Slashdot Mirror


Using Your Computer to Repel Pests

circletimessquare writes "A Thai guy wrote a program that uses your computer speaker to repel mosquitoes, cockroaches, and rats! Just when you thought you heard it all before (pun intended for no good reason). " Thats nothing- CowboyNeal can repel all known lifeforms just by playing his massive collection of boy band MP3s.

409 comments

  1. Taco takes advantage of no -1s! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Thats nothing- CowboyNeal can repel all known lifeforms just by playing his massive collection of boy band MP3s.

    Good thing -1's aren't around anymore, cause they'd have a hayday with that comment, taco!!

  2. Does it work on pointy-headed bosses? by burgburgburg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:Does it work on pointy-headed bosses? by Scrab · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only at 7 hz, which is the resonant frequeancy of your backside. But that woiuld make a mess of your office.......

      --
      RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
    2. Re:Does it work on pointy-headed bosses? by RCO · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The mosquito freq. works for the blood suckers. The rat freq. is self explanitory. The cockroach freg is for the ones that make your skin crawl.

      --
      'And all the monkeys aren't in the zoo Every day you meet quite a few...'
    3. Re:Does it work on pointy-headed bosses? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Can it repel this "pest"? Bill Gates would like to know.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    4. Re:Does it work on pointy-headed bosses? by great_flaming_foo · · Score: 1

      Does it work on pointy-headed bosses?

      CowboyNeal's mp3s work very well on PHBs, but there is one catch. They also attract a previously unknown (at least to CmdrTaco) pest, <dramatic> The Teenage Fan Girl </dramatic>

    5. Re:Does it work on pointy-headed bosses? by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dunno,

      It's my hair that's pointy, not my head.

    6. Re:Does it work on pointy-headed bosses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it work on the wife?

    7. Re:Does it work on pointy-headed bosses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lamest. shit. ever.

      suck a cock LUNIX FAGS

    8. Re:Does it work on pointy-headed bosses? by fuzzyanus · · Score: 1

      bahaha..

  3. Works great, but...... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hate cleaning up all those broken dishes every morning.

    1. Re:Works great, but...... by brejc8 · · Score: 2

      This is what happens if you dont!

      Or you culd catch them and make them pay for their evil deeds

    2. Re:Works great, but...... by peterprior · · Score: 1

      whoa... that guys hair is just wrong... or scary.. or both

    3. Re:Works great, but...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody ordered a Microsoft Mouse, and the clerk didn't know that MS made mouses, so he found something that looked and smelled like Bill Gates, appearently.

    4. Re:Works great, but...... by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      Run a razor down the top of his head, and he'd look like Wolverine from the X-Men.

  4. TMI TMI TMI!!!!! by Emugamer · · Score: 1
    Thats nothing- CowboyNeal can repel all known lifeforms just by playing his massive collection of boy band MP3s.
    TO MUCH INFORMATION!!!!!
    Ever heard of oversharing ?
    1. Re:TMI TMI TMI!!!!! by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Y'know, it actually occurs to me that Pater (aka CowboyNeal) is actually a pretty damn cool guy to laugh with everybody else at the fun that gets poked at him.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:TMI TMI TMI!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your .sig:
      "An interesting view: T(H)GSB Apr 21-27"

      Seems a little outdated, eh?

    3. Re:TMI TMI TMI!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your sig: an interesting view, No, a tedious diatribe, yes, and yes outdated.

    4. Re:TMI TMI TMI!!!!! by SyniK · · Score: 1

      If the man truely has massive amounts of boy band MP3s, it's no laughing matter!

      You can't code to M'Bop!

      --
      -Tom
    5. Re:TMI TMI TMI!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you think GNU/Hurd is written?

  5. But what... by DomoKun · · Score: 0

    ...will repel CowboyNeal?

    1. Re:But what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coast Gaurd?

    2. Re:But what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right guard?

  6. Jokes coming? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Millions of DEBUG and WINDOWS jokes to follow...

    1. Re:Jokes coming? by Diamon · · Score: 2

      So would bugs in the program cause bugs in the house?

    2. Re:Jokes coming? by uncoveror · · Score: 2

      Maybe they could add this feature to Pest Patrol, My favorite anti hacker and spyware tool.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    3. Re:Jokes coming? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      All I have to do is bind Windows error events to fart noises. Nothing comes near.

  7. So My $1300.00 by Hayzeus · · Score: 1

    Mosquito Magnet is now obsolete?

    1. Re:So My $1300.00 by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but you can still get this very effective Eternal Life Device which uses magnets to MAKE YOU LIVE FOREVER.

    2. Re:So My $1300.00 by Hayzeus · · Score: 2, Funny

      They work, you know. I have one, and I'm not dead yet .

  8. Attract the mosquitoes by luugi · · Score: 1

    If this thing can repel them, I wonder if they have something that could be used to attract them somewhere else.

    --
    Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.
    1. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by evilempireinc · · Score: 1

      now wouldn't that be an evil computer virus... *slap* ow!

      --
      we can rebuild this sig. we have the technology
    2. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by bauble · · Score: 5, Funny

      If this thing can repel them, I wonder if they have something that could be used to attract them somewhere else.

      As most geeks probably realize, it's generally much easier to repel a given organism than it is to attract it.

    3. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by Defender2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That would make a nifty virus. When it infects a computer, it plays sound through the speakers to attract all sorts of critters. Since the victim can't hear it, they'll never know why.

      --
      ...I'll procrastinate tomorrow...
    4. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by GutterBunny · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's been done. My code has been attracting bugs for years.

      --
      managers...why god invented purgatory
    5. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nifty indeed. In a critter infested apartment complex, those running Linux would be pretty happy if every windows box in the building was infected with a pest attracting virus.

    6. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by opti6600 · · Score: 1

      Whoa, somebody here works for HP?

    7. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by Soko · · Score: 3, Funny

      If this thing can repel them, I wonder if they have something that could be used to attract them somewhere else.

      As most geeks probably realize, it's generally much easier to repel a given organism than it is to attract it.


      Except if that organism happens to be at the other end of the tech support phone line, asking where the "any" key is in Linux.

      *Bashes forehead on keyboard*

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    8. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by jeff67 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, right! All geeks know that leaving stale chips, pizza boxes, etc on the floor never attracts cockroaches, mice, or anything!

    9. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by Boatman · · Score: 1

      managers...*how* God invented purgatory.

      --
      --Just the place for a snark!
    10. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by Hassan79 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you are living in a region where Malaria occurs, you may have the first computer virus that infects you with a real disease!.

      --

      Don't drink and su! antidisestablishmentariazationally
    11. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by Dalcius · · Score: 2, Funny

      If this thing can repel them, I wonder if they have something that could be used to attract them somewhere else.

      Computer: Attention! This is the RIAA! We have been monitoring your downloading activities and will be flooding you off the internet.

      Cracker: Tsk.

      Later that day:
      "In other news today, the RIAA was swarmed with thousands of hungry female mosquitos. Hilary Rosen, between slapping and scratching, said, 'Well, that's 10 minutes those kids weren't downloading music. Another victory for the RIAA!'"

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    12. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by evil+superstar · · Score: 1

      my mosquitos come to the light of my monitor... my father does sometimes too, but only when he sees booby-like light patterns coming from it.

    13. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Life in prison!!

    14. Re:Attract the mosquitoes by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20020728& mode=classic

      See above link for related fun. ;-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  9. Download by Betelgeuse · · Score: 5, Informative

    The software program they talk about can be found on (an almost all Thai) web site here.

    --
    I couldn't tell if you were experimenting with poor-man's cryogenics or looking for the orange sherbet.
    1. Re:Download by 10+Speed · · Score: 1

      'VERY VERY Important Note'
      that much is in English but the note itself is in Thai, leaving me more that a little worried about installing this (even if I could find the download link)

      back to the thai lessons I guess.

    2. Re:Download by Dahan · · Score: 2
      The wery wery important node says something about after you download and RUN the program, you might get a POP-UP with some kind of ERROR message in it. But after you dismiss that, if you get something that looks like a radar in your Taskbar, the program is working without any problems.

      Sounds pretty cheesy to me :)

    3. Re:Download by alnielsen · · Score: 1

      ZDNet Downloads (hotfiles.com) has "Anti-Mosquito" software.
      http://downloads-zdnet.com.com/3000-2056-8228265 .h tml?tag=lst-0-1

    4. Re:Download by 10+Speed · · Score: 1

      kop kun kraab (excuse the romanisation)

  10. hmm... by questionlp · · Score: 2, Funny

    About a RAID array of say 14-15 15K RPM SCSI hard drives?

    1. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "About a RAID array of say 14-15 15K RPM SCSI hard drives?"

      Well, I cant see that working.. unless you want to repel humans thats is :)

    2. Re:hmm... by questionlp · · Score: 1

      I can't hear a single word you say... can you repeat that again? :)

      I wouldn't mind repelling the users away from my cube or the server room. hehe.

  11. Been there, done that... by Nethergoat · · Score: 1

    All I have to do is crank up some Antonio Carlos Jobim and my brother mysteriously disappears.
    Now that's what I call a real pest repellent

  12. Sounds like a good plugin... by CommieLib · · Score: 1

    for a handheld.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  13. Forget.. by iONiUM · · Score: 2

    Off! I'll just bring my laptop to the great outdoors... with a wireless net connection you could download different types of repellent too, maybe ones for bees and annoying campers who won't leave you alone.

    1. Re:Forget.. by Mike+the+Mac+Geek · · Score: 2

      I wish I could play an MP3 that would get rid of campers. Fuckin' Campers.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- ---- The man, the myth, the something or other.
    2. Re:Forget.. by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you could borrow something from Cowbow Neils collection, that might do the trick!

    3. Re:Forget.. by idontneedanickname · · Score: 2, Funny

      the repelent against campers that won't leave you alone: boy band mp3's WARNING: Do not use near american teens, may have oposite effect. (Disclaimer: I cannot be help responsible for any damages caused (mental or other)

    4. Re:Forget.. by grazzy · · Score: 1

      w00t w00t, damp campers! get out of my spawn position!!

      *get that highpitched noice
      *turn up gamevoice
      *engage!!

      [Thai]Coder oblitterated 12 campers**

    5. Re:Forget.. by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 2, Funny

      Camper Repellant... (tm) (Please note. This has only been tested at Renaissance Faires, ergo your milage may vary)
      1) Set up your site wherever you can find a nearby picnic table. It will soon not matter how many *other* people are near it.
      2) Place a set of bagpipes on the picnic table. Followed by a copy of "Bagpipes for beginners".
      3) In approx. 10 minutes, you will be the ONLY sentient life form in about a 1 mile radius.
      4) Enjoy your camping in peace!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
  14. uhm by Dizzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Some users of the mosquito-repelling program have reported headaches after long periods spent in front of a computer emitting the bug-repelling high-pitched whine."

    No comment on whether these users got the same headaches just by sitting in front of the computer for hours at a time without the program running?

    1. Re:uhm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No comment on wether the users cause headaches when talking to people around them.

  15. Engineering Question by delphin42 · · Score: 2

    Why are speakers designed to emit sound at frequencies undectable by humans in the first place? I can't imagine that the designers of computer speakers had these types of applications in mind. Does the program work with any speakers, and do some speakers offer better high frequency performance than others?

    --
    -- Adam
    1. Re:Engineering Question by Zone5 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not so much that they're designed to emit sounds humans can't hear, as it is that they can't really be designed *NOT* to emit sounds humans can't hear.

      No matter what you do, you're going to be producing harmonics that may well lie outside the human range of hearing, and what with materials being imperfect, you could never perfectly limit the sound emissions to the normal human-audible range no matter how hard you tried. Even if you wanted to (and why?), there'd be the small matter of cost-effectiveness.

      Paying an extra $500 per speaker just so your dog doesn't get to hear something you can't isn't really a good investment.

      --
      "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
    2. Re:Engineering Question by Kosmatos · · Score: 1

      This is a new trend in the high-end audio world... The idea is that these higher frequencies (say, between 20 to 100Khz) while not directly audible to humans, supposedly affect the lower (audible) frequencies. Now that we have the digital mediums (SACD and DVD-Audio) that can store these higher frequencies, some loudspeaker manufacturers are producing speakers which can reproduct them.

      I'm just the messenger...

      --
      I'm your huckleberry
    3. Re:Engineering Question by sasami · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More to the point, you want the frequency-response curve of the speaker to be flat as possible throughout the range of human hearing. That means the dropoff at the end of the curve has to be outside the range of human hearing.

      --
      Dum de dum.

      --
      Freedom is not the license to do what we like, it is the power to do what we ought.
    4. Re:Engineering Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has been pointed out, filtering out those frequencies is just expense and bother. Additionally, on really good speakers, to get a "flat" response in the range normally heard by humans (20 Hz to 20 kHz), the easiest way to do it is to extend the bands to even higher out-of-range frequencies so that the -3 dB point is out beyond 20 kHz.

    5. Re:Engineering Question by dohcvtec · · Score: 1

      Certainly, speakers (especially computer speakers) vary greatly in their ability to produce ultrasonic sounds. Speakers with a single full-range cone driver (quite common) will be very limited, while 2-way or 3-way speakers, usually with a 1/2"-1" dome tweeter, will be more adept at producing ultrasonic sound. My main concern is that with low quality speakers, in order to get a high enough level of the ultrasonic sound, the audible range might need to be excessively loud. In regard to the article's mention of headaches, I'm not surprised. Most speakers would likely produce subharmonics of the ultrasonic frequencies, due to resonance/distortion. In other words, if the main frequency is e.g. 40KHz, a subharmonic of e.g. 20KHz may be emitted, which is just at or above human audible frequencies and may be rather annoying.

