Slashdot Mirror


Feeding Through Nutrient Patches

Eric Krout writes: "Thanks to the U.S. Department of Defense, nutritional patches may be available by 2025 for a soldier in combat who (does not have access to / cannot waste time eating) a traditional meal as we know it today. The patch may consist of a tiny microchip that, after first determining exactly what your body needs, transfers vitamins to your body transdermally. Goodbye Penguin Mints, hello Penguin Patch! "

230 comments

  1. addicted to food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and here, in the overcoming addictions sections, ones that will cure you from that pesky need to eat and the jonesing for nutrition ...

  2. Hey! by prizog · · Score: 1

    I already patented that years ago, when I worked for Microsoft. How else do you think we kept our slaves^Wminions^Wprogrammers fed, during the long nights chained to their desks.

    1. Re:Hey! by mcrandello · · Score: 1

      "I already patented that years ago, when I worked for Microsoft."

      That would be the ultimate "Flat Food", now wouldn't it?

    2. Re:Hey! by rigau · · Score: 1

      Thats weird. i though no one (except for bill's 12 year old cousin) spent any time working on M$ products and that is why they were so buggy. I guess software would never have that many buggs in it unless they tried really hard to make it that way.

    3. Re:Hey! by prizog · · Score: 1

      >>Thats weird. i though no one (except for bill's 12 year old cousin) spent any time working on M$ products and that is why they were so buggy. I guess software would never have that many buggs in it unless they tried really hard to make it that way.<<

      We work very hard on our buggs at Microsoft!
      We don't putt in show stoppers, because we want to shipp products. Instead, we putt in minorr, but irritating buggs. You might notice one of themm if you are using Internet Explorer to postt to Slashdot - we change yourr spelling!

      Moderators: it's funny!

    4. Re:Hey! by DGregory · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the difference between nutrient patches from another company and MS nutrient patches are that from the other company you'll get 100% of your nutritional needs... the MS ones you have to take it off and put it on every so often, upgrade to MS Nutrient Patch 2000 (or die as they EOL MS NP 99). You also can't wear a regular anti-smoking patch, you'd have to wear MS Nico-patch or you'll have a conflict between the two patches.

      I'm having visions of MS taking over the world and it ain't a pretty sight.

  3. Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2

    I've actually had a few MRE's.. Theyre not bad, not big, and dont really weigh much.

    Bowie J. Poag
    Project Founder, PROPAGANDA For Linux (http://metalab.unc.edu/propaganda)

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by MichaelH · · Score: 4

      I've spent weeks on nothing but MRE's.

      The constipation they induce is sort of handy in a field environment. They are, however, bulky to anyone who makes their living out of a rucksack. They're also really hard to look at after a couple of days.

      The fun part comes when you make little explosives out of the chemical heaters that come with them. 2 liter bottle + 100 mph tape + a little water + whatever the hell it is that boils when you add a little water = loud noise. Toss in some chemlight goop before sealing, and you have instant (and violent) Pollack.
      ------------
      Michael Hall
      mphall@cstone.nospam.net

      --

      Michael Hall
      mph.puddingbowl.org

    2. Re:Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by swdunlop · · Score: 1

      Try living on them, and T-rations for a year or so. *shudder* If I ever have to look another omlette in the face..

    3. Re:Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by Python · · Score: 2
      LOL. I remember when those first came out and we made "field expedient entertainment devices" with them... or FEED for short. Same recipe, small bombs, heater, tape and water.

      Ah... nothing produces things like this faster that a bunch of bored 11B's sitting at a range playing the hurry up and wait game.
      --
      Python

      --

      Python

    4. Re:Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by Python · · Score: 2
      've actually had a few MRE's.. Theyre not bad, not big, and dont really weigh much.

      True (although, try humping enough for a week or more... they take up more space than you think), but you still have to stop and eat those MREs, and sometimes you just can't stop to eat - so you go without. Eating is a very low priority in combat (even though you have to do it), so its get cut out of the plan sometimes - even though, as I said, you need to eat. Time is finite.

      So something like this patch would do away with that problem, at least temporarily so that missions could still be met without undoly reducing combat effectiveness in those units.
      --
      Python

      --

      Python

    5. Re:Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by Chas · · Score: 2

      And you wonder why your 91B's get peeved at you!

      They wanted to do the fun stuff themselves! Not patch you up afterward!

      Well, at least you didn't gross people out with the recipie for the chocolate "field pudding" from the hot chocolate mix, creamer, sugar, and water.....

      Former 91B (Medic)


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    6. Re:Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by Chas · · Score: 2

      Bought my first Firebird (used) from an ex-Army Reserve guy. What do I find in the compartment over the back wheel? C-Rations. This stuff was older than I was (I was 20 at the time)! If I'd had the courage to actually open it, I probably could have used the stuff as grout filler in the bathroom in my barracks. People bitch and moan about MRE. I say, give 'em C-rats for a couple days. MRE's look a lot tastier after that.


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    7. Re:Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by Mai+Longdong · · Score: 1

      Anything is better than ham and motherfuckers.....I always liked Lurp rats. And yeah, I still wear my P-38 on my dog-tags.

    8. Re:Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by prairieson · · Score: 1

      "I say, give 'em C-rats for a couple days. MRE's look a lot tastier after that."
      Yeah, except for that one lucky SOB in ten-thousand that gets the C's with beanie-weenies, canned peaches and the 'John Wayne Bar". Now there was bargaining power.

      And once they perfect the food patch, the Gov't. can start inducing other "performance enhancing nutrients"... you won't have to sleep for a week and you won't pay any attention to that NATO round that just shattered your femur.

      --
      Quomodo cogis comas tuas sic videri?
    9. Re:Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by zantispam · · Score: 1

      Meals Ready to Eat...

      Three lies for the price of one.

      Here's my copy of DeCSS. Where's yours?

      --

      censorship is a form of noise, which actively seeks to drown out content with silence - Crash Culligan
    10. Re:Meals Ready to Wear? (hehe) by Python · · Score: 2
      Well, at least you didn't gross people out with the recipie for the chocolate "field pudding" from the hot chocolate mix, creamer, sugar, and water.....

      YUMMMMMMMMMMMMM.... Ranger pudding.... aaaaaaahhhhhhh..... (drools...)

      I lived off that stuff.

      Former 11B3G and 11A(G). (Infantry: Enlisted and Officer, Ranger.)
      --
      Python

      --

      Python

  4. Woohoo! by Rix · · Score: 1

    I keep forgetting to eat when I pull all night coding sessions.
    Cheers,

    Rick Kirkland

  5. Not good enough.. by technos · · Score: 2

    'An Army moves on its stomach'.. Even thought the soldier may not be on the verge of death due to starvation, you can sure as all hell bet they are not going to 'play' their best on a rumbling, week-empty stomach. Then again, MRE's are never filling enough, and you have to endure the flavour (or in some cases, the complete lack of it). With the MRE-in-a-patch, at least you don't have to taste it. That ought to raise morale...

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
    1. Re:Not good enough.. by technos · · Score: 2

      I did read. I just don't believe that anything can be developed without significant side effect over the course of the two day planned use period. (Look at the current offerings. They're basically the same as forty years ago!) The rest of the article was believable, even the time-release microchip and the nutrient delivery system.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  6. Nutrient needs by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 1
    I remember reading that your necessary vitamin intake for a day would fit within a kernel of rice. Can that be true?

    If so, then why do i need a Boston Creme donut everymorning to take care of me in the morning?
    Be thankful you are not my student. You would not get a high grade for such a design :-)

    1. Re:Nutrient needs by h2odragon · · Score: 1

      I think I read that too; why then are all the OTC vitamin supplements these monster horse pills that Linda Lovelace would gag on?

  7. Geeks Need Some by Foxxz · · Score: 1
    I can see alot of geeks using these so they dont have to get up to eat.. plaster our bodie with them.. now if we only had a patch to help with that bathroom problem...

    -Foxxz

  8. nope by akamil · · Score: 3

    Personally, I don't think this will work that well. While the soldier may get enough nutrition from the patches, he'll get really hungry. The amount of nutrition a person gets has nothing to do with how hungry they get, which is determined by the amount of substance that's inside the person's stomach. It could work, however, if coupled with something, anything to eat.

    1. Re:nope by reflector · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't think this will work that well. While the soldier may get enough nutrition from the patches, he'll get really hungry. The amount of nutrition a person gets has nothing to do with how hungry they get, which is determined by the amount of substance that's inside the person's stomach. It could work, however, if coupled with something, anything to eat.

      Being a soldier means hanging tough and getting the job done. No, it might not be comfortable being hungry, but whether a soldier is comfortable or not isn't the issue. If the nutrition in the patch can keep the soldier on his toes instead of weak and weary, that's all that matters.

      When you're standing knee-deep in mud with flies buzzing around the corpses all around you, staying alive is all that matters. Man, don't even get me started about the 'nam.

  9. Hey! No Fair! by randombit · · Score: 2

    These bars - which have mocha chocolate flavoring with almond butter, almond pieces, currants and vegetable oil - contain a total of 600 milligrams of caffeine, the equivalent of about six cups of coffee.

    Were can I get some of these?!?! :P

    Seriously, this sound pretty cool. I think you'd still feel hungry (as the body isn't adapted to taking food through the skin and the stomach just knows that it's empty), but it's a damn good idea. I wonder how it will get along in the general civilian market. Well, I guess I'll still be around in 2025 (though I will be an old fart [note that I consider anyone over 40 an old fart, nothing personal anyone :P]), too see the new fashion craze kick in - don't eat any food, subsist entirely on food patches. :)

    1. Re:Hey! No Fair! by AntiNorm · · Score: 5

      600 milligrams of caffeine

      That is equivalent to three bottles of Jolt. What are they trying to do, make them all go on "I am Cornholio, I need TP for my bunghole"-type rampages?


      =================================

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    2. Re:Hey! No Fair! by Python · · Score: 2
      Heh... no, just stay awake. Sometimes you have to go for days without sleep to make mission, and this process can repeat itself over weeks - so you get extremely strung out and tired alot in most combat units. I can remember many times having been awake so long, that on night missions my mind didn't understand that my eyes were open, and just decided to start dreaming. Thats always fun... an eyes open fully tactile dream. Obviously, you want to prevent this - hence the need for LOTS of caffeine.

      I've literally eaten the coffee grounds from my MREs on the spot to keep me awake. After awhile, I started carrying all sorts of legal stimulants to keep me awake as do alot of folks. Since its obviously needed without the rigors of the modern battlefield, someone finally clued into the fact that the military should issue it. The one thing the military is not known for is letting people get enough sleep. There is never enough time to sleep, so something like this is worth the trade off to many higher ups (and its NEEDED anyway). Mission first, sleep never. ;-)
      --
      Python

      --

      Python

  10. Yes, kind of by Rix · · Score: 2

    Your vitamin intake would be very small, but calories and carbs would take up more space.
    Cheers,

    Rick Kirkland

  11. Not everone needs the same Vitamins, food, etc... by sdriver · · Score: 2

    Acording to this article on CNN researchers say everyone has differnent needs. In fact, Vitamins alone are not enough for keeping healthy but may cause problems. Especially if under stress.

  12. Otherwise know as... by toofast · · Score: 1

    How to render a human less human, and more dependant on machines. Maybe by 2025 the movie The Matrix will not be in the Sci-Fi category anymore, it'll be a Drama or a Real-Life Story...

  13. I'm wondering ... by Lars+Rindsig · · Score: 2

    from the now-if-only-I-didn't-need-to-stand-to-pea dept.

    How dows one pea? Is it also possible to, say, corn or cucumber?

    1. Re:I'm wondering ... by nyet · · Score: 2

      All he is saying is give peas a chance.

    2. Re:I'm wondering ... by fader · · Score: 1

      Yes... if only everyone would work for whirled peas...

      --
      - fader
  14. cure for obesity?? by fluxrad · · Score: 3

    just read a post and thought of something i found rather interesting. If you could, in fact, get all the nutrition you needed through a patch (basically) - then this could quite possibly become a cure for obesity. Rather than telling people "watch what you eat." - just tell 'em "don't eat at all." There would obviously be no reaon to eat, and of course your calories would be "naturally" rationed so to speak.

    That would seem to me to be a pretty reasonable way to lose weight. Thoughts, comments?

    My only other concern would be - do you think the U.S. army would use this as an excuse to over-exert their troops? The act of eating can not just be taken as simply getting food. It also helps comradery, fatigue, and that nagging' desire for little debby snack cakes. I doubt this would happen but it is certainly a possibility.


    FluX

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
    1. Re:cure for obesity?? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting suggestion, but it's hard to say where things would be by the time the patch is developed (around 2025 according to the article). I can't imagine that these patches would be available for the civilian population immediately -- but even if they were, the cost would likely be prohibitive. Who knows? "It is never meant to replace a turkey dinner with all the fixings." which probably means that one could not *subsist* on these patches alone. Perhaps a mix of using the patch with a proper diet could be an effective solution?


      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    2. Re:cure for obesity?? by vectro · · Score: 1

      Better to be over-exerted and alive than rested and shot.

    3. Re:cure for obesity?? by djrogers · · Score: 3

      The majority of overweight people in America don't overeat because they're hungry, they overeat for emotional reaons (enjoyment, 'social eating', or the hundreds of shades of depression). Eliminating the hunger is something we have been able to do for years, and it has not proven effective at all. Taken another way, if it were only the hunger, diet food would work better than it does. Telling one to avoid food altogether would be counter productive.

      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    4. Re:cure for obesity?? by donutello · · Score: 1

      In most people, obesity is caused mainly by a craving/desire to eat beyond what your body needs. You can feed people the patch but they'll still want to eat! If they could control their desire to eat then, they can control their desire to eat now.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    5. Re:cure for obesity?? by RobinH · · Score: 1

      That would be so cool! I imagine they would hook up these microchips to some kind of 'bluetooth'-like wireless network... and that means we could tap in, right? - perhaps add a few pounds to one guy, and give your cute date a little caffeine... oh man, this could be fun!

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    6. Re:cure for obesity?? by sandler · · Score: 1
      The act of eating can not just be taken as simply getting food.

      I agree. Work would be much less bearable without a lunch break. And it would be a shame for "family dinner time" to be replaced by slapping a patch on the kids and watching TV.

  15. The perfect food already exists by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 2

    The perfect food that provides all the physical and emotional nourishment that a person needs is already available. It is called a Lil' Debbie Nutty Bar.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    1. Re:The perfect food already exists by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      I am sorry that I posted this post earlier without throughly researching it. The actual best foods are...

      3. Twix dipped in Mac'n'Cheese

      2. Lil Debbie Nutty Bars

      1. HOT GRITTSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  16. Will it run Linux, or NetBSD by cide1 · · Score: 1

    I can only guess, Linux or NetBSD.

    Laugh, it's a joke

    --
    -- the computer doesn't want any beer, no matter how much you think it does. NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer.
  17. What we really need is... by HP+LoveJet · · Score: 5

    ...coprophagic colorectal nanosites! Woohoo! Bet there won't be a lot of people lining up to beta-test that one.

    --
    spawn_of_yog_sothoth
  18. Re:Not good enough..??? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    What!? MRE's not filling enough? I am a pretty big guy and I like to eat, but MRE's were always MORE than enough. In fact when I was in the field I could only get down two a day.

