Slashdot Mirror


Is Dell Just Testing the Market?

sarig_magik asks: "It seems that Dell is testing the Linux desktop market worldwide, and their choice of desktop is Linspire 4.51. I wonder how Microsoft will view Dell, now? Could this be a real attempt to gain a foothold before any of the other distributors do? We know the hardware vendor, but can anyone comment on the choice of OS?" Although Dell is offering a system with a preloaded Linux Desktop, they aren't doing it here in the US, but through their Italian partner, Questar. While the choice of Linspire as a desktop may leave a few of you underwhelmed, this does seem to be a step in the right direction. Is Dell testing the market? Of course they are. How well do you think they will do?

287 comments

  1. Methinks not by Magada · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It ain't no test, just the usual amount of freedom of movement Dell grant to their partners. Don't look for this to propagate in a top-down manner.

    --
    Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    1. Re:Methinks not by ePhil_One · · Score: 5, Informative
      It ain't no test, just the usual amount of freedom of movement Dell grant to their partners.

      I don't get any of this. Dell's been offering Linux on its servers and Precision Workstations for about three years, partnered with RedHat. Some time ago in the US they created an "N series" line which shipped with no OS, with Linux as an option. Dell has employed developers to work on improving Linux's stability and compatibility. Dell has been very good about Linux in general, even having agents for its Open Manage software that run on Red Hat.

      Admittedly they don't heavily advertise what is really a niche product, but they have http://www.dell.com/linux plus a page that is dedicated to these alternative OS desktops; Their support pages typically have several variation of Linux listed for downloading drivers, etc.

      Seriously, how much Linux support do you want from them? Are you waiting for the Dell guy to announce "Dude, you're getting a Gentoo Dell!"

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    2. Re:Methinks not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely correct. You can buy Linux Dell machines from the following URL.

      http://www1.us.dell.com/content/products/compare .a spx/desktops_n?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd

    3. Re:Methinks not by PowerBert · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Methinks not by madman101 · · Score: 1

      You beat me to the punch. This is only news to people who never look at Dell's site. The fact that a Dell partner in Italy is selling PC's with Linux is hardly newsworthy when Dell has been selling them here in the US direct for some time now.

  2. Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by GuyinVA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like it or not, MS still has a strong hold on the corporate enviroment. While I think it's a good thing that Dell is going this route, it'll only have marginally decent results.

    1. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      MS still has a strong hold on the corporate enviroment

      Otherwise known as vendor lock-in, we didn't like it and have written off our migration costs in order to escape such a situation.

    2. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by metacosm · · Score: 4, Informative

      You downgraded the news from "great" to "ok"... I am going to one up you and mark it "utterly meaningless".

      Why? Because the news is flat out wrong, Dell is not doing anything of the sort, someone who happens to buy computers from Dell is doing it.

      Real Story On It

      I gotta wonder if the original poster on this wanted it to be misleading, or just lacked the ability to google before pushing it over to the slashdot editors.

    3. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gotta wonder if the original poster on this wanted it to be misleading, or just lacked the ability to google before pushing it over to the slashdot editors.
      Oh, be gentle, it's not like the /. writers are known by their ability of getting facts straight.

    4. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by gormanly · · Score: 1
      Dell is not doing anything of the sort

      In this case, they're not. However, Dell have been happily selling me PCs running Red Hat for at least 4 years; first Red Hat Linux, and now Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

      Of course, being Dell, the machines cost more than the exact same hardware running bloody Microsoft, and the partitioning sucks so I always reinstall from scratch, but that's not the point...

    5. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, the original story is completely correct. Dell is installing the OS on the machines that it ships to Questar. I personally worked on imaging process of imaging Linspire to the hard drives for Dell. Dell is installing the OS and plans to roll out these systems to more countries in coming months.

    6. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      So what does it take for an editor to pull a story?

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    7. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by editingwhiz · · Score: 3, Informative
      The two commentaries -- not news stories -- we have published are based on evidence we have uncovered. We have confirmation from high sources directly involved in this story that Dell is assembling Linspire-run computers in Ireland and shipping them wherever they're wanted in the world. Dell did not return our calls for comment last week, when the two columns were posted. We'll be publishing a followup on NF.

      /cp
      NewsForge

    8. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by metacosm · · Score: 1
      • Point #1. They are commentaries, got me!
      • Point #2. I believe you second point is a little off. If you are a Dell VAR (Value Added Reseller), Dell will let you create an image, and they will simply push that image to the hardware. This is something done by many VARs -- now, in this case, it is a little more extreme, totally different OS. Most of the VARs will send in images with like Real Player pre-installed and assorted other small tweaks (a link to the VAR on the desktop, etc). I think trying to play this off as Dell testing the waters, or anything else directly related to Dell is dishonest.
      • Point #3. Can you give me a link on Dell shipping these machines anywhere in the world, again, it was my understanding it was the VARs responsiblity to decide who could buy and where it could be shipped too, and in this case, that means a focus on the EU, but possibly worldwide, but, again it is Questar.


      I look forward to newsforges follow up article to this one, because it seems like you might have your wires crossed.
    9. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by editingwhiz · · Score: 3, Interesting
      We may be talking semantics here. Questar sells the pre-loaded Linux machines. Dell assembles them in Ireland. They are shipped from the Dell factory to wherever the Questar customer is located. Questar, or the customer, may be paying the shipping bills -- I don't know. But the machines begin life in Dell's factory and are moved from there.

      My columns say specifically that you cannot buy one of these machines on a Dell Web site, or in a retail store. That is not a question.

      No wires crossed that I can see. Dell media relations office in Round Rock, by the way, has yet to return two very clear and simple calls from me -- one last week, and one today, asking for explanation. This is their full-time job, to respond to journalists. Normally, companies are very responsive in situations like this. Could it be that the company is wary of talking to me, beause I have confirmed information that it cannot refute?

      /cp

    10. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by editingwhiz · · Score: 1
      Thanks for your post. I already have high-level confirmation of this. You may be able to help clarify this story greatly. Can you please email me at editors@osdn.com?

      Thanks.

      /cp

    11. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Could it be that the company is wary of talking to me, beause I have confirmed information that it cannot refute?

      Could also be you've confirmed (and published) information they can't afford to confirm, not with Microsoft looking over their shoulder. Yeah, MS isn't supposed to retaliate - but would you want to bet your low-margin business against a multi-billion dollar warchest?..

    12. Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great by editingwhiz · · Score: 1
      My point exactly.

      /cp

  3. It's a good start by agraupe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dell (IMO) is a good manufacturer for the "average" computer, and the brand recognition is quite high. I think Linspire is a good choice for a pre-installed distro. Most Linux geeks (who would prefer, say, Gentoo or Debian or whatever) would want to install it themselves anyway. Linspire is a good "first-time" distro, or so I've heard. The people who need the OS to be installed when they buy the computer will like what Linspire has to offer.

    1. Re:It's a good start by tindur · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If some kind of Linux is installed on the box when it's bought it should be trivial to install some other distribution. It probably isn't stuffed with Windows only hardware.

    2. Re:It's a good start by southpolesammy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is very true. While we might view optimization and total control as desirable attributes, the n00b Linux user who is testing the waters outside the Microsoft pool is likely to be overwhelmed by this requirement, and will probably not stay long enough to give Linux a good test drive.

      While Linspire might not be ideal for the hard core folks, it's a good first choice for people who want to find out what all the buzz is about and see what it's like to live in a world free of virii and pop-ups, without having to worry about the administrative overhead of a Debian or a Gentoo install. Let them get comfortable first before suggesting such a quantum leap like that.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    3. Re:It's a good start by agraupe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's a good point. I didn't think about that. Still, I have linux installed on two dell machines (soon to be a third) and I find they don't use Windows-only hardware. I also ran Knoppix on some *really* old dells at school (before the BIOS were password-protected), and they worked fine. Remember that Dell has been offering linux for servers for a while now.

    4. Re:It's a good start by calcfreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. Dell is a pretty well known brand, so many schools use it. A 3rd grader is not likely to know about chrooting, so linspire is a good choice. One day, I was bored enought to watch the Linspire intro video clip, and it was pretty user friendly, although not as power user oriented as Gentoo and Debian are. Besides, its UI is very similar to Windows, so it has a small learning curve.

    5. Re:It's a good start by agraupe · · Score: 1

      That's really what Linux needs to break through in the desktop market. I would have to disagree, though, that Debian is a "power-user" distro. I think it hovers in the middle between beginner and advanced. It still has nice auto-configure tools (if you like ncurses), but it's less of a pure desktop distro (like Red Hat/Fedora. Sorry, but Minimal should mean minimal). I know I may seem like a zealot here, but Gentoo is the REAL power-users distro, IMO.

    6. Re:It's a good start by calcfreak · · Score: 1

      I agree with you too on that Gentoo is a power user distro (I use it myself). What i gleaned about debian was from other users, so maybe I was wrong about Debian.

    7. Re:It's a good start by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      But do you think the average user should be running an operating system that recommends you run as root? AND thinks that setting a password is optional?

    8. Re:It's a good start by agraupe · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that Linspire does that... I would just assume that anyone who distributes a disto wouldn't be quite that retarded. I was wrong. Any distro that recommends you run as root (bad enough) and suggests passwords are optional (egad!) is not doing the F/OSS movement a favor. If you're gonna tell them to run as root, make it quite clear that they need to set a password.

    9. Re:It's a good start by abertoll · · Score: 1

      Maybe. But is it really better than Lycoris, or even Fedora or SuSE? Is it that much easier to use? I guess I'll never touch ever since the whole "sign an NDA to test our software" fiasco with this distro (formerly Lindows).

      --
      "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
    10. Re:It's a good start by RodRandom · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think it's important that Dell is a manufacturer with a big business clientele that could be expected to provide at least an adequate hardware platform. There's a danger that the Linux desktop (Linspire or some other) could become the OS of choice for defective cut-rate boxes, which wouldn't help the reputation at all.

    11. Re:It's a good start by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      The reason why the hardware isn't Windows-only is because it's generally cheap and has been around for long enough for people to get around that Windows-only chipset. That's why Dell computers can do so well with Linux. I know that I have an older self-built machine that I've had for a couple of years that I just installed Fedora Core 1 on earlier this week and haven't had a problem, other than trying to download FC2, which I can't seem to do here with any results (more of an internet connection problem than anything else).

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    12. Re:It's a good start by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The main thing wrong with Linspire is that the default setup causes one to always log in as root. Not a good choice.

      Much better is a distribution that by default logs you in as some normal user, and that makes you jump through a few hoops to do administrative functions. Consider how the Mac implements this. Also consider THAT the Mac implements this.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    13. Re:It's a good start by siriuskase · · Score: 1
      But does it use a Winmodem? it was a drag when I bought my box, installed Linux and discovered that the "modem" I had purchased was simply a goof piece of audio software that was meant to run on Windows.

      If they want to use modem emulators instead of real modems, they should be implemented as mp3 files that can be run on any kind of hardware. And an ethical dealer should know to tell the customer that he is selling a modem emulator instead of a real modem, especially since I asked the dude to install a modem. Pardon the rant, it just seems common sense that if you give the customer something other than what he asks for, you verify with him that the substitution makes sense.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  4. Not Very Well by Gumph · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think Linspire is too unknown/controversial.
    If I was buying a new linux distro, I would go with Either Redhat (known and trusted) or Suse (rising star) not some recently name changed article
    IMHO of course

    --
    'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
    1. Re:Not Very Well by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      unknown/controversial

      There's a combination you don't see every day.

      I'd actually support a subscription model for Linux desktops. You don't necessarily pay for the software. You pay some local guy to come around every Friday to play Bridge and update your software. (He'll bring this week's updates on CD. And he'll happily train your child or grandchild in Linux system administration.)

      Give Linux a friendly face.

    2. Re:Not Very Well by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Redhat (known and trusted)

      I would like to emphasize that the poster most likely meant the distro rather than the company behind it.

      Suse == Novell.

      I would stick with Debian.

      Back to the story:

      Linspire is a great choice. What Dell is testing is not whether its computers work, but whether Linspire on its computers work.
      If I were Dell (which I am not) I would test Linspire and entertain the thought of aquiring it. That way, I could put a useable OS in the machine without paying an OS tax.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    3. Re:Not Very Well by DavidNWelton · · Score: 1

      The thing is, that the number of people who have never bought a linux distribution vastly outnumber those, like you or I, who have. Linspire is after that market, not us.

      I will continue to happily use (and participate in developing) Debian, but think Linspire might work for complete end-user types who are just not interested in what their computer runs as long as it does what they want. I might be more bothered by the non-free aspects if it were aimed at other hackers and developers, because of the networking externalities (don't like to see everything aimed at one distribution), but as things stand, they don't really play on my turf.

      Disclaimer: I've done some work for the folks at Questar and found them to be quite bright.

    4. Re:Not Very Well by z0ink · · Score: 1

      Where's the controversy? They got thrown into court by Microsoft, the ones who claim trademark to Windows and every likeness, and they were pressured to get rid of the name Lindows. I'm by no means a supporter of Microsoft, but making a product that looks and feels exactly like another and even has a simliar sounding product name is wrong no matter what side of the OS fence you're on. I was always tought that two wrongs don't make a right.

      I think this would be a wonderful thing to be launched in the US. Name brands and recognition are what get products sold here and Dell is the Marlboro (McDonalds, Coca-Cola, etc.) of the desktop computer world. If anybody has the power to get the linux desktop market started, because lets face it linux's current market is mainly database and web application, it is most certainly Dell.

      --
      Steal This Sig
    5. Re:Not Very Well by RodRandom · · Score: 1

      If it's unethical to do a look-alike OS, where does that leave MicroSlop, who reverse-engineered DOS from another OS and tried to copy the Mac desktop with the early releases of Windows?

      Fiddle-faddle.

    6. Re:Not Very Well by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      You mean that I could barter with Dell computers when I travel overseas, giving them away with either Fedora or Debian and get massive favors, much like I could with Marlboro cigarettes, buying people a Big Mac, handing them a coke, or slipping them an American one dollar bill? Man, that'd be great work for prostleytizing the Linux movement! Go forth into the world and give people computers!

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    7. Re:Not Very Well by L-Wave · · Score: 1

      Did everyone already forget that Dell previously sold desktop/server machines with Redhat loaded? It last somewhere around a year, and then they dropped supprt for it.

