Slashdot Mirror


A Linux Machine For Your Collar

MadSaxon writes "gumstix.org has a brief but titillating description of a very small Linux machine based on the PXA255: 20 x 80 mm, '64MB SDRAM, 4MB Flash, MMC/SD/SDIO slot, and power management. It takes 3.6V - 5.0V power, and has been drawing under 200 mA.' It weighs less than 12g sans battery, and 'can fit in a collar undetected.' Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?"

318 comments

  1. Laundry advice? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    So, if your collar is wired, do you dry clean?

    You've got token ring around the collar!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Laundry advice? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny
      I think it a poor description. The people who'd be interested in something like this rarely wear anything but T-shirts...

      Unless they mean a collar with a buckle and a D-ring...

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:Laundry advice? by lucas.clemente · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Gimme a break. No specs, No details, no video of it in action, its fake people.

      --
      Long Live OSX!
    3. Re:Laundry advice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Linux

      Bash ...should both be compatible.

    4. Re:Laundry advice? by dj245 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      It'd be just like being strangled by a midget trying to get a piggyback!

      -Dave Atell

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    5. Re:Laundry advice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Interested in it and I don't wear anything.

      Where would I put it?

  2. This by deliciousmonster · · Score: 0, Troll

    Rhymes with "betarded"

    --
    I have a plan. Using mainly spoons, we'll tunnel our way out of the city...
    1. Re:This by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Funny

      How is this letarded? It seems quiet clever to me... Oh, wait, you meant the other rhyme...

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:This by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Q:What's the limiting factor for pocket computers?

      A:The size of your pockets!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:This by yiantsbro · · Score: 1

      No, just because it isn't a final product doesn't mean it has been 'discarded' already. Damn, you must be retarded.

  3. Ninnle Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Ninnle Linux run on my collar?

  4. What Distro ? by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 4, Funny

    Red Neck Hat?

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:What Distro ? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      Red Neck Hat?

      Memo to the PHB: We need to downsize, again. If the fire sprinklers go off in the cube farm, how many staff will be electocuted?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:What Distro ? by ajrs · · Score: 3, Funny

      Black Tie Linux. Black Tie is an elegant distro based on Debian, but its users tend to be exclusive.

    3. Re:What Distro ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you're a geek who has been reading too much S&M fiction when a story title like this turns you on.

      Posted as Anon for my own safety.

    4. Re:What Distro ? by mbadolato · · Score: 1

      If you're wearing an old shirt, do you need to worry about Token Ring around the collar?

  5. what about the laundry challenge by ItalianScallion · · Score: 1

    to get rid of sonnet ring around the collar?

  6. my goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    if it's bluetooth capable, it takes new meaning to being a blue collar professional. ;-)

    1. Re:my goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cracking thus becomes blue-collar crime. About time. The emphasis lately on white-collar crime has been positively racist.

  7. Wearable Linux by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure there's a "Slacksware" joke in here somewhere, but I'm not quite awake enough to make it. :)

    --
    These sigs are more interesting tha
    1. Re:Wearable Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Excuse me, but is that Linux in your pocket...?

    2. Re:Wearable Linux by JRSiebz · · Score: 1

      i think you meant "Neckware" :-D

    3. Re:Wearable Linux by hardcode57 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you mean 'is that a gnu in your pocket?'

    4. Re:Wearable Linux by Jorkapp · · Score: 1

      That would be interesting...

      "Is that a Slackware in your pocket? Or are you just happy to see me?"

      --
      Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
  8. Collar? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok.. why? I mean is there something about being in a collar that being in a pocket or a belt buckle can't do?

    --
    Dyolf Knip
    1. Re:Collar? by gt384u · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, you do most of your communication and perception through your head. While I'm sure that lots of very low power nifty stuff with regards to effective, cheap wireless eyepieces and earpieces will come out at some point, I imagine that putting it in your collar would require running wires/rf signals over much shorter distances. Plus, it's PRIME untapped body real estate! Everybody knows that your pockets are already filled with crap and who has time to wear a belt these days?

    2. Re:Collar? by Dav3K · · Score: 1

      Two words, buddy:

      Electroshock Therapy

    3. Re:Collar? by Burstgoof · · Score: 1

      "Let me just unbuckle your......computer?"

    4. Re:Collar? by itwerx · · Score: 1

      Dyolf Knip: ...is there something about being in a collar that being in a pocket or a belt buckle can't do?

      gt384u: ...Last I checked, you do most of your communication and perception through your head.

      Judging by some of the trolls on here there are fucks, um, I mean "folks", who do most of their communication and perception through their pocket and belt buckle!

    5. Re:Collar? by pagercam2 · · Score: 1

      Well yes, look at cellphones cables drive people crazy getting caught, being in the way etc... Wireless has attempted to fix this with bluetooth but that just means another battery to run down, why replace a $1 headset with a $70 radio, economics and hassle just don't justify it. If the device could be smaller and closer to the users I/o ports (ears eyes etc...) then short cables would be fine. Pockets and belt clips aren't universal so that doesn't help much. Keeping the device within close proximity makes this so much easier and less prone to damage. So yes a collar mount would ba HUGE benifit.

  9. Management by petabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

    I see management giving all their employee's one of these. Well, right after the little shock module is released for it.

    "Slashdoting again?!" ... *ZAP*

    1. Re:Management by nizo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Actually I keep waiting for the opposite to be released. I think it was a NOVA episode that had this little rat pressing a bar, which would in turn stimulate the pleasure center in his brain (needless to say, the rat was a little white blur as he pressed that bar, even forgoing eating if I recall correctly. Think one long continual orgasm). Anyway, I keep waiting for some company to release something like this for people. The upside would be things like exercise could be made to be lots more fun, but I suppose that people sitting in their chairs at home pressing a button until they starve to death might keep something like this from making it past the FDA.

    2. Re:Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know you were joking, but I'm up to my ears of seeing my employees chatting on IRC and browsing Slashdot and then quickly hiding the client/browser whenever I walk by.

      "Attention employees, this is your manager speaking. We will keep administering electroshocks until your morale improves!". One can dream...

    3. Re:Management by Michalson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually there is a company that has designed such a device for women, however it requires a surgical implant to work (it's controlled by a remote). Last I heard they where having trouble getting it to market because they couldn't find any willing test subjects.

  10. What about my brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does weigh less, just 0 grams and no need for batteries, it r0x!

    1. Re:What about my brain? by dtl · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean it does 'way less' don't you...

    2. Re:What about my brain? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, your brain has a mass that is a hell of a lot more than this thing. However, seeing as this thing is technically a peripheral of your brain, it means that not having it means not having any EXCESS weight/mass.

  11. Ohh sexy jewelry :o) by kyknos.org · · Score: 1

    I want this one in silver for my girlfriend :o)

    --

    SHE does throw dice.
    1. Re:Ohh sexy jewelry :o) by paranode · · Score: 3, Funny

      I want this one in silver for my girlfriend

      I believe you are referring to Mrs. R. Hand?

      Yes we are all quite familiar with her, I don't think she cares for jewelry.

    2. Re:Ohh sexy jewelry :o) by KrancHammer · · Score: 1


      So, a bracelet then... or perhaps a ring?
      j/k

      --
      Trolls: The high-tech version of those morons that scrawl obscenities in public bathrooms.
    3. Re:Ohh sexy jewelry :o) by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oh, I don't know. I heard she likes a pearl necklace...

      Could be Perl necklace in this context though

    4. Re:Ohh sexy jewelry :o) by kyknos.org · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are wrong. While Internet descended from US Arpanet network, WWW itself is an European invention. Invented at CERN laboratory, Switzerland. ---

      --

      SHE does throw dice.
    5. Re:Ohh sexy jewelry :o) by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Doh! Your absolutely right! I totally forgot about that!

      World-Wide Web (WWW) released by CERN; Tim Berners-Lee developer (:pb1:). First Web server is nxoc01.cern.ch, launched in Nov 1990 and later renamed info.cern.ch.

      My mistake! Have a great day!

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    6. Re:Ohh sexy jewelry :o) by maetenloch · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. While Internet descended from US Arpanet network, WWW itself is an European invention. Invented at CERN laboratory, Switzerland. ---
      As an European, I am aware of two historical mistakes of my nation - to colonize America and to give Americans the Web.


      [Sigh. This is probably a troll, but I...cannot...resist...]

      First of all, Europe is not a nation, at least not yet. While the European Union is moving towards some kind of political integration, it's still a good ways off (no single political structure, no unified military, no single constitution, voting membership in the UN, etc.).

      Secondly 'Europe' did not colonize America - England, Spain, France, and others nations of the time did.

      Technically, the WWW (i.e. HTML and HTTP) was invented by Tim Berners-Lee in Europe (in Switzerland to be exact). While WWW is synonymous with the internet in most people's mind, remember that telnet, ftp, smtp, nntp, and gopher existed before http. In fact I believe they still account for the majority of traffic at the physical layer.

    7. Re:Ohh sexy jewelry :o) by Doubting+Thomas · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that most of the noteworthy early work on HTTP client and server implementations, on various measures of technical worth, completeness, and market penetration (ie, NCSA, Netscape, Microsoft) were all created where? That's right, in the United States.

