Slashdot Mirror


Diablo 2 Finally Hits Shelves

Diablo 2 arrived at Babbages today. CowboyNeal picked up our copies this morning. I'm a level 10 Sorceress named CmdrTaco, so if you see me, give me cool amulets or something. They pre-ordered 1.5 million copies... 1.5 million sick days are expected to be called in tomorrow as 1.5 million users sit and home and swear that Blizzard's servers keep crashing. So far its been a lot of fun (excluding the stability problems: we were about to open the door to the boss that concludes act I when the servers melted down hard core). Update: 06/30 01:11 PM by CT : Pater & I are hanging out by the rogue encampment waypoint in a game named 'Slashdot' on USEast. We're just idling, but feel free to deposit tips at our feet so that we can be more 31337 ;) We beat Act I already: this is a damn addictive game.

207 comments

  1. When will EB restock? by antdude · · Score: 2

    Anyone how often will EB stores restock D2 orders? I was unable to get it from three local EB stores. :( Does Best Buys and CompUSA (too expensive) have them yet?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re: When will EB restock? by antdude · · Score: 2

      I just found out EB stores will restock at around noon. I hope so! Must get!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:When will EB restock? by Tihstae · · Score: 1

      Anyone how often will EB stores restock D2 orders? I was unable to get it from three local EB stores. :( Does Best Buys and CompUSA (too expensive) have them yet?

      Best Buy in my area didn't have any but the Comp USA did. Retail is $59.99.

    3. Re:When will EB restock? by mduell · · Score: 1

      You can always get it from EBworld.com here.
      It says it will ship within 24 hours, so the must have lots in stock. (Also, limit of 4/person/day) However, the page looks pretty hastily put up (Game title repeated three times in a row, two different ways [II instead of 2]).

      Hehe, its kinda funny that under the catagory "EBWorld.com customers who bought this item also bought:" they include The Sims (i thought that game was for little kids, D2 is rated M)

      Mark Duell

  2. 8 players. by veldrane · · Score: 1

    Only 8 players per session as far as I know...

    -Veldrane

  3. Re:Better, Free, Open-Source Alternatives to Diabl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Those are great games. But are there multiuser versions of some of them now? I think that's what makes Diablo and similar games so attractive (in addition to the graphics).

  4. Finishing games and contracts. by tjwhaynes · · Score: 2

    In case you haven't noticed, tons of people start big ambititous software products in Linux, but nobody follows through. I frequent linuxgames.com and happypenguin.com but I'm sick and tired of reading about this or that new project when 90% of them go unfinished. I just wish someone would do a -mildy- ambitious game and finish it, something along the lines of dragonwarrior 1 for the nes or something...

    Frustrating? Definitely. Surprising? No.

    I've been on the other side of the fence, involved in trying to produce a multi-scrolling beat-em-up as a collaboration over the web. And the one thing that kills off more projects than anything else is RealLife(TM). A lot of projects are started by students who have long summers to stir projects into life and get something going. And then they get jobs (in the case of my cohorts, that included jobs with Psygnosis) and any release of that software is suddenly off the cards. Sometimes that can be due to contractual obligations - most software companies require their employees to NOT work on projects similar to their actual employment. Some companies even go as far as 'Intellectual Carte Blanc' and say any software written by the employess is owned by the software company, regardless of the fact that it was written in the employee's weekends...

    Contractual obligations aside, I see signs that projects which reach a critical momentum do not fall by the wayside. Good examples of open-source games which have reached fruition are Xpilot, Angband and it's many offspring and FreeCiv. There are many other 'small' games, such as the ones distributed with Gnome, and quite a lot of really pretty good card games.

    So, if you are fed up of seeing games projects fall apart, the most useful thing you can do is locate a project which you think looks promising, and help it. This can be graphics, sound, music, suggestions, gameplay ideas, UI improvements. It's not just coding that makes a good game, so even if you don't want to offer programming skills, there is plenty that can be done in the way of support. To be honest, it's often a great help to the author to know that someone likes the project - feedback is often infrequent and patchy. If the author gets feedback, then the author usually feels that it is worth continuing. Maybe that is all that stands between some finished projects and the rest.

    Cheers,

    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
  5. Damn by circuskid · · Score: 1

    What fuckin' luck... I'm moving and USWorst won't have my damn DSL moved until the 17th. Anyone know how successful a lawsuite for depriving me of Diablo 2 for two weeks would be? What would I sue for? Emotional damage?

    --
    sig this
  6. Terminus,Terminus,Terminus! (Was Re:Here We Go Aga by ZaMoose · · Score: 1

    Race out and buy Terminus. Not only does this badboy support Linux (*Ahem* after two patches, however), but it's darn fun. Graphics might not be on par with Freespace, but they're up there with Tachyon:TF (for any Bruce Campbell fans out there, this Windoze-only game is a must-have). The Newtonian Physics flight model is just too cool, I have to say. Haven't gotten too into the story mode just yet (a few routine patrol missions, mine-hunting, etc.) But it seems very promising.

    You might want to rush out to whatever EB is handy; when I got mine, the clerk said they'd only gotten two copies in (now they have one! *grin*). She'd also never heard of the game and after taking one look at the box, said "Wow, this looks great! Why have I never heard of it?"

    Oh, did I mention it supports Linux, 'doze and Mac out of the box?

    -------------

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  7. Re:Whee... by gedanken · · Score: 1

    Diablo was originally based on nethack, the designers have admitted this.

    so here is a new linux version of that, Gnomehack:

    http://www.xmission.com/~andersen/erik/gnomehack /gnomehack.html

  8. Re:Diablo II is mindless by Donavan · · Score: 1

    If a game has no challange then it's NOT going to be played long by many people. It doens't have to be chessmaster to be challenging.

    I found Diablo to get really boring really fast and now that i've learned that Diablo II is more of the same I'll skip it. Diablo II has huge advance sales I wonder how much it will get as reccomendations from players?

    My question is why did something that's basicly an expansion pack take so long to release? And then release with a massive amount of crash bugs?

  9. Re:Better, Free, Open-Source Alternatives to Diabl by jazzyfox · · Score: 1

    Actually, this is why I like Diablo/Diablo2. I love nethack, adom, etc. I play Rogue on my Palm. The thing that initially interested me about Diablo was the very nethack-ness of it. Combine the real-time and graphics with the multiplayer aspects, and you do have something that isn't just a re-packaging of the originals.

  10. Re:No thanks, I'll stick to Vampire by Harlequin · · Score: 1

    I agree. I think vampire has the opportunity (with all the java scripting) to be very cool. I've done a couple NPC re-skins so far, but I haven't had time (damn work) to get into changing game mechanics and disciplines.

    BTW, currently (6:50PM PST) the highest bid on a ebay collectors edition Diablo 2 is $99. Someone put one up for $250 but noone's buying. Personally, I think it's silly to spend an extra $50 on the "collector's edition". Sure, I bought the collector's Vampire: tM-R, but it was only like $8 more for the pre-order.

    If you can't get it in the store, just wait, they'll make more :). I may pick it up off the cheap rack, but probably not, I didn't think Diablo 1 was all that great (and the beta didn't convince me otherwise about Diablo 2).

  11. NAT/Firewall info use - Port 4000 by madstork2000 · · Score: 2

    This is probably obvisous to most, but it took me a while to track down (mainly because blizzard sites has been sllloowww!

    If your getting tired of battlenet crashes, "private" games can be set up on the net, if you have a NAT box you need to open/redirect PORT 4000 to the "host" computer. We played till 5am without a single crash! For hosting a game on battle.net you'll need to also open up 6112 through 6119 (both TCP/UDP). This info is from the FAQ on blizzards site.

    Negative, is our characters don't show up on the ladder, but it was nice quality time with my brothers. . .

    BTW, Necromancers rule. I love having a clay thug to beat up evil demons while I watch.

    -MS2k

  12. Why, Blizzard, why? by matt1318 · · Score: 2

    Ugh! Warcraft 1, and 2. Starcraft. Diablo. Now D2. When will Blizzard finally wake up and push for a simultaneous Mac/Windows release date? It used to be that they'd use the Mac version as a little extra profit boost after the fact, but now with the advent of the iMac and the crushingly fast G4, why can't Blizzard acknowledge the Mac as a legitimate gaming platform? Don't give me the FUD about Windows' user base, the Mac user base right now on June 29, 2000 is such that Blizzard could stand to make a nice profit given the obvious popularity of the windows stress test. if they had really wanted to win the hearts of all the gamers out there, they would have gotten in bed with Loki way back to get this thing out for Windows, Mac, and Linux all at once. I hereby pledge undying loyalty to any game company that can accomplish that.

    1. Re:Why, Blizzard, why? by Refrag · · Score: 1

      Undying loyalty?

      Have you bought Unreal Tournament yet?

      Refrag

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
    2. Re:Why, Blizzard, why? by Golias · · Score: 2
      if they had really wanted to win the hearts of all the gamers out there, they would have gotten in bed with Loki way back to get this thing out for Windows, Mac, and Linux all at once. When a game is more than a year behind schedule, you get it out the door - fast. Simultanious development can often push release dates back, and given that Diablo II is "old school" compared to the EQ/UO/AC trend as it is, they could ill-afford to delay even longer just to make a handful of Mac and Linux zealots happy.

      1.5 million pre-orders, baby! Are there even 1.5 million iMacs out there yet?

      Disclaimer: I love the Mac and do stuff at my G3 every day. I'm just a realist about gaming markets. My advice, keep doing your Photoshop and Dreamweaver on that Mac of yours, and pick up a cheap PC for a gaming console (and a second one for a *n[iu]x firewall, while you are at it).

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  13. Re:if only... by Yunzil · · Score: 1

    It checked for 3dfx glide during install too.

  14. Re:if only... by webrunner · · Score: 1

    A good portion of the stuff is done server side now, so it's much much much harder, if not impossible to use a trainer of any use,.
    ----
    Oh my god, Bear is driving! How can this be?

    --
    ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
  15. Re:Well then it's no fun by Phredrick+Dobbs · · Score: 1

    I presume that was a troll, but I am replying anyway. I have always been of the opinion that it is much more fun to be a low level character and work your way up. Just like in D&D (roleplaying geek alert!), its actually more fun IMHO to play a low level character most of the time. (Thats the first time I've ever used IMHO! ACK!)

    -Phredrick Dobbs
    Emperor of the Universe
    Grand and High Protector of Everything

    --

    -Phredrick Dobbs
    Emperor of the Universe
    Grand and High Protector of Everything
  16. Re:Games are for losers by Dreamweaver · · Score: 2

    Diablo II is no more the same game than the might and magic games are all the same, or any other series games that actually keep a consistent game play style (unlike, say, final fantasy).

