Slashdot Mirror


E-bike E-xperiences?

Jakedata writes "I am in the process of building my first e-bike. I intend to use it to commute to work a couple times a week, weather permitting. I can only assume that many members of the /. crowd are already riding e-bikes and would be only too happy to share their experiences. I am looking at a very affordable e-bike conversion kit from Golden Island Machinery. They offer a 36 volt lead-acid battery pack for it, but I am concerned that it will be too heavy. Rabbit tool has a selection of components and power options but they are pretty pricy. So, is Golden Motor's kit any good? Is lead acid OK to start off with? Does someone want to donate a direct-conversion methanol fuel cell to the project?"

520 comments

  1. eh? by va3atc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This thing has a top speed of 36km/h and 50km distance. I'd say it would come in handy to complement your peddling when the wind is not in your favor.

    Though I would have liked to have seen it hooked up to the derailleur as the motor specs says it has 'high torque'.

    I can usually maintain 35km/h effortlessly, but with this beast 45km/h could be the crusing speed if peddling and motoring can go hand in hand.

    Wouldn't go any faster on a pedal bike, leave that to the stunt people.

    --
    Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    1. Re:eh? by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't go any faster [than 35-45 km/h] on a pedal bike, leave that to the stunt people.

      It really depends on the bike. Mine feels fine going down hills at 50 km/hr, but the time I hit 88, it felt awfully squirrelly. OTOH, the tandem at 60 km/hr and better felt like that's what it was made to do.

      I vote for jettisoning the motor entirely. Add fenders and a rechargable light set instead. For geek points, add solar cells to charge the battery while you're in the office.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  2. Why not... by ericdano · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why not just invest in a good, light weight bike. It will cost you a lot, but the light weight construction will be a LOT easier for you to bike with.

    Something like a Trek or Cannondale.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Why not... by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 3, Funny
      Why not just invest in a good, light weight bike. It will cost you a lot, but the light weight construction will be a LOT easier for you to bike with.

      I don't think there's a bike light enough to make up for my heavyweight ass.

    2. Re:Why not... by recursiv · · Score: 2, Informative

      Once you start riding, you might be surprised to see how quickly you lose the ass. It won't happen overnight, but I am sure you or anyone else would be able to gradually lose weight, increase endurance and general health, even if starting from a very low level.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    3. Re:Why not... by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 1
      Once you start riding, you might be surprised to see how quickly you lose the ass.

      It was mostly a joke. During the spring and summer I take my mountain bike out on the trails every other weekend.
      BTW.. Why am I talking about my ass on slashdot? :-)

    4. Re:Why not... by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Well, then perhaps you should get rid of the weight....

      A mountain bike with it's wider tires might be better.....

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    5. Re:Why not... by oever · · Score: 1

      I was hoping this discussion would be about adding gear to your bike that shows you how fast you are peddling, what your acceleration is, etc. Also there are bikes where you have to paddle, but that have automatic gears. Where I come from, electric bikes are considered to be for old people.

      Seriously, does someone have a cool speedometer on his bike that stores a distance vs. time data on a convenient storage medium, e.g. usb-stick or memory card?

      Of course extra data like, inclination vs. time would be a cool addition for the extreme mountain bikers, as well as heart-beat and body temperature.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    6. Re:Why not... by arivanov · · Score: 1
      People underestimate the efficiency of a modern bicycle. Speaking out experience from the times when I was 20+ kg heavier then now :-)

      You can convert arse to muscle.

      Lose belly - no.

      Lose weight - no (at least at realistic commuting distances). You need at least 40 minutes one way pedaling flat out to start losing weight. In other words 8-9 miles with hills and traffic. 10+ miles on flat terrain.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    7. Re:Why not... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why am I talking about my ass on slashdot? :-)

      Better than the rest of the people here talking OUT their asses...

    8. Re:Why not... by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Interesting
      What utter nonsense. As soon as you start excercising, you start burning up calories faster than your resting state. If that leads to you burning more calories than you are eating, then you'll lose weight. If it doesn't, then you won't. Some people might need 10 minutes per day to lose weight, some might need 2 hours.

      Whether you lose weight from your arse or your belly is entirely down to your anatomy and how it distributed the fat in the first place. You will grow muscle in your arse from cycling, but if you aren't losing fat from your belly, you won't be losing it from your arse either. Fat is never "converted" to muscle.

    9. Re:Why not... by ericdano · · Score: 1

      No. But if you want, you could get a Child Trailer and haul around your linux/mac/windows laptop with you. And after you've worked up a sweat, you can play a little Quake or Doom or whatever, and check your email ;-)

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    10. Re:Why not... by Loco3KGT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually 95% of the calories you burn are at resting heart beat. And for every pound of lean muscle you burn 50 calories per day. The amont of calories you burn at a work out are almost worthless. That's why the best way to lose weight is : high protein low sugar diet and weight lifting. Cardio is good for working your heart but it won't make you lose weight.

      And it's very likely for him to lose fat from his arse before he loses it from his gut. Men lose it from certain parts before others. For instance, I lost it from my face, arms, and legs first. Now I'm having to completely alter my diet to lose it from my belly and chest because working out just isn't enough.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    11. Re:Why not... by bicycleguy · · Score: 1

      I would love to have aPower Tap but they retail >$800. Lance uses one to train. I'm a full time bike commuter not a pro racer. Might find one on Ebay some day......

      --
      Those who wish to control their own lives and move beyond the existence as mere clients and consumers- those people ride
    12. Re:Why not... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'd just forget about the whole e-bike thing and wait till Apple's i-bike comes out.

      Why you'll probably be able to get one for free just by clicking on random signatures on /.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    13. Re:Why not... by murdocj · · Score: 1
      That's why the best way to lose weight is : high protein low sugar diet and weight lifting

      Guess I'm a counter-example. I was the classic "fat-boy" as a kid. My lifestyle gradually changed and I lost some weight, but the big change was when I started living with friends who did a lot of cardio exercise. We'd run 8-10 miles at lunch and play 2 hours of ultimate frisbee after work. The weight dropped dramatically, even though I was eating like a horse.

      I've weightlifted occasionally to try to get some upper body strength, but I've never heard of weightlifting as a weight-loss technique. Fat -> muscle, sure, but you aren't going to lose weight.

    14. Re:Why not... by oever · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a bit overkill. Surely there's a way to connect a simple traditional speedometer, where a magnet on your spoke flies past sensor on your fork, to a chip with a couple of kb of memory. Basically all the system would need to do is to store the time between subsequent ticks.
      By the way this Power Tap that Armstrong is using, doesn't seem to register the gear you're using.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    15. Re:Why not... by Elbows · · Score: 1

      8-9 miles isn't realistic commuting distance? I do it every day -- and I get to work faster than I could on bus/subway.
      Many commuters travel farther than that. Especially in more rural areas where you don't have to stop frequently, longer distances are definitely feasible.

    16. Re:Why not... by bicycleguy · · Score: 1

      No need to know what gear you are in really. Speed vs pedal cadence are what is important to experienced riders. Indeed it is overkill.

      --
      Those who wish to control their own lives and move beyond the existence as mere clients and consumers- those people ride
    17. Re:Why not... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to call BS on you. After getting my B.S. I stopped riding my bike to school every day, and I put on some extra pounds (about 20-30). For the last year I have been doing some intermediate mountain biking every weekend, usually 5-9 miles offroad. My legs are like iron now, but I still have some flab on the belly. I'm starting to add situps to my routine in hopes that it will get rid of the flab there.

      Oh, and most of the effort you exert in biking builds muscles on your calves, not your thighs and ass. Unless you do a lot of standup/sitdown riding for hills, but if I was doing that much sitdown/standup I wouldn't be able to average 7 miles a trip. I live in florida, there aren't many hills.

      This is where I ride. The part by the river is mostly underwater and impassable until they get out there with chainsaws. (thank to hurricanes Charley Frances and Jeane)

      Oh, and one of the child posters mentioned that he never thought of weight-lifting as a weight loss exercise. It DOES convert fat into muscle, maybe not directly, but you DO burn the fat to make energy for the muscles to consume, and with enough of a workout, you will build muscle over time, so yes, you DO convert fat to muscle.

      --
      -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    18. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm going to call partial BS on you. You burn the fat to make energy, but you need protein to actually build the muscle, so you DON'T convert fat to muscle.

    19. Re:Why not... by nanter · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, adding situps to your routine will not do anything to expedite fat loss from your abdominal region any more so than any other type of exercise will. You will build muscle in your abdominal region, and will tone the muscle that is already there, but if it's under flab, it won't be very visible.

      Problem is, you don't get to choose where you burn fat. Working muscles in a particular region of the body serves to build those muscles, but does not cause the body to prefer to use fat from that area for energy over another area. You can do ab workouts and burn rear end fat, and you can do butt exercises and burn ab fat.

      It's not up to us.

    20. Re:Why not... by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      You'll lose weight when you build muscle because your lean muscle mass burns more calories per day than you could possibly burn during a 30 minute workout. When I do my 4.5 mile "strenuous" bike ride at lunch I still only burn about 150-200 calories. Considering I eat about 2000-2500 depending on the day, that's nothing.

      It's also much more important what you eat instead of what you don't eat. Sodas are the worst thing on the planet since they're so many calories and do absolutely nothing to fill you. And even if you lost weight but were still eating like a horse, that probably isn't a good thing. Just because you look like you're in great shape doesn't mean you are - Ask Arnold about his Quadruple Heart Bypass surgery... or David Letterman's Quintuple... When you consume high protein foods your body spends a large amount of calories trying to digest that food, upwards of 25 calories per 100 consumed. Whereas is burns 10-15 per 100 for fats and carbs.

      Statistics show that high protein dieters are twice as likely to lose abdominal fat than other dieters. And up to 48 hours after lifting weights your body is still feeling the effects of liftweights, doing things like burning fat.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    21. Re:Why not... by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      BTW, it's very easy to contribute your weight loss to your exercise regime - You worked out atleast 3 hours a day for 5 days a week plus whatever on the weekend. That's just crazy good. Most of us don't have the time to do that .. or prefer to do other things with their time.. either way _congratulations_. It isn't easy and anyone with the determination to change their physique deserves a hearty pat on the back

      I don't make my pro-health speeches from a "Always have been and always will be skinny/ripped/Ahnold" point of view. I played sports until high school and then got sucked in by the whole "Linux" thing and by the end of my freshman year of college was a nice 6' 235lb fatty. Took me two years of eating less + eating healthier and *running* as well as lifting weights to get down to 200lbs.

      Now I'm moving to a much more focused diet, more focused cardio program, and better lifting workout.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    22. Re:Why not... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      For the last year I have been doing some intermediate mountain biking every weekend, usually 5-9 miles offroad. My legs are like iron now, but I still have some flab on the belly.

      That is because most people lose weight from their belly last, it doesn't matter what kind of exersize you do, that is just how the fat melts... (did you lose weight from your face? were you working out your face?)

      Oh, and most of the effort you exert in biking builds muscles on your calves, not your thighs and ass.

      Either you are "ankling" (which will wreck your achilles, you should stop), or your seat is way too low. Cycling should most definatly work your thighs and butt the most.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    23. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you've not explored the options, but you can get a no-name frame for half (or less) the price of a trek or cannondale and still get the whiz-bang features.

      habanero cycles -- 695$ Ti frame

      also, it's much easier (i.e. cheaper) losing a couple pounds by exercising/eating in moderation/sleeping well than losing a few hundred grams on the bike with whiz-bang components/frame/wheels/etc.

      2c and not affiliated with aforementioned frame builders.

    24. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cardio is good for working your heart but it won't make you lose weight.

      I think I may disagree with you on this. I work at UPS, and pretty much just do cardio with some heavy lifting and I have lost 20 pounds in the past 2 months.

    25. Re:Why not... by be951 · · Score: 1
      ...I've never heard of weightlifting as a weight-loss technique. Fat -> muscle, sure, but you aren't going to lose weight.

      It often seems that way because when you start weight lifting you may not see the scale move, or it moves in the wrong direction. This is because you're building muscle as fast or faster than you're losing the fat. Depending on how much fat you have to lose, your fat loss will probably outpace your muscle gain before long. If you're only slightly chubby to begin with (and/or if you get into more serious bodybuilding), you may end up with a net weight gain. But you'll be thinner since muscle is denser than fat.

      And to clarify, muscle may replace fat in most areas but there is never a "conversion" of muscle to fat or vice versa. The reason people think muscle can turn into fat is because ex-jocks often change their exercise habits, but don't change their eating habits. Eventually, they end up with fat in the places they once had muscle.

    26. Re:Why not... by drew · · Score: 1

      The amont of calories you burn at a work out are almost worthless.

      I hear this cited an awful lot, and although it's true, it's mostly irrelevant if you workout regularly. A consistant workout schedule will increase your metabolism a noticeable amount, such that, while the calories burned during the workout are mostly negligible, you will burn a noticeably higher amount of calories throughout the day at resting heart beat. Someone who starts doing a >30 minute cardio workout at least 3-4 times a week on a consistent schedule will lose much more weight than calculating the number of calories burned during the workouts would indicate, and will be able to consistenly lose weight even without changing eating patterns.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    27. Re:Why not... by be951 · · Score: 1
      Actually 95% of the calories you burn are at resting heart beat.

      I'm not sure where you got that number, but it sounds rather high.

      The amont of calories you burn at a work out are almost worthless. Cardio is good for working your heart but it won't make you lose weight.

      These statements, of course, are utter nonsense. As you can see here, there are many activities that will result in weight loss of a pound of fat per week (around 4000 Calories) or so if performed for 30-45 minutes per day (depending on one's size and intensity level). Provided that one's weight is stable to begin with, which often is not the case for people trying to lose fat. Also, cardio gives an "afterburn" in which you continue to burn calories at a higher rate for a period after you stop exercising (more intense cardio gives a greater effect). You also get this from weight lifting, but weight lifting increases your BMR as well.

      Now I'm having to completely alter my diet to lose it from my belly and chest because working out just isn't enough.

      Diet changes are often necessary for stubborn areas, or if your diet was bad to begin with. The best strategy for weight loss is a combination of weights, cardio, and diet (and yes, higher protein, lower carbs tends to work better); with a focus on the activities you enjoy (so you'll be less likely to punk out after a couple weeks).

    28. Re:Why not... by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the response.

      I acknowledged to one of the first responders that I was a bit quick to post and not edit or re-think. What most people consider "cardio" is what I was referring to. The 10-20 minute jaunts on a bike or running that, over time, increase your metabolism but in themselves don't really burn any calories.

      In all honesty my workout regiment is 6 days a week with a mix of cardio and weight lifting due to the importance of cardio in a workout and in health in general.

      95% - I am looking for the source for that number and if I can find it I will post it. I just read it within the last few days so it's likely I misread a statement that was trying to emphasize that for most people it's the calories you burn the 23.5 hours you're not working out that matter more than the few you do while working out.

      My cardio is 15 minutes on a bike at what the bike probably labels as "medium difficulty" (I don't know the brand/make, but it goes to level 20 i think, I average level 10 - peaking at level 20 twice and dipping no less than 7) over 15 minutes then do a light 10 minute jog followed by a lot of stretching. Unfortunately for me I don't have a partner for any of my working out and - I lost my iPod :-( so not even music while i work out.

      I started out at 235 pounds about 3 years ago. Running got me down to about 215, dieting got me down to about 200-2005, and then combining those two with weight lifting I dipped down to 190. Unfortunately I graduated college, lost access to the gym, and moving 3 times in 3 months killed my ability to diet (I never knew where I was going to be so grocery shopping was never a good idea). I just started the "Abs Diet" by the editor of Men's Health and I've lost 4lbs in a little over one week.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    29. Re:Why not... by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Why not just invest in a good, light weight bike. It will cost you a lot, but the light weight construction will be a LOT easier for you to bike with.

      I bike to work for exersize, so maximum effiency is a bad thing. If my bike were more efficent, I'd have to find a longer route to work to get the same amount of exersize.

    30. Re:Why not... by be951 · · Score: 1
      Congratulations on your success. Sorry I missed your other response.

      I agree that 10-20 minutes a few times a week will not do much for anyone unless they're in the tiny minority whose diet brings them just to the edge, but not really losing weight consistently. Still 10-20 minutes here and there (say, 2-3 times a day) can add up. And even if you're going at light to moderate intensity, you're burning more calories than just sitting on your ass which is probably the alternative for most people. Quicker results, naturally, require greater intensity and duration. I think the real problem most people have when doing a light cardio session or two per day is that they are not changing their diet enough to stop gaining weight.

    31. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BasilBrush, your energy balance is missing a part: not only do you have to consider how many calories come in and how many calories are burned, but you also have to take into account the efficiency of the calorie conversion, starting from what you eat and how it affects your metabolism, through how it's digested, and all the way through to burning the fuel itself.

      This is important because every body is different. If I eat white bread, my metabolism slows down and I fall asleep (hypoglycemic) In addition, if I do interval training on my bike, my metabolism is WAY up for the rest of the day, and I burn a lot more calories; if I do just regular excercise, I get only a bit of a spike in my metabolism and I don't end up burning as many calories. (This second one is subjective speculation based on how I feel.)

    32. Re:Why not... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      You mean you have muscles in your legs now, but not in your abdomen. They type of excercise you do cannot have any effect on where the fat is lost from. The fat will be removed from all parts of your body but at different rates according to how your body is put together. There is nothing you can to to influence where fat loss will occur, short of lipsuction.

      The muscles in your tighs operate your ankle joint. This is not the joint that should moving much in order to rotate the pedals. It's your knee and hip joints that provide the movement. The muscles that generate those movements are in the thigh and arse area. Thus, it you are doing it right, those are the muscles that should show the greatest gain. It may be that the calf muscles are more obvious to you because of the smaller diameter, and you carry less fat there.

      Alternatively, I've just looked at the map you posted and it looks like you are doing BMX or mountain biking. Standing in the pedals would certainly explain your calf muscle growth. Because you are standing on the balls of your feet, supporting most of your weight through your ankles whilst being subjected to variable G forces, you are very nearly reproducing the thight raise machine at a gym.

      No, you cannot use the energy gained from fat burning to constuct muscle. The body doesn't work like that. It can only produce muscle mass from the food that you eat. However, excercise will both cause fat to be burned (directly and through quickened metabolism) and cause the micro-tears in muscle tissue that leads to food being converted to muscle growth.

    33. Re:Why not... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Yes I was simplifying, there's far more to it than can be written up in a single post. The main point I was trying to get across was that there is no magic number of minutes that everyone needs to do in order to lose weight. It varies with the body you were born with, how fit you are now, and how much and what you eat.

    34. Re:Why not... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      I agree weightlifting is a very good way to lose weight. The more muscle you have, the more calories you burn off at rest.

      However, the fact that cardio is an effective way to lose weight is seen by all the trim girls at the gym that only do aerobics, treadmill and excercise bike because they don't like the idea of having muscles.

      As you say, cardio doesn't burn off that many calories whilst actually doing it, but it speeds up the metabolism so that the burning is at an increased rate for hours after the excercise.

    35. Re:Why not... by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      I think the real problem most people have when doing a light cardio session or two per day is that they are not changing their diet enough to stop gaining weight.

      Between all of the advertisements for certain supplements and the "eat all the bacon you can!" diets it doesn't surprise me a bit that Americans, atleast, can't lose weight. But even when they do it seems they think "Oh I'm all better, back to my previous ways!" and eventually the weight comes stacking back on and they can't figure out why.

      Oh well, hey thanks for the discussion.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
  3. how about a real bicycle? by brer_rabbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when I was employed (oh so long ago...) I biked to work 2-3 times a week, about 12 miles each way. Screw the e-bike, get the real thing. Peddling your ass that distance will get you in great shape. On top of that, I find cycling a lot less stressful than driving, it's relaxing really.

    1. Re:how about a real bicycle? by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Funny

      when I was employed (oh so long ago...) I biked to work 2-3 times a week, about 12 miles each way.

      Hmmm.... biking 12 miles to work on a hot summer morning.... Now, I'm not a rocket surgeon, but is there a teeny possibility that this could somehow be related to being employed "oh so long ago"? :o)

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    2. Re:how about a real bicycle? by mykingdomforahorse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Though I understand your thought, I tend to get irked by bike enthusiasts who decry the e-bike and take an (often) macho approach to human-powered transportation. Maybe the poster isn't as concerned with "peddling ass" and is more worried about environmental issues, or simply agrees with you about the stress issues of commuting, and doesn't want to get all sweaty before work. (Thus begins "peddling ass" jokes.)

    3. Re:how about a real bicycle? by uss_valiant · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      I find cycling a lot less stressful than driving, it's relaxing really.
      Relaxing? Not really, when I'm on my bike, I feel the ultimate urge to cycle as fast as I can. Well maybe that's because I'm always late :).
      However, I hope I'll reach my destination tomorrow in time: 170 km in 8 hours on a mountain bike :/
    4. Re:how about a real bicycle? by still_sick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There're a couple twits in my office that do this (Bike to work every day as exercies).

      You can pick them out easily, because they end up smelling up the place.

      For the sake of all that is good and holy, DO NOT bike into work unless you intend to SHOWER when you get there.

      --
      ...Also, I didn't know Buggalo could fly.
    5. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, you can't just keep your mouth shut. If someone asked if a specific butter tastes better than another, are you going to answer the question if you know it, keep your mouth shut if you don't, or would you prefer instead to insist that the rest of the world just buys milk and churns butter each morning since that tastes best.

      Get a life. If you worked for me, I'd can your ass out of principle, you obviously can't provide any valuable input.

    6. Re:how about a real bicycle? by agent · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      My father bikes every day! The only time he will not bike is when there is to much snow, or he needs to do some thing like donate blood, or go to a VFW meeting.

      You do not realize how easy you have it.

      And yes, I am a hippo crate (I do not bike every day), but I would need to be paralyzed before I purchased a human transporter.

      Respectfully yours,
      -Steve

    7. Re:how about a real bicycle? by rainer_d · · Score: 1

      > Hmmm.... biking 12 miles to work on a hot summer
      > morning...

      The trick is, to get up early enough, so it's not too late in the morning.
      And you must try not to ride too fast.
      Also, after some training, you're not going to sweat that easily ;-)

      Rainer

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    8. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Peter+Eckersley · · Score: 1

      However, I hope I'll reach my destination tomorrow in time: 170 km in 8 hours on a mountain bike :/

      I hope you have slick tires.

    9. Re:how about a real bicycle? by really? · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do it all the time in Tokyo weather. No problem. You get there early, wait a few minutes to stop sweating, and do the "towel wash and change of clothes" thing.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    10. Re:how about a real bicycle? by really? · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed, but "peddling your ass that distance" would also land you in jail in most countries, not to mention making you late for work.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    11. Re:how about a real bicycle? by julesh · · Score: 4, Informative

      I cycle 10 miles to work some days. This isn't actually too bad a problem, provided:

      1. You allow yourself enough time. If you don't have to rush, you won't sweat very much on a ride of that length. I like to leave myself an hour so I can take it nice & easy.

      2. You live in a relatively flat area. I wouldn't want to do it if the office was halfway up the side of a mountain, for instance...

      3. You pack aerosol deodorant and a change of clothes. This will remove the worst of your sweat problems.

    12. Re:how about a real bicycle? by whookey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find the odors emanating from the fat and lazy, the smokers, and those who need to distance themselves from smelling like real people by applying an excess of chemicals to their bodies to be much more bothersome. I pedal in to work every day awake, usually with a smile on my face. Try biking sometime, it's great.

      --
      somebody bent my whookey.
    13. Re:how about a real bicycle? by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      If they don't really care about the weight loss and the fitness factor then they should just buy a scooter or a motorcycle instead. Why bother with all that troublesome peddling unless you're looking for some health benefits. Motor cycles are incredibly fuel efficient and great for nipping around traffic, plus you can go for pleasant mountain rides on the weekends.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    14. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Cookeisparanoid · · Score: 1

      I totally agree I used to bike to work when I worked at an office that had a staff shower, the place I work now while closer dosnt so I wont be cycling any time soon.

    15. Re:how about a real bicycle? by goneutt · · Score: 1

      That in part explains why there were gym style showers at the call center I used to work at. Never used, no one biked to work cuz no one could afford to actually live in that part of town for the wages they paid us.

      --
      Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
    16. Re:how about a real bicycle? by webgit · · Score: 4, Informative

      On top of that, I find cycling a lot less stressful than driving, it's relaxing really

      Cycling is relaxing, but only if you're doing it where there are no idiot drivers anywhere near you.

      I spent a year cycling the 45-minutes to work, unfortunately I don't now as I work much to far away from home to even consider cycling. When I was cycling, and even now when I cycle, not a journey went by without some idiot driving to close, pulling out in front of me or doing something completely idiotic within a few metres of me, putting my life in danger.

      The main reason I cycled was because I had no other means of transportation, I mean there was the bus, but it was often full and therefore wouldn't stop for you, the cost adds up paying for it everyday, and the majority of the time it was quicker and easier to cycle, although it was good to know I had the option if I couldn't cycle for whatever reason.

      I don't know about any other country, but here in the UK you are required by law to leave at least six foot between your car and any cyclist you're overtaking, that is the approximately the space that a cyclist would need if they fell off their bike into the road. I'm sure that 99% of the drivers are completely unaware of this.

      Everyone wonders why more people don't cycle and I think one of the main reasons is that it is outright dangerous. Until there are more cycle routes that don't use roads, or drivers are more considerate towards cyclists, I don't think any more people will cycle to work.

    17. Re:how about a real bicycle? by TheTimoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And yes, I am a hippo crate (I do not bike every day)[...]
      I don't think anyone would expect a Hippo crate to ride the bike _any_ day, so don't worry :-).
      The word you're looking for is "hypocrite". I was just trying to picture that.
      SCNR

      --
      "Be careful or be roadkill" - Calvin
    18. Re:how about a real bicycle? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Motorcycles and scooters are more heavily regulated than pedal-bikes, and so pedal-bikes have a few advantages. First, you don't have to have insurance. That brings cost of ownership down a bit. Second, you're not exactly limited to streets. True, most municipalities don't let you ride on sidewalks, but there are numerous bike trails and stuff (at least, around here there are) that you can cut through for a nice ride and also get a shortcut. Third, you can actually get off the bike and take a crosswalk, periodically giving you a slight advantage at an intersection. Fourth, if you get tired, hit seriously adverse weather, or whatever, you can usually catch a bus.

      I've long considered using a pedal bike to get around many of the issues that face driving. But since I now work at home, I probably burn a hell of a lot less gas than even a pedal-bike commuter. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    19. Re:how about a real bicycle? by uss_valiant · · Score: 1
      However, I hope I'll reach my destination tomorrow in time: 170 km in 8 hours on a mountain bike :/
      I hope you have slick tires.
      That's the only reason why I believe that it will get very "close" - I'm riding with tires that have the highest, widest tread and the wheels are only 26". It's gonna be a pain for sure.
    20. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *skateboard* into work some days. No complaints, no sideways looks, no "for the love of all that is good and holy" yells at me.

      Say it with me, now: dee-oh-der-ant.

    21. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not only will you get the exercise, but you can still get a project out of it without the heavy motor/battery addition to the bike. For safe commuting, you need a good headlight (to be seen, not to see), and LED blinkies. I built a 12V 20W headlight system for myself with a sealed lead acid battery, and this year I'm going to add a good 12V car horn and regulate the voltage using a DC-DC converter for longer battery life.


      Find the Bikecurrent listserv and FAQ for things others have tried.

    22. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. I used to cycle (now, work is too far to try that), and I often see driversd get really, I mean really close to cyclists.

    23. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Skater · · Score: 2, Informative

      4. You don't have to ride through bad neighborhoods. A guy that rides to work (and takes a shower) told me a friend of his had his bike stolen out from under him...

      --RJ

    24. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Dalroth · · Score: 1

      But the people who have to sit next to you don't appreciate it.

      In shape, or not, smelly people suck.

      Bryan

    25. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      A lot of your smell has to do with what you eat.

      Most people who are very active tend to eat rather well.

      Sure, after 180K on the bike I tend to "reek" a bit, but usually I don't commute to work for over 100K and at least the last two places I worked they had showeres exactly because people biked in.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    26. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 3, Informative

      My solution to the passing problem is to be bold and ride in the middle of the lane, especially if there are two lanes.

      According to the highway traffic act here in Ontario (and I think all of Canada) a bike is "vehicle" and thus the lane is mine.

      I got into shouting matches about this with drivers, to a point where a cop was interested and told the guy if he doesn't shut up and move on he'll gonna ticket him for dangerous driving (he saw how the guy almost ran me off the road).

      Why do I take a whole lane? Because that way I have at least some "escape" room if need be.

      Interestingly enough, a lot of guys I know down in the states always tell me that they "ride on the shoulder" wherever they can or "squeese to the right" as to not be "hindering" the car traffic.

      Personally I give a shit about this, If I am already squeezing on the side they sure as hell won't respect me when passing, and most of the time people go the wide way around me, if they can't do it safely, then I guess they shouldn't pass at all.

      [rant off]

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    27. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      here in the UK you are required by law to leave at least six foot between your car and any cyclist you're overtaking, that is the approximately the space that a cyclist would need if they fell off their bike into the road.

      I've never heard of that law, although it may be in the Highway Code somewhere (much of the HC is *not* law). I agree with your sentiments though - I'm about 5 miles from work and the main disincentive to cycling is the attitude of drivers. It's not as if I'm lazy; I go out and ride after work instead when it's a bit quieter. I worked out that, riding defensively, I have a near-miss, usually being cut up by an artic or a van, about every 20-30 rides. I reckon I'd be dead if I rode every day for a year, and I have about 25 years' experience of main road cycling.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    28. Re:how about a real bicycle? by YaRness · · Score: 1

      who would notice? the difference between tokyo and most american cities is that deodorant in tokyo is optional.

      nothing smells better than the trains after work packed full of sweaty guys in cheap suits who just ran a 1/4 mile through the non-air-conditioned train station to get on the train.

      (well it does get worse, you could instead be on the smoking car on a shinkansen at the same time of day. or during rush hour in the morning, after staying up late drinking the night before your flight home. nothing beats standing room on the narita express near the smoking car when you're hungover and just ran through tokyo station to get to the train on time.)

    29. Re:how about a real bicycle? by CamMac · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I can't stand bikers... and its because of the stunts like that. Now, if your biking the speed limit, this doesn't apply. While I generally cruise above the speed limit, I'm not the kind of jackass to start yelling because I'm the only one speeding.

      However, when I'm on my way to school or work and a car is travelling 5-10mph below the speed limit I get pretty annoyed. So when its a biker who isn't hugging the curb, but instead taking up an entire lane, I reserve the right to get pissed.

      If your doing your part to ride the curb and allow people to pass, I'll do my part to pass you safely. Bikes and Cars can share the road.

      --Cam

      --
      All jocks think about is sports. All nerds think about is sex.
    30. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      isn't this the reason no-one liked gym class early in the day, in High School?

    31. Re:how about a real bicycle? by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      If you bikers have problems being recognized by vehicle drivers on the road, I can heavily recommend driving with the lights on. Speaking for the traffic situation in Europe, all motorbikers are required by law to always have their headlights on day and night, vehicle drivers are a lot more sensitive to anything on two wheels if it has its headlights on.

      Batteries add weight, generators add drag, but I think it's worth the effort. Because I personally dislike battery powered bike lights, I'd further recommend generator hubs, as they add a lot less drag than tire driven ones. You can write off both for increased muscle buildup, if you like ;)

      There's a good summary on quality bike lighting here, please don't mind that it's a bit focused on two manufacturers - strong bike headlights switched on even at daytime can save some situations. Myself, I'd prefer hub driven generators anytime over tire driven or battery powered lighting, because I'm too lazy to recharge the batteries ;)

    32. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      My only issue with that bullshit vehicle argument is that the bike is unable to maintain safe speed with other traffic.

    33. Re:how about a real bicycle? by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      The EBike can help shorted commutes which would otherwise be too long - for exactly the reason you mention.

      A peck of wash towels and a clean shirt etc will probably solve the problem if you keep the inbound ride - low key. On the way home feel free to open up.

      Another thing. If your roads are not people-centric the extra speed can improve safety by allowing you to cooexist in an occupied lane, rather than pissing of the swarms of SUV moms late for the nail painting appointment who will honk and accelerate past you to prove you're one lousy mother (*&^(*^ son of a bitch for clogging up the damn works with that beastial zero emmissions crap, when they usually scream through this 35 mph neighborhood at just under 55 mph, kids be damned.

