Slashdot Mirror


Fake Engine Noise Is the Auto Industry's Dirty Little Secret

HughPickens.com writes Stomp on the gas in a new Ford Mustang or F-150 and you'll hear a meaty, throaty rumble — the same style of roar that Americans have associated with auto power and performance for decades. Now Drew Harwell reports at the Washington Post that the auto industry's dirty little secret is that the engine growl in some of America's best-selling cars and trucks is actually a finely tuned bit of lip-syncing, boosted through special pipes or digitally faked altogether. "Fake engine noise has become one of the auto industry's dirty little secrets, with automakers from BMW to Volkswagen turning to a sound-boosting bag of tricks," writes Harwell. "Without them, today's more fuel-efficient engines would sound far quieter and, automakers worry, seemingly less powerful, potentially pushing buyers away." For example Ford sound engineers and developers worked on an "Active Noise Control" system on the 2015 Mustang EcoBoost that amplifies the engine's purr through the car speakers. Afterward, the automaker surveyed members of Mustang fan clubs on which processed "sound concepts" they most enjoyed.

Among purists, the trickery has inspired an identity crisis and cut to the heart of American auto legend. The "aural experience" of a car, they argue, is an intangible that's just as priceless as what's revving under the hood. "For a car guy, it's literally music to hear that thing rumble," says Mike Rhynard, "It's a mind-trick. It's something it's not. And no one wants to be deceived." Other drivers ask if it really matters if the sound is fake? A driver who didn't know the difference might enjoy the thrum and thunder of it nonetheless. Is taking the best part of an eight-cylinder rev and cloaking a better engine with it really, for carmakers, so wrong? "It may be a necessary evil in the eyes of Ford," says Andrew Hard, "but it's sad to think that an iconic muscle car like the Mustang, a car famous for its bellowing, guttural soundtrack, has to fake its engine noise in 2015. Welcome to the future."

518 of 823 comments (clear)

  1. Just give the option to turn it off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For some, having engine noise is fine. However, the '70s and '80s with the purring V8s are gone, and the vehicles that will be the norm will either be hybrids, diesels, or electric cars.

    As someone who likes modern cars, we don't need any more noise added. In fact, there is something nice about a Tesla or Prius's silence at idle.

    1. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In fact, there is something nice about a Tesla or Prius's silence at idle

      Unless you're blind, or happen to be looking the other way when the drunk in a prius bears down on you. Which is why some sort of fake engine noise will eventually be mandated (if it hasn't been already).

      The "tick tick" of your turn signals has been fake for years, mechanical relays are long past.

    2. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Anybody that has driven a manual shifter knows that engine noise is a useful feedback mechanism to the driver. Making the sound more pleasant is a good thing. How much it is useful now is up for debate, but I find engine sound feedback to be useful in driving efficiently even though I also prefer it to be as quiet a possible.

      Yes, its about aesthetics as well, just like some paint jobs, or even obnoxious bumper stickers.

    3. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ChasmCoder · · Score: 1

      I agree, I love my vehicle to be as silent as possible. But I'm not a "Car Guy" :/

    4. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Entirely different things. In the case of the turn signal that's just part of the UI, not unlike click feedback on keyboards. In the case of blind people that's a safety feature. In either case there is no need for them to be annoying to the driver, which engine noise is to many people. Matter of fact quiet is a feature on luxury cars.

    5. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unless you're blind, or happen to be looking the other way when the drunk in a prius bears down on you. Which is why some sort of fake engine noise will eventually be mandated (if it hasn't been already). The "tick tick" of your turn signals has been fake for years, mechanical relays are long past.

      But not on your internal speakers, at worst you have to install an exterior speaker to deliver "engine" noises. In fact, you can probably do active noise cancellation of it internally so you barely hear your own engine. The turn signal on the other hand serves an actual purpose, to remind you that you're still signaling to other people that you're turning as in some curves it won't turn itself off. For driving a manual car the engine noise serves a purpose too, but it's getting more and more rare even here in Europe.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The click is there as a safety feature so that you don't have to look down to see that your turn signal is still on.

    7. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by monkeyzoo · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree. Acoustic aesthetics are important and worthwhile of engineering attention.

      Quiet (or as quiet as possible) is one aesthetic that may be desirable. For other people (or perhaps cars), a good rumble (as long as it not excessively load and obnoxious) is equally a desirable aesthetic. It's not so different, as you note, than choice of paint job.

      For a company to put attention into this aspect of the user experience is a positive thing.

      There was just a podcast on this very topic, namely the lack of attention that many companies put into the aural experience of their products and how very important that experience is to consumers. http://99percentinvisible.org/...

      Here is an excerpt:

      'Car companies also consider sound in the design of their product. A Ford Mustang, for instance, will intentionally not sound the same as a Ford Taurus, even if their engines are similar.

      In 2008, Ford decided to put out a remake of a Mustang that appeared in the 1968 film, Bullitt. The car sounded like this: [video].

      Ford wanted to make the 2008 Bullitt sound akin to the 1968 Bullitt. They were trying, essentially, to make a new car sound old.

      This proved especially challenging, because cars made in 1968 were built completely differently; the 1968 Bullitt had a carburetor, for instance, and the new model had a fuel injection system. Plus, the Mustang in the movie was enhanced with sounds recorded from a race car—and it’s actually illegal in most places to drive around in a car as loud as the car from the movie would be if it were real.

      With all those factors in mind, Ford identified the key characteristics of the Mustang sounds in the movie. They then figured out how to reverse-engineer those notes as best as they could by tweaking the shapes of the tubes in the car’s exhaust system.

      Brands that don’t pay attention to sound may get punished by consumers.'

    8. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by BlueBlade · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This "mandated" engine noise concept is so infuriating to me. We finally have the technology to remove both the air and noise pollution at the same time, but you want to add noise to an otherwise silent engine just because people aren't used to silent cars? People will just have to adapt to the fact that you can't trust your hearing to know if a car is coming or not anymore.

      This reminds me of that ridiculous law that there had to be a person walking ahead of a car because unlike horses, cars can't react if something's in the way.

      --
      Religion is the best example of mass psychosis
    9. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Coren22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It sounds like you fell for the sound engineering than.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Junta · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are plenty of videos now of people doing comparitve drive with the fuse in or out. With fuse out, it sounds much more like one would expect a 4-cylinder turbo to sound. It's not exactly terrible, but it is markedly different than the sound of the V6. The manipulation brings it more in line with a larger engine for people too insecure to be reminded they are driving a 4 cylinder.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    11. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Junta · · Score: 1

      Of course, in that case you still don't need the fake engine. The natural sound of the engine is plenty adequate. Ford more screwed with the tone to make it sound like a bigger engine. Pull the fuse and you still hear it, just sounds different.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    12. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      There are still plenty of V8s that purr today, though most won't as loudly with stock exhaust. I am a fan, however, of the way the 500 Abarth does it. The former Chrysler SRT exhaust tuning wizards managed to make an exhaust that's quiet enough when you want it to be, but raucous and raspy when you get on the gas. No fake sound needed.

    13. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, all those blind drivers need tactile feedback on the turn signal.

    14. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well the thing is, cylingers are a bit like testicles. Real men have 6, not 4.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    15. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If driving efficiency is your goal, step #1 is ditching the manual shifter. You don't have the remotest hope of beating the computer at that game anymore.

    16. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

      Though I suspect this mandated noise will be very different from the faux muscle car roar. Longer wavelength sounds are harder to localize, which makes much of the deep growl of a V8 -- real or simulated -- less useful than, say, the backup beep of a large truck.

    17. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by samwichse · · Score: 2, Informative

      Than what?

    18. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      And what does that make people with 8, 10, 12 or even 16 cylinders? 6 seems downright emasculating at that point.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    19. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This isn't a safety issue at all. A comparison would be: People are used to TVs being large CRT tube devices so we're taking our flat panel display and adding a huge back to it so people will think there's more "TV power" in the giant box.

      This is all about the auto manufacturers thinking people won't like quiet cars and so intentionally making cars make more noise to trick people into thinking "noisy car" = "powerful car".

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    20. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I had a 2015 GT Mustang drive by me yesterday, and I clearly remember thinking "wow, that sounds nice".

      If they designed the engine to sound good, I don't see the problem. That's part of the aesthetic appeal of the car. Cars are designed to look pleasing to the eye, and sound pleasing to the ear. A car is an engineering project, so of course sound engineering is a component of cars, and it has been for a long time. For example, car doors are carefully designed to give a satisfying "thunk" when the door is closed.

      On the other hand, piping in fake engine noise into the cabin goes way to far imo. There is an inherent disconnect between generating the noise from the engine itself, and piping in digital data through a speaker system. When people listen to engine noise, they expect to be hearing the engine. Special sound pipes or not, it's still the actual engine making the noise. Once that rule is broken people will feel mislead.

    21. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by rhazz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Car enthusiasts who were also audiophiles were surveyed to find out what they thought about the synthesized engine noise. They all complained that the sound wasn't pure enough without Monster cables delivering the full spectrum of "whooshiness" to the speakers.

    22. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What, exactly, was 'ridiculous' about the law that there had to be a person ahead of the car? The reason for that 'ridiculous' law was that a nosiy car could, in fact, scare a horse and cause it to bolt, and a bolting horse is a dangerous thing. The person had to be in front of the car to warn others that it was approaching so they could be prepared, nothing ridiculous about that at all. Once cars became commonplace they were no longer scary as people and animals got used to them. When that happened there was no further need for a person in front or a law requiring such.

      Like it or not, people have been trained for over a century that cars make noise. We even instruct children to 'stop, look, and listen'. The world is not going to suddenly adapt to silent cars. People (and service animals) will need to get used to silent cars - that is not going to happen until silent cars are ubiquitous, which is certainly not true now. There is nothing ridiculous about mandating some amount of noise in the meantime.

    23. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by samwichse · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've driven plenty of modern automatics. And modern manuals.

      I still can get significantly better gas mileage in a MT than an auto (no matter what the EPA ratings say... those are dumb anyway because they mandate shift points).

      And I can look ahead and anticipate what gear I want to be in. Even these manumatics with paddle shifters or whatever feel terrible when you say... approach a curve and want to preemptively downshift for engine braking and pulling out of the curve. They simply don't know your intent, and don't seem to have the wherewithal to do it smoothly.

      I'm not a race car driver, but I am someone who likes their car to be responsive, and M/T is still the only option for me AFAIC.

      Sam

    24. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      But you agree that you want to hear it. So then, tell me specifically what is wrong with adjusting that sound to make it more pleasing to the customer?

    25. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's more about the sound of a four cylinder turbo engine being annoying as hell. People hate teenage kids with fart boxes on their mom's civic for a reason. A lower exhaust note is more pleasant to the human ear.

      Also, anyone driving a manual, or even an auto-manual, needs to hear the engine to know when to shift, because they can't be staring at the tachometer when driving.

    26. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      People will just have to adapt to the fact that you can't trust your hearing to know if a car is coming or not anymore.

      We might even have to teach people to look both ways before crossing the street!

    27. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bobbied · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, all those blind drivers need tactile feedback on the turn signal.

      I see what you did there....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    28. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by rnturn · · Score: 5, Funny

      My hope is that there'll be a way to define your own fake car noise. I'll want my silent electric car to emit a sound like George Jetson's "car".

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    29. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Engine noise is not and was never a "safety feature". It is a by-product of making the car go.
      Everything you listed are safety features.
      Deciding that engines are too quiet because people are used to them being loud is ridiculous.

    30. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      The noise that carmakers add is completely different from the mandated engine noise that the GP is complaining about. That mandated noise IS entirely a safety issue. Unless, of course, you think that the sense of hearing evolved entirely accidentally and has nothing to do with increasing you chances of staying alive.

    31. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Not really, no. Automatics generally shift less optimally than a human, and in doing so, waste fuel. The only advantage they have is that they will put up with changing gear more often, and as such, are able to have 8-10 speed gearboxes fitted rather than the traditional 4-6 speed in a manual. That allows them to keep things closer to the optimal rev range. The result - an automatic will generally get almost exactly the same milage as a manual.

    32. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      However, the '70s and '80s with the purring V8s are gone, and the vehicles that will be the norm will either be hybrids, diesels, or electric cars.

      I love the sound a VW small-car diesel engine makes, especially when it's got a modded exhaust. First of all, it sounds like your Beetle has delusions of being a big truck, which is just funny. Second, when you're accelerating quickly the turbo whine makes it sound like it has delusions of being a jet!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    33. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by sjames · · Score: 2

      The auditory feedback is useful since it's what alerts you to look at the car that is unexpectedly moving. It also helps blind people who might need to cross the street.

    34. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      Yeah well, that's because a turbo dampens the sound as the turbine pulls energy form the exhaust pressure (by design). So these kids are opening up the backend to make it "fart" a lot louder.

      From an exhaust note perspective, a NA engine sounds much better if it's tuned right. It's also important to take advantage of the scavenging effect for increase performance too.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    35. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because something was not designed specifically to be a safety feature does not, in fact, mean it is not a safety feature. Noise IS used as a safety feature.

      Let me guess, you are one of those people who are so superior to everyone else that you can rely solely on vision to determine when it is safe to cross a road. Even at night with a moron driver who 'forgot' to put on his lights. Even when your vision is momentarily distracted by something. Even if you are blind.

    36. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by itzly · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with adjusting the sound, as long as they explain that the sound has been enhanced, and offer an option to disable it for the customers who don't want it.

    37. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by itzly · · Score: 1

      Automatics generally shift less optimally than a human

      Obviously you've never been in the car when my wife is driving.

    38. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      If driving efficiency is your goal, step #1 is ditching the manual shifter. You don't have the remotest hope of beating the computer at that game anymore.

      There is no way a manual transmission isn't more efficient in most cases, providing you drive them correctly. Manual transmissions are lighter, cheaper to build, and have lower operating losses (no torque converter and hydraulic pumps to run). Now if you drive a manual wrong and don't shift at the right times, MPG could be bad, but on the highway where shifting isn't done, you are going to literally drive away from an automatic efficiency wise.. Oh, and a manual transmission will last a LOT longer and cost you a lot less to maintain than that automatic.

      Also #1 rule in driving efficiency isn't ditching the manual shift.... The #1 is managing your driving to minimize how hard you press either the gas or break. The less you press the peddles, the more MPG you will get and the less wear and tear you will do to your car. Don't be aggressive, drive smooth and calm. I find that I use more efficient shift points too, when I'm not trying to eek out that last ounce of performance... Well, that and keeping your tires inflated...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    39. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly, most modern cars these days are already so silent, the only sound you hear from them is the cooling fan and the tire noise. It is only the 'muscle' type cars, that make noise, and like the article says, its just because people expect them to. Hell, the 'Harley Davidson' edition Ford F150 magically sounds like a motorcycle, because they can make it sound any damn way they want now. I agree, the idea of mandating 'fake engine noise' is preposterous, because its pretending this is a new problem, when cars have already been nearly dead silent at parking lot speeds for years now.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    40. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by hey! · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a cyclist, I can attest a Prius is not a totally silent vehicle. Nor, I am sure, is a Tesla although I've never encountered one on the road. The reason is tire noise.

      For a modern car traveling at 20+ MPH and not accelerating, tire noise is the dominant sound. You can easily hear a car traveling at speed from a hundred yards or more away, almost entirely from the tire noise. The engine of a well-maintained car traveling at a constant 30 MPH might as well be totally silent.

      At low speeds such as would be encountered in a parking lot or congested city street the engine noise is dominant, particularly because the car is doing a lot of accelerating and decelerating. At those speeds I think a modest synthesized engine sound is a very good idea, especially when you consider blind people and even more especially service dogs, who would have to be re-trained for some other kind of noise. There would be no need for the artificial sound once the car is at cruising speed.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    41. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Darth Vader (Dave Prowse) has been advocating that since the 70s...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    42. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      I sort of half realized this was a thing a few years back, when I was out and about and one of those Harley Davidson edition F150's drove past me, and I realized that it actually sounded a fair bit like a Harley, while a normal F150 does not. It does not surprise me one bit to find out that engine noise now is all a matter of special pipes and custom sound engineering to make it sound 'the way we expect.'

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    43. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by rnturn · · Score: 2

      ``We even instruct children to 'stop, look, and listen'.''

      So the govt. puts out PSAs that urge people to `stop, look, and look again' when crossing the street. It's a good practice, anyway. Cyclists don't make much noise -- most of the noise made by a car is from the tires and the road surface and a bike's skinny tires make the cyclist much more stealthy -- and a bike/pedestrian collision can be nearly as deadly as one involving cars. Of course, the govt. could always mandate that cyclists clamp something to the fork that is used to hold baseball cards in the spokes. (As a kid, I actually preferred using plastic-coated playing cards as they were louder than baseball cards.) I actually expect something like that to be making its way through local legislatures instead of teaching pedestrians to be more alert when crossing the street.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    44. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Real men have them in a V configuration. Really real men have a W configuration.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    45. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      However, the '70s and '80s with the purring V8s are gone

      Even back then, I remember people, ahem.."enhancing" their engine sound. If I had a nickel for every motorhead who put glasspacks on their exhaust just to make their car sound more badass, I'd have a SHITLOAD of nickels.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    46. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      It's not the auto manufacturers' fault that their best customers think that way.

    47. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Yes, they might benefit from giving that option, but for some reason they determined it would not be a positive factor from a market perspective. Only they know the reasoning.

      OTOH, why would someone buy a car if they don't like the sound? It appears that consumers not liking the sound to this point has not been an issue. Awareness could possibly impact that in the future.

    48. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by xfade551 · · Score: 1

      I drive a vehicle with a modern V-8 Hemi. It's incredibly quiet, except when I really stomp on the gas, and even then it's not that loud. I suppose I could swap the exhaust for Magnaflows or something, but it's kind of fun having a sleeper vehicle, especially when a couple tricked out Hondas pull up on you on the freeway when you're already doing 70mph at merely 1600 rpm.

    49. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Same for the Ecoboost. It purrs at idle, but put your foot in it and you hear the horsepower.

      No you hear audio engineering. I had a Mercedes SLK230 some time ago. Supercharged 4 cylinder. Growled deeply like an old V8 because the Mercedes engineers tuned it to do that, not because it needed to. Now they are actually using the speaker system to emit sounds because some people (not me) for whatever reason like obnoxious noises. (Harley riders I'm looking right at you) They could make even relatively high horsepower cars much quieter than they do. They purposefully choose not to and they even try to make cars sound louder and more "impressive" than they really are.

    50. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Tailor the pipes, that's fine. Hell, you can buy after market pipes and tailor the sound they way you want.

      I doubt, though, that they have hidden speakers on the outside of the car.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    51. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      You typically will hear the tire noise of an approaching vehicle long before you hear its engine noise. Even electric cars can't get rid of that.

      Source: Many hundreds of miles of bicycle touring.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    52. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      There was never such a law.

    53. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      Fun fact: What you're actually hearing from most approaching vehicles is tire noise rather than their engine sound.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    54. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by swillden · · Score: 5, Informative

      In fact, there is something nice about a Tesla or Prius's silence at idle

      Unless you're blind, or happen to be looking the other way when the drunk in a prius bears down on you.

      My Nissan LEAF has a speaker mounted in the driver-side front wheel well which makes noise (a tone that sweeps across the frequency range, to cover people with frequency-limited hearing) whenever the vehicle is moving below 20 mph. It's not fake engine noise, it's better.

      As to the article... I have learned to really enjoy the silence of an EV. Engine noise annoys me.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    55. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Interesting...

      I purchased a new Nissan Versa a few years ago with their continuously variable transmission. It runs awesome. From an engineering point of view, it amazes me that they can build a car with such a small engine and make it perform at highway speeds.

      However, I did read that when the CVT was new, some people in their focus groups didn't like it because it *sounds* different. The first time I drove it, I thought there was something wrong with it because of the sound, but it didn't bother me once I knew it was supposed to sound different. If I'm not mistaken, they changed the CVT to make it sound more like a conventional automatic transmission.

      It seems awfully dumb to me that a piece of equipment that was so carefully engineered should be modified simply to make it sound like the equipment it replaces!

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    56. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Informative
      "Stop, look, and listen" is for crossing train tracks.

      "Look both ways before crossing" is for streets.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    57. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I was dining with a friend on the deck of a local eatery when some idiot stopped in and started revving his high-pitched POS Chinese 49cc "moped" (as it is called under state regulations)

      My friend shouted curses at him as he left. I just remarked that it was a "Soprano Harley Davidson". How annoying!

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    58. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Quiet (or as quiet as possible) is one aesthetic that may be desirable. For other people (or perhaps cars), a good rumble (as long as it not excessively load and obnoxious) is equally a desirable aesthetic. It's not so different, as you note, than choice of paint job.

      Not like a paint job. You can choose to avert your eyes from a garish paint job. You can't choose to shut off your ears to an obnoxiously noisy car. If you want your car to have a throaty rumble, fine, but pipe it through your internal speakers only. Don't inflict it on the rest of us just to stroke your own ego.

    59. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by operagost · · Score: 1

      There most certainly were in the UK. Vermont may have also had some. They went away by the start of the 20th century, though.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    60. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Same for the Ecoboost. It purrs at idle, but put your foot in it and you hear the horsepower.

      I just got a 2015 Ford Explorer, and that's exactly right. I was actually shocked at how quiet it is when it's idling, and how throaty it gets when I hit the gas to pass someone.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    61. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't mind when a garbage truck backs up in your neighborhood at 5 AM with that fucking annoying safety beeper that wakes up the whole neighborhood, because... safety!

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    62. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Sparks23 · · Score: 1

      In fact, there is something nice about a Tesla or Prius's silence at idle

      Unless you're blind, or happen to be looking the other way when the drunk in a prius bears down on you. Which is why some sort of fake engine noise will eventually be mandated (if it hasn't been already).

      This is actually mandated now, but the rules are kind of mushy. It was signed into law in 2011 here in the US, and applies to 2012 models, but there weren't initially strict guidelines on the noises. So you'll find the 2011 Nissan Leaf has a 'silent' mode where it won't make the backing-up beep-beep alert or the turbine-like engine noise when driving, but the 2012 and later models cannot silence the engine noises.

      Wikipedia has a good breakdown of the state of the current noise laws across the US, Japan, the EU, and the UK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

      --
      --Rachel
    63. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by unrtst · · Score: 1

      ``We even instruct children to 'stop, look, and listen'.''

      So the govt. puts out PSAs that urge people to `stop, look, and look again' when crossing the street.

      ... or a PSA to 'stop, look, and make a shit ton of noise so the cars and bikes can hear you'.