      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    6. Re:Engineering Question by dohcvtec · · Score: 1

      Actually, they've been around for a long time. Titanium dome tweeters have typically had an extended ultrasonic frequency range, with resonances in the (IIRC) 50KHz range. Some people say that titanium domes have a "harsh" sound, and they cite this as the reason. A lot of work has been done with crossovers to combat these resonances - even though they are well above accepted human audibility, they are such huge spikes that they can be problematic.

      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    7. Re:Engineering Question by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* No matter what you do, you're going to be producing harmonics that may well lie outside the human range of hearing, and what with materials being imperfect, you could never perfectly limit the sound emissions to the normal human-audible range no matter how hard you tried. *)

      Yes, but wouldn't the imperfections be *different* per speaker?

      The article made it sound like it takes different patterns or frequencies of sounds for different critters. If they are that picky, then the variation (imperfections) in each speaker may be ruin the customization.

      Manufactures are likely to only test for the human range, ignoring problems outside of that. That is how cheapskates cut corners.

    8. Re:Engineering Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Myth!

      Yes, while there can be high frequency harmonics in audio that can then interact (a 50 kHz tone and a 45 kHz tone interact to produce a difference tone at 5 kHz, well within the audible range), they are at so low levels that they barely pass through the amplifiers, much less the speakers (consider the amount of energy it takes to make the mass of a speaker diaphram move at 50 kHz at a reasonable SPL)... Most speakers start to roll off around 15-16 kHz, and even the flattest ones are usually down 3 dB by 20 kHz (incidentally, because it's logarythmic, -3 dB=1/2 power).

      The REAL reason for needing higher sampling rates - 88.2 kHz, 96 kHz, 192 kHz, etc. - is to get around aliasing... Aliasing is non-harmonic distortion that occurs when you pass tones through an A-D converter that are higher than 1/2 the sampling rate (this is known as the Nyquist Frequency). Due to the aliasing, they modulate back down into the audio band.
      To get around this, the Redbook standard for CD audio calls for filtering on the input A/D conversion to be down -40 dB at 22.05 kHz... still, though, that produces some aliasing (that's why they now use oversampling).
      However, the brick-wall filter you need to drop down 40 dB at 22.05 kHz but still be reasonably flat at 20 kHz causes phase distortion well down to 8 kHz or lower.
      Increasing the sampling rate to one of those higher ones lets you make a _much_ gentler filter, and drastically reduces the phase distortion. Add oversampling to that, and you get rid of all or almost all of your aliasing problems.

      -Dan, Sound Engineer, and member of the Audio Engineering Society of America

    9. Re:Engineering Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manufactures are likely to only test for the human range, ignoring problems outside of that. That is how cheapskates cut corners.

      If it's fine for the human range of hearing, why would that be cutting corners? Sounds like being smart. Anything else seems like a waste of money.

    10. Re:Engineering Question by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* If it's fine for the human range of hearing, why would that be cutting corners? Sounds like being smart. Anything else seems like a waste of money. *)

      Problems or inconsistencies in outside ranges may indicate deeper problems. A high-quality manufacturer would chuck the suspected ones also (or resell them to cheaper vendors).

    11. Re:Engineering Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Remember who wrote Emacs, don't you? That's right. It was your friend and mine Richard Stallman. He is a very brilliant man.

      Stallman is a programmer, but not just any programmer. Probably more than anyone else, he created the foundation for a software genre--and a movement--that is one of the last buttresses against the monopolists who want to capture perfect control of the technology business and the money that flows through it.

      His creation became known as 'free software,' the notion that users of computers need and deserve the ability to freely use and modify the crucial programs that make these machines work. Proprietary software abridges those freedoms.

      Stallman's GNU project helped spark a Finnish software genius, Linus Torvalds, to create a crucial piece, the crucial component, of what is now called the Linux operating system. Stallman calls it GNU/Linux. He has a point.

  16. Windows bugs by luugi · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I wonder what is going to happen when you run this thing on a MS Windows system.

    --
    Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.
    1. Re:Windows bugs by stuuf · · Score: 2, Funny

      If its a real pest repellant, it will disable Windows Update and stop Internet Explorer from wanting to be a default browser, and de-integrate media player

      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    2. Re:Windows bugs by gorac · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      being that windows contains so many bugs, I think it will repel windows

    3. Re:Windows bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it installs you favorite *nix os

    4. Re:Windows bugs by tsa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I replied to a Linux 'joke', so I have to reply to this one too --- Ha ha ha. NOT funny! Take your offtopic jokes elsewhere please.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    5. Re:Windows bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bit me

    6. Re:Windows bugs by luugi · · Score: 1

      What's so offtopic about it. It's about bugs and it's about computer. It's just a joke! That's what the funny moderation is for.

      If you don't find it funny just go to the next comment. Instead of waisting your time writing a reply.

      --
      Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.
    7. Re:Windows bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't gotten any +1: Funny mods yet, have you?

      I submit therfore that it is not in fact funny at all, and you should report to your local service center to have your humor module replaced.

  17. 2 meters... by perrin5 · · Score: 1

    Hrmm, the thing only works two meters from the "computer" which I assume means the speakers. Oh well. In the meantime, at least I won't get malaria (or west Nile Virus here in the states)

    My favorite qoute from the article:
    "Saranyou told the paper the latest version of the pest controller will not annoy dogs or risk causing headaches because the frequencies that annoy rats and cockroaches are undetectable by human or canine ears. "

    *sigh* and here I thought they were talking about politicians.

    --
    hmmmm?
    1. Re:2 meters... by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      Hrmm, the thing only works two meters from the "computer" which I assume means the speakers. Oh well. In the meantime, at least I won't get malaria (or west Nile Virus here in the states)

      Yes, but it you have a 4.1 or 5.1 speaker system, you can position the speakers nearly two meters away from you, which basically gives you an area with a 4 meter radius. That's a significant amount of room. I wonder what kind of range you can get from turning up the volume?

  18. Repelling Rats by EatHam · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have a great device that I use to repel rats. It's called a house.

  19. Shithead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a goddamn cocksucker, you know that?

    Fuck, I've seen some obvious karma whoring, but you take the cake, the stripper inside, and the whole fucking table it's sitting on.

  20. Mandatory congress joke. by tcd004 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cockroaches, Blood Suckers, and Rats!?!

    Better not fire up that baby in congress!

    Yeah, I know it's lame, but this is funnier.

    tcd004

  21. And where do mosquitoes, cockroaches and rats go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They go to your neighbor's place, prompting your neighbor to install repelling software too. Looks like a great opportunity for a commercial product.

  22. High Frequencies by Flaming+Foobar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The electronic mosquito repellents use ultrasonic sound, i.e. sound that is so high that it can't be heard by humans. Basically, they emit similar sounds as the natural enemies of mosquitos. I really wonder how well such sounds can be reproduced using regular computer speakers that can barely reproduce the frequencies we hear.

    - FF

    --
    while true;do echo -e -n "\033[s\n\033[u\134_\033[B";done
    1. Re:High Frequencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      As a PhD student in animal behavior, stories like this really irk me.

      Although bats do emit ultrasound, only a few species of moths (the Noctuid moths) actually have the capacity to hear and respond to bat calls. They typically fold in their wings and just fall to the ground.

      Mosquitos have no such hearing capacity. Repeated studies by scientists and the FTC have demonstrated that the ultrasonic mosquito repellant systems fail to work as promised. Those devices, and the program described above, may be fun to tinker with, but they cannot help you.

    2. Re:High Frequencies by Flaming+Foobar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mosquitos have no such hearing capacity

      A simple Google search found this at Earthlife.net: Sound is very important to mosquitos for a number of reasons one of these is the location of mates. The antennae of male mosquitoes are sensitive to the sounds created by the beating wings of females of the same species. Because females are usually larger than the males, the wings of males and females beat at different frequencies. This makes it possible for males to distinguish females from males based on the sound of the beating wings and helps in the detection of females of the right species

      So they do hear high sounds (and probably very faint sounds, too), though there is no mention of them actually recognizing their enemies from sound. There are lots of those electronic gadgets available, though.

      - FF

      --
      while true;do echo -e -n "\033[s\n\033[u\134_\033[B";done
    3. Re:High Frequencies by SeanWithoutPants · · Score: 1

      A number of months ago my mother purchased one of those mini mosquito repellent devices which she uses while she walks her dog. There are two settings in it; a clicking sound, and a high pitched sound. Everbody can hear the clicking sound, but out of everybody I've showed, I'm th eonly one who can hear the high pitched sound. Am I a rare mosquito-human hybrid that is set to take over the world...or are some people simply more susceptible to these high frequencies?


      fyi, I can hear it (and very often find it) the moment I enter a room , regardless of where it is.

      Regards

    4. Re:High Frequencies by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "The electronic mosquito repellents use ultrasonic sound, i.e. sound that is so high that it can't be heard by humans. Basically, they emit similar sounds as the natural enemies of mosquitos. I really wonder how well such sounds can be reproduced using regular computer speakers that can barely reproduce the frequencies we hear."

      I've read Consumer Reports Magazine articles about these things. Supposedly they emit the sound of a dragonfly which is the mosquito's natural enemy. According to the TV ads, the devices are "Tested by the US Army" but not endorsed. According to the Consumer Reports article, the things don't work worth sh~t and you're better off using regular citronella(sp?) based insect repellents.

      Maybe this thai software has something the commerical devices don't?

    5. Re:High Frequencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admit it, you're just looking for an excuse to justify the fact you like to suck on any human you walk by... you pervert!

    6. Re:High Frequencies by g()()ber · · Score: 1

      Some people can hear higher pitched noises than others. Computer monitors set at a 60Hz refresh, dying florescent bulbs, and many projecters (especially those three lense Barcos) drive me nuts. My grandmother bought one of those insect repellant things for her garden. My brothers and I could all hear it. Most people could not. (The bugs didn't seem to mind) IIRC women and younger people are more likely to be able to hear higher pitched sound.

      --
      I am so one thousand three hundred and thirty seven!
    7. Re:High Frequencies by kc0dby · · Score: 2

      Actually, if you've ever had a mosquito buzzing around your head for an extended period of time, (I'm not sure if it was male or female, I tend to use lethal force on these creatures without lifting up its leg to check its gender) you would find that not only is the sound audible, but it isn't really near the top of our range either.

      --
      I apparently forgot that sig != uptime...
    8. Re:High Frequencies by j-beda · · Score: 2
      I think that studies have also shown that citronella based repellents are also pretty shitty. Basically the most effective thing is DEET based, and DEET can be a pretty nasty chemical. Citronella smells good though...

      I seem to recall that a research group puts a bunch of voulenteers out in the woods need Winnipeg each year coated in various products and using various candles, sound devices, and other such products. Each year they find pretty much the same thing - DEET repells them, thick coatings (bear grease, hand soap, etc.) forms a physical barrier that prevents bites, and pretty much everything else does diddley squat.

      I do recall that Discover once reported that mosquitos prefer pigs to humans, so keeping one of them around as a pet might be effective. Sleep with your pig and prevent malaria/west nile virus infections!

    9. Re:High Frequencies by kc0dby · · Score: 1

      Computer monitors set at a 60Hz refresh, dying
      Interesting. I was always one of the few people I knew who could hear when something electrical was on the fritz, but I've never noticed anything with monitors other than the ever constant 'whine' any CRT makes. I would imagine that the 60Hz refresh rate isn't what you're hearing, but the corresponding horizontal refresh rate that goes with it. That would be a higher frequency. After accidently applying 60Hz AC to a few items, anything about that frequency just makes my skin crawl. Haven't heard it out of a monitor yet...

      --
      I apparently forgot that sig != uptime...
    10. Re:High Frequencies by topham · · Score: 2

      Unfortunatly sleeping with a pig might increase the chance of influenza...

    11. Re:High Frequencies by one9nine · · Score: 3, Funny

      So does this mean if your speakers emit the wrong frequency, instead of repeling those bastards, you will get hundreds mosquitos trying to hump your speakers?

      Mini-Me, stop humping the laser. Why don't you and the frickin laser get a room.

    12. Re:High Frequencies by tg_schlacht · · Score: 1

      Avon Skin-So-Soft is a good mosquito repellent (most likely due to the mineral oil.) Probably any thing else with a similar amount of mineral oil would be as effective. Mosquitos will get close to you but the second they contact you (and the oil) they pull away, probably to avoid being trapped.

    13. Re:High Frequencies by maetenloch · · Score: 1

      Am I a rare mosquito-human hybrid that is set to take over the world...

      Yep, from now on you're known as MosquitoBoy. Now you need a costume to match your superpowers.

    14. Re:High Frequencies by cs668 · · Score: 1

      Iff it is trying to get you it is female. Only the girls are blood-suckers.

    15. Re:High Frequencies by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      aren't misqutoes attracted to the co2 produced by humans? wouldn't a block of dry ice, and a nice, warm bloody steak next to it, about 30 feet from where you're sitting/area of activity be the best solution?

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    16. Re:High Frequencies by g()()ber · · Score: 1

      I can't hear all monitors at 60Hz, but all the ones I can hear have been at 60Hz. I've noticed it especially from Trinitron (use them at work) and older Dell monitors (own one, and at work). I have spent a lot of time in a lab with about 60 Apple monitors, and have never noticed it from any of them. Not a big problem until my teachers ask why i'm plugging my ears during their lecture. . .

      --
      I am so one thousand three hundred and thirty seven!
    17. Re:High Frequencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is so true.

    18. Re:High Frequencies by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Someone gift me one of the variable-setting sonic repellers. I can hear it quite plainly even at the high frequency "flying bugs" setting; at the "rodent" setting, *anyone* could hear it.... for miles around!!! If it repels anything, it's because it gives 'em a resounding ear-ache.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    19. Re:High Frequencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The link you cite certainly looks authoritative, but I'm pretty sure it is factually wrong on (at least) one point: female mosquitos, at least the full grown ones, are considerably smaller than males -- the females are maybe 1-1.5cm long, whereas the males have torsos 3 to 4 times that length. At least that's what I remember from many years of summer camp...

