Slashdot Mirror


Jeopardy! Whiz Becomes Encarta Spokesman

Ant writes "BetaNews' story says Microsoft tapped Jeopardy! king Ken Jennings, who recently finished his 75-game run on the show, to become the spokesman for its Encarta product line. Jennings will embark on a nationwide media tour called 'Quiz the Whiz' that challenges news desks to stump the human encyclopedia with questions from Microsoft's Encarta Reference Library Premium 2005."

339 comments

  1. In Case It Be Dotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative


    Jeopardy! Whiz Becomes Encarta Spokesman
    By Nate Mook, BetaNews
    December 6, 2004, 11:00 AM

    Microsoft has tapped Jeopardy! king Ken Jennings, who recently finished his 75-game run on the show, to become the spokesman for its Encarta product line. Jennings will embark on a nationwide media tour called "Quiz the Whiz" that challenges news desks to stump the human encyclopedia with questions from Microsoft's Encarta Reference Library Premium 2005.

    Jennings broke the game show record books this year and attracted a cult following by answering 2,700 Jeopardy! questions and raking in over $2.5 million in winnings. Before he takes off to Europe with his family next summer, Jennings hopes to pass on some of his passion for learning.

    "It seems like a natural fit: Encarta has a long-standing commitment to furthering education, and I've had a lot of kids tell me that watching me on "Jeopardy!" has made reading and learning seem just a little cooler," Jennings told Microsoft in an interview.

    Jennings also warned against relying solely on the Internet for researching information. "The Internet can be an incredible resource, but the scary thing is you never know what's out there or whether the answer you will find will be accurate. In fact, out of curiosity I searched for myself once and turned up all sorts of erroneous information," he said. "One seemingly reputable and authoritative page even had my name wrong!"

    Ironically, Microsoft also mixed up his name in the interview, referring to the trivia whiz as "Jenkins."

    1. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by Fred+Freddy · · Score: 0

      What Microsoft asked him to say: "The Internet can be an incredible resource, but the scary thing is you never know what's out there or whether the answer you will find will be accurate. That's why I use Microsoft's Trusted Computing technology to make sure that my answers are always correct."

    2. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by marktaw.com · · Score: 5, Funny
      answering 2,700 Jeopardy! questions
      Don't they mean "questioning 2,700 Jeopardy! answers" ???
    3. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't they mean "questioning 2,700 Jeopardy! answers" ???

      So how would Jeopardy work in Soviet Russia?

    4. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would a young person host the Korean version?

    5. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly, Jeopardy is dying. Netcraft confirms it!

    6. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by mibus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't they mean "questioning 2,700 Jeopardy! answers" ???

      No no no, you have it all wrong.

      Me: This Slashdot post calls into doubt the possibly incorrectly phrased "answering 2,700 Jeopardy! questions".

      You: What is "Don't they mean "questioning 2,700 Jeopardy! answers" ???".

      I'll take Karma Bonus for four hundred, thanks!

    7. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ironically, Microsoft also mixed up his name in the interview, referring to the trivia whiz as "Jenkins."

      "Ah, ", continued Ken, "but what's really going to bake your noodle is, would they have spelled it wrong if I hadn't said anything?"

    8. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new Jeapordy questioning (answering?) overlords!

    9. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by aichpvee · · Score: 1
      So how would Jeopardy work in Soviet Russia?

      That's a no-brainer. In Soviet Jeopardy! old Koreans question you.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    10. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know I was wondering how this worked: 1) Star on Jeopardy for many, many episodes 2) profit! 3) Leave Jeopardy 4) ... (currently here) 5) profit!

    11. Re:In Case It Be Dotted by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I just poured hot grits on my buzzer. Thank you.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  2. Jeopardy by The_Moo_Cow · · Score: 1, Funny

    what do you call the first feedback comment on Slashdot ?

    1. Re:Jeopardy by fishmasta · · Score: 1

      What is Frits P0TS!!!!!!1!!!!one!!!!

    2. Re:Jeopardy by CRC'99 · · Score: 1

      what do you call the first feedback comment on Slashdot ?

      A troll.

      --
      Sendmail is like emacs: A nice operating system, but missing an editor and a MTA.
    3. Re:Jeopardy by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      What is "You Fail it" for $200?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    4. Re:Jeopardy by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

      Unless of course, in cases such as this, the first feedback comment is TFA, then your +5 informative. I was shocked.

  3. Stumpers by teh_mykel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stumper question #1: "What is Linux?" either unknown data, or grossly misrepresentive data, or simply undetailed data. Compare "Who is Bill Gates?" for maximum biasm.

    --
    this sig no verb
    1. Re:Stumpers by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      "What is Linux?". I doubt that this question could be asked as the questions are from "Microsoft's Encarta Reference Library Premium 2005."

      The beta version had the following:

      "What is Linux:
      All penguins should die and go back to the Antartic circle where they can be eaten by whales and then have the whales molested by Steve Erwin, giving the whales intergestion. From Bill"

      But it was removed due to protests from the ASPCA and the WWF

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    2. Re:Stumpers by fireman+sam · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just thought of a better question:

      "What is a General protection fault 0x4700AF2D in KERNEL32.DLL:MessageBoxExA+046 EAX 0x00000000 EIP 0x00000000 EDX 0x000010FA"

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    3. Re:Stumpers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stumper question #2: Will a bunch of nerds still look at him as a hero since he will be affiliated with MS. You know the nerd type - they openly denounce MS but use the OS, or have an X-box or MS games.

    4. Re:Stumpers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot....he was a software engineer before he became a jepordy champion!

    5. Re:Stumpers by NightLamp · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hamster out of popcorn, refill the hamper and re-boot for the changes to take effect"

    6. Re:Stumpers by artakka · · Score: 1

      It is the tempoary stack overrflow in the 32 bit to 16 bit thunking code.
      I will take UI bugs for $500 next, please.

    7. Re:Stumpers by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Compare "Who is Bill Gates?" for maximum biasm.

      I don't know when this was, I imagine early 1990s. The correct question was, "What is a sound blaster". I believe the statement was phrased something like this is the first device to offer sound on a computer. Talk about major bias and bogus. I don't know my history but I would have thought the correct question would have to do with the people who first noticed that they could manipulate the EM interference and hear it via their radio. I.e. way before the 1980s.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    8. Re:Stumpers by isolation · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MessageBoxExA is not exported from Kernel32. It would be very hard to answer this bogus question.

      Now you could say
      Kernel32.dll has caused a General Protection fault in module User32:MessageBoxExA

      Thanks
      Steven

      --
      Free Unix? Free Windows. http://www.reactos.com
    9. Re:Stumpers by isolation · · Score: 0

      See my other comment. MessageBoxExA would not cause this type of crash in Thunking as

      1. Why would there be 32/16 thunking on this function call.

      2. MessageBoxExA is not exported from Kernel32.dll

      --
      Free Unix? Free Windows. http://www.reactos.com
    10. Re:Stumpers by It's+People! · · Score: 1

      http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_701610451/Open _Source_Software.html Yeah, that's the most biased answer I've ever seen. Seriously, not everything Microsoft does is a conspiracy to eat your babies.

    11. Re:Stumpers by xeon4life · · Score: 1

      He got a defree in both English and Computer Science you bafoon. He can't have gotten a degree in CS without at least hearing about Linux.

      --
      Real programmers can write assembly code in any language. -- Larry Wall
    12. Re:Stumpers by TomServo · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I had assumed that this looked non-evil simply because of a lack of links to open-source projects as part of the article. Some link to an article on Linux, Apache, or something else would have convinced me otherwise.

      As evidence, I decided to search for Office, assuming I'd find something on MS Office. Instead, I found a link to "Office Quotations", the definition of an office, and something about the British TV series "The Office". So, I went for "Microsoft", and found that it required a subscription to Encarta Premium, and had a link in the "related links" to Open Source Software.

      To this point, I had assumed everything they had done was evil with the notable exception of hardware, they made some fantastic mice, keyboards, steering wheels and joysticks (My Sidewinder 3D joystick is almost 10 years old and still works like the day I bought it), but you're right, I see nothing too nasty here.

      Now, were I to subscribe and find that Microsoft's article contained links on how to purchase copies of MS operating systems, applications software, etc etc, then I'd be a bit convinced, but I'm not willing to pay the subsciption fee when I've got wikipedia around the corner.

    13. Re:Stumpers by OffTheLip · · Score: 1

      Easy one, Windows feature. Be an ironic "Final Jeopardy" question though.

    14. Re:Stumpers by D+H+NG · · Score: 1
    15. Re:Stumpers by rikkards · · Score: 1

      The key is to ask him about Linux and then ask if he got that from Encarta.

  4. PC Encyclopedias by javaman83 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do a lot of people even use these anymore?
    I figured by now, the internet would have overtaken these completely.

    1. Re:PC Encyclopedias by solowCX · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think Microsoft knows CD-ROM encyclopedias are mostly dead, that is why Encarta is mostly a website with a Premium Subscription service now, found at http://encarta.msn.com/.

    2. Re:PC Encyclopedias by adeydas · · Score: 3, Informative

      i used encarta by borrowing it from a friend for sometime and i have gotta say that its nothing more that a glossy and animation-loaded package... britannica encyclopedia or for that matter any other encyclopedia wins hands down.

    3. Re:PC Encyclopedias by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Do a lot of people even use these anymore? I figured by now, the internet would have overtaken these completely.

      I do, but not Encarta. Brittanica is the gold standard. As for the Internet; sure, it's what I use for 99% of my fact checking, but if I actually need some background and something I can feel is authoritative (rather than a say a Wiki that anyone with an axe to grind can distort), I use a real encyclopedia.

    4. Re:PC Encyclopedias by optimusNauta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mostly I would agree. The only time I would use an encyclopedia would be if I am in a library and I need a quick factsheet on something. Wikipedia has pretty much replaced all my software encyclopedia needs. Another victory for Free (as in Freedom) stuff.

    5. Re:PC Encyclopedias by Jonathan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now that I have a doctorate in microbiology I like to look up relevant articles in encyclopedias and see how biased/incorrect they are -- and I find that they are considerbly more biased and wrong than Wikipedia's. BTW, "Britannica" no longer hails from the Royal Isles -- it's just a cheap American brand name, no different from Encarta.

    6. Re:PC Encyclopedias by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 1

      The gold standard? I tried running it from DVD, and it was unbearably slow. I've downloaded it to disk, and while it's faster, it's STILL slow. Add to that it's clunky interface, which looks like Windows 0.1. And did I mention it's slow?

      It's faster to pull down one of the volumes from my 60-era Brittanica. I'm just sorry I still need to dedicate a bookcase to it.

