Slashdot Mirror


Options for Adults with Renewed Interest in Math?

Internet Ninja asks: "After only doing mathematics in high school level and in my first year of University, I've suddenly developed an interest in mathematics. Since that was now almost 10 years ago I'm a little rusty. Anything past pythagoras is a little tough for me :) but I know I could get back up to speed quickly. I could probably steal my daughters math textbooks and start reading but I'm wondering if there is a better way. I considered a part-time University paper at US$495 each and you need to do two as bridging courses in order to even start on undergraduate courses. A bit pricey when you have a home and family to look after as well. Another option was a night courses but I'm kept pretty busy with work. Does anyone have any advice or good resources?"

595 comments

  1. Go buy a book by newt_sd · · Score: 1, Informative

    amazon has lots of books and probably some on math go read like everyone else. How do you think the /. crowd gets up on the latest programming language? By running back to college? NO by reading and studying just go do it geesh

    --
    ***I GOT NUTHIN***
    1. Re:Go buy a book by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well, I read a lot. I do mean a lot. I graduated w/a degree in History. You can learn a ton from reading books about History but books about Math are more difficult to learn from IMHO.

      I never had difficulty learning the examples. I could do any problem pretty much that relied on the examples in the book. When I needed to apply something else that wasn't taught to the T in the book I had a bit of a hard time w/that.

      Math for me is something that would have to be taught in a classroom not from a book.

    2. Re:Go buy a book by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All right, so a lot of the replies to you thus far have said that reading a book is a good way to do it, but I think for a lot of the higher level stuff, it'll be hard to learn it from a book.

      I think programming/development/etc are differenct since you can actually apply those concepts in the real world, but from the sounds of the original poster, the amount of math he'll actually use is minimal . . . sounds like he wants to learn it for the sake of learning, and more power to him for that, but without some sort of application/repetition, it'll be real hard to learn it . . . which is why I think a college classroom is probably the best way for him to go . . . and like many others have posted, community college is a good option . . .

    3. Re:Go buy a book by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      I would venture, that to someone with a strong interest in Math, a good math book could be a strong source of information. Sort of like all my computer books look like gibberish to all my friends but make perfect sense (well except the vb one) to me.

      Back in college, I learned most of my practical Math from the text and used the classes/teacher as a supplement. You learn more principles and caveats from a class, but the vast quantity of information is best gotten from books. I mean, 5 yrs after the class is over, the professor is living as a hermit on the top of some mountain in the Andes, but you still have your copy of Haliday and Resnick on your shelf.

    4. Re:Go buy a book by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      For me, the professor was like the annoying paperclip in Office. Everytime I had a question about something in the text, I'd raise my hand to access the class help function and would then receive an incomplete answer... In the end,I'd look up the information through a 3rd party source online.

    5. Re:Go buy a book by SN74S181 · · Score: 3, Informative

      A good general book that I picked up a few years ago and am slowly working my way through is 'Mathematics From the Birth of Numbers' by Jan Gullberg.

      It provides a very intelligent of the whole topic of Mathematics, from the point of view of an adult reader wanting to learn more. The author goes into a lot of the interesting historical and cultural background behind the math.

      It's truly a book that belongs in everyone's library.

    6. Re:Go buy a book by cpparm · · Score: 1

      If you mean to learn REAL math, it will be hard to learn from a book by yourself. As a matter of fact, I don't think you can teach yourself, say, information theory, as a hobby. You need at least a tutor. For the poster who compared serious math to programming, not to be rude, but it's simply not appropriate.
      Also, there are many topics in math. Are you interested in numerical analysis, neural network, coding theory, or at least dosens of other rather broad areas? Well, I guess it's a test of your true love for maths to see if you can stick around long enough to answer this question.

    7. Re:Go buy a book by kap1 · · Score: 1

      Another good book for learning higher math is How to Read and Do Proofs: An Introduction to Mathematical Thought Processes . Definitely not for beginners, but an excellent introduction to "real" math. You don't need calculus, but you need to know what Real numbers and Integers are.

    8. Re:Go buy a book by Darby · · Score: 3

      You can learn a ton from reading books about History but books about Math are more difficult to learn from IMHO.

      This is true, but it is due to the difficult nature of the material being presented. There is a huge difference between reading *and deeply understanding* "George Washington was the first president of the US", and "A Function F from A to B is called continuous on a set A if and only for every open set C in F(A) ( a subset of B ) the inverse image of C under F is open in A."

      The first is a simple statement of fact, the second is simply a definition. To understand the first takes almost no effort. To understand the second, you have to know and understand the definition of Set, Open set, Function, Domain, Range, Inverse Image, and Subset. You also have to put these concepts together in a new way and form some sort of picture in your mind of something it's impossible to take a picture of.

      I'm not bagging on history, and I know that there are much more difficult concepts than my example.
      The point is that you can't "read" a math book. If you want to get anything out of it you have to take time to understand every subtle concept. Every sentence depends critically on almost every previous sentence in not just that book, but every book that came before. I took a graduate class in real analysis my senior year, and our book was about the size of The Catcher in the Rye. We got through about a third of it in the entire year. I spent a week understanding a single page from the book at times.

      I never had difficulty learning the examples. I could do any problem pretty much that relied on the examples in the book. When I needed to apply something else that wasn't taught to the T in the book I had a bit of a hard time w/that.

      This is the point of that thing called "learning". High school is one thing, but at college level, the point is that you are presented with concepts and you take those and apply them to new ideas in new ways. I know you are just doing it out of personal interest, rather than for a degree or something, but if you do want to take a step past books about math for the lay person, it does take a certain level of commitment.

      Math for me is something that would have to be taught in a classroom not from a book.

      A classroom setting might help somewhat in some areas, but even then it requires quite a bit of work to wrap your head around some of the concepts. Having other people to discuss it with makes a huge difference, but there is no way around spending time wrestling with some very abstract concepts.

    9. Re:Go buy a book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, yeah. And some of their employees. They use Windows! Yeah! And one time, at

    10. Re:Go buy a book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was one of the best posts I've read on Slashfot. Bar none.

    11. Re:Go buy a book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if only I could spell...

      SlashDot dammit. SLASHDOT!

    12. Re:Go buy a book by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      The best mathematics text that I have come across is KA Strouds book
      http://www.palgrave.com/stroud/

      This book has a very practical hands on approach with everything broken up into manageable steps. It is also full of questions and examples - making it ideal for working through on your own.

      I should buy a copy myself and work my way through it again.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    13. Re:Go buy a book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps.

      But perhaps this individual is primarily an auditory, rather than a visual, learner.

      It should also be pointed out that while it is relatively easy and common to acquire a new programming language from a reference on that langauge, few learn their first programming language (wherein they learn to program in the first place) in this fashion.

      It is a far different proposition to learn to speak than it is to learn to speak spanish, and new fields of mathematics are often akin to former rather than the latter.

      If a class or a series of classes would be appropriate, by all means let him take one.

    14. Re:Go buy a book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. So much of my time at the old University was a complete waste. So much of the money that Uncle Sam, my parents, and I spent went into:

      A)anal retentive professors who couldn't teach, didn't want to teach, and didn't even try.
      B)A huge university bureaucracy intent on spending gobs of money for more and more computers that will be "obsolete" in a years time, business ventures aimed at getting more money out of the students, varsity sports, African American Cultural Centers and other examples of PC rubbish, student organizations that no one would have anything to do with, cheezy (and very PC) performances at the student center, stupid public service campaigns, extension services that the no one ever used, buses that were so slow and late that walking was preferable, and outdoor "artwork".... while the university library was cutting its hours, many students were stuck in makeshift housing, and the all the other on-campus students were dealing with broken plumbing, old radiators, and the total lack of air conditioning in the summer.
      and C) rediculously expensive dumbed down textbooks, often written by the professor teaching the course, frequently sold only by the official university textbook store, whose profits go into scholarships to help other students meet the constantly rising costs of getting a college "education".

      There are two types of university freshmen. The first isn't prepared to go into college, thanks to our public highschools and parents who lovee their little brat so much that they didn't give a damn how he/she performed academically. Those rarely make it to graduation. The other type has done the best with what he/she had, but will have to get used to being screwed over by the instituion that they will be spending 4 or more likely 5 or more years in before they happily manage to escape it.

      The truth is that colleges and universities are outdated, coming from a time when books and literacy were a very rare and priceless thing. Undergraduate education at least has devolved from real scholarship to spoon-feeding.

  2. Math for Dummies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this count?

    1. Re:Math for Dummies? by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      hrmm i clicked that link.
      adn down the page they put this:
      Great Buy
      Buy this book with Shakedown: Exposing the Real Jesse Jackson today!

      Total List Price: $46.94
      Buy Together Today: $32.86

      What could the 2 possibly do with one another

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    2. Re:Math for Dummies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one degree of separation:

      People who read the book are dummies

      People who follow or payoff jessie Jackson are dummies.

  3. take night courses by kaisyain · · Score: 1

    You want to learn, right? That takes time, right? You won't have any more time if you do self-study in a book, you'll just have fewer resources to help you over the stumbling blocks.

    1. Re:take night courses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I took night courses for 6 years, while working 40 hrs/wk, to finish my degree. Do self study and find someone strong in algebra, whatever, to help you out when in need. You will never regret it. OH! Throw that damn TV out the window. You will never learn anything watching that crap. Community colleges are great (and inexpensive) if you have one near.

  4. 2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    community college -- cheap and laid-back courses that'll give you the background you want.

    1. Re:2 words by dirvish · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree. I took 4 math classes at my local community college and enjoyed them all. The professors were better than some of the ones at the University I attend now. It was very affordable, about $13 per unit plus a few fees and a book.

    2. Re:2 words by gerf · · Score: 1

      and unless you want to be a mathematician, or research engineer, the best way to go.

      to quote an engineer at our Institute of Technology (which does research for gov't projects, high level stuff) "why are you taking calculus classes at "-my university-"? they're math department is horrible! go take them at "-the main community college-.

      i personally couldn't get enough out of just reading a book. i wouldn't have the patience or self discipline to set a work schedule for them. so, i also suggest finding an online course. even if it's not an accredited school, it's just a refresher really. good luck!

    3. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ..."why are you taking calculus classes at "-my university-"? they're math department is horrible!...

      I think what he meant was "Why aren't you taking English classes?" "They're" is a contraction of the words "they" and "are." The word you're looking for is "their" which describes something possessed by a group.

    4. Re:2 words by Falrick · · Score: 2, Informative
      I did the same thing recently but at a greater cost. Two things to be aware of when taking math classes (the second of which is more likely at a community college than a university):

      1. Calculator 101: Some math classes are taught as "How to do math with your calculator". I ran into this when taking some basic math class refreshers at a community college (college algebra, geometry). We spent about 15 minutes discussing a problem type, and then the next hour 15 learning how to solve the problems using our fancy TI calculators. My Analytic Trig class was completely different. We spent most of our time learning the good ol' fashion pen-and-paper methods, and then about 15 minutes looking at calculator alternatives. Find out what kind of class you are signing up for and check those drop pollicies!

      2. Welcome back to high-school: This seems common with community colleges, though I'm sure there are exceptions. The math classes that I took at my community college made me feel like I was back in high-school. Pollicies such as mandatory attendance or graded home work assignments put a bit of a damper on my attitude towards the classes. Granted, the homework policy motivated me more to actually do my homework, it was sometimes difficult when balancing work, home and school.
      --
      something clever
    5. Re:2 words by Angron · · Score: 1

      Damn, that is the most blatantly elitist comment I've seen here in a long time. If you read the story the guy obviously isn't someone living off mom, or following any of the other stereotypes you rattled off. He's not going there as his college of choice, he's taking a class. He's not looking for protest marches or art exhibitions (neither of which requires actual college enrollment really).

      It almost sounds like you are trying to justify thinking that you really are a better person than any person who'd even consider a community college.

      Ugh, I've never wanted to be able to mod as 'flamebait' so much in my life. Attitudes like yours are disgusting.

      -A

    6. Re:2 words by JThaddeus · · Score: 2

      Agreed! I retook calculus in a JC 15 years after nearly failing it in college. The second time around I loved it! And JC's often have better teachers for those courses than do universities.

      --
      "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
    7. Re:2 words by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      a real adult doesn't have time for all that stuff.
      You elitist pig, get with reality.
      Literacy consists of consulting the TV Guide.
      Art exhibitions are your kids scribblings taped to the fridge.
      Protest marches occur nightly at bedtime.

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    8. Re:2 words by gerf · · Score: 1

      whoa, my bad... i just typed and submitted.. and i'm usually good at catching that crap! and dis be modded down to an offtopic...

    9. Re:2 words by Grieveq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with you there on the community college thing. I took all my calculus courses at a community college and I learned a lot more from my professors there then I did at the University when I took diff eq. The small classroom sizes and the ability to reach professors much more easily makes CC a real plus. I came into college not knowing what I wanted to do and really disliking math, and now I'm a Electrical Engineering major!

      Good luck at whatever you do.

    10. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree with the advice of going
      to a community college at night. In fact,
      I am doing this right now to learn electronics.
      Already having a masters degree in computer
      science, I recently found that math, physics,
      and electrical engineering interest me. The
      a 3 credit class cost me about $39. The book
      was $50. What a deal! The quality of the
      instruction is surprisingly good.

      Go for it!

      -- Peter

    11. Re:2 words by dirvish · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I had to buy a $90 TI-83 also. It was good for all 4 classes though.

    12. Re:2 words by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      even if it's not an accredited school

      Hey, I get email offering me college degrees from them all the time!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    13. Re:2 words by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2
      You elitist pig, get with reality. Literacy consists of consulting the TV Guide.

      That may be your reality, and it is a sad one. Kill your TV and regain your life. Soon you'll be dead. "I wish I had watched more TV!"

    14. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      For the lower end classes (pre-calc, calculus, etc) I found the Community College's to have more experienced teachers.

      Many of the pre-calc or calc classes at the university I went to where taught by inexperienced grad students, in which many had an extreme amount of trouble with the english language.

    15. Re:2 words by MxTxL · · Score: 2

      I had exactly the same experience... Calc 1 & 2 were great at the community college... i understood everything and loved it. Meet Dif Eq at the main University and suddenly i was not understanding anything, and only passed because it's possible to memorize the problem solving procedures in that class without totally understanding everything.

    16. Re:2 words by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Deal with it.

      Attitudes like mine are remarkably prevalent among the educated elite (thank you for noticing). You'd know if you ever spent any time in an institute of higher learning.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    17. Re:2 words by daanger0us · · Score: 1

      Laid back?? Well, that all depends on the teacher you had. When I took calculus in Community College, my professor was from a 4 year that wanted to teach smaller class sizes. She was definately NOT laid back.

      I had at least 20 hours of homework a week plus continuous 2 week projects and a 4 week final project. That accumulated to about 30 hours of homework per week. Luckily the only other class I was taking at the time was Chinese, otherwise I would have been in a world of hurt.

      --
      Aliens? Magnetic Rings?! Bah! Who needs that when we have
    18. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Educated elite"? Ha! You need some education in "Real World 101" with a major in Social Behaviour. You might learn a thing or two and will probably live longer.

    19. Re:2 words by El_Nofx · · Score: 2

      Well said. I just finished my first year at a real college (NDSU). For the two previous years I was going to a community college in my hometown. Talk about black and white. I thought I hadn't graduated from high school for the first year. Any class you take at a 2 year school will require half the effort, half the time and will teach you about 1/4 as much as taking it at 4 year university. Plus the point about "Math with a calculator" hit the nail on the head. If you don't buy a TI-86, 89, or 92 you will not be able to take alot of these math classes. That is definitely what we spend most of our time doing, learning how to graph functions and things on the TI. There is one benefit of that though, if you teacher is a real dope and you get bored, you can install tetris or some other game on your calc, just sit in the back and wheeeew, that hour went by fast!

      If you are farmiliar up to pathagorean theorms then I would recomend starting at either Trig or the first level of Calc. Being a EE major I have to take through Diff Eq. It is sad to think how far i have to go!. Well, Good luck man!

      --
      It's not the OS it's the user that sucks. If it's user friendly, you get stupider people. - clinko
    20. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only passed because it's possible to memorize the problem solving procedures in that class without totally understanding everything.

      According to a lot of stuff I've read, it is not possible to really understand DiffEq unless you have much more graduate level math. Memorizing those seemly ad hoc procedures is about all you can do, and all that is expected of you.

    21. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing pissed me off more about my first calculus class in college (Clemson) than the fact that it WAS Calculator 101. I knew how to do the material with a pencil and paper, but thats not what the teacher wanted, he wanted it done with the calculator. The final exam had questions like "Write down the buttons you press on the calculator to solve this problem." Needless to say i was soured on the math department from then on... in retrospect i guess i should have just kicked the guy in the shins.

    22. Re:2 words by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's what all my physics professors said when I asked them WTF questions.

      This cowboy has slowed down.

    23. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Community college is like a night club:
      "Here's ten dollars. Imma get my learn on!"

    24. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, that is the most blatantly elitist comment I've seen here in a long time.

      Um, no. Think of all the anti-MS crap that's posted here nearly daily.

    25. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protest marches? Shit, when I was in CC in the early 80s we had protests every other weekend and punk gigs on campus in-between that we organized ourselves. And as for hicks, the CC I went to was in the heart of downtown while the universities were all in the burbs. The downside was we had a lot of rapes and murders on campus, but those were tough economic times. Yes kids, things will be exciting again soon.

    26. Re:2 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no shit?

      think it might be because differential equations are about a million times harder?

      the problem is that mathematicians devoted their lives to the study of differential equations, and there's tons of unsolved problems problems. calculus is pretty much trivial.

      i'll bet you a million dollars that differential equations are hard

    27. Re:2 words by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      No it's not a sad reality. What I was obscurely getting at is most Adults that attempt to continue their education don't have time for all the fluff thats involved with the university scene.
      They are too busy living life, raising kids, etc.
      I realize now that the parent of my comment was trolling, but there's no room that other stuff when brightest part of you day is figuring out how a 2.5 ft tall 2yr old managed to get cookies off a 4 ft counter.

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
  5. Community colleges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I realize you say you're busy with work, but some community colleges have a wide number of options for classes, or even open exit/open entry classes. You don't even need to take it for a grade, you can audit it and not feel too bad if you don't do well.

    1. Re:Community colleges by BlueRain · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Start at the community College level, and see if you want to continue.

      Doing math alone quickly gets lonely.

      And I agree: Family first. I'd rather have a family than a degree.

    2. Re:Community Colleges by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      $67/credit? How do you arrive at that figure? At the community college I'm going to the fees breaks down basically like this:

      $11/(unit|credit)
      $12/session in other fees
      $60-120 for books
      $40/session for parking (or $1 per day, which may be cheaper)

      For the Calculus series I took it works out to about $40/credit (3 semesters at 4 credits each, plus parking, plus $150 in books to cover the whole series). Even for a one semester class I estimate $44/credit.

      The cost goes up if you consider your time, of course. 4 hours of class a week plus 2-3 times that for homework can add up pretty quick. Also it would be more if I had a degree. For CA CCs tuition is $11/credit normally for residents, and up to $125/credit for non-residents and people with 4-year degrees (I don't remember the exact breakdown, as it doesn't apply to me, but I do remember the upper cap, as it seemed like a lot).

      Anyway, just curious how you arrived at that figure.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    3. Re:Community Colleges by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      $67.00 a credit hour here. I can't stress this enough, tuition doesn't get any cheaper than that anywhere in the US.

      Wow. Tuition at the CC i'm enrolled at is something on the order of 35 or so per hour...of course this also might explain why they were having trouble paying the teachers towards the end of last semsetr....

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    4. Re:Community Colleges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's $62.50/credit hour at the CC i go to.
      Not great, but the next cheapest school is three times as much (if my math is correct). So the first two years of undergrad is still a lot cheaper at CC.
      All the math professors here are great. Lots of applications, of course, but if you pay attention, you can learn a lot of theory as well.

    5. Re:Community Colleges by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      All the math professors here are great. Lots of applications, of course, but if you pay attention, you can learn a lot of theory as well.

      Same at my CC.Instruction is generally focused on application, but if you ask they'll go as deep into the theory as you care to.

      One thing I've noticed, though, is that the more focused an instructor is on application, the more the students seem to learn, and that also corelates with a lower drop rate.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  6. The Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a great resource out there.. I'll give you one hint: Al Gore invented it. The Internet.

    1. Re:The Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can I find out more about "The Internet"? It sure sounds exciting. Is it expensive? Do I need to be very smart to use it?

  7. Don't buy from amazon by cicatrix1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    buy from B&N.

    --

    I know more than you drink.
    1. Re:Don't buy from amazon by martyn+s · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, because amazon is evil, but B&N isn't, right? Get with it.

    2. Re:Don't buy from amazon by cetan · · Score: 1

      B&N is evil, it's just /less/ evil than Amazon :)

      People should be buying from independant book sellers anyway, but that's another topic.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    3. Re:Don't buy from amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B&N is evil, it's just /less/ evil than Amazon :)

      Barnes and Noble is to booksellers as McDonalds is to restaurants. Speaking as someone who reads several books a month (down from several/week thanks largely to the 'net), I found B&N to be the worst bookstore I have ever been in. Crappy selection and crappy service. Aside from the whole One-Click thing, what is so bad about Amazon?

      For the record, I usually shop at independents or Borders, I use Amazon to get the technical stuff that I cannot get reliably elsewhere. (Like hardcore math books!)

    4. Re:Don't buy from amazon by maniac11 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Buy from Powell's. They're less evil than either of the others... and you haven't lived until you've spent a Saturday in their City of Books [pdf].

      --
      Guvegrra?
    5. Re:Don't buy from amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon is evil'er than the rest of them, usually people prefer to go shop there because of the sheer size of their catalogue. But in all honesty, you can find it just as easily by going elsewhere, try
      www.bestwebbuys.com it's one of those search engines that'll dig around the web for the cheapest price for your item and place them in a side by side comparison, usually Amazon's the most expensive item. I wouldn't even use them for the reviews, www.epinions.com has a better way of handling customer reviews, i.e, they show all of them, not just the good ones.
      Oh, and uh, they treat their employees like sh*t. (trust me, I'd know)

    6. Re:Don't buy from amazon by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 2
      For the record, I usually shop at independents or Borders, I use Amazon to get the technical stuff that I cannot get reliably elsewhere.

      Unfortunately, online, Borders *is* Amazon.

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    7. Re:Don't buy from amazon by einer · · Score: 2

      Or, if you want to pay the LOWEST price (and don't care which souless corporation you're giving money too), go to bestbookbuys.com. It's a meta-search comparative shopping site that checks 10 or so sites for the book you're looking for by ISBN.

  8. Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1) It's been a while since I was in college, but I can't remember the prof ever giving a damn about who showed up for his classes.

    2) If you don't have grey hairs, you can probably pass for a student with a little creative wardrobe work.

    Given premises 1) and 2) above... well, do the math.

    (The best part? You don't even have to show up for the exams!)

  9. Check out Dover books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    at www.doverpublishing.com. Their books are better and cheaper than most of the competition.

  10. I dont know where you are by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 3, Insightful

    but here in the US I would take a community college course or two, they are WAY cheaper than the 'real' universities. (and just as good in my opinion, all the learning with none of the liberalism)

    1. Re:I dont know where you are by NotoriousGIB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, community colleges are the way to go. I'm not sure about the "none of the liberalism" comment though as I went from being a conservative christian to a liberal democrat after attending community college in VA for a few years. I see this as an added bonus but I doubt the original poster would agree. :-)

    2. Re:I dont know where you are by gid-goo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm going to done the flame throwing gear and wade in to this.
      I don't know where you are but I've never been to a place where a community college could compare to any but the weakest of universities. It's like VoTec or something. If you want a bunch of kids who are too dumb, lazy or cheap to go to a real college or university, go to a community college. Everyone there is basically bullshitting each other in to believing that they're getting the same education they would at a 'real' university.
      It's basically all the credits, none of the work. To the original question: Go somewhere that will kick your teeth in and make you do the work.

    3. Re:I dont know where you are by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2

      Once again, I don't know where you are, but here in Minnesota, the community colleges are very good. I hear they are not as good out east. After attending both the UofM and some local community colleges, I have to give the nod to the community colleges. Smaller class size, more individualized help, etc. Of course the UofM doesn't necessarily represent other big colleges as the UofM has some big problems compared to to others.

    4. Re:I dont know where you are by Clue4All · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Regardless of your experiences, there are some decent community colleges around. Why would he want to pay the huge prices on large universities to take some math classes when his obvious intent is learning for the sake of learning?

      --

      Is your browser retarded?
    5. Re:I dont know where you are by cswiii · · Score: 2

      Yeah, you'd be wise to don the asbestos, because that is a flaming generalization.

      In Northern Virginia, NOVA is, all things considered, a pretty good setup despite the disparaging remarks about "NOVA High", etc. No, this isn't an alumni endorsement -- although I did take a World War II history class there about a year ago at the local campus.

      For what it's worth, however, that history class was an amazing experience, with the professor bringing in guest speakers such as holocaust survivors and the pilot of the original Air Force One.

      Furthermore, this professor didn't cut anyone any slack, either. It was a pretty tough course -- which of course, I forgot to audit, so I had to do all the work :>

    6. Re:I dont know where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...a bunch of kids who are too dumb, lazy or cheap...


      Hence the lack of liberalism.

    7. Re:I dont know where you are by Lish · · Score: 2

      Agreed, community college might be a good way to ease into it. Especially for "refresher" courses, where you've had the material before (but years ago) and would not be _completely_ relearning it. Much less $$$, and frankly college trig/calc (the freshman-level type stuff) is pretty much the same no matter where you go. Then once you've gotten past the basics, if you want more advanced stuff, try a 4-year school, where there's likely to be more variety in what you can study.

      --
      "This message is composed of 100% recycled electrons."
    8. Re:I dont know where you are by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      ...I went from being a conservative christian to a liberal democrat...

      Ah. So democrats are the opposite of christians....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    9. Re:I dont know where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, while I was attending the U of M there was a fantastic math prof there. Useful, interesting (math, interesting?!?) texts, real-world example problems, non-obnoxious finals that really tested whether we learned anything in the course or not. Had him for my whole second year, I learned a LOT of math. AFAIK he's at Colby College in Maine now.

      The third year I was there IIRC I had Goldman for combinatorics and graph theory. He's an excellent instructor as well. Some days I even remember what "n choose 1/2" is for.

      Of course the first year I was there I had the instructor of suck. Yeah, I learned math, but he handed out 20-page finals of problems to solve that were extensions of homework problems. Yay.

    10. Re:I dont know where you are by dmarx · · Score: 1

      I am going to be taking come classes at a community college myself. Despite what some posters say about cc students, I am notdumb, lazy, etc. I am going to be a senior in high school in Sept, and want to get come credits now. However, there is no 4 year college within reasonable driving distance. The community college is the best option for me.

      --
      "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
    11. Re:I dont know where you are by Lictor · · Score: 5, Informative

      (Also in response to all of the comments/flames below)

      A *huge* part of which is "better" depends entirely on the instructor. I've seen fantastic University professors, and fantastic college Instructors.

      One thing is for sure though: College will be cheaper, and University will have more depth. I'm sorry to all the flaming college advocates, but in general you simply will not find hard-core mathematicians working at a community college.

      If you want basic multivariable calculus, maybe a little bit of algebra.. yes, college is they way to go. If you are serious about a deep study of mathematics... you simply cannot beat training with people who are ACTUALLY ACTIVELY DOING IT. University professors, as part of their jobs, are required to engage in active research in their field of study. The same is not generally true of college instructors.

      I'm *not* putting down colleges by ANY stretch of the imagination. I'm just saying that colleges tend to focus more on "pratical mathematics" (e.g. "here is the math you need to be an engineering tech"...) whereas a University math department will focus on "theoretical mathematics" (I feel silly typing that.. but you get the point). It really just comes down to what you're interested in learning, and what you want to do with that knowledge.

      In any case, good luck to you and welcome to the wonderful world of mathematics!

    12. Re:I dont know where you are by coult · · Score: 1

      I'm *not* putting down colleges by ANY stretch of the imagination. I'm just saying that colleges tend to focus more on "pratical mathematics" (e.g. "here is the math you need to be an engineering tech"...) whereas a University math department will focus on "theoretical mathematics" (I feel silly typing that.. but you get the point). It really just comes down to what you're interested in learning, and what you want to do with that knowledge.

      You seem confused about the difference between a university, a community college, and a 4-year undergraduate college. When you say "college," it appears you mean "community college." Most of what you say doesn't actually apply to 4-year undergraduate colleges.

      --

      All is Number -Pythagoras.

    13. Re:I dont know where you are by gotih · · Score: 2

      my experience (at the community college of allegheny county) was that classes such as history, basic science, english and even economics were good. but the computer classes (i took java, c, vb and sql) and math courses (algerbra II and calc) were poor at best. my main complaint was that the course material didn't move fast enough but there were also problems with some teachers who didn't seem prepared or weren't accessible.

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    14. Re:I dont know where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah. So democrats are the opposite of christians....

      ...and therefore have -4 to control.

    15. Re:I dont know where you are by chrsbrwn · · Score: 1

      you might want to take off your red white and blue glasses :)

      hint: sometimes different dialects have different meanings for the same words :P

    16. Re:I dont know where you are by Aknaton · · Score: 1

      >Ah. So democrats are the opposite of christians....

      They would be smarter then I give them credit for if they were.

    17. Re:I dont know where you are by NotoriousGIB · · Score: 1

      :-P If you believe the conservative christians then answer is a resounding yes. Of course, as a liberal democrat I'd have to say that the Christian social ethic jives well with my liberalism and is a much closer match in fact.

    18. Re:I dont know where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feel bad about being modded down. That's a very obscure joke.

    19. Re:I dont know where you are by Cougar1 · · Score: 1

      A *huge* part of which is "better" depends entirely on the instructor. I've seen fantastic University professors, and fantastic college Instructors.

      I completely agree. The instructor can make all the difference. Unfortunately, my University math experience was quite poor (I was a Math minor). My calculus professor was good, but after that I got stuck with two Chinese grad students and a Japanese teacher, none of whose English was really acceptable. In my multi-variable calculus class it took several class sessions before I realized what my teacher meant by the "Wee-wector" (v-vector). Actually, the second Chinese grad student spoke reasonably well, but after 2 semesters of incomprehensible math teachers, I was so out of the habit of paying attention that I didn't really get much from him either. I did still manage to get A's and B's, but my understanding and enthusiasm were seriously hampered.

      If you want basic multivariable calculus, maybe a little bit of algebra.. yes, college is they way to go. If you are serious about a deep study of mathematics... you simply cannot beat training with people who are ACTUALLY ACTIVELY DOING IT. University professors, as part of their jobs, are required to engage in active research in their field of study. The same is not generally true of college instructors.

      I would disagree a little bit. I think that Community Colleges are great for the subjects that they cover. So, I would recommend taking the basic courses there, since they are cheaper and the instruction is likely to be just as good. However, few Community Colleges offer much beyond simple Calculus, so you will eventually end up at a University if you want to go into mutli-variable calculus, differential equations, or any advanced math topics.

      As others have mentioned, self-study with a good book can be a cheaper alternative. The drawbacks are: 1) no one is pushing you to complete assignments, so you will have to be quite self-motivated, and 2) if you get stumped, no one is available to help you out. One solution to this second issue is to post questions on an appropriate Usenet newsgroup. I know of several math related groups including:

      alt.algebra
      alt.algebra.help
      sci.math.*

    20. Re:I dont know where you are by waveman · · Score: 1

      I had a similar situation recently when I wanted to learn some math for learning about quantum mechanics.

      I just went and bought some books. The text books these days are so much better than they used to be. I had no trouble at all. Well, you have to work your way through the books ;-)

      P.S. After all that, the math doesn't really help to understand the 'philosophical' aspects of of quantum machanics e.g. does God play dice with the universe, non-locality, the possibility of hidden variable theories etc.

    21. Re:I dont know where you are by Lictor · · Score: 2

      You are 100% correct. My bad. Although I disagree that "(I) seem to be confused...". Rather, I am using a colloquialism from my regional dialect of English (which, given the international audience of Slashdot, is inappropriate).

      In Canada when one refers to a "college" it is automatically implied that one means "community college". For the purposes of my post, a 4-year undergraduate college in the U.S. would, in fact, fall under the category of "University".

      Sorry for the confusion and thanks for pointing that out.

    22. Re:I dont know where you are by Internet+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I should have specified that the price of the course was not USD but AUD (Australian) dollars which is more relatively speaking that US dollars. The /. guys put that in.

      We do have a community college of sorts but it's rather sporadic.

    23. Re:I dont know where you are by The+Madpostal+Worker · · Score: 2

      Offtopic, but my favorite NOVA disparaging comment was "NOVA where the N stands for Knowledge"

      that and their old slogan of "Nova, Knowledge, Now"

      --

      /*
      *Not a Sermon, Just a Thought
      */
    24. Re:I dont know where you are by nica · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that many community colleges offer transfer classes for the big local universities. These classes are usually nearly identical to the classes at the more expensive colleges, and are sometimes even taught by the same professors. You might find that the community college will offer the basic courses in math (like 1st year calc) for less money, in smaller classes, and with more flexible scheduling. This is from the experience here in the Seattle area. Your results may vary.

    25. Re:I dont know where you are by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      > One thing is for sure though: College will be
      > cheaper, and University will have more depth. I'm
      > sorry to all the flaming college advocates, but in
      > general you simply will not find hard-core
      > mathematicians working at a community college.

      So, when a College upgrades to a University (of which I've known of several), does this automatically convert the classes to have more depth when the faculty remains nearly the same?

    26. Re:I dont know where you are by Pig+Bodine · · Score: 1

      The faculty and courses don't remain nearly the same if they expect the upgrade to work
      credibly. This change usually involves a plan
      for new courses. Subsequent hiring will also
      take the change into account. College and University are not arbitrary labels.

    27. Re:I dont know where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you are confused about the use of the english language in areas other than you stupid hick town.

      So shut the fuck up, and get a life, you retard.

    28. Re:I dont know where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are blaming your problems on the fact that you couldn't be bothered to figure out the accent of someone who wasn't a 100%, pure-bred, American boy (or girl!).

      Good for you.

      Asshole....