      Do you suppose this is the sme thing all over again?

      --
      I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
    8. Re:Not Very Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was buying a new linux distro

      This is about buying computer (hardware).

  5. Linspire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so does it still run everything as root?

    1. Re:Linspire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck mang your site fucking hurts to look at - if things are so much better and you have more free time why don't you fix your shit.

    2. Re:Linspire by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Just wait 'til it goes wrong, you want to play a game, or watch a movie. Then you'll get exactly what you paid for ;)

    3. Re:Linspire by DarkMavis · · Score: 1

      I play games all the time on Linspire and it works great. Also, I've purchased a licensed DVD player for $4.95 USD and installed it using Linspire's Click and Run. One click later I was watching DVD's legally and without any trouble. Linspire is a GREAT distribution! Have you ever even used Linspire to substantiate your claim that something will go wrong?

    4. Re:Linspire by dave420 · · Score: 1

      OK - try playing videos with strange codecs, or the latest games. You'll experience more troubles than you'll realise. No, I've not used Linspire any time recently, but I've been up to my nuts in other linux distros, and none of them have a central codec system for enabling any AV software on the computer to handle multimedia quite as effortlessly as on windows. I'm not slating Linux, just trying to highlight the fact it has a long way to go, even though most people here won't admit it.

    5. Re:Linspire by DarkMavis · · Score: 1

      Good point, it *is* hard to admit... :)

    6. Re:Linspire by jaywee · · Score: 1

      Does Linspire still run everything under root and not your regular account?

    7. Re:Linspire by ianezz · · Score: 1
      and none of them have a central codec system for enabling any AV software on the computer to handle multimedia quite as effortlessly as on windows

      Well, GStreamer is steadily getting there (this project deserves more awareness also among end users, so that's why I keep posting about it).

  6. Legal problems by shackma2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Maybe Dell does not want to deal with the possibillity of legal trouble by offering Linux in the US. Who knows the contracts that microsoft has over dell.

    Also remember the legal trouble Linspire had when it was Lindows.

    1. Re:Legal problems by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      I know that as of several years ago, dell was offering notebooks that would dual boot into redhat. Not sure whether or not they still do.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    2. Re:Legal problems by ePhil_One · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're right, Dell would never offer Linux in the US.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
  7. For the second? third? time? by shoppa · · Score: 5, Informative
    Dell offered Red Hat Linux circa 2001 along with their desktop machines. We bought several dozen machines this way. Then, of course, this option mysteriously disappeared. (I think it may have only ever been available for corporate customers to begin with).

    Yes, the new option is different. What I see is not so much "testing" but something being there and then disappearing, and then something different being there and disappearing. I'm not going to count on Dell supporting any particular distro, but I think that it is nice to be able to buy a machine without a Microsoft tax.

  8. windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does dell offer full compatibility with windows ? :rolleyes:

    1. Re:windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does dell offer full compatibility with windows ? :rolleyes:

      Which (compatibility) version of Windows?

  9. the REAL question is... by Richthofen80 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Because it comes with the Linux distro pre-installed, is the computer $99 less because it hasn't paid the 'microsoft tax'?

    its a good marketing move to sell to people who don't want to buy / have Windows XP.

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    1. Re:the REAL question is... by Proc6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You think Dell pays Microsoft $99 for each copy of Windows they install?

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    2. Re:the REAL question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An illegal version of Windows will be installed on most boxes sold without Microsoft license anyways. The market share of illegal Windows is much larger than the Linux marketshare.

      So the real question is whether Microsofts efforts at preventing piracy will result in a significant number of those pirated systems being equipped with Linux.

    3. Re:the REAL question is... by Otter · · Score: 1

      No, we've been through this a million times. Dell doesn't buy their Windows licenses at CompUSA, added support costs for desktop Linux far exceed the cost of OEM Windows and the last thing Linux needs anyway is users who hit a checkbox to save a few dollars and then complain because AOL won't work.

    4. Re:the REAL question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No they don't.
      Dell pays Microsoft less than half of that $99 being bandied about here by the ever hpefull Liniux crazies, fr each copy of Windows installed on a PC.
      Plus of course over 90% of Windows installed on PC's in their world countries including China, India and most of Africa is of course pirated, so the so-called Linx cost advantage simply doesn't exist.

    5. Re:the REAL question is... by Pantheraleo2k3 · · Score: 1

      You mean it's a bad thing that AOL wouldn't work?

    6. Re:the REAL question is... by molarmass192 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Plus of course over 90% of Windows installed ... is of course pirated, so the so-called Linx cost advantage simply doesn't exist.

      Ahhhh, now I understand. Hell, if the 3rd world would just steal everything they need then they wouldn't have to live a life poverty. Don't you think that if Microsoft wanted to they could make their OS unpirateable? Activation keys are very close to that, if it wasn't for the no-call-in Corp edition, the option to pirate wouldn't exist at all. In fact, I'd bet that the Corp edition exists with the no-call-in feature specifically to keep the option to pirate open. I know of very few non-corporate users who, if the OS didn't come with their PC, have a valid licensed copy of XP.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    7. Re:the REAL question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      An illegal version of Windows will be installed on most boxes sold without Microsoft license anyways.

      That sounds like some nasty MS FUD, and I seriously doubt it.

      When people build their own machines, there is the significant possibility that they will install an unlicensed copy of MS software on their system. They know the components they want to pick out, and probably have a copy of Win2k or a cracked XP laying around. Buying a full-blown install of Windows would just negate the cost advantage of building your own in an ugly way.

      However, when they are offered an alternative OS in place of MS Windows on a prebuilt system or just buying a prebuilt system without any OS, when the option of having MS Pre-installed is readily available, one can probably expect the purchaser is actually going to install/use the alternative OS and not just install a "pirate" version of Windows.

      Not to be too harsh though- If you're buying a Dell, I doubt you're all that computer savvy anyway. You're better off just getting the model with XP, and playing Slingo on your AOL account.

    8. Re:the REAL question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly. From microsoft's website:

      Order Now
      Full Version
      Microsoft® Windows® XP Home Edition English North America CD
      $199.00

      $99 is already half retail price. If you want to contest this number, you should write the correct amount and a provide a source.

    9. Re:the REAL question is... by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      What I really meant, and I bet I wasn't that clear in my original post, is:

      can i get my pc w/ a free OS alternative? if so, even if I blow the linux distro install away and install my copy of winXP pro which I already own, that would mean I wouldn't have to pay for two OS licenses. So, if my MoBo died and I want a quick and easy replacement PC, can I use my existing license?

      PCs w/o windows licenses can benefit already existing windows customers. FYI I am a windows customer *and* a linux customer.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    10. Re:the REAL question is... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Activation keys are very close to that, if it wasn't for the no-call-in Corp edition, the option to pirate wouldn't exist at all.

      This is simply not true, and you do not know what you are talking about. There are and were activation cracks that would get you out of that problem. It is only easier to use the corporate version, because you don't have to deal with the patches.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:the REAL question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a source for this "less than half" statistic? I wouldn't be surprised if the actual price were even lower than that, but in no way does that absolve you of coming up with your facts via the anal extraction method.

      I wonder how the Business Software Alliance would feel about your new theory that we no longer need to pay for software. Even if piracy is an option for an operation that doesn't have to worry about disgruntled employees, anyone trying to build something more significant will have to fork out cash to Microsoft. "Simply doesn't exist?" The $55B in Microsoft's war chest had to come from somewhere.

      Oh, and learn to spell.

    12. Re:the REAL question is... by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, but you can be sure that Dell charges their customers at least that much for it. Have you ever seen how much Dell wants to add some memory to a system? I was looking at a Dell _once_ until I saw them try to charge me more then double the cost for an extra 256MB of RAM then what I could get it for on the net.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    13. Re:the REAL question is... by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      added support costs for desktop Linux far exceed the cost of OEM Windows
      Just as added support costs for desktop MS Windows far exceed the cost of OEM windows. OEM Windows is not too expensive, it is all the extra software needed to protect it from viruses and malware on top of that the support costs to remove all that garbage from Joe Users windows desktop.
      last thing Linux needs anyway is users who hit a checkbox to save a few dollars and then complain because AOL won't work.
      What would be so bad about that? Maybe if a few thousand users started to bug AOL, AOL would come out with an official AOL dialer for Linux.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    14. Re:the REAL question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every workstation we buy from Dell has a line item: $50 for Windows XP Professional NTFS.

    15. Re:the REAL question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $50 is consistent with what I've heard from the OEMs I work with pay per license (actually, $45-$50 is what I usually hear.)

    16. Re:the REAL question is... by 1000101 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of people who are more than willing to pay double the cost of RAM in order to have someone else install it. Not everyone wants to search pricewatch, make a seperate internet purchase, wait for it to be shipped, and then open something they've never seen the inside of. Sure the prices are high, but you are not their target market.

    17. Re:the REAL question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean it's a bad thing that AOL wouldn't work?

      It is if you think of yourself taking the tech support call.

    18. Re:the REAL question is... by chrismtb · · Score: 3, Informative

      OEM's (and anyone with an OEM windows xp CD) can purchase a certificate of authenticity/ serial number without the CD media/manual for less than $49 online.

      for example:
      Win XP Home COA [nt-micro.com]

      There are plenty of other companies selling them as, well, this was just the cheapest one listed on pricewatch.

      This shows that Dell most likely pays no more than $49 per copy of XP home, since that is the price available to the general public, or at least those who own an OEM install disc. I would venture to guess that DELL has a special deal with M$, where they get an even lower price because of the volume of business they do with M$.

      --
      Break the mindless monotony!
    19. Re:the REAL question is... by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Informative
      Every workstation we buy from Dell has a line item: $50 for Windows XP Professional NTFS

      $50 is the cost to you for upgrading from Windows XP Home (included in the base price of the system) to Windows XP Professional, not the price for the entire OS.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    20. Re:the REAL question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I wouldn't be surprised if the actual price were even lower than that, but in no way does that absolve you of coming up with your facts "

      Wrong again, clown face!
      Its up to the guy who posted the "it costs Dell $99 per copy of Windows" to prove his where he got his figures from , not me.
      The point is already moot anyway. Someone else has already put in a link for the lower OEM prices for Windows.

      "I wonder how the Business Software Alliance would feel about your new theory that we no longer need to pay for software"

      I am wondering the same thing myself, since I most definitely did NOT make any such statement.
      That is entirely a figment of your over active imagination.
      What I did say was simple: Over 90% of software in most third world countries like China, India, Indonesia, Philippines and most of Africa is pirated. This is the FACTS on the ground.
      Given those facts, the Linux being "free" or not is irrelevant. Most people in China buy pirated copies of XP from the street corner for nothing at the same or even lower prices than CD's for Linux.
      That is precisely why Windows has over 90% of the Chinese market.

      "The $55B in Microsoft's war chest had to come from somewhere"

      They do. Mostly from the good old U S of A. Microsoft still makes over 50% of its sales from America, even though America has less than 5% of the world's population, and just 25% of the world's GDP.
      Lets face it, people outside America for the most part (including even old Europe outside of Britain) tend to steal software without the slightest compunction.!

    21. Re:the REAL question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      molarmass192 :"Ahhhh, now I understand. Hell, if the 3rd world would just steal everything they need then they wouldn't have to live a life poverty"

      Another mindless rant from yet another Linux moron!
      Sigh! What's new?
      First of all, stealing software is far easier than say stealing a car ot stealing food or stealing medication.
      All you need is one cd and a few cd-writers and u can crank out copies for anyone in that third world country.
      Try churning out copies of a Toyota sedan or trucks for a 3 rd world country in that manner and see where that gets you! Exactly nowhere!
      Same thing with getting food to a 3rd world country. Its not easy to reproduce either.
      Listen, God is supposed to have given everyone a brain (Even the linux crazies), try using yours, will you?

      molarmass192 :"Activation keys are very close to that"

      Activation keys or no activation keys, its still very easy to pirate Windows XP. Just go to any market street in Beijing and see Windows XP being pirated at will ( I have been there)
      The Linux "low cost advantage" simply doesn't exist in 3rd world countries, since very very very few people actually pay for their copies of Windows XP anyway.
      Windows will continue to rule for the foreseeable future. Period!!
      Get used to it.

  10. A very interesting game of chicken by foidulus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    or maybe in this case I should say penguin *rim shot*
    Anywho, there is probably no way Dell could survive if it invoked the ire of Microsoft and MS refused to sell them licenses(or at least reduced cost ones). However, I think that Dell is pretty confident that MS will not do this unless they REALLY want the anti-monopolists breathing down their neck...
    Maybe then the DOJ could do it's job

    1. Re:A very interesting game of chicken by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      It's not like Microsoft is any position to cut off the worlds leading supplier of desktop computers either. Microsoft NEEDS Dell. Since Microsoft is so dependent on cross-selling revenues (all of the software they sell on TOP of the OS), cutting off a major supplier really isn't an option.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    2. Re:A very interesting game of chicken by foidulus · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that too, cept MS figures that eventually, if they cut Dell off, someone will come to take Dell's place, and they can just sell to them. MS can probably afford a little while of reduced revenues.

    3. Re:A very interesting game of chicken by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Microsoft kisses Dell's ass. Trust me.

    4. Re:A very interesting game of chicken by Orick · · Score: 1

      Haven't they been selling Redhat on servers for years?

    5. Re:A very interesting game of chicken by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Unless someone is named WalMart, then MS is in a world of hurtin.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    6. Re:A very interesting game of chicken by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      You know, I once heard of Walmart planning to sell boxes with Lindows (before the name change) for under $200. But yeah, as much as I hate Wal-Mart, if they were to develop their own line of Linux machines and sell them in stores, MS could be beaten.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    7. Re:A very interesting game of chicken by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it sucks that they only sell them at walmart.com

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  11. Check back in a year by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Presumably, this is more of a test run to work through operational issues (providing Linux support, drivers, etc.). Look for a more serious effort in a year or so. And don't forget Sun, aren't they pushing a Linux desktop now, too?

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Check back in a year by hyperlinx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But Dell already has this experience with regard to providing this kind of support...They sold desktops and Servers not long ago with Redhat installed...this is probably a localized deal with their Italian partner Questar...the MS feelings in Europe are different compared to the feelings in the U.S. and the market in Italy is probably more ripe for such an offer.

