Slashdot Mirror


Making Your Room Quiet

el_flynn writes "This may be a cure for those of you with loud computers, or perhaps those who spend lots of time in NOC rooms that generate lots of noise: NewScientist.com mentions about a "Silence Machine" that gets rid of unwanted noise. I want one to quiet down my neighbour's loud dogs. " These are also being tested in cars, to make the car quieter. I've got a pair of the headphones that the article alludes to - they make airplane travel much nicer, and having something like this to cancel machine noise would be excellent.

389 comments

  1. Noise cancelling headphones by slithytove · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tried out a friend's pair of Bose noise cancelling headphones with an iPod in a crouded restaurant the other day.
    I was absolutely amazed- I'd tried cheaper noise cancelling technology years ago and not really been able to tell the difference, but this time I was turning the noise cancellation on and off with glee!
    I hope they catch on so we can get some volume pricing going:)

    1. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by AstroMage · · Score: 1
      Yep,

      Definitly worth waiting for the prices to come down... :-)

    2. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took some from the airport....they're alright, not too good tho

    3. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1, Funny
      ...and having something like this to cancle machine noise would be excellent.

      Wow, you're almost good enough to be a slashdot editor!

      ...Wait

    4. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by vandemar · · Score: 5, Funny

      The other day I let a friend of mine use my noise cancelling headphones to listen to a CD he just bought. After fiddling with his CD Walkman for a bit, he still wasn't able to hear anything on the headphones. It turned out the CD he bought was N'Sync's greatest hits album, and the headphones were actively cancelling out all the noise from it leaving only the real music (ie silence).

    5. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's assholes like you that make the rest of us pay so damn much on our plane tickets.

    6. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by Regolith · · Score: 1

      I wish they would make some regular headphones like their aircraft headsets. Those have these great gel ear pads that are the most comfortable things that I've ever worn and work great at eliminating noise. I tried them out in one of the Bose stores (very noisy, lots of different music styles from demo units) and I could barely hear anything from the stereo systems being demoed. Great stuff.

      --

      Bow before my sig, for it is good.
    7. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tough shit, get another job peasant.

    8. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      silence............
      The only thing to be heard after that pretty bad joke

    9. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We that don't enjoy the music of uNsync enjoyed the joke

    10. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by delcielo · · Score: 2

      I use a David Clark noise cancelling headset when I fly (I'm an instructor, so this is quite often). It's fantastic. It blocks the low frequency noise while still allowing me to hear things like the stall warning, gear horn, etc.

      In a single-engine airplane it makes a big difference. In a multi-engine airplane or jet, it's like magic. It makes you wonder how we ever got by without them.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    11. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Could you hear the people asking you to turn your headphones down?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    12. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by g0at · · Score: 1

      And you're posting non-anonymously to admit that this "music" fan is your friend? 8)

    13. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      22nd December 1980, Stiff Records (apparently) released an album titled 'The Wit and Wisdom of Ronald Reagan'.

      It's silent.

      http://www.vinylvulture.co.uk/pages/images/recor ds / eagan.jpg

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    14. Re:Noise cancelling headphones by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      *£&&%£&$£ing lameness filter!

      Make that reagan.jpg and it works.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  2. Really want to quiet the dogs? by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 0, Funny

    I want one to quiet down my neighbour's loud dogs.
    I suggest a .22 in place of the quiet machine

    1. Re:Really want to quiet the dogs? by dperkins · · Score: 0, Troll

      I want one to quiet down my neighbour's loud dogs. Actually, since the .22 might be trouble if you're in town, try soaking a bunch of sponge in bacon/hamburger grease, tearing it into pieces, and feeding it to the dog(s).

      After a little while, the sponge expands, the dog grows quieter, moves around a little less...

      --
      My sig hates me. That's ok, I never cared for it much anyway.
    2. Re:Really want to quiet the dogs? by guiding_knight · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no no. That'll just create more noise, that of gunfire. We musn't add to the problem.

      That said, used a silenced gun. No worries! :)

      --
      LOTR: Elijah Wood is a munchkin asshat. Yes, asshat. LOL.
    3. Re:Really want to quiet the dogs? by jcoy42 · · Score: 1

      That's actually a bit extreame. Last time I checked some states had pretty severe penalties for killing a dog.

      I've had problems with barking dogs in the past, and I found tossing them a hot dog with a asprin in it knocked them out, which ment I could get back to sleep. How much depends on the dog. I've used around 8 for a big dog with sucess.

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    4. Re:Really want to quiet the dogs? by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 3, Funny
      No, no no. That'll just create more noise, that of gunfire.

      Yes, but it'll create such noise only once... :-)

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    5. Re:Really want to quiet the dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, why? Shouldn't there like, be a reward or an award or something instead?

    6. Re:Really want to quiet the dogs? by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      if you use the silence machine then maybe even the silencer wont be heard.. ... hold on why would you kill an innocent little animal :( sadistic meanie.

      --
      hmm sooner
  3. Well, by MattCohn.com · · Score: 0

    That might work, but then the sound of me killing myself because I would have to use a mac might defeat the purpose.

    1. Re:Well, by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that last comment was suppost to be a reply to the first comment.

    2. Re:Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could use poison - that could be pretty quiet?

      And stop mac bashing! they are great (well.. so long as you dont need to actually use it as a computer) - they make great ornaments, and the new iMac makes a great drinks table.

  4. Dells by rosewood · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a PC consultant / PC Builder / Small time business OEM provider / AMD Fanboy

    Anyhoo, a company I do a lot of work for recently gave all agents brand spankin new Dells. While they are the shities P4s available and they are paired up with SDR mem - they are REALLY REALLY quiet. My trick of the trade is to get 1.2 GHz Durons and take the voltage down and underclock them, then they run nice and cool and there are some quiet fans out there and I use a nice sparkle psu that has a quiet fan on it, but I can still hear them in a small office. This P4 however is damn near silent. They have not been in dusty office environment long enough for me to tell you if the fans go over time, etc.

    I know the computer lab @ my school (in the chem library at least) has a bunch of the almost same Dells (same hardware, different case) and its whisper quiet in there

    You can do quiet cases with full clocked AMD AXPs - look for the screw mountable Zalman HSF @ www.2cooltek.com - it comes with resistors to slow / quiet the fan down. Good airflow / tied down wires help a lot to keep the case quiet. Also, check out the sparkle PSUs -- lots of power, little noise.

    PPS - Silent water rigs are popular since only one fan is needed for the radiator and you can get pretty big fans that run nice and quiet

    1. Re:Dells by Octorian · · Score: 1

      AMD AXPs? I didn't know AMD made Alpha processors.

    2. Re:Dells by Danse · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I'm just realizing I need to get a new fan for my Athlon XP. I have a Thermalright SK-6 heatsink and a Delta fan that is loud as all hell. I want a quieter fan, but I'm a gamer and I need something that will still keep my CPU cool under heavy use. I haven't heard about any other fans that perform as well as this one, but are relatively quiet. If anyone has suggestions, then I'm open to ideas. Otherwise I may end up looking into this noise canceling thing. Though I don't think it'll help in my situation :(

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    3. Re:Dells by crnium · · Score: 1

      This seems to be a better idea. Why not actually make the things that make noise quiet when possible? If Apple can make a silent machine, why can't other manufacturers? Spend your $$$ on something that's quiet to start with, rather than more cash to get rid of noise that shouldn't be there in the first place.

    4. Re:Dells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no, you retard. Alpha's were built by Microsoft. AMD builds PowerPC cpus.

      Get it straight!

    5. Re:Dells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, dells are surprisingly quiet. My company has a number of different Optiplex models and they're nearly silent. We've even got a couple of the old Dimension mini-towers that are getting on in years but still run fine. I pulled about a pound of cat hair out of one that had been running at someone's house for a year or two.

    6. Re:Dells by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      I made the mistake of getting an XP1800 and a 'quiet' fan. (Zalman flower FWIW). It is very quiet indeed, unfortunately my operating temperature sits around 50degrees idle and up as high as 56 under load....

    7. Re:Dells by Bnonn · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The problem with watercooling, I would imagine, is not so much the cost as the weight. Water is damn heavy stuff; even a small amount will considerably add to the weight of a case. When you've already got those damn P4 heatsinks, a few hardrives, CD-RW and DVD and of course the PSU, it adds up.

      Course, I've never really hefted a water-cooled rig before, so I could be wrong, but that's always been the thing I've wondered about it. If it's as heavy as it sounds, it's no wonder I didn't see any at the last lan. Now, on the topic, I think the parent post does raise a good point. As Tim Williamson says in the article, "it probably will have some applications, [but] it would seem far easier and more sensible to avoid making noise in the first place." I have to agree. This sound dampener is really nifty, and proof-of-concept of something I've had in my book for a while because it's the kind of thing that's great for privacy in medbays etc, but it's treating the symptoms, not the cause. Obviously the cause can't always be treated, and there is surely place for these devices, but I think it's also important to try to prevent noise pollution simply by trying to create technologies etc that are quieter in the first place.

      Yeah, just shifting the cost, I know.

    8. Re:Dells by rosewood · · Score: 2

      Well, I have built me one water rig

      I used a very expensive alluminum case and w/o the radiator and fans it was very VERY light. Adding the radiator, fan, and water did not add enough weight to it where it FELT heavier then your average case. My main rig however is a meter tall full tower w/ wheels. I thought about making it water cooled since I have more then enough space in here

      However, there are a lot of the $40 newegg.com specials that if your two HDDs and CDRW + DVD are mounted in the 5.25" slots then you can removed the 3.5" hard drive bay (or dremel it out if you have to hold it there for a floppy drive) that give you pleny oh room for a radiator and fan. With proper securing mechanisms, that water rig will stay very tight during movement to LANs. Also, you can mount the Hard Drives in one of those silent holders that cushins the HDD so you wont have movement HDD issues to keep the case more protabale and even quieter.

    9. Re:Dells by chamenos · · Score: 1

      i'm using a global win WBK68-II and its really really quiet...i haven't had my computer this quiet since i stopped using my PII450 with the stock intel hsf its rated as supporting up to the xp2000+ so i'm guessing the performance should be more than adequate unless you overclock your processor a lot. and btw 50 to 56 degrees is still pretty ok...your cpu isn't going to burn up anytime soon so don't worry its only hot by overclocker standards. no offence to any of them but a lot of them are pretty clueless about the actual critical temperatures, etc, and just follow whatever those overclocking guides tell them. cheers =]

    10. Re:Dells by billcopc · · Score: 1

      While it may be true that 56'C won't kill a cpu (they're rated safe up to 85'C), keep in mind that temperature is sensed in the small gap beneath the processor. On the other side, you have to deal with heat from everything else, which includes hard drives, video cards and the motherboard itself. If it's 56'C on the bottom, it's at least 60-65'C on top. That's where it can get real scary real fast.

      I've damaged an Athlon not too long ago because of this phenomenon. The moral of the story ? If you're paranoid, buy a cheap themistor kit and wedge it on top of the CPU in the small depression around the raised core. That's the temperature you have to keep an eye on, especially if you're overclocking.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    11. Re:Dells by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Yes, I can attest to the fact that Dell desktops are whisper-quiet. They're using Pentium-4 processors that slow down automagically during heat emergencies. Try doing some heavy processing, like playing RTCW while encoding DivX video. It'll be fine at first, but after about a minute it will start getting really choppy as the CPU struggles to stay cool.

      Still, for regular office work they're excellent, and that's what they're built for in the first place. But anyone using them for intensive graphics/audio is absolutely nuts!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    12. Re:Dells by Danse · · Score: 2

      Hmm. With my current setup, my temp is about 37C idle and about 42C under heavy load (i.e. playing Jedi Knight 2 for an hour). I'm comfortable with those numbers. I've seen athlons run pretty hot (65-70C) for a long time without much problem, but I'm not sure how daring I want to be in that department. I think I can probably get away with using a slightly less effective fan, but I'm going to have to do the research to figure out which one will give me the best balance between temperature and decibals.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    13. Re:Dells by rosewood · · Score: 2

      That heat thing has not been debunked yet?

      Anyways - they are not designed for office work - they are designed for "The Web" crap. ALU is the P4 weak point and ALU is what regular office work is all about

  5. White noise by sparcv9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know about the rest of you guys, but I find it difficult to sleep at night without the whoosh of the fans from the handful of servers I keep in my room. What kind of geek likes quiet machines?

    --

    This is not a Fugazi .sig
    1. Re:White noise by gerbache · · Score: 1

      hehe, it's just like people who run a standard room fan all the time, only my system is higher pitched. I have problems sleeping anywhere else anymore, though, just because the sound isn't quite right.

      Besides, when I shut my computer down, the room is just so bloody silent that I can't stand it!

    2. Re:White noise by josh+crawley · · Score: 3

      Actually, I was going to mention that. The fans put me in some sort of happy-trance.. soft of like self-hypnosis. It usually takes me about 30 minutes longer to go to sleep WITHOUT fans of some sort.

      Even the sad thing with me, is that I know the particular pitch of the fans. I can tell which devices are on just by the pitch.

    3. Re:White noise by sparcv9 · · Score: 2
      Even the sad thing with me, is that I know the particular pitch of the fans. I can tell which devices are on just by the pitch.
      Well, since mine are on 24/7, I don't have that kind of indicator. I do, however, enjoy the fact that the whooshes are not synchronous, so they produce a nice, ever-changing medly of white noise.
      --

      This is not a Fugazi .sig
    4. Re:White noise by oo7tushar · · Score: 1

      funny story to that. I have a lot of linux boxes in my room and it gets nice and warm (the heating bill this winter was the lowest ever). Any how, I got in a car accident a while back and had some minor head injuries. As luck would have it I had to get a new bed at the same time and was unable to sleep in my room. For the first few nights the head injury caused me to get tired and go to sleep, but after a few nights I couldn't sleep, I was always worried about the computers and everytime the cron.daily would start writing to the hard drive I wouldn't hear the customary hard drive sounds and I'd panic and wake up (sleeping in the room right next to mine).
      That said, I swear that after a year in the room with the machines you get used to them and they're like your little babies. This story has not point to it, just thought I'd share.

    5. Re:White noise by sparcv9 · · Score: 2
      I was always worried about the computers and everytime the cron.daily would start writing to the hard drive I wouldn't hear the customary hard drive sounds and I'd panic and wake up (sleeping in the room right next to mine).
      I know what you mean. Although, ever since I got an 8:30-5 Day Job, I know that if I'm still awake when the nightly jobs kick off, it's way past my bedtime.
      --

      This is not a Fugazi .sig
    6. Re:White noise by antibryce · · Score: 5, Funny
      hahahahah


      I read that and immediately thought "Wow, sounds like my last roommate." Then I look at the userid and guess what...it *IS* my former roommate. :)

    7. Re:White noise by josh+crawley · · Score: 2

      I wasnt quite clear. I dont JUST have computers. I have miscellanous electrical equipment. Amongst these things that have fans, there are: O-scope, 3 computers, signal anaylyzer, box fan to put heat outside (I love cracking my window open even in winter), a few rackmount devices (24 port hub, 16 port switch, 1u 400mHz p2), assorted power supplies to deliver regulated current throught my room (that pesky 120 vac is too, umm, yucky ;-).

    8. Re:White noise by Arimus · · Score: 1

      Too true - I tend find the sound of total silence very worrying as it means that we've probably lost power or all the servers have died - in which case I've got alot of work heading my way (or would have when the managers release that emailing me to say email is down is rather a waste of the PHB's time...)

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    9. Re:White noise by Aaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      What kind of geek likes quiet machines?

      The kind that doesn't like to have their SO yelling at them all the time for having "all those damn noisy machines." Ever hear the noise that a 500W p/s and a pair of full height Micropolis SCSI drives makes inside an ancient AT&T WGS case (think industrial overkill) makes when you power it on? Now that's music to lull you to sleep (IMO)...

      --
      Give them an inch and they'll take a foot. Much more than that, you won't have a leg to stand on.
    10. Re:White noise by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Me.

      Some people like white noise in the background. Those of us that didn't grow up in urban areas or with a fan running all night often don't. The white noise isn't constantly annoying to me anymore, but I'd much prefer a quiet machine if I can manage to get one.

      One of the major reasons I'm putting off buying a new machine is that heat dissipation on all the newer CPUs/motherboards is ridiculous. I don't want a louder system.

    11. Re:White noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right here, and I only have one box active right now. It's a beast that's been stripped down to four fans (Including the power supply). Athlon 600, one of the original slot models that get ridiculously hot over a large area. *snicker*

      I opted for cheap solutions on the box, as I didn't have money to waste on high-end brand name fans. I was pleasantly rewarded with a rather nice rumble that sounded like my box was about to take off. Indeed, from five feet away (Around eight if one wasn't wearing shoes), you could feel the floor vibrating from the box.

