Slashdot Mirror


Linux for iPod Matures

elinenbe writes "The Linux on iPod Project has just crossed a milestone. Currently their firmware works on all ipod models other then the new mini. Sound plays and for many people it has more features then the original iPod firmware!"

469 comments

  1. Im sorry if i don't quite get it by FS1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why would one run linux on an ipod?

    --
    A Fatal OE Exception has occurred, Sig will now reboot.
    1. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by mister_tim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, but the article FAQ says:

      "1.2 Why would you do that?
      A number of reasons, but mainly because its there."

      But I think you're right overall - this seems a mostly pointless exercise to me

    2. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Nebu · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why would one run linux on an ipod?

      So that you can put an OGG player on there and not have to convert your OGGs whenever you wanna listen to them on the go.

    3. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by mirko · · Score: 1

      Will it transparently sync with itunes or will it be syncable the hard way only ?

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    4. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by cujo_1111 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I am just guessing, but you haven't heard of the Rio Karma, have you?

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    5. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by John+Miles · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Because the reverse-engineering effort needed to make it happen will yield other fruits.

      I'd like to know how to add a remote display and simple button-driven UI to an iPod, for instance. My old PC-based car MP3 player is too big and clunky to fit in my current daily driver, and I'd like to come up with a way to interface its LCD and track-selection buttons to an iPod, using a microcontroller to do the dirty work rather than a whole PC. I'm about to go surf their tech notes to see if they offer any clues, even though I have no intention of running Linux on the iPod (if I can help it).

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    6. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because one cannot leave well enough alone.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    7. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Nebu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Will it transparently sync with itunes or will it be syncable the hard way only ?

      Straight from the site's FAQ: Probably. At this point the software support is still very immature. I haven't tried any of the software available for accessing the iTunes database under Linux.

      If someone donates me an iPod, I'll gladly try it out and tell ya if it works. ;)

    8. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by djroute66 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Remember how Peter Jackson used an iPod as a storage method? This is an example of how an iPod can do more than just be an MP3 player. With a fully customizable operating system with the GNU tools you have no ends of the possibilities.

    9. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Then don't comment. Really, who cares if YOU see no purpose in this. What, are you just trying to belittle the guy because you deem his work unworthy of your attention?

      Sorry if that was harsh, but I'm sick of hearing people gripe about this EVERY TIME A STORY LIKE THIS APPEARS. Keep in mind that one of the primary reasons computers -- and I suppose a lot of technology -- exists as it does today was not because of some marketing suit at Microsoft or Apple thinking of what the next profit-generating product would be, but rather the tinkerings of curious individuals that seemed almost silly at the time.

      It takes little intelligence to downplay someone's efforts, but it takes a good bit more to see where they may be going with it and the potential uses. And from what I've seen, people of the former persuasion are generally what I would consider straight up consumers, and that's just sad.

    10. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thought the iPod didn't have to horsepower to decode vorbis. IIRC most mp3 players have an actual hardware chip that decodes the files, and i also remember a story on here a few months back about the first ogg vorbis decoder chip. Coming soon to cereal boxes near you...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    11. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps you should concentrate on the road and not get distracted by buttons, scroll-wheels, and displays.

    12. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Bobdoer · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hey, you stupid kids, stop poking well enough and leave him alone!"

    13. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya but podmaster works just fine for that you dont need linux for storage. I usually find moding a waste of time and potentially dangerous. on the other hand if some ported Zelda on to it id be down!

    14. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by jx100 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the iPod has a(2?) relatively powerful chip used in decoding MP3. Usually hardware decoder chips are not too powerful, because they are optimised only for decoding the one format. Because the iPod's chip is more powerful, it can be more easily programmed to do other things.

    15. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by John+Miles · · Score: 1

      perhaps you should concentrate on the road and not get distracted by buttons, scroll-wheels, and displays.

      I couldn't agree more, actually. That's why I want to stick with a proven UI that requires almost zero "pilot workload."

      Using an actual iPod while driving ought to be punishable by thirty days in Driver's Ed.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    16. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by CableModemSniper · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the site Tremor (the integer only implemnetation of ogg/vorbis) currently decodes at approx. 80% of real-time on the iPod.

      --
      Why not fork?
    17. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by TechniMyoko · · Score: 0
      Then don't comment. Really, who cares if YOU see no purpose in this. What, are you just trying to belittle the guy because you deem his work unworthy of your attention?

      Since you dont care that they dont care, why are you psoting then?

    18. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would one want OGGs anyway? Open Source!=must be good Free!=must be good (especially in the case of linux) Not only that, it doesnt play OGGs at the moment Despite being more powerful than most mp3 players, that doesnt mean it ever will be able to. iPod's note feature has a 4k limit, if that applies to other things, it'll never play ogg.

    19. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      "Petrol", not "gas" :)

    20. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by aastanna · · Score: 1

      I would love to be able to plug in a digital camera directly and have the pictures copied automatically directly to the iPod. Then there would be no need to carry around a laptop on vacation to store pictures, just bring the iPod and you have an instand 20-40 gig memory card.

      If linux on the iPod could do that I'd install it...at least for vacations...

    21. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by tartanblue · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or you haven't heard of the Neuros: it has Ogg Vorbis, MP3, and WMA support.

      They've got a dedicated development team based in Chicago and they just shared the source to their syncing application.

      Disclaimer: I don't work for these guys, but I do own a Neuros 20GB and love the thing.

      Tartanblue

      --
      TartanBlue
    22. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Damek · · Score: 1

      Vorbis Fan: hands to ears - La la la la la la, I can't hear you, La la la la la la...

    23. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember how Peter Jackson used an iPod as a storage method? This is an example of how an iPod can do more than just be an MP3 player. With a fully customizable operating system with the GNU tools you have no ends of the possibilities.

      One other thing I can think of is related to that. iPod has some stupid crap built in that hamstrings its true potential functionality for purposes of DRM. You can store files on the disk and retrieve them, but unless you go through Apple's software iPod (under 2.1 firmware) will not recognize them even if you drop them correctly named, in the correct directory structure. Wouldn't it be great to have an ipod that worked as a portable HDD and a music player with zero strings attached either way, I think so...

    24. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 0

      Does this mean I'd get to play OGG files on the iPOD? As far as I know, there are only two players that support OGG (iRiver, and one other, but that one requires a firmware upgrade).

      --
      /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
    25. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So what do you have to smoke (and how much of it) before that sounds like it's playing at the correct speed?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    26. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Durandal64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can already sort of do it with Griffin's media reader attachment. When your camera's memory card gets full, just take it out, plug it into the media reader, and all your pictures get stored on the iPod.

    27. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Manfre · · Score: 1

      I'm still holding out for Alarm Clock Linux!!! Hitting snooze will feel so much better!!

    28. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by menacing_cheese · · Score: 1

      Could you point out where exactly the grandparent belittled anyone? He asked why you would want linux on an iPod. I think its a legitimate question. If there is an answer, why don't you give it next time without all the sanctimonious bullshit about curious individuals and innovation.

    29. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by edbarrett · · Score: 1
      Why would one want OGGs anyway?
    30. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by maloneoni · · Score: 0

      viva la open source!!

    31. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by hyperpixel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's an excellent exercise in porting Linux to new devices. We need people like this who are willing to flex their expertise and knowledge of embedded systems.

    32. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that my favorite album would be 20% longer on this.

      Sweet!

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    33. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by TechniMyoko · · Score: 0

      If youwanted that, buy a Terrapin Mine it runs linux *shudder*, plays mp3s, and works as portable storage for digital cameras

    34. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by TechniMyoko · · Score: 0

      The iPod tries to keep a database of all songs. While working on my iPod I found it quite useful. Not allowing the iPod to just accept files was done to 1)encourage the use of the database, and 2) they may have been to lazy to code the ability to edit the database into the iPod's OS

    35. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Richard_J_N · · Score: 1

      Erm - the ipod (as supplied by Apple) doesn't have the horsepower to decode mp3s properly either! I got a 2nd gen ipod, and it mangled mp3s of classical music at 256kbps. After a long investigation, including trying a demo model in the shop, and a 2 month wrangle with Apple's ghastly tech support, I returned it for a refund. But I'd buy another one if I can have Linux/Ogg on it.

    36. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it would decode at the normal speed. 20% of the processor would stay idle because there is nothing more for it to do, thats a good thing.

    37. Re:Im sorry if i don't quite get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it's 'casualty' not 'emergency'.

  2. There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by tcopeland · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...although, as the announcement says, "Most things seem to be working but there are still some problems with IDE & the framebuffer."

    Wired has an article on this, too.

    1. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by mikeee · · Score: 5, Funny

      So, other than the storage and display it's fine?

    2. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Well, you can probably access the CPU over a serial console thorugh the USB or Firewire somehow. What would anybody want in a Linux system besides the BASH prompt??

      --
      ---
    3. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by loginx · · Score: 5, Funny

      There might also be a few problems with the audio not working...

      Everything else appears th be just fine though...

    4. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Funny
      And input is still glitchy....

      ...but other than that, we're aces all around.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by capmilk · · Score: 2, Funny
      > What would anybody want in a Linux system besides the BASH prompt??

      A tcsh prompt.

    6. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by OdinHuntr · · Score: 1

      Makes a great hand grenade, really.

    7. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by nfsilkey · · Score: 1

      But APM works!

    8. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by tntguy · · Score: 0, Funny

      You misspelled Zsh.

    9. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes a great hand grenade, really.

      Unfortunately the detonator hasn't been ported yet, but other than that, it's fine.

    10. Re:There's even a port of the 2.6 kernel... by pVoid · · Score: 1
      Right, I'll get right on it tonight and install apache that'll be the bomb - the world's smallest slowest most expensive webserver.

      Shiny though.

  3. Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone know enough about the IPOD architecture to say if it would be possible to fix up this linux to play OGGs? All I want for xmas is a cool MP3 player that plays mp3s and oggs :)

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll settle for Easter OGGs

    2. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by kinzillah · · Score: 3, Informative

      May I suggest the Rio Karma?

      --
      Douglas P. Price
    3. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Nebu · · Score: 1

      According to the site's FAQ, there's an OGG player that plays at "80% realtime", whatever that means. They expect a running ogg player on there "soon".

    4. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by cujo_1111 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The OGG player runs at 80% of normal speed. So when you play rave music it sounds like house music, when you play speed metal music it sounds like metal music but when you play pop music it still sounds like crap.

      If only they could get the OGG player to play at 150% speed, then all music would be chipmunk music...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    5. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. >2x the battery life to boot. It comes with a Java sync manager that works with Linux too. And it costs less.

    6. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Monkelectric · · Score: 0, Redundant

      OMFG thats COOL! Its time to retire my archos 6000! Thanks for the link

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    7. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by BillyBlaze · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's hope for real-time playback, not just 80%. See here, someone is working on it again, and others think the hardware is sufficient.

    8. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by DakotaK · · Score: 1

      I have a Karma, and I couldn't be happier.
      It's never given me a problem, aside from one time it decided to rebuild the database and delete 100-some odd tracks, and even that was an exercise in plugging it back into the network and reuploading the songs. True, it's not as thin as the iPod (a friend of mine accuratly described it as 'like a brownie') and a bit heavier, but IMO it's superior. The ogg playback, the network interface, slick file manager, and good pricetag have all lead to my cherishing it.
      Nothing beats jamming to the Swingin' Utters and Mr. Scruff in study hall while doing calculus.

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    9. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rio Karma is what you're looking for !

    10. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by modecx · · Score: 1

      I would also reccomend the iRiver 20GB equivalent

      Battery life is excelent. It comes with a remote, which works well in a car--with shuffle mode, just hit one of the nobbers and it ffwds. It plays Vorbis files beautifully, and it has optical inputs and outputs--awesome to use with the home theatre system, voice recording capability (also works pretty damn good).

      I just got one of these a couple weeks ago, and I'm very happy with it. I did my fair share of research, apparently Karmas' firmware was beta quality at best, and that's a big reason I went with the iRiver (and heck, for a gadget geek/wanna-be portable audiophile, it can't be beat)

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    11. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by TechniMyoko · · Score: 0

      sure, but they work for apple and if they wanted OGG to be playable, and if it were possible, it would be by now

    12. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Drakonian · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have *very* good reason to believe the iPod hardware is sufficient to play MP3s at real-time. ;)

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    13. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're a fucking idiot, you know that? they're talking about OGG, and you spew this shit about MP3s.

    14. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by klasikahl · · Score: 0, Troll

      iRiver iHP-140 (40 GB)

      iRiver iHP-120 (20 GB)

      Supports OGG, built in mic, optical out, mounts as a USB portable harddrive under linux (I use rsync to update my tunes), size and weight versus iPod are moot, and it's a nice black and silver instead of a (*ducks*) feminine white.

    15. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fucking karma whore.

    16. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'll be wanting the iAudio M3 that's just been released in Korea and due in other regions around the 16th April: Google SearchString="iAudio M3"

    17. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i-river players ?
      they are one of the best around and now most of them come with ogg support. just can't wait final ogg-supporting firmware version for my imp-400...

    18. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by onco_p53 · · Score: 1

      Anyone working on Linux for the Karma?
      I have been waiting for months now for the new firmware to fix up the "disappearing tracks" bug.

    19. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is a Karma whore.

    20. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do Linux users really care about ogg support? I mean do some of you actually bother encoding in something other than mp3?

    21. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Lord+of+the+Wazz · · Score: 1

      I did my fair share of research, apparently Karmas' firmware was beta quality at best, and that's a big reason I went with the iRiver

      I don't think you can have done too much research then. I've had an iHP120 for a few months now and the firmware is holding back what would otherwise be a fantastic piece of kit.

      Take a look on the iRiver forums and you'll find large numbers of disgruntled users.

    22. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by modecx · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I read many many posts like those. But their issues were non-issues to me.

      Their bitches:
      • No database support for Oggs/wma--BFD. My entire collection is folder organized anyway, and it works wonderfully.
      • Battery life--I've no issues. I'm happily using Ogg at Q6, which is a very happy medium between quality and size (and hence refreshing of the player cache is minimized), I haven't fully discharged the player yet, even with playing it all damn day 8 hours+ (the one day it got down 1 bar, I forgot to turn the optical out off, but it still lasted 6 hours, even with lots of shuffling). Better than the competition, apparently.
      • Recording of FM--I didn't by it for the FM; it's nice that it's there, but I wouldn't record from FM anyway, unless it were perhaps some engaging talk show.
      • Non-support of DRM formats--This was a big factor in my decision to buy this thing. I have no use for DRM music, don't need any, and don't want any--absolutely don't need it on a portable player. Of course, I knew about this going in, and frankly I'm quite pleased. I'd rather rip my albums, so I can retain my organization anyway.


      Other random issues/tapping/static. I haven't experienced this, and Iv'e got very good ears. I hear the flyback on pretty much all TVs, absolutely drives me insane. I can hear mt wrist watch (which I wear on my belt-strap if I ever wear it), ticking noises/water dropping likewise drives me nuts. If there were a problem, I'd have smashed it by now.

      The one thing I really didn't like was the hat switch. I've just never cared for them. I have one on my Samsung TV remote, too. Same exaxc thing, infact. It was too easy to press it straight down, rather than in the D-Pad directions. I say didn't, because I've largely eliminated the problem. I cut out a circle of some 3M sidewalk graphic vinyl. It's serriously bumpy stuff, feels like rubber, and has the texture of concrete, with adhesive that's meant to grab onto concrete--it ain't going nowhere. It's solved that problem, it's now very easy to use the hat switch, and I put a piece on my TV remote while I was at it.

      If there is something specific that you have an issue with, I'd be interested to hear about it, but I already knew about most of the issues that were present when I bought it, and I'm jim-dandy-happy with it so far (despite the few limitations it has, it's got more features than any player I know, and it's quite good at what it does, IMHO).
      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    23. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you, i beat you to that joke last night bitch.

    24. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by Lord+of+the+Wazz · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I probably didn't give you enough credit after reading your original comment (figured you were still in the honeymoon period :-)

      I have 3 issues with the device that I would like to see fixed:

      1) The issue with playlists and the database not being able to cope with files longer than 51 characters. I find this to be an issue as I like to organise my music so that it is structured as ARTIST/ALBUM/TRACK# - ARTIST - TRACK NAME.

      2) Database only supports mp3. I've recently started encoding my CDs as Ogg instead of mp3. At the moment I'm using the tree structure for selecting tracks. This is fine but I'd rather use the database. I know that there is 3rd party software to create a database but I find it kind of stupid that Ogg support is one of the device's main selling points but it doesn't support the format as well as mp3.

      3) No on-the-fly playlists. This is an issue simply because just about every other contender to the iPod throne can do this (as well as the iPod itself).

      I like the iHP-120 a lot - I think it looks great and it has amazing potential. I just wish that iRiver would get their fingers out and fix the real issues instead of including almost entirely useless functionality like the lyric support.

    25. Re:Oh man that tickles my linux bone by modecx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, on the fly playlists would be killer. I've got to admit that. It's the one thing that I really like about iTunes.

      I'm actually considering writing a script to generate .m3u playlists, ala the smart-playlist system in iTunes, so one could activate the playlist menu and have something very much like on-the-fly playlists, but the couldn't be smart, of course--there's a few things that would be required to do on the player like play counts, ratings and the like.

      It's just that time thing, eh! Actually I haven't even considered looking to see if such a thing already exists (probably). D'oh!

      The one thing I really would like to see outta the firmware is gapless playback. I have few albums that use that technique to good effect, same that the player can't reproduce it as well, but neither am I rushing to sell mine on eBay 'cause of it ;)

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  4. Command line? by cujo_1111 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do you use a command line interface on an ipod?

    --
    If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    1. Re:Command line? by Nebu · · Score: 5, Informative

      How do you use a command line interface on an ipod?

      If you read the documentation, it says when the iPod boots the Linux kernel it will automatically configure its local ethernet device (ethernet over firewire/IEEE1394) and then starts inetd so that network connections via telnet may be made.

      The default configuration is for the iPod to use 192.10.1.2 and to allow telnet connections. The default address may be changed by editing the /etc/rc script.

    2. Re:Command line? by Zadeus · · Score: 1

      Embedded devices don't usually operate through command-line. But I would love such a feature on an iPod!

      --

      Don't let people drive you crazy when you know it's in walking distance
    3. Re:Command line? by McCrapDeluxe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Scrollwheel moves through a list of letters. Middle button confirms selected letter.

    4. Re:Command line? by aardvarko · · Score: 1

      Ever gotten a high score in pinball?

    5. Re:Command line? by System.out.println() · · Score: 4, Funny

      The scroll/touch wheel wouldn't be too hard to turn into a keyboard. spinspinspin TAP spinspinspinspin TAP, you've got "ls".

    6. Re:Command line? by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it by a minute, but I've got the karma bonus so :P

    7. Re:Command line? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      However, Backspace won't work until you can get vi up and running and figure out how to tweak your termcap.

      Better start spinning and clicking now.

      --
      ---
    8. Re:Command line? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      That's IP over Firewire, not Ethernet over Firewire

    9. Re:Command line? by End11 · · Score: 2, Funny

      TELNET?? surely thats insecure!!
      i'll just have to wait untill they get openbsd running on it, with ssh

      --

      Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
    10. Re:Command line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hope to god you're not serious, you sound like one of those people who would abolish telnet from ever being used again, in any capacity, anywhere on earth, for any reason, no matter whether or not it was actually a security hole.

      in short, fuck you.