    Weird.

  19. What about tampering? by AndyLong · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be easier to tamper with a large amount of patches, than a large amount of MRE's? I could see a bad batch of these patches hurting more people than a bad batch of other food sources. I also think it would be easier to add other goodies to a patch. Mind altering drugs to make troops more responsive? *throws 2 pennies in the jar*

  20. Combat Soldiers Don't Need To Eat by jeremyf · · Score: 1
    Goodie, soldiers in combat eating only wastes time killing! Better yet, we can get rid of their blood and replace it with a highly-flammable gunpowder solution, and we can just launch them at the enemy with a giant cannon. That way we can make sure they feel no pleasure at all and have the most efficient combat possible.

    - Jeremy Fuller

    1. Re:Combat Soldiers Don't Need To Eat by jeremyf · · Score: 1
      What?!?! I'm not a troll imitator, I was making a metaphor about the article and how mechanically it treats its soldiers. It's no accident that these patches are being researched for/introduced to the military first, and not any other part of society.

      - Jeremy Fuller

  21. Guess what... by Tossed+Salad+Man! · · Score: 1

    ...they're almost as nutritious and wholesome as a... TOSSED SALAD!
    --

    --
    Trollin' fer syrup!
    1. Re:Guess what... by Kilzall · · Score: 1

      Do not hide behind the mask of an AC! Come out into the light and tell me to my face that I'm not funny and help me to be a hilarious bringer of levity like yourself. If you do not I shall continue to believe that I am the funniest person on earth!

      BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
      --

      --
      Win98 sux without these 1337 toolz !!
    2. Re:Guess what... by Tossed+Salad+Man! · · Score: 1

      Silly people cannot judge funny from not funny. I bet you laughed, even if it was a laugh of pity.
      --

      --
      Trollin' fer syrup!
  22. Penguin Patches? by Morbid+Curiosity · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. Military, "Penguin Patches".... any chance I can see the CVS tree for a Lieutenant Colonel?

  23. We know the effect of a Boewulf Cluster of these.. by Lord_Sloth · · Score: 1

    ...obesity

    --
    You are not me, therefore you are not important
  24. Anyone else bothered by this? by MichaelH · · Score: 1
    Also possible would be the infusion of "neutraceuticals" - chemicals that would trick a soldier's brain into thinking his stomach is full or that his muscles aren't really tired.

    Neat. I wonder what else you could trick soldiers' brains into thinking? We could get rid of all sorts of pesky "human factors".
    ------------
    Michael Hall
    mphall@cstone.nospam.net

    --

    Michael Hall
    mph.puddingbowl.org

  25. Why vitamins? by ContinuousPark · · Score: 3

    transfers vitamins to your body transdermally

    I think you can stop eating vitamins for several days without suffering from any physical problem or performance insufficiency. The thing that you can't live without ingesting on a daily basis are carbohydrates and proteins, right? So, if these patches are meant to be used for one or two days, you wouldn't need to supply vitamins. (I'm no nutriologist, so correct me if I'm wrong).

    The article also says that they're experimenting with some sort of patches that will give you the illusion that your stomach is full or your muscles aren't tired, but doesn't everyone with the right amount of motivation has sometime been able to stay 24 or 36 hours without eating or sleeping. And it seems to me that being in a combat situation would make you produce enough adrenaline to stop worrying about you not having a meal yet.

    Finally, what about water?? That you gotta have!! Lost of it, everyday, what's the solution for that?? If you don't have access to food or cannot waste time eating you still have to carry water with you or is there gonna be a patch fot this too? Strikes me as unlikely.

    --


    "All the things one has forgotten scream for help in dreams". Elias Canetti
    1. Re:Why vitamins? by pq · · Score: 2
      > Finally, what about water?? That you gotta have!!

      Yeah, you can get that dehydrated, like in the famous Y2K survival kits... just add water and its ready in seconds!

      --
      "I will take the Ring," he said, "though I do not know the way."
    2. Re:Why vitamins? by knitephall · · Score: 2
      Finally, what about water?? That you gotta have!!

      Yes, you would still have to bring water with you. However, getting water is generally quicker than preparing a meal (even army rations) as all you have to do is open your canteen and tip your head back. Also, the less you have to carry with you (and thus the lighter your pack), the more efficient you will be. Sometimes it's the little things that determine whether you live or die.

      --

      Visualize whirled peas.
    3. Re:Why vitamins? by laborit · · Score: 3

      It's true that a normal, healthy individual who's been getting the RDA of vitamins can go without for a few days and show no signs of deficiency. However, there are many things about wartime that are abnormal and unhealthy. Overexertion, fatigue, and psychological stress play hell with the B-vitamins, which are important for proper energy metabolism. Maintaining a steady, high plasma level of B-complex may improve performance, and will certainly help prevent soldiers from collapsing or falling ill following their ordeal. Vitamin C usage also increases under high stress, and ensuring an adequate intake is valuable in preventing toxic metabolic byproducts from causing ogran damage, cancer, and such.

      This is probably less significant in the case of fat-soluble vitamins like A, D, and E, since they're stored in adipose tissue and doled out slowly. But B and C are water-soluble, and are constantly being excreted. A transdermal patch is probably superior to getting them from food or pills.

      Another possibility for this technology is infusion of essential amino acids. These are required in gram quantities to enable the repair and growth of muscle tissue. Given the kind of beating muscle takes during long marches and heavy exertion, a lot of sprains and tears (and the associated loss of active time) could be prevented if we made sure that maintenance abilities were optimal.

      So yes, you can get along without vitamins daily -- but the tradeoffs aren't always desirable.

      - Michael Cohn
      "Take a man out of a pestilential jungle where people he doesn't know are trying to kill him for reasons he doesn't understand and surprise! His need to shoot smack goes away." - Dan Baum, _Smoke and Mirrors_

      The bad do bad because the bad is rewarded. The good do good because the good is rewarded.

      --

      -----
      Go ahead, blame me... I voted for Nader!
  26. It scares me that this could work. by tcd004 · · Score: 3
    All you'd need is a drug that would act as an appetite suppressant.

    It scares me becasue soldiers are taught to be something other than human during wartime, and the military encourages them to shed any emotion and replace it with dicipline.

    If you take away the fundamental psychological and social funciton of eating, you've got troops who are even less human.

    I don't like it.

    tcd004

    1. Re:It scares me that this could work. by fmoody · · Score: 1

      Geez, can we get a little more exaggeration please?

      Man's inhumanity to man isn't anything the military has to instill in people, its something they usually have to work on controlling in people... A cohesive unit is NOT, I repeat, NOT a mob. It is a collection of people relying on each other and working together towards a common goal. Yes, they can't take a break to have a good cry... Mostly because a soldier who is dead is no good, and often harmful, to the rest of his unit.

      Wartime is filled with times where you are on the move (read: run) with no time to sleep, much less have a lovely turkey dinner. These patches could keep the men alive and healthy. A good thing, most of us will agree. That being said, is there a potential for misuse? Sure... But then again, I think that all those guns, explosives, etc could be misused also..

    2. Re:It scares me that this could work. by Python · · Score: 2
      Yeah... we wouldn't want to do anything that would make that fighting force effective or anything. Lets just make it fun and let people do whatever they want in the military! To hell with following orders or doing any of that corrupt military "stuff". Lets hang out and talk the enemy out of killing us.

      Bah... such nonsense. You don't know how lucky you are to have people with common sense running the military. Its all fine and dandy to talk about how great it would be if the military weren't so... we'll militaristic, but then the military wouldn't be able to fight wars and do the things we pay them to do now would they?

      Use your head here. War is about closing with the enemy and destroying him (or her) thru shock force, fire and maneuver. All of that requires absolute and complete order and discipline, and you don't get that with some cool, democratic mob.
      --
      Python

      --

      Python

  27. Penguin Mints by sirinek · · Score: 1
    Instead of the link the poster put to some site selling penguin mints, how about posting the actual site for penguin mints?? That site would be www.peppermints.com

    sirinek

  28. In 2025... by Teman+Clark-Lindh · · Score: 1

    Humankind will live on the moon, and robots will clean our houses! Computers will furfill our every desire in virtual worlds! Cats will be able to talk! Slashdot will have mirrors for the sites it links to! It'll be AMAZING!

    --
    There's no mystical energy field that controls my destiny. It's all a lot of simple tricks and nonsense.
  29. Now if they could only do that for sleep... by Greyfox · · Score: 4

    I waste 3 or 4 hours a night sleeping! I'd much rather be hacking the kernel source during those hours.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Now if they could only do that for sleep... by Roblimo · · Score: 4

      The Army used to hand out amphetamines like mad.

      They'd keep you going for a couple of days without sleep. The speed made you a little jumpy, of course, but that wasn't really a handicap under the circumstances...

      - Robin

    2. Re:Now if they could only do that for sleep... by Mai+Longdong · · Score: 1

      "The Vietnamese population has some strong opinions on this issue."

      Nguyen Phuck'em.

  30. Now you can get liprings that go thru both lips! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For that whacked segment of society that has to have everything pierced. Since you don't have to eat, seal that mouth shut and be stylish too!

  31. that's by 2025 by Frac · · Score: 2
    by 2040, we'll see bionic chips implanted all over supermodels when they do the walk in their Victoria Secret lingeries.

    by 2050, nutritional patches will be the new fad for girls trying to lose weight.

    by 2060, dilberito finally goes out of business. Scott Adams doesnt' really care, because he's having too much fun inside the holodeck.

  32. anything would be better than MREs ... by mr_death · · Score: 1
    ... as we used to say, "Meals, Ready to Eat -- 3 lies in one sentence."

    --
    It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
  33. Re:Not good enough..??? by technos · · Score: 2

    I must be abnormal.. When I camp, I'll down four, mabye five in a day and not be happy.. Plus the odd extra chocolate bar, etc.

    Versus two normal meals and a light breakfast at home..

    I have an odd craving for barbacue pork all of a sudden..

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  34. Well... by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    You probably could include some drug(s) in the patch to prevent that, too. Ah, the miracle of science...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Well... by logicnazi · · Score: 1

      Yes, as they said in the article

      --

      If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

  35. Hmm. What about everything else? by vmxeo · · Score: 1

    That's an interesting idea and all, but what about other basic nutrients? Correct me if I'm wrong, but your body still needs bulk sugars, carbohydrates, and protein, and caffiene... (ok, maybe not the protein...)

  36. Nice to know... by thesenator · · Score: 1

    ...that in 25 years there will be patches i can eat from.

  37. This would work pretty well by Dacta · · Score: 4

    (I'm not a nutritionist, but I have done the odd long distance sports event, and I know a little about this.)

    Already, people involved in extreme athletic events (things like RAAM - the non-stop bicycle race across America) use a totally liquid diet for up to two weeks at a time. One of the main reasons for this is because solid foods are much harder to digest, and for events like these you really, really want to know exactly what is going into your body.

    They do use vitamn suplements, though.

    In things like the Tour de France they use daily blood testing to see what food you should eat, and it isn't too far fetched to be able to make an educated guess on your nutrition needs from your sweat secretions, using current technology.

    Before everyone says "But you'll feel hungry because your stomach will be emtpy" - not true! You'll feel hungry for a while, but liquids and foods with a lot of bulk but low calories (eg, plain salads) will compensate for that, and your stomach will contract.

    After a couple of weeks your stomach will feel fine, and a liquid diet, plus these nutrition patches would work really well. You'd still need the liquid for hydration, though.

    I'd say 2025 might be pessimistic - at least for the first versions of something like this.

  38. Re:Subdermal food? Implanted PCs? IP over neurons? by AntiNorm · · Score: 1

    Woo hoo! Sign me up! I wanna be the first living brain with an IP address (I wonder if IPv6 has enough addresses). Just pleeeeeease don't slashdot my brain!

    Networked brains?
    Two words: Beowulf cluster.


    =================================

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  39. Cool idea, but... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2


    Isn't it just a little bit early to be celebrating? Especially considering that this patch won't do *US* any good at all.

    Assuming that this patch is made available to civillians in 2025, at the same time as it becomes available to the military; the only programmers that'll benefit from it are the ones just getting around to being *born* right now.

    Twenty-five years from now, we'll all be over the hill and obsolete. Unless of course there's a Y2K-esque emergency that'll bring us C/C++/Java/Perl guys in from the pasture; like Y2K itself did for the COBOL and Fortran geezers. Other than that, it'll be no use whatsoever for those of us programming NOW.... oh well.

    Depressing? Yeah, a little. But that's the nature of our game.

    It might help our kids do those all-nighter programming sessions tho. That's definately something.

    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  40. Yummy.... by CmdrNacho · · Score: 1

    Overheard in an army mess tent in 2025... "Excuse me, are you going to finish that Nutrition Patch?"

  41. College Use by ucsimon · · Score: 1

    mmmmmmmm.....so much caffiene. I think these would become huge on the college black market scene / bigger than even freakin' mp3's. imagine party, i mean study for days on end....sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet.

    -dennis the kid

  42. I like MREs! by timothy · · Score: 2

    Which may make me part of the lowest low brow culinary culture, but I'm serious.

    They're a really interesting engineering project. I'm talking about the ones that you heat with a galvanic reaction (am I thinking straight?) ... the food is actually surprizingly good. I'd like to know where I can get some MREs to keep in my car, actually, in case I suffer a breakdown and have to wait a while for help. (Which has happened to me, and I was very glad to have the emergency car food along.)

    The peaches and other fruit are good, so are the cookies. The crackers are ... well, crackers. The chocobars are tasty, though no competition for the Lindt family of Switzerland. The fruit punch is bland, at least in the recommended concentration, but it's just like Kool-Aid: the recommendation is a joke played on you by the guy who designs the packages, and is to be ignored as a matter of course.

    However, there's no excuse for any creamy dishes in MREs -- those are pretty foul. Chicken Ala King? barf. Chile? Turkey? They're goood! Please, if you don't like MREs, send me your extras:)

    Of course, I am rarely tapped to work on the Michelen guides ...

    timothy

    p.s. The little tobasco bottles are cool, too!

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:I like MREs! by Teferi · · Score: 2

      I'd like to know where I can get some MREs to keep in my car, actually, in case I suffer a breakdown and have to wait a while for help.

      I remember seeing MREs for sale at what appeared to be a military surplus store in New York...they were pretty cheap, and I almost bought one or two. Just saying that they _can_ be found.


      "If ignorance is bliss, may I never be happy.

      --
      -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
    2. Re:I like MREs! by Animats · · Score: 2
      I'd like to know where I can get some MREs...

      The Wornick Company, which makes military MREs, will happily sell you MREs in bulk. Smaller quantities can be purchased from survival and camping suppliers. Check out Y2Kdinners.com, which apparently overbought. The going rate is about $60 for a case of 12 meals, so they're not super-cheap. Each case contains two of each of the six standard meals. It's not a bad idea to have a few cases around, in case of storms, power outages, earthquakes, etc.

      Incidentally, drink a LOT of water with MREs; they're not dehydrated food, but they're highly concentrated.

    3. Re:I like MREs! by chaobell · · Score: 1

      Yeah, call me weird, but for the most part I loved 'em. I could not hang with the Spam slice (this one led to a lot of amusing impromptu Monty Python sketches in the tent/shop in Bahrain) or the omelet or anything a la king, but I liked the pork 'n rice 'n BBQ sauce, and the meatballs and rice (I think it was meatballs and rice).