      Honestly though, this line of argument seems stupid to me. We're already well past the point of having many vehicles that are nearly silent, especially in relation to other ambient noise in cities. This has been the case for a long time.

      This also reminds me of the myth from the motorcycle world that "Loud pipes save lives". For one, that's a myth. For two, the intent of that is that other road-colleagues would notice the rider, rather than a concern over pedestrians.

    64. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      As someone who likes old cars, I second that. Noise as a security feature is ok, as an enhancement of the driving experience is a bit pathetic. Besides, the typical V8 muscle car has not really the best noise. I rate it a bit below the 4cyl double carb alfa's, well below the vintage Ferrari's, and really below the 6 carb countach with modded exhausts.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    65. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by jakimfett · · Score: 1

      *citation needed

      --
      Bits of code, random ramblings: jakimfett.com
    66. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Even ignoring the obvious problems with blind people and idiots who forgot to turn on their lights, what about trying to cross a road that has a bend it in. Often you can't see around the bend, and the only way to safely cross is to listen for cars coming. Not only that, but as a cyclist, I find it very important to be able to hear cars coming up behind me. Sure I look back and check to see if they are coming, but the closing speed is really fast on some roads, and the car could be catch up to you in a very short period of time. And again, you might not be able to see the car even if they are only a little bit behind you if there is a bend in the road.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    67. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now if you drive a manual wrong and don't shift at the right times, MPG could be bad, but on the highway where shifting isn't done, you are going to literally drive away from an automatic efficiency wise.

      This is BS. EPA mileage figures are now showing most cars getting better highway mileage for automatics than for manuals, and as you say, you don't need to do much shifting on the highway. The reason for this is that automatics these days have more gears, and most likely have a higher gear ratio on the highway. Automatics can get away with having a higher gear ratio for their highest gear because it takes them milliseconds to downshift when the driver accelerates at speed; manuals can't do that, since they have fewer gears and drivers tend to hold gears more because shifting takes time and effort.

      Things have really changed a LOT in the last 10-15 years with regard to the whole manual vs. automatic debate. 15+ years ago, manuals were clearly the superior choice for a competent driver, far and away. Not any more. For many cars, they're about the same now; for many others, automatics are clearly superior. In another 5 years, manuals will be a clearly inferior choice across the board. (It's taking some time for the most-advanced automatics to get into all car models.)

    68. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      I second the "we don't need any more noise added". I guess if they have to pipe it into the internal stereo speakers, at least they aren't bothering everyone else. This is from someone who used to have a pickup with a 454 and headers and it would set off car alarms just driving by even before the exhaust pipes fell off. After the pipes fell off, it sounded just like a dragster at full throttle.

    69. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fun fact: studies have shown that hybrid and electric cars are 37% more likely to hit pedestrians and 66% more likely to hit cyclists than ICE cars at under 35MPH.

      You may not THINK you are hearing engine noise, but you are, and it makes a difference.

    70. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The association between 'loud' and 'powerful' is a trifle odd given that noise (like heat) is an inefficiency, a mere byproduct of the vehicle's attempt to do its real job.

      If all engines were of exactly equal (in)efficiency, using sound as a proxy for power would be sensible enough, since more powerful engines would bleed more waste noise; but this is hardly the case. Some engines achieve enormous power in near total silence, some fart-can nonsense is deliberately made louder, possibly even at the expense of performance.

      Is the fascination with vehicles that make loud noises some sort of primal thing, that we'll probably never manage to breed out of people, related to some retro equivalent of the competition between bullfrogs trying to croak more loudly and deeply to impress mates with their inferred size; or is it a much more recent development, largely tied to the period of American automobile manufacturing where engine designs and manufacturing tolerances were a bit crude; but The World's Greatest Nation could always just add more cylinders and bigger fins to achieve the desired effect, and thus likely to die out once the population turns over and most people have only been exposed to relatively well damped and comparatively efficient IC engines, or to electrics?

      Using your ears to judge a car likely won't go out of style(since your ability to sense the acceleration of an engine capable of ramping up like inertia is somebody else's problem is partially based there); but sound seems so...crude.

    71. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Bicycles don't make much noise either... neither do electric wheelchairs or other sidewalk-based vehicles. They are all just as capable of running down somebody who cannot see them as a car would be, and although the likelihood of a fatality is somewhat lower, primarily owing to the lower mass of such items, and in turn the total momentum involved in any collision with them, the injuries from such a colision can still be very severe, and can even require hospitalization.

    72. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 2

      Uh, no. You can't provide a citation of something that never was. You can, however, provide a citation to something that supposedly exists. So, where exactly is the citation for this 'law'? Let me guess: wikipedia. Oops, even that (again providing no citations) specifically says it never became law.

    73. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by monkeyzoo · · Score: 1

      I said as long as it is not excessively loud! Pleasant sound quality is not the same as loud volume!

    74. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by by+(1706743) · · Score: 1

      I don't think I'm brave enough to ask what the Wankel analogy would be...

    75. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      How do you explain the studies done by the NHTSA that show hybrids and electrics, at speeds under 35MPH, are 37% more likely to hit walkers and 66% more likely to hit cyclists than ICE cars?

    76. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you looked at the technology behind an automatic? They've come on a long way. Many modern autos share more in common with manual transmissions the autos of old.

      The automatic transmission on a Honda Jazz, for example, is a mechanically actuated manual box. The stick is replaced by a set of servos that change gear for you - the underlying mechanics are the same.

      There are a whole host of other designs out there that have ditched the torque converter. Modern autos are at least as good as a modern manual transmission for drivetrain efficiency. The majority of the fuel saving is down to the operator between the pedals and the wheel.

    77. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      As someone who likes modern cars, we don't need any more noise added.

      Never mind turning it off, just wait until they start offering to sell you downloadable "engine tones".

      You haven't really driven an i8 until you've driven it in "Crazy Frog" mode.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    78. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except try driving a manual transmission car when you can't hear any engine noise. Either the engine wouldn't last very long (due to over-reving constantly), or you'd spend the whole time staring at the cluster to know when to shift to the next gear.

      many people, especially car enthusiasts, still like manual transmission cars.

    79. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      If driving efficiency is your goal, step #1 is ditching the manual shifter. You don't have the remotest hope of beating the computer at that game anymore.

      Wrong. Even setting aside the fact that an auto transmission has less mechanical efficiency. The computer cannot see the road ahead, it generally bases its decisions on the present moment, which can be wrong. My car is auto and it often makes wrong decisions about what gear to be in (I often override it).

      In recognition of this, some up-market cars have started using GPS positioning so that the transmission can anticipate hills and bends etc, but even that cannot anticipate a traffic situation ahead.

    80. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Well at least you will have the comfort of knowing, with your dying breath, that it was the other guys responsibility.

    81. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If a vehicle is approaching at anything over about 20mph, the noise of the tires on the road will generall be louder than the engine, unless the engine is faulty, or the vehicle has a bad muffler. And in practice, you can hear the sound of tires on the road of any approaching vehicle when it is going any faster than just rolling at speeds one could keep pace with on foot. I remember from when I first learning to drive, drivers are supposed to have an obligation to be aware of and respect pedestrians that may not know the vehicle is there, such as blind people anyways.

    82. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      In NY, bicycles by law must have a bell and it must be used.

    83. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      If the closing speed is that fast, you are going to hear the sound of the vehicle's tires on the road before you hear the vehicle's engine, unless the vehicle's engine is faulty, or there is something wrong with its muffler.

    84. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      There is no way a manual transmission isn't more efficient in most cases, providing you drive them correctly.

      And that is the issue. many people don't drive them for efficiency. Not that I'm saying that some don't. I know myself better. I was a gear head in my youth. When I drive a standard, I have a really bad habit of trying to keep the engine revving in it's power band at all times. Particularly if I'm in a low horsepower car. For whatever reason, I subconsciously expect anything with a standard transmission to have the 400+ horsepower V8 I was used to my cars having back then.

      Manual transmissions are lighter, cheaper to build, and have lower operating losses (no torque converter and hydraulic pumps to run). Now if you drive a manual wrong and don't shift at the right times, MPG could be bad, but on the highway where shifting isn't done, you are going to literally drive away from an automatic efficiency wise..

      Perhaps with older transmissions. But automatics have had lock up torque converters (commonly) for at least 20 years.If you have an automatic with one, the mileage will be virtually identical in the case you describe. The extra weight of the automatic is about the only difference.

      Oh, and a manual transmission will last a LOT longer and cost you a lot less to maintain than that automatic.

      I can't say what modern transmissions are like as I don't push my cars like I did when I was younger. But traditionally, automatics have been much tougher. Plus they don't have a clutch and pressure plate that need to be replaced, or a flywheel that needs to be replaced or resurfaced either. It's also fun to discover the importance of a blow proof bell housing (the hard way) in a manual. I've never had clutch fragments come flying through the floor boards and interior of a car with an automatic. I wish I could say otherwise about standard transmissions.

      Standard transmissions have built in wear items. If you don't beat the piss out of your car, use a good synthetic ATF, and change it regularly, an automatic is pretty damn cheap.

      I was never really into drag racing, but those guys still prefer the 2 speed automatic Powerglide transmissions. They're easy to work on, and are tough enough to make 100 to 150 runs before needing to be rebuilt. Which takes 2 to 3 hours if you know what you're doing.

    85. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      If the "tick tick" is fake, then why do the lights blink at different rates when a bulb is out?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    86. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by zieroh · · Score: 1

      It also helps blind people who might need to cross the street.

      And what if they are deaf as well as blind? What accommodations should we make for those pedestrians?

      Perhaps we should mandate that all electric cards must shoot a stream of water 100 feet ahead of them at all times, just in case a deaf and blind pedestrian happens to be present.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    87. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Another issue is that manual cars rarely get the level of overdrive gear that automatic cars do. In my car, the engine is at 3000 RPM at 60 mph in top gear. The same car would be about 2000 rpm at 60 mph in the automatic model.

      It's unfair to give an automatic car a fuel saving advantage that could just have easily have been given to the manual gearbox and then claim it's because automatics are more efficient that they get better mileage.

    88. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by maestroX · · Score: 1

      .. but you want to add noise to an otherwise silent engine just because people aren't used to silent cars?

      I remember modelling bearings in a Swedish research centre using SGI's about 20 yrs ago, just for the sound (BMW, Mercedes).
      Buyers tend to identify with their cars and pay the experience.

    89. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by karnal · · Score: 1

      What's done in some instances is that they'll make a "sport shifting" mode that is selectable and it forces the CVT into locked gear ratios like a normal transmission.

      My wife and I have had a Ford Freestyle for quite some time now, and it is slightly different from a normal auto... in fact her drive in the car on the way home she was doing 80mph on the freeway because she wasn't used to the sound yet!

      --
      Karnal
    90. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1
    91. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Engine noise, especially when the PTO is activated, is far louder than beeping. You can hear it clearly when a hybrid garbage truck picks up garbage. It is almost silent and the beeper seems far less obnoxious.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    92. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The click is there due to the bimetallic strip that deforms when the lights state (on purpose, of course). The safety benefit was an afterthought, but once solid state electronics took over people had realized the convenience and integrated a purposeful noise into the system instead.

    93. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ilparatzo · · Score: 1

      Most of the links I was able to find stated that event the NHTSA felt that their were major weaknesses in their study. First, it was done in only 12 states. Second, it is only since 2000 so that sample set is drastically reduced compared to other accident studies which can typically go back much farther. Though you can start to use this sort of data to think ahead, you can't use it to make broad statements and force change in the automotive industry. It also doesn't use the more tried and true method of accident studies which is based on distances traveled. It's more of a "wow, something to think about and consider" versus a "hey, this is a fact, shut up and get used to it" kind of study.

      On a side note, for pedestrian accidents the increased rate is primarily due to backing up, something you can easily attribute more to noise but I thought we were going to solve with backup camera mandates?

      But overall, those looking at the study and performing it agree that the data set is too small to make large scale conclusions. And unless we want to just be alarmist, it's probably not a good idea to take this and run with it. Instead, use it to commission some larger and more detailed studies. Who knows, maybe the people who drive hybrids tend to not pay as close attention to what they are doing? I could make a latte sipping, enjoying the smell of their own farts joke here, but I'll refrain. Oops, I guess I already did. ;-)

      http://www.greencarreports.com...
      http://www.treehugger.com/cars...

    94. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      There is something wrong with most stock mufflers.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    95. Re: Just give the option to turn it off... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      While girly men have VW's?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    96. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by spleck · · Score: 1

      Unless you're blind, or happen to be looking the other way when the drunk in a prius bears down on you. Which is why some sort of fake engine noise will eventually be mandated (if it hasn't been already).

      When you're in front of a car, you don't hear much engine noise. Especially since there is very little load on the engine at speeds fast enough to hurt people (unless they're testing their 0-60 time). What you DO hear is road noise from the tires, which is not any different between electric and ICE vehicles.

      The Nissan Leaf, for instance, makes an artificial electric vehicle noise until about 20 mph... after that you wouldn't be able to hear the fake engine noise over the wind and tires. Go listen to one drive around a parking lot though, and you'll mostly hear it leaving.

      I'm kind of against the noise in general, as I don't think many blind people are being saved by the artificial noise (but rather from aids, the real sounds, etc), and short of the driving honking, some fake engine noise isn't going to save you from a drunk prius bearing down on you.

    97. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They make the Harley editions of anything miss. It can't be a Harley without the patented Harley miss. You can sell non-Harley V twins in the USA, but if they have a miss they violate Harley's sound patent.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    98. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm working on an app that changes the text input cursor blink rate if your turn signal is on for more than twenty seconds... helps maintain the illusion of driver attentiveness. I have a couple more features to work out (shoe and bicycle part recognition mostly) and then I'll be calling the app "Oh Crap What Did I Just Hit?" Now if I can just tie into the cars backup cam for a screen grab after crashing sounds...

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    99. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Still butt-hurt the Pontiac GTO beat the Ferrari GTO around Monza?

      Admittedly it was a GTO judge.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    100. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      I want the "zoom zoom" jingle from the Mazda TV ads.

    101. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Put in racy motor mounts. Keeps you in contact with the engine, less obnoxious then a fart can.

      Also improves the cars launch.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    102. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 2

      What does the last line of that article say? I'll copy it here for you: THE BILL DID NOT BECOME LAW. So where is the citation that there was ever a law. For that matter, where is the citation that the legislature actually made such a bill? And no, wikipedia does not count.

    103. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Should we mandate that all cars should smell strongly of rotten eggs, just in case a someone is looking the other way in an environment with a lot of background noise drowning out the mandated fake engine noise?

    104. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bws111 · · Score: 1

      By law (at least in many states in the US), they do. You did know that, right?

    105. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Same for the Ecoboost. It purrs at idle, but put your foot in it and you hear the horsepower.

      Really?
      So you agree with my statement as he was talking about the "small engine" ecoboost model.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    106. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You'll get hacked and be driving a Rick Roller.

    107. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by maharvey · · Score: 1

      Tactile? You mean like an oscillating clue-bat attached to the head rest?

    108. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      It's spooky on a bicycle because you can hear EVERY other vehicle coming from behind you.

    109. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Is the bell required, by law, to be constantly ringing while the bicycle is in motion? No? Then my point stands... the bicycle is, on its own, relatively silent, and just as capable of inflicting injury that can be just as serious as that caused by an automobile that is moving in silence (because at anything over a few mph, the vehicle tires on the road will be be plainly audible anyways).

    110. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Unless you're blind, or happen to be looking the other way when the drunk in a prius bears down on you. Which is why some sort of fake engine noise will eventually be mandated (if it hasn't been already)

      Exactly. Not to mention that drivers should also be required by law, if approaching an intersection, to stop 100 ft from the intersection and discharge a firearm into the air to warn horse traffic. In addition all vehicles must be led by a pedestrian carrying a red flag to warn bystanders of the vehicle's approach. The sooner we pass these laws, the sooner we'll be safe from the threat of electric locomotive vehicles. Come to think of it, we could call the necessary laws "Locomotive Acts".

    111. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      For some, having engine noise is fine. However, the '70s and '80s with the purring V8s are gone, and the vehicles that will be the norm will either be hybrids, diesels, or electric cars.

      As someone who likes modern cars, we don't need any more noise added. In fact, there is something nice about a Tesla or Prius's silence at idle.

      I agree. I would much rather have better sound acoustics for my music than having it messed with by artificial engine sounds.

    112. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Unless you're blind, or happen to be looking the other way when the drunk in a prius bears down on you. Which is why some sort of fake engine noise will eventually be mandated (if it hasn't been already).

      Not really.

      Below 30kph or so, yes, engine noise dominates, but at that speed you're moving slow enough that injuries are far lower. And yes, an electric car is spooky quiet at those speeds.

      Above 30kph, the majority of noise from a car comes from the tires, and the engine (be it ICE or electric) noise doesn't really figure in, save for those with loud pipes or other noise "enhancements".

    113. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 2

      My '96 caprice has a very quiet engine for what it is (4.3L V8). As an experiment, I had my wife drive down the hill and around the bend near where we lived doing 35 mph while I stood in the driveway blindfolded and raised my hand at the first inkling that she was coming through (nice quiet neighborhood) and at that moment she'd mark the point where the car was with a balloon filled with paint. A few times she'd have the engine running as she coasted down the hill. A few other times she'd cut the engine at the crest and coasted down. The average difference between the two was a near consistent 50 feet. The distance between me and the car was generally about 10-15 feet when I'd notice the car going by with the engine off, and 60-80 feet with the engine running. So...engine noise can't be considered a safety feature for pedestrians? Screw you.

      Also, there's a lot of jurisdictions where pedestrians get automatic right-of-way, which means if you hit one, it's automatically your fault (in GA this only applies in zebra-walks to the point that the motorist must stop before a crosswalk the moment a pedestrian enters a crosswalk, regardless of speed/momentum. CT, didn't matter where they stepped off the curb at, automatic ped RoW.)

      It also doesn't help that I've had the living hell scared out of me multiple times by a Tesla going by as I was walking on the side of the road. I didn't "feel" that it was there until it was nearly right on top of me, and it's rather unsettling to see something as large as a car go by you within a few feet without any warning. Tire noise is not nearly as loud as you think it is, unless the tires are heavily ribbed, which most electrics are not going to have. Hybrids/Electrics are actually the least likely to have any substantial ribbing on the tire to keep rolling resistance at a minimum.

      For these reasons, I have no issue with "safety pipes" or "simulated engine noise". The louder, the better. Keeps me safer when I'm walking, and I'm less likely to bowl over someone who doesn't take the time to look when I'm in the other position. You want quiet, get an isolation tank.

    114. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      It's not fake engine noise, it's better.

      The Star Trek:TNG "whoosh!" sound?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    115. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Continuously?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    116. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by cjonslashdot · · Score: 1

      I agree. To me, the ideal car is absolutely quiet. There is already way too much noise in our lives nowadays. Besides, people might as well get used to the fact that the whole concept of a car and driver is destined to become obsolete in not too long: cars will evolve to be living rooms on wheels, driver not required (or even allowed, in urban areas).

    117. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Pope · · Score: 1

      This is engine noise being piped through the sound system, it's not going to help a blind person on the street at all.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    118. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by JoeLinux · · Score: 1

      You sir, owe me a new keyboard.

    119. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      ...Even these manumatics with paddle shifters or whatever feel terrible when you say... approach a curve and want to preemptively downshift for engine braking and pulling out of the curve. They simply don't know your intent, and don't seem to have the wherewithal to do it smoothly.

      I'm not a race car driver, but I am someone who likes their car to be responsive, and M/T is still the only option for me AFAIC.

      Sam

      I'm not sure what you've driven, but in my car (with a DSG and paddle shifters) coming into a corner and downshifting is as smooth, if not smoother, than in a manual.

      In a manual, I would have to heel-toe to rev-match on the downshift, and this is tricky to get spot-on, so there'd be a jerk as the lower gear engaged and the engine was brought up to speed by the car. I'd have to take one hand off the wheel to shift and slide my foot over to in-between the accelerator and brake pedals.

      In a DSG, the ECU knows how fast the engine needs to be turning for the road speed in the lower gear. When I hit the paddle, the ECU blips the throttle and gets the engine to exactly the right rpm for my forward speed and then engages the gear. This happens in around half a second, quicker than I could do it myself and I get to leave both hands on the wheel so I'm in full control of the car.

      I was a die-hard manual fan until I had a car with DSG and paddle shifters. Now, I get the best of both worlds. I can drive as an auto in city traffic and I'm not rowing on the gear shifter and then with the press of a paddle, I can take control of the gear shifts when I'm on a twisty road, or want to accelerate quickly.
      The one thing I miss is launching a manual car - in a manual, when you get it right, an AWD launch with just the right RPMs and just the right amount of slipping the clutch is simply sublime. Even with launch control on a DSG it doesn't quite get there.

    120. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      I want mine to sound like the tomatoes from _Attack of the Killer Tomatoes_

    121. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by swilly · · Score: 1

      The Pennsylvania bill did not become law, but the UK and Vermont ones did (according to the article, which is flagged as needing more than three references).

      I had never heard of the Red Flag traffic laws before. You learn something new every day. I can see why they would be enacted, and why they were thought to be practical (early self-propelled vehicles weren't much faster than a pedestrian, they were only practical for bulk transport). I suspect that many disruptive technologies have crazy laws and regulations before they become mainstream.

    122. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we need to create a tailpipe that can clip-on to the back of a Prius, that spews actual hydrocarbons. :-)

    123. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      The reason for that 'ridiculous' law was that a nosiy car could, in fact, scare a horse and cause it to bolt,

      One needs the historical context to make sense of the law. At the time, many of those laws really were created just to stifle the car industry, not to protect citizens from horses. Another example: In some state, the law required the driver to get out of the car, honk a horn, then fire a gun, then do something else equally ridiculous, then they could drive the car.

    124. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      I thought the Bugatti Veyron is actually a W16, not a V16? It actually has four banks of four cylinders instead of two banks of eight. Am I wrong?

      But in any event, if Koenigsegg can make 1100-odd horsepower from a twin-turbocharged 5 liter V8, then Volkswagen/Bugatti only went with a quad-turbo 8 liter 16 cylinder engine for the sake of being ostentatious.

    125. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      always wondered at the deaf and how they would deal with silent vehicles.

    126. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The high gear thing is important.

      Shifting doesn't really take time and effort. I remember moving to the US and driving an automatic for the first time. I found myself subconsciously wafting at the door with my left hand. The reason is that my hand was seeking the non-existant gear lever (and on the side I was used too, not the correct side for the US) in order to change gear every time the engine made an appropriate noise.

