Slashdot Mirror


FTC Moves up "Do Not Call" List Registration

tbase writes "AdAge.com has an article about the new FTC "Do-Not-Call" List which will be opening for registrations earlier than previously announced. The FTC Press Release says online registration will be available "on or around July 1." and that "Companies will face an $11,000 fine for each telemarketing call that violates the FTC's new consumer-protection provisions.""

474 comments

  1. How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    $11,000 per spam would be nice for me. I'd quit my job and just post my email address all over the intarweb.

    1. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine. Payable to your government, jackass.

    2. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of "quit my job" don't you understand? Welfare, baby!

    3. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get welfare whether or not there is a fine for unwanted calls, jackass.

    4. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1337

    5. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Rai · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd prefer a no-spam list over a no-call list. I can always waste the telemarketer's time (let them go thru their entire pitch and then say something like "What's that? Could you speak up a little?") and cost the telemarketing company money. As I've said before, if enough people did this, there would be no need for a do-not-call list.

      Spam, however, offers little or no means of retaliation. So I just start praying...

      "Merciful Lord, look down upon your humble servant and strike down the heathen company which seeks to increase the size of my privates and undo your good work. Rain tumors and boils upon them and cause their Exchange servers to crash."

    6. Re:How about a do not spam list? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like a good plan.

      1. Sue and get paid $11,000 USD
      2. Pay out $15,000 USD in legal fees
      3. ???
      4. Profit

      You have to love the US legal system!

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    7. Re:How about a do not spam list? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      As I've said before, if enough people did this, there would be no need for a do-not-call list.

      i have better things to do...i'd rather they just not call to begin with.

    8. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Your time playing solitaire is more valueable than a telemarketer's time. In the ten minutes or even an hour you waste with them, chances are they haven't missed out on a SINGLE sale. And trying to "get them" by being clever? No matter what you think of, someone's done something better than you. Jackass.

    9. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1337

    10. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Drachemorder · · Score: 2, Informative
      "I can always waste the telemarketer's time (let them go thru their entire pitch and then say something like "What's that? Could you speak up a little?") and cost the telemarketing company money."

      I save the time. I just put the phone down and let them talk to empty air, and then eventually hang up the phone when it starts making the "Hey stupid, you left your phone off the hook" sound.

    11. Re:How about a do not spam list? by jonadab · · Score: 3, Funny

      > i have better things to do...

      I prefer to just say something along the lines of "can you explain
      that in detail?" and then gently set the phone down on the counter
      and go do something else for a while.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    12. Re:How about a do not spam list? by jonadab · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is why you start a class action suit. If you can get a few
      hundred thousand people to go in on it, the $11000 per call starts
      to sound like real money, enough to pay some legal fees almost.
      Then your lawyers agree to settle out of court, take their cut,
      and leave you with $1.50 for each plaintiff, which still isn't
      much, but it's a positive number.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    13. Re:How about a do not spam list? by wannasleep · · Score: 1

      In california you can alredy pre-register for free at here

    14. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if there are a lot of fines, government has more money for welfare.

    15. Re:How about a do not spam list? by TCaptain · · Score: 2, Funny

      better yet, just say "Yes, I'm VERY interested...can you hold one sec?" and hit the hold button.

      One telemarketter stayed on hold for 15 mins. Called back twice and stayed on hold again 15 mins each time.

      --
      "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
    16. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1
      I can always waste the telemarketer's time (let them go thru their entire pitch and then say something like "What's that? Could you speak up a little?") and cost the telemarketing company money.

      As much as I would enjoy that remember that the person doing the talking isn't actually the 'telemarketer or survey reader' The person actually talking to you is just some poor schmuck in Arizona or Delaware making $6.50/hr so he can pay the rent while he goes to Community College. He hates his job as much as you hate listening to him.

      We need to direct our ire at those who are profiting from this, not the working man who is unfortunately the public face of telemarketing.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    17. Re:How about a do not spam list? by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      You will fail anyway.

      Action plan:

      1. Found a company on the Cayman Islands.
      2. Buy some call origination in the US and a voice over IP trunk to your call droid center located in India.
      3. Telemarket as much as you like. All they can do is force your telco to close your lines. You are out of FTC jurisdiction.

      All familiarity with existing chinese SPAM is only superficial ;-)

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    18. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Rai · · Score: 1

      The person actually talking to you is just some poor schmuck in Arizona or Delaware making $6.50/hr

      We need to direct our ire at those who are profiting from this

      ?

      Sorry, I missed your point, but you realize that corrupt politicians, greedy corporate criminals, and mafia hitmen are just trying to pay the rent too. Oh well...

    19. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The person actually talking to you is just some poor schmuck

      Choices and consequences, choices and consequences. Telemarketers are not popular! If no one would take the job, the world would be a little bit better.

      We need to direct our ire at those who are profiting from this

      But there is no way to contact them.

    20. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      Do you really think the guy working the phones for $6.50 is profiting? Is the fry cook the one profiting at Macdonalds?

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    21. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can always waste the telemarketer's time (let them go thru their entire pitch and then say something like "What's that? Could you speak up a little?")

      You can also try this

    22. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Rai · · Score: 1

      Unless it costs him more to work there than what he is paid, yes.

    23. Re:How about a do not spam list? by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      Obviously, you've never been called by an automated voice telemarketing system. What do you do when it's a recording. Do you wait on the line, press all the buttons they ask you to press, so you can waste the time of the telemarketer when you *finally* get to reach him/her.

      And what do you when it's simply just an automated dialer. With automated dialers, it means they call you and if you happen to pick up, you get put into a queue and you have to wait until the telemarketer talks to you. This way, the telemarketer in question doesn't waste anytime waiting for the phone to ring. And if the telemarketer doesn't have the time to speak to you, you're left hanging on the phone until their machine hangs up on you and you have no idea who was on the other line because their machine didn't say anything.

      Sometimes, I pick up dozens of dud calls the same day, my caller id shows the same thing unknown name and unknown number, and then when I finally get connected, I find out it was only a telemarketer trying to reach me all those times.

      Granted, my case is a bit special, my mother is visiting me from my home country and she is so naive about those things, she littered the entire internet with my contact info looking for special deals on travel. But still, this really pisses me off.

    24. Re:How about a do not spam list? by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1

      Thank you Captain Literal.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    25. Re:How about a do not spam list? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > cause their Exchange servers to crash.

      You don't need to pray for that to happen, just wait a few days.

    26. Re:How about a do not spam list? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I prefer to just say something along the lines of "can you explain
      that in detail?" and then gently set the phone down on the counter
      and go do something else for a while.


      I'd rather not have what i was doing interrupted to go answer the phone and do that...ever in the middle of thinking through a programming problem? Ever have anyone interupt you, and you lose your train of thought?

  2. Do-Not-Mail by Manic+Ken · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I sign up on the Do-Not-Mail list?

    1. Re:Do-Not-Mail by SkArcher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh, we all wish - unfortuanately, because e-mail is exactly the same accross borders, most e-mail spam could be sent from outside your country and would not have to comply

      What I would like to know is if it is possible to have your snail-mail address put on a no bulk mail list. I have enough coasters already thank you AOL.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    2. Re:Do-Not-Mail by missing000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes.

      It will cost you 5$ however.
      Next time, google.

    3. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Manic+Ken · · Score: 2, Funny

      I tell you what, I was hoping to get a positive mod a la funny.

    4. Re:Do-Not-Mail by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      try not going to the mail box. i don't think it's required to take your mail from the mail box.

      oh, i see. you only want mail that you've authorized, eh? and wal-mart only wants people in the door who will buy some crap too. perhaps they should have you leave a non refundable "deposit" at the door?

    5. Re:Do-Not-Mail by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Funny

      We need to get the UN to enact anti-spam resolutions! They can send inspectors in to verify that all ISP's are complying even! I hear that Hans Blix is looking for work...

    6. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Manic+Ken · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dont know what to say.....it's so stupid.
      I dont want spam and neither does most people I know!

    7. Re:Do-Not-Mail by snoopdug · · Score: 1

      I am not sure if that will work. It will only stop companies from mailing you if they are part of the dma network.

      So, how many companies do you think are part of the dma network?

    8. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you can Stop Bulk snail-mail for free. Go here for details
      http://www.newdream.org/junkmail/step1.ht ml

    9. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Manic+Ken · · Score: 1

      The headline says FTC Moves up
      Now, any bozo could set up an "Do-Not-Mail" list but the key here is :
      Companies will face an $11,000 fine for each telemarketing call
      My explicit question is: Will there be a fine for those companies who violates the list You referred to(dmaconsumers(slashdotted)).
      Yours,

    10. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 4, Informative

      It only costs $5 to submit it online. If you hit the "Register by Mail" button you can print out the form and mail it in for the cost of a stamp and envelope.

    11. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No good. Only folks who subscribe to and honor DMA's e-mail marketing rules would not send you mail.

      This will not stop the rest of the uncaring maggot spammers

    12. Re:Do-Not-Mail by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah, if it were'nt a profitable business then it wouldn't exist.

      capitalism does work in practice if left to work. this freaking governement interference in the market just wacks everything up and gives the public the impression that the gov't does really do something for them while raping all other rights and freedoms outlined in the constiution.

      guess what, if you don't give people a channel to contact you, they won't. go home and stay inside. stay off the internet and don't get the mail. disconnect your phone and get rid of the cable tv. hell dig a hole in the ground and crawl inside. it's your land you s/b free to do that. people won't come knocking on the entrance of your underground hole to "bother" you or steal your precious resources.

      no, i don't like spam either, but people are going to contact you however you expose your self for contact. email, annoying phone calls, door visits, time share sharks while on vacations. they're all after you and your precious dollar and everything you do to thwart them away will make them find another way to come after your precious dollar.

      when it's a p2p network it's ok to allow unregulated use, some of which might be ok, some might not. when it's a phone network, or an email communication channel, we want to the gov't to protect our rights all to hell? if you don't want spam; don't use email.

    13. Re:Do-Not-Mail by GreyOrange · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So direct marketing asocciation gets all this money to sell my mail address, then asks for five more dollars to remove it...that makes sense?

      --

      Insert Witty Remark Here ===>____________________________
    14. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      Will there be a fine for those companies who violates the list You referred to(dmaconsumers(slashdotted))
      Good God - someone who talks in LISP!
    15. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      guess what, if you don't give people a channel to contact you, they won't. go home and stay inside. stay off the internet and don't get the mail. disconnect your phone and get rid of the cable tv. hell dig a hole in the ground and crawl inside. it's your land you s/b free to do that. people won't come knocking on the entrance of your underground hole to "bother" you or steal your precious resources.
      Have you ever heard the expression "throwing the baby out with the bathwater"? Do you know what it means?
    16. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most of the big junk mailers are members, as this is their advocacy group. Though I don't see an unrestricted member list, this page tells us:

      The DMA membership roster includes companies like AT&T, IBM, AOL Time Warner, Mellon Bank, Microsoft, Home Shopping Network, The New York Times, Rapp Collins, Prudential Insurance, Phillip Morris, Proctor & Gamble, as well as R.R. Donnelley, Acxiom, Experian and DoubleClick.

      I would be very surprised if the volume of junk mail from large national direct mailers did not decrease noticably a few months after you added your address to the list. You probably will not see a noticable decrease in mail from local merchants and organizations, as these guys are a lot less likely to be able to justify the $1075 annual membership dues.

    17. Re:Do-Not-Mail by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      it's of german heritage and in general means:

      "by trying to rid themselves of a bad thing succeed in destroying whatever good there was as well"

    18. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Abalamahalamatandra · · Score: 1

      It will always be a profitable business, because it costs basically nothing to send millions of emails out - if you sell one penis pump for $29.95, you've made profit!

      So, in this case:

      1. Pump out a billion spams
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

    19. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats great! You should email that to everyone, I'm sure they'd be interested in knowing about it!

    20. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Then, after the UN does jack-shit for 12 years (besides taking payola from the spammers) we can send in the Marines to kill them.

    21. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      no, i don't like spam either, but people are going to contact you however you expose your self

      Got it. So it's perfectly fine with you if I market my insomnia cure by standing outside your house at 3 am with a bullhorn capable of producing heavy metal concert volume levels. After all, I'm in the public street. I have a right to free speech. And you MIGHT need an insomnia cure.

    22. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See how it applies to your silly idea?

    23. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Zemran · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not just send GBII an anonymous letter saying that all Spammers are really agents of Al Qaeda and wait for the war?

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    24. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't bother talking to this guy. He's really not the swiftest duck in the pond.

    25. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 4, Funny

      hell dig a hole in the ground and crawl inside. it's your land you s/b free to do that. people won't come knocking on the entrance of your underground hole to "bother" you or steal your precious resources.

      I dunno, man. Those Jehova's Witnesses are pretty persistent.

    26. Re:Do-Not-Mail by acidrain69 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      capitalism does work in practice if left to work. this freaking governement interference in the market just wacks everything up and gives the public the impression that the gov't does really do something for them while raping all other rights and freedoms outlined in the constiution.
      You had barely started talking and already your point falls apart. Monopoly practices? Indentured Servitude? Anti-union practices? Environmental laws? These are all things that are in place because of government.
      guess what, if you don't give people a channel to contact you, they won't. go home and stay inside. stay off the internet and don't get the mail. disconnect your phone and get rid of the cable tv. hell dig a hole in the ground and crawl inside. it's your land you s/b free to do that. people won't come knocking on the entrance of your underground hole to "bother" you or steal your precious resources.

      no, i don't like spam either, but people are going to contact you however you expose your self for contact. email, annoying phone calls, door visits, time share sharks while on vacations. they're all after you and your precious dollar and everything you do to thwart them away will make them find another way to come after your precious dollar.
      I don't pay $35 a month for phone service so I can have a way for people to spam me acoustically. I don't pay $60 for net service so I can get even MORE advertisements for penis enlarging. It's like going in to a store to browse. Maybe I don't want to buy anything, or I'm looking for something specific that they don't have. I don't continuously walk IN and OUT of the store browsing, I do it ONCE and leave. I don't need 50 emails for home mortgages or penis enlarging, or 20 emails for the SAME DAMN PORN SITE, in the SAME DAMN LAYOUT. They could at LEAST try to change the format of the email the next time around.
      when it's a p2p network it's ok to allow unregulated use, some of which might be ok, some might not. when it's a phone network, or an email communication channel, we want to the gov't to protect our rights all to hell? if you don't want spam; don't use email.
      Since when did I agree to be a marketting target? It would be one thing if remove-me-from-further-emails links actually WORKED, because I would just remove myself.
      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    27. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yeah, if it were'nt a profitable business then it wouldn't exist.

      I think is it a profitable business, mostly for the people selling spam services to other companies.

      However, it does not have to be profitable to exist. If Billy-Bob Ray gets a bunch of spam, he'll figure "hey I could do this too - it must be profitable since I get so much spam." Billy-Bob Ray sends out a million emails and gets his email account closed (which he was about to lose because he was behind on the the payment anyway). No profit, but there are two others who decide "hey, if Billy-Bob Ray can do it, so can I!"

    28. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! E-mail of mass destruction!

    29. Re:Do-Not-Mail by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      I don't pay $35 a month for phone service ... I don't pay $60 for net service

      these are the people you need to contact to get rid of your phone/email spam problems. why does your phone company sell your phone number, why do your credit card companies sell your telephone number? why does microcenter ask for my phone number for each purchase? does your isp sell your email address? aol does. mine doesn't.

      how does my point fall apart? i don't claim that other non-consitutional laws are a good thing for our society. most of those laws you point to stem from protecting valid constitutional rights. environmental laws are to protect the natural resources of the socitey. this socitey has said that it doesn't like businesses dumping tons of waste chicken manure into their water supply which would cause massive disease. the government is aloud and has an absolute responsibilty to protect the common resources of its citizens; be that air, water, forests, animals, etc.

      Since when did I agree to be a marketting target?

      the moment you came out of the womb you most likely became a part of our massive marketing society. the moment you started to watch semame street, barney or what ever else you parents put on the tube to shut up that damn crying baby (trust me, those shows certainly come in handy quite often).

      find a phone company who promises to NEVER disclose your number. a company who's numbers can not be randomly generated. protect that number by giving it only to people you know. you probably won't get phone solicits. find an email provider that can protect your email address. never disclose that address except to people you want email from. you'll cut your spam down. current phone/email systems are inherantly flawed in that anyone can randomly send phone calls/spam to not a list, but a generated list of possible address/numbers.

      how about encrypted phone numbers that you have to give out a key for someone else to install on their phone to be able to call your phone? your phone will reject calls that don't provide your "public" key. add on top of that a way to randomly change your public key and update your "friends" phones with your new key.

      i don't like spam, but this is not governement terrotory. their job is to protect the borders and to protect the rights of the citizens. no human rights have been violated.

    30. Re:Do-Not-Mail by maxpublic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that:

      - it's my phone and I'm paying for the service. With that in mind it's perfectly reasonable to assume that I get to decide who gets to call. If I tell someone to fuck off, then they better damn well fuck off.

      - it's my email and my internet access. I get to decide to can send me mail using the services *I* pay for. In a capitalist society this is a perfectly reasonable expectation. Only a communist motherfucker would insist that I give everyone equal time on *my* dime.

      - it's my mailbox and it's my postal service. The postal service does not belong to spammers, nor do I have any recognizable alternative to said post office. One would think, given no alternatives other than the government agency that I supposedly control as a citizen of the United States, I could dictate an end to spam. Funny, I can't.
      And, by the way, you are *required* to have a receptacle on your property for mail delivery. This is a *law*. Funny thing, that.

      - most of all, it's *my* time. Neither you nor anyone else has any business wasting it unless you're willing to pay whatever fee I set. This too is good capitalism; in fact, excellent capitalism.

      Unfortunately for all of us, capitalism has very little to do with 21st century America. It had little to do with America prior to the 21st century, but even less so now. If we lived in a truly capitalist society I'd actually have the rights I listed above, as a logical extension of the free market. If anything, I'd have even more rights, provided by the tooth-and-nail competition of competing services all tripping over themselves to steal away customers, with the elimination of harrassment by low-life scumbags as a selling point for those services.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    31. Re:Do-Not-Mail by autechre · · Score: 1

      I don't care if they can make enough of a profit off of calling other people to continue calling me. Honestly, I don't spend my money in the same way as most other people, so I don't see how the profitability of the company and their ability to invade my day with advertising are related.

      Just because I think that the clothes, food, music, etc. that other people buy every day in this country are terrible does not mean that the majority will stop buying them. Therefore, companies whose products do not interest me can continue to be profitable, and I can do nothing about it. But you are suggesting that nothing should stop them from advertising to me.

      This is why companies are required to maintain their own "no call" list in the U.S., and required to put you on it for 10 years when you ask. All that is new here is making it more convenient for me to tell everyone "NO" all at once. I don't want my guitar playing interrupted by someone trying to sell me the New York Times. If I want to buy something, I take the time to look for options on my own, and usually get things on the recommendations of friends.

      Commercial breaks on TV are time for situps, or switching to Cartoon Network for a few minutes. Spam is filtered. Those who knock on my door never succeed. Really, I would be doing these companies a favor by telling them not to bother with me, and increasing their profits rather than decreasing them.

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    32. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Salo2112 · · Score: 1

      Alas, poor Hans let Iraq develop its nuclear weapons program right under his nose the first time he was in charge of non-proliferation over there. Helen Keller would be a better choice.

    33. Re:Do-Not-Mail by mark_lybarger · · Score: 0, Troll

      - it's my phone and I'm paying for the service. With that in mind it's perfectly reasonable to assume that I get to decide who gets to call. If I tell someone to fuck off, then they better damn well fuck off.

      again, i say sure it's your phone, but why the hell are you buying a phone and service for said phone that runs on an inheriantly flawed system. GET A PHONE THAT DOESN'T ALLOW SPAM! the same for your email! you mean they're not out there? sounds like a good business opportunity. until the next method for mass marketing comes along.

      i'm curious; where's that law requiring property owners to have a mail box on every property we own? i know of lots of small cities where the mail isn't delivered, but everyone has a box in the downtown office.

    34. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most likely, the point was that it's not the business of the government to regulate any of this.

    35. Re:Do-Not-Mail by clare-ents · · Score: 1

      "
      find a phone company who promises to NEVER disclose your number. a company who's numbers can not be randomly generated.
      "

      Or alternatively register with the Telephone Protection Service and never receive a junk phone call again which is considerably easier. Guess it sucks to live in the UK where we have strong data protection laws for this kind of thing.

      PS Can you name a telephone company that sells numbers that can't be randomly generated.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    36. Re:Do-Not-Mail by arose · · Score: 1

      Nasty hobbitses stole my precioussss from my underground hole.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    37. Re:Do-Not-Mail by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      GET A PHONE THAT DOESN'T ALLOW SPAM!

      You're an idiot, troll, or both. There is not such thing.

      sounds like a good business opportunity. until the next method for mass marketing comes along.

      The telephone network is a public resource..just like your forests and parks. Think its not? Check how hard it is for a telco to actually be able to deny someone service. Even if you have no phone service to your house, they must provide a line that can dial 911.

      Besides...someone that pays for their land can dictate who may come up the drive. Why can't someone paying for phone service dictate who may call them?

      i'm curious; where's that law requiring property owners to have a mail box on every property we own? i know of lots of small cities where the mail isn't delivered, but everyone has a box in the downtown office.

      You're required to have that box to i believe.

    38. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You will be able to register for free online or by calling a toll-free number."

      Next time, dig a little deeper.

    39. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Drachemorder · · Score: 3, Funny
      "Those Jehova's Witnesses are pretty persistent."

      You can get rid of them, too. Just draw a chalk outline of a body outside your door/cave/whatever, and scatter some JW pamphlets around. Then you can sleep all day if you want to.

    40. Re:Do-Not-Mail by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      GET A PHONE THAT DOESN'T ALLOW SPAM!

      Already have. I disconnected my land line and got a cell service instead. It's illegal to make a sales call to a cell service because the caller has to pay for the call; it isn't illegal to make a sales call to a land line because, through bizarre contortions of the law, you're assumed to be 'inviting' these calls, unless you specifically request otherwise, - *even though you're still paying for the goddamned service*.

      You'll note that in neither case is the free market at work. In fact, whether land line or cell the free market is pretty much fucked (although less so with the cell). In an actual free market I'd be able to program in a 'white list' of numbers and automatically reject all other calls, or forward them to voicemail. It would be *my choice and my choice alone* which would determine who could and could not call me, through the simple expediency of programming a white list (or providing one to the supplier). As is, I have to rely on the damned law to do the job that the market would otherwise do.

      Regardless, no human being has the right to bother me - to waste my time without paying me for it - unless I specifically grant them that right. *That's capitalism, pure and simple*. Spammers, whether they be the scumbags that run telemarketing, email, or snail mail operations, are the antithesis of the free market: they demand my time, whether I wish to provide it or not, and refuse to pay me for it.

      Sounds like they're a bunch of fucking communists, if you ask me. Communists and con men all wrapped up into the same package. But isn't that redundant?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    41. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Yeah, and if your house is burgled, then it's your fault because your door lock was "an inherently flawed system".

      Under a free market system, enforcement of private property rights is not improper government interference in the system -- it is perfectly proper government maintenance of the system.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    42. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      why does your phone company sell your phone number, why do your credit card companies sell your telephone number

      Because they've been allowed to get away with stealing it. This does not imply that condoning theft is part of the free market system, but rather that the government has neglected its responsibility as night watchman.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    43. Re:Do-Not-Mail by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      no human being has the right to bother me - to waste my time without paying me for it

      i have a right to ask you what time it is if i see you walking down the street. that's wasting your time. you have the right to ignore me or listen to me and to even tell me the time or to tell me to fuck off. regardless, i've still wasted your time and you'll be goddamned if you'll ever see a freaking dime from me.

      yeah, it's all a red commie coverup. always is.

    44. Re:Do-Not-Mail by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Funny

      tell me the time or to tell me to fuck off

      It's 12:45 p.m. And fuck off, already.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    45. Re:Do-Not-Mail by thinkninja · · Score: 1

      When you buy penis enlargement pills, you're supporting TERRORISM!

      --
      "The number of Unix installations has grown to ten, with more expected." (Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd ed.; june 1972)
    46. Re:Do-Not-Mail by skarmor · · Score: 1

      - it's my phone and I'm paying for the service. With that in mind it's perfectly reasonable to assume that I get to decide who gets to call. If I tell someone to fuck off, then they better damn well fuck off.

      That's just wrong. You don't seem to understand the concept of the phone system. The phone is yours. You pay for the service. The service allows any other subscriber to this service to contact you. Likewise you can contact any other subscriber to the service. This is not at your discretion despite what you may think.

      - it's my email and my internet access. I get to decide to can send me mail using the services *I* pay for. In a capitalist society this is a perfectly reasonable expectation. Only a communist motherfucker would insist that I give everyone equal time on *my* dime.

      Once again you fail to understand. You pay for email service. This service allows you to send and receive messages. The content and sender of the messages is restricted only to others who subscribe to the service.

      - it's my mailbox and it's my postal service. The postal service does not belong to spammers, nor do I have any recognizable alternative to said post office. One would think, given no alternatives other than the government agency that I supposedly control as a citizen of the United States, I could dictate an end to spam. Funny, I can't.

      The postal service does not belong to you either. Its the same as above, you pay for the service. This service allows you to send and receive messages. That is all. It does not mean that you can send and receive messages to/from only a specific group of people.
      You cannot dictate an end to spam because it is a legitimate business. The freedom of commercial speech should not be restricted just because it annoys you personally.

    47. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, but telemarketers abuse common manners. If you walked around town asking everyone you saw what time it was, you'd be tolerated, then avoided, and finally locked up. Don't believe me? Try it this weekend in a busy area and report back.

    48. Re:Do-Not-Mail by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      It only costs $5 to submit it online. If you hit the "Register by Mail" button you can print out the form and mail it in for the cost of a stamp and envelope.

      This kind of shit kills me. Are they trying to tell us it's somehow cheaper for them to get a paper letter, open it, and key in information rather than appending to a database every so often filled up by people submitting web forms?

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    49. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 1

      Nah. They do it to discourage people from actually joining the list. This way they can point to the existence of the list as evidence that they are consumer-friendly while significantly reducing the number of people who will actually join the list. The $5.00 fee probably provides about the same level of disincentive as the inconvenience of printing and mailing the form.

    50. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A duck's success in a pond isn't related to its speed, dumbass.

      A duck's success would be better measured by something like how water-repellant it's feathers are, or how efficient its beak is, fuckwad.

      Evidently you aren't the most-effiently beaked duck in the pond.

    51. Re:Do-Not-Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " And, by the way, you are *required* to have a receptacle on your property for mail delivery. This is a *law*. Funny thing, that."

      not here, in MN that is. you do not have to have a mailbox on your property.

    52. Re:Do-Not-Mail by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I don't pay $35 a month for phone service so I can have a way for people to spam me acoustically. I don't pay $60 for net service so I can get even MORE advertisements for penis enlarging ... I don't pay $40 a month to Comcast to see advertisements on my Television! Oh, wait, I do.

      I totally agree with your feeling, but your reasoning needs a little work.

    53. Re:Do-Not-Mail by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > In an actual free market I'd be able to program in a 'white list' of numbers and automatically reject all other calls

      I still claim it's a free market -- all you have to do is set up your PC (running Linux, of course ;) at the incoming point of your phone line and, using caller ID, pick up the line & hang up if it's not on your PC 'white list.' Problem solved, free market reintroduced.

    54. Re:Do-Not-Mail by acidrain69 · · Score: 1
      these are the people you need to contact to get rid of your phone/email spam problems. why does your phone company sell your phone number, why do your credit card companies sell your telephone number? why does microcenter ask for my phone number for each purchase? does your isp sell your email address? aol does. mine doesn't.
      As far as the phone goes, teh government is finally doing something about it on a national scale. I don't have a credit card anymore. As far as stores asking for mailing info, I decline that whenever possible. I don't know wether adelphia sells my email address, I don't use the acct that came with the service. I know my university acct doesn't sell my email, they have enough internal spam to send me, and people who are in the system still manage to log into the shell and leech directory listings.
      how does my point fall apart? i don't claim that other non-consitutional laws are a good thing for our society. most of those laws you point to stem from protecting valid constitutional rights
      By saying that capitalism works if left to itself. Harassment is illegal. If I want to be removed from a mailing list, and said entity manages to spam me some more, that is harassment.
      the moment you came out of the womb you most likely became a part of our massive marketing society. the moment you started to watch semame street, barney or what ever else you parents put on the tube to shut up that damn crying baby (trust me, those shows certainly come in handy quite often).
      I realize I became a part of it, but I never asked for spam in my inbox, in fact, I don't mind the spam, but at least give me a chance to opt-out. For me it was transformers, sessame st and some 80's anime.
      i don't like spam, but this is not governement terrotory. their job is to protect the borders and to protect the rights of the citizens. no human rights have been violated.
      Actually, this is perfect territory for the FTC or FCC. Telemarketters aren't supposed to call you back if you ask to be put on a Do-not-call list, email should work similarly.
      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    55. Re:Do-Not-Mail by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      Harassment is illegal.

      i have no problems with that. it's making specific forms of harassment illegal that i have a problem with. the law makers should define harassment in such a way that it defines all forms of harassment. no need to make laws about each one in particular, and no need to go after people for sending an unsolicited message, go after them for harassment if that fits the bill.

      the trouble with this national dnc list is that there will be a way around it. companies will go outside the borders for their phone solicitation practices. perhaps through untraceable or tough to trace phone systems. the telemarketing doesn't have to be done by the companies directly, but through "affiliates" and such.

  3. In Addition: by Jonsey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also, the US government reccomended that citizens begin using their phone-based registration system: Allowing the government to levy a $11,000 tax on all who wish to be added to the do not call list.

    --
    I assert that my comment is only my opinion, not that of any employer, past, present or future.
  4. If this were for e-mail... by DreadSpoon · · Score: 2, Funny

    The gov't would call us up offering the service, to block telemarketers! /me deletes another "block unwanted spam" message from his INBOX...

    1. Re:If this were for e-mail... by what+happen! · · Score: 0

      'What' is correct...

      --
      Who are you?
  5. Woo Hoo by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looking forward to saving 15 bucks a month getting rid of Privacy Manager and caller ID.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:Woo Hoo by sharkey · · Score: 1
      ...getting rid of Privacy Manager and caller ID

      Gotta keep CallerID. I need to know if it's work calling.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Woo Hoo by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I worked for a market research company. We didn't sell anything but we did call people unwantedly, just like telemarketers. Privacy Manager stopped us from getting through to do the servey. But researchers don't have to follow this new list. If you quit using privacy manager, you will still get calls from researchers and from political activists. By the way, though we didn't sell anything, we often had to ask for address. I am sure whoever commissioned the survey then used that info to try to sell something. Oh well.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  6. 11,000 dollar fine? by huckda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Would be nice if it went directly to the individual(s) they phoned instead of into some politician's pocket.

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    1. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Hell I'll take just $500.00 of that $11,000. you know the "fee" charged by some company that will be involved and yet nobody can fully explain what they do or why they are even a part of the process....

      Like the $8.00 a month for intrastate access fees on your phone bill.. Huh? but I dont call out of the state...

      Or the "gas recovery fee" on your gas bill...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by gwernol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would be nice if it went directly to the individual(s) they phoned instead of into some politician's pocket.

      But that would, sadly, create an enormous incentive for people to make false and misleading accusations against telemarketers in order to get the fine money - which is a significant amount. The last thing you want the legal system doing is encouraging illegal activity...

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
    3. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's the thing. You set up the list. Then you advertise the fact that you have the list. Then you set up a mechanism to have people report violations. Then set up an investigation team to investigate these reports. Hire a bunch of agents to make arrests and provide them with guns and bullet-proof vests. Now hire the lawyer to do the prosecution and all the appeals. Now hire another lawyer to get a garnishment or lien or whatever it takes to collect the money. Then you can have the $11,000.

      I don't have a problem with this law. But only if it pays for itself. I'm not willing to have my taxes go up just so I have a few less hangups on my answering machine.

      Also, $11,000 isn't too bad, but $11,000 per call is just ridiculous.

    4. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by irving47 · · Score: 1

      that would, sadly, create an enormous incentive for people to make false and misleading accusations against telemarketers in order to get the fine money
      false and misleading methods to obtain someone else's money... Some would say turnabout is fair play.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    5. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by swv3752 · · Score: 3

      Personally, I am in favor fees so high that it would bankrupt any company for violating the list.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    6. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I'm not. People make mistakes. This particular one is quite minor.

    7. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      But that would, sadly, create an enormous incentive for people to make false and misleading accusations against telemarketers in order to get the fine money

      By your reasoning, judgments in personal injury cases should go to the state instead of to the victim, because giving the money to the victim creates an incentive to file bogus lawsuits.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    8. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo, you hit my personal favorate. Damages should go to the victim. Punitive awards should go to the state. That would be very fair and it would end stop the cries for lawsuit reform, without letting the corp off free. I don't understand why more people don't see it this way. A lawsuit shouldn't be a million dolar lottery.

    9. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But that would, sadly, create an enormous incentive for people to make false and misleading accusations against telemarketers in order to get the fine money - which is a significant amount.

      I don't see this as so sad. There's a lot more corrupt things going on in our legal system. It's just a fine. People are being executed based on false statements, but that's always offtopic.

      --
      I live in Texas, but I'm not a Cowboy, so don't tell me to slow down in such an insulting way.

    10. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it really is an honest mistake, then the fee can be dropped. This isn't some kind of manditory drug case or anything. If it's a minor mistake, no one will even pursue it. Small fines are just paid and the guitly just continue to do the same.

    11. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to imply that it's an accident. Just that the person doesn't realize how serious the penalties are. I don't think we should go around bankrupting every company or person just for making a few phone calls. That seems excessive to me. Likewise $11,000 per call seems excessive to me. Should we really be charging Joe's Service Shop $11 million just because they called 1000 local residents to inform them of their special price on oil changes? I don't know the specifics of the rule but if I were drafting a law I'd only give such excessive fines to willful infringers.

      As for your speculation that it's not like mandatory drug sentences, the way I read it there is no judicial discretion involved. You make 1000 calls, unless the prosecutor wants to make a deal, you owe $11 million.

    12. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also, $11,000 isn't too bad, but $11,000 per call is just ridiculous

      I think $11,000 per call is just fine to establish a punitive action against these harrassing ruffians who refuse to consider the idea that my dinnertime with family is personally valuable and refuse to go away even when told to bugger off. After considering what the state will have to spend fending off the telemarketer's sleazy shark lawyers who will try the most torturous dissembling to perpetrate the fraud upon the court that the telemarketer has the right to bother me and keep calling me. At $11,000 a call it is the only deterrent to these pests large enough to take those whose time they waste seriously. Perhaps it is not enough. It should be $11,000 + being flogged and pilloried.
    13. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      At $11,000 a call it is the only deterrent to these pests large enough to take those whose time they waste seriously.

      I'd say $10 a call would be equally effective as a deterrent. Either way it's a losing proposition.

      It should be $11,000 + being flogged and pilloried.

      I'd say $10,000 + $1/call.

    14. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      There are all sorts of exceptions to this law. If you are so stupid as to disturb 1000 random people, you deserve to be bankrupted.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    15. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      If you are so stupid as to disturb 1000 random people, you deserve to be bankrupted.

      That is where you and I disagree.

    16. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

      I would be really amazed if Joe decided to take the time to call 1000 people during his dinner time to tell them about oil. Often It seems like a ad in a local magizine works better.

    17. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      No way. You get way more bang for your buck making calls.

      Add in a $10/call fine, and suddenly it's not cost effective.

      As it turns out the law doesn't apply to solely intrastate campaigns, and the $11,000 figure that was quoted is only the maximum. So it turns out to just be shitty reporting by Slashdot, not a shitty rule.

    18. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd say $10,000 + $1/call

      That give incentive to harrass, not deter future calling. I'd setting for $10,000 + a finger for each additional call. That would be a just and humane method.
    19. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That give incentive to harrass, not deter future calling.

      How does a $10,000 fine + $1/call give incentive to harrass?

    20. Re:11,000 dollar fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      once you have paid the initial cost (or have a good team of shark lawyers to run interference for you), the marginal cost of harassing someone into the ground for complaining is minimal.

  7. Stunning by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Funny
    Even if they are following in the footsteps of many state governments, this is an astoundingly good thing. The list here in Indiana has worked remarkably well.

    The only change I'd make would be to forgo the fines in favor of treating telemarketers as "enemy combatants."

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  8. THE SYSTEM MIGHT ACTUALLY WORK! by cjackson0 · · Score: 1

    Here's hoping! Sounds like even though the FCC doesn't listen to shit, this might actually happen. This might me a real step in the right direction of protecting you and me.

    1. Re:THE SYSTEM MIGHT ACTUALLY WORK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FCC != FTC

      FTC = Federal Trade Commission - Created, theoretically, with the consumer in mind. It is supposed to go after the big baddies.

      FCC = Federal Communications Commission - "charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable."

  9. Age of "Don't Bug Me"?? by baloo914 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    we encoutered several evolutionary steps in the last few hundred years. "age of reason", "industrial revolution", etc.

    with the dawn of spam email officially being attacked and now the phone solicitors, are we stumbling upon the "age of stop bugging me" or the "age of leave me alone, I don't need more sexual stamina"??

    1. Re:Age of "Don't Bug Me"?? by Zemran · · Score: 1

      America getting a right to privacy is about as likely as the UK getting the right to shoot school friends.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:Age of "Don't Bug Me"?? by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      It's not that we've suddenly become more desirous of being left alone, it's that the pervasiveness of daily annoyances (spam, telemarketers, flyers on your doorknob, 5 pounds of junkmail a day, etc.) has increased to a breaking point. Socrates didn't get 5 pounds of junkmail and 13 telephone calls and 240 spams a day. Being left alone was taken for granted back then and humanity didn't need such laws to preserve it until now.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    3. Re:Age of "Don't Bug Me"?? by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 1

      Definitely, but this shouldn't really surprise anyone. Just as the industrial revolution led to abuses that in turn resulted in child labor laws and organized labor protection, the information revolution is making possible abuses that eventually (God willing) will result in stronger consumer protection and personal privacy legislation.

  10. DO NOT CALL ME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ever! I HATE PHONE CALLS! ALL OF THEM! especially pesky TELEMARKETERS! THEY ARE THE SUCK! If you call me i will hunt u down. I SWEAR IT! BY THE POWER OF GREY SKULL ILL KICK UR ASS! and dont think cuz i made heman refference i cant kick ur ass. I could totally kick ur ass, even while watching heman and chewing beef jerky.

  11. 11.000 $ for .. by teemu.s · · Score: 2, Funny

    one false call .. you can afford lots telephone sex calls for that ..

  12. Useless by krray · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There HAVE BEEN "Do not call" lists for many years.
    The phone still rings.

    There HAVE BEEN "Do not mail" lists for many years.
    I get more and more junk mail.

    We all know how many "Do not email" lists exists.
    Regardless of action the spam keeps coming.

    How about a "STAY OUT OF MY FACE AND GET A REAL JOB/LIFE" list to cover everything. Damn, my doorbell just rang, I bet somebody wants to witness with me something about their God...

    1. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I bet somebody wants to witness with me something about their God..."

      "Want to talk to me about your God? Go ahead and I'll show you my gun." (text on my friend's door)

    2. Re:Useless by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      yes, the lists will not keep people from buggin' you. how about get out of the freaking house and enjoy some of that limited life?

      i get messages left on my answering machine now telling me that i'm pre-approved for a visa. i really should just quit paying bills so my credit goes to hell. that'll stop the junk mail. or it'll be from a new source (HOW TO CLEAN YOUR CREDIT). i get messages on my machine saying i get a 99$ vacation to disney and kids are free. the messages really don't bother me much. they're left during the day and i just walk away and or can listen to the crap during my leisure. but, when people want to interupt my dinner time. watch out.

    3. Re:Useless by derch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Add a line to your answering machine message telling solicitors to put you on their 'Do Not Call' list. I did it a month ago and the number of calls and messages has gone from four or five a day, sometimes four or five on hour, to one every two or three days.

    4. Re:Useless by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      like i said, the messages on the machine don't really bother me. and i'd rather not have legit people hear me bitching to the solicitors to put me on the dnc list. currently i'm only once every few days though. i suppose it if were 15 per day that i had to sift through it might be a different story.

    5. Re:Useless by skarmor · · Score: 1

      What's so hard about answering the phone, saying "No, Thanks" to a telemarketer, and then hanging up? It takes approximately 10 seconds. If you can't accept that people will use these services for commercial purposes then maybe you shouldn't be using them. If you do stop using them then you will never be bothered again, guaranteed.

    6. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I really like getting up in the middle of [i]24[/i] to talk to some spotty oik with double glazing to sell. When I have to jump out of the shower and get water all over the carpet, I just love the corporation who calls me.

      If you can't accept that people might want a service where cold-calling is not allowed, perhaps you'd better rethink that whole "freedom" thing we have going and how it relates to how I'm allowed to dictate who gets to call me.

    7. Re:Useless by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's really hard to do that in the middle of a game of tactical ops. It can result in getting fragged. some of us actually get important calls as well, so we do answer the phone in such situations.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Useless by flyhmstr · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh yes those buggers
      (answers door)
      Me: What are you selling?
      Annoying Prat (AP): Nothing
      Me: ok...
      AP: Can I talk to you about (insert religion)
      Me: Ok you're selling your religion, bye (shutdoor)

      Really should get the broomstick up where it can be seen from the outside....

      --
      -- The Flying Hamster
    9. Re:Useless by haystor · · Score: 1

      I suppose that could work. But its sooo much more fun to make them hang up. Especially since a lot of them work by the principle that if they keep you on the phone they can make the sale.

      If they are selling some subscription, I tell them I'm moving.
      Me - Who's calling?
      Them - xxx with the Dallas Morning News
      Me - Sorry, I'm moving.
      Them - Well sir, we do offer home delivery outside the Dallas area.
      Me - to South Africa.

      I've found that as long as you can force them into something that they don't have a button for on their screen it can end a call. South Africa is my favorite. Most lackeys wouldn't even know where to start looking to see if their company operates in South Africa. This works great to get the extended warranty people off my back too. I've yet to run into a smart one that switches from the extended warranty to selling me new plugs...that would be impressive.

      Another technique is to ask who they're calling for and tell them that person is dead. But don't just go with dead, make it something unusual. Look to the Darwin awards for ideas.

      I've recently been plagued with "Courtesy Calls". I've found that asking these people if they are telemarketers really puts them on the defensive. They must have instructions to avoid being called that, perhaps it would be an admission that this is not a legitimate call from someone we've done business with but a cold call.

      Me - What's this call concerning?
      Them - This is a courtesy call.
      Me - Are you sure you aren't a telemarketer.
      Them - this is a courtesy call.
      Me - Because you sound like a telemarketer. Are you sure you're not trying to sell me something?
      Them - umm
      Me - You're not very good at this.

      I'm normally a pretty quiet and easy going guy. But these guys drive me nuts so I enjoy making them squirm, which they'll do if you get them out of their element. This is excellent practice dealing with pushy people that are so much better at this sort of thing than I am.

      Me - Who's calling?
      Them - This is Kiwi Services
      Me - I'm sorry, we already have a supplier that meets all our kiwi needs.

      After this call I thought that I could have responded with the line: "Is that kiwi the bird, or kiwi the fruit?" This would work for any company name that might have multiple meanings, but I haven't used it yet. Maybe they'll call back.

      One last one. Put them on "hold" and sing to them. Don't worry if you don't know the words, you can always ask them.

      --
      t
    10. Re:Useless by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Damn, my doorbell just rang, I bet somebody wants to witness with me something about their God...

      you know, if you simply have a black cape by the door for those occasions and answer it "Welcome to my hovel oh friends of the dark overlord!" they usually go away quickly and never come back....

      Hell I keep the neighbor kids out of the yard that way.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Useless by zhrike · · Score: 1

      I signed up for the DNC list in my state (PA) as soon as I could. The calls have all but stopped.
      I used to get a few a day, now once a week is remarkable. Seriously. I was dubious as to the effectiveness of the list, but...

    12. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are freeking hilarious. Did you think of that all by yourself?

    13. Re:Useless by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Maybe they'll call back.

      They will. I used to get their name/number on my caller ID all the time.

      Then I signed up at http://www.texasnocall.com/. The telemarketing calls have gone to near zero, and I've filed complaints with the PUC for the ones I did receive.

      Scared the hell out of an insurance agent, who sent me a written apology and told the PUC he was going to stop making automated telemarketing calls altogether, because he couldn't figure out how to make the machine skip over numbers on the no-call list.

      (Note: this is for Texas residents. I recognized the companies mentioned in the parent posting, and thought he would find it helpful)

    14. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your idea of "freedom" is to tell people when and to whom they can make phone calls, then you are very backwards.

      On the other hand, you always have the freedom to look at the caller id and not answer the phone...

    15. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they usually go away quickly and never come back....

      I'd imagine they would hurry away so they don't laugh in your face- they do want to remain professional, after all. The sight of a sweaty, pasty-white, pear-shaped virgin loser trying to act menacing is enough to make anybody lose their composure.

    16. Re:Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really hard to do that in the middle of a game of tactical ops.

      It's also really hard to lose your virginity when you spend all of your time playing tactical ops.

    17. Re:Useless by Daniel_ · · Score: 1
      Actually, I signed up for the dma's no call list and it has been ~90% effective in blocking telemarketing calls. Those remaining are either non-profit or outright scams (or both :-)). Of course, that was before they put in a $5 fee for the service...

      Most legit buisnesses will respect the lists. Those who make the effort to be removed aren't likely to buy products so they're not cost effective to call anyways- even if there is no penalty.

      Ironically, this actually *increases* the amount of telemarketing. The average expense per sale will drop since those who would never buy over the phone have been eliminated from the calling lists, making telemarketing more attractive...

      --
      The number you have dialed is imaginary, please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
    18. Re:Useless by FrEaK7782 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The hard part is when you attempt to be polite. If you aren't rude and hang up on them, they take that as a "Ya! Send me a bunch of shit for $100's". I was polite to one guy. He didn't even ask if I was interested. Because I hadn't hung up on him he started putting my information in to the computer to send some "free" trial.

      If the telemarketers acted like decent human beings and followed some phone etiquette, a simple "No thanks" would work. But most of them don't accept that. They keep going "but why don't you want it? it's free!". Bastards...

    19. Re:Useless by skarmor · · Score: 1

      I agree that telemarketers can be complete assholes. But, you can just hang up on them once you say "No Thanks". There is no need to listen to their pathetic attempts to keep you on the line.

    20. Re:Useless by skarmor · · Score: 1

      That's the spirit! Telemarketers can be an endless source of amusement if you feel like screwing with them...

    21. Re:Useless by skarmor · · Score: 1

      Well, in this case you would need to decide if answering your "important" calls is as important as not getting fragged in your game of tactical ops. I figure most people would just answer the phone and not worry about the frag but that's really your choice...

    22. Re:Useless by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Uh, I don't know if the call is important until I answer it. If I were psychic, then I'd have my own 900 number, and it would be in my sig.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  13. Why $11,000? by dmomo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am not complaining about a penalty. But why so much for EACH offense? Is $11,000 arbitrary, or is there some reasoning behind it? Where does the money go, and what is it used for? It just seems like a big contrast with the couple hundred dollar fine at the State level.

    1. Re:Why $11,000? by mhore · · Score: 5, Funny

      11,000 shall be the number, and 11,000 shall the number be. 10,999 is too low, and not the number, and 11,001 is right out.

      --

      Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    2. Re:Why $11,000? by cmburns69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In business and politics, money talks. When you fine a corporation, you have to get them to notice. If the fine were small, the law would be ignored.

      I believe a large part of this money is supposed to go back into keeping the DNC database running.

      And yes, I work for a business in the industry (well, teleresearch, but still annoying)

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    3. Re:Why $11,000? by missing000 · · Score: 0

      It just seems like a big contrast with the couple hundred dollar fine at the State level.

      Thats because your state sucks buddy. In Colorado I can sue for up to $2,000. I like the big penalty. If you call me and I'm on list, burn baby burn.

    4. Re:Why $11,000? by mactov · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about spending the revenue from the fines on a series of public-service announcements and ads reminding people that the best prevention for these things is for them to produce no results? The big problem with spam, telemarketers, et al is that every now and then someone actually does buy something and encourages them.

      Aside from a few very lonesome shut-ins (who are victims of this sort of stuff, not genuine consumers) I don't know of anyone who likes getting spam or telemarketing calls.

      --
      OK, now what?
    5. Re:Why $11,000? by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Maybe they figure if it goes to trial it will cost about $11,000 to pay the lawyers? Just a thought anyways.

      That and considering how much it is, I don't think management (of the telemarketing companies) could let that much fly under the radar very often. Big'ol disincentive.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    6. Re:Why $11,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just seems like a big contrast with the couple hundred dollar fine at the State level.

      Well, it is a lot more expensive to send an FBI agent across the country then to send a state cop across the state.

    7. Re:Why $11,000? by copyconstructor · · Score: 1

      You see, most governments are going to be fining at 10,000 --you're at 10,000 on your fine, where can you go from there? Where? I don't know. Nowhere! Exactly! What we do, if we need that extra push over the cliff, you know what we do?

      You put it up to 11,000.

      Eleven. Exactly. One larger.

      Why don't you just make 10,000 larger, and make 10,000 be the top number, and make that a little larger?

      But these go to 11,000.

    8. Re:Why $11,000? by StarFace · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will cost money for the companies to stay up to date on the no call list. While a smaller fine will keep the smaller businesses in line, the larger businesses would soon discover that it is cheaper to spend a little less time keeping up with the list and make the occasional mistake. With a much larger fine like this, it would discourage slacking off in even the larger marketing companies and departments.

      --
      V
    9. Re:Why $11,000? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about spending the revenue from the fines on a series of public-service announcements and ads reminding people that the best prevention for these things is for them to produce no results?

      Please... Don't we have enough lies on the television. Smoking pot causes terrorism and signing up for free newspaper trials causes telephone solicitation! Maybe we should have a commercial about how staying with abusive husbands causes spousal abuse too.

      The best prevention is a strictly enforced law.

      The big problem with spam, telemarketers, et al is that every now and then someone actually does buy something and encourages them.

      No, the big problem with spam, telemarketers, et al is that they're annoying! The reason they exist is not because someone buys something. The reason they exist is because there's a new idiot looking to make money fast born every minute.

    10. Re:Why $11,000? by StarFace · · Score: 1
      What, more advertisments?

      Seriously though, the solution is not to train the public. The advertisment industry is too intelligent at what it does. There are very well researched reasons for why people buy the things they see advertised. Resisting advertisment is an Active task in today's world. The problem is not the people, they will always be what they are, the problem is the advertisment agencies.

      I do agree that some of the fine amount should go towards something beneficial beyond the overhead of list maintenence. ContraAdvertisments are not the answer though.

      --
      V
    11. Re:Why $11,000? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      staying with an abusive SPOUCE perpetuates the abuse ;-)

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    12. Re:Why $11,000? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      What's a SPOUCE?

      Anyway, just like telephone solicitations, there are degrees. If there's a single incident does that mean you should leave forever? What about the kids? Likewise if there's a single call from a company, and they offer you an amazing deal, why shouldn't you take it? Yeah, there's the trust issue, but let's say they don't ask you for any credit card numbers or SSN or anything.

    13. Re:Why $11,000? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Maybe it stands for a spammer?

      Stupid Pissing-Off Unsolicited Commercial Emailer

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    14. Re:Why $11,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid random nitpick - 11,002 should be right out.

    15. Re:Why $11,000? by Manic+Ken · · Score: 1

      Hi, it's me again.. Just wanted to inform you that my smart-ass answer was the result of a really bad day, some smartass(I'm not alone beeing one), told me to go google to get informed..,turned out that all our truble with spam would magically disapear if we just paid $5 to some asocciation....and the poster was modded +5 for that.... anyway, there was nothing wrong with your post.
      Yours sleep deprived
      Nick Mean

  14. Dammit !! by Timesprout · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I told you not to show me this article

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  15. Happy Dude by hoopyfroodman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Greetings, friends. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So use it and send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay. Eternal happiness is just a dollar away." 'Happy Dude' Well, I guess Homer's marketing scam won't work anymore.... drats! There goes my retirement plan. :(

    1. Re:Happy Dude by GraZZ · · Score: 1

      Greetings, friends. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So use it and send $11001 to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay. Eternal happiness is just a dollar and an unsolicited call fine away.

  16. Nice! by nherc · · Score: 4, Informative
    I can't wait for this to go live... then I can disable my $5/month Telemarketer block via the phone co. It's only about 90% effective.

    BTW, here is the FTC's current attempts at curtailing E-mail SPAM .

    It really is amazing the amount of trouble and money we all have to go through to rid ourselve of this plague of unwanted advertsing. Seems like it should be illegal, don't it?

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Nice! by Hellkitty · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Caller ID has been working 100% for me for the past few years, and it only costs $1 a month. It is quite simple - if you show up as "Out of Area" or "Unknown Caller", there is not possibly anything that we have to talk about. You know who I am when I pick up the phone - I need to have the same information on you before I determine if I choose to communicate with you or not.

      I'll sign up, but I doubt that it will work too well. I did a little bit of telemarketing work while in college for some beer money, and let's just say that the place I worked for would not give two shits about this fine. I think they really stretched the boundaries of the law, and they'll probably find a way to do so with this. Enforcement will be difficult. If they call me even though I'm on the list, they are banking on the fact that I don't care enough to follow up on it. And if one call gets through to you once every six months, are you really going to be enraged enough to file a complaint? And once you do file the complaint, you know it will be caught up in beauracratic BS for quite some time before any action comes out of it.

    2. Re:Nice! by nherc · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, this is a sort of caller ID that spits the telemarketers a canned message if there number is on the phone companies list.

      I wouldn't feel safe not answering all of the "Out of Area" and "Unknown" calls... who knows maybe it's your wife from a pay phone after her car broke down. Shaite happens.

      --
      'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    3. Re:Nice! by dingman · · Score: 1
      And if one call gets through to you once every six months, are you really going to be enraged enough to file a complaint?

      For the first call, I politely ask them if they are aware that Indiana has a do-not-call list, and then inform them that my phone number is on that list. If there were ever a second call, I would complain. Hasn't happened yet.

    4. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Around here, a payphone shows up on caller ID as "Payphone". Holy shit!

      Plus, I have this magical device called an "answering machine". With this "answering machine", the person can leave a message, and if I am home and recognize them, I can pick up the phone.

    5. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shaite happens.

      Yes, it does. That's why you do a little preparation. Buy a cell phone for your wife. they're dirt cheap now. When she calls, her number will show up.
    6. Re:Nice! by feldsteins · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The main problem with caller ID is that it often works like this:

      1. Phone company charges you for a great new service allowing you to see who's calling, thus eliminating the need to speak with telemarketers.

      2. Phone company charges telemarketers for the ability to mask their number from the caller ID units.

      3. Phone company charges you for a new ANTI-anti-missle....

      and so on.

      --
      You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
    7. Re:Nice! by nherc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Okay, so she forgets her cellphone or the battery is dead and you go about your business forgetting to check the message after seeing it's "Unavailable". :)

      Point being... just because you came up with "solutions" to that problem doesn't mean you'll never miss an important or wanted call just going by the CallerID.

      --
      'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    8. Re:Nice! by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      I work for a call support center. It is quite annoying when some customer requests a cal back and then will not answer the phone because they block all call id calls. Then they get upset that we did not call them back.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    9. Re:Nice! by mobileskimo · · Score: 1

      Which is why it's not a solution for you. I strongly agree with the philosophy that if you don't identify yourself, you have me at a disadvantage and I don't want to play. Shit happens. That's why its called shit. Emergency? Risk? It's happened to me on ocassion. I accept that life's not perfect. I'll accept the compromise.

      "Hi, I'm calling you to tell you about a fanastic..."

      "What's your name and number?"

      "Excuse me? Why do you want that?"

      "So I can call you on your private phone and try to sell you some of the lint from my testicals. I have a fantastic collection..."

      --
      "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
    10. Re:Nice! by drwtsn32 · · Score: 1

      the place I worked for would not give two shits about this fine.

      That's right... they'll give 11,000 shits.

    11. Re:Nice! by smartin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True, caller ID can give you a reasonable indication that the call is not worth answering. The problem is that you've already got up from what you are doing to go and answer the bloody phone only to find that it is not worth answering. Personally at that point i'm pissed enough to either answer and chew them out or answer and jerk their chain by wasting their time in some manner. My current fav is to just say hang on while i get the person whose name they ask for and leave the phone off the hook for a while.

      As for enforcement and getting people to report abusers, that's easy. The govt should just pay the victim a portion the fine. Give me $500 of the $11k and i will persue it every time.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    12. Re:Nice! by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Or somebody with a new cell phone. Or your boss from the "After 5" exchange. Or your asshole best friend who dials *71 before calling you.

      Now, if there were a law to force telemarketers and other solicitors to brand their phone numbers as such, we'd have no problems.

      I just tell whoever it is that they called my cell phone. They apologize and hang up quick. Suckers.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    13. Re:Nice! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2, Informative

      FTC's current attempts at curtailing E-mail SPAM.

      Please, don't refer to email spam in all caps. SPAM(tm) is a trademark of Hormel Foods, who have been quite good-natured about the use of the term to describe bulk email.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    14. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know Caller ID is what many people use to screen their calls... but, having to look at the Caller ID screen means you will be disturbed (whether or not it is near you).

      Not to mention if that "unknown" caller is actually someone you know needing you for whatever reason. From what the parent posted about Caller ID working 100%, I would be afraid that it is working _101%+_.

      I guess the point is, I am surprised that many people take this kind of action/risk and are really worried about missing an e-mail due to a junk filter giving a false-positive.

    15. Re:Nice! by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you've already got up from what you are doing to go and answer the bloody phone only to find that it is not worth answering.

      What sort of low-tech world do you live in? I've got incoming caller ID info broadcast to touchpanels throughout my home. A glance at the panel (I'm always close to one) tells me if it's worth my time to go in search of the phone. With a small mic embedded in the panels (next feature) I could answer right from there.

      Before I had the touch panels, I had a text to speech engine broadcasting the number throughout the house. Download some freeware and fire up that old called ID capable modem...

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    16. Re:Nice! by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      Then your PBX admin should set it to send a valid number. Don't whine because you're set up wrong.

    17. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hate SPAM. SPAM sucks, all types of SPAM.

      SPAM

    18. Re:Nice! by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      Okay, so she forgets her cellphone or the battery is dead and you go about your business forgetting to check the message after seeing it's "Unavailable".

      ...and she only decides to call you once (instead of "maybe he's in the bathroom") and she can't think of anybody else's phone number and there is no one around (maybe she's in a desert) and she used her last bit of change and can't remember how to dial collect and and and ...

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    19. Re:Nice! by swordboy · · Score: 1

      Caller ID has been working 100% for me for the past few years

      The funny thing is that the phone company sells this "feature" to the telespammers so that their callerID reads nothing. Then they sell us "privacy manager" to top things off.

      The FCC should sue the phone companies for this practice. If they required all telespammers to have a telespammer callerID label, there'd be no need for this database.

      In any event, don't just not answer the phone. I always answer and then hang up during the 5 second routing delay. This way, they have to pay for the call.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    20. Re:Nice! by Eraser_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A contracting partner of mine has a thing which says "I do not accept calls from telemarketers. Push 1 to connect, or enter your phone number so the call can be screened, and have the number added to the accept list".

      I can call him on my cell phone and home phone because Call ID works, but from a friends house with no call ID I have to hit 1, and then it rings.

    21. Re:Nice! by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "I wouldn't feel safe not answering all of the "Out of Area" and "Unknown" calls... who knows maybe it's your wife from a pay phone after her car broke down."

      Now if only we had software phones...

      Your number is not recognised: type the passphrase to make the phone ring, or leave a message in the filter-bin

    22. Re:Nice! by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Good strategy, except if you have a lot of people legitimately calling with "Unknown Caller".

      One of my better friends runs a business out of their house, they have an unidentified line so they can use it for both business and personal. Much of my family, including my parents, lives out of country so caller id doesn't work. I actually get more legitimate calls that are unidentified than telemarketers. (And some of the telemarketers actually identify themselves.)

      Of course, I've gotten less telemarketers since I signed up for MN's state no-call list, (in fact I've gotten about two in six months, both at the beginning) but that ratio is from before that.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    23. Re:Nice! by kavau · · Score: 1
      if you show up as "Out of Area" or "Unknown Caller", there is not possibly anything that we have to talk about

      Unfortunately it doesn't work that well for people with friends and/or relatives in foreign countries. When I get a call from Europe, it just shows up as "unknown caller" and I have no idea whether it's a friend or a telemarketer. I wish they would at least provide the country of origin...

    24. Re:Nice! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Hormel has not been good natured, they have been royal sons-of-bitches about the whole thing. They only recently gave up the futile fight, and decided to propose the SPAM things as a last-ditch effort.

      SPAM SPAM SPAM...

      Would you like to buy a Micro Soft drink with those 2000 Windows?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    25. Re:Nice! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Bull. That page has been up for at least 2 or 3 years.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    26. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elegy For *BSD


      I am a *BSD user
      and I try hard to be brave
      That is a tall order
      *BSD's foot is in the grave.

      I tap at my toy keyboard
      and whistle a happy tune
      but keeping happy's so hard,
      *BSD died so soon.

      Each day I wake and softly sob
      Nightfall finds me crying
      Not only am I a zit faced slob
      but *BSD is dying.

    27. Re:Nice! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Fine, my use of the word "recent" was misplaced. Other than that, it's completely true.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    28. Re:Nice! by Hellkitty · · Score: 1

      That's interesting, because I'm pretty sure I get "International Call" popping up on mine. I only get an occasional european call, but I can't honestly recall how it pops up. I usually am aware when someone is going to be calling me internationally and am expecting the call. If it comes from Canada, I get something along the lines of "Ontario Call". I agree, it would be nice if there was some universal standard on this. I doubt many telemarkets would be calling me from Europe, so I would be willing to pick up something that said "German Call" or what have you.

  17. Too Bad Enforcement isn't moved up... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 4, Informative

    Enforcement will still only begin in October, and even then with the way it is written, the telemarketers will not need to actually look at the list until January 2004, as they only need to check against the list once every 3 months.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:Too Bad Enforcement isn't moved up... by jroysdon · · Score: 1


      Sounds like a nice window to get the list and do some major telephone spamming. I wonder what protections there are against that?

  18. A sigh of relief by andyring · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Finally, this idea is taking hold. I'll admit it does run a bit contrary to my conservative, smaller government, pro-business beliefs, but on this issue, I agree, this is the right thing to do. Of course, we'll hear a bunch of whining and moaning from the telemarketers about how it will hurt them. And, quite frankly, I don't care. Their calls harass me enough that I think it is worth it.

    I worked at RadioShack for six months a few years ago, and we were supposed to try and push additional things on our customers (cell phones, batteries, cables, more cell phones, and cell phones again). I hate suggestive selling. I hate doing it and I hate it being done to me. If I want it, I will buy it.

    If I want info on refinancing my home, new windows, fixing my credit, buying a coupon book, getting another credit card, etc., LET ME SEEK IT OUT. I despise the thought that others (aka telemarketers) believe they know what I want or need better than I do. I am perfectly capable of deciding what products or services I wish to purchase, so let me decide on my own without invasive selling.

    1. Re:A sigh of relief by ebh · · Score: 3, Funny

      The worst suggestive sell: I went to one of the Big Three Burger Chains once, ordered my heart attack on a plate, and the poor sod behind the counter asked, as he was required to do, "Would you like HOT CRISPY FRIES with that?" No, I want COLD SOGGY FRIES, just like I got the last time I was here.

    2. Re:A sigh of relief by vidarh · · Score: 1

      The problem is that pushing additional things WORK. Time and time again some company achieve ridiculous revenue increases by doing this. The thing is, it doesn't cost them anything, which mean even a very small percent of people saying yes is a significant bonus. When you're working with razor thin margins, techniques like this can be the difference between a loser and a highly profitable winner in the marketplace if you get it right.

    3. Re:A sigh of relief by vidarh · · Score: 1
      That's a classic sales 101 mistake: NEVER, EVER ask a question if the answer might be no. When possible it is preferrable to stick to statements. Don't ask for value judgements from the customer, or the result often end up just like you describe.

      Instead of asking if you wanted hot crispy fries, it might have been better to say "Our fries are really hot and crispy today. Would you like some?". It's instantly making it harder for the customer to say no, because if they got cold and soggy fries last time, they've already disarmed you by saying that TODAY their fries ARE hot and crispy, and people like to agree with if you state something and they don't know for sure you're wrong.

      It's a bit long though, and still open you up to value judgements from repeat customers who may have been disappointed several times. Sometimes you MUST push the value of a product - if the product isn't well known to the customer you need to explain to them why the product is worth it. But fries is a well known product for practically all consumers. So "Would you like fries with that?" might be better, unless you really have exceptional quality fries and want to try to make sure the customers realize that (and you aren't worried that they might disagree).

      Taking it to the extreme, just saying "fries with that?" might possibly work even better, as you're turning it almost into a statement. You're not presenting it as a decision, but as a request for confirmation that, yes, indeed, you do want fries with that as expected of a good consumer like you.

      Sales is 99% psychology and leading the customer to want to agree with you - someone who is ready to buy something is likely fully prepared to buy a little bit more if you make it "hard enough" psychologically to say no ("ooh, I have to think and make a decision, and they'll think I'm cheap if I say no - better just agree with what the nice man is saying").

      If you're good, you'll sell a shitload, and even get people starting to make up ridiculous excuses for why they can't buy FooBars from you today, because they want your approval not to agree with you.

      People are sheep :)

    4. Re:A sigh of relief by ebh · · Score: 1

      You're right. Never let them say no. Ask them something like, "What size fries can I get you with that," or more simply, "What else can I get for you today?" Whatever answer they give won't roll off the tongue as easily as "No".

      To step back one level of abstraction, the fact that a bunch of barely- or not-quite-employed techies are even talking about whether people "want fries with that" makes me shudder.

    5. Re:A sigh of relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your statement. I make it a matter of PRINCIPLE to NEVER EVER buy anything from these people. I also have done the "please remove me from your list" and rarely answer the phone if the Caller ID indicates it's "Out of area" or "unknown". The calls have decreased in number dramatically.

      However, and it's a BIG however, telemarketing in this fashion works! This must be true otherwise they wouldn't do it. You can't transfer your own personal behaviour onto your less cerebrally adequate fellow human beings. Some people obviously pick up the phone, absorb the sell and end up buying. Look at the number of home shopping networks there are! Some people just get a buzz out of buying crap they don't need, with money they don't have.

      It's the sad truth.

  19. I want on a "Please Call Me" list by L.+VeGas · · Score: 4, Funny

    It gets kind of lonely here in my basement playing Quake and massaging my mom's feet.

    1. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by gid · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's your number? Post it here, we'll slashdot your phone for you.

    2. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's your number? Post it here, we'll slashdot your phone for you.

      303-499-7111. Call now for a REALLY good time

      --

    3. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by BexGu · · Score: 1

      What's your number? Post it here, we'll slashdot your phone for you.

      867-5309
      Ask for Jennie

    4. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by rherbert · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those of you wondering what this number is, it's the time of day number at NIST.

    5. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by pergamon · · Score: 1

      for a "really good time".

      that's pretty damn funny.

    6. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Use Google to look up phone numbers:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=303-499-7111

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:I want on a "Please Call Me" list by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1
      Use Google to look up phone numbers:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=303-499-7111
      Better yet, use Google's phonebook lookup:
      http://www.google.com/search?sa=X&oi=fwp&pb=f&q=30 3-499-7111
      (which was the "More phonebook listings" link at the top of your Google link)

  20. My Problem with This by moehoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Telemarketers do not follow current law. Very rarely do I get them to tell me their name or company name, let alone a manager name or address. 80% of them hang up when I ask to be placed on their DNC list.

    If they don't follow the law now, why will they follow it in the future.

    And in terms of the phone companies, they see the law and fines as just another expense in a risk/reward scenario. Slamming has been illegal for many year, but they still do it because the fines do not match the profit they get from it.

    This sounds like a great opportunity, but put me down as a skeptic. If the courts don't swat it down, then it will be simply ignored. The governments (local/state/federal) won't/can't enforce existing law.

    I get up to 10 calls a day. I'm sick of it. My phone and my e-mail has been confiscated by marketers of crap that less then .05% of the population wants or needs.

    Also, beware of the following: After this law takes effect, people will be out to get you to put your phone number on all sorts of things (product registration, checks, etc.) because the fine print will say that by giving your phone number, you waive your DNC status with them and their partners. Guard your phone number and e-mail address like you (should) guard your SSN.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:My Problem with This by leinhos · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      Short of paying to have an "unlisted" phone number, or changing my phone number every 6 months, there's not much we can do until everyone refuses to buy junk they don't need from people they don't know. Telemarketing is just another one of those "ruined it for the rest of us" cases where now I refuse to buy anything solicited to me over the phone (why would I anyway?). The real problem is human nature/behavior, because the only reason Telemarketers try to sell us something we don't need over the phone or via email is because they think there are enough (as a percentage of population) simple-minded people that would fall for the trick.

      There has to be a change of behavior on the consumer's part before telemarketing becomes cost ineffective.

    2. Re:My Problem with This by gid · · Score: 1

      While I feel for you, there's pretty much nothing you can do but request a different phone number, and change your email address. Well, email can be solved by other means such as spamassassin, but for me, a considerable amount of spam has been getting thru as of late.

      You must be getting a different crowd calling you, because I've never had someone hang up when I requested to be put on their DNC list.

      You wanna make it pain for telemarketers? Waste their time--Act really interested, and then put them on hold indefinitely because "someone's is at the door" or whatever immediate emergency or just bullshit with them for as long as you can stand it.

      Another thing I though of, be REALLY rude to telemarketers, it will make their job miserable so they'll want to quit. And when more telemarketers start quitting, their pay will go up because no one will want to do it. So when you think about it, you'll not really being rude or mean, you're just trying increase their pay.

    3. Re:My Problem with This by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      hanging up doesn't really make them untraceable, i highly doubt they don't bother relaying their calls through some foreign hosts or something like that, the numbers that have made the calls (should be) are available through your phone company.

      if they don't follow the current laws, sue them or at least report them in.

      i on the other hand havent received a single telemarketing call since i got my mobile.

      phone and email address are for people to contact you, they get pretty useless if you share them only to your doctor. waiving your dnc status through something like product registration would have little point(especially when put to 'with them and their partners'), odds are that the law is made so that such trickery wouldn't matter.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:My Problem with This by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they don't follow the law now, why will they follow it in the future.

      Because this law is much easier to enforce. Either your number is on the list, or it isn't. There's no "hang up before someone asks to be put on the list." There's no argument about whether or not you're on the list. There's no playing games with different companies selling information to each other. There's no questions of jurisdiction with calls made across state lines. All companies are affected.

      From an enforcement standpoint, if you get a call (after three months or whatever it takes for them to read it), you report it.

    5. Re:My Problem with This by deblau · · Score: 4, Informative
      Also, beware of the following: After this law takes effect, people will be out to get you to put your phone number on all sorts of things (product registration, checks, etc.) because the fine print will say that by giving your phone number, you waive your DNC status with them and their partners.

      Sorry. I can't waive my First Amendment rights in a civil contract. I can't waive FCC law through a contract, either. Anyone dumb enough to think that their fine print will get them out of trouble with the FCC deserves the lawsuit I file against them.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    6. Re:My Problem with This by pdhenry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fine print is: any company with which you have done business in the last year (2 years?) can call you even if your name's on the DoNotCall list. So by including your number on the registration you implicitlt/explicitly have given the OK for them to call.

    7. Re:My Problem with This by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      Telemarketers do not follow current law. Very rarely do I get them to tell me their name or company name, let alone a manager name or address. 80% of them hang up when I ask to be placed on their DNC list.

      If they don't follow the law now, why will they follow it in the future.

      If one caller in a hundred is willing to chase that $11,000 fine, and if only one in a hundred succeed in tracking you down and pressing charges, your cost of doing business on the phone still went up by $1.10 per call, plus court costs. And every suit's going to be easier to prosecute than the last, meaning the success rate goes up up up.

      You'd have to be doing really well with your marketing campaign to make that cost effective. :-)

    8. Re:My Problem with This by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      Telemarketers do not follow current law. Very rarely do I get them to tell me their name or company name, let alone a manager name or address. 80% of them hang up when I ask to be placed on their DNC list.

      Where do you live? If in the U.S., what state are you in? In Pennsylvania, I've never had someone hang up when I ask to be placed on the DNC list (and, by the way, I can't remember the last time I had to do that since the state enacted its own DNC list).

      Here's my suggestion; make it your primary goal to get the name of the company. If they're trying to sell you something, then they're going to be hooked when you politely say (with feigned mild interest and in a casual manner), "I'm sorry, I didn't catch the company name, but this sounds interesting -- who is it again?". Once you have the company name, then you have them on the hook.

    9. Re:My Problem with This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I always have fun telling that I'll be glad to file an FCC Form 475. All of a sudden, they seem real interested in adding me to their DNC list.

      However, I've had others who've told me that it takes 6 weeks for it to become effective. I tell them that the FCC won't take that long. (I'm sure some of them figure it's less than 6 weeks until 1 July, but I don't care - the violation took place last week, not in July, so it was a violation of existing law at that time.)

      FCC Form 475 can be completed online; be sure to save the information manually elsewhere and note the serial number that the site spits back.

      My most frequent abusers are the assholes down in Orlando who dump recordings at me to call a specific toll-free number and a bullshit "special code" like "Mickey453" to be able to sign up for a discounted trip to Orlando. They're going to be in for a rude shock when the FCC finally gets ahold of them; I'm sure all of the toll-free numbers will eventually be traced back to a specific boiler room, and the budget deficit will be reduced by a few hundred thousand dollars.

    10. Re:My Problem with This by Anthony+Stuckey · · Score: 1

      Writing "unlisted" into the phone number box on forms hasn't caused a problem for me yet. Most businesses have no need to know this information.

  21. Doesn't matter, most calls from India now by shodson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This new law probably won't matter because it seems like most of the telemarketing calls I've been getting lately have been coming from India. If MCI hires an Indian telemarketing company to call me did MCI break this law? How does this apply to overseas telemarketers?

    1. Re:Doesn't matter, most calls from India now by edgrale · · Score: 1

      It is easy, if I hire you to kill someone I'm as guilty as you are. If they buy someone oversea to do it they are breaking the law.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Doesn't matter, most calls from India now by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      If MCI hires an Indian telemarketing company to call me did MCI break this law?

      Of course they did.

    3. Re:Doesn't matter, most calls from India now by DougMackensie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MCI isn't responsible, but the marketing company (it is at least a skeleton company) who routes the phone calls is responsible for the fines. All the Indian telemarketing companies route their phone calls through the internet to a US based call center. You didn't think they'd really pay for the long distance did you ;)

    4. Re:Doesn't matter, most calls from India now by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      {DISCLAIMER}

      This is not legal advice. You are not a client. I am not even a lawyer. What I say here is probably 100% wrong and anyone who takes any action based on it is a blithering jackass who deserves whatever bad shit this is likely to befall them. If you want competent legal advice, you need to consult with someone who is an attorney.

      {/DISCLAIMER}

      Now that that's out of the way . . . Quoth the poster:

      This new law probably won't matter because it seems like most of the telemarketing calls I've been getting lately have been coming from India. If MCI hires an Indian telemarketing company to call me did MCI break this law? How does this apply to overseas telemarketers?

      First off, Worldcom^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H MCI is an American company. An American company that uses an Indian outfit is subject to liability in American courts for the wrongful acts of said Indian outfit. So, if it can be shown that MCI's hired gun didn't check the do-not-call list, for example, MCI can be fined. The same tactic can be used against companies that hire spammers. I have done it, and successfully.

      The question is, will they be fined? AFAIK, the law is missing a private right of action. This means you and I can't sue the bastard^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcompany that called us 24 times after we registered our number on the national do-not-call list. You have to wait for the FCC, in their infinite wisdom, to do so, for now. I wouldn't be surprised if states enacted laws allowing a private right of action for violations.

    5. Re:Doesn't matter, most calls from India now by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      if you did buisness with MCI before then they can call you so it does not matter.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:Doesn't matter, most calls from India now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You = teh gay

  22. Hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hello, thank you for calling me. Pay $11,000. Goodbye, eat a dick, and have a nice day.

  23. Coprorate Influence? by cnmill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wonder how much this is being backed by large corporations with the desired effect of choking off smaller copetitors with smaller marketing budgets?

    --
    How sleepless is the egg, knowing that which throws the stone forsees the bone.
    1. Re:Coprorate Influence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many small companies actually use unsolicited phone calls as a marketing ploy? I don't think it is nearly significant enough for it to be even on the radar's of large companies. I would also note that the FTC is supposed to be our only defense against large companies so I really hope you are just a paranoid conspiracy theorist.

  24. thank god, by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
    Lately i have been getting telemarketing calls on my cell phone.
    I don't advertise my cell phone no. so i wonder how somebody got hold of it.

    usually they ask for some other person, pretending to be a wrong number, but then ask me my name and where I live. Quite Annoying really.

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    1. Re:thank god, by mkarpinski · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that it was actually a fineable offense for Telemarketers to knowingly call a cell phone number.

      This was the first site to pop up on Google to have information about cell phones and telemarketers: Californians Against Telephone Solicitation

      I'm sure the FCC has more info.

      --
      As below, so above and beyond, I imagine drawn beyond the lines of reason. Push the envelope. Watch it bend.
  25. Shucks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Damn, they're going to stop calling me? I'll miss them, cause now I cant listen to half their spewl, tell them I'm interested but i'll be right back and then put them on hold. Sometimes they're still hanging on after 15 minutes or so .. when I feel sorry for them and yell "FUCK YOU" and hang up on them.

    (FYI, I know they're just doing their job etc. that's why I only do this to telemarketers who keep calling me back after I have told them specifically not to call me)

  26. wish by jr87 · · Score: 1

    I wish they just gave us the name and address of spammers...that would be fun

  27. Logistics ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Funny
    Okay, is this going to be like every other governmental agency that comes up with a great idea that will have a three year backlog on complaints. And even if it's not, is there a set definition of "solicitced" phone call.

    If you want to get really technical about it, unless you request someone call you, every phone call is unsolicited. I understand the argument about how if you give someone your phone number then you are granting them basic permissions to call you, but unless you unlist your phone number it has to be assumed that your number is not only public, but an invitation for you to be called.

    For every policy/law/order/decree there is a loophole or a way to get around it. Just a matter or time before this becomes nullified.

    I am not going to be adding myself to this list for the main reason that I love telemarketers. I actually had a gentleman call me last week.

    Telemarketer: Yes may I please speak to Doug.

    ME: May I ask who's calling please?

    TM: This is bob calling about an offer Doug just can't refuse

    ME: I don't think he can, Doug killed himself yesterday , it was so sad he had gone to college and then dropped out to be a professional rollerblader and then after a horrible drunk driving accident he broke his left leg, needless to say his skating career was over. He needed money to pay off all the medical bills so he got a job as a telemarketer selling the stupidest things over the phone and trying his best to make his quota for the night so that he could make it home to shoot up and stop the pain. Day after day he would go to work and realize how low he had sunk and truly began to question his worthiness to society as a whole. I guess he finally realized he was worthless and ate a 12 gauge shotgun shell. Messy as hell, but effective, we're still actually trying to figure out how to clean it all up. And all that just because he had a lousy job as a telemarketer.

    *click*

    Don't know how effective it is, but think of it like as an invited prank phone call where you can fuck with them all day long. Tell them you want to buy all there stuff and give the credit card number of 8888-8888-8888-8888, which you know is your number because you ordered one off of the TV and that's the number that was on it. Or just really play with their heads, tell them you want them to seduce you into buying their product or role play with them, have them call you mr moneybags or something. Ask them out on a date or something, have some real fun, these people abosultely hate their job, trust me, and you can only make it worse for them.

    Don't feel guilty, they called you ... remember?

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Logistics ... by Rorgg · · Score: 1
      I'm with you on this. My goal is to make Telemarketing such a hellish profession that nobody would take the job for under $100/hour, making it unfeasable to use telemarketing.

      Plus, it's fun. Recently I had this one.

      "Hi, this is Jane, calling from your magazine publishers. We're calling..."

      "Hi, Jane. Which magazine?"

      "I'm sorry?"

      "Which of my magazine's publishers are you calling from?"

      "We're Your Magazine Publishers. I'm calling..."

      "Sorry, which magazaine?"

      "Err, the name of the company is Your Magazine Publishers."

      "So you're actually not affiliated with any of my magazines?"

      (CLICK)

    2. Re:Logistics ... by suds · · Score: 2, Funny

      I live in UK and most of the calls I recieve are related to double glazing. I got so tired of them started to get back to them in a novel way..here is my typical conversion.

      TM: Hello, could I speak to the house owner please?
      ME: Speaking..
      TM: We can replace all your windows for less than 1500 GBP.
      ME:Oh! thats very interesting..so you sell windows?
      TM: Yes..
      ME: I am in window glass manufacturing business. Would you be interested in bying the glass from us? I will do a very good deal for you...

      *Click*

      and I just laugh and laugh and laugh..

    3. Re:Logistics ... by HowlinMad · · Score: 1

      yes, I love doing this. I would do it in colelge all of the time. I would just listen to the offer, and just keep leading them on. I would see how ling I could keep them on the phone. I once spent an hour on the phone with some lady before she realized I was not going to buy magazines. Its a great way to ruin thier quotas!

    4. Re:Logistics ... by xTown · · Score: 3, Funny

      It can backfire. I got a call once from a magazine salesman and when he asked me what magazines I liked to read, I said "I don't read too much...since the accident. I just can't get used to using Braille." He said, "Oh, I'm sorry to hear that" and ended the call.

      I now receive solicitations from blindness organizations.

    5. Re:Logistics ... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      It can backfire. I got a call once from a magazine salesman and when he asked me what magazines I liked to read, I said "I don't read too much...since the accident. I just can't get used to using Braille." He said, "Oh, I'm sorry to hear that" and ended the call.

      I now receive solicitations from blindness organizations.


      In Braile? That actually sounds kinda cool. If not, then that's just funny.

      --

    6. Re:Logistics ... by Songblade001 · · Score: 1

      Don't feel guilty, they called you ... remember?

      I hate to rain on your parade, but this is someone who is only doing their job. Yes, they interrupt you at inconvenient times, but that doesn't give you the right to harass them. I get phone calls from banks, local newspapers and various other companies trying to sell me things and I am unfailingly polite to the other person. Annoying or not, people still have to make a living.

      You can't go down to McDonalds and start harassing the cashiers there, so why should telemarketers be any different.

      Just my 2

    7. Re:Logistics ... by smartin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because they Fucking called you and invaded your privacy and peace. Thats why

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    8. Re:Logistics ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Godwin]but this is someone who is only doing their job[/Godwin]

      So were the guards at Auschwitz.

      Hint: some "jobs" are inherently unethical. If you find yourself thinking of becoming a telemarketer, I suggest tht you consider prostitution instead. It's less degrading, and there's a better chance your customer will be HAPPY afterwards.

    9. Re:Logistics ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yes, they interrupt you at inconvenient times, but that doesn't give you the right to harass them. ... Annoying or not, people still have to make a living.

      You can't go down to McDonalds and start harassing the cashiers there, so why should telemarketers be any different.

      How is it different? Because I have to GO to Mc Donalds, somewhere that I don't hold sacred as my own, and something I would do as my own choice. These people call MY house, they aren't doing it because they are "making a living", they're doing it because they're no talent ass clowns who have nothing more to offer society than sitting on their ass trying to peddle shit wares.

      They want to invade my home then they will feel my wrath, they are an unwanted intruder into my comfort zone and I will treat them accordingly. Since I also take pleasure in tormenting their little souls to the point that they want to reach out and cry, I want them to call. It's a double edge sword, I don't want to be bothered by them, but if I'm bored I will certainly take the time to just mess with their heads every chance I get.

      Obviously you are or know someone who is a telemarketer. Let me get you in on a little secret, once you work telemarketing you are no longer human, you are the scum of the earth and deserve nothing more than a strong kick upside the head and to be placed in the middle of a desert to slowly rot in the sun of dehydration and heat exhuation. Deserving for worthless pond scum as those who work telemarketing.

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    10. Re:Logistics ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they choose to take a job of annoying thousands of people, then they get what they deserve.

    11. Re:Logistics ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is your privacy invaded?

    12. Re:Logistics ... by dacarr · · Score: 1
      A friend once told me of other ways you can play with them, as such:

      "Actually, today's your lucky day! I have been selling this life insurance policy...."

      "Well, I don't think it'll matter much, because you're the last person I'll speak to before I kill myself. You have a good reason for me to live?...."

      --
      This sig no verb.
    13. Re:Logistics ... by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Ya know, I think he may hate telemarketers. =)

      --
      This sig no verb.
    14. Re:Logistics ... by marnerd · · Score: 1
      That's why I try to advise them to make better life choices.

      "You know, you could probably make the same money working retail, and it is probably healthier than sitting around all day calling people. And I'm SURE it is much better for your karma. Do you WANT to come back in your next life as a vole?"

      Oddly, they seem to respond to this by hanging up without a thank you. Future voles, all of 'em.

      --
      Not so much a sig as a lack of one.
    15. Re:Logistics ... by mttlg · · Score: 1

      I hate to rain on your parade, but this is someone who is only doing their job.

      Right, they were only following orders...

      Yes, they interrupt you at inconvenient times, but that doesn't give you the right to harass them.

      Correct again, that right comes from Amendment I, U.S. Constitution. Well, technically that only protects the right, but you get the idea.

      I get phone calls from banks, local newspapers and various other companies trying to sell me things and I am unfailingly polite to the other person.

      That is your choice - there is no requirement for anyone to be polite to people who intrude on them in the privacy of their homes, whether they knock on the door, call on the phone, or send invitations to check out their webcams in an instant message.

      Annoying or not, people still have to make a living.

      You have the right to try to make a living, but there's no guarantee that you'll succeed, despite what some large corporations might think. If your chosen profession is a street performer, ridicule, insults, and indifference are things you have to be able to deal with. Telemarketing is no different. If you don't like it, pick a new profession.

      You can't go down to McDonalds and start harassing the cashiers there, so why should telemarketers be any different.

      Sure you can, and I'm sure many people do, most notably environmentalist, anarchist, and anti-globalism activists. This can cause them to get kicked out (and arrested if their actions are severe enough to warrant it), just like if some low-life telemarketer scum calls me to tell me how much better DSL is than cable because of their direct connection to the central office, I can debate the issue with the ignorant bastard and hang up on him, even telling him to go to hell and stick his DSL connection where the sun don't shine, if I so desire (and the company can be fined if they violate do not call laws).

      Now, if I were to threaten said bastard with bodily harm, this could result in an arrest, just like a McDonald's cashier who shoots a nut-job dancing around shouting "Meat is murder!" and throwing fake blood all over the place would probably face criminal charges.

    16. Re:Logistics ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 1

      :-)

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    17. Re:Logistics ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ARGH ME MATEY.

    18. Re:Logistics ... by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      He hates people face-to-face, too. That's why they make him work help desk - the person on the other end can't see his evil expressions quite so well.

      =)

      --
      ± 29 dB
  28. An interesting incident last night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Speaking of telemarketers, I got a pre-recorded call last night on my answering maching while I was out. It said to call an 877 number to get more info on this alarm system they were pitching. So I decided to call to inform the person that my state has a do-not-call list that they are obviously ignoring. Funny thing is, I could never get through. For over an hour, all I got was a fast busy signal. You'd think that the morons would at least want to make sure that the marks can actually call in so they can get suckered. Idiots!

    But perhaps some other folks would like to check and see if they can get through. Their number is 1-877-723-3872. If you call, feel free to tell them about the legality (or lack thereof) of leaving messages on answering machines and ignoring do-not-call lists.

    1. Re:An interesting incident last night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you chump!!!! all they wanted to know was which systems they put the message on call back. by dialing the 877 they "by law" have your full phone numebr (if they pay for the full number) WHETHER OR NOT IT WAS CALLER-ID BLOCKED!!!! you are a chump. They do not care about talking with you, they just wanted confirmed numebrs of chumps like you.

      a VAST many of them are machines dialing domain reg lists and have a fake pre recorded "I am sorry, I must have dialed the wrong number " it a recording of an old man thinking maybe you will not know what they are trying to do.

      ALWAYS dial credit card companies from PAY PHONES and same thing with calling back telemarketers.

      by the way calling telemarketers costs them money.

      some shitty comapnies, such as pepsi refuse to connect to payphones from angry customers... i tried in NY state many times. Pepsi blocked calls from payphones. Another freedom... freedom to bitch taken away.

      I like pepsi but they must have a TON of angry enraged customers or something.

    2. Re:An interesting incident last night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, before you call someone a chump, do some thinking of your own. Try this:

      They don't need my number. Otherwise, how did they call me in the first place? As for any other info, a reverse lookup would do that. And they already know there's a live person on my line. They got an answering machine, didn't they?

      Next, I told you that it was a fast busy, not a regular busy. Fast busies indicate a switching problem in the telephone network, and, in this case, it happened too quickly for the call to have been routed and connected. Kinda hard for ANI to get any info to them when the call never completed.

      Oh, and one more thing. Read your response back to yourself. Do you sound like an asshole? Yep, you do. Do you take such a tone in all your daily encounters, or just the ones that aren't face-to-face?

  29. How.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ....accessable is this system?

    Let's say I'm a business that calls people for a living....SLOMINS SHIELD SECURITY SYSTEMS come to mind, I get bothered by them EVERY MONTH.

    I'f I'm SLOMIN, how do I get access to the DO NOT CALL LIST? Is it an internet resource that I have to check on before I call someone on my cold-calling list?

    Or are the lists that I buy going to be censored with the DNC people taken off of it?

    This makes it difficult to see just who the responsibility falls on. Is it the job of SLOMIN to check who they're calling against the DNC list? Or is it the responsibility of the LIST PROVIDOR to take all of the DNC names off of the list?

    Now I know my company has bought a mailing list to do snail-mail mailings, and we keep that same list around for about a year, and mail to sections of it at different times of the year. Is there now going to be a mandatory refresh time for these lists? Can I only assume a list is good to use without liability for x amount of time?

    For these myriad reasons, I think that prosecution for calling people that are on the DNC list will be next to impossible.

    "well, I got the list from XYZ list co. and they shouldn't have put people on this list that are on the DNC list." - Lawyer A, ANYTOWN USA representing Acme Cold Calling Co.

    "I just gather information, I can't be responsible for filtering out people that are on the DNC list. This is the responsibility of the people using the list" - Owner of XYZ List Co.

    "Let's sue both of them, AND the DNC list providor, one of them is bound to pay up or settle. And this won't cost you anything unless we actually get paid a settlement" -Scummy Lawyer B, of firm Ambulance Chasers Inc.

    Ultimately, I think that this will spell the end of telemarketing (because of COURSE the phone company is going to realize that this is a great opportunity to charge $10 when you activate new service to automatically get put on the list) and more SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM.....(trails off into Monty Python jingle)

    1. Re:How.... by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      The system is very simple. Joe Schmoe signs up and gets his name on the DNC list. If you are a telemarketer you buy the list from the FTC. You run that list against your database and where there is a match you delete the person. If you don't then you are liable.

      The end. I don't know why you are making it seem so complicated. The FTC won't care where you got your list from. It is the calling company's responsibility to check the list against the DNC list. I would start here for more info - The National "Do Not Call" Registry

    2. Re:How.... by vidarh · · Score: 1
      No, it won't spell the end of telemarketing. These kind of provisions have been required by law for YEARS both in various US states and in lots of countries throughout the world, and yes, people have been prosecuted, but telemarketing still remains viable.

      In fact, in some cases it may reduce costs for telemarketing companies, because the people that tend to sign up for these "do not call" lists are the people who REALLY dislike the calls and that would just waste the time of the telemarketers anyway. So instead of mutual timewasting the telemarketers can call someone else who is more likely to buy instead.

    3. Re:How.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how do I get access to the DO NOT CALL LIST? Is it an internet resource that I have to check on

      Yes. Check the FTC site about the revised marketer's rules.

      This makes it difficult to see just who the responsibility falls on.

      Not really. If you are making the calls, then it is your job to make sure the DNC numbers are filtered off the list, before you call.

      For these myriad reasons, I think that prosecution for calling people that are on the DNC list will be next to impossible.

      The FTC seems to be taking the role of investigating and fining companies that violate the new rules. Consumers don't look they will be able to chase the issue themselves. You can only log a violation complaint with the FTC.

      I can only assume that this means there needs to be a significant number of complaints against a particularly bad telemarketer before the FTC will be prompted to do something.

      Ultimately, I think that this will spell the end of telemarketing

      As much as I would hope for the dying day of telemarketers, I think once the initial bruhaha has settled down that business will return pretty much back to normal. Especially since some of the biggest annoyers (the phone companies, banks, airlines) are exempt from these new rules.

      {Too lazy to create a /. account}

  30. You'll still get calls on Sunday by Cygnusx12 · · Score: 1

    I believe those calling under the guise of a charity or "not for profit" group will still be exempt.

  31. Possible (bad) side effect? by LordDartan · · Score: 1

    It says if you want to sign up for the list online, you need to give them an email address. I sure hope the email address isn't going to be distributed along with the list of DNC numbers, else this is going to be a gold mine for email spammers.

    Anyone have any info on what is included on the DNC list given to the telemarketers?

  32. Hmm... by GreyOrange · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm just glad to know that the telemarkers are not powerfull enough to overide such legistation(plus they probably ticked off quite a few politictions) and that they will be under more control. The one thing that realy ticks me off though is "Some businesses are exempt from the TSR and can still call you even if you place your number on the registry. These include common carriers (such as long-distance phone companies and airlines), banks and credit unions, and the business of insurance, to the extent that it is regulated by state law..."(from ftc webpage)
    and those are the people I am getting spammed by all the time, lousy phone company, I give them money and they harrass me with advertisements of services. I'm not paying to be bothered, just to use the phone. Oh well.

    --

    Insert Witty Remark Here ===>____________________________
    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insert Witty Remark Here ===>_____Witty Remark_____

    2. Re:hmm... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Sure.. they're trying to sell you bullshit. ;)

    3. Re:hmm... by shaldannon · · Score: 1

      hmmm....so do you have any experience keeping girlfriends for more than 6 months that you'd like to share? :)

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    4. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in reply to your flame bait, i am currently with someone for the past year and 10 months

  33. State's lists... by pergamon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I sure hope this is as effective as the one that Indiana has had in place for a couple years now, which apparently will go away when the federal list becomes active. I haven't gotten a single telemarketing call since I was put on the Indiana list...

  34. Can't come soon enough... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    I just wish I could collect a share of those $11,000 fines. I'd retire tomorrow.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  35. Maybe not... by PseudoThink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think they'd be opening a nasty can of worms if the general public had a financial motive to get telemarketers to call them. Scenario: you and a friend get jobs as telemarketers, then purposely call each others houses 50 times a day just to rack up profits from the fines.

    Considering we want this system to actually work (creates potential for a similar anti-spam system in the future), it's probably best to keep the system well-designed.

    1. Re:Maybe not... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Considering we want this system to actually work

      In my book, "work" is synonymous with "drive all telemarketers out of business" and as such giving the public incentive to run sting operations is just fine by me. Not to mention, I get a shitload of telemarketer calls...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  36. the way the half-assed FCC does things now... by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be surprised if they spammed us by email to announce that the no-call list had been set up! Or maybe they'll turn over the day to day operations of the list to AOL or CBS or someone just to make things complete...

    1. Re:the way the half-assed FCC does things now... by clonebarkins · · Score: 1

      It's the FTC, tool.

      --

      "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." -- Ayn Rand

  37. Misdialing by pubjames · · Score: 1

    What about misdialed numbers? It happens. $11,000 could do serious damage to a mom & pop business.

    1. Re:Misdialing by Cnik70 · · Score: 1

      the numbers are dialed by a computer that should have weeded out the numbers that are on the DNC list.

      --
      -Cnik
    2. Re:Misdialing by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      " What about misdialed numbers?"

      If you think you dialed the number for Mr. Jones and got Ms. Smith instead, you say "Excuse me, I must have misdialed." and hang up.

    3. Re:Misdialing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations. You are the dumbest person on slashdot. Anybody who believes that a wrong number is liable for the fine has to be totally mentally challenged. Maybe you should spend less time in the Pub James because you obviously are running low on the brain cells.

  38. Catch 22 by Brad1138 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate telemarketing as much as the next person and am glad to see this list. But I am a satellite Dish installer, I work for a co. that subcontracts for about a dozen different companies. Our biggest client is a telemarketing firm, they probably supply about 25% of our jobs. I would hate to lose that much business. The one thing I repeatedly hear from their customers is "I have been thinking of doing this (get Satellite) for a while now". It seems some people need a push or are too lazy to go the story and check things out.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:Catch 22 by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      It seems some people need a push or are too lazy to go the story and check things out.

      I'm sure these same people will be too lazy to sign up for the DNC list too.

      Don't think about it as losing a pool of people to be marketed to. Think about it as gaining a sucker-list.

    2. Re:Catch 22 by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's your company's responsibility to make sure it has a diversified client base. Your company created that risk and will have to live with it until it gets more business.

  39. Re:Happy Dude [ot] by FroMan · · Score: 1

    Mr. Hanes?

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  40. Business idea by pubjames · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here's an idea:

    1) Buy a big block of telephone numbers and direct them all to a single telephone
    2) Put them all on the "do not call" list
    3) But phone by swimming pool. Sit in pool with cool drink.
    4) Wait...
    5) Profit!

    1. Re:Business idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only is your attempt at humor redundant, it is just plain stupid too. And to make it worse you posted at +1! Actually, I take that back. It is a great idea. I think you should go and do exactly what you said. You just sit there and wait for the $11,000 checks to roll in. You could even hold your breath. At least then we would have one less idiot on this planet.

    2. Re:Business idea by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      That would be great except that the people receiving the calls don't get paid a damn cent for this as far as I know.....the government gets the 11K which will go towards supporting this program.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  41. It's better that is goes to the government. by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That way the government is more likely to enforce the law. If it was up to an individual to enforce it, they would have to spend most of the 11,000$ as attorny fees bringing the telemarketer to court. Not to mention the waste of time and effort. The government on the other hand will go in an all out frenzy after these people, especially after Bush's tax cut, and the government has a lot more power behind it than the average Joe.

  42. Outsourcing by xyote · · Score: 1

    Great, now they'll just outsource all those telemarketing jobs outside the US, since the law will only apply to US telemarketing firms. Is there any job that the US is not managing to lose.

  43. $11,000 Question by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does the victim get a portion of this fine?

    1. Re:$11,000 Question by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      No, but you can sue for actual damages under tort law. And you'll probably get it tripled for punitive damages.

      Of course your actual damages are what, $0.10?

  44. State Do Not Call registries by dsplat · · Score: 1

    A number of states already have their own registries that you can use now. The NY Do Not Call Registry has been up for a while now.

    --
    The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  45. Why not have Ma Bell monitor your phone by lpp · · Score: 1

    IIUC, the baby bells keep records on who calls you and would presumably know the point of origin, even if it doesn't display properly on Caller ID. So why not then offer a *007 service or something. If a telemarketer calls you after you are put on the list, after hanging up, you dial *007 and the previous caller is automatically logged into the system as a DNC violator. For that matter, the telco probably could make sure you really were on the DNC and only offer you the service (for a small monthly fee I'm sure) if you were on the DNC list.

  46. Burns by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    One dollar for eternal happiness?

    Hmmm...

    I think I'd be happier with the dollar.

  47. Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Interesting
    How does this affect someone like myself who owns a small business and makes cold calls as a part of the marketing? I cold call other business people, usually at there place of work, and don't sell anything over the phone, I simply try to get an appointment to meet with the person to talk about their productivity and see how my consulting service might help them. Is there any risk to what I do now? Should I even bother with the DNC list, or is it cool since I'm only calling them at work (doubtful number is on the list) and I'm not selling anything during the call?

  48. Sneaky Telemarketers by psychopenguin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    None of this really matters since telemarketers are already using semantics to find their way around the current rules. I got a call a while back, and started to run through the junkbusters script.

    tele-loser> "Wouldn't you like it if ?"
    me> "Is this a telemarketing call?"
    ...long pause...
    tele-loser> "No sir, this is a survey!"

    See how the new scam works? It's just a survey, but if you really sound interested they transfer you to a sales person for your convenience.
  49. It applies to you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I dont call out of the state...

    From www.m-w.com

    Main Entry: intrastate
    Pronunciation: -'stAt
    Function: adjective
    Date: 1903
    : existing or occurring within a state

    It may be a lame tax, but it does apply to you.

  50. Nice to get good gov't -related news on Slashdot. by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

    I've heard a lot of people complain that this is silly legislation when there are more important things politicians should be spending their time on (and yes that is probably true), but one thing about this that really warms my heart is that this is a bona fide example of elected representatives listening to their constituents wants and acting on it. A lot of things in the U.S. government have sucked lately but here we have a nice example of the system working the way it should.

    Just thought I'd point that out.

    --

    From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

  51. Be nice by avandesande · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I simply say 'I am not interested' and hang up. They do not call back. Believe it or not, you are doing these people a favor, if they really believe that you won't buy anything, they won't bother you again. If you try to be polite or reason with them you are leading them on... These people are just trying to make a buck.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:Be nice by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      You know, what a great idea; just be nice. And you know what? For the past 10 years, I've tried this. I say, "no thank you", or "I'm not interested", and so on, and yet I continue to receive between 10 - 20 calls per day between home and work for tons of garbage I'd never consider buying, especially from a telemarketer. So, after roughly 10 years of being nice with a negative impact, I think it's about time to be nice, then levy an $11,000 fine. If that doesn't work, we'll make it $111,000 fine. If that doesn't work, then it's time to outright ban telemarketing.

      These idiots hide behind everything from symantecs ("oh no, this isn't a telemarketing call, this is a survey") to the first amendment. Hello, folks - the First Amendment secures the right of the people to speak freely; NOT the right to be heard. Nor does it secure the right of anyone to invade the privacy of another in order to exercise that right. Some people pay monthly fees to screen out as many of the telemarketers as possible, while others look to the caller ID for guidance. My problem with that is that I don't know if the "unknown" or "out of area" caller is a family member trying to get through for help. Hence, I'm subjected to the incessant barrage of unwanted, intrusive phone calls that cost me both time and productivity.

      With respect to them "just trying to make a buck", so are cocaine dealers and gun runners. And yet, cocaine dealers and drug runners at least stay out of my home. Can I not expect the same from these telemarketers? If I sign up for calls, ask for calls, or otherwise express an interest in receiving telemarketing calls, I wouldn't complain. But in 10 years, I haven't once asked a telemarketer to call me, I haven't bought a single product, and the situation continues to deteriorate. When I'm nice, they hang up, and they don't call back; until tomorrow. And when they hang up, someone else calls me, and then another, and then another, and then another. It's time to stop.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    2. Re:Be nice by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Uh, did you read what i said? You are being nice by quickly saying 'no thank you' and hanging up (some people would call this rude). You lead them on by being NICE. You are being kind to them by being RUDE.
      Get it?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:Be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've found "Please put me on your don't call list" works nicely. (Don't asked to be taken off a list - they have a fresh list every day.) Even if they don't put you on the list as the law requires, they typically hang up quickly.

  52. What is so hard about hanging up? by dbavirt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand why we need a law about this. If somebody calls you and you don't want to talk to them, just *hang up*. Easy. Simple. No legislation. No arguments over who got the 11k for the offense. No tax payer dollars wasted. And really, you aren't offending the sales drone on the other end of the line. I screen my calls with an answering machine. This technology has been around for, I would guess, decades, and cost me about $50. I have a very short message on it, and everyone who we want to talk to knows that they need to leave a message. I incur ZERO annoyance from telemarketers, unless you count the amusement at having them try to have a conversation with my answering machine.

    1. Re:What is so hard about hanging up? by w3svc_animal · · Score: 1

      I received a call at 7:04 this morning from a guy asking me if I wanted to refinance my house.

      After shaking the cobwebs out and clearing a pack and a half of yesterday's cigarette smoke from my throat, thanked him for waking me and asked to be placed on his company's DNC list.

      He (or someone from the same company) called back three times throughout the day...

      The national DNC list is a good idea in theory, but in practice, there are too many exceptions to the rule to make it worthwhile for any one.

      Now, I did a little research and this is what I found...

      Stopping Telemarketers

      FTC Laws

      More FTC info

      --

      Error encountered in IAWebSig.clsSig.Create: Last Procedure: sPrc_Ins_tblSig

    2. Re:What is so hard about hanging up? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I believe the collective opinion is that people don't want to hear the phone ring unless it's something that requires their time.
      I, for one, don't want to hear the thing ring all day and night - period.
      My local carrier has something called "private Time."
      I'm using it 24/7. It makes sure the phone doesn't ring unless the number calling is on a 5-long "allow list" or the caller knows a two-digit code (entered while ringing to the caller).
      That deals with the problem quite nicely. That is, until a list of IDs starts floating around... but they can be changed.

    3. Re:What is so hard about hanging up? by base3 · · Score: 1
      My local carrier has something called "private Time."

      So let me get this straight. Your local carrier sells telephone service and caller ID cloaking ability to telemarketers, and makes money. Then they sell you a service to be able to avoid their calls, for more money. There's a name for this--extortion.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    4. Re:What is so hard about hanging up? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Oh, I completely agree. Don't get me wrong... It's just a way to avoid (in the short term) the phone ringing unless it IS someone I know or gave my number to.

    5. Re:What is so hard about hanging up? by fendel · · Score: 1

      I don't like being rude; I don't like hanging up on people. Sometimes the alternative is to put up with a lengthy don't-take-no-for-an-answer telemarketing script. I resent it when they make me choose between feeling bad and feeling annoyed.

      There is no pleasant outcome to a telemarketing call. My dinner's been interrupted and I've either wasted my time or incurred the stress of getting mad enough to hang up on some poor slob. So when the phone rings, I hesitate to answer. I let it roll into voicemail. My friends can't reach me promptly. (With voicemail, I can't screen my calls, and besides, most people I know get really irritated when you screen calls with an answering machine.)

      For me, telemarketing is much worse than spam because it takes advantage of your natural human instinct to be decent to people.

    6. Re:What is so hard about hanging up? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If somebody calls you and you don't want to talk to them, just *hang up*.

      Tha hard part isn't hanging up. The hard part is getting up to answer the phone every 5 minutes. It's very frustrating, especigally when the other party hangs-up when you answer.

      I screen my calls with an answering machine. This technology has been around for, I would guess, decades, and cost me about $50. I have a very short message on it, and everyone who we want to talk to knows that they need to leave a message

      Actually, the best solution is to have some sort of password system on your telephone. Just like you can have an email address for every company, I want a 4-digit passphrase for every company that wants my phone number. If I get illegial phonecalls from a company that I did not request, and that cleary violated my instructions, their knowledge of that 4-digit number is proof. Also, just the ability to remove that pass-number would put a stop to most calls. Unfortunatly, I have yet to see such a system (I only see ones that support one passnumber at a time).

      With answering machines, you still have to possibly get up to listin to it, or just the fact you have to pay attention to it is very annying when you get a call every 5 minutes.

      I've had numerous people that called that simply won't talk to an answering machine. Add to that the fact that people you want to talk to can't know if you are there or not, and you come home to hear a message saying "pickup the phone... come on... I'm waiting... Stop ignoring me..." etc.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  53. How to deal with phone sales 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When someone phones trying to sell you something, they usually have a certain amount of time to get through some numbers and make a certain amount of sales. My favourity way of getting my own back is the following .... just say 'hold on a second, there is someone at my door' (or something similiar). Now lay the phone down and continue doing what you are doing. Chances are they will sit on the other end of the phone for a good 5 minutes before hanging up. You have now just wasted their time and they will have less time to call up the next 100 people on their list.

  54. Keep it... it's the only good things about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New provision to require caller ID transmission
    When the amended TSR goes into effect, telemarketers will be required to transmit their telephone number, and if possible, their name, to consumers' caller ID services. While it is technologically possible to transmit callers' numbers nearly everywhere now, transmission of callers' names may not be available everywhere yet. Transmission of callers' ID information will enable consumers to know who is calling. This provision will take effect one year after the release of the Rule.


    Read the rest of the document and then exceptions and you'll see it's pretty crappy. This is the best thing about the plan.

  55. How to make a telemarketer go away by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    When they call & ask to speak with Mr. Stevens, I explain they want the "other Mr. Stevens". As I hand the phone to my son, I tell him to explain all the fun things he did that day, from the detailed slimey booger he picked & where he wiped it, to his favorite & most proud stories about "pooping in the toilet." He is so proud of the shapes he can make. Usually after a few minutes of running around on the cordless phone explaining how proud he was with the details of his day, he comes back & says" they hung up". Imagine the rudeness of some people.....Go figure. More here

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  56. hmm... by Cynikal · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Companies will face an $11,000 fine for each telemarketing call that violates the FTC's new consumer-protection provisions."

    now i wonder if theres any way to extend that to inlaws and ex-girlfriends?

  57. Hidden Law.... by Tsali · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, but in a similar bill passed by the House of Representatives this week, the companies get a $12,000 tax break for each offense.

    (Fiction can be fun...)

    --
    This space for rent.
    1. Re:Hidden Law.... by smart.id · · Score: 1

      (...But I find the reference section a little more enlightening)

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
  58. YOU FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    YOU FAIL IT

  59. Try calls at 11 pm or later by bildstorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem with a lot of telemarketers is that they call at all kinds of odd hours. I mean, if you have friends and family that live carboard cut-out lives and there are never emergencies, you can screen all your calls and be sure to not be woken up. However, I have friends all aroudn the world, and once in a while, they need me at 2 am or so.

    The big issue for me has been the recycling of numbers and fax spammers calling them at any time of night. Combine that with telemarketing calls that are at bad hours because some idiot on the wrong coast pulled up the wrong list, and you're starting to get irked.

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. - G.B. Shaw
    1. Re:Try calls at 11 pm or later by Anthony+Stuckey · · Score: 1

      They don't even have to call at odd hours. For all four years of college, I worked grave shifts. I'd sleep in the evenings. Callers after 5pm regularly woke me up. Asking for their home phone number so that I could return the favor was an offer never accepted.

    2. Re:Try calls at 11 pm or later by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      The big issue for me has been the recycling of numbers and fax spammers calling them at any time of night.

      I used to be in the same boat. Then I was lucky enough to have a land line with the suffix 0015 and a fax line with the same suffic of 0029 (both on the same prefix).

      If the land line would ring at an odd hour (as it often would), I'd wait 2-5 minutes. Typically, during that time the fax line would ring too. In which case I'd pick up the fax line, not allow an incoming signal, and hang up. Voilla! No junk faxes.

      If the fax line didn't ring, I'd then walk over and check voice mail, as it might actually be a real call.

      Of course, in a perfect world, I wouldn't have to do that.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  60. I don't understand organizations fighting this. by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In our state, we recently had a no-call list instituted state wide. The telemarketing groups, of course, fought it tooth and nail.

    What I don't understand, is how they think that they are losing business. If I sign up for the list (which I did), I am stating an unwillingness to deal with a telemarketer already - they haven't lost a potential sale, because there is no way I'd buy from one anyway, and if anything they've saved their call center a bit of time and abuse.

    Even more puzzling are those who choose to ignore the state law and call anyway - like they think I maybe forgot I signed up, or that I'll be so happy to hear about the new windows or whatever they're selling that I'll change my mind.

    Why do telemarketing groups fight something which keeps them from wasting time calling folks who identify themselves as "not interested"?

    1. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by lushmore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do telemarketing groups fight something which keeps them from wasting time calling folks who identify themselves as "not interested"?

      Probably because there are people out there who can't say "no". Some people can be talked into spending money on pretty much anything. These are the people the telemarketers really want to go after. If a person knows they have this tendency, they would be sure to put themselves on the do-not-call list.

      The people who don't end up on the list probably don't know about it, are suspicious about it, or some other reason... not because they WANT to hear from telemarketers. It's not like watching commercials--telemarketing has no redeeming value for the recipient.

    2. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because, in many cases, the telemarketer is getting paid by another company for calls made, even if no sale occurred. Sure, they may get paid more if they make a sale, but if they still get some amount just for making the call, that's still a profit. So it's to their advantage to call you, even though they are pretty sure you won't buy anything.

    3. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      That source of revenue will disappear in due time, once the list is in place and people DON'T buy. Especially from a violator.

    4. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Oh, hush. You're making sense. That has no place is business or government.

    5. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's another angle. If, say, Citibank hires Acme Telemarketing to make calls, then Citibank sure as hell doesn't want to be caught up in any legal morass caused by Acme calling folks on the list, so they may tell Acme that they don't get paid for any calls where the number is on the national list. That way, they cover themselves should Acme break the rules.

    6. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      People who do want the product will seek it out on their own and buy it whether or not telemarketers exist. People who don't want the product and are resistant to hard-sell tactics and won't buy it whether or not telemarketers exist. Thus, the only effect of telemarketing is selling to people who don't really want the product, but are susceptible to psychological pressure tactics.

      That's the dirty little secret of the industry.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    7. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      If I sign up for the list (which I did), I am stating an unwillingness to deal with a telemarketer already - they haven't lost a potential sale, because there is no way I'd buy from one anyway, and if anything they've saved their call center a bit of time and abuse.

      Of course the same argument could be used for making Slashdot ads optional.

    8. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by concept14 · · Score: 1

      Why do telemarketing groups fight something which keeps them from wasting time calling folks who identify themselves as "not interested"?

      I have some professional dealings with the telemarketing industry, and I can think of another reason why the telemarketers are nervous about laws like this. Some of these people are not real reliable about updating their databases, and they're worried about being fined $11,000 for each mistake.

      (By the way, if you know where I work, I'm not speaking for them.)

      --
      Quis metamoderunt ipses metamoderatores?
    9. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ethical logic does not apply to this industry: telemarketing is not all about whether you are interested in their product/service. They also don't care whether you hate telemarketing. It is about extracting money from as many people as possible, and social pressure tactics (bullying) and deceit are how it's done.

      There will be people on the registry who are susceptible to bullying or lying, and the industry wants to preserve access to those people. So by fighting the registry, they are essentially admitting that their industry relies on unethical tactics.

    10. Re:I don't understand organizations fighting this. by RPI+Geek · · Score: 1

      Because if there are so many fewer people to call, the telemarketers will lose their jobs; there won't be any work for them.

      --

      - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
  61. You could try this ... by Bake · · Score: 5, Funny

    You: *Ring*Ring* "Hello?"

    Telemarketer: "Good evening sir, would you be interested in a pre-approved credit card?"

    Y: "Listen, buddy, I'm on the FTC's Do-not-call list. The offense for calling someone on that list is an $11000 fine."

    T: "..... oh ..."

    Y: "Now, I might be able to let this one slide for a special fee of $5000, thus saving you and your company some $6000. Interested?"

    1. Re:You could try this ... by irving47 · · Score: 1

      I can't remember the difference. Is that extortion or blackmail?

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    2. Re:You could try this ... by Jarnis · · Score: 1

      I think it's called 'a good deal' :p

    3. Re:You could try this ... by entrager · · Score: 1

      That would be extortion :)

    4. Re:You could try this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:You could try this ... by haedesch · · Score: 1

      The "X" makes it sound cool :-)

  62. DUMAS- Direct Unsolicited Mail by Manic+Ken · · Score: 1

    Well HELLO!!
    Thanks!! You made me rich guys, I'll set up a website (after I created the asocciation) called, DUM, Direct Unsolicited Mail asocciation society, Where people who googles for "anti spam list" will be able to swiftly send in 5$. They'll prob write it on /. and get modded +5 informative.
    Yours Manic Ken

    1. Re:DUMAS- Direct Unsolicited Mail by Manic+Ken · · Score: 1

      Kids, learn from the parent: CLICK THE PREVIEW!! It can be so embarrassing to be an smartass.
      I better come off that coffie...

  63. You're all wrong. by pioneer · · Score: 1

    am not complaining about a penalty. But why so much for EACH offense [of calling a number on the do-not-call list]? Is $11,000 arbitrary, or is there some reasoning behind it? It just seems like a big contrast with the couple hundred dollar fine at the State level.

    don't listen to the other posts. 11,000 is calculated by an equation like this.

    11,000 x
    (expected number of callers that report them)
    =
    (money made per call on average) x
    (number of calls)

    that number, i suspect, is something like what they have set up. therefore, if a company ignores the list, they can't make a profit because, even though these numbers that are blacklisted are far and few between, if they ignore the list they will be fined often enough to eat their profits...

    otherwise, they'd just ignore the list... a good example of this is car companies who decide based on equations whether to recall cars based on the probability of the crashes and the cost of the settlements (think "Fight Club")

  64. Actually, it CAN work (and does)... by inimicus · · Score: 1

    Here in Colorado, we've had a do-not-call list for about a year now, and I find that it has made a significant impact - now the only calls we get are from charities and (in election years) politicians' support-groups. While I still get 2-3 of those a month, it's a far cry from the 3-5 a week we got before then. Any given offender is allowed three strikes before punitive action can be taken.

    Just telling solicitors that the number is listed on the Colorado no-call list (in the three cases where it's been needed) has gotten them off the line, and never heard from again.

    --
    Internet Explorer was unable to link to the Web page you requested. The page might use standard HTML or CSS.
    1. Re:Actually, it CAN work (and does)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Colorado has an unusually high number of Vietnam Veterans. I wouldn't fuck with those guys either.

  65. Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by siskbc · · Score: 4, Funny
    Damn, my doorbell just rang, I bet somebody wants to witness with me something about their God...

    See, that's where you have fun, with the religious nuts. Have a knife covered with fake blood at the door. Tell them they're just in time to help sacrifice the virgin.

    Or open it wearing an outfit like The Gimp in Pulp Fiction. Tell them they're just in time for "Punishment Phase."

    Or, if you're bald, put on a white robe and try to convert THEM...very calmly.

    Or just point a watergun at them and shoot them every time they try to talk. The madder they get, the more you shoot!

    Or answer the door nude. See if they can look you in the eye as you converse about the finer points of being a Jehovah's Witness. Ask them if their religion bans nudity.

    See, there's lots you can do to get some enjoyment outta them!

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or you could just feed the assholes to lions. It worked for the romans.

    2. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by siskbc · · Score: 0, Troll
      Or you could just feed the assholes to lions. It worked for the romans.

      :)

      See, that's what they WANT, though - if you're a religious nut, you dream of being a martyr. Don't give them the pleasure!

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    3. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can speak from experience (as a religous door knocker) that I don't give a damn if you are going to hell. You can think your all clever at the door, but I just move on and knock on the next one. No sweat.

    4. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Or answer the door nude. See if they can look you in the eye as you converse about the finer points of being a Jehovah's Witness.

      Worked for a buddy of mine. They never came back.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if your "buddy" thinks that they haven't come back because of that, he is a moron.

    6. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but did your buddy clean up the puke from his front porch?

    7. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by domsol · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have learned that there are several possible "polite, yet make sure they never come back" responses, which break out into short and long.

      Short:
      "Sorry, wrong religion"; when they ask which, give them a really foreign one, like Zoroastrianism or Jain or Shinto, then shut the door FIRMLY.

      Long:
      "Sure, wanna come in and discuss the Goddess?"
      Which works especially well on Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses; I've gotten one each at every domicile I've had in MA, and they never come back.

      --
      > My comment can be quoted whenever, wherever, so long as you bloody well provide attribution! >
    8. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you read the Bible, you would know that it didn't work. Remember the whole Daniel and the Lions den thing?

    9. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1
      Reply to everything they say, but answer in either

      A foreign language

      Jibberish

      Elvish, or

      Klingon

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    10. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by siskbc · · Score: 2, Funny
      Reply to everything they say, but answer in either
      # A foreign language
      # Jibberish
      # Elvish, or
      # Klingon

      I dunno man...if you can actually converse in Elvish and Klingon, you have far bigger problems than the JW on your front step.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    11. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I see it, this would only encourage more people to come to your door for the entertainment. Of course it is entertainment at your expense (along the lines of "Hey- lets go see what that one wierdo that smells like cheetohs is going to do today when we knock on his door").

    12. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, if you read the Bible, you would know that it didn't work. Remember the whole Daniel and the Lions den thing?
      It may have worked for him, or it could just have been just another case of religious twits making shit up as they go along "Foolish is the man who does not believe in [insert deity name here]". There are quite a few cases of lions and dogs being quite effective against christian cultists, whose tradition of ritualized androphagy didn't make them popular for quite some time. It's most likely that the lions had had thier fill of christians for the day and were looking for a little variety in thier diet.
    13. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1
      I can speak from experience (as a religous door knocker) that I don't give a damn if you are going to hell. You can think your all clever at the door, but I just move on and knock on the next one. No sweat.



      Odd. You don't give a damn, but you spend your free time doing it?

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
    14. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course, if either of you knew jack about the Bible, you'd know that Daniel wasn't a Christian, since he lived about 600 years before Jesus was born.

      The first century Christians were frequently the victims in Roman entertainment venues. Being torn apart by beasts was just one of the ways they could've been killed. Sometimes they were forced into gladiatorial matches. Untrained and unwilling to fight, the Christians were mincemeat within minutes.

      And as for all of the people that say "do this-or-that to freak out or otherwise ensure that JWs will never come back," all I have to say is, "HAH!" It doesn't work. As a JW, I can tell you that it will never work.

      We check out territories from a library maintained by the local congregation. The territory I check out this week may have been checked out by someone else last week, worked through, then turned back in. I won't know that you've come to the door naked or with a fake knife or any other stunt you've done. The only surefire way of getting us to stop calling at your door is to *ask us not to come back.* We maintain "Do Not Call" lists with every territory in that library, and we respect those DNC lists. Once a year(at the most frequent, usually more like every 2 or 3 years), someone will check back to make sure you haven't moved or that you haven't changed your mind.

      I don't know about other faiths that go from door to door, but I know with Jehovah's Witnesses, a do-not-call list is a non-issue. Just ask. And note that "I'm not interested" or "I have my own religion" is not the same thing as "Don't call back at my house. Write it down. Go away."

    15. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by teslatug · · Score: 1

      Or I don't feel like being a sadistic bastard and simply tell them I am not interested

    16. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, when I was on a Mormon mission, all you had to do was say "I'm not interested" and I would wish you a nice day and walk away. What is so hard about that?

    17. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah: Just Hit Delete.

      Just politely ask every wacko who knocks on your door to leave you alone, and some of them actually won't come back! Not that the stream of wackos will end, but you can sleep easy knowing that particular one will not bother you any more. Maybe. Oh, joy!

    18. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by rhfrommn · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who did something like that. He was a monster too, 6'6" and well over 300 lbs. His high school football coach benched him for injuring too many opposing players he was so big and strong. One day he noticed the JWs working his block and prepared a suprise.

      He shut out all the lights and lit a bunch of candles. He grabed a 6' long decorative sword off the wall. Put on a full length black hooded robe. When they rang his doorbell he ripped open the door, looked down on them, and screamed at the top of his lungs "ARE YOU HERE FOR THE SACRIFICE?!?"

      They dropped their crap on his doorstep and took off at a full run. He's never seen them again.

      --
      My motto is: Never give up - unless it's harder than you want it to be.
    19. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so hard about that?! You interrupted me during MY time. I have to drop whatever I'm doing to go and answer the door, and to see someone I don't know, which puts me automatically on guard. I don't know if you're here to spout religious mumbo-jumbo or pull a gun on me. Then I have o abhor all my teachings on how I should treat my fellow man, and act rudely to get you to leave (sorry, Bub. No sale today).

      Not everyone is like you. Very few salesmen will take the short answer and leave. It's a sales tactic; the salesman will invest a lot in the transaction, often forcing you to sit/listen/wait, and it is time that can never be returned. So now I want my time back, or at least make the time you're taking from me as mine to do with however I please.

    20. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long:
      "Sure, wanna come in and discuss the Goddess?"
      Which works especially well on Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses; I've gotten one each at every domicile I've had in MA, and they never come back.


      You know, Mormons knock doors for two years straight. It takes about 3 days for them to have heard it all. If you really didn't want them to come inside--well, you're lucky that they were in a pragmatic mood, because if I had been having a bad knocking day, I would have said "That sounds great!" and walked right in.

      And no one keeps track of whether your house has been visited or not, so it's by chance that you haven't seen them.

    21. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know, Mormons knock doors for two years straight. It takes about 3 days for them to have heard it all. If you really didn't want them to come inside--well, you're lucky that they were in a pragmatic mood, because if I had been having a bad knocking day, I would have said "That sounds great!" and walked right in.

      yeap. and then you wonder why people hate nutty cultists running around and knocking on doors. boy, do you have a really low learning curve if you are going to actually say "I am going to come into this person's house and be an asshole because nobody wants to join my cult". Yeap, thanks for proving the best way to remove annoying cultists from your doorstep is with a double-aught.
    22. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Tesseracti · · Score: 1

      I am Jain, and I've tried that. All it did was make them even more focused on 'saving my soul'. They'd come around every weekend. On the rare occasions they'd catch me at home they would remind me how many weeks it had been since I was last home to speak with them. It was kind of creepy.

      So, now I just take their pamplets and shut the door. Its much less work.

    23. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or answer the door nude.

      That might backfire.
      "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." (Matthew 7:12)

    24. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as if "I'm not interested" actually got them to leave. Usually they are trying to shove thier way in at that point, and then you have a steady stream of nutcases ringing your doorbell all trying to get you to believe in thier imaginary friend. Ever get the feeling you AREN'T WANTED? the only thing that seems to work with mormons or jw's is: "Piss off ye bloddy mental wankers! Clear off or ye'll feel my foot up yer arse ye will!" even then (because they are thick) the really slow ones will ask if they can come back later.

    25. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, if either of you knew jack about the Bible, you'd know that Daniel wasn't a Christian, since he lived about 600 years before Jesus was born

      most people really don't give a damn about the minutae of your work of fiction. It's the same if one is trying to shove off a JW or a Star Wars Unwashed Fanboy.
      The first century Christians were frequently the victims in Roman entertainment venues. Being torn apart by beasts was just one of the ways they could've been killed. Sometimes they were forced into gladiatorial matches. Untrained and unwilling to fight, the Christians were mincemeat within minutes

      you say this like it was a bad thing. They should have learned how to fight (especially before setting fire to Rome)
      Personally, I think the Tokugawa had the right idea. "Cross is always followed by the sword" and all.
    26. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to go ahead and raise the bullcrap flag on this story. Who actually believes that some football player just happens to have a full length black hooded robe and 6' sword handy?

      If it is in fact true (doubt it), then what kind of moron friends do you have?

    27. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by siskbc · · Score: 1
      I'm going to go ahead and raise the bullcrap flag on this story. Who actually believes that some football player just happens to have a full length black hooded robe and 6' sword handy?

      They do some strange things to initiate the freshmen, I hear. I would have believed it if he had said a 6' strap-on too.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    28. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if you are that concerned about getting your fat ass off the couch to answer the door long enough to say 2 words, maybe saving your soul shouldn't be your #1 priority. Try wiping the grease off your hands and taking a shower every once in a while first. Or get some sun on your pasty white & greasy skin. Then you can talk about how "precious" your time is.

    29. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its pretty hard to pull stuff like that off. I highly doubt that they dropped everything and ran away. More likely they looked at him like he was an extreme wierdo and he suddenly started to feel very aware of how dumb he looked.

      That is assuming that the story has any truth to it, which is also very unlikely.

    30. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boy, do you have a really low learning curve if you are going to actually say "I am going to come into this person's house and be an asshole because nobody wants to join my cult".

      Well, I only tried that line once, and I just got a funny look.

      More to the point, you might be surprised at how many people can at least get over some of their previous prejudices by getting to know a couple of people they'd never talked to before. Sometimes capitalizing on mockery or sarcasm is what it takes.

      If you immediately categorize anyone in a suit and tie who rings your doorbell as narrow-minded, you probably could benefit from it more than most.

    31. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you immediately categorize anyone in a suit and tie who rings your doorbell as narrow-minded, you probably could benefit from it more than most.

      Anyone who rings my door in the morning on a weekend (save the UPS or the mailman) is considered a pest - the kind that needs a little DDT. People in suits waving works of fiction at me, unless invited, are considered to be significantly less than that. Speaking with non-sentient lower life forms like JW's is about as edifying as talking to mosquitos. Both are annoying insects that suck. Both will pester you, not get the hint that they aren't wanted, and neither will go away until they get swatted.
    32. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by rhfrommn · · Score: 1

      It's true, but of course you don't have to believe me.

      The guy was big time into D&D, thus had the decorative sword on the wall since he thought it would be cool. The hooded robe was from his Grim Reaper haloween costume.

      Whether they dropped their stuff and ran I have no way to verify. But when he told me the story I believed it. Seeing how huge Aaron was, if he yelled at *me* I'd run away . . . .

      --
      My motto is: Never give up - unless it's harder than you want it to be.
    33. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by siskbc · · Score: 1
      "Or answer the door nude."

      That might backfire.

      No, I stand facing them.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    34. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you mention that....

      Just yesterday I was cleaning my AR-15 and my pistol, watching "Full Metal Jacket" at almost full volume. I had the front door open to let the breeze in when lo and behold the ADT Security salesman came to the screen door. I got up and brought the lower receiver to the door and politely told him I didn't need a home security system. He said "Yea, I bet you don't you do" as he turned and walked away quickly.

    35. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Who actually believes that some football player just happens to have a full length black hooded robe and 6' sword handy?

      Who believes some weak, pasty, geek would have a 6' sword and a black robe? I personally know a few, and Jock & Geek aren't mutually exclusive.

      Plus, when you have a few thousand people posting, you'll find some personal stories that not everyone will see in their lifetime.

    36. Re:Come on, the religious nuts are FUN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or a MORMON! LOL!!!!!!! jfkdlsajfksd

  66. DO NOT CALL ME! (Corrected version) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    evar!!!11 I H8T PHOEN CALS!!!!211 ALLO F THEM!!!!!11 especaly pesky TELLEMARKETARS!!!!111 THEY ARE TEH SUCK!!!111 If yu call me i will hunt u down I SWAER IT!!!111 BY TEH POWAR OF GREY SKULL ILL KICK UR ASS!!1111 and dont think cuz i made heman refference i cant kick ur ass i could totally kick ur ass even while watching heman and chewing beef jerky

  67. Re:It's the damned liberals, at it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll never find me!

    I think they already did, and gave you those magic eyeball transplants.

    Hint: this isn't the FCC.

  68. Dump your land-line! by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

    Don't pay the phone monopoly. Get yourself a mobile phone. 90% of the US population lives in a well covered area. At least there is some reasonable amount of competition in the mobile phone biz. My phone bill is now less than what it used to be with a Qwest/USWorst land-line. Plus I get tons of nifty features that my land-line never had.

    I never get phone spam on my mobile. I've been land-line free for four years now.

    And paying the phone company $5 to block phone spam is giving in to racketeering. They are the ones selling your phone number to the phone spammers. And, yes, it should be illegal.

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    1. Re:Dump your land-line! by nherc · · Score: 1
      Interesting... that would make a good Ask /.

      Wired vs. Wireless Phones, Is Wireless a viable standalone option.

      I may look into it although I use the land line now for DSL, which would go up if I didn't use their telephone service.

      --
      'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    2. Re:Dump your land-line! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Problem: That works up and until you live with someone, then it's just a major pain and expense.

    3. Re:Dump your land-line! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sprint has 2000 nationwide minutes for $100, includes two phones (shared minutes), plus other stuff like everyone else has, n+w, phone to phone etc.., includes unlimited messaging, internet access through the phone (no minutes and no data charge) and cheap internet access to use the phone as a gateway for another device via USB cable.

      For an extra $10/month you get unlimited roaming (Free and Clear America Plan). YMMV with the PCS coverage areas.

    4. Re:Dump your land-line! by Davak · · Score: 1
      Looked into this a while ago... (Of course, IMHO)

      Reasons not to switch to cell-only:
      1. 911 - Land line 911 is currently the only system available that the cops can find you just by your dialing.
      2. Alarm Systems
      3. Modems/Fax Machines
      4. Tivo/Cable Boxes requiring land line

      Currently, the 911 service is the only thing that I can't work around. I HATE our landline company... and we have no other landline company that serves our area.

      Davak
    5. Re:Dump your land-line! by nolife · · Score: 1

      When I moved into my house, the phone service was off but I was still able to plug in a phone and dial 611 and get my service started, would 911 work also? I'm sure our tax dollars are already paying for it somehow.
      I assume every neighboorhood is wired and connected differently so YMMV.
      To bad you could not register a cell phone with your local 911 office, or E911 was not more widespread. Then they could assume you were home or pinpoint your location. Better to drive to your house looking for you then driving around in circles wasting thier time or worse for you, not doing anything because they do not have enough info.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    6. Re:Dump your land-line! by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1
      I also have wireless broadband internet access through Mesa Networks in Colorado.

      If your only broadband option is DSL, then you might as well keep the land line. Otherwise, please don't feed the Baby Bells.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    7. Re:Dump your land-line! by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1
      "That works up and until you live with someone, then it's just a major pain and expense."


      Care to elaborate on that a bit?


      When I first dropped my land-line, I lived with my GF. Each of us got a mobile phone. The family plans that most mobile phone companies provide are quite reasonable. The charges when I first signed up were no more than $10/month more once long distance charges were factored in, and the prices have come down considerably over the past four years since that time.

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    8. Re:Dump your land-line! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Verizon landline: $40/mo with the bells & whistles
      Verizon family plan (2 phones) $70/mo

      I have both a landline and a family plan, but if I didn't need a cell phone, I'd go with the cheaper solution. Where do you live that you only pay $10 mo?

      Another reason for a landline is the peace of mind issue. If the power goes out, your phone still works. With a cell phone, your phone will last as long as your batteries last.

      If anyone has to call your home and reach someone other than you, the one phone that's virtually guaranteed to work 100% of the time is the landline. Not everyone that visits you will have a cell phone.

      In my opinion, a landline is an "always on" solution that requires no effort, while a cell phone is a "mostly on" solution that requires upkeep (keeping it charged).

    9. Re:Dump your land-line! by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 1

      The clincher for me is:

      5. Cellular network availability in times of crisis.

      Remember 9/11/2001? Here in DC, it was practically impossible to get a cellular call through because of network saturation as everybody called their family/friends to make sure they were ok, business contacts to cancel meetings, etc. Meanwhile, calls between landlines went through just fine.

      As far as I'm concerned, a phone whose reliability is inversely proportional to the urgency of my need to use it isn't ready to replace my land line.

    10. Re:Dump your land-line! by nolife · · Score: 1

      You know, I seem to remember the opposite. I was at Dulles airport (worked there at the time) and the only way I could contact my family was via our Cingular phones, although not perfect, it was much better then the regular phones. Maybe the saturation we had with the regular phones was limited to that area of VA.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    11. Re:Dump your land-line! by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 1

      Hmm. That's interesting; I was in Friendship Heights and assumed the situation there was the same throughout the city.

  69. Just Imagin by hrieke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone doing the US a favor by writing a program that would use the web to solve this issue by signing up everyone!
    By using the phone company's tools against them- maybe using a PHP program, we could lookup a number in an area code on the online Whitepages, screen scrape the data to fill out the form for the FTC & States.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:Just Imagin by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Of course, by doing so you'd be committing a federal offense.

      More power to ya if you feel like risking getting your ass thrown in federal prison.

  70. Re:Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by BCGlorfindel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To my knowledge the do DNC list applies to automated dialing services, so as long as your dialing the businesses by hand there should be no problem.

  71. Re:Why $11,000?- money talks. by Manic+Ken · · Score: 1

    GG, glad you enlightened me, I was so confused to as the question mentioned in the parent post. If I could I would mod your post to +5 insightful, it's already modded +4 at this very moment.
    Enlightened

  72. force them underground by savetz · · Score: 1

    This law is generally a Good Thing but the problem is it will force the most virulent telemarketers undeground. They'll still call, but will make it extraordinarily difficult to find out who they are. They'll call from other countries. They'll rely more on prerecorded announcements. They'll create non-profit front organizations to do their calling for them. They'll learn from the spammers.

  73. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  74. that right already exists by DiveX · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 already provides a private right of action where you can collect $500 per violation with there often being more than one violation per call.

    --
    Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
  75. FTC -10, FCC-0 by pileated · · Score: 1

    Well at least some regulatory agencies seem to have the public good in mind.

    1. Re:FTC -10, FCC-0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTC is not a regulatory agency. It is a government sponsored consumer rights agency. The FTC and FCC are entirely unrelated. It is only a simpleton who compares the two based on the similarity of their initials.

  76. Gigantic Loopholes by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are several groups that don't have to abide:

    Long Distance, Airlines, and Insurance companies that are regulated by states and not Fed.

    Organizations you have an "established business relationship" with.

    Companies you've made an inquiry to or sent an application to (for three months).

    Charities

    Political parties.

    Between the shake down by the local Police charities, all those contractors with some nebulous relationship to Sears or my mortgage company, the annual cycles of recorded messages by political candidates, and the phone companies checking to see if I want to switch, its unlikely that I will see any reduction in calls.

    --
    Sleep is for the Weak
  77. Poor telemarketers without jobs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eliminating spam will most certainly kill a market, and cost a jobs.. However, it is being done because our society will benefit greatly from this.

    The same thing will happen to the software industry.

    Some people here love to deny the power and importance of the GPL, but those people are also the ones who don't want to part with the idea of selling bits of data for ($100 * n). They also believe that Microsoft's disdain and open campaign of the GPL is merely coincidental, and at the same time they believe that it's a *good* thing that Microsoft and Apple *like* the BSD license.

    Don't listen to these people, who Slashdot appears to have more than its share of. Free software is the future (ok, somewhat distant) and once the entire world is involved in its advancement, most of society (minus the pro-monopoly crowd, who would give anything to have Bill's bank account) will benefit greatly.

  78. My Answering Machine... by RPI+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... does all the work for me. Here it is:
    Machine: "Hello?"
    I just let the people talk until they realize I'm not actually on the phone. One time this telemarketer called - one of the ones that just start talking at full speed and don't let you interrupt - and talked for 3 or 4 minutes to the machine whlie we sat and listened while eating dinner. After she had finished talking she asked, "so all I need at this point is to verify that you are over the age of 18... Hello?.. If you don't want to talk just f***ing hang up!" - click.
    I only wish I had saved the message to call them back and tell them how their foul-mouthed representative had raped my virgin ears and that I would never buy anything from them :)

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    1. Re:My Answering Machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      <tod voice>"Ow, my freaking ears!"</tod voice>
  79. Ask them if they mind if you record the call.. by Torqued · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've started doing this lately when I've gotten a telemarketing call.. A few of them were really caught off guard by it. Most have just hung up the phone.. no one has said "yes" yet! :)

  80. Who isn't covered? by Skjellifetti · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What effect will this have on academic research in the social sciences that uses telephone surveys? Will these still be legal? How about market research calls such as the call I got yesterday about my radio listening habits? Are these still legal? I do know that the list does not cover political calls or calls from non-profit groups, but what else is not covered?

    1. Re:Who isn't covered? by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      academic research is not marketing, unless they're researching the best way to ask alumni for money.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    2. Re:Who isn't covered? by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      Depends on how they wrote the reg. If it is based on a definition of tele-marketing as any series of calls where the length of the series is larger than N unless the purpose of the call is X, Y, or Z, then academic research better be listed as one of X, Y, or Z if the research requires a sample size greater than N.

  81. "Out of court settlement" by wayne · · Score: 1

    Actually, it would be neither blackmail nor extortion, it would be an out of court settlement.

    --
    SPF support for most open source mail servers can be found at libspf2.
    1. Re:"Out of court settlement" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up as either funny or interesting, though I think it'd probably be the former, since it's the government taking legal action against the telemarketer, not you, therefore, you can't settle.

  82. Re:Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So you're the guy who keeps calling me. Here is a hint - I only put my business card in the bowl at COMDEX to get the free t-shirt. I am not really interested in your product/services.

  83. Make money from home.. telemarketers call U! by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    That exceptions list is rediculus...

    Thost make up most of the calls I get... Politicians "Jews for Jesus", and other stupid stuff!

    They aren't special... should be included to.

    The only one that sounds legit is "bought/leased service in the past 3 months"... that has purpose.

    The contact one is BS too... you know how many are going to sneak stuff on the web in hidden forms, etc. to get you to agree to let them call you?

    I can just see the "Make money from home... let telemarkets call you!" campaigns start.,

  84. You Can't Handle The Truth by mobileskimo · · Score: 1

    Why are they making this a fine instead of a small claim (follow the money)?

    [1] Someone got paid big time for pushing this through
    [2] Someone will get paid for collecting on this
    [3]

    If they REALLY wanted this to stop, you DO give an incentive to abuse the anti-spam anti-telemarketing laws. Placing the burden on corporations to keep a hawkeye on its operations so that it either does no telemarketing or does so with very stringent procedures is the solution for the people. This solution thats been implemented is for a handful of people making a handful of dollars.

    But none of us REALLY want it to stop.

    --
    "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
  85. Re:Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
    LOL. Funny post. And as someone who has my home and cell on the New York State DNC allready (I hate those calls) I still make them biz-to-biz. Yeah, double standard. I'm a bastard.

    Believe it or not, those business cards are acctually gold for a small business like myself. After a local trade show in NYC I tend to average about 200 cards. I will call all of them and for every 10 people I reach, I make one apointment. So out of 200 cards, that's 20 appointments. Out of 20 (these are standard sales numbers and seem to match my numbers too) 8 will cancel for whatever reason. I will see 12. And 1 out of 4 appointments will buy. Then one of those will cancel. So that's THREE GOOD SALES from 200 cards. At $1000 per sale (per-diem consulting) that's $3000 sitting in the fishbowl of cards. So yeah, YOU are not interested, but out of 200 people three suckers^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hpeople are! :)

  86. The absolute worst telemarketer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are Jehovah Witnesses. Not only do they knock on your door but now they actually call around to try and convert people into their cult. Very weak!

  87. Calling from Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Conversely, many companies are moving or using call centres in Canada.

  88. Re:Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by rtaylor · · Score: 1

    End result is that if someone has taken the time to be put onto the list, odds are fairly good they're not going to buy anything or wish to talk about how they can spend their money on the phone.

    However, it looks like it only affects the number you are dialing. It's a do not call # list, not a do not call NAME list.

    I'd be checking the list regularly just from an efficiency standpoint. Those not on the list probably have better odds of buying something than those who are.

    --
    Rod Taylor
  89. Call screening? by medscaper · · Score: 1
    I wouldn't feel safe not answering all of the "Out of Area" and "Unknown" calls... who knows maybe it's your wife from a pay phone after her car broke down.

    Just out of curiosity...don't most people have an answering machine that lets them screen their calls? I mean, if my wife actually has trouble in her car and calls me from a payphone, I'd guess she'd leave a message that starts out, "Pick up, it's me."

    Why would you not feel safe not answering calls? Just screen them.

    I have an uncle who has been screening-only all his calls for 15 years. They simply don't answer the phone. It rings once, the answering machine picks up, and you start rambling some witty shit about them never answering their phone.

    Works like a charm, and those who don't know them don't leave messages. Those who do, and with whom they want to talk, get an answer. They shut off the machine during meals and movies. I think it was smart, and saves them enough to buy a pizza once a year for what they'd have spent on Caller ID.

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  90. Re:Why $11,000?- money talks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was your old account modded into -1 territory, so you had to create a new one for your silly flames? I've looked at what your written over the last few days, since you started using Manic Ken, and you're a special kind of guy. I'm sure cmburns69 will have a real hard time recovering from your attack.

  91. Please do not. by autechre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you abuse this system, then you will be giving ammunition to the telemarketing companies, possibly resulting in the list going away. I, for one, will be more than happy to simply add my own number to this list and be done with it. Let everyone see that it works exactly as intended.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    1. Re:Please do not. by liposuction · · Score: 1

      Oh yes please! Because the U.S. Government is SO well known for it's projects that work the way they were intended.

      Have you seen the state of public edjucation lately?

      I say auto-sign everyone up.

      --
      "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
  92. Calling from other countries... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    There is some talk about getting other countries to sign on to this. Canadia and Mexico would be best bets to start, and you move outward geographically from there. Make it part of NATO doctrine, and as a requirement for China's continued favored nation status. Tie it into anti-spam legislation for a combined assault on the bandwidth wasters.

    Eventually we'll push all the telemarketing centers into terrorist nations that won't sign up to the list. The terrorists would then slaughter the telemarketers for their evil capitalist ways, or for just being annoying prats. And if that's not a goal worth working toward, I don't know what is. :)

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  93. Old news/semi-dupe by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Original article is here. In short, this is nothing new, and even in March the signups would have happened on or around July 1.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  94. Re:Why $11,000?- money talks. by Manic+Ken · · Score: 1

    Well I kind of agree with you, I have been an ass today. BUT, the really silly comments here seem to get modded up. I promised myself not to write or moderate any moore, since it's futile, but...well...ehhrr..
    All I want is that people at least check up stuff before they moderate..as for stupid comments, myself is guilty, but as I said, when one moderates one should take some responsibility IMHO, hence my rantings.
    Yours, not anonymous(well kind of)
    Manic Ken

  95. No Solution. No Problem. by mobileskimo · · Score: 1

    Spam is not unlike that methodology. Opinions and general public sentiments may lie, the numbers don't, people want to be spammed, they want these things and they buy these things. The root of the problem is how to connect a buyer and seller of different degrees together for a transaction without impacting a million others that don't. The methodologies we have today work on the lowest common denominator of human communication. This species is also developing an epidemic problem with attention span that make pop-ups and bright-colored e-mails attractive (Homer-like-sound "mmmmm"). Is it possible, and how, without socially undesirable side-effects such as spam and telemarketing?

    However none of these theories discern between a legitimate business spamming you and a clear social pariah offering penis enlargement or investments in Zaire.

    And yes, I did not forget that in some conditions, sellers may lay influence to someone who was not a buyer before. Ethically and morally, I won't offer my opinions. Just something to think about.

    --
    "Last one in is a rotten goblin!" - Kepp
  96. Re: My own experience by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1
    That's odd. Once I hear the beginning of a statment like "Our fries are especially hot and crispy today," everything else they say just sounds like bleating to me.

    Seriously, there *is* a price to suggestive selling (as well as other annoying sales practices). If done unobtrusively, and if the salespeople respond appropriately to my complete lack of interest, fine. But if they don't, it annoys me, and that really does become a factor in whether or not I will buy from a particular place.

    To be fair, places that annoy me with suggestive selling usually annoy me with their other sales practices...

  97. Charitable Organizations? by andyrut · · Score: 1

    How would non-profit organizations (animal humane society, volunteer firefighters, etc) who call for donations be affected by this law? I worked for a humane society during its pledge drive, and part of it involved cold calling people out of the phone book - many of whom did not want to be called and gave me the same responses I give to telemarketers who harass me.

    Receiving a call for donations may be as equally annoying as a telemarketer to some people, but does it qualify as such?

    1. Re:Charitable Organizations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Receiving a call for donations may be as equally annoying as a telemarketer to some people, but does it qualify as such?

      Yes stupid, it qualifies as just as annoying.

  98. Do not call at work? by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I get phone calls daily from people trying to get me to sign up for trade journals and people trying to get me to sign up for their credit cards. It's a big time waster. Questions is, would this do-not-call list work for a business? Or would that somehow mean that other legitimate but unsolicited calls would not be allowed? For instance, a semiconductor company rep that is just calling to check up on things.

  99. Re:Happy Dude meets Sorry Dude by ketamineX · · Score: 0

    Over the first portion of the end credits is the auto-dialer, playing a new tape of Homer's voice.

    Hello, this is Homer Simpson, a.k.a. Happy Dude. The court has ordered me to call every person in town to apologize for my telemarketing scam. I'm sorry. If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, send one dollar to Sorry Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. You have the power.

  100. Relyea's Algorithm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My computer listens to the caller-id information. If a call shows up as out of area, the computer picks up the phone, sleeps a second, then hangs it up. It also notes the time .. if another call comes within one minute, it lets it through.

    True, the phone rings once for the telemarketers (sigh), but I don't bother getting up until it rings again. The one-minute trick (from my friend Bob Relyea) is for the occasional "real" out-of-area phonecall: when a person hears the remote phone ring once and then gets disconnected, they usually say "that's weird, I was disconnected" and they redial. Wardialers just move on..

  101. Solution... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    I believe the collective opinion is that people don't want to hear the phone ring unless it's something that requires their time.
    I, for one, don't want to hear the thing ring all day and night - period.
    My local carrier has something called "private Time."
    I'm using it 24/7. It makes sure the phone doesn't ring unless the number calling is on a 5-long "allow list" or the caller knows a two-digit code (entered while ringing to the caller).
    That deals with the problem quite nicely. That is, until a list of IDs starts floating around... but they can be changed.

  102. Re:Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    "So you're the guy who keeps calling me. Here is a hint - I only put my business card in the bowl at COMDEX to get the free t-shirt. I am not really interested in your product/services."

    Comdex spam is the worst. I kept opting out of the 'key3media' marketing lists but the e-mails kept coming anyway. Eventually, I went to the key3media site and found a page with the e-mail addresses of everyone on the comdex marketing team. I sent a huge 700K image with nothing but the word 'remove' cc'd to every member of the team. Then the spam stopped ;-)

    This has worked with various other businesses spamming me as well. The moral of the story is that one 700K message is worth more than 700 1K messages.

  103. This is the greatest news ever!!! by lawaetf1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seriously, I can't think of a single thing that the government has done in the last year to improve quality of life as much as this new reg. The only sad part is that there are going to be those who won't hear about this for years to come. Any millionaires want to sponsor The Last Call to inform Americans about this new option? It'd be an ironic gesture, sure, but it'd also be the noose around the neck for these irritating parasites, may their stomachs roast in Hell forever!!

    --
    CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    1. Re:This is the greatest news ever!!! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I can't think of a single thing that the government has done in the last year to improve quality of life as much as this new reg.

      Well, they invaded Iraq and sent gasoline prices from $2.00 to $1.30. That improved my quality of life a hell of a lot more than this DNC list will.

      Don't forget, this law doesn't apply to businesses which don't make interstate calls, and doesn't apply to "long-distance phone companies and airlines, and insurance companies operating under state regulations." It's a good law, but it's not great. In fact, depending what information I have to give the federal government to get on the list, I probably won't even bother signing up for it.

  104. Re:Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by Snowdog668 · · Score: 1

    If you only cold call businesses that leave a card then I'm ok with it. My beef is companies that use the "shotgun effect". I'm in a weird position at work. I'm IT, so I get all of the IT/Telecomm sales calls forwarded to me. I'm also closest to the front door so I get to deal with every salesman that walks in off the street trying to sell us something (small office, no receptionist). I'm amazed at the things people are trying to sell me. Do companies really buy T-1 connectivity or $50,000 printers from someone that just walked in off the street? Luckily we have a "no business with cold callers" policy so I just take their business card and send it to file 13 once they leave.

    --
    I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
  105. Create specific legal forms of advertising. by kaltkalt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And ban the rest.

    We should only allow advertising to be done in certain places/manners. For example print ads in publications of general circulation, television commercials, product placement in places that consent (presumably for a fee), billboards, vehicular ads (bumper stickers, airplanes towing signs), banner (but not popup) ads on websites, and... that's all. All other forms of advertising, especially "direct marketing," should be illegal, and punishable by prison terms. Their annoyance outweighs the value they provide society. I yearn for the day that the Direct Marketing Association is a criminal organization, delegated to the likes of NABLA.

    Commercial speech can be highly regulated, so as long as the message (buy my product!) can get out, there's no first amendment problem per se.

    If I have not asked you about your product, you have no right to tell me about it. If it's good and I want it, I'll find out about it and possibly buy it. Word of mouth is the only truly legitimate form of advertising.

    I concede that I'm quite radical on this issue. I despise all marketing. As Bill Hicks said... if you are in marketing, kill yourself. ("ooh, he's going for the anti-marketing dollar, clever!")

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  106. Still does by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    So the way it's set up it will create an enormous incentive for the government to make false and misleading accusations against telemarketers in order to get the fine money.

    The government is also made up entirely of people, you know.

  107. Before you sign up - check the exceptions by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 3, Informative

    Section 310.6 in the original rule has a page or so of exception clauses, and they are cross-referencing and unclear, but charitible organizations such as religions and your local FoP chapter will be exempt. If these exceptions are anything like the exceptions in my state's do-not-call list, signing up will just put you in EVERYONE's marketing database.

  108. You CAN stop them. by jridley · · Score: 1

    Every time this comes up, people say there's no way to stop them. I have stopped ALL the junk mail and telemarketing calls to my house. It is NOT hard.

    Send your opt-out to the Direct Marketers Association. IT DOES WORK, it just takes about 6 months for the list to get updated. I did it and I get ZERO junk mail now.

    When a telemarketer calls, use the following script:

    You: What company are you calling in behalf of?
    TM: ABC company.
    You: Do you personally work for ABC company, or for a telemarketing firm?

    If TM says "ABC company" then say "Please put me on your do-not-call list."

    If TM says "A telemarketing firm" then say "I would like to be put on the do-not-call list for all of the companies that your company represents."

    Almost every time, the latter will happen. This gets you on hundreds to thousands of do-not-call lists in one fell swoop.

    Keep records by the phone. It's not hard, just have a small spiral notebook, write down the time and date and company name when you ask to be put on the do not call list.

    NOTE: NONE OF THE FOLLOWING WORKS AT ALL, EVER:
    Please don't call this number anymore.
    No, thank you.
    Profanity
    Hanging up
    Saying anything except for the magic phrase "Please put me on your do-not-call list"

    IT WORKS. I do not get telemarketing calls now, and haven't for a couple of years.

    If you want to really kick them in the pants, then request a written copy of their do-not-call policy. They are required to send it to you and it's a major pain in the butt for them to do so.

    Spam is another matter. Spammers are just lowlife M****rF***ers. They will not stop. For them, I like spambayes.sourceforge.net. It works on many platforms and is easier to maintain than rule-based stuff.

  109. +1 Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's your Mod points when you need them....

  110. Telephone Terrorism by vudujava · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I wish I had seen this story earlier.

    I honestly don't believe that this will work simply because telemarketers are getting more and more agressive already and will break other rules in order to conceal their identity.

    For the past two months, my wife and I have literally been terrorized by someone soliciting something. They call our home phone hourly from the hours of 5:00pm to 10:00pm, 7 days a week AND hammer her cell phone as many as 20 times a day. They are always in search of my wife (no, she doesn't have any outstanding bills). She bailed and changed her cell number despite the fact I begged her to work with me to get these bastards. Now they only call my home number and hang up whenever I answer. The always refuse to identify themselves until I verify (or my wife verifies) that I'm the person they're looking for (they want my wife's last four), of course, we've continually refused. These ass-clowns only give first names, claiming under the law that's all they're required to do. They refuse to identify their organization. Refuse to verify or decline whether they have prior business with my wife, and finally, they refuse to say where they got our number. I have repeatedly told them to put my number on their do not call list, and they laugh and often get abusive. It's gotten to the point where I sexually harrass them when they call, until they hang up. Of course, as I've said, they won't talk to me now.

    I'm filing a complaint with my local police department this week (as instructed by SBC who refuses to help me without police intervention - bastards). I'm sure that this won't be the end of this, or telemarketers. I'm dumping my land line once this is over and blocking all unknown numbers coming in on my cellphone (I think there's a service from my provider). Fuck it, I'm white listing everyone and everything. The only phone number I'll put down on any ap going forward will be my local police department.

    1. Re:Telephone Terrorism by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      Are they trying to sell something? If so, pretend to place an order, find out where to send the check, and (assuming it's not a PO box) go there and hurt them severely. Even if it were a PO box you'd get the name of the business and could look it up.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  111. Ironic Banner Ads by BigT · · Score: 5, Informative

    The banner ad I received at the top of the comments page was for telemarketing services and lists. I find this highly amusing.

    --
    Is it weird in here, or is it just me?
  112. Laws are nothing without enforceability by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 2

    Companies will face an $11,000 fine for each telemarketing call that violates the FTC's new consumer-protection provisions.

    They'll only face it if the recipients of the calls can identify them. Since nearly all telemarketers hide from Caller ID, and no violator will willingly give you identifying information so you can report them, the law is completely unhelpful.

    Let me know when the courts pass a law requiring the phone companies to eliminate Caller ID hiding entirely from their networks. 100% accountability for actions. Then we'll be getting somewhere.

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  113. And don't forget ... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Funny

    Y: "Now, I might be able to let this one slide for a special fee of $5000, thus saving you and your company some $6000. Interested?"

    T: "Umm, that was expensive"

    Y: "Well, if you don't have the money right now you can pay it in ten _easy_ installments of only $500 at a miniscule interest rate of 1,25% per month plus fees"

    T: "I'll have to take it up with the manager"

    Y: "Deal now and I'll give you a special price worth $100, deducted from your charge. Special offer, just for you my friend!"

    T: "Oh, really. That's a deal then"

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  114. Entertainment for my Trouble by siskbc · · Score: 1
    You know, when I was on a Mormon mission, all you had to do was say "I'm not interested" and I would wish you a nice day and walk away. What is so hard about that?

    You're the one who woke me up at 10 am on a Saturday when I had a hangover and had been asleep for all of 3 hours, huh? Well, for my trouble of getting out of bed and answering an unsolicited and unwanted trespasser, you're going to entertain me. And the way you're going to do that is you're going to make very strange reactions, hopefully Fear and Loathing, or possibly just crying and screaming, when I do extremely strange and frightening things to you.

    Do we understand each other? Because if not, you can just not knock on my door. You're lucky I'm not one of the crazy bastards from Colorado who just shoot on sight. I'm trying to be a nice guy and not shoot you, but sometimes you have to go and make it difficult.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Entertainment for my Trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the one who woke me up at 10 am on a Saturday when I had a hangover and had been asleep for all of 3 hours, huh?

      Highly unlikely they would be knocking on your door then- usually lots of stuff is planned on saturdays, and knocking on stranger's doors is about the last thing that is on the list. Even so, 10 am is not an unreasonable time. Do you scream at the UPS delivery man when he stops by at 9?

      Well, for my trouble of getting out of bed and answering an unsolicited and unwanted trespasser, you're going to entertain me.

      It is not trespassing- the courts have ruled several times that it is protected speech.

      And the way you're going to do that is you're going to make very strange reactions, hopefully Fear and Loathing, or possibly just crying and screaming, when I do extremely strange and frightening things to you.

      You are giving yourself too much credit.

    2. Re:Entertainment for my Trouble by siskbc · · Score: 1
      Highly unlikely they would be knocking on your door then- usually lots of stuff is planned on saturdays, and knocking on stranger's doors is about the last thing that is on the list. Even so, 10 am is not an unreasonable time. Do you scream at the UPS delivery man when he stops by at 9?

      It's my door, so it's reasonable (or un-) if I say it is. And if I didn't order something, then the UPS asshole better be knocking on my door. If I did, then it sucks to be me. And I don't remember ordering any dogma.

      It is not trespassing- the courts have ruled several times that it is protected speech.

      I'm using trespassing in the general sense, as in, someone I don't want there.

      You are giving yourself too much credit.

      Then come by my house at 10 am and see. ;)

      And sign your damned posts coward.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    3. Re:Entertainment for my Trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is what you don't understand- the people knocking on your door would rather be doing their work a different way. Knocking on a strangers door is without a doubt the least effective way to get people to listen to your message. If they can talk to people that contact them first, or work with people that are referred to them, or work with family members- that is when they are successful. Knocking on your door is the last resort.

      When we knock on a door, we expect that some people are going to be annoyed, some people will be angry, some people are going to make fun of you, and some people are going to try to be clever with pranks. It goes with the territory. Why do we still do it? Because it is more effective than doing nothing at all (although not by much), and I know that the message is worth it.

      So go ahead and scream and yell or try to chase me away with a fake bloody knife if it will make you feel better. It will probably give me a welcome diversion, but it won't keep me from trying.

  115. But how will it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the thing. Let's say I sign up and someone still keeps calling me. If they don't show who they are on CallerID, and if I don't get their name by actually wasting my time and talking to them (which is what I'm trying to avoid in the first place), how can I possibly turn them in to get fined? I suppose I could have the phone company put a trace on my line, but that's kind of a pain, and requires filing a police report first. How is this going to be enforced? What about when directTV has their recorded message call me? What can I do about that?

  116. Re:Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by frankie · · Score: 1
    I cold call other business people, usually at there place of work

    Well, your best option is to RTFM , but the short answer is that DoNotCall only applies to "consumers", aka residential phones. B2B calls should be open game.

  117. Re:Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/alerts/dncalrt.htm

    18. Can businesses sign up for the "do not call" registry?

    No. The "do not call" provisions of the amended TSR do not apply to business-to-business calls. As a result, businesses have no reason to register their telephone numbers.

  118. Fox Again Wins Henhouse Contract by cpeterso · · Score: 1



    Unfortunately, the national do-not-call list will be run by AT&T, who placed the lowest bid for the FTC project. AT&T has also been #1 on the FCC's list of telemarketing complaints for the past three years. Maybe the FTC and FCC should get together and talk sometime..

    AT&T Will Run Do-Not-Call List: Fox Again Wins Henhouse Contract

  119. This is just a big brother database... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine. everybody's current phone number and address. Shouldn't be hard to find anyone now.

  120. that is correct by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Punitive damages should go to the state -- they are intended to prevent the company from doing something again, and so there's no reason the person injured deserves them. Actual damages should of course still go to the person who suffered the damages, but you shouldn't be able to get rich off personal injury lawsuits, for exactly the reasons mentioned in this thread.

  121. Re:Salesmen, speak up! What about cold calling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently, you need to check the laws of the state your calling in. Some allow calling to set up appointments, some don't. Call your local AG's office and find out if you need to purchase the list or not. Pleading ingnorance is no excuse when they come after you.

  122. This works VERY well in the UK by gilgongo · · Score: 1

    There is legislation in the UK similar to this that's been in force for a few years now, and it's VERY effective.

    It's also added a lot of momentum to voluntary industry codes of practice for other media as well, most of which are run by the The Direct Marketing Association.

    A couple of years ago, I subscribed to the DMA's (free) Fax Preference Service in an attempt to cut down on the junk faxes I was getting at home (about 3-5 a day). After about a month, my listing kicked in and I got ONE junk fax about a week later, followed by none at all until we moved house last year. I did the same for our fax at work (getting about 15-20 a day) and it had the same effect. I was pretty surpised, and it's rised my estimation of the marketing industry quite a lot.

    With a bit of luck the same will happen in the States - good luck!

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  123. unfortunately.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this law appears to be so watered down that telemarketers will probably find a way to work around it in almost every case.

  124. Throughput and credibility by Goonie · · Score: 1
    "Our fries are really hot and crispy today. Would you like some?"

    There are two problems with this statement. One: it's too long, and it'll reduce the number of customers the kid can serve. The second is it's not credible - everybody knows that the fries are pretty much the same today as they are every day, so the server will sound sillier than they do already.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  125. WTF? by siskbc · · Score: 1
    I can speak from experience (as a religous door knocker) that I don't give a damn if you are going to hell. You can think your all clever at the door, but I just move on and knock on the next one. No sweat.

    Yeah, that makes sense. I suppose you're just doing it to get with the one JW chick in the country who actually puts out, huh, AC?

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:WTF? by LunarOne · · Score: 1
      Of course, this particular door knocker is unlikely to be one of Jehovah's Witnesses, as they do not believe in hell (at least the fiery torment variety, rather the R.I.P. variety).

      Perhaps he's a Baptist. I had the Junior Pastor from the local Baptist church come by to kindly tell me I was going to a burning, fiery hell if I didn't see things his way. I'm confident that one day, one of us will be proven to be incorrect.

      Really though, a Do Not Call List is more than sufficient; I don't need to show myself a lesser human in the presence of those who sincerely, even if misguided, are trying to help me.

      --

      Read my sig if you like, but I'll never see yours, thanks to Discussions, Viewing, Disable sigs...
    2. Re:WTF? by siskbc · · Score: 1
      Perhaps he's a Baptist. I had the Junior Pastor from the local Baptist church come by to kindly tell me I was going to a burning, fiery hell if I didn't see things his way. I'm confident that one day, one of us will be proven to be incorrect.

      I dunna think so - I was raised baptist, and since we were convinced everyone who didn't agree with us was going to hell, we didn't really make much effort to convince anyone who cared to disagree. ;) I've since become a tad more open-minded.

      But it's kind of confusing - why would anyone who doesn't care about the people they're attempting to save go through the motions? Whenever I do anything that asinine, there's generally the opportunity of poon-tang theoretically involved. That's why I assumed there was a chick responsible. But would that kind of chick put out anyway? Think McFly!

      Really though, a Do Not Call List is more than sufficient; I don't need to show myself a lesser human in the presence of those who sincerely, even if misguided, are trying to help me.

      See, that's where I differ - I have no delusion of my own grandeur - or even of my own reasonable humanity. ;) But I do make sure to keep the fun out of the realm of the psychologically damaging. And hey, I save the REALLY mean stuff for telemarketers. As you say, at least the religious nuts care enough to try to save me, eh?

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  126. Phonezap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I purchased a Phonezap and no more telemarketer ringing through. Peace and quiet finally! http://www.phonezap.com
    Don't order it via the web though, call them and and order it. Their web ordering system sucks big time! It works just as it promised. Need caller ID to work well though.

  127. Typical Telemarketing by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We would like to give you a free edition of the newspaper
    no thanks, get a free one online please remove me from your list

    We would like to replace your auto glass on your windshild
    No thanks, I down own a car. Please remove me from your list.

    We would like to replace your existing windows with vinyl ones
    No thanks I prefer glass. Please remove me from your list.

    But vinyl windows make your home look pretty
    I don't own a home. Please remove me from your list.

    We notice that you recently refinanced your home
    I don't own home. Please remove me from your list

    We are accepting donations for this organization household items
    This is isn't a house, it's a tiki hut. Please remove me from your list.

    We would like to save you on auto insurance
    Don't own a car. Please remove me from your list

    We are accepting donations for this worthy cause
    I don't donate over the phone [isolated cases they get my moolah already] Please remove me from your list

    We want to offer you a free home security system
    Don't own a home, please remove me from the list

    But we can install it in your apartment
    no you can't, I won't let you please remove me from your list

    But there have been alot of break ins in your area, you need one
    Yes, and those breakins those people who purchaced your system

    But why would anyone turn down our free home security system
    Because some people actually make their purchacing choices based on product research rather then impulse buying. Accepting your free product locks the person into a service contract and no one with one gram of sence would do that without doing any form of research. Additional, i'm not going to give license to some guy who I don't know to drill holes in my walls without there being a legit contract for the install. If I choose your service, and you guys fuck up, I want you to pay to have it fixed. You are not qualified to answer any logical question because the company you work for doesn't even give you paperwork or a model number of what you are selling. Your sales staff who will knock on my door are not welcome, I don't want to speak to them. Please remove me from your list, I have not accepted your free product for 7 years. Please give up and find someone else to bug

    I would THINK after repeated failures they would take the hint and actually remove me from the list. I'm not profitable to telemarketers, I don't buy crap sold to me over the phone.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:Typical Telemarketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would THINK after repeated failures they would take the hint and actually remove me from the list.

      You have it backwards. Ask to be ADDED to the "do-not-call" list. It does make a difference.

  128. Get out the old war dialer! by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

    I think you can opt out over the phone. I wonder if you could put everyone in an area code on the do not call list?

    "Hey Boss, I'm done!"

    "What do you mean you are done? That is impossible, I gave you a whole area code"

    "Well, the computer says everyone opted out!"

    Please do not try this at home! I honestly hope they have a way to prevent this from happening, but I could not really explain why!

  129. This is already available by bwhalen · · Score: 1

    At least in California, check out http://www.nocall.ag.ca.gov/

    --
    Where do you want to be, What are you doing to get there.
  130. I worked for a small telco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that offered a service to the telemarketers. our switches would block any outgoing calls that were made that were on the do-not-call list. we obtained the lists from the states that instituted DNC lists.

  131. Shouldn't that be: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Call 303-499-7111 for a standard good time?

  132. Re:Why $11,000?- money talks. by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

    If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen, but your flame is nothing compared to other flames I've seen (like before I used the SIG file and put my SIG in the actual post.. )

    fwooosh!

    Anyway, its not so much that stupid posts get modded up, but the obvious thoughts and ideas get modded up (because everyone says "Of course, the thought makes sense, I should mod it up!").

    But people don't usually try and post the obvious, they just post what they think right off the top of their heads.. And with the moderation system (and community), posting earlier usually leads to higher post ratings.

    Perhaps what is needed is for moderation power to be given out with less frequency. It would force moderators to be more choosey..

    Anyway, nuff said..

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  133. Re: My own experience by vidarh · · Score: 1

    It WILL annoy a lot of people, but that doesn't change the fact that aggressive, invasive selling works better. I've seen the numbers, and seen up close how adjusting sales procedures like this improve sales rates. Yes, you get people who see straight through it, and know what they want, and make up their own mind, but most people don't really know what they want and are trivially easily led to buy more than they planned by a well trained aggressive salesperson.