Slashdot Mirror


Attack of the Clones: Less Plastic Crap, More Story?

Newsweek has an article in which George Lucas states that there were parts of Episode One that were damaging to the Star Wars franchise. (shocker, I know) "The last movie did not live up to expectations." They'll cut the merchandise by two thirds, as they still have tons of unsold Episode One merchandise. Yahoo is also running an AOTC story. Mild spoilers in the linked stories, by the way.

431 comments

  1. Episode II= Chick Flick by ltsmash · · Score: 1

    For some reason I have this huge fear the Episode II will be somewhat of a click flick. Please tell me I'm wrong.

    1. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by Brad+Wilson · · Score: 1

      Okay... you're wrong, and Harry says so. :)

    2. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by hexdcml · · Score: 1

      who cares?? this looks pretty good.. chick flick or not.two words.. Natalie Portman! hahhaha, now plus loads of cool action sequences (at least from the trailers they were cool). Heck, even it is a chick flick, at least it would be cool to get my girlfriend interested in Star Wars! :)

      --
      Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    3. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by inerte · · Score: 3, Funny

      For some reason I have this huge fear the Episode II will be somewhat of a click flick. Please tell me I'm wrong.

      Clusters of wannabe Portman teenager girls, worry about that for a second.

    4. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liar, you don't have a girlfriend.

    5. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by ajrs · · Score: 1

      boy meets girl


      boy gets girl


      boy gets to big for his britches


      girl dumps boy


      boy becomes evil, kills all of his friends. maybe the girl too.


      yeah, sounds like a chick flick
    6. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by TrollBurger · · Score: 0
      Clusters of wannabe Portman teenager girls


      Worry about it!? I'd revel in the chance to pick up a youn portman wannabe.


      You know, dress up as Anakin, offer to show her your um... lightsaber..

    7. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man oh man, I wish Star Wars would be a chick flick, then I wouldn't hear groans when I pop in a star wars movie.

    8. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your hoping that she'll like the mainstream starwars movie just like the sell out movie makers are hoping.Works for them but mean while the fans (yourself included?) suffer with shit like Jar-Jar.

      LMAO

    9. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by rosewood · · Score: 2

      There is unrest in the Galactic Senate
      Several hundred solar systems under
      the leadership of the rebel leader, Count
      Dooku, have decalred their intentions to
      secede from the Republic.

      This separatist movement has made it
      difficult for the limited number of
      Jedi Kights to maintain peace and
      order in the galaxy.

      Senator Amidala, the former Queen of
      Naboo, is returning to Coruscant
      to vote on the critical issue
      of creating an army to assist the
      overwhelmed Jedi.

    10. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by The+Fold · · Score: 1

      Amen to that brother ;)

    11. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by minghe · · Score: 1

      "For some reason I have this huge fear the Episode II will be somewhat of a click flick. Please tell me I'm wrong."

      No you're not wrong. You DO have that fear.

      --
      ...um...like...a sig...
    12. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by Surlyboi · · Score: 1

      Clusters of wannabe Portman teenager girls, worry about that for a second.

      Is that with or without the hot grits?

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
    13. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by jo42 · · Score: 1
      They'll cut the merchandise by two thirds

      They lie. Stores already have all this gadawful Star Wars Episode 2 crudge in them. Most of the dredge you don't even know who or what it is because the movie isn't out yet!

    14. Re:Episode II= Chick Flick by inerte · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are condoms that glow in the dark. You haven't lived until you have used one of them and whisped "Swooooooosh, Vuuuummmm, Zuououoummmm" while making strange dances.

  2. see also by EricBoyd · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    alt.starwars.jarjar.die.die.die

    :-)

    Websurfing done right! - StumbleUpon

    --
    augment your senses: http://sensebridge.net/
  3. Could you please... by Brad+Wilson · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...start reporting things before they're entire days (sometimes weeks) old? It's quite off-putting when us nerds get the news faster from Fark, which is hardly known to be the Speedy Gonzalez of news services. ;)

    1. Re:Could you please... by grinwell · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everyone should just skip AOTC and wait for the AOTC 2003 edit to come out.

      The Phantom Edit

      This news *is* a little old.
      The original fark link on 4/21

    2. Re:Could you please... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Personally sometimes I don't mind if /. reports stuff slightly out of date, after all I come here mostly for the discussion, not really for the news themselves (at least most of the time)

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    3. Re:Could you please... by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 2

      Perhaps this is more to your liking?

    4. Re:Could you please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come for the goatse, stay for the trolls!

    5. Re:Could you please... by Omerna · · Score: 2

      I find that the split for news/ discussion is about 50-50. I always read/ post in the discussions, but I also find myself hearing people discussing things that I read on Slashdot earlier that day or even days before. In conclusion it doesn't MATTER when Slashdot posts something, but an awful lot of the time they're actually with or ahead of the rest of the media.

      --


      No sig for you.
    6. Re:Could you please... by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but apparently the editors post to maximize revenue, which is front-page pageviews (and adviews) (This is what inspired the Blackout). So you'd imagine they'd be wanting exclusives, or at least to be the first site propagating these sorts of stories to a wide audience.

      Back on topic: after seeing SWI:TPM, nothing Lucas does will get me to see another of his films. Unless maybe he does that Jar Jar Binks snuff film that people have been proposing. :/

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  4. Tough Problem by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to help out so that they continue to have a chance to make some better Episodes.

    Maybe they could unload some of the many Jar Jar dolls in sporting goods stores interested in diversifying their range of marksmanship targets?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Tough Problem by Stonehand · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think this Lucas quote says it best:


      "There's only one issue for a filmmaker," he says. "Will this make its money back so I can make the next one?"


      From a Time Magazine article.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Tough Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has enough money to his fat faced name to make 30 more movies.

      He made the orginal star wars for 1/1000th the cost of these new ones and its still better.

      Death to fatty greed monster lucas.

    3. Re:Tough Problem by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

      Cool, I looked up that reference, and found it on Google in here. I am going to add this site to my list of favourites, it is something I have been wanting for years, as an ex-Christian.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

  5. but what about...? by DaBjork · · Score: 1

    Ok, but let's not forget the important questions brewing on every real star wars fan's mind...IS JAR JAR BINKS GOING TO EVER POKE HIS UGLY MUG ON SCREEN AGAIN? because if so I am returning my light saber.

    1. Re:but what about...? by Stonehand · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's Senator Jar-Jar Binks, at least according to IMDB and other sources.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:but what about...? by krugdm · · Score: 1

      RTFA.

      Jar Jar will have a "blissfully small" role in AOTC.

    3. Re:but what about...? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Where do you get off calling Jar Jar "ugly?" Star Wars is supposed to have aliens in it, and from an entirely aesthetic standpoint, Jar Jar is a very cool looking alien.

      We hate him primarily for three reasons. First, his whiny, nasal, pseudo-Jamaican voice. Second, his entirely unfunny clumsiness and Jerry Lewis-esque pratfalls. Finally, there's his "How rude" catchphrase, which was ripped off a mediocre sitcom that nobody on /. would ever admit having watched.

      Jar Jar, I believe, can be saved. There's a good decade between Episodes I and II, which provides plenty of time for character development. First, we lower his voice an octave or two. Since we know nothing of Gungan physiology, it's possible that Binks was on the tail end of adolesence, and his vocal cords weren't fully developed. Then, ship him off to war. He is a general, after all. A few years in the trenches and he might toughen up and learn just enough to be more dangerous to the enemy than himself. Finally, war has made him cynical and bitter, so we can replace "how rude" with "kiss my amphibious ass."

      Make those changes, and I think everyone would agree that Jar Jar would be tolerable, and possibly even cool.

      Or go to plan B, which has Jar Jar meet his decapatastic demise at the hands of the Emperor in the first thirty seconds of the movie.

      Neither will happen, of course. But can't I dream?

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    4. Re:but what about...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Finally, there's his "How rude" catchphrase, which was ripped off a mediocre sitcom that nobody on /. would ever admit having watched.

      I admit it. I, Anonymous Coward have watched F...
      no, I cannot do this...
      *rushes out*

    5. Re:but what about...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i watched it for the girls...

      them olsen twins back then... WOW! ;)

    6. Re:but what about...? by MCZapf · · Score: 1
      "How Rude"

      Didn't C3PO also say this? That's what annoys me.

    7. Re:but what about...? by Spoing · · Score: 4, Funny
      That's Senator Jar-Jar Binks, at least according to IMDB [imdb.com] and other sources.

      Well, sadly, that explains laws like the DMCA.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    8. Re:but what about...? by JWW · · Score: 2

      Oh my God, you're right!! Full House ripped of Star Wars!!

  6. Whew! by jmoriarty · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least now I know no major characters die at the end of the movie. Otherwise it would have been mentioned on Slashdot's main page.

    1. Re:Whew! by qslack · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      At least now I know no major characters die at the end of the movie. Otherwise it would have been mentioned on Slashdot's main page.


      How much you wanna bet that Hollywood snuck in a "Digital Millenium Spoiler Act" and that you're gonna be busted for stealing their profits? :)

      Anyways, remember that **N&SYN.C (or however you format it) is making a cameo? They are all going to be Jedi Knights. Now, if only movies were more like real life -- apparently, they are going to be killed by the Empire within seconds of their appearance.

    2. Re:Whew! by batkiwi · · Score: 2

      http://www.ananova.com/entertainment/story/sm_4918 17.html

      check up on facts first

      that's one of many links pointing out they were dropped by searching "nsync star wars" in google.

    3. Re:Whew! by inerte · · Score: 1

      apparently, they are going to be killed by the Empire within seconds of their appearance.

      Pop!

      Read the other article linked at Yahoo's one, they are not going to appear anymore.

    4. Re:Whew! by wishus · · Score: 2
      Anyways, remember that **N&SYN.C (or however you format it) is making a cameo? They are all going to be Jedi Knights.

      According to one of the linked articles that you evidently did not read, N-Sync ended up "on the cutting room floor."

    5. Re:Whew! by dimator · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you really must know....

      MAJOR SPOILERS!!
      http://www.aaronmccray.com/entertainment/episode2p lot.html

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    6. Re:Whew! by qslack · · Score: 5, Funny

      check up on facts first

      Welcome to Slashdot!

    7. Re:Whew! by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      "MAJOR SPOILERS!!"

      Man, I hope the movie is better than that. Maybe I'm just pesimistic, but that read just like the phantom menace.

      I didn't much like the phantom menace...I probably won't much like this one either. Too bad really, but I guess I'll live.

    8. Re:Whew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go outside once in a while. Seek therapy.

    9. Re:Whew! by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Talk about a good publicity machine - you get to be in the news even if you're not in a movie!

    10. Re:Whew! by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Thanks for the link! (but turn off the background image or you can't read it)

      Minor spoiler: If the movie follows this plot then George has forgotton the bottom line premise of the series: R2D2 and C-3PO are our witnesses (C-3PO tells us the story, as shown at the end of Episode VI). They are present at every major plot point, but in Episode II (as presented at the above link) neither is with Obi-Wan when he goes to Kamino and Geonosis, and I don't see any way around that in post-production. Oops!

      (Yes, I know they can learn of those events from Obi-Wan, as they must learn of the minor side events from others in all the movies, but this is the first major story segment that one or the other of them doesn't personally witness. Watch I, IV, V, and VI again and you'll see what I mean.)

      More minor spoilage: Oh, and why the heck doesn't C-3PO recognize his former home and Uncle Owen in Episode IV? R2D2 might recognize them, but he's keeping his mouth shut because he's looking for Obi-Wan; C-3PO knows nothing of Leia's instructions to R2D2 and has no reason to stay mum if he recognizes Owen, which means he doesn't. OK, Owen's older, but he should at least recognize Tatooine in general and the farm in particular. I wondered about that when I saw Episode I, and this plot for II confirms it.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    11. Re:Whew! by snkline · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe their memory has been wiped. It is a standard practice afterall. I don't think they would have stopped having their memories flushed occasionally until Luke bought them.

    12. Re:Whew! by nfras · · Score: 2, Insightful

      C-3PO is not present at the battle of Naboo, not really a minor plot point. Maybe the midichlorians told him what happened.

      C-3PO is a droid. Everything he sees, hears etc would be stored. Which would also mean that he would remember that Anakin was Darth Vader and that he had children, and that one of them had been left with Owen Lars on Tatooine. It would seem logical that parts of his memory would be deleted to avoid that information falling into the wrong hands.

      --
      You call me a pedant? I prefer the term "correct"
    13. Re:Whew! by pisdtal · · Score: 1
      ...and breathe deeply, in through the nose out through the mouth
      in with the pink, out with the blue
      calmmmmmmmmm,calmmmmmmmmm,calmmmmmmmm

      repeat as nescesary

      --
      We admit all this to insure disbelief
    14. Re:Whew! by hardburn · · Score: 1

      As another poster pointed out, it is likely that their memories were wiped. Beyond being standard practice for droid maintence, it is probably likely that they had to wipe them to keep Luke & Leia's locations a secret from their father.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    15. Re:Whew! by Observador · · Score: 1

      must have been one of those nasty crashes that come about when you use the evil empire's bloated buggy OS...

      --
      I wish I could filter out the annoying Pickens articles...
    16. Re:Whew! by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 3, Insightful
      R2D2 is present at the battle of Naboo. I said one or the other is present at all major plot points. For example, R2D2 goes with Luke when he searches for this "Yoda" character, while C-3PO stays with Leia.

      If C-3PO's memory is wiped, how can he tell us the story? Naturally I thought of that, but it doesn't fit. C-3PO and R2D2 are the only characters present in all nine episodes (at least, according to Lucas). C-3PO must remember the whole storyline or he can't be the storyteller.

      Anakin doesn't become Darth Vader until Episode III; we don't (yet) know if either C-3PO or R2D2 witness this transformation, or even know that Anakin has children. But I'll grant you that George Lucas will probably mess that up, too, leaving the droid's apparant memory loss in Episode IV a more obvious mistake.

      Either that or Anakin's children are born sometime between Episodes III and IV (and not witnessed by either droid), which would leave a big gap in the story IMO. I've aways wondered how Anakin could have two children and only know of one. Leia is Luke's sister, but are they twins, and Anakin assumed there was only one child? Was Luke born before Anakin becomes Vader, and Leia after (Anakin didn't know Padmé was pregnant again)? We may never know.

      Or perhaps Lucas will re-re-edit Episode IV to "fix" this error: C-3PO - "Master Owen, how good to see you again, sir!" Owen - "Good lord, not C-3PO. [turns to the Jawas] Are you sure you don't have any other droids that can speak binary to my condensers?"

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  7. ,nice hype but... by metalhed77 · · Score: 2, Funny

    doesn't the dialog in the new trailer look just as bad as episode 1?

    --
    Photos.
    1. Re:,nice hype but... by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      The dialogue is better, but it's the same bad acting, of course. :)

    2. Re:,nice hype but... by Wraithlyn · · Score: 3, Funny
      Yes... but...

      ***spoilers***

      • Yoda manipulating Force lightning and kicking ass with a lightsaber!
      • Many dozens of Jedis in a huge battle royale!
      • Boba Fett and father!
      • Extremely low Jar Jar content!
      • Natalie Portman in frolic mode!
      • Galactic War!
      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    3. Re:,nice hype but... by dswensen · · Score: 2

      Maybe you were being sarcastic, but... yeah!!!

    4. Re:,nice hype but... by shadowbearer · · Score: 0


      2 x 10 ^ 4 Natalie Portman hairdos!

      I'm wondering....does Yoda have a *short* lightsaber?

      In all seriousness, the battle scenes in the trailers look
      fantastic....

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:,nice hype but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Natalie Portman in frolic mode!

      Where she acts as an apologist for the Jewish extermination of the Palestinian people...

  8. Lucas trying desparately to save face by delphin42 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The toys went on sale yesterday at midnight, a month before the movie is released.

    Spoiler footage will be aired on FOX during a showing of Empire Strikes Back this week (Thurs night).

    Rumor has it that at least one person was shown Ep 2 (an early version) at the SXSW film festival in Austin a month ago (see earlier /. story).

    Lucas is clearly trying hard to atone for his mistakes, but the real issue is whether AotC sucks as bad as tPM. I believe the hype machine will be successful in generating a ton of ticket sales on opening weekend. The question is whether fans will go again and again because the movie recaptures the magic of the original trilogy.

    --
    -- Adam
  9. yeah right... by hummer357 · · Score: 1

    'attack of the clones'??

    yeah right...

    'attack of the license to print more free money' is more like it.

    1. Re:yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, this film is about IBM in the 80's, and how they lost the PC market.

    2. Re:yeah right... by Dwaynewayne · · Score: 1

      I must be getting old, that sounds like a more interesting movie.

    3. Re:yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL!

  10. let down by GutBomb · · Score: 1

    episode one let alot of people down and i imagine most people are going to see episode two to see if it will be as bad as episode one, not to see it on it's own merits, or the fact that it is a star wars movie alone. with that said, i hope to be pleasently suprised with the outcome.

  11. I only hope so... by ringbarer · · Score: 1

    I need them to bring out those Life Size Jar Jar Dolls again!

    --
    "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
    1. Re:I only hope so... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      And people worry about the Church of Scientology....

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:I only hope so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jar Jar sucks, but it's funny how fundamentalists see a moral problem even where there is none. IE. Jar Jar

    3. Re:I only hope so... by mab · · Score: 1

      Is that site for real or what ?

    4. Re:I only hope so... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      And yes, I know it's not for real. But the frightening part is, it's not that far from. There were, after all, Christian sects trying to get most Disney movies banned. Beauty and the Beast, for example. For similar reasons; black magic, beastiality, tools of the devil, blah blah blah.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  12. Jar Jar by mk1024 · · Score: 1

    I'm envisioning crates of unsold Jar Jar Binks action figurines... Oh! me so lonely!

    Cool site!

    1. Re:Jar Jar by Mighty+Zontar · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Jar Jar by Kenneth · · Score: 2

      Am I the only person who like Jar-Jar from TPM?

      Probably. Even the three year olds from my mother's day-care class hated Jar-Jar. So much for Jar-Jar's alleged appeal to children.

      --
      There is a civil war coming in the United States. Remember which side has most of the guns
  13. So... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


    ...are they cutting back on the marketing because it turns the traditional SW fans off, or because they didn't sell as much as they expected to last time?

