Slashdot Mirror


Windows XP Tablet PC Edition

WallsRSolid writes "Microsoft just finished a week-long series of lectures and demos at my university, and the product that really stole the show was the Tablet PC. I was in a room with probably 150 hardcore linux users, and it seemed to me that the demonstration just floored them (the entire lecture hall CHEERED a Microsoft product). I believe that Microsoft's own online hype literature is insufficient in describing just how powerful their Tablet concept is. A July preview, Acer's propaganda, a press release about their initial success, and a behind-the-scenes account (good article) of the enabling technology. Oh, and the input stylus is electromagnetic, not pressure-sensing, ANY document (not just MS) can be annotated, and the journal software is AMAZING in its power and flexibility."

508 comments

  1. unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft came out with something that Linux fans cheered for? Yeah right...

    1. Re:unbelievable by The+J+Kid · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news:

      Microsoft (MSIE) has just released a beta version of there upcoming Human Resource Management tool, called MS Brainwash 2003. It's said to give offices serious productivity spurs and makes office meetings a breeze. The product is expeced to release around sping 2003.

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    2. Re:unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Just your basic Astroturfer at work. Who do you think submitted this "article" to begin with? You actually belive this guy knows 1linux user, let alone 150 of of us?

      This is just another of MicroSoft's "Manufactured" adovactes. In fact the person who submitted it most likely is an employee of one of the PR firms Microsoft uses.

    3. Re:unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You fags just can't accept the fact that they can produce some good products once in a while? Anytime something remotely pro-microsoft shows up on this website, it's immediately shot down with cries of "they work for the Great Satan!!"

      You penis-lickers make me sick.

    4. Re:unbelievable by Xi · · Score: 1

      Can you spell sarcasm?

    5. Re:unbelievable by bergeron76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I believe that Microsoft's own online hype literature is insufficient in describing just how powerful their Tablet concept is.

      Oh, and the input stylus is electromagnetic, not pressure-sensing, ANY document (not just MS) can be annotated, and the journal software is AMAZING in its power and flexibility.

      Whatever makes you think that this comment was submitted by a Microsoft promoter?

      Could it be the fact that he was able to pick out the 150 linux users in the crowd and knew that they were "floored" by the Tablet PC demo?

      This submission has stink written all over it. Good call.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    6. Re:unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite frankly, though we all have differing opinions, I am gettign pretty sick of the blanket M$ bashing.

      It is surprising that such intelligent persons can have such small minded ways and a lack of rational discussion.

      Actually, I place the blame on moderators modding up so many stupid comments as funny, insightful and interesting. It seems that most of you do not realize that without M$, the internet and daily computing would be nothing like it is now.

    7. Re:unbelievable by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      check the document for hidden tags, maybe it's written by valerie malinson

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    8. Re:unbelievable by noshellswill · · Score: 0

      Linux FAN ...? That's f-a-n ?? An OS is a tool, dweezle, like a fork or enema bag --- WTF ... back to the closet, dweezle and take your meds.

    9. Re:unbelievable by GreatDave · · Score: 1

      The Linux fans cheered this technology because it probably wouldn't be hard to de-WinCEXP it. KDE 3 or fluxbox and that nifty electromagnetic pen thingy? Niiiiiice. Let Bill keep making the gadgets and let us keep hacking it, I say. Less Redmond money spent on DRM and evil things.

      --
      "I am root. Bow before me." To this I say, "You are root, and you bear the sins of the world upon your shoulders."
    10. Re:unbelievable by Shelled · · Score: 2
      Don't read this as personal, but I find it difficult to unravel the multiple ironies of your post and its current moderation.


      - Though I agree blanket MS bashing is counter-productive and infantile, by phrasing it as a blanket bash against Slashdot and its readers you risk the same.
      - Your post takes to task Slashdot moderators as anti-MS goons, yet those same moderators are modding up your mildly anti-Slashdot, pro-MS post.
      - The things you say about MS are at best highly debatable, yet again those same moderators currently have your AC post at +3 'Insightful' (I would love to hear how MS has made the Internet so much better, or how much smaller the computing world would be today had the standards been Apple and Netscape or real competition.)

      I agree, the moderation on Slashdot could be a whole lot better and simplistic MS bashing without substantive argument to back it up is a waste of bandwidth, but the way to fix it isn't simply doing the same from the opposite side of the fence.

    11. Re:unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • Microsoft (MSIE)
      I think you meant MSFT , the symbol, not MSIE, the browser.
    12. Re:unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I can spell that word.

    13. Re:unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like Linux and am a hardcore Linux user. But I also like Windows XP. Plus, you wouldn't have to work to hard to get me to lick your cock.

    14. Re:unbelievable by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      No they didnt.. tablet PC's have been around for decades... and this STUPID idea of using a special pen instead of a touch screen is pure stupidity... I have several decades old tablet PC's that use the "special pen" and they completely suck compared to the Fujitsu Point 510's that use a regualy touchscren so you can use a plastic stylus or your finger...

      Microsoft isnt innovating crap... they are trying to once again sell something that has been around forever.

      you want one? go to ebay and search for pen pc or touchscreen pc.
      get one for $100 to $1500.00 depending on processor and features...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I like Linux and am a hardcore Linux user. But I also like Windows XP. Plus, you wouldn't have to work to hard to get me to lick your cock.

      Proof Positive that Linux is for fags.

      Go suck your own, you ass-pirate!

    16. Re:unbelievable by brain159 · · Score: 1

      "... and then you go and spoil it all by saying something stupid like 'M$'"!

    17. Re:unbelievable by ScottKin · · Score: 1

      What do you expect when /. is now nothing more than a web-based "hang-out" for |337 sKriP7 K|ddi3z wH0 th|ink th3y'r3 c00| b3cAu53 th3y run LINUX on their Daddy's PC, or screwed-up mental degenerates who get-off on scatological humor? The moderation system is severely lacking, MS bashing wastes bandwidth because it becomes a Linux-lover's mosh-pit when someone starts bashing Microsoft, as if it's "c00|" to do what everyone else is doing.

      Let's look at some hard facts:

      1) Microsoft has poured *MILLIONS* of dollars into Apple to help Microsoft's #1 customer with Software Development (can you say "Office"?).

      2) Microsoft has brought *MILLIONS* of people, directly (via MSN) and/or indirectly (the inclusion of the TCP/IP stack into Windows), to the Internet. More web developers/designers *might* be using Apple systems to develop their content, and *NIX is the undisputed leader in Web Server population...but Web Servers and Developers don't generate page-hits...USERS DO!

      3) When the PC industry started to embrace this thing we call "networking", the Intel/MS segment of the industry embraced practically *every* networking protocol and standard (and some of that embracing was fairly embarrasing...anyone remember "10Net"?)...and Apple had "AppleTalk".

      4) If it wasn't for *NIX in all of it's flavors, you wouldn't have the Internet as it is today.

      5) You *can* like Linux AND Microsoft and still be "c00|".

      You may not like Microsoft because of their business tactics. You may not like Microsoft because IYHO their products don't make the cut. If you take a cold, hard look at the HISTORY of the PC Industry and it's effect on Computing in general, you might even consider cutting Mr. Gates and Microsoft some slack. Microsoft could have let Apple continue in it's downward spiral a few years ago and keep that US$150Million, but they saw the worth in getting Apple out of financial "intensive care".

      Just an FYI: I cut my teeth on BSD before it was BSD when I worked at Lawrence Berkeley Lab's Computer Center, operating PDP-11/70's, 11/34's and VAXes back in 1979. I made VisiCalc spreadsheets for businesses back in the late 70's / very-early 80's on Apple IIe's. I coveted an Apple Lisa/20 about 20 years ago. I worked for Microsoft on-and-off as an Independent Contractor on several high-visibility products. I run WindowsXP, Windows 2000 Advanced Server and FreeBSD at my home office. I'm planning on buying some "surplus" SGI boxes in the next six months or so. Why do I say all of this? To explain that I *don't* have any "OS Loyalties" - I use what OS I think best fits the job needed. I can't play Deus Ex on my FreeBSD box. I think, in many ways, Xwindows is superior to MS-Windows. Apple is the best box and OS X is the best OS for Graphic Arts and Multimedia.

      You *can* have it all!

      ScottKin

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
    18. Re:unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innovation or not, Microsoft is pulling in billions, and there is no end to it in sight. Everyone else here seems to know exactly what the consumer wants, then why don't you go push your material and put Microsoft out of business? Most businesses like Microsoft, I personally do not like Microsoft, but I also do not like to bash Microsoft. This industry would not be where it is without them.

    19. Re:unbelievable by ScottKin · · Score: 1

      Yeah - I remember those "Tablet" PC's.

      NEC Had one back in 1993 - sucked.

      c|net raved about some in 1996 - where are they?

      Comdex went nuts about them in 1998...1999...2000...I see none of them on the market.

      GooRoo - http://www.go-gooroo.com/ - anything on the sensors on this, Mr. Spock?

      QBE - http://www.aqcessnet.com/ - It's soooo BIG!

      The Fuji 510's are nice, but since they're Win95-era boxes they're kinda limited (Max. RAM = 56MB).

      It's a nice idea - but practical?

      ScottKin

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
    20. Re:unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am NOT a faggot! I just like to lick cocks sometimes. No one likes you. Go kill yourself you worthless nerd.

    21. Re:unbelievable by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

      It was more of a sarcastic irony...

  2. Re:destroy the system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Let it break down on its own, it's more fun to watch.

    +1, Somewhat Good FP

  3. Actually a new business-model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    1: Write free software.
    2: ?
    3: Make proprietary software.
    4: Profit!

    1. Re:Actually a new business-model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shallow minded troll... the code is largely written.. gates rode the SW wave, now it flows back to HW.. really, the west needs to properly re-embarce HW and services based business models.. paying the microsoft tax is laughable and it wont hold water for much longer.. teachers, keep on teachin', and better check your pension allocations!

    2. Re:Actually a new business-model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1: Write free software.
      2: ?
      3: Make proprietary software.
      3.5: Watch others clone your propeitary software with free-software.
      4: ?

    3. Re:Actually a new business-model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What tax is that. You get a product and you pay for it, just like everyone else on the planet.

    4. Re:Actually a new business-model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3.4 Take patents. ...
      3.6 Sue free software developers.
      4: PROFIT!

    5. Re:Actually a new business-model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I forgot to pay for my Linux software.

      Do you have an address I can send my check to
      like everyone else on the planet?

    6. Re:Actually a new business-model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who have developed Linux has CHOOSEN to give it away for free. Ford, for example, has choosen to NOT giving cars away for free.

      The fact that you have to pay for various stuff does not make it a tax.

    7. Re:Actually a new business-model! by brain159 · · Score: 2

      They've choosen to give it away, you say? Could you explain what that's all aboot?

  4. waiting with bated breath by GlassUser · · Score: 1

    From what I've seen, this is simply amazing. I'm going to a preview of this tomorrow. My uptight boss was all for it once she saw what it was about. I've held off a laptop purchase for almost a year now waiting for this.

    1. Re:waiting with bated breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed.

      However, ive been to quite a few microsoft "gatherings" such as this over the years, and I have no doubt that this will too go the way of Blackbird, because *they all do*.

      Incredible innovation, amazing ideas, interpolability, interoperability, smooth heterogeniality, amazing functionality, breathtaking eyecandy spawning cheers and loose bladders in the audience/testbed...

      But when its actually released, it will have very little to do with what anyone saw, and will of course be amputated, disabled, slowed down, and will only talk to other crappy microsoft products.

      Thats what always happens. Best not to get too excited; thinking for a moment that microsoft will *ever* sell an innovative, useful object is sheer folly.

    2. Re:waiting with bated breath by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Yep, I hate M$ as much as any other /.er I use Linux as my only desktop OS but the tablet-pc and especially the combined tablet-pc/normal notebook ones have me drooling non-stop

      I think most people are still faster at writing with a pen than a keyboard and even if that's not the case the possibility to add a few sketches or make annotations without the limitations of a keyboard-based app is a system-seller

      Now if it'd only come with Linux optional =)

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    3. Re:waiting with bated breath by Pengo · · Score: 2

      Must say, with the SQL Server 7.0 release... about the same thing happened. I still believe that SQL Server is ms's finest product, but I can't run it on my Favorite OS... and up until the days of FreeTDS interfaces, nothing could talk to it.. including java. (unless you used that rediculous ODBC bridge)...

      Anyway, after only one installation, never really had the chance to play with it since.. Great DB, too bad it's caged to one OS.. I would choose it ANY day over oracle if it ran on linux.

    4. Re:waiting with bated breath by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Interesting
      My uptight boss was all for it once she saw what it was about. I've held off a laptop purchase for almost a year now waiting for this.


      This, boys and girls, is exactly the reason Microsoft is so successful. More power to them. When was the last time you heard the average person waiting with baited breath for Red Hat 8.0 to come out? "Look! It now supports a new video card that shipped in my machine 12 months ago! Woohoo!" :-)

      Not a flame, just an observation. Microsoft really knows how to stir up the troops and get them excited over nothing but cybercrack. Open your wallets folks and enjoy the ride, I sure do.

    5. Re:waiting with bated breath by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1


      I think most people are still faster at writing with a pen than a keyboard


      Are you serious? Maybe people who are hunt-and-peckers, but even BAD touch typists type 30 words a minute. No way someone could do that writing longhand.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    6. Re:waiting with bated breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HUH? I can name at least 100 people who waited with baited breath for RedHat 8.

      You obviosly know no Penguinistas.

      I want to call you an idiot, but I am a nice guy.

    7. Re:waiting with bated breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can name you 100 people who waited with baited breath for freedos 8, what's your point? Thousands and thousands and thosands wait for a new ms product, handfull of people get all exicted over a new release of redhat

    8. Re:waiting with bated breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I waited too, until Jaguar got out for my PowerBook. Seems that MS is behind Apple again - and getting again more reward for it!

    9. Re:waiting with bated breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must write very slowly and have no concept of abbrvtn.

    10. Re:waiting with bated breath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if this is still true, but microsoft was sued by sybase because microsoft 'stole' sql server from them. I believe that part of the settlement is that microsoft can't create a unix version of sql server. what you really want is a copy of sybase. there is a free( as in beer ) version of sybase for linux here . I've worked with both sybase and sql server, and i'd hate to admit it, but i like sql server 2k better, if only for the fact that sql2k supports varchar(8k) fields, and sybase only supports varchar(255).

    11. Re:waiting with bated breath by RustyTaco · · Score: 1

      You must type very slowly and havn't realized that you can type abreviations just as well as you can write them, and get the same time savings. More than that, if you really want you can setup the software on the computer to take your abreviations to spell them out completely so when you're done you have a message readable by anybody without any effort. With handwritten abreviations the reader will have to slow down and figure out what you meant by that incomplete chicken scratch unless they're familiar with your shorthand.

      - RustyTaco

  5. But is it open? by CoolQ · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah, it's a great idea. But is it typical Microshit? Have they actually published the necessary technical information for linux to be ported to it? Somehow I don't think so. --Quentin

    1. Re:But is it open? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why would they?

    2. Re:But is it open? by James+Skarzinskas · · Score: 2

      I'm not trolling when I say "Why would they, and why should they?". It's their product, and they are free to disclose as much or as little of the technical information as they wish.

    3. Re:But is it open? by Ponty · · Score: 1

      Holy moly. Are you feeling dizzy?

      First of all, Microsoft is a software company (note the glee of the Apple critics on this front), so they don't so much have to think about installing Linux. Maybe you should be bitching about Acer or someone.

      And anyway, as a software company that's making this new software that seems to have people excited, why should they give a whit about publishing anything to do with another operating system?

      Even more than that, I'm as big a MS basher as the next guy, but shit. I wouldn't expect them to publish anything of the sort and I'd reserve the harsh light of my scrutiny for when they screw up outside of normally accepted business practices (and you won't have to wait long.) To do otherwise makes you look like a zealot.

  6. hmmm by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do believe the earth just ripped open, pigs have wings, and it might just be me, but it's awful cold down here....

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Don't take this story at face value. I was soo there, and the description given is quite embellished. First, there weren't 150 people there let alone linux geeks. Most of the 'linux geeks' were in fact just random people there for the free food (which was in fact very good), and other free stuff they were giving away. Also, the presenters were alums, so the cheering may very well have been just for them. Doom.

  7. Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by tiltowait · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tablet PCs are touch screens with handwriting recognition that run software just like a desktop personal computer. Early designs have been released and the first generation of models are expected to hit the market in late 2002. read and learn more.

    1. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 3, Informative

      [...] Early designs have been released and the first generation of models are expected to hit the market in late 2002.

      Uh, no. The IBM ThinkPad 710 was out in 1993, and it featured an electromagnetic stylus. Once again, no innovation whatsoever on part of Microsoft.

    2. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The whole innovation behind this has nothing to do with the electrostatic input device. MSoft is not in the business of sensors. Plenty of devices have had these kinds of input screens.

      IBM just used it ala mouse-input. Microsoft is allowing people to use digital ink as a first class citizen in the computing world. It's a whole new way of looking at computing.

      TabletPC is not some sort of handwriting recognition on steroids, it is a way of combining standard text with ink-based input, and allowing you to freely go between the two without effort.

    3. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      IBM just used it ala mouse-input. Microsoft is allowing people to use digital ink as a first class citizen in the computing world. It's a whole new way of looking at computing.

      I don't speak marketing weaselese, so I don't know what "digital ink" is, but IBM had a little application that let you write with the stylus in say, a text entry box, and it would convert it to text on the fly. I'm also pretty sure Apple Newton did the same thing, and before that a research group in Stanford was developing similar principles. A whole new way of looking at computing? I think not.

    4. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by dizco · · Score: 0

      IBM just used it ala mouse-input. Microsoft is allowing people to use digital ink as a first class citizen in the computing world. It's a whole new way of looking at computing.

      What your pet dog, named 'Ink' hears:

      blah blah blah blah blah blah-blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah INK! blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

    5. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks you need to lookup the definition of "innovation." Then, perhaps the definition of "zealot."

    6. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BM just used it ala mouse-input. Microsoft is allowing people to use digital ink as a first class citizen in the computing world. It's a whole new way of looking at computing.
      >
      >
      Umm...no. Take a look at the touch pads/UPC scanners drivers for UPS and other delivery companies have been using for the past few years. You basically sign the pad to accept delivery of the item after the driver scans the UPC code on the package.

      Microsoft hasn't come up with anything new here whatsoever. Only a fool and a liar would claim otherwise.

    7. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you're right. I'm sure the TP 710 did everything the new MS Tablet PCs will. Silly MS, no innovation whatsoever. *rolleyes*

    8. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont know, but it just sounds really really stupid to me.. so what, the screen flips around so you can hand write stuff. i saw a little thing about it on msnbc a while back, and a lady was like "its great if you dont like typing and want to send your employees messages in your own handwriting.." big fucking deal! you think your employees really want to read your crapy handwriting instead of the universally readable typed out version? tablet pc's are for snots. i personally know there's no way i can write by hand faster than i can type.

    9. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by lboxman · · Score: 1

      "The first generation"? I have a Fujitsu tablet that was made sometime in the late 1990s. Among tablet PC fans, this tablet is considered second generation. These tablet PCs are really more like 3rd or 4th generation, they are just the first ones to be marketed widely rather than to specific niche markets, such as the medical field. Also, my tablet can do most of the things that the new tablets can do (document annotation, etc.)

      --
      Regexes are like cocaine. The first hit is pretty good, but afterwards you try to use them to solve all your problems.
    10. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by tshak · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Could we please stop mod'n brainless zealots up?

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    11. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, and you could detach the Thinkpad's monitor (without minor surgery) and take it into another room and wirelessly continue to use it. It seems to me they've had this on on Star Trek for a lot longer than that, but it could be me. Of course, ST's not reality, now is it?

      And, of course, you could run all of your PC applications on the Apple Newton. I'm sure you're convinced that back then you could hack it and somehow get it to run X86 code?

      And, Linux is a completely new way of computing... You create an OS based on many commercial and collegiate products, you make it run on your PC because you can't afford to buy a computer that typically runs unix. Then you write a bunch of software that is almost a complete copy of everything available for unix. Then linux software continues to "evolve" and a bunch of software that is a direct clone of Windows software is created. Most of this is distributed as "open source" freeware that prevents anyone from using it in a commercial product without releasing all of their source code (because, clearly it is innovation that can't and shouldn't be incorporated into anything that is sold). With the craving for free stuff (and if it's not currently free, write your own and distribute it for free) people are striving for some real innovation. Trying to sabotage the commercial software industry they work for! HUH??! Why would you do that?

      Companies that sell products they've spent countless hours developing get to see the open source community "innovate" by cloning their software and giving it away?!? There seems to be an alterior motive there that is not completely stable. It's one thing to give away software using code that you've entirely developed, but if you clone someone else's GUI's or someone else's file formats... Are you violating their copyright? They can't use your stuff in their source code without releasing all of their source code, but you can reverse engineer or clone their stuff and openly distribute it?1?!

      I'll buy the whole anti-Microsoft BS this forum tends to attract when Linux actually begins to widely innovate. What the heck is so new about creating a glorified unix emulator to run unix and emulated windows programs?

      On the other hand, instead of MINDLESSLY flaming Microsoft, again and again, you COULD write a free way to run it (the tablet PC hardware) in Linux, as well as reverse engineer Microsoft's "digital ink", that way you could buy the product, which you probably want regardless of what you'll publicly say on this forum, and use it in your house to write idiotic comments on /. with which, is of course, your freedom of choice. You can write them in any OS you want to! That way you can brag to your friends that you "hacked" (cloned copyrighted software) a Microsoft product and are nearing completion of the next open source product that will drive M$ out of business!

      And of course, all the common folk will come flocking to you (for free) and ignore all of that Multi-billion dollar corporation BS from Microsoft... that is, of course, until you're a day late in getting out of beta. Plus, now that you've driven Microsoft out of business we can just all build our own proprietary platforms and not have to worry about those stupid standards that have made PCs so cheap to tinker with.

      That would be a heck of a new way to look at computing! Shut the hell up!

    12. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by GlenRaphael · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Microsoft is allowing people to use digital ink as a first class citizen in the computing world. It's a whole new way of looking at computing.

      Bill Gates rolls out the "Tablet PC" concept every few years at his CES presentations, and it's always been a minor reinvention of the Apple Newton presented as if Microsoft had thought of it on their own. Reflowable "ink text" could be used almost everywhere on the Newton that you could use printed text. There are a few fun new features in Tablet PC but nothing I've seen justifies the "whole new way of looking at computing" rhetoric. However, even if the core ideas aren't original, they are still important. I'm glad somebody with deep pockets is reinventing the Newton Notepad concept because it was a really great way to take notes and Apple seems to have abandoned the technology.

      Oh, and about that electromagnetic sensor: Early researchers in pen computing noticed that when peaple write on a large pad of paper they tend to rest the heel of their hand on it. This interferes with accurate touch-screen input and is why the AT&T Eo and the tablet-sized prototype Newton called "Bic" and other early attempts at large-screen recognition used electromagnetic input.

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
    13. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Right on, man.

      For once it was worth trawling below 2 to read a comment.

    14. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by cmeans · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Don't forget about the Compaq Concerto. I've still got mine...a wonderful machine that ran Pen Windows (an OEM'd extension of Windows v3.1), but it was possible to upgrade it to Win95 without too much trouble. (It was even a small feature of the movie Die Hard 3...remeber the machine controlling the bomb in the park?)

    15. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's a nice, big photograph of the TP 710T for moderators who modded this as a troll. I have a 710T at home.

    16. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by leiz · · Score: 2

      Don't forget the Crosspads with IBM's handwriting recognition software.

    17. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Xerox?

    18. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by bmw · · Score: 1

      Companies that sell products they've spent countless hours developing get to see the open source community "innovate" by cloning their software and giving it away?!? There seems to be an alterior motive there that is not completely stable. It's one thing to give away software using code that you've entirely developed, but if you clone someone else's GUI's or someone else's file formats... Are you violating their copyright? They can't use your stuff in their source code without releasing all of their source code, but you can reverse engineer or clone their stuff and openly distribute it?1?!

      You seem to be a bit confused. Both sides are perfectly free to reverse engineer or clone the other's stuff but neither side is allowed to use the other's source code without agreeing to the terms of its license. There is a very big difference between using somebody else's code for something and writing code to do that same thing yourself. I suggest you ponder this distinction.

    19. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 2, Funny

      IBM just used it ala mouse-input. Microsoft is allowing people to use digital ink as a first class citizen in the computing world. It's a whole new way of looking at computing.

      Didn't they fire you for those falsified 'switch' promotions? You should perhaps quit drinking the digital ink.

      Remember kids, service guarantees citizenship!

    20. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      What the heck is so new about creating a glorified unix emulator to run unix and emulated windows programs?

      What the heck is so great about a Newton emulator running an operating system that emulates the Macintosh?

      Writing this kind of tripe is easy, you dork.

      The above post is either a troll or the crazed rambling of a zealot; moderate accordingly.

    21. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by funwithstuff · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm glad somebody with deep pockets is reinventing the Newton Notepad concept because it was a really great way to take notes and Apple seems to have abandoned the technology.

      No, they just ditched the Newton. The handwriting recognition is alive and well in Mac OS X 10.2 (Jaguar), rechristened "Inkwell". Works in any app, using a Wacom tablet. Apple would be well placed to do a tablet of their own if they want to - anyone for a Powerbook without a lid?

      --
      it's not about the karma, it's about the whuffie
    22. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as it has a keyboard jack, and can accept a keyboard - some cheapskapes do anything to weasel down product cost

    23. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like your own comment? !!! You only have an initial score of a 1.

    24. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I always check off 'No Score +1 Bonus' unless I have something really relevant to say. Sadly, few others seem to do so. It has the added bonus that if what I say is considered important, someone marks it up and I get 'more karma'.

    25. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      Bill Gates rolls out the "Tablet PC" concept every few years at his CES presentations, and it's always been a minor reinvention of the Apple Newton presented as if Microsoft had thought of it on their own. Reflowable

      You just don't get it. The Newton was a piece of crud that failed because the technology was crap. Doonesbury and Scott Adams were not being unfair in their cartoons, 'Weave me a cone you cupid bat' is much closer to the intended text than most newton users ever got.

      Bill keeps comming back to the tablet PC idea because he wants one. That is the reason why Microsoft does most of the things it does, his Billship has thought something is kewl and should exist at an affordable price.

      Examples in the hardware area include the 'natural' keyboard and the force feedback joystick. These both existed before Gates pushed Microsoft into making them but they were expensive nich market products.

      Most engineering is incremental development rather than a paradigm shift. Applying the same logic as is applied by the slashweenies, one could claim that Tim B-L only improved Ted Nelson's ideas in Xanadu. But this ignores the fact that Xanadu was unusuable and never even got to market in any form. Tim made major contributions that were critical to making the thing work.

      Apple failed in a way many Microsoft competitors fail, they pumped too much of their research dollars into science fiction projects and too little into incremental development of their platform. From sacking Jobs through to rehiring him Apple was asleep at the switch on MacOS, even though protected memory and decent multitasking were clearly needed desperately.

      Finaly, nobody seems to fault Lotus for buying in Notes from Iris who had originaly bought the technology from DEC.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    26. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by laptop006 · · Score: 1

      So THAT's the box I've got the KB for...
      Do you know if it's PS/2?

      --
      /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
    27. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by cmeans · · Score: 2
      Yes, it seems like a standard PS/2 connection, however, I've not been able to get both a keyboard and mouse to work at the same time using a splitter. I didn't try too hard, so that doesn't mean it's not possible.

    28. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by WNight · · Score: 2

      Win95 is better on a P4 than on a 486 but we don't attribute that gain to Microsoft.

      If their Tablet PC is any better it's simply because technology has enabled better handwriting recognition.

      This is precisely Microsoft innovation. They release the same product that other companies have (usually after buying those companies or suing them out of business and buying the parts) and claim to have invented it. Microsoft claimed that Doublespace was an *INNOVATION*, even when the court case with Stacker, for them outright stealing 100% of it, was in progress.

      That's the only real MS innovation.

    29. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by GlenRaphael · · Score: 2
      I'm glad somebody with deep pockets is reinventing the Newton Notepad concept because it was a really great way to take notes and Apple seems to have abandoned the technology.

      No, they just ditched the Newton. The handwriting recognition is alive and well in Mac OS X

      For me, the important part of the Newton Notepad was not really the handwriting recognition, it was the idea of a free-form notetaking environment in which one can fluidly edit and mix multiple kinds of information (recognized text, reflowable ink text, recognized shapes and sketch ink). The best part was the set of editing gestures that let one use a stylus alone - no buttons! - to fluidly move things around, copy, cut, paste, insert and delete. My biggest disappointment when I saw BillG's COMDEX keynote was when I saw him pop up an edit menu to copy some text - that told me either he still doesn't get it or wasn't willing to tread too closely to Apple's IP.

      On the other hand, the part I LOVED in the early Tablet PC demo was that the OS apparently keeps around a set of recognition guesses in the ink text structure so you can do an application level "find" command and find specified strings within a block of handwritten ink text. That was cool. Also I liked the additions of "circled" and "yellow highlighted" text attributes that look natural and reflow cleanly, and I liked the ability to add editing notations in the margins that point to a specific text section.

      Does Inkwell include support for editing gestures (such as "scrub" to delete a region) and ink text?

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
    30. Re:Wondering what's a Tablet PC? by funwithstuff · · Score: 1

      Does Inkwell include support for editing gestures (such as "scrub" to delete a region) and ink text?

      Yes, it does. This page has some more info on what it does, and because I couldn't find an example there, I screen-grabbed a gesture list and put it here.

      --
      it's not about the karma, it's about the whuffie
  8. Cheering for Microsoft? Nope... by KeatonMill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I doubt they cheered because it was Microsoft, but because it was a tablet PC. As the article says, people have been trying to make an effective tablet PC for years. Maybe Microsoft will *&@% it up, but at least now we know that it CAN be done, and maybe other companies will figure out how to do it as well. I hope

    1. Re:Cheering for Microsoft? Nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pathetic slashbot. Why don't you take your immature rantings and *CRAM THEM* up your ass.

  9. My problem with M$... by kitzilla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...is their desktop OS monopoly, not than their applications. If they've done something cool, power to 'em. It'll be amusing seeing somebody copying M$, rather than the other way around.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    1. Re:My problem with M$... by thasmudyan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ...is their desktop OS monopoly, not than their applications. If they've done something cool, power to 'em.

      And that's exactly where the problems begin. It's just my personal opinion but most of the absolutely neat software features I see invariably come from Microsoft. It's not just that they are able to throw huge amounts of money into development (others do that too) it's that they almost always come up with definetely visionary stuff in consumer software (currently only topped by Apple). In contrast to KDE and Gnome, MS and Apple applications convey a look and feel that is fun to use.

      So where is Desktop Linux, where is Tablet Linux? (Insert my usual usablility rant here) Even if it probably is only an OS for geeks, it's quite clear that geeks love neat stuff, too. Or otherwise there wouldn't be so many Linux-to-OSX converts and there wouldn't be so many Linux zealots here on ./ who quietly use Windows to be productive. Maybe it is because hardcore programmers only care about tech specs and standards compliance (which is of course important). But if we don't start to produce VERY NEAT applications and user interfaces we will all be living in DRM Town very soon!

    2. Re:My problem with M$... by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 2

      It'll be amusing seeing somebody copying M$, rather than the other way around.

      In this case, it's a little too late -- IBM ThinkPad 710T precedes this Microsoft product by about nine years.

    3. Re:My problem with M$... by b17bmbr · · Score: 2, Informative

      i beleive the newton from mac did this like 10 years ago, but the procesors weren't fast enough to keep up with handwriting recognition.

      so much for m$ innovation.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    4. Re:My problem with M$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Posted before, so here it is again.
      Here...

    5. Re:My problem with M$... by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're going to bring the Newton into it, then it should be noted that Pocket PCs, such as my Toshiba e310, let you write out cursive text and it converts it to text. It does a fairly good job of it as well.

      Of course I prefer the keyboard anyones. My handwriting, like most nerds brought up on a lifetime of computers and typing, is absolutely positively atrocious.

    6. Re:My problem with M$... by cscx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure Linux let's you use the pen as a mouse, big deal. There is no inking handwriting recognition software (from what I hear, it took MS a long time to perfect it).

    7. Re:My problem with M$... by The+Trix+Rabbit · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's why we're living in a world of IBM Tablet PC's everywhere.

      You should probably leave that little magical world of yours, sometime.

  10. how long.. by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Funny

    before:
    1)People get one and install Linux onto it (eleven seconds)
    2)Someone tries to make a beowulf cluster (fourteen minutes)
    3)We see them on eBay (4 days)
    4)That hinge thing on the Acer one gets broken (0.5345 seconds after the warranty expires)

    1. Re:how long.. by BabyDave · · Score: 5, Funny
      1)People get one and install Linux onto it (eleven seconds)


      1a) The first one gets Slashdotted (11.00001 seconds)
    2. Re:how long.. by Gleng · · Score: 3, Funny

      5) Windows XP hangs with a DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL blue screen (after 2 days; every 5 minutes)

      6) Time spent reinstalling all your software and settings (8 hours)

      7) goto 5

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    3. Re:how long.. by Ivan+Raikov · · Score: 0, Troll

      5) Windows XP hangs with a DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL blue screen (after 2 days; every 5 minutes)

      6) Time spent reinstalling all your software and settings (8 hours)

      6.5) Windows trolls post on Slashdot how Win XP works for them, because they've configured it properly, and if it doesn't work for you, surely you don't know what you're doing.

    4. Re:how long.. by image · · Score: 2

      > People get one and install Linux onto it (eleven seconds)

      The interesting thing about this is that the tablet PC may be a more powerful tool running Windows XP than it would be running Linux. Much as we all like to talk about how MS doesn't innovate, their work on handwriting recognition may actually be years ahead of any open-source alternative.

      Of course, if I had one I'd *still* install Linux on it. In a partition. Take notes and use the pen in XP, and write code via the keyboard under Linux. Then again, you can use xemacs under Windows, so sometimes even the reboot may be more trouble than it is worth. I'm willing to give proper credit to MS for bringing the next generation of portable technologies to the masses -- and it may even be worth the cost, in terms of absolutely absurd and offensive licensing practices.

    5. Re:how long.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2

      bwahahahaha... if I cod mod & post in the same topic, I'd mod that up. hehehe...

    6. Re:how long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6.5.1) Person realizes that DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL bug is a bug in a system device driver.

    7. Re:how long.. by obidobi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I got that error when mixing PC100 and PC133 memory. Maby that's your problem to?

    8. Re:how long.. by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      1a) The first one gets Slashdotted (11.00001 seconds)

      1b) The first one gets Slashdotted again after a repeat story is posted. (3 hours - 2 years (variable))

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    9. Re:how long.. by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

      1)People get one and install Linux onto it (eleven seconds)

      1b) People get handwriting recognition on their Linux version (eleven years)

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    10. Re:how long.. by Rysc · · Score: 5, Funny

      6.5) Windows trolls post on Slashdot how Win XP works for them, because they've configured it properly, and if it doesn't work for you, surely you don't know what you're doing.

      Wait... isn't that what Linux users normally say about Linux?

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    11. Re:how long.. by Gleng · · Score: 1

      6.5.2) Time spent trying the drivers certified by MS, the official drivers from the hardware manufacturer, the generic drivers, some drivers for a similar device, and the win2k drivers (hey, they *might* work) (all day)

      6.5.3) Time spent wishing you had the source code (indefinite)

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    12. Re:how long.. by Genyin · · Score: 1

      7) goto 5

      but... but... I thought goto's were considered harmful!
    13. Re:how long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if I haddock and plaice, well...

    14. Re:how long.. by thumperward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I had that. Really fun figuring out what the problem was.

      Incidentally, for the record, the amount of rabid, anti-MS garbage on this thread is quite staggering. As is the amount of moderation points that have been spent on making "I bet it crashes! LOL" posts +5 Funny.

      - Chris

    15. Re:how long.. by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      but... but... I thought goto's were considered harmful!

      There are times when a goto is the elegant solution (at least until C lets you tell break how many levels of nesting you need to break out of).

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    16. Re:how long.. by mark*workfire · · Score: 1

      How long after general release before Microsoft releases the first security software patch -- 1 day.

    17. Re:how long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6.5.3) Time spent wishing you had the source code (indefinite)

      6.5.3.1) Corrolary: You are definitely a homosexual.

    18. Re:how long.. by mirko · · Score: 2, Informative

      People get handwriting recognition on their Linux version (eleven years)

      Sorry, my Sharp Zaurus actually runs Linux and has a better handwriting recognition than my Palm had.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    19. Re:how long.. by invisibastard · · Score: 1

      33. Someone figures out how to say how wonderful their life is now that they use Gentoo, and look forward to using Gentoo on it (thirty three minutes)

    20. Re:how long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6.5.3.1) Time Gleng spends wishing he knew a real girl that was actually born female (entire lifetime)

    21. Re:how long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your software problem could be related to the fact that you are totally clueless...

    22. Re:how long.. by CoolVibe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Some people consider Microsoft to be harmful. Sounds like a great match to me ;)

    23. Re:how long.. by en4ca · · Score: 1

      (7) Time until someone loses the stylus, and realises using a non-microsoft replacement will void the warranty, and, under terms in the EULA, result in a $25,000 fine...(about 1 week)

    24. Re:how long.. by runderwo · · Score: 1
      Wait... isn't that what Linux users normally say about Linux?
      Yep, but the difference is that when you get frustrated and hand your system over to a Linux expert, they can solve the problem (when it is solvable) and tell you how to avoid it in the future. Try doing that with one of these Windows trolls. The best answer you'll get is that "you need a fresh install".
    25. Re:how long.. by Hast · · Score: 2

      They're not the only ones making high quality handwriting recognition software. I know that a smallish company around here (Decuma) has done some major progress in the area as well. Last I heard they got a lot of good press in eg Japan.

      Now this is not free software, and it's made for PocketPC as of now. But apparently there's contenders out there who are on the same level as Microsoft.

      What I'd like to see is software like this ported to Linux. Even if I have to pay for it at least it would then give me an alternative. I no longer would have to chose between Windows and good hand writing or Linux and crappy hand writing. A tablet PC is one of the things I /really/ want, but I don't want one that is crippled.

    26. Re:how long.. by geekee · · Score: 1

      Given that there is only one machine that needs this touch screen driver, which was developed by MS, so is comapible with windows, it's probably pretty stable. When there are 100 clones of this machine, each with their own crappy drivers, those machines will like be less stable. Random drivers that crash windows are the most serious problem MS faces in making a stable system.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    27. Re:how long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5) Windows XP hangs with a DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL blue screen (after 2 days; every 5 minutes)

      I've come across two things that cause this problem:
      1) Crappy memory. This is a hardware problem and not MS fault.
      2) NVidia drivers. This is a driver issue and not MS fault.

      6) Time spent reinstalling all your software and settings (8 hours)

      And if you spend 8 hours re-installing you are a complete dipshit. You can go to any computer show or numerous sites on-line and buy Norton Ghost 2002 for less than $15 USD. Partition your HDD at least 2 partions, one of which is 2-5 GB. Install XP and all the software you will always use and never uninstall and create a "Ghost" image to your 2-5 GB partition. Now, if you need to re-install, just run "Ghost" and overwrite your primary partition with the image on the secondary drive. It takes between 8 - 20 minutes depending on size. I don't know about you, but I'd rather spend $15 instead of wasting 8 hours.

    28. Re:how long.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit - the handscrawled letter recognizer on my zaurus is a far greater pain in the ass than Graffiti(sp.) on my Palm IIIx ever was. Then again, there's no point in using the Zaurus' letter-recognizer, you just open it up and use the keyboard. If it's in the cradle, VNC into it from your desktop (you *have* put the VNC server on your Z, right?)

    29. Re:how long.. by tabby · · Score: 1

      maybe if hw recognition wasn't so much slower and less effecient than typing then OSS developers would do something. But the fact of the matter is that its just an idea that is easy to sell cause a lot of people (changing now) can't type or don't want to learn. It just isn't a better way to input data.

      OSS doesn't quite seem able to quickly develop ideas that have no real substance to them.

      While I'm posting I might as well point out the flaw in the MS site's analogy of StarTrek PADDs. I don't think I've ever seen a ST character use a PADD for any purpose other than giving data like a report or cargo manifest to another character. I've never seen a character actually produce work on one. They appear to be little else than digital paper rather than portable computers.

      --
      I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
    30. Re:how long.. by Gleng · · Score: 1

      Wow! It must have taken you all day to think those up! :)

      Even Noel Coward would've been rendered speechless by your rapier-like wit.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    31. Re:how long.. by mirko · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit
      Hi, "I call mirko" :)

      there's no point in using the Zaurus' letter-recognizer, you just open it up and use the keyboard.
      OK, but what if you want to use 8-bit characters, like if you are français and need to enter details about Frédéric-Côme Lévêque, à Villers-lès-Nancy ?

      You are not honest when you compare this that way, the Z write recognition is far more intuitive for the newcomer which I was not but which other people I converted to the Z were and entering specific chars is just a pleasure...

      The keyboard is just a transitional facility.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    32. Re:how long.. by WNight · · Score: 2

      When Win2k gave me that error I couldn't make it install. Always died during the text phase of the install.

      Mandrake 8.2 installed perfectly, detected all of my hardware, and let me get online to find out what was wrong with Win2k.

      But yeah, it was a hardware problem. Sure.

      So I never bothered going back to 2k.

  11. So Close to first post... by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 1

    Yet so far... Anyway, I'm quite looking forward to the Tablet PC, it seems logically where the PC is meant to go.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
  12. Almost there by Joe+U · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Acer just needs to add more RAM and and DVD video into their tablet and this will be a laptop (and portable DVD player) killer product.

    1. Re:Almost there by BigJimSlade · · Score: 2

      Acer just needs to add more RAM and and DVD video into their tablet and this will be a laptop (and portable DVD player) killer product.

      That and drop the estimated retail price of $4500 down a bit. That should do it.

    2. Re:Almost there by VisualVoice · · Score: 1

      Its sells for $2400 on PC Connection http://www.pcconnection.com/scripts/productdetail. asp?product_id=319674

    3. Re:Almost there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If more people could write as fast as they can type, maybe this would replace a conventional machine with keyboard. That's not happening, so the tablet PC is going to be a niche product, forever or until accurate and selective thought recognition becomes reality, whichever comes first.

    4. Re:Almost there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since this give the option to either write or type it seems to be the best of both worlds!

  13. timing by ayeco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is it that a tablet pc now gets cheers, as compared to a few years ago when all attempts for a tablet product fell on deaf ears (besides specialized applications)?

    Since the PDA craze is still hot, I suppose a new piece of hardware with some new, nifty software features is enough to get this thing some thumbs up. I've always wondered why there weren't hinges on laptops like this one. It seems like a no brainer (touch screen or not - a mouse/stick/pad on the side of the screen would have worked too).

    It all about timing. Flexibility is finally "in".

    1. Re:timing by cornjchob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A few years ago, the miniaturization and processing power just weren't there, let alone the LCD capabilities. You need the miniaturization because you need smaller components to run cooler; a proc that's running at 120 directly behind an lcd screen will probably do more bad than good. You'll need the processing power because good handwriting recognition/speech recognition requires a relatively good amount of it, not to mention very good algorithims and a lot of RAM to store the reference characters in. And to make LCD screens that large with LCD screen drivers that small is an accomplishment in and of itself. Sometimes the public isn't ready because the product isn't ready.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    2. Re:timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi yeah I'm just an anonymous coward and this won't get read, but hey, I'll tell you that the only reason there's any fanfare is because we're at a really low point with the economy and tech industry, and MS still has money, so they go around to a bunch of college kids hoping to get jobs and brainwash them for several days about how great the future still is--because of companies like MS.

      Then, they have a bunch of people waiting for when someone posts to slashdot about the new concept of a tablet pc (this has been around a while folks) and the first 10 posts or so, are very non-typical-slashdot, but mostly seem to help generate a buzz, rather than healthy skepticism.

      MS has been advertising their BS in Manhattan for a while now and it's pissing people off, it started off last year when they replaced a large Linux billboard in Times Square with an XP billboard (42nd and 8th). Now they are defacing public property with butterfly stickers and have people dressed up as butterflies rollerblading down streets.

      There is a new marketing concept where companies pay people to act like normal and go into the general populace and do something which promotes the company's product. I'm not surprised to see it online, on Slashdot.

  14. Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hellooooo... These are nothing new. I've had a Stylistic 1200 for years now, with the battery stylus, I'd prefer touch instead. Been running WinXX variant on it as well as different Linux dists. Nothing new here. More powerful, sure. Bigger screen, yep. But "Microsoft's concept"? Please. Not to mention they're taking a generic term, "tablet PC" and trying to make it a branding of their own product. Ridiculous.

    1. Re:Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

      Damn it now you had to go and mention something cool like that and I just have to have one. :-)

    2. Re:Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by Wylfing · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've had a Stylistic 1200 [the-labs.com] for years now, with the battery stylus, I'd prefer touch instead. Been running WinXX variant on it as well as different Linux dists. Nothing new here. More powerful, sure. Bigger screen, yep. But "Microsoft's concept"? Please.

      This is SOP for Microsoft, though. They always destroy someone else's innovative technology via the usual anticompetitive means (or just plain FUD), then release that same technology a few years later amid great fanfare as if it is a great new idea from Microsoft.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    3. Re:Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nothing new here?? Did you read the article? Try the MSR artcile. What's new here is the "ink text." It lets you store your article as in digital ink text and drawing. Plus you'll be able to edit & search your text later. Letters written in ink text are NOT stored as typed letters. Get it?

    4. Re:Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      Letters written in ink text are NOT stored as typed letters. Get it?


      And this is a Good Thing... Why?

    5. Re:Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The keys to why Microsoft will be successful:

      1) Good handwriting recognition.
      2) Office w/good handwriting integration.
      3) Developers, developers, developers...

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    6. Re:Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by Gumber · · Score: 2

      I don't think the fact that ink text isn't stores as typed letters is a good thing. What happens when you get passed someone elses ink notes? Are you really going to be able to read their handwriting?

    7. Re:Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Informative

      Don't spout about that which you don't know.

      I used to annotate my documents using digital ink editing marks and notes and digital ink diagrams as well as write some documents using natural handwriting recognition on my Fujitsu Stylistic using PenOffice. This particular model was more half a decade old -- it had a Pentium 100 CPU and an 800x600 display and ran Windows 95 + Office 95.

      This is nothing new.

      What happened to my Stylistic running Windows 95? I replaced it with an Apple Newton, yet another product which allows you to store digital in annotations and sketches for office documents and then recognize them later if you wish, but which is half the size of the Stylistic. The Newton 2000 was also released half more than half a decade ago. The Newton even has a cute "digital ink eraser" technique for editing your sketches and annotations.

      Most of the technology Microsft is demonstrating right now has been licensed from existing products (like PenOffice and Calligrapher) that have been on the market for years already. It's not exactly a secret.

      Yes, we read the article. But do you know what you're talking about?

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    8. Re:Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by cmeans · · Score: 2
      There was no mention (that I recall) of having to train the software to recognize handwriting (or even train the user), so there's a good likelyhood that digital ink notes can be passed around easily...they would be much more useful that way...

      This could also lead to an actual Digital (Ink) Signature...though M$ isn't exactly on the forefront of secure technologies, and there'd need to be ways to verify the signature was "hand entered" verses just pasted in.

    9. Re:Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      4) Marketing.

    10. Re:Tablet PCs Are Nothing New by kir · · Score: 1, Redundant

      5) ???
      6) Profit!!!

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
  15. Credit Where it's Due by Gleng · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate Microsoft not because of any moral high ground, but because of their shoddy products and suspect business practices.

    If they fairly produce a product that is useful and works well -- standing on it's own merits, then I say good luck to them.

    I must say though, I'll believe a good Microsoft product when I actually see it for myself. ;)

    --
    "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    1. Re:Credit Where it's Due by havardi · · Score: 1

      "Seeing" it is exactly where MS comes ahead. Use Windows XP for a few hours and it is absolutely amazing, visually and technically. And I'm sure this "Tablet" PC is the same way. But within a year of use it still turns out to be a huge pile of shit. Aren't all MS products like this?

    2. Re:Credit Where it's Due by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I played with Windows XP last night in Circuit City while my wife decided which DVD player she wanted to buy. (When I have to use Windows, I use Win2K). The GUI is butt-ugly, bloated, and poorly laid out. All of the productivity killing Window-isms are still there. It's like death by a thousand cuts, except when it's the instant BSOD. And I was underwhelmed by the performance of the 2+ GHz Pentium.

    3. Re:Credit Where it's Due by apweiler · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm... good points - business practices, product standing on its own merits. That's just it, isn't it?

      Mind you, I haven't tried WinXP, can't be bothered... but from what I hear, it's quite good technically (as in, own merits). But it's unacceptable for me (and so, very likely, is this tablet thing) because of some things MS puts in - forced registration, DRM at basic level, all of that).

      That said, the idea of a tablet PC is pretty cool - even if it runs a Microsoft OS. What bothers me is that this sounds like the OS being tied even more closely to the hardware than usual.

    4. Re:Credit Where it's Due by oakbox · · Score: 1
      While MS Software sucks ass, I have to admit that I do like their hardware. I have a Microsoft trackball that has given me nothing but solid performance. And before I started spending all my time working on my computer instead of playing games, I liked the solid feel and mechanics behind a MS joystick.


      So many companies have tackled the tablet PC problem in the past and failed. I just can't see that this format works, even if MS pushes it hard.

      --
      Not just answers, the correct questions.
    5. Re:Credit Where it's Due by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know people are going to slay me here for this, so let me preface this comment:
      1. I do not use Microsoft products on any of my personal machines (All of my machines at home have Linux with GNOME, and Open BSD here thank you very much)
      2. I don't agree with Microsoft's licensing, pricing or business practices.
      3. I only use XP at work and on the laptop that my job provided me with. Doesn't cost me a cent...

      But... Windows XP Professional is the best product I've seen come out of Microsoft. It offers features that make working VERY easy. The revamp of the Start menu is very well thought out. It provides immediate and easy access to the applications that you use the most (In my case Cygwin bash and Cygwin X Server, CMD, Windows Remote Desktop, Cicso VPN client) by listing them directly on the Start menu in order of the frequency of usage. It also provides immediate access to IE and OE, (if you use them. I removed them from the menu and use Phoenix. My mail client is still Evolution via X) as well as the typically accessed:
      -My Documents
      -My Recently used Documents
      -My Pictures
      -My Music
      -My Computer
      -My Network Places
      -Control Panels
      -Administrative Tools
      -Connect to... (An agreggate of dial-up, WLAN and LAN connections tha tyou can choose from. Very helpful for laptop users to allow quick connect/disconnect)
      -Printers and Faxes (Combines the old Printers and Faxes applets which used to be separate)

      and of course:

      -Search (hate the little dog though..)
      -Run... (By far the most useful menu option for accessing remote file shares, the CMD prompt and quick access to notepad)

      Then it also has the "All Programs" sub menu which gives you access to the rest of the less used programs on the system.

      The Log Off button makes logging out (or even suspending a session to let someone else log on) a snap.

      I'd have to say that Windows XP really makes some great improvements on Windows 2K. Anyone who has problems with Windows XP Pro, is probably fairly inflexible. Keep in mind, I am not saying that such a person is not bad. Mac users are fairly inflexible in that they don't want to move from their GUI paradigm to the Windows paradigm. Most of my co-workers (Windows fans all of them) don't like XP either and always go back to Classic View. I forced myself to stay with the native XP view and have found that it is actually a lot faster than Classic View once you know where everything is. as much as I hate to say it, MS did a great job with XP. I haven't had any problems with it so far.

      I think that we developers in the Linux/OSS/GNU world need to take a good look at XP and see what it offers that we can improve upon. We already know that Linux/UNIX is stable, secure, robust, etc... Those are important factors. But so are the factors that real users see: Ease of use, quick and efficient ways to access data and applications, intelligent environments. For anyone who is working on developing software for "Joe Average", we need to think about having the apps learn their user's usage style. Not in the annoying way that MS does it. MS tends to be application-centric with regard to intelligent applications (that learn what you do). The intelligent applications should be user-centric. Where they learn what a user does, and rather than suggest or force the user to do something (Office assistant and the Start menu listing the most recently used applications), it builds a list of options and notifies the user with a dialog to select the way that they want to do the task. The dialog can be dismissed or filled in and submitted. The machine won't have a need to ask the user about that approach again. Just a simple example. The point is that MS is getting better at doing what the users want. We as developers for the "other side" can't forget that the users are what matter, not the apps or the OS...

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    6. Re:Credit Where it's Due by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      I said: "Keep in mind, I am not saying that such a person is not bad."
      I meant to say:"Keep in mind, I am not saying that such a person is bad.

      Sorry folks

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    7. Re:Credit Where it's Due by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off Topic! Blow it out your fucking nasty canker infested asshole you worthless piece of shit! This post was carefully written to illustrate that Microsoft IS gaining on the usability side of consumer devices and OSes. I want to see Linux become commonplace, but that won't happen if the developers don't pay attention to what the users want. When you moderate, do it with some cluefulness you fucktard. This parent post deserves at least a 4 - Insightful. Anyone else mods this down, and I'm going to make sure each one of your boxes gets DDOSed so hard, they'll never come back. Oh and by the way. I'm not the original author. He's a fucktard too. I've seen his other posts. But at least he wrote something that wasn't completely biased in one direction or the other.

  16. Old News by llamaluvr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tablet PC?! Electromagnetic input pen?! I'm pretty sure Fisher-Price made the same thing like 25 years ago!

    --
    Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    1. Re:Old News by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 5, Funny

      That would be awesome to take into a big business meeting. Everyone's all serious and taking little notes and getting phone numbers, and you're drawing pictures of airplanes. "BRRROOOM!"

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    2. Re:Old News by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 2

      That system is really insecure.

      One slide of the button deletes your whole work!

      --
      ^_^
    3. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which would be perfect for corporate American pointy hairs.. destroy the audit trail, and quick!!

    4. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That system is really insecure.

      One slide of the button deletes your whole work!
      >
      >
      You Mac users shouldn't have any problems with it then,right?

    5. Re:Old News by swankypimp · · Score: 2
      One slide of the button deletes your whole work!

      On reboot, try:
      fsck -y /dev/etch0

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
  17. What's wrong with a keyboard? by sitturat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know why people think a keyboard is such a bad thing. I can type much better than I can write, and I expect that goes for most PC users under the age of 50.

    My laptop gives me amazing mobility. I can even use it without having a desk by putting it on my lap (hence the name LAPtop).

    I just don't understand what is so revolutionary about the Tablet PC. Can someone please enlighten me?

    1. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by ayeco · · Score: 1

      the acer does have a keyboard.

    2. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by dsfox · · Score: 1, Troll

      You could start by reading the articles. Especially the one on the MSR site.

    3. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nothing's wrong with a keyboard. That's why it has one. But having worked in places where people can't type as well as they can write (and I assure you I wouldn't go with "most" for describing the alternate), I can see why people would like this. Some people write much better than they type. Some people want to just speak and have their words appear. I don't want to be a fanboy of a product that's not shipping yet, but it seems to me that those options would be the most appealing part to this, especially if they work out of the box.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    4. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Microsoft tells it's revolutionary to make an oversized, noisy and heavy PDA. Isn't that enough as a reason for you?

      Seriously, I have really, honestly thought of situations in which a tablet-PC might be useful. In all cases, a currently existing, cheaper, more reliable and readily available PDA would have been better though.

      The only thing I would see as a possible use is for graphic artists which might need a large touchscreen. Yeah, that's possibly nicer than with a graphics tablet (although I'm no graphics artist). But other than that, I don't see any real use.

      And that's the reason why all tablet-PC attempts have failed so far.

    5. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by loply · · Score: 2

      There is a simple difference between a PDA and a laptop/tablet PC.
      Could you fit a website designed for 800x600 on your 240x160 PDA? Didnt think so. Maybe you can fit the logo though.

    6. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by BigJimSlade · · Score: 2

      I don't know why people think a keyboard is such a bad thing. I can type much better than I can write, and I expect that goes for most PC users under the age of 50.

      That's quite an assumption you're making there. I know quite a few people that can take notes better than they can type on a keyboard, especially a subnote keyboard with extra small keys.

      While I will concede that they are not really revolutionary or anything, I think it's a nice concept. I especially like the "slate" PC, although I haven't seen any specs on those yet. All these PCs should have a hardware button on the screen that allows an instant switch between landscape and portrait layouts. Sounds like a more full-featured eBook-reading platform.

      Will I buy one? Certainly not at the ~$4500 price point I've seen in some articles on the Acer. They'll need to get the price down before I consider one. Anyway, I'm waiting for the iSlate/iTablet/iWhatever from Apple that will do the same thing. (pleasePleasePlease!)

    7. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I read slashdot on my pda okay - at 240x320
      And news sites, and so on.
      I know you said "designed for 800x600" but most of the sites i read from a pda are mostly txt based since i use it to read websites - not go play some flash snooker game..

    8. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by iamdrscience · · Score: 1
      Could you fit a website designed for 800x600 on your 240x160 PDA?
      If the site was designed with a specific resolution in mind then I'm not sure I'd want to read it. Designing websites for specific resolutions is for people that don't know how to design websites.
    9. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know why people think a keyboard is such a bad thing.

      It's an extra piece of equipment to carry around, you have to sit down to use it adequately, and it requires two hands to operate at a reasonable speed (no chord keyboard rebuttals, please).

      However, all that being said, there is nothing stopping keyboards from being integrated with tablet pc's that Microsoft is showing off. Some do have that as an option.

      I can type much better than I can write

      No one is saying you'd have to write EVERYTHING on a tablet PC! Read the articles about them. Go see a demo. That's not the point. The point is you CAN walk around with it like a notebook and make notes, do cool things standing up and moving around with a PC easily, then set it down on your desk and sync up with keyboard, mouse, etc.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    10. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      You demonstrated a use of what a laptop can do better than a PDA.

      Now demonstrate a use of what a tablet-PC can do better than a PC/PDA combination.

      Everybody already has a PDA and the 100 grams or so don't really encumber you or do they?

    11. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by jacobjyu · · Score: 1

      The idea itself isn't that revolutionary, but there are certain things in typing that are inherently constraining. What if during a meeting you want to quickly draw something next to the text? Or you want write some annotations with arrows and pointers elucidating the main text? Basically it comes down to you wanting to write text that is not confined in straight horizontal lines, which most typed text is.

      Also, it's just a little more natural to follow someone when they are explaining something using a pen than a keyboard.. which is why white boards are popular.. think of it as a small digital whiteboard and journal.

    12. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have read the articles and i don't see the appeal either, sure it all sounds good and dandy, but for real world applications I just don't think it'll fly. In working in an interactive firm, I see our producers using it for a week or two then going back to do things the old way. You want to take it to the 'conference' room, just toss some dummy terminals in there and type away (or have someone with any secretary like skills to type for you).

      Not to mention if you can write faster then you type, you're not going to be tech savy enough to figure out the major 'cutting edge' features anyway :) (like digital yellow post it notes are cutting edge, lol)

    13. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me see you continue to type at your normal rate while standing and holding your laptop in your hand.

    14. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      I can type much better than I can write,

      If I were taking an English class, I might agree. But when I'm in math class, I'm much happier with a pencil then a keyboard. Until full IPA keyboards come out, I think most linguists are in the same boat.

    15. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Goldsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tablet PCs aren't really optimized for the "geek" market. Where they are really usefull is for the "real world".

      For example: There are not very many general contractors (construction workers) out there using laptops. If they need to get an idea across of what they need, they probably need to draw a picture, and they're not going to take the time to open up *Cad and diagram the thing out.

      Now... this isn't a new idea. Next time you get a delivery from UPS, look at the thing the delivery guy is carrying, that's basically a tablet PC.

      The problem with the Tablet PC market right now is that only big companies really use them. It's not been out there enough for your average person to know where to get one, or even that they could. The reason MS doing this is great is that it opens up another large group of people to the digital age.

    16. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by tbradshaw · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can tell you exactly what the limitation of a keyboard is... you can't draw with it. At least not quickly. I noticed this shortcoming of my laptop just this Friday while I was in a review session for a biology class. As per usual, I had my laptop out and I was diligently... well... I was at least taking *some* notes during the session for later perusal. Then, while going into genetics, the instructor showed a method of completing the genetics problems that actually involved drawing the allels and chromatids and combining that simple and effective artwork with the typical table used to find genotype/phenotype probabilities. It was so simple, so elegent, and I couldn't find a damn way to get that quickly (I'm in a lecture after all) down into my text file or word processing document. All I could think of was. Damn, I wish I could just pull out a stylus and draw this on my screen. I ended up whipping out my mad ascii art skills from days of BBS yore. But I would have much rather had a stylus.

    17. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm of the opinion that Apple either won't do a tablet, or at least such a product wouldn't last long. Why?

      In order to get people to enjoy using a computer it either has to be reasonably adaptable to their needs, or very tightly targeted.

      The iPod is a perfect demonstration of the latter. It's a killer MP3 player. It has a few extras, but those are just icing on the cake, rather than something people expect of it. Thus every new feature is a treat, rather than an obligation. The iPod is also quite successful.

      The problem with a tablet is that it has a relatively big color screen and versatile input. I expect to be able to do pretty much anything I can do on my iMac on an iTablet. I expect a tablet to be fully functional without depending on a desktop for anything(and for that matter, I don't want a concept where removing the tablet from the equation cripples my desktop).

      But this means that a tablet has to have pretty much everything a compact, yet fully-featured(like the iBook, rather than one that requires a "docking station") laptop. Double hinged screen or not, the "tablet" then becomes cumbersome. My Mead 70 page notebook doesn't weigh nearly as much as even the lightest laptop.

      The tablet concept is something that wants to be too many things at one time. It either has to wait for technology to become light and thin enough to make truly lightweight, non-crippled laptops, or it has to be more specifically targeted as a middle ground between the laptop and PDA. Right now it's just too close to being a laptop with a fancy screen to distinguish itself from that already-saturated market.

    18. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by nigelc · · Score: 1
      (1) In my spare time, I do theater light design for a couple of community and low-paying professional theatres. I've been looking for a tablet-sized device for sketching the stage, making notes, annotating lighting grid designs and so forth for years!

      Right now, I use a notepad (the paper kind) and innumerable fading photocopies of the stage, the lighting grid and the stage drawings. Then I get to transfer my drawings (covered with notes, annotations, scribbled erasures, coffee-stains and donut-skid-marks) to the desktop PC at home.

      I would give serious money for a tablet-sized device which I could use instead. Small matter of programming, and I could probably find a way of generating files for the lightboard straight from my drawings.

      (2) In the day job, I spend a lot of time scribbling on whiteboards, figuring things out and then transfering the information into a computer. The PDA isn't big enough, and I've already worn holes on the PDA screen just for scrolling around a "drawing canvas" (well, OK, playing iRogue on the bus might have contributed too). I could probably tie a full-sized graphics tablet to the PC at work, but that's not terribly portable.

      --


      Cthulhu Barata Nikto
    19. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, it may be better for graphics artists... (though it has nothing to do with a PDA... it is a different form-factor for PC and notebook computers, more like another way to use a monitor, keyboard, and mouse) It is like a detachable version of the Wacom Cintiq line of tablets...

      Upon closer inspections of the features of both of the types of products (at the bottom of that web page) you can see a side by side comparison of these similar products.

      A compelling reason to look at this is an ergonomic issue. As an artist, I'd like to work with a sketch pad for the general ergonomics of it. This seems like a good potential fusion of what I need. It's hooked up to your PC so you have the processing power to run Photoshop, Illustrator, Procreate Painter, etc. as well as not having to hold onto a clunky notebook computer (ever try typing on one, as you are standing up, while holding the computer with your other hand?... it doesn't seem too much like a real notebook when you try to do that!).

      IBM's recently deceased Transnote notebook seemed promising but was not a pressure sensitive display as this one is. Additionally, this a cleaner, all in one implementation (no paper fuss, why use paper for a computer? For that, buy a paper pad, draw, and scan it into your computer). With modern graphics software, this Tablet PC is like carrying around paper, pens, markers, pastels, watercolors, colored pencils, chalk, paint, etc. all in one package. Clearly an advantage.

      This seems like the form factor graphics designers have been waiting for to replace the often awkward monitor/keyboard combo on a desktop computer (I don't necessarily need to take it with me elsewhere, though I suppose the version of this product that docks to become a notebook computer would address that adequately if I needed to take it out of my studio).

      With products like the Cintiq from Wacom, you get close to what you need, but there really is no good way to use the Cintiq on a desk with a keyboard and have it be anything less than physically uncomfortable to switch back and forth between using the two as you often have to. This has the potential to solve that and what is potentially revolutionary about it to me. I'm am going to demo it in the near future to see for myself.

    20. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      covered with notes, annotations, scribbled erasures, coffee-stains and donut-skid-marks

      You REALLY think that a tablet-PC can handle that better?

    21. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it requires two hands to operate at a reasonable speed

      Cool. Does the tablet come with suction cups on the bottom or maybe a table locking device. I get it, you are going to hold it between your legs.

    22. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a job where I have to stand up to do data entry.

    23. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you post too much

    24. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, I forgot to say that there are also the "Mira" devices coming out that are just the detachable monitors (those are the monitors I was referring to in the previous post) that attach to your desktop computer.

    25. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Does the tablet come with suction cups on the bottom or maybe a table locking device. I get it, you are going to hold it between your legs.

      Huh? You will hold it like a book with one hand, and write on it with the other.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    26. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? You will hold it like a book with one hand, and write on it with the other.

      Thus requiring two hands to operate...

    27. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm posting anonymously for obvious reasons...

      The device used by UPS *IS* actually a PC, using a x86 processor and Motorola parts. The signature pad is a swappable component, and it uses NiCad batteries... Nothing fancier than any PDA

    28. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by bbc22405 · · Score: 1
      I think you misunderstand Apple's entry into the MP3 market. They seem to have noticed (pre-iPod) that existing MP3s were non-ideal in several ways, and realized that they could solve all/most of these problems (for a price, of course). These problems were speed of filling the device, capacity, battery life, and size. To their credit, they also ladled on generous helpings of ergonomics and beauty.

      If Microsoft has done a truly good job on the OS and app software for this, and if hardware manufacturers (Acer, etc) are able to supply a sufficiently powerful and sufficiently nice assortment of Tablets, then Apple might decline to enter this market.

      However, if Apple looks at Microsoft's play, and looks at its own cards, and sees that it can deliver something distinctively superior, and hard to imitate, it might enter.

      I think that the initial hardware entries are non-ideal; another poster in this discussion said the Acer he used was sluggish and laggy, and others said that battery life was waaaaay too short. I suspect the correct design for the tablet is about 8 hours of battery life, very thin and light (and hence minimal perk features such as CD/DVD drives), and very good synchronization technology.

      The minimum battery life to make this a viable product is 4 hours. (The most likely users of this hardware would be business people stuck in meetings, and students stuck in lectures. Having your Tablet go into a coma before the end of the meeting, or the end of the morning classes is unforgiveable.) If the design of the Tablets are driven to high-watt processors and constantly-spinning hard drives , by the performance needs of the OS and its apps, then that provides a great opportunity for Apple to enter the market.

    29. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 2

      I agree with pretty much everything you've said, though I think some kind of heap removable media(CD/DVD) is probably a good idea.

      The main problems I see are:

      1. Autonomy. The tablet has to be useful on its own for extended periods of time.

      2. Software. If this isn't running a full-fledged desktop OS, and assuming a beefed up PalmOS type system won't work, we'd essentially be creating a new platform.

      I'm thinking the optimal combination of hardware is:

      8-10" LCD
      1.8" hard drive
      System RAM
      RAM disk, to avoid excessive hard drive spinning.
      USB/Firewire/Ethernet
      Some kind of ARM or PPC processor.

      An optical drive probably wouldn't fit. This would allow the unit to be thinner, though. I'd put most of the guts below the LCD(as seen when the display is in "portrait" mode). It's not easy to write on the very last line of a notebook, so this would probably be a good step for ergonomics. A thick border to hang onto would also allow for spreading the internals out and keeping them out from under the heat-sensitive LCD.

    30. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then if you add a keyboard you need three hands(one to hold the computer and two to type) or four (two to hold the computer for more balance as the other two type)

      So if you're walking around, you need three or four hands to operate a laptop faster than a tablet PC.

    31. Re:What's wrong with a keyboard? by maitas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Simply put, the more versatile Input device is the pen. With a Pen you can do everything you do with a keyboard, but no the other way around. You just can't draw maps with a keyboard, etc.

  18. Chinese Characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the article states: "Handwriting recognition in the Tablet PC will be a boon for Asian consumers. Chinese and Japanese are pictorial languages with thousands of characters - it is a Herculean task to input these characters into an electronic document."

    A herculean task to input these characters into an electronic document? Hardly. In fact I think it's quite the contrary. I've had experience with many Japanese who actually find it easier to type out their language phonetically and have the computer list potential chinese character matches than writing by hand. This saves them from having to recall stroke orders for obscure characters, and is actually faster. Typing two 10 stroke characters phonetically may take four or six key strokes, which is much quicker than 20 hand written strokes.

    But then the article then goes on to point out that they have algorithms for two to four stroke characters. This makes me think they are only looking to allow input via Hiragana or Katakana - the phonetic based Japanese character sets. Maybe they understand that the task of recognizing characters with upwards of 15 strokes is overkill and maybe simply beyond reach right now.

    1. Re:Chinese Characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh chinese characters are ideographs not pictorgraphs.

      *grumbles something about Wasians*

    2. Re:Chinese Characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh-oh. My electronic dictionary/schedule/etc... (an old B/W Sharp Zaurus I bought 5 or 6 years ago) recognize characters I wrote with more than 20 strokes. But frankly this is only useful when you can't read a character (hence the dictionary). When you want to write a letter, a mail or a report it'll be ten times faster to type it on a keyboard or even on your mobile phone. People theses days even forget how to write very simple kanjis and the handwriting recognition is not gonna help them.

    3. Re:Chinese Characters by Alanus · · Score: 1

      Those where only introduced in japan after the war.

      Actually they are over 1000 years old since Japanese cannot be written using only chinese characters.

    4. Re:Chinese Characters by KJKHyperion · · Score: 3, Informative
      the article states: "Handwriting recognition in the Tablet PC will be a boon for Asian consumers. Chinese and Japanese are pictorial languages with thousands of characters - it is a Herculean task to input these characters into an electronic document."

      Not only this is perfectly feasible, but Microsoft already has such a technology. To see it in action, install the support for Japanese on Windows (any version above NT 4 and 98 should do), and activate the Japanese input method in an Unicode-aware application (for example Opera, or NT Notepad). Open the IME pad (left-click on the red pen icon in the system tray, select the menu item), activate the hand-writing mode (click on the menu that displays the current input mode, "Soft Keyboard" by default, to get the list of modes), and experiment

      Keyboard input is also possible: write the translitteration of the word, and a drop-down menu will present all the ideograms that match, and remember your choice for the future

      --

      Make a difference - use Windows! (open source clone of Windows NT)

    5. Re:Chinese Characters by glenstar · · Score: 2
      And if everyone in china is just gonna start entering pinyin to make characters you might as well pull a vietnam and just all out romanize your language...

      I disagree. On my old Japanese Sony Vaio I have the entire Hiragana "alphabet". So, using a copy of Japanese Windows, I can "spell out" Kanji using Hiragana. To me, perfectly natural. I can get the Kanji for Daibutsu by typing the "da" "i" "bu" "tsu" keys on the keyboard. Simple.

    6. Re:Chinese Characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      No, it is actually not a problem to recognize Japanese Kanji. Kanji have a very well defined stroke order. If you force the person doing the input follow proper stroke order, then its quite easy to recognize Kanji in software. Each Kanji will be well defined by the number of pen up and pen down points, whether the pen up point is to the left/right of the pen down point (and thus direction) etc etc. Using a method like this can quickly classify Kanji using modest computing resources.

      I dont know how Chinese is, (I would imagine the same), but since Japanese are very careful to document, and teach stroke order, the whole thing works well. I bought my first zaurus in Japan in 1998 because I was impressed with the ability to write Kanji on the screen. In fact I would say it recognizes Kanji far better than Hiragana, or Katakana and esp roman letters (since I prolly never use the same stroke order twice when I write quickly..)

    7. Re:Chinese Characters by devnull17 · · Score: 1

      Office XP and MSIME2002 do it now. Just install Japanese Language support, open the IME pad, and off you go. Not only that, but it's actually pretty good at matching whatever you give it.

  19. I smell a rat. by surfacearea · · Score: 3, Flamebait
    I was in a room with probably 150 hardcore linux users, and it seemed to me that the demonstration just floored them (the entire lecture hall CHEERED a Microsoft product). I believe that Microsoft's own online hype literature is insufficient in describing just how powerful their Tablet concept is. ...

    Oh, and the input stylus is electromagnetic, not pressure-sensing, ANY document (not just MS) can be annotated, and the journal software is AMAZING in its power and flexibility.

    You can't call Microsoft's stuff hype, and then make a post like this. This is hype. I don't think I need to say anything more.
    1. Re:I smell a rat. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      and the links are just to propaganda(says so) and first look linked is from way back..
      and it's dubbing tablet pc as ms concept, which, i don't count it to be, though, soon they'll be suing other people for using the tablet-pc term.

      a room with 150 HARDCORE linux users, watching a ms representation? i don't think so... (not even that there were 150 hc linuxists in a room that had 150 people).

      sure, it could be fun to take one to the wc instead of the comics book.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:I smell a rat. by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      You can't call Microsoft's stuff hype, and then make a post like this. This is hype.

      Actually, if you read his post, he called Microsoft's hype inadequate, so I don't really think he was trying to use hype in a negative way.

      I don't think I need to say anything more.

      Correct!

      Unless of course you wanted to make a point.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:I smell a rat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a room with 150 HARDCORE linux users, watching a ms representation? i don't think so... "

      yeah,neither do i...

      there's what...7 people running slashdot,plus the other 30 people who post under different names for more mod points...

      and the other half dozen people on the planet who know what linux is...

      obviously you can't fit 150 hc leenux hippies into a room,becuse there's only aboyt 50 in existance...

      maybe there were mirrors on the side walls
      bwahahhahaa!!

    4. Re:I smell a rat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I need to say anything more.

      Good, now we won't have to read your moronic posts anymore.

  20. Tablet/'Simputer' by Omkar · · Score: 1

    Wow, the tablet PC actually looks cool. I thought it was just some more hype, but the underlying concept looks good.
    On a related note, couldn't this be the perfect direction for the Simputer? It looks easy to use and powerful enough for most needs, and certainly better than a pda. All that needs to be taken care of is the cost.

  21. Killer App? by Espen · · Score: 1

    I remember interviewing for a start-up 10 years ago which wanted to make 'revolutionary' use of the pen-based (windows) tablet PCs making it on to the market at the time. Both the products and the company sank without a trace. Considering where we are at the moment, the obvious question is, what makes it any different today? The technology doesn't appear to be fundamentally different, so has somebody come up with a killer app, or is this just a fashion revival?

    1. Re:Killer App? by Helter · · Score: 1

      10 Years ago a Tablet PC would either be the size of todays Lunchbox PCs, the power of a Texas Instruments calculator, or absurdly expensive.
      The technology just wasn't there to support a useful tablet PC back then. Not to mention computers hadn't become to ubiquitous and essential in our daily lives.
      Being the first into a market doesn't do you any good if the market hasn't developed yet.

    2. Re:Killer App? by Espen · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you were 10 years ago, but we were sitting with a notebook-sized tablet PC, less than an inch thick during that interview. Yes, it was expensive, but that's because it was 'new technology', and had it caught on, I see no reason why the price wouldn't have normalized with normal laptops over time.

      My question is simply where is the new marked today?

    3. Re:Killer App? by rseuhs · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Just look at the slashdot article. "It's from Microsoft, it must be great!", "It's from Microsoft it's revolutionary!", "It's from Microsoft, whohooo".
      Then add lots of pointy haired bosses with a similar attitude.

      That said, I still don't think they will be successful long-term. Because it's Microsoft and it's "revolutionary", no matter how old the idea really is, so I see many morons buying it in the next months.

      But! there is not much use for it. There are not really many situations in which a tablet PC is better than a PDA or a Laptop. That's why the great "revolutionary" tablet-PC has been converted into a tablet/laptop hybrid. Tablet-PCs have lots of problems. They are heavy, they are fragile, the touch-screen gets dirty fast, and the center of gravity is in the screen, not the lower unit which will make it fall over easily in laptop-mode. I'd guess that most buyers will realize that they keep their laptop-part attached all the time anyway and will buy a slimmer, lighter, faster and cheaper laptop - or a PDA - in the next upgrade cycle.

      So I expect a very short tablet-PC craze which will die down soon.

    4. Re:Killer App? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok...we all know slashdot needs the advertising and people have mentioned that maybe it's guerilla marketing that slipped through the editor's fingers...but maybe it's not. Maybe it's an actual advertisement paid for...published on slashdot. I'm sick of it.

  22. What next XP for goldfish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he heh

  23. WTF? by Quixote · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This writeup sounds familiar.

    I've yet to see a house full of Linux "hardcore" geeks even warm up to a Microshaft presentation. And I've lived in the "geek world" for many many years.

    Just so you know: I have seen the Tablet PC; and most of the people (techies) who were with me were thoroughly unimpressed. I don't know what "Linux crowd" you hang out with, but check their foreheads for butterflies....

    1. Re:WTF? by wabbit42 · · Score: 1

      I think the game's up Mr Microsoft.

      No one believs you.

      Just like the amazing Mac to XP convert the other week... Is Microsoft using SlashDot for advertising?

  24. looks like a laptop by neoform · · Score: 1

    From those pictures, all it looks like is a laptop with the screen on the other side.. wow, blow my mind, how DID they think that up? p.s. very few companies have mastered hand writing recognition. hand writing is even more dificult to desipher then speech, and i think we've all played arround with speech recognition and found it to be very flawed.

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:looks like a laptop by nmg · · Score: 0, Troll

      Read the article, you stupid piece of shit.

    2. Re:looks like a laptop by neoform · · Score: 0, Troll

      eat me, since you eat shit and all.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    3. Re:looks like a laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      hey guys, can I watch?

  25. sales or marketting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is you uptight boss in the sales or the marketting department? Because they aren't the same.

    What is this tablet made out of? It is a gel-tablet, because they must have put that in the water at the presentation so described above.

    Better rush out and buy it right away. . .
    because if you don't have it then you can't keep up with the jones. Better buy it now.

    Envy, Lust, Greed, sloth,

    Better spend that whole budget right now or they won't give you another one next year.

  26. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me be the one to say: WHO CARES?
    I don't see how a Tablet PC could possibly be more
    useful than a laptop. So what if it's touch screen
    and you could write with a pen-like tool? For
    some people, using a keyboard is better than hand-writing the same thing. The Tablet PC looks just like another way for microsoft trying to gain
    total control over a market.

    1. Re:So what? by WetCat · · Score: 2

      I want it. I just want something that
      1) doesn't fold like laptop
      2) has palm graffiti AND handwrite recognition
      3) be 2 times larger than a palm pilot
      4) has at least an equivalent of 200Mhz Pentium,
      energy-independent storage and >=32 Mb memory
      hmm... may be Simputer?!
      and surely I want Linux on that thingie (or at least to have an ability to put Linux on it).

  27. Re:damn, looks hot! by cscx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Definitely, I'd hit it. And the Acer page doesn't have a disclaimer that says "Hot girl in chair does not come with Tablet PC," so hey, y'know, you might be lucky.

  28. I don't get it by Sleestack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exactly how are these features beneficial?

    I learned typing so that I didn't need to use such a painfully slow method as handwriting anymore. Why is everyone so delighted that your WPM is going down?

    As far as speaking, I don't know about the rest of you, but voice processing is useless for me practically everywhere I use a computer: On the train, in meetings, and at my desk. Everytime I've heard someone use a Dragon speech product I almost immediately hear someone else asking them to turn it off because it's annoying.

    1. Re:I don't get it by jeanicinq · · Score: 0

      The TabletPC does not stick someone with pen/stylus only input. The tablet pivots to reveal the keyboard. Then, the TabletPC could be used like a notbook compute.

      It be neat to have one of these TabletPC with a virtual PC setup. Just prop up the TabletPC on my desk and the virtual keyboard would shine on the surface below... hmmm...

    2. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, typing is only good for so much. I want to mark up files like I do my textbooks: underlines, footnotes, cross references, etc. While these things may be possible with the keyboard, my "notes" often consist of a sketch to clarify the topics at hand. The keyoard is terrable at this. When I'm reading an electronic text I usually have some scratch paper around to jot notes. I guess what I'm saying is that computers as they are now are very good at _creating_ text. They are terrible with creating graphics (without digitizer tablets) and terrible at _customizing text.

      Remember: all higher-level learning is visual. Text is crude.

    3. Re:I don't get it by The+Trix+Rabbit · · Score: 0

      It's designed for people who go outside and who don't know what "WPM" stands for, idiot.

  29. Re:interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless your plan is to get hired and bring them down from the inside, you are dead to us.

  30. Microsoft's mission by rseuhs · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... seems to be to desperately try to put a x86 in place of every electronic device.

    Just look at XBox: Big, loud, fragile, power-consuming, sold at 150$ loss - and still behind Gamecube and Playstation.

    Now the same with Tablet-PC: Isn't it just an oversized PDA? The way I see it, it combines the disadvantages from PDA and Laptop: It's too heavy and big to casually carry it around in a pocket, battery lifetime is measured in hours like with a Laptop. - But it lacks a keyboard, many interfaces and connectors.

    Why should anybody choose it over a Laptop? or a PDA?

    1. Re:Microsoft's mission by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I know this is OT -- but your description of the Xbox was about the best I have heard yet. If you visit the demo centers usually the PS2's and Gamecubes are running strong, and then you have the Xbox's sitting their with the "blank screen of death". The fact that they die on demo in so many places is one feature that has reminded me not to pick one up.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    2. Re:Microsoft's mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Acer has a keyboard.

    3. Re:Microsoft's mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are likely dead because the display case most stores stuff those things into would kill just about any electronic item that needs ventilation.

      The XBox is a better product than either of the other two game machines. It's more powerful and has more features. Neither the PS2 or the Gamecube have a harddrive. Just wait until they add a harddrive to the PS2 in the display case to see how long they run.

    4. Re:Microsoft's mission by tshak · · Score: 2

      Just look at XBox: Big, loud, fragile, power-consuming, sold at 150$ loss - and still behind Gamecube and Playstation.

      Please, if you must diss MS, diss them on fact, not blind zeal.

      XBox: Big. Sure, I'll give you that. It's also the most powerful console.

      Loud: Not any louder then my PS2. The fricken DVD players are loud on these things - like a mini F16! Contrary to ignorant beliefs, the HD is actually pretty quiet.

      Fragile: I take my XBox everywhere in a backpack. On the bus, to XBox parties, and in my car (in which I drive aggressively!). Still works great.

      Power-Consuming: Ya, MS hasn't figured out how to make an electronic device that doesn't consume electricity. Seriously, get the HD add-on for the PS2 and your power consumption is not a whole lot less then the XBox. Of course, a GF4 requires more power then a GF2, or a 2Ghz p4 takes more power then a 1.4Ghz P4, so it makes perfect sense that again, the most powerful console requires the most power. (DUH?)

      $150 loss: This is pure speculation. I know many people inside MS who laugh at this number. What's normally not considered is how fast x86 parts drop. Even if the $150 number was true last year, it sure isn't true today. Until I see real data from MS or Flextronics (the manufacturer), it's just as easy to believe that they lose only $15.

      Still behind GC and PS2: Well, the PS2 was out way before the XBox, and had the momentum from the incredible success from the PS. The GameCube is, well, Nintendo. A brand that we all remember as a kid. The GC is also $50 cheaper (thanks to really crappy controllers, and a good hardware design), and has incredible titles that build off exclusive Nintendo brands like Mario and Zelda. Microsoft is also the first American company to seriously compete in the console industry. They've got an uphill battle. I say, selling half of what Nintendo sells is a HUGE success for their position.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    5. Re:Microsoft's mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well actually they want to put in a proc that can run their flagship WINDOWS. Windows Windows everywhere, Windows Windows in my hair.

    6. Re:Microsoft's mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, if you must defend MS, defend them on fact, not blind zeal.

      XBox: Huge. Things can be powerful and small. Just look at the laptop market.

      Loud: My PS2 is silent. My XBox? a train rushing by. I've had to turn up the game volume to hear the game over the console using the XBox, but not the PS2.

      Fragile: Plastic is mutable. Anything will break if its used enough, regardless of what label is on it.

      Power-Consuming: Nice wisecrack, really. Again, I cite laptops. How come a laptop can have a GF4 and 60GB and run off a battery fine, yet the XBox could suck the Niagara falls dry?

      $150 loss: the XBox was INITIALLY made from the cheapest parts to keep costs down. Parts that are already on the bottom rung dont have much to drop. Sure, they costs have likely dropped a bit, but think about it: things that are as cheap as they're going to get aren't going to have much further to fall.

      Note: flextronics themselves have admitted this fact.

      "Well, considering the PS2 and GC, the XBox is doing pretty well" [paraphrased]. Microsoft is struggling to get the XBox a foothold, despite titles like Halo (which had a LOT of hype), Dead or Alive 3, plus all the market clout that we call Microsoft's marketing department.

      Personally, I hold the GC is very high respect. Its small, low-power-consumption, good graphics, and excellent games, and I happen to like the controller.

    7. Re:Microsoft's mission by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Isn't it funny that XBox fanboys are following the incredible double-standard in noticeing that PS2 had a 2-year lead when it comes to game library, but completely ignoring the 2-year advantage the XBox has when it comes to technology?

      Of course XBox is more powerful than PS2. But it's still rather dissapointing for 2 years.

      Actually, a game system should be so much better that it should easily outsell a 2 year old system despite smaller initial game library.

      That's how it was all the time: Every new console started with a smaller library and outsold the older consoles.

      Every console except XBox of course.

      And if losing 1 billion/year is a huge success and only sell half of their own estimates, I want to see a normal success - I'm not even talking about a failure...

    8. Re:Microsoft's mission by i_luv_linux · · Score: 1
      It is not about now, it is about future.

      PocketPC used Arm processors. Palm used the Dragonball with longer battery life, but now they changed to Arm processors, Xscale too. Now as the component prices for PocketPC go down, and the batter life goes up, what will happen to Palm. Palm had the advantage but MS played it for the future and it seems that they are winning.

      Regarding TabletPC, once you get better battery life, these devices will be part of everyday life. You won't need anythingelse. They will sell like PCs today. Tablet PC is not a necessity now of course, some people will use it, but it won't be a big hit in our daily life.

      Instead of downplaying MS products, do something that can compete with it.

    9. Re:Microsoft's mission by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Size of screen. I WOULD like to read in the train with these things, download books, browse the newspapers, etc. There's always a way to add a small keyboard when you have the $.

      Also, for watching movies in a train, bus, whatever, using it as a portable DVD player, as a portable Audio Center.

      It's just a spreamlined PC slim and without big moving parts or lots of cables. Chances are this tables will be widely used when Wireless becomes widespread. Both concepts reinforce themselves.

      Would be nice if it had a slot to Dock your (small) PDA and access it in a remote way (ie: as a window in your tablet, and drives mounted as /pda). Very very handy!!

      Most people will use to take porn everywhere (bath, office, etc :), so may be usefull for them also :) :)

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    10. Re:Microsoft's mission by tshak · · Score: 2

      XBox: Huge.

      Looking at my PS2 (WITH multitap and HD upgrade) side-by-side with my XBox there's not THAT big of a difference. Laptops are small, and also cost a lot more to build.

      Loud? Well, I have my evidence, you have your opinion.

      Fragile: Plastic is mutable. Well, then all consoles are fragile and it's a moot point.

      Power-Consuming: Again, I cite laptops. How come a laptop can have a GF4 and 60GB and run off a battery fine. Let's see, my Inspiron 8200 does not run off a battery "fine" (not even 2hrs on 1 batt if playing games). First, the Gf4 is an MX which is actually LESS powerful then the XBox's GPU. Second, as I already mentioned Laptops are much more expensive to build because of their small size. Laptops are a very poor comparison.

      $150 loss: the XBox was INITIALLY made from the cheapest parts to keep costs down.
      Uhm, cost of XBox production has gone down since day 1, as with all other consoles. This is simple economics, and it applies much more in the x86 market because of x86's ubiquity.

      Personally, I hold the GC is very high respect. So do I. I didn't at first because of A) it's crappy controller (quality of parts is really poor, and it looks like a toy), and B) it's launch titles. Now that the GC has matured, I'll definitely pick one up once 3rd parties come up with higher quality controllers with analog sticks that I'm not afraid to break off.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    11. Re:Microsoft's mission by tshak · · Score: 2

      XBox fanboy? More like Fact Fanboy. PS2 had a 12-14month lead, not a 2 year lead. If you look at some of the games on the XBox and compare them to the PS2 (since I have both I can do that very well), there is a HUGE difference, unless of course you're talking about "cross-platform ports" which then yields a minor difference. Screenshots don't do any console justice. Also, don't forget the 256channel sound with 5.1 dolby digital (it really is quite amazing) - it's not just about the graphics.

      And, please go take an economics course. Investing into 1 billion into the platform (with approx 1billion left for XBox2) is NOT a 1billion/year loss.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    12. Re:Microsoft's mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to start another console war... OK. I am. sue me.

      We have established that the xBox is the largest console in history, and no one disputes that. check

      The xBox is noisy. Granted, when you are playing Halo with the volume maxed, it make no difference. But, when you are trying to sneek a game in at 3:00AM when the rest of your family is sleeping, it interferes with your ability to hear the game and not the console. I think the Cube wins here.

      Fragile? I think it would be incredibly stupid for a console manufacturer to make a fragile console. Granted, an HD can take less punishment than any other hardware, however it can still take a licking and keep on ticking. I don't think any console could be deemed fragile.

      Power hungry. Yeah. I am pleased with the power savings achieved by my cube, but really. How much power does the Box eat? 200watts? 300watts? If it is less than a 13 inch tv, it's ok, in my opinion. What gets my goat (no goat sex jokes please) is the amount of power that goes to heat. If Intel could make more efficient chips, that would be great. Then it would solve most of the xBox's problems (power consumption, speed, heat, size).

      As for processing power? I recall Activision saying (on Extended Play, I believe) that any game they can make for one console, they can make for the others. Granted, these guys work miracles in the graphics department, but think about it.

      I love my GCN and I wouldn't buy an xBox if you paid me... well... ok I would, but not from my money. I have been burned by MS too much to try it. However, I can see why others like it and I respect their opinions.

      And one final note before we leave (I gots me homework to do!): it is not the system or the numbers, it is the quality, quantity, and genre of the games available for the system. If you like Animal Crossing, you aren't going to buy an xBox.

      Wait! What was this thread about? Mod: -25 off-topic :-) Must rescue score...

      Tablet PC? Umm... those look like laptops with cheesy swivel screens that are prone to failure. I think for a tablet PC, I'll use the rumored Dell Pocket PC for $200, should it exist... If I wasn't burned by MS so much. In my case, I'll check out those fancy PalmOS 5.0 devices.

    13. Re:Microsoft's mission by rtechie · · Score: 1

      The XBox is certainly, technically, the superior platform over the PS2 and Gamecube. It has the most powerful CPU and graphics as well as the extra features of a hard disk and broadband standard. Certainly there is great potential there. But what we've seen in the past is that it's marketing and game selection that drives console sales, not technology.

      There have been complaints about the size and the oversized controller. But frankly, the XBox still is smaller than most home A/V components and there are plenty of third-party controllers for the XBox. I hated the standard Dreamcast controller but I found several third-party controllers that I liked.

      The big problem the XBox has is games. The PS2 has enough of a lead, as well as Sony's great marketing and strong relationships with developers (particularly Japanese developers) has insured that the PS2 will ALWAYS have more games than the XBox and more games means more GOOD games. This allows the PS2 to appeal to a funamentally wider audience. And I'm not even including the huge back-library od PS1 titles.

      The Gamecube is rapidly evolving into a niche console for kids and people that worship Mario and Zelda. This suits Nintendo just fine, they've been making money off the Gamecube from day 1 and the Gamecube is really secondary to the real cash cow, the GameBoy.

      It's Microsoft that has trouble. They're competing directly against PS2 for the teen/young adult market. XBox is doing okay in the US, but they've basically conceded the Japanese market and the XBox isn't looking goog in Europe.

      As I've said before, unless broadband gaming (where Microsoft has a clear advantage) takes off in a BIG way, XBox will be a commercial failure. I think it's alrealy lost the marketshare "battle", but if Microsoft can manage to be marginally successful with the XBox, Microsft has enough cash to make the XBox2 a success.

  31. /. effect in action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The video download on the acer site is downloading @ 12kb/s, instead of a usual 60kb/s for a 512k/bit pipe

  32. Recollections from '98 story by rakeswell · · Score: 1

    I recall reading about this in the NY Times in '98 or '99 (in newsprint). From what I can recall from he story, the tablet pc idea was one that has been attempted and aborted by many big hardware players for a long time, and the view taken by the story was that MS's success was a long-shot, tempered, however, by the fact that the product was seen has a very high priority within the company.

    The thing that stood out in my mind, however, was that the story indicated that the general wisdom of the time was that consumers could care less about a "tablet" PC, but it was being persued because technologists thought it was a cool thing to do.

    Personally, I think it sounds cool, but I'd rather use a laptop: I hate using styli for anything other than 'point-and-click'.

    --
    All one has to do is hit the right keys at the right time and the instrument plays itself. - Johann Sebastian Bach
  33. Handwriting on a Screen by dlevitan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've used a palm for a long time, but I've realized one thing - writing on a piece of plastic is nothing compared to writing on a good sheet of paper. For example, my signature is consistent on paper. With the electronic signature things more stores are getting, I have a problem with my signature because the tablet doesn't feel the same way as paper. It seems like too little friction or something, but it doesn't doesn't feel right. So until I can write on real electronic paper that feels like paper, I don't think I want to spend another $500 on a tablet pc that I'll end up being annoyed with.

    1. Re:Handwriting on a Screen by BigJimSlade · · Score: 2

      Note: all the devices you have just described use some sort of presure-sensitive input mechanism. It remains to be seen if the electro-magnetic mechanism used on these Tablet PCs will be any better, but it will be different.

    2. Re:Handwriting on a Screen by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      I've used a palm for a long time, but I've realized one thing - writing on a piece of plastic is nothing compared to writing on a good sheet of paper. For example, my signature is consistent on paper. With the electronic signature things more stores are getting, I have a problem with my signature because the tablet doesn't feel the same way as paper. It seems like too little friction or something, but it doesn't doesn't feel right.

      I think probably the problem in the past with writing on screens has been inaccurate pen detection coupled with low resolution ("pixely" outut). If these two things are gone, I don't see any reason why it can't be like writing on paper with a high quality (low friction) pen.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:Handwriting on a Screen by samdu · · Score: 1

      Get a WriteRight screen protector for your Palm. It works wonders for writing feel and accuracy as well as protects your screen.

    4. Re:Handwriting on a Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I got my learner's permit they had me sign my name on a tablet thing and I fucked up and spelled me name wrong. I don't know how much of this was because of the tablet and how much was because I only write in cursive like twice a year, but what I do know is that now the signature on my driver's license isn't technically my name. Hehe...

    5. Re:Handwriting on a Screen by arakon · · Score: 1

      You think you can get one of theses marvels for $500?

      Hook me up!

      My interest in it is as an artist, these things are great for photoshop work on the go. You ever tried to use a laptop for photoshop work?
      Screw handwriting, just get one of those fold up keyboards if you want to do some serious writing.

      --
      "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
    6. Re:Handwriting on a Screen by wfrp01 · · Score: 2

      It remains to be seen if the electro-magnetic mechanism used on these Tablet PCs will be any better

      You know, MS has always made a pretty good mouse. Perhaps that's their future: input devices. Hey, a guy can dream, no?

      Just to ramble... What if this electromagnetic input really is good gonzo? And for the sake of argument, let's say MS holds a patent on the technology. If they manufacture the hardware in a closed shop and don't publish the specs, then they can compell anyone who wants to use their hardware to use their OS. Maybe MS wants to be more like Apple: use proprietary hardware to move your software.

      --

      --Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
  34. Text recognition by hopbine · · Score: 4, Funny

    If the handwriting recognition software is as good as they say it is, give one to every doctor - that way we will all understand the damn prescriptions.

    --
    Semper ubi sub ubi
    1. Re:Text recognition by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      That's why pharmacists have to study so long. It's not the chemisty and stuff like that that makes it hard, but all the courses of "handwriting decryption" and "graphology". ;-)

    2. Re:Text recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of the VA hospitals now use electronic records. They generally have a bunch of PC's on carts. No reason to lug a poratble around when it could be installed in the wall outside the room or dangled from the ceiling...

  35. write where i want it? by digitalsushi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Swap the stock photo girl out with Heidi Wall chicken-scratching GIMP under X windows, and I'll buy one. Tell me I can bash alias a frowny face to /dev/null and I'll buy two. Tell me someone's working on a GUI iptables interface where I can flick digital bugs with my index finger, and I'll swap out my router. And if I can get it with an at&t natural voice Majel Barrett module, I'll wet my pants and run around in little circles. Now to resurrect a cliche- will it run linux? oops, I mean, how long til it runs linux?

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    1. Re:write where i want it? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      'run Linux' is such a subjective thing. Many of the platforms that 'run Linux' just barely wobble along running it. I.e. most people aren't that entralled to get a Bash prompt to sit and look at.

      Personally, I have grown to like a truly robust cross-platform OS, namely NetBSD. It's not just a kernal, it's got a full consistent userland and ports system that transports to every architecture it runs on. Not just an inconsistent wad of utilities and apps that someone calls a 'distro.'

      'How long til it runs NetBSD' is consistently a more interesting question, but since this is a forum dominated by GNU-heads it seldom gets asked.

    2. Re:write where i want it? by RustyTaco · · Score: 1
      'How long til it runs NetBSD'
      You mean it doesn't already? We've got rigged demos of the thing and it doesn't run NetBSD yet? Wow, they're gettin' slow ;)

      - RustyTaco
  36. crush it and snort it and it works better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have heard, but I have never done this, that if you crush the tablet and then snort it that it works better.

    But you might end up dead.

  37. off-topic, m$ security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thats funny...

    http://www.microsoft.com/germany/ms/officexp/sic he rheit/index.htm

  38. umm by claude_juan · · Score: 1

    kde, evolution, any office suite...

    i'm sure theres more.

  39. Don't be too sure by dsfox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft Research went on an incredible hiring spree in the mid 90s, Picking up a majority of the top researchers in some fields. I'm surprised more killer products haven't come out of there since, apart from the difficulty of bringing products from reasearch to production I always observered at Bell Labs.

    1. Re:Don't be too sure by jejones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Depends on MS's purpose in hiring them. It may be that as long as MS can keep the best talent from working for somebody else, it doesn't matter whether they actually produce anything at all.

    2. Re:Don't be too sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty certain they didn't just hire them to keep them off the market. Microsoft is very interested in new technology. The better their products are the more money they make. If their products were to stagnate they wouldn't keep raking in the upgrade fees and they thrive off of those fees.

    3. Re:Don't be too sure by NickFortune · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, I firmly believe that it'd make no difference. The corporate culture at MS is so corrupt that I don't think these guys would be allowed to write anything useful or innovative.

      They might be put in charge of finding new ways to disable competitors' products or shaft thier customers though - that's the only sort of innovation Redmond are interested in

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  40. You know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hitler produced some fine technology during his reign as well. Bill Gates in all fairness is nothing like Hitler(I actually respect him on his non-business side), but his companies business tactics must be considered at all times when discussing anything they produce. These are the same people who called Linux a cancer, pressured the government to outlaw the GPL, and are out to destroy us at all costs. Oh yea, they also happen to want to bankrupt every other technology company in the world.

    Just like Exxon, there is nothing that Microsoft can produce that isn't tainted by their business practices. If you think this isn't a war with MS then your flat out asleep at the wheel.

    That's why I object to the headline. It's not that it's not possible to MS to produce something that works well, it's just that its not possible for MS to produce something that doesn't support their "bad for the rest of us" monopolistic agenda.

  41. SonicBlue discontinued their pioneering tablet pc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good review of virtues and downfalls with SonicBlue's ProGear product.

  42. I've been to that presentation by NotoriousQ · · Score: 5, Informative

    and saw the tablet pc. Not all of those 150 people were rabid linux users. In fact I am quite certain there were not even 50. But you obviously misundertood what impressed the people. Noone cared that you could copy and paste ink. That is trivial. Annotations are passed through the bitmaps, as the guy specifically mentioned. Yawn. What impressed me and a ton of other people in the room was the kick ass handwriting recognition. I have not seen one that worked that well yet. For those of you who have not seen it, the recognizer is not line based, so it can form chunks of recognizable text at any position and angle. Nothing too mind boggling, but definitely a technical feat.

    --
    badness 10000
    1. Re:I've been to that presentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two of the new Acer tablets and they do no impress me. Part of that could be the fact that they are Acers; the quality is so poor. The screens are difficult to see under different lighting conditions, the pen/stlyus thing is far too light and wimpy ; it has a button for right cliking which hardly clicks.

      The handwriting recgonition is odd but good. While there is no need to use a Graffiti like alphabet, when the system translates from handwriting to text for inpput, the results are horrible. If the note or journal is kept as writing, then it seems just fine.

      I hope someone else's implementation, perhaps HPs is better than this.

    2. Re:I've been to that presentation by zenyu · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What impressed me and a ton of other people in the room was the kick ass handwriting recognition.

      Try writing fuck into it, won't work. It's not in their dictionary, you have to write one letter at a time, takes 3x as long as grafitti. I saw a PhD thesis with this level of handwriting regognition a couple years ago. It is impressive that it made it to market so quickly, but technically not very impressive.

      I do want one of those tablets though. It's got one of those Wacom tablets under the LCD which makes it like a real dynabook. The first prototypes I saw were completely unusable because the screen was so thick that you got lots of parallax. But the Acer doesn't have a glass covering the screen so it's completely usable. The glass used to be there to protect the LCD, so no heavy handed drawing on the Acer. Unfortunately the Acer is very fragile in many other ways too, but I think if Apple ever makes one of these it will be great.

      You don't use it as a tablet when browsing the web or writing anything significant. But if you want to draw something it is much nicer than a wacom tablet, you get feedback right under the pen. And since the screen is soft you get a better feel.* Unlike a PDA you have everything a Wacom tablet has, pressure sensitivity, pen angle, and accuracy. The handwriting recognition is fine for writing the small anotations it's intended for, just insert your words into the dictionary first.

      *BTW if you've tried a Wacom tablet but didn't like it, fastening a piece of paper on top of the drawing surface gives it a much better feel. You get some of that friction you get using a pencil on paper.

    3. Re:I've been to that presentation by epgandalf · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was there too, assuming that we're all talking about the presentation at CMU yesterday.
      The handwriting recognition was really impressive. He had bad handwriting and it still recognized it. There was some handwriting that I even had trouble reading that was converted to text correctly. The tablet recognized handwriting from all angles, even upside down!
      As other people have mentioned, it is using a dictionary to figure out what you probably wrote. The only time that it messed up it read "This is a test" as "This is arrest." He then clicked on arrest and pulled up the alternatives. The closest thing there was atest, which he selected and then entered a space.

    4. Re:I've been to that presentation by tigertigr · · Score: 1

      Somebody demoed one of these Tablet PCs at my work and what really impressed me was the fact that, yes, the handwriting recognition was good, but also that you could search what you wrote. It's such a simple feature, but extremely useful. I like writing with pen in a pad to keep notes because it allows me to draw arrows and structure text in ways that I cannot do with notepad.exe or a word-processor. However, the downside with the pen and paper is that I cannot search through my notes easily without having to skim through each page. With a Tablet PC, I could still write in the same way, but then later be able to search through it all. That, to me, is a great feature.

    5. Re:I've been to that presentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to the presentation held at UCLA. It is a neat piece of hardware, the best part of the presentation was the short video the MS rep showed of the digital classrom and the tablepc. Is this video available on MS website somewhere? Its funny to the CS crowd

  43. I think maybe you do need to say something more by dsfox · · Score: 2

    Like, what your definition of hype is, and why each qualifies.

  44. WallsRSolid? by mrfantasy · · Score: 0, Troll
    Hmmm, maybe they need WINDOWS? Hello?


    Damn astroturfing.

    --

    -- Of course I'm paranoid. I'm a sysadmin.

  45. What is its goal? by SirCrashALot · · Score: 0
    I haven't read the exact specs yet, but is the designed to be an all purpose computer, i.e. replaces laptop, pda, paper+pen, or is it a niche device. The article said that MS's design idea was to make it easy and natural to use so that anyone can use it. How does this factor with handwriting recognition. Who writes in book? Graffiti takes a long time to learn, and I still make mistakes with it.
    Windows XP Tablet PC Edition also enables users to interact with their PC in more natural ways by writing directly on the screen using a digital pen, in addition to using a traditional keyboard and mouse.
    I think the idea is really good, but I don't think everyone should throw out their laptops just yet.
    1. Re:What is its goal? by davisshaver · · Score: 1

      I hope they use something like Newton's hand recqonition. I know I'm preaching to the choir, but i think thats the best one out there at this time.

      --
      "What we have here is a failure to communicate"
      The Warden, Cool Hand Luke
  46. In-freaking-credible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At Carnegie Mellon (the university in question) there are an awful lot of Slashbots who'll parrot knee-jerk reactions to Microsoft and even mock them while stealing their free food. When it comes time to get a job, of course, everyone promptly shuts up and starts applauding.

    Those who don't let go of their childish name-calling do not escape from CMU. They become staff.

  47. fun for artists by kisrael · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Tablet technology seems like it would be great for doodlers and maybe other artists, depending on the sensitivity of the input device. It'll be great when my big ol' LCD monitor can be taken off of its stand and used on my lap for a bit of drawing.

    On the other hand, right now, when I see the pictures all I can think is that it looks like a comically over-seized PDA.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    1. Re:fun for artists by tchapin · · Score: 1
      Hi Kirk!

      You mean, like this one?

      Todd

      --
      -- !todd erases a red dot! I steal music on the internet.
    2. Re:fun for artists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Or this?
      Wacom Cintiq

  48. guerilla marketing by jonbrewer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Again I believe Slashdot has fallen victim to guerilla marketing. Were the poster in fact a real person, they would have linked to their university.

    The post might as well have been straight from a textbook. No facts, just unsubstantiated hype.

    The question is: who is the poster working for? Acer? Microsoft?

    (And the next question is, why is Taco falling for this shit?)

    1. Re:guerilla marketing by Zorikin · · Score: 1

      Maybe poster would like to remain anonymous, given his "Microsoft shill" status.

    2. Re:guerilla marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think so, a marketer wouldn't be so overt and glowing.

    3. Re:guerilla marketing by Damion · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, WallsRSolid is a friend of mine. The university in question is Carnegie Mellon. Microsoft really was here last week, and the reaction to them really was, in all truth an honesty, a positive one.
      I've been absolutely astounded on the number of people in this discussion who have completely blown off the topic. Microsoft does produce some quality products, and they are very attractive as employers (the purpose of the visit was one of recruitment), despite all of the Evil Empire BS that flies around.

      --
      Common sense is what tells you the world is flat.
    4. Re:guerilla marketing by connor_macleod · · Score: 1

      Interesting thought - I was thinking about this the other day. Has anyone discussed this before? It's gotta be worth a hell of a lot in PR for a product or a service to get a decent slashdot post. Not saying anything agains the /. crew - they're editors's - PR people use editors and journos every day. How often do you reckon PR people are making successful posts?

      Again, this comes back to the 'story moderation' idea - this could weed out biased posts.

    5. Re:guerilla marketing by Curt+Cox · · Score: 1
      Damion, both you and WallsRSolid are quite easily astonished

      If all is as you claim, you should step back, do some more homework concerning pen computing, and look at this story more objectively. Microsoft has been a long-time player in pen computing, but never an innovator. Bringing an existing technology into the Microsoft-only world doesn't count as innovation.

      If the submission had consisted of technical specifications and details, they would have been discussed. Geeks eat details. Instead, the submission consisted of vague adjectives. That makes discussing the vague adjectives on-topic.

      Microsoft makes some quality products. Until they decide that none of their products need to be marketed by illegally abusing their monopoly, their marketing hype will be subject to more scrutiny than their competetors.

  49. Tried one yesterday by joebp · · Score: 5, Informative
    My dad got one of the Acer's a few days ago in order to test his company's software on it. I had a go in the local cybercafe down the road.

    Pro's:

    Nice feeling pens (there are two)

    The swivel idea is nice, abeit a little fiddly.

    It looks cool!

    It's pretty small and light

    Windows Journal is very nice

    Con's:

    Windows XP is as slow as a dog! I don't know what spec the machine is, but there is very noticable latency between clicking and menu's appearing for example. This might have something to do with it having an absolute shitpile graphics card.

    There is no positive feedback that you have clicked. A tiny click sound would improve usability 110%. This is where the whole thing really fails. I found myself reverting to the touchpad in a few minutes because it was just so frustrating to try and double-click.

    The onscreen keyboard is good, but the handwriting recognition is both crap and slow (about 1.5 seconds delay after writing 'jpixton').

    The screen has a protector on it which makes it rather reflective.

    Fiddly as fuck for clicking anything small. They really need to realise you can't just use a pen with windows which was designed to be used with a mouse. They need to alter the user interface to be more usable with a pen!!

    1. Re:Tried one yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should install Linux on it. Installing Linux makes things more faster and more better.

    2. Re:Tried one yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but there is very noticable latency between clicking and menu's appearing for example

      that's the fade effect introduced in Win2K, you can disable it if you stop your blind zealotry

    3. Re:Tried one yesterday by Riachu_11 · · Score: 1

      I've also used one, and they are actually pretty nice. *waits for boos, hisses, and "He's a M$ rep!" to be over* It's light, you could hold it on your arm like writing on a clipboard for quite some time. The stylus is a little annoying at first, for a few reasons: you have to press a little harder than you do with pencil and paper, and there's a little button on the side, like on Clickster mechcanical pencils, that opens up the right-click menu. Once you get used to it, it's fine. One other problem is clicking. It's hard to double click with the stylus because if you press hard enough for it to recognize, you're going too slow. Again, once you get used to it, it's fine. The writing recognition software didn't like my handwriting very much, but no one can read my handwriting and it converted my friend's just fine. The swivel screen seems like it would be a tad fragile, but most people aren't going to be throwing their laptops around anyway. One thing that I liked on the screen is that you can orient it whichever way you like, so the easier side to grab can be by your hand whether you're right- or left-handed. All in all, you're probably not going to like it much if you just need to jot down a phone number once in a while. For taking notes in a class though, or a meeting, it could be really great.

    4. Re:Tried one yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn off alkl the usless stuff that you have turned on (menu fades, shadows etc). They all greatly depend on a 3d acceartor to speed things up, and slow as hell without them. IF you turn it off, it's *very* fast on a more modeern computer

    5. Re:Tried one yesterday by ewhac · · Score: 2

      I realize it's disingenuous of me to select but a single remark as a basis for a lengthy Windows bash, but:

      Windows XP is as slow as a dog! I don't know what spec the machine is, but there is very noticable latency between clicking and menu's appearing for example. This might have something to do with it having an absolute shitpile graphics card.

      No, it has something to do with having an absolute shitpile OS.

      Extremely responsive user interfaces were developed over fifteen years ago on machines that had a 7 or 8 MHz MC68000 as their CPU. Maybe they had blitting hardware, maybe not. The definitely didn't have floating-point math HW. I'm referring of course to the Amiga and the Mac. (Atari ST owners can chime in on their own.)

      Here we are fifteen years later, and what have we got? A slow, poorly responsive user interface. Well, the pixels have gotten deeper, from two to 32 bits in some cases. So the machine needs to be 16 times faster to compensate, right? 16 * 7 MHz == 112MHz. National Semiconductor Geodes -- widely regarded as the cheapest pieces of crud currently available -- start at around 180MHz. Moreover, all machines these days have some kind of blitter, with anything from a 32- to a 256-bit bus. So the machine should be every bit as fast, if not faster, right?

      Since it's slower, this illustrates that the software is, as you say, an absolute shitpile. And don't try to hand me any rubbish about, "Oh, the OS has to do so much more than Amiga or MacOS did back then." There's only so much that could possibly need to happen between a mouse click and deploying a menu and, unless you're a complete muppet of a software programmer, there's no way those operations are going to perceptibly eat up a 180MHz CPU.

      Schwab

    6. Re:Tried one yesterday by smallstepforman · · Score: 2

      I love reading posts from former BeOS engineers on Slashdot. It puts things into perspective, especially considering BeInc's foray into Tablet PC's.

      --
      Revolution = Evolution
  50. cough...cough...cough by toupsie · · Score: 1, Troll
    cough...cough...Astroturf...cough...cough...Astrot urf...cough...cough. So what Getty stock photo does WallsRSolid use for his college yearbook?

    I remember these things when Windows 3.11 was around. Dumb idea then, dumb idea now. I can type faster than I write, plus how you are going to do "Control-Alt-Delete" with a pen?

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:cough...cough...cough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i believe they have a control-alt-delete button on the side.. also to make it secure for logon.

  51. Here's why by RainbowSix · · Score: 2

    Here is what floored everybody:

    You can open up a lecture slide on say, power point during a class, write notes on it in a spiraling circular fashion, then later search through your spiral scribble AS IF IT WERE TEXT. You write "foo," search for "foo" and "foo" in your hand writing will be highlighted.

    They did it during the presentation and it appeared to work very well.

    When I take notes in class I use paper and a pen because I like the variety in handwriting to help me remember things. If it were searchable... I'd buy on of these and I've used Linux exclusively for 2 years.

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  52. No keyboard? by payndz · · Score: 1

    It's of absolutely no interest to me, then. Even with just two fingers I can type a hell of a lot faster than I can write (and my handwriting is barely readable anyway), so a computer without a keyboard is to me - as a professional writer - as much use as a car without an engine. If I want to take a small computer with me on the road, I'll stick with my Psion Series 5, thanks!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
    1. Re:No keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you taken notes in a math class?

  53. Pretty neat by haunebu · · Score: 1

    I got to play with a few of the in Redmond a couple of weeks ago, and have to say they do look pretty cool. The pen thing is particularly neat - you can hold the pen up to about two inches away from the screen and the cursor still follows the pen. You can hover the pen just above the screen and drag it around. Really weird at first...

    --

    Blue skies, Barthy Burgers, girls...

  54. hmm what does this thing do by hfastedge · · Score: 0

    all it seems to do is handwriting recognition, thats all i could determine from the ms research site.

    I wonder what mystical powers that team of psychologically astute marketrons made u think u could do with your handwriting...

    --

    -- -- --

    Help my mini cause: My journal

  55. This will fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My handwriting is terrible and only the most talented people can create computer readable handwriting. Plus I wont be able to use it with out a mouse. Heck i can't even use a laptop without a USB mouse plugged in at the back, so this should fail miserablly just like the XBOX did.

  56. Well done those fellows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "cheered Microsoft...", is someone on drugs?

  57. in related news.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    ms held a summercamp for employees children and all of them absolutely loved all ms software.

    when interviewed one of them said .net will dominate the world because it's so cool, and showed his cool watch to prove it.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  58. Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But "Microsoft's concept"? Please. Not to mention they're taking a generic term, "tablet PC" and trying to make it a branding of their own product. Ridiculous.

    And this surprises you precisely how? Newsflash: Water Still Flows Downhill! Details at 11.

  59. What will they think of next by niall2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First Microsoft reinvented computing by giving us Windows 95 and now the tablet PC a little over eight years later in 2003. Brilliance.

    First Apple reinvented computing by giving us the Macintosh in 1984 and now the Newton a little over eight years yater in 1993. Brilliance.

    I guess the real question is when did PARC come up with all of this. 1978?

    --
    Today is a gift. Save the receipt.
    1. Re:What will they think of next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PARC came up with a terrible mrketing and bosses who dumped a revoultianry computer in teh trash, where it took everyone else about 12 years to recreate in full. Apple came close, but they left out things like stressing object orientated programing.

    2. Re:What will they think of next by MouseR · · Score: 2

      Actually, the Newton was the fruition of some concepts dreamt of years before which were bound together into a concept design called the Knowledge Navigator.

      This Knowledge Navigator also is the origin of Bill Atkinson's HyperCard and HyperScript language, the later being the ancestor of what became the AppleScript language.

    3. Re:What will they think of next by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Compare Newton to a Palm... sure.

      Compare Newton to a Tablet PC... whatever!

      (Have you actually tried one? I have!)

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  60. Anyone remember 'Pen' computing by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 3, Informative
    It was all the rage in the early 90s, with every PC company trying to jump on the bandwagon plus a couple of companies dedicated to it as a single concept. MS jumped in with their product which quickly squashed anyone doing actual innovative work, and people quickly realized that all the talk about handwriting recognition was mostly hype. Clearly there is demand for products like this if they can get it right, and it makes great marketting hype even if they don't.

    Clearly there is demand for this type of thing if it is well done and well integrated, but there is little to be learned from a rigged demo. The technology background piece has some interesting tidbits, but it doesn't seem like any of the interesting research is coming from MS in the first place.

    If we are lucky, some interesting hardware will be built with higher quality input devices, and maybe that will spark some good research. Research is better done in open source, so hopefully the hardware drivers will be available to make this work in Linux.

  61. This is super-exciting! by standards · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is super exciting! Just a few questions!

    Microsoft just finished a week-long series of lectures and demos at my university

    What university?

    the product that really stole the show was the Tablet PC. I was in a room with probably 150 hardcore linux users, and it seemed to me that the demonstration just floored them (the entire lecture hall CHEERED a Microsoft product).

    What did they cheer for, other than nebulous "amazement?"

    I believe that Microsoft's own online hype literature is insufficient in describing just how powerful their Tablet concept is.

    What hype are you refering to, and exactly how is their "hype literature" insufficient?

    Oh, and the input stylus is electromagnetic, not pressure-sensing

    How is that better? Is an electromagnetic stylus a requirement of the Microsoft technology?

    ANY document (not just MS) can be annotated

    Can I annotate OpenOffice documents?

    the journal software is AMAZING in its power and flexibility.

    What exactly does it do that's powerful and flexible?

    More details please! I don't feel the amazement yet - perhaps you could tell us all why we should be amazed! Then we'll love you!

    1. Re:This is super-exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What university?

      No doubt the University of Phoenix!

    2. Re:This is super-exciting! by generic-man · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your anti-Microsoft advocacy is priceless. By countering hype with FUD, you will go far on this Internet-site.

      What university?

      Carnegie Mellon University.

      What did they cheer for, other than nebulous "amazement?"

      They cheered for the fact that their product blends handwriting recognition with Windows applications that are already in widespread use. Advantages over Palm OS: Larger, color screen; easier ability to add wireless. Advantages over Newton: Tablet PC has a large company actively backing it; larger, color screen; compatible with Office and other widely-used applications. Advantages over Linux: the hwr-devel kernel module has been stuck at version 0.2.5a since 1997, and doesn't support any hardware made in the time since then.

      What hype are you refering to, and exactly how is their "hype literature" insufficient?

      Their hype literature, like many such pages, is pretty shallow.

      How is that better? Is an electromagnetic stylus a requirement of the Microsoft technology?

      Yes.

      Can I annotate OpenOffice documents?

      Yes, with the openoffice-hwr-devel module, currently at version 0.0.1a on SourceForge. If you'd like to see this technology implemented, write it yourself. That's the power of open source.

      What exactly does it do that's powerful and flexible?

      It lets you use handwriting recognition.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:This is super-exciting! by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      the openoffice-hwr-devel module, currently at version 0.0.1a on SourceForge

      cool, man! i can contribute artwork for the icon!

    4. Re:This is super-exciting! by Mydron · · Score: 1
      Hello Bill,

      Advantages over Newton

      If MS's Tablet PC has to compare itself to the Newton, technology that's 5 years old, then that says quite a bit!

      Yes ... write it yourself. That's the power of open source

      By that logic, all software products have every feature imaginable, it is merely a trivial matter of implementation. What a wonderful world we must live in!

    5. Re:This is super-exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If MS's Tablet PC has to compare itself to the Newton, technology that's 5 years old, then that says quite a bit!

      It doesn't have to. I merely included the comparison to pacify Slashbots who obsess over their 5-year-old technology.

    6. Re:This is super-exciting! by standards · · Score: 2

      OK, now I understand that "hard-core" Linux users cheered...

      "for the fact that their [Mircosoft's] product blends handwriting recognition with Windows applications"

      Hmmm, I can see people being impressed by handwriting recognition, so I assume that it's many many steps up above the stuff in the old Newton. Did you try it out? How did it do with your handwriting?

      Other than using handwriting as an input device, was there anything else that led to cheers?

      It was mentioned that any app can take advantage of this. Does that mean I can just plunk in my old Word '97 and have it use all these annotation and handwriting features? Or does my app have to be modified to take advantage of these features?

      I kind of assumed that any future tablet product would be capable of handwriting recognition... hopefully better recognition than that of PDAs of today and yesteryear. And I kind of also assumed that it'd be fairly easy to annotate documents with marks, like the Newton did. And being a Microsoft product, I assumed that it'd run MS-Office.

      Can someone who was there explain this a little better? Did anyone get their hands on the hardware and take it for a spin?

      By the way, what was the name of the lecture series? Is there a web site? Since this was sponsored by CM, there must be... feel free to email it to me or post it here.

    7. Re:This is super-exciting! by generic-man · · Score: 3, Informative

      Regrettably, I did not get to try it out with my own (terrible) handwriting. I'll have to wait until it's on sale at CompUSA so that I can play with it firsthand. It can do things that the Newton couldn't, such as recognizing handwriting written on slopes or curves. Also, it can remember text associated with handwriting while still displaying the handwriting. (You search for "foo," it highlights your handwritten "foo.") I'm not sure about the Newton's ability to do this.

      No idea about whether it works with anything but the latest and greatest Office apps. Someone else mentioned OpenOffice, for which support is unlikely; Microsoft has nearly EOLed Office 97, so that's unlikely as well.

      The lecture series was called "Microsoft Days @ CMU," and was sponsored by Microsoft with the support of the School of Computer Science. Microsoft paid the bills; SCS provided the rooms. While it was promoted heavily through direct e-mail campaigns and on-campus flyers, the web presence for it is limited to a calendar entry on the SCS web site and a plug on Microsoft's College site. You may also want to contact Assistant Dean for Industrial Relations Catherine Copetas for any direct inquiries.

      Hope this helps.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    8. Re:This is super-exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time read the article, MORON!

  62. I never trust MS presentations... by SwedishChef · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first one I attended was for an introduction of Frontpage along with NT4. Very posh circumstances in Bellevue with catered food (this was back in the "good ol' days). The demonstrations were slick beyond belief, done by smart, attractive people who did amazing things simply and easily. They gave us CDs with NT server, SQL server, Frontpage and NT workstation (all time-limited) and I was impressed enough to try them all.

    Oddly enough, nothing worked as well for me as it did for those smart, attractive demonstrators. Perhaps I wasn't smart (or attractive) enough but it seens more likely to me that the demonstrations were carefully staged to only show the best side of the product and hide any flaws.

    Of course, most presentations are like this... but this one sticks in my mind as a stark example. I've warned all our people to view all such "dog and pony shows" with a good deal of skepticism... but this goes double for those done by MS, in my opinion. What you see may not be what you get.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:I never trust MS presentations... by glenstar · · Score: 2

      As with most large presentations, MS presentations are almost always rigged. I spent a brief period at Microsoft Consulting Services and we created several "demos" that were rather elaborate in the way they made it *look* like something was really happening. However, you can't blame MS for that... any smart person would try to limit the unknown factors in a presentation to thousands of people. That's just smart business. A bit misleading, perhaps... but smart business.

    2. Re:I never trust MS presentations... by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

      Well there's always the little hints that give these smart and attractive people away. Try asking them a technical question that's tangentially related to what they oh so intelligently presented.

      Once at University of Waterloo we had a pretty impressive MS presentation that included Microsoft Money. I went for the food. Anyway, after there was a group huddled around the main presenter and he went off saying why money is so good. He says: "It's got 25 million lines of code! More than windows!" I walked away at that point.

      simon

    3. Re:I never trust MS presentations... by MasonMcD · · Score: 1

      Yup.

      My wife is in marketing, and recently at a healthcare tradeshow. HP was showing off a tablet for the healthcare industry, and it looked pretty geewhiz.

      One of the IT directors for a hospital asked how waterproof it was, and the HP rep said "waterproof?"

      The IT guy said, "Yeah, this thing is going to get all sorts of fluids on it, needs to be cleaned/sterilized, it'll get dropped, etc. How durable is it?"

      And the HP rep said "Gee, we didn't think about that."

      Obviously, lots of homework still needs to be done.

    4. Re:I never trust MS presentations... by vsprintf · · Score: 2

      That's just smart business. A bit misleading, perhaps... but smart business.

      Sorry, I'm not gonna buy that. I don't think "misleading" prospective customers or stockholders or auditors or anyone else is "smart business". I think it's fraud, and the perpetrators should be sent away for awhile to reflect on the concept.

    5. Re:I never trust MS presentations... by glenstar · · Score: 2
      What I was speaking of was setting up presentations/demonstrations in such a way that they *cannot fail*, which, in my opinion is much different than fraudulent behavior. Realize that the majority of these demonstrations happen months before an actual product is *released*. There are bound to be problems with the product at that stage, but you must show the audience what the product *will* do. So long as the presenting company follows through with what they have shown in the presentation, I see no problem.

      Now, misleading on financial matters is an entirely different story.

    6. Re:I never trust MS presentations... by vsprintf · · Score: 2

      So demonstrating vaporware as a working product to prospective customers who will write huge checks for it gives you no heartburn, and you see no problem with that?

      Sorry, I went to an older school where ethics were important. Times change, I guess.

    7. Re:I never trust MS presentations... by glenstar · · Score: 2

      Come on! I didn't say vaporware... I said creating a demonstration that will not crash... and I also said that was acceptable only so long as the demonstrator followed through on their promises.

    8. Re:I never trust MS presentations... by LogicalRealism · · Score: 1

      I went to a Tablet PC presentation at in June, at the ASEE Conference in Montreal.

      At the end, they let us mess around with the Acer model, and I found the results to be very, very good.

      I'd never use it for text input, but for sketches or adding sketches to class notes (I'm at an engineering college- never know whether to take notes on laptop or on paper) it would be great.

      Anyway, I've gone on a bit of a tangent, but the point I was trying to make was that we could verify for ourselves that it was not rigged by trying it.

    9. Re:I never trust MS presentations... by vsprintf · · Score: 2

      Come on! I didn't say vaporware... I said creating a demonstration that will not crash... and I also said that was acceptable only so long as the demonstrator followed through on their promises.

      From previous posts, at the time you do this demo, there is no integrated product that actually works (without crashing). Therefore, I have to see your demo as one of a nonexisting product (commonly called vaporware). And unless you happen to be Bill Gates, how can you guarantee the company will follow through on the promises implicit in this (faked) demo?

  63. Tablet PC by yar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Microsoft is hyping the tablet PC because it uses their Operating System (Windows XP Tablet). Several companies are coming through with the hardware, including Acer, Compaq, and Motion. My university has had demonstrations of all three, a couple of them MS sponsored.

    In our demonstrations Microsoft never claimed credit for the tablet concept, and the demonstrators did acknowledge that the idea has been around for some time. They are selling the difference in that a) the new tablet PCs are now affordable and b) the OS can run anything Windows XP can run.

    For approximately the price of a laptop, you get a somewhat more mobile but less powerful laptop. Acer's includes an integrated keyboard. They are nifty, but I wouldn't say that the Linux users in the audience stood up and cheered by any stretch of the imagination. Right off the bat they have their drawbacks. CD/DVD isn't integrated (which would be difficult at that size, although they have lots of ports to use), the voice recognition is still somewhat weak, and as I mentioned, they are somewhat less powerful than laptops at the same price. On the other hand, people can carry them around like they're a pad, people can annotate in any program, it makes using drawing programs a lot better, and it has the best handwriting recognition software I've ever encountered (that is what impressed me the most).

    All in all, they are selling the tablet PC as "an idea that's time has come." I don't know if that's true; if my area decides to support them I will probably use one, but I wouldn't go out and purchase one myself at this point.

  64. Blame it on expensive software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The price of MS Operatig systems got so expensive these days, that people had to give up keyboard and mice to be able to get a computer.

  65. Licensing conundrums commence! by Wylfing · · Score: 1
    What will really stymie this thing isn't its technological benefits (as thin and as late-to-the-party as they are). Licensing is what hampers Microsoft the most when it comes to mobile devices. They can't cope with the concept of one system spanning multiple devices, or with the OS becoming an invisible player; they have to turn everything into a standalone PC (or close variant) in order for their licensing to make sense.

    The standalone desktop PC model just isn't right for something like a mobile tablet. It should essentially be a thin client to a company server or to your actual desktop PC. But then it's not a standalone PC, and they can't abide that.

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
  66. Sounds perfect for watching porn DVDs in bed! by Subcarrier · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, the parent is not a troll. People have been trying to make a tablet PC for years and it simply doesn't sell. After all, it's just a laptop without a keyboard, which makes it unusable for any serious work and still too heavy to use as a home appliance.

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    1. Re:Sounds perfect for watching porn DVDs in bed! by VertigoAce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The pictures I saw made it look like it was a laptop that you could fold so that the keyboard wasn't showing (ie. you could use it as a laptop most of the time, but you could also use it in tablet form when convenient). The key is making the whole thing light enough that carrying around the keyboard when you're using it as a tablet isn't a pain.

  67. its a x86 laptop = foobar by johnjones · · Score: 2

    oh for gods sake people

    its just a x86 laptop with a touchscreen = open

    the funkyness that they all rave about is the ability to doodle all over the screen and so the software

    the real deal is if they put wince on a strongARM and use RDP + 802.11b to get to the x86 on your desk

    that would be fun because of the battery life and the fact that ARM is well supported in linux 2.4/2.5

    X11 term's on everyones laps
    (now that would be cool)

    regards

    John Jones

    1. Re:its a x86 laptop = foobar by cristofer8 · · Score: 1

      "the real deal is if they put wince on a strongARM and use RDP + 802.11b to get to the x86 on your desk "

      Check out mira.

  68. Re:damn, looks hot! by rainer3 · · Score: 1
    I'd hit it.

    Where are the boobies? Oh wait, this isn't a Fark story. Damn.

  69. WallsRSolid works for who? by nuzoo · · Score: 1

    And WallsRSolid works for who? ...either Microsquat or one of their numerous PR firms, of course.

    1. Re:WallsRSolid works for who? by teamonkey · · Score: 1

      Uh, didn't he say that he's a university student?

    2. Re:WallsRSolid works for who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Astroturfers certainly couldn't lie about something like that. Good catch!

  70. ROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Checkout Acer's propaganda page.

    The headline? "Write where you want it".

    Now imagine a "thought cloud" over Joe User: "I want it up the ass".

  71. Another victim of vaporware by TTL0 · · Score: 1
    I was at Comdex in 2000 and watched Bill Gates demo both the tablet PC as well as a XML enabled MS Word.

    One of the things MS does well is that it pre-announces products, thus keeping competitors away.

    --
    Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
    1. Re:Another victim of vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And last year Intel demoed Pentium 4s running at 3.0 Ghz. Those bastards are always lying. Of course, now Microsoft is releasing Tablet PC, Word 11 does save in XML, and Intel has shipped Pentium 4s running at 3.0 Ghz.

  72. Battery Life = 3.5 hours by loply · · Score: 2

    If you download the demo application, it states: "Power saving in the CPU architecture delivers an extended battery life of 3.5 hours".
    3.5 hours battery life?!?
    Does it mean 3.5 extra hours due to the CPU power saving, or am I right in thinking this thing has an overall battery life of 3.5 hours?

    1. Re:Battery Life = 3.5 hours by torgosan · · Score: 2

      Overall of 3.5 - on paper.

      Let's be practical and say it's ~2.5 or so [yes, pulled out of thin air but based on lots of experience with laptops/tablet PC's].

      IMNSHO, not nearly enough battery life is what users in the real world will see. Status quo, I'm afraid.

      --
      "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand". -Milton F.
    2. Re:Battery Life = 3.5 hours by LogicalRealism · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I recall thinking that was one of the downsides when I saw the demo (others being: no plans at the time to include it in larger laptops, not all that convenient use pen input and keyboard simultaneously (I can't write very well on a vertical surface).

      Maybe this OS extension married with the Banias setup? Yeah... I'd want one of those.

  73. The smell of microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Microsoft just finished a week-long series of lectures and demos at my university, and the product that really stole the show was the Tablet PC. I was in a room with probably 150 hardcore linux users, and it seemed to me that the demonstration just floored them (the entire lecture hall CHEERED a Microsoft product).

    Let me guess, you're at U of Toronto! I avoided the week long propaganda; usually microsoft presentations reeked with the smell of body odor. At least they have them in BA now and not the old cramped SF building!

  74. Microsoft (and others) have been here before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newton - was ment to be a tablet.
    Windows for Pen - Microsoft response.
    Various X86 in tablet format, running Win 3.11 WFW all the way to XP, with some CE devices.

    I'll believe the "tablet revolution" when I see it, because I've seen "the revolution" before.

  75. Nooooo!!!! by arvindn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't believe it! Its a big conspiracy... CmdrTaco has been bought. WallsRSolid works for Acer. Those 150 "hardcore linux users" were M$ employees with borrowed penguin T-shirts!!! I _knew_ they'd start something like this the moment Linus left for his cruise... This is MS FUD at its best!! I'd rather believe that RMS is cheering for Bitkeeper. Chant with me: "This is a Conspiracy, this is a conspiracy, this is a conspiracy ..."

  76. What would be really funny... by uradu · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is you having to excuse yourself for a quick trip to the photocopier every ten words or so.

  77. what are the alternatives for lecture notes? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here is my problem: my handwriting is awful, my typing skills are fairly decent. During the lecture I have to draw some charts or graphs -- sometime. I need something I can combine the typing with some minimal handwriting but fairly extensive drawing. Something not too big I can take with me in classroom. Seems like Palm/Pocket PC screen size is too small. Any recommendations?
    TIA.

  78. Microsoft is doing the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I am no fan of MS products and this is not flame bait. I am also not a Linux fanatic. I use what makes sense when it makes sense. My routers are linux based, my laptop runs XP. My image servers are linux.. my 3D workstation is XP.. whatever works best at the time. The development community at large seems to be missing the point.

    While linux folks have been busy hacking, reverse engineering, updating, and complaining about mainstream products, Microsoft has been quietly busy plunking away (in their own scary, plodding, increasingly buggy way) to get into the minds of consumers. XP, xp media center, and the tablet thingy are all going to be very effective. If the collective horsepower of the linux community had concentrated on an equivilant of XP media center (yes I know about freevo and the rest) and a tablet based solution, MS would be in big trouble. They (MS) are already doomed to lose the server battle in the long run, the linux community needs to concentrate on the consumer experience if they ever want to see Linux get used mainstream. There is nothing special about the MS tablet PC, all of this is perfectly possible in linux. Not only is it possible, it would also use less resources, be open source... yada, yada, yada.

    The problem is not MS, its the linux community focusing on all the wrong things..

    Every time I see 'how long will it be until someone gets linux ported to xxxx' I cringe. What a friggin waste of time. Who cares if you can port linux to some obscure device and create a following of 3 very avid users. That doesn't count for shinola in the big scheme of things.

    Don't put MS down for trying something new, ask yourself why such a large collection of big brain linux developers can't beat microsoft to the punch for once instead of playing a chasing game.

    1. Re:Microsoft is doing the right thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the linux way. Copy everything, create very very few things yourself. Instead try and make something better (ie more cryptic and harder to use, pretty much teh bane of *all* software with more features)

    2. Re:Microsoft is doing the right thing by Kourino · · Score: 1

      As much of a waste of time it is to reply to an AC, this showed up at threshold 1, so why not :3

      While linux folks have been busy hacking, reverse engineering, updating, and complaining about mainstream products, Microsoft has been quietly busy plunking away (in their own scary, plodding, increasingly buggy way) to get into the minds of consumers.

      I see. So they make slow, god-playing programs that crash but manage to get into the hearts of the people. Maybe it's not so much their design or good work that's commendable here so much as their marketing? Is that what you're trying to say? Or are you going somewhere else with this? I'm confused.

      If the collective horsepower of the linux community had concentrated on an equivilant of XP media center ... and a tablet based solution

      It must be pretty impressive indeed if it's become such a big hit without me having heard of it despite being surrounded by people who use XP. (Then again, I've been busy with school and coding lately, so who knows.)

      By the way, hacking software is a lot easier (and less costly) than hardware design. I'm not saying that an open source hardware movement isn't possible, but it's generally something that's kinda hard to do if you don't have a lot of money to sink into research, design, and fabrication. Maybe if RMS gets another few "genius grants", or I become wildly famous as a musician and make a lot of money.

      Every time I see 'how long will it be until someone gets linux ported to xxxx' I cringe.

      Do something for me. Go count the number of people working on (say) the Dreamcast and X-box linux ports. Now go count the number of people working on (say) KDE. Which one is bigger? Surely I need say no more.

      Don't put down MS for trying something new, ask yourself why such a large collection of big brain linux developers can't beat microsoft to the punch for once instead of playing a chasing game.

      Who's chasing? Linux is software. Tablet PC is hardware. Apples and oranges. If anyone's playing a "chasing game", it's Microsoft. Or haven't you heard of the Newton, or got the impression that this is kind of a $PDA on steroids? Well whatever, I have work to do :3

  79. Linux fans cheer, of course. by rapidweather · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IMHO, Linux users/fans will cheer for any os, hardware, etc. that is, in it's own right, a good thing. Regardless of who does it. Linux is just a "bathtub full of applications" isn't it? All kinds of stuff, from everywhere. When I am surfing the web with a linux/windows box, and I find a game, etc. that might be interesting to run on my Windows 98 partition, I just download it from my linux partition, and then reboot to Windows to go explore it, etc. Why should I keep the two os's separated on two different boxes? On the other hand, the typical Windows user has no linux partition on his machine, but I'll be willing to bet that most Linux users have Windows also, especially since HDD capacity now runs well over 30 GB in many machines. Now, the tablet pc can hold a linux installation, can't it? That's the real reason why "Linux fans cheer."

    1. Re:Linux fans cheer, of course. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "That's the real reason why "Linux fans cheer."

      I think the real reason that Linux fans are cheering is that MS did all the hard work. They had the machines designed and manufactured, they had a large team of engineers and QA make the things useful, and it's still a PC that does normal PC stuff. All the developers out there have to do is leech what MS has already done and throw it into a Linux distro.

      Mod me a troll if you like, but I'm a little annoyed at all these pokes taken at MS, but at least they find interesting ways of making their products useful. (note: I did not use the word invent, so spare me the 'MS stole from Apple who really stole from Xerox' crap.) Linux is still playing catch up in many ways to Windows (i.e. the useful UI) but isn't doing a whole lot to depart from it, at least from the end-user perspective.

      I fear that if MS dissolves like most of the /. Community wants, then Linux development will come to a virtual screeching halt. No innovation coming from that community.

      However, I may be wrong about that. I invite polite rebuttals. My perception may be wrong, and I'm open to information that could change my mind. I'm honestly not trying to troll here, just sharing my view and am willing to discuss that.

    2. Re:Linux fans cheer, of course. by websaber · · Score: 1

      If you read any of the previous posts you might see surprise surprise, that many die hard Linux users, myself included, actually like XP and in some cases BETTER than Linux! The question you have to ask yourself is how come after 20+ years microsoft finally come out with a half way decent OS? It's because they are (Very) slowly losing the OS war to Linux and they realize it. However I can see features that each side has gotten from the other (to numerous to list) and the answer is COMPETITION and research drives better designs not any one side or company.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    3. Re:Linux fans cheer, of course. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question you have to ask yourself is how come after 20+ years microsoft finally come out with a half way decent OS? It's because they are (Very) slowly losing the OS war to Linux and they realize it.
      I think they just had different priorities... MS took the "easy to use, 'rocksolid later'"-approach because that's where they probaby figured the money would be for them to keep building and eventually create a perfect consumer / allround OS - guess they were right, ... sofar. While you probably like it the other way around science first ... usability later. That might be the best approach for any given prject, too bad it not always the way the world works out.
  80. Tablet PC in person by Nexum · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've had an oportunity to use Microsoft's Tablet PC in person - A week or two ago a MS trailer was on the grounds of my University (Plymouth UK) mainly to shout about .Net, but they had a couple of TablePC's in the trailer too, one was an Acer, and I think the other was a Sharp.

    These are my personal impressions, your mileage may vary.

    First of all the handwriting recognition is not amazing. It does a fair job if you print in capitals, but writing joined up as neatly as possible gave unusable results. The recognition system really should have been better for the simple fact that when using a TabletPC you are not going to be leaning the device on table, but standing holding it in one hand with the pen in your other. This contributes to wobble (try writing neatly on a paper notepad with a pen while standing - notice your handwriting isn't so great?). So for a device like this, this is an important point - it should have been better, and as it is, I guess it's only *just* about passable.

    My other complaint about the handwriting is that the screens on both devices were very smooth, and this meant that there was very little tactile feedback when writing, which promotes large scribbly handwriting. Notice how when you use a normal pen and paper there is resistance as you write? This is not present and promotes bad handwriting.

    But enough about the handwriting - I really don't see how this is a revolutionary product. It's a laptop with handwriting recognition (and some have no keyboards).

    That is about it - and because of the form factor being so small on most of the available devices you lose out on a whole lot of functionality (DVD, good graphics HW, CD burning, Large HDD etc etc etc.)

    Plus, on the two devices Microsoft was showing off (so presumably the best two available devices) the battery life was appalling - at around 1 - 2 hours. For a portable device like this to succeed, we need to see 'day's use' longevity, which will probably realistically mean 6 -8 hours. So what gives, there are fully fledged notebooks available with TWICE the battery life of this device, which is supposed to be more personal and available 24/7 than a notebook.

    Plus (and it could be because I only had it for 20 mins) the way that Windows Tablet edition responds to the pen is very confusing, you write away and all of a sudden it thinks you are trying to press buttons, and all sorts of stuff gets clicked on, then it'll calm down for the last couple of words of your sentence and go back to recognising handwriting.

    And what's more, the two MS employees openly stated their pessimism for the devices, and admitted they had no idea how to use the interface.

    Plus - with the devices that are simply going to be like a notebook without the keyboard half (rather than the notebook like ones that have an actual keyboard that folds around to the back of the screen) how on earth is the screen protected? A pouch? A cover? If so - this seems more ungainly than a conventional ultralight notebook (Vaio, PowerBook G4 etc).

    And the things are *heavy*.

    Sorry, but I was very underwhelmed by the Tablet PC, and find it surprising to hear of this reaction (cheering, clapping) from *anybody* let alone people who you'd expect to understand more about the industry

    There is nothing special about the Tablet PC, it's *just a small notebook with handwriting recognition* - and my final justification is that apparently the devices will cost *A LOT* - thousands of GBP. -Peter

    --

    This sig has been deprecated.
  81. I smell a rat. by rindeee · · Score: 0, Troll

    Let me first say that I am not a Church of Linux zealot. Yes, I prefer Linux in most circumstances, simply where it works better. What strikes me about the parent post and various replies is the similarity in terminology (no stupid, not the fact that they all talk about tablet PCs). I smell a "panel poster". Maybe I'm just paranoid, but come on, seriously, a room full of people cheering a product (okay, maybe at MacWorld). The mere fact that this is pointed out and that it is added that included in the screaming fans were Linux folks. Hey, I'm probably wrong.

  82. Handwriting recognition - feh... by samdu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had a Palm III for many years. I was able to pick up Grafitti in about an hour. Now I have a Zaurus. The handwriting recognition is amazing. I almost never use it. I usually use the keyboard. No matter how great handwriting recognition gets, it'll never be as fast a competent (not great, just okay) typist. It simply takes longer to write words and letters than to type them. I don't see the advantage of the tablet PC thing (except for vertical markets). As I see it, Microsoft is merely attempting to manufacture a market that doesn't exist. It's all hype, but Microsoft will get credit for it when everyone wants one (why? because it's "new" and "cool"). I say thee FEH!

  83. OQO? by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 1

    Why all this hype? The OQO PC is really small, AND it has all the functions of a normal computer, which means you could potentially put Linux on it given the drivers. You could consider THAT a 'Tablet PC'.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:OQO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH MY GOD!!! That site is slow and annoying...

    2. Re:OQO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tablet PC" makes it sound like it is as big as one of those yellow legal pads. No, this is closer to the size of a book... I wouldn't consider it a "power" book. No, that gets reserved for the real thing from Apple. However, this looks to be more powerful than that Acer.

      2 questions....
      how much is it?
      where can I get it?

      wait! one more question...
      when can I get it?

  84. Believe! by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    I can't wait to get one...

    ...and see what it can do with Linux!

    I wonder if I can still get a refund on the price of Windows.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  85. astroturf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    touting a microsoft web page as a "behind-the-scenes" article? this submission reeks of p.r. babble and makes me very, very suspicious that this might be yet another astrotruf campaign from microsoft's p.r. factory.

    any details as to where this presentation was? any photos, audio, video of it? any confirmation of this (journo 101)?

    1. Re:astroturf by generic-man · · Score: 1

      This presentation was held on the afternoon of Saturday, October 26, 2002 in Wean Hall room 7500 at Carnegie Mellon University. I do not have any photos, audio, or video of it captured in a way that I can upload to the Internet, but it was real. Not every event has its own web site.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  86. Acer specs by Superpaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Optional 802.11b wireless LAN

    Optional? That seems a bit odd for a Tablet PC no?

  87. But it looks like M$ might deliver. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ThinkPad was crap.

  88. Nothing New - NEWTONs could save as ink, long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing new that's right. Saving electronic ink was common when digital recognition was no good. That alone speaks volumes about the quality this product.

  89. More balanced TabletPC storeis from ZDNet by BrerBear · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are here and here. Note that the first has a second page.

  90. All that is old will be new again by Multics · · Score: 5, Informative
    It would appear that someone at Microsoft learned how to read -- say for example: Computer Lib/Dream Machines [originally printed circa 1977 ] which describes Dynabook.

    At least they're smart enough to implement it coherently unlike a dozen or so who've tried previously. It sounds like this product is about 70% of what a Dynabook is supposed to be.

    -- Multics

    1. Re:All that is old will be new again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "It would appear that someone at Microsoft learned how to read -- say for example: Computer Lib/Dream Machines [amazon.com] [originally printed circa 1977 ] which describes Dynabook [artmuseum.net]."

      If you're implying that MS just decided to rip what they read in a book, I'm not inclined to agree with you. To tell you the truth, I don't think any one person can be credited with conieving of the idea of a computer that can replace the stack of papers on my desk.

      Here I am, 2002, and I'm still printing out documents and using a highlighter on them. When there's a change to a website that needs to be made, I still print the page, circle the area, and write the correction that needs to be made. I still have post-it notes all over my monitor. As much as I'd like to be paperless, there's still workflow to think about here.

      MS is tackling issues such as these. Part of what the Tablet/Office XP interface (as of marketing literature from a year ago, no idea if it's still true today) interesting is that it's supposed to let you draw on your documents. Unfortunately, I'm having difficulty finding out if they made good on that promise today. (Note for the PocketPC lets you do something like that...)

      Assuming they come close to living up to their promises, MS has a rather interesting product on their hands that has not been available before. And when I say not available, I don't mean 'stylus driven laptop', I mean "A portable computer running the de-facto desktop OS that utilizes a stylus similarly to how paper is used."

      I'm definitely curious about this product, and I can definitely see people cheering about it. Of course, my decisions remain reserved until I have one of these units to play with. Unfortunately, I don't 100% trust MS to make it non-obnoxious to use until version 3.

  91. MS invests in machine learning, was:I don't get it by Wile+E.+Heresiarch · · Score: 1
    I don't know if this particular product is really going to be the long-awaited breakthrough in multi-modal input, but: MS is headed in that direction and they're putting up the $$ to make it happen.

    As you know, MS has deep pockets, and they've used some of the money extorted from W95 lusers to fund serious research in machine learning. In my own research field (belief networks, shameless plug) they have hired several of the big wheels in the field. Patrice Simard used to work in neural networks; don't know what he's been up to lately -- you can probably find papers by him at Research Index.

    Recognition of handwritten characters is a hard, interesting problem; pattern recognition on bitmap images can only take you so far, and to go beyond that you need to start incorporating additional information such as stroke order and letter and word context. Voice recognition is even more difficult.

    The bottom line is that since there exist computers (namely our brains) that can reliably carry out text and voice recognition, we know it's possible. Getting there will require solving several substantial engineering problems, and it's possible a university department somewhere will carry through the solution, or perhaps a corporation that can afford to have a group dedicated to technology that won't pay off in the next three months... such as MS.

  92. Nice intro on slashdot, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the article doesn't say shit. Sounds like another overhyped MS product, thanks guys...

  93. What? That's it? That's totally LAME. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No offense, but if you're taking notes with a pen and paper, you're most likely missing a lot. Your WPM will be so terribly slow there is NO WAY you could catch everything. Typing will always remain king in this area. I can't believe a single person is really interested in that they can search their horrible handwriting. Have you ever signed your name at Best Buy on those digital pads, or from a UPS? Yeah, great, I cant WAIT to try and decypher what I just jotted down. Sheesh.

    I predict! Most money lost for MicroSoft for coming up with a TERRIBLE idea for a tablet PC!

    1. Re:What? That's it? That's totally LAME. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but if you're using a keyboard to take notes, you probably won't remember things as well as if you had used a purely kinesthetic method such as *writing the key words down*.

  94. Butter me up a tablet pc by VJTod · · Score: 1

    Who cares how long it takes to get nix onto one of these machines

    How long until the nix users realize this is just a stupid piece of hardware - the cool part is the outstanding handwriting recognition. Hardware vendors were never able to successfully get a tablet pc off the ground because the software behind the hardware was never sufficient.

    How long until someone gets recognition software of this quality running on any version of nix - prolly never.

    How long until http://www.fingerworks.com helps put out a tablet pc? That would be cool - I won't need a keyboard for the three finger salute. Mice are the work of the devil.

    The magnetic screen is better than pressure sense because it is more resilient to wear and tear - dropping the tab is probably not healthy for it.

    The magnetic screen is better than static boards because they are less/not sensitive to dirty screens. Heck I could butter up my tablet and still annotate my notes. Mmmmm butter.

  95. I have one of these... by sailor420 · · Score: 1

    I have one of these. Evaluation product from Acer. It is a very neat machine, but I think that is the extent of it. It exceptionally small, and the word rcognition software is amazing.... But I cant see it being too useful. Its a lot faster to type.

    Plus, that damn hinge is flimsier than Bob Dole's dick.

  96. What marketing crap. None of this is new. by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sheesh, Microsoft once again claims to have invented the wheel and everyone claps. Why is this?

    Tablet PCs have been around for more than a decade at least. Fujitsu has the Stylistic and Point lines (some of them very current and very powerful), Casio has the Fiva, Panasonic and Sharp have models, and even the IBM ThinkPad line was originally given its name because the first models were tablet PCs with essentially the same form factor. A number of smaller manufactueres have also been making high-end tablet PCs. Just go to eBay and search for 'tablet pc' and you'll se models running the gamut.

    Natural handwriting recognition that works has been around forever. The Newton line of PDAs (which admittedly had trouble in early revisions) had very accurate natural, full-speed handwriting recognition and the ability to annotate documents in ink on a largeish, screen by the mid-90's with the release of the 2000/2100 series. These things can open imported MS Office documents in NewtonWorks and you can mark them up to your heart's content. Meanwhile, Paragraph's Calligrapher (eventually to become Microsoft's Transcriber in a licensing deal) has been available for years for Windows CE tablet PCs (which aren't even mentioned among the models above) and also provided natural handwriting recognition and digital ink for annotating documents. The same Paragraph product for full-fledged tablet PC's was known as PenOffice and provided all of this functionality for users of Tablet PCs running full-fledged Windows. Even Microsoft has done this before (years before) with MS Pen Extensions.

    Why is it that Microsoft can always get away with digging up, licensing and/or copying a bunch of old technology that everyone has been before, then throwing a party and calling it their own new invention? It saddens me to think that ten years from now people will believe that MS invented the tablet PC, just like they now believe that Microsoft invented multitasking, databases, graphics, the mouse, the concept of application windows, and the Internet. :(

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:What marketing crap. None of this is new. by vsprintf · · Score: 2

      Why is it that Microsoft can always get away with digging up, licensing and/or copying a bunch of old technology that everyone has been before, then throwing a party and calling it their own new invention? It saddens me to think that ten years from now people will believe that MS invented the tablet PC, just like they now believe that Microsoft invented multitasking, databases, graphics, the mouse, the concept of application windows, and the Internet.

      Agreed. What I can't understand is that until about 10 years ago, Microsoft products were considered toy software, but now businesses act like there is no alternative to MS. It seems like we have a whole bunch of C?O's who swallowed that MS saves you money bullshit and are now behind the eight ball. With Microsoft's new rent-a-license terms, maybe some of them will come to their senses.

  97. /. desperation results more FUDgeFlinging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT wouldN'T matter much if the naykid furor bought ALL the preseNTation venues, in order to spew more evile deceptive payper liesense stock markup hostage ransom greed/fear based ?pr? FraUD, they'd still be Godless gottiesque .convicts, as far as we're concerned.

    VA lairy/rob et AL touting for the evile kingdumb, says IT ALL for me.

    wake up J., before you're DrOWned in a cesspool of billonlyus bs/megalomaniacal power&.control, disguised as yummy FUDge.

  98. apple dropped the ball? by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There goes my theory that Apple was going to bust open the tablet PC market. They have all the pieces ready to go, including handwriting technology, Bluetooth/WiFi, and Rendezvous zero-configuration networking.

    Imagine the flat-panel iMac without the connecting tube. Everybody says "the screen makes you want to touch it and adjust it" wouldn't it be cool if you could pick it up and carry it into the next office?

    Personally, I've been wishing for a nice wireless tablet PC for home use for a while. So I can read slashdot while plopped on the couch, of course. :-)

    1. Re:apple dropped the ball? by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've played with Apple's Inkwell handwriting recognition (derived from the Newton's Rosetta recognition software) and was both impressed and annoyed.

      First, I tried it on a Wacom tablet hooked up to a flat screen iMac at an Apple Store. Horrible. Don't bother. My accuracy was quite poor. It was really quite a struggle to use. I know that Inkwell "learns" your handwriting but I think my poor accuracy was the disconnect between watching the screen rather than my hand as I wrote.

      A few weeks later I tried the Wacom manufactured Cintaq LCD pressure sensitive display when I was at the OS X O'Reilly conference. It was fantasticly better in terms of handwriting recognition. The difference was amazing. One other very cool thing about the Cintaq display was that it could be put at different angles. Though the demonstrator had it in a vertical screen like orientation, most people seemed to find it more natural to have it in a much flatter orientation ... say 10 degrees from horizontal. (kind of like the angle of those old school chairs with built in desk arms). I even tried the Doonesbury test "Egg Freckles?" test which it passed with flying colors.

      It wasn't perfect though. What was odd though was switching between the different modes. I'm not sure if this was simply the way the demonstrator had the display set up, but there were definitely three different modes. One was as a mouse replacement (clicking, dragging, etc). One was with the handwriting recognition (I've already described). And one was as a pressure sensitive drawing mode (very cool in Photoshop and Painter). I'm not sure what caused it to switch modes (a button on the pen? something in the interface?) but it certainly wasn't obvious. All of the modes operated wonderfully well individually, but it was the thing that needed the most work.

      After the Newton fiasco, I think Apple marketing deliberately doesn't want to appear to be "first" with handwriting technology. My suspicion is that they are refining the hardware and software (by taking feedback from those using it in the wild) but that they want Microsoft to take the first attempt at marketing the technology far and wide to the public and perhaps even fall on their face with a sloppy first implementation.

      If Microsoft makes handwriting recognition a technology the general public wants, that's great. Apple will already have it on their checklist as well. But if Microsoft makes huge promises and fails to deliver a good implementation, Apple's marketing can come along saying "This is what they were trying to do. We got it right."

      My bet is that the next big release of Mac OS X (ten dot free) aka Panther will have lots of bug fixes and enhancements to make consumers long for new Apple hardware. Things like autoconf-enabled 802.11g base stations, Firewire 2 ports, faster graphics cards, and possibly writable LCD displays.

      I think Apple wants to be cautious about overpromising its abilities (Lest it gets the same rep as version 1.0 of the Newton did).

  99. what journal graphic format? by Saltheart · · Score: 1

    "What we did is we came up with a form that is better than JPEG. It's about 50% better."

    Hrm...I don't guess there is any use hoping they used an open format?

  100. hard core pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, how did the "author" know what the @leased 150 "hard core" linux fans, looked like? were they all wearing penguin golf shirts? when they o00oo0o0ed & aaaahhhed, did they have a look of total permaneNT defeat?

    fauxking phony FraUDs. sheesh!@#$%

    1. Re:hard core pirates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      concur, at the last buybilly preseNTation i attended, the ?pr? touts lameNTdead that were not even 150 linux fans all together, in the wwworld. scary how nice they "look", whilst telling such lies.

  101. Colleges by swankypimp · · Score: 2
    Imagine trying to follow a lecture on, say, particle physics given by a soft-spoken (or monotonous) professor. Now imagine trying to concentrate on the lecturer over the clickety-clack of hundreds of keyboards taking notes. When I was in school, some teachers banned laptop use in their classes because of this.

    And besides, I can't type for shit.

    --

    --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
  102. They killed it, now they (try to) resurrect it by blamanj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the late 80's a concept called "Pen Computing" was the Next Big Thing. Companies like Grid were building the hardware, and companies like Go were designing software that would be appropriate to the platform.

    Along comes MS with vaporware called "Pen Windows" and the whole industry collapses because everyone wants to see what the 800 lb. gorilla is going to do. Naturally, attempting to kludge up an entirely new UI on top of Windows fails miserably, but not before everyone else runs out of money and the idea dies.

    Of course, there were other issues, CPU performance, LCD cost, etc. but the technology was relegated to the Newton (and the subsequent PDA industry) where it has languished for 15 years.

  103. How natural is the input? by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

    I don't know about most people here, but I really don't get on with character or word entry using any kind of stylus - there's something unnatural about having to keep your hand off of the screen and only make contact with the stylus.

    I see this table is not pressure sensing, does this mean you will be able to rest your hand on the screen while you write?

  104. Before it's too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    the entire lecture hall CHEERED a Microsoft product). I believe that Microsoft's own online hype literature is insufficient in describing just how powerful their Tablet concept is.

    Someone revoke this guy's slashdot account NOW.

  105. m$/..net unveiled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coming soon to a web?server? near you.

    same. that's two BiG adds this a.m. for the felonious kingdumb, & 0 for J. Public. no surprise if VAlairy's lnux.con goes up a penny or two. That's how IT works?

    give 'em anything they whaaaNT, so long as IT's FUDge.

  106. People aren't patents by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Depends on MS's purpose in hiring them. It may be that as long as MS can keep the best talent from working for somebody else, it doesn't matter whether they actually produce anything at all.

    What?

    If a corporation spends a sufficient ammount of money for someone, they're certainly going to put them to work. If they don't produce anything, they probably get fired--and if they produce something that can make MS $, they probably get some sort of bonus.

    "Buy to sit on" makes sense for patents, copyrights, and trademarks--but not for people.

    1. Re:People aren't patents by bergeron76 · · Score: 2

      Yes, but I'm certain that Billy gives them absolutely no creative control over anything, and balances it with hideous salaries. As a result, they stick around and work on "MS approved" projects.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    2. Re:People aren't patents by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Yes, but I'm certain that Billy gives them absolutely no creative control over anything, and balances it with hideous salaries. As a result, they stick around and work on "MS approved" projects.

      "Creative Control?"

      MS is a software shop, not a comic book store. Their whole business model rests on having everything work together--"creativity", as wonderful as it is, tends to butt heads with other examples of creativity.

      I suspect (I won't claim to be "certain" and, unless you're an insider, I don't think you should either) that MS has a set company policy where anyone, from BillG to a mail clerk, can submit a new idea. If the idea's good enough, it'll be made into a new product, or folded into an existing product.

      Besides which, getting an idea--or just "being creative"--is easy. Following through on an idea to its completion--any idea--is a harder task, which is more than enough challenge for the brightest minds in the industry.

      If you doubt me, well, look at how long the HURD is taking. Great idea, but getting it to work has, apparantly, been a PITA.

      MS's problems are predatory business practices and marketing-controlled engineering. The engineers and coders themselves are, by all accounts I've ever heard, very skilled and competent--they're just given a rather torrid working environment.

    3. Re:People aren't patents by jejones · · Score: 2

      Didn't MS hire away some people from Borland?

    4. Re:People aren't patents by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I have no idea...

      but I don't doubt that they did. I just doubt that MS hired people away from the competition, and then didn't put them to work.

    5. Re:People aren't patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I work as a programmer at Microsoft, in a Product group (i.e. one that's supposed to make money, as opposed to Research). If you're not submitting ideas on some level, you're going to get asked to leave. The more significant your ideas, and of course the more ultimately successful, the more you get promoted. So yeah, creativity is a big deal. If your boss is having to tell you what and how to do everything, (s)he's not going to like you very much.

      MS Research, which I don't have any first-hand experience with, is allegedly even more this way, because profit is taken out of the equation. (When a Research technology is ready to be productized, the business onus is moved into a Product group.)

      Sometimes there are company-wide "initiatives", but they're mostly meant to align everyone's priorities in an attempt to generate some synergy. (The Microsoft entropy is towards turf wars, as you point out.) Management doesn't get involved with product design or technical decisions in much detail, just high-level reviews to make sure the direction is right. And of course Management loves being treated to a slick demo as much as they like giving them.

      I don't know what you mean by a rather torrid working environment. According to dictionary.com it's either "violently hot", "a fervent desire to change society", or "the sultry sands of the dessert [sic]"...?

    6. Re:People aren't patents by bmajik · · Score: 3, Informative

      i would love to give you a long and detailed explanation of where this "argument" falls down, but its easier to just cut to the chase:

      you're stupid.

      If you want to understand what MS research is, why dont you visit the web sites ? I'll give you a hint. At a research university, there are a bunch of faculty. They cut their time between doing research and teaching. Big name professors are big names because of their research interests, publications, and sometimes industry connections. Not because they're swell teachers.

      MS research is similar. Except nobody wastes any time teaching.

      It is typically NOT the case that research in MSR is vagely related to something that can be productized. It is PURE computer science research, in a wide variety of areas. Sometimes, some of this research has huge upside for something MS wants to do with a product. Sometimes that takes years. You should browse through the different projects and talks on the MSR site, and ask yourself how much of that you see in MS products today.

      As far as "creative freedom", well, i happen to know a few people at MSR that are doing their work on linux, because they feel like it.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    7. Re:People aren't patents by bergeron76 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Stupid is relative. You would've had a lot more credibility if you'd have refrained from "name-calling" in your argument. I find the following clause from your webpage "stupid":

      Numbers and Planets: Those born on the 30th of the month are ruled by the number 3, and by the planet Jupiter. Those ruled by the number 3 generally try to rise to the highest positions in their particular sphere. Because Jupiter also rules Sagittarius, expansive, optimistic and magnanimous influences are maximized for November 30 people but, indeed, excessive tendencies are as well. Those ruled by the number 3 love independence, so November 30 people may do best free-lancing or in business for themselves.

      But as I said, stupid is relative. I agree that I may not know MSFT internals as well as you appear to. As such, I'd consider myself "uninformed" on the topic. But, stupid? No. Your website, is stupid [sarcasm], but I digress.

      I do give you credit for your argument, and that's what matters. Just mark me as your Foe, and we'll move on.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    8. Re:People aren't patents by bmajik · · Score: 2

      it is stupid of you to present your uninformed conjecture about what goes on at MSR as fact. You don't have any idea what people at MSR do, so why did you post a message at all ? There are so many other ways for a slashdotter to express that they dislike microsoft and anything about microsoft, what made you choose this particular subject ? Just curious.

      its funny that you dug through my website and found that. its an excerpt from a book i bought called "The secret meaning of birthdays" or some such. I bought it because i picked a few random people that i knew, and the pages about their birthdays generally seemed to describe them pretty well. To this day i haven't decided if theres "something to it", or if the wording is sufficiently general to let anyone read into it whatever they like. (i.e. "oh, i could see that about her, this book is right on the money!")

      I dont have friends or foes. (But apparently some people have marked me as their friend/foe). I don't dislike you, i dont _acutally_ think you're stupid, and you're right, it was lame of me to counteract your hipshot with one of my own.

      How about this -- next time you have a question about MSR, i'll point you at the information you want. There are plenty of factual reasons to dislike microsoft, so lets keep this a clean fight :)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  107. Re:No keyboard?- read the links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has a keyboard, it's a laptop where
    the screen swivels around and closes
    on top of the keyboard, screen side up,
    so you can write on it.

  108. 150 hardcore linux users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was in a room with probably 150 hardcore linux users

    how did you stand the smell? good god, man...

  109. 3.5h Max Battery Life = 2h in Reality = Lame by Viscount9 · · Score: 1

    Do you expect me to use a tablet that needs to recharge in 2 hours (com'on this 3.5 hours is basically the CPU doing a screensaver)

    For the kind of thing M$ is marketing thing for, I would like to see a 5 hour batter life. So, if I am using it for round-checks, as a doctor, or just writting in it, I have to recharge this sucked every 2-3 hours?

    I would rather have a plain, old, paper-based notebook which last hours, if not months, on no batteries.

    If Acer, or whoever else, can achive that, now we are getting somewhere.

  110. Apple by nfotxn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm, there's Inkwell for OS 10.2 and the iBook and TiBook are over-due for an upgrade.

    Will Apple do it too? Most importantly, will they do it better?

    --

    _nfotxn

  111. D O E S IT R U N L I N U X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it doesn't it's no good, like the rest
    of the low quality, overpriced, pay-forever, products ariving from Microsoft....

  112. Makes You Wonder.... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1



    Considering how much _less_ goes into a tablet versus a laptop, it makes you wonder why the concept has taken so long to catch on as it has... I love mine, for example. Got a nice little Ricoh G1200-S tablet for $100 on ebay. Runs 98, Linux, fun to hack with...makes a great wardriving dash-mount console.. lots fun stuff.

    The only problem with tablets is, you walk around with a constant fear of scratching the display. There needs to be some sort of form-factor for tablet casings...some sort of disposable laminant to encase your tablet in.

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  113. hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was in a room with probably 150 hardcore linux users, and it seemed to me that the demonstration just floored them (the entire lecture hall CHEERED a Microsoft product).

    well they don't sound very hardcore to me. Unless the person holding the tablet pc was natalie portman or something...

  114. mandatory by nuckin+futs · · Score: 0

    imagine a beowulf cluster of those... oh wait, that would be a clusterfuck. :)

  115. Why all the hype ? by El+Prebso · · Score: 1

    Seriously isn't a tablet pc just a very flat pc with some fancy software ?

    If anything Im impressed by the hardware makes, getting all that stuff into that small a box.

    I don't care about any of Microsofts products anyway, they are way to expensive, an forget about modifying features you don't like. What's fun about cool software if it only works with with Windows (Which is not cool software).

    Oh btw. Could you just picture a cluster of tablets ?

    --
    I didn't say it was your fault. I said I was going to blame it on you.
  116. It's a concept worth developing by mtec · · Score: 1


    After 5 years, I still use a Newton (current is 2100). Like reading /. it's a very bad but self-redeeming habit. God knows I've tried to stop. Anyone know of a support group? I checked out Newton Anonymous but that was just an anti-grav group...

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
    1. Re:It's a concept worth developing by blamanj · · Score: 2

      Oh, I agree it's worth the research, and I, too, still actively use a Newton (MP2K).

      I was just noting the power of MS on a fledgling industry and its ability to both kill it or hype it back into life. Sad that we lost 15 years of development, though.

  117. Yeah, yeah, yeah... by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm sure it's wonderful and all, but what happens when you're away at a conference with the thing and it crashes on you? Prolly, the same thing that happens when you're at a conference with a Pocket PC: HARD RESET and you lose all your data.

    Look, I know operating systems are a complex thing, especially those with GUIs. But, shit, with as many people as Microsoft employs you'd think they'd have all the bases covered and BSODs would be a thing of the past.

  118. sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what you're saying is that if you compile the communist manifesto you get out a sendmail binary?

  119. Corel Grafigo by frank249 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was surprised that Corel's Grafigo Tablet grahics /colaboration application was not mentioned. It has already been previewed last Sept at Seybold and got good reviews here. Corel started development early with Microsoft and designed it from scratch for the Tablet PC. From all accounts it is one of the best apps.

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  120. This is Bob Dole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just popped a little blue pill. Bend over and I'll show you flimsy.

  121. Re:damn, looks hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, I was thinking the same thing.

  122. Really On The Right Track by robertmc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I am not a fan of Microsoft, but this time they are really on the right track. I work in the imaging field and got a chance to play with a Tablet PC over a two day period in July. I attended a conference with Microsoft's Bert Keely (who is in charge of the project) who guided me through its features.

    Comments from people who have never or barely used the machines should be discounted. The work done at Microsoft Research in the area of merging bitmap and vector algorithms and compression/journaling (per the "behind the scenes account") is far beyond anything of which I am aware on any competing platform.

    That said, the resources necessary to accomplish the promoted tasks are large and will affect battery life. When the machines debut on November 7th and become integrated into the lives of the targeted audience, I believe it will become clear that, this time anyway, Microsoft is farther down the road than anyone else.

    About half of all Americans cannot type or efficiently use a keyboard. Not surprisingly, that's also about the penetration of PC use in the general population. This could be Microsoft's bid to achieve similar penetration of such appliances as the television and the telephone.

    1. Re:Really On The Right Track by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About half of all Americans cannot type or efficiently use a keyboard. Not surprisingly, that's also about the penetration of PC use in the general population.

      Your statement makes it sound like those people don't have a PC becuase they can't use a keyboard. I'd say they can't use a keyboard because they don't have a PC... hmm?
      I don't think its the need to use a keyboard thats holding those people back form using computing devices.

  123. Whoops - bad form... corrected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Bob Dole

    Bob Dole just popped a little blue pill. Bend over and Bob Dole'll show you flimsy.

  124. What I'd like to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...is: 1) have some sort of word recognition (dictionary) after the character recognition - this will probably cut down on a lot of unrecognized stuff. 2) Have the thing with a small drive but with a wireless connection to access the regular PC. This way it could be smaller (less spindles) and probably less power-consuming. I've even seen a Sony AirBoard which is basically a tablet screen that connects to an AirBoard PC, and sends video through it (think VCR/DVD), but this seemed to weired to me.

  125. The Open Source attitude by darylp · · Score: 1

    "Well, my handwriting recognition software works JUST FINE with my handwriting. Maybe you shouldn't write like a lamer! Don't tell ME what to do. Write it yourself!"

    Any OSS coder that demands a computer user write their own code is contributing precisely NOTHING to the community.

  126. Re:interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha! Dead to you! My interviewer hinted to me that microsoft _frequently_ hires people who they think might carry a lot of buying power in the future and are linux friendly now. I think he was calling me dumb but saying that microsoft's policy is to hire people like me. I don't want to move so I won't work for them even if they give me an offer.

  127. Highly pre-mature attempt.. by Ogerman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The technology required to truly replace pen and paper with something more effective is probably 10-20 years off. A 75-100 dpi LCD screen just doesn't cut it compared to a quality fine-tip pen on a piece of notebook paper. Neither does the lag of screen output and character recognition. And what more, these Tablet PC's are way too large and heavy.. and they use short-lived batteries.. and they're really, really expensive!

    When I brainstorm, sketch, diagram, etc. I use paper and pen. When I write, program, or do anything else structured, I use a keyboard. I have precisely zero need or desire for one of these "Tablet PC's."

    Now, a real piece of innovation would be "electronic paper" nearly as flat and flexible as the real thing. Think 400dpi with a reversible draw/erase stylus. But it should be dumb--nothing more than a reflective monochrome bitmap device. You draw to turn pixels on and erase to turn them off. And it's only interface would be to transfer these page bitmaps to and from my desktop or laptop. (where I can do character recognition if I really need it) This electronic paper would also be excellent for reading books, newspapers, docs, man pages, etc.

    1. Re:Highly pre-mature attempt.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're working on what you want. Think 'Paperbeta' and 'Rollavision'. To be kept informed when we launch in a few years, send a 'keep me informed' message to 'machinesthatwork@owonder.com'

    2. Re:Highly pre-mature attempt.. by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of these two products, and googling both terms results in zero results. Can you elaborate further?

    3. Re:Highly pre-mature attempt.. by Babylon+Rocker · · Score: 1
      John Dvorak has a good column on Tablet PCs ( What's Wrong With This Picture? ). His conclusion:
      Success of the Tablet PC depends on it hanging on until it gets to $499. It's that simple.
  128. Nothing new? by Otis_INF · · Score: 2

    Some here moan about "This is nothing new!", "[insert company here] did this in [insert random year here]"!!

    If that's so true, why can't I go to a store and buy a product with the specs of the TabletPC or better?

    The TabletPC is the first incarnation of a kind of product some people will find useful. Let them. The moment you all start to cry out loud that it's nothing new, it will suck or similar crap, think about this: "as soon as a competitor comes up with a more useful product running Linux, you have all right to cry fool. Until then, shut up, learn and listen."

    The vectorization of the handwriting, f.e. the copy/paste functionality of your handwritten text into an email, it's cool stuff. As software-developers, you have to admit: it's software that has a serie of interesting specs.

    Why oh why is it then so damn hard to admit MS made something cool? Because it doesn't run Linux? So? "Use the tool that fits the job.(tm)".

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  129. Yes, imagine where the Newton would be today... by mtec · · Score: 1

    ...if dev had continued *sigh*

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  130. Ah, memories of the Newton. by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    Remember the Newton? You'd try writing "Having a party" on one of those things and it would produce "Hating a potty" or some such. There was a Simpsons joke about that kind of thing. In fact, the only word I could get Newton to consistently recognize was, in fact, "Newton". So writing "Newton sucks" would produce 1001 fun incorrect interpretations: "Newton stocks", "Newton sports", "Newton critics" and so on.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    1. Re:Ah, memories of the Newton. by zephc · · Score: 2

      Crap man, did you have like the first newton iteration? Because I have a 130, and while its a little laggy for HWR, its VERY good about recognizing my handwriting, which can go from bad to worse at any time. A friend has a 2000 or 2100 (can't remember which) and he's working on a port of a Palm emulator for it, and that thing is both accurate AND fast for HWR

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    2. Re:Ah, memories of the Newton. by __aaaaxm1522 · · Score: 2

      Agreed. I purchased the OMP (Original MessagePad) and was appalled at it's handwriting recognition - it was just as bad as the Simpsons and Doonesbury cartoons made it out to be.

      But despite it's shortcomings, the platform was promising. So when the MP130 came out (I skipped the 110 and 120), I picked one up. What a difference! The thing nailed my handwriting within the first couple days. Here was a completely usable PDA, with excellent PIM functionality. The Intelligent Assistant was tres cool - you'd simply write "Lunch with joe on Friday" and it would open up an appointment slip for 12 noon the following Friday, and present you with a list of "Joes" from your addressbook. Two taps and the appointment was scheduled.

      I picked up a 2100 shortly thereafter, and life couldn't be better - 206 Mhz StrongARM processor, tons o'RAM, two PCMCIA slots... ethernet support, and wicked-fast and accurate HWR. My only complaint? It was a little too big. But I just picked another one up to replace my Sony Clie - PalmOS and PocketPC still haven't matched it's functionality.

  131. Sounds like hype to me by FridayBob · · Score: 0, Redundant

    150 hard-core Linux users cheering for a Microsoft product? Why do I have trouble believing this? And even if it is a cool product, what do you think will run on it? Windows of course. And I seriously doubt whether they will ever publish the details for this thing's hardware API. Therefore, I don't see that this product can ever be better than any of M$' other products. I just don't trust their motives.

    If it's cool enough, I'll just wait until some other manufacturer produces one that runs Linux. :-)

  132. X supports touch screens too .. by konmaskisin · · Score: 2

    big wup...

  133. uhmmm by KaosConMan · · Score: 1

    *"You will be able to select it and parse the words and know what words are."
    *"There will never be a time where if you cannot recognize your own writing on the page that the recognizer will be that intelligent."
    +So if I write something down you'll be able to tell me what I wrote.
    +But, if I write something and I don't know what I wrote, you won't be able to tell me what I wrote.
    =So, basically, you can tell me what I already know!!

  134. been there with DOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    breathtaking eyecandy spawning cheers and loose bladders in the audience/testbed...

    Hey sport, it's called a "Dan Bricklin demo." It doesn't really work, but it's how things would happen if the machine respected my feelings.

    How in hell will WinXPro run OCR/OnTheFly(TM) on a lousy 800 MHz Pentium?

    That tm is my term for handwriting recognition.

  135. How long before libXsvg modules ... by konmaskisin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and XRnR... make X capable of "recognizing" vectors scratched at any angle on *any screen* the server can communicate with.

    SVG is the killer secret computing technology. 10 years in the making in W3C labs, perfected by Gnome, built in to Mozilla and waiting to be bundled into X and ....

    BLOW EVERYTHING OUT OF THE WATER!

    1. Re:How long before libXsvg modules ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wher can I find out more about SVG?

    2. Re:How long before libXsvg modules ... by The+Trix+Rabbit · · Score: 0

      ahahhahaahahahahhaahahahahahah

      Oh, you really believe that, don't you? I'm sorry.

  136. Re:sig (WAY offtopic) by MarkusQ · · Score: 2

    # gcc communist_manifesto.txt
    # diff a.out /usr/sbin/sendmail
    #

    So what you're saying is that if you compile the communist manifesto you get out a sendmail binary?

    No, I think he's (either) suggesting that you compare the result of compiling the file communist_manifesto.txt with the sendmail binary (but not in any way predicting the results) or (under the more likely assumption that the file does not contain a syntactically valid program) pointing out to us 1) that gcc deletes any preexisting a.out if it is given an invalid source file and 2) you can confirm this by trying to diff it with something, since diff will complain that the file doesn't exist.

    He's correct, but I can't help but think that there are easier ways of accomplishing the same thing.

    -- MarkusQ

    P.S. Ah! I see! It's a clever way of removing a.out if and only if the file communist_manifesto.txt exists and does not contain a syntactically valid program. I'm not sure why you would want to do this, but it is a rather clever hack if you need it.

  137. 30 y.o. idea being realized today. by KaosConMan · · Score: 1

    "I really want to make sure that the Tablet PC will be easy to use. You never have to think about how to sit on a chair. We should have a computer device that people never have to think about how to use, they just pick it up and use it in a very natural way." - Wang

    "...once you would compute with a handheld 'Dynabook'... millions of potential users meant that the user interface would have to become a learning environment; and needs for large scope, reduction in complexity, and end-user literacy would require that data and control structures be done away with..." - Alan Kay

    I am a huge fan of Alan Kay! And, the more you learn about computing today, the more amazed you will be at how right he was 30 some years ago. Wang, and a lot of the computer industry with hum, is finally realizing what Kay knew back then.

  138. so the Linux tablet pc that I've had for years by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    Is somehow less than a winshit xp one?

    I hate to bring uptimes into this, but my tablet pc has more uptime than my servers thanks to a recent blackout. Without "sleeping" I doubt that one of these things could manage better uptime than a month. What good would one be if it crashes in the middle of a Quake 3 match?

    If only Apple would release a tablet computer. My iBook is perfectly compatible with Linux (modem aside) and hasn't crashed in any of its three operating systems (OS 9, OS X, and Debian Woody). Power management is entirely software-controlled and easily disabled in Linux if I want to use my $1100 laptop as a fancy iPod.

    But don't take my /. post for it, I have a "Switch" article at http://flame.dnsart.com/

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  139. The scary thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The scary thing, if these things take off, is the amount of new cruft that will be created in the form of messy annotations. What a nightmare... imagine all your data now, on all your different devices, but all festooned with post-it notes. And every year or so you need to pay for the latest version of Microsoft annotator in order to read the totally unpredictable musings of your boss and coworkers, which could be loads of crap or could be important career-changing to-do items and feedback -- you don't know which, so you have to read them all, which means you have to upgrade. And imagine the web, annotated with little notes, or analtations, we could call them, from every company shill, pundit, and AOLer with an opinion. Not a new idea, but widespread tablet PC use could make it pervasive. Aaaaaaaaaagh!

  140. Anyone remember GRiD Convertibles & AST's PenE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    running Windows for Pen computing? I do - I had an AST one. And it was only OK. And that hinge sure looked fragile. Laptop one moment, tablet the next. Pretty cool desgin, even for the mid-nineties.

  141. electromagnetic stylus!=good by quick_dry_3 · · Score: 2

    Other than it being rather like a magna-doodle, as a user, why would i want an electromagnetic stylus versus a normal touch screen? (other than a reason to do more cleaning because you can't use the device until you find that stylus)

    The touch screen means you can use anything, stylus, stick, finger, pen, etc to type, write or press buttons on the systems screen.

    A special electromagnetic stylus means you need to use the stylus, what good is that? If I'm just browsing the web, or queuing some music to play in my futuristic wireless home, its much easier to just pick it up and press thse on-screen buttons with a finger than screw about with a stylus.

    When i use my iPAQ I only use the stylus to type, reading email, web, ebooks, and most othr uses I just use a fingertip - for handwriting a fingernail gives enough pressure and precision.

    Given a normal touch screen I'd love to have a few of these, but I'll pass on those glorified magn-doodles.

    1. Re:electromagnetic stylus!=good by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I thought it would be obvious that by not using an ordinary touch screen, it means you can safely rest you hand on the pad without the pointer going crazy.

      Maybe someone can make a hybrid version.

    2. Re:electromagnetic stylus!=good by Hiawatha · · Score: 1

      Exactly right, Soup. I've been using one of the prototypes. At first it's a little annoying that you have to use the "official" pen on the tablet screen, but you soon realize that it's a great idea. Nothing that touches the screen will affect your data, except a compatible stylus. These guys really thought the thing through.

      --

      Hiawatha Bray

      Tech Reporter

      Boston Globe

  142. Also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you have too many PCI cards on your bus, or a really cheap one in there (Like the Linksys LNE100TX I threw away).. no more bluescreens.

  143. Buggy whips by t_parker16 · · Score: 1

    jeez, dood. what's the rush? if microsoft can do something tomorrow, what's wrong with the linux/free software crowd finishing their version of it the day after tomorrow?

    the war will not be won tomorrow. once you understand that, everything becomes crystal clear.

    e.g. in 5 years, what kind of value proposition will micro$oft be able to offer that will entice you to pay them a $200 premium on a $100 computer, or similar system?

    1. Re:Buggy whips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if microsoft can do something tomorrow, what's wrong with the linux/free software crowd finishing their version of it the day after tomorrow?

      What, like GNUStep?

  144. Hypocracy by The+Trix+Rabbit · · Score: 0

    A few days ago there was an article on a digital pen that let you take notes digitally on special paper. The majority opinion was that it would be useful and something they would consider buying.

    Now Microsoft offers something which allows you to take digital notes and it's touted as being useless, not as good as a keyboard, nothing new, bla bla bla.

  145. In Reality this is just an MS Ad. by HomerG · · Score: 1

    This is just another MS Ad place by one of the fake Linux supporters. I sometimes wonder if I'm Slahdot or ZDnet, I almost can't tell the difference anymore.

    Slashdot is the voice of the open source community like ZDnet is the mother of Linux.

  146. They are neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used one and think they are impressive. Being able to write without waiting for OCR and being able to search one's notes is great. This might put other OSes in a pickle for a while.

  147. TabletPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Collaboration is one of the next big technological waves. We've toyed with collaboration for years with things like Lotus Notes, handheld's, cellphones, etc, but the TabletPC will offer true collaboration.

    The models I see working most effectively are sales staffs and then the teacher/student/parent model.

    And another thing all of the anti-MS people haven't thought of....add wireless technology to these things and any 5 people within range become a network.

    This adds to your ability to chat, share files, and game together.

    You guys need to think beyond writing your name 100 times and playing tic-tac-toe.

    Jarb

  148. no more content free press releases! by fermion · · Score: 1
    First, one wonders why this article did not link to real, albeit limited, information on the Tablet PC.

    Even from this page we learn amazingly little about this device. We see that the tablet runs Windows XP with certain enhancements. However, the page also tells us that [b]ecause of the special hardware features of a Tablet PC, the operating system cannot be purchased separately for installation on any PC. Why can't we buy the OS. Is it that MS sees the wisdom of Apple's business model of selling sexy mostly closed boxes. Is MS upset that some evil people no longer pay a tribute on every processor, and is introducing this new model to make sure that major vendors can no longer sell naked PCs. More importantly, will we be able to purchase a major upgrade for XP on the tablet PC or will we need buy a new Tablet PC.

    As far as I can tell, this is just a large screen portable with some handwriting recognition hacked on top of XP. They say it will run all XP programs, but they also say that it requires as special development kit. One wonders if applications will in fact run on the device, or will we need to wait a year for developers to write application that will take advantage of this "powerful platform."

    In any case, a content free post for a content free press release.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  149. Re:Break It Down Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool! A tears for Fears fan! I haven't seen on ein years. They really were a great band. It's too bad that Curt and Roland had that big falling out. I read about two years ago that they were tentatively planning to record together again. Funny how their individual careers didn't do so well after the band split. Just for the record... I have nearly every Tears for Fears single ever released from The Hurting through Elemental. I kind of stopped paying attention after Raoul and the Kings of Spain. So how many others here on /. are Tears for Fears fans?

  150. obvious, my friend by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

    you might have noticed some MS.NET adverts at the top of your /. articles lately. Those ads weren't mistakenly placed there...
    Taco's not "falling" for anything. This is just another advertisement. Obviously. ANybody who's seen the Amazing Tablet PC can tell you the same. Hype. Good character recognition, but not much better than the average iPAQ with Calligrapher - except that it'll recognize when you write at a funny angle too. WOW. It's an oversized PDA that runs like my old PII-266 cranking along under Win2K Advanced Server.

    1. Re:obvious, my friend by zapfie · · Score: 1

      Point to the MS.NET advertisement. See how the domain name is doubleclick.net? In case you didn't know, they are an advertising company that offers banner ads in exchange for money. Slashdot runs a mix of Doubleclick and OSDN ads. They don't get to pick what Doubleclick ads they get, just what topics they should cover. Microsoft buys commercial coverage from Doubleclick, not Slashdot. So it's pretty inevitable you will see their ads, as you would on any computer site using Doubleclick's banner ads. Nice troll though.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
  151. Type Vs. Handwriting by BryanL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder about the future of these things. When I was in high school only girls took typing (to prepare them to be secretaries.) My typing is horrendous. I wish I had taken typing.

    Today, keyboarding is taught in jr. high to every student. Twelve year olds type better than me.

    I would love a tablet pc with good handwriting recognition, but in ten years will that be the same? I wonder if the tablet pc came about because some exec is from a past generation and lacks good typing skills. If so, what will happen when the next generation comes along and can type well (or type better with just their thumbs) and has less of a need for a tablet.

  152. They cheered only becuase... by Bruha · · Score: 1

    They only cheered so MS would feel comfortable about releasing it and they could get their hands on it and promptly install Linux on it.

  153. Exactly! by SectoidRandom · · Score: 2

    You always here such hype about "more natural imput", but that is a joke, keyboard's are so much more efficient than either handwriting or voice! Convinience factor is slightly different, and sure this helps there, it isnt so easy to type (or hand-write for that matter) while walking down the hallway..

    But I recently read a study on the effectivness of voice imput, the fact is that speach and writing use completly different parts of the brain, so much so that writing (typing / etc) uses so much less brain power that it free's you completly to think! So not only is voice imput slower it is vastly more inefficient as it limits your thinking!

  154. Re:Wondering what's a Grammar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read and Learn
    http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=grammar

  155. Microsoft HARDWARE by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...is, in my experience, almost always fantastic. I for one could not live without a 5-button Intellimouse Explorer and a Natural Pro keyboard, and I have MS gamepads and joysticks for gaming.

    Say what you want about Microsoft's software, marketing, and management... but their hardware products are amazingly good.

    1. Re:Microsoft HARDWARE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is an input device really hardware? Isn't it more like an accessory? I know it's not software, but is it really hardware?

    2. Re:Microsoft HARDWARE by bbc22405 · · Score: 1

      What astounds me about the original article and blurb, is that it seems to give Microsoft credit for the hardware. It's all "Yay, Microsoft Windows XP Table PC Edition", but most of the links are to Acer, regarding the _hardware_. So be impressed with Microsoft hardware all you want, but this article, according to the title, isn't about Microsoft _software_, spurious links etc notwithstanding.

    3. Re:Microsoft HARDWARE by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Yeah, many people have described Microsoft as a great mice company with a software division.

  156. Astroturfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go away astroturfer

  157. Yeah, right . by bluefusion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK . Microsoft gets points for putting handwriting recognition into a small device? No, we had the Newton and many other handwriting recognition devices before this. So is the fact that the 0S has suddenly integrated the handwriting recognition a big deal? They sure make it SOUND good, but do we really care? Now the clincher. I am writing this entirely on a tablet . But not a Tablet PC. No, I'm using my Wacom via Mac OS X Jaguar;s "Ink" technology. It's not perfect, but its pretty damn close. Handwriting recognition really isn't that big of a deal. [resumes normal typing] OK, my allowed edits were to correct extra spaces and to fix ONE letter per word maximum. And you know what? Once I turned the "spacing" sensitivity down, it stopped putting in extra spaces, PLUS I only had to change six letters in the entire portion above. It works. The problem is, it's SO much faster to type. So before you start making a big deal over the fact that Windows has handwriting recognition, realize that not only does the Mac OS have it already, (as usual) but that Apple doesn't even bother making a big deal of it, even though their handwriting recognition is GOOD, because guess what? It's NOT A BIG DEAL. Does anyone really think that I can write faster than my 96 wpm average? I think not. But you CAN do this already if you want to. The fact that Microsoft bundles their proprietary OS with a bunch of extra recognition stuff isn't a revolutionary concept. The fact that it works--and relatively well, too--isn't even a revolutionary concept. Jaguar's Ink tech, brought from the Newton era, still does its job. The fact that Microsoft can match it seven years later is really not worth making a fuss over. So I ask again-- what advantage, besides the obvious larger screen, does this have over my carrying around a Visor Prism with a keyboard? And don't tell me that the keyboard is hard to set up-- it takes three seconds max. Why would anyone want a Tablet PC? Really?

  158. where to find by spammyy · · Score: 1

    FranklinCovey will be carrying these around christmas(just in time eh?) or so i've been told. they are also the first developers, excepting M$, to program specifically for this platform. price should be around $2k, and a docking unit will be available for keyboard and mouse input.

    --
    If good things come to those who wait...why work now? Procrastinate!
  159. PenMac was way before this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple had an answer to this almost ten years ago, the PenMac. Nice tablet form factor. Great battery life. Fast, fast ink response. Damn good.

    The project was killed before birth to make room for the Newton. And, of course, the Newton was later killed to make room for Steve Jobs ego.

  160. The original tablet inventor a decade ago was Go by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

    I wish to point out that Microsoft did not invent the tablet PC. Ten years ago I was priviledged to work with the people at Go Corporation, who created the PenPoint operating system for tablet PCs. I had hands-on exposure to a working 386-based tablet PC and was excited about them coming to market. Go was well along with a solid operating system. Then Microsoft stepped in, conned details of Go's technology, and announced their Windows for Pens. Microsoft succeeded in killing off Go, and then immediately buried Windows for Pens. We could have had tablets 10 years ago except for Microsoft. Nonetheless, tablets are awesome and will drive another wave of innovation. I remember editing text by touching a paragraph and sliding it with my finger to where it should go. And the drawing tools in one application I saw were hot. There was 'What you DO is what you GET' drawing, no mouse piloting or standalone stylus position errors.

  161. Re:sig (WAY offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, he is saything Eric Allman is a flaming red communist. Stupid trools. Can't code so they criticize.

  162. Doomed to fail? by skaag · · Score: 1

    Nobody is going to use this. Calligrapher is not as good as you guys think. It takes people a long time to understand how to write with these things.

    I still own a Newton 2000, and it has everything the article on Microsoft Research mentions. It actually looks suspiciously like they have taken the Newton 2000, and copied its features over into Win32 world.

    Today, I use an iPaq PDA, even though I have the Newton 2000, and even tough I think the NewtonOS beats WindowsCE by far. Why? iPaq is simply smaller. I can stick it in my pocket, and it won't look too weird!

    I can't imagine anyone using the tablet PC's as they are intended to be used. It's just too big to be a PDA, too small to be a desktop computer, it's like a new category. Let's not forget the form factor which will add to the cost.

    I also personally think that no amount of marketing and brainwashing will actually make this product a worldwide hit. Some ideas look great on the surface but never withstand the test of time.

    What we REALLY need is handwriting recognition on Linux, and a combination of Windows Manager + Set of Applications that give users the NewtonOS experience! Combined with a fast processor, very high resolution color screens (look at the recent Sony Palm devices for an example), and a tiny form factor, this is the winning product of tommorow, and guess what, all based on open source!

    Just my two cents :-)

    Skaag

    --

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...

  163. Re:The original tablet inventor a decade ago was G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Jerry Kaplan's book "Startup: A Silicon Valley Adventure", and it's an amazing account of how Microsoft screwed Go Corp. "Oh, the NDA was with our Operating Systems Group. Pen Windows is from our Applications Group!"

    Tried to get the local library to buy a copy, but they declined.

    I understand he was co-chairman of Egghead.com, but now that Amazon owns them, I don't know what he's doing.

  164. +1 Obscure StarTrek reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI, Majel Barrett was the voice of the ship's computer on StarTrek TNG and afterwards. I can't think of anyone better to have as the 'voice' of my computer, either :)

  165. goto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    geeez I though I was the last one still using Fortran (ano good c programmer would use a goto statement).

  166. It's Caroline Woodham!!! (Yeah, she's in college) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry Carol I know you're just a model/photographer, we shouldn't have fun at your expense. The truth is that there's an office party at Microsoft for getting positive publicity on Slashdot.

    I'm amazed that an advertising piece with no real details could be sent by a Microsoft Rep and posted (PS to the rep: Kudos).

    Hi I'm a college student. You wouldn't believe it but a room full of Linux guys were cheering on clippy Office XP where he takes a new, more prominent role. There's no news on why this is cool, but it's astounding (and I'm really not even part of MS PR dep). I'm dropping MacOS X today. Hello XP. You've got to see this!

  167. I wonder if... by grumling · · Score: 1
    They remembered to include left handed people this time. My I-Paq is great, but every time I scroll down with the stylus, I have to cover up the text I'm trying to read.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  168. late by cosyne · · Score: 2

    I saw one of these a few months ago, along with a prototype of their phone os. It was cool shit. I was impressed. I nearly faltered in my flaming passionate anti-MS hatred (the one with the big rusty acid dripping spikes sticking out of it). It was like the time i set my Win2k laptop down next to an IRDA-enabled LaserJet, and i could just print to it. Both times, I was impressed with what MS had done. But on both those occasions, the same thing occured to me which brought me back to my normal state: if it weren't for microsoft, i could probably have done this years ago. I'm pretty sure one of my dad's friends had a tablet on his desktop back in the early 80s. I was like 6 at the time so it's a but fuzzy, but tablet technology has been under development for most of my lifetime. And IR data? My parent's replaced the old B&W tv with no VHF knob around the time of the 1984 olympics, and the new tv came with and IR remote. Granted, your standard TV remote doesn't do hundreds of Kbits/sec, but the ideas and the basic technology were there. We needn't have waited for microsoft to decide they were good and ready to support _______. If they didn't take such rigorous steps to destroy competition in the computer sector, I think we'd be years ahead of where we are now. Microsoft didn't start the computer revolution, they just bullied their way into an illegal monopoly over it. Sure, WinXP TabletPC edition is cool. But for all the money we've given them, we should expect more than this.

    Ok, done now. (And for the record, vague references to "we" are basically intedned to include the whole world, because the advancement of computer technology affects or will affect most of Earth's population in the near future. The idea of naming it the "Information Age" is that IT is at least as important to human history as stone, bronze, industry, and nuclear technology. )

  169. Pig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You assume the poster is male.

    1. Re:Pig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right! I'm the original poster and I AM female. I'm bisexual too. So with that attitude he doesn't realize how much fun he could have had if he played his cards right. I'm pretty choosy though. Likey that he's not my type. I like my men intelligent...

  170. Bi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The person said they like Linux and Windows, they're obviously Bi.

  171. Economy boost? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    While I think it is mostly a PHB toy, it might spark the tech industry a bit, ending this really annoying slump.

  172. One Idea Worth Reading: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simple idea here after reading everything else i've seen:

    integrate it with Laser Keyboard that is about to hit the market. now THAT would have flexibility to admire.

    agree?

  173. Believe the hype by Hiawatha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got an Acer prototype Tablet PC and I'm here to tell you it's way cool. Those Linux guys should be applauding. Those who say Microsoft never innovates will have to give it up for them this time. The Tablet PC is a major step forward in laptop technology. I'm not quite prepared to give up the keyboard. But if you use the model that's basically a convertible laptop/tablet device, you get the best of both worlds. If I were Apple, I'd be trying to copy this--quick. It's exactly the sort of thing Apple should have done first.

    --

    Hiawatha Bray

    Tech Reporter

    Boston Globe

  174. Moron Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please tell us what firsthand experience you have with ANY of the issues that you mention in your comment.

  175. Even Then... by krmt · · Score: 2

    will people buy it?

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  176. MS also built on Aha! Inkwriter by GlenRaphael · · Score: 2
    don't get it. The Newton was a piece of crud that failed because the technology was crap. Doonesbury and Scott Adams were not being unfair in their cartoons,

    Gary Trudeau had never used a Newton before doing the comic which he intended to make fun of PDAs in general rather than specifically the Newton. Trudeau was so favorably impressed with the Newton MP120 once he got a chance to use one that he drew this panel to be used as an easter egg in the Newton 2.0 ROMs.

    The 2.0 Newton had awesome technology, but it was ahead of its time - nobody really knew what a PDA was for at the time. The MessagePad 2000 was great but cost over $1000 and was the size and weight of a small brick.

    Most engineering is incremental development rather than a paradigm shift.

    This is true. Microsoft has done some excellent work incrementally improving the Aha! InkWriter technology they bought a decade ago and moving some of its features into the OS. And I hope they keep at it, because there's a lot of improvement still to be made.

    Here's a brief review of Bill's talk at Comdex 2000 the last time he made a big deal of Tablet PCs.

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!
  177. What about Inkwell? by issaco · · Score: 1

    Inkwell recognizes your handwriting. Just write on a graphics tablet, and Jaguar turns it into typed text at the cursor in any application. Inkwell just works with all your existing applications. No upgrades, no application changes are necessary.

    Inkwell lets you write wherever you want to on the screen, and the recognized text just flows to the current insertion point, as if you'd typed it on a keyboard. So when you're working with a graphics tablet, there's no need to put down the pen and return to the keyboard just to enter a title, caption or filename. You can also write command-key shortcuts with the pen -- it's easy to open and close windows, and otherwise control your applications, without lifting your pen from the tablet.

    Built on Apple's Recognition Engine --Inkwell's handwriting recognition is the best in the industry. Beyond just words and numbers, you can also use Inkwell to write commands. Inkwell provides a set of easy to learn and remember gestures that are convenient for carrying out common functions, such as cut, copy, paste and select-all, with a single stroke of the pen.

    While in handwriting mode, you can still drag windows and use scrollbars and other controls immediately. The pen knows to behave like a mouse instantly in these special places. For other places, you can just press and hold the pen still briefly to use it like a mouse, anywhere.

    You use Ink on a floating window to automatically insert text at the cursor. This window can mimic standard modifier keys, so you can write command-key shortcuts, bring up contextual menus, and so on, without having to return to the keyboard. You can shrink the window to a single button, which saves screen real estate while letting you toggle the pen between the pure mousing behavior used for drawing and painting and its handwriting behavior.

    Conversely, you can expand the floating window to InkPad, a handy utility application. The InkPad app offers additional features for writing and editing, such as alternate word lists and targeted gestures. InkPad also lets you draw quick sketches and paste them in most other applications. So you can draw a quick map to the party, or communicate that new design you've got in mind, and send it out with your email, effortlessly.
    Preferences allow you to add uncommon words to your own personal word list, for maximum recognition accuracy. And if your writing style is a little bit different--maybe you write your words closer together or letters farther apart than the average--you can fine-tune the recognition to suit your style.

    This works in *any* macosx application -even terminal.

  178. The purpose of the visit was recruitment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They cheered for the fact that ...

    An earlier post said the purpose of Microsoft's visit to the University was recruitment.

    So it's obvious why the crowd cheered. Do you think they would have raised their chances of finding work at Microsoft if they'd booed? They might as well have been bought...

  179. The Tablet PC book's video is hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just got a copy of Building Tablet PC Applications, an MS Press book. The "behind the scenes" video on the CD is easily worth the price of the book -- I almost died laughing on the floor!

    There's a small version of the video from microsoft.com: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?Rel easeID=44355&area=search&ordinal=1

    Man, if all Microsoft is this wacky, we're in for some good action :)

  180. This isn't being done by Microsoft by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 2

    Probably the really useful aspects of a tablet PC are being enabled by other companies. The people over at Parascript are making really huge strides in handwriting recognition.

    The problem with all of these is that they're dictionary based. We got one of the ViewSonic tablets in here and I fired up IE and tried to do "http://slashdot.org" through the handwriting recognition. Needless to say it was a horrible failure.

    Also, try inputing any passwords into the system? You either have to tap away at the soft keyboard or you're completely SOL.

    Finally, how do you press 'Ctrl+Alt+Del' on a PC that has no keyboard? In the case of the ViewSonic tablet you couldn't even log in because the handwriting and keyboard support were in the OS and didn't start until the desktop was there.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:This isn't being done by Microsoft by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Finally, how do you press 'Ctrl+Alt+Del' on a PC that has no keyboard? In the case of the ViewSonic tablet you couldn't even log in because the handwriting and keyboard support were in the OS and didn't start until the desktop was there.

      I remember seeing a classmate's laptop running Windows XP. The login screen said "Press CTRL-ALT-DEL or insert card to log in," suggesting that you can use a smart card to log in without pressing CTRL-ALT-DEL. Of course, there's also the case that Windows XP for Tablet PC will, when released, allow the user to authenticate by signing the pad or making some kind of unique symbol instead of a keysequence.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  181. Go get a CrossPad from eBay by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    I bought a CrossPad back when they first came out. They struck me as the best interim solution until you got true portability and high resolution capture capabilities.

    The thing used an RF-based pen and a table behind a pad of paper. You could store up to 50 pages of handwriting in the thing before having to upload it to a PC. (You could page forward and back if you wanted to add additional notes.) The only problem was that it didn't have an erase feature on it.

    On the PC side you had IBM's Ink Manager software that handled capture, storing, and even recognition of the handwriting. To top it all off the tablet part will run for weeks on a couple of AA's.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  182. Re:sig (WAY offtopic) by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

    I hate to say it, but the AC is right :-/

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  183. a Microsoft product? by Bas_Wijnen · · Score: 1

    I just met some Mircosoft people who were talking about this thing. They said the hardware was just made by the usual people (HP, Acer, ...) and only the software is MS. I'm sure linux and the gnu tools can be easily ported to the thing, since it seems to be IBM compatible. I wouldn't call this a "Microsoft product", as I don't call any `normal' PC a "Microsoft product".

  184. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    "One basic notion underlying Usenet is that it is a cooperative."

    Having been on USENET for going on ten years, I disagree with this.
    The basic notion underlying USENET is the flame.
    -- Chuq Von Rospach

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...