      --
      In /.space, no one can hear you SCREAM!
  12. target by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, most people who use linux probably won't buy their system from dell, but probably build it on their own, also, few of us will want to use linspire.

    this is probably targetting the 'newbie' crowd.

  13. Old news ... by supergiovane · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... wrong news.

    --
    Signatures are for stupids.
  14. I have a question..... by theJerk242 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Although Dell is offering a system with a preloaded Linux Desktop, they aren't doing it here in the US, but through their Italian partner, Questar

    Please go easy on me....but why is Dell not doing it in the US?

    --
    Red Bull gave me wings and I flew into the ceiling fan.
    1. Re:I have a question..... by confused+one · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I have a theory. Well, it has several parts...

      1.) Dell is bound by liscense agreements with Microsoft to ship consumer PC's with a copy of Windows installed. (notice I said consumer PC's)
      2.) Dell does ship servers with linux pre-installed to businesses. So, there's no contractual requirement forcing Dell to ship a machine to a business with Windows.
      3.) Dell will ship desktop machines to businesses with FreeDOS installed (they call it the no-OS option). This re-enforces the statement in 2.
      4.) Questar is buying white-boxes with the no-OS option, and intalling Linspire itself. Questar then ships these to consumers. This is a work-around for case 1.
      5.) Dell is testing the waters in Europe. Once they've got the bugs worked out, they'll start shipping machines, under another name, with Linux pre-installed, within the U.S.

      There's nothing to prevent a mom and pop shop from buying white-boxes from Dell today and doing what Questar is doing, inside the U.S. Maybe this is what Dell wants. It's a win-win. They sell machines (albiet not Dell branded) and consumers get machines with Linux pre-installed.

    2. Re:I have a question..... by kidlinux · · Score: 1

      Probably because Italy has a smaller market, which will equate to a smaller user-base for this new system.

      The smaller user-base will make it much easier to recover from a product failure (failure meaning the product doesn't do well, or the product has a lot of problems.) Also, if something does go wrong the news won't be as big since it's in Italy and not the US.

      There may also be more demand in Italy. Personally, I'd predict the US being the last country on earth where we'll really see the Linux desktop succeed.

      --
      -kidlinux.
    3. Re:I have a question..... by pyro916 · · Score: 1

      I don't know who told you they weren't selling here, looks to me like they are! dell.com

    4. Re:I have a question..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I quote"
      Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great (Score:3, Informative)
      by editingwhiz (716337) on Tuesday July 13, @02:30PM (#9688995)
      The two commentaries -- not news stories -- we have published are based on evidence we have uncovered. We have confirmation from high sources directly involved in this story that Dell is assembling Linspire-run computers in Ireland and shipping them wherever they're wanted in the world. Dell did not return our calls for comment last week, when the two columns were posted. We'll be publishing a followup on NF. /cp
      NewsForge "

      Dell is preinstalling Linspire on Dell machines and shipping them to whomever wants them. I work for Dell and we Image thousands of Linspire / Dell machines a month and ship them out all over the world.

    5. Re:I have a question..... by Blackhalo · · Score: 1

      Dell will preinstall whatever a customer (for a fee) wants. The bigger the order, the smaller the fee. In this case Questar is just a large Dell customer and Dell is sending the systems to Questar's customers.

      --
      "There is nothing to do it. But to do it." -Floyd Pepper
    6. Re:I have a question..... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      1.) Dell is bound by liscense agreements with Microsoft to ship consumer PC's with a copy of Windows installed. (notice I said consumer PC's)

      I'm sure the DOJ would love to hear about it, then.

      5.) Dell is testing the waters in Europe. Once they've got the bugs worked out, they'll start shipping machines, under another name, with Linux pre-installed, within the U.S.

      Assuming they decide there will be any customers willing to buy them.

  15. VAR loads Linspire, Dell sells machines... by WizzleWizzleWizzle · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought Dell said they had nothing to do with the VAR that was loading Linspire and selling the PCs in Europe other than selling them machines?

    Story Here

    --
    "I'm a karate man. Karate mans bleed on the inside."
    1. Re:VAR loads Linspire, Dell sells machines... by confused+one · · Score: 1

      That's Dell's story. Dell sells white-boxes to distributor channels and sells Dell branded machines to businesses with Free-DOS installed (they call it the No-OS option).

    2. Re:VAR loads Linspire, Dell sells machines... by value_added · · Score: 1

      I thought Dell said they had nothing to do with the VAR that was loading Linspire and selling the PCs in Europe other than selling them machines?

      Maybe Dell is using the old VAR loading Linspire and sell PCs in Europe trick. After 2 stories on Slashdot it's gotta be true.

  16. Linspire by GTsquirrel42 · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine works for a small computer repair shop that sells a few boxes on the side. He has started playing with Linspire to see how well it works. His idea is to use Linspire as the base OS on lower-end desktops and offer Windoze as an upgrade. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out with Dell doing this too now.

    --
    "I was raised by a cup of coffee" -Homsar
  17. WS3 preinstalled already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company has been buying RedHat preinstalled on Dell machines for years. RH8 & RH9 last year. We just bought 10 360 class machines with WS3 preinstalled.....

    1. Re:WS3 preinstalled already by calcfreak · · Score: 1

      Yeah... COMPANY. Dell sells boxes with RHL on them for only the corporate market!

  18. Linspire ! by [000000] · · Score: 1

    Unless they take one of the "TOP" main-stream Linux OS's like Redhat, Suse, or Mandrake this will be another plop in the pot for the Lunix drive. Why Linspire? rather than say.. "Mandrake"?

  19. Things do Happen... by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 2, Insightful
    These folks -- and there are many -- won't have to deal with partitioning their disks to install the system. They won't have to worry about selecting drivers -- if they know what drivers are. They won't have to go through a tedious installation process. In fact, they won't have to worry about installing a new system, period.

    If they every decide to install new hardware they might. Although I have no idea how often the average Dell consumer actually upgrades their machine instead of just waiting to buy a new one?

    1. Re:Things do Happen... by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you're right. Most people do not have any idea that you even can upgrade a computer. To them, it's like a microwave oven. They use it until it breaks, then they buy another one.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    2. Re:Things do Happen... by mikael · · Score: 1

      I've used Dells at work and at home for about 10 years. The first thing that gets upgraded is always the graphics card (after 6 -18 months; after 2 years, the graphics bus architecture changes, and then the whole system has to be replaced), then maybe a TV tuner card. I did have to add a second CD-RW drive on one system, but that was only because the original system came with a CD-ROM drive. If I had a more recent system, I would have probably replaced the CD-RW with a DVD-RW drive.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:Things do Happen... by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      Where the hell are all these people? I've never met a person who thinks of computers as microwave ovens. Even the biggest neophytes understood that you can exchange components. Same with this 'average user' who finds everything 'too difficult' to the extent that clicking on a red icon makes him/her cry because he/she is used to a blue icon. I've never met one.

      Is this an American phenomenon or something?

    4. Re:Things do Happen... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      >Is this an American phenomenon or something?

      Definitely.

      I've had people tell me that they bought a new computer after their old computer stopped working. Came to find out that the monitor had died.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    5. Re:Things do Happen... by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      Yep. Definitely an American thing.

      The problem is that Americans, by and large, are mindless drones anymore. Granted, those of us with half a brain can make that red icon blue for the morons, just so that they STFU, but I'm not inclined to fix it for them.

      And actually, Americans think of computers more like another television set. Something to turn on when they get bored, instead of actually doing something productive. Yes, we're opulent and lazy. That's why the world hates us so much...that, and the fact that our current foreign policy sucks.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
  20. My Opinion by keybsnbits · · Score: 1

    This is my opinion... and FYI it is not based on facts at all. Although I am personally infatuated with Linux as an OS (as many /.ers are), I am really not sure as to how well a PC preloaded with Linux will do. Price, I'm sure, will be low. This may spur some sales, but I am still doubtful. How many new computer buyers (Dell's audience) actually know about operating systems, let alone Linux? Dell is making a smart move, however, as they are testing the market with a sister company that will not mar the Dell name. This is ingenious, as Dell will not get a bad name if people are unsatisfied with their PCs loaded with Linux. Hell, Dell could go on selling their current PCs, and nobody would ever have known the difference. This is a win-win situation. My final opinion on how sales will be for this Linux desktop: luke warm. Sorry guys. Props to Dell for trying.

    1. Re:My Opinion by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
      Since this is targeted toward the "Aunt Tilly" crowd, if it's set up right, the users will probably just notice that it is different and doesn't get the spyware.

      Until they go to whatever the equivalent of BB is over there and buy some new gadget and wonder why it won't work.

      To really succeed, they would get in the business of selling all sort of hardware gadgets/upgrades themselves, already tested with linspire (that name reeks of marketspeak) and packaged with any needed drivers and a fool proof installer. Then you would produce a positive expierence.

      What I would really like to see is retailers that would cater to linux customers across the board, not just on the low end. Then people would really be offered a choice among getting a windows computer, a apple computer, or a linux computer. Something like that may help accelaerate hardware driver support for devices sold in BB type places.

      When you see someone on here who tried linux and got fed up, 90% of the time it was due to thier computer not being compatible with whatever form of linux they were trying to use. Creating a more mainstream marketplace for "linux approved" products will go some distance in fixing that. At least people will know what to look for. (now I know that one can research such things now, but we're talking about consumers here, they aren't going to do an in depth analysis before going to the store)

      Eh, that was long.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    2. Re:My Opinion by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      How many new computer buyers (Dell's audience) actually know about operating systems

      Considering the number of machines I've seen with HyperThreading running XP Home, not very many.

  21. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell has been selling Linux boxes for a long time, so this is not NEW news.

  22. What Dell could do by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1


    What Dell could do is offer ALL of their machines without the Microsoft tax.

  23. Cornering the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Dells choice of distribution is odd in many way, you can't help but appluad their decision. Pushing Linux is a dangerous proposition for any OEM, especially one who relies so heavily on Microsoft discounts in order to make a profit with such razor thin margins. Forgetting (forgiving?) Dell for Linspire, clearly they are making the sane decision with a bold move to conquor the market now, before anyone else has a chance. They can clearly see the writting on the wall for Microsoft; they expect Longhorn to crash and burn and as any smart company would tell you, they don't want to get dragged down along with Microsoft. Dell know that the smart money is on Linux desktops. It is a growth market, and the trend looks set to continue. At current rates, Linux will totally destroy Apple within the next two years. By the time Longhorn is ready, Linux will have the majority of the market, with Microsoft a pathetic second. Why wouldn't Dell want a peice of that pie?

    As long as Dell can stay the course, we're all set. Longhorn is years off, which at least gives KDE developers enough time to actually fix the horrible cripling usability issues in the KDE desktop. Maybe we'll even see three, maybe four games available!

    1. Re:Cornering the market by Proc6 · · Score: 1
      By the time Longhorn is ready, Linux will have the majority of the market, with Microsoft a pathetic second.

      Give me whatever you're smoking.

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    2. Re:Cornering the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "By the time Longhorn is ready, Linux will have the majority of the market, with Microsoft a pathetic second"

      LMAO!
      One thing one can say about you Linux arnachists, you sure love living in dreamland.
      You guys made that same predictions back in 1996, 1197, 198, 1999 etc etc. By your predctions, Windows was supposed to be a " pathetic second" way back in 2000, then 2001, then 2002, and it goes on!!
      With clowns like you in charge of the open source movement, Microsoft really doesn't have too much to worry about.
      No doubt Microoft's sales and profite are at record levels now, when all Micrsoft has to face is a bunch of Linux Don Quixotes!!

    3. Re:Cornering the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      every day people are getting away from windows.

      watch the articles. 200 desktops here, 500 there, 4000 here.

      that is happening CONSTANTLY. and that ads up quickly. Ford is in the process of switching, 40,000 desktops worldwide. thats just one company.

      one company switching away from windows doesnt mean anything, but when companies are switching in droves as the current climate is reaching, that means a lot.

    4. Re:Cornering the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention that Linux will kill what's left of the BSD market.

    5. Re:Cornering the market by calcfreak · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      First, you should stop flaming and trolling, and realize that probaly over half of the /. community uses linux. Second, Microsoft has so many patches that if Windows was a shirt. it would look like a beggers shirt. Last time I checked, Microsofts sales and profites have been going down. Yes fellow /.ers, I shouldnt have tooken the bait, but I couldnt resist =(.

  24. This isn't Dell's doing by sixteenraisins · · Score: 5, Informative

    The writeup may be a little misleading; Dell isn't the entity behind installing Linspire on these machines, it's Questar:

    A PC dealer in Europe has begun selling Dell desktops equipped with Linux, but Dell emphasized that the systems were customized by the dealer and that this isn't the first time this has happened.

    That article can be read here at Cnet.

    --
    When you're not looking, this sig is in Latin.
    1. Re:This isn't Dell's doing by Phoe6 · · Score: 1

      Dells Blog here has more information on this.
      Clarifying Desktop Linux for Europe You may have seen news stories yesterday about Dell offering Linux on desktops in Europe. To clarify exactly what is being offered and by whom, this news article does a good job. We're always there to support the hardware we sell and at this time you can purchase an n-Series desktop system which will come with no factory installed OS (with a FreeDOS license and CD dropped in the box), but we are not currently factory installing Linux on desktops (with the exception of Red Hat Enterprise Linux on Precision).

      --
      Senthil
  25. Testing the Waters by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worked for Dell from '98 to early '00. During that time they went from "testing the waters" to fairly comitted (with an "apliance" that came in two flavors: Linux and Netware). Then sort of back to testing the waters.

    Now its '04 and they are testing the waters.

    I think that it would be better to say that they are perpetually ready to "go Linux" if and when it makes sense, but MS still pretty much has them by the short hairs.

    -Peter

    1. Re:Testing the Waters by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesn't have Dell by the short'n'curlies - people just don't want to buy linux desktops. it's purely market-driven, not ideology-driven. I mean, linux is the most accessible OS out there. It's everywhere. You can download it from any website, or even get it on a magazine cover CD, yet it has under 2.5% of the desktop share. People LOVE cheap things, yet a COMPLETELY FREE operating system is paling into insignificance. If Linux is the windows-killer as those on /. would have us think, why isn't it doing so well? Look at MP3s - free music. EVERYONE has MP3s. Why isn't Linux enjoying the same success? Clue - it isn't microsoft.