      It's one of those subconscious muscle memory things.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    127. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      But you agree that you want to hear it. So then, tell me specifically what is wrong with adjusting that sound to make it more pleasing to the customer?

      Because that sound is being inflicted on everyone around the car, not just the customer.

    128. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Unless you're blind, or happen to be looking the other way when the drunk in a prius bears down on you. Which is why some sort of fake engine noise will eventually be mandated (if it hasn't been already).

      Studies have shown that cars, even at low velocity, make enough noise just from the road(crunching over gravel and such) that fake engine noise isn't really necessary.

      Besides, it's going to get harder to force the Prius and similar cars to even make the impact with all the new collision avoidance stuff.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    129. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by encyclo · · Score: 2

      This actually exists (well, not the George Jetson bit) - in Europe Renault sells a car with six user-selectable engine sounds:

      See: http://www.autoblog.com/2012/0...

      Choices include a Clio V6, a Nissan GT-R or a Harley motorcycle...

    130. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      >Shifting doesn't really take time and effort.

      Yes, it does. If you need to accelerate **right now**, you're not going to get it with a manual; you have to declutch, change gears, release the clutch, and then you can press on the gas pedal. There's a bare minimum of a half-second there, up to a whole second of delay time. As a result, a car with a stick doesn't have the same gearing: there needs to be enough power available to get some reasonable acceleration in top gear *without* downshifting.

      With a modern automatic (esp. one like a DSG), this doesn't happen. You press the gas in top gear and it shifts in tens of milliseconds.

      Can you downshift in 20 milliseconds? I didn't think so.

    131. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      True. And oddly enough, I manage to hear bicycles in operation just fine (even around blind turns) even though they lack engine noises. This is one of the reasons why I think the "engine noise is a safety issue" argument is a bit bogus.

    132. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Either way, I"m looking to soon buy and modify a '75-'75 Trans Am 455- 4-speed.

      That engine, sounds GOOD. And with a little new exhaust magic, and cutting through the shaker hood so that it become functional again, it will sound AND have close to 500HP.

      Sure it gets 10gal to the mile, but its fun,and I have a job where I can afford it. I miss cars with tons of torque and that sound. I don't want a silent car, what fun is that?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    133. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      In either case there is no need for them to be annoying to the driver, which engine noise is to many people.

      I'm guessing you don't like the sound of a nicely tuned motorcycle engine too, right?

      I'm not talking over the top obnoxious, but one that you can hear readily within the block.

      I mean, a silent electric motorcycle would be no fun whatsoever with no sound.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    134. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Generally, people who are both blind and deaf already have limited autonomy out in the world and need extra assistance.

      Of course, you conveniently ignored the part about it adding safety for people who see and hear just fine.

    135. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      If you don't notice a flashing green light barely in your peripheral vision I would start to wonder if you ought to be driving at all.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    136. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Call me when you can hack it to sound like George Jetson's hovercar.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    137. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      I imagine it's because the relays are either in the engine compartment or hidden behind so much interior trim that they're inaudible. Either way a separate buzzer would be needed. In older cars the flasher unit was easily accessible and there wasn't nearly as much stuff behind the dash..

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    138. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Wow holy smug alert Batman.

      For your reference this is what you said:

      drivers tend to hold gears more because shifting takes time and effort.

      No, one doesn't "hold gears more because it takes time and effort". It's subconscious.

      As a result, a car with a stick doesn't have the same gearing: there needs to be enough power available to get some reasonable acceleration in top gear *without* downshifting.

      Nope. I can assure you that if you floor it in 5th gear in a manual Nissan Serena, you will change speed... eventually. In 4th you'll get it "some time this week". If you want to actually get some accdeleration at 65, you need to drop to 3rd and floor it.

      But that stuff domen't dominate gas mileage. It's for the one time every 1000 miles when some lorry starts to pull out.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    139. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      'inflicted' with a more pleasant sound?

    140. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by kit_triforce · · Score: 1

      People (and service animals) will need to get used to silent cars - that is not going to happen until silent cars are ubiquitous, which is certainly not true now. There is nothing ridiculous about mandating some amount of noise in the meantime.

      How are silent cars supposed to become ubiquitous if the law mandates that they cannot be silent?

    141. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by praxis · · Score: 1

      Also, anyone driving a manual, or even an auto-manual, needs to hear the engine to know when to shift, because they can't be staring at the tachometer when driving.

      No one *needs* to hear the engine noise to know when to shift. Feeling the car's velocity and knowing what gear one's in is sufficient information most of the time.

    142. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hey that's a great study... but from the abstract, it doesn't look like they controlled for SHIT design factors like poor quartering visibility due to A-pillar design. Have you ever ridden in a Prius? Many hybrid vehicles make compromises in cabin design to gain a bit of mileage, and unless your study is controlling for that, then it's just a whitewash piece.

      Additionally, the article didn't control for the self-righteous attitude of most hybrid owners... which certainly must be a contributing factor in auto-pedestrian accidents. /s

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    143. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by praxis · · Score: 1

      It's not the auto manufacturers' fault that their best customers think that way.

      The customer's did not spend millions over decades building a brand...the manufacturer did. You can't claim they've had no influence.

    144. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Livius · · Score: 1

      Half the noise a car makes comes from the tyres, and that's adequate for the visually impaired. Advocates for the disabled (though not so much the disabled themselves) like to create unnecessary nuisance just to make a political statement.

    145. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      Does anybody else remember the V10 Viper H-pipe debacle? Wish I had mod points for you, 'cause you are spot on about that. The stupid car was recalled to fix the exhaust design to make it sound better.

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    146. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Anybody that has driven a manual shifter knows that engine noise is a useful feedback mechanism to the driver.

      I ride a motorcycle. Since the engine is out in the open, you can always hear the engine. And yet I find myself relying more on the throttle response and the tachometer to tell me when to shift. They could be entirely silent and I still would shift at the same points.

      In fact, I did my final test on a Suzuki LS650 Savage, which does not have a tacho, and I hated it. I had to shift entirely on intuition.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    147. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      How would the relay ( not that it is exactly a relay ) being in the engine compartment versus in the dashboard change the blink rate when a bulb is out?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    148. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Rary · · Score: 1

      I'll want my silent electric car to emit a sound like George Jetson's "car".

      I'll take the sound of a TIE Fighter, please.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    149. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by aevan · · Score: 1

      Doesn't even need to be blind, a degree of vision loss can suffice for relying on audio cues as assistent.

      It's also extremely helpful for that moment between "I looked left, I looked right, but when I took a step, some guy turned the corner without looking... but the noise made me pause and look left again". The noise also helps detect the idling car versus the parked car... for when they shoot out without bothering to look, you at least had them assessed as a potential threat before time.

    150. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by swillden · · Score: 1

      I happen to find the leaf noises quite annoying.

      Then you'll notice them.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    151. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I think you are probably taking in the engine sound feedback more than you realize. Not saying you couldn't perform just fine with a silent engine, but that sound typically becomes part of the response environment.

      I don't like driving without a tach either, but I also don't feel the need to look at it to shift. I bet if you had driven that Suzuki awhile and gotten used to it, you likely would be relying on the engine sound for shifting along with the other feedbacks.

    152. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by enantiomer2000 · · Score: 1

      I believe you made up this experiment in your head and it never happened.

    153. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Matter of fact quiet is a feature on luxury cars.

      So is power.

      The difference is that power is also a safety feature. False engine noise creates a false sense of power availability and even though it is unlikely to ever be required I recall a few times when real power availability has prevented an accident because someone else has not been paying attention to the road.

      From a petrol head's perspective though, I find quiet, powerful cars very desirable. I suspect this will be the real hidden feature of electric cars.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    154. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      Which is likely why electric car manufacturers are adding artificial noise at low speeds and letting tire noise handle it at higher speed. My Leaf emits a "strobing" sound below 18 MPH; above that, it stops on the assumption that the tire noise is enough.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    155. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      This "mandated" engine noise concept is so infuriating to me. We finally have the technology to remove both the air and noise pollution at the same time, but you want to add noise to an otherwise silent engine just because people aren't used to silent cars?

      Absolutely! Blind people use crossing and sighted people cross the road whenever and where ever they like usually without looking or with headphones in their ears. Having quiet cars is fantastic and mandating them to be noisy just because people are to insular to take responsibility for their own lives means a lot to people people who live in cities near noisy roads.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    156. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by impala · · Score: 1

      Unless you're blind, or happen to be looking the other way when the drunk in a prius bears down on you. Which is why some sort of fake engine noise will eventually be mandated (if it hasn't been already).

      Once a car is going more than 10 to 15 the tyre / road noise is way louder than the engine unless the car is a "sports" car. So adding noises to Prius / Tesla doesn't make much sense.

    157. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by buckfeta2014 · · Score: 1

      The Harley package used to be a super charger, but it's nothing more than a fascia package now.

      --
      Buck Feta. You know what to do.
    158. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Matheus · · Score: 1

      I was kinda thinking that satisfying whine of a Ferrari myself.

      Else:
      The pod racers from Episode 1
      Imperial March
      The Jaws sound
      Psycho Sound
      Batman theme song
      Chainsaw!
      Woody Allen mumbling random stuff occasionally including "I'm a car"
      Barking!

      Configurable based on mood :-)

    159. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Tire noise is not nearly as loud as you think it is

      Outside of first gear on an ICE, the noise of tires on the road will dominate the noise that any properly functioning modern vehicle is making. The tire noise is still very plainly audible on a car that is simply coasting with no engine running at all (which could be argued to be comparable to the noise level of a pure electric vehicle) at even surprisingly slow speeds... basically anything over about 15km/h or so.

      That said, tire noise rises logarithmically with speed, and at slow enough speeds, it can admittedly be difficult to hear. However, as the speed of the vehicle is reduced, the driver also gains much more time to react to anything that might be unexpected, and at speeds where the tire-on-road noise is genuinely not easily perceptible, the stopping distance can be well less than 10 feet (virtually zero in many cases) unless the road is icy (which incidentally tends to be noisier on tires than asphalt at a given speed anyways, and so is more likely to be heard anyways).

    160. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Duhavid · · Score: 2

      If that is true,then the implication is that pedestrians and cyclists are actively keeping from being hit.
      Which implies that most drivers are doing a poor job of paying consistent attention.

      As a driver, cyclist and pedestrian, I quite believe it.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    161. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      Hearing the engine is far more efficient. I have been training truck drivers for the last eight years. The impression of velocity can vary with a great many things, including road surface, wind, other traffic, etc. Engine sound is a far more accurate measure.

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
    162. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by sparcnut · · Score: 1

      Dibs on the BRM V16.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    163. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention: They spend a higher percentage of their time on the road in urban areas, where the pedestrians and cyclists are.

    164. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Sique · · Score: 1

      It gets even worse. BMW got 1300 HP out of a 1.5 litre 4cyl in 1986. It was the "qualification" setting on their Formula 1 race engines for the Brabham team built into the Brabham BT55.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    165. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agree if we are talking about fake noise piped into the cabin to make the car sound louder.

      My BMW M235 does this and it really pisses me off that I can't disable it without hacking. Makes me wish I had bought a (very similar) Audi S3 which does have and enable / disable for engine sounds in the in-cabin settings. In the M235 the noise seems connected to the "sport" steering and shifting program (though their documentation doesn't admit it of course).

      Great plan BMW - you've succeeded in making one of your customers feel like an idiot, a great way to boost future sales. There is this new thing called and "internet" were people share information - you should read up on it. It means that you can't keep things like this secret .

      "Safety" noises on electric cards are an entirely different issue.

    166. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Yeah well, that's because a turbo dampens the sound as the turbine pulls energy form the exhaust pressure (by design). So these kids are opening up the backend to make it "fart" a lot louder.

      From an exhaust note perspective, a NA engine sounds much better if it's tuned right. It's also important to take advantage of the scavenging effect for increase performance too.

      This, there's a reason a Lamborghini or Aston Martin sounds so fantastic.

      However for those of us who aren't millionaires, there are lower end cars that can produce great sounds. The sporty Honda's of yesteryear used to be called "4 cylinder Ferraris" because of the sound they produced when revved to 8 or 9000 RPM. A K20 in a DC5 or Civic Type R was one of the few really good sounding cars of the 00's that were affordable.

      As for tubros. I think the induction and the turbo spool noise is better than the exhaust noise. Its nicer to hear the whine of the turbo spinning up. When I bought my Nissan 200sx (that would be an S15 as it's a ADM model) it had a huge fart cannon catback on it. I'm looking at putting the stock pipe and muffler back on because it just sounds like crap and I'm getting a bit old to have garish boy racer parts on my daily (yes, I know Silvias are the epitome of boy racer cars).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    167. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      I wonder if we'll be able to buy "exhaust tones" like we do ringtones? It might actually be amusing if you could download a $1.99 file from the iTunes store to make your Prius have the "exhaust" sounds of a Lamborghini. And by "amusing" I mean "a big steaming pile of suck". FFS people, we've been trying to cut down on noise pollution for decades! We finally have a good way to get rid of a large chunk of it and now we have people whining about it!

      I swear... if any car I buy comes with this crap, there'd better be a way to turn it off. Otherwise, I'd be looking to find a way to make the (external) speakers play a non-stop mix of Katy Perry, Rebecca Black, and Hanson; so as to have at least a little bit of revenge against the luddite brigade for making my car more noisy than it properly should be.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    168. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Honestly, most modern cars these days are already so silent, the only sound you hear from them is the cooling fan and the tire noise.

      Modern cars?

      I had an EJ Civic (that was the 94-98 sedan model) with a B16B (yep VTEC yo) engine and you wouldn't even hear the cooling fan unless it was over 40 Celsius. Road noise was the biggest thing and even that was muted by the soundproofing... And when I owned this car it was 15 years old.

      To be honest, I heard more road noise in a 2013 Hyundai I30 than in my old Civic (but to be fair, I'm comparing the most budget Korean car to the top model Civic made before the Asian Financial Crisis).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    169. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by moogaloonie · · Score: 2

      Gee, I thought the sound of the engine was also part of the UI... First it tells me the car is running. The sound of the engine revving higher indicates increased load, obvious when you are climbing a hill, but not as obvious as leaving your parking brake on. From the sound of the engine you can tell when the air conditioner has kicked on, when your fuel is sub-optimum, how tight the belts are etc. I wouldn't want to be dependent on an internal combustion engine I couldn't hear operating.

    170. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      And to the audiophiles the fake engine noise isn't pure unless it comes through a McIntosh tube amp

    171. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I've driven plenty of modern automatics. And modern manuals.

      I still can get significantly better gas mileage in a MT than an auto (no matter what the EPA ratings say... those are dumb anyway because they mandate shift points).

      This, and the smaller the engine the bigger the difference.

      Realistically, nothing can be trusted when it comes to government mandated car ratings, there are lies, damn lies, statistics and EPA ratings (same with ANCAP, ENCAP, NACAP, they're all gamed to the point where they dont reflect reality any more, a 2 seater car gets points removed for not having a rear seatbelt warning light when there are no rear seats).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    172. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Smauler · · Score: 1

      I drive a 1.8 litre 4 pot normally aspirated Japanese 4 seat hatchback, mainly because it didn't cost much (£2,500, used obviously), it is reliable (1 major breakdown in 5 years), hasn't cost anything for basic maintenance (2 new full set of tyres for £100 a set in 5 years, literally no oil except for services (it doesn't lose any)), and can get 30mpg or so.

      It also does 0-60 in 6 point something seconds or so, has a top speed of 150, and sounds amazing naturally.

      I don't treat it right, either. I play with lift off oversteer a lot, and rev the engine to 9000 rpm or so when accelerating.

      Now the bad : It's useless as a long distance cruiser, it sits at over 4000rpm in 5th gear at 70mph, it hasn't got a 6th, if you want good mpg you're going to have to sit at 50. Added to that, it is more noisy because it's got lots of sound insulation stripped from it as standard. Also, insurance isn't that great either, I'm currently paying £400 or so (which is a lot, because I'm almost the lowest risk there is). That's about it.

      Integra Type R DC2. I bought it because it sounds amazing. I kept it because it was.

      LOL, there's an advertising slogan if ever I heard one.

    173. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      That's like saying being able to put a radio next to your computer and tell how busy it is and maybe what it is doing by listening to the signal on an open channel is part of the Windows UI.

      " I wouldn't want to be dependent on an internal combustion engine I couldn't hear operating."

      Well in this case you aren't hearing an engine operate, you are hearing are sound effects that may or may not reflect what the engine is doing.

    174. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      some people in their focus groups didn't like it because it *sounds* different.

      I have a Nissan with a CVT and I love it. If you pay attention to it, it does sound different, but once your on the road with all of the other road noise it's too quiet to hear. I don't know if 'normal' engine sounds include the transmission, so it is odd to think about the transmission making noise.

    175. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Smauler · · Score: 1

      For driving a manual car the engine noise serves a purpose too, but it's getting more and more rare even here in Europe.

      To be fair, automatics have been getting better and better recently. Most new lorries are automatic (I learnt with a 16 speed gearbox on my HGV test, though). As long as there's a separate test in the UK for automatics and manuals, most people will take the manual test. There's talk of allowing HGV tests being allowed to be taken in automatics currently, though.

      Note that anyone taking their HGV test will already have passed their car test in a manual.

    176. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Well the thing is, cylingers are a bit like testicles. Real men have 6, not 4.

      But at what expense? I'm serious and not just torking you around.

    177. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by DragonWyatt · · Score: 1

      The day that two of the most efficiency-bound on-road ICE applications (cross-country 18-wheel trucking and NASCAR racing) switch to automatic transmissions is the day I'll consider one for my personal vehicle.

      --
      Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
    178. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Smauler · · Score: 1

      NA and turbo engines sound different, but they're both awesome.

      I drive an Integra type R, 1.8 litre NA, and I don't mind if it "farts" once in a while. This is not because it's not "tuned right".

    179. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Smauler · · Score: 1

      No one *needs* to hear the engine noise to know when to shift. Feeling the car's velocity and knowing what gear one's in is sufficient information most of the time.

      Tell me exactly how one "feels the cars velocity"? When you're going a set speed, there is no feeling at all. Relying on a change of direction to tell you which way to steer is awkward.

      If you meant visual cues (but didn't say it), they can be less useful in lots of circumstances. I personally know corners by aural engine speed and other feedback, and learning them again in a different car is different.

    180. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      NASCAR racing is not about efficiency, it's about restricting all the participants to using ancient technology so they can supposedly see who the better driver is without making it a tech-fest like F1 racing. Modern DSG gearboxes were largely pioneered in F1 racing. And even there, where they don't share the same concerns about technology as the primitive people in NASCAR, they still made restrictions so that gear changes weren't made automatically by software; from Wikipedia: "After concerns that the technology allowed software engineers to pre-program the cars to automatically change to the optimum gear according to the position on the track, without any driver intervention, a standardized software system was mandated, ensuring the gears would only change up or down when instructed to by the driver. Buttons on the steering wheel, which go directly to a certain gear—rather than sequentially—are still permitted."

      18-wheelers don't have them because 1) automatics can only handle so much torque, so for an application like this involving so much torque, it's a lot cheaper and easier to just a manual with a semi-tractor, and 2) trucks spend most of their time on the highway where gear changing isn't necessary so much. (Plus they don't care much about accelerating quickly on the highway like car buyers do.)

      The other thing you're missing is that both these applications involve professional drivers. Your average car driver cannot shift more efficiently than a computer, and if you really think you're the equal of an F1 driver, then you're a fool.

      Lastly, it probably won't be long before manual transmissions are gone in semi-tractors. They've been gone in heavy construction equipment for ages now, because they all went to serial-hybrid-electic drivetrains. Trucks are going to go the same way because of efficiency concerns, and there simply won't be a transmission.

    181. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Wow, either you're a terrible driver or you have no idea of the length of a second.

      I have never so far met an automatic gearbox that shifts as quickly as I do (and I'm not even using a short-shifter or anything), met quite a few that lag terribly and met none at all that were able to select the gear I needed ahead of time.

      That's not to say fast shifting automatics don't exist but they're on better cars than I have driven. DSG does sound interesting and will likely be on my next car (VW have apparently abandoned the manual gearbox in the US). I have driven a regular automatic VW or two and they are no better (or worse) than others.

    182. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      >That's not to say fast shifting automatics don't exist but they're on better cars than I have driven.

      Then you need to send your 1985 Chrysler to the junkyard and get something a little more modern, especially something with a DSG (Fords, VWs, Audis) or a CVT (Suburu).

    183. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I like how quiet the exhaust on my turbocharged Saab is. I do wish the turbocharger weren't so muffled by the intake though. That high-pitched whoosh followed by a pssst! is awesome!

      My ZR-1 has a Borla exhaust. Too loud. I liked the stock exhaust which was loud only when I got on it beyond moderate throttle, but driving normally, very deep exhaust note yet subtle.

      Right now I am driving a rental while my Saab is in the shop (heater blower quit. Grr.) - I swear it has a fake engine sound. It's a Hyundai Elantra which can barely get out of its own way yet quite a roar inside. >_>

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    184. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by kimvette · · Score: 1
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    185. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      These were typically "this year's model" mid-size cars from the Emerald Aisle at National.

    186. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Pff. I installed mahogany fuel rail covers made from endangered Madagascarian rain forest wood that allows my VW to emit a fabulous mechanical orgasm of sound to those lucky enough to hear it.

      Spend 4 grand on those absolutely divine auto acoustic enhancements.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    187. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      It's another example of things being faked to emulate what people are used to.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    188. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The Mazda Miata (1989) had an exhaust system carefully designed to sound like a cheap 1960s English sports car.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    189. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Modern engines have rev limiters.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    190. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The "living room on wheels" concept died 50 years ago.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    191. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you don't like the sound of a nicely tuned motorcycle engine too, right?

      All of us don't need to bother other people just to confirm our own existence. Which is what noisy engines ultimately amount to.

      Also, it's hard to take concepts like "nicely tuned motorcycle engine" seriously when the first image that comes to mind is a high schooler who's moped gets 2 hp at 200 decibels.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    192. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Your the exact kind of asshat the proves why new laws should be implemented to reduce the sounds vehicles make at their exhaust.

      Where did you get the impression that I'd be doing what I said with my car that would be outside the bounds of current laws and noise issues?

      I'm talking about restoring a car that was and would be perfectly legal, it also just happens to sound really good. It isn't like I'd be running straight pipes like one would at a race track...geez, lighten up Francis.