      And were we the only ones that had social castes based on what condiment came in the package for your crackers? The people who got the apple jelly were lower than dirt. Grape jelly was little better. Peanut butter was middle-class. And if you got the cheese spread, you were hot stuff.

      I actually liked that "cookie bar"...you know, the one that looks like something you'd give a gerbil to gnaw on...

      And most army surplus stores do get them. I was waxing nostalgic a while back and grabbed one. One more tiny Tabasco bottle for the shelf. ^_^

      --
      This is a Chao. A Chao says "Mu."
    4. Re:I like MREs! by zenray · · Score: 1

      Correction, The Wornick Company cannot sell MREs to the public. Federal law stops this. We will sell you a civilan equivalent, MIL-SPEC. Just as good as MREs.... Visit our newly designed web site for details - disclaimer, I had nothing to do with the design of the current web sight. Any MRE sold to the public comes at the very end of shelf life as surpuls items or as stolen stuff via the black market.

      --
      zenray
  43. Revised summary by Vorro · · Score: 2

    "Thanks to the U.S. Dept. of Defense, nutritional patches may be available by 2025 for a slashdotter in cyberspace who (does not have access to / cannot waste time eating / is too damn lazy to get up and eat / has forgotten what comprises) a traditional meal as we know it today.

    There. It's fixed now.

    Zack 'Vorro' Adgie
    ---------------------------
    A wise man speaks because he has something to say.
    A foolish man speaks because he has to say something.

    --
    ____________________________
    What did the Buddhist say to the hot dog vendor?

    "Make me one with everything."

  44. Pretty freakish. by Satsuki+Yatoji · · Score: 2

    Very scary if you think about it. Just don't let Microsoft have any place in the making or it'll start creating strychnine by accident when it crashes....Instead of the Blue Screen of Death, it'll be the Blue-Cyanotic Face of Death.

    --

    -You're wearing...A bag? I have misplaced my pants.
  45. It's The Matrix! by Syn.Terra · · Score: 2

    From the article:

    Also possible would be the infusion of "neutraceuticals" -- chemicals that would trick a soldier's brain into thinking his stomach is full or that his muscles aren't really tired.

    Just like Neo thought he was in reality, but he really was in a big plastic egg filled with goo with a wire sticking out of his head.

    And why stop here? If we can trick our muscles into thinking they aren't tired, why not trick your heart into always beating, even if you have high cholesterol? There goes Viagra...

    And think of what these patches can do for people with low self-confidence! You can just wear a ConfidencePatch, and always feel like everyone digs you.

    Good to see the military will have perfected mindfucking by 2025.


    ------------
    --
    "Okay, who taught the cat how to type ctrl alt delete?"
  46. endometriosis by misterklaw · · Score: 1

    uh... endometriosis is not a digestive problem (hopefully).

  47. 3rd world ? by Bert+Peers · · Score: 5

    Interesting to see that this new technology is brought up in a context of battlefields and soldiers, and nobody seems to care, either. Am I the only one who thinks this could be pretty interesting for the starving population of the 3rd world ? Sounds similar to the invention of powder-milk, but even better : a single plane can carry 'food' for literally hundreds of thousands of people, the expiring date is practically 'forever', it's easy to administer, and requires no extra resources (like the milk which requires water). Technology actually helping people ! No ?

    1. Re:3rd world ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it'd increase their dependance on the industrial world. I think it'd be far better to get 'em growing their own food.

    2. Re:3rd world ? by yuriwho · · Score: 2

      Sorry but this is no solution to hunger or nourishment. It is a method to deliver small amounts of vitamins, hormones and other regulatory substances into the body (at an outrageous price). For the starving person nothing, short of food will help in the long run.

      The bottom line is delivering caloric intake and this as yet hypothetical delivery device cannot possibly deliver calories unless it weighed 10 pounds, covered a substantial portion of your body and was changed every couple of days.

      Powdered milk however is usefull in this regard.

      --
      no sig.
    3. Re:3rd world ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, in the long run, this would not help anybody. Third world countries would increase their population and dependence on the first world. Eventually, their would be a mass famine when the first world decides it cannot support the rapidly growing population. Additionally, the increased population will further degrade the Earth's resources.

      Six billion people is already a lot people. We need to focus on birth control before feeding starving people. Feeding starving people without looking into birth control is dangerous, because it will cause greater starvation in the future. In this respect, it is selfish to feed the starving, because we are postponing solving the real problem. This leaves the generations ahead of us to deal with an even greater problem.

      The only long term way to stop starvation is to curb population growth. A better solution to eliminate world hunger would be to have a birth control patch.

    4. Re:3rd world ? by Lowther · · Score: 2

      Powdered Milk - a brilliant invention for supporting the Third World.

      Instead of encouraging the feeding of babies on their mother's milk, which is by far the best food for them, at least one company encouraged the use of powdered baby milk amongst Third World mothers. This crap was purchased by those who swallowed the slick hype, and mixed with the local, unclean water supply. It spread disease and death amongst the babies.

      I'll not mention the name of the company, but they are a well known very large conglomerate, and I don't eat their chocolate any more.

      --
      Stephen Hawking has written another book. It's about time as well.
    5. Re:3rd world ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'll not mention the name of the company,

      Why on earth not?
      It was Nestle.

      NESTLE! NESTLE!

    6. Re:3rd world ? by TicTacTux · · Score: 1
      So we'd better ameliorate that poor soil and other averse conditions. (Or develop plants that can grow there). But nooo, it seems far more promising to get yet-another-hand-in-their-pocket to grab their money.
      We still haven't got rid of our colonialist attitude. We still ship medicine at exorbitant prices over there to cure the wounds made by weapons we sold them before.

      Unless we start seeing all as peers vs. 'the poor sods who need our parental help' things will never really change.

      --
      Use The Source, Luke!
    7. Re:3rd world ? by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Powdered milk however is usefull in this regard.

      Whether or not that's true, powdered milk can be lethal, and, because of poor water supplies and poor education, is a leading cause of death for babies and infants in poor countries. Moreover, lactose intolerance affects a large proportion of the world's population. See:

      http://www.gn.apc.org/babymilk/

      and find out just how evil Nestle et al really are. Boycott Nestle!

    8. Re:3rd world ? by hey! · · Score: 3

      Feeding starving people without looking into birth control is dangerous, because it will cause greater starvation in the future.

      As Lisa pointed out, affluence reduces fertility. To be more precise, reducing infant and child mortality means people can have fewer births to ensure an adequate supply of children to work the farm, family business, carry on the family name, and all the other things people need children for.

      In fact, I think you have it backwards. Government sponsored birth control programs are doomed to failure unless they address improvement in the material conditions of the people. Improving the status of women along with this is also very helpful (i.e. if a woman has a choice, she's not going to let herself be used as a baby factory).

      Additionally, the increased population will further degrade the Earth's resources

      Of course resources are limited and wants are unlimited, but a first world person hardly has any right to criticize some piss-poor third world subsitence farmer for having a few too many kids. Take a look at what you throw out in the trash every week -- then multiply it by six (because of all the trash generated to produce the goods you turned into trash is 5x what you end up throwing out). That is the amount of virgin environmental matter you turned into waste. That probably represents years of consumption for the subsitence farmer, who makes use of everythign efficiently.

      If you wanted to make a dent in the use of global resources, why not a BTU tax which increases gas prices to five bucks a gallon. What -- howls of protest? So you're going to tell the rest of the world to stop having babies?

      Technology and affluence can have a positive effect on the environment. Clearly population has a detrimental effect, but it has to be balanced against the available technology.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:3rd world ? by tracktwo · · Score: 1

      I forget where I read this, but I also seem to recall hearing that the boxes of powdered milk had a nice picture of a little white baby on the side. Since the people these supplies go to don't speak english, the suppliers often put pictures of the contents on the box so people know what they're getting. Hrmm..

    10. Re:3rd world ? by tracktwo · · Score: 2
      Then people in villages/towns can stop working to feed themselves, choking on smoke from cooking fires, collecting water from pumps, etc. and get jobs that support higher living conditions. They will have better health conditions, so they don't need to have big families to look after them when they get older. Women will be educated and can make their own choices about how many children they bear.

      I wish I paid better attention in high school global history, but here goes..

      IIRC, birth rates in developing countries go in 3 stages. Poor countries have a high birth rate but also a high death rate, the birth rate is required to keep the population up and parents needed lots of kids to ensure someone would survive to take care of them when they got old. As these nations develop, the death rate drops -- but the birth rate stays stable. This causes problems with overpopulation and a shortening of resources. After this the birth rate drops down to a lower level, and remains there (if all goes well), similar to what it is now in developed countries.

      The problem is, education is critical at stage 2, otherwise these countries have a nasty tendancy to drop back to stage 1, instead of moving on to stage 3. This is also the most expensive period (large population, expected to actually grow old) and these countries can't rely solely on foreign aid, and even if they can, it doesn't always last long enough to push them to stage 3.

      At least, that's how I remember it. Combine that with the fact that the leaders of these countries are more interested in using their aid money to buy tanks and statues of themselves than investing in education, food, and birth control. Some of these countries, in an attempt to be reasonable, use this money on infrastructure. The infrastructure is required, but not at that point in the country's development. Education and resource allocation are more importand than roads at this point.

    11. Re:3rd world ? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      This is interesting? This was barely thought out by the poster OR the moderators!

      "The patch would be used to keep the warfighter at optimum performance for a day or two, until he or she has access to a real meal and the time to eat it,"

      Ok? You can't compress food that much. The reason this is brought up in the context of battlefields and soldiers is because it will cost more than regular food and it doesn't do the job of regular food. Note they are comparing it to the 'Hoo-Ha' bar. Fat, sugar, caffeine. I bet by the time this battle patch comes out it will also administer usefull battle drugs as well.

      From what I've seen of 'Starving people' around the world, it's the fault of their goverments using the populace as pawns in their power games.
      They grab as much of the relief food as they can to sell. They would LOVE these combat patches if you decide to use them as relief aid. For their own soldiers or for the black market it would be pretty valuable.

      I don't believe you got a FIVE for your post! Incredible!

      Later
      Erik Z

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    12. Re:3rd world ? by ddraig · · Score: 1

      Environmental concerns are global. Yes, we need to consume much less. Our current economic model encourages consumption and environmental damage.

      Our current model encourages inefficiency in manufacturing and waste recapture, to maximise profitability. If there was a concerted effort to make every stage of the production cycle as efficient as possible, we'd be able to easily support the world at our (first world) standard of living.

      We need to make sacrifices and change our ways, but population growth must also be limited. In order for third world countries to have the option of our standard of living, we need to limit the population.

      Absolutely. So let's help them build the best education system possible, and get girls into schools. Educating women is by far the best way to keep birthrates down, and there are all sorts of useful alternatives to traditional farming methods (both mainstream scientific research and weird stuff) and other technological tools we have which might be useful.

      Just spamming them with food will make them dependent, sure, but if we spam them with useful info they can sort their own shit out.

      And we need to sort our shit out. Don't buy stuff which isn't sustainably produced. If we don't buy it, they won't chop it down or dig it up.

      Unfortunately, it's hard to tell how products are produced, usually. But I have ideas, not solutions :-)

      Some sort of labelling system might be worth a go.

      Ddraig

    13. Re:3rd world ? by Bert+Peers · · Score: 1
      Hum, well, I seem to be slightly misunderstood here :) Ofcourse this patch is much more expensive to produce than "just food", is in a way impractical, makes the 3rd world dependent on 1st world hightech, and is most definitely not a long term solution.

      But that's why it's called a Patch : I was specifically referring to it as a quick fix for particular disasters like the Ethiopia dryness of 1983. As you point out the army wouldn't feed their soldiers permanently on this, it's a one-stop solution for a particular situation. Similarly I thought of these patches as a non-structural quickfix for particularly nasty fuckups of mother nature. One C130 flying over dropping one crate of these sure helps surviving a whole lot more people than a crate of whatever else.

      Hence also the link to milkpowder. I agree that Nestle's vision of powder as a permanent solution is a disaster -- so is this patch. Ok, so nevermind the political implications etc, it's literally a patch. Hope that clears it up ? :)

  48. Forget CVS as we know it. by RAruler · · Score: 2

    Introducing Constant Vitamin Source or CVS for short. Brought to you in part by the Department of Defense, the Linux Nano Community and public support from users like you.

    --

    --
    Insert Witty Sig Here
  49. From the "perhaps in another dimension" department by 311Stylee · · Score: 5

    Hmmm. Sounds interesting but, there are some fundamental flaws in the physiology of the model.

    Electrolytes are important. Without proper numbers of K and Na and P, your nerves wouldn't work to well at all, hence you would have a hard time running, shooting, etc. (also, shouldn't they be working on developing world peace by 2025, not super-soldiers?)

    The other most important performance indicator is the amount of glycogen stored in the muscles. Glycogen is ready-to-go fuel. I forget how much of this a typical person has at any given moment, but after several hours of hard work without refreshment, your blood sugar levels get low, as do glycogen levels, and you (as cyclists say) "bonk", ie. extreme glycogen depletion. You are pretty much useless after that point; severe performance degredation is a phrase that comes to mind.

    Their patch is all well and good if it adresses these most basic issues (the article was rather brief and non-technical) or only one of them, ie. vitamins sorta implies electrolytes. However, the most severly performance limiting factor (as proven by trials in publications like Bicycling Magazine (they don't actually have it available online) is water. Performance has been shown to be affected in as little as an hour of physical activity without hydration. As the body's water content drops, blood gets thicker, resulting in poorer flow and consequently poorer delivery of oxygen and other needed chemicals to the muscles and brain.

    So, in closing, yes, the patch is a good idea (but 25 years?!), but maybe a transdermal hydration system would be a bit of a better considering hydration is quicker to act and hampers performance certainly more than "vitamin" loss and probably more than electrolyte loss. Moreover, electrolytes could be intergrated into any hydration system, ie. gatorade.

  50. Jem Hadar by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

    Why, after reading this article, do I get a mental picture of the Jem Hadar lining up to get their ration of 'the white'?

    --
    MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  51. Great temporary solutions for hunger, etc. by yuriwho · · Score: 4

    A few years ago, researchers discovered a protein hormone called leptin that is critically involved in regulating the response of the brain to hunger in the body. Essentially the fat storage cells in your body (adipose tissue) produce leptin when they are satiated (have enough fat stored), leptin travels to your brain and induces a feeling of satiety, shutting off hunger signals. The drug companies got really excited by this as it first appeared to be the key to controlling obesity. As it turned out very few extremely fat people respond to additional leptin as their problem lies in the responce of the brain cell to leptin, not the lack of the messenger.

    I wonder though, what percentage of normal, soldier types would respond to a quick shot of leptin in not feeling the need to eat for a few days? This could be very useful in war situations where you want to send troops into territories for a few days where you have not set up supply lines yet (can you say covert operations).

    Anyway, I can see this sort of technology being useful in special situations ie. military, athletic events, new product rollouts, yuppie camping, Quake marathons etc.

    But at the end of the day you just gotta EAT!

    --
    no sig.
  52. That's a long time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I can get my nicotine now but have to wait till 2025 to get my vitamins. Something's wrong here.