      That's when I realized triple fans on the processor, a chipset fan for the video card, two case fans and the HD cooler were.. A bit extreme. I scaled back to one on the processor, one case, and the HD cooler. I've never had a problem with overheating, and the noise is quite acceptable.

      People who aren't used to it still seem bothered by it, but I find myself unable to bear total silence now. I *need* the whir of fans to concentrate. Hmm. *chuckle* I'm betting some doctors could make some nice change studying this 'disorder'.

      Ahh.. I'm getting a new box though, and have the money to buy ultra-quiet top of the line fans. I just hope that the noise will be within my accustom range. :/

    12. Re:White noise by rark · · Score: 2

      what's even worse -- I have been known to wake up from a deep sleep in a panic because the fans suddenly go quiet (due to electrical failure).

      sad but true

    13. Re:White noise by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Nobody cares. Nobody is impressed.
      Who the hell leaves O-scopes and service monitors on all the time anyway? That's right: nobody who actually owns them.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    14. Re:White noise by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Who the hell leaves O-scopes and service monitors on all the time anyway?

      Oscilloscopes make patterns that are not just beautiful art, they also convey great troubleshooting information. I used to leave an oscilloscope on to watch the clock signal or an address line on an experimental overclocking project. The output of the clock must be clean and pure, because anything less than a square wave can trigger an earthquake of bad timing on the bus. A debugging must for overclockers.

      Another place to use the scope is on the address lines, where beautiful patterns can be observed. You can detect when certain subroutines are being entered. Its like watching your system's behavior in a fractal sort of way. Its the visual equivalent of leaving a floating input of an amplifier laying across the motherboard.

      I'd strongly recommend owning a scope. Unlike a voltmeter, a scope provides a detailed visual of intermittent problems. Very handy for troubleshooting hard to find problems in your car, for instance. Loose connections always show up with a characteristic noise, undetectable on a voltmeter.

    15. Re:White noise by eudas · · Score: 1

      yeah i have the same sort of thing.
      when the power goes out or something, the lack of computer fan sound makes silence seem like something weird and out of place.

      eudas

      --
      Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
    16. Re:White noise by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I know how to use a scope. And already have one.
      But I don't leave it on all the time. That's the whole point of my message. Why the hell would you leave it on all the time?
      The only thing I ever leave on is my service monitor, and that's on left on tube heat because the damn thiung takes so long to preheat and get stable. Other than that....the shite gets turned off.
      Those of you who have pregressed past your parents paying the utility bills probably do the same.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    17. Re:White noise by antibryce · · Score: 0
      Well, since mine are on 24/7, I don't have that kind of indicator.

      I can only wish for 99.9% uptime in the bedroom.

    18. Re:White noise by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I know that feeling. About 2 weeks ago I walked into my house and suddenly felt a disturbance in the force. By the time I took 5 steps into the house I was going over why my router was down, just because I could tell it's fan was gone. Not too shabby considering there were 3 computers in the room along with 2 monitors.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    19. Re:White noise by prwood · · Score: 1

      I have used fans to help me sleep for quite some time. If I am having trouble sleeping, I hook up just a regular Holmes mini-turbo fan (a free-standing fan, not a computer fan) and turn it on. The noise and regular sound pulse it generates helps me to sleep, especially if there is something noisy in the next apartment or outside.

    20. Re:White noise by Droog · · Score: 1

      Your comment reminded me of my first disk drive for the family's Apple ][+.

      It was so loud that you could tell what program was loading by the clicks of the drive.

    21. Re:White noise by motorhead · · Score: 0

      I don't mind too much being at work when the nightly backups start. I hate like hell still being there when they finish.

      --
      Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
    22. Re:White noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just put it in his/her mouth, you fucking idiot.

    23. Re:White noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true Slashdot misanthrope... Ever wonder why you don't have any friends?

    24. Re:White noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya, the same will happen to you in a server room. Our computer room lost power once due to a main UPS failure.. I hate when that happens.

    25. Re:White noise by rark · · Score: 2

      ech. been there, done that, too.

      But I try very hard not to sleep in the server rooms (I am not always sucessful, but it's been a good six or eight months since I last did)

  6. Cheap solution is near! by itsnotme · · Score: 5, Funny

    try breaking your eardrums, then you cant hear diddly.. and its cheaper than buying these 'quiet' solutions!

    I can say myself, I've been deaf since I was born ( I was born deaf ) so I can say that its the easiest solution since I cant hear diddly so all of my computers are supposedly "quiet" for me! Soundproof padding for my room? Nah! dont need it! :-)

    1. Re:Cheap solution is near! by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

      Your website disproves your deafness as you post movie reviews often.

    2. Re:Cheap solution is near! by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

      Umm sorry, i completely forgot about captioning.

    3. Re:Cheap solution is near! by itsnotme · · Score: 2

      :-) Yeah, and also they've got subtitles to boot. Some movie theaters also have what is called "Open captioned" movies where they put the subtitles on a few select movies so we can go watch 'em

    4. Re:Cheap solution is near! by Bnonn · · Score: 1
      Not to take the piss, but am I wrong in my understanding that noise pollution can be harmful even if you can't hear it? I can't pin down where I read it, and ianal, but isn't it the case that excessive sound waves have a physiological effect that is not consciously noticeable but can still cause fatigue etc?

      And if so, where does this leave the noise dampener? It's doubling the sonic wave output, after all. I presume that since the waves are counterphasic, they're pretty much dampened at the location of the user (by definition) so it's all okay, but there's still a lot of excess wave energy floating around. Can other people outside of the quiet zone hear this thing?

      Please, don't mod me down for asking ignorant questions...I'd rather you responded.

    5. Re:Cheap solution is near! by gr8fulnded · · Score: 1

      hehe... I dig that!

      I just take out my hearing aid and all is quiet :)

      --Dave

    6. Re:Cheap solution is near! by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I think it's only extremely low frequency, high amplitude waves that are uncomfortable.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:Cheap solution is near! by rudedog · · Score: 2

      There's also Rear Window Captioning, which is really cool. You're given a small piece of smoked plexiglass, and a mirror image of the captions is projected and reflected in the glass. You can go to movies with your hearing friends, and they see the uncaptioned movie normally, and you can see the captioned version.

      Sadly, not all movies come with RWC (Lord of the Rings :-().

    8. Re:Cheap solution is near! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, deaf people don't watch movies... Idiot.

    9. Re:Cheap solution is near! by itsnotme · · Score: 2

      True, I've used the system, Disney uses this system for a lot of stuff in their parks. Alas its also quite an annoying system since if there's a person sitting in back of you, it will more than likely block the reflection so you have to like move around and get in a good position which is pretty goddamn rare.. since it also more than likely annoys the hell out of the person behind you and they more than likely dont understand the system so you're pretty much fighting with the person behind you..

      Its a cool system tho, but I'd prefer the subtitles to be ON the movie itself so that there's less of a chance that I'd miss something, and I've talked with a lot of hearing people that they actually LIKE to see the subtitles because some movies are so loud that you cant hear people talking and they get to see what they said because of the subtitles, and it helps older people who cant hear that well anymore to boot..

    10. Re:Cheap solution is near! by rudedog · · Score: 2

      I've never had the signal blocked by people behind me. It must be in the deployment. I've only ever gone to the Cinerama in Seattle, but I saw Episode One there in a packed theater, and I had no trouble with the device (it was the first time I ever used it).

      I agree that some hearing people would prefer to see captions even if they don't need them. I know that my wife prefers them on. However, I also know people who don't like the captions. For instance, if I have one friend who has a caption-capable TV. He knows how to turn them on, since he does it whenever I'm over there. However, once I leave, he always turns them off again, which suggests that he'd prefer not to see captions on his programs.

      I doubt that you'll ever see permanent captions at the theaters, because marketing people are notoriously scared of trying new things if they think it might alienate their existing customer base.

    11. Re:Cheap solution is near! by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      Soundproof padding for my room? Nah! dont need it! :-)
      On the other hand, anyone who would break their eardrums on purpose just to have things be quieter, definitely deserves a padded room ;)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    12. Re:Cheap solution is near! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer subtitles. I often miss what's going on, despite having "perfect" hearing and I like being able to just glance down and read it. Helps that I read quickly though. My fiance has grown to like subtitles, but most of my friends dislike it. (But they've never really tried it, they just seem to dislike it on principle.)

      I converted them a little though, when we watched "The One" (Don't, it's really bad) and they asked for it to be rewound (does that term apply with DVDs?) many times in the first 15 minutes because gunfire was louder than the talking. (Thankfully, as it turned out.)

      Strangely though, I prefer dubs. :) I'll take a foreign movie, turn on the english soundtrack, and english subtitles.

      -- WNight posting from work...

    13. Re:Cheap solution is near! by itsnotme · · Score: 2

      Yeah, all this is starting to make me wonder, that if the theaters provided at least one movie with open captioning ( meaning that it had the captions/subtitles at the bottom ) and OPENLY advertised it and explained its good perks, if more people would go and enjoy it. Right now, movie theaters dont openly advertise open captioning so I'm pretty sure a large percent of the population doesnt know about it.. And I've seen large hordes of people go to foreign films and they dont have a problem with reading the subtitles and its openly advertised that it has subtitles so, makes me wonder what would happen if htey DID openly advertise it

    14. Re:Cheap solution is near! by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      so why don't they use a display on the seat infront for captioning? might be expensive putting a little screen or whatever but I would solve the issue.. or even a pop up screen one that can be pivoted above the seat.... the theatre would have to be planned for this with levels though.. the new theatres like the ones in kw like the galaxy and the silvercity are big enough I would think.. also optional seating or sections could reduce cost.. just a first thought.. you could also use a light wave encoder with encoder glases... but I don't know if people would want to use the glasses... might be costly aswell... you could always have the technology integrated for equality and equal opertunities etc.. while having the glasses sold as a product seperately or have deaf orginaztions fund some type of thing with government subsidy or something... there are lots of solutions. the cheap solution would be ear canal surgery with non organic system although I'm not a doctor and I guess the operation cost would be huge and due to the specialaztion the equipment would probably be large did I mention the capatlist all for yourself community sucks... hmm ok I still do have some negativity... well I guess there will be a solution that will be good as we will "eventually" have enough idle time to solve all the worlds problems (I can only hope)

      --
      hmm sooner
    15. Re:Cheap solution is near! by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      noise causing fatigue??? ... I can see it being used for massage... the vibration of woofer... yummy have you ever stood infront of a really big speaker kicking out bass and lots of it... feeling is so euphoric... if you don't like the noise just put some earplugs in.... it wonderfull. Of course since sound waves are vibration I can see that they could not only be used as a fatigue device but as a instrament to build muscle mass.... hmmm... it feels really nice though.. maybe too nice but as far a fatiuge hmmm thats like saying gravity causes fatigue... oh never mind so in some minute way since more weight would be acting upon your body with forces in motion towards you I could see it that way.. anyway everything you expereince sound wise causes a psychological effect which in turn will cause the brain to have a responding physical effect so even indirectly sound could cause fatigue at the same time it could do just the oposit I know happy hard core usually gives me energy aswell as good house or techno while trance in a non party enviroment especial of the melodic type much like clasical will relax me and make me at peace.. and almost in a trance...hmm it would inderectly since sound waves are vibration in atmosphere if sound waves are heard that means sound waves are hitting you.... damn bastard how rude!!! dont mind me I think I'm getting a sense of &&&&&& again...

      --
      hmm sooner
  7. Beyond! by aznxk3vi17 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I saw a similar invention used in "Batman Beyond" a while ago... I no longer watch it of course, but yeah the idea is intriguing. What worries me is the possible military uses. By cancelling sound, armies could cause mass confusion by making illusions of silence, deafness, the list goes on. I fear the day when I am sitting at home, and all of a sudden, the fan of my computer goes silent, and the clicking of my keyboard goes quiet. We wouldn't even hear the explosion.

    1. Re:Beyond! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      It's military uses would be limited. There's no way this machine would be able to overpower an explosion. It has to make 'anti-noise' at least as powerfull as the sound you're trying to cancel out. So it wouldn't be able to silence an explosion. It works best on lower level sound sources. The target would also have to be surronded by speakers & mikes, and if we're able to place those, there's more usefull things to put in.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    2. Re:Beyond! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know dude... you ever been to a Metallica concert? I'd say that's AT LEAST as powerful as an explosion.

    3. Re:Beyond! by bpowell423 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The military's "been there, done that". There's a practice B52 bombing run the goes over my parents' house. Pretty cool as a kid, we'd hear a B52 coming, and look up in time to see it disappearing just over the treetops. One night, my dad was outside looking at the sky. All of the sudden, a B52 flys over, low enough to make out the cockpit windows (that's how low they typically flew). Only thing was, there was no sound, just wind. Absolutely true. Sound cancelling technology has been around for a long time. For that matter, so have holograms. So, class, which of those silent B52's is the real one?

    4. Re:Beyond! by n-baxley · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Well, you knew that we couldn't have a story on slashdot without a paranoid, anti-establishment post getting modded up over 2.

      Sigh

    5. Re:Beyond! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, the engines could have been off

    6. Re:Beyond! by cannacoke · · Score: 1
      Makes me wonder how long ago this was. The technology of sound cancellation is an art form to say the least. A mic picks up ambient sound and creates a equal but opposite wave, effectively canceling out the original wave. The US army has been installing them on choppers because they basically know the sound the horizontal blades produce, but a b52? hmmm another case of the unexplained.

      The reason it works so well on a pair of head phones is that you are canceling the waves headed for your ears. You have to send the canceling wave in time with the original wave. On a object that is producing sound you would have to mic the sound and then produce a sound wave to send out at the same time the original sound wave is leaving the object. That's some power. I can see this as being new tech, but not as being around for a while.

      Oh My Head
      CanNaCoke

    7. Re:Beyond! by bpowell423 · · Score: 2

      I don't remember when that was... maybe late 80's? But seriously, if we now have sound cancelling earphones and sound cancelling equipment for server rooms, it's not too much of a stretch to think that the military's had it for a while. A B52 certainly has the space for a BIG amplifier and some really nice speakers! :)

    8. Re:Beyond! by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Unlikely. If the engines had been off, his dad could have heard the pilot screaming for help. Shutting off all engines in mid-air is NOT something you want to do because they will fuck up your wings' balance when you start them up again (and no two engines are perfectly synched).

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    9. Re:Beyond! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since most anything with functional value can be put to by bad people, I suppose we should eliminate any and all useful devices so that the military can use them? My gosh, I have knives in my house, masking tape (to gag prisoners), screwdrivers, fire-making sticks... oh no!

    10. Re: Beyond! by cannacoke · · Score: 1
      I saw this episode of "Buffy" where these monsters made everything quiet... That worries me.. if the monsters have this technology what will the government use against them?

      Oh My Head
      CanNaCoke

    11. Re:Beyond! by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      not this device maybe but it could be done with a speaker system ... but why would you silence an explostion.... say for a sabotauge type thing ... why would you use something like that anyway explosives are dangerous and expensive and non reusable why not well blah....

      --
      hmm sooner
    12. Re:Beyond! by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      the one that is non reflective

      --
      hmm sooner
    13. Re:Beyond! by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      unless of course you have a electro-magnet cobalt levetation engine

      --
      hmm sooner
    14. Re:Beyond! by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      party? :) First good thing I've heard related to a b-52 well.... ever

      --
      hmm sooner
    15. Re:Beyond! by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      you have fire making sticks I'm impressed.

      --
      hmm sooner
    16. Re: Beyond! by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      sound regenerators???? like every good weapon deserves a counter... and a couter counter... and another half billion in reasearch.. but really just ask the monsters politely to go away and not bother you. Or offer to give them a nice hug maybe just maybe you can make them nice monsters. You know like that monster on my pet monster not the beastor but even he had a soft spot... if all else fails just nuke the world right... answer allot of questions for everyone and also take out the fear of death thing but I think we will always have to worry about public speaking(oh so close to funny but falls short by just a smidge... the size of the grand canyon)

      --
      hmm sooner
  8. talk about old technology.. by Tairan · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Everyone knows that sound is a wave. If you output the opposite negative waveform of a sound, the noise is cancelled out. It's the same with light. This has been demonstrated for the last 200 years. High school physics, people. Also, there have been devices to do this for years. Cosco has them installed near their refrigerators. However, they only work well when the noise is a constant humm - a noisy crowd would still be noisy, however a fan blade will be a bit quieter. Granted, interesting story, however old, antiquated boring technology.

    --
    /. is a commercial entity. goto slashdot.com
    1. Re:talk about old technology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same with light.

      PARTICLE!!!
      PARTICLE!!!

    2. Re:talk about old technology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah. I agree. And, if you go near the speed of light,
      you can slow time and everything will look compressed.
      Old technology. So, why don't we do it? Because it's not
      easy.