    I for one am overjoyed that diablo II is sprite based. It seems like every game that comes out anymore is 3d, and personally i think sprites look Much better. They're pre-rendered so you don't have to worry about polygon counts, you can have way more frames of animation with less hardware usage, you can have more variety since sprites are nowhere near as big as 3d meshes, and i for one think the un-antialiased, low-poly, flat textured look of 3d games is just plain ugly.

    And as for linear.. yeah, diablo and diablo II are linear.. so are pretty much all games to one extent or another. I like non-linear games as much as the next guy, but i like novels too.. and a well made, linear game can be just as involving as a linear novel.

    But i digress. Different strokes for different folks and all. I like sprite-based graphics, i like diablo's gameplay, i like its multi-player (though i really prefer single player most of the time), and given the sales of the games apparently alot of people agree. That doesn't make me 'right', but don't slam the game for not being your cup of tea.


    Dreamweaver

    --


    "If a man hasn't discovered something he will die for, he isn't fit to live" -- MLK, Jr.
  17. Re:Well then it's no fun by Yunzil · · Score: 1

    As opposed to the game being no challenge at all?

  18. Re:No thanks, I'll stick to Vampire by webrunner · · Score: 1

    The collectors edition comes with a DVD of the ingame cinematics and a copy of the AD&D Diablo rulebook (which you can buy seperately)

    ----
    Oh my god, Bear is driving! How can this be?

    --
    ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
  19. Million Mac User March by matt1318 · · Score: 1

    Yes! Thank you!
    Hey, is Blizzard HQ anywhere near Redmond? If so we can head over there after we're done with MS. Are you going to be joining us?

  20. Re:Doesn't work with Kenwood drives... by seebs · · Score: 2

    The "problem" you are encountering is probably a result of one of the popular anti-piracy CD hacks, which are incompatible with some drives. They put these in because most retail stores will order fewer (or no) copies of a game that doesn't have some kind of copy protection good enough to stop casual users.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  21. Someone's not been doing their GiS homework. by Inoshiro · · Score: 4

    " I'm a level 10 Sorceress named CmdrTaco"

    Now, we all know that some of the beta testers were supposed to get "CmdrTaco," "CmdrTac0," and all other variations on the spelling so that our good friend, Rob Malda, would have to register as George Washington an yet another online service.

    Tsk!
    ---

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Someone's not been doing their GiS homework. by MJN222 · · Score: 1

      First off let me say that I have not yet picked up my copy of Diablo 2, but I was a "stress tester". It was my understanding that at the end of the stress test the characters were going to be erased and everything was going to start fresh. Meaning, we couldn't keep using our level 15 Barbarians anymore. I assume that this is because ST users would have an unfair advantage over newcomers. Odds are that all the variations _were_ gone, but were erased when everything was reset.

      --
      ---- Yay! I have a sig!
  22. The Patch... by Danse · · Score: 5

    Apparently the patch is rather critical as it fixes several serious (i.e. they'll crash your box) bugs that must have somehow sneaked past the QA team. This is according to Computer Games Online. They have a short article on "first impressions" of the game in the "Quick Takes" section today.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    1. Re:The Patch... by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      The Software, Etc. where I picked my game up today (Cedar Falls, Iowa) opened my box in front of me, as they did everyone else's.

      I think what I would do in that situation is say:

      "You know, I've decided I don't accept the license for this software, so I want to return it since I haven't opened it."

      --

    2. Re:The Patch... by Sethb · · Score: 3

      The Software, Etc. where I picked my game up today (Cedar Falls, Iowa) opened my box in front of me, as they did everyone else's. Apparently they received several copies that only had two of the three CD's inside. They were missing the Cinematics disc. Thankfully, my copy had all three CD's. Did anyone else experience this, or are the guys at my store smoking crack?
      ---

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
    3. Re:The Patch... by Kowh · · Score: 1

      Patch also wipes out single player games supposedly, so patch before you start a single player game (or just play multiplayer, the game's the same on or offline :)).

    4. Re:The Patch... by Mitaphane · · Score: 1

      The Software, Etc. where I picked my game up today (Cedar Falls, Iowa) opened my box in front of me, as they did everyone else's. Apparently they received several copies that only had two of the three CD's inside. They were missing the Cinematics disc. Thankfully, my copy had all three CD's. Did anyone else experience this, or are the guys at my store smoking crack?

      Yeah, I know of a friend who had a disc missing. They must of been in a rush to get D2 out the door, my copy had 2 instruction booklets in the Collector's Edition Box

  23. Re:Sorceress? by Darth · · Score: 1
    It is not a MMORPG.

    if it holds true to the multiplayer stress test, the max number of characters in a world at a time is 5 (i think. i'm not at home so i cant check).

    anyway....this is not competing with UO, Everquest, AC, etc.

    it's closer to competing with Neverwinter Nights and Vampire.

    --
    Darth --
    Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
  24. What's that? The wind... by Cabana · · Score: 1

    I was wondering by the office was so empty today...and now I know.

  25. Re:if only... by RAruler · · Score: 1

    VMWARE, if you can deal with the speed decreases

    --

    --
    Insert Witty Sig Here
  26. Also in today: Icewind Dale, by Interplay/Bioware by MattW · · Score: 2

    From Interplay and their studio, Black Isle, with an engine from Bioware, comes Icewind Dale, the latest AD&D RPG, a sort of follow up to Baldur's Gate and Tales of the Sword Coast (the expansion pack).

  27. Page to check out. by Lord+Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

    If you want info on Diablo II mechanics, go visit www.diabloii.net. Enjoy "May the force be with you Luke!"

  28. Re:Like Diablo 1 by polin8 · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they are, expansion release date #1 is set for 7/00 Postponed release #1 is set for 1/01 Postponed release #1 is set for 10/01 Postponed release #1 is set for 5/02 ... should see an expansion by the next presidential election.

  29. Re:Diablo II is mindless by ^Barret^ · · Score: 1
    It's not an expansion, its a sequel. You want to know why it's 640x480, because it was started 4 years ago when 640x480x16 was really nice.

    I mean, what about quake, gameplay for it hasnt changed since quake 3 and all they did for that was take out the gameplay part.

    Diablo II will be played for a long time, just like Diablo. The skill tree system makes for awesome char customizing. You can have all of your chars do something different. The game is great, even if the graphics look a bit dated. But then again, 2d probaly just dosent excite you.

    Oh well, I'll play D2

    -B

    --
    ~...Don't trade our love for Tea and Sympathy~ - Jars of Clay
  30. Now if linux was a mature gaming platform... by ^Barret^ · · Score: 1
    Then we would see more ports of games.

    I'm all for linux games, but linux just is not ready for games yet. Until linux gets a stable API for gaming, it's not going to happen. Sure you can use DRI (which, is a wonderful step in the right direction) but hardware support is lacking, although nVidia's drivers work very well on Q3.

    Stop complaining about not supportling linux games. Just face it, most games on linux suck ass. If i wanted to play Q3 at 15fps then I would use my P200.

    -B

    --
    ~...Don't trade our love for Tea and Sympathy~ - Jars of Clay
  31. Re:What do you expect by matt1318 · · Score: 1

    Oh good tao! They have to map the other buttons to the option and command keys! It might take a whole 5 minutes, if that! THANK you for showing WHY those companies always release Mac version so long after the PC versions.

  32. Re:if only... by lordmage · · Score: 2

    I was a stress tester and let me tell you, the servers would go down every day, constantly. battle.net was NOT a haven...

    Of course, first thing ya notice is a new patch out already.

    I saw CmdrTaco and said Hi... during the "Meltdown" he talks about. He went from level 10 to 8 for that crash he said. I did not seem to lose a darn thing. My wife did not either...

    So anyone got quick ways of getting perfect gems?

    AS TO The linux vs windows thing. I hate MS, but I have win98 on 2 of my 4 network computers.. It is very simple... the games are not out for linux yet, and when they do, I buy them. But until then, I gotta get my Age of Empires 2, Homeworld, Age of Wonders, Diablo 2 FIX... I jones for good games..

    I play HOMM3 on linux :)

    --
    I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
  33. Re:if only... by journey- · · Score: 1

    No. What he is saying is that if he buys windows games, then the demographics say 'well, we sold enough windows ones that we dont need to do a linux port, they all play it slowly through wine.' Whereas if he buys linux games, then those demographics start showing the people do buy games for linux, and there is a market. If nobody buys linux games, there will never be more.

  34. I just don't get it by Drog · · Score: 2
    I'm a huge Warcraft II and Starcraft fan. I think Blizzard is amazing for creating games which such incredibly well-thought-out, well-balanced gameplay. But no matter how hard I tried, I just couldn't understand why so many people, my friends and colleagues included, liked Diablo so much. It seemed that all I could do was run around dungeons and madly click on the bad guys. If it had had various types of attacks which depended on what key I was pressing (while madly clicking), at least then there would have been some skill involved. As it was, I was bored to tears. Granted, playing as a sorceror was MUCH more interesting than playing as a warrior. But as far as skill requirements goes, it wasn't even close to W2 and SC. And its role playing aspects were far inferior to other fantasy games like the Ultima and Wizardry series.

    So can someone please explain to me what exactly the appeal of Diablo is? What was the one thing that it did so incredibly well? And don't get mad--I'm by no means trying to ridicule those that liked Diablo, this is just the first game I've encountered in whicyh I genuinely can't understand the popularity.

    I really wonder if it would have been so popular if it hadn't been for the loyalty that fans had for Blizzard as a result of the huge success of Warcraft II.

    --

    Looking for political forums? Check out "The World Forum".

    1. Re:I just don't get it by Shin+Elendale · · Score: 1
      The answer is: Because it is. Believe me, its not for everyone. One of my pals hates Diablo 1 with a passion (tho he's hooked on 2) and can't understand why people play it. Actually, no one can. I've debated countless times about why it is fun, but there is no answer. Blizzard struck something fun, and they are sticking with it.

      -Elendale (Actually, building a character that can rape hundreds and hundreds of demons DOES sound kinda appealing...)

      --

      IANAT (I Am Not A Troll)

    2. Re:I just don't get it by graikor · · Score: 1

      I can't claim to speak for anyone else, but I enjoyed the shallow RPG format - I could play for a bit and walk away, and still feel like I accomplished something in the game.

      There were no puzzles so complex that they required a cheat guide, the monsters, weapons, and spells got better and/or more impressive as you progressed in the game, and besides, it reminded me of Dungeon of Doom, an old Mac game (Rogue clone) I used to love.