      Been there

      AIK

    34. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guarentee you that every single one of the "idiot drivers" you mentioned said, later that day, "I'm just driving a long and this idiot bicyclist comes out of nowhere..."

      When biking, assume AT ALL TIMES that NO ONE CAN SEE YOU. You will suddenly find there are much fewer "idiot drivers" around you.

    35. Re:how about a real bicycle? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Shit is natural. Wiping is still a good idea.

      I don't think the OP was against biking at all. He was just asking for some consideration.

      It seems particularly odd to me that you use your displeasure with the offensive odors of others as an excuse to give off one of your own. Why not take the high-road and WASH YOUR ASS?

      -Peter

    36. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      You know,

      I initially thought I am a "good" citizen and ride on the side, as to not "impede the guy in the SUV who tries to drink his coffee and eat a donught on his stressful way to work."

      That lasted until I got almost hit a couple of times with their mirrors because they "drifted" to the right as some jelly of their donught had dropped on their suit.

      Or this one time where a woman dreamingly first seem to take the other lane to overtake me only to all of the sudden run me into the ditch without even noticing, as I caught her at the next traffic light and asked what that was all about she claimed she didn't see me (I am 6'2" for crying out loud and by far not hard to see).

      Point is: I really don't care if you are two minutes later at work, if you're running late then get up earlier, but the "stunts" I am playing make it safer for ME and as I don't have a couple of thousand pounds of metal around my ass to "protect" (or trap) me I have to make sure you are aware that *I* am there. I don't have any passive safety, only active one, and the best for me is to be clearly seen, even by the donught and coffee drinking SUV driver.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    37. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      "Safe speed"? Safe speed is in the city at most 50kph, granted I can't keep that up for a very long time but the majority of the time you only race from traffic light to traffic light.

      If I am out of town in the open country road then there is enough space for you to get around me.

      I am not talking about riding on the highway where you go 100+kph, and in the city you ALWAYS need to drive in a way that allows you to stop if a kid runs out on the street, speed limit or not. So your argument really doesn't apply.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    38. Re:how about a real bicycle? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Here's something to keep in mind though:

      You can be right, and you can be dead right.

      You really want to take the high and mighty road when your chance of winning if someone else doesn't agree is essentially zero?

      I have know 5 people over my life that have died road biking. I'm not quite 30. I don't know as many people that have died in CARS for chrissakes.

      If I HAVE to ride on the road, I ride on the shoulder. No, not the last 6 inches of pavement. I mean almost in the field kind of thing.

      Whatever turns your crank, whatever you're comfortable with, but watch it OK? Chances are DAMNED good that you are going to get hit with an attitude like that. The cops aren't usually around to stop an accident before it happens, they're usually there to scrape you into a bucket afterwards. Sure, the guy that hits you will go to jail, but what good'll that do you at that point?

      --
      No Comment.
    39. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the concern.

      I did ride on the side initially unti I realized that suddenly people thought they could pass me without even going a bit to the left. Since then I am smack in the middle.

      The chances of being overlooked or hit are decreasing amazingly. What I also noticed is that people started going WIDER around me than before.

      I tell you, it makes one feel special when you feel the right mirror of a Monster SUV whistle right next to your ear because the punk kid at the wheel has no clue how wide his fucking SUV is.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    40. Re:how about a real bicycle? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Tough. Bikes have right of way over cars. Pedestrians have right of way over bikes and cars.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    41. Re:how about a real bicycle? by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      I appreciate that you want to pass me safely, I really do.

      That said, think of me like a slow-moving vehicle. Think of me like a street cleaner. Or a garbage truck. Something that is going under the speed limit that takes a minute or two of your time and then is gone.

      Also keep in mind the idea that hugging the curb may mean hugging the line of parked cars, and I don't know about you, but the thought of getting doored (having someone open their car door into my path) is not very pleasant. I try to leave a couple of feet between me and parked cars when I can, and am very aware of what cars have people in them and what don't.

    42. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      I can reccomend this approach. I have LED lamps front and rear, so the battery weight is not much of an issue. When I drive, I find cyclists who use these types of lamps to be very visible.

      The front lamp is 3 blue-white LEDs powered by 3x aaa batteries, and the rear is a 5 red LED unit that takes 2x aaa.

      I use them in flash mode to get the most attention. I've found that because they use so little power, I use them much more frequently than I did my incandescant lamps.

      I live in one of, if not the, most heavily biked cities in the US. I've been hit by cars twice, both times on the campus of the university where I work, both times in fine weather, at ~17:15. The take home message is that drivers are not very careful, they don't pay attention, and they have no idea what the rules of the road are. Cyclists have to make every effort they can to be conspicuous, so that even the most distracted soccer mom in her behemoth SUV will notice you. And wear your helmet!

    43. Re:how about a real bicycle? by nanter · · Score: 1

      Remember, he's no longer employed. :-)

    44. Re:how about a real bicycle? by bfields · · Score: 1
      However, when I'm on my way to school or work and a car is travelling 5-10mph below the speed limit I get pretty annoyed. So when its a biker who isn't hugging the curb, but instead taking up an entire lane, I reserve the right to get pissed.

      There are a lot of ways you can "take the lane", even when going significantly below the speed limit, without slowing people down much:

      • Stick mostly to roads with at least 2 lanes in your direction, and people can usually pass with at most a few seconds' delay in all but the most congested traffic.
      • As a fallback, in the worst case, you can always just pull over every now and then to let past any traffic that's piling up behind you.

      There really are a lot of situations where "taking the lane" is the best thing to do, for all involved: on narrow lanes when there isn't space to share side-by-side anyway; when there's street parking and you don't want to get "doored"; when you're getting ready to make a left turn and want to move over gradually instead of swerving left at the last minute; etc.

      I don't want to cause anyone huge delays, but in every case where I've have someone complain about me holding them up, they've been slowed by at most 4 or 5 seconds. If that kind of thing is really happenning to you a lot, complain to your local traffic engineers---that's a case when a bike lane might make sense. Don't complain to the cyclist--they're probably just trying to get from point A to point B like everyone else.

      --Bruce Fields

    45. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time in my life I rode my bike in the middle of MY lane. I stopped when I realized how CRAZY ANGERY a FEW of my tailgaters were about it; to the point I had NO trouble visualizing them bumping me from behind. I've never broken a bone and I'm keeping it that way. I also like a face without skid marks.

      Put "I was in the RIGHT god damn it !!" on your tombstone.

      No, really, count the nummber of people who pass you then choose a percentage of drivers you think are vicious, criminal, hair-trigger maniacs, etc.

      one in 300 are nuts enough to run you over? and 300 pass you in a given week? What do YOU think your odds are???

    46. Re:how about a real bicycle? by bfischer · · Score: 1

      I think "Hippo crate" was humor

    47. Re:how about a real bicycle? by bfields · · Score: 1
      You really want to take the high and mighty road when your chance of winning if someone else doesn't agree is essentially zero?

      The problem with that argument is that it presumes you would be safer if you didn't take the lane. There is evidence, however, that taking the lane is actually the safer option in many cases.

      Here's one summary of research, mainly on the related issue of choosing between roads and sidepaths--but it does at least call in to question the idea that you reduce the chance of accidents by staying out of traffic lanes.

      --Bruce Fields

    48. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a biker, and I can't stand assholes like you. I also ride in the center of the lane. Because when I do, people pass me at a safe distance. If I'm hugging the curb, they'll think they can pass me without moving to the left at all. And if I see a pothole, I certainly can't dodge it to the left, or they'll hit me for sure. It's absolutely unsafe to hug the curb.

    49. Re:how about a real bicycle? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      I really do not need statistics to tell me that if I stay off the road, I will likely NOT be hit by a road travelling vehicle.

      In other words, sure, it may be safer when travelling on a road, to stick to an actual lane, but it's all relative. Staying off the road is the safest, period.

      This is why I am a cross-country mountain biker. Maybe twice a year do I end up having to ride on the road, and when I do, I'm NEVER actually on the road when there are any vehicles near. Even then, there is always a chance that some tool may careen off the road and into me on the shoulder. Not likely, but it has, and does happen.

      So again, nice stats, but they don't exactly make me feel warm and fuzzy about riding on the road in any way.

      --
      No Comment.
    50. Re:how about a real bicycle? by mysticgoat · · Score: 3, Informative

      So when its a biker who isn't hugging the curb, but instead taking up an entire lane, I reserve the right to get pissed.

      I hope your license is taken away from you before you kill someone.

      When you are driving any car, you are operating machinery that has more lethal potential and more difficult to control than any modern firearm. It is dangerous to give firearms to people who get pissed easily; people who cannot control their emotions are even more dangerous in a motor vehicle. They account for a big portion of the highway death toll in the USA, since the state of being pissed is a very accident prone state. You should not be driving when you are pissed. There are anger control clinics available-- you should take advantage of one of them.

      In all the states where I have bicycled, it is legal for a bicyclist to "claim the lane"-- and the law requires him to do so when it is unsafe to do otherwise. A bicyclist in the middle of a narrow lane is safer than one who hugs the shoulder because he is more visible, because he causes other traffic to slow down to a speed that is safe for the current conditions, and because he is not encouraging drivers who maybe are poor at safety assessments to attempt to pass without changing lanes.

      Good bicyclists minimize this practice through route planning and being courteous in using turnout opportunities when those are safely available. That does not mean weaving in and out of parked cars-- which is a dangerous habit.

      Bicyclists are another slow moving vehicle, like farm equipment, metermaid threewheelers, and drivers rubbernecking for an address. Of course you probably get pissed at these other legal users of the road, too. Get some anger management before you end up carrying a sack of guilt around.

    51. Re: how about a real bicycle? by gidds · · Score: 1

      I take your point. But here in the UK an awful lot of roads don't have more than one lane in each direction. Would you moderate your policy here?

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    52. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Koatdus · · Score: 1
      Everyone wonders why more people don't cycle and I think one of the main reasons is that it is outright dangerous. Until there are more cycle routes that don't use roads, or drivers are more considerate towards cyclists, I don't think any more people will cycle to work.


      Riders have to take some of the blame. Every morning on my way to work I see cylers who pook along in the middle of the lane, (hey if you can't keep up with the traffic you need to be over to the side) or don't signal turns, or run red lights, or weave through traffic or ride on the wrong side of the road, or ride on the sidewalk. When I ride I obey the traffic laws as if I was on a motercycle.

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    53. Re:how about a real bicycle? by really? · · Score: 1

      Deodorant optional? I think not. (This is not the place to get into why and how the Japanese are way cleaner than must of us "whities", but, as far as deodorant goes I find quite the opposite of what you say.)
      Anyhow, to me, the morning trains smell worse than the evening ones. I am a "morning shower" person - bath/shower at the gym at night - so to me the Japanese tradition of bathing only at night is not natural. I just can't make myself get out of bet wash my face, throw on some deodorant and head for the station. I need to wash off the night's sweat. On the evening trains however, we all stink the same. :-)

      Mind you, that's another reason why I ride my bike to work instead of taking the train.

      As for the shinkansen ... dude, do I feel your pain. It's just amazing that almost always there are open seats on the smoking cars but not on the non-smoking ones. Would this not make business sense to have more, or ALL, non smoking cars? EVERYTIME I had no choice but to take a sit in a smoking car I have heard people around me bitch about not being able to get sits on a non-smoking car. EVERYTIME.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    54. Re: how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Depends on the road, if it is narrow and there would be no way that they could pass me safely: No, if the road would allow for it (and I know they would do it in a safe manner) yes of course.

      I drive a car myself, but when I pass someoneon the bike I only do it if I could also overtake a car in it's spot.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    55. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      You tell that to St. Peter when you see him, which given your attitude will be sooner rather than later.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    56. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Koatdus · · Score: 1

      If you can not keep up with the speed limit you should not be on that road. Stay in the residential streets (25mph) until you are in good enough shape to keep up with the traffic. Doesn't matter how right you are if you are dead.

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    57. Re:how about a real bicycle? by slamb · · Score: 1
      I also ride out farther from the curb. I generally don't ride as far as the middle of the lane (unless I'm riding side-by-side with someone else), but I'll always be at least a quarter of the way out. There's nothing worse than having an idiot driver only a few inches away from hitting you with his mirror on one side, the curb a few inches away on the other, and a giant pothole coming up. So I ensure that never happens.

      There are a couple other good reasons to ride farther out into the lane:

      • It makes you more noticeable to oncoming traffic. Behind hit from behind is what most people worry about, but statistically, it's less likely to happen than seeing the car that hit you. Typically, they're turning and cut you off, not realizing that bikes go faster than 10 mph.
      • Being farther away from parked cars reduces your risk of being doored.

      Also, if I'm not using up the whole lane when I'm riding, I certainly do when I stop at the lights. Even if there's a bike lane, I'll often pull out of it so no car pulls up alongside. Cars do dangerous things when they start out alongside me; they'll pull just barely ahead of me and turn, cutting me off. Plus, you're naturally a bit wobbly when you're starting out, shifting your balance and clipping in to the pedals. Not a good time to have less space than usual.

      I took a bicycle touring class last semester (hey, free credit hour) and they recommended doing this also. It really works - use up more of the lane and cars will realize they should be moving outside of the lane to pass you.

      And to the people who say this is more dangerous - I don't believe that. The Crash-Type Manual For Bicyclists says in the "Motorist Overtaking - Misjudging Passing Space" that "almost 1 out of 5 bicyclists were on the shoulder or in a bike lane." That seems out of proportion to me. People rarely ride on the shoulder (see below) and bicycle lanes aren't that common.

      As far as riding on the shoulder goes, no one actually does that around here. First of all, it doesn't even apply to in-town riding - there is no shoulder. Secondly, outside town the shoulder is usually a really crappy surface. I'm not taking my road bike on that.

    58. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Every morning on my way to work I see cylers who pook along in the middle of the lane, (hey if you can't keep up with the traffic you need to be over to the side)

      I'm sorry, but that's just not true. What part of 'sharing' the road do you not understand? Sharing does not mean 'I get the garbage part of the road you don't want to use'. Construction, left turners, and pedestrian crosswalks slow you down too, and that's not their fault, it's just how the rules of the road work. Suck it up, you're the one with the problem, not them.

    59. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Gee, that sounds relaxing...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    60. Re:how about a real bicycle? by webgit · · Score: 1

      ...don't signal turns, or run red lights, or weave through traffic or ride on the wrong side of the road, or ride on the sidewalk.

      I agree, there are a lot of idiot cyclists out there as well as idiot drivers. I see them all the time. For some reason there is a number of cyclists that, for whatever reason, don't think the Highway Code applies to them. Especially at red lights, everyone stops for the red light and then this lone cyclist pedals out across the pedestrian crossing, or into the middle of the junction.

      They don't think they have to indicate just before they swerve across the road to ride up the wrong side for a bit.

      However, they are just stupid, and are generally only putting their own lives at risk, althought there may be a few drivers that object to the dent that a cyclist would make in their car!

    61. Re:how about a real bicycle? by TheTimoo · · Score: 1

      Now that you mention it.. I guess I'm stupid...

      --
      "Be careful or be roadkill" - Calvin
    62. Re:how about a real bicycle? by bfields · · Score: 1
      I really do not need statistics to tell me that if I stay off the road, I will likely NOT be hit by a road travelling vehicle.

      In your case, where you take "off the road" to actually mean in the wilderness, yes, of course.

      But many people use the identical argument to persuade themselves that they would be better off on, say, a sidewalk next to a busy road than actually in the road, and then they get in a nasty accident in the next crosswalk. (This Palo Alto study and this survey of LAB members are two examples of evidence for higher accident risk for sidepaths than for roads.)

      This is why I am a cross-country mountain biker.

      OK. Though in the case of someone cycling for transportation, this isn't really an option....

      Also, though this is something I don't have real evidence for, I think there are likely to be differences between the risks encountered on typical recreational road cyclists' routes (rural highways, traffic rare but fast) and typical commuters' routes (more complex traffic patterns but somewhat slower, possibly more awake drivers). For what it's worth, I'm personally much more comfortable with the latter....

      --Bruce Fields

    63. Re:how about a real bicycle? by YaRness · · Score: 1

      i forgot about the bathe-at-night thing, maybe it's more that than deodorant. and the lack of air conditioning.

      plus you get all sweaty playing grab-ass on the train :o

    64. Re:how about a real bicycle? by ssuther · · Score: 1
      I can't stand bikers... and its because of the stunts like that. ... I'm not the kind of jackass to start yelling ... So when its a biker who isn't hugging the curb, but instead taking up an entire lane, I reserve the right to get pissed.


      It sounds like you are precisely that kind of jackass...

      I'm a cyclist and I don't feel the way you do about drivers. However, if you want to spend a portion of your day sitting in your coffin pissed off at the world, more power to you. Just try to leave the rest of us out of it.
    65. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 1
      Gee, that sounds relaxing...


      I can relax when I am dead ;)
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    66. Re:how about a real bicycle? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      I see where you're coming from, and that makes sense. I have to agree that I am also somewhat more comfortable riding on streets in urban settings...sort of. I've been hit 3 times in my life in urban settings, and I'm still alive. Actually, no major damage of any kind so I'm quite lucky. (Can't say so much about a couple of my bikes) I attribute this entirely to a couple of things: a) That the vehicles were moving relatively slowly and b) that I always saw the imminent collision in time to be prepared.

      These wouldn't hold out in the country. Driving fast, and I wouldn't likely see it coming.

      Anyways, my comfort level is currently just not riding bicycles around motorized vehicles at all. All it takes is one idiot to end your life, and I'm personally not willing to take that risk. North American travel is pretty much motor-vehicle centric unfortunately. (Mostly out of necessity)

      I find it interesting actually that some of the safest urban environments to ride a bicycle in are actually some of the most densly populated. I'm quite certain I'd have no problem riding a bike around in urban centers in Japan for example.

      --
      No Comment.
    67. Re:how about a real bicycle? by zardinuk · · Score: 0

      I can't stand when a bicyclist is in the right 25% of the lane, and you can't tell whether he is trying to avoid traffic or if he's actually using the lane, so you move to pass him and he swerves out into the middle of the lane like a maniac, nearly gives you a heart attack and you slam your brakes and swerve into the opposing traffic, rolling your mini-van and killing your entire family.

      It's especially bothersome when there is a decent sized shoulder. I tend to make a game of seeing how close I can get to the shoulder without hitting gravel.

      A funny story: there is a huge downhill section of road near my house, and one day I pulled out to make a left turn and a guy on a bike is coming down the road at 50MPH or something, I had my window down and he screamed bloody murder like nothing I've ever heard before. It wouldn't have been so funny if he'd have hit me (well maybe) but jesus, if you value your life don't go down a hill that fast on a 15 lb piece of aluminum.

      --

      "What the superior man seeks is in himself; what the small man seeks is in others."
      - Confucius

    68. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I found, in Oregon, cycling was a mixed blessing. In the morning, at 7am, it is a joy... Nice and cool, very little traffic. At 5pm, the heat, the dust, and the traffic (bikers are invisible to cars around here, since they move faster than a pedestrian and are smaller than a motorcycle), turn it into a living hell. Plus, after working all day, who wants to "work" some more biking home?

      The ideal solution for me would be to bike to work, and get a ride home (with the bike). Bus transportation around here sometimes carries bikes, but it's not guaranteed. Also, the buses run twice an hour (if you're lucky) and what would take 15 minutes by car takes roughly 2 hours by bus (due to switching busses at two stops and waiting for the schedules to coincide).

    69. Re:how about a real bicycle? by whookey · · Score: 1

      I think there is a common misconception that there exists a one-to-one relationship between exercise and smelling bad. I usually shower in the morning before leaving, wear deoderant most days, don't work up a huge sweat, and wear fresh clothes at work. I've been told that I actually smell good :), most of the time it's absolutely neutral. The times I've most often noticed that I smell a bit 'off' is after I've been sitting around in front of a computer for a long day or two, drinking coffee, and generally _not_ moving around getting exercise. I love bicycling.

      --
      somebody bent my whookey.
    70. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It blows my mind at how many idiot posters and moderators took what I said exactly the wrong way.

      THANK YOU for actually reading what I wrote, and not trying to twist it into some slag against Biking / Exercise / Whatever.

      The OPer - posting anonymously because one invariably gets modded down when pointing out the idiocy of certain moderations.

    71. Re:how about a real bicycle? by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1
      My solution to the passing problem is to be bold and ride in the middle of the lane, especially if there are two lanes.

      I used to drive that way, until a cop pulled me over (yes, on a bicycle!) and explained that Virginia State Code forbids bicyclists from riding in the middle of the lane or otherwise impeding traffic flow.

      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    72. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He he, I am a driver and I got four bikers like you off the road by now by just touching their wheels gently with my 20 inch rims.

    73. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Rheingold · · Score: 1

      There are also a lot of idiot cyclists who don't let pedestrians know they're there. All it takes is a $5 bell and the gumption to use it and we'd all get along a little better. I can be heard dinging all around town...

      --
      Wil
      wiki
    74. Re:how about a real bicycle? by tmortn · · Score: 1

      In many places it is unrealistic to take an alternate route due to cul-de sac neighborhoods and traffic choke points. These realities can force cyclists to have to contend with major arteries and major intersections if they want to commute to work on a bike.

      For example in the relatively small city I live now ( Huntsville Al. ) I would love to ride to work but having to cross a 6-8 lanes of highway on 4 lane overpasses with entrance and exit ramps posted at 55mph makes it a very dangerous proposition. There are no alternative routes except one underpass which is several miles out of the way. Not a big deal when driving but a time consuming one when atempting to bike.

      So while the point I need to get to is about 3 miles away by car, in order to take a low traffic route and not have to contend with a high speed merging traffic overpass I would have to travle almost 8-10 ( depending on the route ) to get to it. Then I would still have about 3 miles more to go since the key point I have to get to is the entrance to an army base.

      Course its all academic since there is no such thing as a safe street to ride a bike on around here.... people think anyone on a bike without at least 1000cc's of displacement are mentally unbalanced and should be removed from the gene pool immediately.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    75. Re:how about a real bicycle? by bodrell · · Score: 1
      There're a couple twits in my office that do this (Bike to work every day as exercies).

      You can pick them out easily, because they end up smelling up the place.

      For the sake of all that is good and holy, DO NOT bike into work unless you intend to SHOWER when you get there.

      I sympathize with you having to be around smelly people, but the reason they smell bad is not because they don't shower when they arrive. Sweat doesn't smell bad (not to me, at least, or to most people). It's the junk produced by bacteria that grow in sweat that stinks.

      I use one of those rock crystals for deodorant. It is NOT an antiperspirant, but it doesn't claim to be. It DOES inhibit bacterial growth, thus working better than the standard fragrant type. I get sweaty as hell biking to work, but I either dry off in ten minutes (if I don't change my shirt) or I put on a clean, dry shirt and I'm fine.

      I live in Eugene, Oregon--one of the hippy capitals of the world. There are more miles of bike trails here than of highway. Bicyclists are a unique demographic that includes a disproportionate percentage of hippies, among other things. I suspect these "twits" who stink up your workplace would probably smell bad even if they didn't bike, because a lot of the people who like biking also like patchouli and dreadlocks and bathing only occasionally. I guess I'm saying that correlation is not causation. How do you know it's the biking that makes them smell bad? Maybe they just have poor hygiene in general, exacerbated by biking into work.

      (Disclaimer: not all hippies wear patchouli or dreadlocks, and some of them have excellent hygiene.)

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    76. Re:how about a real bicycle? by bodrell · · Score: 1
      I can't stand bikers... and its because of the stunts like that. Now, if your biking the speed limit, this doesn't apply. While I generally cruise above the speed limit, I'm not the kind of jackass to start yelling because I'm the only one speeding.

      You do realize this is total flamebait, right? Saying you can't stand bikers because of the "stunts" that some of them pull. Cars try to pass bicyclists even if it doesn't make sense. Where I live, I can easily go faster than cars on residential streets and downtown. I'll have a car behind me while I'm at a stop sign, and when I start to go the car behind me often guns it and tries to overtake me--only to stop at the next stop sign, at the next block. It's even more frustrating since bikes here are allowed to yield at stop signs without necessarily stopping, so I can keep pedalling for several blocks while the car behind me has to come to a complete stop at any intersection. Even worse is the "right hook" (see collision type #4), where the car overtakes you only to turn right, cutting you off and potentially killing you.

      However, when I'm on my way to school or work and a car is travelling 5-10mph below the speed limit I get pretty annoyed. So when its a biker who isn't hugging the curb, but instead taking up an entire lane, I reserve the right to get pissed.

      Laws depend on where you live, but in Texas the law was that bicyclists can take any lane less than 15 ft wide. Honestly, an SUV cannot safely pass a biker when the lane is narrower than 15 ft. And although someone already made this comment, hugging the right side of the lane can be damn dangerous when there is a line of parked cars. A friend of mine tore her ACL when some jackass opened his car door without looking. She was riding in a bike lane, too.

      I'm responding to you rather than flaming because you obviously don't know the perils of bicycling with cars around. Read through that bike safety site I linked too--these types of collisions are how bicyclists get killed.

      On the other hand, I'm not defending irresponsible bikers, such as the ones that go the wrong way down one-way streets, or blow through stop signs when traffic is coming, or bike at night without blinkers.

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    77. Re:how about a real bicycle? by drew · · Score: 1

      Another thing that i would add to your bullet list:

      - it reduces the chances of hitting a pedestrian who steps out in front of you.

      i noticed riding my bike around chicago that not only do most cars not see you or realize that you are moving greater than 5-10 mph, but most pedestrians dont either. i have had several people step out in front of me in to cross the street, even after looking straight at me. in busy cities with lots of cars parked on the shoulder it is sometimes impossible to see these pedestrians until they actually enter the street, and i have had to slam my brakes hard several times to avoid hitting them.

      yes, i know that they have the right of way, and i would happily stop for them if they gave me the chance. but most people i know would not blindly step out into the street when a car is coming along at 20 mph, they need to realize that a bike traveling at 20 mph is little different...

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    78. Re:how about a real bicycle? by greed · · Score: 1
      The lane is yours if there is more than one lane. Otherwise you (and I) need to be "as close as practicable" to the right hand curb or edge of the roadway. (The roadway does not include the shoulder, paved or soft.) (And, I looked it up, practicable is a real word!)

      There's a huge section of the Ontario Highway Traffic Act called "Rules of the Road" which is seriously under-enforced these days. Traffic flow and safety would improve a whole lot if it was. But you can't do it with a radar gun or a camera, so we probably won't see any improvements there.

      Now, if something can be done about bicyclists which pass on the right of right-turning vehicles... I've never really understood what those people are thinking. "Let me ride into this truck's blind spot, he'll somehow just know I'm there and stop again"?

    79. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Koatdus · · Score: 1

      When I am driving over the mountains in my inlaws moterhome I pull over and let people by every chance I get. In places where it is legal I use the shoulder. To do otherwise is just plain selfish.

      I repeat my position that if you can not keep up to the speed limit you should be over to the side.

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    80. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over it. For godsake, real men smell, I don't know what kinda Frito-Lay's product you reek of, but myself. I ride a street bike (IRONHORSE Triumph to be exact) nearly everyday, to work, then school, then back to work and home. All in all it's 26 miles. I might smell a little, but then again, humans tend to. Get yourself some smelling salts or something.

    81. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Suidae · · Score: 1

      one of the main reasons is that it is outright dangerous

      Don't forget that biking on a heavily traveled road exposes you to very high levels of pollutants, and you will be breathing very deeply.

      There was a study a few years ago concerning this, I don't recall the details, but I think the conclusion was that the blood levels of carbon monoxide and other pollutants was something like 10 times higher in cyclists than the motorists, and the levels persisted for several hours after the ride.

    82. Re:how about a real bicycle? by jci · · Score: 1

      I use a street that has a wide right lane, but I ALWAYS take the lane at a light because drivers will unsafely cut me off to make a right turn. If I am in the middle of the lane, they can't just try to weave past me. Staying closer to the center near driveways/uncontrolled cross streets also helps to combat the very common accident involving the "California stop." I'm doing it for my safety, not to inconvience you.

    83. Re:how about a real bicycle? by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      what impedes flow more - one bike taking a third of a lane? or an ambulance, a couple cop cars, a dozen motorists, some police tape, and a pile of goop on the pavement?

    84. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't even know bicycles were alowed on the road. Learn something new every day.

    85. Re:how about a real bicycle? by dirtstar · · Score: 0

      Well, technically you can take the middle of the lane, under the correct conditions...

      Va. Code Ann. 46.2-905

      Any person operating a bicycle, electric personal assistive mobility device, electric power-assisted bicycle, or moped on a roadway at less than the normal speed of traffic at the time and place under conditions then existing shall ride as close as safely practicable to the right curb or edge of the roadway, except under any of the following circumstances:

      1. When overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction;

      2. When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway;

      3. When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, parked or moving vehicles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards, or substandard width lanes that make it unsafe to continue along the right curb or edge;

      4. When avoiding riding in a lane that must turn or diverge to the right; and

      5. When riding upon a one-way road or highway, a person may also ride as near the left-hand curb or edge of such roadway as safely practicable.

      --
      I want to walk the Earth and kick ass where needed, like Cain from the TV show Kung-Fu.
    86. Re:how about a real bicycle? by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1
      what impedes flow more - one bike taking a third of a lane? or an ambulance, a couple cop cars, a dozen motorists, some police tape, and a pile of goop on the pavement?

      At this time I am unwilling to go to jail on that particular point of contention.

      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    87. Re:how about a real bicycle? by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1
      VA Code: ... bicycle ... to the right ... except ... 1 ... 2 ... 3 ... 4 ... 5 ...

      All of which means that I'm allowed (even encouraged!) to dart in-and-out of traffic, unless I can keep up with the 50mph traffic in the 35mph (2-lane) zone.

      Or the 35mph traffic in a 25mph (1-lane) zone.

      Or I can stay home and collect welfare.

      To his credit, the cop was sympathetic, and agreed that traveling in the middle of the lane is probably safer, but somebody had called in a complaint and he was obligated to respond.

      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    88. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      Amen brotha. Like we leaned in drivers' ed, if your vehicle can't do the speed limit on a given road, you shouldn't be using it on that road. Slow bicyclists shound find routes with speed limits they can keep up with, without inconveniencing everyone else who needs to get somewhere.

      Roads are for transportation. Gyms are for exercise. I think many bicyclists should learn the difference.

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    89. Re:how about a real bicycle? by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      I cycled to work dailiy until recently (I fell off a horsse, but thats another story - I'm getting better slowly thanks).
      And the good news is ...
      in Sydney (yes, Australia not Canada), new buildings must supply "adequate" changing facilities. So we get a shower and a change room. So I ride to work in bike gear, then shower and change into a suit (yes it IS possible to carry one in a bag and not crush it - use those neat new non-iron shirts!).

      So the moral is - move to Sydney and don't ride horses.

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    90. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do the same - I take a whole lane....
      Im doing the right thing... saving resources, keeping myself fuit - so Ill be less drain on the future health systems and just generally taking up less space... SO I feel i have more right to the lane....

      Unlike some governments ATM - might is NOT right ....

    91. Re:how about a real bicycle? by CamMac · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is my responce to everyone who replied to my realy post. It is in two parts, the response to the rational people. And a response to the two flamebaiters. This is also my last response. I will continue to read responses, but unless its really insightful and begs for a reply, I'm not going to waste anymore time on Slashdot.

      RATIONAL

      For the rational people, a rational response. I wish I could name you, but most of the responses where rational.

      I am not referring to any biker that can keep the speed limit. Roads are there to provide a means for getting from point A to point B quickly. And there are a lot of other people with whom you have to share the road. Yes there are slow moving vehicles. However, even slow moving vehicles respect the need of everyone else to get somewhere quickly. Except for grandma, and she's going to lose her license anyway. Tractors never get on the highway during high volume times. Street cleaners only operate a night when the traffic is low.

      Where I live (Boulder/Denver area), there are a large number of bike lanes and sidewalks. It is easy to ride a bike from anywhere to anywhere without impeding regular traffic. Yet some bikers, the ones who piss me off, refuse to accept the fact they are not a part of the regular flow of traffic. When the speed limit is 40mph, get on the sidewalk. Especially during high volume times. Don't expect that because the law gives you the right to be on the road, that not a right to cause problems.

      Personally, because my area has a large number of bike trails, lanes, and sidewalks, and because we still have bikers who hog lanes and ride between lanes, I feel that we (locally) should ban bikes from the roads. They are a safety hazard. The only ones who get hurt are the bikers, but the only ones who get blamed are the drivers.

      FLAMEBAIT
      Mysticgoat
      I hope your license is taken away from you before you kill someone.

