Slashdot Mirror


Perens Backs Down from DMCA Violation

liquidsin writes "According to this article by Dan Gillmor, Bruce Perens has backed out of his plan to demonstrate how to modify a DVD player to break region coding (and openly violate the DMCA as well) due to pressure from his employer, Hewlett Packard. I wish HP had given him their blessing on this, but I guess they have to worry about shareholders first..." See our previous story for Perens' plans.

352 comments

  1. Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    (A/C'ed)

    Posted on Thu, Jul. 25, 2002
    Copyright Law Thwarts Open Source Confab Demo
    Posted by Dan Gillmor

    Bruce Perens was going to demonstrate a modified DVD player at this week's Open Source gathering in San Diego. He'd planned to show (Infoworld) how a DVD player with its regional coding disabled could play DVDs with different regional codes.

    Perens was going to do this in violation, he believed, of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which bans the circumvention of technological methods to protect copyrighted material from uses the owner doesn't want. And the possibility of legal trouble led his employer, Hewlett-Packard, to ask him not to do the demonstration.

    HP funds Perens to pursue a variety of free software projects. He was willing to take the legal risks himself, he told me today, but HP worried that it would be "a more juicy target," the kind of deep pockets that might make the entertainment cartel drool. In that context it's understandable why HP would be concerned, though I wish the company would take a stand on the right side of this issue.

    So while Perens is going to talk about the DMCA's pernicious impact on things like free software, he's not going to give his demonstration. A shame, but that's how things are going these days.

    Hollywood is winning, folks. You are losing. And you'd better start caring.

    1. Re:Article by uncoveror · · Score: 2

      Bruce Perens should at least give a speech about how it theoretically could be done instead of demonstrating it, or read the presentation Edward Felten was intimidated into not giving, If Felten would be willing to share it. Any one who wants to be sure not to violate the DMCA can read this article, and avoid a senseless blunder that might get them into hot water.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    2. Re:Article by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

      He shouldn't put himself in legal trouble. That just more money that lawyers are able to pocket. Just post it up everywhere on those free web hosting services, and just get Google to cache it. There, the cat's out of the box and the lawyers have no one to go after. Everyone wins.

    3. Re:Article by CuppaJoe · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hollywood is winning, folks. You are losing. And you'd better start caring.

      I'm confused. Hollywood is winning because they expect to be compensated for their work? And we're losing because we're actually expected to pay for things we use? I suppose demonstrating how to get a shopping cart of food out of the grocery store without paying for it would be a "stand on the right side of the issue"?

      These digital protections are in place to protect artists and creators from having their work stolen. Region coding in particular prevents China, e.g., from flooding the US markets with their pirated DVDs and undercutting the whole industry.

      Sure, sometimes these protections and laws can catch a few dolphins in their tuna nets, so to speak, but in general they're there for a reason. I'm sure there are plenty of people who can (and probably will) point out how some of these protections prevent legitimate activities (such as making archival copies for personal use, etc.), but all of these activities get abused by greedy, dishonest people. Only thieves and pirates would have a genuine need to circumvent them.

    4. Re:Article by DigitalKyle · · Score: 1

      "I'm confused. Hollywood is winning because they expect to be compensated for their work? And we're losing because we're actually expected to pay for things we use?" So, even after we pay 'Hollywood' money for a product, you think we should only be able to view/use it how they see fit? I shouldn't be able to move out of the USA to Japan, and watch my American DVD's over there? I shouldn't be able to make a video file server for my home, where I have gigs of video on demand of some of my most watched movies? Good thinking buddy. Punish all just to get the bad ones.

    5. Re:Article by arbofnot · · Score: 1

      Some of the posters here do not seem to understand the evil absurdity of the idea that the US government, on behalf of Hollywood studios, might ensure that you do not watch Eyes Wide Shut as Stanley Kubrick intended, may not view Orson Welles' film MacBeth on DVD, and cannot see David Lynch's Lost Highway in its correct aspect ratio, backed with the threat of physical force.

      If the movie industry insists that some obstacles must exist to keep movies in their intended market areas, or that companies must be discouraged from actively marketing and distributing copies of films in markets in which they do not have distribution rights, that makes some degree of business sense. What is offensive is the idea that governments may threaten physical force and detention of those who would work around the technical measures the movie companies use.

    6. Re:Article by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1

      purpledinoz wrote:

      > He shouldn't put himself in legal trouble. That
      > just more money that lawyers are able to pocket.

      It's called civil disobedience. By publicly violating the law and accepting the consequences (arrest, trial, possible jail time), he would have painted a much more vivid picture for the people on just how unfair and stupid this law is. If he was really careful on how he did it, he might have created just the test case that is needed to get the DMCA declared unconstitutional.

      > Just post it up everywhere on those free web
      > hosting services, and just get Google to cache
      > it. There, the cat's out of the box and the
      > lawyers have no one to go after. Everyone wins.

      You are missing the point by several light years. This isn't about the thing he was going to present. It is about protesting, and possibly stopping, a stupid and unjust law.

      Besides, if he did as you suggest, the law might still catch up to him, more privately. If it didn't, it could still take Google and the free web hosting service to court for DMCA violations.

      "The path of peace is yours to discover for eternity."
      "Mosura", 1961

    7. Re:Article by arbofnot · · Score: 1

      These digital protections are in place to protect artists and creators from having their work stolen. Region coding in particular prevents China, e.g., from flooding the US markets with their pirated DVDs and undercutting the whole industry.

      How is it stealing from an artist or a content company if you purchase a legitimate Region 1 DVD and play it in Europe? Or a Region 2,3,4,5,6 DVD in the USA?

      Region codes do nothing to prevent Chinese companies from flooding the US markets with region-free DVDs.

    8. Re:Article by hping · · Score: 1

      As I recall the regioncode is to prevent the sale of the discs outside the region. In Europe movies are generally released for the theatre as in the US the disc come at the same time on the market, a lag of about 6 to 8 months. So it is not theft to play an disc with another regioncode in ypour DVD, it is the protection of the purse of the owner which make it impossible to do so. It is also a means to control the market, because delivery of the discs is now regulated by the distributor, who do defenitly not like self-import of discs.

      So is de coding of the contents of the disc. It is to prevent the viewing of the disc when you have not payed your dues to the distributor. M$ pays the RCAA (or the party who collects the duties for playing a CDVD/CD) out of the money they make for their OS, I do not know about Apple's policy, but Linux cannot do this, due to the fact that the OS is free for grabs and who would be the responsible party to pay. I do think that the payment for the player in the PC should be including the payment to the RCAA, so we do not have to use software as DeCSS, because we can then do it legally.

  2. this sucks by t0rnt0pieces · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I still can't figure out how to make my aopen dvd region free!

    --
    Karma: Excellent (In Soviet Russia, karma pimps YOU)
    1. Re:this sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a clue then.

    2. Re:this sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As far as I can tell, DVD players LEGITIMATELY sold in Mexico are all "open region." Mexico is so close to the U.S. market and overwhelmed by it that any DVD player that couldn't play region 1 would fail. At the same time, Blockbuster rents region 4 DVDs so any DVD player needs to be able to handle that, too.

      I don't know from first-hand experience. All I have is a VHS player that I use once or twice per year to watch movies. My laptop came with a DVD/CD player, but all I've used it for is to install software. For my entertainment needs, I watch DirectTV. Which is also free in Mexico. :)

  3. HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by krog · · Score: 5, Funny

    so, let me get this straight. he intended to explain DVD region circumvention in order to publicly disobey an authority.... then an authority said "don't do that". so he won't.

    just wanted to grab some headlines, i guess...

    1. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by bafreer · · Score: 0
      A man should only stand by his beliefs if he can still assure his livelihood.

      Marge, they have the interent on computers now!

    2. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Manitcor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It just so happens that the authority that told him not too also pays his bills.

      Funny how prison may not seem so bad (espically to those that dont think they will go or have never been) but when you threaten someones livelyhood ideas can change quick.

      Im sure the conversation went something to the effect that if he gives his presentation that he will not work for any major computer company again. In this economy the last thing a tech worker needs is to be black listed.

      Though I wish he would go through with it I can understand his motivations not to. Im sure hes not happy about the whole situation either.

      --
      "Don't mess with him, he taunts the happy fun ball."
    3. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by mblase · · Score: 1, Insightful

      then an authority said "don't do that". so he won't.

      Well, it wasn't a government authority, it was a capitalist one. Which I suppose says more about his convictions than we'd like to know.

    4. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a publicity stunt from the beginning, so I guess he planned it this way. If he didn't, I have to ask this question: How stupid do you have to be to plan a publicity stunt like that without taking your employer's position into account?

    5. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "so, let me get this straight. he intended to explain DVD region circumvention in order to publicly disobey an authority.... then an authority said "don't do that". so he won't."

      Maybe it's because he respects the authority of his employer Hewlett-Packard and the results of possibly getting fired a bit more strongly than he disrespects the values behind the DMCA.

    6. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Manitcor · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it was a publicity stunt, or maybe it wasn't. Some people can be extremely intelligent and then do some extremely boneheaded things like assume your employer would not get involved in this.

      So questions should be asked to determins such intent:

      Was the presentation he was to give in any way connected to or endorsed by HP?

      Did he believe that by making such a presentation even if un-connected to his employer that an arrest and possible criminal conviction would not affect his job or his employers reputation in the indusrty?

      Even the smart sometimes fail to plan and see all the angles (remember hindsight is 20/20). Only Prens knows for sure.

      --
      "Don't mess with him, he taunts the happy fun ball."
    7. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Plutor · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the parent: "Well, it wasn't a government authority, it was a capitalist one. Which I suppose says more about his convictions than we'd like to know."
      (Implying that Bruce is only concerned with Money)

      From the article: "HP funds Perens to pursue a variety of free software projects."
      (Explaining the Bruce was concerned with his ability to continue working on your free software)

    8. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by gallen1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know the details of his relationship with HP but it might be better to say: An authority with whom he has a mutually beneficial relationship based on mutual respect asked him not to put them at risk.

      Since, according to the article, HP is funding his other free software projects this could also be viewed as a request not to bite the hand that feeds him.

      This article also says that HP 'asked him' not to give the presentation. Quite differnt from "don't do that"

    9. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Soko · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Then again, do we know what would of happened to all those OSS projets funded by HPAQ if he had of gone through with this? Where would Perl be?

      Swallowing his pride may of been the lesser of 2 evils. It most certainly isn't a black and white situation. Grow up.

      HP likely said "Put those huge balls back in your pants. You'll get to use them later - in spades."

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    10. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Arandir · · Score: 4, Funny

      Without knowing what HP told him, we'll never know.

      It could have been something as simple as "you know, our legal insurance doesn't cover willful, premeditated, and pre-announced violations of the law. If you get arrested you'll have to pay for your own defense. But don't worry, when you get out in ten years your old job will still be waiting for you..."

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    11. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by unformed · · Score: 2

      Well, it wasn't a government authority, it was a capitalist one. Which I suppose says more about his convictions than we'd like to know.

      Even though still going ahead and violating the DMCA would be cooler, he's got a much higher priority to his family.

      If my company threatened to fire me for an action I was planning on committing, guess what? I'll listen up.

      However, I -don't- know the specifics, so there's no real argument, just offering a possibility...

    12. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he just quite naturally felt that it would be wrong to put others at risk for his own actions.

    13. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by thales · · Score: 5, Insightful
      NOT performing a action that could cause damage to an inocent third party that has aided him says a lot about his convictions.

      Your snide insinuation also says a lot about your convictions

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    14. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Ovidius · · Score: 1

      It might also be that he is concerned about his actions bringing harm to others. Civil disobedience is one thing when you are taking risks only for yourself. Perhaps he was willing to risk being fired, but still had to consider if it was fair for him to put HP in legal jeopardy over a stand he was making on his own principles.

    15. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by ichimunki · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I don't see how HP can "blacklist" him. That would point to major collusion among computer manufacturers bordering if not overstepping the bounds of legality altogether.

      However, the discussion probably went more like "We're going to fire you even if you take this on and don't get thrown in jail, because we'd rather not be associated with such things-- it hurts our credibility with Congress and industry groups to have prominent employees flouting the law."

      --
      I do not have a signature
    16. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by zangdesign · · Score: 2

      Have you ever heard the proverb "Don't shit where you eat"? If Bruce had gone through with his demo, HP would most certainly (not could have been, but most certainly) be sued for way more money than you, me, and half the people on /. would ever see in a lifetime. While money may be meaningless to you, some of us need it to do those oh-so-important things like eat, put a roof over our heads, drive to work, pay for childcare, etc..

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    17. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Manitcor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well it would not be something as an official black list but imagine your a manager at a competing company and Prens comes in for a job.

      Any manager would have major reservations about hiring someone who would openly and publicy go aginst his employers wishes to possible deteiment to the employer.

      If he were to go through with it then get hired somewhere else then pull the same kind of thing, then it would not be only him but the higher ups would prob point thier fingers at the guy that hired him as well.

      --
      "Don't mess with him, he taunts the happy fun ball."
    18. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by tmark · · Score: 2

      just wanted to grab some headlines, i guess..

      It does seem like that, doesn't it. I mean, you HAVE to believe someone as savvy as Perens would have thought to bounce this off HP legal first, before making a big, splashy statement ?

    19. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by MissMyNewton · · Score: 1
      Well, it wasn't a government authority, it was a capitalist one.

      So...

      He's not afraid of The Man, but he IS afraid of The Woman...

      --

      ---

      Information wants...you to shut your pie hole.

    20. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 2

      Or maybe he just felt getting HP to suffer for HIS civil disobedience was dishonorable.

    21. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To quote the mythical Jubal Harshaw:

      "A government funded artist is an unprincipled whore!"

      Same goes for Bruce. If he backed down because HP told him not to then he just sold out, pure and simple. It matters not what he does at HP. Wave bye bye to credibility, Bruce.

    22. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      NOT performing a action that could cause damage to an inocent third party that has aided him says a lot about his convictions.
      To be sure, the federal government which passed the DCMA has certainly given him plenty of aid throughout his life. But don't you find it ironic that he's willing to go to jail to protest the DCMA, but not give up a paycheck?

      (Let's all be realistic, anyways -- if he'd decided to go ahead with his DCMA protest, HP likely would have pulled his presentation entirely to save their own face, and POSSIBLY fired him as well. Nothing would have been gained by anyone.)
    23. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In the words of the immortal Rorschach...

      NEVER COMPROMISE

    24. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Insightful
      we'd rather not be associated with such things-- it hurts our credibility with Congress and industry groups to have prominent employees flouting the law.

      Which is a perfectly respectable position. Fighting law on moral grounds needs to be done two ways - the disobediants and the inside the system. Otherwise, you have either no visibility or no hope of change no matter how outrageous your acts are. One of the best dual systems in tech is 2600 and the EFF. Outside tech, you have multiple examples of activists and the ACLU.

      As important as the activists might be, every Hoffman needs his Lefcourt. The media makes up the third end of the tripod of change, whether it be big media, or just plain word of mouth.

      If you think the less of Bruce for this, I'm sure he would let you get up on stage and do it yourself. Are you willing to go to jail and spend the next year in court for your convictions?

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    25. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If my company threatened to fire me for an action I was planning on committing, guess what? I'll listen up.

      even if when you were planning the act you realised that the act was illegal, would land you in a world of legal trouble, including possible jail time, and possibly prevent you from getting good work in the future?

      seems to indicate he didnt think his actions all the way through.

      "hey boss im gonna do illegal stuff"
      "if you do that we'll fire you"
      "oh, gee, hadnt thought of that"

    26. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, it wasn't a government authority, it was a capitalist one. Which I suppose says more about his convictions than we'd like to know.

      Oh bullshit. That's easy for you to say while you sit around on an obscure web forum and anonymously denounce "the Man". Let's see you risk your personal freedom and familiy's well-being so that geeks everywhere can download free music.

      I think the DMCA is a dangerous law too, but I don't have the balls to publicly (and illegally) flout it. And since you don't either, you should probably keep the snide comments to yourself.

    27. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If you think the less of Bruce for this, I'm sure he would let you get up on stage and do it yourself. Are you willing to go to jail and spend the next year in court for your convictions?

      Assuming that I could count on getting legal support from the EFF, yes.

    28. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to fund me so I can work on your free software too?

    29. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      So talk to them. I would imagine they would support you. Probably not pro bono, but you're not worried about that, I assume.

      Just be aware that just because you have legal support does not mean you will win. You might wind up with $1.2 million dollars worth of debt and be on probation for a few years, ready to be yanked to jail for a minor offense.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    30. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by KeyserDK · · Score: 1

      Yes very willing. But then again i live in denmark.

      In short, I can buy a regionfree dvd player but i can't marry a foreigner and live with her here, since i'm not 23. Then i need a "proper" house, which wont happen since i'm surely still a student.... oops wrong tropic =)

      Stupid immigration laws

      --
      still reading?
    31. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Pro bono is exactly what I mean. I'd be willing to forego an income and even my freedom for a while, I would expect to have a few lawyers forego their fees.