      What I'm talking about driving is certainly less loud and obnoxious that those that drive around in cars with sound systems at full blast, constructed by those that I guess have no concept of midrange and highs, only bass..pumping out rap shit music at 1200dB and rattling peoples homes for a 4x block radius.

      Lemme guess, you hate legally constructed and outfitted motorcycles too, right?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    193. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Hippies jumping in front of priuses?

    194. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      Honestly, most modern cars these days are already so silent, the only sound you hear from them is the cooling fan and the tire noise. It is only the 'muscle' type cars, that make noise, and like the article says, its just because people expect them to. Hell, the 'Harley Davidson' edition Ford F150 magically sounds like a motorcycle, because they can make it sound any damn way they want now. I agree, the idea of mandating 'fake engine noise' is preposterous, because its pretending this is a new problem, when cars have already been nearly dead silent at parking lot speeds for years now.

      You made a very good point, all cars should have some sort of directional warning sound at parking lot speeds.

    195. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      Rev Limiters only work on acceleration, but don't prevent over-reving due to downshifting. Try doing 80mph and downshift to 2nd gear, your rev limiter won't stop it from spinning to some extreme RPM, and probably breaking things with it.

      In addition to that, it's usually not good to drive around bouncing off the rev limiter on a normal basis.

    196. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by kazekirifx · · Score: 1

      Then everyone would know that it isn't real. And that would take away all the fun, wouldn't it?

    197. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by otuz · · Score: 1

      Well, someone who wants a modern car isn't buying an american V8 anyway.

    198. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      That would be a lot of circuitry for an edge case that might never occur...
      And on top of that, most people don't know or notice that this happens.....

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    199. Re: Just give the option to turn it off... by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      I own a 2000 BMW 328i, and I can testify to the blink rate differential on that year and model.
      It is 15 years old ( it's "birthday" is this month! ), so I don't know if it qualifies as "modern" or not.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    200. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a pedestrian, you're supposed to be walking opposite traffic. If cars are coming up behind you instead of approaching in front of you, you're doing it wrong.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    201. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      The malfunctioning of the noise making device may not be illegal (or less illegal) than not having the noise making device. So nobody ever services noise making devices, car manufacturers attach progressively worse noise making devices which are more and more prone to failure.

      Eventually people get used to silent fast moving large hard solid objects moving about the streets.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    202. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      having a doctored engine noise inside the car is unlikely to help much the blind people who are outside the car..

      anyhow, it doesn't need that much speed that the tire noise overcomes engine noise.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    203. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I really have to wonder about bikers who like a throbbing object beneath their nether regions, those motor bikes shake object hundreds of feet away, why do bikers desperately need those objects between their legs, are they missing something? Obviously the sound is unnecessary, as such vehicle noise laws should be reduced. Desperate for loud throbbing objects get the appropriate tool insert it and wear headphones with the volume cranked up. There is no sane reason why you should be allowed to force you hobby upon tens of thousands of other people as you drive down roads. Want to have fun, fine have fun but consider others and the ramifications of noise pollution in a crowded world. Not really picking on you as you very likely are not driving down my road, I am of course aggrieved by moronic Harley Davidson riders who are riding down my road and it seems there is no sound reason behind that sound.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    204. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      I'm also a cyclist, but I don't think engine noise is that critical. I get a lot of info about where a car is behind me from the noise that it makes, but the majority of that is the noise of tyres on the road. Engine noise is only useful in warning me when someone is aggressively accelerating (presumably to overtake).

      Also, it's perfectly legal for deaf people to drive cars and ride bikes, so relying on sounds for safety doesn't work for everyone.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    205. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      You know what would be nice? If they could make the Mustang or F-150 sound like a Tesla. Now that would be something I would pay extra for.

    206. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Even at 10 mph you can clearly hear the tires of an electric car. Especially blind people who usually have excellent hearing.

      Now, of course, if you compare an electric car to a Ford Mustang, people are probably more likely to notice the sound of the latter. Compare it to a Rolls Royce, though, and you'll find a much smaller difference if any at all. They'll have us add noise to electric cars to actually let them noisier than some conventional cars, it's ridiculous.

      Please, can we just have quieter roads? Does everything have to make noise all the time to warn the idiots who don't pay attention? I would just like to hear the birds sing.

    207. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it is only because the cities are so drowned in noise from other cars. Once all cars are quiet, the problem will solve itself (you can still hear them enough when its quiet). But if you mandate noise on them, it'll never happen. A quiet city would be awesome, particularly if you've ever lived near a busy road.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    208. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Invalidator · · Score: 1

      I ride the bus.

      --

      ~_~ Not tonight, dear, I have a modem.

    209. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      I understand Formula 1 gets a lot more power, but I don't think their engines can pass street-legal emissions testing. The Koenigsegg, as far as I know, has.

    210. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by cjonslashdot · · Score: 1
    211. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Turbo Button on a PC.

    212. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by StatureOfLiberty · · Score: 1

      They all complained that the sound wasn't pure enough without Monster cables delivering the full spectrum of "whooshiness" to the speakers.

      I heard that they couldn't use oxygen free copper because it made the engine stall.

    213. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      >Go to Europe and you'll see the automatic/manual dynamic flipped. American drivers are lazier. They can barely be bothered to use their turn signals much less shift a manual.

      That's irrelevant, we're talking about cars with both manual and automatic options, and for the manuals, the small subset of Americans who do like to drive them. I'm fairly sure they don't put different gear ratios in the manual models in Europe.

    214. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This still doesn't make sense. The Powershift (which is just Ford's name for DSG, which is still an "automatic", it just uses clutches and two transmissions that look like manuals mechanically, but are shifted by computer, or optionally by the driver using paddles) is still getting better highway mileage, which is not because of shifting competence but because of gear ratios, since you don't normally need to shift a lot when driving on the highway. The anticipation factor you speak of is only a factor when driving at lower, varying speeds, not cruising on the highway with the cruise control set.

      Note also that CVT transmissions are also "automatics" (even though, again, mechanically, they have little in common with a traditional automatic), and here again I'm pretty sure Suburus are showing better MPG across the board with theirs.

    215. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by praxis · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between more or less efficient and necessary (impossible to do without). It is perfectly possible to drive a manual car without a tachometer and with a quiet engine. Millions of people do it every hour.

    216. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by pebear · · Score: 1

      I have a 1999 Dodge Ram 1500 and it has a 318 engine in it. That engine has been around since 1967 and ended production in 2002. I put duel glasspacks on my truck just to make sure I had a good MOPAR rumble going on under my truck.

      --
      Paul E. Bahre
    217. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by ddd0004 · · Score: 1

      Great. "Ringtones" for cars. I'm not even a doomsday prepper, but I'll move to an underground bunker just to avoid a freeway of cars pumping out a mix of Pitbull, Justin Beiber and the bro-country flavor of the week

    218. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by kmoser · · Score: 1

      I would prefer the KITT scanner sound: http://youtu.be/VNtlGfHCrEs?t=...

    219. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Velocity stack intake is sweet on a roadster too.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    220. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I'm not discounting that modern technology hasn't drastically improved efficiency in automatic transmissions. I'm sure it has. I'm just saying that manuals have the ability of being more efficient by virtue of being simpler and lighter.

      The added weight of the actuating devices in an automatic will lower your efficiency if nothing else. I understand that they've come a long way, but there are *still* losses when automating things. All things being equal, the manual transmission simply has to be more efficient, if for no other reason than it weighs less, so for a highway trip with the same payload over the same road, manual will win, even if by a very little bit.

      Now if you don't drive the manual correctly and don't choose perfect shift points, you might induce more inefficiency than an automatic, but that's about driving habits and skill and not the efficiency of the transmission. Plus it may be that for city driving, no human can be accurate enough with the shift points to stay within an automatic computer controlled modern automatic, but again that's about the ability of the operator, but on the highway with the cruse control set, a manual will be better.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    221. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Builder · · Score: 1

      Could you setup some meetings with thousands of town and city planners around the world and let them know that - thanks!

    222. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by wv5k · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this guy UP!

    223. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      If you're looking at things like the weight of a solenoid capable of actuating a transmission as a significant impact on mileage vs an otherwise identical manual transmission then you're just reaching for things to support your original argument in the face of new evidence.

      The difference in mass between different drivers is going to vary far more than the delta between a modern "manumatic" and a manual.

      They're not the big heavy oil-filled lumps that they used to be.

    224. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Or the driver's doing it way wrong. Or it's a one-way road.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    225. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by McFly777 · · Score: 1

      I had a 1992 Integra GS-R when I graduated and got my first engineering job. I had to get rid of it when I had my second child as the child seats wouldn't fit.
      **sniff** I miss that car. . .

      The only problem with it was when both the wife was in the car and the air-conditioning was on, at which point you had two choices accelerating from a stop: either you didn't put quite enough gas in and it was dog slow, or you put just a little more at which point you lit the tires. There really was no happy medium with it. The third option was to momentarily hit the A/C button off, accelerate reasonably but still energetically, and then push it back on once you were done shifting.

      --

      McFly777
      - - -
      "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
    226. Re: Just give the option to turn it off... by DariusMacSean · · Score: 1

      OK--like to see some research on what % of the annual 40,000 MV deaths (Including hapless pedestrians) would have been prevented by the ridiculous throaty decibles little boy-men apparently require for a symbolic erection. Grow up & read some statistics. Or--just read. Vroom! Vroom!

    227. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by suutar · · Score: 1

      would it not be simpler to say "that one got vetoed so it was never an active law" than just saying "there was never such a law" and inviting argument?

    228. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Just because someone conducted a study doesn't mean the results are valid. Many if not most published studies have serious methodological weaknesses.

    229. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by pepty · · Score: 1

      It's more about the sound of a four cylinder turbo engine being annoying as hell. People hate teenage kids with fart boxes on their mom's civic for a reason. A lower exhaust note is more pleasant to the human ear.

      Also, anyone driving a manual, or even an auto-manual, needs to hear the engine to know when to shift, because they can't be staring at the tachometer when driving.

      A lower exhaust note isn't as annoying as a screechy one - but it sure isn't pleasant to the human ear if the human is trying to have a conversation and can't because the diesel pickup outside (on the other side of a closed dual pane window ) has a coffee can instead of a muffler.

    230. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Sique · · Score: 1
      You probably could even get the BMW turbo engine street legal with lots of exhaust filtering, but that was not the point I was trying to make. Yes, the BMW engine was consuming immense amounts of gas, it was extremely noisy, and it would a bad idea to build it into a normal street car, as it had a high probability to break within the next 1000 miles.

      But in general, getting more sheer power out of a certain engine size or configuration is not so much of an engineering problem (e.g. just add lots of chargers, and don't forget the cooling). It's more of a design decision if you want to have better all day behaviour and more stability under load, or if you want more impressive data sheet numbers. You surely can tune the Bugatti W16 to put out 1300 or 1400 hp and still being street legal, but what's the point? Koenigsegg decided to go a more extreme route, getting more power out of their engine, knowing well that their cars won't be used in the daily commute anyway.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    231. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by geoffrey195 · · Score: 1

      For some, having engine noise is fine. However, the '70s and '80s with the purring V8s are gone, and the vehicles that will be the norm will either be hybrids, diesels, or electric cars.

      As someone who likes modern cars, we don't need any more noise added. In fact, there is something nice about a Tesla or Prius's silence at idle.

      This is very nice and really appreciating. you can also see at the site for more information.

    232. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      Yes, all those blind drivers need tactile feedback on the turn signal.

      I see what you did there....

      but they don't!

    233. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      Monster truck? Monster cables!

    234. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      Old news Done already back in the mid 80's- early 90's with active noise cancellation to first remove the noise and then added noise to make the demo car sound like a variety from Ferraris to VW beetles

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    235. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      My impression - and I'm no automotive engineer or even able to do more than change a tire - is that the automakers must be getting better at obtaining good all day behavior and stability under load from smaller engines with forced induction. Volkswagen (and Audi), BMW, and Mercedes have all replaced larger V8s with smaller turbocharged or supercharged V8s or six cylinder engines over the past few years. Ford's last GT super-car used a supercharged 5.4 liter engine, while the one they just revealed at the 2015 Detroit auto show makes more power (final numbers not announced yet) from a new version of the twin turbocharged V6 Ford looks like they're trying to use everywhere.

    236. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by doccus · · Score: 1

      I don't see what kind of "dirty" secret it is. Those same types of audiophiles work for every supercar manufacturer including Ferrari, Koenigsegg, McLaren etc, which ALL have an extensive amount of tweaking to get the "right" sound out of the engine, including every trick in the book...

    237. Re: Just give the option to turn it off... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Even more so on modern cars, where the current fashion is to bury the instruments deep into pods for some reason.

    238. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Maybe the clicking is drowned out by all the fake engine noise trying to cover up the four-banger motor screaming at 4000 RPM?

    239. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Nope. Automatics have had lock-up torque converters for most of my life; I remember them being in cars in the 80s. According to Wikipedia, they first appeared in 1949, but only saw widespread use in the late 70s due to fuel economy concerns. But only recently have automatics gotten better highway fuel economy (or even equal) than manuals.

    240. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That, and the auto's final overdrive gear is often has a lower ratio than the manual's final gear. This allows the car to run at a lower RPM on the freeway which is why you'll see the manual version get better mileage in the city but the auto wins on the freeway. I'm not sure why they do this, unless they think that people don't like downshifting to pass. To make this somewhat on-topic, this also has the side effect that the auto version is also quieter on the freeway.

    241. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      At low speeds such as would be encountered in a parking lot or congested city street the engine noise is dominant, particularly because the car is doing a lot of accelerating and decelerating. At those speeds I think a modest synthesized engine sound is a very good idea, especially when you consider blind people and even more especially service dogs

      My experience is that in car parks, you can hear the tire noise easily. If the only problem is the visually impaired, why not put the synthesized sound above the range of human hearing, so that only guide dogs and assistive devices can detect it?

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    242. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If your automatic dies in the middle of an intersection, can you put it in gear and crank the starter to move it? Didn't think so.

      You don't need to do that. Put it in neutral and push it, fat-ass.

      If your car is dying in the middle of an intersection, it's time to take it to the junkyard and buy something newer than a 1985 model.

      Can you get an automatic with a dead battery rolling down a hill, pop the clutch, and start it? Didn't think so.

      Try that in any manual-transmission car made in the last 15 years and get back to me. It won't work.

      Plus, manual transmissions serve as an anti-theft device. There are numerous accounts of theives breaking into cars, finding a stick shift there, and not being able to drive it, fleeing the scene on-foot.

      If the car they're stealing is a model which is hot and frequently comes with a manual (i.e. any sports car, "sport compact", etc.), this isn't a problem for the thief. Thieves targeting those cars know how to drive them.

    243. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      My biggest complaint about automatics is they really want to go when you don't want them to. I hate it when a car wants to accelerate like mad without your foot on the fuel pedal, especially when going downhill, and I'll take a handbrake over a hill-holding transmission any day. Even with a drive-by-wire fuel pedal, a manual transmission gives a lot more confidence that you're driving the car and not the other way around.

      Despite major changes over the years to improve responsiveness, shifting, and adding more gears, automatics simply don't perform logically. Forget paddle shifters -- if automatics had a "manual mode" which allowed the car to coast downhill or only move when your foot was on the fuel, I'd tolerate them much better (even if I still wouldn't want to own one for way more reasons than I care to list).

    244. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "In fact, there is something nice about a Tesla or Prius's silence at idle."

      These things are "too quiet" in parking lots. The Nissan Leaf has a noisemaker at the front which activates below 15mph (it can be disabled)

      The only downside is that it's a whizzing sound akin to alternator whine. I wanted it to sound like George Jetson's flying car.

    245. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      That said, in some cards it is difficult to tell if it is even on, causing you to try the ignition again. Also some seem to have a delay start, probably the hybrids, which is also confusing. So there is some practical sense to engine noise should you want/need it outside of making your engine sound all beefy. Car modders been doing that for many years with custom exhaust (many of which are ridiculous), so this isn't anything that is really new.

    246. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Then, one day you get distracted and don't see or hear the car backing out and CRUNCH! You become the one with the handicap.

    247. Re:Just give the option to turn it off... by nobodie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my volt is so quiet that it has a special little horn to tab for a "beep-beep" in parking lots to warn people. The only thing I dislike more than the "meaty rumble" is the stink of the exhaust.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
  2. Then there's the old performance trick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've seen people drill holes in their muffler and think they have a Maserati.

    1. Re:Then there's the old performance trick... by beelsebob · · Score: 2

      There's only so much energy in the exhaust though, and that level has been steadily diminishing, especially with the advent of modern small turbo engines.

      Just look at modern F1 cars. They're getting nearly 900 horse power out of a 1.6l turbo (plus hybrid system), and the engines are so quiet you hear tire scrub over them, even with racing slick tires.

    2. Re:Then there's the old performance trick... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      All you proved was that you were a moron who talks about things you don't understand.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Then there's the old performance trick... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the new F1 engines truly suck. They need to give them back 20K RPM.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Then there's the old performance trick... by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Actually, in terms of rev range, F1 engines and street engines aren't too dissimilar. F1 engines can rev to 15000rpm, but they're designed not to, because the fuel flow is not allowed to increase above 10500rpm. Because of that, they're designed to run at between 8000 and 12000rpm most of the time. Modern road car small turbos tend to rev up to 8000rpm. They're a little separate, but not as much as the 15000rpm rev limit on an F1 engine makes it seem.

      The thing that differs on the F1 engine is actually the compression ratio they're expected to endure, and the size and speed of the turbo charger. The turbos carry so much energy that they have to have ballistic shields installed around them in case one fails. That of course is why the engine then ends up so quiet - all the exhaust energy goes into spinning a massive turbo up to 150,000rpm.

  3. Splits the community in half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some guys are in it for the power, and thus the engine noise is wasted energy.
    Some guys are in it for the feel, and thus the engine noise is the most important thing about the car.

    1. Re:Splits the community in half by andydread · · Score: 1

      yeah i know at least one "ricer" you won't outpace.

    2. Re:Splits the community in half by hey! · · Score: 1

      If you play a synthesized noise back through the car's sound system the energy wasted is negligible. And arguably, anything that serves a purpose isn't wasted, so long as it is done with minimum energy needed.

      I actually kind of like the idea of synthesized sounds. Think of it as being like haptic feedback. Anyone who's ever driven a car with an exhaust leak knows the powerful illusion it creates that the car's engine has lost power. So why not use sound to convey feedback about what the car is doing -- in this case using lots more gasoline.

      In fact I'd take it further. If the oil is low or past due for changing, why not pipe valve tapping sounds into the passenger compartment? Or if the pressure of a tire drops maybe impart a thrum to the steering wheel.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    3. Re:Splits the community in half by hey! · · Score: 1

      An exhaust leak makes a car sound much, much LOUDER. How the heck does that give the impression that it has become less powerful?

      I'll give you a hint. It begins with the letter "p" and rhymes with "mycology".

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Splits the community in half by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Right. And if you miss the scheduled maintenance tick, the radio stays on and only plays episodes of 'Car Talk' until you take it to the dealer to reset it.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Splits the community in half by Zibodiz · · Score: 1

      I'd buy that car.

    6. Re:Splits the community in half by ravenscar · · Score: 1

      Does he live his life a quarter mile at a time?

    7. Re:Splits the community in half by andydread · · Score: 1

      I think OP was talking about ricers pulling up next to him on the street. That was what I was referring to. If we're talking about 1/4 mile then I know quite a few so called "ricers" that would outpace him there also.

    8. Re:Splits the community in half by ravenscar · · Score: 1

      Ha - I was just making a bad Fast and Furious joke.

      As someone who has heavily modified a few Japanese cars, I'm well aware of what "ricers" are capable. There is a great Top Gear episode where the crew take 3 super cars to the drag strip in Vegas. They get schooled in the quarter by a bunch of modified cars. It's fun to watch.

    9. Re:Splits the community in half by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

      Sweet, then this is a problem easy to solve.

      The second set of guys we can give an MP3 of classic cars, they don't even have to be on the road to enjoy it, and leave the rest of us in peace.

    10. Re:Splits the community in half by houghi · · Score: 1

      To those for whom the sound is important:
      I do not care if the sound is important to you. It is not important to everybody, yet everybody has to hear it.
      If sound is so important to you, have headphones on when you drive. Have an app that you can hear all the (fake) revs of the car next to you for all I care.

      It should not be to hard to make a lot of noise inside of your car. Just buy a bluetooth OBDII device and write a program for any device (including a Raspberry Pi) that can produce sound.

      But do not enforce what you want onto me when there is no reason to do so.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Splits the community in half by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

      I've always said that I drive a hybrid.

      Burns gas and rubber ;-).

    12. Re:Splits the community in half by johncandale · · Score: 1

      I actually kind of like the idea of synthesized sounds. Think of it as being like haptic feedback.

      Hmm, got me thinking. Could I get synthesized sounds for the bedroom or backseat so if I am dating a quiet female, I get the feedback of porn star moaning? Making me feel like a rockstar?

      Also why ever leave the the house at all, you can fake everything and pretend you have a good life.

  4. Awesome idea by codepigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you make my car produce the sound of the Jetson's flying car? I would pay for that!

    1. Re:Awesome idea by Pope+Hagbard · · Score: 2

      I'd rather have a car that plays Nyan Cat to pedestrians.

    2. Re:Awesome idea by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Next up: Car Ringtones.

      I'm going to set mine to sound like the TARDIS.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:Awesome idea by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

      You can still buy car PA systems, even Radio Shack has them. Amusingly enough the first Google hit for a discussion of their legality I came across was at AR15.com...

    4. Re:Awesome idea by Kevoco · · Score: 2
    5. Re:Awesome idea by operagost · · Score: 2

      I vote K.I.T.T., although I rode in a 1987 Buick GN once and it actually sounded a lot like that.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Awesome idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have a car that plays Nyan Cat to pedestrians.

      Extra points if it poops rainbows out its exhaust pipe.

    7. Re:Awesome idea by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      And "It's a Small World" to cyclists.

    8. Re:Awesome idea by dlingman · · Score: 1

      Are we going to have limits on what is an acceptable noise? Otherwise, I can see a race between the fart generators and the "When sally met harry fake orgasm" clips.

      A race to the bottom.

    9. Re:Awesome idea by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Hamsterdance.

  5. What about those of us who like quiet cars by edtice1559 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can we turn it off? If not, they are spending a lot of money on something that would add negative value for guys like me. The reason I don't ride a motorcycle or even keep the convertible top open on the highway is that I can't stand the noise and have no interest in going deaf.

    1. Re:What about those of us who like quiet cars by cruff · · Score: 1

      Give me a quiet car any day of the week. It's wonderful to be able to have a conversation at 80 MPH without having to shout at each other.

