Slashdot Mirror


Unsung Heroes of Open Source Software?

Yaztromo asks: "Sometimes, as an Open Source Software developer, I wonder if anyone out there is actually noticing the contributions I make to the software they're running. This got me thinking today -- how many Open Source Software packages am I running without knowing or applauding those who toiled in the background to developed them? We all know about personalities like Richard M. Stallman and Linus Torvalds, but there are a lot of unsung heroes of Open Source out there whose names may not be on the tips of everyones tongues. But perhaps they should be. They may be wizard coders, or amazing project administrators, or they provide fantastic support. Maybe they do all three, and more. Or maybe they're the person in your organization who pushed an Open Source solution in the face of an entrenched closed-source solution, and won. Or the one who printed up a whole spindle of Knoppix CD's and handed them out at a user group meeting. So here's you chance: who is your favorite unsung hero of Open Source Software, and why?"

601 comments

  1. Don't just mention them... nominate them by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is partly what the Open Source Awards are about. Anyone can nominate people or projects for awards and $500 Merit Awards are handed out quarterly. You can see the current list of winners.

    Voting will soon get underway for Q3 winners so get nominating!

    John.

    1. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But if you look at their awards, you see all the big names are given award, while the more "unknown" people are simple ignored. I mean, why give Larry Wall YAFA (YetAnotherFrickinAward)? I don't want to put his work down, but quite a few other people could use a boost in confidentiality and a little bit of money to encourage them to continue their astonishing work.

      Larry Wall got enough of both already...

    2. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, I'm saying "bullshit" to that comment. Yes, Larry Wall got an award. There's a once yearly award for a "Grand Master of Open Source": who are we going to give it to? Some guy who wrote a three link patch for banana-wumpus-6.5?

      The $500 awards go to plenty of other people that aren't in the news all the time and deserve the awards and recognition. And secondly if people would nominate more projects and people then we'd know about other deserving winners.

      John.

    3. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by zonker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i think folks that write documentation for open source projects are often unsung. think of all of the documentation that exists for projects like linux, apache, perl, etc. these projects wouldn't be nearly as useful if there wasn't good documentation for them.

      documentation is one of those non-sexy aspects of open source that is often the hardest part to find someone to get it done, and even harder to get done in a way normal folks can understand. tech oriented folks, like programmers, often have a hard time communicating complex ideas to non-tech folks in a usable form.

      fortunately, i know my work was well appreciated and helped lots of folks out with questions via the faq (i wrote lots of the documentation for the earlier versions of popfile). sadly, i lack the free time these days to continue working on the popfile project, but i'm proud to see lots of my work on the faq living on in the wiki and extended by others. btw, there's a new release of popfile today, thanks john & team! :)

    4. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by cybersaga · · Score: 1

      "boost in confidentiality"?
      Big words aren't one of your strengths are they?

    5. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by acebone · · Score: 1

      banana-wumpus at 6.5 already ???

      Boy I am on 0.1.0 and I just love it - gotta check out this new stuff !

      --
      Check out my PHP Url Validator
    6. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by arkanes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The testers and code auditors and everyone else who does the un-fun work that doesn't add features but instead makes sure that the code works for other people and that it stays in that condition. And I think the packagers, the ones who write the installation scripts and generally make software easy to use and easy to install also deserve a lot of credit.

    7. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some guy who wrote a three link patch for banana-wumpus-6.5?


      For those who don't know: Banana Wumpus was a adventure style Hentai game made by some creepy otaku kids in Japan. It was originally made for FreeBSD but will supposedly run on any *nix with libSDL installed. I have not played it but from the screenshots it looks like Sailor Moon meets Cthuhlu. Pretty cool looking stuff but most likely impossible to play if you cannot read Japanese.

    8. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big words aren't one of your strengths are they?

      ...And commas aren't one of yours. Your point?

    9. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by zonker · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i wholeheartedly agree. thanks for pointing them out too. there's a guy in the popfile team that wrote an awesome windows installer that not only installs but configures the application just like any normal windows app. it's a great addition to the featureset and makes the program more appealing to the general userbase.

      stuff like regression testing each time a new release comes out, good ui designers, code porters... yeah, the list is long.

    10. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by airjrdn · · Score: 1

      lmao I was waiting to see if anyone else had replied before I posted anything.

    11. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think folks that write documentation for open source projects are often unsung.

      If the programs you're referring to are any of the ones I happen to use, there's a good reason why they're unsung.

    12. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by cybersaga · · Score: 1

      hehe... you got modded down for that too... that's great...

    13. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

      Hey! Who let dubya post on here?

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
    14. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by Munra · · Score: 1

      How long til Debian stable gets banana-wumpus-6.5? ;O)

      Manta

    15. Re:Don't just mention them... nominate them by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think a user who READS the documentation is at least as rare and precious.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  2. Al Gore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Inventor of the internet... 'nuf said

  3. Bill Gates... by inkdesign · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks for making it necessary buddy!

    1. Re:Bill Gates... by suso · · Score: 1

      It kinda was. Linus himself said that he wanted his own computer, but didn't want to buy microsoft crap. So he made one himself.

      I think you can generalize it more as "Thanks to closed source software vendors for making it necessary."

    2. Re:Bill Gates... by vasubhat · · Score: 3, Informative

      umm ... no
      Atleast according to this book, it was a printer by Xerox, that ultimately led RMS to *start* the F/OSS movement ...

    3. Re:Bill Gates... by inkdesign · · Score: 1

      umn.. its a joke man! Thanks for the pointer to that book though, will have to read more than the first chapter when I'm not at work.

    4. Re:Bill Gates... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why thank you.

      I had that planned all along. You dont think I actually use my own products do you?

      Now thanks to FreeBSD and Linux I can finally kill my aging Xenix and Openserver installations. Sco took the bait.

  4. CowboyNeal, of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    CowboyNeal, of course!

    dumb question.

  5. Unsung sexy helpers! by garcia · · Score: 4, Funny

    All those random people that have single lines in software changelogs... Take this for example. There's a project that helped get support for a popular USB camera out into the wild.

    Look all the way at the bottom. There's one guy there that did a TON for the community ;-) I hear he's really sexy too!

    1. Re:Unsung sexy helpers! by Cat_Byte · · Score: 3, Funny
      Thanks to Razvan Surdulescu for kicking me back into action.

      I wanna be thanked for kicking people too!

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    2. Re:Unsung sexy helpers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would explain why garcia finds him so sexy.

  6. Obligatory Comment by BalorTFL · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ME!!! Just wanted to beat the rush... we all knew it was coming.

    1. Re:Obligatory Comment by savagedome · · Score: 1

      Of course. WindowsME definitely is one of the unsung heroes of Open Source.

  7. A True Open Source Hero is... by vfc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bill Gates, for encouraging thousands of people, including myself, to look towards open source...

    1. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by seizure · · Score: 2, Insightful

      perhaps you have forgotten what gates wrote in his open letter to Hobbiyists

      ".As the majority of hobbyists must be aware, most of you steal your software.........Most directly, the thing you do is theft."

    2. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by armyofone · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q: You do know what irony is don't you?
      A: Well sure, it's like silvery or goldy but it's made out of iron.

      *** rimshot ***

      Thank you. Thank you. I'll be here all week.
      Tip your waitresses and bartenders - they're working hard for you!!

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    3. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you follow along with the law suites that are on going, everything you learned belongs to someone else, nothing you do is orginal, no code that you write hasn't been written before. Ergo, WizDos is an infrignment, so where does Billy Goat get off?

    4. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      I think the point was BECAUSE Bill Gates was of the mindset "Ok, I woulnd't know anything if it wasn't for people giving it away freely, but if anyone wants my stuff they must PAY PAY PAY!!!! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAA!!!"

      That people started switching to Open Source Software.

      (Exageration used for comedic effect)

    5. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are law suites those things you find in the offices of lawyers?

    6. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I say Steve Jobs, without whom there would be no interfaces worth cloning...

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    7. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Credit where credit is due...

      to Xeroc PARC, whose interface Steve Jobs cloned!

    8. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, tip Ben Elton and Richard Curtis, who wrote the joke for BlackAdder.

    9. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      in case anyone doubts, it's true, that quote is from the very last episode of the last series of Black Adder.

    10. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by armyofone · · Score: 1

      You're right. I should have given credit where due, but I was in a hurry when I wrote it. I figured you purists would recognize the quote as coming from Black Adder.

      Lo, and behold, I was right!! :-)

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    11. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Would you like the Ironic part??

      Bill Gates encouraged MANY MANY people to flock to open source from almost day one. His "Basic" for the altair, even before he released his very first commercial program, his attitude towards users and others was so awful that many people hated him from day one. He sent a foaming at the mouth rant as an open Letter to all

      I remember sending him a letter at the ripe old age of 10 asking about when BASIC was going to be released so I could play with it on my dad's computer at work.

      I was Flamed hard in a rude reply about how software Thieves were delaying it and as a child it was beyond my capabilities anyways... I wish I still had the letter and I remember how it solidified in me a dis-taste for commercial software. I was writing assembly for my Commodore KIM-1 single board computer at that time and was excited with the idea of being able to easily program a real powerhouse computer.

      Bill gates has been driving people to Open source ever cince he started in the business.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by wildwood · · Score: 1

      Huh.

      Of course, the original is "goldy and bronzy" instead of "goldy and silvery" - I guess 'bronzy' sounds funnier.

      But when I googled for "irony goldy", I got a number of slight mis-quotes, especially "goldy and silvery", but even "goldy and steely". Go figure. (And now I'm _completely_ off-topic...)

      --
      normal(adj)- people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots [DECS]
    13. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Jobs was more of a manager. Credit goes where credit is due: Jef Raskin, Steve Capps, Bruce Horn, Bill Atkinson, etc.

    14. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by edbarrett · · Score: 3, Informative
      ".As the majority of hobbyists must be aware, most of you steal your software.........Most directly, the thing you do is theft."


      I appreciate the sentiment, but this has nothing to do with open source software. This is quoted from "An Open Letter To Hobbyists", something BG wrote to complain about the fact that people were pirating MS BASIC for the Altair back in 1976.
    15. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by zorglubxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's wrong with that ???

      I dont understand what is wrong with wanting to make a living from programming. Plumbers dont work for free, nor do teachers, doctors, librarians, truck drivers, even newspaper delivery guys. So why is it evil when developers expect to be paid for their work??

      I'm proud to be a programmer and that it pays my mortage. And no I dont ever want to live from selling support contracts.

    16. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by baeuar · · Score: 1

      GLPK Team, Octave Team R Project Team, and countless others who made my life easy and worth.

    17. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      "Was"? Not sure if you're serious, but there are certainly some efforts to clone Apple's current work too...

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    18. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything that is old will be new again. His comments from 1976 are completely apt to today's situation --only software piracy has expanded from direct theft of binary images to elaborate unethical conspiracies to reverse engineer and duplicate entire functionality suites that investors have risked their dollars developing. This "hidden-adjenda of open source" (to duplicate commercial offerings), like the direct binary theft in the late 70s and early 80s, has become so wide spread that an entire generation is emerging not knowing right from wrong in this regard leading them to publicly ask really stupid questions like "why do we need software patents"? Keep listening to that communist asshole who spent his career on MIT entitlements, or the kid who grew up with Andy Tannenbaum's book in a social system heavily influenced by the Soviet Union and you'll yourself in a whole lot of trouble by the time you grow up and realize you've commoditized yourself and you're not going to ever put even a small dent in the Capitalist Way. Everything that was old will be new again --except you.

    19. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plumbers don't do it in a way that drives people away from their business.

    20. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ans don't forget the Woz.

    21. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey dipshit he was writing Assembly language programs at the age of 10... what were you doing at that age?

      I'm betting acting stupid was top on your list.

      BillGates is an asshole, always has been and anyone that has ever met him and actually interacted with him knows this as fact. The ONLY people that like him are others that make money off him.

      BTW, he wrote very VERY little of basic, the other guys wrote most of it cince billy had very weak computer skills.

      billy was the business front, and he is smart in convincing companies to give him money.

      a computer genius? not a chance in hell... Bill Gates is as far from a computer Genius as you can get.

    22. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by schon · · Score: 1

      Plumbers also don't expect you to pay them every time you flush the toilet.

      Seriously, by listing people who provide a *service*, you're re-inforcing Lumpy's point.

    23. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by johnnyb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're right, it's a lot like teachers and doctors.

      Teachers don't get paid every time you use something you learn. They also don't get paid if you teach someone else what they taught you.

      Developing new techniques is one thing that great surgeons do, and then they share them with other surgeons. You don't have to pay the pioneering surgeon every time you do the procedure yourself.

      Similarly, with lawyers, you cannot copyright or patent a legal argument. If you make an argument in open court, it's there for anyone to use for the rest of eternity.

      "And no I dont ever want to live from selling support contracts."

      What about selling programming? X doesn't exist. Pay me Y and I'll bring it into existence. That's the way most software companies do things anyway. Remember, free software doesn't necessarily mean that you make software public, it means that those that receive the software have full rights to use, modify, and redistribute -- which is really a typical consulting agreement.

    24. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tsk. You misinterpereted the analogy.

      Let's say you want a toilet. You BUY the toilet and the plumber installs it for you (this is analogous to you buying a piece of software and letting the installer put it on your system). You wouldn't expect to get the toilet for free. SOMEONE had to create that toilet. Someone had to set up the install. So you pay. Then, you've got a toilet and you don't have to pay again unless you need additional work done.

      Get the picture? TANSTAAFL.

    25. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither do most programmers. The Microsofts of the world are a bent group of greedheads not suitable as a general example.

    26. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you sell software, you ARE selling programming. You are saying, X didn't exist, I created it, now if you pay me Y you can have it. There's nothing wrong with that. Using the plumbing analogy, if you want a toilet, you pay for the toilet and you pay for the install (the plumber installs the toilet and checks his work). You pay once, then you use the toilet for free until you need additional work done. Just like you pay once for software, and generally don't have to pay again unless you need something else (the Microsofts of the world notwithstanding -- but most of us programmers aren't psycho greedheads).

      TANSTAAFL, boys. TANSTAAFL.

      (For those of you who don't read Heinlein, "There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch").

    27. Re:A True Open Source Hero is... by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Your missing the point.

      "When you sell software, you ARE selling programming. You are saying, X didn't exist, I created it, now if you pay me Y you can have it."

      You have just described the free software model (and the proprietary model as well). Where the free software model and the proprietary model diverge is what happens AFTER the recipient gets the software. In the proprietary model, the originator still has control. In the open model, the originator does not. Free software is like teaching. I can charge for a class, but I cannot prevent you, after taking my class, to open up a class teaching the same things.

      But the free software movement has NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER with charging to receive copies of a program from an author.

  8. They're all to busy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    playing games on their Windows boxes.

  9. "Everyone" by SilentChris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "unsung heroes of Open Source out there whose names may not be on the tips of everyones tongues"

    Define "everyone". Ask mom who Bill Gates is and she'll probably know. Ask mom who Linus Torvalds is and expect a blank stare.

    1. Re:"Everyone" by arose · · Score: 1

      Ask IBM who Linux Torvaldes is.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:"Everyone" by LauraLolly · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ask Mom who Linus is...
      She sees the poster on the door to our workroom. She talks over whether 0S X is secure enough, and asks my Dad if he thinks they can harden both of their Macs.

      She uses Open Office, and Mozilla. I think my mom knows what Open Source is.

      One more thing. My mom is 73. My dad is 77. Never never never allow anyone to use the line about old dogs and new tricks in relation to computers.

    3. Re:"Everyone" by Deorus · · Score: 1

      Keep it on and ask your mom about Hitler, Bin Laden or George W. Bush. See the point?

      If you ask your mom about Steve Ballmer, she'll probably don't know what to answer, 'cause Ballmer hasn't harmed enough people yet.

      Good people lay low.

    4. Re:"Everyone" by Alan+Cox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My mum knows who Linus Torvalds is. OTOH she and a lot of open source people don't know much about Ulrich Drepper without whose tireless work we'd not have all the C library support and standards compliance we do

      But there are zillions of open source people who really matter, often in non-obvious ways. People like Bill Hanneman whose code few people use and everyone else hopes never to need to use, but whose code gets us into goverment and helps its users in important ways. The answer to that riddle btw is that he writes accessibility software so the disabled can use the Linux desktops.

      A free software role call would be a truely gigantic document and its precisely this that makes it work. Not just the big names but the tens of thousands of people who contributed an hour once to report and fix a bug.

    5. Re:"Everyone" by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight: you're putting Hitler, Bin Laden, G.W. Bush and Bill Gates in the SAME CAMP? My god...

    6. Re:"Everyone" by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      I know. Sheesh. People these days.

      Everyone knows Gates is much worse.

      [/sarcasm]

    7. Re:"Everyone" by darnok · · Score: 1

      No offence bud, but don't be surprised if your 73yo Mum has been asking your 77yo Dad about "hardening" for some years now.

      Just don't assume it's only an IT issue, despite the appearance of most of us...

  10. Eric Andreychek by donnyspi · · Score: 4, Informative

    We're using Eric's Openthought software at work. It's great and saves $$$.

    1. Re:Eric Andreychek by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting this! I have been looking for someway to update a portion of a browser page without refreshing the entire page for an industrial monitoring application.

  11. karma bait by Khyron · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Commander Taco!
    Roblimo!
    Cowboy Neal!

  12. Gene Spafford by Kurt+Wall · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...who did a lot of gratis work on Usenet long before most people could even spell I-n-t-e-r-n-e-t.

    1. Re:Gene Spafford by n9uxu8 · · Score: 1

      Ah...the Spaff! Christ I remember his computer security lecture back in my first Purdue computer course...interesting fellow....

      Dave

    2. Re:Gene Spafford by the+endless · · Score: 4, Funny
      before most people could even spell I-n-t-e-r-n-e-t.

      Ha! The idiot can't even spell 'intarweb'.

    3. Re:Gene Spafford by LearnToSpell · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He's got some of my favourite quotations of all time, too.

      Gene Spafford, another computer security expert, likened hacker break-ins to "being pecked to death by ducks."

      More at http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/homes/tripunit/spaf-a nalogies.html

    4. Re:Gene Spafford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THANKS FOR :

      More at http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/homes/tripunit/spaf-a nalogies.html


      I LIKED:

      "...consider cigarettes -- giving the people what they want may be killing them."

      "Architects cannot learn to design grand cathedrals if they are taught all their drawing courses using only an Etch-a-Sketch because the company struck a deal with the university..."

      In emailabout Windows supplanting other operating systems in Universities.

  13. cjk input by sakura+the+mc · · Score: 1, Interesting

    the dudes that came up with canna and kinput, do they count?

    1. Re:cjk input by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably, as well as the creators of Wnn (at least the free versions, up to Wnn4).

      Without them, Linux/*BSD would never have been as popular in Japan as they are now.

      Of course, since they're pretty vital pieces of functionality, you could take the view that somebody would have written a similar program if they didn't exist... but these guys actually did it.

      For the record, they are (list incomplete and in no particular order):

      Aida Shinra
      Kanou Hiroki
      Zukeran Shin
      Takamizu Toru
      Akira Kon
      Sugai Masaru
      Ryuichi Tamano
      Misao Yuko
      Nakano Shuji
      Ishisone Makoto
      Suzuki Naoshi

  14. The Samba Team by lkaos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why the Samba Team of course. Where would we be without it?

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
    1. Re:The Samba Team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK, Offtopic sig reply and all that, BUT:

      You're making me miffed with that func((b += 3, b)); stuff. I tested this on my C compiler and it compiles and runs. In fact, this works with any number of elements in a list of this sort. The last element in the commazized list becomes the parameter that is passed to the function, while the others are just evaluated (apparently after the function call, which is what your snippet is demonstrating).

      I didn't know this! Amazing that you can work with C so long without learning stuff like this. Admittedly, it's very stupid stuff, but still new. I can't think of a reason to use this. Why not just put the superfluous stuff outside the function call, which is where they belong?

      Anyway, I'm off to rearrange my brain now.

    2. Re:The Samba Team by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 2, Informative
      Andrew Tridgell is my hero.

      Samba, rsync, ccache(? - possibly wrong on that). I love him and I want his babies.

    3. Re:The Samba Team by j-pimp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell Yeah!!! I've been using samba since the 2.0 days and its great. From serving mp3s to my fellow college students to accessing windows file shares from my linux and mac boxes, to eventually replacing the windows PDC here at work samba is great. Truely the gateway drug of open source.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    4. Re:The Samba Team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, maybe if you ask politely...

    5. Re:The Samba Team by umeboshi · · Score: 1

      samba wanna?

    6. Re:The Samba Team by VE3MTM · · Score: 1

      The comma operator is covered in most respectable intermediate C or C++ books. It's commonly used in a for-loop declaration when there's more than one thing to declare or increment.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 Whoops, silly middle mouse button...
    7. Re:The Samba Team by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Informative
      The problem is that this article asked about the -unsung- heroes. Everybody knows about Samba. Groups like that get all the awards. They're big name projects, and lots of people use them.

      In my mind, though, the unsung heroes are the ones who toil for hours on end working on projects that a dozen or a few hundred people use. I'd like to give kudos to a few of them.

      Here's a couple of teams:

      • the Netatalk team
      • the CAP team
      And a list of people, listed alphabetically by team. For a fun challenge, figure out the projects they worked on.
      • Allen Briggs
      • Nigel Pearson
      • Bill Studenmund
      • John Wittkoski
      • Colin Wood
      • ------------------
      • Fred Bacon
      • Michael Burg
      • Gilbert Coville
      • Brett Halle
      • Mark Hatle
      • Nick Stephens
      I'm sure I left out a bunch of people I should have listed, but it's a start.
      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    8. Re:The Samba Team by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 5, Funny
      • Colin Wood
      • ------------------
      • Fred Bacon

      aw c'mon, ------------------ gets his share of credit, i see his name is source code all over the place

    9. Re:The Samba Team by humphrm · · Score: 1

      > ------------------

      The inventor of Morse Code, of course! Naturally tho, ------------------'s contribution cannot be examined without inclusion of his partner, ...................