    32. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by sterno · · Score: 2

      If you think the less of Bruce for this, I'm sure he would let you get up on stage and do it yourself. Are you willing to go to jail and spend the next year in court for your convictions?

      Nope, that's what, when I break the law, I do so in the comfort of my own home :). But this does give me an idea...

      What about taking this to a new level. Do a mass violation of the DMCA. Arrange for a gathering of hundreds or thousands of geeks and have them all, simultaneously, do exactly what Bruce was planning to do. Are they going to try to arrest all of these people? I'd like to see them try...

      --
      This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    33. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

      I think the DMCA is a dangerous law too, but I don't have the balls to publicly (and illegally) flout it. And since you don't either, you should probably keep the snide comments to yourself.

      One of many reasons this country is going (actually , is already there) into the shitter.

      --
      -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
    34. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by abe+ferlman · · Score: 2

      With power comes responsibility.

      You may not have the balls to flout your naughty bits, but then you don't have the attention of the press when you do so either. Perens, as an HP exec and open source/free software elder, does have that attention.

      It is precisely what he has to lose, and who he is, that makes his message so powerful. A real shame that he's backed down.

      --
      microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    35. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Again - what the fuck have you done, Ghandi?

    36. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Lemmy, I'm right behind you. I can't wait to pound that sweet ass with my 12" Black as night cock and listen to you scream with pleasure.

      Your loving inmate,
      Bubba McWallace

    37. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know about you, but I have been hit with batons and risked jail time for causes I believe in before. Don't project your own indifference and fear onto everyone else.

    38. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by parliboy · · Score: 2
      As important as the activists might be, every Hoffman needs his Lefcourt. The media makes up the third end of the tripod of change, whether it be big media, or just plain word of mouth.

      Except that the third tripod of big media is intertwined with technology (MSNBC, AOL-TW, etc, etc.) Therefore, with only two legs left on the tripod, we can only assume that the whole structure will come crumbling down.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    39. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 2

      just wanted to grab some headlines, i guess...

      Maybe he had not realized beforehand that he'd bring quite a few colleages (perhaps even friends) in a very difficult situation. We don't know.

    40. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Courageous · · Score: 2

      "Im sure the conversation went something to the effect that if he gives his presentation that he will not work for any major computer company again."

      I'd sure like to catch an employer giving me that conversation on tape. That way I'd never HAVE to work for any major computer company again.

      LOL.

      C//

    41. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did they pass the Dumb Cunt Mastrabatory Act?

      Why wasn't I informed?!

      I'm off to exercies my right to mastrabate my dumb cunt.

    42. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by NorthDude · · Score: 1

      Nobody's forcing you...

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    43. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who the f*** is moderating this and tagged this main thread as funny? you guys need some serious brain examination

    44. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      thales writes:
      " NOT performing a action that could cause damage to an inocent third party that has aided him says a lot about his convictions. Your snide insinuation also says a lot about your convictions "

      While I agree with the first statement fully, I think the second might be a little harsh. It appears, to me, to be just a case of not thinking very deeply on what was actually going on rather than malice.

      Or maybe he was just blinded by the possibility of racking up karma with a pseudo-witty, biting, and obvious attack on Perens so early in the history of the thread. =)

      Not flaming you, it's just my experience that often what appears as malace is really just ignorance so I tend to assume the latter.

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    45. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
      Yuk yuk. HP felt that it would not be possible to decouple the company from my actions - and that damage to their Linux program would likely take place if I went ahead with my efforts. That program does nice things for Samba, Debian, LSB, etc. So, I had to prioritize. I made my point against DMCA, as what went down with HP was a pretty good demonstration of its chilling effect on free speech. A better demonstration, indeed, than if I had done my trivial DMCA violation and got away with it. I'll continue to work on this. It would be nice if you would, too.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    46. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
      There were no blacklist threats. I became convinced that I'd hurt HP's Linux program if I went ahead. My boss was very considerate, he even flew out to give a preamble to my talk explaining HP's position.

      Bruce

    47. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      I'll ride against the DMCA again, don't worry. The problem today was that it would have hurt HP's Linux program, hardly the desired effect.

      Bruce

    48. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      No. Consulting HP would have involved them. I still think that their best response would have simply have been to disavow the action, as they disavow opinions that I clearly identify as my own and not theirs all of the time. But they felt that they could not decouple the potential for HP to be harmed from my actions. Harming their Linux program would have resulted in a net negative effect, not the positive one I desired. What we got instead was an effective demonstration of DMCA's chilling effect. I'll continue to attack it.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    49. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit, Sherlock. The expression "never have to work again," is a coloquialism for "so rich, you don't have to work." Duh.

      C//

    50. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by AME · · Score: 2
      Being hit with batons and risking jail time for your preferred causes doesn't necessarily make you a hero.

      It's difficult to tell, not knowing what those causes are, and not knowing what you did to effect being beaten and possibly imprisoned. And that's assuming that your statement is even true.

      --
      "I have a good idea why it's hard to verify programs. They're usually wrong." --Manuel Blum, FOCS 94
    51. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      I got beaten for being in a sit-in on a campus in the eighties. It was a cause that probably 80 percent of the people would at least feel was worthwhile, but that's not the issue. It's not a question of whether I'm a hero or not: I don't care whether you think I'm a hero. And the causes that I would fight for now aren't the causes I was fighting for then, either: I'm more mature now than I was then, and I would probably look at the person I was then and think I was being a little simplistic. It's simply that it's possible to take a stand and not be afraid of getting hurt if you believe in the cause. My grandfather, from Peru, was a hero in my book - he didn't just risk a few lumps and cuts and a couple nights in jail, he was pursued by death squads and lived several years in exile while trying to fight for his principles (which happened to be for democracy, against military dictator Odria) - his children, including my Mom, used to get smuggled across the border just to visit him. He spent a lot of time in jail - although that was an era when, really, one educated and committed person with some determination really could change a society, especially a society like Peru's. Not only do I not have his energy, I don't live in the same times as his, so I don't think I could ever be a hero on that level.

      But I'm arguing against cowardice and complacency, not to impress you. You should be asking yourself what's possible for you do to, not simply trying to debunk anyone who might be doing more.

    52. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by AME · · Score: 1
      Apparently, some people spent their time at university attending sit-ins instead of attending classes where they might have learnt something of proper apologetics.

      I shall not further respond in this thread, but rather bring the matter full circle by declaring:

      I stand completely with Mr. Perens on this issue. His foreward-looking decision exemplifies restraint, dignity, and thoughtful consideration. It does not demonstrate any form of cowardice or greed.

      --
      "I have a good idea why it's hard to verify programs. They're usually wrong." --Manuel Blum, FOCS 94
    53. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bruce, before you make any more public speeches, here's a practical bit of advice for you: TAKE SOME PUBLIC SPEAKING LESSONS!

      Oh, and, take some assertiveness training too. When you are speaking you look like a neurotic dog who's owner has beaten up with a newspaper one too many times.

    54. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's insightful. No, really, I just had a tingle go down my spine, like, "Wow, I've never heard someone describe the plight of our nation so eloquently." Thank you for your inspirational words!

    55. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by NorthDude · · Score: 1

      My answer was pretty elementary, Dear Watson...
      There is a difference between never working again and not working again for a mega-corporation.
      I had never accepted to work for any major company, and I'm doing fine with small 15-20 employee company.

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    56. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by unitron · · Score: 2
      "Are they going to try to arrest all of these people?"

      Perhaps you've noticed the recent discussion of modifying a certain Reconstruction-era law in order to allow the military to be used domestically for certain police functions?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    57. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by unitron · · Score: 3, Funny

      So instead go up there with a small tape recorder rigged to throw a puff of smoke and a tape with Carly saying "Should you or any of your team be captured of killed, the board of directors will disavow any knowledge of your actions.".

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    58. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only point you made is you will stand up for freedom up until the point you may have to sacrifice. I am glad our founding fathers had a little more guts than you.

      Those willing to give up a little liberty for a little security deserve neither security nor liberty. - Benjamin Franklin

    59. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by maxpublic · · Score: 2

      If you aren't willing to go to jail you have no convictions.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    60. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      HP felt that it would not be possible to decouple the company from my actions - and that damage to their Linux program would likely take place if I went ahead with my efforts.

      Is there anyone who is not connected with HP and would be willing and able to do the presentation in your place? Would that sufficiently decouple it from HP?

    61. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Courageous · · Score: 2

      The _size_ of a company wouldn't change a thing. I still have a house payment, still have to buy food, still need money for fun. I _have_ to work. But if an employer said something like that to me, I _wouldn't_ have to work. I still _would_ work, mind you, I'd just do things that are more fun.

      C//

    62. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to violate the DMCA on stage in front of everyone in order to make a stand against it.
      Back under your bridge.

    63. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wish to give advice on communication you might like to sort out your own lack of communicative abilities first.

    64. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rephrase that: "Bruce was concerned with his ability to continue working on his free software"

    65. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by ichimunki · · Score: 2
      A little late in replying, but I don't think less of Bruce Perens for not doing this. I was just trying to elucidate the conversation in such a way that made HP's likely stance a lot gentler. The parent post made them sound like drooling jackals... and I wanted to point out that if they let him do this, they lose credibility as they (to quote you) work within the system.

      And yes, I am willing to go to jail and spend the next year in court for my convictions. Except that in this case I see no reason to do that, I simply avoid DVDs altogether. Problem solved.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    66. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      And yes, I am willing to go to jail and spend the next year in court for my convictions. Except that in this case I see no reason to do that, I simply avoid DVDs altogether. Problem solved.

      Since the thead has tapered off, I figured I'd toss in a final thought that I personally would not go to jail over this right now. I don't think it's quite necessary at this juncture; your opinion may vary, but the DMCA is getting hammered and chipped away slowly in court cases. If I had a family and kids, I wouldn't even consider going to jail over DVDs at all. Of course, if it were something like the right to critisize your government in public writings that was at stake, I'd go to jail rather than stay silent. I have convictions that are strong enough to warrent an illegal action on moral grounds, I just don't think DVD regioning is worth it, nor is it necessary in that particular fight. The DMCA as a whole is on very uncertain ground, and hopefully will melt away in judicial decisions over the next several years.

      Remember folks, if the executive branch doesn't enforce it, or the judicial branch rules against it, the legislative branch can make as many stupid laws as they want. It's all about checks and balances. Let's hear it for sane appointed judges prevailing over technoignorant elected congressmen.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    67. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't see how HP can "blacklist" him.

      They wouldn't. The publicity would. If he left HP, especially after HP lost a major case as the available deep pockets, then Bruce asked for a job at your medium-sized company, would you take the risk of hiring him?. In any case, an HR director who can't find a defensible reason for not hiring any arbitrarily chosen person really doesn't understand his job. It can be as simple as "not precisely the skill set we're looking for".

    68. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you aren't willing to go to jail you have no convictions.

      OTOH, if you don't get convicted, you don't go to jail.

      Seriously, there are crimes of various degrees of seriousness and there are convictions of varying degrees of importance. I'm convinced homeless people should have reasonable access to free toilet facilities, ability to acquire reasonably priced housing, etc. But If I go to jail for these convictions, I blow my mortgage and become homeless. Not a productive solution, so I do other things.

      By the way, if your convictions are so strong, what are you doing out of jail?

    69. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember folks, if the executive branch doesn't enforce it, or the judicial branch rules against it, the legislative branch can make as many stupid laws as they want. It's all about checks and balances. Let's hear it for sane appointed judges prevailing over technoignorant elected congressmen.

      Sane judges appointed by this administration? Business-favoring laws not being enforced by the executive who hopes to get re-elected? ok, yay.

    70. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd sure like to catch an employer giving me that conversation on tape. That way I'd never HAVE to work for any major computer company again.

      LOL.

      Yeah, they always make sure to lay down a track of all conversations that would harm them.

      Yeah, LOL.

    71. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bruce, before you make any more public speeches, here's a practical bit of advice for you: TAKE SOME PUBLIC SPEAKING LESSONS!

      Oh, and, take some assertiveness training too. When you are speaking you look like a neurotic dog who's owner has beaten up with a newspaper one too many times.

      And here's a praactical bit of advice for you -- learn to separate content from presentation.

      Otherwise you'll end up voting for Bush again.

    72. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In the words of the immortal Rorschach...
      NEVER COMPROMISE [ubalt.edu]

      AHA!!! Once again we meet in slogan-to-slogan combat.

      Well, take this -- "Discretion is the better part of valor". And this -- "Choose your battles." And this -- "I blow my nose in your general direction."

    73. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One of many reasons this country is going (actually , is already there) into the shitter.

      Sorry, I can't tell from the header on your posting which jail you're writing from.

    74. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll ride against the DMCA again, don't worry. The problem today was that it would have hurt HP's Linux program, hardly the desired effect.
      Bruce

      Right choice, Bruce. Choose the time and place that's right for you, not for the twits on the sidelines.

    75. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Question: why do you look like such a fag?

      Why do you look like a fucked-out asshole?

    76. Re:HOWTO: Civil Disobedience by Courageous · · Score: 2

      Someone taking the liberty of issuing a terroristic threat to an employee is PER SE proving themselves to be a narcissistic power monger with a sense of invulnerability. IOW, they are _ALREADY_ acting stupid.

      C//

  4. You want HP to do what? by shlong · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I wish HP had given him their blessing on this, but I guess they have to worry about shareholders first..."

    Written by someone who does not seem to be employed in the corporate world. How can you possibly expect any company to openly endorse a law-breaking event? Sheesh!

    --
    Cat, the other, tastier white meat.
    1. Re:You want HP to do what? by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Probably the same way that the Government endorses law-breaking events... "You shouldn't do that" *wink wink* *nudge nudge*

    2. Re:You want HP to do what? by biohazard99 · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just ask the acountants at AOLTW, Microsoft, Enron, Worldcom, Quest, and Johnson and Johnson. Have you been living under a rock since Thanksgiving?

    3. Re:You want HP to do what? by dubiousmike · · Score: 0

      See:

      -Enron's memos to shred documents.

      -Big Tobacco's memos to market to kids and with hold results that smoking kills you.

    4. Re:You want HP to do what? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Okay, so now HP has pissed off a bunch of geeks (us) who would have liked to see this happen. So, in response, let us not buy HP products. For that matter, we should tell them so.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    5. Re:You want HP to do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that Mr.Perens was ADVERTISING he was going to do an illegal activity. It wasn't hidden from the public's eye like the companies you mentioned (they all were trying to get away with crap, too. Two completely different modivations).

    6. Re:You want HP to do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that HP sells DVD burners (and has a license from the MPAA/DVD Consortium) it's pretty obvious why HP pulled the reins on Bruce.

    7. Re:You want HP to do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Tabacco doesn't market to kids, kids market to kids.

      And they didn't break the law witholding any findings. First of all, there is a bunch of plausible deniability, not enough to avoid the civil lawsuit, but enough to avoid criminal prosecution. Secondly, they aren't explicitly obligated to disclose anything. If they don't, again it opens them up for civil litigation, not criminal.

      Not to mention that they did disclose this a long time ago. The only people, IMHO, that have recourse are the small number of people (relatively) that STARTED smoking in the very few years that intervened between them knowing it MAY cause cancer, and putting it on the pack.

      PVC causes all sorts of cancer that the National Vinyl Association (I think that is their name) has know about since the late 60's. They bought the research that proved this from the French, who knew about it in the mid 50's. Should we hang them also? They still don't post warnings, and that research is a little more condeming.

      Just you daily shot of TRUTH.

    8. Re:You want HP to do what? by feldsteins · · Score: 2

      I find it odd that HP isn't getting a bigger knock in the slashdot forums for this. Everyone seems so rational and understanding and matter-of-fact. Usually one would expect "OMG! The MAN is keeping us down!!" and such. Is it because they sell Linux? What gives?

      --
      You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
    9. Re:You want HP to do what? by dh003i · · Score: 2

      How can you possibly expect any company to openly endorse a law-breaking event?"

      Gee, because its already happened and is happening. Companies that openly endorse breaking the law:

      Microsoft (monopoly, unfair competition)
      Nike (child-labor in 3rd world countries)
      Enron (corporate fraud, embezzlement, cooked books, insider trading)
      Global Crossings (corporate fraud, embezzlement, cooked books, insider trading)
      Martha Stewart's company (corporate fraud, embezzlement, cooked books, insider trading)

      I can go on.

    10. Re:You want HP to do what? by Hrshgn · · Score: 1

      PVC causes all sorts of cancer ....

      But opposed to cigarettes you don't smoke PVC. That's a big difference because basically everything causes all sorts of cancer, it's just a matter of the dose. Dosis facit venenum, or so.

    11. Re:You want HP to do what? by bskin · · Score: 4, Informative

      How can you possibly expect any company to openly endorse a law-breaking event?"

      Gee, because its already happened and is happening. Companies that openly endorse breaking the law:

      Microsoft (monopoly, unfair competition)

      Yes, they spent all the money on their defense because they were openly endorsing that they broke the law.