    7. Re:PC Encyclopedias by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 1

      Uh, make that "60s-era". Somehow, I don't think I'll find an encyclopedia that covers 60 eras.

    8. Re:PC Encyclopedias by westlake · · Score: 1
      BTW, "Britannica" no longer hails from the Royal Isles -- it's just a cheap American brand name, no different from Encarta.

      The 11th Edition, the high-water mark of Edwardian scholarship, was published under american ownership in 1910, and by 1929 the encyclopedia was based in Chicago, under the ownership of Sears, Roebuck. So much more than a cheap american brand name, the Brittanica has been in print for 236 years, and at least since the 1960s contributers have not been confined to an anglo-american imperial elite. The Brittanica is a prime example of the emergence of English as a world language.

    9. Re:PC Encyclopedias by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      Actually, the point is being able to install it onto a system (like a laptop) so you can access it without an internet connection and more quickly than via CD-ROM. The internet update feature keeps topics in the news up-to-date, so it's not like it's growing more obsolete as the days pass. (Did I mention I own Encarta 2004?)

    10. Re:PC Encyclopedias by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I like to look up relevant articles in encyclopedias and see how biased/incorrect they are -- and I find that they are considerbly more biased and wrong than Wikipedia's.

      Science is always going to be behind the times in an encyclopedia. And you're able to judge the worth of articles in your own field, but for any random subject, I'd trust Brittanica more than a Wiki by whoever elected themselves to write or rewrite the article.

    11. Re:PC Encyclopedias by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The gold standard? I tried running it from DVD, and it was unbearably slow

      By "gold standard", I wasn't referring to the interface, but the quality of the articles. I've got an older version, since it runs off a CD. I'm about to upgrade my hard disk so then I'll install it to that, along with the Oxford Dictionary. Could only have dreamed of owning the paper versions when I was at school, but got these for a few dollars as used "OEM" discs.

    12. Re:PC Encyclopedias by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      rather than a say a Wiki that anyone with an axe to grind can distort

      As I've stated before, Wikipedia has an excellent track record of freezing pages where the neutrality of the page is disputed, and they freeze it to the edit before the dispute (this is a rare occurence anyway).

      I don't think a "real" encyclopaedia is any more accurate or neutral in general. Is there some sort of guarantee from Britannica or Microsoft that I get my money back if they get something wrong? Oh, I have the assurance of a corporation that it's correct. OK

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    13. Re:PC Encyclopedias by syrinx · · Score: 1

      without an internet connection

      You're scaring me here! Surely that's not possible?!

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    14. Re:PC Encyclopedias by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Is there some sort of guarantee from Britannica or Microsoft that I get my money back if they get something wrong? Oh, I have the assurance of a corporation that it's correct. OK

      And with Wiki, the guarantee you have is?

      I have no idea about MS. They screw up enough in their spellcheckers that I have little faith in their accuracy. As for Brittanica, you believe they have no academic oversight?

    15. Re:PC Encyclopedias by eMartin · · Score: 1

      "As for the Internet; sure, it's what I use for 99% of my fact checking"

      Because if it's on the internet, it has to be true!

    16. Re:PC Encyclopedias by westlake · · Score: 1
      Oh, I have the assurance of a corporation that it's correct. OK

      Brittanica's articles are signed by authors who credentials are right there before you. I'd go out a limb and say that an encyclopedia whose contributers have included many of the best minds of the last 200 years has earned some measure of trust.

    17. Re:PC Encyclopedias by marhar · · Score: 1
      Now that I have a doctorate in microbiology I like to look up relevant articles in encyclopedias and see how biased/incorrect they are

      Yes, I know what you mean. When I only had my masters degree they seemed so authoritative!
    18. Re:PC Encyclopedias by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      And with Wiki, the guarantee you have is?

      You've completely missed the point. The point being that there's no advantage to a "traditional" encyclopaedia.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    19. Re:PC Encyclopedias by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You've completely missed the point. The point being that there's no advantage to a "traditional" encyclopaedia.

      Well, bullshit. "Traditional" encyclopedia have a reputation on the line. If they get it wrong, they lose that, and prestige, and ultimately sales. Also the authors are (for Brittanica, last time I looked) listed and you can check their qualifications. Wiki is just whoever wants to elect themselves an expert.

  5. Wow... by codesurfer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Right after his "loss" on the show. I still say it was a throw. Interesting marketing (and I bet it'll be successful) ploy for MS, I just wish Ken had thrown his popularity behind the open source community.

    1. Re:Wow... by bLindmOnkey · · Score: 1

      Honestly, how would such a celeb like him "[throw] his popularity behind the open source community" The open source community is quite a community, and there is no central entity holding it together like M$ holds its own corperation. Of course, power to the penguin, but it just won't happen, hasn't happened, and probably won't happen anytime soon.

    2. Re:Wow... by mOoZik · · Score: 2

      Oh, here we go with the obligatory anti-MS BS. I say kudos to MS for using his genius to promote an equally awesome product. No one is forcing him.

    3. Re:Wow... by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and didja see the full-page FedEx ad in USA Today the next day?

      Had a pic of Jennings looking confused with 'FedEx' on his monitor.

      Ad said something like, "Maybe the only time 'FedEx' was the right answer".

      A coincidence? Probably. But if news came out that Jeopardy!/FedEx/Jennings had something going on the side, I, for one, would not be shocked.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    4. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, the draw of that huge $0 paycheck must have been really hard for him to turn down.

    5. Re:Wow... by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      For the ad copy,

      s/Maybe the only time 'FedEx'was the right answer/Maybe the only time 'FedEx' was not the right answer/

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    6. Re:Wow... by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Right after his "loss" on the show. I still say it was a throw.
      Indeed- take a look at the final question from the interview; it makes you...wonder.
      I don't consider my last show a loss -- I definitely don't consider this experience something I'm walking away a loser from (laughs). I did feel some relief, as it's been a long and exciting experience for me -- I'm looking forward to spending lots of time with my family.
    7. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ad said something like, "Maybe the only time 'FedEx' was the right answer".

      "Maybe the only time 'FedEx' was the wrong answer".

    8. Re:Wow... by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      You just pointed out the main reason why OSS with it's current do it yourself, elitist attitude will never be able to make much headway into main stream usage.

      Without a central figure you get what Linux is now, dozens of fractured distros catering to niche groups.

      The plan for OSS for this decade should be consolidation. Without a central authority it will continue to fail and fracture.

      Mod me a troll or flamebait if you like, but you know what I'm saying is true. The OSS movement has a lot of potential, it's a shame that's it's being wasted by pride and zealotry.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    9. Re:Wow... by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      But to give it leadership, vision, direction, etc., well, it'll end up being another corporate structure. Even if the product IS open source, what would keep driving such an entity? Profits. So you end up with the Microsoft of the OSS. It's inevitable, and w/o it, it'll remain as it is: stagnant.

    10. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish people would throw their bandwidth at the Mandrake 10.1 Official iso's that are just now available.

      Hit the torrent!

      Mandrake Linux 10.1 Official

    11. Re:Wow... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >. I still say it was a throw.

      Well, if we're going to be dealing in the currency that is conspiracy theories, I'll take "Based on the movie Quiz Show for $500, Alex."

    12. Re:Wow... by Dark+Bard · · Score: 1

      I can't begrudge him for making a few bucks off what is likely to be temporary fame. He's a good guy and deserves some success. Microsoft has money and open source by definition has limited resources. He has every right to think of his family first. Open source verses corporate software is not the first consideration for everyone. Does anyone know if he has any interest in open source or not? Not everyone has a preference. It's a choice of working or not. How many programers out there are working for Microsoft that support open source? How many of them have refused work from Microsoft on principal?

    13. Re:Wow... by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm looking forward to spending lots of time with my family.

      A. This many people have expressed an urge to "spend some time with my family" when not fired, under grand jury investigation, or pissed off.

      Q. What is zero?

      rj

    14. Re:Wow... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      He bricks one question after getting 2,700 right and he's throwing games?

      His Fed-Ex answer certainly had a logic to it. The person that got that one right and won said that she only knew it because one of her good friends works for HR Block.

      What I really wanted to see was for Jeopardy to call up all the old 5 day winners and make Ken play against two of them at a time. Have they ever brought back 5 day winners to play each other? That would be a kick ass tournament.

      -B

    15. Re:Wow... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I'd say the 70 matches before that were a throw.

      Once the guy started getting Jeapordy the kind of ratings that the show had never, ever seen in its 30+ years, it doesn't seem odd to me that they'd "stack the deck", give categories he's good in, and the opponents might not be.

      Then again, he just might be that good with absolutly useless knowledge, in which case, good for him for making it pay off. Most know-it-alls I've met worked at McDonalds.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    16. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that is the "Tournament of Champions" they have every once and a while.

    17. Re:Wow... by euxneks · · Score: 1

      I just wish Ken had thrown his popularity behind the open source community.

      Because we all know how well _that_ pays.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    18. Re:Wow... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      I was talking to someone about this today. I think its more than likely that Jeopardy does its best to never let people like Jennings compete. There are probably hundreds of fact wizzes like him out there and if someone does too well in the opening tests they get turned down. Dominating the game makes it look easy, defeats competition, etc. Maybe Jennings isn't that special, he just slipped through.

    19. Re:Wow... by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      w/o it [leadership, vision, direction, etc.?], [open-source will] remain as it is: stagnant.

      Ouch. Somehow I really very much doubt that anyone who's followed an open-source project these days thinks they're stagnating.
      In addition, how can one end up with a "Microsoft of the OSS"? That entity, whatever it is, would have to control almost all features of the product, which is virtually against the very definition of "open source".
      Even if one argues that (for a perhaps less-than-apt -- ahem -- example; someone will correct me on this, I'm sure -- as they should; I release this post under no license) RedHat is somewhat of a controller of linux, there are a LOT of flavors of linux, in addition to BSD (dead or not :), etc. And, believe you me, these other distros aren't going to throw in with RedHat.

    20. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although technically it was the wrong question .

    21. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a complete tool, and further attempts at making something of yourself should be halted immediately, out of respect for all of us with smart ideas. Thank you.

    22. Re:Wow... by JayBees · · Score: 1

      Assuming this isn't a joke, are you aware the show on which he lost was recorded back in September? Jeopardy films weeks worth of episodes in a few days.

