Slashdot Mirror


When Spun Really Fast, CDs Explode

Anonymous Coward writes: "Ever wonder why cd-rom/cd-rw drives are not getting any faster? Wonder why they heat up? This page has a rather amusing experiment where they put various CD's into something that can spin up to 30,000RPM and found that most cd's explode at just around 28,000RPM. Oh and they seem to like using Corel CD-ROM discs for their experiment." Update: Yep, it's a dupe...

460 comments

  1. better way by xero_sign · · Score: 4, Funny

    I prefer to just microwave mine..

    --
    no soup for you
    1. Re:better way by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      The smell gets pretty bad after about 10 seconds or so... I don't think it can be any worse for you than secondhand smoke.

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    2. Re:better way by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      It's more fun to cut them up with industrial-strength scissors. Excercises the hands and gets little glittery bits of data everywhere.

      Either that, or sand-papering the paint off and using them as a coaster.

      Either way, the entertainment value lasts longer and there's less liklihood of zapping your microwave by mistake.

      -Sara

    3. Re:better way by 68K · · Score: 1

      Fine... if you like having cyanide gas in your kitchen.

    4. Re:better way by Callamon · · Score: 1
      I once ruined a craftsman rotary tool this way.. I stuck the CD on the spindle, spun it up to about 20K RPM, and and used a bit to take off the reflective backing. Ended up with so much conductive dust that it fried the motor of the tool.

      Luckily sears took it back and replaced it for me (I didn't tell them what I'd done.. so don't rat me out!)

  2. maybe if they uise REAL coral... by packeteer · · Score: 1

    ... the strong sponge shapoe would make them much stronger for their weight...

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  3. 52X by crayz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't those 52X ones have multiple read heads so they don't actually have to spin that fast?

    also you can always just put more data on the disk. I mean maybe you could never read a 100GB disk faster than 52X, but thats still like 100GB of data read in a minute or two

    1. Re:52X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, if you tried to read a 100 GB disc with a 52X speed drive that would take between 4 and 5 hours. Blazingly fast hard drives would still be around 30 minutes.

    2. Re:52X by packeteer · · Score: 2, Informative

      the "x" rating is not how many times faster it spins... its how many times faster it transfers data... some crappy 50x drives really do spin at 50x faster but the better ones have 2 or 4 heads to they really run at 25x the speed or 13x the speed(for 52x)... this is why u go for asus or toshiba or some good name brand company when you get a cdrom... bad position of holes makes it so my crappy 50x cdrom really can only read 3/4 of the discs...

      dvds are the same thing... a 1x dvd player is enough to stream the dvd onto a tv but a 8x/16x or whatever is better for ripping... a 8x dvd reader will actually transfer many times faster than an 8x cdrom becuase of the dvd format in which more data is read at the same time...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    3. Re:52X by jsse · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount;fsck;more;yes;unmou nt;sleep

      You forgot to kiss. You insensitive, inconsiderate bastard.

    4. Re:52X by balthan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You forgot to kiss. You insensitive, inconsiderate bastard.

      Most prostitutes don't allow you to kiss....err..or so I've been told.

    5. Re:52X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you stored 100GB of information on a cd, it would be 150 times more dense. thus you could read about sqrt(150) times more per revolution.

    6. Re:52X by packeteer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Do you really think if you just have your way with someone as soon as you get her clothes off and then fall asleep immediatly afterwards your going to be hearing about "i wanted you to kiss me"? ;)

      it's funny though that i have posted 333 comments and your the first one to point that out... maybe computer nerds ARE desensitized by nuke nukem...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    7. Re:52X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount;fsck;more;yes;unmou nt;sleep

      unmount ?

      you made that one up.

    8. Re:52X by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      should have been umount I guess??? hmm I bet there are plenty of systems that accept unmount as an alias for umount though.

    9. Re:52X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ln -s /bin/true blowjob

      doesnt make it a unix command though does it....

    10. Re:52X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol,

      Maybe you are being confused with what's called "access time" not "transfer rate"? Far as I know, data off the cd is read sequentially, meaning, to get more data off quickly, spin faster the cdrom. Having two heads and disk spinning at say, 2000 rpm will not read data faster. Two speed up the transfer rate, you just have to rotate it faster. However, if you have more than one head, access time required in searching particular data will be reduced.

    11. Re:52X by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      "dvds are the same thing... a 1x dvd player is enough to stream the dvd onto a tv but a 8x/16x or whatever is better for ripping... a 8x dvd reader will actually transfer many times faster than an 8x cdrom becuase of the dvd format in which more data is read at the same time..."

      The base 1z speed for DVDs is faster than the 1x speed for CDs. I don't know the exact numbers, but I think that's why DVD readers always have a much higher relative CD read speed than relative DVD read speed.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    12. Re:52X by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      52x times 200 RPM = 10,000 RPM. CDs self destructed at 25,000 RPM. So you're safe... as long as the disk isn't cracked.

    13. Re:52X by Callamon · · Score: 1
      to get more data off quickly, spin faster the cdrom
      Hey! Yoda is posting anonymously!!

      Actually though, you could get a faster throughput as well if you read different parts of the data with the different heads. So while one head is busy reading the first half of a file, the second head reads the second half simultaneously. Thus, double (minus overhead) the transfer rate.

      Access time may actually be faster or slower depending on how much overhead is involved and whether the drive actually tries to choose the closest head to the requested track.

  4. Pah! by popeydotcom · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should at least have chosen AOL CDs to destroy. Sheesh.

    Al.

    1. Re:Pah! by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

      Naw, they should have chose MSN and Windows ME install CDs. I swear they sold the ME discs as beta. :)

    2. Re:Pah! by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      Nah, AOL CD's are for shingling your roof, coasters (covered up with something else, of course), frisbees, etc... exploding them is a little too much respect for the horrible ISP!

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

  5. REPOST by GoRK · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    REPOst repost repost repost

    1. Re:REPOST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Instead of the moderators modding this offtopic they should have modded it Intelligent. Maybe if the moderators knew how to use the search engine we wouldn't have this problem. Or maybe Slashdot is just like normal news venues and just recycle material.

    2. Re:REPOST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOW IS THIS OFF TOPIC?

      it was a silly "news" story the first time it was posted.

    3. Re:REPOST by L1nUx+h4x0r · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not the moderators, it's the editors...

      Which makes one wonder what the hell we need them for if they can't edit a damned thing anyway...

      --
      The GPL makes software more like your mom. Free and open to all.
    4. Re:REPOST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful?

      Yeah, the moderators are dumb as dirt too...

  6. Why Corel CDSs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Corel CDSs? They should use all those AOL freebies...

  7. Exploding CDs? by kitzilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    A lot of bands might consider exploding CDs a feature. :-)

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    1. Re:Exploding CDs? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Maybe Celine Dion's publishers should condider this?

    2. Re:Exploding CDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I think 'exploding cds' is a perfect name for a band.

  8. Yet another "You have already covered this" reply by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Going to go ahead and be redundant and say that I saw this story somewhere else not too long ago... ...Oh yeah, it was here!

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  9. THE NEW RECORD! by Sir+Homer · · Score: 1

    Slashdotted in less then a minute!
    No need to hack a site to down it, just sumbit it in a story to slashdot.

    1. Re:THE NEW RECORD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in a bad mood. Sorry for trolling you...

      -- MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

  10. Hasn't this been posted in the past? by TheHouseMouse · · Score: 1

    'sall in the title.

    --
    Only the meek get pinched. The bold survive.
  11. AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by superx22x · · Score: 0

    A new way to dispose of those stupid AOL CD's that you get in the mail!

    But I wonder if you do this to a music CD, if the RIAA will sue you for destroying someones intelectual property...?

    Interesting Question

    1. Re:AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by vikkidog · · Score: 1

      No it's not ... it's a pathetic question

    2. Re:AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

      I was sort of sad when AOL switched to CDs. I liked the floppies. I was collecting them. I hoped to some day tile a bathroom with them.

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
    3. Re:AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      I never had to buy a 1.44M floppy for years... I just asked for AOL trial floppies a couple of times, and every month they'd sent me loads of free disks.

      It really sucked when I started getting about 3 CDs a month from them, though.

    4. Re:AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 1

      "...A new way to dispose of those stupid AOL CD's that you get in the mail!..."

      Why waste your time? "Return to Sender - Addressee unknown" takes care of most unwanted mail.

      (tig)

      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    5. Re:AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by Arcturax · · Score: 2

      Actually, I don't mind getting AOL CD's when they come in a nice DVD style case. I just tear all the crap off of it and, boom a case for my VCD's.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    6. Re:AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

      That is true, The cases are nice and will actually hold several CDs. Why buy a package of Jewel cases when you can grap a bunch of perfectly fine CD cases from the AOL display at the checkout?

      Clerk: Why are you taking all of those CDs?
      Me: I have lots of friends.
      Clerk: Oh. Can I be your friend?
      Me: No. Get your own CDs.

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
    7. Re:AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by Grassferry49 · · Score: 1

      I enjoy hitting up the local Sears they now have a AOL CD Case that is a clear thing plastic vs the big DVD black case. I've started a collection of AOL CD's (aol.bobtheking.com) with the hopes of collecting enough to send them to NoMoreAOLCDs.com so they can get their million CDs and water AOL's yard with them. If you want to get a ton of AOL CDs though with cases I'd have to say the best way to go is to find a disgruntled worker at one of the retail stores that provides AOL CDs with cases.

      --
      Visit BobtheKing.com it's perhaps the best thing I've ever made to waste your time with.
    8. Re:AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by AwenAnam · · Score: 1

      But think it over, with CDs you can create big solar mirrors with any kind of concave surface you can glue them to, then you can use the mirrors to generate electricity or fry your neighbor's dog.

    9. Re:AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      I'd rather melt them and make wierd sculptures.

    10. Re:AOL+RIAA - 2 Birds, 1 Stone by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

      SO that's what happened to my dog!

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
  12. now they know how to make hard drives explode... by yuri82 · · Score: 2, Funny

    just a post a link to it on slashdot and BOOM, there goes your hard drive...

    --
    Who is this Karma guy and why is he bad ??
  13. and hard drives? by DataPath · · Score: 1

    don't I remember hearing something about hard drive platters being spun so fast they either vibrate off the spindle and shoot off, or just shatter? I think it's a limitation of spinning just about anything fast enough.

    --
    Inconceivable!
    1. Re:and hard drives? by Kwikymart · · Score: 1

      "don't I remember hearing something about hard drive platters being spun so fast they either vibrate off the spindle and shoot off..."

      Oh, so that would explain those UFO sightings.

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    2. Re:and hard drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, that's a symptom of schizophrenia. To be treated with medication, or repeatedly hitting yourself in the head with a shovel.

      -- MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

    3. Re:and hard drives? by shepd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about that...

      I do know that I had some fun with an old 5 1/4" Full Height HDD and a 3-phase grinder once.

      Did you know that you can spin hard drives like that up fast enough (mostly safely) to actually make the centripetal force cause the drive to stand up on a corner for a bit! FUN FUN FUN! More fun than jumping off a moving bike to see how far it will go before it falls over (or hits something). Even more fun than trying to roll a quarter completely down the college hallway during late hours!

      (and no, even with the stress the grinder put on the platters and the high speeds nothing "exploded"... but someone did mention to me I should have worn protective gear anyways.)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:and hard drives? by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      i just wasted a few seconds of your meaningless life

      And that you did.....

    5. Re:and hard drives? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      The speed of sound is about 1130 (depends on temp) feet/second. a 5.25-inch disc's outer edge would be spinning at around 1282 feet/second - in excess of the speed of sound. I'm not well versed of the physics of the equation, but it seems that the disc's outer edge, having broken the speed of sound, would be the recipient of some extreme air pressure and turbulence that would cause the edges to break, and the uneven weight distribution would do the rest.

      Of course, I'm just taking a stab - could be wrong.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    6. Re:and hard drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      extreme air pressure in vacuum?

    7. Re:and hard drives? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      i heard a story that goes like this... if someone can find the original (dunno if i read it or someone told me) please reply with link... anyway

      "Way back in the day when the idea of a magnetic disc hard drive was fairly new the platter sized could get to be over 6 feet in diameter. These would get spinning very fast and because of their weight (hundreds of pounds) would carry quite a bit of momentum. One day a teacher decided to impress upon his student the power of this spinning disc and had it forcably clamped down. Of course if you know your laws of motion you might guess what happened. The disc lost quite a bit of spead so instead the rest of the computer started spinning... the computer spun like mad aroudn the room bashing into other cabinets and eventually slowing down spinning on the floor" i dont know if this is true or not but it sure seems like a good story to tell around the virtual campfire at a lan...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    8. Re:and hard drives? by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2

      Of course, I'm just taking a stab - could be wrong.

      Actually, because of centrifugal force and gyroscopic forces a spinning disk is inherently stable, and resistant to any turbulence or wobble. Likewise, the aerodynamic crossection of a hardrive platter is pretty negligle. Flywheels often spin at several times the speed of sound, often well over 60,000 rpm using disks measured in feet. Most operate in a vacuum condition, where there is nothing to turbulate. If a flywheel breaks vacuum suddenly the efffects might be catastrophic, The energy released during the failure of a 1 kW-h flywheel is enough to lift a mid-size car 100 feet into the air

      Could Jesus microwave a burrito so hot, that he himeself could not eat it? HS

    9. Re:and hard drives? by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

      Even more fun than trying to roll a quarter completely down the college hallway during late hours!

      I used to roll 5.25" hard disk platters down the hallway during late hours. They made a very satisfying BONG when they hit the wall at the end.

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
    10. Re:and hard drives? by f8xmulder · · Score: 1

      Pretty cool... Who knew Kevin Costner has a hand in the development of energy sources in this country!

    11. Re:and hard drives? by ninewands · · Score: 2

      Well, I suppose that you COULD spin a hard drive platter at high enough speed that it would fail catastrophically, but it's MUCH more likely with the 3.5 and 2.5 inch drives than the old 5.25 inch drives.

      The platters in 5.25 inch drives were aluminum, which is relatively soft and fairly ductile. I suspect that before the centrifugal force got high enough to cause the platter to fly apart, the spindle hole would stretch enough that the motor would no longer drive the platter ...

      The high strength materials used in the smaller drives would, IMHO, be MUCH more likey to hold together long enough to "explode."

      Just my US$0.02

    12. Re:and hard drives? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is more than an urban legend; many many years ago, I was working as a junior sysprog at a Burroughs B3700 site, where the vertically-mounted fixed-head hard disks were something like 3 feet in diameter. One of these came adrift from its bearing one day, and I saw the thing bust through the casing, a brick wall and continue sailing over a road, a sea-wall and into the sea. Could have killed someone...

    13. Re:and hard drives? by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      My friends were telling me about how the could make PDP harddrives walk by making the disk heads, "do the butterfly test"

      They discovered it accidentally when one "walked" off the stack and fell in front of the only door in...

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  14. Oh man the humanity of it! by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    Being /.'d twice in, what, the same year so far? Oooouch.

    (or did they just not ever come back from the last one)?

    oh well Google Cache still works. ;-D

    1. Re:Oh man the humanity of it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe CmdrTaco just doesn't like qedata.se very much, and likes using his audience as a quasi-legal DDoS.

      Or maybe chrisd and timothy don't talk much.

      But if we /.'d 'em again, that might say something for the attention span of the average /. user.

  15. slashdotted in _under_ a minute by Gis_Sat_Hack · · Score: 2

    I hope the server doesn't explode as well ...

    1. Re:slashdotted in _under_ a minute by Bitwit · · Score: 1

      No, it's still in one piece. Almost..
      It's 90mhz pentium with Linux and 32MB ram.
      Slow disks ant 10Mbit lan card.

      As you can understand the server can't stand the SlashDot effect...

      I'we talked to Jörgen and the exploding cd-pages will reappear on a new more powerful site soon.

      We are sorry for the inconvenience.... /BitWit

  16. the google cache by loomis · · Score: 1, Redundant

    http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:UaTCrUMQitYC: www.qedata.se/e_js_n-cdrom.htm+&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

    Loomis

    --
    "The television is the retina of the mind's eye" - Videodrome
    1. Re:the google cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google caches don't include the pictures, so going through the google cache will also hammer the original website as it tries to get the photos.

  17. has the web page exploded too? by rovingeyes · · Score: 1

    I cannot access the page seems even the page has spun out of control!

  18. Duplicate by Sircus · · Score: 5, Informative

    This story (with the same URL) was posted here. I know duplicate-URL checking wouldn't help everything, but it could at least catch stuff like this...

    --
    PenguiNet: the (shareware) Windows SSH client
    1. Re:Duplicate by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      This story (with the same URL) was [already] posted here [slashdot.org].

      Slashdot staff has appearently been spinning in their chairs so fast that their memories centrifigully left their container.

    2. Re:Duplicate by netnerd.caffinated · · Score: 1

      I picked this up too.

      I assumed that some code was changed in the matrix

      --


      You tried your best, & you failed miserably,
      The lesson is:
      Never Try
    3. Re:Duplicate by jsse · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to copy-n-paste high score comments from them for karma whoring. I earned my karma all the way up to max this way.

      (j/k)

    4. Re:Duplicate by cosyne · · Score: 2

      Well, so much for the 'slashdotting never strikes twice' theory....