    (I'm sure that this has been mentioned, but since Andover.Net owns ThinkGeek it seems in really bad taste to link to them instead of directly to the Penguin Mints's actual homepage http://www.peppermints.com/storytime/index.htm.)

  53. Logistics. by FallLine · · Score: 2
    Finally, what about water?? That you gotta have!! Lost of it, everyday, what's the solution for that?? If you don't have access to food or cannot waste time eating you still have to carry water with you or is there gonna be a patch fot this too? Strikes me as unlikely.

    I'm not in the military, but from my limited knowledge of the military the prime difference between food and water is logistics. Water is quite plentifull in most places, and can be made drinkable with the right equipment and experience. Whereas food/rations must be shipped and delivered to the battle scene. In other words, unlike water, you must have ships and/or airplanes deliver food to feed the troops. Logistics such as these are _major_ issues in even modern wars.

    I didn't read the article either, but even if this thing were to only deliver vitamins, I'd imagine that'd free up meal selection substantially. In other words, they could eat all kinds of shit if they had to, and do so more sporadically, which they otherwise could not due to lack of vitamins. In pinch time, if this technology works as claimed, it just might give us an edge.
    1. Re:Logistics. by gvonk · · Score: 1

      Well, now of course you know that because of our government, ANYTHING that is public knowledge cannot give us any edge as far as combat is concerned, if indeed that is what you are talking about. It's only the advancements made secretly that have really helped us... The "bad guy" will just have to get the patches too! There... Done...

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  54. Not eating - No problem by roman_mir · · Score: 3

    For all kinds of reasons I became something of an extreme type of vegeterian about 6 years ago. So I only eat raw (fresh hopefully) vegetables, fruits, nuts, honey. Nothing else. I don't drink when I eat, because it is not necessary with all the liquid in my tomatoes. I don't cook, only wash and cut. I eat once a day at noon, this is mostly due to my crazy lifestyle, work, university, girlfriend, rollerblading, ping pong, swimming, writing some code for myself, homework, work, university, girlfriend, rollerblading, ping pong, swimming, writing some code for myself, homework, work, university..... you get the picture
    I also fast 2-4 times a year for the sake of getting rid of those chemicals, pesticides etc. that are numerous in our foods and air. I only drink distilled water when I fast and nothing else for 3-10 days in a row. I can tell you, that if you are doing this right, you can go on without any food, without feeling hunger, in fact being extra fast and sort of hyper for at least first 5 days of only drinking distilled water (lots of it, which is absolutely necessary to get rid of all toxins) and you don't loose your strength as fast as most of you think. In fact, over time it seems to get easier and easier to do. (with some exceptions, when there is too much stress from exams or the weather is wrong). Human body can go on without food not without liquid for long periods of time and if you do it for short periods of time (less than 40 days) than it can help your overal health.

    1. Re:Not eating - No problem by Byteme · · Score: 1
      The idea of fasting for health purposes is absurd. I know there have been many books on the subject with some of them being recent best sellers. The concept that there is always some amount of fat or red meat in your colon if you do not fast or get an enema is a myth. The same goes for the need to fast on a frequent basis to remove toxins. Fasting may be necessary as a ONE TIME event if they are going from a terrible diet and lifestyle to some sort of change in eating or habitual vice (sugar, caffeine, smoking). The kidney, liver and colon of the human do an excellent job of removing toxins on a daily basis. So if you make the change to vegetarian or vegan a one-time fast or none all at would work fine to eliminate toxins on a regular basis.

  55. Cyborgs by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Well, from a science fiction standpoint this has been predicted for a long time. Conventional science has yet to catch up in thi area although many people are rushing to it. This is another step in that direction, one that sorta bothers me. I don't particularly care for militaries in general, and the though of people who's absolute specialty is war really tweaks my pedal. In 2050 are we going to have genetically engineered soldiers that are raised for the sole purpose of killing other people? Genetic engineering and eating supliments are totally different research areas but they won't be in the future. In 2025 the Army can give a soldier an implant that feeds them, then another to augment his/her perceptions, then another which releases a stimulant to increase muscle strength and dull pain impulses. Then by 2050 the modifications are done on a genetic level rather than a bionic level. What will these factory made soldiers do when there is no war? Will will end up in another decades long cold war because two dogmas don't agree and have the funding to build a super powerful military? How about instead of actually fighting each other, we play a couple rounds of Mortal Kombat and the winner gets a dollar.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  56. A bit more complex than that. by FallLine · · Score: 3

    The majority of Americans overeat, not all of them are overweight, and most don't have any more emotional problems than the average european. Not only do they overeat, but they eat poorly and don't get enough exercise. Put simply, the modern American diet is horrible. Overweight people are frequently the result of simply not being able to get away with this type of eating (e.g., propensity to gain weight)...which prompts inactivity, which prompts depression, which CAN lead eating even more.

    In other words, it is not emotions that make Americans fat, it is our diets. We eat too much sugar, fat, etc. Our meals are high in carbohydrates. The typical American serving size is gigantic by international standards, which naturally prompts increased eating. When is the last time you've been to McDonalds? The supersize value meal soda's are like a gallon soda, a slight exaggeration, but it is truely disgusting, not to mention very unhealthy.

    1. Re:A bit more complex than that. by rhyac · · Score: 1

      Don't knock mcdonalds. mmm.. Bigmac. I hear they're like 10% meal-worm. Good stuff.

    2. Re:A bit more complex than that. by thogard · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure the American diet is worse than the rest of the world. In many parts of the world a high fat diet is considered a good thing. I do suspect it is the inactivity that is the real problem. Inactivity results in being isolated from others which can result in way too many times of emotional problems which can result in eating disorders and a circle of problems.

      I'm an American living in Australia. I don't see very many fat people here at all. I also see hundreds of people walk by my front door every day. There are more McDonalds per person in Oz than anywhere else in the world and unlike the US you can often see women eating in them. Its hard to find low fat foods here and I expect that some of the local diet would kill far more people if their activity levels were anywhere close to that in the US. I've been wondering if the activity level here is related to the fact that the TV is very, very bad.

    3. Re:A bit more complex than that. by fluxrad · · Score: 2

      You put down an excellent point - with a few exceptions. For many americans, driving is not necessarily a choice. It is a necessity. Case in point: My mother works approximately 10 miles from work - this would be a ridiculous walk/jog especially in the Colorado climate we get here in the winter. I myself work about 15-20 miles from home where i am unable to even take public transportation because i work the swing shift. Cities in the states are a prime example of Urban Sprawl - where there really isn't much of a choice in whether or not to take the car. Most people live at least 10 miles or more from their place of employment, and in many cities - public transportation is abismal!

      I think the key to losing weight, at least for americans, is the same as it was 100 years ago: A low fat diet with a generous amount of excercize. Yes, there is no denying that the majority of Americans are very sedentary - that certainly explains why we have such a high degree of obese people. But i do think a "nutrient" patch would certainly help many people. It's been proven that many don't have the same "switch" mechanism in their brain that says "you're not hungry any more" - so they just keep on eating. I think to tell them to have one carrot a day (example only) and a patch could, one day, be a real solution for a real medical problem.


      FluX

      --
      "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  57. late nights by kettch · · Score: 1

    This new technology may have interesting effects in geekdom. Imagine: No more going hours without food so that you can meet your coding deadlines. Getting vital sustenance from a patch could be a boon to late night coders the world over.

    --
    Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
  58. Re:What's Haggis Ladd? by iainh · · Score: 1

    It's a tasty animal
    There are two varieties
    Clockwise and counter clockwise
    The Clockwise variety has shorter legs on its right side
    This helps it run around the Highland hills in a clockwise direction faster.
    The hunting season for the clockwise strain lasts from Feb 31 to Apr 31.
    The hunting season for the counterclockwise strain lasts from Jun 31 to Sept 31.
    The most common hunting method is to put on one stilt
    and run around the hill in the opposite direction carrying a large sack
    It is often helpful to have a bagpipe player with a stilt on the other leg running in the oposite oposite direction

  59. 25 years hence? by jcr · · Score: 1

    This would be post-nanotech, wouldn't it?

    By that time, we could all be running on hydrogen anyway.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  60. The next step by ScottyG · · Score: 1

    Great! Now if only they could engineer a patch that will 'cure' sleep too, I'd be all set!

  61. Why the military won't need these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Remember the recent story on development of exoskeletons for military use. Fitting a real nutritional system (not just vitamin supplements) into one of these would be a small matter, perhaps even a Dune-esq still-suit water recovery system.

    This could/should also be applied to current military vehicles (planes and tanks) to extend operating time & range.

    As someone already pointed out in an earlier post constant feed and hydration systems are being used quite widely and with good results within athletic fields ala camelbak and powergel.
    I'm amazed the military isn't jumping all over this!

    1. Re:Why the military won't need these by Big_All · · Score: 1

      Grrrr, I posted as myself but it came out AC :(

      --
      "Uhmmm this might sound a little paranoid but, I want shielded twistedpair. I figure if I wear a tinfoil hat, my data s
  62. Good! by dragonfly_blue · · Score: 1

    Chewing is hard.

    --
    Free music from Jack Merlot.
  63. Super-caffinated chocolate bars by SaiyajinTrunks · · Score: 1

    Check out the HooAH bars at the bottom of the article!

    "These bars -- which have mocha chocolate flavoring with almond butter, almond pieces, currants and vegetable oil -- contain a total of 600 milligrams of caffeine, the equivalent of about six cups of coffee."
    I'd be ready to hack anything! Who needs sleep?

    --


    "You point your finger at the moon, the fool stares at your finger."
  64. Yeah, but... by Superunknown_GP · · Score: 1
    Don't you miss out on the sheer experience on eating? I mean, after I've spent a night hacking, I like taking the time to nuke some pizza. Gives me some time to think.

    It just seems to me that you lose out on that. I can see using them sometimes, but a lot of the time I just wanna get out of the glow from my CRT for a minute.

    Plus, there's nothing like the taste of cold pizza. I think these would be an occasional boost, not something I'd use everyday.

    It does always depress me to see everyone designing things like this for military applications. If the US spent as much effort on feeding people as it does on ICBMs, we'd probably clear up the problem in a hurry (it is, after all, merely a distribution problem). But, given that all technology is simply tools (and therefore lack ethical value entirely), I suppose this could be used to help feed people- I assume they'd be pretty dense (in terms of nutritional value per cc), so they'd be easy to airlift.

    --
    The above comment is CopyWrong (K) Erisian Entertainment. All Rights Reversed. Ewige Blumenkraft!
  65. Microchip? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1



    According to the story, a microchip on the patch will determine what the body needs, and delivers the necessary nutrients accordingly.

    Well.... unless there is a new way of determining nutrient-needs using the non-invasive method has been developed, I do not see how can a microchip on a patch would "know" what the body needs.

    It can analyse the sweat content, body temperature, heartbeats, blood pressure et cetera, but I do not think we have yet the technology of knowing exactly what the body of a living thing needs by having a microchip-on-a-patch.

    So.... is it possible that a microchip is IMPLANTED inside the soldier's body, and _another_ microchip on the patch communicates with its cousin inside the body and deliver whatever nutrients that have been requested?

    If so, there lies a vulnerability ....

    If every soldiers on the field have implanted microchips in their bodies, and everyone of them carries a nutrient patch with them, then, the easiest way for the enemy to attack is to SABORTAGE the functioning of the microchips, screwing up the nutrient delivery procedures, and causes an inner-body biological upheaval.

    The soldiers then will now have ONE MORE warfront to fight, the one INSIDE their bodies.

    I have the feeling that DoD doesn't really care for the wellbeing of the soldiers. If they have, they wouldn't even want to mess with the soldiers' bodies like that.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  66. HooHA by degauss · · Score: 1

    HooHA is the cheer of the marines..

    stupid journalists.. should do better research


    ---------------

    --


    CoyboyNeal is God
  67. Thats not where this advancement is cool by JayBonci · · Score: 2

    This would make great advancements in medical treatments, and personal care departments.

    First, the patch could be used on civilians to help monitor and balance their daily diet with nutrients that they may not get normally. This would help children develop more completely when young... you know all of that like "a good breakfast..." so on and so forth, well we can make sure it happens with these things.

    This could also be used as a non-invasive mediacal treatment to get people healthy, instead of an IV (cant replace hydration, but not bad for nourishment).

    It always seems that the military comes up with the most innovative and useful things...

    --jay

  68. War is about killing, not making you feel good. by Python · · Score: 2
    You do not want soldiers that hesitate, that are limited by the socializing effects of society. Never forget that war is about one thing: killing. Its not natural for a civilized human being to kill another person, without an obvious threat to themselves. Soldiers have to be trained to do this. They have be de-socialized to kill without hesitation. If you hesitate in combat, you die. Period.

    Soldiers are taught to kill a person solely because they have been labeled the enemy, because the other side will do the very same thing (at a bare minimum). So again, your concern about soldiers being less than human is ill placed. War is about winning, not making you personally comfortable with what soldiers do for a living. What part of "Soldiers kill people for a living" are you having trouble groking?

    Do you want warriors that hesitate to kill and end up being killed themselves, because they need to be "more human"? Or do you want highly disciplined, highly effective killing machines that will execute on the mission we the people given them and then go no further?

    If you want to be conquered, you go with a the former, if you want to win a war, you go with the later and you rely on that discipline to keep those troops in line.
    --
    Python

    --

    Python

    1. Re:War is about killing, not making you feel good. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
      You do not want soldiers that hesitate, that are limited by the socializing effects of society. Never forget that war is about one thing: killing. Its not natural for a civilized human being to kill another person, without an obvious threat to themselves.
      When I contemplete the possibility of being opposed by soldiers - either those of a hypothetical invader, or those of my own nation in some sort of hypothetical revolution - yes, I do want soldiers to have some civilizing restraint.

      When I reflect on the crimes of war perpitated by fighting men of all nations - yes, I do want soldiers to have some civilizing restraint.

      When I realize than the soldiers are going to come home and be civilians again someday - yes, I do want soldiers to have some civilizing restraint.

      When I think that maybe, just maybe, if those who killed other people in war felt bad about it, we might have fewer wars yes, I do want soldiers to have some civilizing restraint.

      Weapons are the tools of violence; all decent men detest them.
      Weapons are the tools of fear;
      a decent man will avoid them
      except in the direst necessity
      and, if compelled, will use them
      only with the utmost restraint.
      Peace is his highest value.
      If the peace has been shattered,
      how can he be content?
      His enemies are not demons,
      but human beings like himself.
      He doesn't wish them personal harm.
      Nor does he rejoice in victory.
      How could he rejoice in victory
      and delight in the slaughter of men?

      He enters a battle gravely,
      with sorrow and with great compassion,
      as if he were attending a funeral.
      --Lao Tzu,Tao Te Ching
      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  69. Wonder if it would work by drix · · Score: 2

    Okay, here's my totally unscientific, probably flat wrong, view on this...

    1. Ever seen those people on 20/20 who are taking like 20000 times the RDA for various vitamins to fend off, among other things, old age, cancer, liver disease, or the plague? Those are always, invariably, the least health, most fucked up people I have ever seen. Their skin is a burnt-piss-yellow color, they have buggy little eyes. Something is wrong here. Some sort of imbalance exists.