    23. Re:Wow... by T3kno · · Score: 1

      Although I love a conspiracy theory as much as the next guy. I also get giddy when I see any large corporation in trouble, I have schadenfreude in a bad way :) I think the following scenario is more likely. Since we all read that Ken lost a couple of months ago right here on /., we can safely assume we weren't the only ones who knew in advance that Ken lost. Since marketing/television whores^H^H^H^H^H^Hexecs are all the same, and that they all know each other (think frat boys/sorority girls) I'm sure that news spread through their pathetic little community like wild fire as soon as the episode finished taping. Some FedEx marketing "genius" came up with what I consider a contrived and useless advertisement for yet another worthless company whom I can blame for giving my skip 30 secs finger an RMI.

      I'm also really bummed out that Ken sold out to the man. I was holding out hope that he was a Linux zealot, or at least an OS X fanatic. I'll bet he beats encarta, but I'd take wikipedia any day of the week over him.

      --
      (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
    24. Re:Wow... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Then again, he just might be that good with absolutly useless knowledge, in which case, good for him for making it pay off. Most know-it-alls I've met worked at McDonalds.

      Nope, not McDonalds. Record shops and game stores, those are both guaranteed to have regular Stephen Hawkings working the register.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    25. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wish Ken had thrown his popularity behind the open source community.

      Why the hell would he do that?

    26. Re:Wow... by bobobobo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well he is LDS(Mormon) and one of the central tenets of the religion is family. Genuinely loving your family and wanting to spend time with them. He's being honest here, it is a classic answer any self-respecting Latter-Day Saint would give.

    27. Re:Wow... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Your post uses some of the craziest logic of all time. Let me quote: "There are probably hundreds of fact wizzes like him out there and if someone does too well in the opening tests they get turned down."

      If there are hundreds of "fact wizzes" out there at any given time is it not conceivable that they could select >1 of them to be on the show at one time? If Jennings "isn't that special" and "just slipped through" couldn't they let another "slip through" and take him out?

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    28. Re:Wow... by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Hello, moderators. Can somebody please mod the parent up to at least give it equal weight with the craptastically cynical grandparent?

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    29. Re:Wow... by TomServo · · Score: 1

      The problem is, that plan is solely pointed towards making more headway/money. Part of the beauty of OSS is that we can get exactly what we want.

      Some people like Mandrake, because it has a nice installer, works well out of the box, and is reasonably easy to maintain. Myself, I like Gentoo, because I get a kick out of doing a stage 1 install, I find emerge to be about the best damn software management system I've ever used, and I love the flexibility I get simply from make.conf. If it consolidates, it loses all of that.

      It's almost like saying cars will fail unless there's a focus on a specific type of car, be it expensive but fancy new cars, reliable but not-so-fancy "certified" used cars, or cheap, fix-it-up cars. Admittedly, most of the market is for new cars, at least from the corporations, but despite all the money car companies make off new car sales and the marketing muscle they have, there's still a market for vintage, fix-it cars. There will always be, it will never die. Linux, IMHO, will fill that niche until something better comes along. It will never take over the desktop, and it shouldn't aim to. It should aim to continue to be the best for the DIY computer user, continually improve, and it'd be foolish to aim for the overall computer market, the same market that gets online via AOL. As soon as it does, we'll all ditch it for the next DIY system, then espouse its virtues until it crosses over to the dark side.

    30. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, here we go with the obligatory anti-MS BS.

      And here I go with the obligatory anti-idiot comment. Read what he wrote. Read it again. And again. And again. Where is the "anti-MS BS"? What, you mean it was a figment of your imagination?

    31. Re:Wow... by Teddy+Beartuzzi · · Score: 1
      It depends on how you think "season", and your background. Myself, I was thinking holiday season like Ken, and didn't come up with a good answer. My wife, a banker, immediately said H&R Block.

      I find the more suspicious miss the Bastogne daily double. As a movie buff, Ken surely had to see numerous movies detailing this, including Band of Brothers.

      But I don't think he threw it.

    32. Re:Wow... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I say kudos to MS for using his genius

      You mean "memory", not genius.

    33. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She swallowed the spider to swallow the fly...

      I don't know why she swallowed the fly,

      perhaps she'll die.

    34. Re:Wow... by GTRacer · · Score: 1
      I can't begrudge him for making a few bucks off what is likely to be temporary fame.

      You mean, AFTER H&R Block helps him settle up with Uncle Sam over the $2.5 mil he pocketed from Trebek?

      Heck, he'll probably need FedEx to deliver all that loot. I'd suspect anything on top of his winnings, his salary, and his family time is all gravy!

      GTRacer
      - "What is Zimbabwe?", quite possibly the only question my sister got right

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    35. Re:Wow... by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone acting like Ken Jennings WON'T be on the next Jeopardy Tourney of Champions?

      Not only will he be on as many as possible, Jeopardy (Kingworld Productions) will market the hell out of each time Jennings comes back to play Jeopardy.

  6. Here's an answer you won't hear him say.... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 0

    What are Natalie Portman and Hot Grits?

    1. Re:Here's an answer you won't hear him say.... by dirkdidit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Answer: Starting after Star Wars Episode I, these two things are known to cause blindness, deafness and hairy palms in geeks.

    2. Re:Here's an answer you won't hear him say.... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 3, Funny

      Edible? Well, I don't know about the grits...

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
  7. Trivia versus knowledge by YetAnotherName · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If there were a moderation, "1, Cynical", I'm sure I'd get it, but seriously ... for all of the knowledge apparently amassed by Mr Jennings, there is still a difference between trivia and knowledge. And there is a distinct whiff of one of the most vile of odors: marketing.

    1. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering how long he has to study before the tour...

    2. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

      still a difference between trivia and knowledge

      But I'd be willing to bet there is a large positive correlation between the two.

      Yes, I'd mod you cynical. There is no evidence to indicate Ken Jennings was a moron with a great memory. IN the two shows I say (other people's houses), he was quick with comebacks to Alex. I also understand he was an engineer.

      And as for marketing... get over it. Ken wants to make some more money. Good luck Ken!

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're correct. However trivia is knowing alot of little bits about different things. None of those bits are necessarily useful by themselves unless you're in a trivia competition.

      Knowledge of a subject implies you understand it and can implement or apply, not spout a handful of factoids

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    4. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. But many of the comments seem to indicate no correlation between the two, or even a negative correlation.

      I choose to be happy for Ken. I wonder why so many others choose to be envious.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      a lot is two words :->

    6. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by finkployd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However trivia is knowing alot of little bits about different things. None of those bits are necessarily useful by themselves unless you're in a trivia competition.

      Wow, I totally disagree with that. I have found that having some working knowledge in a wide range of topics is better (overall) than knowing everything about one small topic. Most of the people I know who focus with laser like intensity on one small field are complete failures at every other aspect of their life. And I work at a University, I know a lot of these people ;)

      Personally, I am first and formost a middleware/security/cryptography geek, but I also get into history (specifically wars), economics (my major in college), music, biology, and other various topics that strike my fancy.

      I certainly am no expert on these topics, I probably do not pass the level you would consider trivia. I do, however, consider my life greatly enriched by learning all of these little factiods and trivia. At the very least I do not feel lost if conversation turns to something other than middleware/security/cryptography. Which (suprisingly) happens a lot, people just don't seem as excited about that stuff as I am in normal social situations :)

      Finkployd

    7. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I understand your point, I'm not so sure I agree in general terms. Knowing some stupid little cultural/technical/botanical factoid has hauled my ass out of the fire on one or two occasions.

    8. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by niittyniemi · · Score: 1

      > And there is a distinct whiff of one of the most vile of odors: marketing.

      I have to agree.

      Everything I hear about this Ken Jennings makes me dislike him.

      Why didn't he use his position as "unchallenged uber-geek" to do something for the general public good rather than flogging some crumb-ridden piece of crap?

      String 'im up with cat5 is what I say! He's made us geeks look like a bunch of tuppeny whores.


      --
      Buy me an iPod NOW!

      --
      The Machine stops.
    9. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by edsarkiss · · Score: 1

      There is no evidence to indicate Ken Jennings was a moron with a great memory.

      however, there is a lot of evidence that indicates he is a Mormon with a great memory.

      --

      SIGUSR1
    10. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I suppose it really depends on how granular you're being with your definition of trivia. It also somewhat depends on your direciton of study, as trivia to an EE could well be holy writ to an arts major.

      I guess I segregate factoids into trivia categories depending on how relevant they are. Of course something I call trivia is probably relevant to someone, but --well, for example, knowing how to do a laplace transform on a circuit is something I do, and highly technical, but knowing when Laplace first published a paper (1771) isn't really useful in any sort of context without more information--trivia.

      I hope that made some sense.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    11. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Personally, I believe that the instant trivia becomes useful, it ceases to be trivia.

    12. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by gid · · Score: 1

      Heck, I'd do the same thing as him: go for a big pile of money. Who knows what he's going to do with it, for all I know he's donating it to charity. I'd at least like to think that's what I'd do in his shoes.

    13. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by Synbiosis · · Score: 1

      Most of the people I know who focus with laser like intensity on one small field are complete failures at every other aspect of their life. Yes, but these are the people who actually *discover* new things. =P

    14. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by XO · · Score: 1

      What is "Ken Jennings is out to make some more cash?"

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    15. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yes, but often the people with wide knowledge are the ones who _integrate_ these new things into something more useful than the single new thing.

      --
    16. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... who focus with laser like intensity...

      I don't know, but you are beginning to sound like Shrub.

    17. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by ratamacue · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I choose to be happy for Ken. I wonder why so many others choose to be envious.

      I'll take a stab at that. You are part of the group that realizes that wealth is created -- not simply discovered and collected -- by those with the will and motivation to make it happen. The envious people are part of the group that thinks wealth has always existed, and the rich are the ones who simply got there first or took more than their "fair share".

    18. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by gosand · · Score: 1
      I choose to be happy for Ken. I wonder why so many others choose to be envious.

      Really? I choose not to care.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    19. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For fucksake, even Ayn Rand would denounce Ken as a collectivist pig - trivia is, by definition, useless. That money could have gone to something rational, like a 2500-story building in the middle of Manhattan, or an 8-lane railroad crossing the US five times, or...

    20. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by Otter · · Score: 1
      If there were a moderation, "1, Cynical", I'm sure I'd get it, but seriously ... there is a distinct whiff of one of the most vile of odors: marketing.

      Whoah! You mean this marketing campaign has something to do with marketing? Do you subscribe to that "Adbusters" magazine where they laboriously explain these matters to their readers or did you figure it out all by yourself?

    21. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure they are, spanky.

    22. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by databyss · · Score: 1

      except those those things would cost much much more than $2.5 million.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    23. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      Funny, but I think we all know the answer to that: Since Ken entered into a contract with Jeopardy voluntarily, this production of wealth for mutual benefit was entirely rational.

    24. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that, given the options presented to Ken, his actions were rational and that he was not coerced.