      -Jon

    20. Re:High Frequencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would suggest that you chain a Negro out in the backyard. That way
      he (it?) can serve a useful purpose as skeeter bait. I don't like colored people anyway.

    21. Re:High Frequencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sleep with your pig and prevent malaria/west nile virus infections!

      Again, we find that Coyboy Kneel is the solution to our problem!

  23. one for the moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Thats nothing- CowboyNeal can repel all known lifeforms just by playing his massive collection of boy band MP3s.

    naa. C0wb0yKn33l kan repel all lifeforms with his dirty GNU/hippie reek of gay and lardassness

  24. I wish I knew Thai by Thai-Pan · · Score: 1

    If only I understood Thai, so I could set Anti-Mal to Anti-CowboyNeal mode.

    1. Re:I wish I knew Thai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only you understood funny, so that things like this wouldn't happen.

  25. Hey - stop picking on CowboyNeal! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    We can do it in the polls, but you, his boss -- no fair! Man, if I were CowboyNeal, I'd be thinking of talking to the Labor Commissioner about workplace harassment.

    1. Re:Hey - stop picking on CowboyNeal! by slothbait · · Score: 2

      Ahh we all love Neal.

    2. Re:Hey - stop picking on CowboyNeal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you do, panama red. Especially if you throw a "to" in there.

  26. You cant scare rats away! by brejc8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I scared rats away then who would power my computer?

    1. Re:You cant scare rats away! by k2enemy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      just put the speaker behind him and he'll run faster!
      actaully it would be interesting to do an experiment where the rat powers the speaker. i wonder if he would try to run faster or if he would "get it" and stop running.

    2. Re:You cant scare rats away! by brejc8 · · Score: 2

      Actually the original setup had the board attached to a speaker.
      It would make horrible high pitched noises because it was running in a software loop.
      I couldnt be bothered to complete the version which would sing daisy daisy. Manybe ill get an undergrad to do it.

    3. Re:You cant scare rats away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to hand it to you. That is true a Geekwork project. The icing on the cake is when you brag to your date that you reduce your power bill by using the rats outside of your apartment to power your widgets. If she does not find geekiness attractive (there are a handful of those kind of girls, BTW), then you will have filtered her out right then and there.

  27. Flipside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget Off! I'll just bring my laptop to the great outdoors...

    While it repels mosquitoes, it remains untested regarding bears.

    1. Re:Flipside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, most of the people here would die if they had to really camp... Especially in northern Ontario, where the powers that be cancelled the bear hunt, so there's not enough food for too many bears.

  28. Coming soon... by DDX_2002 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Saranyou told the paper the latest version of the pest controller will not annoy dogs or risk causing headaches
    Windoze XP SP967 - now guaranteed not to cause your ears to bleed*! Safe** for use near pets and small children!
    *tested in a controlled laboratory environment on a random sampling of M$ contract workers - YMMV
    ** M$ makes no warranty express or implied about the effects of the product on actual users of the software. Some users have reported headaches, extreme nausea and depression after using XP. Use only as direted. Unauthorized copies of XP may cause blindness or instant death - you have been warned.
    --
    MHO. YMMV. Any resemblance between this post and real persons, or reality in general, was accidental.
  29. How gullible are you people by sam_handelman · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to a colleague at Rutgers:
    Hand-held electronic devices that rely on high-frequency sound to repel mosquitoes have become surprisingly popular in recent years .... Scientific studies have repeatedly shown that electronic mosquito repellers do not prevent host seeking mosquitoes from biting. In most cases, the claims made by distributors border on fraud.

    While your downloading this software, if you buy a NYC landmark from me, I'll throw in a set of Mr. Chiu's immortality rings at no extra charge!

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, don't knock the immortality rings! They really work :P

      -A mind is like a parachute: It works best open

    2. Re:How gullible are you people by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Scientific studies have repeatedly shown that electronic mosquito repellers do not prevent host seeking mosquitoes from biting. In most cases, the claims made by distributors border on fraud.

      What about all the other pests? (cockroaches, rats, etc.)

    3. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Chiu's immortality rings DO work!
      I'm wearing them right now and I haven't died yet!
      So there.....hmmmm, what's that funny noi####
      thud

    4. Re:How gullible are you people by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Right!
      Sound dosen't deter mosquito's. So some of this seems bogus to me. DEET works though.
      Here is a link that says basicly the same thing.

      http://www.acponline.org/journals/annals/01jun98 /m osquito.htm

    5. Re:How gullible are you people by Osiris+Ani · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hey, I have one of those, and I haven't been bitten by a single mosquito while wearing it this summer.

      Then again, I also have yet to be bitten by a bear, shark, or vampire while using the device... and come to think of it, it even seems to keep those pesky meteorites at bay. Bonus!

    6. Re:How gullible are you people by garcia · · Score: 1

      well, they may not work for mosquitoes but the little dog collar ones work well for all other types of pests (fleas/ticks/etc).

      My dog (back in the day) used to chew herself raw every summer. We tried the large collars, the shampoos, the regular dog/flea/tick collars, nothing.

      My grandmother (of all people) was watching HSN (of course) and ordered these electronic dog collars that were to repel pests. Vet said it would never work. She wore that thing until she died. Never chewed again.

      Maybe it is bullshit for mosquitoes but it does apparently work for other critters.

    7. Re:How gullible are you people by j-beda · · Score: 3, Informative
      Hey, that's a good link. Here it is clickable:

      http://www.acponline.org/journals/annals/01jun98/m osquito.htm.

    8. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She wore that thing until she died. Never chewed again.

      Did you leave out the part about how right after you put it on her, she dropped dead? And that's why she "wore that thing until she died. Never chewed again.".... ok, jes bustin' yer chops...

    9. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, I also have yet to be bitten by a bear, shark, or vampire while using the device... and come to think of it, it even seems to keep those pesky meteorites at bay. Bonus!

      Betcha you have not had a date either while wearing your little Geek Badge, so it works on females too.

    10. Re:How gullible are you people by mobets · · Score: 1

      I heard about this a while back, except it was a radio station braudcasting it. Basicaly, most bites are from pregnate females, so if you play the male mating call, the pregnate females stay away.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    11. Re:How gullible are you people by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      And the non-pregnant randy females come and hump your speakers.

    12. Re:How gullible are you people by nathanm · · Score: 2

      No kidding! If it actually worked, people would be downloading it on every computer here in Minnesota, where our state bird is the mosquito (a little MN humor).

      There was a recent series of articles in the St Paul Pioneer Press about mosquitoes, including what works & doesn't work against them. The most effective are the new propane powered traps, but they cost a few $100. DEET based bug repellant works. Citronella candles work somewhat, but only for a very small area.

      For more info, check out the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (yes, we're that serious about mosquitoes).

    13. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right like anyone posting anonymously to slashdot gets any. Whoops.

    14. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't knock the immortality rings! They really work :P

      I'm living proof. I haven't died yet!

    15. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how exactly did the vet wearing the sound collar help the dog with ticks?

    16. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but if you just died.... then how did 'submit' get pressed? wah!

    17. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he was talking about the grandma.

    18. Re:How gullible are you people by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Correction, the Minn. State Bird is the *twin-engine* mosquito.... (I used to live there, and how fondly I recall being carried off as a midnight snack :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    19. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe he fell on it? :)

    20. Re:How gullible are you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't it the mosquito?

  30. Windows Only Version by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

    I download it ! It's only an Windows version. I wonder to know if Windows will work again without bug !
    Hope they will put an Linux version soon !

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    1. Re:Windows Only Version by tsa · · Score: 1

      Does it run with WINE under Linux?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:Windows Only Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need the windows version more because windows has got more bugs than linux

  31. Darwin's Revenge by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Such a trick may only work for so long. Eventually bugs and pests will evolve a tolerance to it. Being that bugs reproduce pretty quickly, it may only take a few years before it is ineffective I would guess.

    Then again, if there is nothing to eat there, and most bugs are just accidental interlopers, evolution may not do much.

    IOW, if you are a slob (like most slashdotters), then Darwin will win.

    1. Re:Darwin's Revenge by Etcetera · · Score: 5, Funny

      Such a trick may only work for so long. Eventually bugs and pests will evolve a tolerance to it. Being that bugs reproduce pretty quickly, it may only take a few years before it is ineffective I would guess.

      That's the joy of a software solution -- it can keep up with evolution.

      Download Bug Repellant 2004 - now combats Roach 1.1 and Ant 2.0

      (FWIW, products like these have been out for some time and still seem to work effectivly. They're *repellants*, not killers. The only place a large-than normal tolerance would develop and grow/multiply is among roaches that decided to live within the range of the repellant.)

    2. Re:Darwin's Revenge by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* That's the joy of a software solution -- it can keep up with evolution *)

      I suppose you are right to some extent. The result, however, may just be deaf bugs. Or perhaps bugs that are not annoyed by *any* sound. For example, there may be logic in them that tells them to steer clear of unrecognized sounds. A mutation or two could simply short-curcuit that sequence so that a given bug does not run from odd sound, regardless of what it is.

      (Unless evolution has poor factoring, and there is a different logic path for each frequency and/or sound pattern. 2/3 of all programmers would use copy-and-paste instead of parameterizing such, so perhaps evolution is just as sloppy. Wasted DNA does not seem to bother evolution that much. Duplicate code does not seem to bother PHB's either, and the dumb programmers don't mind changing the same code pattern in 100 different spots.)

    3. Re:Darwin's Revenge by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is a good point. Only mosquitoes born with no adversion to the high frequencies would feed on people and they would reproduce like mad, devolping a thirst for human blood at the same time. Then, after the sensitive mosquitoes starve, the super race of mosquitoes would conquer the world. Mwhaahahahah. Where can I get one?

      oh yeah. Didn't the government already accomplish something along these lines with there attempt to kill fire ants?

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    4. Re:Darwin's Revenge by T3kno · · Score: 2

      Please stop confusing evolution with adaptation.

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    5. Re:Darwin's Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Please stop confusing evolution with adaptation.

      Adaptation is still evolution. If you don't believe this for whatever reason (e.g. religion), stop trying to foist your views on everyone else.

      -a

    6. Re:Darwin's Revenge by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

      FWIW, products like these have been out for some time and still seem to work effectivly. They're *repellants*, not killers.

      Exactly.
      If they actually work properly as repellents, then the insects wouldn't be around long enough to micro-evolve a tolerance for the thing they're avoiding.

      S

    7. Re:Darwin's Revenge by davidj0228 · · Score: 0

      only problem is that mosquitos dont eat blood, the females use the blood to get protein for development of eggs, they actually eat nectar or some other shit that comes from a plant. and mosquitos dont need to bite humans, blood from most any warm-blooded animal will do.

    8. Re:Darwin's Revenge by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Adaptation, to my understanding, is learning within a single generation. Evolution is the passing on of beneficial traits through the generations, by means of natural selection. Mosquitoes probably aren't going to learn that "hey, that high-pitched whine isn't a predator" since their avoidance mechanism is most likely a genetic instinct. Hence, the original poster was probably on target when he used the term "evolution" and not "adaptation". And whoever the AC was that replied to this, don't assume things...there's no reason to believe that he was trying to make a religious statement.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    9. Re:Darwin's Revenge by j-beda · · Score: 2
      FWIW, products like these have been out for some time and still seem to work effectivly.

      Or rather, they still work as well as they always did, which seems to be not at all.

    10. Re:Darwin's Revenge by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Such a trick may only work for so long. Eventually bugs and pests will evolve a tolerance to it. Being that bugs reproduce pretty quickly, it may only take a few years before it is ineffective I would guess.

      Yeah, maybe, but not necessarily. Look at India's "Neem" tree. It's been around millions of years (or whatever) and bugs still can't stand the chemical cocktail it emits.

      If the sound repellant, acts on a part of the mosquito that is low level enough, ie. intrinsic to it's existence, then it probably won't evolve to counteract it.

      We'll just have to wait and see.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    11. Re:Darwin's Revenge by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2

      This may actually work the other way around. Those creatures which are sensitive to it have a greater chance of survival -- they won't be swatted.

      I suppose the real question is whether or not the evolutionary advantage goes to the creatures which risk being swatted to suck blood from humans.

    12. Re:Darwin's Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOTE: this is assuming that evolution is true, many in the moral community do not make this assumption.

    13. Re:Darwin's Revenge by Kynde · · Score: 2

      FWIW, products like these have been out for some time and still seem to work effectivly. They're *repellants*, not killers.

      Show me one study, one reference or one non-hoopla article that shows that high frequency sound can act as mosquito repellant.

      Even the mosquito zappers (the ones with the blue light that electrocute mosquitos) are deemed ineffective by the scientific consortium. One study for example showed only 0.13% of the insects killed by the zapper to be female mosquitos (the ones that actually sting us).

      And don't come telling me there's a lot of this-and-that-and-grandma-says knowledge out there about mosquitos that science is not aware of. I'd say about the same amount as for curing cancer.
      Because there's quite a bit of pressure out there for finding proper repellants. Not because of the nasty itch they give you, but for the viral diseases they carry.

      "According to reports from the World Health Organization, causes as many as 3 000 000 deaths annually."

      Having read the article mention in an earlier post (http://www.acponline.org/journals/annals/01jun98/ m osquito.htm) I'd say the whole post is just a big hooopla.

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    14. Re:Darwin's Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "moral community"?

      Euphimism for people that choose to remain ignorant as they base their self-acceptance on a belief system aquired during childhood.

      Muhahahah!!

    15. Re:Darwin's Revenge by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      Actually, it wouldn't be that the roaches decide "let's try living here and we'll grow immune to it in a few years," it's more like a "deaf" roach (or couple) think, "noise? what annoying noise?" and successfully breed.

      Are your parents more likely to have poor hearing because they live next to high-traffic railroad tracks? Or more likely to live next to high-traffic railroad tracks because they have poor hearing? ;)

  32. Almost... by tomcio.s · · Score: 0

    makes me want to plug my PC speaker back in...