    3. Re:talk about old technology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Particle man, particle man
      Doing the things a particle can
      /etc

    4. Re:talk about old technology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have NO clue how new this stuff truly is. What if, instead of a constant hum, there was a device that had a .. lets call it a rumble. This rumble was a chaotic function having about 7 varibles, which they then consist upon other varibles. Now, only using low power and low speed PU's (processing units: DSP's and cpu's) and using CAN's (controller area networks) , could you figure a way to actively cancel a chaotic sound function? Be aware, that latency is the ABSOLUTE BIGGEST FACTOR.

      I have seen it done, but I cannot say on which device. Let's just say it's quite impressive.

    5. Re:talk about old technology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have been adding numbers together and doing other math for thousands of years. I don't know why slashdot has to post some lame article everytime someone figures out how to do it better, or with a faster machine (e.g. new CPUs). Old news, move along.

    6. Re:talk about old technology.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is more that hes trying to create a cancelling sound-field. All the old tech just tried to create cancelling sound waves, which only works if you try to cancel it at the source or destination (the entrance to your ear) and in some very limited circumstances such as in a duct/pipe.

    7. Re:talk about old technology.. by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      why increasing speed would time slow.... relations of matter will always be at a constant the perception to judge the time at the ability to process the sensory input.... speed has no relation with universal energy makeup and relation unless of course you are saying that time is pocketed and not universal .. whatever science is just makebelive anyway right, ***clap my hands for tinkerbell*** I guess seeing is believing as far as unified string goes or whatever I don't see how speed can relate to time since speed is a cross of space and time not sole to time time is meerly the positioning of forces which are in a constant state of change although always at univeral constant minus the posibilities of inverse reality...atleast this is what I think

      --
      hmm sooner
    8. Re:talk about old technology.. by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the phase spider had both visual and audio cloaking not sure why I saw it though must have been the lowlight... only hope it was friendly

      --
      hmm sooner
  9. Stuff on ears? by limxdul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have 24 boxes total in my house, 2 of which are mid to high range servers... When everything is on, noise is a huge factor. My room itself has 4 comps, and when they are all on i have to have some music playing to deafen them out. THen again, i don't want to look like a eskimo with devices all around my ear...

    1. Re:Stuff on ears? by Octorian · · Score: 1

      It's amazing how so many people complain about the noise of their one or two computers... Maybe it's just that a single machine's noise sounds out of place or something.

      Well I'm the freak with 8 24/7 machines in his dorm room, and the whitenoise of them all together is quite audible. However, I actually like that noise. When I'm trying to sleep in a computer-less room, I often find it "too quiet", or a "deafening silence" of sorts.

    2. Re:Stuff on ears? by oo7tushar · · Score: 2

      I find that positioning the computers in a V format (kinda like chevrons as in a V contains two computers with the fans pointing in) helps reduce the noise. If you set them up in this fashion: >>>>>> then you get a nice breeze through the middle (air circulation) and the fans cancel each other out.

  10. Airports by chennes · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it would be possible to use this on a larger scale - say, on an airport runway. We have a lot of problems reducing the dB level coming out af a jet engine, and most research is focused on the engine design itself. Is it possible that we could at least reduce the amount of noise at ground level with something like this. I know the article says regular, predictable noise, but that in the future it could be expanded. How much power would this take, I wonder?? It would have tremendous implications for airport development, since one of the major impediments right now is neighbors' complaints about takeoffs.

    1. Re:Airports by laserjet · · Score: 2

      That's an interesting questions. I would guess you would need a TON of power to cancel out the sounds of a jet engine, but it would be an interesting question to ask an anti-sound engineer.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:Airports by chennes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I figured it would take an enormous amount of power, but given the increasing research costs into other methods (spraying water into the jet stream, using weird exit nozzles, etc.) it might be worth it anyway. While some of the noise reduction techniques actually increase the thrust of the engine, most of them cut into it pretty severely. And they're really, really expensive.

    3. Re:Airports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best method is several stinger missles.

      You shoot down a few planes and people get to be too afraid to fly in them.

      And then we bring back the dirigibles and life becomes more relaxing.

    4. Re:Airports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you have the nuts to joke like that after recent events......hmmm classless

    5. Re:Airports by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      could you use some form of walls? sound barries or even sound distortion mesh fences to break up the wave streams? might be more power friendly not sure if this would be usable though

      --
      hmm sooner
  11. PC Speaker? by ClickWir · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Would be really nice if the program could run as a background process (depending on cpu usage)with the mic plugged into the mic port on the sound card and the pc speaker as output. Maybe replace the pc speaker with something a little more robust. Would be really great if they could make something small enough to fit inside the computer to make it more quiet.

    1. Re:PC Speaker? by laserjet · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      moderators: why is this modded down? this has serious potential in the future and should not be discounted.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:PC Speaker? by charfles · · Score: 1

      yeah, i'm sure there can be software based solutions for this using the hardware already in your pc and probably alot cheaper than the ~1000 dollars for a domestic product.

    3. Re:PC Speaker? by tps12 · · Score: 1

      Last year I had already decided to buy one of those when I discovered that no such thing yet exists. :-( Also no luck finding any kind of free noise cancellation project. I can actually kind of understand why, since I could imagine people upgrading machines (requiring more fans) to have enough cycles to run their fan-cancelling program... But wouldn't it be cool to have like a "gear shift" that would set different levels of clock speed and noise cancellation?

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  12. that's great! by Skizamaskidz · · Score: 1

    Now I only wish they would invent something to block out all the flamebait posts(such as this). ;)

    1. Re:that's great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes genius, it's called the Threshold

  13. Frequency conversion by mar1no · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It'd be a lot better if they somehow just upped the sound frequency which the cooling fans produced to a higher frequency out of the hearing range of humans. Although I don't think my dog would like that much.

    --
    "you sonofabitch i didn't know!"
    1. Re:Frequency conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your typical cheap bearing cannot take the speed. Assuming fan only make noise on first harmonic (bad assumption) adult hearing limit of 16KHz divide that by 3 (# of blades) multiply that by 60 to get the RPM -> 320,000 RPM.

      I don't think that's feasible.

  14. this is cool! by laserjet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would love to have one of these, as I am a very light sleeper.

    That being said, the technology is the same thing as noise cancelling head phones (such as these, these, or these). These headphones simply rock if you have not tried them.

    alternatively, you can use more traditional methods to quiet things down, like insulation. Putting some dynamat in your car will really dampen the noise and make it nice.


    One thing I have always wanted to try for fun, is get a really sophisticated sound cancellation system with many microphones and many large speakers to broadcast the "anti"sound, and put it in a large area like a park or the mall.

    then, don't tell anyone about it and watch the puzzled look on people's faces when they can't hear each other.

    maybe it's not possible, but I sure do think it would be funny.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    1. Re:this is cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      It's not. Sorry to burst your bubble.

      Also, take note :

      * Light sabers are not real. Nor is "the force".
      * Q does not exist, and he will not spontaniously appear and ask you to join the continuum.
      * You will not stumble across a ring that makes you invisible, despite how useful it would be.
      * Humans can not go "super saiyan"

      Have a nice day.

    2. Re:this is cool! by Sir+Spank-o-tron · · Score: 1

      What GetSmart style Cone of Silence?

      --
      -- Spankmeister General
    3. Re:this is cool! by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      everything is a posiblity if it can be conjured in the mind. The limitation is only your imagination and your base of knowledge and resource.

      --
      hmm sooner
  15. bass by astafas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if this will stop bass vibrations. I work nights and during the day when I try to sleep I get my neighbor playing his music real loud. I can't hear the music, but the vibrations from the bass keep me up until I get out of bed go over and knock on his door to get him to turn it down. This would help if it could block bass vibrations, but I don't think I want to spend a four digit sum on it.

    1. Re:bass by blakestah · · Score: 2

      Bass is easy. It is a slow waveform, relatively easy to cancel, and relatively hard to keep out with thick walls.

      Geez - 4 digits sums ! This is really an undergraduate project that would involve two microphones, a low pass filter, an amplifier, an audio amp, and a speaker.

    2. Re:bass by geoswan · · Score: 2
      I wonder if this will stop bass vibrations.

      I wondered about this too, when I first read about it fifteen or twenty years ago. (I think it was an article in New Scientist then too.)

      Anyhow IANAP (I am not a physicist), but it seemed to me that for the waves to be exactly out of phase when arriving at your ear, the source of the anti-noise should be as close as possible to the noise -- or it should be right at your ear. If the anti-noise generator were 180 degrees from the source of the noise, as you approached or retreated from the noise sources, the two waves would go in and out of phase. The shorter the wavelength the more critical the location of the anti-noise generator.

      Bearing in mind IANAP, but it seems to me that this technology would work best with Bass.

    3. Re:bass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I can't hear the music, but the vibrations from the bass keep me up until I get out of bed go over and knock on his door to get him to turn it down. This would help if it could block bass vibrations, but I don't think I want to spend a four digit sum on it

      Well for a three-digit sum you can purchase a gun that would have the absolute effect you are looking for.

    4. Re:bass by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1
      Well for a three-digit sum you can purchase a gun that would have the absolute effect you are looking for.

      You mean a sleep gun? Well, he does want to sleep, but if he uses it on himself why does it have to be in gun form?

      And where can I get a sleep gun for three digits?

    5. Re:bass by utexaspunk · · Score: 1, Funny

      perhaps, if it's powerful enough, it could be loud enough to even cancel out the bass vibrations in your neighbor's apartment! he'd have to knock on YOUR door and ask you to turn your noise cancellation device down! :)

    6. Re:bass by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if this will stop bass vibrations.

      I didn't realize they made that much noise. They're only fish, after all. I suggest staying out of the water. ;-)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    7. Re:bass by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Chrome plated revolvers work best as they visually show effective packages of noise cancelling potential energy. You may call this noise canceling technology a catalyst since the potential energy is often not used, but triggers a desired reaction.

    8. Re:bass by Pig+Bodine · · Score: 1
      Geez - 4 digits sums ! This is really an undergraduate project that would involve two microphones, a low pass filter, an amplifier, an audio amp, and a speaker.

      I don't believe it is quite that simple. Adaptive noise cancellation uses a reference microphone (e.g. a microphone on the headband, or someplace away from the ear), two microphones in the ear and an adaptive filter. The filter processes the signal from the reference microphone and adds it to the signal going out through the speakers. The filter is tuned (e.g. using the LMS algorithm) to try to drive the signal at the ear microphones to zero.

      Without the reference signal and the adaptive filter, this won't work too well. You need something to cancel the signal with (the reference signal) and a way to adjust the cancellation (to take into account changes in the phase of the signal.)

      This might also be a senior level undergrad project if the undergrad in question was really strong on DSP. But it's not just a lowpass filter.

    9. Re:bass by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      this might be against the theme but why not just get earplugs or cushioned headphones(either sound ones or nonsoundonesmufflers). Might be less costly, but I guess you wouldn't have that story to tell.. hmm you could also even probably get sound proofing for four digets with the sound proofing.... hell soundproof his place if he uses music or makes music not only will it eleviate the sound but he might even like you for it rather than cranky about having to turn the music down..

      --
      hmm sooner
  16. So this means I can.... by unsinged+int · · Score: 1

    ...in the future surround my radio with something that selectively cancels out what I think is crap. Sort of like how I mute the television when some commercials come on because they're too annoying and there isn't anything else I want to watch, but this would be automatic. (Hehe...no comment on how this device could be used against that Celine Dion CD mentioned in the other article.)

  17. Quiet Machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I love having a quiet machine. I can actually sit in the room with it without it driving me batty. I have a new iBook which runs silent compared to my roomate's monster Dell Laptop which has a fan that runs all the time.

    -dan

  18. Cancles by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    I remember at the end of the NFL season, John Madden was going on and on about cankles. They'd zoom in on some guy's cankles, and he'd circle 'em. Pretty funny stuff.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  19. Great... by Faust7 · · Score: 0

    Do they have one that will cancel out the sounds of sex from the dorm room next to mine? Something anti-thump, anti-"Ooohh!!" perhaps?

  20. Fix My Tinnitus by Boulder+Geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps these bright folks can come up with something to fix my tinnitus. I can't even stay in a truly quiet room without going half mad from the ringing in my ears.

    --
    A well-crafted lie appears unquestionable - Dama Mahaleo
    1. Re:Fix My Tinnitus by Zarathustra.fi · · Score: 1

      I have the same problem also (I blame my youth), albeit I can't say I would really suffer from it. Anyway, I hear with my good ear that they have invented these "hearing aids" for people really suffering from tinnitus. They are small gadgets, pretty much like those used by people with really bad hearing, except that they only reduce the constant whining of one's ears. I'm not sure if they used exactly this very technology, but I hear it works. Never tried one though. You might want to search the web for it.

      --
      __
      Zarathustra.fi
      Modern man has no goal, no aim, no ideals.
    2. Re:Fix My Tinnitus by ross.w · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Jaycar Electronics in Australia have a kit for a white/pink noise generator that is supposed to help with this. The thoery is that the white noise drowns out the ringing but isn't intrusive. I don't know how effective it is. Jaycar Web site

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    3. Re:Fix My Tinnitus by KatieL · · Score: 1

      BBC had an article on a new approach for treating tinnitus:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1 88 5000/1885492.stm

    4. Re:Fix My Tinnitus by 5i · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It was my granddad who invented it. If memory serves Jaycar used to be his company (that or he sold rights to the kit to Jaycar).

      He used to have terrible trouble with tinnitus, and being the genius/inventor type that he was whipped up a simple enough device in his workshop to deal with the problem.

      The device worked excellently for him, although, unsurprisingly you need to fiddle with it a little to get it right (how would any piece of external equipment know what sounds you're hearing in your head?).

      I think some of the old folks that tried it had problems getting it "tuned right"; I suspect they were expecting something akin to a remote control - click the button and it just works.. but I couldn't imagine that being a major problem for any /. reader.. I also suspect (since the last I discussed it with him 20 years ago) that it's been refined quite a bit since then..

  21. Now I can hear when my roommate has a girl over by Kasmiur · · Score: 1

    It used to be I would be sitting playing on my computer and hear a OOOOOOOO!!! in the background. now i can either filter it out or listen for my pleasure.

    (/crude immature joke)

    --
    -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
  22. IBM Too by The+Fred · · Score: 1

    I work around IBM PC300GL workstations. They may be slow (P3s) but are pretty darn silent. In a general office environment, you cannot tell that they are on except for the lights. Unfortunetly, IBM doesn't seem to sell these dreams anymore.

  23. Large Scale Lab Noise by hyyx · · Score: 1

    I work 50% of my day in a computer lab. The room contains ~1000 machines (huge server types), all in a 50x50 [foot] room. The amount of noise is intolerable, and it's _other_ effects are even worse. I have to stand up and get myself straight sometimes, because a thousand fans humming can do strange things. I was just complaining about this to a group of people the other day.

    I like white noise, especially noise created by industrial machines and computers, but a lot of people do not. I cannot imagine what it is doing to people who dislike it to begin with (white noise being pumped throughout my company's cubicle farms). I will definately keep a close watch on this... anyone else have any suggestions for this type of environment ? (headphones are not an option)

    1. Re:Large Scale Lab Noise by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Have you ever tried noise cancelation headphones? I also work in a large lab (filled with noise hard disk arrays) and have often thought about getting some noise cancellation headphones.

      my problem is, i do not know how well they would work in that environment. I would think they would work well since the noise is constant and similar to a jet airplane, but i want to be sure before I buy some.

      so if you or anyone has tried them in a noise server room/lab, let me know how they worked.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:Large Scale Lab Noise by oo7tushar · · Score: 2

      yes I do, headphones aren't because people will talk to you right?

      ok, you need fabrics, cloth that sort of stuff. Get cloth chairs, anything that will absorb sound. You don't want solids because they create that sound you get when you cup your ears.

      Try putting up a cork board near your desk as well, you can post stuff to it. Try getting cubicle walls that are fabricy.

    3. Re:Large Scale Lab Noise by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      just taking a stab at this, but when you have 1000 machines in a 50x50 room, you're gonna need a whole lot more aire flow than your standard a/c can produce, unless, of course, this room doubles as the main oven for the cafeteria or somthing :). The fans on the actual computers are only one source of noise. The room's cooling system is another major factor. You may want to look into how exactly the air comes from the outside, what exactly is filtering it, and what kinds of air filters are on your return air. Think of the room as a very large computer case - the smoother the air flow, the less air that needs to be pushed at high force through the system (case). If airflow was increased by 50%, you could drop the a/c usage by 50% (because of easier airflow), and probably at least a 30% cut in noise/general vibration (ac runs at less power, vibrates less, ect).