      Nike (child-labor in 3rd world countries)

      Yes, they love to advertise this fact. (And I'm not sure what they do is against the law, either. It may not be right, but that's not the same thing as illegal.)

      Enron (corporate fraud, embezzlement, cooked books, insider trading)
      Global Crossings (corporate fraud, embezzlement, cooked books, insider trading)

      And that worked out so well for these companies.

      Martha Stewart's company (corporate fraud, embezzlement, cooked books, insider trading)

      You seem to have a good deal of trouble distinguishing between endorsing something openly and doing something illegal. Not to mention confusing individuals within a corporation with the corporation itself.

      The reason there's such a mess in the market right now is because shareholders are not happy with these actions. People broke the law, and the companies and shareholders got fucked. It's quite rare that a public company is going to openly do an illegal action and not only admit to it, but "endorse" it.

      --b.

      --
      hot foreign sheep.
    12. Re:You want HP to do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Written by someone who does not seem to be employed in the corporate world. How can you possibly expect any company to openly endorse a law-breaking event? Sheesh!

      UMMMMMMMMM. Ever hear of HighTimes? Thats just a really fuckin obvious example of "companies endorsing law-breaking events". I could come up with a whole list, but I'll let you think about your comment and repost. Just because something is a LAW doesn't mean its not OBJECTIONAL or JUST PLAIN WRONG.

    13. Re:You want HP to do what? by tacokill · · Score: 1

      Ummm, yea that's exactly who they are looking out for -- shareholders. I guess some of us missed that Business 101 class where we learned that publicly owned companies are OWNED by the shareholders.

      So yea, I hope they are worrying about their shareholders. That's their goddamned job.

    14. Re:You want HP to do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't be a law-breaking event if we the people weren't sleeping and fought the law in congress before it passed.

      We suck for allowing them to pass the DMCA.

    15. Re:You want HP to do what? by guttentag · · Score: 2
      Hold on there slim. Many corporations break the law, but openly endorsing the practice is another matter. Microsoft still claims it hasn't broken any laws (which is the exact opposite of an open endorsement), Enron admits its previous management broke the law and condemns it (again, opposite of open endorsement), Martha Stewart denies she broke the law, etc.

      When corporations break the law, they endorse the practice behind closed doors and only if the practice is profitable. That's very important. HP would not profit by endorsing a violation of the DMCA.

    16. Re:You want HP to do what? by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I guess you're right. We wouldn't want a large corporation to stand up for what's right as opposed to what the U.S. government mandates. If he had intended to give his demonstration in any other country in the world it would have gone unnoticed, but due to corporate interest in the U.S., an overly-broad law was passed that serves no purpose other than to infringe on the rights of consumers (we're not citizens anymore, we're consumers). So, yeah, I would love to see a company like HP stand up for the rights of the people who got them to where they are today. Unfortunately it'll never happen. Oh, and by the way, I am employed in the corporate world, and you missed my point anyways. They could have just as easily stood idly by and watched. I'm quite sure that if I did something illegal on my own time, my corporate masters wouldn't get dragged into court for it. What he does on his own time has nothing to do with his job. All that would be required of HP in court is to say he had the day off.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    17. Re:You want HP to do what? by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 1
      I'm quite sure that if I did something illegal on my own time, my corporate masters wouldn't get dragged into court for it.

      Even the threat of it could be unacceptable if your pockets are deep enough, and the US legal system is screwed up enough that I can't even say you wouldn't lose.

    18. Re:You want HP to do what? by capologist · · Score: 1
      Written by someone who does not seem to be employed in the corporate world. How can you possibly expect any company to openly endorse a law-breaking event? Sheesh!

      Was anybody asking for HP's open endorsement? Perens was going to be doing this as an individual on his own time, not as a representative of HP. Couldn't the company simply have abstained from involvement?

    19. Re:You want HP to do what? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2
      Martha Stewart's company (corporate fraud, embezzlement, cooked books, ...)

      And don't forget those godawful cook books!

    20. Re:You want HP to do what? by ecstatic · · Score: 1

      Well considering their products suck, it's not much of a change from my previous purchasing practices.

    21. Re:You want HP to do what? by shlong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Was anybody asking for HP's open endorsement? Perens was going to be doing this as an individual on his own time, not as a representative of HP. Couldn't the company simply have abstained from involvement?

      Good point. However, you tend to loose your anonymity when you are high-profile. Whether Bruce Perens was going to do this on his own time and own dime isn't really relevant, because people will still say, "That's Bruce Perens of Linux and HP fame." I can imagine some high-level exec, maybe even Ms. Fiorina, getting a call about it the next morning from someone saying, "Do you know what your employee did yesterday?" Innevitably, HP would take heat for it. It's the consequence of being high-profile. I'm sure that Linux Torvalds, Alan Cox, etc, all share that burden too.

      And yes, the original submitter was asking for HP's endorsement.

      --
      Cat, the other, tastier white meat.
    22. Re:You want HP to do what? by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      Of course. Corporations are by nature immoral. You can not expect them to take any action which is moral unless it leads directly to profit. Of course there are so few moral actions that lead to profit but that's another story.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    23. Re:You want HP to do what? by jagripino · · Score: 1


      Same feelings here. Having worked for HP in the past, when I read the original story I couldn't help thinking "who's this guy manager? MY manager would never allow me to do that..."

    24. Re:You want HP to do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      may not be right, but that's not the same thing as illegal

      And there you hit the nail on the head.

      Right is not necessarilly Legal, and Legal is not necessarilly Right.

      This Law is WRONG, but perfectly Legal.

      Do what's Right.

    25. Re:You want HP to do what? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      If HP were to endorse it, they could conceivably be convicted of aiding and abetting, or something like that. I'm not sure how far the vagueness of the DMCA could be stretched by an imaginative lawyer. :(

      Bruce is a smart boy; he'll find some other way to make his point, and I'm sure next time he'll find some means that won't put anyone else at unwilling risk.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    26. Re:You want HP to do what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      corporations aren't fundamentally immoral - they are amoral. First of all corporations are nothing more than a "legal fiction", a legal means of representing individuals and giving them certain legal obligations and legal protections. Secondly, they do exist to make a profit (assuming they aren't a non-profit corp). To say they are immoral would say they try to do what is not moral, but that is silly (unless you are trying to say making a profit is immoral). Besides, if they were fundamenally immoral, whose morals is it that they try to violate? People have different views on what's moral.

    27. Re:You want HP to do what? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      Well, if they are in for a knocking, it really should come from me. But I don't think their point was incorrect - they felt that I'd be pulling HP and their Linux program in with me. I'll live to fight another day.

      Bruce

    28. Re:You want HP to do what? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      You're correct.

      Bruce

    29. Re:You want HP to do what? by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      There is no real difference between amoral and immoral when it comes to beings. Yes objects can be amoral but any action taken by any being is either moral or immoral.

      Corporations are beings (you say legal fiction but the supreme court which is a legal entity says that they are beings). More precisely they are immortal soul-less beings and in this regard they are much like the demons and devils which are described in religious texts.

      As an aside making profit is actually immoral if your morality comes from christ or budha. Both of those figures preached a life of charity and poverty. They both repeatedly warned against accumulating wealth, borrowing, lending, and usury. Since corporations are built only to pursue wealth they are inherently immoral. Also since corporations are designed to shirk personal responsibility they are immoral.

      "Besides, if they were fundamenally immoral, whose morals is it that they try to violate? People have different views on what's moral."

      Very true. If you were a satanist for example pursuing wealth and accumulating it are very moral activities. If you are christian or a budhist then they are not moral activities. If you are a moslem then you have no problems with accumulating wealth. It all depends on where you are coming from.

      Capitalism most closely resembles satanism something I find facinating.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    30. Re:You want HP to do what? by Fogbank · · Score: 1

      >> Nike (child-labor in 3rd world countries)
      > Yes, they love to advertise this fact.

      Yes, they do

      --
      Ciao,
      Foggy
  5. probably a good thing by jglow · · Score: 1

    It's probably not a bad idea that he didn't go through with this.. we could see the whole Dmitry Sklyarov situation over again.. only possibly worse. Something tells me that this would be a little more serious than hacking eBooks.

    --


    There's no "I" in Linux.. err..
    1. Re:probably a good thing by ultima · · Score: 2, Troll

      Unfortunately, as we see time and time again, Americans are willing to trade their freedom for a bit of money. If Perens was serious about risking jailtime, why isn't he willing to resign from his position at HP before giving the presentation?

      A true patriot might die for his country; I'm sure there are more than enough companies and hackers willing to donate a bit of cash if needs be until he finds another job.

    2. Re:probably a good thing by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      You first.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:probably a good thing by ryanvm · · Score: 2

      Oh bullshit. What have you done?

    4. Re:probably a good thing by mark-t · · Score: 2

      The answer to this is so obvious that I'm suprised you would even ask this question. As has been posted elsewhere in this topic, Bruce was quite willing to put his own neck on the line, but HP had raised the concern that his affiliation with them could cause HP to be the target of a lawsuit rather than Perens himself. The realistic possibility of this event is what has caused him to back down -- not because he doesn't want to get fired, but because he doesn't want HP getting in trouble for something he was choosing to do. It wouldn't matter whether or not Perens was doing this independantly of HP or not, HP would still be a target, and unless HP decided to fire him before he gave the presentation, they would not be able to prove that they were not somehow behind Bruce's efforts.

  6. Maybe he won't, but... by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 1

    Maybe he won't do it, but it's only a matter of time before his notes get "misplaced" or someone else simply steps forward.

    --
    -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
  7. In other news... by warmcat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr Perens now able to walk without wheelbarrow; confirms HP has his nuts in a very large jar.

    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is clear that you are not terribly intelligent.

  8. Mass disobedience by crosbie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What would be far more effective and less risky would be for Bruce to figure out a nice cute way to get each member of the audience to violate the DMCA.

    1. Re:Mass disobedience by crosbie · · Score: 1

      For example, something like this:

      Write down on a piece of paper the following characters:

      'A','D','A','M','space','H','A','D','space','apo st rophe','E','M'

      Then he can say "Ok, you lot, you've just infringed copyright on the shortest poem: Fleas"

      Or perhaps he could dish out tons of sealed envelopes that contain instructions that would violate the DMCA. He can say that no-one must open the envelopes, on pain of violating the DMCA. Then a bit of a nudge and a wink and the audience may take it upon themselves to open the envelopes...

      Well, you get the idea.

    2. Re:Mass disobedience by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 2

      In what way would that be circumventing copy protection?

      --
      You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
    3. Re:Mass disobedience by echo · · Score: 2

      Because, in order to copy the poem one would have to "circumvent" the copy protection... in this case, the copy protection is the envelope... you have to take it out of the envelope in order to copy it.

    4. Re:Mass disobedience by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:
      Because, in order to copy the poem one would have to "circumvent" the copy protection... in this case, the copy protection is the envelope... you have to take it out of the envelope in order to copy it.
      So, is an envelope a "technical access-control device"? What if I rot13 something, twice?
    5. Re:Mass disobedience by certron · · Score: 1

      >Because, in order to copy the poem one would have to "circumvent" the copy protection... in this case, the copy protection is the envelope... you have to take it out of the envelope in order to copy it.

      I much prefer the term "Access Control" to copy protection, since that is truly what it is. The technological measures limit your access to your own property (the fair use rights are still there, you just have no way to exercise them).

      And now for a little story:
      This reminds me a little bit of a story about a famous trickster (Nasreddin Hodja, but I'm not sure which part of the Middle East he comes from) who sold his house to someone for a very good price, except for a nail in the kitchen. When the new owner was eating dinner, Hodja insisted that he be allowed to come in and check on his nail, to make sure that nothing had happened to it. Eventually, he got to annoying that the new owner agreed to buy the nail from him, for a considerable sum, just so he didn't have to deal with being interrupted all the time.

      OK, so it isn't a *totally* relevant story, but if the MPAA can 'enter' your devices and 'check on' 'their' property, well, do you really own it, even though you paid money for it? Perhaps I don't 'know' how to properly use the 'single' quotes... :-)

      And, since it is kinda relevant, I offer my letter that I wrote: http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-09 -11-011-20-OP-HW-SW-0000 and a short follow-up: http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-09 -11-011-20-OP-HW-SW-0021

      --

      fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
      eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
    6. Re:Mass disobedience by ces · · Score: 1

      hmm ... pass out CDs with Sony's copy control system and Sharpies' to each member of the audience. Explain how to circumvent the copy control on the CD. Ask members of audience to proceed ...

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    7. Re:Mass disobedience by VValdo · · Score: 2

      hmm ... pass out CDs with Sony's copy control system and Sharpies' to each member of the audience. Explain how to circumvent the copy control on the CD. Ask members of audience to proceed ...

      Nope. Just telling them how to do it is a violation of the DMCA.

      W

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    8. Re:Mass disobedience by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      We actually only had 45 minutes for the talk, and after Martin's preamble to my speech, it was more like 30. So, I did the talk, quickly, without additional attempts to demonstrate. There will be other opportunities for that. My demonstration was intended to show how the common person could be a DMCA-violator, not how a room-full of geeks and nerds could do it deliberately. We'll figure out another way to make that point.

      Bruce

    9. Re:Mass disobedience by thulldud · · Score: 1

      Cute story. Nasreddin Hoja is a Turkish folk hero. Lots of stories about him. Good for you they're all out of copyright.

    10. Re:Mass disobedience by Ratface · · Score: 2

      Bruce - will there be a transcript of your talk posted anywhere? It would be interesting to hear your views on how we all can contribute to a campaign of civil disobedience against the DMCA.

      I rememberthe huge civil disobedience campaign against the Poll Tax in the UK, where pretty much 50% of the country refused to pay the tax. That had the effect of prdding the government to change to a fair(er) system. Civil disobedience *can* be an extremely useful method of protest. More power to you.

      --

      A little planning goes a long way...
  9. Re:WHAT A PUSSY!!! by paladin_tom · · Score: 0

    If you're not willing to make a public demonstration of violating the DCMA yourself, you have NO RIGHT to call the guy names.

    --
    #define sig "Every social system runs on the people's belief in it."
  10. Maybe by PaddyM · · Score: 1

    we should send letters of support to HP and tell them to help rid the US of the DMCA.

  11. Wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where does this guy get off having a job?

    A *real* os advocate lives in his parent's basement and eats ramen noodles!

  12. Forget that comments about civil disobedience. I can't believe that someone we credited with having such huge balls could back out of this. I guess no one in this world has enough of a spine to stand up for themselves. I am disgusted.
    And HP's probably just crabby because they broke up with Dell.
    What ever happened to the open-source and Linux spirit of invention and innovation, improving things, against all odds? Have we all forgotten how important this is? I really hope not.

    1. Re:Sad by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you are truely so offended, then I humbly suggest that you volunteer to perform the DMCA violating presentation as an introduction to Mr Perens' presentation.

      In other words: take up the banner or shut the hell up. The last thing we need is more armchair revolutionary grumbling.

      Alternatively, you could take a little time to educate yourself about the actual reason HP asked him not to do the demonstration, and perhaps even explore the actual reason he agreed. I suspect an old adage regarding picking ones battles applies here.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    2. Re:Sad by imta11 · · Score: 1

      exploit men exploit?

    3. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If he didn't have the balls to go through with it, he shouldn't have made the claim in the first place.

      *He* backed out due to *pressure*. Well, hell, I think it's damn fair to apply pressure in calling it what it is, a kotow to the corporate interests and a sell out by a supposed leader.

      Anything he says from now on is suspect in many people's minds. Maybe not yours, but certainly in mind.

    4. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed! (Anonymous Coward pun intended). Why don't you volunteer to go to jail, lose your job and bear the weight of having to feed your family and pay your bills while you're in there. Such opposition is not always in other's best interest -- You don't know how HP "Persuaded" him to back down, maybe they threatened his job?

    5. Re:Sad by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      You don't know how HP "Persuaded" him to back down, maybe they threatened his job?

      Actually I do, because I read the article.

      He is giving the presentation as an agent of HP. If he breaks the law as an agent of HP, HP is liable for damages. It's pretty clear that Perens has no problem getting himself in trouble, but when it was clear that his actions would get someone else in trouble also, he chose to back down rather than expose that essentially innocent third party to liability.

      This is the right and honorable thing to do, and only increases my respect for the man.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    6. Re:Sad by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      RTFA

      He didn't back out because he didn't have the balls, he backed out because performing the demonstration would expose HP, not just himself, to criminal liability. Endangering others, especially those who support you in doing good works, for the sake of a public stunt is decidedly not cool, whether those "others" are helpless children or giant corporations.

      If the fact that he deals with his employer honorably makes him a sellout and suspect in your mind, then you are an idiot. Any true leader must be able to consider the consequences his actions will have for his allies, and act responsibly if that ally isn't prepared to accept that risk. Perens has demonstrated that ability, and it only increases my respect for him.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    7. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. I did not RTFA.

  13. IANAL but... by Zaphod+B · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems to me that I recall from the few law courses I took that when an employee breaks a law during the faithful performance of his duties, his employer is equally culpable and thus open to criminal liability.