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    10. Re:The Samba Team by lkaos · · Score: 1

      I don't remember why but I did have a valid reason for using this at some point.. I believe it was because I was initializing a variable with the results of a function but I cannot recall at this point. Anyway, I got thoroughly lectured on why this was evil by my team :-) Forgot I even had that as my sig...

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    11. Re:The Samba Team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where the hell is it that you think you are now? sheeeeeet.

    12. Re:The Samba Team by mlambie · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd like to nominate Tridge, but not for his work on Samba specifically.

      I was as Linux.conf.au and saw him sit down with a complete newbie who would have been maybe 17 years old. This guy was interested in writing some code for the AI competition that was running at the conference, but didn't seem to have much of a clue about how to start it off, let alone coding anything competetive.

      Tridge, out of the blue began an informal AI 101 lesson in the courtyard. I sat in on it and can honestly say I learnt more about AI in 10 minutes with Tridge then I did in four years of a CS degree. His presentation of the material came so fluently, confidently and with a warm manner.

      So, I nominate him for his *general* donation to the OS movement, and not for his Samba developments (though they are fantastic). It's because of people like him that others want to get involved and make a difference too, and that's the biggest influence we could ever want.

    13. Re:The Samba Team by boots@work · · Score: 1

      samba, rsync, ccache and much much more, but no babies as far as I know. He does have a puppy.

    14. Re:The Samba Team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also used sometimes in preprocessor macros.

  15. Definately Roland "Blood-bath" McGrath by bdrasin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Primary author of the GNU libc, co-author of GNU make...also of Hurd (for what its worth).

    Also a very cool, unassuming guy.

    1. Re:Definately Roland "Blood-bath" McGrath by AxelTorvalds · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amen. and Mark Mitchell who does tons on GCC.

    2. Re:Definately Roland "Blood-bath" McGrath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. Somebody I also admire a lot is Thomas Bushnell, BSG; he's the one who is largely responsible for the very interesting design of the Hurd, and for getting it off the ground (together with Roland, among others). And from what I've read of him (don't know him personally) he also seems an extremely cool person to me.

    3. Re:Definately Roland "Blood-bath" McGrath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of HURD, is it dead or what? No activity on the mailing list or CVS for about a year.

    4. Re:Definately Roland "Blood-bath" McGrath by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      So where did he get the nickname "Blood-bath"?

    5. Re:Definately Roland "Blood-bath" McGrath by Bas_Wijnen · · Score: 1

      It's not dead at all, and there is quite some activity on at least bug-hurd@gnu.org, help-hurd@gnu.org and l4-hurd@gnu.org.

      The problem is that the current version is based on Mach, which isn't really suitable for it. Currently it is being ported to the L4 microkernel (that's what l4-hurd@gnu.org is about, as you probably guessed) which should be much better for it.

    6. Re:Definately Roland "Blood-bath" McGrath by 0racle · · Score: 1

      He wasn't the guy who started any of those projects. Think about it.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    7. Re:Definately Roland "Blood-bath" McGrath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say there's a bigger problem than that. I was hoping to spend some time becoming familiar with the HURD as I recall it had a decent design for hacking on last time I checked.

      I went to Google and put in "gnu hurd", and found this website. I clicked on the "changelog" link, and found that the last change was in March, and that was just a readme update. The last significant change (i.e. excluding things like "add a space between a function and its arguments") was back in 2002.

      Okay, so I figure the changelog is stale. So I check out the mailing list archives for commit-hurd. There's a header file update for this month (so the mailing list is working). Last month, there was a single spam email. In fact, all the other emails to that list this year were spam.

      So now, I'm thinking "surely this project has been abandoned", so I go back to the main page, and click on "status". It says the last release was 0.2. Looking at the changelog, I find out that the last release of HURD was in June 1997!

      Now I'm thinking that perhaps I've just got an outdated website, but this is on the main gnu.org domain, it's the top result in Google, the mailing list seems to be operational, it's just that nobody has done anything significant for years!

      I was quite disappointed to find out that the HURD was dead, but from what you are saying, I gather that it is actually being worked on? If so, can you point me in the right direction, because everything else I can find tells me the project is deader than a parrot in a Monty Python sketch.

    8. Re:Definately Roland "Blood-bath" McGrath by Bas_Wijnen · · Score: 1

      Hmm, yes, the website is one of the big problems of the project. For more info, please read the mailinglists (linked in the other reply) or drop by on freenode (irc), channel #hurd.

  16. Red Demon by Coneasfast · · Score: 2, Informative

    i like the mascot of freebsd, always a good motivator, and heavily underrated.

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    1. Re:Red Demon by irokitt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you mean Ceren?

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Red Demon by Drakonian · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Did you know that the mascot was designed and drawn by John Lasseter of Pixar fame?

      At least that's what my BSD book says. Correct me if I'm wrong.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  17. Donald Becker by duffbeer703 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This guy is the ethernet driver guru.

    It may not seem relevant now, but there was a time when you had to hunt around for a linux-compatable ethernet driver.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Donald Becker by BeesTea · · Score: 5, Funny

      And only 4 that contain no vulgarity =)

      --
      2b2b2b415448300d
    2. Re:Donald Becker by kaszeta · · Score: 4, Funny

      This guy is the ethernet driver guru. And the co-founder of the Beowulf project, without which we would've never had the "imagine a Beowulf cluster of these" comments that we soooo love.

    3. Re:Donald Becker by Vilim · · Score: 1

      Agreed, he wrote the original 8139too driver which I run on 2 out of my 3 machines

      --
      History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Sir Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Donald Becker by Jon+Proesel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I went to high school with Don, and I can say that not only is he an outstanding programmer, but he's an outstanding friend as well. He's the most caring, trustworthy guy you'd ever want to meet.

      --

      --
      Using GNU/Linux - Windows-free zone!
    5. Re:Donald Becker by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      I second the nomination!

      Much thanks to Donald Becker for implementing cheap network card chipset (Realtek) support under linux!

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    6. Re:Donald Becker by redhog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except his code is unreadable with numerical constans everywhere and no comments. Not that he's bad at what he's doing - the code _works_ damn good, but it can't be used as documentation for the cards, and there is usually no other doc for them :(

      --
      --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    7. Re:Donald Becker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno... I heard that a lot of his drivers borrowed heavily from Walter Fagen's code.

    8. Re:Donald Becker by chuckfucter · · Score: 2, Informative

      I gotta totally agree, he actually updates drivers on cards that have been discontinued, he's better than the companys that make the cards. Mr. Becker, thank you.

    9. Re:Donald Becker by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 4, Informative
      ... and Donald Becker got the DrDobbs "Programming Excellence" award and is one of the most loudly acclaimed people of Open Source.

      If you want "unsung heros", I'd look elsewhere. (In the same space, Bill Paul of FreeBSD has my vote - more drivers, better code quality. That's my opinion from having hacked the code of drivers from both. But Bill has also gotten a fair amount of public recognition, especially after his Project Evil - supporting NDIS drivers on FreeBSD.)

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    10. Re:Donald Becker by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      All this, plus he finds time to tour with Walter Fagen and the rest of the guys in Steely Dan!

    11. Re:Donald Becker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your commands are wrong
      cd /usr/src/linux
      grep -r "Donald Becker" *

    12. Re:Donald Becker by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Donald Becker ... numerical constants everywhere"

      Rikki Don't Lose That Number.

    13. Re:Donald Becker by PitaBred · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Dan Beckers... oh :)

    14. Re:Donald Becker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His code was good enough for me (a novice C programmer) to modify it for a new card that wasn't supported. Thanks to both him and Bogdan Costescu, the card is now supported in 2.6.8.

    15. Re:Donald Becker by shfted! · · Score: 1

      Now just imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beckers! NICs would cower in fear!

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    16. Re:Donald Becker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Donald Beckers!

    17. Re:Donald Becker by cortana · · Score: 1

      My particular brand of obsessive compulsive disorder compells me to award you with the Useless Use of Cat award. Consider the following replacements:

      grep -r 'Donald Becker' /usr/src/linux
      grep -ri becker /usr/src/linux

      Hold on, you've unpacked your kernel source to /usr/src/linux/! Eww! How, 1995 :)

    18. Re:Donald Becker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      cd /usr/src/linux
      grep -r "Donald Becker" .
    19. Re:Donald Becker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't anyone do this the 'right way' (tm) any more?

      cd /usr/src/linux
      find . -type f | xargs grep 'Donald Becker' /dev/null

    20. Re:Donald Becker by Derf_X · · Score: 1
      Seems I am not the only one who though of him.

      The reason I remember his name is because on almost every single Slackware box that I see boot, I see his name when the ethernet module is loaded. I said Slackware because it is the only distribution that I know of that displays what is really going on when booting.

      I remember the Linksys thing that an other poster mentionned, I was in the same boat and he made the tulip driver work with the new cards. He does amazing work. And I am not a programmer, nor a sysadmin, just your regular computer geek.

    21. Re:Donald Becker by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1
      Just in /drivers there are 232 comments with his name.

      That sounds like a good nomination. He's done a lot, but I've heard about him only a little.

    22. Re:Donald Becker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hear, hear.

      I note the responses seem to echo the family guy notion of humor through repetition:

      First time (parent): funny
      Second time: not funny
      Third time: not funny
      Fourth time: a little funny
      fifth time: not funny
      sixth time: really not funny

      If the pattern holds, this post will be modded "+4 Funny".

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Donald Beckers.

      Oh well. Worth a shot.

    23. Re:Donald Becker by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1
      Donald Becker started working on clustering Linux machines. He was one of the original founders of Beowulf, without which Slashdot would lose a lot of its culture.

      Not to mention some of its usernames. Donald Becker, I salute you.
    24. Re:Donald Becker by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Isn't /usr/src/linux just supposed to be a symlink to where ever you unpacked you source? that's how i've got it set up and grep -r 'Donald Becker' /usr/src/linux would certianly work.

    25. Re:Donald Becker by cortana · · Score: 1

      Not since 1996 or so. :)

      Of course, you are free to unpack anything wherever you want on your own system, but the "proper way" is to have /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build be a symlink to your kernel headers.

      That way, any kernel modules you compile will know exactly where to find the source for any installed kernel version, without user intervention. Unfortunately a lot of software still looks in /usr/src/linux (cough Nvidia), needlessly making it harder for Joe Bloggs to download and run the Nvidia graphics drivers installer.

      Strictly speaking, /usr/src/linux should contain the kernel headers that your installed libc was compiled against. See http://www.linuxmafia.com/faq/Kernel/usr-src-linux -symlink.html for more information, straight from the horse's mouth.

    26. Re:Donald Becker by nhtshot · · Score: 1

      I should have known that by posting anything resembling a command that I'd get a barrage of suggestions on how to do it better. It's amazing how a slashdot thread about code authors can turn into a bash commentary. :)

  18. Some people may not like this selection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Branden Robinson and Debian's X Strike Force.

    For all the crap I'm sure he's had to put up with, I gotta give him props for his effort. Thanks, Branden!

    1. Re:Some people may not like this selection... by ShOOf · · Score: 1

      This is who I was gonna nominate, him and the X Strike Force have put up with a lot of crap but continue to keep the X packages rolling and I look forward to X.org packages rolling into Debian.

    2. Re:Some people may not like this selection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would also be my vote... XFree86 seems to works so great in Debian (i386). They also make a wonderful job on other platforms.

      The X-Strike forces has all the merit.

      Thanks a WHOLE LOT!

    3. Re:Some people may not like this selection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a nice cup of "Shut the Fuck Up"?

      (For those about to mod me offtopic, that was the slogan on the main image on Branden's homepage for a good long while. I can understand the sentiment, but it's hardly the most effective way to advance his nomination for DPL.)

    4. Re:Some people may not like this selection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He seems to really be lacking in emotional maturity. While I have never personally had a run-in with him, the examples that I have seen on the net make me want to resign from Debian.

      My time is valuable. If I am going to be contributing it for free, I would like to think I will be dealing with people who know how to have a constructive discussion and not libel my name on the Internet. I refuse to take part in discussions where the loudest and most obnoxious person wins.

      It really discourages people who have a professional reputation to maintain not to get mixed up with these sorts.

    5. Re:Some people may not like this selection... by ISayWeOnlyToBePolite · · Score: 1

      Branden ROCKS!

  19. Riastradh by johnnyb · · Score: 1

    For helping out all of us Schemer's learn the more advanced stuff on IRC. I don't think the guy ever sleeps!

  20. Heres to you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Papa John, Dominoes, Pizza Hut, and the #1 Super China Buffet delivery guy! They make it possible. As well as Corona. but i digress.

    1. Re:Heres to you! by Breity · · Score: 0

      Right On! i know my delivery drivers by name, and they know to walk on in. Course, one of em is me little brother... Not so little anymore :(

      --
      Blame it on ElGeeko De Generico [generic geek]
    2. Re:Heres to you! by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Hey! You left out Starbucks, Mountain Dew, Jolt and to a lesser extent, Slurm. Of course none of it would be possible without my muse: Natalie Portman, naked, petrified . . . you know the rest.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Heres to you! by cmstremi · · Score: 1

      It's starting to sdound like a "Real Men of Genius"/"Real American Hero" ad. :-)

      Here's to you, mister super-linux-kernel-debugger!

    4. Re:Heres to you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you don't live in the western US. It's all about Round Table Pizza. Costs about twice as much as Dominoes and it's worth every penny.

  21. Calm down! by doodlelogic · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you are nice to people, they will help you in return. The theory of co-operation is what open-source is all about. Slashdot mods themselves perhaps deserve an award, can't be easy browsing at 0 or -1 to spot the gems among the AC's.

    p.s. yfi

  22. Larry Jones & Mark Baushke, CVS mailing list g by tcopeland · · Score: 4, Informative

    Both those guys have answered countless questions ranging from the sublime (complex branching problems) to the ridiculous (why doesn't WinCVS work for me?). Props also to Derek Price, who does the releases.

    All the more kudos go to these guys since CVS is slowly being superceded by Subversion; Derek, Larry, and Mark are essentially doing the thankless job of legacy tech support.

  23. Russ Nelson by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hesitated for about two seconds before nominating myself. I mean, if I don't believe in myself, who else would, or should?
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:Russ Nelson by tcopeland · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > I hesitated for about two seconds
      > before nominating myself.

      I second this nomination - Russ helps lots of people out on the QMail mailing lists. Props!

    2. Re:Russ Nelson by e9th · · Score: 1

      Yup. If you've ever asked an intelligent question of the qmail list, you know who Russ Nelson is. And he has written and freely given tons of spiffy software to the community.

    3. Re:Russ Nelson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Weren't you the guy who gave us the DOS packet driver collection, that used to be the way we connected our DOS/Windows machines to the Internet?

      Good work, Russ!

      (some of us old guys remember)

    4. Re:Russ Nelson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that! You rock Russ.

    5. Re:Russ Nelson by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Still does! Every McDonald's cash register uses a packet driver to talk to the server. Too bad I don't get a commission off every hamburger sale. Lemme see, a tenth of a penny, $00.001 times billions and billions sold, works out to, gee, a cool million. As if.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    6. Re:Russ Nelson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to nominate Russ Nelson. He showed me that actually sinking so low as to nominate yourself just shows how much courage you have.

      I hereby nominate myself,

      Tels SCNR:)

    7. Re:Russ Nelson by lenos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And not just in the current Dos/Win days.
      I remember 20 years ago when he did drivers for the old Zenith Z100 at http://www.clarkson.edu/

    8. Re:Russ Nelson by Skorpion · · Score: 1

      I would.

    9. Re:Russ Nelson by Tenareth · · Score: 1

      Haha, cool... and I used your packet drivers for quite some time...

      Long time no see...

      -- Keith

      --
      This sig is the express property of someone.
    10. Re:Russ Nelson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Yup. If you've ever asked an intelligent question of the qmail list, you know who Russ Nelson is

      On the other hand, if you've ever asked a STUPID question on the qmail list, you know who Charles Cazabon is :-)

      I dig his style.

    11. Re:Russ Nelson by jefp · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, you could at least have gotten someone else to trade nominations with you. For instance, me!

    12. Re:Russ Nelson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, Cazabon is one smart cookie, but he's raised the bar when it comes to put-downs.

    13. Re:Russ Nelson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freemacs and the clarkson packet drivers made it possible for me to use DOS many years ago. Not sure if that was a good thing...

  24. Sometimes it's the evangelists. by abiggerhammer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I don't think he does much open-source development himself, but the person who introduced me to OSS was a guy named Randall Severy, whom I met through the Artemis Society. His company actually develops proprietary content-management systems, but when I was in the Arctic and needed to do an Internet audio broadcast, he helped me come up with a free, open-source way to do it after our field sysadmin said "no way."

    That incident has always symbolised the entire Open Source movement to me -- distributed thinking and determination coming up with a powerful solution, despite all the naysayers' opinions.

    --
    Dance like nobody's watching. Sing like you're in the shower. Fuck like you're being filmed.
  25. I know one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux Tro..
    oh wait..this is unsung..not sung..ma bad.

  26. I don't know that he's so much a hero, but by Lank · · Score: 2, Informative

    David Cross is definitely one of the lesser known hackers of the world. But he's contributed to FreeBSD and fixed bugs with NFS - he's also doing a little filesystem work in his free time.. He's really the guy that keeps everything running smoothly in the RPI Computer Science Department. So I'll just give him a tip of my hat and be on my way.

    --
    Gotta get me one of these!
    1. Re:I don't know that he's so much a hero, but by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      And if you've ever heard his bit about Stephen Hawking and a prostitute, it's worth a million Linuxes.

      What's that you say? Not the same David Cross?

      Well screw that guy, then.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    2. Re:I don't know that he's so much a hero, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh dear...
      tenure-track faculy position

      you don't have to spell correctly, just consistently
  27. Darl McBride by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Through his and SCO's efforts he has helped explain what Open Source Software is as well as help quantify its value. Thanks to the various lawsuits, I have seen a perception within my company (Celestica) of Open Source from being "Free" (as in beer) to a collaborative effort by many individuals working on the same goal.

    myke

  28. XFree86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont know the names of anyone behind the XFree86 project although it is one of the most important components of an Open Source OS.

  29. Donald Becker by nhtshot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    cd /usr/src/linux
    cat $(find ./) |grep Donald Becker

    or even
    dmesg |grep Donald Becker

    Just in /drivers there are 232 comments with his name.

  30. umm by dotslasher_sri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    umm, the users : )

    1. Re:umm by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Why is it that software clients are always lumped together with drug abusers?

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  31. tomcat developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to thank the tomcat developers for all their hardwork. How long will it take for IIS to get built in session replication and truly open platform? I'm gonna guess, when hell freezes over.

  32. too much freedom? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    Like it or not, RMS is a sung hero of OSS.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:too much freedom? by Skiron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, one of RMS's weaker moments, but if it wasn't for RMS and GCC, I doubt any of us would have any free software at all.

      RMS coding GCC (see The Rebel Code by Gyn Moody) was inspirational... and later on allowed Linus to build his stuff.

      We all owe the man one hell of a lot.

    2. Re:too much freedom? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm glad RMS coded GCC, and EMACs before that. I'm also glad his communist GNU organization counterbalances the robberbarons of the IT landscape. But "free software" means we don't owe him anything. We owe it to ourselves to use his software wisely, and to learn his lessons for ourselves.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:too much freedom? by Skiron · · Score: 1

      I when I said 'owe' I meant as in beer :D We owe him, because what else would there be? So yes, we owe him.

    4. Re:too much freedom? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'd buy RMS a beer, if we were in a bar together. If only for EMACS "doctor.el", which ought to be built into every bottle.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:too much freedom? by k98sven · · Score: 3, Informative

      At the risk of getting flamed.. How about reading the GCC mailing list instead?

      RMS coding GCC (see The Rebel Code by Gyn Moody) was inspirational... and later on allowed Linus to build his stuff.

      While RMS did code gcc in the beginning, I don't feel one should give RMS credit for what it is today.
      The GCC that RMS developed was IMHO amateurish. It was primarily the work done by the people at Cygnus (now Red Hat) who turned GCC into the quality real-world compiler it is today.

      Not to mention that RMS opposed this. He opposed including C++ support, and then opposed supporting it properly, causing the Cygnus ecgs fork.
      (which is now gcc again, since everybody else finally overruled RMS)

      As for Linux, RMS spent a good amount of time back then actively discouraging people from contributing to Linux.. talking about the vaporware Hurd would be so much better and how it was all wasted effort.

      I'd agree we owe a lot to RMS, but not with respect to GCC and Linux. The positive contributions he's made with respect to those two have been cancelled out by his counter-productive dogmatism.
      (Even today, it continues. Many, if not most, GCC developers currently want to re-write parts of the front-end in C++. There are good technical arguments for this, and it's been shown that some code can be simplified greatly that way.

      While most of the GCC steering committe recently said, "OK, well if you can show there are benifits, we're open to the idea". Except RMS who was STRONGLY against the idea. Not for any ideological reason, but simply because RMS doesn't like C++.

      That is simply just terrible leadership.

    6. Re:too much freedom? by xgamer04 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not for any ideological reason, but simply because RMS doesn't like C++.

      If not liking something is not ideological, I don't know what is.

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    7. Re:too much freedom? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      I guess that rules out the OpenBSD team too.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    8. Re:too much freedom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>Not for any ideological reason, but simply because RMS doesn't like C++.
      >If not liking something is not ideological, I don't know what is.

      Well, while that's true, it kind of misses the point.

      People contribute to the GNU project because they agree with RMS' free-software ideas. (if that, even) Not because they agree with his technical ideas.
      The stated goal of the FSF is to promote 'free software', not to promote RMS personal ideas of what is good software.

      So, RMS power mandate only extends to the ideology of free-software. He should understand this, and keep out of technical questions. But he doesn't.

      Linus on the other hand, is very good at staying out of this. He has confidence in that the developers will sort the issues out for themselves and come up with the best technical solution.

      That's why people respect Linux.

    9. Re:too much freedom? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? I play that as background music whenever I'm evangelizing for GNU! So far no converts, though I once had a nice chat with someone about Free Software on the way to the hospital after they stabbed their eardrum with a fork, and another time when they stabbed mine.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:too much freedom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      the #import warning in the objective-c front-end was also annoying.

    11. Re:too much freedom? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Here's why Slashdot moderation is broken: someone scored the parent post "Interesting", and another scored it "Troll". Is it a "Troll" because it called GNU "communist", which it is (a community that shares everything, with no government, no property, and a workers paradise where they own all means of production)? Or because they like the robberbarons? Because they love Stallman? Or hate him? How about requiring some comment to back up any negative mod?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:too much freedom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, FOSS is free market capitalism at it's best. No suing anybody out of existence because they're violating your goverment granted monopoly (there's socialism for you). No underhanded tactics by no allowing your code to be scrutinzed (does anybody actually trust graphics benchmarks anymore?. That means ethical behaviour). The two points are the conerstone of Adam Smith's definition of free market capitalism. Free competition in an ethical manner.

    13. Re:too much freedom? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      RMS isn't just a famous singer; he has written some excellent documentation for some of his important software. This is a talent that's sorely lacking in the entire software industry.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    14. Re:too much freedom? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It's not capitalism, because it's independent of money. FOSS is certainly a free market creature, but it's not capitalism, which requires exclusive ownership of property, not merely to accumulate it, but to create supply/demand differentials across which arbitrage extracts surplus value. By blowing that ratio, FOSS is a model of communal use that is less ownership than exchange. Communism, though not as familiar as in the 20th Century, as it's more worthy of the name than the nationalist socialism of "Communist" rhetoric.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  33. Sven Guckes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tireless promoter of Mutt and Vim, and a really nice guy even after all these years of abuse from the n00bs.

    1. Re:Sven Guckes by jrschulz · · Score: 1

      Tireless promoter of Mutt and Vim, and a really nice guy even after all these years of abuse from the n00bs.

      Nice guy? Not in public. And some time ago he has shut down his site about his mutt configuration because he wants to enforce the work on bark, a new mailclient to come.
  34. Myk Melez, for Forumzilla by berniegoetz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Without a doubt, this (http://forumzilla.mozdev.org/) has made my online life easier... Thanks, Myk!

  35. Sorry.... by Tingler · · Score: 1

    But you ain't a hero until you have an action figure made in your likeness.

    Booyah!

  36. Jim Trocki by sbackholm · · Score: 1

    Jim Trocki would be near the top of my list. Jim is the creator of mon http://www.kernel.org/software/mon/ and he uses vi.

  37. Bram Moolenaar... by kahei · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the author of vim.

    I have no idea what kind of software that 'Stallman' fellow has written, although I wish him luck -- maybe his project will catch on.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:Bram Moolenaar... by AxelTorvalds · · Score: 1

      And a-a-p... The coolest make replacement. a-a-p.

    2. Re:Bram Moolenaar... by jobsagoodun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Stallman wrote GCC and an editor thingy called emacs which suffers from not being vim!

    3. Re:Bram Moolenaar... by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1
      I fully agree that VIM is an excellent contribution to Open Source.

      I use it on Windows, Linux, Solaris and HP/UX ubiquitously.

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    4. Re:Bram Moolenaar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GCwhat? don't you all compile your kernels with Visual C++?

    5. Re:Bram Moolenaar... by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      GVIM keeps my world sane as it enables me to write code on Sun, Linux and Windows. Works like a champ.

      Following scripts are really useful :
      - taglist.vim
      - wintagexplorer.vim
      - winmanager.vim
      - winfileexplorer.vim
      - SearchComplete.vim
      - selectbuf.vim
      - bufexplorer.vim
      - python.vim
      - cppcomplete.vim

    6. Re:Bram Moolenaar... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      Where are the superheroes when you need them...

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    7. Re:Bram Moolenaar... by rogabean · · Score: 1

      Man am I ever sick of hearing /.'ers dog Emacs... I still swear by Emacs on a daily basis.

      I'm gonna give a nomination to Stallman for Emacs which luckily does not suffer from being vim.

      and no this is not a troll or flamebait. It's my honest opinion.

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    8. Re:Bram Moolenaar... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Man am I ever sick of hearing /.'ers dog Emacs... I still swear by Emacs on a daily basis.

      Most of us swear at emacs, which explains the dogging.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  38. my vote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alexander Viro, a linux kernel hacker.
    Know mainly for being the "VFS maintainer", he's a great C coder. He's also know for being a "bit" tough with bad code (and with people who write it). I (and may other people) admire him, because of things like this: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8 &c2coff=1&safe=off&selm=891kot%247uj%40weyl.math.p su.edu&rnum=1

  39. WGET!!! by cexshun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hrvoje Niksic
    Designed and implemented Wget.
    Personally, I feel wget is the greatest software every to hit the GNU/Linux desktop!

    1. Re:WGET!!! by Nimrangul · · Score: 1

      I prefer ftp; the one supplied with OpenBSD is able to do ftp and http and it is so much nicer than the one that comes with the Redhats. The guys that did the revamping of the OpenBSD ftp deserve some mad props.

      --
      I'm sick of following my dreams - I'm just going to ask them where they're going and hook up with them later.
    2. Re:WGET!!! by dublin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Designed and implemented Wget.
      Personally, I feel wget is the greatest software every to hit the GNU/Linux desktop!


      I'd have to go with Daniel Stenberg of cURL fame in this category. If you are still using wget, then try cURL. A lot of people only know wget, and that's a shame, because cURL is better in almost every possible dimension: see the table comparing cURL to wget and others to see for yourself. Not only that, but cURL is much more actively maintained and improved than wget.

      While wget isn't a bad place to start, it's good to know there is a far more powerful alternative out there.

      And, of course, it's part of far more than just Linux desktops - Apple even saw fit to make it part of OS X, and I routinely use it on XP, my own desktop OS of choice, as well several Linux and BSD-based servers.

      It's an incredibly useful and valuable piece of code, and will become even more so in the future...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    3. Re:WGET!!! by serial+frame · · Score: 1
      Actually, afaik, the NetBSD and OpenBSD ftp clients are one in the same, written by Luke Mewburn of much NetBSD fame. (It also appears in SuSE.) He's also responsible for NetBSD's mad elite /etc/rc.d mechanism.

      Mad props to lukem.

      --

      -
      And the Angel said unto me, "These are the cries of the carrots! The cries of the carrots!"
    4. Re:WGET!!! by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

      But curl has no recursive download, and we all know what wget gets used most for:

      Recursive download of *.jpg

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
    5. Re:WGET!!! by JakeThompson1 · · Score: 1

      Curl is also used by TaxCut for auto-updates.

      At tax-time I had a time installing TaxCut onto NT4 (screws up unless IE6 is installed) and I noticed that one of the included DLLs is "libcurl.dll"

    6. Re:WGET!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but the lack of recursive download is a pretty big minus - I use that frequently for downloading material like tutorials.

      Besides, wget does allow manually setting HTTP headers, so some of the things not specifically supported can nonetheless be used, e.g negotiation or specifying partial ranges.

    7. Re:WGET!!! by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

      He has also done a lot of valuable Emacs work.

    8. Re:WGET!!! by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Personally, I feel wget is the greatest software every to hit the GNU/Linux desktop!

      That's pretty funny, but it's a good example of the kind of software you should be able to get your hands on without buying it IMO.
      I remember back on Windows using WebWhacker (IIRC) to download full web pages/sites for browsing offline. Then I guess when it became popular it was no longer free (as in freeware). I couldn't find a free solution to do what I wanted anymore.

      Enter wget. It does all that WebWhacker did and more at no cost *and* I have the source code to make changes if I want. F--kin A man.

  40. LTSP by fencerf · · Score: 1

    Jim McQuillan deserves a lot of thanks for making such a solid product. He is most helpful.

    --
    Join me in iClod. (http://www.iclod.com/)
    1. Re:LTSP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell yes, Jim rocks.

  41. In the KDE world... by sultanoslack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We basically have no heros in the sense of this article. Despite being one of the largest (quite possibly the largest) and most visible OSS comunities it's become something of a distinctive property of our community that we don't have someone that's out there making a lot of noise.

    I'm not sure what really defines a hero; in fact most of our "heros" in the F/OSS community probably aren't those who have contributed the most. More often they're just the guys that are stark-raving-mad and don't want anyone to miss the circus.

    1. Re:In the KDE world... by Hinhule · · Score: 1

      I think we have a guy working in marketing posting here.

  42. I vote for Chad Dickerson by smitty45 · · Score: 1

    Chad's columns and weblog prove that CTOs do NOT have to be PHBs, or void of coding skills. He basically brought OpenSource to a good part of the online publishing world.

    http://weblog.infoworld.com/dickerson/

    There's still some of his code running on Salon's mod_perl-based publishing system.

  43. The USSG at Indiana University by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The Unix Systems Support Group at Indiana University for spending thousands upon thousands of dollars a year to get software into the hands of people around the world.

  44. if you want fame and fortune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then why are you involved in a policy that is inherently collective. open source is not about heros or singing about them, open source is a form of generosity, if you expect something in return then you're barking up the wrong tree.

    the best work is a labor of love, enjoying what you do is worth more than all the worlds' accolades. if your effort is genuine and your contribution is worthy then you will be reccognized without having to flap your flippers.

  45. Bram and Patrick - The Old Guard by orbitor · · Score: 1

    Where would any of us be without Vim? And the one of best Unix like, zealot neutral, Linux distribution on the planet?

  46. Playing Cards by jomegat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it'd be cool to have a deck of playing cards featuring Open Source Heros. Like the deck the U.S. made featuring Saddam et al.

    --

    In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.

    1. Re:Playing Cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's a great analogy. I can see Microsoft putting out a deck of "the 52 Most Wanted Open-Source Subversives".

  47. best free software hero, ever? by TurtlesAllTheWayDown · · Score: 1

    Former United States President John F. Kennedy!

  48. CmdrTaco!! by IncarnadineConor · · Score: 1

    I'm not above sucking up for some easy karma.

    1. Re:CmdrTaco!! by flossie · · Score: 1
      CmdrTaco!!

      I'm not above sucking up for some easy karma.

      Missing option; CowboyNeal is going to be mad at you for missing him out. Kiss your karma goodbye ...

  49. Sourceforge by mmmmmhotpants · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sourceforge bridged the gap between open source projects and the general public.

    It gave coders the resources they needed to get multi-coder open-source projects to the public.

    It gave the public the resources they needed to find the solutions they need and interact with the coders.

    --

    can't sleep. clowns will eat me.
    1. Re:Sourceforge by Professor+Cool+Linux · · Score: 1

      where is the moderation option for Amen when you need it.

  50. Re:Heros? Check ego at door! by Stud1y · · Score: 1

    oh, havens no, someone who writes code for a living...! seriously. i like my paycheck. why would i want to give away all my work?

  51. Mark Lord. by genixia · · Score: 1

    The success of Linux in the early days owed much its stability and the fact that it could be relied on to not corrupt data. The IDE subsystem *just worked*.

    Mark Lord wrote the original IDE drivers and also hdparm.

    1. Re:Mark Lord. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just took a course from the man. Props to him, he is an endless font of knowledge and stories.

      TFOAE

  52. I wish they'd had this sooner. by techno-vampire · · Score: 5, Interesting
    My nominee is the late Daniel J. Alderson, of JPL. Everything he wrote was Open Source, because that's the way JPL works. Until fairly recently, they were still using the system he wrote to maneuver spaceprobes, although it waasn't his program that caused the crash on Mars. His software navigated Project Voyager out of the Solar System and into intersteller space. It maneuvered Voyager I behind Titan, giving us the first measurment of its atmosphere.

    When he lost his sight to diabetes, I acted as his caregiver and "seeing eye person." I helped him write software tools and subroutines for general use in Project Voyager. I watched him move bytes around absolute memory addresses in FORTRAN 77, although the language was supposed to prevent this. He was, as Jerry Pournelle once wrote, "the sane genius." He died in 1988, but he's still one of the greats in my book and in that of everybody who knew him.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:I wish they'd had this sooner. by Skiron · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thanks, great bit of history. Makes us all humble really, doesn't it?

      A google reveals this snippet too The Alderson Drive

    2. Re:I wish they'd had this sooner. by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's Dan. I've seen the several pages of differential equations he came up with to describe them. He was also Dr. Dan Forrester in Lucifer's Hammer, and the man between the Horders and the Wasters in Inferno.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:I wish they'd had this sooner. by ralphus · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that great story. I was unaware of Daniel. I now think you are lucky to have worked with him.

      --
      Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
  53. I LOVE YOU GUYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thread bought tears to my eyes. This is what its all about. I LOVE YOU GUYS.

    Nowhere else they understand the value/idea/efforts of OSS. This is where I come to get that mutual nod.

    *sobs hysterically*

  54. Re:Closed source devs? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why's that flamebait?

    Most of the most brilliant programmers out there did it for a paycheck every week.

    Is the guy who wrote mIRC less worthy of respect than the guy who maintains X-chat? At least he was smart enough to be able to make a carreer out of his hobby, and is the guy most responsible for the popularity of IRC in the first place.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  55. Re:Darl McBride / Second this by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree. A while back we were upgrading our Unixware servers and got invited to a resellers function where many people were spouting Darls script. At the time my boss thought linux = atari or something. Afterwards, he said "wow, they're a bunch of rabid nuts" regarding the scox team. We upgraded to RH Enterprise.
    Thanks, Darl...you make Linux what it is

  56. Heroes? by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1

    Richard M Stallman and all his GNU band. Linus Torvalds. The softwares I use everyday are: 1. Linux Kernel 2.6.8 2. Emacs 3. GNU Bash 4. GNU Coreutils 5. Mozilla (firefox/thunderbird) Also, I'd like to thank all the Fedora developers. Hoping to see Core 3 soon :-)

  57. Great thought! by Skiron · · Score: 1

    All clap everybody!

    The more you think about it, the more you realise more work and man hours has gone into GNU/Linux/FOSS than it did to send man to the moon!

  58. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gratitude is a part of the phenomenon in some way.
    If you use/contribute, you are a part of a collective.
    If you contribute you are appreciated even if nobody knows
    explicitly your name.

    The satisfaction should come from the context, I guess...

    But I can imagine that from an individualistic point
    of view this is a big dilemma...

    I am to tired now to dive deep into politics
    and philosophy... sorry...

  59. Jim WIlkinson by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've read articles saying how the Open Source movement started in the early 1990's, or some such blather. But numerical analysts have been putting software into the public domain for almost 5 decades. The ACM, for example, have been publishing code since 1960. And look at LAPACK, EisPack, SparSpak, and no and on and on. And the tradition continues to this day.

    Okay, want a name? How about Jim Wilkinson one of the fathers of modern numerical computation. Maybe not unsung, example, but perhaps unknown to most /.'s.

    1. Re:Jim WIlkinson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some of us still remember Gene Golub, Charles Van Loan, Jack Dongarra, James Ortega. Great minds!

      -pavlos

  60. Branden Robinson by psavo · · Score: 1

    Come on, the man who've kept packaging steaming pile of XFree86 for 11 debian architectures. While upstream supported only i386.

    (Yup, I do know that he is sharp with his tongue)

    --
    fucktard is a tenderhearted description
  61. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OSS isn't about fame and fortune, right? You supposed to write code because you believe software wants to be free (as in beer).

  62. D. Richard Hipp For SQLite by kubed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    D. Richard Hipp created SQLite, which is now bundled with PHP5. He gives very detailed, personal responses to any questions on the SQLite mailing list. Very nice software and very good support. Thanks Hippster!

  63. List all them? by BRSloth · · Score: 5, Informative

    This will be a troublesome task! There is lots and lots of people that work on a large project and just one guy, with one patch, changed the way the program behave to make it the most useful program yet born. And they don't walk the street with "I wrote that patch" t-shirts.

    Maybe some of the unsung heroes really like to remain unsung. And we all just see the PR guys in front of it.

    I could list some of guys in the front of it, but I would let a lot of people that really deserve the credits because of it.

    Tim Ney (X.org), Keith Packard (Eye-candy master), Havoc Pennington (DBUS hacker), Jeff Waugh (one of the guys behind the change of GNOME), Owen Tayler (GTK maintainer), Guido Von Rossum (Python).

    Also all the Mozilla people, all the GCC people, all the Apache people, all the PHP people, all the people I left out in the GNOME project, all the people I left out in the Python project.

    I could go on and on and on and would not list everyone that really deserves. Just expanding the people in the "All the foo project" listed above would create a really big list.

    1. Re:List all them? by Timodious · · Score: 1

      ...they don't walk the street with "I wrote that patch" t-shirts. ThinkGeek, are you listening? I'd buy that shirt...

  64. Re:Closed source devs? by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, they deserve our respect, but they get their reward in the money we pay for their work. If you want to get them some public kudos, why not submit an article asking for their names?

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  65. Mike Rubel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mike Rubel, for developing a simple method to take NetApp style snapshot backups on any Linux server.

    http://www.mikerubel.org/computers/rsync_snapshots /index.html

  66. Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Putting BSD on the Mac was another brilliant move by Apple.

    Just buy a mac :-)

    1. Re:Steve Jobs by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

      The topic is " Unsung Heroes of Open Source Software", all of the verbal fellatio that Mac zealots heap upon him has permanently disqualified him from that characterization.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  67. Wrong! :A True Open Source Hero is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP. For making proprietary printer software that pissed RMS off.

    Those who don't know their history are doomed to repeat it.

    1. Re:Wrong! :A True Open Source Hero is... by boots@work · · Score: 1

      It was Xerox, not HP. Read your history.

      HP might well have been doing the same, but it happened to be a Xerox printer in that case. But now they have lovely open source^W^Wfree inkjet drivers.

  68. John Levon, the LyX Qt don, gets my nod by anandrajan · · Score: 1

    Without John Levon, there is no (present day) Qt GUI for LyX - The Document Processor. And I, along with many others found the earlier XForms GUI for LyX to be unusable. Thanks John for making LyX usable.

    --
    Anand Rangarajan anand@cise.ufl.edu
    1. Re:John Levon, the LyX Qt don, gets my nod by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's not forget Donald Knuth for TeX which powers it all, and Leslie Lamport for the LaTeX macros. And of course, Bram Moolenaar for my preferred authoring environment.

      Also cheers to the folks behind EMBOSS and those behind the R project. Wayne Rasband for ImageJ, and all responsible for SciLab. Thanks to everyone for making science (more) fun. :)

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:John Levon, the LyX Qt don, gets my nod by KjetilK · · Score: 1
      You're welcome! :-)

      (I'm somewhere in the R contributions file. A very small contribution, but I'm grateful for being included)

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  69. Real Men of Genius... by wildwood · · Score: 1

    For purposes of organization, all "Real Men of Genius" parodies should be posted under this thread.

    This one's for you, Mister Netcraft-Confirms-It's-Dead Guy.

    --
    normal(adj)- people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots [DECS]
    1. Re:Real Men of Genius... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      Here's to you, Mr. Organizer-of-real-men-of-genius-posts.

      Mr. Organizer-of-real-men-of-genius-posts

      You spend minutes toiling away trying to bring order to chaos. Grinding your fingers to the bone.

      Grind down those digits!

      Without you, there'd be scattered ramblings all over the site, with no real rhyme or reason

      it's like that every day now...

      So crack open a cold bud light and relax, you've made slashdot safe.......for parodies.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  70. I nominate the BSA. by dameron · · Score: 1

    I know they've done more to drive the adoption of open source software in my workpalce than anything I could have done with catch as catch can advocacy.

    Thanks for the audit BSA! I could never have moved our 80% of our servers and 15% of our desktops to Linux without you.

    -dameron

    ---- DailyHaiku.com, saying more in 17 syllables than Big Media says all day.

    1. Re:I nominate the BSA. by gg3po · · Score: 0

      I wasn't aware that the Boy Scouts of America were such a group of hard-core hackers.

      --
      ---
  71. I vote for Bill Joy by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Bill Joy deserves more credit than he gets. After all, he invented "vi", part of the FreeBSD release. Without vi, no source code would ever have been written!

    1. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      clearly you don't remember ed.
      Imagine typing gcc in that.....

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by tntguy · · Score: 1

      There's always cat(1).

    3. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and without notepad there wouldnt be any windows programs...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    4. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      For those who will know no humor and have mod-points: If its impossible to write software (and thus text-editors) for unix without vi, where did vi come from? Stone discs given from god?

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by lcde · · Score: 1

      Yeah everyone would be too busy figuring out the commands in emacs :D

      --
      :%s/teh/the/g
    6. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by ^Case^ · · Score: 1
      Without vi, no source code would ever have been written!
      I guess vi just spawned right out of random fluctuations in bad memory then? Or perhaps he wrote it directly in machine code? ;-)
    7. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by IckySplat · · Score: 1

      Ummm Yes actually

      The VI source was handed down on several silicone
      tablets. The are currently stored in my basement.

      They will shortly be available on eBay :)

      --
      Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
    8. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, thats emacs. Vi comes from the other direction.

    9. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here are a couple of links to Bill Joy interview content which explains some things about the origins of vi. Basically it came from the fact that ed was bloody unusable and if you had a glass terminal with cursor control, which was most of them (though some needed a ROM revision - that's not mentioned, though ROMs for uppercase are) then clearly it made more sense to have a screen editor, not a line editor.

      It's amazing to think that vi is actually easier to use than something else, though I used edlin before I ever discovered Unix, it was probably the second or third editor I ever used. I'd used ed on the amiga, both in the classic ed mode and the visual mode, and much better editors on that platform as well. I had to read the ms-dos manual in order to figure out how to use edlin, but I was a kid at the time so I have an excuse. I fixed some problem with the neighbor's dos pc, they were amazed :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by Nailer · · Score: 1

      Without vi, no source code would ever have been written!

      Why do you think that? Surely another editor would have come about.

    11. Re:I vote for Bill Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Joy also deserves recognition of the left wing paranoid nut that he is.

  72. Open Source Heros by Suriel · · Score: 0

    Anyone that spends more than 100 hours on a client side javascript web application (with an XML datasource) just to see it featured on another corporate site code verbatim without any mention of the original author or the originating corporation (the only two comments they stripped out) in the code behind... Dave, this one's for you.

  73. http://66.35.250.150 anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many thanks to Paul Vixie, who's biography can be found here , and accomplishments include:

    - technical architect of DNS/BIND
    - founder of the ISC (Internet Software Consortium)
    - cofounder of MAPS (blackhole)
    - CIX router ace & CIX-W maintainer
    and many others.

    1. Re:http://66.35.250.150 anyone? by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      not to mention vixie cron (vcron).

      --
      Jeremy
    2. Re:http://66.35.250.150 anyone? by Naikrovek · · Score: 1

      no, that's Paul Vixie.

    3. Re:http://66.35.250.150 anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who's biography can be found

      "whose".

    4. Re:http://66.35.250.150 anyone? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Hall of infamy perhaps.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    5. Re:http://66.35.250.150 anyone? by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about?? We're TALKING about Paul Vixie!

      --
      Jeremy
  74. Nigel Cunningham by grub- · · Score: 1

    Nigel Cunningham of the Software Suspend project. I've been using this on my laptop for a long time now, and it works great. He's kept development active and is very helpful. definitely makes my laptop more useable. kudos to Nigel!

    Russ

    --
    What do the good know...except what the bad teach them in their excesses? - Clive Barker
  75. Vic Abell, lsof author by bee · · Score: 1

    Vic Abell at Purdue, the author of lsof, is my favorite unsung open source hero. He was my boss's boss when I worked at Purdue, and he used to use my workstation to test out lsof on the latest AIX version.

    --
    At least mafia-owned pizzarias make excellent pizza. Compare to Bill Gates.
  76. The Unknown Coder by holzp · · Score: 0

    The Unknown Coder.

    To all those about to compile, we salute you.

  77. Dave Chappelle by mrhandstand · · Score: 1

    no, seriously. He mentioned Linux on his late night gig. A popular entertainer mentions Linux, that is a major step towards bringing the ideas of OSS to the mainstream, non-IT culture.

    --
    Always value the individual over the system. --Bruce Lee "I don't need a Sig - I have a custom 191" - me
    1. Re:Dave Chappelle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charlie Murphy, what did the hand say to the face?

  78. To the unknown Coder by wertarbyte · · Score: 1

    I propose the creation of a virtual monument, dedicated to the unknown coder, who brought endless lines of code into our open source projects.
    We salute you, faceless hackers of the light side!
    Oh look, the-unknown-coder.org is still available...I guess it won't be in a couple of minutes from now?

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
    1. Re:To the unknown Coder by IckySplat · · Score: 1

      Damned good idea actually.

      Sort of a memorial to those we've lost on those
      long death marches.

      --
      Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
  79. Kasper Skårhøj - TYPO3 Creator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy created a full CMS almost alone! Looks at the Features list !

  80. Re:Heros? Check ego at door! by sultanoslack · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your stereotype is all wrong. Most OSS developers are 20-30 and are either university students or full-time IT professionals. Here's just one survey that I dug up quickly.

    OSS developers survey

  81. john carmack by big+daddy+kane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    although his influence on open source in general may not be as large as some of the heavy hitters, he not only opensources his engines after they become less liscensed, but also supports the open source graphics libary, open gl.

    1. Re:john carmack by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      the open source graphics libary, open gl.

      OpenGL is a graphics API, and there are many closed-source implementations, for example binary-only drivers for video cards. It is an open standard meaning it's possible to make opensource implementations such as Mesa.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  82. DO NOT CLICK- DISGUSTING IMAGE by garbletext · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    WARNING

    1. Re:DO NOT CLICK- DISGUSTING IMAGE by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Informative

      Parent is referring to some post that's been modded to oblivion, and now it looks like he's warning against the original poster. Those links (to opensource.org) are fine; disregard.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:DO NOT CLICK- DISGUSTING IMAGE by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      That's why you should always read at -1 and get the whole story!

  83. SCO is my favorite open-source unsung hero. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Linux kernel contains a ton of their code, yet they get none of the glory except for my $699 licensing fee.

  84. Rob Flynn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who doesn't use Gaim?

  85. Question: by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why pose this question towards Open Source developers only?

    Seriously, do all of the other developers out there already get enough credit? I'm pretty sure that for the most part, Open Source developers are already MUCH more visible than your average closed-source developer.

    I'm certainly not attempting to detract from OS developers, but I really don't see the point in drawing a line here except to open up some sort of this camp is better than that camp can of worms.

    --
    No Comment.
    1. Re:Question: by binford2k · · Score: 1

      Because proprietary developers get paid for their work, and one of the theories as to why open source developers work for free is for the notoriety.

    2. Re:Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why pose this question towards Open Source developers only?

      Hmm... let's see. On the one hand, you have a bunch of people who share the blueprints for their software with the community, and on the other you have a bunch of people who hide away their work and only let us see the end-product for a price. I'm not sure one group can be labelled as "heroes" really.

      Oh, and to the other commenter: open-source developers can get paid for their work as well.

    3. Re:Question: by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      I'm certainly not attempting to detract from OS developers, but I really don't see the point in drawing a line here except to open up some sort of this camp is better than that camp can of worms.

      I have nothing against closed-source developer -- I've even been one from time to time.

      However, closed source developers are doig their job for money. They get renumeration by seeing the numbers in their bank account increase every few weeks. And they may get recognition inside their company as well for a job well done.

      Open Source developers, by and large, don't make any money for their code, and don't win any awards. They often work just as hard as the closed source developer, but don't make much (if any) money for their efforts, don't get a yearly bonus, and don't get a plaque to hand on their wall for a job well done.

      I personally felt it was time to recognise some of these people for the work they've done which we've benifitted from, even if in a very small way.

      Yaz.

    4. Re:Question: by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Open Source developers, by and large, don't make any money for their code, and don't win any awards

      That may be true for the average 10 line perl script found on sourceforge, but any OS developer that has developed a worthwhile piece of software is going to at least indirectly make money off of that product.

      Linus is a millionare. Larry Wall is probably comfortable off of royalties from the Oreily books. Knuth is a professor. Also, many professionals that work for companies like HP, IBM, and SGI are paid to write opensource software.

      Anyway on topic, I can thank all of the Linux and opensource projects that I use daily and have had the opportunity to read their source code. I learned how to program in C from reading OS code, and I feel as though I had excellent teachers. When I was a developer for the Windows platform (low point in my life) it killed me that I could not find any worthwhile examples or source code for the MS platform. I've always felt more at home with the OSS community because they provide answers when people ask questions.

    5. Re:Question: by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      That may be true for the average 10 line perl script found on sourceforge, but any OS developer that has developed a worthwhile piece of software is going to at least indirectly make money off of that product.

      I call bullshit on you! :).

      Seriously -- some big projects with lots of users which re-implement things already available in the closed-source world which are very well established will do well. But there are lots of big and esoteric projects out there, and many of the developers of these projects are probably never going to get much of anything for their efforts.

      I was lucky to be asked to speak about my project at the Wrox Wireless Developers Conference in Amsterdam back in June 2000, which paid $1500 USD as a speakers fee. Other than that and a dinner a satisfied user paid for after a users group meeting, I have never made anything in the 7 years I've been working on my project.

      And this isn't a 10-line Perl script either -- this is a Java project consisting of over 200 classes, with side projects in both Java and C for various platforms.

      It's too bad Wrox got out of the conference business shortly after the one in Amsterdam -- that was one pretty sweet deal :).

      Brad BARCLAY
      Lead Developer & Project Administrator,
      The jSyncManager Project.

  86. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    dmesg |grep Donald Becker

    Is Donald Becker connected to yor computer as a peripheral device?

    1. Re:wtf? by Evangelion · · Score: 2, Informative


      rei:/home/iwarford# dmesg | grep -i becker
      ne2k-pci.c:v1.02 10/19/2000 D. Becker/P. Gortmaker
      via-rhine.c:v1.10-LK1.1.13 Nov-17-2001 Written by Donald Becker


      Comments are printed out sometimes.

    2. Re:wtf? by BJH · · Score: 1

      The point he was trying to make was that

      dmesg | grep Donald Becker

      will get you:

      grep: Becker: No such file or directory

      The correct way to do it would be

      dmesg | grep "Donald Becker"

    3. Re:wtf? by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      The point he was trying to make was that

      dmesg | grep Donald Becker

      will get you:

      grep: Becker: No such file or directory


      Really? How do you get that out of his post?

  87. Notably absent from the discussion so far by doublegauss · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Don Knuth Apart from nurturing countless computer scientists with The Art of Computer Programming, he donated TeX to the world, which would be enough by itself to grant the man perennial kudos.

    Larry Wall We probably wouldn't have had the Web as we know it without Perl (we wouldn't have had Perl vs Python flamewars either, though).

    1. Re:Notably absent from the discussion so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think you can call Knuth or Wall "unsung." Or Linus, or RMS, &c.

    2. Re:Notably absent from the discussion so far by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Larry Wall We probably wouldn't have had the Web as we know it without Perl

      Hell, you wouldn't have the web as we know it without Vint Cerf.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  88. Nomination by redtux1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mark Finlay (Sisob) Rest in Peace

    Contributions to rhythmbox and driving force behind gnomesupport.org

  89. Jonathan Corbet by rotenberry · · Score: 1

    Jonathan Corbet, the editor of Linux Weekly News (lwn.net).

  90. ADAM ISER IS MY HEROOO!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Evan and the rest of the Adium team!!! WHAT WOULD ADAM ISER DO!?

  91. Daniel Robbins by amightywind · · Score: 1

    'nough said

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  92. Some I can think of by Eloquence · · Score: 4, Informative
    Tim Kosse of FileZilla, the only really good open-source FTP client for Windows I'm aware of. He's currently busy porting it to Linux using wxWidgets (read his development diary).

    The myriads of hackers on KDE and GNOME applications. I'm particularly fond of Kate, KDE's text editor, which is also a component in many other KDE applications.

    Ward Cunningham, the creator of the original wiki idea, and Clifford Adams, the maintainer of one of the first usable wiki engines, UsemodWiki.

    Rusty Foster, Dries Buytaert and Rob Malda, who created Scoop, Drupal and Slash, respectively, three very powerful weblog engines I use every day.

    Spencer Kimball and Peter Mattis for starting the GIMP. Ton Rosendaal and the rest of the Blender team for proving that proprietary applications can become open source through distributed funding.

    Anthony Jones, creator of iRATE, for exploring new ways to discover free music.

    Dave Winer of UserLand for developing a simple content syndication format (now RSS 2.0), the MetaWeblog API and the XML-RPC protocol.

    Keith Packard of HP for his many improvements to X.

    Guido van Rossum for creating Python, Larry Wall for creating Perl and the many people involved in making PHP, and making it useful.

    And of course, the many other people involved in all of these programs, and those who built the software infrastructure that made them possible.

    1. Re:Some I can think of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave Winer of UserLand for developing a simple content syndication format (now RSS 2.0)

      As much as Dave likes to credit himself as the "inventor" of RSS, that honour actually goes to Netscape, who developed it for their My Netscape service.

    2. Re:Some I can think of by Eloquence · · Score: 1

      Before Netscape developed RSS, Dave created the scriptingNews format. Dave/Userland also took up RSS development after Netscape stopped working on it. See RSS history.

    3. Re:Some I can think of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I'm well aware of the fact that he created the scriptingNews format. That's not RSS. I'm also well aware that he republished the Netscape RSS specification with a UserLand copyright attached to the bottom. I'm also aware that he leapfrogged the RSS 1.0 specification by republishing his work as RSS 2.0, labelling the RSS 1.0 developer thieves for infringing upon "his" work. I'm also aware that he applied for a trademark on the term 'RSS' and tries to stop anybody from using the RSS name by forbidding them from doing so in the RSS 2.0 specification and calling them thieves if they do anything even remotely similar.

      What you don't seem to be aware of is the fact that pointing to an RSS timeline written by Dave Winer isn't exactly trustworthy. You also don't seem to be aware of the fact that the UserLand format was nothing special; for instance Microsoft's "channels" were doing a similar thing even earlier, and they weren't even the first on the block.

    4. Re:Some I can think of by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Tim Kosse of FileZilla, the only really good open-source FTP client for Windows I'm aware of. He's currently busy porting it to Linux using wxWidgets (read his development diary).

      I have used and appreciated FileZilla for many years, but ultimately, I have to come down in favor of WinSCP. FileZilla uses old SCP code that makes SSH2 transfers move extremely slowly, whereas WinSCP can take advantage of the current codebase in PuTTY, and FileZilla doesn't support drag-and-drop.

      Also, I'd like to second the Keith Packard thanks, though he isn't all that unsung, at least on Slashdot. Keith had one hell of an uphill battle to get where he was going, but kept plugging away. He's responsible for the user-friendly font selection mechanism in X today (those of us that remember old-style font descriptors will probably agree that there was a significant impediment there to user use). He's responsible for adding the improvements to XFree86 (now xorg) that allowed antialiased text to appear in Linux. I believe he is also responsible for the non-DRM resolution-changing extensions. He's a major reason that the Linux windowing environment hasn't fallen far behind (and if he had been allowed to incorporate his changes earlier, would probably have pushed Linux ahead).

    5. Re:Some I can think of by Eloquence · · Score: 1
      In fairness to all parties involved, I think we can state the following:

      1. There were other formats like CDF, but right from the start, Dave promoted syndication where it mattered, in the nascent Blogosphere, not as part of the doomed "Push" bubble.
      2. Dave and the W3C differ greatly in their vision of what syndication formats should look like. Dave favors simplicity, whereas W3C wants a powerful format to build the entire "semantic web".
      3. Both Dave and the W3C people are interested in exercising control over the leading syndication format. That is, we are talking about a power struggle.
      The combination of these factors led to the messy situation as it is now. We can criticize Dave for his participation in the fight over control, but we can criticize both groups for not coming to a reasonable conclusion like pursuing two different formats with different names. Given that RSS 1.0 is so different from its predecessor, I think it should have become a different format at that point (i.e. a new name).

      I for one prefer to applaud the achievements these groups have made to dwelling on their mistakes, and personally prefer Dave's vision of simplicity to RDF. While I like the expressiveness of RDF, I find it too complex to communicate to the average web developer. I prefer simple, standardized, application-specific XML schemas.

      Dave has proposed to merge Atom and RSS and make them an IETF-controlled standard. This sounds like a good idea, so we would end up with two formats (W3C's RSS and Dave/Atom's RSS-Atom-merge) that are so different as to be irreconcilable.

    6. Re:Some I can think of by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      How about Chris Nandor who continues to improve and extend Slash?

  93. Mikael Hallendal and all the other Imendio hackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because Gossip is quite possibly the best Jabber client ever made.

  94. Steve Balmer for by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 2, Funny

    showing us that even big IT guys can get jiggy with it!

  95. PICK ME PICK ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I shall remain Anonymous in a true spirit of an Open Source :)

  96. I second this. by gimpboy · · Score: 1

    I even donated a little to the charity he suppports. If anyone isn't aware, I know it's hard to miss the splash message, but vim is charitywre. Bram wants doantions to be sent to iccf holland which are used to help children in Uganda. I use this editor every day that I use a computer (which is pretty much every day) and I think it's great that Bram uses his work to help others less fortunate.

    --
    -- john
  97. Zope & Python by TheSync · · Score: 1

    Guido van Rossum for Python

    Jim Fulton for Zope.

  98. whoever wrote string.h by b-lou · · Score: 1

    I have no idea who it was (Linus?), but whoever wrote string.h gets my vote, sung or unsung, just for this line:

    /* Sautee STRING briskly. */
    extern char *strfry (char *__string) __THROW;

    Not a belly laugh, but I found it a very funny distraction when I was deep in some coding project and happened upon it by accident.

    1. Re:whoever wrote string.h by darketernal · · Score: 1

      Look also for memfrob(3) in that same file...

  99. Not really answering your question , but .. by bluFox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is an ancient hindu tradition of creating anonymous works.
    The authors (or the maintainors) never left their names in the body of literature or text. We can only guess at the people who created those ancient texts from other sources. The reasoning for doing that [i guess] was that, the work if it can, will survive because of its own ability and the fame for that work is same as fame for its author.
    It is perhaps the same thing that prompts us to contribute to the OSS - so that we can feel that at least a part of our selves survive through them.

    --
    ~561
    1. Re:Not really answering your question , but .. by sameerd · · Score: 1

      like Bourbaki for Mathematics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolas_Bourbaki

    2. Re:Not really answering your question , but .. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      The authors (or the maintainors) never left their names in the body of literature or text.
      Interesting you should say this, mostly because I really can't think of any Indic author who has done that.

      Oh wait.

      (Seriously, I really can't think of any books with authors like that! Any pointers?)

    3. Re:Not really answering your question , but .. by bluFox · · Score: 1
      How about vedas and upanishads ?, though they speak of people, it never mentions the ones who'd done it :) ,,

      Other than that I dont have any specific works i know of, [mostly because I got the idea from the essays I have read on the subject, and I am unable to check if the authors have really left their name in the works due to my inability to understand classical sanscrit.]

      --
      ~561
    4. Re:Not really answering your question , but .. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Hey, Vedas and Upanishads don't really count! :-)

      But in a way, I guess you have a point; the Vedas were, indeed, a collective work of sorts, and has been known to, for instance, have at least 20 women authors. Then again, it'll be interesting to see if that authorship model scales to, say, the open source model; really dont think the Vedic caucus would have included anything from anyone!

    5. Re:Not really answering your question , but .. by bluFox · · Score: 1
      Hey, even in oss world, not every one has commit rights to every tree.:)

      ps: from here some anonymous texts on astronomy: Candracchayanayanopavah, Chayaganita (four different volumes), and Suryacchayadiganita (two different works), [result of a google search. :) ]
      dont take it as authoritative source.

      --
      ~561
    6. Re:Not really answering your question , but .. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      First of all, I think the link is incredibly selective in its analysis of influences in Indian astronomy. For instance, it talks zilch of the Vedanga Jyotisa, possibly the most influencial astronomical treatise in the 4000 years of Indian astronomy (assuming the Vedas and the related Vedangas were written around 1500 BCE or so). It is also strangely silent on the extra-ordinary influence that Greco-Chaldean traditions, namely the solar calendar, the 12 month-year and the seven-day week, had on Indian astronomical practices. Then again, I guess the author's main intention was to gather together whatever astronomical books he's heard of into one single page, so I guess it's kinda excusable. Just to critique the document histiographically.

      Anyway, from the link:

      Computing the shadow of the Moon aided the calculation of time and planetary positions. Many works were composed on this topic, the major ones being: Candracchyaganita I by Paramesvara, followed by Candracchayaganita II by Nilakantha, and Candracchayaganita III and IV that remain anonymous. Other works include Chayaslaka by Acyuta Pisarati, and three anonymous texts Candracchayanayanopavah, Chayaganita (four different volumes), and Suryacchayadiganita (two different works).
      Note that the Chandra Chaya Ganita (literally the 'Mathematics of the Shadow of the Moon'; you probably knew this already, but just to de-exoticize the name) first two authors are, indeed, known. Even though the dude who wrote this used the A-word, I think he just meant to say that the other two authors are unknown as of now; a bit like we not knowing who the original author of, say, Scarborough Fair is. That's pretty common in many texts and is not usually indicative of a tradition of authors being willingly anonymous.

      Which was my main itch in the first place, really; of the few Sanskrit texts I've read, there have been none where the author seemed to have willingly chosen to remain anonymous; the concept of a 'Sutradhar' (literally 'director', but more accurate to translate here it as 'narrator') was pretty strong back then (even in mathematical texts, incidentally; Leelavati in Bhaskaracharya's works as an example), and most authors used to offer themselves as willing narrators. And indeed, they often used to present themselves as characters of their works, much like Night-saab, Hitchcock and Subhash Ghai these days; both Valmiki and Maharishi Veda Vyas were actual characters in the Ramayana and the Mahabharata respectively.

      This, of course, is not to say that the authors of the CCG III and IV weren't willingly anonymous; just that, it's impossible to tell from this text. It is also not to say that you're wrong in your assertion; quite possibly, it is I who needs to read even more and even further. :-)

      Nevertheless, shameless self-plug time: Many moons ago, I was a student of Indian astronomy. :-)

    7. Re:Not really answering your question , but .. by bluFox · · Score: 1
      I am not at all familiar with indian astronomy , and i'll take your word for it on the dcoument :), as I had noted before, It was just the first result of a google search page, :)

      How ever my contention was that "The authors (or the maintainors - of these texts) never left their names in the body of literature or text." : - which is different from texts like geethagovindam by jayadeva, which says explicitly "Ithi jayadeva virachitham" *In the body of text* with out which the text would remain incomplete.

      I also mentioned that "We can only guess at the people who created those ancient texts from other sources." - which is also to say that people of their time probably knew who the authors were, and recorded them in their own communications or works, much as we know who the author/s of "vi" or "emacs" is even if they dont include the change logs or credits screen. [they do include but try and imagine they dont :)]

      I do not refute your contention " there have been none where the author seemed to have willingly chosen to remain anonymous;" as I have explained above.

      probably this: - "There is an ancient hindu tradition of creating anonymous works." - is the confusing part, If it is, please read it with the explanation above.

      --
      ~561
  100. Everyone who ever contributed to Jakarta projects by gorbachev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The different Jakarta and/or Apache projects are such a valuable resource I can't even begin to evaluate the amount of time and money I've saved over the years using them.

    Most of the applications I'm maintaining on a daily basis use multiple Jakarta Commons components and run on Tomcat. The quality of support from the community far exceeds the quality of support we get for most of our commercial components / products.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  101. The LDP by Enry · · Score: 1

    Everyone who's contributed documentation to the Linux Documentation Project.

  102. Easy by Erwos · · Score: 1

    David Hinds, maintainer and big developer of the PCMCIA packages for Linux.

    That man alone has pretty much made Linux on laptops usable.

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  103. Charles Cazabon by enoor · · Score: 1

    Charles Cazabon, author of getmail, for showing us how an open source project (and the associated mailing lists) ought to be managed.

  104. Darl McBride by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

    Just kidding :P

  105. Luis Villa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    I dont think Luis Villa gets half enough praise for all the thankless work he does keeping Gnome Bugzilla in working order and getting bugs dealt with.

    Bug fixing aint sexy but it is very very necessary.

  106. I got into software development... by 7String · · Score: 1

    ...for all the fame and notoriety that comes with it. Maybe if I develop a killer new algorithm, everyone in the world is gonna be talking about ME!
    I'll be on the cover of "The Inquirer" with my hand on J-Lo's ass, getting into a stretch limo, while wiping the excess blow from my upper lip.
    Yep, that's what software development means to me. Paparazzi, supermodels, and illicit substances!

    --

    It isn't a memory leak. It's an object life-span issue.
  107. TUX by static0verdrive · · Score: 1

    You can't put a price on cute.

    --
    ========
    77 77 77 2e 6d 65 6c 76 69 6e 73 2e 63 6f 6d
    1. Re:TUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you could, it would be a very small or negative amount.

  108. Sam Lantingna libsdl by stonewolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The number one thing holding back Linux on the desktop. The number one person doing something about that is Sam Lantinga. Aside from creating LibSDL, he has helped create a huge, growing, active community that has grown up around LibSDL. They are developing games with LibSDL on pretty much anything that can run a program and porting it to everything else.

    Stonewolf

    www.stonewolf.net

  109. Troll Feeding... by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 0
    Yes, you are right, to a certain extent. However - I would point out that the person whom posed the question did not seek to nominate himself.

    Basically, he was admitting that he was looking for a big thanks while not thanking those who's open-source he-himself used.

    So basically, you either didn't read, didn't get it, or you're trolling on purpose. I hope that it was one of the former choices.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    1. Re:Troll Feeding... by Yaztromo · · Score: 0
      Basically, he was admitting that he was looking for a big thanks while not thanking those who's open-source he-himself used

      Close enough :). I'm not really looking for a "big thanks" -- it's more that sometimes I wonder if there are people out there who are using my code because they apperciate what it does for them or their organization.

      One of the things you find when you develop Open Source software is that typically you only time you hear from users is either when something goes wrong, they they want to suggest a new feature.

      So sometimes I do wonder if anyone apperciates the effort I put into my projects and other projects -- but anytime I enter this frame of thought I can't help but think that there are a whole lot of other Open Source packages my project relies on (either directly or indirectly), and it's not as if I ever take the time to thank them for their efforts.

      My project relies directly on jDOM for XML parsing. It's built using Apache Ant. Source control is handled via CVS. Web access to the source is available through ViewCVS. Our website is served by Apache. Our project is hosted by SourceForge. Our build and some of our test systems run Linux. Serial port access on Linux and OS X is provided by Trent Jarvi's RXTX. The prototype USB support for OS/2 uses NetLabs.org's USB Ring 3 driver code. I've recently been working with a bunch of people to implement javax.usb using libusb. My laptop, which is used for portable development, is a PowerBook G4 running OS X, which contains code from Darwin/FreeBSD.

      There are a lot of people out there who have done work to make my project possible. I believe things are the same for lots of other people here on Slashdot. Maybe we should take one day a year to thank those who have made our software universe better for no other reason, simply because we apperciate their efforts, and not because they're begging for thanks.

      Brad BARCLAY

  110. David Jarvie by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

    David is the kalarm guy. Kalarm may not be the biggest open source project, but his responsiveness about bug reports and feature requests has been amazing.

  111. Caffeine! by dacarr · · Score: 1

    All those companies who make things like Mountain Dew, Red Bull, Jolt, Bawls, and any other caffeinaceous beverage, for without caffeine we can't function.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  112. I dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Knowing vi, I would think that more code would have been written in its absence.

    *dons asbestos suit*

  113. Al Gore by Merk · · Score: 1

    He invented the Internet, and without that, where would we all be?

    (More seriously, Yukihiro Matzumoto, _why_the_lucky_stiff_, and other Rubyists.)

  114. Szymon Stefanek and Rob Flynn by tannhaus · · Score: 1

    Szymon Stefanek started Kvirc ( http://www.kvirc.net ) back when people thought that to use irc on linux meant you had to use bitchx. Mainly due to nothing but his own hard work he created an exceptional irc client that, in my opinion, was as good as anything on windows. Then, with help from people joining the project, they made it better than anything on windows.

    Rob Flynn maintains the gaim project ( http://gaim.sourceforge.net ) and took over for Mark Spencer (the original author...who also deserves an award). Thanks to their hard work we have an instant messaging client better than anything else on linux or windows.

    It's one thing to say linux is ready for the desktop, but how about we show some appreciation for those that made it not only ready for the desktop, but are responsible for those applications that make it superior to windows for many of our online activities.

    Personally, my hats go off to these gents. They saw where linux was lacking and took the initiative to fill those gaps.

  115. Reggie for Connector/net by OldCrasher · · Score: 1

    Reggie, now over at MySQL, for the development of the ADO.NET connector. Fine piece of work.

    I needed to access MySQL in a C# and .NET environment and he had the solution I liked best.

    Well done dude.

  116. Rasterman and Tigert by suso · · Score: 1

    Not really unsung, because they had their day, but they were a driving force in changing the idea of a desktop and making professional looking artwork and icons.

  117. Darl McBride by Laebshade · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because, after all, some of the code SCO wrote is in Linux. Now Darl, don't be modest, show us what you've contributed!

  118. Darl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    for bringing the Weakest... Case... Ever... against the GPL; and increasing Linux awareness for all Business Executives where it was needed the most.

  119. Thanks to the unsung heros by KB1GHC · · Score: 1

    I seem to agree that Open Source Developers are unsung heros. ex: many many people contribute to mozilla whatever they can. But yet their names arn't anywhere to be found. (i'm prolly not looking hard enough, but it should be in the "about" window)

    To: all Open Source Developers
    THANKS! WE APPRECIATE IT!

    1. Re:Thanks to the unsung heros by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      Try "about:credits".

      Yaz.

  120. A more serious entry by dacarr · · Score: 1
    I have to admit that one of the real "hero" labels should go to the people who make the easier-to-use distros. Mandrake and Redhat.

    No, really.

    To be perfectly honest, it's Mandrake alone that have worked quite well when I found it to defenestrate a few users. As vilified as they seem to be these days, they make it much easier for the Linux newbie to get involved and get away from Windows. And as crufty as RPM is, gotta hand Red Hat that one; even if apt is better.

    Besides, if it weren't for Mandrake, I'd still be using OS/2 Warp 4. =O.o=

    --
    This sig no verb.
  121. No one has mentioned... by KillaKen187 · · Score: 2, Funny

    SCO yes SCO for making a complete idiot of themselves and suing IBM for a product (Linux) that they don't even own. Also for other such hilarious comments as Linux doesn't exsist, Linux is just Unix, and we no longer offer Linux to our customers

    1. Re:No one has mentioned... by shish · · Score: 1

      I clicked the link, and the first thing I saw was that SCO do skunkware; WTF?

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  122. Eben Moglen - the real force behind the GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's the guy who made the GPL as solid as it is; and help Linux gain momentum that BSD never could achieve.

  123. Paul Ramsey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of Refractions Research for PostGIS and bringing geospatial processing out of the domain of the $X0000 'oracle spatial' and 'ESRI SDE' crowd.

  124. Unsung by Ziest · · Score: 1
    I vote for Jordan Hubbard who lead the FreeBSD project for many years.

    --
    Another day closer to redwood heaven
  125. Me by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0

    I am my favorite unknown Open Source Developer. My project, the "Lars O Matic" never really caught on or even got me a "Nice idea" email.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  126. Aww by 955301 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sometimes, as an Open Source Software developer, I wonder if anyone out there is actually noticing the contributions I make to the software they're running.

    Does somebody need a hug???? Come'er! We'll give you one, but it'll be sloppy, overwhelming, we'll argue the whole time we're giving it, and then we'll vanish.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  127. Patrick Volkerding by defMan · · Score: 1

    I'd like to name Patrick Volkerding who created Slackware. Slackware is a brilliant (and oldest still going) linux distribution.

    Currently i'm using slackware 10.

    1. Re:Patrick Volkerding by Derf_X · · Score: 1
      I second that!

      It is the only distribution that I use for anything, from 486s to the latest 32 bit Athlons, for servers, routers and desktops.

    2. Re:Patrick Volkerding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Third that!

    3. Re:Patrick Volkerding by User0x45 · · Score: 0

      Forth.

      I have always wondered why there is a 'red hat' logo here on /., a GNU symbol, Mandrake, but no Slackware symbol. A travesty for this, the oldest continuous distro.

      This is the first of the new, get a Slack symbol campaign.

      --Chris

  128. w00t to Davide Libenzi by chaffed · · Score: 1

    Davide Libenzi of Xmail Server and Many other great projects is my hero of OSS.

    To bad I didn't see this posting sooner.

    --
    What could possibly go wrong?
  129. Paul Vixie by winkydink · · Score: 2, Informative

    notable for work on bind and cron among other things

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Paul Vixie by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Vixie is a pretty well-known name. Just about everyone uses some ISC software, whether they know it or not.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  130. He's friendly to newbie strangers, too by roystgnr · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think that was one of my first "wow" moments with open source: in '97 or '98 I discovered that not only could I recompile my ethernet driver, but when I had a problem with it (Linksys had put out a new card with the same model number but a different chipset) I could email the author and he'd send me a patch.

    1. Re:He's friendly to newbie strangers, too by Kz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was exactly my case too!

      i don't remember what i asked him, but his answer was quick and to the point. it was certainly a 'wow' moment, and it encouraged me to read and try to understand most of the kernel (that wasn't so difficult those days of Linux 0.99pl9). I even wrote a device driver, an early version of nbd, but when i tried to submit it, linux 1.1 was underway... and before i could read it again, 2.0 was just on the horizon...

      anyway, his attitude was what totally made me an open source beleiver.

      --
      -Kz-
  131. Who else? by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 1

    ESR, for being a pretentious fop.

    --
    You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
  132. Knoppix Modding Community by drfreak · · Score: 1

    I'd like to thank the whole Knoppix modding community. The way they add new features to Knoppix and then share them with each other is amazing. I often see the same features merged in newer versions of Knoppix as well. Proof positive that a project fork can be healthy for open source.

  133. whoever first put porn on the internet by maxpublic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Without that guy, and all the porn-meisters who followed him to cash in on geek sexual frustration, the internet would still be nothing more than a curiosity.

    Thank god for porn!

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    1. Re:whoever first put porn on the internet by iacovou · · Score: 1

      does the creator of alt.sex.pictures get us close?

      --
      //iacovou
  134. John W. Eaton by flossie · · Score: 3, Informative

    John W. Eaton, developer of GNU Octave. John has been developing the project for over a decade and has produced a serious rival to Matlab for numerical computation. All scientists and engineers should be aware of Octave.

  135. lame by orpx · · Score: 1

    your missing something, and that's that heros don't do it for the glory. They do it because they enjoy doing what is right. So.. I think what your talking about is being a Zero.

    I am always mad, does that make me insane?

  136. Roberto De Leo by tyrotyro · · Score: 1

    Roberto De Leo is the creater/maintainer of The Movix Project, one of the most useful live Linux Distros I have ever used.

    With Movix, I can boot up to a linux environment that plays all forms of multimedia. It uses mplayer. It came in really handy my Linux drive died. I was still able to play all the media on my /home partition without issue.

    --
    Here's a guy who enjoys his job: The UPS Man
  137. ME! (and a friend) - Steering IBM's Ship of State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several years ago (won't say how many) someone at IBM (won't say who) fired a note to an executive (again, won't say who) to the effect of, "When are we going to get off the stick and start porting xxx (won't say what) to Linux?" The exec told two staff guys (etc) to, "Find out what this Linux stuff is all about."

    A friend of mine (etc) had his name associated with Linux in a readily internally searchable way, so they called him, and he called me. Over several sessions for the next month or so, by email and telephone, we educated the staff guys on Linux. One guy was truly Sold on Linux, and went on to run his own news mailing for about a year or so.

    The presentation was made to the exec - I have a copy, and a thank-you note. Sometime after this, IBM began steering its way onto the Linux course. Incidentally, the unnamed program WAS (and still is) ported to Linux.

    So for one brief, shining moment, I actually had my hand on the rudder steering IBM. (Agreed not the biggest hand on the rudder, but it was still there and it moved the direction I was pushing.)

  138. Theo DeRaadt.... by Mhrmnhrm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    for being an absolute ass when it comes to maintaining license simplicity, source purity, security paranoia, and funny looking pufferfish.

    --
    I suspect that one of these choices is incorrect. Correct.
    1. Re:Theo DeRaadt.... by globalar · · Score: 2, Informative

      For anyone who doesn't know, Theo de Raadt founded OpenBSD and OpenSSH. He was interviewed once on /. and has a Wikipedia page.

  139. I didn't know he had a last name.... by dayhox · · Score: 1

    http://store1.yimg.com/I/ftcollect_1810_47755248

  140. Shouldn't we mention John McCarthy?... by Zx-man · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...(What (would (you (do))) (without) (such (a (remarkable language))) as LISP?)

  141. Henry Spencer by doom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hereby suggest for your consideration Henry Spencer, only in part for the open source code that he's written -- he was the author of a popular regular expression library, for example. The really massive contribution that Henry Spencer has made, in my opinion is *informed commentary*. He's spent decades hanging around in the C programming newsgroups (not to mention the sci.space.* tree) answering questions intelligently. This is the kind of contribution that I think gets ignored far too often... yes great coders deserve to be honored, but people willing to educate and to do it for free on a volunteer basis, and *do a good job of it* are if anything even rarer.

    1. Re:Henry Spencer by 44BSD · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seconded.

      While we're at it in the newsfroups department, let's add Vernon Shryver, Paul Vixie, Tony Li,
      Dan Bernstein, and of course, Kibo.

      For code and cluefulness, Wietse Venema.

    2. Re:Henry Spencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along these lines I would recommend $Bill Luebkert

      He has supported Perl by helping users of all levels
      with excellent advice and code examples.

      (he's never flamed me, even when I had to be told to escape the @ in the email address! ;0)

    3. Re:Henry Spencer by mat.h · · Score: 1
      Henry is a sung hero: In Vernor Vinge's "A fire upon the deep", there is a poster to the "net of a million lies" (basically a galaxy-wide Usenet with surprisingly little spam) called "Sandor Arbitration Intelligence at the Zoo".

      At the time, Henry's address was @zoo.toronto.edu. When you look though the rec.arts.sf.* archives, there seems to be general consensus that Henry is Sandor at the Zoo.

  142. Tim Berners-Lee by an_mo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am somewhat amazed by how unknown he is to the general public, at least compared to Linus.

    1. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by pjdepasq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is so true. I had the pleasure of hearing him speak in 1996 and he was amazing. I'm currently attempting to complete a project that was on his 'wish list' back then and I'm still surprised no one has (apparently) attempted it.

      When I ask my students if they know who he is, 99% of the time it draws a blank stare. This happens with other techies of an older age as well. It's really a shame. He is the father of a great change in computing and a new business paradigm when you think about it.

      Then again, he did get knighted....

      (In case no one says it, and he reads this.... Thank you TIM!)

    2. Re:Tim Berners-Lee by an_mo · · Score: 1

      Can you say what project on his wish list you are trying to implement?

  143. Gerard Beekmans by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 3, Informative

    Gerard Beekmans is the guy who started the Linux From Scratch project. It's not one of the most popular distro's, but I'm pretty sure it's an important project in terms of inspiration, useful info, and generally helping Linux conquer the world.

  144. Embedded Guru by GoRK · · Score: 4, Informative

    How about Erik Andersen, the force behind BusyBox and uClibc? This guy has (nearly) singlehandedly reimplemented linux userland in an insanely efficient manner. There's probably not a single embedded developer/user that doesn't owe him at least a 'thanks, man!'

  145. the team behind Rockbox by elinenbe · · Score: 1

    check it out www.rockbox.haxx -- an open source project for something that is not PC related or uses linux. A huge props to those guys.

    --
    -eric
  146. subversion? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    Never heard of Subversion before this. Was planning to deploy CVS in the near future. Is there a summary of Subversion somewhere, explaining why I should use it rather than CVS?

    1. Re:subversion? by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      There's subversion vs CVS; I haven't used Subversion so I'm not sure. But it seems like that's the wave of the future...

    2. Re:subversion? by eison · · Score: 1

      CVS has a bad habit of getting wedged and needing an admin, which is a poor habit for a revision control tool.

      No clue if subversion does or not; I quite using CVS in favor of Perforce, which utterly and completely absolutely rocks, but isn't open source. :(

      --
      is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
    3. Re:subversion? by godIsaDJ · · Score: 1
      Fancy this... I hate Perforce, its weird conflict resolution algorithm (too often high on lsd) its horrible interface and the fact that you never know what the hell yours and theirs is supposed to mean!

      CVS never screwed on of my integrations! Then again we should be talking ClearCase...

  147. The whole GNU team by zoeblade · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this why RMS insists on calling it GNU/Linux: so that the many people who contributed to the GNU part are in some way appreciated, rather than everyone looking solely to Linus "Linux" Torvalds?

    It won't work, though. Every successful band, pretty much, has one person fronting it, and it's the same principle. People find it easier to focus their gratitude on just one person.

    1. Re:The whole GNU team by Bas_Wijnen · · Score: 1

      No, the GNU/Linux argument is not about recognition. He'd like that, too, but as he says here:

      if there were nothing at stake except credit, perhaps it would be wiser to let the matter drop. But we are not in that position. To inspire people to do the work that needs to be done, we need to be recognized for what we have already done.

      GNU is about freedom. Linus doesn't seem to care much about that. The fsf wants people to know about their goals, therefore they want to have their name on their work. Not for the credit, but to let people know about what they want.

      So they wouldn't really have a problem if RMS would get all the credit, as long as the message would reach the people.

    2. Re:The whole GNU team by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Given that RMS is Alpha Geek of the Wingnuts I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have a problem with RMS getting all the credit. I'm sure he'd say that he doesn't care, although I wouldn't believe it. Nonetheless it's still pretty silly. If people want GNU software they'll find out about it and they'll learn that it's what they want. Clearly, they don't give a fuck, they just want software that works.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:The whole GNU team by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Isn't this why RMS insists on calling it GNU/Linux
      Here we go again. The gnu operating system is called the HURD. Linus is not part of the gnu team and did not write linux under the direction of the gnu team.

      The suggestion to rename the thing to LiGnuX (linux-gnu-X) by RMS was seen as silly and none of his affair. A later effort to rename the thing gnu/linux caught on to a point - but the reality is you don't get to name other peoples projects.

      There is a very simple way to name it gnu/linux - all gnu has to do is put out a distribution of linux, and then they get to name it. So as well as Redhat linux we would have gnu linux. Getting credit for the projects of others may be par for the course in MIT internal politics, but why should we put up with it?

      Every successful band, pretty much, has one person fronting it
      But in this case it wasn't the guy who wrote the text editor macros that someone else turned into a program.
    4. Re:The whole GNU team by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Here we go again, more RMS-bashing.

      RMS does not want to rename Linux anything at all. Linux is Linux, plain and simple. The problem is, most people think Linux is something it isn't. This is the whole kernel/OS issue. I presume you must know this, given that you read Slashdot, and are simply being deliberately misleading to further your own anti-RMS agenda. But just in case, on the off chance you really don't understand, this is the deal:

      Unlike (for example) the Free BSDs, Linux-based Operating Systems are not developed as one centrally managed, coherent project. Rather, they are sort of thrown together from a patchwork quilt of projects written by many, many different people. The kernel, which exists primarily to provide basic low-level services to programs (and by low-level I mean, really, really low level -- I don't mean a command line), is only one part of the whole package. While the remaining required parts were written by a wide spectrum of hackers from all walks of OSS life, a stunningly large number of them wrote for the GNU project.

      The kernel is an essential part, yes. But not the only essential part. For example, unless you like inlining int 0x80 calls into your C programs, you probably use a C library to interface with your kernel. Guess who wrote that? If it didn't exist, nothing would run. If you don't write your programs in C, your program's standard library in all likelyhood talks to glibc. You know what that g stands for, right?

      In fact, without other programs, the kernel wouldn't even boot. Because Linux based OSs depend on "many processes doing small tasks and doing them well". The Linux kernel by itself depends on /sbin/init, for example.

      Furthermore (and this is incidental, but worth noting), the Linux kernel is developed against GCC and the GNU binutils chain. Indeed, it doesn't compile properly with any other compiler (even those expressly designed to be drop in replacements for gcc, like Intel's icc or the Pentium optimized pgcc).

      In fact, the GNU tools are so ubiquitous that even the BSDs can't manage to do everything on their own, though they would dearly love to. They depend on GCC/binutils if they want to ship a free, development ready system!

      Your comment about 'text editor macros that someone else turned into a program' is misleading as well. While it is true that GNU emacs was not the first emacs, GNU emacs is an RMS creation. Like all good OSS projects, it isn't predominently written by its creator anymore -- but then that's true of the Linux kernel also, and so using this as a smear is sort of a non-starter.

      RMS is an amazing programmer. So is Linus. Frankly, anyone that says otherwise is insulting OSS in general; these two men are giants. If you want to talk about poor coders becoming OSS leaders, pick on ESR, not RMS. RMS is the real deal.

      Anyway, getting over the ad homniem, and back to the GNU/Linux vs Linux issue, the distinction is useful, because the kernel and userland are the userland+kernel are three different beasts that just happen to be related. I can understand people who know nothing about tech being confused about this; I can even understand people that understand the distinction prefering to say simply Linux... but what I absolutely cannot abide is some Slashbot who has, in all likelyhood, never contributed anything of worth to the OSS movement slandering RMS, of all people, based on a misunderstanding of the situation.

      The GNU/Linux debacle exists because of the following facts: a) There is, on average, more GNU code than Linux kernel code in even the most stripped down distributions, and (unlike with X or other popular components of a GNU/Linux system that people often bring up) much of it is not optional. b) Technical people like to be precise, and saying "Linux" when you mean the whole OS is decidedly not precise, especially if you hack both user and kernelspace.

      If you cannot grok that, I don't know what to say.

      I personlly don't care which term you use, or your personal feelings for RMS, but if you're going to criticize, criticize without just pulling stuff out of your rear orifice.

    5. Re:The whole GNU team by dbIII · · Score: 1
      RMS does not want to rename Linux anything at all
      But he tried to do it just the same? Seriously, If he really didn't want to do it he wouldn't had the two attempts to rename it and have spent all of those years "correcting" people.
      In fact, without other programs, the kernel wouldn't even boot
      Not really relevant in the name of a project - standing on the shoulders of giants etc.
      The Linux kernel by itself depends on /sbin/init, for example
      The linux version of which, strangely enough, was written by Linus and not anyone from the gnu team.
      GNU emacs is an RMS creation
      Perhaps, just not written by him. He has never been the emacs developer, even after he sacked the emacs developer and forked emacs it took a year for the new RMS appointed successor to know enough of the code to start to work on it. RMS did not contribute any code to emacs at all in that year. He did not write emacs, and he did not continue developing emacs - but it has been declared as one of his great acheivements. He's got plenty of real acheivements - but putting his groups name on other things like linux which they didn't develop is considerd bad form by many.
      RMS is an amazing programmer
      But he still doesn't get to name other people projects.
      Frankly, anyone that says otherwise is insulting OSS in general
      Incorrect - we don't need heros, we need ideas that we can share that are not shown to us before we are told we cannot use them.
      kernel and userland are the userland+kernel are three different beasts
      There is a lot in every distribution that has never been touched by the gnu team, so I don't think that is relevant either. RMS appears to have realised that when he came up with the LiGnuX name some years back.
      slandering RMS ... based on a misunderstanding of the situation
      It's in the public record, he's said it in interviews with the press, he's not ashamed of it - he thought it would be a good way to boost the profile of gnu and thought he could justify it.

      He's a human being - the perfect hero treatment is for dead people or for those you can't question without an iron fist of authority crushing you. We can talk about the bad stuff as well as the good stuff, and we don't have to balance any negative comment with "he wrote the GPL but ...".

      Look up LiGnuX, lucid emacs, his attitudes to passwords, the whole man page vs info thing and you'll find, like most human beings, you need to follow his positive examples and not everything he does.

      Technical people like to be precise, and saying "Linux" when you mean the whole OS
      In which case you name the distribution, or at least everyone around here does.
      never contributed anything of worth
      You don't know me, I don't know you, so this form of argument will always be considered worthless. A huge amount has been derived here from a short comment.
    6. Re:The whole GNU team by zoeblade · · Score: 1

      RMS does not want to rename Linux anything at all

      But he tried to do it just the same? Seriously, If he really didn't want to do it he wouldn't had the two attempts to rename it and have spent all of those years "correcting" people.

      RMS never tried to rename Linux. Linux is a kernal. GNU is a bunch of little programmes that will be a complete OS once the Herd kernal is finished. GNU/Linux is what RMS is trying to get people to call an operating system that comprises the Linux kernal and a lot of GNU programmes that Linux won't work without.

    7. Re:The whole GNU team by Bas_Wijnen · · Score: 1
      If people want GNU software they'll find out about it and they'll learn that it's what they want.

      No, they won't. Just like you can't expect people to come up with Newton's laws by themselves, you shouldn't expect people to make deep philosophical arguments either. However, when you tell people about either of them, they can think about it and agree or disagree. If people don't know GNU exists, because all they know is that their "Linux operating system" is working fine, and they aren't told about GNU, then don't expect them to think of this by themselves.

      Clearly, they don't give a fuck, they just want software that works.

      Because that's the only thing they think of. Before I was told about free software, I sold my software closed source. Now that I have read articles on GNU's website, I wouldn't want to do that again, because they convinced me that distributing the source is better for everyone (including me, except maybe on the short term, but I try not to make desicions based on that whenever possible.)

      As you say, RMS probably wants recognition. I don't mind if he does. If he gets more than he deserves, I don't really mind either. I do care if many people get to know the GNU project, because that may make the world better.

    8. Re:The whole GNU team by dbIII · · Score: 1
      lot of GNU programmes that Linux won't work without
      Not really relevant - the electricity company doesn't get to name it either.

      You get to name your own project - not someone elses, that is the only issue here.

    9. Re:The whole GNU team by 808140 · · Score: 1

      This is really late, but I think you really must be daft. RMS doesn't want to rename the Linux project. He wants Linux based OSs to be called GNU/Linux. It shouldn't be such a subtle distinction for someone as apparently technically competent as you.

      Linus's project is Linux, the kernel. The kernel is and always will be called Linux, plain and simple -- even RMS calls it Linux.

      Linus's project is not Linux + glibc + gcc + binutils + bash + whatever GNU tools are required to produce a system that actually boots into something you can do productive work with. Linus' project is just Linux.

      To the non-techinical user, for example, UNIX systems seem to be a command line, because a non-technical user associates the interface to the system with the system itself. So a non-technical user, upon being told that the command line is called bash, might start calling the whole system bash, if left to his own devices. But this would clearly be completely wrong, because bash by itself does nothing at all. Clearly you can understand this.

      You keep saying RMS wants to rename Linus' project, heck you've repeated this same claim at least 3 times in this thread. This is blatantly and completely wrong. Since you don't seem to be the special ed type I can only assume you are deliberately overlooking this fact. RMS wants to rename the whole OS, of which only a small part can be credited to Linus and yet which is popularly refered to as simply 'Linux'. He doesn't like the fact that his project developed a whole OS from scratch, minus the kernel, taking 20 years to do so, incorporating the work of lots and lots of selflessly motivated hackers, and that one admittedly very brilliant coder comes along, writes the kernel, drops it into the mix as the last piece of a puzzle, and gets the credit not for writing the kernel, but for writing the whole OS.

      Notice that he wants it called GNU/Linux, not RMS/Linux. RMS may be synonymous with GNU but as you pointed out, lots of people have contributed to the GNU project and they all deserve a certain amount of credit.

      To recap, RMS himself refers to Linux (Linus' project, the kernel) as Linux. GNU/Linux is Linux + GNU, all the GNU utilities, that make it work. So far, outside of the embedded sphere, there are no distributions that are not packaging GNU with Linux to produce their OS. You could probably hack together BSD/Linux or something, and in that case, calling it GNU/Linux would be foolhardy -- but wouldn't you say that it would be rather weird to call the Linux kernel running with the BSD userland simply Linux? I mean, wouldn't that be a rather different system? Even with a Linux kernel, it would still feel like BSD.

      Do you see what I'm getting at? I am not telling you to call the OS GNU/Linux. You can call it whatever you want. But stop saying, for gods sake, that RMS is trying to rename Linus' project, because he isn't. He wants people to understand that the kernel is only a small part of the whole package. The average media drone? I don't expect him to get it. You? You ought to.

      As for Emacs, I'm not even going to get into it, because what you're saying is totally false. It seems like you're confused rather than malicious, though. For a more detailed understanding of the situation leading up to the Lucid fork (in which both parties behaved rather badly), go read the info jwz posted on his site.

    10. Re:The whole GNU team by dbIII · · Score: 1
      RMS doesn't want to rename the Linux project. He wants Linux based OSs to be called GNU/Linux
      That isn't then gnu project - it's OS project is the hurd.
      You keep saying RMS wants to rename Linus' project
      He's on record saying it a large number of times.
      Notice that he wants it called GNU/Linux, not RMS/Linux
      He gave a reason that it would raise the profile of the gnu project - this is on record many times as well.
      there are no distributions that are not packaging GNU with Linux to produce their OS
      They are also packaging a lot of other things that are not part of the gnu project.

      Gnu has never put together a linux distribution - there is no gnu/linux. Other people have taken bits that gnu developed for the hurd and used it with linux. Those people have then given their distributions names. There is a Debian Gnu/Linux, but that is entirely the choice of the people in charge of the distribution. The gnu people, working on their own separate project do not automaticly get naming rights just because gcc is bundled with a linux distribution.

      All this LiGnuX stuff was thrashed out many years ago and was agreed by many to be silly, because the word linux had already become used commonly to describe both the distribution and the kernel.

      Back to the initial topic - unsung heroes. The GNU people sing loudly about themselves, and so they should, and RMS is certainly not shy of self promotion (probably a vital survival skill in his job) and as I said, being opportunistic in promoting the cause of the GNU project. Many people would think it is entirely justified - I'm certain the GNU peoiple think it is. I just don't think they should have insisted on getting naming rights for the distributions.

    11. Re:The whole GNU team by 808140 · · Score: 1

      This is the last time I'm going to post, because I'm tiring of this thread (and I'll bet you are too) and in all likelyhood we'll never see eye to eye on this. I agree that LiGnuX is stupid. So does RMS, which is the main reason it was dropped.

      The HURD is not the name of GNU's OS project. The HURD is the name of the kernel of the GNU System. GNU itself is an OS project. It was created to build a Free UNIX-like OS. It isn't a place like sourceforge that just has a bunch of free projects having nothing to do with each other hosted on it. They had a goal -- to produce the GNU system. HURD is just one part of that. Linux has since then replaced the HURD as the kernel of the GNU system, although RMS and others still believe that the HURD's microkernel design is more elegant than Linux's monolithic one, and hope it will eventually mature. In the meantime, they specify that they are running a Linux-based GNU system. GNU/Linux. The idea for the GNU system goes back to 1984, when the project was founded.

      To reiterate, you may not care, and may go ahead and call your whole system Linux if it pleases you, but no one is trying to rename Linux (the kernel). GNU people call their system the GNU system; now, because people mostly run Linux as the kernel of the GNU system, we say GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd (and even GNU/NetBSD) to differentiate. It really isn't complex. I don't care what you call your system. But at least try to understand that no one is trying to steal Linux's baby or take credit away from him.

    12. Re:The whole GNU team by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Linux has since then replaced the HURD as the kernel of the GNU system
      incorrect
  148. I third that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even when I have to admit that I didn't even know who the author of vim is. I use vim everyday for some pretty big OSS development :)

    tels

  149. Shaun Walker and Jim Duffy by tetranz · · Score: 1

    For DotNetNuke.

    IMHO, the best open source content management system.

  150. Texstar for PCLinuxOS 2K4 by thedarb · · Score: 1

    I'd like to recognize Texstar for creating the PCLinuxOS distribution. It's a great Live-CD that also serves as a great installed distro with a complete online software repository... and who does the huge portion of work on getting this distro built and out? Texstar himself. I won't plug the hosting website, as I help maintain the site. Suffice it to say you could google for PCLinuxOS and find it if you are interested.

    *TheDarb

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  151. Rasmus Lerdorf by Garridan · · Score: 1

    He invented PHP. I learned PHP in 2 weeks, and haven't been unemployed since. Rasmus is the MAN.

  152. List only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I wouldn't know where to begin. OpenSource software is what allowed me to build my business and thus work from home instead of a corporate office, be home when my kids get home from school everyday, take vacations when I want, and basically de-stress my entire life and probably saved me from a stress related heart attack in 20 years. ...And that wasn't one program, it was everything from the big ones like Apache and Linux down through to the rinky dink little industry specific one-up tools I've used here and there to make life easier. So - a bit OT, but a good time to thank *everyone* who's pumping out OS software, including those that do the tiny unseen stuff. You don't know me, I don't know you and we'll never meet. But the total OS effect that you're a part of has drastically and directly improved my life. And I'm not alone by any stretch. (By contrast, MS hasn't done anything for me though I'm hoping for a check in the mail).

  153. Cowboy Neal by danZenie · · Score: 1

    some dude named Cowboy Neal. i see his name on /. polls all the time. i assume he's some kind of open source freak/hero.

    --
    You need people like me so you can point your fuckin fingers and say, "That's the bad guy." So what that make you? Good?
  154. Jean-Loup Gaily... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Author of
    "A Massively Spiffy Yet Delicately Unobtrusive Compression Library (Also Free, Not to Mention Unencumbered by Patents)" ... a k a Zlib

  155. Van Pelt by tepples · · Score: 1

    You're thinking of Linus Van Pelt from Peanuts.

  156. off the top of my head... by Siva · · Score: 4, Insightful
    --

    Keyboard not found.
    Press F1 to continue.
  157. PORN STARS! by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    Without them, the coders might have to go and find relationships that last more than 15 minutes, and the code output would suffer.

  158. The Brazilian Government's Sérgio Amadeu by agoliveira · · Score: 1

    This guy is great! He's the main responsible for our new federal free software policy. He's really fighting hard for it and even Microsoft once tried to sue him about one interview when he said that they use a drug dealer method of business "the first one is free..."

    --
    Scientia est Potentia
  159. Tomas Junnonen by Tbeehler · · Score: 1

    For making Firestarter. I personally cannot tell you how much time and energy that little program helped me out. Especially since I was a Linux newbie at the time.

  160. Re:Bram Moolenaar - OT cppcomplete by baboon · · Score: 1

    I posted a quaestion to the vim.org list and nobody answered: How do you get cppcomplete to work? It sounds like exactly what I want and I've never gotten a "match", even if I built the tags myself.

    Also, I buckled and activated the menu bar just for tagmenu.vim. It just seems more convenient for me than taglist.vim (which I still have ready for console use). I just wish tagmenu.vim didn't have two levels of menus to get the functions (vs. just dump them on the first level like VisualAssist).

  161. Michael Sweet by juan2074 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... for both CUPS and HTMLDOC.

  162. Gerd Knorr. . . by dresgarcia · · Score: 2, Informative

    He is writing/upkeeping the BTTV driver for linux that makes me able to use TVtime and (try) to use freevo on my linux box. He also has helped play a role in the success of the company I work for as his BTTV driver has helped fix a lot of issues with out TV/FM tuner cards.
    Thanks Gerd! (http://linux.bytesex.org/v4l2/bttv.html) for anyone interested in the driver

  163. NetBSD on Mac/68k by UNIBLAB_PowerPC · · Score: 1

    How about the folks who made it possible for cheap bastards like me to install NetBSD on ancient hardware (in my case, Mac 68k -- you know, the pre-Power-Mac stuff)? And to keep maintaining code for an obsolete architecture? For that, I owe some serious snaps and props to the NetBSD/Mac68k gang -- Alan Briggs, Bruce O'Neel, Hauke Fath, Frederick Bruckman, John Klos, Michael Zucca, Riccardo Mottola, Shigeki Uno, Julio Vidal, Tim Larson, and anyone who I might have missed. I owe those guys some serious beers!

    1. Re:NetBSD on Mac/68k by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Some of those are probably more recent than when I stopped following the lists, but I can't believe I forgot Michael Zucca and Hauke Fath in my list (page 1). Yeah, hear, hear.

      You forgot Nigel "Booter" Pearson, John "Cuda" Wittkoski, Colin "Mac ROM Glue" Wood, and Scott "Damn, Allen's shoes are big" Reynolds (the current port maintainer, in case anybody doesn't get the joke).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  164. John Carmack by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Another Linux gaming hero (though not as unsung as Lantinga, even if his Linux accomplishments are less well known) is John Carmack. Carmack:

    * Promoted use of OpenGL over DirectX, stopping an important Microsoft lock-in tool.

    * Created a series of (good) cross-platform games to encourage vendors to support Linux with 3d hardware -- probably at loss to his company.

    * Wrote code for 3d drivers in the GLX era (pre-DRI) to help bootstrap the 3d world on Linux.

    * Created a series of cross-platform engines that could be used to make cross-platform games.

    * Open-sourced his older cross-platform game code to encourage production of games based on this code.

  165. Re:Steve Jobs is god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bow and grovel before Steve !!!
    beg for mercy!

  166. Fedora-list gurus by matt_morgan · · Score: 1

    For those who haven't tried it, the fedora-list (http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-lis t) is a fantastic list, full of incredibly helpful, incredibly knowledgeable people. Alexander Dalloz stands out, but the whole list is fantastic. I learn something new every time I sit down to catch up with the messages.

  167. Francis Irving of TortoiseCVS... by unDees · · Score: 1
    ...for making CVS not only bearable on Windows, but actually enjoyable.

    Disclosure: I had the pleasure of contributing a few modest lines of code to Tortoise, but believe me, it was way cool long before my meager changes made their way in.

    --
    "I call a baby goat a 'goatse.'" -- my non-Internet-savvy 6-year-old stepdaughter
  168. Pamela Jones and Gonzalo Porcel by LibrePensador · · Score: 1

    I would have to say Pamela Jones of Groklaw who has done a lot to uphold the values and spirit of free software through valuable legal research.

    Closer to home, Gonzalo Porcel, one of the founders of the Miami Linux Users Group has done more to spread the use of Free Softaware locally than anybody I know. Not only does he help with technical issues in our monthly meetings and through the forum, he has led a number of very successful projects to set up community computer labs running Linux.

    --
    Pragmatism as an ideology is not particularly pragmatic in the long term. Keep it in mind when you dismiss Free Software
  169. USENET heros by Hackysacker · · Score: 1

    The unsung heros of comp.text.tex include donald arsenau, david kastrup, and that English guy with the BBC fetish. They have been answering my questions for 10 years.

  170. PHP People by TheTomcat · · Score: 1

    Here: CVSROOT/avail

    S

    1. Re:PHP People by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      Woot! I got a mention (if indirectly :P).

      pear, peardoc, and phpdoc

  171. and remixed.. by eshefer · · Score: 1
  172. Hartmut Pilch by infolib · · Score: 1

    Tirelessly guiding, driving and pulling the european anti-software patent movement.

    Without Hartmut Pilch the EU would have legalized software patents by now. Just think what that would do to Free Software...

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  173. Donald Becker by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Now that you mention JPL/NASA -- Donald Becker.

    Donald Becker started working on clustering Linux machines. He was one of the original founders of Beowulf, without which Slashdot would lose a lot of its culture. He is also responsible for a huge number of the Linux Ethernet drivers. A major reason that Linux is such a solid server OS is because of his work.

  174. Re:Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you're the guy that keeps stalking him. Thanks for not posting anonymously.

    Weirdo.

  175. You'd be surprised by bruns · · Score: 1

    You'd be surprised at the amount of people who are involved with development, but you never hear about, or have their names in the documentation.

    The SOSDG doesn't have any full coding projects of its own, however we do our own ports of applications to Windows, and provide hosting, programmers, and management support to dozens of projects.

    Sometimes, its the little things that matter - the beta testing, the packaging, etc. I personally, while not a programmer anymore, do project management and beta testing on things. I find bugs, make sure that people have the server power they need for development, stuff like that.

    Even the smallest thing in Open Source development can be rewarding.

    --
    Brielle
  176. Xavier Leroy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xavier Leroy for the OCAML system and the Linux's Posix Threads.

    Suerte :).

  177. check out GVI by RussP · · Score: 1

    I certainly don't claim to be an unsung hero, but I am a bit disappointed at how little attention my GVI (Graphical Voter Interface) has received. Check it out. I think you will like it.

    --
    I watch Brit Hume on Fox News
  178. Arthur David Olson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ado has been the maintainer of the time zone data base ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/ for years, almost certainly largely a thankless task. How else would we know what time it is? He also contributed to grep. He is also a genuinely good and modest person.

  179. Teh Balladae of ye Unnamed Developer by gomel · · Score: 1

    The Slashdoeters built a worship thread then,
    in ten days, high and broad
    on the Apache server, a beacon
    for ye search bots
    widely seen by web surfers.

    They surrounded the server
    by a fire wall, as splendid
    as the cleverest
    hax0r could make.

    In ye pr0n/ directory they placed
    PNGs and JPEGs
    and all such things as
    they'd found on their HDDs.

    They left that precious traesure
    in a forbidden-access directory,
    as it lies still,
    as useless to men
    as it had been before.

    Then twelve Moderators
    rode round the thread
    moding up those
    posting praises
    for their Hero's
    hackish deeds.
    (A geek should do so
    when his Dude gets fragged.)

    Thus ye Slashdoeters
    mourned their great Developer,
    saying he was,
    among this world's Coders,
    ye hax0rest, ye nerdest,
    ye dudest to his people,
    and the most eager
    for eternal MOD-PARENT-UP's.

    -- Gall Anonimus

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
  180. Isaac & team of MythTV fame by mgrassi99 · · Score: 1

    Of course his package builds on Linux and quite an extensive list of libraries, but the MythTV package is capable of many incredible features that rivals Tivo and other commerical PVR's, and at least on my setup, is rock-solid. Good job! -Mike

  181. Brian Fox, author of the Bash shell by hqm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Without the bash shell, Linus wouldn't have had anything to boot up to :-)

    Brian Fox was the original author.

  182. I nominate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I nominate M.J. Ray, recently defunct Debian-legal member, who zealously protected Debian from evil licenses. May he rest in peace.

  183. Frank Warmerdam! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is a hero of the Open Source GIS software.

    He maintains the Tiff and GeoTiff libraries, Proj, OpenEV, and probably more ;)

    He is also the main author of the amazing GDAL/OGR suite.

    Great stuff and great support.

    Thanks!

  184. david miller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    formerly of rutgers university. he ported linux to sparc way back in 1996 and helped me get it running on my old sparcstation LX. i think he was working on SGI ports back then too!

  185. MJ Ray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MJ Ray is one unsung hero from Debian. Tragically, he is no longer among the living.

  186. Tooting my own horn, thank you very much by rongage · · Score: 1

    Since I strongly doubt there are many people in here who are using any of the software packages I have wrote, I am going to toot my own horn here. Don't like it - sorry about that!

    Granted, I am what you would call a niche developer. The software packages that I have wrote mostly deal with communicating with Allen Bradley Programmable Logic Controllers like the ControlLogix and the PLC-5. I prefer to look at it this way: if you have bought powdered baby formula, wondered about the safety of the Air Force's Airborne Laser program, or bought a set of tires for your car, my software helped bring those products about.

    Now if only I could get some help with the tape backup software I am writing...

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
  187. qmail?? by thewalled · · Score: 0

    Funny no one mentioned djb or vietse or my current favourite ethan galstad of nagios / netsaint fame..

    - dhawal

  188. What about art? by Doches · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm gonna have to throw in my $.02 for Everaldo Coelho. I mean, who out there isn't using Crystal icons?

    And, of course, everybody else at KDELook.org (yes, and Gnomelook.org)!

  189. Probably... by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    Probably some of those on the top of my list are;

    Pat Volkerding (of Slackware)

    Todd Kulesza (of Dropline Gnome, for Slackware).

    Ryan "Icclus" Gordon, for all of his work on games (even though they are commercial games)

    Michael Simms for publishing said commercial games for my open source platform of choice.

    Oh, and Manuel Jander for hacking shit shit out of the Aureal Vortex (even though I'm not using it anymore, his work just really impresses me).

    I wish I could personally thank everyone that contributes to the kernel, or my favorite programs that I use each day (Epiphany, Mozilla, Gnome, Evolution, X-Chat, etc.), but unfortuantely - such is the nature of software.

    I don't really think that it is any different than proprietary software though. Sure, people get paid with closed-source (and open, for that matter), but that's about all they get in return. With Free/OSS software, we all get great software in return. So, the hard work ends up paying off in some form or fashion. I don't code by trade, but I devote time in forums to helping others and try to help test and patch things. It all counts in the end.

  190. Me, Myself and I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For putting up with the fucked up shitty text installs of the early versions of Linux I looked at without hurling my 486 out the window.

  191. The users are the unsung heroes by mveloso · · Score: 1

    I nominate the users! Without them, OSS would be nothing. They (we) have had to tramp through jungles of man pages, frozen tundra of bugs, the lack-of-support desert, and climb huge learning curves.

    Hats off to OSS users and promoters!

  192. Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello
    the People here
    http://www.mozilla.org/about/stafflist.html# Staff- Members

    And Ben Goodger for some reason he is not listed here, Although their decision regarding removal of some stuff (css alt) is questionable to say the least, their contributions have made it possible for me to surf the web, without having the urge to throw the computer out the window. And lets not forget the developers of the Adblock extension:
    # Henrik Aasted
    # Wladimir Palant
    # rue
    # Stefan Kinitz
    # Aaron Spuler

    Who allow me to surf the web without throwing up.
    There are too many other people to mention and not enough space (example: Torisugari etc.) For their hard work in the ff project and extensions.

  193. Eric Allman by IckySplat · · Score: 1

    For Sendmail

    --
    Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
  194. What about me? by drsquare · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have contributed hundreds of thousands of lines to open source software, including x.org, glibc, the linux kernel, as well as doing tons to promote Linux usage in the UK. In fact, in the last two years I've gotten Linux onto around 200,000 computers across the country through my advocacy and consultancy. Just because I'm not mentioned in every other slashdot thread doesn't mean I'm not doing anything! Can't I get some recognition for my hard work please?

    1. Re:What about me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks drsquare.

  195. The thing is, the unsung heroes are the heroes. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    I wouldn't dare to suggest I'm in the same place, but as well as Chuchill and Monty, there were millions of guys trying to win WW2. The John Smiths and the Robert Joneses. Their wives who looked after other people's children when they were evacuated. The old men who worked as the home guard.

    OK, I sound like I'm ranting, but I see a lot of people contributing in a lot of ways. There's some great developers, there's institutions donating cash, artists making cool things like the Firefox logo. I know there are guys like Linus, RMS, Eric Raymond, Bram Cohen and others. It's also however about the Pierres, Pablos and Pauls who are writing little bits of documentation, answering pretty basic questions on forums, telling their boss to try out Linux or passing Mozilla CDs around.

  196. Steve Streeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definitely Steve Streeting of the OGRE.3D engine. He has an amazing dedication for the project and the engine bypasses many commercial engines out there with clean marks.

  197. Oso Martin by peteforsyth · · Score: 1

    Founder of FreeGeek. This growing organization in Porland Ore. recycles old computer equipment and installs OSS, and puts it in the hands of people who might not have the money for a computer or the motivation or skills to get into Linux or Open Source otherwise. FreeGeek has grown tremendously in the last few years and is getting national and maybe international attention.

  198. Gabest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without media player classic picking up where microsoft left off, I would be using crappy media players to watch movies.

  199. Brian Paul by flashdion · · Score: 1

    Mesa and much more. He is great!

  200. The Devs behind OpenZaurus / Opie by CoreDump01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because they continue to improve the software and even port it to new devices, long after the original Zaurus 5500 hit its EOL.

    Not even giving up in times when fewer and fewer devs contribute to the projects.

    They made the Zauri to the killer machines they are today.

    Way to go guys!

  201. Todd Kulesza of Dropline Gnome by Lispy · · Score: 1

    He is a great project leader and always dedicated with an open ear to the Dropline Community. He did such a great job in building Dropline-Gnome and serves the whole Slackware Community with the great and active forums, and he is still in his early 20s.

    Actually I believe that even if a deveolper or maintainer isn't famous in the sense that his name is known throughout the whole OSS-Community there is still the close community around his project and they know very well if the person is a "hero" or an asshole. In the case of the swaret project this seems to have backfired on the developers, despite having a good "product".

    1. Re:Todd Kulesza of Dropline Gnome by psyanide · · Score: 0

      And he's Dead Sexy! Woooowooo

      --
      -Psyanide-
    2. Re:Todd Kulesza of Dropline Gnome by Lispy · · Score: 1

      ...and taken, it appears. ;-)

  202. The inventors of the DIY ethic by FSK · · Score: 1

    The Ramones. They're not programmers; they might not even know how to use a computer but they created the "Do It Yourself" mentality that is the driving force of free software.

    --
    When punk rock is outlawed, only outlaws will have punk rock.
  203. Han-Wen Nienhuys and Jan Nieuwenhuizen by jdavidb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Han-Wen Nienhuys and Jan Nieuwenhuizen

    Bet you don't know what they did. They wanted good software for producing high quality music notation layouts. So they wrote it. And, thankfully, they made it free software to share with the world, so the next person who wanted good software for producing high quality music notation layouts could use what they had and improve on it instead of starting over.

    The result is GNU Lilypond. Currently it performs better than proprietary alternatives like Finale, but the interface is still text-based. But musicians tend to feel it does a superior layout job.

    If the guy who I had an email conversation with awhile back manages to get the Aiken 7-shape shaped note system implemented for Lilypond, I'll sing his name, too.

    1. Re:Han-Wen Nienhuys and Jan Nieuwenhuizen by Cronopios · · Score: 1

      I think most of the graphical programs for score editing out there (Rosegarden4, Noteedit, denemo, etc) can act as a frontend to GNU Lilypond, don't they?

      --
      Windows users:
      Internet Explorer is obsolete. Please upgrade to Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.
    2. Re:Han-Wen Nienhuys and Jan Nieuwenhuizen by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Denemo is specifically designed as just that. The others, I think, may be able to produce output designed to be fed into Lilypond. So, yes, it's possible.

      The interesting thing is that so far, many Lilypond users seem to prefer the textual interface.

    3. Re:Han-Wen Nienhuys and Jan Nieuwenhuizen by wolftone · · Score: 1

      Yes, in a matter of speaking, but in order for the output to look nice, the lilypond file has to be checked (at the very least). It's been awhile since I've tried Denemo, but I've had no success with Noteedit and marginal success with Rosegarden.

  204. Jeffrey Kingston by killmenow · · Score: 1

    Designed and developed lout. Saved me from LaTeX hell.

  205. Re:Closed source devs? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Thanks, that means a lot coming from someone of absolutely zero importance.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  206. LaMont Jones by WaxParadigm · · Score: 1

    I don't need to explain why to those familiar with LaMont.
    http://www.mmjgroup.com/

    1. Re:LaMont Jones by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should explain why to those who aren't familiar with him.

  207. SCO by Cabriel · · Score: 1

    Thanks for making the Closed Source guys look worse!

  208. Yukihiro Matsumoto, a.k.a Matz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kudos to Matz for creating Ruby, a very powerful, fully object oriented scripting languaje.

    -P@

  209. The esoteric OSS projects by ndogg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it is the developers of the little known OSS projects that are still being worked on simply due to the love they have for their projects that are the true unsung heroes of OSS.

    Contrary to what some believe about innovation within OSS, innovation does happen. The problem is that innovative and unique projects within the OSS arena get little to no fanfare, and are thusly ignored. When an OSS project develops functionality similar in nature to a closed, proprietary software package, it may well receive much attention and fanfare because people are familiar with the functionality, and with the OSS project, they are given an alternative. With something new, there is no marketing money behind it, and so no one knows about it, and no one is looking for it.

    For example, FrogJam was developed completely independantly, and from what I know, the original developer, plat, had no knowledge of anything even remotely similar to it when he conceived of the idea. He continues to work on it to this day for the love of it, even though he's the only person really working on it (despite what the developer's page says.)

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:The esoteric OSS projects by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      I think it is the developers of the little known OSS projects that are still being worked on simply due to the love they have for their projects that are the true unsung heroes of OSS.

      I agree, and these are the people I was hoping would really be discussed here (and thankfully, in some cases, they are).

      There have been lots of suggestions here for people who have developed major Open Source applications virtually everyone here on /. knows about -- and while these people have done some excellent work, many of them are already "well sung". But there are also people out there working on more esoteric projects which are exceedingly using to that 0.0001% of the software users out there who need it, but of whom we rarely ever hear anything about.

      I'm going to use my project as an example (hey, I'm a shameless promoter :) ), the jSyncManager. Here is a project for synchronizing PalmOS devices in Java-based environments. It's only useful to a subset of Palm-based handheld device owners (which is already a small subset of all PC owners) -- those who need consistent synchronization services for their devices across a variety of platforms, with Java-based tools for the rapid development of data synchronization logic.

      Most of our users aren't hard-core Open Source users that go around promoting our project -- it's corporations running mixed environments that aren't server by other solutions. The end-user with a few Linux boxes will probably run pilot-link or coldsync (because they're built into most distros and are native code). End users running Windows or OS X are probably running PalmSource's HotSync Manager.

      We're a specialized tool which fits a niche no other tool fits into -- but because of this, our target user base isn't massive.

      And yet we have a number of people who have taken time to contribute to our project, because they wanted a single sync solution that runs on all their platforms, because they want something better than what they're currently running (and yes, in my very biased opinion the jSyncManager is a vastly better API/framework/application base than pilot-link, coldsync, or Palm's HotSync Manager :) ).

      So big props go out to David Bartmess, Ian Dallas, Anuj Agrawal, Steven Levine and Bob Yurkovic for everything they've contributed to the project. These guys have donated their time, and they've received for their hard work even less recognition than I have. Thanks guys -- you may be unknown to the /. masses, but you've all done an excellent job, and are my Open Source heroes.

      Brad BARCLAY
      Lead Developer & Project Administrator,
      The jSyncManager Project.

  210. me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because i'm selfish

  211. Obligatory Lisp kudoses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raymond "Real Hacker" Toy; Where would CMUCL be without you?

    Others notable hackers.

    Bill Newman
    Christopher Rhodes
    Brian Rice*
    Daniel Barlow
    Mike MacDonald
    Bruno Haibel, Sam Steigold, Michael Stoll

    --
    * For comic relief.

  212. Dan J. Bernstein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Qmail.. djbdns... daemontools... ucspi-tcp... all good, quality--and at the risk of jinxing it--secure software.

    http://cr.yp.to/

  213. Tom Lane by ahammond · · Score: 1

    How about Tom Lane? He's third as most prolific open source copyright holder behind "The Regents of the University of California" and "The Free Software Foundation".

    1. Re:Tom Lane by gavinroy · · Score: 1

      2nd'ed :)

    2. Re:Tom Lane by tgl · · Score: 1

      That's a fairly silly stat, actually. The reason it shows up is not so much lines-of-source-code as everyone-on-the-planet-uses-libjpeg. The survey you're thinking of counted references, not net lines of code.

      Not that I'm not proud of libjpeg. But UCB and FSF and MIT have certainly done a ton more open code than that.

    3. Re:Tom Lane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He also wrote libjpeg, which is used in most programs that support JPEG (even including Microsoft Internet Explorer).

    4. Re:Tom Lane by davegaramond · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Tom Lane's dedication to the PostgreSQL project (including being active in the users' mailiing lists) is admirable.

  214. The Original DIKU MUD Team by lordmage · · Score: 1

    without which.. we would not have a TON of great MUDS.

    Mudding being a huge staple of Internet life in college time back when all us Open Source people were getting started.

    --
    I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
  215. Rethink the 'About MyApp' Dialog by Saeger · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Nobody's said this yet (in a +4), but the easiest and most visible way for the unsung devs to get some credit would be rethink how the 'Help > About' dialog was layed out, and when it's displayed.

    So, put your goofiest team headshots in there, bio, paypal links, blinken lights, ... whatever. That's the easiest way to get more credit where credit is due, if that's what you're after. As opposed to "Written by Joe Schmoe in 1999. Humble pie documentation by John Smith.".

    Also, on app startup, it's wouldn't be such a bad idea to display an about-random-developer splash page for a couple seconds. If people REALLY don't care, they can just disable the splash as you can in most apps.

    Obviously, this works best in client apps moreso than background daemons and such.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Rethink the 'About MyApp' Dialog by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not that I know any of these people's names, but I always loved finding developer pictures in the about boxes on my old mac programs, which is about the only place you would regularly see that. (I was a mac-head around the time when System 7 came out. I got better.) :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  216. i fourth that by toiletmonster · · Score: 1

    just to see if anyone will fifth.

  217. David Beazley by hobuddy · · Score: 1
    and the rest of the Simplified Wrapper and Interface Generator (SWIG) team.

    If you use Python, Perl, PHP, Ruby, or TCL chances are you use a multitude of libraries that would've been prohibitively laborious to wrap without SWIG.

    --
    Erlang.org: wow
  218. Jim McQuillan of LTSP by phornung · · Score: 1

    I nominate Jim McQuillan of the LTSP Project because this project gives the ability to run Linux on cheap hardware.

    This provides a great solution for developing countries and underprivileged schools a chance to compete and contribute.

    As you can see on the site, he handles the PR side of open source very well, and he still hangs around in the IRC channel and is very friendly and helpful.

  219. Bernie Galler by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    The earliest item I ever saw that made an explicit call for open source software and against software as proprietary / for-profit / trade secret / etc. was a letter from Bernie Galler. It's in the same issue of CACM as Djikstra's "Goto Considered Harmful" letter which started the whole structured programming flap.

    In it, Bernie noted that the authors of some particular set of subroutines were, though distributing them, charging a round-number price significantly higher than the cost of making and shipping a copy of the card deck. From this he predicted the potential for the rise of software-as-product, the demise of the then-current free exchange and reuse of software (in both the academic and commercial community), vast duplication of effort, increases of software costs, proprietary claims, etc. And he argued against the adoption of that model as being a far greater loss than gain.

    Bernie's own contributions to open software (in that era BEFORE closed software and afterward), personal, organizational, and educational, are far to numerous to go into here. But IMHO he's the very first spokesman to explicitly, in a widely-read public forum, argue for free software (as in both speech AND beer).

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  220. A lot of important stuff is often not visible by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Software that provides user-visible features is easy to identify and nominate, but there's a slew of very important and useful OS-level stuff that is invisible and "just works". This kind of software only becomes visible when it breaks.

    As an example, one area that I have been involved with is flash file system storage. Flash file systems underpin a slew of embedded and mobile applications (PDAs, phones, television sets,....). A reliable flash file system is a very valuable chunk of code that is invisible to most people using it.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  221. Tom Lane by jadavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tom Lane, one of the core developers of PostgreSQL RDBMS, is an amazing developer.

    He cranks out new features, fixes difficult bugs, helps the release process, and answers questions to newbies and developers alike.

    He can break down a tough problem in no time and give the real answer clearly. He knows when a feature is just the latest DB buzzword and won't be a net win. He'll explain for the 1000th time why PostgreSQL is not using an index on someone's 12-record test data, or autogenerated test data where 90% of the records match.

    He is a brilliant developer and has taught me a lot about practical database development.

    --
    Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
  222. Alan Eldredge: RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The late FreeBSD ports maintainer deserves credit, so I thought I'd mention him here.

  223. Don Yacktman and Patrick Taylor's modest proposal by JQuick · · Score: 1

    They are both unsung, and many are certainly grateful for their contribution.

    In early 1999 they wrote several articles and started a petition for releasing Macos X as open source. Their original goal was two-fold. They wanted Apple to release the core OS as open source, and for apple to continue selling and supporting "Yellow Box" development tools on Intel platforms. Apple did not continue supporting their development tools on either Windows (or on what was then Rhapsody for Intel). However, Apple subsequently released Darwin, and a number of other software projects, under an open source license.

    Apple's increasing use of numerous BSD and GPL licensed code has resulted in a steady stream of patches both from Apple itself and from Apple users which are fed back upstream to the original projects. Projects ranging from OSes, utilities, compilers, and applications, benefit directly from these contributions.

    Apple developers, OpenDarwin developers, and users of Macos X and darwin, have contributed improvements to FreeBSD, samba, Konquerer/KHTML, procmail, gcc, and many other projects. These contributions cross OS and license boundaries, benefiting linux users, BSD users, and users of open source tools on other commercial OSes.

    Though Don Yacktman and Patrick Taylor were not directly affiliated with Apple, I am sure their voices and the voices of those whom they inspired, influenced Apple's decision. Don's prior work on projects like MiscKit, provided great value to NeXTStep and OPENSTEP developers. However, I believe that the petition for opening Macos X has done far more.

    These names are probably unknown to most slashdot readers. A large percentage of users of open source OSes and tools have probably benefited indirectly from Apple's choice to release Darwin. These men helped influence that decision if not inspire it.

    Unsung hero seems an apt description.

  224. NetCat by tyler_larson · · Score: 1
    How about "Hobbit", whowever the hell he is.

    Donno where I'd be with good ol' "nc".

    --
    "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
    RFC 1925
  225. Xavier Leroy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xavier Leroy, For OCaml system and Linux's Posix Threads.

  226. Tridge! by RustyTaco · · Score: 1

    Andrew Tridgell because rsync 0wnz0rs! Then there's that little "Samba" thing, and ccache.

    - RustyTaco

  227. But QMail's not open source! by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not that I object to the nomination of Russ, who's done a lot more than that, but his contributions to a support list for a decidedly NOT open source MTA is hardly a good justification for calling him an unsung hero of open source!

    If we were limited to picking just one unsung hero, I'd probably vote for Roland McGrath over Russ, but since nobody said I had to vote for just one, I'll happily give Russ a vote too. :)

    1. Re:But QMail's not open source! by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      > a decidedly NOT open source MTA

      Qmail is not Open Source, but it is "open source". Or something like that.

    2. Re:But QMail's not open source! by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      But qmail is a lot more not not open source than Microsoft is not not open source. djb has written a lot of code that he's put into the public domain. You have to pick your friends carefully (just don't pick your friends nose carefully!).
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  228. Re:Bernie Galler - Software Patent Institute by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Looking for more about Bernie I happened to notice that he's the current president of the Software Patent Institute.

    The SPI (which has both pro- and anti- software patent members) is attempting to solve the bogus software patent problem by making available a searchable database of software prior art.

    This database, incidentally, is also a useful for anybody who wants to avoid having to reinvent a software wheel and to keep software breakthroughs from getting lost.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  229. Got my vote! by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    I may be prejudiced, because I've known Roland since, well, since the day he was born. But on the other hand, I can say that about a lot of people, but none of the others have their names on so much of the software I use daily. In fact, very few people as unknown as Roland have their names on so much of the software I use daily. :)

    While RMS has been the very-visible leader and statesman of the FSF and the GNU Project, Roland has quietly been one of their most prolific coders and best project leaders. Very good nomination, IMO.

  230. Re:Closed source devs? by orasio · · Score: 1

    I agree with you, I don't think it's flamebait, it's just slightly offtopic.

    I believe that developers of free software (software libre) do deserve more respect than the ones that don't, from an ethical standpoint.
    Proprietary software has restrictions that many of us (sadly not _that_ many) feel should not exist.
    Software is one of the most important tools for any field, and restricting, or working for those who restrict the use of software, is not something admirable _ethically_.
    That, plus I believe ethics is more important that technical capabilities. So, there you have, at least someone believes the guy who wrote mIRC _is_ less worthy of respect for that fact than the one who maintains or supports free (GPL, BSD..) software.

  231. I am by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am the unsung hero of open source. Sitting right here at my desk in front of my computer reading slashdot.

    Would you like to ask something?
    or wait...

  232. People by julesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lots of people already mentioned, but also one that doesn't seem to have been...

    Simon Tatham, author of PuTTY. Which probably qualifies as one of the most commonly used pieces of free software on Windows. He also wrote almost all of NASM (to which I contributed a little), and I've seen his name in the Linux kernel too (to be precise, it was in the VGA console driver code).

    If you're ever in Coventry again, I'll buy you a drink. :)

  233. anybody who by geekoid · · Score: 1

    stands to loose something by advocating it, and advocates it anyways.

    The teacher who pushes for an open source 'office' suite. The admin who pusshes to get Linux into the a server room in a MS shop.

    The government person who installed linux instead of MS.

    It's one thing to run something becasue you believe in it, it's another to believe in it enough to risk your job and/or reputation.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  234. I'm biased by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

    I'm biased, but I think everyone at Free Geek has done a very good job at bringing Linux and Free Software to the masses, at least those of the masses living in the Portland area.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  235. You know someone is a geek... by JakeThompson1 · · Score: 1

    and he uses vi.

    ...when they judge people on their choice of editor.

  236. Zack Brown by BigBadaboom · · Score: 1

    Who since Jan 1999 has produced a weekly summary of the discussions on the linux-kernel mailing list. Thank you Zack!

  237. I fifth that by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

    Gvim is a great little program, even if I haven't got around to setting it as my default editor at work (Visual Studio 7)

  238. Alfredo Kojima by Abattoir · · Score: 1

    Original author of Window Maker, as well as the rest of the Window Maker developers. I haven't followed the development in recent years, but I've been using it since the original "stable" release, 0.6.3, or around 8 years ago.

    I'm even running it under cygwin on Windows :D.

  239. Eben Moglen by Subm · · Score: 1

    Eben Moglen co-wrote the GPL and is probono counsel to the Free Software Foundation.

    What makes free software free is how its creators choose to share it with the rest of the world. That's a social agreement. The GPL codifies that contract and it's held up admirably all this time.

    When people say the GPL hasn't been challenged it's a good thing. It means the GPL was written well.

  240. Jeffrey Altman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeff is of Kermit, Kerberos, OpenAFS fame. I have been trundling along with Kerberos and OpenAFS. He has been ever helpful.

    And oh yeah, he writes the code too.

  241. cURL by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    cURL, not to be confused with the abortion that was (is?) proprietary and expensive and therefore doomed Curl (sorry, Tim, I guess everyone can have a bad idea once), is fantastic. Used to be I hated that my RedHat boxes didn't have wget but rather curl. I was familiar with wget. However, curl is great for automation (file upload posts, for example) and seems to be much more rounded out than any other CLI utility I've used. For pure programability I personally like Perl module LWP and its cousins, but for shell scripts, cron jobs, one-liners curl is King.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  242. Mike Watts by sploo22 · · Score: 1

    The late Mike Watts, a moderator at JustLinux.com. He helped literally thousands of people get started in the world of Linux before he finally passed away.

    You will be missed mdwatts. :(

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  243. Bryce Harrington by brisgeek · · Score: 1

    Bryce Harrington of the Inkscape team is definetly number one in my book. He displays amazing skill at both improving and managing the development of inkscape. And the Inkscape team, Open Clipart Library and many other projects would be lost without him. Also Mentalguy and Bulia from the Inkscape team are both dedicated, talented and definitely heros of opensource

    --
    - Andy Fitzsimon
  244. Re:Larry Jones & Mark Baushke, CVS mailing lis by doom · · Score: 1
    Try getting around a bit more... a few web searches will show you some of the common CVS criticisms. Before using any new tool, I do seaches on the phrases "___ sucks" and "___ considered harmful". (And if you don't get any hits on those, then the code is obviously too new to be relied on.)

    There are a bunch of competitors to the CVS throne. Prominent names that come to mind:

    • subversion
    • Gnu Arch
    • Vesta
    There's also the now venerable but proprietary perforce, and the proprietary bitkeeper (which is gratis, but only under some circumstances).
  245. HT Track by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1

    I've submitted a lot of bug reports and patches to various software projects -- but typically only the 1 or 2 fixes that I need to get it working for me. So I have a not-too-deep but very broad interaction with a lot of different GPL & BSD projects. In fact, I've even submitted patches to projects with closed-source (like faqts -- gave them patches to better rank members and score answers... but they never made any improvement using my code or anyone else's). In fact, the faqts site is par-for-the-course. Most projects don't seem to respond.

    So I would nominate the gentleman behind HT Track. I sent him a bug report with pseudo-code as a guess to how to fix it. The very next day, he had sent me a thank-you email and had released a new version. I also found the Mozilla team to be very responsive to my suggestions here on Slashdot (one post turned into a new Mozilla feature -- pre-fetching). And the HTML-Kit team is very responsive to bug reports and patches too. I like all three teams at the geek level. They're responsive and accept code, even cleaning up my poorly done offerings. I feel quite happy to call them unsung heroes of the OSS movement, and I'd feel even happier if they were sung heroes.

  246. He wrote more than Vi by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Try BSD!

    It was his project to improve some ancient Sys-III code.

    Later other grads came to work on it and it forked into BSD Unix.

    SysV and many things in all unixies originated under BSD. Sure Bell Labs changed it and made it incompatible but it certainly influenced it.

    Oh and BSD Unix 4.2 gave rise to TCP/IP and was the first OS out of the box that came networked by default.

    Thank you Bill. You have certainly changed the computing landscape alot.

  247. Markus Friedl by ^BR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On word: OpenSSH.

    He did not write it alone, one must not forget the work of Tatu Ylonen but singlehandledly wrote the SSH2 support integrated in the same daemon (ssh.com one forks a different daemon based on the protocol) in a very short time, making it the best SSH implementation around.

  248. "michael" from Slashdot by stor · · Score: 1

    ...for giving people a target for their frustration.

    People can vent their frustration by flaming poor ol' michael then return to coding in a better, self-righteous mood.

    What a martyr, rolling with the punches for the Greater Good(tm). I mean... err... fuck you Michael!

    Cheers
    Stor

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  249. Whiner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you like doing open source, then do it. Don't whine about not being thanked. If you want to be thanked for it, put it in the license that people have to thank you.

    It's not charity if you want something back.

  250. For 3D fun by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Ton Roosendaal of Blender
    and
    Jorrit Tyberghein of Crystal Space

  251. Derek Dresser by Goeland86 · · Score: 1

    He's the guy that converted my high-school to Open-source. And I don't mean only part of it. The whole campus is running open-source. Everyone knows has to learn how to use openoffice, icewm and shared folders as well as email to submit homework to teachers. He's the one who basically showed the efficiency of the LTSP project (here) in a private medium size organization. His actions have made it possible to have only 3 people in the IT department for the service of 250 people altogether. He's also the one who taught linux classes and helped me follow through my independent study of computer graphics. Derek is my hero, and I hope sometime he'll read this.

    --
    ---- I am certain of only one thing : I know nothing else.
  252. David MacKenzie by robos · · Score: 1

    Go and grep through a some man-pages and see who keeps popping up: David MacKenzie I think this is his homepage: http://www.djmnet.org/ Thanks David!

  253. Daniel Horn, creator of Vegastrike by DMJC-L · · Score: 1

    Daniel Horn, creator of Vegastrike, gave the world a brilliant open source game, and introduced me to open source softwar and linux, without which i'd still be running a windows machine.

  254. Re:Larry Jones & Mark Baushke, CVS mailing lis by boots@work · · Score: 1

    I don't know if Vesta is much of a contender. It looks like it's hard to adopt for projects that are not totally prepared to buy into its way of doing everything.

    A more interesting new open project is Darcs: much simpler than BitKeeper or Arch, but nearly as powerful (at least for small-medium projects.)

  255. Gurusamy Sarathy - Perl on Windows by ZeekWatson · · Score: 1

    Sarathy was the force behind making Perl work well on Windows.

    Anyone using Perl on Windows can attest to its seamless integration.

    Thanks man!

    http://www.ActiveState.com/Company/people_senior .p lex#gurusamy

  256. Ton Roosendal -- Blender by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blender was GPLed and now kicking.

  257. Re:Eric Andreychek (Openthought) by Mandrel · · Score: 1

    Interesting! I've been using a hidden (Javascript-calling and DOM-manipulating) Java applet to make my browser-based user interfaces work like normal applications, but Openthought has done this using pure Javascript in a hidden frame: fake a form submission to send data from the browser to the server-side code; use Javascript in the page returned by the form submission to update the browser display.

    The advantange of this is that the UI can be on a separate computer from the application logic. A current disadvantage is that the application must be written in Perl.

    Can Openthought handle asynchronous updates of the UI by the server? That is, in response to some external event or timeout, rather than triggered directly by the user manipulating the UI?

  258. Matthew Dillon by xedx · · Score: 1
    Not http://imdb.com/name/nm0000369/ or http://imdb.com/name/nm0227037/ but the http://www.dragonflybsd.org/ lead.
    This line (-- "The man who sold his soul to code so much so quickly."--) on /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/eql.txt says it all.
    try
    bsd:/usr/src% grep -rs "[dD]illon" *
    and
    linux:/usr/src/linux$ grep -r "[dD]illon" *
    1. Re:Matthew Dillon by dunham · · Score: 1

      I'll second this. When I was young and poor I had my parents get me his Amiga C compiler as a christmas gift. I learned a lot from reading the code for his C library, editor (DME), and networking layer (dlink). And I learned a lot playing with these tools.

      I spend most of my time with Linux now, but I was happy to learn a few years ago that he was still at it, hacking on BSD.

  259. Andrew Newman by quoll · · Score: 1

    The original question suggested mentioning people in your own company who push to open source a project against all opposition. Andrew is passionately devoted to open source, and without him the Kowari RDF database would never have been released, or become the project that it is.

    Lots of us write open source code, but it takes people who'll lay it on the line like Andrew did to make a real difference.

  260. Michael Wu by LightSail · · Score: 1

    He is building the adm8211 driver for wifi, and represents the FOSS developer that sees a problem and builds a solution. Yes, I am using that driver to make this comment.

    Michael, this buds for you.

  261. Juan Jose Ciarlante by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hes my teacher at university.
    Hes devoted to open source and a great person also.
    I really admire open source people for their contribution to society.
    UM - MENDOZA - ARGENTINA

  262. mitchell baker of Mozilla by asa · · Score: 5, Informative

    A decent list of unsung heros would be thousands of people long and still miss contributors that play(ed) very important roles in all of the open source software we use today.

    I don't know nearly as many people as I should and I certainly haven't done enough to thank or otherwise praise many of the open source contributors who have been giving to projects, large and small, that I use every day. This topic has prompted me to start looking a little bit closer.

    There is one person I do know who has had a huge impact on the entire open source world as well as my open source continent (Mozilla) that doesn't get the recognition she deserves.

    Michell Baker of the Mozilla Foundation is definitely a hero. The author of the MPL and the Chief Lizard Wrangler for the Mozilla project, she has been a driving force behind the Mozilla projects since the beginning. Without Mitchell, Mozilla just wouldn't be where it is today.

    --Asa

  263. Doc Searls by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    His column in Linux Journal is "Linux for Suits". Doc is the guy who's giving talks and making the pitch to the decisionmakers in the boardrooms. They even listen some! That is where the battle will be won.

    Read some of his work, he can really get the message across. In 4 years of receiving the magazine I have never read him pushing one distro over another, he seems to want them all to win. He also give insight in what changes are needed to gain greater acceptance in the business world.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  264. The Elder Gods by senahj · · Score: 1

    Henry Spencer
    Chris Torek
    Steve Summit

    "He's no fun -- he fell right over."

    --
    Wait a minute. Didn't I say that on the other side of the record? I'd better check ...
  265. ROFL by kikta · · Score: 2, Funny
    My mum knows who Linus Torvalds is.

    Ok, no fair! Anyone besides Alan Cox. :-D
  266. My take on the underrated ;) by pdamoc · · Score: 1

    Robin Dunn, head of wxpython
    Neil Hodgson, head of Scintilla/SciTE project
    and
    Bram Cohen creator of the BitTorent

  267. Re:ME! (and a friend) - Steering IBM's Ship of Sta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JFS? That baby is rock solid, my power goes out and my jfs partitions come right back up - thanks unnamed IBM monkeys!

  268. I'd vote - but I'm forking the awards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the spirit of open source, I'm setting up my own awards ceremony.

    Who wants to suck up to me ?

  269. Bram Moolenaar by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Author of vim. When you spend some time figuring out a program to the bottom you tend to know who the author is.

    Some other people too, but I cannot remember their names since they are Slavic and unpronouncable.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:Bram Moolenaar by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Some other people too, but I cannot remember their names since they are Slavic and unpronouncable.

      Score: -1, racist

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  270. The founders of Cygnus by Ian+Lance+Taylor · · Score: 1

    The founders of Cygnus Support, later Cygnus Solutions, later a part of Red Hat, for showing, in 1989, that you really could create a business on free software: David Henkel-Wallace, Michael Tiemann, John Gilmore.

  271. Wietse Venema by dhammabum · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Author of postfix and co-author of the Coroner's Toolkit (along with Dan Farmer).

    An IBM research fellow. Nice guy.

    --
    I am not a robot. I am a unicorn.
  272. GAIM by Andrew+Dvorak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a piece of software that many of us geeks can't live without. And while you hard core geeks might be thinking "That Jabber Author Guy" .. but most people I know, including myself, uses Gaim on Linux. Heck, there are many AIM clients even for Mac OS X that use the gaim core (ie. Adium and Fire) ... and a bunch of others even on other platforms.

    While GAIM is radically different from when he passed on development to the community, let's not forget Mark Spencer for having brought us the original gaim, which evolved into the product that most of us use.

    (Let's not also forget the current maintainers at: http://gaim.sourceforge.net/contactinfo.php )

  273. Mark Mitchell has many talents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He writes the software: for example, the C++ parser in gcc.

    He manages the software: he's release manager for gcc. This is a huge and complicated job.

    And he founded a small business, CodeSourcery, which employs 8 people and works mostly on free software (FSF toolchain and others). Mark's business savvy means that besides Mark, seven other engineers devote most of their professional time to free software development.

    Plus, I will say from personal experience that Mark is a nice guy and easy to talk to.

  274. Cowboy Neal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm... What about this Cowboy Neal guy ? Why doesn't anyone mention his name ? Is the meme dead already ?

  275. One of the main creators of Ant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supposedly he lives near me someplace.

    Thank you Ant guy for making my life so much better and so much more miserable!!!

  276. More than that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you click on the link with JavaScript enabled, a copy of the contents of your clipboard will be sent to cshacks.partycat.us.

  277. Lawsuit Victims by protektor · · Score: 1

    How about some of the victims of lawsuits against Open Source packages/programs and some of the professors and others who have fought for the legal rights of Open Source. The people who decide to fight against the DMCA rather than fold up their tents and go away under threat of lawsuits.

  278. It's alive by eldacan · · Score: 1

    Well as it's said on the hurd-devel page:

    To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the Hurd-devel-readers Archives. (The current archive is only available to the list members.)

    I guess that's why you don't see anything after april here.

    But the Hurd is definitely alive. See:

    http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/l4-hurd/
    http ://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/
    http://li sts.gnu.org/archive/html/help-hurd/
    http://lists. debian.org/debian-hurd/

  279. Communist? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    An organization making extensive use of copyright communist?

    I am sure you know in communist regimes there is not such a thing as copytight since anything produced belongs to the state.

    You could not be more off the make, even if you intended the above as a joke.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Communist? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      There are no communist regimes - when there's a state, it's still socialism. The FSF owns copyrights as a method to keep them from ownership by another, which might not protect them rigorously, or share them. Stallman's the leading communist in the world today, though he's not perfect. Neither have been any other communists, in name or deed. But at least Stallman's property can be shared easily.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Communist? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      In communist regimes, there is no regime.

      Really, the word is used in many different senses.
      There definitely are senses of the term in which
      the entire GNU project is a communist project.
      It's not helpful to respond to such a use with a
      reactive reflex that assumes the term to have a
      very different meaning.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  280. For me, that would be: by mirabilos · · Score: 1

    * my grandmother, keeping me mentally and financially up a bit
    * the following OpenBSD developers, who helped me a lot:
    Todd Fries
    Dale Rahn
    Ted Unangst
    partially Henning Brauer
    * the company who now is known as SCOX, but released
    ancient UNIX(R) and BSD under a 4-clause UCB-style
    BSD licence in 2002: Caldera
    (they also released DOS...)
    * not exactly open source, but nice too:
    http://museum.borland.com/
    * of course, everyone who has directly contributed
    to MirOS (the operating system I develop),
    including a fascinating team of developers.

    --
    My Karma isn't excellent, damn it! (And /. still does not get UTF-8 right in 2012. Wow.)
  281. We go again because people like you are too dense by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Linux is the kernel. Now what can you do with only that?

    All the traditional UNIX like OS utilities are GNU software, which is the foundation for any other application.

    The utilities and the kernel (which is wah you traditionally receive in any distribution) should, righty, be called GNU/Linux.

    I wish we don't have to "go again" through this, but misinformed people spread like a pest og Biblical proportions.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  282. X-Free developers by nibelung · · Score: 1
    Quite a few of them, working quietly on X-Free for ages to add new features and support new graphics chipsets. And most of the time they appear to get bashed for it, or are forgotten about.

    X-Free has gotten rarkably little praise, compared to (for example) the Linux kernel while both are very complex projects, have the same importance and have been around for just as long. Although the number of contributors to X-Free is probably a lot smaller.

    So here's a BIG THANK YOU to the guys who made X-Free!

  283. Re:The esoteric OSS projects - Matt Simerson by Havokmon · · Score: 1
    I think it is the developers of the little known OSS projects that are still being worked on simply due to the love they have for their projects that are the true unsung heroes of OSS.

    Matt Simerson has an awesome Qmail Toaster script with all the extra fixins. Qmail is a bitch to wrap your brain around to begin with, but his Perl scripts help you quickly and easily get a qmail/webmail system up and running.

    http://www.tnpi.biz

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  284. Mark Spencer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. has written a *lot* of incredibly good software however seems not to be known/credited.
    *t

  285. Kern Sibbald et al for Bacula (great backup sys!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'd have to nominate Kern for his spectacular Backup system (Bacula) which has saved me endless hours of work and the data of some of my computer illiterate friends/co-workers. (imagine the look on somebody's face when their 60GB HDD head-crashes)

    Runners up would be Dan Langille (very active Bacula developer), Nicolas Boichat (for the wx-windows gui) and José Luis Tallón for the Debian packages.

  286. GNU LibC suffers from NIH syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are willing to adopt dozens of non-standard GNU functions, but refuse to adopt the most basic security measures like strlcpy() because it was invented by OpenBSD. Every other OS, even Solaris has it. Gee, I wonder why Linux has so many security problems???

  287. the first thing that popped into my head... by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

    ...the users ;-)

    There are some open source projects out there that are absolutely amazing (Firefox for example) - but then there are those others out there when I wonder how a user ever made it through the installation, let alone some of the horrid interfaces and critical bugs. It is those persistent users out there who think nothing of tedious installs, manage to deal with some of the worst interfaces, and patiently, dutifully submitting every bug they run into. Volunteering their time and thoughts with only a vague promise of usable software in return.

    They are the ones I'm amazed at. My hat's off to them.

  288. Heros by zygut · · Score: 1

    Weitse Verma for making my life of sendmail hell go away (no offense EA), and tirelessly answering email on the postfix-users list.

    The guys who wrote screen, which from what I can tell are:

    1987 Oliver Laumann
    1991 Wayne Davidson
    1993 Juergen Weigert
    1993 Michael Schroeder

    and all the debian package maintainers that are making installing software so much easier.

  289. Jef Poskanzer by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    Okay, okay, of course Jef Poskanzer should be nominated. He's written all sorts of cool software (including pbmplus, which I've used about every other day for the last twenty years or whatever), and has some really neato hacks on his web page, including ACME Mapper, which I also use every day.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  290. Re:We go again because people like you are too den by dbIII · · Score: 1
    The utilities and the kernel (which is wah you traditionally receive in any distribution) should, righty, be called GNU/Linux.
    Once again, there is a lot of stuff there that was not developed by the gnu team - hence the suggestion by RMS some time back to call it LiGnuX. If we were to credit every significant group that contirbuted it would be a very long name. Those who go to the trouble to put together distributions get to name the distribution - like Redhat linux, knoppix etc.

    You don't get to name other people projects, that is really the only relevant issue here.

  291. Olin Shivers by tmilford · · Score: 1

    Author of scsh[1].

    His documentation is especially well written.

    [1]
    http://www.scsh.net

  292. Re:Larry Jones & Mark Baushke, CVS mailing lis by doom · · Score: 1
    boots@work wrote:
    I don't know if Vesta is much of a contender. It looks like it's hard to adopt for projects that are not totally prepared to buy into its way of doing everything.
    Well, you could be right that that will make too many people reluctant to try it, but on the other hand "make" is almost as creaky and problematic as CVS (we're just -- mostly -- used to dancing around make's problems). Replacing both make and cvs in one-shot, with a mature, well-tested code base has it's appeals.
  293. What about Fred Fish? by bdraschk · · Score: 1

    Who still remembers the good ol' Fish Disks (not CDs) for the Amiga?

  294. Tuomo Valkonen by DrMorris · · Score: 1

    He wrote the window manager I was always looking for: ion.

    I now use it more than a year and I am very happy with it. If you prefer the keyboard to operate your computer, try out this fine wm, you might like it!

  295. Re:"There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch"

    If you mean it LITERALLY : I have had many free meals, from milk at my mother's breast to church socials to political cook-outs to eating nature's bounty growing wild.

    If you mean it FIGUREATIVELY, take a breath; you paid what for that oxygen?

    Saying there is no free lunch is just a way of excusing greedy ungenerous behavior. Profit, in a well balanced life, has its place; as does generosity. It is not for nothing that Jesus told the rich to GIVE AWAY THEIR WEALTH and that a rich man going to heaven was like a camel going through the eye of a needle (can't be done). What's in your bank account could be saving babies (the innocent) lives? What are YOUR priorities?

  296. Re:"There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch" by iamcf13 · · Score: 1
    Your remarks remind me of a story I heard quite a while back. It may be true but I am not sure.

    Some programmer at some company somewhere (it was probably Microsoft) was introduced to somebody.

    The programmer's reply to the somebody he was being introduced to: "Do I need to know you?"

    Then, on a related note, Bill Gates was quoted as saying, essentially, "churchgoing (or attending any worship service) is a waste of time."

    And don't forget Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer proclaiming "I...love...this...company! Yeeeessss!" at the end of the (in)famous 'monkeyboy' video clip.

    In the end, it all ultimately boils down to this:


    [24] No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
    -- Matthew 6:24 of the KJV Bible at umich.edu