      However, to think that Jeopardy! prize money is some kind of magically "created wealth", the same way that the revenues of technological endeavours are, is absurd and, upon reflection, makes a pretty good mockery of St. Rand's religion.

      That is, if everyone acts in a self-interested manner, then there is no one to "watch out" for an invading collectivist system reapportioning wealth and making up simulated challenges. If you don't mind 1) having faith that the technically skilled supermen will realize this and 2) the periodic civil war and anarchy that will ensue upon their realizing this, then there is no problem. I am too (1) cynical and (2) weary for this - aside from that, though, objectivism sounds like a fun way to live.

      Please tell me how these points are addressed - Ms. Rand seems to wave them away.

    25. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      Voluntary trade is the only possible way to create wealth, because of the principle of mutual benefit. The first party gains (+1), and the second party gains (+1), and the net sum is positive: wealth is created. This is equivalant to a government taking money from one party by force and distributing it to another party. The second party gains (and so does government of course), but ONLY at the first party's expense. No wealth is created.

      Force can never create wealth -- only transfer it from one party to another. When a thief takes money by force, he gains (+1) only at the expense of the victim (-1). The net sum is zero; no wealth is created.

      The contract between Ken and Jeopardy is clearly voluntary; both parties benefit from the transaction, and thus wealth is created.

    26. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by ratamacue · · Score: 1
      Uh, this

      This is equivalant to a government taking money from one party by force and distributing it to another party. The second party gains (and so does government of course), but ONLY at the first party's expense. No wealth is created.

      obviously belongs under the second paragraph. Where is the post editing capability on slashdot?

    27. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the first paragf. is pretty obvious, except for the naivete in the +1,+1 pair. The inevitable outcome of capitalism is that some originating parties become real or de facto monopolies, and those numbers end up looking like +x, +(1/x). As long as we are quantifying this kind of stuff, I can argue that slavery creates wealth also. If I benefit +x from my slave while he "benefits" -y for being a slave as opposed to living the life he would have lived without my intervention, there is still a net positive change of wealth, as long as yx, which is possible. This is not my problem, however.

      Mostly agreed w.r.t. force not creating wealth. However, it is not obvious to me that all human activities need to create wealth immediately. e.g. the funding of pure science: costs $$$, only a slim chance of eventual payoff. There is also the idea of force as deterrence for unwanted behavior. This still isn't my problem, though.

      My problem is with the idea of calling Jeopardy! winnings "wealth" without distinguishing it from the kind of real wealth generated by technical advancement. To continue this example, Jennings is actually being paid to provide an audience and thus advertising revenue. Jeopardy! is not creating a natural good, service or technology; it is only acting as an intermediary between advertisers and the television watching public, with Jennings a means to an end. If the television watching public does not benefit from the advertisements shown by the collectivist media, there is no reason for me to think this is not theft, with Ken Jennings supporting it with his skills.

      It is arguable whether or not the public benefits from these advertisements, much moreso than it is for the simple industrial examples Ms. Rand was fond of. One could weasel out by saying that TV watchers enter a reasonable contract with the advertisers; however, this doesn't square with the objectivist belief that common people are arational slime.

      Maybe the question is then, whether it is consistent to be a "Madison Avenue"-objectivist and live solely by exploiting the arational?

    28. Re:Trivia versus knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, it was fun talking with you anyway, ratamacue.

      Maybe I'll understand "objectivism" one day and then I can decide rationally (in the formalism of game theory) whether the majority of its followers are short-sighted, or the philosophy itself is incomplete.

  8. I.. by double-oh+three · · Score: 4, Funny

    I felt a disturbance in the force, as if 10 thousand nerds cried out and then were silent.

    --
    "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    1. Re:I.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now only if the nerd who wrote the parent post had been silent.

      I know Slashdot is News for Nerds, but it shouldn't be Let's throw in our favorite Star Wars quote or Let's retell the article in terms of Middle-Earth.

    2. Re:I.. by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, like you didn't internally curse his decision to work with Mordo^H^H^H^Hicrosoft when you read the headline? Yes, I'm using a cliche, but it's also fairly true, so they should at least even out.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
  9. Why is it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that when I see the phrase 'natural fit' in a MS press release, I think of some poor bastard yet again taking it in the ass from BG?

    1. Re:Why is it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not called microsoft for nothing you know

  10. Microsoft Still Publishes Encarta?!?!? by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously? I thought Encarta died a long time ago. It was useful about 10 years ago, back in the days before I had net access.

    Does anyone still actually use it?

    1. Re:Microsoft Still Publishes Encarta?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, it did die a long time ago. Search engines and online encyclopaedias essentially put it out of business, which is probably why Microsoft now needs a famous spokesperson for it, in a hopeless attempt at revival.

    2. Re:Microsoft Still Publishes Encarta?!?!? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      I use the electronic version. It's a bit bulky (the option for a simpler layout with emphasis on plain text would be nice), but otherwise it's an excellent tool. And the "internet update" feature keeps it useful.

    3. Re:Microsoft Still Publishes Encarta?!?!? by Momoru · · Score: 1

      Yeah i had no idea that Encarta exists either, especially as a stand-alone product. I remember when PC encyclopedias were all the rage because of the multimedia content...i remember being awestruck by watching the kennedy moon speech on a PC at CompUSA, but you could never cite them as a source for papers in school, so once the thrill of videos wore off they were pretty useless. I guess its nice for kids to have at least one guaranteed accurate source for information on their PC, though the entry about Bill Gates being defined as the most handsome and cunning man in the world always threw me off.

  11. Quiz the Bizz by nauticalsland · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is gonna make lots of Green backs on this one....

  12. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    me: "How fast can you run?"
    Jennings: "well, I don't see how it's relevent..but I can" WHAM! "......"

    1. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH You, sir, are stupid.

  13. Mistaken Identity by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... I searched for myself once and turned up all sorts of erroneous information...One seemingly reputable and authoritative page even had my name wrong!"

    Just a guess, but maybe they were talking about someone else?

  14. creepy.... by BicycloHexane · · Score: 0

    Is it me or is there just something creepy about taht guy....

    1. Re:creepy.... by wayne606 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's see... Painfully clean-cut, Mormon, works for Microsoft... Thinks "watching me on Jeopardy! has made reading and learning seem just a little cooler"..

      Actually my theory is that Bill Gates got tired of being the nerdiest guy around Redmond...

  15. H&R Block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I was thinking he would be the H&R Block spokeman...

    Although I guess by doing this he isn't lamenting over his mistake as he would have been with H&R Block. Also, I'm sure MS's deep pockets had something to do with this decision...

  16. Noooooo! by bdesham · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...but we spent so much time on your Wikipedia article!

    (Seriously, look at that article... someone put waaay too much time into it.)

    --
    Alcohol and Calculus don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
    1. Re:Noooooo! by bbdd · · Score: 1

      someone put waaay too much time into it

      lots of people, actually. and this currently only shows back to 31oct.

    2. Re:Noooooo! by emrysk · · Score: 1

      Aaaah, come on. If Open Source advocates had lives, where would Linux be?

    3. Re:Noooooo! by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      It's not too much until someone lists every question Ken Jennings missed (i.e., lost money on) through all 75 shows. That's the list I want!

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Encarta... Who Cares? by MBCook · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I remember when CD drives first became popular in computers, encyclopedias on CD were a big deal and Encarta was very popular. It was on a CD encyclopedia (under Win 3.1) that I saw the famous footage of the Hindenburg disaster for the first time that I can remember (that was also the first video clip I can ever remember seeing on a computer).

    But I saw Encarta in a computer store the other day and thought... so what? With the internet now common and simple to use to find things (thanks to Google and it's forefathers), why would I want to pay for an encyclopedia on CD/DVD?

    As a promotion goes, it's a good idea, except it seems like trying to sell horse & buggy carts to 1920s urbanites. It's a product that is past it's prime and will dissapear soon.

    PS: Ken Jennins, works as a programmer in Utah, hired by MS. I can make a conspiracy out of that :)

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      Exactly. CD encyclopedias are as dead as the ones made from pulp.

      Good for Ken, though. I expect that if he sharpens his public speaking he could hit that circuit and make an extra 5K per talk or more. Though, Ken probably already knows that.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    2. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think he could definatly parlay his success into speaking engaugements for graduations, maybe for motivational/public speaking classes, study advice (he must know good ways), etc. He seems to be pretty at ease in front of a croud, doesn't have an annoying voice, etc. There is a lot he could do.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by AvitarX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well when I first used a computer encyclapedia it was a 1x CD ROM. The net is much faster for me now, but many people don't have broadband, so that sound clip of Beethoven may be a long time in coming.

      If you are stuck with dial up (especialy 14.4k) and want to see pictures and hear sounds and see movies about the stuff you are looking up the CD still has it's place. The slowest CD drives you can find operational are, at 8 mbps, fast enough to be a good broadband connection (8x arbitraily decided as the slowest still around).

      If there was a good (not encarta) cheap (not Britanica) encyclapedia that I could install totally to my HD and not worry about the CD (making it as convenient as broadband) I would buy it. probably pay 3 figures for it too, and willingly subscribe for automatically downloaded updates.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    4. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by se7en11 · · Score: 2
      that was also the first video clip I can ever remember seeing on a computer

      I remember being awed over the Weazer song "Buddy Holy" on the Win95 CD.

      Ahh the good ole days....when 90 MHz was all you needed to be cool.

    5. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      When we first got Encarta back when I was 15 on our Aptiva, the very first thing I saw was Neil Armstrong's first walking on the moon. It blew me away. I had never seen it and the ability to see videos of stuff like that was amazing at the time.

      Alas, as all things go, the internet one upped that I don't really see the point for a cd encyclopedia anymore.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    6. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was on a CD encyclopedia (under Win 3.1) that I saw the famous footage of the Hindenburg disaster for the first time that I can remember (that was also the first video clip I can ever remember seeing on a computer).

      Hmm... the first video clip I can ever remember seeing on a computer (back in '93) was one of an ejaculating female. I've never had a CD encyclopedia be that educational. (Yeah, say what you like about your average Slashdotter and lack of sex, but unless you've slept with a woman that has this ability, you'd never know. Of course, now one can find out by reading SPAM.)

    7. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by MBCook · · Score: 1
      Yeah. That amazed me too (and on my 386 no less!).

      Of course, it ran fine. Then I installed 95 and it wouldn't run smooth anymore because 95 took up more resources than 3.1.

      And I would have KILLED for 90mhz back then. Simpler times.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    8. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I expect that if he sharpens his public speaking he could hit that circuit and make an extra 5K per talk or more. Though, Ken probably already knows that.