    No, wait, I am indoors. No need for that.

    But seriously, WTH would you need a cockroach repellant for? Chances are if you got roaches, you will just drive them deeper into your kitchen. But your computer will be roach free!

    Damn, some inventions are pointless.

  33. Impossible by FeltTip · · Score: 1

    A small computer speaker is incapable of emitting the frequencies required to repel those animals. Humans can hear from 20hz to 20khz. The speaker in your box can only emit sounds well within that range -- far too low to bother dogs, let alone repel rodents and insects.

    CNN has been had.

    --

    ....... rm -rf microsoft ........

    1. Re:Impossible by funky+womble · · Score: 1

      The zip comes with a jpeg showing a little piezo emitter connected up to a plug to fit into a soundcard output.

    2. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us actually have nice speakers connected to our machines and without bandpass limiting circuitry speakers can emit any sound frequency at which its electromagnet is capable of vibrating the diaphragm.

    3. Re:Impossible by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      which is usually not much more than the human hearing range. And passing really high frequencies to speakers tends to make them rip themselves apart. Plus if you are using a soundcard, that is a limitation already. It will most likely have a filter on it. Plus you can only get so high of a frequency with 48Khz sampling. I'm not sure what the typical limitation of a PC speaker circuit is, but they might be capable of going higher. Of course a piezo buzzer would be the proper way to produce high frequency tones. You should be able to connect one to the PC speaker output easily enough.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  34. What about my monitor by qurob · · Score: 2, Funny


    It makes this annoying, high pitched noise in certain video modes, when I'm trying to play MAME games. I know it makes the dog jump up and get the hell out of the living room.

    1. Re:What about my monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horizontal Synchrnoization circuit complaining about running the monitor at low resolution.

      Dogs hate it.

      Too bad mame wont' let you run at say 2x horizontal and 2x vertical resolution for old old games.

      nester, znes, snes may let you do that

  35. /. virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wanna bet this bugware is actually a virus. And /. is the host...

  36. How about something a bit more useful? by Acetylene5 · · Score: 1

    I can deal with bugs. I'm waiting for someone to come out with a program that will repell my boss!

    --
    ---- "Physics is like sex: It has a practical use, but that's not why we do it." -- Richard Feyneman
    1. Re:How about something a bit more useful? by Tadrith · · Score: 2

      Personally, I just shut my door and put on some nice programming music - Marilyn Manson.

      Not only repels my boss, but the entirety of our company from my room!

    2. Re:How about something a bit more useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it repels everyone's respect for you as well. Kudos!

    3. Re:How about something a bit more useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually they grow up (or find better music...) and realize how much Marylin Manson sucks.

    4. Re:How about something a bit more useful? by Tadrith · · Score: 2

      I find it more amusing that someone would think I'm concerned with garnering the respect of those who frequent Slashdot.

      Even more amusing is that someone else would reply simply with "so and so sucks", demonstrating a clear lack of respect in the first place by not providing reason or proof. Typically respect entails acknowledging someone's interest as their own, and and not making wild comments without some sort of fact.

    5. Re:How about something a bit more useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmm. Yes. How amusing.

      It's OK! I used to like Marylin Manson too!

  37. Heh by Pyrosz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought CmdrTaco was going to say:

    "Thats nothing- CowboyNeal can repel all known lifeforms just by standing there!

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  38. I remember this stuff from Back in the Day (tm) by jpmoney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the BBS days, I remember "a friend of mine" downloading a program that was supposed to emit "mind-altering" tones that would simulate drug-use/hallucinations. Basically the program just showed random screensaver-esque and nifty/trippy color stuff on the screen while making your pc-speaker buzz odd tones.

    Yeah, it was crap, but it just makes me wonder if this thing is crap too.

    --
    unf.
    1. Re:I remember this stuff from Back in the Day (tm) by tsa · · Score: 1

      Of course it's crap. Stinging mosquitos are deaf... But it's lots of fun!

      --

      -- Cheers!

    2. Re:I remember this stuff from Back in the Day (tm) by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, PC-DOPE! I always wanted to try it out to prove to myself that it was impossible, but it never made my PC make any sounds from either the built-in speaker *or* the audio output.

      In fact, it looks like you can still download it, at least from here: http://www.third-plateau.org/knowledgebase/downloa ds.shtml. Maybe I'll pull the old 486SX out of the closet so I don't overdose from running it on my Athlon XP system =).

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:I remember this stuff from Back in the Day (tm) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there is no reason to believe this is impossible. I don't know anything about the methods this program utilizes, but there are proven methods of stimulating various types of brainwave activity using sound. Research something known as 'binaural beats'.

  39. CmdrTaco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He can repel geeks from 200 miles with his blatent Heterosexuality.

    Props to poopbot.

  40. Best pest repellant by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

    is portsentry: repels dozens of pests every day!

    Combine it with heavy editing of /etc/inetd.conf and entries in hosts.allow and hosts.deny, you can keep the pests away from your boxen with very little effort. Tail -f /var/log/messages and you can see the little buggers trying to pester you right before *SWAT* they're locked out!

    --
    Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  41. Download it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Download it here: http://www.thaiware.com/software/util/UL00724.htm

  42. What kind fo filter would you use? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Speakers don't generate an exact range of sounds, with perfect reproduction inside the range and dead silence outside. You'd have to add some kind of way expensive filter. What would be the use?

  43. Re:I have no problem repelling pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    idiot

  44. Ideal for Simputer by teetam · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know about PCs in America, but the Indian Simputer definitely needs this feature!

    --
    All your favorite sites in one place!
  45. Oh, the memories by rcw-home · · Score: 2

    This reminds me of third grade when I'd program the Commodore 64 in the back of the classroom to generate a constant 18khz tone designed to covertly give everyone in the back row a headache. At the time, I was convinced they all deserved much worse. :)

    1. Re:Oh, the memories by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      That's beautiful, but...third grade!? You must've been one precocious kid...or had a programmer father. My dad showed me GW-BASIC when I was in elementary school but he's a machinist...I basically learned whatever I learned (not a whole lot, just enough to whet my appetite) on my own.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    2. Re:Oh, the memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's confusing a third grader's ability to type POKE 62473 18 and actual programming ability. Sorta like the people who like to say they 'program' HTML.

  46. Research shown to cause cancer in lab animals by XaXXon · · Score: 2

    Some users of the mosquito-repelling program have reported headaches after long periods spent in front of a computer emitting the bug-repelling high-pitched whine.

    Some users have reported headaches after long periods spent in front of a computer.

    College education costs are on the rise, and I think the actual college education is degrading just as fast...

  47. I've used such devices... by pieterh · · Score: 4, Funny

    In my house, which was overrun by mice when they demolished a run-down building beside us. Dozens of mice, everywhere. The device produces little high frequency clicks that drives mice totally crazy. They just love it! All the mice descended on my kitchen, where I put the thing, and ate my cat's food. The cat just watched. Finally I had to poison them with old editions of MSDN, which they chew and swallow but cannot digest. They explode in little blue puffs.
    Cockroaches and mosquitos are less common here in Belgium, where I'm writing from, but tomorrow I'm going to download Punyaratanabunbhu's (that's Puny for short) Anti-Mal and try it on the cat.
    This has to be one of the weirdest uses for old PCs that I can imagine, following my neighbour, who gave an old laptop (no HD, no battery) to his kids as a toy. It really hurt to see them drop it and squeal with joy.

    1. Re:I've used such devices... by doorbot.com · · Score: 5, Funny

      which was overrun by mice when they demolished a run-down building beside us

      The mice demolished a building!?! Did they hire an outside contractor or did they do it themselves? Either way, though, that's definitely an effective way to get back at the prior owners for the mousetraps and rat poison.

    2. Re:I've used such devices... by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Informative

      (* which they chew and swallow but cannot digest. They explode in little blue puffs. *)

      That reminds me of teenagers who steel raw sodium from chemistry labs, mix it with popcorn, and toss it all to birds at that beach. Once they get a taste of the popcorn, they come back for more, and the naturally-frosty-coated sodium resembles the popcorn. Thus, they mistake the sodium for popcorn, ingest it, and then explode in mid-air because the sodium hits water in their stumach. Tweet tweet Boom.

      I wonder what the penalty would be if you are 18+ and caught?

    3. Re:I've used such devices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're thinking of potassium metal

    4. Re:I've used such devices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pure sodium reacts violently with water, as well

    5. Re:I've used such devices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you can achieve the same results alka-seltzer, too.

      not that I know.

    6. Re:I've used such devices... by Ryokos_boytoy · · Score: 1

      Cruelty to animals is a fucking hoot. Thanks for sharing.

      I wonder what the penalty would be if you are 18+ and caught?

      Lets just hope they do get caught. Then their names sold to Co$ for mailings and personal visits

      --


      If you don't say anything, you won't be called on to repeat it. -- Calvin Coolidge
    7. Re:I've used such devices... by nathanm · · Score: 2
      That reminds me of teenagers who steel raw sodium from chemistry labs, mix it with popcorn, and toss it all to birds at that beach.
      Why go through all that trouble? It's much easier to go to your local grocery or drug store & buy some Alka-Seltzer.
    8. Re:I've used such devices... by JustinCourts · · Score: 1

      actually, any higher order Alkali metal will do the same...

    9. Re:I've used such devices... by GigsVT · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Cruelty to animals is a fucking hoot.

      I guess you are totally vegan too. Animals have no rights, at least until the point where we STOP FUCKING EATING THEM FOR LUNCH. Then maybe we might give them the right to vote, or something. Maybe dolphins could vote, like Flipper, he was smart. And maybe Lassie, but then if Lassie could vote, she/he would ban abandoned wells. What was I talking about again?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    10. Re:I've used such devices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      who steel raw sodium

      steel? from raw sodium?

      wow, an alchemist's dream. how soon til they gold from raw wood?

    11. Re:I've used such devices... by gid · · Score: 1

      or rice... which they used to throw at weddings

      notice how they do bird seeds or bubbles now?

      The rice would expand with water in the bird's stomach and also make them explode as far as I know. I've never seen either method in action, nor do I intend to, as I try to respect all living creatures to a point. (I still squash icky bugs that wander into my house)

    12. Re:I've used such devices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should try this on each other rather than some poor animals, anyone who finds this amusing is a waste of oxygen anyway. dont let mom catch you doing it she might spank you.

    13. Re:I've used such devices... by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think I can support animal rights and still eat them. Just treat them nice while they are here... that's all I ask. Don't kill them for fun... just kill them to eat. Summed up easily enough for you?

      --

      -pyrrho

    14. Re:I've used such devices... by wolfgang_spangler · · Score: 1

      $500 dollar fine, and I'm sure some cruelty to animal charges.

    15. Re:I've used such devices... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Ya know those little packets of silicon drying agent that come packaged with some stuff (like hard disks)?? Wait til your roommate is good and drunk and about to go to the john, then dump one of the packets in the toilet. If you get a good one, it makes the most wonderful rattlesnake buzz... For even more fun, get said drunken roommate to drink the juice from canned beets. Listen for the screams the next morning when he visits the john and thinks he's dying :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:I've used such devices... by Road · · Score: 1

      The rice would expand with water in the bird's stomach and also make them explode as far as I know.

      There should be a -1 propagating urban legend moderation. I wasted a mod point by responding, but somtimes you need to set the record straight.

      see here

    17. Re:I've used such devices... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      Heh heh. If you kill it, you've got to eat it. That's great. Oh, you killed a cockroach that snuck into your kitchen? You can't let it die for no reason! Scrape it up and put it on a plate! You hit a coyote with your car on the way home? Better put it in the trunk for later.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    18. Re:I've used such devices... by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      clever but pointless.

      The extreme case we were discussing was killing something in a cruel way just to watch it happen. Killing cockroaches because they bring disease is also a good enough reason that still does not imply that you can do just anything you want to anything you want to destroy for no good reason.

      Accidentally killing something with your car does not obligate you to eat it. If you hit a person in your car, I'm not saying you have to eat it... but that example also doesn't justify killing a person on purpose, does it!?

      Your logic seems to be... I can kill for a good reason, therefore I can kill for no reason at all. Doesn't follow.

      --

      -pyrrho

    19. Re:I've used such devices... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      Whatever. I obviously wasn't being serious.

      This reminds me of that type of fish you can order in Japan where the chef will cut into the fish while it is still alive to slice off pieces of the fish to give to customers. The fish is alive, gasping for air. When you eat your piece of fish, the muscles in it still twitch as you chew and swallow it.

      It's not really killing it in a cruel way just to watch it happen, it's doing it in a way to enjoy eating the resulting meat. Aparrantly this is a very uncommon delicacy and it is very very expensive.

      God created this whole "survival of the fittest", "heirarchy of murder" thing, so go complain to him.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    20. Re:I've used such devices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I can't make that complaint as I feel God doesn't really exists. But...

      I think your fish example is much better than the roach example, as that seems like a cruel thing, while still being a food source. That's a legitimate blurring of the lines, and in that case I guess I would side with your "they don't have rights anyway" point and not be in great opposition to the practice.

      I don't feel too serious either, but I guess I'm more serious than you about this issue in that I really despise the idea that, for example, cows have to be thought of dumb animals, practically walking dead, in order for people to feel ok about eating them.

      My main point in our side discussion or in general is that you can respect an animal, believe it has intellectual and spiritual and emotional qualities, and still say, "yum, tasty!"

      In fact, in antiquity and with tribal people it's far more common to diefy the animal food source than demonize or deanimate them. Logically, if someone was used to eating sea gulls (using the example), they would probably have their own sort of repulsion at the idea of killing the birds for "fun" because, in addition to the cruetly, for them it's a waste!

      For most Americans, it's not this way, but I think they are just lying to themselves and ought to think again. That is, if a cow having emotions and some sort of intellect implies to someone that they shouldn't be eaten... that person probably shouldn't be eating them so as to live by what they believe. Lying to themselves that animals are not alive, or don't feel pain, or don't "want" to live, etc. seems pointless. I say, give into the apparent fact that animals do possess all these special qualities that a couple hundred years ago people would have liked to say were "special" about humans, and then act accordingly.