      The only code contribution from CERN, the httplib, was proof of concept at best. There was much nashing of teeth to be heard by anyone who had to work with, and more importantly, bug fix, that code.

      --
      Just because it works, doesn't mean it isn't broken.
    8. Re:Ohh sexy jewelry :o) by kyknos.org · · Score: 1

      Nationality is what you feel, it is nothing oficial or dependent on any government. more and more people in Euroe feels to be of European nationality every year. Mostly young people. And most importantly, my blood is of three European official nations, so European is best approximation of my nationality possible :o)

      --

      SHE does throw dice.
    9. Re:Ohh sexy jewelry :o) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does all of this sound like the last desperate gasps of a dying empire?

  12. Neat item by grub · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So many possibilties:

    Link to these lie-detector glasses for better detection.

    Card counting in Vegas.

    Covert recording of conversations (low bitrate MP3?)

    The chicks. Well.. maybe not the chicks..

    Anyhow, this is moot. I can't recall the last time I wore a shirt with a collar.. :)

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Neat item by KDan · · Score: 1

      The chicks. Well.. maybe not the chicks.

      Maybe a random chat-up line picker software? Or even a small AI if you're just that thick..!

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    2. Re:Neat item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, a use for Perl's Bone::Easy module.

    3. Re:Neat item by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      The chicks. Well.. maybe not the chicks.. Thats small enough to fit in a vib.. Nevermind..

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    4. Re:Neat item by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      http://www-ai.ijs.si/eliza/eliza.html

      Port this too it. You'll no longer have a problem with conversation!

    5. Re:Neat item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link to these lie-detector glasses for better detection.

      Maybe...

      Card counting in Vegas.

      Surely there are simplier, cheaper, and smaller devices. Maybe a basic-stamp or probably even smaller and cheaper would just be some regular 'ol surface mounted discrete logic junk.

      Covert recording of conversations (low bitrate MP3?)

      There are tons of devices for doing this that are much smaller. Mic, A/D converter, some storage, that's all that is needed. Tiny.

      The chicks. Well.. maybe not the chicks..

      The chick you want will enjoy this. The others are just fluff.

    6. Re:Neat item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chick you want will enjoy this. The others are just fluff.

      Congratulations on living in happy magical fun land, where all the geek chicks apparently live.

    7. Re:Neat item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyhow, this is moot. I can't recall the last time I wore a shirt with a collar.. :)

      about the last time you had a job.

      Yes I mean that one where you dont say "you want fries with that?"

    8. Re:Neat item by Justice8096 · · Score: 1

      Oh, go on, we know you want to say something about really "personal" appliances... :-)
      And with Bluetooth, you aren't just limited to one place.... you can finally have rhythm...
      Now, think of a more responsive prosthetic penile implant, or prosthetic breasts....

  13. What kind of collar? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    Is this like a shirt collar, or a big studded leather gothy/BSDM kind of collar?

    1. Re:What kind of collar? by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 4, Funny
      or a big studded leather gothy/BSDM kind of collar?

      "Slave you've been bad. Do you know what happens to bad boys?!"

      "No Mistress, but wait let me google it..."

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    2. Re:What kind of collar? by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Ahh. Call of the Calla. Can't wait for 6 and 7, coming out this year!

    3. Re:What kind of collar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is this like a shirt collar, or a big studded leather gothy/BSDM kind of collar?

      Well... the BDSM kind of collar might explain why MadSaxon found it so "titillating".

    4. Re:What kind of collar? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I don't care to think about that...

  14. Well by paranode · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?

    Does Linux have SCO IP in it? ;)

  15. putting it all together by tazanator · · Score: 1

    we get collor computers that use the water from washing to recharge the fuel cell battery and and ear clip/gps reciever ... MAN i NEED THIS for my dog! I'd never lose him!

    --
    I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
    1. Re:putting it all together by tazanator · · Score: 1

      and the \. line .... I lost my dog you insesitive clod!!!!

      --
      I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
  16. Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Collar computing? Sounds scary. What if it shocks you? The neck is the most important part of the body. Or, first it might become ubiquitous, like Linux PCs, then they'll become mandatory, and then they'll be used for tracking purposes. These are the kinds of things with up which we shall not put! Instead of trying this technology out, let's keep it on the safe side and never use it.

  17. Big thing ? by Aliencow · · Score: 1

    Well if this could be the next big thing...it won't fit under a collar anymore! /obvious

  18. Woof by vaccum+pony · · Score: 0

    Does this mean I can walk my dog from my computer?

  19. Could be illegal in Texas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you'd have to do is encase it in silicone and you'd have a computer could be worn even less detectably. "Plug compatible", anyone? Imagine the jokes: - Not just I/O, but I/Ohhhhhh! - "Is that an ARM in your pocket, or are you happy to see me?"

  20. Battery? by sik0fewl · · Score: 1
    It weighs less than 12g sans battery, and 'can fit in a collar undetected.'

    Of course it requires a 12 volt car battery. Imagine wearing that around your neck.

    --
    I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    1. Re:Battery? by satterth · · Score: 1
      Of course it requires a 12 volt car battery. Imagine wearing that around your neck.
      Nope, it requires 3.5v to 5v
      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  21. Can this interface with SPOT technology? by hawks5999 · · Score: 1

    micro-SAMBA?

  22. I can't resist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a beo... eh, nevermind.

  23. Can i? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

    Am I allowed to imagine a beowulf cluster of these? The first beowulf pda?

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    1. Re:Can i? by millahtime · · Score: 0

      SO, could my closet be a boewolf cluster??? Imagine the power in that.

    2. Re:Can i? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't have to imagine actually, it'd look kinda like a tie-rack

    3. Re:Can i? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That would be called a Staff Meeting.

      Bleah!

      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997

  24. Why not wireless? by Sean80 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It has always struck me that putting more and more power close to people is the wrong way to go. Instead, why not make these machines effectively a "dumb terminal" and hook it in the Internet through a wireless connection, where it would interact with web services? Then, you can have a supercomputer on your side, and you wouldn't even know it.

    But, I guess that goes against the post. My other thought is the social stigma associated with these things. I still get people telling me in an embarassed tone of voice that they can't remember my number any more without their cell phone handy. I see these things being huge in the area of 'intelligence augmentation' and 'external memories', if only people could accept that learning things rote is no longer something we actually have to do any more.

    1. Re:Why not wireless? by Kenja · · Score: 1

      It has SDIO. What more do you want? Stick a 802.11 or bluetooth card in there and your ready to go.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Why not wireless? by adamy · · Score: 1

      No, the computer goes under your collar, the tooth goes in your mouth.

      Blue Tooth indeed. Heh

      --
      Open Source Identity Management: FreeIPA.org
    3. Re:Why not wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it really interesting how similar this comment sounds to the old mainframe vs desktop debate that we used to have. It appears that for the most part the desktop has won that debate. PDAs appear to simpliy be a continuing shift due to the momentum of that first push of computing power away from a centralized system to a more de-centralized one.

      I'm sure this shifting of power is something that will be a continuing debate for the years to come.

      Something to think about: Don't companies make MORE money off of a de-centralized system where all the computing power is at the nodes? There are a LOT more leaf nodes then there are trunks...

    4. Re:Why not wireless? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Stick a 802.11 or bluetooth card in there and your ready to go.

      What's a ready to go, and why would he need to put a bluetooth card in it?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    5. Re:Why not wireless? by wicked_little_critta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...if only people could accept that learning things rote is no longer something we actually have to do any more....

      ...except for your password...

    6. Re:Why not wireless? by dirt_puppy · · Score: 1

      I think thats part of a two-pronged approach to the same end: the net grows closer (meaning: high bandwidth connection density, and covered areas grow) and the tools become more portable and get longer (radio) range.
      At some point in the future, the entire range will be spanned, so that neither (portable) computing power nor (portable) viewing capability are far away from the internet. That will be the time when our rollable displays and keyboards pc have both with radio interfaces to the internet (where avilable) and to each other. And to the mass storage units.

    7. Re:Why not wireless? by Kenja · · Score: 1
      From the parent: "Instead, why not make these machines effectively a "dumb terminal" and hook it in the Internet through a wireless connection, where it would interact with web services?"

      You put the bluetooth card in, configure it to connect to your GSM/BT phone and your on the net.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    8. Re:Why not wireless? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      You put the bluetooth card in, configure it to connect to your GSM/BT phone and your on the net.

      What's an "on the net"? I can see how you'd connect the collar computer to your phone via bluetooth, but what's this other thing, the "on the net"? And how do you use it?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    9. Re:Why not wireless? by chihowa · · Score: 1
      Kenja, I suspect that you may not get that he is poking fun of your use of 'your' in place of 'you're' which is the conjunction for 'you are'.

      corbettw: To my own dismay, I've found that when posting to Slastdot (and only then) I find myself making these stupid mistakes, too. I think that it's contagious. (Usually Preview compes to the rescue.)

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    10. Re:Why not wireless? by chihowa · · Score: 1
      ...poking fun of your use...