      Maybe not. That seems like a seasonal type job to me...

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    9. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good question.

      What software company did he work for in Utah?

      I hope the answer is not SCO.

    10. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I have not seen anything lower than 24x in a long time, aside from a 12x which was questionable as to whether it still functioned.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    11. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Maybe not. That seems like a seasonal type job to me...

      Do you think that someone will win 75x next year? Unlikely. Ken will have the gold badge of his accomplishment for many years to come. 74 wins + the suspiscion that he intentionally gave up the 75th win because -- who knows why -- is enough of a calling card. What he does with it is up to him.

      People will always pay big bucks to 'learn the secrets' that usually aren't secrets.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    12. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by westlake · · Score: 1
      As a promotion goes, it's a good idea, except it seems like trying to sell horse & buggy carts to 1920s urbanites. It's a product that is past it's prime and will dissapear soon.

      The Encarta 2005 DVD set ranks #124 in software sales on Amazon.com, which is by no means bad.
      The problem with Google is that there is no straightforward way of finding a source that is authoritative, well-written, and appropriate for a particular age group or non-specialist reader.

    13. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "Exactly. CD encyclopedias are as dead as the ones made from pulp."

      I don't agree. There is still a need for off-line, static sources of information.

      What happens with on-line encyclopedias is something like this...

      Fred: 'Hey, did you know ???'

      Joe: 'There is no way thats true'

      Fred: 'It is, look I will prove it in this online encyclopedia where I looked it up the other day'.

      Joe: 'Tell you what, lets bet $20 on it'

      Fred (having read this just yesterday in the fabulous online encyclopedia thats continuouslyu kept up to date): 'Your on!'

      [looks up online encyclopedia only to find that the entry for has been updated. Fred loses $20. Joe is having a laugh at Freds expense]

      There is a place for 'fixed' knowledge.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    14. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Actually I always loved Encarta. The thing is, that it's got a lot of good articles on a range of very interesting topics and you can spend literally days just flicking through and reading them. People say "but the internet!!" which is fine but on the web you don't get lots of videos, interactive 3D models, animations, an interactive atlas, sounds and so on. Believe it or not, these really do make a difference. Encarta was always one of my favourite products from Microsoft.

    15. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      Too bad for Fred.

      1. There is a place for 'fixed' knowledge.

      Encyclopedias? I doubt even libraries are keeping them around these days!

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    16. Re:Encarta... Who Cares? by westlake · · Score: 1
      I collect the Brittanica, Brittanica yearbooks, etc., each is like an opening a time capsule. It is fascinating to come across an author whose life and work still resonates after fifty-years, seventy-five years, a hundred.

      I quite agree that interactive content, videos, animations, sounds and maps, can be wonderfully helpful and a pleasure in themselves. I wish you could retrieve more than just snippets, everyone has seen the newsreel footage of the Hindenberg crash, but not what it was like to make the Atlantic crossing in an airship.

  19. Why Encarta? by LGagnon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Give him a real challenge: ask him questions from Wikipedia. Encarta doesn't have half the information that Wikipedia has.

    1. Re:Why Encarta? by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      If you just look at the number of articles, you're right. According to Microsoft, Encarta 2005 has 68,000 articles. Compare that to the Wikipedia, which claims to have 415,957 pages that are "probably legitimate articles". Going by just the number of articles, the Wikipedia has more than 6 times as much information.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    2. Re:Why Encarta? by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      True, but at least Encarta does fact-checking, however corporate-biased it may be. There've been false "facts" on Wikipedia for months, I've seen it happen. (And no, I didn't fix it, since it was a research project into the accuracy of the wiki.)

    3. Re:Why Encarta? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, name 100 names from Wikipedia's "List of Jews" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jews

      Or how about the wonderful list of "Blood Libels against Jews".
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_blood _libels_ against_Jews

      Wonderful super-anti-semit-troll propiganda, eh? Why the flying fuck do you need a "List of Jews" in an encyclopedia other than to pronounce anti-semitism?

      --
    4. Re:Why Encarta? by docflan · · Score: 1

      Right ... but at least the information in Encarta has been fact checked.

    5. Re:Why Encarta? by bit+trollent · · Score: 1

      Give him a real challenge: ask him questions from Wikipedia. Encarta doesn't have half the information that Wikipedia has.

      I've got one: What is the GNAA?

    6. Re:Why Encarta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but at least Encarta does fact-checking, however corporate-biased it may be

      Ummm...Wikipedia does have bias on some of their controversial articles such as Wal-Mart, George W. Bush, etc., which is why there are several NPOV disputes. It may not "corporate-biased" but "personal-bias" are just as bad for a an 'pedia article.

    7. Re:Why Encarta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_libel
      http:/ /en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_by_nat ionality

    8. Re:Why Encarta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      415,957 pages that are "probably legitimate articles" doesn't do much for you if it's only 80% accurate at best. How do you know what to trust?

    9. Re:Why Encarta? by westlake · · Score: 1
      415,957 pages that are "probably" legitimate articles

      somehow this doesn't inspire confidence in the editorial standards of the Wikipedia

    10. Re:Why Encarta? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Yeah great idea, but the wiki at which point in time?

      By the time he gets to answer the question, the wiki entry might have been updated...

      You'd have to take a dump of the wikis database when the show starts and call that it.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  20. gotta admit by jwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He is the perfect spokes person... i mean sheesh, he swept the "beer and wine" topic one night-- and he's a Mormon folks. He's an information sponge.

    1. Re:gotta admit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He is the perfect spokes person... i mean sheesh, he swept the "beer and wine" topic one night-- and he's a Mormon folks.

      Bah, what does that mean? I had a friend once who was Mormon and he drank all the time. None of that cleaned-up Mormon language from him, either; it was always "#%&@ this!" and "&*$# that!" Of course, he was known to tell a tall tale every now and then, so maybe that whole Mormon thing was, you know, just a bunch of ?&#@$#*@.

  21. I see then, Mr. Jenkins by Rie+Beam · · Score: 1

    '"It seems like a natural fit: Encarta has a long-standing commitment to furthering education, and I've had a lot of kids tell me that watching me on "Jeopardy!" has made reading and learning seem just a little cooler," Jennings told Microsoft in an interview.'

    http://chronicle.com/free/2000/08/2000081501t.htm

  22. that stinks by wizardNinja · · Score: 1

    He was so cool and so smart...and then he pulls in with microsoft.....well, i guess its a good way to get a lot of money for nothing.

    --
    -- +
    1. Re:that stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even Wizards and Ninjas use Linux.

      Uh oh, that's bad news, because we all know that the purpose of the ninja is to flip out and kill people.

      I guess wizards are okay though...

  23. I agree. by pb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He must have thrown it. He got both Daily Doubles, and drew a blank on both of them. Then he answers "FedEx"? And then what's worse, that smile he has afterwards. No, subconsciously or not, he could have won it and didn't.

    Of course the next thing to look into--were people betting on when he was going to lose?

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    1. Re:I agree. by wayne606 · · Score: 1

      And then the woman who beat him lost the next evening... I guess it's not impossible he just got tired of making $40K for an hour's work...

    2. Re:I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I shoulda got in on those bets.

      They announced that he lost on the Today show (or one of them) back in February. They even showed a clip of his 74-day total winnings.

    3. Re:I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing. They didn't even tape the show till several months after that.

    4. Re:I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Astoundingly, they actually tape the Jeopardy shows in advance.

    5. Re:I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a matter of fact, I (and my friends watching) were amazed at how much harder the Daily Doubles in question were in comparison to the rest of the questions on the board. Granted, the guy's a genius, but i think he really was just stumped.

    6. Re:I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit. Ken STARTED his streak in Feb. His loss wasn't taped until a couple of months later. Eddies in the space time continuium...

  24. Re:This whole thing was RIGGED anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn man. You sound like a freakin stalker.
    I hope for Ken's sake you're a chick ;)

  25. For those who has never used Encarta by jsse · · Score: 0, Redundant
  26. False knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok .. Microsft Encarta .. with all the bugs/errors found in all the Microsoft products I've used .. I have to speculate how many of the "facts" in Encarta are just plain wrong or fabricated. Yeah, so this is testing his knowledge of whatever's in Encarta .. not exactly a test of factual knowledge.

    1. Re:False knowledge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok .. Microsft Encarta .. with all the bugs/errors found in all the Microsoft products I've used .. I have to speculate how many of the "facts" in Encarta are just plain wrong or fabricated. Yeah, so this is testing his knowledge of whatever's in Encarta .. not exactly a test of factual knowledge.

      You should also speculate on how wrong or fabricated information on the internet is at large, including your post. Anyway, how's the weather under the bridge?

  27. Makes you wonder ... by merdaccia · · Score: 3, Funny
    Ironically, Microsoft also mixed up his name in the interview, referring to the trivia whiz as "Jenkins."

    How priceless would it be if they got his name wrong in Encarta too.

    --

    *blinking cursor*

    1. Re:Makes you wonder ... by rzebram · · Score: 1

      Oh, the possibilities... I want to hear what he says when they tell him he got his name wrong when asked.

  28. Questions for KenJen by xmedar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What causes Pip in poultry?
    How old is Mae West?
    Who was the last British heavyweight champion of the world?
    How far is Winnipeg from Montreal?
    When did Florence Nightingale die?
    What is the height of the Empire State Building? What was the date of General Gordon's death?

    and last but not least

    What are the Thirty-Nine Steps? Come on! Answer up! What are the Thirty-Nine Steps?

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    1. Re:Questions for KenJen by freeweed · · Score: 1

      How far is Winnipeg from Montreal?

      Driven through Canada in late summer/early fall, about 26 hours. It's a beautiful drive for much of it, especially the stretch around Lake Superior. The park there is one of the best outside of the coasts and the Rockies.

      (spoken from experience, and I highly recommend this road trip to anyone who enjoys many hours a day behind the wheel)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:Questions for KenJen by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

      How about:

      What company's employees only work 4 months of the year?

      --
      My rights don't need management.
  29. That's it? by fearanddread · · Score: 5, Funny
    75 shows and then he gets to be the Encarta spokesman? Seems a bit of a letdown somehow.

    I'd like to see a Texas cage match between Jennings and Trebek.... winner gets Jeopardy hosting duties.

    1. Re:That's it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alex Trebek: Let's just go with Drummers Named Ringo for 400. And the answer is: This Ringo was the 'Starr' drummer for the Beatles.
      [Connery buzzes in]
      Alex Trebek: Sean Connery, the drummer for the Beatles.
      Connery: Craven Morehead.
      Alex Trebek: Who is Craven Morehead?
      Connery: Apparently, you are.