    Now, whether he was going to be doing this in the faithful performance of his duties is a matter of some debate, but I can fully understand HP's nervousness in this matter.

    A better (and more efficient if less symbolic) thing to do would be for Perens to convince HP to use their [considerable] legislative influence to get the DMCA modified. Companies lobbying against laws with which they disagree is a hallmark of the American corporate world.

    --
    Zaphod B
    When duplication is outlawed, only outlaws will have /bin/cp
    1. Re:IANAL but... by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      Considering that the whole focus of his presentation is to be the horrors of the DMCA, I'd doubt that he's doing this as a work-related duty. I'd think HP would be just as upset about him bad mouthing the law as they would be about him breaking it, if he were doing this as a representative of theirs. And if he's not doing it as official HP business, then whatever he does, he does on his own time. If my employers ever start telling me what I can and cannot do on my own time, it's time to find a new job.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    2. Re:IANAL but... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Corporations cannot commit criminal activities, only individuals. The only exceptions to this are rico cases. Corporations are only ever liable to civil action. HP could be concerned that the MPAA would sue them, not criminal procedings.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:IANAL but... by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but he is HP's "open source" evangelist at an "open source" related convention. The point could probably be made (keep in mind a clueless jury here) that being involved in a conference mostly involving his professional peers that he was representing HP.

      Not saying it's right, but with our legal system, I would be cautious too.

    4. Re:IANAL but... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      You are correct.

      Bruce

    5. Re:IANAL but... by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      Thanks for speaking up Bruce. It's unfortunate things had to go this way. I totally understand HP's stand on this, and I don't blame them one bit, but I still think it sucks. It's a shame things in the U.S. have gone so far that corporate interests can entirely squash free speech and academic presentations.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  14. DMCA inhibits free speech again by alienmole · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is an excellent example of how the DMCA can have a chilling effect on free speech without even having to be tested in court. People often focus on the law itself as the threat, but as much of a threat can be how companies and individuals behave in response to the law - self-policing can sometimes be the worst kind.

    1. Re:DMCA inhibits free speech again by t0rnt0pieces · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you can't breathe funny without worrying about getting into a lawsuit. There's this comic book store in the mall near me that used to have a drawing of Yoda or something hanging up in their store. Well George Lucas somehow found out about it and his lawyers sent them a letter stating that they had to take it down! There has to be a line drawn about where the first amendment ends and copyright law begins. Under the current laws, it's anything but clear.

      --
      Karma: Excellent (In Soviet Russia, karma pimps YOU)
    2. Re:DMCA inhibits free speech again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I am really starting to loathe this website. This isn't meant to be a troll or start shit, just a rant.

      You people are so unbelievable. The majority of you have never known a day of hardship, want, hunger..never wondered if the cold was going to kill you at 3 in the morning because you didn't have a roof overhead, etc. And yet you whine like little bitches about the DCMA and the MPAA like you're so fucking oppressed. My god! Who gives a flying fuck. The majority of your bitching, ESPECIALLY when it comes to the RIAA, has nothing to do with free speech or human rights, it has to do with you being pissed that someone out their is making you pay for something. I for one am getting a bit older, and if I want software or a cd, I go and buy it. Enough is enough, fuck.

    3. Re:DMCA inhibits free speech again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So get the f*ck out of here!!! Why do you even bother!!! I buy my software too I just hate getting screwed and having no options....

    4. Re:DMCA inhibits free speech again by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1

      An AC wrote:

      > The majority of you have never known a day of
      > hardship, want, hunger..never wondered if the cold
      > was going to kill you at 3 in the morning because
      > you didn't have a roof overhead, etc.

      Perhaps not. But that doesn't mean that one cannot be compassionate, uphold ideals, or stand up to tyrants.

      Then again, I don't see the fat, greedy sharks you are so eager to defend, being all that needy either.

      > And yet you whine like little bitches about the
      > DCMA and the MPAA like you're so fucking
      > oppressed.

      Do you own a Sharpie felt tip pen? Under the DMCA, it is an illegal copyright circumvention device. Welcome to your jail cell, and enjoy that oppressed feeling.

      The DMCA is a ridiculous law that turns innocent citizens into criminals. It is the act of copyright violation (say selling a thousand pirated copies of a CD) that should be punished, not the owning of felt tip pens, or the producing of software so the blind can read eBooks.

      > The majority of your bitching, ESPECIALLY when
      > it comes to the RIAA, has nothing to do with
      > free speech or human rights, it has to do with
      > you being pissed that someone out their is
      > making you pay for something.

      Some Slashdotters may be that way. As for me, I paid $60 for a legal copy of a 2 disk Japanese soundtrack (and boy have I gotten my money's worth!). What I hate about the RIAA is that my money for a CD would go to greedy sharks, not to the hardworking artists, who those sharks want to make wage slaves out of (and if they could, would not pay at all). It is the artists who should hold the copyrights, and the artists who should get the lion's share of the profits.

      "They bind our hearts: 'Let's sell them again and again!'
      Our plan understands the sea; we can wait for her coming."
      From the song "Infant Girl" in the Japanese version of Mothra (1961).

    5. Re:DMCA inhibits free speech again by alienmole · · Score: 2
      It doesn't sounds as though you understand the issues that the DMCA raises. You're not alone, and this is one of the reasons that the DMCA has remained unchallenged for as long as it has.

      I'm plenty old enough to pay for CDs, and I do. I've occassionally previewed downloaded music, but I haven't stolen a penny from the RIAA, by any definition. But this is so far from being the issue with the DMCA that it's not even funny. I don't have time to write up an essay about it right now, but I'll try to encapsulate it briefly.

      The DMCA represnts an unprecedented extension of copyright and intellectual property (IP) powers in favor of the IP owners. IP owners now have the right to control your use of their creations in ways that they previously, under established fair use laws, did not have a right to do. In addition, if you choose to circumvent the law - as people do all the time, such as when speeding or parking illegally - you are then subject to extremely punitive fines and jail sentences.

      Your point about hardship is irrelevant. For the record, I fled the country of my birth, under threat of arrest for a non-violent political offense. I've experienced life under a non-democratic government. Yes, the situation may be worse for other people and in other places, and the DMCA is not as serious as, say, the rule of the Taliban was. Does that mean we should simply give up more of our freedoms to corporations who want more money and greater control over our wallets and our actions? Obviously not. It's an irrelevant point.

      Another subject that's poorly understood in these discussions is what intellectual property really means. There's longstanding legal precedent which acknowledges that creators of IP benefit from access to the public domain in creating their works, which is why laws only allow an IP owner limited control over their works for a limited period of time. IP owners like Disney, however, have succeeded in gutting this principle in the law, and the DMCA extends this gutting much further, eliminating many forms of what was previously considered legal fair use.

      There's a common myth that intellectual "property" should be legally treated like any other property, but just a little thought and applied intelligence indicates that this is clearly not the case.

      In my opinion, much of what's in the DMCA will not survive when it finally reaches the point of being properly tested up to the Supreme Court level, because it violates basic premises of what is in the public interest. Unfortunately, the DMCA itself provides enormous disincentives to challenging it - in the form of extreme fines and sentences for even minor acts - which was the point of my original post.

    6. Re:DMCA inhibits free speech again by unicron · · Score: 2

      >>Perhaps not. But that doesn't mean that one cannot be compassionate, uphold ideals, or stand up to tyrants.

      You obviously don't know what a Tyrant is.

      >>Then again, I don't see the fat, greedy sharks you are so eager to defend, being all that needy either

      Just because I attack one side of something does not mean I favor the opposing side.

      >>Do you own a Sharpie felt tip pen? Under the DMCA, it is an illegal copyright circumvention device. Welcome to your jail cell, and enjoy that oppressed feeling.

      Yeah, the cells are overfilling with people in there for that.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    7. Re:DMCA inhibits free speech again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What else would you expect from a cocksucker named "Bruce"?

  15. This post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Violates the DCMA

  16. Shareholders? by Uttles · · Score: 2

    Like it's really going to make a difference? Hell if he broke the DMCA I'd buy stock just in spite of stupid laws.

    --

    ~ now you know
  17. Congress shall make no Law by Rupert · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    They don't have to. Corporations like HPQ will do a fine job of abridging freedom of speech without any help from the government.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  18. One of us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will have to take it from here. Next meetup, invite your friend the policeman, and have a DMCA violating party. Well, actually, the lagal fees could get out of hand.

  19. Any link's to hacking your DVD player? by nexusone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Also anyone have a hack for the ATI DVD player?

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
  20. Solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Quit, rebel. Who needs money when you can damn the man with open source.

  21. Damn this sucks by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 1

    Couldn't he just rape or murder someone on stage instead, I mean what does HP can possibly say about that?

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
  22. "I hate the DMCA" by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 1

    What about the DeCSS song so popular a couple of years ago? Why doesn't he just hire a big band and a few backup singers and explain the technique as a broadway musical production?

  23. Jail/HP same thing? by g(zerofunk.org) · · Score: 1

    This guy is worried about going to a 'pound me in the a$$' prison for a DMCA issue when he works at HP? is that one of those oxyID10T things? heh.
    g

  24. Too bad by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's too bad. I was hoping that his demonstration would show the DVD industry how lame their little region scheme is, and how easy(?) it is to circumvent. If they want to continue using the region system they should consider making some DVDs region free, like the DVDs mentioned in the original article (Gladiator was one of them I believe) and other popular ones.

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  25. LNUX UP ONE CENT TO SIXTY-FOUR CENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. Re:WHAT A PUSSY!!! by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1

    Nothing against Mr. Perens, but if he is not going to go thru with it, he should not have made such a big fuss over it.

  27. Way to go Bruce! by electricmonk · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that wasn't just a desperate cry for attention, now was it?

    --
    Friends don't let friends use multiple inheritance.
    1. Re:Way to go Bruce! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do it then, fuckwit. At least he was willing to try.

    2. Re:Way to go Bruce! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to say I'll try and then back out, same thing right?

  28. Just breaking the law is pretty pointless by jguthrie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Frankly, I can't see the point of just breaking the law in public. In my opinion, a better course of action would be to set up the conditions for a test case that could be won in the courts. That will likely require some public lawbreaking, but will also require there be something about the lawbreaking that demonstrates how the law in question isn't reasonable. Simply showing how easy it is to violate said law isn't going to do that.

    1. Re:Just breaking the law is pretty pointless by gorilla · · Score: 2

      In order for there to be a test case, the law has to be broken.

    2. Re:Just breaking the law is pretty pointless by Sway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only does it seem like a poor demonstration, but I find it a little disturbing so many people seem to think it's a good idea. Let's step back and not use Bruce's name or refence the DMCA law he was planning to violate. Let's just say so-and-so was planning to break the law in public. Is that really a good thing? Is that really something you want to cheer for? It certainly seems like misdirected frustration.

      *shrug* maybe it's just me :)

      --

      Peace. Sway

    3. Re:Just breaking the law is pretty pointless by markmoss · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the american legal system, the courts really, really dislike to rule on theoretical cases. It would be very unlikely that any federal court would take a case initiated by Perens of "if I do such and so, is it illegal or constitutionally protected." There are three good reasons for this:
      1) Real cases often hinge on the particular facts more than Constitutional interpretation.
      2) Taking a non-case makes more work for the judges.
      3) There is some history of the Supreme Court stepping beyond the actual facts of a case and trying to express how the principles would apply in other cases. Many of these rulings are now considered aberrant and deplorable (Dredd Scott, e.g.).

      And a federal court has already refused to consider one not entirely theoretical case: Dr. Felten, who cancelled a presentation because of a threatening letter from one of the **AA's. By the time he got this into court, the conference was already over, and the **AA was saying they would never have a legitimate researcher prosecuted for presenting his research results - they'd already got what they wanted, but because there was no _current_ case, the court wouldn't look at it.

      So, to actually get the DMCA in court, you've got to have a case of someone being prosecuted for an actual violation. If Perens demo & lecture would be a violation, and if the authorities weren't smart enough to ignore it, then this would be the right test case; Perens was merely presenting the results of research into a technical security measure to a conference of researchers. It's a perfect 1st amendment case.

      Furthermore, the circumvention Perens proposed is NOT of copy protection, but simply of a dubious technical scheme to restrict the trade of DVD's across borders, which is routinely and legally circumvented in many other nations. Free-trade conservatives ought to dislike region-coding (or at least government action to ban circumventing it) as a restriction on free trade. Liberal judges ought to hate it as another way for big business to screw the consumer.

  29. on of the best things by Satai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of the best things about Bruce Perens is that he's so active in the actual community as well as the upper-echelons of aforementioned community - he's so active here, on the Slashdot forums, lending a great dialogue to any article about him.

  30. Putting one's money where one's mouth is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if HP doesn't like what Bruce was going to do, and Bruce *really* believes in it, then the answer is simple: Bruce should quit HP and do it anyways.

    I find it kind of ridiculous to portray oneself as the white knight in shining armour that will do an act of civil disobedience only to pull back when it becomes obvious that this act of civil disobedience would, in fact, have consequences.

    By looking at this from a jaded perspective it seems that the great 'civil disobedience' Bruce was planning, was planned because he thought there wouldn't have been any consequences. When HP made it clear that they were displeased, Bruce backpedaled.

    If Bruce, as the article said, was willing to take the legal risks on himself, he should have simply resigned from his HP position before making his stand instead of looking like somebody who is along for the ride only while there are no risks.

  31. You should be applauding HP by t0qer · · Score: 1, Troll

    I wish HP had given him their blessing on this, but I guess they have to worry about shareholders first

    Why would you wish anyone to break a law and possibly go to jail? I think if anything, HP should be applauded.

    Of course we all know the reason HP didn't back him up to cover their own ass. HP as a company is known for it's damn near scientologist corporate culture, it's lack of workplace safety in both domestic and foriegn sweatshops, and since carly's reign of terror, some of the worst corporate decisions to keep the executives paid. Fuck everyone else and the shareholders, that's the new HP.

    You know what folks? Fark HP those fargin bastages.

    yes I was laid off once by HP, only once you fargin bastages!

    --toq

    1. Re:You should be applauding HP by jasenj1 · · Score: 1


      but I guess they have to worry about shareholders first...

      Obviously written by someone who doesn't own shares of HP. If HP management, i.e. Carly and the BoD, cared about shareholder value they wouldn't have bought that boat anchor Compaq.

    2. Re:You should be applauding HP by t0qer · · Score: 1

      that's what i was sayin, well in a cynical way I guess. They Dont give a shit.

      No I don't own any shares of anything, I dumped all my money into a house! Best thing I ever could have done with it.

  32. Message to Bruce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Fuck HP. Do it, and change your job. Or retire. Do you have enough money already?

    What do you think ever will be accomplished if people are afraid to act?

  33. I guess what's needed... by alispguru · · Score: 2

    ... is the backing of a company big enough to handle the potential legal expense, and not afraid of (or already aligned with) the media giants. They should be on at least speaking terms with the open source community, too.

    Apple springs to mind. Anybody else?

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  34. It was a dumb idea anyway by sh00z · · Score: 1
    His plan was to exercise fair use rights that were explicitly listed as incompatible on the packaging of both the player and the media. You buy DVD players and discs knowing that region codes are a limitation. It's right there on the box, not even hidden in some EULA. It's like complaining that a CD won't play in your cassette deck. Duh! They're not compatible BY DESIGN. HP probably realized how poorly his claims would hold up in court, compared the depths of their own pockets with his, and decided that the liability was too great.

    Now, if he wanted a legitimate fair-use claim, he would pull a film professor up there on stage, and have THAT individual use DECSS or an equivalent tool to perform a screen capture of a single frame for the purpose of criticism or education.

    1. Re:It was a dumb idea anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your example isn't correct. Nobody expects a company to make two formats interoperable under fair use, but they *do* assume *they themselves* can, for instance, copy their CD to tape, so that their CD-playerless car can play it. The DMCA effectively cuts off this kind of end-user modification *after* the content is purchased. It has nothing to do with the format, just being allowed to do what you want with what you payed for.

    2. Re:It was a dumb idea anyway by sh00z · · Score: 1

      But that's not what he was planning to demonstrate. He said he was going to play a European DVD in a North American player, and it tells you right on the box that it simply won't work. For all legal and practical purposes, DVD-EU and DVD-NA *are* two different formats. It doesn't matter that you can use a chip to *make* it work, it's simply not covered by fair use (IANAL, but this seems pretty clear-cut).

    3. Re:It was a dumb idea anyway by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      I think that he wanted to assert that a law that prevented a user from modifying their own legally purchased hardware so that it would operate outside of its normal specifications is itself absurd. Kind of like a law that would legally prevent you from adding sufficient parts to a cassette deck to make it play CDs. Not sure how well that would go over in court, though.

    4. Re:It was a dumb idea anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't see how anyone can say "explicitly listed as incompatible".

      I've purchased a handful of DVDs here in Canada, and _nowhere_ on the box does it say anything to the effect of "region coded - will only play in North American DVD players".