      Hmm, my 13 year old SUV is quiet enough inside at 80 MPH to have a conversation without shouting. Seems like you just have to buy one that is quiet, regardless of the power source.

    2. Re:What about those of us who like quiet cars by karnal · · Score: 1

      Motorcycles don't inherently have to be noisy. In fact, from the dealer floor - most harleys are pretty tame. (note: not a harley rider, and I detest anyone who thinks loud pipes save lives. No. No they don't.)

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:What about those of us who like quiet cars by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      No, you mostly can't turn it off, although one automaker is going to let you not only do that, but also let you select your engine noise. Kia, I think? Just announced.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:What about those of us who like quiet cars by cruff · · Score: 1

      Let's get out a decibel meter and compare. I guarantee my Lincoln Hybrid will beat the pants off your SUV in an objectively measured sound level test.

      I didn't say that it would be absolutely quieter than your snooty hybrid :-), but just that it is possible to hold a conversation while seated within with the windows closed without having to yell while driving on the highway at 80 MPH. And I also did not state anything about the sound pressure levels as measured outside the vehicle as it passes.

    5. Re:What about those of us who like quiet cars by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      Smart motorcyclists WEAR EAR PLUGS! Trust me. Not everyone wants to go deaf. You might think "Oh but i can't hear impending danger", but you can, you just won't fatigue from the insane wind noise, your own engine noise, and of course traffic.

    6. Re:What about those of us who like quiet cars by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Wind noise alone is enough to damage hearing. As poster below mentions, earplugs are the answer.

    7. Re:What about those of us who like quiet cars by karnal · · Score: 1

      Agreed; I recently started wearing earplugs on my fairly silent bike due to wind noise. Very shocked with just how fatigued my ears would get on a 3+ hour ride prior.

      --
      Karnal
  6. LOL ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, this is bee-sting lips, but for cars?

    Pure artifice to match an arbitrary aesthetic, and nothing at all to do with reality?

    LOL ... But, honey, the car doesn't make my penis bigger if it doesn't make that sound.

    The idea of running the vroom vroom sounds through the car stereo to sound more manly is ... well, kinda funny.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:LOL ... by njnnja · · Score: 1

      No no no...clearly you need some kind of further explanation, perhaps a metaphor, or even an analogy, using some kind of personal transportation technology in order for this to make sense. I am sure that one of the many knowledgeable commenters on this site will provide one shortly.

    2. Re:LOL ... by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      The penis and the vroom vroom noises didn't work for you?

      OK, this is like putting pink plastic hubcaps on your crappy car ... it doesn't go faster, it doesn't change the fact that your car is a complete pile of crap, but somehow it conveys that you're now a "car guy", and can get some play from the hunnies.

      This is exactly like cheap spinners, except, um, with sound.

      Possibly like looking at your penis with a magnifying glass ... sure, from a certain perspective it might look better, but you're not fooling anybody, and people will still laugh at you.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    3. Re:LOL ... by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      LOL ... But, honey, the car doesn't make my penis bigger if it doesn't make that sound.

      ... and it can't make that sound without Monster Cables!

      Monster Cables: what can't they embiggen?

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    4. Re:LOL ... by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      The idea of running the vroom vroom sounds through the car stereo to sound more manly is ... well, fucking hilarious.

      FTFY and I say that as a guy that owned a '69 Catalina some years ago and loved the sound of it. I am fully capable of liking loud cars and silent cars. But a quiet car trying to sound loud, especially by using the stereo to enhance engine noise is a huge joke.

    5. Re:LOL ... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      This isn't new. When electric lawn mowers first came out, people complained about their lack of power. Adding some noise made it sound a lot stronger.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  7. oh good grief by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new. The 'exhaust sound' was part of the design criteria of the 1st Gen Mazda Miata. Trying to recreate British sports cars (Lotus).

    1. Re:oh good grief by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      And that's hardly a secret. Designing a pleasant engine and exhaust sound has been around forever and everyone (appliance manufacturers excluded) is doing it. What is fairly new however is straight up faking it by playing pre-recorded audio through the sound system. At this point I think it's time to give up and admit that you're in a crappy 3-cylinder diesel shitbox that sounds like a tractor.

    2. Re:oh good grief by fermion · · Score: 1
      The Miata is a highly tuned engined with a highly tuned exhaust system in an attempt to create a pleasant engine noise experience.

      What we are talking about here is noise for those who need others to notice them. Who buy the big truck or the loud motorcycle because they do not get enough attention at home.

      This of course is different from an electric car which needs fake noise so that others are not startled.

      In any case the Miata has one of the most expensive engines, and that along with the suspension contributes the majority cost to the car. There is nothing else that one buys a Miata for.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:oh good grief by vux984 · · Score: 1

      This is nothing new. The 'exhaust sound' was part of the design criteria of the 1st Gen Mazda Miata. Trying to recreate British sports cars (Lotus).

      Yes, everyone knows that the exhaust 'note' is engineered and tuned like everything else. And since the engine is going to make some noise, it should be a pleasant noise.

      What is new is faking it outright. Its one thing to alter the length, diameter, thickness, and shape of an actual exhaust pipe transporting the actual exhaust to get a more pleasing sound. Its something entirely different to play engine-noise-track-1 through the speaker system. Or to add an air pump which just takes fresh air and pumps it through a tube to make extra noise.

      That is new. And nobody really wants that.

    4. Re:oh good grief by megahurts.gr · · Score: 1

      and even before that, all japanese "custom" motorcycles were tweaked to sound like they were broken, because without the tweaks they did not sound quite like harleys.

      --
      This guide is definitive. Reality is frequently inacurate. (from THHGTTG)
    5. Re:oh good grief by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      Some people buy loud motorcycles, or modify the exhaust on a bike because they're under the (somewhat) mistaken belief that it will make them safer. I'm not talking about harley or superbike guys who rev for no reason (not good for engines). These guys draw a lot of attention to themselves but are not the majority of motorcyclists.

  8. As long as I don't have to listen to it... by mspring · · Score: 3, Insightful

    from the outside, I don't care.

  9. HondaKarts? by ChadRiden · · Score: 1

    What do they call those dumb mufflers that make Hondas sound like straining go-karts?

    1. Re:HondaKarts? by OverlordQ · · Score: 2

      The fartcans?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:HondaKarts? by tompaulco · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would like to see proof that straight pipes by themselves do anything for the cars performance. The stock muffler provides a certain amount of back pressure and the engine is specifically tuned to work with this type of pressure. Eliminating this pressure is more likely to reduce rather than improve performance.
      Of course every teenager with $100 thinks that a bolt on part (which fits all models of Honda, Nissan and Toyota!!!1!!ONE!!) is somehow going to improve the performance of the vehicle better than the hundreds of Japanese PhDs that designed the car.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:HondaKarts? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      only if the engine is designed for back pressure. you can get all you need from a sharp transition from head exhaust port to header.

      There is a reason that top fuel dragsters have almost zero back pressure and open short straight pipes.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  10. Those trucks are the best by Russ1642 · · Score: 1, Informative

    The young idiots with too much money buy them. They stomp on the gas at a green light and it sounds like they're drag racing. I gently touch the gas on my car and easily out-accelerated them without making any significant noise. I'll bet they figure it out about two or three days after they buy the trucks that they really have no acceleration or speed to speak of but rather simply noise.

    1. Re:Those trucks are the best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      9/10, it's the middle-aged guys and up buying those trucks because of the sticker price. Ironically, it's the younger "idiots" who are more likely to have a piece of shit with a nice v-8 that makes a ton of noise the good old fashioned way since they can't afford the newer trucks.

    2. Re:Those trucks are the best by Pope+Hagbard · · Score: 1

      The younger kids seem to favor Japanese coupes and hatchbacks with 4-cylinder engines.

    3. Re:Those trucks are the best by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      You won't find many old rice burners in Houston, TX. That's because in Harris (and surrounding) counties, cars that are 1995 and older (pre-OBD2) are subjected to the Accelerated Simulation Mode (ASM) test. Basically, the car is put under load via dynamometer to measure the exhaust as though it was driving under normal conditions on the road. This test has failed countless modded imports and domestics. The only time you see casual drag racing is with either an expensive sports car, or a teenager goofing off with a car that's pure stock. All other mods one older cars are just for show. The Type-R stockers alone provide more HP.

        Accelerated Simulation Mode

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Those trucks are the best by JeffAtl · · Score: 1

      That's not the reason. Millennials tend to prefer living in-town rather than out in the suburbs.

    5. Re:Those trucks are the best by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The young idiots with too much money buy them. They stomp on the gas at a green light and it sounds like they're drag racing. I gently touch the gas on my car and easily out-accelerated them without making any significant noise. I'll bet they figure it out about two or three days after they buy the trucks that they really have no acceleration or speed to speak of but rather simply noise.

      Pickups/utes/trucks_(American) are not performance cars.

      Even in Australia where we produce a 6L V8 ute with a it just cant put the power down because there's no weight over the back wheels. However most pickups have moderate turbo diesel engines and 4x4 drivetrains. Things like a Isuzu D-Max (AKA: Holden/Chevy Colorado) have a 3L turbo diesel that cant out accelerate most 2L hatchbacks. But these cars are workhorses designed for lugging heavy loads.

      This is something I've never understood about the F series trucks, they're bad performance cars, they're terrible off road, they have a shocking carrying and towing capacity and they look like a bag of arses.

      If you're after speed, hot hatches are better than pickups despite being FWD.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  11. Don't see the problem by khallow · · Score: 1

    I see a unmet need for my car sounding like a unlicensed nuclear accelerator. "Switch me on".

    1. Re:Don't see the problem by werepants · · Score: 1

      Real life particle accelerators don't sound like a whole lot... there's the sound of the vacuum pumps and the hum of the cooling systems, but electromagnets themselves are pretty damn quiet for the most part. There unfortunately aren't many cool sci-fi sound effects associated with them.

      However - the one at LBNL makes the pac-man "waka waka" noise when you click the button to open up the beam.

  12. I don't get it by Andrio · · Score: 1

    I must *really* not be a car guy, but I just don't understand the appeal of engine noise. I hear an ICS engine roaring and all I can think is "That ancient technology is really struggling with its task."

    --
    The Internet King? I wonder if he could provide faster nudity.
    1. Re:I don't get it by Art+Challenor · · Score: 1

      Are you using "cool" or "warm" white lightbulbs in your house? Daylight bulbs are readily available, so why to people choose to emulate the yellow incandescent bulb color that was the closest filament bulbs could come to daylight (or maybe they were emulating candles)?

    2. Re: I don't get it by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      Cool blue light gives me a headache, and makes it harder to sleep. So I use warm LED bulbs.

    3. Re:I don't get it by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      You're really not. On the other hand, an electric motor spinning up makes it sound like I'm in a stinky packed tram or trolleybus, so I definitely prefer the ICE sound.

    4. Re:I don't get it by sjames · · Score: 1

      But since the lights are most important in the evening and cool white in the evening can disrupt sleep later, warm makes the most sense. Ideally, the bulbs would start warm first thing in the morning, switch to cool gradually over the next half hour and then transition back to warm in the evening.

    5. Re:I don't get it by Art+Challenor · · Score: 1
      Citation? Ask any of the residents of high lattitude and they'll explain that, in summer (or winter), they have daylight - real daylight - until they go to sleep, at which point they frequently use thick curtains to block the light.

      If your idea had any credibility these lattitutes would be uninhabitable, or at best inhabited by serverely sleep disturbed people.

      Ideally, the bulbs would start warm first thing in the morning, switch to cool gradually over the next half hour and then transition back to warm in the evening.

      Ideally, bulbs would produce exactly the same spectrum as sunlight from the time you flick the switch "on" until you switch it "off". CFLs come close. LEDs have a little more of a challenge and tend towards the blue, unless they are attempting historical reconstruction in which case they tend to be yellow.

    6. Re:I don't get it by sjames · · Score: 1

      And if you do even a bit of googling, you will find that many people in those latitudes have sleep and affective disorders that are treated with a combination of sunglasses and bright lights.

      Have a look at the NASA research. Blue light promotes wakefulness. So, it is desirable during the day. But when you're trying to get ready for bed, wakefulness is not a good thing, so remove the excess blue.

      Likewise, in the morning, a gradual wakup tends to be nicer than being suddenly blasted out of bed, so I would like the blue slowly introduced.

      Note that the pattern I described is very much like the pattern of sunlight before we had indoor lighting other than a fire.

    7. Re:I don't get it by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Citation? Ask any of the residents of high lattitude and they'll explain that, in summer (or winter), they have daylight - real daylight - until they go to sleep, at which point they frequently use thick curtains to block the light.

      Citation.
      Citation.
      Citation.
      Citation.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  13. no thanks by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2

    F that. Give me the quietest car possible. I'd much rather listen to my music or my companions speaking to me than the damn engine!

    --
    "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  14. V8 Rumble by thsths · · Score: 1

    I would be a lot sadder, but for the fact that all that V8 rumble is just the result of an unbalanced engine with a cross plane crankshaft.

    Well designed engines produce a lot less noise, and they have to.

    So if you want to have the sound of a bad engine without the side effects, playback seems like a logical option. And yes, pretty much everybody is messing with the sound.

    1. Re:V8 Rumble by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Noise is loss of efficiency.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:V8 Rumble by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      A proper V8 is quiet and smooth. The one in my old Jaguar XJ Sovereign (2000) has its share of problems but it purrs, and is a joy to drive.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  15. Hardly new by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Years ago I saw a doc on Harley Davidson and a part of the design process was ensuring that the bikes made the "correct" HD noise*. What was interesting for a technical perspective was seeing a bike in an anechoic chamber, which had a robot arm waving around an array of microphones so that they could localize sounds emanating from different parts of the bike.

    While I had no idea that car manufactures were doing this to such an extreme, it's not surprising when you are selling an image rather than just a product.

    * what will be more fun in the future is seeing what the HD sound will be if their electric bike takes off. The reviews I have seen from the test riders have been really positive.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Hardly new by doctor_shim · · Score: 1

      Motorcycle riders seem more conductive to new technologies such as eletric vehicles. So unless the electric HD handles like the current motorcycles they make, then it'll probably do fairly well.

    2. Re:Hardly new by x0 · · Score: 1

      Years ago I saw a doc on Harley Davidson and a part of the design process was ensuring that the bikes made the "correct" HD noise*. What was interesting for a technical perspective was seeing a bike in an anechoic chamber, which had a robot arm waving around an array of microphones so that they could localize sounds emanating from different parts of the bike.

      Years ago, when FI was new to motorcycles, I used to work in a bike shop in Raleigh, NC. One of our customers (with a Ducati 916...) was a developer for the company working on the FI computer and software systems for HD. This would be ~1997/98 or so.

      He said that the first systems demonstrated to HD were rejected because the tuning had been smoothed out to the point that the classic -potato-potato- idle had been tuned out and it no longer sounded HD-ish enough.

      I don't recall if that was a Weber-Marelli or some other system.

      m

      --
      In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
    3. Re:Hardly new by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      > it's not surprising when you are selling an image rather than just a product.

      Well, I'd say that you're selling an image and a product. Or a product and an image. Or something.

      I was at the local dealer during the Livewire tour, (the Livewire being Harley's all electric bike) and like you I wondered how they were going to make the "classic Harley sound". They didn't try, at least in the current version of the product. But it hasn't been released yet, so there's still time.

      Something I've never really understood is the customer compulsion to make it "sound like a Harley". (It *is* a Harley -- it sounds like a Harley *by definition*.) My first two Harleys were used, and the previous owners in each case had replaced the mufflers for something significantly louder. Setting off car alarms as you ride by gets old fast, as does the constant exhaust drone over long distances. On the second bike (a touring model) I talked to the parts guy about it, saying I was looking for a quieter set of mufflers, and he said -- this is a direct quote -- "Oh, you mean the old man mufflers."

      Parenthetically, it's more than just the volume, the pitch makes a lot of difference also. The "aftermarket not legal in California" mufflers that came on my used Ultra Classic had a very high pitched blat that was especially obnoxious. The replacements besides being quieter had a bigger resonating chamber and the noise was pitched significantly lower in frequency. If you must have noise, it helps to rumble, not blat.

      My current bike is my first new Harley (2014 touring model) and from the first time I rode it, I was shocked at how quiet it was. You just don't think of "harley" and "quiet" in the same sentence. It still had a low pitched rumble when you opened the throttle, but not enough to make you want to wear earplugs on long trips. (I guess I'm getting old...)

      So back to the Livewire. I'd be disappointed if Harley saw the necessity to fake the sound of an internal combustion engine digitally. I've seen the Livewire in action (didn't get to ride one only because there was a LONG waiting line) and it makes a low pitched electric-engine growl that still sounds like the bike means business. I suspect that this sound will in time become the new standard.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:Hardly new by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      So unless the electric HD handles like the current motorcycles they make, then it'll probably do fairly well.

      I know there are a few niche companies making electric bikes, but its exciting to see a big name brand like HD testing out demonstrator models rather than just sticking to their 2 big pistons until they die of old age and irrelevancy. While I'm sure the other brands have their own electric bike projects in progress, HD seems to be in the lead right now.

      Checkout Project Livewire. The bike doesn't even look like a current Harley.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    5. Re:Hardly new by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Motorcycle riders seem more conductive to new technologies such as eletric vehicles. So unless the electric HD handles like the current motorcycles they make, then it'll probably do fairly well.

      The Livewire has more in common with Buell than the conventional Harley models. All aluminium frame, monoshock rear, inverted front forks, light, fast, nimble. Of course, this is the prototype model. By release date, maybe Harley will find a way to make them slow and heavy.

      That said, I ride a 2014 Ultra Classic Limited, and at 900+ pounds it feels like a much lighter bike. Harley, *even* Harley, has come a long ways this century. Even the sound system has been dragged kicking and screaming into the nineties -- they now have bluetooth support for phones, although unfortunately not for headsets -- there they use the same DIN connector from the 1950's.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:Hardly new by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      I was at the local dealer during the Livewire tour, (the Livewire being Harley's all electric bike) and like you I wondered how they were going to make the "classic Harley sound". They didn't try, at least in the current version of the product. But it hasn't been released yet, so there's still time.

      What I love about the videos on the Livewire website is that they make it sound a bit like Luke Skywalker's Land speeder. Which to me is cool in its own little way.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    7. Re:Hardly new by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      The Livewire has more in common with Buell than the conventional Harley models.

      As soon as you said Buell I saw the resemblance. It makes me wonder how much of the deign came from a place like Buell and how much was HD in house.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    8. Re:Hardly new by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I was at the local dealer during the Livewire tour, (the Livewire being Harley's all electric bike) and like you I wondered how they were going to make the "classic Harley sound". They didn't try, at least in the current version of the product. But it hasn't been released yet, so there's still time.

      What I love about the videos on the Livewire website is that they make it sound a bit like Luke Skywalker's Land speeder. Which to me is cool in its own little way.

      Funny you should mention that. I noticed that also. They do kind-of sound like that in real life.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    9. Re:Hardly new by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Jeep, as a brand, almost died simply for having non-round headlights.

      Brand association is a powerful thing. Probably an evolutionary thing, actually; if it doesn't taste, sound or smell like what it's supposed to, it's not the same thing, so don't risk it.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  16. Engine noise by Shinobi · · Score: 1

    Personally, I like the quieter cars, both in everyday traffic and in racing. Unlike many others, I enjoy the new turbo V6's in Formula One for example, and it would be interesting to see how much faster the turbo V6's would be than the previous eras if they were allowed to use the aerodynamics regs of those eras(That's what actually slowed down the 2014 F1 cars, the greater restrictions on aero).

    I also enjoy the LMP1 hybrids that are much quieter than their spiritual ancestors, the Group C prototypes.

    For me, within a given engine type, more noise=less impressive, since it shows that it's badly engineered and wasting energy.

  17. Noise is wasted power by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Every bit of energy that goes out in noise is power that is not applied to the wheels.

    1. Re:Noise is wasted power by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      LOL pretty sure the microwatts, or maybe even milliwatts, of sound energy won't be missed. Roll up your windows and you reduce drag.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
  18. More ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can we pipe in the sound of squealing tires every time I turn? I want my ride to work to sound like an '80s movie car chase.

    1. Re:More ideas by TheColorTwelve · · Score: 1

      Can we pipe in the sound of squealing tires every time I turn? I want my ride to work to sound like an '80s movie car chase.

      I always wondered how Bo and Luke squealed their tires on a dirt road. Amazing!

  19. Stick cards in your spokes by Strudelkugel · · Score: 2



    Guess it's the geek in me, but when I think of all the noise being generated I think "Why is this energy going into sound instead of the wheels?" Sure, when I was a kid we all thought it was cool to flip the air filter covers and get glass packs, but now I think it is like sticking cards in your bicycle spokes. This is especially true now that I have had a chance to drive a Tesla: No vibration, or excess sound, just smooth power going right where you want it. Put your foot in it, and you are pushed back in your seat with very little noise. Driving a Tesla, or any decent electric is almost a transcendental experience after driving ICE cars. I read a review by someone who said Rolls Royce has to come out with an electric car because the experience is so much better. Of course electric cars are dangerously quiet for pedestrians, so a noise maker at low speeds is legit. Audi has been busy making interesting concept sounds for their electric vehicles.

    --
    Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    1. Re:Stick cards in your spokes by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm wrong but I though an internal combustion engine was basically an air pump. Getting the air in and out in an efficient manner produced more power. I flipped the air cleaner cover on my 68 327 Impala because it allowed more air to the air cleaner than the one and a quarter inch hole on the side snout. It had nothing to do with the sweet moan from the spread bore carburetor at full throttle.

      One of the best sounding exhaust I ever heard was on a ten wheel flat bed truck with a big block V-8. The owner had simply welded a three ft section of six inch black pipe to each exhaust pipe in place of a traditional muffler.

  20. Connection by tnk1 · · Score: 2

    It helps if you can listen to the engine and really get a good idea how it is running. It was part of troubleshooting before the computers.

    People want to feel in tune with what they are using, and sound helps with that. I'll grant that power doesn't have to be loud, and shouldn't be obnoxious in any case, but I can understand that it gives many people more of a connection to their vehicle.

    I think that people will get over it, but it will be the end of an era.

    1. Re:Connection by CoderFool · · Score: 1

      so now the used car salesman can tune the sound system to sound like another other car and/or mask that clanking sound the engine is making.

  21. Re: This is so stupid. by Fwipp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand this argument, really. It seems to me that on most roads with pedestrians, tire noise is louder than engine noise, and more than sufficient for me to be aware of cars behind me.