    Sounds like he's trying to spin a marketing problem as if it were a nod to his critics. We could get that pap from Bill Gates if we wanted it.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:So... by inerte · · Score: 1

      I hate to be repetitive, but you are right. Like when we had to see Celine Dion everywhere when Titanic was released.

      If TFM was a commercial blockbuster like they were expecting, no matter what the "fans" had to say, AotC would get plenty of merchandising.

      Nobody modifies a winning product, without risk. Maybe Lucas knew this risk, maybe he didn't see it all. But it's not working...

    2. Re:So... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      are they cutting back on the marketing because it turns the traditional SW fans off

      What "cutting back on the marketing"? I was at the grocery store yesterday and I saw a stack of boxes of "Star Wars Episode II" cereal. I kid you not.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That MSNBC article was spin spin spin. OK, so they didn't sell any of the last batch of crap. In fact the movie scared away customers from Taco Bell. We found a secret memo with Lucas begging Hasbro to keep the contract.

      SO ... Lucas decided to cut the merchandising to preserve quality. Right that's it. OK.

    4. Re:So... by weatherbee · · Score: 1
      If TFM was a commercial blockbuster

      TFM...

      The Fandom Menace

  14. perhaps a source of... by overbom · · Score: 2, Funny


    a new hope?

    sorry :-)

  15. Good one, George by W2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nice to see that Mr. Lucas realizes what a mess Episode One became - hopefully, this will mean a major improvement, both story- and character-wise, for Episode Two. Good for George, good for us, maybe some seven-year olds who never saw the originals will be disappointed that the film now lacks anyone they can identify with, but what the heck, I don't care.

    The article (at MSNBC) does spoil some of the story but also sheds some interesting light. I don't think we can bet on Anakin killing Jar Jar for us just yet, though the co-writer, Jonathan Hales, promises no silly characters or kids. Personally, I expect Jar Jar to get screen time in Ep 2 as Natalie Portman's boobs, meaning a few seconds at most.

    --
    Quality, performance, value; you get only two, and you don't always get to pick.
    1. Re:Good one, George by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idea for a poll:

      Attack of the clones:

      - will suck because Jar Jar lives
      - will suck because it's a chick flick
      - will be cool because it's Star Wars (I even have the "Luke, I am your father" boxers)
      - can't be worse than The Phantom menace
      - should star Bruce Campbell as a jedi
      - Jar Jar must die
      - should have the force glue Cowboy Neal and Jar Jar Binks together

    2. Re:Good one, George by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I expect Jar Jar to get screen time in Ep 2 as Natalie Portman's boobs, meaning a few seconds at most.

      hell i'd sit through 60 minutes of Jar Jar just to see that! :-P

  16. You're wrong. by diverman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, I can't really say for sure, but from interviews I've seen with various people involved with the film, as well as rumors this one is supposed to have a LOT more action, and be fairly dark.

    I'm sure they'll play up the the romance a bit, but from what I understand it's PACKED with Jedi fighting. One rumor is that we find out why Yoda is the bad-ass he's supposed to be. Crossing my fingers to see some kick-ass Jedi fighting. I just hope I'm not let down like with the first one. *sigh*

    Also, if it follows the basic trend from the first 3, The first one is more light hearted, introducing characters. The second one is dark, and deepens the plot. The third one will release the darkness, but show the light at the end of the tunnel. *shrug*

    Just my thoughts, and what I've heard.

    -Alex

    1. Re:You're wrong. by drik00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> Also, if it follows the basic trend from the first 3, The first one is more light hearted, introducing characters. The second one is dark, and deepens the plot. The third one will release the darkness, but show the light at the end of the tunnel. *shrug* <<

      Actually, Lucas has said it will be a bit different, analogous, but different. If I remember correctly, before Ep I even came out, Lucas said that Ep I would be more like Return of the Jedi, Ep II would be more like A New Hope, and Ep III would be the darkest, which would hold the fall of Anakin into the Vader persona, just as Empire was the darkest of the original three. It does seem to be following that pattern, and btw, all these posters need to actually READ the article before posting...the /. article was about a comment by Lucas, not the movie itself...

      yeah.

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    2. Re:You're wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it follows the basic trend from the first 3, The first one is more light hearted, introducing characters. The second one is dark, and deepens the plot. The third one will release the darkness, but show the light at the end of the tunnel. *shrug*

      Time had a lot about SW last week (mild to medium spoilers). In the interview there, Lucas says he's concerned that people will be upset by the third one because it is so dark.

  17. JAR JAR DIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blah! jar jar binks..nuf . JAR JAR OWNZ everyone knows that. messa thinka--- heh..yeah right.. cannot sense any sarcasm here

    sumbody- sumone

  18. Last time by SquadBoy · · Score: 2

    I looked at all the new trailers bought toys the day they came out had read the book and comic book several times before the movie came out. This time I'm ignoring all of the marketing in the hope that having some surprises will help make this one seem better. I'm just wondering if anyone else is doing this and/or what you all think about this.

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    1. Re: Last time by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > 'm just wondering if anyone else is doing this and/or what you all think about this.

      I'm not even going to go see it until I hear what my friends have to say about it. I have a low tolerance for crappy movies.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Last time by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      I went into Teh Phantmo Menice knowing nothing about it at all. I ignored the hype. I didn't buy the action figures. I didn't read the book, or the comics. I didn't go to movies I didn't like just to see the trailer.

      My impression of Teh Phatnom Meanice? Pices of shit. Surprise and ignorance did nothing to make the movie better in any way.

      I doubt very much it will help with Attakc Fo Teh Clownz, but you're free to do as you wish.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    3. Re:Last time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wondering if it has occured to you that you are a fish on a hook. And who's fault would that be, by the way?

    4. Re:Last time by dswensen · · Score: 2

      I don't watch television, so I haven't been seeing any commercials or anything. I saw the comic book on the shelf, but didn't pick it up, or even thumb through it. I've downloaded the trailers (though not all of them) and watched them several times.

      Ironically, most of what I know about the movie is from spoilers that I ran across here on Slashdot or other sites, and didn't look away fast enough. I've already had quite a few surprises spoiled for me, which is a bummer. So far, I've been much happier not knowing the movie back-to-front before its release.

    5. Re:Last time by Jungleland · · Score: 1

      >bought toys .....read the book and comic book
      Geez, how old are you? :-)
      On a more serious note, I ignored the hype with ep1 have only seen it on VHS a couple of times, thought the movie OK but no more than that. If I had bought into all the hype and queued up overnight to see the movie I would have been extremely disappointed.
      The moral to this story? missing all the hype will lower your level of expectations but will not make it a better movie.

  19. Can we trust Lucas? by NickRob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love the Star Wars movies with a great passion, but Lucas is, basically, a consumer whore. How many revisions of Luke in Hoth gear are there? How many Nein Numb and Momaw Nadon action figures are there? If you get .02 seconds of screen time you get 5 action figures, a T-shirt and a mug. There's even a Darth Vader Beer Stein for cryin' out loud!

    I'll believe it when I see it... But right now, I'm believe that Toy stores everywhere are getting container shipments full of insignifigant characters.

    1. Re: Can we trust Lucas? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny


      > There's even a Darth Vader Beer Stein for cryin' out loud!

      Real vaders quaff their brew out of their helmets.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by ag3n7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      A Darth Vader Beer stein??? Where? It'll look GREAT next to my Yoda hookah!!!

    3. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by Glytch · · Score: 2

      This is how George Lucas stays in business. Would you rather he be answerable to a panel of shareholders?

    4. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by aarku · · Score: 1
      How many revisions of Luke in Hoth gear are there? How many Nein Numb and Momaw Nadon action figures are there?

      And its kids like you who own multiple copies of every Star Wars memorabilia on Earth that coerce these companies to keep on making this garbage.

      -rq

    5. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by aarku · · Score: 2, Informative
      "The last movie did not live up to expectations," writes Lucas in a pitch memo to toy maker Hasbro--one of the key Star Wars merchandisers--obtained by Newsweek

      Uhmm... is he saying the movie itself didn't live up to expectations or the toy sales didn't. This quote seems to be out of context...

      =rq

    6. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by grahams · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry, but it is impossible to get .02 seconds of screen time. The smallest amount of screen time that is possible is .042 seconds ((1 second)/(24 fps) = .042).

      =)

    7. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a half of each frame is black while the shutter is spinning.

    8. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was so commercial that when the movie stank, so did all the product promotions. The companies that made all the toys and jar jar binks toilet cleaners lost some major dollars.

      Now Lucas spins a huge drop in companies wanting to buy into part two as him 'cutting back' on the merchandising. That is some major BS. Nobody wants to be associated with another sterile space bomb.

      His real fear is that Spiderman is going to pound clones at the box office.

    9. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take Kirsten Dunst in a wet t-shirt over stupid alien antics any day :)

    10. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      If supplying a demand makes one a whore, then we're all whores.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    11. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by anderman · · Score: 1

      He is, they are called movie goers. If he blows this one he can kiss the third one goodbye.

    12. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by the+gnat · · Score: 2

      I really want an R2D2 bong.

    13. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by British · · Score: 2

      This is true, indeed. I wouldn't be surprised if an extra gets their own series of novels.

      Not to nitpick, but Nien Nub was a mail-in promo offer 20 years ago, and I NEVER GOT MINE! :(

    14. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      I caught Lucas putting R2-D2's in the package backwards just to raise the price for his action figures!

    15. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by kubrick · · Score: 2

      If it means less boy-bands in his films, yes.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    16. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Only if we charge money for it.

      If we don't, does that make us sluts? :&

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    17. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by Cally · · Score: 2
      What I don't understand is why anyone would buy ANY of the merchandise, except as gifts for children. And any kid that gets more than a couple of the figures is going to be a spoilt little bastard. /manufactured/ memorabilia ISN'T memorobilia... surely? like, costumes worn in the films, the landspeeder models used in the first film, a tuskan raider's Big Pointy Stick, a rug made from genuine Ewok: /these/ would be memorabilia.

      I dunno, mebbe I'm getting old.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    18. Re:Can we trust Lucas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There'll be a cheezy hour long series or a saturday morning cartoon instead of episodes 7-9, then there'll be a remake in 2030 of kinda like Planet of the Apes

  20. Will Episodes 7-9 Ever be made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I know George Lucas has repeatedly said that Episodes 7-9 will never be made, but is this realistic? I know old man Lucas will be 61 when Episode 3 comes out, and maybe he will be too old to direct movies at that age, or will he? Since it takes 3 yrs. to make a Star Wars movie, he could still be a relatively young 70 yrs. old when Episode 9 debuts in theaters, if he stays on track with the production schedule.

    Even if Lucas cant or wont direct Episodes 7-9, will he allow some other director to make them and complete the triple trilogy?

    From a financial standpoint, I see Episodes 7-9 being made. Given the phenomenal success of 4 Star Wars movies so far, I think it's impossible to deny the box office goldmine that of the Star Wars franchise.....

    1. Re:Will Episodes 7-9 Ever be made? by BacOs · · Score: 1

      Lucas has directed Episodes One, Two, and Four, but not Episode Five and Episode Six so there is the possibility that other directors could direct Episodes 7-9.

    2. Re:Will Episodes 7-9 Ever be made? by dlb · · Score: 1

      ...and you're assuming of course that there WILL be an episode 7-9.

    3. Re:Will Episodes 7-9 Ever be made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      already written yo

    4. Re:Will Episodes 7-9 Ever be made? by BitterOak · · Score: 2, Informative
      Way, way back, when the first Star Wars movie was playing, Lucas originally planned a total of nine movies. He'd make the middle three first, then the others.

      However, when writing "Return of the Jedi", it was becoming clear that he could really finish up everything in episode six and there wouldn't be any need for episodes 7-9. (He originally planned for the death of the Emperor and redemption of Annakin Skywalker in episode 9.)

      If I recall correctly, it was this drastic change in plans that led to the dispute between George Lucas and Gary Kurtz, and why Gary Kurtz didn't stick around for episode 6. I'm not sure if this is a rumor, or fact.

      But after Jedi, I don't think there were any plans for any episodes 7-9.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  21. Jar Jar to be a Jedi! by diverman · · Score: 1

    I hear they're making him a Jedi!!!

    OMG!

    *evilgrin*

    -Alex

  22. Still too many Dollys running around by Shriek · · Score: 1

    "To avoid a disastrous repeat, the 57-year-old filmmaker says he's cutting down the licensees by two-thirds for Clones"

    Still too many Dollys in sci-fi costumes running around...

    1. Re:Still too many Dollys running around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the licensees dropped in number by 2/3 after being burned by episode 1. OTOH hang onto those jarjar figures because down the road your kids might be able to sell them for high prices on account of rarity (the balance being in landfills).

  23. Rip all you like, he'll make more. by bziman · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Okay, everyone's ripping on Lucas, and perhaps rightfully so. On the other hand, maybe he does realize that he messed up.

    Either way... I'm going to see Clones. It'd have to be really bad for me not to go back two or three times.

    How about the rest of you? Vocal though you are, I doubt you will stay away. It doesn't matter how bad the dialogue is... guys with lightsabers are just too cool.

    1. Re:Rip all you like, he'll make more. by sphealey · · Score: 2
      Okay, everyone's ripping on Lucas, and perhaps rightfully so. On the other hand, maybe he does realize that he messed up.
      Yeah, he realizes he messed up because his licensing cut was down. Not because he damaged a great story.

      That said, I actually thing TPM could be made acceptable by editing out sPh

    2. Re:Rip all you like, he'll make more. by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      I will not be going to see it opening weekend. If I hear it's better than the The Phantom "Screw You Out Of Your Hard Earned Dollars Faster Than a Vegas Hooker" Menace than perhaps I'll cough up the $9.50 for a movie ticket.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
  24. My thoughts.. by PimpNinjaWannaBee · · Score: 0

    Since Episode I/Jar Jar Binks my instant reaction when hearing the words Star, Merchandise and Wars is: sell crazy someplace else, we're all stacked up here.

    Hmmmp..suck my sig.

  25. Revisiting TPM by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After the DVD came out, I had the chance to revisit Episode one. It's strange, that when you strip away all the hype, the product tie-ins, the in your face constant advertising, and just go see the movie on it's own merits, it's not really all that bad.

    And, for some strange reason, it seems to get better every time you watch it. You notice more of the details and craftsmenship that went into the movie.

    Finally, if you can go into the film knowing the annoying parts (Jar-Jar, the announcers at the pod race et.al), you can pretty much tune them out.

    When it's all said and done, the hype surrounding TPM hurt it more then the bad filmaking... which shows how media can so dramatically effect our expectations. The article mentions 'The Matrix'.. which I knew nothing about, and was blown away when I first saw it. But the more times I see it, the more it's luster wears off... it actually looses appeal every time I watch it, while TPM, strangly, seems to get better.

    So Kudos to lucas for entering into this a little wiser. I don't think you're going to see nearly as many fanatic star wars geeks lining up for months in order to see this movie, you are'nt going to be pounded for weeks on end for advertisments for product tie ins... and in the end when we do go down to the theatre (and we will.. you know it) our expectations will have the chance to be a little more realistic.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:Revisiting TPM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But will Lucas atone in the only way that will be forgiven? Making a cut of the Phantom Menace without those annoying parts? Maybe redoing the Jar Jar Binks vocals and actions to be more adult (what a piss poor replacement for Chewbacca!) and mature and less annoying, less scenes with Jar Jar in, etc. More big spaceships are needed - and more coverage of them. Who is still not impressed by the opening scenes of the original Star Wars? The weapons in the battles are gay, stupid blue bouncing balls? Replace them with lasers and missiles and shit - shouldn't be hard considering the whole battle was CG.

    2. Re:Revisiting TPM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't watching the Pahntom Menace more than 3 times like listening to a bad song on the radio. Even though it's bad it'll stick in your head for the next hour.

      Brainwashing :-)

    3. Re:Revisiting TPM by selectspec · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's strange, that when you strip away all the hype, the product tie-ins, the in your face constant advertising, and just go see the movie on it's own merits, it's not really all that bad...

      ... it's worse.

      --

      Someone you trust is one of us.

    4. Re:Revisiting TPM by mattbelcher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll risk the wrath of the Jar-Jar-haters out there by agreeing with you. Part of the appeal of the old films for me is that I know the stories so well that when I watch them my mind is free to notice all the little details that go into a well-crafted film. The campy fades, the random background creatures, etc. The Phantom Menace is really no different. After repeated viewings, I became aware of those same qualities. For example, Jar-Jar's idiocy is a perfect foil for Qui-Gon's serenity. Once I got past his annoying antics, I see him for the purpose he played in the characterization of the Jedi.

      --

      Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

    5. Re:Revisiting TPM by Kallahar · · Score: 2

      Then again, maybe your brain is slowly dying. :)

      I just find EP1 boring, even the first time in the theater I simply didn't care one way or the other what happened to the characters...

      Travis

    6. Re:Revisiting TPM by Dukrous · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, the movie isn't as bad as people claim it to be. However, it's not even Jedi good as far as the trilogy goes.

      In STAR WARS, you had a director who was (for all intents and purposes) new and idealistic. He wanted to make a sci-fi movie in the vein of the old Buck Rogers serialized films, but wanted to have some sort of timeless quality. He achived this...STAR WARS is a grand fairy tale that reminds us of brave knights storming a castle to rescue the princess from the evil wizard. If course, it's a little deeper than that, and he did it admirably, albeit you can see it's a very rookie effort.

      EMPIRE is, in my opinion, one of the best movies ever made. It's exciting, thrilling, and deep. The universe really opens up and we see the simple struggles for what they are. We see a change in relationships that shifts the entire spectrum. And most of all, it introduced the idea of a puppet that acts. Say what you want, Yoda in EMPIRE acts. It's a tiny, silly puppet that looks real, conveys emotion, and convinces you in one sentence that this is one powerful figure in the universe. I hate Ep1 Yoda...he looks fake and plastic and completely flies in the face of EMPIRE's work.

      JEDI...good movie. Uses half of act 2 and all of act 3 for action. Bold decision that paid out. Great battles that ended the series (New Jedi Order fighting Empire remnants?...WTF was the death of the Emperor, a speed bump for the Empire?!). However, we had Ewoks...a marketing ploy. I think this movie might have been better than EMPIRE if Lucas got to do his Wookiee slave camp.