      You want to ask about an inexplicably popular game - what about Myst? Ooh, a pretty slide-show!

  35. Re:No thanks, I'll stick to Vampire by yomahz · · Score: 1
    You gotta be kidding me. I thought that the mulitplayer is a joke in V:TM! Most of the time, there is no structure w/ a ST that is just spitting out a monster here or there and handing out weapons and XP like candy.

    All of the characters hacn't been built up properly so it's no fun. It's like D1 when everyone was cheating!
    --

    A mind is a terrible thing to taste.

    --
    "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
  36. if only... by KarmaHo · · Score: 1

    ...they've removed the ability to cheat like one could in Diablo I. Then I might just have to play this beast.

    1. Re:if only... by MadAndy · · Score: 2
      I was in the beta-test, and was curious about this too. But soon after starting the solution they've taken immediately becomes apparent: *everything* goes through their servers.

      For example, if you click on an item in your inventory, there's a noticeable delay as (presumably) their server is contacted to verify the action. Then there's another delay when you drop the item in its new location.

      In addition, you can only play online with special 'secure' characters, every facet of which is also controlled by the server. With all items and characters being controlled centrally like this, I'd say it will be very difficult to fabricate your own mega-magic items or characters, since none of this information is actually authoritatively stored on your own PC.

    2. Re:if only... by Jeff+Nelson · · Score: 1

      By the way, Diablo II uses either DirectDraw or Direct3D, which fairly quickly rules out WINE. Would be nice, though.

    3. Re:if only... by Sludge · · Score: 2

      It's a tossup for me: do I wait to see if the expoits continue in the sequel, or do I rush out and buy it so I can play before the cheats come out?

      Oh what, Windows only, you say? Cough. I don't pay money to reboot.

    4. Re:if only... by Golias · · Score: 2
      And that strategy has worked so well for Mac Zealots, I'm sure their fantastic success will be repeated with Linux.

      Seriously, if you want to see more Linux games, then you had better hope that Linux market share goes way up, because the game companies will always run with the herd.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:if only... by einstein · · Score: 1

      That was a big issue when they were developing the game. they fixed it by storing your character information on the battle.net server, so no more duping or hacking of your inventory. hopefully they fixed it. I never ran into anyone during the beta who has cheating, (to my knowledge anyway :)

    6. Re:if only... by SEAL · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone ever managed to decrypt the character files in Diablo 1. In-memory editors were used to hack the characters while you were playing the game.

    7. Re:if only... by Sludge · · Score: 2

      There's a bit of a political issue. I'm only interested in supporting games that run under Linux with my hard earned dollar. This way, I can play Linux games in the future. This is common sense and logical in theory, but in reality, it takes some actual willpower.

      I will warez and borrow Windows-only games, and purchase them when they become available under Linux.

    8. Re:if only... by Pemdas · · Score: 1
      decode the file format then hack your char to your heart's content" like in Diablo 1.

      Actually, I never saw a hack for the file format for Diablo 1. All the hacks I saw dealt with the character information after it was loaded into memory, where it was stored, presumably, in an unencrypted state.

      Did anyone else ever see a true file hack? My impression was that Blizzard did a pretty good job of sercuring the char files, unfortunately, the whole chain-weak-link thing is ESPECIALLY true with security.

    9. Re:if only... by technos · · Score: 2

      The only political issue would be the purchase of Windows to run the game; The game companies could care what platform they wrote the game for, as long as they could sell it.

      Using Wine to keep cash out of the pockets of Gates & Company is not poiltical. It's the right thing to do.. Pirating Win32 games does nothing to improve the situation, it's just wrong.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    10. Re:if only... by colinm1981 · · Score: 2

      Well, there were about 100,000 testers in the stress test, and as far as I know none of them figured out how to cheat... I'd say this game is fairly cheat-proof if you ask me. All your character info is stored server-side rather than client-side, so it's not a matter of "decode the file format then hack your char to your heart's content" like in Diablo 1.

      -colin

      --
      -Colin
    11. Re:if only... by technos · · Score: 2

      WINE

      Seriously.. I'd betcha WINE runs it..

      CmdrTaco?!?
      Cowboy Neil?!?!
      Someone cycle their dual-Xeon back into Linux and check for us!

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    12. Re:if only... by slycer · · Score: 1

      I had the stress test beta loading in WINE..
      Did not connect to battlenet though, it appears as though all the blizzard games have the same problem. Will probably run in WINE, but will not connect battlenet. Single player probably though.

    13. Re:if only... by pussy-cow · · Score: 1

      you [we] have to do more.

      damnit, I wish I was a programmer.

      I cannot even get passed the 16th page in Learning Perl.

      damnit, damnit, damnit.

  37. Re:The *real* reason by Solaristrum · · Score: 1

    Glad to see that Slashdot has seen a decline in productivity that parallels my own. Since getting the game yesterday lunchtime I have been trying to not get caught playing in my office (fast connection) whilst building my array of characters.

    BTW CmdrTaco's choice of playing a female is not that unreasonable. If you want to use magic then there is not male magic user so a woman you must become. Of course, this only adds to the net history of men assuming women's identities, but that is another story.

    See you on Battle.net

    --
    Solaristrum: One who has spent way too long staring at the Sun
  38. Er, what is diablo 2? by maugt · · Score: 1

    You don't say and there's no link.... we're not all psychic you know.

    1. Re:Er, what is diablo 2? by technos · · Score: 3

      A kick ass multiplayer video game, the sucessor to Diablo.. Basically you run around in a dungeon trying to kill "Diablo"s current incarnation.. The graphics were (are?) a bit cheesy, reminding me of Fallout2. But the orig rocked my ass off, and this one will too! Get yerself a copy and enjoy calling in sick fer the next three days!!

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    2. Re:Er, what is diablo 2? by technos · · Score: 2

      I'm assuming you're a techie.

      You would love it!! The pay is substandard, the hours are longish, but when was the last time you got to play video games on a half million dollar machine?? Or take a $90,000 Compaq home for the week to make sure it was 'up to snuff'?? Or do things to a powered S80 that would make hardened IBM engineers blush? Or juggle $150,000 processor plates from an IBM 370 mainframe?

      Nuff said.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    3. Re:Er, what is diablo 2? by Requiem · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Once you get past the ascii graphics, it's one of the more addictive games out there.

    4. Re:Er, what is diablo 2? by tringstad · · Score: 1

      Get yerself a copy and enjoy calling in sick fer the next three days!!

      I would hate your job. Having to call in sick just to get a weekend of gaming in.

      --
      "I got a half gallon of Jack, and 2 dozen Ant Traps. I'm about to get wild." -me
    5. Re:Er, what is diablo 2? by Signal+10 · · Score: 1

      Dood... i don't get your sig... i watched it for like, 20 minutes! Nothing happened!

      --
      -o Disclaimer: You smell like shit, so does your mother, and I fuck her up the ass every day. o-
    6. Re:Er, what is diablo 2? by SirSteveH · · Score: 1

      Actually it was modelled more after Moria.. and Moria has many more items and many more monsters and many more characters and many more spells...yadda yadda yadda then both Diablo2 and Nethack put together.

  39. Re:Only Collector's Edition for me. by DarkKnight · · Score: 1

    Note that us foreigners don't get a look in as Blizzard decided to do an exclusive deal with Electronics Boutique, so exclusive that its Australian branch could not get copies of the collected edition.

    I had an order through Chips and Bits website but they did not receive any due to this exclusive deal.

    I would have ordered from EB's site if they had a sensible shipping rate to Australia, $50US flat rate granted this is probably per shipment.

    Yeesh. Guess I'll settle for the standard edition. Once again the rest of the world comes off second best to the US.

    Rant over.

    --
    /* Andrew Fong - rogue programmer */
  40. Re:Doesn't work with Kenwood drives... by Jeff+Nelson · · Score: 1
    The full install does not require you to swap cds, BUT... BUT.. here is an excerpt from the readme..
    Hard Drive Space: The Single Player installation requires 600 MB free space on your hard drive. The Multiplayer installation requires 900 MB free space on your hard drive. The Full installation requires 1.4 GB free space on your hard drive.
  41. Where is everyone? by Vishak · · Score: 1

    I think everyone rushed to a computer store when they saw this article. All I see are trolls replying.

    --
    Intelligent Design Theory is not Creationism
    1. Re:Where is everyone? by Xenith · · Score: 1

      Yea, sorry, I was out shopping. No worries though, I'm back! (yea, this is my first post, so sue me ;-) Just to tie this post in with the subject..... I forgot to preorder! (ok, so I'm lazy, sue me again)

      Never argue with a fool. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

      --

      Never argue with a fool. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
      -Xenith
    2. Re:Where is everyone? by mllenerd · · Score: 1

      I will cross oceans of time to find you....

      --

      --

      --
      The geeks shall inherit the earth.
    3. Re:Where is everyone? by Vishak · · Score: 1

      hehehe

      --
      Intelligent Design Theory is not Creationism
  42. Re:What about support for Windows NT 4.0? by Jeff+Nelson · · Score: 1
    From the readme:
    Operating System: Diablo II is a Windows 95/98/2000/NT game that utilizes Microsoft DirectX. Diablo II will run under DirectX 6.1 or higher, but we recommend updating to DirectX version 7.0a. You may install DirectX 7.0a using the Diablo II Installer.
    There you have it.
  43. The Patch (was Re:URLs) by stickyc · · Score: 1

    It's worth noting that the patch came out several days ago. I can't think of another time when the patch was actually released ahead of the project (in the games biz, anyhow). What does that say about game S/W development?

    1. Re:The Patch (was Re:URLs) by SEAL · · Score: 1

      There's usually a couple week span between the time a game is "done" internally, and the time it hits store shelves.

      All this says, is that Blizzard was pressed to ship this thing, but they decided to take advantage of those extra couple weeks. You try not to do that, but it's sort of like a little extra insurance (to help avoid situations like Ultima 9)...

    2. Re:The Patch (was Re:URLs) by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      Wheel of Time had the patch out first as well

  44. CmdrTaco?? by Spazmoid · · Score: 2

    I always new you had that crossdressing side! When are we gonna hook up?
    I could see you and hemos in sequined dresses at the next Linux Expo!
    #include caffiene.c

  45. Some merchant I am... :) by babbage · · Score: 1
    "...Diablo 2 arrived at Babbages today..."

    ...and I don't even like computer games, aside from maybe Tetris or Freecell or Dope Wars, but hey whatever you kids wanna buy, I'll sell it to ya! hahaha



  46. Fry's has/had it.. for those on the west coast. by Xzzy · · Score: 1

    Or, at least, it was there when I was picking up a few new hubs for the suits around lunch time. ;) They (they being the store I went to in Sunnyvale) had a fairly large display filled with the game, so if you get there soon enough after work closes this evening, you can prolly get lucky. Game *was* going fast, though, so unless you got lucky, it's prolly too late.

