Slashdot Mirror


Space Station Crew Forced to Cut Calories

gollum123 writes "CNN and others are reporting that food is running so low aboard the international space station that both the crew members have been asked to cut their calories, at least until a Russian supply ship arrives in a little over two weeks. The situation is so bad that if a Russian cargo vessel scheduled to arrive on Dec. 25 has a mishap or is significantly delayed, the astronauts, one American and one Russian, will have to abandon the station and return home months ahead of schedule. An independent team is looking into how the food inventory ended up being tracked so poorly and how it can be improved in the future."

434 comments

  1. Great by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

    I think that would scare the hell out of me.

    ~D

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Less weight and less gravity means they will be more likely to be thrown further away from earth.


      Is this true? While less weight on the Spacestation means that it would create less gravity, wouldn't this be offset by the reduction in force created as it moved with the less weight?
    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol what?

    3. Re:Great by krymsin01 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dumbass, just reverse the polarity.

      --
      stuff
    4. Re:Great by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Orbits of small mases about large masses are only determined by the mass of the central body.

      That's a fundamental result of Einstein's strong equivalence principle.

      The mass can affect the orbit if the orbit is low enough to interact with the atmosphere.

    5. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why?

    6. Re:Great by thhamm · · Score: 3, Funny


      just change the gravitational constant of the universe!

    7. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      polarity of what? food ingestion system?

    8. Re:Great by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Is this true? While less weight on the Spacestation means that it would create less gravity, wouldn't this be offset by the reduction in force created as it moved with the less weight?
      I wouldn't have expressed it in quite those terms, but you're about right.

      The radius of the orbit of a satellite depends on the velocity (I think r is proportional to 1/v^2, but it's a frightening length of time since I studied physics)

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Great by Eric604 · · Score: 1

      hmm lets see:

      Fc= m*v^2 / r

      so less mass would mean less centripetal force, so the station would indeed lower a bit.

      (IAAPS)

    10. Re:Great by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

      "Dumbass, just reverse the polarity."

      I think they have a much more hygenic way of dealing with poo up there.

    11. Re:Great by Eric604 · · Score: 1

      that is when the other effects are ignored.

      Fg= mG
      Fc= mv^2/r

      since Fc and force of gravity should be in balance (orbit):

      mG=mv^/r => r=mv^2/mG => r=v^2/G

      As you see, r is independent of mass (i could be wrong :)

    12. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can do, just eliminate all fat geeks.

    13. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't be such a fucking geek.
      Get out of your basement.
      Don't ask why! Just say "why not!"

    14. Re:Great by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      > I'm worried about the astronauts losing so much weight. With the weight lost, it will change the trajectory of their orbit. Will it change it enough to be a substantial worry? We don't know this yet. Less weight and less gravity means they will be more likely to be thrown further away from earth.

      Oh. My. God. Please tell me you're kidding. If you think that the weight of the astronauts and the food make up even a tiny fraction of an appreciable percentage of the weight of the station as a whole, you need to do a little reading. Their weight loss wouldn't throw the station's orbit off if they jumped out the airlock, much less lost a few love handles.

      Virg

    15. Re:Great by Joey7F · · Score: 1
      Oh. My. God. Please tell me you're kidding. If you think that the weight of the astronauts and the food make up even a tiny fraction of an appreciable percentage of the weight of the station as a whole, you need to do a little reading. Their weight loss wouldn't throw the station's orbit off if they jumped out the airlock, much less lost a few love handles.

      Virg


      I believe you mean that they make up a small percentage of the station's mass as a whole

      FWIW, I think the grandparent was joking

      --Joey
    16. Re:Great by homerules · · Score: 1

      It happened on southpark

    17. Re:Great by mwood · · Score: 1

      Actually I find it kind of reassuring, in a way. We've seen on several occasions, of late, that the big danger in space is not BEMs, cosmic rays, catastrophic equipment failure, novel physical or mental maladies, or unanticipated technical problems; it's that nobody was assigned to check something and so nobody checked it. We have centuries of management science to help us with problems like that.

    18. Re:Great by Angafirith · · Score: 1

      I think you're correct on this. I have a question, though... did you just disagree with yourself?