      See, it happened already.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    11. Re:Why not wireless? by dyte · · Score: 1

      except for your password

      What about sticky notes?
      The day's of learning things rote are over.
      Why would anyone want to be anywhere that their computer could not go?:)

    12. Re:Why not wireless? by iabervon · · Score: 1

      As it turns out, the power consumption necessary to use wireless is more than the power consumption necessary to do most computations locally. Sure, you could offload all your computations to a supercomputer, but then you'd need a heavy battery; it's lighter to just put the supercomputer and battery on you. This gets more and more true over time, because the energy needed to send a signal will always be the same, but processors get more efficient over time. The only reason to connect to the internet is to get data that you don't have locally.

      I think the social stigma is due to the fact that people sometimes don't have their memory augmentation handy. People's cell phones break, or the batteries run out, or they lose them, or they replace them, and suddenly they don't know anything anymore. If someone were to always have their cell phone handy, they wouldn't think to tell you that they need it to remember your number; in fact, they wouldn't even know.

    13. Re:Why not wireless? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      ...poking fun of your use...
      See, it happened already.


      No, that's the correct use of 'your'. Remember, pronoun possessives never use apostrophes (its, their(s), your(s)), contractions always do (it's => it is, they're => they are, you're => you are). Something which would've given Chaucer problems, but not us modern speakers (one hopes).

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    14. Re:Why not wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that you can be in constant contact with /.

    15. Re:Why not wireless? by kgarcia · · Score: 1

      Don't forget...

      Your Email password
      Your Banking password
      your home machine password
      your general password
      your junkmail password
      your credit card password
      your /. password
      your password-management software password (if you can't keep track of all of the above) ... etc

      -sigh- i wish e-business companies would actually standardize on the special characters allowed in their passwords... as it is, you have to come up with inventive alternatives to chars like [,-~3` or $, since half the "web applications" out there don't support them...

    16. Re:Why not wireless? by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the use of 'of', as 'poking fun of' should read 'poking fun at'. I also said conjunction instead of contraction. This is what I get for even mentioning grammar/spelling!

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  25. under the collar? by nizo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok great the computer fits under my collar, but does it have a jack to plug right into my brain? Or must I wear those uber-geeky display glasses with a one handed keyboard to use it, which would seem to defeat the purpose of yet another ultra small computer. It seems we need to work on the interface for wearables more than anything.

    1. Re:under the collar? by telbij · · Score: 1

      I would think you would want the jack installed professionally, not as a DIY kit that comes with the computer. Imagine that metal hole in the side of your head. What do you do when it starts to itch?

    2. Re:under the collar? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      The glasses don't have to look that geeky.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:under the collar? by Analogy+Man · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You hit it on the head. My objection to most of the modern gizmo's is the interface not the form factor. I hate the superfluous menues on my damn cell phone and I do not have a PDA. I guess I am decidedly the anti-uber-geek for admitting this, but I am not alone! The truly clever person (not just technically proficient and skilled) that comes up with an unobtrusive interface will rock the marketplace. Maybe a generation of kids that grew up sending messages over their cell phones and text pagers will leave me in the proverbial dust, but I can certainly hope for a revolution.

      On the other hand maybe while we are out and about away from our LAN we should talk with the person next to use instead of on the other end of a cell phone call, read a good book instead of surfing blogs and listen to the wind in the trees instead of the latest MP3 we downloaded.

      Now I guess I will crawl into my shack, work on my manifesto and prepare some "packages".

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    4. Re:under the collar? by pavon · · Score: 1

      It seems we need to work on the interface for wearables more than anything.

      I agree comrade. I will inform the Ministry of Technological Development immediately and put a halt to this unproductive enginering.

    5. Re:under the collar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A look at the actual company product pages indicates that most "heads-up" displays are actually intended to be mounted on glasses, so whether your glasses are geeky or not is your own call... except that little gadget attachment is definitely geeky no matter whether your glasses are.

    6. Re:under the collar? by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Collar sensors are very common in places where radiation is present, etc. A networked realtime remotely monitored sensor using a computer like this would be used. Or at least one that can record data with a timestamp vs. an idiot light.

      If its a normal computer that you can interface with, it would be neat to just talk to it like a Secret Service agent, but I don't think this guy has anywhere near the processing power for that.

      Anyway, I find it amusing that slashdoters (including myself) love technology so much, but as soon as there is something new we all scoff at it and ask "Why?".

    7. Re:under the collar? by karnal · · Score: 1

      Think calamine lotion and Electonic parts cleaner.

      Just beware. The first spray into the "jack" will leave you feeling a little disoriented.

      --
      Karnal
    8. Re:under the collar? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

      "with a one handed keyboard to use it"

      Okay, I see where you are going with your idea .....

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    9. Re:under the collar? by evilmrhenry · · Score: 1

      It seems we need to work on the interface for wearables more than anything.

      It is a simple problem, easily solved with duct tape, a monkey and some explosives.


      I can see the reason for the monkey, and everything can use duct tape, but I'm unsure on the reason for the explosives. Could you elaborate more?

    10. Re:under the collar? by nizo · · Score: 1
      I can see the reason for the monkey, and everything can use duct tape, but I'm unsure on the reason for the explosives. Could you elaborate more?

      Ok.... lets see if I can remember the conversation that gave me the idea for this sig. I was talking to my fiance' the other night, discussing how Albuquerque seems to be the bank robbery capital of the U.S. and then the perfect bank robbery scheme dawned on me: send in a trained monkey, with some explosives and a sign that says "fill the bag with money and I won't blow up" or something along those lines. Then presumably the monkey takes the money out to a waiting car. Maybe include a wirless radio to talk to the chimp and tellers. Ok so it probably isn't cheap to find and train a monkey for this, but hey you asked.

  26. Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?" by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

    No, but slashdot editors stretching for witty responses is.

    Sorry guys, why does everything have to be the Next big thing? Why not just hail it as a fantasitic step forward?

    Yo Grark

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re: Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?" by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      slashdot desperately wants to be taken seriously as journalism.

      thusly, they need serious sensationalism.

    2. Re: Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?" by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Is this even a fantastic step forward? The guy has merely wired up a handful of off the shelf components onto a small circuit board, and stuck linux on it. Granted, it may be more complex than a SIMMSTICK, but it is hardly a "fantastic step" anywhere. In fact, the only novel thing is the suggestion to place a wearable computer in your collar.

    3. Re: Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?" by Timmeh · · Score: 1

      If you'll notice that text is in italics, meaning it was not the addition of an editor, which would have been in plain text. HTH

    4. Re: Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?" by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

      Good point, thank you.

      Yo Grark

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    5. Re: Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?" by Timmeh · · Score: 1

      And rereading my post made me sound like an ass, sorry for that, I had just got out of class and was kinda pissed at my first physics test grade. Again, sorry :P

  27. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?"

    no

  28. Great! by gid13 · · Score: 1

    How many gigs is the hard drive? :D

    1. Re:Great! by hattig · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, if they use one of Toshiba's new 0.85" hard drives on it ... a gig or so.

      How fast does the PXA255 on this device run? I wonder how many pages/e-mails/etc a second it could serve ...

  29. Bugs need to be ironed out. by Traicovn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I still have some (pretty straight-forward) bugs to be ironed out but a few other friends are now diving into these.

    Best to iron these out without the device still in the shirt collar. Medium starch.

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
    1. Re:Bugs need to be ironed out. by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Also not a good idea to go diving while wearing one. Unless you've got it in some sort of watertight pouch.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  30. looks good ... but... by torpor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... i dunno that i'd be all 'collar' about it.

    i'd definitely wear one of these in my leather jacket, though.

    seems like it would be a good fit for 'seams', and i can think of a million uses for linux-enabled clothes, really ... especially if i can put an 802.11g-friendly antennae thread somewhere.

    combine it with todays 'bendy LCD' materials, and we could, finally, be rid of the package-gadget dilemna forever. (clothes become computing devices.)

    "hi, i'm home, its me, this is my pgp key, turn on the lights and wake up the studio ..."

    "constant-slashdot feed, on my collar lcd..."

    "location-based websites" - now, here is an idea whose time has come: an internet based entirely on -physical- proximity.

    who knows, maybe devices like this could save the music industry. if my clothes walked away with legit .mp3s' of the concert i just attended, i'd attend more concerts.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:looks good ... but... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      an internet based entirely on -physical- proximity.

      LOL. you're joking right? We've done this already. They're called billboards.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    2. Re:looks good ... but... by mhesseltine · · Score: 1
      (clothes become computing devices.)

      So now, when you get mugged, the mugger strips you naked, leaves you in an alley, and runs off wearing your clothes to signup for all sorts of pr0n sites, credit cards, etc. in your name.

      Thanks, but no thanks.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    3. Re:looks good ... but... by jbrocklin · · Score: 1

      I really like the idea of proximity browsing - being able to walk up to a resturant for example, see reviews, read the menu before going in and sitting down. Or going on a road trip, and going through a town and being notified of a place that you may have missed visiting. But, think of how annoying pop-up ads would become!

      The concert idea is a good one too - unless it's means a drasctically higher ticket price...