      Accordingly in my case is to acknowledge that animals do eat each other, we are omnivores, whether a god was involved in creating that situation or not. I'm not a vegan in the least, I say, eat em up (but try to give them a decent environment to grow in, not only from kindness but in the interest in the general health of what we're consuming).

  48. Re:I have no problem repelling pests by tsa · · Score: 1

    Why was this modded up?

    --

    -- Cheers!

  49. True! by awfwal · · Score: 1

    Get your computer to play the BeeGees and you'll repel almost anything

  50. I have a better idea by tswinzig · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you are in a developed country, and you are constantly having problems with mosquitos, cockroaches, and rats around your workspace, simply MOVE YOUR FUCKING COMPUTER INDOORS!

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:I have a better idea by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "If you are in a developed country, and you are constantly having problems with mosquitos, cockroaches, and rats around your workspace, simply MOVE YOUR FUCKING COMPUTER INDOORS!"

      Perhaps people in developed countries would like this if they compute outside via WiFi or (like me) have their box in the cool basement where it is more common to see insects.

      In the area of Canada where I live, it's not too uncommon just before the winter for ladybugs (ok ladyBEETLES) to swarm in homes. This means that TENS OF MILLIONS get into your place via tiny cracks in bricks and window spaces live in your house for some time when it's about to get cold. This means that there are so many, you can't see your walls anymore. Maybe this software would work on them. (Fortunately this has never happenned at my place. We replaced all the rickety old windows with new ones.)

      The traditional method of removal is to get a big ol' shop-vac and vaccum them up and then turn the vac on reverse and shoot them outside. This is becoming more and more of a problem because of the massive reproduction of asian ladybeetles imported to combat aphids in farmers' fields.

    2. Re:I have a better idea by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      Shop-vac, huh. I was figuring it might make more sense to buy a bunch of plaster, silicone patching material, and caulk. Of course not everyone has a shop-vac. The good ones aren't cheap. Pity the person who can afford a computer but not $50 worth of patching supplies to keep the bugs out in the first place.

    3. Re:I have a better idea by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "I was figuring it might make more sense to buy a bunch of plaster, silicone patching material, and caulk. Of course not everyone has a shop-vac. The good ones aren't cheap. Pity the person who can afford a computer but not $50 worth of patching supplies to keep the bugs out in the first place."

      The trouble is not buying the supplies, it's finding out where they get in. This is not easy. From the accounts I have read, very very few people have been able to find out exactly how the ladybeetles get into their home. And by the time you do find the place they enter, your home is already invaded, meaning you need a vaccum anyway. Since shop vacs can be rented from many industrial supply companies, the expense is not too great.

  51. This reminds me... by jargoone · · Score: 0

    My first CS class in undergrad was Pascal. It had a function that let you play the speaker at a designated frequency for a period of time. I used to set it to bounce between two very high frequencies (say 12k-14k Hz) so you couldn't really hear it that well, then leave the room for a couple hours. My roommates knew something was up, but they never figured it out.

  52. I need one for ANTS. by legomad · · Score: 1

    yep, those red ants.

    1. Re:I need one for ANTS. by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Funny
      I found that a four-part solution works best for ants:

      First, clean your kitchen and bathroom with a bleach-based cleaner (Soft Scrub) -- this will erase scent trails. Put all food in plastic bags or the fridge and be sure there isn't any water left in the sink.

      Next, follow them to estalish their points of entry and spackle them up if possible.

      Now, remove all pets/young children from the house and use the RAID ant killer. Spray it into any crevices you couldn't spackle. Kill 'em all.

      Finally, douse your home with liberal amounts of gasoline and light the place on fire. If you have connections with Air Guard personnel, convince them to check out an A6 and perform a follow-up napalm strike.

      Of course, this will only stop the ants for a while, but should still be a much-welcome reprieve from the things.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:I need one for ANTS. by gmajor · · Score: 1

      I read that using WD-40 (yes, the lubricant) also kills ants by suffocating them or something like that. Pretty cool.

    3. Re:I need one for ANTS. by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Don't forget, you've got to schedule the napalm strikes to start by making a ring around your neighborhood and then working inward. Don't leave them ants anywhere to run...

      However, in my one experience with fire ants (in the base housing at an Air Force Base in New Mexico), we discovered that their nests go deeper than 5 feet. Napalm would only incovenience them a little. I'm not sure a backhoe would go deep enough. A nuke would work, but only if the crater was centered on the nest. What you want to do is to find a poison that the forager ants will carry down to the brain bugs, I mean queen, in their deep underground chambers. Trouble is, fire ants are pretty smart about avoiding poisons, too...

      But ants only come into your house for one of two things - food or water. It's possible to ensure they won't find enough food to be worth a long and perilous journey. (But make sure you aren't dealing with one of the species that eats 2x4's!) I don't know how far they'll travel for water, but if you are watering the yard regularly, they won't need to...

    4. Re:I need one for ANTS. by Ryokos_boytoy · · Score: 1

      Actually, try ground clove across their trails. They hate it. Old country trick

      --


      If you don't say anything, you won't be called on to repeat it. -- Calvin Coolidge
    5. Re:I need one for ANTS. by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Diazinon granules (a corncob-based brand like Scott's, NOT a newsprint-based brand like Ortho) ... two tablespoons placed atop the hill will kill the ENTIRE mound overnight, even for "fire ants" (the aggressive ants that build mounds two feet high). Also, ants will not cross a diazinon-treated barrier zone as little as 3 feet wide. Two treatments two weeks apart will protect your house for up to 4 months. PS, also works for fleas.

      Unfortunately diazinon is being phased out, and there is no equally-effective replacement, so start hording it while you still can.

      (I like ants, just not in my cupboards.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  53. Re:I have no problem repelling pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or more accurately:

    "I just make asinine karma-whoring comments like this, and I'm friend-free."

  54. Re:I have no problem repelling pests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was still at 2 when you looked, it wasn't modded up. The jackass used his +1 posting bonus to put it up there, since he thought it was some kind of great way to whore some karma.

    Of course, it's possible some dipshit fell for it in the interim and *did* mod it up before someone rightfully slapped it down.

  55. MP3s by tmark · · Score: 2

    CowboyNeal can repel all known lifeforms just by playing his massive collection of boy band MP3s.

    And of course, since file-sharing doesn't mean piracy, CowboyNeal owns the CDs, doesn't he.. .

  56. WOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things! Then you could stop those damned locusts!

  57. Don't just repel pests... by da3dAlus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't give them a reason to get near you in the first place! Take a bath every day--it's a great excuse to get away from your computer for a while (and I promise that a little soap won't hurt you). That, and why not take a minute to clean up all the soda cans and pizza boxes lying around your desk/room/office. Unless you work outside, live in a dorm, or some other run-down dwelling, I don't see why you would need to repel anything in the first place. If you are attracting rodents, maybe you need to get a little better with the personal hygiene.

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
    1. Re:Don't just repel pests... by Zone5 · · Score: 1

      Not to throw you off your rant there, but if you'd ever been on a fishing trip into the north woods of Ontario for a week or so you'd know by now that the smell of soap actually is an attractant to most insects.

      As far as theinsects go, you're better off washing in clean water and not using soap at all, or else the mosquitos and blackflies will eat you alive.

      Note: This is not meant to be taken as an excuse for geeks to omit soap from their daily lives - the relative effects are reversed on the human species!

      --
      "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
    2. Re:Don't just repel pests... by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny
      Don't give them a reason to get near you in the first place! Take a bath every day--it's a great excuse to get away from your computer for a while (and I promise that a little soap won't hurt you). That, and why not take a minute to clean up all the soda cans and pizza boxes lying around your desk/room/office....If you are attracting rodents, maybe you need to get a little better with the personal hygiene.
      Revoke this dude's Geek Membership immediately! He is just not one of us.
    3. Re:Don't just repel pests... by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you live. Move to Texas for a summer, and then tell me pests don't bug you unless you do something to attract them. (I've had more insect bites in Austin in the last month than in the three years prior spent in California).

    4. Re:Don't just repel pests... by Gekko · · Score: 1

      Interesting I am from Minneapolis and was visiting Austin this weekend. Illinois/Wisconsin/Minnesota insects love my soap and eat me alive. Down their everyone elese was getting eaten alive and I was fine......

      --
      I mod down any one who says "I'm sure I will get modded down for this"
    5. Re:Don't just repel pests... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I live in an apartment complex which has cockroaches. Hence, I have cockroaches. Incidentally, a spot of grease the size of a head of a pin will feed a cockroach for a month, according to the terminix guy, so even though we clean our kitchen carefully, that's really not going to help. We'd have to steam clean the whole thing every day. Besides, they can eat the glue from your packages of food and such.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  58. +1: Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hee hee! This paints some nice mental images. A little heavy on the use of the brown end of the spectrum however...

  59. You mean like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean like THE WIPO TROLL ...? You fucking suck.

  60. Re:And where do mosquitoes, cockroaches and rats g by jimmytheant · · Score: 1

    There already is one being sold, its a plug in unit. Might be where this came from... i.e. reverse engineering.

  61. Gotcha covered. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    I've got an insect and pest repellent... It's called a sub-woofer.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Gotcha covered. by mudshark · · Score: 1

      Um, you got it backwards. The "sub-woofer" is an attractant to backwards-baseball-cap-wearing sloping-brow ne'er-do-wells who appear to be symbiotic with hydrocarbon-consuming exoskeletons adorned with superfluous blue lights and chrome trash cans attached to the posterior. I think they're rodents, but an insect classification wouldn't surprise me.

      --
      In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
  62. For all the AFX fans out there by sielwolf · · Score: 2

    I just play Ventolin off of Aphex Twin's I Care Because You Do at full volume.

    It works pretty well. Although now when I turn off my computer, I can still hear it.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:For all the AFX fans out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it wasn't for the high-pitched screech, I'd really love that song! Very cool beat and a wicked bass kick. all set to the lovingly relaxing--SCREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEECH

      I think he did it to try and burst a few speakers or eardrums just for fun.

  63. Re:And where do mosquitoes, cockroaches and rats g by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

    Moe: "Okay, everybody tuck your pants into your socks!"

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  64. I don't think so. by eikonoklastes · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    This type of technology has been advertised many times on infomercials. It just doesn't work, though. My wife bought one of those roach repellers that plugs into the wall and emitts sound and EM pulses. Guess what? No change. We didn't have roaches before and we still don't.

    I would imagine if this type of beg repellant really did work cities would have speakers everywhere. They don't because it doesn't.

  65. Some Ham radios offer this too by SpaceGhost · · Score: 1

    I have an Alinco handheld ham radio (2m) that offers this feature. I cant imagine running the battery down for a dubious effect, when I can get backwoods Off(tm) (100% DEET) or that military cream, and really keep them off. Yes, it's nasty smelly and possibly cancerous, but Houston (like most of the country apparently) has West Nile in a BROAD spectrum of the mosquito population (we used to just have to avoid the culex mosquitos, small dusk-time ones that carried St. Louis Encephalitis.)

    BTW, Cowboy neals boy band mp3s repel pests because likes repel, opposites attract (which is why Cdr. Taco likes them soo much...)

  66. Ah, internal speakers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presuming this is on an internal speaker, I'm gonna wax nostalgic.

    That little thing was cool.. anyone remember RealSound in Access Software games, where they'd play voice and music samples through the internal speaker?

    I wrote a routine that did this for my own little shoot 'em up Xerix... you'd set the timer going at 8000 times a second (instead of the usual 18.2 :), and turn the speaker on or off depending on whether the 8-bit sample value was positive or negative. There was a more advanced technique that was quieter, but much smoother-sounding, that gave several levels of volume, instead of just on/off.

    Of course, there would always be a carrier frequency of 8000 hz, which was pretty annoying.

    I miss those days!

  67. Pests by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

    repel mosquitoes, cockroaches, and rats

    I am much more worried about repelling Mo$quitoes and RIAAts.

    --
    TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
  68. I've got this program running on my TRS-80. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2


    10 SOUND 255,255
    20 GOTO 10

    1. Re:I've got this program running on my TRS-80. by lordaych · · Score: 1

      Does the sound statement in TRS-80 basic work the same as the sound statement in Microsoft Quick/QBasic? In QBasic, the syntax is SOUND frequency_in_hertz, duration_in_hundredths_of_a_second... Since the human hearing range starts around 37 hz or so, this would be a clearly audible and obnoxious constant sound...

    2. Re:I've got this program running on my TRS-80. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, so what if its an annoying buzz. TRS80 basic was based off the same functionality as the early IBM PCjr and others. Very versatile, but pokey.

      Funny how time changes your perspective though.

  69. As a Lawyer, I can guarantee that you are wrong by SubjectLineTroller · · Score: 0

    In my job as an IT consultant and Investment Banker/Artist, I have learned that 100% of people appealing to authority as anonymous cowards are lying about it.

    1. Re:As a Lawyer, I can guarantee that you are wrong by cduffy · · Score: 2

      Not quite 100%... more like 95% or so. Occasionally someone who's an authority on something needs to hide their identity to avoid a potential lawsuit for NDA breakage, or has their /. login not work, or doesn't have an account, or somesuch.

      Hence, I consider it worthwhile to actually research such claims (if they look plausible) before publicly denouncing their accuracy. Perhaps you should consider doing likewise?

  70. This too! by dmarien · · Score: 2

    I could have sworn this was a dupe post... i had read about this (i though here) months ago...

    But my search revealed nothing... cept this story about a device which repels sharks...

    --
    dmarien
    1. Re:This too! by God!+Awful · · Score: 2

      A local radio station has been claiming that their broadcast repels mosquitos for several years now. I always thought it was just a publicity stunt, but maybe they have been using the same technology.