      --
      "It is better to risk sparing a guilty person than to condemn an innocent one." - Voltaire
    19. Re:Great by Eric604 · · Score: 1
      No, my first post was a reply to the "offset" part in:
      wouldn't this be offset by the reduction in force created as it moved with the less weight

      The second post is also taking into account the gravity, which counteracts the upwards force (the "offset")

    20. Re:Great by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 2, Funny
      just change the gravitational constant of the universe!

      No, just change from English to metric. That ought to do it.

    21. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      We have centuries of management science to help us with problems like that.

      Oh my god! Space exploration is doomed!

    22. Re:Great by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Not really. They're being asked to cut from a 3000 Calorie diet.

      That's not going from "lots of food" to "no food", it's more like drinking a glass less of milk every day. They're not going to die.

      realistically, a 2000 Calorie diet is perfectly healthy; they probably were eating too much to begin with.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    23. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weight and mass are 2 different things.

    24. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't be such a fucking geek.
      Get out of your basement.
      Don't ask why! Just say "why not!"


      Begin Translation:

      Fuck you asshole.
      Suck my cock, you dick lick.
      Quit masturbading and go get laid.
      I'm a homosexual.

      End of Translation.

      You're welcome.

  2. Space McDonalds? by grazzy · · Score: 3, Funny

    .. where are they when you need them?

    1. Re:Space McDonalds? by Blender · · Score: 1

      You mean the Restaurant at the End of the Universe I presume.

    2. Re:Space McDonalds? by CortoMaltese · · Score: 2, Funny
      And here I thought you could order pizza, delivered, anywhere. You know, free delivery if you order two or more pizzas.

      "Hi, this is Leroy Chiao... I'd like to order two Quattro Stagiones, delivered, please... and put in some extra oregano, we're running low on that... International Space Station, in the orbit... yes, that's the one. Please hurry. Thanks, bye."

    3. Re:Space McDonalds? by skaffen42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm pretty sure midnight snacking is what caused this problem. I mean, the ISS goes around the earth quite a few times every 24 hours, and the station probably experiences night every time. Now astronauts are by definition geeks, and I have never met a true geek who can keep themselves from heading to the snack cupboard at around midnight. Just think about how much snacking they end up doing and it is amazing their food supplies lasted as long as it did.

      As for McDonalds in space... no, no, no. That is how it starts. First the midnight snacking, then you start doing late night runs to McDonalds, then you have to buy the bigger space suit.

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    4. Re:Space McDonalds? by rf0 · · Score: 1

      Next to Starbucks

      Rus

    5. Re:Space McDonalds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its been, what, 18 years? Where's Rudy's?
      Hint: http://imdb.com/title/tt0091993/

  3. wait...wait..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /me waits for:

    In soviet russia food eats you

    1. Re:wait...wait..... by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0

      ... that or a Soylent Green one, yes.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  4. Weightless Weight Loss by axonal · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, talk about strict dieting. Makes me wish I was up there, I know I could loose some of the weight gained from endless amounts of caffeinated drinks...

    1. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You could also lose that weight by stopping the caffeinated drinks and getting some excercise. As a side benefit, you might get some sunlight as well.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by krymsin01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could also have lots of sex... oh wait..

      --
      stuff
    3. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by cL0h · · Score: 1

      WTF?!??!?
      Yeah I'd jump at the chance to go to space so I could stop drinking caffeinated drinks.
      The weightlessness, seeing earth's curvature, new frontier stuff would be interesting too.
      It's a pity one has to pass a physical to get that chance in the first place. Otherwise I'd be thin

      --
      cL0h
    4. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by ladybugfi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Their daily intake is 3000 calories, before the cut that is.

      Wow! What on earth [sic!] are they doing up there? I'd think they would not require that much food since they don't have to deal with gravity.

      Inquiring minds want to know...

    5. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are in a weightless enviroment - i think it's MASS that they'll be losing.

      Didn't you do physics at school?

    6. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by bsartist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What on earth [sic!] are they doing up there?