    4. Re:looks good ... but... by kris_lang · · Score: 1

      Don't know that I'd necessarily want it embedded within the seams or the clothing. The wash/dry or dryclean cycles may knock out some of that fancy button power. This may be politically incorrect on /. but even having your own RFID transponder/receiver in one of these would be ool. Instead of labeling the button or the wearer with the RFID tag, your carry-on / wear-along computer gathers the info from the RFID tags around you and then can respond based upon the environment sensed. On my short experience with bluetooth, I'd say that this concept couldn't probably draw too much more battery power than bluetooth.

    5. Re:looks good ... but... by torpor · · Score: 1

      duh, if anyone else puts on that jacket, it formats itself.

      its not -that- important, its just integrated.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    6. Re:looks good ... but... by sparkz · · Score: 1

      "hi, i'm home, its me, this is my pgp key, turn on the lights and wake up the studio ..."
      OMG!!! Hope nobody steals your jacket :-)

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
  31. This is cute...if it's for real. by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    I would actually be interested in this...that is, unless this is a hoax. If someone is prepared to market this, please let me know. An open-source chibi 'puter would be nice.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  32. cluster by millahtime · · Score: 1, Redundant

    So, with wireless... could a bunch of people standing in line be a beowolf cluster.

    1. Re:cluster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why this was marked redundant, hes the first person to mention a group of people. The others where 1 person with multiple gumstix.

      But oh well, they give moderation points to anyone. (-;

  33. size in imperial units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    20 x 80 mm = 0.004 x 0.016 rods

  34. How About a Watch? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Put this in a watch and I will buy one.

    I've been looking for a geeky watch. The IBM Linux watch doesn't look like it is ever going to come out.

    Add a tiny color touch screen, some buttons and a tiny speaker/mic.

    The SD slot has lots of possibilities (I mean other than "wrist pr0n").

    1. Re:How About a Watch? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      How about the MSN watch? I've been seeing billboards for the things all other town, and they look interesting.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:How About a Watch? by tgd · · Score: 1

      How are you going to see the porn with it all moving around all the time?

    3. Re:How About a Watch? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      $180+ for a horrible looking M$ thing with a simple paging-type receiver? No thanks.

      Bad SPOT, bad!

    4. Re:How About a Watch? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Well, since I have to use both hands, I see your point...

  35. Probably not by mark_space2001 · · Score: 1
    Well, um, really, why would it be the next big thing? Technology has had the ability to produce very small exlectronics some time now, do you see a huge demand for them?

    This device sounds about as big as an iPod, except that the iPod has a 4G. Now there's a cool device. Small, single function, useful, stylish and has the infrastructure support (iTunes) to make it a commercial success. (And the mini comes with a wrist strap so you can wear it while jogging. Hello, wearable.)

    If you as me, this device is a "gee-whiz" technology demo for it's maker. If you have a great idea what to do with the technology, go for it. But by itself it's not going to do much.

  36. YOU FAILED IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually it's SONET. An tech acronym, not a Shakespearean poetic delivery.

    Dumbass.

    1. Re:YOU FAILED IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're so cool. Can I have sex with you?

  37. Danger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about a next generation platform for enslavement collars! Just don't try to put WinCE on it or you may end up like this guy!

  38. A Linux Machine For MY? Collar by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    Very clever machine, but what an unusual choice of location for such an embedded device.

    What next, a computer for your ball-gag ? Or maybe running GIMP on your GIMP ???

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:A Linux Machine For MY? Collar by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it would seem more appropriate in the collar of a dress shirt?

      Imagine, a PDA in every shirt, and a Bluetooth-enabled closet to make sure your shirts are up-to-date. Add one of those new rollable displays to the sleeve, and away you go.

    2. Re:A Linux Machine For MY? Collar by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


      hehe, yeah, but the last thing my company needs is a reason to go back to the suit rule (even for programmers!)

      --
      "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  39. So It's a PDA by Abit667 · · Score: 0

    ...Without the screen and other bs..I seriously think I rather have a PDA, even though I hate them to begin with. How would you interact with something like that..you'll need a screen of some type and then some kind of input, and then in the end how is that better then a PDA. It's the same hardware as well.

    1. Re:So It's a PDA by ill_mango · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yeah, I agree at this point it's little more than a geekier-looking PDA, but it would be cool if he could somehow come up with a screen that wears like glasses and some sort of small, one-handed input device.

      I think people should start working on smaller, more convenient interfaces rather than smaller computers, because we have some pretty ridiculously small computers out already.

    2. Re:So It's a PDA by jaxdahl · · Score: 2, Informative

      one-handed input device
      aremac
      I've seen ones that look just like sunglasses, but can't find a pic now.

  40. In other news... by ChiefScientist · · Score: 1
    Geeks lend a hand in the manufacturing of "Intelligent Vibrators"

    Women everywhere state that it's about time geeks put their minds to good use.

    1. Re:In other news... by starm_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      "gumstix.org has a brief but titillating description"

      Main Entry: titillate
      Function: verb Inflected Form(s): -lated; -lating
      1 : to excite pleasurably : arouse by stimulation

      what the???

  41. Well yes actually think about it. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Interesting
    You keep your neck undented. Things in my pocket have to survive me bending over and such. The connectors on portable players always get damaged because of that. Same with the antenna's on old phones. Add to it your keys, loose change and handkerchief and you got a hostile enviroment.

    Belt? Even worse in many ways. In a working enviroment things tend to snag. And if you are crawling around after wires this is not nice.

    So yeah the collar would be an intresting spot. A safe place on the body. How often do you bump your hips into something and how often your throath?

    Of course the original reference was humorous intended but I just dislike it when people automatically snub an idea just because they refuse to think for a second about a new possibilty.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Well yes actually think about it. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      What about a shirt pocket? It'd fit in there...

    2. Re:Well yes actually think about it. by winse · · Score: 1

      yeah.... that could be the *new* pocket protector. A sure sign that u r a virgin

      --
      this sig is deprecated
    3. Re:Well yes actually think about it. by orasio · · Score: 1

      You keep your neck undented. Things in my pocket have to survive me bending over and such.

      Nobody wants to know that!
      Keep those nasty sexual habits to yourself!!
      Nobody wants to hear you here, this is a respectable place!

    4. Re:Well yes actually think about it. by pcraven · · Score: 1

      Things in my pocket have to survive me bending over and such.

      Um, maybe you shouldn't bend over so much.

    5. Re:Well yes actually think about it. by linuxcoder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Belt? Even worse in many ways.

      Nah, many geeks have plenty of "padding" around the belt area to protect the device.

    6. Re:Well yes actually think about it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Belt? Even worse in many ways. In a working enviroment things tend to snag. And if you are crawling around after wires this is not nice.

      I keep my groin protected from pain, so i think a belt would be best.

      When something snags at my groin, or it gets too cold or hot, or gets anywhere close to being at risk, i correct asap.

      Besides, i've always wanted a nice big texas-style buckle.

  42. what about sweat-ers? by queen+of+everything · · Score: 1

    What if you naturally sweat a lot? Would it short it out...or shock you? Not that a lot of us remember the last time we worked up a sweat (without watching pr0n)...but its possible, right?

    --
    "Wisdom is not a product of schooling but of the life-long attempt to acquire it." -Albert Einstein
  43. Now I know what Timothy really wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget a Linux collar. What about an embedded Linux alternative to the gerbil he's so fond of? Those claws are getting to him after awhile.

  44. Is this true????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If you look at the stats on slashdot something like 93% come there using windows.. another 5% on Mac and 2% on linux (roughly, don't quote me on that).. So the majority of the guys who are so "pro" linux are usually guys who have an idea about it and are still not using it, know just a little about it or have just started using it.
    Seldom ddo true linux guys post there because it is usually a waste of time."

    If so there is no excuse for you turds.

    1. Re:Is this true????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opera reports my browser as I.E.6.0 but is actually Opera 7.23 running on Slackware 9.1. So according to the stats I'm a Windows user (IE) while in fact I am a Linux user!

      - Lies - Damned Lies -

    2. Re:Is this true????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Centrino WIFI... Compaq laptop. Desktop site configuration, PHB, CEO's, SCO... want some more reasons why it's not on my desktop?

  45. What about heat? by GOD_ALMIGHTY · · Score: 1

    I think this thing should consume more power. At 1 watt, you're not going to get enough heat dissapation for it to double as a heat pad on the back of your neck.

    And let's face it, that's really what we want, a heat pad that does Seti@Home calculations while releaving our sore muscles. Props to the first person who writes the intelligence for our new heatpads to crawl across our backs and hooks up sensors that find knots to be worked out.

    It's the year 2004, where are my robotic masseuses?

    --
    Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
  46. Distributed Computing by forsetti · · Score: 1

    So -- can I run the SETI screensaver or, even better, distcc, and send my compile jobs to the others standing around at the packed subway station?

    --
    10b||~10b -- aah, what a question!
  47. the RIAA scenario by andih8u · · Score: 2, Funny

    "yes, we searched his entire apartment and couldn't find anything but a wireless router...but we know he's sharing mp3s somehow. Kept thumbing his collar....weird kid."