      The "incompatible by design" argument will also fall apart because to the average consumer, there's no way to tell that region coded DVDs are different and incompatible, whereas the difference between a CD and a cassette is pretty obvious.

    5. Re:It was a dumb idea anyway by martyn+s · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Besides the fact that it's perfectly legal to modify your cassette player, if you could figure out how, to play CDs. That's the real crux of the issue.

    6. Re:It was a dumb idea anyway by gerardrj · · Score: 2

      No they are not two different formats. The content is in the same format. The only difference is a few bytes in the disk identifier that mark the region.
      Saying Region 1 and Region two are different formats is about as effective as saying two idetical doors are of different styles because one as an "enter" sign and the other has an "exit" sign.
      Both (regions and signs) are artificially imposed limitations on the use of the device.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  35. will the real bruce perens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    err, sorry wrong discussion.

  36. shareholder interest by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
    "I guess they have to worry about shareholders first..."

    how do you explain the merger with compaq?

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  37. I hate to say it, but sounds like a media stunt. by Linuxb0y · · Score: 0

    I don't believe Bruce Perens had any intentions of violating the DMCA in the first place.
    Sounds he just wanted to attract media attention to the issue.
    Why didn't he get his employers (HP) permission in the first place?
    This sounds like he planned this stunt from the get go.
    GG Perens, you've made OSS a bigger mockery than it already is.
    1 - 0 Corps!

  38. What we need is... by Jacer · · Score: 1

    enough people breaking unjust laws until they're repealed like prohibition. Hardware modifications need to become mainstream, especially the ones that are slightly more subversive, but still have legitimate use. The difficult part is the nerd/geek demograph is small, and rarely addressed by any political figure.

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    1. Re:What we need is... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      repealed like prohibition

      Prohibition wasn't repealed, in fact it keeps expanding to more and more substances every year.

      Oh, I guess you meant Alcohol prohibition.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:What we need is... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      I can agree in principle. It would be a Truly Great Thing, I think, if a lot more people learned at least the basics of working with electronics. However, I doubt we'll see hardware mods going "mainstream" any time soon.

      Consider that almost any hardware mod done to a DVD player, or just about any other complex electronic device, requires; High-quality soldering equipment (and I'm NOT talking about the cheapie $15 irons at Radio Schaak -- You need a decent Weller or Edsyn soldering station, with a grounded tip and tight temperature control, if you don't want to fry the device you're working on); Knowledge of how to interpret photos of the device being modded; Knowledge of what the various components look like; Knowledge of how to read/interpret electronic schematics (in some cases); Appropriate hand tools (wire cutters, strippers, etc.); Wire-wrap or similar #30 wire; And the manual skill to effectively use all the above.

      Given the typical level of DETAILED electronics knowledge and interest present in the consumer arena, and not even getting started on the (approximate) $200-$300 investment in the proper tools, I think you'd have a better chance convincing Joe/Jane Consumer that Osama Bin Laden is a great humanitarian before you'd see hardware mods going truly mainstream.

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

  39. Maybe I'm reading it werid but... by aronc · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It came across to me more like this:

    Perens: "The DMCA is bad law. I'm going to show why by breaking it. Let them come after me."
    HP: "Umm... they could sue the shit out of us if you do that. Probably will. We have money, and you know how much they love money."
    Perens: "Shit. I don't want HP to take the fall for my demonstration. Lets think about this some more."

    Nieve? Maybe. But with HP saying they are the "bigger fish" that seems to be the case to me.

    --

    jello.
    aka aron.
  40. Shareholders by nuggz · · Score: 2

    Good, finally a company doing what is right for the people that OWN the company.
    I guess Enron, Worldcom and a few others should have done that too.

  41. Maybe we should have faith in Mr. Perens' balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The theory seems to be that HP pressured Perens to withdraw his plans for fear of liability... if their employee breaks the DMCA, and they knew he was going to do it, and they did nothing to stop it, etc...

    But if they tell their employee not to break the law, and he publicly agrees, then goes ahead and does it anyway, that's a different story, isn't it? HP would be able to say that they did what they could, but this crazy Perens guy just couldn't be stopped.

    It's not as if he's a director of the company... there has to be a point at which their liability for his behaviour ends.

    My theory is that there is a very careful game of due-diligence charades going on here, and that we will see some DMCA-busting after all.

    1. Re:Maybe we should have faith in Mr. Perens' balls by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      I will live to fight again, as you say, but will make sure that HP and HP's Linux program (even more important) are not hurt by future activities, as they might have been by this one.

      Bruce

  42. I don't get it? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    He wasn't worried about going to jail but was worried about his job? Could he work from jail? Something is up with this. HP is beginning to smell funny.

    1. Re:I don't get it? by acceleriter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they're called Compaquard Bell now.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    2. Re:I don't get it? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Ha Ha Funny, I would MOD you up but alas, it is not in my power.

  43. Nieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a naive individual would say that.

  44. HP has nothing to worry about. by tato+(and+tato+only) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The last thing that the entertainment cartel wants to do is to force a large, respectable corporation with deep pockets into a position of having to defend itself against a DCMA violation. A well-funded legal effort by a respectable defendant could possibly result in the DCMA being found unconstitutional. The entertainment cartel will continue to hand-pick its legal challenges to be sure they do not take on any they might lose.

    --
    tato (and tato only)
    This post is strictly opinion, including the spelling.
  45. This is how the nazies came to power in Germany by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

    Nobody had the balls to stand up to the bastards.

    Well, HP's customer support is nonexistent and their products are quirky as hell, so nothing lost on that front.

    --
    Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  46. Re:WHAT A PUSSY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A prudent move would have been to clear this with his boss (HP) prior to the announcement.
    BTW where is the T.C. server?

    AREDUBYAESS

  47. UNBREAKABLE! by bzzt · · Score: 1

    Perens, that's lame - some phoney baloney excuse about corporate sponsorship when you know full well it was never possible in the first place.

    as if we didn't know. DVD REGION PROTECTION IS UNBREAKABLE! mark yourselves -1 TrollBait if you thought he was actually going to go through with this. everyone knows that dvd region coding is right up there with the speed of light.

    ah, Perens, subtle! you've clearly illustrated the absurdity of a law against the impossible. you would have publicly demonstrated the impossible, but it's against the law.

    i guess we'll never know what crazy scheme you dreamed up for circumventing dvd region coding, or FTL travel for that matter. and you'll never tell, since even discussing it is against the law!

  48. This is the problem is Open Source by MrBrklyn · · Score: 1
    This is the essential problem with the Open Source ideology and all too many of the developers who view themselves as Open Source advocates. The issue of the DMCA pales in comparision of anything HP can be funding for OSI, and yet, Bruce Perens is refusing to demonstrate effectively against the DMCA because of the economic interests of HP.

    When NYLXS had it's Business Demonstration at the Graduate Center of CUNY in Manhattan, one young man challenged us when he asked if we should be doing more with IBM on the front of Free Software advocacy. We replied to him that IBM can not be trusted to protect the interests of Free Software, and digital property rights, because IBM is mandated by it's charter as a corperation to protect the interests of it's share holders.

    So while it is true that businesses need freedom to compete in a fair and open market, businesses can not be depended upon to protect that freedom, nor should we expect them to. This is not their function.

    Only through Free Software and political action to protect individual property rights to their computers and media, can we assure a future with Free Digital communications, which will be the foundation of political discourse, education, and social interaction in the future.

    We must have a Free Digital infrastructure if our people and government will remain as free. This can not be trusted to IBM, HP or MS, but is in the hands of the people.

    Join NY Fair Use to pass the Fair Use bill, and turn the DMCA on it's ears.

    --
    http://www.mrbrklyn.com/amsterdam.html http://www.brooklyn-living.com
  49. Similar Tactic to Felton's by cbowland · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Mr. Perens might be trying a similar tactic to Professor Felton. As you recall, Felton essentially tricked the evil doers into sending him a threatening letter which he then tried (unsuccessfully) to use as a basis of prior restraint.

    Looks like Mr. Perens might be able to make a better case for prior restraint now.

    Or maybe he caved, as most of us do that have to live and work in the real world.

    --

    Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
    Teach him to eat and he will fish forever.

    1. Re:Similar Tactic to Felton's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      '..live and work in the real world.'

      You make it sound so honorable and understandable.

      You're a coward. Nothing more.

      Yeah, I'm one, too. I'll admit it, though.

  50. Theft is not important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DeCSS already doesn't care about region encoding. Not to mention it is the right of the MPAA, or anyone else to say who can use what DVD where. If it wasn't their right to do that, then I have the right to modify the linux kernel, and sell it, without distributing the source.

    Just because you don't like what they are doing with their IP doesn't mean you have the right to steal it. It also doesn't make any efforts to aid in this theft honorable.

    These people don't want some movies viewable in Japan, and some Japanese movies viewable here. If you bought a Japanese movie, too bad for you, you should have read the license... Oh yeah, you did, and you still bought it, thumbing your nose at the owner of the property.

    1. Re:Theft is not important by McCart42 · · Score: 1
      DeCSS already doesn't care about region encoding. Not to mention it is the right of the MPAA, or anyone else to say who can use what DVD where. If it wasn't their right to do that, then I have the right to modify the linux kernel, and sell it, without distributing the source.
      This analogy to the Linux kernel doesn't make sense to me. You say it is the right of the MPAA to say where I can play the DVD I purchased (non-commercial, personal usage of a purchased product), and then you say that this same right is what makes selling slightly modified code illegal (commercial, public sale of a free-as-in-beer product).
      These people don't want some movies viewable in Japan, and some Japanese movies viewable here. If you bought a Japanese movie, too bad for you, you should have read the license... Oh yeah, you did, and you still bought it, thumbing your nose at the owner of the property.
      I don't buy this either. If I bought a Japanese movie, and I want to watch it, then "too bad for me"...what? One would think that I AM the "property owner"...at least as applies to viewing it...what difference should it make where I choose to view it?
      Just because you don't like what they are doing with their IP doesn't mean you have the right to steal it. It also doesn't make any efforts to aid in this theft honorable.
      "Theft" is not an appropriate term for viewing what I lawfully purchased (by the laws of the country of purchase). If I buy firecrackers in a state in which they are legal and transport them over state lines to a state where they are illegal, does that constitute "theft"? It may be breaking another law, but your legal terms need revision. And that's where the muddying of the water occurs--what Perens was trying to demonstrate was the idiocy of the DMCA, and calling his demonstration "theft" is just trying to turn the breaking of a bad law into a justifiable crime.
      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  51. This is what's wrong with the Open Source ideology by MrBrklyn · · Score: 0, Redundant
    This is the essential problem with the Open Source ideology and all too many of the developers who view themselves as Open Source advocates. The issue of the DMCA pales in comparision of anything HP can be funding for OSI, and yet, Bruce Perens is refusing to demonstrate effectively against the DMCA because of the economic interests of HP.

    When NYLXS had it's Business Demonstration at the Graduate Center of CUNY in Manhattan, one young man challenged us when he asked if we should be doing more with IBM on the front of Free Software advocacy. We replied to him that IBM can not be trusted to protect the interests of Free Software, and digital property rights, because IBM is mandated by it's charter as a corperation to protect the interests of it's share holders.

    So while it is true that businesses need freedom to compete in a fair and open market, businesses can not be depended upon to protect that freedom, nor should we expect them to. This is not their function.

    Only through Free Software and political action to protect individual property rights to their computers and media, can we assure a future with Free Digital communications, which will be the foundation of political discourse, education, and social interaction in the future.

    We must have a Free Digital infrastructure if our people and government will remain as free. This can not be trusted to IBM, HP or MS, but is in the hands of the people.

    Join NY Fair Use to pass the Fair Use bill, and turn the DMCA on it's ears.

    --
    http://www.mrbrklyn.com/amsterdam.html http://www.brooklyn-living.com
  52. Another place, another time by RawCode · · Score: 1

    More of these kind of 'stunts' should be done at gatherings where it seems more at home (H2k2, Defcon,..)and more of these gatherings should be held in CANADA (or other places out of the reach of the DMCA).

    1. Re:Another place, another time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      canada has a DMCA also

    2. Re:Another place, another time by schon · · Score: 1

      canada has a DMCA also

      No, it doesn't.

      The Canadian Copyright Board is currently discussing amending copyright law to this effect, but at this stage it's unclear whether such amendments will go as far as the DMCA.

      The response they got to their RFC is neatly summarized here.

  53. Region free is standard in Denmark. by martinm_76 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I haven't seen anyone market a non region-free DVD player in Denmark in at least 2 years now, so in the current situation it would seem to be very good to live outside of America.
    Region-free DVD drives is another matter, though. For some reason they do not seem to be so common.
    As far as I know, though, no law here says anything about you not being allowed to *make* it region free.

    Honestly, I wish the DVD consortium would just let the regions slide. What's so bad about people in region 2 playing region 1 DVDs? Or any other region for that matter. Most people in Europe bye the Region 2 DVDs anyway, but it seems ludicrus to expect people to only be able to view other regions than their own a set number of times before it's all over.
    I hope they realize at some point that all they gain is bad publicity and most likely very little extra capital.
    Most of us in Europe like titles subtitled in our own language, which is doubtfull would be on the DVD region 1 media, unless they finally decided to make one big region 0 disc...

    --
    Regards, /Martin Moeller.
    1. Re:Region free is standard in Denmark. by cocotoni · · Score: 2

      Funny side of the DVD regions is that they were created to protect interests of US studios. Therefore you should not be able to buy a region one DVD and play it in, let's say, Europe (region two), before they decide to sell it on european market, or even before it hits cinemas. But as far as I know no other country but US makes restrictions on region-free DVD players.

      So, if you live in US you do not need to break the DMCA, since you get your DVDs before others and cheaper, and in Europe you do not have DMCA so you can break it as much as you want with region free player.

      There must be something wrong with concept of DVD regions?

    2. Re:Region free is standard in Denmark. by philkerr · · Score: 1
      Possibly not for much longer.

      http://www.eurorights.org/eudmca/.

      This is the EU version of the DMCA. Last I heard it was due to come in Nov. 2002.

    3. Re:Region free is standard in Denmark. by mpe · · Score: 2

      So, if you live in US you do not need to break the DMCA, since you get your DVDs before others and cheaper,

      It's not quite so simple. The US tends to get movies on DVD before the rest of the world. But TV series, especially US/Canadian produced ones, can easily appear on DVD in Europe and Australia on DVD long before they do so in the US.

    4. Re:Region free is standard in Denmark. by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      Hej Martin (fedt navn i øvrigt - samme her, blot Schou til efternavn :-)

      You are absolutely correct about the situation in Denmark at the current time, but come December 23 (as far as I have been able to find out, which is sadly mostly hear-say) Denmark will ratify the European Unions charter, which you can find in Danish here: http://www.fs.dk/jura/loveregl/mfl/eu/pdf/opin_dk. pdf (page 8, chapter III, article 6) and in English here: http://www.fs.dk/uk/acts/eu/pdf/opin_en.pdf

      This charter would make it illegal to basically import/create/sell/buy anything that can be used to circumvent copy protection mechanisms, if those mechanisms are "effective" ... what an "effective" protection is, isn't mentioned, so it could very well include the CSS, even though it has been public knowledge how to defeat that since what ... 1999, using what ... 512 bytes of code or a prime number?

      Just to plug my site (which I hope won't get slashdotted, as that would set my 512kbit U/Dline on fire) I have written an interesting article attempting to start a debate on the subject (which has failed so far). The site can be found at http://fair-use.dk - I can't link to the article, as the annoying CMS doesn't fully support multiple languages, but it's the only article on the site (both in English and Danish) and it's titled "Fair use".
      Anyway, this is just me rambling.

      Forreste - Martin Møller ... det navn lyder bekendt, men jeg kan ikke lige sætte en finger på det ... kan jeg få et hint?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  54. Orwell 2084? by hackus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think, the result from this could be quite serious and doesn't change an otherwise very scary future picture of Internet use in the US.

    The entire fiasco sets a very bad precedent for DMCA observance.

    First of all, Mr. Perens I don't believe acted intelligently, in behalf of the Open Source community, by legally attempting to challenge the law while being employed by someone who has no choice but to observe it.

    I would have thought that would have been common sense, readily realized by Mr. Perens.

    Secondly, this could do some serious damage to the credibility of what Open System Engineering/Source attempts to do:

    That is to free the market place from corporations attempting to garner complete control over every single piece of equipment, professional occupation, or ideas that are produced using a computer, and making it legal (Required by law actually) to tax it at ANY price they see fit.

    If you don't pay that price you can't:

    1) Create Software of any kind.
    2) Own a Computer of any kind.
    3) Access any sort of information of any kind.
    4) Create ideas using digital technoloy of any kind.

    Unless...you pay said corporation a fixed sum, or give up rights to everything you create to said corporation and ONLY use thier products to do so.

    Congress has legislated a DMCA that will destroy this countries IT economy as it tries to compete under those conditions with countries that do not recognize such draconian practices on its populace.