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:Large Scale Lab Noise by stripes · · Score: 2
      Have you ever tried noise cancelation headphones? I also work in a large lab (filled with noise hard disk arrays) and have often thought about getting some noise cancellation headphones

      Things are far from silent in a machine room with ANR, but it is much better with them on (it sounds a little quieter, but I can stay in much much longer).

  24. busted!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That episode aired a couple of days ago... I know because I saw it!!

    Batman is fighting this super audio researcher guy, and the audio guy turns on the quiet thing. They're fighting in a factory, so batman is constantly being hit by machinery that he normally would have head coming. Bruce Wayne (in batman beyond, bruce is too old to fight and serves as a mentor to a highschool-aged batman, Terry) is outside the building and can't hear the fight.

  25. Batman the Animated Series thought this up... by kisielk · · Score: 1

    a long time ago. I rememeber one episode where a villain used all sorts of sound devices, one of which was a noise cancelling device that he used to move about undetected. He would activate the device which would emit anti-noise to the noise that he made while moving, making him move silently. I doubt that the technology is up to this level quite yet, but hey, it might be possible in the future.

  26. Dogs by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    "I want one to quiet down my neighbour's loud dogs."

    I spend a few weeks on the island of Trinidad (near Venezuela) and I swear I could hear every freaking dog on the island at night doing something like this:

    [00] Dog 1: Arf!

    [01] Dog 2: Woof!*

    [02] Dog 1: WOOF!**

    [03] Dog 2: Woof!**

    [04] Dog 1: WOOF!**

    goto 02;

    *(Translation: Shut up!!)
    **(Translation: No YOU shut up!!)

    Multiply this by about a hundred thousand dogs.

    To quiet down the dogs, whenever they get loud, throw a pork chop over the fence specially marinated in tobasco sauce. I am not a dog owner but I heard it may work.

    1. Re:Dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dogs love tabasco. I spill it on my finger and they lick it off happily. Also, they love wasabi, I can give them a whole chunk and they scarf it down.

  27. The Cone of Silence! by Vic · · Score: 2

    This was already done in the Get Smart! T.V. series.

  28. Wouldn't work that way.. by Zarathustra.fi · · Score: 1

    This method only works when you can create the anti-sound near the origination place of the real sound. You really need to kill that sound before it starts to reflect from other materials, get carried by the wind etc.. In practice, no one can do a remote quiet-down on you with this technology (although, I presume, it would be possible in laboratory environment).

    If we want to think of possible military uses; this could be used for a kind of stealth technology. You could "case-mod" a military vehicle with a giant version of this anti-sound machine and make it virtually silent. Ofcourse, it would be pretty vulnerable and at the same time expensive and would only work when the environment is on your side. Thus, I don't think the military would ever implement this in their real designs. The expenses would be considerably bigger than the profits, simple.

    --
    __
    Zarathustra.fi
    Modern man has no goal, no aim, no ideals.
    1. Re:Wouldn't work that way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can imagine the several military applications. The current trend in military tech is more towards "low intensity" conflicts, which are often fought in urban areas (Think Beirut, Chechnya, or the current situation in Israel). There will be plenty of background noise in such places that makes it extra hard to detect sound.

      * It can silence helicopters and small armored cars. If the vehicles is fast enough, it can be upon the enemy with only a second to prepare.

      * How about a "Silence Box" on a machine gun? Probably not on a big .50, but there are smaller calibers that are less noisy to begin with. A rapid-firing gun whose sound level is below the background noise can be used to assault a buildings ground floor and the reinforcements in the cellars will not even hear it.

      * The more advanced silence device can muffle shouts fro reinforcements or make radio calls difficult to understand. Sure, the enemy can radio, but will the other side understand?

    2. Re:Wouldn't work that way.. by Zarathustra.fi · · Score: 1

      * How about a "Silence Box" on a machine gun? Probably not on a big .50, but there are smaller calibers that are less noisy to begin with.

      Perhaps you haven't heard, but they already have this thing called "the silencer". Keep it simple, stupid, and don't re-invent the wheel, figuratively speaking. ;)

      --
      __
      Zarathustra.fi
      Modern man has no goal, no aim, no ideals.
    3. Re:Wouldn't work that way.. by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1

      Well, they could slap some of the speakers mentioned earlier to the side of your house, and the with some directional microphones...

    4. Re:Wouldn't work that way.. by billy_troll · · Score: 0

      silencers however heat the gun barrel a lot more and reduce the muzzle velocity of the bullet, this device however wouldnt have any of those side effects, also silencers arent very effective on automatic weapons because of the cartridge
      eject (big hole -so noise comes out of it) although if the bullet is supersonic, they hear the sonic boom anyhoo.

      --
      -----im billy troll----- im better than you at everything you do.
    5. Re:Wouldn't work that way.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree KISS, but a silencer doesn't silence the sound of a gun shot it lessens the noise and makes the gunshot sound like something else. It doesn't sound like it does on tv.

    6. Re:Wouldn't work that way.. by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      hmm all you would have to do is make inverse wave forms..... its not difficult.... the problem is doing it at a range of completeness either that hmm there would be a couple ways of going about it I think

      --
      hmm sooner
  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. I can't hear you!!!! by nickynicky9doors · · Score: 2

    How many early Monday morning lectures did I pray for something like this? Every teenager who reads about this is getting a read on their parent's voice(s).

    --

    heuristic algorithm seeks stochastic relationship
  31. Heard about this about ten years ago by christopherjs · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember hearing of this technology/idea about ten years ago on a technology show called "Beyond 2000" (anyone else remember that show?)

    The suggested uses for the noise cancelling device was actually to place the device on the actual noise-making machine, not to create a device that "cleans" the area of noise, like the device mentioned in the article or like the noise cancelling headphones.

    The idea was to create things like noiseless lawn mowers and noiseless vacuum cleaners. I always wondered why I never saw these devices.

    This unit seems useful in that it can block out certain types of noise, but considering these people expect to charge over $1400 US for this, I can see why there never was a noiseless lawn mower...

  32. In-box silencer by el_flynn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about this idea: have an extra soundcard installed in your machine, hook it up to a small mic and speaker, and put the mic and speaker inside the PC casing.

    Input from the mic would be fed to some app that could analyze the sound coming in, generate the appropriate cancellation frequencies and output via the speaker. Tada - quiet PC!

    Of course you wouldn't want the mic to be on continuously - there would be feedback when the mic accepts signals from the speakers. But we could possibly run a cron job that turns on the mic while shutting the soundcard output, and perform the analysis once every minute/5 minutes/whatever your fancy. This would be a good way to make use of your spare cycles.

    Howzat?

    --
    The Wknd Sessions - Malaysian and South East Asia independent music
    1. Re:In-box silencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great Idea.

      Time for a new Source Forge project?

    2. Re:In-box silencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only see one problem with such a setup: If a fan in a PC case starts making odd noises, I can hear it and investigate the cause. I'm sure this has saved many of my CPUs from overheating so far, and I wouldn't want to give that up just to have a silent PC.

      A healthily whirring PC is therefore better than a silent PC.

    3. Re:In-box silencer by jenssoderberg · · Score: 1
      On a sidenote, i'm working hard on my out-of-box silencer system, featuring an all analog setup. :-)

      My only problem is the heat buildup in my closet..

      --
      /. AC "Concrete lifejackets could get certified under ISO2002"
    4. Re:In-box silencer by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      Have you considered venting to the attic? I have benn thinking about putting a grill in the ceiling of my closet and a grill near the floor in the door. I am kind of hoping that a passive convection type thing will happen so I won't need a fan...

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
  33. The real question by morcheeba · · Score: 2

    is what happens at the finges of this "shadow of silence". Does it start to break down such that the anti-noise and the noise become in phase again, and you get an area of double-the-noise?

    This is a lot more complicated than headphones. Headphones are relatively one-dimensional (one microphone, one speaker, one eardrum per circuit) - the only thing you have to worry about is not generating feedback.

    This seems to be a more complicated 3-dimensional solution, and it'll have much more complicated problems. Does this cancel noise effectively in corners? Will a computer monitor cast a non-noise-canceled shadow? Is there a limit to the noise source (can it be all around you, or must it be generated in one specific place?)

    questions... looking forward to the answers!

    1. Re:The real question by slaida1 · · Score: 1
      that's exactly what I was thinking when I read this:

      "...produce a personal "sound shadow" in which everything but the unwanted noise will still be audible.

      Then there was this:

      "...and loudspeakers for blasting that anti-sound at the incoming noise.

      If the incoming noise comes from everywhere around the place like in a train, then are the loudspeakers supposed to blast their anti-sound in all directions, too? I don't believe this machine can silence sounds as effectively as noise-cancelling headphones do. For starters, it creates more noise at other areas around "sound shadows" when these two sounds are not exactly out of phase, maybe even increase the audible noise where phase gets reversed, like you said. Secondly, since it can't predict the future and, what I figured from the article, is designed to silence the sound afterwards ie. after the start of it gets heard, it only works with predictable, "looping" sounds. ..or else it has to get input in advance as in microphone in between the noise source and the audience AND loudspeaker in between the microphone and the audience.

      It's is a box with a mic in the backside and a loudspeaker in front? And what does the computer do, have a complete 3D model of the target area with the mics, noise sources and the loudspeakers in it? If so, then it's probable that it (the computer) can give a 3d visualization about how and where silencing effects occurs and where total noise levels increase because of that setup, operator can then adjust it to minimize negative effects in areas where audience are.

      --
      Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
    2. Re:The real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This page has some more info :
      http://www.ewh.ieee.org/r10/bombay/news1/9.htm

      My guess is that the setup has 8 mics as an outer shell, 8 speakers slightly more to the inside, and 8 more mics even further inside (all configured in cube shapes). First set of mics picks up the noise, second serve to give the error signal to train the filter ... and what the speakers do is obvious.

    3. Re:The real question by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      what is faster a sound wave or a electron?

      --
      hmm sooner
    4. Re:The real question by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      "since it can't predict the future"

      Actually, it can predict the future! The sensing microphones are closer to the noise source than the cancelation speaker, so they receive the noise before the speaker has to generate it. At 340 m/s, 1 foot is about 0.1 milliseconds "into the future"; most speakers have a decent frequency response in the range of 1 kHz (1/0.1 msec) and could easily respond in time.

      Like the poster above said, it looks like it uses 8 noise-sensing microphones, 8 speakers, and then 8 microphones in the quiet zone to measure the sucess of the speakers and automatically make adjustments.

      In a 3d world, these sense microphones are essential because they are used to compensate when the environment changes. Stand up, and it needs to compensate. Move a chair, it does, too.

      It looks like the system would try to minimize the noise at these 8 places, and not worry about everything else. I'm guessing that these 8 microphones would have to be in relatively open air (kindof like your head is when you walk around - not in corners), and not near any local noise sources (such as the fan on yuor computer). Or, they may be built into the device, on a framework attached to the speakers and the front microphones.

      The TI 320c32 is a decent floating point processor - 20-30 MIPS / 40-60 GFLOPS. But, (IHALEWD - I have a little experience with dsps), I don't think it's enough horsepower to entirely model a room and do super-sophisticated stuff, but it looks like it would generally get good results.

      Automatically adjusting filters are neat - they can be tuned relatively easily, and since a large number of coefficients, they can describe some pretty complicated behaviour without a lot of programming. Of course, AFAIK, they assume linearity; if the air conditioner vibrations rattle a coffee cup on your desk, that's non-linear and probably won't get fixed.

      And, of course, this system may require some sort of calibration -- like a firecracker that you light near the noise source. (ok, maybe just something that makes test tones or a sharp snap). The microphones can get a picture of the room by listening to all the reflections (and by knowing what the initial sound was).

  34. Save money by shepd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Build this.

    Cost? About $10 - $20 depending on how much you have lying around. Best thing? It lets you use any headphones you like instead of being stuck with the inferior quality of many noise cancelling headphones.

    I've done it and it compares well to most sub $100 noise cancelling headphones.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:Save money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oversight - The audio channels themselves are inverted. The typical audio feaks won't like that.

    2. Re:Save money by fldvm · · Score: 1
      Cool site, but I don't know if you will save money. The last line says:

      "All in all, kind of fun and only around three times as expensive as if I had bought something from a store ;). "

    3. Re:Save money by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Cool site, but I don't know if you will save money.

      It may, it may not. It all depends on what kind of a deal you get on the parts. For me, I'm lucky to have a store that sells parts for about the same price as digikey nearby.

      For me, that project cost about $20/CAN (a lot of parts were free leftovers from old projects, though).

      I'd expect if you weren't as lucky as me, you'd spend a good $60 at Radio Shack. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  35. Re:Sad day ... Stephen King dead by Spazholio · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm gonna need some backup on this one....I've been scouring the news sites, and can't find anything about this...what radio station did you hear it on? They have a website?

  36. Two Selwyn Wright's ? by MarcoJROM · · Score: 1

    Apparently the inventor from the article is Selwyn Wright. Coincedentally, there's *another* Selwyn wright in the U.K., described in this article.
    It would be hilarious if these two were the same person, since this other guy is described as a thug "who has been the subject of almost daily calls to police over the past five years..."

    --
    "It was penguin lust...at its worst." --someone
  37. What about those of us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that have a loud discotheque in our neighbourhood? Open the window, and you can't sleep because of the noise; close the window, and you can't sleep because of the heat.

    1. Re:What about those of us... by oo7tushar · · Score: 1

      Go there, get really drunk and start throwing up on the sidewalk when the police is watching. They'll have their licence revoked.

  38. Dangerous : violates conservation of energy, by 0xB · · Score: 3, Funny


    So, there is a noise source producing sound energy and I have a so-called noise cancelling machine producing out-of-phase sound energy.

    The end result is no sound, therefore energy has been destroyed.

    This violates all the fundamental rules of nature.

    I urge you not to build this thing ... you will destroy us all in a terrible singularity of destruction.

    --
    0xB
    1. Re:Dangerous : violates conservation of energy, by oo7tushar · · Score: 2

      Energy is not lost. Sound is a wave, the canceling sound is a mirror wave. When two sounds meet you detect both but at one point you have to measure them both. So you take the average of the two and result is 0. You aren't destroying them, you're just taking the average as that's what we detect.
      The energy still passes through. It's been studied for a long time (play with a slinky, wave from each end, you'll see parts cancel each other out but the waves still carry through)

    2. Re:Dangerous : violates conservation of energy, by guiding_knight · · Score: 1

      No, energy lost by collision of atoms (AKA frictional force in most contexts) is not lost, but changed to thermal energy. Sound waves lose some energy as they move due to this 'friction', between atoms, which infinitesimally heats up the surrounding air. Twice the sound output would be twice the energy, and twice the neglible amout of thermal energy. Sound waves have a relatively small amount of energy (each atom moves very little before transfering the energy), so the effect is not noticable.

      In short, the kinetic energy of the waves changes into thermal energy, so the total energy is conserved.

      [/physics_rant] :)

      P.S.: I probably fell for a troll, but it was fun anyway :)

      --
      LOTR: Elijah Wood is a munchkin asshat. Yes, asshat. LOL.
    3. Re:Dangerous : violates conservation of energy, by Vireo · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, when the two waves cancel each other, yes, you do not detect any energy coming from the noise source. You just created an interference condition where this particular soundwave can't propagate. However, conservation of energy implies that the sound wave has been reflected back to towards the source. The Silence Machine thus acts like a thick solid wall for that specific soundwave.

    4. Re:Dangerous : violates conservation of energy, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to build? Sorry bud, this technology is nothing new. It's been used in aviation for years now. Active noise cancellation headsets are quite common now, and have been around far far longer than you might think. Even before it was used in headsets, it was used in the cabin of some airplanes to cut down on the noise, most notably in the Beech King Air series.

    5. Re:Dangerous : violates conservation of energy, by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      no waveforms are a representation of vibration vibration is a representation of forces inaction a force in action can be counter by an equal force a greater forces would counter but create a reverse level of opostion forces

      --
      hmm sooner
  39. So, how does it know which sounds to block? by mikerackhabit · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Perhaps someone with a bit more knowledge about this stuff can enlighten us all. How do I choose which sounds I want it block? It's all well and good for my computer to be ultra quiet but I don't want the scream of the platter as my hdd crashes and burns blocked out. It seems like it would take some pretty spiffy AI to figure out what are blockable sounds and what aren't. (this is more directed towards the 'advanced version' due out in a year or so)

  40. In this house... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we obey the laws of thermodynamics.

  41. This only works for low frequencies by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    Noise-cancelling systems have been around for a while. Basically, they work only when the cancelling speaker is within a fraction of a wavelength of the listener. It's a speed of sound limitation. You can cancel 100Hz for several feet, but 1000Hz for only a few inches. That's why noise-cancelling headphones work well, but large-area systems don't.