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
  48. What the heck by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    If people wear the overpriced $300 iPod to go jogging, I guess this device is just the same.

    Where's that firewire cable leash now.

  49. Better yet, up one's sleave ... by jrifkin · · Score: 1

    That's where all the cagey geeks will keep it.

  50. Cooling is crucial by rco3 · · Score: 1

    I realize that 200 mA is likely to be less than one watt, but that's still a significant amount of heat to emit for a device worn next to the skin.

    This thing is going to make a lot of people hot under the collar.

    [ducks]

    --

    Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  51. yeah it is cool and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but what sort of practical applications would it have?

  52. Grey Matter by pipingguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?

    Why not? For many, it'd be the only processing power above the neck.

    1. Re:Grey Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wear your collar above your neck?

  53. Collartop? by thisissilly · · Score: 1

    But that means I'd have to give up all my T-shirts!

  54. Super-office-guy!!! by JawFunk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, if I link this to a voice recognition program for numbers and math terms, add a display in your sleeve or like a HUD inside your glasses, and I could have a voice activated calculator, and totally impress chicks and others when doing complex equations right infront of them: "Hey M, what's the total liability for the period 1972 through 1989 if we owed $6,998,973.20 calculated at a compounded interest of 6%?" "It's THREE! Wait, oh shit, DragonSpeak failed."

    --
    [Please sign here]
  55. How do they figure this stuff out? by aztektum · · Score: 1

    Under a collar? Who sat and figured that one out? What other places did they stuff it before they decided the collar was the best?

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
    1. Re:How do they figure this stuff out? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      What other places did they stuff it before they decided the collar was the best?

      Umm, these are linux zealots. It wouldnt fit up their asses next to the iPod and Zaurus.

      Realize also that these are knobs who own nothing but collared shirts. On the beach in a collared T shirt. Socks with sandals. They're that cool.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  56. Watchdogs by chopkins1 · · Score: 1

    Well, the article does talk about "real-time clock, watchdog and interval timers" so maybe it's that watchdog that needs the collar?

  57. Good Luck by sparklingfruit · · Score: 1

    Good luck trying to get through airport security...

  58. Albatross around your neck by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    I've always thought of computers and cell phones being an "Albatross" around my neck, sort of speak. But soon, it looks like it might *be* one for real. Damn, sometimes I just want to get away from technology for a moment. Maybe I'm being anti-geek in saying this. But damn, I'm only Human and need my natural space too from time to time.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  59. Obvious rebuttal by cskaplan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?

    No, it isn't.

    1. Re:Obvious rebuttal by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      I thought that comment of the poster's was facetious.

      I also thought they were talking about dog collars...

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  60. titillating by starm_ · · Score: 1

    "gumstix.org has a brief but titillating description"

    Main Entry: titillate
    Function: verb Inflected Form(s): -lated; -lating
    1 : to excite pleasurably : arouse by stimulation

    Ah yes... The kind of story that makes geeks titillate.

  61. Comes with an extension cord and a boss-locator. by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    That way they can squeeze a few more minutes of production out of you on the can, when you are, uhhh, producing.

    Great Idea. Now interface it to my eye glasses so I can instantly recall names, age, birthday, kids, interests for anyone I meet. :)

  62. Collar computing... a good reason to have a dog! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow.. now I can put this on my dog... build a battery with static charger... Pooch PC!

    Now my guide dog can be my guide to the Internet!

    Lol...

  63. What kind of processor does this use? by deviantonline · · Score: 0
    I was wondering what sort of processor does this device use? What sort of computing power does it then produce? Can programs be compiled with it? How long can it last with whatever kind of batteries it needs?

    I guess you could say Im interested and think this thing is cool!

    1. Re:What kind of processor does this use? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      According to the article, it uses an Intel PXA255. The creator has plans to open source the thing, so if you are truely interested, read the article and contact him. (His name is Gordon.)

  64. Linux + Personal cooling system by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

    http://www.sharperimage.com/us/en/catalog/productv iew.jhtml?sku=SI488CB2

    Maybe someone could put the linux machine with the Personal Cooling System.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  65. Bondage by nwf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, depending on your collar, if you run Windows on it, you can be in double bondage!

    --
    I don't know, but it works for me.
    1. Re:Bondage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you run SCO, would that imply slavery? I'm sure they'd somehow own the shirt, then ultimately you.

  66. Funny? by Holdstrong · · Score: 1

    Is there a way to filter out the "Funny" posts that get mod'ed up?

    They seem to overwhelm the posts that have actual content in them... oh and I've got news for ya. They are rarely funny.

    Just like I dont want to read the joke emails that get forwarded to me, I dont want to read 500 little clever comments about every subject on /.

    Please tell me there is a way to filter out the comedy hour so I can get to the substance of the discussion.

    1. Re:Funny? by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is. Go to your Preferences page, select the Comments tab, then find the section labelled "Reason Modifier" and use the drop-down to set Funny modded posts to -6. Done.

      That's how I ignore Trolls and ACs.

    2. Re:Funny? by elitebrad · · Score: 1

      ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US

      it had to be said

      hi

      damn this lameness filter to hell

    3. Re:Funny? by Holdstrong · · Score: 1

      You are my hero! Thank you so much.

    4. Re:Funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's also how I nuke foes. If I show up as a freak to you, that means you've been k-lined and will sit below my threshold forever more, regardless of whether or not you decided to turn your life around and stop being such an ass. Not you, "Baron Yam", just a generic "you".

  67. Was I the only one who thought by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

    "Great my Dog can use Linux now, W00t!" when they saw this article? Tho I wonder what some good canine applications of Linux would be (at risk of sounding off topic):

    1) Smart sensors that automatically determine when your dog is not following his housebreaking and shock him accordingly
    2) If Dog barks, it evaluates validity of threat (using spy camera embedded in collar) and alerts you if it's a problem...
    3) Any others?

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:Was I the only one who thought by why+cant+i+get+the+n · · Score: 1

      again.. with the off-topic... but... you could have sensors that monitor his hunger and thirst that alert you accordingly

  68. Dress Code by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    Dude, you would not like me running your office - It might cause a slight lowering of morale, but in my experience a 'suit rule' provides a formal working environment that results in a quality increase worth the morale loss. Of course, I'm also old school enough that I think the boss should be a "Mr." or "Ms." and not by their first name.

    Besides, my way you get a PDA built into your shirt... duh. :)

    1. Re:Dress Code by Dave21212 · · Score: 2, Informative


      Do you also believe in pensions, on the job training, company cars, company parking spaces, martini lunches, and lower paid CEOs vs employees as well ? (using the 1980's 40:1 ration instead of the 1999 500:1 ratio). Do the mailroom employees wear suits ?

      Not to go totally OT, but it's just so rare to find someone who believes that programmers (who don't meet clients) wearing a suit can increase "production" Actually, working from home increases production more... ever try that ?

      Oh, and I'll take two of those PDA shirts since I tend to break those things !!! - Thanks.

      --
      "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
    2. Re:Dress Code by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Actually, I DO believe in pensions (reasonable ones that don't translate into upper execs getting 100% after 10 years), and apprenticeships. Company cars should be for those people who drive as part of their job - not bonuses for execs. The suit rule translates into casual dress for mailroom staff and their equivalents - ie nice shirt and slacks. Obviously, the guys in maintence or in a warehouse, etc are going to need clothing suitable for their environment, and a suit or even dress casual is inappropriate for them.

      People who are productive when telecommuting are GOLD - they don't take up office space and related resources. They're also rare, which is why I would never base a company on a telecommuting workforce, and why most telecommuniting jobs are those that can be closely monitored for performance, like call centers.

      Now, about those collar PDAs...

  69. Overclockers? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Ok great the computer fits under my collar, but does it have a jack to plug right into my brain? Or must I wear those uber-geeky display glasses with a one handed keyboard to use it, which would seem to defeat the purpose of yet another ultra small computer. It seems we need to work on the interface for wearables more than anything.

    Let's see if we can go:

    voice activated/voice recognition "Computer bring up io.c"

    Glasses display

    GPSr

    WiFi

    Audio (ear pods)

    Hmm, you'd never have to go home. And more time away from your tech-nest and you might actually have a chance to date! Just don't tell her you're networking...

    Let's take this to the logical extension: overclocking. Will this result in getting 'hot under the collar?'

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Overclockers? by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Just don't tell her you're networking...

      No, telling her you're networking is fine... she'll think you're an MBA or something, not knowing any better.
      Just don't tell her you're networking in more ways than one...

  70. Re:Watch how the liberals run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The grandparent is clearly a brit. Why would he watch fox news? That would also be "blairinite" instead of "bushiate".

  71. I don't know about you... by why+cant+i+get+the+n · · Score: 1

    but I'm going to get rid of all my t-shirts now and replace them with collared ones.

  72. Wow, all this needs is ... by Asprin · · Score: 1


    Wow, all this needs is no battery. Seriously. Maybe a solar panel, or one of those biomechanical generators that use spare motion to generate power like a self-winding watch. Or, for the ultimate geek, rig up a stirling engine that can run off your body heat.

    Way cool, man. Way cool.


    P.S. Where do you put the monitor and keyboard? Lemme guess - bluetooth to the display on your wristwatch? The possibilities are endless!