    11. Re:Command line? by Bilestoad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Generally I don't give a shit about desktop Linux because the UI is crap. I tend to think of Linux desktop users as people fighting against reality for idealogical reasons. However, when the UI is out of the picture it's great.

      I use Linux on a server for FLAC/MP3 serving with Slimserver from slim devices. The UI in that case is a simple web interface, no command line required. It does the job it's supposed to do, and I don't much have to care what else it does. Windows in that situation would be too complicated and perhaps not capable of the very long uptimes my Linux box gets.

      On the iPod, it's a lot like the Apple iPod UI - task oriented, simple functions that do one thing well - or at least it will be when it's polished. Which is fine, I don't much care if Apple patent or copyright or sue or whatever. As long as I get to have menu items like "Capture from CF" and "Record" without buying garbage like the Belkin accessories that enable those functions (the Belkin CF reader should NOT be sold. It is incomplete, useless with RAW images). To think that Linux is going to let me use my iPod in more useful ways is awesome.

      It's the first Linux project I've ever thought I could be interested in contributing to. Well done guys! (and let's not forget the ucLinux people, who have been working for quite some time to get where they are.)

    12. Re:Command line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a bad guy has physical access to your iPod, or to its FireWire port, I'd say the iPod is already pretty insecure.

    13. Re:Command line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or maybe he was joking...

    14. Re:Command line? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like he's beating your whoring ass now.

    15. Re:Command line? by zhenlin · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of this joke:

      NEW TECHNOLOGY ANNOUNCEMENT FROM APPLE

      In a surprise announcment, yesterday, Apple Computer said that it is finally doing away with the keyboard. Apple stated that the microcomputer user has suffered too long with this awkward and inefficient input device. According to an Apple spokesperson, the technology for replacing the keyboard with only a mouse is here and the computer user is ready for it. The spokesperson said that Apple has received a steady stream of complaints over the years about the need to constantly move the hands between the Mac keyboard and mouse. "The solution was obvious - do away with the keyboard completely."

      Acknowledging that there are still a few Mac applications that depend on textual input in addition to graphical manipulation, Apple said the poor people stuck with such outdated technology have not been forgotten. They are introducing the Spinning Alphabet Wheel (SAW) to replace the keyboard. The SAW is a screen display object consisting of concentric circular strips showing all of the characters which normally appear on the keyboard. The wheel rotates continuously under character selector windows. The user selects a character by placing the mouse pointer in the appropriate window at the same time as the desired character is about the appear. "...and, ta-da, the selected character appears on the screen just as though it had been typed on an old fashioned keyboard."

      "This is a marvelous new technology with plenty of room for growth." said the spokesperson. For example, the user can configure separate wheels for vowels vs. the consonants. Or, digits can be placed on their own special low speed wheel. "We have conceptualized the keyboard as a big, bulky menu selection device and replaced it with dynamic display menus instead. Apple will eventually replace all menus with their new Rotating Wheel Technology (RWT)."

      When asked why the wheels have to rotate, the spokesperson said that Apple's engineers had considered using conventional "point-and- click" technology for the wheel. "However," the Apple spokesperson said, "we feel that this type of operation is too complicated for the typical Mac user. So, we have done away with the mouse button too. It is still hard for us to believe that the IBM world has stepped backwards in technology by providing two or more buttons to confuse the user. The IBM compatible sector, apparently, has not yet recognized that 95% of computer usage is devoted to experimenting with different fonts and character styles in documents"

      Asked if this new technology would reduce the price of the typical Mac computer, the spokesperson countered that it would probably increase the price of the Mac. "After all, display space is already scarce on the current screen. We will now deliver Macs with two screens - one for the normal display and a larger one for the multitude of rotating wheels the user needs to access." Apple said that the user who is confused by complicated devices such as keyboards and mouse buttons will gladly pay a premium to avoid them. "In fact, the easily-confused user is our best customer" replied the spokesperson. "Not only are we doing away with the pesky keyboard, but we are also giving them something they have demanded for a long time - more screen space. This is definitely a win-win situation."

      Beta testers of the new technology were impressed by its ease of use, but said there are still some minor problems to work out. For example, one tester left his machine unattended with the uppercase character wheel spinning at medium speed. While he was away somebody must have jarred his desk, moving the mouse pointer into the selector window. When he got back he found that his Word document now had one huge paragraph consisting of all of the characters of the uppercase alphabet repeated 2,539,987 times. "At first glance, this appeared to be a big problem. But, I formatted the new paragraph with 33 different fonts and 11 different type styles and it looked great. I hope that Apple fixes this problem before they release it, because these accidents can greatly increase the time spent formatting documents."
    16. Re:Command line? by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      He didn't say TO an iPod he said ON an iPod. slight difference there no?

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    17. Re:Command line? by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      192.10.1.2? I wonder how Symbolics, Inc. feels about that, being the owners of 192.10.0.0/16 and all.

      Perhaps they meant to use 192.168.1.2? Where do I file a bug report?

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  5. Just dandy... now I can...? by fname · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is great, now that Linux can run on the iPod I can.... play music? Pretty good stuff. Now I don't have to rely on Apple's crappy interface or poor integration with iTunes.

    Honestly, I know this projects are mostly for shits & giggles, but the iPod seems to be about the least-appropriate MP3 player to port Linux too. You're paying a premium for software design & integration with the iPod. Linux on the Dell version would seem to be a more natural fit.

    1. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by iabervon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're also paying a premium for hardware design. The sand-proof controls are a real win. I doubt it would be especially hard to implement the interface (although it was probably hard to design it the first time). As for why, you might want to play ogg files. I'm not entirely sure where the system is actually stored, but you might be able to take one of the minis, remove the hard drive (and sell it for more than the cost of the ipod), and put in a CF 802.11 card. Then you could stream music from your computer or over the internet while wearing it around the house.

    2. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Funny

      I propose a theorum: It does not matter how expensive a device is, some nerd will castigate and cripple it for no readily explainable reason other than pure anarchic hubris.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theorems are not proposed, they are demostrated.

    4. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I demonstrate: this website! HAHAHA.

      I need a fucking beer.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    5. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by moxruby · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then you could stream music from your computer or over the internet while wearing it around the house.

      Back in my day, we had no fancy shmancy ipods to wear around the house. We just turned the volume on the stereo up.

    6. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by baddogatl · · Score: 1

      Nearly every inch of the Georgia Tech campus has wireless accessibility. Even the busses and shuttles update their positions wirelessly on the transportation website in real-time.

      Add to this fact the number of students listening to their iPods on the bus, walking to classes, even in class. Wireless? Talk about an all-time high of in-class absenteeism. Add a powerpoint viewer to it and it's be the most complete accessory on campus :)

    7. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that bothers you why?

    8. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      There is nothing wrong with playing around with stuff. That's where most of the big ideas come from.

      Quantum pysics started when Paxwell Planck was playing around with fire and asked himself "why does a black piece of metal turn red then white if you heat it enough?".

      --
      evil is as evil does
    9. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not entirely sure where the system is actually stored, but you might be able to take one of the minis, remove the hard drive (and sell it for more than the cost of the ipod), and put in a CF 802.11 card.

      Hang on, hang on. Stop right there. Let me think for a minute........

      By jove, I think you've done it! The answer is:

      1. Buy iPod mini
      2. Remove the hard drive
      3. (The missing step revealed...) Sell it for more than the cost of the iPod
      4. Profit!!!

      I knew, I just knew if I kept reading Slashdot, eventually I'd find out the secret.

    10. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how the fuck is merely listening to music 'in-class absenteeism'?

      people that think listening to music while working/learning/whatever is a detriment can suck my ass as i continue to listen to music anytime i can, at work or otherwise.

    11. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... First of all, the mini's hard disk does not comply with the full ide specs, and so you can't use it in anything but the ipod mini. That's why the mini costs less than the separate hd's. They're segmenting the market.

      Secondly, without built-in drivers, 802.11 cards aren't going to work. Maybe if the linux firmware supports it. But how would you boot the firmware if there's no hd?

    12. Re:Just dandy... now I can...? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Stereo? You were lucky. We had to march around playing our own instruments and singing. And my father made me march with the piano.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  6. And with the AAC announcment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe apple really is an "open" company, they just didnt want anyone to know =)

    1. Re:And with the AAC announcment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be REALLY funny if we found out that OS X was built on something open source like BSD or something?

      Wait.....

  7. Sighs... by moosesocks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let me reiterate this for the last time.

    On an MP3 player, the ability to run EMACS is not a feature. The lack of music-playing ability also seems like a pitfall.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:Sighs... by G27+Radio · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sorry to see you got modded down for that. For what it's worth, I got a good laugh out of your comment.

    2. Re:Sighs... by l0ss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I don't think this should have been modded down. Aside from being pretty humorous, it's also relatively insightful.

    3. Re:Sighs... by leomekenkamp · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not? I also use EMACS on my home machine to play music...

      (ducks)

      --
      Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
    4. Re:Sighs... by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      "- Uli's moose"

      Hope you've seen this little gem. Ahh, that brings back the memories...

    5. Re:Sighs... by magpie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your right, but the ability to run VI is an essential.

      *ducks*

  8. DMCA Being Violated! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    This is obviously a violation of the DMCA. I hope these criminals rot in hell.

  9. Re:troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lick my ass you monkey fucker

  10. my Linux for iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    my Linux for iPod already has breasts and pubic hair. and still maturing every day.

    1. Re:my Linux for iPod by kai5263499 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but can it serve up monochrome pictures of itself with it's fresh port of apache?

      --
      -Wes
  11. Re:Why?? by cujo_1111 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, you are wrong. Only *BSD is dying...

    --
    If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
  12. Say what? by numbski · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where are you getting "for many it has more features than the original firmware" from?

    Seems to me everything is very basic, unless you count the ability to browse by file a new feature, but the datbase accessibility of the original firmware is conspicuously missing.

    Still...I like it. The iPod has a usb bus. A firewire bus. Throughput is an issue, but I imagine some hotplug devices will get support. ;) How's about automount picking up on another iPod plugged into the firewire bus and mounting it fat32, access it's database, copy the files over and naming them logically based on either id3 tags or on the database, and then update the localhost database? >:)

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:Say what? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, if you consider "Runs Linux" a feature, that's one thing this adds.

      Of course, when I bought my car, I didn't check to see who had manufactured the chassis. I sure as shit didn't rip it apart trying to build my own. Maybe I'm missing something here. Or maybe I'm not a fucking idiot with too much time on his hands.

      No, that can't be it. Look at my website!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno. I prefer file/directory browsing to play MP3s. The database thing on my iPod gets annoying at times.

    3. Re:Say what? by GoRK · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, the USB in the ipod is not host mode, so you can't really attach something to it; but firewire is a different story.. In theory you could do all kinds of things with that.

    4. Re:Say what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a crack in my screen and your website uses colors that make it look worse.

      Please change your colors.

      </sarcasm>

    5. Re:Say what? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Uh, my website doesn't use ANY colours. Please adjust your gamma.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:Say what? by dave420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I already wrote one of those, but for Windows. It uses PHP to parse the iTunesDB file on the ipod, and it extracts the MP3s off the ipod to the disk, storing them in an artist > album > song directory structure, re-tagging the mp3s with the fields from the iTunesDB file. It even makes .m3u playlists from the playlists on the ipod... It can also update a MySQL database with the song details, which I use for powering my web-based ipod streaming software. I can listen to my ipod wherever I am. It even caches the mp3s on my work PC (I have a lot of hard disk space), so when the ipod's disconnected, the web-interface still works. I can sit at home listening to my ipod over an SSH tunnel and wireless access :-P That's as portable as I want my music :)

  13. Linux on an iPod? by Perdition · · Score: 5, Funny

    Begun the "KDE looks better on iPod than Gnome" war has.

    --
    Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
    1. Re:Linux on an iPod? by aardvarko · · Score: 1

      It's a moot point - no X on iPod! Framebuffer doesn't support mmap(). And I was so looking forward to bludgeoning some Gnomes. :~(

    2. Re:Linux on an iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go GNOME

    3. Re:Linux on an iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "KDE looks better on iPod than Gnome"

      I disagree - I think KDE looks better on Gnome than iPod.

    4. Re:Linux on an iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up Bill

    5. Re:Linux on an iPod? by Barto · · Score: 1

      Pfft. KDE looks better on everything, you know that.

      Barto

    6. Re:Linux on an iPod? by Xelrach · · Score: 1

      KDE? I run XFce on my iPod.

  14. about your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Please fix your gay and annoying sig. At least change the word "image" to "imagine"--that way it won't be annoying anymore.

    1. Re:about your sig by inertia187 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There, is that better?

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  15. Someday... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    people will think of putting Linux on a PC!

  16. Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't get me wrong, I love Linux (I manage an 80-node Linux Beowulf cluster at work) for the things that it's good it. But why would you take a working iPod and install Linux on it? It's not as if you get a discount on your iPod for running Linux. And it's not as if the Linux community has produced a wealth of iPod "killer apps." Straight out of the box, the iPod does what it's supposed to do. And until Linux has native support for some of the consumer technologies that make the iPod so cool (i.e., DirectX) what is the point of installing Linux on it? I realize that there's a certain "cool factor" involved with being able to run Linux on (insert consumer electronics device here), but at what point does one cross the line from usability over to zealotry? The fact that I can run Linux on my toaster isn't going to help me make bagels in the morning.

  17. try reading the FAQ by aaron+p.+matthews · · Score: 2, Informative

    3.3 Is there a OGG player
    The Tremor player is running at about 80% real-time. Apparently an update is on the way so hopefully that will provide some speed-up.

  18. Lots of possibilities by (exu)+$viality$ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even though many of you ask, "Why??" the news of a new OS for the iPod does present some interesting possibilities. iPods could be used as webservers (a webserver in the palm of your hand) or fileservers. Now that would be cool.

    --
    "I know kung-fu" -Neo, The Matrix
    1. Re:Lots of possibilities by cujo_1111 · · Score: 2, Funny

      a webserver in the palm of your hand

      You are gonna need one hell of an firewire extension cord when you are on the go...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    2. Re:Lots of possibilities by bwy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but why would you do that when you can buy a Zaurus that fits in your hand and comes with Linux, a nifty keyboard, and a CF slot for your WiFi card all for around a buck fifty?

      It is like turning a G4 Cube into an aquarium, only worse. No, maybe it is like running Linux on a iBook. Or having the leather seats in your Porche replaced with vinyl. It is one of those things that is so bad, the whole "because I can" argument doesn't even hold up.

    3. Re:Lots of possibilities by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, sure would. Except:

      1) The iPod does not have any networking capabilities. You'd have to plug it in to a slave device to get this functionality, and in doing so you'd still have little more than a hard drive.

      2) If you really want to waste your time making a palm sized file or webserver, you'd be much better off with a pocket PC or miniATX machine. Seeing as these already operate as a web/file server in the palm of your hand, really you add nothing by doing the same with an iPod.

      3) WTF do you want a portable file server for in the first place? File servers are supposed to be STATIONARY. That's why they're servers...so they can efficiently deliver you files without you having to get up! If the fucking thing is a portable hard drive already, you'd be much better off just copying files from it. The extra overhead and memory cost are just going to slow down the transfer, which would be inefficient to start with considering the kludges you'd have to pull to get the thing on the network (without slaving it to a PC).

      4) Anybody who thinks that an inefficient, clunky interface podged onto an MP3 devices just to make it a webserver is cool should really consider devoting some of their energy to real problems in computing.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Lots of possibilities by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      iPod = 40 gigs, Zaurus = 64 megs last time i checked.
      Also the last Zaurus I saw was $600. How much are they now?

    5. Re:Lots of possibilities by System.out.println() · · Score: 0

      2) If you really want to waste your time making a palm sized file or webserver, you'd be much better off with a pocket PC or miniATX machine.

      The iPod is measured in gigabytes, not megabytes. That's the first thing.

      3) WTF do you want a portable file server for in the first place? File servers are supposed to be STATIONARY. That's why they're servers...so they can efficiently deliver you files without you having to get up!

      Ever heard of a thumbdrive? Guess what that is.... a file server! Though granted, the iPod is ALREADY a fileserver in that sense.

      But jsut because you like your fileservers to be stationary doesn't mean everyone does.

      4) Anybody who thinks that an inefficient, clunky interface podged onto an MP3 devices just to make it a webserver is cool should really consider devoting some of their energy to real problems in computing.


      Depends on how you define "cool", really....

    6. Re:Lots of possibilities by (exu)+$viality$ · · Score: 1

      and the ipod does have networking capabilities. apple released IP over Firewire some time back...i suppose the ipod could be tweaked to get internet access.

      --
      "I know kung-fu" -Neo, The Matrix
    7. Re:Lots of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You sound like an asshole. Are you an asshole? I'm just saying because you really sound like one, is all.

    8. Re:Lots of possibilities by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      In no sense whatsoever is the iPod a fileserver. Maybe you IT wannabes don't know this, but a fileserver is a computer that has been designed to maximize file delivery on a network. It generally has a lot of RAID'd storage and a lot of access methods. Ours runs Samba, NFS, AppleTalk, FTP, SFTP/SCP and WebDAV, just for completeness. Here's how a fileserver works: a client makes a request for a file, the server loads it from the drive and queues it up in memory, and begins feeding it back to the user. The client cannot actually read the physical medium on the drive, thus preventing a rogue client from thrashing the disc.

      Your thumbdrives, flash cards, and iPod hard drives run FUCK ALL in way of file access protocols. They expect the host computer to do all of the work involved with accessing filesystems. If the host wants a file, it has to go into the very bloody bits and find it. A rogue host can easily thrash the disc. These are devices for file storage, not file serving.

      The main reasons for running a file server are to permit multiple clients to access data at the same time, provide access to larger amounts of storage than the clients have locally, and to provide a unified location for backups. The iPod, being a relatively slow device designed for a sequential file access with a limited amount of space is distinctly unqualified for any of these activities. A BSD box with a few terrabytes of raided discs and a couple nics is much more like it. Unfortunately, you cannot yet fit such a setup in your hands, ergo most useful fileservers are not designed on portable audio platforms.

      I guess, within the bounds hackerdom, I define something as cool when it permits me to perform radical new activities. Webserving is hardly a radical nor new activity.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    9. Re:Lots of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. An iPod running Linux is a higher spec "Fileserver" than the hardware that put Novell on the map.

    10. Re:Lots of possibilities by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1, Funny

      Of course. Many of us assholes devote our time to debunking useless and stupid ideas on slashdot. Not all of us feel the need to post anonymously, though. It takes some of the fun out of it if they can't holler back.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    11. Re:Lots of possibilities by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      I don't think we're here to debate how shitty Novell is. For one thing, we'd be hard pressed to find anybody on the PRO side, besides some washed up fiftysomethings desperately clinging to the idea that Novell's Linux ventures will somehow bring more value than anything else they've done.

      I guess I should salute Novell for one thing, though: Ximian's Mono. Cocking brilliance, that is.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    12. Re:Lots of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are more interested in hearing yourself talk than listening.

      The point is that at one time a 100Mhz CPU, 32MB RAM, 10GB disk, and a 400Mbit network interface would have been better than almost every "fileserver" in existence. There's nothing about the term that implies RAID or terabytes.

    13. Re:Lots of possibilities by Napoleon+Blownapart · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wrote a webserver that ran on a 3G mobile phone once. Is that cool?

