Slashdot Asks: Do You Still Use RSS?
Real Site Syndication, or RSS has been around for over a decade but it never really managed to lure regular web users (though maybe it wasn't built to serve everyone). So much so that even Google cited declining usage of Google Reader, at one time the most popular RSS reader service, as one of the two reasons for shutting down the service. With an increasingly number of people looking at Facebook and Twitter for news, we thought it would be a good time to ask the following question: Do you use any RSS reader app? If yes, do you think it is still a good way to keep track of the "new stuff" that your favorite sites publish?
Real Time Syndication, or RSS
How does Real Time Syndication become RSS? Should be RTS?
I've never understood why people have gone away from it. It's the most effective way to track a ton of websites in entirety. I think of my RSS feed as my morning newspaper. I follow literally hundreds of websites, journals, and blogs using it, and I can churn through it all in maybe twenty minutes at my keyboard each day on inoreader.
I would not be reading this if there was not RSS. I don't have time to manually check dozens of sites for updates.
How else would I get my Slashdot article headers?
Use it every day
keeps me up to date with my webcomics and arXiv
I use the Sage Plus plugin for Firefox, and the Feedburner link was how I got to this story.
The real question is, will anyone get here via PointCast?
Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
When the Google reader went away I scrambled to find a replacement. Feedly is by far the best replacement of the bunch and I have paid for all their services to support them.
RSS is far from dead.
Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
RIP Google Reader.
Fuck you, Google.
When iGoogle went away, I whipped up a quick little Javascript that does essentially the same thing. My home page is a collection of RSS feeds. And yes, that's pretty much how I find all the news that I read.
Yes Yes
Next.
I still use RSS for about 50 feeds with about 400 articles a day. The problem are the sources.
The quality is declining. Some feeds only deliver the teaser and a link to the article on the web site.
Even when I offer money, nearly no newspaper is able to deliver a full RSS stream :-(.
Yes, using https://newsblur.com/. It's a very convenient way to keep up with sites of interest.
I have a couple of web sites that people visit to get industry news. I use RSS to collect the official posts from a lot of the companies in those industries so I can republish them on my site. Both readers and publishers (e.g., vendors) report this is nice.
That's pretty much what RSS was designed to do...right?
http://theoldreader.com/
You think I'm refreshing Slashdot on the off chance something interesting is posted? Slashdot is the perfect use case for RSS, about one in 20 articles is quite interesting, which isn't enough to make me want to check the page every day but is interesting enough for me to watch the RSS feed.
I have used Rainmeter for years with the preset New York Times, Wired and Slashdot news feeds, Wired seems to have shut theirs down or changed it as it does not work so I replaced it with NPR.
Yes and yes. It fills a need for content aggregation/summary better than any other technology, especially for tracking low volume/high quality sources.
Apropos of nothing, the recent ad placements on /. really, really suck. They cover so much content and take up so much screen real estate. I don't begrudge any site the need for ads, but seriously, it makes me much less likely to visit the site.
All day, every day, w/ TT-RSS. I've got an RSS search engine bookmarked, and I even use a Twitter to RSS service so I can get a few relevant twitter feeds without the clutter of their horrific interface. With Facebook, news curates you!!! (hahahaha)
Be Excellent To Each Other
Clicks live (RSS) bookmark for Slashdot on toolbar.
Notices story at top of list- "Slashdot Asks: Do You Still Use RSS?"- and clicks to find out more.
Thinks "I guess that's a yes, then".
"Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
I have a number of RSS feeds in Feedly, but I rarely if ever check it, using the "Twitter will tell me if I need to know" method instead.
I use Liferea to collect feeds. IMO, its a simple but enabling technology... a lot better than cramming everything into centralized locations like Facebook.
Most (if not all) RSS clients suck. I'm receiving stuff that normally would be found in a newspaper, why is there no option for a newspaper display option (Columns, pictures, organized with the headlines and first several lines to paragraphs with a link to continue reading more on something that catches your eye?)? Then there's the other problem: there is no standard for what is published via RSS: if I want to put together a page filled only with the latest comics from the web, Dilbert might publish just the image of their latest comic, while TheLeastICouldDo might publish a blog post (and somewhere in there is the comic I am looking for)...meaning I have to bust out the RegEx toolkit just to begin cleaning things up.
Relevant information, more signal, less noise. This the code by which all communication methods prosper and die.
Yep. I've been using TinyTiny RSS (https://tt-rss.org/) since the Original Google Reader went away. Syndicated webcomics is the way to go for those. Hosting my own, and paid for the Android APP. For news, I've not come up with a great solution.
find ~your -name '*base* | xargs chown
I use gReader every day. I have RSS feeds from news sites, tech blogs, and some forums. I even manually browse to the RSS feed of a few forums I use, just to more conveniently see all the new posts. I find forums to be cumbersome and clumsy for discussions. I much prefer email lists or nntp. But RSS feeds make it a tiny bit more usable for me, at least for lower volume forums with lots of little subforums that I'd rather not visit individually.
Google has a long history of taking useful things and then just ending them. Any time I find a google service useful to me, I start planning what i'll do when they yank the rug out from under me. They've been slowly destroying Google Voice (the new web interface is slow and awful compared now)...not sure what to replace that with just yet.
I saw this article via RSS.