    2. I had some bad experiences with beef and became a vegetarian for about a year of my life. I basically stopped growing (I was 16 at the time, right in the middle of puberty - bad idea) because I didn't eat enough protein, even though I drank protein shakes and had plenty of protien supplements, hated beans but ate a little bit anyways, and generally had a pretty all-around balanced diet. I took up meat in a big way after that and gained about 20 lbs.

    I posit that, for whatever reason, taking man-made nutritional supplements just doesn't cut it after awhile. There is something about natural vitamins and carbos and proteins that our body needs. I don't know what it is, but I know it exists. I don't think it would be possible to live on Vitapatches for an extended period even in the best of situations, not to mention humping it through the jungle/desert as a footsoldier all day long.

    --

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    1. Re:Wonder if it would work by yuriwho · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree with you. Nothing beats a regular healthy diet. Remember when we were all told to eat margarine instead of butter? Guess what, margarine is worse for you than butter. Margarine has trans-fatty acids that your body can't deal with. I bet in a few hundred years, health conscious people will be eating relatively low fat all natural diets consisting of all the regular foods of the last few centuries.

      One prediction for the future.....chicken will rule!!!! (as a protein source)

      --
      no sig.
    2. Re:Wonder if it would work by batgirl · · Score: 1

      Drix I agree with you. Let me add my own totally unscientific, possibly wrong-but-it-makes-sense-to-me .02 to what you said -- our bodies are complex systems. So are soils, and plants. Human bodies have evolved to take advantage of the nutrients in plants, which have evolved to take advantage of the minerals etc in soils. It's hard for me to imagine any kind of supplement that could replace the complexity of that. I also stopped eating meat for a long time -- was already kind of anemic when I stopped then wound up in the emergency room after several years of no meat at all. Now I take lots of iron pills every day but they still don't do as much for me when I'm really low as a hamburger does. One last thing: from my current well- (or even over-) fed vantage point, I would rather die than permanently forego chewing, swallowing, tasting and socializing over my meals. Of course, if I were actually starving to death, I would choose otherwise. But food is much more than a nutrient-delivery system, which is another reason I think something like this could/should only be a short-term fix.

    3. Re:Wonder if it would work by drix · · Score: 2

      Yes, I neglected to mention to communal aspect to it. The fact that mankind has congregated to eat since basically we came into existence suggests that there are more than just pragmatic reasons for it. There is something deeply psychological and primal about eating, on the same level as sex or breathing. I'm not sure if messing a tradition hundreds of thousands of years old is that great of an idea.

      --

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  70. Yeah man, more power to open source!! by EvilGwyn · · Score: 1

    Woohoo, this is just what we need, the ability to send in patches via osmosis! I'm sending one in now to mozilla!

    --
    Phear my l33t homepage.
  71. Not eating - Military Problem by Python · · Score: 5
    Human body can go on without food not without liquid for long periods of time...

    True, the difference is that in combat the levels of physical and psychological stress are several orders of magnitude greater than anything you will encounter in your civilian life.

    So, whereas it is certainly possible to survive for very long periods of time without anything but water (you can go maybe 3 days, tops, under heavy stress without water before you get into very serious trouble and will probably die from dehydration, heat stroke and so on), however the combat effectiveness of a unit diminishes as that unit is forced to go without water and food (in that order). In war, combat effectiveness, not bare minimums, is one of the keys to victory. So, unless you absolutely have no choice, feeding the troops is mandatory to suceeding, no matter how much people can "go without".

    There is an old and wise saying in the military, "An army travels on its stomach". When you are buring sometimes upwards of 7000 calories a day (in winter climates, the daily ration is 7000 calories a day for deployments) you can being very cranky and tired if you don't feed those muscles. After a few days of going without, your strength is diminished and your body suffers. And when the body suffers, the mind suffers - and thats a fast path to getting killed.

    So look at it this way, when you have 90 pounds of gear in your ruck, another 20 pounds in combat load, an M-60 (another 25 pounds) slung around your neck, your PASGT pulling on your body and neck, coupled with a heavy mission to knock out - food is not a luxury, its FUEL. Without fuel, you're not going anywhere.

    As part of Ranger school there is alot of starving involved so that you learn first hand what your body can do in extreme circumstances and you learn you can go without food (amongst other things). However, you do not want to operate in combat like that if you do not have to, and thats what these patches are all about. Some missions move too fast to eat, and that does diminish the combat effectiveness of those units. On the other hand, with something like this nutrional patch (if it works), those units will be that much more likely to succeed in their missions - and thats what its all about.

    These patches will do a great job for DRF's, SOG units, Light infantry and other high speed units that have to move fast and may not be able to feed their troops to make mission. Its too bad it will take 25 years before we see it deployed, but it still sounds like a fantastic tool for the War Fighter to have and yet another tool to enhance the combat effectiveness of US fighting forces.
    --
    Python

    --

    Python

    1. Re:Not eating - Military Problem by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

      There is an old and wise saying in the military, "An army travels on its stomach". When you are buring sometimes upwards of 7000 calories a day (in winter climates, the daily ration is 7000 calories a day for deployments) you can being very cranky and tired if you don't feed those muscles.

      This reminds me of an old cold war joke:

      An American general and a Soviet general are bragging about their armies at a summit meeting.

      The Russian says, 'Our great Red Army is the best fed in the world! Every one of our soldiers eats 1000 calories a day'.

      The American replies, 'That's nothing! Our men eat 3000 calories a day!'.

      Stunned, the Russian says "Impossible! There's no way a man can eat a whole sack of potatoes in a single day!"

      (I said it was old, I didn't guarantee it'd be funny ;)


      Your Working Boy,

    2. Re:Not eating - Military Problem by roman_mir · · Score: 2

      Well, here's a hint for you, maybe people were not supposed to burn 7000 calories a day.

  72. More ideas by Dacta · · Score: 3

    (Sorry about replying to myself.. I couldn't find a better place to put it)

    Since the article is talking about combat situations, I think I misinterpreted some of the issues here. What I said above is still correct, but not neccessarily relevent.

    These patches aren't designed for complete nutritional replacement, but for temporary help during crisies.

    Modern Combat situations normally last for maybe 48 hour max - anything more than that and I'd say you have more important thing to worry about than food.

    However, in a combat situation you need your reflexes to be quick, your senses to be accurate and your judgement to be at it's best. All these things are effected by bad nutrition (and lack of sleep).

    Someone in another post mentioned that they expected that adrenelin would keep you alert - not true, and not what you want, anyway. The actual hormonal/chemical adrenelin reaction only lasts for seconds (during the "fight or flight" reflex action), and while this does improve you reflexes and senses (to some degree) it impares your judgement, and leads to a let down afterwards - when you are highly vulnrable.

    Unfortunatly, while it is true that not letting your energy levels (depleated though exercise) get too low will help with these problems, the more severe problem is the lack of sleep. I've read studies that show huge losses in reflex speed after around about 16 hours without sleep, and while this may be delayed in various ways, I don't think you could push it out far beyond the 24 hour barrier without chemical help.....

    I suspect that these "combat patches" may contain a little more that just vitamns. I find that a little scary. Remember those tests with Speed & LSD during Vietnam?

    1. Re:More ideas by RyanShelswell · · Score: 1

      I couldn't find a reference for this, but not long ago I heard the Australian Army was priming soldiers before battle exercises by pumping them full of extra blood. (Their own blood taken out awhile back). Made 'em faster and so on. Haven't some athletes been disqualified for this too?

    2. Re:More ideas by unitron · · Score: 2

      60 minutes did a show years ago about people the CIA dosed with LSD without their knowledge or consent and then left them to wonder why their brains turned to silly putty for no discernable reason.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:More Ideas by Dacta · · Score: 2

      Not sure about the Army thing - I don't think it makes much sense, unless they were working at a high level of exertion (or high altitude, maybe), for a long time.

      It's true abou the athletes, though - and it's very hard to detect, becuase it really is their owne blood. That's one of the reasons (the otehr is EPO abuse) why pro-cyclists get banned for a month of two if their red blood cell count is above a certian level (For "health reasons", but it is really to stop the blood doping)

    4. Re:More ideas by greenrd · · Score: 2
      IIRC, there is relevant evidence obtained under the Freedom of Information Act in the book "Mind Controllers" by Armen Victorian.

    5. Re:More ideas by Wah · · Score: 1

      You can do this pretty easily. The ratio between the effective and fatal dosages for LSD is quite large, something in the area of 1 to 250,000. If you've ever taken it, imagine taking 250,000 hits at once, silly putty for brains indeed. The difference in effective and fatal dosages for alchohol, OTOH, is about 1 to 4. Which is why so many more people die of alchohol poisoning.

      --

      --
      +&x
  73. What about stuff that can't go thru the skin? by Silicon_Knight · · Score: 4

    I'd like to see how someone pumps dietry fiber through that patch. Of course, I've heard that MERs are specially processed so that fibre content is at a minimum (so that the troops won't be caught literally with their pants down...)

    Wonder if HooAh bars are available Military Surplus?

    -=- SiKnight

  74. Re:Not good enough..??? by MattBaggins · · Score: 1

    Heck Yeah...
    I used to eat 4 or 5 of them myself each day. Not good though. Each MRE has supposedly 2000 calories (but I think that includes the boxes and plastic). Funny thing is, that the FDA never approved their use for longer than 2 weeks at a time. Too bad for those of us who lived off of them in the desert. MRE's can be used to make the ultimate coding food though --- the ranger cookie. Mix the coffee, cream and sugar together in one packet. Place on heater for 30 seconds. Presto instant coffee cookie.
    HMMMM ranger cookies, love those things

  75. Behold the mighty MRE by Wee · · Score: 5
    The Wornick Company, which makes military MREs, will happily sell you MREs in bulk

    Those are all foo-foo MREs and bear no resemblence whatsoever to the real thing. I know, they are the real thing now, but that doesn't make them good. The newest Johnny Quest can't hold a candle to the old Johnny Quest the same way these new MREs aren't nearly as good as the old MREs.

    Oh, gone are the days when you could get real MREs. I'm talking Chicken and Rice, Turkey a la King, and the absolute best MRE ever made (if not only because of the incredible -- and I mean truly majestic smelling -- flatulence it provided) Meatballs, Beef and Rice in Spicy Tom Sauce. I lived on Spicy Tom Sauce for a while. I'd eat that breakfast, lunch and dinner if I could. I'd likely get fired, though.

    The worst MRE has to be either the Scrambled Eggs or the Ham Slice (which I've actually seen hungry people refuse to eat, although it was pretty good if you could get your hands on a slice of cheese and then combine it with the MRE bread). I've got a case of 9 year old Ham Slices in my garage. I can't eat them. Anyone wants them, let me know. They're still edible (well, as edible as they ever were), and cheap. Maybe ebay would like them?

    Has anyone tried the new MRE-ish things? Those ones in the white plastic trays? My parents bought a pallet of them (like thousands) wholesale before Y2K and I got my hands on some after the hangover settled. Not bad, but not right. First off, they have that weasely plastic tray instead of a pouch and you can't open them without a knife. The taste isn't right either. That cardboard top is a complete nuisance. And the most important factor: they don't bind you up enough.

    To me, the best thing about MREs was that when you ate one in the morning (I'm serious: if you're in a position to subsist on MRES, you eat them in the morning and you like them in the morning) you didn't have to dump until exactly 12 hours later. Really, you could set you watch to your bowels after three days of MREs. You eat nothing but MREs and you pinch but one hefty pellet a day. It's very handy, and I even bust out an MRE sometimes when I'm feeling less than regular.

    But you can counteract the retaining effects of the main meal packet with the chocolate bar. It's a laxative, and don't let anyone tell you differently. I've eaten the bars alone, and they work extraordinarily well. Too well. I know people say it's a myth, but I'll be happy to prove it to anyone that cares to watch. It only takes about six hours, and I'll buy the beer while you wait. See, I've still got some of those that I haven't eaten.

    Now on to the drink packet. The Lemon flavor is best with liquor (works best with rum or vodka, not so well with Slivovitz or Pernot), the cherry is best for normal drinking. But you only have to mix the packet's contents with half the amount of water the instructions say. Then it's good and not too sticky and you get twice as much. Forget that crap about not mixing in your canteen. Do it anyway -- you don't care.

    The accessory packet is worthless except for the Tabasco and the matches. You can't even blow your nose with that TP. The utensils suck. Throw everything but the sauce and the matches away. Keep the coffee/cocoa if you like that sort of thing (you can eat the coffee raw if you're desperate).

    How to eat a real MRE: Easy, you tear it long ways, not sideways. Ignore those perforations they have near the top. Take your knife and cut the side of the pouch off. Then you can use that same knife to shovel the contents into your mouth. Takes about ten seconds to eat one that way. Using the perforations means you get your hands dirty and it takes forever, even if you get tricky and try to squeeze the stuff out (trust me). Oh yeah, don't forget to put the entire thing of Tabasco into the pouch, no matter what the meal. Eat the whole little bottle. It's important.

    Make sure that you save the main meal pouch for holding trash. And don't bother with heaters. MREs are like revenge: best eaten cold. :-)

    I miss MREs. Maybe I'll go dig one out of the garage now.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Behold the mighty MRE by makohund · · Score: 1

      Plastic trays?! No pouches?! You've got to be kidding me. And I haven't been out all that long, either.

      I actually kinda like the ham slice. And the "omelet". Call me nuts, but I do. :) (You say you want to get rid of them? I'm almost tempted to take you up on that...)

      I can't argue with the MBR for the first choice.
      But above all, my favorite is the incredible rush provided by:

      1. Find the instant coffee, sugar packet, and creamer pouch.
      2. Line them all up together in one hand, and tear the top off of all three at once.
      3. Dump all three in mouth simultaneously.
      4. Wash down with a single gulp of water.
      5. Repeat steps 1-4 for everyone you find who doesn't want the coffee.
      6. Smoke 'em if you got 'em, too.
      7. Try not to explode with new-found "energy".
      8. Try to stay out of trouble. :)

      Helluva way to start the morning!

      DO NOT TRY THIS IF YOU ACTUALLY ANTICIPATE COMBAT, USE OF WEAPONS OR OTHER DANGEROUS EQUIPMENT, OR IF YOU ALREADY HAVE A REPUTATION FOR ANNOYING OTHERS BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW YOU.

      You could get yourself/others killed. Or in the last case, yourself killed/others thrown in the brig.

      Enjoy!

  76. Re:Hey! Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bzzt! It's more like eight bottles of Jolt. See the alt.drugs.caffeine FAQ.
    • Jolt 71.2mg
    • Mountain Dew 55.0mg
    • Coca-Cola 45.6mg
  77. mmmm, Chicken Ala King by Nehemiah+S. · · Score: 2

    When I did my AF survival training exercise in early summer of '97, my team had to traverse ~30 kilometers in 5 days on essentially empty stomachs, through rugged, mountainous terrain, with people hunting us at all times. We were dropped in the deep woods with nothing but a single MRE, an obsolete c-ration, and an empty canteen accessorized by a bottle of nasty water purification tablets.