  47. Releases by veldrane · · Score: 1

    Not to knock the Prey team but I thought I heard once that the sequel to Prey was released before the original (which isn't out yet, is it?)

    Could someone clarify that for me?

    -Vel

  48. Re:Availability by Hackboy · · Score: 2

    How likely is it that people who didn't preorder will get a copy? Should I even bother to try yet, or should I wait for the next pressing or what ever of CD's?

    My roommate ran over to CompUSA (Austin, TX) and picked up two copies earlier this afternoon. He said that they had plenty left. YMMV

  49. Re:Availability by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

    sure - the house of evil -aka fry's- got the regular edition on the shelves mid day today

    if you want one of the 70000 collectors editions, i beleive that they were all presold - picked mine up yesterday. i hear its going for $100+ over cost on ebay already.

    anyway, you probably ought to pick up your phone book and call first, unless you are just looking for an excuse to go to the store anyway.

    good luck

    --
    The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  50. Diablo III by Tulsa+T+Nawi · · Score: 1

    How much you want to bet we wont see a Diablo III till 2010?

    --
    --- Tulsa T. Nawi, On Display @ Shattered.com
  51. Diablo 1.5 sucks by briancarnell · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I like spending $50 for a game and then constantly getting an "insert CD message" just because the assholes who make the game hate their customers so much that they use a subchannel protection scheme that screws over a significant portion of users.

    And once I finally got a hacked version that didn't have this problem, I'm playing it for a few hours thinking "this is what they spent the last three years working on?"

    They should have called it Diablo 1.5 and released it a year and a half ago. Then it would have been a good game. I'm returning my copy and checking out IWD.

  52. Re:Network play by etrepum · · Score: 1

    TCP = bad for network play.

    TCP always sends packets in order, and doesnt drop any packets. If a packet is lost, its resent, and you have to just sit there and wait.

    UDP has no error control. If it gets through, it gets through, if not, its lost. The packets are in no guaranteed order. It might sound bad, but TCP is much worse for real time gaming.

  53. and I thought I was alone... by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

    To me, 3D just isn't believable in a fantasy setting. I've never seen a 3d fantasy game that looked convincing as a fantasy setting. 3d works in a scifi setting but for some reason a warlock/wizard/skeleon etc. looks better as a well drawn sprite.

    And, D2, it's cool. I like it. Not the graphics really, though they are pretty good for sprite-based animations. it's more the atmosphere. The music is pretty good too, reminds me of my old Castlevania days.

    1. Re:and I thought I was alone... by BJH · · Score: 1


      Try Myth II. That looked pretty good for a 3D game...

  54. Re:Where is everyone? Playing, obviously. by Golias · · Score: 2
    I got this game last night, and the name "Golias" is already taken on BattleNet! I mean, how weird of a name does a guy have to use to keep it unique!?

    I logged in a HeMightBeDave instead.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  55. Re:Better, Free, Open-Source Alternatives to Diabl by Quintin+Stone · · Score: 1
    Would you care to explain how those were "made real-time"?

    Besides the fact that the games you describe aren't multiplayer, they're just not that interesting to look at. And this is coming from a guy who just spent a month playing Moria from work at slow times. So it's not that I don't like the old games, but they're really not in the same league.

    --

    "Prejudice is wrong; you should hate everyone the same."

  56. Re:Whee... by cduffy · · Score: 1

    SDL's well worth the bother (not that I've ever had any bother with it). Trust me. Particularly if you're a developer. Even if you have to compile SDL from source yourself, it's not too hard (ain't autoconf grand?)

    Indeed, given the trouble it sounds like you've been having, it's probably well worth installing from source. You can find it at www.libsdl.org, btw.

  57. Re:Also in today: Icewind Dale, by Interplay/Biowa by Refrag · · Score: 1

    What improvements does Icewind Dale have over Baldur's Gate? I know it uses BG's engine, but I'm hoping some improvements were made to the engine as well. If enough were made, I may get Icewind Dale.

    Refrag

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  58. Re:Doesn't work with Kenwood drives... by Sethb · · Score: 2

    That seems pretty stupid, considering they already have the unique CD-Keys for copy-protection.

    Any retailer dumb enough to not want to sell a TON of Diablo II copies because of a lack of Copy Protection is only short-changing themselves.

    In the tiny town of Cedar Falls, Iowa, Software, Etc. had 175 copies pre-ordered. I can't imagine the volumes sold in many bigger markets. Of course, this pales in comparison with the pre-orders of some consoles and their titles.
    ---

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  59. Re:So what about PK's? by shuffler · · Score: 1

    You have to be level 9 or above to declare hostility, so newbies under level 9 can not be attacked by other players.

  60. Network play by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    The one thing that has sucked about network gaming for years and years is the dogged persistence programmers seem to have in using UDP for transmitting information.
    My school (among others, I'm sure) blocks UDP and so I can never, ever, EVER play a network game on the Internet through my BROADBAND connection which is MORE than capable of handling the excess traffic produced by TCP headers. Pisses me off. There should be an option not to use it.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Network play by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know - but I CAN'T use UDP. Our fscking firewall blocks it. I don't suppose there's any kind of TCP wrapper for UDP you've heard of that works with Diablo/II, is there?

      --

      +++ATH0
  61. Also.... about gems by yomahz · · Score: 1
    You can find "Gem Shrines" which will upgrade a gem in your inventory which makes it more powerful. There's like 4 or 5 different levels ranging from chipped to perfect.

    Only weapons, sheilds, and helmets are socketed for gems. Some can hold up to 3 gems.

    There's also some new armor (sash, boots) slots in inventory (at least I don't remember them being in D1).
    --

    A mind is a terrible thing to taste.

    --
    "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
  62. Diablo II is mindless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Diablo II is a boring, primitive and crude hack of an online game. There are hundreds of MUDs with more advanced gameplay 5 years ago then Diablo II/2 has after 4 years of development. I would rather be playing a text based MUD then diablo II (which is in 640x480). Atleast it would be challenging and stimulating.

    These dumbed down types of games will continue to persist due to the majority of people never having the opportunity to play a challenging online RPG. Let's face it, Diablo II is nothing but a competition of collecting the best equip and most experience. And that is determined by how much time you spend mind numbingly attacking the same monsters over and over again.

    Don't waste your time playing Diablo II/2.


    Kevin Landstrop Senior Blizzard Marketing Director

    1. Re:Diablo II is mindless by jidar · · Score: 1

      yeah yeah.. blah blah blah...

      translation: Im an old fuddy duddy.

      --
      Sigs are awesome huh?
    2. Re:Diablo II is mindless by Vanguard(DC) · · Score: 1

      "You want to know why it's 640x480, because it was started 4 years ago when 640x480x16 was really
      nice."

      wow. i guess i was ahead of my time... I've been using 800x600 and 1024x768 since 95... and most games have used atleast 800x600 since then...
      When diamond stealth 3d pro cards rocked!

      "I mean, what about quake, gameplay for it hasnt changed since quake 3 and all they did for that was take out the gameplay part."

      -huh?

      but i agree with part, D2 looks great!

      Vanguard

      "to each his own, but ill take mine with KDE and an order of shells!"

      --
      "I think, therefore I get paid."
  63. Get that patch! by bswick · · Score: 4

    Apparently the patch can, in some cases, ruin your single player save game. Patch early.

  64. Re:URLs by M$+Mole · · Score: 1

    A note on the patch, it has been reported that it may delete your single-player characters when you apply it. GO HERE for the story on the patch. I've heard the problem is intermittent...and besides...who plays Diablo in SP anyway?

    --
    Karma: Non-existant. Due mostly to the fact that you smell funny and nobody likes you.
  65. The *real* reason by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 2

    Aha! Now we know the real reason Slashdot has been so flaky the past day or so....

    b7

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
  66. Re:Only Collector's Edition for me. by sqlrob · · Score: 1
    I wasted four good days trying to call in (since you couldn't order it online) to their sales dept and I never got any further than a busy signal. A least they could have taken online pre-orders...this isn't 1996 after all.

    Huh? I had mine preordered for months (ebworld)

  67. Macintosh Release by blueg3 · · Score: 2

    Oh no! You mean I have to wait until Q3 to get my copy? Everyone's going to be high-level by then. (Even worse, they might get tired of the game.)

    Hopefully the insanity will have died down in time for the Macintosh release.

    It would be nice if companies actually started releasing Mac and PC versions simultaneously. I guess that would be too much to ask though, right? Oh well, back to my Alpha Centauri.

  68. Re:So, why is CmdrTaco playing a sorceress? by klund · · Score: 1
    Damn it. My DSL won't be ready for anotehr four weeks, at least. And the network at the office blocks UDP. God damn, I feel left out!

    I read somewhere on the battle.net support forums that the network code in Diablo 2 uses TCP, so maybe that's fixed. (I can't find the reference right now because their search page is broken...) I look forward to trying to play multiple machines over my cable modem, using my Netgear Gateway Router (RT311).

    In Diablo, if you and a friend, running over the same connection (using a single IP address and NAT) joined the same game, you couldn't see each other. Other players (on other connections) could see both of you, but it was like you were playing in different games. Monsters I killed didn't die in her game, etc.

    I hope this is fixed in Diablo 2. Note to game developers: Many of us run behind NAT! Use TCP or die!
    --

    --
    My word processor was written by Stanford Professor Donald Knuth. Who wrote yours?
  69. Re:So, why is CmdrTaco playing a sorceress? by Golias · · Score: 2
    But when a woman has a name like "CmdrTaco", it inspires a lot of crude lesbian jokes doesn't it?

    (Or maybe my perspective is a little warped because I rented Chasing Amy again last week...)

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  70. And well I'm at it by xmatt1 · · Score: 1

    It is nice to see Rob and the Gang supporting the Linux version(s) of these popular games by going right out and contributing their $50 to the windows version sales, then promptly booting up That Other OS and helping to overload Blizzard's servers. Glad to see you've got integrity, guys.