    It will be virtually impossible, for the US to compete in the world economy if patent laws, DMCA laws are allowed to stay in place. How can you produce computers for example when half the cost of the computer is locked in a monopoly market driven software industry in the USA, and hope to undercut local distributors as such in China for example, who are building thier own OS's or preloading Linux on the same computers for 50% less?

    All of this of course is a monpoly that has been legislated by a collusion between industry and government that is making the IT industry in this country extremely ill, running amock with corruption, bad products, and close to ZERO innovation now for the past 4 years.

    Hang on to your Devils and Penguins boys in girls because very very soon, THE MAN will be knocking at your door asking why you are web serfing on a UNAUTHORIZED piece of STATE equipment NOT endorsed by COMPANY X who RUNS THE INTERNET.

    Don't you KNOW SILLY MAN, we need to control what you information you access, use and pay for because you MIGHT BE A TERRORIST.

    Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:Orwell 2084? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ted Kaczynski - is that you?

    2. Re:Orwell 2084? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you smoking, man? Lay off that crack-pipe for a little bit you fucking loser.

    3. Re:Orwell 2084? by hackus · · Score: 2

      Yeah, well, I wish I WAS smoking crack because half of the things I have seen lately in the US makes me think EVERYONE ELSE IS smoking crack.

      Especially the patent office and our dear Congress.

      Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  55. In other news... by Zelet · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news today, the Bush administration finally got the bill it has been seeking. Under current law, any contributor (as long as they are incorporated) of $200,000 or more to a government leader such as a Senator or President may get unconditional control of the U.S. military for 3 months. Supreme Commander, the High and Holy Hollings has announced that Commander Gates has paid for a millennia of U.S. Military control with Peter Pan and Mickey Mouse as Generals. Gates gave the honorary title to S.C.H.H. Hollings for his efforts in passing a bill that would allow MicroDisney to raise and use an elite paramilitary unit to raid and kill evil software/IP pirates with no fear of prosecution or oversight. Not surprisingly, there was little upheaval to this bill. One lady was quoted as saying, "Well, I don't pirate." The software pirates themselves had little comment considering that they were dead.

    Bush, after receiving his check quickly cashed it only to find that there were insufficient funds for payment and realized that the check was actually made in an EZ-Bake oven. Bush, upon complaining to the Supreme Court was found to be a software pirate and killed. The Supreme Court, coincidentally, was also found to be software pirates and killed also.

    Under new leadership the United States of America is now called the U.S.A. Inc. and Subsidiaries.

    In unrelated news, a software glitch at Offutt Air Force Base and Space Command launch a small nuclear attack on China killing 900 million and wounding 150 million more. Gates responded with the offhand remark, "shit happens, don't pirate."

    --
    ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
  56. Hollywood is winning by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

    Hollywood is winning, folks. You are losing. And you'd better start caring.

    Couldn't have said it better myself.

    I do find it quite surprising a huge company such as HP didn't stand up against this. That's sad and disturbing. Come on HP!

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
    1. Re:Hollywood is winning by certron · · Score: 1

      >>Hollywood is winning, folks. You are losing. And you'd better start caring.

      >Couldn't have said it better myself.

      This just gave me an idea. 2 people, with 2 signs, and *lots* of pro-freedom anti-DMCA flyers.

      Sign 1:
      Congress is selling your rights and freedom.

      Sign 2:
      Hollywood is buying.

      Maybe chop out two of the words in Sign 1, but you get the idea. (for clarity, choose rights or freedoms.)

      If you no longer control what you buy, do you really actually own it? If you can't record from your TV, if you can't make a copy of that shiny new (expensive) CD for your car, if you can't take notes from a[n e-]book you bought... do you actually own them?

      --

      fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
      eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
    2. Re:Hollywood is winning by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

      I really like that idea, mind if I go ahead and do it with a friend?

      --
      -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
    3. Re:Hollywood is winning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP is a corporation with no tangible interest in stopping DVD region encoding and such. Why, exactly, would they go out of their way to make enemies?

      Erm, welcome to the corporate world, bub. Corps scratch each other's backs, unless they get into a pissing contest. Then it's all about who has more obscure patents. ;)

    4. Re:Hollywood is winning by certron · · Score: 1

      Do it with whomever you like. In fact, I encourage anyone to Steal This Meme (or something).

      One of the problems I sometimes see (and I have done it myself) is that the message is too complicated and convoluted and no one really can get it. Compare and contrast: "Abolish Legalized Corporate Tyranny" with "Freedom Good. DMCA Bad."

      Flyers good. Unclear signs bad.

      I would love for you to do this. And yes, a friend is good. :-) My preferred method is to get 2 3/4 inch wooden dowels (or less, but 3/4 inch is the max allowed for DC, I think, as I learned for Jan 20th, 2000. Whatever ones I have (that you have no way to see) are legal. Yeah, so that doesn't help.) and tape your sign in between the two poles, with a little space above and below the ends of the poles. This way you can hold it up if you have to, or put it on the ground and stick your feet under it, if you have to. This way your arms don't get tired all the time. Anyway!

      --

      fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
      eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
  57. Re:WHAT A PUSSY!!! by JPawloski · · Score: 0

    "If you're not willing to make a public demonstration of violating the DCMA yourself, you have NO RIGHT to call the guy names"

    Um, last time I purused the constitution, I didn't see that clause. Could you please expand a little? Or maybe you should GET A FUCKING CLUE about our "rights", jackass.

    Jason

  58. No, that's the whole problem by Interrobang · · Score: 2
    Good, finally a company doing what is right for the people that OWN the company. I guess Enron, Worldcom and a few others should have done that too.
    Actually, believing that shareholders "own" the company, and that the most important thing to do is to keep the shareholders happy is precisely what got Enron, Worldcom, Tyco, and others in trouble -- they were so concerned with inflating (artificially) their share prices (to benefit their insider-trading shareholders) that they lost track of what really drives businesses' success or failure: keeping their customers (internal or external) happy. Speculation is precisely that: speculation. It truly doesn't create wealth (in any conventional sense), but it certainly has the potential to destroy it, as we learned when the entire Enron pension fund went belly-up.

    Let's hope that HP has a little more sense than to let shareholders dictate their entire company policy out of their self-interests (what about HP's customers?), whether or not Perens ever goes on stage. Still, I thought it would have been interesting to see.

    Legal issues aside, I'm not sure how Perens' planned demonstration would affect HP customers...
    1. Re:No, that's the whole problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that is not right at all. If you believe artificially inflating stock prices is good for the equity investor (who are the owners of the company period... thats what equity means) than you are no more right than the corrupt execs. The execs did what they did solely for their own benefit, they completely disregarded the institutionals and individual investors.

      The exec's job (as well as all the other employees in the company) is to add value to the company, not satisfy the customer... however, the primary way to add value is to provide a product/service that satisfies a customers needs.

      Worldcom did address customer needs, their problems had nothing to do with their treatment of the customer. Worldcom execs, however, failed to address shareholder needs.. it's that simple. Enron was no different. If Woldcom execs had simply conducted business from the perspective of enhancing the company's value, they would not have ended up in the position they are today.

    2. Re:No, that's the whole problem by nuggz · · Score: 2

      And those shareholders got what they asked for.
      They asked for stupidly high share prices, they got stupidly high share prices.

    3. Re:No, that's the whole problem by axlrosen · · Score: 2

      The most important thing for your company to do is to keep your shareholders happy, but one of the best ways to do this is to keep your customers happy. However, you also need to keep costs low, keep your employees happy, keep from getting sued, etc. It's a big balancing act. "Keep the customers happy, give them what they want, and your business will succeed" sounds good but of course it's not that simple. Your customers want a great product for free, and you can't give them that.

      These guys tried to keep their shareholders happy by illegal, and short-term, means. They gambled that they could keep it going, and not get caught, and they lost. Companies that use different means to keep their shareholders happy in the long term will eventually win out, in the long run. It's those kinds of companies that care about keeping their customers happy (among other things).

    4. Re:No, that's the whole problem by bskin · · Score: 2

      Actually, believing that shareholders "own" the company,

      It's hard to let this pass. Owning the company is the definition of what a shareholder is. This is not a misguided view, it is simple fact.

      --b.

      --
      hot foreign sheep.
    5. Re:No, that's the whole problem by unitron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nowadays shareholders own companies about like people own commercial software. You bought it, but someone else controls it.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  59. Then he's gutless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Bruce supports the GPL - something that 'stops the EVIL capitolist' from 'stealing' code.
    Bruce is willing to disobey the DMCA - a law bought by the 'EVIL capitolists'.

    But when the HP master yanks on his leash and says "HEEL", Bruce falls in line quickly.

    Yea.... "Linux will never be destroyed because no company controls it". Right. All the talk of revolution is pure BS. Because as soon as the boss cracks the whip, the 'fight' vs 'the man' is over.

    Personally, I'm supprised his wife would have let him do it. "Gee Bruce you could loose your job, then how will the kid be paid for?"

  60. I don't think it's the DMCA specifically here by Vicegrip · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem here, as has been meentionned in other posts, is that Perens is at this conference as a representative of HP. As such, HP could be held liable for whatever "illegal" acts he does at this conference.

    It's not a function of the DMCA, it is the way general liability is construed to function by the courts in the USA. Otherwise put, you'll be hard pressed to find *any* company terribly eager to sponsor you directly or indirectly for your civil disobedience. When you're on somebody else's coin, they have a big say on what you do.

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
    1. Re:I don't think it's the DMCA specifically here by alienmole · · Score: 2
      What's special about the DMCA is the extreme degree of punitiveness of the penalties it allows. For the "offense" Perens was planning to commit, it makes no sense (except to an RIAA member) that anyone should be on the hook for years in jail and $500,000 in fines - especially considering that the offense in question is actually no offense at all, under previously extant accepted legal fair use principles.

      So my point is that the DMCA protects itself against challenges by being so extreme - if no one is willing to violate it and test its legality in court, and may be left standing despite the fact that it violates long-established legal principles.

      Aside from anything else, this is rather disturbing in its implications for future laws: to avoid challenges to bad laws, the creators simply have to make sure that the punishment is serious enough to discourage such challenges. Allowing the DMCA to stand sets a bad example for future corporate-sponsored laws. Corporations are succeeding in creating large, blunt instruments that they can wield without ever going to court. Yes, this has long been the case in the US legal system, but the DMCA is an extreme example.

  61. someone is going to have to follow thru..... by tx_mgm · · Score: 1

    ....before anything can be done about the DMCA. lawmakers arent going to just repeal it one day because they finally figured out that it is completely wrong. before anything is going to be done about it, someone has to take it to court.
    i suggest someone out there with balls prepare your legal defence (it will be a hard fight, but a very noble cause) and then go out and do what this guy couldnt.

    --
    Gentlemen...BEHOLD!
    -Dr. Weird
  62. Discrimination? by viper21 · · Score: 2

    Isn't region coding some sort of geographical discrimination?

    -S

  63. Expected. by crucini · · Score: 2

    I pretty much expected some lawyer at MPAA/DVDCCA to call HP's legal department and warn them that an employee might be exposing them to liability. Whether there really is any liability or not, it's easiest for the company to put the brakes on.
    And that's probably what happened.
    Similarly, Cadence contractor James Hanna was fired for involvement in pro-Palestinian activism.

  64. So who among you will take up the fight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, so Bruce can't do this because he's threatened with poorness. Who among you can stand up and take his place? He knows what he wanted to do, you know what he wanted to do. Hell, why not a dozen... or two dozen people show up to violate the DMCA at the conference? Things like this are the reason the DMCA's of the world stay in power, nobody will stand up.

    1. Re:So who among you will take up the fight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Picture 50,000 little ghosts with the words "Not me" on them running off into the ether ala Family Circus.

  65. where is Bruce today? by oliphaunt · · Score: 2

    In the original story yesterday, Bruce posted at least 3 comments (that were all modded up to 5 almost instantly). Where is Bruce today?

    You said you knew some good lawyers, Bruce. Did they tell you something new? Did /. ruin the party for you? What happened?

    --




    Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
    1. Re:where is Bruce today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably sitting around wondering how the hell to dig himself out of this hole he just dug for himself. When he decides on an explanation, he will re-emerge.

    2. Re:where is Bruce today? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I was at OSCON giving my talk. And then in an airplane back to Oakland. What did you think?

      Bruce

    3. Re:where is Bruce today? by oliphaunt · · Score: 2

      I was afraid T H E Y had gotten to you. I'll just go put my tinfoil hat back on now...

      --




      Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
    4. Re:where is Bruce today? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Funny
      OK. I thought you expected me to have slashdot attached at the hip :-)

      Bruce

  66. Only thing by xihr · · Score: 1

    Only thing lamer than doing something dumb is threatening to do something dumb and then backing out at the last minute.

  67. I am just curious ("true patriots"..) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you do this?

    If you think that Parens should quit a really good job in which he does rewarding work and helps the community in order to make a public point about the DMCA, you should be willing to do the same. You could hire a lawyer, break the DMCA publicly ("posting decss source code on slashdot" is not "publicly", i mean in a way that attracts publicity-- umm, and it has to be good publicity, writing a new napster and saying you're doing it to "stick it to the man" just makes things worse, you have to be doing something purely ethical), and become a test case. Why don't you? It would cost some of your personal money, but then, what the hey, Parens quitting his job would do the same to him. Why should Parens have to be the one to do this?

    Parens making his employer unhappy just to prove a point is not going to help anything. Publicly breaking the law on stage in hopes of getting a bad law repealed is patriotic; however, doing it in bad or ineffectual circumstances just because You Said You Would isn't patriotic or "principled", it's just bullheaded stubborn and stupid. This story discussion is one of the most hypocritical i've seen on slashdot. What the hell is with people like this? They can do the public civil disobedience thing just as easily as parens, even if they don't have a slot registered at a big convention.

    Getting back to "true patriots", in the 60s we had mass sit-ins and LARGE SCALE instances of civil disobedience; why is it that we can't get the slashdot/open source community to do things like that? Why does the OSS community just demand that "someone who's famous, and stuff" do the dirty work, and sit around at home?

    If you want the OSS community to have some true patriots, take up the WIDE-SCALE movements from the 60s. What did they do? Well, they did public civil disobedience actions, like walking in and sitting down in segregated bars, that were too large-scale for everyone to get arrested. They boycotted the montgomery bus system until a bad policy was changed. While in this case boycotts and mass civil disobedience are mutually exclusive (you can't break just the DMCA without buying something). The "slashdot community" isn't willing to do either. They just yell at Bruce Parens and demand he do it for them. Some community.

    1. Re:I am just curious ("true patriots"..) by ultima · · Score: 1

      Why don't I? Why don't other people? I don't have the cash to hire a lawyer; I'm in debt. Money wins here. I think it is likely other people are in the same position.

      People are very attached to what they have; they are scared to let go of it, even if it is to seek something better.

      I must admit that I don't think Perens' idea was very creative. I would be more willing to do something more effectual; to break the law without doing *any* harm. To find many easy ways to break the law without doing *any* harm -- when this is possible for a law, then the law (IMO)is bad.

      Showing people how to steal movies is rather silly; what about showing people how to chip their XBox so they can write their own games? Or use a load of cheap $200 computers to serve up their MP3s or home pages or simple databases?

      Now *that* would be violating the law harmlessly :)

    2. Re:I am just curious ("true patriots"..) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. Fair enough, then.

      See you.

      --AC #3960608

    3. Re:I am just curious ("true patriots"..) by walt-sjc · · Score: 2

      Your right. I'm SURE Bruce has wads of cash on par with that of the MPAA and other hollywood groups to defend himself. *Snort*

      I also suggest that you RTFA as he wasn't going to show people how to "steal" movies, but rather show them how to play a DVD they PURCHASED in another region. This is a was a VERY good way to show how the DMCA violates free speech and harms consumers, yet now we will have to settle for another demonstration of the "chilling effect" that the DMCA has on free speech.

    4. Re:I am just curious ("true patriots"..) by ultima · · Score: 1

      You are right; I forgot about that. Sorry :)

      Though it doesn't seem like disabling region protection on a DVD player to get around region encoding should actually be illegal; since regions have nothing to do with copy protection (piracy; if you are able to duplicate DVDs, it should be trivial to remove region encodings from them) and everything to do with control of when and where a particular dvd becomes playable.

      So...IANAL...how is removing region checking from a DVD player illegal?

    5. Re:I am just curious ("true patriots"..) by walt-sjc · · Score: 2

      As others have stated, removing the region restriction is circumventing a copyright protection mechanism and therefore violates the DMCA.

      The DMCA has a number of parts that violate free speech and ignores the court-upheld right of "fair use." This is why so many are opposed to it. The problem we have is that there hasn't been a good case where someone's free speech rights were violated - this is a prerequisite for a court challenge.

      One of the problems with our legal system is that it is VERY hard to challenge a law without a case proving that someone's rights were violated. The courts don't want to hear about what MAY happen, they want to rule on what DID happen. Felton tried to overturn a part of the DMCA due to a "threat" letter, but since no legal action was taken against him, the case was thrown out.

  68. Heh by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 2

    Time to burn off some karma stating the obvious:
    HP has been such a conservative company, and getting more so, I'm hardly suprised.

    And the cynical BOFH type I'm becoming says think about the following:

    Carley could not sell the Compaq merger to HP (had to force it thru).

    Bruce could not sell a DMCA violation to HP. (hey, neither could 2600 to a biased MPAA judge)

    HP can't sell printers to Dell anymore (or something to that effect).

    Bruce has the balls to do it, but HP doesn't have the guts to back him on this one, because, if they did, they'd do what Gateway did to the RIAA, because all the things that made HP great are gone or slipping away.
    Think about it: HP was great because the founders were *ENGINEERS*, much like Appl*B**'s is run by chefs. Now HP is run by..., well,... PHB's.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  69. Re:WHAT A PUSSY!!! by paladin_tom · · Score: 0, Insightful

    If you can't tell the difference between Constitutional rights, and moral high-ground "rights", that's no concern of mine.

    Furthermore, since I'm not an American, I don't need to know jack about your Constitution. I do understand, however, that it's honoured beside another American document that makes blatant racial slurs against natives (ie., the Declaration of Independence).

    --
    #define sig "Every social system runs on the people's belief in it."
  70. What If.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I don't know how good of an idea this is. But here it is anyways.

    Have someone else record the process on video tape, use fake names, and not show the faces... Then play it at the conference. Think about it. He is still not demonstrating how to do it. Someone else is. :)

    Well either way I doubt this will happen. But hey it was an idea!

  71. Simple Question by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

    Why, in the current financial climate of America, would HP do or allow an employee to do anything that may garner the attention of government authorities?

    In addition, why would any company that could potentially profit (directly or indirectly) from the DMCA, question it?

    I don't know the answer to breaking the stranglehold of the DMCA; nor do I have the answer on how to educate our lawmakers in order to get better, fairer laws. I can only hope that one day open-source companies/projects are the majority and profit-minded, stock-option hoarding, multi-national conglomerate's are the minority.

  72. HP did what it had to do... by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As much as I dislike HP (and risk losing mod points), I have to say that I understand their position.

    Our legal system is so screwed up that there's a distinct possibility that **AA might be able to find HP liable in some way for Perens' actions. Even if they don't, it's worth it to the **AA to try.

    HP, understandably, would prefer not to have to spend untold millions of dollars defending itself against this.

    While I, too, wish HP was willing to risk the liability for the chance to stand up for what's Right, I understand their position. And I understand that Perens understands their position. And so I understand why Perens is backing out. I don't blame him, and I full believe that he intended to go through with it. But there's no reason/point/honor in exposing your employer to multi=-million dollar liability (or multi-million dollar legal bills) unless the entire company is will to stand behind his actions.

    Maybe next time..

  73. Someone please explain.... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    How in the 9 hells a company can tell an employee what to do on his own time. I would simply stop working for a company like that, whatever I do on my own time is MINE!

    The only thing I can see is he was already doing something at the conferance that tied in with HP or he was doing for HP, and he was going to the civil dis. in which case we get into a possible conflict of intrest.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Someone please explain.... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Because in this case, the actions of the person would directly reflect on the actions of the company?

      Plantiff: Your Honor, we believe that HP illegally stole our stuff.
      HP: That's ridiculous.
      Plantiff: Oh? Like your employee Bruce Perens breaking the DMCA and pirating DVDs live, on stage?
      HP: .....bloody hell.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Someone please explain.... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      The logic of that is flawed. Was he working for the company when he did so? If not it's none of their business. If they think it is, then they(HP) is violating his 1st Ammendment rights.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:Someone please explain.... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Bull. They're perfectly free to say 'if you have a history of breaking the law in our field, we will terminate your employment.'

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:Someone please explain.... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Right, and I have the right to say since you are infringing on my first ammendment right, I have the right to sue for back pay, and re-employment or fair settlement with your company.

      You won't see it happen in canada, your more likly to see it happen in the states. Read the laws.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Someone please explain.... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      They're not infringing on any rights. They're merely stating that if he takes action A, they'll take action B in response. They're not RESTRAINING him in any way. He's perfectly free to do whatever the hell he wants.

      Besides, freedom of speech doesn't apply to criminal acts, even if the act should not, by any stretch of the imagination, SHOULD be criminal.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    6. Re:Someone please explain.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is not a criminal act until a jury convicts

    7. Re:Someone please explain.... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are. A good example is, you work at company a, and they say you can and must only drive car z, otherwise we'll fire you.

      What is the diffrence? That he's not breaking the law, however "legal" the DMCA is in the eyes of geeks everywhere.

      The DMCA is draconian at the least. Any goverment or law that restricts me from publicly discussing my own property, or the security measures should be illegal. And restricting research to block someones poor attempt at a security scheme is crap. Ala the who SDMI fiasco.

      Your welcome to live in a country that dictates what and what you can't see or discuss but I will not be a sheep.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  74. Wrong tactic by af_robot · · Score: 1

    He should ask HP's permission to demonstrate how to modify * DELL printers * to accept any non-dell-manufactured-cartridges. (and violate the DMCA as well).
    I'm sure they would agree to this.
    :)

  75. WHY should DMCA protect region coding at all? by Wolfier · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought a copyright act should only protect copyright, or in the case of DMCA, methods to protect copyright!!

    Region coding has nothing to do with "copyright" at all, just a lame money grabbing scheme!! Why should the DMCA protect it?

    The word in the law is "protect access to copyrighted works".

    What "Access"? So if a publisher put glues on the CD cover so it sticks to your hand, is washing the glue off and throwing it away a circumvention and thus breaks the law?

    This "Access" thing has to be more unambigously defined! It should REALLY be changed to "protect reproduction access to copyrighted works"!! What's so hard to understand? Let's make a case to change the word in the law!

  76. Or maybe... by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

    XXAA vs Hewlett Packard the Honorable Judge Halfaclu presiding

    Judge Halfaclu: Call your first witness.
    Lawyer: I call Bruce Perens. Mr. Perens, did you have a discussion with Hewlett Packard regarding a possible DMCA violation?
    Bruce Perens: Yes. They told me not to do it.
    Lawyer: And what did you say?
    Bruce Perens: I said "OK", I won't do it.
    Lawyer: And then what happened?
    Bruce Perens: I changed my mind and did it anyway.
    Lawyer: Against Hewlett Packard's specific request?
    Bruce Perens: Yes.
    Lawyer: So Hewlett Packard didn't know?
    Bruce Perens: No.
    Lawyer: And even if they had known, was there any way they could have prevented it?
    Bruce Perens: "Any way"? Ummm, well I guess they could have hit me with a baseball bat and locked me in a dungeon.
    (laughter)
    Lawyer: I mean was there any legal way they could have prevented it?
    Bruce Perens: Umm, none that I know of... but, ahhh, I am not a laywer. Some of my friends are laywers though.
    Lawyer: Thank you. No further questions
    Judge Halfaclu: CASE DISSMISSED AGAINST HEWLETT PACKARD. Prosecution may procede against the defendant Bruce Perens.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  77. Dell not selling HP printers by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1
    HP can't sell printers to Dell anymore (or something to that effect).

    It's not can't. It's won't. Big difference.

    There are rumors that Dell is going to enter the printer market with Dell-labeled printers ("Dude, you printed!"). So HP stopped supplying printers to a potential competitor. It's all rather stupid.

    See News.com article for details.

    1. Re:Dell not selling HP printers by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      Yes, more correct, thanks. the "won't" crossed my mind, but dealing with *ell currently has been more pain than it is worth today.

      Got a call *after* 5pm today, I just happened to be there because I was needed and 'ring, ring'.

      This being sysadmin day and all, I should not be exposed to this BS, but I guess *ell never got that memo/clue. *sigh*

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  78. Sorry, I don't care by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    Hollywood is winning, folks. You are losing. And you'd better start caring.

    Losing what? The ability to play DVDs from another country? It seems to me that the only one losing anything is Hollywood, since I won't buy DVDs which I can't play. Not that it would be a problem if I really needed to play them anyway. I have DeCSS.

    1. Re:Sorry, I don't care by rainmanjag · · Score: 1

      Losing what?! Losing what?! The issue has absolutely nothing to do with regional encoding... that's merely a very mild symptom... Hollywood is winning the ability to use the DMCA to coerce individuals and corporations to bend to their will... and we are losing the ability to have freedom with the information that we've legally paid to have access to (e.g. the information on a region-encoded DVD)... that is why people better start caring... because the day may not be distant when your CD player, your PC, your DVD player, even your car stereo will have to ask permission from the MPAA or RIAA before being able to play a piece of media, even if it's legally obtained... freedom is at risk... I @!$#ing care about that...

      --
      http://starboard.flowtheory.net/
    2. Re:Sorry, I don't care by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hollywood is winning the ability to use the DMCA to coerce individuals and corporations to bend to their will...

      So don't buy their products. It's really not that difficult.

      and we are losing the ability to have freedom with the information that we've legally paid to have access to (e.g. the information on a region-encoded DVD)...

      We've already lost that ability. That's what copyright law is all about. Also, see above. If you don't like it, don't buy it.

      that is why people better start caring... because the day may not be distant when your CD player, your PC, your DVD player, even your car stereo will have to ask permission from the MPAA or RIAA before being able to play a piece of media, even if it's legally obtained...

      If you don't like it, don't buy it.

      freedom is at risk... I @!$#ing care about that...

      Very little actual freedom is at risk, unless you mean the freedom to profit off the copyright infringement of others. How has the DMCA affected your life? It hasn't affected mine one bit. But then again, I'm not profiting off the copyright infringement of others. Go figure.

    3. Re:Sorry, I don't care by rainmanjag · · Score: 1

      I'll give you a wonderful example of how the DMCA has affected my life. I use Linux on the desktop. I legally own several DVDs. I purchased them. I did not download them. I did not burn them. The studio got their money. I would love to take them with me on trips and view them on my laptop. However, I cannot; alas there is no DVD player for Linux that includes a CSS decoder. Not that there aren't projects that can't; Xine is in a great position to. But they are legally not able to because of the DMCA. I can't watch a movie I bought on my laptop because of the DMCA. That sucks. That's freedom being lost. And that's an example of how it affects my life. And I'm not profiting off the copyright infringement of others either.

      Go figure.

      --
      http://starboard.flowtheory.net/
    4. Re:Sorry, I don't care by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2
  79. Another totally pathetic bullshit plan DOA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  80. I respect HP's decision. by tshak · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I respect HP's decision. However, I think this shows yet again how much power a corporation has over an individual. Welcome to the United Corporations of America.

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  81. prelude... by skydude_20 · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't he just have a prelude to his speech explaining in detail how what he is doing is not endorsed by his employeer and what he is doing now on stage does not carry back to his profession, that they are two distant things, etc....

    the only thing he is doing is excersising his free speech abilities...

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
  82. Law of the Land, or at least Delaware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If HP is incorporated in Deleware, then they have to consider shareholder value first. The law in Delaware allows them no freedom in that. I know this because my employer is being acquired not because it makes sense for the company or its employees, but because a large enough premium was being offered; thereby forcing the board to agree or face shareholder lawsuits!

    1. Re:Law of the Land, or at least Delaware by Oswald · · Score: 1

      Well, for what little the information is worth, yes, HP is a Delaware corporation.

  83. Umm well probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A heck of a lot simpler than one would think it's the old DataHaven delema:
    Percins: I'm going to break DMCA on porpus
    Law: that'll cost 50k
    Percins:who do I make my check to?
    Law:MPAA.com
    HP:WOO WOOOO WOOOO hold on their BOTH of you:
    That'll cost you your' job, your' interviews
    and mr.law we already don't have tight region standards
    Percins:I'll not beable to foot the bill you
    say? What lines from my speach should I scan and PDF again?
    HP:here to here, and thank you for you'r cooperations we understand it as you had a mentalbreak

  84. Where IS Bruce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHere's he at? He reads AND posts to slashdot. WHy isn't he posting his stance now?

    1. Re:Where IS Bruce? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you want to post if your explanation was that money just bought your principles?

    2. Re:Where IS Bruce? by porkface · · Score: 1

      Maybe, if only to brag that I'm rich.

  85. Bruce Perens - Corporate Slave by phpinfo() · · Score: 1

    The last time I checked, my employer does not own me. It all comes down to the love of money. If Bruce was truly the advocate he advertises himself to be, he would do the demo. Bruce, you just lost my respect. Enjoy your HP salary, provided by all the ripped off inkjet customers.

    1. Re:Bruce Perens - Corporate Slave by AceCaseOR · · Score: 0
      Hey! Think about it through his shoes. He does the demo, he's unemployed. Unemployed=no money. This will also make things more difficult for him to get a job because if a potential employer checks back at HP and finds out why he was fired, he won't get hired.

      Frankly, I don't believe in "selling out" except in certain circumstances. Metallica sold out. Bruce Perens didn't not. Bruce Perens made sure that he can still be a voice from inside the industry.

      Which would you prefer? That he gives his expose and be cut off from all his sources and resources that allowed him to do his expose, or that he be able to continue to pass on information to we /.ers.

      What would you do in his position, risking what he would have been risking. Also, he may also have a wife and kids. Would you be willing to risk a marrage just to spill the beans. You may be a legend on /. for standing up to the MPAA, but that may not mean jack shit to his wife.

      Things are rarely black and white. There are almost always shades of grey.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  86. Send it to me by famazza · · Score: 1

    Please, send to me his article, I'll proudly publish it here in Brazil.

    Or maybe somewhere else in Europe!

    You can call me Troll, but DMCA sux!

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
  87. So who is going to step up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    soneone could certainly stand next to him and do the demonstration.

    Who is it going to be?

  88. For those conspiracy theorists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember who one of HP's early big clients was? HP equipment was used in the production of _Fantasia_, a Disney film. When I last worked for HP, they had a 50th anniversary celibration and _Fantasia_ was mentioned as being a large part of making HP happen.

    I think we all know how interested Disney is in protecting their phoney-baloney jobs, gentlemen... For those who aren't search google for information on how the length of copyright keeps getting increased just as Steamboat Willie (the first Mickey Mouse cartoon) is about to come out of protection.

    Sean

  89. What's that I smell? Oh yeah... PUSSY ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  90. Cracking Regions is Not a Violation by cvd6262 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Region codes are neither encryption nor copy protection. Ergo, breaking it does not constitutes a DMCA violation.

    --

    I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    1. Re:Cracking Regions is Not a Violation by Vann_v2 · · Score: 1

      17 USC 1201:
      No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.

      Does region encoding effectively control access to a copyrighted work? Yes? Then the DMCA applies.

    2. Re:Cracking Regions is Not a Violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since the DMCA applies, this lets you effectively control access.

      since it effectively controls access,
      the DMCA applies.

      since the DMCA applies...

      It all depends on whether or not you were
      on the merry-go-round when it started up.
      Personally, it hasn't effectively controlled
      access, so I don't feel bound by it.

  91. ESR has DeCSS on home page. by dredick · · Score: 1

    Eric Raymond has had the DeCSS source code on his page for a loooong time now. So its not like no one else is doing this.

    http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/css-auth.tar.gz

  92. Who didn't see this coming? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    I think it was more of a ploy by Perens to get attention to the DMCA (and himself). Did it work? I don't know, /. is the only place I saw the story.

  93. I want HP to participate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Written by someone who does not seem to be employed in the corporate world. How can you possibly expect any company to openly endorse a law-breaking event?

    you're right, the poster might have naive. but, at the same time, he raises interesting questions that you dismiss.

    "civil disobedience" has a distinguished history in our society as a way for oppressed and aggreived people to gain their rights. why is there not an legal avenue where corporations can pursue similar courses of action?

    HP should form a subsidiary and spin it off, one that employs Bruce Perens and stands to get sued.

  94. Why should he bother by imnoteddy · · Score: 3, Informative
    ... and why should the audience listen when a simple Google search finds the info for you?

    IANA DMCA violater but did you know that many DVD players have their firmware in FLASH ROMs? And that if you insert a CD into one of these with files named and formatted properly the FLASH will automagically update? This must very convenient for the manufacturer if a firmware bug is found.

    I certainly can't imagine that anyone could think of another use for this feature. :)

    --
    No electrons were harmed creating this post, though some may have been subjected to electrical and/or magnetic fields.
  95. Give ME Some of the Crack you are smoking by dbretton · · Score: 2

    The last thing that the entertainment cartel wants to do is to force a large, respectable corporation with deep pockets into a position of having to defend itself against a DCMA violation.

    The entertainment cartel (or, rather, their enforcers: the US government) would not prosecute HP. They would prosecute Perens personally. Then, once they defeat Perens in court (by hook or crook), the entertainment cartel will pursue HP, using the legal ruling in the Perens case to seek punitive damages in the tens of millions.