    Over the course of that week I became very adept at wrenching the carrot-like biscuit root stalks from the ground with a single thrust from my bolt knife; I could fill a coffee can with those bland pseudo-carrots in under five minutes. I also managed to kill and skin an extremely cute white rabbit which we nicknamed Thumper (after the method of his demise), and even ate a few hundred black ants (delicious if you pinch their heads off first). However, despite the 'abundant' natural resources, I believe that few of us would have completed the course without our MREs.

    I dream sometimes about that chicken a la king packet; I managed to save it until the 3rd night, and it was the best meal I've ever had. There was a stamp on the pack of M&M's which I clearly remember stating that they were packaged in 1978. Nineteen year old stew... and I would have killed for another. It was rich, creamy and somehow solid at the same time; even though it was freezing outside, it felt warm on my tongue. I ate it while nestled in a 2 poncho lean-to, between a boulder and a fallen tree, and the other members of my team glared while I sucked the soft essence into my mouth one miniscule drop at a time. I hated teasing them, since they had all long since finished their rations, but it was unavoidable. By the end of the journey I was wishing I had given it away, because some of the weaker members of the team were almost unable to continue. The problem wasn't physiological; they were not injured, or even badly malnourished. Most only lost around five pounds on the trip.

    The problem was in their minds.

    I wasn't affected nearly as badly as other members of my team; I wrestled in college (D-I) and routinely cut between 10 and 25 pounds to make weight, so starvation is a familiar demon. I've seen my skin turn yellow and lost fingernails from dehydration, while being so hungry that my stomach ached at the thought of food; and still had the strength and stamina to defeat some of the toughest people in the country in single combat. However, watching some of my survival team physically stumble, weak to the point of being unable to walk after being away from McDonalds for only a few long days, illustrates a good point: Never underestimate the psychological value of eating a full and satisfying meal. Eating is far more important than the simple intake of nutrients; swallowing a tasty bit of well-cooked cow or freshly processed chicken might sound over-rated or unnecessary while sitting at a computer terminal, but it is tremendously important to the human psyche. Especially under trying conditions, such as when being hunted or subject to enemy fire; an army with no morale is a dead army.

    The only real use I see for these is to have in case of emergencies- imagine a pilot being able to carry enough packets in a pocket to survive a month without having to forage for food in case he is shot down. This would greatly increase his ability to evade capture and survive the experience. The same logic applies to soldiers cut off from the lines of supply; it is obviously better to feel hungry and thus demoralized than to be forced to surrender or die in your boots from something as banal as hunger. Everyday rations, however, call for something a little more fulfilling.

    I may be trolling a bit here, but I would say that if the guys at darpa do their jobs correctly, foot soldiers should be nearly obsolete for most purposes by 2025 anyway; this is analogous to the situation with piloted fighter aircraft and UCAVs. There are/will be so many faster, better and cheaper ways to kill people than giving assault rifles to 18 year old 'men'.

    Rev Neh

    --
    ... and there is no doubt, that one day he will be
    where the eye of his telescope has already been
  78. food replication by kaoshin · · Score: 1
    I think a pocket food replicator which generated food molecules from garbage would be more practical. Why not share a little of that palm pilot technology with some biomedical.

    This is probably suppossed to be incorporated with the implantable transponder with the 666 code.
    ~Whoever doesn't have the mark won't be able to eat~ I got a better way to use this microchip. You can stick it up your butt to closen its proximity to your digestive system. Maybe while you are in there digging you can find some of our tax dollars and give them back!!!!

  79. Re:You must be a jarhead Marine with no neck! by unitron · · Score: 1

    Respectful or not, it's redundant. The Marine Corps is the only branch of the armed services referred to as "jarheads".
    Whether, or under what circumstances, they should be is a separate discussion.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  80. Why not patches for other medications? by rsteele19 · · Score: 1

    Well they've had the nicotine patch for awhile, and now they're considering a nutritional patch. Why don't they use patches for other medications that should be delivered slowly over a period of time? Often medications that need to be delivered to the body over a period of time are administered in slow-dissolving capsules, but depending on a person's metabolism the rate the medication is actually absorbed can vary widely. Anyone have any insight into this?

    --

    This sig is umop apisdn.

  81. I'll have the Pizza patch. Hold the anchovies! by Chas · · Score: 2

    I'm a little skeptical about this. Of course I'm a little skeptical about just about everything. So that's no surprise.

    For short term situations, especially when you take into account the normal, high-calorie diet that an active soldier takes in (yes, it's quite high calorie, they burn in all in the course of an active day, though more sedentry MOS'es either tend to eat less, or fatten up).

    But as a long-term soloution, I don't think that a nutrient patch and liquid suppliments will cut it. It's not a complete substitute for the raw caloric intake required by the body. After a while, even with a perfectly balanced nutrient suppliment, the body's going to break down available fat and muscle tissue to get the raw materials neede to help keep cellular regeneration going. Otherwise parts of your body are going to die.

    Yeah, nutrient patches will slow this, but they won't stop it. Once a person reaches 0% body fat, the raw materials for cellular repair have to come from somewhere.


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  82. Re:Ground control to Python by exaptation · · Score: 1

    When was the last time you actually gave an order to a soldier (I mean as a citizen, not as an officer)?

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but concidering your view I suggest you are an American. Now let me tell you how these thing go in that country:
    The president has pretty unlimited control over the army, that is, he can start a war without consulting enyone (possibly calling it "peace enforcing operation" or something). What you, as a citizen can do, is to choose, out of couple of candidates, the one that you _believe_ shares your opinions of what is a "right thing" for the army to do. After he is elected, you have no control over his decisions whatsoever.

    Now the president may be a good and humane person afterall so what is there to worry about. Well things aren't quite that simple. Ever played "broken telephone"? There is a bunch of people sitting in a circle and one of them makes up simple message, about five words. He whispers it to the person next to him an he passes it along. After the round is complete the message comes back to the person who started it. Suprisingly, it takes about ten people to transform the message completely, even though every individual tries to preserve it as it is. The same thing happens in an army. No matter how noble and righteous the commanders and the people behind them might be, when the order reaches the soldier after passing a dozen levels of morons, lunatics, rednecks, the well_meaning_but_stupid (the average officer material that is), it will most likely be something like "Kill'em all, let God sort'em out!"
    With a system like that, would you rather like the soldiers to be conditioned robots or intelligent human beings cabable of making their own decicions and maybe thinking something like: "Why are we actually murdering these people? Wouldn't we all be better off at home taking it easy? Why can't we choose our own enemies anyway?"

    What I'm trying to say is, that 'The People' have very little to say what the soldiers of their armies do.

    -------------
    There are two kids of people, my kind and assholes.
    --Divine

  83. Re:Great! by anatoli · · Score: 2

    Throw the Slashdot patch in, and you're set.
    --

    --
    Industrial space for lease in Flatlandia.
  84. Real use: skinny geeks by gunner800 · · Score: 1
    This will be a small help for the military. Keep the soldiers alive an extra day or two. But the average soldier has a fair amount of body mass, and expends a lot of energy, and a patch just can't provide enough stuff for body upkeep.

    So I propose that this technology is better suited for use by skinny geeks. Small body mass means lower requirements for maintenance. Better yet, we expend virtually no energy (except, ironically, when we get up for snacks).

    As King of the Twig Geeks, and the only man ever to have negative body mass, I propose that we storm the nearest Army Place and demand these patches. We can make up some hacker-sounding words that will intimidate them. And if they try to shoot us, at least we're small targets.


    ---
    Dammit, my mom is not a Karma whore!

    1. Re:Real use: skinny geeks by radja · · Score: 2

      I'll join you.. if I turn sideways they have almost 3 mm width to aim at...silly dieting people... loosing weight is easy.. gaining is a bloody lot harder.

      //rdj

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    2. Re:Real use: skinny geeks by Sethb · · Score: 2

      Gaining weight is easy, just take in about 5 Big Macs a day. I think that an individuals metabolism or body chemistry has more to do with it than anything else.

      My roomie and I are the same height. He's skinny, I'm not. :) He eats half again as much as I do, we work out together several times a week. We both work at computers and pretty much have the same lifestyle. We're even the same damned height, but I've got probably 80 pounds on him. In essence, I can find nothing about him that says he should be skinny, but he is. Maybe he has worms.
      ---

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  85. European eating habits... by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


    Being an American currently living in London, I'd have to say I'm surprised that you are saying the Europeans have more healthy eating habits than Americans.

    I am used to eating low-fat foods in the US, but I am unable to find anything with a low-fat label in British grocery stores. There just doesn't seem to be a market here for lite foods. On top of that, there is a plethora of heavy foods like kidney pies that just makes my head spin.




    Seth
    1. Re:European eating habits... by jpatokal · · Score: 1
      Being an American currently living in London, I'd have to say I'm surprised that you are saying the Europeans have more healthy eating habits than Americans.

      Fortunately most of us Europeans aren't British. =) English cooking, aptly summarized as "cook it 'till it's dead, dead, dead", is rather infamous...

      ...not that the food is necessarily all that much healthier elsewhere in Europe, with the Scandinavians sticking to their meat-and-potatoes diet, the French drowning everything in butter, cream and oil, the East Europeans thinking that vegetarian food means deep-fried cheese, etc. But serving sizes are usually quite a bit smaller (even at McDonalds).

      For a more healthy diet, take a look at Asia: authentic Japanese, Chinese and Indian food tends to have a lot less protein and fat (read: meat) than the average American or European diet.

      Cheers,
      -j.

    2. Re:European eating habits... by Mai+Longdong · · Score: 1

      I guess you haven't had REAL Asian food. Believe me, a big bowl of stewed pig fat with rice is not what I like for lunch, but it's considered great cuisine in Taiwan and China. BTW, in Chinese the words for fat and meat are usually interchangable.

    3. Re:European eating habits... by OAB · · Score: 1

      I am used to eating low-fat foods in the US, but I am unable to find anything with a low-fat label in British grocery stores.
      Where do you shop? I find it impossible to go into a UK supermarket without being overwelmed by 9X% Fat Free crap.

    4. Re:European eating habits... by NetFu · · Score: 1

      That's true -- there's usually quite a difference between almost all mainstream Asian food in America and the traditional food of whichever ethnic group you're talking about. That's why my favorite Asian food is Vietnamese followed closely by Japanese. Before I was exposed to "REAL Asian food" I loved Chinese food, but now it literally makes me sick EXCEPT for most Dim Sum -- that's gotta be my third favorite. With a real Dim Sum place, you'll see probably about 1/5 dishes going around that make even my wife shudder.

      My wife is Vietnamese (so that may be why Viet food like Pho is my #1 favorite), so I can honestly tell you that pretty much any Vietnamese restaurant/deli that you walk into sells REAL Vietnamese food, no Americanized shit here -- if you don't like it, too bad!! I have to laugh sometimes because they really haven't figured out (yet) how to make some foods at least *look* or *sound* a little better to Americans! Oh yeah, give me a calf brain sandwich, a plate of grilled chicken feet, and a nice bowl of Pho Tai Chin Gau Gan Sach (hint: that Pho has lots of beef fat, tendon, tripe and other crap I would usually throw away from a steak). And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

      I may be exaggerating it a bit, but you get the idea -- un-Americanized Asian food is an adventure to say the least!

    5. Re:European eating habits... by steffl · · Score: 1

      being a slovak currently living in US I'd have to say:

      fat free food is a crap. you're fooling your eyes but you can't fool your body - if you eat something that does not have appropriate amount of calories you will be hungry even if you have your stomach full. you have to eat again and it creates discomfort etc...

      it's also basically uneatable - just look at the what they sell as yougurt in in US.

      the sugarless stuff is the same - sorry attempt to fool yourself. while pumping your body with chemicals.

      if you don't believe me check how many obese people are in us and in europe.

      obese people have either psychological problems (diet food is not going to solve them), or some real problems...

      now I am not saying that one should eat bacon and bacon mostly, but this fat free and sugarless craze in US is silly, even harmful.

      erik

      --
      ...all excited, don't know why...
    6. Re:European eating habits... by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      Tesco grocery store....


      Seth

  86. What's the point? by Arcanix · · Score: 1

    By 2025 we'll have an entirely robotic army; these patches won't be needed since there will be no human soldiers....until about 2050 when the robots inevitably revolt and start to acquire a taste for human flesh.

    1. Re:What's the point? by Get_Merry · · Score: 1

      Ok, and you work for skynet?

  87. We make them third by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 3

    According to some Unicef data (no URL) I read, during the horrible Ethiopian famine (remember "We are the world"?), Ethiopia actually exported grain to pay for their foreign debt.
    I don't know about the current one (you know there are people dying from hunger in Ethiopia now, don't you?), but I heard a CARE man on CNN that the country managed to increase food production and depend less on imports. Thus they stood longer, but not enough.

    Food donation and these patches can help in emergencies (Mozambique), but they will not solve the world food problem.
    Food produced in the 1st world (powder milk!) makes third world dependent of big companies.
    As the worthy anonymous I am answering to says, the Earth produces more than enough to feed mankind. It's the current economical and political organization that makes the distribution so unfair.
    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
    1. Re:We make them third by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      And it has nothing to do with the fact that they're regularly spending mucho dinero on their border war with Eritrea, and that numerous 3rd world nations similarly prioritize either their own land grabs or assisting others in war over feeding their people? Others deal with constant civil war... Sudan, Rwanda, Angola (on/off), Zaire, Eritrea, Ethiopia...

      India COULD be spending on, say, infrastructure. But you could probably bet your house on the idea that they'll raise their defense spending instead.

      *sigh* Develop first, and later they should be able to easily afford nuclear weaponry if that's what floats their boat.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:We make them third by LloydB · · Score: 1
      It's true: international food aid is frequently far less effective than it appears. Lords of Poverty, written by former UN worker Graham Hancock, multiplies example upon example of misappropriation and waste. A UN aid worker friend of mine vouches for its accuracy.

      Most surprising are explanations or how aid can be harmful. For example, the appearance of cheap, abundant foreign grain in a distressed country depresses prices for local farmers and forces them out of business; the following year there is no domestic crop at all.

      Hanock offers the verdict that much foreign aid is well-intentioned but very badly implemented; he suggests a corrective emphasis on grassroots community and church-based groups.

  88. "Beggars in Spain" by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    There is a science-fiction story "Beggars in Spain" written by some woman, about genetical engineering to make people sleepless. They end being smarter, richer, better than we sleepers. Then there is persecution and a gap between subspecies. The story was extended with more volumes.

    Anyway, you don't waste your sleeping time. Your brain processes your day (dreams).
    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
    1. Re:"Beggars in Spain" by T'Kethry · · Score: 1

      The author of Beggars in Spain is Nancy Kress

      --
      Death is but a doorway.
      Here, let me hold that for you.
  89. Consumption control, not population by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    The problem us not population growth. Remember, more people means more brains, more workforce (that's what open source is about, a surplus of people that can be directed to solve their problems, instead of trying to merely survive).

    The problem is consumption growth.

    India (which is leaving the third world in some aspects) has two?-fold the population of the US, but their pollution, imports, consumption is lesser.
    Who is burning oil into CO2? Not Burkina Faso, certainly.

    I don't remebers the numbers, but the average American (and the Europeans and Japanese and me) is worth several tens of third-worlders in energy, oil and materials consumption?

    Who should try to restrain themselves?
    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  90. Nit: Carbohydrates aren't necessary... by Spoing · · Score: 1

    ...I've gone weeks without them. Many animals also live quite well without them; preditors, scavengers,....