  71. Re:Also in today: Icewind Dale, by Interplay/Biowa by MattW · · Score: 1

    I hadn't yet installed it when I wrote that (I had just gotten back from the mad dash to buy it). The engine seems almost identical. Some differences I've noticed: (1) Walking speed now 50% faster. Whew. That was the most annoying thing about BG. (2) Loading/Saving faster, but loading puts you into a "character maintenance" screen (to like, drop people from your party) instead of into the game directly, so loading isn't really faster. But saving is. Otherwise, things seem the same. Of course, there's more level/spells/etc. Oh, and they slowed down the rate of fire on missile weapons, probably a good idea since a whole party armed with slings and arrows could mow down anything before it got near them.

  72. Re:Doesn't work with Kenwood drives... by Dark-Helmet · · Score: 1

    Oh Oh Oh, you think that's bad? ;)

    Try having 2.6gigs of Baldur's Gate madness on your hard drive for the past few weeks/months. I can't wait for BG 2 personally, THAT will be a kickass RPG. The storyline and quests of BG were the best I've seen.

  73. Two words by Golias · · Score: 2

    Dual

    Boot

    Almost all Linux users also use MICROS~1 boxes. Get over it and move on with your life.

    I'm a freakin' Macintosh bigot, and I have two Windows systems (one of which is about to become a SCO UNIX box), a Linux PC, a G3 that boots into OS8.6 and LinuxPPC, and an old PowerBook Duo that I take everywhere and beat the hell out of.

    Some of us have grown up a little from the days of Holy Wars and just want to use the best tool for the job. When the best tool is Linux, that is what I will use.

    If M$ wants to charge me a C-Note for their OS, and I want to play a game that runs on their OS, I will buy it. You can scream all you want about how I'm not 31337 enough because I'm not a "pure" FSF freak, but I really don't give a crap.

    Here endeth the rant.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  74. Virtual Drive 2000 by Angron · · Score: 1

    Though I've yet to get a copy of Diablo 2 (sold out too damn quick :), I played around with Far Stone Tech's Virtual Drive 2000 Personal Edition and found that it worked great for the original Diablo, which also reads nearly everything from the CD. I'd assume it will work just as well for Diablo2. Price for a single computer license is about $35.

  75. Re:So what about PK's? by ryoma · · Score: 1

    yes, there is a "hostile mode" now, and you get a warning when someone is approaching in hostile mode. You can only go hostile in town, and town portals disappear for them. also, you don't have the option to go hostile until you are at least level 9.

    ryoma
    http://dreaming.sempai.org

  76. Gender probably wasn't a factor by Angron · · Score: 1
    Diablo isn't a MMORPG since games are continually created (and ended) and the max. players per game is eight.

    Unlike many MMORPG's, which offer each race/class in both sexes, Diablo's character classes specify whether you will be male or female. There is no 'sorceror' counterpart to the sorceress, so (assuming she was chosen for her spellcasting abilities) Taco probably just wanted to cast some kickass spells...

  77. Where is the DVD edition? by Refrag · · Score: 1

    Why did Blizzard only release Diablo 2 on 3 CD's? DVD-ROM drives are probably on 95% of all new computers. I'm not so sure I want to get it on 3 CD's... swap, swap, swap. I'd rather just have a DVD.

    Refrag

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
    1. Re:Where is the DVD edition? by Refrag · · Score: 1

      What is your point? I didn't say Blizzard should release Diablo 2 exclusively on DVD-ROM. Of course it should also be available on CD-ROM for people of your... kind. :)

      At any rate, Diablo 2 for the Macintosh went gold over the weekend. Blizzard expects it to hit the shelves by the end of July.

      ...and I bought Diablo on 3 CD-ROMs... shame on me.

      Refrag

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  78. Re:So what about PK's? by Refrag · · Score: 1

    That's just a fact of Net-life. Get used to it. It's called Diablo 2, not Utopia 2.

    Refrag

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  79. Unfortunately by sheared · · Score: 1

    It's a shame that both Diablo II and Icewind Dale are being released at the same time. I think a lot of people that would otherwise find IWD incredibly entertaining will never see it. I for one will dedicate these next few weeks (months?) to building up all SIX of my IWD characters, and leave D2 for this fall (in that calm before Christmas).

    IWD isn't as pure a hack-n-slash as Diablo, but any D&D fan should check it out!

    http://www.interplay.com

  80. Better, Free, Open-Source Alternatives to Diablo2 by potsy2 · · Score: 5

    Instead of supporting Blizzard and their franchise, you could check out some great opensource projects that Blizzard basically repackaged, made real-time, added fancier graphics, and sold to Joe Consumer.

    Rogue is the grandaddy of everything. Including Diablo. See where it all began.

    Angband is my favorite Rogue-like. It has incredible depth, hundreds of monsters, and hundreds of magical items. #angband on Othernet usually has at least one developer in it.

    There are also a number of Angband variants such as Zangband and Pernband. Zangband even includes a multitude of quests, for those who like a little story-line to their dungeon crawls. These can all be found at the Angband link above. Graphical Tcl versions of Angband also exist, for the graphics-needy.

    Others include Nethack (a light-hearted, often humorous Rogue-like), ADOM , and Moria

    So, instead of marching to your local EB, why not download one of these (I heartily recommend Angband) free games and save the 40$ that Diablo 2 would cost you? You could even contribute to the project, play with the source, or add your own monsters, items, and spells. Have fun!

  81. Re:Whee... by jidar · · Score: 1

    In case you haven't noticed, tons of people start big ambititous software products in Linux, but nobody follows through. I frequent linuxgames.com and happypenguin.com but I'm sick and tired of reading about this or that new project when 90% of them go unfinished. I just wish someone would do a -mildy- ambitious game and finish it, something along the lines of dragonwarrior 1 for the nes or something...

    --
    Sigs are awesome huh?
  82. Re:Games are for losers by DustyHodges · · Score: 1

    Actually, as one of the beta stress testers, I can tell you it IS a signifigantly different game. It's a MUCH larger world, it has 3 new character classes, and it actually has a plot, with a backstory and the whole nine yards.

    All in all, Diablo II is a far superior game to the original, in graphics, sound, plot, playability, lack of cheats, and a whole slew of new abilities. I don't really remember alot of people complaining about Quake III because it was the same game as DOOM...

  83. Re:Second post by mllenerd · · Score: 1

    Grr! Stupid lameness filters.

    --

    --

    --
    The geeks shall inherit the earth.
  84. Re:So, why is CmdrTaco playing a sorceress? by kaphka · · Score: 2
    - He wants horny guys to give him free stuff.
    You know what really pisses me off about people who do that? It works. At least, it works in EverQuest... Diablo 2's graphics might be too primitive to trigger those protective instincts.

    I've wasted so much time and money helping out naked wood elves. I know they're all played by creepy middle-aged men, but... they're just so cute!
    --

    MSK

  85. Re:So, why is CmdrTaco playing a sorceress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The reason he chose this character is for the spell casting abilities of the Sorceress over other characters. There is no male sorcerer to choose, unless you count the necromancer. You should really check out this guide for characters (anyone who is playing), but be forewarned, this is based around the beta, so it may have changed for the normal game:

    Diablo2 Character Guide

    According to this, I'd choose the Sorceress for her skills and for her ass. Whoops.

  86. What about support for Windows NT 4.0? by martinde · · Score: 1

    One thing I couldn't find on the web pages is if there's 3d support in Windows NT. Any comments?

    1. Re:What about support for Windows NT 4.0? by DeeKayWon · · Score: 1

      NT4? Yes, according to Blizzard D2 site. 3D in NT4? Well, it's a D3D/Glide game, so only if you have a Voodoo.

  87. Doesn't work with Kenwood drives... by Sethb · · Score: 2

    If you look on the little yellow troubleshooting note that came with the game. It says "Some Kenwood drives may have problems, check out http://www.blizzard.com/support/ for the solution"

    Guess who has one of those Kenwood drives? Guess who can't install the game? There's no info there pertaining to the problem, and an e-mail to their tech support 4 hours ago hasn't produced a response yet.

    Meanwhile, I'm now installing the game from my CD-RW drive. It only writes at 2X, I'm hoping it reads faster than that, or that the full install doesn't use the CD much.

    If all else fails, I'm going to have to yank my Kenwood 52X and put in a DVD-ROM drive I brought home from work. I was a closed beta tester for this game, and I had the same problem then. Why didn't Blizzard fix this? No other CD has problems with my drive.
    ---

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
    1. Re:Doesn't work with Kenwood drives... by Zan+Thrax · · Score: 1

      I think after I get ahold of that nice 40G that's been saying my name every time I look at the Future Shop flyers, I'll devote my current 10G to BG & BG engine games... Should be full by the end of the year... BG w/ TSC & Torment now, that's a little more than 1/2 full, Icewind in a couple weeks will take it to 3/4 probably... hmmm. BG2 won't fit... so much for that plan...

      --

      Intolerant people should be shot.
    2. Re:Doesn't work with Kenwood drives... by Spire · · Score: 1

      That seems pretty stupid, considering they already have the unique CD-Keys for copy-protection.

      The unique CD key is required only for Battle.Net play, not single-player or even multi-player play via TCP/IP.

      Quite a few people (myself included) buy games like Diablo primarily for the single-player gameplay. Quite a few people pirate games like Diablo for the same reason, and they would not need a legitimate CD key to play single-player; a generated key (or a simple crack) would do just as well.

      --
      begin 644 .sig22&%I;"P@9F5L;&]W(&=E96 LA`end
    3. Re:Doesn't work with Kenwood drives... by Dreamweaver · · Score: 2

      I've had to do the same thing (install from cd-rw) because my 32x mitsumi died about a month ago and i don't game much. Apparently it *does* read from the cd fairly often as the game lags like mad when i move from one area to another.. though you've probably already discovered this.

      As a side note, if you think the game's not running when you start it from CD, just wait about 10 minutes.

      Anybody know of one of those cd emulation programs so i can just run it off my HD?
      Dreamweaver

      --


      "If a man hasn't discovered something he will die for, he isn't fit to live" -- MLK, Jr.
  88. Damn straight! by Benwick · · Score: 1

    I'm not getting Diablo 2 until they make it for my Palm III!

    Ben Chadwick - Editor, Zero Future/Post-Collegiate Malaise

  89. Pong today, gone tomorrow... by Benwick · · Score: 1

    Does anybody remember Wasteland? You're probably all too young to remember what is STILL one of the best RPGs ever written (and also credited with the introduction of NPC's). Not exactly a linear story, but rudimentary sprite-based graphics... The point is, graphics ain't shite. Nethack is better than 99% of the crap they've been spewing the last few years.

    Also, along the same lines, Britney Spears sucks. You might hear me go "wooo!" with my bare midriff shakin' at the Blood, Sweat & Tears concert though...

    Oops... I seem to have talked at more length than I intended... this age-22 old-timer does tend to ramble on.

