Slashdot Mirror


Yamaha To Withdraw From CD-R/RW Business

An anonymous reader writes "What's going on. When I first heard this I thought it was a bad joke. They make great burners! 'Tokyo, February 5, 2003 - Yamaha Corp. decided at a board meeting to cease sales of CD-R/RWs for personal computers and to withdraw completely from the business by the end of March 2003.'" Does any other company make burners that can burn an image on the CD?

335 comments

  1. I never liked Yamaha by pfguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Back when I used to work at BestBuy I got a great deal on a 24x burner, but I had so many problems with it that I returned it for a 12x TDK VeloCD. I guess I don't really care if Yamaha stops making them, as I wouldn't buy one.

    1. Re:I never liked Yamaha by psychogentoo · · Score: 1

      Maybe you got the "deal" cuz it was defective. :)

    2. Re:I never liked Yamaha by pfguy · · Score: 1

      It was in the box, sealed, and it worked. It just wouldn't burn onto any of the CDs I had (Memorex).

      The employee discount on that burner was just insane.

    3. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had issues with the first high speed burners. Other annoyances were lack of CD-TEXT, CDG etc, for those who want to fire up the karaoke machine.

      I dont know what all the Yamaha fanboy flap is about. They make (made) second rate burners at premium prices. If I were to pay a premium for a burner, it'd be a plextor.

      Of course the TDK VeloCD are great burners at a great price, and even have translucent blue CD trays for would-be Mac owners and other faggots.

    4. Re:I never liked Yamaha by NoahsMyBro · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've ranted about Yamaha on many web forums previously, so I'll be brief here.

      In a nutshell, I bought a Yamaha SCSI CD-RW drive about 3 or 4 years ago for about $300. Within 2 months it died. For over a year Yamaha Tech Support (including Phone, Fax, & Email) absolutely, stubbornly insisted the problems were software-related, in spite of the fact that I had tried the drive with multiple software packages, on 3 different PCs running 3 different OSes.

      Then, one day I worked up the energy to call them yet again for help. This time, with a record of my previous contacts right in front of him, a rep told me that "the burner certainly did seem to be broken, sorry, and oh yeah, it was out of warranty so he couldn't do anything for me. But in a few weeks there was going to be an unadvertised promotion whereby I could trade in my old unit for a discount on a brand-new one, so I should call back in a few weeks." He adamantly refused to let me speak to a supervisor, repeatedly claiming he was the top guy and there was nobody above him I could speak to.

      Since then I've refused to knowingly buy anything from Yamaha (including a Ford SHO with a Yamaha-engine), and I've told anybody that will listen about this.

      I only hope this is the start of a steady downfall for the crooks.

      (Sorry, I tried to be brief, but got carried away...)

    5. Re:I never liked Yamaha by shepd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >It was in the box, sealed, and it worked. It just wouldn't burn onto any of the CDs I had (Memorex).

      Yeah, Memorex, eh?

      Memorex == OEM Ritek == Junk.

      I've not yet met a burner that handles their media well. Maybe a laser cutter would do...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    6. Re:I never liked Yamaha by pfguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the 12x TDK I replaced it with (and I haven't replaced in 3 years) burned every last one of those CDs with no coasters.

      I didn't get 1 good burn from the Yamaha.

    7. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm. If they're going to pull that kind of bullshit, they've lost my business too. I've recently been looking at a burner to buy (for linux only operation), and Yamaha is off the list now.

    8. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Chupa · · Score: 5, Informative

      My first CD burner was a SCSI 4/4/16 Yamaha drive...failed in less than a year. I sent it back for warranty service after dealing with an extremely rude customer service rep. When I got it back, the drive tray would not open all the way and would instead jam. I opened it up and fixed the problem (bent support) and the drive worked after that. At least it did for another 6 months, whereupon it quit working again (basically would not burn CD-Rs that anything, including that drive, could read, regardless of the media quality).

      So I decided it was time for a new drive. Being the retard I am, I spent $250 on another Yamaha SCSI CDRW drive, this time a 16/10/32 model. It's been about two years, and I once again regret my decision...although it is not as bad as the first drive, this one will not burn CDRs readable in other drives unless I do it with the absolute best media available and at a max speed of 8x.

      About 8 months ago I got a Dell inspiron notebook that came with a TEAC 16/10/32 CDRW drive. This thing works perfectly, not a single problem. Now I do all my burning on it, leaving my expensive Yamaha crap aloneb.

      So basically I also could care less that Yamaha has quit making CDRW drives. Good riddance.

    9. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 1

      I own a 16x12x40 lightspeed and the only problem i had was once when i formatted i forgot to enable DMA on my HD and burner and kept getting buffer underruns. That was a dumb one. The burner was expensive, but i didnt know better at the time. All in all it was a worthwhile investment for me. Am i in the minority? seems theres alot of horror stories here!

    10. Re:I never liked Yamaha by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Bought a Plextor, myself. In some damn big hurry, too, and still haven't got around to burning a thing, two months later. I almost bought a Yamaha, but reviews of Plextor were most convincing. Reviews of Sony, however, suggested an experience similar to yours.

      On an offtopic tangent...

      In a nutshell, I bought a Yamaha SCSI CD-RW drive about 3 or 4 years ago for about $300. Within 2 months it died. For over a year Yamaha Tech Support (including Phone, Fax, & Email) absolutely, stubbornly insisted the problems were software-related, in spite of the fact that I had tried the drive with multiple software packages, on 3 different PCs running 3 different OSes.

      This recount somehow put me in mind of taking a tech support call 16 or so years ago. A user in a college lab insisted a diskette drive on an Apple][ worked just fine a few hours earlier. They indicated turning the computer on would turn on a light on the drive and it made sounds like it usually did, so something must be wrong with the computer. I wasn't normally Apple support, but I took it as nobody else was available. Someone had dictated each computer and peripheral be secured against theft, thoughout the building. There sat the diskette drive, with a 1/4" bolt, about 8" long, right through the top of the drive and table, secured by some locked nut apparatus beneath. Amazingly, the guy who drilled a hole through the drive missed all the delicate parts, so a diskette fit about 50% of the way in, but no further. The user, nor guy who put in the bolt, could figure out why it wouldn't go in further.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    11. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe I got a yamaha cd burner. I bought it for around 350 canadian. I got it at future shop and got their special 3 year warranty. Anywayz, I ended up trading it in 3 times. Not bad for me though cuz each time I got a faster burner :) I started out with a 4x burner, now Im up to a 24x burner :) Only time it cost me was when I wanted the 24x burner, but then again, I got it for the trade in price, divided in half, which ended up being around 60 which was a deal back then. Though I dont think I'll buy another one from em. I'll probably buy another brand.

    12. Re:I never liked Yamaha by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      My LG CD-RW burner has never had a single problem with my media, and all my CD-Rs and CD-RWs are Memorex.

    13. Re:I never liked Yamaha by PalmKiller · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, yea. Thats obviously because the yamaha was burning the memorex cds at their supposedly 24x rate, whereas the tdk was burning at 12x. So the media was over-rated on its speed. Too bad you had no idea what you were doing and sent it back, sad really.

      Yamaha, Plextor, Richo are about the top of the line and they are on constant flux as to which has the best unit out. TDK is just a cheap oem drive, though they are pretty solid.

    14. Re:I never liked Yamaha by frodmann · · Score: 1
      That seems like a terrible story on Yamaha support.

      I can't comment on their support but I have been extremely happy with their product. I bought a Yamaha SCSI 4x CDR at the end of '97. Its gone through heaps of CDs, but 5 years later its still as reliable as ever. This little burner has outlived many cd drives and even survived a couple of upgrades.

      Its not anywhere near as fast, nor does it features like underrun protection. But I wouldn't risk trading it for a newer maybe less reliable drive. (maybe when dvd burners get a bit cheaper)

    15. Re:I never liked Yamaha by ez76 · · Score: 1
      back when everyone else was making buffer undderun coasters, yamaha was first to market with 2MB buffers (today, 8MB buffers).

      that alone made for a damn fine CD-R burner.

    16. Re:I never liked Yamaha by shepd · · Score: 1

      Hey, same thing for me too (LG 40x burner). But then again, I've never burned a Ritek OEM CD at more than 24x (I buy the $15 100 piece spindles). There's no point, since even if they could handle it (which they probably can't) it's only a minute or so faster.

      But if you pair up poor media with an average drive at full speed you're asking for trouble...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    17. Re:I never liked Yamaha by mallfouf · · Score: 1

      I did the same exact thing as you. I bout the same yamaha scsi drive, and i can't burner any faster than 8X.
      I just bought a 48X TDK drive, and i love it. The best move i could have made in the CDR-W field.

    18. Re:I never liked Yamaha by daaan · · Score: 1

      I have a buddy that raves about his 6416S by yamaha, so much that when it was time for me to get a new drive last may, I picked up a CRW3200 (24X IDE), and had zero complaints about it until it started to refuse to fixate the media...so I took it back to the store that I bought it at, traded in my extended warranty (we all know just how flaky optical drives are, I was smart this time...) and got myself a CRW-F1, which...wouldn't fixate the media...turned out that it was a software configuration issue on my part. I've been using the F1 for about two months now, under four different OS's and can do nothing but rave about this drive.

      On a side note, I get really frustrated with people who only buy based on price. I paid a premium for my drive, I could have gotten a lite-on 40X at the same time for considerably cheaper, but something inside of me warned me off of it. Another buddy called me a fool, bought the lite-on and happily installed it. he was burning CD's about 30 seconds faster than i was (big deal) but, would burn a coaster about every third time that he would burn a CD..not only that, but the drive just bags on his system (2.0 P4 with a gig of PC2100, IDE RAID etc etc...) to the point of not even being able to open a text file while burning. Meahwhile, my yammy burns at full speed, and let's my multitask effective on my somewhat slower box (Dual PIII866 with 512 PC 133 and a single Quantum 40GB drive). Who got the better deal? I would honestly still have no worries about buying another yammy. I'll miss the drives...

    19. Re:I never liked Yamaha by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1
      Then, one day I worked up the energy to call them yet again for help. This time, with a record of my previous contacts right in front of him, a rep told me that "the burner certainly did seem to be broken, sorry, and oh yeah, it was out of warranty so he couldn't do anything for me.
      Did you try pointing out to him that your service history indicated that the drive was defective before the warranty expired? The documentation to prove it was right in front of him. 99% of the time, that's enough justification to count it as a warranty issue.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    20. Re:I never liked Yamaha by dakers27 · · Score: 1

      Had the same problem with yamaha burners, but instead of gettign fucked over by yamaha it was compaq. I ordered a refurbished shitpaq something or other for my sister because she needed a cheap computer. When i got it the burner didnt work, so i called them and sent it back, it took them almost a year to get the thing back to me and then when i did get it, the replacement didnt work either. when I called them back about getting it replaced again, they informed me that it was out of warranty and suggested that i buy a new burner. this post is definitely redundant, along with the 30 other ones that deal with yamaha burners being shitty, but that fact speaks volumes about the quality of their products. plus it feels good to diss compaq and yamaha since the fucked me :P

    21. Re:I never liked Yamaha by slaker · · Score: 1

      TDK drives, at least in the 12x - 24x range, were usually Plextors, so don't poke too much fun.

      In general, I've loved the Yamaha drives I've had, starting with an old single-speed mastering system I got in '97 and on to the couple of 8x SCSI units I bought about three years ago.

      Plextor I've been less impressed with. None of the 12x plextor drives I support at work, work as burners, although all will read discs. I've been replacing those drives slowly with Lite-On units, which I have found to be sturdy, quiet and reliable... just a little fussy about media.

      I still have my SCSI Yamahas, but after being unable to find a "fast" CD-RW with a SCSI interface, I invested in a few Acard SCSI to IDE HBAs, and moved most of my burning to quasi-SCSI LiteOn drives. By the time Yamaha got around to bringing out a "fast" SCSI CD-RW, it was six months too late and $50 more than I paid for my IDE drive and HBA put together.

      Realistically, CD-RW is at the limit of its development, anyway. 52x or 56x is as far as anyone has gone with CD-ROM drives, and even those are almost out of the marketplace (88% of the computers I built last year had a burner, the other 12 had just a DVD-ROM). We've got an absolute commodity product, much like a floppy drive or a keyboard. There's no margin in that stuff, and no good way of differentiating yourself. I think Yamaha made the right choice, even if I'm going to miss being able to order their products.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    22. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Wow, I must be lucky then. When I started burning a few years ago with an HP external, I tried a few brands and Memorex discs always worked out. I've switched burners a couple of times since then, and I've still been using Memorex. I don't remember the last time I got a 'coaster'.

      First was an HP-7500e (I think that was the number)
      Then an HP-9500i
      Then an 'LG Combo drive CD-R/W DVD-ROM' sold without a box, that also works flawlessly with these discs.

      I haven't bothered to shop around for CD-R media at all, I haven't had the need to.

    23. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Matt_R · · Score: 1

      My 12x scsi plextor has worked flawlessly for 2+ years I've had it.

    24. Re:I never liked Yamaha by TVmelissa · · Score: 1

      You can add me to the list of people who had bad experiences with Yamaha CD-RW drives. A couple of years ago, I bought a Yamaha 6416S (6x4x16 SCSI). I've had various intermittent problems since I got it. The drive spontaneously resets a couple times an hour in Windows ME and 2k (but doesn't in 98SE, XP or Linux), there were 2 separate times I couldn't burn anything from Windows (98SE the first time and XP the second, with the drive working fine in between, on both OSs), but it worked fine from Linux, and now about 75% of the time I put a CD-RW disc in, it doesn't even recognize that there's a disc in it.

      I just got an LG GCE-8480B (48x16x48), and so far it burns just fine, though I've only burnt 2 CD-RWs (both on 4x media) and 1 CD-R (a 32x disc) in it.

    25. Re:I never liked Yamaha by shepd · · Score: 1

      7500e is a 2x drive, and, IIRC, wasn't particularly fast for the time it was produced. At 2x you can burn just about any quality of media.
      9500i is a 12x drive. You're pretty lucky that the cheapie discs worked with a drive at the time you bought that... Have you tested them lately? ;-)
      The new cheap discs are good even up to 40x, so today it doesn't matter, unless you care about how long you're going to store your data (or compatibility with older drives).

      But, at the time a 24x burner was hot stuff and 12x was still being sold commonly, cheap discs were a really poor bet. Or so was my experience with a cheap 100 pack from Future Shop that would only burn at 4x.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    26. Re:I never liked Yamaha by pdp11e · · Score: 1

      Back in my old country (Eastern Europe) the software piracy was a way of living. Regular way to buy a software even for the government institutions was to go to your local (pirate) dealer. Those joints were public retail shops with a bunch of PC's in the backroom burning popular titles 24/7. Interestingly enough they were "legal" in a sense that they were registered businesses, paying taxes.
      Anyway, I had an opportunity to talk with several owners of these outfits and the general consensus among them was one word: "Plextor".
      Yamaha, according to them, was to be avoided like a plague. Typical lifetime of Yamaha burners was less than one day in that environment!

    27. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Reziac · · Score: 1

      See above (several posts) for my experiences with Yamaha CDRWs and premature deaths. You are now #12 on my list of known examples of same. As yet I have no contrary examples. The few cases where someone has piped up and said "but mine still works" -- well, every one has had some of the early symptoms I've ID'd.. so will soon be dead.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    28. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Reziac · · Score: 1

      And you're now #s 13, 14, and 15 on my list of known premature deaths. See various posts, above. It was a basic design problem (overheating warped the laser out of alignment).

      BTW, if you go back and check the CDs that Yamaha wrote, likely you'll find some of them have since gone bad.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    29. Re:I never liked Yamaha by coffee177 · · Score: 1

      I have to admit that I also bought a Yamaha cdr/w. Humm. Let me pull it out of my junk bin a sec.... Model: crw2100s december 2000 The first one died and I bought a second one and it also died just after the year mark. Seems the scsi controller would recognize it but it couldnt access it at all. Ok, Now I have a buslink externel usb 2.0 burner and it does a great job. I really enjoy it. Fast and quiet. coffee177

    30. Re:I never liked Yamaha by inquisitor · · Score: 1

      Your friend doesn't happen to have a Dell, does he?

      Recent Dell BIOSes (on all the Dell P4s I've seen) do not autodetect IDE hardware. This means that while Windows will detect it, it will only run in PIO mode; you have to force the BIOS to autodetect the CD drive to enable DMA. (And then you have to remember to enable it in Windows...)

      And don't bother just setting it all to auto, as that's broken: an empty IDE slot will cause the BIOS to hang for twenty seconds or so. Just another fine example of how apart from the easy-open case (ripped off the PowerMac towers anyway), modern Dells suck.

    31. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >it was out of warranty

      They needed to count the warranty period from your FIRST complaint, not your last.

      >he was the top guy and there was nobody above
      >him I could speak to.

      The Attorney General's office would disagree.

    32. Re:I never liked Yamaha by pfguy · · Score: 1

      I didn't buy it because of the price, it was the most expensive burner on the shelves (aside from the SCSI drives) but since I could get a good deal on it I decided to shell out the big bucks for a good burner, around $200 for the Yamaha. It wasn't until I went to a cheaper drive that I got any reliability.

    33. Re:I never liked Yamaha by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Based on a sample size of ONE you come to the conclusion that Yamaha burners suck?

      Well, as a rebuttal, I have owned a SCSI Yamaha 8424 for years, have burnt probably well over 500 CDR's and have NEVER EVER made a coaster with it, therefore, Yamaha burners are the best in the World. Even if my drive won't do RAW.

      Got sarcasm? (BTW, the figures I give for my Yammy are true.)

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  2. it's all about dvd's baby... by goofballs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    cd-r/w's are running into the $40 range these days- yamaha doesn't want to / can't compete at those prices, so they'll stick with higher margin dvd burners. makes good business sense.

    1. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Informative

      CD burners have pretty much reached the end of the road for development, and there's not much money to be made at these prices. My Liteon 52x costs about $55, and you can't spin a CD much faster than 52x without it disintegrating (that's 52x on the outer tracks which is about 24x on the inner tracks at the same rpm). Kenwood has made faster CDROM drives using multiple lasers to read, but noone's tried it with CD-Rs yet.

    2. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe i'm being silly here, but what the heck difference does it matter whether its on the inside tracks or outside as far as speed goes? Is it not about RPMS rather than angular velocity? Outer tracks contain more info than inner tracks? This seems kind of strange.

    3. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by Bill+Currie · · Score: 1

      RPMs == angular velocity. 2 * pi radians/second == 60 RPM. Are you perhaps thinking peripheral velocity?

      --

      Bill - aka taniwha
      --
      Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

    4. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by cide1 · · Score: 1

      I think he is referring to the velocity of the disk under the laser. On the outside, a cd-rom laser has a lot more disk go by it in the same amount of time, while on the inside the same amount of time results in less data being read. Angular velocity is equivalent to RPMs, the specification under discussion is the linear velocity of the disk under the laser.

      --
      -- the computer doesn't want any beer, no matter how much you think it does. NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer.
    5. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by Ramze · · Score: 1

      Outer tracks have more surface area to hold data. The tracks are concentric circles, and the first track is the outer track (b/c it reads faster) Since the circle is larger, it has more surface area to hold more data than the inner circles. When spinning the disk, the outer tracks cover more data per revolution than inner tracks, so the speed is faster for reading outer tracks.

    6. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by GreatOgre · · Score: 3, Informative

      Somebody more familiar with the issue can correct me if I'm wrong, but here goes my explanation.

      Most CD drives today are rated according to their linear velocity. I think, not sure, that most CD drives spin at a constant angular velocity (RPM, rad/s); therefore, when you are near the center of the disc, the linear velocity is slower (lin_vel = radius * ang_vel, or something similar to this at least). Similarly, near the outer edges, the linear velocity is substantially larger.

      In the good old days, most CD drives were rated according to their angular velocity. The CD always spun fastest when reading near the center of the disc and slowed down when reading the outer edges. You can only spin a disc so fast before it tears apart. (Some guys did an experiment to see how fast you can spin a CD before tearing apart; however, I forget the URL.) If I remember correctly, I think these drive maintain a more uniform transfer speed off the CD as well.

      Or at least I believe that's correct.

    7. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      These disks spin at constant angular velocity. That means the oustide spins faster than the inside.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by micromoog · · Score: 1

      Almost right . . . except the first track is actually the inner track.

    9. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by be-fan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your explanation is dead on, your nomenclature is reversed. Current CD drives are CAV (Constant Angular Velocity) while before they were CLV (Constant Linear Velocity).

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    10. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by JBird · · Score: 1

      I think you will find that the CD track starts in the centre of the the disk and moves outward. Also, there are no concentric "tracks", as the recording is done as a single track starting (as I said before) at the centre and moving outwards.

      Just take a look at a partially filled CD-R and you will see that the recorded data is towards the centre.

    11. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by singularity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Point 1: CD speed (both reading and writing) is measured in data/time. In this case it is measured in chunks of 150kb/s. That is to say that a 2x CD-ROM drive could read 300kilobytes per second.

      Point 2: You make reference to this - angular velocity and linear velocity are going to be different based on where you are on the CD.

      The outer tracks obviously hold more data - the track length is longer ("track length" probably not the technical term, but I am using it to mean how far it is around at a certain spot on the CD). Using our familiar Circumference = (2 * r * pi) formula, we can see that as the radius increases (the distance away from the center of the CD), the length of the track length increases, as well.

      CDs store data as digital data stored in non-reflective pits on an otherwise reflective surface. These pits are a certain distance apart. This distance does not change as you get father out, and the size of the pits is a constant, as well.

      Think about cars parked in a spiral pattern. The farther you get out from the middle, the more cars are in each loop.

      So what does this mean for our CD-RW? Toward the middle of the CD, the CD is spinning at a certain constant rate. However, only so many pits are going by each second. For a 52x CD-RW, there are about (24) x (150kb) each second. As the laser moves out (since CDs burn from inside to the outside), the CD RPM stays the same, but now there are more pits flying by each second. Towards the outside, there are (52) x (150kb) each second.

      So the angular velocity (RPMs) does not change that much while burning. The linear velocity, however (how many pits are going by) changes greatly, more than twice as much.

      This is actually somewhat of an over-simplification, since modern CD-RWs use a mix of both CAV and CLV technologies.

      Two (or three) interesting side notes: DVDs work using several more technologies, but the end result is the same. For one thing, the pits used in DVDs are much smaller, as are the tracks. This allows a lot more information to be stored on a single DVD. In addition, DVDs are capable of using multiple layers using different laser wavelengths. So when the DVD player changes layers, the laser changes wavelengths, allowing it to "ignore" the pits on the first layer and instead read the pits on the second layer.

      In addition, DVD drives are measured using a different unit than CDs. At 150kb/s, a DVD would be an extremely fast CD drive reading off a DVD. A single layer DVD read at 1x is about 1.321 MB/s. More information about the speeds between CDs and DVDs can be found on the DVD FAQ

      An interesting historical note: Laserdiscs could be found in both CLV and CAV formats. CAV (Constant Angular Velocity) discs came first, and had one frame per revolution (or maybe more, but there was a ratio between frames and revolutions). CLV (Constanst Linear Velocity) discs came later, and used a technology closer to CDs - allowing multiple frames per revolution, with the rate being based more on location on the disk. This allows for more information per disc (thus Laserdisc being called "CAV Standard" and "CLV Extended Play"

      And hopefully this has been "more than you ever wanted to know about angular and linear velocity of optical discs."

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    12. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by gte910h · · Score: 1

      The outside does not spin faster. It spins at the exact same speed as the inside. The outside moves faster, therefore it is the limiting factor on the amount of information that can move past the laser.

      --
      Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
    13. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      If you think about it, it is not really strange.

      Density of data is the same everywhere on the disk (unlike other disks such as HDD/Floppy). Therefore, the inner track being shorter than the outer track, it does contain less data!

    14. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It does matter. I don't know if you familiar with laser disks, but sometimes on shorter movies they would print the back side in constant angular velocity instead of the normal constant linear velocity that we are used to seeing.

      Anyway, if you looked at side one it looked normal. With basically random 1's and 0's you are looking at a bunch of noise, especially when all of the bits are the same physical size. On the back sides of some of these disks you could see a spoke pattern to it. "Lines" would radiate out from the center. This is because it was mastered in CAV (a less expensive process but nets less data.) It is actually pretty cool, try to find some old laser disks and start looking at side B.

    15. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by Nexx · · Score: 1

      You can only spin a disc so fast before it tears apart.

      Just found the /. article, but the link was removed. According to the /. article, it was around 28,000-30,000 RPMs. That's still pretty darned fast :)

    16. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by Deflatamouse! · · Score: 1

      Redundant by this time.. but cdrom tracks spiral outward while hard drive tracks are concentric.

    17. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by kasperd · · Score: 1

      you can't spin a CD much faster than 52x without it disintegrating

      The last article I read about the subject said that a scratched CD could break at an even smaller speed. And splinters comming out the front of the drive at 48x speed can be dangerous.

      Kenwood has made faster CDROM drives using multiple lasers to read

      That certainly sounds like a nice idea. To achieve anything they must of course read different positions. For sequential reads that would require reading into a buffer fir a few rounds and then moving the head outwards. The seeking is not free, so doubling the number of lasers does not double the sequential read speed. Multiple lasers could however have other nice usages. Imagine the improvement they could give you on random access to a CDROM. Or simultaneous audio playback and reading of CDROM on a media with tracks of both types, you just dedicate one laser for CDDA when doing this. Or imagine riping all the tracks on a CDDA with different lasers. Multilaser recording is however something I don't exepct to see anytime soon. But maybe you could read the already recorded part with one laser while another was still burning.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    18. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhh man, I had a Kenwood 72X, it was fast, then it exploded. Oh, many games wouldn't work on it either, not sure why, boy that was a super shitty drive.

    19. Re:it's all about dvd's baby... by Ramze · · Score: 1

      do'h! I was thinking of Hard Drives... my bad :-)

  3. Wrong side of the disk by theedge318 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well i can understand them dropping out of the market .. can you imagine the development costs for burning on the wrong side of the CD?

    --
    Sig Nazi- "No Sig for you, come back 1 year."
    1. Re:Wrong side of the disk by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      who said anything about burning on the wrong side of the CD?

  4. They're Winning!! by skinnydskitzo · · Score: 1, Troll

    The RIAA/MPAA are finally getting what they want. Companies are bailing on cd burners. What's next, OS's designed without the 'copy' command for the sake of preventing piracy?

  5. Doesn't hurt me by Apreche · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, they made good burners. But any tech geek worth his salt knows Plextor is besto. I have an old plextor 8/4/32a. It burns a cdr in about 10 minutes. It can get by any sort of copy protection with the appropriate software. And I've never had buffer underrun. Ever. The newer Plextors are even faster and even more high quality. No burner is better. So, even though Yamaha burners don't suck, cause they don't, they aren't the best. And I probably would never have bought one. So, who cares.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And I probably would never have bought one. So, who cares."

      Maybe one of the other few billion people on the planet eh?

    2. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 minutes.... haha...hahaha....HAHAHAHA

    3. Re:Doesn't hurt me by sweetooth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. I've had a couple of Plextors, and a couple of Yamahas. The Plextors have been better overall. Also, after the last Yamaha I bought I'll never buy one again. It was one of thier 16x burnders that sounds like a jet engine every time a disc spins up in it.

    4. Re:Doesn't hurt me by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 1

      Actually according to the last review I read on tomshardware plextor's newest, fastest drives are not as good as they were once were (compared to similar products from other manufacturers). I think the Yamaha beat Plextor in price, performance and features.

      --
      0xfeedface
    5. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But anyone knows that Pextor's suck ass if you want to backup discs that have sub-channel data (copy protection) on them. To backup those discs, you need a LiteOn CD/RW to burn and a Pioneer DVDR to read the discs. Anyway, thats just what I've seen in forums.

    6. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course, tech geeks who really have a clue know that it doesn't matter anymore.

      Virtually all of the CD-RW's out there can burn any CD, regardless of copy protection, as long as you use the right software. None of them cause buffer underruns. And while they may not be better than a Plextor, they're not worse either.

      Of course, if you include cost then they are better - about 1/2-1/4 the price. For the same stuff.

    7. Re:Doesn't hurt me by pokka · · Score: 2, Informative

      "But any tech geek worth his salt knows Plextor is besto"

      This was true 3-4 years ago when CD-R drives were less common and more expensive, but times have changed.

      Lite-On makes some of the least expensive drives you can buy, yet they are top quality. They consistently beat Plextor and other expensive brands, not only in burning performance, but in ripping audio and reading data. Lite-On drives are one of the few brands that have a dead-on implementation of C2 Error detection, which is great for anyone who is serious about ripping their CDs to digital format. See Nero's Advanced DAE Error test results and you'll see Lite-on in 3 out of the 10 top spots. Not bad for a $48 48x CD-R drive.

      And this probably the exact reason that Yamaha is backing out. They can match the quality or the price, but they can't match both.

    8. Re:Doesn't hurt me by kasek · · Score: 1

      I sure am glad to see all the other people who have the jet engine burners in their computers...all along i had been thinking my drive was just f*cked up or something.

    9. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My LiteOn LTN-301 CD-ROM is the sorriest sack of shit I've ever seen. It's the second one of those shitbags that I've had in my computer. The first crapped out while still under warranty. Midwest Micro (the company I bought my computer from...they ruled) replaced it with no problems (they even mailed me a new one and told me to ship the broken one back in the box...any other company would've required the box be shipped in and they would've wiped the hard drive while they were at it :P ). The second one broke too. It's the only time I've ever wanted to make an inanimate object feel pain.

    10. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually TDK was the best

      TDK == plextor drive with a spiffy case and $50 off the price at best buy

    11. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your comment would be pertinent about 3 years ago.

      last couple of years plextor is no better then your average burners.

      there are others that are as fast/faster, and definitely others that burn through more protected disks.

    12. Re:Doesn't hurt me by rodvinge · · Score: 1

      If you're going to make those kinds of claims, please give a source of real data to back it up. Subjective data doesn't qualify.

    13. Re:Doesn't hurt me by rodvinge · · Score: 1
      Wrong. They ARE worse than Plextor. "Why?", you ask? Simple. EVERY CD burner makes little errors when burning (more so at high speeds.) Those errors are insignificant for your average geek; but if you're a producer/artist, it matters: you want your masters to be perfect. Plextor drives still have the lowest error margins.
      Sorry, parent was in response to this.
    14. Re:Doesn't hurt me by rodvinge · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a Lite-On/Pioneer sales rep. has been visiting your forums.

    15. Re:Doesn't hurt me by kerfax · · Score: 0

      I personally have had nothing but problems with plexator. I thing they suck and are over priced. i have an old USB IOMEGA burner and I have never had a prob w/it. It burns everything on any disc Ive bought. It's slow 4x4x12 but I have had no probe w/copy protection, etc. just use the right software, and It really like when I boot into Linux and use the KDE burning software. I use XP also ( for work related issues) and it works great w/roxio and NERO

      --
      The Wheel keeps turing, It wont slow down.
    16. Re:Doesn't hurt me by sweetooth · · Score: 1

      It's not just you. I paid an arm and a leg for the dang thing as well so I was really not happy about it. The first thing I did is exchange it for another Yamaha thinking it was faulty only to find out it was thier choice of motors that was flawed.

    17. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

      You don't need to back it up when its common knowledge. As speed increases, error rates increase. However, with newer drives, the errors occur less than they used to.

    18. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Temsi · · Score: 1

      You didn't follow the links in the article did you? Show me your wrist so I can slap it... :)

      The point about "burning images to cd" has nothing to do with copy protection. It has to do with the T@2 technology which burns text and images into the recordable surface of the cd, which are viewable with the naked eye.

      Who spends 10 minutes making CD's anymore?
      My 40x takes just around 2 minutes for a full 700mb cd.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    19. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "But any tech geek worth his salt knows Plextor is besto. I have an old plextor 8/4/32a. It burns a cdr in about 10 minutes. It can get by any sort of copy protection with the appropriate software. And I've never had buffer underrun. Ever. The newer Plextors are even faster and even more high quality. No burner is better."

      You've got that right. I've owned 2 plextors now (both IDE CD-R/w drives) and they were 100% solid with no problems ever. And I never found a copy protected CD which couldn't be properly ripped and then backed up with my drive.

      One other good thing is that if you life in Europe and buy a Plextor burner, you'll get a copy of Nero, which is IMO one of the best burning programs out there. Too bad they ship the Roxio EasyCD crap in North America.

    20. Re:Doesn't hurt me by antirename · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have a Plextor, and I love it. Hell, I spilled beer in it and still works :) Try that with a lesser drive. If you spill a beer down the front of your computer, just wiping the mess off the case doesn't quite work. Beer is sneaky, and will wick into the cracks around CD trays, making the effort pointless. You will have to take the drive out and clean it of all traces of beer, especially the beer that is gluing your tray in place. Of course, this information is purely subjective as I haven't actually tried this with a lesser drive. If you want objective information instead of personal pet peeves and experience, spill some beer in your drive. Then let me know how it worked out for you. The guy with the "don't feed your computer beer" sig may have other insights on this issue.

    21. Re:Doesn't hurt me by neurojab · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid you're wrong here. Before I switched to Plextor drives I had countless problems with drive compatibility of the CDs I burned. When I would burn a VCD, I would get countless data-loss artifacts... when I'd burn an audio CD, I'd get pops and crackes in the music. Plextor drives put your data on your CD exactly the way you master it. Maybe that's true of some other companies, but it's certainly NOT true of the majority.

    22. Re:Doesn't hurt me by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Damn straight man, If it ain't a Plex it ain't shit. I've been buying Plex drives and burners for years and my oldest one is still chugging along reliably. It's a 4Plex and frankly I think the thing is still plenty quick enough.

      Plextor goes out of the business that's news. Yamaha getting out of this area is closer to "so what".

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    23. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Annnnnnd then there's me. I was a Plextor evangelist until I threw a chair at mine (long story... basically the drive was open, I was in a bad mood and I slammed my desk chair under the desk; it missed and hit the CD tray). The damage made the drive no longer open and close. I sent it in for service, which IIRC was free, but when it came back, they had put some kind of evil debugging firmware on it, and no CD software other than Nero would recognize it. Even Plextor's own firmware upgrade util wouldn't recognize it. Blah. Turned me off to the things altogether.

    24. Re:Doesn't hurt me by InfernoBlade · · Score: 1

      Liteon and high quality? Someone's been smoking some seriously good shit.

      Here, let me enlighten you. Liteon drives have some of the HIGHEST C1/C2 error rates in the business, they have horrible track wobble.... they're in general pieces of shit. Here's a nice documentation of it, Dont mind the French, the graphs are all that matter. And note that those tests were perfomed using both the best consumer CDR media in existance (Taiyo Yuden) and some average consumer grade stuff, the TDK discs.

      Not to mention sudden Liteon death syndrome.... I owned 2 liteon drives, the DVD drive stopped being able to read dual layer discs after about 6 months, the CDRW drive produced discs that were damn unreadable in the same time period.

    25. Re:Doesn't hurt me by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Actually, a lot of the retail box Plextors available in the U.S. are grey-market (made for sale in Europe) and DO include Nero. Frex, mine did. Personally, I can't stand Nero and would gladly have traded it for EZCD. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  6. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He means "image" as in making a pretty picture on the non-data side of the CD. Read the link in the fucking article, genius boy.

  7. profits are leaving the CD-RW market by Indy1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and yamaha knows they arent in a position to compete with the likes of Lite-on, Msi, LG, etc. Face it, the CD-RW has reached the end point as far as innovation goes. A modern Lite-on burner can record to even the shittiest media, handles most forms of copy protection without grief, can be purchased for under $60, and never coasters a disk.

    The next big frontier is Dvd recorderables, which is still a mess. And i am sure thats what yamaha is looking at for potential profits.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  8. as long as.. by crumbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..they keeping making cycles like the YZF R-1 I'm happy. CD burners are a commodity item, I don't care about the brand name. Remember, they are the music & motorcycles company.

    1. Re:as long as.. by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Long live the R series!

      R1 is in bad need of a makeover though :(

      GSX-R 1000 is the king right now.

    2. Re:as long as.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and pianoes and keyboards! I bought a $200 keyboard with MIDI, 192 sounds, touch sensitive and a GREAT grand piano sound.

    3. Re:as long as.. by CaseyB · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep, Gixxers rock. They're perfect Darwinian accelerators, killing stupid people at a fantastic rate.

    4. Re:as long as.. by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Not as fast as Honda Civics ;-)

      [kill rate, NOT acceleration rate]

      which is good two-fold:

      1. less civics on the road
      2. less honda-boys on the road

    5. Re:as long as.. by cactopus · · Score: 2, Funny

      And pianos

      Maybe a piano made out of CD-R/RW material...nah too Liberacci

    6. Re:as long as.. by CaseyB · · Score: 1
      Hey! I drive a Civic.

      Unmodified, non-VTEC sedan though. Probably not what you were thinking.

    7. Re:as long as.. by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1
      my first bike was a Yamaha XS-400. kick-started that thing until blue before realizing you have to put gas in it first! (what can i say, i was 19 at the time.) kick-starters on bikes should be mandatory; zipping around on the CBR600F4 these days is nice but thumbing the electric start is no substitute for the gutteral sensations of a kick-starter. oh, the lost mystique...

      the other Yamaha i had was a FG-something, a very nice thin-neck (folk) guitar. those six steel strings cut into my fingers and gave me some soul.

      (yeah "offtopic" but that means your scope is too narrow. ;-)

    8. Re:as long as.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.yamaha.com/cgi-win/webcgi.exe/DsplyMode l/?gACG00002C3+NEO

    9. Re:as long as.. by Nexx · · Score: 1

      What, you mean you didn't put the VTEC-sticker on it? For shame! *g*.

      A friend of mine drives a Honda. She loves her civic too. Me, I find it too small, even in the front seat. Now, it's moot. I take the train

    10. Re:as long as.. by tbuskey · · Score: 1

      The YZ-450F and YZ-250F that revolutionized the off road motocross world. The WR enduro models are cool too. If only they'd put decent silencers on them and made 'em easy to start. Wait, the WRs have electric start

    11. Re:as long as.. by crumbz · · Score: 1

      the problem is that the compression on these bikes require well beyond what you could achieve kick starting them. oh well....

    12. Re:as long as.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Uhh, they just re-designed it in 2002 and it looks killer.

      Too bad I bought a brand new 2001, grrr.

  9. In related news..... by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Funny

    In related news an RIAA accountant reported the mysterious dissapearence of millions of dollars from the organizations budget. Across the Pacific in Tokyo, a Yamaha senior exectuive just bought himself a new Ferrari.

    1. Re:In related news..... by vrassoc · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...the executive has since claimed that he merely stated in a meeting: "No mo' seedy 'all", meaning, "No more city hall", because he was tired of the endless tea ceremonies that he had to attend with city officials.

      Unfortunately "No mo' seedy 'all" was interpreted by his pretty, blonde secretary who was taking minutes, as "No more CD-R". He has denied owning a Ferrari.

  10. Re:Question / Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are a moron.

  11. Makes sense: by holysin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a) burning "images" on a cd i just a marketing thing, generally speaking the average user that burns cds would like to use ALL of the cd for data (or music!!!!) storage. b) as has been mentioned before, cdrws are cheap, they will remain cheap, therefor they can't mark up the cdrws to the place where they will be happy. (Thank companies like lite-on.... I do daily :) ). Yamaha's have always been known as decent burners, if more then a little overpriced. They won't be missed by most of the community.

    1. Re:Makes sense: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, that's not true for a lot of users. Sure, I pack most of my CDs full, but most CD-Rs used to distributing music or data are not full.

      It's still a marketing thing. Imaging how cool your band woud be if your demo CD has an image on it.

    2. Re:Makes sense: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The images are burned between where the data is written, there is no loss of storage space by burning an image.

    3. Re:Makes sense: by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hell no! I use CDs largely for backups and shifting project trees to and from work. They are seldom more than 40-50% full. As there is never a permanent marker around when I want one, and as my handwriting is at best messy, I would love to be able to use this as a means of labelling CDs. If the tool could take the CD title and append the date and time, and image that onto the data side of the disk then that would be perfect.

      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    4. Re:Makes sense: by mattyohe · · Score: 1

      i find it humourus that people write like they know what they are talking about.. But have obviously never used the product, and never read anything to support their "claim"

      you are incorrect sir... You must burn the data first and the TOC must be written before an "IMAGE" can be written.

      --
      - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    5. Re:Makes sense: by holysin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it CAN I'm sure (but only with nero 5.5 it seems ;-) ), however the yamaha (44x)cd burner that does this is between 69 (refurbished) and 86+ bucks a pop (new) after being out for 3+ months. The refurbished price is more then lite-on's 52x24x52 drive is new... true you don't save much time, but since the tattoing also takes "a while", you're sacrificing even more speed. If I absolutely have to label a cd for others to read (remember, this is on the data side, so if you're giving it to a non tech person, and you do support be ready to support why the cd doesn't work if you don't make sure they understand that the label is on the bottom :) ), I'd label the top of a cd with a cheap cd label :) But for the most part, I just use a sharpe, and try to read my handwriting :) (I keep one sharpe connected to my burning computer since I keep losing my sharpes ;-) ) Some say it doesn't decrease the total writable area of the cdr (if you don't overburn), but since I haven't actually spent the $ to try this technology I can't confirm or deny that it will let you stuff a cd full of music/data and label it too, to quote the article: "On a tattooed CD-R, there will be a zone with data encoded by the EFM process and another corresponding to the blank data-free spaces, where graphics and text will be visible. " if your cd is 75% full it'll let you tattoo it, but at 100% or 101 I wonder if it still will, anyone have one of these and want to chime in? To me it's useless, and I'm a gadget guy, I guess I just am more of a speed freak then a gadget guy (or maybe I'm just price concious...) I'm guessing this "tattooing" drive didn't give Yamaha the boost they wanted.

    6. Re:Makes sense: by mattyohe · · Score: 2, Informative

      People don't know what/who to believe in on slashdot anymore.. So here is a link to CNet:

      http://hwreviews.netscape.com/hardware/0-1095-405- 20192504-2.html?tag=rating

      By far, the Yamaha's most interesting feature is its DiscT@2 (or Disc Tattoo) Laser Labeling System, which lets you burn graphics and text, such as signatures, logos, or pictures, directly onto the unused portion of CD-Rs. For example, you could burn the words 2001 Holiday Season all the way around the edge of a CD-R containing family photos. You can use any CD-R media with DiscT@2, regardless of brand name or speed, but we found the text to be more visible on CD-Rs with a dark-blue dye. On the downside, the DiscT@2 software can be difficult to master, and the included manual provides little instruction.

      --
      - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    7. Re:Makes sense: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yamahas (and Plextors for that matter) have always been a higher range burner... Yamahas usually the ones to be looking at for Audio authoring.

      We were looking at the Yamaha for distribution of software, mainly because our software only actually has about 100MB or less on a CD. This leaves a large percentage of the disk space for copy authenticity stuff :)
      So we'll have to make a quick decision before stores run out.

    8. Re:Makes sense: by shepd · · Score: 1

      I think I'd like to get one of these drives just to add "THIS SIDE DOWN" as the tattoo...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    9. Re:Makes sense: by Forgotten · · Score: 1

      Yup - but what would be really interesting is an encoding scheme to munge the data so that the chosen image would be produced across the entirety of the (full) disc, while still preserving a reasonable percentage of the optimal storage capacity. The details of doing that would resemble a compression scheme, though more likely with the opposite effect.

      Offhand I don't see a reason why this couldn't be accomplished in software (by a modified Linux CD driver, for instance). Has anyone already done something like this?

      It wouldn't be very efficient, of course (either in storage or in access speed - it might actually require caching the entire CD contents in order to extract the data), but then it's not like wanting to get an image on the CD in the first place makes that much sense anyway. ;)

    10. Re:Makes sense: by mattyohe · · Score: 1

      It would be difficult because the hardware is built to do this, this isn't "software specific". A normal laser has specific areas that it can write to but the CRW-F1 has eliminated these rules to make MUCH finer "zones"

      From the article you should have been reading:
      Yamaha has bypassed the EFM process which restricts zone size to between 3T (0.83 micrometers at 1.2 m/s) and 11T (3.05 micrometers at 1.2 m/s).

      --
      - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    11. Re:Makes sense: by Forgotten · · Score: 1

      I do understand that; I still think it's possible to write an image in regular data with a standard CD-R burner. It might be fainter than the Yamaha drive produced, but it would be visible in the right light or at the right angle.

      The trick is to construct a dictionary so that writing large repeating sequences of pits or lands represents data while also building the picture - for instance twenty pits and a land would be one entry, thirty pits and a land would be another. Like I said, not necessarily any more efficient than simply dedicating part of the disc, but a neater hack. ;)

      It occurs to me now that the built-in error correction and block structure could create some issues, though.

  12. beat goes on by djupedal · · Score: 1
    Whether this is out of respect for DVD burners or our of fear of competition, it is simply in reaction to an ever evolving tech market. CRT's are going away...floppies are dead...finally.

    List of things that won't be around much longer:
    • modems
    • wired keyboards/mice
    • 700~800mb CDs
    • analog displays
    1. Re:beat goes on by NineNine · · Score: 1

      [shaking head]... I'm so glad there is somebody willing to be on the cutting edge of tech products. They make regular, reliable products so much cheaper for the rest of us.

    2. Re:beat goes on by pfguy · · Score: 1

      I will never use a wireless mouse, not unless they make it so that you never have to replace the battery.

    3. Re:beat goes on by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only I must disagree with is the wired keyboards/mice. I will probably always prefer a corded mice/keyboard to a non-corded version primary for latency/security/lan party issues. Until the wireless versions become as secure as the corded version, I think they'll stay around for a while.

    4. Re:beat goes on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget REPLACING the battery, what about the weight? You should not have to even notice the weight of a mouse! What's all the extra weight doing for the rate of carpal tunnel, I wonder?

    5. Re:beat goes on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modems - Last I checked, the vast majority of internet users access the internet via a modem.

      Wired keyboards/mice - legacy ports are still sticking around. these have to go first. maybe blue tooth will help out with this, but thats not happening anytime super soon.

      700 meg CDs....go to the store, there's thousands of them. No such things as 800 meg cds. maybe you mean 80 minute?

      Analog Displays. CHEAP. can't beat cheap. another few years and LCDs might be more mainstream. more and more companies are abandoning CRT manufacturing altogether. but there will still be people creating crappy monitors for mass consuming.

      all in all, hardware doesn't really go anywhere. mainframes are still great. as/400 networks. frame relay networks, old laptops. tape media. it all has a place in the world.

    6. Re:beat goes on by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      modems

      Except for the majority of the world who can't get any form of high speed access. But cell phones and landlines work just fine for low speed modems.

      wired keyboards/mice

      Except for the vast number of users who don't like replacing batteries in their keyboard/mouse, don't like the interference problems, and don't like the additional latency.

      700~800mb CDs

      Ok... I'll agree these are doomed to obscurity, but not for another 5 years or so. Maybe more. The DVD rewriteable market is still busy screwing itself due to a lack of standards. Until one clear standard comes about (or the various standards become irrelevant due to writer and reader interoperability) CD-R/RW is going to keep a huge chunk of the market.

      analog displays

      Except that CRT tubes still give far better blacks than any digital display, and do better than any current production method for color range, color accuracy, refresh, and half a dozen other things... yeah, I want my HDTV to be DLP/LCD/LCOS/D-ILA, but it has a lot less strenuous requirements than a monitor.

    7. Re:beat goes on by pfguy · · Score: 1

      Now that they have Bluetooth enabled mice and keyboards, security isn't a problem.

    8. Re:beat goes on by JBark · · Score: 2, Informative

      Logitech MX700. Drop the mouse in the base (also the receiver), and it charges the batteries in around 30 minutes. I get around 3-4 days on a full charge. And it doesn't lag, thanks to FastRF. I've got one, and its the best mouse I've ever owned. No more mouse cord snagging on everything.

    9. Re:beat goes on by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Try the Logitech MX700. You do have to recharge it every few days for a couple hours, but I don't see a problem since most people sleep at least the 2-3 hours it takes to charge fully.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    10. Re:beat goes on by sugam · · Score: 1
      Thats a good list.

      A really good way to see where the computer industry is heading is by watching where Apple has already gone. Last week, about 5 years after Apple announced the death of the floppy, Dell came along and agreed.

      Last year, Apple announced the death of the CRT. Soon enough, others will follow suit, have you used one of those cinema displays?! Its amazing that we used to actually work at a point using a CRT.

      What is apple doing now? Well, its the "Year of the Notebook" So maybe in 5 - 10 years, it will be shocking that anyone had a gigantic box sitting under his/her desk. Who knows?

      what I dont get is why you're saying 700-800 MB CDs are going away? I mostly use my burner for burning audio cds, will my car cd player play anything else?

      --
      read my blog
    11. Re:beat goes on by Absurd+Being · · Score: 1

      Want a battery you don't have to change? Get an atomic wireless optical gyro mouse. Change the battery once every 40 years, or the nearest half-life.

      --
      Karma: Excellent^(-t/Tau), Tau=Wittiness/Trollishness
    12. Re:beat goes on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What security issues are involved with a wireless mouse? A wireless mouse is much more useful than a wireless keyboard anyways. Most people don't move their keyboard around constantly, if at all.

    13. Re:beat goes on by joshsisk · · Score: 1
    14. Re:beat goes on by pfguy · · Score: 1

      http://www.3dxtreme.org/logitech_mx700_p2.shtml

      Cons
      - Heavier than your standard mouse
      - Batteries will eventually need to be changed
      - Expensive


      Call me hard to please if you want, but that list of cons will have me refrain from buying the MX700 for awhile. A $4 Mouse Bungee keeps by cord from snagging.

    15. Re:beat goes on by kasek · · Score: 1

      im with ya on that one, i just took the modem outta my compuer to make room for the USB 2.0 card, so i could have some extra ports to plug my new wireless keyboard and mouse into.

      On the topic of yamaha burners, i was initially happy with my 2100i (16x12x40) burner until i realized it sucks ass at ripping CDs, and sounds like a god damned jet taking off when its trying to read a disc.

    16. Re:beat goes on by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1

      Except for the majority of the world who can't get any form of high speed access. But cell phones and landlines work just fine for low speed modems. Right now, yes. But, it is a matter of maybe ten years before wireless broadband makes regular modems useless in the first world.

    17. Re:beat goes on by Ramze · · Score: 1

      Modems will be around, unfortunately, for another decade at least due to the slow growth of broadband services and wireless. Wired keyboards and mice will likely never go away. Nomatter how "secure" people think the wireless ones are, it is still another point of attack for hackers to use if they are anywhere in the broadcast radius or use an amplifier. There's too much cross-talk between them today to even consider using them in a dorm or apartment environment, but even if they were encrypted and varied frequencies, there would always be a possibility for intentional attacks. Not to mention the fact that I would never, ever need a wireless keyboard or care to have one which required a battery replacement & I don't have any need for a wireless mouse either... most people keep them on their desk with their computer & don't mind the wire. Now... I do think optical mice will replace those with balls inside, but that's another story ;-) CD's are just now becoming mainstream in the RW department. CDs will likely replace floppies as the major file transfer and boot-disk medium since CD-RW drives are in nearly all PC's sold today & most PC manufacturers are considering getting rid of the floppy. I would prefer USB pen drives, however they are much more expensive and even machines without USB support can read a CD usually. if, by Analog Displays you mean CRT monitors, I hope you are right, but I have yet to see anything that compares to the quality and price of a CRT monitor. Perhaps by "not much longer" you mean "only another 20 to 50 years"

    18. Re:beat goes on by BigDish · · Score: 1

      If it can be received, it can, and in a case like this, WILL be cracked.

    19. Re:beat goes on by BigDish · · Score: 1

      I'll be sticking with my wired keyboard and mouse on my desktop for a while longer for a few reasons. 1. Security. Nothing beats a wire for security. Even if the traffic is encrypted (which I don't believe to be the case) the encryption will be broken-it's just a matter of time 2. Convience. That's right. I find a wired mouse more convient. Like many geeks, I'm a tad messy. I look at the cord on my mouse as a teather. I can always follow the cord to find my mouse. Also, when my mouse falls off the desk, the cord catches it. 3. No batteries to replace. Replacing the batteries (or having yet another charger on my desk) would just be one more annoyance. Wireless keyboards and mice DO have their place (a home theater PC comes to mind) but I don't have a need, or really a want, for one on my desktop.

    20. Re:beat goes on by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      But, it is a matter of maybe ten years before wireless broadband makes regular modems useless in the first world.

      Yeah, for your sardines living in high density housing. The hell with that.

      I like it out here a lot. It's quiet in the night, all I hear in the spring and summer is the bullfrogs and the crickets.

      It sucks that all I can get is dialup internet, but I picked a provider who sold me an always-on 56K connection that connect a NetBSD NAT server to, so I can pretend all my boxes have a broadband connection....

    21. Re:beat goes on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God for that! Everyone in the computer security world can go home now. Bluetooth is perfect unbreakable security and will remain that way forever. About dang time too!

    22. Re:beat goes on by pfguy · · Score: 1

      Fine let me clarify: It isn't as MUCH of a problem.

      It must feel so good to be so right, to know so much more than everyone else. I'm sure YOU never make a mistake... nope never.

      God, they don't call you Anonymous Cowards for nothing.

    23. Re:beat goes on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll stick around with my modem until they land a human being on Mars!

    24. Re:beat goes on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a common misconception that LCD's will replace CRT's. It will not. The future is in OLED's. I've seen a demo of it showing a display that can be rolled like a scroll. There's also research going on using charged inks. A possible application would be newspapers where the special edition is whenever you open the newspaper.

  13. Well, I work for a small OEM... by Akardam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... and it's been my experience that there are cheaper and more reliable alternatives out there now. Samsung in particular is what we use most of the time. They're inexpensive and reliable, and we've had maybe 1 bad unit in 500. I don't remember exact numbers, but we used to have a pretty high DOA or >6mo failure on the Yamaha IDE burners (their SCSI burners were always great, but then again they were expensive, too).

    On a broader view, I see that burners are becoming commodized (sp?). Anyone can make a burner these days. Perhaps they'll stay in the semi-cutting edge markets like DVD burning?

    1. Re:Well, I work for a small OEM... by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

      Their SCSI drives were good until they started releasing those IDE drives with SCSI connector converters. Those converters were the cause of much wailing and gnashing of teeth.

      Their email tech support also sucked/sucks eggs. If you managed to get a response, it was always to the effect of PEBKAC. Funnily enough in my case, the problem was alsways resolved by replacing the often-flawed Yamaha hardware.

    2. Re:Well, I work for a small OEM... by eglamkowski · · Score: 1

      My Yamaha SCSI CD-ROM works beautifully. It's over three years old and is a pitiful 4x speed, but I'm not desparate enough for speed to want to replace it as long it still works. Also, I'm not burning huge numbers of CDs (rather, I use it to do backups, which is mostly about once a month), so usage is fairly low. Still, I've been very, very happy with it.

      --
      Government IS the problem.
    3. Re:Well, I work for a small OEM... by eglamkowski · · Score: 1

      Er, CD-RW. Duh.

      --
      Government IS the problem.
    4. Re:Well, I work for a small OEM... by aanantha · · Score: 1

      The 4x SCSI's were great drives. But a lot of people had problems with their 16x and faster drives. I have 2 friends that each have had their 16x Yamaha drives die on them.

    5. Re:Well, I work for a small OEM... by swtaarrs · · Score: 0

      Yeah, my grandfather had a Yamaha 16x and it died after about 15 music cds. While it worked, it worked great, but it just didn't last.

    6. Re:Well, I work for a small OEM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the lfie of me, and I cannot figure out why, but if you turn on CD-TEXT during an audio burn on a Samsung drive the TOC gets completely screwed up and tracks will begin in the middle of songs.

    7. Re:Well, I work for a small OEM... by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      I've personally had great luck with Ricoh burners. My two 12x drives burn like butter. But in general it seems several companies have inexpensive burners that work just fine. And in all onesty.. does it really need ot last more than 2-3 years? After that you're gonna have upgraded out of it anyhow. And if you just need osmethign cheap... A new one will cost next to nothign byt hen anyhow.

    8. Re:Well, I work for a small OEM... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I've owned 3 and received reports on 8 more Yamaha CDRWs. ALL ELEVEN died at an early age (less than 24 months for 4x; 9 to 11 months for 6x or faster). Basic design problem: overheating warps laser out of alignment.

      I can't say I'm sorry to see Yamaha leave the market. My last CDRW was a Lite-On, at 1/3rd the price for a Yamaha, and better longevity per user reports (haven't heard of a dead one yet).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:Well, I work for a small OEM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...I see that burners are becoming commodized...


      You mean they are becoming toilets?!

  14. your IP utopia will never happen . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You IP lovers will not get what you want. Things will only get MUCH worse for you, soon we'll have no intellectual property laws at all. Your utopia of intellectual property control will never happen.

  15. Re:slashdotted by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

    very clever.

    I about spit Dr Pepper all over my monitor.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  16. Re:slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    You are annoying. Quit posting stories in the comments, with your own, off topic, pseudo-political messages, when there is no need to. Who is voting this stuff up? You don't even trim the unnecessary stuff. The site is not slashdotted, you are just being a bitch.

  17. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by thelexx · · Score: 1

    I think they were referring to the ability to 'burn' an image physically onto the top face of the CD itself.

    --
    "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  18. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by coug_ · · Score: 1

    Someone seriously needs to mod this one up (or mod the original down, as it's extremely dumb and pointless). He's right, the original poster obviously didn't read the Tom's Hardware article about the CD writer that can create pictures on the bottom of the CD (well, only where no data is written.. making the feature virtually useless).

  19. not an iso image, an actual picture on the surface by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yamaha released an burner that allowed you to burn an image to the blank portion of a CD-R

    So, if you only filled half the disc with data, you'd have a portion of empty space around the outside where the burner could write an image - say your company logo, or some text or graphics.

    It was slow, however, and only monochromatic. It looked cool though.

  20. This was known for while by Escher0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I remember reading a review of the burner that makes images on the cd and vaugely rememeber reading that this was going to be their last drive.

    Found the link, its here: http://www6.tomshardware.com/storage/20020927/inde x.html

    and the quote:
    "Since the CRW 3200, Yamaha had been sitting on the sidelines of the speed race with no offer of a 32 or 40X recorder, as opposed to the rest of the providers in the market, though they were by no means resting on their laurels. They were actually developing what was to become their last CD-RW recorder before going on to the DVD+RW."

  21. They will be missed. by jstockdale · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know how many other people out there were dedicated fans of Yamaha's drives, but I can tell you as a user who owns both their old 6x4x16 and 24x10x40 model of internal SCSI burners that they are really unparalleled. For the upper end market demanding the performance of SCSI (which most other drive makers have abandoned, but alas I won't go off on my SCSI rant today :) these were the best drives, and were reliable (almost all the failed burns were a result of third party software or other software problems that resulted from my own mistakes). I recall many times when I would be burning a cd, while either doing on graphics work, gaming, or watching a movie, and these things kept on burning.

    Its a sad day to see one of the pioneers of burning technology leave the arena. They will be missed.

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
    1. Re:They will be missed. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      Well, the 6x4x16 that I had failed (laser stopped working, not a software problem) just after the warranty expired and they were singularly useless about getting it replaced or fixed. Basically, they offered me $50 off a new one, but it still would have cost more than other brands.

      I went and got a Teac SCSI burner and it's been fine (except for a buggy firmware release that broke cdrecord). Of course, its warranty hasn't expired yet...

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    2. Re:They will be missed. by e40 · · Score: 1

      I had a couple of Yamaha drives, and I found they were really, really picky about SCSI termination. In fact, I always suspected they caused termination problems. When I removed their drive from my system, I had many fewer SCSI problems. Of course, I'm mostly IDE these days (have an IDE DVD+RW that works fine, and am lusting after the forthcoming Plextor DVD+RW drive).

    3. Re:They will be missed. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      they are paralleled; in fact exceeded. by plextor.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:They will be missed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. ive got their 6x4x16 and 16x scsi burners, running great all along. if they had >24x scsi burners id own those too. i didnt like that ide->scsi adapter they made for the later generation drives.

    5. Re:They will be missed. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      My Yamaha SCSIs (6x) moved right in without giving a flip what the SCSI termination did or didn't, on an ancient AHA-1510 no less. NO problem in that area. And initially, it worked fine (no software problem either). What I *did* discover is that they die early due to overheating leading to the laser warping out of alignment. Out of 11 Yamaha CDRWs that I've tracked (3 being mine) all 11 died very young (4x at no more than 24mos; 6x and faster at 9 to 11 mos.)

      I've since bought a Plextor and a Lite-On, and I won't miss Yamaha's contribution to the market one bit.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  22. DVDs the future by Valiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, with new technology that allows DVD media to burn and hold 27GB of data per side, I'm not surprised they are pulling out of CD-R/RW. Maybe they'll jump into the DVD business.

    --

    -Valiss
  23. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by Sepherus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thats not what was meant. By "image" the writer meant a pattern on the surface of the disk itself. More info available here.

  24. Quality by shaklee · · Score: 1

    Yamaha burners have been lacking in quality lately and they were way overpriced. Back when plextor and yamaha were the only decent cd burners on the markey (when 8x was new) they were among the best out. Lately companies like lite-on have produced sub $70 burners and yamaha just cannot compete at that level. I still have one of their 4x scsi burners and it has never failed me.

    1. Re:Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...Back when plextor and yamaha were the only decent cd burners on the markey (when 8x was new)...

      True, Plex and Yammy won all the reviews back then, but to say they were "the only decent burners" is a bit of a stretch. I have 8x drives from Mitsumi and Ricoh that kicked ass then and are still going strong today, each burning several dozen CDs a week.

  25. Re:slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    >> Quit posting stories in the comments, with your own, off topic, pseudo-political messages, when there is no need to.

    michael does the same thing on the front page. so whats yer beef?

  26. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by RomikQ · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you should read the link before posting.

    Some yamaha burners can actually burn a picture onto the media side of the cd. Its pretty useless but it looks very very cool.

    Actually, I can understand their decision. When the market is flooded with companies that make a product, R&D can become very costly if you want to keep your marketshare. It's much easier to go after new technologies with more potential(like DVD recording)

    --
    Join the elite! Post at score:2! Ghostwheel is online.
  27. Re:slashdotted by Malc · · Score: 1

    LOL! Have any of the moderators actually read this piece? It should by moderated as funny, not interesting or informative!

  28. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by WiPEOUT · · Score: 1

    Life's rule #44583: if it appears that something really, really stupid has been said/posted, check and re-check your assumptions about what is stupid, or your response is likely to be really, really stupid.

    The reference here is to burning images -- as in pictures -- onto the CD.

    Read the article before rushing to get fp next time.

  29. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 1

    He was talking about yamaha's exclusive T@2 feature. It actually burns visible graphics/text into the unused data portion of the cdr.

    --
    0xfeedface
  30. Overrated images... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Those images were overrated anyways. If you look closely, you could only burn images on areas WITHOUT data. Which means a pretty picture with 15 min of music? No thanks.

    The only use I could see is if you had your portfolio / resume on there with maybe 100 megs filled, and the rest filled with the image. Still, no thanks.

    1. Re:Overrated images... by alexburke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd certainly find some use in 700MB CDs filled with 650MB of data and a thin band of text around the outside mentioning what's on the CD. What a neat trick, and I'd never have to use my Sharpie ever again. (Never lose that CD key! Is that an 8 or a B? And so on...)

    2. Re:Overrated images... by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 1

      If the CD-key is on the CD, wouldn't it be kinda hard to read while your trying to install?

    3. Re:Overrated images... by alexburke · · Score: 1

      If the CD-key is on the CD, wouldn't it be kinda hard to read while your trying to install?

      That's what the button on the front of the drive(marked with an upwards-pointing arrow above a horizontal line) is for.

      Copying the CD key to the clipboard before inserting the disc is usually a good idea -- then you just need to paste the contents of the clipboard into the appropriate box during installation.

  31. They aren't that great by fetus · · Score: 0

    Back in my freshman year of collegem my roommate and i both had the same yamaha burner 4x2x4. Mine stopped working and I sent it in to be fixed (for free). Then about 6 months later it stopped working again and yamaha wanted over $300 to replace the broken part. Very soon after, my roommates burner also stopped working. I expect a burner to last more than 1 year god damn it. good riddens!

  32. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virtually all CD-ROM Burns will take make a CD from a file, as long as you have the right software. All the Burner software under Linux does, so does EasyCD Creator, and Nero under Windows.

    Horrible grammar not withstanding, SOME of Yamaha's drives can burn GRAPHICAL images to the disc medium.

    Any drive can do this..I bet it would be pretty easy to make a little program that took a bitmap and spit out an ISO of the right size with the right pattern of 1's and 0's. The trick would be getting cdrecord to burn it so the drive/OS don't try to read it.

    Of course, they've probably patented the whole thing, but It's not that great anyway- it only works on the data-side of the disk, and only on the area left over after you burn your data.

    As for labels on the non-media side, Sharpie seems to have cornered the market :-)

  33. Very true... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How cheap are CD Burners? This week, OfficeMax ran a promotion where you buy a Cendyne 48x burner and a 100 pack of cd-r's, they would give you the burner free after 2 rebates. Yes, I know alot of people hate rebates, but $25 for a burner and 100 cd's is pretty cheap, and there can't be much in the way of profits in that. I regularly see retailers offering 48x burners for $10 to $20 after rebates. That's cheaper than retail on a CD-ROM.

    1. Re:Very true... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      How cheap are CD Burners?

      Well, around Christmas, I got a Lite-On LTR-52246 52x24x52 from Newegg for $69.99 w/free shipping, it's on sale for $54 at the moment though.

      Not much in the way of freebies or rebates, but it's worked like a dream so far...~75 CD's burnt of all different types, not a single coaster.

    2. Re:Very true... by Nexx · · Score: 1
      My Yamaha 4x is working still, after burning at least 5CD's/week (no, not warez) for the past 5-6 years. After going through warantee service at two weeks, it outlived the following:
      • AMD K6-200
      • AMD K6-400
      • FIC Motherboard for the above processors
      • a pair of PII-300
      • Asus P2B-D
      • Adaptec 2940 SCSI card
      • Matrox Millenium II
      • TNT-based video card
      • A generic case
      • An equally generic 250W PS
      • Even more generic 300W PS to replace the above

      It is now sitting in my gf's computer, still happily burning CD's (mainly audio CD's now, so she can leave those in her truck and not worry about them melting).

      I'm going to Akibahara this weekend to go pick me up a pair of Yamaha's. SCSI if I can find it (with various boxes around, it's just less hassle), but IDE will do just fine.

  34. Out of making the actual media as well? by vistic · · Score: 0

    Or are they just stopping to make hardware? (Yah yah, I'll read the actual article in a minute, okay?)

    But I did want to say that I love Yamaha's actual CD-R's. The ones that are just silver and only have their logo really small in the center. They burn better than any other brand on my HP burner.

    Or are Yamaha's discs just rebranded cheap stuff?

  35. Who cares... by jonr · · Score: 3, Funny

    I only use Trogdor Burninator CD-RW drives...

    1. Re:Who cares... by Cheeziologist · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And the dragon comes in the Niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight

    2. Re:Who cares... by batboy78 · · Score: 1

      At least you could do is add the link for the fools that don't know what you are talking about. Strong Bad Email.

    3. Re:Who cares... by kchayer · · Score: 1
      I only use Trogdor Burninator CD-RW drives...

      I would, but I have a hard time getting the peasants and countryside into the burninator slot...

      "I said consummate V's! Sheesh."

      --

      "I say consider this day seized!" -Hobbes
      "Tomorrow we'll seize the day and throttle it!" -Calvin
    4. Re:Who cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      burninating the peasants!

  36. burn images = print pictures on the disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the author meant that the Yamama burners will print a picture onto the disc itself. I don't think it has anything to do with putting JPGs onto a CD's filesystem, or turning an ISO into a CD-ROM.

    1. Re:burn images = print pictures on the disk by mattyohe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly.. The parent was just saying that there would be no room for most of the cds he makes because usually he likes to fill them up with data, thus leaving no space for a physical image to be burned onto the media.

      --
      - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
  37. they r ~ the only 1 by vingufta · · Score: 0
    Since compact discs can only be spun up to a certain rotational speed without damage, makers of CD burners have said that the current generation will be the end of the road. Hewlett-Packard, in fact, reached this conclusion in late 2001.

    The truth shall set your teeth free

    1. Re:they r ~ the only 1 by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah they said 100mhz was as fast as a CPU could ever be clocked too.

      I dont see why they couldnt have 2 lasers burning the front and back half of the disc simultaneosly, jumping up to 120x burning.

      Thing is, if its burned in 2.5 minutes, is there really a market for 1.25 minute burning?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:they r ~ the only 1 by adzoox · · Score: 1
      There's a market for no wait, instantaneous, tatooing, make me a ham sandwich and call my wife, tell her, "I'm late" CDRWs!

      I agree with your reply though. I beleive they will be able to do something like you propose OR, go to a different laser color. I know blue lasers can burn more data faster on a CURRENT DVD-R

      The same theory was true in 1984 with a 20mB hard drive on my Mac. I thought, I'd never fill it up. I have 20 GB of MP3's today

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    3. Re:they r ~ the only 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I dont see why they couldnt have 2 lasers burning the front and back half of the disc simultaneosly, jumping up to 120x burning."

      Yeh. 120x in the same way an AMD Athlon is 3000 MHz :)

  38. Good Riddance! by linderdm · · Score: 1

    I had a very bad experience with my Yamaha CD Burner. Basically, it never worked. I would get "Calibration Area Full" errors. I tried everything their paltry support pages recommended. Nothing worked. I even sent it back to them, but they sent it back after doing some routine maintenance and said it was working. Nope. Still didn't work. Their customer support was not helpful at all in resolving my problems. I didn't start trying to burn CDs until about 6 months after I bought the drive, so the 1 year warranty quickly ran out before I was able to get the thing fixed. I kept getting the runaround about sending it back in, or trying something else. Good riddance!

    1. Re:Good Riddance! by MBCook · · Score: 1
      Was it an IDE drive? I'm not sure about those, but I've almost never heard of a problem with their SCSI drives. I have a old CRW4416S (a 4x4x16x SCSI drive) and it has taken any abuse that it gets. I've never had a single problem with it, despite things like my little sister not understanding that you need to take out the CD in the drive when you put a new one it. She asked me to fix the computer one day when one of her games wouldn't play, and I found 3 or 4 CDs in the drive. It survived just fine. I've now owned 2 drives, a IDE and a SCSI and both have been dreams to own. When they come out with a good DVD burning drive and I have use to upgrade, I'll buy Yamaha again.

      On the other hand the 2 or 3 HP drives I've tried were not worthy of paperweights.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  39. Copy protection? by swb · · Score: 1

    Do you mean that it can automatically not be fooled by copy-protected audio CDs?

    1. Re:Copy protection? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Nope, since the computer only sees the data portion of the disc.

      For example, if you burn 200mb of files to the disc, when you put it in a CD drive, the lead in says that the disc image is 200Mb in size, starts at point A, ends at pint B etc.

      It ignores the unburnt portion of the disc, which as far as the computer is concerned, doesn't exist, so it doesn't matter what is on it.

    2. Re:Copy protection? by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      If a burning SW can write on any place on CD I don't see why another software could not read any place on CD. Sure it wont be as simple as reading a file, but IMO can be done.

  40. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    >> Any drive can do this..

    No. Drives 'burn' in one continuous run, modulating the laser to make the pits and gaps. T@2 actually shut the laser off and on as the disc spun.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  41. And in other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...the board voted to give themselves a 30% raise.

    Furthermore, they said they would like to thank the RIAA and the MPAA for their support in this decision.

    1. Re:And in other news... by Datafage · · Score: 1

      They're still making DVD burners, which I imagine the *AAs are even less happy about.

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

  42. I could have sworn TDK had one, by Limburgher · · Score: 1

    but then I don't want to unintentionally purjer myself.

    --

    You are not the customer.

  43. Sharpie does the job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But would a nicely burned label have improved on this picture?

  44. No Loss by jonveit · · Score: 1

    I never liked my yamaha cdrw 2001ez burner (ide). I've had tons of buffer underruns and never got the protection to work right (I thought it was suppose to work automatically). In addition to that its terrible at ripping, sounding like a plane trying to take off yet sputtering at the end -- making tons of noise and not ripping very efficiently. At times it would freeze my entire computer. I've had multiple conifigurations and both windows xp and gentoo linux and neither seem to handle it any better. If anyone has advice about it please do but otherwise I'm trying to decide between getting a new burner or wait for the dvd rewriters come down in price.

  45. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "if it appears that something really, really stupid has been said/posted, check and re-check your assumptions about what is stupid"

    That rule doesn't apply on Slashdot...here's a variation that does:

    If it appears that something intelligent and insightful, without grammatical or puncuation errors has been posted on Slashdot, check and re-check the address of the page you are currently viewing.

  46. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me again...note the misspelling of "punctuation", obviously my brain was helping me make the point when it caused me to leave out the 't'.

  47. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course!-Hot tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that explanes why I couldn't "burn" this file. All it would do is sit there, and look hot.

  48. Who cares... by finder · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've never had anything but problems with Yamaha burners I've encountered.

  49. CD-R(W)s are Dead by MBCook · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Let's face it, there isn't a future in CD-R(W)s. They are no longer the huge storage they used to be, and they cost so little that it's hard to make money on them. We've reached the maximum speed that we can without putting 12 lasers in each drive, etc. which wouldn't be cost effective.

    The future in in DVD[-+]R(W)s. This is where they will be able to make money, and I hope that they do enter this arena as they are, IMHO, one of the best (if not the best) makers of drives on the market. I also hope that someone brings something like their disc tatoo tech to DVD drives. While this seems like bad news, it's not all that suprising. Time goes on, new technology overtakes the old. It's digital evolution.

    Look at me, I sound like a philosopher. He he he.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:CD-R(W)s are Dead by adzoox · · Score: 1
      I wish some manufacturer would put it in DVD-RW's as well. There will be a MUCH larger area to place graphics. I could put 2 CDs worth of data and have almost 3/4th's space of the DVD to "tatoo".

      I had posted this story to Slashdot a while back (rejected), and in my article asked that all /.'s interested; make it known to Yamaha that they have some liscensing potential on their hands, and that we encourage them to use it.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    2. Re:CD-R(W)s are Dead by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Look at me, I sound like a philosopher. He he he.

      Yeah, especially with that last part. Didn't Plato say the same thing?

    3. Re:CD-R(W)s are Dead by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The future in in DVD[-+]R(W)s.

      Don't you mean DVD[-+]R(W)(AM)s?

      And they accuse Americans of being nuts for coming out with VHS and Betha, or TDMA/CDMA... I think I see about 5-6 possible combinations of initials in those DVD recordable rechnologies, and my understanding is that they aren't generally intercompatible.

      When I can buy a burner that:

      1. Has affordable media.
      2. Writes disks readable by every PC DVD-ROM in existance, and ever PC DVD recorder as well.
      3. Writes disks that can be played by the DVD player in my living room.
      4. Costs less than $200.

      Then I might think about getting one...

  50. Not sure if that's a great idea. by zackbar · · Score: 1

    I've still got a lot of pr0n^H^H^H^H Data on floppy. What will I do if I can't read those? Dang. All my 5 1/4" disks are useless already. Don't take away my 3 1/2" disks too. Of course, the wireless keyboards aren't working too well. Starting to hear news reports of people unintentionally interfering with each other from thousands of yards away.

    1. Re:Not sure if that's a great idea. by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      I've still got a lot of pr0n^H^H^H^H Data on floppy. What will I do if I can't read those?

      You mean when you can't read those -- nothing to do with availablility of drives, they're going to rot!. Better get them onto a cd as soon as you can.

      ... a few years pass ...

      I've still got a lot of pr0n^H^H^H^H Data on cd. What will I do if I can't read those?

      You mean when you can't read those -- nothing to do with availablility of drives, they're going to rot!. Better get them onto a dvd as soon as you can.

      ... a few years pass ...

      I've still got a lot of pr0n^H^H^H^H Home videos on dvd. What will I do if I can't read those?

      You mean when you can't read those -- nothing to do with availablility of drives, they're going to rot!. Better get them onto a holo-crystal as soon as you can.

      ... a few years pass ...

      I've still got a lot of love-slave android personaliti^H^H^H^H Personal memory engram backups on holo-crystal. What will I do if I can't read those?

      Ah, but in Soviet Russia, what will you do when your holo-crystal can't read YOU!

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
  51. Time to upgrade... again. by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I mostly use my burner for burning audio cds, will my car cd player play anything else?

    I mostly use my tape deck for recording audio tapes, will my car tape player play anything else?

    There exist car MP3 players. Time to upgrade... again.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Time to upgrade... again. by sugam · · Score: 1
      There exist car MP3 players. Time to upgrade... again.

      Yes they do exist. Unfortunately, my car (and most cars i've seen) would look horrible with a 3rd party unit jammed inside a space that wont quite fit. I dont think car mp3 players will be successful until the car manufacturers have them come installed along with. Remember the time when cars came with tape decks? You had to use that audio-to-cassette conversion thing, it was a bitch.

      And what about everyone elses cd players and what not. CD's are here for a while, i'd say. The replacement? Well thats simple. A firewire port in my car/receiver/audio playing device into which I plug my iPod and have all my music.

      On the flipside, records are coming back, I just bought two turntables and a mixer so who knows. You cant quite mix a beat with mp3s (though Final Scratch looks very promising).

      --
      read my blog
    2. Re:Time to upgrade... again. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      You have these cassette-adapter thingies for your car. It's just a casette with a magnetic head in it and a cable coming out from the side. The cable hangs out of your car-casette player and you can hang anything on it. I personally use it to plug my portabel MiniDisc player into it. Guess, you could do that with a MP3 player too. Of course quality is not as high as purely digital, but neither are your standard audio-casettes;
      I have a recent car (3 years old) and it came with a casette player "in front" and a CD changer. I just don't like chaning the CD's every few days, because It's behind the seat and not really easy to access. So I work around it by using my MiniDisc player (yes, I know MiniDisc is not popular around here)

    3. Re:Time to upgrade... again. by kschrader · · Score: 1

      The replacement? Well thats simple. A firewire port in my car/receiver/audio playing device into which I plug my iPod and have all my music.

      Not exactly simple... can you tell that he works for Apple, ladies and gentlemen?

    4. Re:Time to upgrade... again. by Grahf666 · · Score: 1

      I'm not exactly sure how he does it, but a friend of mine plugs his iPod into his car stereo and listens to music from there. Good bye to carrying around that massive cd binder.

  52. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

    No, it was burn an image (text or otherwise) in the unused area on the data side of the disc. I seriously doubt that Yamaha could/would put in a second laser powerful enough to burn through the paint/ink on the top of the CD.

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  53. reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Does any other company make burners that can burn an image on the CD?"

    Most certainly. Plextor, LiteOn, Philips, and TDK just to name a few.

    1. Re:reply by adzoox · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, they don't, No other manufacturer currently has the technology the author is referring Disc@2 burns IMAGES (graphics) on the unused media portions of the CD.

      This was my MAJOR concern too. I hope they will license the technology out.

      It was a lot less time consuming and looked more professional to have the contents and a graphic (my logo) on a CD.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    2. Re:reply by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing that out. I don't know how many others were, but I thought he was talking about ISO images, which was kind of strange.

      On the other hand, I've often wondered about the utility of wasting most of the space on a CD for stuff that belongs on the label.

    3. Re:reply by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      If you'd read the article, you'd know what he was talking about.

      He means burning a picture onto the unused space on a CD - not writing data - all burners can do that!

      Nick...

  54. great, now i'll never get an OS X driver... by haaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    #@$&^@#...

    somehow I made the dumbass mistake of getting a Yamaha CD-RW that *wasn't* compatible with Mac OS X. Now my dear Blue G3 seems unable to boot from the latest OSX CDs. crud.

    fortunately, it wasn't *that* big a waste of cash, and I can probably swap it with a buddy for a good drive. [grumbling none the less]

    --
    -- haaz.
    1. Re:great, now i'll never get an OS X driver... by tupps · · Score: 3, Informative

      Best thing to do is check XLR8yourmac (www.xlr8yourmac.com) and check the drive databases before you buy a CDRW/DVD-RW drive.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
    2. Re:great, now i'll never get an OS X driver... by shepd · · Score: 1

      And I thought OS X was a unix variant...

      If it still is, why don't you just use this? It was the utility that made a linux box a permanent addition to my home...

      The only drives that don't work with that are a little less than a decade old, AFAIK...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  55. copy protected audio cd's by Indy1 · · Score: 1

    thats a MESS admittedly. It depends on what scheme they use for copy protection, but a lot of the protection schemes used for audio disks prevent them from EVEN being played in any sort of computer cdrom or cd-rw drive. Some car stereo's cant even handle these schemes. If your a big music phile and want to make backups of your disks, the best way to go is get a stereo with a good digitial or optical out, run it into your sound card, record it as a wave file, then use your favorite mp3 codec ( i suggest lame naturally) for the backups. I'm just glad all the music i like (60's and 70's rock) is already out there, so audio copy protection for me is a mute point.

    Of course, you just end up hitting Kazaa, and give the riaa fascists a giant middle finger anyways : )

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    1. Re:copy protected audio cd's by swb · · Score: 1

      I'm familiar with the copy protection schemes that futz with the layout and how they don't work with CDROM drives.

      It was also my understanding that it was possible for CD ROM vendors to upgrade the drive firmware to not be fooled by these schemes (DMCA, yadda yadda).

      I thought you might have meant that some of new cheapies cdrws out of asia had newer firmware that wasn't as fooled by these schemes.

    2. Re:copy protected audio cd's by be-fan · · Score: 3, Funny

      mute point
      >>>>>>>>>
      That's 'moot' point. But given the topic of discussion, that's a very interesting play on words :)

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:copy protected audio cd's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the word "moot" means exactly the opposite of how people like to use it. Using "mute" makes more sense logically. I think people subconsciously think of "mute" when they say "moot".

      moot adj 1: open to debate
      2: capable of being disproved

      But I don't suppose the misuse of "moot" is going away anytime soon. I can't think of anytime I've seen "moot" used correctly nor can I think of a decent replacement.

    4. Re:copy protected audio cd's by be-fan · · Score: 1

      From dictionary.com

      mootness n.
      Usage Note: The adjective moot is originally a legal term going back to the mid-16th century. It derives from the noun moot, in its sense of a hypothetical case argued as an exercise by law students. Consequently, a moot question is one that is arguable or open to debate. But in the mid-19th century people also began to look at the hypothetical side of moot as its essential meaning, and they started to use the word to mean "of no significance or relevance." Thus, a moot point, however debatable, is one that has no practical value. A number of critics have objected to this use, but 59 percent of the Usage Panel accepts it in the sentence The nominee himself chastised the White House for failing to do more to support him, but his concerns became moot when a number of Republicans announced that they, too, would oppose the nomination. When using moot one should be sure that the context makes clear which sense is meant.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:copy protected audio cd's by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      ok ok, so 5 hours of sleep makes for crappy typing :) sue me! : )

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  56. No say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    All I have used are Yamaha burners. I think in 3 years I made one coaster. Now that I have an F1, I was looking forward to see how they could top this burner. I hope they don't get out of the market, I know there are people out there willing to pay more for a good burner. I guess my money will start going towards a Plextor. RIP Yamaha CD-RW's.

  57. duplicate story by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    duplicate from days ago.

  58. sort of lame feature by fanatic · · Score: 0, Troll

    Does any other company make burners that can burn an image on the CD?


    This feature, even if it worked well (I never actually tried it), was lame, as it made the image on the data side, so to get an image of any resaonable size, you have to give up much capacity. Also, only one of the 2 or 3 kinds of CD-Rs available made a really distinct image.

    --
    "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
    1. Re:sort of lame feature by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree with you mostly, it was pretty much a gimmick.

      The only thing I thought it would be useful for would be a business like the one I'm in. We routinely burn disks with 50 megs on them for customers and for demo purposes, and it would have been 'neat' to put a slick tattoo of our logo on them, and invest in a nice cd-printer to do the label sides. Be something slick to hand out at trade shows.

      For home, I'd be more interested in a cheap, effective cd printer. Though I did have an old plotter that I jerry rigged to hold sharpies. It made some funky doodles on my unbranded CDs. Too bad it broke.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  59. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course!-Hot tools. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Image and File. :)

    +5 Funniest post I've ever read on slashdot.

  60. Any IDE Drive (will work) just about. by adzoox · · Score: 1
    What model is it andmaybe I can write a new plugin file for you or look on www.xlr8yourmac.com.

    The webmaster there has an ENORMOUS mod file database, if he doesn't have it, he'll usually post a request.

    You can also go into the terminal, locate the yamaha plugin, then just add your model, or use Hex Edit in OS 9 and replace with ResEdit.

    Which is actually another possibility. You could ask ResExcellence to post a tutorial on how to mod a CDRplugin file.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  61. Yes! Sanyo burns image. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny


    http://www.sunpowerusa.com/sanhelkittoa.html

  62. LG?? by Blueice88 · · Score: 0

    I have a LG CED 8080-B.And i be a happy user of LG.Something else use the CD-RW of LG??What are your opinion about the product??I burner my CDS at 4X, but it burner until 24X.Best regards.But ive heard my buddies talk about the CD-RW Yamaha, and them like very,very much.Best regards. Blueice88

  63. It DOES matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    • Virtually all of the CD-RW's out there can burn any CD, regardless of copy protection, as long as you use the right software. None of them cause buffer underruns. And while they may not be better than a Plextor, they're not worse either.
    Wrong. They ARE worse than Plextor. "Why?", you ask? Simple. EVERY CD burner makes little errors when burning (more so at high speeds.) Those errors are insignificant for your average geek; but if you're a producer/artist, it matters: you want your masters to be perfect. Plextor drives still have the lowest error margins.
    1. Re:It DOES matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plextors produce bit-imperfect copies that drives from other drive manufacturers do not. Yamaha drives are more accurate copying drives than Plextors, as are drives from Liteon and others.

      Go read the clonecd compatibility chart. www.elby.ch

    2. Re:It DOES matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... yet if you google on "CloneCD", you will find that the most popular, "best" CD-RWs are Lite-on's, not Plextors.

  64. Modems and Keyboards? by unicorn · · Score: 1

    Modems - There's still far from a guarantee that you'll find a high speed connection everywhere you go, with your laptop. Modems are going to be around for quite awhile still.

    Wired I/O devices - Hmmm. First of all, managing a compact office area, with lots of users in it, would be a nightmare if everyone was wireless. They work ok, if everyone's spread out. But in a very dense working environment, logistically, they would totally suck. And further more, while a wireless mouse *may* almost be worth the trouble. I don't see the point of a wireless keyboard, at all. It just doesn't move that much on a given day. And even if you did want to move around, how far can you get from the screen before you can't see what you're doing anyhow.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  65. Re:Infix to Postfix evaluation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean you can't look at it and see?

    Moron, you aren't even smart enough to go to the right forum to find someone to do your homework for you.

  66. What I'd like to see in car audio by yerricde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to see a car MP3 player that exposes a secure FTP interface over 802.11*. Upload music while the car is in your garage, and then drive off with tunes.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  67. Too bad by userunknown · · Score: 1

    I had a 4416S (I think it was) that would burn anything and was very reliable. I really liked that burner. Yamaha makes good CDRW drives it really is a shame.

  68. Doesn't this... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

    Doesn't this all mean nothing in the end? I mean is Yamaha dropping the CD-RW drive line to move on to something better, or are they dropping out entirely? Isn't the current standard of CD-Burners kind of going to die when Mount Rainier takes off anyway?

    It's starting to trickle in now, and when it finally gets a foot-hold CD-Authoring as we know it will no longer rely on proprietary packet-writing formats or cumbersom select and burn proceedures.

    I for one have dispised the way CD-RWs have worked for a long time now. Mount Rainier should have been the stardard from the start, and by waiting for so long to establish a standard they (Sony, Philips, Microsoft, etc.) have only hurt the industry.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    1. Re:Doesn't this... by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >> Isn't the current standard of CD-Burners kind of going to die when Mount Rainier takes off anyway?

      Why? Mount ranier is just for drag-n-drop packetwriting to a CD-RW, I dont see how it will affect burning real filesystems on CD-Rs at all. Every packetwriting software I've tried (DirectCD, abCD, blahblaCD) has been slow and crappy.

      OS-level support and faster burners will help, but CD-RWs still deteriorate pretty quickly when rewritten. This is the problem with all packetwriting software, the first 100 or so megs is where all the action takes place, and will wear out. Imagine a HDD that has sectors that go bad when they're rewritten only a few dozen times. This is what delayed standards, IMO; it's a stupid idea.

      I wouldnt send software to a client on a MtR disk any sooner than I'd send it on a stack of floppies.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Doesn't this... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wouldnt send software to a client on a MtR disk any sooner than I'd send it on a stack of floppies.

      I understand your paranoia about Packet Writing, because most of it has sucked until now. But the whole point behind Mount Rainier is that it actually DOES what its supposed to, and as I understand it higher quality medias will suffer less packet failure, and the format will map out and not use back sectors so that data isn't lost as frequently.

      There are many people wanting to see Mount Rainier replace the current CD file systems as there are people willing to see the floppy die forever! Once the Floppy is gone and done for, Mount Rainier will replace it and the CD-RW will be the new standard minimum storage medium. This will NOT be a bad thing by far.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  69. Re:profits are leaving the CD-RW market by Aronymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can attest to those Lite-On burners. I got my 52x24x52x for less than $65 including tax and fedex, and it is simply the best CD burner I've ever owned. If you're in the market for an IDE drive, you can't beat the Lite-On 48x or 52x for price/performance. 24x re-write capability sounds great; I just haven't picked up any fast RW disks yet.

    Some items of interest regarding these Lite-Ons (I don't work for them....really):

    - Copy protected software CDs are handled well. Copy-protected audio CDs are not (as expected).
    - Many (if not most or all) Sony, Memorex, and Cendyne IDE CD-RW drives are Lite-Ons that can be flashed to use the Lite-On firmware (to gain Mt. Rainier RW support, for example). They all share the same face plate if they are Lite-Ons - manual eject hole directly above the right side of the volume control. If you can get a good deal on any of them, you will be very happy with it. But Lite-Ons are typically even cheaper than these other brands, including after rebate deals.
    - In Windows, CloneCD loves this drive, and if you buy Lite-On brand, it comes with Nero.
    - Disk eject sounds noisy, but that's because the mechanism is gear-driven, not belt-driven. Disk writing is mostly quiet.
    - It only has a 2MB buffer, whereas other drives have 4MB and 8MB buffers now. Not too bad, especially if your burning software can take advantage of Smart-Burn, like Nero.

    Lite-On seems to be pushing Plextor around these days, especially when IDE Plextors are about $40 more expensive and are not as accurate as the Lite-Ons. I'm not surprised that Yamaha is backing away from this market, when good drives are getting so cheap as to be unprofitable for upscale manufacturers. They will be missed for their super-fast and accurate SCSI RW "tattoo" drives, though.

  70. Tech Geeks Burn by Hand. by medscaper · · Score: 1
    But any tech geek worth his salt knows Plextor is besto

    Any Tech Geek worth his salt burns his OWN CDs with a modified laser pointer, some chewing gum, a lighter, and Duct Tape.

    The good ones don't even need the CD.

    Amateurs.

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  71. Maybe by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they are dropping the production of CD-R/RW disks, not CD-R/RW drives.

  72. Slow and fate by flyondawall · · Score: 1

    It takes about 45 sec to create do a mkisofs and burn a 45 meg image. It takes 6 min's to burn a text around the outside of the cd. The text is so fate you can bearly read it. -Flyondawall

    1. Re:Slow and fate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean faint?

  73. Floppies & CRTs aren't dead by acidrain69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Floppies are commodity items. Yeah, you can buy them for free (AR). Monitors are cheaper than LCD.

    If you do any system administration at all, then you are still using floppies. With a proper boot floppy, you can make OTHER boot floppies. I still don't see and CD boot disks in circulation that can do this quickly and easily.

    CRTs, dead? Whatever. I don't see everyone throwing them out in a rush for LCDs. A few businesses are buying them for cramped quarters (such as front desks), but other than that I don't see them anywhere. None of my gamer friends use them, they don't look as good. Schools can't afford to just drop their investment in CRTs to replace them with the newest thing. Ask any graphic designer with a monitor 21"+ if they want to trade one in for a more expensive, smaller, lower quality LCD.

    Methinks you are a tool of the bleeding edge. Just because new tech comes out, doesn't make the old stuff irrelevant or any less usefull.

    And someone else already covered this, but modems are not going anywhere. Ask anyone with a laptop if they use that modem. Not everyone has access to a network port wherever they go. Wireless may become the standard, but as it's popularity grows, it's available bandwidth per person will shrink.

    I think this is Yamaha's reaction to a commodity market. I have always seen Yamaha's products as overpriced and not necessarily better. Good riddance. Yeah, the image writing drive looked cool, but I try to fill my discs to capacity as a rule. I usually get to within 100 megs of capacity, which doesn't leave much room for images.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    1. Re:Floppies & CRTs aren't dead by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Floppy drives are heading towards obselescence because CD recordable drives are dirt-cheap and DVD recordable drives are also rapidly dropping in price, too. Why store a paltry 1.44 MB of data on a single disk when you can store 650 MB to 4.7 GB of data on a single optical disc?

      As for CRT's, they'll be obselete in due time--new flat-panel display technologies such as field-effect displays (FED's) will finally put CRT's out of business before 2010.

    2. Re:Floppies & CRTs aren't dead by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Floppies have at most 2 years left to them. Some desktops and most notebooks will not have them in the next production year and virtually nothing will have them in the following year.

      CRT have about 5 to 7 years. Most new computer & monitor purchases are with LCDs. In three years there will only be high end CRT produced.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    3. Re:Floppies & CRTs aren't dead by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      Yes, HEADING towards obsolescence. They are not there yet, is my point.

      Sometimes you don't need the 650 megs. Plenty of times I just needed a word document or a powerpoint file flipped over to another machine. Rather than setup shares on a somewhat hostile network, it's easier to just drag it to the floppy. Even email takes longer (usually it was a machine in the next room)

      Sometimes you need to boot off said floppy. This isn't so useful for joe average user, but when you are trying to troubleshoot a machine, there is nothing like a boot floppy with either linux or dos on it.

      It is difficult to make a boot CD that can create other boot CDs. I still don't have one. (not that I've looked lately, but I did a few months ago) Yeah, every machine pretty much now comes standard with a CDR, but in the university and k-12 setting you see a lot of older hardware. Besides, giving students access to a public machine on a univeristy backbone with a CD recorder is asking for trouble :)

      2010? You mean 7 YEARS from now? You give them too much credit.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  74. Misprint by H.G.+Pennypacker · · Score: 1

    The headline should read "Yamaha to Eject From CD-R/RW Business".

    --
    -- HG Pennypacker, wealthy industrialist and philanthropist
  75. Who cares? by Mike+Rucker · · Score: 1

    Who cares if Plextor is the best? I can buy one Lite-On (mine has never burned a coaster either), a second Lite-On for backup (since it's not a Plextor) and I will STILL have $20 left over to buy lunch or something.

  76. This does not surprise me by cdn-programmer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is no money in it. Other companies like Fujitsu also pulled out of part of the industry - IE. IDE hard drives.

    If you look at the HP line of laser printers I think you'll see they cheapened and cheapened them from the Laserjet III to the present models.

    Then look at your consumer PC's and we see the same thing... cheaper and cheaper - but a few years ago they had 5 or more PCI slots - now we see 3 slots - but in a mini tower. haha.

    Power supplies also are compromised.

    How about warrenties on hard drives? The drives we bought 10 years ago would run for 150,000 hours MTBF = 17 years. I have hard drives that have been in use for 17 years. Seriously! I got a pair of maxtor 350 MB ESDI drives that started out in a VAX. They are still running.

    Does anyone think that the drive they buy next year with a 1 year warrenty is going to still be functioning past 2015?

    How about 2010?

    If people want cheap I guess they get cheap. If they want quality I don't know where they need to go. Personally I'd rather pay more and get better quality.

    1. Re:This does not surprise me by amberspry · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When a company as diverse as Yamaha, that sells everything from motorcycles to saxophones, is looking at profit margins. I am sure the rest of their meeting and other meetings are centered around what their core business is and trying to find products/services that both make profit and are still within what Yamaha wants to provide its customers and its shareholders.

      As you say there is no money in hardware. Yamaha has so many other products that offer much better margins, I am sure they are trying to get the most money out of their current businesses as possible. Or, as we just saw they cut them in order to be safe from the looming shareholders. Either way it is truly sad especially when it is a good product but it happens.

      By the way, the quality started going down after the Laserjet 4, not III.

    2. Re:This does not surprise me by shepd · · Score: 1

      >By the way, the quality started going down after the Laserjet 4, not III.

      Okay, lets split hairs =:^) It was after the laserjet 4 Si. The regular LaserJet 4, and 4+ were the start of the "let's replace anything possible with plastic" mentality that's lead to today's HP laser printers that creak when you lean on them and dissassemble like a $40 VCR.

      Just the way I see it...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  77. Image/Text burning on the face by minionman · · Score: 1

    Wasnt it Yamaha who came up with the burner that will burn images and text onto the front side of the cd as well? Innovative idea, too bad it probably wont take off now since its not gonna be produced anymore.

    1. Re:Image/Text burning on the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :-) I don't think so.

      Probably easier to just take a sharp object and pound the label side if you want something that looks great and is a coaster.

  78. My first 1x burner was a Yamaha by old7 · · Score: 1

    I absolutely loved the thing. It cost over $400 and blanks cost $10, but I loved the thing. I can't even imagine how many floppy disks that I didn't have to copy.

    I was writing medical database software and distributing it, originally, on 18 floppies. What a pain that was. I still keep my old SCSI Yamaha 1x burner around, next to my Winchester 10 MB hard drive.

    Old7

    1. Re:My first 1x burner was a Yamaha by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      You sentimental softie. I'm gonna go downstairs now and stare at my Atari serial floppy drive for a while. *sniffle*

  79. last year's tech == next year's graveyard by alphameter · · Score: 1

    ...unless you're the company that has the most important relationship with the customer.

    That's Dell.

    Dell should try DellElectronics.com and get into the home electronics/music stuff...

  80. Yamaha 16x Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a 16x (16-12x CAV) drive in 1999, and in 2000 their damn firmware update ruined it. The worst part is that Yamaha wouldnt honor their own warranty! I will never buy anything of Yamahas EVER again.

  81. I have never had a problem with Yamaha CDRWs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've read the posts that claim many bad experiences with Yamaha CDRWs and Yamaha customer service and I must believe them but that doesn't change the fact that I've never had a single problem with Yamaha CDRWs. I've owned 4 now of varying speeds. I've kept each at least a couple years. The one on my Mac (4x4x16) I've had since early 99 and have never had a problem with them. I for one will be sad to see them go.

    On the other hand I've heard great things about all Plextor's optical drives. I also have Pioneer DVD-ROMs.

  82. So many "geeks" burned by Yamaha!!! Amateurs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...

  83. Re:3rd post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you did it! distance accuracy! flog a dolphin!

  84. Re:profits are leaving the CD-RW market by randmairs · · Score: 1

    HP got out of the CD RW business months ago for this very reason. They decided to concentrate on DVD where there are better margins. I wonder if Yamaha had better margins and stayed the course for a few months more. Real inquiring minds want to know, other minds want to no.

  85. Floppies & CRTs are dead by djupedal · · Score: 1

    I have four computers....two of them are laptops. Only one doesn't have a modem. I travel internationally and I have not fired up a modem in over two years. 802.11b or 10/100 wired everywhere I go.

    I work for one of the largest display manufs. in the world. I know where CRT's are headed, and when. Graphic designers are all over us for our 19 ~ 20" LCDs.
    I use Mac, Linux and NT....every day. I have not touched a floppy in over a year. USB keychain or Compact Flash or CD-R.

    100 megs free? I have over 300gb online...and that's just at home. I burn DVD backups when needed and use mobile trays for my small (10~20gb drives).

    1. Re:Floppies & CRTs are dead by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People who 'travel internationally' are people who generally don't leave big metropolitan districts.

      Sure, there are 'civic planners' hoping to solve the 'sprawl' problem by forcing people to move into high density housing, but many of us are happy to know they're blowing air.

    2. Re:Floppies & CRTs are dead by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      Incorrect.

      First of all, you can't get wireless everywhere, or wired. Hotels? Motels? Cellular? Other countires? Where are you going internationally that you can get this "everywhere you go".

      Of course you think everyone is headed towards 19-20" LCD's, you are dealing with PEOPLE WHO WANT TO BUY THEM! So yeah, it may look that way to you, but on my end I see a lot of people trying to save money, and spending 2x for an LCD isn't in the budget. What do those graphic designers say when they actually compare contrast quality?

      As far as the USB keychain goes, sometime people still use legacy equipment. You should see the stuff the Navy still uses for some research stuff. (I worked at a University where they had some joint things going on) Some stuff doesn't even have USB, and some of the ones that do, don't support booting off it. School notoriously hold onto old equipment. We had everything from 486's up to the newest P4's IN USE, and even older stuff in the warehouse.

      How many machines do you see out there with Compact Flash? What are you smoking? CF isn't NEARLY dispersed enough for any serious IT staff to use it for maintenance purposes.

      Yeah, you can use CDR's, but I go back to my original point: I don't see any good ways to use a boot CDR to make another boot CDR.

      As far as the 100meg/300 gig thing goes, wow, where did you get a 300 gig CDROM? You misunderstand. Re-read what I said, I was talking about the Yamaha CD-Writer that could burn pictures on the unused space. I meant that on a typical CD, I only had MAYBE 100 megs free. Yeah, your dick is bigger than mine, I only have 250 gigs. Troll.

      Besides, DVD burners aren't that popular yet. They are getting there. I give it another year or two. Most games still come on CDR. Most audio devices can't play DVD's yet.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    3. Re:Floppies & CRTs are dead by djupedal · · Score: 1

      You're arguing with yourself. I'm simply reporting what my experience is. If yours is same or not, makes no nevermind to me. I could care less what you and your friends do in study hall.

      The drug remarks/slander are uncalled for, unless you simply want to hump my leg, and in that case, you could try being a bit more direct. I'll still tell you to get off the porch, but at least you'd being making an attempt at keeping your self respect by being honest.

    4. Re:Floppies & CRTs are dead by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      No, I'm arguing with you, and it seems you have given up, because you have not replied to any of my points this time around, and while yes, I did insult you, I offered an argument with valid points. You have just offered insults.

      What drug remarks? "What are you smoking" is a legitimate reply to an odd assumption or assertion. You sound a little paranoid, afraid of admitting something? (is that direct enough for you?)

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  86. And make the best damn recorder/rice burners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta love their recorders (woodwind). Gotta love their 70s era rice burners, too. Hmmm, 2-stroke motor oil smoke smell. 250cc and 350cc. Forget their 80s monsters -- death machine on wheels.

  87. Re:profits are leaving the CD-RW market by shepd · · Score: 1

    HP was never really in the CD RW business. And for the time they were, they (for a stretch) used Philips crap drives that blew up faster than the $10 CD-ROM special from the corner computer shop.

    HP is actually not in much business of making computer stuff at all. I would venture to guess that 90% of their computer stuff is OEMed. Just FYI... :-)

    They really (Compaq and HP) are trying their damndest to stop making _anything_, it seems to me. No more calculators, not much scientific equipment, constant attempts to destroy the Alpha processors, etc, etc. Anything you buy from Compaq or HP is a crapshoot. I'd say the only thing you can trust to be consistent is their service, but I'm pretty sure that's farmed out too.

    Oh well...

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  88. Just another player in a saturated market by default+luser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yamaha stepped into the market when Plextor was king, promising to lead the unwashed masses to Partial CAV heaven.

    But Yamaha never really delivered, from a quality standpoint, and once everyone jumped on the Z-CLV bandwagon there was no chance. Today, Lite-On rules the market with cheap reliable CD burners. Anyone who can't beat them has to either move on the DVD recorders, or get out of the market altogether.

    Even Plextor will succumb, soon enough. When you can buy reliable 48x CD writers for $50, even Plextor's cherished name cannot sell their overpriced burners.

    Good riddance. I don't care who makes my floppy drive, I have a feeling in a few years I won't be caring who makes my CD-RW either.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

    1. Re:Just another player in a saturated market by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I do care who makes my floppy drive, because in my experience Teac FDDs are indestructable (second only to ancient Fujitsu FDDs), and all the rest to some degree suck.

      But after all the short lifespans in expensive and highly reviewed Yamahas (see my previous rants, above), I resolved that I'd thereafter consider CDRWs disposable, and look for pricing accordingly. I got a Plextor when they'd just taken a big price drop, and more recently a LiteOn, at a bigger price cut. The Plextor has already lived longer than my Yamahas, and cost half as much.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  89. Disco Darth by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

    Laserdisc CAV had one frame per revolution, you could actually see the structure of a frame in the metal. The best thing about CAV was perfect rock-solid smooth back and forward scan and slow-mo. We used to have endless hours of stoned fun turning light-saber duels into dance routines.

  90. ode to my Yamaha 4416 by Lxy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can you believe that my 4x SCSI Yamaha is worth more on Ebay than the cost of a 48X ATAPI burner? Yamaha did something right :-)

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:ode to my Yamaha 4416 by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      people on ebay tend to pay outrageously for scsi shit, dont ask me why. I sold my plextor 12432 scsi on ebay about 18 months ago and got $150 for it. I turned around and bought a liteon 24x for $80 or so and pocketed the difference. And that liteon 24 was a MUCH better burner to boot. Its currently sitting in my file server cooking tar files : )

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    2. Re:ode to my Yamaha 4416 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Marketing, marketing, marketing. And at one time, the big reviews of SCSI CDRW all raved about Yamaha drives. Of course, they all worked fine for a few months....

      But knowing from firsthand the poor lifespans of those Yamaha SCSI drives, the Ebay suckers will be highly disappointed.

      As someone else notes, Ebayers tend to have an exaggerated affection for SCSI even when it doesn't make sense. At the time I got SCSI to reduce the CDRW's load on an old machine's IDE, but with the newer machines, that's not an issue, so why pay the extra unless you're really short of IDE slots??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:ode to my Yamaha 4416 by Lxy · · Score: 1

      he big reviews of SCSI CDRW all raved about Yamaha drives. Of course, they all worked fine for a few months

      I've had mine since 1998, (paid $300 for it) and it's still working like the day I bought it. I've NEVER EVER burned a coaster with it, IMHO it's a well built drive. I know at least 4 other people who also bought this drive, and they have nothing but good things to say about it. Some, like me, still use theirs on a regular basis.

      So, say what you will about it, but my drive still rocks. That is, until I sell it on Ebay so I can buy a faster IDE :-)

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    4. Re:ode to my Yamaha 4416 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Then yours is the first ... and anomalous.

      But tell me this: is that machine running 24/7, or is it powered on only for limited periods? Because I've also noticed that total powered-on time is the biggest factor in how soon these drives die. In machines that run 24/7, the lifespan is about 9 months. In machines that run only part-time, up to about 24 months.

      I thought my warranty replacement was doing fine too, til I noticed that a bunch of the CDs burned when it was about 6 months old had gone bad (and no, it's not the media -- I use TDK, and other disks from the same batch are fine). Which means the drive had been sick long before it got to the "I refuse to work" stage.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  91. Re:profits are leaving the CD-RW market by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
    They really (Compaq and HP) are trying their damndest to stop making _anything_, it seems to me.

    That's because they know that in the future, inkjet cartridges will account for 100% of all revenue in the computer industry. All other hardware and software will be given away free of charge as promotional material to generate more sales of inkjet ink.

  92. Only 67 min audio CDs max. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    I was seriously contemplating getting their newest [and last] drive, the CRW-F1 as it promised excellent audio CD results [very low jitter, etc.]

    That claim seems to be true, but luckily I did some research and found out that it can burn a maximum of only 67 minutes onto a CD, which is a shame as I have many albums that exceed that duration.

  93. My thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously as it has been said, Yamaha cannot compete with the market. Their product is good, but not spectacular. If you are going to buy an expensive burner most likely Plextor will be the brand of choice. I have a Memorex 2x burner from back when they were 360 bucks. Still works. My Yamaha 4416 died after a year. My Yamaha 2100 which is rated for 16x only burns relaibly at 12x. It's hit or miss with companies products. Some division just dont make the grade. It's like buying sony computers because their TV's are good. Thank god their off the market. You'de probably have better luck with a rebranded cheapie.

    1. Re:My thoughts by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      $360? That's cheap! My 2x Sony Spressa was $800! But.. it did finallyd ie a few months ago. *sigh* Oh well, as much as I like SCSI.. it's just a hassle these days.

  94. Plextor bad, Yamaha good! by hyrdra · · Score: 1

    Thinking (and wanting) the best -- Plextor, of course, I purchased a Plextor PlexWriter 16x12x40 drive, and it has been nothing but problems. The first month I had a CD jammed up inside it. I called Plextor and they said I would have to ship it to them and wait at least 6 weeks. Shipped the unit to them 3-day and got it back almost exactly 6 weeks later, and the very first (not joking here) CD I put in it jammed up again.

    Well now I was pissed, so I opened up the drive myself to see what I could do and found the problem was a bent piece of plastic from the drive tray assembly. Fixed it -- apparently all they had done was remove the jammed CD and verify the drive could open and close, not caring if the problem occured when a CD was inserted.

    Currenly the drive refuses to burn anything but very high quality media at around 8x speed, sometimes 10 but that's risking it. Also the drive tray jams up when ejecting requiring you to push it in.

    Thankfully I bought Yamaha's latest drive and it has worked great. The image capability is nice for buring a circular artist - album to the very end of the CD. Has worked great and they will be missed, whereas I will never buy Plextor again.

    --


    "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
  95. Don't forget their rocking guitars by nosferatu-man · · Score: 1

    The only Yamaha hardware in my house are two SG-2000 and one SA-2100 guitars. They rock. The 2000s, in particular, are total monsters of rock Wall Of Distortion Marc Bolan T-Rex Bowie machines. The best Japanese guitars ever made.

    'jfb

    --
    To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
    1. Re:Don't forget their rocking guitars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RBX-765A 5-String Bass. It's awesome.

      Plus, Myung, Sheehan and Pattitucci's signature basses are Yamahas.

      - DRFSR

  96. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lexx, destroy that post for me.

    Thanks.

    - Stan

  97. Re:Burn an Image file to CD? OF course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Top, bottom, what's the difference. Except in BDSM.

  98. MTBF misinterpretation by David+Jao · · Score: 2, Informative
    I fully agree with your general point, but your interpretation of MTBF is wrong.

    MTBF is actually the mean time between non-age-related drive failures. For a drive to have a MTBF of 150000 hours means that if you took 150 drives and ran them for 1000 hours each, you would expect one drive failure.

    The MTBF is not intended to indicate how long an individual drive is expected to last before failure -- for that, you need to look up the service life or (for the more cynical among us) the warranty length.

    I hate one year drive warranties as much as you do, but MTBF has nothing to do with it.

  99. Long Live the RD Series! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Those bikes are OK for diesels. But the RD400 Daytona was Yamaha's finest moment.

    Not that it was a match for the king of the two smokers, the Honda NS400.

    As diesels go, I really liked the FZR400.. That thing handled so well it was almost boring to ride fast.

  100. Sure they were great burners... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    ...but I never owned one, because the Plextors cost only about 75% as much as the Yamahas, and performed to within 93+% of them.

    It's a shame they couldn't have cut their prices somehow.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  101. generally, yes...practically, maybe not by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Satellite broadband hopes to show that small town or metropolis, you'll be covered. Those lines you mention keep the planners employed, and that's why they talk about them so often. Once the net comes out of the sky, we can go back to smaller clusters, and not have to follow co-workers into the big city. Either that or we will cover the planet in people, and there won't be any distinction between burg and boomtown.

  102. Codex.lu: Internet Explorer *required* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mier siche Leit fier Drock ze maachen datten déi Kälwer endléch hiere blöden "Internet Explorer required" vun hierem Site weg huelen. Telephon: (+352) 25 31 25. Je méi Leit uruffen, je éischter réagéiert Codex, an maachen hiere Site compatibel!

    1. Re:Codex.lu: Internet Explorer *required* by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Hunn si eng email geschriwwen... Sinn mol gespaant.

  103. Copy protection? by rastos1 · · Score: 1
    I missed the original article about that drive, so I'll ask my question here:

    Could the image serve as copy protection scheme?

  104. Dammit! by mbbac · · Score: 1

    I just ordered a Yamaha CRW-F1ZEM for my new, old Blue & White PowerMac G3 from Mac Connection. Argh. Now what the heck am I supposed to get? Is there another drive out there that has the same high-speeds and Mt. Rainier support? Disc Tattoo was going to be cool as well.

    --

    mbbac

  105. is this news ? by z80 · · Score: 1

    I got the press release from Yamaha about this more than a week ago...

    --
    -- http://z80.org - all opinions, all the time --
  106. Damn!! no more yamaha burners to exchange!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work as Futureshop and I bought one of the Yamaha 24x burners. The thing burnt out on me within half a year. Then I simply went back and got it exchanged for the 44x CRW-F1 under the extended warranty.

    Now Yamaha is going to pull out of the CD-RW business, and I don't know what they will exchange my burner with if this one breaks! HOpefully I'll get a Yamaha DVD-burner if the price is below $300 dollars.

  107. My Yamaha may also have died by SEGV · · Score: 1

    It hasn't been working since I reinstalled my Linux OS a year ago. Every once in a while I try to reconfigure it and test it, but no go.

    It will burn a CD but I can't read it anywhere, and I've tried a dozen or two CD drives. I've tried half a dozen CDRW discs, some good brands.

    Or, I get errors. It will do a test burn but fail a real burn.

    I suppose it could be SCSI or other problems but it was working fine with the previous OS install and I configured it similarly.

    The fan in the CDRW had been squealing and whining, maybe something heated up too much.

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
    1. Re:My Yamaha may also have died by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Congrats, you're experiencing one of the primary symptoms: the CDR looks like it burned just fine until you try to read it. Alternatively, it'll read in any drive except the CDRW itself. It's not just SCSI; the IDE units do it too. I dismangled dead IDE and SCSI Yamahas, and found that internally, they're identical.

      You can string a bit more life out of the Yamaha by only burning when the machine is starting from dead cold, but the disks won't be reliable. When you do this, as a rule it'll burn two disks, but barf on #3.

      BTW mine didn't start having fan troubles til long after they already had other troubles. My first hint that general overheating is the real problem was that the disks come out HOT to the touch (vs. just pleasantly warm from the Plextor and LiteOn units).

      I reported all this, and assorted other observations, in tiresome detail. Tech support's response: "Thanks, good info." (NO, I wanted to hear "Sorry you got 3 lemons, let us replace it for you!")

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  108. Maybe they're obsolete by ecloud · · Score: 1

    Won't people basically be switching to DVD burners pretty soon?

    OTOH I just got an awesome deal on a Yamaha CD-RW on ebay... my old burner died, and I wanted to put off spending the money. I like it; sure is a lot better than my old burner, being SCSI and all.

  109. sweet, thank you all! by haaz · · Score: 1

    'nuff said. :)

    and I know Mike at ResExcellence, so that might work. funny, he's still running the ResExcellence web site on LinuxPPC! :> (yeah, that lame old distro. ;-)

    --
    -- haaz.
  110. T'sch�ngt gehollef ze hun! Bravo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    T'schéngt gehollef ze hun. T'as zwaar nach ëmmer een "optimizé pour Internet Explorer 5" Message do, mee wéinstens gët een awer elo nët méi blockéiert.

  111. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    TIRED of calculating components of vectors? Displacements along direction of
    force getting you down? Well, now there's help. Try amazing "Dot-Product",
    the fast, easy way many professionals have used for years and is now available
    to YOU through this special offer. Three out of five engineering consultants
    recommend "Dot-Product" for their clients who use vector products. Mr.
    Gumbinowitz, mechanical engineer, in a hidden-camera interview...
    "Dot-Product really works! Calculating Z-axis force components has
    never been easier."
    Yes, you too can take advantage of the amazing properties of Dot-Product. Use
    it to calculate forces, velocities, displacements, and virtually any vector
    components. How much would you pay for it? But wait, it also calculates the
    work done in Joules, Ergs, and, yes, even BTU's. Divide Dot-Product by the
    magnitude of the vectors and it becomes an instant angle calculator! Now, how
    much would you pay? All this can be yours for the low, low price of $19.95!!
    But that's not all! If you order before midnight, you'll also get "Famous
    Numbers of Famous People" as a bonus gift, absolutely free! Yes, you'll get
    Avogadro's number, Planck's, Euler's, Boltzmann's, and many, many, more!!
    Call 1-800-DOT-6000. Operators are standing by. That number again...
    1-800-DOT-6000. Supplies are limited, so act now. This offer is not
    available through stores and is void where prohibited by law.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...