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  73. Can you just. . . by uncitizen · · Score: 1

    imagine what a beowulf cluster of those babies could do? come on, admit it...someone had to say it.

  74. Novell? by seanmeister · · Score: 1

    So, now that Novell has embraced Linux, can we expect Novell Neckware?

  75. Yay... it's called a *PDA* by tsaimelv · · Score: 1
    Umm...

    The PXA255 is Intel's integrated processor found in a huge number of current PDAs. Take *any* PDA based on this, and then take away the battery and LCD, port linux to it, and you have what this guy built. And for those who want to build their own, Intel's reference schematics for the PXA255 probably include all the basic subcircuits to design your own. Next big thing? Uhh, can we have some new news?

    There are countless numbers of tiny, single-PCB computers that run linux. Even though this is cool in some ways, the only "innovation" here is the notion that it can fit under your collar.

  76. JUST IMAGINE by cpfeifer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a Beowulf cluster of th+++NO CARRIER

    --
    it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
    1. Re:JUST IMAGINE by bhima · · Score: 1
      How in the hell is this insightful?

      It stopped being funny before 100BT was the norm!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  77. wrong OS by sklib · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly this thing shouldn't run linux, but instead some form of MacOS, just because there's no way I can reliably click one of two buttons with my adam's apple, but I could probably manage it with just the one.

    --
    -S
  78. Lassie by reuben04 · · Score: 1

    All right! Lassie gets a PC... Now my dog and I have internet access, voice activated so she can call for help!

  79. Collar? by jafac · · Score: 1

    Who came up with that idea? Some S&M freakazoid?

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  80. how much it will cost? by k.ellsworth · · Score: 1

    at least must be like $799, $100 for the gadget, and 699 for the SCO IP licence. sorry i couldn't help it... i had to joke about it.

    --
    Putting a windows cd backwards, plays evil messages, but it gets worse, putting it right, installs windows.
  81. I rebut your rebuttal by pavon · · Score: 1

    > > Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?
    > No, it isn't.
    Yes, it is.

    ha beat that one!

  82. I'm still waiting for nostril-embedded computers by LazloToth · · Score: 3, Funny


    I hope the keyboard plug is PS/2 - - not USB! Ouch!

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  83. What self-respecting Linux geek... by gosand · · Score: 2, Funny

    What self-respecting Linux geek wears a shirt with a collar?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  84. 200mA sounds wrong by pslam · · Score: 1
    I realize that 200 mA is likely to be less than one watt, but that's still a significant amount of heat to emit for a device worn next to the skin.

    I'm a little surprised by that figure, but it's probably either because it doesn't use low power flash and SDRAM parts, or simply because it's not configured correctly. For example, there's a well hidden bit in the SDRAM controller on a PXA255 which enables a low power mode (it goes unclocked except for refresh when idle), which shaves off a ton of power.

    I would expect something more like 10-50mA at 5v with a PXA255, flash and SDRAM.

    1. Re:200mA sounds wrong by karnal · · Score: 1

      But let's say they're looking at 1v just for kicks.

      10-50mA would suddenly turn into 50-250mA. So, "x"mA is kind of a misleading term.

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:200mA sounds wrong by pslam · · Score: 1
      But let's say they're looking at 1v just for kicks.
      10-50mA would suddenly turn into 50-250mA. So, "x"mA is kind of a misleading ter

      No, I meant 10-50mA at 5v. The PXA255 is absolutely shockingly efficient. It really is better than pretty much any other low-power-high-perfomance CPU. I know this from experience - as in trying it on an actual board and sticking it on an accurate meter :)

      The reason he's got 200mA is really most likely because of the combination of incorrect setups (no low power SDRAM mode) and bad components selection. 200mA is way, way off anything I've ever seen on any platform comparable to the gumstix one.

  85. The secret of Dilbert's necktie. by AJWM · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm, combine that computer with this flexible display technology (running a flashy screensaver) and put anyone else's loud tie to shame.

    Or just use the tie as your monitor, although it'd have to curl up so you could read it more easily. Now what nerd do we know that wears a curling up necktie...

    --
    -- Alastair
    1. Re:The secret of Dilbert's necktie. by Ateryx · · Score: 1
      Too bad the ties only good for about a month: (From the article)
      "The life of our organic electronics displays has been already prolonged from ?hours to months,?

      Ironically enough, It would last the same amount of time as normal ties for most slashdotters last without mustard/ketchup stains.

      --
      "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
    2. Re:The secret of Dilbert's necktie. by louzerr · · Score: 1

      Now this is the perfect use!

      Wait 'til everyone in the office sees SETI@home running on my tie! (I suppose it'd be pretty slow)

      --
      "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -- "Step Right Up", Tom Waits
  86. It's been done by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    There was a pretty cheesy movie called "Deadlock" with Rutger Hauer about ten years ago...

    the IMDB page is here

    cheesy old sci-fi movies rule...

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:It's been done by dossen · · Score: 1

      I'm not usually one to point out other peoples mistakes, but this is just ridiculous - The movie is called 'Wedlock', and it is right there at the top of the IMDb page.

    2. Re:It's been done by City+Jim+3000 · · Score: 0

      I'm not either... but check the picture - and: Also Known As: Deadlock (1991) (TV)

  87. Combined with the "secure mini-Apache" by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Wow! You could use this to run your own webserver. Then all you'd need would be a portable WiFi or Bluetooth setup - you could let the ladies know "Hey! I'm a Slashdot kind of guy!" at a safe distance... for them.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  88. home detention by sir_cello · · Score: 1


    This will be perfect for home detention and other forms of restraint systems. Linux as a tool to enforce sentences!

  89. ok, probably not for wearing the thing by Count+of+Montecristo · · Score: 1
    but how about, like the guy sugests, as a robotics controler? the thing is small enough to embed into an LCD display and presto! a thin client with enough processing power for an X display..

    Or how about PDAs or even telemetry applications..

    Maybe wearable computing is a little far fetched but i can see the advantages of having such a small device embedded on all sorts of appliances and stuff

    --
    *shower*
  90. Surprised at such little insight by Geccie · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm surprised that this advancement is reduced to a joke. I've been waiting for a small form factor os capable platform for some time. The closest I've seen are the 5 1/4 SBCs. My goal is to use these devices for autonomous control of radio controlled aircraft. Personal UAV :) Given the lower power requirements and very low weight, this platform can be combined with an OOPIC sensor interface and gimbal sensors + GPS to do the job. Now if I can get it for less than $100. Combine 20 and have your own battle of Britian :)

    1. Re:Surprised at such little insight by bhima · · Score: 1

      you forget the average slashdoter is busy recreating las vegas inside his PC case!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:Surprised at such little insight by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      You are right.
      The comentary here is drool.

      Before I start in - I developed a flight controller which can coordinate many planes safely using ant colony alg which is particularly suited to small computers / small planes - if you ever build 20 UAV.

      But you have identified the essential use - which is a hackable light computer.

      I would guess there are a good many computing application waiting for a solar powered device capable of communication which can be programmed - run common utilities and is cheap. Some pda come close but they carry a lot of interface baggage (display keyboard).

      The wireless (insert your favorite USB device here) is one class.

  91. Just think! by digrieze · · Score: 1

    Wow, you could hook this thing up to a cell phone by bluetooth and have a moble dial-up server.

    Gives new meaning to "ring around the collar" doesn't it!

    --
    It doesn't matter what you wrap your emotions around, Reality is a brick wall specifically designed to scramble eggs
  92. SM-Linux by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Nice catchy title for a new linux distro.

    "dont let your master catch you not properly wired"

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  93. I want a lip-top computor by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    No, really. Wouldnt that be cool?

    Have the display projected holographically in front of you, with speech recognition. Perfect!

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
    1. Re:I want a lip-top computor by jdray · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the speech recognition program would have to be modded to take into account the thing attached to your lip. Of course, this woman could probably fit a beowulf cluster of them in place of what she's got and still have room.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    2. Re:I want a lip-top computor by tigersha · · Score: 1

      Jesus, that woman should be able to render all the scenes in Titanic with her Beowulf cluster of liptop computers in 5 seconds!

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  94. I don't think the throat is the best spot for it. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know about you, but my company's payroll department is staffed exclusively by ninjas. I can't even begin to count the number of times I've gone to get my paycheck and gotten a throat punch.

    They broke my pta (personal throat assistant) right when I got there, and I had to buy something else.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  95. Collar? Ummm... by SlapAyoda · · Score: 1

    Let's see, the last time I wore a collar? Hrm. That's a tough one. I think it was the wedding for that distant relative. So unless I need to IRC during the vows, this isn't very useful for me.

    Bring on the pocket-protector-top-computer!

    --
    # wrote sig.txt, 23 lines, 31337 chars
  96. 180nm process by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to the intel site, these CPUs are fabricated using a 180nm process.. This can only get more interesting once they start migrating to 130nm or 90nm, reducing power needs even further..

    What's the heat dissipation on something like this? Can it be safely encased in a waterproof housing without worrying about ventilation (or by using the housing as a radiator)?

    Verry kewl....