I still use RSS feeds to get most of my headlines. After iGoogle bit the dust I moved over to ustart.org and it's been my homepage since. I have noticed that as sites go though upgrades RSS feeds are getting dropped more often than not these days. I've removed quite a few dead feeds for popular sites over the past 2 years due to this unfortunately. I imagine eventually it will disappear to the point it will become functionally extinct.
It's sad the about-face most big sites have taken over the past 15 years from open data to walled gardens. Killing RSS feeds, pulling back public APIs, etc.
I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
I used to use RSS back when it was integrated into Firefox. I could hover over the RSS link for Slashdot and several other sites and see the headlines for the newest articles which I could click to read. Somehow, somewhere along the way, that functionality went away, and I haven't used it since.
I thought it was awesome, and I didn't really care about these "RSS readers" out there b/c I had what I wanted built into my browser.
Not everyone uses tech the same way, and when this way disappeared, RSS became dead to me at least.
I pretty much only read slashdot on it now. Even that is questionable....how does the S2 android app read the news feed? I am only assuming it uses RSS.
Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
I use RSS for all of my news consumption.
I much prefer email lists or nntp.
Exactly. RSS is for people who have confused the web with a mailing list.
I like an online reader because I use it from multiple computers with multiple operating systems, and I never have to worry about syncing what articles I've already seen and/or starred. My current favorite is Inoreader, but I've used The Old Reader and Feedly before, and they get the job done as well.
My feeds are Associated Press, Denver Post, Ars, Slashdot, Boing Boing, Kottke, AV Club, and a handful of web comics that I like. I can skim the headlines, and if there are articles I want to read later, I use the "Send to Kindle" browser plugin to push them out to my Kindle. I would be sad to have to give up my leisure reading workflow if sites stopped supporting RSS.
...in fact, I saw this news item in my RSS reader, Feedly.
I can't think of a web site that I use regularly that doesn't provide a RSS feed.
you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
Yes, I still use RSS - I get it in Outlook 2016 and I use a search folder called "Today" that aggregates my RSS items & emails into a single view.
-B-
Offers RSS feeds for any search you want to define. If you're looking to buy something it's easy to setup to get notifications when something comes up.
I just realized how much I depend on RSS:
- http://gpodder.org/ fetches 20+ podcast subscriptions
- Snarfer (defunct, no website) to follow various news outlets and alert me to fresh xkcd, smbc, etc.
- live bookmarks in Pale Moon to see if something pops up on the various youtube channels I like. No channel subscription with Google account necessary.
- http://showrss.info/ generates a nice rss feed of current tv show episodes which is directly pulled by qbittorrent.
My whole information and entertainment usage would collapse if rss went the way of the dodo.
Pisses me off when websites stop doing RSS. Guess they don't want me ever visiting their website again... (Forget you gocomics! I supported you for a long time but the last update mangled RSS feeds so badly it wasn't worth my money. Now I get all of those comics for free from other sites!) I have been using Liferea on Linux for years. Simple, but gets the job done. I just switched to the "News" app on my Nextcloud instance. This is quite nice because it updates all my devices. I can read and bookmark articles on my tablet during my commute, then when I get home the desktop only shows the feeds I haven't read + the ones I bookmarked. It works really well and all of it remains under my control (my Nextcloud server).
This is probably the single reason why FF is still my primary browser, though I'm happy with it otherwise. It's the best way to peruse headlines because you never have to visit the site. It's probably saved my eyes from more distraction than any other feature I can think of.
So, yes.
I think all of my podcasts come in on RSS feeds at this point. I run a video to audio conversion site for one TV program and the RSS feed is the only way anybody gets the audio (they could just play the video file if they were web-constrained).
Everybody I know who has tried serious podcatching for news has stopped listening to broadcast radio for it.
My God, it's Full of Source!
OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
I use a self-hosted Tiny Tiny RSS as my main source of news for:
* blogs
* slashdot
* YouTube channel uploads
* xkcd
* and so on....
Do people actually expect to go clicking on each site they visit each day to see updates?
I have been using RSS since 2005 it is is still provides 99,9% of all the online content I read. I am using Inoreader which is amazing. All other media delivery options are sub-optimal. I was impressed when I discovered that people use Facebook to get their news. They *deserve* to get fake news
My cellphone ringtone is a ring tone.
I came here through feedly. I changed to feedly because Google killed Google Reader. Inoreader! Let me try that. Without RSS I wouldn't be browsing the Internets.
I use it for casual reading of entertainment (Feedly client):
Not Always Right
xkcd
etc
And I use it in the form of Podcasts for personal and professional (BeyondPod for Android).
Google killing Reader was the last straw in me building around their services... It was the one thing of theirs I went to every day, more than email (at least via the gmail web interface...
I use Feedly now, via an app on my iPhone and Mac, and RSS is still my go-to means for gathering the news of the day for filtering and eventually consuming news. If I had to go hit various sites to find content, I'd pretty much be down to one or two sites a day, and the breadth of my view would be diminished.
I use it every day. Firefox treats an RSS feed as a live bookmark on the toolbar. It's the perfect way to access news sites. I use it to read Slashdot, Ars Technica and a handful of other news related websites.
I don't think I'd bother if I had to use something other than a web browser to effectively use RSS feeds.
screenshot
I use Feedly and Reeder on my Mac and iPhone to read news, rumor sites and hacker culture Every. Single. Day. With RSS I can skim through 27-odd pages full of news in a fraction of the time I would take otherwise. Indispensable.