    14. Re:Lots of possibilities by bwy · · Score: 1

      I picked up the 5500 about a year ago for $200. I hear you can get that model for around $150 now. Quite the clever device- I had a web server running on it and would walk around the shop asking people to hit an address in their browser and then show them the server was in my hand. People have "adapted" all kinds of Linux apps to the Zaurus.

      Eventually all that got old though and I ended up selling it on E-Bay recently. The fact that it runs Personal Java however would make it my platform of choice if I ever needed to put together a custom PDA app.

    15. Re:Lots of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Whatever. An iPod running Linux is a higher spec "Fileserver" than the hardware that put Novell on the map.

      Sure, and my PocketPC is more powerful than the hardware that put the Apollo on the moon. But what matters is the current state of hardware.

    16. Re:Lots of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, maybe the AC was a little harsh, but he was funny. I'll serve as an interpreter.

      I think he was reacting to your general tone - you had a list of things that couldn't be done, and didn't provide anything constructive. That'll offend many people, especially geeks.

      The worst part was that you were telling other people how they should spend their time and energy and what they should think is cool. This is especially offense to people, because it seems like you're bullying them. And people who see the errors you made (IP over firewire, palm-sized machines not having a hard drive) will feel they're being bullyed by someone ignorant. Pretty much a vision of hell.

      That's my rant; hope it's useful to you when you try to build persuasive arguments in the future. I congradulate you on the responses you provided, and would make you a friend if your tone wasn't so crass.

    17. Re:Lots of possibilities by Clith · · Score: 1
      1) The iPod does not have any networking capabilities.

      Haven't you heard of IP over FireWire?

      --
      [ReidNews]
    18. Re:Lots of possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you had a list of things that couldn't be done, and didn't provide anything constructive. That'll offend many people, especially geeks.

      Bzzzzt.
      You have just described the Dean campaign, which was the darling of so many geeks.

  19. Re:Why?? by drexelmike · · Score: 1

    BSD dying? Isn't Darwin BSD based? and thus OSX BSD based? In order to be slightly on-topic, I guess I could see the point of installing linux on an iPod. Imagine a beowolf clu.......

  20. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Mainly a "because we can" thing. Now all them nerds can make a Beowulf cluster while riding the subway.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  21. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes but....you'll like.....have the SOURCE

  22. Two Words - Stereo Recording by ericdano · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would happily put linux on my iPod if it would record stereo tracks. I hear it is technically possible, but.........no one has anything other than those crap voice recorders (mono).

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Two Words - Stereo Recording by smilinggoat · · Score: 1

      I would happily put linux on my iPod if it would record stereo tracks. I hear it is technically possible...

      You hear it is? What sources have you?

    2. Re:Two Words - Stereo Recording by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Archos has stereo recorders, you just need to hook the line in up to something that supplies sterio.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:Two Words - Stereo Recording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Archos Jukebox can do that, and after its rebate, was only $105. If you already have an Ipod, tough luck, otherwise, but teh 20gig archos.

    4. Re:Two Words - Stereo Recording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello? We are talking about the iPOD...........RTFA!!!

    5. Re:Two Words - Stereo Recording by damiam · · Score: 1

      The iPod has a fucking Firewire input. You could stream 50 channels of uncompressed audio over that (although the hard drive couldn't take it). I'm sure two channels can be arranged.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  23. Web servers by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    You don't need a full blown OS to run a web server. Indeed Microchip has an appnote showing how you can run a web server on a PIC micro. The whole thing fits in the backshell of a D9 connector. (ie. less than 1sq inch of real estate). Sure it is limited, but is is a web server.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Web servers by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      Zilog built one. A webserver and TCP/IP Stack on a chip. Pretty friggin small too, I think it can only handle a few (30-300) connections but the thing is seriously the size of a processor die, including package and pins.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    2. Re:Web servers by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

      The PIC one can only handle one connection at a time I think. Not much challenge to /. it :-). The PIC used only has 8 pins (SO8 package).

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
  24. Who put Tux into that little box? by Xilo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anybody know if he's claustrophobic? Such a little window, geez..

    Next generation power for iPods.. Tux running on an exercise wheel?

    --
    Read; Write; Execute
    1. Re:Who put Tux into that little box? by Damiano · · Score: 3, Funny

      Umm... Tux doesn't *need* Windows.

  25. Re:Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're new here aren't you?

    Damn newbies and their ignorance to old slashdot jokes...

  26. I can't wait until it runs the Parrot VM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I can run Mops anywhere!

  27. Why not use these skills for something useful ? by jdifool · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I know the 'subject' seems flamebait, but let me explain.

    Linux on an Ipod is basically pointless. Especially on this very device, which is what hip people buy in the first place (don't get me wrong, I have one). That doesn't mean people can't tweak with it, but it's not that useful, since the geek population using iPods is outnumbered by the common consumers.

    On the other hand, what about making a file browser that allow you to go through the files you stored on your pod ? I usually store isos, books, games, and the like on my 30Gb, and I really would like to be able to rename, delete, transfer to my comp directly from the iPod...

    Of course, I could move my ass, but I'm not a techie. My 2 cents.

    Regards,
    jdif

    --
    Let's overcome our weakness.
    1. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      don't get me wrong, I have one ... I'm not a techie
      You're repeating yourself.
    2. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      by Anonymous Coward
      ...
      You're repeating yourself.

      Apparently, you too.

      jdif

    3. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I thought the 'hip people' were all buying smack or coke (from Steve Jobs!).

      I remember when the Sony Walkman first came out. I remember that it was the particulary snotty cunts who got them first.

      Same as it ever was.

    4. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      If you want to transfer files to your computer, doesn't that mean the computer is right there anyway? Why don't you mount the iPod in your favorite file manager and use that with a real mouse, keyboard, and large monitor?

    5. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Why should such a project not be done just because there are more common users than geeks using it? It's not like he intends to sell it.

      What happens when linux gets more common users than geeks, should we stop developing it? This is by a geek and currently for the geeks, the numbers be damned.

    6. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Ummm... without an OS you can develop apps for (i.e. Linux), it would be impossible to run the type of app you are suggesting. That's why I think Linux for iPod has a lot of promise. There are a lot of nice features I've always wanted to add to the firmware. This will allow it.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    7. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by jdifool · · Score: 1
      For sure ; that's what I'm doing right now.

      But, as I'm doing it with Linux (gtkpod + sbp2), it's often awkward for some reasons : renaming files with UTF encoding (don't know why this is still not working, I must have missed a step somewhere), the fact that my IEEE1394 port is not powered, hence sucking my iPod battery in less than an hour...

      Furthermore, it is always handy to be able to delete/rename/move files from your iPod alone, since it can save you a lot of time in certain circumstances (deleting files because it's full and you need some space to put your digital pictures, for instance...)

      Regards,
      jdif

      --
      Let's overcome our weakness.
    8. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not useless - it's a nice compact battery powered piece of hardware with ADC, DAC and data storage. I bet you could do LOTS of useful things with it.

      What does a 40G data logger cost?
      What does a 40G audio recorder cost?

      Just think about it a little bit, you'll see.

    9. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by jdifool · · Score: 1
      hey hey hey,
      I'm not arguing about whether that project should keep going or not. It's a good thing in the overall, but my point was to say that a file browser would be more useful to handle the files on your pod, without all the unix filesystem hierarchy (as shown on one of the shots).

      And I don't see what's the point of your comparison. iPod has a good enough firmware for common customers, which apparently caters too to geeks. I'm just doubtful about the overall utility of this new firmware ; whereas Linux is struggling to achieve a usability level similar what has reached the Apple firmware.

      After all, it can be cool to have this new firmware to upgrade to cool things, but still I think it deserves more strategic orientations.

      Regards,
      jdif

      --
      Let's overcome our weakness.
    10. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Linux on an Ipod is basically pointless. Especially on this very device, which is what hip people [penny-arcade.com] buy in the first place (don't get me wrong, I have one). That doesn't mean people can't tweak with it, but it's not that useful, since the geek population using iPods is outnumbered by the common consumers.

      I've found the rockbox firmware for my Archos Jukebox pretty damn handy. And all it takes is to copy a file to the player. I'm sure an equivalently simple installation process will become available for 3rd party iPod firmware, and that 3rd party firmware will be just as good if not better than the original stuff in due time. Rockbox started out pretty useless I'd imagine, but I enjoy it now for its extended battery lifetime and countless extra features (though no real playlist abilities, but then, the physical UI of the archos jukebox player doesn't lend itself to easily composing those - so you have to compose .m3u files 'offline')

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    11. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by jdifool · · Score: 1
      That's a good point.

      But do we need all the Unix-like mechanisms (file browser with Unix fs) ? Or is it just something transitional ?

      Regards,
      jdif

      --
      Let's overcome our weakness.
    12. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That doesn't mean people can't tweak with it, but it's not that useful, since the geek population using iPods is outnumbered by the common consumers."

      You could apply the same argument to PCs. Should we stop programming them now?

    13. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by adamfranco · · Score: 1

      But do we need all the Unix-like mechanisms...?

      Short answer: yes

      Medium answer: yes, but they can be hidden from the user.

      Long answer:
      The "Unix-like" fs is what all of the currently availible apps for *nix understand and expect. Yes, it could be restructured, but there just isn't much benefit to anyone in doing so.

      If you look at the screenshot, the file browser is simply the last option in the UI. If the Linux-on-iPod features like mp3, ogg, etc playback get up to snuff enough for a "common user", then the unix-like nature of the firmware could be easily hidden by removing options that show it from the UI.

      At the same time, without Linux (or some other documented OS) underneath the UI, writing apps to run on the iPod is next to impossible. Apple doesn't release the nessisary information to allow us to write for the existing firmware, so someone must replace that with a system we can write for.

      --
      "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
    14. Re:Why not use these skills for something useful ? by jdifool · · Score: 1
      That's the explanation I was looking for.
      The website is not that explicit about the fact that it would be used to actually enhanced the functionalities of the iPod ; instead it is presented as some geeky work.

      Thanks, anyway, for clarifying the situation.

      Regards,
      jdif

      --
      Let's overcome our weakness.
  28. Linux on something that small? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    Hey, I don't really get why someone would ever spend so much time doing it, but if this ever really matures (it still looks pretty young) and impressive software is available for it this could be pretty cool. I think it's pretty neat that linux is that portable even though a lot of work was still put into modifying it.

    When they start putting linux in toasters, that will be useless, but this could actually evolve into something interesting as an "iPod customization pack"

    1. Re:Linux on something that small? by fpga_guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Get ready for the embedded linux revolution!

      ipodLinux is based on uClinux, which is a version of Linux that runs on processors without an MMU (Memory Management Unit).

      The research group where I work is quite involved in embedded linux work. Last year I ported the Linux kernel to an FPGA-based processor called Microblaze. I'm now doing all sorts of fun stuff involving dynamically self-modifying hardware and other bizarro stuff. All good fun.

      uClinux is running in something like 20 million devices, ranging from DVD players to netowrking routers and embedded VPN servers.

      Give it a couple of years, and the embedded linux market will make the desktop look puny. The talk on slashdot is all about the Linux desktop, but Linux is already winning the real war, embedded systems.

    2. Re:Linux on something that small? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what small thing :p. oh

      sorry

  29. Obligatory Emacs Comment by Mr.G5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good thing they make a 40 gig iPod, you'll need it to fit on Emacs! :-)

    1. Re:Obligatory Emacs Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on having the most pound-me-in-the-ass-please username on Slashdot EVAR! I thought people like you only hung out on Wolfenstein servers with "G5" in their names so everyone would know the AWESOMEA POWAA of their incredibly expensive yet still not-quite-up-to-x86 Mac!

      Oh well, you live & learn. Never overestimate nerds.

    2. Re:Obligatory Emacs Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      michaelsa@shaw.ca, is that really you? The guy with the amazing Macintosh G5? Oh, I want to have your babies!

  30. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by kai5263499 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The fact that I can run Linux on my toaster isn't going to help me make bagels in the morning.
    Yes, but if your bagles were $.99 a piece and you could enjoy independantly made bagles for much less, wouldn't you be glad to know you had the choice?
    The sooner iPods can play higher quality ogg streams without the digital restrictions management is a "good thing". And the sooner the conversion process is streamlined for the average user to be able to de-DRM-ify their iPod, the better.
    Perhaps the reason linux is ported to every hardware architechure is our undying desire to actually be able to do anything we like with the hardware we buy.

    --
    -Wes
  31. Re:Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Duh, everyone knows that Apple, like *BSD, has been dying for years. An Apple produced *BSD will only die faster...

  32. Re:Can't wait to hear the comments on this one.... by sik0fewl · · Score: 0, Troll

    I would mod you down but I used all my mod points this morning :(

    --
    I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  33. odd... by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 0

    it has more features then the original iPod firmware!

    I wonder if it has a spelling and grammar checker...

    1. Re:odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was "proffraed" by cdmrtoca itself :)

  34. An Excellent Idea, But... by Qweezle · · Score: 1

    This is just great for all of us tweakers, but for there to be a real surge in people going past what is considered normal with their iPods, there must be one or two alternative GUIs that are... say it with me now... user-friendly.

    Until then it'll be just us regular Slashdotters and geeks who will have any interest at all in this sort of thing. I still won't put it on, for the pure fact that it won't serve me well in day-to-day purposes, though it is cool.

    1. Re:An Excellent Idea, But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is an excellent idea so that you can play any mp3 files instead of being limited to itune's selection of songs

    2. Re:An Excellent Idea, But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're high on crack, aren't you?

  35. Re:Why?? by System.out.println() · · Score: 0

    Apple is dying too, of course. They make a good fit. :)

  36. Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe we people could write some new games for the Linux-on-iPod? You can't play Solitare and Breakout forever

    1. Re:Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah... everyone knows games on Linux are shit.

  37. it plays SOUND? .... wow, what's next? by iamhassi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "The Linux on iPod Project has just crossed a milestone. Currently their firmware works on all ipod models other then the new mini. Sound plays and for many people it has more features then the original iPod firmware!"

    don't even read this, just mod me flamebait, but isn't playing sound (perferably music) the entire purpose of a mp3 player? What exactly did the Linux on iPod do before? Display a cute penguin and nothing else? Forgive me if I don't consider playing sound a milestone.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:it plays SOUND? .... wow, what's next? by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Well considering he started from nothing on a closed system getting to the point where it can be used for all the normal functions the original firmware is is a milstone. It'd be like starting a web brwoser from scratch and getting it to a lynx like state with text formatting... then finally adding image support.

    2. Re:it plays SOUND? .... wow, what's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a developer milestone, not a user milestone.

  38. It may just be me... by Perdition · · Score: 5, Funny

    But if you could get that Beethoven conducted by a robot illegally downloaded onto your Beowulf cluster of Linux iPods and played it back through your sake-soaked wooden speakers as Cowboy Neal dances like an insensitive clod, I believe this site would somehow slashdot itself.

    --
    Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
    1. Re:It may just be me... by markx16 · · Score: 1

      It may just be me... (Score:3, Insightful)

      Man, the moderation is funnier than the post.

    2. Re:It may just be me... by pmjordan · · Score: 1

      Haha, you just made my day!

      phil

    3. Re:It may just be me... by sootman · · Score: 1

      Fabulous post, but you forgot to play it back through the world's largest subwoofer.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  39. It must be asked by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 1
    This being /., the topic of Ogg must come up. I would like to buy an Ipod but there's just no way I will buy any player that can't play Ogg files. I guess if they get Linux running on it well enough and they have a fast enough Ogg decoder, I should be able to play Ogg files on the Ipod? Then it would be worth it.

    --------
    WAP hosting

    1. Re:It must be asked by Lurgen · · Score: 1

      Who cares about ogg? Seriously, I haven't got a single ogg file despite having a sizable collection of MP3's and WMA'a. Nor do I know of anybody who does!

      Is it only the linux zealots who support this standard? Is it just another opportunity for the penguin-lovers to thumb their nose at whoever they feel MP3 represents? Or am I just missing some beautiful benefit of ogg...

    2. Re:It must be asked by mlk · · Score: 1

      RTFA, yes, 80% of real time thou.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:It must be asked by moxruby · · Score: 1

      I hear that many albums downloaded from emule are in .ogg format, along with MPC, WMA, APE etc.
      Seriously, the more formats it plays the more useful it is.

    4. Re:It must be asked by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Is it only the linux zealots who support this standard? Is it just another opportunity for the penguin-lovers to thumb their nose at whoever they feel MP3 represents? Or am I just missing some beautiful benefit of ogg...

      I finally sat down to determine which worked better, mp3 or ogg, and did some double-blind testing on the computer. This was a while ago, and encoders change a bit. I was using oggenc before the 1.0 release to do vorbis encoding, and lame at the same time. Both were VBR.

      It turns out that after carefully listening to the original and encoded copies, my ability to tell the difference between the .ogg and uncompressed audio topped out significantly higher than .mp3, at least on the clip I was listening to.

      I am using all .ogg today, however. Why? Because even though I can hear vorbis artifacts more clearly than mp3 artifacts, they don't sound *awful*, as mp3 ones do. I mostly notice vorbis modifying the sound of drum beats. It's hard to describe, and doesn't seem to make them sound worse -- they just sound slightly different, but still like drums. mp3 squashes cymbals and similar-sounding audio into a runny, mushy mess of sound, and makes music generally sound slightly less "atmospheric". The artifacts are unpleasant to hear.

      There is also one pragmatic use for ogg if you're a P2P downloader -- all vorbis files that you're going to find on P2P networks are going to be VBR, whereas many MP3s are CBR. VBR is almost always a tremendous win over CBR for non-streaming listening, and should absolutely always be used.

      There are a few other issues. MP3 encoding is covered by patents. Ogg encoding is not. (There was some noise at one point about mp3 decoding as well, but I think that blew over.) Fraunhoffer is working to try to add more of their patents into the standard to be able to make money off of it, with stuff like MP3+. Ogg and vorbis are produced by a group that is simply in it to make the best thing they can.

      I think few people have any attachment to mp3 other than the fact that it's in wide use and it's effectively DRMless. I haven't seen many people using wma.

      Given the opportunity, I'd probably prefer to use FLAC on my computer, and if I had a portable player, ogg vorbis on it.

    5. Re:It must be asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just no way I will buy any player that can't play Ogg files

      I guess that makes you some kind of fool then. Oh well!

    6. Re:It must be asked by Hast · · Score: 1

      I think another big thing about Ogg is the possibility of bit-shaving. That way you can dynamically lower the bitrate of a file without reencoding it. If you use portable players (think USB thumb drives) that can be a big thing. Unfortunately no portable players I know of support Ogg, so it's kind of moot. And AFAIK bit-shaving is still not quite there, although the latest release had more support for it.

      Still, if you add something like that then the point of Ogg might just become apparent to "the rest of the world". Though that doesn't really matter to me. As long as it's more useful for me then that's enough.

    7. Re:It must be asked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just the opposite of me. I've got 9G of Vorbis audio but less than 2G of MP3s, and no WMAs.

      I can't speak for others but I use Vorbis because it sounds better than MP3 for the same (or less!) bitrate. (I was planning on setting up Icecast and streaming my muisc over 802.11b so I could pick it up anywhere in the house. I got a very low-power stereo FM transmitter and hooked it up to my soundcard instead.)

      Oh, and all my 9G of Vorbis files are ripped from my CD collection. All legal.

  40. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by dpete4552 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not necessarily about being zealious or anything like that. It's just a hobby project for now. Some Linux coders got to gether and thought it might be fun to do just for the hell of it. Just something to tinker with. Then again that's how Linux itself started out so who knows. I think it really does have some potential once it matures a little.

    --
    http://www.archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares
  41. Misdirection... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...while this is certainly a technical achievement, is it a useful one? Yeah, who am I to be the arbiter of that, but my mind is boggling.
    My microwave oven doesn't run linux yet; can someone get hacking on that?
    Seriously, with all of the real projects that need coders, this falls way off the map into the "There be Dragons" category.

    "Linux: We don't have a real UI yet, but it doesn't matter because your garage door opener doesn't need it."
    [shakes head sadly]

    1. Re:Misdirection... by moxruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, with all of the real projects that need coders, this falls way off the map into the "There be Dragons" category.

      You're right. Coders have an obligation to provide their skills free of charge to a project that "needs" it, rather than one they enjoy working on...

    2. Re:Misdirection... by mlk · · Score: 2

      (bye bye Karma)
      Who the fuck are you to choose what people spend their time on?

      You want a good UI, write one.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:Misdirection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pinko commie trash, thinking that you should be able to dictate what projects a person works on.

      These damn godless communists are going to destroy the world, I tell you what.

    4. Re:Misdirection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay for teenage sarcasm!

  42. Re:Can't wait to hear the comments on this one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for letting us know!

  43. -1 pedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "then" != "than"

    This doesn't seem complex enough to be a confusing thing, but many seem to get it wrong.

    1. Re:-1 pedantic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only you knew how many. Oh, the years, the faces, the eternal, soul-wrenching pain. But I know, I know the ugly truth. And let me tell you, it's hideous. More hideous than anything...

      Shit! It finally got me. I've been infected! RUN, while there's still time left for you. Run before it's too late...

    2. Re:-1 pedantic by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

      Hey man, no need to loose your cool.

  44. Its all about aesthetics by gotr00t · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Though the Rio Karma has impressive specs for a lower price than the Apple iPod, it still sells far less than the iPod. The reason for this is all about aesthetics. I showed some people the iPod and the Karma at an electronics store, and all of them said that the iPod looked more attractive. Though many websites claim the Karma has a smaller footprint, they fail to point out that, like one person said, it was "thicker than a hockey puck."

    I guess Jobs was right in saying that Apple's competetiors don't "get it." The iPod Mini, for example, may seem like an absurdity to us /.ers because of its high price, low capacity, and low feature set. However, it was an instant bestseller, with so many preorders and subsequent purchases that supplies were exhausted in a matter of weeks. The truth is, the average person thinks differently from the average /.er.

    1. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Endive4Ever · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So you're saying that sales volume defines the merit of a product?

      Weeelll, then. I hope you're enjoying your WalMart Windows box....

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Its all about aesthetics by ZeroLogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a typical slashdot type, hell, programming pays my bills, but i held out on buying an iPod UNTIL the mini came out.

      Why? Because I walk everywhere I go, and the mini is small enough that it fits (when clipped into my jean pocket) above my pager and cell phone. Plus, it's just damn cool. And 4 days of music is more than i need on me at any one time.

    3. Re:Its all about aesthetics by a+whoabot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's cause the iPod is just a sign for the average person to consume. They have it and for them it signifies: "Hey, look I'm hip." Even the songs they put on, just more signs. "Oh yeah, the Darkness, they rock. They're like Zeppelin."

      The iPod, like most things, is not priced based on it's use or exchange value, just it's sign exchange value.

      Look at the ads for the iPod. They're just a bunch of silhouettes of girls and guys with hip hair cuts holding their iPods over a background of nouveau-retro-colored designs. "Look how 'cool' our ad is! Don't you want to be cool?", is what it says. It's not a list of specs or prices. Or look at their ad-type deals with Value Village and its retro, "flower power" image. "It's cool to shop at Value Village. It's, like, retro, and lo-fi!" Just another sign. Watch the yuppies when someone says "nice shirt" to them, they're quick to jump in, "I got it at Value Village! It was used!" "Used" isn't good because it allows more practical pricing(if you look at Value Village pricing, it's still ridiculously high -- and you don't have to buy any clothes actually, except for perhaps socks and underwears, you can make by fine just with what you can get for free or find or what you already have), it's good because it's "cool": it has a high sign exchange value.

      Jobs displays his shallow yuppiness flagrantly when he says people don't "get it" about the Apple "hipness". Maybe some don't. But some do, but they also "get" a little more: that's it's just meaningless signs and false worth. So the ones who may not "get it", are not missing anything: what they don't "get" is absolutely nosense, and that's alright.

    4. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Basehart · · Score: 4, Funny

      Man, you just don't get it!

    5. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      Advertising is all about telling people that your product is [hip|cool|bling|needed|willgetyoulaid]. Why should the iPod be any different?

    6. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Drakonian · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Nice rant. But gimme a break. The iPod is extremely valuable. I think it's the coolest thing I've ever owned. Despite paying a lot of money for my 1st gen 5 GB iPod, it's well worth every penny. I use it all the time. It works perfectly. It is an absolute delight to use. It honestly improves my quality of life. Listening on the train, listening while walking home, listening while studying, etc.

      Oh, and even Joe Satriani digs that Darkness tune.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    7. Re:Its all about aesthetics by b17bmbr · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm a typical slashdot type, hell, programming pays my bills

      if programming actually pays your bills, you're not a typical /. type.

      (ducks)

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    8. Re:Its all about aesthetics by killjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You left out the biggest one of all.

      Harley Davidson.

      The CEO of harley davidson once said "we are not a motorcycle company, we are a fashion company". People don't buy harleys because they want a good bike they get one because they think it makes them cool and rebellious. This despite the fact 99% of harley owners are doctors, lawyers, assorted actors and politicians. What the heck put on a harley shirt, harley leathers, harley helmet, get on your harley and go to sturgis and hang out with all the other people wearing the exact same clothing and riding the same bikes to prove you are different and cool.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    9. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the truth is it is an apple. simply put, if it has a half bitten apple logo on it, it will sell.

      iCrud would be the end all if it came from apple. roooting for the underdog is getting a bit old.

    10. Re:Its all about aesthetics by a+whoabot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not saying that it cannot be truly valuable to anyone. You seem to have use for it, that's good for you. I will give you, or anyone, "a break", for sure for sure. You need not reply if you feel authentic, I can't judge you from here. If you have no regard for the "signs" I describe, then you're obviously on the good side of my rant. And all of us are inauthentic to some extent of course: I, myself, don't feel like some sort symbolically-exuding philosopher-poet in that aspect, far from it, this is just kind of an area of interest for me, tis all.

      I've heard some Satch(at least, I have Live in San Fran buried somewhere, I think I've heard more), but he's hardly a true artist is the musical sense. He's more a guitar acrobat. Perhaps he makes an art out of his acrobatics(or some music-acobatic hybrid), but I wouldn't say he makes much of an art out the music itself. There's a world of difference in relation to the art of the actual music between someone like Mr. Satriani and, say, Pere Ubu. I would stress the difference between musicianship and musicality. And I've never heard the Darkness, actually.

    11. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and don't forget your Harley Davidson limited edition fountain pen, and your Harley Davidson/Franklin Mint limited edition leather-clad biker doll!

      Oh SO rebellious!

    12. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      So you're saying that sales volume defines the merit of a product?

      In a market economy, yes. Sales volume (assuming the product is not being sold at a loss) is an excellent indicator of success for the producing company, rather than any particular technical merit. How many examples of technically excellent yet market-ignored technologies would you like? Alternatively, how many examples of technically inferior yet market dominating products would you like?

      Products are developed by corporations to make profit. If a product sells a lot and makes money, then this product has merit, regardless of how good or bad it is technically. That's the real world...and the inhabitants of Slashdot are often far from it.

    13. Re:Its all about aesthetics by a+whoabot · · Score: 0

      I guess it shouldn't be any diffferent: makes them money, gets them what they want, etc. But it's still a strange thing, and I don't care for it. And beleive me, what I don't care for goes far beyond just iPod advertising and iPod sign-exchange. And to note: I see non-(telling people that your product is [hip|cool|bling|needed|willgetyoulaid])-based ads all the time. Example: most classifieds. They describe the item and list a price. It's still an ad. It doesn't involve any sign-fetishism though.

    14. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's cause the iPod is just a sign for the average person to consume. They have it and for them it signifies: "Hey, look I'm hip." Even the songs they put on, just more signs. "Oh yeah, the Darkness, they rock. They're like Zeppelin." The iPod, like most things, is not priced based on it's use or exchange value, just it's sign exchange value. Look at the ads for the iPod. They're just a bunch of silhouettes of girls and guys with hip hair cuts holding their iPods over a background of nouveau-retro-colored designs. "Look how 'cool' our ad is! Don't you want to be cool?", is what it says. It's not a list of specs or prices. Or look at their ad-type deals with Value Village and its retro, "flower power" image. "It's cool to shop at Value Village. It's, like, retro, and lo-fi!" Just another sign. Watch the yuppies when someone says "nice shirt" to them, they're quick to jump in, "I got it at Value Village! It was used!" "Used" isn't good because it allows more practical pricing(if you look at Value Village pricing, it's still ridiculously high -- and you don't have to buy any clothes actually, except for perhaps socks and underwears, you can make by fine just with what you can get for free or find or what you already have), it's good because it's "cool": it has a high sign exchange value. Jobs displays his shallow yuppiness flagrantly when he says people don't "get it" about the Apple "hipness". Maybe some don't. But some do, but they also "get" a little more: that's it's just meaningless signs and false worth. So the ones who may not "get it", are not missing anything: what they don't "get" is absolutely nosense, and that's alright.

      Pissed off you bought a Rio, huh?

    15. Re:Its all about aesthetics by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Heh...

      If I were to ever buy a Harley, it would be purely because of the sound.

      Nothing turns on girls like the roar of a classic Harley engine :P

      --
      Eat the rich.
    16. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the truth is it is an apple. simply put, if it has a half bitten apple logo on it, it will sell

      Some of the time, yes. But look at the new iMac. Sales have never been anything near what they were like with the old see-through plastic iMac. The new iMac, while possibly more stylish (depending on your tastes) is just too expensive and underpowered for many people, and sales have been disappointing. I can honestly say I've never seen a 2nd-gen iMac outside an Apple Store...but I see plenty of PowerBooks, iBooks, PowerMacs and eMacs about the place. Not everything Apple does is blindly revered by consumers (or even Mac zealots).

    17. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Monkelectric · · Score: 1, Troll
      I love you man. I have said that *1000* times and been moded a troll every last time. Apple can only do the things Apple does because THEY ARE APPLE. In a post where I was modded a troll, I said "Only Nixon can go to China" and "Only Apple can sell consumer electronics at 135% of market value."

      People who buy Apples are the same irrational fanboys that line up to see LOTR a week early, soupe up their hondas with R-Type stickers, or dragon ball z fans. Except, Apple fanboys are more intelligent and they know it. , They consider themselves to be the enlightened ones, the elite, the vanguard. But we know :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    18. Re:Its all about aesthetics by killjoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I forgot to mention the sound. It's the old "I am rebellius because I am rude" attitude.

      I figure these guys have to be all polite and ass kissing at work. On the weekends they get to shit on all the people in their neighborhood and that makes them feel better.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    19. Re:Its all about aesthetics by matticus · · Score: 1

      I work for a Mac-based scientific institute, and have the new iMac on my desk. It's my secondary computer. We have maybe 100 in the building. It's actually a very nice machine. I would have never touched the old iMac, but this one is rather nice for real work. Small footprint, dvd-burner, tft. I still wouldn't buy one for home, but that's because I'm not really a mac guy.

    20. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up +1 more worthy than you.

    21. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you use desktop linux at home, you ARE the definition of fanboy.

      Try and understand - it's not difficult. The iPod sells well because people are prepared to spend $50 more on something that is well designed and pleasant to use than a POS creative player that occupies 50% more space.

      But don't let me burst your 'I know better because I don't own a Mac or an iPod' bubble.

    22. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Espen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As long as Apple sells iPods as quickly as they are produced their price IS the market value (or below).

    23. Re:Its all about aesthetics by rishistar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Only Apple can sell consumer electronics at 135% of market value."

      But 'brand' and 'aesthetics' are part of what the market value is. Otherwise you'd be paying 10 bucks for Nike trainers, and be getting free bottles of Chanel thrown in for good measure.

      I'm not a fan of Apple and have no intention of buying any of their imac/powermac stuff on the basis that it is more expensive - so yeah on the home computer range they may well have messed up on price. Mac owners will no doubt argue - better components and OS which is fair enough. Maybe it is better...its just not better enough for me to spend and extra 500 pounds to get one.

      In a capitalist system 'market value' is what people will pay for the product - not what the cost of components + advertising/sales stuff + bit of profit is. So with the iPod and iPod mini they may have actually got the market value bang on the nose. Personally I don't like the all white iPod myself, but am sorely tempted by the minis.

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    24. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm enjoying my WalMart Linux box, actually.

    25. Re:Its all about aesthetics by 1010011010 · · Score: 1


      So you're what, a philosophy major?

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    26. Re:Its all about aesthetics by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

      People don't buy harleys because they want a good bike they get one because they think it makes them cool and rebellious.

      Fuck that belt-driven piece of shit. So much power loss, and it makes the single part that connects the engine to the drive wheel a regular maintenance replacement. Give me anything else, a chain, (preferably) a shaft, but not that belt. Harley owners are frequently proud of that belt. Can't figure out why, it's the single most annoying point of failure on those bikes.

      I can make any bike sound like a Harley, but I don't want *noise*. I want comfort and weight on my bike. I want to be able to cruise at 70 without having to bend over and put my forehead on the handle bars, and I don't want to be driven deaf by the exhaust noise to do it. Yeah, yeah, loud pipes save lives and all. Riding smart will do more for you than any pipe noise.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    27. Re:Its all about aesthetics by pyite · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just a question... have you met many bikers? Most of them are some of the nicest people I've ever met and have the utmost respect for life and property. Way to be prejudiced to a large lot based on the actions of a few. Also, typically on the roads, "real" bikers tend to be very conservative in their driving as opposed to the ricers who feel the need to weave between traffic at 100mph+.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    28. Re:Its all about aesthetics by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Two points:

      No, you can't make any bike sound like a Harley, unless you don't know what the Harley sound is. A big chunk of that sound is from the angle seperating the clinders, and the sound is copyrighted. You are breaking teh law if you ever sell that bike that you made to "sound like a harley", which probaly just means "loud" to the non-mechanic's ears (even a quiet Harley sounds like a Harley).

      Regarding the "belt-drive" - well, if you like a harsh ride on your "comfy cruiser" then sure, go with a chain or shaft-based final drive. If you're concerned about making your cruiser more comfortable, *quieter*, or otherwise more livable, stick with Harley's lifetime warranteed carbon-fiber belt-based final drive. Then, go get a service manual and learn how to adjust it properly. I've got several friends who are Harley riders (and Harley mechanics, in some cases). They ride a *lot*. The final drive gives no problems.

      Take a physics course some day. Note that the belt doesn't stretch and get hot, nor does it make any noise. Where's the "energy loss"? Now look at all of the pivot points in a chain. Then listen to the noise. *That* is power loss - power being converted to heat and noise. I don't know how many chains I've broken over the years on various chain-driven devices (several), but I've never broken a Harley drive belt...

      Eh, good troll, though. Most Slashdot readers have no mechanical ability whatsoever. :p

    29. Re:Its all about aesthetics by rethin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cloudmaster,

      You're right on all those technical points but...

      I'm sorry to say that the Harley Davidson company doesnot hold a copyright on the sound. They did try to Trademark it back in the 90's but gave up on that for two reasons.
      1. its pretty much impossible to trademark a sound
      2. The metric cruisers didn't really try to copy the sound (they produced engines than were in tune) and so lost the commercial incentive to protect the "sound".

      But right on abou the belt :-)

      Rethin

    30. Re:Its all about aesthetics by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1
      Listening on the train, listening while walking home, listening while studying, etc.

      Whoopee, I had a walkman that did pretty much all of that for about 1/10th the cost 10 years ago. My iRiver ifp390t does it for 1/2 the cost (also 1/2 the size and 2x battery life). The Rio Karma does it for 3/4s the cost.

      So what is your iPod giving you over the others apart from cool factor and a bigger hole in your wallet?

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    31. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My iPod gives me an alarm clock, the ability to view text files, autosyncing with my address book and iCal, auto-syncing and charging over Firewire (or IEEE 1394 for those who don't get it), an alarm clock, a way to steal software from Macs at CompUSA, and a bootable backup drive in event of emergencies.

      And all without having to switch batteries or analog tapes.

      If cost was all anyone cared about, Mercedes would be out of business.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    32. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Laser+Lou · · Score: 1
      That's cause the iPod is just a sign for the average person to consume. They have it and for them it signifies: "Hey, look I'm hip."

      I agree that much of the iPod's value is in it being a sign. However, its not all in that. Its portability, durability, aesthetics, and its seamless integration with iTunes count for something. It may not be a bargain, but it is still useful.

      --
      No data, no cry
    33. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more camps than the loud and the stupid camps. True that most fall in these 2 categories though.

      Go to a Harley bike rally once and you'll see why "loud" is norm... basically "Look at me, look at me".

      The morons that ride on one wheel going down the interstate are just as self-centered.

      Both are comparable to children who need more attention.

    34. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The CEO of harley davidson once said "we are not a motorcycle company, we are a fashion company". People don't buy harleys because they want a good bike they get one because they think it makes them cool and rebellious.

      Speaking as a biker, riding a Harley is a unique experience.
      Its powerfull, its loud, it shakes the earth.

      And people get out of your damn way.
      Now, if you don't ride, you can't understand the value of that, but normal bikes are ignored by cars, they change lanes to a lane where you are, they don't give you the right of way, etc.
      On a Harley, the rumbling makes them react as though you were an 18 wheeler or something.

      And as for the iPod, everything about coolness is true, BUT its also the best mp3 player there is. The interface is excellent, it holds a shitload of music, and the synching with iTunes makes it a breeze to manage.

      So sometimes something is cool because it deserves to be cool. Other times its simply marketing hype. But the iPod and Harley deserve their status.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    35. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      What they don't get is that things like aesthetic appeal and simplicity are important to people, while things like Ogg Vorbis support simply are not important to anyone outside of Slashdot, where utility is the only important thing. I swear, some 2-bit company could release a 6 inch-wide, 2-pound digital music player, but as long as it supports Ogg Vorbis and FLAC, Slashdot will laud it as another "iPod Killer."

      Here's what the competitors really don't get. People don't give a shit about music formats. They want simplicity. They want their music downloads to work on the iPod, and they do. MP3 is by far the most popular format, still, and most of the music people are buying is in protected AAC format, which the iPod supports. So people are "shallow" for paying a little extra for the product that is the simplest to use, gives them everything they want and all with a touch of style? That's absurd. Get off your geek pedestal and please come back to reality.

    36. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 1

      People who buy Apples are the same irrational fanboys

      Have you ever noticed, during an average, run-of-the-mill barfight over the "Chevy vs. Ford" issue, that there are no BMW owners present?


      --
      --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    37. Re:Its all about aesthetics by chromaphobic · · Score: 1

      So what is your iPod giving you over the others apart from cool factor and a bigger hole in your wallet?

      While the question wasn't directed at me, I can tell you what my iPod gives me over the two mentioned.

      I use the iPod to have my entire music library with me at all times, so no matter what I'm in the mood for at any given moment I have it with me.

      Currently that amounts to about 22GB, far more than the iRiver's measly 256MB and even more than the Karma's 20GB. Heck, by the end of the year (as I continue to rip old CD's that I haven't gotten around to, along with new purchases) I'll probably have maxed out my 30GB iPod and will have to move up to a 40GB model!

      Oh yeah, neither mention Mac support either. So my iPod gives me that as well. :)

      If there were a large-storage Mac-compatible player besides the iPod, I might consider it. Until then I'll stick with the iPod, fashion or hipness be damned.

    38. Re:Its all about aesthetics by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Powerful? You and I must have ridden a different harley. That twist grip on the right handlebar isn't a throttle my friend... it's a volume control.

    39. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you try the new Honda Valkyrie? That flat 6 cylinder will give some thinking to Harley owners about what a powerful cruiser is.

    40. Re:Its all about aesthetics by spare.dave · · Score: 1

      Jesus man, you're right. After reading this post I just had to act.

      I went straight back to the store to return my iPod.
      On the way I stopped off at a trade show/anime convention and replaced my whole wardrobe with t-shirts picturing corporate logo's and naked cartoon girls. I also picked up an old c64 case and some other parts to mod into my own homebrew ogg player (it's running a custom linux dist).

      All of my GAP clothes are now in a large bonfire, so I'm naked as I type this.

      Do i "get it" now?

    41. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A surefire 5 words to get a +5 post: You're new here aren't you?
      Seven words, to be pedantic. You're is a contraction of You and Are, and Aren't is a contraction of Are and Not, so that adds two words right there.

      Interestingly you can reduce it to four words quite easily. "New here, are you?"

    42. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Powerful? You and I must have ridden a different harley.

      1100cc as opposed to my usual 200cc yamaha.
      Noticeable difference ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    43. Re:Its all about aesthetics by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Did you have access to your entire music library when you carried your Walkman around? Or did you have to make your decisions about what to listen to several hours before you actually did the listening?

      Walkmans, like those 128Mb MP3 players, lack practicality. People used them because, for the most part, there was nothing better at the time. The iPod and its competitors are really the first viable portable music solutions, and there's still a long way to go. Hopefully 3G and the always-on computer will make a major difference too.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    44. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe most harleys are around 1400cc. My cbr600 will blow a harley away. My old cbr250 used to give one a run for it's money. I hired one on my honeymoon. I was extremely surprised at how fast they *don't* accelerate, stop and turn.

    45. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      I really enjoy The Darkness. I don't think they are anything like Zeppelin...Many of their lyrics make even less sense than Zeppelins.

      What they really remind me of is 80's hair metal and maybe a little bit of Queen. I own their cd 'Permission to Land', all of the songs but one or two really kick ass. They also seem to have a sense of humor.

    46. Re:Its all about aesthetics by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Go to a Harley bike rally once and you'll see why "loud" is norm... basically "Look at me, look at me".
      While this is true, it's also true that you really do want people to look at you when you're balancing on two weeks in rush hour traffic, and are a fraction of the size of even the smallest non-two-wheeled vehicle.

      I don't blame motorcyclists for wanting to give other motorists as much notice as they can that they're around.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    47. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the truth is it is an apple. simply put, if it has a half bitten apple logo on it, it will sell.
      Absolutely. That's why Apple has a near 50% market share of the personal computing market, right?

      (Posted AC because you did)

    48. Re:Its all about aesthetics by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Its all about aesthetics... Not always.
      For me personally, the only time I use an MP3 player is when I go out for a run.

      For me portability is key. The iPod and most mp3 players are either too heavy or not portable enough (i.e they don't attach to your body in a way that is conducive (sp?) for running or in the case of the iPod way too expensive for the abuse I put an mp3 player through.

      Plus there is absolutely no chance that I would need 20G of music on a run. I don't run that long!!

      For people who like to have background music I can understand why they like the iPod and the big storage kind of mp3 players. I admit it is pretty and has a really nice interface.

    49. Re:Its all about aesthetics by John+Whitley · · Score: 1

      I have said that *1000* times and been moded a troll every last time

      I don't know about the other times, but you're a troll now. The earlier poster described a situation in which a company has transitioned beyond the early adopter phase, and is selling products based on what he called "signs". I.e. Apple has transitioned to using the marketing tactics of a mature industry, not an early adopter industry. You, however go on to make inflammatory and content-free statements like "People who buy Apples are the same irrational fanboys [deletia]." Go log off, troll.

      Folks looking for great information on market transitions and computing w/o the rant and religion should go read the first several chapters of Don Norman's "The Invisible Computer". You'll get some fascinating history of market evolutions, and analysis of the state of computing w.r.t. how earlier markets evolved from early adopter phases into maturity.

    50. Re:Its all about aesthetics by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1

      Woah man, i drive a 2001 Buick Regal GS and a 1972 Buick Skylark with a vintage '70 Buick 455 producing 410hp and 515ft/lbs of torque.. i don't watch dargonball z, i do like lord of the rings, but i have read the books, i like unix, i also use windows and admit it, though i don't use IE except on new installs to download the latest mozilla or opera.i don't like rice, i like muscle cars... i like the ipod because it's useful and i like the iTMS and iTunes is one of the best audio players i have ever used. winamp is nice and all but geeze, iTunes organizes things so well.. the ipod was a natural choice for this.. don't knock it till you try it, and dammit, don't stereotype everyone

    51. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... the mini is small enough that it fits (when clipped into my jean pocket) above my pager and cell phone.

      Batman called. he wants his belt back.

    52. Re:Its all about aesthetics by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Sure, some people like to be loud to try and be rebellious.

      I just happen to like the sound. It's a nice sound. It's a beautiful sound (well, to me it is!).

      There are few things in this world which will put a big fat grin of sheer bliss on my face, and the sound of a Harley is one of them.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    53. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stick it up your ass you self protentious ass-hole. There is NOTHING unique about harleys. They are loud overpriced bikes is all. People dont get out of your way any more than they do the Japanese bikes. Yes, I do ride one and they are a HELL OF A LOT LOUDER than a harley. The rumbling that you think sounds like an 18 wheeler doesnt, it just sounds like a loud anoying motorcycle. You should be more considerate of othe people. Your as low as those who play their stereos forcing us to listen to them. Whatever mental problem it is you have that your motorcycle seems to fill, you should go see a psyciatrist about it. Dont make us listen to your piece of crap corporate bought patriosm.

    54. Re:Its all about aesthetics by edbarrett · · Score: 1
      There's a world of difference in relation to the art of the actual music between someone like Mr. Satriani and, say, Pere Ubu.

      Troll!

      Let's translate:

      $YOUR_SIGN is mass market bullshit. $MY_SIGN, is actually cool. The fact you can't see that is your loss.

    55. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Well, I am typing this on a Dell Optiplex that I paid 80 cents for. (average price. It was with 70 PII and PIII boxes bought in two skid lots for $40)

      I can't imagine paying more than $15 for a computer anymore. WalMart is ripping us off.

      --
      ---
    56. Re:Its all about aesthetics by themoebius · · Score: 1

      Dude you can't go around saying this stuff sucks because it's hip. If you do that, you are in fact being hip yourself because it's cool to do whats cool but not "cool yet" The only way to get out of this cycle of doing something because it's the current fad is to ignore it and judge purely on what you like instead of whats hip. But that should go without saying.

    57. Re:Its all about aesthetics by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      No, no, no.

      Satriani's good at the guitar. That's his thing. I can't really comment on that too much. I don't much about that. Pere Ubu is good with music itself. That's a thing I'm in to. And I will comment of that.

      Maybe, Satriani, overall, has more artistic quality than Pere Ubu. But his art would certainly lie in the actually technicals of playing the guitar. I'm not really familiar with that. No, troll.

    58. Re:Its all about aesthetics by a+whoabot · · Score: 1
      Okay. I don't doubt that it can have a use value. Really what I'm saying is:

      1) It's priced based on it's sign-exchange value...

      2) ...because many(most?) people are mainly(totally?) interested in it as a sign.

      It's like guys who buy Hummers and never leave the metro area. They didn't buy utility. They bought a sign of utility, or of something else(perhaps wealth?) But that's all that matters to them. That's definitely shallowness. When the sign of something is more important than the something.

      Or, it's as those pants that people wear nowadays(a lot of the iPod owners like to have these pants too). You know, the ones with the pre-fading or pre-made tears. It's just another "hip" thing. It's some sort of obscure sign of "use", or "life", or perhaps the "Salvation Army look". "Look at the fading in my pants! I must have owned these for a long time! And I'm too hip to care that my pants are torn! Yeah!" And I've seen the prices for (some) of those pants. $40-$100. What, could possibly be the reason for buying(not owning) those pants for yourself apart from for obtaining it's sign value? Like I could imagine some completely unlikely fringe reasons(someone said they'd kill if you didn't get them, or something else bizarre). Anyway, you must agree, most people buy those pants for their "hipness". So, as a deliberation on the possibility of people buying the iPod as a sign: what's the stretch from buying pants at 100 times their use-exchange value just to obtain it's sign-exchange value to buying an iPod for it's sign-exchange value(with whatever amount of disregard for it's markup in relation to use, definitely not 100x, if any). I wouldn't say any stretch at all.

      "So people are "shallow" for paying a little extra for the product that is the simplest to use, gives them everything they want and all with a touch of style?"

      When you say that, it seems as if you completely miss my point. I think I clarified a bit more, but I'll put in a bit more here.

      Okay, if they paid for something that gives them the utility they want at a price reasonable for them: great. That's not the subject of my "rant"; and I did not call someone who would do that shallow. There's a difference between buying something for utility and buying something as a sign. I'm critical, in this case, only, on the latter, of course.

    59. Re:Its all about aesthetics by killjoe · · Score: 0, Troll

      I am a biker. I just don't ride a harley. Mainly because I don't ever want to be associated with harley riders. Also because I don't have any tatoos, have a wardrobe that is not dominated by some corporation's logo, and don't have any racist attitudes about the japanese.

      If they were really nice people they would not get the loudest bike on the market and ride it when people are settled in for the night.

      There is a reason why harleys are loud. People who buy harleys want the loudest most obnoxious bike on the market because they believe it makes them macho and impresses the girls (as the parent poster stated). For some reason the obnoxiously loud sound a harley makes is comforting to them and they don't give a fuck about anybody else who might be near.

      Compare your typical BMW rider to your typical harley rider and see which one is polite and nice. Both bikes cost about the same and yet a completely different class of people ride them.

      Why do you think that is?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    60. Re:Its all about aesthetics by killjoe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Your post reinforces what I was saying. Notice you said nothing about your bikes performance, reliability, cornering ability, anti-lock brakes, comfort, carrying capacity, protection from the elements, or any other thing that has to do with riding.

      you like the bike because it's loud and makes you feel like you got a big dick. Makes you feel like you can shake the earth and makes motorists "respect" you.

      Like I said, harleys are fashion accesories not bikes. I bet you have a closet full of harley shirts and leathers too am I right?

      BTW in no way, shape, or form are harleys cool. They are technologically obsolete, bad handling, heavy as all hell, slow and overpriced. Any BMW will run rings around it, any japanese bike will be more comfortable, perform better, get better milage and cost less and be more fun to ride.

      Harleys are for aging hipster wannabe professionals going through a mid life crisis or divorce.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    61. Re:Its all about aesthetics by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I think you have confused displacement with power. It's all a matter of power to weight ratios.

      I bet any kawasaki 250 ninja could blow your harley away both in the quarter mile and on any track.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    62. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still haven't gotten a girl down to your basement love den, have you? Here's a hint: rabid fear of style doesn't help.

    63. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Darkness rawks, you tubby troll!

    64. Re:Its all about aesthetics by nathanh · · Score: 1
      I guess Jobs was right in saying that Apple's competetiors don't "get it." The iPod Mini, for example, may seem like an absurdity to us /.ers because of its high price, low capacity, and low feature set.

      The mini doesn't seem absurd to me. 4GB is more space than I want. The colours look cool. The smaller form factor is a bonus.

    65. Re:Its all about aesthetics by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Maybe, Satriani, overall, has more artistic quality than Pere Ubu. But his art would certainly lie in the actually technicals of playing the guitar. I'm not really familiar with that. No, troll.

      I'm a huge fan of Satriani and his artistic qualities are not limited to his technical ability. Flying in a Blue Dream is a beautiful song, easily on par with anything from John Williams (Sky). Strange Beautiful Music shows that Satriani knows more about music than just playing the guitar; he deftly branched out into percussive and progressive beats. Sure, Satriani has oodles of technical ability, so his songs demonstrate that, but I wouldn't listen to his music if all he could do was play the guitar very well. His song-writing ability makes his music enjoyable. Isn't that the most important artistic ability of them all?

    66. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A factory Harley sounds just like any motorcycle: fairly quiet, very boring. They have to be this way to pass noise regulations.

      The loud Harleys you hear are those with after-market pipes on them. If you're after a bike for the sound, buy a Ducati.

    67. Re:Its all about aesthetics by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm familiar with the noise regulations, and the large market for the louder more 'real' pipes. They bring out the sound I like ;)

      Most bikes sound rather good with good after-market pipes. One of my friends has a Suzuki Marauder which sound almost like a Harley, and it's much, much cheaper.

      But there is still no sound comparable to the sound of a good old Harley engine going from "chuck-chuck-chuck" to an ear-splitting explosion of a roar.

      Yes, you could probably call me a sound fetichist. I'm the kinda guy who likes standing outside in a thunderstorm just to really hear the thunder :)

      --
      Eat the rich.
    68. Re:Its all about aesthetics by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I thought I saw some TV special a few years back that claimed HD had patented/copyrighted/trademarked /something-ed the sound. Huh. Now I'm gonna have to waste the whole afternoon looking for another source of information either verifying you or myself. Great. :)

    69. Re:Its all about aesthetics by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I'll be darned. The application was abandoned Sept. 22, 2000, over 6 years after the initial filing date.

      http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial &e ntry=74485223

      At least that didn't actually take the whole afternoon to find. :)

    70. Re:Its all about aesthetics by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      I have said that *1000* times and been moded a troll every last time. ...and this time, too, just for good measure.

      Because you're still a troll. How you say something is at least as important as what you have to say.

      p

    71. Re:Its all about aesthetics by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      you said nothing [...] that has to do with riding.
      you like the bike because it's loud and makes you feel like you got a big dick. Makes you feel like you can shake the earth and makes motorists "respect" you.


      They make motorists not blindly ram me with their cars.
      That has a LOT to do with riding.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    72. Re:Its all about aesthetics by jasonjacks0n · · Score: 1
      The iPod, like most things, is not priced based on it's use or exchange value, just it's sign exchange value. [...] So the ones who may not "get it", are not missing anything: what they don't "get" is absolutely nosense, and that's alright.

      I agree with you, but I think you're missing an important point: there really are social benefits to using or possessing objects with a high sign value, even if they have no other good points.

      Just as an example: try introducing yourself in a nightclub wearing, say, Polo, and then try again wearing, say, D&G or Diesel. You'll have more success the second time. Is it because the clothing is better made? Or even because it costs more? Nope. (Diesel is only a bit more expensive than Polo anyway.)

      It's because you're in effect saying "I believe in a certain set of values, a certain aesthetic". It doesn't particularly matter what that aesthetic is; it's all about shared values.

      Being willing to expend the time, effort and/or money to "seem" cool is to "be" cool, to most people.

      Ok, so -- as you point out -- to some people, including us "engineer types", this is nonsense. And at some level almost everybody actually understands this. But it's worth it to most people to uphold the system of shared deception or pretension, because they can benefit from it.

      See? Diesel clothing has "cool" value because *other people are willing to pretend it does*.

      In other crowds it's different signifiers, but with the same result. Here it might be having installed Gentoo from stage 1, say..

      My point, if I have one, is that the whole charade is shallow, I suppose, but in a different way than most people think..

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  45. Why the arguement of usefulness . . . by sleekus_geekus · · Score: 1

    After reading the forums on New Tool Cracks Apple's FairPlay DRM I thought the usefulness of linux on an ipod would be pretty useful given some of the limitations the ipod has regarding fileformats etc...

    --
    C3PO - We seem to be made to suffer. It's our lot in life.
  46. Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by smilinggoat · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have had 2 of the lovely little Karmas die on me. RMA'ed the first one after an HD failure only to have it replaced almost a month later by one that skips while playing most of my songs and has repeatedly required formatting just to get it to shut down.

    Once I RMA this sucker for the 3rd time I will sell it and pick up the iRiver iHP-120 20 gigs of OGG, WMA, MP3, WAV, plus a remote with LCD, FM radio tuner, and can record into WAV or MP3 in realtime from a built-in mic or stereo line-in. Pretty kickass. Sure the Karma is about $75 cheaper, but for a unit that WORKS, it's worth it.

    Plus, the Karma only has a 90 day warrantee. The iRiver has a 1-year warrantee.

    1. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by Fizgig · · Score: 4, Informative

      I second that. I had one power button failure and then one where the little wheel slipped out of place (if you read the forums, this is pretty common even if you take care of your karma).

      I just got back my third karma today, and it had a sticker saying, "We will respect your initial warranty, but this unit does not come with an additional warranty." Of course, by this point they've had my karma longer than I have (it took 1.5 months to get the second replacement), and the original warranty has expired. Plus, I think it's illegal not to give a warranty on RMA'd products.

      I like that the Karma supports oggs, and it's a fairly nice device, but it's pretty fragile (two external moving parts), and the RMA service is _horrible_!

    2. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by back_pages · · Score: 1
      I just got back my third karma today, and it had a sticker saying, "We will respect your initial warranty, but this unit does not come with an additional warranty." ... Plus, I think it's illegal not to give a warranty on RMA'd products.

      This is EXACTLY the policy at my ex-employer's business, and if this is actually illegal, I would love to get them nailed for it. I wonder if this is the type of thing that would be regulated by state or local laws? Not only am I not a lawyer, I wouldn't even know how to search for the answer. Presumably Google isn't a good source, else everyone would be a lawyer...

    3. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got curious and dug this up on Google:
      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspu bs/warran ty.htm
      <p><p>
      What you seek may be in there.

    4. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by abischof · · Score: 1

      Once I RMA this sucker for the 3rd time I will sell it and pick up the iRiver iHP-120 20 gigs of OGG, WMA, MP3, WAV, plus a remote with LCD, FM radio tuner, and can record into WAV or MP3 in realtime from a built-in mic or stereo line-in. Pretty kickass. Sure the Karma is about $75 cheaper, but for a unit that WORKS, it's worth it.

      The iHP-120 looks like a great player on paper and I would definitely buy one -- if it had Mac support. (They seem to only cater to Windows at the moment.) Are there any portable Ogg players that support Macs?
      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    5. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      You don't need the manager to use the iRiver. It can be used as a USB Mass Storage device. I just think you need some program to update the DB on the player. There are a couple of open source programs, and I believe they could work on OS X.

      There might even be an official manager program for OS X somewhere.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    6. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by kraker · · Score: 1

      Are there any portable Ogg players that support Macs?

      Well, there is the Rio Karma, of course. I haven't had any problems with mine (knock on wood). The fact that you can just plug it into your ethernet network really makes up for the looks compared to the iPod.

      But, to keep it slightly on-topic, there's no Linux for Karma (yet).

    7. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by peterprior · · Score: 1

      Face it.. you're just a whore for Karma(s)..

      I'll get my coat..

    8. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iRiver seems to have a radio, doesn't that mean I couldn't use it on an airplane? That would seriously suck, a lot of people I know bought their iPods specifically for long flights.

    9. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by AnyNoMouse · · Score: 1
      I've had my Karma for around 4 months and no problems... ain't anecdotal evidence great?

      I will concur with the 90 day warranty, though... if you really want a Karma (only player with gapless playback that works, plus an ethernet enabled dock), then it's probably best to get it with an extended warranty. 90 days is just a bit too short for modern electronics. Especially portable electronics.

      --
      -Redundancy Man strikes again!
    10. Re:Karma? Oh woe, oh woe by Bklyn · · Score: 1

      Same disappointment here. I've gone through 2 Karmas and am waiting for DNNA to send me my third.

      The first one worked fine for about 2 weeks and then suffered some sort of HD failure where it would (1) reboot, (2) flash its spinning "Rio" logo and then (3) GOTO 1.

      The second one mostly worked, but would skip ahead to the next track in the middle of playback with no provocation from any of the controls (even with the Lock switch engaged).

      Its a nice little player (when it works) and the interface doesn't suck TOO badly, but the quality control is for shit.

  47. What about NetMD? by bigredradio · · Score: 1

    I made the mistake of buying a NetMD by Sony instead of an ipod. I was aware they only supplied drivers for Windoz, but I had assumed that there has to be a hack somewhere for Mac and Linux. Come to find out there are several, but none of them can write to the minidisc. This is a perfect pet project for Linux hackers. NetMDs are cheap, small, portable, hold about 3 full albums per minidisc and run forever on a single AA battery (No need to worry if the battery goes bad. Stop into any 7-11 and get a new one.) I have looked into it myself, but I know my own limitations when it comes to reverse engineering.

    1. Re:What about NetMD? by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      I have one of these too, and it's extremely annoying that I can't throw mp3s on it. I believe the major problem is converting to the proprietary format, and then of course figuring out the exact protocol of the transfer.

      --
      I write code.
    2. Re:What about NetMD? by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      You know, this is the exact same reason I took back the MemoryStick Walkman I purchaced a few years back while working in the US.

      The software was a DRM nightmare, plus bugs which seemed to randomly eat your checkins, also if you erased the MemoryStick the songs were on you could never check them back in. Ever.

      I looked for hacks at the time to get my MP3's on the device as indicated on the box... but the small print did indicate the MP3's would be "converted". Converted into Sony's proprietary DRM format, sigh.

      I was more dissapointed with the software then the hardware, as the player itself was very sleek and sounded fantastic with the Fontopia headphones.

      Ah well, eventually I got a MiniDisc player, and then later an MP3 Nomad Jukebox, I will probably get an iPod one day. :)

  48. That's a milestone by definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um.... you're dumb. Do you know what a milestone is?

    Would anyone consider installing it before it played sound? probably not.

    Now? maybe a few.

    Guess what that is? Looky! a pretty milestone!

  49. Enough With The Forced Database Access by Effugas · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yeah. It's real great that Apple's willing to let me organize my music by Artist, Album, maybe Genre too.

    F*ck 'em. I want folders.

    I don't know how more clear to say it: When I get new music, I want it separated from my old music. I don't want to have to manage per-song playlists, and I certainly don't want to have to care about which single found its way into what Artist or Genre. The most insidious aspect of Apple's architecture (and that of the Rio Karma -- I had one of those too) is the degree to which it makes it so accursedly difficult to separate Singles and Albums, New and Old, Unfiltered and Validated, Fast Stuff and Slow. It's Apple's way or the highway.

    Heh. Sort by purchase date, THEN tell me you've integrated iTunes well.

    --Dan

    1. Re:Enough With The Forced Database Access by trans_err · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You missed the memo on playlists, right? Turns out that you can use them to create whole new methods of organizing your music... Neat, eh?

    2. Re:Enough With The Forced Database Access by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Play with the smart playlists, and the comment section of the MP3 tags.

    3. Re:Enough With The Forced Database Access by kidgenius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Get an iRiver ihp-120. It plays OGG, lets you read text files on it, and stores files in folders. So your music is as nicely organized as it would be on your main box. I have one and I love it. They run just as much as an ipod for the same amounts of storage.

    4. Re:Enough With The Forced Database Access by Effugas · · Score: 1

      Dude. Nested folders. It's 2004, we've had them for a while.

      --Dan

    5. Re:Enough With The Forced Database Access by mrklin · · Score: 2, Informative
      I see you have not used iTunes. Why not create a smart playlist that automatically grab all songs that got added to the library in the last x days?

      Oh right, you rather navigate through the nested folders to find your music!

      You are the perfect candidate for Linux on iPod that proudly proclaims it plays MP3.

    6. Re:Enough With The Forced Database Access by gyrojoe · · Score: 1

      My friend has one of these and let me just say this. It is not a bad player by any means. However, it has a rather long start-up time (15-45 seconds) which I find is rather annoying. The ability to view text files is a bit of moot point as you can do that with the iPod too (with Notes).

    7. Re:Enough With The Forced Database Access by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      I'm replying rather than modding. Actually that's not so good for you, because I was going to mod you up. I disagree with the flamebait mod.

      A month ago I was like you. I wanted an iPod but the song syncing business pissed me off. I just wanted to drop a folder and navigate like you suggest. This was the only issue keeping me away from the iPod; I almost bought the iRiver just because of this. In the end, the style, interface, and huge availability of accessories for the iPod won me over and I bought a 40G.

      Here's what I've found: Transferring files via directory isn't as great as it seems. Once you fix your id3 tags up, things are sweet: Selecting songs, playlists, and albums by tags is a hell of a lot more convenient than by directory.

      I used a little program called MP3 Tag Studio to clean things up. My singles are named (artist)-title.mp3, and my albums are named (artist)-track#-title.mp3. First I stripped the id3 tags from my files, leaving only genre intact. I then did a batch id3 tag-from-filename, one for the full albums and one for the singles. With artist, title, album name and track number tags properly filled in, the iPod sorts everything perfectly. Want to listen to a specific album? Just go to "albums", find it, and it's just like having the CD in front of you. All ordered and ready to play.

      New and old? When I transfer a batch of new songs that I want to listen to I send a playlist with it. It's not a "per-song" playlist, it's a playlist of new songs. No biggie.

      Unfiltered and Validated? Same game. Use a playlist.

      Fast stuff & slow? Tag them by genre.

      If you want to listen to singles without mixing in your albums, tag all of the singles with an album of "singles". Then play the "singles" album on the iPod.

      iPod relies heavily on the id3 tags. If your tags aren't organized, the iPod will be worthless to you. Thankfully there are tools like MP3 Tag Studio around that will clean up tags en masse with a few minutes worth of effort.

      Would I like an option to play by directory? Yes. If the Linux/iPod firmware ever supports this and also keeps all of the current features, I'll use it. However, at this point it would just be an "extra", so to speak. Owning an iPod for the few weeks I've owned mine, I no longer consider this a requirement.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  50. Linux in a shoestring! :) by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

    When they start putting linux in toasters, that will be useless

    You just wait.

    It'll be able to download settings for all your foods and intelligently decide what you're giving it, and how long to cook it.

    It isn't as far-fetched as it sounds.

    1. Re:Linux in a shoestring! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Linux has already been put in a toaster. Most really small embedded devices (appliances, phones, networking equipment, etc...) put out in the past couple of years are running some version of embedded linux, for the simple reason that it's the only large-scale OS that they can optimize for embedded use without paying enough in license fees to buy a small country. The Linux-on-toaster (and refrigerator, oven, etc...) was done a year or two ago to demonstrate "smart" appliances.

  51. What happened to the NetBSD port to iPod? by gatesh8r · · Score: 2, Funny

    The last time I heard it was after the ENIAC port which is after the PDP-7 which is after...

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
    1. Re:What happened to the NetBSD port to iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently installed NetBSD on my Ipod. I found this Slashdot story very useful in helping me deal with some of the problems I experienced after I got done with the installation.

      Just thought you might like to know.

  52. Firmware replacements are the way to go by gotr00t · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Perhaps this sounds like a very insignificant step in the development process for the iPod Linux distro, however, don't forget that the whole point of making a firmware replacement is not for "coolness," but rather for adding in functionality that would not otherwise be there in the stock firmware. There are tons of features missing from Apple's firmware, such as a graphical equalizer, queues (no, that on-the-go thing will not do!), dynamic playlists, so on, so forth. And just to think, the iPod has enough resources, processing power, to run a good OS.

    For an example of what a replacement third party firmware can do for an audio player, check out RockBox. It turns the obsolete Archos Jukebox 6000 series models into machines capable of playing music much better than the stock firmware, and also capable of doing other stuff as well.

    The bottom line: iPodLinux is a work in development. When it reaches production quality, it WILL have more features than the stock firmware, and will support more formats as well. (ogg, anyone?)

    1. Re:Firmware replacements are the way to go by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Steve Jobs will pull an 'X-box' and somehow disable it before iPodLinux can get very far.

      He's, ummm, a control freak in case you hadn't noticed.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:Firmware replacements are the way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it, and I'll tell you why.

      Apple makes money on hardware; they do not sell their device at a loss. Furthermore, what Apple has always been good at is design -- at more technical things, they've never been that great (the Lisa being a possible exception.) Witness MacOS, pre-X. Great interface, nice looking, shitty kernel. It's not where their strength is.

      So, they were smart; they recognized that they didn't need to reimplement the underlying technical shit because what sells to users is presentation, not underpinnings. So they used a modified FreeBSD kernel, knowing it was a) better than anything they could produce themselves, b) actively maintained by people they didn't pay and c) not something the end user would ever see or care about. They went and implemented a closed-source windowing system that looks great and people by OS X for that, not for the FBSD kernel.

      Extending the analogy, the iPod looks great. They don't make their own harddrives, because that's not what they're good at; people buy the iPod for the presentation. Similarly, folks don't care about firmware anymore than they care about harddrives, as long as stuff works. As I see it, Steve & Co probably are looking gleefully at this sort of project. Once it works better than the basic firmware, they'll write up a UI that runs on top of it -- that's not in violation of the GPL -- and ship it standard. Bume, they have a great piece of firmware updated by the most talented hackers that, TO BOOT, they don't have to pay, they get tremendous street credit in the open source community, and who makes the money?

      Them.

      See, Steve is smart. Very smart. He will ride the community wave, and not give anything back, because he doesn't need to. Just like he did with Darwin & OS X. And all the geeks will cheer him on. But that's the price of freedom; even those that don't believe may benefit. I just hope that Apple never sits in Microsoft's position. They are far, far more sinister.

    3. Re:Firmware replacements are the way to go by anothy · · Score: 1

      // ...the iPod has enough resources, processing power, to run a good OS.

      so then why's it running Linux?

      (/me gets fire extinguisher ready...)

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    4. Re:Firmware replacements are the way to go by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      So they used a modified FreeBSD kernel

      Actually, they just put a new coat of makeup on the whore they already owned, NeXTstep.

      They 'freshened her up' with a spritz of FreeBSD userland, yes. That's just fragrance, though.

      --
      ---
  53. Mod Parent Up by LordKazan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why has parent been modded down - this is an insightful comment

    --
    If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  54. OT by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    na, I'll just buy ron popeil's set it and forget it rotisserie and "set it and forget it"

  55. Forgot one... by Atticu5 · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, Linux runs you!

    1. Re:Forgot one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about Nathalie Portman!

      BoD

  56. for those who have a karma.. by minus_273 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    does it run linux? :-p

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:for those who have a karma.. by Ankle · · Score: 0

      It runs ECOS a multitasking, mostly POSIX-compliant Open Source OS designed for embedded systems. http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/about.html

  57. Beowulf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think of the possibilities... a Beowulf cluster made out of of iPods 8)

    Amazing

  58. Why It's Useful by obijywk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The reason to have an alternative operating system for the iPod is to add new features! There are so many great things that can be done with the hardware in the iPod, that Apple is only beginning to scratch the surface of (or not even considering at all).

    • Using the iPod as a recording device (better then those little voice recorders can do)
    • OGG (and other formats as well) support
    • iPod-to-iPod music transfers (legally questionable but still a cool concept)

    Not to mention adding features to the 1G and 2G iPods that are only available on the 3G firmware... I would run Linux on my 2G iPod if it provided functionality similar to the On-The-Go playlists on the newer iPods. Open-source firmware could even improve on these features, such as having the ability to name and save a playlist you've made away from your computer.

    Finally, feature additions such as these might keep Apple on their toes - they couldn't let their own firmware become stale, because the alternative would always be improving. I think the Linux on iPod firmware is a great idea, and I wish the developers the best of luck.

    1. Re:Why It's Useful by crem_d_genes · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      The reason to have an alternative operating system for the iPod is to add new features! There are so many great things that can be done with the hardware in the iPod, that Apple is only beginning to scratch the surface of (or not even considering at all).

      Using the iPod as a recording device (better then those little voice recorders can do)
      OGG (and other formats as well) support
      iPod-to-iPod music transfers (legally questionable but still a cool concept)


      I haven't gotten an iPod but I helped pick one out for my niece who is still a teenager and looking at some pretty top notch schools. My brother is like *I'm getting her a Windows computer for college because Macs blah blah blah*

      So my niece is digging the interface with the iPod itself but first my brother's family doesn't have the cables to download music from the iTunes store - and then it turns out they are still on Windows 98 - so that's not going to work anyway - so I buy her a bunch of songs.

      The point being the more accessible the iPod becomes - the more features that are unlocked or created - the more these little access points are created that says there is more than just one way of doing things. And proprietary or not, when a new use can even be discerned, soon someone will be building the harware and writing the code necessary to do the job their own way.

      And a little addition that is a bit of a digression: as for transfering the legality of transferring songs, it is possible to *create* songs and simply *give* them to a friend or fellow musician, friend, or possible future *buyers* of that music.
      Way back when, Billy Bragg *advertised* - or was it *entertained* - outside the Meadowlands at a Sprinstein concert by simply walking up and down the queue with a speaker strapped to his body and a mike and guitar plugged in.

    2. Re:Why It's Useful by dave420 · · Score: 1
      Don't you realise that apple wants their firmware to be lacking in options? They want 1Gers and 2Gers to buy 3G ipods. To do this, they withhold features and put them only in the 3G one.

      The linux version has a lot of work to do to even catch up, let alone exceeding the apple firmware.

  59. Don't forget flac playback and linux compatibility by abe+ferlman · · Score: 1

    flac is what sold me. I'm just waiting for someone to write a client that doesn't need java tho.

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
  60. On any platform by baddogatl · · Score: 0, Troll

    The ability to run Emacs is not a feature. I'd rather be using edlin on MS-DOS 2.11 than install emacs on my machine.

    Press :wq! to agree, ^C-M-TV-VH-1-S-A_Q to disagree with the current buffer and open a new videoconference.

    1. Re:On any platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You obviously are not a true vi'er. To quit and save, you should type 'ZZ', which is the actual vi(sual) command. The :wq (the ! is not necessary, because the w has brought the file up to date) command exists for compatibility with ex, which in turn is a bloated version of ed, the second greatest editor of all time.

      While it's certainly good to know the line editing commands (incidentally, :x quits and saves from ex and therefore also vi), to be a true vi god, you should use as many of the weird visual-only commands as possible.

      As an aside, I've never understood people that flame each other about vi and emacs. True hackers can use both proficiently (as well as ed), and know when one should be chosen over the other. The 'emacs commands are too long and cryptic' whine is very unhackeresque; ours is a culture that idolizes those who interface most cryptically and efficiently with their computers.

      Whining about an interface is akin to admiting that you lack the brain power to master it.

      Having said that, I tend to use vi more, because it has a smaller memory footprint and so can be comfortably invoked from the command line when emacs would be a pain, for example, when su'd root. It also serves as a better EDITOR (see env) for the same reason.

      But emacs rules because it uses lisp. Learn the ways of the hacker, son. Time spent bitching is time better spent learning how to input cryptic commands into even more cryptic software, thereby impressing your friends. If you can type something like 'C-x C-m c chinese-iso-8bit-unix C-x C-f love-ya', the women will be beating down your door.

      Trust me.

    2. Re:On any platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you shouldnt need to memorize a bajillion keyboard combos to do anything, there should be a menu at the top of the screen, you press alt to switch in between the menu and text editing, and ALL the commands are available in the menu, like EDIT for DOS. the superior CLI

  61. Limitless by Nikker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    For a bunch of nerd you disappoint me...
    • - How about pluging this thing via 1392 to an external CD-RW ???
    • - How about using the interface via WI-FI to do war driving / walking ;)
    • - How about using it to hold ISO's of your latest distro that you could use as a more direct form of data transfer .....
    Just to name a few ideas ......
    This can be alot cooler than some of you are even starting to scratch the surface
    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    1. Re:Limitless by fozzmeister · · Score: 1

      - How about pluging this thing via 1392 to an external CD-RW ??? Assuming Firewire is like USB the IPod will only work as a client, the CDRW will be a client making this impossible - How about using the interface via WI-FI to do war driving / walking ;) See above - How about using it to hold ISO's of your latest distro that you could use as a more direct form of data transfer Well you could do this, as your just accessing a file on a storage medium, but you should be able to do this anway!

    2. Re:Limitless by pmjordan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Assuming Firewire is like USB the IPod will only work as a client, the CDRW will be a client making this impossible
      You're making a false assumption. Firewire is a peer-to-peer bus, in theory, each device can talk to any other device on the bus. There is a root node, but that's elected on every bus reset ([un-]plugging of a device) as far as I know. So a CD-RW may well be possible. phil

    3. Re:Limitless by fozzmeister · · Score: 1

      Wow, I thought about that briefly before posting but decided that'd be cool and I'd surely know about it if it was that clever!

    4. Re:Limitless by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The second idea is pointless. iPod's only real advantage over a handheld is that it has a large hard drive (no need for expensive CF/SD cards).

      If you want to use 802.11, just buy a card and plug it in your handheld.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Limitless by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Not to be too much of an ass, but the title for IEEE 1392 is "Recommended Practice for Terminology - Definition of Terms for Virtual Reality" and has been withdrawn as a standard. The iPod uses IEEE 1394 which is also known as Firewire to connect to a computer. Using terms for virtual reality to connect an external CD-RW to an iPod would be interesting to say the least.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  62. iRiver? by Twintop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone heard of an effort to get Linux running on any of the iRiver series of MP3 players? I know they don't have as large of a hard drive (mine has 256 for storage, but they go up to 1GB I believe), but their firmware is just plain crappy. It might be interesting to see support for the FM Radio Tuner on it, too.

  63. Re:for those who have a karma..(Way Offtopic) by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Do you have links/references to backup your sig?

    very curious...

    tx

  64. More Features by Bruha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be cool to see a small 65k color touch screen that could be put into this unit also. Then maybe a media player could play small videos from the hard drive as well.

    I think the "Better features is a bust but the future holds promise"

    iPod meshing would be cool to tie into your buddies iPod and access his files and maybe someone could make aftermarket jackets that would let the usb port power a 1xRTT or 802.11x card which could turn the iPod into a digital media device over a network.

    With Linux the possibilities are endless!

  65. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well then its not for you.
    and you should ignore it
    because its for some peope that havea bit of intellect not like your pooping scenario

    so duh

  66. Errata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on guys. It works on all ipod models other "than" the new mini. And ... it has more features "than" the original iPod firmware!

    Where did you learn English? Australia?

    1. Re:Errata by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1, Funny

      This sounds like the product of an American school system.

  67. Please mod this back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll or not, it started a good discussion which is now scattered all over the bottom of the page for most users browsing at 0.

    Troll != "I don't agree with this person."

  68. Re:for those who have a karma..(Way Offtopic) by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    No links since the western media (barring the BBC, but they are very biased) ignores it. This is what it is about.
    as for AI, they openly support these thugs and regualrly hold rallies in the capital.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  69. Linux! On an iPod! Think of the possibilites!! by barfarf · · Score: 1
    You can play music files on it! You can use it as a portable storage device!

    ... oh... wait...

    /kidding


    Actually, as useless as that is to me, I still think it's wickedly cool that it can be done.

  70. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Drakonian · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There are tonnes of reasons! First, copy the Apple firmware look & feel as closely as possible. Then, add features and fix bugs. Here are a few ideas:

    • Fix the terrible lack of randomness in the shuffle
    • Implement cross fade
    • Implement on-the-go playlists for the people who originally clamoured for them - 1st gen owners
    • Implement a file browser
    --
    Random is the New Order.
  71. I recommend this... by TomMajor · · Score: 1

    asono sound hub
    It has 20gig 1.8" HD, is small enough to slip into your pocket and plays
    MP3, WMA, OGG files. It even has an FM radio. I love it....

    --



    Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies...
  72. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Drakonian · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Oops, I forgot the one most people here care about: Add Ogg support! (Or WMP or FLAC or whatever)

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  73. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    holy jesus testicles, did you just equate putting linux on the ipod with taking a big steaming shit on your neighbor's lawn?

    god damn, you are one dumb shit, you know that?

  74. Ipod manatees by dj245 · · Score: 1
    Anyone else read that as "Linux for Ipod Manatees"??

    must be time for bed.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  75. But... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    "You're paying a premium for software design & integration with the iPod."

    You gain a bundle in name/fame recognition.
    When you are doing for shits and giggles style points count big.

  76. A mini Karma Review by ebbomega · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're having troubles.

    A lot of people are getting Hard Drive errors with their Karmas. I just got mine back from Warranty replacement (after a month-and-a-half wait and plenty of complaining). Mine broke after 2 weeks of use. Apparently, according to the folks at the Riovolution Forum a lot of people have had this problem (in the same time frame) and are currently going through Hell getting a replacement. I'm surprised I got mine so quickly.

    Aside from that, I'm liking the Karma a lot. I just hope my replacement doesn't crap out the same as the first one did. If it does I'm aiming for an iPod.

    Other than that, RMML (Rio Music Manager Lite) is a Java-based app that syncs up with the Karma over a dock that can be connected via ethernet. The coolness of this being that it's completely platform independent, and will run on any system that can run Java, including my fedora box. Its compatibility to be runnable on Linux is the main reason why I liked this. OGG and FLAC support are just extras. =)

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
    1. Re:A mini Karma Review by onco_p53 · · Score: 1

      I started reading these comments carefully while I was waiting for my Karma to ship (I live in New Zealand).

      The conclusion that I draw is that if your hard drive / wheel / stick is going to fail, it will probably do so in the first couple of weeks. this would be during the "burn-in phase" when you transfer 13 GB, listening to it constantly (note: whilst on busy road biking is not a good idea), charge and discharge ect...

      Mine has been going strong since Jan 22 (cross fingers / touch wood).

      This poll tells part of the story, but has a rediculously small sample size (74).

  77. MOD PARENT UP +1 FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    holy jesus cum, that's great. 'fucking karma whore' in response to a post talking about the karma mp3 player...hahahaha

  78. Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Create a smart playlist. Choose filter by date. Insert a start date. Insert another filter. Choose filter by date again. Insert an end date. Wonder at the rocket science involved. Feel like a moron for griping about the lack of a feature that's been there since they started selling the things...

  79. OK.. try this on for size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the last few days a work mate of mine has been bagging the ipod because it doesnt support a number of features he wants...

    i told him... frankly.. that apple will never supply the features he wants... but a project like this.. means he will be able to have a shot at implementing them himself... ....
    like.... wouldn't it be cool if you could run a some voice synth software on you linux ipod... (using AT&T voices) that let you listen to long technical text documents... either with the voice synth running in realtime on the pod... or perhaps baking the audio to an mp3 if it turns out the ipod processor isn't fast enough... (yes you can do this on a desktop before transferring it to a laptop..., but it would cooler if all you needed on the pod was the original text)

    i think its a safe bet that nobody is going to be doing this anytime soon commercially.... but it might have a chance of happening if there is a niche open os for the pod...

    1. Re:OK.. try this on for size... by 1q2w3e4r5t · · Score: 1

      There is a utility called "iSpeak" which will automatically take Word, HTML, PDF, RTF, AppleWorks and Text files and convert them into MP3/AAC files and then route them through iTunes to your iPod and you're good to go. Of course the text-to-speach conversion is being done on your Mac not the iPod, so it's going to take up more space on your iPod, but the things have loads of room on them...

  80. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever since the iPod became redundant it's been crying out for a linux or netBSD port... what else is there?

  81. Re:Enough With The... + Some Ideas by EMIce · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is flamebait, and I should mod it as such, but I think it'll make more of a difference if I explain why I would.

    Who is going to go making playlists for every one of their folders and then update those playlists every time they add new folders? I see a problem here, one where the ipod playlists become a pain in the ass to keep up - why keep the same data in two places where they will surely fall out of sync without tedious manual synhronization?

    I also use folders to make a custom nested format which separates songs by language, style, and year. You can't do that with playlists. A final plus for me is that browsing by folder avoids using ID3 tags, many of which aren't present on the the thousands of foreign language mp3s I have. The original ipod firmware lists a lot of songs as Unknown for me - I have to play them to figure out what the songs are - how useful is that?

    The parent's response is similar to the many I saw on the ipodlounge forums. When people asked about browsing by folder, a bunch of apple zealots would shoot em down saying apple's way is better and that they should use it because it is easier. Well not in my case.

    -----Some Ideas for the Ipod Linux

    A neat thing that has been overlooked - wait till someone replaces the drive with a wireless CF card! We'll get an mp3 player that can be used anywhere around the house to stream music over the local network. We'll have to wait till the Linux firmware can actually play mp3s without skipping though, something the original article submission kinda implied could be done. It appears this is because they are relying on the processor to decode mp3s rather than whatever proprietary hardware mp3 decoder/encoder hardware is in there. Hopefully soon, if they do it at all, they will reverse engineer how to control the mp3 chip in there.

    Another idea - what about streaming HDTV over the network and through through the firewire port? A TV with firewire port can do the decoding! Streaming mpeg2 to a firewire equipped HDTV wouldn't require the ipod to do any decoding, so it appears there should be enough procesing power to do this. It'd be nice to see an ipod docked next to the HDTV, and able to play video content from the PC. Didn't Netflix just announce downloadable rentals? Write a program that transcodes the rental into mpeg2 in real time and streams it through the IPOD onto a big TV screen. Pretty neat.

  82. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As closely as _legally_ possible

  83. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by tkanerva · · Score: 3, Interesting

    let me add some more.

    * add SIDPLAY and MOD/XM support so that one can enjoy the full MOD galore without first going through the arduous task of converting them to AAC or MP#
    * implement a pitch control with the wheel (so I can do some actual dj'ing on the device, or, rather, on 2 devices :)

    what's more? there must be a lot more features I want to have. from file formats to fixing stupidities of the existing software :)

    --
    still running a x86? dinosaurs do exist!
  84. From the website's FAQ: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: Can you imagine a beowulf cluster...

    Brilliant!

  85. Synhronized Wireless Recorders with 802.11 by EMIce · · Score: 0

    What about a bunch of these linux based ipods wirelessly networked with 802.11 compact flash cards, recording synchronized audio streams to a master wireless laptop? Great for recording multi-track music or for film soundtrack. There is a huge market for this - digital recorders exist for these applications but a system with all the features ipod linux could offer is ridiculously expensive. The ipod is a mass produced, and thus a relatively low cost product that could be useful in bringing down costs for smaller productions that are willing to hack it. Heck, properly made, it wouldn't even have to be a hack.

    Now we just have to wait and see if the ipod linux team can break the code of the proprietary mp3 encoder/decorder built into the ipod. Ipod linux doesn't quite record or play mp3s yet.

  86. Re:again!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehe... you're funny.

  87. It does MP3, OGG, WAV and more by sagefire.org · · Score: 4, Informative
    Oh, if /.ers would RTFA...

    User Tools

    The full uClinux distribution contains many basic tools (including Busybox) already patched for use with uClinux.

    MAD is a MP3 player that does not require a FPU.

    Tremor is an OGG player that does not require a FPU.

    SoX is an audio processing application capable of playing a variety of music formats (.WAV is probably the most interesting here).

    Intel's IPP package and IPP MP3 Sample program. Intel's IPP is a highly optimised set of libraries that includes MP3 processing. The sample program seems to work fine under uClinux.

  88. Let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Apple shut down the MP3 player for PDAs that had an iPod like interface, so won't they shut down this project now that it's copied (rather poorly) the iPod interface?

    1. Re:Let's see... by rofthorax · · Score: 1

      You still have to purchase an iPod to use it..

      Apple has nothing to fear of this..

      Now if Apple started selling iPod's with a value add that you could store photos and video on the devices, and play them back, they might want to try to "can" this project, however, its open source..

      My guess is that they should focus on just making smaller and more capable hardware, and stop trying to make clever software interfaces,
      and would probably just sink money into the development of players through the linux community.

      The best way to develop a market is to embrace its fanaticism with your product. It just gets worse if you try to control it, because if you do, it will get stronger and bypass you altogether..

      --
      Just say no to license servers!!
  89. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's not as if you get a discount on your iPod for running Linux.


    I for one am waiting for the protests and petitions demanding to be able to buy an iPod without an iPodOS tax...
  90. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Quantum+Jim · · Score: 1
    And until Linux has native support for some of the consumer technologies that make the iPod so cool (i.e., DirectX) what is the point of installing Linux on it?

    What does the Apple iPod have to do with Microsoft DirectX?

    --
    It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly unless one has plenty of work to do.
    - Jerome Klapka Jerome
  91. Re:Enough With The... + Some Ideas by Alystair · · Score: 1

    When the next version of Ephpod gets released it will automatically make a playlist for every directory probed. My $5 in beer money in the works :)

  92. You know nothing, and presume everything. by mfh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here's a suggestion: use the software you criticize, before you criticize it.

    iTunes' smart playlists are automatically synchronized with the iPod, and boast features that your "custom nested format" wouldn't ever dream of achieving.

    You can have:

    Normal, every-day playlists, with playback order sorted by name, artist, time, album, genre, last played, rating, or random.

    Or, you can have DYNAMIC, automatically synced playlists that update themselves based on any combination or exclusion of the following criteria:

    Album, artist, song BPM, bitrate, comment, compilation membership, composer, date added, modified, genre, grouping, kind, last played, my rating, play count, sample rate, size, song number, time, track number, year.

    That's a few more options than your "separates songs by language, style, and year" now isn't it?

    The grouping and contextual modifiers are the following: contains, does not contain, is, is not, starts with, ends with.

    This is presented as an arbitrary number and combination of graphical pull-down menus, easy enough for a novice user to use, yet powerful enough for someone versed in a language like SQL to understand and exploit to its fullest capabilities. What iTunes is doing is abstracting the presentation of your songs from the storage, which is what an mp3 player SHOULD do. The filesystem isn't smart, it isn't dynamic, and it isn't flexible. If you don't agree with this, then you're in denial. The very existence of playlists is proof positive that the abstraction is appropriate.

    Your "case" is a strawman argument. You made this wild scheme of organizing mp3s because your software had no decent way of organizing music and organizing your playlists. Now that you have this half-baked limp solution for organization, you don't realize that better functionality has been designed into other players from the beginning. You're in the dark, buddy. Step into the 21st century. You want to browse by folders? Browse the Library on disk and double click to play your selected mp3. You want it organized some other way? Use dynamic smart playlists.

    As far as ID3 tags go, it's nobody's fault but your own that your mp3s don't have that information in them. Another strawman argument. All of my mp3s have up-to-date ID3 information, either from CDDB or me typing in the info when I import something. Just because huge amounts of pirated mp3s don't contain correct information isn't a valid argument against the use of a useful technology like ID3.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:You know nothing, and presume everything. by EMIce · · Score: 1

      Gee thanks genius. A bunch of features which I can't bloody use! These all require ID3 tags, including your dynamic *playlists*. What did I say about playlists and my thousands of mp3s that don't have ID3 tags? What country are you from, you probably only get english music that comes pre-tagged. You haven't been in my situation, you arrogant twit. I have a pre-existing collection, of mostly Hindi music, and I don't have the time to go though thousands of mp3s and re-tag them in a relational manner using keywords. Do you have any idea how much time that would take? There are other things to do, you know - like going out and having a life. Can you really say it is my fault for not being anal enough to edit every song I ever downloaded, adding appropriate, systemized tag information? Are you crazy? You say it is nobody's fault that my songs aren't tagged but at the same time you expect them to be tagged. Who is going to do this? - thus I need an alternative UI option.

      Obviously my argument about ID3 tags is not a straw man argument. A straw man argument would be trying knock down another position, like apple's present organizational system. I like it and am not trying to knock it, as I said, it is not good in "in my case". I am just saying there should be an alternative. What are you, some kind of an apple nazi?

      In fact it is your argument that is the straw man. You presented a distorted view of my argument and knocked that down in order to try and knock down my original argument. I never said the apple organizational system in and of itself was bad. Again, I repeat, I need an alternative option - apples system should not be slated for destruction - I am not "against" it. What are you card carrying member of the republican party? A lot of folks on slashdot are a lot more conservative than they realize.

    2. Re:You know nothing, and presume everything. by mrklin · · Score: 1
      Lame response.

      I have Chinese MP3 that I was able to tag in iTunes in OS X easily so the fact that they are Hindi does make a difference (what, your OS does not support unicode/hindi/whatever????).

      Furthermore, tagging is the easiest and, dare I say it, universally recognized way to organize digital msuic music, which is why virtually all digital music player support tagging. Arranging by folders is, as you call it, an alternative solution when one cannot correctly tag MP3's for whatever reason (#1 being user error).

      To blame Apple or anyone else for not doing the stupid way is just, well, stupid.

    3. Re:You know nothing, and presume everything. by immyz · · Score: 1

      iTunes' smart playlists are automatically synchronized with the iPod, and boast features that your "custom nested format" wouldn't ever dream of achieving

      Whatever, smartass. Try that when your entire MP3 collection has no id3 tags. id3 is great, but I want choice. MP3's have been organized hierarchially on my filesystem since I started using MP3's and will always be that way.

      As far as ID3 tags go, it's nobody's fault but your own that your mp3s don't have that information in them. Another strawman argument. All of my mp3s have up-to-date ID3 information, either from CDDB or me typing in the info when I import something. Just because huge amounts of pirated mp3s don't contain correct information isn't a valid argument against the use of a useful technology like ID3.

      Even if I used iTMS for every song on my drive, it wouldn't be how I want it: If I let iTunes move the MP3's around based on id3 tags, I'd have folders each for [Jimi Hendrix, Jimi Hendrix and Jim Morrison] when IN MY MENTAL ORGANIZATION, it is just Hendrix, I should be able to organize it as just Hendrix for easy recall. Apple is usually all about how I want it which is why I love Macs.

      I want to browse by folders on my iPod and that is why I will continue to try to fix my unstable Archos Jukebox until it goes kaput for good.

  93. Well... by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1

    ...that's great stuff, than...

  94. Oh sweet sweet irony... by Walkiry · · Score: 1

    Delicious you are!

    From the original post:
    The parent's response is similar to the many I saw on the ipodlounge forums. When people asked about browsing by folder, a bunch of apple zealots would shoot em down saying apple's way is better and that they should use it because it is easier. Well not in my case.

    Then your reply:
    iTunes' smart playlists are automatically synchronized with the iPod, and boast features that your "custom nested format" wouldn't ever dream of achieving.

    Beautiful. Let me put it clear for you, the all amazing features iTunes has for making playlists mean squat to the original poster. As far as he's concerned, he doesn't give a shit about them, because he wants to organize HIS music in HIS own way, which is what works for HIM.

    And not only that, I for one also organize my music in nested directories the way I see fit when I rip my CDs, and no whizzy ultra-featured playlist generator can beat my knowing exactly where in the directory tree things are because I organize them that way. I know quite a few people that do the same (although we all know how the plural of "anecdote" is not "data"). The point is that directory trees are an excellent way to organize all sorts of files, not just music, and it's totally retarded that something that simple is not supported.

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  95. Re:for those who have a karma..(Way Offtopic) by dave420 · · Score: 1
    So that's a negatory then, good buddy.

    Why, pray tell, are the BBC biassed? Just wondering...

  96. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by biglig2 · · Score: 1

    They mention that since the remote control is basically just working on a serial port they might be able to connect a keyboard that way.

    And of course it all comes back to the answer to the core quesiton of "why run linux on anything", which , apart from "becaus eoit is cool" is also" because you can then relatively easily port mountains of existing FOSS onto your device.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  97. Easy: OGG. by torpor · · Score: 1

    I want to use .ogg files for everything. I don't care about Apple's features so much ... but if I could put .ogg files on my iPod, use it as a disk, and still have playback capabilities on the road through a Linux interface, this would be ideal.

    Not to mention that Linux on iPod makes a great stealth platform. From my iPod connected to a target network, I could launch all sorts of extremely useful processes ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  98. There's nothing ironical about it. by mfh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As long as we're talking about the original poster here, the original poster said iTunes' functionality lacked the ability to do things HE wanted.

    Except he was WRONG, it has the exact functionality he wanted, plus the functionality he said DIDN'T exist.

    Does this make any sense to you at all? My god. To recap:

    iTunes functionality includes his "custom" scheme of presentation, as well as MUCH MUCH more. He was complaining that iTunes' organizational functionality EXCLUDED the way he does things.

    Of course you can dream up of some inefficient, inflexible custom bullshit solution and complain that your solution doesn't exist in commercial software. That's the very definition of a strawman argument, which is what I'm trying to expose here.

    I'm not going to berate your old school ways of doing things (I wrote perl and bash scripts to parse and organize my mp3 library back in.. uhh, maybe 1998, but I've moved on from that morass of bullshit and settled down in the modern world now) but I _AM_ going to correct assumptions made that are totally wrong!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:There's nothing ironical about it. by EMIce · · Score: 1

      I admit that I didn't realize itunes can organize mp3s the way I would like to see them via tags and dynamic playlists, but that is besides the point. Your response *is* ironic as Walkiry pointed out, because it involves playlists, which require tagging. I've already made it clear that re-tagging thousands of mp3s isn't an option. It would be too tedious for reasons that are throughly argued in my response to your original (clearly misguided) reply to my post.

    2. Re:There's nothing ironical about it. by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      I've already made it clear that re-tagging thousands of mp3s isn't an option. It would be too tedious

      I'm not trying to rile you up, just sharing information that may help you. I retagged over 5,000 songs after I bought my iPod. Took me maybe half an hour, and most of that time was waiting for MP3 Tag Studio to do it's thing. If your filenames and directory structures are setup a certain way, you just tell MP3 Tag Studio what that method is and it will pull the information from the files/directories and import it into the id3 tags of the files. Watch:

      My files are all: (Artist)-Title.mp3.
      Example: (Aurora)-Hear You Calling.mp3.

      So in MP3 Tag Studio, I select the base level directory, turn recursion on, and put in: ()-.mp3. Couple of minutes later all of my music was tagged.

      I also add the track number to my full albums and put them in their own directory. For example: /Full Albums/Newsboys/Step Up To The Microphone/(Newsboys)-03-Entertaining Angels.mp3. MP3 Tag Studio handles that as well: /()--.mp3

      It's not tedious and it won't take days worth of manual typing. There are tools available that will do this for you. If you don't use Windows I'm sure someone wrote something similar for your platform. Or borrow a friend's Windows box for a minute and use MP3 Tag Studio.

      I know - you don't feel like you should have to do this. Apple should just let you organize by directory. I agree, this should be an option, but after updating my id3 tags I enjoy it this way. I still sort by directory on my hard drive, but I batch-tag everything before adding it to my library so it's useful both in Winamp's media library and on my iPod.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  99. Its a matter of form. by torpor · · Score: 1

    The iPod form-factor pretty much cannot be beat. My gen-1 iPod still functions extremely well, gets 8 to 10 hours worth of battery life, and fits in my clothes like no other device. It is 100% a bar of soap product.

    This is a good form factor for computing. If I can put my POSIX apps on it -and there are lots of interesting apps for uClinux- then I have myself a portable music player which also functions as a working computing platform.

    (Computing platforms do not have to be fast, latest and greatest, RAM-stuffed beheamoths in order to be a functioning, operational computing platform...)

    For the, the biggest draw of iPod on Linux is the fact that the iPod just still, to this day, feels good. Give me a C compiler for it, and it will rock the world ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  100. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well eventually you could be able to copy files from one ipod to another via firewire without the use of a computer. Now that and ogg playback would be cool don't you think?

  101. Stuff Linux, FLAC support is the clincher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still waiting and hoping for a FLAC component for QuickTime.

  102. Let's run it down, shall we? by mfh · · Score: 1
    I also use folders to make a custom nested format which separates songs by language, style, and year.


    Yes, that's nice, iTunes does that too. What if you want to change your separations? Spend an entire afternoon moving "thousands" of mp3s around? That's your business, I guess.


    You can't do that with playlists.


    Actually, yes you can do that, and much, much more. In other words, HE WAS WRONG. <---- MAIN POINT OF MY ORIGINAL POST, HERE!


    A final plus for me is that browsing by folder avoids using ID3 tags, many of which aren't present on the the thousands of foreign language mp3s I have. The original ipod firmware lists a lot of songs as Unknown for me - I have to play them to figure out what the songs are - how useful is that?


    There are many utilities that can take a filename and convert it into meaningful ID3 data. You can kill two birds with one stone, and use the features in your iPod to boot.


    Did I make it clear enough for you what I was trying to point out?

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Let's run it down, shall we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're still trying to tell him that the WHOLE WAY HE ORGANIZES MP3S IS WRONG, as if there is a 'wrong' and 'right' way.

      fucking nazi.

  103. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

    The sooner iPods can play higher quality ogg streams without the digital restrictions management is a "good thing". And the sooner the conversion process is streamlined for the average user to be able to de-DRM-ify their iPod, the better.

    I have an iPod, and I have no DRM on it at all. People seem to forget that you can load MP3s & AACs on it, not just songs from the iTunes Music Store.

    Just as well, since iTMS is only available in the US!

    --
    Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
  104. Utilities. by mfh · · Score: 1

    There are literally dozens of utilities written for every platform to go through any number of mp3s and take information from the filename and construct usable ID3 tags out of it. Again, just because you didn't know about it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Ignorance is funny like that. They're fairly smart in the translation, too, in case you're going to say some shit like "all my mp3 files are named in a different format with different symbols separating all the artists and titles and blah blah oh my god it's hopeless."

    I'm simply suggesting that you FIX YOUR PROBLEM, instead of resorting to ridiculous methods of kludgingly organizing your masses of broken files into a semi-useable format, and then criticizing well-designed software for not supporting your horrible method of organization.

    As for having a life - yes, I've got one, and I don't spend it organizing my thousands of mp3s into neat little directories on disk. Although that's what I used to do _six_ years ago, and I feel your pain.

    I'm not an Apple nazi, I'm a misinformation nazi. I do the same thing with Linux and BSD when I run across people who really just don't know what they're talking about. I like to play this game to see how rude and arrogant I can be with ignorant people that are obviously wrong before they get so pissed off that they start calling me names.

    Have a nice day.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Utilities. by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      >>I'm simply suggesting that you FIX YOUR PROBLEM

      That's the point. He doesn't have a problem. He already has all the information he needs in the directory tree. The "problem" is the iPod refusing to use it and making him jump over hoops.

      You know, your responses are like saying "Of course you can grep files in Notepad, just use the powerful Ctrl+F feature! Not only that, it'll let you replace text and even edit it, try doing that with your wimpy grep!"

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    2. Re:Utilities. by Hast · · Score: 1

      Just a friendly advice for the future. While I'm sure that you are quite correct as far as using iPods are concerrned you should try giving advice a bit nicer in the future. You do come off as a total prick with a truckload of sand up your vagina (as Cartman would have put it) in this thread.

      Furthermore, you don't seem to even attempt to understand why the original poster doesn't want to use ID3 tags. You only conclude that he must be a moron for not using it and then go off on a big rant about that.

      While I agree that the original poster should consider using a tagging program to tag his files there may be other issues with it. (Such as Unicode since many programs fuck that up.)

      Your advice are sound but the presentation needs a lot of work. I mean, your posts pissed me off and I don't even have an iPod. ;-)

    3. Re:Utilities. by EMIce · · Score: 1
      Here we go again.

      There are literally dozens of utilities written for every platform to go through any number of mp3s and take information from the filename and construct usable ID3 tags out of it. Again, just because you didn't know about it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Ignorance is funny like that. They're fairly smart in the translation, too, in case you're going to say some shit like "all my mp3 files are named in a different format with different symbols separating all the artists and titles and blah blah oh my god it's hopeless."

      Naturally, like the many people who have researched this predicament through the forums at ipodlounge, I have downloaded these fancy taggers, taking similar suggestions from ipodlounge in good faith. Yeah, the ones that use heuristic techniques and also let you select multiple mp3s to tag common information quickly. You overestimate these tools and underestimate the labor you have put into them. If my file and directory names were consistent a fancy tagger would be fine - but they aren't and I don't want them to be. Sometimes the artist is named just in the folder, sometimes the album, or sometimes just the category. Artist and song name appear in the filename only sometimes. Sometimes meta-data is visible over 2-3 directory levels, sometimes not. This is dependant on a lot of factors, but put simply, it makes sense when you browse. Consistency isn't always desirable in a UI, different kinds of music call for different organizational schemes. To recap and conclude - my mp3 collection's file and directory names are by no means consistent, so forget the heuristic tagger - I'd have to do some hand editing for most tags anyway. It kind of defeats the purpose.

      Also as you said, it would take tagging mp3s with keywords and setting up dynamic playlists to achieve anything like what I have now. So I'd have to hand tag anyway! Don't simplify the tagging problem, it isn't so. Sure tagging is a consistent way to store meta-data, but it is very tedious and would still require me to make special rule sets just to maintain the optimally usable structure I have developed for myself.

      I'm simply suggesting that you FIX YOUR PROBLEM, instead of resorting to ridiculous methods of kludgingly organizing your masses of broken files into a semi-useable format, and then criticizing well-designed software for not supporting your horrible method of organization.

      Yes it is kludgery, but sometimes you need kludgery to support a legacy system. The costs of moving to and maintaining the new system are too high! And you know what, the old system is a lot more than semi-usable. It is good for my needs, and requires what is within the range of a reasonable effort. And again, I am not "criticizing" or "against" apple's organizational scheme - it is good, but my situation warrants an easily implementable legacy alternative. I would use apple's present organizational system if all my mp3s came from iTunes or were ripped from CDDB listed albums. Then the added effort would be more reasonable. Stop painting things in black and white. It is a simple fact of life that my ID3 tags have and will continue to come as a mess. This is true for a sizeable minority of ipod users and they need an alternative.

      As for having a life - yes, I've got one, and I don't spend it organizing my thousands of mp3s into neat little directories on disk. Although that's what I used to do _six_ years ago, and I feel your pain.

      Well I am glad you have gotten a life since six years ago. Unfortunately I am in a position where I presently have a life, and will have one for the foreseeable future. My mp3s don't come tagged, so the tagging situation here is a akin to what you were doing six years ago, and even worse with the rule sets and keywords you suggest for dynamic playlists. It would take serious time to make something as nice as what I have now based in the new system, and I would

    4. Re:Utilities. by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      That's the point. He doesn't have a problem. He already has all the information he needs in the directory tree. The "problem" is the iPod refusing to use it and making him jump over hoops.

      So download a batch tagger, run it once, and you're done. Or buy an iRiver and deal with it's annoyances (problems with too many characters in filenames, etc).

      Me, I batch-tagged my files and went on with life.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  105. Other than, not other then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez!

  106. No longer to use Itunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I realy don't like to use Itunes for uploading my mp3's. Is it possible with this Linux Update to use an alternative?

    Piethein Strengholt

  107. Back up of digital photos on the go? by ToKsUri · · Score: 1

    It could be the starting point for automatically connecting the usb/firewire of the ipod to a digital camera and uploading all the memory in the camera to the ipod. You could now go on long holidays with just a 128MB memory card and your ipod, and comeback with thousands of crappy photos to show to your friends.

    1. Re:Back up of digital photos on the go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... you can already do this. Belkin makes a memory card to iPod reader.

  108. I'm done here. by mfh · · Score: 1

    Your analogy is pretty bogus.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:I'm done here. by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      What a compelling argument! Why didn't I see it before?

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    2. Re:I'm done here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His analogy looks spot-on from here.

      HTH

  109. Because.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... the leaked Windows NT code is too big and buggy?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  110. Oh come on. by mfh · · Score: 1

    It's just the internet. It's nothing personal.

    And I'm the one that got called a Nazi and a prick. Personally I find typical polite and fruity Slashdot banter to be kind of lame. I'm just trying to inject a little spice into everyone's day!

    p.s. If you read my other posts, you'll see I fully understand why he hasn't tagged his MP3s, or they didn't come tagged (he pirated a boatload of them, and now is too lazy to fix it, just like I did/was many years ago - come on, the situation isn't exactly hard to figure out), and offer suggestions in two (2) separate posts.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Oh come on. by EMIce · · Score: 1

      Nazi.. it was a metaphor. An "apple nazi" - not quite as harsh as being called a real Nazi. Note the distinction. It isn't a small one.

      If further instruction is necessary, seek the definition of "hyperbole" at dictionary.com.

    2. Re:Oh come on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you, apple zealot.

  111. And then people ask why we are freaked out. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Given that people like the parent poster equates reality with a design decision taken by MS or Apple, I am very happey to stick to my "ideological reasons" to have a choice of UI in the Linux world.

    Sad how wo many people have given up choice and freedom to be mouthfed whatever theit IT overlords decide is "reality".

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:And then people ask why we are freaked out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Id rather be given a good ui from the it gods that are microsoft and apple, then choose from the utter crap linux has to offer

    2. Re:And then people ask why we are freaked out. by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

      No, it's a choice made without feeling somehow guilty that I have to pay for the software I prefer. The reality is that I prefer the UI of Windows XP. I prefer a whole lot of applications that I can use in Windows XP to the either half-assed or non-existent Linux equivalents. You see that word, "prefer"? It means I like my setup better than yours. You don't have to care about that, only that you do things the way you like them.

      If you're one of those idealogues, don't be offended - it's just an observation.

  112. Re:Enough With The... + Some Ideas by mst76 · · Score: 1

    > A neat thing that has been overlooked - wait till someone replaces the drive with a wireless CF card!

    That would only work if the iPod has a full PCMCIA/CF controller, which is rather unlikely. CompactFlash (which is just PCMCIA in a smaller form factor) is a superset of IDE. A CF card can use IDE mode, emulating a standard IDE hard disk. It has a flash-memory mode, which is used by many cameras. Most CF memory cards implement both IDE and flash memory (the microdrives in the mini iPods just do IDE, which is why they don't work in cameras). Finally there is IO mode, which is used for CF modems, (wifi) lan, and others. The iPod probably has just an IDE controller to interface with the disk, so a CF Wifi card will never work.

  113. Zealotry is ugly by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

    You don't have to take offense every time someone finds an issue with your pet product.

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  114. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by BESTouff · · Score: 1
    Don't get me wrong, I love Linux (I manage an 80-node Linux Beowulf cluster at work)

    Of those. That's not a "Linux Beowulf cluster", that's a "Beowulf cluster of those".

    Noob

  115. Links to Free Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To enjoy Linux on the iPod even more, here are some links to free music.

  116. Linux Connectivity to other MP3 Players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though I don't know of a Linux port for other MP3 players, here are some informations how to connect different MP3 players, e.g. the Nomad or the Rio players.

  117. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by BESTouff · · Score: 1
    But why would you take a working iPod and install Linux on it? It's not as if you get a discount on your iPod for running Linux.

    Well, running a GPL firmware has advantages. Archos users who do that benefit from more features, more stability than with the original firmware.

  118. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The neighbor's dog crapped in my front yard last night. Before I could get out there to shovel it up, a half-dozen l337boys were porting Linux to it.

  119. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by figa · · Score: 1
    I'm glad you mentioned the lack of randomness. I thought it was just me, or that maybe my iPod has specific tastes. I have a full 10G iPod, but the shuffle seems to start with the same four or five albums every time, even after reboots.

    I'd like to see playlists that work by album. I hate building a playlist from albums and then trying to navigate the playlist by song.

  120. Re:Misdirection...initialization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless things have changed alot in the last few months, you need windows or mac osx to initialize the ipod. I supppose that putting Linux in the firmware is overkill, but it addresses the the issue of the lack of Linux/OSS freindlyness in the unit.

  121. Why _I_ would run Linux on an IPod by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1
    IPods are fully functional computing devices in a very small package, and have decent storage. Why wouldn't I want to try to extend it's capabilities while also keeping it's original purpose in tact (listening to music).

    Mind you, an iPOD can do a whole lot out of the box, but why not let it do a whole lot more?

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    1. Re:Why _I_ would run Linux on an IPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the original purpose was not left in tact. It no longer plas music real time, the controls dont work, it doesnt have the calender or notes stuff, or games, etc etc. my point is, enjoy your neutered ipod running a neutered OS

  122. Another way to stream audio wirelessly : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Output the desired audio from the mother computer to an FM transmitter, and use an AIWA FM radio to listen wirelessly.
    Engineered Audio sells a USB FM transmitter, here :

    http://www.engineeredaudio.com/products/aurius.h tm l

    The AIWA is quite a bit smaller than even the mini iPod, and works very well. I've used mine daily for four years. My only complaint is it uses a single AAA, but if you stock up on
    rechargeables, then you just swap batteries out.

    Sharper Image sells the Aiwa, here :

    http://www.sharperimage.com/us/en/catalog/produc tv iew.jhtml?sku=AI065

    Add some Etymotic Research or Shure or Sony earplug-type earphones, and you have a sweet setup.

  123. Troll... WTF? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I'm delaying a purchase of a car for a few months to save up for the iHP-140. It kicks ass up and down the block, let me tell you. It's like the Karma, but a nicer form factor and more robust. Oh yeah, it has a wicked fast USB 2.0 transfer rate (mass storage... simple). So I can do away with all those USB memory keys.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  124. What about dumping from a camera? by msk · · Score: 1

    Say you have an iPod and a digital camera, both of which speak USB. Why not have a way to plug the two together (via gphoto2, for example) and dump the camera's contents to the iPod? Linux on an iPod could be useful for that when a desktop/laptop isn't handy.

    If someting out there already does that, then I apologize for my ignorance on the topic.

  125. Music, yes it can... by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1
    Yes, the IPod Linux project can play music - MP3 files to be precise. And it's running a uCLinux kernel, meaning that more modules can be added. That means the flexability is still to come, but easier to come by now than ever before.

    Unless you have a different understanding of "real time" than I - yes, yes it does play music when you tell podzilla to play music.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  126. Linux on iPaq by blakespot · · Score: 1
    Take a look at the progress of Linux on the Compaq/HP iPaq. Impressive work there as well.


    blakespot

    --
    -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
    iPod Hacks.com
  127. Re:Enough With The... + Some Ideas by ryanwright · · Score: 1

    I also use folders to make a custom nested format which separates songs by language, style, and year. You can't do that with playlists.

    No, that's what id3 tags are for.

    A final plus for me is that browsing by folder avoids using ID3 tags, many of which aren't present on the the thousands of foreign language mp3s I have. The original ipod firmware lists a lot of songs as Unknown for me - I have to play them to figure out what the songs are - how useful is that?

    That's not Apple's fault. Tag your files. The filenames reflect the proper artist & title, do they not? Use MP3 Tag Studio or something similar to create id3 tags from the filenames. It takes all of 5 minutes. Real easy to do and your songs won't be unknown any longer.

    Once you've done this you can use the same program to mass tag any other fields you wish and use those to help you sort it out on the iPod. Example, I have a "techno" folder with several thousand songs. When I initially transferred them to the iPod, a large number had "blues" as the genre. So I batch tagged that entire directory, giving every song the correct genre. Now when I want to play my techno directory on the iPod, I just browse -> genre -> techno. Done.

    --
    -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  128. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by sootman · · Score: 1

    - and cut the delay between consecutive songs to ZERO. I *hate* that pop of silence between two tracks that have a seamless transition, like the one between "A Month of Sundays" and "Sunset Grill" on Don Henley's "Building the Perfect Beast." I would *pay* for that feature.

    Then, add beat-mixing. :-)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  129. Re:for those who have a karma..(Way Offtopic) by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    Well, it seems the BBC is going on the offensive. Apparently Bush is the source of our problems in Nepal. Certainly news to me. I like how there is ZERO mention of the things that the Maoists do. The only time it is mentioned it is when quoting the US ambassador. On the other hand, apparently, the army lines up civilians and kills them. This is certainly sensational stuff certainly far from impartial. Also note the commies have been killing people since 1996..the army just got involved 2 years ago.

    US courts Nepal as anti-terror partner
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/359 3849.stm

    believe what you want about AI or the BBC. Personal opinions dont really alter facts. I think that if your home was raided, your family killed and village burned, you too would see my point of view.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  130. Re:Linux on an iPod? Er, why? by Drakonian · · Score: 1

    Yup, I was thinking that cross-fade would encompass that. On iPod forums, there are a LOT of people that want those two features.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  131. Go with Alpine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.alpine-usa.com/company_info/press_relea se/010804_ipad.html

    info by akis jiouchas (http://homepage.mac.com/accenture/public)

  132. So "pointless"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is a compliment?

  133. What are you talking about? by mfh · · Score: 1

    You want a Jimi Hendrix song and a Jimi/Morrison to be under Jimi Hendrix?

    Put the two songs into a playlist. Organize at your desire.

    Your "MENTAL ORGANIZATION" doesn't need to stop just because you start using ID3 tags. Get over it.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  134. More features... by sorbits · · Score: 1

    I would further like

    • A play-queue (i.e. play this track/album *after* the current),
    • Ability to see a thumbnail of the mp3 (as a sample), especially useful when having to find a particular spot in a track,
    • Remove the 0.2 seconds delay between tracks, at least when the tracks are from the same album -- really spoils a lot of my albums with that stupid pause!

    If only the firmware was open source, but it ain't, so the next best thing is to replace it with one that is...

  135. HAHA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LAST POST bitches! suck on this, l0sers!