    You could build a system that cancels for a small target area from a distance, but it's going to produce twice the sound in other places.

    1. Re:This only works for low frequencies by Lionfire · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are three places you can put noise-cancelling systems to get the best cancellation. Most available systems are placed close to the listener, but they can also be placed close to the sound source. As long as the cancelling system is within a fraction of the wavelength of the sound source, it should work reasonably well for all listening positions. Obviously, this isn't always possible, especially if there are multiple or unknown sound sources.

      The third place to put a cancelling system is anywhere along the direct line-of-sight between source and listener. This should create a zone of silence along the line-of-sight. This techniques doesn't work very well indoor, because reflected sound can approach the listener from other directions, allowing unfiltered sound through.

      In summary, if you have access to the sound source and can place a cancelling system there (such as a fan inside your PC), you can get quite good results for any listening position.

    2. Re:This only works for low frequencies by bradm · · Score: 1
      You could build a system that cancels for a small target area from a distance, but it's going to produce twice the sound in other places.


      Well, actually, if you could combine this with one of the audio spotlights from http://web.media.mit.edu/~pompei/spotlight/ you'd have the perfect device for dealing with people like my neighbor who thinks it's his job to open the window and DJ for the entire neighborhood on sunny days ...


      (Hey, pal, JC Superstar, the Ike & Tina soundtrack, and Bruce Springsteen are okay, but not the same three in rotation over and over and over, okay?)

    3. Re:This only works for low frequencies by firecode · · Score: 1


      I don't exactly if how this noise-cancelling system work but article mentiones that it's most effective with repeative sounds (drills and
      also music with some degree).

      If the sound is repeative/has much correlation with itself (when time changes) then the future sound can be predicted quite well and noise cancelling probably works even with high frequencies.

      Standard statistical signal processing methods and neural networks could probably do quite a good job if the sound is predictable enough.
      If you have many microphones in a room you could probably train NN to give good noise cancelling response (I have only limited understanding of NNs) that guesses what kind the not yet arrived sound is and adapts to the "sound response of the room" which is probably non-linear.

    4. Re:This only works for low frequencies by hylo · · Score: 1

      >Noise-cancelling systems have been around for a >while.

      Actualy alot of you already use one...
      Some surround sound units use a system where noise or music from one channel is "cancelled" from the other channel... creating a third which can be delayed for a short moment to create a "room"

      maybe I am way off topic... hurmm

    5. Re:This only works for low frequencies by Brendor · · Score: 1

      Suposedly, expierimental composer John Cage expieienced a sound dampening room at MIT shortly before he died. He supposedly was ale to isolate two kinds of flowing noises, caused by blood rushing throgh his viens/arteries. He died of a stroke shortly therafter. Unfortunately, "this" this is the closest I thing to documentation I have been able to find. My original source was a professor's lecture.

  42. And I thought I was the only wierdo by shaldannon · · Score: 1

    I had a monstor Supermicro 750A case with associated fans, plus two double-sized fans on each Celeron processor. The result was a fairly loud and steady buzz. The first few nights sleeping in the same room was difficult. The next year and a half or so, it was impossible to sleep if they weren't running (it just sounded unearthly quiet). I've got a (quiter) Antec case now with (smaller, quieter) fans on P3 chips. I've adjusted, but it's still wierd sleeping without my server running.

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  43. Shut up! by atika · · Score: 1

    Nice technology, I wonder if it would help me with those annoying voices in my head :)

  44. Um... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want one to quiet down my neighbour's loud dogs.

    You know, they make a .45 caliber machine which performs this job adequately...been around for years.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With SOME dogs, there's an even easier way. Just have a staring contest with the dog and be sure to drive home the point that you are the dominant animal and that you really want the dog to be quiet. I have successfully used this with an annoying yippy dog who just would not shut up.

      Now, the important disclaimer. You absolutely MUST NOT do this with a dog unless you're calling the dog's bluff and the dog is really willing to be submissive. Otherwise, you will get bitten. Hard. Or maybe worse.

    2. Re:Um... by El+Volio · · Score: 2

      My grandfather did something better: he took a signal generator and hooked it to his amplifier/stereo, then left it on all night at max volume but at "dog whistle" frequencies... sure, he had to put up with one night of dog whining, but it cured the problem after that...

      --

      "You can never have too many elephants on your team."

  45. White noise by rackrent · · Score: 1

    I would have to agree with other posters who've noted the white noise benefits that the fans provide. I have the biggest, baddest office in the building, but it's located directly over the heat exchangers in the building. As a result, I have nice, smooth, background noise, which helps to drown out external noise, which provides a strong sense of privacy for me.

    What I don't like is when my laptop fan keeps going on and off; that interrupts the stream of my little white noise festival.

    Actually, I sleep with a regular box fan running all night, too. I suppose if you work around computers all the time, you become adjusted to the noise and find total silence somewhat eerie.

    --
    --- There is a man in a smiling bag.
  46. Flents disposable ear plugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Flents makes a disposable ear plug. You can get a pack for about 5 bucks. To work best you really have to stuff them back into your ear. You will find a "sweet spot" in your ear canal where they really really block out everything. I mean dead silence. I've used these when I've had to sleep during the day. Combined with a real dark room, you will sleep very deeply. Some of the best sleep I've ever had can be attributed to Flents disposable ear plugs.

  47. Noise by flikx · · Score: 1

    Big deal, noise doesn't bother me. It's the heat that causes a problem.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then get yo' ass an air conditoner.

  48. Use in a car? by Traicovn · · Score: 2

    You mention that they are being tested in a car. Personally my car runs rather quietly, so it's not a problem. Sure, it would be nice to have it even quieter, but it occured to me that it might be quite a frequency range someone would want to block out (wind through cracks, outside noise, etc.) I would find it very odd for people who are screaming about the use of cellphones in cars to support something that can block noise and lower a drivers alertness to that enviroment around him. IT's a nice idea, perhaps it would be a good idea in a bus or something like that. I know that it's designed for 'just certain frequencies' but one has to wonder if it couldn't malfunction, or somehow something else could be in a close enough frequency range that it would get blocked too by accident? Still a nice idea though...

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
    1. Re:Use in a car? by oldsk8r · · Score: 1

      Lotus Cars (UK) used this system in the Esprit Turbo over 10 years ago. It cancelled out the engine noise, and in a 2.2 litre fiberglass car that can do 172mph you get a lot of noise.

  49. Noise cancellation is a simple thing by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    The noise cancellation used in those headphones and such is actually quite simple. All you need is a well placed microphone and a phase-shift network and/or inverting amplifier. I remember seeing things like this shown on TLC or discovery or something and they (as usual) acted like it was some super amazing feat of science. All you need to build it is a set of headphones, 2 mics (1 for each ear), and about $2 worth of components.

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    1. Re:Noise cancellation is a simple thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think this is a simple technology? Read these two tutorials for a very basic intro.

    2. Re:Noise cancellation is a simple thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes thats gonna work wonderfully, pity about the amplified feedback loop giving you a very nasty surprise when you turn it on.

    3. Re:Noise cancellation is a simple thing by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      Never mind that there are at least 3 of these things commercially avialable RIGHT NOW. They work amazingly great. Course you can't hear your boss yelling for you or the phone ringing so maybe not so great for maintaining your job...

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  50. That's not why its expensive... by rebelcool · · Score: 2
    its expensive because it uses advanced waveform processing in deciding what to cancel out and what not to.

    For example, cancel out your neighbor's bass, but not the conversation you're having with someone in the same room.

    --

    -

    1. Re:That's not why its expensive... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Besides the waveform analysis, you have to have pretty good sound reproduction to swing this. Which means your own set of good speakers. :-)

  51. Car noise-cancelling by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember seeing a long time ago on the TV a system similar fitted to an exhaust on a pokey 4 cylinder Audi. The car was practically silent, and people had a lot of trouble stalling the car when pulling away from a standstill, because you had no real feedback on engine RPM.

    Best bit was that after the car was 'silent', they simply put some nice beefy speakers in the car, linked it to engine RPM and load, and added a bit of computer wizardy. Suddenly the Audi sounded a whole lot more like a Ferrari, or at the flick of a switch , a F1 car (with 12,000 rpm 'wired' to about 4500 real engine rpm), they even had (heh) a jet turbine, but it was a bit crappy, cause turbines don't quite spool up like 4 cylinder cars do :-)

    The presenter was having a ball, caning this little car around town - from the camera's position in the car it was pretty realistic.

    Pretty much the 'killer app' for noise-cancelling tech in my opinion.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  52. Arthur C. Clarke Short Story by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

    Anyone else read the Clarke short story (can't remember the name for the life of me) where someone did this?

    Unfortunatly, he didn't *cancle* the noise so much as store it in the baterty of the device. (The story was a bit short on the technical details, I admit....) This resulted in a rather large explosion, following a humorous scene where a horrible and mean opera singer was silenced with rightous justice.

    Very humorous.

    My concern: will my computer explode if I use this device? I mean, Clarke did predict a host of other high-tech gadgets now in use!! How do we know this isn't another one? I'm just worried that - *BOOOM* ---My computer has exploded.

    -Trillian

    1. Re:Arthur C. Clarke Short Story by Quaryon · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was just about to make the same post - the story comes from "Tales From The White Hart" - one of Clarke's better collections with humorous short stories..

      I can't remember the name of the story either but I do remember the machine exploding at the end :)

      Q.

    2. Re:Arthur C. Clarke Short Story by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1

      I remember this one too from Tales of the White Hart. The thing is that in the case of the original story, the energy didn't dissipate and became some kind of horrendous standing wave. In the case of the idea discussed here, the energy dissipates away from the listener. That is, the listener receives noise and anti-noise but specifically delivered at one place, outside that place, you may get both types of noise added together rather than canceling out. As the anti-noise is typically low volume, this doesn't matter so much.

  53. Poor man's bitchslap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    [Note: I fully expect to be modded to -1 for this but as I am an arrogant 50 karma poster I will just laugh it off.]

    Be wary of the "poor man's bitchslap". Moderators don't like to be taunted (or rather, they really like it, but also like to react...), and so they will just track down every single of your post, and mod each one down one point. That way, it'll take only ten of them (rather than fifty) to reduce your karma to a steaming pile of shit.

    Oh, and metamod won't avenge you either, if the moderators are smart enough to use Overrated rather than Troll or Flamebait.

    1. Re:Poor man's bitchslap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Be wary of the "poor man's bitchslap". Moderators don't like to be taunted (or rather, they really like it, but also like to react...), and so they will just track down every single of your post [slashdot.org], and mod each one down one point."

      This is the 3rd offtopic I am doing so I will post as AC to keep the score below 1 ... yes I will beware of it ... I will post something intelligent tomorrow and get back karma. Only a small amount of whoring and many intelligent posts got me to 50 to begin with.

  54. Hmmmm by gvonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would imagine that you hold down a button and all of the sound it hears during that time it works to cancel out but then if you talk it knows that's not what you wanted to cancel out... like synchronizing a wireless mouse with the base station by holding the down a button to get it in sync...

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  55. Mac OS X Users: An Easy Solution by cjsnell · · Score: 4, Informative


    Give Noise a try. It's free and it works pretty well for me.

    A little tip: I think you'll find that pink noise works best if it's being generated from a source that sits between you and the noise you're trying to block out.

    Another tip: pink noise are also good at keeping your noise masked. If you want to have a conversation with your girlfriend and don't want your roommate listening in, turn on some pink noise.

    1. Re:Mac OS X Users: An Easy Solution by ainsoph · · Score: 2

      is there anything like that for linux? My ears are killing me.

    2. Re:Mac OS X Users: An Easy Solution by MrEnigma · · Score: 0

      We need a Java one :). I suppose this means you need to have a decent microphone, and have to setup all that also...oh well.

      --
      GeekWares - Buy and Download Today!
    3. Re:Mac OS X Users: An Easy Solution by RFC959 · · Score: 1

      To make white/pink noise?
      cat /dev/urandom > /dev/dsp
      I don't know how statistically good it is, but it's easy to do. Personally, I think anybody who says that that helps block out noise is nuts, but to each his own.

    4. Re:Mac OS X Users: An Easy Solution by ainsoph · · Score: 2

      me too.. that did not work :)

  56. Possible hearing problems? by Tristessa · · Score: 1

    One thing that I am unsure about is whether or not the sound waves actually make it to your ears but we just don't hear them anymore (if that makes sense).

    That is if a person stood behind an anti-noise device (in the quiet zone), would it still be possible for them to have hearing problems from the volume of air moving in and out of the ears? Or do the sound waves never get past the anti-noise waves?

    1. Re:Possible hearing problems? by recursiv · · Score: 1
      One thing that I am unsure about is whether or not the sound waves actually make it to your ears but we just don't hear them anymore (if that makes sense).


      No that does not make sense. I have a feeling you don't know what you're talking about. Once the sound reaches your ear, you hear it. (assuming it's in the audible range, etc etc etc)

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
  57. If only they invented this two years ago. by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 1

    In wich case I might still be married.

    --
    >
    1. Re:If only they invented this two years ago. by jcoy42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was thinking that being married would solve the problem- everyone I know who's been married for more than 5 years has developed the ability to turn off thier hearing at will (well, at least the males).

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
  58. The possibilities are endless by Binarybrain · · Score: 1

    Honey..I care, I do.. tell me how your day was...

    wait, let me just turn this on. Ok..

    go ahead and talk now. :-)

  59. There was a fictional story in which someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    used something like this at a politician's speech

  60. But does it work on loud coworkers? by Observer · · Score: 1

    Alas, probably not. We'll have to stick with the traditional solutions.

  61. It already works that way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern artillery already uses anti-sound generators (basically *really* powerful speakers placed in front of the cannon) to dampen the sound of the cannon firing. Works fine.

  62. wouldn't be able to sleep without the hummmmmmmmm by amtron · · Score: 1

    It feels as if I am so used to the machines (5 or 6 on any given day) that if I were to quiet them down, I would feel like I was missing somthing.

    I guess you get used to what you have to live with.

    --
    amtron amtronx@yahoo.com
  63. Why only Apple ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Apple can make a silent machine, why can't other manufacturers?

    Because other manufacturers are not using PowerPC CPUs. One of the PowerPC's advantages over Intel/AMD is power consumption / heat generation.

    Another factor is that Apple has absolute control over the interior of those silent Macs (later model iMacs and Cubes). The location of heat sources, careful selection of components to meet design parameters, unobstructed cool air intake, unobstructed convection paths to remove hot air, and most important of all: they don't let the end user screw around with it (adding RAM is about it).

    Life is much simpler when you don't let the average clone shop "technicians" or do-it-yourself'ers pick a bad case and powersupply, block a hot component's airflow with a rats nest of cables and crap, and try to compensate for their poor work by adding a few more fans.

    As for Apple's tower configurations that more closely resemble PC's, they are very noisy.

    1. Re:Why only Apple ... by SerpentMage · · Score: 2

      And PowerPC CPU's are consistently slower than any of my Intel boxes. I use LINUX on both PowerPC and Intel. My Intel boxs run circles around the PowerPC.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  64. hummmmm? by limxdul · · Score: 1

    Yes, i totally agree with that... even though one downside is dust building up on your devices and boxes ;)

  65. Software-based solutions? by NawBawl · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm surprised there's no (insert Dr Evil) "Open Source" software solution for realtime noise cancellation. I wouldnt mind a daemon constantly feeding my stereo the inverted-phase sound of my rooms ambient noise.

    Here's a challenge, implement it in one line of Perl :)
    Record -> invert -> playback
    mmmmm,
    for() { read("/dev/mic", buf); buf = buf * (-1); write("/dev/dsp", bug);} //whatever

    Yes, I have google'd & freshmeat'ed...

    1. Re:Software-based solutions? by NawBawl · · Score: 1
      for() { read("/dev/mic", buf); buf = buf * (-1); write("/dev/dsp", bug);} //whatever

      hahah, no pun intended s/bug/buf/

    2. Re:Software-based solutions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the idea is ok, but it is not that simple. first of all, the mic will also pick up the sound of the speaker. second, the buffering and the soundcard will introduce some delay, which could make the sound even louder! (imagine you try to cancel out a sinusoid with a negative sinusoid, but the delay makes it 180 deg out of phase!)

  66. Invisibility machine by SpaceTux · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I wonder when this trick will be possible with light rays instead of audio waves :)

  67. ANR headsets in aircraft by AlexOsadzinski · · Score: 3, Informative

    This (noise-cancelling) technology transformed flying in general aviation aircraft a few years ago. An unpressurized single-engine aircraft can be very noisy, with a big fan a few feet in front of the pilot's face pulling the 'plane along. Sound insulation material is heavy, which you don't want in today's load-challenged GA aircraft. I use cheap ($300) automatic noise reduction (ANR) headsets when flying, and the difference is amazing when you turn them on. This technology works much better at low frequencies than high, and the tiring low-frequency rumble of a big piston engine just goes away.