I stopped using RSS on July 2, 2013 when Google Reader was powered down.
Everyday. Right now, even.
Chewbacon
The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
There is no real replacement for that.
Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
If you're a blogger who likes to get the latest news direct from multiple sources then it comes in handy. I know I use it for that purpose.
Drill baby drill - on Mars
Yes, and I also use CSS.
But that seems to be screwed on Slashdot right now...
a.fsdn.com uses an invalid security certificate.
Related?
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
Yes. I have an RSS reader in Chrome that tracks about two dozen RSS feeds that I use multiple times each day.
I don't know anything that comes even close to RSS for uncluttered and highly targeted news delivery.
I love RSS for all the same reasons marketeers hate it.
Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
How can you not still use RSS? There's so much information on the web in so many different place; you really want to spend 4 hours checking every site for an update every day?
I currently have 119 feeds on my commafeed install (self hosted web based rss feed reader) ranging from news (yes i found this article from the rss feed) to comics to a buttload of youtube channels.
I don't have time to check every single one of those 119 sites daily to check for something new, commafeed gets them all for me and i just check that when i get home from work, check the interesting looking titles and it's done.
Every site which has periodic updates should offer RSS, there is so much data out there that moves so fast you can so easily miss things. RSS feeds keeps that all to hand in an extremely quickly viewed way. A quick glance at the title and a 'marked as read' button click can save you so much time and effort when you've got hundreds of sources of data you are interested in.
Oh and in the time it's take me to type this 24 more new items have popped up in my commafeed. Only one of the articles is of interest to me (a youtube video) so i can simply open the youtube link in another window, click one button, 'mark all as read', and have saved myself having to check around a dozen different websites.
Before RSS i used to have my bookmarks with '(updates mon,wed,fri)' next to them; how i ever lived like that i will never know.
Aren't the Slashboxes you can configure on the right column of Slashdot powered by RSS feeds? I use those daily. (Unfortunately, the "Sci-Fi News" box is stuck with data from over a year ago.)
Used the way others have already commented; also use as a simple way to publish alert-related things from my own projects to interested clients, both internally and for public consumption. I've tried more "modern" systems for the latter, but nothing is as universal. Simple, well-supported. What's not to like?
Besteht way to keep all news in one app.
I refuse to rely on Facebook or Twitter--especially Facebook--for my news. Some of my favorite sites have been censored or even banned, especially from FB.
All my websites RSS feeds are set up to use FeedBurner. Google no longer does AdSense for FeedBurner and has abandoned FeedBurner for several years. I'm looking at alternatives.
http://www.wpbeginner.com/opinion/stop-using-feedburner-move-to-feedburner-alternatives/
I subscribe to several repos at GitHub. When a new release comes out, I know. It's really helpful to help keeping things up-to-date. I use Thunderbird to subscribe to the feeds. On the personal/fun side, I subscribe to a few Tumblrs.
RSS is useful to keep track of blog like sites that are update infrequently. I don't want to check the site everyday, but an RSS feed allows me to easily.
Yep, I use RSS, every day. At this point, it's Feedly, because it syncs across desktop/tablet/phone, on separate systems.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
I use it to read slashdot, several websites and to get a number of tv shows.
Best way to keep all news in one app.
Only a professional cares, but Aaron Swartz named his product RSS, and it's still RSS.
I live in RSS (Rssowl) every morning. I get all the news I need and can make selective choices about which ones I read (Google News, for instance, posts a lot of Sports crap I couldn't care less about, so I can see the title and know it's not worth my time to click.
I'm dismayed by the number of sites that no longer provide RSS feeds (I'm looking at you, Daily Kos), and I'm disappointed that RSS aficionados are letting the RSS clients slide by without improvement (Rssowl v2.2.1 was last released at the end of 2013).
We RSS BELIEVERS need to band together and tell the major sites they need to support RSS clients; the software's free, and they can still inject their ads!
Its far more convenient to look at news from multiple sources in one interface.
There are also a bunch of sites I see articles from via RSS, in Feedly, that I would never bother visiting individually.
Yes. I use Digg Reader. And the CTO of Digg replies when I Tweet that there is a problem with the service. And years after they opened it they still provide the service for free and without any visible attempt to monetize it.
Also, notably this is the first time I read a /\?$/ headline where the answer wasn't no. Actually when I read headlines with question marks my bicameral mind (the "reading voice"?) automatically reads a no at the end of headlines with a question mark. As in: "Can McDonald's finally make a premium burger work? No."
-- I was raised on the command line, bitch
RSS is great for the end user, but there is no practical way to profit from advertisement with it so the big boys are going to kill it.
I have access to hundreds of podcasts through RSS, and they work out the advertisement revenue through the podcast content itself, much like a radio broadcast. RSS is light weight and allows a server to serve up many clients, so it is suitable for lots of different things, as long as none of those things need you to profit off page views.
“Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
... because hipsters want you to use Twitter, because is "cool".
Is there a way to read multiple RSS feeds on a single page using my browser?
No, I do not want to make an account on somebody's web site which combines feeds for me, I just want an application or web browser plugin that does it for me.
Thanks for any help.
I thought they killed it (along with iGoogle) to force people over to Google+? Whatever the reason, I moved over to Feedly and still use it daily. Unfortunately, Yahoo Pipes (which I used to automatically filter some of the more verbose feeds) is also gone with no viable replacement.
Support Right To Repair Legislation.
I tried RSS back in the late aughts - problem was, nearly everything I read at the time was a webcomic, and their RSS feeds amounted to little more than update notifications. Full syndication was rare then, I can't imagine how rare it is now.
Do I use RSS? No. But the feed on my webcomic has gotten over 8,000 hits since I added a redirect from the old feed location a few weeks ago, so it's definitely still in use.
Every day. Multiple times per day. I run TT-RSS, and access it from any browser, or if I have to kill some time, from the mobile version on my phone.
I’m still not sure how people get “news” from Twitter or Facebook, unless they literally spend all day on Twitter or Facebook. And why wait for people to sometimes post a link to a good article (between sharing their meals, games, and personal activities) when I can get it right from the source?
--Jim (me)
In short, yes.
In long, I follow practically no website that doesn't have a feed. If I'm really desperate to follow a site without a feed, I have written a small set of scripts to quickly generate feeds for the website that I then add to my RSS reader. Which I also wrote myself because tt-rss wasn't around back then and I wanted a server-side solution that didn't depend on a client running all the time.
So, yes, for me, RSS is alive and kicking. Oh, and I also wrote a RSS-to-Mastodon service. Yay for RSS!
See my blog for my free opinions.
I'm an old fart, but the VAST majority of my internet consumption is via RSS. Loved Google Reader until they kneecapped it. Switched over to Feedly after Reader's untimely death.
I rarely have to leave Feedly, and thus never notice when sites like /. fubar their CSS file (like they apparently have today)
I made a program back in 2006 which I still maintain and use. It displays RSS headlines on scrolling LED signs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
https://www.kitchi-rss.com/
It's still simply the most efficient way to stay on top of various news streams. Neither twitter nor facebook (or Google+) can compete with that. I'm using netvibes to collect them.
I use Tiny Tiny RSS (http://tt-rss.org). Better than Google Reader, self hosted, keeps track of article status across multiple browser and app instances, allows to extract the message body from the web page using XPATH expressions.
Can't imagine life without it.
The question should really just be a poll. Since that's essentially what it is anyway. Yes, I use it daily - I was bummed when iGoogle was shut down, but use a similar alternative now, checking it several times a day and using it as my seach page occasionally. I haven't seen any better alternatives.
As a second source of aggregation, I try Google Kiosk. However, Kiosk is not available on the desktop. So I only use it as a way to explore new feeds when I am done with feedly and I am really really bored. Note that Google News is not available where I live.
Note that I did remove a lot of weblogs that were just aggregating articles from other websites. I really hate when I read "Digital Foundry is telling this", "Anandtech did that analysis", "Ars Technica complains about Mac", etc. I do not see the point on those websites if they are not adding any value at all.
Took me some time to digest Google Reader end of life. Initially tried some RSS reader before falling in love with Inoreader (web and app), it's my main source of news with the sites/blogs I follow.
wolruf@gmail.com
I have a Feedly (Pro) tab opened any time my PC is open. The vast majority of content I consume comes through this. The two most notable exceptions are Facebook and Twitter, two things that I find it almost impossible to keep up with because of a) no RSS and b) algorithms constantly juggling how things appear in the timeline.
I literally have no idea how regular people consume content. I can only assume the vast majority of it comes through their social networks these days.
I can't imagine life without it!
Sig?
I use Feedly too due to it's good cross platform support.
Also I appreciate how people like Randall Munroe handle the streams compared to someone like Scott Adams. I try to keep that in mind, when I put down money somewhere...
I use RSS and it's a lifesaver. I do not use for tracking news sites, but to track software updates in Slackware and other projects I follow. It's very useful and convenient.
Since I use KDE, I have a simple RSS Plasma Extension installed for that. Whenever there's an update which interests me, I get a notification. Before that I used the RSS plugin for Claws Mail.
-- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
Some feeds only deliver the teaser and a link to the article on the web site.
This is precisely why I stopped using it.
I have managed to live through the past decade without even knowing what RSS is for. Well, to each his own.
ditto
Agreed, it got worse. Still there is nothing better by a long way :-(.
I fount this story in my rss reader. it's the only way to have my news synced on my phone when coverage becomes flaky. And besides that, now that everyone is building APIs to everything, this is one of the simples things to connect two services. Anyone remembers Yahoo pipes?
bickerdyke
I use feedly on my phone and BazQux on my PC. I prefer to skim the sites and read just the articles I want. I can cover a lot more ground with a reader. I also like that both remember where I left off on a site.
"If you are on fire you can just stop, drop, and roll. If you fall into Lava you are just dead." - my 5yr old daughter
...so yes, I do. And it continues to annoy me when I find websites that don't support RSS or Atom. It's not that hard.
-- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
Yes, that's how I got to this Slashdot article.
Yeah, a lot of webcomics just use as a notification system... but I'm fine with that. I only find it a very minor annoyance to open a new tab (and no more than opening a new tab for a Slashdot post so I can read the comments!) Better than nothing, and I've stopped reading some webcomics completely because they didn't offer an RSS feed at all and I didn't find it worth my time to make an extra effort to visit them regularly (even when they have a consistent update schedule.)