    2. Re:Testing the Waters by pete-classic · · Score: 1
      Microsoft doesn't have Dell by the short'n'curlies


      You are flatly wrong. Appreciate that, at least at the low end, the discretionary discounts that MS extends Dell is approximately equal to the profit on the sale. In other words, if MS decides to only offer its products to Dell at "normal" bulk pricing half of Dell's business disappears. While that business is probably not terribly profitable, it does add a huge number to their volume, which helps to defray fixed (and non-linear) costs.

      In other words, MS could put Dell (yes Dell) out of business on a whim.

      Now Dell moves a lot of their product, so they wouldn't do that. Unless their perception of how much of a threat Linux based systems are grows and their perception of how much of an ally Dell is shrinks.

      None of this has anything to do with the quality (or lack of quality) of GNU/Linux systems, but it does have everything to do with my original post.

      -Peter
    3. Re:Testing the Waters by dave420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Windows XP ships for $200. Dell sells PCs ranging in price up to ten thousand dollars. How are you saying that's MS having Dell by the shorts? I'm not arguing, it's something I can't see. Dell doesn't get commission from Microsoft, which is the only way it can add leverage to its position as sole supplier of the OS. It's not financially possible for MS to cripple dell, short of charging them $8,000 per license, which isn't going to happen ;)

    4. Re:Testing the Waters by SignificantBit · · Score: 1

      Discontinual changes aren't linear. As easy or cheap is to get Linux, the user is confronted with a discontinual change in the way the percive their computers. To use linux isn't free. It has costs of migration, training, etc. One thing is to get a free OS, yet another is using it. That's why people don't just jump at Gentoo or Debian as their first distro: i'm maybe the greatest linux distro out there, but is too discontinual. That's why distros like Lindows o Xandros, or software like Wine are important: they close the gap an make a discontinual process look a little more evolutionary than revolutionary. In a related subject thats also why OpenOffice and Firefox use on the Windows world is also incredible relevant. When most user need is to surf on the web and make a couple of reports, providing a familiar or equal experience on diferents plataforms, make the plataform itself rather irrelevant.

    5. Re:Testing the Waters by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you aren't aware of the size of the discounts that MS extends to its preferred vendors. Or the paper-thin margins that PC vendors operate on.

      Do you really think that Dell pays $200 dollars for the OS on a $494 PC? They probably pay closer to $10. If they jack that up to, say, $50 Dell wouldn't be able to compete in that market any longer. They sell a shitload more units in the $499-$2,000 range than they do $50,000 servers.

      As PC prices come down, and software prices stay the same, or increase, this effect only becomes more pronounced. (Incidentally, Intel does almost the same thing with co-marketing, which is why you can't by an AMD based Dell. That Intel "Ding-dun-dun-do" at the end of practically every PC commercial is the sound of Intel coercing the PC vendor.)

      Incidentally, the versions of Windows that ship on $50k servers do list for several thousand dollars, so the same action on MS part scales. Instead of selling OEM Enterprise Edition to Dell for $100, they might sell it for $500, (still far less than its $4,000 list price) eating a considerable amount, if not all, of Dell's profit.

      -Peter

    6. Re:Testing the Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Instead of selling OEM Enterprise Edition to Dell for $100, they might sell it for $500

      On most servers, Dell sells the OS alacarte, and you either have to negotiate directly with MS/RedHat/Novell or pay list price. Exceptions are crappy "Small Business" configs.

    7. Re:Testing the Waters by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that! So I guess it doesn't scale :-)

      Can anyone blow my arguemnet about the low-end out of the water? AC?

      -Peter

  26. Dell has already clarified this. by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dell is not using Linspire. That is completely the doing of their reseller, and Dell has distanced themselves from Linspire.

    See the article at C|Net from last week on the matter

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Dell has already clarified this. by philmack · · Score: 1

      you beat me to it with that article posting... its not dell, and they are not "testing the water" Also, at work we just got in (one week ago) a dell server that we ordered (two weeks ago) that had redhat installed. straight from our dell representative. no middleman. the IT guy getting the quotes and setting the server up said that there was nothing special about it.. when we were getting the quote they ask "what os do you want loaded?" and we said "the newest enterprise redhat" they said "ok" maybe desktop users who want linux just need to ask.

    2. Re:Dell has already clarified this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wrong:

      I quote:
      " Re:Eh, it'll do ok, but not great (Score:3, Informative)
      by editingwhiz (716337) on Tuesday July 13, @02:30PM (#9688995)
      The two commentaries -- not news stories -- we have published are based on evidence we have uncovered. We have confirmation from high sources directly involved in this story that Dell is assembling Linspire-run computers in Ireland and shipping them wherever they're wanted in the world. Dell did not return our calls for comment last week, when the two columns were posted. We'll be publishing a followup on NF. /cp
      NewsForge "

      Dell is preinstalling Linspire on their systems and shipping them out to Questar. I work for Dell and we ship thousands of systems a month with Linspire pre-installed.

  27. Spyware by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly Dell loaded spy ware onto Windows machines and stopped telling the general public how to remove it... Now then, how will they do this with Linux?

    Once a spyware user, always a spyware user. Theres no reforming in business, just bullshitting more.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Spyware by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      nooooooooo.....

      look here

      Or just go to www.dell.com and look towards the bottom right.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    2. Re:Spyware by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Dell's not alone in this. HP has done it too. There's nothing to prevent a company like HP or Dell from throwing resources at some software development and creating a Linux spyware package. It just hasn't happened yet (that you know of).

  28. It's not Dell that offers the machines!, by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to this, Questar is just a reseller, not a partner. From the article:
    Questar is simply buying Optiplex 170L desktops from Dell as might any other business or individual customer. Is there any thing more to their "agreement" than that? No, Dell told The Register today: "Questar is a direct Dell customer and that is the extent of the relationship."

  29. No partnership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell is not testing the water. Dell is not shipping Linux PCs. Questar is not a Dell partner.

    All that is happening is that Questar is buying Dell PCs at full sticker value just like anybody else and sticking Linux on it. No story here folks, time to move on.

  30. Dell refuted this last week ! by johnhennessy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought Dell distanced themselves from this last week, claiming that third parties can load whatever OS they want onto their hardware.

    This WOULD be news if Dell was offering Linux support along their Windows support, but a third party that buys a Dimension/Optiplex and sells it with Linux really isn't ground breaking news.

    --
    [ Monday is a terrible way to spend one seventh of your life. ]
  31. Comment of OS? by amitupadhyay7 · · Score: 1

    "We know the hardware vendor, but can anyone comment on the choice of OS?"

    Yes I can. It is linux.

  32. Do They WANT To Fail? by bfg9000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... I've tried L'Inspire (apparently some sort of French Linux distro) when my buddy bought it. It was nice, in a mindless sort of way, but within a week of using it I formatted my HD and reinstalled Debian. The stupid limitations of Linspire got irritating real fast. If Dell's testing the waters, they won't get an accurate result using Linspire, because Linux geeks will be the first to buy a Linux CD when offered the choice of Win vs. Lin. Only later will regular users start to choose Linux.

    Maybe Dell WANTS to fail, to justify future lack of Linux support. Because I can't see this being successful. Especially because they will undoubtedly have various devices that don't run under Linux -- modem, wireless card, etc. Until the hardware is 100% supported, Linux won't make inroads with the common man. And until they ditch Linspire, they won't make inroads with geeks.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    1. Re:Do They WANT To Fail? by confused+one · · Score: 1
      Linspire is Lindows. They changed the name to in an attempt to throw off the lawsuits brought on them by Microsoft.

      Linspire has those limitations because it's designed for a linux newbie, maybe even someone who's never used a computer before. If you're an experienced linux user, you won't like Linspire.

  33. Re:For the second? third? time? by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yeah, I was wondering if I was the only one old enough to remember the 20th century. Remember when every big PC vendor was announcing some partnership with a Linux startup? Dell and Red Hat! HP and Eazel! Compaq and Ximian! Dell and Eazel! HP and Ximian! Pretty much nothing came of it -- so little, in fact, that these new stories are reported with "The unthinkable has happened!"

    Anyway, to answer the submitters question: Dell doesn't sit around trying software until they find something they like and want to ship. Partners come to them and pitch deals to them. If Dell (or their hardware partner) is going with Lindows it's because Michael Robertson made them a deal they couldn't refuse. It's that simple.

  34. Paranoia mode by vectrex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) Dell is friend with Microsoft
    2) Microsoft has some serious security issues
    3) Microsoft has no clear "target" to say, "hey Linux too has security issues"
    4) Microsoft ask Dell to start shipping Linux
    5) ...but make sure they use a really lame, unsecure distro (everyone is root!)
    6) Microsoft steathly release an exploit/virus/whatever that target Dell's Linux machines
    7) voila! Bingo! Next on CNN, "Linux is target of a mass viral infection! Microsoft has the solution!"
    8) A page show up on microsoft.com talking about how Linux is bad, etc...

    Really, it makes sense...

    OK, I'll put back my foil hat now. Kthxbye.

    1. Re:Paranoia mode by mirko · · Score: 1

      Please, make that the end of your conspiracy theory !
      Read the other posts and you'll see that this is in no way related to Dell : Questar ius just buying Optiplex from Dell and installing Linux on these, but Dell doesn't especially endorse this.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    2. Re:Paranoia mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You overestimate the willingness of the average user to switch OS's just because "the experts" say it is insecure. The average Windows computer now is chock full of spyware and susceptible to viruses and exploits, and as near as I can tell, MS's market share hasn't been hurt. I suspect this plan of yours would stall out with an increased number of people happily and obliviously using linspire, ignoring MS's warnings.

    3. Re:Paranoia mode by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      The problem with that scenario is step 7a:

      7a) Numerous tech-savvy reporters point out that it's only Dell's Linux that's affected, and that Redhat, Suse, Mandrake, Gentoo, Debian, &c are completely untouched.

      IMHO Microsoft are going to need a lot more than one failed Linux distro to overcome the embarrassment of having CERT and Homeland Security publically state: "don't use Internet Explorer because it's complete crap"...

    4. Re:Paranoia mode by fritz1968 · · Score: 1

      you forgot ...

      9) Profit!!

      --
      It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
    5. Re:Paranoia mode by thenightisdark · · Score: 1

      "Numerous tech-savvy reporters"
      Where are these tech-savvy reporters now? Point one out! think back to the last MS bash fest... why did not a single reporter even meantion OS?

      --
      Piracy is Adam Smiths invisble hand fisting you in the ass, Mr. Gates. - MightyMartian (840721)
  35. Maybe Xandros? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should use Xandros? It is just as easy to use as Linspire and they also have a business desktop with a desktop management server to make for easy deployment and management. SuSE/Novell may also be a good option if they come out with some type of management for easier deployment. While Red Hat has a great server, they have no real integration for management or deployment of business desktops, so I don't think they are a good option for the enterprise right now.

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  36. Re:For the second? third? time? by Polkyb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dell still do offer a RedHat solution here in the UK, but, only for the server market. You cannot get Linux on a desktop, however, they have recently started shipping desktops with FreeDOS, so you don't HAVE to buy Windows

    --
    I've never shoed a horse, but I once told a donkey to piss off!
  37. Trying too hard to cross-market by TheTXLibra · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think they're trying too hard to cross-market. If they would just release a line of machines with actual LINUX/UNIX on it, rather than something vageuly LINUX powered but Windows-shaped, they might actually do a lot better.

    My problem with Linspire is that it attempts to cater to people too stupid or lazy to learn how to use Linux, but want to show off how anti-Microsoft they are by not buying a Windows OS. Now, this may not be the case, it could just be my perception, but it seems that if someone is going to use an entirely GUI-based OS, they should stick with Mac or Windows and accept it.

    Now, me personally, I'm a Windows user. Not because I'm too stupid to use Linux (in fact, I used to do tech support for it), but because my career depends on their support, and using it at home keeps me current in the field. But after years of supporting users who have inadvertantly screwed up their system by clicking the wrong things at the wrong times, I really respect Linux for the mere fact that you CAN'T screw it up unless you know what you're doing. It seems like Linspire is just going to add this problem to Linux when it doesn't need to be there.

    --
    -The Libra
    "Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
  38. Dell still sells Linux by grunt107 · · Score: 1

    Although hidden under the 'small business' banner, and never on the cheapest PCs, DellPrecision 450n/650n offers RH workstation rlse v.3. It seems Dell's bargain w/MS was to not directly market consumer grade PCs (yet).

    1. Re:Dell still sells Linux by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Yes, and you can get the cheapest PC's with no operating system (ships with FreeDOS)

  39. Round #2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the second time Dell has attempted to sell consumer desktops with Linux. The first run failed miserably from a sales standpoint. I doubt this one will do that much better, but at least they chose a more appropriate market.

  40. Re:For the second? third? time? by chris_mahan · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can buy the machines without os (or rather, the DrDOS OS) from their website.
    Dell.com | Small business | Destop | N-series Desktop

    (http://www1.us.dell.com/content/products/compar e. aspx/desktops_n?c=us&cs=04&l=en&s=bsd)

    I have bought some, and they work great.

    PS: I never though I would be posting, on /., instructions on how to buy Dells.

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  41. Dell can't make up their mind what the deal is by One+Louder · · Score: 1
    According Forbes, Dell has flip-flopped on the issue - again.

    Now apparently the story is that they *are* installing the OS and shipping the systems on behalf of Questar.

    1. Re:Dell can't make up their mind what the deal is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you place a big enough order from Dell, they'll install whatever disk image you give them. The point is that Dell isn't sticking it's neck out here.

    2. Re:Dell can't make up their mind what the deal is by editingwhiz · · Score: 1
      Thanks for your post. But Dell hasn't flip-flopped on this.

      Like many companies in tight spots, it simply does not tell the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. It should, but it doesn't have to. This isn't a courtroom. Organizations always manage the information they choose to divulge, risking their own credibility with each statement. Journalists know this and factor it into the information mix. And readers choose to believe what they want to believe when they read the final report. Most of the time, the truth eventually filters through.

      We at NewsForge and ITMJ simply research and publish IT information -- when we are satisfied that it is complete and useful to our readership.