      I'm sorry that you live in a culture where people act upon all emotion without control. Where I come from, it is expected for people to act rationally regardless of state of mind.

      swv3752
      Tough. Bikes have right of way over cars. Pedestrians have right of way over bikes and cars.

      So because you have the right, you abuse the right? Way to go. That is the attitude that pisses me off.

      Oh, and I do hope that no one who has taken the attitude of "I'm doing it my way, and everyone else can suffer" will never argue against second hand smoke, pollution, or anything else in which someone's actions indirectly effect you. We all live here, and we need to live together. This goes for the inconsiderate drivers as well, Mr. AC with the 20 inch rims.

      --Cam
      PS Sorry for the responses to the flamebait, but one of them got to a mod+5 and I had to say something.

      --
      All jocks think about is sports. All nerds think about is sex.
    92. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Morden · · Score: 1

      Gotta agree with the above comment.

      Having not ridden a bike for years until 2003/2004, the first thing I asked when I bought my bike was how I should handle road-riding.

      I was told that my bike's a "wheeled vehicle" and is thus entitled to a lane according to the road rules here (Victoria, Australia).

      It's a bit of give and take ... usually drivers don't bother me, and I usually don't need too much space in the lane anyway. But its nice that they change lanes to avoid me. (Maybe its the rifle ;))

      I find that in the city, where people are used to couriers etc people are pretty good about staying far out of my way. The problem is when you take those sensibilities to the suburbs. I've had verbal altercations with motorists in the suburbs over it -- in the end, its not worth the argument (and the smack around the ears with the crowbar).

      And yeah, I get concerned when I'm riding on the road-side of parked cars with cars passing me.

      Did I have a point or did I just ramble.....

    93. Re:how about a real bicycle? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      (Hey, CamMac, your personal rating system appears to be out of synch with slashdot's. At least with respect to "flamebait". Just thought you might want to know that.) :^)

      Being pissed is somewhere along the continuum between being placid and being in a rage. Some of the physiological changes that accompany rage include:

      • loss of peripheral vision-- "tunnel vision";
      • diminished hearing;
      • an increase in strength of the larger muscles, with
      • a simultaneous loss in fine motor control, which leads to
      • a decrease in the capability for coordinated, precision reactions;
      • a decrease in the ability to reason

      These do not a good driver make.

      While I'm sure that being pissed is not as severe as being enraged, someone who is pissed is more likely to miss seeing or hearing something, and more likely to make a bad judgment call than when he is alert and relaxed. He is more accident prone.

      Okay, right now you are probably in a pissed state, and therefore not receptive to what I've got to say-- this post might seem like just so much more flamebait to you. It isn't, nor was my first post. Maybe if you come back to read these when you're panties aren't in a bunch, you'll see that.

      It is true that I'm playing hardball here, but I'm justified in that. For I am a bicyclist who hopes one day to tour through Colorado, and your attitude, sir, is a lethal threat to me.

    94. Re:how about a real bicycle? by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Everyone wonders why more people don't cycle and I think one of the main reasons is that it is outright dangerous.

      You sound like a responsible cyclist. Here in the States, cyclists are supposed to follow the rules of the road and also be protected by them. However, many cyclists here seem to want to be superior to auto traffic: they want the same rights accorded to them as cars, but they wish to ride right through traffic lights and to proceed at whatever speed they can, weaving through cars if necessary. I have been putting off the purchase of a good bicycle, both because of the expense of a good one and because of the contempt bike riders and auto drivers appear to hold for each other. I don't live in an area with a lot of bike trails or safe places to ride, unfortunately. I'm thinking I'll just get a cheap BMX-ripoff and make like an idiot trying to emulate X-gamers. At least it looks like fun, and I probably won't get creamed on my cul-de-sac. Hopefully.

    95. Re:how about a real bicycle? by sean5008 · · Score: 1
      You are incorrect and in violation of the Ontario Highway traffic act.

      Bicycles are recognized as vehicles in the Government of Ontario's Highway Traffic Act. All traffic regulations for motorized vehicles and their operators apply equally to bicycles. In addition to these there are further laws that apply specifically to bicycles. Here is a summary of these.

      Bicycles overtaken &/or traveling slower than normal traffic: Any vehicle moving slower than the normal traffic speed shall drive in the right-hand lane, or "as close as practicable to the right" edge of the road, except when preparing to turn left or when passing another vehicle according to Section 147. Furthermore, section 148(6) states: every person on a bicycle or motor assisted bicycle who is overtaken by a vehicle traveling at a greater speed shall turn out to the right and allow the vehicle to pass and the vehicle overtaking shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary to avoid a collision. Passing motorist should also be aware that every person in charge of a vehicle on a highway meeting a person travelling on a bicycle shall allow the cyclist sufficient room on the roadway to pass as per section 148(4).

      Slow moving vehicles: Contrary to one persons assertion that you can liken your bicycle to a garbage truck or street cleaner, a bike is not considered to be a slow moving vehicle under the highway traffic act. If you were considered a "slow moving vehicle" there are a whole slew of additional laws regulating their operation including the display of a caution sign.

      Cycling on Shoulders: Although Section 150 prohibits motorists in most circumstances from driving on shoulders, cyclists are subject to no such restriction. However, by using the shoulder cyclists are deemed to have left the roadway, and must yield right of way to vehicles on the roadway before returning to it.

      Riding in pedestrian crossover prohibited: Section 140 (6) specifies that no person shall ride a bicycle across a roadway within a pedestrian crossover.

      Passing other Vehicles: Section 148(5) requires drivers of vehicles (including cyclists) to overtake on the left.

      Hand/Arm Signals: Section 142 requires cyclists to use hand/arm signals if a turning or stopping cyclist affects the operation of another vehicle. There are two permitted signals for a right turn. The right arm horizontal signal; the other right turn signal is the left arm out horizontally, elbow bent and forearm and hand extended vertically.

      Lighting: Section 62 (17) requires lighting equipment to be used one half hour before sunset and one half hour after sunrise. A white or amber lamp must be on the front of the bicycle. The white reflector sold with most bicycles does not meet the requirement. A red lamp or a red reflector must be attached at the rear. White and red reflective materials are required front and rear respectively also, but contrary to common belief, reflective material is not required on bicycles ridden only during the hours of daylight. It should be noted that all equipment must be attached to the bicycle. Technically, equipment worn by the cyclist does not satisfy legal requirements. A red flashing light is expressly forbidden by Section 62 (14). Get rear-ended at night while using one of these and a smart lawyer will sue you for damage to his client's car.

      Brakes: Section 64 (3) specifies that no person shall ride a bicycle on a highway unless it is equipped with a rear-wheel braking system on which will enable the rider to make the braked wheel skid on dry level pavement. Try this at home kids, but I believe you will find that under this test most of your mountain bike prove to be illegal to operate on the roads of Ontario. Any good lawyer would use this point to find you at fault for any accidents that you are involved in!

      Bells, Gongs and Horns: Section 74 requires a bell, gong or a horn to be attached to any types of vehicle, including a bicycle.

      Bicyclists to wear helmet: Section 104 (2.1) No person sh

    96. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 1
      Bicycles overtaken &/or traveling slower than normal traffic: Any vehicle moving slower than the normal traffic speed shall drive in the right-hand lane, or "as close as practicable to the right" edge of the road, except when preparing to turn left or when passing another vehicle according to Section 147. Furthermore, section 148(6) states: every person on a bicycle or motor assisted bicycle who is overtaken by a vehicle traveling at a greater speed shall turn out to the right and allow the vehicle to pass and the vehicle overtaking shall turn out to the left so far as may be necessary to avoid a collision. Passing motorist should also be aware that every person in charge of a vehicle on a highway meeting a person travelling on a bicycle shall allow the cyclist sufficient room on the roadway to pass as per section 148(4).


      Agreed, where is there a miscommunication?

      Cycling on Shoulders: Although Section 150 prohibits motorists in most circumstances from driving on shoulders, cyclists are subject to no such restriction. However, by using the shoulder cyclists are deemed to have left the roadway, and must yield right of way to vehicles on the roadway before returning to it.


      So, staying on the road makes a lot more sense.

      Brakes: Section 64 (3) specifies that no person shall ride a bicycle on a highway unless it is equipped with a rear-wheel braking system on which will enable the rider to make the braked wheel skid on dry level pavement. Try this at home kids, but I believe you will find that under this test most of your mountain bike prove to be illegal to operate on the roads of Ontario. Any good lawyer would use this point to find you at fault for any accidents that you are involved in!


      Interesting point, wasn't aware of that. Both of my Roadbikes can "lock" the rearwheel, more than once I "skidded" thanks to being cut off by a car.

      Bicyclists to wear helmet: Section 104 (2.1) No person shall ride on or operate a bicycle on a highway unless the person is wearing a bicycle helmet that complies with the regulations and the chinstrap of the helmet is securely fastened under the chin.


      I wasn't aware that this was already signed into law, I knew they were debating it, or is it different within city limits?

      If you are going to ride your bike on the road try obeying the traffic laws before you start some rant blaming motorists.


      My run ins with cars / motorist came from being cut off, passed too closely and other "nice" things. Not from taking a car "head on" by riding down a one way (and yes, many many people on bikes do this, they even ride on the wrong side of the bike lane for whatever odd reason they are having).

      There are idiots everywhere, but if you do it on a bike vs. car chances are Darwin will take care of you, if you do it in a car, chances are you'll still be around for a second try.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    97. Re:how about a real bicycle? by sean5008 · · Score: 1
      "Agreed, where is there a miscommunication?"

      Allow me to quote you: "My solution to the passing problem is to be bold and ride in the middle of the lane, especially if there are two lanes.....According to the highway traffic act here in Ontario (and I think all of Canada) a bike is "vehicle" and thus the lane is mine."

      In answer: under the HTA section 148(6), you are failing to yield to the faster passing vehicle, and contrary to your claim, the lane is not "yours", under section 147 you are failing to comply with the requirement to have your slower vehicle "as close as practicable to the right edge of the road, except when preparing to turn left or when passing another vehicle"(s147).

      While I can not speak to your specific incident where the officer states that the vehicle was committing the offense of dangerous driving, were an accident to have occurred (and were you to survive) any good lawyer would be able to have the charges dismissed as you both were committing offenses under the HTA at the time so no fault can reasonably be ascertained.

    98. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Personally, because my area has a large number of bike trails, lanes, and sidewalks, and because we still have bikers who hog lanes and ride between lanes, I feel that we (locally) should ban bikes from the roads. They are a safety hazard. The only ones who get hurt are the bikers, but the only ones who get blamed are the drivers.

      Sidewalks? Umm, no. Bicyclists riding on the sidewalk would not be safe. Pedestrians do not obey any sorts of rules of traffic. They meander all over the sidewalk, stop randomly, take up both sides, etc. Plus, the sidewalks are too narrow. So a bicycle moving at any decent speed would be quite unsafe. For this reason, bicycles are banned on the downtown sidewalks of my city.

      And bike lanes...I can't speak for Denver, but in my area, they are frequently full of road debris. Many bikers ignore them because they aren't safe, either. We appreciate that our county planners were trying...but they didn't do quite enough for it to be useful.

      Bike trails are better. But (A) they just don't go far enough - the trail system around here is about 12 miles, and I don't consider it a bike ride unless I go at least 20. And if you're commuting, it's not just a matter of how far they go, but also if they go where you intend to get. (B) They frequently have a speed limit of 15 - 20 mph (as they are shared with walkers, joggers, and rollerbladers). Some of us like to go faster than that.

    99. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 1
      While I can not speak to your specific incident where the officer states that the vehicle was committing the offense of dangerous driving, were an accident to have occurred (and were you to survive) any good lawyer would be able to have the charges dismissed as you both were committing offenses under the HTA at the time so no fault can reasonably be ascertained.


      Interesting point, Though I am not "blocking".

      If you look at the roads in Toronto you come to realize that on a lot of streets car park on the side. "Door Prices" (including fatalities for the few "lucky" ones) are quite common, so riding at least 2m in the lane falls in the "safe" distance as I am by far not interested in slamming into someone's door. My last crash was exactly because of something like this where I swerved to the right trying to avoid the woman who didn't look and just opened the door, I then ended up in the street car tracks and went flying.

      Point is, "Riding in the lane" for me means leaving enough space to my right side to not be hit by suddenly opening doors, cars can pass just fine as long as they move into the other lane, if they can't do that safely then they clearly shouldn't try to pass to begin with. Ever seen two cars trying to pass at the same time when closing onto each other? Guess who's the odd one out if I happen to be there at the same time?
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    100. Re:how about a real bicycle? by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      > I'm sure that 99% of the drivers are completely unaware of this.

      I am sure this is true: I am also sure that even if they knew then it would not make any difference: after 25 years of cycling my conclusion is that motorists simply do not care enough to wait a few seconds until it is safe. Ask any motorist how long they would wait to overtake safely (1 second, 10 seconds, 5 minutes ?)

      > Everyone wonders why more people don't cycle and I think one of the main reasons is that it is outright dangerous.

      Smoking is much more dangerous, but plenty of people still do it :-)
      I am currently living in Germany: there are loads of cycle paths that *can* make cycling safe: lots of people cycle but lots more people have other excuses/reason not to cycle.

    101. Re:how about a real bicycle? by sean5008 · · Score: 1
      You made a valid point. I agree that "as close as practicable to the right edge" would be fairly considered to include allowance for door openings by parked cars.

      I was simply making a legal point based on the observation of your original assertion that you boldly ride in the center of the street, and all other traffic be dammed. I do not see the need to debate whether a safe allowance should be 2 meters or 1 meter, I will leave the measurement of car doors to your own judgement.

      Personally I feel that much of this problem could be reduced if the police would more vigorously enforce existing no-parking restrictions on primary commuting arteries like Yonge Street and Avenue Road etc. (Such parking while convenient for merchants is frustrating and dangerous for both motorist and cyclist alike)

      The original intent in my first post was to illustrate the my concern that many cylists consistantly fail to adhere to the rules of the road. As a pedestrian, I am continually endangered by cyclists who choose to ride on the sidewalk, ride through crosswalks etc. I am tired of this. If a car was driving down the sidewalk you can bet that 50 people would be on their cell phones calling the police to report a dangerous driver. Bikers always get away with this with impunity.

      Your original point that cars must share the roads in safety with cylists is true and without debate. However sidewalks are the domain of pedestrians. Until cylists begin to respect this fact I fail to see why they should be indignant at recieving similar treatment by motorists.

    102. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 1
      I was simply making a legal point based on the observation of your original assertion that you boldly ride in the center of the street, and all other traffic be dammed. I do not see the need to debate whether a safe allowance should be 2 meters or 1 meter, I will leave the measurement of car doors to your own judgement.


      Let me put it this way, a metre cuts it too close, especially with someone stepping out, also, it prevents cars from coming to close, nothing's worse when you run out of road because you're wedged in between parked cars and a moving truck.

      Personally I feel that much of this problem could be reduced if the police would more vigorously enforce existing no-parking restrictions on primary commuting arteries like Yonge Street and Avenue Road etc. (Such parking while convenient for merchants is frustrating and dangerous for both motorist and cyclist alike)


      I agree, instead of just ticketing though they should impound the truck, maybe then they learn, but of course that is wishful thinking.

      Worse are the cars though who turn where they aren't supposed to (e.g. into Shuter southbound or into the Eaton Centre Parking Garage north bound).

      The original intent in my first post was to illustrate the my concern that many cylists consistantly fail to adhere to the rules of the road. As a pedestrian, I am continually endangered by cyclists who choose to ride on the sidewalk, ride through crosswalks etc. I am tired of this. If a car was driving down the sidewalk you can bet that 50 people would be on their cell phones calling the police to report a dangerous driver. Bikers always get away with this with impunity.


      I agree, though the reason a lot of bikers I guess do this because they don't want to meddle with cars, close calls etc. It sucks, because they feel threatened they move to the sidewalks which makes the Pedestrian the weakest link.

      A solution would be to lobby for more bike paths, and maybe make sure that they are actually "rideable", it is amazing that they, at times, repave the road and do the sidewalks, but the stretch where the bikepath runs is not touched.

      And of course towing and ticketing people who think parking in a bike lane is "ok" would go a long way as well.

      As for "rules of the road" let's face it, many pedestrians aren't much better, Jaywalking etc. (and yes, I do that too).

      I think moving away from a car centric approach within downtown Toronto would go a very very long way of making the city more liveable both for bike riders and pedestrians.

      Your original point that cars must share the roads in safety with cylists is true and without debate. However sidewalks are the domain of pedestrians. Until cylists begin to respect this fact I fail to see why they should be indignant at recieving similar treatment by motorists.


      I think it comes really down to the way the roads are... If someone on the bike feels reasonably safe they will stay on the road, if not they try to find "safer ground" and thus endangering someone else.

      It has to start with the cars, the rest from there will follow.

      What a bold statement to make in North America.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    103. Re:how about a real bicycle? by sean5008 · · Score: 1
      OK, I can see we both have time to debate urban planning, the highway traffic act etc. We are so far off topic now, I keep expecting to be moderated down, but I guess this thread is so old that we are the only ones still reading.

      Here goes:

      "Worse are the cars though who turn where they aren't supposed to"

      Again, I can only agree with your point on illegal turns as the law is very specific in this matter.

      However your next point is arguing the absurd:

      "a lot of bikers I guess do this [commit traffic violations] because they don't want to meddle with cars"

      To argue that violating the law and endangering the saftey of pedestrians is somehow justified because you felt unsafe biking on the road is not only absurd, it is a selfish attitude. If cylcists feel unsafe on the road, then they have the choice to not use their bike or walk with it on the sidewalk. They do not have the choice to break the law and ride on the sidewalks. Two wrongs do not add up to a right.

      I applaud any democratice efforts by you to improve biking, such as lobbying for more paths, or complaining to council to have existing bylaws enforced, however I have to disgree with your opinion on urban planning:

      "I think moving away from a car centric approach within downtown Toronto would go a very very long way of making the city more liveable both for bike riders and pedestrians."

      My opinion on this matter is that Toronto suffers from too much of an anti car attitude, and the underlying cause of this is not a true concern for environment or health but rather a thinly disguised attempt to misdirect the public attention away from a very critical problem in Toronto: for decades we have failed to make the very needed infrastructure investments to upgrade road capacity to meet projected population growth.

      Currently we are suffering with roadways which were designed to support a 1950's sized Toronto. Our budgets have not even allowed for proper maintainance of the existing roadways. Greater capacity is needed. This is essential to the economic survival of Toronto and with more efficiant traffic flow we would also gain reduced smog emissions.

      Stopgap measures to funnel traffic with one way streets and no turn intersections only serves to further increase smog generating gridlock, extend transit time and exasberate illegal driving. Investment in more advanced traffic control systems, the inclusion of more advance turn green lights, and left turn lanes at busy high volume intersections would be a more useful strategy.

      The failure by city council to effectively plan our roadways is compounded by foolish political decisions such as the Sheppard line. (I could talk about this boondoggle alone for a whole day). Politics is not a new problem. Politics also killed the original plans for the Allen Expressway (which was supposed to have extended all the way to the Gardner, which would have relieved a large amount of the traffic which instead comes south on Yonge or Avenue).

      I suppose that some of the blame can be layed at the federal and provincial level as well. Given the huge net outflow of tax revenue from the GTA into the federal coffers, you would think that we would recieve some more support from them. As the third largest city in North America, and the largest tax base in Canada, Toronto is currently in a precarious position somewhat similar to that which New York was in during the late 70's. We stand at a crossroads. If we do not begin to make some critical investments soon, then we will face a rapid decline which will start with the loss of jobs as major corporations relocate head offices out of Toronto. At the end of that slippery slope you can say good bye to more bike paths, and hello more crime.

    104. Re:how about a real bicycle? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      To argue that violating the law and endangering the saftey of pedestrians is somehow justified because you felt unsafe biking on the road is not only absurd, it is a selfish attitude.

      I am not arguing for this or excusing it. It's a consequence that starts higher up the chain. If you want to get bikes of Sidewalks (where they DON'T belong) then you have to remove whatever makes them go on there in the first place.

      One possiblity would be to have an "elevated" bike path that is clearly seperated from the cars through a barrier, this way cars wouldn't get in the bike lane and the bikes would be "safe".

      My opinion on this matter is that Toronto suffers from too much of an anti car attitude, and the underlying cause of this is not a true concern for environment or health but rather a thinly disguised attempt to misdirect the public attention away from a very critical problem in Toronto: for decades we have failed to make the very needed infrastructure investments to upgrade road capacity to meet projected population growth.

      Here I disagree.

      I have only been living here for the past 5 years, but I can tell you that in comparision to Europe the problem is not so much in "road capacity" but "people capacity".

      - Sidewalks in the downtown core are clearly not wide enough.

      - Mass Transit is a problem (Streetcars get stuck in car traffic).

      - The way the traffic lights are set up causes more gridlock (ever heard of a green wave? Why can't they sync the traffic lights?).

      - Too many one way streets. The idea seems to be that people only go "through" the city instead of INTO the city.

      - Again, Mass Transit, it needs a huge investement.

      The solution for Toronto's problems lies not in building more highways but to build a Mass Transit infrastructure to which the Burbs can connect to (kiss and ride, parking lots at the Subway stops, and for crying out loud integrate the different Mass transit systems in the GTA).

      All of this of course costs money, lot's of it, and because of this I am VERY sorry that Toronto didn't get the Olympics, for all the crying that went on by OCAP and such: It would have helped, they would have had to improve the infrastructure and Toronto would have benefited from it for the next 20 or 30 years.

      Currently we are suffering with roadways which were designed to support a 1950's sized Toronto. Our budgets have not even allowed for proper maintainance of the existing roadways. Greater capacity is needed. This is essential to the economic survival of Toronto and with more efficiant traffic flow we would also gain reduced smog emissions.

      Having lived in several European Cities and visited even more I can tell you right now it is not the Road infrastructure per-se that is the problem.

      The main problem is that Toronto (and Ontario) never had a clear vision of what they wanted. On one hand they fiddled a bit with Road ways (think Gardiner) on the other hand they nibbled a bit at Mass Transit (Spadina Streetcars). But there is no overall concept.

      The reality is: By designating right of way to Mass transit in the city, adding feeder transit from the Burbs you could reduce the overall traffic and gridlock, but the reality is that the infrastrucutre isn't there.

      It's nice to talk about putting the Gardiner underground, but until they start building mass transit they will only worsen what is already there. In NO city has building more roads removed congestion, the system is too complex to combat it that way, unless you want to undertunnel all of Toronto and make it one huge parking garage other ways have to be found.

      The failure by city council to effectively plan our roadways is compounded by foolish political decisions such as the Sheppard line. (I could talk about this boondoggle alone for a whole day). Politics is not a new problem. Politics also killed

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    105. Re:how about a real bicycle? by sean5008 · · Score: 1
      Re your disagreement to my point on road capacity: I did mean things like your point on green lights; I was not advocating a wider Gardner, although more off ramps and collector/express lanes would help. The gridlock begins once those cars start backing up at the few exit ramps and try to funnel into the downtown as well as at points like where the QEW and 427 both dump all their traffic onto the Gardner. Also if the subway went south of Union, many more commuters would park down there and take a 5 minute ride into the core (I know I would have). It looks like we are circling each other with semantics and I really see no fundamental difference from in our opinions, just in implimentation.

      I have to disagree with your point on the Allen. Those cars are heading into/out of the downtown any way. To efficiently expedite this and reduce traffic on Yonge & Avenue could only have yielded positive benefits.

      On mass transit, I am right with you. TTC/GO sucks. They may be good compared to some small town but for a city of this population they need to go much further. As a former suburban GO user, I have to say that the speed, frequency, reliability and cost of the service was not a superior alternative to driving. (I could drive in the same or less time from Brampton, at only a slightly higher cost but with a much higher convenience factor) Now living in midtown, I do not find the TTC much better: it takes me 30 minutes to get to work by subway/streetcar; I can walk the same route into the downtown and arrive at work in 45-50 minutes.

      They need to make substantial investments in mass transit. I think they should have extended the Bloor line west past the airport to Square-One in Missisauga, and extended the Yonge line up to Richmond Hill (and yes the transit systems should be amalgamated). For a new line I would have started with placing a line from York U. across midtown Toronto, but definitely not along Sheppard, it needs to be south of Lawrence. But we do still need to invest more in roads as well. Keep in mind that a large amount of the traffic during business hours will never be replaced by public transit. Many of these people are mobile as a part of their employment. Public transit just will not meet this need as efficiently as a private vehicle.

    106. Re:how about a real bicycle? by ElvenMonkey · · Score: 1
      Indeed, but "peddling your ass that distance" would also land you in jail in most countries, not to mention making you late for work.

      I tried peddling my ass a long distance but I just couldn't find anyone remotely interested in donkeys :-(

      --
      "Joy is not in things; it is in us." Richard Wagner
    107. Re:how about a real bicycle? by cortana · · Score: 1

      We can only hope you lose your license before you kill someone.

  4. Why methanol vs ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    from TFA: Does someone want to donate a direct-conversion methanol fuel cell to the project?"

    Why methanol? Wouldn't an ethanol fuel cell be better, because then you could share a drink with it?

    but jokes aside, does anyone know of advantages of methanol over ethanol fuel cells?

    1. Re:Why methanol vs ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm not sure why on the fuel cell, but from racing I can tell you a few things.
      You can't (not as a fuel) buy ethanol, you can buy e-95 (95% ethanol, 5% methanol) Drinking ethanol (100% ethanol) is strictly taxed. They use e-80 and the like a lot in brazil instead of fossel-fuels. e-95 got a bad name as of late becouse it can be used in explosives with ease. Methanol works better as a fuel becouse it absorbs less water from the air (but is still really bad about it) and its cheaper. Also, it smells really good when its burning, but if you drink it, it will pickle your liver. In world war II the us used methonal in torpeados, some people still call it torpeado juice. Also methanol has a higher octain rating (really high, like 130 or something like that) and it can cool your manifold better then gas.

    2. Re:Why methanol vs ethanol by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      In the UK it would be cost, there's a huge tax on pure ethanol (to stop people drinking it) or they add nasty poisons to it for the same reason.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    3. Re:Why methanol vs ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuel grade ethanol doesn't have the spirit tax applied. But you do have to pay fuel duty and VAT if you want to use it in a vehicle - which takes the price for methanol and ethanol up to around 70p per litre anyway (still cheaper than petrol).

      In January 2005 there will be a reduction in the tax on biofuels. Maybe then we'll see some E85 in the UK?

    4. Re:Why methanol vs ethanol by mprinkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Methanol is necessary because it can work with existing polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Methanol is CH4O...that can be ionized and transported through the electrolyte OK. Ethanol is C2H6O. It can't be ionized into a form that can diffuse through the electrolyte. Direct methanol fuel cells are special in that they don't require a reformer for their liquid fuel. That makes them really attractive for compact power systems...like laptops and cell phones.

      I am not a physical chemist, so I don't know if it is possible to design an electrolyte to work with ethanol or other larger hydrocarbons. Usually when fuel cells "burn" larger hydrocarbons, they use some reforming process to turn them into H2 and/or CO first. This makes the systems bigger and much hotter (>800 C)...so there are heat exchangers, pumps, insulation, etc.

    5. Re:Why methanol vs ethanol by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      The efficiency and capacity of the fuel cell is based on how much hydrogen you can push through it. methanol is a lot easier to catalyse into raw hydrogen than ethanol is, and that's why you see it and not ethanol in fuel cell designs... IIRC from my AP organic chem:

      methanol: CH4COOH

      ethanol: C2H6COOH (more like H3CCH3COOH in diagramatic form)

      God I hope I remembered those right. I'm just askin for a beatdown...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  5. e-bike? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...oh, you mean 'electric' bicycle.

    Yeah, that's interesting....not.

    Talk about re-inventing the wheel :)

    By the way, there are many of these already manufactured and ready to roll - Asia has several models I'm sure a few of which are available in your area.

    1. Re:e-bike? by kgbspy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just wait for Steve Jobs to get his hands on it - slap on a coat of bright white paint and market it as an iBike...

      --
      ~
      ~
      ~
      -- INSERT --
    2. Re:e-bike? by michaeldot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just wait for Steve Jobs to get his hands on it - slap on a coat of bright white paint and market it as an iBike...

      Then 5 years later, Michael Dell will slap a black coat of paint on it and sell it as the Dell Despairon Bike 4800.

      It will run Microsoft Bike OS 2009, which will stop every 5 miles until you to get off and clear the super large mutated viruses off the spokes.

  6. Why not pedal? by Comatose51 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Why don't you just pedal instead of riding it? Personally, I spend most of my day in front of a computer now and do even less excerise than I use to after I graduated from college. Needless to say, I put on some weight. Cycling is one of the best aerobic excerises out there. Professional cyclists are among the leanest athletes. Even 30 minutes of pedalling will help burn enough calories to compensate for spending most of your day sitting in front of a screen.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  7. Sharper Image E-Bike? by seanismdotcom · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you considered buying an E-Bike? Something like the Sharper Image One... http://store.yahoo.com/sharperimage-best/si791.htm l $1000

    1. Re:Sharper Image E-Bike? by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1
      Well, at first glance, $1000 is a helluva lot more than the $400 or so this would cost, if you just bought the kit he referenced and payed all the shipping (rather than get the batteries locally) AND got a cheap new bike, or a nice used one.

      Plus it wouldn't be nearly as much fun to build?

    2. Re:Sharper Image E-Bike? by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      Screw all this e-bike moped non-sense. Get a motorcycle and pickup chicks on the way

    3. Re:Sharper Image E-Bike? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is cheaper and better http://www.chargerbike.com/

  8. Excercise maybe? by Compholio · · Score: 0, Troll

    So maybe, just maybe, it's a good idea to actually get some excercise on your bike? You're probably going to work to sit at a desk all day, so you could burn a few calories on the way there and back to make up for your big mac at lunch.

    1. Re:Excercise maybe? by realdpk · · Score: 1

      If you could do a combo pedal + electric, you'd probably see a lot more people riding around towns such as Seattle or worse SF (plenty of uphill riding in both). You'd still be burning some calories -- more than in a car -- and you could maybe even eventually take the electric parts off (or replace the bike) when you get more in shape.

      Besides, some people can't go to work all sweaty, ;)

    2. Re:Excercise maybe? by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Drat, wish I could delete my own posts. Just R'd the TFA (took a chance, usually they're down due to a lack of mirroring, heh). N/m all that nonsense.

  9. True Story by mixmasterjake · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once I was riding my bike to high-school and some jerk dumped their coke on me as they drove by. True Story. Had I been riding an e-bike, I might have been electrocuted.

    --
    TODO: come up with a clever sig
    1. Re:True Story by wretched22 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shouldn't have ridden with those streamers on the handlebars.

    2. Re:True Story by Alien+Being · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, close call! Imagine if it had been Jolt cola?

    3. Re:True Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the way you tell stories, you should be greatful it wasn't gasoline and a match.

    4. Re:True Story by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Never mind the dangers of random strangers deciding to impale you with a lightning rod...

      If the bike can handle rain without killing the rider, it can prolly handle jerks with coke too.

      And if it can't handle that, I think its about time for a class action lawsuit. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    5. Re:True Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it was most likely the playing cards against the spokes that tipped the scale against him.

    6. Re:True Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had an e-bike you might have been able to take a photo of their license plate with a digital camera.

    7. Re:True Story by lundbergaj · · Score: 1

      No, you need to get the streamers that stick out 2 feet on each side supported by a spring that will keep the cars away (unless they like scratches) but not cause you to crash violently if they feel the need to put a scratch down the side of their car.

    8. Re:True Story by losvedir · · Score: 0

      Happened to me once, too, as I was crossing the border.

      --
      "True dat with a wiffle ball bat." -- kabrakan
  10. Don't like pedals? by sapgau · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Back in my day, we used our feet to get the wheels turning... we managed to use the different gears to adjust going up hill. If the hill was too steep we got off and pushed.

    Back in my day, people seemed skinnier too.

    Ha Ha!

    1. Re:Don't like pedals? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

      But Grandpa, why did you need more than one gear? It was uphill both ways back then, wasn't it?

    2. Re:Don't like pedals? by sapgau · · Score: 1

      For Shame!!

    3. Re:Don't like pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      back in your day, women stayed home with the babies and having to rush like hell to get to the day care to get the little monsters ddn't require you to leave work early and ride a 400hp motorcycle to get there before daycare started charging 3 times your weekly salary per 10 minutes you were late.

    4. Re:Don't like pedals? by BraveSlice · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, people used to push gas pedal in their cars we managed to buy a new car every fourth year. If we got a salary rise we bought a new car sooner. Back in my day, people seemed skinnier too, well this I agree, at least if I compare photos of me.

    5. Re:Don't like pedals? by MKalus · · Score: 1
      If the hill was too steep we got off and pushed.


      A real biker does never, ever get off the bike and push, if you have to mash it up the freaking hill you'll do it, but getting off and pushing it means you admit defeat.

      NEVER!
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    6. Re:Don't like pedals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a moron!

  11. Young Geek by BarakMich · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was a young geek of 9, I got my ham radio license.

    I tricked my bike out with an old 2M radio bolted to the handlebars, 6V golf cart battery under the seat, and a whip antenna attached to the frame, down by the rear axle, running up like one of those flags

    More than doubled the bike's weight. I was, however, the kid with a real mobile rig.

    I only really talked to my parents with it, but it was still cool. And ultra-geeky.

    Hehe

    1. Re:Young Geek by gorehog · · Score: 1

      Bravo man, bravo

      and 73's

      ---KC2MMW

  12. 35km/h ? by jjga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do you really mean 35km/h on average? For how long? That is almost as good as a professional cyclist can get...

    1. Re:35km/h ? by va3atc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't have a speedometer but I generally keep up with in city traffic quite nicely.

      I'd say I can usually keep that speed till the next red light, by then I'm recharged and ready to go again :)

      --
      Candle burns its brightest in the dark
    2. Re:35km/h ? by penguinstorm · · Score: 1

      Probably more like 30 over distance; on a road bike 35's not too hard at all, but on a mountain bike MOST people are burning energy pretty quickly at that speed.

      Ned Overend not withstanding, of course, that guy has a VO2 max that coul kill a weaker man.

      --
      Skot Nelson music is my saviour / i was maimed by rock and roll
    3. Re:35km/h ? by really? · · Score: 3, Funny

      It must mean I am in FANTASTIC shape. I kick traffic's butt any day of the week. Oh yeah, I commute in Tokyo ... never mind ... my father could probably kick traffic's butt here.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    4. Re:35km/h ? by julesh · · Score: 1

      Do you really mean 35km/h on average? For how long? That is almost as good as a professional cyclist can get..

      I think you're wrong about professional cyclists. On flat terrain (which is probably what they tested on) with a good bike, _I_ can average about 30 km/h, and I'm not exactly the fittest person in the world. Add hills into that equation and I drop to about 20.

    5. Re:35km/h ? by gnuman99 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Professionals go at about 50km/h for short distances (<60km). About 40km/h for long distances (>100km). This is on a road bike on flat terrain. But they usually travel in packs (peloton). You take a mountain bike, and the increased air drag (ie. your form on the bike), friction from tires and that drops you to about 30km/h with no wind. 40km/h tailwind and you should get up to 40km/h on a MTB (this is no relative wind in this case). "Normal" MTBs can't go faster than that because they don't have the gears and are not designed for the speed (internal friction, fat tires, heavy, etc).

      On my no so great MTB, I average about 28km/h (no wind) over 2 hours (no stopping). You can't go much faster on a MTB over long period of time without help from the weather.

      Short distances, like <5km, you can push to 45+km/h on MTB:)

    6. Re:35km/h ? by rsidd · · Score: 1, Troll
      Do you really mean 35km/h on average? For how long? That is almost as good as a professional cyclist can get...

      I think you're wrong about professional cyclists.

      Most certainly. Professional runners can do better than 20 km/h (current marathon record is a little over 2 hrs, and current 5000m record is a little over 12 mins). A professional cyclist can do well over 50 km/h.
    7. Re:35km/h ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did you know that this year the average for the tour de france was around 43km/hr for 3000km? Including the big ass mountains. That is what professionals do. I am nowhere near that - I can average 43 for an hour and a half in a peleton for a road race. Just yesterday I only lasted 20 minutes in a criterium and we were averaging at that stage 54km/h.

    8. Re:35km/h ? by Viceice · · Score: 1

      Naw... with the correct set of gears and a light, aerodynamic bike, anybody can go 35kph on flat road.

      However, if you could sustain that going uphill over long distance, then thats quite a feat.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    9. Re:35km/h ? by opspin · · Score: 1

      I go 12km to school and 12 back, with an average speed of 25km/h, when riding on a straight road, my speed is about 35km/h. This is on a top of the line (XTR-$6000 mountain-bike)

      My last bike was a recumbent bike, and on that, I did 37km/h effortlessly and 42km/h with a little effort, I was able to go long distances over 50km/h and my top speed, down a quite short hill was 72km/h (I think i Broke the speedlimit there)

      What I'm trying to say is, if you have less than 25km to work, buy a good bike, if you'r only going to use it to get to work fast, buy a recumbent. Also a recumbent is _much_ more comfortable to ride for long distances.

      Oh and on the Tour de France the average speed is over 50km/h (I heard) it would be much more, if they were allowed to ride recumbents (but thats another story)

    10. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This year on a rather hilly Bike course in a half ironman totally undertrained (don't ask) I managed to average 34kph average.

      The top people on the same course did ~39kph.

      And there is no Peloton, the top Tri guys average ~40kph over 180K.... And then run a Marathon.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    11. Re:35km/h ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent was referring to mountain bikes. If I remember correctly, triathalon bikes are more of the road racing type with aerodynamic bodies, or hopefully of course. (Very fat tires and fat frames made more for bumps than for aerodynamics)

    12. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 2, Informative

      A Tri bike is in essence a road bike with a steeper configuration.

      Aero bars also help (though when I see some MTBs with them I have to wonder how they help at all considering that the people are sitting so high up).

      The reality is: If you commute to work and you're not living out in the country, why use a MTB? Get a decent commuter, I have one two which I use to get around downtown with a heavy lock so that it doesn't get stolen.

      I must be the only person in NA who does not own a MTB, it seems that is the only type of bike that people know here.... Almost like the SUV craze (suspension while riding on the road? Sure, if I want to hammer 20 - 30% of my output in the shocks).

      I hate a MTB here too, I got rid of it, as I hardly go off road, though I am moving out west soon, so I might buy one again.

      One can never have enough bikes :)

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    13. Re:35km/h ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you can easily get good hard road tires for a mountian bike. and getting a light enough frame negates everything else.

      Not true. The suspension on a mountain bike absorbs a good part of the rider's output. You'll be far more efficient on the road with suspensionless bike.

    14. Re:35km/h ? by Proteus · · Score: 4, Informative
      The reality is: If you commute to work and you're not living out in the country, why use a MTB? Get a decent commuter, I have one two which I use to get around downtown with a heavy lock so that it doesn't get stolen.

      I must be the only person in NA who does not own a MTB, it seems that is the only type of bike that people know here.... Almost like the SUV craze (suspension while riding on the road? Sure, if I want to hammer 20 - 30% of my output in the shocks).
      I own an MTB. I commute to work with it. It's not SUV mentality -- rather, it's practical concern. While I do live in the city, the city I live in provides a goodly number of bike trails, so I needn't ride city streets to commute. Taking the trails is not only less stressful (no real traffic), but faster as well (fewer intersections, etc.). Unfortunately, there are sections of trail that are gravel, dirt, or badly-damaged asphault. Road bikes are an utter waste on those sections of trail.

      So, I have a y-frame MTB with a suspension - I'd rather waste some of my output (about 12%, BTW, not 20-30%) in absorbing the back-trail type of terrain and saving my back (rear shock). The front shocks are worth it because I can maintain a higher average speed over rough terrain, as the shocks help keep the tire on the trail.

      While I agree that a lot of people buy MTB-style bikes for how they look (or because they don't know any better), one can't automatically assume that every city-rider who has an MTB is clueless. Especially when not everyone can afford multiple bikes -- I know people who commute on city streets, but buy the MTB because they off-road on weekends and don't want to own two bikes.
      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    15. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 2, Informative
      I own an MTB. I commute to work with it. It's not SUV mentality -- rather, it's practical concern. While I do live in the city, the city I live in provides a goodly number of bike trails, so I needn't ride city streets to commute. Taking the trails is not only less stressful (no real traffic), but faster as well (fewer intersections, etc.). Unfortunately, there are sections of trail that are gravel, dirt, or badly-damaged asphault. Road bikes are an utter waste on those sections of trail.

      That's what Cyclocross bikes are for ;)

      So, I have a y-frame MTB with a suspension - I'd rather waste some of my output (about 12%, BTW, not 20-30%) in absorbing the back-trail type of terrain and saving my back (rear shock). The front shocks are worth it because I can maintain a higher average speed over rough terrain, as the shocks help keep the tire on the trail.


      I think it depends on your fork. The "beater MTB" I had had a VERY soft front fork and on more than once (sprinting for a green light) I managed to actually "ram" the fork to the bottom.

      While I agree that a lot of people buy MTB-style bikes for how they look (or because they don't know any better), one can't automatically assume that every city-rider who has an MTB is clueless. Especially when not everyone can afford multiple bikes -- I know people who commute on city streets, but buy the MTB because they off-road on weekends and don't want to own two bikes.


      Yes I agree, not everybody, but the majority of people who ride around downtown Toronto who have MTBs didn't buy them because they needed them. Studded tires and full shocks? Granted, the road conditions in Toronto at times are bad, but not THAT bad :)
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    16. Re:35km/h ? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      No, pro cyclists average much more than 35 km/h :) The average for the Tour de France is right around 38 km/h, but also keep in mind the tour is a mountain race. The fastest average for a single stage ever clocked (a better measure of flat out speed) is around 50 km/h. If you've ever gone that fast (about 30 mph) on a bike, you'd know this is really, really fast. Most non-professional, somewhat in-shape cyclists with a decent road bike can average about 35 km/h over a 70 km ride. Commuters will probably average less though, simply because of traffic.

    17. Re:35km/h ? by j0yb0y · · Score: 1
      Yes I agree, not everybody, but the majority of people who ride around downtown Toronto who have MTBs didn't buy them because they needed them. Studded tires and full shocks? Granted, the road conditions in Toronto at times are bad, but not THAT bad :)

      They ARE that bad here in Montreal. That said I have a "cross-trekking", which is the mtb-side of the cyclo-cross stuff - road-style frame with mtb components, including large clearance brakes.

      And way cheaper. But I admit that this bike ain't for anything except those rough-ish trails you mention.

    18. Re:35km/h ? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Why not just get a real motorcycle? Goes faster, is more fun, and espcially if your on a cruiser...you can more easily pick up chicks while you're riding around.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:35km/h ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I commute using a mountain bike, mostly because the roads I ride on aren't the smoothest (I live in the snow belt where the winter damages the roads).

      For MTB commuting, I suggest:
      - thin, high-pressure, slick tires
      - Any suspension firmed up
      - Appropriately high gearing

      I find I can average 18 mph. And I'm far from a good cyclist, and I easily meet-or-beat my cummute by car! Of course, your mileage may vary.

    20. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Oh, the picking up girls works on a nice road bike too ;)

      And personally I like both, but bikes are more fun, once you're home again you realize just how much fun it is :)

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    21. Re:35km/h ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, aerodynamics of the bike has little to do with performance. But then, maybe you mean of "bike + rider". That really does help a bit. The rider can produce a large amound of areo drag at airspeeds > 14mph or so.

      At least as important: being in reasonable shape (ie- not 50 pounds overweight) and having properly inflated, low-rolling-resistance tires goes a long, long way in terms of high average speeds.

    22. Re:35km/h ? by ljavelin · · Score: 1

      Which bike to use is really based on how and where you ride.

      Recumbants are great, but they really aren't great for riding up mountains or sprints or riding in a tight pelaton... and that makes up a large portion of the TdF.

      Recumbants are great for commuting and long distances, but just watch out if you ride in heavy vehicular traffic - the rider is usually lower and can may be hard to see.

      I ride in a city, and with lots of parked cars and narrow streets, certain recumbants can be hard for drivers to see.

      They don't call be "safety spice" for nothin', ya know.

    23. Re:35km/h ? by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Not to mention rugged urban use that suits MTBs well, such as hopping curbs and medians, riding down stairs, etc. My road bike would fly into pieces if I tried any of that stuff on it.

    24. Re:35km/h ? by bodrell · · Score: 1
      Since everyone seems to be citing their own experiences . . .

      To work: 6 miles = 9.7 km; average speed 17 mph = 27.4 km/hr
      Top speed: 32 mph = 51.5 km/hr (non-sustained, but on flat terrain)
      Top maintainable speed: 21 mph = 33.8 km/hr

      I enjoy racing myself back and forth when I go to work, but I'm not disciplined enough to actually compete. Cycling computers rock.

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    25. Re:35km/h ? by gnuman99 · · Score: 1
      I must be the only person in NA who does not own a MTB, it seems that is the only type of bike that people know here.... Almost like the SUV craze (suspension while riding on the road? Sure, if I want to hammer 20 - 30% of my output in the shocks).

      On a flat road, I don't think you are hammering nearly as much into shocks, especially in high cadence mode where shocks are *not* moving.

      Anyway, MTB with dual suspension is great for roads, at least around here :) Much of the roads around here have potholes, and I prefer to waste some energy into the shocks, just so my back doesn't become the shock absorber.

      This is not SUV mentality, it is a comfort mentality. I would say it is a difference between a Ferrari and a Cadillac. If you want SUV mentality, see this big bike

    26. Re:35km/h ? by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      define heavy lock. hopefully not like this

    27. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      No, it's from the New York Series which as a disc lock.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    28. Re:35km/h ? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      One very valid reason to NOT pick an efficient bike is that your goal in choosing to bike to work might be to get excercise. Yes, you'll have to work harder on a mountain bike than a road bike - but that might actually be the whole point.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    29. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Actually when it comes to cardio exercises you won't get more by "working harder" if anything you'll be getting slower, but you shouldn't be working harder than 80% of your MaxHR anyways.

      So, by having a decent Roadbike (road conditions permitting) you most likely will get a better workout than with a MTB where the lower gearing forces you to spin a lot faster for the same result.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    30. Re:35km/h ? by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      Many disc locks with cylendrical keys are vunerable as well.

    31. Re:35km/h ? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      What you say would only be true if I was saying "I will ride for x number of minutes today", and then I would get the same workout whether I travelled in a harder bike at a slower speed, or an easier bike at a higher speed."

      But what I'm doing is commuting to work on it, and getting exercise as a side-effect. That means I am NOT working out for a fixed amount of time. I am working out for a fixed amount of *distance*. And thus if I use the bike that gives me the same workout at a slower speed, I end up working out for a longer time to cover that same fixed distance. If I use a bike where it's easy to go fast, then I end up finishing too soon.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    32. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried myself, but what I have heard the New York Line was not affected So far nobody broke it.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    33. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      I am not so sure about this.

      Running vs. Walking --> It's distance that counts.

      And again: The effect on your overall cardio is probably the same without having any data right now to back it up.

      The only difference I see is in building muscle, but there your bigger gear probably does more for you on a road bike than the smaller gear on a MTB.

      And let's face it: ANY exercise we get is good, most of us sit way to much around and don't do anything at all.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    34. Re:35km/h ? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Running vs walking is a totally different situation:

      Walking X miles instead of Running X miles means:
      Takes longer, but at a lesser energy rate. Same energy overall is spent.

      Bike with high drag for X miles instead of bike with low drag for X miles means:
      Still takes longer to finish, but at the SAME energy rate. The slowdown is caused by drag, not by lessened effort. More overall energy is spent.

      As an aside, in general, when it comes to excercising, the goal isn't just the number of calories burned while excercising. That's not really the important part. The important part is that if you excercise at a high output at frequent intervals, you end up training your body to change how it burns calories the rest of the time, even when at rest. Your body's metabolism changes depending on what kind of activities it is asked to fufill. If you never raise your heart rate, and don't move around, your stupid body ends up believing it should go into low-power mode and efficiently store up as much energy as possible, like you're heading into winter hibernation. This is that state that most modern people are in all the time. If you subject your body to the regular need for bursts of speed, it responds by changing your metabolism into a more wasteful, but higher-output setting. This is actually the goal of excercise.

      (So, back to the start - although walking and running burn the same calories per mile WHILE you do them, running causes you to burn more calories afterward when you are just resting on the couch.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    35. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      It seems we have different ideas about what we're trying to achive, I talk about the Cardio Benefits, not about the calorie burn ;)

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    36. Re:35km/h ? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      With either goal in mind, my point still works: Doing the same amount of effort for a longer period has more effect than doing it for a shorter period. Where we disagree is that you keep trying to claim that it's not really the same amount of effort when someone goes slow on a high-drag bike versus going fast on a low-drag bike.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    37. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 1
      Where we disagree is that you keep trying to claim that it's not really the same amount of effort when someone goes slow on a high-drag bike versus going fast on a low-drag bike.


      Actually,

      this is exactly what I try to say, that it IS the same effort, I just don't believe that the benefit you are getting from riding the slower bike is great enough to justify it.

      I know there is the old "no pain, no gain" mentality, but at the end of the day anybody who trains "professionally" will tell you that you should train smart, not hard.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    38. Re:35km/h ? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      you should train smart, not hard.

      Agreed. But I'm not going to be convinced by the same repeated assertion that expending the *same* effort for a shorter time is somehow going to be a smarter way to train.

      I'm not trying to push harder. I'm trying to lengthen the time spent doing it. With a quality low-drag road bike, I end up getting home in under 20 minutes. I want it to last longer than that.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    39. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Ah well, to each their own, I train for most of my stuff on time, when it comes to my bike rides I go by distance :)

      M.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    40. Re:35km/h ? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Normally, going by distance would be a great idea. But my situation is such that the distance is a fixed quantity due to the nature of the route.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    41. Re:35km/h ? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      I look at my "training bike rides" as this: trianing, I go riding for a specific purpose, the commuting is just an "add on".

      M.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    42. Re:35km/h ? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Only the soft-tails. A bigger difference is that you don't have the gears to go at high speeds. You have to keep a stupidly high cadence to maintain 50+km/h on a mountain bike.

      If you replace the gears, the tires, use a light bike and make some modifications to the handlebars, then you're almost doing as well as a road bike... but your gears will be too large and soft to handle popping over logs, you'll lose your nice tiny front gears for killer uphills, you won't have the traction necessary for really steep mucky slopes, and your handlebars will just be a nuicense on the trails... and it is still not as good as a road bike.

      People who occasionally ride and brag about the ease of 30+km/h averages on a mountain bike are full of it. I'm sure they're discarding their bad times. I'm happy if I can average 25km/h... that's with the odd long 40km/h backwind and the odd long 12km/hr uphill headwind. Unless I'm sprinting, I don't see much difference in my average over 1 hour, or 6 hours.

      Going faster than 40km/hr on a normal mountain bike is just uncomfortable. Fun, but if you need to pedal at all to stay there, uncomfortable.

      Why do I ride a mountain bike? A cheap road bike is too fragile for traffic, an expensive road bike will be stolen, and a hybrid isn't quite worth the small difference in comfort and performance...

  13. exercise by beavmetal · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Why not just peddle the bike.

    This doesn't help the environment. It increases the use of batteries. Add some more acid to the compost heap.

    This does not help Fat America for it does not induce exercise. With all these electric vehicles (bikes, power wheels, little motorcycles, etc) think of how FAT our kids will be.

    Christ aren't we lazy enough already. Pretty soon there will be machines so we dont have to actually move ourselves during sex. It will be aptly titled the E-Sex machine.

    --
    Looks like it is time to replace your Personality Module. You are a bit to clingy, guess I better replace your fuser to
    1. Re:exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty soon there will be machines so we dont have to actually move ourselves during sex.

      I don't think there are many people on this site who are overly concerned with this problem.

    2. Re:exercise by djchristensen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not just peddle the bike.

      This doesn't help the environment. It increases the use of batteries. Add some more acid to the compost heap.


      Reminds me of an article I read a while back about the proliferation of "e-bikes" in China and how ironic it was that China was being so much more environmentally aware than us stupid Americans.

      I couldn't help but think that those e-bikes were most likely replacing "regular" bikes as opposed to getting people out of their cars. So instead of reducing emissions, they were adding a bunch of lead-acid batteries that need to be charged and that would eventually go to landfills.

      Of course in the poster's case, he probably would be getting out of a car, so he would be making an improvement, just not as much as if he did all the pedalling himslef. Hmmm, what affect would all the extra CO2 from the heavy breathing have?

    3. Re:exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ aren't we lazy enough already. Pretty soon there will be machines so we dont have to actually move ourselves during sex. It will be aptly titled the E-Sex machine.

      I think you'll find those are called vibrators...

    4. Re:exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any means to get those fat, lazy asses off their asses is fine by me.

      In the USA getting more people on e-bikes means less people in cars. It's a net gain in exercise. Pay attention - instead of spouting off your uneducated dross.

  14. dump the e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    e-bikes are for pussies and 'senior citizen'

  15. GoMotorboard 1500X by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been riding a GoMotorboard 1500X that I got refurbished for $150 (down from $300 retail). It really does go 15MPH for about 10-15mi on flat, paved streets on a charge. Small hills (30 degrees) slow it to a crawl and eat the battery, but it keeps chugging, though the rises in Manhattan and most of Brooklyn are no problem. And the regenerative braking seems to work, albeit at much less than 100% efficiency. I've had some battery charging problems, but I got a couple replacements that I can now carry charged, extending its roundtrip charge life to up to 45mi or so. Best of all, it snaps down into a 25lb package over my shoulder, so 10 minute walks from subways are now 3-5 minutes. And it's really fun whizzing around nearly silently. But I wish it had inflatable (less efficient) tires, because the ride over any roughness, including sidewalk seams, can be too much. And quits immediately if the drivewheel gets even a little wet. Worth it.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by Andre060 · · Score: 1
      Small hills (30 degrees)

      Holy CRAP!

      Where on earth do *you* live? I'm not too far from San Fran, and let me tell you .. I don't consider those 30 degree inclines small!!!

    2. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by recursiv · · Score: 1

      It's already been stated by another poster, but 30 degrees is not a "small hill". It is a gargantuan monstrosity of a hill. I have seen precious few paved roads in my life at this incline. This would be a 50% grade, whereas most cyclists would consider a comparatively "tame" 20% grade to be pretty brutal. If any battery powered vehicle can carry a human up this sort of incline for any significant distance at any speed > 0, I would consider that a major achievement.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    3. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to Amazon.com, it can do a 6 degree (10% grade) climb.

    4. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I lived opposite a hill that was definitely more than 30 degree incline whilst living on the Gold Coast. It was a definite danger to the lives of anyone who drove up it, and I know of five people that have been killed coming down it. This hill is so steep that if your car comes out of gear then you are likely to die since your breaks can't handle the load of the vehicle on the way down and it would careen out of control and hit the bank at the front of our property. Trust me, a scooter isn't getting up a 30 degree incline.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    5. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by Ezza · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most people significantly overestimate the steepness of hills, often by 3-6 times.
      What you percieve as "30 degrees" was probably 5 or maybe 10 degrees at worst.
      Most councils restrict roads to an incline of about 10 degrees maximum!

      (google for "overestimate hills")

      --
      I'm a perfectionist but I'm trying to cut back.
    6. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by Keebler71 · · Score: 5, Funny
      And the regenerative braking seems to work, albeit at much less than 100% efficiency...

      And the collective scientific community breathed a sigh of relief.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    7. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      As I mentioned, I'm in NYC, and maybe I'm mistaken about their steepness. I remember SF hills typically at around 45-65 degrees giving me shinsplints. I simulated 30 degrees on my desktop with a sheet of paper, and it looked about right. The hills are small in that they're typically only about 30-40 feet maximum elevation (those are less steep), while SF hills seemed often 100 feet high.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'll post an update after I get back from the great NYC outdoors with my sextant.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'll post an update after I get back from the great NYC outdoors with my sextant.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'll post an update after I get back from the great NYC outdoors with my sextant.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'll post an update after I get back from the great NYC outdoors with my sextant.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      Dude seriously, for a 65 degree hill you would need climbing equipment. Even at 45 degrees, you would need some sticky shoes... Good luck with the sextant.

    13. Re:GoMotorboard 1500X by swmccracken · · Score: 1

      Baldwin Street in Dunedin, New Zealand is listed in the Guinness Book of Records as the World's Steepest Street.

      According to this, at its most steep section (6 meters long)

      "Baldwin Street has a maximum gradient of 1m in 2.86m. This means for every 2.86 metres horizontal it goes up vertically 1 metre" (the word meter is only in their for clarity - you can equally say 2.86 feet horozontal it goes vertically 1 foot.)

      By my calculations that's 19.3 degrees incline. This is steepest section of the world's steepest street, so yeah, 30 degrees seems a pinch on the overzealous side.

      Overall, the street has a vertical distance of 69.2m, and a horozontal distance of 359 m.

  16. get in trouble for having a motorized "vehicle" by SpecialAgentXXX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think you might get into trouble for operating a motorized vehicle without the proper license or registration. Since you stated that you want to commute to work, why not get a scooter? You can ride legally on all of the same roads as a car can and not have to worry about cars passing (and nearly hitting) you on busy streets while on a bicycle.

    I ride a motorcycle to work and it is the funnest thing! I blow past all of the cars and cut in front of everyone at stop lights.

    1. Re:get in trouble for having a motorized "vehicle" by Slugworth01 · · Score: 1
      Riding a motorcycle to work IS the funnest thing. If you are in a state that allows lane splitting (like California) you can get through craptacular cage traffic fairly easily. Makes the commute much more fun.

      On the way home, when you need some stress relief, you take the "long way home" through your favorite windy road.

    2. Re:get in trouble for having a motorized "vehicle" by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 1
      You can ride legally on all of the same roads as a car can and not have to worry about cars passing (and nearly hitting) you on busy streets while on a bicycle.
      [snip]
      I blow past all of the cars and cut in front of everyone at stop lights.

      Somehow I think you might want to watch out for people trying to hit you.

    3. Re:get in trouble for having a motorized "vehicle" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some countries you can ride an electrically power-assisted bike legally without a licence. In Britain, for instance, it's OK as long as the motor cuts out when you stop pedalling or exceed 15 mph, because in that case the vehicle is officially a bicycle rather than a moped.

    4. Re:get in trouble for having a motorized "vehicle" by Software · · Score: 1
      >I ride a motorcycle to work and it is the funnest thing! I blow past all of the cars and cut in front of everyone at stop lights.

      Please make sure to check the "I will donate my organs" box and sign the back of your license. My brother-in-law needs a new set of lungs. Thanks!

  17. Two or Three a Week by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Get run over out here in colorado. Everyone bikes or walks and it seems like almost every day the radio traffic report talks about some pedestrian or biker getting run over. Far more so than anywhere I've ever lived out east. It's more predictably sunny here, so people can bike or walk more, I guess.

    I was coming down out of the mountains last year and got stuck behind some flatlander doing 35-40 mph around the curves. On that road it's all curves. The funny thing was, there was a bicycle behind him and the guy on the bike was tailgating the flatlander.

    Now personally I haven't ridden a bike in about 2 decades. But when I did back in the day, we never wore helmets. The question never came up. Amazing, in retrospect, that we all survived. I went over the handlebars or in other various directions several times back in the day and still managed to survive. I suppose the helmet is to protect your brain while the rest of your body is horribly crushed and mutilated. Or something. Worst case, you might end up like that guy on star trek that has to be pushed around and can only communicate by flashing a light, but at least you survived getting run over by some bozo in an SUV...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Two or Three a Week by BorgDrone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's more predictably sunny here, so people can bike or walk more, I guess.
      I live in the Netherlands, the weather sucks all the time, it's either raining and/or cold, or it's too warm/humid (happens a few days each year, rest of the time it's cold and raining), still we have more bicycles than people here, and no one wears a helmet. ofcourse, it's as flat as a pancake out here, so no crazy downhill speeds.
      I think the reason bikes are so popular down here is that it's just too crowded for cars, and the distances are relatively short.
      It's also probably the only country where it's perfectly normal to pick up your date on a bike.

    2. Re:Two or Three a Week by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      " I suppose the helmet is to protect your brain while the rest of your body is horribly crushed and mutilated. Or something."

      I've heard that one of the most disgusting aspects of dealing with traffic accidents is when people have had their heads smashed open and their brains everywhere.

      I suspect that the helmet law is not 'nanny state' forcing you to wear a helmet for your own good, but rather its in the interests of morale in the emergency services.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:Two or Three a Week by dasunt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was coming down out of the mountains last year and got stuck behind some flatlander doing 35-40 mph around the curves. On that road it's all curves. The funny thing was, there was a bicycle behind him and the guy on the bike was tailgating the flatlander.

      FYI, not all vehicles handle curves the same, nor do all tires. Also, many people don't want to feel the centrifugal force while going around the corner, or have everything in the back shift to the other side of the vehicle.

      Is it the car commercials that creates the race-car mentality in most people? Is it the long commutes to work? What? Its amazing how irate people can become when you do "only" 5 mph over the speed limit. Or when you slow down on a curvy road so that your stopping distance is less then your field of vision. Speaking of stopping distance, its amazing how many people think that a 20 year old pickup, fully loaded, with trailer, will stop as quickly as a compact car. At least, that's what I'm assume they are thinking, why else would they pull out right in front of me?

      Slow down.

    4. Re:Two or Three a Week by paulwomack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's also probably the only country where it's perfectly normal to pick up your date on a bike.

      I love it. In far too many countries (and I include specifically the UK and USA) your percieved status is almost solely defined by the cost of your car.

      BugBear (whose bikes are worth more than his car)

      --
      Ignorance is curable. Stupid is forever.
    5. Re:Two or Three a Week by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Speaking of stopping distance, its amazing how many people think that a 20 year old pickup, fully loaded, with trailer, will stop as quickly as a compact car. At least, that's what I'm assume they are thinking, why else would they pull out right in front of me?

      Um, probably precisely because they know they can't stop as well as you, and in their experience it's the nuts driving the compact cars that insist on pulling out in front of the 20yo pickups loaded and with trailers....

      Speaking as such a driver, I might add. I leave lots of room, only to have some idiot in a Honda Accord or Civic pull out right in front of me. Do you want to die? I don't want to kill you, but if you hit your brakes, I won't have much of a choice.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    6. Re:Two or Three a Week by XemonerdX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention over here in the Netherlands you are ridiculed when riding a 'Spartamet', which is a bike with an additional small electrical motor, unless yer 60+ or something :)

      Also, the Netherlands is probably the only country where on a Saturday evening in the major cities you expect to leave yer home with a bike and return home with another one ('stealing' bikes is the national pass-time)...

    7. Re:Two or Three a Week by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
      I leave lots of room, only to have some idiot in a Honda Accord or Civic pull out right in front of me. Do you want to die? I don't want to kill you, but if you hit your brakes, I won't have much of a choice.
      Speaking as a driver of a car slightly bigger than an Accord, I would much rather be in front of you than behind you. When I am in front of you, my vision is not blocked by your over-height vehicle and oh-so-macho dually fender flares, and my dodging options in dicey situations include going ahead rather than being stuck in a sandwich by your low acceleration and trailing traffic.

      What really irritates me is when people towing trailers refuse to obey the posted lane restrictions, causing huge traffic backups by bottling up traffic in all lanes to their speed. Those people ought to be pulled over and have their keys confiscated until the end of rush hour.

      --
      Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
    8. Re:Two or Three a Week by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      You can be in front of me, just don't cut me off. The stopping distance *I* need is 3-4 times the distance you need, to space yourself accordingly.

      As for too tall? My truck has never been too tall. Because when it's that loaded up, I wouldn't be able to see behind me. There are still vehicles large than mine on the road who need even more stopping distance than I need.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    9. Re:Two or Three a Week by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Don't get me started on that helmet craze.

      It's absolutly retared, I learned how to ride a bike when I was six, taught it myself on a parking lot.

      I never had a helmet until I came to Canada and started Triathlons because now they are mandated.

      I can't count how often I fell off the bike, went over the handlebars and all, but that's it.

      I know people who "swear" by them and say they safe lives.... Maybe, but if you look at the average crash that is fatal (e.g. hitting the curb head first) I doubt that a flimsy bike helmet will do anything to protect you.

      You're best protection is still to be aware of your surroundings and assume that everybody is out to kill you.

      A lot of people with helmets get this "I wear a helmet, I am safe" attitude that you can also observe in SUVs.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    10. Re:Two or Three a Week by hankwang · · Score: 1
      I suppose the helmet is to protect your brain while the rest of your body is horribly crushed and mutilated. Or something.

      The added value of wearing a helmet while biking is usually overestimated.. (Google around to find more information from advocates and skeptics)

      The requirements for a bicycle helmet are that an object the size and shape of a human head should not be exposed to harmful deceleration when dropped from 150 cm (or so). A helmet is typically a piece of styrofoam designed to be completely crushed by such an impact. Problems with this approach are:

      • In a realistic accident, it is not just a separate head, but a 5 kg head with 70 kg of body behind it. A fall from 150 cm corresponds to a velocity of 20 km/h upon impact. Most lethal accidents happen when a cyclist collides with a motor vehicle going at a much larger speed. All this means that in most lethal accidents, the helmet can only absorb a small fraction of the impact energy. Only in very few cases this will make the difference between lethal and nonlethal.
      • The brain is a bunch of soft tissue surrounded by a hard skull (that incidentally can handle much more abuse than that piece of styrofoam we call helmet). The brain cannot be compressed easily because there are no air pockets, but it can be torn apart relatively easily. Hence, a shock such as in the helmet test is much less likely to cause damage than a sudden rotational motion of the skull. The chance of the latter happening actually increases if you wear a helmet, since your head gets "bigger" and can more easily make a "sliding" contact.
      • The chance of dying due to head injury per hour of travel is about the same for someone in a car as for cyclists. Why don't automobilists wear helmets?
      Of course, someone who cycles while drunk (not that that's a good idea anyway) had better wear a helmet because single-sided accidents are much more likely and there are less reflexes to protect the head during a fall. :) For the rest of the cyclists, a helmet is more likely to protect you from a couple of bruises than from dying in a crash.
    11. Re:Two or Three a Week by MKalus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Is it the car commercials that creates the race-car mentality in most people? Is it the long commutes to work? What? Its amazing how irate people can become when you do "only" 5 mph over the speed limit.


      Okay, personally speaking I like the feeling of getting into a curve, especially if I know the area very well.

      Maybe 10 years or so ago there was a stretch of road where I grew up that was very very winding. THe cool thing was that there was a long straight away (~2km long) where you could see who entered the "track", if you drove slowly there the guy in front of you made it wonderfully up the side of the hill before you entered the "maze". So we had those little "races" where we timed ourselves on how long it took to get from the bottom to the top, I think I topped it out at ~70km/h average on a really twisty and windy course.

      Reality is: Most speed limits are set at a pace that allows even the worst drivers to navigate carefully, and knowing the limits of your car does not only come in handy when you try to "race" but also when you have to swerve around obstacles or get into an emergency situation.

      EVERY new car I owned I ended up going to a parking lot within the first week and litterally drove the car to a point where I lost control and skitted / spun out.

      Why? Because I wanted to know how far I can push it without losing control, this came handy more than once when I had all of the sudden an obstacle on the road that I had to swerve around or break (breaking is not always the safest option, depending on road condition and what's going on behind you).
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    12. Re:Two or Three a Week by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah yes, well the mountain run is also littered with routinely-ignored signs that say "Slower vehicles use turn-outs." If I recall correctly, failure to do so can result in a citation if you you have more than 3 cars on your back bumper. There are plenty of places where the turn-outs are visible with plenty of stopping distance for even the most ancient of vehicles, and yet 14-car lines are a regular sight up there. Usually someone in a rented brand-new Pontiac sedan at the front of the line, too.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    13. Re:Two or Three a Week by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Actually it is because that human body except the head is surprisingly tough. Impacts that might only bruise when done to the body will be fatal if done to the head. Combine with most bike design that a crash causes the cyclist to fly forward head first, and a helemet will prevent fatalities or head trauma that leaves a person a vegetable.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    14. Re:Two or Three a Week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dasunt (249686) on Monday October 04, @04:00AM (#10426306)

      says : "Slow down".

      I say :

      Get out of the passing pane before I run over your sorry, pickup truck driving, ass.

      People who think they have the right to enforce their ideas of "how fast is too fast" turn my stomach. Fuck you all.

    15. Re:Two or Three a Week by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Flimsy? You don't know what you are talking about. Helemets will protect you from most any head impact. I have never heard of a single head injury when they wore a helmet. Actually I know of one accident where he hit chin first and had a broken jaw.

      It is more of wear a helmet and you will live. My dad was it from the side by some jerk that pulled out from a side street. He had a broken leg and his helmet was cracked by his head was ok.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    16. Re:Two or Three a Week by dasunt · · Score: 1

      People who think they have the right to enforce their ideas of "how fast is too fast" turn my stomach. Fuck you all.

      Yet you have no problem with your "right" to decide that everyone should break the law and risk a speeding ticket just so you can get someplace 5 minutes earlier.

    17. Re:Two or Three a Week by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 1

      >Is it the car commercials that creates the race-car mentality in most people?

      actually, people associate going fast with being COOL.

      but you see, it is actually MUCH COOLER to go slow because it means you are either:

      a) smoking a joint
      b) receiving a blowjob

      both of which are very cool experiences, and highly recommended. so you see, everyone has it backwards.

      going fast is actually gay because it shows that someone is in a hurry and hence subject to some reprimand for being late and hence under someone elses thumb. not cool.

    18. Re:Two or Three a Week by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Well the parent post has a point that people do not practice lane discipline, so use the left lane for passing. However, no one likes the douche bag who thinks what ever local road is the autobahn(unless it really is the autobahn). Speaking of autobahn, not ever one who drivers a BMW is an ass, so please stop thinking it's cool to tailgate, and for christ sakes use your turn signals.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    19. Re:Two or Three a Week by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Okay,

      have a look at a bike helmet. They are rather thin from the shell standpoint and they are also covered with a lot of vents which makes them (by default) less sturdy.

      Now compare them with a motorcycle helmet and you'll come to realize that they are just glorified things. Can they help? Sure, anything is probably better between your head and pavement, but it is even better not to hit the pavement in the first place.

      I do NOT rely on a helmet to keep me safe, I rather try to adapt my riding to not having to test the helmets abilities, and I DO have an expensive Pneumo.

      I still think people overestimate the safety a helmet brings, just because it has cracked doesn't necessarily mean the same would have happened to your head (in fact, you might not have hit your head at all without the helmet, afterall it adds a couple of inches to your head).

      I seperated a couple of times from my bike and I have never hit my head, I also did a nice high speed wipeout in a curve, caused a lot of road rash but nothing hit the head.

      I know that helmet advocats like to point out the dead that occasionally happen at le tour, but if you look at those accidents not even a helmet would have those guys, ramming head first into a stone road marker at well over 50kph.... No helmet would have saved him.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    20. Re:Two or Three a Week by AndrewHowe · · Score: 1

      Sad innit. The funniest thing is, the more you spend on your car (or bikes :-) the less money you have to spend on other things... And cars depreciate rapidly, especially expensive ones (with the exception of *really* expensive and rare ones for which there's a waiting list).
      Boy: Check out my car. Bling, no?
      Girl: Aha, that's nice. So you were going to buy me a drink?
      Boy: Uhh.. I'm a bit skint.. Just bought these new rims, shiny huh?
      Girl: Oh, I have to go now.

    21. Re:Two or Three a Week by drew · · Score: 2, Informative

      as somebody who just spent a large part of yesterday stuck behind a car very similar to the one the parent mentioned, i must say that i have no problem being behind somebody who is not going around the corners at the posted speed limit. however, ifyou are going to drive down the entire mountain at 10 mph below the posted speed, you could at least have the courtesy to use the slow vehicle pullouts provided every few miles specifically for those drivers. personally, i'm starting to believe that police should give out tickets for people going under the speed limit not using the slow vehicle pullouts, and the amount of the ticket would be the same amount as a speeding ticket would be for going he same number of miles per hour over the speed limit as the driver in question is going under the speed limit. that or maybe a ticket for not using the pullout when you have more than 7 cars backed up behind you.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    22. Re:Two or Three a Week by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
      Is it the car commercials that creates the race-car mentality in most people? Is it the long commutes to work? What?
      Why is it that because someone can drive safely at a higher speed than you, you consider it a "race-car mentality." You wouldn't become irate if you'll walking somewhere and you come across someone walking about half your "comfortable" pace who refused to move? For some people, there is damn near physiological pain caused by being forced to move that slow. How would you feel if you were forced to drive with your e-brake engaged? Or travel everywhere by foot with alot of heavy weights strapped on you? Simple fact is that we're each comfortable with a different level of mobility. If something or someone slows that mobility (for whatever reason), it will irritate us. This is why the simplest and more sensible thing to do is simply to allow faster traffic to pass.

      Its amazing how irate people can become when you do "only" 5 mph over the speed limit. Or when you slow down on a curvy road so that your stopping distance is less then your field of vision.
      People become irate when others feel they have a right to force others to go their own speed by obstructing traffic. No one would care what speed you did if you did it out of the fast lane, or if you occasionally moved to the shoulder on a 1-lane road to allow faster traffic to pass. Nothing disgusts me more than when I see a huge traffic jam on the highway, with 4 lanes of open road ahead of a single dickhead in the passing lane matching the speed of the lane beside him (or a single person in a one-lane road with a stack of like 15 cars behind them that won't move over and let traffic pass)

      of stopping distance, its amazing how many people think that a 20 year old pickup, fully loaded, with trailer, will stop as quickly as a compact car. At least, that's what I'm assume they are thinking, why else would they pull out right in front of me?
      Similarly, why does the 20 year old fully loaded pickup have no problem jumping in front of me in a hurry while it can see me flying down the road behind it, only to barely move afterwards?

      Don't be a jackass.

    23. Re:Two or Three a Week by Garak · · Score: 1

      Bike helmets are for low speeds(50km/h and less) compared to a motorcycle helmet(100+km/h) Also its designed to break in an accident to absorbe energy like a crumple zone on a car.

      I once had the front tire on my bike colapse sending me face first into the pavement. Tore the hell outa my chin, but the helmet took the worst of it. If anything they give you something to slide on. :p

      --
      God, root, what is the difference?
  18. Why lead-acid? by scdeimos · · Score: 3, Informative

    If it were me, I'd dump the lead-acid cells and use Li-Poly (Lithium Polymer).
    Sure they're more expensive but they're much, much lighter due to their greater power density (hence a lot easier to pedal when you're not using the batteries).
    Just make sure you use a real Li-Poly charger otherwise they could go bang.

    1. Re:Why lead-acid? by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      They are quite dangerous, even with the proper charger. I know people who use them in model airplanes and one nearly had his house burn down due to a problem with his battery while it was just sitting there doing nothing!

    2. Re:Why lead-acid? by scdeimos · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anything can be dangerous when abused and mistreated. It is also possible to blow-up lead-acid batteries if they're not charged correctly (eg: in a poorly-ventilated area with a spark igniting the hydrogen efflux Car Talk).

      I have been using Li-Poly batteries in electric aircraft for a while now, even a "hot liner" glider which pulls around 65-amps through a geared-down Astro-05. I haven't had any blow-up yet, but I have heard of the occasional one doing so. The only one's I've seen so far have been postings to the internet where people have forced them to blow-up by overcharging them causing a thermal runaway (eg: BANG! (5.1MB)). I've blown-up the occasional Ni-Cd and Ni-MH cell over the years by overcharging them, too.

      Oh well, I guess FUD has moved into the battery world too.
    3. Re:Why lead-acid? by Drakin · · Score: 1

      I think the issue with Li-Poly battereis blowing up only happens when the cells have been damaged,then charged.

    4. Re:Why lead-acid? by scdeimos · · Score: 2, Informative

      The main issue with Li-Polys (and to a lesser extent, Li-Ions) is that once they get above a certain temperature (around 150 degrees-C, I think) they start an exothermic reaction and go into thermal runaway. In minor cases this causes the cell to swell and stop working, but in extreme cases it can actually get to a high enough temperature that the Lithium ignites and the cell explodes.

      If you pay attention to the manufacturer's discharge ratings, carefully inspect cells after a "prang" and allow cells to cool before recharging then you shouldn't have any problems.

    5. Re:Why lead-acid? by asynchronous13 · · Score: 1

      Li-Poly batteries got their bad rap because early Lithium-Ion batteries were more prone to explosion than other types of batteries. The newer Lithium-Polymer batteries have reduced the risk of explosion due to overcharging or incorrect charging.

      Their problem now is that Lithium reacts very violently when exposed to air. A Li-Poly battery that gets cracked (ie if your RC plane crashes hard enough) will not explode, but it will get *extremely* hot -- somewhere around 1500F (one-thousand five-hundred degrees fahrenheit) -- causing the remainder of you plane to go up in flames.

      This is not to say don't use Li-Poly becuase they are dangerous. The charge density and the weight are excellent -- just be aware of what the dangers are.

    6. Re:Why lead-acid? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Are you sure that's a good idea? Can Li-Poly batteries handle high current loads? The advantage of Lead-Acid and Ni-Cd batteries are that they can pump out a ton of current all at once. I think you'd have to charge a big capacitor or something if you used Li-Poly.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Why lead-acid? by pm · · Score: 1

      A typical lithium polymer battery has a carbon-lithium anode separated by a conducting salt or a polymer with a LiCoO2 or LiMn2O4 cathode with a polymer gelled to a conducting salt. Batteries with a true Li anode are, to the best of my knowledge, not available on the market. So a lipoly battery will not explode when exposed to air or water. Lipoly cells can get very hot when they are ruptured or shorted and thus should be treated carefully if there is the possibility that this occured, but it's not due to a reaction with the air but is through discharge through a low-resistance path. The primary way that a lipoly battery catches on fire is due to overcharging which leads to the breakdown of the electrolyte which can cause a thermal-runaway condition.

    8. Re:Why lead-acid? by pm · · Score: 1

      When lithium polymer batteries were ramping up in production current disharge rates were limited to somewhere between 4C and 6C (where "C" is the capacity of the pack in A/h). So a 1A/h battery was limited to about 4A to 6A. Newer lithium polymer batteries can discharge at rates as high as 20 times the capacity (about 10C to 15C is more typical). Practically any newer lithium polymer battery that would give you a decent run time for your application, will be able to deliver enough current for it. It's definitely something to watch out for when buying the pack though.

    9. Re:Why lead-acid? by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      Since you seem knowledgable with this topic :)

      When they increase the rate of discharge of the battery, does this also improve the rate of charge? Or are they not necessarily related? I ask because I assume that the 20x rate you quote has been achieved to aid charge times, but that a nice side effect is the discharge rate...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  19. The girl from the site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    is getting me e-xcited. More girls should ride bikes in short skirts.

    goldenmotor.com/e-Bike-DIY/sample-e-bike.jpg

  20. Use a Velomobile! by Nyh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I use a Velomobile to get to work and back (http://www.velomobiel.nl/). It is fast and wether proof. (and there is a lot of nasty wheter over here in the Netherlands.

    Nyh

    1. Re:Use a Velomobile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I heard well designed velomobiles go easily 45 to 49 km/h, what is your cruising- and top speed ?

      Aerodynamics are a huge factor in cycling, good that bicycle engineers see this now too, and dare to look different! 2 years ago, in battle mountain, nevada, Sam Wittingham reached 130 km/h on over a 200 meter sprint with flying start, on a flat surface, 1800 meters high, with just 500 watts of muscle power, that was an awesome sight...

      I ride a Hurricane not too aerodynmic, but good for fast cornering and offroad, cruising speed ca 32-36 km/h, not too bad for touring :) Top speed 56 km/h, downhill little under 80 km/h. http://www.challengebikes.com/)

    2. Re:Use a Velomobile! by armb · · Score: 1

      Right now one of our family cars is dead (but being resurrected, I've ordered a replacement engine) and the other one is sick, and we're wondering if we can manage without one. If we do, I could justify the cost of something like that.
      For the moment I do cycle a few days a week (16 miles each way) on a conventional (upright) bike. With a headwind like today a faired recumbent would be very nice.
      (Addressing points elsewhere in the topic, I shower and change at work.)

      --
      rant
  21. Why not help him? by potat0man · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why don't you help this guy instead of giving him advice he's not asking for?

    I can't believe how pessimistic this slashdot crowd can be. Some guy wants to work on a new project to replace his car and all anyone can do is call him a fat ass.

    1. Re:Why not help him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can't believe how pessimistic this slashdot crowd can be.

      You must be new here. Believe it.

    2. Re:Why not help him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Soooo potat0man lemme guess...you're a fat ass? ;-)

  22. More info on the linked kit... by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is something I have been thinking about for a good 6 months now, and it may be my winter project this year...

    What do you know about the kit that was linked in the article? It seems that this kit powers your front wheel, while you power the back with a stadard pedal arrangement. That's something I haven't seen in an ebike before. Would you be limited to going the fastest that the motor/gearbox in the front wheel can move, or would you be able to add your pedal power and the electric motor to move at a greater pace? I obviously see the potential for greater acceleration and easier to maintain speed while going uphill, etc, but I'd like to be able cruise at a high speed for longish distances. Or, alternatively, add a little extra speed to my cruising for long durations.

    The battery, I agree looks pretty hefty, I'll be interested to see what the /. crowd comes up with on that. Does the "power braker" = a regenerative braking system, or is it some sort of power assited brake to help you slow down at higher speeds and with the extra weight?

    1. Re:More info on the linked kit... by __aaxtnf2500 · · Score: 1

      adding power to the rear wheels by pedaling should reduce the counter-voltage developed in the stator(or is it field for dc motors...) by the rotor. so pedaling will make you go faster. it is obvious that if the motor is synchronous, reducing the load will lengthen the battery life, or if not, make you go faster. if this is wrong, please upgrade me, it's been a while since motor theory.

  23. Lost Technology by Gogela · · Score: 2, Funny

    Two words people: MO-PED. Yah... it's already been invented. You can pick one up from the neighborhood kids for about 50 bucks.

    --
    A hungry man will tell you anything if you give him a cookie.
    1. Re:Lost Technology by friedmud · · Score: 4, Funny

      But that burns fossile fuels!!!!

      Unlike the coal power plan that makes the electricity that charges your E-Bike...............

      Friedmud

    2. Re:Lost Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two words

      Fat Chicks (are like Mo-Peds...fun to ride until your friends find out.)

    3. Re:Lost Technology by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      This E-SHIT is really starting to get on my nerves. When I saw "e-bike" I thought "Wow, someone's invented a bike you can download from a website".

      What's next? e-penis?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:Lost Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, Coal power plant is approximately 40% efficient. Electric motors are about 90% efficient. Coversion to battery power may be 90% efficient. 90% x 90% x 40% = 32.4% efficient. Gasoline powered ICE's 12% efficient. 2 Stroke motors pollute more and have no emissions controls. Cars have catalytic convertors but still pollute. Power plants have to strictly control emissions. I say it's still a net benefit.

    5. Re:Lost Technology by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      We have hydroelectric power where I live, you insensitive clod!

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    6. Re:Lost Technology by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Geez!

      Took you long enough! I was waiting for that reply!

      How many thousands acres of land were destroyed / flooded when they created that damn?? If you're worried about ht environment that can't be a good thing ;-)

      J/k of course. But I do like to throw a monkey wrench into the wheel of environmental protection ;-)

      Friedmud

  24. let's get it over with - 1ce&4all by l3v1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't see why won't you just be the ubergeek and build an android with your image and send it to work every day so you won't have to even get out of your bed ? You wouldn't even have to sit on a bike, let alone pedal the darn thing.

    Man, if laziness would be a lethal disease, we'd have many more IT jobs open.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:let's get it over with - 1ce&4all by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      The moment we have machines that replace us completely is the moment humans are obsolete. And what happens to most obsolete hardware? You see it around a little for the next few years before it completely disappears. Personally I'd rather work than have my species cease to exist.

      Although if some people ceased to exist I wouldn't be mad, mind you....

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  25. Re:Use a Velomobile, they are fast dry efficient by NtwoO · · Score: 5, Informative
    They are really amazing. My distance to work is 70km and I do it twice a week. Best time for the 70km is 1h53. The superiority of a Velomobile is proven in bad weather conditions. The vehicle is relatively insensitive for wind. This is due to a Cx (wind drag coefficient) of .15 A normal bicycle is above 1. The price is a minor problem. It is only a problem untill you have it. The 9 month delivery time is a major problem.

    --
    ! /* */
  26. Bicycle commuting by angio · · Score: 4, Informative
    I spent a summer in the bay area without a car (interesting experience; not recommended). Part of that involved a 12mi each way commute by bicycle. It was usually the highlight of the day - took about 50 minutes if I didn't want to get sweaty, about 5 minutes longer than it took via caltrain and walking. I'd highly recommend attempting your commute on a normal bike for a while and see how it pans out, particularly if it's under, say, 10-15 miles. The exercise is great, and it's a nice way to flush work from your system on the way home---and you get to pass all of those poor suckers in cars during rush hour. :) The advantages to a non-powered bike are several:
    • Easy storage - you can haul it into your office / apartment / up stairs, etc., with no effort.
    • Value - bike theft is a major problem in some areas. A good commuter bike is cheaper than an e-bike, and (because of the easy storage thing) easier to secure.
    • Efficiency - the MPGs are a little higher... ;-)
    • Maintenence - maintaining your own bike is easy and rewarding. I suggest Zinn and the Art of Road Bike Maintenence (or mountain, if you're of that persuasion). Verrrrry good book. With no engine to take care of, it's easier to deal with on your own.
    • Exercise - goes without saying.
    • Easier to stuff in a car... just in case. :)

    If you can shower at work, it's easier, but it's also very possible to take it a little easy on the way in to work and not show up smelling. Then you get the option of hammering it on the way home or just taking it easy. :)

    Good luck with whichever way you decide to get to work -- far better than hauling a 3000lb steel beast to and fro every day!

    1. Re:Bicycle commuting by kraut · · Score: 1

      If your commute is the highlight of your day, it really is time to change jobs! ;)

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    2. Re:Bicycle commuting by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      You forgot the best bit about cycling...

      You can stop at the pub on the way home and have a few pints without worrying about losing your driving licence !

      Hell I even used to carry an "emergency" can of Stella Artois on my water bottle rack during my 17 mile round trip commuting days.

      "When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race." ~H.G. Wells

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    3. Re:Bicycle commuting by tmortn · · Score: 1

      depends on where you live... colorado will write you up for a DUI on a bike.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  27. The best E-bike by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1
    1. Re:The best E-bike by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  28. Pedal, it's faster by markw365 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I commute to work 3-4 days a week, 19 miles one way. Takes about 60-75 minutes. Get a nice late 80's early 90's lightweight road bike and just ride. On a flat once you're in shape, maintaining 20+mph isn't that hard. With the E-Bike, you won't get in shape, and you'll have guys like me passing you uphill and laughing. I've buried E-bikes on my road bike. Usually on a bit of an incline, and who knows, batteries may have been dead on the thing, but they weren't keeping up, that's for sure.

  29. Good lord...welcome to slashdot by omarKhayyam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The poor guy asks for advice building an e-bike, and 50% of the +3 comments are "Why don't you just peddle (you lazy f*ck)?" Because I'm sure that thought NEVER CROSSED HIS MIND. Ever.

    1. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


      "...'Why don't you just peddle[sic] (you lazy f*ck)?' Because I'm sure that thought NEVER CROSSED HIS MIND. Ever...."

      Sadly, given the (general) state of our health and our fitness levels, this could easily be true.

      T&K

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    2. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What did you expect from the "RTFM!" crowd?

    3. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe that's because those comments are right?

      An e-bike confers no speed advantage, at the cost of being environmetally unfriendly, and denying the user exercise.

      Objectively speaking, this is a net loss. So yes, he is a lazy bastard, and a polluter to boot.

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    4. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Tell me which is more efficient in the grand scheme of things:

      1. A human's crappy digestion system converting calories in food into useful legwork to pedal.
      2. Converting coal into electricity which powers the bike.
      If you answered (1) then you're wrong. net-net it's the coal/nuke/even oilburning that's more efficient and better for the environment when you take total entropy into account.
    5. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by gujo-odori · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You write like a person who has never ridden one, maybe even never seen one. E-bikes do:

      - Confer a speed advantage

      - Often need to be pedaled in addition to electric power.

      Many others have already pointed these things out, perhaps you would do well to read a bit more.

      You might also want to consider that a person who is planning to build/buy an e-bike to take to work at least some of the time is most definitely reducing pollution relative to taking a car to work every day. So what does he get instead of help with his plans and maybe a little praise for lowering pollution? Crap from people who think his good efforts are not good enough unless he's a triathlete.

      By they way, how do you get to work?

    6. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Get used to it: $SHINY_NEW_THING comes and most of the comments around here would be of the form, "But $HACKABLE_STUFF already exists; why would you ever need $SHINY_NEW_THING?"

      Come to think of it, it's amazing to see how resistant, even cynical, a distributed group of folks calling themselves 'nerds' are, to change.

    7. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by retards · · Score: 1

      So you mean e-bike riders are dead when they ride and thus need no energy?

      Humans need lots of energy just to keep up life-preserving functionality like blood pressure, lung musculature and so forth.

      So someone using an e-bike is not only converting a lot of calories to energy with his crappy digestive system, but he also is using the coal-to-electricity-to-bike-miles conversion.

      Besides, what do you think the total energy cost of aquiring coal/oil/uranium(!) to turn into heat is? Maybe you think oil squirts right into the barrel? Uranium crawls out of mountains and climbs into reactors? Maybe coal mines dig themselves, too.

      And I haven't even talked about environmental issues... you don't hear about environmental toll from people farting, taking a dump or exhaling carbon dioxide.

    8. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Actually, my first reaction was "what the hell's an e-bike"?

      My second reaction was "why not spent the dough on a Segway or Prius and really geek out"?

    9. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by syphax · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >An e-bike confers no speed advantage, at the cost of being environmetally unfriendly, and denying the user exercise

      It also denies the user sweat, which is important if a shower is not available at work (or if time is at a premium), and is much more fuel efficient than another non-sweaty option, driving a car.

      Why is driving a car OK, riding a bike is OK, but riding an e-bike is lazy?

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    10. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same reactions, culminating with "the guy sounds fake, this is probably stealth marketing". I mean, if you are lazy you would drive a car, and if not, why on earth would you not pedal for the exercise?

    11. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Actually, I do regularly ride a bike to work, 12 km two ways. That takes me about 45 minutes, and I arrive without sweating any more than I would standing in a subway carriage. If my biker's sweat would be offensive, then so would the sweat of one who has just spent some time in a crowded subway carriage.

      Of course, if you're a lardass and you try to ride that distance at that speed, you will sweat a lot more. There's two solutions:

      1. Exercise more so that you don't have to pedal all those extraneous kilos around.
      2. Leave earlier so that you won't have to ride so fast.

      And I do believe that for distances below 15km a car is overkill to transport a single person.

      I'll grant one thing: I live in the Netherlands, and I can reach almost all I need (work, shopping, entertainment) within 45 minutes by bike, and our roads are (mostly) optimised for bike traffic.


      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    12. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by -_broken_watchman_- · · Score: 1

      Tell me... how did they moderate as +5 a message saying... "he is a lazy bastard" ?

      Do moderators like being called this? is nice? is polite? is that what you get writing to Slashdot?

    13. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Snodgrass · · Score: 1

      You know, I got a good two-thirds of the way down the page and you were the first one to spell "pedal" correctly.

      For such a large group of know-it-alls, you'd think one of them would have a dictionary.

    14. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      E-bikes do:

      - Confer a speed advantage

      No. My top speed on flat ground biking is about 30 mph. If I don't want to be sweaty, 20 mph (coincidentally, about the top speed for an e-Bike). Thus, no speed advantage.

      - Often need to be pedaled in addition to electric power.

      Less than a real bike. Again with the denying the user exercise thing. It's a net loss.

      By they way, how do you get to work?

      I bike.

    15. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Koatdus · · Score: 1

      >An e-bike confers no speed advantage, at the cost of being environmetally unfriendly, and denying the user exercise.

      Steep hills. I sure as hell would not want to try to peddle up some of the hills around here.

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    16. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why is driving a car OK, riding a bike is OK, but riding an e-bike is lazy?

      Because an e-bike combines the disadvantages of both, thus many of us believe it's for people who don't have what it takes to be bicyclists. Bicycles have the advantage of moving completely under your own power. Cars have the advantage of safety, comfort, and carrying capacity (cargo or passengers). e-Bikes...hmm. No, nothing.

    17. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      driving a fecking car is NOT OK.

    18. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For being touted as "the grand scheme of things," your analysis is pretty thin.

      For one thing, you are ignoring the question of where food comes from vs. where coal comes from. Food is sustainable; coal is not (at least not on human timescales). It takes far less energy to create food than it does to create coal (which should be self-evident, because in a sense coal is made from food, i.e., organic matter, plus time and energy). The difference is that it doesn't cost humans anything to make coal. We just have to find it.

      So you're really making an economic argument, not a scientific one. I agree that coal is economically more efficient than food, calorie for calorie, at least at this time in history. But when comparing e-bikes with ordinary bikes, calorie expenditure is not constant. A rider on an e-bike requires a minimum of 15-30% more calories to get from point A to point B than the same rider on an ordinary bike, due to the differences in mass, friction, etc.

      And of course, there are other factors, such as pollution from coal vs. pollution from food, stopping distance (i.e. safety), and maintenance costs, none of which come out in favor of e-bikes.

    19. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great get an e-bike, one less car!

      Be aware that you will sacrifice speed and handling. When commuting you need all the mobility you can get.

      Have fun, Ill see you on the road.

    20. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      if you are lazy you would drive a car
      Well, an e-bike costs about two orders of magnitude less than a car, so you don't have to work as hard to afford one!
    21. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by drew · · Score: 1

      off topic, i know, but fyi, my wife and i wanted to buy a prius when we needed a new car about 6 months ago- the waiting list for a new prius was over a year long in every state. of course the dealer immediately offered us a used 2001 prius for almost the same price that the new ones are selling for.

      we ended up with a corolla- not quite as unique looking, but it cost much less and has still made over 35mpg on every tank of gas so far.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    22. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      The poor guy asks for advice building an e-bike, and 50% of the +3 comments are "Why don't you just peddle (you lazy f*ck)?" Because I'm sure that thought NEVER CROSSED HIS MIND. Ever.

      You must be new here :)

      Most ask.slashdot.org questions can be summarized into one of two categories:

      1) How can I go about doing X in some way that is freer|linuxier|geekier than the way the rest of the world does it?

      or

      2) I would like to ask slashdot something that I can just throw into a google search -- my question is ... ?

      I guess you and I are the silent minority that thinks before writing/speaking or whatever.

    23. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know of a 62 year old guy with an e-bike who commutes...I dare say that he would not be able to ride a regular bike to and from work. Let's not judge the health/choices of people we don't know.

      For all the /. how are criticizing the first poster for being lazy and being oh so holier than thou: maybe you should be running to work? You know how much energy it takes to make the aluminium that goes into a bike? Talk about environmental unfriendliness! And I can bet that running 12 miles a day would certainly burn off that lard-ass.

      I think the original poster brought up some really interesting technical issues (battery energy density etc.). From the looks of things very few of us techno geeks actually have anything useful to contribute.

      And yes,, I bike to work. 1993 Gary Fisher Tasajara, rigid, fenders, Nashbar Townie panniers http://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?category=66&sub category=1004&brand=&sku=8641&storetype=&estoreid= &pagename= for grocery runs, slicks etc.

    24. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      30, huh? Not too bad, if true. Of course, unless you're a Lance Armstrong, you can't *sustain* 30, even assuming clear roads, where as an ebike being pedaled can sustain higher speeds than that. Sounds like a speed advantage to me.

      You can put away the strawman about denying user exercise now. First of all, we are talking relative to a car, not relative to a normal bike, and just about anything is more exercise than that. No matter how you look at it, it's a net gain in exercise and a net cut in pollution.

      I somehow doubt you bike to work, and wonder if you even own a bike. How about backing up claims with facts? Maybe a URL of your bike logs? I don't seriously cycle anymore because I live too far from work to bicycle (it would take hours, and the return trip in the dark wouldn't be all that safe) and what free time I have is better spent with my kids. However, when I used to be serious, I kept a log, as did many others I knew. Surely if you are not just an AC trying to put down others who are doing something positive in order to inflate your own (unearned) sense of importance, you can present us with some evidence?

      Oh, and do log in when you do it.

      You'll excuse me now, I think I feel the need to go out and trade in my economy car for a nice big fat pickup with a V-8 to help use up the oil supply sooner :-)

      (While that is a troll, it isn't, btw, as whacky as it sounds: what will it take to make the car companies and the oil companies and everybody get really, really, really serious about developing truly usable alternative energy sources for vehicles? The impending end of the oil supply; nothing less. Since there is still plenty of oil in the ground, a good century's worth or more, they aren't terribly serious about alternative fuels yet. When they only have ten or fifteen years of known reserves left, then you will Serious.)

    25. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong! Unless you have a DIY electric bike like the slipstream, http://www.econvergence.net/emb.htm, you just aren't going to go 30MPH.

      Bikes in most of the USA are legally limited to 20 MPH. Those in many other countries are limited to about 15 MPH (25 kph). In any case most cut off the electric motor when you reach 20 MPH unless you tweak them http://www.chargerbike.com/tech/speed.html

      There is currently one that sells for off road uses that doesn't will go 25 MPH http://tidalforce.com/products/m750x/specs.html $2749 is a bit steep, and it's still not legally allowed on streets and bike lanes. Knowing that the US is filled with scofflaws, I expect to see these soon.

    26. Re:Good lord...welcome to slashdot by syphax · · Score: 1

      WTF?

      I have ridden my (normal) bike up the Galibier and L'Alpe d'Huez in the same day, and have run 2 marathons in under 3 hours (and a 1/2 marathon in under 1:18). But because I sometimes like to ride an e-bike around town when running errands, I don't 'have what it takes'?

      E-bike advantages:

      - I don't sweat much- so I don't have to take 5 showers a day
      - Convenient parking
      - I'm not going to kill anyone if I hit them accidentally
      - Minimal (non-human) energy use

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
  30. an observation about the OSS crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i dont know how many comments ive see that say something like "why dont you just peddle the bike and forget about the e-bike stuff"

    making jokes about being Tubby and this and that..

    this is a common (but unfortunate) attitude i often find in the OSS community at large (bad pun, i know)

    the question is NOT "what do you think about e-bikes" or "do you like the idea of ..."

    the question is about how to build one regardless of your opinion on the matter.

    i often encounter this attitude in IRC aswell somebody asks a question about how to use a program and people say things like "what you are trying to do is stupid, you shouldnt be doing that at all, instead you should " rather than helping the person do what it is they are asking about in the first place.

    point is: if you dont have something constructive to say that helps the person asking the question they are posing to you, butt out and let people who are actually interested in the specific topic in question to help add productive comments to the thread.

    1. Re:an observation about the OSS crowd by Scarblac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't agree. If someone asks you for help doing something that is obviously stupid, you should tell them that it is stupid and why, and not help them do it - that's not "helping" at all!

      I agree that that's not the case here (saying e-bikes are always a bad idea is just wrong), but it is true of, for instance, some programming questions people ask, probably similar to the "OSS" stuff you're talking about.

      If someone has variables named x0, x1, x2, x3, x4 etc and wants to do strange hacks with introspection and manipulation of namespace tables etc to change them all inside a loop, but has no idea how to do that - you don't explain how it could be done, you tell him "you don't want to do that, use a list" (I'm thinking of Python things). That is constructive.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    2. Re:an observation about the OSS crowd by hughbar · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree with this..it's a shame because it prevents new or less experienced folks from asking questions.

      Often their fresh view means that they ask 'good' questions. Anyway, really, there are no 'bad' questions.

      --
      On y va, qui mal y pense!
    3. Re:an observation about the OSS crowd by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1
      point is: if you dont have something constructive to say that helps the person asking the question they are posing to you, butt out and let people who are actually interested in the specific topic in question to help add productive comments to the thread.

      Good attitude, now, who wants to point me to a source of information on torturing kittens and blowing the heads off dogs with homemade explosives? If someone also has a source of sarin gas I can use that would be jubbly.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    4. Re:an observation about the OSS crowd by students · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just browse at +5?

      J/K, Please don't flame.

    5. Re:an observation about the OSS crowd by Mordaximus · · Score: 1
      ...you don't explain how it could be done, you tell him "you don't want to do that, use a list" (I'm thinking of Python things). That is constructive.

      No, that isn't constructive, I personally find that a little rude. "You don't want to do that because of $REASONS, use a list instead because of $BENEFITS" is constructive, thoughtful and sensitive. Never tell someone they're wrong, without explaining why. Spending the extra few seconds to explain your position means they've left knowing that they would have taken the wrong approach and why your's is a better one.

      For bonus points try starting it with "I used to do that all the time too, but..." or "I can see why you'd try that but..."

    6. Re:an observation about the OSS crowd by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      One problem is that the only people I see that have electric or gas powered scooters are the ones that shouldn't have them for health reasons.

      I do agree that motorcycles, scooters and powered bikes are still better than cars, but they just aren't viable for daily transportation in my area.

    7. Re:an observation about the OSS crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I often encounter the opposite attitude in the working world. People give people exactly the information they asked for, regardless of whether or not it's the information they need. That's not constructive. If someone is going about the problem in entirely the wrong way, you tell them. It saves pain in the long run.

    8. Re:an observation about the OSS crowd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Did you read the rest of his post? Maybe the first paragraph?
      I don't agree. If someone asks you for help doing something that is obviously stupid, you should tell them that it is stupid and why, and not help them do it - that's not "helping" at all!

      He omitted the "why" from the list example for brevity.

    9. Re:an observation about the OSS crowd by bleppie · · Score: 1

      Bump this response.

      Many people see the question as merely another opportunity to espouse their personal dogma.

  31. The sad truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The sad truth about "e-bikes", and designs similar to it, is that they're too fruity for a guy to be caught dead on! Seriously, if I'm going to take the extreme risk of riding a donorcycle it might as well be a manly thing.

    Mod me down, but everybody knows it's true. Only in asia are these fruity moped-ish bikes socially acceptable.

    1. Re:The sad truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They're popular in other parts of the world besides just asia.

      Also, these bikes are not that "fruity" you vain conformist homophobe fuckwad!

    2. Re:The sad truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I solved that problem. I added a Currie US PRO drive to a standard mountain bike. 17mph on flats with a distance of about 19 miles per charge if I don't peddle. Cheaper than an E-bike and not fruity looking.

      And to all the asswipes mocking this guy for not wanting to peddle, let me tell you the type of people who have made those types of comments to me in person. 1) Overweight, every single one without exception. 2) Drives cars to work. No problem with them getting in a big ass air polluting car and hauling their overweight asses to work, but if I want to put a motor on my bike and ride through clean electric power, why I have to hear your bullshit. 3) False sense of machismo. They talk macho, but they are about as masculine as that guy who does the "sweating to the oldies" workout videos.

      The really short answer for why you would want an electric bike over peddling is it does not look good to show up for work drenched in sweat and needing a fricking shower. It is not professional. Those of you who really do peddle bike, I'm sorry to tell you this, unless you are showering after you get to work, your odor is offensive to the people around you and people are talking about you when you're not around. So while you may not be contributing to outdoor pollution, you are fouling up the indoor environment for your co-workers.

      I've been using my electric mountain bike for close to 3 years now. Contrary to the idiots who talk out their ass about things here, you actually will get in better shape. You will still find yourself peddling at times to get higher speeds, and it still requires strength and dexterity to maneuver the thing around. It is still exercise, it's just light exercise, as opposed to tour de body odor exercise.

      Great thing about the currie kit: I can maintain it just like a normal mountain bike, and the motor system is trivial to maintain. It's also hackable too.

  32. OH! E is for electric! by Ambush_Bug · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought he was talking about making a bike that
    distributed WiFi... like this:

    http://www.magicbike.net/

    I read half the discussions about being a fat ass before
    I realized what the hell was going on...

    that'll teach me not to follow the links.

  33. lazy cunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just ride it with l-power, lose weight, get fit and stop being such a dick. mmmkay?

  34. Why not add some gadgets? by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not add gadgets to a regular bike? Like say a Palm Pilot or a GPS? That would, IMO make it an E-bike. If you are looking for an electric bike, then why not build an electric motorbike or perhaps a scooter?

    I mean, having a bike and NOT moving it under your own power (Kinetic or Potential energy here) really defeats the purpose.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:Why not add some gadgets? by julesh · · Score: 1

      The point of an electrically-assisted bike is so that you both get some of the exercise and improve your top speed so the trip doesn't take as long. I doubt he's just going to sit there and not pedal at all.

  35. Re:work those pounds off! by preposterity · · Score: 0

    Tubby? The name "Tubby" is hurtful, as my weight problem is glandular.

    Are you going to eat that pretzel?

    linky

  36. Check out Wilderness Energy and Largo Scooters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out

    http://www.wildernessenergy.com

    They have a nice kit. But if you want better quality, for about $160 more you can get the Go Hub kit from:

    http://www.largoscooters.com/stealthkits.html

    Also here is a great site for reports on EBikes:

    http://www.visforvoltage.com

  37. Check out these electric bikes by mrbnsn · · Score: 2, Informative
    Conversion, consmerzion. If you're going to go electric, go in style.

    http://www.beauty-fly.com/cpzs.asp
    http://www.biliqi.com.cn/cpjs01.htm
    http://www.cnqianjiale.com/c-chanpin1.htm

  38. need parts by JANYAtty. · · Score: 1

    Any ideas where I can get a small electric motor to drive an ebike? I dont want to do the hub centric thing.

    --
    I dont do meaning of life questions.
    1. Re:need parts by SLOviper · · Score: 1

      You can read my post under yours for more info, but the short answer to your question is http://www.robotmarketplace.com/.

      I would recommend the "EV Warrior" motor for price-performance or the "MagMotors" if budget isn't such an issue.

      --
      In theory, theory always works in practice. In practice, theory rarely works. <><
  39. E-bike / BattleBots by SLOviper · · Score: 5, Informative

    After getting into BattleBots years ago, I decided to reduce my commute to college (before I graduated) by building an electric scooter out of "spare" parts. It's not an e-bike from the standpoint that I didn't want to have to input any energy into the system myself (i.e. the motors had to do all the work). For cost and simplicity reasons, I chose to go with SLA (sealed lead acid) batteries and a couple of overvolted motors. With the proper timing, I achieved a flat speed of 16.5 MPH on two 1HP motors. With 64Ah (@12V) of Pb-acid chemistry onboard (this weighed a whopping 50 pounds), I had a maximum range (tested on all terrain including large hills) of just over 12 miles.

    That's what I did and perhaps you can learn from what I would have done differently. First off, I would have used NiMh batteries. This would have cut the weight in more than half and also would have allowed me to customize the pack more both in shape and capacity (I only needed to go 9 miles in a day). The only downside to this was the charge time. SLA batteries are pretty indestructible and I could charge the full 64Ah in around an hour. With NiMh, you're talking about several hours or less if you don't mind compromising lifespan (with the right charger you could charge the same capacity in NiMh in the same time if you didn't mind getting only ~100 charges out of your packs). If I had the cash, I would probably use the high capacity, high discharge Li-Ion batteries from PowerStream (http://www.powerstream.com/LL.htm) as they would be incredibly light (~10 pounds for the same capacity).

    As far as the motors went, I was fairly satisfied with the power output, but would have liked more. If you compare it to a car (~100HP for ~2000 pounds), you should have ~10-15HP available for the same performance. Now with electric motors, due to their differing torque curves (in comparison to internal combustion engines), you can achieve similar results from significantly less overall horsepower, but I still would have preferred having 3-6HP on my project.

    Of course, if you go with high output motors, you need a speed controller capable of handling the current. And if you go with the Li-Ion batts, you need a fairly expensive charger.

    You can take a look at some basic pics of my scooter at:
    http://sloviper.com/hobbies/scooter/index.html

    A good place for parts is:
    http://www.robotmarketplace.com/

    Cheap Ni-Mh batteries can be found at:
    http://www.batteryspace.com/
    I have used them in BattleBots before and they hold up decently, almost as well as the "expensive" ones from http://www.battlepack.com/

    If you have any specific questions, feel free to contact me. I love discussing this sort of thing and have had tons of experience. :-)

    --
    In theory, theory always works in practice. In practice, theory rarely works. <><
    1. Re:E-bike / BattleBots by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      I dunno, your power requirements seem to be a little on the high side.

      Eg. 1 horsepower is 750W. An average human can sustain about 200W continuous. So on a flat road, or average slopes (depending on extra weight) a single 1HP motor should give you at least more speed than what your average person can put out.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:E-bike / BattleBots by SLOviper · · Score: 3, Informative

      The HP rating is peak, so that's what the motors give basically at stall. Under normal operation, each of them can output (consume) ~1/4 HP (187W) continuously without overheating. Then there's the fact that they only run ~70% efficient and the most significant loss (other than wind friction) of the friction drive instead of a belt/chain (probably the biggest thing I would do differently if I were to redesign).

      So you are correct, the raw numbers are high. I'm just so used to using "max" numbers from designing BattleBots where it's all about maxing out everything but only to the point where it will still run for 3 minutes. :-)

      (Using "max" numbers also makes it easier in sourching parts as in my experience most everything is rated at or near peak values.)

      --
      In theory, theory always works in practice. In practice, theory rarely works. <><
  40. To be fair... by sapgau · · Score: 1

    It really didn't sound practical at first: over 15 lbs. of gear, around 25 min. or 50 kms in range.

    Maybe there are a bunch of motivated e-bikers out there but apparently Slashdot is only concerned in the other type of "e".

    Good luck!

  41. Re: Magicbike.net by Ghostgate · · Score: 1

    Heh, look at the yellow road sign on that site and the thing coming out of the back of the bike. Is it just me, or does it look like the bike rider is doing something OTHER than distributing wifi? ;)

  42. I'm not one to bite by zoloto · · Score: 1

    but i can undeerstand your frustration. however, try constructively saving this kind of arguement for when you can have a clear head and then review your post, remove the antagonising tone putting it to a postive light and then, only then, posting it.

    it'll serve you well. and probably land you that job you wanted.

  43. iBike by bgackle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not make an iBike? It would be slightly more expensive, but much sleeker and more stylish.

    --
    What we really need is a ten day waiting period and a background check before you can buy a congressman.
    1. Re:iBike by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Strange but true, one of the early codenames for the Macintosh project was intended to be "Bicycle." I believe it was Steve Jobs who wanted it called that.

      Reference: Bicycle vs. Macintosh(The Unofficial Apple Weblog)

  44. Must have for Young Geeks: by fons · · Score: 2, Informative


    I wish these existed when I was younger. So cool!
    http://www.hokeyspokes.com/

    I can't wait to have kids so i can buy them stuff like this :)

    1. Re:Must have for Young Geeks: by kgbspy · · Score: 1

      Who needs kids to get 'em? It says THEY CAN DISPLAY MESSAGES! Imagine the possibilities!!!

      "fuck....... you.................. motorist......"

      --
      ~
      ~
      ~
      -- INSERT --
  45. BikeE by ouzel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You could install one of these on a BikeE (Google cache of related pages) and be the first kid on the block to have an EbikeBikeE!

  46. Bikes suck for cargo and mountains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I live in Pittsburgh... hazardous roads with human size potholes, everyone driving an SUV and utter lack of cycle friendly road width...

    I was considering the same idea...cycling to work and the local grocery seems utterly rewarding... However, bicycles lack meaningful space to stash the groceries or to put your notebook computer...

    To solve those problems, I found this excellent sub-frame bolt on that gives you essentially storage/trunk space. I own and ride one now.. Works very well and give the bike a better stability going over rough road.

    See: http://www.xtracycle.com

    Since Pittsburgh is part of a chain of mountains, getting anywhere consumes tons of energy regardless of your power source... For instance, the hills around my valley are 200-400ft inclines over say 1/2 - 1 full mile area.. steep stuff... With cargo, these hills would eat even an active cycler...

    In comes the motor options... Pennsylvania being the backwards ass place it is treats bicyclists like troublemakers with all sorts of limitations on where you can go (not on highways) and how you can be cited... Anything with a motor other than farm equipment requires you to have a license and deal with the financial exploitation of say insurance...

    So the way to go I belive is a pedal-assist that looks like a bicycle.... This way you get your exercise and help the motor pull you while benefiting from aid of the motor... Obviously, most E-bikes look like some weird concept and that is bound to take your local cops about one glance to start bothering you as if you were a 12 year old on one of those mini bikes..

    Well, the electric bikes aren't very appealing at current... maybe the power could be used to run lights at night time instead... Batteries weigh a ton and every ounce matters on a bicycle... The alternative is gasoline...

    Gasoline while not being ideal, is not really any more or less green than gas as a majority of it still is produced from COAL here in the US.

    What really matters is miles per gallon and the ability to really go as far as you want... This is the same thing holding back electric cars for 30 years.. No one can deal with limiting their trip to say 30 mile range... It isn't that folks use more in a trip, but in like that cellphone that you always forget to recharge, a dead car would leave you stranded.

    I've been back and forth with a company called Golden Eagle Bike Engines... Nice belt driven kits that seems to go really well (30+ MPH) and really long (250 MPG)... Their kit get's wonderful reviews and is short on my buy list...

    See: http://www.bikeengines.com/

    It seems most posters and lousy bicycle stuff happens in the US, say except the left coast.... California up to Washington... While across the pond, Europe is buzzing with cycles both motorized and people powered...

    1. Re:Bikes suck for cargo and mountains... by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      For whatever it's worth, I live in Pittsburgh too and I don't own a car and I commute and travel full-time on my bicycle. My housemates have cars and my boyfriend has a car and I sometimes take advantage of that, but in general I ride my bike everywhere.

      My next step is to get panniers so I don't have to depend on others for grocery trips and things of that nature. That, and winter weather gear; I can't wait for snow.

  47. Less stressful?! by Organism · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You have to be kidding. Cycling through rush hour traffic, the opportunity for some bleary eyed, hung over burger flipper to flatten me with his peugot 206 presents itself several thousand times. The odds aren't good; you have to be on your guard every second.

    --
    -- My hovercraft is full of eels.
    1. Re:Less stressful?! by XemonerdX · · Score: 1

      Experienced rush hour cyclists are like fish, they always make sure to be in the middle of the flock/school as much as possible so that others may get hit 1st, reducing one's chance of getting hurt...

  48. Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf is an e-bike?

  49. Radio Flyer cycle by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 5, Funny

    I tricked my bike out with an old 2M radio bolted to the handlebars, 6V golf cart battery under the seat, and a whip antenna attached to the frame, down by the rear axle, running up like one of those flags

    I have worked at three bike shops as a mechanic. One in the country, one in the city, and one in Sweden. At EACH AND EVERYONE, I have had at least one customer who had welded, screwed, or zip-tied a HAM or CB-type radio to their bicycle. I would like an explaination you sick HAM bastards! Why do you have to demand a better word for "weird"???

    1. Re:Radio Flyer cycle by gorehog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Erm...you reminded me of something from my Dad's old 73 magazines, and here it is, The Winnebiko! There's more if you google +ham +bike ---KC2MMW

    2. Re:Radio Flyer cycle by zardinuk · · Score: 0

      I've seen guys with portable (dipole antenna and all fits in a daypack) morse code transcievers communicating with people on the other side of the world. It's pretty interesting being able to do satellite communications with a little man powered box and a piece of wire.

      Only thing 2M bands are good for is seeing who can outblast the other guy with their megawatt transcievers and upset everyones TV reception in a 5 mile radius.

      --

      "What the superior man seeks is in himself; what the small man seeks is in others."
      - Confucius

  50. Predictably... by Alioth · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...there are already dozens of comments saying "Why don't you peddle your bike to work you lazy bastard".

    It's PEDAL, not peddle! Peddling is marketing. Pedaling is using your feet on the pedals of a bicycle.

    1. Re:Predictably... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth was this predictable? I see a lot of native English speakers misspell words as other words they sound like (your, you're etc), but I have NEVER seen it on this scale before.

      What's wrong with you guys?!?

      Hmm. If more than 50% of native speakers misspell a word, does that make it correct by definition?

      Put the peddle to the mettle, d00dz.

    2. Re:Predictably... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Put the peddle to the mettle, d00dz.

      Surely you meant "medal".

  51. Back in my day... by ImaLamer · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...when the same comment was made over and over we modded them Redundant.

    That being said... in your day did the people at work like smelling the sweat of someone who has just biked to work?

    Someone has already pointed this out, so I'm being redundant, but there are two sides to everything. Maybe the person doesn't want to smell like a wet dog when he gets to work. I'm sure there is some cycling involved, but the point is to keep it to a minimum. Quit judging him. I bet you drive to work, likely an SUV.

    1. Re:Back in my day... by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      I don't know how out of shape you guys are, but a 10 mile ride should not make you a sweaty mess unless you are really chugging to get there. In summer it may be an issue, but it should be no worse than sitting in a hot car before the AC kicks on or waiting for the subway in a sweltering station.

    2. Re:Back in my day... by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      It in part depends on the area of the country you are in. In Florida, with the heat and humidity year round, cycling is not an option if you don't want to stink.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  52. If you really don't want to peddle.... by beakburke · · Score: 1

    buy a GEM car. You can carpool too.

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  53. Pedal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You lazy fuck!

  54. Why an e-bike? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    OK, electric vehicles are nice for keeping the local air clean in crowded California, but once you've allowed for generator efficiency (30-40%) and substantial transmission losses, you might as well have a small petrol engine. Same CO2 emissions at the end of the day.

    Unless you can guarantee your e-bike is charged using hydro/nuclear/wind power, but most electricity still comes from good old fashioned dino compost.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  55. Aprilia Enjoy ebike - not enjoyable at all by Zhlobko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was seduced by the idEa of an Ebike about 18 months ago.

    I bought an Aprilia enjoy ebike.

    This was not a Harley, but was certainly a fat and useless hog.

    What a dog!!! about 4 (four!!!) km range going up and down hills here in Sydney.

    So...I did what some other reader here suggested...bought myself a super duper light mountain bike, stuck some thin style phat boy kevlar tyres...pump'D them to 100 psi.

    Man! You don't need a motor.

    Float like a butterfly instead of riding the Hog.

    Get a real bike. Should fuel cells...or flying cars ever emerge..then pigs too might fly.

  56. Some better sources. by justin_le · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi, I would avoid trying to deal with Golden Island Motor directly for ordering a single conversion kit, they don't do the english/communicating thing very well and the cost to wire transfer and ship just one hub motor will exceed the listed kit price considerably. You can get very similar value hub motors that are distributed locally through http://www.wildernessenergy.com/ and http://www.evsolutions.net/, a supplier of the http://www.crystalyte.com/. These are all direct drive motors, no gears to wear out and perfectly silent, but also fairly heavy for their power output.

    I've also ordered reasonably cheap hub motors from http://www.elebike.com.tw/. They have an interesting selection including some internally geared models, and are quick to respond to queries.

    Good Batteries continue to be the biggest hurdle for DIY e-bike experimenters because even though there are tons of asian companies that reportedly make them for cheap, there are simply no local suppliers. If you don't mind trying to import from China, some companies to check out:
    1 http://www.peacebay.com/,
    2 http://http//www.hyperbattery.com,
    3 http://splendidbattery.com/,
    4 http://www.gmbattery.com/,
    5 http://www.thunder-sky.com/en/index.htm

    Personally haven't ordered from 1 or 2 yet, 3 has very reasonably priced lithium polymer ($.82/watt-hour) and NiMH ($.40/w-hr) packs and will sell in individual qunatities. My favorite so far are the prismatic NiMH packs from 4, GMBattery, because you can access each individual cell and restack them easily. Finally there is the infamous thundersky who have lithium-ion batteries for less than most companies' NiMH. Their old 10Ah 36V setup had no protection circuitry and a few problems, but their new 20Ah 36V ebike pack looks a bit more reputable. Note that the 24V 4Ah NiMH packs from batteryspace.com that someone recomended are GARBAGE. Ours turned out to have only 2.6 Ah capacity and couldn't deliver more than about 5 amps. If you buy from batteryspace, be sure to get the 30Amp high rate pack.

    Lead acid isn't really that bad if you're generally doing ~20km ish trips so you can get away with lower capacity pack. NiMH has about twice the energy density, and Lithium packs are 2-3 times better than NiMH.

    I see a lot of people here have misconceptions about ebikes and exercise. I find I pedal as hard or harder riding an assisted bicycle than a regular bike. The difference is that I move at 42km/hr instead of 26, I don't slow down on the hills, and no matter how hard I work I don't get sweaty because the breeze at those speeds is so strong. This is a much overlooked fact of ebiking, the wind keeps you cool and dry.

    Justin Lemire-Elmore
    1. Re:Some better sources. by Southpaw018 · · Score: 1

      Heh. On the communication issue for the all-in-one-kit:

      Speed: 0-36kpm

      36 kilometers per minute is a little over 1342 miles per hour. Methinks something's wrong here ;)

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    2. Re:Some better sources. by Suidae · · Score: 1

      36 kilometers per minute is a little over 1342 miles per hour. Methinks something's wrong here

      But on the off chance that the GP is correct, you may want to invest in a polycarbonate fairing, bugstrikes at that speed would be a little rough on the complexion.

  57. why doesn't anyone... by v1z · · Score: 1

    consider that with an e-bike this guy can "roll" to work, and exercise on his way home ? All that's left is the battery-problem -- but if he resues the one from his car, then he really doesn't hurt the environment, does he ?

    (Oh, ok, so he probably can't do that easily, and either the car would have to be left to rust, or he'd have to get a new battery for it -- but what got me was everyone doing the: Exerecise=Smell=fatburning!=drive=lazy=nosmell-thi ng.)

    1. Re:why doesn't anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not get a bigass flywheel and just keep it spinning. I'd only peddle my ass if there was some serious money involved.

  58. iEBike, or an Eibike, or an EieBikeI..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What combination of I and E would be the collest
    for my bike?

  59. Still less dorky than a Segway Human Transporter by Ezza · · Score: 2, Funny

    and hellava lot cheaper too!

    --
    I'm a perfectionist but I'm trying to cut back.
  60. Just let us get on with what we do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you actually imagine *anything* being posted here and these people *not* replying? The articles are just the seed for the bickering. It's what Slashdot is aaaaall about.

    And another thing, newbies are the only people who would bother posting an Ask Slashdot question, because they haven't learned yet that their great ideas for questions will always be ignored.

  61. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PARENT IS A ****************copied******************* post.

    MOD DOWN THE PLAGIARIST.

  62. Skip Electric, Go Gas Powered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, find out about local laws before spending money on anything; you may find that paying to hang a motor on a bicycle might not be worth the hassle where you live. Many places consider mopeds and motorized bicycles to be operated the same as bicycles, with no licensing or registration required. Other places require registration, licensing or both.

    Secondly, if you do this, skip the electrics: the gas ones have much more power and range than the electrics and are still very cheap to operate, and you can still pedal the bike manually if you want. Plus: no recharging time! Just gas it up and go, anytime. As to buying a "real" moped, new ones are rather more expensive than a motorized bicycle, and old ones can be difficult to find parts for. Mopeds can be pedalled manually of course, but they aren't really meant for it and so aren't really good for it--it's just a legality required of the vehicle classification. If you want the option of exercise, a motorized bicycle is the better way to go.

    ...Incidentally, there's two main technical requirements of mopeds or motorized bicycles: that they have an engine of less than 2 horse power, and that they have pedals to allow manually propelling the vehicle without using the engine. The second reason is the reason that nearly all these current trendy electric and gas-powered mini-scooters are not street legal.

    -fini-

  63. E-bike not for geeks by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a geek site. You're a geek, I'm a geek, we're all...

    As a geek you need body activity because sitting behind the screen just doesn't get you any. So get yourself a regular/racing/mountain bike.

    Within a couple of weeks you notice a better condition and an increasing average speed. And, if you really need to, you can add a cardio/speedometer to increase the geeky factor.

    As a real geek you could also get into the details of bike training. The different body types and their specialties, the different goals in training (muscle building, endurance, agility, fat burning etc...), the food to take etc, etc...

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  64. I'm a cyclist and I think it's not such a bad idea by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I have been biking to work now for almost a year. I've long since gotten in shape, and I have no problems with hills or smelling at work (just change cloths, it takes 1 minuet).

    But there are days I just don't feel upto it. Seriously. Sometimes I just didn't get enough sleep, sometimes I'm sick (though rarely thanx to all that regular exercise), and sometimes I'm bruised from falling off my bike. So some times I'm just not capable of putting out that much effort.

    It would be nice to have something that could pick up the slack. "Help" pedal as it were so that I can still ride my bike, even when I don't have the energy. There may be days when I don't have the energy to ride, but there is never a day that I don't want to ride.

    That and for longer inter-city trips, some kind help would also be good.

    But batteries don't have any where near the power density for longer intercity trips. And the system ways so much that it's more of a burden than a help on daily commutes. (since most days you won't need it)

    I know I'll get flaimed for it, but what about a small petrol/gas motor? Easy to refule, there often made light weight, and have the power to make a real difference in both scenarios.

  65. Re:OH! E is for electric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever you do, don't lock your magicbike up with your Kryptonite U-lock.

  66. A possible alternative by ryanhos · · Score: 2, Informative

    A project a friend of mine was involved in a project that designed and built a hybrid pedal-electric bike with regenerative capabilities. Only down side is that it doesn't use a hub motor, so there's more to mount on the bike than just the batteries and control module.

    http://www.iit.edu/~ipro315/Fall2003/Calendar.ht m

    They got a sweet frame donated from Santa Cruz because they sponsor my friend in triathalons and bike races. I don't know if the project is currently operating, but if you'd like to know more, I can put you in touch with the people from the project. Just drop me an email.

    --
    "I threw up my hands in disgust and wondered if it had been such a good idea to have eaten my hands in the first place."
  67. E as in bike, not as in mail by TheAcousticMotrbiker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know,

    when I read the subject and frontpage bit, i thought he was building a bike, that took care of his email needs, and had a build in laptop, and other geeky /. type of stuff.

    It turns out however to be the other kind of E (lectric iso lectronic)

    Have you considered a moped type bike ?

  68. Re:I'm a cyclist and I think it's not such a bad i by benzapp · · Score: 1

    Well, you have to admit, its a rarity you can't/don't want to bike to work.

    Does it make sense to buy a motorized bicycle for this purpose? Especially when you can take the subway/bus/cab?

    I guess if you are in the middle of nowhere, where truly you hae to own your own transportation, this could work. But in the vast majority of places, there ARE other options that are more expensive than biking, and nowhere near as fast (during typical rush hour conditions)... but thats why we bike.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  69. I like what I've heard about this motor kit by birk_man · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have been considering the e-bike idea (when my office moves to the far end of the city next spring). I haven't done alot of shopping yet but one of the best add-on units I've seen so far seems to be the BionX system http://www.eps-system.com/en/ . The one bike shop guy that I talked to said it was a very smooth system (compared to a Giant Lafree that he bought earlier). But it is a little expensive. :(

    1. Re:I like what I've heard about this motor kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, sounds a lot like this one, http://www.chargerbike.com/

      I don't think hub motors are necessarily the best way to go.

  70. Here's a write up on an ebike, hasn't by cmefford · · Score: 2, Informative

    been updated in quite a while, but http://www.eruditium.org/cmefford/

  71. Power-assisted Mountain Bike by bender647 · · Score: 1

    At a recent Aprilia open house, I saw a power-assisted mountain bike. It only assisted -- when you stopped pedaling, it did nothing to help. But it had some intelligence as to how much effort your were exerting and you could dial it up or down if you needed. Unfortunately, I don't know anyone who owns one that could give a testimonial.

    1. Re:Power-assisted Mountain Bike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a cheaper one that's still selling http://www.chargerbike.com/

      Here's one that's much faster http://tidalforce.com/products/m750x/specs.html

  72. Try asking the Yahoo Group by bonius_rex · · Score: 1

    Yahoo has a newsgroup devoted to this type of thing. You might want to check with them.
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/power-assist/

  73. reminds me of a joke my grandfather told me once by HBI · · Score: 1

    A guy in the 1930's lost an eye in an industrial accident and after healing up a bit, went to see a specialist in prosthetics about a replacement. He was shown glass eyes that looked almost like the real thing, but were way out of his price league, this being the Depression.

    The salesman heard about the man's financial woes and said "Well, we do have some painted wooden eyes here. They were used back in the Civil War as a replacement. Here, i'll get one.". The man tried it on and was fitted with one. It wasn't perfect, but it was better than walking around looking like a pirate with an eye patch. Moreover, he could afford it. He left relatively happy.

    That night, he went to a dance. He got there a bit late and found all the ladies were dancing except for one. She was a little heavyset but otherwise attractive. So, with newfound confidence, he walked over and asked if she would like to dance. Dumbfounded, she answered, "Would I? Would I!". His face turned sour and he taunted her, "Fat ass! Fat ass!".

    Hey it was a 1930's joke, gimme a break.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  74. A quick grump about fuel cells by uniqueusername · · Score: 2, Informative

    Does someone want to donate a direct-conversion methanol fuel cell to the project?

    If you're interested in throwing a lot of money (yours or someone else's) into the project, you're better off going with an advanced battery chemistry, like lithium ion or nimh. The fuel cell battery charger you pointed to delivers 50 watts. This would not be acceptable for moving a bike down the road, for the same reason that fuel cells are not [yet] acceptable for moving cars -- they require too much mass to generate enough power. At 6kg (without fuel) this fuel cell has a specific power of a little over 4 w/kg. Lithium ion can give over 350-400 w/kg, especially if packaged in large cells. And though specific energy is very high, lithium ion is actually considered fairly crappy in terms of power output, compared with other battery chemistries.

    MetricMind's lithium ion batteries are sized for a car, but their specs are useful as an example:

    http://metricmind.com/battery.htm

    And unless it runs on pure hydrogen, it emits exhaust. It's a little cleaner than a combustion engine, it's quiet, and a little more efficient (compared to burning the methanol and generating the electricity conventionally), but right now, batteries are just a better solution.

    I've recently had a chance to try out the WaveCrest TidalForce bike, powered by NiMH batteries. At 750W (approx 1HP), it's a pretty fun ride:

    http://tidalforce.com/

  75. Cities for bikes? by corvair2k1 · · Score: 1

    I currently live in a large Southern city with roads that are barely suitable for cars... Sidewalks are in bad shape, and you're likely to get killed if you try to share the road.

    What cities are going to be more bike-friendly? Is there a portion of the country that encourages this type of transportation?

    1. Re:Cities for bikes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get anywhere a car can (and lots of places it can't) in Juneau AK. Of course, you have mountains and rain to deal with but that's the problem of living in a rainforest....

  76. Biking FOR work by toumai · · Score: 1

    Try biking for work http://www.souppeddler.com/ best job I've ever had.

  77. Get off you lazy butt and use your two legs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you be anymore lazy? Next thing you will want to do is attach a motor to you lazyboy recliner chair and drive it to work. You could definitely use the exercise gained by a bike without a motor!

  78. Re:Cities for bikes? : Montreal, Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Montreal has more than 300 km of bike paths and bike lanes. A lot of people use bikes for commuting, even in winter.

  79. Good Foresight by ksemlerK · · Score: 1

    At the current rate of depletion, the global extraction rate for all petroleum is expected to arrive in 2005-2006. Any conservation of petroleum based fuels will only lessen the burden during the transition phase. For details on how the global oil crunch is unfolding, I suggest you do some research regarding peak oil. What you find will surprise you.

  80. Conversion kits for regular bikes by dborod · · Score: 1

    Zapworld.com sells a do-it-your-self kit to attach a battery pack and motor to your bicycle.

    It turns a regular bike into a battery-assisted bike for going faster, going up hills, etc.

    I would have gotten one years ago except I'm too short and the frame size of my bike isn't large enough to accommodate the batter pack.

  81. Finagle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why use electricity, anyway ? How about a tiny jet turbine burning methanol or butane ?

    Finagle, the patron saint of the Second Law, doesn't like low-entropy intermediates. Help stamp out electricity !

  82. because ya gotta! by zogger · · Score: 1

    I put an am/fm/cassette player radio AND a CB radio on my lawn tractor! I certainly understand the appeal to having a radio on a bicycle. I only have one hand held 2 meter, else I'd probably add one of those too. And I'm seriously contemplating adding a laptop or a 12 volt mini itx rig, for a variety of reasons. I also added an additional heavy truck battery in parallel with the tiny stock 12 volt battery that comes in those things, hung it on a rack off the rear of the thing where the additional weight greatly improves traction going up hill, it lets me tow my little work wagon better without using dumb wheel weights that add little functionality besides their weight. I use this thing almost daily working around the complex where I live.

    I think it's because once you get used to having full time communications of some sort, you feel nekkid without it. Or something.

    That's why we are geeks and nerds and not "straights". We think straight people are weird because if someone (society, consumer pressure brainwashing, etc) doesn't tell them to do something, they never do anything different, they are ultimate follow the herd mentality which gives us the buckwheats. It is hard coded DNA someplace, we as geeks and nerds have the "gotta do it no matter whut!" gene.

  83. I had an e-bike for several years. by Gldm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had the DX kit from ZAP for several years when I was at college in San Francisco. I had a number of interesting experiences.

    I opted for the dual battery kit because the claims of distance on a charge were optimistic by about a factor of two. I'm sure if you were on some ultralight bike riding on perfectly flat roads at low speed you could achieve the rated numbers, but in the real world cranking up twin peaks with both you and the motors straining for all you're worth it was alot shorter.

    The motor will become less efficient as it heats up. It will heat up as it has to provide more torque, so it will usually quit right on the steepest hill in your journey about the time you've become too tired to pedal the heavy bike without it. Then you'll walk the rest of the way up.

    If you have a friction drive like the zap kit did, where the motor drives the wheel via a roller that rides on the tire, it will be useless anytime the tire is wet, dusty, or you're going up a hill where it produces significant resistance. The solution I found to this was to install an extra gear shift on the handlebars, and run a line down the frame to a point opposite the motor. Then ran the cable to a convenient mounting hole in the motor casing so that when I pulled the lever the motor would be pulled into the tire. This let me keep traction in any condition, even snow. I showed this to some people from zap, and they thought it was great. But not great enough to put in their kits apparently. I also designed a roller that worked kind of like a thick spring that could change diameter with pressure so using this you could change gear ratios, but that never went anywhere either. If anyone wants the design to work on building it, let me know.

    It won't electrocute you or short out in the rain, even in El Nino, even if you're stupid and go out in El Nino and get drenched. Your brakes however, will fail when they're hydroplaning on your rims as you careen down into the Noe valley at breakneck speeds.

    Bike thieves will still steal your bike despite the fact they don't have the charger for it. Either that or someone will steal your battery and headlight and smash them in the street for no good reason. Kryptonite locks will not save you, it'll still be stolen even in broad daylight at a busy mall. I gave up after losing 2 bikes.

    If you have to transport it a long distance, like to another state, don't ship it, fly with it. Most airlines have a flat $50 bike fee, just get a bike box from the local bike shop and pack it. Pack your batteries seperately in your luggage on top, so you can show them to the people at the counter in the airport before they check your bag. Lead acid gel cells are safe for commercial airline trainsport, and will likely have this printed on the batteries themselves, as mine did.

    If you use the bike every day expect to replace your batteries every year or two, as they'll wear out.

    Beware of other cyclists, alot of them will be mad at you for "cheating".

    You'll hear lots of interesting things about better technologies, such as improved lithium ion batteries, and small fuel cells which are always "just around the corner". I waited and searched for 5 years to get either one. Even when they actually demonstrated a bike with the same kit as mine running on a li battery with half the weight and 6 times the range, they wouldn't sell it to me. They went on to make $450 laptop batteries instead and refused to license the tech to anyone interested in other applications and refused to build any other size or shape batteries unless you wanted like 100,000 units. As for the fuel cells, saw one on a bike too. But they were always experimental and "Oh we'll have this out in 2 years." It won't happen anytime soon.

    You'll also hear about new and improved electric vehicles that are

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  84. Here's my suggestion by zantispam · · Score: 1
    Here.

    Bloody moped pussies.

    --

    censorship is a form of noise, which actively seeks to drown out content with silence - Crash Culligan
  85. Re:I'm a cyclist and I think it's not such a bad i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (just change cloths, it takes 1 minuet).

    One French dance in triple time, of rustic origins but popular in the courts of 18th-century Europe.

    Come on, I don't have that kind of time (or talent).

  86. Re:I'm a cyclist and I think it's not such a bad i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'ma regular rollerblader. Eight miles roundtrip three days a week to/from work, 10-11 months of the year (In boston, Feburary is a little too cold to blade).
    I find the days when I'm exhausted are the days I feel the best after I exercise. Try it, you'll like it.

  87. good advice by ragnar · · Score: 1

    It is nice to see, in the midst of a bunch of off topic rants, an actual answer to the question. I'm a regular cyclist and used to do road racing, so I'll admit that I don't find the electric component to be compelling. You confirmed my suspicion that the added weight of the batteries becomes an albatross when the juice is low.

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
    1. Re:good advice by Gldm · · Score: 1

      It was still much much easier to get around with the electric assist than without. I had alot of difficulty getting anywhere before and after I had the motor. I'm not a dedicated athlete, I was a college student studying CS at the time. While I did some working out it certainly wasn't enough to keep me in good enough shape to constantly ride up and down the hills in SF.

      After awhile you get good at estimating how far you can go without running low on juice. I'd really like to see something with higher energy density like li batteries or fuel cells but it's just not happening. The market is too small for any of the people with that kind of tech to care about. If they were smart they'd develop it and then sell it to China.

      Oh and I forgot to mention one technology in the list. A decent system for hydrogen storage. Seriously, this guy has a great idea and it's easy to implement,but nobody seems to be taking him up on it. I'm not sure why.


      --

      Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

  88. Mixed bag for me by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    I am not an avid cyclist. I biked to and from work while I was co-opping in California because it didn't make sense to buy a car for 7 months up there and I was too young to rent a car at affordable rates. Recently, I picked up a $15 bike at a yard sale and have started biking to and from work and other various activities (works really nicely for those late-night bar visits. If I crash, it's at much slower speeds, not to mention that knowing I'll be biking home gives me good reason to drink less around closing time) when convenient. I don't reach speeds that even approach the speed limit generally and therefore, I feel leery about sitting in the middle of the lane. For one, people get really irate when someone's going less than the speed limit and will often blare the horn or unsafely pass you. For two, for all that I carry all the blinker stuff when out at night, I'd be bound to get rear-ended one day by some driver more concerned by his girlfriend on the cell phone or the hot coffee dumped on his lap (perhaps by irate girlfriend not on the cell phone). If there's a bike lane (None here in Newark, OH. It makes me really miss California...), I take that. Otherwise, there's usually some degree of extra space on the shoulder that I can ride, although that way is fraught with broken pavement, badly lipped culverts, and low-hanging branches, not to mention the detritus of a littering society. I avoid the sidewalk whenever possible, as I had it drummed into my head from a young age that bicycles are considered vehicles and therefore are illegal on sidewalks, much the same as cars. (I'm a strong believer in the bike-as-vehicle, subject to the same rights and rules as any vehicle on the road, ideally the same courtesy, but I'm not holding my breath) I do pull into the lane at stop lights, as I figure it's a good way of making sure a motorist doesn't turn right as I'm going straight, thereby broadsiding me. I also pull into the lane when there are turn lanes, generally riding the painted line of the demarcataion seperating the right-turn and stright lanes if such a beast exists. What's really unnerving for me is when you have to make a left turn on a two-lane road, particularly as the locals seem to feel that two-lane roads are highways with commensurate speed limits.

    So to summarize, I'm not going to take up a lane until my average speed is closer to a reasonable car speed, definitely not going to do it until my top speed at least reaches the speed limit. *shrug* Until then, I take as much advantage as I can of back roads, bike trails, and pedestrian bridges to avoid the main traffic routes.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Mixed bag for me by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

      I am a fairly avid bicyclist, about 4000 miles in the last year. Seven century (over 100 miles) rides this summer. If you join me for a ride, it'd take about 15 minutes to prove that I'm safer in the lane. When I'm on edge of the road cars assume the lane is theirs and don't move over at all, or they may move over a foot or two. When I'm in the lane, even just a couple of feet, cars give me the entire lane, or if they can't because of traffic they slow way down before passing. I'm not talking about the occasional "nice" driver, I'm talking about Dodge Ram pickups, semis, etc. When I'm on the edge of the road most cars pass within 2-3 feet of me and I have a lot more close calls. When I'm in the lane, I rarely have less than 10 feet of clearance. This would be clear to anyone in 10-15 minutes of riding.

      Occasionally, I'll find a road that has clean, wide shoulder. Then I'll happily ride it, but if it's rough or full of glass, then its not a safe option when I'm averaging 20 mph over several hours of riding.

  89. Buyer Beware! by cjsnell · · Score: 1

    Hey, before you go drop $1000 on an electric bike, you need to consider this question: who is going to work on your bike when it inevitably breaks? Scanning through the thread and looking at web pages, I can tell you that pretty much every one of these "e-Bikes" has an electric motor mounted on a department store-grade bicycle. The motor drive makes up the lion's share of the bike's cost and you are ending up with a cheap steel (probably not even chro-moly) frame, crappy no-name low-grade derailluers and heavy, poorly-constructed steel wheels.

    As a guy who grew up in his family's bicycle stores, let me tell you, I highly doubt that you are going to be able to find anybody to work on your e-bike when it breaks. Bike shops are usually reluctant to work on department store-grade bikes because you often end up breaking them even more when trying to fix them. Even if you have the mechanical skills to repair your own bike, the parts they use are often of non-standard size and replacements are not usually available. Keep in mind, I'm just talking about the bicycle that this e-bike is based on. When your local bike shop sees the motor on the wheel, they are going to cry.

    Please, do yourself a huge favor and go to your locally-owned bicycle store and pick yourself up a quality name-brand bicycle. We sell Trek, Klien, and Gary Fisher, but Specialized and Cannondale are also pretty good, too. For the price of your e-bike, you'll get a high quality aluminum frame, durable Shimano components, tough aluminum alloy wheels, and a friendly local dealer who will gladly repair your bike if it breaks. At our store, customers get a free 30-day tune-up and subsequent minor adjustments are generally free for the first couple of years.

    If you *really* don't want the life-improving effects of cycling and want power-assist, go get yourself a cheap, used Honda scooter or something.

    Good luck,

    Chris

    1. Re:Buyer Beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true e-bike-phobe. Bicycles are not hard to work on. So now he should buy a scooter that has a gasoline motor that may break down a bit more that's a bit more involved than a bicycle to work on. Go back to you your bike shop and cry some more. Try this one then: http://www.chargerbike.com/

  90. Motivation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There's really no reason not to get a real bike. It's faster, more efficient, better for you, and better for everyone else too. I think I know what the problem is here:

    You can't squeeze your ample posterior into those sleek lycra bike shorts. Here's what you do, my friend.

    Take the shorts and duct-tape them to the refrigerator. Then the next time you go to get beer/soda/ice cream/etc., you'll see them there and think, "If I keep stuffing my face I'll never fit into these sleek lycra shorts." Then go do 20 situps instead.

    You may want to tape another pair of shorts near whereever you keep the chips.

    Finally, a (real) bicycle is one of the greatest gadgets ever created. It is THE most efficient mode of transportation. It has been refined for over a century.

    It requires you to do some work, but it will pay back your input with improved health, better physique, and increased energy.

    Plus, you get to be a bike snob, too. Welcome.

  91. " now, who wants to point me to"ME ME !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SayUncle : 2004 : July ... Sickos |By SayUncle| Two boys aged 10 and 14 are accused of torturing
    five kittens and cutting a dog with box cutters. ...
    www.saysuncle.com/index.php?year=2004& monthnum=07&day=&name=&page=&paged =2 - 101k - Cached - Similar pages

    hosted by Angelfire ... aircraft squadrons had names like Golden Dragons and Satan's Kittens. ... bit by bit,
    until we ran like dogs in 1973 ... the CIA before the war by torturing and killing ...
    www.angelfire.com/nt/dragon9/MILITARY.html - 35k - Oct 2, 2004 - Cached - Similar pages

    THE EVER GROWING COLLECTION OF ASSORTED LINKS AND FUN THINGS THAT ... ... is bringing us a new revolution: Hot dog sculpture. ... bastard clips the head off a
    kitten with its ... she has a really happy birthday today torturing fluffy animals ...
    www.blacktable.com/linkarchive2004a.htm - 55k - Cached - Similar pages

    Daily Rotten: Weird News ... By then the dog had bitten through the girl's arm ... Aid-containing explosive compound
    for homemade fireworks when ... trashing all the rooms before torturing the pet ...
    www.dailyrotten.com/archive/2002/0620.html - 37k - Cached - Similar pages

    Team Murder ... to stay like cell phones, little yippy dogs, and, well ... with the occasional mention
    of the kitten excepted. ... past couple of days and instead torturing myself with ...
    www.teammurder.com/index.php?m=200212 - 101k - Cached - Similar pages

    Bit-O-Humor: Clean Jokes ... there they were, about 20 of 'em torturing this poor ... Candy" "The Little Sissy Who
    Snitched" "Some Kittens Can Fly ... Is That Dog Doing to That Other Dog?" "Why Can ...
    www.octanecreative.com/ mediatower/bitohumor/cljokes2.html - 64k - Oct 2, 2004 - Cached - Similar pages

    Dr. Leroy, the head psychiatrist at the local mental hospital, is ... ... Candy" "The Little Sissy Who Snitched" "Some Kittens Can Fly ... Two hot dogs and a beer
    at a baseball game do ... there they were, about 50 of 'em torturing this chick. ...
    www.geocities.com/Hollywood/ Bungalow/4152/Joke/HUMOR19.TXT - 101k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages

    Porno sex gay porn teens lesbian naked photo girl model boy teen ... ... fuckingdauter teenunderwear mpegs sex torturing los angeles ... sex, animalsfree
    blackwhiteporn anamated kittens excorts in ... lolita free picts animals dogs men boys ...
    www.geocities.com/prosoo2/boy-viedosbears.html - 100k - Supplemental Result - Cached - Similar pages
    [ More results from www.geocities.com ]

    Advice Column ... snarf that is putting the moves on my poor dog! ... blow him away, but the goody goody
    kitten would probably ... online who take a cruel delight in torturing me with ...
    www.cheezey.com/thundercats/inquirer/oldadvic e.htm l - 101k - Cached - Similar pages

    [DOC] HSC YEAR END REPORT
    File Format: Microsoft Word 2000 - View as HTML ... 23 Kitten Trailer, a tiny kitten apparently desperate to leave Edmonton endured
    3 freezing ... 25 Dogs Endured Weeks Of Distress, many of the 171 dogs seized at ...
    www.humanesociety.com/pdfs/YER2003.doc - Similar pages

    [PDF] Quarterly
    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML ... high-heeled or barefoot women torturing defenseless animals

  92. Experiences from an e-bike-owning friend by boutell · · Score: 1

    It comes down to this, in the experience of an e-bike-experienced friend:

    Are there big hills on your route?

    If the hill is big enough, you need a rig that can put out enough power to bring you up that hill. Because the only thing worse than pedaling a nice light road bike up a hill is pedaling a heavy e-bike with an ineffective motor and a heavy-ass lead acid battery up that same hill.

    My friend was fortunate enough to live in Seattle where it was possible to "try before you buy." She wound up with something halfway between an electric motorcycle and a bike. It was a STEEP hill.

    Personally I tend to side with the "just pedal" crowd, unless you're talking about serious hills on days when you have a nasty head cold, etc. I can see wanting a little boost then.

    Lead-acid is a poor choice because of its low energy density. The amount of extra work you do pedaling the bike when you feel like it or have run out of power needs to be less than the amount of work the motor does for you while it's running!

    (No, I'm not saying I have analyzed any of the above variables definitively, but I *am* passing on a real ebike-evaluation story from someone who was ultimately happy with her purchase.)

    --
    Check out the Apostrophe open-source CMS: http://www.apostrophenow.com/
  93. pedantic by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    Professionals go at about 50km/h for short distances (100km). This is on a road bike on flat terrain. But they usually travel in packs

    Even in time trials, riding individually against the clock, professionals can ride faster than that. Average speeds in road races (when riding in a pack) are often only around 40km/h because the pack is not really "racing" a lot of the time; sometimes they are just cruising along, waiting for something to happen or for someone else to do something, particularly early in a race. If the pack is actually racing from the very start, expect the average speed on a flattish, 200km course to be 50km/h+

    You take a mountain bike... friction from tires and that drops you to about 30km/h with no wind.

    You had better hope you always have maximum friction between your tires and the ground no matter what kind of bike you ride, or else your bike will soon be going sideways.

    It is the increased rolling resistance of mountain bike tires, not a difference in friction which will slow you down; imagine rolling an octagon rather than a circle.

  94. Learn to spell you F|_|CK!NG TARD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Peddling != Pedalling.

    Get it?

    1. Re:Learn to spell you F|_|CK!NG TARD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I get it GRAMMAR NAZI! SIEG HEIL!

      Fscking tard. People make mistakes, especially when they've read through a ton of posts making the same mistakes. Only a fscking tard doesn't understand that.

  95. Summary reply from Jakedata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I found four or five really useful suggestions in here. Good links too. Thanks for that.

    Golden Motor may be tough to deal with, but no horror stories.

    Stay away from the Zap! motor (I knew that).

    Lead Acid batteries will be OK for now. NiMH is better, Li Polymer is best, but tempermental.

    The bike will be a thief magnet (I knew that too).

    Where I live, I will probably pick up more chicks with the e-bike than a Harley. They probably won't be as much fun though.

    Check on local licensing regs.

    To the bike snobs - I have an efficient Cannondale road bike, and I ride it often. I wear Lycra shorts. The motor is going on my police auction mountain bike.

    To the "get off your fat ass" trolls - my blood pressure is lower than yours, my cholesterol is lower than yours, I swim laps several times a week, and I know the difference between peddle and pedal.

    My commute is 15 miles with some hellish hills. As several people pointed out, I don't want to stink the place up when I get there.

    And finally, having modpoints while your story is up really r0x0rz.

  96. stunt people? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can usually maintain 35km/h effortlessly, but with this beast 45km/h could be the crusing speed if peddling and motoring can go hand in hand.

    Wouldn't go any faster on a pedal bike, leave that to the stunt people.


    Really?

    What kind of bike are you on? You should be plenty stable up to 40mph (~65km/h). I hit that on almost every ride I go on (I live at the bottom of a few rather large hills, every ride I do ends in a steep decent). Hell 3 weeks ago I was on a 70 mile ride, and I went down a long ~10% grade, I hit 54mph (~87km/h) I didn't feel the least bit unstable until about 50mph, and it was still quite managable the whole way. The pro's in europe routinly break 100km/h coming down mountains.

    And I ride a rather cheap 2002 Giant OCR2 (~$800), I have been told that high speed handling is one of the places where the expensive bikes actually do much better.

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:stunt people? by kinzillah · · Score: 1

      $800 is cheap?

      --
      Douglas P. Price
    2. Re:stunt people? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      for a road bike it is...

      Entry leval is around $500 and a really nice but not extravagant road bike is about $2000-4000

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    3. Re:stunt people? by kinzillah · · Score: 1

      I'm in college. You're talking about my yearly income right there :)

      --
      Douglas P. Price
  97. Don't make one; buy one by Craigory · · Score: 1

    I personally own and use a eGo cycle from eGo Vehicles, a small Rhode Island company.

    I highly recommend them. Start at $1000. Goes 23 mph for about 23 miles per charge. Charges in about 3 hours. Looks great. Quiet. Mine has turn signals, lights, brake lights, electric horn, etc. Climbs hills amazingly well -- they don't even supply peddles because you don't need them. Acceleration is great. Contact me if you're interesting -- I think I can get you ~$50 off the listed prices. (no promises)

    If you want a bicycle for exercise, go for it. But the eGo is an easier, faster (unless you're Mr. Armstrong), and safer way to get to work.

  98. I use a ZAP DX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a ZAP Electricruiser and it's great. I looked at the in-hub motors but there is no way to disconnect them if you run out of power. The ZAP drive works against the tire and can be lifted off the tire if you don't want to use it. The one I have came with a 20AH 12 volt battery which makes it convenient but not good enough. I made an adapter and bought a 35AH battery that works better.
    http://www.zapworld.com/products/dxkit_bike.asp

  99. You need a stinkwheel by GuyFawkes · · Score: 1

    http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~pattle/nacc/arc0 531.htm

    --
    http://slashdot.org/~GuyFawkes/journal
  100. What color is the Bike Shed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's pretty much all I want to know.

  101. Li-Ion by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    The li-ion are great batteries but are rated for 500 cycles. Unless the reality is significantly different it seems like you'd be replacing them more often than SLA.

    I haven't tried them in working project yet but there are a couple electric car projects that used them with success. Lot of output.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Li-Ion by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      You can increase the cycle life of Li-ion batteries by making sure they don't overheat. If you put them in a cooling jacket which keeps the temperature well below 50C you can double or more the cycle life.

      --
      Deleted
  102. Bicycle as vehicle by crush · · Score: 1

    What was wrong with the Bay Area commute experience? Sounds like it was good to me!

    One important thing worth mentioning to anyone that's considering cycling with or without an assisting motor is to learn how to operate the vehicle correctly. And I mean really learn! There are skills and behavior appropriate to bicycling that many people that drive (and unfortunately a sizeable number that cycle occasionally) seem to have no idea about.

    The main point to remember is that the bicycle is considered a vehicle with some variant abilities and should be ridden as such. The clearest exponent of this is John Forester (a road-traffic engineer who spent years collecting empiricial data on how experienced club-cyclists ride), who codified his work into a tome called "Effective Cycling". There's a short, amusing and mostly accurate quiz to take here which encapsulates many of these ideas.

    Many people's disinclination to cycle is based upon fear due to their lack of understanding of how to ride with traffic.

    1. Re:Bicycle as vehicle by angio · · Score: 1

      > What was wrong with the Bay Area commute experience?

      It wasn't the daily commute that was wrong - it was the rest of it. :) The big bike lane on the expressway (and the commuters who actually watched for bikes in it) was a very pleasant surprise. Sunnyvale, though, was an unexciting place to live, and without a car, it was difficult to do things other than get up, go to work, and get home (and go for a long ride through the mountains on weekends -- very nice). The caltrain stops running early enough that trips to San Francisco were a pain. I biked up there once, and only once - the roads were pretty nasty. It's not a very pedestrian-friendly place for the times when you don't want to have to haul your bike & lock around with you. Even getting to safeway took about 15 minutes.

      The commute part was just fine. It was mostly the rest of living there without a car that I didn't like. In contrast, living in Boston without a car is great. Car ownership here just induces stress (has it been dinged yet today? stolen? ticketed?). For places within 20 miles of the city, I can usually get there just as fast on bike as you can via car.

    2. Re:Bicycle as vehicle by crush · · Score: 1

      Ah. I've never visited Sunnyvale, but I suspect that I understand what you're talking about having seen places like the San Gabriel Valley in Los Angeles: sort of urban wastelands.

      I feel that high-density urban areas or quiet countryside are the natural habitat of the cyclist. I've lived in Boston, Toronto, Los Angeles and London and always enjoyed cycling. The only times I've not liked it has been in places like the SGV or Orange County which seem to have been designed to make life unpleasant if you're not in a car!

  103. Re:what is your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is your point? Arriving to work sweaty?

    1. Not everyone lives in US SouthEast. So hot mornings are not a problem for everyone

    2. Besides, a lot of larger companies have showers, if that's what you meant

    3. And yes, you can wash yourself even w/o showers

  104. I own a Currie electric bike by tafinucane · · Score: 1

    My bike has a 24 volt power supply. The motor is mounted on the back wheel with its dedicated chain and gear, on the opposite side of the deraileur. The bike is a standard cheap heavy duty mountain bike with front suspension. Currie sells just the kits for around $400 and the complete bikes for around $800. My county offered a generous rebate for electric bikes, without which I would not have bought this one. I used to live about 13 miles from work. The electric bike was good for beating rush hour. It is heavy as fuck. It starts out on a heavy mountain bike, then add 10 pounds for the motor and 40 pounds for the lead acid battery. It is too slow; to be legally ridable in California without a motorcycle license it must be geared for a top speed of 20 mph. I wish I had bought a 36 volt system so I could swap out the drive gear for a little more speed. Now I live about 25 miles from work, which is beyond the battery capacity of my style of riding (full throttle on the motor, pedalling as hard as I can--plus the battery is 3 years old and doesn't hold its full charge anymore). I will occasionally drive the bike in my car to a parking lot halfway to work, and ride the remainder. This is where heavy as fuck, and the small motor jutting out on one side hurt me. I still arrive at work sweaty and disheveled. Only the sweaty part is unusual, though--and nobody cares if geeks are sweaty in my office. The difference is I am not exausted from riding a standard bike as fast as I can for 13 miles. I am rarely passed by another bicyclist or e-bicyclist. I am definitely faster than traffic at rush hour. Your in-hub 36 volt bike looks promising. Expect it to be heavy as fuck. Don't expect to find an alternative to lead-acid any time soon, unless you're prepared to fork over serious dough. Expect to find a million standard bicyclists bitching about how you should buy a road bike and have your work install a shower for every person with practical advice about e-bikes.

  105. e-Bike information by dhowe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is a "best of breed" you can dream about. http://www.tidalforce.com/

    Check out the Yahoo discussion groups. Also, importing a "one-of" from China has proven very difficult. You might be better off getting one of the zapbikes kits.

  106. Only if you suck at cardio by TamMan2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you burn more than you eat you will lose weight.

    I burned ~6000 Calories this weekend running and biking. You gonna tell me that doing that all the time is not going to make me lose weight?

    Also you left something out of your equation, the number of calories/lean pound/day you burn can be increased by doing cardio. Doing both cardio and weight training is the best way to lose weight. I lift for 1.5 hours twice a week, bike 1-2 times a week for 2-6 hours, and run 3-5 times a week for 1-3 hours. I am losing weight on a 5000 calorie a day diet, mostly comprised of complex carbs. You think I could lose wieght eating that much on just lifting 3 hours a week?

    Cardio is good for working your heart but it won't make you lose weight.

    The stupidity of this statment is obvious to anyone who has ever attended a post race party. Most runners are freakishly skinny, and eat like horses.

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:Only if you suck at cardio by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      if I could go back and edit and my post, I would because I was bit quick to type and submit.

      Hell I personally owe weight loss to running.

      I was targetting people that do very little running compared to you (which includes me these days).

      But I know a lot of people that only run 10-20 minutes per day or less and expect to lose weight that way. It's good for their heart, and it'll bump up their metabolism a bit, but the amount of calories they burn during that small run isn't enough to work off a snickers bar or their morning cup of coffee.

      The hours you dedicate to working out (which is a little bit more than me) is a lot more than other people dedicate to it because they all expect the equivalent of a get rich quick scheme. Because of the hours you dedicate to cardio you burn a very large amount of calories and in turn maintain a high calorie diet. That rocks, and I support it wholeheartedly. Lord knows your aerobic and endurance capabilities are probably 10 times that of mine right now.

      So I apologize for my incorrect blanket statement.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    2. Re:Only if you suck at cardio by drew · · Score: 2, Informative

      counting the calories you burn in any given physical activity is not going to help you determine how much weight you will lose. given your example, (~6000 calories) you will lose about 1.7 pounds from that weekend if you eat nothing at all during that same time period (~3500 calories burned == 1 pound weight loss). not really a healthy way to lose weight.

      counting calories that you consume can be helpful in maintaining a consistent diet, but counting the calories burned during any given physical activity is mostly meaningless. the parent poster is correct in pointing out that most of the calories that you burn are burned at rest. however, he missed the point. while the 6000 calories that you burned working out this weekend are not going to make you lose much weight (considering you state you take in about 10,000 calories during that same time period), doing that on a consistent basis will increase the amount of calories your body burns at rest.

      by simple calorie counting math, i would lose just as much weight eating 2000 calories a day and not working out as i would eating 5000 calories a day and going on a three hour run or bike ride every day. in reality, this is not true- the person eating 5000 calories and going on a bike ride that burns 3000 calories every day will lose substantially more weight than a person who eats 2000 calories and sits on the couch watching tv or playing playstation every night, because his metabolism is substantially higher. this is the simple fact that many calorie counters miss out on. it's not hard to keep track of every calorie you take into your body, but it's almost impossible to accurately keep track of how many calories your body burns throughout an entire day.

      you are certainly right about calling out the parent poster on cardio workouts. working your heart is the best way to increase your metabolism, if you do it on a regular basis. the key is that since they dont burn as many calories during the workout as more high impact workouts, you won't see much results if you don't do them consistently. runners are freakishly skinny because most people who run competitively run about 3-5 miles a day. for people who only want to be bothered to work out once or twice a week, you will probably get better results (at least initially) from 2 hours weight lifting a week than from 2 hours of running or bicycling. for people who are willing to work out at least a half an hour 4 days a week or more, the bicycling or running will produce far better results.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  107. Re:I'm a cyclist and I think it's not such a bad i by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

    I keep a towel under my desk @ work. (do you know where your towel is?) And shower EVERY day. But a good strong deoderant helps. BTW: Anti-persperant makes it worse; since if you apply it before the ride you'll just sweat elsewhere.

    In all honestly, I've never had a complaint from coworkers. But a shower (& Gym) at work would be awsome beyond compare.

    Now here's a discussion I never thought I'd have at slashdot.

  108. obligatory Simpsons reference by patjenk · · Score: 1

    I get to work on a go-kart powered by my own sense of self satisfaction.

  109. Real bike is probably less hassle than e-bike by bitingduck · · Score: 1

    I've been bike commuting for about 14 years now (yikes!) in three different cities, and the e-bike just seems like more hassle than a real bike. I see people using things like that to commute from the parking lot to their office, but it seems like more hassle than it's worth.

    advantages of the e-bike:
    - extra boost when you're tired
    - slight improvement in cruising speed (at least until you get in shape)
    - high geek-factor

    disadvantages:
    - more parts to maintain
    - heavy batteries (even light batteries weigh more than none) that you have to haul around with your legs when you get too far from home and the juice runs out.
    - if it drives the tire rather than the hub you'll go through tires a lot faster

    I actually looked at electric vs. gasoline cars when I replaced my car several years ago. I decided that the electric car couldn't do anything for me that a regular bike didn't already do (shorter range, similar carrying capacity, it doesn't rain here so that doesn't matter). Hybrids made more sense, but for a reasonable fraction of my driving (hauling bikes up mountain roads) were way underpowered.

    These days I actually find it much more hassle to drive a car to work (about 5 miles each way, total elevation gain on the asymmetric round trip about 900-1000 ft) than to pedal. I rode about 8 miles each way, with less elevation change, for about 5 years.

    Whether you smell at work or not depends on a lot of variables. If it's dry out and your sweat evaporates fast, you generally won't smell bad if you shower before you leave home. If it's humid, a shower or even quick wash in the sink combined with anti-perspirant can keep you smelling fresh as springtime. And changing clothes is generally a good idea either way.

    1. Re:Real bike is probably less hassle than e-bike by Rheingold · · Score: 1

      There's another likely disadvantage: The damn things are expensive and that probably makes them prime targets for theft.

      --
      Wil
      wiki
    2. Re:Real bike is probably less hassle than e-bike by mink · · Score: 1

      "Hybrids made more sense, but for a reasonable fraction of my driving (hauling bikes up mountain roads) were way underpowered."

      Why do you say this? I drive a Prius and drove from Columbus Ohio to some place in Western North Carolina (via Ohio->W.VA.->Kentucky->Corth Carolina and reverse) and had no problem doing 70+ on the steep hills/mountins. I have also driven up shorter much steeper grades, and frankly Htybrids have a lot more umph then anything else I have driven on that kind of hill.

      I do think my little Prius is a bit bad for old back roads that are mostly mud, and if thats what you were talking about I do understand.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    3. Re:Real bike is probably less hassle than e-bike by bitingduck · · Score: 1

      The Prius had just come out at the time, and there weren't a lot of people with experience with it. The car I was driving was about 100 HP (though kind of heavy) and had a hard time on some of the roads around here (Southern CA) when loaded with bikes and gear. For short steep stuff it was clear that the hybrids would be fine, because the batteries give them instant power, but there are plenty of places around here where you're driving up a steep grade (paved) for 45 minutes or more.

      I ended up with a Saturn wagon (the little one, not the LW) with a 125 HP engine. It does fine, though it was pretty much at its limit on some of the hills when we had 3 people+3 bikes (on top) +gear driving out to New Mexico. You could maintain speed, but if you had to slow down it would take forever to speed back up.

      It's probably a bit better if you put the bikes on the back, but most rear racks can be pretty hard on bikes (they bang together), and they're not as good for leaving on all the time if you carry bikes a lot.

      Next time I get a new car (probably 10 years or so) I'll probably end up with a hybrid.

    4. Re:Real bike is probably less hassle than e-bike by mink · · Score: 1

      The reason I cited my 8 hour trip was that for a good while I was climbing mountains (and going down them). I was able to maintain 70 MPH and keep my MPG to 45 average (I have a "classic" Prius) not the new 2004 model.

      I dont know about the Civics and Insights but with a Prius at least there should be no problem with what you describe for hill travel. There are a few sites that can do far better explaining the tech then I can. If you like I could give some links.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  110. Re: pedal power is more reliable by johnrpenner · · Score: 1


    i've rode a regular bicycle to and from work for four years now,
    and its incredibly reliable -- i live in toronto where there's snow and
    slush for three months of the year, and i just can't see how one of
    these eBikes would make it through similair conditions.

    there's ice and snow and slush, and you just got to be able to go through it
    as a matter of course -- with the bicycle, its never been a problem.
    also, you don't have to go looking places to charge the thing. just put
    some oil on the chain to keep it from rusting through the winter,
    dress warm, and you're all set.

    also when its cold -- if you're pedaling your own bike, you're making your
    own warmth, and you end up feeling warmer than on something that is
    providing the power for you.

    the exercise of pedaling a bike keeps you warmer, more fit, and is
    an order of magnitude more reliable than a complicated electrical assembly.

    for RELIABLE transport to work, an ebike makes a nice toy for the fair weather,
    but it just can't match the reliability and low cost of a real bike.

    2cents
    j

  111. e-bike? feh. Ride 'bent or ride in pain! by alhaz · · Score: 1


    electric bikes don't make much, if any sense. You add a bunch of weight for a little added torque.

    Take your money and buy a recumbent - get a more efficient drive train and a more comfortable seat and a better view. Plus people will shout out "Cool!" instead of muttering "Man, what a sissy, can't even pedal for himself!"

    If you're cheap you can get a Cycle Genius CGX or a Sun EZ-1 or one of the China Mascot imports (google for 'actionbent' or 'tsunami t-2') for about $500-600.

    On a wedgie the maximum force you can apply to the pedals is roughly what gravity can give you. On a 'bent you're pushing between the seat and the pedals. All the bicycle speed records were set with recumbents.

    I started riding a short wheel base recumbent about a week ago, and I'm never going back to a wedgie. Haven't mounted my cyclocomputer yet, so I dunno what to say about my average speed.

    --
    This is just like television, only you can see much further.
  112. Regarding battery dumping by ngkdc · · Score: 1

    I think you'll find the number of lead acid batteries making it to the landfill (in the US, at least) to be less than 5%; last time I checked the recycling rate was over 95%.

    Now a word about lead-acid battery recycling ... first thing that happens is the acid/water electrolyte is removed. The acid is neutralized with Caustic Soda. The resulting salt, Sodium Sulfate, is sold as a food-grade preservative. That's right ... food grade (there are other purification processes involved).

    The battery cases are plastic (polypropylene, pvc, or polycarbonate). The plastic is removed from the mix and is reground and used to make more battery cases.

    The lead, lead oxide, lead sulfate, and any other lead compounds are melted in the smelter furnace. The alloy mixture is corrected (removing unwanted impurities) and the lead is cast into pigs (bar shape) and hogs (about 1 ton block). This lead is then resold ... and most of it heads right back to the battery manufacturing cycle.

    ***

    Besides the common sense values of not landfilling a used battery, there are economic and legal speed bumps toward unwanton dumping. The economic model is where you're required to return your old battery and receive a refund on your "core charge", usually $5-10 USD. With the typical auto SLI battery costing $35-45 USD, this is a pretty good incentive. There's also the legal requirement that the USEPA has mandated ... you can't landfill lead acid batteries. Most trash haulers keep a very close eye on what they put into their bins and trucks (believe me, if you lift a trash can with a battery in it, you'll know pretty quick. I have to add that it's not fool-proof (fools, after all, are known to be very creative in their foolishness), but based on the battery weight returned to smelters every year, it's pretty close.

  113. Actual helpful information by HarryLeBlanc · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you're sick of the "why don't you just bike, fattie?" responses, so for a change of pace I thought I'd give you some useful info.
    I've been researching electric bikes myself, as I live in Oakland -- and yes, I'm a fattie too. I can manage the flat bits pretty well, but the hills out here are killer.
    One really useful page with lots of links to various manufacturers and honest opinions by actual users is http://electric-bikes.com/others-b.htm#Elebike%20H ub%20Motor%20Kit -- some of the links are broken, but mostly it's got good info. A good FAQ is here: http://www.peltzer.net/ebike/PA_FAQ.htm
    As I have a recumbent, a front-wheel system won't work for me. And as I have a drum brake, I need a friction drive. I ended up deciding on Palmer Industries (http://www.palmerind.com/pwrkit.htm). Their product line kinda resembles the Zap system, only they have more mounting options. Plus they're small and friendly. I talked for about a half hour with the engineer, who I think is the husband of the saleswoman -- it feels like a real "mom & pop" organization. They also have several bikes and trikes available.
    As for being sweaty, I agree that you should bring a change of clothes, and I find that baby-wipes are great for a quick cleanup when there's no shower available.
    Ignore the nimrods who just want to tear you down. It's great that you're looking into the e-bike thing. You don't have to be a triathlete, and doing some of the peddling will definitely help you get in shape, and the motor will help you with the bits that push your limits. An e-bike is far more ecofriendly than a car, and maybe a good stepping stone to "pure" biking. Or maybe not, and that's fine too.

  114. I wouldn't by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
    I commute regularly by bike, and I've ridden a couple of commercial elec bikes. The $1000 Giant LaFree, and some $500 thing from Huffy.

    My take? The motor+batteries+drivetrain provides enough power to overcome the extra weight of the motor+batteries+drivetrain. And when/if you're out and about, with a low battery....you have a 75lb bike to try to pedal around.

    If you live in an apartment, you're in trouble. You can toos a regular bike over your shoulder no problem. A 75lb eBike is something else.

    Be sure to beef up the kickstand, and watch the CoG. The Huffy model I tried would not stay upright on the stock kickstand (too much weight in the back).

    eBikes aren't bicycles anymore, they're baby motorcycles/mopeds.

  115. Electric Bikes Northwest by Koatdus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    http://www.electricvehiclesnw.com/

    Electic Bikes Northwest has some good information as well as a movie of one of the bikes climbing a serious hill. They seem to favor the kind of e-bikes that are activated by peddling. Something about the drive being about to provide power through the gears as opposed to a fixed gear ratio.

    --
    Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
  116. The hub motor is the limiting factor by tecfhweenie · · Score: 3, Interesting
    No hub motor-powered e-bike is going to operate as a pedal bike. The unsprung weight, lack of gearing, and the fact you're fighting the inertia of the motor detracts from the experience.

    At ZVO, we tackled that series of problems and created an e-bike that's light (39 lb.), easy to pedal and uses whatever gearing is currently on the bike -- from derailleurs to hub transmissions. As a result, we have a bike that will do over 35 MPH and climb hills, as well, without pedaling, but encourages dual drive modality -- pedal with motor assist -- for the most daunting hills while you're training.

    http://www.zvoinc.com/

    We don't think powering a bike is sacrilegeous. Anything that gets more people out among other folks and encourages a sense of community is a good thing. Anything that relieves road congestion is a good thing. Anything that encourages excercising more than the right foot is a good thing.

    1. Re:The hub motor is the limiting factor by f_head · · Score: 1

      I've test driven ZVO's Burro bike (I think that's the name of the model). The electric ride is very cool, nice acceleration etc. What surprised me was how "real bike"-like the pedaling was. I didn't try it but it seemed to me that you could pedal the bike very comfortably should you run out of juice. It was, to paraphrase Steve Jobs, insanely cool thing to ride...

  117. Shite roads by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    and a better riding position, fatter tyres soak up more of the bumps than skinny high pressure road tyres.

    I rarely go offroad, but I bought a cheap aluminium mountain bike because of the riding position, lighter weight than a commuter style bike, and lower gearing. If I do occasionally want to take it offroad I can. I do agree about the shocks but I couldn't get an aluminium framed bike at the same price without the shocks.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Shite roads by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Yeah ironic, isn't it?

      These days it is cheaper to get "shocks" than getting a bike that has a normal fork.

      As for the lower gearing... I already think my commuter is geared too low, I am pretty much in the big gear all the time.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  118. Self-propulsion is good for you by akepa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been biking about an hour a day during my lunch break for the last few months. I've managed to lose over 20 pounds as a result - even on a steady diet of pizza, steak & cheese subs, and Mountain Dew. I feel better, look better (according to my wife), and have more energy than before I started biking. Get an e-bike if you must, but do yourself a favor and ride under your own power as much as possible.

  119. Found it! by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

    I love google.

    This is ALMOST exactly what I'm looking for. Too bad he isn't selling yet.
    http://revopower.com/main.php

    However these guys ARE selling. It requires perminant mod's to the bike, so you'd have to get a second one, if you didn't want to always shlep the extra weight. The Eagle in particular looks exclenent (if expensive) since it is designed to allow you to pedal along with it. I'm not sure about the other types.

    http://www.bikeengines.com/info.htm
    http://www. grubeeinc.com/grubeeinc%20product%20lin e.htm
    http://search.ebay.com/Motorized-Bicycle_W0 QQsofoc usZbsQQsbrftogZ1QQfromZR10QQsotrZ2QQcoactionZcompa reQQcopagenumZ1QQcoentrypageZsearch

    The only thing that could make these designes better is if you could quickly detatch the motors when not needed. something I've not seen in any "assist" design. And with a 250mi to a gallon range (105.7 kilometers per Liter) it's not so un-green after all. You can get extended tanks, which is a good idea since they all require mixed fuels.

    1. Re:Found it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chargerbike has almost everything you need. http://www.chargerbike.com/ The battery pack comes off easily. Once the battery and controller pack's off, if feels like a regular mountainbike. After riding it for a year, I found that it only saves me 3 minutes on my way to work, but I'm definitely sweating less during a 10 minute ride instead of a 13 minute ride uphill. Coming home, I don't get much benefit since I'm going downhill. It may save me 30 seconds off my 7 minute ride when I make my full and complete stops at the stop signs and red lights.

  120. Side-view mirrors by revividus · · Score: 1
    My closest call was riding home from work in Tulsa. A lot of Tulsa streets have virtually no shoulder at all, but 61st, west of Mingo (aren't Tulsa street names great?) has about a foot of shoulder. It was dark, I had a headlight but no tail-light at all (which is bad, I know).

    It's a long straight road, so some guy in a sporty little thing was speeding right by me and didn't even notice me. His side-view mirror slapped the back of my calf (it was a pretty low car, and my left leg must have been near the top of a pedal arc or something), but I was more shocked than hurt -- I got wobbly for a minute, but never quite fell over.

    He realized after the fact that he hit something, so he stopped, and was apologizing up a storm. I think he was afraid I'd try to sue him, but I just told him to forget about it.

    And then I bought a tail-light the next day. :-)

  121. Re: visibility by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

    I wear a blaze-orange vest and a white helmet with five blinking super-bright red LED's on the back. Doesn't prevent the occasional caddy-driver from locking up their brakes behind me when they suddenly "notice" that the thing in front of their car is suddenly getting closer.

    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  122. I built an E-Bike once - real cheap too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used two EV Warrior surplus motors at 24 volts and managed to go about 30 km/h. The shafts both connected to a friction roller with a one way clutch built in. The idea was that you could still peddal the bike without driving the motors.

    I mounted the motors to an unused set of brake mounts (my bike has two, presumable to support different types of brakes). I used rope and turnbuckles to get some tension between the roller and the wheel.

    What I discovered is friction drives aren't that great. I peeled more rubber off the wheel onto the roller than anything else. Even though it had a one way clutch it was still difficult to peddal. I also didn't have a controller which meant full power when you turned it on. This worked well when you're already going 20 km/h, but from a dead stop was a little rough.

    The bike is a lot heavier with the batteries. But it was still a fun project.

  123. E*bike research comparison notes? by Ironic77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have also been looking for awhile. I'd like to compare notes with what you have found privately to aid both of us in a decision w/o all the flames and tangents. -K

    1. Re:E*bike research comparison notes? by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

      I'd like to get in on that email thread...

      The only flame I have to add is that all the commercial electrics that I've seen were of the wedgie variety and anybody with any cycling sense (or concern for efficiency:-) has already gotten 'bent. I would recommend that you get 'bent too. There are many sites that extol the virtues of the venerable recumbent, too numerous to link to here. But suffice it to say that I rode and commuted (to the tune of 175mi per week) on a wedgie for many a year. The show stopper wasn't the neck and back pain, it wasn't the pressure on the glutes, it wasn't even the numbness in my hands - it was the friction in the squishy bit area.

      I've decided that the DX kit (which I don't think is available anymore) followed closely by the SX kit from ZAP (http://www.zapworld.com/) are probably the quickest, easiest way to convert my 'bent (http://www.lightningbikes.com/) to an eBent (or yer wedgie for that matter - both kits were designed for wedgies:-). Both of these kits drive the wheel through a friction roller right on the tire. They were designed to drive the rear wheel, ZAP offers a kit to drive the front wheel too, but it doesn't have the beefy power output of the SX & DX kits

      Then when I started looking at yer golden monkey stuff I got to thinking about the relative rpms of my differently sized wheel... I'm wondering how much juice I could generate outta my 16" front wheel - but I ain't bright enough to do that kinda math. Maybe I could get you engineer types to give me a hand?

  124. E bike not a quality bike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sorry, but I would say that from working nearly 10 years the bike industry that the E Bike is junk. Just a step up from the bikes at Wal Marts.

    Don't get suckered into their marketing, these bikes are a waste of money.

    Buy a bike from a Bike shop. Shop around and find a shop that cares. If you buy a bike from a shop, you know its built right. IF you have never built a bike before, then don't try now, I doubt you can do it with out hands on instruction.

    Also if you buy a bike from a shop you should have a service plan that lasts a year and includes a free tune up.

    DONT BUY THE E BIKE!

  125. Commute route == choice of mount by hey! · · Score: 1

    Depends on your commute. I have both a mountain bike and a road bike, and have used both for commuting depending on the distance and road conditions.

    Mountain bike tires deal much better with road debris, sand, gravel, unavoidable potholes, and have a much lower rate of flats than road bike tires. I like slicks for MTB commuting, which I have mounted on different, lighter wheels I custom built for commuting. When I want to go offroad, I swap wheels. I also have bars that give me a choice of an upright or more horizontal body position. I switch quite a bit between them on a commute depending on whether I have a clear stetch or not; I prefer a more upright position in heavy traffic due to better visibility and vision.

    On the other hand, not only is a road bike much faster, I find a road bike much more comfortable over long distances (I think most experienced cyclists would). High quality tires and inner tubes make a huge difference to durability and ride as well. I'm a big fan of latex inner tubes, although you have to inflate them daily, the greater comfort, speed and lower puncture rate is well worth the effort. Going to latex and a tire with high tpi casing reduced my flat rate dramatically.

    Overall, for short hop city commuting, with heavy traffic and poor roads, an ATB is a bit better in my experience. For commutes over good roads and with distnces of ten or so miles, I'd tend to road. Over fifteen miles I'd definitely go road bike no matter what. Personally, if I were living out in the country I'd be a lot more likely to use a road bike. If I were living in the city, I'd be much more likel to go ATB.

    Unfortunately, this is all academic for me these days because my commute is 50 miles each way ;-(

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Commute route == choice of mount by budgenator · · Score: 1

      But don't you just love the rifle-like crack a piece of pea gravel makes as it's ejected from the side of a 105 psi racing slick and hits the expensive paint on some assholes car who thinks he's to good to share the road with a meer bicycle?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:Commute route == choice of mount by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      Well you could check out the MTB tires that arent knobby in the middle. They are designed more for hardpack (textured on the usual riding surface, knobbs on the edges for turning) but work wonders if you are on the road.

      --
      Bottles.
  126. Why Not Just Peddle?? by liquidzero4 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I get the point of this. Why not just get yourself in good physical condition and just peddle the bike to and from work???

    1. Re:Why Not Just Peddle?? by ShinGouki · · Score: 1

      so you don't arrive a sweaty gross mess

      --
      -dk
      Dream with the feathers of angels stuffed beneath your head.
  127. road vs. mtb by bodrell · · Score: 1
    I'm not too keen on the road bike geometry. And where I live, there is no street maintained well enough to protect those thin road bike tires. I just got my first road bike, and where the ground is smooth it's awesome, but I'm sure I'll wipe out one of these days when my front wheel gets caught in a huge crack in the asphalt on the bike trail.

    My favorite city bike is a mountain bike with rigid forks and fairly skinny tires (maybe twice the diameter of the average road tire). My tires are mostly slick and the hubs have low rolling resistance. Even though I have no shocks, it's very nice to hop a curb without damaging your wheelset. That's not even considering deep potholes that can ruin a road bike.

    Mountain bikes are easier to maneuver, too, because of their smaller wheels. And although I did get a road bike, I got straight handle bars on it because drop bars suck, honestly. I think the drop bars are the number one reason people here in the US avoid road bikes.

    On a semi-related subject, I've been thinking about converting an old Trek hybrid into a fixed-gear for commuting. Anyone have experiences to share with their fixed-gear bikes?

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
  128. Ethenol fuel cells? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Has there been much research into ethenol fuel cells? Ethenol seems like it would be easer to produce then methenol, with all the corn out there, and it has so many other uses... :)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  129. Re:I'm a cyclist and I think it's not such a bad i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Small gas engines are horrible for the planet, you are better off driving a car. E-bikes are heavy and slow making them a danger on the road. f*cking moped...

  130. bikes do not need to be high-tech by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    if you have too much $ and need some way to get rid of it, or if you're looking for an inventive manner to create some future (potentially toxic) landfill ... then this is a idea.

    bikes do not need to be high tech. use your muscles. kill two birds ... get some exercise, commute to work, reduce vehicle costs, cut down on traffic, reduce global warming ... all at the same time!

  131. FUD. by b1scuit · · Score: 1

    It's not just for software anymore.

  132. aero of the rider by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    Nah, aerodynamics of the bike has little to do with performance. But then, maybe you mean of "bike + rider". That really does help a bit. The rider can produce a large amound of areo drag at airspeeds > 14mph or so.

    One of the most important factors determining how aerodynamic a bike/rider combo is, is the position of the rider on the bike, which is largly determined by the bike.

    When someone talks about a bike being aerodynamic, they mean that the rider is in a very forward leaning position when riding...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  133. e-bike considerations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'a few times a week, weather permitting'

    consider if regenerative braking is beneficial to your commute. flat, steady speed, probably not. hills, lots of stop and go, probably is. also, longer distance commute with start/stop and hills can benefit from reduced weight afforded by energy recovery through regenerative braking.

    consider this is an experiment to see if you will
    like e-bike. for that, you may not want the extra expense of exotic batteries. if it's a fairly short commute, the inexpensive motor and lead acid batteies will get you started and you can upgrade later. for lead acid batteries, choose something that is designed for deep discharge and you can size them to your commute. golf cart batteries may be a good option.

    consider speed desired and efficiency (electrical to mechanical) in sizing your motor. there should be a good bit of data on human power output levels on www that you can scale according to the parameters of your machine/passenger. the spreadsheet is your friend here (open office)

    don't forget to consider accessories and amenities
    lights, big sub woofers, ogg-voorbis music player, flame thrower

    maybe a classic moped or scooter would be a better choice. 100+ mpg, impress the non-vegan chicks who bath regularly

    see http://www.mopedarmy.com for starters and banch out from there. for new moped you can get a nice chinese made with clone of honda motor that looks like a classic honda scooter for under $1000 in both 50cc or 90cc version

    safer than a bicycle too if you're riding on the road.

    if you go with a bicycle, PLEASE BUY AND USE A BELL. I walk to work and have developed a strong urge to shred cyclists who swoosh by my shoulder without sounding a bell first. 'on your left' is great until you have a run in with the cyclist who doesn't know right from left (estimate 20%+ of them)

    1. Re:e-bike considerations by danlyke · · Score: 1

      I stopped calling "on your left" because too many pedestrians took that as "look over your left shoulder" which generally meant they took a step to their left.

      Eventually I stopped warning them: much better I should have a slightly frightened but unhit pedestrian than one who stepped into my path.

  134. fatty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just need to pedal your fat ass where you go....lazy bum.

  135. Another point of view by cachorro · · Score: 1

    Actually, an e-bike can make alot of sense in the right circumstances. I would consider biking to work, except having survived several heart attacks at age 50, it is not prudent for me to push any cardio exercise too far. It doesn't help that my dad dropped dead on an exercise bike at age 58.

    Still, I'd like to do my part for the environment and get a safe amount of exercise in the bargain, but the 500 foot hill between me and work is a real obstacle. This e-bike thingy could be just the thing for me.

    Sadly, while I'd like to hear a real discussion of the pros and cons of the available technologies, I instead have to wade through post-after-post made by arrogant idiots who cannot imagine that there might actually be people out here that could derive some benefits from e-bikes.

    Life is bigger than you, and you are not me...

  136. Learn to use real words dumbass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tard is not a word.

    Get it?

  137. Re:I'm a cyclist and I think it's not such a bad i by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

    Read my lips you anonymous green twit:

    250mi per gallon!

    Electric don't come from nowhere, it has to be generated. And since we shut down all the nuclear powerplants because of reactionist nutballs, and hammer toting physisits (who didn't listen to Teller), we generate most of that from coal and natural gass. Neither of which is great for the environment either.

    (then again if we listened to Teller we'd be using A-Bombs to clear mountain ranges... they can't all be gems)

    The name of the game isn't perpetual motion machines, and fancies about renewable energies that are still 50 years off (and even then wofully inadequate). It's about efficiency. And at 250mpg I'm not too worried about the environmental impact.

    If your still worried about renewables and CO2 (and cowfarting etc.) there are plenty of synthetic methods of power such engines, such as biomass fules. It couldn't be too hard to swap out some of these motors for diesel biofule motors. Since most of these motors already require mixed fules, you might as well go the rest of the way an make your own fule.

  138. My e-bike project... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    Check it out at my website, though I haven't done much on it in a while (maybe more will get done this winter). Basically, I took two bike frames (a women's 26" and a girl's 20"), cut them apart, and rewelded them into a recumbent frame. I plan on using a 90VDC motor likely running 12 or 24 VDC, coupled to the rear wheel via the chain. For the first run, it will be a direct switched system - maybe later I will add a controller. So far, it has been a fun "off-and-on" again project. Nothing too difficult to do - though I wonder how well it will work in the end. Something else to consider: I plan on using Amerityre's bicycle road-tread tires to cut down on friction, etc...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  139. Some helpful ebike info by Swordman · · Score: 1

    I built an ebike about three years ago. These links were very helpful to me to get ideas:

    http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/ - photo album of electric car, bike, etc. designs.
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/power-assi st/ - yahoo group for motor assisted bicycles.

    I used a mountain bike, EV warrior motors (dual dc motors with friction drive with the back wheel), a pulse modulated speed control, and deep cycle AGM batteries. The original design is on this page.

    http://webpages.charter.net/schiavoneaj/ebike/

    I have made a few modifications to the design: 1) I moved the motors further back because they got too hot being so close to my legs, 2) I moved the batteries to each side of the back tire because it was too top heavy, and I made a better speed controller housing.

    I can get around 16 mph and a range of 8 - 10 miles with two 12V 17 amp hour batteries (total of 24 V driving the motors).

    And contrary to all the fat ass comments, it was fun to build, is fun to ride, and I do get exercise because I pedal in addition to using the motor.

  140. dont be a puss use ur legs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slower but healthier

  141. shocks that _restore_ power... by hooqqa · · Score: 0

    Why no shocks that use the resistance from a copper/magnet drag to recharge?

  142. Do not drink methanol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> ... if you drink it, it will pickle your liver.

    Not only that, if you're lucky, you'll get blind.

    More frequently, though, you die quickly (I mean in a matter of hours, after going into a coma). Such symptoms are already quite known, I am not making this up.

    Do not toy with this thing.

  143. cheap motor == get what you pay for by Willard+B.+Trophy · · Score: 1
    My local bike shop used to be Ben Cooper's Kinetics near Glasgow. They sell a lot of electric-assist bicycles, mostly with Heinzmann motors.

    For a while they stocked cheaper units, but started getting them back really quickly. Ben showed me the drive gears from these Chinese motors; they were soft metal, and had worn out in a couple of hundred miles.

    Heinzmann make a range of motors, from low power, long range to high performance short duration units. Check which of these (if any) are road legal in your area.

  144. Use bike trails or ride during off-peak hours... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    ...or get out of the way.

    Seriously, riding a bike on roadways is dangerous - you are going slower than the flow of traffic and possibly illegally so. You're annoying the other drivers - drivers who have PAID for the roads with fuel taxes. Yes, people who buy fuel really do have more of a right to use the roads.

    While you probably don't care, you'll eventually encounter some asshole who does something careless to pass you and ends up getting you seriously injured. Put yourself in the position of the driver - when you're making car payments, buying fuel, and to top it off you're already late from traffic, ending up behind someone on a bicycle can be a very frustrating situation. Some people actually have deadlines and don't have the luxury of taking their time getting to their destination at a leasurely pace.

    I'm not trying to flame, I'm just saying that you DO have a right to use the road like any other public utility provided you contribute your fair share (taxes) and don't disrupt the normal flow of traffic. No one likes someone who pisses in the pool.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  145. Re:work those pounds off! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you say you've lost weight?

  146. Re:Use bike trails or ride during off-peak hours.. by MKalus · · Score: 1
    Seriously, riding a bike on roadways is dangerous - you are going slower than the flow of traffic and possibly illegally so. You're annoying the other drivers - drivers who have PAID for the roads with fuel taxes. Yes, people who buy fuel really do have more of a right to use the roads.


    Being alive is dangerous, believe it or not, it will end in death.

    Having said that: I paid for the roads with my taxes too AND I even own a car I have ANY right to be on the road as you do, like it or not. If you have temper issues, maybe you need to get some professional help.

    While you probably don't care, you'll eventually encounter some asshole who does something careless to pass you and ends up getting you seriously injured. Put yourself in the position of the driver - when you're making car payments, buying fuel, and to top it off you're already late from traffic, ending up behind someone on a bicycle can be a very frustrating situation.


    How sad, he has a bad day, so I better don't be where he might get (needlessly) aggrevated over it? If it aggrevates him so much that he blows all the money on fuel, car payments, insurance (which will go up quite a bit if he hits me, not to meanson he might make the car payments from jail)... Well, maybe he should sell the car and get on a bike. Or: Get professionell help.

    Some people actually have deadlines and don't have the luxury of taking their time getting to their destination at a leasurely pace.


    Then I suggest to some people that they plan their day better and only do as much as they can safely do instead of thinking the world has to bend to their wishes.

    I'm not trying to flame, I'm just saying that you DO have a right to use the road like any other public utility provided you contribute your fair share (taxes) and don't disrupt the normal flow of traffic. No one likes someone who pisses in the pool.


    I am not "impeding the flow of traffic" I am not on a highway, I am on a normal road way and the law gives me the right to be there, if you can't get that in your head I suggest you walk (not drive) to the next police station and hand in the keys before you kill someone and find yourself in jail where you can't even walk anywhere.

    Not that I am trying to flame, just pointing things out for you.
    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  147. Become literate! Learn the difference between by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    • "Peddling" means something completely different from what you think:

    Peddling

    • To travel about selling (wares): peddling goods from door to door.
    • To engage in the illicit sale of (narcotics).
    • To seek to disseminate; give out: peddling lies.

    Pedaling / Pedalling

    • To use or operate a pedal or pedals.
    • To ride a bicycle.
    • To operate the pedals of.
  148. Re:Use bike trails or ride during off-peak hours.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen

  149. Re:Use bike trails or ride during off-peak hours.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a dick!

    Bicycles are recognized as vehicles in many state's vehicle code. Bicycles put much less wear and tear on the road surface than a car, so why should they need to pay taxes to support a road surface made for heavier vehicles. He is contributing his fair share, since a bicycle on a road provides negligible wear and tear on the road surface. The weather and the cooling and heating cycles of a normal day put more wear and tear on the road than a small lightweight bicycle. Pay attention before you spout your uneducated libertarian rant.

    In the USA, roads were placed before fuel taxes existed. Fuel taxes only pay for a portion of road maintenance.

  150. My Homemade Electric Bike by RobertS · · Score: 1

    I built my own electric bike as a mobility aid to get to the local shops. I wear two separate leg braces and pedaling was not an option, I also have a very large steep hill between me and the shops. I bought the Slipstream Electric Bicycle plans and modified them a bit. I've had the bike now for over 4 years and I figure around 3,000 miles, very nice ride.

    Max speed 29 mph in about 4 seconds (beat a few motorcycles from the stop, but only if they did not know we were racing)
    Range 30 miles with new batteries.
    Parts cost $2,000.
    Since the photos, I've upgraded to downhill wheels and hubs w/disk brakes.

  151. torque not speed controller by lkcl · · Score: 1

    make sure you get a bike which has, at some point in the drive train, a torque measuring device that will match your own efforts with assisted power.

    the last thing that you want is a speed controller.

    it's pretty straightforward to replace one or both of the pedal cranks with cranks that have torque measuring devices: any [really] serious cyclist will have a heart-rate monitor, speedometer _and_ torque measuring to determine how much pressure they're exerting on the pedals.

    then you turn that into amps...