    29. Re:I dont know where you are by Cougar1 · · Score: 1

      Believe me, I tried very hard to understand the instructors and I am in general quite patient when working with non-native English speakers. It's one thing if the professor has a mild accent, or is willing to acknowledge his language struggles and work extra hard to help the students to understand by providing extra office hours or inviting students to meet one-on-one in an environment where language barriers can be overcome. However, if the instructor is defensive about his language difficulties and blames the students for not understanding him even becoming hostile, it is very hard to get by. The fact that over 50% of the class got D's or worse should have been a clue to the University that this professor (the Japanese instructor) wasn't suited to teaching. Certainly, he was a very competent mathmatician, but being good at math isn't the only qualification for teaching it.

  11. www.math.com by T.Monk · · Score: 1, Informative

    www.math.com has some good resources you might wanna investigate... bone up on the math and algebras then test into the undergrad courses, skipping the "bridging" courses at the University. If the bridging courses are really $495, that should save you a 1k or so...

  12. I need more information! by dmarien · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I could probably steal my daughters..."

    To answer your question I need to know more about this... what grade is she in? How old is she?

    Brunette, red head, blonde? Please, I would love to help you but you're not giving me much to go on...

    --
    dmarien
  13. The Man Who Counted by Bloody+Bastard · · Score: 0

    The Man Who Counter is a very good book to read and full of Mathematics. It is a good start if you're trying to think Mathematics, not just applying formulae.

    I'm sure you'll enjoy it.

  14. Where are you going with it? by MattC413 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What are you planning to do with this education in Mathematics?

    Do you want this for information's sake, or do you want to plan a career out of it?

    These questions are important because if you are doing it for education's sake, the first time you look into a college-level Multivariable Calculus book might result in a little voice giving you a sudden desperate need to close the book and never open it again.

    Course, if you plan to make a career out of it, the above situation will probably still occur, but you'll at least have a strong reason to ignore that little voice and give it a serious try.

    -Matt

    1. Re:Where are you going with it? by kmellis · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "Do you want this for information's sake, or do you want to plan a career out of it?"

      Yes, I second the importance of asking yourself this question.

      I have an intensive classic liberal arts education. Calculus directly from Newton and Leibniz, for example. This is great for understanding what the calculus really is, but very poor for doing the kind of calculus that people do as a practical matter.

      The thing to understand in science and, yes, even math today, is that these have become almost completely technical fields -- that is "technical" in the sense of "technique". To be functional at all working in any of these fields requires the acquisition of a great amount of particular knowledge and technique that is not at all about a deep comprehension of the subject matter in general. A lot of my fellow alums find this out the hard way if they continue on to graduate school in a science, even though they tend to be accepted to the best schools. They have a lot of catch-up to do about the nitty-gritty stuff. On the other hand, their deeper comprehension serves them well as students and working scientists not infrequently.

      The point is that if you want to just really get into math because you want to know more about it, then you should not try to duplicate what someone does who is studying it for professional purposes. You should approach it from another angle; then, if you choose, supplement your general knowledge by beginning to acquire proficiency in the specific. You'll also have a better idea of what interests you before you go the distance by learning much of the minutae necessary to even have a decent comprehension of actual contemporay work done in these fields.

      The people doing this stuff for a living (or are students until they discover that they can't find a job and do this stuff for a living) will snobbishly dismiss a liberal arts approach to these subjects as being a waste of time or as some sort of pretense of learning that's not really there. Ignore them. They can't see the forest for the trees, and they shouldn't. That's not their job. For you, it's probably more fun to first examine and think about the forest before you start getting intimate with the trees.

    2. Re:Where are you going with it? by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder if you have education versus career reversed?

      I mean, I can think of very few professional degree programs that even get into multivar calculus. At my university, that's quite an optional endeavor for anyone but math majors!

      Lots of science majors take calculus, but it's brief calculus.

      Now, I'm in something like the same boat as the original poster. I was good with language, never with math. I failed every math endeavor I attempted, scraping through college on a liberal arts degree by barely passing the algebra requirement. That was then. At the age of 35, I discovered a new interest in learning math for its own sake, and am now doing a part-time program at a university majoring in math!

      If I had to do this for "career" reasons, I'd not be able to. It's only because it's education for its own sake that I can even face it. I'm hoping to retire as a math professor someday. I don't want to teach NOW, but as a gray, when the business world doesn't suit me anymore, hopefully I can still work as an educator!

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:Where are you going with it? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, God forbid anyone should get an education and expect to actually use it in life. An education should be an expensive white elephant, unusable except for Sunday afternoon jaunts to the art house, rather like a 60s British sports car.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Where are you going with it? by kmellis · · Score: 3, Informative
      I use my education everyday. What you are talking about is a vocational education. You know, like shop class.

      Yeah, "a lot" is two words. I conflate them to one quite often, since I think of it as a single word. I'm not the only one. It'll probably eventually appear in the OED. I'm a language pragmatist, not a proscriptivist.

    5. Re:Where are you going with it? by coult · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no such thing as understanding mathematics without doing mathematics. You will never understand mathematics without knowing how to do mathematics, that is without knowing the tricks and techniques and methods for solving problems. Likewise, you cannot be functional without comprehension of the concepts, otherwise you hit a brick wall the second you try to do something different than what was assigned for your homework. I say this based on my own experience as a professional research mathematician, scientific consultant, and professor of mathematics at a small liberal arts college.

      --

      All is Number -Pythagoras.

    6. Re:Where are you going with it? by Jerf · · Score: 2

      Parent is very good.

      It depends on what you mean by "interested in math". If you mean, like what your daughter is doing, then by all means, take a course from your local community college. You'll get the basics, with an emphasis on doing problems and getting the right result in the end.

      If you're interested in math as in what a mathematician does (hint: real mathematicians don't use calculators, they use pencil, paper, programs like Mathematica, and direct programming sometimes), then you're going to want a continuing education plan from a university. In other words, if you're looking at taking courses eventually that don't even exist at your community college, then don't start there.

      With no offense intended to anybody, everybody going "Hey, yeah, community colleges are better then universities!", the reason they are saying this is the focus is different. If you just want to progress to basic calculus and stats, then a community college's emphasis on results is fine. If you intend to go farther, you'll find yourself regretting not taking the U courses.

      Also, courtesy of those people, most U courses at the calc level have had most vestiges of math removed, so there may not be much difference between U and community college before calc 3, except price.

      I think the litmus test is to ask yourself, "What is math about?" If you answered "numbers", a community college will be fine. If you answered "the study of various axioms and their consequences" or something similar, go university.

      (Note to those who would flame this message: It doesn't matter what math is or what math is "better". The question is, what does the original poster think he's asking for?)

    7. Re:Where are you going with it? by ChiPHeaD23 · · Score: 1

      You could of thought this one more thought. Actually, you should of.

      There, now I've driven him insane.

    8. Re:Where are you going with it? by kmellis · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I am not saying that you can learn math without doing it. My liberal arts education specifically doesn't subsitute reading about something with actually learning and doing it.

      But the math you should do is dependent upon what you want to do with it later. To take a trivial example supporting my point, I was really pissed off at the education I'd gotten previously when I worked my way through Book I of Euclid's Elements and came to the Pythogorean Theorem. Suddenly, I understood it in a much deeper way. Did it matter that much in regards to that algebra I had done earlier in high school? Nope, not really.

      Or take irrational numbers. They are presented to students in the most prosaic fashion, and many students (not math majors or mathematicians, of course -- remember, I'm using rudimentary examples) would simply say "uh, they're numbers whose decimals go on forever? Oh, wait, they're numbers whose decimals go on forever without anything repeating?" That's literally true, and means nothing. When you stumble upon the incommensurability of the diagonal of a square to its side in the context of Euclidean geometry, such a thing is dumbfoundingly counter-intuitive.

      This type of thing repeats itself as you work your way deeper into any discipline. The top people tend to better acquaint themselves with deep, fundamental ideas as necessary. It's hard to do truly original work without doing so. But today's scientists are not trained, really, for doing truly original work, and they shouldn't be. Those that want to and have the aptitude will achieve that deeper level of comprehension on their own. Everyone else will do their much more technical, incremental work. And that is, in fact, the overwhelming majority of the progress made in science and mathematics. The big stuff gets all the glory, but its the little stuff that accounts for most of the work and enables the big stuff to be discovered. This is why although I greatly personally prefer deep comprehension over facility with technique, I don't advocate that this is the proper pedagogical approach for all students.

      The poster that asked the question needs to ask what he's looking for in his approach to mathematics. You know as well as I do that introductory calculus texts are more an attempt to manage to acquaint the student with calculus and then teach a variety of techniques that are likely to be of use in particular fields. If you're not working in those fields, if you're never going to use calculus either for technical purposes or as a working mathematician, you probably don't need most of those techniques. Much of this comes and goes as different technical approaches are fashionable. It just simply isn't the case that all the techniques that a student is taught in college calculus courses are essential to their understanding of the subject matter. That can't be true, as which techniques are taught change over time.

      Obviously, there's a core facility with both concepts and technique that is necessary for any resonable level of comprehension. I was not disputing that. That's why, in fact, I went to a liberal arts college very unlike yours (which is every one other than mine), where actually doing the mathematical work, of say, Lobechevsky, is considered essential and where a gloss in a math survey course is rightly considered for the most part a waste of the liberal art student's time. You're right: you don't learn a subject like math by reading about it.

    9. Re:Where are you going with it? by daghlian · · Score: 1

      Physicists do so much deep calculus that they forget that it's calculus much of the time and call it "algebra." Unfortunately, most physics also requires a deep understanding of what the math is actually doing. Most physics majors could leave their programs for the math department halfway through their junior year and still graduate on time.

      --

      One of these days/I'm going to cut you into little pieces.

    10. Re:Where are you going with it? by devnullforU · · Score: 1

      Often we forget how important mathematics can be applied in real life. Have you ever stood at a crossing in a city and when all the lights were red and crossed diagonally instead of going , say straight first , and then right. This saves 2 - sqrt(2) units of walking. Well almost that. [ I will leave to you to figure out how], Or using Euler's theorem to find the path you can take to go to multiple locations without traversing any path over and over. Check out google for this. Anyway, my point being that regardless of the fact that you need to make a career of this , mathematics does come in handy. And no - I am not a mathematician.

    11. Re:Where are you going with it? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I find it to be really odd to see such closed-mindedness and outright bigotry from such an "educated" person. Open your mind, and see things differently.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re:Where are you going with it? by cpparm · · Score: 1

      You have an intersting point. Richard Feynman said something like that too. However, my experience is you can't really enjoy math unless you get down to the details and acutally learn and use those techniques. Otherwise, it will just wash over you.

    13. Re:Where are you going with it? by belloc · · Score: 1

      Apropos of this thread, read my post below (#3810243). I made the mistake of posting it in direct response to the original story, and I'm afraid it has gotten rather buried.

      Belloc

      --
      I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
    14. Re:Where are you going with it? by kmellis · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I think you're a little confused. You were the one who insulted my education. My education is useful, so is yours. For different things. I'm not saying one is better than the other. Yeah, I responded with something that has an insulting subtext, but that was only to counter yours. Again, I don't think my type of education is for everyone, nor do I think yours is, either. But it is absolutely wrong to think of eduation as being only vocationally oriented -- which is what you implied with your post.

      In truth, almost all American higher eduation is now vocational education. Your attitude and comment demonstrate this. It's the only thing most people can imagine that an education could be for.

      The problem is that since what they want is a vocational education, and what the economy needs is a vocational education, it's interesting that we're not doing a very good job providing one. This is because of the supposed continued commitment to a "liberal education" by most American undergraduate schools. The result is the worst of both worlds: watered down liberal arts classes that teach little and make the students resentful that they are required to take them; and too few vocationally relevant classes, often with a poor degree of contemporary technical relevancy. This is why there's been a junior/community college revolution going on in this country for about twenty years -- they're meeting the demand that the universities aren't.

      Obviously, since I went to an extreme liberal arts school I believe in the ideal of a liberal education. But as a practical matter, vocational education is essential. Ideally, it'd probably make me happy if everyone did what I did, and then do a year or so of undergraduate preparatory work in a particular field, then continue on to a graduate school in that field. For the people that wouldn't have gotten an advanced degree, or don't want that much schooling, you could still do what I did but put vocational schooling and experience beginning in parallel like they do in Europe. But I don't really expect everyone to do what I did, and I'm certain it's not appropriate for everyone. What degree of a sort of liberal education is for "everyone"? Well, we started down this road before and where we're arrived is not satisfactory. I think I'd prefer to find a way to get as much as possible of this done in primary and secondary school, extending schooling to year-around and adding another year; then sending people on to vocational, liberal, or professional educations.

      It's actually a pretty modern thing to think of "education" as being a vocational education. What you needed to know to work in a vocation, you learned in apprenticeship or some other such institution. America has a particular problem with all this, though, since we have a very egalitarian ideal that wants to give all citizens some sort of a liberal education, while our relentless practicality also demands that we teach people to do their jobs. The two things are in many ways disharmonious.

    15. Re:Where are you going with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this post is exactly what the original "ask slashdot" question was looking for. Can you elaborate a bit? What would you consider the "canon" of math to be? I am a professional engineer, with a minor in math from a good school, and would personally LOVE to study math (and as an extension, advanced physics) in my spare time. However, in reading the technical journals I am constantly bombarded by symbols and notations which I simply don't recognize, and have no idea where to look to find the "rosetta stone", so to speak.

      In my work as a structural engineer I rarely use anything more intellectually challenging than basic multiplication. Occasionally I see formulas that take a form that I recognize as a solution to a differential equation from the higher calculus courses that I took and braindumped; I would have no idea where to even begin deriving them anymore. I'd like to be able to start with a blank sheet of paper and develop any theory I would ever need from scratch.

    16. Re:Where are you going with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could switch from physics to math halfway through their junior year and graduate on time with an applied math degree. Most physics majors tend to get rather annoyed and frustrated by the pure math courses.

    17. Re:Where are you going with it? by EugeneK · · Score: 0

      this is a good answer from Belloc...
      -Euclid, Appolonius, Descartes..I like the Dover Editions the best...

    18. Re:Where are you going with it? by kmellis · · Score: 2
      "What would you consider the "canon" of math to be?" Well, with a minor in math you probably already have experience with most of the math dealt with by the authors of original texts I would recommend to you -- that's what "canon" would mean to me. So if you want something completely new, those probably wouldn't fit the bill.

      On the other hand, working through those texts might give you much deeper insight into the math you already know. Is that what you want? Or do you just want to go further with what you know or to fill in the gaps? Again, do you want to do this for the pure intellectual satisfaction of comprehending something in general, or do you want to do specific stuff with what you learn?

      For the life of me, I can't remember which one, but it was one of the preeminent mathematicians (but it could have been a physicist) of the last few generations, I think, that said he wanted to spend his twilight years in deep study of Newton's Principia Mathematica (obviously read at my school, re: calculus) Clearly, he thought there was something of value there to learn.

      One thing about math is that some subfields can be pretty independent of all the others. I think you could start with basic set theory and go a long way without needing to (deeply) refer to other stuff. I keep wondering if I want to try to teach myself differential geometry (modern). That's because I want to understand general relativity, really. (You may notice that I agreed with the comment above that you can't understand many mathematical or physical ideas without doing the math.) I am not in a position to really evaluate how feasible this is. Yet.

      You could probably find some good stuff on Amazon. Look for real mathematicians trying to write about a specific subfield in a more generalized manner. (I don't ever read popularizations of science or math by people who are not scientists or mathematicians. I think it's good advice.)

    19. Re:Where are you going with it? by belloc · · Score: 1

      Obviously, since I went to an extreme liberal arts school...

      So, where did you go to school?

      Belloc

      --
      I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
    20. Re:Where are you going with it? by Hideyoshi · · Score: 1

      I actually studies mathematics at a liberal arts college (an Ivy League school I'd rather not mention here) and so I can say with some assurance that when you talk about mere "technique," you are talking sheer nonsense.

      The fact of the matter is that in fields like mathematics and theoretical physics one cannot claim to have really understood the material at a "deep" level until one has acquired a technical facility in handling the material.

    21. Re:Where are you going with it? by kmellis · · Score: 2

      St. John's College of both Annapolis and Santa Fe. There's a required math class six of the eight semesters. Here's a general page for the reading list, unfortunately they don't provide a reading list of what appears in the math "tutorial".

    22. Re:Where are you going with it? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      There is no such thing as understanding mathematics without doing mathematics

      Not entirely true. I can explain calculus to an algebra student very easily:

      "You know how you can use algebra to find the slope of a straight line? Calculus lets you find the slope of a curved line. It also lets you find the area under the line."

    23. Re:Where are you going with it? by Internet+Ninja · · Score: 1
      What are you planning to do with this education in Mathematics?

      A multitude of reasons really. Partly for pleasure, partly for the fun lf learning, partly for work and partly for my growing interest in Astronomy. I do backends for web sites - not much call for maths in there. But I thought a great way to learn some astronomy theory would be to program up some utility functions based on people like Meeus. It's a fair bit to bite off and it made me aware of how little I actually knew.

    24. Re:Where are you going with it? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Troll
      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

      You didn't even look at my URL, did you? Educated, my ass.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    25. Re:Where are you going with it? by ctimes2 · · Score: 1

      That must be why I washed out...

      --
      My cube. My friend. My solace. My prison.
    26. Re:Where are you going with it? by kmellis · · Score: 2
      Well, the "technique" you are learning is not necessarily the technique that a similar student at your school learned twenty years ago. Strangely, they were nevertheless able to understand mathematics.

      The Ivy League schools are not exactly the same with regards to the approach to these matters of pedagogy. That's why, in fact, you are referring to your school as a "liberal arts" school, and you are not attending MIT. Yours may be a steller mathematics department. Certainly MIT's is. I doubt that they take the exact same approach to the subject, nor do they teach all the same "techniques".

      Generally, the better the school, the more it will require that you learn deep concepts along with technique. But all scientific fields and mathematics, too, have become fragmented and specialized enough, that there simply isn't time to provide both deep comprehension and sufficient practical preperation and skill. This is just simply true, and I can't imagine that you would claim otherwise.

      I suspect that you are reflexively responding to what you figured I said, rather than what I actually said. You'll notice that I never claimed that you could learn mathematics without doing mathematics, and it's also obvious that doing mathematics requires technical expertise. The question is what is useful for deep comprehension, and what is useful for the ability to accomplish another purpose? I imagine that a mathematics education today is still pretty deep in terms of general comprehension. Theoretical physics, as well. It's interesting that you chose that example, as most physicists are not theoreticians. My experience among grad students in the sciences, mostly physics, is that their comprehension of fundamentals is sometimes frighteningly uneven.

      Another problem is that highly trained people like yourself (or who you will be) like to think that the only significant comprehension possible of their specialty is via their specific training. This is self-serving, and a simple function of human tendency toward chauvinism.

      I am not in any way endorsing autodidactical cranks. (I am neutral with regards to autodidacticism. I just don't want to give those "I have a better theory that General Relativity!" nuts any encouragement.)

    27. Re:Where are you going with it? by kmellis · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I was trolling with the experts on afu as long ago as 1994. I don't care about your trolling. Perhaps I meta-trolled you?

    28. Re:Where are you going with it? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Let me repeat:

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

      Which one of us wrote the three-page reasoned response, and which one of us took five seconds of thought to run off three lines?

      The first stage of troll recovery is admitting you've been trolled. It's OK, I understand. I can put you in contact with our support representatives.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    29. Re:Where are you going with it? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 0

      Dude, the Troll doesnt say that. You can't declare victory in your OWN fight.

    30. Re:Where are you going with it? by mandolin · · Score: 2
      I have an intensive classic liberal arts education. Calculus directly from Newton and Leibniz, for example.

      Whoah, dude! You must be a pretty old codger. Did you ever tell Newton "hey teach, could ya kinda lighten up on my other mentor? That dy/dx shit he teaches is cool."

    31. Re:Where are you going with it? by jnana · · Score: 2
      that is brilliant! How I wish somebody would have explained that to me before I laboured through calculus.

      You know how an apple falls when you drop it? Calculus lets you find the velocity with which it hits the floor; it also lets you know how much water you could store in the ball.

      Newsflash: I can teach calculus to 4-year olds in less than three minutes.

      Why do I have the sneaking suspicion that I have been trolled?

    32. Re:Where are you going with it? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 4, Informative

      May I recomend Dover Publications?
      They republish paperback versions of classics (Newton, Einstein, Fermi, etc...), as well as titles such as Problem Solving Through Recreational Mathematics , and 100 Great Problems of Elementary Mathematics. The beauty of Dover is their price. Many books are under $10.

      Also recommended for self study are the Schaum's Outlines series from McGraw-Hill.

    33. Re:Where are you going with it? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

      One can present many aspects of mathematics visually, so that a student could (literally) see the concept and understand the vocabulary without gaining any ability to calculate. One could likewise learn to differentiate and become proficent at speedily arriving at correct answers without ever even knowing they were solutions to any problem related to slope. This alone is not understanding. I would suggest that both modes relate to "understanding" mathematics. I've seen math presented with rigour where geometric interpretations were disdained. I've seen physics students who've learned a "bagfull of tricks" to put in their "toolbox", who learn to calculate fast and consistently, but can't discuss what it is they are doing. It works, its a valid step, it gets the right answer. Techniques and comprehension are both necessary, but they aren't the same thing.

    34. Re:Where are you going with it? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

      Math, Physics, and Chemistry require (at least) 3 semesters of Calc. Every chemist I know took Diff. Eq. too. At my school we even require 2 semesters of calc. for our Construction Technology students.

    35. Re:Where are you going with it? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      You weren't trolled, but you do seem to have missed my point. I wanted to take issue with the idea that you must DO mathematics in order to UNDERSTAND mathematics. I specifically chose an algebra student as my hypothetical audience. This student can't do calculus, but she can certainly understand what it is and what it does. I doubt a four-year-old would have the requisite understanding of slope and area to grasp what calculus is about.

    36. Re:Where are you going with it? by jnana · · Score: 2
      And I guess my point -- perhaps lost in the sarcasm -- was that the student does not really understand what calculus is. Saying that the music of Bach is like four people singing "michael, row the boat" doesn't convey anything meaningful about Bach's music. And I would argue that the same is true of your hypothetical algebra student. They don't have a clue what calculus is, though they may be able to repeat your words to you and may understand (sort of) the concepts of slope and area.

      And as for the four-year old, I think I could convey to the kid what slope is vaguely about (in the sense that you conveyed something to the algebra student) by showing her how her velocity changes as a function of the slope of a big slide, and how the area of a thin metal disc is how many M & M's it can hold. Voila. Now, she knows slope and area, and I can teach her calculus if you can teach the algebra student.

    37. Re:Where are you going with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the anti-troll. I don't adhere to established norms of slashdot troll behavior. I just like poking holes in stuffed shirts. -D

    38. Re:Where are you going with it? by Pig+Bodine · · Score: 1
      I have an intensive classic liberal arts education. Calculus directly from Newton and Leibniz, for example. This is great for understanding what the calculus really is, but very poor for doing the kind of calculus that people do as a practical matter.

      It's also not a very good basis for understanding the theory behind calculus. The theoretical background for calculus came much later than Newton or Leibniz: think instead of Cauchy and Riemann. If you've studied only Newton and Leibniz, you've studied a small part of the history and origin of calculus---not its theory, not its practical use and not even its full history.

      The concept of a limit was fuzzy at best and Leibniz worked with infinimetesimals. They didn't really understand "what the calculs really is." This was something that took a couple of centuries to figure out. The idea that these later technical refinements are not relevant to "a deep comprehension of the subject matter in general" is nonsense IMO.

      Which is not to say that the larger point of studying generalities first is bad. But ultimately math is about details. Dismissing these details as being irrelevant to a deep understanding is misleading.

    39. Re:Where are you going with it? by kmellis · · Score: 2
      It's also not a very good basis for understanding the theory behind calculus. The theoretical background for calculus came much later than Newton or Leibniz: think instead of Cauchy and Riemann. If you've studied only Newton and Leibniz, you've studied a small part of the history and origin of calculus---not its theory, not its practical use and not even its full history. The concept of a limit was fuzzy at best and Leibniz worked with infinimetesimals. They didn't really understand "what the calculs really is." This was something that took a couple of centuries to figure out. The idea that these later technical refinements are not relevant to "a deep comprehension of the subject matter in general" is nonsense IMO. Which is not to say that the larger point of studying generalities first is bad. But ultimately math is about details. Dismissing these details as being irrelevant to a deep understanding is misleading.

      I don't recall saying not to read later writers like Riemann, Cauchy, or Weierstrass.

      You are giving short shrift to Newton and Leibniz. The "incorrect" or "incomplete" ideas of the past are what informed the "correct" and "complete" ideas of the present. My personal experience has been that I always have a deeper, greater comprehension of the subject matter when approached in this manner; and the contemporary pedagogical method of a sort of "revelatory vision of the complete truth" is both false and misleading. There is more symmetry to mathematical and scientific discoveries in terms of precedence than you think -- they inform each other. If you only have the conventional revelatory, hubristic education, you'll think you know a subject better than you really do. As I said elsewhere, there's a reason that the very very best people go back and reexamine foundational and historical ideas, doing so relieves the myopia of the present.

      I have said repeatedly that a historical or general approach to studying mathematics is not the equivalent of the type of study you and others prefer. I have repeatedly warned that this should be taken into account. I have never said that this more generalized comprehension is "better", I've said several times that the ideal is both. What you and others are reflexively attempting to say to me in reponse is that your method of study of mathematics is the only valid method, and the approach I am recommending is clearly inferior to yours. Given that I am not making an apparently chauvinistic argument about my own preference, and you are, I suspect that the bias lies with you.

      Yes, you and others bristle at the connotations of my phrase "deeper comprehension", and I understand why you do. But you do so because you equate "deeper comprehension" with "greater comprehension", which is incorrect. I didn't mean it that way. Math, and science, is in the details, and a facility with those details is essential. But so is conceptual comprehension. No one can productively study these subjects without including both. Ideally, the study of both would be exhaustive. In practice, this is never true, and nowadays could never be true. Given limited resources, adjusting the relative mix of the two allows for adjusting for a desired outcome.

    40. Re:Where are you going with it? by johnjay · · Score: 1

      I don't recommend Dover Publications for math and science texts. Their primary advantage is that they have a large catalogue of books which are still excellent but are very cheap and hard to find under any other publisher. This is because they use texts in the public domain.

      However, Dover doesn't spend any significant energy on error checking (there is no economic advantage to coming out with a 2nd edition of a public-domain text), so their texts can have significant errors in the logic of their proofs and in their diagrams. This can be a real problem if you are engaged in self-study, because you don't have a professor with you who can point out the flaws.

      Any of the big-name authors, like the three mentioned above, are published by University presses and with more reliable editing and better diagrams. I don't know about obscure works, but I would suspect that there's a publisher out there who specializes in high-level Math texts and can give you a better version of most of the Dover catalogue.

      The price will be significantly higher because the books will be from limited printings, but if you are following a course of self-study buying cheap-but-flawed texts is false economy. (If you are taking a course on Einstein at the local university and need a copy of The Principles of Relativity, the Dover edition could be a good choice)

    41. Re:Where are you going with it? by ftns00 · · Score: 1

      So how do you explain the Fourier Transform, Laplace Transform, solution to the wave equation, etc etc etc?

      It's not all so basic....

    42. Re:Where are you going with it? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Kinda going off-topic at this point, but I found the most amazing book about a few years ago. There is a school that teaches languages to people by making them learn them all at once. They learn the vocabulary and grammar, and the written and spoken aspects of 8-12 different languages simultaneously. At some point, they decided that mathematics was a language and decided to apply their techniques for learning languagesto learning about mathematics. They wrote a book that starts with a fairly basic understanding of mathematics and takes the reader through a pretty decent (though not entirely rigorious) development of Fourier series. Arithmetic -> Fourier with a few stops in between, targetted at the intelligent non-math major. It was at my local library and I've forgotten the title, author, etc. Email me if you're interested and I'll try to find it again.

      Anyway, in response to your question...I'm not sure you can explain these to an algebra student. You could probably explain them to a first semester calc student, though. (Don't know, never tried...)

    43. Re:Where are you going with it? by Pig+Bodine · · Score: 1
      I don't recall saying not to read later writers like Riemann, Cauchy, or Weierstrass.

      Perhaps not, but you said that Newton and Leibniz were great for "understanding what calculus really is", but very poor for practical calculus. Considering that from Newton and Leibniz up to the 19th century calculus had very little theoretical basis and was in large part a method of formal manipulation (with many practical applications in physics), it seems to me that you have things backward. You did not say Newton, Leibniz, Cauchy, Riemann and Weirstrass are good for understanding what calculus really is. I would have agreed with that statement.

      You are giving short shrift to Newton and Leibniz. The "incorrect" or "incomplete" ideas of the past are what informed the "correct" and "complete" ideas of the present.

      And you are giving short shrift to Bishop Berkeley and his "ghosts of departed quantities". Newton and Leibniz did not have a rigorous basis for the calculus. I'm not saying they were anything other than amazingly original geniuses. However we've built on their ideas, extending and strengthening them. Ideas advance and this can't be ignored.

      What you and others are reflexively attempting to say to me in reponse is that your method of study of mathematics is the only valid method, and the approach I am recommending is clearly inferior to yours. Given that I am not making an apparently chauvinistic argument about my own preference, and you are, I suspect that the bias lies with you.

      I'm not sure how you make the determination of what constitutes a chauvanistic argument. I took your implication that Newton and Leibniz were sufficient without Cauchy, etc. to be a chauvanistic dismissal of the importance of studying later work. It looks to me like you have done nothing more than assert that my position is chauvanistic without any basis.

      In any event, I am no longer sure what you mean by a "historical" and "general" approach. I'm certainly not going to argue against the need for comprehension or intuition. However I should point out that conceptual intuition is not sufficient by itself for doing mathematics. As a researcher I've seen too many conceptual ideas for a proof vanish when confronted with details. If the point of studying mathematics is not to do mathematics or to use mathematics in practice, then I'm not sure what it is. Since your approach seems to be dismissive of practical applications and hostile to the idea that mathematics should always be taught at a level of detail sufficient for research, perhaps you could expound on the use of learning mathematics your way?

      I won't say much about the other stuff conerning "revelatory visions". I have never supported such a view and I would have thought my call for detailed study would in fact suggest that I hold the opposite view. IMO understanding is hard won. It also seems to me that the highly formal approach commonly used to teach math is contrary to this "revelatory" approach that you claim is in conflict with your "conceptual" but surprisingly not "revelatory" approach.

    44. Re:Where are you going with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this opinion; when I was taking the Mathods of Mathematical Physics course at our university, I was having serious difficulty with the lack of detail on certain issues in the course book --not using Courant as you can see.-- I came across a Dover publication in the library and immediately ordered 4 in related fields: 40 bucks -> A & a very thorough understanding at the current level.

      But I'm not too sure if most of the books that I bought will be even relavent if I do serious research in applied mathematics.

      Another thing to note is Dover actually publishes some of the Russian "classics." These books are magnificient.

  15. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Damn, I messed up the link. That should have been this one instead. Sorry!

  16. Re-learning by Sefi915 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Stealing your daughters' textbooks is almost what you want to do. Sit down with (one of) them and ask them what they're doing. Ask them to teach you. It'll be a wonderful learning experience for both you and your daughter(s).

    Personally, I was in a similar bind a few months ago. A co-worker was going to school for CIS and I read over his shoulder while he did his homework. More came back to me in those few months while watching him work and helping each other out than if I'd read the book by myself.

    Learning works better with two people.

    1. Re:Re-learning by Target+Drone · · Score: 3, Funny
      A co-worker was going to school for CIS and I read over his shoulder while he did his homework.

      Just make sure the person knows what they're doing. At university I saw someone take the fraction

      16
      ----
      64

      Cross out the sixes and end up with

      1
      ---
      4

      The scary thing is it actually worked!

    2. Re:Re-learning by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They must have known a trick.

      166
      ___

      664

      as well as

      16666
      _____

      66664

      work, as I would suspect any number of sixes on either end will.

    3. Re:Re-learning by coyote-san · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Assume x/y = 1/4, and x ends with 6 and y starts with 6 and ends with 4.

      Let x' = 10x + 6. This essentially adds a '6' to the end of the numerator.

      Let y' = 10y + 24. This essentially adds a '6' to the start of the denominator.

      Then x'/y' = (10x + 6) / (10y + 24) = (10x + 6) / (40x + 24) = 1/4 [(10x + 6)/(10x + 4)] = 1/4.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    4. Re:Re-learning by DeionXxX · · Score: 1

      What?? Maybe I'm missing something but you're completely wrong. Lets just go through some of the iterations of possible values for X and Y...

      x = 0, y = 0 ... x' / y' = 1/4 (check)

      x = 1, y = 0 ... x' / y' = 16 / 24 = 2 / 3 (wrong)

      x = 1, y = 1 ... x' / y' = 16 / 34 = 8 / 17 (wrong)

      And how did you get (10x+6)/(10x+4) == 1?

      I understand if you made a mental error.. but everything in that post makes no sense.

      -- D3X

    5. Re:Re-learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original post seems to be correct except

      1/4 [(10x + 6)/(10x + 4)]

      should be

      1/4 [(10x + 6)/(10x + 6)]

      Note that all of the "possible values" you listed for X and Y are not possible according to the assumptions made.

    6. Re:Re-learning by Clubber+Lang · · Score: 1

      work, as I would suspect any number of sixes on either end will

      I submit my counter-example...

      16/60 = 4/15

      not

      16/60 = 1/0

      --
      Actuaries - making accountants look interesting since 1949
    7. Re:Re-learning by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Uh, sorry, that doesn't disprove his example.

      The point being made was if you have

      x/y where X starts with 1 and has some 6's after it, and y has an equal number of 6's and a 4, it reduces down. how useful that is i'm not sure, but it works.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    8. Re:Re-learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      How about a more rigorous proof.

      Let x(n)=1 followed by n 6's.
      Let y(n)=n 6's followed by a 4.

      Theorem: x(n)/y(n)=1/4
      Proof: It's true for the n=0 case.
      The rest of the proof is by induction (what the original poster was thinking, but didn't really communicate well...)

      To prove this, we need to show that if x(n)/y(n)=1/4, then x(n+1)/y(n+1)=1/4.