  68. Too late for me. by crankyinmv · · Score: 1

    Dear God I could have used something like this in college. I could have studied and/or slept. I suppose a shotgun would have worked too, but I didn't want to spend all my money on ammo.

    --

    ---
    For your protection, a copy of this message is being sent via RFC 1149.
  69. Panic Room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather have a panic room, how do I make one of those?

  70. Prevention is better than cure. by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I recall correctly, ANR involves adding sound waves together to cancel each other out (as the waves are out of phase by half). This can't be a perfect implementation as there are many frequencies of sounds that are emitted from a computer at different times.

    Would it not be better for case manufacturers to manufacutre boxes that are sealed (sound proof). No air vents. Plus a tiny air compressor (air conditioning) inside that keeps the temperature, humidity at desireable levels. It would also remove what little dust is present too.

    Current levels of technology could implement this easily and cheapily. Prevention is better than cure. This is a simple solution, not a bandage fix.

    "I would like to change the world, but Microsoft will never give away any source code!"

    1. Re:Prevention is better than cure. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      I'm curious where all the air from the air compressor goes? Seems like it would create a lot of pressure on the box. You'd also need some hefty insulation, which would make the temperature problem even worse.

      If you want a quiet computer, try an iMac. No fan = little noise. You hear the hard drive and cd drive occasionally but that's it.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Prevention is better than cure. by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 1

      The air from the air compressor takes air from inside the case, compresses it, then releases it quickly back into the case... a closed system. This is how a car air conditioner works when the knob is not switched to intake fresh air.

      The air pressure inside the box would remain constant, maybe even at 1 ATM (atmosphere... 101.325 kPa). Minimal insulation would be required to stop noise getting out, or heat transfer into the box.

      I will never buy an iMac (or any other Mac for that reason). I can get a much faster machine, compatible with more types of software (linux, windows), that is more upgradeable for a much cheaper price. So what if the case isn't colourful. hehe.

  71. Similar technology: The Silent Zone (plug) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I work for a company, Silence International, that is developing a similar technology, called the "Silent Zone". It cancels random low-frequency noise. A version aimed at engineers driving diesel locomotives is planned to go into production this autumn.
    More information can be found here: http://www.silence.no"

  72. School by __aawavt7683 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if schools would take up this technology. I'm sure we've all had the loud classrooms, from constant heaters in the hallway and other ventilation, and who knows what else. Such noises often drive me crazy. I'd love schools to add this about 5 years ago :-)

    -DrkShadow
    Senior, graduating in June.

  73. Speaking of sleep... by eracerblue · · Score: 1

    now wives around the world can "cancel out" the snoring of their hubby.

    maa.... do i have the coolest gadget for you!

    really cool thought:
    a minature hearing aid type device, which you can selectively "lock on" voices you want, and cancel out everything else, including other voices.

    awe yeah... wicked. just think, you could be at a deafening rock concert. first, you could "attenuate" the sound to a tollerable level. then, when your buddy a 100 feet a way shouts out to you, it can mute the concert, and let you hear only them. wicked!

    zaoink! - pinky & the brain brain brain brain brain

    1. Re:Speaking of sleep... by softsign · · Score: 2
      You know, most hearing aid companies are working on stuff like this. Hearing impaired have a hell of a time at something like a cocktail party - where there's lots of noise from all different directions (it's actually called the cocktail party problem). Since most hearing aids consist of a single microphone (not communicating with the other side of your head), you lose your natural ability to determine the direction a voice is coming from (your brain is actually able to tune out background noise because your ears can tell you which direction a sound came from). So some next-gen hearing aids consist of two mics and some DSP to tune out all but sound coming from your forward "field of view". I've seen (heard) it demonstrated, it's pretty wild.

      Unfortunately, you don't always want to tune out 360 degrees of hearing... so there's some adjustment of the hearing aids required when you move into a different setting.

    2. Re:Speaking of sleep... by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      I dont' see how selective devices are dificult.. just hook it up to a boom mic :)

      --
      hmm sooner
    3. Re:Speaking of sleep... by Thorson · · Score: 1

      A good friend of mine is an audiologist, and getting quite deaf. He has those state of the art hearing aids. His have three settings for the filters. Each one has a different set of audio ranges being filtered. It was quite interesting when he first got them. We'd be sitting talking, outside at a sidewalk cafe, and he'd stop, and change the setting. Seems that talking outside has different filter requirements than inside.

      The thing that amazes me about these new aids is how small they are. Unless you look very cafefully, and notice the tiny little posts sticking out of his ears, the aids are undetectable.

      He was one of the founders of a hearing aid company that first brought out aids with audio filters.

      Peace
      Msarty

    4. Re:Speaking of sleep... by eracerblue · · Score: 1

      cocktail party: a la cdma spread spectrum communications? unless you've got the correct despreading sequence, and are syncronized, it's all just noise. hmmm... interesting. i wonder if it would be possible to identify a "spreading sequence" of someone's voice.

      fun fun.

    5. Re:Speaking of sleep... by softsign · · Score: 2

      With CDMA, you have no directional information... Your single antenna isn't capable of isolating the source of a signal. It's all a mishmash. That's why you need PN codes.

      At a cocktail party, it's a different kind of mishmash. Suppose you are standing at the centre of multiple sound sources. Person B, standing at your 4 o'clock, speaks. That sound will arrive at your right ear moments before it arrives at your left ear. Furthermore, you have other cues to indicate that the sound is coming from behind you (not sure if this is your ears or just being able to feel the vibrations in your jaw or body). Your brain basically triangulates on the source. What's more amazing is that your brain can do this for multiple simultaneous sources to the point where you can pick out a single conversation in a crowded room.

      I think the whole voice identification thing is another neat brain trick - not too familiar with that...

    6. Re:Speaking of sleep... by eracerblue · · Score: 1

      heh. :) 3 thoughts:

      1) voice id: all i know is that my random signals prof was always excited about voce applications of the autocorrelation. etc etc.

      2) moderation: are you modding your own posts up to 2?? :)

      3) ucalgary: i actually almost went there for my undergrad. was admitted, had my rez room and everything, but got accepted elsewhere at the last minute. how you liking it there? (i noticed your doing your masters there.) and what are you intending to do when you finish off?

    7. Re:Speaking of sleep... by softsign · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's all the statistics you can use... although I'm not sure if that's what the brain does precisely. It does work pretty well for machines though. There's a whole industry - biometrics - being built around that kind of stuff.

      I'm not self-moderating... it's the karma +1 bonus. I only disable it when I post off-topic or useless posts. Just whore yourself enough to the moderators, and eventually your thoughts will be considered more important than average too! =) (I think the threshold is +25 karma or something like)

      Re: ucalgary. Where did you wind up going? Personally, I'm glad I went to a smaller school for my undergrad. Got to know my profs really well, made some life-long friends and had a great four years. My graduating class in EE seemed like a great big family. Everyone knew everyone else. I don't think that exists here. It's a shame really.

  74. Atlas 10k III Ultra160 hard drive is quiet by goingware · · Score: 2
    I had heard that 10,000 RPM drives were really noisy so I was anxious about ever using one since my office is already very noisy (4 computers).

    But I wanted good performance for a machine I was converting to a dedicated fileserver for my home office (finally a machine I could leave running Linux all the time, without having to reboot, running Samba, Netatalk and NFS for all my machines). So I decided to try the Atlas 10k III.

    The one I ordered was a Quantum, but I guess they got bought out by Maxtor, or something, anyway Quantum is still around but only sells tape drives now.

    I read somewhere that the 10k III's were quieter than previous 10,000 RPM drives so I was pretty hopeful.

    My first drive didn't work. I tried it at first in my mac on an adaptec 29160, but the 29160 didn't detect it. I thought it wasn't spinning up because I couldn't hear it.

    Maxtor sent me an advance RMA (secured by a credit card) and I got the new drive today. I have 30 days to return the broken drive or else they'll charge my card.

    The web page above says they are Ultra320 but the drive I have is labeled Ultra160. No matter, really, I don't think one drive can sustain a 320 MB/sec transfer rate - these high transfer rates are most useful for RAIDs.

    I was distressed when I put the new drive in my PC on an adaptec 39160, because I couldn't hear it at all! There is another drive in the box, an old 2 GB IDE drive with Windows 2000, and the old drive completely covers up any sound coming out of the 10kIII.

    I was really upset until I went into the Adaptec SCSI utility to test and format the drive, which checked out fine.

    I'm really impressed. My wife wants me to get these for all our machines.

    I'm installing just the bare essentials of Debian potato on it as I write these, and then I'm going to use debian's go-woody script to update it to woody.

    Enterprise server admins might be skeptical of running beta software on a fileserver, but I've been running unstable (sid) on my Mac for months with few problems. My only concern is which kernel is the best, I want to run a 2.4 kernel on it and I'm not sure which I should use.

    --
    -- Could you use my software consulting serv
    1. Re:Atlas 10k III Ultra160 hard drive is quiet by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      The web page above says they are Ultra320 but the drive I have is labeled Ultra160. No matter, really, I don't think one drive can sustain a 320 MB/sec transfer rate -

      If you are using a 32 bit PCI bus, it will saturate well below 160MB/sec. It's all pretty much a waste of money except for certain applications, especially when I can max out the PCI bus with IDE drives.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  75. we drummers... by ebmedia · · Score: 1

    This would be great, if it were affordable.. I could pass one out to every person in my neighborhood, hey! no more bitching!

  76. Audio recording/restoration applications? by jcsehak · · Score: 2


    This would be great for recording audio direct into the computer, if you could cancel out the fan noise but still keep the full frequency range of what you're recording. Sounds unlikely though. It'd mean I can take my machine out of the closet though!

    Hmm, now that I think of it, anyone have any ideas about a way to temorarily shut off the fan? I've got a Mac G4 tower. Maybe there's a way to get to it software wise, but I'd guess I'd probably have to wind up doing a hardware mod--make a switch to turn on/off the power to the fan (this would be so I could shut off the fan, record a few minutes of audio, then turn it back on). Or is it a bad idea to shut off the fan for even a few minutes?

    I'd just about go into conniptions if this techology could be used to restore old blues recordings and get rid of the scratchiness. Some have so much scratch and hiss they're almost unlistenable, like some Skip James or Blind Lemon Jefferson tracks. You have to really listen to hear the nuances of what they're playing. But if they could take out the scratches and leave all the sound... Oooh, baby.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  77. Low budget bass removal by dattaway · · Score: 5, Funny

    Eliminating bass can be much simpler than that with just an amplifier, speakers, and a... signal generator: position the speakers against the dorm wall where the source originates. Set the amplifier for test purposes at medium volume. Slowly calibrate the signal generator to achieve resonance of the walls. This is determined when picture frames rattle off the walls. Once this point is determined, maximize amplifier output. The resonant energy building within the walls will then be transparently delivered to the client in what can be described as a non-maskable interrupt.

    What can be described after that is guaranteed to be silence. Except for breakage of items in the host's bookshelves, etc... Slight profanity may be also side effect. Use with caution and deny any knowledge when questioned.

    1. Re:Low budget bass removal by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "deny any knowledge when questioned."

      Yah right, you'd be the only neighbor with a big ass bass speaker, megawatt amp, and a signal generator. No one would suspect a thing!

      Easier solution, find circuit breaker (not obvious but frequently insecure), trip switch, repeat as necessary. People will assume it is the idiot's overpowered stereo that keeps tripping the breaker.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Low budget bass removal by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      I just thought of the posible party implications.... awsome..... that would mean throwing parties .. well anywhere without sound detection keuwwel!!!!!!

      --
      hmm sooner
  78. Really cool. by burtonator · · Score: 2

    This is really nice. I have actually been thinking a LOT about this recently.

    In the past my 'server' has just been a Micron PC with SCSI and 512M... The nice thing about this has been that it is cheap and quiet.

    I can always hear it in the background but it does put me to sleep and the white noise keeps the sound of the busy SF streets from waking me up.

    The problem is that chicks don't dig it. When I have a girl spend the night they always complain that they can't sleep. If they are REALLY hot sometimes I will just shutoff the machine :)

    Then I got a *really* good deal on a 5U server. The only problem is that it is LOUD AS HELL! Then I had to swap my room/office situation around.

    This made me think... I think the white noise is TOTALLY not worth it. I have started to notice s slight ringing in my ears when I am in total silence. I am just concerned that it might be this constant white noise causing the problem.

    So I might buy this thing... see if it improves the situation..

    knock on wood

  79. shotgun by joss · · Score: 2

    I find a shotgun quietens the neighbours dogs better than anything.

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  80. Re:Car noise-cancelling by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

    I read a similar story, where a company applied this to a vacuum cleaner - every time it sucked up something that made a noise, the vacuum cleaner enhanced that sound, so that it sounded like you were sucking up a bowl of macaronis or something... It made the cleaner think "wow, this is really efficient - it's much more fun to clean the house when you can really hear that it is getting cleaner".

  81. Human sounds cancelation by Semi_War · · Score: 1

    Hmmm this thing also work on a noisy mother in law?

  82. Does it work on people? by terry217 · · Score: 1

    The only unwanted noise in my office is the incessant babble from my cow-orkers.

    No, hang on a minute. Cancelling out people? I should be on alt.mafia.requests

  83. Missing the Point 101 by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

    You're missing the point. Yes, we know how to cancel noise. As you say, a noisy crowd will still be noisy.

    The point is using the knowledge that we gained 30 years ago to finally *make something useful*.

    Vaporware condensed, as it were.

    We have a clue about genetically altering pigs to create human compatible hearts, too. Does that mean that since we thought of it 5 years ago, we shouldn't explore the possibilities of such treatment?

  84. Old News by lxmeister · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm sure this was on Tomorrows World in the UK years ago.

  85. I need noise! by Eil · · Score: 4, Funny


    Does anyone ever consider that I might *want* noise? The dorms I live in are so damn loud that I'll do anything to bring the ambient noise above the human- and stereo-created noise threshold.

    Right now I've got a non-functional AC unit and dual in-window fans going primarily for this purpose alone. The frige is right next to my bed and since I don't have any money for food, I sometimes leave the door propped open just so the compressor runs and lulls me to sleep. I'm also considering buying a monster box fan to put next to my bed so my frige doesn't have to work so hard. (Or if I actually want to put anything in it.)

    And don't get me started on my computer. I think my neighbor can tell when I shut this thing off.

    For the curious, I have tried those anti-noise machines and noise-cancelling headphones, but they don't take care of 99% of the problem for me: bass. Until I started working nights, I'd usually be up until the wee hours of the morning because some dipshit wants to have a Jurassic Park marathon with his dipshit buddies. Let me tell you how fun that is when I had to get up a 6AM for work every day.

    And yes, I have also tried earplugs, but again, they don't block out the bass... the sound has such a low frequency that it travels through your skull rather than through your ear canal.

    1. Re:I need noise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy solution. Find out what weapons are legal to have in your dorm. Guns are certain to be right out, as are most 'real' bladed weapons like swords, axes and knives meant for business. Usually, they won't harass you about steak knives. And for the most part, you can carry a mace around with wild abandon.

      No, keep reading - the idea isn't to beat your fellow residents to death. As appealing as that sounds, it usually results in some manner of legal trouble.

      What you do next is entertaining. Buy, rent, borrow, etc.. Some big ass speakers.

      They start up a Jurrasic Park marathon (Gods below, my freshman year, every other night, the hosers across from my room would blast Saving Private Ryan. EVERY OTHER @%(*@$(* NIGHT!)..

      Erm, anyway, what do you do?

      Two words - Village People.

      This is where a mace is optimal. Make sure you have a flanged one, and not one of those not-too-realistic ones with sharp six inch points. You smack the mace's head into the palm of your hand to hold off the angry mob, while noting that you'll stop making everyone's gaydar go crazy when they stop blasting the worst movie ever.

    2. Re:I need noise! by pangur · · Score: 3, Funny
      For the curious, I have tried those anti-noise machines and noise-cancelling headphones, but they don't take care of 99% of the problem for me: bass

      Yeah, the guy in the next cubicle has the "Billy the Big-Mouthed Bass". He has it on motion-detection, and nothing is more annoying that a fish that jumps out and sings when I go to the bathroom.

    3. Re:I need noise! by giblfiz · · Score: 1

      The frige is right next to my bed and since I don't have any money for food, I sometimes leave the door propped open just so the compressor runs and lulls me to sleep.

      you should think about a sterio. I hear they use less power

    4. Re:I need noise! by Eil · · Score: 2


      Yes, but a) I'm not paying for the power (and it's not my fridge :P) b) I need ambient noise. Any human-generated noise such as talking, music, TV, or bass is what keeps me awake.