  97. Great! by iLL_L0gic · · Score: 1

    Now I have something to use to build my Linux-Powered Toaster I've always wanted! Me and a classmate got into an argument about Linux and he finally yelled out, "yeah, but can it make toast?" So there you have it folks, get to work on your prototypes. ;)

  98. error: interface not compatible with common sense by kris_lang · · Score: 1

    I wholeheartedly agree. If it's not a problem with the GUI interface (too many gewgaws, unlabeled buttons), it's a problem with menu heirarchies (menu choices in pull down menus with a list length of one, forced step pathways such as having to push the okay button a few times, or of course voice-mail jail menu options), or these days even with the hardware itself. Some of the newer cell phones use admittedly non-standard and amazingly non-utile key-pad layouts or even integrate multiple numbers onto a single rocker switch.
    But it's like getting used to the problems of Word, Excel, or Explorer: so many people get used to the klunky interfaces that they think it HAS to be that way.
    And I definitely agree with your suggestions about talking to people and reading books. And a good walk in the park or next to the cliffs in La Jolla is a great way to recharge the brain cells. Ocean sounds are pleasing too.

  99. "Dumb" terminals are NOT the total solution by tweakt · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It has always struck me that putting more and more power close to people is the wrong way to go. Instead, why not make these machines effectively a "dumb terminal" and hook it in the Internet through a wireless connection, where it would interact with web services? Then, you can have a supercomputer on your side, and you wouldn't even know it.

    You're exactly right, that is the way things are headed. But stop to think about the local computing power that may be required. Things like sophisticated video compression algorithms, speech recognition, and in the future perhaps an intelligent agent which sifts through data and presents useful items (think advanced version of dashboard). All of these things will need power close to the cpu. After that, Sun had it right, "The Network is the Computer". Especially for storage of data, etc. But there will always be a baseline requirement for local computing power.

    Also, another idea to consider. By offloading processing power... ie, the "dumb terminal" approach, you take away the power to customize your experience. You effectively end up with an advertising receiver. You'll be powerless to access the types of information that you're interested in, and the device becomes more like a television, only capable of doing what it's preprogrammed to. Most people will not go to the effort to set up their own web services to connect to.

    Distributed processing power is the future. But with lots of power spread out over millions of portable devices all interconnected, it becomes more of a social appliance that a number crunching system.

    (I drift off topic...)

    Personally what I'm most interested in are assistive agents. I think in the future you may be considered handicapped to NOT have one of these things someone on your person allowing you to tap into the global network, maybe even subconciously. Think instant google searches based on something you're thinking about, augmenting your memory automatically. Some really cool stuff, just hope the economy keeps together so I see it happen in my lifetime.

    1. Re:"Dumb" terminals are NOT the total solution by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      Personally what I'm most interested in are assistive agents. I think in the future you may be considered handicapped to NOT have one of these things someone on your person allowing you to tap into the global network, maybe even subconciously. Think instant google searches based on something you're thinking about, augmenting your memory automatically. Some really cool stuff, just hope the economy keeps together so I see it happen in my lifetime.

      We already have these. They're called PDA's. The difference between what you're referring to and the current technology is your reference to the cybernetic integration of the UI to provide a direct link between brain and information as opposed to the current method of visual interpretation we must do with our eyes as the primary UI.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    2. Re:"Dumb" terminals are NOT the total solution by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1
      By offloading processing power... ie, the "dumb terminal" approach, you take away the power to customize your experience.

      No, you don't. With a supercomputer on the other side, all you need is a display/interface device. Let the supercomputer decide what to send and how to display it. The dumb terminal only has to do the human interface part (draw pixels, get inputs, etc.).

    3. Re:"Dumb" terminals are NOT the total solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By offloading processing power... ie, the "dumb terminal" approach, you take away the power to customize your experience.

      Let the supercomputer decide what to send and how to display it.

      The point is that if you don't control the supercomputer, then you have no control over what you see if someone else wants to make you see something you don't want to see.

    4. Re:"Dumb" terminals are NOT the total solution by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      The point is that if you don't control the supercomputer, then you have no control over what you see if someone else wants to make you see something you don't want to see.

      And his point is that there's no reason why you cannot also control the supercomputer. It is, after all, SITTING ON YOUR DESK. ORWELL DOES NOT APPLY HERE.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    5. Re:"Dumb" terminals are NOT the total solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent's context implied that the hypothetical was, in fact, not something you'd have control over. Whether because you didn't have physical control over the box (i.e. utility computing) or because most people would just be too goddamn lazy (which is the impression I got from "most people won't want to set up their own remote services to connect to").

      The point is, most people won't be connecting to a machine on their desk. They'll be connecting to CNNremote, or whatever. And they'll choke down whatever CNN wants to send along with the 'news' of the day.

    6. Re:"Dumb" terminals are NOT the total solution by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Personally what I'm most interested in are assistive agents. [...] maybe even subconciously. Think instant google searches based on something you're thinking about, augmenting your memory automatically.

      I don't think this is such a good idea.

      Even if you don't buy into the urban legend that men think about sex every seven seconds, you're still going to be generating a lot of Google queries about the same thing... over and over...

      Or what if you're walking through the mall, and some teenybopper turns up Britney Spears, and you suddenly can't get "Oops, I Did It Again" out of your head because your implanted agent keeps pulling up the lyrics?

      And if we're talking wi-fi links to remote systems, then you've got the ability to tap into another person's thoughts. I, for one, do not want the guy giving a presentation on the latest corporate buzzword to know that I'm mentally surfing the competitors' job postings.

      And inadvertent cross-associations could be hazardous to your career.

      Boss: Go online and find the price of widgets.
      Thought 1: Online=Slashdot
      Thought 2: Slashdot=troll
      Thought 3: troll=goat
      Thought 4: goat=!!!!
      Boss: What the hell... you're fired!

      No thanks, I'll do my surfing the old fashioned way, if you don't mind!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    7. Re:"Dumb" terminals are NOT the total solution by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Right. But your dumb-terminal approach isn't what took away the ability to control your input. It's that people willingly give that control away. Dumb terminals have nothing to do with it.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  100. Step #2! Earth Final Conflict GlobalComms by strredwolf · · Score: 2, Funny

    OMG that's smaller than my Nokia 3590 "ATT GoPhone" by a factor of six! With the QVGA Fexible display, all we need now is power, display control, WiFi, and battery!!!

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  101. token ring by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    how long until token ring around the collar is implemented?

    sorry, awful joke. i'll save you a mod point and not post with karma bonus.

  102. Battle Royale anyone? by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the collars in Battle Royale Were running linux "Onee-san: OK, about the collars you're wearing They're 100/% waterproof and shockproof and permanent! lt monitors your pulse,|informing us of your location|and movementsSo if you linger in|a danger zone, or cause trouble,|we can identify you, and transmit radio waves that trigger an alarm and boom! lt explodes! lf you try to rip it off,|it explodes too, so promise not to try that, OK?"

  103. 2 words... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

    why this won't catch on:

    Running Man

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  104. Google cache by DerOle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seems like they either prepared their site for the /. effect or they initially were out to sell this stuff but reconsidered. Take a look at the google cache here and here where you can find out more about prices and specifications.

  105. Other places for wearable Linux computers by Mignon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Collars, you say? Wait 'til they have Linux-powered codpieces. Just be specific when you ask someone about his uptime.

  106. If your name starts with a Z by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    then you could have dual processing.

  107. cellphone tech? by fabio · · Score: 0

    couldnt this be used in cellphones, if i could get my hands on just the basic tools and components needed for a cellphone, i definetely would be trying to make a linux cellphone,

    by the way, i bought the n-gage, du you hate me now?

    --
    *resistance is futile, or fuzzy, i dunno*
  108. Rackmount...Then blades... by SIGPrez · · Score: 1

    What will they call it with this form factor?

    Strips?
    Slices?
    Chips?

    1. Re:Rackmount...Then blades... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      From the URL, I'll say Gumstix.

    2. Re:Rackmount...Then blades... by SIGPrez · · Score: 1

      I like it!

  109. Woo! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    With Linux-power in a collar, we don't just count cards, we perform advanced statistical analysis live and calculate mass probability facotrs based on trends on tables across the city!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  110. Kinky!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now my Mistress can have ultimate control over this slave through the Linux PC in my slave collar :)

  111. Dude, by 2names · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    It's "le-tarded"

    I bet your one of those peeple who pronownce "nu-cu-ler" wrong, to.

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  112. I can finally access the datasphere..... anywhere by fadethepolice · · Score: 2, Funny

    Combine this device (with a few upgrades) with Wearable displays + This Jacket (maybe an upgrade or two + a computer that speaks sign language + Pervasive wireless broadband and I am starting to get to my "comfort level" for internet access. No longer will I have to wait during my whole commute of 5 minutes to check for the next Slashdot story. No more shaking internet withdrawl on the bus!!

  113. Next Big Thing? by zapp · · Score: 1

    I'd say it's the next small thing!

    --
    no comment
  114. Collar? Yeah, but what about... by tommck · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can I strap this thing to my taint to measure humidity? It gets pretty swampy down there on hot days...