      MENACE...ugh. A good movie, compared to other crap (Stop Or My Mom Will Shoot! vs Episode 1, anyone?), but utter crap compared to what came before.

      And I have little faith in CLONES. I read the adaptation, and it's exciting and well plotted. But I've seen the trailers...Christensen looks and sounds wooden. I hope he's not. Portman is misused again into a unidimensional role. And there's a couple continuity gaffs I won't mention but will be brought up after release.

      Oh, how I hope I'm wrong...cause if Episode 3 sucks, the entire series will fall flat. Episode 3 cannot suck...it has to be dark, brooding, deeply philosophical, and light on action. The turning of Anakin to Vader is not an action sequence for crying out loud!

    7. Re:Revisiting TPM by matthewd · · Score: 1

      The other interesting thing to see is how TPM stacks up after viewing Eps 2 & 3. After viewing these, will some of the decisions made in TPM to set up the other movies start to make sense?

      Personally I can excuse Jar Jar, but the ending of the film has some flaws. Too much dumb luck, between Anakin blowing up the droid control ship and Jar Jar escaping the battle without a scratch. Wonderful lightsaber duel, no doubt one of the best things about the movie, but no verbal sparing like we've seen in eps. 4-6. Maul was definately underused. Perhaps if Lucas had brought another screenwriter in on TPM it might have had a more meaningful, dramatic ending that didn't depend on dumb luck.

    8. Re:Revisiting TPM by Illserve · · Score: 2

      Nope, it's worse. Recently got ahold of the DVD and started watching it at home and gave up halfway through (I've seen it twice in theaters). It was about the time I hit the Jedi council that I remembered how truly pitiful this movie is. They just don't grip me, or allow me to see past the bad acting on the part of all of them, especially Yoda (yes I know it's not a person, but it's still worse than the puppet of Empire and Jedi).

      Episodes 4-6 are not like this at all, put them in the machine and I'm occupied for 2 hours.

      It's crap, expensive and well polished crap, but crap nontheless, flawed in acting, character choice, script and plot.

    9. Re: Revisiting TPM by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Insightful


      > Once I got past his annoying antics

      Remind us again why we should have to get past annoying antics before we can enjoy a movie?

      The goal isn't to learn to love a movie despite its faults. The goal is to go see movies that have minimal faults to begin with.

      Lucas is making that progressively more difficult. Does that mean we need to grind our teeth harder so we can 'enjoy' it? Or does that mean we need to go see some other movie instead?

      The thread re GeekPAC is relevant here. We should stay away from EII in droves, and make it known in advance that we're going to. That would get Lucas' attention.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    10. Re:Revisiting TPM by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      "Episode 3 cannot suck...it has to be dark, brooding, deeply philosophical, and light on action"

      But you know as well as I do that it won't be. The only thing that can save us now is the rest of the LOTR films. Thank gawd for that my friend.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    11. Re:Revisiting TPM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right --- the new Anakin is very wooden. It must be to match the utter lack of personality that the young Anakin had.

    12. Re:Revisiting TPM by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      I was flipping through Phantom Menace the other day, and I'd have to agree with you. It wasn't as bad as I remembered it being after seeing it in the theater.

      It still didn't seem that great, but it was watchable, at least. I think you're right- peoples' huge expectations definitely hurt their enjoyment of Phantom Menace.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    13. Re:Revisiting TPM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you sleep thru your Psychology lectures in college or what?

      Your mind always goes for the long-winded reasoning that makes any experience fit a bigger notions that you hold onto.

    14. Re:Revisiting TPM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maul was definately underused.

      A Maul-clone will be back in espisode 3.

    15. Re:Revisiting TPM by (void*) · · Score: 2

      Thank you for giving good reasons for liking TPM. You see, the people complaining about TPM are complaining about the weak plot and bad acting. And in those terms, TPM is worse tham Episode 4-6. But TPM does have that incredible detail that a CGI movie should have, and for noticing that, and having a different viewpoint than the rest of the slashdot crowd - Thank you.

    16. Re:Revisiting TPM by Maserati · · Score: 1

      JEDI... CGI has now advanced to the point where it might even be economical to re-make Jedi with Wookies instead of Ewoks. It's a lot of good animating and a lot of good editing work. Emphasis on a lot. And good writing, lets not forget that. Economical ornot, it's still worth doing. Rveenge of the Jedi anyone ?

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    17. Re:Revisiting TPM by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I've noticed that the last star wars film always seems to be the "worst one ever" until a few years go by. Hell, I remember when Empire came out, people were whining that it was a bad sequel and tarnished the original film, blah blah. Now many feel it's the strongest of the four. Similarly with Jedi, the Ewok backlash was huge.

      Give it time, although I would put phantom menace at the bottom of the pile (slightly trailing Jedi) it's still a good enough flick that I'll fire it up on the occasional Sunday morning and watch it through.

    18. Re:Revisiting TPM by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 2
      ..you are'nt going to be pounded for weeks on end for advertisments

      Need I remind you: there were _advertisements_ hyping the _trailer_ (which was, of course, brought to you by Pepsi).

      In other words, I'll believe it when I see it (which _won't_ be after waiting in line in desperate anticipation).

      --
      Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
    19. Re:Revisiting TPM by smeng · · Score: 1

      Don't think I could agree on 'The Matrix'. I thought it was really great. Like you, I went into the cinema knewing nothing about the story. In fact, I flew in to New York from London with some friends. And on the first night we were there, we went to watch Phantom Menace. Credits rolled up, crowd clapped their hands and cheered. But as the show began, somehow, the appeal never caught on. There were too many annoying elements and something else was missing. Well, thought maybe it was because I was tired or something. So watched it again, and again and nothing. I felt nothing. On the other hand, the same week I went to New York, we watched Matrix the next night and man, I was blown away by it. Terrible similar to a typical anime storyline but it was cool. And I watched it quite a few times after that and it was still cool as you start understanding the storyline better and noticing the little things. Star Wars Eps IV-VI had its flaws but I loved them. And like most people, ESB was my favourite. I supposed people who watched it then didn't like the fact that they were left hanging like that and the fact that Han Solo was frozen in carbonite at the end. I heard the same comments about Lord of the Rings. Some people didn't really like it as much just because they didn't like the story ending like that - especially people who never knew about the books! TPM never made me fall in love with the story or the characters. I couldn't appreciate the young Obi-Wan, and even Yoda. It just wasn't great and didn't feel Star Wars. I supposed if the previous trilogy never existed, this film might have felt OK because there's nothing to compare it to. On it's own, it wouldn't be a hit, it would have been OK. I just hope that the second movie does get better - at least it's more commercialistic.

    20. Re:Revisiting TPM by smeng · · Score: 1

      Meant less commercialistic sorry - should learn to edit what I write before posting next time. *sweatdrop*

    21. Re:Revisiting TPM by mgblst · · Score: 2

      Episodes 4-6 are not like this at all, put them in the machine and I'm occupied for 2 hours.

      Episodes 4-6 go for about 6 hours... so what exactly are you trying to say?

    22. Re:Revisiting TPM by nalfeshnee · · Score: 1

      re:

      "But the more times I see [the Matrix], the more it's luster wears off... it actually looses appeal every time I watch it, while TPM, strangly, seems to get better."

      you, sir, are weird.

      --

      -- Despair is an operating system that ANY human being can run, sort of a psychological JAVA --

    23. Re:Revisiting TPM by mizhi · · Score: 2

      "After the DVD came out, I had the chance to revisit Episode one. It's strange, that when you strip away all the hype, the product tie-ins, the in your face constant advertising, and just go see the movie on it's own merits, it's not really all that bad."

      I never saw it in the theatres, I saw it a year after all the hubub... and I remember thinking then "I wonder why everyone thought this was so bad?" Then I watched it again about 6 months later and I remember thinking, "OMG, this sucks ass! What was I smoking before?"

      Unlike cheese, wine, and episodes 4,5,6; 1 does not age well.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    24. Re: Revisiting TPM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if we stay away in droves and EII is actually a good movie? What kind of message does that send?

    25. Re:Revisiting TPM by Sabu+mark · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I've noticed that the last star wars film always seems to be the "worst one ever" until a few years go by.

      Maybe you notice that because it's TRUE.

      Episode 6 WAS the worst of the three, and Episode 1 IS the worst of the four.

      --

      What Would Jesus Do
      (for a Klondike bar)?
    26. Re:Revisiting TPM by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 1

      that works, except you're forgetting the period '81 - '83 when empire was the worst of the two, which it clearly is not.

    27. Re:Revisiting TPM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it's all said and done, the hype surrounding TPM hurt it more then the bad filmaking... which shows how media can so dramatically effect our expectations. The article mentions 'The Matrix'.. which I knew nothing about, and was blown away when I first saw it.

      I went and watched tPM without knowing a thing about it in advance. I was seriously disappointed. After I read your first comment, I thought about replying with some crack about lack of taste and dorks who liked the Matrix, then I read the following paragraphs. I guess I hit the nail on the head with that one.

    28. Re:Revisiting TPM by syusuf · · Score: 1


      You notice more of the details

      Like the scene where Anakin is working on the pod racer with all the other children around, one of the girls has braces on her teeth :) Mabye slave kids are covered by the Hutt Medical Fund ...

    29. Re: Revisiting TPM by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > But what if we stay away in droves and EII is actually a good movie? What kind of message does that send?

      That's why we need to make sure the media (and thus Lucas) known in advance what we're going to do and why we're going to do it. There must be no doubt in his mind about that.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  26. Re:In Case Slashdot Gets Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verrry funny, thank you very much.

  27. This could be a plus by sc_demandred · · Score: 1
    If Lucas is not just feeding us a line of pap (go ahead, call me naiive, I am), this could actually bode very well for fans who were abused by the crappy dialogue ("Yippee!", anyone?), concept-rape (Midichlorians, anyone?), and marketing to the nickelodeon crowd ("I don't care what galaxy you're from, that's gotta hurt!").

    Plus, it's got nat port in filmy, backless dresses! This could be the most titillating moment in the SW universe since Leia and the Chain-mail bikini!

    --

    The hooligans are loose! The hooligans are loose! What if they become ruffians? -- Bill Hicks

    1. Re:This could be a plus by Dr.+Stephan+Aspridis · · Score: 1

      Gato, you're _so_ right... 8-)

    2. Re:This could be a plus by ngc1365 · · Score: 1

      i thought he said, "i don't care what universe you're from, that's gotta hurt!" ..which was lame and would've even made that line better if he (them?) had said galaxy or planet or system. bah.

    3. Re:This could be a plus by TheGeneration · · Score: 1

      You know... it's funny. In one breath many of you are like, "He makes these films so trivial." And in the next your practically asking for Baywatch like casting (ie, nothing but a body without acting skills). Make up your minds. Do you want a good story, or do you want flim-flam?

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
  28. too much to live up to by PhilJackson · · Score: 1

    It has so much to live up to, I know for a fact that if I hadn't seen the (first/last) three episodes epesode 1 would be one of my fave films this year!

    1. Re:too much to live up to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Don't feel bad for lucas. It was the second most
      profitable movie in history, and I don't even
      know if that include merchandise.

  29. Ah, but it's HOW you return it... by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    "IS JAR JAR BINKS GOING TO EVER POKE HIS UGLY MUG ON SCREEN AGAIN? because if so I am returning my light saber."

    So am I.
    Direct to Georgieboy.
    Rectally. (Oh, for a _real_ one!) ;>

  30. The changing nature of movies in mass culture by SetarconeX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think one of the main problems Lucas is running up against is the fact that single movies don't exert the influence on mass culture they once did. Simply put, for quite some time now there has been a lack of big movies that "everyone" goes to see. This is not exactly a bad thing, it just shows that movies are differently targeted.

    For example, if you ask me, there's been a distinct increase in the quality of war movies over the past decade, even though less people are going to see them. Saving Private Ryan wasn't for everyone, but I think most would agree it was at least a better movie than Force 10 from Navarone.

    To get back to Star Wars though, I really think a big part of the problem with Episode I was the attempt to appeal to a wide audience. Keeping away from flaming comments about commercialism, the objective should not be to make a movie EVERYONE likes, but to make a movie every will agree was not a waste of time, even if it wasn't their cup of tea.

    Debate me if you will, but I see Empire Strikes Back in this vein. A bit darker then the other movies, but bad? No. It was different, and it was good. Did everyone like it? No again, but few claim to outright hate the movie. It was quality filmmaking, not churned out sludge for mass appeal.

    --
    "Isn't that the sweetest little well-balanced undergraduate-level philosophy of life."
    1. Re:The changing nature of movies in mass culture by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      Simply put, for quite some time now there has been a lack of big movies that "everyone" goes to see. This is not exactly a bad thing, it just shows that movies are differently targeted.


      I think video causes a lot of that. 20 years ago, if everyone was talking about a movie, you'd go see it. Today, it's common to hear 'Well, I'll check it out when it comes to video'.

      I remember going to see movies three or four times while it was in the theatre, because a good movie could stick around for over 6 months. That rarely happens anymore.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:The changing nature of movies in mass culture by joekool · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Saving Private Ryan was better than Force 10, but was it better than The Big Red One? Was it better than Battle of the Bulge? Of course not! As it is, it always was, and as it was, it always will be.

      --

      Slackware: old school feel, new school gear.
    3. Re:The changing nature of movies in mass culture by hashashin · · Score: 1
      I see Empire Strikes Back in this vein. A bit darker then the other movies, but bad? No. It was different, and it was good. Did everyone like it? No again, but few claim to outright hate the movie.

      Actually, Empire's my favorite episode, and it's also got 52% of the vote on the linked MSNBC article, so I'm actually in the majority on that opinion, for once.
    4. Re:The changing nature of movies in mass culture by SetarconeX · · Score: 1

      I actually voted for Empire in that poll (and yea, I feel guilty about sometimes using MSNBC too), but that 52% kinda surprised me.

      I kinda smell some flames coming, but doesn't anyone else wonder why the the one voted best wasn't directed by Lucas? While I'm at it, didn't it make the least money of the 1st 3 movies? Why is that?

      Or, maybe I'm spending way too much time thinking about Star Wars.

      --
      "Isn't that the sweetest little well-balanced undergraduate-level philosophy of life."
  31. Why is George Lucas directing Episode I and II ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He only directed Episode 4 and then let others direct The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi.

    So why is he directing the prequels?

  32. Please say it ain't so!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know someone else out there has already downloaded the soundtrack.

    Please listen to the Zam Wessel track.

    Please tell me that is not an *electric fucking guitar* I hear in the background of a Star Wars song.

    I think I'm gonna cry.

    1. Re:Please say it ain't so!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shit, you're right.

      I hope it's from... I a bar they're passing or something.

    2. Re:Please say it ain't so!!! by Lifewolf · · Score: 1
      Please tell me that is not an *electric fucking guitar* I hear in the background of a Star Wars song.

      Well, they had to do something with these.

      --
      "Be Happy or Die." -- AoN
  33. Lucas doesn't get it by starseeker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read a Time article on this movie, and it is quite clear that Lucas either doesn't understand or doesn't care just how bad Phantom really seemed to the majority of his fans (including me.) He blames the internet for the crushing negative reaction to Jar-Jar, saying that C3PO and the Ewoks also got a lot of negative feedback and the reason those characters weren't so heavly dumped on was there was no internet to spread the word. Incredible.

    I readly confess the Ewoks in particular are weak, but at least they and 3PO weren't so incredibly annoying. Jar-Jar should have been cut out completely once the fan response became clear, whatever Lucas may think about the reasons for the reaction. He states he is in the business to make money - why then doesn't he listen to his customers?? Is the man's ego really that much out of control?

    I may see Clones, but I suspect unless the critics rave about it I'll wait for it to reach the dollar movie theaters first. Lucas got more money than he earned for Phantom, and I see no reason to give him more. He needs to wake up to the fact that hype will only carry him so far, and eventually he's going to have to produce a good product again.

    --
    "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
    1. Re:Lucas doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucas either doesn't understand or doesn't care

      It's the latter. He doesn't have to care. He knows whatever he does will be lapped up by the masses, no matter what it is.

      why then doesn't he listen to his customers??

      Look around you. Read the posts in this thread. His customers are drooling, sleepwalking fanboys who will gladly consume ANYTHING that Lucas produces. It's hard to respect someone who has no self respect to begin with.

      Mod me down, but deep down, you know it's true.

    2. Re:Lucas doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a midnight screening of the original trilogy back around 1990 in Philadelphia. For Star Wars, every time a new character appeared, there was wild cheering -- even for C3PO (dork that he is). But for the Ewoks? The only cheering they got was when one died.

      It seems like Lucas-world resembles the real world about as much as North Korea does. Kim Jung-Lucas.

      Last month's Salon article about the Star Wars saga was spot on. He should hire a real s/f writer again.

      --Haisan

  34. Time's Lucas article by gad_zuki! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Much nicer and more Lucas-centric piece on Attack of the Clones at time.

    1. Re:Time's Lucas article by Screamer49 · · Score: 1

      "A Gandhi turned Rambo, Yoda is the real action hero of the film."

      Love this quote.

    2. Re:Time's Lucas article by rhetland · · Score: 1


      Time's article is still a bit ass-kissing, in my opinion. The basic thrust of the article is:

      "[We previewed Episode I, and loved it, and it stank. We now preview Episode II, and we love it. This time it won't stink. Really. Trust us. What would we have to gain from a good review?]"

      Bottom line: It's hard to say, not knowin'..

  35. Award nomination by The+Cat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lucasfilm saved its best goodies, though, for the Web geeks, a stratum of "Star Wars" fandom that, in the past, it had communicated with only via cease-and-desist orders.

    Absolutely brilliant line.

  36. Maxim Magazine... by Razor+Sex · · Score: 3, Informative

    The current edition of Maxim has a pretty cool interview with George Lucas that covers a couple pages. Not too many spilers, and it also covers the general direction Lucas is taking it in (as a director and as a story). Some of us might find some cool stuff to look at in the magazine as well...

    1. Re:Maxim Magazine... by __aasfhc1949 · · Score: 1
      You're actually reading the articles in Maxim!

      :)

      Sort of like reading the latest Hustler editorial...

  37. Tons-o-Crap by ELCarlsson · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just imagine an archeological expedition thousands of years from now digging up an old garbage dump and what do they find? Tons of unwanted Episode 1 merchandise. "What a strange idol they worshipped" :Pulls string: "Me'sa tink d'is a ba' idea!" They'll think we're morons.