  86. Possibly not all good by dunkerz · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that when a lot of dust clogs in the CPU fan, it makes a really loud, painful noise. You can tell that it's upset. Making a device that blocks out such sound could lead to the user being oblivious to the problem, leading to damage of your boxen. And what if you've just done something inside the box and a cable is brushing against a fan? You wouldn't hear it and the result could be having to buy a new cable (for the sake of example). All boils down to mon£y, as usual :)

    On the other hand, it's a great idea! :)

    --

    You were expecting a sig?
    1. Re:Possibly not all good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, when I notice a variance in the phase descrepency of the anti-matter invertors..

      Erm, I mean, when I notice my fans making odd noises, the first thing that happens is a panel is yanked off and out comes the flashlight for a dust inspection.

      Dust is a bad thing(tm), and tends to collect with wild abandon in all but the most sterile of environments. One of my classmates just had a problem with his CPU fan, on an AMD K6 processor. It was overheating because of the built up grime causing the fan to operate at.. well, not quite peak efficiency. The resulting heat caused all manner of operating difficulties. He cleaned the gunk off, and the box returned to normal operation. However, as I'm sure everyone can figure out, leaving a processor in a state of overheating, especially modern processors, is Not Good(tm).

      There's something, I wonder how many MS crashes are caused by grimy fans? Hmm. Not too many I'd guess. ;)

  87. Won't work. by Domini · · Score: 2

    You will only have small quiet areas unless you purchase many of these sound-damping speakers.

    NOT an alternative for just booting that AMD and getting a Pentium...

    Me.

  88. noise.. options? by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    it's either that or having to listen to my neighbours having sex every sunday morning....

  89. Cancelling out speech by DullTrev · · Score: 1

    Everyone goes quiet when I walk into a room already, why would I need one of these?

    --
    Trev - used to be interesting. Honest.
  90. Active Noise Reduction by malen · · Score: 1

    A couple years ago I did some research on active noise reduction (using destructive interference to cancel out noise). My aim was to build a prototype noise reduction system for air ducts.

    I found that I could get upwards of 85% attenuation simply from signal inversion (as opposed to realtime fast Fourier transform computations), mostly around 300 Hz or so.

    However, this technology definitely does not work well for much higher frequencies, since as frequency increases the wavelength decreases, making it more difficult to keep the inverted waveform in phase with the noise. Also, there are many difficulties with feedback, since the sampling microphone mustn't inadvertently amplify the cancelling signal.

    In my research, the duct I was experimenting on approximated a purely 1-dimensional waveguide system; in a 3-dimensional space (a NOC filled with deafeningly l33t boxen, for instance), the acoustic characteristics of the environment are generally much too complex to compute for noise reduction for more than a very small region. That's why this technology is most applicable in headphones, car cabins, etc, since their acoustic characteristics are well documented and relatively static.

    The point of all my rambling here is to show that this technology is by no means easy to implement! It still has a way to go before it becomes a truly mature technology, in my opinion.

  91. How did the succed patenting this? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    I have seen this tecnology around in magazines for ages and there are lotsa gadgets using this since long time back. The concept of canceling sounds out with out of phase soundwaves is old as the amp. Balanced cables used in concerts and studios use this technology. The biggest problem has been when the room is too big and reflecting soundwaves start to echo out of phase with the noise and in phase with the noise killer. (big noise if you stand far away from the noise killer)

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  92. Relationship Aid by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

    It sounds like someone should start a service to match this machine to the pitch of your girlfriend's or boyfriend's voice. The benefits for relationships are enormous...

  93. Says the inventor... by UncleAlias · · Score: 1

    "It would seem far easier and more sensible to avoid making noise in the first place."

    Am I the only one paranoid enough to see a future where no one will bother to sound-proof anything because these little buggers will be mass-produced and cheap enough (at least for those who can afford it, of course)?

    The rich can currently afford non-polluted water, bio-produced food, clean air -- and now silent environment? Welcome to the third millennium...

    Okay, I am probably the only one paranoid enough...

    --

    Stéphane "Alias" Gallay
    Now, where did I put this witty quote?..

  94. nothing new by NTSwerver · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new. I remember seeing a documentary (years ago - can't remember name) where this sort of technology was demonstrated inside cars to cut out engine noise.

    It sounds like this machine will also only work on repetetive noise as opposed to it being 'intelligent'. I would be impressed if this machine could cut out random noises (dogs barking, etc) in realtime.

    --
    -----------------------
    Moderator's essentials
  95. silence machine by theLunchLady · · Score: 1

    You think this will work on my girlfriend?

  96. Sorry, this is really old news. by @madeus · · Score: 1

    Wow, this is -really- old news, though I know a lot of /. stuff is old these days, I'm surprised that no one has heard of this before...

    Personally I first saw this on "Tomorrows World" (a BBC Science and New Technology television program) - about 10 years ago .

    They even demoed the system in a car, and let you hear the difference.

  97. Old News by silvaran · · Score: 1

    This has been around for quite some time. I remember being 14 (7 years ago) and seeing a documentary on TV about cars in England with this technology. There was a microphone in the cab of the car, as well as numerous speakers. The microphone would pick up the noise from the engine and the wind rushing past the car, the computer chip would invert it and play it back; the result? A perfectly quiet ride. Additionally, it featured a control panel that simulated noises of different cars. You could make it sound like an F1 racer, or a Nascar engine, etc. The car wasn't terribly attractive though (but the female showcasing it was :).

  98. Re:Car noise-cancelling by twinpot · · Score: 1

    Lotus (the UK car maker) has been trialling this for while. They had a unit rigged up to a little Citroen AX. When in quiet mode, it was driven gently, when in 12 cylinder mode, drivers thrashed it mercilessly.

    They are considering it for a diesel sports car they are looking to build.

  99. Noisy environments by KatieL · · Score: 1

    I have to say, although I can just about hear humming sounds from here (I think it's the colour printer behind me), FAR more noise comes from the phones.

    The unattended mobiles are annoying, the monotonous, almost continuous ringing of external calls arriving to whole ring groups is annoying, but far, far and away is the noise made by a phone on ringback. It's this shrill ring-ring-ring-ring-ring sound that makes it really clear that whatever needed ringing back is MUCH more important than the work of the nearest dozen people.

    I kind of wish it was quiet enough to hear the machines humming... then I could think straight.

  100. In Cars by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    These are also being tested in cars, to make the car quieter.

    Because you wouldn't want to hear pesky things like sirens when you are driving...

  101. You can't remove all the noise by thogard · · Score: 2

    I've got a sony headphones. I picked them up for about US$100 at the airport in Narita (Tokyo). In the airplane, they allow you to hear the movie at the lowest setting. In a quiet room they produce a constant buzz. The $1500 Bose aviation headsets also do the same thing but they have nice ear cups that help knock off about 30 db.

  102. Random Noise Stuff by cybergibbons · · Score: 2

    This doesn't have much point really, but the kind of noises that piss people off are completely different.

    I have two computers on in my room, neither of which are quiet. I can tell which HDs out of the 4 are on, and if any of the CPU fans break. I sleep through this all fine unless some heavy disk access happens, or I hear one of the fans go off. However, if I leave the amp up high, and the speakers hiss even slightly, I can't sleep. My girlfriend also isn't too impressed with the level of noise.

    However, at hers, she only has a little laptop. I can't sleep with the high pitch hiss/whine that the HD makes, or the horrible forced air noise the tiny fan makes - and it isn't that I'm not used to it.

    Whenever we do crew things for shows, and I need to sleep during the performance so I can work afterwards, I find sleeping behind the speaker stacks is a great place... the treble is cut because it is more directional, but the base stays, and it's quite relaxing. I can even fall asleep in clubs, base is kind of relaxing. It is a different sort of sleep from usual - very hard to wake up, and you get very vivid dreams.

    So, you'd think I was fine with noise. But I can't stand working in co-lo facilities. It's not so bad in a cluster room, or somewhere all the computers are the same... but when you have 300 machines each with two fans, HD arrays, loads of raqs, then all the different noises combine, and working in there on anything more complex than running cables is impossible. I was working on a few servers for about 12 hours one day, and had a huge supply of Dr Peppers, so hadn't moved much... when I got up to leave I felt so dizzy, and I think it was a result of the noise. I tripped over a bit of cat 5 and took out a server as well...

  103. Woo-hoo! by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has ever pointed a remote control at someone and pressed 'mute' will be really happy about this!

  104. Energy conversation by anshil · · Score: 2

    What about energy conversation?

    As far I've learned wave canceling does not work globally by physics. If you have 2 waves, they may cancel each other out on some places, but double up on other places.

    If both waves would cancel each other of completely, where did their energy go???????

    --

    --
    Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    1. Re:Energy conversation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the energy went into creating the noise (motion), part of the energy went into cancelling the noise (reaction force to prevent motion). Where is the problem?

  105. Car Prototype by codework · · Score: 1

    I used to work at a Car manufacturer a few years ago where we were testing a similar device in a prototype vehicle.
    It's a good technology, but the overall conclusion was that it would be nice to have conversation with a passenger without some pesky bit of kit taking the words from your mouth.
    The project was later canned.
    /j

  106. Complex computer... by Bnonn · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Disclaimer: ianal, but there may be a really obvious reason why this is a dumb question.

    The article states that to dampen complex noise like speech in realtime, a powerful computer must be used. I'm wondering why. If you have the speech going into the system to be cancelled, isn't there a more simple way to sample the amplitude and just amplify that sound to the right level and pump it through some kind of inversion circuit and out the speakers?

    I dunno, maybe an "inversion circuit" isn't possible, but you've already got that sound to work with; all you have to do is put it 180 out of phase. It seems like that should be fairly simple. Kind of a shame to complicate such an elegant idea with anything more than basic computer-aided sampling. Maybe I'm underestimating the difficulty though.

  107. The Fenton Silencer by wiredog · · Score: 2

    by Arthur C Clarke, in the collection "Tales From The White Hart" is exactly this scenario. Poor Fenton, blows up the concert hall. With him in it...

  108. Hey you, x86 zealot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't make me beat you over the head with useless Photoshop benchmarks :)

  109. Does it wwork citywide? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

    If so, please test in Washington D.C.

  110. Insane White noise by Shadow51 · · Score: 1

    I have an old IBM mainframe in my room sounds like a turbo jet engine starting up. And the Xeon's dont help cause i have 19" rackmount fans... Im used to the noise but im unable to talk on the phone... And I find the noise rather loud... Anyone have a suggestion for any perticular device ?
    because I have no idea where to get these so called noise reduction devices...

  111. A much better solution by HEbGb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Especially for air travelers - Sony makes some earbud noice cancelling headphones, the NC10. Their performance is much better than Bose's, and since they're so tiny, you can just slip them into you shirt pocket, rather than having to lug a huge package around with you (the Bose ones are HUGE).

    And, as I recall, Bose headphones have a pretty severe feedback problem. If you cover the port (say, by falling asleep and rolling over), you're welcomed to a delightful, ear-piercing shriek! So much for noise cancellation.

    Oh yea, the Sony's are less than half the price, too. I've been using a pair for years.

    1. Re:A much better solution by blazin · · Score: 2

      I haven't noticed any feedback problem, but I don't think I've fallen asleep on them either. I have noticed that a light tap on the outside will result is a pretty forceful sound inside the headphones.

  112. Thats not actually true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any linear distortion by the speaker is no problem at all, it simply gets taken into account during the filtering. Non-linear distortion is hard to correct, but I doubt its an issue.

  113. Bose and Lotus Have Done This Before by dbretton · · Score: 2

    Many years ago, Bose produced a set of noise-cancellation headphones used for aviation purposes. They're pretty damn cool, and pretty damn expensive.

    Also, about 5 years back, Lotus had actually developed technology to cancel out engine noise in the cockpit of their cars.
    Funny thing about that one was that, though they developed the technology, the chose not to deploy it on their vehicles as their signature tinny engine sound was something Lotus owners really liked about the cars.

  114. Ouch! by sfrenchie · · Score: 1
    Am I the only one that thinks this is a bad idea?

    I'm not really familiar with this technology, but I assume that the cancelling waves - although they mask the sound - still travel into our ears just as the original sound.

    Having twice the ammount of noise going into my eardrum seems like a bad idea to me...

    Is my assumption correct? If so, count me out!

    --

    "The scientist describes what is; The engineer creates what never was." - Theodore von Karman
  115. Tested in Cars? by Uttles · · Score: 2

    OK, so we all want to have a smoot, quite ride, but do we really want to have noise reducers that artificially remove sound? I don't think so. Think about it, what if you need to hear the firetruck screaming down the street headed your way. What if your engine starts making funny noises but you can't hear it well enough to know something's wrong. What will it make your stereo sound like? These kind of issues are endless, I just don't think it's a good idea.

    --

    ~ now you know
  116. A Husbands Dream Come True... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    wife: "Honey did you take out the tra..."
    (sound of fingers slapping keyboard)
    computer: "Silence Machine activated"
    husband: "Aghh that's better. Now I can finish that post I was writing to Slashdot"


    Free speech? Sure talk all ya want. :) "click"

  117. Cool! Can you use this one for a quiet PC? by egghat · · Score: 1

    Has anybody tried to modify this one to cancel the noise from/inside a PC? There was a previous post on slashdot for this one. But building it for yourself is way cooler ...

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  118. Courtrooms by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

    We have got to install these in American courtrooms. Point them directly at the lawyers.

    While we're at it, let's set these up around MTV studios in Times Square. Bliss.

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  119. One way to omit noise... by rnturn · · Score: 2

    ... (besides the obvious solution of turning the computer off and reading a book, that is) is to move it out of the room. If Larry Ellison is still selling his network computers... I'm in the market. I've moved all but one computer into a rack down in the basement and would move the remaining one if I could find an really quiet desktop device like an X-terminal that I could hang my 19-in monitor off of. I'd rather listen to my stereo than whirring disk drives and muffin fans. Any pointers on where the affordable devices like this are for sale (HDS's prices for their X-terminals are steeper than I'd like to pay)?

    Headphone? Seems stupid and, ultimately, uncomfortable for long-term wearing. (Though they might be nice -- along with some long-johns -- for those stints I sometimes spend in the data center doing upgrades. :-) )

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  120. Re:Arthur C. Clarke Short Story "Silence, Please" by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    It was in "Tales from the White Hart" and the story was "Silence, Please." The real issue, raised by one character in the story (Clarke showing he understood it) and glossed over for the sake of the story, is how you can create a three-dimensional sound field that will accurately cancel a three-dimensional noise sound field everywhere (or at least over a large area, not just at a single point).

    A stereo system creates a sound field that sounds like the real sound field, just as a .jpg looks like the full picture. But to CANCEL a sound field, you need to quantitatively DUPLICATE it in three dimensions with opposite polarity, not just SOUND LIKE it.

    In the story, the device fails because of conservation of energy. Sound energy can't be destroyed, so the total energy in the area of silence has to go someplace else. In the story it's the capacitors in the power supply. In the real world, it's an interesting question, but sound doesn't have all THAT much energy and it can't be THAT hard to dissipate a few hundred watts (or, as someone else suggested, reduce the noise in one area and intensify it in another).

    Something else that makes me really suspicious about the practicality of the device is that you have to do awfully high quality cancellation to get much of a perceptual effect. For example, if you were to match the sound field with 90% accuracy and cancel all but 10%, you'd get a 20 db reduction which would be noticeable, but certainly would not silence the noise. And it would be far less effective than even the cheapest earplugs.

  121. Another solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just make a osc1~ object in jmax and set it to 15000 hz and volume to 1 and leave for a couple of hours :-) I've broken in several neighbors this way, and you can do it through the ventilation with a $5 tweeter from RadioShack even.

    1. Re:Another solution by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      Im not sure what you would break with a 15Khz Buzz at low volume. Although, If you had a 22Khz square wave at high volume you could blow the tweeters. Or maybe a .125Hz Square or sawtooth at high volume one might rip the cone of the subwoofer. My problem has allways been getting access to the equipment.

    2. Re:Another solution by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Agreed. The object is to transfer acustic energy to an object. Resonance will fill an object to its seams. The key is locating the sweet spots with the signal generator. When you hear something rattle, its time to turn up the volume in hopes of hearing the sweet music of something dancing onto the floor.

  122. I wonder.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how animals like cats, dogs and birds react on those machines.

  123. Question for you. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    What is the sound quality of those bose headphones though? I mean, compared to, say, some standard GOOD headphones.. like...
    Grado 60's, or Sennheiser HD330 or HD570's.
    (All around $60-$150)

    I mean with the noise cancelling turned on. What is the response? I ask only because in my experience a great many of the headphones out there are utter crap when it comes to decent sound reproduction. Most Sony headphones are crap until you get into their high end ones, you get 5x the quality from sennheiser or grado for the price. Same with most other brands.
    I have no experience with Bose, other than their speakers, which, although amazing at first listen, actually butcher the crap out of your audio. It sounds good, but it's not an accurate reproduction.