  22. The ominous humm.... by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    As Sgt. Schlock says, "I like the soothing sounds I get out of this one.

    Who are we to take them away?

    Of course, by the same argument, do you really have to make it a requirement? Better to make it an option so that those of us that don't want the extra noise don't have to pay you extra to get it.

    Which is the real point of course - stop charging me for things you think I want, without getting my specific permission. This clearly should be an add-on option, not a requirement.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:The ominous humm.... by SkimTony · · Score: 1

      Charging for things I don't want? I'd pay extra to shut off any extra noises my car might make. Then again, I'd pay a lot extra to disable all the extra noises that everyone else's cars make. An engineering project: Can I get the equivalent of a TV-B-Gone, so I can turn off the obnoxious extra noises that the cars around me make?

  23. its nothing new really. by nimbius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to work for a large auto company from Japan, and at the end of the day most of what makes a car or truck is snake oil, but if we quit doing it people stop buying it. We might intentionally introduce inefficiencies in the exhaust to increase that "rally car" sound. Bucket seats and offset head rests trick you into folding your legs and rolling your shoulders in, making the car seem more spacious. Truck tricks include obese front grills despite the engine being efficient enough not to warrant them. And those big bulgy hoods? nowhere near the engine size. To make up for it, and make you feel like our technology is more advanced, we put plastic guards and bezels on top of the engine. It makes the engine look larger for someone who doesnt know what an engine looks like outside of a car or truck, and that sells.

    an we never stopped there. to make up for the gearing required to get that 40mpg, we might program the computer to hold a lower gear longer or shorter to make the car seem "peppier" than it really is. simple things like a vertical indicator on the speedometer can help people associate the product they own with the racecar version they saw in the movie. Making that connection is critical, especially in trucks. Most of our trucks cost upwards of 30 grand, something blue collar could never afford. but if we associate it with blue collar, add splash guards and lift, and run a few ads? instant joe six pack. Actual blue collar construction workers drive, in most cases, an old mid nineties hatchback or 4 door sedan. They have kids to feed.

    So grow up. no, your new 4 cylinder mustang wont roar like a bored out foxbody with glass packs, but you know what? it also gets 36 mpg and doesnt require 93 octane. It doesnt spew benzene and MTBE from the tailpipe because we gave it a catalytic converter. and it wont roll over and kill your kids because we added stability control, and govenment mandated roofing that can hold the weight of our car.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:its nothing new really. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Actual blue collar construction workers drive, in most cases, an old mid nineties hatchback or 4 door sedan.

      But they lust after the F-350.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:its nothing new really. by sinij · · Score: 1

      You don't need a tachometer for standard gearbox, most of the drivers will shift by sound or speed and will never look at the tachometer.
      Had a friend who drove a manual car without tachometer. Ford-something. It had "shift up" dash light that would come up above 4000ish rpms. Was only weird the first time you drove it.

    3. Re:its nothing new really. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I am thankful for the tach in my Armada when I am towing my boat. A tach also gives a visual indication of slippage, flare, and other problems that are increasingly common in today's junky automatic transmissions.

    4. Re:its nothing new really. by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the insight.

      I have long laughed at fake hood scoops (especially aftermarket adhesive attached ones), spinny wheels, Harley's, monster front grills that are more than half fake (physically blocked as part of the molding process), and so much more. Having fake engine sounds piped in just adds icing to the cake.

      Car buyers are strangely aspirational, much more so than for other goods. There are tons of 4x4's that will NEVER be off road running around fair weather states depreciating like mad, and 500 hp Mustang's that will never see over 80 mph for almost any of their life time. People pay a ton either for "just in case", and for "I could if I would".

      There is also a huge market for turning your Civic into some winged contraption (shopping carts as my friend calls them). I see 10 year old cars owned by 20 year olds who are clearly spending half their Target paycheck on throaty exhaust, race style hood clips, and fancy looking rims. Throwing a munch of money at an economy car to get it to look like a race car is the height of putting lip stick on a pig.

    5. Re:its nothing new really. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The F-350 is a truck. Why on earth would anyone lust after a truck? It's only practical purpose is hauling stuff around and the ones that are built today are rarely, if ever, used for hauling anything other than groceries. They eat gas, they fit only two comfortably because the back is taken up by the huge bed which nobody ever puts anything in. They cost about as much as a small 3 bedroom house. Nope, can't see any reason to lust after that.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    6. Re:its nothing new really. by samwichse · · Score: 1

      It's so automatic owners can pretend like they're really driving, not just riding in the car.

    7. Re:its nothing new really. by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      I am thankful for the tach in my Armada when I am towing my boat.

      Is there Irony in a vehicle named after a collection of boats, towing an actual boat?

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    8. Re:its nothing new really. by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      The F-350 is a truck. Why on earth would anyone lust after a truck?

      Oh man, if you have to ask, you'll never know. F-150 Raptor is beautiful too.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:its nothing new really. by radtea · · Score: 1

      To make up for it, and make you feel like our technology is more advanced, we put plastic guards and bezels on top of the engine. It makes the engine look larger for someone who doesnt know what an engine looks like outside of a car or truck, and that sells.

      To people who do know what an engine looks like, it looks like your engine is made out of mostly plastic. I've never been able to get used to this.

      With regard to sounds, once upon a time engine noise used to be a diagnostic, and it kind of bugs me to see it over-ridden by artifice. But in reality, modern vehicles have so much onboard intelligence and are so much better made than cars of decades past that the lost diagnostic capability in the engine noise is almost irrelevant.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    10. Re:its nothing new really. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It means you can use the same instrument cluster for the auto and manual versions of the car, saving costs.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:its nothing new really. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Tachometers are useful diagnostic devices on an automatic, especially a truck under load. So I'm glad I have one, but I hardly ever glance at it unless something seems wrong.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:its nothing new really. by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious. What the heck is "flare" in an automatic?

    13. Re:its nothing new really. by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      Some of the football players around here buy F-350ish looking F-450s or F-550s to haul around groceries.

    14. Re:its nothing new really. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I guess I'll never know, either. I've never understood why there are so many trucks on the road. If you need a truck to do truck-things, I can understand that. But most of the ones I see aren't hauling a damned thing. Those trucks are obnoxious and dangerous to everyone else on the road, I'd love to see most of them gone.

    15. Re:its nothing new really. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would anyone lust after a truck?

      Because they want to do stuff that is outside the purview of soccer moms and little girls.

      They eat gas, they fit only two comfortably

      Four-door trucks which comfortably seat four or five abound. My truck has a crew cab and normally-sized people can be fairly comfortable in the back seat.

      the back is taken up by the huge bed which nobody ever puts anything in.

      When my truck was running (knew better than to buy a Ford, bought it anyway) I rarely used it when I could fit my payload in a smaller vehicle.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:its nothing new really. by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Yeah, you have low empathy. Can't see outside your own little world.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    17. Re:its nothing new really. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      It's when the RPMs shoot up momentarily between shifts because the transmission, for whatever reason, is not completing the shift quickly enough. Usually it can be traced down to either a pressure problem (as in the famous defective-by-design Ford 6F35 transmission) or a computer adaptation misstep (the adaptive algorithms have learned something bad).

    18. Re:its nothing new really. by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      HAHA I never thought of that, but yes I think that is somewhat funny.

      And, it could tow a collection of boats if it wanted to. It's good for something like 9000lbs. :)

    19. Re:its nothing new really. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Just to show how a 4x4 that goes offroad actually looks like: http://toms-worldcruiser.com/e...

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    20. Re:its nothing new really. by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      I drive several modern computer-designed vehicles on a regular basis, including a Dodge Intrepid.

      A tach is absolutely essential simply because the engine and passenger compartment in a modern vehicle is so quiet that it is remarkably easy to red-line it without even noticing.

      Engine life and fuel economy are reliant on a tach. It's really that simple.

      I'd never buy a used car from somebody that doesn't have a tach and doesn't understand this.

    21. Re:its nothing new really. by airdweller · · Score: 1

      I don't think empathy means what you think it means :)

    22. Re:its nothing new really. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Empathy: the ability to understand and share the feelings of another.

      What do you think it means?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    23. Re:its nothing new really. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Usually what they do is put a blank plate where the tach would be. Looks cheap, but that was probably intentional with the hope that you'd upgrade to a model that included it. It was actually pretty common back in the 80's and 90's for the stripper manual version of the car to not have a tach, but the higher end automatic model would include it, which was completely backwards from what you'd expect.

  24. Not a secret by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    TFTitle is stupid: none of this is a secret, every car manufacturer that does this readily admits it to the motoring press.
    I, for one want my car to be as quiet as possible so I'd want the option to disable it. Or I can do what I've done with my current car: replace the stereo.

  25. Fake noise... by Alomex · · Score: 1

    Or you could just design the best, most efficient quite engine. Turns out that the human brain can detect efficiency. So naturally efficient, streamlined shapes and sounds are always aesthetically pleasing.

  26. trademarked sounds by swell · · Score: 2

    Of course we all benefit from patents, copyright & trademarks, right?

    There may be a battle brewing in the sound of cars. ~20 years ago, Harley Davidson tried to trademark the sound of their motorcycle, but that didn't pass. Many others have though and we can expect more as 'sound branding' becomes more widespread.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...
    http://mentalfloss.com/article...
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:trademarked sounds by doconnor · · Score: 2

      Now that the sound of the engine is essentially a creative work, it become copyrightable.

  27. Noise Cancelling, Bad Idea by wb8nbs · · Score: 1

    And sometimes it goes wrong. Like my C-Max
    http://fordcmaxhybridforum.com/topic/3457-strange-long-wooooo-sound-at-steady-speeds-ice-on/

  28. Noise is a safety feature. by BlueKitties · · Score: 1

    Noise helps pedestrians be aware of that two-ton piece of metal and plastic hurdling down the road. If a vehicle is too silent, it increases the risk of pedestrian-vehicle accidents. Noise is good, and we may as well may it something we're familiar with.

    http://www.psmag.com/navigatio...

    --
    "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
    1. Re:Noise is a safety feature. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah but any noise will do. The sound doesn't have to be engine noises. It can be a recording of a baby screaming "VROOM!!!!", or a recorded message like "I need a vehicle with a very loud engine to reassure myself I'm not gay".

    2. Re:Noise is a safety feature. by neminem · · Score: 2

      Clearly it needs to be user-customizeable - I would totally take a silent car that could be programmed to go "vroom! vroom!" excitedly when I went fast in it.

    3. Re:Noise is a safety feature. by Gliscameria · · Score: 1

      I like this. I want my car to sound like tires screeching non-stop.

      --
      X
  29. Re:Noisy cars are good. by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    If you have trouble hearing a Tesla at normal surface road speed, you should get your hearing checked. Below 30, you hear the tires, not the engine of many cars.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  30. Ferrari takes it even a step further... by microTodd · · Score: 1

    Check out this link....scroll down to the section on "Engine Sound".

    http://auto.ferrari.com/en_en/...

    They actually tune it musically.

    --
    "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  31. Re:Foreign it is then! by Yunzil · · Score: 1

    On the contrary. Ford has some of the best engines you can buy and one of the best-looking lineups of any of the carmarkers right now.

  32. Marketing opportunity by dtmos · · Score: 2

    This is a missed marketing opportunity. Car manufacturers need to expose an API so that third-party developers can provide owners with their own sounds -- sounds that respond to the state of the car.

    Want a car that sounds like the Jetsons' flying car when you take off from a light? Now you can. Want your Prius to sound like an F1 Lotus? It's downloadable. Want your econobox to sound like a muscle car? We're here to serve you.

    The good part is, the quieter the car is, the more effective the sounds will be, so those of us that like silence will benefit, too. It's a win-win!

  33. Noise by ledow · · Score: 2, Informative

    If I hear your engine noise, with you trying to rev louder? I think "You're a cock".

    You might even have a nice car, but chances are you have some horrible shit modification to something quite mainstream. Either way, to have to rev it so I can hear? You're a cock.

    If you have to have the sound inside to convince yourself it's fast? You're a cock.

    Cars today are faster and more powerful than the Formula One vehicles of my father's days. You have no need to show off, you cock. Any fucking idiot can get to 120/130 mph in their car these days. Hell, I've seen a Fiat Panda 1000S get to 100mph. My 20-year-old, nothing-special, cheap-shit car did 130mph before I chickened out on an Autobahn.

    There's nothing car-wise to show off about except how much money you've pissed away on it.

    Loud music.
    Loud exhaust sounds.
    Revving the engine.
    Removing badges.
    Stupid fucking lighting systems to make your cheap shit car look like a Christmas ornament at great expense.
    Adding crap like spoilers and twin exhausts to cars that aren't built with them.
    Buying cars with crap like spoilers and twin exhausts and then driving them on a public road (fast or slow!).

    You're a cock.

    And, unfortunately for you, 99.9% of people on the road know it and think exactly the same.

    If you want to quite literally BURN MONEY on shit like that, whether the car is genuinely "fast" or not, on a car that you have to drive behind old grannies, and slow down every mile for a speed camera, and wreck to shit on every speed bump, and still spend as much time sitting in traffic as I do, then feel free.

    But really? If you buy a car BECAUSE it sounds meaty, then you're a cock.

    1. Re:Noise by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

      > If you want to quite literally BURN MONEY on shit like that

      I had a guy explain to me where the $50,000 he put into his Dodge Neon went.

      When you're that stupid, how do you remember to keep breathing?

    2. Re:Noise by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The worst offenders are those that use blue headlight bulbs. It started out as a cheap imitation of incandescence bulbs to looks like HID lights, but then took on a culture of el-cheap-o to make them as Smurf blue as possible. And bright! All very fucking annoying.

      I'll stick with my stock Sylvania bulbs. They last longer, and the human eye sees better in warmer lighting (yellows) conditions anyways; it's more safe for all drivers on the road.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Noise by Whorhay · · Score: 1, Funny

      Honestly with your seeming fascination with cocks it sounds like you have penis envy.

      Seriously though everyone has different priorities and for some that means having a car with visual asthetics that appeals to them. If you are honest with yourself you can look and see what you spend money on in order to match your own tastes. It's even possible that the asthetic you aspire to is having a larger chunk of disposable income because you don't pay extra for otherr asthetics that cost more than the vanilla default options. I find it annoying when other's choices interfere with my own, like the neighbor with the always too loud car stereo blaring. But if it doesn't affect you, like someone putting body kits, rims, and or expensive paint jobs on a $200 car then what's the point in complaining about it? Get over your own penis envy, and embrace your mishapen and or undersized cock, someone else is bound to appreciate it, focus on finding that person and stop worrying about everyone else's.

    4. Re:Noise by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      While objectively, he could have spent the 50k on a better car to start with, he did at least spend it on a hobby that made him happy, and he has something he put personal energy and can take pride in. Much like building your own computer vs. buying an alienware.

  34. Honda CBX exhaust sound engineering by swell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Engineers at Samsung, Apple and other marketing conscious companies are sometimes asked to do unusual tasks. At Honda, planning the introduction of the 6 cylinder CBX motorcycle in the 1970s, sound design became important:

    "From the beginning," Irimajiri explained, "our Six produced a smooth jetlike exhaust sound. But with an ordinary exhaust arrangement, it wasn't that close to a jet. We thought if we worked on it we could come up with a motorcycle sound like no one has ever heard before.

    "So we sent some engineers to the Hyakuri Japanese Air Force base in Chiba prefecture. For ten days they tape-recorded the sound of Phantom jet fighters, and then came back and designed an exhaust system for the CBX that could duplicate that sound. When I heard it for the first time I was amazed; they had captured the Phantom sound perfectly."
    from: http://www.motorcyclespecs.co....

    short Wiki article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...
    hear the sound: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:Honda CBX exhaust sound engineering by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Great. Just what some PTSD-addled Vietnam vet needs to hear.....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Honda CBX exhaust sound engineering by clay_shooter · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the links. I could totally see someone linking the sound to speed or power. They've already been trained for it.

  35. Re: This is so stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They can if I'm riding it and yelling, "GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY ROAD!"

  36. electric car driver here by schlachter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a Leaf Electric car driver, I can say that the lack of engine noise is one of the primary benefits of an electric car.

    I hear things on my commute that I didn't even know existed prior to my Leaf. I hear birds chirping, walk ways for the blind clicking, subtle details in my music, and occasionally, total silence. It's calming. It's also kinda cool to accelerate hard off the line (faster than most gas cars can do) with near silence.

    The car does chirp externally when backing up, but it's not very audible from within the car. Perhaps a similar chirp when driving forward at a slow speed would work.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    1. Re:electric car driver here by Cochonou · · Score: 2

      I think the point of the poster was that the car could accelerate hard with near silence.

    2. Re:electric car driver here by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      The Leaf feels a lot faster than it is because there is no combustion engine to wind up or gears to shift before it accelerates. You put your foot two inches closer to the floor, and before you even have a half inch of pedal travel it has started to move more rapidly - with no audible cues to accompany the change. So it feels much faster than it actually is - even though your WRX will blow its doors off in anything except (maybe) 0-5 mph.

      And the truth is, the sensation of speed matters more than actual measurable speed for 'fun to drive' unless you plan to race your car. Within reason, of course - I bet if the parent post author had your WRX for a week he or she would stop calling a Leaf fast. But I bet the Leaf feels subjectively faster than most vehicles with an 8 second 0-60 and a 16 second quarter mile. I've ridden in one but never driven one.

      Nice car, by the way. I have too many kids to drive anything other than a minivan. :)

    3. Re:electric car driver here by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd stack a Tesla against ANY gas powered car you care to bring out...

      http://youtu.be/BJJvhiFINsY (warning... some profane language)

      Noisy cars are for noisy drivers... I've been arguing this point with my brother for years, every time he buys a louder muffler for his 5.9 Grand Cherokee... it never gets any faster, but it perpetually gets louder and worse gas mileage. I think car owners just need to cop to the fact that they want people to look at them, and what better way to do it than to put a loud ass fart pipe on a WRX?

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    4. Re:electric car driver here by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      It's the auditory equivalent of "rolling coal"

    5. Re:electric car driver here by lgw · · Score: 1

      Except for the "accelerate hard" part, sure. "Not stopping quite as much", maybe.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:electric car driver here by lgw · · Score: 1

      My car certainly out-accelerates a Tesla (well, dunno about that twin-engine job in the video, but at that price point there are faster choices too) - Teslas are freaking heavy.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:electric car driver here by amxcoder · · Score: 1

      There are several trim levels of the Tesla avail, and only the highest performance one has impressive times for the price. Even then, your talking about another class of car at a price of $90K or more. To make the comparison fair, you'd have to stack that up against a Nissan GTR (2.8secs), Porche, or Corvette Stingray, and then you're in a loosing situation again with the Tesla. Heck a Camero ZL1 ($60K) can get better times than the fastest Tesla.

      The 0-60 times of the next highest Tesla is rated at 5.4sec, which puts it on par with a $25K stock WRX still. Sorry to shine reality on the Tesla theory though, they are nice cars, but way, way too expensive for most people, and the performance per dollar just isn't there. To get the performance times you suggest, you're spending near supercar money.

      If you think putting a fart can on a WRX is the best that can be done, you have no clue. I've done an engine swap, turbo upgrade, intake/exhaust upgrades, fuel injectors/pump, running higher boost than stock, and a custom ECU tune... While the whole exhaust system is 3" w/o CATs, the muffler is still the stocker on mine (so no fart can). If I want more power from there, I flip a switch in the cabin and open up a QTec exhaust bypass valve that makes it essentially a straight-pipe 12" after the turbo and is obnoxiously loud (like sets off car-alarms when you drive around). The upgrades I've done easily add well over +100hp to the stock setup. A "fart can" won't get you that.

      The difference between the two, is if someone wants to throw some money at a car (that has a good base), then it can be made to be faster. The Tesla, not so much. Not sure what you could do to that thing to make it much faster other than over-voltage it, your stuck there. So what the Tesla is, is a nice car, that at the $80K trim level can be tied or beaten by a $25K car, and at the $95K trim level, can be beaten by other $95K cars still.

    8. Re:electric car driver here by kimvette · · Score: 2

      > It's also kinda cool to accelerate hard off the line (faster than most gas cars can do)

      BWAHAHAHA!!!!

      Have you checked 0-60 on your Leaf? Most family sedans do better than that with naturally aspirated four-bangers.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    9. Re:electric car driver here by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those drivers remind me of little kids who go 'Wrooom wroom !' in their pedal cars... While adults secretely hope 'he'll grow out of it'...

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    10. Re:electric car driver here by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Funny that you should make that argument.

      I also own a Nissan Z in addition to my Leaf. It's my fun car. A bit hypocritical I suppose but I enjoy them both.

      My Leaf is faster than my Z off the line because it drops 100% torque (about 200 lb-ft) the instant you hit the pedal. Above 20-30mph the Z is much faster...but initial acceleration is less.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    11. Re:electric car driver here by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Such ignorance. I know from your comment you have never driven a Leaf.

      It is very fast off the line. At least as fast as my Nissan Z. Slower than a family car? BWAHAHAHA.

      0-60 mph times have NOTHING to do with how fast a car is off the line.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    12. Re:electric car driver here by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      I can tell you're really proud of what you've got there... good for you. But you completely missed my point. Speed is not the only comparison to be made here... so when I say I'd stack a Tesla up against any car you care to bring out... I mean stack, not race. Make a fair comparison, and you must realize you've been squarely beaten. We're talking about powerful, and silent here, but you go so far as to state that when you straight pipe your car, that you can set off car alarms... as if that somehow disproves my fart-can statement? You've given me nothing but evidence that I'm right. Your had to make your car loud and obnoxious to gain 100hp, while making it illegal in the process. So congratulations on that. It doesn't make your car better.

      Here is the reality that faces you, and of which you are terrified: The reason a Tesla costs $90k is because it is new, it is novel, and it is extremely high quality. You can take all of Tesla's technology, and pack it into a 2 seater that weighs 1/3 less. You can skip all the leather and build a cheap plastic car similar in trim and quality to your beloved WRX. In a few years when the Gigafactory is up and running, and batteries get less expensive, it will be possible to build the every-man consumer grade sports car that will absolutely trounce anything that exists today, and will do it for $30k.

      I predict that an electric car will set a world record on Pikes Peak in the next 10 years, and that record will never be re-taken by a gas powered vehicle.

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    13. Re:electric car driver here by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      I don't always fanboi, but when I do, I prefer to do it to a product/company that actually deserves my fanboi squeals of delight. A Nissan GT-R doesn't seat 4. A Nissan GT-R doesn't run silent. And a Nissan GT-R doesn't deserve my fanboidom.