      Note that x(n+1)=10*x(n)+6 (adding 6 to the end of the numerator). Further note that y(n+1)=10*y+24 (adding 6 to the beginning of the numerator. Then, x(n+1)/y(n+1) = (10*x(n)+6) / (10*y(n)+24).
      Since x(n)/y(n)=1/4, y(n)=4*x(n), so this is equal to (10*x(n)+6) / (10*4*x(n)+24)
      This is (10*x(n)+6) / (4*(10*x(n)+6)) = 1/4.

      The poster had the right idea, contrary to some of the responses, but didn't write a very rigorous proof.

    9. Re:Re-learning by Furry+Ice · · Score: 1

      Your test cases fail the assumptions:

      1. x/y must equal 1/4.
      2. x must end with a 6
      3. y must start with a 6 and end with a 4.

      The base case is thus y = 64 as anything smaller violates (3).

      Solving (1) gives an intial x of 16, which satisfies (2).

      Iterate from there.

    10. Re:Re-learning by crush · · Score: 2
      The last equation of your last line:

      1/4 [(10x + 6)/(10x + 4)] = 1/4.


      is incorrect. (10x+6)/(10x+4) != 1
    11. Re:Re-learning by WEFUNK · · Score: 2

      Great advice, but you should also consider doing it the other way around by proposing to formally tutor them. I say "formally" because you should set up some structure so it goes beyond Dad simply helping with their homework.

      Back in engineering, the best way I found to learn math was by preparing to teach something that was just beyond my present understanding. I've also had opportunities to do this at work and to stretch my abilities in an informal research setting (as the only non-PhD in a pretty technical area). You're really forced to know what you're talking about when you have to develop examples that clearly explain the concepts to others. And, as it will be your daughters, you have a real vested interest so you'll be especially concerned about not making an ass of yourself or misinforming them.

      Of course, with either approach (you propose that they teach to you or you propose that you tutor them) the learning will end up going both ways so it's really just in how you make the "pitch".

      Just another perspective to consider depending on how you think your daughter's might react to the otherwise excellent suggestion of teaching their Dad.

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    12. Re:Re-learning by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1
      Then there was the guy in a basic math class who came up with:
      64 4
      -- = - = 4
      16 1
      but when asked how he got the answer replied, "I cancelled the sixes."

      I wish I were just making this up.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    13. Re:Re-learning by TsEA · · Score: 1

      Anyway, as a simpler solution I could provide the following:

      the numerator is 6...6664 where we have x sixes can be written as:
      6*Sum(10^n) + 4 where n ranges from 1 to x
      equally we could write:
      60*Sum(10^n) + 4 where n now ranges from 0 to x-1

      We will call the last sum "A"
      as we know (simple math, geometric progression)
      A=(10^x-1)/(10-1)=(10^x-1)*9

      so, the numerator is: (20/3)*(10^x-1) + 4 =
      = (20/3)*10^x - (8/3) = 4*((5/3)*10^x-(2/3))
      The denominator now is:
      10^x + 6*Sum(10^n) where n ranges from 0 to x-1
      Using the same plain method, the denominator becomes:
      10^x + (2/3)*(10^x-1) = (5/3)*10^x-(2/3)
      so, as you see:
      nominator / denominator = 4

      Easy huh? (this is a simple solution which will probably clear some fuss)

      --
      ---- Fear the mighty TsEA
    14. Re:Re-learning by argor · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but out of that one typo (and he must mention that x begins with a '1') I do not think anything is wrong in that "original" proof.

      I even think that it can be made far more general than yours, it really implies that any two (real!!) numbers x,y where:

      x/y = 1/4 (Not only x=1,y=4!!)

      have the property that

      X'/Y' = 1/4 ,where X' = 10x+6 and Y' = 10y+24

      This is far more general and the original 166/664 thingy just falls out as a special case: (with, if you really want, a trivial induction) x=1, y=4 and noting what you noted ;-) (x(n+1)=..) One could proof that note, but that would be reeeal overkill.

      Jan

      P.S. One could generalize the proof a lot further though, but that would really just be for the fun of it.

    15. Re:Re-learning by coyote-san · · Score: 2

      It was a typo. I can divide 24 by 6, despite the evidence to the contrary.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    16. Re:Re-learning by coyote-san · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know how to write a formal proof by induction, but I didn't have the time to figure out the most general case and (wrongly) assumed everyone would recognize the back-of-the-envelope inductive proof.

      Exists x, y, n such that nx = y.

      Let x' = 10x + a, y' = 10y + b.

      Then...

      where this particular set is n = 4, a = 6, b = 4.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    17. Re:Re-learning by coyote-san · · Score: 2

      It was an informal inductive proof. Find any x, y such that x/y = 1/4 and you satisfy the other conditions listed. The proof says that x:6/6:y (where ':' indicates concatenation of the digits) is also equal to 4. It says nothing at all about whether any values of x, y exist that satisfy that relation, but in this case we already know about 16/64.

      (As I mentioned elsewhere, the '4' was a typo. I can divide 24 by 6...)

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    18. Re:Re-learning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh. That is easy to counter. Ask him to do this:

      65
      --
      26

      Tell him you only added one to each ;-)
      Damn.... it works. He is on a role now.

      Next, before he has time to think:

      67
      --
      46

      Tell him your speeding up and have added two to each, this time.
      When he gets 7/4, say to him that it looks approximately right ;-)
      When he gets excited, ask him to check it.

    19. Re:Re-learning by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it happenned in the late '70s (I got my M.Sc. in math from Ohio State in 1980). I still remember this since it was especially cute when we (several TAs) asked the guy about how he got the answer because he even crossed out the sixes. I don't remember now why we grilled him on it (suspected of cheating or just trying to see if he really knew what he was doing).

      Still, this makes a great example of how you can missapply a rule in a specific example and get the right answer. I'll have to remember the 65/26 since it seems to show that this technique really works. I'm amazed at how many times having an example like this has come in handy when I needed to disabuse someone of a similar mistake.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    20. Re:Re-learning by sfjohnson · · Score: 1

      I'd agree that learning works better with two people, and learning works best if you teach! Perhaps you could commit to teaching your daughters some math, and stay one section ahead of her while doing so.

      Some resources:

      * The Schaum's Outline series are cheap, and excellent, if a bit dry. Work every exercise, and you'll soon get up to speed.

      * Mary L. Boas' "Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences, 2nd ed." is great once you've completed the Schaum's Differential and Integral Calculus book. Lots of less abstract problems, and material that forms the mathematical foundation for engineering and physics.

      Good luck!

      --
      Live in the Future; It's Just Starting Now!
  17. Just read some books by BlueLines · · Score: 3, Informative

    i reccommend What Is Mathematics by Courant, Robbins, Stewart. This covers just about everything in modern math until the 1940's or so (and the newer version have updated sections on Fermat's last theorem). Plus there's a blurb from Albert Einstein praising the book on the back. You can't ask for much more than that.

    -BlueLines

    --
    --BlueLines "The cost of living hasn't affected it's popularity." -anonymous
    1. Re:Just read some books by raresilk · · Score: 2
      Speaking as someone whose math motivations and base level are about the same as the guy who started this thread -- I definitely would not start with "What is Mathematics."

      I bought it for the same reason, and I'm sure it's a great book, but I got about one chapter into it, and realized I did not have the fundamental knowledge layer that was necessary. It's not a question of raw intelligence - I can and do grasp most stuff just by looking at it. But trying to read and understand this book fully for someone like me whose formal math education is limited to Algebra and Plane Geometry, in high school 20 years ago, is a waste of time because I don't really speak the langauge yet.

      Two things that have worked for me fairly well, and would work better if I had more time to do them:
      1. Used math texts can be bought for 5 or 10 bucks on Ebay. I browse through them, working the problems or not at my pleasure; and
      2. The "prep" books that help people cram for exams - there are several series of these available.

      The biggest problem with my approach is that I don't know what I need to learn first, and in what sequence. Like: how much of trig should you grasp before trying calculus? What exactly are all those different algebras? What math would help me the most in task X, Y or Z? So I would love to do the community college thing too - I live near a good one and they have a ton of math classes from baby to very high level. But it's not feasible right now with job and family committments. I've been keeping an eye on that MIT Open Courseware project site, because I thought there might be syllabi, someday, that I could draw upon to guide my progress. But so far, just a promise of something in the future.

      --
      No, no, no. This is not a sig.
    2. Re:Just read some books by solferino · · Score: 2


      a book you might find interesting is called

      Vedic Mathematics or Sixteen Simple
      Mathematical Formulae from the Vedas

      amazon link here
      (link given for info not vendor suggestion)

      vedic mathematics teaches a system of sixteen simple sutras
      (or principles) which when applied to general arithmetic
      - addition, subtraction, multiplication, division
      (or th corresponding carrollian terms) -
      give a very elegant and powerful system of mental arithmetic

      th application of th sutras goes far beyond arithmetic however, and this book also shows how they can be used to derive elegant and powerful proofs in various fields of mathematics

      th system is very interesting and elegant,
      and gives you a fresh way to go over old
      (or new) ground if you are returning to mathematics

      there is a website here
      if you are interested in reading more
      about vedic mathematics

    3. Re:Just read some books by Wolfier · · Score: 3, Informative

      How To Solve It, by G Polya, is also a very good math book. It actually was more interesting to me than some other books with more symbols when I read it during high school.

      It proved to be so useful even after I've entered and graduated from university, and beyond.

    4. Re:Just read some books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A book I like is "The Nature and Growth of Modern Mathematics" by Edna E.Kramer. This book provides a broad sweep of both basic and advanced topics, up to the early 20th century. It is self-contained and very readable, with clear examples that show how important problems are solved, even for the advanced topics.

      I am not sure if it is in print. You might check amazon. I am sure used copies may be found.

    5. Re:Just read some books by raresilk · · Score: 2
      In researching the answer to my own questions, I ran across the following site which provides something like a taxonomy of mathematics:
      http://www.math.niu.edu/~rusin/known-math/index/to ur_div.html
      Perhaps someone else will find this helpful as well.

      --
      No, no, no. This is not a sig.
  18. Cliff's Quick Review Books by downtime · · Score: 0
    I've found them to be really handy for getting back up to speed. I have Algebra II and Geometry and i think there are ones for Trig and Calculus. I know these aren't very advanced topics, but when you're trying to get started again, you need to start with the little stuff.


    hope that helps.

  19. As Euclid said... by cperciva · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As Euclid said, "there is no royal road to mathematics". Go to university, take the courses they tell you to take, and expect to spend a lot of time and money.

    Either that, or don't bother. Quite seriously, I doubt you'll be able to learn much whatever you do -- mathematics is a subject which people find incredibly hard to pick up late in life.

    1. Re:As Euclid said... by downtime · · Score: 0
      yeah, but if you have enough desire, almost anything is possible.


      it appears you've had plenty of desire to be a dick...

    2. Re:As Euclid said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, it was, "There is no royal road to geometry."

      Dumbass.

    3. Re:As Euclid said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disagree. I didn't hit Partial Differential Equations and Linear Algebra until I was in my 30's, and was almost 40 when I took my coursework in vector and tensor analysis. Oddly I've found these courses useful from time to time.

    4. Re:As Euclid said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the Yellow Brick Road.

      Dipshit.

    5. Re:As Euclid said... by bishnu · · Score: 1
      Interestingly, the guy who posted this is a DPhil (yes, in math) student at Oxford University.

      He may know what he is talking about.

    6. Re:As Euclid said... by cperciva · · Score: 2

      Thus spake the AC: Actually, it was, "There is no royal road to geometry."

      That is the common translation, but you have to remember the context; in Euclid's time, "mathematics" and "geometry" meant the same thing.

      The situation is similar with "arts" and "sciences" -- until a few centuries ago, the two words were used interchangeably.

    7. Re:As Euclid said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To original poster - Don't listen to the naysayers around here. You *can* take the classes you want, work, and spend time with your family. The key is maintaining discipline and allocating your time wisely. I too am taking a basic calculus course at my community college, after a 10-year hiatus. The instructor makes all the difference in the world. Just give it your best shot, and remember, knowledge learned and applied leads to wisdom to be shared. So anything you learn will be helpful someday. I salute you!

    8. Re:As Euclid said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...for worthless pieces of garbage like yourself.

  20. Look at university web sites by Eminor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look at the syllabus for courses at your favorite university web site. From there you can look up topics on the web or in books.

  21. Tutor by ouslush · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why not just get a tutor? It would definitely be less expensive than actually going to school again. Also, you get the 1 on 1 atmosphere which is usually the best. I think anyone who actually 'wants' to take math is crazy, but whatever floats your boat

    1. Re:Tutor by mblase · · Score: 2

      Why not just get a tutor? It would definitely be less expensive than actually going to school again.

      With all due respect, a tutor (at least, a reputable one) is invariably the most expensive way to get up to speed on a given school subject. One-on-one is easier, more effective, and therefore correspondingly more expensive than one-on-a-couple-dozen (classroom), one-on-a-few-hundred (lecture), or one-on-a-few-thousand (textbook).

    2. Re:Tutor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all due respect, a tutor (at least, a reputable one) is invariably the most expensive way to get up to speed

      You didn't expect that the OP would have actually done the math, did you?

    3. Re:Tutor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way to learn maths, imho, is to study it with a pencil (with a big eraser), a really big pad of paper, and a good meaty book on the sub-subject that you are interested in. Teachers and Professors are great in facilitating concepts, but there is nothing like *knowing* how it works, and that comes from working at it. That means not just assigned problems in a book, but _all_ problems. You do those on your own accord, not because it is required. You will be surprised how it comes together nicely and you learn the twists and turns in the road with a little maths fun(until you hit Godel and he slams you down).

  22. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is actually quite an interesting site, thanks.

    Of course, a google search would reveal a lot more.

  23. For free... by lostchicken · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://mathworld.wolfram.com/

    This isn't completely what you want, but it is a very good reference site for mathematics, from the fine people who brought us Mathematica. And it's free, and as we all know, free is good.

    --
    -twb
    1. Re:For free... by urbman · · Score: 1

      The program mathematica is also quite good
      for "experimental" math...

      I was able to teach myself some fundamentals
      of signal processing this way...

    2. Re:For free... by ralmeida · · Score: 1

      And you also could use Maxima, which is GPLed.

      --
      This space left intentionally blank.
    3. Re:For free... by ilyag · · Score: 1

      Mathworld is good, but I found it very hard to learn something new with it - the articles usually assume that you know the stuff, and use them as a reference.

      Also, you can use http://mathworld.com as well.

    4. Re:For free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As we know from experience mathworld isn't free. (as in speech)

      Use http://planetmath.org/ instead comrade.

    5. Re:For free... by saforrest · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, It's nice that it's there, but to really learn math, you will need to take classes.
      Mathworld is good for quick-reference definitions and theorem statements, but it's tough to learn from it.

      If you're going to plug math content sites on Slashdot, though, you might as well plug PlanetMath, which in addition to being freely accessible, has all of its content published under the GNU Free Documentation License.

    6. Re:For free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mathworld is a tight sight, especially if you need to look up specific math terms and proceedures... but the site tends to use abstracts, which I think could make it hard for beginning math students to use.. don't get me wrong, mathworld is my favorite math site!

    7. Re:For free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats up tbarr! greets from chicago/denton/where-ever.

  24. suggestions by j1mmy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Anything past pythagoras is a little tough for me :) but I know I could get back up to speed quickly.

    That's where you're wrong :) Math will still be tough for you. Just don't try.

  25. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by peterpi · · Score: 1

    Yes, people used to do this when I was at university. Most lecturers really don't care (nor even notice) who turns up for lectures. That said, if you're looking to refresh high school level maths, then an undergraduate course might be a bit over your head. It would definately be beyond me, and I use high school level math most days at work.

  26. Online Resources? by Amoral+Psycho · · Score: 1

    If you use Google.com you may find great deal of web-sites with great deal of information, and also there are many great math ebooks available online. And the resource that I use for all of my questions is this little chat on IRC (DALnet #math) they help me with all the problems that I come across with.

  27. Online... by clinko · · Score: 2

    A lot of university professors post their tests or nots online.

    Try google...

    or go to the math dept.'s site and click on professors. You'll find something like this: LSU Prof's
    From there you can get their personal sites that have tons of information.

    This is how Passed Dif. Eq. Got most of the information from google and lots of different university's notes.

    1. Re:Online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a Math/CS major, passed diffy Q buy taking it the last semester of senior year and not taking the final, got my D and ran like he....

      Never had to do any calculus or above in the real world of coding. Lots of FORTRAN and Visual Basic though

  28. Whatever you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make sure it's not just by reading posts in Slashdot about the Riemann Zeta Function and associated hypotheses...

  29. One good book by photon317 · · Score: 2
    I'd recommend the following books, it was good for when I was in roughly the same position:

    Mathematics for the Million (ISBN 0-393-31071-X) Even Albert Einstein had good things to say of this book.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  30. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That didn't look like maths to me. Still, I would rate it +1 Interesting for the methodology and coding.

  31. It's called a library... by seigniory · · Score: 1

    they have books that you can borrow and read -- and guess what? It's all FREE FREE FREE!!! All the knowledge you gain is yours to keep!

    1. Re:It's called a library... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe. But I dare you to find a good book on advanced number theory or Fourier analysis at your local public library.

    2. Re:It's called a library... by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      But your local library can get those good books on advanced number theory or Fourier analysis via interlibrary loan. And it's still free.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    3. Re:It's called a library... by foonf · · Score: 2
      It's all FREE FREE FREE!!! All the knowledge you gain is yours to keep!


      That sounds suspicious...are you sure its not illegal?
      --

      "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
  32. Book + ICQ + IRC + Newsgroups + etc... by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    This is how I learn to program, and sprinkle in university courses as you have time / money. the internet is an awesome resource!

    I remember about 10-15 years ago when some company was saying they were bringing the "Information superhighway." I thought yea right, but after I started using it, I have to agree.

    People are always happy to share their knowledge for free even. Many are even school professors and book writers!

    1. Re:Book + ICQ + IRC + Newsgroups + etc... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Many are even school professors and book writers!

      You'd probably be surprised how many of those people are 14 year old girls in other rooms... ;-)

    2. Re:Book + ICQ + IRC + Newsgroups + etc... by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      People are always happy to share their knowledge...

      Or simply pool their ignorance.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  33. SOSmath.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Though I'm not in the same situation as you, SOSMath is a GREAT reference that I've used many times to "remember" things such as how to solve differential equations and matrix multiplication properties. good luck!

    1. Re:SOSmath.com by jandrese · · Score: 2

      While SOSmath is a nice reference for finding old formulas, it's really quite horrible for learning Math. It has the same problem 90% of Math textbooks have, when they introduce new topics they tend to just give it a name (like say Laplace Transform) and give you the formula (with plenty of implicitly defined single letter greek variables) and tell you to go with it. There is no discussion on what it is useful for, when you need to use it, or even what problem domain this solution exists in. Heck, I don't think SOSmath even tells you how to intrepret any of the arcane syntax common in any high level math.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  34. because mathematicians have a sense of humor too by Dunhausen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then there was the crackpot category theoretician
    who thought he was a catamorphism operation. He'd walk around the psych ward with a pair of bananas, which he'd hold up around the other patients and giggle maniacally.

    Once he did this to the resident hypochondriac (who was convinced he was in the final stages of inoperable brain cancer), but it didn't seem to bother him.

    "What are you doing?" he asked.

    "I'm constructing a unique arrow," said the crackpot, "with YOU as its target!"

    "So what's the big deal about that?" said the hypochondriac. "I'm terminal."

    (Of course, this joke is only funny if the mental hospital is Cartesian Closed...)

    --
    Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human. At best he is a tolerable subhuman who has learned to we
  35. The problem is time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hi, I'm 38. I have a similar situation. From my experience, there is only one thing stopping you - time.

    I am a family man (two kids) and trying to get anything done with a family to take care of too has been very tough for me. So, slowly I realize I will eventually end up as yet another mathematician-wannabe... |sigh|

    Recommendations? Get a family, skip the intellectual masturbation. When you're approaching forty years you will thank me. No algorithm beats a bed-time story.

    1. Re:The problem is time by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      Any redneck can be a successful family man. Not everyone can obtain a worthwhile classic liberal arts education. Calculus directly from Newton and Leibniz, for example.

      The people doing the family man stuff will snobbishly dismiss a liberal arts approach to education as being a waste of time or as some sort of pretense of learning that's not really there. Ignore them. Invest in knowledge, you'll thank me when the kids are grown and long-gone.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:The problem is time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why don't you get divorced and buck the kids onto the ex-wife? She is going
      to divorce you eventually anyway, why not beat her to the punch?

      I'm serious. Get a divorce. You won't regret it. No one else is going to look out for
      your best interets. And once you start tooling around the campus, there
      will be so many hot babes to zoom.

    3. Re:The problem is time by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Any redneck can be a successful family man.

      I suppose if your target for success is sufficiently low enough. Of course that means any redneck can also be a successful mathematician.

      The people doing the family man stuff will snobbishly dismiss a liberal arts approach to education as being a waste of time or as some sort of pretense of learning that's not really there. Ignore them. Invest in knowledge, you'll thank me when the kids are grown and long-gone.

      I think the poster was pointing out that you can't have two goals that consume the bulk of your time. One or the other has to give. Nothing wrong with a good education, but someone in his situation has to make a choice. Can you really ONLY get knowledge from a university? Does it matter to you how your kids turn out? What's important to you?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    4. Re:The problem is time by dprust · · Score: 1

      WTF; what is up with the nasty comments? Math geeks gettin' a little ornery in here. Place nice, kids.

    5. Re:The problem is time by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      It's your time, and you have to carefully make decisions on how it's spent. Would you rather spend time with kids who are going to hate you in a few short years as soon as they start participating in youth culture, or a real education, the kind you can use every day for the rest of your life? New parents are fooling themselves that their children will be as loving throughout their lives as they are when they were three.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:The problem is time by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Would you rather spend time with kids who are going to hate you in a few short years as soon as they start participating in youth culture, or a real education, the kind you can use every day for the rest of your life? New parents are fooling themselves that their children will be as loving throughout their lives as they are when they were three.

      Bitter are we? I opted to spend time with my kids and they turned out great. Maybe I should have stayed in school before starting a family and then I wouldn't have had to make that choice. My kids have rolled their eyes during discussions and have disagreed with me on some points (but not most). That's a far cry from 'hate'. I'd also like to challenge the idea that a three year old knows what love is (even most adults don't grasp that concept fully) much less express it. Affection is, indeed, fleeting and fickle and that is what most parents of young children confuse with love. That's also why some people are adamant about their pets loving them.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    7. Re:The problem is time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD This one up

    8. Re:The problem is time by tumbaumba · · Score: 1

      Any redneck can be a successful family man. Not everyone can obtain a worthwhile classic liberal arts education. Calculus directly from Newton and Leibniz, for example.

      Why do you want get 'Calculus directly from Newton and Leibniz'. Those guys are definitely founders of the subject but reading them is of mainly historical interest, let along the fact that they were wrong in great many things.

  36. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry, but I had grey hairs at 20.

  37. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thx! that science game is funky!

    i like the bit where the prof blows up if you get all the answers right hehe

  38. dont worry by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guarantee you will go back to hating math after taking a single class.

    But seriously university classes in math tend to be rather boring because they tend to reduce even complicated fields into a few formulas that can be memorized and a few problem types for which you can memorize which formula to use.

    Also they tend to assign a lot of dull homework.

    So classes seem to be geared towards those that cant understand math but are willing to tackle it with brute memorization.

    Or maybe i just went to a bad university.

    1. Re:dont worry by mitchkeller · · Score: 1

      I would have to say that you just went to a bad university. I'm an undergraduate at North Dakota State and am currently in the mathematics REU at Louisiana State, and I couldn't disagree with you more about reducing mathematics to rote memorization. I TA'ed a trigonometry class last fall, and our students were expected to understand how things worked and were given problems that required them to apply the trig they learned to a tangible problem. Yes, introductory mathematics courses do require a lot of "memorization," but that memorization should be accompanied by understanding. Sure it's one thing to know a theorem's statement, but to understand how to use it is another thing altogether.

      I'm not really sure if the person asking the question just wants a familiarity with mathematics through, say, calculus or if abstract mathematics is a desired area to learn. However, starting at a CC is probably adviseable to get through college algebra, trig, and calculus. After that, I'd suggest at least a couple courses from a university. An introduction to mathematical logic and proof (and set theory) is important for any further reading. Most universities have the so-called "bridge courses" and they vary in their worth. However, if you've been out of school for awhile, it would be worth it to find and take one. After that, I (being a dedicated discrete mathematician) would suggest an area of discrete math such as graph theory or combinatorics. (There are several good books out there, or you could find classes to take.) They're very approachable, even if they have too many definitions. After that, head onto some other math along the lines of abstract algebra and real analysis (this is where you really learn what calculus is all about).

      Mathematics is a fascinating subject with many diverse areas to explore. Check them out, find out what you like, and then pursue it. If you're not going for a degree, steer clear of areas that don't interest you, but don't hesitate to read a book or take an intro course in that area. You might be surprised that you like it.

      Mitch

      --

      "You will only be remembered for two things: the problems you solve or the ones you create." Mike Murdock

    2. Re:dont worry by _Chainsaw · · Score: 1
      This has been my experience with math courses for the most part. I never understood why they expect you to be able to regurgitate formulae when the whole point is to know when to use them, how to use them and understand how they work.

      Somewhere along the line the American education system concluded that math is _supposed_ to be hard and the easiest way to make it hard is to require people to memorize seemingly inane formulae and then require them to regurgitate them verbatim prior to applying them (test time).

      I have pissed off more than a few math teachers with a simple question: Is this a math class or a memorization class?

      I personally developed a real hatred of math due to this 'memorization requirement'.

    3. Re:dont worry by jjoyce · · Score: 1

      You must have gone to a bad university. None of my math classes ever had anything presented as a formula to use in some problem. We did nothing but proofs.

    4. Re:dont worry by Hideyoshi · · Score: 1

      Or maybe i just went to a bad university Hate to say, but you probably did ... rote memorization played absolutely no part in my mathematical education.

    5. Re:dont worry by ajmarks · · Score: 0

      I have to say that you either went to a horrible university, or you took engineering math courses. Engineering courses aren't really math courses, they're applying formulas classes. Real math classes require proofs, not lots of computation.

      --
      Opinions are not Informative, though they may be Insightful or Interesting.
    6. Re:dont worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is, if you really grok an equation (and this requires working out several exercise problems, there's no way around it), then you'll have no trouble remembering the equation.

  39. When in rome... by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

    Do what the students do, but on your own....Most tech related majors AT LEAST have to take a full year of calculus, which is usually 3 classes and typical they use the same book through all 3 of them, try getting a book from your nearest university (or even comm college) and check their Math department website, chances are the professor has posted homework assignments and you can start on those.......

  40. I'll help you start by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    the digits in the decimal system are 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
    Any number plus (+) 1 is the next number in the set
    when you get to 9, the number as a result of adding 1 is 10.

    1. Re:I'll help you start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The digits are '0'. The number after 0 is
      succ(0) where succ() returns the successor
      The number after succ(0) is succ(succ(0))

      Adding is just imbedding one number in another:

      succ(succ(succ(0))) + succ(0) =
      succ(succ(succ(succ(0))))

  41. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, excellent idea. Tons of people do this at my university to refresh for their professional tests. But god, please don't ask a crapload of questions....I hate that nothing more. Some guy who's not paying for the class and who's obviously jumped in over his head asks a bunch of questions and waste our time.

    I kid you not, EE351: "What's a transistor?" Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!!!!!!!!

  42. Homeschooling mathbooks, the best. by DancingSword · · Score: 1

    The Saxon Math Books

    http://www.saxonpublishers.com/sitemap/index.jsp

    Why are they the best?

    Instead of heaving a month-mosh worth of stuff at a student ( in order to make the student's process appear good on the committee-reports ), the John Saxon's Idea was to give us 1 simple concept at a time, so that we actually learn it, and to layer/syncopate the concepts so that progress is continuous.

    It works.

    --
    Messages to/for me ( in me journal )
  43. Laerning math by kichiguy · · Score: 1

    Try the math column in Scientific American. The stuff there is usually a little more fun than
    actual course work.

  44. sci.math & alt.math.undergrad by speby · · Score: 1

    I suggest you ask these questions here. Your questions is quite specific to generalize to the young, dumb slashdot crowd. Many of the posters in these aforementioned newsgroups are university professors who have either written or have contributed to mathematical writings, papers, periodicals, and articles. They will definitely be more useful than what you'll find here.
    Cheers

    1. Re:sci.math & alt.math.undergrad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember to ignore posts by Ludwig Plutonium.

    2. Re:sci.math & alt.math.undergrad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goodness! Ludwig Plutonium still trolls sci.math.* and sci.physics.*?

      I am going to have to fire up the old newsreader again tonight because I could use a little entertainment value.

      As an aside: does Alexander Abian still preach his "time and matter are equivalent" theme to sci.physics? I remember reading his posts when I was an undergrad and laughing for a long, long time. I heard he was on his last legs at Iowa State though.

    3. Re:sci.math & alt.math.undergrad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, he still seems to show up as "Archimedes Plutonium". Almost makes me want to start reading sci.math again.

      google groups search

  45. basics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I am ph.D student in Math. Most of the useful math that you are going to need is going to start with college algebra/trigonometry. Then Calculus/Statistics/Linear Algebra. The only way to learn these is to do problems. If you are disciplined enough to work them on your own, then that is the key. But then, who do you turn to. Perhaps you could hire a tutor when you need help? Other than this idea, you should have an instructor to assign problems to you and keep you working. The only way to learn math is by doing example problems. Good reference: MathWorld.com

    1. Re:basics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah. Who do you turn to?

      Read through a college-level math textbook authored by Apostol sometime. If you can work your way through that, you can work your way through anything and you can skip the tutors. :)

    2. Re:basics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then, who do you turn to

      You can always go the nearest university/college and find out when they hold math tutoring sessions. It won't cost you anything if they don't require you to show them a student ID (most don't).

  46. try these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i got a B.S. in math in 2000 from UCSD. here are some
    books i really enjoyed.

    _Symmetry_ by Herman Weyl
    _Geometry and the Imagination_ by David Hilbert
    _How to Solve_ it by George Polya (anything by Polya is excellent)

    These are classics written by famous mathematicians,
    but they are not very advanced. They quickly get to
    the "deep" and "beautiful" parts of their subjects.

    of course to go on in math you will need command of
    the important "every day" tools, esp. calculus and
    linear algebra.

    a good book for this is
    _mathematical thinking: problem solving and proofs_ by
    d'angelo and west. the first edition is better, if
    you can find it .

    -a

  47. Social Learning by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    Become friends with Math Professors or Math Teachers. or some other people who are good at math and talk about it a lot. When you hang around them for a while you pick stuff up. And espectly if they are a professor they will probly give you little helps and tips for free.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  48. Math Competition Problems by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have found that doing these USAMTS competition problems have pushed me forward a lot this past year of my high school career (not to mention an honorable mention finish). Try it and see what you learn. For those high schoolers out there, its a nice competition to get into, the only thing you pay is postage to send your answers in.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
  49. More stuff like this would be great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one is a java-based demo of a bunch of signals and systems engineering math operations, at Johns Hopkins University, and I wish more stuff like this could be available (especially from students working in specific areas) to help students of all ages grasp more complicated math. Or even simple math.

    However, I'd be happy if more adults knew that p=mv so they wouldn't be so inclined to cut off a bus in their tiny cars as they both approach a stop light...

  50. Dover books by gwayne · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe it's Dover anyways...they publish a really great series of math books on a variety of subjects, available at Barnes and Noble for $10-15. A real bargain if you ask me! I bought "Math for Nonmathematicians," for a refresher, but it is more of a history book--aninteresting read nonetheless. I haven't done high-level math in about 7-8 years either, so I broke out my old calculus books too. I enjoy studying number and graph theory, very useful for programmers.

    1. Re:Dover books by halv · · Score: 1

      Another Dover-like option:
      http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cdl-math-browse.htm l

  51. Pretend your in highschool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what I did, I just dressed up like a gangsta grabbed my nine and showed up for math class. The teacher eventually asked me who I was, so I just told her I was skipping school since the beggining of the year and this was the first day I showed up and I wanna learn some match bi***!

  52. ...another idea... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some colleges have courses on TV. In Portland, PCC (Portland Community College) they have 'telecourses' on Math. Unfortunately, I failed to keep up on the class. However, if I get renewed interest in taking the course I can fire up the PCC channel and watch it.

    I imagine this is available in SOME other areas too. It's worth a view and doesn't cost you anything.

    1. Re:...another idea... by fuerstma · · Score: 1

      Even if you don't live local, I know DISH Network carries a great number of Univ. of Washington Telecourses. I have watched their 'Intro to Programming' course several times... mostly for fun thus far, but I could use a brush up on my Polymorphism, etc... coming in later weeks.

      --
      www.jackasscritics.com
  53. Adult High School & Community College by BlueStreak · · Score: 1

    I just started a university degree and I have to take an extra math course. The profs at my university suggested taking the extra math I need (geometry & algebra) at a high school. I was going to but they couldn't find a teacher to teach it during the summer (hmm... wonder why?).

    Anyway, adult high schools are usually quite cheap, the courses are at night (good thing for most people), they're available right now and you'll almost surely find courses on the easier subjects (algebra, geometry, basic calculus, etc). It's also very cheap.

    Another option are the community colleges. They too tend to be cheap but they offer higher level courses and the profs are IMO just as good as the university profs. Also, the profs tend to be more accessible for extra help.

  54. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here are a couple of other ways to use your local university:

    (1) You can register as an official auditor. That means you can go to lecture, and usually take exams and have them graded. You won't be able to use the lab, if there is one. This gives you a more official status, and makes it easier to get your exams graded, and so on.

    (2) You can enroll in summer school. A lot of universities have summer sessions that are open to everyone who is over 18, or who has a high school diploma, or who has permission from their high school principal. They charge full rate but you get 6-10 weeks of intensive academic whoop-ass.

    It's up to you whether you can go the independent study + book route. That works fine for math, but it's a personal character thing whether you can discipline yourself to do it.

    Web sites, et cetera, are hokum. A good book is much much better. Just go down to your college bookstore and browse some. If your math is at high school level, browse the "freshmen bonehead math" books.

    It sounds like the real problem is going to be creating a space in your life to work on the math every damn day. Math is hard and takes a lot of sweat. Learning calculus is like, say, running a 10k race -- you are not going to get there with an earnest attitude or even just by buying the magic equipment. You get there by training every day for weeks or months.