      Exercising like mad. They have to - if they don't they lose muscle mass because of the lack of gravity. The Soviets learned this the hard way. When the cosmonauts who went on the first long-term missions returned to earth, they were practically crippled and had to go through months of rehab.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    7. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered.. why DOES muscle destroy itself when it's not used much?

      -Z

    8. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      having extra muscle requires a lot more calories to support than fat (or than nothing) even when it's doing nothing. for most of our evolution food was scare and getting rid of that metabolic cost when it wasn't being used was beneficial and a good thing.

    9. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, when there is zero gravity, there is no need to maintain muscle to fight gravity.

      So if no need to maintain the muscle, muscle mass will decrease.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    10. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by LandGator · · Score: 1

      1) It's bloody cold on the ISS. Extra calories keep them warm.

      2) They also have to exercise like demons to minimize the loss of bone and muscle mass. Exercise burns calories.

      3) Food is comfort. When you are stuck in a smelly cold can with someone from another culture, wearing the same clothes for a month, sponge bathing only weekly, and on a work schedule which would boggle 99% of us here, damn right they deserve something enjoyable.

      --
      There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
    11. Re:Weightless Weight Loss by lew3004 · · Score: 1

      Thanks...comic book guy.

      --
      I still can't get the screen shots of Castle Wolfenstein for the Apple IIe out of my head.
  5. Christmas by pklong · · Score: 5, Funny

    "a Russian cargo vessel scheduled to arrive on Dec. 25". So they won't me missing out on the brussel sprouts this year. Poor sods :)

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

    1. Re:Christmas by flumps · · Score: 1

      .. well at least they could recycle the methane produced for their fuel cells eh?

      In such a confined space it will probably be unbearable on boxing day morning until the filters kick in ;)

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    2. Re:Christmas by rf0 · · Score: 1

      Just eat the ISS. They have the same test

      Rus

    3. Re:Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russian Christmas is in early January. Something to do with the Julian vs. Gregorian calendar I believe.

    4. Re:Christmas by isil · · Score: 1

      Orthodox Christian Christmas is generally celebrated January 7th, but its entirely up to the churches. Christ most likely wasn't born December 25th and the choice of December 25th is generally regarded as something the RCC selected to try to compete with the pagan rights surrounding the winter solstace.

  6. Simple explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    [...] looking into how the food inventory ended up being tracked so poorly [...]

    Hey, even astronauts can get the munchies!

    1. Re:Simple explanation by campaign_bug · · Score: 1

      Are the replicators offline again? Tsk...

    2. Re:Simple explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its those package markings. 12 servings my ass.

  7. Most of the astronauts are American, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is probably a good choice for them then.

  8. Starbucks? by cybertears · · Score: 1

    What about the Starbucks they built on the moon I'm always hearing about?

    1. Re:Starbucks? by b0r0din · · Score: 1

      That was Dr. Evil's lair. You know, with the big 'laser'? Just because they own Starbucks doesn't mean they serve coffee on it. Although they should.

      Throw me a frickin bone here, people.

    2. Re:Starbucks? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      They do serve coffee on it. Man, when's the last time you saw that movie?

  9. Possible Culprits: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Possible Culprits:
    - Lab Mice (Think Pinky & the Brain)
    - Unofficial parties to celebrate holidays (pass me more beer from back there will ya?)
    - Aliens (Hmm... we need to analyse those things humans eat!) /me ducks before being kicked out!

  10. Its those fat americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    see its true

  11. Only 2 astronauts by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is the team usually this small or have most of them buggered off for Christmas?

    --
    Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    1. Re:Only 2 astronauts by johannesg · · Score: 1
      The team size is directly related to the capacity of the rescue pod, which is a Soyuz craft docked to the station. Originally NASA was supposed to build a large Crew Rescue Vehicle which could hold up to seven people, but budget cuts killed that project. As a result the space station crew is now limited to no more than three.

      Having said that, I'm not entirely certain why they chose to work with just two people.

    2. Re:Only 2 astronauts by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 3, Informative

      the Soyuz can hold 3, which has traditionally been the crew size on the station. until shuttle flights resume, the crew size will be limited to 2, since the Russians can't crank out enough Soyuz and Progress (supply) missions to support a crew of 3.