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  91. Time to throw some pepper spray on this love-in by xtal · · Score: 4

    Us Canucks will get a kick out of the title. But, that's not what I'm going to rant about.. See, sure, there's enough food to feed everyone 1.5 times over, there's enough bombs to carpet-nuke the planet, too. That's not what the problem is.

    The "people of the world" cannot just give away food. We did this here in Canada - we gave massive grain surpluses to India. Do you know what they did with their cost savings? They started a nuclear weapons research program, so that now, they can threaten global stability and Pakistan with nukes. Governments suck.

    Food is one thing, resources are another. We in the 1st world consume most of the resources. That's just the way it is. To say that all the people in India, Africa and even Asia are going to live like me here in Canada is just stupid. There aren't enough resources. And I, and I doubt you, are going to go live in a tarpaper project to make sure everyone lives equally. Life sucks, don't it?

    Maybe I'm being overly cynical, but there are complex issues. You feed a nation's people, you upset the balance of trade, and that nation can then do things like buy arms to kill people. It isn't cut and dry - obviously the international community needs to help out, but for there to be long-term solutions these nations need their own development and place controls on populations, deal with internal strife & conflict, etc etc.

    Kudos

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Time to throw some pepper spray on this love-in by ddraig · · Score: 1

      > The "people of the world" cannot just give away food. We did this here in Canada - we gave massive
      > grain surpluses to India. Do you know what they did with their cost savings? They started a nuclear
      > weapons research program, so that now, they can threaten global stability and Pakistan with nukes.

      So, hang on. You're suggesting that we let these people starve because it seems that their governments make weapons, like, well, pretty much every other government about?

      Doesn't this strike you as a wee tad callous?

      >Governments suck.

      No shit sherlock. If we ignore the bullshit ideology canards, the 20th century has seen the spectacle of Statism wiping out millions of little people. The sooner we realise that nationalism gives us enormous governments and therefore enormous armed forces the better. Roll on autonomous collectives and city-states.

      > Food is one thing, resources are another. We in the 1st world consume most of the resources.
      > That's just the way it is.

      You selfish, narrow-minded, short-sighted dickhead.

      How long do you think they are going to put up with this? What will happen when their level of development starts to approach ours? Do you think they will just idly sit back and watch this happen? If they have any sense at all they will arm up and come and take it off selfish bastards like you. The *only* reason you live so comfortably now is due to the happy historical accident of your being born in a wealthy nation. I seriously doubt anything you have done in your life qualifies you for the riches you have at your fingertips. You don't *deserve* your comparative wealth, it might do you some good to be a little more humble about your good fortune.

      > To say that all the people in India, Africa and even Asia are going to live like me here in
      > Canada is just stupid. There aren't enough resources.

      What if I told you that 96% of everything dug up, mined etc was wasted? Yup, we use only 4% of these resources. More efficient manufacturing would go a long way towards reducing our need for stupendous amounts of, well, everything.

      Then again, so would nanotech :)

      > And I, and I doubt you, are going to go live in a
      >tarpaper project to make sure everyone lives equally. Life sucks, don't it?

      You know, I expect to live a long time. One day in the future, when we have sorted out this stupid resource problem (I guess by mining the asteroids or something), comments like this are going to be read with horror, people will ask me "was it *really* like that?"

      Step outside your own narrow little worldview for a moment and consider just how selfish and inhuman your comments are. An awful lot of things have died to keep you alive, and are you worth it?

      No, if these comments are any sign.

      And as for your "tarpaper project" comment, there ARE ways to build cities etc without despoiling the planet. It's just that in the west, resources are so cheap that, fuck it, we can AFFORD to waste 'em. It's not impossible, and it's not uncomfortable, it's just that most people (like you) can't be fucked.

      > Maybe I'm being overly cynical,

      "callous" is a better word.

      > but there are complex issues. You feed a nation's people, you upset
      > the balance of trade, and that nation can then do things like buy arms to kill people.

      So, tell me again: who died and made you god?
      What right have you to condemn people to death because their government *might* kill some people?

      > It isn't cut and dry - obviously the international community needs to help out,
      > but for there to be long-term solutions these nations need their own development and place controls
      > on populations, deal with internal strife & conflict, etc etc.

      The best way to reduce population is to educate the women. Seriously. That's the single factor which will drop birthrates by the most.

      And consider this: most of the trouble these third world nations have, especially in Africa, can be directly related to the Great Powers of the last few centuries (and the first half of this one) screaming in and fucking up completely the existing social and political structure. This is something they are still sorting out, and will probably be sorting out for generations to come. Don't you think there is some moral duty for those of us who have benefitted from these intrusions to help these people out?

      Have you seen the figures for how trivial the cost to unfuck these places actually is, compared with the amount of money and wealth in the first world?

      God I wish this thing had a spell checker. And wider text entry windows.

      Ddraig

  92. But what... by radja · · Score: 2

    What do I do if I want extra mustard? those plasters probably taste bland anyway...

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  93. A boon to food addicts? by Hallow · · Score: 1

    One of the hardest things about losing weight for a lot of people is that they still have to eat. A drug addict can live without the drugs. A food addict cannot.

    This would allow someone with a food addiction to actually not eat.

    As far as the military application is concerned, will the patch come with some sort of hunger supressing chemical? Or maybe some sort of ingestible foam with no nutritional value that allows you to feel full and gets rid of the hunger pangs cause by an empty stomach?

  94. Gaming Sessions!!!!!!!! by Cmdr_Pooky · · Score: 1

    This would be great for one of those all night gaming sessions. That way you could keep on fraggin'!!!!

    --
    Cmdr_Pooky sgg@nettally.com http://www.nettally.com/sgg/
  95. Hey now! by Shin+Elendale · · Score: 1
    At the end of my physics course last year I managed to stay up for 72 hours straight... Oh, never mind... I also spent ~$80 on coke (the drinking kind fool) and completely emptied my supply. I can't really remember anything after that though...

    -Elendale (in fact, I think I'm still tired)

    --

    IANAT (I Am Not A Troll)

  96. At last a use for GM food by plumserve · · Score: 1

    Let them eat cake?

    Let them ooze GM foodstuffs!

    --
    hello jello
  97. This technology could be a cure for diabetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It sounds like a closed loop system - constant real time monitoring of chemicals and nutrients in the bloodstream, constant release of appropriate substances the body needs.

    Instead of using it as a military feeding system, it could be the basis of a real time insulin delivery system that accurately mimics how a healthy body releases insulin. It could be a computerized cure.

    Manual insulin injection really sucks. It prevents rapid death, but it is a horrible approximation of how the body reacts in real time. Injections at certain times of a day only give a very rough approximation - so rough that the body often takes a great deal of damage, leading to shortened lifespan and major medical problems like loss of limbs or sight. This technology could potentially prevent all of that.

    I would hope such a system would be affordable, but I'd do whatever was necessary to get it for myself.

  98. I've got the Jolt IV drip bag by Mr.roboto · · Score: 1

    Because I can't waste time with inefficient methods of consumption such as swallowing.

    --
    Don't call my crazy, that's what they called me back in the home!
  99. Good question. by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    shouldn't they be working on developing world peace by 2025, not super-soldiers?

    It'd sure be nice, but there's no money, power, or glory in world peace.

    We are actually at the top of a very unbalanced food chain, I worry about that. News clips of Arabs and Cubans chanting anti-American slogans makes my skin crawl...just build another McDonald's, the natives will love us!
    Ugh.


    The Divine Creatrix in a Mortal Shell that stays Crunchy in Milk

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  100. The more things change, the more... by alumshubby · · Score: 1

    My dad, a WW II veteran, bitched about the powdered eggs in K rations. My eldest brother talked about those crummy C-rats in Vietnam. For a younger brother, it was the MREs (Meals Refused by Ethiopians). Now grunts will be denied even the simple physical pleasures of chewing and swallowing their miserable battlefield rations.

    BTW, on a technical note, how the heck can your body absorb enough calories transcutaneously to keep you going? Sounds like it might work OK for drug delivery, but it'd have to be an awful big patch to get 2000 calories into a trooper q 24 hours.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  101. Re:Ground control to Python by uberslack · · Score: 1

    There are two kids of people, my kind and assholes.
    --Divine


    actually... mink stole's character, connie marble, said this... not divine... just a nitpick... sorry...

    --
    Just because you're paranoid does not mean that the world is not full of assholes.
  102. And sometimes you just don't want to eat them. by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 2

    During one REFORGER, we got two MRE per day. This was before the included the heaters, so not only could you not eat them, you couldn't play with them. nobody ate anything but the crackers and the coffee. cold corned beef hash and omlette with bacon pieces (cooked eggs were definitely not made for long term storage) are just not edible. Of course, 30 days with no food is a small price to pay for 30 days with no KP. Now if the would just add some amphetemine to these patches, 30 days with no sleep might not be so bad.
    ^. .^

  103. Re:Not good enough..??? by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

    Damn, you must be a big guy, those things have like 1800 calories each. they're mostly flavored fat
    ^. .^

  104. Bathroom Patch by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

    It's called Depends, they're not just for incontinence anymore.
    ^. .^

    1. Re:Bathroom Patch by Lockle · · Score: 1

      Try the Stadium Pal. Ahh, the miracle of plastics have made it so when the food patch is complete, geeks can just sit in their chair and only get up once a week to empty the bladder pouch and get new food patches =)

  105. Microneedles and Carrier Vehicles by Voltage_Gate · · Score: 2

    Georgia Tech has been doing new research on patches with microneedle arrays that you can't even feel. A tiny computer could control the dosage, potentially.

    http://www.gtri.gatech.edu/res-news/NEEDLES.html

    Transdermal drug delivery is currently my research topic in school. The idea is to find solvents that go through your skin (stratum corneum is the tough layer) harmlessly and carry a drug with it that goes into your blood. There's a lot of new research for this. I recommend the Journal of Controlled Release, J. of Pharmacological Pharm., and others as good resources in this field.

  106. Re:From the "perhaps in another dimension" departm by alumshubby · · Score: 1

    "Let not ambition mock their useful toil,
    Their homely joys, nor destiny obscure...

    --Thomas Gray, "Elegy in a Country Churchyard"

    Glycogen is glycogen, in the muscles of bicycling Yuppies and Anonymous Cowards alike. Don't be such a pinhead.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  107. What about beer? by thetechweenie · · Score: 1

    Can they give this technology to Guinness? That way, I don't have to leave my computer to get another beer every ten minutes!

    --


    Um, this is my sig.
    1. Re:What about beer? by kawlyn · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need one of those Peltier can cooler

      --

      When someone yells "Stop" or goes limp, or taps out, the fight is over.
  108. Almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea... by Messiah · · Score: 1
    The patch may consist of a tiny microchip that, after first determining exactly what your body needs, transfers vitamins to your body transdermally.

    Am I the only one who thinks this sounds like the first step towards the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation's Nutri-Matic?

  109. Yum Yum by =X3unYr= · · Score: 1

    Delicious...can't wait to get injected with more microbiotic goodies....whatz the prob with JOLT hey...I thought THAT was a viable source of a days required nutrients???

    --
    TH3 L@t3X Pr0gr@mm3r...G0d3ss of 0p3n-s0ur(3.
  110. To quote the immortal Sam Kinison by Wah · · Score: 2

    I'm like anyone else on this planet -- I'm very moved by world hunger. I see the same commercials, with those little kids, starving, and very
    depressed. I watch those kids and I go, 'Fuck, I know the FILM crew could give this kid a sandwich!' There's a director five feet away
    going, 'DON'T FEED HIM YET! GET THAT SANDWICH OUTTA HERE! IT DOESN'T WORK UNLESS HE LOOKS HUNGRY!!!' But I'm not
    trying to make fun of world hunger. Matter of fact, I think I have the answer. You want to stop world hunger? Stop sending these people
    food. Don't send these people another bite, folks. You want to send them something, you want to help? Send them U-Hauls. Send them
    U-Hauls, some luggage, send them a guy out there who says, 'Hey, we been driving out here every day with your food, for, like, the last
    thirty or forty years, and we were driving out here today across the desert, and it occurred to us that there wouldn't BE world hunger, if
    you people would LIVE WHERE THE FOOD IS! YOU LIVE IN A DESERT! YOU LIVE IN A FUCKING DESERT! NOTHING GROWS OUT HERE!
    NOTHING'S GONNA GROW OUT HERE! YOU SEE THIS? HUH? THIS IS SAND. KNOW WHAT IT'S GONNA BE A HUNDRED YEARS FROM
    NOW? IT'S GONNA BE SAND! YOU LIVE IN A FUCKING DESERT! GET YOUR STUFF, GET YOUR SHIT, WE'LL MAKE ONE TRIP, WE'LL
    TAKE YOU TO WHERE THE FOOD IS! WE HAVE DESERTS IN AMERICA -- WE JUST DON'T LIVE IN THEM, ASSHOLES!"
    --From an appearance on Rodney Dangerfield's "It's Not Easy Being Me," 1984.
    --From here
    --

    --
    +&x
  111. Re:There won't *be* a 3rd world. by Wah · · Score: 1

    Is there *really* any evidence that this *won't* happen?

    Just history.

    --

    --
    +&x
  112. It's a distribution problem, not production by hawk · · Score: 2

    Speaking as an economist rather than an attorney this time . . .

    Save fro the short and sudden famines that we occasionally see, starvation is a distribution problem, not a production problem.

    More than enough food is produced to feed the world. More than enough is produced in or sent to countries suffering from starvation to feed them. It just doesn't get to those who need it.

    By far the leading cause is corruption or malice, by governments and rebel military forces. At a distant second is central planning, which history has never found to work for anything bigger than a small village or commune--certainly not anything big enough to call a city, let alone a country [more than half of the soviet potato crop used to rot every year after being harvested do to failures of central planners].

    If you want to fight starvation, gathering food isn't the way to do it. Put an infinite supply of ofod in those countries, and you will make at most a negligible difference in the number of folks starvign. Instead, look at the governments and rebels that either steal it, or prevent it from arriving to suit their own agendas.

    hawk

  113. British food by hawk · · Score: 3

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

    Britain did not take to (and rule) the seas and start an empire for commerce, nor Queen, nor glory, nor God.

    Rather, the young men of England would do *anything* to get away from the food.

  114. Re:Ground control to Python by exaptation · · Score: 1

    There have been democratic armies where soldiers elected their officers and where orders were not followed if they didn't make sense, in the Spanish civil war for example. They were defeated I admit, but they were facing a much more numerous opponent plus were betrayed by their allies. But they were effective organizations and put up a good fight.

    We haven't yet seen a battle between an archistic top-down controlled and and an anarchistic bottom-up controlled armies of equal material strenght but if we ever will, I will predict the latter to win because of it's greater adaptability and innovability. Of course it can only be used if all the soldiers truly believe their cause, wich they should in every war.

    And yes, I have read Sun Zu too and the example you provided is a very good one of the fascist nature of the traditional military. Isn't it a bit paradoxal that to protect democratic institutions you need a fascist one?

    --------------------
    If there's one thing I hate in this world it's the men who boast about the size of their marrows.
    --Tank Girl

  115. Non-stop gaming. by YT · · Score: 1

    Ohhh.. non-stop gaming here we come!