    1. Re:Tons-o-Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They'll think we're morons

      We are morons, you moron.

    2. Re:Tons-o-Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you read old English? And that doesn't mean Shakespeare. I bet people of 3002 would hear JarJar in the same way we hear old English today.

    3. Re:Tons-o-Crap by pnatural · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unless, of course, the future archeologists are descendants of the French, in which case, they will think Jar Jar is brilliant.

    4. Re:Tons-o-Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unless, of course, the future archeologists are descendants of the French

      Naah, if they're French, they'll be too busy surrendering to someone or another to notice.

    5. Re:Tons-o-Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      It always amazes me how full of themselves americans are... Here we have a totally racist-biased comment and it ends up with a score of 5... Pathetic if you ask me... If TPM was set on contemporary Earth, I'd venture that Jar Jar would definitely be american...

    6. Re:Tons-o-Crap by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Eek. You can find that now in sealed tupperware boxes in my attic!

    7. Re:Tons-o-Crap by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

      Good GOD, the French have put Jerry Lewis on a pedistal! Jar Jar can't be far behind. Also, if it is German Archeologists, the same could be said. Can anyone say David Hasslehoff?

      --

      Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

    8. Re:Tons-o-Crap by chrispy666 · · Score: 1
      Hahahah, I'll just assume you're kidding.

      French Chrispy

      --
      Music is the language of the heart, the sound of the soul. -Joe Satriani
    9. Re:Tons-o-Crap by linzeal · · Score: 1

      You appearently have yet to meet the inhabitants of canada.

    10. Re:Tons-o-Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... Americans have racist-biased comments, but French have racists politicians who score very high in elections.

      What's worse ?

      Could it be possible that banning racist-biased jokes somehow favors far-right politics ? how disturbing such an idea is for some narrow-minded i-know-life-better-than-you leftist people than ran France for the past 20 years.

    11. Re:Tons-o-Crap by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1

      except that in french, it's brillant (also meaning 'shining') not brilliant.

      (btw, you wonder why non-US people think that (some/most) people from the US are small-minded/full of themselves? giving +5 to a post that's incorrect, racist, and certainly flamebait is a big hint).

  38. I won't see Episode 2 by FurryFeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And it's not a boycott. It's the fact that Episode I sucked big time, and last week I was watching Montecristo (great movie) and saw trailers for Attack of the Clones.
    And suddenly it hit me.
    I was planning to watch it, it was pretty much a given. And then, seeing the scenes, I realized I don't really have a wish to see it. I just had a lemming reaction. The hype got to me. I had been brainwashed.
    That is, I was going to watch it because it was a Star Wars film. But nothing I saw on the trailer, and nothing I saw in the prequel, compelled me to see it.
    So, ask yourself: If this film wasn't a "Star Wars" movie, would I be compelled to see it? Would I feel it is a good film?.
    I have decided it's not. And I won't give in to the hype, however alluring it becomes.

    PS: For the opinion or David Brin, great science fiction writer who makes George Lucas look like the hack he is, read this.

    1. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in all fairness to Lucas, David Brin makes most writers look like hacks.

    2. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were all brainwashed. Death to lucas. Death to THX. Death to his no DVD garbage. I pray all the pirates fuck this guy hard,

      Jar jar sucks. EP1 just sucks all around; it is crap when it comes to the real meat and potatoes.

      Have you seen American Graffiti? A real Lucas flick. Star Wars and ESB are so good, and get better and better. This stuff is just shit.

      TPM sucked so bad, it was kiddie Nintenblow universe. I was so pissed, I saw it the first day it came out (and lol to the jerkoff who line up and don't know how to use Moviefone or fandango, hahahha, lol, the jerks in the lineups hahahah)

      I was so pissed i went the movies at 12 at night for that load of crap. I have seen scores of better movies since.

      Star wars and especially ESB set the standards too high for that fat pedophilic Lucas to ever achieve again. The best thing for the SW franchise would be his death so a real director can take a shot at EP3 without screwing it all to hell.

      I call for your DEATH, G. Lucas ! You are a goat ass.

      Seriously, Ill get modded down for saying all this, but its true, and you all know it. EP1 was whoring for cash, cash cowing, garbage. Merchandising like McDonalds happy meals.
      The story sucked, it was full of holes, it was way too short to take on what they took on, and to have Anakin flailing around like a retard and haphazardly winning the battle is LAME LAME. Lucas is a pedophile, btw. He adopts reams of portly and corpulent children, has you seen his adopted kids? He keeps them fat so they feel like crap about themselves and don't have the courage to report his molestations.

      Its no wonder Lucas is divorced. He is a sick pathetic man. He is fat, he is greedy. He needs to die. I hate him for ruining EP1. I pray for his termination. I wish I was Boba Fett with a poop rocket so he would die of e coli.

    3. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I won't give in to the hype, however alluring it becomes.

      Yes, you will.

    4. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2


      And I won't give in to the hype, however alluring it becomes.


      Yes, you will.


      What is that? Jedi mind trick?
    5. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by startled · · Score: 2

      Agreed. Same realization hit me a while back. Some movie about a wonky sci-fi universe with some unendearing young punk and a shitty love story.

      If the reviews are strongly favorable, I'll see it, like I do with many films. Otherwise, screw it. I'll wait for The Two Towers.

    6. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by zCyl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If this film wasn't a "Star Wars" movie,... would I feel it is a good film?

      And if Odysseus was just some dude on a ship, would it be as good of a story? Would Terminator II be as good of a movie without the first one? It's tough to analyze a story out of context.

    7. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Xuff · · Score: 5, Funny

      In my day, we actually saw the movie before deciding weather it was good or not...

      --

      -Xuff
      Homepage & W
    8. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll wait for The Two Towers.

      Sorry, they fell over last September.

    9. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wont PAY to see episode 2 simply because i payed to see the first one - i dont like getting ripped off and so i shall warez this movie and be done with it and then i will give it to all my firends and post it on my website - muwahaha

    10. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by egomaniac · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      And in your day, it probably didn't cost twenty-five bucks for two tickets, some popcorn, and a Coke.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    11. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by unicron · · Score: 0

      It's 8 bucks you cheap bastard, get a job.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    12. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by anderman · · Score: 1

      If Odysseus was just some dude on a ship the story would still be interesting because it is what happens that is interesting. The part of his return would be different but that is at the end.

      Terminator II would be as good without the first one.

    13. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by 3263827 · · Score: 1

      In my day, we learned to spell words properly when composing sentences.

    14. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      At cinema prices, drop the popcorn and coke, and you're down to $10

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    15. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our day was a day without people like Jon Katz, too.

      Because we all KNOW he doesn't actually watch the movies he reviews.

    16. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by sharkey · · Score: 2

      In my day, we actually saw the movie before deciding weather it was good or not...

      Well, this is MY day, and we don't have to go see a movie to decide if the weather is good or bad.

      Try this:
      Look out your window: If it is sunny, and you like sunny days, it's good weather. If you don't like sunny days, it's bad weather. You can apply this simple test to all sorts of weather to check and see if you consider it good or not.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    17. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Xuff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, in my day we weren't anal about spelling...

      *sheds a tear*

      You're a meanie!

      --

      -Xuff
      Homepage & W
    18. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by dswensen · · Score: 2

      It really depends on what you're going to see it for. I don't like Star Wars because it's a deep meditation on human existence, or delivers plots too convoluted for Hercule Poirot himself to unravel.

      I like Star Wars because it has great creatures, space battles, speeder chases, and lightsabers. These are very uncomplicated things which I enjoy seeing, and I'm not in the least ashamed of that. When I feel like an in-depth character study, I'll watch Citizen Kane again. Until then, bring on the damn Clonetroopers.

      If it wasn't a Star Wars movie, it wouldn't have any of these things in it. The thing is, nothing does. There hasn't been a space opera movie made yet (IMHO) that can even begin to hold a candle to Star Wars. Every other movie just rips off Blade Runner instead (more product placement that way). Even The Matrix takes place on Earth, where you can be science-fictiony AND still push the latest Rob Zombie single.

      It's not about hype for me. It's about Star Wars doing what no other film will do.

      And if some other movie took place in a galaxy far, far away, and had great monsters and space battles and lightsabers -- damn tootin' I'd see it. But no one but Lucas seems to make those.

    19. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by BtAFMB · · Score: 1
      In my day, we actually saw the movie before deciding weather it was good or not...

      Wow, it must be nice to have so much free time you can watch the thousands of movies that are made every year. The rest of us have to rely of clumsy methods such as: trailers, the actors and director's previous work, general plot ect. to decide which movies to spend time watching.

      --

      "I have fallen off the wagon, for I am a slave to tea."
    20. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1
      In Germany it costs about 7 Euros to see a movie (German or Original). The price has been steadily increasing over the last few years at least 5% ahead of inflation per year.

      I can understand the complaints and the guys who will save those dollars and d/l it over Kazaa/Gnutella instead. I will see it at the cinema but my regular cinema visits have dropped a lot over the last year.

    21. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Bongo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      PS: For the opinion or David Brin, great science fiction writer who makes George Lucas look like the hack he is, read...

      Some points from that article about what Lucas is having us believe:

      • Elites have an inherent right to arbitrary rule; common citizens needn't be consulted. They may only choose which elite to follow.
      • "Good" elites should act on their subjective whims, without evidence, argument or accountability.
      • Any amount of sin can be forgiven if you are important enough.
      • True leaders are born. It's genetic. The right to rule is inherited.
      • Justified human emotions can turn a good person evil.

      But hey, I think all these points could apply to Buffy.

      I recall seeing a TV interview with Lucas where he says that he saw there was a lack of simple good v. evil morality in films... or words to that effect, and that he wanted to put myths back into films.

      It's a question of whether myths have any value, at least for children. And that question might be better answered by people who study child development.

      The myth of the hero, of the super-man, might be nice as something to inspire one, although dangerous to actually identify with it. Elites are not in and of themselves bad, after all, in sport we want to watch the elite players, the ones who are the very best, and not just the average joe.

      The Matrix not only had it's own hero myths, with Neo as the saviour of the world, but also lots of esoteric stuff, about the world being just a dream, and so on.

      Not that I particularly liked SW.

    22. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 4, Insightful
      One thing I really like is that, according to the Time article (and written SW publications?) the Empire doesn't come and attack the Republic. The Empire IS the Republic.

      As an American trudging through 2002 I seriously like the idea that Lucas is using the mass media to put forth THIS idea for people to think about: that the well intentioned Republic can turn into the Empire through expansion, greed and expediency.

      With any kind of luck WE won't have storm troopers by the time the sixth film is out...

    23. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by NewWazoo · · Score: 1

      "Would Terminator II be as good of a movie without the first one?"

      Uh, Yup. :-)

      I'm 19, and TII was the first R-rated movie I ever saw. I've never seen Terminator, and don't think I ever will... but I LOVE Terminator II.

      So yes.

      Brandon

    24. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by FurryFeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dude, the sole fact that you're comparing Star Wars to the Odyssey kinda makes my point...
      Odysseus WAS some dude on a ship. Things happened to him, and it is a good story. Probably what you mean is "if th Odyssey wasn't one of the classics of literature, would you think it was a good story?".
      The thing is, that thinking is backwards. The Odyssey is a classic BECAUSE it is that good. You see, Homer (he composed it) didn't have much of a marketing budget, so his works were preserved solely on merit.
      Now, Star Wars is not rally bad, but it is not as good as they would have you believe. The difference is hype. And if you don't think Star Wars is about hype, well, I don't really know what to say to you, because it is pretty obvious to me...

    25. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 3, Informative

      One thing I really like is that, according to the Time article (and written SW publications?) the Empire doesn't come and attack the Republic. The Empire IS the Republic.
      As an American trudging through 2002 I seriously like the idea that Lucas is using the mass media to put forth THIS idea for people to think about: that the well intentioned Republic can turn into the Empire through expansion, greed and expediency.


      And here I thought he was just translating the history of the Roman Republic/Empire into space opera... considering that the politics in TPM look just like late Roman Republic politics, and that they've got the exact same corruption and abuses that led to the fall of the Roman Republic. Unfortunately, I don't think Palpatine is going to be a Julius Caesar... more like a Tiberius or Diocletian.

      --
      ---dragoness
    26. Re:I won't see Episode 2 by daeley · · Score: 2

      Obi-Wan [waving hand]: These are the prequels you're looking for.

      Trooper: These are the prequels we're looking for.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  39. He's got one chance with me. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2

    Ok, let's recap.

    Second to last movie: Ewoks.

    Last movie: Jar Jar Binks.

    Right now, he has one last chance with me. Two chances if he releases the first three movies on DVD ABOUT FIVE MINUTES AGO.

    The sad part about it is that as member in good standing with his target demographic, I feel no urge to cruise his websites looking for "new info."

    For all of you people that aren't Star Wars fans and wonder if we're really that P.O'd about tPM, well, we are. After all, I own ALL of the action figures from the first movies, and I really don't know if I'm even interested in seeing the movie now. I personally am more interested in Farscape and the idea that they might bring back Battlestar Galactica... and to put it in perspective, watching Battlestar reruns now is like going in for oral surgery.

    I believe George should retire on the money he makes on this one, and sign the rights over to the fans before we sue over custody.

    1. Re:He's got one chance with me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now, he has one last chance with me. Two chances if he releases the first three movies on DVD ABOUT FIVE MINUTES AGO

      I'm sure George Lucas is trembling at those words.

    2. Re:He's got one chance with me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You...are...so...fucking...lame...it...hurts...so. . ery...very...much.

    3. Re:He's got one chance with me. by Cyberllama · · Score: 2

      I'm a Star Wars fan (though not a fanatical fan, uhm....I think that makes sense) and I'm not mad about tPM. Sure it didn't live up to the hype, but then again, nothing short of "the greatest movie ever" could have possibly lived up to the hype. The movie itself is well-made and entertaining, you simply have to get past the few bad parts (Yippeee!?! No character in any movie -- ever -- should be heard to utter such a horrible slice of script) and ignore all the hype.

      It was a good movie on many levels, with a happy upbeat feel that should be even more effective when it stands in contrast with the darker feel up the upcoming movies. In many ways it echos episode 4's happy feel contrasted by the darkness in episode 5.

      I think by now that we all know Lucas screwed up. He tried to pander to a certain audience (children) who were more likely to buy up all the merchandising and lost sight of the fact that his audience is comprised of people who are no longer children. It's time we all moved on, recognized the merits of the movie (don't throw the baby out with the bathwater) and gave Lucas another chance. . .

    4. Re:He's got one chance with me. by Guignol · · Score: 1

      You are a fan of Star wars, Farscape (aka space whinners) and Galactica ?
      Woah ! :)
      Aren't you forgetting the muppets show ?
      Seriously, "Pigs in Space" has a better plot, and better, more believable characters.

  40. The music video is out. by antdude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A bit off-topic... Released today on TV and Starwars.com. It had a few new scenes.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:The music video is out. by Lightwarrior · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit of a classical musician. I picked up the cello at 10 and switched to the bass at 16. The orchestra I was in for four years played in Russia, Austria, and the Czech Republic.

      To be blunt, the music of John Williams deeply inspires me. I saw TPM twice in the theaters, but have listened to the CD (except for the last track - ick) countless times. The "music video" struck a chord within me; if there is nothing else redeemable about AotC, the music will continue to be nothing short of moving.

      -lw

      --
      Mods: Disagreeing with me != my post Offtopic / Flamebait.
      World without hate or war, invaded. Tragic?
  41. Count of monte Christo suXX0red by sc_demandred · · Score: 1

    OT me all you want, but I highly reccommend you go get the book or rent the Book On Tape... the movie of Monte Christo was a typical paper-to-celluloid fiasco.

    --

    The hooligans are loose! The hooligans are loose! What if they become ruffians? -- Bill Hicks

  42. Mild Spoilers by SeriousMonkeys · · Score: 1

    Mild Spoilers in the linked stories, by the way.

    Chrisd won't soon live that one down.

    --

    #include <sig.h>
  43. Monkey Mail by soxthemonkee · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am sox the monkey... a sad little monkey, infested with rabies and AIDS. Who can love this monkey? Please give me a banana.

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. noooo!!! I _love_ the horrible merchandise!!! by jdbo · · Score: 1

    Less merchandise? They want to avoid making (and failing to sell) crappy merchandise? Dammit, I actively seek out the crappy merchandise!

    I will be sincerely disappointed if there is nothing coming out of AOTC to at least rival TPM's Jar Jar Binks Moster Mouth Lollipop

    Crap, that thing made my year... read the testimony of several more eloquent kibologists if you somehow fail to be in awe of this "piece of merchandise".

    And just because I'm on the topic of wonderful crap, I feel the need to mention the "Star Wars Holiday Special" and the "Theme from Lord of the Rings (1978) Disco Mix". Truly the stuff that dreams are made of!

  46. Lucas said what? by jbum · · Score: 1

    >> George Lucas states that there were parts of Episode One that were damaging
    >> to the Star Wars franchise. (shocker, I know)
    >> "The last movie did not live up to expectations."

    Yes, the movie sucked.

    No, Lucas did not actually say that.

    In fact, as the article says, "Lucas declined to comment for this story."

    1. Re:Lucas said what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the more i read slashdot the more i realize it's run by a bunch of amateurs that decline the opportunity to check their facts and spoil way too much stuff.

      and jon katz is a putz.

  47. Great Story on TIME.com by Aix · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really enjoyed this story on time.com but didn't feel like dealing with submitting it and having it summarily rejected.

  48. Maybe I'm just paranoid by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...but I could see the merchandise thing as a big win for Lucas.

    Think about this; The merchandisers are the ones paying to make all the SW paraphenalia. It's not like Lucas is shelling out - They're paying HIM. Lucas knew there would be a rush by people making sure they would get all the collectible crap (is it just me, or is everything but the action figures lower quality?) so they made a whole bunch of it. Sure, they didn't sell it all, but Lucas surely realized a big scrooge mcduck-sized pile of money from it.

    So this movie, they're going to reduce the quantity of stuff dramatically which means - you guessed it! - there will be a huge rush on it again. It might take a little time to build up momentum, so toys r us might not have to call in the riot police to get people away from the empty action figure aisle, but it still still produce plenty of cash, and the collectibles will actually have value this time. Not that they don't already, because within just a few months many collectibles were going for over four times their purchase price. I mean, less than a month after they were off the shelves.