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  115. But what about... by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...a CD drive?

  116. Comming next by panxerox · · Score: 1

    the linux plon.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  117. Your mobile phone by Milkyman · · Score: 1

    It would be awesome to be able to use your bluetooth enabled phone as a display device for something like this. Mobileburn.com saw an under the collar bluetooth headset that I could see as a nice form factor for a computing device. Check out the pictures here

  118. Lady and the Tramp comment by farrellj · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the leash and collar set does for excitement?
    -- Tramp, Lady and the Tramp

    (Via the fortune command...credit where credit is due{grin})

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  119. National Security, TSA by wolf- · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If a Woman can be kept off a plane for a heated jacket with wires protruding, how are geeks going to explain to airport security why their shirts are beeping?

    --
    ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
  120. for my dog by MikeyO · · Score: 1

    hehe. When I first say this, I thought, oh man, does this mean they are making wearables for my dog now?

  121. .. Next generation of Porn by thedarkstorm · · Score: 2, Funny

    THis little guy is going to revolutionize the voyeur porn industry..
    - Just think of the shoe-cam
    - .....more and more and more

    --
    ... hey ... I had a .sig, bu then MicroSo$$ embraced it...
  122. Linux And Collars by mirio · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is collar-top computing the Next Big Thing?

    Hmm...given that this device is based on Linux and us Linux folks hate to wear collars, I give them poor odds of finding a market! :-)

    1. Re:Linux And Collars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to be one of the few that *likes*
      collars (buttoned at that :) Now my system
      administrator will be reaching under my collar
      to do "repairs" =)

  123. It is time for the Digital Pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Cant Wait for my Digital Pants to crash !

  124. Question is... by PatrickThomson · · Score: 0, Troll

    Does it run Windows?

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    1. Re:Question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me sir moderators... But why does the humorous and meaningless "Does it run linux?" get funny,5 and the equally humorous and meaningless "Does it run windows?" get modded down as a troll? Maybe I should have asked "Does it run SunOS" or "does it run OS/2"

  125. Re:I don't think the throat is the best spot for i by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

    You could try a pdb, personal digital brooch. Assuming nobody gives you any accusatory chest pokes.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  126. Not exactly something you would wear... by geomon · · Score: 1

    ...if your 'business' partners had any suspicion that you had offered information to the authorities.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  127. Re:I rebut your rebuttal - Pythonesque by 35ft_twinkie · · Score: 1

    These rebuttals are fine just so long as you don't mistake them for an argument.

    It should be obvious; this isn't an argument!

  128. Quick Poll: Would you buy one? by swframe · · Score: 1

    a) As it is now b) if it came with (select one or more) b1) a screen b2) a hard disk b3) senors and moter controllers c) not at all How much would you pay?

  129. SPAM? by freakmn · · Score: 1

    So with the wireless communication on this thing, how long before people getting these start getting spammed as they walk by places. If you are walking through a mall, people would all be sending you information on their lastest sales. This could have the positive effect of more competition between stores, and the prices going down, but wouldn't it be annoying?

    On the other hand, it could be used by some of the more desperate geeks to spam their phone number/e-mail address to others. Then again, the reciever would need to have one also, so the chances of finding a female would be slim...

    --
    warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  130. CyberPunk by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    This always confused me about the cyber punk books. Hardware is advancing so fast, why on earth would you get an implant when the next major upgade doesn't just cost you money, but also incurs a major surgery. Even assume it's just a "standard" port like PS/2 or something, those are being replaced by USB. I've got this snazy ethernet port for the back of my skull, but it's only 10mbit. What's a cyborg to do?

  131. Collar Computing by number6.3 · · Score: 1

    I see this as a return to Master/Slave computing.

    "I'll never use a peer-to-peer network again ... Master!"

    Yes, our compu-collars come in leather AND lace!

  132. Re:I'm still waiting for nostril-embedded computer by Lifthrasir · · Score: 1

    how about for expansion - hope for firewire instead of, say, SCSI :P

    --
    No beer, no TV make Lifthrasir something something
  133. Kinetic Power??? by stang7423 · · Score: 1

    Food for thought, but I wonder how much power those kinetic watches that you see out now can produce. If the mecanism can be beefed produce the necessary 200mA and 3.6-5V then you have essentially (besides for hardware fatigue) designed a computer/PDA that will never have to be recharged.

  134. kinda like the TARDIS by cribb · · Score: 1

    small enough to fit into my collar, but way too big for my wallet

    --
    Hostes alienigieni me abduxerunt. Qui annus est?
  135. Computer, Check, Contact Lense display?? by OgreFade · · Score: 1

    Forget the glasses, get some contact lenses that overlay the information on top of everyday objects, flat peices of wall, side walk that sort of thing. Then use the Eye Toy as an example, and you can use your hands to interact with the 'air', perhaps even your eye lids/eyes as interface option. Then we would have computers that could be carried personally without it being that cumbersome. Heck with enough computing power, and some contact lense displays you could get infrared night vision, thermal vision, magnification, highlighting of objects you choose think google toolbar here(find fruitloops..scannning, scanning, and found, bright shiney glowing box of fruitloops!). All overlaid on come contacts via your 'collar' computer. Sounds good. :)

  136. You're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try searching Google Groups for "No Carrier", this joke goes back to 1981!

  137. Perhaps if we... by alchemist0405 · · Score: 1

    ...add more memory to it & interface it with I/O video glasses, I could program in (take snapshots) of my buisness contacts and associate it with useful information. The glasses run a video feed to the little pc, pc recognizes the face, outputs information to the (tinted) glasses.

    Auto-update via. WiFi basend on new "inteligence"... ?

    I would say this is a rediculous idea... but then again, I wasn't expecting people to be wearing computers inside their shirt collars.

    --
    Cameron King
  138. Re:I'm still waiting for nostril-embedded computer by LazloToth · · Score: 1


    Heh heh - - no kidding. We won't even go into Centronics . . . .

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  139. Better use of form factor by identity0 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that it was the size of the guy's middle finger?

    Imagine flipping off people with your linux box!! :D

    "Suck Slackware, bitch!!"

  140. Neo makes sense by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 1

    Now I finally understand Neo's clerical collar - he didn't want his PC flapping about.

    --
    Think global, act loco
  141. Heh by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    I'm not usually one to point out other peoples mistakes

    Perhaps you should have read the whole IMDB page first (It's ok... I don't take it personally)

    As another poster already pointed out, if you read a bit more about that movie (or look at the packaging for the VHS tape), you'll see it was also called "Deadlock."

    I love you, man.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Heh by dossen · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that, totally forgot to check for aliases, since I _knew_ that I was right - stupid thing to do when you are wrong.

  142. The collar will live forever..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now along with a tie (or brooch), I can have
    a powerful computer. I like wearing large collars
    buttoned at the neck, so I'll be able to fit
    a beowulf cluster of these with my normal clothes :)

  143. Now we have to worry about getting a "tent"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now when I go to a casino, someone will be
    checking for computing devices by fiddling
    with my collar......actualy, that's not a bad
    thing at all =)

  144. Is this why the modern collar looks like a book?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because we could fit a library of information
    under there now?

  145. Damnit... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    I'm wearing a henley...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  146. The Governator by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

    If they used this in the California government offices, they could use Gov. Schwarzenegger as tech support.

    Gov't worker: "Oh shucks, my brooch crashed."

    Ahnold: "Do naht wohrry. I will fix it."

    *Squeeze*

    Gov't worker: "Thank you governor!"

    Ahnold: "No prahblem."

  147. Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking? by bugnuts · · Score: 1

    Yes Brain, but where are we going to get a one inch keyboard?

  148. Forget the neck, other body parts are better.... by sheapshearer · · Score: 1

    The collar is not the place for a computer... Computers and sweaty areas of the body don't mix well.

    Now an ankle computer would be a great innovation. Besides looking hip, it could function as an exercise weight, and maybe be powered by walking!

    The true freaks will those be running Seti@Home on their ankles -- and consequently never be allowed to stand still!

    Imagine -- a Riverdance team wearing ankle computers -- a human powered beowulf cluster!

    Ah Crap, Shazbot!

    Welcome to our new ankle-computer overloads!

    Where the hell is Morpheus when we need him?

  149. x10 by MyHair · · Score: 1

    Great! I've been looking for a small wearable computer for my x10 zipper actuator.

  150. bluetooth is the obvious answer by JJJS · · Score: 1

    ok, so the pxa225 has a bluetooth bus built right into it one more chip would make this computer compatible with any number of mice keyboards displays cell phones pdas and any other device. one chip... i think this would be an excellent addition to this device becuase wireless is clearly the direction small computing needs to take

  151. All a matter of scale... by MMHere · · Score: 1

    ...that thing is HUGE!

    (Considering that it's being held by the huge and mighty hand of Lou Ferrigno.)

  152. The porn industry will love this! by fidros · · Score: 1

    Bluetooth controller vaginal vibrators anyone? :-)

    --
    Gilad.
  153. ummmm... by IDigUNIX · · Score: 1

    So if you run Windows on it, are you immediatly a slave to Bill Gates? Ewwwwww...