Slashdot Mirror


Canadians Pay Extra For Their Wireless Hardware

Todd Alivoy writes "Looks like Canadian wireless subscribers have been getting hosed when looking to get new hardware. This isn't the first time Canadian carriers have managed to charge far more than thier US conterparts for the same services. Anyone up there know why? It sure isn't the exchange rates." The linked article shows the price disparity for 14 phones available in both markets.

352 comments

  1. $699 for a phone? A SCO fee? by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does that $699 charge have anything to do with SCO?

    1. Re:$699 for a phone? A SCO fee? by Pakaran2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no... Finland is Lunix... Canada is OpenBSD, idiot.

      I wonder if you can run OpenBSD on a cellphone. the antenna would probably be off by default though...

    2. Re:$699 for a phone? A SCO fee? by mystran · · Score: 1
      Let's see.. in Finland, you usually buy a phone first, then get the carrier separately (although you can get both from the same place if you want). It's a little hard to compare prizing since the set of available phones is different but Nokia 6800 costs about 320e.. which is pretty much the same prize that's listed in the article..

      So this does mean that you pay that prize once, and the phone is forever yours and you can switch it from carrier to another just by swapping the SIM card, right?

      Btw, when cell phones where new, there was this ideology to sell a phone with a given prize only if you took the service from a given carrier at the same time... well.. doesn't happen anymore, thanks to some complaints from people and then a court ruling that it's against local laws.. has probably something to do with the fact that I've never heard anyone have any problems ordering a PC without an operating system but that's another story..

      Now, if someone could just explain the "plan" thing to me once and for all :)

      --
      Software should be free as in speech, but if we also get some free beer, all the better.
    3. Re:$699 for a phone? A SCO fee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. OpenBSD, named after the University of Canada at Berkely.

    4. Re:$699 for a phone? A SCO fee? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Wow...that's interesting. I've never 'paid' for a cell phone in my life. I just got a new Sanyo, with camera and all the goodies. I signed up for 2 years with SprintPCS..which is who I was with before, improved my plan, and no charge for the phone.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. Re:50lu710n by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And that's how you get an easy first post--don't even RTFSummary. It's clear that they're talking about service, not hardware. I blame whoever came up with the title. Leave me alone.

    --
    True story.
  3. $699 American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's $699 American, but in Canadian money that's $9,479 loonies, give or take a couple of dimes with polar-bear-heads on them.

    1. Re:$699 American by smacktits · · Score: 1

      US$699 is still only about 7.40. Behold the mighty Pound!

    2. Re:$699 American by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      You're right.. the queen's head does kind look like a polar bear head.

      However, it's the Bluenose on the back of our dimes and a polar bear on the back of our two dollar coin (or twooney). See for yourself here

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  4. Re:Balance of trade? by Metallic+Matty · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's retaliation for their drug prices

    Nah, the new perscription plan is going to take care of that.

  5. Basic economics... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More competition = lower prices. Less competition = higher prices. (Duh.)

    Also:

    More customers = lower prices. Fewer customers = higher prices. (Less overhead per customer.)

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Basic economics... by Aaron+England · · Score: 1

      No....

      More customers = higher prices.
      Fewer customers = lower prices.

    2. Re:Basic economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      1. Less Competition + More Customers
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

    3. Re:Basic economics... by Fred+IV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly. Also, just because a US consumer pays $99.00 for a phone doesn't mean that the phone costs $99.00. Usually the cell phone company pays a substaintial amount of the handset and tries to make their money back during the life of a contract.

      Heavy competition in the US following Number Portability has set the stage for a messy little price war between carriers trying to win business from each other...great for consumers, bad for the carriers

    4. Re:Basic economics... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      More customers = lower prices. Fewer customers = higher prices.

      Errr...he's comparing the same models of phones. Rogers didn't do R&D to make a Nokia 6800 -- Nokia did, and that cost is shared worldwide.

      In other words for general, worldwide accessible products that reasoning is a deadend.

    5. Re:Basic economics... by Cosmik · · Score: 1

      Oh yes? Then please explain how ISP fees have decreased as more people have been obtaining access to the Internet.

      I hope you aren't looking at some example (eg newspaper prices going up as they become more popular) and mistankingly factoring in inflation.

      More people = lower prices in marketplace.

    6. Re:Basic economics... by Cosmik · · Score: 1

      Mistakingly? I need a break...

    7. Re:Basic economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can choose between four different carrier. What about you? Higher prices have nothing to do with competition but with what people are willing (and able) to pay.

    8. Re:Basic economics... by Aaron+England · · Score: 1

      Because of the competing force of the law of supply which happens to outpower the law of demand in this case with a saturated market of ISP companies.

      More companies = lower prices.
      Less companies = higher prices.

    9. Re:Basic economics... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      The handsets aren't the issue. It's the companies providing you with the handsets (ie, the service providers) that are the issue.

      When I said "More customers = lower prices. Fewer customers = higher prices" I was referring to the service providers from whom you have to buy your phone, not the manufacturer who makes it. The fact that I added the note "less overhead per customer" should have made that pretty obvious.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    10. Re:Basic economics... by Bishop · · Score: 1

      Cell phones in North America are not really "worldwide accessible products" (commodity) as the phones are tied to a particular provider. The wireless provider is selling the phones at a substantial loss[1]. There is more competition in the US allowing US providers to sell the phone for less. The costs for the phones in both markets are priced "as the market will bear." Basically Canadian providers charge more because they can.

      [1] In reality the provider rolls the cost of the phone into the service contract. This charge is hidden to the customer.

    11. Re:Basic economics... by Megor1 · · Score: 1

      A major ecnomic factor to consider would actually be that the Canadian dollar is up 22% this year. The cellular providers would have set their prices awhile ago and arent going to adjust for a currency fluctuation.

      --
      Everyone that disagrees with me is a paid shill
    12. Re:Basic economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      au contraire!

      When one opens up the phone, one discovers that the phone is expensive plastic and solid state protecting the SIM chip that is the unique ID which determines who you are on ANY network.

      Therefore, phones ARE a commodity - ACCESS SERVICE is a price discriminated good. Stupid distinction, IMHO but that's the way it is.

      The phone totally superfluous, I've put that SIM in $1000(US) phone and a $10 throw-away.

      Same service!

      D

    13. Re:Basic economics... by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      Bad for the carriers? Not the ones who come out on top.

    14. Re:Basic economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dead Wrong.

      In EVERY case when competition and the markets are free, more customers = lower prices with very few cases( real estate being one ).

      Unless some government taxes/subsidies/inane laws exist, the market always drives down costs.

    15. Re:Basic economics... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Exactly. Also, just because a US consumer pays $99.00 for a phone doesn't mean that the phone costs $99.00. Usually the cell phone company pays a substaintial amount of the handset and tries to make their money back during the life of a contract.

      Or not.

      The problem with the wireless industry is that there are huge up front capital costs and the marginal cost of an additional customer is essentially zero.

      With competition the price of service tends towards the marginal cost and the carriers all lose money on their investment - but they can still make an operating profit if their cash inflow is greater than their cash outflow. Basically the initial capital investment may never be repaid.

      So what the price of wirless service comes down to is really a reflection on the competative situation rather than intrinsic costs. The prices of the phones were all 'with service' so the price is basically fixed by the extent to which the US or Canadian carriers subsidise the phones.

      Yet another variable is the curency fluctuations. The dollar is currently weak - down from 1.4 $ to the pound to $1.8 with a similar decline in almost every other currency market apart from some in the far east where the countries have been buying dollars to keep their own currencies from rising. The cost of the phone to the supplier will differ greatly depending on when they signed their contract with the supplier and the currency the contract is priced in.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    16. Re:Basic economics... by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1
      Um, no. Did you ever hear of group rates, bulk buying, volume selling, etc? The more customers there are, the more the overhead costs and profit can be divided among them to get the same total. That is, if my overhead costs me $1000, I can sell 100 items at the manufacture cost plus $10, or I can sell 1000 items at cost plus $1, making them each $9 cheaper with no loss to me. That's a bit simplistic, but is the basis for why bulk purchases are cheaper per unit. Then there's manufacturing costs. High volume means using mass production methods, which is cheaper per unit. Low volume means more expensive methods such as hand-building the products.

      Competition means that I should (a) try to minimize my overhead and manufacture costs, and (b) keep my profit modest to keep the price competitive. If I have lots of customers and raise my prices, I'm just making more profit, so a competitor can come in and sell at a lower price with a more modest profit and put me out of business.

    17. Re:Basic economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A system of competition of many companies can
      be less efficient as a whole than a monopoly
      (each company requires sales, secretarial,
      board, etc) so the minimum price that can be
      sustainably offered is higher than might be
      offered by a monopoly. However a monopoly has
      no obvious incentive to reduce prices. So a
      system of competing companies is more likely
      to offer the consumer lower prices than a
      monopoly, subject to that inefficiency cost,
      meaning there is probably a maximum number of
      companies that can lead to the consumer getting
      the best deal. (All assuming no barriers to
      access to markets, start up, etc, etc)

    18. Re:Basic economics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morons, you're confusing demand with economies of scale.

    19. Re:Basic economics... by brightloudnoise · · Score: 1

      This is generally described as a "Cost of Acquisition". Which is why you generally get locked into a contract that is priced to pay off the handset and make the wireless provider some cash before the contract lapses.

      --
      brightloudnoise.com
    20. Re:Basic economics... by Banshee99 · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of GSM/3G phones. CDMA/TDMDA... don't have SIM cards.

      And you are only partially right that you can switch from one phone to another by just swapping SIM cards. You forget that different countries run different bands and different technology.

      Also phones are programmed for a specific network, so swapping a SIM card from an AT&T phone into a Cingular phone will probably not work unless it was reflashed (replace with your countries providers).

  6. A Boot? What about a boot? Oh.... by illuminata · · Score: 0, Troll

    Looks like Canadian wireless subscribers have been getting hosed when looking to get new hardware.

    I don't know what you mean by subscribers, but ham equipment is still a little bit expensive no matter where you're at.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:A Boot? What about a boot? Oh.... by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      That's not a troll! It's supposed to be funny.
      Not very, but still, give him a point for trying! :)

    2. Re:A Boot? What about a boot? Oh.... by neoform · · Score: 1

      .. wasn't funny.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
  7. Routers at a premium but Zoloft on the cheap! by tenzig_112 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps they will set up store-front re-import shops where Canadians can buy cheap wireless gear from the US.

    Some will argue that the US should not be able to get the stuff so inexpensively, that the reduced cost raises prices elsewhere. Others will argue that Canadian research firms put a lot of money into the wireless industry, and price controls would kill the industry.

    1. Re:Routers at a premium but Zoloft on the cheap! by Orien · · Score: 1
      Well, I don't know about all that market speak you just said, but I do no that EVERYTHING is more expensive in Canada!

      It's so bad that even $1.00 costs $1.27

    2. Re:Routers at a premium but Zoloft on the cheap! by critter_hunter · · Score: 1

      They're all selling at a loss anyway. The higher end phones are usually much less subsidized than the lower end ones, but cellular carriers (or at the very least Bell Mobility) sell cellphones at a loss. Since what they are making their money on is the service they provide and not the cellphones themselves, they subsidize the phones people are most likely to buy to make those more attractive, to beat the competition. No point in making a 700$ phone abordable when you can make as much money selling the service on a 338$ phone subsidized to 174$... (which is then lowered to 49$ after a 125$ rebate on a 2 year contract)

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    3. Re:Routers at a premium but Zoloft on the cheap! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Yeah...I heard ya'll actually have to PAY for black CDR's. I find them about every other week here at OfficeMax for free with rebate. Just got another 50 spindle for free...well, ok, postage and tax, but, that's about what $0.50 or so for 50 or 100 packs of them. They also had the 100 pack of slim line cases from free w/rebate. I don't think I've ever paid for a blank CD. Starting a good stockpile of them right now...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  8. Simple by dolo666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Canada is much bigger than the states, but with far less people. The cost of having towers running is a nobrainer.

    1. Re:Simple by Mitreya · · Score: 1
      Canada is much bigger than the states, but with far less people. The cost of having towers running is a nobrainer.

      That is a good point, but what does making a phone have to do with maintaing the service towers? Plus it is always wiser to increase the monthly cost, reducing the shock (maaan, if cell phones here were $500+, I would definately not have one!).

      Maybe the cell phone purchase and plan purchase should be decoupled (as I believe it is in Europe) and then many customer problems would disappear.

    2. Re:Simple by nmos · · Score: 1

      Canada is much bigger than the states, but with far less people. The cost of having towers running is a nobrainer.

      On the other hand, Canada's population is more concentrated in cities so they may not need towers at all in many rural areas.

    3. Re:Simple by futuramarama · · Score: 2, Informative

      Australia has a similar size/population ratio to Canada (and something like 99% coverage for mobiles), and yet it seems our prices are somewhere closer to the US than Canadian ones.

      (I haven't been able to do a proper comparision, since it seems the model numbers differ, but we do get most phones free with plans).

      Besides, the government could easily subsidize the rural towers (rural sector is fairly heavily subsidized anyway)

      --
      "And that solves the mystery of the missing ring" - Bender
    4. Re:Simple by thogard · · Score: 1

      If you get the population data for Australia and the US and remove all areas that have less than 1 person per sq km, it ends up that Australia is much more densly populated than the US in places where its popluated at all. Do the same for Canada and you will find its also more densly if you exclude the areas where no sane busines would ever considering putting a cell tower.

    5. Re:Simple by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Canada is much bigger than the states...

      Only barely, and this comes up in the next point... ...but with far less people

      It's a common misconception of Canada that we're vastly spread out evenly across 10 million square kilometers. In reality the vast majority of us are clustered in a couple of relatively (I mean relative to Canada, although still quite huge compared to most nations) small areas. Outside of this it's sparsely distributed settlements, often related to natural resources, throughout the rest.

      For instance Rogers claims "Our digital TDMA and Analog cellular phone network covers up to 93% of the Canadian population with over 85% digital coverage.". I suspect that 93% of Canadians live in (far) less than 10% of the land mass.

    6. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Coverage is really good in Canada, far better than what it is in the US. I was once 100 km away from the nearest city (100,000 people) and I still had a signal. The nearest town (1000 people) was about 10 km away.

    7. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That is a good point, but what does making a phone have to do with maintaing the service towers?

      Everything. A cellphone being sold with a service package has much of the cost of the phone bundled in the term of the contract. For example, a $50 US phone does not *cost* $49 (or less) - it probably costs much more than $49, but a portion of the cost of the phone is amortized across the term of the contract. Let's say that amount is $10 per month (nice round numbers) for a two-year contract.

      We did that because the phone actually cost us $180. We're going to make $240 over 24 months on the $10 amount, plus the initial $50. While it sounds like we did fine making $290 for a $180 phone, there's a good amount of self-insurance cost (people that break phones and want another without paying the real $180), there's financing costs, and other costs that factor in here.

      Our service rate is $50/month gross, so after phone costs of $10, there's $40/month left for the basic service.

      Here's where the Canada problem enters. In the US, there are many more subscribers per cell - greater density that we can distribute fixed costs (towers, facilities, backoffice, etc.) over a much larger base. Assuming our $50 per month price, the fixed costs in Canada eat up much more of that $50 than they do in the US. This leaves much less room for things like phone internal financing. So we have to charge a up-front price that more closely reflects the cost of the equipment - Canadian customers (we hope) should just be happy to have service.

      I'd personally argue that if they're looking for greater densities, charging a higher nonrecurring fee is a bad way to approach this. High initial costs only prevent people from becoming your customer. But perhaps there are competitive issues in Canada per what the market expects from a monthly rate that don't let them push the Canadian costs into that category.

    8. Re:Simple by futuramarama · · Score: 1

      Good point, but despite the variying density, Australia's network still covers significantly more area per person. It's possible Canada is in the same situation.

      (Australia has a population of 20 million, and a size similar to the US (minus Alaska). The Aus mobile network covers 20% of the land.)

      BTW, this completely ignores the quality of either network, and the density of the networks in the cities as well.

      --
      "And that solves the mystery of the missing ring" - Bender
    9. Re:Simple by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but don't all the people in Canada live within like 2 feet of the US border?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    10. Re:Simple by RedSynapse · · Score: 1

      Ok 80% of us Canadian's live within 200km of the US border.

      Just as there are not a lot of cell towers in the middle of the wheat fields of Nebraska or Death Valley nor are there many found in the Yukon tundra or mountains of British Columbia.

    11. Re:Simple by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      Canada is much bigger than the states, but with far less people. The cost of having towers running is a nobrainer.

      Not everyone who reads /. is from the US - someone should explain it for our Canadian readers. ;)

    12. Re:Simple by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Outside of Toronto, and maybe the Montreal-Ottawa area, it's true though. At least when you compare to the US. Once you get past southern Ontario, you don't hit another city of > 500,000 people until Winnipeg, and that's ~2500 kms away. Another ~600 kms till Regina, and another ~700 till Calgary. Then, it's ANOTHER ~1200 till Vancouver.

      Most of the US population doesn't live with the nearest city being a full day's drive away. Most Americans I know can't fathom not having another large urban centre within a 2 hour drive.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    13. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Us Canadians can't put cell towers into the pouches of kangaroos like you guys.

    14. Re:Simple by thogard · · Score: 1

      Where did you get the 20% figure from? From what I can see, most Aus network maps are based on "25km from any cell unless a real big hill is in the way" added to "50km from any CDMA site". Once I'm out of a city, coverage is very poor compared to what is shown on the maps.

      As far as population desnity, Melbourne is now larger than what the US census dept claims is the population of Chicago.

    15. Re:Simple by Bill_Royle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Call it clustering if you wish, I'll call it a prelude to an invasion.

    16. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Winnipeg, Regina, Calgary and Vancouver are all on Highway 1. It's a long highway. If you want to compete on the Canadian cell market you gotta have coverage on the highways as well as the cities.

      Rogers and Telus has coverage from Vancouver to Calgary to Edmonton. Rogers has from Calgary to Regina to the 'Peg and more.

      That's a LOT of towers. You're paying for those towers. If you want a cheap Canadian cellphone, get a Fido but don't expect it to work outside the cities.

    17. Re:Simple by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      It's a common misconception of Canada that we're vastly spread out evenly across 10 million square kilometers. In reality the vast majority of us are clustered in a couple of relatively (I mean relative to Canada, although still quite huge compared to most nations) small areas. Outside of this it's sparsely distributed settlements, often related to natural resources, throughout the rest.

      For instance Rogers claims "Our digital TDMA and Analog cellular phone network covers up to 93% of the Canadian population with over 85% digital coverage.". I suspect that 93% of Canadians live in (far) less than 10% of the land mass.
      IIRC 90% of all Canadians live within 50 miles of the US/Canada border.
    18. Re:Simple by futuramarama · · Score: 1
      The 20% figure came from this report:

      "Those with a car antenna kit could now access mobile phone coverage across almost one-fifth of the Australian land mass, he said."

      Other reports mention a 15-18% coverage, which is about 1.4 million square km.

      --
      "And that solves the mystery of the missing ring" - Bender
    19. Re:Simple by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 0

      Fact 1: Over 80% of the Canadian population lives on the US border. Fact 2: The US/Canada border is the longest undefended border on Earth. Fact 3: In 1992, Ross Perot got 19% of the popular vote. Make your own conclusions.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    20. Re:Simple by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      I've been with both Bell Mobility and Rogers Wireless and coverage outside of cities, on flat land is extremely good. However, with Bell I've lost calls and had no service within fairly large towns (ones that are claimed to have very good coverage).

    21. Re:Simple by mark*workfire · · Score: 4, Informative
      Its much simpler to do what I did.

      I wanted a Sony T68i phone. Rogers wanted $699 for it, or $399 with a 3 year contract. I don't do contracts since if I'm not happy with the service, I switch. So, off to eBay I went, and voila, for a grand total of $125 Canadian including shipping I bought myself a T68i *unlocked*.

      Off to Radio Shack for a Rogers SIM I signed up for an account and have been using it with no problem. Even better, I'm in Europe this month, and simply popped in a SIM from our office over here and have nice GSM service wherever I happen to go over here.

      Try that with a Rogers LOCKED Sony phone. Many thanks to eBay!!!

    22. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but all I know is that if my rates here in the US should jump higher I'm gonna blame Canada.

    23. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so paranoid. They're just huddling up to us for warmth.

    24. Re:Simple by dryeo · · Score: 1

      If you want a cheap Canadian cellphone, get a Fido but don't expect it to work outside the cities.
      From the article
      Danger Hiptop / Sidekick $375.00 CDN (Fido) $199.00 USD = $264.97 CDN (T-Mobile).

      Fido should actually cost more as they are the only provider that doesn't tie you into a contract.
      Also I live 30 minutes from Vancouver and I can't get any wireless access from home. Shit I can only get a 26.4 internet connection.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    25. Re:Simple by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah.
      Why are most of you gathered within 50 miles of our border?!?
      Hmmm?

    26. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont compare canada to US, canada is like australia(20million ppl but even bigger than europe mainland).

      Both are a vast countries with ppl gathered only in few spots. So thats normal that national coverage doesnt get 100%

    27. Re:Simple by sudog · · Score: 1

      Want to invade a frozen tundra landmass as though you could do something better with it than its own residents?

      Shya right.. come on in, we'd welcome people like you. You don't have to make a fuss about it--just immigrate. Lamer. :-)

    28. Re:Simple by Rix · · Score: 1

      As a Vancouverite, I'll correct this. High speed net access is available even in the far flung suburbs that no one with all their teeth inhabits.

    29. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Canadian customers (we hope) should just be happy to have service.

      We are happy when we get service. However, if you're not in a metropolitan area, you can forget a digital phone. And the analog phone, for that matter, unless you have a nice hill to climb and can hit a metro tower.

      Fact is, the companies like to use all of the excuses listed above; but in reality they make very little effort to provide the service paid for. The tower density in cities is exactly the same as in the US, but in rural areas it drops to nearly zero.

      Don't bank on your phone working in cases of emergency, it probably won't. And don't bring a foreign phone, just get one in Canada.

      Just another example of how tolerant Canadians can be.

    30. Re:Simple by Mwongozi · · Score: 1

      Beware of buying GSM phones on eBay. A significant proportion of them are stolen. Here in the UK, when a phone is reported stolen, its IMEI number (a serial number unique to each handset - you can display it by typing *#06# on any GSM phone) is blacklisted on all the UK networks. Phone thieves circumvent this problem by selling it abroad on eBay, as the blacklists are not shared outside the UK.

    31. Re:Simple by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Wish you would tell Telus and Shaw that. I live north of Mission and the Cable ends about 3 miles down the road (either way). And the phone lines are still multiplexed (26.4 connections) little well DSL capable.
      Dave who yes is missing a tooth

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    32. Re:Simple by happystink · · Score: 1

      Well get on with it then, hurry up and annex us, I'm tired of paying so damn much for cell phones!!

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

    33. Re:Simple by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      Is that list available anywhere? That would be a huge deterrent to sales of stolen phones I would think. Especially if eBay (for one) cooperated and required the IMEI when listing a GSM phone for sale. Or is there some security/privacy consideration precluding listing that?

    34. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Canada is much bigger than the states...

      Only barely

      Uhh, how is that again? It's only barely much bigger?

      I disagree - I think it's only a little huger.
    35. Re:Simple by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      That's, err, pretty funny. Let me simplify this virtual conversation for you:

      Person 1 - "Canada is much bigger than the States!"

      Person 2 - "Oh yeah? How much?"

      Person 3 - "Only barely"

      Do you really have trouble understanding this?

    36. Re:Simple by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      "Maybe the cell phone purchase and plan purchase should be decoupled (as I believe it is in Europe) and then many customer problems would disappear."

      -1, everything's-better-in-Europe troll

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    37. Re:Simple by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      Canada is much bigger than the states

      Canada has a surface area of about 9.971M square kilometers. The United States comes in at about 9.372M square kilometers. Canada is about 6% larger, not all that much.

    38. Re:Simple by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's it.. Spread stereotypes. You're probably some big fat guy with a beard who works all day on a computer too. ;)

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  9. Simple by agent+dero · · Score: 1

    Because they will, until they stop allowing companies to ream them on price, companies will go for the higher returns.

    It's that simple canada, don't take it.

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
  10. Re:Canadians are a kind and gentle people by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

    Which is why Europeans pay so much less for their wireless tech than Americans, I suppose.

  11. Certainly seems that way... by RobinH · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had a blackberry through Rogers/AT&T, and once I got the U.S. roaming package on there, it cost me $57 (CDN) per month. That's more than my 3000 kb/s cable modem internet connection (under $40 per month). I loved the blackberry, but decided to cancel the subscription.

    Then, the day after I decided to cancel it, we were broken into and they stole it off the table. Reporting it stolen actually saved me the cancellation charge (~$50), and I figure whoever ended up with the hot item is getting payback by paying the high fees.

    That's what I tell myself anyway. Maybe it was that Michael Moore guy... I heard he was snooping around Windsor opening people's doors.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Certainly seems that way... by MC_Cancer_Pants · · Score: 1

      we were broken into
      And: snooping around Windsor opening people's doors

      I don't understand the "broken into" part. If you don't like the door, what exactly gets "broken", seems like they just came and took stuff, unless they broke a tube, or somthing.

    2. Re:Certainly seems that way... by MC_Cancer_Pants · · Score: 1

      that should have been "lock" instead of "like", I'm sorry, my mind is already in bed.

    3. Re:Certainly seems that way... by mattkime · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then, the day after I decided to cancel it, we were broken into and they stole it off the table. Reporting it stolen actually saved me the cancellation charge (~$50), and I figure whoever ended up with the hot item is getting payback by paying the high fees.

      Hm.....maybe thats how I can get out of my cell phone contract...

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    4. Re:Certainly seems that way... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      In the US if you don't lock your door, most insurance won't pay.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    5. Re:Certainly seems that way... by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1

      No, it works both ways. If you don't lock a door, you probably don't like it, either.

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    6. Re:Certainly seems that way... by RobinH · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the "broken into" part. If you don't like the door, what exactly gets "broken", seems like they just came and took stuff, unless they broke a tube, or somthing.

      The door was locked. They came in while we weren't home through a back window that wasn't lockable at the time. It is now. It was just kids, anyway. They took a couple bottles of alcohol, some gold jewelry, and any electronics they could fit in a duffel bag. They got caught a month or two later doing the same thing a couple streets over.

      So, I guess you're right... they didn't break the window. However, when they hit a house across the street, they did break a kitchen window there to get in.

      Now we have a rottweiler... I keep her nice and hungry throughout the daytime... he he.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    7. Re:Certainly seems that way... by Keithel · · Score: 1

      I've actually heard from a friend that the magic get-out-of-your-contract words are "I'm moving to minnesota"... though it's been a year or so, so maybe some provider actually has coverage in minnesota now, and won't buy that.

  12. Carrier subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It has a lot more to do with carrier subsidies for the phones. Most countries in the world don't have the same system that we do in the US, where your phone will only work on the network of the carrier that sold it to you.

    When a carrier gives you a discount on a phone, it makes a bet that writing off part of the cost of the phone will pay off with the contract you have to sign to use the phone on their network.

    Since GSM is now fairly prevelant in the US, I've taken to buying my phones and using whatever carrier I want (ok - there are only 3 choice right now) and allows me to use my unlocked phone with any carrier around the world, as long as my phone uses a frequency that is used in that country. Hence, I have 3 very high tech phones that I can choose between, depending on what I'm doing and where I am.

    That's what mobility is all about.

    1. Re:Carrier subsidies by Trillan · · Score: 1

      FYI, Canada has the same system (i.e. phones only work on the carrier you bought them from). So that's not it.

    2. Re:Carrier subsidies by wing03 · · Score: 1

      FYI, Canada has the same system (i.e. phones only work on the carrier you bought them from). So that's not it.

      Kinda true kinda not true.

      Bell uses CDMA. Rogers AT&T uses TDMA. Hence phones are inompatable.

      Also, isn't GSM is still reliant on CDMA or TDMA technologies? So there would still be incompatabilities?

    3. Re:Carrier subsidies by Trillan · · Score: 1

      The phones also include a SIM card and are locked to a particular network.

  13. Basic economics by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "This isn't the first time Canadian carriers have managed to charge far more than thier US conterparts for the same services. Anyone up there know why? It sure isn't the exchange rates."

    Supply and demand.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  14. Re:50lu710n by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Informative
    Solution: Buy phones in the US.

    I am not familiar with the way cell phones work in Canada, but I would guess your suggestion would not work. If I purchase a phone in US, I cannot transfer it to another US company because of the so called provider optimization (a.k.a. cell phone lockdown). I had two absolutely exactly same cell phones, one AT&T, another non-AT&T from a friend. Once my AT&T phone died, they would not switch my service to the other phone, claiming that it has been optimized for another provider. So I would not be surprised if cell phone companies found a way to block US-to-Canada phone transfer.

  15. w4llm4r7 by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what the reason is, but I would venture a guess that cheaper hardware/service in the US is WalMart's doing.

    Exploiting cheap Canadian labor... it's disgusting.

    --
    True story.
  16. My guess by jasonditz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The higher corporate tax rate and heavy regulation of Canada is encouraging these companies to pass the added expenses on to the customer.

    That or there is some form of protectionist tariff designed to protect domestic telecom hardware.

    It can't be a question of the companies just overcharging, if they were someone could undercut everyone else and drive them out of business.

    1. Re:My guess by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      It can't be a question of the companies just overcharging, if they were someone could undercut everyone else and drive them out of business.

      Nah, corporations tend to dislike undercutting each other these days. Why try driving someone else out of business when you can make more money coexisting by jointly skinning your customers?

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    2. Re:My guess by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      I have a hard time buying the notion of universal collusion. Usually this only works if there is a virtually impassable barrier to entry. AFAIK the Canadian government has no such barriers.

      Because right now, if we could say for certain that all these companies are overcharging and pocketing the difference, one of us could go to Canada, start our own competitor corporation charging a fair rate, and take a huge chunk of the market.

      Remember, its not just the corporations that exist which tell you something, its the corporations which don't exist.

    3. Re:My guess by gorilla · · Score: 1

      There is a huge barrier in the cost of putting up sufficent cells to attract customers. This isn't cheap, and you can't start selling until you've got a reasonable number up.

    4. Re:My guess by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Right, but those costs are common to all the competitors too, and they got into the business. New companies keep springing up all the time, so its clearly not a significant barrier. For some reason, however, all the new companies charge the same rates.

      The fact remains, if the existing companies are overcharging one could build a successful business plan around entering the market as the "low cost carrier". There is no shortage of capital for business ideas like that.

  17. just maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    canada needs to learn how to spell the word "their"

  18. Think Economics 1 Folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't think that this disparity is because of the ability of these companies to differentiate the cost legitimately? There is large fixed cost to be amortized in providing wireless infrastucture over such a large country, with such low population density.

    Here in Vermont we have the same problem with electricity - it costs a lot when you have few customers per mile of wire (or even wireless miles). For the national utilities (like Verizon Wireless and the wired long distance carriers) they lose money on rural areas in order to provide the same bundle to all customers within the country. In rural Alaska all your long-distance calls come over satellite to ground stations that might serve 1000 people who are paying 6.2 cents a minute for long-distance!!!

    Always look for a rational reason before you complain too much about conspiracies.

    1. Re:Think Economics 1 Folks! by raceface · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actualy its not as bad as you make it out to be. Understand that as you increase the cell usage around a cell site you hit a saturation point. Once that poit is reached you need to turn on second, third ... frequency bands. Most of Calgary is nearly saturating F1, with the exception of down town. So say you have a city like Huston (which uses five bands). If the last band is only used marginaly, the cost is much more than using the full capacity of all five bands.
      teh population density in most Canadian cities is almost perfect as to get away with using only one band. If the density were to increse slightly, F2 would have to be installed in more places and costs would go up alot.

      --
      Ride recklessly only when safe to do so.
    2. Re:Think Economics 1 Folks! by cprice · · Score: 1

      You are completely off base here. Wireless is only provided in the major centers, and along major corridors. There is no dog-sled wireless.

    3. Re:Think Economics 1 Folks! by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I hear this but don't buy it. It's like an airline going to a small airport. They all charge more for it sighting that they make less money on the flights going in and out of it. Of course the catch is that they make more money on every other flight going into and out of every single airport that that small one connects to, and they don't want you to consider that.

      It's the same way with wireless. Take AT&T for instance. Once you get on mLife (if you choose to), you'll sucker/convince others to do the same because of the way benefits work. When some redneck gets on it, his whole urbanized family might migrate to it (for instance).

      It's not so much a conspiracy, as it is a big lie. (A conspiracy is a web of lies, and it takes at least two people, where as this is just one company at a time) It's not illegal or anything, it's just blatantly immoral and outrageous.

    4. Re:Think Economics 1 Folks! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      In rural Alaska all your long-distance calls come over satellite to ground stations that might serve 1000 people who are paying 6.2 cents a minute for long-distance!!!

      Is that supposed to be expensive? I pay more than that for long distance through AT&T (I think it's like 14 cents a minute during the day, but I don't make any long distance calls so I don't remember). 6.2 cents a minute seems to be really really reasonable compared to the rest of the country unless you have some plan where you pay $25/month for 2 cents a minute calls.

    5. Re:Think Economics 1 Folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that supposed to be expensive? I pay more than that for long distance through AT&T (I think it's like 14 cents a minute during the day, but I don't make any long distance calls so I don't remember). 6.2 cents a minute seems to be really really reasonable compared to the rest of the country unless you have some plan where you pay $25/month for 2 cents a minute calls.


      No, it's supposed to be very cheap - like subsidized cheap. There's no way that you can maintain that infrastructure for that revenue stream. Did you understand my original point at all?

    6. Re:Think Economics 1 Folks! by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      such a large country, with such low population density.

      The problem with that argument is that where there is population - the cities - the density is quite high. Canada's low population density is because of endless stretches of barren wasteland in the Northwest Territories, fields of rock and lake in Manitoba and Northern Ontario, and hundreds of kilometers of farm and ranch land in the praries, dotted occasionaly by cities of two hundred thousand or more people.

      To put it another way: Imagine if everyone in the US suddenly disappeared, except for those in the state of California. If Los Angeles, San Fancisco, and the other cities in Cali all stayed the same, then the US would have a similar population density to Canada - but people would still be crammed in like sardines.

      From http://www.kidport.com/RefLib/WorldGeography/Canad a/Canada.htm comes a quote that I've been hearing all my life in some form or other: "Most of Canada's population lives within 100 miles of the border with the United States. About 75% of the population lives in major cities or towns." There isn't a problem with population density, because once you cover about 20 cities, you've already covered most of the population, and then you can start to expand from there, if it's feasible.

      --Dan

  19. Government regulation? by mhesseltine · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Don't Canadians have to pay a surcharge on recordable media to offset the effects of piracy? If so, couldn't this be the same type of thing? The government implementing a tax to offset some perceived injustice made available by wide-spread WiFI?

    Although, more than likely, as others have pointed out, it's simply supply and demand.

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:Government regulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea, but wrong topic.

      It's about wireless service as in cellphones, not WiFi..

  20. ehh by tytyty · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ehh

    --
    REAL penguins build their own kernels and binaries!
  21. Re:50lu710n by Wild+Wizard · · Score: 1

    Even the US is getting hosed for prices

    Come to the land down under just about every phone is available for $0 upfront

    here is some from the big bad telco as well

  22. hmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so they've been hoser'ed eh?

  23. Huh? by leoxx · · Score: 1

    I just paid $14.99 Canadian (after rebates) for an SMC 4 port wireless-b router. Oh sorry, I thought we were talking about wireless computer hardware.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think that rebate cheque will ever arrive, I have a 386-based computer to sell you.

    2. Re:Huh? by leoxx · · Score: 1
      I don't know, Future Shop is usually pretty good about these things. If it doesn't, I'll just take all my documentation back to the store and make a loud fuss. :)


      So how much do you want for that 386?

    3. Re:Huh? by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Completely offtopic, but I figured I'd share my experience with you.

      That router is complete crap. I mean, utterly. I bought 2 of them during the boxing day madness. The first worked fine, until we put a WEP key on it. Suddenly, nothing could pass traffic through it. Windows, Linux, different cards, nothing. Spent several hours with no success.

      So I figure, hey, a $15 wired router (and WEPless 802.11 in a pinch), what the hell. Until I tried gaming, webcams, or anything noticably suceptible to packet loss. Turns out this thing is horrendous for it. I was getting disconnected from IRC servers several times per *hour*, while another client on the same IRC server on the same ISP, on the same MODEM (thank you Shaw, for 2 IPs :) was on constantly.

      Tried the other one, exact same problems. Ended up returning them, because quite frankly I've never seen a worse piece of networking hardware, short of something that doesn't work at all. For fun, try running a ping for a while.. every second or so should work (-t flag in Windows if you've not a handy *nix box). You'll start seeing packet loss pretty quick, and insanely high return times occasionally. Like 1000 ms to your ISP's gateway. It was killing a steady 5% or so of my traffic, and the same tests run in front of the router worked flawlessly.

      Word of caution. Unless Winnipeg just got the bad batch :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    4. Re:Huh? by satterth · · Score: 1
      On that note, i'm starting to think something is up with Shaw. Friends of mine who are on Shaw have problems with router/wirewalls. SMC, Microsoft, USR, Netgear, everything, you name it. Except for Linksys, they seem to work though. Hmm...

      I might also point out, just about every one of those routers worked fine on my Interbaun account (Yes, I'm in Alberta)

      It may just be the possibility how friendly the ISP is to router/nat. But at the same time, not all NAT's are created equal. It's quite possibe that some/most home router/nats are complete garbage.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll just take all my documentation back to the store and make a loud fuss. :)

      Tried something like that when they hosed me. All that happened is that a manager came out and told the flunky talking to me that he should "get that guy out of the store". Actually I hadn't raised my voice yet at that point, but the store wasn't empty and a few people were listening to me complaining. Talk about a pathetic management style. Sure... tell the guy making crap money to lie to people about computers to make a pathetic commission to get an angry customer out of the store. What's he going to do? Physically remove me? Not bloody likely.

      Of course at this point anyone who shops there deserves what they get. Future shop lies to customers to make sales and treats their employees like crap. That's a company in need of some serious beats.

    6. Re:Huh? by rbrander · · Score: 1

      If you're in Calgary, drop by the Calgary Unix User's Group

      http://www.cuug.ab.ca

      Or even just hit on our "bsdwall" project

      http://www.bsdwall.org

      We'll show you how to turn any old 486 and a couple of $2 NICs into an OpenBSD firewalling router for your home that's safer than any Linksys.

      I can't say I've heard of your problem, but definitely not experienced it, since my "router" is just another computer... (I've got 4 machines inside the firewall)

    7. Re:Huh? by leoxx · · Score: 1

      I think Winnipeg got a bad batch. I bought mine in Toronna, and it seems to be working fine. Did you download and install the updated firmware? That was the first thing I did, and I have had no reliability problems. Anyway, for $14.99 I am extremely happy with this thing for what I need.

    8. Re:Huh? by satterth · · Score: 1

      Myself, i don't use the boxed firewall/nat/routers from Linksys and the gang. I've been using a linux variant for years now. (LRP, Leaf, etc...) I'm just the friend whom everyone calls when they have problems with their cheap home routers.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  24. Phones too expensive? by salmonz · · Score: 1
    I just switched my Rogers plan to Family Plan which pools minutes together.

    When I signed up, I got the following for free:

    - A free Motorola C350

    - A free DVD Player

    - Free airtime for 4 months.

    I am also switching my Bell landline to a Primus Broadband VoIP line. Check it out: www.primus.ca

    1. Re:Phones too expensive? by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I've always been leery of VoiP or even cell phones replacing landlines entirely. Primus' voice over broadband service, for instance, needs a powerered voice/BB gateway. What happens when there's a blackout?

      During the big blackout last August we at least had phone service, could have called 911 if necessary, for the half-day we were without power. Note that Primus' FAQ even says that 911 service isn't available yet.

    2. Re:Phones too expensive? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      That's pretty good, but mine came with a free blowjob every day for the rest of my life.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    3. Re:Phones too expensive? by salmonz · · Score: 1

      911 service is only as good when your neighbour is in trouble. If your house is burning down, you just get the hell out and call from another house. Didn't they teach you this in school?

      Calling 911 can be done from the two cell phones.

    4. Re:Phones too expensive? by squeegee_boy · · Score: 1

      What happens when there's a blackout?

      ...my UPS takes over. Really, it's no different than having nothing but portable phones with powered base stations in the house (which we have).

  25. We pay less for faster cable services. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $34.95 CAD for 65KBytes upload and 650KBytes download.

  26. Question: by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    When you sign up for service in Canada, do you have to pay a year long contract? If so, then never mind, I step down. If not, then I'd suggest that the money is still being spent, just in a different order.

    Personally, I think it's just that competition's not so hot up there.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Question: by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How long is a piece of string? You can get "pay as you go" phones that cost a lot upfront (upwards $200) with no monthly fees, or sign up for a free phone and get a plan for $20-30/mo (plus taxes, surcharges --> $45/mo) for 1-2 years. It all depends.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    2. Re:Question: by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Run those numbers through a CAN$ to US$ conversion, and that's roughly the state of the USA cell phone market too...

  27. Re:50lu710n by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, so just a quick drive down south to Australia and I'll get a free phone? What a deal! I'll be there shortly.

    Except my car's broken. Is Australia within walking distance? I'm in Vancouver. Please respond (I was banned from MapQuest).

    --
    True story.
  28. Intense competition in the US, and economic forces by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Well, in the US, most of the people who get cell phone plans, couldn't afford the hardware. Thus, some of the price is rolled into the 2 year contract that you have to pay an additional 150-300 dollars to get out of early.

    Most of the people I know who have Cell phones, couldn't afford $500 CDN, and pay more for minutes. Cell phone companies are trying to bring in new users, so they sell the phones cheap, figuring they'll make it up over time while they make a profit on the service.

    Second, the US market probably has more cell phones in the top 20-40 markets then Canada has people period. So a lot of fixed costs have to be amortized over fewer people in Canada.

    Finally, everything the in US wireless market appears to be about taking it in the shorts to gain market share, and to gain volume, to drive prices down. So they are investing (read losing their shirts) tons, and tons of money, trying to steal customers away from the other carriers, and make money on slim margins. Where as the Canadian market appears to be trying to sustain profitability at a much smaller volume. This means that Canadian service is probably a much better investment (from a business perspective). 5-10 years ago, cell service was a lot more expensive down here then it is now. Pricing for service is probably about the same. Not sure about the phone pricing.

    Kirby

  29. Simple explanation by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This isn't the first time Canadian carriers have managed to charge far more than thier US conterparts for the same services. Anyone up there know why?

    Well, I'm not entirely sure, but I get the distinct feeling it has something to do with Soviet Russia.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    1. Re:Simple explanation by satterth · · Score: 1
      I hear ya, But i'm pretty sure i know why...

      It's because we're so close to that curtain of Iron. It block's most of the signal.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  30. Economies of Scale by Quirk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure there are economies of scale that could account for the price differential.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
    1. Re:Economies of Scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if we, as Canadians, were to match the american pricing, then it would obviously be diseconomies of scale.

  31. Hmm by Tuffnut · · Score: 1

    I don't see why everyone is out buying $500 phones.

    I still have my "Zach Morris" phone which requires a backpack just to lug it around. Sure it doesn't have internet access and such, but it's does what its suppose to do, let me make telephone calls.

  32. The Solution by Newspimp · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Routers For Meds" Program. Each wireless router is good for one name-brand prescription or three generics.

    1. Re:The Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Including this one for overactive bladders?

  33. Rogers Wireless by va3atc · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a Rogers AT&T (Canada) phone (Pay as you go) and I get charged airtime when someone calls to leave me a message on the voicemail.

    So I called up Rogers and asked them to deactive the voicemail, so they did. Now whenever someone calls they get "This costumer needs to setup there voicemail etc etc" and I still get charged airtime! (even when the phone is powered down)

    I've called around to all the other cellphone carriers and none of them are this freakin' crazy.

    Basically my plan of attack is sell the phone (brand new which seems like a waste) and go with someone like Bell or Telus.

    Anyone want a phone ;-)

    --
    Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    1. Re:Rogers Wireless by A5un · · Score: 1

      Sure, what's the model and price. Is it a GSM phone? Unlocked? :)

    2. Re:Rogers Wireless by va3atc · · Score: 1

      Sure, what's the model and price. Is it a GSM phone? Unlocked? :)

      Its a Nokia 3390.

      I asked for the unlock code on this forum and a dude says he'll get unlock code for USD$10

      I must admit I love the phone and would be cool if I could get Telus on this by simply unlocking it, but does anyone know if this is legal?

      --
      Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    3. Re:Rogers Wireless by ddent · · Score: 1

      Legal yes, possible no. Telus doesn't do GSM. THe only other Canadian GSM provider is Fido. No contracts!

    4. Re:Rogers Wireless by va3atc · · Score: 1

      THe only other Canadian GSM provider is Fido

      Rumour has this carrier doesn't get a signal in my city (St. Thomas). Not certain why though.

      Its 15min from London, ON -- comments?

      --
      Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    5. Re:Rogers Wireless by bug-eyed+monster · · Score: 1

      That's really weird. I have the same pay as you go plan with Rogers. When I signed up, I asked explicitly to not activate the voicemail and I never get charged for incoming calls that I don't answer (the phone just keeps ringing). In fact, I mostly use the cell phone as a cheap numeric pager and apart from poor reception, I haven't had any complaints.

      It sounds like the rep didn't really deactivate your voicemail, but reset it. You should call them and ask them to deactivate it completely.

    6. Re:Rogers Wireless by mewsenews · · Score: 1

      rogers sucks.. i stopped using my "pay as you go" phone a few months ago because of the extremely short expiry times. it's a paperweight now.

    7. Re:Rogers Wireless by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1
      Now whenever someone calls they get "This costumer needs to setup there voicemail etc etc" and I still get charged airtime!
      It's definitely time to investigate your legal options. You'd think that for what they charge, Rogers Canada could provide a recorded message with proper spelling and grammar!

      On second thought, maybe nv5's response wasn't too far off: costumers, clowns, ...?
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    8. Re:Rogers Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for Rogers, I had a Rogers phone until they started charging me ~200/month (-20% employee credit). I took the early termination penalty and are back with Fido, now I pay ~50 a month.

      Seriously.... Rogers is screwed up when it comes to Wireless.

    9. Re:Rogers Wireless by zm · · Score: 1

      You sir, are wrong. Rogers also operates a GSM network.

      --
      Sig ?
    10. Re:Rogers Wireless by happystink · · Score: 1

      I believe it, Fido doesn't work within 15 minutes of MANY cities, or even IN some. Even around toronto, if you go too far north, like 30 or 45 minutes, your coverage will die, it's insane.

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

    11. Re:Rogers Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you own the phone (after a conditional service contract, if you have one), there is nothing illegal about it. Ask your provider to unlock it for you (as far as I heard, most do and some (eg AT&T in the US) don't - but ask anyway). If they don't and you still own the phone, go with someone else who can/will unlock it for you.

  34. this is nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't canadians pay extra for everything but drugs, anyway?

    1. Re:this is nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually most non-electronic things are about the same price or cheaper. Food for example is cheaper than in the states. I travel on business a lot in the states and I am always amazed at the prices you guys pay for stuff like vegetables and meat after exchange.

  35. We get hosed ... by serialdj · · Score: 4, Informative
    Because unlike the U.S. we here in Canada have only four cellular carriers, and if you want to 1X, or GSM then there are only two carriers.

    No Competition means higher rates, no reason to lower them, who else are you going to go to.

    1. Re:We get hosed ... by happystink · · Score: 1

      Wait, who has 1x? I don't know much about it, is it good, better than gprs?

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

    2. Re:We get hosed ... by serialdj · · Score: 1

      1X is an enhanced version of CDMA, and offers transfer rates close to 3G in the proper situation.

  36. +5 1nc173f00l by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

    Thank you for that. +5, Insightful

    Sincerely,
    Guy Who Was Banned from Moderationdom

    --
    True story.
  37. econ 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    supply and demand. products are priced according to their markets.

    in the states we pay more for cars than our canadian counterparts. frankly i'd rather pay a few bucks more for wireless hardware than a few thousand more for cars.

  38. Re:50lu710n by jest3r · · Score: 1

    No they ARE talking about hardware. RTFA.

    It looks like you definately could buy the phone in the US to save some cash ... maybe the surging Canadian dollar hasn't worked its way to the phone prices yet .. or maybe the Canadian companies can't negotiate the high volume deals the big US companies can.

  39. Interesting Stats for Canada by JumperCable · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know the answer but here are some interesting stats on Canadian wireless:

    http://www.cwta.ca/industry_guide/facts.php3

    ...maybe it's because the Canadian phones need to include both French & English?

    You know you could really save a lot of money if your country went ahead and consolidated to using just French.

    1. Re:Interesting Stats for Canada by geordie · · Score: 1

      bonjour, mon chat est un radis, buisson est une orange, vos odeurs de dessus de bureau comme le poo, me pilotent a la banane! vous chaudiere a pression folle!

      Because all Canadians speak French right :o)

    2. Re:Interesting Stats for Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia's phones have been multilingual for years. Even my old 6110 from like last millennium supported 10 languages. The language packs naturally differ by region the phones are sold in. I really doubt you could save one single dollar by removing all but one language.

    3. Re:Interesting Stats for Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -maybe it's because the Canadian phones need to
      -include both French & English?

      yeah, all those menus in a second language....THATS the cost right there!

      Really insightful.

    4. Re:Interesting Stats for Canada by JumperCable · · Score: 1

      yeah, all those menus in a second language....THATS the cost right there!

      I wasn't really being serious about the French-English language issue raising the prices for the phones.

      Besides, everyone knows they get their multi-lingual programming done at rock bottom prices in India.

      Kindly do the needful.

  40. Phone costs by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    I didn't RTFA, but, I'd like take a leap wonder what the hell they're talking about. If it's the cost of the hardware, well, the cost is very negligable. You can get a free phone, albeit a not very good one if you sign a contract. A good phone can be had for $50. If you want to buy one without a contract you'll get hosed. Because although you won't get a contract, you'll pay more for the phone, and won't get a better deal on your rates anyway. Oh, and the phone is locked down, and we don't have number portability yet, so you might as well have a contract.

    The monthly rates are very good. Comparable to the US, even not taking into account the exchange rate. I don't know what this article is talking aboot (ha ha). I think cell phones have very good prices north of the border.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Phone costs by GPool · · Score: 1
      I didn't RTFA...

      Maybe you should have...
  41. Re:50lu710n by InadequateCamel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IIRC you can't use phones purchased in OZ in North America unless you buy a ghastly expensive tri-band phone. I had to sell my mobile when I left the UK for that reason. And it is the service that is the major problem, as they are selling the phones.

    Ah, how I miss my Virgin Mobile service...buying top-up cards when I needed them rather than paying a monthly fee for minutes I may or not use, and not getting charged for the calls that you receive?! I re-emphasise "service"; what a concept :-)

  42. Toilets by raider_red · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone want to arrange a deal where we trade cheap cel-phones for high-flow toilets? I think we could work something out.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    1. Re:Toilets by satterth · · Score: 1
      Umm... I'll take you up on the offer...

      Are the phones locked to providers, like every where else and can we somehow get bluetooth into the equation? (yes, I'm in Telus territory and in Alberta)

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    2. Re:Toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I normally flush twice anyway.

    3. Re:Toilets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I miss the high-flow toilets (moved from Canada to US). I never had to double-flush unless I had a donair (a.k.a. "gyro") the night before. In the US, I have to flush two to three times under normal circumstances. Now tell me, how is that conserving water?

  43. huh? how is it expensive here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    bell 2 yr contract. $35. free unlimited evenings and weekends (6 pm to 8 am. yes, 14 hours FREE). upgraded to a samsung phone from the crap motorola i had with the free tech upgrade. customer service is unbelievable. mind you, i have a low daytime minutes per month, but hey, why would i answer my personal phone when i am at work?

    so how is $35 a month for a free phone and unlimited evenings and weekends expensive?

  44. Take off, eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You hoser.

  45. Nonsense! by Schlopper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know what the author is rambling on about.. I just bought a Fido phone (Siemens A56) with 3 months of service for $75 CDN.

    The monthly plan is $25/month = 100 weekday minutes plus 1000 weekend/evening minutes AND all Fido-to-Fido calls and SMS are free. That's $19 USD per month.. AND a free phone.

    And to top it all off, Fido subsidizes all their handsets AND you're never locked into any contract - it's all on a monthly basis. No complaints here when it comes to cell phone prices or cell phone plans in Canada..

    - One Happy Fido Customer.

    1. Re:Nonsense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *Work* for Rogers and I still bought my last phone on ebay.. Unlocked Sony Ericsson t68i for 200 cdn with 2 batteries, charger for wall/usb, headset, spare faceplate/keypad. Far less than I could have got it at the time even with a contract. Just call and check the IMEI # number of the phone with your carrier before you buy to make sure it's not stolen/blacklisted for any reason and it's all good.

    2. Re:Nonsense! by GPool · · Score: 1

      You got the model number wrong. The SL56 from Rogers is $400, and Fido doesn't sell it. The A56 from Fido is $25, and Rogers doesn't sell it.

      Very different phones.

    3. Re:Nonsense! by tho+1234 · · Score: 1

      Fido sucks- they have no transmission towers outside of the major cities, and even within the cities, they have significantly poorer reception/signal strength than ANY of its competitors. My fido phone could not be used outside of toronto (unless i paid 75 cents a minute for analog), forcing me to change carriers to telus. I've never looked back, as their coverage is way better anyways. Fido does give the cheapest prices for new phones, but over a 2 year plan the price difference is negligible, and you have to live with terrible service. And for any of the new phone deals, you do have to agree to a 2-3 year plan (ie identical to a contract) to get the $200-300 discount off the phone. If you want to change plans/carriers, you'll have to pay back the difference.

    4. Re:Nonsense! by hugzz · · Score: 1

      I trust they gave you a free phone when you signed up to do ads with them?

    5. Re:Nonsense! by mrmcwn · · Score: 1

      1. $75 phone + 3 months
      2. "$25" recurring
      3. 911 fee
      4. "System Access Fee"
      5. $.75/minute roaming when you are more than twenty blocks from Yonge & Bloor
      6. ????
      7. Profit

    6. Re:Nonsense! by happystink · · Score: 1

      Oh my god this is so true, I had to go with fido for their unlimited GPRS, but I have gone to numerous large tourist attractions within an hour of Toronto, and had my phone not work. Fido are terrrrible for coverage, and short-sighted people will probably say something like "yeah but I don't leave toronto/montreal/whever, so it's worth the 2 bucks a month I save", but the one day you go to pick someone up at the airport or something and your car dies and you can't use your phone, you'll feel like a putz. Fido's model is this: cheap pricing (slightly cheaper) but terrible coverage. I only wish they had heard of the "can you hear me now" campaign and how well that had done.

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

  46. 1 n0 by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... yeah. That's what I meant... No trolling going on here. Move right along.

    --
    True story.
  47. Simple Economics by kilocomp · · Score: 1

    Assuming the price is at equilibrium with supply and demand for both markets that means Canadians are willing to bear a higher price.

    Of course the fact is that Canada's economy is more socialistic than than the US also plays into it too (the reason for the drug prices being different).

  48. Re:7h1nk 3c0n0m1c5 w0n f0002!!!!!111 by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1
    Always look for a rational reason before you complain too much about conspiracies.

    I see you're falling right into their trap. That's exactly what they WANT you to do!

    --
    True story.
  49. Wow.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You mean, the same things in different countries have different prices?

    What a stunning observation.

    Canada is not the US. You will find a great many things where prices are not the same, some higher, some lower, sometimes by a lot either way.

    1. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah in Canada there is many offers with many prices , if you look in for every where you will find the best prices :)

      Star du X

  50. Think that is expensive? by Aeolusz · · Score: 1

    Telus Mobility is offering the Samsung SPH I700 for $1049.00 Can Verizon offers the same phone for $699.00 US which is not that different. From what I understand, cellular phone companies actually lose quite a lot of money every time they sell you a phone. I think that the Canadian companies, competing for a smaller market, have gotten fed up with the losses. Microcell and Telus have yet to make any profit on their cellular division. I do not know about Rogers and Bell. So, the higher prices may simply reflect a refusal on their part to be burned for a client.

    1. Re:Think that is expensive? by cmallinson · · Score: 1
      Microcell and Telus have yet to make any profit on their cellular division.

      Where do you get that from? You are right that mobile companies are trying to move away from handset subsidies, but that comment is far from accurate.

    2. Re:Think that is expensive? by Aeolusz · · Score: 1

      Hey, you are right. Telus did do much much better in 2003. Thanks for correcting me. Microcell (Fido) remerged from restructuring and looks all rosy...but doesn't every company after restructuring?

  51. Be thankful for what you receive by nighty5 · · Score: 1

    Compared to other countries, the US / Canada prices for IT products and bandwidth is way cheaper than anywhere else in the World. Australia for instance (where I am from) are playing forever catch up. Where mobile phone calls, ISP charges, IT books are still overlypriced, even with our dollar at a reasonable 80 cents to the US greenback.

  52. Re:50lu710n by jangell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You don't think that this disparity is because of the ability of these companies to differentiate the cost legitimately? There is large fixed cost to be amortized in providing wireless infrastucture over such a large country, with such low population density.

    Here in Vermont we have the same problem with electricity - it costs a lot when you have few customers per mile of wire (or even wireless miles). For the national utilities (like Verizon Wireless and the wired long distance carriers) they lose money on rural areas in order to provide the same bundle to all customers within the country. In rural Alaska all your long-distance calls come over satellite to ground stations that might serve 1000 people who are paying 6.2 cents a minute for long-distance!!!

    Always look for a rational reason before you complain too much about conspiracies.

  53. Two words by Grieveq · · Score: 0, Troll

    America owns!

  54. Re:50lu710n by Lehk228 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Subsidy lockout exists because cell phones don't actually cost $50-$100, they are alot more and the provider pays most of that price counting on customers using their service long enough to make up their investment, if you buy a phone at it's actual cost you will be able to use it on any compatable network, but with the mess that is the current cell network in the US i'll stick to subsidy locked cheap phones for now.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  55. Why do cdn pay more for everything. by Swai · · Score: 0

    Canada population is only 8.5% of US's, to that reduce the number of people that live in poverty adn those who can affort it pay for it.

    The number of carriers in Canada is very low compared to US's.

    There is a BIG alliance between cdn carriers, some kind of psuedo monopoly, like the goverment itself.

    Most politics in Canada lobby for private sectors over anything else.

    Maybe the Canadian gov taxes the phones without canadians knowing about it.

    And in the light side, Canadians are to drunk to see when they are getting ripped paying for wireless services.

  56. The article forgot to point something out... by agwis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Long term customers of Rogers get their cell phones for free.

    I've been with them for almost 10 years, and I only paid for my first phone, which was one of those old Motorola bag phones...remember them? :)

    About every 2 years I've been offered a choice of a new phone for no charge, and they've always given me a good selection to choose from. My latest is the Nokia 3595 which I received about 6 months ago...and it's a great phone.

    I suspect that the article is right when it comes to new customers signing up, or customers that only want to go on pay as you go plans. In those situations Rogers can't be sure that they will come ahead by giving you the phone for free. But if you're a long term customer they certainly look after you and make sure that you always have a fairly modern phone.

    I don't know if US carriers do the same but it seems reasonable to me. Why give phones away if you haven't got some assurance that your customers will stick around?

    I can't complain about the rates either although I don't know what the US carriers rates are to compare with. I used to have the Digital 1 plan when I did a lot of travelling (both in the US and Canada) and long distance, international roaming charges, unlimited text messaging, and 1000 daytime minutes (evenings and weekends unlimited) cost me about $100 a month. The amount of time I used the phone combined with the fact that most of my calls were always long distance sure seemed like a good deal to me.

    I've always felt I've got a fair shake up here.

    -Pat

  57. one word by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    TAXES...of course, it can also be because some govt/customs guy put the decimal point at the wrong spot in the USD to Canadian conversion.....

  58. Obligatory Quote.... by CHaN_316 · · Score: 1

    Uhhh.......blame Canada?

    --
    "There is no spoon." - The Matrix
  59. Re:50lu710n by mattkime · · Score: 1

    actually, gsm phones are now being supported in the US. i'm not sure if you could bring your phone from there (outside the US) to here (in the US) but I know my gsm phone works there.

    also, i believe the US does have one thing right - if you're on a cell phone, you should pay for airtime. yes, it may be nice for you not to worry about minutes on incoming calls, but then the cost is simply put on the caller. who wants to worry about the cost of calling someone on a cell phone? it was a problem at a company i worked for in the UK - we avoided calling mobiles because we didn't want to pay by the minute.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  60. Maybe it's karma? by decimal0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...to make up for their relatively affordable internet access.

  61. CRTC by nv5 · · Score: 1

    This sounds just ridiculous. I think you should complain to the CRTC. Sometimes that wakes those clowns up !

    1. Re:CRTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe he should find out from a support guy who knows what hes doing?

      My mother, aunt and two friends have Pay as You Go and it costs them 150$ in air time (25$ every two months) and when I call them and the phone is turned off the voice says that the customer you are trying to reach is unavailable.

      Its a shame youve got a problem but your situation isnt enough to slam the whole program.

  62. Bias Article... by Ironix · · Score: 1



    I recently signed up with Fido Canada for their City Fido service, which is unlimited local calling and costs only 40$ CDN a month. I've replaced my home phone with a cell phone it was so cheep.

    --
    Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
  63. Re:50lu710n by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    Is Australia within walking distance? I'm in Vancouver.

    Yeah, sure. Just start walking southwest. There's a little bit of water, but don't worry. It's real shallow and you'll have no problem walking through it.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  64. Access Fee Insanity by RedSynapse · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in Canada and the one thing that made me give up my cell phone plan was the dreaded monthly "Access Fee."

    I had a plan that was $20 for 200 minutes any time, but on top of this EVERYONE is required to pay a $7.95 access fee regardless of what plan they're using. So if you're a businessperson with a $100 a month plan you end up paying what amounts to an 8% tax, but if you are a po' ass student like me you end up paying an insane %40 tax (plus you also have to pay %15 tax on top of the total amount). INSANE.

    All providers in Canada charge this fee. It seems to be governemnt mandated, although I think I read once that the individual providers are allowed to set what the fee is but they all decided to make it 7.95.

    IMHO this is why we don't have wider adoption of mobible phones in Canada.

    Also I'm not sure how it is in other countries but every text message you send with SMS costs 10 cents. So if you want to send a text message to your friend's mobile phone that says "Hi Jane how are you?" that's ten cents.. then if she replies "I'm good, yourself?" another ten cents, and on and on. My carrier (fido) had a "introductory period" where they gave away the text messaging for free and a lot of people were using it. Now that it's 10 cents per message (I think it's max 256 characters) NOBODY USES IT. I mean come on, does it really cost them 10 cents to transmit a 256 character max plain text message? I think if they charged 1 cent per message they would make more money because people would actually use the service.

    1. Re:Access Fee Insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SMS character limit on GSM networks is 160 chars per message. In Australia where I live we pay 25c per message sent and yet millions are sent daily. Reducing the price doesn't mean people will use it. People will use it if they find it useful.

    2. Re:Access Fee Insanity by wing03 · · Score: 1

      Way back in the days of cell phone infancy.....

      When Rogers was selling the Amigo phone as the entry level consumer phone and before.

      You had to buy a General Radio Station License at a cost of $45/year on signup as well as filling out some sort of form that went to the CRTC or whatever our version of the FCC is.

      It used to be the same license you had to buy when you bought a radio set for your RC airplane.

      But then they removed RC sets from requiring a GRS license in the mid 90s and around then, the cell providers started charging about $4/month for the license fee rather than a $50 fee on the anniversary date.

    3. Re:Access Fee Insanity by dan42 · · Score: 1

      Unlike most Canadian providers, BelMobility includes the access fee in the listed Monthly rate. And receiving text messages is free (sending is a pain anyway).

    4. Re:Access Fee Insanity by Lictor · · Score: 1

      >CRTC or whatever our version of the FCC is.

      Industry Canada regulates the spectrum here.

      CRTC is more about content, policy decisions and political patronage.

    5. Re:Access Fee Insanity by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      I am told that cell phone users in New York must pay an extra $9.99/mo "access fee" to have a New York area code...

      and I understand there's a significant amount of competition in the New York cellular market. In fact the excuse is that they're running out of numbers.

      Feel free to correct me.

  65. Re:50lu710n by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

    Walking through it? I was planning on walking on top of it.

    --
    True story.
  66. Canada doesn't have the McCaws... by barfy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is one and only one reason that phones are so cheap in the States. (It isn't that they are more expensive in Canada).

    Craig McCaw and bro's changed the rules of cellular in the United States. There belief was that it was "the subscriber" uber alles. That all else would just follow. In other words, you have to give away the expensive phones to get the subscriber. A large part of the cellular network has been paid on the backs of investors and lenders in Bankruptcy court, and the McCaws made billions selling out to ATT while the getting was good.

    It is going to be more difficult to get new players (capital) to play the same game and risk that kind of capital that would likely be lost in a massive buildup of customers. Canada, just doesn't have a McCaw to rock the boat, and force everyone to play a different game. They do have Canadian Tire money though!

  67. I always blame NASA by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    The prices are obviously set by NASA. You see, in Canada, they use the metric system, and NASA thought they were going to go metric, but some of the guys didn't get that memo...

    It was an honest mistake, folks, really. It's like rocket science.

    Or maybe...

    The computer industry did it! I mean, when did you ever buy a 40 GB hard drive that actually was 40 GB? They might have told Samsung to charge $400 for a $372.52 phone and say they were measuring the price differently. Yeah. If you're the only ones who measure it that way, it isn't different - it's wrong.

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    1. Re:I always blame NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I believe Slashdot covered this one already.

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/08/0349 25 4&mode=thread&tid=137&tid=185&tid=190&tid= 198

      There was a study done too...

      http://www.wiebetech.com/mediawp.html

      And guess what, the manufacturers put MORE into their drives than what it says on the box, remember? It's the OS that lies to you...

  68. NO shit. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always see shit like,

    59.99 USD

    799,999.999 CDN.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  69. Rogers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The real reason is because Rogers is a load of scum sucking assholes. They outright lie to you, and they'll get away with whatever they can.

    There's a reason nearly all the examples are Rogers.

  70. Re:50lu710n by jred · · Score: 1

    Summer before last (2002), a German guy stayed at my place for a month, while his gf was going to a local college. They both used their German phones in the states, although they primarily stuck to text services, to keep the costs down.

    They *may* have mentioned buying new phones specifically so they'd be compatible, but I'm not sure, it *was* a couple of years ago :)

    --

    jred
    I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  71. What's with the hubub? by Zazi · · Score: 0

    I honestly do not know why this article was even posted in the first place. It should be no surprise to anyone that one thing in one country will cost something else in another country. A visa versa example of this "Canada cell phones more expensive than the US" deal is the US's struggle with the drug companies. People drive to Canada, because the prices are lower in Canada. If anyone IS surprised by varying prices among different countries, they really have to look around and think about what kind of world this is.

  72. Services cheaper in Canada by willy_me · · Score: 1
    For example, I pay $16.99CND per month for a DSL line complete with modem. It includes 2 IP addresses and ~150kbit/s download rates.

    Now I can't speek about cell services, but the same company from which I get DSL also provides cell access. I can only imagine that if they charge more for the phones it is because they charge less for service.

    One thing that people must remember is that people have less money in Canada - less expensive plans are more desirable. This gives individuals a cheaper alternative - admittedly with a cheaper cell phone. At least many people that would normally scoff at cell phones because of their high monthly costs will sign up.

    1. Re:Services cheaper in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good price!!! What ISP?

    2. Re:Services cheaper in Canada by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      People in Canada don't have "less money", there are just fewer stupidly-rich gazillionaires around here. There are less dirt-poor people too. We're simply less extreme than the US.
      We tend to be more cautious with our spending too. Part of that is cultural, part of it is economical (price fluctuations w/ the CND dollar). So we're not as inclined to blow $400 on a stupid cell phone with a shitty "deal" (the irony of that word is sickening).
      Personally, I think cell phones are rip offs. They're overpriced and under supported novelty item/status symbols. The industry has a *LONG* way to go before they can convince me to even try one out. But hey, thats their loss.

    3. Re:Services cheaper in Canada by Curtman · · Score: 1

      I'm paying $20 for mine ($15.71 USD @ 0.785237). I wouldn't call it a deal really though, since the government sees fit to subsidize them. Its a whole other debate whether this kind of thing is in the same category as highways and other infrastructure. I just don't think its fair to compare US ISP prices to Canadian ones, the rules of the game are very different.

      I'm not sure what you meant by the Canadians have less money thing though. The gap between rich-vs-poor is probably much smaller in Canada than the US. But I don't think you can make a general assumption that we have less money. For example, if you compare your average Canadian Joe with his southern counterpart, Canada Joe is much better off this January than he was last January. I tried to take a look at the overall median income for both countries in 2000 (The only common recent year I can seem to find statistical data for), we're pretty equal.

      USA $42,148 USD ($60,832.21 CDN @ 0.6929 - Dec1999 exchange rate) or at todays rate $53,679.69 CDN
      Canada = $55,016 CDN

      I don't know exactly how to compare the two considering the rise and fall of the US $ over the past few years. There's too many other factors like taxation rates, and services available, and regional conditions for me to make a call on it. My idea of an urban ghetto is probably very different than USA Joe's too. I say urban ghetto, because my previous job had me travelling in northern Manitoba, and Saskatchewan. Let me tell you, some of those reserves are scary places to be, but I think the reasons may be very different, and the populations are much much smaller.

      I'm going to submit before I get the urge to haul out my Stats 100 text. (Which reminds me, the comparison of US to Canadian tuition rates would be another interesting study)

    4. Re:Services cheaper in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you mean 150 kilobytes per second rather than 150 kilobits too, 150kbit is not good.

    5. Re:Services cheaper in Canada by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

      Where are you getting your DSL from?
      Also whot province are you in and whos the ILEC in your city?

  73. Re:50lu710n by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    IIRC you can't use phones purchased in OZ in North America unless you buy a ghastly expensive tri-band phone

    The thing that always bugged me about buying dual band phones, rather then tri-bands, is the store staff never seems to know which bands they support. I mean, a dual band bought in Aus likely wouldn't work in america, and visa versa.

    But I've noticed that some phones are offered are tri-bands and they are not all that gastly expensive at all here in america, here is one example

    http://www.t-mobile.com/products/overview.asp?ph on eid=166753&class=phone
    Motorola V66 - (tri-band: 900, 1800, & 1900 MHz) $49.99 or free after mail in rebate.

    Nokia 6610 900 / 1800 / 1900 mhz $149.99 or $99.99 after mail in rebate
    http://www.t-mobile.com/products/overview. asp?phon eid=191381&class=phone

    Sony Ericsson T610.. which was free for many consumers with dockable camera, but now costs $199.99 or $99.99 after mail in rebate.
    http://www.t-mobile.com/products/overview .asp?phon eid=195350&class=phone

    Other wise...

    Get a pay as you go phone in your region of choice... In america I know that t-mobile offers gsm phones for $99.99... pop your chip in and hey.. victory

    or

    Hit a thrift shop in america... plenty of older dual band phones to choose from, for $5.00... victory!

    So yea, if you want a tri-band based on my shopping today, you'd have to shell out a minium of $50.00 and might get that back in the mail.

    I'm not sure what's up in Aus on the subject.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  74. I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...a fact of which I am deeply ashamed.

    And the short answer is "it's more expensive because they can get away with it."

    But yes, it does come down to basic economic, with the corporate greed angle tossed in. Canada is a smaller market, with fewer competitors (4 national, plus a few regional). So the wireless carriers CAN charge more because the consequences of doing so not as great. Plus, the major carriers tend to follow each other quite closely. If one finds a way to charge more for something and get away with it, the others will quickly follow -- why should the other guy be the only one to make more?

    IMO, the Canadian wireless industry is not particularly customer oriented -- they are competitor-oriented. It's not so much about "how can I win more customers through my excellent handsets and plan" as it is about "how can I get my ARPU higher than the competitors and my Churn lower, thus sticking it to the competition when the rankings are published." If the customer happens to benefit, it's a nice consequence.

    That's why the CityFido plan (you probably haven't heard of this unless you're in Vancouver, but you can transfer your landline number to a wireless number, and you get $40/month unlimited local calling) sent the Canadian wireless industry into a tizzy. The other 3 national carriers began running some pretty harsh Fido switch promotions -- particularly on the East coast, where Fido is based. Makes some sense on a competitor level (take out Fido where they are strongest) but not on a consumer level (Easterners who've never heard of CityFido can't understand why the big 3 carriers are all going after the little guy.)

    Mind you, Fido has had financial difficulties lately, so they probably had to pull a gutsy move like this. The rest of the industry doesn't see how Fido's model is sustainable.

    But on the other hand, some stuff just costs more here. Hence the people who cross the boarder every month to shop.

    --

    I can spell. I just can't type.

    1. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The other 3 national carriers began running some pretty harsh Fido switch promotions -- particularly on the East coast, where Fido is based.


      You must live out west, because Fido is an Ontario based company and there are a few provinces EAST of ontario - Quebec, New Brunswick,Nova Scotia,Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland/Labrador.


      Yet another Canadian who flunked Canadian Geography evidently.

    2. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a few provinces EAST of ontario - Quebec, New Brunswick,Nova Scotia,Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland/Labrador.

      Thanks, grandpa. For the "Labrador" reference, I mean. When listing provinces, "Labrador" adds nothing.

    3. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, Fido is a company based in Montreal, Quebec, not Ontario.

      And Ontario & Quebec is considered as the "East" of Canada. NB/NS/PEI/NF are considered as the Maritimes.

      I know, I work for the dog.

    4. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The model is sustainable because the majority of the CityFido subscribers are not actual Fido customers, they are NEW customers who are switching their landline to a mobile on the CityFido service.

      Also, most of them are spending a shitload of money on extras: LD bundles, Call Display, Voicemail, GPRS, etc.

      Believe me, CityFido is VERY sustainable for Fido because it doesn't affect another Fido's business, where as Telus Mobility can't really do that because its hurting Telus, Bell Mobility can't do the same because it'd be hurting Bell, and Rogers... well they're planning on launching local phones services too so...

      Also, most of CityFido customers don't have only one line, they have 3-5 for the whole house family.

      Before CityFido, I didn't encounter that many CONSUMER accounts with 4-5 lines and spending 400-500$ a month. It's quite usual now in Vancouver. (Yes, I'm a Fido CSR)

    5. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The other 3 national carriers began running some pretty harsh Fido switch promotions -- particularly on the East coast, where Fido is based.

      You must live out west, because Fido is an Ontario based company and there are a few provinces EAST of ontario - Quebec, New Brunswick,Nova Scotia,Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland/Labrador.

      Who cares... Everything after Alberta is the land of government teat-suckers. The West is the only real Canada left.

    6. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Mind you, Fido has had financial difficulties >lately,

      Lately?
      Theyve been on the verge quite a few times.
      of course, they spend like 80% on advertisement and the rest on infrastructure. (Like SCO!!!)

      A friend showed me 2 years ago the amount of new antennas that they cell phone companies where putting up, Fido was dead last, so far behind the other 2-3 it wasnt even funny.

      zeke

    7. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Informative

      The other advantage beside new customers are existing customers who have switched plans because of CityFido. I was previously on a plan that was around $25/month + license fee. I "usually" came in under my minutes per-month, but it was a no-brainer to switch to CityFido for $40 and not ever have to worry about monitoring minutes, not to mention not paying the extra license fee directly.

      Basically turns your cell phone into the equivilent of a city-wide cordless phone, which is just amazingly convenient.

      Needless to say, kids love it - unlimited chat time with their friends. All of my friends (mid-20s/early 30s) have switched to it - the only people who havn't I would classify as "uninformed", "live in rural areas where they get no service", or are "locked into long contracts with other providers "(fools).

      As far as wireless pricing goes, Fido does need to compete a better. For instance, they're selling a P800 (SP locked) for $1,000 Cdn which is just plain stupid. I picked up my (unlocked) P800 a month before Fido introduced theirs for $900 taxes in. This was over 6 months ago, and the price hasn't budged, despite the costs dropping like a rock.

      I suppose uninformed consumers (the vast majority) have no idea what the real prices for the phones are. Until you get digging on the net and look for pricing you don't see how much you're losing-out, although even then, people are scared-off by compatibility concerns and such which providers help foster (to keep customers "buying local").

      At one point, Rogers AT&T was even refusing to sell local SIM cards to GSM phone users unless they purchased the handset as well (to lock them into a longterm contract, as well as making $$$ on a handset).

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    8. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1
      And Ontario & Quebec is considered as the "East" of Canada.

      Yes, they are part of "Eastern" Canada, meaning the east half. But they are certainly not considered the "East Coast" as the parent post refers to them. The East Coast is synonymous with the Maritimes and/or the Atlantic Provinces. (We even have the East Coast Music Awards there, which definitely exclude Ontario and Quebec, and anything further west.)

    9. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 3, Informative

      From an operational perspective, the wireless and wireline businesses of both Bell Mobility and Telus Mobility are entirely separate. One side doesn't pay much attention to the other. So the sustainability question is not around where the business is going to come from (that's obvious -- who wouldn't want $40 unlimited?) but about how Fido can become increasingly profitable while charging so little.

      That is, the big 3 are worried about CityFido pushing the precious ARPU down. Again, attracting new customers is important, but not at the cost of potentially making less per customer. For example, you may have noticed that all the wireless carriers have changed the Evenings clock to start later -- it increases overage minutes, thus increasing ARPU. Customer is screwed over, but hey, higher profits. And since all of them started doing this, competition benefits no one. (I saw a presentation on this a while back; did I mention I'm ashamed of where I work?)

      Then again, (just musing here) the sustainability issue may be simply be fear-mongering. Fido, having gone through financial trouble, is probably in the best position to sustain a lower ARPU model since (frankly) they don't need to worry as much about being less profitable than last year. (And with the lowest ARPU in Canada, the CityFido plan probably pushes the numbers up.)

      I'm not knocking Fido -- I think the CityFido plan is a good strategy. But the rest of the Canadian industry fear that this will bring profits down.

      Oh, just for those who think I flunked geography, I accidentally used internal language, where West Coast = BC+AB, East Coast = ON+PQ, Atlantic = NB+NS+PEI+NF, MB=MB and SK=SK. (It confused me when I started here.)

      --

      I can spell. I just can't type.

    10. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Jboy_24 · · Score: 1

      In the San Francisco Bay area, there exists a company called MetroPCS, where for $35/mnth you get unlimited local calls in the bay area.

      Cons Roaming is extremely expensive, $1.99/minute
      Doesn't work in Canada (Go Canucks Go!)

      MetroPCS seems to be doing quite well...

    11. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by legojenn · · Score: 1
      We even have the East Coast Music Awards there, which definitely exclude Ontario and Quebec, and anything further west.

      I could just imagine the awards (and watch my karma fade away)

      Best solo male fiddle
      Best paedophile fiddler
      Best fiddle duet
      Best duelling fiddles
      Best performance by Rita McNeil with fiddles

      Best non-fiddle performance....oops, no nominees

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    12. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by thexdane · · Score: 1

      funny since i've had a cell phone in canada, which has been on and off for over 10 years, the cost has actually gone down or stayed around the same

      i had a free nights and weekends deal with bell mobility a few years agao, before the digital networks and my plan cost me $50, when digital came out it cost lots of money, now i got a free nights and weekends with telus deal and it costs me *drum roll* $40

      if i do my math correctly 40 is less than 50 but i could be wrong

      as for that CityFido program bell mobility has had that ability since about 96 or 97 in ontario and if i remember my company history fido wasn't around in 96 and neither was telus, it was just bell mobility and another company that i forget but they became rogers/at&t

    13. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 1
      Hey, you'd better watch it. I live in Ottawa too, not far from Algonquin College. You wouldn't want me to come down there with my fiddle and play a tune on you. (=

      Also, for your information:

      Halifax is more of an alt-rock scene, little fiddling

      As far as I know, Ontario has far more pedophiles per capita than Nova Scotia.

      There is no such thing as a good Rita McNeil performance, so there can't be a best one.

    14. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by AcidComplex · · Score: 1

      What are you nuts?, City Fido is garbage not only do they fail to tell there customers that there is a 5000 min/month cap on city fido's "unlimited offer" yes 5g's is alot of minutes but they should still tell their clients this in advance.

      As far as it being sustainable,ha good luck, I have seen umpteen number of clients leave tm network and come back to Telus within a month, maybe it's because for every one tower that fido has telus has 25,coverage is undeniable with telus.

      Telus could indeed do the same "unlimited offer" but we have no neeed to our clients understand that, you get what you pay for and dont mind paying a little more for extremely better coverage and superior client support, Ranked number 1 in Canada I might add.

      In regards to clients not having many accounts with 4 or 5 lines, you have obviously not researched canadian companies as many companies have well over 300 phones with telus,not including lands lines,dsl,webhosting.

      And Yes I am a telus CSR.
      Good day :) I just love debates

    15. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "superior client support"

      Bwahahahahaha. I switched away from Telus specifically because the customer service was complete shit. Not only were they rude, they outright lied to me in order to get my business. It was like I was buying a used car or something.

    16. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by AcidComplex · · Score: 1

      dont not confuse, Telus with Telus Mobility as they are two completley seperate companies as any one smarter than a beer bottle would know :)

    17. Re:I work for a Canadian wireless provider... by WinterpegCanuck · · Score: 1

      From an operational perspective, the wireless and wireline businesses of both Bell Mobility and Telus Mobility are entirely separate. One side doesn't pay much attention to the other.

      This isn't exactly the case. The sacred Darrin of TELOOS (insert german salute here) sees over all of telus, POTS and mobilitiy, and I am guessing there is a much larger margin providing service on the existing land delivery equipment than the construction of an wireless network that can handle the traffic. Trust me, they bought out my company and (all angst about that aside) they are quite good at bundleing extra charges for services that you may or may not of requested onto your bill, and there are just more options for land phones.

      Just my 2 cents
      Richard

  75. You forgot to add System Access Fee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides monthly fee charged by the provider, Canadian have to pay for SAF ($7) and 911 fee ($0.25). There are no such fee in US.

  76. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  77. I know the reason... by graveyardduckx · · Score: 0

    They have to charge more because the techs that install towers didn't want to go near Celine Dion's house.

  78. someone had to say it by McAddress · · Score: 2, Funny

    Im canadian, you insensitive clod.

  79. Phone not service plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article compare prices of phones not service plan

  80. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  81. "C" is for "Competition" by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    Prices for everything connected to cell phone service in the USA have taken a nose dive recently because number portablity went into effect, and every carrier has been doing their best to try to poach every other carrier's subscribers as a result. That's competition at its best.

    Cell phone service will always have to be a regulated marketplace because always going to be a limit on how many providers can be using the finite resources of wireless frequencies. How effective that regulation turns out to be will always be the deciding factor in how mcuh cell service costs, and how much the celluar providers have to contribute to our puchase of devices in the form of subsidies. It's nice to see that by at least one yardstick of measurement, the FCC must be doing a pretty good job...

  82. We can both win!!! by Xiaotou · · Score: 2, Funny


    You (Canadians) send me prescription drugs, and I (American) send you wireless gear. Everyone saves money!

  83. Australia has 13% AREA coverage by sould · · Score: 1

    (and something like 99% coverage for mobiles)

    From the Department of Communications, etc's website:

    3. How much mobile coverage is there?

    GSM and CDMA networks cover up to 97.5 per cent of the Australian population and 13.7 per cent of the Australian landmass. This is expected to increase to more than 98 per cent coverage of the population and around 18 per cent coverage of the landmass upon completion of the rollout of Commonwealth funded infrastructure under various targeted funding initiatives.

    Satellite mobile phone services cover 100 per cent of the population and landmass, including the external territories.

    1. Re:Australia has 13% AREA coverage by futuramarama · · Score: 1
      Admittedly, I jumped the gun on the 20% figure (it will be only 18% once the new network is in place), but the US still has a larger population (290 million versus 20 million) potentially supporting the network.

      At 13.7%, the Australian system covers about 1 million sq km, compared to the US land mass of 9.6 million sq km. (I used CIA figures for US and Australia )

      So the US system has 1.5 times as many potential users per sq km of coverage. (Interpret the significance of this as you will)

      [Sorry I can't compare the two against Canada, but I couldn't find a land-area mobile coverage percent for Canada. Also, I realise I've used total populations, not mobile user populations, but the CIA site had out-of-date figures ('98 and '00), and I didn't find any better elsewhere.]

      --
      "And that solves the mystery of the missing ring" - Bender
  84. Re:50lu710n by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    How can this company do that? If they know the "secret handshake" it takes to unlock a phone, why can't just anybody do it?

  85. It's not based on country by X · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I checked the price for the 270 here in Los Angeles: $349.99 + a $100 rebate. That works out to $446.51 CDN + $127.55 CDN rebate. Sounds like the Rogers deal is pretty good by comparison.

    The moral of the story: cell phone deals are *very* regional, and while you might be able to get a great deal in one town, you won't find such a great one elsewhere. It has nothing to do with which country you are in.

    --
    sigs are a waste of space
    1. Re:It's not based on country by dan42 · · Score: 1

      You're right! Even time of year can make a huge difference - before Christmas I bought an Audiovox CDM-8600 for CDN$50 and got a $100 store gift cert (put towards a DVD player). Yes I had to sign up with a provider, but I need that anyway if I want to use the phone. This month the $100 bonus is gone.

  86. Enough with the nationalist wedge politics. by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

    Why is Slashdot *constantly* trying to divide it's readership up into nations and pit us against one another? Constantly they do this.

    BTW, I am American and usually I object to the anti-US articles.

  87. more stats please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe we just don't buy as many of the pricey phones as yanks? add in a population smaller than cali and that's going to affect the numbers.

    won't be the only reason, but it'll be in there. for basic phones and basic packages, it's pretty cheap up here. mine was essentially free after package kickback, is about four years old and works fine, has basic msg service etc, and costs $10/mo for a reasonable slice of base time charged at the second.

    i could buy a new phone, but *why*? there's no killer app worth hundreds yet. quite possibly our market doesn't have the same interest in the upper end as in the states, so it's going to cost more for those who want the gucci. the author should not presume we're demographically identical.

  88. Troll, parent post a copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent post is copied from here. Mod down as such.

  89. facts can be obscured by thexdane · · Score: 2, Informative

    well that's all well and good that they say a phone costs this much, but there's one small fact that they're missing ALL canadian providers give you a discount on the phone for a term contract, so in reality you DON'T pay the full price

    all the phones they listed are the base price WITHOUT a package deal, and most of the american conterparts had a thing about it being free with a deal and such

    the thing most people don't realise is that america has 300 million people canada has 30 million. another thing is that most phones aren't made in canada, the blackberry is the exceptoin so there's an import and other such taxes and special chips and such.

  90. One factor by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 1
    I know that many of the more expensive phones, the P800 and Hiptop for example, became available in the US long before they made it into Canada. That may well be the case for all the phones listed.

    Prices are almost always set high initially when a product comes to market, to grab the early adopters willing to pay anything. Then they gradually drop to attract the more price-conscious consumers. So the article is comparing bleading edge Canadian prices, against US prices that have been getting discounted for a while. So of course the US phones are going to be cheaper.

  91. Cell Phones originated by ElliotLee · · Score: 1

    It's mostly Americans/United States people who invented/creacted/developed many technologies that go into cell phones and designed them. If it weren't for the global economy it wouldn't be too surprising for there to be no cell phones in Canada at all.

    1. Re:Cell Phones originated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that Navel looking these days, and your toes? Great to hear it!

    2. Re:Cell Phones originated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats quite funny. Comanies like Nokia, Qualcomm/Kyocerra, Ericson, LG, Samsung are all based in other countries. Motorolla is the ONLY manufacturer I can think of that is actually an American company.

    3. Re:Cell Phones originated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Texas count as United States?

      Nokia R & D
      6000 Connection Dr
      Irving, TX 75039-2600

      Nokia Manufacturing
      5650 Alliance Gateway Fwy
      Fort Worth, TX 76177-3736

      Nokia Manufacturing
      4201 Diplomacy Rd
      Fort Worth, TX 76155-2633

  92. Re:Intense competition in the US, and economic for by jonbrewer · · Score: 1

    the US market probably has more cell phones in the top 20-40 markets then Canada has people period.

    I'd venture to say California has more cell phones than Canada has people.

  93. And Porsches, Mercedes, etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Germans buy their VW's from Italy, but the lucky few buy their upper class Porsches and Mercedes from the USA.

    It's up to 30 percent cheaper for some models.

  94. MOD THIS DOWN _ COPIED POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see AC comment above.

    1. Re:MOD THIS DOWN _ COPIED POST! by CleverMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah! And I wrote the original post (I just happened to not bother to log in).

      Dammit.

  95. Next time I go to Vancouver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will be selling all the cell phones that I can out of the back of red rental car.

    I think Colombia and West Second might be a good place.

  96. Who keeps their phones after the contract expires? by wing03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Something that bugs the crap out of me is the cell phone companies in Canada don't reward you for being a long time customer. I assume it's the same state side.

    Sign up for a 1 or 2 year plan, get a free phone. Once that 1 or 2 years are up, they only offer you either 3 months unlimited calling or a $75 CAD credit towards a new phone at practically full rate.

    If you didn't care and cancelled your service, you could go ahead and get that new phone with a new number.

    But it's annoying as hell to get someone else's old number and all their calls to you for the next six months.

    My contract came up and I love my Nokia 6160. Only complaint is the battery life is shorte. I asked if they could give me the $75 credit towards a new battery, they told me no. Only a new phone would work.

    Needless to say, I went with the upgrade to a 6360 to maintain compatability with most of my accessories.

  97. I know by xRelisH · · Score: 1

    Its those damn beavers chewing on the AP antennas eh.

  98. striving to change my karma by vertigo_ok · · Score: 0

    Its kind of a trade off, eh? I mean, prescription drugs are cheaper in Canada than in the US, but electronics are more expensive, eh? If it weren't for the cold, Canada could become the next Florida or Arizona and attract all the retiring elderly from the US ya know.

    Imagine what that would do for the voter turn out?

    If I were Canadian, I'd just cross the boarder for my cell phone. I think its just a product of economics (less demand, etc) rather than an evil plot to keep Canadians disconnected from the rest of the western world. You betcha.

    -j

    --
    haud servio tui deus neque tui diabolus huad servio tui regalis neque tu
  99. Primus.ca by qualico · · Score: 0

    My computer froze when I went onto the primus.ca web site. Thanks Primus! :- Kinda what I did when I saw the highspeed internet price.

  100. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  101. US = cheap, Canada, Europe = expensive by storem · · Score: 2, Informative
    Isn't it so that US is cheap and all other countries tend to be more expensive? Look at some Belgian prices:
    • Motorola v66i: 239 EUR = $287
    • Nokia 3300: 330 EUR = $396
    • Nokia 6800: 439 EUR = $539
    • Siemens SL55: 449 EUR = $539
    • SonyEricsson T200: 159 EUR = $191
    • SonyEricsson T610: 349 EUR = $419
    • SonyEricsson P800: 849 EUR = $1019

    1 EUR = $1.2
    Actually it would be better not to account the exchange rate. Use 1/1 for comparison.

    These prices don't include a plan. Most quality phones simply don't come with a plan in Belgium. They are more focused on the cheaper phones.

    BTW: Why doesn't /. accept € ?

  102. This is obvious.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You're locked into a multiple-month contract when you think you're buying a "cheap" phone in the USA. Also, the phone will only be usable with the carrier you bought it from.

    In the Canadian model, the phone won't be locked and it truly is "yours". And you don't need to get a new phone every time you change services.

    It's unbelievable that the article author portrays the American model as preferable. You pay the same sum (taking into account that money for those phones has to come from somewhere and that's from your monthly bill!) for less choice. No wonder USA is still in the stone age when it comes to mobile phones.

  103. We get that crap here on landlines by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I have a landline only so that I can have DSL. The phone company will only track DSL circuts by phone number, to force you to have one. Fine, not like phone lines are expensive. The basic monthly charge for a landline is $13.18USD here. Now on top of that there is about 6 taxes, as one would expect, that are for the most part porportional to the amount you pay for service. They total like $3.50. Ok, great..... Then there is a fixed $6.50 "federal access charge". Umm, excuse me? fixed at like half the cost of the line?

    Net effect being you end up paying a total of over $21 for a basic line.

    Long distance providers have something similar, but worse: The Universal Service Fund fee. This is a percentage of your bill, but that percentage is set by the provider. So sometimes you'll have a company that charges less per minute but ends up being more expensive per minute in the end.

    1. Re:We get that crap here on landlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most aren't taxes imposed by govt but fees that the company chooses to charge you separately.
      Just wait for your local supermarket to start charging you a "govt regulation compliance fee."

    2. Re:We get that crap here on landlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like all technology services are out to nickel and dime us to death. For example, I just added my wife to my Sprint contract... ok $20/month for an additional line. She wanted the Vision service to browse the web (ok that bumps it up to $25/month instead) on her lovely new Sanyo 8100 which was only $99 after a $130 instant savings. Oh yes, did I mention that means I get locked into a 2 year contract (my 1 year contract expired next month). Then we had to bump our shared minutes up to over 500 a month because my previous 300 a month (of which I used about 30 minutes a month) didn't qualify for add-a-line. In the end, adding a second line for my wife increased my cell phone bill from $50/month to $95/month. Actually, now that I see that in writing I need to think about cancelling before the 14 day period is up. $45/month more for one more line? She could just get her own line. Sheesh.

  104. Charge more money, because it's about the money by gordguide · · Score: 1

    I always assumed that wireless was some kind of business, with (at least the expectation of) profits as the goal.

    All Canadian Wireless carriers (except Satellite); Source: Industry Canada
    Total net profit (loss) to date:
    1997 :(567.0)
    1998: (743.0)
    1999: (789.7)
    2000: (808.6)
    2001+ (no data, but I sense a trend)

    So, a couple-or-three of $ Billion down the tube, and people still want a $20 phone. Call me crazy, but it seems they're pricing the phones as cheap as they can already.

    1. Re:Charge more money, because it's about the money by gordguide · · Score: 1

      Probably should have added:
      Figures in $C million (currently US$ 785,176.00)

      Even at a mere 800 grand $US to the million, that's a lot of beans down the drain.

  105. Its taxes for lots of equipment by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 1

    Look at Sonystyle.ca vs Sonystyle.com
    Same minidisc player much more in same currency. Same for many of their products. I think I saw the same with microphones.

  106. Because.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are not that smart.

  107. Canadian exchange rates made easy... by Duty · · Score: 1

    When you're in retail business, you can't waste valuable time doing all that math. It's much easier to just double the price.

  108. Pretty short list of phones ... by gordguide · · Score: 1

    I bought my phone last month for $29.95 plus tax right from the phone company. A Canadian phone company. ($C33.84/$US 26.57).

    150 anytime minutes, call display/name display/text messaging; for $29 a month ($US 22.77). 2-year contract. My cell habits are about 60 minutes a month, half of that long distance. They charged me another $2 for last month's long distance (37 minutes).

    I can call to (and receive calls from) any other SaskTel wireless user for free (no airtime charges, doesn't count against my 150 minutes). SaskTel has over 90% of the market province-wide, mostly because Rogers is so inept that nobody (including myself) will stay with them. 3 years with Rogers was more than enough; I can't believe I waited so long to switch. Night and Day.

    I could have bought the phone outright (replace a phone or use prepaid service) for $150 (US $ 117).

    I could have bought an unlocked one for the same price online (3 vendors checked).

    It's a Nokia 3586i.

    For a comprehensive list of Wireless options in Canada, go to I Hate Rogers

    There are a couple of wireless options I could have taken in my area and they were all quite similarly priced. SaskTel has the most towers.

    1. Re:Pretty short list of phones ... by Monkey · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that SaskTel is a government owned crown corporation. Their mandate is to provide high quality services to their voting public, rather than to maximize profit like a true private sector business would be doing.

    2. Re:Pretty short list of phones ... by gordguide · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for that one ...

      " Their mandate is to provide high quality services to their voting public, rather than to maximize profit like a true private sector business would be doing. ..."

      I realize that in many places that's the rationale used. However, that is exactly the wrong rationale. Crowns must be self-sufficent and well managed or they should be sold off to someone who can try to do a better job.

      They should provide a real need that private enterprise cannot or will not step in to provide. They are not charities, and they should never cost the taxpayer money that cannot be justified from a business perspective (ie future return on investment).

      There are many examples that fail those criteria; the sooner they are wound down or sold the better.

      SaskTel is self-sufficent, has paid a cash dividend for more than 50 consecutive years (lately in the $100-200 million a year range) and wouldn't even exist if private phone companies would have bothered to sell someone a phone line in western Canada for the first 50 years of the last century.

      Manitoba Tel; SaskTel, Alberta Government Telephones and BCTel were all publicly owned because private sector phone companies were unwilling to set up a phone network west of the Ontario/Manitoba border.

      Most were formed in the 1930's to 1940's because people had simply waited long enough. Bell Canada and US telecos were offered cash, tax incentives, free land and other incentives, but refused to build phone networks "in the middle of nowhere".

      Alberta and BC were dragged into the telephone business screaming and kicking; and were managed by governments that believed they had shit the bed by starting up a Crown in the first place. Mostly under-capitalized, they were unprofitable, poorly managed, and were sold to the private sector at a loss (together they are what is now Telus).

      This is as it should be; there's no room for a half-hearted enterprise in the public or private sector. Let someone who cares run it.

      MBTel was well run, had adequate capital from profit, and debt free. It did not regularly provide dividends to the public treasury but was none-the-less not a financial drain either. It was sold at an excellent return to the taxpayers during the 90's.

      SaskTel is still a Crown, is profitable, well run, and has adequate capital from revenue and assets vastly exceed liabilities. No crown should be operated in any other way.

      There are many who believe such an enterprise should be sold (all Canadian communications companies see it as a drool-worthy asset) just as there are many who are uncomfortable with government ownership of a company that is profitable.

      Having said that, the fact remains that public ownership is no excuse for poor management, and profit is absolutely essential to justify long-term investment. It is rare because of political realities, not because nobody knows how to do it right.

      There are so few good examples of Crowns because there are many who would like to deliberately cripple the corporation so as to introduce losses; thereby making the selling of the asset popular with the taxpayer. With a nice surplus (but missing those dividends) they can buy the next election and doom the following government into being forced to raise taxes. It's really quite simple, and it's been played out many times.

      Conservatives always get elected from time to time and view crowns much like a corporate raider views some cash or asset-rich but troubled firms. Not only that, but those who elected them are sure to support anything that might enrich the treasury or lower taxes in the short term. It's Win-Win.

      Without very strong support from the electorate few Crowns can survive the long term. ("But the pension fund was just sitting there." -Duke, Doonsbury)

      To properly manage any Crown asset it's also essential that all government be well run; it's inconceivable that California would not sell a public telephone

  109. Because *something* has to fund uber-cheap DSL... by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    Our ADSL is way cheaper and way faster than yours. And more importantly, the big providers are trying to kill each other at any cost. So they're selling a $45 service for only $30, funded primarily by their shareholders and their respective monopolies on cable and telephone service.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  110. SURCHARGES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just looked at the cost of sucharges. On their cheapes plan, ATT charges an astronomical 69c for extra minutes, on a comparable plan from Bell the rate is 25c per minute. Its these surcharges that really get you.

    Anyone that has worked in retail also understands that someone buying 18k cell phones will get a better deal from the manufacturer than the guy buying 1800 or 1000.

  111. Such is life in the Great White North by Curtman · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the CRTC has its regulatory fingers in the Cell carriers pockets too. I'm still not sure how they justify taking my money and passing it off to Canadian artists even though I've burned maybe 3 audio cd's in my lifetime.

    Memorex 100-Pack 48x CD-R Disc Spindle (Mfr. Part Number 3202-4581)
    USA = $37.99 ($48.38 CDN)
    Canada = $79.99 CDN

    (Future Shop is owned by Best Buy BTW)

  112. Depends on your needs by trajano · · Score: 1

    I live in the Toronto area so using Fido's network is sufficient for me. It depends on your needs. But I do not buy Fido phones, Fido was one of the first companies that supported SimCards which allowed me to use phones that I purchase and like (provided it was unlocked) and not get locked in because of the phone.

    I also use the pre-paid plan. I basically pay around $10 per month, with the remaining time rolled over. Sure the price per minute is more expensive, but if you do not tend to use it much its a pretty good deal.

    --
    Archie - CIO-for-hire :-)
  113. Europe is much cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Competition in Europe has really pushed down prices. Here in the UK I just bought a P900 for 70 with a 12 month contact of 45/month (400 mins/month to any other land line or mobile).

  114. Re:Europe is much cheaper (prices in GBP) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Competition in Europe has really pushed down prices. Here in the UK I just bought a P900 for 70 GBP with a 12 month contact of 45 GBP/month (400 mins/month to any other land line or mobile).

  115. Conspiracy Theory by hwestiii · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Canadian wireless prices are under the influence of the same shadowy forces responsible for American pharmaceutical prices.

  116. I remember ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once talking to a group of people from all over the world (IRC), and it seemed all the Germans had their own cell phones (apparently it is *very* common over there), as did a lot of Americans. Canadians on the other hand (I don't know what it is), there is not much of a demand for wireless services. Just a few weeks ago a friend of mine received a cell phone from his parents and his reaction was "Why do I need this? How much is this going to cost me?" It turned out to be one of those "Pay-as-you-Go" which in my opinion has a good intention but is a complete rip off. Also a couple weeks ago I got a good deal from BAKA wireless (who uses Bell Mobility services and towers). I paid about $15 for the phone (AudioVox something-or-other) with free activation. The montly fee is $20 a month (CAD) with free weekends, 250 anytime minutes, free voicemail, call forwarding, caller ID, etc. In my opinion, that is a kick ass deal. And yes it's digital reception.

    So how often do I use it? Honestly, almost never. Usually whenever I'm out and need to make a call, I pump a quarter into the closest pay phone. Why? I have my reasons:

    1) Delay. Altough it's only about a 0.25 voice delay, it's really noticable (to me) and I find it really hard to have a decent conversation without constantly cutting eachother off.

    2) Can't hear my voice. I've actually got laughed at for this reason many times, but is it just me, or it is so much easier talking on a regular phone because you can hear your voice as you talk? To me it's like confirmation that the person on the other line can hear me. On a cell phone it is a little awkward to me, almost like talking to a wall and not sure if it's going to respond and constantly confirming "Hello are you still there?"

  117. It's the dollar - the soon to be ex #1 currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is only a temporary setback whilst global trade switches from Dollars to Euros, then global cash reserves will be in Euros and not Dollars. Canadians should be able to pay the same as Americans, but not Europeans who will of couse be the ones paying less (and therefore getting the credit for their 'better' economy)!

  118. Sorry to hear about the cost of the phones, but... by bennomatic · · Score: 1
    At least they have universal health care!

    And I'd love to see a price comparison between homes in the SF Bay Area to homes in even relatively populated areas like Victoria, BC. What's a few hundred bux when you're getting a home for 1/10th the cost? Who's really getting hosed here?

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  119. The answer is simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taxes matter.

  120. List prices are meaningless by gvc · · Score: 1

    I just got a Motorola phone from Fido for $12 net,
    Including 12V car power supply and headphones. (from Telephone Booth). The only plan requirement is 3 months at $25/mo.

    Linksys 802.11b routers can often be had for $79 at Staples/Future Shop.

    Brand-X 802.11b router plus USB adapter $90 a Costco.

    These are Canadian Dollars, so multiply by 0.80 for U.S.

  121. Canada = More Expensive. by lintocs · · Score: 1

    I don't know where the rest of these so called Canadians have been living all their lives, but let me tell you, EVERYTHING is more expensive here. It's the Canadian way, for Christ's sake.

    Example: Comprehensive health care for a family of four in most parts of the US is about 6000$ a year. I pay more than 20000$ just for myself, and I should count myself luckly if I can get to see a doctor within two weeks, and a specialist within a year.

    Why are cell phones more expensive in Canada? Socialism. I have no doubt there are at least fourteen hidden taxes from the various levels of government buried in the price of every damn thing I buy.

  122. Sounds logical by SassyDave · · Score: 1

    Looks like Canadian wireless subscribers have been getting hosed

    Must be those hoser bureaucrats, eh?

    Sorry, couldn't resist.

  123. here in korea... by fredrickleo · · Score: 1

    its interesting here in korea, 44 million people in a country the size of ohio, everyone has cell phones (CDMA2000) and everyone is tightly packed into a few major cities... the phones are only barely subsidized if at all ! the colour ones cost between (approx) $400 and $600 ! oh and service isnt that cheap either, I think my girlfriend pays around $100 a month for her service... but shes an odd case, I think most people pay around $50.

    --
    Yay me! ^^
  124. Hmm, For once the UK sounds cheaper! by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

    Looking at those prices, the equivelent phones are still cheaper than the US over here in the UK!

    And before you say the words "Plan" well even OFF a plan, those same phones are *much* cheaper here. and on a plan, we get many phones for free what you have to pay through your teeth.

    Competition really works..

    --
    Have a nice day!
  125. sucks to be you, I guess by budhaboy · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the Supply side Jesus is punishing you for allowing your government to negotiate cheap drugs.

  126. Sounds like a business opportunity... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    1. Trade American cell phones for Canadian Viagra 2. ??? 3. Profit!

  127. The Perfect Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    *holds up sign reading: "Will Trade WIFI for Drugs"*

  128. Wireless data fees and bandwidth by tamarian · · Score: 2, Informative

    I subscribe to data only, "unlimited" GPRS plan from Fido @ $60 /month.

    I just got a mail from Fido that the unlimited plan has a limit of 1 gigabyte per month. Their lettre allowed me up to the end of the month to "correct" my usage or "you will be contacted to help you limit your usage".

    Now, $60 a month for 1 Gig total may sound like an overkill, and it is considering that in Canada you pay only CDN$ 44/month for unlimited high speed cable connection downloading ISO's in less than an hour, but other wireless providers, like Bell, Tellus and AT&T Rogers, charge $10 per megabyte. Most don't offer a limited "unlimited" plans, and some offer an unlimited period for the first couple of months as a promotion.

    If you monitor a remote server, and leave "top" running 24 hrs a day, you'll break the one gig limit within a couple of days.

    Now I started to switch cards on my Zaurus, GPRS card when no Wifi siganl is available, and switch to Wifi when I find it. It's a PITA to try to stay within the unlimited limit. It's a hassle, since it will break your SSH connection, and need to reconnect.

    As for hardware, the few wireless providers here in Canada who know what a CF card format is, charge $400-$500 dollars for them, and they all have firmware to not be compatible with any other provider. The only exception I found is Fido, where I was able to purchase a card from the US on eBay, and plug into the Fido GPRS network. It only took me 3 phone calls to convince the tech support I don't need to purchase any phones from them, and that my CF card works just like their own PCMCIA cards.

    Of course, you can subscribe to US providers from Canada, however you'll be paying roaming fees, so it's not that practical.

  129. HIPTOP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, BUT... consider the hiptop. The "sidekick" useres in the states already have a software upgrade, which we do not, and they have WAY cheaper plans, which we also don't have. Fido's unlimited GPRS packages rings in at about 50$ CDN, whereas some basic plans in the states cover that AND call minutes for less money.

    Obviously they charge us up-the-bum for these services becuase, as others have said, there aren't many people to make money off of, so they need to make more money off fewer customers, and it's especially apparent with a bizzarre device like the hiptop.

    Considering tho, the Fido hiptop was on promotion for only 250$ and that doesn't lock you to a contract, I'd say it's a pretty good deal compared to our southern brethren. (wo do have contracts, and pay more for the phone, etc. etc.)

    1. Re:HIPTOP! by Doctor · · Score: 1

      I believe Fido is coming out with a special unlimited GPRS package specifically for the Hiptop before the end of January.

      I heard firmware updates are coming too.

    2. Re:HIPTOP! by DominicDuval · · Score: 1

      I've been using their 50$ unlimited GPRS internet access from my laptop for one year now.

      Works perfectly anywhere in Canada and the United States (some parts of latin America are supported as well I believe), without any other charges. For someone who travels a lot (my case), that deal is unbeatable. Oh, and it works on Linux too :)

      I also don't totally agree with the article content. All my communication needs are using the Fido wireless network, and it's not considerably more expensive than old-fashioned land lines. Might depend on your needs though.

      My 0.02$

  130. always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know, now i guess this is why they've called them "hosers". i never understood that...

  131. We get hosed on almost everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coming across the border. Greedy American (redundant?) companies mark up the prices well beyond the exchange rate because they think we won't notice.

  132. The original poster is ON Rogers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He wants to switch. His only GSM Option is FIDO. Do try and follow the thread.

  133. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If this is the level of discourse, and I'm referring to the people that actually had something to say, not the trolls, then this site is sadly in need of new contributors and posters.

    1.) TCO hello? Hello! here is a link to my cell companies phones and here to their monthly packages.

    This is a listing from one monthly package, if you don't want to click.

    Long Distance - $45 per month
    400 anytime minutes (Billed by the second)
    250 minutes of long distance within Canada and to the U.S.
    50% discount on (other)international long-distance rates
    Voice Messaging with Instant Reply
    Call Display
    (other)Included services
    Call Waiting, Call Forwarding, Conference Call, Text Messaging, Instant Messaging, E-Mail Messaging, Information Messaging, Entertainment Messaging, Mobile Internet


    The minutes are billed by the second, this means if you make five 12 second calls, you may not have gone over the first minute and it'll cost about ten cents, Canadian, for all five.(Hi honey, I'm on my way. Anything I can pick up? - No, I've ordered Thai food and we're set for the movie at eight, should I open the wine, or should we have beer? - Beer's better with Thai, see you in twenty. - Bye. - Bye.)
    There is no monthly contract, you can quit anytime you like. Or call them up and change the plan on a moments notice.
    "Starting next billing period I'm going to be with an American client and we'll be calling the states for a lot of checkups, put me on the long distance plan for a month." (Oh that gives you 4 hours and ten minutes of long distance for five bucks.)
    TCO Total Cost of Ownership Hello??!!?
    And our healthcare is free too.
  134. Government Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are only four cell phone companies in Canada because the Canadian government decided only four companies would be given spectrum licenses. The government said that if there were more than four companies there would be too much competition and if there were less than four companies there would not be enough comptetion. Yeah, free markets!

  135. Quit whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadians get drugs almost for free, that are made in the US, and are priced so high in the US that most Americans can't afford to buy without insurance (and even then the costs drive many people into the poorhouse). So Canadians have to pay a little more for a phone than Americans? Wahhh... Quit whining already.

  136. The answer is simple... by KennyP · · Score: 1

    It's because they're Canadian!

    They let their best friend get into a fight and won't even help out!

    It's a good thing for them they make Labatt's Blue and Molsen Golden, or we would have nuked them back into the stone age years ago!

    Kenny P.
    Visualize Whirled P.'s

    1. Re:The answer is simple... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

      um... who said you were our best friend? You?

  137. Re:Sorry to hear about the cost of the phones, but by tpr · · Score: 1

    Not 1/10th - more like 1/4. It _was_ 1/5th until odious george's brilliant handling of the us economy crashed the USD so badly.

    It's still enough that I'm moving up to (near) Victoria tomorrow. No mortgage, no need to worry about making huge bux. No Ahnold, no george, no rude SFBA drivers.

  138. Trade Agreement by herlitz · · Score: 1

    Maybe we can work out some trade agreement where we in the US can get cheap prescription drugs from Canada for our cheap wireless equipment.

  139. Re:Sorry to hear about the cost of the phones, but by bennomatic · · Score: 1

    It sounds WONderful. Need a roommate or two? I can play guitar and my fiancee is a great cook if you like vegetarian food...

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  140. Win some, lose some. by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    I'll pay twice as much for my handset up front, but I could leave it on while I drive across the country, west coast to east, and not be dinged for "roaming" fees from an unscrupulous little provider in the middle of a highway somewhere...

    1. Re:Win some, lose some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is especially true when going through areas owned by Cellular 1 of Amarillo. It seems that they and cingular own most of the towers in the Potter/Randall counties in TX. Roaming through their area costs 5x-6x the average nationwide. They are the reasons I decided to learn how to reprogram MY cell phone to NEVER use their SIDs when roaming...

    2. Re:Win some, lose some. by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that... I was actually referring to horror stories I'd heard from someone's business trip to Texas. @_@;

      In Western Canada here, it's pretty much all Telus or Rogers, the latter stretches across Canada. Not much choice, but decent rates, and never a second thought about roaming. (actually I get local rates for local calls in other cities if I dial the area code first since my provider owns towers everywhere I go. :D)

  141. Prove It by stryc9 · · Score: 1
    To all that say that there are less phone customers per tower/area/provider than in the US and that is why we pay more I want to see some proof.

    Not that I think you are wrong, you could be very right, but I want to see it. I like tangible results from surveys and corp data that I can see and touch. Otherwise, the arguement makes no sense.

    I think that we have more purple monsters with green striped hair in Canada than in the US. And I know that these monsters directly influence wireless purchase pricing, well cause I said so.

    Dont laugh, your arguement, without proof, is no better. Slashdotters really need a logic lesson. Just cause it makes sense and more people agree with you than with others, doesn't mean that you are right.

    --
    www.madeofwinandawesome.com
  142. Are you on glue? by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    Comprehensive health care for a family of four in most parts of the US is about 6000$ a year. I pay more than 20000$ just for myself I don't know what Canada you're living in, but you pay nothing in mine... You do pay general taxes, part of which pays for your health care. The US spends more on health care than Canada... and they don't even cover everyone.

  143. you retard by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    Nokia is from Finland.

    From their website:

    Nokia Head Office

    Keilalahdentie 2-4
    P.O. Box 226
    FIN-00045 Nokia Group
    Finland
    Tel. +358 7180 08000

  144. it's the Canadian way by Zapraki · · Score: 0

    This is what I as a proud Canuck call the "we Canadians get the shaft and we're too passive to do anything about it" syndrome. Now, if it involved hockey/healthcare/toques/etc. THEN we'd get angry.

  145. Hosed in the US too, WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the US, every cell phone you buy is carrier locked; additionally, phones can only be purchased from carriers. Any chance there are any anti-trust issues regarding these practices?

  146. Re:Basic economics...cop-out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada has over 30 million people most reside in less than 20% of the country. In a city like Calgary, Vancouver, Toronto - people are just as densely populated as in US cities. In fact, many US cities are less densely populated than their Canadian counterparts. Take Calgary with millions of empty acres parsing out lots with 30 foot frontages and 70 foot depths. In the US these are slum sized lots.

    The real issue is government sponsored monoplies like Bell, Shaw, Telus and Rogers. It is a lack of competition and not a economic scale issue.

    If the Canadian government would truly open up competition in telephone and cable companies prices would drop fast. There are multiple artifical bariers against a competative environment. But the government likes the kickbacks.

  147. Do you have flush toilets out there? by Rix · · Score: 1

    Mission is no where near Vancouver. It's one of those scary places we keep our religious wackos so they'll only hurt each other.

  148. Re:50lu710n by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

    Interesting! I know that when I was looking into buying a phone that I could bring home the only options were priced around 200GBP+ ($450-500CDN). Maybe your post will be helpful to some other readers.