    1. Re:Question for you. by shackfu · · Score: 1

      They cost about $300, but are worth every cent. I fly every week, and will never fly without them again! They sound great, even in the office. The only problem I have with them is they pick up a lot of noise from my laptop, though... Wrong impedence, I believe...

    2. Re:Question for you. by blazin · · Score: 1

      I agree. I use them at home on the computer when I want to play games and my wife wants to watch TV. They cancel out the computer fans, the TV, etc and they sound very good.

      I've brought them into work and used just the noise cancelling part (no source music or anything) in the server rooms where usually anything below a dull shout from point blank range will go unheard. I was able to hear conversations occurring across the room with little difficulty.

      Everyone that I have let try them out was amazed at how much sound is cancelled out, meaning how much noise there is all the time even in "quiet" rooms. Most people just ignore the sounds of computer fans, refrigerator, etc, but put these on for 5 seconds with noise cancelling on, then turn it off and you're amazed at how much extra sound there is. Plus someone can still talk to you and it won't cancel them out (can be good or bad).

    3. Re:Question for you. by Gleef · · Score: 2

      mindstrm writes:

      What is the sound quality of those bose headphones though? I mean, compared to, say, some standard GOOD headphones.. like...
      Grado 60's, or Sennheiser HD330 or HD570's.
      (All around $60-$150)

      I mean with the noise cancelling turned on. What is the response? I ask only because in my experience a great many of the headphones out there are utter crap when it comes to decent sound reproduction. Most Sony headphones are crap until you get into their high end ones, you get 5x the quality from sennheiser or grado for the price. Same with most other brands.
      I have no experience with Bose, other than their speakers, which, although amazing at first listen, actually butcher the crap out of your audio. It sounds good, but it's not an accurate reproduction.


      My understanding is you shouldn't get these headphones if you are looking for state-of-the-art sound response from your fancy stereo. You get these headphones if you want to be able to get understandable voices and/or enjoyable music while surrounded by machinery churning out 100dB of low frequency noise. They probably don't publish the response and fidelity figures because they probably compare poorly with their more traditional headphones.

      The technology was originally developed for the military. I would assume they were much more interested in a pilot being able to hear vocal orders and information come in clearly over the radio, than whether or not the timpani sounded perfect in a symphony. Under the circumstances I think a little butchery of the sound is acceptable.

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
  124. A far superior solution by iotaborg · · Score: 3, Informative

    Would be to use Etymotic ER-6 or ER-4 (see etymotic's website).

    Etymotic's canalphones use passive noise cancelling to cancel around 25dB and is way more effective than most of the active units you get. Most of the active units handle low frequency noise well but the high frequencies pass. Passive noise cancellation (Etymotics use the ol fashion earplugs) blocks the entire frequency range and is more effective than the Bose or Sony units as it does not add additional circuitry that could screw things up.

    Whats even more is that the Etymotics have *amazing* sound quality (which both the Bose and Sony truly lack), they are some of the best headphones out there, although a little expensive for most (ER-6 is $130 and ER-4 is $270 at Headroom. And no I do not work for etymotic and I really didn't mean for this post to be an ad, if it came off as one :)

    1. Re:A far superior solution by HEbGb · · Score: 2

      I tried these out when I was shopping for mine.

      What it comes down to is that the etymotics do have better sound quality, but their 'cancellation' is non-existant - they're simply passive 'sound blockers'. They don't negate the sound waves at all.

      They're really just well designed earplugs. They do block sound, but they do NOT 'cancel' it. So their efficacy at lower frequencies (such as plane rumble) is not very good.

      You're right that active noise cancellation doesn't work very well for high frequencies - but passive blocking does. So the Sony's gave me the best of both worlds - solid cancellation at low frequencies, and effective blocking of sound at higher frequencies.

  125. Used to work at Creative Labs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and suggested a noise cancelling feature on the SB Live numerous times. It is not that hard to do but the product manager is more interested in having monthly reports rather then really improving the product. That was 3 years ago.

  126. Im in noise hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I looked into using a simular technology to quiet down;

    1) A 'Portable classroom' air conditioning unit dropped 10 feet from my property line (25 feet from my bedroom window) 60 dBA , 75 dBC (lots of bass).

    2) Neibors 3-4 dogs that bark at everything, and love to howl at sirens.

    3) Neibors kids Boomin car stereos, license plate 'Got20s' (and now his brother too).

    But decided it would not work correctly for a couple of reasons. First its quite hard to accurately reproduce frequency's below 35 HZ unless you are willing to use a very large box, (about the size of a car interior) or expensive technolgy. Secondly, while noise cancelation would produce a quite zone, it would also produce noisy zones as well. This is because the off axis response and early reflections that end up in phase. Lastly large amounts of bass causes other things to vibrate causing secondary noise which may be more annoying then the original.

    Community Noise is a problem no matter the source, If you wan't to help make the world more quite, I would suggest visiting 'The Noise Polution Clearing House' at http://nonoise.org

    P.S. I find that using a pair of 18" hooked up to my game box and playing unreal tourney works great for eliminating a boomy car stereos parked in my neibors driveway, and its fun too. Castle Wolfenstien also works but is quite abit less bassy than unreal.

  127. Real world problems.... by tomdarch · · Score: 1

    Real world noise cancelation, particularly in large areas is really tricky. Part of my architecture practice is designing veterinary clinics, which have all sorts of noise problems. The biggest problem is that you don't want to hear the sounds Spot makes during some necessary proceedures when you are out in the waiting room. I've spent a lot of time explaining why white noise generators won't work for this to my boss. He reads 'noise maksing' and 'noise cancelation' in an ad and takes it at face value.

    White noise systems basically use a psychoacoustic trick to make conversations less distracting: By lowering the signal to noise ratio, you brain is less likely to pick up on the conversation in the next cube, and you feel less distracted. Noise cancelation is typically only available in very small spaces: like inside headphones. The point to the article is that for a lot of money, you can make the very small space somewhat larger.

    When you read the article, it's clear that they are only talking about noise suppression in quite small areas. Great for my girlfriend sitting on the couch studying (currently distracted by her neighbors in the next apartment who can't interact with their children other than by screaming). But this won't help me when trying to quiet a whole waiting room. Basically we need to build exam rooms like music practice rooms - (physically) heavy walls with few penetrations.

  128. This could be a really bad thing... by dunkan44 · · Score: 1

    With just a little fine tuning.. the words "Honey, are you listening to me?" take on a whole new meaning..

    1. Re:This could be a really bad thing... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Bets are on for how long until someone wears a pair of sound blocking headphones while walking on railroad tracks, "Gee, the ground is vibrating but I don't hear a thing."

      Now if we could just get rid of the a-holes who produce all the noise (i.e. souped up Harley riders, those damn backing-up beepers on trucks, etc).

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:This could be a really bad thing... by dunkan44 · · Score: 1

      bets are also on for how long before that same person sues the makers for not including a warning label stating "device may cause wearer not to hear oncoming train while walking on tracks" and win..

  129. Tom Swift Jr. lives! by mwood · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one old enough to remember the one wherein Tom built active noise cancellers to defeat some bad guy who was using deafening sound as a weapon?

    (Now that I think of it, the active-camouflage suits that MIT is working on are a variation of Tom's submarine that made itself invisible to sonar by cancelling the echo and copying the pulse through to the other side of the boat. Pretty soon there won't be any fiction left!)

  130. Typical by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't that just like the typical Slashdotter, making things SOOOO much more complicated than needed? If the PCs and equipment in your room are unacceptably loud...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    wait for it
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    ...
    TURN THEM OFF.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  131. Hey! by Mr.Mustard · · Score: 1

    That's my karma line.

    Thief!

    :P

    --
    fnord
    1. Re:Hey! by shepd · · Score: 1

      >That's my karma line.

      Sorry... which line exactly? If its my sig, I only changed it yesterday when I got bored reading this.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:Hey! by Mr.Mustard · · Score: 1

      The Headwize link. see?

      --
      fnord
  132. Dream solution to bass noise by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1


    Please make it legal for me to beat the life out of those a-holes who drive around with their bass cranked up to the point where you can hear it inside buildings. I don't care if they have arrested development issues or a desperate need for attention, I don't want to hear their crappy music. Hell, you can't even hear the music, just the same monotonous thudding (c)rap beat. These clowns must have no eardrums left.

    A clear case of society getting shafted just a little bit more in the name of the all-mighty inDUHvidual. I'd be amazed if they actually started enforcing local sound laws (already on the books) against these jerks.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  133. Simple noise canceling system by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Try, this...

    Stick your fingers in your ears while chanting "I can't hear you!" or humming the national anthem.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  134. Hmmmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I tune this thing to my wife's voice?

  135. The only stupid question is the one you don't ask? by PerpetualMotion · · Score: 1

    Ok...I'm no scientist, and I long for quality silence, shut my windows and the computer still hums, turn that off and the house makes noises, put on the headphones and the wind is still audible unless I actually play some music which kind of defeats the purpose. Nature, technology, the world, all out to stimulate my ear drum.

    Here is the question. Is this new fangled white noise more noise pumped into my ear designed to fool me into thinking I'm not hearing anything, or is it truly canceling out the sound waves so they do not enter.

    Am I just signing up for a preview for my future where I will accept the label "hard of hearing" or will this actually give my mind, and eardrum some relief.

  136. Commercial Applications Only by Xofer+D · · Score: 2
    Like a lot of others, I was interested in this, thinking that it might be a consumer device. I went looking though, and found this article from the bombay IEEE student newsletter which talks about the device. It says " The cost according to Prof. Wright is likely to be a few thousand pounds making it practical only for commercial use."

    On the other hand, the article also has some (thin) technical details:

    For the technically inclined, this facility measures 6m x 6m x 5m; the eight channel system is based on a Texas instruments tms320c32 processor using a two tap filter and a circular buffer technique to implement the delayed version of the update algorithm. This allows easy algorithm implementation in software and significantly reduces computation time for a large number of channels a 16 - input, 8 - output. PC 16108 provides a 12-bit interface with the external equipment. This board contains three selectable levels of gain: 1,10,100.
    Does anyone know about the latency involved with using a tms320c32? It might be possible to rig a software solution to run on a PC, perhaps leading to a homebrew version.

    Has anyone had any experience doing programming of this nature? Bear in mind that response time would have to be very low to cancel noise that you didn't predict (such as low-frequency hums, fan noise, etc).

    --
    The Signal/Noise ratio can be improved in two ways. Remaining silent is the OTHER way.
  137. Re:Car noise-cancelling by Galvatron · · Score: 2

    Who else here thinks the silencing ought to be mandatory for motorcycles? God those fucking things piss me off.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  138. build this into fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the noise my computers generate seem to be from the fans. I wonder how difficult it would be to build this into the fans themselves. Very close range, regular sound pattern, seems a lot less challenging what this guy in the article is trying to do, and should be at least as cheap as noise cancelling head phones. At the right price I think there would be a market for SILENT cpu and case fans.

  139. Why quiet in a noisy environment? by tcc · · Score: 2

    In my case, I got used to sleep with the computers turned on in the bedroom, the idea is that when everything is totally silent, I hear all the unregular noises, clicks, walking, neighbour yelling, whatever.. the computer noise is regular and after many years I guess my brain got used to that specific frequency and it doesn't stop me from sleeping at all... If I turn everything off, I wake up at any unregular sound, and I find it very irritating.

    Man that will be weird when the girlfriend will move in. I just hope that one won't do the mistake of asking me to chose between her and the computers :)

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  140. Dealing with noise sources by dattaway · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No one would suspect a thing!

    The power of denial is the great leverage of communication when they KNOW you have done something. Give them enough suspision, but not enough proof. The social engineering object is to use this opportunity to drive your loud argument into their weakened, desperate state.

    Intimidate by the power of denial. When they accuse, use this precious time to illustrate their vulnerability. Be mad, not just pissed off. Twist their logic into epic proportions of insanity. They will either leave you alone, or try to match wits. Always trump their argument with a more grandiose element of insanity and do not let them win. After all, they have been playing rap (or other lame noise) at unhuman levels for an inordinate amount of time. Illustrate the chaos they have created.

    But always deny knowledge. In this war, you must fight noise with noise. This is insanity at its best. Replace it with your projection how annoying they are. It will throw them off if they try to make a logical case against you. The resulting communication about noise is sure to be music to the ears of other victims.

  141. Here's a more practical application by billcopc · · Score: 1

    The day they invent a device that can cancel out my girlfriend's voice, is the day I'll gladly give them all my money.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  142. The thing is.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Bose seems to provide absolutely no standard audio information on their website about these headphones. They go on and on about noise cancelling abilities, and how great all their adapters are, but I can't find anywhere where they show a response curve, impedence, THD, etc.

  143. doesn't cancel the damage I have heard by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I'd be interested in seeing what people on here say - but from what I have heard - the damage to your ears can still be done, but you don't get all the noise... I personally don't see how that is - but I'd be curious if this would help prevent some of the damage from noise pollution or else we will be a world of deaf people in a few years seeing as the number of noisemakers is increasing at a rapid rate over the previous years.
    (or tell me a good hearing aid company to invest in)

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  144. cube noise cancelling device... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hurry up and invent something that will let me blast music in my cube, but cancel it outside the cube...

  145. not so funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mom's a pediatrician, and she talked to a hearing specialist at the hospital about my loud computers. He said in the long term, loud desktop computers can cause tinnitus (ringing in the ears) just like too many rock concerts. I have a Chrome Orb on my Athlon, it's not quiet.. I make sure to keep it under an adjacent desk, on the carpet, and away from my bed. It's also in a good quiet case.

    I don't have a link to a study since I just take my mom's word, but if anyone has one please post it. I do, however, have a slight case of tinnitus.

    1. Re:not so funny by Bill+Ashley · · Score: 0

      I'm probably going deaf but I just play the music louder to compensate... :) :( so I'm an idiot either I'm going to be careless really angry or happy at my new set of ears any of the three I guess I'm willing to deal with. As far as the fan goes on my amd I like the noise for the most part. I really on like silence in nature ... or when trying to be completely relaxed or not wanting to here my nephew in the mornin but I have earplugs when I need them. How can the fan cause ringing in the ears? I think I'm going to read that study. Really though due to my love of electronic music I will probably go deaf very young.

      --
      hmm sooner
  146. Re:Car noise-cancelling by RFC959 · · Score: 2

    If you'd actually talk to some of the riders of "those fucking things", you might find out that for them, being loud is a matter of safety. Motorcycles are harder to see (particularly because most drivers aren't looking for them) and the riders are much more vulnerable in crashes. They need all the "visibility" they can get. Of course, not all of them need to be as loud as they are...

  147. Real Life Example - Total Noise Cancellation by Lagrange5 · · Score: 1

    A few years ago my girlfriend told me that her next-door apartment neighbor liked to play loud, bassy rap music. She had politely complained to him on a couple of occasions, but he tended to resume his behavior after a while, and she was ready to get the landlord involved.

    I decided to try a psyop instead, so I brought my CD of Pulse Demon by Merzbow, stayed at my gf's apartment for a couple of days, and waited.

    Her neighbor began pumping his stereo pretty loud, and I gave it a few minutes before I ran my "test." I pointed my gf's speakers to the wall and started Merzbow on very low volume, and slowly cranked it until there would be no mistaking the unholy scream of industrial noise on the other side of the wall. Then we closed the bedroom door and turned up the TV to mask the noise (we didn't want to terrorize ourselves too!).

    We waited a full half hour before the guy finally came to the door, and although he was miffed, he seemed more confused than angry. He didn't know what it was. I apologized sweetly and explained that I was showing my gf how to use a shortwave radio a bit too loudly, and oh-by-the-way, could he turn his stereo down too? He said sorry, and left with the same quizzical look he brought with him.

    I left my Merzbow CD with her, just in case, and her neighbor rarely played his stereo very loud after that. Apparently the guy moved out a couple of months later. We have Merzbow to thank for his service.

    --

    --
    "Folks just call him Buckethead." -- Les Claypool
  148. Re:Car noise-cancelling by Galvatron · · Score: 2
    If they're interested in safety, then they should not be riding motorcycles. Trying to make motorcycles safe by making them loud is like driving around with your brights on to make you more visible, it's more distracting than anything.


    I have "talked to the riders of 'those fucking things,'" my father rode motorcycles in his youth, until a crash shattered his hip, putting him in a cast for most of a year (during which he lost a good 10 lbs of leg muscle), and permanently shortening one of his legs. And yes, the crash occured despite how noisy his motorcycle was.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD