Slashdot Mirror


Microchips For Human Implantation As ID

securitas writes: "Reuters is carrying this story about Applied Digital's VeriChip -- a subcutaneous microchip (like the ones they use to tag pets, livestock and wildlife) used as ID for humans. They are radio-activated and would initially be used to store and transmit medical data via the Internet. They will be also used as tracking beacons and personal ID according to a company exec. The launch will be in Europe and South America. The company has made an FDA application and the FCC has already licensed airwaves for a similar device." We've mentioned this company's "Digital Angel" before, but there's an understandable sudden interest in such tracking technologies.

450 comments

  1. Awesome by Vess+V. · · Score: 2, Funny

    Awesome, now when you accidentally ask girls for their IP instead of their phone number, you won't be that far in the hole this time.

    1. Re:Awesome by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I assume they would use IPv6 :)
      That way you can also get QoS data and priority :)

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    2. Re:Awesome by leastsquares · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So you mean that you don't ask for their IP?

    3. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      now when you accidentally ask girls for their IP instead of their phone number, you won't be that far in the hole this time.

      That's right. If you ask a girl for her IP, you won't be getting in her hole either brother.

  2. Big Brother cheers by jpt.d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think this is an awesome idea, but I think governments would abuse it the first chance they got.

    If it was a short range device that you would literally need to be within a few centimetres then it would be ok.

    If it was a long range device (of satallite tracking ilk) then governments would be able to track criminals, and people who can't help themselves (eg. elderly people). But they could also put it on say a political foe.

    It is good with certain limitations.

    --
    What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
    1. Re:Big Brother cheers by LWolenczak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No matter what, I would cut it out. In my minds eye, it would be just as bad as tatooing a person's name on their face, or a barcode on their arm.

    2. Re:Big Brother cheers by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      If governments were to abuse this, how would they do it? They track polotical foes, but is this any different than modern day surveilance techniques? Don't you think that if someone who is high up in the government wishes to track one of their enemies, that they would enlist the skills of the FBI in the process?

      As for international tracking, such as the search for bin Laden, this would be a good idea, but only if the system could be implemented by every government.

    3. Re:Big Brother cheers by evilpaul13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What part of the US Constitution empowers the Federal Gov't to mandate a unique ID and tracking device be embedded in every person?

      As for international tracking:
      1) A terrorist isn't going to line up to have a beacon implanted in them.
      2) A terrorist is going to be in line to get it removed.

    4. Re:Big Brother cheers by jeremy+f · · Score: 1

      What part of the bill of rights prevents such an action?

      If you live in the US, you have a unique serial number attached to your persona which is used for more purposes than you can imagine. What part of the constitution gives us the right to anonymity?

    5. Re:Big Brother cheers by jon787 · · Score: 0

      The Consititution prohibits it!
      The 4th Amendment is kind of at work here:

      Fourth Amendment
      The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


      And the 9th is definetly at work here

      Ninth Amendment
      The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    6. Re:Big Brother cheers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you live in the US, you have a unique serial number attached to your persona which is used for more purposes than you can imagine.

      Yes, but the unique SN isn't literally attached to you, is it? Without this "dogtag", you could easily "disappear" and reappear as someone else, id and all (Witness Protection, etc).

    7. Re:Big Brother cheers by Markusis · · Score: 1

      How would firmware updates work for one of these things?

    8. Re:Big Brother cheers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is good that the constitution does not alow it . But dont forgett that mr Buch is doing his best to get rid of as much of the constitiution concerning civil rights as he can . If he winns the next election im not so sure it will still be prohibited by what will be left of the constitution .

    9. Re:Big Brother cheers by arkanes · · Score: 1

      The part that says that any powers they don't explicitly have, they don't have.

    10. Re:Big Brother cheers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how 8 years of Clinton shitting on the constitution and then Bush does something that only leftists consider unconstitutional (when in fact he has every legal right to do so) and everybody panics.

    11. Re:Big Brother cheers by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      what if they made that illegal?

      of course, this would be years from now, but i can imagine it's going to be very easy to find out whether someone wears such an implant.

      of course it will start with criminals being tagged, but after a while it would be very convenient to just tag everyone at birth.

      i hope there's no ground for my pessimism regarding the human race...

    12. Re:Big Brother cheers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'is this any different than modern day surveilance (sic)techniques? '

      Yes. It's easier, so will result in more widespread (ab)use. If time/place/amount/item information regarding all purchases were unified by ID, and the databases were controlled under the executive branch, say, Presidents of either party would be sorely tempted to conduct fishing expeditions in that database for political gain. I'm worried that in the current political climate, the firewalls that would prevent such abuses would not be constructed.

      I personally don't want anybody to have that information about me. Not marketers, politicians, police, my employer, my landlord, my bank, nobody. Not because I buy lots of RealDolls or anything, but because it's nobody's business WHAT I do.

  3. It won't be long before they are mandatory for all by sludgely · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can vividly see a world in which it is mandatory for all people to have sensors in them. This day is not far off either. It will be introduced as a further measure for our "safety", but in reality it is just another advance of Big Brother as well as our loss of that scrap of privacy that we used to hold.

  4. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need this device to keep tabs on all those subversive white people.

  5. radio tracking chips by psyclone · · Score: 2, Funny
    give a whole new meaning to "aluminum foil hat"

    or, as in the case of Total Recall, wrapping wet towels around our heads may get pretty popular.

    1. Re:radio tracking chips by bn557 · · Score: 1

      I believe the technical term is Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie. On top of preventing problems with tracking, the are a proven to be "An Effective, Low-Cost Solution To Combating Mind-Contro".

      Pat

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
  6. Sayyy Bahhhhhhhd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the uses of tracking foreign peoples, now we can all track who buys micro$oft operating software. On another note, windows xp, v.2003 will require you to wave your hand in front of you monitor to log in...

  7. The Machines will win... by LWolenczak · · Score: 1

    Think about it, If such a thing like in the matrix were to happen, where machines wadge to war with man. They will win with ease if everybody is implanted.

    1. Re:The Machines will win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just design it to emit a deadly chemical when broken. That'll give people incentive not to "hack" or "remove" it. :)

  8. Old news by J.D.+Hogg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Prof. Kevin Warwick in the UK had an electronic tag implanted in his arm as an experiment not so long ago.

    1. Re:Old news by ex0teric · · Score: 1

      aha! i was just looking for that.
      they can put a tracking chip in me as soon as they make it turn on my lights, turn off my screensaver, get winamp going, and have the room say hello to me. and maybe put a cat5 plug in it so i can further my assimilation into everything.

  9. Prisons? by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

    So, the application for this would be prisons or instead of those tags you wear around the ankles for confinment within certain areas, they just implant you.

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    1. Re:Prisons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the sudden it sounds like the movie "Fortress" could be a reality.

    2. Re:Prisons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see this kind of thing starting with prisons and convicts. Maybe making sure they dont violate their bail. All violent criminals will have to be tagged and can be monitored. I think its only a matter of time before we are all tagged for our convenience

  10. No one would accept this by aoeuid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unfortunately people seem overly willing to give up their rights and freedoms right now, however I'm sure if western governments tried to start implanting subcutaneous devices in peoples bodies to track their movements, everyone would wake up and realize whats going on and how ridiculous its getting.

    1. Re:No one would accept this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, they'll get this accepted like everything else. First they'll require only the group that the vast (stupid) majority of people think is OK to persecute; i.e., pedophiles and other sex criminals. "Oh they're so awful it's fine if we violate their rights." Then they'll broaden it to all felons, then all criminals. "Well they are *criminals!*" And then they'll find ways of pushing it on the rest of the public.

      First: Want to travel out of the country? "It'll curb terrorism." Then: Want to get a government job? "Well, the government has to know they aren't hiring spies and fanatics." Want student loans? "I don't want MY tax dollars going to someone who might be a terrorist or fanatic!"

      And continuing... Want to travel on an airline? "It's for your own safety." Want to use public transportation? "It's for your own safety." Want to get a driver's license? "It's for your own safety."

      Then they have everyone.

    2. Re:No one would accept this by visualight · · Score: 1

      Kind of what happened already with taxes. First it was just Social Security, pension fund for everyone, no one need die of starvation in old age, and it's only one percent. Then they make this "covered employment" mandatory. Next they start withholding "income tax", which is okay since everyone is rec'ing a government benefit, namely "covered employment", and finally once everyone's in the system they start raising the percentage to the maximum the sheeple will tolerate. Result? an omni-powerful federal government with the required resources for implementing an id tag system.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    3. Re:No one would accept this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next will come 100% of your income. Then finally 110% of your income.
      Everyone will be living in the streets, or the luckly ones will be living
      at their offices. Oh wait, since 100% of all money will be in the government's hands
      no one will have anything. No one will be working. Woo hoo!

    4. Re:No one would accept this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you give the general population of this country WAY too much credit.

    5. Re:No one would accept this by symbolic · · Score: 1


      They'd have no problem with it if it came with a free CD!

    6. Re:No one would accept this by jhines0042 · · Score: 1

      Put it in your children, it'll keep them from being kidnapped or running away from home.

      Then it just stays there.

      --
      42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  11. 6 lines of text by baronben · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in their present stage, these chips can carry about 6 lines of text, accoridng to the NYtimes artical, so right now I wound't be to worried about satlights tracking my everymove. But technology does progress, and while I don't see any danger at this present moment, I woudn't want one of theose things in my arm.

    1. Re:6 lines of text by marauder · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry? What's the connection between the amount of storage on the device and the ability to read that storage from a long distance? And why is six lines a limiting factor when eight bytes is more than enough to store your shiny new serial number in?

    2. Re:6 lines of text by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "I wound't be to worried about satlights tracking my everymove."

      Reality check. Satellites can't track you now, unless you are carrying a radio transmitter (an emergency locator beacon, for instance).

      I still don't want one under MY skin...

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    3. Re:6 lines of text by tunah · · Score: 1
      Nope. Your {ATM|security|library|etc} magnetic swipe card doesn't need to contain your information, just a little ID code that they can link up to their database.

      Every person on earth can be assigned a unique ID 33 bits long (2**33 ~= 8.6E9). Six lines is more than enough to track everyone.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    4. Re:6 lines of text by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      It's not the satellites I would worry about. Here in Dallas, you can buy one of those tolltag transponders to stick on your windshield for the tollgates. Take a close look while driving around town, and you'll see Amtech interrogators on high telephone poles -- several miles away from the nearest tollway. Funny thing, though--there seems to be no information about these monitoring stations at the Amtech site or the toll authority.

      A strategically-placed network of ground-based interrogators would be more than sufficient to track the digitally-tagged hoardes.

    5. Re:6 lines of text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      6 lines of text

      <LarryWall>Do they have to be 80 characters?</LarryWall>

    6. Re:6 lines of text by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry? What's the connection between the amount of storage on the device and the ability to read that storage from a long distance?

      Because a device so small that it can only hold a few hundred bytes of information is unlikely to have the power to transmit a radio signal that can be detected from low earth orbit.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    7. Re:6 lines of text by sporty · · Score: 2

      Even at 6 lines of text, 20 characters each line to be modest and assume the best of lower case letters only. That's (20*6)^26 "strings", yes?

      Mighty big number which can easily be used as a key to a database, or worse off, a bit mask of things, such as: fellon, rapist, ethnicity, salary, nationality etc.. information that might be read by others for not so kosher reasons.

      I dunno, SSN's are good enough, or Lisence ID's, but at least I have more control who sees those, no?

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    8. Re:6 lines of text by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Slightly off-topic - one of the guys who was on the ground floor of amateur crypto (I think one of the RSA guys, but I don't feel like googling for it) was really interested in cyber-cash and anonymous micro-payments, and devised a scheme for road tolls that would allow anonymous usage measurements and billing to be done without allowing any one persons movements to be tracked. The government ditched it and went with a system that allowed individual tracking.

    9. Re:6 lines of text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a cell phone. New units have GPS capability and will relay that to towers (only in case of emergency, yeah right)

  12. Oh boy by Evil_Furby · · Score: 0

    This is just one step closer to 1984. What next? Cameras everywhere monitoring my every move? Am I going to get up in the morning and slute a cmaera and get my marching orders from big brother? This cannot happen. If you value your privacy and rights you'll fight BS like this until the very end.

    --
    OH NOES! TEH INTARWEB IS BORKEN!
    1. Re:Oh boy by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      Erm, cameras we already have. Just look at the UK as an example. The worlds highest camera count.

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    2. Re:Oh boy by Evil_Furby · · Score: 0

      That's true. I just hope the U.S. doesn't turn into the U.K.

      --
      OH NOES! TEH INTARWEB IS BORKEN!
    3. Re:Oh boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do agree that this is a very troublesome development and that it surly will be abused by gouvernments to spy on political oponents. But new technology is not the main problem fore those of us that dont want to live in a 1984-type world. The technology to create a big brother sociaty is alredy here to a large extent. Why not simply (at least as a first step)demand full openness from the agencies that would cary out this cind off surveilence in your home countries (FBI , NSA , MI5 etc) and demand the destruction of (ore at least strong regulations of) the agencies that does nothing but spying and register people in other counties as well as at home(CIA , MI6 ,GRU etc ). It is time that people who dont want 1984 to happen stop retreating (only resisting new ways of monitaring)and start atacking the ones that are alredy in place .

    4. Re:Oh boy by Real_Mce · · Score: 1

      I guess you don't live in Tampa,FL then... They have put more cameras up outside of YBOR city now! They are becoming nearly ubiquitious.... SCARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! _mce

      --
      All employees must wash hands before using the bathroom. - The Mgmt.
  13. Instead of national ID card? by leastsquares · · Score: 1

    This technology brings up an interesting alternative to the plans for a US national ID card.

    If all foreigners were tagged as they entered the states, then we wouldn't need to carry our passports and INS documentation everywere we go.

    Bars could just scan me rather than going through the process of asking for my ID and then searching through my passport because thay don't know where to find my date of birth in it.

    1. Re:Instead of national ID card? by leastsquares · · Score: 1

      And something else I've realised...

      People will be able to instantly refuse me credit; instead of telling me they will definitely give me credit and then send me a refusal letter a couple of days later when they realise that I have no US credit history.

  14. Re:GPL - Intellectual Theft? by antistuff · · Score: 1

    This is such a good troll. You should have saved it for a time when it would have seemed serious.

  15. No way... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 3, Redundant

    I know I'm going to lose all my Karma because this is the "cool" "tech" thing to do, but out of respect for various religions and my personal beliefs I would die before I'd let them implant anything into me.

    I don't know how many of you are aware of the beliefs in the Bible about the sign of the beast, whether or not you believe them it is important that you at least respect them.

    What is wrong with having a card in my pocket with all this info? It can be forged? Well, couldn't a different chip be implanted? The possibilities of corruption and abuse to this system are endless.

    On a technical standpoint, until they can encrypt it with your own DNA code it's not even worth considering.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:No way... by acceleriter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's going to take a lot of mod points to mod down all the people who make this argument. Even as a non-believer, I'll be gratified to see the "religious right" scuttle the reelection campaign of any legislator, governor, or president that even thinks this might be a good idea. And if it still somehow happens, I'll be on my knees praying for my soul with a rifle in my hand to kill whatever agent of Satan that attempts to force me to accept one.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    2. Re:No way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how many of you are aware of the beliefs in the Bible about the sign of the beast, whether or not you believe them it is important that you at least respect them.

      It's much more important that we TOLERATE other's beliefs first. Respect has to be earned.

    3. Re:No way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to listen to: Brother Stair

      Who often speaks about this subject and what you will have to do when the time comes that they will compel you to take this chip in your body.

    4. Re:No way... by visualight · · Score: 1

      In biblical times a slave was sometimes referred to as "marked" on the hand or forehead even though there was rarely an actuall mark. This is (I think) the most widely made mistake on this topic. People are always looking out for some kind of marking device (implanted id, tatoo, etc.) and not realizing that they are already marked by their social security number.

      This is, of course, an opinion but if anyone's interested here's a link.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    5. Re:No way... by gowmc · · Score: 1

      I am glad I am not the only who feels this way, as that was exactly the point I was going to bring up, and I would like to be counted in the group that did not have a number of their name either.

      --
      -- If it aint broke, fix it till it is. --
    6. Re:No way... by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      I know I'm going to lose all my Karma because this is the "cool" "tech" thing to do..

      Where did you get that idea? Don't you recognize a bunch of civil libertarians when you seem 'em? :)

    7. Re:No way... by simetra · · Score: 0, Troll

      Uh... did you take your medication today?
      Really, on your knees praying, with a loaded weapon, to fight off agents of Satan. Maybe you belong in a loony bin, never mind a chip implant.
      Good grief!

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    8. Re:No way... by acceleriter · · Score: 2

      The fact that you can (apparently seriously) say that is scary. You might belong in a "loony bin" if you're willing to accept one of these implants. Are you? Maybe I'll be in a "loony bin" and you'll be in Hell. Who knows.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    9. Re:No way... by SirNonya · · Score: 1

      Dubya's number is 666.

      We all call him Dubya, right?

      So:

      George D. Bush = 666

      Just something interesting I noticed...

    10. Re:No way... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      I know I'm going to lose all my Karma because this is the "cool" "tech" thing to do, but out of respect for various religions and my personal beliefs I would die before I'd let them implant anything into me.

      Why does everyone on slashdot have to believe they're in the minority even when it's personally obvious they're expressing the majority's opinion? You know perfectly well that not only is this a bad idea, but most of people on here think so, and your chance of getting modded down is extremely low. End of rant.

    11. Re:No way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT YHL HAND.

    12. Re:No way... by Marsh+Jedi · · Score: 1

      I agree. Before, if someone wants to mug you, they bop you over the head and take your wallet. Here they would dig a chip out of your jawbone with a sharp spade.

      Earth sucks--I wanna move.

      Of course Heinlein had something smart-ass to say about cultures that need identity cards to function being a warning sign. Does anyone have that quotation?

    13. Re:No way... by CaWAJuGA · · Score: 1

      You can plant the chip in my cold, dead hand, out of which you just took my gun.

    14. Re:No way... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not a christian, don't believe in God or the Bible, and wouldn't worship God even if he came down from heaven and TOLD me he existed (the guys an asshole), but if I _did_ believe in him, I wouldn't find it hard to believe that there could be a literal mark as well as a metaphorical one.

    15. Re:No way... by Snover · · Score: 1

      Hey, slow down. This wasn't MY fault. You guys have all given evil a bad name. The word you're looking for is "politician".

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
    16. Re:No way... by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      I don't know how many of you are aware of the beliefs in the Bible about the sign of the beast, whether or not you believe them it is important that you at least respect them.

      Nothing personal, but this seems to be a contradiction. I don't have to believe what you believe, but I do have to pay heed to it?

      What if my beliefs said that one should be marked on the hand or forehead to identify you as a servant of the greater one? While you don't have to believe this, you should respect it and give it some thought right?

      Just playing devils (no pun intended) advocate here - the movie "Mark Of The Beast" left quite an impression on me as a kid.

    17. Re:No way... by Chasuk · · Score: 2

      IMHO, religious belief doesn't belong to an exhalted category deserving of special protection or respect, but I still doubt that use of this technology will become widespread; the "666" crowd will object too loudly for it ever to be adopted.

      I guess, strangely, that in this case I am glad for the religious right. :-)

      I can visualize some rather disturbing advertisements.

      TEARFUL MOTHER:
      My daughter, Jennifer, was abducted, raped, tortured and murdered by a known sex offender. If this monster had been tagged with VeriChip, she might still be alive!

      Cut to another scene, where an obviously grieving family stand in front of the WTC ruins, the mother clutching the American flag. A little boy, approximately 6 years old, holds a photo of his firefighter father.

      REPORTER:
      Jimmy, what do you think of the VeriChip?

      Jimmy:
      I think the VeriChip is great! If all immigrants and aliens of Arab-American descent had been tagged with VeriChip, my Daddy would still be alive!

      My apologies for the obligatory WTC reference.

    18. Re:No way... by burbilog · · Score: 1
      On a technical standpoint, until they can encrypt it with your own DNA code it's not even worth considering.

      Even then... it will work until someone takes sample of your DNA and forges your signature. And then what? You can't run keygen to change your DNA.

    19. Re:No way... by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      ah, i see, just like dna testing for everyone because one might become a burglar / rapist / murderer in a near or distant future?

      you are (IMO) right to ridicule the concept of letting emotions take the overhand in a debate like this. the strange thing is that people do tend to react stronger to emotions than to facts, and this is why the above example is too close to reality for comfort.

      what troubles me is that these technologies will be applied, because it's possible. not because we want it, no: because they can...

    20. Re:No way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how many of you are aware of the beliefs in the Bible about the sign of the beast, whether or not you believe them it is important that you at least respect them.

      Um, why?

  16. Goodbye 4th ammendment by FlyGirl · · Score: 1

    Oh, just write it off as another blow to privacy. Won't be long before someone in the government knows where we are at all times and what we are doing.

    1. Re:Goodbye 4th ammendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read 1984 . After that you wont take it so lightly.

  17. Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by Cally · · Score: 2

    I reckon the government read Slashdot, and they've come up with the idea of trolling the general population to help them spot the tin-foil beanie brigade. Short of announcing that the US military will now supply unmarked black helicopters to the UN for homeland security, can you imagine anything more likely to freak out the these-are-the-last-days, the antichrist is coming, blah blah wibble wibble types?

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    1. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by acceleriter · · Score: 2

      So you're willing to be one of the first to take this implant? I'm not a particularly religious man--not someone who would call himself "saved." However, if there's something that would push me into the arms of the most right-wing, fundamentalist factions of society, it would be the government not immediately intervening to prohibit the requirement of such a device as a condition of commerce.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    2. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by simetra · · Score: 1

      Agreed. What a whiny bunch of ninnies!
      I'll take a chip. Maybe then, when I take a trip, I don't have to carry a bunch of tickets and id and stuff; they can just hold a scanner up to my head, read my info, and verify that I purchased a ticket, I'm a law abiding citizen, and I'd like black coffee to drink :) !
      Please, all these paranoid bastards make me sick. They're the first to wave their SSN when they're down on their luck, and exclaim "Hey, I'm number XXX, give me my welfare!"

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    3. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For a puported Mensa member, you don't act very bright. Did you get in on some kind of disability accomodation?

      (Yes, I could get in. No, I'm not insecure enough to actually do it. Yes, I'm just letting you know this to prevent the "I know you're envious of me" comeback. So do something better, if you can, Satan boy.)

      ~~~

    4. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like you create police states . Do you have any idea how many democracies that has been transformed into police states step by step ?

    5. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by simetra · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward, I take such stock in your paranoid ramblings. At least have the balls to stand behind what you say. FYI... they caught some Al Qaeda pussies hiding under birkas(sp?), trying to sneak out of Afghanistan. Anonymous Cowards, unite!

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    6. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by simetra · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how many felons are running loose, robbing, raping, and murdering? How many more innocent people will die because our current security measures aren't sufficient to prevent their acts of violence?
      This Police State argument is pure crap. We have checks and balances. This is the US.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    7. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by arkanes · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna assuem you're trolling, because anyone with a half a brain and a good history text (no, not the one they gave you in high school) will show you exactly where the goverment has shoved your checks and balances. News flash - the checks and balances don't just magically happen. People have to enforce them. That means you. Get off your ass and prove yourself worthy of being an American, or go live in some piddly bannanna dictatorship where you'll be more comfortable.

    8. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by simetra · · Score: 1

      No shit, Sherlock. People need to enforce the checks and balances, yes, I agree. That doesn't mean requiring proof of identity is a bad thing.
      It seems a lot easier to have an embedded chip than rely on very easily forged documentation.
      This mysterious Big Brother that people are whining about doesn't exist. I grow more convinced each day that slashdotters are paranoid delusionals that think they're sooooooo important that they're being watched all the time. Really, why would this mysterious Big Brother give a rat's ass about a bunch of techno-weenies? Really.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    9. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by Glytch · · Score: 2

      If you're having trouble trying to drive a nail into a wall with a drill, you don't use a more powerful drill, you use a hammer. You use the right tool for the job.

      Massive police forces just aren't stopping violent crime from happening. It's time to try something else, like, say, stopping the conditions that facilitate violenct crime from happening in the first place.

      This is the US.

      Four legs good, two legs bad. Baaaaaaaaaah.

    10. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In other words, no, you can't come up with anything. Self-important loser. I hope you get the police state you deserve and that I'm somewhere else when it happens.

      ~~~

    11. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does a national ID stop crime? Do other things need to be implemented as well? Please, list down the measures you would propose to match up the national ID with the felons.

      Now, look at that list and tell us the national ID won't be used to erode liberties.

    12. Re:Govt. trolling for tinfoil hat types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) would an implanted ID be automagically 'unforgeable'?

      (2) What about the threat of large databases of records being compiled of ordinary daily activities? Constant monitoring is not required for abuse of this. Should everyone's purchasing history and travel itineraries, ATM deposits and withdrawals, be a matter of public record? If not, who should have access to these records?

      (3) Agreed, there is currently no Big Brother apparatus. Why build the tools to enable one?

  18. Hacked by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These will be hacked easier than other forms of ID. So much for prevention. It may actually help them. They should start using combinations of biometrics as IDs.

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    1. Re:Hacked by pyramid+termite · · Score: 2

      These will be hacked easier than other forms of ID.

      I can just see some "hacker" with an axe cutting off someone's hand to get new ID ...

    2. Re:Hacked by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      Well, that would give a new meaning to the term "hacker" or to be "hacked" wouldn't it :)

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  19. Mark Of the Beast by hardburlyboogerman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's Here.Now M$ & the Feds will control your life,with a person having no sayso whatsoever.

    --
    Geek Hillbilly
  20. Demolition Man... by niola · · Score: 1

    This is eerie. It is jsut like that movie Demolition Man when in the future everyone had digital tracking devices implanted and big brother could type an id into a computer and locate you anywhere. It was also used for currency as well, allowing people to use their id to draw funds from their account. Man, this could have some really big privacy/security repercussions. For all the secutrity we will supposedly gain being able to track and/or identify people we will lose to crackers who find a way to hack these things for evil deeds. Not good at all.

  21. The Mark by SloWave · · Score: 1

    Now I wish I hadn't picked up "The Mark" as light reading material on an airplane flight a while back. 6 lines of text is enough to uniquely identify everyone on earth.

  22. I want number 666! by isomeme · · Score: 2, Redundant
    Revelation 13

    16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

    17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    1. Re:I want number 666! by Noxxus · · Score: 1

      somebody mod this up! They can put one of those in me when they pry my gun from my cold, dead fingers.

    2. Re:I want number 666! by Khopesh · · Score: 2

      horrah for satan.
      full context

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
    3. Re:I want number 666! by iguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just because everyone says "Oh folks won't do that" has absolutely no relavence when you talk about these same folks that willingly vote 66% saying Yes to reducing liberties for more theoretical security. People are sheep. Individuals are smart. When you bring lots of people together they tend to go the way the crowd goes. Like the majority of these other "security" approaches taken recently this won't actually help security but it will give you a false sense of safety.

      Its a way for power hungry people to control what you do day in and day out. If they can take control of you one way or another they will and will use any event to encourage you to do what they want. Always be on your guard. When you get that mark on your right hand and they decide that everyone who reads slashdot is evil, subversive or part of the great threat, you will suddenly be unable to buy groceries, drive through the toll booth or even have power to your house anymore. Just like that.

      Be aware of the powers coming.

      --

      ----
      Just remove the spaces and do the intelligent thing to email me.
    4. Re:I want number 666! by darnellmc · · Score: 1

      Thanks isomeme, I was looking for this verse. Ain't no way I'm taking this MARK!!!

    5. Re:I want number 666! by anzha · · Score: 1

      So I'm safe if I get it put into my left hand then? ;)

      --
      Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
    6. Re:I want number 666! by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Er... isn't that passage describing VI Sales Accounting: V.I.S.A.? If the company could have its way, no man might buy or sell, save that he has the credit card number of the beast. Even more scary is that the VISA name has sixes throughout it!

      [but, then, everything does. Numerology is so much fun that way!]

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    7. Re:I want number 666! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Taken. But you can have 0x29A.

      ~~~

    8. Re:I want number 666! by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > People are sheep

      From the article:
      > (like the ones they use to tag pets, livestock and wildlife)

      So where's the problem? *rimshot*

      (Hey, at least I give 'em points for honesty. At least we know what we mean to them :-)

    9. Re:I want number 666! by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      666 eh? How about 6002020206?

      -

    10. Re:I want number 666! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good call. 600, threescore (3*20) and 6:

      6002020206
      makes you think.

  23. Why by adamy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What would be the benefit?

    A central database of Retinal/Thumbprint scans can ID you just as easily. All the Info on your medical records could be stored in the central DB as opposed to in your microschips.

    Unless...you could somehow control access to your own Microchips. I could see several levels of permissions:

    Global: Person scans, and now knows that you are a citizen of the USA, EU, PRC ... nothing more.

    Business: Person Scans, and now can get your shipping and billing info.

    Medical: Person scans, and now can get you vital medical history ALA 1st Alert.

    All this we be predicated on you having a public/private key hand shake, similar to the SSL setup.
    1) Remote machine requests permission
    2) Microchip tells chip to grant permission (I have no idea how, I am just dreaming at this point)
    3) Chip grants short-lived one time key for accessing info.

    If someone tried to tag you with one of these against your will, I am sure there would be many ways to distrupt it: Wear a "Diskman" that actually produces white-noise frequencies to cover the radio from the chip...replace the implanted chip with a home made one that proves that you are someone else...implant a chip that compromises a buffer override in the scanning software so that if anyone tries to ID you their machine crashes.

    In other words, business as usuall

    --
    Open Source Identity Management: FreeIPA.org
    1. Re:Why by cxvx · · Score: 1, Informative

      And then you would see a law that considers al these things as terrorist acts, because only a terrorist would need to do such things.

      --
      If only I could come up with a good sig ...
    2. Re:Why by Cloudmark · · Score: 1

      While a centralized database looks good in theory, it becomes difficult in the face of our general inability to maintain even more basic networks.
      If so much depended on the central database, proper use of this technology would require continuous and guaranteed connections that just aren't available.
      On the other hand, no matter how much space is available on a personal chip, it still remains to be seen how we would update it. A centralized database would offer a way around this. Reading the chip is one thing...encoding it is another. Do we re-encode the chip every time a medical condition changes, or does the chip itself simply link to a database that can be updated? If the chip is locally updatable, then it will be incredibly simple to spoof. Slip a professional some extra money and an unscrupulous individual could encode whatever you wanted for you. Even assuming an unhackable central database with 100% connections, this is still an issue. Who gets access? Who can update? If your doctor has medical information to add, what if he updates the wrong entry?
      The shear logistics of this would be staggering and very near impossible. I won't say it will never happen, but in a realistic view, it won't be for a long time. I've got reasonable familiarity with the animal version and even that rarely manages to provide anything close to the performance needed here.

      --
      "Be proud to be a fighter" - Martial Arts Adage
  24. Re:The Worst Part About Demolition Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every restaurant was Taco Bell.

  25. Re:Hahahaha!! by LWolenczak · · Score: 1

    I am very aware of reality, perhaps you need to get your head out of your ass, and truly think about what could happen, and the future. The future is what we make it, if we make it where everybody is "implanted", then we are under the thumb of somebody/something we cannot even see. Thus, we would never be free.

  26. Rev. 13:16-18 by acceleriter · · Score: 1, Redundant

    And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    1. Re:Rev. 13:16-18 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does this mean that those exec's are working for the devil? I do hope that they know what is to come of them if they are...

  27. Yeah, like people are going to allow this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save him that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    I would think being a domanently Christian nation, this simple passage would keep such a thing from happening. Personally I think there is too much freedom in the U.S. to allow such a thing.

    I hope I'm right

    1. Re:Yeah, like people are going to allow this. by joel8x · · Score: 1

      So, according to that quote, does that mean if it is mandatory to have the chip in order to buy something and you don't have one, you could just say your name is Satan and get service?

      --
      Sound waves should be free!
  28. heh by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gives the term "Intel Inside" a new meaning :)

    Next we will have to have that logo tatooed onto our buttocks.

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    1. Re:heh by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Gives the term "Intel Inside" a new meaning :)
      >
      > Next we will have to have that logo tatooed onto our buttocks.

      Last time I spoke to an Intel sales rep, I told him that's what he'd have to do after I told him where he could stick it ;-)

    2. Re:heh by Jebediah21 · · Score: 2

      And every time we speak the chip will override our speach with one of those annoying Pentium Chimes (from all the commercials).

      --

      Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
    3. Re:heh by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Or that cold use it to promote there chips, and other stuff.

      "I got the new AMD chip, and I get a much higher frame rate in Quake then my crappy Pentium *click*. Sorry, I meant to say Pentium the best ! Horray! *click*"

      "Huh?"

      "Stupid Intel... *click* were so cool, they dropped there prices by $20 on the new P6 6.8Ghz, avalible on-line at www.intel.com."

      "Are you OK?"

      "Yes, I'm fine now that have a Pentium 6 installed in my home and business computers *click* ...implant chip!"

      "I think you've had enough to drink tonight *click* but why not have a one more refreashing coke before you leave *click*."

      "I swear....If I ever *click* get a new computer, it will come with a pentium chip. *click* AAAAARRRH!"

  29. Must be incendiary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as they make the chip explosive, I say go for it. Then I'll be able to erase that guy who lets his dog pee on my lawn.

    But of course, I'll take the non-exploding kind.

  30. Cost? by bn557 · · Score: 2

    I don't see this being a feasable idea because of the cost. If they try to make every citizen pay a couple hundred dollars to get this, noone will pay it. If the government tries to fund it, it'll be even worse because they'll end up getting charged out the wazoo and they'll probably end up running out of funding.

    Pat

    --
    Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    1. Re:Cost? by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      I imagine they would get a quite awesome deal if they bought a bulk of 300 million chips. And why give that expensive hardware to the citizen for free? Do as they europeans do, charge. We have to pay for our ID cards and passports.

      --
      +++ath0
  31. A line I find disturbing: by thesolo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ``Of course, we will do this,'' said Saffo of the Silicon Valley-based Institute for the Future ``And it won't be just for the functionality. It will also be for fashion. You've got a generation that's already piercing themselves. Of course, they're going to put electronics under their skin.''

    I certainly hope that Mr. Paul Saffo is dead wrong on this subject.

    First off, body piercing is NOT a new trend. It has roots in almost every other culture, and dates back hundreds of years. Just because it is a recent movement in Western Culture does not mean that every person who likes piercings is going to like having a tracking device in their skin. Not to mention that the large majority of people in Western Culture do NOT like body piercing. There is not direct link between the two.

    Second, isn't anyone worried about the health risks of something like this?! Electronics are a LOT different than an inert, non-reactive metal or ink in the skin. Pacemakers cause enough problems with people in certain situations (microwaves, magnets, etc.) I for one don't EVER want electronics under my skin. I guess if it ever progressed to where you had to get an implant, some Rare Earth Magnets would take care of that problem pretty quickly.

    Lastly, is this something we as humans really want to do for fashion??? If its entirely under the skin, how exactly would it be a fashion accesory? What, would they make the chips come in different colors?? "You cant see it, but mine is leopard-spotted!!" Unless they make them into actual shapes that stick up from under the skin like real implants do, they won't be a fashion accessory.

    I'm slowly beginning to think the Luddites were right; technology could easily be the end of us. The last thing we need as a species right now is the ability to track everyone. Here's to hoping things like this NEVER get widely adopted.

    1. Re:A line I find disturbing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pacemakers cause enough problems with people in certain situations (microwaves, magnets, etc.)

      I lost each of my parents due to complications with pacemakers. According to my father's doctor, almost 40% of people that die within three months after receiving a pacemaker, die from either a complication related to the pacemaker or a failure with the pacemaker. Granted, the ID chip won't control your heart, the 40% he claimed, makes me very uneasy. I couldn't imagine parents willingly submitting their children to a device that could (even with a small chance) kill them. Heck, where I live now, the kids, like the servicemen and their spouses, were required to have Anthrax shots. One child died at another base, and all of the parents here went ape-sh--. Excuse the language, but that's the only phrase I could think of to accurately describe their reaction. No, I don't see parents willingly letting doctors kill their kids.
    2. Re:A line I find disturbing: by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Second, isn't anyone worried about the health risks of something like this?! Electronics are a LOT different than an inert, non-reactive metal or ink in the skin. Pacemakers cause enough problems with people in certain situations (microwaves, magnets, etc.) I for one don't EVER want electronics under my skin. I guess if it ever progressed to where you had to get an implant, some Rare Earth Magnets [wondermagnet.com] would take care of that problem pretty quickly."

      Once of my friends is building an EMP device in his dorm room. Perhaps he saw this coming.

  32. DoD Will Implant Chips in Troops by 2025 by Noxxus · · Score: 1

    From the USAF report Air Force 2025:

    Ethical and Public Relations Issues.

    Implanting "things" in people raises ethical and public relations issues.112 While these concerns may be founded on today's thinking, in 2025 they may not be as alarming. We already are evolving toward technology implanting. For example, the military currently requires its members to receive mandatory injections of biological organisms (i.e., the flu shot). In the civilian world, people receive mechanical hearts and other organs. Society has come to accept most of these implants as a fact of life. By 2025 it is possible medical technology will have nerve chips that allow amputees to control artificial limbs or eye chips that allow the blind to see.113 The civilian populace will likely accept an implanted microscopic chips that allow military members to defend vital national interests. Further, the US military will continue to be a volunteer force that will freely accept the chip because it is a tool to control technology and not as a tool to control the human.

  33. false intentions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really want to use a chip to help a patient, why don't they make an open product that can be used by everybody.. just put in the information that is useful: impersonal medical info (pacemaker, type of special desease).
    If even I could read and control this information,
    I would have no problem with it.
    But why the hell putting in an ID? it has no medical use whatsoever... So the medical care is just false intentions... to put us in a giant prison ;-(

    1. Re:false intentions by visualight · · Score: 1

      Oh, somebody said it. Like why can't these six lines of code be on a bracelet? Why must they be implanted?

      Of course we will do this. Conform to they're business model I mean.

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
  34. A Modest Proposal for making ID Chips palatable by Tsar · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The problem I see with this is that all your information can be retrieved by a variety of unauthorized (or undesired) folk without your knowledge.

    How about adding a couple of things to the human version of this technology:

    • Notification. include an external circuit—perhaps electrodes at each end of the chip capsule—which would emit a mild electric shock to the wearer whenever the chip was 'read.'
    • Controllability. Provide a handheld device with each ID chip which would transmit a locking/unlocking signal to the chip. When locked, the chip would be rendered incapable of transmitting identifying information (similar to the Pentium III CPUID switch).
    • Information Scaling. Let the wearer use the same handheld device to control the type and amount of information retrievable from the chip. For example, on a shopping trip, the user may allow only demographic information to be read, on the condition that stores and malls which read the info will give some small discount on purchases in return for the information.
    If I were guaranteed this level of control, and the control was personally verifiable, I'd have no problem having such a device implanted.
    1. Re:A Modest Proposal for making ID Chips palatable by SloWave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or Disable the thing...

      1. Disable the interlock on a microwave oven.

      2. Stick your arm with the chip inplanted in the microwave and fry the bugger.

      3. Remove arm before you get cooked.

    2. Re:A Modest Proposal for making ID Chips palatable by tunah · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...which would emit a mild electric shock to the wearer whenever the chip was 'read.'

      Am I the only one who *really* wants to get their hands on a reader?

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    3. Re:A Modest Proposal for making ID Chips palatable by Marsh+Jedi · · Score: 1

      Yes, Dr. Mengele....an electric shock .

      Wouldn't a simple vibration be sufficient? You know, like one of those new-fangled mobile phones they invented?

      I also think it might be nice to be able to _turn it off_.

    4. Re:A Modest Proposal for making ID Chips palatable by arkanes · · Score: 1

      The ideas you mention negate the purpose of using the chip at all - if it's going to be controlled from a PDA, why not just use the PDA+biometrics?

    5. Re:A Modest Proposal for making ID Chips palatable by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "If I were guaranteed this level of control, and the control was personally verifiable, I'd have no problem having such a device implanted."

      In theory these would be reasonsable ideas, but if the technology was implemented in the US, you can be sure that the FBI or a similar Federal group would be in on it and there would be backdoors, undocumented capabilities, extra features that they wouldn't tell anyone about so that they can violate privacy at their convenience.

  35. JOHNNY MNEMONIC by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

    Wait till there is enough storage in these things, data couriers anybody?

    Oh no, my brain is leaking again :)

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  36. As long as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get one of those cool Total Recall style things to shove up my nose to take it out with.

    1. Re:As long as by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah, thats gotta be the worlds ultimate booger picker or nose hair trimmer :)

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  37. Immune system by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

    How will the body's defence system react to a forign device inside them?

    Would some people be affected by side effects?

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    1. Re:Immune system by J.D.+Hogg · · Score: 1

      I understand the capsules are made of biocompatible material, and they are also coated with proteins that both acts as localized immunosuppressors for a while and forces the tissue around it to grow, which effectively "anchors" the device in place.

    2. Re:Immune system by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      Yeah but what if it starts growing :)

      I am 2 of 9, we will assimilate you, resistance is futile :)

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    3. Re:Immune system by bluelip · · Score: 1

      probably the same way it reacts to a pace maker.

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
  38. Onboard data or onboard id? by MikeLRoy · · Score: 1

    Bassically, what i'm getting at is these chips will probably contain a comlicated, encryptyed, and small ID number. When a person "scans" the chip, the number has to be looked up in a database for the appropriate info, like a credit or debit card. So... the only advantage (i'm not going to get into the big-brother stuff here) is that it makes it harder to fake who you are. However, It'll be hard to legistlate that everyone needs an implant.

    --
    -Michael Roy Some people are like Slinkies. Not really useful, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down
    1. Re:Onboard data or onboard id? by hazem · · Score: 1

      It won't be as hard as you think. Do you want a federal student loan? Do you need welfare? How about getting a drivers license? These are all "voluntary" - but in order to get these voluntary government services, you will need to provide your chip-generated ID.

    2. Re:Onboard data or onboard id? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And that's just the government. People tend to forget that all that "free association" that goes on outside the government, in which you can now be required to give up an SSN or now go without, such as: turning on heat and electricity to your house, buying a car, getting a telephone, etc. Pure libertarians tend to argue that this really is "free association," since these are luxuries, not necessities. (Due to the asymmetry of power between one customer and these entities, that's not true, anyway.) I'll start to believe them when the people saying that are all living off the land without any of those "luxuries."

      Anyway, figure that any entity that requires an SSN as a condition of doing business with you now will require that you be marked.

      ~~~

  39. The Good, The Bad, and the Freedom. by under_score · · Score: 2

    This sort of technology has both its bad aspects and its good aspects. In brief, the bad relates to possible privacy violations: your movement may not be so free as it once was. That said, the good aspects really are significant. First of all, there is a good side to being able to track peoples locations. If you lose a child, you would be desperate for this sort of technology! Determining alibis would be easier, etc. Another good side is a long-term effect. If this sort of device becomes more sophisticated, then it may eventually evolve into a ubiquitous computing environment. You bring your computing environment with you everywhere you go. I imagine this as being kind of like an implanted PDA. The technology for tying implants into the nervous system is developing and so like in many SciFi novels and movies, it is not unlikely that this could develop into extended memory and computation abilities that are indistinguishable from a persons normal thought processes. In an ideal situation, these things are really really good development... But things aren't ideal right now. In fact, the reality is that at least for the foreseeable future, our rights and freedoms are going to decrease. And almost certainly, this sort of technology would be taken advantage of.

  40. hmm by MoceanWorker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    how long before someone h4x0rz it?

    --


    "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
  41. Re:Hahaha! by LWolenczak · · Score: 1

    Ofcorse, I have to be to be working in the computer industry.

  42. As long as the chip uses a M$ operating system by rickthewizkid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    As long as the chip uses a Microsoft OS, I'm okay with the chip. It will crash so often that nobody would be able to get any information out of it.

    (Scenerio)
    Police: Sir, I need to scan your ID chip.
    [attempts to scan chip and fails]
    Police: Uhhh for some reason, I am getting a blue screen of some sort on my reader. I knew they shouldn't have used Windows on these things!

    -RickTheWizKid

  43. I dont really like this but. by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Flamebait



    I do think we need national ID cards. Right now with all our terrorist problems its really the ONLY way to know whos a terrorist and who isnt. You shouldnt be able to buy anything from a store or do anything without ID. However ID on a chip would make sure you dont lose you rcard, I dont like the idea.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:I dont really like this but. by alecto · · Score: 2

      How are you going to use ID cards to tell the terrorists from the non-terrorist? Will the terrorist ID cards have "TERRORIST" across the picture diagonally, like some states do with "MINOR" on driver's licenses?

    2. Re:I dont really like this but. by BrookHarty · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Your not a TERRORIST until you commit the act of terrorism, until that date, its free speech.

      But of course one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.

    3. Re:I dont really like this but. by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      but by that point you should be in jail or out of the country

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    4. Re:I dont really like this but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who hijacked the planes did NOT use false id , they would NOT have been in any way stopped by this technology , stupid person !

    5. Re:I dont really like this but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ghandi and Nelson Mandela was considerd terorists . And would you relly give upp your freedom in order to keep people like them out . READ 1984 YOU IGNORENT PERSON !

    6. Re:I dont really like this but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheep ! try reding 1984

    7. Re:I dont really like this but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not if you live to see that freedom regained. Godspeed, brothers and sisters.

  44. Spooky stuff by pongo000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Other news sources have quoted the company's bigwigs as touting this technology as a means for employers to keep track of their employees. I can imagine a day down the road where job requirements will call for "willing to undergo biometric implantation" as a prerequisite for the job. Those of you who simply refuse to believe the government will never embrace this technology should wake themselves up: Things we take for granted, such as driving, intrastate freedom, and higher education are privileges accorded to us by the government. Already, we are required to surrender our fingerprints, our retina prints, our Social Security numbers, and other personally-identifying data to secure these privileges. The government won't force anybody to be digitally tatooed: They'll simply withhold these things, these privileges, from those of us who refuse to submit.

    This is dangerous stuff, more dangerous than Ellison's half-baked ideas of a national ID. People who condone, support, or otherwise promote the branding of humans as cattle (whether digitally or otherwise) are very sick fucks.

    1. Re:Spooky stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ----
      job requirements will call for "willing to undergo biometric implantation" as a prerequisite for the job.
      ----

      When these days come, it'll be time to return to the simplicity of living. What happened to simply growing enough food to feed you and your family, and the leftovers being traded for things you needed? We overcomplicate our lives today in the name of excess "stuff" that we need, which only takes away from our humanity. I won't receive any such digital "mark" and I'd rather die than take it.

    2. Re:Spooky stuff by TraceProgram · · Score: 1

      And if they do withhold these, privileges, then we will find them elsewhere. We sometimes forget that we are the government. If enough people don't like something then they can change it! For better or worse, it has happened. Thankfully we have rights guarunteed by a set of unbreakable, undeniable freedoms. We just need to be more vigilant about keeping them sacred. We need to put pressure on those who would take them away, like Ashcroft, the Religious Right, or businesses trying to make money from fear. Vote with your money, vote with your conscience and vote to make changes.

      Those of us here who are Americans need to keep stupid things like this out of the public sphere. These technologies to track and tag are dangerous on more levels then they are ever possibly useful. It doesn't mean that we can't look at what they are and what they do, it just means that we cannot allow anyone to mandate their use on the masses. Sadly those that would have technologies like this used are very good at using FUD to get there way. Its why Microsoft is so successful. So instead we must educate, fight, and in our own way remind people that these technologies are to be feared even more then terrorists/Antrax/etc (pick your excuse for control).

      Ok I've rambled enough. Just remember my fellow Americans. No matter what we are still able to guide our collective destiny, we just need to be willing to work for it.

    3. Re:Spooky stuff by n-baxley · · Score: 2

      Already, we are required to surrender our fingerprints, our retina prints, our Social Security numbers, and other personally-identifying data to secure these privileges.

      Um... Isn't an SSN issued by the government? I'd guess they can use it how they want.

    4. Re:Spooky stuff by evilpenguin · · Score: 2
      I'm doing this from memory, so it is an imperfect paraphrase, but here goes:


      We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal, endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these rights are the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, and that whenever a government becomes hostile to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.


      That's a misquote of the American Declaration of Independence. I think a lot of people forget that the American government was founded by a bunch of radical free-thinkers, and that it was a revolutionary movement. EVERYBODY was an American Patriot after the successful revolution, but certainly not everyone was before.

      As for chips, I don't even particularly like this technology for dogs, let alone humans. There should be no circumstance whatsoever under which the government (or any entity) may forcibly violate the integrity of my external integument.

      And I am not concerned about the numerology of the beast, the number of the beast, or the neighbor of the beast.

      There are so many less personally intrusive ways to eliminate my privacy...

      I do not recall being required to to give my retina prints or fingerprints to anyone at any time. Not to enter college, not to get a driver's license, not anything.

      Social security numbers are used by everybody because they are (theoretically) unique numbers everyone has, and relational databases love unique IDs.

      The government isn't the danger. It is the complacency of the people who constitute the government. In other words, you and me. I get so sick of people who think there is some hostile force out there, with which they have no connection, that is working against their interests. Guess what? That force is, in part, you.

      So, get to work. Alter or abolish it.
    5. Re:Spooky stuff by pongo000 · · Score: 2

      Um... Isn't an SSN issued by the government? I'd guess they can use it how they want.

      The Privacy Act of 1974 (PL 93-579) have these things to say about the individual's right to privacy:

      --Congress finds the growing use of computers can harm the individual from "collection, maintenance, use, or dissemination" of personal information.

      --The right to privacy is protected by the Constitution.

      --Section 7 states it is unlawful for any Federal, State, or Local government agency to deny any individual right, benefit, or privilege becasue of individual's refusal to disclose his/her Social Security number.

      --Federal, State, or Local governments, upon requesting disclosure of an individual's SSN, must include information whether the disclosure is mandatory or voluntary, the statute or other authority under which the disclosure request is made, and what uses will be made of the individual's SSN.

      The bottom line is that the government is not entitled to use the SSN any way they see fit. The authors of the Privacy Act saw fit, however, to ensure the Act would not provide an inpenetrable veil of privacy:

      "[The] Privacy Act is not intended to transform every privacy violation into [a] constitutional tort."

      Which is how Federal, State, and Local governments get away with violating the Privacy Act every single day: Congress recognized the need for individual privacy, and the courts uphold this right up to a certain threshhold. Also, the Privacy Act grandfathered in disclosure requirements in place prior to 1975, along with other "special uses" as required. As far back as 1989, Congress listened to testimony in which the Social Security Administration actually verified SSNs for millions of Americans on behalf of bands and credit bureaus.

      Ironically, the law offers no protection for non-government agencies requiring disclosure of your SSN. While governments can't use it the way they want, business are free to do so.

    6. Re:Spooky stuff by pongo000 · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      Social security numbers are used by everybody because they are (theoretically) unique numbers everyone has, and relational databases love
      unique IDs.


      This is the inherent danger of using the SSN for identification purposes: The very uniqueness of the SSN allows the cross-tabulation of any data stored on any database anywhere in the world which uses the same unique key. It might be unique, but the SSN is also a ubiquitous identifier. It's what permits the state to arrest you on a routine traffic stop because of non-payment of alimony. It's what allows a city government to deny you employment because you're late paying your local taxes (maybe because of a legitimate reason).

      The government is the danger, very much so. As government becomes more centralized, power is taken away from the people. Information is power, and thanks to your SSN, your fingerprints (yes, some states do require fingerprints for things such as driver licenses, concealed handgun permits, etc.), and other unique data, the government is able to touch your life in ways you might never imagine.

      I worked for the US government for over a decade. During that time, I was forced, over the course of several years, to learn my way around the Privacy Act to force the government agency I was working for to expunge certain derogatory information about me from their records. You see, I was essentially "blacklisted" by the government, which made it very difficult for me to find employment after leaving government service. I was eventually successful in having the lies removed from my government files, but to this day, I find myself having to explain about "gaps" in my employment records from the deleted data in various financial and government transactions. This can be very difficult at times, trying to explain away data that isn't there without disclosing the data in the first place.

      The government is far more dangerous than you can imagine. And I would hardly consider myself "complacent."

      As for getting to work, I already have: I started railing against the use of SSN for personal identification purposes in 1989, and have continued to do so as time permits.

  45. forget personal info... by niekze · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I want one that stores Mp3's

    but the real question: how long before some /. reader hacks it and mounts an 80gigger under his arm?

    I can see it now....Linux ported to Steve

    --


    Chaos, Mayhem, and Destruction: Not
  46. Its not going to work by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    While I like the idea of a national ID card, This is too much.

    I think we need a National ID card to fight terrorism, theres no other way to know whos a terrorist and who isnt.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Its not going to work by cxvx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's so stupid, it's not even funny anymore.

      During the 70's Europe suffered from many terrorist attacks from diverse groups such as the German RAF (Rote Armee Fraction), Carlos the Jackal and his group, right-wing extremists in Italy,... .

      Now in almost every country in Europe, there already was a national id-card.

      So according to your logic, this never could have happened.

      But you should consider that these people had no problems travelling trough Europe because they had *grasp* false id-cards. On many occasions where one could apprehend these terrorists, they often found different fake ID-cards from different countries on them.

      Nowadays you could say, we put them all in a large database and check that database everytime someone eg. checks in a plane, but how do you handle foreign ID-cards? I don't think that an international ID-card database will happen the first century.

      --
      If only I could come up with a good sig ...
    2. Re:Its not going to work by mentin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I think we need a National ID card to fight terrorism, theres no other way to know whos a terrorist and who isnt.

      So you think the terrorists will wait to receive an ID card, and ask to print "I am a terrorist" on it? National ID card is good to help FBI and the like to spy for locals (that is why it is "National"), but will fail short of helping fight terrorist.

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
    3. Re:Its not going to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of Oklahoma?

    4. Re:Its not going to work by bludstone · · Score: 2

      right. like there arnt american terrorists. or did you forget the oklahoma city bombing?

      --

      no .sig
    5. Re:Its not going to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also would like a national ID card but not to stop terror. If someon is willing to die for a cause what is an ID card going to do. Now for my reason. It Could help out with goverment aid. Walfare/ medica/ Bla bla bla could have a singel card/place for entry for all functions. Also I belive a well done system could save many billions.

    6. Re:Its not going to work by MiTEG · · Score: 1

      Yup, all terrorists are not US citizens. The ID card will tell us that they are a citizen and not a terrorist. Ahem.. and Timothy McVeigh wouldn't have had an ID card because why exactly? An ID card won't do anything.

      --
      The future isn't what it used to be.
    7. Re:Its not going to work by jcr · · Score: 2

      >I think we need a National ID card to fight terrorism, theres no other way to know whos a terrorist and who isnt.

      Where did you acquire this insane fantasy that perps can be deterred by being forced to identify themselves?

      Mohammed Atta WASN'T using an alias.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    8. Re:Its not going to work by sysop0130 · · Score: 0

      All but three (I think) of the 9/11 hijackers were legally in the US, though...wouldn't that mean they'd get an ID too?

      --
      -------
      "People who do not break things first will never learn to create anything." -Philippine Proverb
  47. I couldn't put it better than... by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Those who can give up essential liberty in order to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" Benjamin Franklin

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
  48. Now there is a use for by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    all those CueCat scanners.

    In all seriousness...no FSCKING way.

    what kind of mindless sheep would allow this?

    Has anyone wondered/asked if all the verichip execs would have this done? Eh?
    My puppy has one, but me? Hell no. I rarely get lost, can fend for myself and am house trained too.

    The moment I start barking and piddeling on the floor, well, I'd assume I have "lost it" and perhaps it would be a good idea then...until that day..."they" can eat me.

    .

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:Now there is a use for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the US population ARE mindles sheep . Buch only have to say terrorist and all the litle sheep will gladly acept it .

    2. Re:Now there is a use for by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > I rarely get lost, can fend for myself and am house trained too.
      >
      > The moment I start barking and piddeling on the floor, well, I'd assume I have "lost it" and perhaps it would be a good idea then...

      Another handy use for it - Alzheimer's patients (a.k.a. "wanderers" when they make it out of the nursing home, who often freeze to death if they wander out during winter). Nuff said.

      (OK, that's a case for voluntary implantation, not widespread implantation, but it's still another good use.)

  49. Re:Hahahaha!! by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    Unless this chip is implanted deep in he body at birth they will be removed, shorted, hacked in a matter of days...The thing to watch is when they start offering to parents to ensure the safety of the kids.... Those in jail are gonna get it, no question.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  50. national ID cards should be mandatory for all by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    US citizens. You should be required to carry the card everywhere you go, and use it to buy from a store, use it to get a job, everything. All without the card be questioned, their records checked and even arrested in some cases.

    This would make terrorism from the outside almost impossible. Then we'd only have to worry about the terrorists within the country.

    It would also solve the problem of all these illegal workers stealing jobs from us, and living off of welfare and so on and so forth.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:national ID cards should be mandatory for all by mentin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      >It would also solve the problem of all these illegal workers stealing jobs from us, and living off of welfare and so on and so forth.

      No, it would not. SSN is supposed to be THE card that prevents it, and is required to get the job, etc. However, it does not help for obvious reasons (because only legal workers use it, and but illegals find a job where it is not required). Another card would not help either. It will only help Big Brother to know what you buy, where you go, who you talk to, etc.

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
    2. Re:national ID cards should be mandatory for all by Brainboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      begin sarcasm

      And all those that oppose these measures and rant about 'lost liberties' only give ammunition to terrorists and scare hard-working Americans

      end sarcasm

      --
      Just a guy with an opinion
    3. Re:national ID cards should be mandatory for all by onosendai · · Score: 1

      Yes, and then you can store all the information on the completely unhackable oracle 9i running on super secure winXP of course, kindly supplied by messers Ellision and Gates.

      Wait, is that santa ?

      --
      <? include ('signature.inc'); ?>
    4. Re:national ID cards should be mandatory for all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I've ever seen a troll with such a low user number before.

    5. Re:national ID cards should be mandatory for all by D+Anderson+n'Swaart · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've seen a troll posting at +1 before. The frightening this is that I don't thinks HanzoSan is trolling. I get the feeling he honestly believes the lunacy he's ranting.

    6. Re:national ID cards should be mandatory for all by botik32 · · Score: 1

      Well perhaps a troll hacked his account to post such nonsense... it certainly smells like a troll to me.

    7. Re:national ID cards should be mandatory for all by D+Anderson+n'Swaart · · Score: 1

      This be true. I've seen a number of posts by this guy and they were all pretty good up until now.

    8. Re:national ID cards should be mandatory for all by sysop0130 · · Score: 0

      What, and have the government able to track our every move? Every purchase we make, every place we go...WTF is wrong with you?!

      --
      -------
      "People who do not break things first will never learn to create anything." -Philippine Proverb
  51. Re:It won't be long before they are mandatory for by wokig · · Score: 1

    Just think- if the chip will monitor what's going on in our bodies, won't it potentially be able to determine what emotions we're experiencing or what substances are circulating in our bloodstream? I'd hate to see the day that a group of people get busted on private property for one person smoking pot and subsequently small amounts of THC entering the bloodstreams of those nearby. On the up side, it'd prolly make a coroners life that much easier.

    --
    "I'm not Dev/Null, I'm a rock!" Dev/Null, from VtM: Redemption
  52. Probably Redundant, but I have to mention it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm sure you all are familiar with the Biblical reference of a mark on the right hand or forehead, but in case you missed it, click here to see the most pertainent section.

    The location is Revelations 13:16-17.

    I don't consider myself a real right-winger. However, if this kind of thing comes down, I, too, will be waiting with rifle in hand for Ministry of Truth^H^H^H^H^H Homeland Security to knock down^H^H^H^Hon my door.

    (Is there a possibility that the gov't trolls places like /. for a list of "non-compliants"? Sure. That's why I posted as AC.)

    1. Re:Probably Redundant, but I have to mention it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asume you are a US citicen . To someone outside the US ( like myself ) it is really scary to hear ( or read ) someone saying that the government is probably violating my constitutional rights so i will act as if they did . I am very woried abaut the current development in your cuntry as a police state wersion of the USA would be very bad fore the entire world . Manny people have died fore civil rights , so dont throw them away ower someone like bi ladin . PS if they are knoking on your doorstep whith a chipp in hand its alreddy to late

  53. Embedded Technology as a Fashion Statement by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    As seen earlier on another channel. (about half way down the page) last thursday, the LA Time had a story on it.

    Also, Futurist Paul Saffo had the idea that "As some people wring their hands about the invasion of privacy and civil liberty, a whole other generation is going to go, 'Cool! I've always wanted to embed technology in my body.' It's going to be fashion. One sure sign that teenagers will love it is if it terrifies their parents.' "

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Embedded Technology as a Fashion Statement by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > "As some people wring their hands about the invasion of privacy and civil liberty, a whole other generation is going to go, 'Cool! I've always wanted to embed technology in my body.'

      Yeah, I admit I'm not so thrilled about it as an ID technology, but if it did something, I'd line up to get one. (Suppose we go forward a bit and hook it up to something like a cochlear implant - see someone and it whispers in your ear the name of the person. I could sure use that at parties, I'm horrible with names ;-)

    2. Re:Embedded Technology as a Fashion Statement by falzer · · Score: 1

      Suppose we go forward a bit and hook it up to something like a cochlear implant - see someone and it whispers in your ear the name of the person.

      Maybe their team/frag count too?

  54. wipe out by doooras · · Score: 0

    what happens when someone writes a script to zombie these things and uses them to DoS the whole system...

  55. look at the past by contre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I heard a few posts back the argument that, while now people are throwing away civil liberties like so many empty Doritos bags, the idea of implanting a chip in everyone's arm would force people to wake up to what they're doing.

    Not to sound like a doomsayer, but at this rate, there is no doubt people would accept these in mass if they were offered today.

    Governments are notorious for their propaganda skills. If they started running flashy commercials telling America that this is the only way to fight terrorism, the lines for these microchips would be miles long. Americans already have a convenient unique serial number, the Social Security number, that could easily be put onto everyone's microchip.

    I always thought Americans valued their rights, but two incidents are giving me leanings otherwise. First was the entire election mess a year ago. It boils down to this: Gore was the president chosen by the American people. When they put Bush in office, there was so little protest it disgusted me. The people made a choice, and the government said it didn't care what the people wanted.

    Second, and even more shocking, was the lack of outrage over Ashcroft's comment a few weeks ago, that speaking out against the government is aiding and abetting the enemy. It's not hard to imagine Ashcroft adding "and aiding and abetting the enemy is treason, a criminal offense" onto the end of that sentence.

    Will no one stand up and defend the rights we are owed as Americans? Or will this entire country simply march into a 1984-like hell to be started by these invasive microchips?

    1. Re:look at the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rights we are owed as Americans?
      Nothing is ever owed to you. You must earn it. Maybe you should run for some political office or help with the compaign of a official you feel stands for what you want. At least make sure you vote before you complain!

    2. Re:look at the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that I voted for Bush, but he was the winner.

      Time to get over it.

      Ashcroft, now there's a scary dude.

  56. I've got a better idea. by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 3, Informative
    We use ear tags for cattle. They're a hell of a lot cheaper.

    Let's say that I contact someone while I'm at work, wearing the icky blue polyester suit. How am I going to read this chip? With a regular driver's license, I can take it back to my car, shine a light on it, see if it's fake, run it for warrants and license status, find out if the holder is a sex offender, and copy everything onto a citation or a field interview card. And if my flashlight and my car's map light quit, I can still read them.

    Oh, and did I mention I can look to see if it's been faked, maybe compare it to one of the standard references?

    With these things, no. I'm a cop, not an electronics tech. I've got no way of knowing if the signal is legitimate or from a black-market home-programmed chip. It'll probably take special equipment to read these chips, and I've learned that expensive electronics have a way of failing about fifteen seconds before I need them. And six lines of data leaves no room for a signature.

    So, I'm not entirely sure about the practical aspects of this, or whether there's actually anything to gain.

    And how about we look at the legal aspects. I'll admit that I haven't gone through either the Federal or Colorado constitutions with a magnifying glass lately, but I don't recall seeing any authorization for government to brand people like so many livestock.

    Of course, I could be wrong about the Constitition thing. However, at the academy they did say that the parts of the Constitution that were written in the margins in red crayon didn't count.

    But then, a lot of the experimentation with implantable ID was overseas. And in much of western Europe and in Japan, cops are expected to know aspects of individuals' lives that I don't even tell my parents. Like who's sleeping with who. Or who lives where-there are ways in the US for that information to be pretty much completely unavailable to police, but not in Japan or most of western Europe (for some reason, France, Germany and Holland spring to mind, but I wouldn't swear to that.)

    1. Re:I've got a better idea. by hazem · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      Even worse is the problem is that most Americans, including the people working in the government, have forgotten that the Constitution is a document that limits government by spelling out what it CAN do. Instead, they now believe that it only restricts what what the government CANNOT do - so by default, the government is free to do anything that is not specifically prohibited in the constitution.

      This was one of the major arguments AGAINST the bill of rights. Many believed that it was at best unnecessary because the government was not explicitly given the ability to curtail the personal rights found in the Bill of Rights. For example, the Constitution did not give the government the right to curtail free speech, so therefore it should not have been necessary to make an ammendment prohibiting it from doing so. At worst, the Bill of Rights establishes the framework for the government to do anything it wishes, as long as it is not already prohibited elsewhere in the Constitution.

      Sadly, the "worst" scenario is what we have now. The government should be permitted to do only what is spelled out in the Constitution. Instead, it does everything that is no prohibited in the Constitution. This is wrong.

      I guess that makes me a libertarian.

    2. Re:I've got a better idea. by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most of the enthusiasm for photo IDs is from merchants, not cops. If cops really want to know who you are, they take fingerprints. A PDA-sized gadget with a fingerprint sensor and a wireless link to a fingerprint database would be far more useful than an implanted chip.

    3. Re:I've got a better idea. by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 1
      Most of the enthusiasm for photo IDs is from merchants, not cops. If cops really want to know who you are, they take fingerprints. A PDA-sized gadget with a fingerprint sensor and a wireless link to a fingerprint database would be far more useful than an implanted chip.

      That works really well in the jail, where most counties have an AFIS (Automated Fingerprint Identification System) terminal. That is, it works really well if the subject's fingerprints are on file with the FBI. Someone who has never been a cop, or in the Armed Services, or arrested probably will not have prints on file.

      Note that I said 'in the jail.' The terminals are pretty big, big enough that I wouldn't even try to carry something that big in the car.

      Yeah, I can roll someone's prints on scene. However, that does no good until I can get the card to someone who can sit down with it at the terminal.

      And I can't take someone to the jail against his will unless he'd been arrested. For that, I need probable cause to believe that he committed an arrestable crime. Merely being a suspicious person who I suspect is lying about his identity isn't enough.

      Now, if there were print terminals the size of PDA's, they'd be damn useful. However, I'm not holding my breath on it being this year.

      Besides, there are ways to tell if someone really belongs to his ID, and if he's lying, and if the ID's fake. THey give us $1500 radios and put computers in our cars, but this job is still about people and not technology.

  57. Metaphor and numerology by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads

    I think its fair interpretation isn't a strict Nostradamous like prediction of future events as much as a metaphor for deeds and mind - hand or forehead. Pre-Christian numerology has consiered 6 to be quite an evil number and three sixes it very very very evil. So the verse is more about being under the control or being a willing servant of evil. YMMV.

    whether or not you believe them it is important that you at least respect them.

    Well if youre going to tell me what to do I'll do the same. Respect yourself by being informed of more than just the fundamentalist view of things.

    There are real reasons to go against treating humans as well-watched cattle, but this isn't one of them.

  58. The launch will be in Europe and South America by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is that? Are these nations more acceptable to control devices?

    Example, the UK already has the worlds highest CCTV count and Europe's culture very orderely and controled.

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  59. MRI's by MikeLRoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guess everyone who has one of these will be unable to get an MRI (since it will probably have to have metal in it). For those who don't know, MRI's and pacemakers aren't compatible since MRI's user super-huge magnets for scanning.

    --
    -Michael Roy Some people are like Slinkies. Not really useful, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down
  60. You're absolutely right! by Micah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead,
    so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.
    -- Revelation 13:16-17

    We now have technology to make that happen!

    1. Re:You're absolutely right! by SirNonya · · Score: 1

      Yes. Have you ever read the Left Behind series (in particular, the Mark)?

    2. Re:You're absolutely right! by Micah · · Score: 2

      Yes, I sure have! Great series!!!

      Haven't read Desecration yet. Will probably get it for Christmas.

    3. Re:You're absolutely right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you study the word further, you'll find that the "mark"
      is not a computer chip. It means you were deceved by the
      Anti-christ when he comes, deceving people
      into believing he is Jesus (compltere with supernatural
      abilities), before the true one returns. Having
      the "mark" on your head means you have
      been decived by false teachings, and you fall for the
      Anti-christ. The mark in your hand means you are
      spreading this deception. It's not a literal
      mark, and has nothing to do with computer chips or
      barcodes.

      That aside, I wouldn't allow the gov't to inject
      me with a chip because (a) Gov't have a history
      of abuse with this kind of technology (b) I
      am sure as hell not going to be tagged like some cattle.
      Who do they think they are doing this to
      people?

    4. Re:You're absolutely right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except there is no "The Antichrist" as a personal entity. People who believe that are more likely than not going to turn against Jesus himself when he returns. Either way, don't you think you should study more deeply and find out?

      http://www.bbie.org/WrestedScriptures/B10Antichris t/History.html
      http://www.antipas.org/books/revelation_pearce/rev p_toc.html

    5. Re:You're absolutely right! by Micah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well you're right that the primary purpose of the mark is a symbol of (misdirected) worship. However, due to the nature of the one world government, it *does* seem likely that it will be a literal mark. In a cashless society, it would be quite easy for said government to require a scan of the mark for any transaction, thus being consistent with the scripture saying that the mark is required for anyone to buy or sell.

      No generation before us would have had technology to do that, and that was my point.

      There are an astounding number of other things, technologically and otherwise, that are required for the fulfillment of prophecy in Daniel and Revelation that are possible or practical for our generation and NO generation before us!

      Please see this article for more info: The Signs of the Times

    6. Re:You're absolutely right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend the Christ Clone series as well. Really good stuff.

    7. Re:You're absolutely right! by statusbar · · Score: 2

      What if they put it in your left hand? Would it not satisfy the requirements then?

      Armageddon could be delayed!

      --jeff

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    8. Re:You're absolutely right! by Lord+Custos · · Score: 1

      This whole "implanting" thing sounds painful. I still have bad memories of when the Ef-Bee_Aye burned that barcode into the back of my neck. It really hurt. They didn't even offer me a local. This time I'm gonna demand they gimme a shot of novacaine. and a band aid for the boo-boo. Maybe a squirt of Bactine or some of that Wintermint rubbing alcohol to sterilize the wound. Heh.

    9. Re:You're absolutely right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Fear not at all; fear neither men nor Fates, no gods, nor anything. Money fear not, nor laughter of the folk folly, nor any other power in heaven or upon the earth or under the earth. Nu is your refuge as Hadit your light; and I am the strength, force, vigour, of your arms.

      "Mercy let be off: damn them who pity! Kill and torture; spare not; be upon them!"

      Liber al vel Legis, chapter three, verses seventeen and eighteen

    10. Re:You're absolutely right! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1
      And please, don't you atheists drone on about how Christians are supposed to be pacificts, loving, caring, and above all, against violence. If I have to choose to follow the Bible and God's commandments contained therein (such as not taking the mark of the Beast as described in the above quotation), then Big Brother can implant that chip on my forehead or hand when he hacks it off of my cold dead, firearm carrying body.

      That's right, I will fight to the death, the requirement to carry some implant/tattoo/'mark' on my person! Treating the common man like a common criminal provides us with neither liberty, nor security.

    11. Re:You're absolutely right! by uninet · · Score: 1

      I was just going to post the same thing Micah. Gives me chills thinking about this.

      --
      -------------
      "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
    12. Re:You're absolutely right! by uninet · · Score: 1

      Descration is very good so far. I'm having a hard time rationing my reading of it. ;-)

      --
      -------------
      "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
    13. Re:You're absolutely right! by sketerpot · · Score: 2
      And please, don't you atheists drone on about how Christians are supposed to be pacificts, loving, caring, and above all, against violence.

      Unless I'm mistaken, most of the time we point out that only a few Christians are really as loving, caring, etc. as they often claim. It can deflate people preaching at you pretty nicely.

      Treating the common man like a common criminal provides us with neither liberty, nor security.

      It's good to see that I'm not the only one who truly cares about this sort of thing. And you're right. Most of us aren't criminals, and we shouldn't be treated like it. By the way, if you'd like some of those bomb-making instuctions censors are always warning about, just read Steal This Book.

    14. Re:You're absolutely right! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1
      Heh. Well, while I would call in to question the moral arguments of that book link, it had some interesting stuff none-the-less.

      As for liberty, this country was founded partly on the ideals that each individual is inherantly granted the right to protect, defend, and 'make' themselves. Sure, that can lead to plenty of corruption as people try to 'make' themselves at the inhumane expense of other people (lying, cheating, stealing), but ultimately, aren't we all a bunch of liers, cheats, and thieves at heart, even if in just small ways? It's leveraging each individuals selfish tendencies against everyone else's selfish tendencies. I personally trust myself, and you, and everyone else to make the decisions of what's right for ourselves. Giving some arbitrary leader and/or committee to try to tell us how to live is rather ridiculous, as they are just as inherrantly selfish on an individual level as we all are.

      Let us all use our tools how we see fit, I say. If that means I see fit to carry my AR-15 with me on every plane ride, so be it. No one is guaranteed to be living in the next minute as we all have weaknesses and can easily die of any number of things. I just think that treating me as if I was responsible for 9-11-01's events is an insult to my overall better behavior than the 19 terrorists who actually committed such heinous acts. And if anyone else thinks about doing such on a plane in the future, I would prefer to have the tools to stop them dead in their tracks of killing hundreds, by being able to kill one or two with a few well placed shots to the throat. Don't you?

      (P.S. The last question is rhetorical; yes, I agree with your sentiments on liberty and freedom.)

    15. Re:You're absolutely right! by Micah · · Score: 1

      yep! I've read the other books in 4 or 5 days each!

    16. Re:You're absolutely right! by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      I've read books 1-6 already. I just got The Indwelling and Desecration for Christmas. I might get The Mark next weekend, giving me the complete set, at least until #10 comes out next year.

      Personally I think Peretti's Darkness books are written better, but the Left Behind books have a message to share that the Darkness books don't.

  61. sick bastage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too bad i don't trust the company i work for or the govt.

  62. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by simetra · · Score: 1

    How is carrying ID a violation of rights? Now, you have to provide at least a drivers license to board a plane. Are your rights being violated? Boo Hoo!
    Who cares? Why is this considered a violation of rights?
    So what if you can be tracked. If you're a criminal, bummer.
    What if you're buried in an avalanche. I bet you'd be damn glad to have a tracking device inside you then.
    Really... the only people who object to this are those with something to hide.
    Those who are found guilty of crimes DO deserve to lose rights. It's called punishment. It's called responsibility for one's own actions. I'm not a criminal, so I say, tag me, what do I care?

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  63. metal detectors by greenriot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless this microchip was completely nonmetallic, I would assume that it would set off any metal detectors in airports, government buildings, etc. Given the sensitivity of those things, you'd think that putting a mandatory amount of metal in a person's body would cause problems with scanning for legitimate weapons. If decreased the sensitivity of the machines so that they wouldn't be set off by these microchips, you could risk missing things being smuggled into the secure area. However, if you didn't increase sensitivity, then you'd have to hand search every person going into the secure area, which just wouldn't be practical. I don't see how this ID microchip would help ensure safety if it acts in this manner. Not to mention the fact that the human body would probably reject the microchip in the same way that it rejects transplant organs and any other foreign object. And then there's the fact that a good portion of people probably don't want one of these things in their body in the first place, but I suppose that part doesn't matter...it's for the good of the team after all...or something.

  64. If the USA is this stupid by drrobin_ · · Score: 1

    If the USA is stupid enough to do this, I won't stop them. I'm a citizen of the states, but as of late, I've been getting fed up with all the stupid shit happening.

    I'm willing to bet that nearly all of the USA's best and brightest are getting fed up, too.

    If something like this is implemented, do you know what I'll do? I'll move to some nice liberal socialist country in Europe, that respects my rights. I'll take my expertise and ability with me. I won't be the only one.

    It's never a good idea to chase out your elite citizenry. Spain tried with their inquisition, and all chasing the Jews out did was crash their economy and end their empire. I see a similar future for the USA if they try this.

    --
    to accept the praise of personal wisdom is an affront to the very ideal i hold dear.
    1. Re:If the USA is this stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'll move to some nice liberal socialist country in Europe, that respects my rights."

      BWAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA..

      "liberal socialist"
      "that respects my rights"

      BWAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA....

  65. I have a better idea! by HongPong · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Let's just tattoo optical barcodes on everyone's wrists!

    The launch will be in Europe and South America.

    Oh, starting in Europe yet again? Quiet outlying areas of Poland, perhaps?

    I will never take one of these things, as long as I live. Ever.

  66. Your rights online? by tunah · · Score: 1
    I thought the whole point of this story was that is was happening in meatspace. What about a YRIRL topic.

    I think we should have a topic dedicated to my really important rodent lab :)

    --
    Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  67. Actually... by anzha · · Score: 1

    I don't support the idea of an ID chip. THAT gives me the heebee geebees in a big way!

    However, how many people wouldn't mind having some personal uplinks or implanted chips in general? I'll ahve to say, yeah, I'd go for that. One frivolous use would be to read Usenet on the way to work on the BART. One not so frivilous use would be to be able to notified in a manner that is nonobvious to anyone else of information. No annoying cell phone call in the middle of a movie. Exchange info a lot faster, etc. :)

    Day trading goes on unapparently. heh. heh.

    The important thing, above and beyond all else, is that I have control over said implants. No backdoors for anyone - feds included!

    Damn, if I won't need one HELL of a firewall. ;)

    --
    Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
  68. Part of DoJ vs. MS settlement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't be surprised if MS and other IP industries are overjoyed at the prospect that now only registered (*cough*paying*cough) customers will be eligible to use their products via product activation codes.

  69. Re:Hahahaha!! by visualight · · Score: 1

    The SSN is voluntary but to make it less so, the gov't gives a tax break to parents who register they're children. You'd think that Mom and Dad would put they're children first, or at least allow them to grow up and decide, but they don't. Same thing here, they'll just have some financial incentive for implantation and it'll happen.

    Thanks Dad.

    --
    Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
  70. Will it be shaped like a star or triangle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will be used to track and identify criminals, I work with some one who suggests that if you have nothing to hide what's the problem?
    If we look back at the more aggressive governments of the past we find that some have made being homosexual or Jewish illegal. People like the nazis, or the state government of Tasmania, Australia(until very recently), but I'm sure that we can trust our governments these days to ignore the victimless crimes of today (A bit of dope here, some drunk and disorderly there), surely.
    I can't help but feel that all the time there are reactionaries and bigots being put into power and all the time there are crimes on the books that aren't really crimes this will be a bad thing.

  71. By the power of Godwin's Law... by sconeu · · Score: 2


    Yeah, let's just tattoo serial numbers on everyone's forearms!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  72. Fuck This... by Jordan+Block · · Score: 1

    ...I'm moving to mars.

  73. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is people like you that are responseblefore fore the creation of all police states . But as long as you are not a criminal and dont disagree whith the gouvernment about anything and dont have a mind of your own you you wont be affected . So i guess YOU are fine .

  74. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by mentin · · Score: 1

    You will care when government start using those IDs for purposes other then stated. How many times FBI was spying for opposition parties by the order of US presidents? Heard stories about IRS employes selling individual's tax information?

    Any power that is given to goverment will be abused some time, and this is the reason to avoid giving them this power.

    Otherwise, you will end wearing video cameras that will record all you actions, movements and talks 24 hours a day, and passes them to gov. - just so that gov. agencies can be sure you did not commit any crime. Are you OK with that? Why, you are not a criminal, you have nothing to hide!

    --
    MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
  75. Won't happen in current U.S. by Micah · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    It won't happen in the US as we have it today.

    My understanding of prophecy is along these lines:

    1. Spiritual forces start aligning the nations of the world to be more united in government and religion -- the UN and others are working on this now.

    2. The Church (all true believers in Jesus) will be instantly raptured and will simply disappear from the earth.

    3. Shortly after that, the Antichrist will sign a 7-year peace agreement with Israel. He will put the finishing touches on the world government.

    4. Halfway through that 7-year period, he will be killed and rise again, indwelt by Satan himself.

    5. THAT is when the Mark comes into play. People all over the world will be fascinated by his resurrection, and wooed by his false miracles. They will gladly accept this Mark.

    Times will be *completely* different then.

    1. Re:Won't happen in current U.S. by Auxon · · Score: 1

      That's one interpretation. Another interpretation is that there is no "rapture", otherwise how could the Antichrist "wage war against the saints"??

      The "rapture" idea is unsupported by scripture. The only place anything like it is mentioned, is by Paul when he says that Christ will come at the "last trumpet" and draw the saints to meet him in the air. If you look at the sequence of events in Matthew when Jesus speaks about coming, he talks about the destruction and tribulation before He returns.

    2. Re:Won't happen in current U.S. by Micah · · Score: 2
      now THIS is a fun thing to debate on Slashdot. :-)

      Well I've read various interpretations and then read the Bible for myself. I *do* think most evidence points toward a pre-trib rapture:
      • Surprise element. The Bible says we will be changed in the "twinkling of an eye" and Jesus will "come like a theif". This is so we will always be ready. If it happened at the end of the tribulation, we would not be surprised when it happened.
      • It should be noted that Paul's "Last Trumpet" does NOT equal the seventh trumpet of Revelation. Revelation was revealed to John about 30 years after Paul's death! He would not have known about those trumpets.
      • These saints that the Antichrist will wage war against are the Tribulation Saints, those who will be saved AFTER the rapture. Revelation 7:9-14 seems to attest to this, saying that "a great multitude that no one could count" of saints will come out of the Tribulation.
      • God's plan for the Trublation -- the final 7 years of human history on earth -- is to punish the unbelievers and give them a final chance to repent before REAL punishment. He NEVER intended to punish believers, and it is consistent throughout Scripture that God's wrath falls only upon those who reject Him. Compare with the plagues on the ancient Egyptions -- they did not affect the Israelites!

      That's what I can think of off the top of my head. There are some great resources on this for further reading. I recommend this article: "The Rapture of the Church". It says most of what I've said and tons more!
    3. Re:Won't happen in current U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Won't happen in current U.S. by Auxon · · Score: 1

      Jesus spoke about the angels blowing the trumpet to call the saints, so Paul would know the teaching.

      Tribulation is not about punishment, I agree. During the Tribulation the saints undergo the trial of their lives, but those who remain faithful go unharmed; aside from being killed by humans that is - they go unharmed by the plagues and judgements sent by God, etc .... Remember that dying isn't supposed to be a big deal for Christians.

      I will also compare the Tribulation with the plagues in Egypt - the Israelites were THERE. They were only taking out AFTER the plagues. So your comparison is accurate for the Tribulation as well.

      The idea that there is a pre-tribulation rapture is for scared Christians who don't want to believe that they may have to suffer. There are countless Christians suffering their own tribulation right now in places like Afganistan (remember the missionaries?) and all over the world. They suffer but is it punishment? No. They die for what they believe in, and the way they do it (non-violent, non-coercive, loving, trying to help people, is the important thing (not all are this way, and they are wrong, IMHO)).

      I think that Matthew and Luke make it very clear when Jesus speaks about His return, that He meant that the only escape from tribulation (now, in your own personal life, and the Great Trib for mankind) is faith or death.

      I used to read those Rapture books and then I read scripture and came to the conclusion that it's just "feel good" preaching. The hard truth is that life involves suffering.

      The "twinkling of the eye" is taken out of context. Paul was talking about the transformation of a person's body into a heavenly body, and how it would happen instantly, not the coming of Jesus. Look it up, I can't remember the chapter and verse.

      Also Jesus said, "like a thief in the night" when talking about how a person can never know for sure when they will die. Take a look.

    5. Re:Won't happen in current U.S. by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      "2. The Church (all true believers in Jesus) will be instantly raptured and will simply disappear from the earth."

      Sweet. Rush hour traffic will be a thing of the past. When is this rapture gonna happen again?

    6. Re:Won't happen in current U.S. by Micah · · Score: 2

      uh yeah. The Rapture will solve all kinds of problems -- traffic as you say, overcrowding, overpopulation, bandwidth clogs, etc.

      As long as you don't mind replacing them with minor things like widespread chaos as planes and cars crash due to sudden lack of drivers, nuclear war as the one world government takes control, etc. I'm sure it will be a blast!

      As for when....... who knows, but I think it's getting close!

  76. how would a terrorist GET an ID card? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


    Ok if only US citizens get the card. That means only US citizens have the card, so those who arent are either terrorists, illegal aliens, or criminals of some sort. Or of course they simply lost their card.

    Either way people without the card will be harrassed by the police just like you get harrassed for driving without a license. How many people drive without a license? Some, but most have them.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:how would a terrorist GET an ID card? by lazarius · · Score: 1

      Ok if only US citizens get the card. That means only US citizens have the card, so those who arent are either terrorists, illegal aliens, or criminals of some sort. Or of course they simply lost their card.

      How then would I travel from Canada to the States, unless you guys want to close your borders? Would there be some form of "Traveller's ID"? This, then, defeats the stated purpose.

      MIKE

      --
      Beware the JabberOrk.
    2. Re:how would a terrorist GET an ID card? by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Two words: Russian mafia. I understand their counterfeit currency is good enough to fool all but the experts.

      The bottom line is that if they can manufacture it, so can they.

      Also, money talks. How much does the guy who runs the ID machine make? Multiply it by 2, throw in a Summer home and death threats to anyone who squeals. Don't believe me? When they finally caught some of these guys who sold us out to the Soviets, it was usually for less than $1 million over the course of 10 years. That's a lot to you and me, but it's nothing to a government who wants to screw us over.

      The only way to really prevent terrorism is good old fashion leg work, diplomacy, and military force. There is a time and place for each of these tactics.

      So, Larry Elison and The Beast, go peddle your snake oil someplace else.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  77. Interesting for me, anyway by TACD · · Score: 1
    The launch will be in Europe and South America.

    Now on the one hand, that means that most of you people here can stop freaking out. For once it's not America letting all hell break loose. However, I live in Europe, and while I'm not entirely sure who they hope to sell this daft thing to, it raises interesting issues (for me at least) to do with international travel. I happen to be a citizen of both America and England; so if I decide to buy one of these things, how can I be sure that the US won't illegally steal my information when I travel? Would it even be illegal? In fact, when walking through the airport scanners, might it get picked up and I would be rendered pereptually unable to travel?

    It's all very well to panic about Big Brother and co., but do remember that this isn't actually happening in America (yet). And if it did, you would move to Canada or somewhere, yeah? :-)

    --
    Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
    1. Re:Interesting for me, anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See...freakn slashdot...nothing but eurotrash and commies these days...

      "I live in Europe, and while I'm not entirely sure who they hope to sell this daft thing to"

      I guess they'd just make you use it dumbass,much like the thousands of cameras that track you 24/7...DUH...

      "how can I be sure that the US won't illegally steal my information when I travel"

      See what i mean...europe sticks a camera up your ass and it's just fine...but the US..they're all evil..they'll steal your info...gaawwddd

    2. Re:Interesting for me, anyway by TACD · · Score: 1
      --See...freakn slashdot...nothing but eurotrash and commies these days...

      Oops, perhaps you missed the part where I pointed out that I am also American. Whoo, guess who looks stupid now.

      --I guess they'd just make you use it dumbass,much like the thousands of cameras that track you 24/7

      I think you should read the article before making foolish snide remarks: They repeatedly talk about their efforts to 'market' the chip, and the sales revenues the expect. If you're forcing people to use something you hardly have to market it, and you certainly don't sell it.

      --See what i mean...europe sticks a camera up your ass and it's just fine...but the US..they're all evil..they'll steal your info...gaawwddd

      Pretty much, yeah. You live there, I would have figured you'd know by now. England may have crappy broadband access, but last time I chekced it wasn't funding the real IRA, fixing votes and repealing human rights while proclaiming itself to be the 'land of the free'. Glad I moved out when I did.

      --
      Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
  78. this will eliminate the black market by voisine · · Score: 1

    This chip could be used to streamline all
    financial transactions. Who needs cash or credit
    cards anyway? They only serve to make you a target for muggers.

    Just think, no more bank or convenience store
    robberies. Illegal street transactions would be
    reduced to barter. No more drugs, prostitution,
    illegal sales to minors. Think of the benefit to
    society. The black market could be completely
    eliminated, something no free society has ever
    been able to do, and at such a small cost! Wow.

    I suppose if one doesn't have a right hand to
    implant the chip into, due to a birth defect or
    accident, one could always use the forehead.
    Everyone has a forehead.

    l8r
    Aaron

    1. Re:this will eliminate the black market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I LIKE drugs, prostitution,
      and illegal sales to minors.

  79. I am all for it. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Maybe this would be the catylist to start the long overdue second civil war this country has needed for about 60 years. Please adda forhead Barcode tattoo and even add public impalement of those that go against the current political party (ok so they are all the same really)

    This country needs somthing to get the damned sheep we call citizens off our collective comfy chairs and do something.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I am all for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah it would be the south vs North vs West. To bad the south would lose agine. And I think ca could take on the us alone and win,

    2. Re:I am all for it. by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, let's destroy the country so that we can save it.

      It's much better to work withing the system and steer it back to its constitutional roots. Why? Well, if we destroy the U.S. first, the Constitution goes with it. Then it all gets replaced with something else. But what?

      "Pat Robertson"
      "Hillary Clinton"
      "Rush Limbaugh"
      "Larry Ellison"
      Etc.

      Who, these days, would actually stand up for what's recorded in our Declaration of Independance and Constitution? The U.S. was born in the Age of Enlightenment, where people cherish Man's ability to reason, where they valued personal freedom and accountability; where they would even pledge their lives, fortunes and sacred honor to achieve those things. Today? A bunch of cowards eager to spend someone else's money, and tenured chowderheads dreaming up new entitlements.

      Feh.

      Enforce the Constitution. That's all it will take. Even Madison, one of the guys who wrote it, said that 'one day this country will live up to its principles' -- or something like that. Eternal vigilence, etc. Freedom is not free! You have to pay for it every day.

      We get the country described in the Constitution only if we work to make it that way. We get to keep it only if we work to defend it.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    3. Re:I am all for it. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      you are very wrong, you really need to re-read your history.

      The constitution and decleration of independance was written during very vile times. The english rule were imposing silly rule after silly rule designed exclusively for the opression and robbery of the people in the colonies. The Boston Tea Party was an excellent uprising against tynarry of companies that corrupted the government that was in place.

      in 1776 we fought viciously to break the bonds of tynarry and abuse of power from the government that was in place at that time. and alas it seems that our current government has also reached the critical mass that caused many uprisings. The French Revolution, The United States revolution, etc...

      Revolutions are not caused by small tresspasses on a few small rights. They are caused by a build of that abuse and a catalyst trigger that set's it off. Any type of national implant ID could very well be that catalyst and I hope to God that it is if it ever happens.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  80. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by Silver222 · · Score: 1
    The mere fact that you have an ID is not a violation of rights. As soon as you are required to carry it at all time, it sure as hell is. As soon as a cop can come up to me and say, "Papers please" anytime he wants to, you kinda run into the fourth amendment.


    The avalanche thing is about the lamest argument I've ever heard for this, by the way. You obviously have never seen an avalanche tranceiver. Of course, if you do want one of those implanted, just bend over. I'd be happy to shove it up your ass for you.

    --
    "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." Bill Hicks
  81. Solution, No ID card, No job! by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    Thats right, you can only get a job if you have a national ID card. You can only buy from a store if you have a national ID card because you need the card to access all banks.

    IF one card was given to every American. All who dont have the card are now suspects.

    Its that simple.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Solution, No ID card, No job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've been reading your posts. you're a sick fascist fuck-head. i just wanted to make sure someone told you.

    2. Re:Solution, No ID card, No job! by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Ah, so those of us who pay cash for a large number of our purchases are what then, SOL? How about tourists? Oh wait, we're ignoring that effect on the economy, right?

      Couple other factors:

      1) Lost cards. Details and bureaucracy for replacements.
      2) Forgeries. Trust me, it can and will be done.
      3) Assumed 100% compliance. That won't happen either. I personally don't want a national ID card, as enough people ask for my damn SSN as it stands when they don't need it.

      Just my $0.02

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    3. Re:Solution, No ID card, No job! by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



      1. Lost cards will happen, buy a replacement.

      2. Forgeries will be possible, but it will be VERY VERY difficult to get someone elses DNA, family information, work information, bank codes, and everything else needed to create a card which will pass through all the scanners.

      3. with the card your number will never be shared with anyone, it will go into a machine in encrypted form along with other information, getting a job will be as simple as swiping the card through the scanner, no papers to sign. Paying bills will be as simple as using the card. Buying from stores will be as simple as pulling out and using the card. The information will be transfered via a special secure internet developed by the government, similar to what the banks use currently.

      Hackable? Its possible, but it will never be done because the effort involved and the risk and punishment for doing it will be far too great.

      Software provided for these cards should not be open source by software created by the NSA which is kept as closed source and top secret as possible. As much as i like open source, some software is better off being closed source, in the same way some of our best weapons for war are classified and go unused unitil we need to use it. Closed source very secret software will make it impossible to reverse engineer. And the hardware should not be documented, let the government handle it instead of Microsoft, and other stupid companies.

      It makes no sense to me if we are building software to protect ourselves from terrorists, that we should have the terrorists actually coding the software, believe it or not, its rumored terrorists purposely coded backdoors in XP and from what ive heard recently, its seems there actually are backdoors in XP.

      While this could happen to our government, I really doubt you will find any terrorists in the NSA.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    4. Re:Solution, No ID card, No job! by botik32 · · Score: 1

      You, Sir, seem to be the person who believes technology would solve the basic human problems. Believe me, it does not. When TV was to become mainstream it was predicted it would end war and famine.

      Please do yourself a favour, find the "Watchbird" story by Robert Sheckley and read it. It might save you a lot of trouble.

      On another hand, maybe you are just one of those adequacy.org lads who seem to enjoy twisting facts and committing logical fallacies...

    5. Re:Solution, No ID card, No job! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      "1. Lost cards will happen, buy a replacement."

      How long will it take to get that replacement? When my ATM card was stolen, it took over a week to get a new one. Luckily I had enough cash to get through, but in a cashless system I would have been SOL!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  82. HOLY BLACK SHIT! by Vidmaster_Steve · · Score: 2, Informative
    Revelations 13:17 (if I'm not mistaken) says, in a nutshell, that only he who bears the name of the Beast or the number of the name of the Beast is allowed to make purchases.
    The Intel Inside logo (well, back in the 486 days) looked an awful lot like a red 6.
    Ergo, if we have Intel tracking chips inside of us, and Intel Inside tatoos on the outside... And only be able to make sales... Oh shit... We're through the looking glass here people. Now that we've stumbled across their little conspiracy, all our lives are in danger. Yours, mine, even the life of the complacent and idiotic Joe Sixpacks out there, who will willingly and enthusiastically get this little red (now blue, as if that would throw us off the track. ha!) 6 tatooed upon their buttocks.
    This terrifying New World Order that Bush threatened back in '91 is beginning to rear its festering black head. I'm not sure if we, as a society will be able to handle the massive upheaval, this horrendous expulsion of civil liberties...

    Oh no, in my agitated state, I seem to have knocked off my special wave-nullifying helmet. Now FEMA knows where I am, and their black helicopters will begin their inexorable swoop down onto my location. I've only moments before the elite paramilitary units rappell through my windows.

    SLASHDOTTERS! MAKE SURE MY MESSAGE IS SPREAD THROUGHT THE LAND!

    Now, If you'll excuse me, my Kalashnikov and I have a date with those who dare edit out Article Five of our Great Bill of Rights...

    --
    Why is it when I hit ^R that ZSH calls me a cocksucker?
    1. Re:HOLY BLACK SHIT! by Storm+Damage · · Score: 1
      It's been done...Check out the ID Chip!.

      Of course, that was a hoax from years ago...Here's the explanation. Funny as hell when it came out, though.

  83. I WANT ONE OF THESE!! by FFFish · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    For my neighbour, that is, and with a simple modification: I want to be able to press a button on a remote control, and zap the bastard.

    Starting at midnight last night, the S.O.B. started playing his car stereo at ungodly decibel levels. Pictures on my wall were rattling. And when I phoned in the complaint to the cops, did they show? Hell, no: not in the hour and a half they had to come by and experience it all!

    So I want something embedded into this moron, that I can control. Swear to god, if he acts like a reasonably decent human being, I'll never, ever press the button. But pull another stunt like he did last night, and he can writhe on the ground screaming in electronic agony.

    I, of course, don't need an implant. I never piss people off. :-)

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:I WANT ONE OF THESE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since the cops don't show, couldn't you just go over there and beat his ass? Or if you're prefer a more indirect approach, how about visiting a pay phone and having all his utilities turned off? Or put a little copper chlorate on his tyres? Or replace all his CD's with burned copies of the soundtrack from Barney. Be creative!

      ~~~

    2. Re:I WANT ONE OF THESE!! by FFFish · · Score: 1

      The guy isn't all there: there's a vacant look in his eyes that kinda indicates he isn't firing on all six cylinders. I think his tiny little confused brain sees red a lot. Messing with him face-to-face isn't much of an option, not if I value my property and safety.

      He's living proof that inbreeding isn't just a bad idea, it's against the laws of nature.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:I WANT ONE OF THESE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure where you live - this could be illegal in your jurisdiction... caveat emptor and all that...

      Search Google for info on a spark gap transmitter.

      Assuming that the swine is actually listening to the radio, a properly constructed SGT should induce enough static into the signal to give the speakers a real nice jolt... Will probably blow 'em...

      If it's not a radio transmission *sigh*, then how about bumper stickers? Wait till he goes somewhere that isn't watched by cameras and put one on the front and rear bumpers... Things like "I support the KKK", "Member: Cop Killers of (insert country)", "I hate niggers" and so on ought to do the trick for getting his ass kicked, or getting him arrested...

    4. Re:I WANT ONE OF THESE!! by FFFish · · Score: 2

      LOL! And the scary thing is, he probably wouldn't remove them. And he'd never, ever put two-and-two together: the boy seems utterly ignorant of how his behaviour creates his problems.

      It's not radio, alas. If I could rig up a directional EMP, though...

      Blowing his speakers remotely, while not blowing out the speakers of anyone who's behaving responsibly. Neat concept. :-)

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  84. We didnt have the technology back thenn by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    How can you fake someones DNA? your DNA is in the card.

    All your other information is in the card, all on a chip, which can be scanned, the chips data is totally encrypted so only the special government scanner can read it. IT also has a finger print, and both your family members names no the card. It tells your DNA makeup, a retina scan print, everything all on one card, all your history.

    While someone can fake a card, and maybe even the chip, without the proper codes, and the information, even if just the DNA doesnt match the finger print, you are screwed.

    Not to mention they can set it to have a random number which changes every minute and lock the card unless you enter the number.

    This has the potential to be VERY secure.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by ratzmilk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But, wouldn't the 4GB Hard Disk needed to store the DNA information leave a big lump under your skin? And tell me, when (and I do mean when) the chip fails, will you be left strandard, unable to withdraw your money from the bank. Or unable to buy a subway ticket to get home because your chip has failed.

      We don't have the technology now, nor are we ever likely to have such technology. The day Micro$oft can write software that doesn't crash, will be the day that this sort of technology will be reliable enough to trust in this sort of roll.

      Not going to happen in our lifetimes (the reliablity bit, not the implants, that's a certainty).

      --
      I wish I could think of a witty Sig. Sigh!
    2. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that the peole who hijaked the planes was not under any restrictions not to travell and would not have been stopped right ? The US is turning into a police state and people have never been safe in any police state no matter how much surveilence is putt on them . In Nazi-germany or the soviet union for example , the people had tons of surveilence on them at all times and they still where not safe.

    3. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



      No it wouldnt be on the skin i said ID CARD!!! Also FMD technology already allows smart cards which hold well over 4 gigs.

      Storage isnt a problem anyhow because we are talking government technology here. The cpu isnt a problem. The scanner isnt a problem. The card may cost like $40 or so so you better not lose it.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    4. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I consider myself a Libertarian and am a bit disturbed at the recent power grabs, but WTF, I see people like Harry Browne on TV all angry about this shit, but when asked, can not think of any other solution. I see this as a time when reality gets in the way of my ideology.

    5. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by ratzmilk · · Score: 1

      The problem is the technology itself. It isn't reliable enough to entrust peoples lives to it.

      And if you think it is reliable enough, then I ask you to answer honestly, would you fly on an airliner that had microsoft software running on every computer system on the aircraft?

      Remember when Airbus was raving about how safe there computer controlled fly by wire systems where, until a couple of A320's dropped out of the sky.

      Of cource, the ones you can definatly rely on to work perfectly, will be the forged/false/fake ID cards used by terrorists/criminals/insurance salesmen.

      Until the GIGO law of computing is rescinded, and some new form of computational mechanics is invented, using technology in the manner you describe, will not produce the desired results of security and peace of mind that you so desire.

      --
      I wish I could think of a witty Sig. Sigh!
    6. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

      Okay, so your DNA matches the DNA recorded on the card. So what? If the card says you are Barbara Streisand and you are not, so long as the DNA matches yours, people have to assume you are Barbara Streisand. And don't give any guff about the private key used to sign the secure hash of the DNA and the name. If you spend enough money (like the kind of money a Barbara Streisand has) you can bribe, steal, copy, generate, whatever, a valid signature. Its all a question of cost/benefit.

      The entire notion that knowing identity secures us is idiotic. So you know who someone is. Unless you can read his mind, predict his future actions, know the depth of his character through knowing his identity, I don't see that it does much. Freedom is too great a price for such imperfect security.

    7. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin

    8. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by sketerpot · · Score: 2

      Reality need not get in the way of your ideology. ESR wrote this piece shortly after the plane crashes, and it is still relevant.

    9. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by keflex · · Score: 0

      Uh, yes... many ppl have the same DNA code as Barbara Streisand, just as it's very simple to forge fingerprints.

      Realistically, this type of ID program will not be used in the forseeable future, because people will not stand for it and/or it would require too much work to implement (imagine implanting chips into EVERYONE in the US? And you thought the line for the DMV was long...).

      --


      My karma is -1 because I don't use AC posting. LOL.
    10. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by mgv · · Score: 1

      You don't need to fake it.

      Firstly would such an ID card have prevented the McVeigh bombings? If so, then how?

      Secondly, how do you deal with false ID's from another country. I mean, legitimite ones? I doubt that there would have been any problems in getting the taliban, or pakistan, or many other countries from issuing legitimite ID's. Not to mention good fakes.

      Authentication is only as good as those who certify it. If you use public key cryptography, but the private key has been obtained by stealth/corruption, how do you know. (Alot of 3rd world countries are quite corrupt - how do you prevent some official from selling the codes? You can't even be sure that Ex-USSR scientists arent' selling bombs to Iraq, and they are just unemployed).

      If a countries ID becomes compromised, do you make everyone in the country get a new ID with new encryption?

      Most importantly, facial recognition (and particularly iris recognition) is about to happen. We will have widespread tracking of individuals shortly, whether or not they get an ID chip implanted. The question is how this is managed (legally) in terms of what rights you have. Because it will happen. In fact, it already has been used to identify people on occasions (in the UK at football matches IIRC)

      Food for thought.

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    11. Re:We didnt have the technology back thenn by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

      You miss my point. My point is that it is the association of the DNA with a name that is easily forged. If I could get the (false) association made between between my DNA and Barbara Streisand's name and I could get that association certified (and don't you think the clerk whose job this is could be bought for a couple of million dollars?), then you would have to call me Barbara, wouldn't you?

      DNA is certain alright. But who says what name goes with my DNA? I'm saying that can be forged.

      They used to keep fingerprints in card catalogs. If I pulled my fingerprint card, cut off the top and typed up a new header that said "Streisand, Barbara" then when you took my prints, you'd have to call me Barbara then too.

      All I'm trying to say is that there is NO magic identity bullet; just because I can't change my fingerprints or my DNA does not mean that I can't get you to associate an incorrect identity with that unchangable attribute.

  85. How About This by nexex · · Score: 1

    How about only congressmen have these (heh, then we will see how popular they are in congress)... then we could really see how often they are getting "extra-ciricular" activities with them.

    --
    Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
  86. The two worst things you could be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the terrorist ID cards have "TERRORIST" across the picture diagonally, like some states do with "MINOR" on driver's licenses?

    Interesting juxtaposition. What are the most important things someone might want to know about you when looking at your driver's license?

    • You might be a terrorist.
    • You might be less than 21 years of age.

    The U.S.A. limits the rights of both kinds of people, but until this September, routine ID checks were only designed to catch one of them. Which one?

    Now would be a good time to read David Deutsch's article The Final Prejudice.

    1. Re:The two worst things you could be by alecto · · Score: 1

      That was an interesting read--thanks!

  87. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by cl0secall · · Score: 1

    Can't remember the site, but there was an essay I read awhile back. The author said that this type of argument is one of the most common, and one of the most stupid arguments against privacy. Come to think of it I think it was an article on PGP and banning cryptography. Though I haven't flown on a plane in a long time, there's no way in hell you'd get me to show ID just to get on. If I have the ticket, that's all I should need.

    Bottom line is, it's not just privacy -- it's assumption of guilt until proven otherwise, which, mind you, IS in the constitution.

    --
    Model 551, Chambered in 6mm
  88. Have you hacked into the FBI or the US government? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    Hell no, its not unhackable but its secure enough where no one will have the money to hack it.

    Also, simple, add a number to the card which changes every minute, along with your usual password, the cpu chooses a random number. Now even if someone hacks into the system how exactly would you guess the number thats on the card, so how would you guess the number on the card if you need the cards number to access the data on the system?

    Simple, the chip can be hacked, but even with a hacked chip and card, you can add security measures into the device which scans the card. My point is the government has more money than terrorist hackers and can make the information secure enough where it would take millions of dollars just to get info from one card. Kinda like its difficult to rob a bank but still possible.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  89. First application by heikkile · · Score: 2
    transmit medical data ... tracking beacons ... personal ID

    Just what an ambulance chasing lawyer needs!

    --

    In Murphy We Turst

  90. Shouldnt that read... by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1
    We've mentioned this company's "Digital Angel" before, but there's an understandable sudden interest in such tracking technologies.

    Shouldnt that read Dark Angel instead of Digital Angel???

    This is nothing short of evil, complete tracking and control of a population, this has the potential to be more effective than organised religions during the middle ages...

    I will not submit.

    Am I warped in my mind?
    --
    Does it go on forever?
  91. I'd rather live in a cave... by Niji · · Score: 1

    than be tagged... The first bastard that tries to tag me like this gets shot.

    If the goverment (I'm Dutch btw) ever tries to force this or tries to force people into this by withholding "priviliges", the time will have come for a *#^%&*(%$% revolution...

    So there :-P

    1. Re:I'd rather live in a cave... by mikestro · · Score: 1

      Ya, but how will you do that when you don't have guns to fight back with? he he.

  92. maybe the U.S. military has already prototyped... by sprlmnl · · Score: 1

    this on their unsuspecting masses. It certainly wouldn't be the first time the gov't thought it would be ok to test soldiers|sailors|airmen without their knowledge.

  93. Stupid required subject... by radiashun · · Score: 1

    This would be alright for sex-offenders or other similar criminals, but not for the everyday citizen. It'd be impossible to tag every-single person in the US. What about the homeless lurking in the N.Y.C. subway tunnels?

    I imagine the outcome of something like this would be similar to THE ISLAND OF DR. MOREAU (sp?) where the beasts rip their chips out

    1. Re:Stupid required subject... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Without wanting to open up too much of a can of worms, who says that you have any more rights than someone who's been in jail, served thier sentence, and is now out? Even if that crime was a sex offence. Yadda yadda, first they came for the unionists, etc, etc, but you get the point.

  94. Implants by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

    There will come a day when everyone has implants, including but not limited to tracking devices like this.
    On the day they're forced to receive implants, the last holdouts probably will hear something akin to
    "We are Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. Your biological and technological distinctiveness will be added to our own."
    as the implanters show up at their door.

    I know this is a chilling claim to make about humanity's future, but it's the way I see things going based on ideas and trends now present in society.

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  95. But Grandpa, you don't watch TV by kfg · · Score: 2

    TV watches you.

    KFG

  96. Good info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did not know that. And I suppose that there is no way to turn the device off either...

    1. Re:Good info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I suppose that there is no way to turn the >device off either

      Put it in a thick metal box.

  97. Protect Us. by fathed · · Score: 1

    This will not help the fight against terrorism. We might get them here in the states, and most of the UN countries will probably use them. You think countries like Afganistan would use them? Perhaps we should try to help them get eletricity first.

    If they become mandatory, I'm not paying for one.

    I know who I am, and I don't need to broadcast that to everyone.

    --
    Intelligence is a matter of opinion.
  98. Worse than Bin Laden by Auxon · · Score: 1

    In my mind, this makes the company that wants to implant these chips more terrifying than Bin Laden could ever be, or any and all terrorists ever known.

    I would rather a 100 Bin Laden's than to have this become a law or to become anything close to the necessity of a credit card. Bin Laden can be stopped with bombs and guns, but how can you stop the governments of the world from taking away your life? Even if you tried to fight it, you could not win unless everyone everywhere fought back.

    Essentially, if this became a law I would be declared a criminal for refusing or if it wasn't criminal, end up starving anyways as I couldn't buy anything.

    I think people are seriously underestimating the kind of reaction that people will have against such a device. Governments would indeed have to force people to take these implantations.

  99. Migrating chips by agentZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's one completely practical aspect of all of this which hasn't been mentioned yet. I volunteer with a dog rescue organization which tries to use the chipping technology to match lost pets with their owners. When it works, it's great.

    But the chips, which are usually implanted in the back of the animals neck, can occasionally migrate inside the animal's body. Mostly they just slide down the back, but there have been cases where they just disappear. (I'm sure the chip is in there somewhere, I just don't want to find out...)

    Either way though, if it's possible for the chips to move after implantation, I think the technology needs more work before we start putting them in people.

  100. Three words... by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    NO FUCKING WAY.

  101. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by Pstrobus · · Score: 1

    "if he does nothing wrong, a citizen has no need of privacy." -Hitler

    Thank you for reminding me of that vitally important quote. Note, this does not mean that all folks who want to implant and track are Nazis, it's simply that the Nazis developed a Total State based on suspicion of citizens, preusumption of guilt, and a vast network of internal spies. Hey, as long as you don't do something the government thinks is wrong, you're OK! But what if someone lies about you? What if the government decides that $behaviour is now illegal? Suddenly you're a criminal and we know where you are and we'll have your ass behind bars faster than you can say "first amendment."

    As for criminals "deserving" punishment, that is only valid if the justice system works 100% correctly. But the assumption is utterly false. Look in the mirror and say "OJ did not kill his ex-wife" could you keep a straight face? I didn't think so. Then ask yourself why Illinois decided to give up on the death penalty until full review of all cases (hint: they were finding that a bunch of people were wrongly convicted). Finally, What happens when you have done your time and paid your debt? Does one criminal act mean that you are a criminal by nature? Remember, speeding is against the law. So is underage drinking.

    I certainly don't want to live in your total state where forgiveness and reconciliation are banned. It takes a lot more guts to work with people who have hurt you, ask Desmond Tutu about the Truth and Reconciliation Comittee in South Africa.

    --
    "The conduct of neither [party], if strictly examined, will be irreproachable." -Elizabeth Bennet
  102. How outrageous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no way I am getting one of these, unless they combine it with a 100 gig MP3 player. :P

  103. Shockwave Rider by CatherineCornelius · · Score: 1

    John Brunner would have loved this.

  104. passport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, this is cool, i can't wait to sync this chip with my passport id, then login to hotmail.

  105. Heard about this a month ago by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine said something about this about a month ago, guess now i'll have to beleive him.

    --
    "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
  106. Electro-Magnetic Pulse works wonders by howiefl · · Score: 1

    Well.. they can implant all they want. All i know is if we get tired of it a short EMP (electro-magnetic pulse) will render this chip useless. Bring it on Big Brother!
    http://www.infowar.com/CLASS_3/class3_a.html-ssi

  107. A brandmark for fashion? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    `Of course, we will do this,'' said Saffo of the Silicon Valley-based Institute for the Future And it won't be just for the functionality. It will also be for fashion. You've got a generation that's already piercing themselves. Of course, they're going to put electronics under their skin.'

    Guess they'll bring out Kenzo and Calvin Klein chips soon ...

    You got to be kidding me ...
    I am having a tattoo and a piercing, the tattoo and the piercings are by and for me. In no way I see a ID chip under my skin as fashion
    I see it as a burning mark like they do on cattle.

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  108. What's with this kibo shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does that stand for? Yeah, it is teh SEKRAT, but any guesses? The only one I came up with so far is "you have been there. you have lived. have a nice day." but that's prolly not it, hmm?

    1. Re:What's with this kibo shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:What's with this kibo shit? by MessiahXI · · Score: 1

      dang... smoked you!

  109. The mark of the beast! by nohonor · · Score: 1, Informative

    Its called the Mark of the Beast and without it you will not even be recognized as alive. No food, water or logeing will be given to anyone who doesn't have it.

  110. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by nmos · · Score: 1

    "Really... the only people who object to this are those with something to hide."

    And what exactly is wrong with having something to hide?

  111. We should test 'em by Tri0de · · Score: 1

    in each of the Taliban fighters captured. That way it would set off alarms at any airport any of them ever try to use; without the risk of expermentation of humans.

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
  112. You're all paranoid by simetra · · Score: 1

    Yes, you are required to show ID to get on a plane nowadays.
    You can be stopped by the cops at any moment and forced to present ID.
    You have finger prints, which are kept on file, and some have DNA kept on file.
    What's the big deal?
    Anyway, it seems that there are many, many people who have this knee-jerk reaction "NO! YOU'RE VIOLATING MY RIGHTS!" to anything even remotely related to personal freedom.Really, unless you're committing a crime, why worry? And just because you're paranoid, that doesn't mean that the government is going to become evil one day and decide that you're a criminal, track you down, and bitch-slap you. Get a clue.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:You're all paranoid by arkanes · · Score: 1

      A couple points - you aren't required to carry ID. If an officer asks you for ID, and you have it, you have to show it to him. If you aren't carrying ID, it's all good. As for fingerprints and DNA, it's about the ease of application - I'm not fingerprinted everytime I buy something, or in routine traffic stops. It's sufficently difficult to compare fingerprints that it's only done when it's meaningful.
      There may be plenty of people who have knee jerk reactions, but I'd say that a mandatory, IMPLANTED id card is about as "personal freedom" related as you can get. As I've said before - YOU can tag yourself all you want. I don't care about you. But if you want to tag ME? You better come with your guns. I am not an animal. I am not a subject. I am not a commodity. I am a citizen and the goverment exists to serve ME, not the other way around.

  113. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by Thatman311 · · Score: 0

    Guess you own't be flying. You have to show picture ID 2 or 3 times just to get on. so what if you have a ticket? who just the hell are you?

    --
    Silly Rabbit...Sig's are for kids.
  114. Uh oh by mav[LAG] · · Score: 2

    Don't ever use a Kevin Warwick story as a link unless it's this one showing how he's a complete fraud or maybe this one for a look into his thinking, or you could even use this one.

    On second thoughts, just go to The Reg and search for Captain Cyborg.

    --
    --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
  115. this was hot news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when i submitted it a week ago. Slashdot likes to wait until after everyone else has read something to post it.

  116. Cell phones & credit cards by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 1

    People'll just get this like they credit cards or cell phones I suppose. Useless if only one person has one, but opens up a whole can of goodies|worms if everyone has one. It'll be optional though and even if most people have one there will still be people doing without.

    --
    Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
  117. Prison Song by KikassAssassin · · Score: 1

    Much like the System of a Down song... "They're trying to build a prison..." Though the song uses drugs as an example, the more I read about stuff like this, the more it seems like the song's underlying message may be becoming truer and truer. Keeping tabs on everyone, knowing where you are and what you're doing at all times, taking away your personal privacy... sure sounds like a description of a prison if I ever heard one.

    Of course, there's always the people's right of liberty by opposing their government... but what happens if the government is able to brainwash the general public into siding with everything they say? It's already been pretty well proven that advertising is one thing the the US government excels at.

  118. tracking beacons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will be also used as tracking beacons

    Great... so now you can count how many people are in a building before you blow it up

  119. I read about this somewhere... by ellem · · Score: 1

    Revelatioins 13:14
    And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
    15
    And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
    16
    And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
    17
    And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
    18
    Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  120. Almost worth it by bstadil · · Score: 1

    Having the religious right figthing the FBI with weapons makes this almost worth it.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  121. Lincoln said it best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it. ....Abraham Lincoln- First Inaugural Address, Monday, March 4, 1861.

  122. I'm an atheist.. by jcr · · Score: 2

    ..but I wouldn't submit to this, either.

    Furthermore, if anyone ever insists that I do so, I hope I'll have the guts to kill the motherfucker.

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  123. Right on by applejacks · · Score: 1

    My uncle has loads of cows in the pasture. I plan on just living off them eventually. Yet, we still have to pay taxes on land. So you would still need to associate yourself with the currency of trade in the country otherwise the gov. would just take your land. Also welfare would probably be out of the question becuase they would require you to receive a device to get that. We're allready required to get community water services. I don't know why I like ground water without the clorine myself. its a Grand time to be alive :) ----- -Born in east LA i wuz born in east LA... j/k

    1. Re:Right on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ----
      [i]My uncle has loads of cows in the pasture. I plan on just living off them eventually. Yet, we still have to pay taxes on land. So you would still need to associate yourself with the currency of trade in the country otherwise the gov. would just take your land. Also welfare would probably be out of the question becuase they would require you to receive a device to get that. [/i]
      -----

      This is all assuming that the person would still be living in America.

  124. Six hundred and sixty six by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The number of the beast. It's coming.

  125. REVOLUTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the revolution begin!

    No tagging! Do not trust the government!

  126. Simple by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


    You are from Canada. This card will be international, meaning You'll get a card which states you are form canada and so on and so forth, a canadian version of this national ID card. You enter the USA, we check you out, you are from Canada, we let you in.

    Its simple, in order to get into the USA, you need a card. You can get the card from Canada before you enter which has all your information on it.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now we have an international national ID card? I guess the US just issues everyone in the world an ID card. Identifying the "Good Guys" from the "Bad Guys". Would good guys cards be green and bad guys be red? That would make things easier, you could tell from a distance who is dangerous and who is not.

  127. i want this number.... by sahala · · Score: 1

    ...31337

  128. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by arkanes · · Score: 1

    No, the people who object the this are the ones who think it's demeaning and improper for the government to assume that all it's citizens are criminals. Just as I object to modern copyright law and the DMCA because it presuposes that I will violate the law unless stopped, I object to this sort of national ID tracking and monitoring because it presuposes that I am a criminal. You can tag yourself all you want, if you're worried about being in an avalanche.

  129. No thats backwards by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


    We should all carry the card not the forigners because if we dont, what about all the illegal aliens already here? the MILLIONS of them here now?

    If all americans are required to carry the card we can capture them.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:No thats backwards by leastsquares · · Score: 1

      I think it is quite clear that, if the illegal aliens here in San Diego were deported, the local economy would pretty much collapse.

  130. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by mselmeci · · Score: 1

    What about civil disobedience?
    There are many kinds of people that the government would consider 'criminals': Those who have really done something bad (like kill a guy), and those who do not agree with them. Maybe you didn't kill a guy, but if Big Brother sees something he doesn't like, you can bet your butt that you'd be tagged as a criminal. And if the government can pass this, it will pass other laws worse than this because everybody who disagrees will be labeled as a criminal/terrorist.

  131. This ain't gonna happen in the US. by MsGeek · · Score: 1
    He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. -- Revelation 13:16-17

    OK, here's the reason why this ISN'T GONNA HAPPEN IN THE US, FOLKS.

    Institute something like this and there will be ultra-right wing Christian Militias, The Army Of God, Michigan Militia, what have you out in the streets with guns the next day.

    You think that the tragedy at the Murrah Federal Building in OKC was bad? Just you wait. If the US Guh'mint even breathes a word of interest in tagging its citizenry, there will be fighting in the streets, more bombs going off at Federal buildings nationwide...hell, I would suspect that people who wouldn't normally be inclined to such things would take up arms without a second thought in a situation like that.

    And remember...Duh!bya supposedly is an Evangelical Christian. Would he allow something that could be construed as the Mark Of The Beast to be deployed on his watch? I don't think so, folks.

    This might happen in Europe, where religious fervor is not as feverish as here. This might even happen in Canada or in Central and South America. I could definitely see the Chinese doing this to its citizenry. But not here. Not in the place where the Bible Belt is buckled. "Mark" my words: it ain't gonna happen in the USA.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:This ain't gonna happen in the US. by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Oh hell. It'll happen here, the tagging will continue wheather or not people like it. The majority of sheep will be convinced that we need to do it 'for the children' so we an track pedophiles, sexual predators, thieves, misc. criminals, mp3 traders, people that fuck apple pies, and free thinkers. All to keep them safe. It'll happen, and the American people will gladly line up to get their implants.

    2. Re:This ain't gonna happen in the US. by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      *****
      >> And remember...Duh!bya supposedly is an Evangelical Christian. Would he allow something that could be construed as the Mark Of The Beast to be deployed on his watch? I don't think so, folks.
      *****
      ...and you don't think that being a fundie christian will have any bearing as to whether or not Dubya will do it? These fundie types have been selectively interpreting the ByeBull for decades now in such a way that that nasty little book will always prove them "right". Just look at the whole thing about capital punishment vs. abortion...on one hand, life is sacred, and murder is a sin, but wait!...an eye for an eye and we gotta hang them criminals high! That's just scratching the surface!

      I wonder what people like Michael Moore, Noam Chomsky and Jello Biafra would have to say about this sort of thing. One thing is certain, with a chip planted in them, there would be increasingly fewer places where they actually could think what they were thinking!

    3. Re:This ain't gonna happen in the US. by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2
      I agree that "marking people" is not going to happen in the U.S., being that we are 90+ Christian. It wouldn't even get to the point where there was fighting on the streets about it. As long as we have elected representatives who listen to their consitituents, this will never happen.


      Of course if we were to lose our basic rights guaranteed by the Consititution, then all that goes out the window. Then there would be a reason to fight the government.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    4. Re:This ain't gonna happen in the US. by uninet · · Score: 1

      Well, according to scripture, this will happen by the hand of the Antichrist (one world government leader), who will deceive the people into thinking he is God.

      --
      -------------
      "You would not get a high grade for such a design" -- Andy Tanenbaum on Linus' Linux design.
    5. Re:This ain't gonna happen in the US. by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      "Mark" my words: it ain't gonna happen in the USA.

      Actually, to pick nits a bit - it was John (the Beloved) who wrote the book of Revelation, not Mark.

      But you're entirely right about it not happening in the USA, at least not now. I'm sure the terrorism aspect wouldn't be the main problem, though - it would be the conservatives as a whole that would object. Even if they didn't manage to convince enough people it's a bad idea either though ethical or religious argument, there would be plenty of us who would opt for disobedience of any law requiring its use.

      But back to the religious argument: there would be a mighty uproar, with at least 1/4 of the USA's citizens firmly believing that it's the mark of the beast - even if it doesn't go into your right hand or in your forehead.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    6. Re:This ain't gonna happen in the US. by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2

      I can see a lot of Jews objecting for a very different but quite real set of reasons. And I have always wondered about these national ID things. I mean what is to stop the terorists from getting a drivers licence? Or a passport (real or a good fake).

      I also have to say I was "Profiled" at Atlanta Hartsfield airport a few weeks back. They patted me down ran the wand over me (twice) and searched my bag. They even wanted to know what was under my kippa (my hair and maybe a bobby pin). Now I do look "Middle Eastern" and I was not born in the USA but they had no way of knowing that, but hell I'm a US citizen and grew up outside of Boston and in New Jersey. And I look like the Jew that I am.

      On the other hand for long distance travel the airlines are the only game in town.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    7. Re:This ain't gonna happen in the US. by crtreece · · Score: 1
      Our government listens to the people? hahahaha

      You mean the one that murdered the men, women and children at Waco and Ruby Ridge? Or the one that shot down twa flight 800 and covered it up? Or maybe the one that still arrests people for marijuana possesion in states that have decriminalized/legalized it for medical use? Umm, maybe you mean the one that invented the "incident" in the Gulf of Tonkin to drag us into the vietnam war? Or the one that let the FBI infiltrate protest groups in the '60s, subverting their rights to free speach? Wait, you mean the government that setup this phony war in Afghanistan, so we can build an oil pipline?

      You talk about the loss of rights under the constitution. You must not have read the PATRIOT act, which schreds what little there was left of the bill of rights. With its passage you lose the right to trial by jury, the right to be free from illegal searches and seisures, the right to confront your accusor in court, and the right to criticize the government.

      Heres an idea for you, turn off MSNBC/CNN/Fox News and look at some news sources that aren't run by and for the government propaganda machine.

      Personally, I hope to be ready when the rest of America wakes up and decides its time to throw off the chains we've put ourselves in.

      --
      file: .signature not found
  132. Re:Hahahaha!! by LWolenczak · · Score: 1

    my understanding is that its manditory, even if it is not though, is not as if you can get through grade school without filling out your SSN on a test or something like that. I remember my 6th grade year soo many years ago, and we had to put our SSN on tests, ofcorse, this was before congress decided that the SSN could be used as ID.

  133. Re:Hahahaha!! by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > Unless this chip is implanted deep in he body at birth they will be removed, shorted, hacked in a matter of days...

    Well, if we used tamperproof hardware that ejected a burst of cyanide when a security breach was attempted, I can bet you there'd be a shortage of volunteers ;-)

    (And think of how this could be used for crime control - how 'bout a small packet of sedatives, which, upon receipt of an authorizing signal, dropped the suspect to the ground.)

    Think about what you could do with public-key cryptography. Build chip-guns that get their authorization by combining the gun's public key, the government's private key, and the law enforcement officer's public key. Only the cop can shoot the gun, and (if the gun transmits the user's private key, downloadable with a warrant) only the target gets hit.

    Imagine a gun that shoots to sedate, not kill, and where it's impossible for the cop, no matter how incompetent a shot he is, to hit an innocent bystander.

    (Hell, scale it up. Issue the warrant and use transmitters mounted on every cell phone tower in the county to drop the perp. No cops required!)

  134. NT.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess who the next NT convert is - YOU.

  135. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > the Nazis developed a Total State based on suspicion of citizens, preusumption of guilt, and a vast network of internal spies.

    I was thinking more of East Germany's Stasi and the former USSR.

    The reason it didn't work is because it took too much effort (and too much resources) to keep track of everyone - when half the population is part of the secret police, and the other half is watching out for them, nobody has time to get anything done.

    By reducing the effort required to perform surveillance, we actually have the possibility of getting the security of the surveillance state, but without the collapse in efficiency that usually goes along with it.

    All in all, that just might work.

  136. I like tattoos better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rather than an implanted chip, I believe a simple number tattooed on the arm would be a more cost effective solution for population control. It is a proven technology, having been used in Central Europe in the 20th century with great effectiveness. There are, in fact, some people still alive with these tattoos who can testify as to their effectiveness.

  137. Prepare for inevitable by N3P1u5U17r4 · · Score: 1

    YES, it will happen... not yet but some day in the not too distant future we will all be tagged and basic services denied to those who are not tagged.

    Maybe we should all start planning for this already. We need to start creating communities that can exist independently of the rest of society... own power supply, water purification systems, waste management systems and farming. Time to start up a commune I guess.

    --
    You're Just Jealous Because The Voices Are Talking To Me.
    1. Re:Prepare for inevitable by statusbar · · Score: 2

      But those societies will be seen as harbouring terrorists and will be quickly shut down.

      --jeff

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
  138. Revelation: prophecy or historical allegory? by MsGeek · · Score: 1
    Actually in the time of the writing of the Book of Revelation, when a man was inducted into the Roman Legions, he was branded with a regimental mark on his right hand and forehead.

    In the mysteries of Mithras, those who were of a certain degree in the mysteries were also given a new mark on both places...the mark of Mithras.

    There are tons of similarities between elements of both the old and new testaments and the legends of Mithras.

    • Born on December 25th, his birth witnessed by shepherds.
    • His mother was either a virgin girl or the Petra Genetrix, a stone which broke open to reveal the newborn Mithras.
    • A new star appeared in the Heavens on Mithras' birth.
    • Three priests of the Zoroastrian faith, called Magi, traveled to meet him soon after and give him royal gifts.
    • When Mithras came of age he saved his people from a drought by striking a rock and bringing forth water from it.
    • When Ahriman, the enemy of Mithras' father, the supreme Zoroastrian deity Ahura Mazda, caused a world-wide flood, Mithras again saved his people by fashioning a miraculous boat, where he gathered animals and righteous humans in to sail the waters unmolested.
    • Finally Ahriman incarnated himself as a massive bull, which tore through the world destroying everything in its path. Mithras went forth to slay the bull. At the point when Mithras drove his dagger into the bull to strike the fatal blow, the bull fatally gored the god-man. The mingled blood of bull and godling cleansed the Earth. This cleansing was reenacted in the Mithraeum as the Taurobolium, the cleansing baptism of initiates in the blood of a sacrificed bull.
    • Three days after the fight which killed him, Mithras rose from the dead. He gathered 12 men with him where he taught them the mysteries of his new religion, the central one being the Mizd, a sacred meal shared amongst initiates. The Roman worshippers of Mithras called the meal Missa. In the Mithraeum, the one who would officiate at this sacred meal was known as the Pontifex Maximus, the Great Bridge-builder, for it is said the act of the Missa bridged the gap between the divine Mithras and his human worshippers.
    • Finally Mithras ascended into Heaven to sit at the right hand of Ahura Mazda until the time came for the last great battle between Good and Evil.

    If you don't believe me, Google for "Mithras" or "Mithraeum."

    Much of the writings of the Early Church Fathers were condemnation of Mithraism, a competitor to Christianity.

    Many scholars now believe the Book of Revelation was less about a future time and place than about the persecution of Christians under people like the Emperor Nero. When you see it as an allegory of history instead of prophecy, it actually makes more sense. Basically it was a message to those suffering persecution under Imperial Rome. "Hang in there."

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  139. Re:Hahahaha!! by SuzanneA · · Score: 1
    (Hell, scale it up. Issue the warrant and use transmitters mounted on every cell phone tower in the county to drop the perp. No cops required!)

    Wouldn't work. What happens if/when a perp is driving at 80 on the freeway when it happens? You now have say 30-40 innocent people killed in a pile-up that was caused by the police's 'safe' arrest system. Can you say 'PR nightmare' ?

    As for cyanide and other nonsense, again, it wouldn't work. It would only take 2-3 cases where the dosage is accidently released (stand too close to a microwave) and you have another PR nighmare.

    Of course, they haven't thought this thru too well as it stands... You pretty much have a guarenteed non-vote by probably all jewish people, and most people old enough to remember/care about the 'ID stamping' that hitler did. Just about every politician fears the eldery's vote as it is.

  140. This is too far. by 1101 · · Score: 1

    They can implant my cold, dead body.

    1. Re:This is too far. by Dave+Bieler · · Score: 0

      I agree 100%. Most of the readers on /. are liberal humanists who would not understand something like this. But it should be obvious to any enlightened person that we are nearing the end times...and this is just another sign.

  141. Re:Hahahaha!! by D+Anderson+n'Swaart · · Score: 2
    You would also think that parents would not teach as truth to their children that which they only believe to be true, without giving them a chance to grow up and decide whether they think that Christianity/Judaism/Islam/religion-of-choice/beli ef-of-choice makes sense to them or not. I know this is probably a less permanent thing than a chip in your kid (although a lot of kids get so ingrained into the religion they're taught that they never question it), but it's essentially the same thing.

    Parents do what they believe is best for their children and for the family. It's hard to fault them for that, even when you think they're totally wrong and completely detached from reality.

  142. this is bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mon was really religious and stuff and would always talk about "the end times" Im sure you have all heard one version or another BUT she said that near the end times, all people would be marked, either in the right hand or the head under the skin......too weird for me.

  143. I wonder... by Stalcair · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I wonder what the Jews in Germany circa 1925 would have said about this... then take another poll every 5 years and compare the results. Regardless of any planned conspiracy to wipe anyone out, the facts as history teaches them simply say that things like this end up being very bad, whether through inefficiency, incompetence, negligence or malevolence. It is amazing that on one hand how the science fiction themes from the past are creeping up on us, but what I think is even more amazing is how you have two sides that argue on the technology, while overlooking the fact that the technology is simply a tool of a consistently proven bad idea. No, the sides aren't always the two major parties, but they often play the sides to gather the votes.

    Actually, the trully sad and pathetic part is not that the elite would wish this, it is their nature and wise men should come to expect that by now, no rather it is the fact that in cases like this the 'fors' and 'againsts' will primarily be made up of willfully ignorant parrots that spew forth rhetoric without FULLY taking the time to comprehend the nature of the issue. I encourage everyone to fight this like you should fight any battle, with honor and courage. Don't stoop to the level of the bureaucrats and politicians by selectively choosing only those facts that will support your side, rather approach everything more like a third (unbiased) party with a more scientific method. Let the facts lead those that are logical and ethical on their own merit, do not deceive and conceive 'facts'.

    Okay, that sounds preachy but I am really tired now, so forgive me please.

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

  144. I like your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think another good one is "you are SO independent and individual, just like ALL those other independent and individual non-conformists"

  145. Future-generation chips. by Proteus+Child · · Score: 1
    I don't like the direction this is going in.

    First people get used to putting chips with identifying codes under their skin.. then future revisions of said chips including tracking circuitry. Call me crazy, but I don't like the idea of someone being able to track me down by issuing a signal from a transmitter.

    I don't mind the idea of implanted computing technology, I really don't... but said hardware runs tasks for me, like keeping track of e-mail addresses or subvocalised notes for me, and doesn't act as a mere storage repository. It's my meat.. it's my hardware.. I control what it does, not whomever implants it.

    --

    Proteus' Child

    Doko ni datte; hito wa, tsunagette iru.

  146. One small comment. by AgTiger · · Score: 1

    At the risk of making a redundant post, I'd like to make one small comment:

    > Such radio-activated chips are already used to track cattle...

    I think that pretty much says it all, right there.

  147. Ya know, there will always be crime. by thedbp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is always be death. There will always be criminals. There will always be those who disagree with the powers that be. There were always be terrorists. There will always be discomfort. There will always be backaches. There will always be stiff, aching joints. There will always be home-made bombs. There will always be thugs. There will always be police brutality. There will always be corrupt governments. There will always be secret socities of Masons and the Illuminatis running the world under the guise of democracy. There will always be disobedience. There will always be hijackers. There will always be unpleasantness.

    Trying to control chaos is futile. For every measure of security, there will be a new kind of crack. For every length of dictatorship and oppression, there will be a spark of dissent. It comes and goes in waves. Right now, the US occupies the same slot that we rebelled against England for having over 200 years ago. Now look at England: socialized medicine, a happy, respectful populace ... it took England getting bitchslapped the world over and its empire stripped from it for it to become what is now a model free society. The royal family are relics of what once was ... and as soon as those inbred twits die off, the better.

    The same will happen to the US. National ID cards, even subcutaneous implants will not stop the rising tide of Hungry Freaks. It is pointless, expensive, and thoroughly unwarranted and authoritarian.

    But, much like Christians scare people with the idea of Hell into becoming raving lunatics (merry f-ing xmas, you stupid cultists), the US has whipped up the populace into a fit of nationalism with the threat of TERRORISTS! (i'm shaking!). Now we'll take any sort of rights-revoking freedom-raping with a big, sloppy, give-it-to-me grin.

    Sad.

    1. Re:Ya know, there will always be crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now look at England: socialized medicine, a happy, respectful populace ... it took England getting bitchslapped the world over and its empire stripped from it for it to become what is now a model free society"

      Model free society?!?!?
      last time i checked you had cameras on every corner,armed jackboots,a disarmed populace that aren't allowed to defend themselves,horrible taxes to support all this..AND these chips are supposedly going to get STARTED over there...

      "respectful populace"
      Damn straight you better be respectful...or you're shot...
      fuckn eurotrash...

  148. ... As someone whose identity was stolen.... by simetra · · Score: 1

    To all you whiny ass, knee-jerk personal-freedom crybabies... take this into consideration.
    My passport and birth certificate were stolen, likely by a useless piece of crap crack-head who should be put to death on general principles. Until you have put up with the hassle of trying to straighten out your life and clear your name after your identity was hijacked and used to commit crimes, please, please, please, just go back to whacking off to anime and try think that maybe, just maybe, these Big Brother/Hitler paranoid delusions have very little basis in reality.
    Thanks. Really, I mean that.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:... As someone whose identity was stolen.... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      When it's happened before, it does not have very little basis in reality. In fact, it has quite a lot of basis in reality.

      Those who do not know their history are doomed to repeat it.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    2. Re:... As someone whose identity was stolen.... by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 1

      I imagine that they had to commit crimes with your identity because it wasn't good for much else.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    3. Re:... As someone whose identity was stolen.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not getting tagged like wildlife because you lost your ID.

  149. So it begins by ChozSun · · Score: 1

    It's funny that many articles concerning digital identification always mention September 11th but no one takes the moment to link digital id's and September 11th.

    How convenient that a terrorist attacked happened and not several months later, we already have microchips ready to be implanted. Who is the company behind the chips... really? Who is behind the terrorist attacks... really?

    People, especially Christians read the Left Behind (http://www.leftbehind.com/) and let they are willing to do whatever it takes to prevent these sort of "terrorist" attacks again.

    People, especially those who call themselves enlightened, totally get what "The Matrix" was all about but fail to emphasize the most important line in the movie from the character, Morpheus: not everyone wants to be awakened.

    So convenient indeed.

    --
    ChozSun
    ChozSun.com
  150. Not going to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will never allow such a device inside me. Period. Hell. Who's to say that we already don't have some sort of identifiable device inside us, implanted during shortly after childbirth..?

  151. Perhaps Larry Ellison (may he burn in hell) will by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

    buy this company and offer the technology to the government for free.

  152. The funny thing is ... by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    That drugs and prostitution are leagal some countries.
    Here in Oz donating trips to the local leagal brothel is tax-deductible, and the workers are eligable for workers comp if they get hurt on the job :-)

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  153. ha-ha, only serious by Etrigan_696 · · Score: 1

    I can imagine my grandpa, sitting on his back porch, eating a salted turnip, with a copy of the bible in his lap when I tell him about this article. He'll say something like:
    "Hmmm...sound's like the Mark of the Beast to me."
    And then he'll open the bible to revelations and start reading...
    Not being quite the religious man my grandfather is, all I have to say about this technology is:
    Why do we need this? How will this improve the quality of life for humanity at large?

  154. Ways to screw this up: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's put on our thinking caps boys and girls, how could you screw up the chip? Let me stoke the flames of thought:

    1) Xacto-knife, remove chip, stomp... Butterfly bandage...

    2) Magnet... BIG MAGNET. MRI?

    3) RF xmitter on the same freq as the chips?

    4) RF "trigger" on the read freq as the chips - trigger everyone's chip...

    5) Counterfeit chips? Programmed with the ID # of say, JQ Public?

    6) RF device - listens for the scan for your ID, returns spoofed info...

  155. Even better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Shouldnt that read Dark Angel instead of Digital Angel???

    I prefer the term Digital Demon.

  156. Sheep (us) will all accept it without question by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    I remember having a...discussion..with a colleague about this sort of thing back in the early '90's, and his response essentially boiled down to"I have nothing to hide, so what's the problem?". I felt like asking him if he enjoyed being guilty until proven innocent. This nasty little device, ultimately, will probably be able to be tracked whenever and wherever you are, as soon as it', under your skin. It doesn't matter if you're "guilty" of anything or not, the PTB will be following you, like it or not! My colleagues response was something to the effect of the fact that the PTB can already track you based on your credit and bank cards, so why is this any different. I'm not at all impressed that I'm being tracked according to whatever financial transactions I make on either card, but fact is, I can leave said credit/debit cards safe at home if I like, and nobody really has to know where I'm going or what I'm doing if I decide to pay cash for it. As far as I'm concerned, having one of these things implanted into me would be akin to having a Nazi serial number tattooed onto my arm in a concentration camp, and, if they really mean these things to work, it had better be buried somewhat deeper than just my skin, 'cause I'll have it gouged out in an hour! Even if it was just the government I had to worry about, it's still too much, but if they would (will) allow whatever bunch of marketing subhumans to have at the data, in hopes of being able to sell me even more beer and cookies...you can see whewre this is going.

    IMHO, Jefferson or Franklin of whoever the hell it was who said something to the effect that people who trade liberty for security deserve neither is RIGHT!

  157. Europe and South America??? by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

    wtf? The U.S. is falling even more behind in getting new technology. Japan and Europe being ahead of us, I can understand. They've been ahead of us in cell phones for years. But South America? When did they jump ahead of us technologically?

    Cryptnotic

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  158. Re:maybe the U.S. military has already prototyped. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL, this ain't the the mid 1900's buddy and troops are just as sceptical as you are. Actually, many of them are *more* concerned about government actions than you are because they experience government underhandedness on a daily basis.

  159. no man might buy or sell by NumberSyx · · Score: 2

    Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

    Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

    Good thing I have some karma to burn.

    --

    "Our products just aren't engineered for security,"
    -Brian Valentine,VP in charge of MS Windows Development

  160. What about.... by hilltop · · Score: 0
    Its all fun and games until someone cuts me open to steal my identity

    and if cash transactions are done through this chip, someone will slice me open to steal my money instead of just mugging me. This ID chip thing sure sounds like a great plan.

    hilltop

  161. public acceptance over time by 1001+0000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This won't happen over night. I see other posters vehemently claiming they would "rather die" than have a mandatory implant. I guarantee you, it wont be YOU who will be forced to have in implant - you have grown up knowing that a forced implant is undemocratic, satanic, etc. To your children, however, the idea will not seem so extreme. To your children's children it will be nothing at all...

    I imagine this taking a couple generations.

    1st step: As in now: optional implants for company workers. Today, some higher up execs traveling in 3rd world countries, where ransoming is prevalent, implant homing devices in their bodies.

    2nd step: Forcible use of implants on violent criminals. This will be met with little resistance, as it is accepted that criminals forfeit some rights by committing crimes. I say "violent criminals" (i.e. rapists, murderers) as they would garner the least public sympathy. Soon after, lesser criminals would be tagged - eventually anyone who commits a criminal act. I imagine this process as taking a decade or so.