    1. Re:Give ME Some of the Crack you are smoking by donutello · · Score: 2

      More likely, HP will settle out of court. I don't care what a bunch of people who don't understand law think, the DMCA is very likely constitutional and even if it wasn't, HP won't care to fight that battle - it has nothing to gain and everything to lose.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  96. You just made his point by MeNeXT · · Score: 2
    I think you have made his point. Prior to the DMCA he could talk about his research. Now due to the DMCA he is unable to talk about the DMCA. Strange No? Where is the freedom of speech?

    --
    DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
  97. HP? by g4dget · · Score: 2

    Why does this have anything to do with his employer? Is Perens employed by HP for the purpose of breaking DVD players? If he is doing it on his own time, HP shouldn't care and shouldn't be liable (of course, they might still want to fire him for violating a law, but that's another issue).

  98. Great. by sudog · · Score: 1

    The moment a self-proclaimed hero steps into the limelight to do something we could all cheer him on for, lend support, and actually consider him a socially-motivated hero for, he backs out with a "Just kidding."

    Why the hell did he make the claim to begin with without first speaking with his employer, if his employer has that much of a hold over him?!

    LAME!

  99. I second that by linuxlover · · Score: 2

    Dear Mr Perens,
    if you don't like a law, work to *CHANGE IT*, NOT to *BREAKE IT* .

    yours
    a sensible guy!

    1. Re:I second that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Dear Mr Perens,
      if you don't like a law, work to *CHANGE IT*, NOT to *BREAKE IT* .

      Breaking a law via civil disobedience *IS* working to change it.

      That's the whole point - to show the law is sooo flawed ("What?!? He/she's in jail for that?!?") that it must be changed.

    2. Re:I second that by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Breaking it, leading to a public court case in which it is found unconstitutional, is the best way to change it, in this case. As it is in many cases. Demonstrating actively that a law is 1. unenforceable and 2. destructive is far more effective than just saying so.

    3. Re:I second that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dear Mr Perens,
      if you don't like a law, work to *CHANGE IT*, NOT to *BREAKE IT*

      If everyone thought like you, there'd still be white and colored drinking fountains.

  100. Region-tweakable is already here by KC7GR · · Score: 2

    At least it is in some older players. If you're fortunate enough to own a Pioneer DVL-505, 909, or a Pioneer player with similar electronics, Click here for a mod that shows how to make it region-switchable, and another that will kill the Macrovision output on the baseband video side.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  101. Re:[NY Times/WSJ comes to mind and/or AOL/TW] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both of these companies have huge legal budgets and the NY Times has a legal staff that are just waiting to pounce on a 1st Amendment challenge.

    Failing that they definitely have the readership ans csequently the "court of public opinion" on their side. This can be orgainized to financially engulf and devour the enemies...especially with a joint attack along with the WSJ.

  102. Foks, This is Why We Live Under Tyranny by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    Written by someone who does not seem to be employed in the corporate world. How can you possibly expect any company to openly endorse a law-breaking event? Sheesh!

    Folks, this is why we live under tyranny.

    "When good people do nothing, evil flourishes." and all that. Even when we as individuals are willing to stand up to abuses of our constitution, if our Corporate Masters disallow us (and we obey them, valuing our well paying jobs over our freedom), then in fact tyranny will not be stood up to, and it will continue to thrive and grow unabated.

    Worse still, those entities which have the means to do something about this kind of thing generally have no interest in doing so, no matter how just or right the cause.

    This is an example of precisely the reason people cannot be moved to put up a fight when their freedoms are trampled ... even those of good conscience put their jobs, and thus their employer's interests, first, and their own liberty (and that of their children) a distant second.

    Until this changes we will lose, again and again. I for one do not expect it to change until conditions become absolutely intolerable, and as much as it pains me to see the Internet neutered in much the same way the printing press, the telephone, television, and radio have been (take from the hands of the common man and restricted to the elite), I do not think losing the internet or losing general purpose personal computers, and the exponential growth in technology they have enabled, will come anywhere close to the levels of deprivation required for people to, finally, get off their overfed, apathatic, cowardly asses.

    This is just the beginning, folks. Get used to it.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  103. PUSSY. by Blaede · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Big bad hacker. Please.

    1. Re:PUSSY. by tomlord · · Score: 1

      Son, that's Mr. Pussy, to you.

  104. Historical Context by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    as much as it pains me to see the Internet neutered in much the same way the printing press, the telephone, television, and radio have been (take from the hands of the common man and restricted to the elite), I do not think losing the internet or losing general purpose personal computers, and the exponential growth in technology they have enabled, will come anywhere close to the levels of deprivation required for people to, finally, get off their overfed, apathatic, cowardly asses.

    In rereading it I see that this probably isn't terribly clear to a lot of people. Historically, government (and entrenched oligarchs, which are essentially one and the same) have moved very quickly to restrict any new medium of communication from control by the common person.

    The british crown did this with the emergence of the printing press, creating the first iteration of copyright, which restricted who was allowed to possess a printing press and publish and provided extremely harsh punishment for anyone violating the restrictions (including drawing and quartering, which happened to more than one independent publisher). These restrictions had absolutely nothing to do with artists being compensated, its sole purpose was to create a cartel of publishers answerable to the Crown, whome the Crown could keep under tight control.

    In the early days of the telephone there were numerous, competing companies. At the time the U.S. government chose to legislate a nationwide monopoly, granting said monopoly to AT&T (who enjoyed this privelege for several decades). The 'excuse' was that this was the only way to have a coherent, interoperable network. The truth was quite different ... already these regional, and in some cases competing, companies were connecting their networks together. That did not stop the government from putting almost all them out of business, overnight.

    Radio and Television are similar. The FCC has been extremely draconian in its regulation of the spectrum, a spectrum which many have argued quite compellingly could have done without regulation altogether, or have been much more losely regulated through civil law ('your signal may not interfere with the pre-existing signal, interference defined by these measurable parameters, otherwise you are free to broadcast where, when, how, and on what frequency you like').

    Instead we have an FCC which made it illegal to create your own private radio or TV station almost from the start, has placed the bar in terms of money and equipment so high that no one other than a large company can afford to enter the business, and yet has turned around and given away large portion of the same airwaves to the same, well entrenched, elite interests.

    Now we have the internet and open, general computing, creating a revolution in communications the likes of which the world hasn't seen since the printing press or the advent of radio and television. In the historical context I've outlined above it should surprise none of us that a coordinated, deliberate, well financed, and thus far quite effective campaign is being waged to take the internet out of the hands of the common man, and place the tools for publishing and disseminating information back into the hands of the elite.

    Essentially the same oligarchs (or rather, their descendents) want to control what we see, hear, and ultimately what we say now as did when the printing press, telephone, radio, and television were first invented. And, so long as we obey our corporate masters and refrain from speaking up on their cue, they will continue to succeed in doing so, with hardly a voice raised in protest against them.

    Frankly, by being so beholden to our fat, well paying jobs, and putting profit before freedom, we are getting exactly what we deserve.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Historical Context by evbergen · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother. Couldn't have said it better, not by a long shot.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
  105. Mr Perens, I have a solution for you. by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Give your presentation as per advised by your employer, which is the smart thing to do.

    Also, make your original presentation available on a CD-rom and attach a EULA to it reading:

    "By agreeing to this EULA you will not hold HP, Bruce Perens or any attendees of this conference, personally, legally, ethically, morally, physically, mentally, emotionally or any other *lly for that matter.
    If you are a member of the RIAA, MPAA, ABA, law enforcement (genus homo sapien or canine), political or judicial in nature, you hereby agree to stop breeding, kill any offspring and other kin you may have and then stop breathing should you have any need, want, desire, thought, inkling or idea to do or be the initiator, participant, party to or of any kind of lawsuit, harassment, annoyance or flatulance against Bruce Perens and HP.
    Failure to comply with the above and you will pay the legal fees of the prosecution, defense, judge, jury, state in which you file, donate to the EFF no less than the senator from Disney has been bribed...err...funded per day and sing "I'm a Lumberjack" every hour until the trial (which should not happen in the first place, but you had to be a dick about it) proceedes and co-council will have to say 'bork, bork, bork' every 20th word".


    Not only will you challenge the BS that is the DMCA but the EULA as well...because if the above EULA is valid and legally binding, well, somebody needs to lay off the crackpipe, get a sense of humor and be beaten by a clue stick before they can even approach the DMCA violation that they agreed to not to do anything about....and you just know it'll have to be submitted in original form, heh!!

    Feel free to add more asinine stuff and legalese up the arse with HP's lawyers... and find one with a mean streak who enjoys fscking with other lawyers.

    Now, if you will excuse me, I'm going to rip AC/DC's song "Big Balls" to MP3....JUST BECAUSE I CAN.....muaahahahahahahaha.

    .

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:Mr Perens, I have a solution for you. by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2

      Oh. My. God.

      Please please please do it from Maryland! Then we can add the UCITA click-wrap licenses to the whole mess.

  106. If HP was worried about by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    shareholders they would have fired that LOUSY CEO long time ago. What they are worried about is the LAWYERS and 400 years of court battles.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  107. Pathetic by ikekrull · · Score: 2

    Why did you ever think HP would let you 'get away with this', Bruce?

    Its quite clear that your masters will never allow you to take such anti-establishment actions while in their employ.

    Its quite clear that corporate america and Open Source software / personal freedom just don't mix, and I think your credibility as an advocate of either principle just took a big nosedive.

    How long before you'll be rolled out on stage to espouse the benefits to the consumer of the closed-source DRM/DMCA-enforcement kernel modules in HP-Linux?

    --
    I gots ta ding a ding dang my dang a long ling long
  108. Knowledge of Regioning by jsdkl · · Score: 1

    Actually, most people who purchase DVD players and DVDs do not know about the restrictions they are purchasing. Every person I discuss my issues with the MPAA, DVD Consortium, etc is shocked to learn what they cannot legally do.

  109. Doesn't bother me. by Montezuma58 · · Score: 1

    Most porn is not region coded anyways.

  110. Hold on a minute... by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

    The post says that to demonstrate that would be violating the DMCA. I was under the impression that DVD zones were illegal (by the DMCA) in the first place! I thought I read that here on slashdot.. or am I just too tired?

  111. Look, I may be an AC, but I gotta agree here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perens is being a fantastic shithead here. If he was daring to defy one authority and another, smaller, athority tells him 'no', why back down?

    Simply put, he never should have announced it in the first place.

    What a complete dumbfuck.

  112. Why I stopped bothering. (Serious.) by supabeast! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wussy pansy crap like this is why I gave up on political action with geeks.

    Geeks are wimps. Geeks are happy to complain and bitch online, even writing a paper letter on occasion . But face a geek with some serious attempt to go against the grain, and he collapses.

    Pressure from society, government, and employers scares the living shit out of geeks. I was laid off about a year ago, and found a new job immediately, but took a month off. I spent the first two weeks doing nothing but trying to motivate people into some poltical work with UCITA and the DMCA. The most I got out of it was a couple guys agreeing to write letters if I brought pens, paper, and envelopes to a LUG meeting because they couldn't be bothered to do it themselves.

    We need an event to motivate geeks. Perens has decided not to be the one who does it, although one person being arrested probably won't do much, the last few times it happened people made phone calls, wrote letters, and the the EFF handled the legal stuff. We need something bigger. We need a room full of geeks, or someone like Linus tossed in jail for a very stupid reason. Until that happens, I'll just keep watching like everyone else.

    1. Re:Why I stopped bothering. (Serious.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wussy pansy crap like this is why I gave up. We need someone like Linus. I'll just keep watching.

      Am I the only one who sees irony in this author accusing others of "wussy pansy crap"?

  113. what a puss by crazzyrussian! · · Score: 1

    in russia he would wear no pants

    --
    "Indeed, the ideal for a well-functioning democratic state is like the ideal for a gentleman's well-cut suit- it is not
  114. Will the real Bruce... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    don't forget the old song:

    May I have your attention please,
    may I have your attention please,
    will the real bruce perens please stand up,
    I repeat will the real bruce perens please stand up
    .....we're gonna have a problem here.........

    Ya'll act like you never seen a slash poster before
    mouse all on the floor
    like mom and daddy just burst in the door
    and started whoopin yer ass worse than before
    they first had endorsed
    buyin' ya a crappy computer (aaaaaah)
    It's the return of the...
    "awww..wait, no wait, you're kidding,
    he didn't just say what I think he did,
    did he?"
    and Mr. Cray said...
    nothing you idiots, Mr Cray's dead
    he's locked in my bassment
    microsoft women love Sig '11
    chicka chicka chicka bruce perens,
    "I'm sick of him, lookit him
    walkin around, grabbin his GNU know what
    flippin' to GNU know who"
    "yeah, but he's so smart though"
    yeah, I probably got a couple of screws up in my head loose
    but no worse than what's goin on in your sister's webcam (eheheheh)
    sometimes, I wanna get on ZD and just let loose
    but cant, but it's cool for RMS to hump a dead GNU
    My mouse is on your link, My mouse is on your link
    and if you're lucky, I might just give it a little click
    and that's the message that we deliver to little kids
    and expect them not to know what a free software is
    of course they're gonna know what Microsoft is
    by the time they hit 4th grade
    they got MS-NBC, dont they?
    we ain't nothing but omnivores
    well, some of us carnivores
    who read other people's mail like crackwhores
    but if we can read your e-mail like it's available
    then there's no reason that a man can't forge spam from your account
    but if you feel like I feel, I got the antedote
    trolls wave your penis birds, sing the chorus and it goes........

    I'm Bruce Perens, yes, I'm the real Perens
    all you other Bruce Perens' are just imitating
    so won't the real Bruce Perens please stand up,
    please stand up, please stand up
    cause I'm Bruce Perens, yes, I'm the real Perens
    all you other Bruce Perens' are just imitating
    so wont the real Bruce Perens please stand up,
    please stand up, please stand up

    Sig 11 don't got to cuss in his posts to get Karma
    well I do, so fuck him and fuck you too
    you think I give a damn about my Karma
    half of you trolls can't even stomach me, let alone stand me
    "but bruce, what if you win, wouldn't it be weird"
    why? so you guys can just lie to get me here
    so you can sit me here next to Natalie here
    shit,Enoch Root's momma better switch me chairs
    so I can sit next to trollmastah and Post First
    and hear em argue over who modded it down first
    little troll, flamed me back on IRC
    "yeah, he's fast, but I think he types one-handed, hee hee"
    I should download some audio on MP3
    and show the world how you released it BSD (aaaaaah)
    I'm sick of you little troll and l33t groups
    all you do is annoy me
    so I have been sent here to destroy you
    and there's a million of us just like me
    who post like me, who just don't give a fuck like me
    who code like me, walk, talk and act like me
    and just might be the next best thing, but not quite me......

    I'm Bruce Perens, yes, I'm the real Perens
    all you other Bruce Perens' are just imitating
    so won't the real Bruce Perens please stand up,
    please stand up, please stand up
    cause I'm Bruce Perens, yes, I'm the real Perens
    all you other Bruce Perens' are just imitating
    so wont the real Bruce Perens please stand up,
    please stand up, please stand up

    I'm like a head trip to listen to
    cause I'm only givin you things
    you troll about with your friends inside you rabbit hole
    the only difference is I got the balls to say it
    in front of ya'll and I aint gotta be false or sugar coated at all
    I just get on the web and spit it
    and whether you like to admit it (riiip)
    I just shit it better than 90% you trollers out can
    then you wonder how can
    kids eat up these posts like gospel verse
    it's funny,cause at the rate I'm going when I'm thirty
    I'll be the only person in the chat rooms flirting
    cyberin with nurses when I'm jackin off to porno's
    and I'm jerkin' but this whole bag of viagra isn't working
    in every single person there's a bruce perens lurkin
    he could be workin at Micron Inc., spittin on your SDRAM
    or in the printer queue, flooding, writin I dont give a fuck
    with his windows down and his system up
    so will the real perens please stand up
    and click 1 of those fingers till you drag up
    and be proud to be outta your mind and outta control
    and 1 more time, loud as you can, how does it go? ...........

    I'm Bruce Perens, yes, I'm the real Perens
    all you other Bruce Perens' are just imitating
    so wont the real Bruce Perens please stand up,
    please stand up, please stand up
    cause I'm Bruce Perens, yes, I'm the real Perens
    all you other Bruce Perens' are just imitating
    so wont the real Bruce Perens please stand up,
    please stand up, please stand up

    I'm Bruce Perens, yes, I'm the real Perens
    all you other Bruce Perens' are just imitating
    so wont the real Bruce Perens please stand up,
    please stand up, please stand up
    cause I'm Bruce Perens, yes, I'm the real Perens
    all you other Bruce Perens' are just imitating
    so wont the real Bruce Perens please stand up,
    please stand up, please stand up

    haha guess it's a bruce perens in all of us........
    fuck it let's all stand up

  115. Nasreddin - background by Walter+Wart · · Score: 2

    Nasreddin was a Sufi. Supposedly, he was blessed - or cursed - by his shaykh with the highest possible state of enlightenment possible for a human being. But he could only communicate and teach it through jokes.

    Nasreddin's tomb is impressive. It has huge barred doors closed with thick iron chains. But it has no walls.

    --
    The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake