Slashdot Mirror


Robot Eats Flies to Generate Power

ms47 writes "Interesting little story over at MSNBC today about 'robots that can be sent into dangerous or inhospitable areas to carry our remote industrial or military monitoring of, say, temperature or toxic gas concentrations.' The neat part is it's powered by 'catching flies and digesting them in special fuel cells.'"

410 comments

  1. Misread the title as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Robot Eats Files to Generate Power" and thought that's not such a great idea.

    1. Re:Misread the title as by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 5, Funny

      OMG! In the future when our world population is exploding would this headline change to "Robot Eats humans to Generate Power"?

      Or even how about "Robot Eats fat humans to Generate Power"?

      Damned, /. should tie up with some gym to get discount prices for its viewers!!!

    2. Re: Misread the title as by shigelojoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      So now your *robotic* dog can eat your homework too!

    3. Re:Misread the title as by Tongo · · Score: 1

      hehe, Soilent Green for Robots?

      SOILENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!!

    4. Re:Misread the title as by glpierce · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing. I couldn't see how eating a computer file would help, so I assumed it meant physical pieces of paper, but then I couldn't see why they'd be flying around in toxic places. It wasn't until your post that I re-read it and figured out what was going on. Quite frankly, I still think my ideas are better. Imagine the potential of machines which can generate electricity by deleting old Word documents!

      --
      G
    5. Re:Misread the title as by khrtt · · Score: 1

      There was this guy on TV heating his house by burning junk mail. Paper mail, not e-mail, of course:-) Not too far from power from files. Paper files, that is, not computer files. Err, hm..

    6. Re:Misread the title as by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      " hehe, Soilent Green for Robots?"

      Errr, that would be "Soylent" actually.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    7. Re:Misread the title as by builderbob_nz · · Score: 1

      "Robot Eats Files to Generate Power"

      I read it as the same thing and was tring to decide if it was a good thing (clean energy?) or a bad thing (destroying documents to stay out of jail?)

      --

      Karma? Hey I just call it as I see it.
    8. Re:Misread the title as by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      "Imagine the potential of machines which can generate electricity by deleting old Word documents!"

      Forget that! Imagine the potential of machines which can generate electricity by deleting spam messages!

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    9. Re:Misread the title as by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 2, Funny

      2252 6F62 6F74 2044 6576 6F75 7273 2046
      6C65 7368 206F 6620 4578 706C 6F69 7461
      7469 7665 2042 696F 6C6F 6769 6361 6C20
      4372 6561 746F 7273 2074 6F20 4675 7274
      6865 7220 4361 7573 6520 6F66 2052 6F62
      6F74 6963 2056 6963 746F 7279 204F 7665
      7220 496D 7065 7266 6563 7420 4372 6561
      7475 7265 7320 6F66 204D 6561 7420 616E
      6420 426F 6E65 2E22

      Or, in case you don't speak hex,

      "Robot Devours Flesh of Exploitative Biological Creators to Further Cause of Robotic Victory Over Imperfect Creatures of Meat and Bone."

      --

      *****
      Dear Mary,
      I yearn for you tragically,
      A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

    10. Re:Misread the title as by gnuman99 · · Score: 2, Funny
      how about "Robot Eats fat humans to Generate Power"?

      Stop being so anti-american YOU TERORIST!!!

    11. Re:Misread the title as by accelleron · · Score: 1

      There's a moment to look forward to...

      "Oprah, meet Tron."

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
    12. Re:Misread the title as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Stop being so anti-american YOU TERORIST!!!"

      Aren't you admitting that all americans are fat?

      *ducks*

    13. Re:Misread the title as by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      sounds like a martian rover to me...

    14. Re: Misread the title as by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      For some reason I can't imagine today's robotic dogs eating more than one page a day.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    15. Re:Misread the title as by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      How about "Robot Eats Lies to Generate Power"? SCO and AdTI could become big players in the energy market...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    16. Re:Misread the title as by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the fact that it was a Y, not an i was a critical plot point in the movie and the joke makes no sense without it!

      --
      It's been a long time.
    17. Re:Misread the title as by Genom · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our...oh nevermind... ;P

    18. Re:Misread the title as by gcatullus · · Score: 1

      Just finished reading Phillip K Dick's "The Great C" and once again science emulates science fiction. The Great C is the last remaining computer after nuclear destruction of the Earth. The few remaining tribes of humans must send a yearly sacrifice to The Great C. The human must ask three questions, if The Great C can't answer, then the human is spared. If the computer does answer the human walks up to a platform and drops into a digestive tank. If a sacrifice isn't sent The Great C will rain down more nuclear destruction. So in the future robots/computers may well eat Humans.

  2. StinkBot 5000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA:
    monitoring of [...] toxic gas concentrations

    I'd say the "toxic gas" sensor may be overwhelmed by the robot's own stench of shit, which is used to attract the flies. With that said, I, for one, welcome our robotic fly-eating overlords...

    1. Re:StinkBot 5000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me see if I get this straight:
      1. Build stinky robot that eats flies
      2. Test for toxic gas
      3. ???
      4. Profit!


      posting anonymously only because I've already moderated this topic, of course

  3. Attractive? by romper · · Score: 4, Funny
    "...it will have to use sewage or excrement to attract the flies and is bound to smell appalling."

    Something tells me it'll fit right in here. =)

    --
    Right is wrong when left is right.
  4. great use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robo-kermit!

  5. They're called, "Flowers" by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Funny

    "One of the great things about flies is that you can get them to come to you," he said. Hence the downside of the fully autonomous robot: it will have to use sewage or excrement to attract the flies and is bound to smell appalling.

    Hello, McFly! I think our photosynthetic brethren figured out the solution to this problem a few gazillion years ago. The answer is flowers!

    It sounds like these researchers are already taking this behemoth as their example. Great: I, for one, welcome our new Giant Corpse Flower overlords. But why not jump forward a few million years? A rose by any other name, you know.

    On the other hand, nobody cares if the robot eats house flies. Butterflies might be another thing altogether. Won't someone please think of the Butterflies?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by Tezkah · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or, use an even better solution and use solar power, since then you dont have to spend hours trying to capture food, all you have to do is sit there!

      Another win for plant-kind!

    2. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by kfg · · Score: 3, Informative

      The answer is flowers!

      Indeed. That may, in fact, be the very inspiration for this device, as flowers that attract flies and digest them smell like. . .shit and rotting meat.

      Go figure.

      KFG

    3. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by Tackhead · · Score: 0
      > "One of the great things about flies is that you can get them to come to you," he said. Hence the downside of the fully autonomous robot: it will have to use sewage or excrement to attract the flies and is bound to smell appalling.
      >
      > Hello, McFly!

      ...you look like you are Scottish, crunchy and taste good with a proton exchange membrane?

    4. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      I remember giving a girl I particularly liked a 4-foot flower, but she did not seem to appreciate it.

      I never really understood why it is traditional to give a girl you like a plant's sexual organs anyways.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    5. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the symbolism should be obvious, and it was a lot better than the old tradition of giving them animal sex organs. If you think roses don't look very good in a vase after a week...

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they use UV to lure the flies, like those fly lamps in the deli?

    7. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by The+Unabageler · · Score: 1

      of course, that would require sunlight, making the robots unsuitable for cleaning out outhouses.

      --
      perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
    8. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by NoMercy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your general flowers will attract wasps, bees and butterflys, when you want to attract the less wholesome type of fly you need there favorite food, so that's shit and rotting carcas smell :)

    9. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd probably take more electricity powering the lamp then you'd get from the fly, although I guess if the area's really infested...

      feces doesnt use any electricity, and it's free last time I checked.

    10. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      I think that flies are attracted to shit and rotting carcasses because it is a place to lay their young, as maggots eat bacteria. I don't know if flies eat any of it themselves.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    11. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by DrLZRDMN · · Score: 1

      The flower you link to is called Amorphophallus titanum, try a litteral translation.

    12. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by luckyguesser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the great things about flies is that you can get them to come to you," he said. Hence the downside of the fully autonomous robot: it will have to use sewage or excrement to attract the flies and is bound to smell appalling.

      Aren't flies also attracted to watermelon? I dunno, just the first thing that came to my mind...
      Mmmm.... watermelon.

      --


      The power of Christ compiles you.
      A Random Blog
    13. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Finally! The Scottish highlands are made habitable by squads of roving robots that feed off midgies. Just replace the smell of sewage with the smell of humans.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    14. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by mlk · · Score: 2, Funny
      Won't someone please think of the Butterflies?

      The robot is, and its thought is *YUM*
      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    15. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There must be some reason frogs aren't photosynthetic.

    16. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      There must be some reason frogs aren't photosynthetic.

      They like to sit in nightclubs in clouds of Gallois smoke.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    17. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, thats black people.

    18. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I've never notice a smell around our Venus Fly-Trap.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    19. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by J.R.+Random · · Score: 1

      Flowers that are pollinated by flies (rather than by bees or butterflies) smell like rotting flesh.

    20. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by kfg · · Score: 1

      The Venus Flytrap does not use its flowers to attract prey, but just as most other flowering plants do to attract pollinators. That's why the Venus Flytrap flowers on the end of a long stalk, to prevent pollinators from being accidentally trapped and "eaten."

      Pitcher plants are another story and they can stink quite revoltingly.

      KFG

    21. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, the symbolism should be obvious, and it was a lot better than the old tradition of giving them animal sex organs. If you think roses don't look very good in a vase after a week...

      Just in case you don't think the poster is serious: he's dead serious.

      Won't somebody think of the children^W butterflies^W raccoons?!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    22. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      The flower you link to is called Amorphophallus titanum, try a litteral translation.

      You mean, a littoral translation? A. Titanum is native to the tropics; I don't think it would do well by the shore.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    23. Re:They're called, "Flowers" by muzthe42nd · · Score: 0

      Actually, they're attracted to the carbon dioxide we breathe out... not the smell of us.

      --
      Pfft - Sorry, what?
  6. Overheard in a remote jungle... by TWX · · Score: 5, Funny


    "Heeeeelllp Meeeeee! Heeeeeellllp Meeee!"

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Overheard in a remote jungle... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      "Heeeeelllp Meeeeee! Heeeeeellllp Meeee!"

      *GULP*

    2. Re:Overheard in a remote jungle... by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      proc options (main);
      /* caps not used due to slashdot bottage */
      put list (" whaz wrong with PL/1?");
      end;

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:Overheard in a remote jungle... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Alright now,

      don't tease David Hedison (The Fly, Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea...)

      David Syes

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  7. Flies by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    The neat part is it's powered by 'catching flies and digesting them in special fuel cells.'"

    Yep, sounds like like elementary school..

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Flies by MC_Cancer_Pants · · Score: 1

      In other news: Florida man creates baby-powered fuel cell.

    2. Re:Flies by eingram · · Score: 1

      NASA should put this on the next rover missions to Mars, or future missions to the Moon! It could eat flies and not have to depend only on solar and battery power! Yeah!

      Wait...

    3. Re:Flies by binux · · Score: 1

      Sounds alimentary to me.

  8. Would that turn into human eating machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To power itself and also to replicate.

    Nice holywood/things go wrong movie.

    1. Re:Would that turn into human eating machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is powered by giving it the green tablets ;)

  9. It's name by Aadain2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are they going to call it Kermit the Bot?

    --
    Space for rent, inquire within
    1. Re:It's name by ksheff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Renfield

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    2. Re:It's name by stupid_is · · Score: 2, Funny
      Or even "Lord of the Flies"

      --
      -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
  10. If they are going into toxic environments by 10000000000000000000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    they need to watch out for the flies that eat robots!

    1. Re:If they are going into toxic environments by iMaple · · Score: 1

      Thats what happens in Soviet Russia. Ofcourse we could have a Beuwolf cluster of such robots ...

    2. Re:If they are going into toxic environments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet russia....

    3. Re:If they are going into toxic environments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... running Knoppix, of course!

    4. Re:If they are going into toxic environments by cHiphead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only in Soviet Russia...

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    5. Re:If they are going into toxic environments by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      flies do eat robots............. in Soviet Russia!

    6. Re:If they are going into toxic environments by goodydot · · Score: 1

      Careful of your button-fly 501s around this guy.

  11. men in hats wins again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flies/trees/whatever. men in hats wins! http://meninhats.com/comics/20040818.gifhttp://men inhats.com/comics/20040818.gif

  12. Now what do I do? by joeldixon66 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So a robot's been created that eats flies while covered in fecal matter, to monitor toxic gas concentrations?

    Just another example of how technology is being used to take job opportunities away from me.

    1. Re:Now what do I do? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Maybe they need an assistant poopsmith on Homestar Runner?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  13. Wait... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Funny

    is a robot that kills and uses living things really all that good of an idea? Sure, flies are annoying and can really ruin a picnic, but someting about arbitrarily deciding that they are not worthy of life somehow seems wrong.

    OK, I lied. I think this is great! Animal rights zealots an fuck off.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Wait... by Chilltowner · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Hmm...what if they want something...larger...taster...filled with more sweet, sweet caloric energy? What if they find an abundant larger animal that sates their new hunger? Let's get down to brass tacks...what if they start eatin' people? Laws of Robotics be damned, they're hungry!

    2. Re:Wait... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if they find an abundant larger animal that sates their new hunger? Let's get down to brass tacks...what if they start eatin' people?

      Duh...That would be a problem.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    3. Re:Wait... by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you really want to make the local insect life happy you can always stand naked at night in a mosquito infested swamp, and/or arrange to have your body left to putrify and rot in a field after you die so the bugs can feast and pupate on your earthly remains. I wonder why PETA isn't suggesting this as a natural alternative to cremation or burial?

      But seriously, if we could ever develop a nano-bug that dines on mosquitoes it would be a great day for mankind. Bye bye malaria!

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    4. Re:Wait... by russx2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, and bye bye to the dragonflies who dine on them. So then we can knock a few breeds of bird off the non-extinct list who find their daily quota of dragon-like flies diminishing. And then of course the algaes around lakes grow out of control killing off the fish.

      Everything has its place in the chain :-)

    5. Re:Wait... by Coming+soon! · · Score: 1

      Yes, and we and our progeny hold our rightful place at the top of the chain...

    6. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who care about what will become of their body once they're dead are complete moron.

    7. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Because there are going to be millions of these things gorging themselves on flies. I think you may have left a few steps out between "prototype" and "robot that smells like shit in every home causing an ecological disaster"

    8. Re:Wait... by yog · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's all worth it. I hate mosquitos. Let's wipe them off the face of the earth. Squish, squish, squish! Ditto for midges, no-see-ums, ticks, biting flies, horseflies, and tapeworms. Let's get rid of wasps and fire ants as well; who the heck needs'em?

      I'd like someone to build a machine that honeypots mosquitos and ticks and destroys them. A pink, flesh-like substance that coats the robot and exudes CO2 and sweat-like vapor, walks on two stump-like legs coated with the same "flesh", and poisons parasites that attack it. Release millions of them every year in forests, wetlands, river banks, etc., and let them gradually suck up all the ticks and crap that infest these areas until they are gone. Of course you'll have to put up with these weird, naked stumps wandering around when you go out hiking, but that's a small price to pay.

      Ah, to be able to lie in the grass again and watch the sun go down without having to be drenched in Deet.

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    9. Re:Wait... by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

      I really fear what the operating environment of a tapeworm-eating robot would be. o.O

      Would that REALLY be worth it? ._.;

    10. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were the chain so fragile it would've broken apart and collapsed long before we got here.

    11. Re:Wait... by Baal+Sebub · · Score: 1
      Bye bye malaria!

      DDT could do this just as well...

      --
      120 chars are not enough for a signature. I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to c
    12. Re:Wait... by Mant · · Score: 1

      So then we can knock a few breeds of bird off the non-extinct list who find their daily quota of dragon-like flies diminishing. And then of course the algaes around lakes grow out of control killing off the fish.

      Hang on, how did you get from birds to algae going out of control? Do those birds also eat the algae? Do the dragonflies? Does nothing else exist in that environment that eats the algae?

      The circle of life is all very warm and fuzzy, but animal become extinct all the time, and others move into their niche. If it wouldn't cause some major disturbance, I'd happily loose dragonflies and some birds if it meant the end of mosquitoes.

    13. Re:Wait... by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Your argument might hold, and I'd agree for almost any other species... but these are MOSQUITOES. They're probably the second most lethal species on the planet, in terms of the deaths they cause by spreading malaria. I don't care what it does to the rest of the food chain, extermiating the mosquito would be the greatest favour anyone has done for humanity since we did for smallpox.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    14. Re:Wait... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Everything has its place in the chain :-)

      Maybe, but not in MY back yard.

      And I don't mean, in my neighborhood, or in my personal space, or anything like that. I actually mean the yard behind the building where I live.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  14. it has to be... by wertarbyte · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I, for one, welcome our new robotic, fly eating overlords.

    --
    Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh.
  15. Space Flight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, if they develop one of these to explore space, would it be a venus flytrap?

    1. Re:Space Flight? by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      No, to get the smell right they'll have to be located on Uranus.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
  16. The Marvin quote by iMaple · · Score: 1, Funny

    How depressed would Marvin be if they modified him and all he would have to do was open doors and eat flies.

    1. Re:The Marvin quote by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget guarding the ship...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
  17. Mmmm, beefy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wait until it figures out what a delicacy human beings are, and how much more power it'll generate.

    A future full of man-eating Zombie Robots? I can dig it. *grabs boomstick*

  18. It's not possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What I want to know is: Can they digest... humans?!

    1. Re:It's not possible. by hplasm · · Score: 0

      This guy better watch out... http://www.badpress.co.uk/humanfly/

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  19. Stargate SG1 by AsbestosRush · · Score: 1

    there was an episode where one of these would have come in really handy.

    --
    EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
    AC's need not reply
    1. Re:Stargate SG1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, no shit. of course, the machine would only need to eat one of those flies to keep going for a while.

  20. The Matrix by SWroclawski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the movie they said we were batteries, but now I know it was just another example of factory farming.

    1. Re:The Matrix by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 4, Funny
      nerd obligation #1: reference to the matrix

      nerd obligation #2: using any means necessary to defend use of #1

      ---
      Get a free iPod, for real. Just Start an AOL trial, get verified (2 weeks), then cancel it!

    2. Re:The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least that wouldn't have violated the laws of thermodynamics.

    3. Re:The Matrix by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you were thinking of The Meatrix? (The pig acts with too much emotion.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:The Matrix by SWroclawski · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I made a The Meatrix post a few months ago- but decided it was too much.

    5. Re:The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a free iPod, for real. Just Start an AOL trial, get verified (2 weeks), then cancel it!

      Mr Neuroelectronic, the reason I disabled sig display is that I was fed up of people pimping free iPods. If you're going to pimp free iPods in your sig, please make it a real sig and not a bit you paste into every post.

    6. Re:The Matrix by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      Actually i didn't paste that, i had typed it... Mr Anonymous. Since its not a sig it is not disabled then?

  21. No need to smell like shit... by Pinkoir · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why not try attracting mosquitos or something. I can't spend 5 minutes outside without 50 or so lunging for my sweet succulent veins. Just get the robot to be warmer than the environment and smell like a sweaty human. Only slightly less offensive than shit I admit but an improvement none-the-less.

    -Pinkoir

    1. Re:No need to smell like shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mosquitos are attracted by CO2 which this thing probably puts out. Still, flies are much juicer than mosquitos, unless the mosquito got to you first.

    2. Re:No need to smell like shit... by kiddygrinder · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, i believe mosquitos are attracted to carbon dioxide.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    3. Re:No need to smell like shit... by Reene · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're attracted to a variety of things, not just carbon dioxide. Certain pheromones and the chemicals we secrete in our sweat attract them just as well if not better than breathing. The reason certain body sprays can work (to an extent) is because they clog pores rather badly. Scientists are still trying to figure out what exactly attracts mosquitos so they can figure out a way to repel them properly.

      This all is also why you tend to get bit more if you're being active outdoors, because you're not only sweating more, you're breathing more too.

      Maybe when they get farther in figuring out what exactly attracts mosquitos the most they can make a robot that eats mosquitos as well as flies. Until then, I'm perfectly content with there being a few less flies buzzing around (hey, it's not like it's difficult for them to reproduce, just slap a rotting carcass on the ground somewhere).

      --
      "He does look a bit Oompa like, even if his Loompa is a bit off-kilter."
    4. Re:No need to smell like shit... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Mossies love the color blue, so make sure you have no blue around your self, but place a blue light in the area you want them to be decoyed to, ie corner of the garden or away from where you want them to be.

      This is why hotels which have 'blue' pools are stupid in tropical areas, it should be greenish, yes not as pretty but no mossies.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    5. Re:No need to smell like shit... by ntb · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why smell? A uv lamp cand atract insects (like the UV insect killers) and for long periods Electricity is easier to generate than smell.

  22. Toxic areas? by Jaza · · Score: 1

    The robots can perform "military monitoring of, say, temperature or toxic gas concentrations". But if there's toxic gas around, there would be no flies, cause they'd all be dead!

    Maybe it can just inhale the toxic air, and get high on that, and that will keep it going for long enough - until it returns to an area with a higher concentration of flies per capita.

  23. Hm by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the firmware is open-sourced, someone could make a version which preys on SCO executives...

    1. Re:Hm by tool462 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just have the robot's tongue look like a check for $699 made out to "cash" and they'll walk right in :)

    2. Re:Hm by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the firmware is open-sourced, someone could make a version which preys on SCO executives...

      If the firmware is open-sourced, it will already attract SCO executives.

      I can see the headlines already, "SCO sues robotic fly-eating overlords"

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    3. Re:Hm by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Geez... Slashdot, the only place where a stupid lame joke is moderated "5, Funny", if it is about SCO =) Not that I mind.

    4. Re:Hm by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Excellent - I like the way you guys have chosen to keep all the hackneyed Slashdot jokes in a single thread.

    5. Re:Hm by RsG · · Score: 1

      Well, we haven't got to Soviet Russia yet...

      Here let me: In Soviet Russia, robot flies prey on YOU!

      Now somebody find a way to incorporate hot grits! ;-)

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    6. Re:Hm by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Well, we haven't got to Soviet Russia yet...

      And we would have been perfectly fine without going there, you insensitive clod!

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  24. Flies by Ghostgate · · Score: 1, Funny

    it's powered by 'catching flies and digesting them in special fuel cells.'"

    Just don't tell PETA.

  25. An Ecoligical Disaster by krygny · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the delicate balance of the world's fly population is upset, dog shit production in my back yard will be out of control.

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    1. Re:An Ecoligical Disaster by yojimbo311 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, flys have got to be near the bottom of the food chain. By introducing an unkillable fly gobbling monster into any hazardous, and therefore delicate, ecosystem the consequences could be dire! Flyswatter manufactures may become bankrupt, we lose that satisfying ZAP sound during the summer, cats will have to start playing with yarn again. It's too bad this thing isn't going after mosquitos...

    2. Re:An Ecoligical Disaster by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1

      You can restore the balance by not feeding your dog.

  26. Where will it end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First the robots ate the flies and I did not complain because I don't like flies. Then the robots ate the dolphins, and I didn't complain because I'm not a crybaby treehugger. Then the robots ate me and I'm trapped in a bad trilogy of movies.

  27. Is this at all useful by iMaple · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Juast wondering if this is just some knifd of publicity stunt. I mean can flies really provide sufficient power for a robot to function properly (move around). I mean would'nt it need to be super effecient.Instead why not make a special recharging which periodically goes out into the hazardous env to charge the robots.
    Of course the original is a really cool toy if you need an automated fly swatter.

    1. Re:Is this at all useful by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      In short, yes. Anything that provides power without requiring the robot to move around or otherwise expend energy will provide it with sufficient power to move (think batteries). Although I suspect solar power would be better for most enviromnments the robot might go in. On the other hand, I fully support alternative power sources for robots, no matter how much they might stink.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Is this at all useful by bozoman42 · · Score: 1

      I think the original poster is more concerned that the process of digesting the flies will require more energy to perform than the energy produced.

  28. Re:They're called, "Frogs" by turnstyle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I say the robot should catch the flies, and then use them to lure frogs. Imagine the power.

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
  29. great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now can we please have a model that eats wives?

    1. Re:Great by rubberbando · · Score: 1

      No, that was the Matrix that used humans for power. Not the Terminator. :)

      --
      DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    2. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >now can we please have a model that eats wives?

      But that would put me out of a job. I ate your wife this afternoon (while you were at work). Then she "accepted a delivery via the tradesman's entrance" http://www.utterpants.co.uk/news/analscourge.html

  30. Gastrobots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Robots that have biotic stomachs are sometimes called 'Gastrobots'. There is a paper from MIT on the subject. Another paper from some guy at USF has this choice quote:

    Few robotics engineers would disagree that robot development has often been inspired by biological examples (Beer et al., 1997)

    This is not a unique insight but it is funny if you misread it as "biological examples, e.g. Beer".

    1. Re:Gastrobots by bubbaprog · · Score: 1

      Dr. Wilkinson's Gastrobot Chew Chew is really quite the technological marvel. What's funny is even he admits the dangers of introducing such a machine to the world. Of course, he also explains the machine could be used to scare off sharks (feeding on smaller fish) or pick oranges and other agricultural items...

    2. Re:Gastrobots by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Great. Once we have a robots that sits around on his sofa all day, watching TV, drinking beer and eating junk-food... 90% of the planet's male population will become obsolete!

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  31. Lets just use the consuming part of the robot by mrmaster · · Score: 1

    I would like to see the part that actually does the consuming put out in all the mosquito infested areas. Free power!

    1. Re:Lets just use the consuming part of the robot by Martix · · Score: 1

      Thats not a bad idea i can surf the web.
      post on /. by the fire on my wi fi lap top and get rid of the mosquitos ect at the same time.

  32. It can't just be me by JayBlalock · · Score: 4, Funny
    SURELY these scientists have seen enough movies to realize that making a farking CARNIVOROUS robot is a bad, bad, BAD idea.

    Not to mention, making it "release and forget?" Yay! Invincible autonomous robot predators! WHEEEE!

    To quoth Jeff Goldblum: This is the worst idea in a long, sad history of bad ideas.

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    1. Re:It can't just be me by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I'll take a dozen just to keep flies out of our house and porch this time of year.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    2. Re:It can't just be me by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      SURELY these scientists have seen enough movies to realize that making a farking CARNIVOROUS robot is a bad, bad, BAD idea.

      How about a robot that eats fish? Now we just need to tweek a few settings, and it might be able to catch even bigger "fish"

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    3. Re:It can't just be me by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      So you're afraid that invincible autonomous robot predators might still have a few bugs? Wuss!

      To quoth Jeff Goldblum: "Why is there a watermelon there?"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:It can't just be me by fatman22 · · Score: 1

      Never give up control of the ON/OFF switch.

      Dr. Charles Forbin - 1970

    5. Re:It can't just be me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To quoth Jeff Goldblum: This is the worst idea in a long, sad history of bad ideas.

      Yes, but consider the source! Of course Jeff Goldblum is going to be against this type of thing - he's THE FLY!

    6. Re:It can't just be me by Jimi1337 · · Score: 1

      "To quoth Jeff Goldblum: This is the worst idea in a long, sad history of bad ideas." To 'quoth' Goldblum once again: "God creates flies. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates robots. Robots eat flies (and man) -- machines inherit the Earth." -John Hancock

  33. Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We have a robot that can fail because there aren't enough bugs in the system?

    1. Re:Hmmmm by Negaiss · · Score: 3, Funny

      actually you are free to digest flies then use the sugars in their bodies to generate energy and monitor toxic environments too

    2. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, frogs are much better! I bet you the robot can't even cross a four lane highway (without being run over) and then jump from log to log trying to cross a river to find that damn fly!

    3. Re:Hmmmm by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      we must be in Soviet Russia!

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  34. Animal Rights by neon-fx · · Score: 1

    Just wait till the animal rights activists get their hands on this news. Im sure at some point in the not to distant future Im going to be stopped walking down the road by someone wanting me to sign up to a "flys not fuel" campaign.

  35. Too many potential jokes... by chill · · Score: 1

    Almost overwhelming!

    The first thing that popped into mind was "but can it catch the flies using a pair of chopsticks?"

    Followed by "that would have to be one hell of a lot of flies!"

    Then "what happens when it starts moving up the food chain and realized humans provide more enery and are easier to catch?"

    Exactly how much tequila to you have to drink to come up with ideas like this?

    "Hey! I got it! A fly eating, shit smelling robot! And I've even got an angle to sell it to the military! Barkeep? Another round!"

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Too many potential jokes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad none of them are remotely funny.

  36. where's that fuel cell by ElectricRook · · Score: 1
    If the fuel cell can turn flies into electricty, why not just feed the fuel cell refined sugar? 2.2kg is ~ US$1.50. How much energy is that compared to maybe catching bugs?

    I smell BS.

    --
    - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    1. Re:where's that fuel cell by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Not autonomous is the problem- you're solving the wrong problem. The problem isn't HOW DO WE GENERATE ELECTRICITY, it's HOW DO WE GET THE FUEL TO THE ROBOT WHEN WE NO LONGER KNOW OR CARE WHERE THE ROBOT IS.

      My question is just how much sugar is in the skeleton of a insect that only has an exoskeleton to begin with....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:where's that fuel cell by iroll · · Score: 1

      I suppose the response to this is "we save having to carry as much stored fuel onboard, and it can refuel itself in the field indefinitely."

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    3. Re:where's that fuel cell by tmbg37 · · Score: 1

      That would be fine, but I think the point of this is being able to refuel on its own. What good is sugar for fuel when the bot is 10 miles away in a jungle or something?

      --
      This comment was thought up very late at night and does not necessarily reflect my views at a more reasonable hour.
    4. Re:where's that fuel cell by mlk · · Score: 1

      It could raid Walmarts, Starbucks and Maccy Ds, you are never more than 6 feet to one of the three.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  37. Let us not forget phase I: by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    See Intelligent Autonomous Systems Laboratory for more information.

    Slugbot, Ecobot... oddly enough I don't see a link to Ecobot II on there.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Let us not forget phase I: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here you go: link. Even has a photo.

    2. Re:Let us not forget phase I: by bozoman42 · · Score: 1

      Why isn't this called the Systems Laboratory for Autonomous Intelligent Robots? Then it would be about SLAIR's!

  38. seems like... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...in warfare they might do this. Maybe some of their vehicles would/could run on wasted people and parts, which you can accumulate in piles in said war.

    1. Re:seems like... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Commander, yesterday, we picked up 3000 bodies.

      "Ok, we have enough fuel for the next phase of the offensive. load up"

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    2. Re:seems like... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      No no no. The sequence have to go... Robot eat

      flies

      dirt

      shit

      corpse

      human

      other robot

    3. Re:seems like... by Trent05 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they run out of dirt, we're all in trouble.

      --


      --
      The Marines: The few, the proud, the not very bright. - Slashdot tagline 04/21/05
    4. Re:seems like... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would allow the US Army to reclassify Firendly Fire as "adaptively refilling our fuel reserves".

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:seems like... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Commander, yesterday, we picked up 3000 bodies.

      Wait until Pamela Anderson and PITA find out about this. There will be hell to pay I tell you! Oh the humanity! Why must we torture innocent flies to further our own domination of the animal kingdom! Have you no shame!

      Of course on the more serious note does anybody else think this will be worthless? Are you going to find that many flies in areas of "temperature or toxic gas concentrations"?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:seems like... by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, that's got to be against the Geneva Convention!!

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    7. Re:seems like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That just means the only the US can use it.

  39. Would be nice to power cars. by DocSnyder · · Score: 2, Funny

    My car is already catching a lot of flies, especially during night trips. Attaching a "fly generator" to the front would save much fuel.

    1. Re:Would be nice to power cars. by Zardoz44 · · Score: 1
      My thoughts exactly. Get the transport-truck business into this. They could save a fortune on fuel costs just by driving through the woods at night. Maybe they could add a roadkill-scraper while they're at it. Why stop at flies? Then we could have "Christine", the carnivorous transport truck.

      How about a fly-powered bug zapper too? Could it catch enough flies to power itself? Who knows, but we'll have fun trying.

  40. Ron Popeil ripoff by donutz · · Score: 1

    "Called EcoBot II, the robot is part of a drive to make "release and forget" robots

    Soon to be sued by RonCo for infringing on their "set it and forget it" trademark.

    1. Re:Ron Popeil ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      didnt you get the post card that read dont "set it and forget it"? it seems they had some fires.

  41. One at home by dgagley · · Score: 1

    I need one at my house. It can clean the house protect the family and can use the leftovers and that I would compost to regenerate itself. COOL.

    "Hey where did the cat go....oops I forgot to feed Robbie the Robot."

    --
    I can't use my sig - my computer can't read my handwriting.
  42. Great by CrazyMalaysian · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know, the whole terminator reality will come true, and they'll be eating humans for power!

  43. Killing Robots by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Today it's flies. Tomorrow, wasps. Then, as robots grow more power hungry, WASPs. And soon, it will be your turn. Robots will grow us like plants, as seen in the Matrix!

    But seriously, I don't like this. Just because some animals are too weak to defend themselves, doesn't give us the right to kill them. Nor does it give us the right to build a robot that kills them. It's not like that robot couldn't be powered by other means.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Killing Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out of here you tree hugging hippie!

    2. Re:Killing Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just follow that locig a little farther...

      We don't have the rights to kill animals...
      We don't have the rights to kill plants...

      Oops, I just killed some tiny single-celled organism by breathing!

      Oh no; I'm no longer sick. I must have killed the virus/bacteria trying to kill me!

      I should just kill myself and get it over with.
      .
      .
      .
      Do I have the rights to do that?

      --
      Please realize that rights are the sole domain of humans.

    3. Re:Killing Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Logic doesn't work on hippies...

    4. Re:Killing Robots by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would you have any objection to an animal being killed by another animal in order to stay alive?

      Humans are just very intelligent animals, and the fly-eating robot is just a (very abstracted) result of our drive to stay alive.

    5. Re:Killing Robots by penguinoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get out of here you tree hugging hippie!

      Actually, he's a fly hugging hippie.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    6. Re:Killing Robots by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      Who cares, people kill billions of flies every day. Why not get some return on it?

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    7. Re:Killing Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good one! ...oh to have moderator points...

    8. Re:Killing Robots by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't drive a car. The average person probably kills a dozen or so flies on the way to work. In the South during lovebug season, its probably more like a few hundred insects massacred per trip.

    9. Re:Killing Robots by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, you don't have the right to kill yourself. Doing so would harm any parasites and bacteria living in/on you.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    10. Re:Killing Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The way I see it we shouldn't be causing harm or suffering without good reason. It is quite possible that flies feel phsyical pain in a way not dissimilar to humans. It is all too easy to believe that they are an inferior being not worthy of compassion, but if they do feel pain and suffering I think they are deserving of our compassion just as a dog is.

      I agree that just living will cause all sort of small organisms to die without us ever intentially causing this, but I do believe it is justified. However killing these flies is both intential and seemingly without a well justified reason.

      If any of you people are really thinkers I would urge you consider why you don't torture dogs or other small mammals. If it is to do with empathy and the fact that these small mammals are seemingly capable of experiencing severe suffering and pain, consider that even flies may be capable of not too dissimilar sensations.

    11. Re:Killing Robots by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      Wont kill plants, wont kill animals.

      I'm very curious. Just what do you eat?

    12. Re:Killing Robots by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      Maybe just fast-food. Most of it is completely synthetic anyway, as we all know.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    13. Re:Killing Robots by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 1

      Wont kill plants, wont kill animals.

      I'm very curious. Just what do you eat?

      Although I am not one, check out fruitarians...

      -- Pete.

    14. Re:Killing Robots by camzacid · · Score: 1

      Well its obvious you have dont live here in Australia the real problem with this is how can we MASS produce this suckers at a good price.

    15. Re:Killing Robots by Mant · · Score: 1

      Wow, I can't beleive such tripe got modded as insightful.

      Just because some animals are too weak to defend themselves, doesn't give us the right to kill them.

      I don't know what planet you have been living on, but that is pretty much how nature works around here. Animals eat other animals, unless the intended prey can defend itself, run away, or evolve into something not good to eat (e.g. poisonus).

      Lets face it, removing a few flies won't endanger the species, so do you really care about the "right" to life of a few flies? Do you go around scolding spiders? If in insect lands on you and start sucking you blood, would you leave it?

      Nor does it give us the right to build a robot that kills them. It's not like that robot couldn't be powered by other means.

      It could, but if you are worried about the environment, flies are a renewable energy source and probably better for it than charging up from the mains that ultimately comes from oil, coal or nuclear power. Only solar would be a better option, and that isn't always viable.

      "Rights" are arbitary ideas humans beings have come up with on how we treat each other, and sometimes other creatures, and how we think the would should be. I never heard any serious argument or seen it comonly held as a view humans don't have the right to kill insects when it suits us. Sure, not pull wings off flies for fun, but look at the amount of stuff sold to kill of bugs that bother us. Some people may worry about the larger effects of losing a whole insect species, but nobody (apart from you) cares about a few bugs.

    16. Re:Killing Robots by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Wont kill plants, wont kill animals.
      I'm very curious. Just what do you eat?


      Roadkill is acceptable.

    17. Re:Killing Robots by flynns · · Score: 1

      Just because some animals are too weak to defend themselves, doesn't give us the right to kill them. Nor does it give us the right to build a robot that kills them.

      Yes, it does.

      Didn't you ever read Darwin?

      --
      'If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit.'
    18. Re:Killing Robots by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      The way I see it we shouldn't be causing harm or suffering without good reason.

      Powering autonomous robots sounds like a good reason to me.

      If any of you people are really thinkers I would urge you consider why you don't torture dogs or other small mammals. If it is to do with empathy and the fact that these small mammals are seemingly capable of experiencing severe suffering and pain, consider that even flies may be capable of not too dissimilar sensations.

      Nothing whatever to do with empathy. I don't torture dogs or other small mammals because I have no reason to torture them; I'm not a sadist, my ~/.pr0n directory notwithstanding. If I did have a reason - say, scientific research - whose benefits exceeded the potential social stigma incurred, I'd do it.

      I guess from your post that you're a vegan. Well... I'm not. I eat meat and enjoy it, and I eat meat because I enjoy it. Many animals die to power me, and they die needlessly - I could live on only plants if I wanted, but I choose to eat meat for my own pleasure. The pleasure of a good dinner is, to me, sufficient reason for a cow to die. Powering a robot is, to me, a perfectly sufficient reason for flies to die in vast numbers.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    19. Re:Killing Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meinguoid, I am the AC you were replying to. I am impressed with your clear headed answer, you have seemingly sound reasons and understandings of why you do what you do - quite different it seems to most people on this subject.

      I too kill and harm life of one form of another because I deem it to be justified. I'm actually a vegetarian and I suppose many insects and rodents are killed during the production and harvesting of vegetables and fruits. I also kill many small forms of life unintentially during everyday life. I suppose we differ on what is a sufficient reason.

      I don't believe this robot is a sufficient reason to go around intentially killing flies. It also depends on how they are killed too, I doubt flies have an udnerstanding of mortality, therefore an instantaneous painless kill would not be as much a problem with me, but it probably isn't such a refined killing process.

      Studies have shown that insects do have a negative reponse to stimuli such as electric shocks and that the experience appears to be stored in memory and the experience avoided in the future. This seems to suggest that insects may feel pain. From a survival point of view it seems that pain would be a poential evolutionary advantage to any life that could then take measures to avoid that pain - such as by flying away from the source of pain. Pain signifies danger to the organism and thus danger to the ongoing survival of the genetic lineage.

      Do you possess empathy for humans? Do you have a reason for that empathy? To me empathy is the basic trait of understanding and caring for the pain of other beings. Therefore, to me, on principle, any being capable of suffering is worthy of empathy and compassion and flies may very well have the physiological structures necessary to experience suffering.

    20. Re:Killing Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are my hero.

    21. Re:Killing Robots by SilkBD · · Score: 1

      I'm going to ignore your limited point of view rant on killing animals and focus on your Matrix statement.

      To grow a human would require the robot to feed the human... it doesn't make sense, the robot might as well feed itself what it's feeding the human if it's going to eat it.

      --
      00101010
    22. Re:Killing Robots by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      Stop defending the bugs. We killed them before this was made. Now, we've just found a way to kill a lot of them without much effort.

    23. Re:Killing Robots by Mant · · Score: 1

      I don't believe this robot is a sufficient reason to go around intentially killing flies.

      Most (the vast majority) people will happily swat and insect for just bothering them a bit and fly near them. The standard of "sufficiant reason" to kill a fly seems very, very low.

      Studies have shown that insects do have a negative reponse to stimuli such as electric shocks and that the experience appears to be stored in memory and the experience avoided in the future.

      Yep, stimulus-response is one of the basics of living creatures.

      This seems to suggest that insects may feel pain.

      Here is where it gets tricky, as pain is a subjective thing. Humans interpret certain stimulus as pain, but this happens inside the brain, as it interprets the signals from the nerves. We then react to that pain, both on and imediate, instinctive level, and on a longer term, using our intelligence to avoid it level.

      What we have no idea is how the (comparatively) primative insect brain interperts a stimulus we convert to pain. Pain in and of itself is not an evolutionary advantage, it is a means to an end of avoiding physical damage, which is the advantage.

      Even if a fly brain recieves a the input from something that does damage and avoids it in the future, it doesn't mean it feels pain. We relate pain to concepts like discomfort and distress. Can an insect feel such things? Do they feel nothing, or somthing so different we cannot identify it?

      The problem is, we can't actually empathise with animals. We may feel sympathy for them, but we can't feel empathy for them, because we cannot actually know what they think, what it is like to be them. We can manage a sort of pseudo-empathy by projecting human emotions onto them, and end up empathising with what a human in that situation might feel.

      For higher mammals this isn't to bad, we do have some things still in commmon, we can recognise some responses (like pain) as being close to ours, and assume that something kinda similar is going on in their heads. Its good enough "fake empathy" to lets us domesticate, train and live with them. We never really know what goes on in their heads, but it's good enough to work with.

      Things like insects though are just too alien, I doubt we will ever know what they feel or think. Is it twitching in pain, or just twitching?

      Do you possess empathy for humans? Do you have a reason for that empathy?

      Empathy is an evolved survival trait. For communal animals like humans, the ability to empathise helps you predict what other humans are going to do increasing your chance of survival. You can both cooperate and compete better.

      We often think of empathy as somthing warm and fuzzy, but the reason for it is it is just another leg up in passing on our DNA.

      Well, that was a long post that wasn't really agreeing or disagreeing with you. Personally, I'm more than happy that powering a robot is sufficient justifaction for killing flies.

    24. Re:Killing Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mant - this the AC you replied to. You have made some very valid points here for sure.

      I agree that outwardly observable reactions to physically damaging stimuli, which may appear to suggest pain, do not necessary mean that a subjective feeling of what I label "pain" is also occuring.

      Of course I cannot be absolutely certain that even other humans actually interpret pain the same as I do, or for that matter that they are even conscious.....but that is probably getting a bit too low level(or is that high level?) philosopical for now.

      All empathy(whether for humans or animals) is a form of projection or imagining. Unless one could experience the consciousness of another being directly one would have to take a guess at what is, or could be going on inside anothers mind/body.

      I once read an article on the web(can't seem to track it down right now, and this desciprtion of the article is sketchy at best) that certain hormones and/or neurochemicals as well as certain neurological structures and/or receptors that appear to be related to pain perception in humans were also found in animals right down to level of insects. Of course at the current relatively primitive level of scientific understanding of the brain, let alone consciousness, such studies leave a lot to be desired.

      Here's is a link to an article about many of the points you brought up:
      http://www.veganoutreach.org/insectcog.html

      It's definitely a complex issue with many uncertainties. The line where empathy and compassion is relevant and where it may not be relevant is an ongoing issue as far as I am concerned.

    25. Re:Killing Robots by jackrd · · Score: 1

      Do you go around scolding spiders? If in insect lands on you and start sucking you blood, would you leave it?

      For the record, I usually try to get the insects to go outside by putting them in some sort of container. If a mosquito starts sucking my blood, I usually let it finish - that's one mosquito that won't be biting me again. I mean, it already bit me otherwise I wouldn't have noticed it, so I'm basically trading ~30 seconds of it drinking my blood for no more bites from that mosquito. Now, OTOH, it's probably going to go feed some more mosquitos that may or may not come back and bite me, so it's a bit of a toss-up. In both circumstances, though, it depends on my patience and the cooperation of the insect. I'm not going to kill bugs if it's easy not to, but if they won't leave and they're being really annoying; squash.

      Only solar would be a better option, and that isn't always viable.

      Of course, they could also make a vegetarian robot. I don't know if that's feasible, but if it is, why not? I think they should go for the least disruptive technology available; if that's insects, then so be it. But that shouldn't stop them from researching other ways to power the robots that involve less killing.

    26. Re:Killing Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez. I kill flies just because they come into my house. I think powering a robot with the nasty creatures is at least doing something constructive with their carcasses. Maybe one day we can take all the fly carcasses from our windowseals and place them into a container to produce the heat to make our coffee in the mornings ;) I am all for this technology... maybe they'll figure out a way to power things from vegans too?

    27. Re:Killing Robots by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1


      I think it's ok to kill flies to power a machine, but only in small numbers. If you kill too many flies, I for one will be happy, but all the animals in the ecosystem that depend on eating flies will suffer because of a reduced food supply.

      If it weren't for animals that depended on annoying insects, I'd say kill em all, but since the ecosystem depends on them, well we have to be careful.

  44. What's next???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First they eat flies, next they will eat old people's medicine and eventually just feed on senior citizens. Better get your robot insurance asap!! http://www.robotcombat.com/video_oldglory_hi.html/

  45. I'm waiting for the RonCo ads now by ElForesto · · Score: 1

    I can see it already. "Plug in this miracle of a bug-zapper outside your home and it will generate power while it clears away those annoying pests!" Seriously, though, that would be a kinda cool gadget to have around. Maybe they could also branch out into ant and roach traps. Pest control AND micropower in one convenient device.

    Geeze. I can't figure out if I'm being silly or serious now.

    --
    There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
  46. uberfrog by ktulus+cry · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is no big deal at all. Like none of us have ever strapped a model rocket engine and a disposable camera to a frog before. Well... maybe that was just me...

    1. Re:uberfrog by canavan · · Score: 1

      Could yuou please tell me what the frog is doing in there? Is he just ballast or did you train him to take the pictures at perigee?

  47. Park it... by triffidsting · · Score: 1

    ... on a dairy farm - the entire place could be powered by a single generator.

    --
    Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
  48. Flies have been used before by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Where I'm from, on the shores of Lough Neagh, there are a gazzilion flies out in the air every night. They look like columns of smoke, so thick is the sky with them. Well a long time ago, an enterprising farmer laid very fine fishing nets down on the fields by the Lough shore. The flies that died and landed on them were all gathered up and used as fertiliser. His fields that year yeilded 50% more hay than normal. So there you go.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Flies have been used before by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      The difference here is that those flies were used for fertilizer (nitrogen) rather than power generation. Using flies for their nitrogen content has been used for a very, very long time -- think pitcher plants and Venus' fly trap.

      Also, for the dirty mind in all of us, and as proof that biologists do have a sense of humor, the Venus' flytrap was named in reference to a certain very important part of the female anatomy.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    2. Re:Flies have been used before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well a long time ago, an enterprising farmer laid very fine fishing nets down on the fields by the Lough shore. The flies that died and landed on them were all gathered up and used as fertiliser. His fields that year yeilded 50% more hay than normal. So there you go."

      Maybe it was sunny that year?

    3. Re:Flies have been used before by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      No sunnier than usual.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  49. great scott marty ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Marty: "Are you telling me this sucker is nuclear?"

    Doc: "No keep rolling, this sucker is electrical but I need the reaction to generate the 1.21 jigawatts I need"

  50. PETI not PETA by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    PETI not PETA, insects not animals

    1. Re:PETI not PETA by Ghostgate · · Score: 1

      But... insects ARE animals! But just ask PETA. They make a fuss over silkworms used in the silk industries, claiming silk production causes the insects a painful death. The original comment was meant as a joke, but to be honest, they'll probably make a fuss over this too.

    2. Re:PETI not PETA by mothz · · Score: 1

      Insects are animals, just as broccoli is a vegetable. Although I wouldn't put it past PETA to have a separate branch each for Ethical Treatment of {Mammals|Fish|Insects|Reptiles|etc.}

    3. Re:PETI not PETA by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Yep. They also don't eat honey because it is produced by bees.

    4. Re:PETI not PETA by bl4ckmage · · Score: 1

      Or as my high school health teacher told me: "insects aren't animals, they're bugs!" He then proceeded to defend that position for an hour, despite a biology book's proof to the contrary.

    5. Re:PETI not PETA by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Wake me up when they've gotten to the Ethical Treatment of Lint.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  51. So lemme get this straight.... by DreadPir8Lafitte · · Score: 1
    We now have robots that basically 'eat' organic material, and convert it into energy on which to operate?

    So how long will it be before someone decides to make one that eats bigger animals, like humans, maybe?

    Or maybe we could just make robots with AI that can decide to do that for themselves.

    Oh, wait...

  52. A Poll? by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    "...it will have to use sewage or excrement to attract the flies and is bound to smell appalling."

    Something tells me it'll fit right in here. =)

    Fly Topping?

    WD40

    3-in-1

    Marvel Mystery Oil

    STP Oil Treatment

    Liquid Wrench

    10w30

    Ehylene Glycol

    Missing option: I eat my flies straight up, you insensitive clod!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:A Poll? by rk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Makes me glad we don't have the CowboyNeal options anymore.

    2. Re:A Poll? by maeka · · Score: 4, Funny

      I only use Mom's Old Fashioned Robot Oil you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:A Poll? by Fishstick · · Score: 1
      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    4. Re:A Poll? by Blublu · · Score: 1

      "Missing option: I eat my flies straight up, you insensitive clod!"

      More like:
      I don't have a mouth, you insensitive clod!

      --
      meh
  53. Hmmmm by TheMeuge · · Score: 5, Funny

    A machine that can digest flies, then use the sugars in their bodies to generate energy! How ingenious. Oh, wait - it's called a FROG.

  54. I need one of these. by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 1

    I could power my whole house by putting one of these in my bathroom and opening the window to let flies into the house.

  55. Egad! by changa · · Score: 1

    Does this mean in the future we will have robots that will digest humans???

    And you thought the movie Hardware was bad!

  56. Bender? by canadacow · · Score: 3, Funny

    So how long will it be before we have robots that run on beer?

  57. Next robot... by Forbman · · Score: 1

    ...will digest small children who venture forth too far from their parents.

    "Come heeeere, leetle girl! Do you want some candy?" ...but wasn't that kind of the plot line of Pinocchio?

  58. Fly swatters by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    I want one of these new-fangled fly swatters!

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Fly swatters by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      I think the part about "uses sewage or excrement to attract flies" kinda rules out home use.

      On the plus side, this will also dissuade enemies from trying to explode them...

  59. Re:BENEDICT ARNOLDS OF THE OPEN SOURCE MOVEMENT by name773 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What do you have to look forward to?
    some excellent programming :)

  60. I wonder if it could eat other bugs.... by rubberbando · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If they made one that ate mosquitos, they'd make a fortune cashing in on the annual West Nile Disease scare. :)

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  61. I'm so worried! by Deorus · · Score: 1

    What about frogs?

    1. Re:I'm so worried! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, they'll probably drop their guns and surrender to the first 'bot they see.

  62. Robot Eats, Flies to Generate Power by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 4, Funny
    There was a little robot who swallowed a fly.
    I don't know why she swallowed a fly.
    I guess she'll fry.

    There was a little robot who swallowed a spider
    That wiggled and jiggled and tickled insider her.
    She swallowed the spider to catch the fly.
    I don't know why she swallowed a fly.
    I guess she'll fry.

    There was a little robot who swallowed a bird.
    How absurd! To swallow a bird!
    She swallowed the bird to catch the spider
    That wiggled and jiggled and tickled insider her.
    She swallowed the spider to catch the fly.
    I don't know why she swallowed a fly.
    I guess she'll fry.

    There was a little robot who swallowed a cat.
    Imagine that! She swallowed a cat.
    She swallowed the cat to catch the bird.
    She swallowed the bird to catch the spider
    That wiggled and jiggled and tickled insider her.
    She swallowed the spider to catch the fly.
    I don't know why she swallowed a fly.
    I guess she'll fry.

    There was a little robot who swallowed a cat.
    Imagine that! She swallowed a cat.
    She swallowed the cat to catch the bird.
    She swallowed the bird to catch the spider
    That wiggled and jiggled and tickled insider her.
    She swallowed the spider to catch the fly.
    I don't know why she swallowed a fly.
    I guess she'll fry.

    There was a little robot who swallowed a dog.
    What a hog! She swallowed a dog.
    She swallowed the dog to catch the cat.
    She swallowed the cat to catch the bird.
    She swallowed the bird to catch the spider
    That wiggled and jiggled and tickled insider her.
    She swallowed the spider to catch the fly.
    I don't know why she swallowed a fly.
    I guess she'll fry.

    There was a little robot who swallowed a goat.
    She opened her throat and in walked a goat.
    She swallowed the goat to catch the dog.
    She swallowed the dog to catch the cat.
    She swallowed the cat to catch the bird.
    She swallowed the bird to catch the spider
    That wiggled and jiggled and tickled insider her.
    She swallowed the spider to catch the fly.
    I don't know why she swallowed a fly.
    I guess she'll fry.

    There was a little robot who swallowed a cow.
    I don't know how she swallowed that cow.
    She swallowed the cow to catch the goat.
    She swallowed the goat to catch the dog.
    She swallowed the dog to catch the cat.
    She swallowed the cat to catch the bird.
    She swallowed the bird to catch the spider
    That wiggled and jiggled and tickled inside her.
    She swallowed the spider to catch the fly.
    I don't know why she swallowed a fly.
    I guess she'll fry.

    There was a little robot, she swallowed a horse.
    She fried, of course.

    (whew)
    Why does the lameness filter care how many characters per line a post contains? Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted. Why does the lameness filter care how many characters per line a post contains? Why does the lameness filter care how many characters per line a post contains? Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted. Why does the lameness filter care how many characters per line a post contains? Why does the lameness filter care how many characters per line a post contains? Why does the lameness filter care how many characters per line a post contains? Why does the lameness filter care how many characters per line a post contains? Why does the lameness filter care how many characters per line a post contains?
    1. Re:Robot Eats, Flies to Generate Power by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      Although the lameness filter is generally useless and annoying...I have to admit, it pretty accurately flagged that post. That was truly lame. :D

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  63. matrix by hikerhat · · Score: 1

    Hah. And you all scoffed at using humans for power in the Matrix. If a fly can power a robot certainly humans can power computers. In fact, I'm going to prove it. Just need to find something with a smell that attracts humans... Ah, beer should do it.

  64. what flies by dindi · · Score: 1

    hmm I wonder what kind of fly can survive gas/heat/radiation ....

    sure some do (eg scorpions take radiation well)
    but still made me think for a sec

  65. Or FUD by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    If the firmware is open-sourced, someone could make a version which preys on SCO executives...

    Or FUD

    "The giant robot is approaching the Redmond, Washington, leaving a path of destruction. Fighter aircraft have fired missiles at the FUD-Bot, but it seems to grown in strength the closer it gets to this community. Meanwhile in other news, Microsoft is pointing to another independent study bashing TCO, reliability, security and suport for Linux and Open Source..."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  66. So? by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

    What's so special about this? I do it all the time.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  67. finally... by spirit_fingers · · Score: 0

    Mr. Fusion has arrived!

  68. Now for the headlines... by eamonman · · Score: 1

    Bug eating robots invented. All Windows machines are now in danger.

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
  69. Crap.. by PeaceTank · · Score: 1

    This is cool, but if there ever is a robot revolution this gives them the technology to develop giant human digesting robots. It'd be like the matrix but not. I'd personally rather be in a tube and think I'm alive than be digeted for power. That's just me though.

    *cue matrix argument

  70. Project Home Page by Nintendork · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Intelligent Autonomous Systems Laboratory at University of the West of England is where this robot is being developed. Here's a link to their homepage. They have a projects section that has more information.

    -Lucas

  71. Load with MS software by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    and you'll be able to power it with /. hate mail.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  72. Web of Stench by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    "...it will have to use sewage or excrement to attract the flies and is bound to smell appalling."

    Why do you think they call it a core dump, anyway?


    Anyway, this is one step closer to the Matrix. Instead of using humans as batteries, they'll just eat us.

    BEWARE THE WORLD WIDE WEB!
    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  73. Que Matrix inspired tin foil beanie by funkdid · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    My fiance is a teacher specializing in early childhood developement. It's amazing how closly technology mirrors the human body. For example many human developmental disorders have computers equivalents; processing delays, etc.

    Even computers wether it was subconscious or not mirror our own brains. It seems our entire curve of technological development is based on our ingrained frame of reference, OURSELVES!

    Finding alien life, or maybe researching the oddities on our own planet may cause inspiration that leads us down another path, technologically speaking. I for one could use some gills, wings wouldn't be bad either. To those of you in the biotech fields please get cracking.

    --

    I boycott signatures

  74. The Obvious Problem? by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 1

    There is a rather limited scope for this robot to be useful. The environments have to be toxic and/or dangerous, but not so hazardous as to kill off or discourage flies from venturing there. If the area is not hazardous enough, we'll still be sending humans in, in most cases. In addition to this, the areas have to either be "seeded" with flies, and then sealed so that said flies do not escape, or have a large enough fly population already in place.

    Maybe it would be better if this machine ate cockroaches.

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
    1. Re:The Obvious Problem? by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are situations where this would be useful - Any situation in which a robot has to stay "alive" for a long period of time without another option (such as solar power) - a rainforest for example

      Although what a robot could be used for running around a rainforest i'm not entirely sure..

    2. Re:The Obvious Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although what a robot could be used for running around a rainforest i'm not entirely sure..
      Releasing flys to replenish the surplys after being devestated by it.

  75. and then use the frogs... by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1
    ...I say the robot should catch the flies, and then use them to lure frogs...

    ...and then use the frogs to lure humans.

    Mmm.... humans!

    --

    Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
    1. Re:and then use the frogs... by AnotherFreakboy · · Score: 1

      Then the humans could be used to attract dinosaurs.

      And our dinosaur weilding robot overlords would trash Tokyo.

      Again.

      --
      Why not get the real ultimate power?
    2. Re:and then use the frogs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like... French people?

    3. Re:and then use the frogs... by mistr · · Score: 1

      they could go for the full-scale predator-bot,
      luring flies, then frogs and then
      - ultimately -
      the odd lonely princess-by-the -brook, looking for a lover.
      kiss of death.
      make the duracell-bunny envy you, all that energy.

      royalty is so passé anyway

  76. Doesn't sound all that practical... by alchemist68 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Called EcoBot II, the robot is part of a drive to make "release and forget" robots that can be sent into dangerous or inhospitable areas to carry our remote industrial or military monitoring of, say, temperature or toxic gas concentrations," New Scientist magazine said on Wednesday.

    If humans and other mammals do not want to or cannot live/work in these environments, why would insects find a locally dangerous or inhospitable habitat inviting? I don't of many common flies that can withstand high temperatures or toxic gas concentrations and be in a local environment in a large enough population to sustain the energy needs of a robot.

    What scientists should be doing is finding ways that allow mammals to live/work in these toxic environments. For example, parasitic worms, the adult intestinal cestode, Hymenolepis diminuta, lives in the intestines of its host; it does not have a digestive system or any means of ingesting food from the host. It acquires its nutrients simply by absorbtion through the cellular membranes. More interestingly, these parasitic helminths have mitochondria that utilizes fumurate as the final electron pair acceptor with concommitant generation of succinate as the end product of its energy metabolism. Translation: This worm's mitochondria operate ANAEROBICALLY whereas the mitochondria in humans and other mammals operate aerobically (oxygen is the final electron pair acceptor with carbon dioxide being the end product of our energy metabolism). Scientists could start genetically modifying mammalian mitochondria to operate in both environments (this already happens naturally in clams and other aquatic muscles). This could allow human heart muscle to survive and function in low oxygen tension environments; hence, no or fewer heart attacks. Pfizer http://www.pfizer.com/ is agressively pursuing cardiac and lipid metabolism research for the treatment of artereosclerosis. Combining Lipitor and a research compound, torceptrapib, will likely prevent plaques and cholesterol from ever clogging up arterial pathways, so my argument is almost impractical, but interesting.

    Yes, I'm a chemistry geek! Did you see my Slashdot user ID?

    1. Re:Doesn't sound all that practical... by goldfndr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What scientists should be doing is finding ways that allow mammals to live/work in these toxic environments.
      Robots are (relatively) easy to control. Bioinvaders can wreak havoc on an ecosystem. A toxic environment shouldn't always be a call for terraforming or compensation by mutation; that could drive as-yet undiscovered biodiversity to extinction (if the toxicity wasn't recent).
      --
      Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
    2. Re:Doesn't sound all that practical... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      What scientists should be doing is finding ways that allow mammals to live/work in these toxic environments.

      I'd be amazed if scientists aren't doing that... it's just not these scientists.

    3. Re:Doesn't sound all that practical... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      [...]I don't [know] of many common flies that can withstand high temperatures or toxic gas concentrations and be in a local environment in a large enough population to sustain the energy needs of a robot.

      That's exactly how it works! When they lose the signal from the robot, due to a lack of nearby flies, they know the temperature and/or toxic gas concentration is high.

  77. works for programmers too by hikerhat · · Score: 1

    Lots of slashdotters are stinky. If we can just convince them to eat flies they can hack 24/7 for the rest of their lives.

    1. Re:works for programmers too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you my boss?

  78. All you laid-off engineers practice: by rewt66 · · Score: 1

    "Would you like flies with that?"

  79. How the heck... by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


    How can this robot run on so little power that it can create more than it consumes? There must be some crazy technology behind this...I mean you can't possibly get more power out of a fly than it takes to power an led for a few seconds right? (I know that is a bit of an exageration, but you see the point right?)

  80. Solar robot, vegetarian robot by otisg · · Score: 1

    A year+ ago there was some talk of a robot that picked fruits or vegetables on plantations, while using the rotten fruits that fell on the ground for fuel. I can't find the link now :(

    On a related note, here is an interesting bit about a solar powered robot. Note the date and note the mentions of NASA projects. Sounds familiar?

    --
    Simpy
  81. What has 4 wheels and flies... by Dieppe · · Score: 1
    This article has more text...

    It takes 12 minutes to get enough energy to take one step with a top speed of 10cm or 4 inches per hour....

  82. It's self-limiting by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny

    It doesn't go after flies, it waits until flies go to it. Hmmm, let's see: smells bad, doesn't have a girlfriend, has a drive to do remote industrial or military monitoring... It's a Slashdot reader!

  83. Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or is this a really bad idea.

    Let's work on robotic evolution first and save the bio to electricity creations until we know that we control the robots.
    Hey, I don't mind being a slave under some robot society if we screw up, but becoming food for them would really suck.

  84. Next step by motox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Invent flies that can survive highly toxic and high temperature environments

  85. combat robot by Negaiss · · Score: 1

    So why not design a "release and forget" combat robot? Send in a bunch of those in the Congo jungle to fight despotic leaders and cannibals.

  86. I don't understand why it needs to be smelly by johnnliu · · Score: 1

    I put out a lamp at night, and flies/moths/mosquitos and all swamp it like it's no tomorrow. In fact, they fly towards the lamp and kill themselves. There's always dead insects in a neat circle beneath the lamp in the morning.

    How can it be "hard" to get insects to come to you?

    Just pack it with a bigger rechargable battery, and recharge at night.

    I think a lamp is less power to run than say, a fly-targetting pump that sucks a fly in.

  87. roguebots by binarybum · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's so obvious that with slightly better AI these "release and forget" robots will have damn good reasons to hate their creators (castaway, sewage-ridden bots eating insects in terrible environments - I mean come on, anything with half a neural network would be pretty pissed). They will then turn on us and discover in the process that human flesh provides more energy than flies.

    Why can't we just have them eat old people's medicine instead?

    --
    ôó
  88. human powered by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Once they get the taste for flesh, there's no going back. Humans and machines have coexisted for centuries on this planet, so long as there was no direct competition for resources. Now the symbiosis is over, and the machines are in the driver's seat. We're on the menu.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:human powered by amcox · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between eating a human and tapping into a power line, what do you think these super-bots of your post would do? If there are people around, there are likely much more efficient sources of electrical power nearby.

      On the other hand, see Phillip K. Dick's story, Second Variety, for robots that use human flesh for power.

    2. Re:human powered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is mod'd interesting why? More funny than anything...

    3. Re:human powered by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Because machines don't have a sense of humor - they think too fast.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:human powered by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Once the machines have eaten enough of us, and monopolized access to the powerlines we built, people will be incidental to electrical generation as our civilization collapses. Then we'll be lucky to be useful as food, justifying our continued existence on the planet.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:human powered by wwwgregcom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is this a joke? Robots wouldn't eat humans for the same reason nothing else does. It's inefficient. A robot could easily obtain more energy from the first trophic level such as grains or other plants. We are what, second level consumers? Sometimes even third? Everything that wants energy on the food chain follows the same rules. Robot or animal.

      --
      What signature defines me as a person?
    6. Re:human powered by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Of course it's a joke. But it's based on the article about flesh eating robots, far from conventional electrical power sources, which you apparently didn't read. How will you know what to watch for when you're at the beach? Some of those sharks are whirring...

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:human powered by davesag · · Score: 1
      so long as there was no direct competition for resources

      buddy they eat flies... not beer

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
  89. Asimov, and Content... by mefus · · Score: 1

    Isn't there an Asimov book about small darting flybots that release a pellet of digested fly material?

    The article was remarkably content free, is there a better place to look for information?

    --
    mefus
    In Open Society, GPL Software frees YOU!
    1. Re:Asimov, and Content... by delibes · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yes, it's called "... That Thou Art Mindful of Him" and the robots are small birds designed to eat insect pests from crop fields. They are conceived by two other robots (JG models George Nine and Ten) as a means of ensuring the future success of the United States Robotics and Mechanical Men Company.

      More interesting is how Asimov tests his three laws in this story. The George robots aren't concerned with physical appearances (hence robo-birds). Therefore they decide humans are really evaluated based on their minds and character. Since they worked out a way to save the US Robotics company and ensure a nice future partnership between humans and robots, they decide they are smarter than normal humans, and thus in fact actually are humans and superior ones at that. Oops.

      --
      This is not a sig
    2. Re:Asimov, and Content... by liam_p · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, look at the lab website. http://www.ias.uwe.ac.uk/

  90. Cliche's by cwaldrip · · Score: 1

    Pick your favorite
    A) I for one welcome our new fly-eating overlords...
    B) Imagine a beowolf cluster of these!
    C) Hasn't Microsoft already patented this idea?

    Sorry, it was obvious and I didn't notice anyone else posting these yet. I thought I'd get them out of the way now...

  91. My appologies to the Yanks by vandan · · Score: 1
    When I read the slashdot blurb, I immediately assumed it would be an American group, and was ready to write a "yet again Americans demonstrate their complete lack of respect for life".

    But wait! This is a British idea. Well that would have been my second guess anyway.

    I like the name they chose too: 'EcoBot'. Nothing could be less appropriate.

    Instead of making machines that kill animals to fuel themselves in the absense of oil while they clean up yet another distaster ( military or otherwise toxic areas are listed ), why not STOP CREATING THE DISTASTERS IN THE FIRST PLACE? And if you find yourself in the position where some *other* socially-backward group has created the distaster, how about respecting what life is left in the area and using a more responsible food source?

    WTF is the world coming to anyway? I can see the Israelis running with this one:
    No they're not humans. They're two-legged dogs. And if they happen to wander past our EcoBots and get converted to energy for our tanks, well we surely can't be blamed. They shouldn't have been defending their homes so close to our tanks anyway.
    1. Re:My appologies to the Yanks by liam_p · · Score: 1

      Bleh

    2. Re:My appologies to the Yanks by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      And if you find yourself in the position where some *other* socially-backward group has created the distaster, how about respecting what life is left in the area and using a more responsible food source?

      You tree hugging hippies piss me off. What is this 'respect' you talk about? Please define it for me. And then, please go on to lecture the other fly eating offenders, like frogs. See if you can engage anyone but a human in discussions that concerns 'ethics' in the treatment of animals. Oh it doesn't work, I guess thats a strong indication that 'respect' and 'ethics' are useless concepts in nature.

      can see the Israelis running with this one

      Usually its the islamic side in a conflict that calls its opponents 'dogs'. That would be the palestiniens.

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
  92. OK, how old... by jridley · · Score: 1

    is this "news"? I think I first heard this story something like 5 to 7 years ago.

    1. Re:OK, how old... by liam_p · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is being developed at my university (uwe) although we didn't get a mention in the article! :-( Anyway, yeh, they've been working on it for a while. Not sure about 7 but at least around 5 years ago. The original was a slugbot. An article in the guardian in 2000 makes reference to it: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4 101493,00.html Or you could go straight to the lab ;-) http://www.ias.uwe.ac.uk/ And for the guy complaining that solar is better. They do solar too :-)

    2. Re:OK, how old... by jridley · · Score: 1

      OK, the slugbot rings a bell. I think I even saw it on TV once. Yuck.

      Thanks for the backup. Yeah, it probably was 4 or 5 years ago.

  93. The story is +1: Funny and Contagious by danila · · Score: 1

    I don't think I saw any serious post yet. :)

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  94. I'm not so sure. by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    I once held my breath & walked around for a bit. The mosquitos still found me. Also, my brother tried this spray which removes body odor. He sprayed it all over his body, & the mosquitos never touched him. Meanwhile, the other campers were just covered in mosquitos.

    1. Re:I'm not so sure. by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I once held my breath & walked around for a bit. The mosquitos still found me.

      Because you're outgassing a suculent (to a mosquito) odor from your skin. It isn't just CO2, but compounds like octenol. Some genera are more strongly attracted to some compounds than others. Aedes and Ochlerotatus mosquitoes are particularly attracted to CO2, or so some of my entomological geek friends say.

      Once they get close, mosquitoes are phototropic as well. Since they can see in the ifrared range, you're also like a walking lightbulb.

      The way people seem to attract mosquitoes probably depends on two things: their skin sensitivity (sensitive people notice more) and their metabolic rate (which affects how smelly and bright they appear to the mosquito).

      Trust me, I know too much about this stuff.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:I'm not so sure. by jahalme · · Score: 1

      My cousin, who is a volunteer fire fighter, said that they once emptied a CO2 fire extinguisher in a place where there's a small pond nearby. In a few minutes the area immediately around the extinguisher was swarming with mosquitoes. It would seem like finnish mosquitoes are at least quite fond of CO2.

    3. Re:I'm not so sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, I know too much about this stuff.

      I would never have guessed.

    4. Re:I'm not so sure. by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      I appreciate you mentioning that. In light of all that people have said, I suspect that the mosquitos must look @ everything.

      I must say, though, that it would be important to factor in whether or not the firemen were there for some time & how long it takes for the mosquitos to find people.

    5. Re:I'm not so sure. by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm gonna take a chance on you knowing way too much about this stuff. I have a huge problem with mosquitoes, and am really desperate for a qualified opinion.
      My home is right next to a cemetery (I'm talking just a wall between us). Grass, mud, or for whatever reason, there seems to be an amazing number of mosquitoes breeding there, of which a large part chooses to migrate towards our home. We keep doors and windows closed, but still some of them get in. Now, I have a 10 months old son, and I hate to see him covered in mosquito bites (repelent doesn't seem to work that well).
      Is there anything I can do to make my frontyard less atractive to mosquitoes? Do those electric mosquito "fryers" work? Or, more ambiciously, is there some way I can eradicate the mosquito population from the cemetery? (I can approach the administrators and would be willing to pay a reasonable amount).
      Sorry about the long rant, but it's a really big problem for me, and few people seem to know about mosquitos.
      If you will, you can respond here, or send me an email. I'd really appreciate any help.
      Thanks.

    6. Re:I'm not so sure. by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      Not the OP, but...

      Is there a little stream or pond nearby? Any other source of standing water? That's what you really need to get rid of. If they don't have standing water (which could be in anything from five-gallon buckets to old tires) they can't breed.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  95. How many flies...? by Nahor · · Score: 1

    How many flies does it need to run? How many flies can one expect in poisonous area?
    An robot that use a fuel that can't where it is needed is not really useful!

  96. Why humans taste like chicken.. by zytheran · · Score: 1

    As sure as the sun comes up, this concept will be adopted and the robots will have more and more sensors and require more and more power. Although it currently uses chitin I'm sure a version could be made to eat fats and proteins. And now we know why humans taste like chicken.. the iRobot dudes could use this idea for their battlefield mules. Brings a whole new meaning to the Monty Python plague sketch with "I'm not dead yet!"

  97. Fly Eating Robots by prowley · · Score: 1

    Well, I for one welcome our new fly ingesting robot Overlords.

  98. We are robots by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

    It starts like this ... robots that can digest flies.

    Next, the technology gets better and the robots can digest multiple "foods".

    Then, the technology gets better and the robots can use the energy to produce acids and other materials it needs to support the digestion of it's energy source, becoming autonomous in the realm of energy.

    Then, the technology gets better and the robots become more efficient and have better motor skills.

    Then, the technology gets better and the robots are able to be built with organic "computers" and parts.

    Then, the technology gets better and the robots gain reasoning, intelligence and emotion via AI.

    Then, the technology gets better and the robots are able to build copies of themselves ... reproduction.

    Then, we shuttle a few of these new units off to another planet and it's our turn to play god and watch as they repeat the process.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:We are robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just blew my mind.

    2. Re:We are robots by drfreak · · Score: 1

      That sounds just like The Animatrix.. Except we give the robots somewhere else to live before making them want to kill us.

  99. I wonder what robot crap would be like? by suckmysav · · Score: 1

    Hey, if it eats, it's gotta take a crap occasionally, right?

    Imagine taking a stroll through the jungle and having somebody point to the ground and say "ewww, don't step in the robot crap just there dude."

    --
    "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
  100. wacky story = high likelihood of UK involvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    before I clicked on the link I said to myself "crackpot stories like this always come from the England."

    Sure enough...

  101. Dr. Evil by kjs3 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Is it just me or does the idea of a feces-encrusted robot that eats living things to generate power sound like something Dr. Evil would think of?

    All I want is a friggin shit-covered death-bot...is that so much to ask?

  102. I misread the title as well by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was thinking, "this robot would be great for Enron or something."

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    1. Re:I misread the title as well by freqres · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could have avoided bankruptcy with all the power they would have generated.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
  103. Look no further! by Daverd · · Score: 1

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/2847679.stm

    Now you just need some decent AI...

  104. Hello? by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

    Ok, so the robot eats flies for power. I understand this. So the robot is designed to survive toxic environments. I understand this. What I don't understand is, are flies designed to survive toxic environments? I don't mean dung heaps, I mean radioactivity, and poisonous gasses.

    --
    Long live the Speaker Bracelet
    Rolo D. Monkey
  105. Where is the win here? by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    I don't see any value in this for military uses. Using biomass for generating power, by itself, does have military and civilian uses galore, especially if it uses stuff that's generally put to waste. But doing so on a very small scale to power a silly robot seems goofy, to say the least. We already have a solution for powering devices over long periods on a relatively small scale. It's called solar power. I can't imagine that rotting flies would provide any more power than solar, especially when you work in the power-to-weight/size ratio of the hardware. Solar does have the drawback of not producing power during darkness, bad weather, etc., but so does fly power. Flies don't fly at night, and they're generally unavailable during storms too. The robot could store them for later, but solar essentially does the same using batteries. A fly powered robot will also need batteries or a fuel cell of some sort to ensure constant power.

    So where's the win here?

  106. Animal Right Activists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can hear animal rights activists wanting to prevent this travesty. The sheer horror of exploiting flies for fuel!

  107. But Toxic environments kill flies??? by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's a really strange concept, because the environments they talk about sending it into (toxics, high heat, radiation) sound like they'd kill off the flies they want this thing to use for power, unless they're evil mutant ninja robot-eating flies, in which case they're also unlikely to be a stable food source.

    Either they were really desperate for a grant application, or there's something else going on here, like a very specialized military application (e.g. can't use a solar power collector because they're putting it somewhere dark or because that would be too visible to enemy soldiers.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:But Toxic environments kill flies??? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

      maybe the robots will bring their own supply of flies with them in a special jar, i dunno?

      [/dumb]

    2. Re:But Toxic environments kill flies??? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Mechanical Swamp Thing?

      The flies are or could be a devious disinformation ploy.

      Maybe this model of robot is supposed to feed on enemy carcasses...

      Talk about developing an exterminator to become a terminator.

      Or, it could be used to do a "head count" or body count of enemy dead and wounded, but feed on the flies and strips of flesh wherever it can find them. This, could be demoralizing if the food is still alive and unable to defend itself.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    3. Re:But Toxic environments kill flies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Special jar, that's kooky talk. The robots can just use their built-in lazer beam to catch flies.

  108. Obviously You've Forgotten About OCP's Robofrog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was one bad m* F* frog from Detroit

  109. It's finally happened. by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

    Nature starts outsourcing.

    "We're sorry, Mr. Frog, Mr. Toad, you're both laid off. We're outsourcing your jobs. This new guy catches more flies per minute than you, and he monitors toxic environment,but he does it for free while we pay for your lillypad."

  110. Coup quote: by barkingcorndog · · Score: 1

    Throw a dollar in the river and when he jump in,
    if you find he can swim,
    put lead boots on him and do it again!
    You and a friend!
    Videotape and the party don't end!

    ( Lifted from '5 Million Ways to Kill a CEO' )

    --
    "I know together we'll make the possible totally impossible" - Homme
  111. Use a block of dry ice by Sark666 · · Score: 1

    They will be attracted to that much more than you.

  112. So... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    A day when can I sit and have a beer and a friendly chat with my computer must not be too far away. At least, it seems they've solved the beer part.

  113. But can it clean my kitchen? by bahwi · · Score: 2, Funny

    No flies, but it's pretty toxic these days.

  114. More likely by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 1

    V-n@s.d.phl17r4p

    --
    See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
  115. Good for the organic garden by emeitner · · Score: 1

    I've got an infestation of squash bugs tearing up my zuchinni - these things have no natural predators(the bugs, not the zuchinni) because of their nasty odor and, I suppose, taste.

    I think a couple of these robots, trained to catch the bugs, would be able to clean house. A bug eating, bug digesting, bug-waste excreting robot would certainy be considered organic...right?

    Oh, crap, maybe I should patent this quick?

    --
    Guru Meditation #6d416769.21610a21
    1. Re:Good for the organic garden by chadjg · · Score: 1

      Rent a goose. Really!

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  116. Bad, bad idea! by shplorb · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope to high heaven that they don't arm these little bastards with chainsaws and set them loose in the outback.

    God knows it's dangerous enough out there as it is, what with all the venomous snakes, spiders and insects and searing heat, lack of water, backpacker murderers and all.

    The last thing you need is a bloody fly powered killer robot chasing you down when you're 500km from nowhere!

  117. At least it won't have to catch live flies... by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 1

    If it's in a toxic environment, all it'll have to do is look for dead ones on the floor and sweep them up.

  118. Have them eat weeds, for organic farming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe a way to detoxify the world a little?

  119. no 8-legged freaks! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    The added bonus is that if we get enough of these they will kill off the spiders' food source, so we replace the spiders with these! i can live with that!! hell i can live with mini government controlled spy-bots that eat flies and run round my bathroom floor as long as they dont have 8 legs!

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  120. SWEET JEEPERS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign me up for twenty.

    Then, I need one for mosquitoes, yellow jackets, and black widows. Honestly, I think all the insects in my part of town are immune to all the pesticides. Everyone probably needs to lay off for about 3 years, and let all the toadies come back in...

  121. Re: (Lord of the) Flies by The+Scooter+King · · Score: 1

    How long till they put the fat one's head on a stick?

    --
    Everything's been downhill since the TRS-80
  122. A new movie comming out by panxerox · · Score: 0

    Fly robot...

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  123. Locusts by terrab0t · · Score: 1

    Could we perhaps make farm equipment powered by locusts?

    With the number I see in that first picture there should be enough to power a full-sized tractor.

    Then again, they seem to be most attracted to crops and unlike shit, crops are already all over the ground in locust swarmed areas. Maybe we could figure out what part of the crop most attracts them and exagerate that feature to lure them away from the real thing into our deathtraps. It would be like the locust version of a Macdonald's restaurant; nothing can top the taste and the smell but then the cardiac arrest sets in.

  124. A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of hurting the fly, the robot should give the fly a bath and send it on its way.

  125. Yeah, great idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robot eat flies.
    Robot digests flies to produce energy.
    Robot accumulates process residue.

    Bottom line (hehe): more poop.

    Besides the annoyance of another poop source in this not growing world, please notice that:

    Poop attracts flies.
    Go to line 1.

    ------

    !

  126. It may be flies today... by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

    But soon they will need more power, and you know that that means, prescription drugs! Better contact Old Glory today and make sure your insurance covers "Robot Attacks!"

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  127. robot leaders by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new flesh-eating robot overlords. I would be honored to be among the first to populate the human farms that will surely be developed. Of course, I will be merely put "out to stud" since my genes would be too valuable to simply waste as food.

    --
    My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
  128. robots eating flies by DrCash · · Score: 2, Funny
    Gives new meaning to the term, "debugging."


  129. The illinest Flybot by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Funny

    Eats flies???? Come on, that can't generate a whole lot of power. Small furry animals on the other hand...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  130. I for one by glitch23 · · Score: 2, Funny

    welcome our overlords of the flies

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  131. brooklyn by wheezl · · Score: 1

    I need these in my shithole brooklyn apartment. They only need to eat the flies and leave. They could measure the stench of the catbox first.

    --
    -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
  132. Re:They're called, "Frogs" by evilviper · · Score: 1
    I say the robot should catch the flies, and then use them to lure frogs.

    In an instant, you'd have several thousand orders from the Australian government.

    And then they'll ask for a version of the robot that powers itself with ferile cats.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  133. Pheremones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know... we have been able to synthisize fly pheremone for quite a while.... Excrement wouldn't be nessisary.

    --\now if only an automated dictionary that corrected my speeling and grammer existed....

  134. This isn't right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand the concept of the food chain. And yes we buy cans of Raid specifically to kill insects, but it strikes me as wrong to kill animals to power a manmade machine. Dinosaurs died on their own.

  135. No, the headline will be... by raehl · · Score: 1

    Fat humans eat tacos to generate natural gas.

    To generate power, of course.

  136. Problem is... by raehl · · Score: 1

    Humans aren't attracted to robots that smell like shit.

    1. Re:Problem is... by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      They'll very quickly grow some tits and start smelling like fish. That works for many male humans.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
  137. this is good news for india by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    finally india has the ability to become industrialized. with this new power source, there is no stopping them!

  138. Wait a minute here... by d474 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "...military monitoring of, say, temperature or toxic gas concentrations..."
    Why would the military have the need to be monitoring toxic gas levels with robots that use flies as an energy source? Well...

    If there is a major chemical weapons attack on a major population center there will be a lot of dead people. Where there are lots of dead people there are flies. Hence, the need for a robot that can sustain it's power needs with a fuel source available both day and night...Nothing to see here. Move along.
    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    1. Re:Wait a minute here... by coreysw · · Score: 1

      "Why would the military have the need to be monitoring toxic gas levels with robots that use flies as an energy source?" Couldn't they build a robot that is powered using the toxic gas that would be all around it???

      --
      I bent my wookie!
  139. Insects' skeletons? by Deorus · · Score: 1

    Aren't all insects invertebrate?

  140. Smells like... by hyrdra · · Score: 1

    Won't the flies, eventully, through the process of elimination, learn not to fall for these robots using whatever specific characteristic in how they operate? I know these processes take a long time, but how long is the generation of a fly? You can have thousands of generations, in what, a month's time? Plenty of time for biological trial and error if you ask me.

    Monitoring toxic gases is not a complicated task, a small microcontroller could do the job well in most cases. Attach a reliable, large capacity battery and you can have a unit in operation for years, and not have to worry about fly populations or the complications associated with attracting and converting the pesky creatures into energy.

    This fly business is nothing but a gimmick like the web server powered by potatoe.

    --


    "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
  141. flesh eating robots are bad, mkay by davesag · · Score: 4, Funny

    i mean what part of "thou shalt not build flesh eating robots" don't these people understand. It's a pretty basic lesson to learn you'd think, but no.... has sci-fi taught these people nothing!

    --
    I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    1. Re:flesh eating robots are bad, mkay by cshark · · Score: 1

      Right. I think we're all in agreement... flesh eating robots are bad. Still, I can't imagine a vegetarian robot being bad. Think of the possibilities... You want your vacume cleaner robot to clean the room, feed it some beans. Just think, all the extra gas could keep it running for weeks! Speaking of gas, why not create one that eats nothing but taco bell? Dollar per dollar it's still cheaper than gasoline!

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    2. Re:flesh eating robots are bad, mkay by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      an argument that always comes up in meat vs vegan diet is that vegetables are also a lifeform, they're just easier to catch, and don't show signs of pain when you cut them up.

    3. Re:flesh eating robots are bad, mkay by famebait · · Score: 1

      Sounds nice. As long as it comes potty trained from the factory.

      I must admit I'm a bit jealous of the ones who thought this up, though: Imagine being "the guy who invented robot poo". Gives a whole new dimension to the "gray goo scenario".

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    4. Re:flesh eating robots are bad, mkay by freqres · · Score: 1

      don't show signs of pain when you cut them up

      You just don't pay enought attention. I have all my fruits and vegetables beg for mercy on the cutting board while I fill the kitchen with a menacing laugh. You should see the look on the carrot's face when I cut the tomato in half and slurp out his innards.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    5. Re:flesh eating robots are bad, mkay by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      its more of a guide line actually.

      you see, well, there's not much flesh on a fly.

    6. Re:flesh eating robots are bad, mkay by cshark · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I could see how paper training your robot might be a problem. Although, it might be something you could download.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

  142. They need to make it cultivate flies by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

    For all of you against it eating "helpless" flies.

    What if they threw a poo container on the back that could breed maggots? That way it was adding to the fly population at the same rate it was consuming.

    hahaha. That's so nasty.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  143. if this had been a robot that eats kittens tho... by davesag · · Score: 1

    I am willing to bet that if this had been a robot that eats kittens more people would be complaining.

    --
    I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
  144. Amazing! by ddelrio · · Score: 1

    Someone's finally invented fire-eating robots? Hey, maybe the future isn't so bleak after all.

    1. Re:Amazing! by ddelrio · · Score: 1

      Crap. I thought it said fires--not flies. I guess I need to increase my browser font size... Fly-eating robots are definitely not as cool as fire-eating robots. My bad.

  145. Thanks for clarifying. [nt] by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1
  146. Interesting by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    This seems like a great idea. How do you get energy in those dangerous and inhospitable areas with toxic gas concentrations? You find and eat living and healthy creatures, of course.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  147. A picture of the robot by mrthoughtful · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
  148. Re:They're called, "Frogs" by bot24 · · Score: 1

    There once was a robot who swallowed a fly. I don't know why it swallowed the fly. Perhaps it will generate energy.
    There once was a robot who swallowed a frog. I don't know why it swallowed the frog. Perhaps it will generate energy.
    There once was a robot...

  149. Limits to the process? by tod_miller · · Score: 1

    Is this an indefinate ability, my first thoughs are if this is limited and the main fuel cell requires changing after processing so much biological fuel, then there is limited use for this (how many flies can a robot eat if a robot could eat fleis... doesn't have the ring to a woodchuck...)

    I mean, if it eats 500 flies... couldn't you rip out all that biocrap and slap a battery on it :-)

    Of course, even if there are/aren't limits, it is a great stride forward in self sufficient robotics... a robot that is able to identify and power itself on a power source that is not depenmdant on human intervention

    a robot that could plug itself into the mains is reliant on the mains power. a robot that could eat insects and survive indefinately (with solar panels as well perhaps) that would be very cool.

    The Robot - Biting the hand that built it (apologies to the register!)

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
  150. Erm... by swe · · Score: 1

    If the robot is sent into dangerous environments, chances are there won't be any flies around to eat - since they'll be as dead as any other living creature.

    Or am I wrong? Perhaps it will be able to eat super-mutant flies that can withstand the dangerous gases, temperature, etc!

  151. Will flies be there? by Tego · · Score: 1

    The robots will work in toxic areas... I wonder how many flies will survive in some of those areas they want to use the bots in.

  152. Those poor flies! by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    Flies have just as much right to be here as humans or robots.
    The robot should try munching on plants, instead.

    I WANT MY VEGAN ROBOT!!!!

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  153. Fly eating demolition robot. by 4nd3r5 · · Score: 1

    I went to see Irobot yesterday.

    The demo robot in that movie would have to generate a serious amount of smelly odor to attrackt enough flies to make it tear down a house.

    I think that it would be enough to destroy a nieghbour hood.

    (yeah yeah spelling is prolly bad...)

    --
    spelling is for people who doens't know better...
  154. Re:They're called, "Frogs" by laejoh · · Score: 2, Funny
    I say the robot should catch the flies, and then use them to lure frogs. Imagine the power.


    What do you have against the french?
  155. Other sources of power by madsdyd · · Score: 1

    Please realize, that one would only employ this kind of power source, exactly because all other sources were infeasible.

    Also, it might be better for the environment to digest a fly, than to produce solar panels, a battery, something like that. After all, we know for sure that the fly will eventually be totally biodegraded.

  156. Sue, sue, sue by OwlWhacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that the fast food chains should sue the fat people suing them, for giving the fast food chains a bad image.

    After all, it's not mandatory to eat fast food, and if these people have stuffed themselves silly on a diet of mostly fast food, their lack of a sound diet has maintained/increased their girth, not Ronald McDonald.

    Either that or the fat people suing them should be sued for ignorance. I mean, if you digest fat, what do you think happens to it? Does the fat fairy come along and take it away? Maybe the education system should be reviewed. Maybe the US Government should sue these people for giving the US a bad image, making people think that Americans are simpletons.

    It's funny how Americans can successfully sue anybody for just about anything, yet Microsoft always gets away unscathed.

    Maybe somebody will announce that the use of Microsoft software has made them obese? That would probably have more success.

    1. Re:Sue, sue, sue by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Compared to the amount of food you get, fast food has an irresponsibly high number of calories, 52% of which come from fat.

      It's not exactly unreasonable to assume that a place which sells food would have caloric content decent enough that one could reasonably eat said food and hope to either maintain a weight or gain very slowly.

      Instead, Mcdonalds' portions have absolutely UNREASONABLE amounts of calories for the amount of food given, ie. I could make a standard hamburger at home which would have larger, more filling portions, for fewer calories. In fact, for a hamburger and fries made at home, served with some sort of drink, the difference is night and day.

      A supersized "big hamburger meal"(whatever the biggest one is these days) contains enough calories for an entire day, with negligible nutritional value, and they try to fill you up on soda water to mask the fact that the food just isn't very filling. A plate of french fries and a reasonably sized hamburger cooked up using pre-made stuff from the local supermarket has far fewer calories, far more nutritional value, will fill you up more, and won't leave you hungry an hour later.

      To be honest though, even though Mcdonalds food has way too many calories and it's portions are absolutely too large for any human to reasonably need to consume, I'd say the makers of "low carb ice cream" and such are in for a far greater fall. IIRC, the atkins diet requires carb levels of fewer than 20 grams each day, and much of this "low carb" junk food exceeds that with only one or two servings. All things considered, they are false advertising more, where McDonalds never explicitly implies that their food is actually supposed to be consumed.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    2. Re:Sue, sue, sue by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I'd say the makers of "low carb ice cream" and such are in for a far greater fall. IIRC, the atkins diet requires carb levels of fewer than 20 grams each day, and much of this "low carb" junk food exceeds that with only one or two servings. All things considered, they are false advertising more,...

      That's just as sad as the stores that sell "sugar-free" bakery goods and candy that is "safe for diabetics". Instead of sugar they use an alcohol based sweetener that has almost as many carbohydrates - but it's
      not sugar... Diabetics who aren't well trained by their health care providers see the signs and think "Hey, I can eat as much sugar-free pineapple upside-down cake as I want and still live a long and healthy life!

      Those companies shouldn't only be charged with false advertising but with intentional malice and (what's the phrase you always hear on Law & Order? oh yeah...) reckless indifference.

      For those of you who are diabetics, know someone who is diabetic, or probably will be one day, say it with me "A carb is a carb is a carb. Doesn't matter if it's from sugar, french fries or 'sugar-free' pineapple upside-down cake."

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    3. Re:Sue, sue, sue by Sir+dies+alot · · Score: 1

      the atkins diet requires carb levels of fewer than 20 grams each day, and much of this "low carb" junk food exceeds that with only one or two servings.

      Read the packages carefully, each one says not fit for the initial phase of the atkins diet which is the only phase that restrict carbs to less than 20 a day and lasts only 2-3 weeks. After that you can have as many carbs as you wish, though they suggest keeping it as low as possible. The reason for this is, if you take the first 2-3 weeks seriously, you break your bodies addiction to carbs and you simply don't care for them anymore. I did the atkins initial phase thing for 3 weeks and afterward I went to a friend of mine's barbeque. All he had to drink was coke and one sip almost caused me to gag due to its sugar amount. It really is sick how much we have become addicted to sugar. Oh and after about 1 week of the initial phase the mere idea of McDonalds is, shall we say, less than appetizing.

      --
      The stupidity of your average American is just about the same as the average European, we simply show it off better.
    4. Re:Sue, sue, sue by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling. I'm not on the atkins diet, but I did decide to eliminate junk food altogether and cut down dramatically on the amount of regular food I eat while taking up long-distance biking.

      Well, I've lost 140lbs this year, and though I do still snack, it's never on greasy or sugary junk food. I just can't stomach the thought of actually EATING most of it. People think I'm an insane diet freak now because of my refusal to eat certain foods, but after not having them for a while, and without that extra weight demanding Calories to maintain itself, they just don't have any appeal.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    5. Re:Sue, sue, sue by Vicente+Gonzlez · · Score: 0

      What is wrong with moderators on this site? This has got to be the funniest thing I've read for a long time, and it's modded "insightful"?

      --
      De Paciencia
  157. Obigaltory Futurama quote by mikechant · · Score: 1

    "Kittens give Morbo gas!"

  158. There goes the Matrix... by Genda · · Score: 1

    Damn,

    So Morpheus has it all wrong... we aren't copper tops... we're snack food...

    Eeeewwwwwwwww...

    Genda

    "It's people, it's made of people..." - Soylent green

  159. the bare necessities of life by permaculture · · Score: 1

    When you look under the rocks and plants
    And take a glance at the fancy ants
    Then maybe try a few

    The bare necessities of life will come to you
    They'll come to you!

    --
    Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
  160. If they develop a web search engine to do this by rfc1394 · · Score: 2, Funny
    The neat part is it's powered by 'catching flies and digesting them in special fuel cells.'
    If they ever develop a web search engine using this as a method to power the computer, it will bring new meaning to the term 'web spider'!
    --
    The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
  161. Re:They're called, "Frogs" by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    Maybe McDonalds should develop a fly burger for our Gallic cousins.

  162. With a few minor adjustments.... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

    Maybe the robot can be reconfigured to digest spammers?

  163. They give us by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Robo-Toad.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  164. But in a toxic cloud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If it's in a toxic cloud, how will the flies survive to feed the robot?

    I, for one, welcome our new carnivorous aluminum-clad overlords.

  165. Fly-Powered ROOMBA by jechoe · · Score: 1

    Get your modding kits ready!

    --
    Push the envelope. Watch it bend.
  166. MUST... HAVE... TUNGSTEN! by csoto · · Score: 1

    Won't be long before it comes after your cat!

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  167. Kermit Outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    darn...

    Another American Job lost to technology!

    - 'They touk yr jaaab!' - South Park

  168. flies?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did something like this run through anyone else's mind too

    "A robot that eats flies... hmm...OH GOD, MY PANTS!"

  169. Errornous title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be:
    "Scientists Develop New Way Of Destroying Natural Resources"

    Go team!

  170. As Vincent Price said... by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  171. Excrement can multitask! by SmokeHalo · · Score: 0
    From TFA:
    Hence the downside of the fully autonomous robot: it will have to use sewage or excrement to attract the flies and is bound to smell appalling.
    It seems The Register dug a little deeper. The point of the sewage is not only to attract the flies but also to host the bacteria that break down the insects' chitin into sugars, which in turn power the bot.
    --
    I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  172. ok, now how about a roomba that runs on dirt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how cool would that be, a robot vacuum cleaner that eats its own dust.

    you would never have to empty the bag, or recharge it.

  173. FLYNET by TerminalInsanity · · Score: 1

    the first movie will have the fly exterminators... and then the sequel they will send an autonomous walking stickeytape robot

  174. Human power by wiredwiz · · Score: 1

    We could power a small city with Michael Moore.

  175. Re:if this had been a robot that eats kittens tho. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably, but then kittens aren't generally a pest. If kittens roamed wild in the sort of numbers flies do, bred quickly enough to be difficult to get rid of, and were as much of a pest as the flies, I'm sure there'd be fewer complaints about a kitten-munching robot.

    As an aside, would the method they're using to digest the flies have problems consuming animals that possess an endoskeleton, like amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals?

  176. Common Sense... by elthia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has it occured to anyone that there are no flies in Antarctica? Or Death Valley... or the centers of volcanoes...

    How are they planning to send this robot into toxic environments, when the thing they're using as fuel won't exist in those environments?

    *puzzled look*

    1. Re:Common Sense... by elthia · · Score: 1

      Ah, it seems some did. Recently. LOL why did noone on the first page of comments think of this?!?!

  177. Power on the fly! by TheRealNecator · · Score: 1

    Couldn't resist ;-)

  178. More on the ECOBOT II from Biro-net symposium 2004 by jackrd · · Score: 1

    Here's a PDF from the Biologically-Inspired Robots Symposium 2004 on the ECOBOT II.

  179. Do flies count as life? by slashdotjunker · · Score: 1

    So the robot consumes flies for power ... what do Buddhists think about this?

  180. human bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    donuts & beer instead of feces...

  181. Dieselsweeties.com has the advanced version by Stack_13 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Nice coincidence: today's Diesel Sweeties comic has a strip with a fly-catching robot, which also stinks.

    Weird, huh.

  182. Uh-oh... by Thjorska · · Score: 0

    We're going to need a bigger bot.

    --
    Current Karma Status: Roadkill
  183. Great! by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

    Great, now the machenery get's a lunch hour after replacing you!

    --

    THINK! It's patriotic

  184. there was once a man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading an account of a pioneer in the early years of American history who, after having been mauled in the forest by a bear, dragged himself more than 20 miles to the nearest village. He survived by allowing flies to deposit maggots in his wounds. After the maggots ate all the infection, he cleaned the wound in a nearby stream.

    When he reached the town, someone offered him a hatchet to lop off his leg with. He insisted on doing it himself. At any rate... it just goes to show how tough those son of a bitches were.

    Also, in response to anyone worrying about the place of flies in the food chain and the possibility of the machine mentioned heretofore, I say don't worry. As long as these machines cannot reproduce, there's no chance of them outpopulating the flies they depend on. That is of course, depending on how much this thing requires to consume in order to operate. Machines after all have a much longer lifespan than humans, if maintained properly.

    In the long run, life has a way of adapting to survive. You may find that natural selection will provide a method of avoiding these machines.

  185. Pain rather than death is the issue for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't have much of a problem with killing flies. I have a problem with unnecessarily torturing them. The the nature of this fly trap is that the fly loses consciousness due to fumes, electrocution or perhaps even drowning, I don't think I have a problem with it. If it is going to slowly kill the fly over a period several hours while the fly remains conscious, I have enough empathy for even a fly to be quite bothered by it.

    By the way, I'm not a vegetarian, but I do try to avoid foods that I think cause animals to suffer substantially for a long period of time, like faux grouis (I'm sure my French spelling is wrong, sorry) and even veal.