  116. Placebo: the numbers don't work ! by redelm · · Score: 2

    Drinking and patches are very different. You can certainly absorb everything you need from drinking. Even fiber if you put in some psyillum.

    But a patch is very limited. You can only absorb milligram quantities from it. Enough for pharmaceuticals and maybe some vitamines (maybe not C though).

    But a combat soldier needs 4000 Calories (16.5 MJ) of food energy per day on a continuous basis. Thats 1000 grams of carbohydrates or protein, or 450 grams of fat (unlikely). Your endurance athlete is in much the same situation.

    No way you can absorb 1000 grams of carbohydrates per day through your skin. Not even if you sat in a heated jacuzzi/wetspacesuit of 5% glucose.

    Now a patch might be a nice placebo, or good to administer some drugs/vits, but is not going to be useful for more than a short (24h) fast.

    1. Re:Placebo: the numbers don't work ! by Amazing+Proton+Boy · · Score: 1

      When I was in the Corps we trained to operate effectively for extended periods on as little 1/2 an MRE per day. That is well under 1000 calories. You really can't do it for more than a week though. You start to get very sluggish, you fall asleep a lot (once I fell asleep on a hump) and you start to make bad decisions. Some of the old-timers had some tricks, like putting instant coffee under your eyelids, that would perk you up for a half hour or so, but the only really effective option was sleep and lots of food. I always had a hard time keeping anything down from the first big meal though.

  117. Don't live in the fucking desert by slashdot-me · · Score: 2

    Should we feed people who lie in the desert?

    There are two ways to approach this problem. We could do what's best for me (Ryan) or we could do what's best for "society" (ie most efficient global resource usage). I suppose we could do what's best for them, but that's just the first case as seen from the other end of the stick.

    1 What's best for Ryan.
    Starving people in deserts have negligible impact on my life. I wouldn't have known they exist were it not for television. It would be best for me to spend my money on things that impact my life.
    Verdict: ignore 'em.

    2 What's best for "society."
    If you live in a desert you cannot grow food (that's why it's a desert). So we must either (a) move food to the people -or- (b) move the people to food. Obviously moving the people is far more resource efficient than moving their food (and their children's food, etc).
    Verdict: relocate poeple to non-desert areas.

    Don't bitch to me about my cars if you want to ship food thousands of miles. If I start driving three thousand miles to go to the grocery store THEN you can tell me to stop polluting. Otherwise shut up.

    Ryan

  118. Carrying capacity? by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    Well, Manhattan is above its carrying capacity, Japanese cities are.
    That's why they import everything. The current distribution system enables that New-Yorkers and Japanese receive food, fuel, energy, and the rest and send the garbage elsewhere. And Ethiopia can't.

    As I said, the land can produce more than enough to sustain the people, modulo the occasional drought, but also California and Japan are earthquake areas, and twisters frequently attack the Atlantic coast of the US.

    You remembered me that the CNN commentator said that anyway lots more will die in Ethiopia from AIDS than from famine.
    __

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  119. Do what they do in the Andes by Wah · · Score: 1

    and just chew a few cocoa leaves. Stay awake for days, good energy, bad for everything else.

    --

    --
    +&x
  120. Caffeine a vitamin? by dsplat · · Score: 1
    The patch may consist of a tiny microchip that, after first determining exactly what your body needs, transfers vitamins to your body transdermally. Goodbye Penguin Mints, hello Penguin Patch!


    The last time I checked, there was no USRDA for caffeine.
    --
    The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  121. MILK?!?!? (OT, but.....) by goliard · · Score: 2

    The MAJORITY of H. sapiens are lactose intolerant from shortly after weaning. The ~80% of caucasians that can digest milk sugar are decidely in the minority of our species. On average, only something like 30% of H. Sapiens over the age of 5 can metabolize lactose.

    When the US has shipped donations of powdered milk for "hunger relief" to places like SE Asia and Africa, most of it is thrown away (or, as one anthropologist discovered, used to white-wash walls) because it made the people there very, very sick to ingest it.

    Powdered milk is a technology that provides food for those few (mostly caucasian) fortunates who have the genes to use it. It is poison to the rest.
    ----------------------------------------------

    --
    -*- Any technology indistinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced -*-
    1. Re:MILK?!?!? (OT, but.....) by goliard · · Score: 2

      Shrug. This is a well established fact.

      If you want something more technical than a science museum website, try Durham, William H. Coevolution; Genes, Culture and Human Diversity. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. 1991.
      ----------------------------------------------

      --
      -*- Any technology indistinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced -*-
  122. Re:Ground control to Python by Python · · Score: 2
    When was the last time you actually gave an order to a soldier (I mean as a citizen, not as an officer)?

    Every time I vote. The US military is controlled by the civilian government, lock, stock and barrel.
    --
    Python

    --

    Python

  123. Re:Ground control to Python by Python · · Score: 2
    What I'm trying to say is, that 'The People' have very little to say what the soldiers of their armies do.

    Except that in the US, where I am from (on that point you are correct), the military is made up of volunteer citizens (no conscription) that take an oath to uphold and defend the constitution not blindly follow orders from any president. We also have laws that restrict what the military can do and a strong ethic that runs to the core of our fighting forces that restrains what those units do.

    I'm not sure what you are suggesting or complaining about. We have a well disciplined, lawful and powerful military that obeys the orders given it by our democratically elected civilian government.
    --
    Python

    --

    Python

  124. Re:Ground control to Python by Python · · Score: 2
    And yes, I have read Sun Zu too and the example you provided is a very good one of the fascist nature of the traditional military. Isn't it a bit paradoxal that to protect democratic institutions you need a fascist one?

    One word: speed. In combat, you don't have time for a discussion, a debate or hesitation. There are two types of people on the battlefield, the quick and the dead.

    Democratic methods move slowly, so they don't tend to fare well in combat situations.
    --
    Python

    --

    Python

  125. Encounter at Farpoint? by blacklambda · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember the first episode of STTNG where the crew of the Enterprise was put on trial for all of the crimes of humanity? During the trial scene the soldiers that came out has an attachment to their suits that spit out a narcotic that once they were hooked on allowed their superiors to control them. A similar plot is the white the the founders gave to the jem'hadar. Now be fore i look like too much of a geek doesn't this meal on a chip thing sound like it could have the same effects? imagine... years after retireing from the military they can "call you back into service" by using the chip to deny you of some nutrient or another... the possibilities are disgusting.

    --
    Ryan Dorman, CCNA Network Communications Specialist Millersville Univesrity
  126. depletion runs by redelm · · Score: 1

    I have no doubt about what you say. But even 1/2 an MRE is alot better than nothing. Getting even 50 or 100 grams of carbohydrate a day (200-400 Calories) will help enormously because the fat reserves have better metabolic pathways when glucose is present.

    I seriously doubt you could even absorb 50 grams glucose per day from a patch.

  127. Can anybody answer this? by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    The idea of these patches seem reasonable, for use for very short periods until a soldier can get real food/rest - but I tend to wonder what the jokes will be like amongst the men (ever smelled a Nicoderm patch? It smells like cat piss)...

    The caffeine chewing gum seems old hat to me, as well - looking through my backpack, I have a pack of "Stay Alert" caffeine gum (dated 1997) - each stick contains 50 mg of caffeine, about half of what is in a cup of coffee (the pack reccommends chewing 2-4 sticks, equiv. to 1-2 cups of coffee). The stuff is made by Amurol Confections Company. It comes in mint and cinnamon flavors (I am not sure if it is still being sold, but the above website still carries "nutritional" info on the product - if anyone knows where it is sold on the net, or a similar product, post a response). It also doesn't take very good (has a bitter aftertaste).

    On a final note, and what I am wondering if anyone can answer (and maybe I answered it myself above - because the patches smell like cat piss), is why haven't transdermal patches been appropriated by the "illegal" drug market? In other words, why can't you get a cocaine/meth/heroin/E transdermal patch? Are the patches difficult to manufacture? Is it because they wouldn't give an instant "high"? Or are they actually being used, but only in niche areas (I am very naive about the hard drug trade - but I have always wondered if such hard drug patches would ever be made - with maybe certain logos/designs stamped on them)?

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  128. *Facts* about world population by dublin · · Score: 2
    This is a bit OT, but several posts here have strayed into this patch as a solution to overpopulation-caused hunger. Just to set the record straight about the world's population amid all the D6B/overpopulation hysteria:

    - Population rates are at an all-time high because people are living longer, not because too many babies are being born. (This is not a bad thing!)

    - The consequences of the wrong reaction to this growth could be serious: Over 60 countries are at or below "replacement rates", including all the major industrialized nations.

    - These countries will face significant labor shortages and a declining population to support the growing number of elderly. (Utimately exposing Ponzi schemes like Social Security.)

    - Only Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East are significantly above replacement rates.

    - The population paranoia is not even supported by the UN itself: Almost all of the D6B press is driven by the UN Population Fund (UNFPA).

    - The UNFPA is not a UN agency, it is an independent agency operating under UN auspices, with close ties to nongovernmental organizations like International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) and Marie Stopes, which have clear political agendas (and an economic interest in promoting thier point of view.)

    - The UN's chief population demographers work for the UN Population Division (UNPD), which is an official entity, operating as a branch of the UN Secretariat.

    - UNPD's take on population growth is *quite different*: UNPD has three growth scenarios, and they currently favor the Low Growth scenario as the most likely. This scenario shows population peaking in 2040 and declining thereafter.

    Source: http://www.worldmag.com/world/issue/10-09-99/inter national_2.asp You may or may not agree with World's editorial position, but I have found them to be obsessively accurate on factual issues.

    Sony:hardware::Microsoft:software
    CompactFlash: IBM Microdrive, Flash, Ether, Modem, etc.

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  129. Re:From the "perhaps in another dimension" departm by fmoody · · Score: 1
    As for working on world peace by 2025:

    Are you serious? *rolled eyes* They've been working on that for longer than 2000 years, and the end is not in sight. If you're in a fight, might as well come out on top...

    As for electrolytes:

    Some good points but two things I wanted to point out. Electrolytes in water? You get water where you can and purify it. That means you'd have to carry a powder and get them to dose themselves. Easier to just say, "Drink your water and wear your patch".

    By the same token, transdermal hydration might run into a problem with impurities. See, your digestive tract is a wonderfully nice thing... Drop those little tablets into the water, watch em fizz, drink up and let Mother Nature handle the rest. Don't think you can do similar things easily with the transdermal hydration idea.

  130. You Mean MRE by Redking · · Score: 1

    You said "MERs" but probably meant MREs, as in Meals Ready to Eat. Or in real military lingo, "Meals Readily Exitable". You make your own conclusions about the fiber content.

    ------------------------------------------------ --

    A little boy was standing in front of a mirror in the restroom at John F. Kennedy Airport, when in walked a Marine staff sergeant, dressed in his dress blues. The little boy turned to the Marine and said, "Wow! Are you a Marine?"

    The Marine replied, "Why, yes I am, young man. Would you like to wear my hat?"

    "Boy, would I!," said the little boy. He took the hat and placed it on his head and turned to admire himself in the mirror.

    As he was looking in the mirror, he heard the door open and through a ray of bright light, a man entered the room. But, this was not just a man -- he was more than a man. He was an Airborne Ranger.

    The little boy turned and went over to the soldier. As he approached him, he could see the reflection in his boots. His eyes widened as he stared up at the soldier's chest full of medals and combat ribbons. He tried to speak, but he couldn't. Finally, he took a deep breath, and managed to say, "Excuse me, Sir. Are you an Airborne Ranger?"

    The Ranger replied with a thunderous voice, "Why yes, I am!! Would you like to shine my boots?"

    The little boy smiled, and said, "Oh, no sir!! I'm not a Marine. I'm just wearing his hat!"

    --
    Rangers Lead the Way!
  131. oh really... by SEAL · · Score: 1
    As the body's water content drops, blood gets thicker, resulting in poorer flow and consequently poorer delivery of oxygen and other needed chemicals to the muscles and brain.

    Where did you pull that statistic from?

    Consider, for a moment, someone preparing to climb Mt. Everest. He or she spends many months living at around 18,000 feet in order to allow the body to adjust to the altitude. The blood becomes thicker, with these climbers showing around 3x the normal amount of red blood cells. This allows the body to better transport oxygen in an environment where it is scarce.

    Yes, water is important, and yes, dehydration is dangerous. But the thickness of your blood is not the primary performance indicator.

    Best regards,

    SEAL

    1. Re:oh really... by K-Man · · Score: 1

      True, large volumes of hemoglobin, and sufficient water to support them, is a primary performance indicator. When the water-to-blood cell ratio drops too low, however, clotting and heart attacks are major hazards.

      In bicycling (and presumably other endurance sports), use of EPO to enhance hemoglobin volume has led to many deaths, and the imposition of arbitrary blood-count limits (since EPO use is undetectable). Deaths occur after races and high-stress conditions when the blood is moving more slowly and is more apt to clot.

      Major racers such as Marco Pantani have been banned from some tours due to these high levels, whether naturally occurring or not.

      --
      ---- "If we have to go on with these damned quantum jumps, then I'm sorry that I ever got involved" - Erwin Schrodinger
    2. Re:oh really... by SEAL · · Score: 1
      To state it more clearly (in agreement with you): red blood cell count is the primary factor in endurance.

      Just in confirmation... here's a link to an article about EPO:

      http://216.247.90.253/archive/6649.html

  132. Vietnamese quisine by carlos_benj · · Score: 1
    "Before I was exposed to "REAL Asian food" I loved Chinese food, but now it literally makes me sick EXCEPT for most Dim Sum -- that's gotta be my third favorite. With a real Dim Sum place, you'll see probably about 1/5 dishes going around that make even my wife shudder."

    Two friends and I went to a Vietnamese place a few years ago. There were one or two items on the menu I recognized and I have to confess I went with a safe bet. One of the guys asked what they recommended and was brought what appeared to be a bowl of translucent worms that smelled like a combination of an open sewer and Vicks VapoRub! He didn't finish it.

    carlos

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  133. oh yeah? by nomadic · · Score: 1

    That's nothing...I had some lobster at a restaurant the other night, and it was slightly dry!!! Worst part was there was no sauce, so I had to drench it with melted butter...

  134. Re:Ground control to Python by exaptation · · Score: 1

    You should join the army. With an attitude like that they would make you a general.

    --------------------
    Fire Your Boss!

  135. Syrius Sybernetics Corporation - Nutrimatic by tsheff · · Score: 1
    Sounds like something from the HHGG (hitchhikers guide to the galacy).

    "An analysis has been done on your taste buds and this beverage has been specially formulated to meet your needs for taste and nutrition!"

    Then again, this would eliminate power lunches.

    --
    Sig? What's a SIG?
  136. Re:Ground control to Python by Python · · Score: 2

    Already did. Spent a whole decade in the Infantry.
    --
    Python

    --

    Python

  137. Re:There won't *be* a 3rd world. by ddraig · · Score: 1
    Is there *really* any evidence that this *won't* happen?


    Just history.

    ... which shows us a gradual bleeding away of the differences between cultures, and a steady erosion of the power imbalance between the rulers and the ruled. History has shown us that you get richer via trade than you do via war, that modern weapons don't just kill people, they kill man-made assets, and trading your way to the top is better than bombing everyone around you to a lower level.