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  37. Re:Noisy cars are good. by ledow · · Score: 2

    If you WEREN'T FUCKING LOOKING as you crossed the road, it's your own fault.

    In many countries, quite literally.

    Your ears are no good for distance detection, nor at detecting noise from background without "obscuring" all noise (hence if you are in a loud place for a while, it doesn't SEEM loud because your ears are "dialling down" every volume, including that of the car beside you - that's why you have that "Shit, it was loud in there, hear how quiet it is now I'm out of that place!" moment). Your ears are easily deceived. Echoes can easily distort the origins of sounds.

    If you're relying on your ears, in any way shape or form, to cross the road, you're going to get run over. That's why blind people need to have dogs who can hear, but deaf people can cross a road just fine on their own.

    Look towards the traffic on your side of the road, look the other way, look BACK to the traffic on your side (the FIRST side that you are walking into and will kill you) as you step out, as you approach half-way and are about to cross over into that traffic's territory, check the other side again.

    Sounds DO NOT play a part.

    Mandating things like compulsory side-lights (like many European countries have 24/7 for all vehicles, no matter the weather conditions) does infinitely more for safety than fake noises on silent motors.

    Fucking green-cross-code people (UK people, at least). The kind of thing you learned when you were five. Look, look the other way, look again, step out. Listening is merely a backup device in case some fucking nutter comes steaming down the road not seeing you and you need to dive out of the way. But, guess what, you'll turn your head to look at him first.

  38. But what will Jeremy Clarkson have to review? by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

    Jeremy, on Top Gear, is so fond of the "symphony of power" and comparisons to fighter planes. The idea that external sound represents wasted power is so . . . . abstract.

  39. Re: This is so stupid. by demonlapin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Tires are almost silent on paved roads. Have someone put their car in neutral and turn the engine off as they roll down a hill toward you.

  40. The Movie: The Dilemma by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    This is the plot gimmick used in the horrible movie "The Dilemma" starring Vince Vaughn and his fake sound makers to make Dodge electric car engines sound "less gay".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:The Movie: The Dilemma by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      This is the plot gimmick used in the horrible movie "The Dilemma" starring Vince Vaughn and his fake sound makers to make Dodge electric car engines sound "less gay".

      Which, given that there has been moves to add noise to electric vehicles, is art imitating life.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  41. low speed is the problem by schlachter · · Score: 5, Informative

    I drive an electric car. At low speeds, say under 20mph, people NEVER hear or see my car coming. These are also the speeds I'm typically driving at when pedestrians are around. People always meander in front of my car or jump in surprise when the turn and see me cruising past them a few feet to the side of them. I sometimes honk. I sometimes pause extra long. There is definitely a need to account for it.

    At higher speeds, sure there's tire noise.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    1. Re:low speed is the problem by bgarcia · · Score: 1

      I drive a Nissan Leaf. It has an exterior speaker that generates a noise when the car is travelling at less than 20mph (such as in a parking lot).

      It doesn't matter. People just simply aren't paying attention, whether or not the car makes noise. They're too busy staring at their iphones.

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    2. Re:low speed is the problem by schlachter · · Score: 1

      My 2015 Nissan Leaf does not have that. I think that was something only the first gen cars came with.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  42. Playing cards in the bicycle spokes by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    All kids under 10 love to have a playing card clipped into their bicycle spokes. It just sounds so bad ass.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Playing cards in the bicycle spokes by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      "One man's music is another man's noise."

      Ironically it applies to everything that is not too common:
      i.e. Harley Davidson motorcycles, "loud pipes save lives", Heavy Metal, etc.

  43. Re:Foreign it is then! by Whorhay · · Score: 1

    As a comparative test of gigantic auto makers I suppose you could be right. But honestly most of their vehicles look very ugly to my eyes, and that's including the chubby mustangs. The one exception that I can think of form Ford would be the GT40. Now Tesla makes a good looking car, the S is close to what I imagined cars of the future would look like as a kid. However Tesla still has plenty of time to tank that reputation as they've only got a couple models so far.

  44. Re:Foreign it is then! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    What's the point of an engine that runs correctly in a car that looks good if everything else is shit?

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  45. Unbelievable fakery! by Drunkulus · · Score: 1

    At least the music industry still has some integrity.

  46. Marching Morons by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Fake wind and engine noise in so called "rocket cars" was a plot point in this short story IIRC.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:Marching Morons by dzelenka · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I was sure I had read this at some time and I just couldn't remember the title.

      As I remember, the point was that people had become so stupid that fake engine noise and wind coming from the dashboard was all that was necessary to give the morons the sensation of speed and power. I guess we're just a fake breeze away from being those morons.

      Written by Cyril M. Kornbluth, originally published in Galaxy in April 1951.

      --
      Bah!
    2. Re:Marching Morons by gatkinso · · Score: 1

      Also, the speedometers would read "150" when you were really going like 40 IIRC.

      The moronic quote "I'll buy that for a quarter!" which appeared in Robocop in the form "I'll buy that for a dollar!"

      Definitely a seminal work of Science Fiction. Sadly it is also turning out to be a harbinger.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    3. Re:Marching Morons by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      A harbinger in other ways, too. Much of the story centers on a group of technocrats and scientists struggling to keep society running in the face of the incompetence and stupidity in the general public. I'm sure a lot of climate scientists are feeling that vibe right now.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    4. Re:Marching Morons by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Y'all beat me to the post. Well, if anyone wants to know more, there's a description (with plot spoiler) here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...

  47. Cars, phsaw by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    > Without them, today's more fuel-efficient engines would sound far quieter

    Lets talk jets.

    I remember a CF-101 Voodoo doing it's first pass over Borden at about 200 feet in full burner. Car alarms went off, children screaming, it was amazing.

    Then came the CF-18. Soo boring. Even the F-22's a wimp in comparison.

    Maybe we should add fake noise at air shows?

  48. So I can't sleep because engineers are jerks? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Seriously?

    I live up the block from a whole slew of bars in Fremont in Seattle and you're telling me the noise that wakes me up is because some idiot engineers thought it would be "cool" to add it in?

    Give me their names and addresses so I can hunt them down ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:So I can't sleep because engineers are jerks? by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      I'd bet what you hear are aftermarket exhausts. People love to install them due to marketing claims of gaining 10+ horsepower and they aren't required to meet government noise regulations ("off-road use only").

    2. Re:So I can't sleep because engineers are jerks? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Note to self: build noise-seeking self-immolating drones. ... ...

      Profit!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  49. Engine noise is a thing of the past. by adric22 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This sort of reminds me of when Motorola was putting fake antennas on their cellular phones (with the real antenna inside) because they thought people wouldn't buy the phone if it didn't have a visible antenna. But eventually, society learned that an visible antenna was not necessary and we moved on. I suspect in another 20 years most cars will be a lot more quiet as a result of hybrid and electric drivetrains. I've been driving an EV now for 3 years and now that I've grown accustomed to the silence, hearing any engine noise at all sounds so yesterday, so obsolete.

  50. I want silent vehicles by sjbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is nothing ridiculous about mandating some amount of noise in the meantime.

    I completely disagree. If you mandate noise you will never get silence. Plus once you get enough cars close together you almost can't distinguish them anyway because it basically becomes white noise. Just because people have become accustomed to a certain amount of noise is not a credible argument for continuing to emit noise pollution needlessly. And no, I am not at all concerned about blind or inattentive pedestrians crossing the road in front of me. It's MY responsibility as a driver to drive carefully and watch out for possible road hazards. It is also their responsibility to watch out when crossing the road. Hell, people get hit by trains while walking and they make a huge racket and are 100% avoidable by staying off the tracks.

    1. Re:I want silent vehicles by Githaron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. It makes more sense to give all blind people car detectors than to make all cars noisy.

    2. Re:I want silent vehicles by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      My vehicle is not entirely silent but close enough that I have to look at the rpms to tell if the car started sometimes. Listening to the actual engine noise even if there isn't much of one can be helpful it lets you know when there is a problem. Fake engine noises would drowned out the actual engine noise when a problem did occur.

    3. Re:I want silent vehicles by ArcadeMan · · Score: 2

      Bonus points if the car detector makes the same beeping noises as the radar tracker in the movie Aliens.

    4. Re:I want silent vehicles by Cochonou · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You just have to mandate a decreasing amount of noise over the years, so that you will eventually get silence, and so that people will have enough time to get used to silent cars. As you do for almost every transition.

    5. Re:I want silent vehicles by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you mandate noise you will never get silence.

      Why should silence be a goal? Being able to hear an approaching vehicle is not just a safety issue for blind people, it is an issue for anyone who is trying to cross a road and can't see approaching cars.

      Plus once you get enough cars close together you almost can't distinguish them anyway

      It isn't important to distinguish between multiple oncoming cars. What's important is that "there's a car coming", not that "the first car in the line is a Prius, the second one is a Volvo, the third is ...".

      Just because people have become accustomed to a certain amount of noise is not a credible argument for continuing to emit noise pollution needlessly.

      One person's "pollution" is another persons "ambient sounds". The sound of a properly muffled car engine is hardly "pollution". You're confusing the concept "I don't like hearing..." with "it is pollution".

      It's MY responsibility as a driver to drive carefully and watch out for possible road hazards.

      And it is the responsibility of the person trying to cross the street not to step out in front of an oncoming car. Even were your job done perfectly, they'd still have to do theirs because the laws of physics say that I can step out in front of you much faster than you can stop.

      It is also their responsibility to watch out when crossing the road.

      Ahhh, ok. Blind people should just sit quietly at home listening to the radio and not dare wander about the streets where they might become a hindrance to you. They can't "watch" anything, so they shouldn't be anywhere that "watching" is required.

      Should we also relegate paraplegics to the dust bin because they cannot obey the "walk" signal at a signalled crossing? They can only manage the "don't walk". And how dare they try using cross-walks in the first place. They aren't called cross-rolls, you know.

    6. Re:I want silent vehicles by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I'm the opposite, I LOVE the sound or a nicely tuned powerful engine. Revving it is fun, hitting the gas and laying some rubber from time to time is fun.

      I guess you like some others consider a car as *nothing* more than transportation to get from A to B. I think that's sad. I've never owned anything but 2x seat sports cars with the exception of a great 1986 911 Turbo which "technically" had 4 seats but the rear ones wouldn't even hold groceries, so doesn't really count.

      The cars I buy and drive, are basically a fun adventure to me every time I sit in it and turn the key on. Right now, I'm trying to get a good, rebuilt mid 70's or so big block engine...something hopefully before catalytic converters and mostly just mechanical and non-computerized. Something with brute force and power.

      Now THAT is fun....and hell, I can afford the gas.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:I want silent vehicles by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      The noise it needs to make is "wooo wooo" http://youtu.be/zUXow3d3-b0

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    8. Re:I want silent vehicles by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Which means you'll have variable sound levels for 15-30 years as old cars aren't upgraded to the less noisy sound requirements. Thanks, but no thanks.

    9. Re:I want silent vehicles by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      If you mandate noise you will never get silence.

      Good. That's an admirable goal. The greater the destructive potential of a vehicle, the more evident it should be. Making cars only evident in the visual spectrum is a poor choice, even at the cost of your evident need to sleep, rest, or otherwise concentrate while near a roadway.

      Plus once you get enough cars close together you almost can't distinguish them anyway because it basically becomes white noise.

      Not so. There's a reason why bells are more or less constantly rung in China on bicycles; it's not unlike echolocation. Riders advertise their presence for safety purposes.

      Just because people have become accustomed to a certain amount of noise is not a credible argument for continuing to emit noise pollution needlessly.

      Just because [reason that is not the reason for the argument]... [stuff]. It's not a question about what we are accustomed to. We shouldn't continue to have seat-belts in cars because we're accustomed to them. We should continue to have them because they're a bloody safety feature.

      And no, I am not at all concerned about blind or inattentive pedestrians crossing the road in front of me. It's MY responsibility as a driver to drive carefully and watch out for possible road hazards. It is also their responsibility to watch out when crossing the road.

      Excellent, let's reduce the bidirectional safety measures because you want to hear your whale-song tranquility CD better. There are situations - real situations - where line-of-sight is blocked but usefully sound is not. You can currently hear cars around a corner, or behind an obstruction, before you step out, peddle out, or potentially make a lane change. Yes, it is everyone's responsibility to "be safe", but audible motor vehicles is a tool that aids in that endeavor.

      Hell, people get hit by trains while walking and they make a huge racket and are 100% avoidable by staying off the tracks.

      People are occasionally killed in airplane crashes, which are very, very loud, and completely avoidable by walking everywhere instead of flying.

      There is simply no good argument for allowing the removal of a useful side-effect, other than your personal tastes. Now, I admit there's a big difference between say, a Harley, or... um... my big-ass V8... and a typical car, in that there is such a thing as simply obnoxious. But silent cars? Bad idea.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    10. Re:I want silent vehicles by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Being able to hear an approaching vehicle is not just a safety issue for blind people, it is an issue for anyone who is trying to cross a road and can't see approaching cars.

      When crossing the road, can you hear the fake engine noise being played to the driver of a Mustang?

      No.

      Now fuck off and stop mandating that we all have to put up with unnecessary noise because you don't know how to fucking cross a road safely.

    11. Re:I want silent vehicles by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Tires rolling on pavement make noise. There's no reason to add to it.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    12. Re:I want silent vehicles by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I agree. It makes more sense to give all blind people car detectors than to make all cars noisy.

      I don't know. In my state, there is a special law for pedestrians who are in a wheelchair or blind being led by a guide dog or carrying a metallic or white walking stick.

      Drivers are required to ensure their safety, and they are guaranteed right of way at all times, even though not all pedestrians get that priority, and if you hit a blind person crossing, you are essentially going to jail.

    13. Re:I want silent vehicles by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Why should silence be a goal?

      Billions of people actually have to live on those streets you drive down, and the noise affects their lives and traps them inside and causes an obesity epidemic.

      Both blind and sighted people can use crosswalks. And if car engines were silent, you'd start to be able to hear the sound of the tires in the same way you can hear human footsteps when there aren't a bunch of noisy cars around. There is danger during the period when there are enough noisy cars to drown out the quiet ones and few enough quiet ones that the public doesn't expect them, but silence should certainly be the long term goal.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    14. Re:I want silent vehicles by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Also I bike a lot and I can't believe the number of people who cross the road without even a glance. The sooner those people are out of the gene pool thanks to electric cars, the better.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    15. Re:I want silent vehicles by FreedomFirstThenPeac · · Score: 1

      How about a Google-enhancement to human driven cars that beeps, whistles or otherwise sound signals a human or large animal only when they are near the car or in the path thereof?

      --
      "There is no god but allah" - well, they got it half right.
    16. Re:I want silent vehicles by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Tires rolling on pavement make noise. There's no reason to add to it.

      Not very much noise, and if the car is already slowing to stop at an intersection or to make a turn, that tire noise is very low. Below the other noises on the street. I've been on the streets, both as a pedestrian and a bicyclist, and had an electric car sneak up on me from behind before, and I know it isn't the safest way to run things.

      There is no reason to make a vehicle that can kill someone who mistakenly steps in front of it as quiet as possible. You might notice that trucks (even those with diesel engines that make considerable noise) are usually equipped with backup alarms to create noise to alert people in the area that he's backing up.

      The demand for silence on the streets is ridiculous, and the claim that the next guy makes about billions of people living on the streets needing absolute silence even more so.

    17. Re:I want silent vehicles by peon_a-z,A-Z,0-9$_+! · · Score: 1

      everything in the above post

      Holy Hyperbole, Batman!

    18. Re:I want silent vehicles by FoxMcElroy · · Score: 1

      This conversation clearly wasn't talking about the Mustang noise but noise added to nearly silent electric vehicles. These are still quieter than conventional combustion engines are now. It would reduce the number of people bludgeoned and smeared on the pavement so I'm sure your fail ears can manage.

  51. Re:This has been going on for years by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    While your point is valid at least what you were hearing on both cases was sound produced by the engine. Hell back in the 50's motorheads were putting on glasspack mufflers.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  52. Quiet cars and proportion of accidents by sjbe · · Score: 1

    That mandated noise IS entirely a safety issue

    It is a perceived safety issue and I don't buy the arguments in favor of mandating noise pollution. If it really were a problem we should expect to see cars that are quieter than average involved in proportionally more collisions that cars that are more noisy. I've not seen one speck of evidence that quiet cars get in more accidents due to their sound levels. It is to my mind a completely nonsensical argument with no evidence to support it.

    1. Re:Quiet cars and proportion of accidents by MadKeithV · · Score: 3, Informative

      That mandated noise IS entirely a safety issue

      It is a perceived safety issue and I don't buy the arguments in favor of mandating noise pollution. If it really were a problem we should expect to see cars that are quieter than average involved in proportionally more collisions that cars that are more noisy. I've not seen one speck of evidence that quiet cars get in more accidents due to their sound levels. It is to my mind a completely nonsensical argument with no evidence to support it.

      Studies have been done and have confirmed that quiet cars get in more accidents at lower speeds due to their sound levels.

    2. Re:Quiet cars and proportion of accidents by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      If it really were a problem we should expect to see cars that are quieter than average involved in proportionally more collisions that cars that are more noisy. [But] I've not seen one speck of evidence that quiet cars get in more accidents due to their sound levels.

      Might have something to do with the type of person who drives these cars. A kid who removes the baffles in his silencer (US "muffler"?) is probably the type who is more likely to have accidents than the type of driver attracted to a smooth, quiet car. An effect that might well outweigh the "safety" of a louder approach noise.

    3. Re:Quiet cars and proportion of accidents by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't we just accept that? The driver won't sneak up on anybody, assuming they are not endangering everyone.
      There is already laws, that indirectly force people to wear visible clothing as fall comes along with the extreme darkness. To be aware of your surrounding, I.E: Not throwing yourself in front of cars/wagons/trains.

  53. Re:Noisy cars are good. by jcdr · · Score: 2

    In Switzerland, the Law on Road Traffic sets pedestrians priority on vehicles. So, vehicles have to be very careful in any situations involving pedestrians, and the noise of the vehicles play a less important role to the safety. The effect of the rule has proved to be a success to lower the number of accidents, even if a few fanatic periodically attack it. The fact is that pedestrians includes vulnerable groups of peoples like children and seniors that can't be required to have a license to cross roads.

  54. Re:Foreign it is then! by Yunzil · · Score: 1

    Er, like what?

  55. Let the consumer choose by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    As long as it's clear to the buyer what's going on, who cares?

    People spend good $ on stupid crap all the time.
    Is an automobile owner paying for "fake engine sound" any sillier than someone spending $15 a month to kill pretend monsters to get pretend gear to better kill pretend monsters?

    Personally, I admire the efficiency of an engine that can generate 200+ horsepower that you can barely hear from 10' away. That's astonishing, if you think about it. But I get it, some people want the sound. Seems sorta silly to me, but that's just me.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Let the consumer choose by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      EDIT to the above (love Slashdot's posting system):

      What *needs* to happen is that someone needs to show up to a gearhead rally with a Prius wired with that SAME digital file and BETTER speakers, meaning that right next to the "roaring Mustang" is an even-louder Prius, sounding otherwise identical. LOL.

      --
      -Styopa
    2. Re:Let the consumer choose by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      You do know that in the American English vernacular, a 'rally' can just be a gathering, it doesn't solely mean a specific type of race, yes?

      --
      -Styopa
    3. Re:Let the consumer choose by adolf · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he is colour-blind, or suffering from the Faraday effects of his aluminium hat.

  56. It's all about me. by westlake · · Score: 1

    People will just have to adapt to the fact that you can't trust your hearing to know if a car is coming or not anymore.

    No they don't, actually.

    Situational awareness matters at all ages, audio and visual clues are helpful --- and if people decide they want to keep them in place, it's the geek who will have to make the adjustment, not the other way around.

    It was the geek's sense of entitlement, his in-your-face attitude, that killed Google Glass. The very definition of what it means to be Glasshole,

    1. Re:It's all about me. by reikae · · Score: 2

      How and why did you suddenly turn this into Geeks vs "Normals"? The "geek" is included in people and has just as much (or little) say as anyone else. Besides that, I doubt it's only geeks who would enjoy less traffic noise.

    2. Re:It's all about me. by Calydor · · Score: 1

      If visual clues are so important, why aren't cars mandated to all be in the most visible colors possible, rather than lots of silver or black cars that vanish against the background?

      If engine noise gets mandated, so help me I will lobby to have it mandated that ALL cars be neon orange with large green dots.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  57. Re:My dealer was cool enough to warn me by ah.clem · · Score: 1

    This article is pretty old news. The woman leased a...

    Did you then take her home and have "the sex"?

    --
    "Life is not magic." Dr. Ron Weiss - "If we don't play God, who will?" Dr. James Watson
  58. Perfect marketing opportunity! by GrandCow · · Score: 2

    Domino's is already ahead of the game here. If you're faking engine noise, might as well get creative with it.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Perfect marketing opportunity! by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      Domino's is already ahead of the game here. If you're faking engine noise, might as well get creative with it.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Reminds me of Norio Wakamotorcycle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  59. Silent by default by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Quiet (or as quiet as possible) is one aesthetic that may be desirable. For other people (or perhaps cars), a good rumble (as long as it not excessively load and obnoxious) is equally a desirable aesthetic. It's not so different, as you note, than choice of paint job.

    The problem is that silent is never obnoxious but the "good rumble" often is. I can comprehend that some people enjoy a loud car (I do not) but I think the default should be silence. Make them quiet and people who make them loud should have to pay extra for the noise pollution they create.

    1. Re:Silent by default by monkeyzoo · · Score: 1

      I agree and am against LOUD. I am not talking about LOUD. I am talking about subjectively *pleasant* sound. They are different. They may be present together, but it is not required. Do not misconstrue my words to support LOUD. I explicitly stated against that!

  60. Tires are nowhere near silent by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tires are almost silent on paved roads

    The hell they are. Tire noise accounts for 70-90% of overall noise energy when travelling over 50mph.

    Have someone put their car in neutral and turn the engine off as they roll down a hill toward you.

    I will notice the car getting louder and louder as its speed increases. What's your point?

    1. Re:Tires are nowhere near silent by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      There aren't typically pedestrians crossing 50 mph roads, and even if there are, those roads are usually straight enough so that they have a good line-of-sight. 20 or 30 mph is where you have cars, peds, and bikes intermingling.

    2. Re:Tires are nowhere near silent by adolf · · Score: 1

      I recently moved from a house on a one-way street that adjoined a very busy intersection, to a different house a couple of blocks away on the same one-way street.

      Before, it was maddening: There was a constant roar of revving engines, worse in the summer with barely-mobile Harley riders gunning the engine just to keep it running, but also year-round coverage from loud ricers, heavy trucks, and straight-piped diesel pickups.

      Now that I'm a couple of blocks away from that intersection, and not particularly near a stop sign or a traffic light, it's much, much quieter...not so much because there is less traffic (there is plenty), but because that traffic is not actively accelerating.

      So, you're right. But you're also wrong.

      The noise I hear, now, is almost always just tire noise. The speed limit is 25MPH (which people tend to think of as 30MPH in this locality) and folks tend to be actively decelerating for the railroad crossing just past my house, and yet I can plainly hear the cars approaching from hundreds of feet away.

      Even a Tesla, of which there is one in the neighborhood that I see out and about semi-regularly.

      So yes, drivetrain noise can be significant, but even in residential areas where people aren't accelerating, tire noise alone can be very substantial...and certainly substantial enough for a middle-aged person of average or below-average hearing to hear what's coming.

      Parking lots? I've been damn near run down by a distracted, low-speed Prius driver before. I might be OK with some form of artificial noise -outside- the vehicle, as I understand (but have not witnessed) is done with the Nissan Leaf.

      (I've also lived next to a busy Interstate, which was also very noisy place dominated by rubber tires on asphalt, and also on a goes-nowhere country road whereupon most drivers had a destination on that road and that was also largely tire noise. I realize these extra data points add nothing to this particular discussion of residential speeds, but perhaps lends some credence to my perceptive experience.)

  61. But that's the whole point !! by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    My VW GTI (aka Audi A3) has a "sound box" which makes a delightful little growl when you step on the gas. Coupled with a muffler that puts out a "pummp pummp" sound - it is all cool. VW didn't hide it - it is advertised albeit small print feature. Making my little 0-60 runs and hearing the deep tone change with each tap of the paddle-shifter, it just gives a little twinge of excitement in the lower region of the anatomy.

    What is driving a car? I say the experience and exhilaration. Sure some of these features are like spinning wheel-caps - but they add to the fun. Its the feeling.

    The performance geeks remove this box ( Y-delete) because it affects throttle response. But for us old people who bomb through the mountain pass with the windows open and Red Barchetta playing from the stereo - I'm after the surreal.

    Just as long as it doesn't sound fake :-P

  62. STUPID CAR MAKERS by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    I always associated loud engine noise as straining, and pushing an engine hard. It makes me feel like the vehicle is under-powered. A powerful engine should move it's vehicle with seemingly minimal effort.

    1D10T5 ERROR

  63. BMW by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    I believe BMW was actually the first to pump completely fake engine nosies (electronically created not just amplified) through the stereo quite a while back, and I think nearly all their models do that now. Its one of the bigger reasons I wouldn't ever buy a BMW, and apparently now you can add Ford to that list.

    That said, where do you stop in being critical? Nearly all sports car makers invest a LOT of money on tuning exahusts to get the sound they want, even possibly at the cost of some performance. I guess at least if its coming out the exhuast its orignally an actual engine noise, and that people outside the car can hear too.

  64. Now, read this short story from 1951 by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    It wasn't meant to be frightening, it just turned out that way.

    http://mysite.du.edu/~treddell...

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  65. in 10 years, that will not be an issue by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Cars already have sensors and safety packages. These are being improved all the time. In 10 years, the only way to run over someone is with your bike.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  66. Nothing new by zmooc · · Score: 1

    I have that too. The radio in my 1995 Subaru sounds like a jet engine in tune with the engine revs. It's awesome.

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  67. What? by kaendesmut · · Score: 1

    This is the most stupid feature that i ever heard of. Seriously, I've always thought that the car noises were unavoidable, but this gives me the impression that the car manufacturers see us like a Jersey Shore morons.

  68. Really old news by Knuckles · · Score: 1
    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  69. Obligatory: 12 Second Mini Van by DrJimbo · · Score: 1

    link

    I reached my (1st) goal of getting into the 14's in the quarter mile, last year. I feel that any car running in the 14 seconds is faster than most cars on the road, but this speed stuff is like a drug. You always think of some little thing to make it a little faster. If a 14 second mini van will beat most of the cars on the road, a 12 second Mini Van mini van will beat almost all the cars on the road!

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
  70. It's a new part of the industry by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2

    If you look at this demo of the QNX Kia Soul at CES 2014 starting at about 1:20 they demonstrate the acoustic shaping properties of QNX Car 2.0. From dampening exterior noise to engine sound "enhancement". They demo the Soul revving but sounding like a Dodge Challenger.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  71. So this is the future? by gukin · · Score: 1

    People doing stuff like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  72. Hmmmm... by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

    So, I guess you could say that Ford is the Milli Vanilli of cars?

    --
    They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
  73. Re: This is so stupid. by slapys · · Score: 2

    Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads.

  74. Real Reason: Industry's fear of hybrid and electri by rsborg · · Score: 1

    Electrics and hybrids simply require less service. They die less often, they require less parts and can last longer between servicing. All this means the supply and service chain for automotive industry will take a big hit, and the non-replacement problem will impact the auto manufacturers to lose sales as well.

    Solution (from their point of view): Remove one of the biggest selling points of electric motors: zero noise. Force the limitations (i.e., noisy) of gas-only cars onto the nascent electric industry. Create a hubbub about it and make it an issue even if the opposite may be true (people generally like quieter cars).

    The Auto industry isn't going to go quietly like the HDD industry did when SSDs appeared (like SSDs, electric-motor vehicles are quieter, faster and have lower failure rates) - they plan on fighting tooth and nail to keep their profits up even if it takes buying legislation.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  75. Purrrrr, Baby, Pur by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I always wanted a Yugo that sounds like it has a V10

  76. Two types of "faking" it by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are two types of faking it that are currently used, as outlined in the summary.

    Noise pipes, that take engine noise through a hollow pipe into the interior of the car are quite different to playing a synthetic soundtrack through the car's speakers. Modern cars have significantly more noise insulation than older vehicles, so cutting through some of this insulation so that the real engine noise can reach the cabin isn't necessarily cheating. You need an engine that sounds good to begin with here and you're hearing the actual sounds that the engine is making.

    Having an engine that makes unpleasant sounds, or is too quiet, and supplementing this with a soundtrack played through the car's speakers - well, it may sound really good inside the car, but outside the car, you're not going to be hearing much of note...

  77. don't fake it... by confused+one · · Score: 1

    If you want engine noise, don't fake it. Refurbish a classic car.

  78. Intentionally annoying? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    So the auto manufacturers have been intentionally making their cars annoying to the people who don't own those cars? Screw them. I want cars and trucks to be as close to silent as possible. Cars already create far too much noise pollution. Perhaps auto manufacturers to just pipe the sounds inside the car for those owners who desire that, while leaving the rest of us in a more peaceful world?

  79. Aural feedback by jbwolfe · · Score: 1
    I don't see at as such a "dirty little secret". I see it more as a drivers tool- much like a dead pedal or an electronically adjustable differential. Perhaps it would be better to view it at as a means to inform the driver through aural feedback of engine speed, load and shift points. The fact that they tweak it to make it sound "cool" is just a bonus.

    Cars have become both quieter and more powerful, as well as idiot proof- I kind of prefer the days where one had to work at it to drive well.

    --
    Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac?
  80. off by Tom · · Score: 1

    As long as it has an "off" switch, they can do what they want.

    I actually like my cars to be quiet, one of the reasons I like driving BMWs and am very interested in electric cars.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  81. There was a 70's short story about this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    See "Speed of the Cheetah, Roar of the Lion" (fully excerpted on Google Books). I'm not sure who the author is. I originally heard it on read on the radio.

  82. Fake engine noises are a fad by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    They will be with us for a while, but then they will go away as we get used to the sound of smaller engines. Some of the small engines actually sound really great, and once we get used to that then people will stop complaining that they don't sound like a V8.

    Some automakers are including noise pipes that run through the firewall and carry engine noise into the cabin, that way you can actually hear your little four banger.

    Personally, I don't want to hear anything that isn't there. Fake engine noises are for fake cars for fake people.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  83. Re:Noisy cars are good. by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Because people never get hit by cars in parking lots, or by drivers who are not paying attention.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  84. Re:Foreign it is then! by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    So much for your anti American rant. From the article:

    Volkswagen uses what’s called a “Soundaktor,” a special speaker that looks like a hockey puck and plays sound files in cars such as the GTI and Beetle Turbo. Lexus worked with sound technicians at Yamaha to more loudly amplify the noise of its LFA supercar toward the driver seat.

    Some, including Porsche with its “sound symposer,” have used noise-boosting tubes to crank up the engine sound inside the cabin. Others have gone further into digital territory: BMW plays a recording of its motors through the car stereos, a sample of which changes depending on the engine’s load and power.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  85. Having your cake and eating it too by kicks-ass · · Score: 1

    Car companies have worked for years to deaden car interiors to block out engine and road noise, This is mostly because for a lot of people, engine noise is just noise, and they would rather not hear it. The amount of deadening applied under the hood, on the firewall, on the floor, on body panels, is stagerring, and then tere are folks who fit even more deadening (I'm not talking the audiophile type - just people who want a quiet car) like rubber undercoatings to reduce road noise Then they realize that this has turned off another demographic that likes to hear this noise. They decide that playing the sound back through speakers (there have been mechanical approaches as well ) was the cheapest option. This way, you could have a car that was quiet most of the time, but could get loud if you wanted it to. Honestly I don't see a problem here. The growl of an engine is just an indicator of its performance . If you designed an intake/exhaust system just to sound good, how is it different from an electronic system which does that ?

  86. iconic muscle car like the Mustang by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    Baloney\. Only a very few Mustangs could be considered muscle cars. They, like Camaros, are pony cars where most had inline sixes and small displacement V8s.

  87. chevy horn in a toyota, reference to Mazda by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    I've never faked an engine noise but back in 1970s I replaced the horn from my 1971 Toyota with a horn from a Chevy, Toyota horn was a measly bleat-bleat where the GM product had more ommf to get people's attention. I see the tagline referencing a Mazda. I also remembered in that decade a friend had a rotary engine Mazda and it was a screamer. This was back in the days when small cars were small powered but with his Mazda he routinely accelerated ahead of those big American cars. But maintenance was a nightmare.

    If going to fake engine noises, have a selection of vehicles from quiet Telsas to way-too-loud-for-city-streets Formula One racers. Now that would be fun to have.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  88. Give the option to change it by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

    I want my fake engine noise to sound like a Jetson's flying car.

    --
    Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
  89. Ecoboost. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    It sounds like crap. nobody wants to buy a Mustang or a F150 that sounds like a honda civic.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  90. Re: This is so stupid. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Have you ever seen a car? Tires are silent? that is completely insane.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  91. Just imagine the same discussion 100 years ago by Cyberax · · Score: 1

    Just imagine the same discussion 100 years ago: "But real horse enthusiasts think that the smell of horse manure is an integral part of the 'horse experience' and the attempts to emulate it by piling bullshit on the passenger seat are inferior to having a real live horse attached to your car".

    Get over it. Engine noise is a noxious emission, sign of imperfect design.

  92. Been like that for many years by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Hasn't it been common to fake the engine sound to some extent for decades? I mean, you've long been able to buy 'tune sets' or whatever they are called, with big, trompet exhausts - the only purpuse of which is to make the engine sound louder. I've always felt vaguely amused when I saw them - this seems very indicative of the kind vain person you refer to as 'a peacock', no doubt in reference to the size of his manhood.

  93. You can't please two masters at once. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    If manufacturers such as Ford are faking cylinders, then it shouldn't be surprising to see them faking engine notes. They're trying to please environmentalists by cutting down the engine; they're using a turbocharger and audio system in an dishonest attempt to please the customer. When said customer actually tries to *use* the engine, they only see how it can't match their expectations.

    It might cut it for the granola-eating, Aspen-attending environmentalist with deep pockets, for they can buy whatever they please. On the other hand, the majority of us really don't have much choice in the matter. Perhaps if the environmentalists were kicked out of auto design and CAFE was abolished, we wouldn't have to wonder if our engine's faking it.

    When pressing the pedal, a full-displacement engine should be the sole source of engine noise - not a tuned speaker nor a turbocharger.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  94. Engine noise is bad by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    I know some people like it... including those morons that screw up their mufflers so their cars sound broken.

    But look at it this way, everything your car does that is not directed towards moving it forward... is wasted energy.

    The heat that comes off the hood or out of the back pipe is wasted energy. Anything above ambient temperature is energy your engine couldn't reclaim from the burning of the gas.

    The sound... ANY sound that the engine makes is wasted energy. A perfect engine would be silent. That noise is the sound of inefficiency.

    I know, some people like the noise. I do too. Mostly because it sounds powerful and is sort of nostalgic. However, it is wasted energy. That means less power. Less fuel efficiency.

    I'd rather have the power and the fuel efficiency then the noise. And for those that really want the noise... put a microphone in the engine, wire it to the stereo, and then let people turn the amplified engine noise on or off.

    A perfect engine would consume all energy from its fuel source. 100 percent conversion. And it would waste NONE of it on noises of any kind unless the purpose of the engine was to make noise. Unless you're driving an air raid siren... that is probably not the point.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  95. Get rid of road noise. by banetbi · · Score: 1

    I don't need the fake engine noise, I would just love for them to get rid if the road noise. So many new cars sound like you are in a wind tunnel at interstate speed.

  96. Re:Noisy cars are good. by piripiri · · Score: 1

    In Switzerland, the Law on Road Traffic sets pedestrians priority on vehicles

    This applies only when pedestrians are expected to be on the road, eg. road crossings or roads having speed limit less than 30 km/h.
    In other locations, if a pedestrian being on the road for no reason gets hurt by a vehicle, the pedestrian is faulty (also the vehicle has a part of responsibility too if it could have been able to avoid the pedestrian or stop on time).

  97. Engine sounds through speaker = bemusing by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

    But I really like what Mini, Jag and some others (lambo?) are doing -- they replicate the *pop* you sometimes got out of hi-strung carburetted cars when you let up on the gas. This pop was made by a bit of unburnt gas going into the pipes when the throttle plates would snap shut.

    The modern version just randomly squirts a bit of gas into the exhaust to make the pop artificially when you let up the gas. And I'm totally cool with this. In my mini it's selectable by sport mode. I love this feature. It reminds me of old sports cars.

    Mine's a polite little pop or two. The F-Type jag sounds like a machinegun, and the Aventador I heard the other day had so many pops on upshift that it could've been confused with an mg-42.

    All artificial, but not piped in through the stereo. A joy to hear in a garage or a tunnel.

    Digital pianos do this too -- they replicate (or for lesser pianos, sample) artifacts of real pianos. Because people found out that a perfectly tuned piano with no mechanical noises is boring.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
  98. Re:thatsracist.gif by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Also, I think you're a racist old fuck. How is "rap shit" music at 1200dB any worse than your 455 also blaring at 1200dB?

    Where at all in my post, did I mention the race of anyone listening to rap shit?

    I think you're the racist if you start playing the race card based on a statement about loud obnoxious music being blared by someone whose race was never mentioned.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  99. My old 240SX (2.4L 4) sounded great by caveat · · Score: 1

    Once I opened up the airbox and got a properly designed full exhaust on it, it had a pretty throaty purr. Not the syncopated thrum of a V, still the flat-scream of a 4, but satisfyingly deep and lush. Guy I knew put a turbo on his, same engine, same exhaust from the cat back actually, sounded like a muffled bass kazoo.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  100. Audi S5 by FreakAlienJobEater · · Score: 1

    My Audi S5 makes an adorable sound when it changes gear. It's the result of a device that spits gas on the exhaust for that exact purpose. I must say I dont care if it's fake - I always have a (fake) orgasm when I hear it. Here's Top Gear UK's take on it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  101. Welcome to the Government. by Dishevel · · Score: 1
    Eco engines and shit are the law. They have to do it.

    The people want the sound. Ford follows the mandates and gives customers what they want.

    Sounds like Ford is doing the best it can under the rules it is forced to follow.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  102. Tachometers by trigggl · · Score: 1

    In the U.S. you'll find that most of the cars that don't have a tachometer are the standards. I guess they figure you only want a standard if you can't afford the automatic. The standards are the lower end cars that they leave the tach off to save money. My Isuzu Rodeo doesn't have one. I do, however, have a pretty loud 4-cylinder engine. I still manage to shift while ignoring the idiot light.

    --
    Ops, I shuld have usd the prevuwe but in.
  103. not just engine noise by MisterToad · · Score: 1

    It's not just engine noise that is faked - - - apparently some car manufacturers modify the power steering to make it more retro. This modification makes feedback from the road to the steering wheel. It causes the steering wheel to jerk around - not much just some

    --
    Dick
  104. ... "the SOUNNNND... of SILENCE"... by billdale · · Score: 1

    Two of my first cars were an BMW Midget, and an MGB. Both had exhaust notes I liked when I first bought them, but it was not long before I realized it was much like having a broken stereo, and all I could listen to-- and was forced to hear even if I didn't want it-- was my very favorite Beatles tune. And, if I wanted to listen to Bob Dylan or The Carpenters, I had to turn up the volume just so I, could hear it over the sound of my otherwise Lennon favorite. It would eventually become unbearable. An engine exhaust-- ANY engine exhaust, even from the most expensive Ferrari, Lamborghini, or Alfa Romeo-- is nothing more than a dirt - simple tune with no surprises, no chord changes or complexities as you have in music, yet we can somehow be lulled into believing there is something desirable about it even though it does little more than make you turn up your volume just so you can hear your radio over the noise, and it slowly contributes not only to your own hearing loss, but those around you that have no choice. I PARTICULARLY hate loud motorcycle exhausts, and even MORE particularly Harleysville that have short, straight pipes that you can hear blocks away. Whenever I hear them, I fantasize of the Axel Foley trick of cramming a banana deep inside the, pipe so that the rider, when he returns to his bike, does not figure out the problem until after his machine has gotten a time-consuming, expensive tow to the repair shop. As for your solution for blind pedestrians, you sound like the dolt whose only tool is a hammer, and so all problems begin to look like nails. The last thing I want is more noise when it's not necessary, forcing EVERY ONE to endure more cacophony even when there are no disabled people around. A much more reasonable solution would be to mandate fifty cents worth of electronics to be added to all new cars, including your beloved ICE- powered dinosaurs, which interact intelligently not only with every deaf pedestrian, but every other child, pet or other creature that is fitted with an inexpensive, mass - produced transponder that will warn ONLY of approaching traffic, and not of vehicles moving away and therefore not a hazard. They could warn of direction, speed, and proximity, even when there is other noise that can be distracting. One of the curiosities of human hearing is that when someone has constantly got their sound system amped to the max so that their ears feel full and ring for hours after removing their ear buds, or after their hearing has already been grossly, damaged by work or other noise, they will get defensive and insist their hearing is just fine, even though you can hear their rap lyrics from their ear buds from across the room. Personally, I treasure my hearing and want to protect it. So, more noise? No thank you. I'd rather listen to the subtleties of the tunes I choose to play on my sound system, without fighting to hear it over your he-man exhaust.

    1. Re: ... "the SOUNNNND... of SILENCE"... by billdale · · Score: 1

      Oops... damned Spell Check "corrected" MG (Midget) to read BMW.

  105. another booking at the Hobbit Hotel by epine · · Score: 1

    If you don't notice a flashing green light barely in your peripheral vision I would start to wonder if you ought to be driving at all.

    At my height, the steering wheel blocks out half the dashboard. And, no, I can't fix this problem with a phone book (even if such a thing was still available).

    My problem is that I'm forced to recline to a halfway recumbent position to keep from mashing my head into the ceiling.

    In many vehicles I end up reclined so far back that I can barely reach the steering wheel. And, no, this is not because I have short arms. It's because the rear passenger window has now entered my peripheral vision. If this strikes you as strange, then I suspect it's been a long while since you spent any quality time with sin/cosine. (I have a wine bottle a mere 2" too tall for one of my cupboard shelves. If I tilt it to 45 degrees it fits just fine.)

    So then I have to crank the seat forward until my knees are striking the front dashboard. Strangely, I don't find this uncomfortable for my legs, unless I wish to move them.

    My peripheral vision is now roughly oriented toward the driver's seat-belt pulley, and my eye level is horizontal to the tint line on the windscreen. By the time I get the steering adjusted to a comfortable position, it's almost a certainty that half the dashboard is occluded by the top half of the steering wheel.

    I can't see stop lights, either, if I'm first to the light and I've pulled up to the stop line, unless I use the old ear-to-shoulder trick—or I spot some other aspect of the intersection control synchronized to the light I'm waiting on.

    What look like large vehicles from the outside are usually just as bad. Sure, the cabin height is increased, but usually they take most of it away with a higher seat height (to better accommodate all those fancy seat motors whose very existence makes the seating position you most desire impossible to achieve).

    You should book a week sometime in the Hobbit Hotel. It will do wonders for your imagination concerning the circumstances that others face. Probably you should do this before participating in the design of any mechanical thing to be used by anyone other than a jet fighter pilot (whose physiques are carefully restricted to the design environment).

  106. I miss the clip-clop of horse hooves... by sebastienguillon · · Score: 1

    Since they're faking it to appeal to nostalgia why not make the sound of a gallopping horse? I wonder how long that bullshit will go on when engines are close to or completely silent.

  107. Re: thatsracist.gif by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

    Do you have statistics that show the percentage of race listening to rap music at stupidly high volume? Probably not... neither do I. However, I can point out (even though you're AC, so I'm really just talking into a hurricane here) that around here the kids listening to said rap music are predominantly white or Asian... not black. Given my area is a pretty well mixed community that's an impressively sad statement.

    Yeah, most rap artists are black. So what? OP didn't make any statement of race, he just made a statement about kids in their cars who have no concept of midrange or treble. They're all about the bass :P

  108. Re: thatsracist.gif by LocalH · · Score: 1

    Well, that escalated quickly.

    --
    FC Closer
  109. Re:I see you trollin, I'm hatin by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm talking shit on that study, because it's a whitewash piece. And I'm talking shit on the "Toyota Pious", because it a horribly designed car (as I stated above), it's a hybrid, not a pure electric(a fact you grossly misstated above), and people who drive them are often the most high-and-mighty that I've ever met. Do you own a Prius? Or are you that sad little WRX owner still smarting from the lashing I gave you last week? Gotta be one of the two. So it turns out you're both trollin and hatin, and you post AC. Take of your mask.

    --
    Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?