    And similarly (speaking as a big math geek and a horrible runner who can barely make 10k) -- don't worry one bit about other people you encounter who are way better than you. When I see some elite runner go by me, I just congratulate myself that I'm on the same path as them, propelling my fat geek ass under my own muscle power. It's okay to be a newbie, especially at something tough. Just get in the game and stay in the game.

  55. Rather broad.... by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

    Asking how to re-learn or even start in mathematics is a rather broad question,....are you in need of starting from pre-calc? the calculus series, or the advanced topics,......?

  56. best solution isn't cheapest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regarding adult toys that help you with math: Consider spending a little extra, and you can get a triple ripple model. It will help you count up to three.

    Uhhh. One. One ripple!

    Nnnn. Two. Two ripples!!

    Mrrrugh. Three. Three ripples!!! Ah ah ah!

    Oh sorry, you wanted a book?

  57. Community Colleges are BETTER by Liora · · Score: 1

    It has been my experience, taking college level math from both a big ten university and two different community colleges that the quality of instruction insofar as MATH classes go (I can make no claims about other classes) is much better. I thought I was bad at math at the U. Now that I am out of school though, I got interested in math and decided to try again. It appears I just had lousy teachers; I am actually fairly good at math.

    There is a difference in student populations too... many of the students at the U were just taking the course because they had to, for a grade. At the community colleges the students are going there (for the most part) because they want to learn, which is a lot better IMHO.

    Either way, higher education is so important that if nothing else you should try snagging some community college notes off a student or two. Many times you can get the instructor-written ones.

    --
    Liora
    1. Re:Community Colleges are BETTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no, you're just lousy at math. Otherwise you wouldn't need an instructor.

      j/k

    2. Re:Community Colleges are BETTER by howlingfrog · · Score: 1

      I've had a similar set of experiences. I have a degree in math from a small, selective liberal arts college (Kenyon College), I took a mid-level course one summer at a Big Ten university (Ohio State, which has an excellent math graduate program), and second-year calculus in high school from a teacher who is now teaching essentially the same class at the local community college (Columbus State). Neither OSU nor CSCC can come close to comparing with my experience at Kenyon, but neither was really bad, and they didn't differ from each other that much. I would never trust a two-year school to teach the humanities or fine arts adequately, but any reputable community college will do a fine job with intro-level math or science.

      --
      The original Howling Frog is a fictional character and has no UID.
  58. same situation by numbuscus · · Score: 1

    I'm in a similar situation.

    I recently opted out of a PhD program in economics and am contemplating going back to school for physics or math. The problem is, I don't have much of a background in physics and my math was primarily focused on stats and linear algebra - both of which are used extensively in economics. What would slashdotters suggest. There have to be a few physics majors out there. Maybe some PhDs?

    I suppose I'll have to go bask to undergrad but...

    1. Re:same situation by geneshifter · · Score: 1

      Hey numbuscus:

      I'm 27 and I am still in graduate school. You want to know why? I changed my mind about the subject area of study right in the middle of things. I have a BS in Biology, and I have taken some 20 hours of graduate Biology work.
      Working in research, I soon found out that the money is really bad and that some computer experience would be very helpful.. i have since decided to get my MS in Computer Science and do a thesis in bioinformatics, combining my past experience with new. You might try something like that.

    2. Re:same situation by numbuscus · · Score: 1

      Yea, I've thought about going into CS, but for some reason it just doesn't sound like something I want to do forever. I would like to go back to school, but going to undergrad at 26 would be annoying. I don't have much choice though - I've got to finish school soon or my wire's going to kill me.

    3. Re:same situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently a senior at RPI majoring in Mathematics and Computer Engineering. In my opinion, I'd suggest getting your math down first before you learn physics, particularly your advanced calculus and differential/partial differential equations.
      For me, which obviously might not be the same for you, I found physics much more enjoyable when I could understand the mathematics behind the 10,000 equations thrown at you in the introductory courses, most of which are just dummed down partial differential equations. A good grasp of standard techniques in solving the equations, or even in analysis will only help you in your endeavour with physics.

    4. Re:same situation by figment · · Score: 2

      Im a Physics/Economics double major graduating senior, going to gradschool in Economics next year...

      I would advise not going for exclusively a physics major, if you're unsure whether that's what you really want to do. Out of all the physics majors i know, very few are in there to actaully do physics research as a career, or many of us start with that intention, then realize how difficult/strange/boring/uninteresting/etc that we think it really is. We have a very large amount of double majors, (Physics/math, physics/finance, physics/chem, some premeds even), where we use the physics courses to teach us how to think, not necessarily for the physics itself.

      Unless you really really want to know/study stuff like the boundary conditions of the fields of a conductor in an oscillating magnetic field, I would stay away from physics as a pure major; but if you wanted to do something like a M.S in Physics w/ a PhD in Economics, your analytic skills for something like IndustrialOrganization or GameTheory (maybe even theoretical econometrics) would be awesome.

    5. Re:same situation by numbuscus · · Score: 1

      Ha - I left an econ PhD program because I hated studying the boundary conditions of the 'no-worse-than' set and the 'no-better-than' set and the production frontier. No, actually, I left becuase I didn't like the way economists deal with 'simple' economic concepts. Don't get me wrong - I love math and especially econometrics/stats - but there are some place I believe math doesn't belong - one of then being the explaination of the preferences of individuals. If you go to grad school in economics, be prepared to make dozens of 'exceptions' to you theories (if outlined mathematically) because people - IMO - don't make mathematically calculated decisions. Of course, I could just be a bitter ex-econ student, who just spent the last six years of his life studying econ only to find he hates it.

      Anyway, as for physics, that sounds just about right to me. I want to be cooped up in a lab measuring and calculating and measuring and calulating...

      Yea, we'll see in another 6 years.

      Cheers --

  59. Community Colleges by ThomasMis · · Score: 3, Informative

    Get ready to mod this -1 redundant.

    As an undergraduate I had a minor in mathematics. I've been out of school for a few years and was interested in taking the GRE. In order to prepare for the quantitative section of the GRE I enrolled in a 5 week summer evening math course at my local community college. The course was titled "college algebra", it was basically stuff you should already know coming out of high school. However, it was wonderful. A perfect refresher for somebody who hasn't writen a proof or solved a quadratic since college. I enjoyed the experience so much that I'm enrolling in more classes this fall. I have found that community colleges are wonderful resources, but more importantly tuition is dirt cheap. $67.00 a credit hour here. I can't stress this enough, tuition doesn't get any cheaper than that anywhere in the US.

    --
    Check out my podcast: DreamStation.cc Video Game Show
  60. do what i did... by barabbi · · Score: 1

    Read a few college math course syllabus (syllabi? ) and buy the books that the class would be using.

    I suggest a good college as your baseline.

    http://www-math.mit.edu/undergraduate/class-textbo oks.html

    --
    We are all geeks, just admit it and get on with your life. ;>
  61. use your time well by hopeless+case · · Score: 1

    Find a good book on the area of math you are interested in then keep it on you as you run all the errands of your day. I highly recommend Gilbert Strang's books. He is the one of the best explainers of math around.

    If you go to a doctor's office, and they make you wait for 45 minutes, then that's 45 minutes you can use to read the book.

    I ironically discovered an interest in math shortly after the birth of my first son (although I had studied more post high school math than you did). What amazed me, however, was how much good I could get out of 45 minutes here and there when I was really interested in a subject and always kept the book I was working on handy. If you only get a few hours a week in, but keep at it, you'd be suprised how much you learn in just a few months.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:use your time well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.

      Strang was interesting, most notably because he always related math to real-world problems. I found his texts to be a bit on the wordy side, although I tend to pick up things fairly quickly.

      Polya (as a previous poster stated), however, is excellent. A bit less emphasis on real-world problems, but a bit more concise than Strang.

  62. Try video by cheesebot · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Teaching Company has great audio and video lectures on all subjects by reknown professors. Though they may seem a bit expensive, try requesting your local public library to order a set. I know I've ordered them for people when I worked in a library.

    Here's a link to their Science & Math courses: http://www.teachco.com/ttcstore/CoursesBySubject.a sp?Sbj=10

    1. Re:Try video by pivo · · Score: 1

      Hey! Yeah, I love this company. I've been listening to their courses for a long time now. I can't believe how much information I've picked up over the last few years listening to their courses on my walk to work. I haven't listened to much science/math stuff though, its mostly humanities I'm interested in.

  63. Where are you starting? by coyote-san · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mathematics is one of those fields where there's a huge variety of topics covered by a single label. What does "math" mean to you, and what are you interested in?

    If you're interested in calculus (differential equations, dynamic systems, chaos, etc.), you would probably be best served by getting a current university calculus book and Maple/MathLab/Mathematica/whatever and working through it. The software handles the mechanical aspects of the process and you'll probably find the material easier to pick up than before.

    Same thing if you're interested in number theory (cryptology, matrices, etc.) If you get an introductory text designed to work with one of these programs it will handle the mechanical grunt work and allow you to focus on the concepts.

    If your interest is precalculus (algebra, trig, etc.), you may be better off working through the problems by hand. You want the software to be a tool, not a crutch, and one of the main reasons for the usual introductory sequence (up through PDQ) is just to train the students how to reliably perform the necessary work.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  64. Why do you want to? by 3am · · Score: 2

    Seriously, what subject matter interests you. That makes all the difference.

    --

    A: None. The Universe spins the bulb, and the Zen master merely stays out of the way.
  65. 3D Game Programming by sdjunky · · Score: 1

    Same thing happened to me. Once I started 3d game programming I understood that I needed to learn geometry.

    Not only have I learned it but I understand it pretty well also since the things that I learn can be applied in a virtual world so I can see the effect of sin, cos and tan etc.

  66. I was in the same position by casio282 · · Score: 2

    I was in the same position as you about a year ago...I had done advanced calculus stuff in high school about 12 years ago, and really enjoyed it, but somehow let it drop when I got to university. I bought a couple of calculus text books for a refresher and took off for a train ride across the country with them (!). I found it came back to me fairly well, but it was difficult without the structure of a classroom w/required assignments, etc.

    If you're just interested in exploring some (fairly) current math theory and less in the mechanics of solving problems, I highly recommend a book called "mathematics: the new golden age" by Keith Devlin. It covers such topics as primes and factoring them, set theory, topology, etc. It was a little over my head, but in the good way -- it forced me to stretch and although there were things I didn't quite get, it was really enjoyable.

    just my 2c, hope it's helpful...good luck!

    --

    :wq
  67. hava a go at the books... by samantha · · Score: 2

    I would try doing the books first and see if I could find a math brain friend or two who would be willing to help me over the rough spots. I've done this before. Between hs and college I took 7 years to "find myself". When I decided to to college I brought my math back up to speed and taught myself two semesters of calculus to boot. I started with second semester calculus in college (and a linear algebra course also) and aced both of them. But then I've always been a math nut. YMMV

  68. Find a Tutor by theBraindonor · · Score: 1

    It is obvious from you post that you are willing to put in time on your own to understand the material. Your best bet would be to call a local university or high school and find a math tutor. A tutor would provide you someone who already knows the answers without having to waste time sitting in a lecture hall or watching a teacher at the blackboard.

    I have tutored several older students who had decided to go back to school. Some were furthering their education, others were completing it after an extended absence. Whatever the case, they needed a person who knew the answers to their questions and had the patience to sit down with them.

    If you really do have the motivation, a couple of hours every other weekend with a tutor would start you on your way to a better understanding of mathematics.

  69. I was thinking the same thing.... by zensmile · · Score: 1

    A few weeks ago I started to really think about all of the math that I missed or didn'tpay that much attention to in high school and college. Most of my study was on liberal art topics and not sciences, nor mathmatics.

    I went to my local Borders Books and picked up a copy of Algebra for Dummies. It helped to knock the rust off of my math memories. After finishing the Algebra book, I plan on getting Geometry for Dummies, Precalculus: A Self-Teaching Guide (Self-Teaching Guide) by Stephen L. Slavin, Mathematics at Work: Practical Applications of Arithmetic, Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry, and Logarithms to the Step-By-Step Solutions of mechanica by Henry H. Ryffel, and Basic Physics: A Self-Teaching Guide (Self-Teaching Guide) by Karl F. Kuhn.

    I carefully looked through the books and reviews on Amazon.com. I think that when I am finished going over these books...i will have quenched my thirst for mathmatics revival!

  70. Great Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Check out this book. Its a really cool book on all aspects of math that most people care about written like prose with LOTS of problems (& solutions!).

    Reviewer: Jodee C Wickert from Salt Lake City A truly beautiful book, by an author (incidentally not a mathematician by trade) who clearly has a passion for the subject. As Peter Hilton writes in the forward, echoing GH Hardy, mathematics is worth doing for its own sake. Hilton further contends that an educated person must understand mathematics as well as any other field. This book--suitable for both mathematicians and those with less training in the field--covers the entirety of mathematics from basic counting princicples through differential equations and sprinkles interesting historical anecdotes throughout. I can give it no higher endorsement than to point out that both Martin Gardner and Philip Morrison count it as an invaluable and indispensable reference.

    ISBN: 039304002X

  71. A mathematical tourist? by Yoko99 · · Score: 1

    You could also decide what field of maths you dig the most by browsing "The Mathematical Tourist" by Ivars Peterson. http://www.maa.org/mathland/mathtrek_5_11_98.html

    Very inspiring.

  72. this is the reason... by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    ...some of us are opposed to putting computers in every classroom...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  73. try some problems by nuggets · · Score: 3, Interesting

    hey, here's an idea: try working some math problems. there are tons of resources on the web from math contests that were originally given to high school students all the way up through graduate students. try working some of them - you can often find elegant solutions published right along the problems after you have tried to solve them. here's a couple of links to good problem repositories:

    http://www.unl.edu/amc/a-activities/a7-problems/ pr oblemarchive.html

    http://www.unl.edu/amc/a-activities/a7-problems/ pu tnam/index.html

    and to order copies of easier (though still very interesting) exams:

    http://www.unl.edu/amc/d-publication/publication .h tml

    good luck,
    jeff.

  74. Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a math prof at a small private college. My students who have taken courses at community colleges repeatedly tell me that the classes are so much better at our school than at community colleges. At small private colleges, your math courses are taught by real, professional mathematicians with Ph.Ds. The Ph.D. is not always directly relevant, but it does give your professor the authority to look far ahead of your current coursework and tell you what is relevant and what is not.

    Community college professors are usually masters (or less) degree instructors, perhaps working part time teaching while also doing other jobs. They have far fewer rigorous evaluations of their teaching, and they do absolutely no real mathematics research, so they don't really know what mathematics is actually important and what isn't.

    Professors at big universities also have Ph.Ds and do research, of course, but they are paid primarily to conduct research and teach graduate students; undergrads are the lowest priority for them.

    1. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by raresilk · · Score: 2
      But would your college accept a student who had a job, kids, and little money, and didn't want a degree but just to pick up a little advanced math in night school? I doubt it. Even if you did, it would probably cost $1000 per credit hour, and this guy can't afford it. Please get real - would your school even let him in the door?

      --
      No, no, no. This is not a sig.
    2. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2
      At small private colleges, your math courses are taught by real, professional mathematicians with Ph.Ds. The Ph.D. is not always directly relevant, but it does give your professor the authority to look far ahead of your current coursework and tell you what is relevant and what is not.

      Why is the word "private" there? State universities also focus primarily on teaching and have Ph.D. and research requirements. Compared to private colleges, they charge lower tuition and pay higher salaries to their faculty.

    3. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh, did you look at the original question? A primary concern was the COST.

      Let me repeat that for you. THE COST.

      Private colleges are f-ing expensive and cater to working-people like the DMV (open 9:30-4).

      You might have a PhD in math, but your reading skills are poor.

    4. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to a community college then to a small college. I found that I learned more with the CC instructer because they wanted to help. What degree the instructer has does not matter. What does matter is the instructer wanting to help you do well.

    5. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by john82 · · Score: 1

      Where in the world do you get off making suching an inflammatory and unsubstantiated statement as "they do absolutely no real mathematics research, so the don't know what mathematics is actually important and what isn't"?

      What if I were to jump to similarly wild-assed assumptions that since you are posting anonymously:
      1) You are not a Math Prof (let alone a PhD)
      2) Your "small private college" doesn't have proper accreditation in mathematics.

      Good grief. Check your institutional biases at the door next time.

    6. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by davidu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is such utter and complete FUD it is nuts.

      From personal observations and anecdotal evidence I can safely say that community college courses on the whole are far better then four-year university courses. The professors who teach them take a genuine interest in your success as well as a compasionate atitude towards individual students.

      I attend a top US university and I can safely say the mathematics department here hasn't done any cutting edge research aside from the weekly acid trip. One of my good friends is going down the path towards becoming a math professor to stay near the young girls and the good drugs. I'd be surprised if it wasn't the same at other so-called "top schools".

      -davidu

      --

      # Hack the planet, it's important.
    7. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only have a limited point of refrence for the quality of Community College Math instruction. I have taken Calc II and III, DiffEq, and Linear Algebra at Mesa Community College in AZ. Every instructor except one had both a love of teaching and a love of Math. The other just had a love of math. She also taught at ASU and was just teaching night class at the CC for career reasons. One of the other instructors did not get her degrees untill after raising a family. But when you entered her classroom, you could almost feel her love of math. I can not think of anything better then to take a course taught by someone who truely loves the subject. When I see a cool proof, Iget excited. It is nice to have an instructor who sees the same thing. Being an amature mathamatician, I have often talked to the Math Dept. staff regarding something I was working on. It seems most people I talked to, loved Math. One of the other Instructors also taught my HS Calc Class. He has got to be one of the best math instructors in the world. He fueled my intrest in math and motivated me to explore. It was because of him that I learned Abstract Algebra and Advanced Calculus. He also showed me that a proof is a preciouse work of art whos beauty goes way beyond the end result.

    8. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      State universities also tend to be very large. Classes are often taught by graduate assistants and/or in huge auditoriums with hundreds of other students. Sometimes graduate assistants are good, but on the whole probably not any better than community college instructors.

    9. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by numbuscus · · Score: 1

      To a point, I agree. I spent my first two years at a community college, which was a good choice for me since I didn't feel that I was grown-up enough to study at a 'real' school. The classes at the community college were good, but they really did lack something - student-professor interaction and cutting-edge knowledge. And I went to CC in Oregon, which has very high regard for CCs and, IMO, I received a very good CC education.

      However, my education at CC still couldn't prepare me for the academic rigor of a small private college. Man, was it a wake up call. It was so much more difficult in terms of the amount of material and the difficulty of the material covered. Still, the professors were extremely easy to talk to - we even had drinks together (after I turned 21 that is). For me, the experience at a private college was far superior to the one I got from CC.

      But I'm not sure that is what the poster is looking for. Private school is way too time consuming for someone wha has to work and has kids. Not to mention the expense. But he may want to see if any of the private schools offer cheap, summer courses or 'extension' services. I know - from experience - that these are often available, even at the best schools.

    10. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2

      State universities are usually much smaller than research universities. Think "California State University San Bernardino", and not "University of California San Diego". State universities, unlike research universities, typically don't have any graduate assistants, because they don't have graduate programs. All teaching is done by full-time faculty with a Ph.D.

    11. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by crossconnects · · Score: 0

      At the community college where I studied, the professors all had at least masters, while some had PhD's. They were full time instructors and were strongly encouraged to go for the PhD. I learned a lot. This community college is ranked among the best in the country.
      I have since earned a BS in math.

      --
      no big sig
    12. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This may be true in some cases but it is most certainly not true in all cases, and probably not even not for the majority. Let me start by saying that I have taken mathematics courses at a community college, a small private university, and at a large tier 1 research university. Here are some of my observations:

      Community College
      If you are going to take any class at a community college find out who is teaching it first and what there background is. It is true that some instructors at this level will not know mush more beyond the level that the class is being taught at. However, in most community colleges there are a number of Ph.D. instructors teaching mathematics. Additionally it is possible to take classes from actual researchers who teach nights depending on the area that you live in. In fact, all of the mathematics courses I took at community college were taught by instructors who had their Ph.D.s.

      Small Private Colleges
      Here most mathematics instructors will be Ph.D. level. However it is ususally the case that they are being payed primarily to teach, not to do research. At the school that I was at professors were expected to spend approximately 20% of their time on their research. Nevertheless, they will almost always know a considerable amount more than what is covered in the book. Note that this certainly doesn't mean that the class will be better, but the possibility is there.

      Tier 1 research universities
      If you want to really study mathematics then there really is no substitute for going to a larger school. The professors here are serious mathematicians, who spend the majority of their day doing mathematics. It's true that undergraduates are of a low priority here, but if you take the more advanced level courses that the professors actually want to be teaching then, from my experience, the undergraduates are treated on a similar level as the graduates(at least the first/second year graduates). Additionally, the larger schools usually have more involved students, active colloquia, seminars, etc. that are sparse within the smaller schools.

    13. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want get caught up in your math skills its much more important to find good math educators that good math researchers.

      Up through basic calculus you certainly don't need a Ph.D. to teach well.

      I've had plenty of teachers in high school without their masters that were better teachers than some of the Ph.D.s here in college.

    14. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Most state universities have graduate mathematics programs and offer teaching assistantships as well as tuition waivers to the grad students. In fact your example CSUSB has a master's program. Oregon State has a Ph.D program that fully funds their grad students through teaching. So does Illinois state, as does Iowa state, etc. Additionaly, from your example again, Dee Matthews teaches at CSUSB and does not have a Ph.D.

    15. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by sakti · · Score: 1

      Professors at big universities also have Ph.Ds and do research, of course, but they are paid primarily to conduct research and teach graduate students; undergrads are the lowest priority for them.

      This is one reason why community college teachers can actually be better (in this context). They are there to teach, not research. Many of these professors are there for the research and teaching is a _very_ low priority to them. I have 2 masters and I know from whence I speak.

      I actually had one professor who taught a grand total of 3 classes all quarter, the rest of the time he had the graduate students do presentations. Sometimes he was there and sometimes not. It was a pathetic waste of nearly 2 grand.

      --
      "It is better to die on one's feet than to live on one's knees." - Albert Camus
    16. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Jester99 · · Score: 2

      Most colleges with a school or dept. of continuing education accept almost exclusively students who have jobs, kids, and little money, and don't neccessarily want degrees, but just want to pick up a little advanced math in night school.

    17. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2

      Ok, you're right. Back to the private/public question though: do private colleges utilize significantly less adjunct faculty/teaching assistants than public colleges?

    18. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, definitely.

    19. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't go to UCSD do you?

    20. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, but I live in delmar and I certainly know the profs at UCSD drop a hit or two every now and again (and again).

      Miracosta prof's are ten times better.

    21. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by delong · · Score: 2

      Well Mr. Math Prof you don't get out much obviously. As often as not, the classes at the local community college are taught by the same faculty as the local University, or the CC is a branch of the Uni.

      Penn State and Penn State:Hazleton is one example. The Houston Community College System is another. HCCS is staffed in good part by profs from Rice and the UoH.

      The fellow in question is interested in learning some mathematics, not going on a math nerd cruise of the latest and greatest research institute. And to insinuate that a Master in Math isn't "good enough" to teach funamental mathematics is not just insulting, its damn stupid.

      Derek

    22. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your math department sucks that bad, guess what... your school isn't one of the top in the country.

      The shear idiocy of your post is outstanding, and you think you go to one of the top schools in the nation. Let me guess - Stanford or UC Berkeley?

    23. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Pig+Bodine · · Score: 1

      I am a math professor at a four year university. I'll make the ad hominem note that a lot of people most critical of math teaching are flunking math because: 1. they aren't doing the work 2. they aren't coming to class 3. they get caught cheating (the most common way to fail my course last semester). Which is not to say that teaching isn't bad sometimes; but there are also a lot of people who just won't do the work and then act angry and blame the teacher when the natural results follow.

      Obviously teaching varies from place to place. The comment that at major universities the professors are mostly concerned with grad students and research is probably true for a significant number of professors---but not all professors for all courses. This is worse the lower the course: it's a cold truth, but very few people with a PhD relish teaching high-school level math. In fact, even at a major university I'd wager very few people teaching such courses have a PhD.

      On the other hand, although I've known some pretty dedicated community college teachers, the chances of getting a decent course in multivariable calculus or differential equations much less abstract algebra or analysis at a community college is not good. I'd say make up any pre-college level math at a community college and then switch to a university if you want to follow it through or past calculus.

      For someone who is self motivated and just needs a refresher on rusty math skills in algebra, self-study with any decent text-book should also work. Just make yourself work problems with the discipline you would if you had to turn them in.

    24. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2

      The post did not compare university courses with college courses, it was comparing small private colleges with community colleges and large universities.

      Re-read (or read) the last two paragraphs where community colleges and large universities are mentioned.

    25. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by raresilk · · Score: 2
      I have never known of a department of continuing education at the type of "small private college" that was described. On the contrary, departments of continuing education are (at least in the US) pretty much exclusively found at the megalopolis state school and -- guess where -- the very community colleges that the post to which I replied was dissing up one side and down the other. Did you not read his post? Or did you just not think your response through?

      --
      No, no, no. This is not a sig.
    26. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by MadAhab · · Score: 2
      Right. For example, the head count at the Harvard Extension School is much larger than the undergraduate head count. And sometimes, courses are taught by the same professors. And you can enroll for single courses as you wish.

      Always check with whatever colleges are local to see what's available.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    27. Re:Small private colleges are WAY better by AxelBoldt · · Score: 2
      Well, I can't verify this but I trust your word on it.

      It seems that then the best option for the guy is to sign up at a small local public university for a class that is taught by a professor.

  75. book recomendations by poincare · · Score: 1
    skip the classes and just read the books:

    calculus - Stewart
    real analysis - Rudin or Strichartz
    abstract algebra - Fraleigh
    linear algebra - Axler
    complex analysis - Conway or Brown
    combinatorial game theory - Berlekamp [winning ways for your mathematical plays].

    I've also found the Schaum's outline series to be quite useful, although you probably want to have a "standard" text around too.

  76. MOD PARENT UP by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...he said what I meant but better...

  77. NOVA jokes by trikyguy · · Score: 0

    The best one i've heard is...
    NOVA the N is for knowledge.
    Of course when you say it, it sounds better.

    --

    Discussion Never Hurt Anyone.
    Libertarians
  78. Distance Learning by tsross · · Score: 1

    You might want to try distance learning from local colleges. I know Texas A&M and Tech Texas offer it here in Texas. The courses give you college credit but let you learn at your own pace. You usually have 6 months to complete the curriculum that they send you and you'll have to take a final exam at an "approved testing facility". You're assigned a professor so if you have any questions, send them an e-mail. I turned in the majority of my coursework via e-mail. I believe the course only cost me a couple hundred bucks and I never had to sit through a single English class!!!

  79. Book Recommendation! by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Forgotten Algebra
    Barron's
    0812019432

    Apologies if you're beyond this, but it is EXCELLENT if you're thinking of going to a
    college level algebra class. Takes a few weeks
    to work through. You'll be ready for intermediate
    algebra or precalc when done.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  80. Well... by brogdon · · Score: 2

    Personally, I'd start by proving the Riemann Hypothesis. At that point you can take the million dollar prize and hire a few Nobel Laureates as tutors.

    --


    This tagline is umop apisdn.
  81. Get Physics2000 on CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an astonishing physics and calculus textbook. It gives intuitive explanations for Newtonian and relativistic physics. It was written by a Dartmouth physics professor who captures his 30 years of teaching techniques. And the calculus textbook is a delight to read as well.

    You can read more at:

    http://physics2000.com/

    The best part? It's $10 for the CD; $25 if you want the CD and a printed manual.

  82. -1 Troll... by xtermz · · Score: 2

    The guys whole point is he's trying to re-learn math AFTER COLLEGE. Who gives a fuck about the 'college experience'. He wants to learn math. Not hook up with drunk co-eds and go to 'protest marches'. Go back and re-read the post...

    --


    I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
    1. Re:-1 Troll... by dylan_- · · Score: 2

      He wants to learn math. Not hook up with drunk co-eds

      Oh. Are the two mutually exclusive? Damn... ;-)

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  83. Doctor Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gonna remain an anonymous coward because in real life I'm an overpaid programmer, but here's my advice: Go to www.drmath.com. That's solved a lot of math problems for me. Everything from simple to unsimple stuff in there.

  84. Try To Get Your Work to Pay by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

    And by this I mean- see if you can do your learning at work. I don't know what you do so I'm not sure how practical this is for you. But I can totally relate to your situation.

    I've got 2 toddlers, I don't spend enough time w/them and my wife as it is and I don't have spare cash or time for school.

    So what I do when I want to put some decent time in learning something I try to find a way to make it a function of my job.

    I'm a programmer- when I want to learn something new I start working on a way to make it fit into the company's needs. Now that is kind of an easy thing to do sometimes I'll admit. Sometimes I have to be creative.

    If you work for a company w/better employee policies than mine they may pay for you take classes on the clock. That, I would think, would be ideal.

    But say these ideas are just way out there- you're a night security guy. Well if you are allowed to read while you are gaurding whatever- the book ideas come in handy.

    I've found that when there is little leeway in my personal life I just need to look hard at ways to create that leeway on the job. (I justify my time on slashdot when I find out about current computing issues that affect the company- happens more often than you would think- and my boss is cool w/it)

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  85. Re:because mathematicians have a sense of humor to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn thats funny. I just about spit soda all over my laptop. Too bad no one else here will get it. Thats way funnier than this gem.

    Whats yellow and equivalent to the Axiom of Choice?

    Zorn's Lemon

  86. Use online resources by Brad+Lucier · · Score: 1
    There are 125 online math texts listed at dmoz. Other good resources include George Cain's page, the World Wide Web Virtual Library and Alexandre Stefanov's list

    Shameless plug: I started an online publishing company that distributes PDF texts free of charge for students' self-study. Our first book is designed to help the student move on from Calculus to more rigorous mathematics.

  87. Chris Hecker's homepage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is game oriented, but quite useful:

    Here

  88. Re:Mathematics by sllort · · Score: 1

    Sure, that's a terrific site.
    Can you assure everyone that you found it yourself?
    Availability of links such as these on Google is abundant.
    Thanks for the link, though.

  89. Saxon Math by brandonj · · Score: 1

    Saxon is a publisher of VERY well written math books. It explains everything in easy to understand detail, with a slightly different approach to teaching it. Why every school in the US doesn't use these books is beyond me, but I taught myself using these books and they work very well. Of course they cover topics you would find in k-12 schools (I belive they go as far as calculus), I don't know if they go beyond that.
    My little sister is in high school, and she brings home her math homework, opens the saxon book she has at home, learns it, then does her assignment. The book she works out of from school tells nothing about the concept it is teaching, and the teachers don't teach it well enough to really understand it - so she learns from the saxon book.
    www.saxonpublishers.com is their web page, hope this helps,

    Brandon

  90. I've Recently Done the same thing by rugwuk · · Score: 1

    I recently found myself in the exact same position and ended up committing myself to night classes at my local city college for the grand total of $79, plus $70 for the text book for Algebra II. This was a 16 week course!

    It was three nights a week and i too was busy at work, but told my Boss that i was doing this and that he would need to understand my needs and motivation etc, blah...

    I thoroughly enjoyed it and am sitting advanced trig, series and pre calculus this fall. I found that i can do this work myself but that sitting a test at the end of the day gave me the confidence that i had really figured this stuff out.

    You may want to teach yourself the easy stuff and then take classes for the more advanced courses. Its worth the time and effort, cos i got an A and now feel like i am not the dumb mathling that i thought i was.

    --
    Its one damn thing before another. (Dick Bird 1999)
    1. Re:I've Recently Done the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb mathling? That's debatable. Certainly if I thought I wasn't a dumb mathling I wouldn't be abbreviating "because" as "cos" knowing that the accepted common abbreviation for "cosine" is "cos"..

  91. Just in Time by clay.campbell · · Score: 1

    http://www.aw.com/catalog/academic/product/1,4096, 0201669749,00.html This is a good source. Just in Time, its just full of good examples.

  92. Begin by Reading the Ancients by belloc · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you want to learn mathematics, the worst place to start is with a high school or college textbook. The second worst place to start is with a high school or college class, if only because they tend to rely on the textbooks.

    Rather, you should begin your study of mathematics by reading the Ancient mathematicians. Begin with Euclid. In reading the Elements, you'll quickly discover that Euclid has presented a complete science (from self-evident first principles to logical conclusions) that includes truths about geometry (continuous quantity), number (discrete quantity), even the foundations of algebra (Elements, Book II). The Elements culminates with the constrution of the Five Perfect (or Platonic) Solids, the proofs of which are marvelous to behold.

    In reading Euclid you'll not only create a rock-solid mathematical foundation for yourself, but you'll also:
    • Gain insight into the minds of the ancients (Plato would not let anyone into his school who hadn't mastered the geometry of the Elements),
    • Improve your reasoning skills (Abraham Lincoln read Euclid when he decided to supplement his education later in life), and
    • Be exposed to some of the most beautiful things that mathematics - or any academic pursuit - has to offer ("Euclid alone has looked on beauty bare." --Edna St. Vincent Millay)


    After you've finished with Euclid, move on to Apollonius' Conics, a beautiful work, a thousand times more complete and wonderful in its treatment of conic sections than you'll find in any modern analytic geometry textbook. You may also want to look at works by guys like Archimedes, whose early work on the infinite inspired the Classical develompent of the Calculus.

    With this firm foundation, you'll be able to read and understand the mathematics of Descartes, whose treatment of geometry (notably the solution of the four-line locus) was key in the development of algebraic notation. And if you stick with it, you can probably read Newton's Principia, Leibniz, and other later Classical mathematicians. I'd stay away from 20th century mathematics, at least at first. There's lots more joy for the amateur mathematician in reading and understanding these Ancient and Classical works than there is in trying to decipher some of the work that has been done recently (within the past 100 years).

    Whatever you do, read original works. They are infinitely more understandable than textbooks and other secondary sources. Find someone or a small group of people to discuss them with. Ask each other what each author is doing, what assumptions he has made, what he thinks he has proven (if anything). Memorize proofs, especially with Euclid.

    There is lots more that you can do, just with the authors I've named here, but at the very least, even if you ultimately decide to take a college course or something, get yourself a copy of Euclid's Elements. It's a singularly wonderful work, and you'll be very glad you did.