    Ben Chadwick - Editor, Zero Future/Post-Collegiate Malaise

  90. Re:Here we go again.... by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

    There is a pretty good majority that want Windows only games in their own catagory

    First off, the tag line says, "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters". Diablo is a game very popular with "Nerds", hence the release of Diablo2 after so long a wait is definitely "News".

    Second: I've been reading Slashdot pretty religiously for the past 3 months now, and this article, along with the one posted when Diablo2 went Gold, are the only articles I can remember that dealt with a Windows only games. There have probably been a couple more I missed, but they are very few and far between.

    But most don't back up our words with our pocket books and rush out and buy games on the first day that will never see the light of day on anything else but Windows

    Well, good point: if you really want to see a Linux port of a game that badly, you should be willing to live without the game. But to me, that's taking things a little too seriously. I mean, it's a game: it's supposed to be fun. Why should I let a hatred of Windows keep me from some Diablo2 gaming goodness. And it is gaming goodness, chock full of creamy nouget and rich caramel. I just got done with a nice little 8 hour romp, and I can already tell this game is going to eat every spare minute of my life.

  91. Re:Games are for losers by eudas · · Score: 1

    jeez, that site asked me if i wanted to allow it to set a cookie like 20 times (literally!)... blah :/

    eudas

    --
    Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
  92. Re:Here we go again.... by cgori · · Score: 1

    *chuckle*

    A whole 3 months, eh? Welcome to the terrordome...

    Most of the people who are complaining about separate categories are the people who want fine-grained control over censoring JonKatz or any other semi-controversial topic that might trouble them from their busy days of composing slashdot/Everything2 articles.

    A side note to the complainers: Does anyone remember what the hell this place was like in 1998? Filtering? Are you kidding? It's supposed to be random-ass crap that someone may/may not think is interesting. If you don't like it, feel free to ignore it. It's not up to Rob to provide mechanisms for you to filter the "icky" stuff out of your daily reading. He did (and does) this because he thinks it's fun, and cool, nothing more, nothing less.

    [end of love-it-or-leave-it rant]

  93. Re:Do you have a mouse in your pocket? by garett_spencley · · Score: 1
    The reality is that Blizzard is one of the largest game companies out there, and sorry to say it but the fact that Blizzard is a BUSINESS means that judgement calls are made regarding what platforms to support and when.

    And they will never port to other platforms if there is no demand. If Linux users start installing windows on an extra hd just to play Diablo II then that reduces the damand for a Linux port. Why spend money and resources porting to a platform if the users of that platform are willing to switch over to the currently supported platform to play it???

  94. am I the only one who could care less about D2? by goateye · · Score: 1

    blah.. who cares... boo.. what is so great about this silly game? g

    1. Re:am I the only one who could care less about D2? by undertoad · · Score: 1

      No.

  95. My Problem With Diablo by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    The whole random dungeon layout thing really bothers me. While it technically adds 'infinite' variations for gameplay, I prefer to hack and slash in a dungeon or realm which has some semblance of coherency, history and intention behind it. Diablo is good at simulating this, but sometimes it's too damn easy to see the 'randomness' at work.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  96. Because I suck at complex games by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

    Simple. I suck at games that require 20 keys combinations to do anything. I grew up with Space Invaders, Donkey Kong and Gallager. One stick, one buton (Defender was to complex for me ;) ).

    Diablo is simple, Slash 'n Dash fun. No *real* skill required. I even managed to finish it.

    Anyway I have just started playing Baulders Gate. I will send an update in a couple of years once I finish...

    b

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
  97. In Russia too by Klaus+von+Altdorf · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I saw the 3 disk sets of Diablo II here in St. Petersburg for 160-180 rubles (approx. $6). Gonna give it a try.

  98. Re:Better, Free, Open-Source Alternatives to Diabl by DuckIE · · Score: 1

    Why, yes. There is a multiplayer version of Angband, the Tolkein-themed Roguelike variant. On the web at mangband.org

    --
    -- The Theorem Theorem: "If if, then then."
  99. No thanks, I'll stick to NetHack by namlhaz · · Score: 1

    [No sarcasm below, even if implied by posting style and mimicry of previous poster]
    I dunno if it's just me, but after a while these attempts to make RPG type games look "modern" just get boring for me. I think I'll just stick to NetHack 3.3.0 (tho I do hope they release the 'next version' in which everything is 'fixed' soon). Games are much more fun with an RNG running things and controlling the appearance of the whole bloody game universe. That and NH is much more flexible when it comes to game mods (assuming you don't mind trudging through a huge wad of K&R C). There are dungeon and level compilers out (part of the source build actually)...
    The C programming language is a derivative of BCPL, another programming language, with a number of special evil memory allocation calls that allow interaction with ... the C compiler. Most standard C code should successfully compile (ha!) and run in the game.

    --
    Zahlman Q. Namlhaz, esq. {:> "Zahl Incorporated - the Last Word in Everything(TM)"
  100. Here we go again.... by HomerJ · · Score: 2

    Two points I want to make.

    1) There is a pretty good majority that want Windows only games in their own catagory. Windows only games are something that's mentioned alot and there should be it's own icon. Picture of a Sidewinder maybe, or that "pc cd-rom" symbol that is on Windows game packaging. Quake has it's own section, other specialized things have their own. The same should hold true for Windows only games such as Diablo 2.

    2) Nice to hear the vast majority of the Slashdot crowd supporting Windows only games. What better way to show that you want Linux ports of games then ot rush out and get Windows games the day they come out.

    I respect that people run Windows and they buy games for their platform. But most of us run linux, FreeBSD, etc. and want games for OUR os. But most don't back up our words with our pocket books and rush out and buy games on the first day that will never see the light of day on anything else but Windows.

    Do I have "sour grapes" over what games are avaliable for Linux over Windows? No. I'm happy with Sim City 3k Unlimted, Solider of Fortune, Quake 3, Unreal Tourney, and the load of other fine games that will apear on shelves for linux this year. These are the games that will get my gaming dollars.

    All those that support Windows gaming will get a reward. It will be more Windows games. My reward for supporting Linux games is that there will be many ohter Linux games to purchase. Most of the slashdot readership WANTS more linux ports of games. Show that support by not buying Windows only games, and spend it on a game for your platform.

    1. Re:Here we go again.... by Rico_Suave · · Score: 1
      Regarding #2 - Yep, the hypocrisy astounds me. Nice to know ethics can be bought by a bit of video game entertainment.

      --

    2. Re:Here we go again.... by ODiV · · Score: 2

      "But most of us run linux, FreeBSD, etc."

      Just nitpicking here. Where do you get your information? How do you know? While this is a site that strongly supports alternatives to Windows, I'm willing to bet that many of its readers (possibly even a majority) use win xx as their primary OS (if they even use more than one OS).

      "All those that support Windows gaming will get a reward. It will be more Windows games. My reward for supporting Linux games is that there will be many ohter Linux games to purchase."
      How can you both get different rewards? This doesn't make any sense to me.

      "Most of the slashdot readership WANTS more linux ports of games."

      Once again, where do you get your information? How many Slashdot users are there? How many posts do articles on Windows only games generally receive? How many of those posts say "I want a port of this." I have no idea how you can take 5 or so posts and their upward moderation to mean that the majority of slashdot users want more linux ports.

  101. Re:URLs by TGR · · Score: 1

    There seems to be some indications that it's just for those with lingering beta files lying about, and not those doing fresh installs.

    --

    Voting Moo Anyway!
  102. Diablo 2 hits the shelves... by NoWhere+Man · · Score: 2

    Diablo 2 hits the shelves...and the FTPs and Warez Sites! I knew a friend was downloading the game from an FTP before I knew it was available for purchase. (Okay I really didn't care when it came out, but I still plan to play for hours on end).

    Very popular, long awaited game. I think its going to be one of the more slower downloads, as everyone is going to want it.

    --

    "Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier
    1. Re:Diablo 2 hits the shelves... by NoWhere+Man · · Score: 1

      My friend has apperently created a few coasters, but was still able to play

      --

      "Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier
    2. Re:Diablo 2 hits the shelves... by Woundweavr · · Score: 1

      I got the game on Saturday at EB. A friend was working there at the time. He had gotten a copy. I later learned that he burned copies for three other people. A friend was at the store getting the game. He directly went to another friend's house to burn a copy. And of course, I went from the store to a friend's to burn a copy. Of course, I'm the one that gets to play multiplayer.

  103. Re:What's the difference? by aonifer · · Score: 2
    6) small but cool difference: "socketed" weapons. These are weapons that have sockets for gems you can collect. Naturally, the slotting a sapphire in to a club makes the club a better weapon (!?).

    Never underestimate the power of a pointy rock.

  104. Re:WELL LA DEE-FREAKING-DA by TeknoDragon · · Score: 1

    and if you play games like this, you'll end up LIVING IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER!

  105. Re:Diablo 2 in Finland... by gedanken · · Score: 1

    I find it doubtful that this will become the best selling PC game in history.

    When the first diablo and doom came out there really wasn't a whole lot of other games like them before. So if new people wanted to play a game *like* the aforementioned well they didn't have a choice.

    The market is a lot bigger and varied now and people have more choices in the genre of RPGs. One such example is the recently released Ice Wind Dale which is sure to attract all the people who bought Buldar's Gate(sp?) which sold incredibly well.

    The game will sell well, this was guranteed by the blizzard brand name alone, but best selling game in history? doubtful, but only time will tell.

  106. Re:So, why is CmdrTaco playing a sorceress? by Seumas · · Score: 2
    Duh! -- Britishing . . .

    Damn it. My DSL won't be ready for anotehr four weeks, at least. And the network at the office blocks UDP. God damn, I feel left out!
    ---
    seumas.com

  107. Re:Sorceress? by gedanken · · Score: 1

    well its massive in that a lot of people will be playing it at any given moment. but each game is limited to 8 players at a time. Your online characters are saved server side so each time you come back to the game you can still build up your character(s). Things such as saved items and completed quests also carry over. One thing that ruined the original for me was the over abundance of cheating, server side character storage should help. So they will avoid the common pitfalls of MMORPGS by simply not being one but still having so many of characteristics that make them fun.

  108. Re:Diablo 2 in Finland... by funkycat · · Score: 1

    Well considering that Blizzard already has sold 1.5 million copies just with the pre-order and my estimate that at least another million will get bought in the first month, thats more then halfway to the 4 million mark, and theres still 3 months to go till september.

  109. Re:Like Diablo 1 by toriver · · Score: 1

    Remember, though, that Hellfire wasn't made by Blizzard but by Sierra.