Actually, considering what a lot of RSS services seem to be doing, I think I'm in a minority that I'm using it to mostly skim headlines, instead of a summary dashboard like a Facebook or twitter timeline.
I think summary became more and more common as people figured out that there was no monetization metrics when people stick to RSS. Without that proof that human eyes are looking at an ad, that check for a fraction of a penny doesn't get cashed.
Using feedly now that the original Google reader is gone. We need a slashdot poll asking this question
I just accessed this article from Feedly. Much easier to scan a list of one line headlines than wading through all the websites I track. Also, makes it easier to monitor niche sites with few updates or that I visit rarely. I find news via social media intrusive, blinkered, and stifling.
Short answer - yes! I'm always disappointed when a blog I want to following doesn't provide an RSS feed. Thunderbird lets me very conveniently get email and RSS all in one place.
I use http://www.inoreader.com/ for my RSS feeds, and I love it!
I don't use RSS for things like Slashdot as much as I used to, but I still read all of my webcomics through there. For me, RSS is ideal for websites that post one or two updates a day. For websites with more frequent updates, I usually just visit the front page.
---- I'll take you in a Hunt deathmatch any day.
If I can't get it through an RSS feed, I don't read it. When Google Reader went away I tried a few alternatives, and settled on InoReader. It's not perfect (ads, a bit too intrusive for me to leave off my ad blocker), but it is serviceable. Keyboard navigation of entries is laudable.
"I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
My BSc thesis project was a web-based RSS reader (with some bells and whistles that I dropped immediately after I got my degree), which I still use today. I'm usually not one for lofty ideologies, but even I think RSS is useful in helping the web stay decentralized (i.e. not revolve entirely around Facebook). (By the way, if anyone happens to be interested in said RSS reader, you can check it out here: http://readrover.net/ You can email me for an invite)
On live bookmarks
I haven't found anything that beats a quick RSS scan to keep up with both secure internal feeds (using basic auth) and public feeds.
NetNewsWire synchs read state across Mac, iPhone, iPad use. It's fast, simple, and quick to scan.
Too bad that some sites no longer offer RSS/Atom support.
I certainly do use RSS, namely the simple Sage add-on for Firefox, and I came to this story from there.
And I use IFTTT and other tools to create and filter RSS feeds of websites lacking one.
It's THE BEST way to follow a bunch of websites. Twitter/Facebook has too much noise to signal ratio. With RSS you can break the content into categories, browse and star interesting articles and "mark as read" entire folders. You can cover a ton of sites throughly whie attempting the same on social media websites is too fleeting. RSS really is like a modern newspaper.
I'm not a Linux user but I play one on TrueNuff.tv
In fact, the only reason I saw this article was because it came up in my RSS reader (feedly).
I consume media from a lot of sources and RSS is how I like to aggregate it. I'd hate to have to go to 30/40 sites to see what's new.
And how I read a lot of news.
Feedly aggregates the news sources I care about through RSS- it's just as great as it was years ago, and I'm happy to be a paying customer to ensure that it continues to work for years to come!
Podcasts and RSS news feeds easily account for over 90% of my media consumption.
If a media site offers an RSS feed, I might subscribe to it for awhile to see if it offers the kind of content I'm interested in.
If a media site does not offer RSS, I will probably ignore it unless I know for certain that I want to read its articles etc.
pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
RSS is still the most elegant way to aggregate content. I works, it's simple, it's efficient.
I use TinyTiny RSS (https://tt-rss.org/) for the nifty web interface on my desktop and the app on my phone that share a common database (IMAP-like).
As someone already said, it's my morning paper. The quality went down, and I dropped some sources, but all in all, this is the most efficient way for me to follow all the media I am interested in.
No RSS feed, I won't bother to follow the source any other way.
In my opinion, Scientology is a cult you should avoid.
I use RSS for about 30 sites and maybe 150 articles a day. I use RSS to let me read the actual content of the web pages without having to view the clutter that most of them have. Also, my eyesight is not perfect and with my RSS reader (newsbeuter) I can choose the font and its size more readily than in a browser. I'm not surprised that feeds only deliver a teaser -- they want you to go to their web page and click on adverts.
Yes I'm using RSS - I aggregate my feeds via netvibes.com .
If it didn't exist - would have to invent something like it to avoid the drudgery of sifting and sorting for viable news and information.
Lodragan Draoidh
The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
$ sudo apt-get install rss2email
$ r2e new your@yourdomain.com
$ r2e add feedname http://feed.url/somewhere.rss
$ r2e run
Add as many feeds as you wish. Only new articles will be sent to your email each run.
The last command should be put into your crontab, if you want things be sent you automatically. (and that's pretty much the whole point.)
Thanks Aaron Swartz! ( author of rss2email )
I consume about 8 RSS feeds everyday.
My favorite is using various RSS feeds to display instant notifications on my phones lock screen via IFTTT
weather warnings, currency exchange, local news etc.
I wish RSS was supported more. Sadness.
n/t
You're right, it's not a big deal.
So why is it so hard for the editors to get right?
And hundreds do where I work. We're actually considering expanding usage onto an internally hosted instance to allow users add their own websites. Looking at internet traffic we see that thousands of people are reading news all day long. That eats into productivity. So how do you recoup productivity without being a totalitarian environment by restricting internet usage and calling people out creating awkward work situations?
You give your people the tools to empower.
We expect people spend 20-30 minutes a day reading articles vs 4 hours across the entire day. And while reading those articles, people will also get interspersed between, articles regarding cyber security that they should be reading.
Engaging your employee base/Encouraging active involvement should be the #1 priority of every IT org since we're the folks who actually meet everybody. Our clients are important to us and as such, so is their cyber health.
Yes. I do. A lot.
ruurd
I'd love to see the stats from Slashdot on RSS usage since it's been available. Are you seeing a drop off?
Most media entities publishing podcasts do so via an RSS feed, among other options. Not everyone's willing to go on iTunes or some other aggregator to download episodes.
I read Slashdot purely on RSS, along with some news sites, Dilbert, and a few other comics, plus some other stuff. I use Feedly (use to use Google Reader), and an app on my phone to sync with it.
I use Feedly.
Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
Using Feedly, but I'd still be using it regardless... it's just the one I got used to after Google Reader kicked the bucket.
I also don't consider neither Facebook nor Twitter as sources for information... they are social media, and basically the worst places to get information from, apart from photos and updates from family and friends.
RSS is not only a good way to keep track of stuff being published on favorite blogs and websites... it's the best current way, period. It's too bad Google was blind enough not to understand that, but it's their loss.
Guaranteed. Every time. I like RSS, but this is the wrong forum to take a survey like this. Ask a random sample of the general population and maybe .1% will have the foggiest. Ask on Slashdot and you'll hear about the mountain man who reads it on his Amiga using Mosaic running on a Sun IPC via X tunneled over thicknet, "which is clearly better but these damned kids can't be bothered to set it up right."
Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
We use it. Easiest way to do news aggregations on an Intranet or web portal.
Yes, I still use RSS!
Not just for news headlines, but also service status for a bunch of stuff. Honestly, it's the easiest thing for "providers" of any type to support given that it's just HTTP so even if a very small number of "users" actually use it, it's still prolly worth it.
All the time
Never really caught on
We'll make great pets
I use it with Inoreader. A great way to keep up with uncluttered information.
I concur, and find your post to be all too typical of /. moderation -- your post deserves more points because it helps spur an important discussion people should have but probably aren't having: what happens when you choose to let few people or organizations determine what you're likely to encounter?
When people choose few sources for their information (Pat Reader gets all her information from Facebook, for instance) you'll find censorship, tracking, invasion of one's personal life via proprietary software, and many other things most people would find wholly undesirable if they knew even a little bit about how computers worked.
That's a big part of why RSS should be considered critical infrastructure: RSS lets us do the decentralization we need and still enjoy the conveniences offered by centralizing at the endpoint which can help preserve our privacy and our liberty.
Digital Citizen
For one thing it's how I brows /. stories.
It's also how I follow many webcomics, some blogs, pre-announced downtime from my ISP (PlusNet), some gaming news sites, and many other things.
I use a local Tiny-Tiny RSS instance to do this (it's what I switched to when Google pulled the plug on Reader).
I also went to the trouble of writing a scraper for Frontier Developments' Forums developer accounts activity so I could have an RSS feed with just the developer posts in it. Many other people make use of that as well.
I hate finding a new site or blog that looks interesting only to find it has no, or only a broken, RSS feed.
Tiny Tiny RSS: https://tt-rss.org/fox/tt-rss/...
I'm using Vienna, and I have probably 100 subscriptions that I monitor at least daily. I find RSS a good way to look for things of interest. And yes, I did see this post pop up on the Slashdot RSS feed and that's how I got here.
For those of you who accuse RSS users of being Luddites, bite me! It's one thing to say "That's not a tech I use," or even "That's a technology that is showing its age." It's another thing to insult people who don't happen to use your favorite tool/technique. That's particularly true for those of you who have less than 20 years experience with the Internet. (Says the guy who uses the same email address for the last 30+ years.)
Of course, you can profit through RSS.
A lot of the feeds I get show banner ads in the content. But more than that, it's not about profiting directly from RSS, it's about providing a very simple way to gently remind viewers to come read the full content--and see all the ads on the page.
Marketers use all sorts of methods to drive viewers to websites. An RSS feed will bring people to a site multiple times a day (more views) instead of coming once per day (e.g., over morning coffee). A good headline and an interesting excerpt--followed by a link to the full content on the website--is an excellent way to pull in eyeballs. Additionally, if the ads are tailored to the content, it helps to target the ads and increases the chances of clicks/conversions.
I arrived here at this Slashdot article via Feedly. I was a Google Reader beta and have used a couple desktop clients but found them more cumbersome to keep in sync between multiple devices so web-based is how I roll. I blame/thank RSS for keeping my mind open to viewpoints different than mine. I've made good friends by following RSS feeds. The deeper significance of RSS is that it allows anyone to collect data from numerous sites and keep them organized and notated outside of keeping an insane amount of bookmarks.
In IRC, SeaMonkey's web browser, web sites like http://aqfl.net/ and http://slashdot.org/ etc.
Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
Are you CRAZY? Usenet isn't secure at all. Gopher is where it's at!
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
No really (not obLinux)
$ diff -h dumpold dumpnew | grep "^>"
where dump[old|new] are webpage flatfiles (links -dump ) catted together. Privacy.
Someone recently laughed when I mentioned I still use RSS. Their loss.
Feedly, by the by.
Apart from FB I pretty much only use RSS. Most sites still support it.
And the fact that FB doesn't is annoying and discourages me from visiting the site.
I use it to get news, web comics and blogs and stuff. It's also pretty easy on the my phone's data as it doesn't load all the other content on webpages. Also how I found this article
Same here, I use Feedly for backend and if I want to access my feed from a PC; use gReader Pro on my phone. My RSS collection is my primary source of news. I even have a couple of low volume Twitter feeds in there (via twitrss.me).
Yes.
Over the years I've gone back and forth, using RSS, then not using it, then using it again. I used to use the RSS reader in Trillian, but feed management was an issue, so I stopped. I returned again just after Reader was shuttered and used Feedly via Reeder for iOS. I couldn't get into it as much on the desktop. Now that I'm on Android, I use gReader, but it's all still Feedly under the hood. I do most of my RSS triage on my mobile in gReader, send articles related to work or that need further action to Instapaper, then pick them up on my desktop using that service. General news I just read on my mobile device.
To be fair to Scott Adams, I think that was his syndicate's call. His personal blog has a full feed and his comic was the last of the universal feeds to go notification only as well as the only one still working at all.
And, FWIW, FreshRSS is great. I probably wouldn't read /. at all anymore if I wasn't getting it in RSS. There's probably one post per day that I don't just skim, and maybe one every 3 or 4 days that I click into to read the comments. I almost never comment anymore, because it's invariably not worth having clicked into them in the first place anymore, but here we are.
There are some sites which move kind of fast, and so I generally just keep them open, but for the 8 or 12 sites I want to keep up on, but not get flooded by, RSS works perfectly.
I like music
Ironically, I use RSS to read Sladhdot, Distrowatch and of course Opera Desktop Team news, Opera 12 and thus Opera Mail treat RSS as "messages", allowing you to read RSS in a mail reader. Who needs an "app"?
RSS is my portal to the Internet. I don't get any news from social media. What I get from social media isn't "news" in any meaningful sense. It's interaction with friends that I rarely see in person.
sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
That's how I get all my TV-series on uTorrent. I'm not going to hunt them down individually by myself.
Best way to aggregate 100+ sites. I use Feedly.
I dimly recall seeing ads in RSS feeds back in the day but that may have only been on one or two sites. Fact is, while RSS is great for the consumers of information it's not nearly as useful for content creators, at least where monetization is involved.
I just shifted to following a handful of artists on social media - the general trend of webcomic update notifications integrates seamlessly into the rest of my twitter feed, and it seems to be easier to interface with some creators, at least casually.
There is no way of keeping track of news without RSS/Atom.
I'm still pissed that they killed iGoogle.
Nowadays, I use Thunderbird for RSS-Feeds and some filters for webcomic-sites that all use the same sender-address.
What do you mean by the word “still”? Of course I use it, otherwise I would need to visit 100—200 websites daily. As for Facebook and Twitter: news don't happen on Facebook so it's irrelevant, Twitter still has RSS, it's just hidden.
Why, yes, I do still use Really Sloppy Slashdot. Isn't that obvious?
You have utm_medium=feed on the link, so i believe you know how many read news using some sort of rss feed.
"life is a joke, and someone is laughing at me"
So much so that I rolled my own aggregator.
https://www.redfivesoftware.co...
No point reading 10 different feeds on a subject when you can get them all in one listing and I quite like the "tag cloud" feature i created for it.
I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
We're technical people working in technical fields. If you think getting an acronym wrong is "Not a big deal" then you are either an epic fail at your current job or you don't belong here.
#DeleteFacebook
Yes, I still use RSS every day. I initially started using RSS as a way to manage my favorite webcomics. For this purpose, it is still a killer application.
Do you find yourself checking your favorite comic sites every day, or even multiple times a day? With RSS, I don't have to. I add the site feed to FeedDemon in my Comics folder, and I can easily see when a new comic is posted. The only problem is when the site changes their software around, the RSS URL can change and you just stop receiving updates until you fix it.
This works for a lot of things. I use it for low-traffic Reddit subs that I want to see 100% of the posts for without having to visit them individually. Obviously, I use it to monitor news posts for people, games, and projects I follow. I know when updates and patches to games roll out without having to visit the site every day. I have even subscribed to certain Twitter personalities that don't post very frequently.
Another killer application of RSS is deal feeds. I subscribe to a handful of sites like Hot Deals Club, BensBargains, Dealcatcher, etc. I don't read them directly -- I use a feature of FeedDemon called Watches. I can set up keyword triggers and be notified when I receive a feed update with that keyword(s).
Let's say I'm shopping for a new SSD. I create a new watch called "SSD" and I put "SSD" as the keyword. Every time I get a hit, it shows up in my watches under that heading. I basically get informed of any sales on SSDs anywhere. I can even limit the folder so I only get hits from my deal feeds. Otherwise, I just ignore the deal feeds folder and just mark them read every time I refresh my feeds.
FeedDemon literally saves me hours a day I used to spend just going through my bookmarks folder. It also saves me money when I'm shopping for something that I don't need right away.
There's too much going on these days to personally keep up with it all without wasting a significant amount of time browsing and skimming every day. I think Agents are going to be big once they really get going. Alexa and Siri and Cortana are the "rock on a stick" version of real Agents. Once they mature, we'll be better able to monitor the things we're interested in and get summaries of new topics instead of the same shit repeated over and over at every site.
Off course, I use it allot, including for SlashDot !
Next?
http://undecidedgames.blogspot.com
Exactly. Like a doctor telling his patient they have ALS...oops, no he meant to say IBS instead.
When Google shut down its RSS reader I noodled around and landed on Feedly. They try to upsell me all the time, but it is not a big annoyance. Their free service feels like RSS, and I think it still uses RSS. I have a broad range of periodicals covered in my feed. Maybe 50. From the Register to Variety to the NYT. With a couple of the periodicals I actually pay for e-subs sao I can read in. I can parse headlines nationally in about an hour. I never look at Facebook for news.. Or Google much either. It is creepafied by my past viewing. How can something be new if it is always based on my past habits. It produces a fallacy like Amazon's shopping tracker, which is a hoot with the crap it serves up. I do not want news tailored to my past interests by a bot. I want human editors in quality publications to tell me what is interesting TODAY. Same reason I don't like robot radio streams. I listen to Radio Paradise, a human-curated eclectic stream and I get informed and surprised by some people who know and love music. The expression gets used, but in reality it is sort of hard to actually surprise one's self. Much easier if somebody else does that job for you.
"No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
Love it... please never stop. Use it on my phone and have that synced with all my different other devices. As I go about my day I look at a multitude of sites and the more interesting ones I share or push tabs to browsers to read later.
I had to click "open in browser" just to make this post. Just for Fark and /.
It was barely useful when it worked. Seems like I'd no sooner get it working and it would break. RSS no longer available or the reader simply refused to connect to it anymore. No need for up to the minute stories anyhow.
RSS got me here, and it's my personal news aggregator and podcast collector of choice. And I really like to read it on my phone in the subway and to listen to new audiobooks and sounds of friends in the evening. It's Owncloud News and Cloudnews here. And simply iTunes for podcast, as this is the only useful cast for it. https://github.com/owncloud/ne... https://itunes.apple.com/de/ap...
I read RSS every day using Feedly and I can't think of a better way to get updates from all those dozens of web-sites. Twitter can't convey anything much more than a URL. Facebook is a mess.
Using and even developing my own feed reader called BazQux.
"News is an education for adults" -- heard this in one TED talk and really like the idea.
Social media is an awful source of news. Good if you just see funny cats and at least get some pleasure. But most of the time you'll see articles carefully designed to make money from your attention. Or you get to know something not really important about life of your friends or celebrities (not the real life, only the part that they want to show you and in a way they want to show you). In all cases you get lowest possible quality of information to time spent ratio.
And there is a gambling factor -- sometimes you'll get something really funny/interesting. And like a lab mouse you pull the lever (scroll the page) to get more. FOMO, comparing yourself to others all this adds up and you'll get social media anxiety, lost time and no knowledge.
What's good in blog is that it's usually has some theme. You don't see cats/selfies/celebrities in a programming blog. More than this -- most blogs are written by people who want to tell something, enthusiasts not SMM people. And blogs are personal -- authors don't tailor opinions to yours.
And RSS readers allow to read multiple different blogs. You could have folder for fun/comics stuff, folder for programming, for personal development, children, cooking, music, anything. And read what you like to read now. And don't re-read it again, don't visit many sites and look on the fluff around articles, bookmark what you like, search, filter. All in one place.
Besides RSS my reader allow you to subscribe to FB/Twitter/Instagram accounts, and some users read only social media but in RSS reader just to get all these features.
Unfortunately blogs are out of fame now. Everybody had a blog and posted their opinions a decade ago. Now people create FB/Instagram/Twitter/SnapChat/etc. account and post party pictures or jokes. So RSS usage declines. But I don't believe it will go away. It's just too convenient to get news this way and quality of news is usually much better here. If there will be a new platform where people will write interesting things RSS readers will just add support for this platform.
It occurs to me that /. could answer that question themselves by looking at the hits on their rss urls.
This space for rent.
I've been happy with Newsblur.com: the UI has a number of improvements over Google Reader — especially the trainer which allows you to prioritize keywords, domains, authors, tags, etc. up or down (great if you follow people who share things on multiple topics and you're just not interested in one of their hobbies) and the option to have it automatically load the remote article text, which is configurable per-site — perfect for sites which only publish a snippet of the full article. The social features are decent but definitely show the market fragmentation since the number of users is so much smaller than when almost everyone was on Google Reader.
Beyond the technical aspects, there are two things which I really like about Newsblur:
1. A non-bubble business model: it's a lean but reportedly profitable service, which means you're not looking to move as soon as the venture capital runs out
2. It's all open-source: https://github.com/samuelclay/... has the entire site and the official Android and iOS clients
I still use RSS, and don't follow sites when they don't provide a feed. Why should I have to work for it? After a long search when Google Reader died, I decided on Inoreader: https://www.inoreader.com/ And I actually pay for it, which shocks both of us.
Still no idea what, if anything, it does or did, or what anyone would use it for.
Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
I likewise switched to Feedly when Google abandoned Google Reader. I have a couple hundred feeds in my list. I won't go so far as to say I wouldn't be browsing the internets without RSS, but I certainly wouldn't have time to cast such a wide net of interests.
RSS is one of the best things on the net, which is why I would not be surprised to see it wither and die.