    Belloc
    --
    I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
    1. Re:Begin by Reading the Ancients by kmellis · · Score: 2
      I wonder if you're a johnnie like me. In any event, I heartily concur with your recomendations.

      But, again, as I've said elsewhere, this type of comprehension does not prepare one sufficiently to do the type of work that people actually do now. But if you learn what they know, you'll understand the subject much better.

      A footnote. As is the case with physics, I do think that eventually one needs to have at least a general understanding of what has happened in 20th century mathematics. To my mind, everything that came before is the (mostly) comfortable beginning to a story that takes a very surprising and discomfitting turn. I believe that there's something very important going on here; and, in fact, these 20th developments essentially reexamine foundational ideas and reinterpret them. Some might say undermining them. Which is pretty darn weird since these developments are the culmination of what they seem to repudiate. This is incredibly fascinating and provocative to me. So, not hitting the 20th might leave the student with a false idea of where we at present.

    2. Re:Begin by Reading the Ancients by belloc · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you're a johnnie like me.

      No, I'm not, sorry. ;)

      I do think that eventually one needs to have at least a general understanding of what has happened in 20th century mathematics.

      Yeah, I do too, and that's why I said "at least not at first". Most people begin their education at the end instead of at the beginning, and I was just warning against that.

      But besides that, I think that for the non-mathematician, the 20th century stuff is VERY difficult to understand. It tends to be rather abstract, primarily because it often begins with principles that do not arise from common sense, it uses current and past terminology equivocally, and tends to be so specialized that in some cases there are only a handful of people in the whole world that understand a given field.

      But I suppose the inherent difficulties found in most 20th C. maths would make it harder for the layman/amateur to find his way in, regardless. In mathematics, unlike many other sciences, we have such wonderful, clear, and true examples of the science laid out for us so perfectly by such as Euclid and Apollonius, that it would be a shame for one who wants to love maths not to begin with them!

      Belloc

      --
      I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
    3. Re:Begin by Reading the Ancients by kmellis · · Score: 2
      Well, obviously I agree wholeheartedly.

      It's a fascinating thing to watch terms evolve. To pretty much repeat what I already wrote, I get almost breathless when I consider the increasing generalization that eventually contradicts the original usage's common sense coining. Obviously not just terms, but concepts.

      It goes without saying just how badly the Greeks would go apeshit if they were presented with mathematics as it is now. And its arguable that Euclid with his strictness about not mixing different "kinds" in a ratio, the secret of incommensurability by the Pythagoreans, all kinds of stuff, that they had already glimpsed the abyss and refused to attempt to cross it. But their intellectual descendents did, and for damn good reasons. Furthermore, we could probably show them how it so often repeated that a more generalized mathematical concept that they would find abhorrent ended up being validated by physics. We'll put aside their antipathy for empiricism. (Although, is that the essential problem? If you're a mathematician, though, I think you can probably show lots of examples where, over and over, this sort of thing became compellingly necessary completely within the context of mathematics.)

      At St. John's, a very interesting thing happens. Since it's a set curriculum of the "Great Books", it draws students with a fairly wide variety of intellectual predispositions. Of course, even if someone thinks of themselves as a literature person, they understand that they'll have to understand Lobachevsky, so they're not your typical student in any event. Even so, people that are very humanities oriented or even describe themselves as being mathephobes, will commonly become deeply enamored of math at the college, and leave to major in math elsewhere, or go to graduate school in math. I think that's a wonderful thing, and it indicates to me that math at the secondary school level is being mistaught. All the beauty is being leeched out of it.

    4. Re:Begin by Reading the Ancients by belloc · · Score: 1

      All the beauty is being leeched out of it.

      That's a very intriguing thing to say. Do you think that mathematics is beautiful (I do.)? But lots of people would balk at such a notion. By what principle can you predicate beauty of mathematics? The medievals had a saying: Beauty is that which, upon being seen, pleases. [Pulchra enim dicuntur quae visa placent.] How, then, would mathematics be beautiful? (I'm not talking about the visible beauty of parabolae here, obviously. I'm talking about beauty in proofs and truths and such).

      I'd be interested in your thoughts on the matter, as a Johnnie. I may not be one, but I know what one is. ;)

      It's been something that I've thought about for quite some time now, and it would be nice to have some feedback from someone with your background.

      You can write to this address if you want (make logical adjustments to it): chesterbelloc@@@hotmail...com

      Belloc

      --
      I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
    5. Re:Begin by Reading the Ancients by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but I heartily disagree with the author of the above comment! I think this is TERRIBLE advice! The ancients have their place, but Euclid's rigor would be WAAY too much for someone who's getting back into the swing of things!

      Reading the ancients is a very romantic idea -- let's start at the beginning of mathematical history, and move in a clean linear progression through calculus to modern abstract mathematics. It's a very straightforward approach. Unfortunately though, this approach would take decades to do, surely boring any novice out of their mind in the process. Plus, if they'd read the ancients, they'd miss all the cool applications of mathematics today!

      And telling someone learning mathematics to _memorize_ proofs is like telling someone learning english to memorize passages from Beowulf.

    6. Re:Begin by Reading the Ancients by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      I believe that Euclid's elements was, in fact, a textbook...oh, how the standards have fallen.

      5 postulates (give or take a few) => 45 theorems.

      Many modern geometry textbooks present a new postulate on every page. Awful stuff. "Hey, kids! If you begin with a huge mess of postulates, you can produce a huge mess of theorems!"

  93. Cliff's Notes by nullard · · Score: 2

    There are great Cliff's Notes for math. I picked up the one for Calculus before taking the course. It came with a CD that had great visualizations, etc. The book was great. It had quick reference cards, was well organized, and was short and to the point. I preffered it to my actual text for that class.

    The version of the CD that I have doesn't work under OS 9, much less X, but I'm sure they've updated it by now. I don't know what kind of support it has for Linux or Windows. I know it did work with some version of Windows, but Linux support is probably poor.

    --


    t'nera semordnilap
  94. Some Books by SparafucileMan · · Score: 1

    I'd start off reading some of the bridging books that introduce undergraduates to abstract math, proof structure, etc. I'm actually reading "Bridge to Abstract Mathematics", by Ronald Morash, ISBN 394-35429-X, "How to Read and Do Proofs" and "The Keys to Advanced Mathematics: Recurrent Themes in Abstract Reasoning" and I highly recommend all of them. They won't cover any specific subjects, but I've been struggling with undergraduate mathematics myself lately and have found these books invaluable.

  95. Agreed! Get some decent software, too. by js7a · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The parent comment is an excellent idea, but after you've brushed up with textbooks, if you want to know where the cutting edge of math is really these days, there is no substitute for interactive software.

    You should start by looking at every single function in the header file "math.h" in ANSI C (Appendix B of Kernigan & Ritchie) and for each of them ask yourself "what exactly does this function do?"

    Then you need some math programs. You only really need one from each of two categories. You need one serious number crunching program, and one serious algebra program.

    For number crunching, I recommend "Octave" (which is free but hard to compile correctly unless there is already a binary for your platform), "Matlab" (which will run you several hundreds of dollars but you can probably get a used copy with a want ad or an auction site), or a spreadsheet with a sufficient coverage of library functions, such as Excel. I recommend them in that order.

    In addition to a number cruncher, you will want a computer algebra system (which will also do calculus and "higher" math): Maple, Matlab, and Macsyma; again, I recommend them in that order.

  96. Advice from a math professor by Walker · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a math professor at a liberal arts university and we have a "non-traditional" student (he hates it when I call him that) who went back to school for reasons like the one you mention. However, he has is doing it full time; he was a fairly successful consultant/businessman and took early retirement. Sounds like you don't have that option.

    If you have a fairly week background in mathematics, you are going to need to "go to school". By this I do not mean that you have to register for a class. I mean that you need to be around people who are learning mathematics and talk with them - a lot. Students will typically tell you that they learn most of their mathematics not from the classroom setting, but talking with other students. Especially at the early levels, learning mathematics is very similar to learning a foreign language; to really learn it you must surround yourself with people who speak the language.

    Our non-traditional student has learned this lesson well. For all intents and purposes, he lives in the math lounge across from the department. He even does non-math homework there just so he can be around when someone comes in to study math. He also gets the bonus the faculty come in and talk to him when they need a break. We don't always talk about the material he his studying; sometimes we talk about something that was in the news or something we are working on. But whatever we talk about increases his math vocabulary and exposes him to the important concepts in mathematics.

    If all you do is night classes, you will not get this, even if you go to some of the best teaching schools in the country. And you certainly won't get this from reading books. So what is there to do? Many good liberal arts universities have math clubs that are intended to "popularize mathematics" and draw in new majors to the department.

    A lot of times, these clubs pull in speakers to talk about jobs in mathematics. However, these clubs also farm for Putnam contestants (the big undergraduate mathematics competition) and hence sometimes work on problems. Putnam problems can often be understood with very little mathematics (though their solution is far from simple).

    So, if you have a liberal arts university in your area, you might want to check if they have a math club (And whether it actually does math, or is just a social club). These typically meet in the evening and would give yourself an opportunity to surround yourself with other people learning math. This is not a substitute for learning math, however. You will still need to start either reading or taking night courses in order to learn the basic "grammar".

    1. Re:Advice from a math professor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a math professor at a liberal arts university ...
      If you have a fairly week background in mathematics,


      Or a weak background in spelling? ;-)

  97. Grab Some Books by Prof_Dagoski · · Score: 2



    I was kinda in the same boat. Due to lousy math innstruction in HS and a dumbass mistake on a placement test in said HS, I barely got out with algebra. Not good for someone going into physics. I took a remdial self paced course in trig and analysis as freshman. There are a several good books written as college level remedial math course. Check your local community college bookstore for some of these. Meanwhile, my science book club sent me a really fun book. The title is something like _Mathematics_Through_History_. The author develops mathematical concepts as mankind discovered them through time. It takes you all the way from math as homo erectus might have done all the way to pre calc and some calculus as well. It's a big thick book that gives you a decent work out as you take it from the shelf and replace it. The book was designed as text book and has exercises. I pick it up from time to time and read a chapter or two just for fun. I dunno if I would teach from this book or even use it as a serious text book, but it's darned interesting read.

  98. One of my MATH PROFESSORS went through this... by Asprin · · Score: 2

    ...sort of... when he got out of the service. He decided he wanted to do something different (he was a Navy engineer, IIRC - he told us this story like 12 years ago when I was one of his students) and started going through his old books from school to figure out what he liked. Eventually, he found one on algebra (group theory) and picked a hard problem in the book he had never understood. Starting with page 1, he worked through everything in the book until he'd solved it - completely - by himself - working alone - with no timetables. When he finished, several months had passed and he was having the time of his life. He started taking formal classes at the University, and is now (was at the time) a full Professor at BGSU.

    I guess the point is that math still needs you if you still need math.

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  99. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's been in my bookmarks list for quite some time now.

  100. Three Sites to Start With by malibucreek · · Score: 3, Informative
    --

    Why is it called COMMON sense when so few people have it?

  101. Specialize! by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1
    Try reading a few hobby mathematics books first like "The Code Book" by Simon(?) Singh or any of the selection of books you find next to this one. Most of the bigger bookstores around here don't mind you having a good look, so read the first chapter before leaving the store and make sure it turns your crank.

    Hopefully after you get through a few books you'll have a better idea of what you want to focus on. Even if you do end up plonking down a few hundred bucks for a night course, at least you'll make better of it because it's covering the material you want to learn.

    On the other hand, you may find that there's enough recreatinoal mathematics books out there to sate that thirst for knowledge instead. This way means you may still spend $500 on books, but it's deferred over several years and at a pace you choose.

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
  102. Re:because mathematicians have a sense of humor to by genomancer · · Score: 1

    Laugh, Amen to the above... Zoren's Lemon and Abelian Grapes ;)

    What do you get if you cross an elephant and an Aardvark?




    Elephant.Ardvark.Sin(theta) of course.






    And, as a Biologist and Mathematician, my favorite:






    What do you get if you cross a Mosquito and a Mountain climber?







    You can't, one's a vector, the other a Scaler.
    Enjoy! (Both the jokes, and Mathematics in general.. a good proof is poetry for the logical mind)

  103. Springer Series 'Undergraduate Texts in Mathemath' by junge_m · · Score: 1

    I was in the same situation as you are now in 15 years ago when I started my electrical engineering course. I refreshed und extended my mathematical knowledge by use of the Springer Series UTM (Undergraduate Texts in Mathemathics). Nearly all of the volumes have a short but precises introduction to notation and background in the first couple of charpters.
    Of particular use were Marsden/Weinstein Calculus I/II/III as well as Lang's introductory book on Algebra.

    May your quest for knowledge be a happy one.

  104. typo correction for algebra software by js7a · · Score: 1
    Correction: Matlab is not an algebra package (however, if you buy it new, you can get it bundled with Maple for a small extra charge.)

    The actual computer algebra programs I recommend, in order, are: Maple, Mathematica, and Macsyma.

  105. Courses cost money, knowledge only dedication. by leereyno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I take it that you're interested in math itself, not necessaarily interested in pursuing a degree in math. Trying to learn most things through formal education is like trying to paint a barn with a brush that only has 10% of its bristles. You'll get it done eventually, but boy is it inefficient.

    One of the few advangates that formal education provides, at least in terms of learning, is the step-by-step programmed nature of it. If you're trying to learn something and you don't know how to approach it or what to study, then formal instruction can work. However when you know what it is you should be studying and learning, then formal schooling is usually a hinderance because you can learn things more quickly and more thoroughly on your own, assuming of course that you have some degree of discipline. The forced nature of formal education is its other advantage, and it is a dubious one at that.

    Formal education is geared towards the stupid and lazy. For someone who is intelligent and industrious it usually gets in the way more than anything else.

    Primary and secondary school spends twelve years teaching those of average intelligence what those whose IQ ranges in the top 10% can easily learn in six. I should know because when I was in sixth grade my "achievemnt" test scores were on par with most college students. My IQ is about 130, or in the top 10%. Of course my teachers all thought I was much brighter, but then they're not used to dealing with someone like me and are, by and large, not too far above the 50% percentile themselves.

    College courses are better in that the instructors aren't there to babysit anyone. Also anyone who is either stupid or lazy doesn't usually stick around for long. The pace of study and depth in which the subject is explored can vary greatly however. There have been courses I've had to work pretty hard at, of course those have almost always been the ones that were worth taking.

    But anyway, my point is don't spend money to take a course when independent discipline and effort will get you farther in your pursuit of knowledge. Spend money on courses only when they are required for some other purpose independent of learning, such as a job. Don't rely on them as your sole or even primary form of education. Rely on yourself and you'll always be ahead of curve.

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:Courses cost money, knowledge only dedication. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My IQ is about 130, or in the top 10%. Of
      > course my teachers all thought I was much
      > brighter

      You're lucky. Very, very lucky. Lots of kids on that side of the curve get the opposite treatment. Your inquisitive nature and aptitude often leads to being labeled as a troublemaker by teachers who are actually less intelligent than you.

      I suspected this in 3rd grade, really suspected it in high school, became an adult and eventually decided I was wrong, and today I realize I was right. If I could find my 3rd grade math teacher, I'd like give her a very harsh review. She did damage to me that I am still suffering from, and I don't care if she's 88 years old, she needs a good flogging.

    2. Re:Courses cost money, knowledge only dedication. by batessr · · Score: 1

      I would not knock formal education so quickly. Formal education provides one important resource that self education does not, an instructor. Instructors in formal education or mentors in informal education can allow someone to learn far more quickly than self education with discipline alone. I have always notice in learning everything from computer science to pinball, than people who learn with more experienced people to aid them always learn faster than those who do not have such aid.

    3. Re:Courses cost money, knowledge only dedication. by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      I know it's a day late, but I just have to respond to this. You have a point about the inefficiency of formal education, but you also miss somethings that reverse it: the introduction of concepts that you might otherwise not learn, and more important, the professor.
      Never ignore the usefulness of a good instructor to help you over hard parts, suggest additional resources, or point you in the right direction when you want to explore a concept in greater detail. This, and the ideas of other students, is why I enjoy grad school. Noone says you have to stop where the class stops, and most profs will happily help you if you want to learn more.

      Consider the formal education as the first step. The true journey is where you let that step take you.

    4. Re:Courses cost money, knowledge only dedication. by leereyno · · Score: 2

      What about the uselessness of a bad instructor? Or more importantly the detrimental nature of an environment that is not conducive to learning?

      Holding up your experiences as a graduate student as examples of formal education is like presenting a gourmet meal as an example of the average fare from McDonalds.

      Surely you must remember what it was like back in grade school and high school. For me it was largely a waste of time. My fellow students were not interested in learning anything, and the teachers spent much of their time babysitting. As a result the curriculum was dumbed down and the teachers themselves approached their craft from the viewpoint that they had to force it down your throat. I spent most of my school days trying not to get discouraged from learning by the very system tasked with assisting me to do so.

      The products of this system are people who see learning as something unpleasant and education itself as the responsibility of others. They don't take responsibility for their own education (although they may work hard and/or jump through hoops for good grades). When they have children of their own they don't take responsibility for their child's education either. One of the major complaints of teachers and administrators is that parents aren't involved in the education process. All I can say is that the system is reaping what it has sown.

      That is not to say that the educational systems in the US are all bad. In fact, compared to the rest of the world we are, as in most things, among the very best. The media and scaremongers used to like to tell us that the US is behind. The truth is that they're doing comparisons between average US students and the best and brightest the third world has to offer. They did this to scare the public and get more money for public education. Or at least that was the plan. Its largely backfired because what has happened instead is the parents who have the means have put their children into private schools and those that don't have demanded vouchers for private schools. That is why you don't hear so much about how the US is behind. Once again, they're reaping what they've sown.

      I personally plan to home school my children. I hope for the woman I marry to be at least as intelligent as I am, preferably more intelligent. Chances are our children will also be ahead of the curve. I'll not let them be held back other children who are not as bright. Socialization will of course be an issue, but I'll deal with that when I come to it.

      Lee

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    5. Re:Courses cost money, knowledge only dedication. by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      What about the uselessness of a bad instructor? Or more importantly the detrimental nature of an environment that is not conducive to learning?
      Holding up your experiences as a graduate student as examples of formal education is like presenting a gourmet meal as an example of the average fare from McDonalds.
      Surely you must remember what it was like back in grade school and high school. For me it was largely a waste of time. My fellow students were
      So are you saying that because I have good experiences as a grad student, it renders my perspective invalid? If so, that's ridiculous.

      If you have a bad instructor, then the class degrades to the point of teaching yourself, so you're really no worse off than the original poster's suggestion. If the entire environment is disruptive then I agree that learning will be very difficult. However, I question how widespread this really is.

      I do remember high school (grade school was too long ago). And I don't remember a single teacher who wasn't willing to help if I was interested in learning more. Not one! Granted, I rarely needed extra help or direction, but the few times I asked for it it was there. My perception of this (and it was verified by one of my teachers) is that they were bored for the most part and really wished students would show some interest. Considering that I went to a NYC public school in a pretty poor neighborhood, I doubt that I had particularly gifted teachers.

      In a nutshell, you get out of education what you put in. Teachers/professors are just one more resource. You or your parents are paying for them and trying to get your money's worth is just good sense. Considering the cost in time and money to go to college, I could never understand the students who just sat there quietly, not understanding a thing, but refusing to ask questions.

      I realize how inferior many of this country's high schools are. I came here from another country and entered high school in 10th grade and the classes were laughably easy compared to what I was used to -- and they were honors classes. But the quality of the school or teachers is secondary to student attitude. Unlike a lot of my classmates, I was brought up to believe that education was important and I tried to learn something whenever I could.
    6. Re:Courses cost money, knowledge only dedication. by leereyno · · Score: 2

      " So are you saying that because I have good experiences as a grad student, it renders my perspective invalid? If so, that's ridiculous."

      No, all I'm saying is that grad school isn't grade school. I didn't write about grad school, I wrote about the problems and issues that surround primary and secondary school education in America. If you'll recall my original post, I did say that college was better than high school.

      As for the rest of what you've said, I don't dispute it. I especially agree with the idea that you get out of your education what you put into it. This idea is not too far off from the point I was trying to make in the first place. If someone is intelligent and industrious, they are going to put a lot into their education, and likely receive a lot from it in return. My only point is that you are better off pursuing knowledge on your own instead of paying tuition. Graduate school is of course different. At that level there is value in the formal instruction. At lower levels the value is questionable. It is not valueless, just not the best bang for your buck, especially before you get to college. I'm pursuing a degree in (big suprise here) computer engineering. There are classes that I've taken that I could have easily taught. Then there are others that I really had to work at. I take all the classes because I'm pursuing a degree. If I were not pursuing a degree I'd concentrate on the areas I didn't already have mastery of.

      Nothing in what the original poster wrote suggested that he was interested in pursuing a degree in math, just that he had an interest in it. For him to pay money to take the entry level classes he mentioned would be a very enefficient use of time and effort. He'll get farther on his own in the same ammount of time because he won't be held back by the slow pace of the course. That is assuming that he is able to handle the material in the first place. If his abilities are marginal then private study augmented with the help of a good tutor would be the best way to go. If he does want to pursue a degree in math then of course he'll have to take the courses. If that is the case then he should do what I do, get the texts and syllibi of the courses he is going to be taking in the future and study them ahead of time. What else are summers for? Even if he doesn't gain a full understanding on his own he'll be so far ahead of the curve when he does take the class that it will be a walk in the park.

      Lee

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  106. .. sudden interest in mathematics by apankrat · · Score: 1
    Finally decided to go for a million ?

    Too late, John Nash is already halfway through ;-)

    --
    3.243F6A8885A308D313
  107. college for its own sake by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    Too many posts basically tell the OP not
    to go to college! There's no doubt some truth to that. The school part of the experience is not,
    as you may naievely surmise, to "be taught", rather to provide the opportunity to teach yourself (ostensibly with guidance and supervision), then be tested.

    The goal of the university experience is part education for its own sake, and part quest for a framable document! Myriad problems arise when an individual seeks one part without the others!

    My university catalog actually says you'll not be admitted if you have more than 15 hours without a degree plan. (I think that's pretty harsh).

    Community colleges don't do this, but once you get a degree from one, it's somewhat a waste of effort to keep studying there.

    I have a certain amount of contempt for the whole system, which was put there BY the system (been to 5 colleges!) So excuse my hostility today ;-)

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  108. Have you tried your local library? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found some video/workbook combos that cover covered basic math, algebra, geometry, calc and trig in great detail. The tapes seem to be geared for high school age or adult viewers, and are taught by instructors who were chosen for their knowledge and presentation skills.

    The Standard Deviants company covers various math topics on video or DVD.

    Or you could pick up one of the many Math education CD's at a local software store.

  109. all you need is zakon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    memorize this
    and you will be well on your way to proving the riemann conjecture...

  110. Don't forget the $$$ by glrotate · · Score: 1

    Remember the original query concerned low cost options, something most small colleges have no understanding of.

    Most large public universities have pitifull undergrad math programs because the classes are taught by foreign grad students.

  111. Get a library card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to the public library and sign out math textbooks. Then sit down, read, and solve the problems. Don't waste any money buying popsci math books "The Magic of Numbers". Trust me on this, it is the only way to go (and is much less expensive).

  112. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember one of my Chinese profs encouraged people to do that for the second semester.

    He was the school VP and didn't get paid to teach the class anyhow, so he didn't really care if we were paying for the class or not.

  113. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i did this with film classes. after the first lecture, go up to the professor and tell him exactly what you told us, and ask if he'd mind if you just sat in on his classes to learn. i've never had a professor say no to me, simply because they don't have to do more work, and are gaining a student who is guaranteed to be eager to learn what they're teaching.

  114. SparkNotes.com!!! by TheHouseMouse · · Score: 1

    May I reccomend Sparknotes.com. Their mainly known for their own online brand of Cliff's Notes, however their math sections are quite in depth. Plus, everything is free, however occasionaly you'll reach a page that will ask for you to sign up, which is also free. I'm really quite happy with their site. I'm a high school student who's quite unsastisfied with the average level math track that I downgraded to (i've learned pythagorean's theorum 4 times since 4th grade, whoopi!). IMHO, the full fledged text books at my library were quite boring and made little distinction as to whats important to learn...and the other 500 pages of in depth clauses and contradictions.

    --
    Only the meek get pinched. The bold survive.
  115. Excellent Advice! by MrResistor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ask [your daughters] to teach you.

    This is the best advice so far, because it will help you and your daughters. One of the things I learned while I was a math tutor was that I didn't know dick about math until I started tutoring. Sure, I had made it to Calculus, and I could keep up at that level, but I didn't know math. It has been said that the best way to really learn something is to try and tech it to someone else, and I've found that it really is true.

    Having your daughters teach you the math they're studying will help you relearn the things you've forgotten (or maybe even teach you new things, depending on where they are at), but it will help them even more through the increased understanding they will gain by trying to teach these concepts to someone else, and perhaps as your memory is refreshed you can teach them concepts that don't seem to be presented to them otherwise (the way Kramer's Rule is presented currently is a prime example of this. It is more much more difficult to understand the mechanics of it with the current method, even though (or maybe because) it is more consistent with matrix mechanics).

    A better understanding of math can only open more and better opportunities to them, which is a noble pursuit for any parent. Also, the time spent will help strengthen the bonds between you.

    So, don't steal their books, ask them to teach you. This is by far the most beneficial solution for all involved.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Excellent Advice! by MxTxL · · Score: 2

      When i was a wee-little kid... like in elementary school, my dad would always come up to me and ask me to teach him math. He made it out like he didn't know anything about math and that i was showing him how it worked. Well, it turns out that he knew exactly how to do everything, he was just helping me study by making me teach it.

      When i got to college and was taking calculus, dif eq and discrete math, I would show my dad the stuff i was learning and now that he actually didn't understand any of it, he wasn't so interested in me teaching him anymore. Sort of a student out does the master kind of thing... :)

    2. Re:Excellent Advice! by Fjord · · Score: 2

      This is somthing I considered doing when I have shrubs. When I was a kid, my (older) brother got me to do his math homework and ever since then I always had a leg up on math. I kind of want to simulate that with my kid(s) without getting an older one to pawn off homework (he, incidentally, became dyslexic with numbers and had to go to sylvan learning school to help correct it).

      --
      -no broken link
    3. Re:Excellent Advice! by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to be pedantic, but can someone "become" dyslexic? I always, perhaps incorrectly, thought this was something someone just always has problems with which may not be diagnosed for a while (usually after schooling issues and whatnot).

      It would be pretty sucky to not have issues with dyslexia and then develop them in adulthood or somesuch. Probably suckier than just being dyslexic your whole life.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    4. Re:Excellent Advice! by Fjord · · Score: 1

      yeah, you are right. I didn't really use the right word there. He was diagnosed with it. Maybe in err, there was a feeling that he didn't develop an understanding of numbers because I was doing his homework, but it could have easily been the opposite (he didn't have an understanding of numbers so he got me to do it).

      My understanding is that a stroke or other brain traume can have you become dyslexic. It would probably suck, but strokes are rarely fun.

      --
      -no broken link
    5. Re:Excellent Advice! by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      I was just wondering if you can "become" dyslexic.

      I always thought people either were or were not diabetic, but, apparently excessive weight/poor diet/lack of exercise can lead to the body regulating itself in a diabetic way.

      That was a shock to me.

      I'm fully prepared to learn that someone can read numbers in order until they become 30 at which point numbers flip-flop on them. But, once again, that does not appear to be the case.

      Thanks for responding. I'll stick with what I think I know for now.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  116. Re:Re-learning Beware Bad Text Books by Prof_Dagoski · · Score: 2


    I throw out a little caution here. Not too long ago I was helping a roomate through a remedial math class he was taking at community college. The text books were horrible. Without me, the poor guy would never have gotten the idea of negative numbers. I'd look for a good alternate text book. Still, this approach is a very good idea.

  117. OOH I Know! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's one of those cool toys where the car changes into a robot, right? right???

  118. Online & Free by Keighvin · · Score: 1

    Try http://free-ed.net/

    They have courses in several departments; their core mathematics include:

    Arithmetic & Pre-Algebra
    Algebra
    Trigonometry
    Geometry
    Calc ulus

    It might not be everything, but it'll be at least the primer you're looking for. All material is freely available, though some of the sites they reference do require you to registerfor access. So it's a free lunch if you tell them your name.

    --
    Any spoon would be too big.
  119. Engineering Math by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

    I'm in a similar situation as you, except that I was never good at math in the first place.


    A colleague highly recommended a book called 'Engineering Mathematics' by Kenneth Stroud--I bought it, and have started going through it. It looks pretty comprehensive, and seems to be a good kick-start for re-learning everything from basic algebra on upwards which usually put me to sleep during high school and college.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  120. ISBN: 0124454607 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on your level, check out: "Discovering Higher Mathematics: Four Habits of Highly Effective Mathematicians"
    It is accessible by people of many skill levels.

  121. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found myself in a similar situation about a year and a half back. I bought a couple of books from Amazon and was refreshing my math skills in preparation for completing a CS degree. But the more I studied math, the more interesting it became and I decided to pursue a math degree instead.

    I found that studying out of a book or two didn't quite work for me. I needed the classroom environment where I could ask questions and talk to other students.

    I met with an undergrad advisor at a local university and he suggested that I retake some courses at one of the local community colleges and then transfer to the university. This was also quite good for my GPA since I am doing much better the second time around. I am more interested in learning the material than just getting through class. I also found that about half of the class was my age (33yo) or older.

    One thing of which you should be aware: some of the classes that are required for the degree are only offered during the day. I'm lucky in that my employer is willing to work with me on that issue.

    Best of luck to you!

  122. Community colleges by techstar25 · · Score: 2

    CCs are designed for adults returning to college. You might find that most CC profs are your age and so they will be easy to talk to and learn from.

  123. Re:because mathematicians have a sense of humor to by sakusha · · Score: 2

    Not funny. Here's funny:

    Did you hear about the constipated mathematician? He worked it out with a pencil.

  124. a reason to consider colege courses by Laplace · · Score: 2, Informative

    Graduate school. Take these classes at a community college:

    1) Algebra
    2) Trigonometry
    3) Calculus
    4) Differential Equations
    5) Linear Algebra
    6) Prob/Stat
    7) Abstract Algebra
    8) Numerical Methods/Analysis

    Then send your applications for grad school off. If you pass those seven classes you will be a shoe in.

    --
    The middle mind speaks!
    1. Re:a reason to consider colege courses by sqlgeek · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry to say that this would at best constitute a minor in mathematics. As first-year graduate work a student should be ready for serious coursework in:


      Real/Complex Analysis (Rudin, for example)


      Topology (Munkres)


      Algebra (Herstein)


      From the pre-requisites to these books (no need to buy them, just flip through the first few pages) you should get a realistic feel for your preparedness for a graduate program.

      Have fun,
      Scott

    2. Re:a reason to consider colege courses by sqlgeek · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry to say that this would at best constitute a minor in mathematics. As first-year graduate work a student should be ready for serious coursework in:

      Real/Complex Analysis (Rudin, for example)

      Topology (Munkres)

      Algebra (Herstein)

      From the pre-requisites to these books (no need to buy them, just flip through the first few pages) you should get a realistic feel for your preparedness for a graduate program.

      Have fun,
      Scott

    3. Re:a reason to consider colege courses by Laplace · · Score: 2

      As a guy with a Masters in Mathematics, I'm sorry to say that you're full of shit.

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    4. Re:a reason to consider colege courses by Anonymous+Commando · · Score: 1
      ...If you pass those seven classes...

      Check the list again, my friend - you listed eight classes. Rather ironic, considering the topic here is advanced math...

      ...or have I (and a moderator or two) just been trolled? :=]

      --
      Corporate Jenga: You take a blockhead from the bottom and you put him on top...
    5. Re:a reason to consider colege courses by Hideyoshi · · Score: 1

      What a load of bunkum!

      Don't expect to get into any graduate mathematics program without additional courses in real analysis, complex analysis and basic topology. As for numerical methods and differential equations - those are only really essential if you want to be an applied mathematician or a physicist.

  125. Maths and Sauce... by mccalli · · Score: 2
    My girlfriend was returning to education thirteen years after leaving school early with nothing. She was petrified of algebra - a completely irrational fear. If I explained a problem in terms of 'find the missing number', she'd do it. If I then rewrote it such that the missing number was represented by 'x', then she'd freeze and not go near it.

    So, one night whilst out for a drink I grabbed the little packets of sauce that were on the table. I laid down three packets of tomato sauce and said that these three packets could be represented by a single packet of tartare. Then I put down two packets of tartare and asked how many packets of tomato sauce that represented.

    That was her first exercise in symbolic representation for about thirteen years. She passed it, and has gone on to take access courses before studying for four years to be a dispensing optician. She's now done her finals, involving such things as ray tracing and equations of quite ridiculous lengths that usually had to be re-arranged and substituted into other equations. We're waiting to hear the results, though she's passed everything else so far.

    So there you go. My small contribution to the world of teaching - applied mathematics using packets of sauce in a pub. Not the most conventional maths lesson of all time, but it worked.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  126. Your teacher's name wan't Masey was it? by N8F8 · · Score: 2

    Your teacher's name wan't Masey was it? I may have the name spelled wrong, but this is identical to a guy I knew in the Navy who decided he wanted to teach math. We were Nuclear Machinist's Mates on the USS Enterprise at the time.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Your teacher's name wan't Masey was it? by Asprin · · Score: 2

      Sorry, my prof was named Weber - Wally Weber.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
  127. Get Mathematica...or something similar by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Computers have made it much easier to experiment with mathematical ideas, and experimenting helps you learn better. I'd suggest buying a copy of Mathematica and one of the companion books. It will do you more good than college courses until you're back in the swing of things.

    For the more adventuresome, I'd try J from JSoftware. It's terser, and more intellectually challenging, but it's free and also has advantages over Mathematica in some respects. Ken Iverson has some on-line papers that make a good companion (one of which comes with the J distribution).

    1. Re:Get Mathematica...or something similar by pamri · · Score: 1

      Gmat powerprep software, freely available at Gmat.com(reg required,etc). It's a good beginning & the one advantage is it has most of the highschool math content in single package.

    2. Re:Get Mathematica...or something similar by alumshubby · · Score: 2

      Well, there is a free version of it, but the actual suite is US$895, which is a little pricey for the average individual. The free version isn't the same thing as the pro version:

      J systems are available for download on a number of platforms. It may be used and redistributed freely. There is a fee for a professional key (prokey) that enables features required for commercial development of large systems. See Help|Product and Ordering Information for prices and order form.

      One dodge would be to take ONE class at the local community college and, while enrolled, buy a student edition of Mathematica for around US$140 or so -- roughly one-tenth the price of the identical thing in the "professional" version. I'm looking at buying Mathematica this fall even though I won't strictly need it for school.

      --
      "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    3. Re:Get Mathematica...or something similar by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      Well, there is a free version of it, but the actual suite is US$895, which is a little pricey for the average individual. The free version isn't the same thing as the pro version:

      You've never used J, have you? You only get a couple of extra features with the prokey, and they only really matter if you're distributing large software packages for re-release. That's it. There are no other differences. JSoftware even says you don't even need the prokey for commercial use of J. It's the most liberal license I've ever seen.

  128. Courses are overrated, try books and newsgroups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    College courses cost too much to be worthwhile, IMHO, if you don't want a degree.

    Get some good textbooks on specific subjects (find out what the school system or local college recommends, to start). Get some problem books with worked solutions to go along with them (e.g., Schaum's Outlines). However, working alone can only get you so far. When you have questions, try some of the Usenet newsgroups, like sci.math or k12.ed.math.

  129. Just jump right in by mondoterrifico · · Score: 0

    I had to take university math after 10 years of inactivity. The best thing to do is just jump right into your subject. If you are taking Calculus start doing Calculus. Don't fuck around, just do Calculus problems. When your learning algebra, just take the text and do lots of Algebra problems.
    My point is i found i didnt need any refresher courses to learn Calculus, algebra, differential equations etc, I just had to sit and plug my way through the textbooks for each subject.

  130. Re:Mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, I get it now. That is pretty damn funny. Thanks, sllort.

  131. Too Late by ThePlague · · Score: 0

    Since you state that you haven't done it since your first year of university (~18), and since that has been nearly 10 years ago (assume 9), it follows that you are now 27 y.o. That's far too old to learn math fundamentals like calculus, differential equations or complex analysis. Thanks for asking.

  132. Try the Math Brain by KI0PX · · Score: 1

    My university has a site to help students review the math they may have forgotten. It's called Braintrax[braintrax.umr.edu], it's an excellent visually-oriented math review. Even if you aren't interested in the math, the java applet is very cool.

  133. Re:Mathematics by UncleFluffy · · Score: 2

    One option is community college

    Yup, that's exactly what I'm doing. I've been feeling the same way as the article submitter for a while now, and finally got off my ass and did something about it. Just applied for a mathematics course at my local community college.

    The nice thing is that it lets me get a second degree at my own pace whilst still working. Either I can just take the courses at the CC, "cash in" the credits and come out with an AA degree, or can transfer the credits over and finish up at a "full" university to get a BA, still part-time.

    Good luck, whatever you choose.

    --

    What would Lemmy do?

  134. Thanks... by Aknaton · · Score: 1

    to Cliff for asking this question and those who are seriously answering. I am starting to learn to program in C in my spare time and if it is one thing I could use, it is a better understanding of math.

    Of course, I am worse off then Cliff is, as I never even reached Algebra in High School.

  135. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. (OT) by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    I'm going to take this wildly off topic, because something flashed inside my brain.

    ----

    I'm waiting for the anti-piracy posters to flame all over your post - your stealing your proffessors IP! How can he make a living - you're one less might-be student to extort! ;)

    This is tongue and cheek of course, but hey, those 'then everyone will steal the CD, theyll just go without the paper CD insert' people should be chiming in 'then nobdy will pay for school, theyll just go without the tests' any minute now, right?

    Okay, I gather the next thing someone might say is that a school gives you official accredation. A piece of paper that means, "We think that this person knows their stuff, so we vouch for them." So, a diploma is, in many ways, a brand. Its not just that you completed your courses, its that that school says you're as capable as the other folks they've turned out, which employers presumably have some sort of track record with.

    Now, with CDs, the 'brand' is the official gear. The official CD. The official 'making of' CD. Its a diploma, from the school of "I'm a fan of so-and-so".

    Anyhow, I've long since felt that people don't buy music/art/culture because they want the cold hard media - they want to get the 'diploma' .. the official recognition and accredation as their stats, whether they be a history grad or an official fan. Your suggestion is the corollary but demonstrates an exciting point - its clearly benificial to society in this case to let you sit in on class, since there will never be a shortage of paying folks there for the 'official gear' to support the industry financially. Any 'run-off' like sitting in or copying a CD is simply a bonus - free info back to the people, free advertising for the content creator, and everyone saves on card scanners, security gaurds, and DRM OSes!

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  136. It all depends on the application by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    A local community college is your best bet. You can pay for classes "a la carte".

    Here's a good starting point:

    You need algebra to start....without algebra you can't do anything. After that:

    Calculus I & Calculus II: Integration and differentiation.

    Statistics: Very important...means, medians, confidence intervals...etc.

    Like computer science? Take discrete math. This is extremely important if you want to understand the "digital" world, and the foundations of logic...truth tables etc.

    That should be plenty to keep you busy. Calc III and differential equations are really hard-core engineering maths. I was an EE major before switching to CS...let's just say that Diff EQs, helped me make the switch.

    Have fun and good luck!

    -ted

    1. Re:It all depends on the application by joshki · · Score: 1

      You missed one -- if they offer Pre-calculus, take it before you take calculus. It will save you a LOT of headaches. Basically, algebra will not prepare you for calculus -- you need a much stronger foundation is trig to understand the concepts in calculus.

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
    2. Re:It all depends on the application by ajmarks · · Score: 0

      Don't forget higher (real) algebra, dynamical systems, PDEs (preferably in several complex variables), combinatorics, number theory, and logic.

      --
      Opinions are not Informative, though they may be Insightful or Interesting.
    3. Re:It all depends on the application by zerofoo · · Score: 2

      I guess I just assumed he got trig out of the way.

      You are correct. Without an understanding of the simplest sine functions, calculus becomes very difficult.

      -ted

    4. Re:It all depends on the application by xtal · · Score: 2

      > I was an EE major before switching to CS...let's just say that Diff EQs, helped me make the switch.

      Arrgh. I don't like this. I have a EE degree. I used to think math was hard, until one day, I thought of something very obvious I had completely missed: What do those equations mean? I had spent the better part of my life at the time playing with equations without really understanding what anything actually meant. Once I started to visualize WHAT the equation was trying to tell me (que mathematica, maple, matlab), things started to get exponentially (ha-ha) easier.

      Most of the time people who I have tutored or talked to and helped through engineering (or helped me!) hit on one of the following as a fundamental problem which causes difficulty down the road (or right away, depending on how determined you are).

      The big one. Inability to really come up with an answer to "what is math". What do those equations mean? What does their picture (set) look like? What is that differential equation trying to describe to me? What does that field gradient tell me?

      Second, is crummy algebra skills. You need to know VERY LITTLE algebra to get concepts. You also need to know VERY LITTLE trig. What is important is that your really, really, understand what those little pieces you know mean. Then, simplify! Most of engineering is based around very simple cases, and you can certainly have rough approximations of even complex systems without needing a table of trignometric identities. This stops a lot of students cold, especially people who hate rote memorization.

      You can get a pretty good picture of what calculus really means with x, x^2, and maybe e^x and sin. Really complicated things get approximated and simulated in a computer (in the real world). It's important that -what the math means- is conveyed.

      Maybe that will help someone, or maybe I'm just tired, but -math is not difficult-. It is just taught in a miserable forum in most schools because the people teaching it don't understand either. And I still hate my grade school teachers for making ANY kid do 200 simple addition problems. :-)

      --
      ..don't panic
    5. Re:It all depends on the application by zerofoo · · Score: 2

      OK, it wasn't diff eq's completely that made me go to computer science. In high school, I really enjoyed my pascal programming class, and my AP computer science class (data structures). I made the mistake of listening to my guidance counselor and went into EE. I got through three years of it, and almost graduated...but one day in one of my circuits classes, I was doing nodal analysis on a circuit the size of a cafeteria table and I decided that I had enough. I decided that I liked algorithms and writing code better.

      I don't regret the EE background. It helped me make a really cool 110 AC switchbox that was switchable from the web for my senior project. The faculty was impressed that I actually knew how to build the hardware (as well as write the software). Unfortunately, some of the people that I presented the project to had no idea what an optically isolated transistor is, or how to build a power supply. Regardless of that, I did get an "A" on that project.

      -ted

  137. Which is more expensive, time or money? by robkill · · Score: 1

    If you need to get up to speed quickly, then, as many have said, find a community college and take a course. Unless you are extremely dedicated, you will get up to speed quicker with a course than just learning on your own from a book.

    If you are doing this out of a love of Mathematics, and want to do it on the cheap, go to eBay or the like for textbooks. You can always check with professors at the local community college or University for books they recommend, or even go to the college bookstore and look for used textbooks. Another option is to find someone who tutors college students, and explain what you are trying to do. When you run into stumbling blocks, pay the tutor for an hour or two of time to help you out when you need it.

    --
    DMCA - Chilling free speech since 1998.
  138. start with stuff you want to know. by skidrash · · Score: 1

    Cryptography, 'math magic', chaos theory, whatever.... as you come to stuff you don't understand, study that in enough detail to undertand our main-interest item.

    That'll keep you motivated when the stuff gets way too boring.

    On the down side, in the end you won't get a sheepskin AND you won't have what others consider a 'well rounded', and your mathematical education will not conform to a 'well grounded pegagogy'. Whatever TF that means. Your knowledge will also have not been rigorously tested.... lots of cons.

    Another approach, see which universities have put up their syllabi and follow that.

  139. I agree by N8F8 · · Score: 2

    This was also my experience also. When I took advanced calculus in college the professor repeatedly asked me to change majors (I was getting straight As). When she asked the reason why, I put it as best I could. I said I had no problems remembering formulas but there was some part of calculus I wasn't quite understanding. Kind of like seeing seeing a part of a picture and almost being to the point of guessing what the rest of the picture was but not getting anywhere. Very flustrating. She couldn't help me either because she had simply memorized the formulas and gone on.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  140. 3 words ... by Lug+Monkeybird · · Score: 1
  141. Calculus Course in the back of SciAm? by F34nor · · Score: 1

    Scientific American 2 months ago had a Calc. course advertised for ~50.00 I think it was the spintronics issue. Anyone tried this? I looked pretty good from the ad.

  142. Get a book AND a consultant by RackinFrackin · · Score: 1

    Teaching yourself from a math book can work well, but I think that it is also important to have a knowlegable person you can consult. The problem with teaching yourself in isolation is that when you get stuck, you don't have anyone to pull you out. The teach-yourself-calculus-type books try to minimize this kind of thing, but chances are it will still happen.

    If you have any friends who are math geeks, they'd probably be glad to answer questions and talk math with you. If you don't have any math-geek friends, then perhaps you could talk with your daughter's teacher, or hire a tutor, although tutors can be pricey.

  143. Check out the Standard Deviants by strat · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you have access to the PBS-U channel on TV or can find the tapes, you might want to check out a group called "Standard Deviants" and their eponymous show.

    It's basically high school curricula, at several levels, but they have a way of making some pretty dry material memorable. I was really surprised at what I retained after watching a few of their shows on physics and math. (They teach all kinds of subject matter.)

    The girls are frequently cute too.

  144. Buy some texts... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ... and start reading them. Do the problems. It is that simple.

    Auditing (or actually taking) classes will help alot.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  145. The CurveBank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a website I once did some work http://curvebank.calstatela.edu/
    There is also some interesting Java and JavaScript tools to play with. Also, contributions are welcomed.

  146. Try this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at PSU so I'll give it a plug here. Don't know about the quality of these courses because I haven't taken any through this yet...

    http://www.worldcampus.psu.edu/pub/index.shtml

    and for course info...
    http://www.worldcampus.psu.edu/search/ind ex.shtml

    If your serious about this check it out. I hope this helps you.

    --Paul

  147. Another good book by kmillar · · Score: 1

    My wife was in a similar position -- she couldn't remember anything beyond basic algebra from high school, and didn't have the time for classes. She ended up getting a copy of "Practical Algebra: A Self-Teaching Guide" be Shelby and Slavin, and learning from that in what spare time she did have. She enjoyed learning from the book, and now understands algebra very well indeed.

    This is easily the best math textbook to learn from that I've come across. The explanations are consistently clear, accessable (my wife almost never had to get me to explain things) and concise. At the same time, this is not a dumbed-down book. The content is simply excellent, and is well presented.

  148. Homeschool your kids by jafac · · Score: 2

    If you're reasonably intelligent, you'll learn the subject as you teach. I've been doing this as sort of a refresher course in Spanish. When their maths level gets to the point where it would start to challenge me, that's when I intend to take over. The learning materials I buy for them will help me as well. :)

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  149. Applied Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    First of all, this is a sick request from where I stand! I say this mostly because I am a 4th year graduate student in an APPLIED MATH program who really truly hates MATH. I guess I mean to say that I hate MATH for MATH's sake. People who have suggested that you get involved in community college classes are dead on accurate if you want "formal training" (these courses tend to be "laid back" and "fun" if you're there with the attitude that you want to be there and not some begrudging 20-something business or nursing student who is there because it's required). I recommend this path. To be sure, you'll find yourself enjoying this little hobby more if you've got a nice foundation of the principles (say some univariate and multivariate calculus, a little bit of ordinary and partial differential equations, and linear algebra, the latter you will fall in love with).

    All of this being said, a bigger point remains: SCREW MATH BOOKS! They are references and references ONLY. You're never going to learn much unless you go and get your hands dirty with what you're learning. In so far as books and community colleges are concerned, this means homework/quizzes/tests, the academic answer to "exercises". However, this sucks all of the life out of math and explains why I was originally despised/feared math, routinely failed math classes, and was headed to graduate school as a music composition student and not a MATH guy. However, one day (probably much like you), I realized that math in its application was an uber-powerful language. If it is not true that much of the world performs itself in the language of mathematics, it is at least true that much of what the world performs can be understood by describing it in the language of mathematics. We do it all the time, and this is kind of why we made up the language in the first place. This observation motivates my final endorsement: don't simply study math because it's cool. Find a field that you're interested in like weather prediction, fluid flow, predator-prey relationships, economics, investing, astronomy, etc. and study the math in the context of that interest. I think that you'll find the pursuit more organic and rewarding. For example, it is one thing to solve an ordinary differential equation in a homework exercise, but it is quite another to then use your solution to reveal how species populations destabilize when ecologies are destroyed, be able to predict if it will rain tomorrow at your house, or retire on the merit of your stock portfolio that you based around a simple differential model (good luck with that one!) Applied math explorations like this are available to tenured professors all the way down to high school students, and you can slide up the scale as you become more mathematically sophisticated.

    P.S. Once again SCREW MATH BOOKS. What you really need is software like Maple or Mathematica or whatever would be useful to you. After you get to the point where you could push through any computation with pencil and paper if the power went out and you absolutely had to, it is better to unload some of the "tougher" computations onto a computer so that you can enjoy more of the forest and less of the trees. Enjoy!!

    1. Re:Applied Math by WetCat · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I want to change this slogan to SCREW BAD MATH BOOKS. Unfortunately, it's about 75% of all math books. People who know math enough to write a book do not know a lot in pedagogic. So they wrote unreadable books.
      The only way to get good books is by peer review by other students; this is what university good for.
      So try to find book ratings.
      And do not forget math portals
      http://mathworld.com is a good point.

  150. http://mathworld.wolfram.com by bdrexler · · Score: 1

    http://mathworld.wolfram.com It's free and it has everything I've ever needed to look up. Beats digging out the old Trig Books :-)

    --


    "Excuses are like asses, everyone has one and they all stink." - Adam Corrola
    1. Re:http://mathworld.wolfram.com by ajmarks · · Score: 0

      The problem with mathworld is that you really need to know what you're looking for to use it. Also, it really helps to know the notation. That said, I'm a math major who uses mathworld at least twice a day; it is a truly excellent resource.

      --
      Opinions are not Informative, though they may be Insightful or Interesting.
  151. Re:Re-learning Beware Bad Text Books by bwalling · · Score: 2

    Not too long ago I was helping a roomate through a remedial math class he was taking at community college. The text books were horrible. Without me, the poor guy would never have gotten the idea of negative numbers.

    They let him out of high school? Holy crap!

  152. First community college, then textbooks by howlingfrog · · Score: 1

    The best way to learn math is in a classroom with an instructor who lectures a little and expects student participation a lot. But since you can't be a full-time student, you'll have to make do without it for the most part. I strongly reccommend against striking out on your own until you've taken the full calculus sequence, though. Whether you need to start at the beginning or not is at your discretion, but take actual courses with an actual teacher up through multivariable calc, which will be the third semester or fourth/fifth quarter.

    Whether or not it's useful to put undergraduates through a course in proof-writing before jumping into advanced courses is subject to a lot of debate (my position is that it is useful but not essential). But in your case, since you won't have feedback from a professor when you're trying to learn the advanced stuff, it's an absolute necessity. If possible, take a course like that from a local college or university. If you can't, I reccommend a textbook called Chapter Zero by Carol Schumacher. Carol was my academic adviser at Kenyon College, and I took a class from her based on that book. You won't learn a lot of math from it, but you'll learn what math is, and you'll learn how to learn math.

    After that, go to mathworld.wolfram.com and look around. It's a great resource for learning stuff, and even better for finding topics you want to explore further. Find something that sounds interesting and that you can basically understand the description of. A lot of colleges and universities have course catalogs available online--find some schools teaching an undergraduate class on the topic you picked, then look for the most common textbook. Buy it. Read it, working through problem sets, until you get tired of it. Go back to mathworld and repeat.

    --
    The original Howling Frog is a fictional character and has no UID.
  153. Teaching Company calculus videos are excellent by Helevius · · Score: 2, Informative
    I highly recommend this set of videos from the Teaching Company:

    Change and Motion: Calculus Made Clear. Prof. Starbird is an exceptional instructor who illustrates insights into calculus using layman's terms. I took three calculus related courses during the course of high school and college, yet found these six tapes to be incredibly enlightening.

    Be sure to buy them when they're on sale! They're $54.95 today (2 Jul 02) but retail for as high as $199.95, I believe.

    Enjoy,

    Helevius

  154. Negative Numbers? by Jordy · · Score: 2

    Surely you mean imaginary and not negative numbers. I can't imagine someone completing high school without knowing what negative numbers are.

    I know public schools are bad, but they aren't that bad, are they?

    --
    The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
    1. Re:Negative Numbers? by Fjord · · Score: 1

      note: this was a remedial class as a community college. His story checks out.

      --
      -no broken link
  155. Some really good advice here by mochan_s · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. You say you have developed an interest in math. Does that mean you like the idea of yourself knowing a lot of math or you are interested in a field that you want to know more of.

    2. If it is the first one, then pay lots of money to learn lots of math that you will never use and halfway thru give up. At least you won't have regrets.

    3. If it's the other one, then you know what fields of mathematics that you need to study in order to further understand the subject that you are interested in. Find the things that don't make sense or topics that don't make sense and make a list of subjects that you need to learn. You can go the local university library and read some of the books there which will lead you to other question and so on. That will be the true fun way of doing it.

  156. community college and books by fermion · · Score: 1
    Most of community colleges have night classes for new students. These courses are, from my experience in them, not university level, but they are a good introduction. These classes will give you time to think about why you want to math, and what is reasonable to do with it. If you wish to continue, most Universities have a limited number of higher level math night classes. I would not enroll in technical school classes, as those are more geared to getting a piece of paper.

    Books are also useful, but you don't get the feedback and support of other students. You also lose the motivation of the professor. Math is hard, and most of us need all the help we can get.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  157. Good Visual Tutorial Here by ruby31sar · · Score: 1

    we had to brush up on our calculus for some biological trend analysis. Check out this link.

    http://archives.math.utk.edu/visual.calculus/

  158. Stealth Studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, you know, going back to college is kind of a hassle, even if you go the community college route. There is a more subversive, sneaky way to get the same effect, and here it is:

    1. Go to your local college and get a copy of their student handbook (the one with the course listings, not the smaller practical app book). Look up the courses used in a mathematics curriculum, and look over the math department's suggested curriculum.

    2) Wait until the first week of classes, and walk into the bookstore, buying the texts for whichever semester you're currently "doing". Then amscray.

    3) Repeat until you've completed the reading for an entire undergrad degree.

    This approach is far better than relying on Borders or Barnes and Noble to help you out. They usually don't have the good stuff. And, this way your readings are being led by a prof. Sometimes, you'll be able to scam actual supplemental notes!

    If you really have balls of iron, you can just sneak into the back of the class and catch the lectures. Just make sure you ditch the first day so you don't get sucked into that "My name is foo and I'm studying bar" routine. But, this is risky. I'd just go for the books, personally.

    And, anyway, the college doesn't care if you buy their books. They're all about profit anyway.

    Just an idea...

  159. just sit in a class by AssFace · · Score: 1

    if you don't care about getting the paper that says you took the class, then just go and sit in on a class. all of the college classes that I have been in, none (aside from the first day) took attendance and as long as it was large enough and had space, you wouldn't be noticed.

    I have the luxury of living near both Harvard and MIT, but I don't have the luxury of the time to go to the classes since I work all day.
    otherwise, I would be all over it.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  160. The question is what do you want.... by wisemat · · Score: 1

    If you are looking at this as something to enhance your career, or help start a new career, then you need it on your transcript, and getting into a course will be worth it, even if you have to pay out the nose.

    If this is a hobby, then I suggest you avoid the college. A lot of people learn better by themselves, but more importantly, you play with the things you want to play with. Colleges hand you curriculums and expect you to pass tests over what they consider important, etc.

    On your own, you can study bizarre things that few colleges touch(and won't touch at an undergrad level) not because they are hard, but because they are nontraditional. Surreal numbers are fascinating and not hard at all with a solid high school background, but I've never seen a formal college course use them much less teach them. Fractals and Chaos theory are slowly becoming mainstream, but right now they are hard to find, and while you won't master them without a strong grasp of a lot of calculus and number theory, you can get your feet wet with them in high school(I did....) Game theory is the same way.

    And if you don't know what type of math you are interested in, pick up some of Martin Gardner's Mathematical Recreations books(he has a whole series.) They generally are written at the college freshmen level and they touch on a lot of bizarre and interesting types of math that most colleges don't formally deal with, and they are targeted at people doing this recreationally.....

  161. Blending in by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Funny

    2) If you don't have grey hairs, you can probably pass for a student with a little creative wardrobe work.

    Here's some pointers on blending in:

    • Nothing fancier than a t-shirt. Best if it's ripped or in really bad condition.
    • Pierce something. Anything.
    • Insert "like" several times in each sentence. Every sentence ends with "y'know".
    • Refer to men as "dudes" and women as "babes".
    • If the prof says something insightful, a loud "Whoa!" in in order.

    GMD

    1. Re:Blending in by MicroBerto · · Score: 2
      * Nothing fancier than a t-shirt. Best if it's ripped or in really bad condition.

      Pizza and beer stains!

      --
      Berto
    2. Re:Blending in by Kris+Thalamus · · Score: 1

      I suspect that someone who has the ability to warp time and sign up for classes in 1980's California will have very little need for remedial math. Following the above posters advice for fitting in will only elicit questions about whether that creepy old guy is trying to imitate Bill, Ted, or Polly Shore. At best it could evoke sympathy or pity for the hopelessly out of touch.

  162. study guides by austad · · Score: 2

    I've found that Schaum's study guides are great for learning mathematics on your own. Clear concise descriptions of how and why things work, and lots of sample problems. Oh, and do the problems man, do them all. You won't get good at math without lots and lots of problem solving experience.

    Another great tool is Mathematica. It will do the problems for you, which you don't want to make a habit of. But, when you're stuck, it really helps out, and it will show you all the work. Mathematica helped me through many high-level math courses, but it's pretty spendy. If your daughter is in college, she can probably get you the student version for around $100 or so. I worked in the Mathematics department at a large university, so I had the full version to use for free since it was installed on all of their machines. It runs on Windows, Linux, and Mac OSX.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  163. A math major who misses math by dlakelan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was an undergraduate math major (graduated 5 years ago). I was excellent at it, but unfortunately in the "real world" there is little opportunity to use abstract mathematics.

    So of course it's easy to miss out on doing math unless you have the time and patience for doing it in your "spare time". Even then, there are certain hurdles that I'd like to overcome. Perhaps some of you can help.

    I can also confidently say that it is nearly impossible to really learn advanced math (beyond 3rd year undergraduate) from books alone. The major problem is that math is a very highly compressed field. The notation is usually different from book to book, and the notation is extremely terse. There is rarely any reasonable prose describing why or what motivated a step along the way. Combine this with difficult ideas, and you find that having someone who can help explain why and how to go forward is infinitely more helpful than going alone.

    with beginning undergraduate topics like calculus or differential equations, you have comparatively expansive textbooks to describe what and why and how the math was developed along with how it works. It's also usually very applied mathematics. There are plenty of example "real world" problems where you can see how they work. Try that with n-sphere packing or coding theory and it just doesn't work.

    However getting access to teachers for advanced courses (beyond 2nd year undergrad) is usually very hard. First, they aren't taught except at universities, (even the small colleges rarely have more than 3 or 4 courses for post 3rd year undergrad) then second they have 1 section and sometimes only tought every other year or every 3rd semester or whatever.

    So it's actually hard to even find a place and time to do things like knot theory, algebraic topology, or complex variable analysis.

    Has anyone else who has an undergraduate math major been able to go on to do more math other than as a graduate student? I'd love to hear some suggestions as to how to do it.

    I was going to take a number theory course at UC berkeley summer session, but it was too much time commitment (commute to berkeley and back, plus 2 hrs lecture 4 times a week)

    Has anyone been successful at finding a mentor outside of these channels?

    thanks if you can help

    --
    ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
  164. If it's for work, help your peers. by twitter · · Score: 2
    Math is beautiful. Studdied for itself, without pressure, it can be both diverting and practical. Geometric proofs are very satisfying and set the stage for more thought.

    If I were you, I'd tutor my daughter first. See if you can keep up with her! It won't be easy, because any school pushes hard. Don't be discouraged, but realize that your memory fades and you have to push a little to get a coherent body of information in you mind all at once to see the interrelationships. You have two advantages over your daughter: you have seen the material before and you can concentrate on it alone.

    The next step, if you don't have time for night class, is to find a peer who is reviewing for some kind of test. An engineer studying for the Engineer in Training Exam (EIT, formerly FE) will be boning up on all sorts of practical tricks. This will be less than satisfying, but it can establish a relationship that works in the future. Who knows, you might find someone who just wants to study. Teaching others is what graduate students are forced to do. It's a great way to learn becuase the holes in your knowledge stand out sharply when you try to explain things to others =:] This is probably the best means you have to expand your knowledge in the short term.

    If you decide to go it alone, and you can do this, try to follow a college course. Go to any university web page and get the course curriculum that interests you. Then find out what the professor recomends for the course where you are. If it's not on a web page, go to their bookstore and see what book is on the shelf. It's generally the best, and at least represents much careful thought. Try to follow the class sylabus. The pace is usualy challenging and involves much homework every night! If you are interested in engineering math, I strongly recomend the CRC Math Handbook as general reference and the appropriate Schwam's Outline for the course you try.

    Earning an ordinary undergraduate degree while working takes an effort few people are willing to make. You will be forced to study stuff you don't like under people you like even less. Imagine your least favorite grade school English teacher and give them ten times the power over your future. If you are willing to risk poverty, divorce and great disatisfaction you could quit your job. Don't expect to finish in less than four years. If you keep your job, don't expect to finish in less than eight. If you push too hard you will end up loathing the very thing that now entertains you. All that said, people have done it and done very well.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  165. Re:Mathematics by KshGoddess · · Score: 1
    The nice thing is that it lets me get a second degree at my own pace whilst still working. Either I can just take the courses at the CC, "cash in" the credits and come out with an AA degree, or can transfer the credits over and finish up at a "full" university to get a BA, still part-time.

    <AOL&gtMETOO</AOL>I've got to admit that when I was a young pup just out of high school (not that I'm THAT old now...), I thought community college/technical college was a joke, and it's forced down students' throats in high school that if you want to get anywhere in life, you must have a college degree.

    What I really needed was someone to sit me down and say, "Look. College is a bunch of stuff that's just like high school but ten times worse, and you'll be bored and disgusted with it. You won't start independant thinking courses until your Junior year. You'd be better off taking a vocational degree at a tech college"

    What ended up happening was that I flunked out of one college, and got fed up with another, and started working. I built up my knowledgebase during my downtime at work, and voila! I'm doing NT administration because the job market sucks for "pure" Unix Admins where I am. So, I'm going back to college, taking a course in C at the community college near my house for US$11/Credit Unit + fees (~110 for the class I'm in), instead of taking one at the University near my work for US$400-700 + fees.

    It's not too expensive, and it keeps me on my mental toes after a long day of clicking 'OK' and 'Next'.

    Not only can I cash in and come out with an AA, or transfer the credits over to a university, but sometimes the community colleges offer certificate programs. The place I go offers certificates in Unix Admin, Cisco (with test prep for the Cisco certs), Database Admin, and even Video Game Programming in their CS discipline.

    --
    It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
  166. Re:MOD PARENT UP *H*A*H*A*H*A* by mstorer3772 · · Score: 1


    Subject: "Mod parent up"

    sig: "Moderators suck"

    Does anyone else find this amusing?

    --
    Fooz Meister
  167. I little bit of practical advice by Analog+Squirrel · · Score: 1
    This may seem obvious, but it wasn't obvious to me until I was a grad student: mathematics is NOT a spectator sport. ALWAYS ask questions about what you don't understand. Don't feel nervous or self-conscious about it - if there's a thing you don't understand, chances are, there's at least a half-dozen other people who are right there with you, confused. Also, don't forget to take advantage of a professor/instructor's office hours. In my experience, many professors are lousy lecturers, but once they get into a one-on-one situations, the are absolutely WONDERFUL! Don't necessarily stick to "official" office hours either. If there's something bothering you, stop by the prof's office and ask "do you have a couple of minutes?" You might get blown off(always be polite when this happens, after all, this IS the prof's time you're trying to make use of), but often as not, the prof's willing to talk to people.


    Active involvement is the best way to learn math!

    --
    I'd rather be flying
  168. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "get in the game and stay in the game"

    does anyone else think of Quake3 after reading this?

    I knew I shoulda studied harder in High school.

  169. 2 Reasons for Going to School by nemski · · Score: 1

    IMHO, going to school would serve two ends. First, it would put you with others who HOPEFULLY want to learn and a professor (or grad student) who HOPEFULLY wants to teach. Second, and probably most important, here's another opportunity to teach your daughter a life lesson: Learning doesn't stop when you get out of school. She will also see you struggle and succeed with the some of the issues that she is dealing with. Good luck in whatever you decide!

    --
    Some people have a way with words, others not have way.
  170. First get a copy of Prof. McSquared's. . . by kfg · · Score: 2

    Calculus Primer:

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/091323247 5/ qid=1025647279/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-8828002-34688 55

    Read it. Work the problems. Have fun.

    While you're doing that also read David Berlinski's 'A Tour of the Calculus:'

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/067974788 5/ qid=1025647399/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/002-8828002-34688 55

    This is an English language history of the calculus that is simply supurb.

    If you get stumped by some of the algebra, ( which you really shouldn't), then grab that textbook of your daughter's, if you've done math before you don't need a class, just to work some problems to bring you back up to speed.

    By the time you're through with these two books you'll either have sated your current mathmatical bent or have a much better idea of what you want long term.

    Be warned though, Berlinski's book is likely to set you off on a math 'jag' that you may never recover from.

    KFG

  171. Watch out! "Math" is ambigous... by LoveMe2Times · · Score: 1

    You say that you've taken up an interest in "Math" again. No offense, but from the sound of it, you weren't into math too much when you were younger. Odds are that the vast majority of "Math" that you were ever exposed to was mechanical equation manipulation. This tends to be tedious and very, very boring. Several people have asked, what do you want?, and I agree. More specifically, do you want to be good at manipulating equations? Or are you more interested in discovering neat mathisms that just blow your mind and permanently change your outlook on reality (and you don't mind if your mechanical skills are poor)? It will be easy to find classes to help you with your mechanical skills, and there are plenty of "fun math" books out there. There don't tend to be a lot of "fun math" classes, though hunt around and you might get lucky. The most important thing of all, IMHO, is to find a partner in crime. Pick a book and the two of you spend every other Saturday around a white board working through a handful of the easy excersises. When you get stuck, find somebody that knows more and ask. It won't take you long to get the gist of the topic. Then pick another book. Repeat until bored. You'll probably learn what you want or realize that you're actually much more serious about it within a year or two.

  172. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by daanger0us · · Score: 1

    another good idea is if you meet someone who is extremely good in math, ask them to help! Most math heads enjoy speaking of math and enjoy helping people.

    another idea is to see if there are any types of math clubs or friends or people you can meet that enjoy doing math that you can periodically meet with and hash out problems.

    When I was in college my buddy and I would always do our math homework together at the library. He was much further in math then I was. If I had a problem I would just voice the problem out to him. About half the time, just saying the problem out loud would make me realize what the prob was but having him there for advice really helped me out.

    --
    Aliens? Magnetic Rings?! Bah! Who needs that when we have
  173. How to Ace Calculus by peacefinder · · Score: 1

    I did this myself a couple years ago. I found it not nearly as hard as it seemed back when I was 20, mostly because I did the homework. :)

    The best advice I can give you is to get the book "How to Ace Calculus" and follow the advice therein. The book is enlightening, engaging, and even funny.

    --
    With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
  174. library? by donour · · Score: 1

    Public Library?

  175. Job oppertunity by cybercuzco · · Score: 2

    Im sure you could find a job at Arthur Anderson. Theyre looking for adults with interest in math now, after their "Hire adults with no math skills" program didnt pan out.

    --

  176. Or you could do what my dad did... by allism · · Score: 2

    (not saying that my dad is some super-parent, but this is one of the fonder memories I have of my childhood)

    My father was in college when I was young (until I was 7 or 8). Sometimes he would read his college-level textbooks to me. Since I didn't know any better, and I thought Dad was God (partly because he always told me, "I'm God, I know everything"), I didn't realize that the college textbooks were supposed to be over my head. Bottom line, for me anyway, was that it didn't especially matter what we were doing together for quality time so much as that we were spending quality time together. I am NOT an advocate of pushing your child to learn things that are beyond what is appropriate to fulfill your own fantasies, I just believe that kids are capable of understanding and enjoying a lot more than we give them credit for, especially when the teacher is a loving parent who is sharing their time with them instead of sending them off for lessons with someone who doesn't know them and doesn't have an emotional investment.