    2. Re:That's it? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      I think Jennings has already earned legitimate consideration for the hosting job should he want it when Trebek retires.

    3. Re:That's it? by Jinsaku · · Score: 1

      If that ever happens, I'd watch Jeopardy a heck of a lot more often. As good as Alex is, Ken has that fantastic voice and just *radiates* charisma, moreso than Alex ever did.

      --
      -- Jinsaku
    4. Re:That's it? by billlion · · Score: 1

      I wonder if he will be succesful Encyclopaedia Salesman?

      Salesman: Burglar, madam.

      Woman: What do you want?

      Salesman: I want to come in and steal a few things, madam.

      Woman: Are you an encyclopaedia salesman?

      Salesman: No madam, I'm a burglar, I burgle people ..............

      (Salesman enters through door.)

      Salesman: Mind you I don't know whether you've really considered the advantages of owning a really fine set of modern encyclopaedias...(he pockets valuable) You know, they can really do you wonders.

      Monty Python's Flying Circus
      Series 1, Episode 5: Encyclopaedia Salesman

    5. Re:That's it? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      Alex has a few great moments with Ken though, mostly as a result of not knowing what else to ask him and being forced to improvise. It showed that Alex actually has character that he rarely exposes since he usually robotically reads from his cards and screens...

  30. Encarta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about an encyclopedia with a bit more... review? Even dead tree encyclopedias reviewed by tons of doctors and PhDs before ever hitting the presses have contained errors. I'm curious as to what the credentials and number of reviewers and editors for each and every article are. Sure, Encarta is fine for the target audience - primary school research papers - but beyond that, does it real have any use?

    1. Re:Encarta by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Encarta isn't really 'fine' at all. It started out as a seriously discount paper encyclopedia, and it hasn't improved much at all. For example, take the biographical entry for Alexander Hamilton. It correctly puts a question mark next to the birt date, but then completely fails to discuss the controversy surrounding the birth date. Just recently, Wikipedia was dinged by a reviewer for exactly this sort of shallowness. Wikipedia fixed the problem the very same day the review came out.

      The original paper encyclopedia Microsoft used as a source was Funk and Wagnall's New World Encyclopedia. It's not published any more. They used to be sold in supermarkets for $0.99 for the first volume, and $5 for the remaining volumes. I can't tell you how many people in the rinky dink town I grew up in had just the first volume of that encyclopedia, which they got for a buck at the grocery store. Lots of biology science papers were written on the ecology of the aardvark in those days.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    2. Re:Encarta by malfunct · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet that Encarta is a compilation of articles and content written by other reputable sources rather than Encarta authoring its own content. I have a feeling that Encarta is about as accurate (though vauge) as any other average home encylopedia.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    3. Re:Encarta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In Wikipedia the "problems" is being "fixed" all the time. Though, whether there is a problem or was it fixed, or a new problem is created is highly debatable. If you take you as a reference, sure wikipedia is great, but when you take yourself as a reference and start asking real questions, wikipedia has its own problems. Oh, don't get me wrong, I love wikipedia, but I am not the type to say wikipedia is the best resource out there and everything else sucks. On the contrary, Wikipedia has to work a lot to reach the level of Encarta and others. And of course we need more credible authors' and researchers' help, not your cheap propaganda.

    4. Re:Encarta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's published on the web these days: goooogle

    5. Re:Encarta by RedWizzard · · Score: 2, Funny
      Encarta isn't really 'fine' at all.
      And doesn't this publicity stunt just confirm that? "Encarta is so crap that Ken can hold it's entire contents in his head. Just try to stump him, go on!"
    6. Re:Encarta by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Cheap propaganda? Fuck yourself.

      I never said Wikipedia, which is clearly flawed, is a great encyclopedia. Precisely, I said that Wikipedia corrected the problem with Hamilton in a day.

      Now, fuck off, you have been repremanded.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  31. Embrace, Extend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So, would this be M$'s latest attempt at "embrace and extend?"


    -HJ

  32. This is a stupid story for Slashdot to run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And no amount of -1 will change that

  33. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot becomes mindless marketing tool for Encarta and Jeopardy.

  34. OT: The Amazing Larry Dunn by MBCook · · Score: 2, Funny
    OK, I just got this idea.

    Why not give Ken his own trivia show where people try to stump him? It's not that far from what MS will have him doing.

    So then I remember that episode of Keen Eddie (great show killed before it's time). The case in the episode involvs an EXTREEMLY famous man in England (fictional, of course) who had a trivia show where no one could stump him. One day he was stumped and then lost his show. He then became a bike messanger who forgot what he did with a package (this is the guy who remembers EVERYTHING). That's where he meets Keen Eddie.

    Still, coincidince? Will Ken's memory start to slip untill he is attacked by a group that is trying to rob a bank because he lost their package?

    If TV has taught us anything, yes!

    I warned it was off-topic.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:OT: The Amazing Larry Dunn by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      already been, have you ever seen win ben steins money?
      ken isnt as interesting/funny as ben stein though....

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    2. Re:OT: The Amazing Larry Dunn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're thinking of a show along the lines of Win Ben Stein's Money? where you compete against the host? but maybe Jennings isnt giving away his own money but MS's? I'd watch it.

    3. Re:OT: The Amazing Larry Dunn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironic that his final losing question was 'What is Fed-Ex?'

    4. Re:OT: The Amazing Larry Dunn by smyle · · Score: 1
      but maybe Jennings isnt giving away his own money...

      Read through the fine print at the end of the show. Ben never did "lose" any of his own money. He got paid what he didn't lose. If he kept his opponent from winning anything, he got paid the $5000 (IIRC). If the contestant won it all, Ben hosted the show for free.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    5. Re:OT: The Amazing Larry Dunn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that sounds a hell of a lot like giving away his money to me...

  35. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... when are the regurgitated Fark articles going to stop? I read about this and a few other stories today hours ago.

  36. What is it about Jeopardy!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone outside of the USA really give a shit about the game show Jeopardy!?

    1. Re:What is it about Jeopardy!? by e9th · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does anyone inside of the USA really give a shit about the opinion of anyone outside of the USA of the game show Jeopardy?

    2. Re:What is it about Jeopardy!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      werd

    3. Re:What is it about Jeopardy!? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Drop "of the game show Jeopardy" from that sentance, and I think you're really on to something. ;)

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:What is it about Jeopardy!? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      And that's the mentality that makes people from other countries park jet liners in your sky scrapers.

  37. Re:How to become rich... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought what sir said was funny.
    Even if redundant, his last remark was witty and well-timed.

  38. Looks like my theory will be tested by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does he know the answers, or merely the questions?

    1. Re:Looks like my theory will be tested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Microsoft is the question.

      No is the answer.;-)

    2. Re:Looks like my theory will be tested by archen · · Score: 1

      uh.... 42?

      Can I be his sidekick now?

  39. I wonder if Ken.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Believes in evolution" since he's a devout Mormon.

    1. Re:I wonder if Ken.. by sadler121 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually there are a many Mormon's (myself included) who believe in evolution...It's those fundamentalist Christians who are insistent on a literal interpretation of the Bible that can be the problem , not the Mormons (excluding Orrin Hatch he can goto Hell ;-) ).

    2. Re:I wonder if Ken.. by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      Actually there are a many Mormon's (myself included) who believe in evolution...It's those fundamentalist Christians who are insistent on a literal interpretation of the Bible that can be the problem , not the Mormons (excluding Orrin Hatch he can goto Hell ;-) ).

      Sure and lots of Catholics use birth control. All that says is that many people who are roped into a religion don't let it control their lives as much as the leaders of the religion would like it to (good for them! ). But the fact is the lords of the sacred underwear have never accepted evolution, so technically you're an heretic.

    3. Re:I wonder if Ken.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, you people try to tell us what we believe.

      Evolution dosen't mean there isn't a god, beliving in evolution and god is certainly possible. In fact it's not only possible but it's very plausable, it makes sense. Why would there be rules for the universe just so god could break them? Why couldn't god do amazing things within the laws of nature/physics/the universe? certainly you must know more than I do about my own religion so I guess I'm wrong and a heretic.

      It's funny how people can tell me what I believe and ignore me when I tell them differently. Most of us like to learn more and know more about everything, we want to understand our world and using science to do that dosen't make us heretics.

  40. Whatever.. by Coolnat2004 · · Score: 1

    Sure, this will likely help Microsoft to endorse their product, using a celebrity to make it seem better, when in reality it is worse or equal to others.

    But seriously, encyclopedia software is becoming outdated by online encyclopedias. It is no longer necessary to spend 20 minutes installing GB's of data, as you can just bring up a website, type in your term, and have your information right there -- and at no cost to you.

    1. Re:Whatever.. by malfunct · · Score: 1

      Though its helpful to have another encyclopedic or book source to double-check the facts that are on the web source you are quoting if only the generalities.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    2. Re:Whatever.. by dave420 · · Score: 1
      For you, fine. Not everyone has an internet connection capable of giving them what Encarta does.

      Also, Encarta has lots of stuff wikipedia doesn't have, owing to the fact it turns a profit, and has dedicated editors.

  41. Obligatory Jepordy answer by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    42

    See if he knows the question.

    1. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by lightdarkness · · Score: 1

      What is the meaning of life?

    2. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by Anusien · · Score: 2, Funny

      "How many roads must a man walk down before he is a man?" "I'm sorry, we were looking for, 'What is the answer to the question of Life, the University and Everything.' Mr. Beeblebrox, you remain in control of the board..."

    3. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh!!
      Hitch Hikers Guide

      Another epic journey into the universe!

    4. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by karlo_ubc · · Score: 2, Funny

      your IQ

      --
      kb
    5. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      What is the theoretical time to fall directly between two points (at a distance) on the earth's surface with no friction (in minutes)?

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    6. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *10

    7. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      What do you get if you multiply six by nine?

    8. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by corbettw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is the number of laws of cricket?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    9. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by isolation · · Score: 0

      I like your sig. He spoke to me once as well. I could try and describe it but most would just think I was crazy. Ephesians 6:12 sums it up.

      There is more to this world than meets the eyes and the spritual message the world tries to preach is not the truth.

      --
      Free Unix? Free Windows. http://www.reactos.com
    10. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean 54?

    11. Re:Obligatory Jepordy answer by phreakv6 · · Score: 2, Funny

      42

      See if he knows the question.


      yea..
      Q:what is your age ?

      Regards,
      Ken Jennings.

      --
      fifteen jugglers, five believers
  42. ya know by Heem · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Jennings is a progammer. I'm sure he reads slashdot. So - how about it Ken? Where are ya?

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:ya know by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely no reason to assume this. I have 5 friends and two brothers who are into engineering or computers, about half of them programming--and though most are aware of /., I'm the only one who reads it regularly.

    2. Re:ya know by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      A man of Ken Jenning's knowledge and trivia expertise could find a better way of spending his time than reading Slashdot.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    3. Re:ya know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like masturbating?

  43. One of us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speak for yourself. I'm not a member of a Utah based UFO cult.

  44. yeah, that's right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...Jennings is going to memorise every fact in the whole Encarta encyclopedia (if you'd call it that), just like he memorised all tho.. oh wait.. isn't this the guy who writes quiz question software for a living?

    Mhm, he's doing it as a way of demonstrating the value of the pursuit of knowledge - that's why he chose to promote a second-rate product bought out by a third-rate innovator which was barely of much educational value in the less-connected world 10 years ago, let alone today.

    Sigh, I can name so many people who are truly intelligent, truly encyclopedic in their knowledge, veritable polymaths, but this guy smells rotten from start to finish. And people lap him up. And all I have to do to question how this kind of large scale trickery can happen is to look at the result of a recent election.

    1. Re:yeah, that's right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up parent. What has become of us geeks when there is more hero-worshipping for some trivia quiz contestant and MS marketing stooge than the true mathematicians, scientists and engineers of our time? Even assuming he is totally genuine, is this what we look up to and want to become?

  45. Ken, answer this: by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    What is selling your soul?

    1. Re:Ken, answer this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is, becoming the spokesman for Microsoft's Encarta?

  46. How? Wikipedia? by parawing742 · · Score: 1

    And where exactly can use his fame in the open-source community? Wikipedia is our best work yet, but no serious scholar (such as Ken) would support it as a reference source. Furthermore, Wikimedia doesn't have the dollars MS does.

    1. Re:How? Wikipedia? by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      As a long time Wikipedian and quiz bowler, I think that quiz bowlers tend to make the best wikipedians (I know I'm biased, but...). Quiz bowlers tend to be knowledgable in a lot of areas, which is particularly helpful in a project like ours.

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    2. Re:How? Wikipedia? by damiam · · Score: 1

      No serious scholar would use Encarta (or any encyclopedia) as a reference source either.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  47. Too slow... by embezzled · · Score: 1

    Did anyone from Wikipedia even think of this? With firefox's publicity at its first release, Open Source has shown they can do this, but unless it gets on with the Cheese that appeals to most people, its going to stay as the 10%, and not the 90% that we'd like to think it deserves.

    1. Re:Too slow... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      and where would they get the money to pay him the millions M$ probably will?

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    2. Re:Too slow... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > and where would they get the money to pay him the millions M$ probably will?

      They could pretend to want to run an NYT article again...

      Wes

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  48. Ok Mr Jennings... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    What is the 19215'th article's 7'th paragraph, 9'th word and what was it reffering to?

    *recalls old 486 based ad&d games with page/paragraph/word anti-piracy.

    --
    1. Re:Ok Mr Jennings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "blinkdog"

  49. Unceccessary Steps. by NarrMaster · · Score: 1

    1) Get smart
    2) Get on Jeopardy
    3) Profit!

    Obvious.

    --
    That's right. All your base.
  50. Answers for fun by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 4, Funny
    What causes Pip in poultry?

    When chickens read Great Expectations.

    How old is Mae West?

    She's dead. But you're still welcome to come up and see her sometime.

    Who was the last British heavyweight champion of the world?

    Doesn't matter, the Irish still didn't recognize him.

    How far is Winnipeg from Montreal?

    It's too cold to tell now; ask again in summer.

    When did Florence Nightingale die?

    When her life ended.

    What is the height of the Empire State Building? What was the date of General Gordon's death?

    Is there a connection between the two?

    What are the Thirty-Nine Steps? Come on! Answer up! What are the Thirty-Nine Steps?

    Here ya go. Bring popcorn, it's great.

  51. So why did he do it? by marktaw.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why did Ken Jennings - multi millionaire - decide to hook up with Microsoft to promote a less-than stellar product. Is it...

    Because he really believes in it?

    Because he loves the celebrity and thinks spokesperson is the next logical step in his career?

    Or because Microsoft has agreed to pay all the taxes on his Jeopardy winnings?

    1. Re:So why did he do it? by freeweed · · Score: 1

      He's a "software engineer", and he's from Utah.

      Insert conspiracy theory here, and add a dash of my disdain for traditional soft eng practices.

      No, really. Is there anyone out there who thinks that stick figures help developers? :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:So why did he do it? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the new editions of encarta but i remember the old version for windows 95 beina amazing as a kid, i not only used it for research on almost every essay in elementary school I also would sit reading through articles and the links between articles for hours at a time.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:So why did he do it? by value_added · · Score: 1

      " Why did Ken Jennings - multi millionaire - decide to hook up with Microsoft to promote a less-than stellar product."

      Because they asked?

      The reason Microsoft is hawking the second-rate Encarta is because the folks at Britannica said no to the idea way back when.

  52. Slashdot Interview... by bje2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    KJ would make an excellend slashdot interview...someone shoulud work on that...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Slashdot Interview... by DocMax · · Score: 3, Funny

      If Slashdot gets that interview, will we have to submit our questions in the form of answers?

  53. Jennings knowledge isn't toally narrow by rtphokie · · Score: 2, Funny

    as is proven in this video. His mind wasn't always on trivia it seems.

    1. Re:Jennings knowledge isn't toally narrow by dicepackage · · Score: 1

      He really should have gotten credit as that was a correct response.

    2. Re:Jennings knowledge isn't toally narrow by rzebram · · Score: 1

      And that is why I'm not on Jeapordy... I got that one wrong and had to google to see what "rake" really meant. Nuts. Yarrr... *pages Dr. Freud*

    3. Re:Jennings knowledge isn't toally narrow by tangledweb · · Score: 1

      He really should have gotten credit as that was a correct response.

      Errrr... No. In what way is a hoe an immoral pleasure seeker?

      I assume you mean ho as in whore and maybe you hang out with more whores than I do, but my understanding is that they are not in it for the pleasure. I believe that money has a lot more to do with it. Sorry if you have been lied to.

  54. Wait!.. Wait!.. I know this one.. by digital.prion · · Score: 1

    What is a .. Bounced Check?

    --
    Smile.
  55. P.S. by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know, the original poster was just quoting from the Thirty-Nine Steps, but I wanted to have fun anyway. And yes, I meant my last line wholeheartedly: it's a great movie. But no, even after watching it you won't know what causes Pip in poultry, sadly.

    1. Re:P.S. by xmedar · · Score: 1

      Glad someone was paying attention, and the answer

      Is there a connection between the two?

      Is lack of Preview on my part with the formatting, and for those who don't get the joke, Mr Memory meets an untimely demise before answering the last question.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  56. Re:Encarta... For your kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some parents probably want their kids to have a computer, and be able to learn on it.

    But most kids probably shouldn't have full internet access until they are a bit older.

    So.. you can setup http proxies and allow wikipedia access, etc.

    Or you can go the simple non-techie route, and unplug the internet and drop in an Encarta cd.

  57. Clippy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Microsoft tapped Jeopardy! king Ken Jennings
    I didn't RTFA but I do hope that he is the replacement for Clippy, then maybe I can actually get some work done. Although would it mean that I would have to type the answer in, and he would give me the question. On second thought maybe this isn't such a great idea.
  58. Re:Submitter, you're a RAT BASTARD!!! by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    nevermind This Post on the 30th of Nov.

  59. I'd think he'd work for SCO by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 0

    I mean, they're both from Utah.

  60. Actually you have it backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Microsoft is the answer,

    "Are you crazy!?!?!?"

    is the question.

  61. Immorality Reigns Supreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I were this 'Mr.' Jennings I would very vocally and publically decline everything from M$. I have morals and will fight towards the destruction of that vile organization.

    "I would rather have a crown in heaven than to serve in Hell" comes to mind.

  62. Fails Marketing 101 by droleary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Jennings will embark on a nationwide media tour called 'Quiz the Whiz' that challenges news desks to stump the human encyclopedia with questions from Microsoft's Encarta Reference Library Premium 2005.

    So the media campaign is to draw attention to what, exactly? If you stump Jennings, he is knocked down a peg and you demonstrate that he was more lucky than anything in getting asked question on Jeopardy he just happened to know. Why bother with any specific education/product if success comes only from a coin flip? If you don't stump him, Encarta is knocked down a peg because he shows that he has more knowledge than what they're trying to sell and that you should probably buy another product if you want a more comprehensive reference. There is no win-win here; someone at MS should be fired for thinking up this gimmick.

    1. Re:Fails Marketing 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't stump him, Encarta is knocked down a peg because he shows that he has more knowledge than what they're trying to sell and that you should probably buy another product if you want a more comprehensive reference.

      So... I should, like, try to buy Ken as my computer encyclopedia?

      I don't know... how much memory does he take up on the computer? He's married as well... do I have to have room for his wife, too?

    2. Re:Fails Marketing 101 by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1
      Buddy, they're trying to create a *factoid buzz*!!!

      /trying to think like a marketer

    3. Re:Fails Marketing 101 by droleary · · Score: 1

      So... I should, like, try to buy Ken as my computer encyclopedia?

      If you can beat the offer MS made him, sure! More to the point, you should buy whatever Ken himself bought, not what he is hawking. At least when kids were told to "Be Like Mike", they were supposed to actually buy the kind of shoes that Jordan wore. Same thing for the Subway ads with that Jared guy. This thing Ken's doing just looks bad, even if it does add a few hundred grand to the millions he fully earned. It's like those hot bods in ads for workout machines or supplements, who never used the product at all to achieve their results. Par for the course with MS, I suppose; hate to see Ken's reputation tarnished that way, though.

    4. Re:Fails Marketing 101 by samsonov · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the horribly selling game "(take a) whizz on the whiz" which will rank right up there with the encarta product itself imho.

      --
      "You killed my yogurt!" --Fred Fredburger
  63. At least... by servognome · · Score: 1

    he gained his C-level fame for winning at a difficult quiz show.
    Unlike others who got their fame from losing 500lbs eating mediocre hoagies, singing so horribly everybody couldn't help but laugh, or crashing at the guest house of a murderous football player

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  64. Seinfeld Endorsement Episode by windside · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did anyone else find it just a little bit weird that Jennings lost on the same night as Jeopardy aired the episode in which every category was somehow related to Seinfeld, not to mention the final category that was actually questions (answers?) about Seinfeld, read by actors fromSeinfeld...

    The tie-in was a plug for the recently-released DVDs (one week before the airing of the episode, to be exact). Most Jeopardy episodes don't contain this kind of plug... in fact not a single one comes to mind in recent history. Doesn't anyone else find this the least bit weird?

    --
    ...Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
    Churchill
    1. Re:Seinfeld Endorsement Episode by rfarma5 · · Score: 1
      I support this theory. Now I haven't seen every episode of jeopardy, and the format does seem like it's getting looser with more pop-culture questions, but having a whole round with all Seinfeld questions was a little bit suspcious.

      "Somehow" it leaked out that it would be KJ's final jeopardy (pun intended) and somehow that final jeopardy plugs the Seinfeld DVDs during the whole episode. Funny that one of the most-watched Jeopardy episodes (don't know if this is confirmed or not) is also the one where they plug something the whole time...

      BTW I enjoyed watching KJ and I enjoy Seinfeld, I just think it was pretty damn suspicious.

    2. Re:Seinfeld Endorsement Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the Seinfeld endorsement-fest was crucial to KenJen's loss, though not for any grand conspiratorial reason. The relevance of the Seinfeld video questions is far simpler:

      For the past 74 programs, Ken had mastered the timing of the buzzer. He could pretty much be the first to buzz in anytime he wanted to be.

      However, video-insert questions have a different pacing than regular questions, as far as the timing of the end of the video and the first moment it's OK to buzz in.

      So in a round that was nothing but video-insert questions, Ken lost his usual buzzer-advantage, and this laid the groundwork for his eventual loss.

    3. Re:Seinfeld Endorsement Episode by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      Actually I posted about this on the last Ken Jennings article.

      Remember the Final Jeopardy question was "H & R Block". That's kind of a mini-advertisement.

      Also, the next episode, a category was called "My doctor recommends". The "answers" for this category were always just the PR releases for a medication, something like "This pill relieves indegestion for up to 24 hours".

      I haven't watched Jeopardy in years, but I don't remember their being some many questions where the answer was a brand name or product name or company.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    4. Re:Seinfeld Endorsement Episode by crumley · · Score: 1
      Its not really that weird. Lately they seem to have that kind of advert/category about once a week. I remember a Stars Wars category from when the original series came out on DVD, in particular. I don't like that type of category, but I don't think that its all that odd.

      Related category titles (sometimes for both rounds) also seem fairly common these days.

      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    5. Re:Seinfeld Endorsement Episode by rianpie · · Score: 1

      I don't think Ken missing one category worth of questions in the first round is what did him in...missing BOTH Double Jeopardy questions in round 2 is what made him catchable. He did get at least one of the Seinfeld questions right, too (the cashmere sweater one, if memory serves)

      And themes/ads are not that uncommon. There was just a recent episode where the questions were about the "Ben Franklin" special on the History Channel.

    6. Re:Seinfeld Endorsement Episode by fatgraham · · Score: 1

      what is irony?

    7. Re:Seinfeld Endorsement Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware of course that they didn't know it was the one he would miss until it had already been finished, after the advertestions had been asked right?

  65. More Msft Mormon connection? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I know the guy happens to be a Mormon, and a software engineer.

  66. what a loser! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of guy sits around all day reading encyclopedias and regurgitating useless facts?

    Now if you'll excuse me, I have to read the iptables man page. I can't wait to see what new flags they've added!!

  67. You misspelled "misinformation", by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nitwit.

  68. Strange by Azathfeld · · Score: 5, Funny

    I never thought I'd hear of a man making millions of dollars and then deciding to become an encyclopedia salesman.

  69. Anyone know what Encarta Atlas is like? by redcliffe · · Score: 1

    I'm always looking for resources for finding locations, and the web isn't that great for Atlas style maps. Anyone know if the atlas in encarta is any good? Thanks,

    David

    1. Re:Anyone know what Encarta Atlas is like? by generationxyu · · Score: 1

      Someone in a previous comment stated that Encarta Atlas is very good, and that he knows of people buying Encarta solely for the Atlas.

      --
      I mod down pyramid schemes in sigs.
  70. Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco,

    Thanks for the PR!

    Love Bill.

  71. What are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Natalie Portman and Hot Grits? :p

    (for the n00bs..)

  72. What's he going to do first? by blair1q · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Will he go over to the dark side, or will he spend the next 10 years fixing all the stupid errors in the Encarta encyclopedia?

    1. Re:What's he going to do first? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      COWARDS!

      If you disagree with me, show your sorry faces.

      Don't hide behind your feckless moderator points, you Gatesian tools.

  73. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. I would've hire Kim Peek by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 1
    Now there is a human encyclopedia!

    He would just need to read the encylopedia once, then he would perfect. He probably would not even need to read most of it.

    Dream jeopardy: Kim Peek vs. Ken Jennings. Kim would have to hope that his specialty areas came up.

  76. (6 x 9 == 42) by Stealth+Potato · · Score: 1
    Try it in base-13.

    And yes, I know Douglas Adams denied writing any jokes in base-13. Maybe he didn't, but I'm still not sure it's a coincidence. :-)

  77. Ben Stein, anyone? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

    It's like "Win Ben Stein's Money" all over again, only Ken Jennings hasn't actually been an economist for decades like Stein has... he just kicked serious ass on Jeopardy.

    Come to think of it, I'd love to see Pat Sajak host Jeopardy for a night (or maybe a full week!) while Alex Trebek, Ken Jennings, and Ben Stein hold the buzzers and play Jeopardy! Someone forward this idea to Sony Pictures...

    1. Re:Ben Stein, anyone? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      The only difference is that Ben Stein didnt have the game rigged for him to generate 1)free publicity for 2 sponsors at the end of the planned 75 game stunt and 2)ratings. At least the $64000 Dollar question was more honest, and it was rigged as well.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    2. Re:Ben Stein, anyone? by Radar|TGS · · Score: 1

      Lay off Trebeck. You wouldn't have known that if you didn't have that card in front of you!

    3. Re:Ben Stein, anyone? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that AT would be smoked, and the Ken/Ben show result would hinge on which categories were selected.

      Aside: I've never watched Ken, I'm just guessing by the hype. In fact, I don't think I've ever watched an entire Jeopardy episode. I watched BSM for a season or so until Jimmy Kimmel left. His departure was when the sow jumped the shark, imho. Straight-man/Funny-man=good Straight-man/Chick-with-big-tits=not so good.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Ben Stein, anyone? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      After reading Jeopardy clues for two decades, I think Alex has demonstrated clearly that he has an interest in academic pursuits, and I think he's heard various details about so many subjects that he knows them through and through just because of that. He goes through more academic trivia on a first-hand basis than just about any Canadian I've ever heard of.

  78. Does anyone have a video clip from Jeopardy... by antdude · · Score: 1

    on when Ken lost? I heard the audience reacted to the loss.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  79. Now it can be revealed by schnitzi · · Score: 1

    Ken Jennings was that annoying kid from the old Encyclopedia Britannica commercials.

    --



    I object to that article, and to the next reply.
  80. Atlas by harmonica · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Encarta has the best computer atlas I've ever seen, though. That's the most valuable part, and I've heard of people buying Encarta just for that atlas.

    1. Re:Atlas by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Is the atlas actually on the media or do you have to connect to the website to access it?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    2. Re:Atlas by harmonica · · Score: 1

      It's part of the program, no net access necessary. Being able to quickly zoom in and out interactively is part of the fun. No website can really imitate that. But I wouldn't recommend it if it wasn't for the data included. It not only works for the US and Europe but for quite a few "exotic" (beware, Western ignorance at work :)) countries.

  81. vulnerabilization of the Wealth of Humans by SaberTaylor · · Score: 1

    Our empire(s) are effectively only 300 years old, depending on how you look at them. Virtually all human art has been centralized in museums.

    +0 funny.

    --
    If you need text styles to communicate then you don't have a message.
  82. Orgasmo by rasz · · Score: 1

    Utah ? Mormon ? Talented ? ... ORGASMO !

  83. Just like Charles Van Doren. by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 1

    Clean-cut handsome quiz show champion goes on from record-breaking run to work for an encyclopedia company.

    Does anyone else think this reeks?

    (And for those who haven't heard of van Doren - look him up on Google, or watch the movie on the 50s quiz show scandals that Showtime is (by coincidence?) running this month.)

    1. Re:Just like Charles Van Doren. by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Unlike Charles Van Doren, though, Ken Jennings didn't cheat and that is something to be proud of.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  84. I thought he was smarter than that by slapout · · Score: 1

    Wow. He's not as smart as I thought he was :-)

    I remember when electronic encyclopedia's first came out. They actually had a lot of in depth articles. Then "multi-media" hit. Suddenly they had all those neato pictures and videos. But the articles suffered because of it. Instead of articles that told you a lot about a subject, you had ones that just skimmed it and were shorter than a newspaper column.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  85. Eliminating words from the Dictionary by Torontoman · · Score: 1

    This is somewhat related - I hear that Oxford is removing the word 'gullable' from the 2006 version of the Dictionary due out in Jan.

    1. Re:Eliminating words from the Dictionary by downset · · Score: 1

      Removing 'gullable' from the dictionary wouldn't be such a bad idea, due to the fact that it shouldn't be in there at all. You don't mean gullible do you?

  86. Same Stuff from Microsoft. by hacker · · Score: 1
    Why am I not surprised that Microsoft is (once again) trying to cash in on the successes of others, for their own profit?

    They haven't invented a single unique thing out of Redmond or had a single independent thought in at least a decade now. They simply wait for someone to do something they can't do themselves, and they either buy them out, claim it as their own invention through patents filed after-the-fact, or they liquidate the originator into submission.

    SSSM (Same Shit, Same Microsoft) here.

    1. Re:Same Stuff from Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You mean to tell me a commercial organization is using a celebrity spokesperson to improve the image of their product and make profit? For shame, Microsoft! Of course, this is OK for Nike, Reebok, Revlon, just about any other company on the planet.

      The real "Same Shit" here is the Karma bonus you will inevitably get for posting an anti-Microsoft comment at Slashdot.

  87. Jennings likes Encarta ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2004/d ec04/12-06KenJennings.asp

  88. It is very important to note by Master_T · · Score: 1

    I am a Mormon too. It turns out that Mormons are the only religious group where as education increases so does religiousity. I not only believe in evolution but find it to be in line doctrinally with my church. Just because we are Christian certainly does not prevent us from seeking erudition and scientific knowledge

  89. You're so vain . . . by therblig · · Score: 1
    In fact, out of curiosity I searched for myself once and turned up all sorts of erroneous information," he said. "One seemingly reputable and authoritative page even had my name wrong!"

    It seems Carly Simon had a song about Mr. Jennings . . .

    --

    I struggled for days and days and all I got was this lousy sig.