      /cp NewsForge and ITMJ/a>

  42. RedHat Missed Opportunity by mslinux · · Score: 1

    If RH hadn't dropped "RHL" in order to "focus on the enterprise", they'd be in a position to make tons of money with hardware partners such as Dell just like Microsoft does!!!I rant about RHL being EOL'ed constantly, but I still can't believe they did it. It will go down as the single most stupid OSS managment decision of all time. RH had mindshare, they had the grassroot Linux movement... hell they were Linux in the USA. They threw all of that out the window.

    1. Re:RedHat Missed Opportunity by mbottrell · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of Fedora or even RHEL for that matter?

    2. Re:RedHat Missed Opportunity by mslinux · · Score: 1

      Sure... one is for geek hobbyist and the other is for corporate CIOs... where's the one for the average desktop/home user???

      RHL was sold to average desktop/home users through Dell (for a time) and at retailers like Office Max. Today, neither of these two things are happening. RH created a vaccum by EOL'ing RHL... Linspire and other *previously* unheard of, unknowns are filling the void.

    3. Re:RedHat Missed Opportunity by mbottrell · · Score: 1

      Fedora != geek/hobbist... It's a community based distro... that has RHat overseeing it...

      You might wanna take a look at it...
      It's slicker than any RHL version was... I know plenty of first time Linux users using Fedora...

      Get over the whole RHL... it's gone... and I'm glad it has... Fedora has already left it for dead... :)

  43. Re:For the second? third? time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell still sells Linux Workstations -- pricy machines with pro video cards and SCSI. These are aimed at the same market as Sun.

  44. Dell Has Been Offering Linux For Ages by turgid · · Score: 1

    The last time I bought a server and workstations from Dell, I asked for a quote with Windows and with Linux. Linux was more expensive. I asked the salesman why. He said, "Because Linux is more expensive than Windows." You can get Linux for nothing. He wouldn't sell the machines to me without an OS, "because of their agreement with Microsoft." I retorted that the agreement was not legal, and had been ruled as such in court. He replied, "Oh yes it is. I used to work for Microsoft."

    1. Re:Dell Has Been Offering Linux For Ages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get an OEM quote from Microsoft and RedHat, and see who is cheaper....

      Also, Dell has worked around their MS agreement by selling "FreeDOS" (really bare) machines. If you think the agreement is illegal, take it to the judge.

    2. Re:Dell Has Been Offering Linux For Ages by turgid · · Score: 1
      The point was, the salesdroid gave me the excuse that the reason for the agreement was to "prevent piracy," i.e. they wouldn't sell bare machines because that leads to software piracy. presumably of MS "operating systems."

      Needless to say, one can legitimately obtain several Linux distribtions for free and install them on as many machines as you like.

      The other thing that this broken Microsoft logic also fails to consider is that Linux and Windows are not the only operating systems that run on x86 hardware. How dare Dell and Microsoft accuse me of intent to pirate software, and how dare they assume that I don't already have ligitimate licenses for operating systems for those machines, or that I don't already have the right to use other software.

      The only problem is, the market has become so consolidated that Dell was the best quote on price and service, despite the Microsoft tax. Something is wrong here. The Free Market has broken down. That is the point of the Anti-Trust cases. How dare Microsoft exert such power over us.

      FreeDOS was not an option at that time. I'm sure M$ wouldn't have been pleased if Dell had sold me a 4-way Pentium 4 Xeon with 8 gigs of RAM to run FreeDOS anyway....Surely Sir must require some incarnation of Windows 2000 or whatever they try to foist on servers nowadays.

  45. Im not so sure by jford235 · · Score: 2, Informative

    whats so great/new about this. You can get OS-less PowerEdge 400SC starting around $250(with instant and send-in rebates).

  46. Linspire by rogerborn · · Score: 2, Informative

    I switched from Windows to Linspire and it is a good change for me. It works like Windows, but it seems to have a lot more features than Windows did.

    I lost a lot though. No more unannounced updates by M$. No more virii attacks. No more trojans that take over my computer and trash my workday.

    I am a writer, so I used Office, plus I used Photoshop and ran a website, cut CDs for my music, etc. - all the standard stuff most people use.

    Linspire had a matching free app for all that I do, and it came loaded with the distro, which was a painless install. I could even access all my old data files.

    I would never go back again, and why should I have to? All my documents are compatible with M$ files and the clients I work with cannot tell the difference. I can. I have a lot more free time since I don't continually have to muck with my computer because of Windows!

    Linspire is my first encounter with Linux. I hear it isn't even the best version, but I am completely happy with it.

    Roger Born
    writing.borngraphics.com

  47. Why not Red Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was kind of disappointed when Dell announced these machines - I'm hoping that they'll move to a better distro in time. Fact is I, like lots of people who run small businesses, use Dell hardware because it is pretty good, pretty cheap, and the after care is excellent. However getting Linux working on said hardware is generally a pain in the proverbial. The weird thing about the choice of Linspire/Lindows/Lin--- is that Dell had been quietly supporting Red Hat on their machines for ages linux.dell.com

  48. Lindows/Linspire is a good choice for end users by stm2 · · Score: 1

    Lindows has Click'n Run that let users install Linux programs without recompile, without dependency issues and all under a nice GUI.

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  49. Good start? Why was RH not? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    While we might view optimization and total control as desirable attributes, the n00b Linux user who is testing the waters outside the Microsoft pool is likely to be overwhelmed by this requirement, and will probably not stay long enough to give Linux a good test drive.

    I agree with this assessment, for the average non-techie home user, Lindows is probably fine, and once they get a grip on it, may feel more confident about moving on the a "real" Linux distro. But...

    I never found my first Linux distro, RH8, difficult at all, technically. The graphical installer didn't seem any more challenging than Windows, and when it was done, everything was there: browser, OpenOffice, games... What's the big deal?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's because you were a windows user before.
      Now imagine someone who has never had a computer. (6 billion people minus 600 million computers still leaves 5.4 billion people (and that's not taking into account the fact that many americans/europeans use one at work and one at home))

      Is that person going to be OK with linspire?

      What if there were 600 million linspire users out there? you know, in the same vein as "there are 40 million AOL users out there".

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    2. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by really? · · Score: 1
      The graphical installer didn't seem any more challenging than Windows, and when it was done, everything was there: browser, OpenOffice, games... What's the big deal?



      Err ... you are not a typical Joe Sixpack?

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    3. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      Actually, Red Hat and SuSE would be fine as well. They are fairly easy to work with, and allow the user to get comfortable as well, while keeping the dirty parts contained and controlled to keep the support fairly innocuous.

      My guess is that the choice of Linspire had more to do with the higher TCO including support that Dell would have to pony up and pass on to the customer if RH or SuSE were chosen. I can imagine that having to buck up like that might be more damaging to people's desire to try out Linux than the benefits gained from using it.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    4. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Err ... you are not a typical Joe Sixpack?

      More or less, don't know why not. I have a low tolerance for convoluted technical crap, and I drink cheap American piss-water. What I said was the RH8 graphical install was not much different than the Windows install, problem wise. So, what I'm saying is that if you don't have problems with Windows install, the RH8 graphical install should not bother you either...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    5. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      My experience has been that people who have never used windows before have an even easier time taking to linux distributions than people who used to use windows. Instead of adapting your ways, you're learning fresh...

      This may be different with the recent move to have mainstream distros look and (ugh) act more like windows, but I doubt it. Before there was windows people managed to learn how to use computers. People can be pretty smart when they want to be.

    6. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Actually it would seem to me that using one of today's distributions for a complete newbie would be the ideal tradeoff.

      The learning curve shouldn't be any greater than with Windows, there is a community out there willing to help, and you don't have any preconceived notions about "that goes where and does things how?". Clean slate.

      Linspire is specifically trying to be very Windows-like and includes things that a 1st time user might not -need-. Xandros as well. Sun's Java Desktop System does this but to a lesser extent.

      The biggest problem you would have would be "my friend wants me to (play X|use Y|do Z)" and having X,Y or Z be a windows-only program. But you'll have that problem with all distros to some level.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    7. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by JDevers · · Score: 1

      Right off the bat though, the average user couldn't install WINDOWS. I think about 30-40% of the average users, which account for 90% of the tech calls, don't really understand the disk/folder/byte paradigms. They call the PC the hard drive and the monitor the computer. That type of person could NEVER install an OS without massive handholding. How would they partition the disk? On a brand new PC it wouldn't be so bad, just use the default which isn't a great idea if you are dual-booting into Windows though.

    8. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Insightful
      My experience has been that people who have never used windows before have an even easier time taking to linux distributions than people who used to use windows. Instead of adapting your ways, you're learning fresh...

      Pretty much the same could be said of any computing system - including acknowledged crap like MVS. Nobody claims that the mainframe o/s like MVS are ideal any more, but ten years ago there were still people arround who had never used anything else and thought that the MVS way of doing things was perfect.

      Linux is essentially architected the same way a modern mainframe O/S are architected. You have a reasonable user interface that is connected to a terrible one via pushrods. All the work gets done by the cruft underneath, which does not matter much most of the time, but when something goes wrong you have to start fiddling with the engine.

      Windows has a unitary design that is much closer to the way a car is designed, in windows the UI is the O/S, there is no underlying layer, most users never look at the registry, let alone start editing it.

      From a pure architecture perspective the Windows approach is the right one, there is much less to go wrong. With Linux you have two places where things can go wrong, the O/S itself or the pushrods holding up the UI. This means it is much more likely something would go wrong, but if something does go wrong you have a lot more visibility into the problem and it is more likely that you can fix it - if you know what you are doing.

      The last part is the kicker as far as being a real new computer user goes. It is very easy to learn UNIX if you have a large support community who can get you out of trouble, if you are at university or whatever. If you don't have that support structure you are not going to do UNIX for very long if there is an alternative.

      Back in the early 90s the incentive for learning UNIX was that you could buy two SUN sparcstations for less than the cost of a slower VMS box. So it was worth putting up with the poor documentation and user interface. Today I just don't see the incentive, even though Linux is a major advance on SunOS or ULTRIX, the improvement there is nothing like the improvement of Windows over VMS.

      Despite the claims made about OSS and innovation the fact is that in the last ten years the OSS movement has not done much more than write a copy of a 1970s O/S and layer on a 1980s window system.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    9. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Linux is essentially architected the same way a modern mainframe O/S are architected. You have a reasonable user interface that is connected to a terrible one via pushrods.

      That is the biggest pile of misunderstanding and innaccuracy I've heard this week.

      Do you have some crazy notion that graphical applications on Linux all manipulate commandline equivalents behind the scenes? That's just not the case. A graphical application on Linux is pushing all the same buttons and manipulating all the same data behind the scenes as the windows version, just with different APIs. There's no fundamental difference between the way a database application, a spreadsheet, or a word processor works between the two systems, and there's certainly no "work getting done by cruft underneath".

      Perhaps you were only speaking of configuration? Well guess what. For the most part you're still wrong. Interface and application configuration differs between the two only in encapsulation and storage methods. Arguably, both methods have advantages, but neither of them are really "cruft".

      From a pure architecture perspective the Windows approach is the right one, there is much less to go wrong.

      Once again, bullshit. In fact there's so much *more* that can go wrong, since the registry model allows for the possiblilty of corruption of all system configuration data through one rogue application, and the essential lack of separation between administrative permissions and the default user in most installations allows for endless and easy methods of destroying your system... either by accident or through the introduction of malicious code.

      but if something does go wrong you have a lot more visibility into the problem and it is more likely that you can fix it - if you know what you are doing.

      Now you're just being funny... That was sarcasm, right? You have visibility into how windows works behind the scenes? There's detailed logs? You can debug individual components independant of the whole system? You can look at the source to see what's going on, were you so inclined?

      I'd go on, but I've fed the trolls enough today.

    10. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      That's because you were a windows user before. Now imagine someone who has never had a computer.

      It's not that easy to escape Windows. If you go to a bookstore, most of the books on the shelf will probably be about the Windows OS and its applications. For every book on GIMP there are probably ten or twenty on Photoshop. Even books that are not specifically about Windows can have subtle Windows dependencies, like instructions on installing the accompanying CD-ROM, etc.

      To make matters worse, many key open source software products evolve so quickly that many books are quickly rendered obsolete.

    11. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by tanguyr · · Score: 1

      Right off the bat though, the average user couldn't install WINDOWS.

      Very true - and most never have to, because their computer came with XP home pre-installed, hence the excitement over this headline (since proven as misleading). In fact, i'll go one better: the average user doesn't know what OS they're running - go ahead and ask, i bet at least one will say "Office 2000".

      I've been playing with the Suse 9.1 Live Eval lately, and i think anybody who is comfortable installing/reinstalling/generally messing about with windows isn't going to have any problems with Linux either. Trouble is that's not that many people.

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    12. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Do you have some crazy notion that graphical applications on Linux all manipulate commandline equivalents behind the scenes?

      Hey I wrote plenty of UNIX and VMS application code. A word processor is not a thin layer over legacy code (unless we are talking about emacs), but pretty much all the 'GUI' operating systems utilities are.

      And if you bothered to read what I wrote you will see that I had said that the UNIX model is the one that gives greater visibility if something goes wrong. the only downside being that the greater visibility is useless unless you already know what you are doing. UNIX sure as heck ain't going to do anything to help you.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    13. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1

      Linux is essentially architected the same way a modern mainframe O/S are architected. You have a reasonable user interface that is connected to a terrible one via pushrods. All the work gets done by the cruft underneath, which does not matter much most of the time, but when something goes wrong you have to start fiddling with the engine.

      Heh... car metaphors. If this were a different forum, you might very well start an OS flamewar.

      I guess the truth is, to a certain extent, linux does have a terrible interface. The console stuff isn't really all that bad, although it's a different metaphor than most Windows users are used to. No, I think the main problem is really X-Windows.

      You might expect X to provide some kind of rudimentary desktop manager functionality. Some kind of file browser? A start menu? Hell, even a button labelled "help?" Nope, that is left up to "third parties" like FVWM, MWM, and KDE. As a consequence, there is really no standard way of doing *anything* on the linux desktop.

      Now, I know some people will say, who cares? You can install a desktop manager if you want. But, of course, the truth is, that's not the same thing. GNOME and KDE are not built in to X-Windows the same way microsoft's GUI is built into its OS.
      For one thing, it introduces a needless layer of abstraction, which adds bugs and performance problems. For another thing, it's not standard. That means it's going to be more difficult to get help when you need to do something.

      For example, let's say I want to edit my /etc/fstab, using some kind of GUI system. Now, I could go online and fetch a 3rd party program to edit this file. Why 3rd party? Because, unlike Windows, linux comes with no standard software to do this task. Now, once I have the GUI program, I will need to learn how to use it... which takes time and effort. Most likely, I can't ask my friends, because they will probably be using different tools. There is no *standard* way.

      Except, of course, editing the file with a text editor, which is what everyone in the linux scene eventually learns to do. It is much easier than navigating the non-standard GUI tools.

      Now that we've established just how little X-windows actually provides (besides a frame buffer and a client-server system for drawing windows on the screen), let's talk code quality.

      Like the Matrix, you cannot understand how truly crappy the x-windows API is until you have experienced it. I have had this privilege (?), since I was hired to improve performance of an xwin app.

      First of all, X provides only the most minimal functionality imaginable. There is no native support for dialog boxes, scroll bars, or buttons, or... really anything. Naturally, this makes for massive inefficiency, as people scramble over themselves to re-invent the wheel. A lot of toolkits have sprung up to fill the void. Of course, this is just another unecessary layer of abstraction for bugs and inefficiency to hide in.
      Considering that we are also using a non-standard "windows manager" (like sawfish) and probably a "desktop manager" (like gnome), we have at least 4 different APIs involved for the simple task of drawing a window on the screen.

      This is not good, folks. Even the non-programmers among you should smell this by now.

      Even a simple "hello-world" application written in X-Windows takes 3 pages of code. The horror, the horror. To actually do anything useful with it, directly, is a nightmare. Imagine function calls that take five or six pointers to structs. Imagine a system created by people who had no concept of "user interface." Imagine a *giant* C program written by mediocre programmers from academia, with little or no attention given to refactoring.

      That's X-Windows.

      This may offend some people here, but I believe that even the win32 API is better than this MIT-spawned horror. If ever the open source community could get together the resources to replace this altar to satan, it would doubtless improve people's per

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
    14. Re:Good start? Why was RH not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A word processor is not a thin layer over legacy code (unless we are talking about emacs), but pretty much all the 'GUI' operating systems utilities are.

      All you're essentialy doing here is showing that your understanding of linux and how the majority of linux desktop environments work is limited to how things were in the late '90s. Welcome to the future.

  50. This story is total BS by Brian+Blessed · · Score: 4, Informative

    It seemed obvious that something was wrong with this story the first time it was discussed on /. because there were no links to Dell.

    The Register confirms that this move has little to do with Dell:
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/07/dell_vs_qu estar/

    - Brian.

    1. Re:This story is total BS by pyro916 · · Score: 1

      Here is a link for you, hey look you can get Red Hat on your workstation here in the US.

    2. Re:This story is total BS by editingwhiz · · Score: 1
      Just because a story -- in this case, a pair of columns -- doesn't have links to all possible sources doesn't mean something's wrong with it. Dell did not respond to my phone and email messages for comment, last week and earlier today. That's their choice. Nobody can force them to talk to a journalist.

      Read the latest posts on this topic and you'll see the truth is starting to emerge.

      /cp

  51. Dell better pull their weight by Himring · · Score: 3, Funny

    They need to get back on track and help contribute to that 1 billion windows installs. We'll never make that 2010 deadline if they keep this shit up....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  52. /. users can be hypocrites by DarkMavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd like to know how many /. users have acutally used Linspire/Lindows. It seems to me that there is a large negative cloud that follows this distribution but the cloud isn't substantiated by actual use. The main negative issue that seems to always come up is the "runs as root" issue. Well, that's been resolved. When you first log in, you can choose to create a user other than root. Plus, look at the bigger picture. Linspire is designed with the END USER in mind. Not your typical linux user who likes to re-install their system frequently or likes to wrestle with dependencies when installing applications. I've been using Linspire since last November. It hasn't been perfect but I'll tell you, it's been the best linux distro I've ever used. The combination of a Dell system and an easy-to-use DESKTOP linux distribution is win-win. Heck, any PC being sold with linux preloaded is a win for the open source community. Remember, it's not a competition between linux distros, it's a competition between Linux, MacOS, and MS Windows.

    1. Re:/. users can be hypocrites by grunt107 · · Score: 1

      I have played with most Linux distros at one point or another, and Lindows was OK. If it weren't for the cheapo Walmart offering JDS, it would probably be the one I chose for the grandparents to use. As you stated it was easy to use - not everyone needs 4 browsers, 5 coding languages, 6 text editors, a web server, etc. The only distro I was unimpressed with was Turbo Linux (caldera owned @ the time).

    2. Re:/. users can be hypocrites by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look - it's /. Any OS that isn't the exact distro each user has will get slated for no real reason, because "it's not what I use". Windows gets bashed for lots of stuff that hasn't been true for 5 years, as does Apple. /. is intrinsically prejudiced, and we have to remember that when talking about ANYTHING here :)

  53. Feedback loops by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Loop 1
    1. Microsoft selected which OEM makers would be allowed steep discounts on its bundled software for about the last decade.
    2. This pruned the small, Mom & Pop OEMs, speeding up the process of a few bigger industry members becoming dominant.
    3. Even though Microsoft generally did business with all the remaining larger OEMs, raising the threshold startup costs for new competitors entering the market made the competition one limited to the existing ones, which helped trigger and speed up the OEM shakedown that has left Dell in a dominant position.
    4. Dell, being number 1, becomes powerful enough to push back at Microsoft, at least a little.
    5. Micosoft profits fall as they have to cut a better deal with Dell.

    Loop 2
    1. Microsoft delays production of Longhorn and other software repeatedly.
    2. Newer, faster computers not needed to run newer, bigger programs.
    3. Industy wide OEM sales become sluggish, Dell doesn't have the profit margin to push very hard at Microsoft, but Microsoft can't afford to gouge Dell with the whole industry tepid.
    4. If Microsoft succeeds in selling bigger, shinyier software that raises OEM sales numbers, Dell gains more power to break away. If Microsoft fails, Dell sales become flat, with no margin to be shaved off to increase MS profits.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  54. Marketing opportunity? by travail_jgd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the first big vendor[1] to properly commit to shipping Linux-based systems has the opportunity to make a killing.

    Anyone can sell a cheap x86 box (Windows or Linux) to Joe Sixpack.

    The first big vendor that offers a complete Linux system can really rack up the profits. By system I mean modem, networking, scanner and printer. The vendor would be in a position to (somewhat) honestly claim "if you don't buy from us, good luck getting it to work." Reinvest the MS-tax in Crossover Office, so they can advertise compatibility with Office, Photoshop, etc[2].

    [1] Big == national, with an advertising budget to reach non-geeks.

    [2] Having Office compatibility makes switching to Linux easier to swallow for Joe Sixpack -- even if he never uses it.

    1. Re:Marketing opportunity? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Reinvest the MS-tax in Crossover Office, so they can advertise compatibility with Office, Photoshop, etc.

      Note also that Crossover would cost much less than the MS tax, even if the list price of Crossover isn't that much lower. A vendor like this could either negotiate much lower prices on Crossover, or just offer Crossover as a free download later for the customers that actually need it. Since very few people who buy a bargain home PC will ever actually shell out the cash for a copy of Office (heck, most won't realize that OpenOffice.org *isn't* Office), Crossover costs should be very, very low.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Marketing opportunity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are still several problems, big and huge, which make the "Linux" desktop less user-friendly for corporate environments or Joe Sixpack. Until these are solved the adoption will remain slow.

      THEY NEED TO BE FIXED.

      One of these is compatibility. People want their audio, video, image applications on their desktop. They want it as fast as they can get it for a cheaper/same hardware point of view. They don't want a clone, they want the Real Thing (tm). GIMP, Ardour or WINE + PS just don't cut it.

      Another one is hardware management on which HAL and DBus are progressing. They want to see when their hardware is connected and want to access it easily. Windows does this, but Linux not yet minus some ugly, half-working hacks.

      These are 2 big ones and while with lots of time they're easier or less big problems its not as if they simply aren't problems.

      These days, Joe Sixpack doesn't only surf, office, MSN, and so some e-mail. Joe Sixpack found out he can download Photoshop from the Internet.

    3. Re:Marketing opportunity? by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      Games. Games, games, games, games games. It won't work, unless Joe User can play the latest, greatest games on the box without having to hack around with Wine(X).

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    4. Re:Marketing opportunity? by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1

      Joe User plays their games on a PS2. Or the web. Windows games are fast becoming a geeks-only thing--soon, PC gaming will be even more obscure than Linux.

    5. Re:Marketing opportunity? by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1
      You're right about hardware compatibility, but Joe Sixpack runs Photoshop?! Joe Sixpack is running whatever stupid ass image editing program came with their digital camera/scanner/printer whatever. Gimp would definitely be an improvement.

      BTW mplayer definitely works way the hell better than Windows Media Player--there's a huge chunk of files I download from the Internet that have problems playing in WMP that I've never been able to solve, but mplayer just views with no problem at all. I was surprised to discover this, I never felt linux video playing would work as well in Linux as it does in windows, but in fact now I find myself rebooting to Linux all the time to play movies! It seems to play more movies, it's more configurable, and X11 doesn't offer me as many headaches for playing a movie on my television while listening to music on my computer upstairs.

      Linux still has its share of usability problems, but my Gentoo really ownz the crap out of my XP for playing movies. Strange but true.

    6. Re:Marketing opportunity? by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1

      This is definitely true. I'm really shocked that something like this hasn't already happened in Europe or Asia yet--come on guys, our president is hard at work doing everything possible to make you guys hate us, but you STILL insist on importing the one American product I want you to stop importing, Microsoft!

    7. Re:Marketing opportunity? by travail_jgd · · Score: 1

      "It won't work, unless Joe User can play the latest, greatest games on the box without having to hack around with Wine(X)."

      Most of the older users (40's and 50's) I've worked with have never played any games on their Windows install -- except for Solitaire and Minesweeper. The default games included with Gnome or KDE would be more than enough for people with similar interests.

      For PCs in the office (from the SOHO to corporate level) or in schools, the lack of games could be seen as an advantage.

      I would have replied sooner, but I was playing Unreal Tournament on my Gentoo system. (True, it's an older game, but I have an "older" computer.)

    8. Re:Marketing opportunity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > first big vendor that offers a complete Linux system

      Vendors should be really looking at what to do when MS pulls the plug on OEMs.

      MS are already saying that "hardware will be free, you will pay for software". The basis of this is that MS want to make computers into a subscription service. They want to 'give' you a computer and collect a monthly fee for software rental, internet access, music and films.

      Dell will not be giving away their computers so MS will have to make their own along the lines of X-Box 2, ie an X-PC.

      MS have a history of co-operating with 'partners' only as long as it suits them. They have pushed the OEMs as far as they can. In order to increase revenue further MS need to move to new market areas, such as hardware - X-Box was just a prototype of what they will do next, they have 60 billion they can invest in taking the whole desktop PC revenue, not just the software.

      If Dell wants to survive it must do so without MS, it has nothing that MS wants other than a revenue stream that MS will swap for a larger one based around MS X-PC.

    9. Re:Marketing opportunity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay well, the lil-bit-less-Joe-Sixpack's do. Warez is certainly more easier to get these days. That's on which i based that. Unfortunately this means the price vs quality argument doesn't count anymore because the pirice of Photoshop is 0 while the price of GIMP is also 0. Because PS is better (not always but on most aspects) people want PS, "the Real thing".

      I agree MPlayer is very, very good. I don't really know if the GUI is good enough though, because i never use that. Real/Quicktime (Sorenson) don't work, or only on x86 with hacked DLL + illegally. That's beyond the MPlayer developers i fully understand but fore the user it is an unfortunate thing cause a feature is missing disallowing themto view certain movies.

  55. savings? by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

    While not the only thing to consider, is a similarly equip'd system cheaper than one with XP on it? I'm just wondering what 'value' joe user will see when considering Linux. Unfortuantely a cheaper price will need to lead the way.

    Additionally if you can order boxen with Linux, then you SHOULD be allow to order 'naked' boxen from Dell, with no OS present. Currently you CAN do this, but only through their 'small business' section.

    That's how I'd like to do it, but if I have to get Linspire on it, that'd be fine, I'd just need to do a fresh Slackware install once the box was in my hands.

    CBVDS

  56. I bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I bet this is a ploy by Dell to obtain more favourable terms for its OEM licenses from Microsoft.

    One can expect them to drop Linux again in a few weeks once they have been to Redmond to have a personal talk with Bill and Steve

    (you know MS dont want to loose one of their biggest resellers)

  57. I've used it by stealth.c · · Score: 1

    ...back at version 3 (or before), when the flaws that everyone parrots existed. It was a nice distro regardless.

    Installing it was as easy as putting the disc in, turning the computer on, making at most TWO very clear choices, and when it finally booted to the desktop, things looked pretty good.

    I believe the "user runs as root" flaw has since been abolished, and I hear it is now pretty easy to turn it back into Debian once installed.

    I don't know if it is one of the best distros, but once it escapes its stigma, it just might be.

    Any bad image associated with LinSpire is probably due to its antagonistic CEO.

  58. Re:For the second? third? time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not DrDOS--that's a virus! It must be cuz Windows told me so

  59. Lindows... Linspire? by dpilot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I fear Lindows, because it's basic installation is 'run as root' in order to simplify things. IMHO this is no better than Win9X or WinNT with the first/prime user set up as Admin, and perhaps worse because new Lindows users will be even more ignorant that they were on Windows. They will be more susceptible to human-engineering attacks because they'll have less experience, and because they think they're getting better security just by moving away from Windows.

    IMHO, Lindows should have set up root and a default user, and a bunch of sudo gui programs to admin the box. The default user should have been a random name, with the installation option to change to a user-chosen name. Then use the autologin feature of gdm/kdm/xdm so the system boots to a ready-to-just-use state.

    Next thought... Include something like pam_usb hooked into the sudo, and include a USB memory key. The installation process sets up the key, and then you plug it in to administer the box. Make the user aware that the key IS the security, and not to leave it just plugged in. Possibly even limit the admin that can be done while the network is up. Include a sticky hook so it can be stored on the system.

    Does Linspire run users as root?

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Lindows... Linspire? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. I've never used Lindows/Linspire, but I've heard about the default of running as root. I've used Mandrake and Gentoo where the installation automatically asks you to create a "normal" user account.

      Any time I've installed Windows XP (home or Pro) it does the same thing. XP does prompt you to create a user account, but that account is set by default in the administrator group. Looks like linspire is going down the same trail.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    2. Re:Lindows... Linspire? by armyofone · · Score: 1

      I thought the 'run as root' thing was changed quite a while ago - when it was still called 'Lindows' and selling pre-installed on Wal-Mart/MicroTel boxes.

      Have they really gone back to this idiocy with the name change?

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    3. Re:Lindows... Linspire? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Didn't know that, hope 'run at root' really is gone, forever.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    4. Re:Lindows... Linspire? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I agree that running as root is bad, but it's not as bad as it sounds. In a typical desktop system, every important file is in the user's home directory. Not running as root only prevents you from inadvertently screwing up system files, which isn't a big deal because you can simply reinstall. Reinstalling is bad, and you want to avoid it when you can, but it's nothing compared with the ability to steal or delete the user's files or use his box as an infection vector or spambot, all of which don't require root privs.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    5. Re:Lindows... Linspire? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      But if you don't run as root, many things can be done to prevent a machine from becoming a zombie. If you run as root, all of that is pretty easily circumvented.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    6. Re:Lindows... Linspire? by tengwar · · Score: 1

      I use a Mac. There is no way to log in to root directly (no legal password), and sudo is used to work as root. That seems to offer as much security as the normal Linux way of having a separate administration account, while allowing a fair degree of convenience. Of course Linux systems could be set up this way, and I may do this in future.

  60. Bad story! Misinformitive! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Dell just recently clarified the situation in an artivcle on zdnet.com located here .

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  61. Microsoft discount by gr8_phk · · Score: 3, Insightful
    They are probably trying to get a better price from Microsoft. Those preloaded copies of Windows cost a lot. While they are Intel only they often evaluate the offerings from AMD and Intel knows it and offers fair prices to them. Now they're going to play Linux against MS and hope for better pricing there too.

    Competition reduces cost - economics 101.

    1. Re:Microsoft discount by Branka96 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Because of the Consent Decree with DoJ, the top 10 OEMs have the exact same contract for preloading Windows. No room for Microsoft to pressure any of them individually. At the same time, no room for any of the companies to pressure Microsoft.

  62. Or is it just a bundle with a zero priced OS by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or is it just a bundle with a zero priced OS. Thanks to the BSA, shipping an OS with a PC is mandatory in some parts of the world.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  63. for Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell should choose a Europian distro like Mandrake and/or SuSE, PLD/ALT for eastern europe

  64. "Linux" Support is the Key Here by eigerface · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact that Dell is supporting any linux distribution is what's significant here.

    By supporting linux as the OS as a vendor, you automatically guarantee hardware support for at least one distribution.

  65. DELL ISN'T SELLING LINUX by swordboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    It should be noted that Questar is loading Linux on these Dell "white boxes". Dell has nothing to do with this decision. FWIW, Dell offers a "white box" service to mom&pop shops that don't want to build their own PCs. Once you become a distributor, you simply roll your own packages and sell the PC as your own brand. Questar is simply a white box distributor.

    ANYONE can go out and do this. It doesn't mean that Dell has anything to do with selling Linux. This is secondary.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:DELL ISN'T SELLING LINUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Dell is installing Linspire via an imaging process to the systems prior to sending to Questar. Dell is fully behind this and plans to ship Linspire systems to other countries in the coming months. I work for Dell and help to install Linspire on systems shipping to Questar.

  66. Office conversation: by stealth.c · · Score: 1, Funny
    ...or at least how I hope it goes...

    Dell: We've begun offering Linux as another desktop OS.

    MSFT: We know you've been dealing with this--Open Source--for some time now. We're willing to give you a clean slate, a 75% discount on Windows, if you help us bring a known danger to the software industry to its knees.

    Dell: Well, that sounds like a pretty good deal. But I think I've got a better one. How about: you give us the discount, and we keep selling Linux computers. {flips off the MS rep}

    MSFT: What good is a Linux computer--if you are unable to sell Windows?

    Dell: {Picks up phone} Hello, Department of Justice?

    DoJ: Yeah, we know all about it. We're sending Donald Rumsfeld, and he's bringing his Sodomy Bat of Justice.

  67. Ugh, Linspire by The+Slashdotted · · Score: 1

    Fry's sold $100 door-buster computers at their grand opening, each loaded with Linspire, 128Mb Ram.

    Excited, I flip the switch get to a screen with Linspire, Diagostics, If you choose Linsire, it flashes to a boot screen and ends in a blinking cursor. If you choose Diagnostics, it says "Screen" can't start up.

    Google shows a newb a year and a half ago, with the exact same error of the exact same model (Great Quality). A forum admin asked what the specs were. Newb said no idea, bumped it 3 times and said Linux is crap.

    So I hope it's a hardware issue, add 512 memory, no change. Take of the KVM, no change, reinstalled with XP, and resold it for $400.

    Don't get me wrong, I want to be familiar with Linux badly. But it hurts credibility badly with vendors dumping boxes that go to a blinking cursor. That's why we should load something like Freedos for cheapos and Linux for high-end machines.

  68. Corporate/Government Desktop by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 2, Informative
    IMHO, Desktop Linux IS already there, with the caveat of doing a bit of research before buying peripherals (most hardware is supported but not all of it is).

    From a Business point of view, the Giants (IBM, Sun, Dell) seem to be sharpening their teeth to get ready to provide Linux Desktop solutions for big corporations and Government departments worldwide. IBM and Sun have actually been doing it, and actually deploying solutions, and Novell just jumped in. Intel IS lagging behind IMHO. Not that I care :-)

  69. Mixed feelings. by qualico · · Score: 1

    On the one hand I would like to see Linux gain market share and Dell could make this possible.

    On the other hand though, I like Linux as a "guru" OS that seperates the men from the boys.
    If Dell has it their way, they would be getting into the market to take away my service sales here also.

    Dell and HP/Compaq have already taken my hardware sales.

  70. As well as they did last time they tried by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    (shortly before abandoning it). If you want Linux it, you go out and get it yourself, exactly the flavour that you need. I certainly don't want to be railroaded into paying for a Lin*whatever desktop any more than I want to pay for a Windows install.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  71. but no AMD? by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it interesting dell will try an obscure distro of linux but they still won't come out with any PC with arguably superior AMD cpu's. It's not so radical- after all HP also offers AMD

    --
    Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
    1. Re:but no AMD? by emorphien · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say superior, but fiercely competitive. Superior in some tasks, inferior in others.

      There aint much sexier than AMD 64 processors or the Intel Dothan processors though. Both kick ass.

      I keep hoping one of these Dell AMD machine rumors will come true, obviously a lot of other manufacturers have done it, and if Dell did, it could seriously change public opinion of AMD. Many people are still afraid of AMD, and think Dell is an example of what PCs should be. If dell used AMD it'd be a huge public approval of AMD in a sense. Your average joe still thinks there's nothing better or safer than Intel, and while there's nothing wrong with that, there's no reason to stick to it. I would have built an Opteron system last fall if it weren't for the fact that software support just isn't there. I built a moderately priced P4 system instead and it will hold me over quite nicely. If Dell jumps in 64 bit with both feet for the consumer it could force a more rapid interest in 64 bit software development. /not trying to be off topic but his comment sparks interesting discussion

      --


      Presently here, but not there.
    2. Re:but no AMD? by icke · · Score: 1

      The reason is that the Dell business model is geared up to leverage Intel's R&D. Dell invest about 1.5% of revenues in R&D and HP about 5% and IBM's 5.5% and claim they are the only company who's core business is still PCs (and they make money from them). So their model is that by developing a deep relationship with Intel they gain value from the R&D investment that Intel can amortise over the whole Intel market.

  72. Testing? Or a clever ploy.... by Fenis-Wolf · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Is this a 'test' run? I doubt it. More than likely I'd guess that this is a clever move by Dell to put some pressure on Microsoft.

    Dell is a major PC manufacturer, so by 'offering' Linux as an 'alternative' they could be leaning on Microsoft for some sort of better deal, perhaps a slight lessening of the cost for each copy of Windows they buy? We all know in this day and age 'Cost is King' and every dollar they save will likely help them save loads of new computers.

    http://michfilmfestival.com

    http://a2tech.us

    --

  73. Answer: No by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Could this be a real attempt to gain a foothold before any of the other distributors do?

    No, because other companies like HP and IBM, just to name a couple, have been selling and supporting Linux workstations for some time already.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  74. Re:For the second? third? time? by winse · · Score: 1

    I guess hp is pitching mandrake now as well. It was a surprise to me to see that. I thought that they were going to preload suse, but I guess i'm out of the loop.

    --
    this sig is deprecated
  75. Many Linux models by charnov · · Score: 1

    Uh...you can order several single and dual processor Dells with Red Hat Enterprise preloaded. Dell Workstations

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
  76. It's not testing the market... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    No, it's not testing the market. They're just trying to circumvent Microsoft's ire for daring to offer a competing product.

  77. Microsoft pays Dell (VAR) to .... by BrentRJones · · Score: 0, Troll

    market a Linux distro with a flaw/bug that will make users reject it.

    Conspiracy Theorist and former Nader supporter

    . ,

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  78. default root login by kabloom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does Linspire still have the default root login thing I heard so much about? How's their security compared to other distros?

  79. Dell in 1998 by Efialtis · · Score: 1

    In 1998 Dell sold LapTops with Linux on them. You couldn't find it in their catalog, they didn't openly advertise it. You could call them and request linux on a laptop. Shortly thereafter, Dell and Microsquat has a little chat. Dell suddenly pulled this ability and no more laptops were available with linux. They also sold laptops and computers WITHOUT operating systems installed, just a box of hardware. After Mr. Gates' chat with Dell, this practice was also abandoned.

    --
    --E--
  80. some dell server has no OS option by timts · · Score: 1

    so that you can install what ever you want.
    I am more interested if Dell will use AMD cpu, instead of what OS they choose.
    since I can always wipe out the HD and install the OS I like.
    but the limited hardware option would be a real concern, when dell is the vendor with good price

  81. Just like Apple... by 4lex · · Score: 1

    ...is testing the market for linux through their yellowdog resellers?

    Not that it is a bad thing. It is definitely a Good Thing (TM). Just take it with perspective.

    --
    My journal. Mainly about freedom.
  82. Re:For the second? third? time? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

    To answer the question, "Is Dell just testing the market?"

    Yes.

    Just as you mention, it's not the first time someone has tested the market and it's not going to be the last time. That's what companies do. Make something they think might sell and try it out to see what happens.

    Linux will be a mainstream desktop OS when one of the tests succeed. At that point, everyone else in the industry will copy whoever tested the latest Linux desktop successfully.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  83. It'll do poorly by defile · · Score: 1

    Linux needs a powerful brand to succeed on the desktop -- just like how Apple and Microsoft have powerful brands. Linux's technical capabilities are completely irrelevent.

    Successfully marketing Linux as a shrinkwrap product to compete with Microsoft/Apple requires an enormous degree of sales, marketing, and management resources. Unless I missed something, Linspire just doesn't have it.

    Dell is throwing its money away, and so are most people who buy these systems.

    Linux is of a species of software that the end user who sees their computer as a VCR or a toaster won't understand. It's completely possible to take Linux and refactor it into such a device and make that the de facto standard (kind of like taking the internet, lobotomizing it, and packaging it and calling it "AOL"), but that's going to take serious work.

    "Owning" Linux in the way that hardcore geeks own it is not a prospect that most end users can deal with.

  84. Was it on purpose?! by 53cur!ty · · Score: 1
    "While the choice of Linspire as a desktop may leave a few of you underwhelmed..."

    Perhaps Dell wants a Linux distro no one wants so they can report back to the public about how Linux failed because it wasn't ready for the desktop? How much would M$ pay for that to happen with a household name like Dell?

    Hmmmmm?!
    Where the future is...

  85. Redhat doesn't ship or offer... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ... consumer level desktop,at least now they don't, they offer a *corporate* desktop designed to be used by employees and installed and run and kept fixed and updated by professional sysadmins. Fedora is a hobbiest/developer community distro, it's not pushed at all as an entry level mom and pop and sis and junior distro either. I don't know about suse or any of the others. How many actual true beginners level distros are there in *fact* as opposed to *slashdot theory*, anyway? Linspire, xandros, what else? As far as I know, that's about it.

    The others can get *close*, but close ain't good enough, it has to really be there to be offered as an entry level beginners distro, the stuff has to work first time, every time, no CLI tweaking should be necessary to fit that bill. It doesn't matter if you can, what matters is if you *have to*, to set it up and run it effectively, and that means, sound has to work, media apps have to work, your display should work, you should be able to get online easy, etc, etc. The desktop competition is windows, and apple, and say what you want about them, good and bad, you don't have to touch a command line or know what to type on the command line to get all that stuff to work with those two companies products. Any linux home consumer desktop has to match or exceed that. So, how many distros fit the bill then?

  86. one main goal by wardk · · Score: 1

    the number one goal for Dell is to not piss off Microsoft.

  87. All-in-all good news by ericdfields · · Score: 1

    Why? Because Linspire and any other future desktop-targeted Linux distro needs to be just like Windows and OS X in that they are literally 'plug and play' distros. No new computer user wants to install, configure, or tweak their system right out of the box; they want to use it. They want programs that say what they are: "Internet" "E-mail" on an easily understandable start menu. When they do want to change something like the desktop wallpaper or themes, they want something that is straight to the point and gets the job done. When the time comes that they need to install new software, it needs to be as easy as downloading a package and double clicking it (or something similar, like an easy-as-pie, not cryptically named version of 'synaptec' (sp?)).

    So I'd say this is basically a good move. Linspire is easy to use. Xandros is easy to use. Both are commercial but if that's what it's going to take for computer distributors like Dell and HP to get Linux to the users, so be it. Even the candy-colored, 'easy to use' Mandrake isn't an ideal desktop for newbies.

    Now, if a bunch of Gentoo l33ts out there want to get together and create a Gentoo-based distro with a straightforward, gui installer (anaconda???), simple and easy to use default gnome interface configured with an appealing theme and icons, with internet, e-mail, IM, games, and office apps installed by default, and a pretty GUI interface to portage ("What would you like to install today?"), then you might have a more free Linux distro that both newbies and linux gurus can agree upon...

  88. Re:For the second? third? time? by bamm · · Score: 1

    Dell still offers a Linux workstation. It comes with RedHat Enterprise Linux. They also have OSless desktops.

    Don't get too excited though. It is still cheaper to buy a system preloaded with Windows XP than it is to purchase the exact system without an OS. I recently compared an Optiplex 170L (w/XP) to an Optiplex 170LN (w/FreeDOS on disk but not installed). The 170L came in at $593 while the 170LN with the exact same hardware and support contract was $716. Go figure. Mad propz to the U.S. Justice Department for keeping the Microsoft monopoly in check [end sarcasm].

    --
    www.sguil.net
    The Analyst Console for NSM
  89. Linspire is built on Debian anyway by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Linspire is built on a Debian foundation, it can be altered to use APT and then upgraded for free.

    So it's not a bad choice, plus the OS will be tailored to the hardware and setup nicely. So no complaints about hardware not working and Linux being hard to install etc..

    I've heard worse news before.

  90. Slashdot listens to the Pied Piper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell is NOT installing Linspire. This is Michael Robertsons method of getting you to INFER that his product has been selected by a company with a good reputation.

    The extension of a positive feeling about one company (DELL) to influence the judgement of an unknown product (LINDOWS/LINSPIRE) is a false and not logical conclusion.

    Robertson uses this effect in other matters as well.

    Lindows | Windows
    - Positive halo is the association with
    the term 'windows' which is known throughout
    the world as a desktop operating system.
    - Accentuates the negatives of the MS
    Monopoly and our our version *indows
    is less expensive. Believe me, Michael
    wants to own his own Monopoly. Look
    at Click-n-Run - it's a monopoly strategy.

    lTunes | iTunes
    - Trades on the good marketing of Apple
    computer to assign all the "goodness"
    of the iTunes platform to lTunes without
    having to spend any time really adding
    "goodness" to lTunes.

    Sigh - slashdot - read twice, publish once.

  91. Of course they are... by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

    If you knew they were testing the market, then why did you "Ask Slashdot" if they were? If you are going to ask people what they think, please try not to bias their answers.

    - un1xl0ser

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  92. Dell, Oracle, and Linux by bmetzler · · Score: 0

    I don't know about elsewhere, but here in Minneapolis, MN Dell has been running an ad campaign, radio and print promoting Oracle on Linux. -Brent

  93. Dell is installing Linspire at the factory! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for Dell and we are imaging Linspire on the hard drives for Questar at our factory. I personally worked with Lindows to get an image so we could ghost the drives for questar. Dell will be shipping Linspire installed systems to other countries via resellers in the coming months.

  94. how they'll view them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I wonder how Microsoft will view Dell, now?

    Same way as the Terminator will view them... in red, with a menu with options on how to eliminate the target... Dell.

  95. Of course! by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    Of course. I cannot believe that after Dell's demante and the follow-up news they can still create such stupid speculative post

    Lately some articles here remind me of The Onion - untrue and laughable.

  96. Im not sure about you guys but... by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    Id rather see Dell test the waters with AMD. Not that I hate linux or anything. I use it daily for work. Its not something I would use on my computer though. I think its wrong to assume that any move away from windows is a good move. After all, Windows is not THAT bad. It is really easy to use. I doubt you could say the same about all the linux distos. Although I hear many-a-claim that its soooo easy. Maybe to people who have been trained on it. Anyhow, maybe it will put some preasure on MS to actually improve windows and give us a better product..feel free to mod me down.

  97. The answer here is very simple by EatenByAGrue · · Score: 1

    I'm reading lots of detailed analysis on how Dell is planning this or that, putting pressure on MS, etc etc. In actuality, there's a very simple equation. If they sell lots of Linux boxes, they'll offer more. If the cost of developing a standard install and supporting them is too high, they'll stop offering the system.

    Contrary to Slashdot belief, there's no huge pent-up demand for Linux desktop systems. There will be no stampede. But maybe their margins will be high enough to keep offering them.

  98. Who cares about the operating system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been an IT professional for many years, but I have changed job and in the last years I have just been a pure user, and as a pure user I can tell you that I do not care about the operating system. Not even about the applications, as far as they do what they are expected to do.
    All I expect from the PC is that it adequately plays sound and video files, it allows me to edit text documents, spreadsheets or presentations in a way that is, more or less, the one I am used to, and that is it, because I have other and more important problems and no time to waste playing with the machine.
    So, in the end, the operating systems choice, whether Linux, Windows or any other, should not be a real issue for the buyer. This is why Microsoft thinks that it is necessary to spend so much money in advertising, and also in other less clear marketing activities. They make big efforts trying to convince the people of the importance of the operating system because it hasn't got any importance, but they do not want users to realize this for obvious reasons.

  99. Dell is only protecting its market in Europe by feloneous+cat · · Score: 1

    With the European judgement, Dell is looking at Microsoft as being problematic in the Europe. So what do they do?

    Punt.

    Face it. MS is looking bad in Europe. It doesn't really help the bottom line to ONLY be selling MS OS's. So by stuffing in Linspire, they sorta' be offering an alternative...

    Or at least, that is what the Dell PR Dept. thinks...

    Personally, I think it all sounds like bullshit.

    --
    IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
  100. Re:Testing? Or a clever ploy.... by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 1

    The terms of the settlement prevent MS from offering different prices to different OEM's. So Dell would be very foolish if that was their tactic. What they might be doing is trying to increase the rebate^H^H^H price they get for participating in the "OEM recommends Microsoft Windows Version" campaign that was set up to get around that restriction.

  101. Mozilla, OpenOffice? by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Vastly more interesting to me would be if a major vendor started shipping all their computers with Mozilla based browser and e-mail, and OpenOffice as an alternative to the very expensive Microsoft Office. Get people used to using the open tools, then the next time you sell a computer you can sell an open OS.

  102. OS-less boxes by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    I'm yawning over this story. They might as well be pre-installing FreeDOS for as much good Linspire will do me. I'm not knocking Linspire, it's just not my system of choice.

    I want to see Dell provide an options for shipment without an OS. This would help everyone, even the Windows users. Examples:

    1) Debian users won't be paying for Linspire. Even if it's only $5 of the price, that's still $5 too much.

    2) Windows XP Professional users won't be paying $100 for Windows XP Home.

    3) Corporate Windows XP Pro users won't be paying tens of thousands of dollars for Windows licenses that they won't be using, since they already have a license for that drive image they're going to ghost to all of their machines.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  103. The future of the computer retail business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is the future of the computer retail business.

    A "good enough for most applications" PC can be manufactured and sold by the likes of dell for less than 500$ with acceptable quality.

    Except for the fan noise, the design and the keyboard, the average computer user will not see any difference between the different vendors offerings, so he will make his purchasing decision on price and convenience of purchase.

    However, the $500 price tag is only a smaller and smaller part of the cost for the user, because he will have to set up the system software for his environment.

    Therefore, I think in the future, the customer will not want to buy a "3GHZ Windows XP Computer", but an "office workstation", a "home computer", an "education PC" or a "file and Backup Server".

    Here is an example:

    I would be in the market right now for two of the following "Internet Access" systems:
    A PC running a several browsers for different users, either natively or in several vmware instances, that are acessed over VNC connections or X-Sessions from within an intranet. The PC would be isolated from the intranet by a small router (if possible, built into the PC on an PCI card or better in a USB Stick) that would only allow e.g. VNC sessions from the intranet.

    The PC would boot from a DVD (Knoppix-Like) an would store cookies and URLs in a USB-Flash stick.

    A DSL Modem would be preconfigured (An ISP might market this box).

    If there was such a system on order for around $700, I would immediately order two for my sister and my parents small business.

    But buying all the componetnts and configuring the software currently is too much hassle for me, so a sale is lost for the PC industry.

  104. Dell is really not going to embrace Linux... by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

    Dell basically sells linux with optiplex workstations and latittude with Linux only via special which is hidden in back pages of their website. But if you go through their home/home office section, you don't see the linux mentioned. Ultimately, I dont think its becuase Redmond is pulling their strings, but rather it is too costly to support for little demand. Look past the basic install and factor in all the bundled software, drivers, help software and support. Some of this is written in-house and some is rebranded but all only support windows. Dell would have to extend extra expense supporting a linux alternative which would drive up cost of their systems. This would hurt their bottom-line in the end.

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  105. Most definitely a step in the right direction... by carn311 · · Score: 1

    Its great to see a major player like dell finally taking steps to bring opensource to the masses rather than just the corporate world.

    --
    Click here to find out what true knowledge real
  106. Linspire is a consumer distro by flacco · · Score: 1

    Linspire is a consumer distro - that's the big news here. they aren't targeting the workplace with workstation-class machines set up with corporate-friendly red hat - they're targeting average joes and josephines.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  107. Commentary on linux.com by blajblaj · · Score: 1
  108. Re:For the second? third? time? by PishiGorbeh · · Score: 1

    Yes. Dell offers RedHat Linux on all of their workstation class computers.

  109. I"ve installed Lindows 4.0 and 4.5 on a few boxes. by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    and found it pretty easy to get going and easy to use in all but one particular installation where I had display configuration issues. Their "Warehouse" by subscription has worked seamlessly for installing new aps. Obviously it's not for the numerous OS geeks that hang out here, but a lot of "average" users could make good use of it very easily.

    As a number of folks here have pointed out, it's not really Dell that is selling preinstalled Linpire, but rather one of their resellers, but I think it's a very good sign.

    I lost my sig. No reward if found, though.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  110. Dell and Xandros by sammy_cda · · Score: 1

    I just read this press release by Xandros http://www.xandros.com/news/press/release24.html

    It is as follows:

    Acadia University Provides Xandros Desktop OS on Dell Laptops to Undergraduate Students

    Easy-to-use Xandros Desktop OS is the Linux Distribution of Choice for Unique Notebook Driven Program

    NEW YORK, NY -- Xandros, the leading developer of easy-to-use Linux solutions, and Acadia University today announced that Acadia University selected the Xandros Desktop Operating System (OS) as the Linux distribution of choice for its undergraduate students. The innovative Canadian university offers a customized version of the Xandros Desktop OS on Dell D600 laptops as part of its unique teaching and learning environment which is providing 9,000 notebook computers over three years to its students and faculty.

    "Acadia students depend on their notebooks to complete their coursework and participate in class," said Dr. Gail Dinter-Gottlieb, President and Vice-Chancellor of Acadia University. "With the Xandros Desktop they can feel comfortable in conducting research and completing assignments. Xandros provides flawless wireless connections, while off campus students and faculty can dial in to our extensive campus network."

    "We needed a total Linux solution for both faculty and students," said Mike Grimm, Atlantic Region Account Executive for Dell Canada. "We found that the Xandros Desktop provided excellent network integration and ease of use, plus it works flawlessly on our Latitude laptops enabling the students of Acadia to meet their challenging day-to-day computing requirements."

    "Acadia's commitment to innovation is evident across academic disciplines through its technology-rich teaching and learning environment that integrates university-supplied notebook computers into the undergraduate curriculum," said Dr. Frederick H. Berenstein, Xandros Chairman and CTO. "We are honored to be the Linux desktop of choice for the Acadia's unique program and look forward to an ongoing relationship that keeps both Acadia and Xandros in the forefront of technological innovation."

    Acadia's students receive Dell Latitude D600 notebooks for use during the academic year, and their computers become an integral part of their learning experience. The Xandros Lab has certified the Xandros Desktop OS on the Dell D600 model, including the detection and operation of wireless network cards and other peripherals.

    Dr. Berenstein added that "we believe that Linux will play an enormous role in the educational market, as it offers schools and universities a cost-effective, stable and secure computing environment for their students. Software applications being developed for the educational market are amazingly useful, incredibly compact and fast. And with twenty-five countries voting to wire their school systems to the Internet with Linux, there will soon be hundreds of millions of students surfing the net with Linux on their desktops."

    The Xandros Desktop OS provides students and teachers with a familiar set of tools that integrate seamlessly with existing Windows environments and wireless networks. For educational options and site licenses, please contact schools@xandros.com

    About Xandros
    Founded in 2001 with headquarters in New York and research and development facilities in Ottawa, Xandros, Inc. is the leading developer of easy-to-use Linux solutions targeting home and enterprise markets. Xandros pioneered a low-cost alternative operating system that provides seamless compatibility with Microsoft Windows programs and networks. For more information please visit www.xandros.com

    About Acadia University
    Located in Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Acadia was the first university in Canada to integrate notebook computers into the undergraduate curriculum. Through its technology-rich teaching and learning environment, students use today's technology to develop the advanced analytical skills they need to adapt to ever-changing study and work environments. For more information please visit www.acadiau.ca

    Maybe more is going on than we thought.

  111. You Pay More For Nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude,

    Since you reinstall from scratch, you get the privilege of paying more than for a Windows machine for something you wipe out anyway. You install a FREE OS, and pay MORE than for the same machine with Windows.

    I genuinely believe you have just documented the IDIOT TAX.

    Dude, you're not gettin' a CLUE!

  112. Robertson made them a deal they couldn't refuse. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    MR:I will email you all these crappy garage rock mp3s I own thanks to mp3.com all day, everyday until you buy my OS.

    Dell: Holy crap, he's serious.

    MR: Here they come!

    Dell: My ears! Oh, the agony. Here take the check!

  113. A step in the better direction by HolyMoses!! · · Score: 1

    I think any large company offering desktops with any form of Linux for the everyday user is fantastic. If you are familiar with Windows, Linspire would seem to be the next step towards putting a better operating system on your computer, for 2 reasons:

    #1 - Your family and friends don't have to have their heads stuck in a computer all day (like most of us) to use the operating system. Linspire is arguably the most user friendly Linux system out there. If you are unfamiliar with Linspire - check out their site - http://www.linspire.com/sales_intro.php

    #2 - If you are in any way familiar with Windows environments, Linspire offers something almost identical, plus applications that are similar to MS Office and an online warehouse of more than 2000 software titles available to download - most for free and some to buy.

    I've been thinking about ditching WinXP Pro and getting Linspire myself.
    I think it's a good next step - but Dell should advertise about it.