      -a

    2. Re:This too! by topham · · Score: 2

      It is a stunt. FM radio won't support frequencies high enough to be helpfull.

    3. Re:This too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if it's a dupe, but it certainly isn't news:
      I first ran across a program to repel mosquitos through generating high-pitch noise on an Atari ST magazine disk (STart magazine, I think)

      Can't remember when, but since it was in my Atari ST days it was at least 10 years ago.

    4. Re:This too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we've concluded there are no frequencies that would be helpful, so it doesn't matter anyways.

  71. Better repellent by Zenki · · Score: 1

    Dump a big CO2 source away from you, like a big brick of dry ice. (As Alton Brown would suggest) The mosquitos and other blood suckers will probably gravitate there because they have evolved to be attracted to CO2.

    CO2 -> Living creature breathing -> Free food.

    It's probably a lot better than some "ultrasonic" pest repellent.

    1. Re:Better repellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about an open can of soda?

    2. Re:Better repellent by Dahan · · Score: 2

      Dunno about that... mosquitos are attracted to warm, moist CO2 (such as the exhaled breath of animals), but there seems to be some doubt about whether they're attracted to dry ice.

    3. Re:Better repellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when you go swimming in the ocean, be sure to first dump a bleeding cow carcass into the water so as to avoid sharks.

    4. Re:Better repellent by kuiken · · Score: 1

      dont think it works (atleast verry well)
      AFAIK the litle buggers hunt on Co2/heat, other types seem to hunt on smell/heat
      anyway, dry ice doesnt realy give off much heat, but having dry ice all over the place looks cool tho

      --

      42
  72. a similar program by slugo3 · · Score: 1

    here is a similar program that claims to help you stop smoking, drinking and cures headaches among other things. www.bwgen.com

  73. Dragonflies by f00Dave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A friend of mine once proposed building a mechanical box that duplicated, in hardware, the two-winged thrum of a dragonfly. He spends a LOT of time outside, wandering about in the woods and in marshes and has come to the conclusion that as soon as a dragonfly appears, the mosquitoes seem to vanish.

    Now, it's either that he only noticed the 'fly after it ate all the little turds, or they're hardwired to flee the noise of it's wings.

    I'm wondering if that particular thrumming sound would be effective (since the high-pitched whine version would probably drive me nuts anyway: I can sense tones up to 21KHz or so ... TVs drive me up the wall).

    So, who's got a recording of dragonfly sounds they want to share(ware)? ;-)

    --
    .f00Dave
    1. Re:Dragonflies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can sense tones up to 21KHz or so ... "

      Yeah, right.

    2. Re:Dragonflies by f00Dave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I can sense tones up to 21KHz or so ... "

      Yeah, right.


      This isn't an uncommon claim. Go look, keeping in mind that I said "sense" (which some of the below translate as "feel"):

      Dumbed down: http://home.netvigator.com/~ntomyng/dcc900/compare /

      More technical: http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/psychoacoustics

      Etcetera.

      --
      .f00Dave
    3. Re:Dragonflies by ejungle · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. It always frustrates me when a TV is broadcasting dead air (whether it be because its getting no signal, it isn't tuned to the right input or whatever) and someone else then proceeds to shut the TV off because they don't know it's on.

      It took me a while to figure out not everyone hears that high-pitched whine. Though, it doesn't bother me as much now as it used to. I'm not sure whether the desensitization is physical, psycological or both. =/

      --
      Remember: umount it before you fsck it.
    4. Re:Dragonflies by f00Dave · · Score: 1

      It took me a while to figure out not everyone hears that high-pitched whine. Though, it doesn't bother me as much now as it used to. I'm not sure whether the desensitization is physical, psycological or both.

      It's partly biological: your ceiling lowers as you age. It's partly psychological: as you watch the Idiot Box, you begin to subconsciously 'tune out' the tone. It's partly mechanical: TV technology has improved, resulting in thinner laminations (or whatever) in the flyback transformers, thereby reducing the emitted high-frequency noise.

      Of course, it didn't help that 99% of the engineers working on TV technology were 50+, so couldn't hear the tone in the first place. My worst nightmare was having to sit and code support stuff out on the 'floor' of an air traffic control center, next to racks and racks of CRT drivers, all screeching at ~21KHz, and being the only one who could hear it.

      Eventually, the techies got really tired of hearing me complain about it, so hooked up a spectrum analyzer to a microphone to prove to me that it didn't exist. Guess where the big spike was.... Anyway, they moved my work area. ;-D

      --
      .f00Dave
  74. Gee... by Uttles · · Score: 2

    Some users of the mosquito-repelling program have reported headaches after long periods spent in front of a computer emitting the bug-repelling high-pitched whine.

    Who would have ever guessed?

    --

    ~ now you know
  75. Real programmers... by GlassHeart · · Score: 3, Funny

    use gdb to get rid of bugs.

    1. Re:Real programmers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOT FUNNY.

    2. Re:Real programmers... by Mirk · · Score: 1
      Joking, right?

      Real real programmers use adb.

      --

      --
      What short sigs we have -
      One hundred and twenty chars!
      Too short for haiku.
  76. Reminds me of something... by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Borland compilers, there was an example in the online help demonstrating proper usage of the sound() function... There's a brief description here. And yes, this was really in the help files :)

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    1. Re:Reminds me of something... by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, I remember reading that when I used borland's compiler (4.0 or 5.0 I think) in high school (this is in the late 90s, which should tell you something about my high school's willingness to fund the computer lab)...This led into about 5 minutes spent trying to figure out the resonant capacity of human skulls, spoiled by someone realizing that we didn't have nearly enough power...as I look back on that I think "how could I have been so stupid", but that's life.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    2. Re:Reminds me of something... by shadowofdarkness · · Score: 1

      One fun thing when people would be away from there computer was to quickly create and run this program main() { sound(1000); } we where using computers in Dos and when run the only way to stop the sound was create and run a prog to turn it off but since most kids in the class didn't know how they just rebooted there computer. another one that is fun is create a loop that plays 1 frequency for a second then increases the frequency. ps the last one ended up with the teacher announcing to the class he would look the other way will anyone beat on me

    3. Re:Reminds me of something... by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      You can achieve the same effect much easier...just pull the anti theft cord...and you can always claim it is an accident...well first time at least.

      --
      badness 10000
  77. This program crashes Windows by gosand · · Score: 3, Funny
    I ran this program on every version of Windows, and every time I started it, Windows would crash.

    I guess because the software effectively repels bugs.

    badum-tshh. Thanks! I'll be here all week, tip your waitresses.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:This program crashes Windows by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 1

      dear god that was aful.

      --
      the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
  78. Terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its gonna give me a head ache!

  79. Need Frequency So I Can Create An MP3!! by lukegalea1234 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know the frequency of sound this thing produces? I want to create an mp3 of it so I can make a more portable version..

    (Ya.. I know they sell watches, etc.. that create the same noise.. but I'm cheap.. )

  80. Not a solution for anything... by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    If you are having issues with pests in your home, using this (if it even works) is just attempting to cure the symptoms. The real solution is to wash the dishes, clean the house, mop the floors, and find out why and how these things are getting in.

    Best prevention? Cleanliness!

    BTW - Arguing that you will use this while camping will just make you look dumb.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  81. haha.... by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    Think about that for a minute. An MP3 of an inaudible sound.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:haha.... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Think Vorbis can do it? :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:haha.... by Zone5 · · Score: 1

      How is this an outlandish concept? There are already recordings of complete silence which have been copyrighted and released on CD... creating an MP3 of one is a logical next progression.

      --
      "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
    3. Re:haha.... by undeg+chwech · · Score: 1

      MP3 is lossy compression. It works by removing components of the music that you will not notice are missing.

      One would expect that inaubible frequencies would fall in this category.

    4. Re:haha.... by Zone5 · · Score: 1

      If it's indistinguishable from the original, then isn't it for all intents and purposes the original?

      Okay, sort of a one-hand-clapping question, but really... 4:33 (that recorded silence I mentioned) sounds the same on CD, radio, and MP3.

      It's a stupid idea, surely. Just not overly revolutionary.

      Now, as for compressing the "bug repellent noise"... that's an interesting point. It may render it useless as far as bugs do, despite its being indistinguishable to humans. Quite interesting, actually.

      --
      "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
    5. Re:haha.... by lukegalea1234 · · Score: 1

      true.. a wav or some lossly compression format would work fine I bet..

  82. Limitations of PC speaker by Curtee · · Score: 1

    If this actually works, someone should write a version of it that runs through the soundcard. It would give a much better frequency response and have the ability to emit multiple tones simultaneously.

  83. Make sure the polarity is right by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


    I played the sounds backward and all the pests came back.

    1. Re:Make sure the polarity is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's funny... when I played it backwards I heard a demonic voice that told me to install p2p software and swipe some mp3s.

    2. Re:Make sure the polarity is right by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* That's funny... when I played it backwards I heard a demonic voice that... *)

      Once my family's church group got all fired up about demonic sayings in pop music. I decided to set out to debunk some of it. The song, "Another one bites the dust" says something like "smoke marijuana" when played backwards. The word "smoke" was kind of a longshot if you heard it, but "marijuana" was pretty clear. I found out that the phrase "another one" was the culprit. So any song that has "another one" in it would have to be banned according to this trigger-happy group.

      I then randomly grabbed a Bill Cosby comedy album off the shelf and found 2 demonic phrases in it within about half an hour.

      It is kind of like looking for patterns in puffy clouds. If you look hard enough there are all kinds of shapes up there. Does that mean that God is putting on a show, or that humans have over-active imaginations?

      (No Elvis found up there yet)

  84. Great Idea... by Art_XIV · · Score: 2

    All we need now is a way to repel sale and/or marketing people with speakers

    --
    The only thing that we learn from history is that nobody learns anything from history.
  85. Works on humans too by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    For a quick test, I stood up in the middle of the office, and made an opera-like squeal for as long as I could, until my voice went horse.

    Eventually everybody in the nearby cubicles left.

    The drawback, though, is that you have to eat lunch alone.

  86. Open Source debugger? by isdnip · · Score: 2

    I assume that the common version of this works in Windoze, since that's the mass market fave. But what do Linux and other Unix fans do? Clearly, this is one debugger that needs an open source version!

    Leesse... Gnu Debugger, new switches to be added:
    repel mouse
    repel mosquito
    repel cowboy neal... no, he's okay.

  87. boy band MP3s. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Thats nothing- CowboyNeal can repel all known lifeforms just by playing his massive collection of boy band
    MP3s."

    I am now totally convince he is gay!

  88. Looks like he beat me! by jsonmez · · Score: 1

    I am writing a program that ticks off bees. Basically what would happen is your sitting at your computer, you run my program in the background, and all of the suddent all the bees, wasps, and other flying stining creatures in your neighborhood start flying into your glass windows, till they eventually break, at which point...

  89. Boss-B-Gone by borgasm · · Score: 2, Funny

    As I see it, the next step for this software is to repel all co-workers and bosses who think they are smarter than you.

    Maybe you can write a script that keeps these pests away when servers go down or when somebody approaches your desk.

    At the very least they will be complaining from 2m (6 feet) or more. At that distance, you can hopefully just shut the door.

    "Yeah...Peter...I'm gonna have to go ahead and ask you to go ahead and...:::::SCREECHING HIGH FREQUENCY SOUNDS:::::

  90. Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiots repeat this BULLSHIT that has been debunked by vigorous scientific evidence. Number ONE, mosquitoes have no ears! Hard to believe, but true! Sound powerful enough to repel mosquitoes would be in the megawatt range and would repel Thai's too, despite the massive amounts of ganja they obviously smoke!
    Numba 2, most insects have no ears as such, but can sense vibrations. Roached will scurry away when sonic pressure changes, but if it remains constany, they tune it out. Try citronella candles and then pyrethum based insecticides. Or move to Antartica, thy are big down there, but the season lasts a very short time..

    1. Re:Once again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's true. Last year I had a fruit fly invasion in the kitchen from some spoiled fruit.

      For laughs, I wanted to burn them so I got my can of butane and a lighter. This was very dangerous and the little blighters actually had time to fly away before burning, ergo good sight.

      Not to be outdone by something with a neural net as small as a /. editor's penis, I figured the little shits don't have ears so I grabbed my Dirt Devil and just sucked them away. Worked great.

      I think anyone with insect problems should buy a Shop Vac and just suck them away.

  91. No, that won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That theory actually makes sense why would anyone want to market that?

  92. You didn't have roaches before,and you still don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so why would you buy a repeller, and how do you know it doesn't work?

    This type of technology has been advertised many times on infomercials. It just doesn't work, though. My wife bought one of those roach repellers that plugs into the wall and emitts sound and EM pulses. Guess what? No change. We didn't have roaches before and we still don't.

    I would imagine if this type of beg repellant really did work cities would have speakers everywhere. They don't because it doesn't

  93. Summer Radio by MotherErich · · Score: 0

    I've never heard of anyone setting up a computer to repel rodents, but the idea of using sound waves as a mosquito repellant is actually fairly old. I'm from Minnesota, where the summertime masquitos get pretty bad; fortunately most, if not all, of the local radio stations will embed a high frequency sound into the radio transmission so that if you're outside listening to your favorite station, the bugs really aren't too bad.

    The rats and cockroaches are definitely new to me though.

    --
    You have to be smarter than the machine you're working with.
    1. Re:Summer Radio by j-beda · · Score: 2
      where did you get this little factoid?

      Wanna buy a bridge?

    2. Re:Summer Radio by hex1848 · · Score: 2

      I've never heard of anyone setting up a computer to repel rodents, but the idea of using sound waves as a mosquito repellant is actually fairly old. I'm from Minnesota, where the summertime masquitos get pretty bad; fortunately most, if not all, of the local radio stations will embed a high frequency sound into the radio transmission so that if you're outside listening to your favorite station, the bugs really aren't too bad.

      I thought all the clear channel radio stations did this.. only they also repel all the listeners as well

    3. Re:Summer Radio by MotherErich · · Score: 0

      The RADIO.

      --
      You have to be smarter than the machine you're working with.
  94. No need for special software ... by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2

    The fan and hard drive noise alone from my box is enough to drop flies at ten feet.

  95. FINALLY, I don't have to read any more... by gosand · · Score: 2
    A Thai guy wrote a program that uses your computer speaker to repel mosquitoes, cockroaches, and rats!

    YAHOO! WHEEEEE ! IT IS ABOUT FRIGGIN' TIME. OH MY THAT IS THE GREATES...

    Oh.
    rats.
    I thought it said Katz.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  96. MS should license the technology by 2Bits · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey since this thing repels bugs, I think MS should license this technology and make it part of their OS, and we would get a bug-free system, wouldn't we?

  97. hee by byrd77 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gives whole new meaning to "RAID array"

    --
    - Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.
  98. I Cannot Download It!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody here know where else I can download this program from? The Thailand site says I do not have permission. D'oh!

  99. Either I'm a dog... by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or this isn't ultrasonic: I can definitely hear Anti-MAL's sounds for all three pests. And the sounds aren't pretty: they're enough to repel me. BZZZZZZZZ....

    1. Re:Either I'm a dog... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can I get this program? The Thailand site won't let me. :(

  100. /. ' ed by TheKubrix · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the troubled (ie lazy), you can see the page here (and download it from the mirror sites located at the bottom), bug proggie

  101. thats nothing... by jon+doh! · · Score: 4, Funny

    i've used my computer to repel women for years...

  102. Re:But why? by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

    LMAO! Really - full bodied guffaw! Did no one else consider this?

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  103. Hey by papasui · · Score: 1

    Can anyone else hear that terrible noise?

  104. Woohoo! I'm love'n this... by SCSI-Wan · · Score: 1

    I've just hooked my box up to my surround system and cranked up this pest control software. Not only does the high pitch screeching have the rodents running, but my annoying neighbors who bug me for tech support haven't came around all day! I'm loving this. Granted I have to stay locked in another room with earmuffs on, but I think its worth the trade-off. Good thing my landlord is deaf... /*SCSI-Wan*/

  105. This has possibilities! by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    Can we get this guy to tweek his program to repell RIAA personel?

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  106. Re:You didn't have roaches before,and you still do by eikonoklastes · · Score: 1
    My point was that most "supporting evidence" is similar to this: purely anecdotal. There never seems to be any real, objective studies done. You are correct in pointing out that I didn't state it clearly.

    As to why I would buy it if we didn't have any roaches in the first place...ask my wife. She's always buying shit we don't need (and she gets angry when I try to buy stuff we do [like that 56in TV]).

  107. System Dependencies and a FREE GIFT!! by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    Please note that in order to work properly, the system library files PLACEBO.DLL and GULLIBLE.DLL must be present in your C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM directory, and C:\EXPLORE.EXE must be moved from the C:\WINDOWS directory into the Recycle Bin.

    And if you act now, we'll throw in this free HANDS FREE CELL-PHONE ADAPTER!

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

    1. Re:System Dependencies and a FREE GIFT!! by darc · · Score: 1

      Now, the sad part is that I saw those on ebay a while back, only that they added the image after people bid.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
  108. Not actually a pun. by jefft · · Score: 1
    I'm just being a pain, but that technically wasn't a pun.

    From dictionary.com a pun is "play on words, sometimes on different senses of the same word and sometimes on the similar sense or sound of different words."

    The "pun" here is presumably on the word "heard". However, it's two identical uses of the word. Maybe a bad joke, but not a pun.

  109. Re:And where do mosquitoes, cockroaches and rats g by Com2Kid · · Score: 2
    • There already is one being sold, its a plug in unit. Might be where this came from... i.e. reverse engineering.
    Alright, question here folks;

    Do these things really work??? I mean you can buy little handheld ultrasonic bug repellers down at the supermarket for $13 or $14 here in the States, I am wondering if the darn things work at all before I spend some money on them.
  110. SETI gets a boost by shrikel · · Score: 1
    Thats nothing- CowboyNeal can repel all known lifeforms just by playing his massive collection of boy band MP3s.

    Great! Just set a Gigawatt transmitter to broadcast the stuff into space, and see which systems start accelerating away from us! Voila! Life!

    Oh, wait, he said "known" lifeforms ...

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    1. Re:SETI gets a boost by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* Great! Just set a Gigawatt transmitter to broadcast the stuff into space, and see which systems start accelerating away from us! Voila! Life! *)

      What if alien bugs actually like that crap and swarm over here?

      Hell, Yoko Ono albums from the 60's might be the latest craze on Theta 5 for all we know. (IIRC, a Yoko song was playing when the Waco group lit themselves up. Does anybody have that playlist?)

    2. Re:SETI gets a boost by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      Just set a Gigawatt transmitter to broadcast the stuff into space, and see which systems start accelerating away from us! Voila! Life!

      One can only imagine how freaked out E.T. would have been if he had heard Britney. He would have been dying to get back on the spaceship. Possibly literally.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
  111. Won't this lead to mass starvation in Thailand?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news Korean's eat dogs!

  112. I never denied the claim. Just the appeal. by SubjectLineTroller · · Score: 0

    The sound of horse humping could drive mosquitos away for all I care. Facts are Facts, with or without a degree.

    1. Re:I never denied the claim. Just the appeal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sound of tub-thumping could drive mosquitos away for all I care. Farts are farts, with or without teepee... ;-)

  113. Computer Headaches? by roccothegreat · · Score: 1

    Some users of the mosquito-repelling program have reported headaches after long
    periods spent in front of a computer emitting the bug-repelling high-pitched whine.


    Strange, and here I thought it was those long periods of playing Counter-Strike on my
    computer!

    rocco.

  114. getting rid of pests by urmensch · · Score: 0

    truly one of the most obnoxious songs around.
    it worked for me too, i used it to get rid of a bunch of greeks at a house party once.

  115. damned tech support! by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Troll


    Everytime I start it up, my dog comes over and tries to hump my leg. I called tech support, and they told me to use condums.

  116. What about Cowboy Neals Collection of boy MPEGS??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cowboy Kneel.. Get it?

  117. What is a COMPUTER doing around infestation? by krinsh · · Score: 1

    How many of you keep the animals out of the home office; run AC, box fans and provide other cooling and environmental controls especially when you are running the games with the 3D cards; and besides that compute indoors?

    I wouldn't want to take a laptop with me everywhere in order to repel insects; I'll just spend $3.50 on some OFF and smell pine fresh for a few hours to play outdoors.

    --
    I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  118. Question #2 by rushiferu · · Score: 1

    Anyone out there checked to see what frequency range their computer speakers and sound card can accurately reproduce? I'd assume most design specs were made around the human-audible ranges....

    1. Re:Question #2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you've probably seen the answer everywhere. Average young adult hearing can sense sounds from about 30Hz to 20000Hz, though for some it can go as high as 22000Hz. There's something called Shannon's Theorem that simply states that you need twice the sampling rate to reproduce a certain frequency, hence the reason CD's use a 44000Hz sampling rate. Normally this or 48000Hz is also the hardware limit of the DSP's on any given piece of sound hardware.

  119. hmmm by Cynikal · · Score: 1

    now the day he gets that thing to make a sound to repel the RIAA, can someone record an mp3 of it for me to download off of morpheus? i'll play it through my stereo at home and my car deck while i drive around, i promise

  120. Does it work against squirrels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever see squirrels attack tomato plants?

    1. Re:Does it work against squirrels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever see tomato plants attack squirrels?

  121. Cowboy Neal Scaring Lifeforms...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think his large collection of Boy-Band MP3's is to attract a suitable mate. NOT to scare them away ;)

  122. Ummm, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    The following is quoted from (FS609) Ultrasonic and Subsonic Devices for Pest Control by Gerald M. Ghidiu and Louis M. Vasvary, Ph.D. RUTGERS COOPERATIVE EXTENSION, NEW JERSEY AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. (I do not have a URL, but I can email the PDF to any one who wants it)

    (begin quote)
    Scientific evidence shows that most insects, rodents and other animals hear or sense the same range of frequencies that humans do. If a sound or frequency doesn't bother us, it is doubtful that it will bother pests. In many cases, even sounds that bother humans may not bother pests! Further, since gerbils, hamsters, mice and rats are all closely related, anything that irritates unwanted mice and rats will seriously affect pet rodents.

    Testing has shown that sounds emitted by ultrasonic and subsonic devices do not carry far, with about one-half of the energy gone in 15 feet and none remaining at 30 feet. Objects in the path of the sound block the signal create "shadows." Since insects and mice hide behind couches, chairs, refrigerators, etc., these shadows would render the device useless.
    (end quote)

    I used to work in pest control, these devices will work for a short period of time, but most pests will adapt to any set of sound waves you try to use. I watched one company install $800,000 worth of audio repelling devices, only to find mice living in the control box!

    1. Re:Ummm, yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes no sense. The size difference alone mandates that the frequency range is different. Elephants use subsonics, bats use sonar.

      Go back to university and have the cult leaders, errr university officials, offer you some more courses.

  123. Stupid Farang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They only disgusting they eat is your mom's dried out snatch, with lots of fish sauce. mmmmm good

  124. It's not funny. (en tea) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    en tea fuckwad.

  125. Re:MP3s - only licenses. by NeoNormal · · Score: 1

    > And of course, since file-sharing doesn't mean piracy,
    > CowboyNeal owns the CDs, doesn't he.. .

    Well, actually no... according to the RIAA, he only bought licenses to play the music on the CD's that he owns, right?

  126. something like this for linux? by gimpboy · · Score: 2

    is there something like this for linux? it would be nice to take advantage of the pc speaker. especially since i dont really use it for much. i wonder if it would be possible to select which pests to annoy. i have pet rats, but would like to scare off any insects.

    --
    -- john
  127. Linux version of this program looks bogus to me by leto · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I read the CNN article and went to the download site. I downloaded the file from thaiware.com.

    I created a "testuser", chmod a+rw /dev/dsp* and ran the thing. It seems like it's doing absolutely nothing. Though I'm curious was the experts can say about the strace

    Makes you wonder what the Windows version does. Too bad. I could use a working solution :(

  128. Mosquitoes, girlfriends, other annoying critters by Marcos+the+Jackle · · Score: 0

    That's great. I think the next upgrade should repell my girlfriend when I'm looking to have a moment by myself. It's either that or eat more meat, onions and other good gas producing munchies. [burp]

    Mk.

  129. TERRORISTS.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being a large cockroach, I must inform potential users of this software that any attempts to run this program will be considered an act of Terrorism by myself and others of my species. We will band together and file a class action suit.

  130. stick with something that has been verified by mystifying · · Score: 2

    Science News reports (Week of July 13, 2002; Vol. 162, No. 2)

    "Tomato compound repels mosquitos"
    Insect Biotechnology of Durham, N.C., has licensed the tomato compound for new lines of repellents and recently completed tests of an ointment laced with the chemical, now known as IBI-246. Even 12 hours after being applied to a volunteer's arm, it proved 91 percent successful at deterring landings by mosquitoes, notes company president Alan E. Brandt. "More importantly," he told Science News, "in terms of bites, it was 100 percent repellent." In comparison, the company's tests of DEET (N,N-diethyl-meta-toluamide), the active ingredient in many current mosquito repellents, showed that after 12 hours, it inhibited landings by only 78 percent. "

  131. It doesn't work by slycer · · Score: 1

    I tried this app. it didn't work very well at all, I still had mosquitos and pets crowding my workstation.

    The worst part about it is the cord for my headphones that I wear when I'm sitting at my desk keeps getting in my way when I'm trying to swat them.

    1. Re:It doesn't work by Shulai · · Score: 1

      If fact, if this is the same thing I saw a time ago, it didn't emit anything. I ran in with Wine, it didn't call any sound function.
      With an old soundcard that has a mixer program with vu-meter I didn't it generating anything neither.

  132. It wont work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    every good mosquito nerd knows that controlled randomised study have shown those to be inefective. At best you could imitate the female's buzz frequency and attract males.
    Males don't bite.
    At best it can be used to annoy cats/dogs.

    Morpholino

  133. Other possible uses by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it only work on mosquitos and roaches, or will it debug your software as well?

  134. I didnt know they had ears by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    I didnt know insects had ears

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  135. I submitted this news in December... by 1gor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "2001-12-18 22:13:05 Anti-mosquito computer program (articles,news) (rejected)"

    Previous version didn't work on rats through. Maybe that's why...

    --
    --
  136. Speaking of getting rid of bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the hell is the source code?

  137. minnesota by No-op · · Score: 2

    we're especially serious since those damn new yorkers infested this country with the west nile virus. thanks guys!

    --
    EOM
    1. Re:minnesota by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure it came from Canada. ;-)

  138. This is nothing new... by Izanagi · · Score: 1

    It is called a command line prompt.

    --
    SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
  139. The question is... by nmnilsson · · Score: 1

    Does it also repel pets?
    "wsdegb nhkio.l/;", to quote my cat walking over my keyboard to her nap on the, now hairy, printer paper... :-)

    --
    No sig to see here. Move along.
  140. boy band mp3's and american teens..... by clyons · · Score: 1

    Shhhh!!! Don't give those priests ideas!

    --

    --
    Intelligence is definitely a recessive trait.

  141. Oh no! by brink · · Score: 1

    What does it mean if you load the program, hit play, then experience the sudden urge to run away?

    --
    - Jonathan
  142. It works! My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... confirms.

    Just installed this wonderful bug-reppelling wonder and Windows left my computer at once, screaming!

    It's bug-free, now...

  143. Re:You didn't have roaches before,and you still do by The_Sock · · Score: 1

    Please speak in Simpsoneese to explain things on slashdot. It works better.

    ---

    Lisa: "By your logic I could claim that this rock keeps tigers away."

    Homer: "Oh, how does it work?"

    Lisa: "It doesn't work."

    Homer: "Uh-huh."

    Lisa: "It's just a stupid rock."

    Homer: "Uh-huh."

    Lisa: "But I don't see any tigers around, do you?"

    Homer: "Lisa, I want to buy your rock."

    --
    For a good time call www.sawkie.com
  144. c64 basic? Neat, but not THAT hard by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    Yeah, it's cool a third-grader could do that, but I don't think you'd have to be an especially bright 3rd grader to pull it off. I don't know c64 basic, but I do know that in pascal and c++, it only takes a few lines to do this - I can't imagine it would be that much harder on the c64.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  145. wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let me get this straight, it reverse engineers bugs and only works on windows.
    Isn't this a violation of the DMCA?

  146. Apparently they do. by Kedyn's+Crow · · Score: 1

    This article at nature.com talks about insect hearing and sites several interesting examples.

    --
    "The moment "pride" is lost, "freedom" is also lost." - Ramza.
  147. Malaria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "free from the threat of malaria which is
    widespread in Thailand."

    No. In fact, malaria has been almost completely
    erradicated from Thailand. (Of course, that
    doesn't make mosquito bites any less itchy...)

    - Kevin

    1. Re:Malaria by czaby · · Score: 1

      Some border areas still have malaria threat but Bangkok and all the popular tourist places are completely safe.

  148. Uh, hold on... by EdMcMan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "This program produces sound in the range of 16000Hz to 20000Hz which is beyond the audible range of the humans."

    That is from the 'about box'. Last time I checked, the human hearing range was 20Hz to 20000Hz...

  149. Pub Med: studi show ultrasound USELESS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wien Klin Wochenschr 2000 May 19;112(10):448-50

    A blinded, controlled trial of an ultrasound device as mosquito repellent.

    Sylla el-H K, Lell B, Kremsner PG.

    Laboratoire de Recherche, Hopital Albert Schweitzer, Lambarene, Gabon, Federal Republic of Germany.

    Ultrasound emitting devices are used to repel mosquitoes. We tested the repelling properties of a commercially available ultrasound device in a domestic setting in Gabon. Devices emitting three different block frequencies ranging from 3 to 11 kHz were tested in a paired, cross-over blinded and placebo controlled trial during eighteen nights in nine pairs of houses. A total of 7485 mosquitoes (10% Anopheles, 62% Culex, 27% Mansonia and 1% Aedes) were caught, 23 per house per night. There was no significant difference in landing rate between the houses with ultrasound device and the houses with placebo for any species of mosquito. Thus the ultrasound device used was not effective against mosquitoes in this strictly controlled trial.

    A review article:

    Rev Cubana Med Trop 1998;50(2):89-92
    [Electronic repellents against mosquitoes: the propaganda and the reality]
    [Article in Spanish]

    Coro F, Suarez S.

    Facultad de Biologia, Universidad de La Habana, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba.

    A bibliographic review about the use of electroacoustic devices with a supposed repellent action on the females of different species of hematophagous mosquitoes is presented. 15 direct references and 2 indirect ones are given, in which it is concluded that these devices do not protect those who have them from the stings of mosquitoes. The names of 9 of the tested devices as well as of 16 of the main species of mosquitoes present in the field tests are mentioned. These tests have been carried out in very different ecological conditions from Alaska to Equatorial Africa. It is also stressed that the high intensity ultrasonic frequencies emitted by these devices produces a potentially harmful effect on man.

    And another:

    J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1985 Jun;1(2):199-202
    Tests of ultrasonic emissions on mosquito attraction to hosts in a flight
    chamber.

    Foster WA, Lutes KI.

    Department of Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

    Five ultrasonic devices generating fundamental frequencies of 20-70 kHz were tested for their efficacy in repelling mosquitoes. Four species (Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Aedes aegypti, Ae. triseriatus and Haemagogus equinus), were used in a flight chamber in which females must fly upwind against the direction of the sound waves and around the ultrasonic devices to reach a trap downwind of a source of human breath and skin emanations. Repellency was rated by the number of mosquitoes entering the trap during a series of 5 min tests. For all species there was no significant difference between the numbers trapped when the devices were switched on or off, when all devices were tested simultaneously. Tests of individual devices against Ae. aegypti also failed to show a repellent effect.

    Even a cursory search of the relevant medical literature shows that these devices and the program for your computer speaker are useless. I'm always amazed at how easily "31337" programming is taken for practical knowledge.

  150. Programming Skillz no substitute for scholarship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since my one off post got harshly criticized (see under "high frequencies," above), I did /.'s homework for it. A quick search of pub med shows that repeated controlled studies of ultrasonic "repellant" devices have no effect on mosquitos.

    Wien Klin Wochenschr 2000 May 19;112(10):448-50

    A blinded, controlled trial of an ultrasound device as mosquito repellent.

    Sylla el-H K, Lell B, Kremsner PG.

    Laboratoire de Recherche, Hopital Albert Schweitzer, Lambarene, Gabon, Federal Republic of Germany.

    Ultrasound emitting devices are used to repel mosquitoes. We tested the repelling properties of a commercially available ultrasound device in a domestic setting in Gabon. Devices emitting three different block frequencies ranging from 3 to 11 kHz were tested in a paired, cross-over blinded and placebo controlled trial during eighteen nights in nine pairs of houses. A total of 7485 mosquitoes (10% Anopheles, 62% Culex, 27% Mansonia and 1% Aedes) were caught, 23 per house per night. There was no significant difference in landing rate between the houses with ultrasound device and the houses with placebo for any species of mosquito. Thus the ultrasound device used was not effective against mosquitoes in this strictly controlled trial.

    A review article:

    Rev Cubana Med Trop 1998;50(2):89-92
    [Electronic repellents against mosquitoes: the propaganda and the reality]
    [Article in Spanish]

    Coro F, Suarez S.

    Facultad de Biologia, Universidad de La Habana, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba.

    A bibliographic review about the use of electroacoustic devices with a supposed repellent action on the females of different species of hematophagous mosquitoes is presented. 15 direct references and 2 indirect ones are given, in which it is concluded that these devices do not protect those who have them from the stings of mosquitoes. The names of 9 of the tested devices as well as of 16 of the main species of mosquitoes present in the field tests are mentioned. These tests have been carried out in very different ecological conditions from Alaska to Equatorial Africa. It is also stressed that the high intensity ultrasonic frequencies emitted by these devices produces a potentially harmful effect on man.

    And another:

    J Am Mosq Control Assoc 1985 Jun;1(2):199-202
    Tests of ultrasonic emissions on mosquito attraction to hosts in a flight
    chamber.

    Foster WA, Lutes KI.

    Department of Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

    Five ultrasonic devices generating fundamental frequencies of 20-70 kHz were tested for their efficacy in repelling mosquitoes. Four species (Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Aedes aegypti, Ae. triseriatus and Haemagogus equinus), were used in a flight chamber in which females must fly upwind against the direction of the sound waves and around the ultrasonic devices to reach a trap downwind of a source of human breath and skin emanations. Repellency was rated by the number of mosquitoes entering the trap during a series of 5 min tests. For all species there was no significant difference between the numbers trapped when the devices were switched on or off, when all devices were tested simultaneously. Tests of individual devices against Ae. aegypti also failed to show a repellent effect.

    Even a cursory search of the relevant medical literature shows that these devices and the program for your computer speaker are useless. I'm always amazed at how easily "31337" programming is taken for practical knowledge.

  151. Program works like Pet OFFense box? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    I have to wonder does this program to turn a computer into pest repellant work like this device shown on this web page:

    http://www.youcansave.com/pestoffense.html?AID=5 46 3330&PID=1060337

    Mind you, the way Pest OFFense works looks to be different than what that program does to your computer. (shrug)

  152. Corrected name by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    Whoops--the message header should say Pest OFFense. (blush)

  153. Anti-MAL is VERY annoying to my ears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just tried this program Anti-Mal. I could hear the all 3 types of sounds the program emitted from my speakers. Its no where near faintly audible, its down-right annoying. It sounded like a million crickets in hyper mode, with a bit of a higher pitch.

    You'd have to be def to not hear the sounds Anti-Mal puts out!

  154. They include a Linux binary.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..but I don't see any reason to even check this program out since there's no source code. Ugh.

  155. soundcard limits by AlecX · · Score: 1

    Even really "good" speakers cannot compensate for the limits of your soundcard.

    The _highest_ frequency that a soundcard can produce is one-half of it's maximum sampling rate output. For must of us, that implies (44,100 * 1/2) = 22.05 kHz, which is not far outside the "average" upper limit of human hearing (20 kHz).

    If you paid alot for your soundcard, you may be able to produce 24 kHz sounds (which, most likely, your speakers can't reproduce, your amplifier can't amplify, and you couldn't hear anyway).

    I dont think there are any commercial speakers with a frequency response beyond 22kHz (yet), and most dont get past 20. Several companies are working on small piezoelectrics that will, at which point we will need better $oundcards and new $tereo $ystems.

    The following article may be informative in this respect: Humans can't distinguish anything higher than 20 kHz, but...

    -alec
    Composer of "Music for 16 DogWhistles" (which uses a motif from Cage's 4'33")

  156. warrior instinct? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    (* you should try this on each other rather than some poor animals, anyone who finds this amusing is a waste of oxygen anyway. dont let mom catch you doing it she might spank you. *)

    As much as I hate to admit it, when I was younger I sometimes found such things highly amuzing.

    I think there is a warrior instinct that occures in puberty that makes one fascinated about such things.

    Fortunately for the world, I don't like to watch such things anymore. I don't like roller coaster anymore either, for that matter. (Even when I was a teenager, I was mostly a bystander to such torture events.....except for letting the dog lick peanut-butter off of a 9V battery.)

    Hmmmm. I wonder what Klingon teenagers do for fun.

    1. Re:warrior instinct? by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Hmmmm. I wonder what Klingon teenagers do for fun.

      Well I guess many die out of school pranks... But then the perpetrators are caught and executed in front of the whole school.

      I dunno, maybe Im wrong, dont really like Star Trek that much (not enough Klingons, too much soap)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  157. Not similar at all, AFAIK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brainwave Generator uses a method known as binaural beats to coax the brain into different predominant brainwave patterns (it's also worth noting that this has been proven to work when used properly).

    Due to the nature of binaural beats (it's a stereo effect that requires headphones), it's impossible that this program utilizes them to repel insects and such (assuming it even works).

  158. There IS a linux version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just download the anti mos program ,a href="http://download.thaiware.com/program4/antimo sz.zip">here, unzip it.

    It includes a
    win32 GUI program
    win32 text mode program
    linux program (i assume its text)

    Hope this helps

  159. ooops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  160. you're by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your != you're

  161. Well I just tried it out on a UK midge by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

    (pronounced mid-gee) and it had no effect at all, it sat looking at my screen as I fiddled with the frequency control, and didn't move a millimetre.

    Perhaps British midges are made of sterner stuff than Indian mozzies?

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    1. Re:Well I just tried it out on a UK midge by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they don't speak Thai?

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  162. This stuff really works by danpbrowning · · Score: 2

    I'm not kidding, this type of stuff really works for some things. For example, we used to see 5-7 spiders/day in our house, and after getting the ones from costco, we now see 2-3 per month! It is wonderful.

    --
    Daniel
  163. Again with the useless commentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CmdrTaco,

    Again with the vapid comments posted as a follow up to an article. Not only does it display your over-inflated ego, it is extremely unprofessional. Frankly, I find your comments banal and boring. I had hoped that you would have more respect for your readership, but you don't. It is time to contact VA Software to complain about your lack of professionalism and disdain for your customer.

    FYI: LNUX at $0.69 must be substantially lower than your strike price of the options you were given. What was it like when you used to be rich. . . on paper?

  164. Re:And where do mosquitoes, cockroaches and rats g by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

    Wiggum:"Aw Cinnamon, don't make this harder then it already is!"

    --
    Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  165. people kill people ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Well, if the frequency gets too high it might scare some people away too ... but never forget, speakers or sounds don't kill people; people kill people :)

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  166. I don't believe this. by Bartmoss · · Score: 1

    Sounds like something they would sell in Spam... "as seen on cnn". Buy two and get some herbal viagra for free.

  167. No, but it works in pet stores with a laptop... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    Yes, I was a very, very sick and demented child.

  168. Mating call by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

    A better virus would be one that makes a mating call out through your speakers when it infects your computer...in no time would you attract horny little critters. Though one would have to find out mating calls that: a) us humans can't hear, b) require time-of-year stats(call play period), and c) are most receptive to certain species(read most horny)

    BTW, Duck/bird hunters use whistles that make such calls to ease their hunting. Take this with a grain of salt 'cause I saw it on some TV show I can't remember(Simpsons?).

  169. Yeah, right, as if a PC speaker produces >20kHz by femto · · Score: 1

    It's unlikely the frequency response of the crappy speakers attached to most computers will extend to ultrasonic frequencies. Result: you can toggle bits in your sound card as fast as you want, but you will get no output from your speaker above a few kilohertz.

  170. Shameless Windows jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Too bad the bugs will still come in through the Windows!

    2) So I guess this eliminates the need for debugging my code anymore?

    Laugh, dammit, it's funny... :)

  171. Re:Attract the mosquitoes - Dry Ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Throw a block of dry ice in the corner of your yard for your next cookout. Mosquitoes will get drunk in the CO2 smoke and leave you alone all night.

  172. Ultrasonic is an unproven method by krylan · · Score: 1

    There is no scientific evidence that ultrasonic can/will repel pests.
    We MIGHT be able to say in the least that some pests are temporarly annoyed, however they easily adjust.

    pest control article mentioning ultrasonic

    --

    ...I could be wrong

  173. You don't believe it? by MotherErich · · Score: 0

    So are you agree or disagreeing with my previous comment?

    --
    You have to be smarter than the machine you're working with.