    Two books that I remember fondly from my childhood, and that still serve as good reference books for number theory, are Mathematical Circus and Mathematical Magic Show, both by Martin Gardner. These were both really fun books that are also challenging reading for an adult. I originally picked them up because I thought they had cool names (kids love magic shows and circuses, ya know), and I picked them up again a few years ago and still found them entertaining and very informative. The author doesn't just write math books either--he is a well-known creator of puzzles and brainteasers and has done some annotated versions of literary classics. He seems to teach critical thinking rather than rote mathematics.

  177. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

    This is especially true for introductory classes at larger universities. I was a math teaching assistant at Ohio State in the late '70s. Typical introductory classes (algebra II through second quarter calculus) had about 150 to 180 students in a large lecture hall. Very easy to get lost in that size crowd. The recitation sections were taught by T.A.s like me with usually around 25 to 30 students. You would probably be noticed there. Generally, the exams were given at the lecture hall so you need to attend regularly enough to know when NOT to show up becuase IDs were checked at midterms and finals to make sure somebody wasn't sending in a substitute to get them through the class.

    Generally, if you have a decent cover story like you've been away from it for a while (actually true) and just need a refresher before you jumb back into the next course (who knows, maybe someday), most (but not necessarily all) instructors would let you sit in as long as you don't create a disturbance. The school mainly wants to get paid if they're going to issue you a sheepskin. The instructor probably doesn't really care as long as nobody official notices and you're not a problem.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  178. Math Self-Help by larrybud · · Score: 1
    I wouldn't recommend school unless you really need the guidance; it is a rare teacher who doesn't suck the joy out of mathematics.

    If you would like an entertaining and highly informative overview of mathematics, check out Mathematics: From the Birth of Numbers by Jan Gullberg.

  179. me two by infinite+jester · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    ((( I had problems this morning with the powers of ten. )))

    hey, me too, particularly the part about 10 raised to an irrational exponent z defined as e^(z ln[10])

    here's my simple, two-step process for improving your math skills:
    (1) put a calculus book in your bathroom
    (2) eat a lot of spicy food

    --
    i thought, therefore i was...
    1. Re:me two by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Your calculus reference mad me remember someone's sig file: Don't mix alcohol and math. Don't drink and derive.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  180. Check out Project MATHEMATICS! by nuzoo · · Score: 1

    Check out Project MATHEMATICS! [href="http://www.projectmathematics.com/], which was started by ex-JPL computer graphics god, Jim Blinn (he was once called "the 10 best programmers in the world"). He won a MacAurthur genius award, back around 91, for this series of educational math videos, after which he immediately bought a Ferrari and got a girlfriend. --DM

  181. Learn applications as well! by tetsuji · · Score: 1
    Math is principally a logical language that describes reality, and I think one of the better ways to understand mathematics is to study physics. When I was in college, calculus was pretty meaningless until I started using it in physics class; by the same token, there were things covered in my Physics 101 class that didn't really make sense until I started doing vector calculus.

    What is important, though, is that because I learned how to use it in physics, I still remember a lot of my calculus, and at the same time concepts that seemed initially counterintuitive from physics didn't become meaningful until I could understand the math behind them. So studying both might help you benefit more from your efforts.

    1. Re:Learn applications as well! by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Actually this is good point. Most teachers would prefer physics to be the first science taught, it is just that the math skills are not there. So it waits to Jr/Sr in HS or college

  182. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have grey hairs and I go to class for
    a second degree at night. Conspicuous?
    hmm sometimes, but in calculus I there
    were several people between 40 and 50.
    I've seriously thought about sitting in
    on a class like calculus II to get my
    feet alittle wet before taking it officially.
    Here is the dilemma though, you have to
    be prepared to shrug your shoulders if
    you are supposed to turn in a homework
    and act like you don't care that you didn't
    do it, and you will also have to avoid
    quizzes and exams, and while most classes
    like that at huge universities are like
    being in a stadium, medium sized schools
    may still take the initial roll. I thought
    the potential for exposure to be, not high,
    but not zero either.

  183. Community College == MIT by xintegerx · · Score: 1

    NOBODY can beat the deal you get with a community college. Heck, your taxes subsidize it--so use it or lose it!

    Community colleges have small classrooms (not halls) of 30 students or less, and the atmosphere is more loose. Each classroom comes with a LIVE professor to teach you, test you, motivate you, help you learn and answer questions! That's all part of the standard package! So real you can see/touch him or her! (Don't.)

    And it's all for a couple hundred bucks! And the credits are accepted at universities and employers will take them, too.

    There is a drawback to community colleges. Most administrators don't want to talk about it. 1) Because many "elitist" people disrespect community colleges as weak, a student could feel he shouldn't have to do the same difficulty work as students in universities. 2) And because you pay $40,000/year less than your friends for the same education, you could become very lazy. Because of these two things, one might feel less motivation to do well than a university student would have. And if one wants to transfer to a university afterwards with these grades, ...well you see the dillema. :)

    NO BULL! I took University Physics I last semester at my community college. Everyone was very lazy. I personally did no work for some reason, and the class was not impossible. Ultimately, 25 out of 30 students had to withdraw. Some think the class was hard because the professor was a very smart MIT grad, but we like to think it's because of the effect I just described. ;)

    [Another plus: CC's have very lax withdrawal deadlines--we could withdraw up to two weeks before the final exam, I believe].

    Seriously however, he said my community college was equivalent to MIT. But we all know that with little respect for CC's, it's hard to feel motivated to work as hard as MIT students do!!

    So do be careful--even if you do great in good math class at a CC but end up with a hard-to-earn C grade, idiots might snicker at you.

    DISCLAIMER: (I/my friend/my neighbor/my dog) (am/is/used to be/will be) the student body (trustee/president/vice president) of a CC located in (New England/New York/New Jersey.)

    So I might be partly biased :)


    Also, 58 percent of community college students are women.

    Apparently, even TAYLOR & WASHINGTON went to a community college!

  184. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat.="Hank" by paiute · · Score: 1

    Hey, I remember that show. (You'll need a canteen truck.) http://us.imdb.com/Title?0058811

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  185. How about a hs teacher by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    I taught high school math, so I might be a little bias.
    Have you thought about finding a high school teacher to tutor you? Meet once a week and pay him/her x amount of dollars per week. Ask any of the high schoolers, they know who the good ones are. I would think most hs teachers would be happy to do it. They would probably have some older books they would give to you or sell cheap. This would give you more flexibility than a college class. Of cource you wouldn't get credit.

    Also, if you don't care about credit, just show up at a local college class. Buy the book, sit in on lectures, take the test(don't hand it in). Many profs wouldn't mind.

  186. A Transition to Advanced Mathematics by mboedick · · Score: 1

    I recently went back to school to get my M.S. in Computer Science and the book A Transition to Advanced Mathematics helped me get back up to speed after not doing any serious math for a while. It gave me the solid foundation I need to get through the difficult math ahead.

    It starts out with basic logic, moves on to various proof methods, then to set theory, induction, relations, functions, groups.

    This material is to a person who studies mathematics as learning how to read is to a person who studies literature,

  187. Math Book by warens · · Score: 1



    Arithmetic Refresher by A.A.Klaf
    Dover Publications:ISBN 0-486-21241-6

    Great Start for renewed interest in Math.

    Check out all his books!

  188. Alternative proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think about the numbers for a bit:

    166... == 1.5 * (10^n + 10^n-1 + ... + 1/1.5)

    ...664 == 6 * (10^n + 10^n-1 + ... + 1/1.5)

    Then it's just a simple cancellation :)

    (I initially tried just having 1 at the end
    of the expansion, but then you are left with
    an extra half - but that nicely explains the
    extra 2 you get when you multiply the 6 through)

  189. USENET by Cougar1 · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised I haven't seen any reference to Usenet news groups. There are several math related Usenet groups including:

    alt.algebra
    alt.algebra.help
    sci.mathematics
    sci.math
    sci.math.num-analysis
    sci.math.research .
    sci.math.symbolic

    In general I would first recommend taking a community college or University course (my experience is that either can be acceptable, although community colleges do not offer advanced math courses). However, for a cheaper alternative, get a good math textbook; perhaps, the one being used in a nearby college math course. Then, work through the book and if you get stumped, ask questions on Usenet.

    You might also want to work through some supplemental problems. There are several math books in the "Schaums" series that have lots of pre-worked example problems for you to practice on.

    Good Luck.

  190. Videotape calculus lessons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For calculus, consider the Teaching Company video course "Change and Motion: Calculus Made Clear". It's 24 lectures and only $65 with shipping. And Teaching Company stuff is almost always super. They're at www.teachco.com.

  191. Online Courses/Degree Programs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to take math courses, but can't take the time out to attend traditional classes during the evening. Can anyone recommend a college or university that has a substantial number online math course offerings? I've found many communicty colleges that have one or two basic courses, but that's it. I'd be interested in an entire online undergrad program!

    thanks.

  192. The Mechanical Universe -- Goodstein by Sebastopol · · Score: 3, Informative

    More physics than math, but a great place to start. If you buy the series (or tape it off PBS), you can watch it again and again until you finally learn the concepts. It opens a whole new world in math and physics. It was recorded and animated (by Pr. Blinn, no less!) in the mid-80s, and is still relevant.

    -S

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  193. Various books by jejones · · Score: 2
    OK...
    • G.H. Hardy wrote several books on math for the interested layperson: A Course of Pure Mathematics, A Mathematician's Apology, and one titled something like Mathematics for the Common Man.
    • Lancelot Hogben's Mathematics for the Million is a standard of this sort; Hogben's ideology gets a bit in the way--he, very much unlike Hardy, has very little truck for pure mathematics.
    • Isaac Asimov's Realm of Numbers and Realm of Algebra are classics--and, alas, darned hard to find.
    • Jagjit Singh wrote several books on technical and mathematical matters for the layperson, including a very good one on information theory.
    As someone else has mentioned, Dover reprints a LOT of good books on many subjects, especially mathematics.

    Now...a lot of the popular mathematics books concentrate on analysis. Internet Ninja didn't specify a particular interest--algebra (in the abstract sense, i.e. groups, rings, fields, and the like), topology, category theory, and so on. Knowing whether IN has specific interests would help.

  194. Teaching Maths to a 5 yr old child with an IQ:190 by germanbirdman · · Score: 1

    A good female friend of mine in the US has a son who could read when he was just a little over 2. Yesterday I had to explain to him on the phone how a DC motor works, because he wanted to connect the 110V mains (he lives in the US) to his toy rocket and I tried to explain to him that it is damn dangerous and wouldn't do a bit of good given that it is AC and not DC and that the motor just wasn't designed for such high fields even if it were DC.
    He is so damn clever, can already do simple math, but he really needs to be able to solve equasions, derive functions and stuff because of the stuff he is interested in (how high will the rocket go, how can I make it go up faster).
    I am a Master of Electrical Enginering so I have quite a good knowledge about Mathematics in general and also higher math. But how do you go about teaching a child that? I can also only help so much because I live in Germany (still) and my friend in the US. What can I recommend him to read so it is not too boring and understandable at the same time?
    What can I do just using a phone and an instant messenger?
    Children's physics books are way too simple for him, adult physics books require way too much mathematical knowledge.
    Feel free to email me at germanbirdmanATchaospowerDOTde

  195. Read Godel Escher Bach by phish · · Score: 1

    Oh, and while you're at it, if you finish it, share your insight with /. since most people here own it, yet have never made it past the 3rd chapter!

    1. Re:Read Godel Escher Bach by berteag00 · · Score: 1

      I second this reccomendation.

      Godel, Escher, Bach is an excellent exploration of many facets of mathematics, including number theory, formal systems, logic and proof, chaos theory and recursion. It also covers many, many other topics including cognitive science, AI theory, and biology ... according to the back, "an entire humanistic education between the covers of a single book."

      GEB attempts to answer the question, "How is it that an amalgam of inanimate systems can develop something as striking as self-awareness, intelligence, conciousness?" Not light reading, certainly, but very entertaining if you love learning about "neat" things. The dialogs between each chapter are also no end of entertaining. (And yes, phish, I will write a /. review once I'm finished ... I'm only about 2/3 of the way through at the moment.)

  196. How do you learn? by BanteringCTO · · Score: 1

    You pose an interesting question, and I've seen a wealth of valuable responses. What I haven't seen (having read a fair number of comments, but by no means all of them) is any consideration of how you learn. After nearly ten years working in other fields, I chose to switch to Computer Science. As my first degree was in Sociology, I had a bit of catching up to do. A couple of degrees later, and after a whole lot of Math courses, I now know I learn best by applying principles. I need to understand the underlying theory, but more than that, I need to SOLVE PROBLEMS. That is not a universal requirement. There are those among us who can derive solutions from a purely theoretical base. I'm not among them. If you are like me, you will do well taking classes from any instructor qualified to teach at the level you find yourself. In other words, read the theory and then take a class at a community college (cheap) to practice the application. On the other hand, if you are one of the fortunate ones who sees applications directly from theory, I advise you to go straight to a university near you. It will cost more on the face of it ($/CH), but save you time. Though it's trite, time really is money. If you intend to apply your learning (and I can tell you there are MANY ways to apply Math and make a killing), and are capable of learning this way, it's your best solution. Good Luck!

    --
    The world of achievement has always belonged to the optimist. -- J. Harold Wilkins
  197. Set a first goal and work on that by aGuyNamedJoe · · Score: 1

    As many have said, it depends on what your goal is -- so set one.

    If you don't know exactly, that's ok -- you're not being required to do this, so you can change your mind whenever you feel like it. So, spend some time thinking about what you think you'd like to do First -- you can always do something else later.

    After you pick a first goal, focus on that and find out what you need to know to get there -- it probably won't be just one thing.

    For instance, I got interested in Rubik's Cube and wanted to understand the math behind it -- so I started learning Group Theory -- that led to other things. Now I want to have a better understanding of Wiles' proof of FLT (I've a reasonable background in Theory of Computing/etc., so it's not completely out of the question) There are lots of things I didn't know anything about when I started, but I'm making progress, and having that as a long range goal is helping me find more accessible topics to start with.

    I've been spending time working on these kinds of Math as a hobby for several years. Among the things I've found that work:
    1. browse through the books in the bookstores and/or library to see if you can find one that's about a topic of interest, and at a level you can understand, or almost understand. There's a tremendous variability in that regard.
    2. Ask people who are familiar with the area you're interested in for some recommendations -- If the books are too advanced, see what books they reference.
    3. When you have a book you like, read it and do all the problems -- you can't learn Math by reading -- you have to get the experience. -- If you pick an area where there are proofs, work on understanding the proofs -- that's where the information is.
    4. Keep the book in the bathroom and read it instead of that magazine.
    5. Find a friend/group of friends -- As someone else said, it's much easier to learn with others. Take turns explaining how a proof / topic works.
    6. Take (or audit) courses in a local college -- but beware of the audit-trap -- being too busy to do the homework -- if you don't do the homework you're probably wasting your time/money in the course.
    7. use the web -- there're a lot of papers / people with "weird" hobbies (like math) and they often like to talk about it. -- Note that your group could be a newsgroup/mailinglist/chatroom...
    8. There are lots of used books available on the Web -- so you can often find that "Great" book that's now out of print -- and at a reasonable price.
    9. Don't give up, but don't be afraid to add a new, easier, goal to get to first.

  198. My cue...just jump in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got laid off last year and after rounds of frustrating interviews (I was lucky to get some), I decided to follow my heart, do what I truly love on top of making sure never to go thru this again.

    -First of all, I strongly believe that the current state of science is fundamentally flawed and in order to make great strides you have to question everything and keep in mind all those assumptions we have been making all this time.
    -The likes of Stephen Hawking are snake oil sales men. Avoid their ilk. (Read Wolfram's work.)

    - Never ever take anything for granted. Find out how those formulas that you're learning in class were developed. (you normally get the initial intro and then go onto how they work).

    - Avoid pop - mathematics. like prime # generation.
    - Research math history with little western influence.
    (there's alot to be learned from the Egyptians, Middle Easterns and Chineese not to mention some African and S.American work)
    Read Bell's books for more conventional history.
    ( I stress the purpose of studying the history is to see how what we use came about. )
    The underlying theme here is to avoid rote learning.

    Decided to go to Law school and take advanced science courses in Chem, Biology, Physics and maths. No Holds barred. People think I'm crazy, but many don't know the likes of "Leibniz".

    Anyway 6 months into my madness and I've discovered:
    - doing your own math study and research is a lot better than attending most college classes. But you need good contacts that can help you when you get stuck or motivate you. Take some math classes strictly for networking and in the process question everything you are taught. Ironically, few instructors will tolerate you. Those who do should go in your address book. The rest don't know what they are doing.

    Remember advanced maths is easier than the basics.
    If anything looks too complicated it's either wrong or has a more elegant solution.
    If you cannot find that elegant solution go back and question everything even commonly assumed proofs. (that's where the knowledge of history comes in).
    If you cannot explain something to your kids then it's not perfect and needs further exploration.

    ... I gotta run more logical info later.

  199. Better ask first by Otter · · Score: 2
    A year ago, just walking in to a class would have been fine, even if you're obviously not a student. Science and math departments are used to odd people floating around. Since September 11, though, universities have gone on an antiterrorism kick and you're likely to get hassled if you look out of place.

    Talk to the professor first. They'll generally be thrilled to have someone there who is genuinely interested in learning. I had a few dropins when I was TA'ing and found them a nice break from pre-meds. (My favorite was the dog who attended a genetics class every day with his surfer dude owner. It was a 75 minute class period and the students mostly dozed off after 40, but the dog paid careful attention to every word.)

    If you want to get graded, though, auditing is probably necessary.

  200. Mathematics by hackus · · Score: 1

    If I may suggest, perhaps using the machine to help you?

    After all, computers do Mathematics much faster than we do and are quite good at it.

    I would consult a good book on the topic that combines computing with Mathematics.

    Here are some good books in my library you can also get at your local Barnes and Noble or order online:

    Astronomical Algorithms, Jean Meeus, Willmann-Bell,Inc. ISBN 0-943396-35-2

    Fundamentals of Celestial Mechanics J.M.A. Danby, Willmann-Bell, ISBN 0-943396-20-4

    You might also want to check out:

    http://www.wolfram.com for Mathematica. I think this is the single most important program I possess, and it runs natively on Linux.

    Without it my understanding of Mathematics would be quite dim indeed.

    I use the machine and computer programming to understand mathematics from a mechnical end first, since I know what operations fundamentally have to happen to obtain a answer once I program the computer.

    This yields, more often than not, basic intuition into the more abstract problems one faces in the celestial mechanics field or even pure mathematics IMHE.

    Many of the algorithms presented are in BASIC or Fortran and are fairly easy to understand.

    I have converted quite a few of these algorithms into Java Computing Objects. I am building a gravitational computing engine in Java to enable my telescope to be remote controlled and also track asteroids/comets.

    Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  201. Take the damned night classes by Headius · · Score: 1

    What are you, some kind of wussy? You want to learn without putting in any effort? I've got my fulltime job, wife and kid, two houses, aging parents to support, and I manage to find time for 9 hours of night class per week, plus the associated homework. Turn off the damned TV, put down that cheeseburger, and stop yer whining.

  202. A great book is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mathematics: From the Birth of Numbers
    by Jan Gullberg

    about $50 US and a great read for anyone interested in mathematics.. it covers mathematics from its most humble origins (the history of counting systems, etc) all the way through differential equations. Very nice book for enthusiasts and novices alike!

  203. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. (OT) by God!+Awful · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I went to university as a young, green freshman thinking I wanted to learn. After a couple of years there I realized that all I wanted was a degree. I'm a person who is genuinely interested in learning and I follow the latest math and science news with great interest. However at university they spend a lot of time teaching you procedures for applying formulas, because those make the best kinds of test questions. I find that type of knowledge very mundane. I would rather decide for myself the kinds of things I want to learn.

    Your experiences may vary, but I would have dropped out of university a lot sooner if I had thought I could do so without endangering my earning potential. But there are a lot of people who attend university because they want to. Do you really think most of these students would pay tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars, to get the official diploma if they didn't have to? Many of these students used to stand in line to get a refund for the $5 "voluntary" contribution to the school paper.

    Your analogy is stupid. As if the $50,000 that one might spend to get a "brand name" education somehow relates to whether you will pay $20 for a CD or steal it off the net. I can only speak for myself, but when I buy a CD, I buy it for the music. I don't steal it off the net because I'm a fairly honest person, but I will buy it from a used CD store if I can get a better price.

    Anyway, back on the original topic. I think the story submitter needs to decide what kind of knowledge about math he wants to learn. I have an interest in math, but I don't need to apply it in real life, so I am content to read about cryptography, logic, fractals, Fermat's last theorem, and all the pop-math stuff. You can find excellent books for the lay reader, with the best probably being "Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid". Martin Gardner's columns from Scientific American have all been archived and published in book form. As for learning whole subject areas, try to skim a variety of books rather than reading one in depth. That way, you will get a better grasp of the subject matter (and if you find that you prefer one of the books over the others, at least you have a point of reference).

    -a

  204. oops by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    I gotta stop multitasking - that's 6 and 24, not 6 and 4. The '...4' becomes '...40' and we need to add 24 (not 4) to get it back to a '...64' pattern.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  205. Executive summary by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 2
    Oh geez, haven't we been here before? This time it's math instead of CS. Let me envision the responses:

    Poster #1: "I'm a Ph.D. in Math at the University of Zimbabwe. Applied math is a waste time. You should learn nothing but theory and proofs. If you try and do anything useful with math, then you're a fuckin' sellout. PS: I love Goedel."

    49%: Right on!

    Poster #2: "You don't need any college at all! I make $600,000 a year coding VB, and all I did was get a pirated copy of VB and bought a book of Teach Yourself Visual Basic ASP.NET.COM+.ActiveX In 42 Days For Dummies. PS. Math is for weenies.

    Another 49%: Right on!

    Me: Theory and practice are both important in the world. Ignore one at your peril. Learn both, and you will be better off. Tilt the mix to either end according to your interest.

    The remaining 2%: -1, Flamebait

    --
    I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
  206. Mathmatics, from the birth of numbers by glsunder · · Score: 1

    You might check out "Mathmatics, from the birth of numbers" by Jan Gullberg. It covers a wide range of math (from anchient & modern number systems to trig to fractals to Fourier series) though probably not in depth enough to learn it well. You'd want more specific books for areas you really wanted to learn, but it'd give you the idea of what is out there.

  207. cc... definitely by flint · · Score: 1

    I was in the exact same position. A community college will be much cheaper, will have real teachers who teach, etc. Perfect for covering trig, advanced algebra, and first year calculus if you get that far. When you get about halfway through the first year of calculus you can reevaluate what you've learned, and where you want to go with math. Besides, up to this point you're doing a lot of rote memorization and a cc prof with a master's is just as good as anyone else.

    I got to this point as a 32 year old engineering major when the country began to "turn swords into ploughshares." I switched to a CIS degree (BS business) and haven't regretted its fence-straddling properties a bit.

  208. Here's what to do... by zungu · · Score: 1

    Hi, I wanted study math for the FE test. I had a science background, not engineering one. So I did this: 1. Brought Precalculus from Schaum's Series. This got my algebra rolling. 2. Then I got hold of a fantastic book on Calculus - Calculus Made Easy by S. Thompson and edited by the great Martin Gardener. This will give you a self contained foundation for calculus. 3. That should get you started. You can use Discrete Math by Liu if that is the way you want to go. If Comp Sci math intrests you then Knuth's Concrete Math is a good book to get all that you need to know.

  209. Schaum's Outlines by shoppa · · Score: 2
    Especially if you are interested in the "practical" side of math, there are numerous Schaum's Outlines available at levels ranging from introductory algebra to vector calculus and differential equations.

    They're very much an "engineer's" view of math; their emphasis is more on results than on process or proof, but they're a great buy and very much emphasize the learn it by doing it approach.

  210. NetMath by radiotalent · · Score: 1

    If you are just curious about math...other suggestions have been made that make a lot of sense...especially auditing a college class and reading old textbooks.

    However, if you are thinking on building on this curiousity for a new/expanded degree and need college credit then your choices narrow. If you need a firm understanding of the basics...a community college gives the best "bang for the buck". Around here, the local community college is about one-third the cost of a traditional university.

    If you already have a firm understanding of the basics...I highly recommend NetMath at http://netmath.math.uiuc.edu/ . The courses offered are Calculus on up. Its a bit more expensive than attending a traditional university, and substantially more than a community college. And you need to be self-motivated. But there is plenty of help available, through chat hours and an assigned mentor (basically a Teachers Assistant) you share with a few other students. You can work it around your own schedule which, to me, makes up for the higher cost. Its offered through the University of Illinois and thus accepted as "real" college credit. And you use Mathematica in your studies which is really a powerful piece of software.

    Definitely check it out.

  211. Keith Devlin, "The Language of Mathematics" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would highly recommend this book!

    As a professional mathematician I can say
    that this book gets to the heart of what
    mathematics is about, yet does so in a
    very accessible way. People with only a
    limited mathematics background should be
    able to enjoy this book and come to a much
    better understanding of why mathematics is
    such an amazing discipline.

  212. Grey Labyrinth by Fjord · · Score: 2

    One site I like to visit is grey labyrinth. They semi-regularily put up new puzzles and a lot of them use some applied math. Not really a whole solution, but something to look over and point you in a few areas of math you can research on the net (like probability, induction, and others).

    --
    -no broken link
  213. I have to wonder by Jebediah21 · · Score: 2

    I have to wonder if this sudden interest in Math is do to recent drug use like LSD.

    --

    Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
  214. Hire a grad student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I recently wanted to learn some math, though at the other end of the difficulty spectrum-- I wanted to learn category theory, which is a sufficently abstract and advanced topic that it isn't taught in any classes in the local universities (which is some pretty good ones, seeing that I live in Boston.) So I put up posters in two local math and CS departments, soliciting people to teach me. I got inquiries from a couple of grad students, picked the one I liked best, and made a deal for him to come up with weekly lectures and homework sets. So far it's been great. He's a good teacher, I'm learning at a good clip, and the price is highly competitive with taking a university class (which, as I said, is not an option anyway.)

    While I was looking for a tutor, I discovered that math departments maintain a list of grad students interested in tutoring. Those lists didn't work for me, because none of the people on those lists knew category theory. But looking on those lists should work fine for tutoring in the kind of things you're looking for. The great thing about grad students is that they combine the following features: (a) some of them will soon be professors famous for their teaching, and (b) they are as poor as church mice and will take any reasonable offer.

  215. Standard Deviants by macemoneta · · Score: 1

    If you just want a quick and not so dry set of lectures, pick up a video tape or DVD from Standard Deviants:

    http://www.standarddeviants.com

    I viewed a few of their tapes on subjects I was interested in, and they gave me enough to get started on my own.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  216. Here's one resource: by RoscoHead · · Score: 1
    --

    Why is there only one Monopolies commission?
  217. Re:As Euclid said... RUBBISH. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your don't really know what mathematics is all about.

    How often do you hear brilliant mathematical break throughs?
    It's because such narrow minded views are held by so called mathematicians.

    Anyone with a love and a passion can learn mathematics at any age. (yes from 1yr - death).

  218. Ever hear of Ramanujan? by wirefarm · · Score: 2
    Do like Ramanujan and pick up an old copy of Synopsis of Elementary Results in Pure Mathematics by G. S. Carr - it will be almost impossible to find but could be worth it. ;-)

    Poor and almost uneducated, Ramanujan used that one book to teach himself and became on of the world's greatest mathematical minds. An outsider, he began corresponding with mathematicians at Oxford. They eventually brought him to England where the food killed him, I think.

    The link is to a pretty good background on him - I think it's pretty inspiring to anyone about to undertake what you are - Here's a bit from the site:

    In 1911 Ramanujan approached the founder of the Indian Mathematical Society for advice on a job. After this he was appointed to his first job, a temporary post in the Accountant General's Office in Madras. It was then suggested that he approach Ramachandra Rao who was a Collector at Nellore. Ramachandra Rao was a founder member of the Indian Mathematical Society who had helped start the mathematics library. He writes in [30]:-
    A short uncouth figure, stout, unshaven, not over clean, with one conspicuous feature-shining eyes- walked in with a frayed notebook under his arm. He was miserably poor. ... He opened his book and began to explain some of his discoveries. I saw quite at once that there was something out of the way; but my knowledge did not permit me to judge whether he talked sense or nonsense. ... I asked him what he wanted. He said he wanted a pittance to live on so that he might pursue his researches.

    Yes, this is the same guy who gets a mention in 'Good Will Hunting' - Back in high school in the early '80s, my math teacher had his picture above the blackboard and began each year by telling us about him - His personal hero.

    Cheers,
    Jim in Tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  219. Heres what I would do by Whardie+Jones · · Score: 0

    Go to a local community college library and I'm sure they will have several elemntary mathematics texts. Peruse them until you find one you like then order it on amazon.com. The truth is college classes won't let the material passively diffuse into your brain. Either way you're going to have to do some work and it will hurt a little. A college class serves as pressure to learn the material at a structured rate so it won't take you an infinite amount of time to learn the book. Take it one step at a time, maybe one section of a chapter a night and do a lot of the problems.

  220. if you have the will power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    , then learn on your own. In my experience it is much faster, but can lead to many road blocks.

    Buy used school books online for cheap. Get at least 2-3 in each subject. That may seem stupid but sometimes you cannot understand a concept and if you read from a different author, then it helps.

    Learn the subjects in this order

    Basic Algebra, Trig, and Geometry
    Precalculus
    Calculus, Multivariate Calculus, Linear Algebra

    On the side you can also learn Number Theory, Set Theory, Symbolic and Predicate Logic, and basic Combinatorics if you want. None of those subjects require much background.

    After this background you have many options, depending on what you like

    Probability and Statistics: self explanatory. Fun real world problems. Probability makes heavy use of calculus, be warned.

    Analysis: the construction of calculus from the ground up. very hard.

    Differential Equations: the most applicable of mathematics. Lots of calculus used to solve real physical problems.

    Modern/Abstract Algebra: this is not what you think it is. I cannot describe this to the uninitiated in less than three paragraphs.

    Topology: study of surfaces, spaces, and stuff. Fun with paper, playdoh, and strings.

    Differential Geometry: how to use calculus when space is not flat, immediate applications to many problems in engineering and General Relativity.

    Give your self a scheduled hour or two. Make sure you do it regularly. It has to become a habit, just like exercising, eating, and grooming.

    Read through each chapter slowly and do a couple of the home work problems. If you get stuck, reread the chapter carefully. If you are still stuck pull out a book of the same subject by a different author and read that.

    You will probably find that you are able to move much faster on your own (given that you understand the material). However as you proceed you may start to forget old things. Do not be a afraid to go back an work problems from previous chapters.

    It is not important to work every problem, nor is it important to read every chapter. In the forward, some times the author may point out what chapters contain the more important material.

    Good luck and remember math is difficult for everyone. That is why we do it, because it is the ultimate mental challange, the ultimate mental game. And the rewards are great.

  221. more recommendations by js7a · · Score: 1
    Here are some more recommendations, in no particular order:

    TableCurve -- this is a special case of number-crunching software, used to perform typical statistical analyses, and the integrated graphics are very good for most practical applications of statistics.

    Books:

    The Nuts and Bolts of Proofs -- the heart of correct math is showing your work, and this book shows you how.

    The Data Game -- Controverses in Social Science Statistics -- this really puts you in touch with the kinds of numbers you hear bandied about on the news, and what those numbers mean.

    The Maple V Learning Guide -- this comes with Maple (and presumably Matlab if you get it with Maple) and teaches more than a typical undergraduate mathematics program in about 270 pages. Actually, you have to delve into the hypertext documentation of Maple to get at all the calculus, linear algebra, statistics, etc., but it's all in there.

    Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability -- actually there were two volumes published in 1980, and one or both might have gone out of print.

    What If there were No Significance Tests -- this overpriced volume (which you should be able to get for much less from the publisher's site, www.erlbaum.com that doesn't seem to be working right now) explains exactly what soft scientists (e.g., psychologists) mean when they say something is true.

    100 Statistical Tests -- this reasonably priced but somewhat advanced, applied book will tell you how to tell whether something is true, even if you have to use indirect or partially correlated measurements. The author has provided tools with what you can quickly find the appropriate test(s) for most situations I can imagine.

  222. Read great math books and apply immediately by xelph · · Score: 1

    What about "A First Course In Calculus" by celebrated mathematician Serge Lang (humbling title for a 700-page book, by the way), just as a start? Then, you can go through other introductory book in the same yellow collection (UTM, Springer-Verlag). Later, you can decide to look at harder stuff. Of course, this requires a lot of discipline, so that is why you have to make it fun by applying your new knowledge immediately. If you know Java, for instance, why not try to design a fun little application (or even a full-featured library) for every chapter that you successfully complete? This is also why the Lang book is a good first choice. It contains important foundations, and you can write cool graphical programs that use them (visual applications will be more rewarding, as you can share them with your family and friends).

  223. I can help you. by slashclone · · Score: 1


    Easy, first get a shitty janitorial job at the local college, wait till professor post a challenge, quickly solve the problem but when professor notices you act disturbed. Get ready for a flood of juicy goverment jobs. And remember, its not your fault.

    Vlad.

    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil

    --


    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  224. Learning some math by moss1956 · · Score: 1

    I have been a college professor for close to twenty years. I have never, ever heard of anyone ever being sent away from a math class because they weren't registered.

    Thats right, just show up.

    A degree is secondary to an education. Go ahead, drop in. Let the professor know why you are there, and he will be overjoyed to have someone who is interested.

  225. Re:Small private colleges are a waste of money by moss1956 · · Score: 1

    I am a math professor at an enormous state university. Guess what? Not only do I care about my students - I also have something to say.

    I went to a private college. It took me about a term between the time I got interested in math till I figured out that my professors were much more into performing in front of an audience than they were into math.

    For imature people, private schools are the way to go, but if you are driven and you really want to know about math, there is no substitute for ESU.

  226. from a math major ... by smokestacklightning · · Score: 1

    Math ended up being my sixth major - so after being one month away from an English Lit degree, I had to re-learn all of the basics, I had my mom track down all my old texts, but one of the best flat-out ref's were the series put out by Cliff's, yes as in Cliff's notes. The books are about 300 pgs long and cover Euclidean Geomotry, Calculus, Advanced Calculus, Algebra etc... and are pretty good. Good luck.

  227. Highly dependent on location by fizbin · · Score: 2

    Community colleges vary in quality wildly from location to location. I wouldn't trust Burlington County Community college (Burlington County, NJ, where I currently live) with anything more advanced than introductory single variable calculus. On the other hand, the Philadelphia Inquirer did a story a few years back where they had some students attending the University of Pennsylvania come out to Montgomery County CC for a few classes of freshman physics and calculus. The community college students were using the same text as the ivy leaguers, and were proceeding at the same pace. Also, the sudents found the quality of instruction higher at the CC.

    As a basically uninformed guess, I'd assume that community colleges in tech. boom areas that do a lot of night-school business are better able to fund the more advanced courses (and hire the better teachers) than community colleges in areas that don't provide lots of night-class business.

  228. set goals... just a bit beyond your understanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok i thought about this cause its an interesting question and i truely think you need to be goal oriented.. at least at first.. i highly recommend sticking to REAL maths though.. by that i mean actual theorems and proofs.. anything else is like the difference between learning rote and understanding... and can i suggest you set as a goal understanding ... *bernsteins theorem* (from group theory) and/or (in another direction) *calculus of variations*..

    i'm am guessing you are not familiar with either if you've only been as far as first year. but they were the most interesting two theorems in my degree (honors math) .. and they arnt to far further.. both are covered in second year which makes them good goals.. just ahead of what you've understood in the path.. and they/(or the process of understanding them) will probably force you to reinterpret your previous understanding of their respective fields.. actually i tell a lie there is heaps of third year level stuff that will blow your mind.. in analysis for instance, did you know that if you assume that there is an axiom called the axiom of choice anyway its implications include being able to take a 3dsphere in RxRxR and rearranging to give two spheres of equal volume! and from there its only just begining.. but one theorem at a time, eah.. ;)

  229. Don't take a math course -- find a good math prof by jamesk · · Score: 2

    Towards the end of my mathematics degree I discovered the greatest secret for ***REALLY*** enjoying and getting into any mathematical subject -- simply ask the other students who there favourite math lecturers were.

    In my final year I only took courses that were taught by those individuals which were regarded as gifted lecturers or who could enjoy themselves in class with their students. It was the VERY BEST year I ever had in school and one which even today (15 years afterwards) brings a smile to my face. I have shared this secret with a dozen young students (co-op students, children of friends and co-workers, etc) and each and every one has repeatedly thanked me for it. Ask other students who they really enjoyed being with and why and try to make your decision based on their answers. You might be pleasantly surprised

  230. do you need lectures? by g4dget · · Score: 2
    I have never gotten much out of lectures. Maybe you'll find that just reading a lot will do and get you to your goal faster. Also, thinking about and tackling interesting problems is probably the best way of learning a subject.

    Of course, some places (like MIT) put their lectures on the web now. You can view Strang's linear algebra lectures on the web--you can't do much better than that (I leave out the link--no need to burden his site, but if you really care, it's easy to find).

  231. have you thought of distance education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in a similar situation, albeit without the wife and kids, and here is what I did:

    The university where I'm currently doing my undergrad (Waterloo, Canada) offers distance ed courses in math, at both the high school and university level. Since I had a really poor mathematical background initially, I started by redoing all the math I took in high school (pre-cal, cal, linear algebra) thru their distance ed program. I worked on the material at home and I also got a private tutor who was a math grad student to help me. A lot of my friends were pure math grad students at the time, so talking about math with them helped a lot as well. I found that the distance ed courses were extremely well designed, and I could call up my profs to talk to them when I needed help. I had always thought of distance ed as second best to taking a class in person, but these classes were seriously 10x better than the math classes I took in high school.

    Each class cost something like 125$ + a 40$ book.
    You work on the material at your own pace. When you're ready to write the exam, you ask for the university to send it to you.

    This approach worked fairly well for me. Once that was finished, I enrolled at Waterloo as a full-time math undergrad and was able to take advanced classes (for the top 5 or 10% of their students) and do well.

    Good luck! Math is awesome!

  232. Have fun! (Mathematical recreations) by dwheeler · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As others have noted, how you approach learning math partly depends on what you plan to do with it. But if part of your purpose is to have fun, then I suggest having fun as part of the process!

    There are lots of "mathematical recreations" and "math puzzles" that are fun to try solving, in the same way that it can be fun solving other puzzles. And sometimes you may see a variation on that puzzle that's fun (and truly new). Not all of them are truly critical from the point of view of furthering the advancement of mathematics, but they help develop the mind, and if your purpose is to have fun, start now!

    For example, I learned about the ``four fours'' problem as a kid (using exactly 4 fours, create legal mathematical expressions to compute 0, 1, 2, 3, etc.). Recently I created a definitive list of answers for the four fours problem. I also played with various really weird bases. Will these change the universe? No. But in the process I learned more than I knew before, and I enjoyed the process.

    If nothing else, if you enjoy the process, you're more likely to continue doing it.

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
  233. Mathematical Isolation by matroid · · Score: 2
    Learning from books is all well and good, but I truly feel that for one to fully develop one's mathematical abilities, one must be part of an academic community, engaging in academic dialogue with living, breathing "math-people." Whether you are a Ph.D., or a middle-schooler, the BEST way to learn mathematics is by actively and routinely doing it with others.

    Anyway, if you're serious about learning mathematics but scared of the cost, go to your nearest University and just sit in on the class. Listen to the lecture, ask questions, take notes, do homeworks, take tests, just don't pay. I teach mathematics at the college level... if a students showed up in my classroom who seriously wanted to learn, but didn't want to pay tuition, I would be more than supportive of his/her presence in my class. A number of my colleagues feel the same way -- learning should transcend economic boundaries. (On the other hand, though, some of my peers in our University's Physics department like the fact that tuition weeds out the middle-aged crackpots with their pseudo-scientific TOEs). For math books freely downloadable online, dig around at http://www.math.umn.edu/~garrett

  234. for the true math geek by LEPP · · Score: 1

    There is a book called Mathmatics From the Birth of Numbers by Jan Gullberg. This book is $50 American. It starts with the concept of numbers in different cultures all the way through calculus including Diff eqs, harmonics, probability, matrices, integration, power series, methods of approximation, trig, analytic geometry ... This is a fantastic book. If you have a good foundation but were not able to tie it all together, this is the book for you. Each chapter gives you enough examples to tie the theories together but not enough to teach the concepts without a foundation. Get the book if you are intersted in math.

  235. e-learning in the uk by signbrowser · · Score: 1

    http://www.nln.ac.uk/materials.asp
    'interactive online learning materials' created in the UK for further education courses.

    These materials are being created using central government funding, and are being added to regularly

  236. My solution by Sludge · · Score: 2
    How is it that Ask Slashdot ends up being so damn relevant so often? Just two weeks ago, I decided to get back into math.

    Anyway, I can't speak for someone who tackled Calculus, but I picked up a book called "Forgotten Algebra", which starts off really light, and ends up somewhere between where my grade 11 and 12 years left off. I take a commuter train to work and back, which gives me an hour and a half of math joy, and I manage to plug in a couple hours on the weekend.

    So far, it's been a very rewarding break from all those programming books I've been cramming into my head. I plan on taking on some trig next.

    I'm a self taught geek, and my strongest means of learning has always been books. I thought math might be an exception, and it may be at a higher level, but so far it's worked out excellently for myself. I can't wait to go in to work tomorrow and do more.

  237. Educational Web Sites by zanzar · · Score: 1

    There is a lot of good educational material on the web. Take Project Links for example.

    --
    ...These aren't the droids you're looking for....Move along....
  238. Teach someone else by jjr · · Score: 2

    I found when I teac someoen else anything I learn it better than the person I am teaching. I learn at least three programming languages. This way I did it in all my math courses when I sit down and try to explain something to someone it sticks better in my mind. Also find someone who is willing to teach you what you cannot understand on your own.
    Have fun

  239. A bit pricey: Entertainment vs. Enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much did your computer cost? How much did you spend on the TV, DVD, tunner, speakers, game console... add that up see what pricey is.

    Entertainment vs. Enlightenment
    Granted some basic needs are pricey... if you trully do enjoy math again why not save up some of the money you would save on entertainment and spend that on a class... you enjoy yourself, learn, and inspire all at the same time. That trully is priceless.

  240. One Word: Apostol by Ezubaric · · Score: 2


    For linear algebra, calculus, etc. It's the only way to go. Every problem has integer eigenvalues, the proofs are hard but doable, and it is just about as rigorous as you can get.

    It's more important than the bible.

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
  241. recommended reading by WaterSnake · · Score: 1

    Mathematics for the Nonmathematician by Morris Kline (ISBN 0-486-24823-2, QA37.2K6 1985).

  242. Bloom's Taxonomy by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2

    Stealing your daughters' textbooks is almost what you want to do. Sit down with (one of) them and ask them what they're doing. Ask them to teach you. It'll be a wonderful learning experience for both you and your daughter(s).

    Precisely. There's a taxonomy of understanding called Bloom's Taxonomy:

    Knowledge
    Comprehension
    Application
    Analysis
    Synthesis
    Evaluation

    It progresses from Knowledge to Evaluation. Most students really only learn to the knowledge level in class. They memorize for an exam, and that's about it. But anyone who really knows what they are doing has achieved all of these levels of abstraction of understanding.

    By working with your daughters and having them teach you, they'll progress to comprehension, they'll have to. You can continue to work with them, and challenge them to show you how things are done - advancing both of your understanding.

    And you can do this at almost any age. I challenge my son to explain how he makes certain things out of Legos. He's 4. And he's good at it. And every time he explains how he build a bridge or a car or something, he gets better at it. Sometimes he did something clever, but didn't realize why it was clever until the explanation happens.

    It's a good trick in a knowledge workplace as well. Have employees or teams explain what they are doing, how they solved a problem, or addressed a challenge to the larger community. Not only will it build the community and help everyone understand the whole widget, but the presenters will learn a great deal more about what they did and why though the presentation.

  243. To what end? by supermoose · · Score: 1

    After reading through the comments, I am seeing a lot of emphasis being put on stuff like calculus (or mulitvariate calculus.. or vector caculus =) ). If you are just looking to broaden your horizons a bit, I would probably steer clear of the applied maths and give pure math a look, especially if you've never been exposed to it. Most good introductory books will be self-contained enough that you don't need any other background, and the material that they cover will be miles removed from what you covered in other highschool or college courses.

    I'd really recommend you check out some graph theory. It's pretty, it's pretty easy to grasp, it's got some suprising applications, and it's quite different from the usual calculus-type fare. You'll also get a nice introduction to techniques for proving things, which can be fun. Other interesting choices might be number theory, analysis, combinatorics... the list goes on. Give it a try!

  244. I did this two years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I paid my $375 and went back to university. It was a lot of work, a lot more fun and I discovered discrete mathematics for the first time in my life. Discrete mathematics made sense in a way that other maths didn't and I abandoned my studies (which I was only doing for fun and vanity anyway) to see where the discrete maths led. It is still leading and it is even more interesting now.

    Currently I am playing with base 7 and base 60 which is something that you won't learn at university, LOL. (If anyone has any ideas on how to represent base 60 in a java applet calculator using a standard US English keyboard then I would love to hear your ideas, contact me at gilroy@ozemail.com.au).

    Anyway, do maths for fun and you will have fun. Do maths for work and it will be the pain that it was when you were at school. I mean maths has always been easy for me but this is the first time in my life that I have enjoyed it.

  245. Interesting book... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can reccomend a "pop science" book that's
    very good at re-awakening interest in pure
    maths (and cryptography).

    Its called "In Code", its a true story
    of an Irish girl (Sara

  246. Interesting book (2)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oops, I think I posted an incomplete text by mistake

    I can reccomend a "pop science" book that's very good at re-awakening interest in pure maths (and cryptography).

    Its called "In Code", its a true story of an Irish girl (Sara Flannery) who won a prize at a science fair, and then got hit with a mountain of publicity. She got paid to write a book, and with her father included an execelent primer in the maths of modern crypto (prime numbers and all that).

    It had my head spinning for about 2 weeks ;)

    In Code
    A Mathematical Journey
    ISBN 1 86197 271 7
    by Sarah Flannery, with David Flannery

    hope this helps

  247. bitting the bullet by sireenmalik · · Score: 1

    just a month ago i was pondering over the same question..
    and finally realized that there is/was no short cut!

    There are so many new things on the block, since i left
    university a decade ago, that honestly i felt i was
    probably mathematically handicapped! But just after
    a month i am beginning to get comfortable.

    There are some lessons i have learnt on the way. The first
    is to to go slow: take a problem at a time and try to solve it by the earlier
    learnt methods. Then run a simple query on internet
    for the scope of your problem.. you will find many
    phd thesis, technical reports, and often tutorials
    on the topic. From the results pick out 5 or 6 most
    frequently applied NEW methods and then start getting
    deeper into them. I generally start with looking
    for a comparison study on the selected methods which
    in my opinion is very useful. This initial research tells me
    of what the hell has happened in last
    ten years :) Another important thing that i have learnt
    is that most new methods are relatively more "user-friendly"
    than the ones we had in earlier times. The visualization
    and application of the new(er) methods is better.
    Lastly, do not waste time on mathematical equations until you know
    exactly the concept that goes behind them. I mean ..
    the concept behind Wavelet Transforms
    is more elegant and beautiful than the mathematical
    mumbo-jumbo that explain it with equations!

    my two cents.

    --


    Voltaire: God is dead.
    God: Voltaire is dead!
  248. Math jokes by haeger · · Score: 2

    A mathematician, a physicist, an engineer went again to the races and laid their money down. Commiserating in the bar after the race, the engineer says, "I don't understand why I lost all my money. I measured all the horses and calculated their strength and mechanical advantage and figured out how fast they could run..."
    The physicist interrupted him: "...but you didn't take individual variations into account. I did a statistical analysis of their previous performances and bet on the horses with the highest probability of winning..."
    "...so if you're so hot why are you broke?" asked the engineer. But before the argument can grow, the mathematician takes out his pipe and they get a glimpse of his well-fattened wallet. Obviously here was a man who knows something about horses. They both demanded to know his secret.
    "Well," he says, "first I assumed all the horses were identical and spherical..."

    An chemist, a physicist, and a mathematician are stranded on an island when a can of food rools ashore. The chemist and the physicist comes up with many ingenious ways to open the can. Then suddenly the mathematician gets a bright idea: "Assume we have a can opener ..."

    A mathematician is asked to design a table. He first designs a table with no legs. Then he designs a table with infinitely many legs. He spend the rest of his life generalizing the results for the table with N legs (where N is not necessarily a natural number).

    A Mathematician (M) and an Engineer (E) attend a lecture by a Physicist. The topic concerns Kulza-Klein theories involving physical processes that occur in spaces with dimensions of 9, 12 and even higher. The M is sitting, clearly enjoying the lecture, while the E is frowning and looking generally confused and puzzled. By the end the E has a terrible headache. At the end, the M comments about the wonderful lecture.
    E: "How do you understand this stuff?"
    M: "I just visualize the process"
    E: "How can you POSSIBLY visualize something that occurs in 9-dimensional space?"
    M: "Easy, first visualize it in N-dimensional space, then let N go to 9"

    A mathematician, an engineer, and a chemist were walking down the road when they saw a pile of cans of beer. Unfortunately, they were the old-fashioned cans that do not have the tab at the top. One of them proposed that they split up and find can openers. The chemist went to his lab and concocted a magical chemical that dissolves the can top in an instant and evaporates the next instant so that the beer inside is not affected. The engineer went to his workshop and created a new HyperOpener that can open 25 cans per second.
    They went back to the pile with their inventions and found the mathematician finishing the last can of beer. "How did you manage that?" they asked in astonishment. The mathematician answered, "Oh, well, I assumed they were open and went from there."

    Mathematician U. was a great friend of his five-year old grandson. They discused everything including math and U. was very proud of the boys math talents. The child went to kindergarden; In two weeks the he ask U.to help with the difficult math problem: "There are four airplanes flying, then two more airplanes join them. How many airplanes are flying now? U. was very disappointed by the simplicity of the problem. "What confuses you?" he asked. The child says: " I know, of course, that 4 + 2 =6, but I cannot figure out what the airplanes have do with this!"

    These days, even the most pure and abstract mathematics is in danger to be applied.

    "The number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again."

    The shortest math joke: let epsilon be 0

    A Neanderthal child rode to school with a boy from Hamilton. When his mother found out she said, "What did I tell you? If you commute with a Hamiltonian you'll never evolve!"

    How many topologists does it take to screw in a lightbulb??
    Just one. But what will you do with the doughnut?

    Q: What's the contour integral around Western Europe?
    A: Zero, because all the Poles are in Eastern Europe!
    Addendum: Actually, there ARE some Poles in Western Europe, but they are removable!

    Noah's Ark lands after The Flood and Noah releases all the animals, saying, "Go forth and multiply." Several months pass and Noah decides to check up on the animals. All are doing fine except a pair of snakes. "What's the problem?" asks Noah. "Cut down some trees and let us live there," say the snakes. Noah follows their advice. Several more weeks pass and Noah checks up on the snakes again. He sees lots of little snakes; everybody is happy. Noah says, "So tell me how the trees helped." "Certainly," reply the snakes. "We're adders, and we need logs to multiply."

    Q: What's a polar bear?
    A: A rectangular bear after a coordinate transform.

    I'm sorry, I just couldn't help myself. .haeger

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
  249. Some More Book Ideas by philwise · · Score: 1

    The Pleasures of Counting -- T. W. Korner (CUP) is great if you want a light read.
    If want to learn more (but enjoy the read less) try Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering -- Kenneth Franklin Riley, et al (also CUP.) It is known as Riley-Hobson-Bence and is very good.

  250. Go buy John Allen Paulos' Books by Kibo · · Score: 2

    It's almost too bad that I saw this so late. Given how much the math books of John Allen Paulos have entertained me. I really could have done some good karma whoring.

    Many of them are about the bastardization of statistics, others not. My favorite is Mathmatics and Humor, short, interesting. Most are similar in that respect and pretty much all of them are written for the layman who doesn't have time for homework. All the ones I have were easy, quick, reads. And some of them I even paid full price for (normally I just pick up interesting looking stuff from half price books).

    Most things have a qualitative and a quantitative aspect, the difference between how and how much. Math really isn't any different.

    In that way, math with history might intersect with the history of Pi, and the solution of Fermat's Last Theorem (Unlocking the Secret of an Acient Mathmatical Problem, by Amir D. Aczel), both of which have been turned into interesting books.

    But why math? Physics can certainly have a similar bent. And there are quite a few books that seek to explain the mysteries of quantum mechanics, and relativity in simpler, less rigorous, and less tedious, terms. Many of them aren't even written by kooks! To say nothing of those books that cronicle some of the more interesting discoveries that are crying to be made into a Nova special if not an actual movie. The book about the COBE experiment, I think it was called First Light, comes to mind. The personal drama is engaging enough to keep someone interested even if one finds the science, impenetrable, which I would think unlikly.

    For whatever reason I dislike the vast majority of fiction, so I browse at Half Price Books and buy $30 or so of math and science books.

    But it's all about what one hopes to gain. I don't hope to build a supercollider in my back yard, even if I could afford it and the DOE would sign off on it (and they might!). I seek more illumination about the world, and larger universe I get to live in, that, I can get from a book.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  251. Beautiful Mind Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    After only doing mathematics in high school level and in my first year of University, I've suddenly developed an interest in mathematics. [...] Does anyone have any advice or good resources?

    If the symptoms persist after 48 hours, go and see your doctor.

  252. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. (OT) by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

    Your analogy is flawed. What the university is supplying, what students find so valuable, is a guarantee to potential employers that you have a certain skill set. Sure, you could go to each and every class, learn all the same material as everyone else, but if all an interviewer had was your word that you know all that, you wouldn't likely get the job, or perhaps not be paid as much.

    To bring this back to your analogy, a pirated CD is usually an exact copy of the original. For a pirate, there's little chance that it's faulty and little to lose if it is. However, if an employer is going to pay you a hefty salary for things you only claim to know, he's at tremendous risk of loss if you're incompetent. Thus, the employer pays more to individuals who have a degree to back up their resume, and this extra bonus is incentive for students to pay the university.

    It's more like a large company deploying software across a thousand machines. They need to know it's going to work, so they need a support relationship with the manufacturer. Here, they're selling what the university is selling: a guarantee of performance, rather than just pure IP.

  253. Open University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if this is avaialable in the States, but in the UK we have the Open University. This is a government funded distance learning initiative which goes back to the 70's. It is very __good__, no, bloody excellent, actually. It may well be available in the States, it seems to be available in virtually every other country of the world. Try http://www.open.ac.uk. The do every kind of math. I am currently doing a Computing and Math degree, on a 2nd level course, having just finished some group theory (excellent), moving into Kleinian Geometry (daunting!). This is intro, so they ain't messing about. However, you can get courses at every level; from simpleton to master.

    Cheers,

    Doug

  254. renewed interest in Maths by ozymandius · · Score: 1

    Try out the BBC online lerning site for Maths revision, its good fun, well presented and reasonably complete:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/asguru/maths/

    Best of luck!

  255. Go by that Wolfram book. by zby · · Score: 1

    It is the New Kind of Math - why bother about the old one?

  256. Try the GMAT test - it comes with Math tutorial by cheros · · Score: 1

    Look at www.gmat.org, you can download a sample GMAT test which includes a tutorial to get you up to speed on the GMAT required maths (Windows only, sorry). It's a good start - and free...

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  257. Thank goodness my mom did not read this by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2

    She went back to evening school, got a Masters degree all while taking care of 3 children (with the help of my dad of course).

    A lot of work? Yeah.

    A good excuse? Bollocks.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  258. Re:Where are you going with it? (Frank answering) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I forgot my nickname and password. I am in exactly the same situation - I am 39 and I discovered a while ago that I was quite good at math and physics. (I live in England, but used to live in San Francisco). I did some math on my own, did a calculus course at Berkeley in the evenings (Hi Mr. Durban!) and fell in love with it.

    Now I am starting a physics BSc in fall. I thought about maths, but I thought 1 math graduate (my wife) in the family is enough.

    I will try to go into academia as well. I am getting tired of the "free market".

    if you wanna talk, I am always up to talk about math for late bloomers:) polar_beauty@yahoo.com

    -Frank

  259. Tip: Don't do it alone by smaughster · · Score: 2
    The one tip I can give you: don't try restarting with math on your own. The first year at my university had two main objectives: 1) to give everyone a basis math background and 2) to give everyone a toolset of math techniques for building proofs and tackling problems. These above points are *not* the same as a') "reading all the basis math books/theorems" and b') "reading what different techniques for proving exist", although a lot of the suggestions on this board seem to suggest that reading books is sufficient.

    To get a good intuition, it is necessary to develop your own math images in your head and to test them against other people and to see how they see/visualize the same theorem. In time, this will vastly expand your toolbelt of techniques and your intuition. If you read one book, you will certainly miss out on conversations with other math enthusiast and will miss the additional input. A small example: I was once in a class where everyone was challenged to present a proof of pythagoras theorem of "a^2+b^2=c^2". I think I saw 7 or 8 different proofs, while I came up with "only" 2 myself.

    Once you do have a solid math basis, then working and studying math in solo fashion is possible, although my own experience with complex function theory has taught me that you will learn more then twice as much from studying with other students then going solo.

    That said, I can advise the following books for introduction:
    • Vector calculus by Marsden en Tromba
    • Algebra by Hungerford
    • Elementary Topology by Munkres
    • Groups and symmetry by M. Armstrong
    Good luck
    --
    I intend to live forever, so far so good.
  260. Re:I had problems by tolan's+my+name · · Score: 3, Informative

    Firstly sorry I'm posting here, but I should like the original requestor to read this...

    Mathematics, at least pure mathematics, is more of a mindset that a knowledge set. It is incredibly hard to learn the mathematical way of thinking from books alone, that said once this mindset is acquired the books are the only thing you'll need.

    My advice would be to find yourself a mentor who's willing to assist you in acquiring this mindset, you'll probably be succesful asking around the various maths newsgroups.

    You need to be able to interact in real time with this person occasionally, but there is no reason not to do this over IM or IRC.

    As for what to learn / which books to read Calculus by Micheal Spivak is an excellent book, it brings in rigour gently and covers all of the main points of analysis. Covering its contents alone would set you up for a college / uni course, though you might also what to get a basic grip of [say] group theory and a very basic idea of sets [doesn't have to be above the venn diagram level]

    One word of warning do not let a physicist, on engineer or anyone else who 'thinks' they know maths teach you maths, find a mathematician

  261. Another silly fraction by Squeak · · Score: 1

    Another one is
    19
    ----
    95

    Cancelling out the nines works too.

    --
    This sig is a figment of your imagination.
    1. Re:Another silly fraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Got a general form I guess.
      Solve
      c = (10 * a * b)/(9*a+b)
      for a,b,c belongs to {1,2,....,9}
      then a,b,c will satisfy the following property
      (abbbb...../bbbb......c) = a/c (for any number of b's) where ab = a concat b and
      abb = a concat b concat b and so on.
      wrote a small program which generated the following numbers
      SLASHDOT: a = 1 b = 6 c = 4
      SLASHDOT: a = 1 b = 9 c = 5
      SLASHDOT: a = 2 b = 6 c = 5
      SLASHDOT: a = 4 b = 9 c = 8

      and their inverse will also have the property :)
      I guess its not just me who got a boring job:)

  262. Me too by Pedrito · · Score: 2

    My interest is actually in advanced physics, but that requires a pretty serious math background. I went to a local university bookstore and bought up some textbooks on calculus. I also bought books at my local bookstore on calculus, and topology.

    I study on my own. I use the internet as a resource, as there are quite a few sites that have tutorials on math.

    I tend to learn best on my own, if I have a source of asking questions. Again, the internet comes in handy there. Google Groups sci.math is also a good source for asking questions.

    If I feel I have what it takes, my goal is to go back and get a graduate degree in Physics, but it's hard to do when you have a full-time job and other responsibilities. I'll get as far as I can on my own first, though.

  263. Simple Solution by jdagius · · Score: 1

    No need to spend a lot on courses or fancy books. Just get the Harper-Collins "Dictionary of Mathematics" for about 10 bucks or so, virtually the entire corpus of mathematics laid out in very readable and digestible articles. It's equivalent a Master's Degree in Math, IMHO. If you're really interested in math, this should get you going. Also, find a guru who can mentor and answer questions.

  264. Morris Kline: Mathematics and the Natural World by jerdcox · · Score: 1

    Morris Kline has some really good mathbooks for people who don't know math that well. Mathematics and the Natural World was a great read for me back when I was in high school, and it is still interesting now that I have 3 semesters of calculus and some linear algebra and differential equations under my belt.
    He also has a book called Mathematics for the Non-Mathematician which I have not read, but based on the quality of his other books would probably be well written. He is one of those people that understands mathematics so well that he can explain it clearly to someone who doesn't know that much about it.
    If you are looking for formal math training for your job, this wouldn't be the resource for you. If what you are interested in is the beauty and fun of math and the way it describes the world around us, this is a great resource. You may find it is actually worth learning about math for its own sake.

  265. why... by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

    would you want to learn math again? if you don't need it for your job, what difference does it make? higher math is not that important unless you're an engineer or a math teacher. i don't see how anyone would have an "interest" in math as a "hobby".

    --
    please me, have no regrets.
  266. Great books by pathwayX · · Score: 1

    Try the two-book series by Louis Lyons called 'All you wanted to know about Mathematics (but were afraid to ask)'.

    It's a book geared towards science students, but to me at least, it's best damned Math book I've ever read. Why? Because it bridges the gap between disciplines. Mathematicians are often very theoretical-minded people. They have a hard time understanding that some people do not relate very well to theory, especially when all they need to know is how to apply that obscure theorem to get a practical result.

    Lyons' book puts everything into context. His writing style is pretty laid back and comfortable (especially considering that this is a book about...well. Math.)

    The two volumes together should give you a good, solid base to use math. Having that, I suggest following the other posters' advice and buying more specialized, more in-depth books that really get into the whys and hows. But I'm betting this kind of book will really help to get you started.

    --
    So long, and thanks for all the fish
  267. Read "Zero: the Biography of a Dangerous Idea" by Danyel · · Score: 1

    "Zero" will get you from basic math concepts up to understanding the math of black holes in short order and it's a small short paperback written by some math genius in laymans terms. I got my wife to read it after I was through and she actually said she thought it was good.

    There are a couple of other good one like that.
    "How Brains Work" easy reading
    "e: The Story of a Number" gets tricky but teach you the math
    "Pi: The Story of a Number" same as last one but I'm not sure if that's the right title
    "Where Math Comes From" shows that our math is not a universal truth and can really tell us nothing beyond what is in our brains already

    1. Re:Read "Zero: the Biography of a Dangerous Idea" by threadsafe_r · · Score: 1
      "Zero" is fun read I agree! You might also enjoy Peter Bernstein's, "Againts The Gods", though it has more to do with statistics and risk - but is none the less a fun read.

      Before tackling calculus, I would brush-up on algebra...

  268. Prof. E. McSqaured's Calculus Primer by inicom · · Score: 1

    For anyone interested in brushing up on calculus, I highly recommend Howard Swann's cartoon opus,
    "Professor E. McSquared's Calculus Primer"

    It is the best introduction to Calculus I've ever come across, and while many mathematicians know of the book and recommend it, it is rarely seen in bookstores.

    Unlike most calculus books which assume you already know calculus, Prof. E. McSquared assumes that you will have difficulty with calculus and patiently explains some of the difficult initial concepts.

    The best place to get it is from Dr. Howard Swann himself (who is at San Jose State University), via
    http://www.mathcs.sjsu.edu/faculty/swann/mcsqrd.ht ml

    --
    -a.e.mossberg
  269. The Friday Center for Continuing Ed at UNC by Bapu · · Score: 1

    I'm taking a series of Undergrad Math courses through the Friday Center for continuing ed at UNC. These are self study courses, but you have full access to a professor via email or phone if you need real help. They are quite affordable for in-state, and not too unreasonable out of state. Plus if you are in a technical position, and feeling creative you can probably get your company to pay for them if you make the argument that these are preparation to go for a masters in CS or some subject related to your job. Check out http://www.unc.edu and follow the links to the Friday Center.

  270. Re:Re-learning Beware Bad Text Books by ftns00 · · Score: 1

    Surely the textbook wasn't his only problem....

  271. Tried good books? by thaths · · Score: 1
    I recommend Mathematics: From the Birth of Numbers heartily. A most excellent book.

    Thaths

  272. Re:Re-learning Beware Bad Text Books by Prof_Dagoski · · Score: 2

    Don't give my roomate too bad a time. He was basically doing HS over again at community college after royally screwing up when he was younger. You gotta admire someone who realizes they made a mistake and actually goes out and tries to put things right. I know a lot of people who are content to just take easiest path down. This guy on the other hand was trying and succeeding at pulling himself out of the hole he was in. He was also working his butt off with two jobs and school at the same time.

  273. Re:I had problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    finally, after waiting all this time... We have it!

    YESS!!!! WE HAVE YAKISOYBA!!!!

  274. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by linzeal · · Score: 1

    When looking for books look at the used ones first. If the used version of the book you are looking for doesn't look "used" they were probably droll bullshit, find something that has a lot of copies that look like they went through hell and back.

  275. Re:Find a university. Show up. Have a seat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It depends on what he/she did for high school math. The person asking the question does not specify his/her mathematical background. High school math for some people is "algebra" and Euclidean geometry and possibly statistics. High school math for others is linear algebra, calculus, some abstract algebra, and more serious statistics.

    Schools vary widely in terms of cirriculum and standards in some places.

  276. You know Mira Costa Profs are better . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yet you don't actually go to UCSD? and you know the ENTIRE math dept. at UCSD drops acid. WOW, you're power is amazing.

    As with any place, there are some good profs, and some bad, this is true EVERYWHERE. That's why you ask other students which profs are good and which are bad, except sometimes they just rate profs as bad just because they failed. I remember one prof. I had everyone said he was horrible and was scared of taking is class. Turned out to be one of the best profs. I've had, he just demanded a lot so that you learn a lot.

    Besides, Community Colleges don't have a lot lot of choice past classes in the first two years in a degree course. For math, these means you can take Calculus, Differential Equations, and Linear Algebra. But what about Real Analysis, Partial Differential Equations, Number Theory, and Modern Algebra?

  277. Just don't blame it on his accent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear the accent blamed far too often. It's a lame excuse. I've been in the same lectures with the profs that have "incomprehensible" accents and done perfectly fine and understood every word spoken after a week. He may be a bad teacher, but PLEASE don't blame the accent. They're trying hard to speak a 2nd language, which a lot of those who complain don't do at all, so they have no understanding.

  278. i'm in the same boat... by bonezed · · Score: 1

    i left school at 15, went to technical college and studied various things including math and enjoyed it. But then i left to get a job...

    Now I am a sysadmin and doing well, but i find myself getting bored... I want to go back and study math, learn programming properly etc etc.

    i have some math textbooks from when i studying, should pull them out and relearn algebra etc

    --
    ---- Put Sig here:
  279. Re:Go away, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You learned Calculus in a few days?
    Wow.
    You are smart.
    Probably the smartest person who ever lived.

    Except that you're a clueless troll.
    Learn some manners, Einstein

  280. Solve Problems by ggrothendieck · · Score: 1

    To get good at math you need to do it yourself, that is, solve problems. Its only when you face the problems yourself that you really get an appreciation for it. My advice is to skip the classes and go to a good book and systematically go through it doing all the problems. I would recommend Kolmogorov and Fomin, Introductory Real Analysis. Kolmogorov is arguably the best mathematician of the 20th century and his book is a masterpiece. Amazingly, you can get this gem for only $10 in paperback. Spend as long as necessary to go through it thoroughly doing all the problems. You MUST do all the problems. Nothing less. Take a year or however long it takes you to do this. You won't be sorry. Another one (not an alternative but a second book to look at) is Halmos, Finite Dimensional Vector Spaces. Good luck.