    And while we're talking about things which could be intentional; Everyone was going to go see episode one whether it sucked ass or not, so Lucas just didn't have to try. Now, many of us will be waiting to see what our friends have to say about episode 2 before we go see it. Based on the trailers I've seen, It's going to suck, but I guess those are not necessarily static or representative.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Maybe I'm just paranoid by jafac · · Score: 2

      The statement that they're going to be making far less merchandising for this movie accomplishes the main goal of sales:

      Convince your prospective buyer that the product is going to be in limited supply. Therefore, in their mind, it will be "worth" more.

      That's all. The fact that this statement is being broadcast in all the news sources is basically free advertising for Lucasfilm.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  49. Say it with me, now: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    GEORGE LUCAS DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS.

    EP2 (or AOTC or whatever the fuck acronym you're using) could be called "I Hate All of You Stupid Fuckers," consisting of nothing but footage of Lucas taking a shit, and you would LINE UP AROUND THE BLOCK to see it. You will gladly pay him what he demands. Lucas relies on people like you.

    1. Re:Say it with me, now: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some people are creative geniuses. Some people have only a limited amount of creativity to give, and then they've shot their wad. George Lucas falls into the latter category. The original Star Wars was an OK movie. But even that film, when judged in perspective, was a minor opus. Margaret Mitchell, who wrote Gone With the Wind, is another example of a one-time wonder.

      The world would have been a better place if Lucas had stopped with Start Wars. In truth, the world would have been better off without it altogether. Star Wars has done little to contribute to our society other than to raise the level of commercial exploitation. It certainly hasn't raised the level of art by any perceptible degree.

    2. Re:Say it with me, now: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, so long as that Jar-Jar Turd wasn't in the movie...

      ...oh, and have Mr. Hanky as a Jedi Knight?

      We may just have a winner here!

      Just imagine at the beginning, the THX logo slowly displaying on the screen, followed by a fart so loud it shakes the walls of the theatre, and sets off car alarms within 10 square blocks!

      ...ok, enough with the bathroom humor...

  50. watch Star Wars: A New Hope as an adult by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hated The Phantom Menace when I first saw it.

    Then I watched the original three flicks again. They're horrendous. 3P0 is marginally less annoying than Jar Jar. The stories have huge plot holes. Colossal. Mind-boggling.

    You were probably ten, or five, or three when you first saw Star Wars. You were a lot easier on the inconsistencies and absurdities at that age than you are now. The Phantom Menace most definitely wasn't a film classic, but neither were the original three.

    1. Re:watch Star Wars: A New Hope as an adult by Fixer · · Score: 1
      I had the same reaction recently. My pop, who I can recall wincing in pain as we stood in line for four hours waiting to get in to see "The Empire Strikes Back", agreed but offered this idea as to why those original three were so popular:

      "Until Star Wars I came out, scifi movies were depressing and generally dystopic, and had been that way for quite a while. Star Wars made scifi flicks FUN again.."

      --
      "Avast! Prepare for the rodgering!" THWACK! "Arrr.. me nards.."
    2. Re:watch Star Wars: A New Hope as an adult by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2


      You were probably ten, or five, or three when you first saw Star Wars. You were a lot easier on the inconsistencies and absurdities at that age than you are now. The Phantom Menace most definitely wasn't a film classic, but neither were the original three.


      This is an often-touted theory to explain the backlash over EP1. Even Lucas himself has mentioned it in interviews. The concept is that the first 3 films gained a rabid fan base when those fans were younger, less sophisticated, less critical, and are now prone to fits of nostalgia.


      I don't buy it.


      I enjoy Star Wars, but I am no fanboi. I don't even own copies of the Star Wars movies. But I have occasionally rented the origional trillogy or kicked back for a day of TV when a Star Wars "marathon" kicks in. And even though I do note aspects of the films that I didn't when I was young, I still enjoy them. Yet I was disappointed in EP1 and noted that it somehow lacked the soul of the first three flicks.


      Is it nostalgia? Hardly. I've also watched other things that I found great in my childhood that I now cringe at (though still watch occasionally for nostalgia's sake): The A-Team, Buck Rogers, Hogan's Heros, Dukes of Hazard, etc.


      Yea. I'm susceptible to nostalgia. But I also recognize it. And the disparity in the older and newer Star Wars flicks has nothing to do with it.

    3. Re:watch Star Wars: A New Hope as an adult by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      But for a lot of people, it is. The other problem is that George is a revisionist. A heavy revisionist, who buys his own hype. Case in point? Lightsabres. "Lets make Luke's lightsabre in RotJ green, so it stands out against the desert." "Hey! Luke has a green lightsabre! So does Qui Gon! Does that mean that blue lightsabres are for good, red for evil, and green for those who are in between?" "Umm..I'm not telling! *nod wink*"

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:watch Star Wars: A New Hope as an adult by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2


      But for a lot of people, it is.


      Sure. But not for everyone. Thus, I still see this claim as a copout.


      "Hey! Luke has a green lightsabre! So does Qui Gon! Does that mean that blue lightsabres are for good, red for evil, and green for those who are in between?"


      Oh yea. Talk about a fauxpas at the Jedi training academy.


      "Say. Phil. I see you finally got that lightsaber kit finnished. Fire that puppy up and let's check it out!"

      "Sure. [shhhzzzzzzrrr]."

      "Ummm. Phil. Why is your lightsaber red?"

    5. Re:watch Star Wars: A New Hope as an adult by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      I have. Still find the Tattooine in ANH kinda boring, but after that it is a good, nonstop movie.

      Empire kicks major ass other than Lukes whining to Yoda. Should have more Hoth footage.

      RotJ was good, and even the Ewoks have their place in showing how an ignored culture is affected and can make a difference. Oh yeah...and there were speeder bikes :)

      I still have trouble sitting through Phantom Menace, even with surround sound. Just way too much meaningless conversation trying to build up liking for a character who a) seems to accomplish everything via serendipity, and b) you know becomes Darth anyway.

    6. Re:watch Star Wars: A New Hope as an adult by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      "Ummm. Phil. Why is your lightsaber red?"

      lol. that is hilarious!

    7. Re:watch Star Wars: A New Hope as an adult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I saw SW:ANH when I was a student, and I enjoyed it. I always loved film and what the guy had done was to take elements from various film genre and tie them together with a plot-line that whilst it needed a suspension of disbelief, it was fun!!!!

      Apparently a lot of the attack sequences on the death star came from Torah-Torah-Torah, the good WWII flick about Pearl-Harbour. Other aspects, particularly the farm was pure western.

      The end result was a film that wasn't high-art but it was good entertainment. TPM wasn't. I managed finally to see TPE and it was definitely better.

  51. Could be worse by Animats · · Score: 2

    Most big-budget SF movies suck in the plot department. Remember Artificial Stupidity? Melrose Troopers? Final Fuckup? Wing Confuser? Is there a decent plot in any of them?

    1. Re:Could be worse by madburn · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the movies with a good plot seem to go unnoticed. Gary Sinese's movie, "The Impostor" was awesome.

    2. Re:Could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Final Fuckup." Bahahaha. Well said. Mod this guy up.

    3. Re:Could be worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Philip K. Dick stories are good. One of his stories even made Ahnold Shwarzewhatever look good. And Speilberg and Tommy Cruise made a film on one, but it hasn't been released yet, so I don't know if the egos screwed it up. Hmmm...

  52. Blackout by asobala · · Score: 1

    T(H)GSWB, anyone?

  53. Right, they are cutting on the merchandise... by ilyag · · Score: 0

    This site describes several packs of chips labeled with Episode II. Check your local department store... And that's before the release!

    I can imagine Episode II on DVD including 2 DVDs with movie, and three with "additional features".

  54. Lucas Learns From The BIG Black Eye He Got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Ep.I seems to have brought Lucas back to earth and that's a good thing. I suppose that after being told you're a genius-god for 20 years you might begin to believe it yourself and it seems he got carried away in his own legend, not believing he could make any critical mistakes, but after the cold shower of ep.I it looks like he's back on track. Only time will tell, but I'm hoping for the best.

  55. If that's true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then why are they selling this crotch-grabbing Tom Hanks figure?

  56. Story shmory, this is Star Wars, we want.... by ZanshinWedge · · Score: 2

    Jedi battles! Slap in the standard good plot with mythic overtones like the other Star Wars films (the good ones anyway) and I'll stand in line to watch it more than once.

    1. Re:Story shmory, this is Star Wars, we want.... by TheGeneration · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's because you are a mindless lemming who deserves to be raped of his money before running over the cliff with his fellow lemmings.

      --


      The Generation
      I'd say something witty here, but I'm not that bright.
  57. Re:Delusional rich man makes more crap movies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star wars should have died a long time ago.

    and yet, despite this, you will still see it. Probably more than once. Tell me that's not true.

    Nope, didn't think so. Buh bye.

  58. Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by mattdm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you really must revisit this movie, I highly suggest you do so by finding yourself a copy of The Phantom Edit. It's not perfect either, but it gives a sense of how hard it wouldn't have been for Lucas to make the original not suck.

    There's a quote from Lucas in the Time Magazine SWII article (hey, surprise, they got all the major news mags!) which really struck me:

    "I said, 'They're gonna hate this. They're gonna get really upset that I have a 9-year-old as the hero.' But what can I do? That's the story. I can't make him 15. The whole story is about where he came from, who is he? You had to start in the beginning."

    It's pretty obvious that he still doesn't get it. I don't know anyone who complained about a kid being the hero -- a few who complained about the chosen kid's acting ability, and a bunch more who complained about the cutesyness, but this was the first I've heard the idea that the problem is that audiences can't cope with the idea of a child hero. Note to George: um, ex-squeeeze me, there are a few other issues.

    1. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The last thing I want Lucas to do is change things again. I thought the re-editing of Star Wars trilogy was terrible. Shiny new CGI on top of grainy 70s film stock... changes to the story... I was very let down, and I really, really hope when ever Lucas gets around to finally releasing these on DVD, you can find the orgininal versions.

      I can't even find the orgininal versions on VHS anymore.

      And yeah, he totally missed the point of the fans reactions. We did'nt hate the young hero because he was a kid, we hated him because of 'Yippeee!'. We did'nt hate jar-jar because he was'nt chewbacca, we hated him because he talked like some sort of retarded jamacian.

      I remember Lucas' orgininal reactions to critics. He said something to the effect of "I want to make these movies for the kids.. to appeal to them"

      Guess what... I was a little kid when the orgininal star wars came out, and it appealed to me emensly. I vaguly remember the 'but uncle owen.. I want to go down to mos isly to pick up some power-converters' thinking 'Why is this man whining like a little kid?' Kids don't like to see heros acting like little kids. They like to see heros act like heros, regardless of their age.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by dupper · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, try telling Wil that no one hates child heroes.

    3. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by bitrott · · Score: 1

      It's a story about a child. Told from a child's POV. Of course it going to come across as less than serious. It only makes sense.

    4. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by whovian · · Score: 1

      Guess what... I was a little kid when the orgininal star wars came out, and it appealed to me emensly.

      You just read my mind. "Making the movies for the kids" is simply patronising. Fortunately, IMHO, it seems that this time around Mr. Lucas is aiming to give the children some respect. I am looking forward to the movie.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    5. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I simple will not buy a copy of Star Wars where Han Solo doesn't shoot first.

    6. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by Enigma2175 · · Score: 2
      My favorite quote from the Time article is this:

      But you have to remember that when we did The Empire Strikes Back, some people hated C-3PO. When we did Jedi, they just loathed the Ewoks. There was no Internet to jazz it up, but there was the same conversation. Fans are very opinionated, and that's good. But I can't make a movie for fans."

      Why can't he make a movie for the fan? They are the ones who made Lucas what he is today. Contrary to the article in the original story, I don't think he has learned his lesson. Although AotC may be more adult-oriented I think Lucas still doesn't "get it".

      --

      Enigma

    7. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by cheese_wallet · · Score: 2

      Why can't he make a movie for the fan? They are the ones who made Lucas what he is today. Contrary to the article in the original story, I don't think he has learned his lesson. Although AotC may be more adult-oriented I think Lucas still doesn't "get it".

      You whine more than luke skywalker.

    8. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoted from the article (emphasis mine):

      "The last movie did not live up to expectations," writes Lucas in a pitch memo to toy maker Hasbro--one of the key Star Wars merchandisers--obtained by Newsweek.

      The /. headline makes it look like Lucas thought the film on its own merits were not up to par, but it's all really about how much toys and other junk you sell. Which shows that Lucas has no friggin' clue. If a movie is good, it's irrelevant how much junk it sells.

      Frankly, I don't think anyone with a greedy motivation can make a great piece of art. The root is everything, if it's rotten the plant should be ripped out.

    9. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see protagonists acting like humans.

      In Hollywood, the infallibility of the "good guys" under most circumstances is really annoying. But people expect it and changing that would upset too many consumers...

    10. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by zeus_tfc · · Score: 2
      "I said, 'They're gonna hate this. They're gonna get really upset that I have a 9-year-old as the hero.' But what can I do? That's the story. I can't make him 15. The whole story is about where he came from, who is he? You had to start in the beginning."


      I don't know anyone who complained about a kid being the hero -- a few who complained about the chosen kid's acting ability, and a bunch more who complained about the cutesyness, but this was the first I've heard the idea that the problem is that audiences can't cope with the idea of a child hero.

      This is exactly why I don't like TPM. The kid wasn't the hero. He didn't really have any meaningful reason for existence in the movie except to introduce him, and as such he played far too great a roll.

      The story was supposed to be about the power play by the trade federation, the planet that was caught in it, and the two Jedi that tried to resolve it. I don't see any reason for the kid to be involved. Sure, he had to show up, and show enough ability that he required training, but surely that could have been done without such a comedy of errors.

      The pod race was pointless. It was only there to show off boy wonder, and I really could have done without the boy wonder blowing up the trade federation base with his little "oops".
      Just some thoughts.
      --
      "...At the end of the day"..."when everyone goes home, you're stuck with yourself." RIP Layne Staley
    11. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      interstellar_donkey wrote:

      > I was very let down, and I really, really
      > hope when ever Lucas gets around to finally
      > releasing these on DVD, you can find the
      > orgininal versions.

      So, we're not boycoting DVD any more?

    12. Re:Phantom Edit / Lucas's worldview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, we're not boycoting DVD any more?

      Correct, *we* aren't boycotting DVD any more. We are boycotting electricity, water and air though. Please reboot your brain and start thinking for yourself.

  59. karma whore and it dont work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice karma whore, but they dont even have the movie up, you cant view it. wtf/?

  60. dialog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Episode I dialog generator:

    if (drand48() < 0.5)
    return "be mindful";
    else
    return "you assume too much";

    1. Re:dialog by slittle · · Score: 1

      Eps 4, 5 and 6 dialog generator:

      if (drand48() 0.5)
      return "it's not yet operational";
      else
      return "IT'S FUCKING OPERATIONAL!";

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    2. Re:dialog by SheldonYoung · · Score: 2

      Version 1.1:

      return ( drang89() 0.5 ) ? "be mindful" : "you assume too much"; // TPM 2000

    3. Re:dialog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you learned C++. Congrats.

    4. Re:dialog by VikingBerserker · · Score: 1

      More accurate:

      if (drand48()

      return "Yippee!"

      else

      return "you assume too much";

  61. the only thing you need to know by thopo · · Score: 1

    Lucas in a TIME interview: Fans are very opinionated, and that's good. But I can't make a movie for fans

    --
    keep it simple.
  62. Re:Revisiting TPM - Bull Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jar jar sucks. EP1 just sucks all around; it is crap when it comes to the real meat and potatoes.

    Have you seen American Graffiti? A real Lucas flick. Star Wars and ESB are so good, and get better and better. This stuff is just shit.

    TPM sucked so bad, it was kiddie Nintenblow universe. I was so pissed, I saw it the first day it came out (and lol to the jerkoff who line up and don't know how to use Moviefone or fandango, hahahha, lol, the jerks in the lineups hahahah)

    I was so pissed i went the movies at 12 at night for that load of crap. I have seen scores of better movies since.

    Star wars and especially ESB set the standards too high for that fat pedophilic Lucas to ever achieve again. The best thing for the SW franchise would be his death so a real director can take a shot at EP3 without screwing it all to hell.

    I call for your DEATH, G. Lucas ! You are a goat ass.

    Seriously, Ill get modded down for saying all this, but its true, and you all know it. EP1 was whoring for cash, cash cowing, garbage. Merchandising like McDonalds happy meals.
    The story sucked, it was full of holes, it was way too short to take on what they took on, and to have Anakin flailing around like a retard and haphazardly winning the battle is LAME LAME. Lucas is a pedophile, btw. He adopts reams of portly and corpulent children, has you seen his adopted kids? He keeps them fat so they feel like crap about themselves and don't have the courage to report his molestations.

    Its no wonder Lucas is divorced. He is a sick pathetic man. He is fat, he is greedy. He needs to die. I hate him for ruining EP1. I pray for his termination. I wish I was Boba Fett with a poop rocket so he would die of e coli.

  63. George Doesn't State Anything... by GeekLife.com · · Score: 2

    "Lucas declined to comment for this story." Everything they have is heresay from people "involved" with the movie.

    And yes, it is important to be very accurate with these sorts of facts.

  64. better quote by thopo · · Score: 2, Informative

    another quote from the same interview: Fans are very opinionated, and that's good. But I can't make a movie for fans

    --
    keep it simple.
  65. 37 year-old guys on the internet by handsomepete · · Score: 1

    "He's not a stupid man. He doesn't want to hurt the franchise." There's evidence to back that up.

    And from this article:

    Lucas blames the anti-Jar Jar sentiment on "37-year-old guys who spend all their time on the Internet. But you have to remember that when we did The Empire Strikes Back, some people hated C-3PO. When we did Jedi, they just loathed the Ewoks. There was no Internet to jazz it up, but there was the same conversation. Fans are very opinionated, and that's good. But I can't make a movie for fans."

    Well, any evidence they *did* have may have just been negated...

  66. Random plot generator for Lucas to use... by crumbz · · Score: 2

    Your objective is simple: Destroy the Earth
    Your motive is a little bit more complex: Revenge

    Stage One:

    To begin your plan, you must first Incapacitate a Military General. This will cause the world to sit up and take notice, stunned by your arrival. Who is this Evil Genius? Where did they come from? And why do they look so good in a Corporate Suit?

    Stage Two:

    Next, you will Seize control of the White House. This will cause countless hordes of Computer Programmers to flock to you, begging to do your every bidding. Your name will become synonymous with Sheer dementedness, as lesser men whisper your name in terror.

    Stage Three:

    Finally, you will Unleash your Thermonuclear Missiles, bringing about Horrors beyond Man's Comprehension. This will all be done from a Corporate Tower, an excellent choice if we might say. These three deeds will herald the end, and the citizens of this planet will have no choice but to elect you their new god.

    Trust us, it'll all come together in the end.

    1. Re:Random plot generator for Lucas to use... by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Stage 1: Go to earth
      Stage 2:
      Stage 3: PROFIT!

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
  67. Not trust, but Lucas' whoreing makes it believable by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

    I love the Star Wars movies with a great passion, but Lucas is, basically, a consumer whore.

    I'll believe it when I see it...

    I happen to share your opinion about Lucas but it's for exactly this reason that I'm willing to entertain the notion that Lucas may indeed have gotten the message that TPM sucked. My personal theory is that Lucas doesn't care about the Star Wars story anymore and that he's using the movies now to finance CGI technology improvements. And a large portion of his money comes from merchandising. So he has to pay attention to the criticism. He might believe in his heart that TPM was a great film and that everyone who didn't like it is an idiot. But because all "those idiots" didn't buy as many Jar-Jar ties as he hoped, I think he has to make a more grown-up film, whether he wants to or not! Again, this relies on my theory that Lucas doesn't really care about the movies -- he's just using them to finance his true love of CGI.

    GMD

  68. I'm still not sure why people worship Lucas... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1, Troll

    Sure, Ep. 4-6 kick ass, with ESB being the best of the three.

    And yes, Lucas is mostly responsible. But, isn't it possible, I ask, that this has nothing to do with talent? When I see something like this, my first reaction is to assume the man in charge is talented, but this is by no means a certainty. Maybe it was a 1 in 10,000,000,000,000 thing. Something he lucked out on, and could never do again. Maybe inspiration is a fleeting thing, and abandoned him. Maybe he has a million monkeys in his skull, and those days they had Shakespeare to offer him. There are lots of possible answers, and no good way to prove one or the other.

    This isn't meant as flamebait, exactly. Just some thoughts. Besides, it is possible that I'll be proven wrong, there is only a month or so to wait.

    1. Re:I'm still not sure why people worship Lucas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was a bunch of acid-dropping high school students who made the films popular. ;)

      To call Star Wars a masterpiece.. It's debatable. It depends on what you're qualifying as masterpieces.

      A masterpiece of science fiction? Please, go look in the mirror and laugh at yourself.

      A masterpiece of marketing? I'd say yes. It takes a tired old story that everyone loves, repackages it, and sells it, once more, to the public.

    2. Re:I'm still not sure why people worship Lucas... by Rary · · Score: 1
      Personally, I don't worship Lucas. I kind of think he's a twit. Granted, if I ever met him, I'd be rather star-struck and would thank him for making a bunch of movies that have brought me much enjoyment over the course of many years. But I'd still think he's a twit.

      I'd bet that a lot of what made Star Wars good is a combination of dumb luck, the contributions of others, and the fact that it appealed to kids. Anything that kids like is likely going to stay with them for the rest of their lives. Which is perfect from a marketing perspective. I don't like Star Wars today because it's good, I like Star Wars today because it's been ingrained in me since I was 5-years old that Star Wars is good.

      And having talent like Harrison Ford, and brilliant writers like Leigh Brackett definitely helps.

      "The Empire Strikes Back... is malodorous offal... everything is stale, limp, desperately stretched out, and pretentious.. Harrison Ford (Han) offers loutishness for charm and becomes the epitome of the interstellar drugstore cowboy. Mark Hamill (Luke) is still the talentless Tom Sawyer of outer space - wide-eyed, narrow-minded, strait-laced. Worst of all is Carrie Fisher, whose Leia is a cosmic Shirley Temple but without the slightest acting ability or vestige prettiness." (John Simon in National Review, June 13, 1980)

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  69. Re:Delusional rich man makes more crap movies. by locust · · Score: 4, Funny
    Mod me down as flame


    The moderation options need a '+/-1: he asked for it'.


    --locust

  70. A Second Chance by seinethinker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After watching Phantom Menace and being a child of the 80s, how could I not be but a bit disappointed. It just wasn't what I thought it would be. It was overtly cheesy. The comedy was very forced. It didn't seem natural.

    I had no problem with the graphics. Of course, I hated Jar Jar. He was the main representative of the cheesy comedy that ensued within the film.

    Another fault I found was that Darth Maul didn't seem evil enough. The part was dimunitive.

    I didn't like the Trade Federation reps either as I find their voices and appearance very annoying. They were even very menacing.

    The robots, egads, they didn't need to talk. "Roger, Roger"... could you be more cliche?

    The biggest beef I have is with the Anakin saves the day sequence... This whole scene was far fetched from the Auto pilot to the sudden overheating of his ship to the uncanny idea that a chief component - determinal to the starbase was inside a landing hanger.

    Ok... enough dissing PM for it wasn't all bad.

    Now when I heard what Lucas decided to call Episode II, I inherently whinced. I begun to glaze over. I wanted more action less overcheesy forced comedy. Also, I was to look forward to a fluffer romance. Mind you... I am a GIRL! I like romances.. but after PM... I want action. hehe...

    However, I changed mind my after reading an article issued by TIME. I became hopeful. I have seen images and I have seen some small footage from the movie. I am actually excited about Star Wars again. Perhaps, there is a charm about second chances. I can't wait!!

    If you want to check out that TIME article... visit here:

    http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101020429/

    ~ SeineThinker ~

    --
    Truth like surgery, may hurt, but it cures. - Han Suyin, Chinese Physician and Writer
    1. Re:A Second Chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny



      Dear Seinethinker,

      Thank you so much for sharing your suggestions.

      After one second of consideration, I decided to print your post and use it to wipe my ass.

      I look forward to wiping my ass with the money that you and your friends will spend to see my new movie next month.

      Sincerely,
      George Lucas

    2. Re:A Second Chance by Sebastopol · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, I was to look forward to a fluffer romance.

      Um... about "fluffer romance"... er... nevermind, i'll resist the childish impulse.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    3. Re:A Second Chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMFAO

      Love it when I find that I am not alone with my sick sense of humor

    4. Re:A Second Chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mind you... I am a GIRL!

      Uh.....are u hot? Huh huh.....

    5. Re:A Second Chance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the size of george's ass you might need to print off all the comments on this poll.

  71. 5 compelling reasons to go see Episode II by artels · · Score: 1

    Reasons 1 to 5:
    - Natalie Portman

    1. Re:5 compelling reasons to go see Episode II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Reasons 1 to 5:
      > - Natalie Portman

      Coincidentally the same five reasons for the Jenin Massacre.

    2. Re:5 compelling reasons to go see Episode II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep -- she dodged the Draft.

  72. Re:You boner... by lugonn · · Score: 1

    ...didn't you ever see "Empire Strikes Back"?! Romance BELONGS in Star Wars. There is a reason ESB is the most beloved movie in the series. It's the only one that isn't cheesy crap, because you get to see the characters act like real people, not puppets led around by stupid plot devices. If you want to associate character development with "chick stuff", then you'd better stick to watching WWF.

    The jokes and sexual innuedoes in ESB are what separates it from the rest. Take Star Trek for example. The original one had humor and sex. TNG had neither(not consistantly anyway) and wasn't loved like the original. Enterprise captures that human side of the story and brings it back. So, lets hope that AOTC brings the human factor back to Star Wars.


    (p.s. i don't really think you're a boner)

  73. We're trying to be positive about the whole thing by sc_demandred · · Score: 1

    Lucas has already chosen his cast, we're just making do with what we have. No need to question Natalie Portman's popularity in this venue.

    --

    The hooligans are loose! The hooligans are loose! What if they become ruffians? -- Bill Hicks

  74. Re:Delusional rich man makes more crap movies. by p3d0 · · Score: 1
    Mod me down as flame
    Confuscius says: Just because someone says this doesn't mean their post is not a flame.
    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  75. Lucas: Marketer, not Filmmaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The evidence is clear Lucas' filmaking skills, movie after movie, are atrophying from disuse. I think if Lucas writes another script with repititive dialogue (how wude, yuo assume too much) I'm going to piuke. Being the new movie is called CLONES I know my hope is forlorn.

    Put some TIME into the script. Hearing the same thing over and over belongs in video games, nowhere else.

    And why the hell did he use an off-the-shelf Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird for the queens spaceship. I suppose it is a beautiful AIRcraft (1960s vintage, now obsolete). I guess he wanted to use existing Blackbird polystyrene molds and some new decals for the massmarket StarWars Nubians.

    And the Darth Maul noncharacter does nothing except dilute Vader's badassedness. He exists just to sell dolls along with the rest of the Jedi Council freakshow. Ugh.

    Tip to Lucas: Get off your marketing horse and make something of lasting value. Write a decent script. Have you thought about this? Who the hell is going to buy Jar Jar Binks Dolls 20 years from now? But the Han Solo Dolls still move. Why? because it was a decent film.

  76. i dont know about that by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    i dont know about increasing quality of war movies. I dont think saving private ryan was nearly as good as movies like apocalypse now or full metal jacket. Same goes for foreign war movies like das boot and and some russian ww2 movies i will not try to write out. Honestly i dont think the quality of war movies is improving.

    1. Re: i dont know about that by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > I dont think saving private ryan was nearly as good as movies like apocalypse now or full metal jacket.

      Or Cross of Iron.

      I'm not sure what to make of SPR. It was stunning, but a bit bizarre in other ways. When I got home and tried to decide what it was "about", the best answer I could come up with is that it's a kind of pornography -- complete with a waving flag at the start and end of the tape.

      A troubling movie, because of all the violence, but unfortunately not a thought-provoking movie. I haven't felt the faintest twinge of an urge to see it again, despite the superb craftsmanship.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  77. Re:Delusional rich man makes more crap movies. by Allen+Varney · · Score: 1

    Seems like the Flamebait choice should be split into "Stupid Flamebait (-1)" and "Really Good Flamebait (+1)."

  78. Re:You boner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original one had humor and sex. TNG had neither(not consistantly anyway) and wasn't loved like the original. Enterprise captures that human side of the story and brings it back

    ... Growing up, I thought Data WAS the human side of TNG... But maybe that's why I'm on Slashdot.

  79. Lucas the Slutt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Lucas pretends to be getting it, but he doesn't. The neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegro Jar Jar idea was very sad. Lucas should have axed Jar Jar entirely, but he insisted on giving Jar Jar a cameo in AOTC. Who ordered that? No one in consumerland. Its Lucas' way of saying F*** U to all of us.

    And now the snotty, bad actor Anakin is replaced by the horny, egomaniac Quaterback. Yawn. A tortured Anakin being seduced by the dark side would make a much better protagonist. Instead Anakin thinks the force will get him laid. Yawn.

    I guess George can see a cool video game in those stupid hovercars, much like the meanginless pod race in TPM; had nothing to do with anything.

    An an electric guitar in the soundtrack? Why not digitally reconstruction Freddy Mercury's voice and we can have Queen sing the main title? At least they're not cameoing N-SYNC. Ohh.. yeah... they are.

    Retire George. Let someone who gives a damn make your friggin movies for you. Whore.

    1. Re:Lucas the Slutt by diverman · · Score: 1

      Too bad I don't have a "moderate" drop down on this. I would mod it up. Good points. I mean, I'm not AS pessimistic, but I agree with a lot of what you say, and your perspective.

      -Alex

  80. i dont agree by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    I know this argument has been used a lot.

    As I am one of the very few people that did not really see the original trilogy as a kid (lived in a faraway country and the tickets sold out so fast i never had a chance) I think that the first three movies even though very lighthearted, are quite entertainiong for adults.

    They are pretty darn good adventure movies. There were charecters you cared about, villians that were pretty cool, a plot that had fairy tale kind of quality - where you know it is a bit too simplistic but you still get into it.

    The characters got into all kinds of exciting adventures and perils. There was a nice love story and some delicious footage where the princess was enslaved and chained in her bikinis by a fat sloberring freak - what more could you ask for?

    Phantom menace on the other hand had too many characters and i didnt care about most of them, the main girl's appearence and lines were so stylized as to remove any sex appeal, the main male character was a 7 year old. There was no chemistry between any of the characters.

    You never cared about anything of the adventures, because you dont care about the characters and you know who is going to survive and win.

    So i think there was a difference. It was not just youth that made you like the trilogy.

  81. Re:You boner... by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    No consistant humor or sex on TNG? Riker was almost as big a horndog as Kirk. TNG not as loved as the TOS? You're welcome to your opinion, but I wonder what series you've been watching? Doesn't sound like the TNG I remember. As for the bashing of Episode 1, I have to agree with Lucas. A lot of it was coming from "37 year old men that didn't like Jar Jar Binks". He correctly pointed out that these same guys also though C3P0 was lame. It was overhyped, but let's face it, a lot of it kicked ass (the Qui Gon/ObiWan/Maul fight alone was worth the price of admission). Also, I think you'll get a bit of an arguement that ESB is the best of the first trilogy. Sorry, it was really good, but Star Wars (IV, New Hope) was Revolutionary. There is a difference.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  82. The sad thing is, erm, is... by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    This is precisely the crap that's gonna be worth mucho dinero in 20 years.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  83. Re:5 compelling reasons to not go see Episode II by anderman · · Score: 1

    1-5: Lucas sucks at writing/directing

  84. After all, it is his... by The_dev0 · · Score: 1
    It seems a lot of the comments here are suggesting George Lucas re-edit/re-write to suit people's personal tastes. This ain't flamebait,(I hated Jar-Jar as much as anybody) but...

    Isn't it his flick? If he wants to make it 2 hours of watching grass grow, thats his choice isn't it? I mean, how many of us here have money riding on the success of these films (comic-book-store-guys excluded, of course!)or in fact have any right to demand a change to what is, effectively, his own creative work? I understand that I, along with pretty much every adult male loves the Star Wars franchise, but I don't see it that he owes us anything. If you don't like it, don't go see it.

    I think that his biggest problem with this franchise, it has become so fucking HUGE that no matter what he chooses to do it will no doubt upset somebody. Everybody knows Star Wars, even if they don't adore it. I went and saw tPM knowing full well that this movie had to appeal from 4 year old kids up to adult zealots who live Star Wars every living, breathing minute, which to me that sounds like a bloody big group to keep happy. And you know what? It wasn't as bad as I expected it to be. I don't think he's doing to bad a job, considering. Imagine the pressure he is under to satisfy the masses, no matter what their tastes...

    Man, better him than me (I guess thats why he gets the big bucks).

    --
    Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    1. Re:After all, it is his... by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 1

      Maybe he tried to experiment with something (like Jar Jar) but, it didn't work like he thought and it back-fired on him? Sure Lucas has the right to make his movies however he wants to. But, the public has the right to complain. Why not? In a way Lucas kind of does owe us all something -- we are the ones who made him rich!

      But, I don't think George Lucas really give a shit what people think about him or his movies. He's a rich mother-fucker and does exactly what he loves doing everyday for living.

      What more could want?

  85. Not bad is not good enough by L-Train8 · · Score: 2

    when you strip away all the hype, the product tie-ins, the in your face constant advertising, and just go see the movie on it's own merits, it's not really all that bad.

    I have to agree with that statement, however, this is Star Wars, and "not bad" is simply not good enough. An average sci-fi movie with great effects, a tedious plot, and annoying dialogue is not what fans expect or deserve. I really hope George Lucas is spending less time on the marketing of AOTC and more time on the filmaking, but until I see the finished product, I'm skeptical of this article's spin.

    --

    Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
  86. you won't see Episode 2? but Jango Fett!!!!!!!! by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    how can you diss Jango Fett!?!?! he's got to be cooler than Boba...... he shoots laser guns like Billy the Kid...... and he uses the jet pack thing before the movie get's a reworking. whatever, fine... your loss. i'm not in line now, nor will i be till a few days (or more) after the movie opens... but i will probably see it in the first week of release. hopefully it will be nearly as good as Resident Evil, though without zombies i don'tt know how.

  87. Re: Attack of the Clones by rmohr02 · · Score: 2
  88. Episode I was known to many as... by Trogre · · Score: 1

    ...the Merchandise Menace!

    I remember in '99 not being able to turn around in a mall without seeing drink cups, shop posters, sticker sets, comic books proudly displaying the "STAR WARS EPISODE I The Phantom Menace" logo. Interesting to note also that "EPISODE I" was always written bigger than the actual title of the movie, "The Phantom Menace".

    The over-saturation was enough to make even a fan like myself sick of the sight of "Star Wars", even though I loved the movie.

    Still, I guess if LucasFilm had UNDER-merchandised the film (no toys, books etc) people would have called it "The Phantom Merchandise".

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  89. Dude just bring your food in. by sideshow · · Score: 1

    I just hit El Polo Loco on the way over and eat it during the movie., try it.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

    1. Re:Dude just bring your food in. by dimator · · Score: 2

      I just hit El Polo Loco on the way over

      My guess is that you'll be hitting the toilet on the way out.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  90. Plan B by l810c · · Score: 1
    Or go to plan B, which has Jar Jar meet his decapatastic demise at the hands of the Emperor in the first thirty seconds of the movie.

    Instead of the E1 garbage compactor, have a giant garbage disposal(the sink type grinders). I don't know to spell this, but imagine the sound(the sound he(and kids) makes like humming and flicking your lips up and down with your forefinger). Whirl this, then grind.

  91. Tons of Unsold Merchandise? by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

    Can I get some of those full size Jar Jar Binks mannequins on the cheap? Those would make excellent live fire target practice dummies...

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  92. Less Plastic Crap by istartedi · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean, there's official Star Wars(TM) plastic crap, and I've never seen it??? If they're going to be making less of it, I'd better pick some up fast. No more generic fake do-do for me. From now on it's Star Wars(TM) plastic crap, or nothing at all... unless they make fake vomit too.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  93. as the saying goes.. by slittle · · Score: 1

    fool me once, shame on you.
    fool me twice, shame on me.

    --
    Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
  94. Too much has been written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know being an AC will not allow this to be modded up, but I think we have to look at what has been written in the extended Star Wars Universe books. There has been many, many stories written, and it would be very difficult for Lucas to write something that doesn't contradict, or lie in the time of those events. What would be AWESOME is if they would make movies of the Timothy Zahn trilogy. They were excellent books, easily as enjoyable as the original trilogy. For Lucas to write in a period that has been written my many, many authors would put too many handcuffs on his ability to make a new story.

    1. Re:Too much has been written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree the Zahn Trilogy rocked. And the jedi academy trilogy was pretty good too. Darksaber was probably the best book so far.

      The problem with the any book written post-episode 6 is that they still are based on luke,leia, han etc.
      Sorry, but those guys are too old to play the parts now and it wouldn't make sense to use other actors.

      A new trilogy would have to be set far enough into the future that it could have a whole new cast.

    2. Re:Too much has been written by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 1

      bah. none of that stuff is canonical. Those books are the literary equivalent of deer hunter video games, they are just crap thrown together. I doubt lucas would blink at making them all anachronistic.

      Think: Dragonlance "novels", Star Trek "novels", ad infinitum. I hate that stuff, it takes shelf space away from decent SF literature.

      Here's an exercise for you.

      1. Go into a bookstore, walk over to the science fiction section.
      2. Measure the total shelf space given to Niven, Clarke, Heinlein, Bester, Simak, and Philip K. Dick. hell throw in lesser talents like Asimov, Tim Powers, Zelazny,John Campbell..
      3. Now measure the total shelf space that's taken up by Star Wars novelizations, or Dragonlance books.

      If you don't see a problem with that, kindly stop breathing now. No wonder people don't take science fiction or fantasy stuff seriously, it's audience is largely composed of mouth breathers who can't tell the difference between Tolkein and Terry Brooks

    3. Re:Too much has been written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kindly stop breathing now
      Jeez, I didn't think I would offend by saying that Zahn had a pretty good trilogy. Before he wrote those books (including everyone else) they had to get approval by Lucas. I find it difficult he would nullify everything that has been written in the last 10 years, especially considering how good a franchise he has going.

    4. Re:Too much has been written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pull yourself away from your computer for just a second.
      Go to the mirror and take a good long look at yourself.
      You sir, are a homosexual.

      It's pretty clear by your comments that your pompous attitude towards things the general public considers entertaining makes you one of a very small minority.

      I'm not saying that every pompous human is gay(just look at england), but in my experience arrogant assholes are generally trying to compensate for something most would consider deviant.

      I could be wrong, and your attempt at sounding like a science fiction literature expert may just be compensation for an actual cognitive deficeny. However, I think you are just a homosexual, possibly a repressed one.

      One more thing. Just because no one understands you, doesn't mean your an artist.

      Have a nice day, and try to play nicely.

    5. Re:Too much has been written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well the only star wars series that i've wanted to see taken to the screen is the incredible thrawn saga by timothy zhan, takes place 10? years after return of the jedi witha grand admiral attempting to piece back the empire from its internal squables and 10 years of the rebellion/republi picking them apart.

    6. Re:Too much has been written by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      blah, ad hominem attacks because you can't defend the dog shit you like to read beyond saying, "it's mass entertainment".

      Listen, I like greasy kid stuff as much as the next guy. If you think the list of SF authors I named are "high brow" then you are indeed sadly misinformed. If I'd come in here and started telling you all that you are wasting your time unless you read a constant diet of obscure 20th century philosophers, you'd have an argument .. that would have been pompous. All I'm trying to say is let's demand some quality from our mass entertainment

      I don't like cynical, mass-produced trash like the vast majority of movie and tv show novel tie-ins. If you people would stop buying anything that said fucking "star wars" on it, I might have a chance to read better books.

      Fucking semi-literate mouth breathers with no functioning shit-detectors all want books in my favourite genre.. argh

    7. Re:Too much has been written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking semi-literate mouth breathers with no functioning shit-detectors all want books in my favourite genre.. argh

      favOUrite?
      Nice. You are a pompous british asshole.

      Sorry that I may have misjudged you as being gay.
      And as far as my post being an ad hominem attack, or calling you an asshole being ad hominem. Well, calling those who enjoyed books like the Zahn trilogy mouth-breathers hardly helps your argument. You insult a group, you get insulted. That's the breaks.

      I don't like cynical, mass-produced trash like the vast majority of movie and tv show novel tie-ins. If you people would stop buying anything that said fucking "star wars" on it, I might have a chance to read better books.

      Hey, no one likes being robbed and force fed shit in return.
      You have to consider how things like the star wars post-jedi novels came into such popularity.

      It had been about 7 years after jedi that Heir to the Empire(Zahn trilogy book one) was realeased. People were begging to be taken back to that fantasy world. The books were actually pretty well written and the story was interesting. Oh no! the books were successful and a mass market created!

      Yes, many of the books written have been shit. Barbara Hambly's two books being prime examples of a godawful author with a star wars license.

      Most of these books were written before The Jar-Jar movie hit the theaters. A time when we didn't quite realize what a slimeball Lucas is. The star wars universe was a nice escape and not so quickly associated with taco bell, n'sync, and 5 year-olds.

      One more thing, if star wars novels are somehow pushing your literary masterpieces off the shelves, try shopping at a bigger bookstore.

    8. Re:Too much has been written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes place five years after Return of the Jedi.

      The problem is that the actors are now 18 or 19 years older and look about 30 years older.

    9. Re:Too much has been written by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 1

      favOUrite? Nice. You are a pompous british asshole.

      Try Canadian.

      Sorry that I may have misjudged you as being gay.

      I'll live

      And as far as my post being an ad hominem attack, or calling you an asshole being ad hominem. Well, calling those who enjoyed books like the Zahn trilogy mouth-breathers hardly helps your argument. You insult a group, you get insulted. That's the breaks.

      Heh, yeah I guess I did. twice, actually. oops!

      It had been about 7 years after jedi that Heir to the Empire(Zahn trilogy book one) was realeased. People were begging to be taken back to that fantasy world. The books were actually pretty well written and the story was interesting. Oh no! the books were successful and a mass market created!

      I actually always figured it was children who were the target audience

      Yes, many of the books written have been shit. Barbara Hambly's two books being prime examples of a godawful author with a star wars license.

      Licensed material, as in "we'll sell the license instead of making a quality product" is usually garbage. This is my core point

      Most of these books were written before The Jar-Jar movie hit the theaters. A time when we didn't quite realize what a slimeball Lucas is. The star wars universe was a nice escape and not so quickly associated with taco bell, n'sync, and 5 year-olds.

      Irrelevant. I love Star Wars - see my post elsewhere in the thread about actually enjoying TPM.

      One more thing, if star wars novels are somehow pushing your literary masterpieces off the shelves, try shopping at a bigger bookstore.

      If it were really that easy .. the problem is that publishing is a zero-sum game. The more garbage that gets printed, the less of the "good stuff" that does.

      Look at it this way. If a movie like "Dungeons and Dragons" had been a commercial success, there would be a lower probability that good stuff like "Fellowship of the Ring" gets made - if you can stuff shit down the audience's throats, why bother trying to find quality?

  95. Yoda Re:You're wrong. by DecoDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why are there personal ads for Yoda??? Why. Why. Why. Here I was all worried about the Dawson's Creekishness of the preview... recovering from that based on what people have said of the second. And, now I learn they're marketing this thing with cheesy personal ad posters from Yoda. What the hell is that?

    I was shocked and numbed (okay, I got over it). But sheesh... What on earth. Damaging... you want damaging? Make chessy posters of Yoda personal ads. That's damaging.

    Over reacting? Probably. But what the hell??

  96. LOTR? by SHiFTY1000 · · Score: 1

    Don't know about you, but I thought LOTR: FOTR was a "big" movie... Most everyone i know went to see it. Maybe thats just a comment on the people i know!

    1. Re:LOTR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most everyone

      you mean *almost everyone*? what's with the level of illiteracy in the US these days? if i hear 'already' used in the present tense again in the next week i am going to go nuts.

    2. Re:LOTR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you mean *almost everyone*? what's with the level of illiteracy in the

      Is English not your first language? "Most everyone" is a phrase that has been used in British English for at least 200 years, in both speech and writing. Presumably, it has carried over to American English. Try reading some of the literary classics from this period---you're bound to trip over it.

  97. Wonderful role model... by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe it's just me, but I find the entire marketing scheme behind Starwars a bit disturbing anymore... Episodes 4-6 were fine. We had a Hero and his Alliance topple the Big Evil Dude and his Empire.

    Now in 1-3, we see how the Big Evil Dude and his Empire got started. Fine. Except for one thing... They're marketing a mass murder to kids. Yeah! Get the Ep.1 Jar-Jar and Anakin coloring book! He's just like you, kids! Buy his toys, see the movie! Yes, watch Ep.2! Watch Anakin fall in love! He's a rebel with a cause! What? Yeah, sure, he enslaves most of the known Universe, becomes second in command to Umber-Hitler, hunts the Jedi to near extinction and kills billions with his Giant Planet Killing Weapon, but that's besides the point. Kids will eat this stuff up!

    Personally, I think Eps 2-3 will be the best of the new trilogy and I'll enjoy them throughly, but the with the way they're marketing em, I NEVER want to hear a complaint about ANY videogame violence AGAIN.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Wonderful role model... by Demoknight · · Score: 1

      movie = noninteractive
      videogame = interactive
      understanding the opposing viewpoint is a key to destroying it.
      but don't get me wrong. i understand and agree with your point completely.
      your argument reminds me of the whole bit in clerks about the hired workers on the death star that were killed when the thing blew up... drama happens in films that we don't full register when we see it... it goes along with the whole justifying the means with the ends thing...

      ok im done blathering...

  98. Eh? by MisterBlister · · Score: 1

    Lucas never once in that article claims that TPM hurt the franchise. "Jim Silver, publisher of trade magazine The Toy Book", did. Do the people who submit or the editors even read the articles or just skim them?

    You guys want me to pay for this type of wonderful reporting?

  99. spoilers on this one too. by steeef · · Score: 1

    beware. i only read 2/3rds of this article because i was told there were spoilers near the end. granted this is secondhand information, but i wouldn't want to risk it.

  100. Re:Delusional rich man makes more crap movies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good joke! Too bad you incited people to "mod down" the original comment.

    +5 Funny * -1 Over My Head = -5

  101. that isn't too insightful, is it? by steeef · · Score: 1

    it doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

  102. Jar Jar burn now! by Aaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

    They'll cut the merchandise by two thirds, as they still have tons of unsold Episode One merchandise

    I did my part in supporting the Lucas franchise: My catharsis involved the purchase of 3 Jar Jar Binks action figures, an old microwave, an extension cord and my backyard. Of course, after the 2nd one has been melted in the microwave, most of the curative effect has expended itself.

    --
    Give them an inch and they'll take a foot. Much more than that, you won't have a leg to stand on.
  103. The Onion foretold this by jcphil · · Score: 1

    Earlier, The Onion had a story saying that Congress was planning to impose limits on "incredibly stupid shit". Among the things that Congress was supposed to be upset about was thousands of left-over Jar Jar Binks dolls.

    1. Re:The Onion foretold this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Earlier, The Onion had a story saying that Congress was planning to impose limits on "incredibly stupid shit". Among the things that Congress was supposed to be upset about was thousands of left-over Jar Jar Binks dolls.

      Congress?!? THE Congress??? Limits on incredibly stupid shit?!?? Wow, like, man, just, whooaaa.... I'm deeply impressed, really.
    2. Re:The Onion foretold this by jcphil · · Score: 1

      If the report had been true, I think your life would have been in danger.

  104. Spoiler Alert (Maybe) by sharkey · · Score: 2

    At least now I know no major characters die at the end of the movie.

    However, thanks to the new toys released today, we know that Anakin loses his right arm at about the elbow in his hanger duel with Dooku, and Zam Wessel loses HER right arm in a nightclub scene.
    Or maybe not.

    All I know for sure is that those magnets they used to hold the severed arms onto the toys REALLY suck. Bump Anakin and his arm falls off.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:Spoiler Alert (Maybe) by dimator · · Score: 2

      and Zam Wessel loses HER right arm in a nightclub scene.

      Seriously though, you'd think Lucas could think of something else by now. This is what, the 4th arm-cutting incident in the series? With one more movie to go? Come on, use your imagination. You have Jedi to play with! Make them do something new.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    2. Re:Spoiler Alert (Maybe) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nooo! My ponytail!

    3. Re:Spoiler Alert (Maybe) by hardburn · · Score: 2

      Think of it as parrellism.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    4. Re:Spoiler Alert (Maybe) by shadowbearer · · Score: 0

      "This is what, the 4th arm-cutting incident in the series? "

      Lightsabers are dangerous. ;-)

      Don't wave it at Daddy, because Daddy will get very, very angry...

      Really, I suspect losing a limb or two (or three) would be very common lightsaber injuries.....

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:Spoiler Alert (Maybe) by sharkey · · Score: 2

      This is what, the 4th arm-cutting incident in the series?

      ANH - Ponda Baba
      ESB - Luke
      ROTJ - Vader (Prosthetic)
      AOTC - Zam Wessel, Anakin Skywalker (ROTJ setup)

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:Spoiler Alert (Maybe) by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      We know Vader lost an arm (and several other bits) in his past, so you know we're gonna see Anakin lose that arm (and several other bits) before the series is over. As much as you might dislike it, Lucas can't leave that out. Sorry.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  105. A book about film criticism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I was going to reply to this with my own arguments and counter arguments about what's good and what's bad about the film.


    But I didn't even know where to start.


    It seems to me that you could write a book about what went wrong with this film -- turn it into a complete college course: "Film Production With All the Money in the World, and How to Survive It."


    And this task is made easier by all the things that *aren't* so bad about the film. The basic plot is intriguing:


    When a peacemaking mission is sabatoged, two Jedi Knights have to use their skills to help the beautiful queen of a defenseless world. Forced to seek help on the planet Tatooine, they meet an exceptional young boy who may be more than he appears. After a surprising diplomatic defeat, the queen returns to take her world back in battle. The magnitude of the forces they face make them realize that there is more to the plot than they originally thought....

    There are different planets to see, different characters to meet, and some twists and turns along the way. Except that the suspenseful parts are predictable, the predictable parts are boring, and the rest of the movie you're wondering "What just happened?" more than "What's going to happen next?"


    There are jarring images (middle-aged men in flowing robes just *aren't* going to look right underwater),casting problems (Can't find a good enough 9-year-old? Find someone who is good enough and change the script!), weak characterizations (Qui-Jon is a Jedi and he's also...um...give me a sec), film references and...Jar-Jar.



    What the heck, here's the table of contents

    1. So You Want to Make a Film
    2. Plot Isn't Everything, See?
    3. Knowing Your Strengths Without Destroying Them
    4. How to Confuse your Audience from the Very Start
    5. Characterization I: And I Should Care about These Guys Because...?
    6. Lips as Red as a Lobster, and Other Mismatched Images
    7. Recognizing Common Racial Stereotypes Without a Visit from Rev. Sharpton
    8. Casting: Acting Matters, Even When You're Using CGI
    9. Losing the Suspense: Why Everyone Knows He'll Win the Race
    10. More Diplomatic Intrigue, Less Diplomacy
    11. The 4th Obscure Buster Keaton Reference is Three More Than Anyone Cares About.
    12. The Deadliest Villain, and How to Make Him Look Like a Loser
    13. Characterization II: Why the Kid Shouldn't be Such a Kid
    14. Destroying the Mystery in Two Minutes of Dialogue -- or Less!
    15. Merchandising for Dummies, or Why Nobody Will Ever Want an Anakin Necktie
    16. Epilogue: Let's Try That Again


    TSG

  106. How about the Broken Allegiance movie? by Hyperfrog · · Score: 0

    After seeing both trailers..

    I don't know why, but I was more excited about the new Star Wars Broken Allegiance movie than the Star Wars Episode 2 movie.

    Perhaps because the scenes presented in the BA trailer were more orientated towards the 'traditional' star wars views and themes.

    Ok, and the female Sith apprentice is cool.

    --
    Move faster
  107. Oh please... by ErikZ · · Score: 2

    You didn't cut merchandise because of any altrustic reason. You reduced the production of "Cheap plastic crap" because it wasn't selling as much as you thought it would.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  108. Quick! We need episodes III-VI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...before we all start downloading movies and burning DVDs. Me thinks that nobody will spend $80M to produce a movie if the DVD market collapses.

  109. Star Wars Ep II cereal...c'mon by Sabalon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember when I was a bit younger, some products would have tie ins...perhaps you would get a starwars toy in your frosted flakes or at McDonalds or something.

    Now they are not even trying...they just have a "Star Wars Episode II" cereal - not even trying to hide a merchandising tie in.

    What's next: "Star Wars Corn Based Merchandising with Sugar"

    1. Re:Star Wars Ep II cereal...c'mon by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd buy jar-jar brand pesticide.

  110. Re:Delusional rich man makes more crap movies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    failures repeatedly stated in many slashdot threads such as the Star Wars Christmas Special
    The more I ponder the concept of the Star Wars Christmas Special, the more I realize what an act of mad genius it was. It is so logically bizarre, sort of like a "Zeus and Hercules Christmas Special", or an "Ancient Inca Christmas Special". The whole concept is such a peculiar anachronism that it is almost beyond comprehension. When you contemplate it seriously, it makes your mind spin. Pure creative genius. It is a merging of pop culture with the sacred that is worthy of Andy Warhol. In fact, the more one thinks about it, The Star Wars Christmas Special is perhaps the zenith of Lucas's creativity. It is doubtful that he will ever achieve such heights of originality ever again.
  111. We're morons, remember? by Fortuna+Wolf · · Score: 1

    no, but it certainly takes someone alot smarter the average person.

    --
    Disclaimer:The "Human" attached to this account is unresponsible for anything unless it wants responsibility.
  112. Login by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

    email:nospam@slashdot.org
    password: nospam

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  113. Re:HOMO!, again the only thing you need to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "by DICK Veiney"
    'nuff said

  114. george lucas is the anti-christ by igottheloot · · Score: 1

    great quote from this time magazine article.

    el diablo the hack himself says, "Fans are very opinionated, and that's good. But I can't make a movie for fans."

    hey thanks george. i put your god damn kids through school asshole. along with paying for all your yarmulkes bitch.

  115. Jar jar *is* definately Jedi material. by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 2

    At the end of episode one, Annakin kept stumbling and each time he stumbled, he accidently (and unknowingly) destroyed more of the enemy. The force is really strong with you if you keep goofing up and kicking ass simultaneously. Jar jar was doing the same exact thing on the battlefield with his fellow gungans against the drones. He slips on a big elephant thingy, he kills the robots with the giant blue energy balls that fall out due to his clumsiness. He tries to rid himself of a piece of drone with a rifle that has latched onto his leg, he "accidently" ends up using the drone to blast its fellow drones. As scary as it seems, Jar jar has more metaclorins than the average Gungan, though he appears to have far less brain cells.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  116. George Lucas on future star wars marketing by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 2

    "Dis time wesa no be overstimatin da demanding for da episode two merchandise. Mesa now be blowin' all da movie makin."

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  117. Get the AOTC script by totallygeek · · Score: 1
    Text or images....can be found here.


    Here you can find a bunch of Star Wars trailer videos and spoofs.

  118. This ones going to be good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been reading plot summaries and other spoilers on the film to make sure I wanted to see this one. I guarantee that those who watched Episode I and were disappointed because it didn't have the cool action scenes, the awe-inspiring cinematics, and great Jedi lines will like this one. I am actually excited to see this and I hope others are, too because from what has been seen from the trailers, the last action sequence with Jedis versus clones and Yoda popping in to do some ass-kicking of his own will be well worth the money. I had a bad taste from Episode I, but the same way Empire left me feeling, Return of the Jedi made me feel better.

  119. Six Degrees and Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am three (or is it 4) degrees from George Lucas.

    My friend's, mom's, college roommate went to high school with Lucas.

  120. Although OT, I really have to comment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that Maxim is a porn magazine for boys who haven't seen a "barenaked lady" yet, and I don't mean the Canadian band, either.

    Why read a magazine that shows nothing you couldn't see in a Midwestern public swimming pool in 1950?

    What's going on here? It's like going to a restaurant where they only let you in blindfolded to smell the food!

  121. Fluffer Romance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...now, that sounds like something from 1977...

  122. Quoth author David Brin by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1
    By now it's grown clear that George Lucas has an agenda, one that he takes very seriously. After four "Star Wars" films, alarm bells should have gone off, even among those who don't look for morals in movies. When the chief feature distinguishing "good" from "evil" is how pretty the characters are, it's a clue that maybe the whole saga deserves a second look. Just what bill of goods are we being sold, between the frames?
    Elites have an inherent right to arbitrary rule; common citizens needn't be consulted. They may only choose which elite to follow. "Good" elites should act on their subjective whims, without evidence, argument or accountability. Any amount of sin can be forgiven if you are important enough. True leaders are born. It's genetic. The right to rule is inherited. Justified human emotions can turn a good person evil.

    That is just the beginning of a long list of "moral" lessons relentlessly pushed by "Star Wars"...

    The Brin piece is very interesting reading. Full text: http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/1999/06/15 / rin_main/print.html.

  123. Jar Jar by phunhippy · · Score: 2

    Am I the only person who like Jar-Jar from TPM? I thought he was funny! he made me laugh he was so silly! maybe i was stoned every time i saw it(good BC buds) but still he cracked me up! anyone else out there liked jar jar?

  124. If u don't like it don't watch it! by gnif · · Score: 1

    If you don't like it don't watch it. Every movie had it's good and bad points so don't complain.

  125. Whores and whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If supplying a demand makes one a whore, then we're all whores.


    Nope. If your customers are classy enough, you are a 'prostitute' or even an 'escort girl/boy'.
  126. Is Lucas Sincere or just hyping by dirvish · · Score: 1

    I wonder if George Lucas sincere about episode II being better than the first one. This could just be hype. It is nice to see him admit that the first one wasn't good. Whatever the case I will in line to see it when it comes out with the rest of the clones...err, I mean movie-goers.

  127. Blade Runner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blade Runner...

  128. WTF?? You done modding me down?? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    You realize that you're modding me down worse than the guy who originally posted the inflammatory article?

    He pasted some long ass thing without line breaks, so I suggested he start using them so that his post is readable. I didn't mind the original off-topic post, but since then I've been modded as off topic AND a troll, for a total of -3 points. I went to the partent post and he only got modded down once. Give me a break!!! When I responded to it, it had like a score of 3 'interesting'!

    *Anybody* posting, whether on or off topic, can use the advice of 'use line breaks'. As I said, modding me down as off topic since I was responding to an off topic post is fine, but taking away THREE POINTS is ridiculous!!! All I said was 'Line breaks are your friend.'

    I expect this one will get modded down too. I did turn off the +1 bonus at least. You may consider what I'm saying to be off-topic or inflammatory, but I urge you to consider how you'd feel if you lost more points to telling somebody to use line breaks (I.e. make their posts READABLE) and tell me if you think you'd react any differently.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  129. Question is, have you actually read them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not the AC above me is fully correct ...

    1. Re:Question is, have you actually read them? by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 1

      Yeah I actually read one of the Timothy Zahn books, a friend brought it on vacation and I got curious.

      Dude it's crap. My review:Mortgage payment was due, eh Tim?

      If you want some high quality action-adventure stuff try reading Zelazny's Amber series. Smart, funny, exciting, and all at an eighth grade reading level. That is much more the literary equivalent of Star Wars than any of those shitty novelizations.

  130. Just some perspective: the good stuff! by markjl · · Score: 1

    Star Wars trilogy changed our lives and had an impact on the entire US culture and still has revolutionary impacts on the movie making industry.

    It is too easy to pick apart and focus on the detriments of any project, but it's not too hard to assert the good stuff about Episode I.

    Make no mistake: there are things about Episode 1 that I disliked, but I challenge you to find and add to the good things below.

    • Jar Jar: nobody complained (to me) that he looked out of place or was too fake or CGI, so score +1 for digital actor technology.
    • Little character development/dialog: this is basic to all storytelling. There were some allusions to backstory, but I have to figure that George weighed making a 2 hr movie vs. how much to bootstrap into one movie.
      1. who didn't want more Darth Maul (c'mon: even more that 4 lines!) and who didn't want to understand the Sith better?
      2. who didn't want more Padame (Natalie Portman) and understand how she got to be in her position on this planet?
      3. who didn't want any of the Jedi (Quigong, Obi-Wan, the entire council) to be developed so we can understand some more about what's going on?
      4. who didn't want to understand Jabba the Hutt, Anikan's mother, and slavery better in the Tatooine society?
      5. where the heck did R2 come from? and how did Anikan build C3PO?
    • Accents as an alien artifact:I assume that this is the device to remind us that translation is occuring somehow - but I don't know how or why. Sometimes subtitles are used in the movie, other times not! (Watto, Greedo, Jabba)

    So the only positive thing is that with so much backstory missing - he slipped in a lot of goodies.

    1. Watto (Anikan's owner) - he is the biggest success for a digital actor - people responded to him!
    2. Jedi council and jedi fighting: tell me your heart did not pound during those fights with Darth Maul?
    3. Young Greedo (who bullies Han later in Ep 4)
    4. Anikan's relatives dismaying him (Luke's Aunt and Uncle who later raise Luke
    5. the alien races in the senate (ET's, wookies!)
    6. the traditional space fight scenes and destruction worked out fine and now we have army infantry combat, too - a masterpeice of CGI!
    7. The Pod Race was simply amazing sound and drama: despite cute aliens and annoucers.
    8. Additionally, we have incredibly rich environments: the entire undersea/planet core, the Theed palace, and the capital planet of Corescant.

    Episode 1 had warts, but the movie stands up to the franchise. The hype and the marketing were a problem, but consider the fact that 20+ years have passed since you saw Star Wars.

    No new movie will beat out revolutionary nostalga: the children will pale in the shadow of the parent.

    You are not the same person as you were 20 years ago, so give the movie a chance. Episode II will be amazing in many ways: I can't wait to spent another two+ hours in the Star Wars universe again. Can you?

    --
    My opinions are my own, but you may share them!
  131. In EP1 Quan was Oby's Master but in EP5 Oby says.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Luke you will goto dagobah .. there you will learn from Yoda, the Jedi Master who taught me"

    so whats up with that huh!!

  132. Starwars 1 = Get Smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jarjar makes mistakes that help his allies.

    Darth Vader accidentally turns on the speeder and blows up the starships.

    The only cool part in the movie was the light sabre battle

  133. Do I care? by Veritan+Drelor · · Score: 1

    Obviously I care enough to post, but beyond that? Frankly, I'd managed to put Star Wars entirely out of my mind until I saw a trailer for it in front of Blade 2.

    Now, compare this to drooling in anticipation before Phantom Menace. Downloading the trailers the instant they became available online. Being hailed as a demi-god by the people I was living with for being the first to download the trailer and get it playing. Buying the soundtrack a week before the movie even appeared. In short, alot of faith from a relatively rational person.

    This time, there's none of that. It's not that I really disliked Phantom Menace - I'll even defend Jar Jar to a point. The problem was that it didn't measure up to my (overly) high expectations, and didn't compare well with the other movies.

    There's a bright side complementing the dark though. If it turns out to be a pile of festering shite, I've only wasted a few bucks, and there's no emotional attachment. If it holds its own against the originals, we can forgive George Lucas his mistake, and go off in perfect bliss knowing that all is right with the world again.

    1. Re:Do I care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, I've read the first draft on the script ... its wonderful, I just hope it comes together on screen...

  134. Re:HOMO! by thopo · · Score: 1

    did daddy forget to fuck you up the ass tonight? thank you for your opinion, i appreciate it.

    --
    keep it simple.
  135. Less toys, how about less ads? by Thunderheart · · Score: 1

    The toys are cool, hey Big George, how about less pop-up ads and insulting flash ads that wont go away.... TH

  136. the real need is for character development by psyklopz · · Score: 1

    I remember watching episode 1, and at the end, thinking to myself:

    am i convinced that darth maul was bad?

    just cos he had red stuff on his face, and he was cloaked in black, they expected me to swallow the bit that he was pure evil.

    here's the thing: in the old movies, Vader was actually developed as a character. You *knew* he was a bad guy, cos of what he said and did. Did darth maul even say anything in the whole movie?

    I know that Lucas probably though 'well, i'm going to kill off this bad guy at the end, anyway', but that doesn't excuse sloppy character development as far as I'm concerned.

    1. Re:the real need is for character development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. Well, when the mafia shows up for your
      "insurance", the two linebackers may not say
      a word. Doesn't make them nonthreatening.

      ISTR Maul's ol' chum Sidious saying something
      along the lines of "Wipe them out. All of them."
      Perhaps I missed the scene where Maul pipes up
      "Hey boss, maybe we should try group sessions
      session first. Y'know, get to know thier inner Gungan."...

      Pretty sure he made some ominous comments about having revenge. Don't think he was lookin' for
      the ice-cube-down-the-back revenge, either.

      Finally, the fact that Obiwan had to CUT HIM IN
      HALF! (kids movie, sh'yea right...) to stop him
      at the end, sorta lends itself to the idea that,
      meybe, just maybe, ugly went right to the bone.

      Oh, and level of ugliness being the Goodness
      Factor in SW? Gimme a break, Yoda's a wrinkled
      ugly little gnome! Hardly the on the beach with
      the supermodels type. You know, the mass market concept of beauty...

      Good character development doesn't mean every little bit needs to be spelled out. That's why
      the midochlorians stuff stank so bad - a biotechnical explanation to something we _wanted_ to stay mysterious. Maul works on for me at
      that level of detail, too.

    2. Re:the real need is for character development by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Come on!!! ...

      The second Darth Vader came on screen in A New Hope we all *KNEW* he was bad. Covered from head to toe in black, face hidden, silently observign the carnage... please, at no point did anyone think, wow, this guys great! (well I did cuz i love the empire, but that came later).

      maul's character was incidental. he didn't matter. He was a pawn of Sideous, the ultimate baddie. And I think Sideous is getting GREAT character development in the back story. Why? Cuz he's important. Maul wasn't, 'nuff said.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  137. My continuing hatred of Slashdot readers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It never ceases to amaze me that Slashdot readers are generally full of shit. So self-centered and caught up in believing that they are "right" and others are "wrong." Didn't like tPM? Great, don't go see AoTC. Guess what, it will still earn gazillons, and no one will give a rats ass that some techie geeks on Slashdot think Lucas sold out, or Lucas just cares about dough. . .or M$ is trying to buy your mom. . .

    Muller

    1. Re:My continuing hatred of Slashdot readers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you.

  138. Star Wars Episode II Breakfast Cereal by jhines0042 · · Score: 2

    As seen in the local supermarket... Star Wars Episode II Breakfast Cereal. Basically Lucky Charms with "marshmellows" shaped like light saber weilding Jedi.

    Not a breakfast cereal sponsored by EpII. Its own damn cereal!

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  139. Re:In EP1 Quan was Oby's Master but in EP5 Oby say by Hassman · · Score: 1

    You gotta pay attention. In EPI its said that Yoda teaches the kids, during the very beginning of their training, for several years. Then tehy become an apprentie to a Jedi.

    So Obi-wan did learn from yoda ... he was just a wee lad at that point though.

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  140. David Brin's comments by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 2

    Some points from that article about what Lucas is having us believe:

    • Elites have an inherent right to arbitrary rule; common citizens needn't be consulted. They may only choose which elite to follow.
    • "Good" elites should act on their subjective whims, without evidence, argument or accountability.
    • Any amount of sin can be forgiven if you are important enough.
    • True leaders are born. It's genetic. The right to rule is inherited.
    • Justified human emotions can turn a good person evil.
    • But hey, I think all these points could apply to Buffy.

    Unfortunately, I couldn't read the original article because of my workplace's fascist filtering policies. However, these themes are fairly common in fantasy, which tends to glorify monarchy and aristocracy and tradition for the sake of itself. I would guess that is a holdover from our fairy tales and folktales, that were mostly composed by people for whom king and noblity were and had been the expected government for literally millenia, for whom change came in the form of rebellion, war, famine and plague, all of which were considered Bad Things.

    OTOH, I am slightly disturbed by science fiction authors (*cough* Jerry Pournelle *cough*) who uphold rule by an elite as a great idea for the future, and portray democracy as nothing more than mob rule or rule by demogogues. If this idea seems good to you, go re-read A Connecticutt Yankee in King Arthur's Court, which isn't nearly as funny as movie adaptations make it out to be--it's rather a vicious attack on the apologists for slavery and on rule by an aristocracy. Eric Flint, in his author's notes to 1632, also had some rude things to say about this trend in science fiction. (Good book, btw.)

    Most of the real myths of antiquity are too ambiguous, and have characters that are too much a mix of good and evil, too many shades of gray, and too many non-happy endings for the watered-down pap that is considered suitable for families and children these days. IMHO, the real myths have great value for children and adults of all ages, because they depict people as they really are, conflicted by emotions and desires both good and evil, and usually show the consequences of following the wrong path.

    Recommended reading along those lines: The Iliad, The Odyssey, The Ramayana, and The Mahabharata(sp?). That's just the ones I'm most familiar with; I'm still exploring the literature of mythology.

    --
    ---dragoness
    1. Re:David Brin's comments by jafac · · Score: 2

      I dunno.
      Watching current American events - I've been getting kind of turned-off on democracy lately.

      I mean, forget the electoral college. Face it, our choices were Gore or Bush. I think we were doomed - Florida or not.

      Look at the whole DMCA/SSSCA/UTICA thread from yesterday. We have to vote for a fascist neo-nazi theocracy in order to protect our fair use rights. What kind of crap is that? This country sucks, democracy sucks. The American people can't be trusted to run their own fucking country, without running it into the ground.

      What we need is a benevolent dictator. I volunteer.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  141. Making movies for the fans... by Canis+of+Ithaca · · Score: 1

    Odd. Usually, when someone "makes a movie for the fans" he's derided for selling out and people attack him for losing artistic integrity.

    However, when George Lucas decides NOT to make movie for the fans and instead make HIS OWN decisions (even if some of those are misguided) he's ripped apart.

    Maybe it's just me, but something about that doesn't add up...

  142. Lightsabers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tPM lightsaber duel (melee?) was incredible, independent of anything else in the film. I could watch it over and over. In fact I have. This fact alone gives me hope for AotC.

  143. The Phantom Menace Special Edition by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    I don't see why Lucas doesn't just release a new version of Episode I that doesn't suck, and offer it to the public as a "Special Edition" version.

    Oh yeah, because then he'd have to give the Phantom Editor credit for coming up with the idea first.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  144. Star Wars McDonalds of Movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    poor rip off of Lord of Rings and evrything else.
    The first one had effects that blew you away.
    The rest is riding on momentum from that film
    which dates pretty bad.
    Rings Rules.

  145. Who cares? What about The Two Towers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Lord Of The Rings tosses Star Wars aside for
    the gnat that it is.
    Star Wars is rip off of rip off of rip off.
    American Graffiti is the better film by Lucas.

  146. But we are his Johns! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas may be a "Consumer Whore", but we are his willing "Johns"! Not to mention that we do seem to be affecting his story. For example, the phenom of "Bobo Fett", a minor character in episodes 5/6 has been noticed, and he (and his father, Jango) will figure in episode 2.

  147. Re:HOMO!, again the only thing you need to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't give a rats ass about rating, karma, bothering to register so everyone knows what clever name I thought of for myself, or what you call me (yeah same AC talking to the same shaved ape who fancies he has a wit) cause who really fucking cares anyway.

    Original poster had a point. You don't have one other than to hurl a weak-assed insult. Nothing but another oxygen thief with a keyboard.

  148. My offensive joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In honor of Jar-Jar's second film, and thus George Lucas' valiant attempts to ressurect America's nearly-dead art of the Negro Pratfall, I present the following joke:

    (ahem)

    (dramatic pause)

    (drumroll)

    "Does Senator Jar-Jar get a full vote, or just a three-fifths representation?"

    (cymbal crash)

    (groans, threats screamed)

    "Ha HA! Who's the bigger knob-slobber, the knob-slobber or the knob-slobber who slobs his knob? Think about it, folks. GOODNIGHT!"

    (liquor bottles, squealing pigs thrown on stage)

    (curtain)