    5. Re:Duplicate by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      When I read "Yep, it's a dupe", I thought it meant that the article was bogus (shor for duplicitous, as in "I've been duped!")

    6. Re:Duplicate by GC · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I wonder if you can get more Karma by plagiarizing the highest scored posts from the previous story...

    7. Re:Duplicate by Ashyukun · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to some engine repair reports I saw last year, weasels may not get sucked into jet engines, but coyotes apparently do...

    8. Re:Duplicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, was that "spinning in their chairs" or "spinning on their thumbs"?

    9. Re:Duplicate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to copy-n-paste high score comments from them for karma whoring. I earned my karma all the way up to max this way. (j/k)

  19. Quit humping the laser.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Maybe if they spun the laser it would be faster, since the disk seems to have more mass. Or better yet the spin the laser in the other direction of the disk so they are both spining.
    -James

    1. Re:Quit humping the laser.... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe if they spun the laser it would be faster, since the disk seems to have more mass. Or better yet the spin the laser in the other direction of the disk so they are both spining.

      There'd be no need to spin anything if you took CD drives to the ultimate extreme. Just integrate 700 million microscopic lasers onto a 4-inch wafer. Hold it next to the CD and, Bam! Read the entire disk in 10ns.

      Let's see-- that's about a 420,000,000,000-X drive. That's the kind of product spec that makes for a sure-fire winner in the marketplace. Might need to consider upgrading to a somewhat faster IDE interface version, though...

  20. Dupe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    In other news, VA Linux has found that when Slashdot Janitors are "spun-up" too quickly, they dont think enough before posting old news, and crap like this gets regurgitated.

  21. /.ed already... by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    Several minutes after it got posted, after 1am in the USA, only 6 comments so far, and I still can't get to the page. Sigh.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:/.ed already... by cetan · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you steal comments from http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/04/19/166228 &mode=thread&tid=137
      as the story has already been posted, and you'll be set!

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    2. Re:/.ed already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1AM in the USA or 1AM EDT? 1AM EDT means it was still only 10PM PDT. Try not to be time-zone-centric.

    3. Re:/.ed already... by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

      It said 1am on the article. I couldn't be bothered figuring out what part of the USA that applied to, as the front page didn't specify the time zone. It was mid afternoon for me.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  22. hmm.... by xero_sign · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah, it's pretty bad when fark.com gets stories weeks ahead of /.

    --
    no soup for you
  23. Happened to a friend by DarkDust · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what a friend observed, although at a lower speed of 20x, IIRC: he inserted a CD that had a small crack which he noticed but didn't worry about. The CD drive spun up and then *BANG* *crunch* *crackle* :-) He had to completely replace his CD drive. And that was already about two years ago... made him look at his CD's more carefully and not to ignore cracks ;-)

    1. Re:Happened to a friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had two CD-ROM's explode that didn't have cracks in them (Diablo I, and Diablo II's Play CD =P). The Diablo CD-ROM exploded in a friend's drive, so I don't know what speed it was. The (my) CD-ROM drive was a 52x for Diablo II. I posted on a message board I frequent about it, and it turns out it is a fairly frequent occurance.

    2. Re:Happened to a friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had something like that happen to me too. Put a UT disc in my CD-Rom Drive, went to read from the drive, and I heard this huge explosion like noise. Totaled the CD-Rom drive. That was the same day that I replaced that drive with a DVD Drive. :-)

    3. Re:Happened to a friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starcraft exploded in a friend's CD-ROM. Killed the CD drive and damaged his HDD.

      Blizzard sells crappy CDs.

  24. Ooh, new copy protection idea... by silverhalide · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see it now, the RIAA manufacturing discs that experience structural failure when you spin them faster than 1X to rip them....

    oh boy.

    Wonder what happens if you spin a floppy at 30,000 rpm? :-)

    1. Re:Ooh, new copy protection idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not so freaking crazy.. they'd probably have to build in some tolerances, so anything over 2x or even 4x would rip it apart.. dedicated people would still rip it.. but that'd take some sweet time..

    2. Re:Ooh, new copy protection idea... by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

      Shhhhhhhhhhhh! Don't give them b*stards any ideas!

      --

      Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

    3. Re:Ooh, new copy protection idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is that now all disks with "protected media" on them will now explode when spun faster then 1X? So, are we all moving back to generation 1 drives, or is there a way the disk can bust during spins faster then 1X while being ripped, but not with normal use? Doesn't make much sense.

    4. Re:Ooh, new copy protection idea... by jkirby · · Score: 1

      Try a Dremel. Mine spins at 30K

      --
      Jamey Kirby
    5. Re:Ooh, new copy protection idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wonder what happens if you spin a floppy at 30,000 rpm? :-)

      Ask Ron Jeremy, he's able to do it.

  25. Umm, this has been on Slashdot before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  26. 2002 - The Summer of Reruns by UTPinky · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/04/19/166228 &mode=thread&tid=137

    Too bads its been /.'ed twice in less than 6 monthes...

    --
    I'm only paranoid because everyone is against me...
  27. this is a repeat, big time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i don't know why i'm surprised.

  28. "Spinning" laser beams by Kruemelmo · · Score: 1

    I wonder when we will have CDROM/DVD/anything dirves which have "spinning" laser beams instead of the mechanical super fast stuff which is the weakest part in these drives. The disk would be in a fixed position. *That* should work at faster speeds.

    1. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That will also have significantly more wear and alignment problems so get used to replacing your drive on a regular basis.

    2. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1

      What about counter-rotating media and heads. The media spins in one direction as fast as it can, and the heads spin the other way as fast as they can. I gotta go patent that...

      But anyway wouldn't a stationary media/stationary laser like you're suggesting still require some sort of spinning mirror to position the beam?

    3. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      How would you power the laser? The cord would get tangled and snap. But if we find a way to do it, how about spin the cd one way, and the laser the other. Doubble the speed, in half the RPM.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    4. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Cord? That's the best you can come up with?

    5. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      You could use a ring that has a constant connection to the spinning arm it would spin around, but always remain in contact with the stationary ring.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    6. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The "ring" could work much like a phone cord detangler - bars at extend each to a different ring. The other problems you have here:

      Synchronization: Getting the laser at one spot on a CD is a complex process (so much so that a buffer underrun can cause a misalignment in a burnt CD, making coasters). If you spin the CD and the laser at different variable speeds, you would need some great hardware calculating that would be able to put the two speeds to gather as they vary.

      Communication: Getting power is pretty easy, but what about returning data? You could use the same spinning wire-on-ring system, but I think it would limit the communications bandwidth.

      I think a better system would be to have 2+ read heads on a CD-ROM. Two or four read heads could more quickly access data if they were fully independant. Drive access time could be halved, as could seek time. Two heads could "stripe" data, allowing the transfers to be even faster.

      Well, I'll stop.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    7. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • some sort of spinning mirror

      • No, you could use electro-optic prisms (which could operate at up to MICROWAVE frequencies, and are solid state). See Saleh and Teich, _Photonics_, p. 706. Detecting the reflected beam would be hard. Since you could scan in any arbitrary pattern there'd be no reason for compact 'discs' to be *discs* at all - they'd probably be square, and x-y scanned like a CRT.
    8. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by viking099 · · Score: 2

      All you would need to do is have a rotating mirror put on the axis of the spindle, and bounce the laser off the mirror. Only problem would be proper laser focus at the edges of the CDs.

      You can probably spin a mirror much faster than a CD disc or the laser itself...:-)

    9. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      They're called slip-rings, and they work quite well. you can transfer both power and data through them. I'm not familiar with current lifetimes on low cost components though...

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    10. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not use an electrom beam that could be focused to the correct spot on the cd using magnetic fields. much the same way a crt monitor works. no moving parts

    11. Re:"Spinning" laser beams by Matthaeus · · Score: 2

      Communication: Getting power is pretty easy, but what about returning data? You could use the same spinning wire-on-ring system, but I think it would limit the communications bandwidth.

      Unless you've got a uart or something similar on the spinning arm, the laser (or rather the component that receives the laser light) is only sending a bit of information at a time anyway. Look at the ribbon that connects a laser assembly to the main board on any cd player today. Only 4 traces. Power, Power Ground, Signal, and Signal Ground. 4 wire rings is done with phone cords today, so why can't it be done with this?

      That said, I think a spinning mirror (e.g. supermarket scanners) would be a lot simpler and still get the job done.

  29. More Explosions! by Inexile2002 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want to see more of this kind of story!

    I want to see what else can explode in my box. I want to see what happens (with big color pictures) to to a hard drive at 20000 atmospheres of pressure. I want to see ASUS vs ABit mobo's head to head for resisting g-forces. I want to see what happens when you force 100,000 volts through a cat-5 cable.

    Isn't this what the internet is all about, pictures of stuff exploding, videos of people endangering their lives for my tittlation while discovering what happens if you fill a case with gasoline and run it as a server. Get cracking people.

    1. Re:More Explosions! by kwishot · · Score: 4, Funny

      What happens when guys in IT departments get bored or "fed up" with hardware? Try hooking up common computer cables and connectors to 110vac for the purpose of destruction =) I especially like VGA killer and the "powered" hub!
      Check it out at http://www.fiftythree.org/etherkiller/ (I've actually had the honor of seeing these things up close, and they're every bit as cool as you'd think! =)

    2. Re:More Explosions! by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I can't give you 20,000 atmospheres, but I can give you a tank driving over a hard drive.

      http://homepage.cc/harddisk/

      Enjoy. Personally, I think it would be more fun if they used the main gun to "partition" the disk.

      --
      --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    3. Re:More Explosions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wanted to see a bucket of salt water dropped over a running box, preferably a high-end server with multiple power supplies and lots of CPUs...

    4. Re:More Explosions! by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I want to see what happens when you force 100,000 volts through a cat-5 cable.

      i cant tell you about 100,00 voles but I can tell you about what happens when you shove 2-4 million volts down a cat-3 cable that is 400 foot in length.

      I ran a cat-3 cable from my parent home to their deck in lake michigan for a telephone extension. I had aquired for them an old police call box, modified it to have the ability to be locked with a combination. (Jerks walking the Lake Michigan shoreline will happily make long distance or 1-900-nasty-sex calls on your phone for you if you dont.) so I ran some cheapo regular cat-3 wire out there for the 2 phone lines they have at the house and mounted a cheapo 2 line phone in the call box. (later changed it to a 2.4Ghz Cordless with custome antennas out the top... that's another story)

      WEll we had a lightning storm. and silly/stupid me didn't think of these things and GROUND things at the phone box end on the beach. so we had a direct hit to the tree next to the phone box... It did the following.. The cat 3 cable was completely vaporized for 20 feet. It was gone, nothing NADA, as if aliens came and beamed it to their mothership with charring effects. the rest of the cable length had interesting things done to it.. From the charred point to the house where the first ground point was available (outside) it was broken every 1 foot, the every 2 foot and os on until it was up to every 10 feet had a section broken/burned out.. on close look you could see exit wound pinholes near the break point as the voltage found a weak point and escaped. My only explination was that the voltage continued to drop as it made it's way toward the good ground (or the rest of the house) and this was what was causing the increase in distance between breaks/burnout points.

      Oh yeah, of the wires in the cat 3 cable... 4 were phone, 3 were alarm indicator from the house,1 for house is alarming, 1 for reporting to the house that someone opened the phone box wrong, and one was grounded at the house.

      The alarm was blown up.. completely it was dead, circuit board fried, I stuck a fork in it and handed it to the insurance man.

      3 of the 5 phones in the house were dead (electronic or cordless) the 2 old mechanical bell phones worked.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:More Explosions! by damiangerous · · Score: 2

      And if you go up to the parent directory of that site, you'll find another site, here, of someone shooting various bits of hardware with a .45.

    6. Re:More Explosions! by freaksta · · Score: 1

      If that's what you want then you need to go work for UL (underwriter labritories) the UL on the back of your computer means that this stuff has already been done ;)

      --


      Hrrm... I usually just sign my name.
    7. Re:More Explosions! by SirNAOF · · Score: 1

      They're not always cool...The SCSI version didn't do much on the last two trials...just tripped a breaker. Not nearly the effect we were hoping for.

      But there's always more drives to fry...

      --
      Jeremy Baumgartner
    8. Re:More Explosions! by gypsyx · · Score: 1
      Isn't this what the internet is all about [snip]

      No. The internet is all about porn. Although I think the story is great, it is important that the true nature of the internet is not obscured by it. Before the web... Before people connected their pee-cee's to the internet... Before there was Linux... Way before all of that, there was porn. Better porn. No-spam porn. Reading a.b.p.e. didn't involve sorting through spam and the damned AOL me-too'ers.

      Man, I miss the old internet.

    9. Re:More Explosions! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

      How about some sulphuric acid? I bet the poison clouds would be more impressive than those in Deus Ex.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    10. Re:More Explosions! by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 2

      I assume that most /.ers know about the liquid oxygen in the barbeque bit, but in case you don't, check out http://ghg.ecn.purdue.edu/~ghg. This site has an MPEG file of the meltdown.

    11. Re:More Explosions! by rawg · · Score: 1


      And this is what happened to my Mac monitor:

      Ouch

      Note: Guns don't hurt computers. People do.

      --
      The above is not worth reading.
    12. Re:More Explosions! by antirename · · Score: 1

      I tried shooting at an old 486 with special low-noise rounds I made. The idea was to rig the computer with small charges made from firecrackers, and simultaneously detonate the charges and a set of strobe lights in a dark room using the noise of the gunshot. (The camera's shutter was held open). The idea worked, but the monitor held together better than I thought it would. Although the girl at radio shack didn't believe me when I told her what the SCRs were for until I showed her the pictures. Apparantly not too many people buy those :)

    13. Re:More Explosions! by teece · · Score: 1

      Cool story (of course, lucky you weren't on
      phone when that bolt came, you'd be dead).

      But for posterity: VOLTS don't go anwhere, volts
      aren't dangerous. Voltage is just the electric
      potential difference between two points. The
      thing that you mean to talk about is *current*
      (measured in Amps). That is the actual amount of
      charge down the wire. That is what will kill you.

      --
      -- Hello_World.c: 17 Errors, 31 Warnings
    14. Re:More Explosions! by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      but volts do mean something.. you have to exceed the voltage blocking potential of any insulation to defeat it (the punch through) if I have a wire carrying 1 volt but at 90 bajillion amps it will never arc across the insulation to an available ground... but if I have 90 bajillion volts at 0.0001 amps it will gladly penetrate or go around whatever insulation I have.

      The volts are also what killed the alarm panel.. If the incoming voltage never exceeded the system's design parameters it would not have arced across the board from the entry point to the groundplane and thereby burning the groundplane out of existance (that's where the amps came in.)
      but would have instead only blew the protection fuses.

      Volts, that electrical potential is what did the damage.. as the volts paved the path for the amps to do their dirty work by creating that nice potential to exceed the insulation's abilities and create that nice easy path for the amps to travel.

      On a side note, this expierience did get me interested in ultra-high voltages.. I built my first tesla coil 2 months after that and promptly destroyed a small portable radio and a VIC-20 that was sitting near it when I activated the unit.... never assume that 3 feet of air space is enough insulation for 50,000 volts.... oops!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  30. Spelling.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's vinyl, not vynil :)

  31. Re:oops by loomis · · Score: 1

    http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:UaTCrUMQitYC: www.qedata.se/e_js_n-cdrom.htm+&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

    --
    "The television is the retina of the mind's eye" - Videodrome
  32. i call rehash by freaq · · Score: 1

    namely, Establishing the Maximum Speed of a CD-ROM Drive on 19 april
    c'mon, chrisd, is it too much to look over michaels's shoulder once in a while, or search the /. archives?
    --
    cecil was wondering, so we set up a poll. what do you think?

    --
    united states nuclear device terrorist bioweapon encryption cocaine korea syria iran iraq columbia cuba
    1. Re:i call rehash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call rehash on your rehash!

    2. Re:i call rehash by caferace · · Score: 2
      I'd make a really crude joke about chrisd looking over michaels shoulder a lot (nudge nudge, wink wink) but that would blow my karma to hell.

      Suffice it to say that this is indeed a repeat. An amusing one, true.

  33. The holes in CD's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are only good for one thing...

    -= MASTURBATION =-

    P.S. Obey me mother fuckers!

    1. Re:The holes in CD's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they aren't, the hole is too small, and it srheds up your cock.

  34. from the anarchist's-cookbook dept. by altaic · · Score: 1

    A while ago, there was a rumor among the folk who make nasty treats like disk bombs that one could do a similar thing with CDs. It ended up just being a product of an accident, as so many destructive things are. If you crack a CD and put it in one of the new high speed readers (or my bloody noisy plextor cd burner), the cd with fly apart and make horrible sounds, not to mention possibly break all kinds of things inside your drive.

  35. Re:now they know how to make hard drives explode.. by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1

    just post a link to it on slashdot and BOOM there goes your money.

  36. Bannage target? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh great. Now CD players will be banned from planes.

    1. Re:Bannage target? by Cardhore · · Score: 2

      Yes, because we all know every portable CD player is capable of spinning discs at 40x.

    2. Re:Bannage target? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40x doesn't mean 30,000 RPM.

    3. Re:Bannage target? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      actually I agree. you are correct CDs could be dangerous. lets lets look closely at what it will take to make our skies secure:

      I think we should ban hands because we can choke the stewardesses. cut em off or chain em down.

      I think we should ban long sleeve shirts. A sleeve can be used to choke too. I could easily choke someone with a cotton sleeve.

      I think we should ban toothbrushes. they could easily be rounded to a point and used to poke holes in the jugular.

      hard sole shoes are also a no no. you could knock someone out with a really hard sole.

      paper is a big risk too. with lots of paper, and the one allowed lighter (now) it's pretty easy to start a big fire on a plane. then everyone is fscked.

      they have absolutely NO idea if my shampoo is flammable or volatile.

      nix those headsets they hand out. those have to go. a wire cord could easily tie the (still live, but squirming) hostages.

      I often travel with wire coat hangars. a nice titanium hangar with a sharp point could easily stab someone in the heart, the eye or the genital.

      feet are nasty weapons too. I once saw a Korean kick-boxer break another mans leg with a single kick. I think it was a video on the Internet. clearly a terrorist risk.

      I had a friend named Kip who weighed about 380 pounds and subsisted entirely on canned cheese, hotdogs and pizza. he could fart so much that people literally passed out. fat farters are no longer allowed. (unless they buy two seats).

      my grandfather had a key that was actually a screwdriver on the end. prisoners sharpen keys and kill each other often. I guess we can't have keys with us any more.

      4 laptop batteries if modified and connected in series, put passed through a step up voltage transformer, could produce a shock large enough to (with high probability) produce a heart attack. no more batteries which means no more laptops.

      carry-on suitcase are never weighed. I've carried a carry on with a 28 volume set of encyclopedias which weighed close to 130 pounds. a big arsh terrorist with a 130 pound carry-on over your head in cramped quarters == not your friend. no more heavy bags.

      this doesn't even talk about the UNBELIEVABLE TWENTY-FIVE PERCENT failure rate at catching fake guns, bombs, knives, chemical maloderants, and other dangerous stuff passed through security. In the future we will have only 3 passengers per plane to reduce this risk.

      belts are nasty. people kill themselves all the time with belts. shoelaces too. when I was in jail in Houston nobody had belts or shoelaces. and nobody died! dress ties fall into this category too. I guess it's low riders, no ties, and sandals for everyone!

      I recently transported a piece of lead crystal in my carry on. drove the security people bonko. made me EMPTY the whole suitcase. couldn't see through it on xray. I also had a set on 1950's glasses that belonged to my grandfather, each wrapped in paper. they didn't care I had 12 1-lb breakable projectiles that could be heaved or tubing shot at high speed through the cabin -- let alone a 6 pound chunk of lead crystal. nothing heavy AND nothing breakable. (security screens don't see surgical tubing as a threat).

      see that aluminum mag light he has in his ha*WACK* *omg, the floor is approaching my face really fast*

      head butt, elbows, body check, high falls, knee in the groin, the face? "I'm sorry sir if the chains and shackles are tight, but we'll be landing soon. It's for your own good."

      I'd bet a food cart full of books pushed by the expanding gases from oxygen canisters would blow right through a reinforced cabin door.

      I wonder if they can tell the steel shanks in my packed boots are actually removable and cut into strips and sharpened into knife blades. I'd bet not.

      The list could go on and on and on and on and on

      _______________________________________

      THE POINT:

      SO... TO MAKE OUR SKIES SAFE: only 3 at a time, naked and with hand and feet chained fast to your seat; nothing else in tow. that would about do it.

      PEOPLE CANNOT CONTROL EVERYTHING. IT IS A BIG LIE TO OURSELVES THAT AIRPLANES ARE SAFE. THE MORE WE SQUEEZE, THE MORE SLIPS THROUGH OUR FINGERS. ... OR for you geeks out there, for your delta, I can always find a more dangerous epsilon.

      MAYBE, WE SHOULD CREATE A WORLD WHERE PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO KILL US.

      -

      I really really did not want to post this anonymously. I don't want the hassle of some ignorant fsck from law enforcement to think I would actually do any of this and come give me static. I won't. But given the way we all act, there are those who will.

    4. Re:Bannage target? by md17 · · Score: 1

      only 3 at a time, naked and with hand and feet chained fast to your seat

      What kind of hotel is this?

      So on a serious note, does anyone have any good ideas about how to make our air travel more safe or will there always be risk associated with flying?

    5. Re:Bannage target? by ffatTony · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      The obvious, although impractical solution, is to find out why people want to destroy a bloody plane they are currently flying sending everyone on board to a fiery death.

      Yes, I know the answer is 'Terrorists hate Americans', but why? If we are doing something to piss them off then stop it.

      Or we could just sedate all passengers before the trip. This would save $ (no more flight attendants, no more little peanuts)

      Also, anyone know why they bother with oxygen masks and seats that may be used a floatation devices? My understanding was that when a plane went down the death ratio was most likely very high.

    6. Re:Bannage target? by suss · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Oh great. Now CD players will be banned from planes.

      I doubt it. The RIAA has enough dough to buy Dubya, just like the tobacco industry did...

      What Does a 39-cent Bic Lighter Tell Us About the Bush War on Terrorism?

      Money is still worth more than lives.

    7. Re:Bannage target? by markmoss · · Score: 2

      And of course, everyone has to wait in line outside the terminal to be stripped and shackled. The terrorists just drive-by those long lines and machine gun hundreds of people at a time (and can get away and repeat indefinitely, which hasn't been the case in the recent attacks), but hey, nobody's getting hurt _inside_ the terminal and they're not responsible for what happens outside.

    8. Re:Bannage target? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually portable cd players and md players is banned from some airline companys.

    9. Re:Bannage target? by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 1

      only 3 at a time, naked and with hand and feet chained fast to your seat; nothing else in tow. that would about do it.

      Couldn't you hurt someone with the chains? Or the seat?

    10. Re:Bannage target? by lamz · · Score: 2

      Yes, I know the answer is 'Terrorists hate Americans', but why? If we are doing something to piss them off then stop it.

      Well, for one thing, our women have way too many rights and freedoms to suit them. Should we get the burkas out?

      Mmmmmmmmmm...appeasement.

      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  37. In other news..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It seems slashdot has uncovered the perfect Denial of service attack. The first step involves linking to the site on slashdot's homepage, then millions of unsuspecting geeks, click the link simultaneously, overloading the webserver. One geek was quoted as mumbling something about being a couple seconds to late to see all the l33t stuff the site was supposed to contain. Then the attack continues, by reposting the link in another story, a dupe so to speak, that ensnares even more geeks. But alas, when will this slashdotting criminals be brought to justice.

    1. Re:In other news..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PARENT +1 FUNNY

  38. Old news by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    This story was on Slashdot like 4-6 months ago (not sure of the date). I'd give you a link but Slashdot's search feature is just a placeholder for an actual working and useful search engine - as is the case on most websites these days.

  39. Re:oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is it so hard to post the link? Or is HTML too difficult for you?

  40. other ways of speeding things up by DdJ · · Score: 1

    So, has anyone tried to rig up something with a laser and a bunch of spinning mirrors, so that the disc can actually stay still while being read? It'd be a more complex mechanism, but it could go arbitrarily fast without stressing the CD at all.

  41. Technology marches on by Roosey · · Score: 1

    Boy, talk about your new and improved CD burners...

  42. Mirror by idiot900 · · Score: 2

    It's slashdotted; I've at least got the text mirrored; images added as I get them.

    http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/users/tom/mirrors/cde xp lode

  43. other ways to do this with normal CD drives... by H3XA · · Score: 2, Funny

    Find yourself an old 40x (or so) drive that you no longer need and get ready for some fun (tested on tray load drives only so far).

    Grab an AOL or old magazine CD and make a few small cracks (so they don't go into the data area) about 1cm long on the inner edge of the CD (aka the hole in the middle of the CD). Then put it in your high speed CD reader and start reading data - with luck after a minute or so (maybe longer) you will hear a loud BANG and the CD will no longer be spinning :)

    Sometimes you tray will eject still but more often than not you will have to take the drive out and shake the bits out. When you are shaking you may find other bits like the small CD laser lens and small pieces of metal - in which case you drive is probably fux0red now....

    I did this to my work PC drives.... old Diamond Data and Fujitsu drives that use to piff me off for various reasons :)

    You look around hardware review sites you will come across readers stories of similar experiences where the CD structural integrity has failed and tried to spread itself over the insides of the PC case.

    - HeXa

    1. Re:other ways to do this with normal CD drives... by Cardhore · · Score: 2

      Hard drives too. It's always funny when you open up the old deteriorating 15,000 rpms/sec hard drive and hard drive platter gets embedding into your skull. That's always a good laugh at thanksgiving or christmas time.

    2. Re:other ways to do this with normal CD drives... by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that is covered under Dell's "Complete Care" warranty that covers intentional damage?

    3. Re:other ways to do this with normal CD drives... by H3XA · · Score: 1

      thats the beauty of work computers...... very shitty clone based jobs put together by a incompetent outsourced supplier.....

      Feels great when you know you are putting crap hardware out of its misery.....

      I would never do that to my DELL notebook :)

      - HeXa

    4. Re:other ways to do this with normal CD drives... by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      I used to work at a small computer store and one day I was bored and the guy next to me had just fired up a customer's system after replacing some part. So I tossed a quarter on to the motherboard. I got 5 points! I hit something that made the system power down. He got mad at me and said "What the hell are you doing!? That's someone's computer!" I said "Relax...." and hit the power button and everything was back to normal. Nothing like a good old 430TX chipset. It really bounces back.

  44. cd speed by aliusblank · · Score: 1

    The real reason cd drives arent getting faster is because the demand dosent exist for cd rom drives! Look at the kenwood true
    72x drive... it used multiple read heads to obtain that speed. Where theres demand there is innovation. If everyone needed/wanted
    a 72x cd rom drive, Kenwood wouldntve stopped making them and other manufacturers would.

    1. Re:cd speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      There is also the issue that they never worked right, in that they always had problems with CDR and CDRW media.

  45. hmm by krypto246 · · Score: 1

    I suggest building drives with 8 read heads, all of which spin counter to the Cd at 25x, and the CD at 52x. Then we can burn disks faster then you can swap them in and out of the drive. And can we figure out a way to get my disks to pop up like toast when they're done burning?

    1. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you study the technology before munching your foot.

      There are no read heads in a CD drive. It's done with light....can you say 'laser'?

      And the Mac cube will pop up CD's just like a toaster. How gay can you get, wishing for something that's come and gone.

    2. Re:hmm by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

      Pop up like toast? Sure - buy an Apple G4 Cube :)

  46. CLV and CAV by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article talks about constant linear velocity (used in the original audio standard) and constant angular velocity drives. It comments how manufacturers like to have CAV drives to quote impressive speeds compared to the CD (audio) standard, but doesn't mention a much more important reason for using CAV: if you used CLV you'd need to wait for a long time (probably seconds) for the spin rate to change and stabalize whenever you seeked from one part of the disk to another.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  47. It depends on the age of the CD... by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Contrary to popular belief, plastic doesn't last forever.

    Since CD is made up of two layers of clear plastic, sandwitching a thin wafer of metal media inside, the more the CD is aged, the weaker the plastics of the CD become.

    And so, the maximum spinning speed for a CD depends on how old the CD is.

    I do have some pretty old CDs from the early 80's, and I will NOT put them in my 52X CDROM drive. Unless of course, I want to scrap bits and pieces out of my machine. :)

    --

    Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    1. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by canadian_right · · Score: 2
      Some of my very old audio CD's are quite a bit heaverier than the new ones which all seem to be the same weight. The plastic seems just a bit thicker, but quite a bit heavier. Heavier enough compared to a normal CD to notice when you pick it up.

      Anyone have info on changes in manufacturing od CD's over the years that might explain this?

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    2. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      Did you know that you can reduce the maximum speed of your cdrom drive?

      http://www.dvs.co.kr/support/driver/Maxspeed.zip

    3. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2

      Did you know that you can reduce the maximum speed of your cdrom drive?

      Nero Burning Rom comes with utility to change the speed too.

    4. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anyone have info on changes in manufacturing od CD's over the years that might explain this?

      Well of course, the newer it is the crappier LOL... like in the Simpsons episode where Bart meets Buck McCoy:

      Bart: "What's this lunch box made of?" ::tap tap tap::

      Buck: "Oh, back in our day, we had a thing called metal!"

      Bart: "Me-tal... hmmmm..."

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    5. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Metal lunch boxes are much more effective for hitting bullies in the groin with as well.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just makes them mad. Everybody knows that they bully smaller kids to make them feel better about their tiny genitalia.

    7. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence: the term "Next motherfuckers gonna get my metal"

    8. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by Explo · · Score: 2

      On Linux, suitably new version of hdparm should do the trick with switch -E.

      --
      Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.
    9. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by noodle-of-moria · · Score: 1
      I work at a smallish security software firm. Until about a year ago we had terrible problems with exploding CDs, cracked CDs, etc--that were brand new. The Logistics guy blamed shipping methods, even after I demonstrated that I could break the CDs into 2 inch pieces barehanded, with minimal effort--and so could he.

      Interestingly, good quality R-CDs were pretty tough, and AOL CDs were practically indestructable :( I think the quality of the plastic makes a huge difference.

    10. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I do have some pretty old CDs from the early 80's,
      Wasn't the CD invented in the mid-to-late 80s?
    11. Re:It depends on the age of the CD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. CD's were prorotyped in 1978, and first released in 1982.

  48. Spin laser instead? by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 2
    I'll ask the same question I asked in response to Hot-Rod Your CD-RW Drive:

    Would it be possible to leave the CD stationary, and spin the laser instead?

    1. Re:Spin laser instead? by Myco · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, it's a little-known fact that all CD-ROMs do keep the CD stationary, and simply spin the rest of the universe around it. True fact. ;)

    2. Re:Spin laser instead? by cybermage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, it's a little-known fact that all CD-ROMs do keep the CD stationary, and simply spin the rest of the universe around it. True fact. ;)

      Yeah, right. Next you're gonna tell me that CDs are flat and if you read too far you'll fall off the edge.

    3. Re:Spin laser instead? by zapfie · · Score: 1

      Does relativity apply to spinning objects?

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    4. Re:Spin laser instead? by shepd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't forget that CDs spin backwards in Australia.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:Spin laser instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly does!

      If matter is moving then you can use relativity to understand what it's doing to the space around it.

      However a 100gm spinning disc is hardly going to create anything interesting. sigh.

    6. Re:Spin laser instead? by Dust+Puppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, it does. You'd think it wouldn't - you can tell whether you're spinning or not without any reference to the rest of the universe by the forces on your body (central forces required to keep you from flying apart).

      But, if you work through the equations of general relativity for a universe rotating around a fixed body, you'll find that the motions of those distant galaxies generate forces on the body - outward forces exactly balancing the centripetal ones!

      So a spinning CD is exactly equivalent to a fixed CD with the universe spinning around it - no experiment can tell them apart.

    7. Re:Spin laser instead? by zapfie · · Score: 1

      But would the fixed CD explode if the universe spun around it at that speed? I was thinking you could tell the difference that way. Sorry, I'm not very good in the physics department..

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    8. Re:Spin laser instead? by blonde+rser · · Score: 2

      I just did a little checking and found out that in fact it is only your cd-rom that keeps the cd stationary. From what I can tell the rest of us seem to be rotating around it.

    9. Re:Spin laser instead? by Dust+Puppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yup, if you spin the universe fast enough around the CD, you will cause it explode. That would be a good party trick, but there are certain practical difficulties involved in getting the entire universe to spin.

      Besides which, because the CD spinning and the universe staying still is exactly equivalent to the universe spinning and the CD staying still, everybody would just think you were spinning the CD anyway.

    10. Re:Spin laser instead? by cappadocius · · Score: 2, Funny
      Actually, it's a little-known fact that all CD-ROMs do keep the CD stationary, and simply spin the rest of the universe around it. True fact.

      In fact it was this fact which lead us to discover the shape of the universe. It is the only one which will simultaniously spin around thousands CDs in different drives.

      --

      omnia tua castra sunt nobis

    11. Re:Spin laser instead? by SB5 · · Score: 1

      It must be true, that's why this copyprotected cd doesn't work in my computer!

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    12. Re:Spin laser instead? by kc0dby · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does. You'd think it wouldn't - you can tell whether you're spinning or not without any reference to the rest of the universe by the forces on your body (central forces required to keep you from flying apart).

      Actually, you can't detect your relative rotation- as long as the speed is constant. This is why the occasional non-instrument rated pilot goes into a death spiral. With no visual references, the fluids in your ears that detect motion will eventually stabilize in a constant speed turn (rotation) and ending the turn actually makes you feel like you are turning in the opposite direction and climbing.

      Neat experiment - Sit blindfolded in a chair, lean your head to one side and forward as much as comfortable, and have a friend spin the chair at a constant speed for 60 seconds. Then suddenly stop the chair and try and sit up straight.

      It's not as easy as it sounds, even for those of us with excellent balance.

      --
      I apparently forgot that sig != uptime...
    13. Re:Spin laser instead? by Scrab · · Score: 1

      So what would happen if I reversed the sipn direction on a CD? Would I rip the worl to bits as it tried to go in 2 directions at once?

      --
      RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
    14. Re:Spin laser instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's a little known fact that u know nothing about CD drives

  49. Slashdot is a DoS by SB5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Since this site has been posted twice, slashdot should be considered as the most used DoS software that's actually in use by actual hackers.

    --
    If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
    it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    1. Re:Slashdot is a DoS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking that when the news post is submitted, the folks at Slashdot read the post and check the links for 404 errors and then make a decision to post it.

      It's the visitors from Slashdot that click on hyperlink from the client's computer that direct them to the URL, not slashdot.

    2. Re:Slashdot is a DoS by A_Roche · · Score: 1

      That would make /. a zombie app then. But still used for DoS.

      --


      We now return you to your regularly scheduled moment of insanity...
  50. "Dammit Scotty, I need faster data!" by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I'm givin' the CD-ROM drive all it ken handle, Captain, anymore and the discs will explode!"

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  51. Should be from the Redundancy Department. by Photar · · Score: 1

    I'm sure I've seen this before. So, I'm sure someone's posted the same before me. The redundancy comes full circle now.

    --
    He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
  52. More appropriate title... by rsm00th · · Score: 1

    When web sites hyped-up fast, they explode

  53. rpm on body by clockwise_music · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much force the body can stand being spun around on the spot? That is, before you are violently sick :)

    1. Re:rpm on body by SB5 · · Score: 1

      i say we use Cowboy_Neal as the media, he seems to get around in the polls, if you know what i mean....

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  54. Maximum Velocity? (Not Spin) by Skevin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm in the process of converting a WGP Autococker into a CD/DVD Launcher - specially flattened barrel, tightened on one side to impart a spin - to launch Compact Disks with a burst of CO2. Although the CD's needed to be loaded by hand, one at a time (up until recently), I can reliably attain ~550 ft/s. This is enough to cleave thick pieces of styrofoam/cardboard or aluminum cans in half... or embed itself into soft wood like Eucalyptus trees. Against harder targets, such as rocks, the rounds simply undergo fragmentation and splinter into tiny plastic chunks. I don't know the effects against animal matter yet, because the contraption is notoriously inaccurate and squirrels are annoyingly fast.
    At higher velocities (~700 ft/s) the rounds begin to fragment in the "barrel". I'm currently examining other alternatives to increase the velocity, but I guess now I have to take spin to account. :)

    Other notes: I've put together a rudimentary feeder/hopper that now lets me use my CD Launcher in a semiautomatic fashion (and wastes more CO2 per shot)

    Solomon

    PS: I'm slapping together a solenoid-actuated electric trigger frame (similar to a Sandridge) to convert my paintball^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H CD gun to a fully automatic weapon. I don't know if it will work... yet. (I have given thought to converting an Angel, but I'm not willing to futz with $1300 gun, and I've been doing my own custom internals on 'Cockers for years now.)
    I estimate a potential ROF of ~13 CDs/second. (maybe *now* I'll be able to hit that pesky squirrel) My anticipation is that it still won't do any damage to brick walls, bronze statues, and masonry of quality craftsmanship, but will absolutely *shred* old wooden fences, thrown-out sofas, and squirrels.
    BTW, I once thought of calling it my Assault Ordnance Launcher, or AOL for short... the idea being that people would soon become afraid of my AOL CDs...

    --
    "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    1. Re:Maximum Velocity? (Not Spin) by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2

      Gee, back when we played Revolution Xwe thought a CD-shooting gun was a dumb idea but now it seems totally cool.

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    2. Re:Maximum Velocity? (Not Spin) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only are you retarded but what you propose is illegal. Check with ATF, they'll be more than happy to get you off the streets.

    3. Re:Maximum Velocity? (Not Spin) by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      Actual movement throught the air isn't going to put much force on the cds. Spin is your problem. Post instructions for this on the web ;)

    4. Re:Maximum Velocity? (Not Spin) by Jacer · · Score: 1

      That's not true, there was a trial based off of the second amendment on the right to bear arms. You can construct your own firearm on the grounds that it isn't an automatic, they had a thread on this about the man building his own gauss gun. Secondly, it wouldn't apply on the grounds that a cd shooting gun isn't a "firearm" the projectile is propelled without gunpowder, so there isn't as much regulation governing it

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    5. Re:Maximum Velocity? (Not Spin) by Oshuma.Shiroki · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the ripper from Unreal Tourny. ;)

      HEADSHOT!

    6. Re:Maximum Velocity? (Not Spin) by Skevin · · Score: 2

      Right. Well, it's not a problem for me to put up picts and instructions, but over the years, I've ended up slashdotting my friends' webservers, and Pacbell gets pissed off when I post content on my "personal" webspace that suddenly gets high load, even going as far as to try to charge me for the additional bandwidth!
      Unfortunately, I'm more of an engineer geek than a network administration geek, so any pointers on avoiding the /. effect (with a large hardware investement) would be helpful.

      Solomon

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
  55. This is getting ridiculous by twilight30 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well, I'll lose some karma for this, but what the hell is going on with the editorial staff here?

    OK. The staff can't be perfect, but this is not even close to being all that unique. I remember this story as well.

    I suggest the department headings be changed from frivolous titles to useful ones, to help with categorisation. I'd also like to see duplication URLs recorded, as Sircus suggests.

    Someone here noted that Slashdot has an option to show all sections. Perhaps editors should have this as a mandatory condition on their own logged-in sessions.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
    1. Re:This is getting ridiculous by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of what I see here, but that's because I'm a fanatic. That itself suggests that /. doesn't take a fair approach. Sure, posters bring to light good points and counterpoints, but I doubt the Geek Gods of /. are going to change their views.

      I point out a recent story about why someone left Linux for Windows. Taco said some of the points were wrong, not just that he disagreed with them. There is no wrong or right when dealing with subjective issues like popular culture (even that of geeks) or news, because nobody can be exactly the same.

      Most people use (or at least, IMO, should use) Slashdot for Geek entertainment and unsalted information. (Grains of salt should be taken by the reader, not the poster.)

      The stories are more biased than NPR's Talk of The Nation, and that's saying something.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    2. Re:This is getting ridiculous by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is possible for a point to be wrong, flat out.

      for instance:(these are just examples, because I don't want to dig up the article)

      Linux doesn't have any graphical interface.

      No company has ever released a game for Linux.

      Not one piece of Windows software runs well enough under WINE to consider using day-to-day.(rather subjective -- until you see that some programs run identically to their windows counterparts, such as Quake II, which makes this flat-out wrong.)

      Linux users are forced to use Netscape 4 if they want to surf the internet.

      Linux has no way of changing the IP address of an interface without resorting to the command prompt.

      No company would ever consider deploying Linux.

      No hardware company would ever release drivers for Linux.

      If I recall, he did make points such as the above(not the exact ones, mind you). There's nothing subjective about saying "$X doesn't exist under linux", or "linux doesn't have $Y", when it does exist. Saying "I don't like $Z" is a completely different matter...

      --
      It's been a long time.
    3. Re:This is getting ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are taking this stuff way too seriously. Take a pill or something (and no, I don't mean another caffeine pill).

      Just relax; say to yourself "slashdot is just a web site, it isn't really important". Say it ten times. Then find a nice refreshing gay porn site and, well, relax. I'm serious.

    4. Re:This is getting ridiculous by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Linux doesn't have any graphical interface.

      Linux doesn't. It's not even an operating system. It's a kernel. That means that there's at least one more layer of indirection(than direct access)(if cross-platform compatability is implemented, meaning no direct hooks into the kernel, and no direct access to hardware) before software can access devices. That leads to one of his points, that X is slow. X is a heap of several layers of indirection. I like it because that means I can use whatever windowmanager, video card, kernel and processor architecture I want to. With Windows, you get one windowmanager, any videocard, one kernel and one architecture.

      No company has ever released a game for Linux.

      In my opinion, tic-tac-toe is a game, not a game. Quake is a game. Just the fact that there can be two meanings for the same word in the same context proves that it's subjective.

      Not one piece of Windows software runs well enough under WINE to consider using day-to-day.(rather subjective -- until you see that some programs run identically to their windows counterparts, such as Quake II, which makes this flat-out wrong.)

      His experience with WINE may not have been a successful one. I never got DOSEmu running, so, for me, no DOS program (or even old ".com" programs like Robot Odyssey or some of Sierra's really old games) work well enough in Linux to warrent the effort to use frequently. Again, it's subjective.

      Linux users are forced to use Netscape 4 if they want to surf the internet.

      He may have been referring to mainstream-only software, which is a subjective distinction.

      Linux has no way of changing the IP address of an interface without resorting to the command prompt.

      I grimace here. I don't think he made that point, because he freely admitted that Linux was excellent for programming, and he did mention that he tried to get Linux to work for him.

      No company would ever consider deploying Linux.

      The fact that he referenced a Slashdot article shows he almost certainly didn't say that.

      No hardware company would ever release drivers for Linux.

      He said they rarely release drivers. And he said why.

      In reference to my second point above, think about the form of communication we're using. In English, everything is subjective. I've never heard a sentence that someone couldn't twist into meaning something different. That's what politicians and the Media are all about, remember? Ever notice that all most third-world politicians ever do is claim that their opponents' charges of corruption against them are lies? I suggest that's largely due to the inflexibility of their languages.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    5. Re:This is getting ridiculous by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1)The vast majority of statements imply the usage of linux as a platform. Therefore, it is generally good form to accept the common usage.

      2)Quake is a game which was released under linux. So are Quake III and UT(the former as a boxed item one could buy off the store shelf sans windows version). You'd have to get pretty narrow on your definition of "game" to subjectively say that no company has ever released a game for it. In such a case, the new, narrower definition of "game" would allow the new statement to be correct, but the sweeping generalization "no company has ever released a game for Linux" remains incorrect.

      3)dosemu used to be a biatch to install, I'll admit that, but because you didn't use it, you can't subjectively or objectively say anything about it's functionality as a DOS emulator, merely that you failed to install it. Objectively, the program emulates DOS well enough to run those games, regardless of your own experiences trying to install it.

      4)Narrowing the field to only mainstream software, both Opera and later versions of netscape are available. Objectively, there's nothing stopping an individual from using non-mainstream software in terms of functionallity, so in this case, it's not the linux platform which is forcing the user to use netscape 4, but their own stubbornness. Once again, narrowing the definition makes the new statement correct, but the original sweeping "users are forced to use netscape 4" statement is still false.

      5)and I grimace because I mentioned that these were mere examples. This very example came up yesterday in a chat I was having regarding the user freindlyness of linux. Sometimes trying to use an OS means spending five minutes just clicking around the interface just exploring, but that's another matter.

      6)Just another example. One that many people like the echo. You'd be suprised how many people(on slashdot) believe that no company would ever consider using linux as either a back-end or a desktop. This is, of course, wrong. Short of narrowing the definition(which makes that narrow definition correct, but the original statement still false), companies and governments the world over are considering Linux.

      7) I think you'd be suprised at the number of companies which are releasing drivers. Many winmodems have drivers for Linux now for instance.(oddly enough, my rockwell modem works far better under Linux than under Windows, as does my Geforce 4)

      8) the subjectivity of the language doesn't mean that vast overgeneralizations are correct when they are narrowed later.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  56. Why Corel CDs? by pornaholic · · Score: 1

    I couldn't imagine a more appropriate use for my spool of AOL CDs.

  57. My DVD drive blew up a CD two and a half weeks ago by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

    My 16X DVD-ROM Drive decided it didn't like one of my CD-Rs, so it blew it up on July 4th. I put the CD in to install some stuff (Mandrake RPMs not pirited software) and I heard this nasty *BANG*. I tried to open the drive, but it was of course broken. I pulled out the drive and there was a large shard of CD sticking out through where the aluminum lid met the back of the drive, and I had to *PRY* it out. Then I opend the drive and emptied the CD and bits of drive electronics in the trash, and I'm not covered under warennty.

    Oh, and this is a repeat article.

  58. Older technology saves the day? by doughmein_dot_net · · Score: 1
    This is exactly the reason why I bought an older Kenwood TrueX 62X CD-ROM drive a few months ago. It's quiet, reliable, and fast enough to do pretty much anything I need to do. It also spins much slower than modern drives.

    The other answer is to go find a nice, reliable 16X or 8X CD-ROM drive (brand of your choice) and use that instead.

    Are there ways to safely "underclock" current drives to limit their rotation speed?

    --
    Super ninja monkeys will one day rule the world!
    1. Re:Older technology saves the day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are various utilities that can set the maximum read speed on most drives. Try hdparm on linux.

    2. Re:Older technology saves the day? by adolf · · Score: 2

      Plextor drives can be 'underclocked' with software switches fairly trivially, using free tools. They also let you do some fanciness like control spin-down times, and how the drive responds to errors.

      OTOH, the fastest drive Plextor makes operates at 40x CAV. And I've fed many, many messed up (cracked, deeply scratched, off-balance) CDs into my 32x Plextor, without ever having one disintegrate, even when they're spinning at high speed for 12 hours or more.

      So, personally, I'm not too worried about the safety aspects. But if you want to slow down a CD-ROM for whatever reason, Plextor is a very sure route to follow.

  59. compact discs banned from airlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It really would be a good idea to ban compact discs from airline flights (if they're going to go so far as to ban things like nail clippers and eye glasse screw drivers). A CD can be broken into two pieces very easily and are still strong enough that either piece could be used to slash someone's throat, wrist, belly.

    VERY dangerous.

    1. Re:compact discs banned from airlines by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't know why that was modded down. He made a pretty good point. I stepped on a broken cd and my foot got cut pretty badly.

    2. Re:compact discs banned from airlines by shepd · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I think its about time to deny people wearing glasses from entering the plane too.

      I mean, is it so unthinkable that the edges of their the glass in their glasses has been ground down to a fine knife-like edge?

      And to think of the danger I've put myself in when I sat on a flight next to a guy wearing glasses. Thank god he didn't speak the "language of the terrorists" (heard this one on a news station just lately...).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:compact discs banned from airlines by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Also don't allow belts, luggage straps, shoestrings, or anything else that could be used as a garrote. Laptops and hardsided briefcases must be banned, you could bash someone's head in. And take those crutches away from that cripple, he could do real damage swinging that around - or maybe even conceal a weapon inside. (The last time I flew, the stewardess actually did seat a guy on crutches, then took the crutches out of a passenger cabin - I'm not sure if that was security or just because that commuter plane was so small.)

      Or maybe just handcuff everyone stronger than a 1 year old.

      Or, really radical idea - encourage citizens to actually defend themselves, instead of acting like subjects like a dictatorship and doing whatever the thugs want until the gov't thugs show up...

    4. Re:compact discs banned from airlines by sponge_absorbent · · Score: 1

      Not enough! I demand saftey!
      A weapon can be fashioned from a human bone.
      Any truely determined terorist could remove one of the bones from their forearm and shatter the end to create quite a weapon. Despite the fact that they would then only have one arm availiable to weild the gruesome weapon, they would still pose a threat.
      what if there were multiple terrorists? One terrorist could server as a 'temporary mobile weapon storage system' for the other terrorists. Once flying they would then disasemble the tmwss and use the makeshift weapons to achieve the desired result.

    5. Re:compact discs banned from airlines by dattaway · · Score: 2

      I hope you are joking about airlines banning nail clippers. Have they gone THAT FAR?

      I've known a few women who have nails more dangerous than the clippers. Will they make them wear gloves and a gag?

    6. Re:compact discs banned from airlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course there are many cases where acting in a hostage situation will result in many deaths. As with all things, you have to weigh the cost before you get up and swarm the criminals.

      I doubt you expect The K-6 citizens to swarm a loon with an automatic weapon on a school bus. Then again, this is Slashdot.

    7. Re:compact discs banned from airlines by tzanger · · Score: 2

      I hope you are joking about airlines banning nail clippers. Have they gone THAT FAR?

      Lord, wher have you been? :-) My wife had her clippers confiscated, broken, and then handed back to her by the security people on her trip to OK. Unreal. I'm surprised they let her wear her diamond engagement ring; they'll leave a nasty tear in your face if you get hit with it.

    8. Re:compact discs banned from airlines by markmoss · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about schoolbuses or automatic weapons?

      50 or more passengers definitely _could_ have swarmed 4 men armed only with boxcutters. Some of them would have needed stitches - but that's a hell of a lot better than enabling 19 kooks with no real weapons to carry off the greatest act of terrorism ever. (A boxcutter or other 2 inch blade is hardly a weapon - there are a few spots on the body where that shallow a cut could be fatal or disabling, but you can't reach those spots on someone that is free to move and fighting back. Of course, many sheltered middle-class Americans are such wimps that they'll _think_ they're disabled by a tiny cut...)

      That's just one incident. Maybe you think all those other incidents over the last 35 or so years where some kook has been able to terrorize a planeful of people for hours or days, and get a jumbo jet diverted to fly him wherever he wanted to go, can be counted as "successfully" handled because the kooks killed only a few people? I disagree. Each time the kook got a free flight to Cuba, Libya, or wherever, it encouraged the next kook. If (like the Israelis at Entebbe), we had made it clear at the start that hijackers were NEVER going to get away, it might have cost a dozen lives then, but deterring other hijackings would have saved more lives in the long run.

    9. Re:compact discs banned from airlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've known a few women who have nails more dangerous than the clippers. Will they make them wear gloves and a gag?

      We can only hope.

  60. Problem with high speed spinning by jsse · · Score: 2

    is that tremedous amount of energy is stored in the disc. Supposed that the disc is spinned very fast but before the break point, and someone stupid enough to stop the spinning(like open the cd tray while the light is on, we all do that don't we), the loosing disc will break out of the case and kill a couple of people nearby.

    1. Re:Problem with high speed spinning by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I used to work with a guy who said this happened with an old 88mb SyQuest cartridge drive. If you've never seen one of these disc cartridges, they're basically a 5.25" diameter 1/4" thick slab of heavy stuff (probably silicon, but I'm not sure) spinning in a translucent plastic cart. I don't know what the rotation speed of the disc is, but I do know it makes disturbing whiney sounds when it spins up.

      Anyhow, this guy I worked with said that the retention pin which holds the disc in place in the drive had worn down, and the disc worked its way out of the drive. Apparently, the thing slid out far enough to fire itself out of the drive and destroy the plastic casing, and then ricochet off a couple walls before landing in the middle of the room spinning like crazy.

      Apocryphal? Maybe. But amusing nonetheless.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Problem with high speed spinning by foo12 · · Score: 1

      Syquest drives in that form spin at 3600 rpm. (the strange things one picks up in life.)

    3. Re:Problem with high speed spinning by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. For a disc that big, that's a pretty good clip. Holy angular momentum, Batman!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:Problem with high speed spinning by foo12 · · Score: 1

      It's not so much the diameter of the disc or the speed --- CDs are the same diameter and even a 16x drive is spinning faster than a Syquest drive. What matters is the weight, as a Syquest disk is a lot heavier than a CD, letting it do more damage. I've seen a Syquest cart cause a drive to literally walk across a desk---try getting a CDROM to do that without shredding the CD first.

  61. yep its true by ironfroggy · · Score: 1

    this is a repost. i read this before. same site i think. sheesh...

  62. aol.yoyo.com by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    There goes my plans to turn all those free AOL disks into yoyo's to sell on ebay.

  63. what type of CD? by jsse · · Score: 1

    Will different CD have different break point? It took a hand and a foot to break a traditional transparent CD-R(try it), but those colorful black/blue/red CD will even break when you took it out of its case in the wrong way.

    1. Re:what type of CD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With most CDs, if you fold it slowly, you can get opposite sides to touch (taco shaped). If you fold it very quickly, they will usually shatter.

      I hold the disc in the trash can with my thumb and middle finger, a gentle push with the index finger to get it flexing in the right direction and then a quick squeeze... BANG!

  64. slashdotted... by cheeserd00d · · Score: 1
    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, three lefts do!
  65. Info on RPM ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... but not that package manager.

    An angular grinder that actually uses a CD-like abrasive disc revolves some 10 000 rpm. This applies for the smallest ones (110 cm - 125 cm diameter), larger discs tend to be slower, 6 000 - 8 000 rpm so that the edge of the disc won't reach warp speed.

    Routers (the real ones, for woodwork) revolve at some 30 000 rpm and the router blades are not larger than one inch in diameter. And these babies are made of very high quality steel and they are expensive.

    So, it is actually not very surprising that a CD-size object would break at 30 000 rpm, especially as they are probably made as cheap as possible.

  66. Apparently... by Phokus · · Score: 1

    ... 30,000 RPM'S (Requests per minute) made the webserver explode.

  67. I Know what DEPARTMENT its from... by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 2

    It is from the Department of Redundancy Department. I know I have seen this before too.

    Some people seem to be missing the point on CD's DVD's and other forms of optical storage. Speed is nice... but cheap is better If you need insane speed buy a hard drive. If you want compact and rewritable use flash memory... I got several negative comments about not liking new disc sizes in optical storage a couple days ago...

  68. yep by jsse · · Score: 1

    Update: Yep, it's a dupe...

    but we will not take it away, knowing that people would comment to it anyway.

  69. The next breakthrough... by gerardrj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    will be one of two things I think:

    1. The CD will be spun at 64x or so clockwise. Under that will be a second counter-rotating plane that will contain the laser. With the platters rotating in opposite directions you can break the 30K RPM physical limitations of the media. You can build the mechanism strong enough to do 300x normal CD speed I'd guess. 300 * 64 = 6,000x or ( 2.5GB/s). I wouldn't be surprised to start seeing such a mechanism in hard drives either. The disks i

    2. What I think will truely be the big breakthrough will be to not spin the disk or reader mechanism at all. Instead, the drive will use a scanner like method to read the entire CD in to a 700MB buffer in a few seconds. The disk will then sit idle while all requests are served from the buffer. I see this used in a slot loading scheme, so as the disk is drawn in it is read.
    The nifty thing about this would be that you could create a CD image in the buffer, change the bugger copy just like a normal disk drive, then eject the physical master and burn the buffer to a new CDR(/CDRW disk.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    1. Re:The next breakthrough... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

      The speed increase would be additive, not multiplicative, so you'd have a 364X speed increase. It'd probably be easier to keep the CD fixed and limit yourself to that 300X -- except I don't think it'd work.

      I'm not so sure you could spin a mechanism at such a rate without making it impossible to seek the laser back and forth. If the forces involved can cause a CD to fragment, then you'd need a hell of a drive to move the laser inwards and outwards; and a mechanism strong enough to do it probably wouldn't operate quickly enough to match that 300X speed.

      I suppose there are other ways to make the laser scan, and it might work. It's still a neat idea.

    2. Re:The next breakthrough... by mr_zorg · · Score: 1

      OK, here's a radical idea: make stronger CD's! How hard can it be to come up with a new kind of plastic that can withstand the stresses of faster rotation, but has the same optical qualitites?

    3. Re:The next breakthrough... by kekoap · · Score: 1

      Also it would be non-trivial to move data from the spinning laser to the stationary drive housing and computer...

    4. Re:The next breakthrough... by casings · · Score: 1

      If we go with option 2. then why would we even need a circular shape?

      wouldn't it be more effecient to rid the old circular shape and instead come up with some kinda square shape that could containe more information because of the corners?

    5. Re:The next breakthrough... by ndevice · · Score: 1

      If you can scan a CD, why not just scan something non-round? Your scanner obviously has the resolution, and since what you're proposing entails relatively high scan speeds, scanning a square or rectangle would give you more data per area.

    6. Re:The next breakthrough... by gerardrj · · Score: 2

      But the question would be WHY? There's a new optical data format in the same form factor that has about 3 times the base transfer rate, and stores about 4x as much data. It's called DVD.

      When we start thinking that a 52x DVD readers is too slow, THEN I'll start wondering when the stronger materials will arrive.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    7. Re:The next breakthrough... by dattaway · · Score: 2

      VCR heads might be a good example to look for something like this. The active guts in the spinning head are magnetically coupled to the base. One could impliment a counterbalanced lens assembly, complete with amplifier circuit on the spinning head.

      Also, we could use another trick VCR's use: they scan the media at a high rate, while it actually passes through very slowly. While we already have high speeds from the CD, we could use multiple heads and borrow a technique from the VCR that it uses to reassemble the two signals it gets.

      For the VCR, two heads take turns during each half of a revolution scanning the tape at a high speed near sideways motion to get the high frequencies required from the heads. The VCR has the problem that each half revolution, one head leaves and one head starts passing the media, leaving a gap in playtime. A clever means of injecting the signal into a quartz delay line for reassembling the signal is used.

      To double the CD's bandwidth (or any multiple speed increase,) we could place more IR pickups in parallel next to each other. This would read multiple groves during each pass. You can reassemble digitally, or just use the cheap quartz delay line hack like the VCR's use.

    8. Re:The next breakthrough... by gerardrj · · Score: 2

      Yup.. All three of you are correct, A square disk makes more sense for such a scanner.
      All the more reason for someone to develop one. The drive would still work for round (or square or triangle) shaped media. I just don't see the point in going to a new CD format when DVD and DVD-R is already available.

      As seen by my initial post's math error, my brain is in sleep mode, not accurate math posting mode so I won't attempt to calculate the percentage gain in storage by going 12cm square and loosing the hole while keeping density the same.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    9. Re:The next breakthrough... by gusnz · · Score: 2

      ...the drive will use a scanner like method to read the entire CD...

      You mean, data storage like that planned by IBM's Millipede Project? No wonder they're quitting the hard drive business... rotating media might be a thing of the past.

    10. Re:The next breakthrough... by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      Its probably easier to make the cd stationary and spin the head/laser around.

    11. Re:The next breakthrough... by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2
      like method to read the entire CD in to a 700MB buffer

      If my PC has 700mb memory to play with, I hope that it wouldn't be isolated in the CD-rom reader subsystem. Expect to see this only after average PC RAM installed tops several Gb, and allocating that 700Mb of cache to one component isn't a very skewed allocation.

      I like the idea mentioned by the other poster: multiple read heads.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    12. Re:The next breakthrough... by Bartmoss · · Score: 2

      Mh I like Method#2. Especially for my notebook. :-D

    13. Re:The next breakthrough... by csteinle · · Score: 1

      Surely you could do it magnetically using a couple of inductor coils?

    14. Re:The next breakthrough... by iiii · · Score: 2

      Interesting idea. Even better, leave the disc and the laser fixed, and do all the spinning with optics.

      --
      Light cup, beer drink, thin so chain, neck turtle fat, man I won't say it again
    15. Re:The next breakthrough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Circles have the most area per perimeter length. Thus, they are still more effecient than squares (unless it's cheaper to make squares)
      ---
      Jimmy C.

    16. Re:The next breakthrough... by Enonu · · Score: 2

      Except for the fact that you don't need DDR or RAMBUS for this kind of thing. In quanity, 768 of PC66 could probably be produced for $30, and probably in 3 256MB chips.

    17. Re:The next breakthrough... by Kalak · · Score: 1

      The concept of "caching" a CD is easy to impliment on both *nix and Mac. on *nix, just make an image:

      *nix:
      #mkisofs -r -o cd_image private_collection/
      #mount -t iso9660 -o ro,loop=/dev/loop0 cd_image /cdrom

      on Macs, use Disk Copy, make new image from device,double click to mount.

      Works in most all situations, but things like intentional bad blocks in copy protection disable this.

      I do it all the time, esp on notebooks where I don't want to waste the battery to spin up the CD.

      Someone could embed one of these into a CD drive with a smal hard drive and there you go.

      Wait a minute! I should patent this idea! Patent Pending, as of now must contact me for licensing this idea.

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    18. Re:The next breakthrough... by phorm · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't this be just a tad expensive? I mean, RAM is at more or less a low lately... but 700MB just for a CD-ROM cache would be a bit extreme. Not to mention DVD-ROM's... 7000MB of cache anyone?

    19. Re:The next breakthrough... by Ignavus+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      On Windows, you can do the same by using CloneCD to create an image. You can then mount these images with Daemon tools including copy protection mechanisms.

      --

      --

    20. Re:The next breakthrough... by Tycho · · Score: 1

      > To double the CD's bandwidth (or any multiple speed increase,) we could place more IR pickups in parallel next to each other. This would read multiple groves during each pass. You can reassemble digitally, or just use the cheap quartz delay line hack like the VCR's use.

      This is just like the Kenwood Multibeam technology. There are seven beams and the drive itself runs at a slower rotational speed. The drives go up to 72X. I have an old 52X drive from Kenwood and it is much quieter than an old 24X Sony CD-ROM drive that I use now. However, there are some issues with it; it doesn't like working with MacOS X for some odd reason. Kenwood seems to show no inclination to fix this which is too bad because otherwise they are fine drives.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    21. Re:The next breakthrough... by gerardrj · · Score: 2

      Exactly.
      But two points:
      1. The memory wouldn'y even be in the computer, it'd be in the drive.
      2. The memory could even be FLASH, so you could boot to the RAM image in the drive.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    22. Re:The next breakthrough... by gerardrj · · Score: 2

      Your computer side caching also doens't allow people to use software that requires the physical CD to be inserted. With the cache in the drive, the software wouldn't know the difference.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    23. Re:The next breakthrough... by gerardrj · · Score: 2

      You are considering RAM at the high end of the scale. The RAM in this cache-on-drive only needs to be fast enough to transfer at 20MB/s to make the drive comparable to most HDs today. That means even pre PC66 RAM should be enough to use here.

      My particular option would be to use non volitile memory like FLASH. Then you could reboot your computer from the cached image. Since flash takes no energy to maintain and only a little to read from, this would do wonders for CPU power consumption and for laptop battery life while using a CD.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    24. Re:The next breakthrough... by Espectr0 · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on, the technology is already there. There was this thing called zen technology which splitted the laser in 7 beams to be able to read 7 times as ordinary drives so you would not have to speed the rpm on the drive.

      Results? 72x TRUE speed, not max, and a very quiet hard drive.

      Why they went out of the market? Beats me, i had one (got fried together with a mouse because of a lightning) and i installed half life in few minutes.

  70. Re:My DVD drive blew up a CD two and a half weeks by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

    My 16X DVD-ROM Drive decided it didn't like one of my CD-Rs, so it blew it up on July 4th.

    Celebrating the birth of America with a bang of silicon...What an excellent display of American patriotism by your drive! :)

    Anyway, before playing discs in any drive, make sure it doesnt have any cracks originating from the center. Following this advice will assure that wont happen again.

  71. Holding back CD speed? by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    If the disks exploding at 28,000 rpms is holding back CD speeds and CD speeds are slower than Hard disk speeds, then Hard Disks must be spinning at faster than 28,000 rpms, right? WRONG! Hard Disks spin at 5400, 7200, and now even 10,000 rpms so CD's must be spinning slower than that...so the speeds given are NOT the bottleneck and won't be for quite some time.

    1. Re:Holding back CD speed? by DevilJeff · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes, the speed IS the bottlekneck when you talk about CDs. CDs all store the information in pits and landings, that happen to be the same (within margin) size on every CD. This is exactly why a DVD drive spinning slower, or as you point out, a hard drive, will be able to transfer faster than CDs, while still spinning slower: The data density per square inch is higher. Higher Data Density on a media (assuming the reading device can keep up) and raising the rotation speed BOTH affect transfer rates.

    2. Re:Holding back CD speed? by FueledByRamen · · Score: 1

      You have to take into account the much higher data density of a hard disk platter. For a good example, take the Seagate ST380021A drive - 80gb 7200rpm IDE. It has 2 platters and uses 4 heads, one on each side of each platter. 80gb / 4 surfaces = 20 gb per surface, which is quite a bit larger than 700mb/surface as is found commonly in CDs.

      Please correct me if I'm wrong, but here goes the fuzzy math... 20gb per platter spinning at 7200rpm in a drive whose read speed is about 20mb/sec. 20gb / 20m/sec = 1000 seconds to read 20gb. CDs read 150kb of data per X (speed). 1x = 150kb/sec. To read at 20mb/sec from a CD, 20000k/sec / 150k/sec = 133x, which would be slightly in excess of 60,000 RPM (i think).

      I probably got this part wrong: A 700mb CD = 5" diameter (with 1.5" hole + unusable area) Useful area is (pi * 5^2) - (pi * 1.5^2), or (78.53975 - 7.06858) = 71.47117 in^2 for 700mb. Let's say 70 in^2, for simplicity. That's 10mb/in^2. A 20gb CD would have to be 2000 in^2, which is about 25" diameter. Ouch.

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    3. Re:Holding back CD speed? by gerardrj · · Score: 2

      CD transfers speeds are lower than hard drive transfer speeds because hard drives have multiple platters and higher data density.

      A 7200RPM hard drive today may be able to sustain 40MB/s transfer rate, but that comes from at least four read heads. Each head is only transfering about 10MB/s. That roughly equates to 60X in a CD burner.
      So a single read head of a hard disk at 7200 RPM is roughly equivilent to CDROM at 22,000RPM(avg).

      And that shows us that the HD data density is much greater than that of a CD. The reason: CDs are a portable media. The have to remain compatible for long periods of time. You can't just arbitrarily shrink the size of a bit or change the encoding scheme. If this happened you'd need to purchase new CD players and CDRW drives every six months to keep up with technology. HDs are non-portable. The media is treated as a black box. You never need anyone to be able to read the media, just send the proper commands to the interface to the black box, so you can do whatever you like to the medium's format.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    4. Re:Holding back CD speed? by adolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      A 64x CAV CD-ROM drive will spin at a maximum of 12,800 RPM, according to my math, but drives don't seem to exist at that speed just yet. More common 56x drives spin at 11,200 RPM.

      If things are consistantly and violently exploding at a little over twice that speed, would it not make sense that there is a very real safety issue in making things faster than this?

      One might theorize that off-balance discs, cracked/scored/otherwise-damaged media, and just plain bad luck might cause things to go dangerously amiss even at current speeds.

      Current high-end SCSI hard drives spin at 15,000RPM, but do so using extremely well-balanced, carefully-produced, expensive solid aluminum platters and motors. And, besides, they're also encased in heavy metal boxes, and don't have a soft plastic face through which to fire shrapnel into the chest of the user.

      Consider that a CD-ROM has a much larger diameter than a typical hard disk platter, and is thus exposed to far greater centrifugal force and linear velocity. Consider also that a CD-ROM drive only costs a few dollars to make, and that CDs are down to a couple of cents each in large volume.

      Given this information and that contained in the article, I doubt it would take much effort to make a CD explode in a current 56x drive, thus presenting a very real bottleneck, indeed.

    5. Re:Holding back CD speed? by MyHair · · Score: 1

      One might theorize that off-balance discs, cracked/scored/otherwise-damaged media, and just plain bad luck might cause things to go dangerously amiss even at current speeds.

      I've been a bit paranoid about drives 32x and higher for a while now. When I'm working at a computer with one (I'm a tech), I'm conscious of where my eyes and face are in relation to the CD plane and keep my head away if my face is in the same plane.

      I haven't had any CD's break in the drive, but I figure if it does the shrapnel can damn well break through the plastic front panel at those speeds. And I know I've seen cracked and abused CD's. It's just a matter of time before someone gets hurt.

      I don't like the fast drives anyway. Anything over 8x or 16x spends too much time spinning up and makes too much noise. I got hold of an old SCSI NEC MultiSpin 6x CDROM and I swear that thing is faster than my 16x no-name IDE CDROM.

    6. Re:Holding back CD speed? by puppetluva · · Score: 2

      "Current high-end SCSI hard drives spin at 15,000RPM, but do so using extremely well-balanced, carefully-produced, expensive solid aluminum platters and motors. And, besides, they're also encased in heavy metal boxes, and don't have a soft plastic face through which to fire shrapnel into the chest of the user."

      You've convinced me... I'm switching to SCSI. ;)

    7. Re:Holding back CD speed? by adolf · · Score: 2

      hrm.

      That's why I like my 32x Plextor. It's nearly silent, and has a few very neat programmable options:

      The disc can be automagically spun down to a slower speed if excessive vibration is detected. This keeps it quiet, but should also help with CDs that are ready to burst into shrapnel.

      The drive can slow down for read errors, or just zip along as fast as possible as often as possible. (this latter option might be good for video, where it's more important that data arrive on time than it is for it to be accurate)

      The drive can be told -never- to spin faster than a given speed. (great for ripping audio CDs)

      The drive can be instructed to start transferring data before the disc reaches whatever speed is considered ideal (based on the above parameters).

      That last option, combined with programmable idle spin-down time, can eliminate spin-up delays in almost all cases.

      If I wanted to, I could have my drive running at 1x, -all day-, waiting for me to access it. And when I finally do want some data from it, it'll start transferring immediately, and then start spinning up to some quick-but-sane speed.

      I've gotten thousands of hours (not power-on hours, but real-live usage) out of this thing in the 3 or 4 years I've owned it, and it hasn't missed a beat yet.

      And support? It doesn't have a flashable firmware, but Plextor sent me the latest ROM (as in, a tangible IC) free-of-charge, just for asking. I didn't need it, but I'd been restoring damaged audio CDs, and it did help a bit with that.

      Otherwise, I've never had to talk to Plextor support for anything I've owned or spec'd from them.

      Not a very good business model, though - I'll probably never need to replace it. ;)

  72. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you, a mouse or do you just have a serious male member size problem?

  73. RC Propellers as well by philipsblows · · Score: 2

    Anyone with a passing interest in radio controlled airplanes already knows this fact:

    Plastic propellers disintegrate at high rpm.

    So they use wooden ones. The document (the cached version, sans photos) did not go into great detail about the nature of the material failures, which they claim will be investigated with SEMs, but it would be interesting to use their same setup with same-size components made of other materials. A wooden CD-sized disc, an aluminum one, etc.

    Not that CDs should be made of wood, but certainly plastic at high rpms is a compromise between cost and durability.

  74. merry-go-round by charlie763 · · Score: 3, Funny

    At what angular velocity would a child (~30kg) explod on a merry-go-round? What would happen if they were to have a CD in their pocket?

    --
    Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
    1. Re:merry-go-round by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More interestingly, what angular velocity is required for my foot to kick you balls off, sucker ?

  75. portables by Cardhore · · Score: 2

    Good idea, except they'd probably break in portable players with skip protection, as those spin the discs faster than 1x.

    1. Re:portables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would the RIAA care? They've already got your money.

  76. Uhhh... by shepd · · Score: 1

    Protected disks are designed not to work in anything but a simple, everyday, CD Player. The specs for most all of these (except the esoteric, and walkman style, both of which the RIAA couldn't care about) say they run the disc at 1x only. Unless you're trying to build in shock protection, there's no need to ever spin the disc at over that rate (except maybe for fast forwarding, but I still don't think that's done like this).

    Most drives can't have their ripping speed set AFAIK, which shouldn't surprise anyone whose read about what a hack ripping really is anyways.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:Uhhh... by mr_zorg · · Score: 1

      Actually, the ripper I use does let you set the rip speed. Plus, ahead software (the people who make Nero) also makes a product called Drive Speed that let you control the speed of your CD drive...

    2. Re:Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and hdparm can be uses to set the speed of the cd.

  77. how about this by v8interceptor · · Score: 1

    hold the CD still, then have the reader spin around real fast? I guess the laser might get distorted though...

    --
    --- Why are you wearing that stupid bunny suit? | Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
  78. A faster way (2,466X) by carambola5 · · Score: 5, Funny
    I take no credit for this, but I remembered reading an interesting comment on the last time slashdot posted something like this. All credit should go to labradore:
    This is a good way to get a fast CDROM drive:
    1. Buy a 10,000x10,000 dpi scanner with firewire interfeace
    2. Write cdrom image analysis algorithm.
    3. Scan cdrom image into temp hard drive space and analyse, extracting data
    This is based on these rough figures:
    • A cdrom is approximately ( PI*5^2 - PI*0.75^2 )= 76.75 sq. inches of data surface
    • If a cdrom has about 5.6 billion bits on that surface then the density is roughly 76 million bits per square inch.
    • That works out to about 8,800 bits per linear inch. Assume you will need a little better resolution than that because there is some empty space between the dots on a cd surface. 10,000dpi aught(sic) to be good enough.
    Assuming that the scanner is faster than the firewire (400Mbps) and 10% overhead for the data transfer, each cd image will be approx. 7.3 billion bits, taking just over 20 seconds to transfer. This device is a 2,466x speed CDROM "drive". Put that in your Pentium and smoke it! Scanner and algorithm design left as an excercise for the reader.
    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
    1. Re:A faster way (2,466X) by Dthoma · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't this cause dust on the disk to become an even bigger problem? In a square inch, you have 1,000,000 data points. Even if a speck of dust only takes up 1/100,000th of that square inch, then you immediately lose 10 data points. The problem would be worse than with current CDs due to the higher data density.

      --

      Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

    2. Re:A faster way (2,466X) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point on the AC... never thought of that. Of course, now I'm doing it so I don't get modded Off-topic. Oh, and btw, I have "excellent" karma already, so there's really no point in whoring.

    3. Re:A faster way (2,466X) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A cdrom is approximately ( PI*5^2 - PI*0.75^2 )= 76.75 sq. inches of data surface ...

      since when is a cd 10 inches in diameter? i think you mean centimeters, no?

      area circle = pi*r^2, he is using 5 for r, thus is stating that a cd has a radius of 5 inches (diameter of 10), which it doesnt.

    4. Re:A faster way (2,466X) by ninewands · · Score: 2

      A cdrom is approximately ( PI*5^2 - PI*0.75^2 )= 76.75 sq. inches of data surface If a cdrom has about 5.6 billion bits on that surface then the density is roughly 76 million bits per square inch.

      Actually, it's ( PI*5^2/4 - PI*0.75^2 )= 17.86 in^2 of data area ( PI * R^2 or PI * D^2 / 4 ). A CD holds, nominally, 650MB * 8 = 5.2 Gbits. This yields a density of 291,153,415.45 bit/in^2 or, assuming uniformly distributed bits, 17063.22 bits/inch. The rule of thumb for scanners is that they need a resolution twice the size of the smallest feature to be resolved, therefore, a scnnare with a minimum resoltion of about 35000 DPI would be required. Assuming you used a ONE bit per pixel scan, you would need to transfer 21878500000 bits. At 400 Mbits/sec, that 54.7 seconds. This is assuming that you ignore the increased density of bits due to the inter-track blank space ...

    5. Re:A faster way (2,466X) by blair1q · · Score: 2

      Small CD errors are currently corrected in software. Since the new software would only add the ability to convert a square grid of pixels to a circular spiral of bit-positions, you would use the same decoding and correcting algorithms.

  79. You beat me to it by Critical_ · · Score: 1

    You're exactly right, it is the data density that matters. The problem with CD media is that the density is stuck so the only way to speed things up is to get the CD spinning faster. Hard drives of the same physical size today compared to those just 5 years ago (usually) have the same number of platters, but the density of those platters has gone up along with the amount of data that can be transferred.

  80. A NEW LOW for Slashdot.org by adixon01 · · Score: 1

    This story was ran a few week back, and was proved a dupe back then because of their is no such thing as a kelvar enforced cd.

    1. Re:A NEW LOW for Slashdot.org by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      This story was ran a few week back, and was proved a dupe back then because of their is no such thing as a kelvar enforced cd.

      When you get some READING COMPREHENSION SKILLS, get back to us.

      They wrapped some KEVLAR WIRE around the CD to reinforce it. They could have easily made it COPPER REINFORCED by wrapping copper wire around the CD too. Goodness sakes, I hate WILLFULLY STUPID PEOPLE.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    2. Re:A NEW LOW for Slashdot.org by adixon01 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      actually i read it the first time, this is a FALSE article, the whole thing was made Up

    3. Re:A NEW LOW for Slashdot.org by aes12 · · Score: 1

      WhY CaN'T EiThEr Of YoU UsE CaPiTaLiZaTiOn CorReCtLy? It's much easier to read when you use it the way you were taught in school. See?

    4. Re:A NEW LOW for Slashdot.org by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      they obviously liked the class on e.e.cummings

      1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 ...submit

    5. Re:A NEW LOW for Slashdot.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's much easier to spout crap than to come up with well formed arguments on the topic at hand. See?

  81. Seems that cd's also disintegrate at lower speeds by slpyhd · · Score: 1

    And its getting worse these days, saw lots of aopen 40x drives with powdered cd's inside, but also other brands

  82. Re:My DVD drive blew up a CD two and a half weeks by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

    Yes, and patroticly encouraging the growth of the DVD drive cartel.

    And... How DARE you assume I'm American?

  83. At This Rate.. by Townshend · · Score: 1

    Man, I've posted like 5 stories and they've all been rejected. At this rate I have a better chance of going through the database and posting an older story!

    1. Re:At This Rate.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should go to http://www.kuro5hin.org/ and post them there if they don't get on Slashdot. Atleast that way someone will benefit from the description and stuff you bothered to type up.

  84. An obvious suggestion? by Restil · · Score: 2

    I know this is a Troll, and probably has already been mentioned. But just for morbit curiosity's sake, I entered the word CDROM into the search field on slashdot, clicked submit. And what do you know! The duplicate article was #4. FOUR!
    This took me all of 5 seconds to check. This
    wasn't something about Microsoft that would be buried 10 pages back, no. This shows up at the upper half of the upper quarter of the list of responses to a simple 10 second (I wonder if we did this before) check.

    I know dupes are going to happen from time to time. With several editors, its impossible for all of them to know off the top of their heads if the article has been posted before. Even if it were only one person, I still wouldn't hold it against them that much. But some modicum of effort should be taken to at least avoid looking like a complete moron. This means, make sure its not still on the front page somewhere (this includes the older stuff links), make sure you can't find it in the search list with one or two
    of the common topics of the article, and perhaps,
    if possible, do a quick check on the URL to see if its been mentioned before.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  85. Necessary? by Quantum+Singularity · · Score: 1

    This is my first post on /. I have a 56x CD-ROM drive in my computer. That computes to an approximate value of 9.856 Mbps, and as such, 650MB would take 1 min 5 sec. IMHO, that is really not bad, although I do prefer my 10/100 Ethernet. I have noticed that it makes a loud whirring noise, and a scraping noise when it spins down. The CDs also come out VERY hot. I have never left a CD in there for long. If 52x can destroy a CD, I just hope the computer's casing can stop any fragments. I guess this puts a whole new "spin" on "fragging"! :)

  86. Cheap and geeky way to overclock dremel tools by dattaway · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dremels can spin much faster than 30,000rpm. Those motors have a field winding and an armature winding. If you decrease the field current, it causes the armature current to go through the roof. This is called "field weakening" and is a common method to get motors to spin faster. The motor's speed can be expressed as a ratio of armature/field current. The motor's speed is that ratio.

    AC motors are tricky to do that with, but one sure way to overclock a dremel motor is by "overclocking" one of those 120VAC inverters. Look for an opamp that generates the clock frequency and the resistor for that RC circuit can be replaced with a potentiometer. You can vary the frequency from 0 to about 400Hz. Higher the frequency, the higher AC motors will sync. Don't go to high on the frequency or the inverter's mosfets will exceed their slew rate. That means most of the energy they are trying to switch will be disapated inside themselves, because they can only switch between the voltage rails so fast. Another resistor on the opamps will adjust the voltage for charging the storage capacitor. This one will have the greatest effect. You can get most inverters to pump out over 200 volts. Use an oscilloscope to track down the inverter's signal generator.

    I found a non-overclocked dremel will easily cause the cd's outer tracks to skew. Extreme vibration will be the result as the cd warps quickly. Speed will drop quickly due to this imbalance. Solution: turn up the power!

    1. Re:Cheap and geeky way to overclock dremel tools by matrix29 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I found a non-overclocked dremel will easily cause the cd's outer tracks to skew. Extreme vibration will be the result as the cd warps quickly. Speed will drop quickly due to this imbalance. Solution: turn up the power!

      I wonder what would happen if you used a heat gun to soften up the outer tracks as it spins fast. I wonder if these CDs would stretch to the size of pizza dishes (extremely warped dishes of course). Since you've already got the spinner made, you only need a $25 heat gun.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    2. Re:Cheap and geeky way to overclock dremel tools by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Be sure to cook your new ISO pizza properly by placing it in the microwave.

    3. Re:Cheap and geeky way to overclock dremel tools by Sheridan · · Score: 1

      ObJargonFileRef: ISO pizza? How about an ANSI Standard Pizza?

    4. Re:Cheap and geeky way to overclock dremel tools by bludwulf · · Score: 1

      In glassblowing this is how huge glass plates are made. A bowl form is spun rapidly on the end of the pipe and it will flatten out almost completely. Sometimes they are hung down and paddled to create a "wobbly" effect. Someone should make some CD art. ;)

  87. Walking hard dirves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By making the read heads seek quickly across, and then slowly back, repeatedly, you can make some old mainframe hard disks "walk" across the room :-)

    1. Re:Walking hard dirves by vortexau · · Score: 1

      I heard about that! Didn't some guys hold 'Hard Drive Races'?
      .

      --
      (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  88. ... will require a reformat by mike_lynn · · Score: 1

    Well if we're going this way, then let's make things simple and go to square discs. Much easier geometry for mechanisms that lack spinning.

  89. Why? by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    You know it's a dup. I know it's a dup. So WHY the fuck did you put it up? Was it so good you just had to print another?

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/04/19/1662 28 &mode=thread&tid=137

    So who, besides me, obviously, will get the Redundant/Troll/Flamebait/Overrated for posting this this story? Chris? Oh yeah, yet another good example why authors don't get modded. CUZ THEY'D BE OUT ON THEIR ASS.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  90. Or... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    They could build stronger CDs. Just a thought.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  91. It's old news, but Sony's attempt to put a stopper on "illegal burning" of CDs was to add an extra feature to it, that made it crash a computer every time it was played. The way this can be prevented is to look on the written side of the cd, and see where the data containing the music had been recorded. A little more to the outside, a line of data featuring the Anti-copy information exists. If you take any old marker and draw over this "feature", the disk will "theoretically" work on computers as well. Utterly pointless.... What next? As was said: Cds that crash and burn when put through more than 1X speed? CDs that crash cd players? CD-players that wear out cds, so you'll have to buy a new one every week? Scary..

  92. But I don't see... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    ...Why they'd go through all the trouble to make a counter-rotating assembly when they realistically could stregthen the disks. But personally, I think they'll stop using CDs before either happens. Not cost effective. I like 2Gb as much as the next guy, but these hyper drives are only going to see the light of day (that's IF they see the light of day) in very high end corperate environments.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:But I don't see... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      They could strenghten the disks of course, but even if they make the stuff of carbon nanotubes or industrial diamond, whatever that's near impossible to break, it wont do any good if they are still vibrating so much it can't be read.

      And even if the disks don't break, there still might be a change of drive mechanism somehow breaking and letting frisbee out, and at that speed, plus being made of ultra-strong material it can do some serious devastation.

      Not to mention the noise... ever though 52x drives sound like yet engines? Well wait 'till it's ten times that!

    2. Re:But I don't see... by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 2

      The problem with strengthening the discs is you lose backward compatibility. What if the CD-ROM drives start assuming the discs are stronger and they increase their spin speeds? Somebody somwhere is going to ignore all that confusing computer terminology and put in their old CD, spin it till it explodes, and then sue the CD-ROM drive manufacturer. Unless the drives can somehow determine that the CD is not the new "strong" format, manufacturers would not want this kind of liability.

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  93. Re:oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HTML? Sorry, I'm not a programmer.

  94. Don't feel bad... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    I'm 10/10 on rejections ^__^ One wonders where they get this news in place of the real news.

    "let's post a story on that year and half old sub movie, U571..."
    "Nah... I want a story on the anniversery of Air Conditioning!"
    "I'm kinda dry on stories over here. ..Was thinking we could repost that one on CD maximum speeds."
    "No! U571!"
    "Dammit! I was talking first!"
    "Boys, boys, boys... Don't fight. We can print them ALL!"
    "Hurray!"

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Don't feel bad... by Blackneto · · Score: 0

      Yeah i submitted a story about the SANS institute holding a women only security conference that got rejected. That would have made for some interesting discussion knowing the assholes around here.

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
  95. If Intel made CD-ROM drives... by guttentag · · Score: 4, Funny
    If Intel made CD-ROM drives, we would start seeing the following in 95% of new PCs:
    1. A giant fan aimed at a heat sink attached to the spindle that grips the CD
    2. Pressurized CD-ROM drives
    3. A sticker on the "5x-the-speed-of-sound" drive stating that by using this CD-ROM drive, you agree that the speed of sound is one-tenth the speed the rest of the world claims.
    One of the above would be appended to what we know today as a 24x CD-ROM drive.
  96. Babies explode when spun too... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Yep, that's right. I spun my sister around when she was teeny weeny, and I ended up wearing the contents of her tummy. I apologize for not recording the RPM it took to do that.

  97. Re:Bannage (BONDAGE) target? by matrix29 · · Score: 2

    THE POINT:

    SO... TO MAKE OUR SKIES SAFE: only 3 at a time, naked and with hand and feet chained fast to your seat; nothing else in tow. that would about do it.


    Hmm... the passengers naked & chained to their seats. Welcome to Bondage Air where the Second Class is REALLY Second Class and the First Class gets deal out discipline to those naughty naughty Second Class riders.

    I see a market for this somehow.

    --
    "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  98. Corel CDs? Why not RA2 CDs? by jointm1k · · Score: 1

    "Oh and they seem to like using Corel CD-ROM discs for their experiment."

    I think they had better tested this with 'Red Alert 2' CDs. (You know, the rts-game Red Alert 2.) I know of nine cases where people had exploding Red Alert 2 CDs. Some with such force, that it ripped their CD-ROM drive to shreds. >:(

    --
    You know it makes sense, a little reminder from jointm1k.
  99. Old version was better by Bastian · · Score: 2

    At least it didn't make the stupid suggestion that CD-ROM drives don't seem to be getting faster because they're nearing the speed at which CD's might explode from G-forces.

    The real reason for the limited speeds that can be reached with CD-ROM drives is the vibrations in the CD resulting from motion in that speeds. If the CD moves too much, the laster can't read it properly. Hence, the reason why caddy drives used to be popular - the caddy helped keep the CD still, thus allowing the drive to spin it faster.

    If you want a faster CD-ROM drive, you'll have to do what they did in this experiment - tighten the CD down so that it is always perfectly coplanar with the plane of rotation.

  100. Multiple beams - alternative to ridiculous RPMs by XNormal · · Score: 4, Informative

    Zen Research has developed a technology that reads the disk using 7 beams in parallel, achieving high throughput without spinning the disk at ridiculous speeds.

    It has been licensed by several companies including Kenwood that used it to produce an amazing 72x drive.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    1. Re:Multiple beams - alternative to ridiculous RPMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea...

      On paper. In practice, Kenwood's drives were among the crappiest made at the time. They faced multiple class-action lawsuits over the failure rate of the drives, beginning with the TrueX 52x.

    2. Re:Multiple beams - alternative to ridiculous RPMs by dark&stormynight · · Score: 1

      I went to their site...it looks like Zen has assumed room temp & gone T.U.

  101. Yeah, I know... by joto · · Score: 2
    But there are several perfectly acceptable solutions to this. The first one is to have more read/write heads. I don't know how many it's realistic to squeeze in, but I would be surprised if it wasn't possible to squeeze in at least 50 (it might be too expensive though).

    The second, and not so obvious solution is to spin the player in the opposite direction of the cd. Then both can rotate at their maximum angular speed, and the effective angular speed will be the sum of the CD-speed and the player speed. I'm not sure how fast you can spin a cd-player before moving the heads precisely will become a problem, but if you throw enough money at it, I'm sure it's probably close to the speed you can spin a CD at.

    On the other hand, I'm relatively happy with my 40x burner. 2-3 minutes for burning a full CD is about as tolerable as floppies used to be. If I want something more from CDs now, it must be safety (never loose data), storage capacity, and being able to use them as a real read-write medium, not something that needs to be "blanked".

  102. Google cache here by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 2, Redundant

    The site is slashdotted, so here's a link to the google cachie.

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
  103. CDs in microwave by upt1me · · Score: 1

    When CDs are placed in the microwave for over 5 seconds they tend to catch on fire.

    1. Re:CDs in microwave by 5lash · · Score: 1

      They dont really catch on fire as such, just start sparking little blue lights, and they give out a whole load of yellow smoke. But they look really cool afterwards. I recommend a stack of 10-15 AOL CDs (Yes, they have to be AOL! :p)

  104. Another idea by PatSmarty · · Score: 1

    Don't move the disc and don't move the laser around. Instead, use a swiveling mirror to direct the laser to the disc from a fixed point. After bouncing off the mirror and the CD, the laser will then go to all sorts of directions, but with a correctly shaped mirror, you can bring it back to one point where you place a sensor. Pretty simple.

    Smells like a cool business idea to me...

  105. I think it has been tried... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2

    I believe there was a turntable in the late eighties that did that. The record stayed still while the tonearm tracked linearly from the out side in and rotated the record. Couldn't find anything on google about it though. I think it might have been a Bang & Olufsen.

    1. Re:I think it has been tried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are talking about what is known as a "Linear tracking turntable" Where instead of the tonearm pivioting, it slid in and out in a straight line. The record still had to rotate though. Many companies made these tables.

    2. Re:I think it has been tried... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2

      I know what a linear tracking turtable is, no this one had a tonearm that looked like a linear tracking system but rotated on a ring on the outside of the record. I can't say that it was a good idea.

  106. Why not 2 heads or 3 or 4? by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    No reason to spin the lasers, if you put 2 lasers at 2 intervals then you read twice as fast.
    3 lasers, three times as fast etc.

    Cheaper than moving the laser. But the scanner idea was sweet.

    1. Re:Why not 2 heads or 3 or 4? by mr3038 · · Score: 2
      if you put 2 lasers at 2 intervals then you read twice as fast. 3 lasers, three times as fast etc

      Or 7, like kenwood did three years ago. Though, I think that they are using only one laser and beam splitter and mirrors and stuff instead of multiple lasers.

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  107. Record? by corian · · Score: 1


    The Case of the Exploding CD-ROM Record

    CD-ROM record? as in "A disk designed to be played on a phonograph."? Okay, I'll buy "CD-ROM album". But they didn't use a music album -- they used a Corel disc.

    That's it -- a CD-ROM disc. That sounds much better.

    What sort of idiots are these people anyways?

    1. Re:Record? by TheShadow · · Score: 1

      Yeah but saying "CD-ROM disc" is redundant.

      --

      --
      "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    2. Re:Record? by corian · · Score: 1


      well, all we need is some way to indicate that we're referring to the physical item itself, and not it's digital content.

      "the CD-ROM itself"
      "the CD-ROM medium"
      hmm.

  108. Dremel by dannyweb · · Score: 1

    I discovered this a few months ago when I attached a cd to a cordless dremel tool (I was really bored) and put it on the higest possible setting (25,000 rpm) and the cd exploded after a few seconds. Really startled my cat, and I'm still picking little pieces of cd out of the most random things in my room.

  109. Great experiment! by the_real_tigga · · Score: 1

    So CDs "explode" when spun real fast?

    Now thats great news! Who woulda thought of that? Those shiny futuristic holo-like plates from the last century? OMFG.

    People, anything will explode when spun fast enough, and 30.000 RPM is fast enough for many materials, including most plastics and glasses.
    Just ask anyone working around centrifuges.

    --
    my .sig is better than yours.
  110. why the terrorists are after USA by yerricde · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes, I know the answer is 'Terrorists hate Americans', but why?

    Because we are the near-monopsony buyer of oil, the Middle East's chief export.

    Because the majority of us don't practice Islam.

    Because we defend the State of Israel.

    It makes the terrorists want to use CD shrapnel to hijack an airplane.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:why the terrorists are after USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because wemake it a national policy to slaughter the innocent?

  111. Copy protection by gtog · · Score: 1

    Future copy protection warning:

    WARNING - illegal cd copy detected - cd will explode in 10 seconds - please wait

  112. i bet some OC kiddies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gonna start some contests now. which pc is gonna last longer. like the decibel drag racing of cars.

  113. Revolution X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this what the CDs did in the game Revolution X?

  114. This isn't the first time I've heard this one... by jmertic · · Score: 1

    I remember ready a long time ago when 12x was the norm that CD drive couldn't get any faster without the CD exploding inside the drive. They figured 20x speeds would never happen because of this.

    And someone also said something about 640k being enough also IIRC...

  115. Gamecube... by Junta · · Score: 2

    I know part of the reason for using small DVDs was anti-piracy (though dvd-rs in that form factor should be available before long, if not already...), but perhaps some stuff in the article relates to the choice of such a small disc. With the small disc, there is a much more consistant speed with a constant rotation rate from innermost to outermost track. And that speed could be close to normal DVDs at the outermost tracks, since it could be spun faster with lower risk and noise... Just an offtopic thought...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  116. Chrisd strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a fucking moron. You know that button at the bottom of the page? S-E-A-R-C-H? USE IT, FUCKTARD!

  117. I've seen two CDs explode in 50x drives by sidetrack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We've had two CDs go in the last 6 months in my office, both in 50x drives. One was a CDR, the other was an original photoshop CD. In both cases bits flew out of the front of the drive, and they didn't half make a noise! One of the drives work afterwards, despite having bits of plastic knocked off by the exploding disc.

    Dangerous if you ask me - if you have a tower case, make sure the CD drive isn't at eye level!

    1. Re:I've seen two CDs explode in 50x drives by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

      "Dangerous if you ask me - if you have a tower case, make sure the CD drive isn't at eye level!"

      Are you kidding? Just a little eye damage for a law suit that'll keep you set for life. This is a legal gold mine!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:I've seen two CDs explode in 50x drives by sidetrack · · Score: 1
      Ahh, but I don't live in the US (any more) - I live somewhere at little less lawyer dominated.

      However for those of you who live somewhere that is - if you want the opportunity for serious pain, and litigation, go through your CDROM collection, and look for any that have little cracks at the hub, and then attach a little fragment of postit note at the opposite edge (remembering to remove it before you call your lawyer).

  118. Forget hynodisc by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    I think we have a cheap new entry for Robot Wars!

  119. this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i saw this exact same story here a few months ago...

  120. Counter rotating Lasers? by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    Why is everyone going to all this effort to speed up cd transfer rates. It should be obvious how easy it is to speed the whole mess up. All you need is a strong source of Brownian motion.

    A really hot cup of tea poured into an cd player/burner should do it.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  121. IBM cd drives do that already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have had 3 different IBM NetVistas eat cd roms that were left in the drive overnight. You would be minding your own buisness, clicking on my computer, you would hear the CD drive spin up and then *BANG!* "Crunch!" that would be all she wrote for the CD drive! If you pressed the eject button it would rain silvery plastic bits all over your desk. IBM has been replacing our CD drives without much question so I assume it is a common problem with their NetVistas.

    1. Re:IBM cd drives do that already! by giantsquidmarks · · Score: 1

      I work at a place that uses thousands of NetVistas... no problems like that here...

  122. Shiiit... by tapped_spine · · Score: 1

    You should see a cast-iron lathe chuck spun at 10,000RPM. Saw a real wannabe engineer try that in a machine shop once. Can you say centrifugal force? Yeehaww, Cowboy Neal woulda been proud...

    "toolmakers have steel balls" - Hank Shimenski

  123. Not grounding things by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
    Near where I live, the council decided to put up a ~50 foot metal tower and tent combination for an exhibition. Not grounding it sensibly turned out to be a problem when a thunderstorm appeared and it was hit by lightning.

    The exhibition? Architecture of the future :-)

  124. "dupe" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do know, "dupe" means it's a fake, and "dup" means it's a duplicate, right?

  125. Re:better way - another way by gessel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A fun experiment is to put a polished, hardened steel rod through the spindle hole, then hit it with a jet of compressed air. If you get the bearing effect just right the CD will spin up to a 10-20krpm and will occasionally disintegrate on the spindle. Mostly though if you let it slip off the spindle it'll hit the ground, stand due to gyroscope effect while the edge melts against the ground enough to get traction, then take off across the room and explode on impact with the opposite wall.

    You can also make an air bearing with an orange by cupping your hand just right and blowing compressed air between your hand and the orange. Oranges explode good.

  126. Google cache by MTWZZ · · Score: 1
    --
    gcc: brain.c: No such file or directory
  127. Google Cache by Leviat · · Score: 0

    Google Cache

  128. In other news... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 0

    So do kittens and puppies. Clean-up is more of a mess though...

  129. A bunch of materials scientists, I see... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    In other news, CDs shatter under high impact. They have a tendancy to melt when exposed to very high temperatures. Oh, and don't try to put them under too much tension or shear either.

    Hey, Einstein! What doesn't break when spun fast enough? This is news?!?!

    1. Re:A bunch of materials scientists, I see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Einstein! What doesn't break when spun fast enough?

      Neutronium, I guess.

  130. Truth as Activator for Fiction by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    This story sounds like bunk, because of two things. First, if anybody can provide any proof at all of Winchester drives with six foot platters I'd like to see it, since the largest drive I've heard of or worked with is 18 inches across. Second, "forcibly clamped down"? How, exactly? These old drives had brakes on the spindle (the operator would stop them and lift them out with a handle on occasion, which led to another urban legend about a guy who opened the case, and the brake interlock failed, and he put a clamp down on a spinning platter stack and got his arm twisted off), but those brakes were nowhere near strong enough to stop the platters cold, and these were only a foot and a half across.

    The truth of this, however, is strange in and of itself. It was indeed possible to drop a platter stack in crooked, such that when you removed the clamp, closed the lid and spun them up the drive housing would start banging around like an out-of-balance washing machine. It was also possible to design seek programs for the step motor (the one that moves the head across the platter) such that you could cause the drive housing to move. With a properly designed progam and a near-felonious disregard for the equipment, you could move a drive housing several feet. I was privy to a contest some time ago where several programmers competed to try to get the drive housing to move to certain places in the lab (using an old, blown-out platter pack, of course, since we really didn't want to be wiping out a good one).

    Virg

  131. I've actually experienced it by mhenders40223 · · Score: 1

    I've actually had a CD explode in a CD drive! Sounded like a firecracker going off inside the computer and scared the shit out of me. Needless to say the drive was hosed after that.

  132. OK, I'll say it... by Observer · · Score: 1

    "It seems an awful lot of trouble to go to just to break a Britney Spears ringtone collection or an AOL beer coaster."

  133. The Slashdot Effect by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

    "Sorry guys, but this server is way to small to survive "THE SLASHDOT EFFECT".
    This page will be back online later..."

    DOH!!

    And I was really looking forward to reading it. Oh well.. bookmarked for later viewing :-(

    --
    Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
  134. Happened here by WarpedMind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We had one poor lady in our office who was trying to
    install a feature of MS Office from her CD-ROM. She stuck the thing in and after about 5 seconds there was a loud bang from the computer. She nearly hit the ceiling when she jumped.

    After checking signs of smoke and what not, we opened the CD tray and there was nothing but a shards. It had completely disintegrated into pieces no more than a couple cenitmeters long.

    Of course the drive was completely hosed after that. It just made a jingling noise with all the shards in the unit.

    Yet another fine M$ product - exploding CD's.

    1. Re:Happened here by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      Its a question of balance. The plastic is obviously of unequal density around the platter. This creates a harmonic vibration. Check all your cds for cracks starting at the center and radiating out. Make a copy of any cracked ones and retire them before they come apart. Or manufacturers could balance them before shipping.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  135. "Update:Yep, it's a dupe"? DELETE the article then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it that difficult?

  136. THIS IS INSIGHTFUL YOU GEEKS ?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the fuck is this insightful? I find it to be an offtopic troll. I wish I had moderator access. I would smack down all you geeks like the wino I beat last night.

  137. Re: Somebody told yoou HD's have hard vacuum by reezle · · Score: 1
    Re: Somebody told yoou HD's have hard vacuum in them?

    And You beleived them?

    'Ya big dummy...
  138. Re:better way - another way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So do your hands.

  139. We got a live one here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it so hard to copy and paste? Or do you surf with one hand so you can fist Cowboy Neel at the same time ?

  140. Spin Drives at 2,000 rpm's and you will get 10,000 by geekster_2000 · · Score: 0

    times the data transfer minimum.

    Oops !

    Oh, you need to be using 3D Volume Holographic Optical Storage with 100 year shelf life.

    http://colossalstorage.net

  141. Talk about force!! by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The old-style Aluminum-shell SCBA air tanks (used as an oxygen supply for firefighters) are only about 1mm thick...and they routinely carry air at a pressure of 22,000 psi.

    Those plastic fragments were able to crack open 1mm thick aluminum shielding! That means that the pressure those fragments applied was well in excess of 22,000 psi! Yikes!

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Talk about force!! by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      the pressure those fragments applied was well in excess of 22,000 psi
      at impact, yes. I don't see how you can be impressed, though? How about a punch hit with a hammer? Same principle.

    2. Re:Talk about force!! by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

      Compared to plastics designed for strength, CDs are very malleable. It requires a great deal of force in a very short period of time for a fragment to cause that kind of damage before deforming or shattering further.

      Gives me a new variation on an old idea for a Quake mod... :)

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    3. Re:Talk about force!! by Nate+Eldredge · · Score: 1

      Well, sure. Take a small force (from a flying plastic shard), divide it by an extremely small area (the point of the shard), and you get a very large pressure.

      Note also that metals are probably stronger when force is applied uniformly over the entire thing than when it's applied only in a single place.

  142. I was at my cousin's house when his 52x cd-rom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    drive shattered his diablo cd. Spun up normally, heard a vibration, then a spftt and a crashing sound, got a read error from windows. Had to pry the tray open with a screwdriver, completely splintered the cd.

  143. Wrong! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    It's a well known fact that the universe revolves around ME.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  144. Re:The next breakthrough... Won't spin. by NorthDude · · Score: 1

    What I would really like to see, is Compact Flash to become more affordable. Sandisk is already making 1gig CP and 2 gig CP has been annonce already. If they could be half as cheap as a CD, it would really be great. Imagine, instead of having this archaic floppy drive, you could have 1 or 2 gig storage in a square inch floppy.

    Now, I would use that rather then CD's anytime if it was cheaper...

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
  145. My two cents by i_am_pi · · Score: 1

    At school, some idiot stuck a cracked-in-half CD into a drive. It shattered in the drive and they had to remove quite a few shards after disassembling the drive completely. (this was the same group that took apart the printer that jammed. They got the printer back together but it jammed worse. They got a note from the tech saying "Disassembled printer and put it back together CORRECTLY. Do NOT take apart again.")

    Another time, someone put a music CD into a drive. The drive went BOOM, shot the faceplate across the room, and slowly ejected the remains of the music cd. It was shattered in many pieces.

    I've had my experience with exploding CD's in NON lab conditions.

    Pi

  146. Digibomber! by moyix · · Score: 1

    (Yes, the title is a gratuitous Neal Stephenson reference, thank you)

    How long before we see a virus designed to cause physical harm by making a CD explode?

  147. Bill Gates' eyes light up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cant wait for microsoft to read this, so they can explode my XP cd after i install next time.... hmm copy protection gone mad...

  148. A cd-rom I was working on...... by Hacker'sEdict · · Score: 1

    last week exployed right in front of my face! That sucked this thing was spinning so fast it sounded like a race car. Umfortunately one of my games was in the ROM.... fortunately the game really sucked but honestly don't ever try and get your cd to run faster than it is b/c fast cd-ROM = BOOM!!!

  149. Re:A faster way (2,466X) refuted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i read the same: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=31369&cid=3378 210

    but the replies insist that the scanning would take so long (because of the high resolution) that it would be faster to read off of the cd. also, the scanned image would be well over 650MB

  150. Re:Yet another "You have already covered this" rep by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    Kick ass, I said I would be redundant and I am.

    Now I'm going to say I'm a billionaire and that I drove a Ferrari to work.

    Can I be moderated to instant wealth and happiness please?

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  151. Yoko Ono has same effect by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Actually portable cd players and md players is banned from some airline companys.

    That is because they are afraid a terrorist will play Yoko Ono, not because of spinning breakage.

  152. Re:better way - another way by loconet · · Score: 2

    "... then take off across the room and explode on impact with the opposite wall. "

    Or your head!!!..

    --
    [alk]
  153. still /.'ed a day later.... by soap.xml · · Score: 1

    Sorry guys, but this server is way to small to survive "THE SLASHDOT EFFECT". This page will be back online later...

  154. Homeland Security Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    APP July 22, 2002
    A recent discovery by Homeland Security agents working with the FAA and CIA has determined that CD players have been imported into the US and sold for the last 3 years. These CD players, targeted mostly at teenagers and children, have been specifically modified to accept a RF signal that causes them to increase their rotation speed to 1000x necessary to play a CD.

    Agents suspect that US children are being turned into unknowing suicide bombers by having so many modified CD players operating at any time, that the chance that one is in an airplane when the RF signal is broadcasted is nearly 100%.

    As a strategic move, ALL CD players and CD's are now being confiscated at airports across the nation. Children possessing this terroristic equipment are being placed into foster care while their parents are detained under the new Patriot Act.

  155. Intel CDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work for tech support at intel and we had a whole batch of CDs that weren't made properly or somthing, and they'd explode in peoples drives! It was great having some dumb ass end user calling "Uhhhmm.. My Cd uhh... exploded, can I get a new one"

  156. Re:Seems that cd's also disintegrate at lower spee by KosovoYankee · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but funny you should mention Corel CDs - I had Wordperfect 7 explode inside a brand new Dell 32x one day in the office - split into 5 pieces. Luckily, no one was hurt, and we all went out to lunch.

    --
    - If This Peace Is Fictious, I Shall Destroy It
  157. Re:better way - fix old released code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always spin the hard disks faster than the speed of light so that I can go back in time and fix already released code bugs before the product is released.

    Works really well.

    I had a hard time convincing management to spend the $25,000 on the hight speed hard disks though.

  158. /. effect & responsible reporting by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    I'm the poster that submitted the orginal link.

    I felt bad the first time the site got /.'d. I wish there was some way to know if a site could handle the traffic, and then submit a google cache instead.

    Maybe before submitting a story, people should send an email letting the site know their page might be getting linked from slashdot?

    > ]. I know duplicate-URL checking wouldn't help everything
    I agree, even having a basic script which checked for duplicate urls would be welcome. Heck, make it per user configurabe.
    i.e.
    [x] Don't show duplicate stories

    Cheers

  159. 48x CLV CD-RW by BCoates · · Score: 2

    Don't burners always do CLV when writing? Are the 48x burners multilaser or someting? 48x would be ~25K RPM (about as fast as a 125x CAV reader, if my math is correct), which seems close to/over the limit.

    Are the media with higher speed advertised actually sturdier?

    --
    Benjamin Coates

  160. Scare the crap out of me! by beyond_the_blue · · Score: 1

    Here I am, reading the cached article on Google, when my CD-RW drive kicks open.

    After I had already leaped across the room and made a barricade out of my mattress, I remembered that I was burning an ISO of RH 7.3.

    Oh yeah, I'm cool. =]

    --
    "Sometimes you have fun, and sometimes the fun has you"
  161. Re:oops by ronnie_james_dio · · Score: 0

    many many uninformed idiots...

    --
    satan! SATAN! 54T4N! s4tAN! 5at4n!
  162. Don't fool yourself. by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

    Secondly, it wouldn't apply on the grounds that a cd shooting gun isn't a "firearm" the projectile is propelled without gunpowder, so there isn't as much regulation governing it

    Every state has it's own weapons laws. Note they are never called firearms laws, they are "weapon" laws, and are usually written ambiguiously enough to include most types of projectile weapons. Of course, it doesn't matter what the actual device is, if you use it to seriously injure or kill someone, it's considered a deadly weapon. A baseball bat is perfectly legal to own. You can even keep it in your back seat without much hassles from police. Yet as soon as you jump out of your car and pull that bat, it becomes a deadly weapon and you are much worse of for having it.

    The CD gun is no different. If he kills the squirrel, he's can be charged with weapons violations (as well as cruelty to animals for not killing them with an approved method of hunting, maybe also hit with hunting out of season and poaching fines). Just as if he'd killed the squirrel by knocking it out of the tree with a paint pellet originally designed for the gun. As long as he doesn't use it illegally or recklessly, he should be ok, but no telling where a cop draws the line when it comes to "recklessly" and arrests him for endangerment.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  163. Re:oops by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1
    HTML? Sorry, I'm not a programmer.

    HTML?? Programmer?? If anyone calls themselves a programmer because they know HTML, they should be shot. HTML is more like low level word processing.

  164. Re: Bannage (BONDAGE) target? by Sassinak · · Score: 1

    Obviously then, you haven't taken a Delta ComAir Flight recently then.. The naked part is the only thing that hasn't occured.. (and if that starts happening, then they need to charge for looks.. (I'm sorry, your just TOO ugly to be in first class.. but we have a nice "L" class ticket near the bathroom for you.

    --
    God made the Idiot for practice, and then He made the School Board -- Mark Twain Look for http://Thebar.steelbeachca
  165. Not news to me... by cwm9 · · Score: 1

    A couple of years ago at Christmas my brother needed a new CD-ROM drive. After looking around, I settled on a new 52x drive from Lite-On and a new game to use in it.

    On christmas day we installed the drive and played the game for a few hours. The drive was fast, but it sounded a bit too much like a jet preparing for takeoff. The game would occasionally lock up briefly - something we thought was due to the software, until eventually we heard a funny whining noise followed by a very frightening vibration succeeded by one second of loud banging terminating in one VERY loud explosion. The front of the CD drive was bent down, and bits of flying plastic shot across the room.

    We couldn't believe it. Talk about pounding hearts! The drive door wouldn't open, and it was apparant the new drive was toast. I collected the fragments of CD, uninstalled the new drive (which now made a nice "rain stick" rattling noise when shaken), and returned both the game and the drive to CompUSA telling them of our experience. We told them that the fragments flew all the way across the room AFTER ripping open the front of the drive - and still made marks on the wall!

    We warned them that the drives were extremely dangerous. Our computer just happens to be mounted at eye level - and my brother just happened to have just moved his chair from that location. The legal implicaitons were clear... After rattling the drive for them and showing the bits and pieces of the game CD, they hapilly refunded the purchase price of both.

    An e-mail was sent to technical support explaining what happened, along with the serial number of the drive we had purchased.

    We never did get a reply from the manufacturer, but we did return a week later to CompUSA and found the drives had been mysteriously withdrawn from the shelves without so much as a whisper.

    We opted to spend the money on a Yamaha multi-pickup drive instead. It was extremely quiet, faster than the 52x drive I purchased originally, and best of all - it didn't throw cd fragment across the room at alarming speeds.

    -cwm9

  166. CD Seek Time by Sherman22 · · Score: 1

    Well one thing they could to to increase the seek time, which is one of the most important factors in drive performance, honestly, ripping a track in about 30 seconds is good enough for me, is including more than one read head, placed on opposite sides of the disc, this would effectevly cut the seek time in half, when the bit of data that it needs just passed the head, it wouldn't have to wait a whole nother revolution, just half of one. (Patent Pending)

  167. Way offtopic by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    I'm not ducking out, but this thread has made a 90 degree turn from the topic only four messages back.
    Could someone please mod down this and the last three messages in this thread? It's really just pointless bickering between two people who can't bear not to have the last word.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Way offtopic by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm so sorry for interrupting the rivetting and intellectual conversation on blowing the shit out of CDs.

      Get back to me(in another thread, I give up here, the "nuke this thread" defense is almost as hard to counter as the chewbacca defense) when your mind learns that a straight line is not always the most productive way to reach point C from point A(ie. life, like this conversation, is full of interesting detours, don't shut them out just because it strays from the path).

      Being a pseudo-intellectual is fun!

      --
      It's been a long time.
    2. Re:Way offtopic by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      I actually tried to email you, but the email link on your site doesn't work. Do you have one I can reach you at?

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    3. Re:Way offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one at the top, powerusrsgaming@yahoo.ca works.

      SJ Zero
      Powerusrs Gaming
      http://powerusr.sphosting.com/

      I'm posting anonymously to keep the least number of eyes on my sites address(only readers really need to contact me).

    4. Re:Way offtopic by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      okay now, mod that message right back down. What part of "pseudo-intellectual" didn't you understand?

      I'd swear sometimes that there are no actual moderators, and that a random number generator takes care of mods...

      --
      It's been a long time.
    5. Re:Way offtopic by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      yeep...I just looked at the mods. If the address I gave you doesn't work, lets continue whatever conversation needs to take place on the sites board -- this just isn't fair to you. mods shouldn't take sides like that. It's nice to know they think I'm right, but three +1 interestings vs. a -1 troll? damn!

      I do believe, after all the crack-addled antics I've seen tonight, I won't be posting much on slashdot any longer, if at all. There are better sites out there which allow a difference in opinion to run it's course.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  168. mirror. by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

    Call me what you want, its been down all day- here is a google cache of the site...

    http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:UaTCrUMQitY C: www.qedata.se/e_js_n-cdrom.htm+&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

    -k

  169. Nah... by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

    That's what this is for.

  170. why spin it at all? by frovingslosh · · Score: 2
    Never got to see the original page, it was slashdoted, then put up a message that it was down for a while due to the /. attention.

    People have mentioned that some drives use multiple read pickups rather than high rotational speed, but I've been wondering why we have to spin the media at all. Wouldn't it be possible to read the disk by using some spinning mirrors to rotate the optical path around the CD instead? Perhaps it's a space issue, or a need to keep the pickup close to the CD, but it just strikes me that the technology is limiting itself by following designs based on older technology (like 78rpm records!)

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:why spin it at all? by Meowing · · Score: 1

      "a need to keep the pickup close to the CD is close enough of an explanation. Basically, the closer you are to the surface, the less critical it is you get the angles just right to capture the reflections. It's one thing to get this worked out on a single unit, but it gets messy once you start worrying about mass production.

    2. Re:why spin it at all? by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      Ok, why not use the same technology in (Texas Instrument based) DLP projector chips? Spin the disk at a slow speed and scan it with multiple split beams directed with a simplified DLP chip? Or scan a stationary disk using a higher density of (split) beams manipulated with a full fledged, higher density DLP chip, redirected to a specialized CCD of sorts. The end effect would be a drive with, say, 60,000 pseudo-read heads (use a 300x200 DLP and CCD...60,000 beams in theory).

      This is more difficult to do with existing technology because why?

      Pyramid

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
  171. Jorgen's UFO Sensor by vortexau · · Score: 1

    What I found of interest at that site was Jorgen's story (and data) of his UFO Magnetic Field Sensor.
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
    1. Re:Jorgen's UFO Sensor by vortexau · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that! Try this.
      .

      --
      (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  172. Since the site is down by BuggyBoyWA · · Score: 1

    Since the website is down, go here to see a cache from Google: http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:UaTCrUMQitYC: www.qedata.se/e_js_n-cdrom.htm+&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

  173. Four foot disk by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    I can attest to the existence of four foot disks. I saw a four foot platter at Lawrence Livermore Labs about 1985. It was on its way to the LLL museum. The drive no longer existed but someone had saved the platter, which was 1/4" aluminum four feet in diameter, leaning against the wall in a hallway. IIRC it was a one megabyte disk, built about 1950. I don't know the rotation speed.

    My first programming was on IBM 1130 computers with a 12" 1 MB Winchester built-in disk drive with a single removable platter and one second seek time (and a massive 16K or 32K Core memory!!)

    The "washing machines" with 5-platter removable cartridges had 5 horsepower stepping motors, and could definitely walk across a room when a lot of seeks were being done. Some folks resorted to tieing them down.

    Someone back then found that the disk I/O signal caused noise on a transistor radio set on the console, and wrote an assembler program that modulated the disk I/O to play music. It even took simple music data (via cards). I don't think this was the first computer music, but it was early.

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  174. autodestructing CD - has happened by Zurgutt · · Score: 1
    I know a guy who had CD exploding in the drive. He got a russian black-market CD with (supposedly) pirated games from someone and put it into drive and autorun it. It displayed a message box with text saying something along lines "this CD is illegal and will be destroyed" few seconds after closing the box there was a loud cracking noise and he shut down computer, frightened by it. After closer investigation he found the cdrom drive full of CD fragments.

    The cd had looked quite normal, pressed type. I have no idea of how this could be accomplished by software, except by exploiting some bug in hardware and overspinning/prematurely releasing the cd.

  175. Hit the ground, or floor: Which? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't get it.

    You say, "...it'll hit the ground, stand due to gyroscope effect while the edge melts against the ground enough to get traction, then take off across the room and explode on impact with the opposite wall."

    As far as I know, the ground is the surface of Mother Earth; you should be able to dig it up and plant things in it and have them grow. However, you refer to walls. Maybe you live in a house with a dirt floor?

  176. Multiple read heads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Are you sure? One design, marketed by Kenwood, iirc, uses a holographic beam splitter to create 7 reading beams. I don't know details, though; must be fun to reassemble the data (and move to new data once it's been read).

    Read heads and their drives aren't cheap, I'd expect; I doubt there would be more than one actual head. Multiple beams, maybe.

  177. Kenwood does not use multiple read heads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They use a splitter that creates seven beams from one laser. Apparently each beam has its own photosensor. I don't know much beyond that, though.

  178. Re: Somebody told yoou HD's have hard vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the first hard drives were in a greatly reduced pressure state. You could actually change the platters out. You would spin the disk down and park the heads, release the vacuum, crack open the drive and swap platters. Pump the air back out and you were ready to go. These were used in the pre PC days and the disks were usually about 18 inches accross or so. I actually know a computer that is still functioning that uses those drives. Neat huh?

  179. centrifugal forces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in theory if you spin anything fast enough, it's own weight will tear it apart. In the case of a HD platter, I'm not too sure, I'd want fragments of steel or glass travelling across my room, let alone at speed

  180. Last Post and OnTopic! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    Woohoo! I claim the Last Post!

    Why not use a grocery-style scanner to speed up access times? You can cover the whole disk with a spinning mirror, and keep the Rpms down at a resonable level.