  110. 31337???? by tubs · · Score: 1
    All these numbers replacing letters...I don't understand!

    Is there a conversion table somewhere? Or a dictionary of common "WeirdNumberReplacingLetters" words?

    --

    try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    1. Re:31337???? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Using numbers instead of letters is a common way of making a pronouncable password that is harder to guess or brute force, because there are a lot more possible character combinations.

      The word "31337", or just "1337" is often used to mock the way warez kids, who are known for overusing misspellings and number substitutions to obfuscate even conversational writing. (because they think it looks k001... er, sorry... cool.)

      In this case, it's "elite", but spelled "eleet", then using 3's for e's (because it looks like a backwards "E"), 1's for l's, and 7's for t's.

      I have no idea who might have put a list of suggested substitutions anywhere, but I'm sure it wouldn't take long to find one. There are no official rules... you could use either "@" or "4" in place of "a".

      Anyway, it is not worth spending a lot of time thinking about. If somebody says "j00 4r3 s0 31337!" around here, you can count on them being sarcastic.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  111. URLs by ay2b · · Score: 4

    Since they weren't in the story...
    http://www.blizzard.com/
    http://www.blizzard.com/diablo2/

    And there's already even a patch 1.01:
    http://www.blizzard .com/support/diablo2/information/patch.shtml


    --
    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    1. Re:URLs by Mamoth · · Score: 1

      Looks like that like is now saying it doesn't delete your single player characters. I'd just get the patch before you play to be safe The deletion (so they say) may have been caused by beta file still laying around their systems.

  112. Re:Games are for losers by synaptic-impulse · · Score: 2

    Diablo II is very late - and nothing new. The game is the same, the play is near the same - and unless they have unveiled a SUBSTANTIALLY larger world - pointless.

    The game employs features that have been around for ages, is sprite based, and has a very linear gameplay. BORING.

    Now pool of radiance seems to be the better fit for yall ex nethacks... Remember when RPG/Fantasy games actually enthralled you with a story.

    I am absolutley amazed at how Diablo II can even sell. It is obvious that ppl are getting it just because they liked Diablo (which was goodfor its time - um... 1995!!!)

    rant rant rant

    5 years WAY too late. I mean, UO had better gameplay/everything and it was released in 97....

  113. $59.99 ?!? by gradji · · Score: 1

    At the local Fry's (the Silicon Valley Geek supermarket), they were selling Diablo II for the astounding price of $59.99

    Not sure if this is Fry's trying to rip me off or Blizzard.

    But if it's Blizzard, let's consider some eerie resemblance between Diablo II and any Win XX release ... Both are priced much higher than competitors (I believe most PC games sell for under $39.99) Both are released much later than their original release date Both have serious bugs that require patches that must be downloaded from the Net Both require a huge amount of Hard Drive space (I think Diablo II requires anywhere from 600 MB to 1.5 GB !!!) Both are hyped beyond belief and will no doubt fail to meet expectations Both are not much of an improvement over the previous version ... just bigger with some more 'features' Both will result in the loss of much office productivity (although in the case of Diablo II, it's "voluntary" and comes with less frustrations)

    Maybe there are more similarities?

    --

  114. Re:Where is everyone? Playing, obviously. by Vishak · · Score: 1

    I thought I totally made up "Vishak" as well and that it was totally original.Turns out it's a very common Indian name. Go figure.

    --
    Intelligent Design Theory is not Creationism
  115. Diablo 2 in Finland... by Jouni · · Score: 2
    This popular game store in Helsinki, Finland might get "only" 1000 copies. I'm sure glad I made a pre-order on mine, as they are very likely going to be drained out of the store by end of the day. The store opens in about 10 hours.

    I have a pint of beer that says Diablo 2 becomes the best selling PC game in history, by end of September. I'm obviously biased by the stress test, but any takers on a bet?

    Kudos to Blizzard for finishing the game (finally) even if they lost several of the core guys to startups. Lookin' good, too.

    Tidbit of semi-useless information; in Japan it's apparently illegal to publish role playing games on weekdays as the number of sickdays become a big issue in the promised land of the otaku.

    Jouni
    --
    Jouni Mannonen : 3D Evangelist @ SurRender3D.com

    --
    Jouni Mannonen | Game Designer, Consultant
    1. Re:Diablo 2 in Finland... by Mamoth · · Score: 1

      They tend to be laggy at times. But I played the first Act yesterday and they seemed fine to me (I'm on cable if that makes a difference). I downloaded the patch in about 5 - 8 seconds max and I was off.

  116. Re:Games are for losers by synaptic-impulse · · Score: 1

    oops - forgot pool of radiance link:

    http://www.poolofradiance.com

  117. What's the difference? by antizeus · · Score: 2
    Presumably the storyline and the quests are different -- that's a given. I'm interested in reading about changes in the game mechanics. Can anyone give us some tasty nuggets to chew on before we actually go out and buy the game?

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
    1. Re:What's the difference? by mikpos · · Score: 1

      IINM, there is also more than one town.

    2. Re:What's the difference? by gribbly · · Score: 5

      Well, first of all it's not that different. It looks and plays very much like the first Diablo. But there are some key differences:

      1) the maps are _much_ bigger.

      2) due to 1), you can now run as well as walk. This is a Good Thing.

      3) the combat is more or less identical (stand and slash), but you can now simply hold the LMB down and your character will repeatedly hack away. No more RSI!

      4) you can get NPC characters who follow you around and help you fight.

      5) the skill system is much more involved (it's now a "skill tree").

      6) small but cool difference: "socketed" weapons. These are weapons that have sockets for gems you can collect. Naturally, the slotting a sapphire in to a club makes the club a better weapon (!?).

      And that, as far as I can tell, is the extent of the difference! Oh, the character classes are different, yet somehow exactly the same :)

      If it ain't broke, don't fix it =

      grib.

      --
      maybe
    3. Re:What's the difference? by Sodakar · · Score: 1

      As others have mentioned, the key difference is the fact that you can RUN... Hehe. Other than that, that you can train in different disciplines - for example, in beta, the Barbarian could choose between weapon skills, proc skills, or other combat skills when allocating skill points. That was quite fun, and quite a challenge... Several of my level 15 beta characters just had the *wrong* skills, and it was hilarious.

      The other highlight is the fact that you can hire "help" (hired NPC chars that help you) and have two-way portals that let you jump to the next waypoint. Well, the original Diablo had something like this via different entrances, but I still like the idea of everything being planar, and being able to jump from one region to another.

      So.. how good/bad is it? Well, I installed Diablo I just to see how much better Diablo II was. Well, I can say this - I would never play Diablo I again. Now... is Diablo II "great" for a game released in 2000? Honestly, I don't think so. The main concept of hack-and-slash hasn't changed, and while you have alternate tactics and skills to work with now, it's still just a hack and slash game.

      I find it odd saying this, but I would rather have named NPC's die off completely once they die... It's just too weird running through the whole continent killing all the boss NPC's you've killed 50 times already... oh well... maybe it's just me...

    4. Re:What's the difference? by Psi-kick+Guy · · Score: 1

      Lots of differences..

      The rendering engine is completely re-done - it uses a 3D modeler-type now.. which means it will also take advantage of your 3D card (Glide and DirectX 3D stuff).. it does tr

      New character classes (5 of 'em) - the old ones are gone, plus a completely new system of stats & experience...

      All in all, looks good...

  118. Re:Whee... by scrytch · · Score: 2

    There's no game there, but there's two isometric tile engines for WorldForge, namely uclient and anvil as well as a couple 3d clients too. Free for anyone to use for their own games (they have no game-specific code in them, WF is more of a toolbox for RPGs, with a med/fan world as its flagship implementation). And the art is better than anything else I've seen in an open-source game.

    <plug>WF could always use artists, writers, graphics and AI coders, etc. Go on over there and check it out.</plug>

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  119. Re:Games are for losers by seanson22 · · Score: 1

    True, true. There are always games like Ultima Ascension, Planescape Torment, Baldur's Gate, etc. There are always quality games out there, they just don't sell that well. The one bonus of that is that all the deep, enthralling, quality games usually end up in the bargain bin. Curse of Monkey Island anyone?

  120. So what about PK's? by Mekanix · · Score: 1

    I tried Diablo a while back, and the most annoying thing (apart from the erternal servercrashes) was those bastard Gee-I'm-So-Cool-And-Dangerous-That-I-Can-Kill-Newb ie-Players Morons.

    So after 2 days I stopped playing, it just wasn't fun..

    Has anything been done to address this issue?

    Bjarne

  121. Re:Only Collector's Edition for me. by kpitta · · Score: 1
    I thought the idea of getting them directly from Blizzard was so they could be fed-exed earlier than the 30th when they'd be hitting the stores. How many at the compound have the collector's Ed., btw? Being that I'm a little curious

    I think it all depends on how close you are to the distribution center. I got my copy yesterday (the 28th) from Babbage's in the S.F. area (close to Blizzard North) They only had copies of the C.E. for preorders though, and it was only $10 more for it. I thought it was worth it to get the soundtrack cd and dvd of the cinematics...


  122. fscking servers by Zomart9th · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be reading /. if any of the diablo 2 realms would stay up consistently. Even Rob only took time out for a quick post.

    Honestly, if i were blizzard, and i had sold 1.5 million copies, i would be damn sure that i had enough servers to handle 1.5 million concurrent connections. It really damages the initial user experience when you can't play your brand new character on your brand new game (which you are required to do for 2 hours in the first 2 days or it's deleted). I hope the server down time only represents a momentary lapse and will not be come a characteristic of the game.

    --
    Bryan Klingner, MCSE, MCP+I
    1. Re:fscking servers by Denjiro · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind just sitting in chat for 2 hours with your new character also works.

  123. I finally have my copy =) by Omicron · · Score: 1

    I kept procrastinating on the pre-order, and me and three other guys drove to a city an hour away to get our copies. There was Diablo 2 promo stuff everywhere, and that's all anyone was talking about. I've been playing for about two hours...in utter bliss. =) Just wanted to say I love the game.

  124. Re:Only Collector's Edition for me. by LogicallyROgue · · Score: 1

    Try www.babbages.com - I only JUST ordered mine - $64.99 with 2nd Day FedEx for $2.95
    --

    --
    Rogue(n): 1. One who is playfully mischievous;
  125. Re:No thanks, I'll stick to Vampire by menasius · · Score: 1

    I dunno I thought Vampire got a little old .. maybe it was the interface that bugged me. There were too many ways to mis click and drain your teamates blood while getting wacked in a big fight.

    I have to agree though the Storytelling stuff is cool, but I think I'll wait for the freedoms that a game like Neverwinter Nights should offer. Until then Diablo2 has gotten me much more addicted than Vampire did.

    -Bort

  126. it won't matter anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Since the majority of users out there are windows users, a linux community boycott of Diablo 2 would not send a clear message to Blizzard. Even if they did notice that sales were below the expected amount, they would attribute it to inadequate advertising, inherent flaws in gameplay, or something else. They would point to their windows-only offering after they had exhausted all other possibilities.
    I think the real solution is for everyone to buy linux games. Once big companies see that sales are decent for linux, they will allow Loki to port (or port themselves).

  127. Look... by Shut · · Score: 4

    Blizzard can get on with its legions of fans spending countless dollars on its incredible games. 1.5 million were preordered. 1.5 million .

    They will eventually port it to Linux (via their extraordinary and friendly staff, or thrgouh another channel, like Loki), as I have read, and can afford to. If you don't want to play an extremely high quality game, fine, don't buy or warez it. But Blizzard won't be crying about not satisfying the Open Source OS crowd immediately when they have already presold 1.5 million copies. They'll be smiling. On giant piles of money.

    By the way, I've heard Warcraft 3 will be released on all OSes at once (Linux, Mac, Windows). This is just a rumor, however.

    As to quote or paraphrase another poster's insight "It says news for nerds." not "News for Linux/BSD/Unix Zealots who have nothing better to do than make fun of Microsoft and Windows".

    And finally, here's the Diablo II Character Guide for those who didnt catch my Anonymous Coward post above.

  128. 'Static' instead of menu!!! by Refrag · · Score: 1

    I have two computers currently setup at home.

    (1) 600MHz P3 w/ 128MB RAM & GeForce 256
    (2) 233MHz P2 w/ 96MB RAM & Voodoo 3 2000 PCI

    Diablo 2 doesn't f'ing work on #1!!! I run through the two logos and the opening movie, and get 'static' instead of the main menu.

    It runs fine on #2. Damn, WTF?!? Anyone else have this problem?

    Refrag

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
    1. Re:'Static' instead of menu!!! by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

      It doesn't even start for me - I don't think the copy protection likes the add on ATA-66 controller my dvd drive is hooked up to.
      --
      Email address is real.

    2. Re:'Static' instead of menu!!! by Refrag · · Score: 1

      I did get Diablo 2 to work by installing the latest GeForce 256 driver on my computer.

      Refrag

      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  129. Save us, Lokisoft! by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1
    Oh what, Windows only, you say? Cough. I don't pay money to reboot.

    Diablo II seems to be high on the list of games that Linux users want to see ported, and that Loki wants to port. I'd certainly buy this game if it were ported to Linux. Heck, I'm still trying (off and on) to get the original Diablo to run under WINE. Anybody heard any juicy rumors about possible ports?

    Save us, Lokisoft!

    Joe Sixpack is dead!

  130. TCP/IP Support by Chrysomite · · Score: 1
    If you don't want to risk it on Battle.net and you actually have friends (face it, some of you don't), there's always TCP/IP Multiplayer. Then the only one to blame when you lose all your cool stuff is yourself or the moron who found a bug that Blizzard didn't.

    I suppose that doesn't mean you can't still gnash your teeth and shake your fists at them though.

  131. Availability by Vladinator · · Score: 1

    How likely is it that people who didn't preorder will get a copy? Should I even bother to try yet, or should I wait for the next pressing or what ever of CD's?

    Fawking Trolls!

    --

    "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion." - Jed Babbin

  132. Re:Multi-Player vs. Stand-Alone by NiteEyes · · Score: 1

    Single player works quite well... I'm playing both a multi-player game and a single player to see the differences. The big deals are:

    - Can't switch characters from multi-player to single-player and vice-versa. BUT, you can play a TCP/IP game (LAN or whatever) with a single-player character.
    - Single-player is immune to the whims and crashes of Battle.Net.
    - You can save your character in multi-player and quit the game, but when you come back, the dungeons are all different (randomly generated of course)

    Multi-player is really for people who want to play together online and trade weapons and fight against Player Killers.

    --
    -- Creativity knows no medium
  133. No thanks, I'll stick to Vampire by Trunks · · Score: 2

    I dunno if it's just me, but after a while the gameplay in Diablo/Diablo II just gets boring for me. I think I'll just stick to Vampire: The Masquerade - Redemption and it's wonderful Storytellers mode. Games are much more fun with a ST/DM type running things and controlling NPCs. That and VtMR is much more flexible when it comes to game mods. There's a SDK out that allows you to make new levels, templates, even a scripting language that lets you change almost anything in the game or add your own code.

    The Codex scripting language is a derivative of Java, a programming language, with a number of special native function calls that allow interaction with the game engine. Most standard Java code should successfully compile and run in the game.

    --
    This post sponsored by Ninja Burger. "
  134. "Realm" Characters... by Psi-kick+Guy · · Score: 1

    From what I understand, they've removed the ability to cheat if you're a "Realm" character..

    "Realm" characters are stored on Diablo's servers, so you can't edit them... For the people who want their characters stored on their own computers, there is nothing stopping you from cheating this way.

    One thing to note, the two character types are not allowed to adventure together (ever), so you don't have to worry about someone hacking their non-realm character to get Godly Plate of the Whale, then giving that to a realm char.

    All in all, looks like a nice tradeoff to me..

  135. Re:LOL!! by brix · · Score: 1

    In my experience -- If it's an AC, it's meant to be a troll; If they're logged in, it's meant to be funny.

  136. How Embarassing! by Scot+Seese · · Score: 1

    How embarassing for Blizzard - For the last two weeks of the Stress Test, there were routinely 35-45,000 persons online playing with very few crashes, and lag was negligable. Now, the game servers take a snooze with 1.5 million paid customers and a weekend looming ahead? Ouch! Someone's beeper is going off!

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
  137. FYI by Benwick · · Score: 1

    Everyone who skipped work to play Diablo 2 has been fired. The firings will continue until office morale improves. If you skipped work today, don't bother going in tomorrow!!
    Homer: Woohoo! Four day weekend!


    Ben Chadwick - Editor, Zero Future/Post-Collegiate Malaise

  138. sprites != lower memory requirements by Supergrass · · Score: 1

    "way more frames of animation" == WAAAAAAAAAAYYYYY more memory for sprites.

    Each frame is a rendering of the sprite, multiplied by (bits of color / 8) bytes. Suppose you have 500 frames of animation for a 32x32x16 character. That's one megabyte of memory, roughly, for a _tiny_ character. You want 1000 frames of animation? 2 megs of memory. And so on.

    All of a sudden, 3D meshes don't look so bad after all.

    --
    Wherever there's a will, there's a motorway.
  139. Re:Better, Free, Open-Source Alternatives to Diabl by desaster · · Score: 1

    Angband actually makes my 486 laptop useful =)

  140. Do you have a mouse in your pocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    To whom are you referring when you talk about _us_? I think it quite arrogant to think you can speak for the whole of the /. reading community.

    Personally, I love linux and I do pay extra respect to software companies that develop for multiple platforms, but I don't hate companies that choose not to do so. And I don't feel that I need to be branded a traitor to the linux movement because I don't boycott Diablo 2 on principle. I am not that petty.

    The reality is that Blizzard is one of the largest game companies out there, and sorry to say it but the fact that Blizzard is a BUSINESS means that judgement calls are made regarding what platforms to support and when. I am sure that everyone, including many people within Blizzard itself, would love for every new game released to be on windows,linux,mac,be, etc., but unless they can convince the people at the top whose primary concern is the bottom line, we are booting into windows to play Diablo II. And I hate to break it to you but most of the people at the top are not programmers and could give two shits how many platforms are supported as long as the profit margin is maximized.

    Life sucks, get a f**king helmet.
    -Dennis Leary

  141. EQ jobs to Diablo II by sugarman · · Score: 1
    EQ was down for 8 hours today for "patches". Yeah right. Sounds to me like too many sysops were checking out the competition.

    But on the plus side, Norrath could be quite quiet over the weekend, with blow-out sales to follow during the Sunday markets. Mmmm. Quiet...

    --
    --sugarman--
  142. Re:Games are for losers by synaptic-impulse · · Score: 1

    Yes and no.

    My point was really that Diablo II is a failure already. They should have called it: Diablo: millenium edition. It is the same game - but they spent all their time taking out all the cheats (good)

    But that is why they lost so many ppl - who wants to work on the SAME GAME for 7 years....

    For the amount of time they put into this and what you get, it shows that all the best game devs work somewhere else :P

  143. Sorceress? by cxreg · · Score: 2

    So I guess CmdrTaco is one of the 50% of guys that like to play as females in games. Or maybe he just likes to dress up in women's clothes and act powerful? By the way, is this a MMORPG? I didn't play the original Diablo but heard it was a lot of fun. Just wondering how they plan to avoid the common pitfalls of MMORPGs if it is...

  144. So, why is CmdrTaco playing a sorceress? by Guppy · · Score: 5
    "I'm a level 10 Sorceress named CmdrTaco, so if you see me, give me cool amulets or something."

    Some time ago, there was a story on Slashdot that dealt with Men Playing as Women, as I see CmdrTaco is now doing. Here's a quick list of some possible reasons why the commander is playing a female...

    - He likes the way the sorceress looks.
    - He likes the technical characteristics of that character class.
    - For, um... exploration of gender issues.
    - He wants horny guys to give him free stuff.

    Now, given that request for amulets, I'd have to say he's playing a sorceress for that last reason there. So all you guys out there playing male characters -- might I suggest you make Taco work for those items by forcing him to flirt outrageously with your characters before you give him anything?
  145. Re:Games are for losers by synaptic-impulse · · Score: 1

    Yup - played it, played the beta stress tests etc...

    its an ok game. but I was just expecting more out of it. So - guess I cant complain too much - I mean, its not their fault that they were too little too late.

    looks like most buy it for the fact that it is D2 - not cuz it is the latest and greatest.

  146. Like Diablo 1 by cage_lynx · · Score: 1

    I'd suppose they are already working on expansion packs for diablo 2 .... like Hellfire for Diablo 1..... does anyone know anything aboit it??

  147. Whee... by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Another roguelike to add to the roguelike games list. Pity I don't do Windows...

    I wonder why we haven't seen a isometric graphical roguelike for Linux yet. I don't reckon it'd be all that hard to code one. UO was OK except they dropped Linux support and we were basically paying to beta test for them anyway. Worldforge seems to be making good progress, but I'm not entirely certain how to classify them yet (Are they a roguelike?) and it looks like they'll be in development for a while yet.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?