    3rd step: Certain perks for those who accept an implant; faster border crossing, airport check in, etc. Those who refuse "optional" implants face longer delays (and other intentional hurdles). For you religious people, maybe a credit system whereby one just walks out of the store with merchandise -- only the luddites can be seen waiting in line. Over the space of years, people come to suspect those that refuse implants as having something to hide.

    4th step: A new government policy -- all babies tagged at birth. My guess is that by this point (say 80 years from today), most people elect to have implants and the government need not force any legislation (that's why I say policy not law).

    Never will an adult citizen be forced to have a foreign object implanted in their body. There will never be any protesting on the street or wild outrage. If this does happen, it will be slowly and insidiously.

    Its always the gradual change that slips under the radar.

    1. Re:public acceptance over time by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      To your children, however, the idea will not seem so extreme. To your children's children it will be nothing at all...

      That's what religion is for. For example, through the generations, actively religious families have generally been able to keep hold of the idea that sexual intercourse before marriage is wrong. It's difficult to do, admittedly, but the whole faith thing makes it much easier once your kids get the hang of it...

      My point? Religion helps keep a constant set of values. As far as I know, it's the best tool for that job.

      Fortunately, we wouldn't have to wedge anything in to the religion that seems to dominate so-called "Western" culture. It's in the book of Revelation already as the "mark of the beast."

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  162. Human right missing by benb · · Score: 1

    I am missing a human right in the declaration of the UN:

    The inviolableness of the body.

  163. Is it really a Big deal? by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

    I see how nasty this can sound, but ask yourself, " How will I get around this tech?". Simple, somebody else will make it. Back in the old days of Atari, Colecio made a atari-like console from reverse engineering. Circumvention tech has ALWAYS been around, even if it's in the black market. Who hasn't seen a spidery black box hanging from behind a cable box? Just a few Years ago, PSX was hit with that nice thing called a Mod Chip. All it is is just a Pic processor with programmed instructions. I even "burnt" mine (eeprom burner). However if this ever does become mandatory, I'll be using the buffer overrun type chip that crashes computer-readers, or I'll just emp the sucker. I'm sure that it will be using cmos gates (the only way for devices to be fried with emp).

    Josh Crawley

    1. Re:Is it really a Big deal? by HawaiiPiglet · · Score: 1

      It's a frightening time when cyber soldiers figure a way around a civil impingement rather than build an insurmountable way to foil its implementation. But I understand and am beginning to feel something similar. No government entity is seeing long range. More and more intrusion in life is extending from our government's pseudopods. The bad name that bad government gives to "politics" may be to blame because, without politics, you certainly will never change -- or corral -- bad government.

      --
      Those who would surrender freedom for security soon have neither.
  164. Big Brother = AS/6666666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could all get inplanted to incress efecentcy. ie no ID/tax/pay check/medicar/tangable tender. It could all be done automaticly by computer. Then it prevent abuse we creat the computer to run autonomis(No humen interaction) because computers are perfect. Seams like a good idea to me :-).

    I wont overlord I wont OverLoad now damit and a vest controled by the computer that allows me to live forever(- radioactive decay). Or copy my brain to a computer and use it to collonize the stars.(Hi Mister Fireball)

    Anyone who has read some of Orson Scott Card's books will know what I am takiing about. I hope I got his name right.

  165. Of course the sheeple will accept this by jhylkema · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's see here, we've already accepted:

    -- Our private medical information being entered into databases and sold to marketing companies.

    -- Our credit records, containing all sorts of personal and private data, being sold to marketing companies and being used to barrage us with all manner of advertisements for crap we don't need or want.

    -- The Brits have accepted their every movement being monitored by closed-circuit telescreens, er, cameras, in the name of "crime prevention."

    -- A de facto National ID number (the Social Insecurity number).

    -- DoubleClick teaming up with Polk to personally identify and track web usage of individuals.

    -- The Clipper chip. Key escrow. Carnivore. Nuff said.

    What's to stop us from accepting a microship implant? "Oh, you don't want this? What are you a terrorist? A pedophile? A criminal?" is the most common refrain. Or, "If you're an honest guy, you've got nothing to worry about." And you know what? It works every time, it'll work this time too. Face it, folks, it's coming and we've done it to ourselves. We have finally gotten the government we deserve.

    Oh well, call me a cynic, but I'm only surprised that it has taken this long.

    1. Re:Of course the sheeple will accept this by Kirruth · · Score: 1
      Different countries strike different balances in how they manage the privacy issue. So, although in Britain, closed circuit television is indeed widely used, nobody minds much because car crime, civil disorder and terrorist attacks worry the people there. So, the measure matches the threat.

      It's not clear to me what threats an identity chip would reduce. Conversely, its impact on liberty would be very great. The ability to go about your business unobserved and unmolested is not part of freedom - it is freedom.

      The answer to "why don't you want this" is to say, its precisely because I am not a terrorist, a pedophile or a criminal, that I have the right to freedom and the will and the means to fight for it.

      --
      "Well, put a stake in my heart and drag me into sunlight."
  166. A suggestion for ID implantation. by Xilman · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's a great idea! They should be implanted in everyone's buttocks.


    Then we'd all be smart-arses.


    Paul

    --
    Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate
  167. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by pathwayX · · Score: 1

    Nobody would mind indeed, if governments around the world were ideal. If there was no corruption, no greater interests, etc etc ad nauseum.

    Are they? Uh. No. Hell no. When you think about a technology, and when you are weighing its benefits, you shouldn't think of how it can be used. You should think of how it would be ABused. Because it will be.

    --
    So long, and thanks for all the fish
  168. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by pathwayX · · Score: 1

    Thanks for reminding me. While I cannot confirm whether this is a rumor/horror story/urban myth or the truth, I've heard that in the days when East Germany was a totalitarian state, several 'political suspects' were tagged using radioactive material by the secret police.

    With the unfortunate side-effect that many of them died of cancer and other pleasant things.

    "But no, really. These implants are safe! Scout's honor." ...Bugger off.

    --
    So long, and thanks for all the fish
  169. Another poorly considered idea by Twylite · · Score: 2

    So this implant is intended for medical use, and subsequently identification? What does it offer that a bracelet with a MedAlert number or (to get high-tech) a smart card (on the bracelet) doesn't (in terms of medical detail)?

    How does this assist in identification? The object of accurate identification is NOT to track ordinary people (except in aggregate), but to track specific people. Those who currently go to great lengths to avoid being identified, bypassing existing security and forging their credentials.

    And, as usual, the Great Propaganda Machine assumes that because Joe Public can't remove an implant or modify it somehow, neither can a well funded terrorist.

    Most disturbing, however, is the list of exceptions that will arise. Anyone who any government determines should be incognito will be able to get "fake" implants or avoid implants altogether. You don't want even a short range transmitter giving away the location of your crack troops, do you?

    --
    i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
  170. Re:Have you hacked into the FBI or the US governme by uspsguy · · Score: 1

    You are conviently overlooking the fact that there will have to be millions on millions of cheap, reliable scanners absoutely everywhere that can read and verify such a card - even the thought of security by obscurity is a joke in the real world application of such a system. I'm sure the terrorists would love such a system. People will come to rely on it with unswerving devotion and someone with a cracked card will be almost invisible despite activities that would raise suspicions under other circumstances

    --
    Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
  171. Re:It won't be long before they are mandatory for by Wolfger · · Score: 1

    Following that prediction, I'll have to say that the next revolutionary war isn't far off, either.

  172. Trading freedom for an illusion by curious.corn · · Score: 1

    This morning I took the subway here in Rome and on the billboards usually covered by lightly dressed models (some Santas are sooo cute in Hot Pants ;-) ) I saw a Patrol publicity. Yep, us italians hysterize quite easily so some egghead must have thought: "Let's put a private guard in every sub station!" The big, bad, marine style beef prettily dressed up in a somewhat fascist uniform + basque, smiling at best as a pissed off rottweiler. Of course none of these idiots could do anything if some loon decides to have afternoon tea with his god but the idea is that this should and does, clear the panic from the avg citizen.

    So it dawned on me that most of the people are so bloody scared of what's around them that they are willing to give up whatever they have just to _feel_ safe. So many behaviours and recent political chioces are plainly driven by fear... we are just crying for Daddy! So here he comes, he'll take care of everything, he'll defend us from the bad guys, he'll make us prosper... all we have to do is keep quiet when he's hard at work and do as we're told, no discussions.

    This subcutaneous chip is not just the Si-era (probaby bluetooth) version of the nazi serial tattoo... you see, those dicks, and us italians too, had a fundamentally aggressive ideology. All we have here is the middle class rat attitude at it's greatest... the proudly ignorant haunted by the 'Hic sunt dragones' that lie beyond his fog-of-war. Our problem is just the immense ignorance our society is breeding: Haider, Berlusconi, Bossi, Patrols, [favreligion] fundamentalism, uright conservatism. Where has the 'Global Village' of the 80's gone... washed away with the yuppies?

    Merry XMas,
    Eddy

    --
    Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
  173. Heil Satan! by santeri · · Score: 1

    Ji-haa! Finally they're doing something worthy with that technology. I just hope they include a remote implentee termination option on the chip as well... I mean syanide or such for efficient population control.

    --
    ______________
    OTTERS RULE.
  174. Sounds like a good plan by santeri · · Score: 1
    ...so count one for Satan here.

    But seriously, this discussion was about interesting technology, not fairy tales, so you're really off-topic now.

    --
    ______________
    OTTERS RULE.
  175. Re:The Worst Part About Demolition Man... by OD2000 · · Score: 1

    And they played commercials on the radio.. bummer

  176. no way in hell by austad · · Score: 2

    The first person who tries to implant one of these in me is going to have a bullet implanted in them.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  177. Take the chips and shove them up their ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    There is no way in hell I am tagging myself or any members of my family. Furthermore, I think the whole computer thing is just making a majority of the general public, to quote George Carlin, REALLY FUCKING STUPID! No one thinks for himself or herself anymore; and Kids don't use their imaginations anymore - all these idiots do is rely on the computer. I purchased a $1.50 item in a store the other day with a $5 dollar bill and the brain trust behind the register had to ask what the change is this purchase - all the while I am saying to him $3.50, $3.50,v but does he listen to me? NO - he asks the other moron and she tells him $4.75! And then says just use the register! So you want to put a chip in me for "Medical Reasons". It will be faster if you're ever in a medical situation. No fucking way can we let these people who cannot think trust a computer to give them the 100 percent answer. They just might listen to the computer and not common sense and treat you for something that isn't wrong with you.... KEEP THE CHIPS IN THE ANIMALS (This included all the fucking criminals out there) POWER TO THE PEOPLE - NO ONE ELSE!

  178. 666 Technology by Shuh · · Score: 1

    Now the only question remain is: "Head or hand?"

  179. Privacy is a right, so dumb people deserve it too by bindster · · Score: 1

    To all you who would suggest that those who are not criminals have nothing to hide and should welcome the conveniences that this implant could offer: may I recommend that you arrange with your local police department to have your body cavities regularly checked, to prove that you are not hiding anything illegal in them, since you obviously care more about the government's right to know at anytime what you have and what you are doing than about your own right to privacy.

    --
    WARNING: DO NOT LET DR. MARIO TOUCH YOUR GENITALS. HE IS NOT A REAL DOCTOR.
  180. So? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    More jobs for us americans. Who cares about the so called local economy if its not even us who are working there?

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  181. The government has their own software by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    Currently you do fly on airliners with government software. The space shuttle can be hyjacked because it has software on it too.

    Forgers would have to pay millions of dollars to forge just a few cards, it wouldnt be like it is now where anyone can take your identity.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  182. Security for your family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you, but in my country (Mexico) and mostly in Latinamerica, kidnapping is a very popular form of getting easy money, because about 96% of the time the perpretators never get caught. And lately the victims are being found dead.
    That's why I think we have to have one personal tracking ID. Maybe not a enforced one, but an optional one, that way, kidnapping would be a lot more difficult.
    I want to feel safe myself and to feel safe about my kids an my wife.

    Just my $ 0.02

    1. Re:Security for your family by mselmeci · · Score: 1

      You've got a point. Hey, how about this: if you travel to a country where there is a high possibility of kidnapping, then they implant a temporary microchip, one that can be deactivated when you get back to the states, and possibly reactivated if you need it again.

  183. The Transparent Society By David Brin by JBoelke · · Score: 1

    David Brin the Science Fiction writer who wrote the UpLift series wrote this non-fiction book on how society can chose to handle the lack of privacy advancing technology can bring. Facial tracking software on every camera. Every ATM, gas station, subway, supermarket, and the list goes on in one seamless net. Think of all the criminals it could catch. But who would have access? Police Central Headquaters: Mother do I trust the government? Instant access all the time on the Web. Psycho-stalker's delight! I wonder if my crazed ex-girl friend is still checking up on me? This ablity to track people is comming soon. Very soon. The question is how do we as a society respond? My high school students came up with this solution. After 48 hours everything is aviable on the web. If a crime, or something horror movie like occures a judge could rule that block from the voyeristic public view. The key point being the judge must rule something out. Just a thought.

  184. 666 stood for the roman emperor Dioclecian. by leereyno · · Score: 2

    666 was a code for the initials of the emperor Dioclecian(sp?). If A=1, B=2, C=3.... then in the alphabet they were using 666 would equal his initials. In greek translations the number was 686 due to changes in the positions of the relevant letters. Needless to say this has nothing to do Satan, Lucifer, Mephisocles, etc....

    The thing to realize about Revelation is that it was meant for the time in which it was written, not our time. Lamebrains and con men have been screaming "the sky is falling, the end times are nigh!!" and using revelation as the basis for almost 2000 years.

    That being said I do think the idea of a tracking device that isn't something you can remove is a VERY bad idea. People have forgotten the concept of personal sovereignty and have fallen into the mindset that whatever rights or freedoms they posess are indulgences on the part of the government. If you believe that way then it becomes true. If however, you realize that no one has the right to hold power over you that you do not agree to, then the nature of things like this becomes very clear.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:666 stood for the roman emperor Dioclecian. by Micah · · Score: 2

      > The thing to realize about Revelation is that it was meant for the time in which it was written, not our time.

      Well I wholeheartedly disagree with that. It was meant to ENCOURAGE the persecuted people in the time it was written, and it DID have specific messages for some of the churches (Rev 2 and 3).

      However, the book was a DIVINE revelation of things that will happen at the end of the world. The encouragement is that we win!

      Of course, you have to believe in God to believe that divine revelations are possible. But personally I've experienced at least one and heard of several others, and I've seen God do a lot of other really cool things, so I have no trouble at all believing that Revelation is exactly what it claims to be.

    2. Re:666 stood for the roman emperor Dioclecian. by leereyno · · Score: 2

      While I believe in God, I'm not foolish enough to believe myself wise enough to know who or what God is, or what he want from/with us, if anything. On the other hand I have a hard time believing that anyone else does either, seeing as how each culture's interpretation of the nature of God is a relfection of the culture itself, not the nature of God. The mythologies and dogmas that each religion brings to the table are to a large degree codified superstition. That is not to say that there is not truth to be found in many of them, only that you've got to study each with a critical eye and be ready and willing to disregard things that aren't true.

      Lee

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  185. Who Me? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    But i already know who I am, why would i ever buy one of those ID chips?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  186. you IDIOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There IS no free society with stuff like this! Next time think things out!

    BTW: The black market is my favorite market.

  187. I wonder by sigxcpu · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long it takes befor somone invents a cruise missle to home in on one of thoes things.

    (That would make them vary popular...)

    --
    As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
  188. Another great book... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another great book about Bible prophecy that you may want to take a look at... The Pre-Wrath Rapture of the Church by Marv Rosenthal. It's a great read.

  189. Re:No one would accept this Boo Hoo WAAAA!!!! by Pstrobus · · Score: 1

    well, the Stasi employed one quarter of the population to do their work so they certainly had a high overhead. At the same time, their effort was wasted because they couldn't interpret the data. If we have a national tracking system, we'll end up with the same damned problem. "We know where all 250million US Citizens are, but how do we find the terrorists/criminals/bad guys of the week?"

    And again, do we want that kind of privacy invasion? If we start handing out speeding tickets based on GPS signals and toll readers, what $MajorAbuse will we get if that kind of data gathering goes into effect. Fankly, it's none of $GovernmentAgency's business that I went to the bathroom five times yesterday or that I attend church regularly (or not).

    If you make people criminals, they will live down to your expectations.

    Lastly, let's stop calling terrorists "criminals" and accept them for what they are, highly dedicated soldiers engaged in a war. That some members of a task group are killed to acheive an objective is simply a matter of military calculation, not insanity. We won't do this because this would require us to treat the acts as rational which calls into question a whole host of things we do.

    --
    "The conduct of neither [party], if strictly examined, will be irreproachable." -Elizabeth Bennet
  190. Hell, I wont piss in a cup for anybody... by lowell · · Score: 1

    what makes anyone think that I will let them implant me with a fucking chip. For the love of god, wtf has just happened. Why isnt this on the front page of every paper and main story on the news. This should have everyone pissed off big time.

  191. Blue scream of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It won't quietly fail and not give the reader information. It will crash in a way that results in a Blue Scream of Death of the person it was implanted into.

    Naturally, your survivors won't have the right to sue MS for negligence resulting in death because of the EULA.

  192. Bogus Self-Promoting Hype by billstewart · · Score: 2
    They've been hyping this for a couple of years. Doesn't mean they've actually got the technology to do it, just the technology to hype it. There's a wide range of possible motivations they could have, including
    • They're serious.... Least likly possibility :-)
    • They know that newspapers will bite, because it's good-sounding hype.
    • They're pro-surveillance types, seeing how many people will bite and what parts sound most sellable.
    • They're actually against this stuff, and think publicizing it will spook people.
    • It's a good media hack even if they're not serious. If enough people get really annoyed, it gets repeated a lot :-)
    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  193. a 6100? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    Care to give any hints about how you got LPPC on a 6100? I tried 2kQ4 on a 7100 but failed miserably. I'm now trying YDL 2.1.

  194. try this by HongPong · · Score: 1

    That was more than a year ago, o how the time has passed... try http://nubus-pmac.sourceforge.net for special kernels, info and such

  195. Medical Implications by cronik · · Score: 1

    Unless these are made out of some novel new material (ie non magnetic and can't cary a curent) you could never have an MRI (at least not a quick one {faster scan=stronger magnet}), hope you dont have a back injury or get into a bad car crash.

    I wonder how long it would be before a suit was filed for injuries from an MRI performed on a person that this was forced upon. Ex-con gets in car wreck, MRI while he/she is out, chip comes flying out of arm and through (insert soft body part here).

    Please forgive any gram./spelling errs it's 4am

    --
    Information wants to be free like speech wants to be free, not like we want beer to be free.
  196. First It's Just ID... But Then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone just needs a good-ol' non-natural microchip in their brain. How about a nice V-Chip? Don't want you thinking 'dangerous thoughts' because we all know it's dangerous to think different. Thinking about violence? Aw, that's just unethical, better not let you think anything you want no matter how perverse, or how different it is from the norm.

    I forget the title, but there was some short sci-fi story where everyone was made equal, by having chips in their brains and were then... basically dumbed down to mental retardation and had no long term memory span. This isn't an issue about privacy, it's an issue about human freedom.

    Sure, first it's just a convenience... but then it's going to get more complex and then you'll be in the hole too deep to get out. Better 'nip it in the bud' sort of speak.

    Every human being should be disgusted by such technology. Sure, it's neat, sure it's a breakthrough. But does all that comes along necessary? No.

  197. Geneva by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, this. It directly contravenes the Geneva agreement :) But appart from this, it's all in how the tech will be used. For example, I have no objection to a universal DNA database, with the catch that it could only be used for solving crimes, and would be off-limits to (for example) insurance agencies and employers (of any kind). As for the not-so-smart who talk about satelite tracking on these things...thats cost-prohibitive if used for everyone. And truth to tell, I wouldn't mind if they did that only to convicted criminals, while having just a short-range, "user-on/off-able" for the rest of us. Would be a nice way to use an ATM, buy a busticket, whatever...

  198. Re:GPL - Intellectual Theft? by sysop0130 · · Score: 0

    FYI, GPL stands for the GNU "General Public License".

    --
    -------
    "People who do not break things first will never learn to create anything." -Philippine Proverb
  199. Re:Have you hacked into the FBI or the US governme by sysop0130 · · Score: 0

    Anyone ready for some reverse engineering?

    --
    -------
    "People who do not break things first will never learn to create anything." -Philippine Proverb