  12. Space Takeout?? and From the Article by hajihill · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    "estimated there is enough food to last seven to 14 days beyond Christmas Day, after which there will be nothing left."

    "they were put on restricted diets in hopes of trimming 5 percent to 10 percent of their daily intake of 3,000 calories."

    "NASA and the Russian Space Agency were stunned to learn last week that the astronauts had begun digging into the 45-day food reserve -- which exists to protect against a delayed supply shipment -- in mid-November."

    "The station's water supply is not nearly as dire and the two men have been encouraged to drink as much as they want."

    And this is great: "Extra food and water has been packed into the supply ship that is scheduled to blast off from Kazakhstan on December 23, including some Asian delicacies -- dim sum dumplings for Chiao, a first-generation Chinese-American, and fried rice for Sharipov, who was born in what is now Kyrgyzstan in central Asia."

    Space take-out. Who knew? Evidently it isn't guaranteed to be warm and fresh in thirty minutes or less...??? Looks like consumer space travel has one more bump to overcome.

    --
    Of blankness, I know nothing.
    1. Re:Space Takeout?? and From the Article by BakedBeans · · Score: 1

      Hm.. these guys are eating 3,000 calories a day?? That's actually a lot of food intake for what are fit people in a minimal-effort environment.

      Dropping that to 2,500 would be achievable if done in steps; say 100 calories a day.

    2. Re:Space Takeout?? and From the Article by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Well I guess it's a bit boring up there, it's not like they can go watch a movie :)

    3. Re:Space Takeout?? and From the Article by Shinobi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, 3000 calories sounds pretty normal for very fit people in somewhat difficult conditions. Remember, the average male(on a global scale, not just the industrialized, lazy parts of the world) requires around 2300 kcal just to get by without the body deteriorating. Taking only myself into comparison, when I'm fully active with my normal training and stuff, I burn around 4000 kcal/day, just to keep up with the energy need, and I can go higher when pushing myself. Worst off are elite cyclists, elite soldiers in the field etc, who can require up to 12000 kcal/day if they want to avoid bodily deterioration.

    4. Re:Space Takeout?? and From the Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Space is anything but a minimal effort envrionment. It's tough to get around in zero G, and requires a lot of full body movement to get from one place to another, instead of just your legs.

    5. Re:Space Takeout?? and From the Article by FlopEJoe · · Score: 2, Funny
      "...including some Asian delicacies -- dim sum dumplings..."

      Wrong, wrong, wrong. Don't they realize if they eat Chinese take out they'll just be hungry in a half hour? It's not rocket science, people!

    6. Re:Space Takeout?? and From the Article by tjstork · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere once that the original arctic explorers had to consume 10-15kcal/day simply because it was so cold that their bodies were on overdrive to stay warm.

      --
      This is my sig.
    7. Re:Space Takeout?? and From the Article by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      I definitely see no reason to not believe that. I've done arctic survival training, as well as living in sub-arctic regions for a while during winters. Want to know what the next biggest cause of death is, next to direct damage from exposure to cold? It's dehydration.

    8. Re:Space Takeout?? and From the Article by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I have a problem with your post:

      "I definitely see"
      Ok you agree,

      "no reason to"
      Wait. . . no you dont agree,

      "not believe that."
      Oh yeah you do agree afterall.

      My head hurts. . . :-)
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  13. Possible explainations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Normal menu: gruel, dried-out bread, spam
    Reserve supply menu: caviar, salmon, steak, black forest gateau

    2. "Alien"-style aliens. They have to eat for two as pregnant women say.

    3. Food supplies were injected with water to make them weigh more. Water evaporated into space.

    4. Astronouts have been playing target practice firing spuds at Rupert Murdoch's communications sattelites

    5. Some relativistic thing

    6. Some quantum thing

    7. Something to do with SCO

    1. Re:Possible explainations by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      8. The secret experiment with the transporter beam didn't work exactly as planned. Instead of beaming away their waste, they beamed away their food. Well, actually that's good luck, because the aliens at the place they beamed the stuff to (of course they didn't know about those aliens due to the alien's perfect stealth technology) will now be much more friendly than if they had recieved the waste.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  14. they have already eaten the others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    posting anonymously due to grossness.

    1. Re:they have already eaten the others by kfg · · Score: 1

      Hey, why should rugby players have all the fun?

      KFG

  15. Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by caluml · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before people start mocking Russians, and their food situation, just let me say that I ate more of, and better quality food when I was in Russia than I usually do in the UK. Salo though, is horrible stuff.

    1. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by djtrialprice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and better quality food when I was in Russia than I usually do in the UK

      You do know that we Brits are the culinary laughing stock of the world? That's why I'm glad to be Scottish. Who else would think of the deep fried mars bar / deep fried pizza?

    2. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ate more of, and better quality food when I was in Russia than I usually do in the UK.

      Because most of us don't live in UK, we don't compare the food in Russia to food in UK. Russian food can be bad, but the British is even worse.

    3. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by JollyFinn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They teach French in your schools. And this is the reason why.

      --
      Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
    4. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called pricing. The money that gets you top quality beef in Russia gets you American fast food crap over here.

      --
      Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    5. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Mariukenas · · Score: 1

      Salo is supposed to be eaten with onions/pickles and vodka. Non-fried potatoes are horrible too :)

    6. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by teg · · Score: 1

      You do know that we Brits are the culinary laughing stock of the world?

      For a reason. There's happily a good amount of foreign restaurants there, though :)

      That's why I'm glad to be Scottish. Who else would think of the deep fried mars bar / deep fried pizza?

      The southern part of US... deep friend onions, bananas, mars bars, twinkies, turkeys.... anything.

    7. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      That's why I'm glad to be Scottish. Who else would think of the deep fried mars bar / deep fried pizza?

      Americans? (Fried Twinkies, Fried applies, Fried <insert whatever you can think of here>

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    8. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by ceeam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Untrue. I live in Russia now and when comparing food prices with a friend of mine living in Washington, DC suburbs... well, maybe at average they are 70% of US's. But _quality_ food in Russia, generally, costs the same or more compared with the same quality food in US. Meat, in particular, is _very_ expensive in Russia. 10 years ago you would be right, though.

    9. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by shufler · · Score: 1

      The southern part of US... deep friend onions, bananas, mars bars, twinkies, turkeys.... anything

      Don't forget ice cream. Deep fried ice cream.

    10. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      You do know that we Brits are the culinary laughing stock of the world?

      No idea why. Boiled cabbage has been off the menu just about everywhere since the 1950's. The reputation comes from the french, who think they're superior because ... well, because they're french.

      We have some fine tradtional food, such as roast beef, Full English Breakfast, Cotage pie, some of the worlds best cheeses, crumpets, and Chicken Tikka Masala.

      Granted, we have a lot of people who wouldn't know good food if you hit them with it, but I refuse to beleive Britain is unique in that respect. If you want good food, its available and easy to find.

    11. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention meat pies. I'm serious, that's good eats.

    12. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hair pie is better. Just ask Bugar.

    13. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by djtrialprice · · Score: 1

      I know we're not that bad. It's just that I was listening to Bill Hicks a couple of days ago:

      Bill: This food sucks!
      [gunshot]
      Bill: You don't boil pizza!
      [gunshot]
      Englishman: That's the way we eat here.

      http://www.fountain.btinternet.co.uk/jokes/billhic ks_relentless.html

    14. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by DisprinDirect · · Score: 1

      Odd isn't it that, when the US Space Shuttle system fails, and the International Space Station suffers as a result, its seen as a failure in "THEIR SPACE STATION"????

    15. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      English food is pretty scarey. The English don't believe in refrigerating anything, not just their beer. I've seen a display of prawn (shrimp) sandwichs in a non refrigerated display case with an expiration date of two weeks out. I think the expiration date of anyone who ate one of those sandwiches would be sooner than that.

      The Scots don't fare any better. I've had breakfast in a Scottish b&b where the sausage was almost transparent it had so much fat content. Pelucid was the term that came to mind at the time.

    16. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The English don't believe in refrigerating anything, not just their beer.

      Chilling British beer would hide the flavour. This is why very cold beer is essential in the US.

      I've seen a display of prawn (shrimp) sandwichs in a non refrigerated display case with an expiration date of two weeks out.

      I've lived there for 25 years and I never have. doing so would breach our very strict food health laws.

      The Scots don't fare any better. I've had breakfast in a Scottish b&b where the sausage was almost transparent it had so much fat content.

      Anyone who has a sausage in s scottish B&B is just asking for trouble. But you need the calories to keep out the cold, and give you the energy needed fo rcaber tossing.

    17. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pellucid, not pelucid

    18. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      Salo is supposed to be eaten with onions/pickles and vodka. Non-fried potatoes are horrible too :)

      When you talk about something being horrible to eat named "salo," only one thing comes to mind...

    19. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      You do know that we Brits are the culinary laughing stock of the world?

      No, but it's an unfair criticism. I've heard it a few times here on /. from Americans, probably who have been to London and eaten in some tourist rip-off joint.

      Sure, if you go to your local crappo chain pub then you'll get overpriced microwaved crap. Find a real good pub in the country and you'll get some really fine food that's up there with the best in the world.

    20. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      So, tell me, what do you know of British cookery?

    21. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by AndroidCat · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, I think that the Americans and the Russians should keep their food in seperate sections of the fridge and cupboards. Annoying, but with some roomies, you just have to. If they sneak your food, leave some dog food in a fancy bowl in the fridge then wait until it disappears. Then when you ask who took your dog food, watch to see who turns green.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    22. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      It's all the Russians fault, for not being able to run an "International" space station completely by themselves. Next they'll be complaining when we want them to pay for the whole thing, too.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    23. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by smacktits · · Score: 1

      That's why I'm glad to be Scottish.

      So am I. Have you ever heard of the Stonner Kebab? It's a "delicacy" being served up in some Glasgow chippies.

    24. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by genka · · Score: 1

      Salo though, is horrible stuff. Oh, no, yu are wrong! Good, fresh salo is difficult to find, but it is as good as a quality sushi. But it's taste degrades very fast, wehn quality goes down.

    25. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I've never been to the UK. I can tell you what the US stereotypes are:

      England: Boiled . . . everything. Yecch.
      Scotland: Organ meat in a stomach. Barf.
      Ireland: Whiskey. Beer for dessert.
      Wales: Where?

      So telling an American that the food in Russia is better than the food in the UK isn't saying much.

      -Peter

    26. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's crap.

    27. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Americans? (Fried Twinkies, Fried applies, Fried

      Fried arteries?

    28. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I've heard it a few times here on /. from Americans, probably who have been to London and eaten in some tourist rip-off joint.

      No.... usually from Americans who live of junk food, who haven't been outside the US in their lives, and get their information form 7th hand rumours from people who went to England in the 1950's.

    29. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or to put it another way - "Absultely bugger all and my opinion is based entirely on hearsay"

    30. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Find a real good pub in the country and you'll get some really fine food that's up there with the best in the world.

      Seconded. Sunday Dinner at the pub on top of Mount Llanwanno near Pont-y-pridd in Wales was probably the best dinner I've ever had. Three courses, and it only cost around 5.50 pounds per person! (which is super cheap over there.. that's how much you pay for a Burger King combo)

    31. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Chicken Tikka Masala

      Yeah and we have great Shish Taouk in Canada.

      Seriously, isn't Tikka Masala indian? Even if some english people make Tikka Masala, doesn't mean it's an english meal.

    32. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The brits were so successful at empire building that they never faced any societal pressure to invent food that tasted good - they always had something made by someone else available. Who's up for a curry?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's British. Or at least it was invented in Britain. Possibly is should be considered Anglo-Indian fusion cuisine. Chicken Tikka is Indian, but the masala sauce is a British innovation.

      Similarly, chop suey is American.

    34. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Nept · · Score: 1

      Really? The only advantage (imho) in Russia was that the food was cheaper. A loaf of bread, 2 fish and a bottle of beer for 30-45 roubles. Outside of the larger cities it was hard to get anything else. In the UK I've had much better food, but I've had to pay a large price for it.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    35. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 0

      Here here. My daily trip to the rynok by metro universitet in Moscow yielded better food than I'd ever had back in the States. The only tradeoff I saw was the huge growth that sprang out of my neck and spewed green, radioactive slime at people walking by.

    36. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      As an American who has traveled around Europe, Brits' culinary reputation is well deserved.

      Even the meals I had at "tourist rip-off joints" in Paris, Rome, and Florence were INFINITELY better than any food I had in London (sans Indian and Chinese places in London, which were fabulous).

      Sorry to have to break it to you guys, but it is not just because France spreading false rumors (and you know how much Americans LOVE French...)

    37. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by StripedSnapper · · Score: 1

      when have you ever heard "Let's go out for British"

    38. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      You do know that we Brits are the culinary laughing stock of the world? That's why I'm glad to be Scottish. Who else would think of the deep fried mars bar / deep fried pizza?

      Indian Curries are only thing, culinary wise, that the UK has going for it. Never has invading another country ever help britian out so much.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    39. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      salo is a greasy lard like substance. Salo is an Italian flick about eating greasy lard like substances.

    40. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have learned at least one new thing today, all is well! I always thought that Tikka Masala was indian because, well, it's part of a series of indian sauces available in the indian corner of my local grocery stores.

    41. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who else would think of the deep fried mars bar / deep fried pizza?

      FDH Americans would be the obvious answer :).

      I'm fed up of our British cuisine being criticised. We have the best kebab shops and curry houses in the world :).

    42. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that we Brits are the culinary laughing stock of the world? That's why I'm glad to be Scottish.

      That would only be because people might think of Scottish food as salmon and haggis. Okay, haggis gets jokes made about it, but it's "real" food.

      Actually, Scottish people are probably the worst. They eat shedloads of processed crap, bugger all veg, and visit the chip shop or McDonalds all the damn time. The Scottish diet is CRAP.

      Scottish food is good, but most Scottish people don't eat it. *sigh*

    43. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by clem · · Score: 1

      Damn you, fried cheese!

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    44. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      So, just how many days did you spend in London, Paris or Rome then?

    45. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      5 days each on a two week trip. Loved it. Best meal I had was the one I had in Rome (the name escapes me, though in was near Piaza della Republica). Fabulous five course meal. The fried zucchini flowers with Turbo was sublime. P.S. Probably the most disappointing culinary experience in London was the afternoon tea at the Ritz (not cheap). We were really looking forward to that one, but it ended up being mediocre and inferior to the afternoon tea we had at Empress Hotel in B.C. Canada.

    46. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the beer.

      -Fried Liver.

    47. Re:Don't bother with the Russian food jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Ireland doesn't sound so bad to some. ;-)

  16. Open sauce application here? by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 4, Funny
    IIRC, the database software that tracks the food inventories on board the space station and the space shuttle on longer flights runs on proprietary code. Perhaps if the software were revamped, and open source software used instead the community could help out a little? Many eyes make for few bugs -- and when the bugs are as easy to spot as the "food" entry reading zero I see no reason to put up with badly written, unfree software.

    Hell, with the savings made they could probably upgrade the menus a bit, instead of eating paste three times a day they could afford to buy the astronauts some hot grits or something equally tasty once in a while.

    --

    Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

    1. Re:Open sauce application here? by pklong · · Score: 1

      No software can keep track of hungry astronaughts raiding the fridge and not booking out what they have taken.

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    2. Re:Open sauce application here? by Greventls · · Score: 1

      potential application of rfid tags?

    3. Re:Open sauce application here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone wonder how long until someone gets just a little too foamy at the mouth and proclaims OSS to be the cure for cancer, AIDs, and the common cold?

    4. Re:Open sauce application here? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      Many eyes make for few bugs

      You mean the bugs have eaten all the food? That would be an explanation!
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:Open sauce application here? by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      That would be a horrible violation of the astronauts' right to privacy!

      Plus, any terrorist with a space shuttle and RFID scanner who wanted to find an American astronaut to kidnap or murder would be able to find them easily. Please think before you post.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    6. Re:Open sauce application here? by Tim+Doran · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Simpsons' reference/Slashdot cliche:

      "I for one welcome our new insect overlords..."

      Sorry folks. Reflex. At least it's not an "In Soviet Russia" joke.

    7. Re:Open sauce application here? by RoundTop-VJAS · · Score: 1

      In soviet russia...

      Fridge raids you

      --
      RoundTop

    8. Re:Open sauce application here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory Simpsons' reference/Slashdot cliche: "I for one welcome our new insect overlords..." Sorry folks. Reflex. At least it's not an "In Soviet Russia" joke.

      Where have you been for the past month? Soviet Russia is passe!

      In Korea, only old people make Soviet Russia jokes!

    9. Re:Open sauce application here? by lew3004 · · Score: 1

      Oh God....you had me until the whole grits statemenmt.

      --
      I still can't get the screen shots of Castle Wolfenstein for the Apple IIe out of my head.
  17. This project needs to be put out of its misery. by sllim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I like my toys as much, no possibly MORE then the next guy. And God knows aviation is my thing.
    The Space Station should be a no brainer.

    But there comes a time where you have to say, 'Look we gave it the good old college try. If it was meant to be it would be a success already, but alas it isn't working out.'.

    For Gods sake deorbit it already.

    Could there possibly be a more humiliating end to the space station then being abondend for lack of food?

    1. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by kfg · · Score: 1

      Could there possibly be a more humiliating end to the space station then being abondend for lack of food?

      Being turned into Howard Stern's new studio?

      KFG

    2. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why would that be humiliating?

      Fucking conservative Stern-basher. Go listen to your Limbaugh

    3. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by R.Caley · · Score: 3, Insightful
      'Look we gave it the good old college try. If it was meant to be it would be a success already, but alas it isn't working out.'.

      Whether it is a sucess depends on what you consider it's purpose to have been. In so far it has a purpose it is to exist and be manned, nothing more, and at that it has suceeded. The problems, beyond the expeted small technical ones, have all been due to America not having a worthwhile launch system to do their end of the job.

      All of the other supposed purposes which it has not suceeded against were bogus anyway. No one had a real scientific mission for it for instance. These purposes were just made up to get the budget past politicians who had no interest in space projets per-se. So, except for the politics, there is no reason to worry that it hasn't achieved them.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    4. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by kfg · · Score: 1

      Why would that be humiliating?

      I'm not sure how to answer a question answered with a question.

      Fucking conservative Stern-basher.

      I did not bash Howard Stern. To the extent that I am a conservative I support him. Supporting the First Ammendment is conservative. It is also liberal. You might want to give some consideration to what the word "conservative" means. I'm not sure it means what you think it means.

      Go listen to your Limbaugh

      This, however, I would have to consider a pretty dire personal attack.

      KFG

    5. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      conservative means greedy, republican, white, christian, fat, american good old boy club. now git from here! go read your bible and pray for Stern's dirty soul.

    6. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by kfg · · Score: 1

      conservative means greedy, republican, white, christian, fat, american good old boy club.

      Thank you for confirming the correctness of my suspicion.

      go read your bible. . .

      "Pride in wealth and position is overlooking one's collapse."

      From my Tao Te Ching.

      . . .pray for Stern's dirty soul.

      Since there is no soul, I'm not sure how one could get dirt on it.

      KFG

    7. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, just don't feed the trolls :)

    8. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. But sometimes munching on them, just a bit, while you're feeding them is hard to resist.

      Ain't dysfunctional internet relationships fun?

      KFG

    9. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problems, beyond the expeted small technical ones, have all been due to America not having a worthwhile launch system to do their end of the job.

      I like how you left out the part about Russia not being able to pay for their modules so they could be completed and sent up on time.

    10. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      I like how you left out the part about Russia not being able to pay for their modules so they could be completed and sent up on time.

      That's just a delay in adding bells and whistles, the shuttle being useless has basicly crippled the day to day operation. There would be little problem with the resident's pigging out if the resupply schedule wasn't so touch-and-go.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    11. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by emilymildew · · Score: 1

      This argument is about six times funnier if you're only reading your side, KFG.

      Just thought I'd share.

      (Browsing at 1)

    12. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by kfg · · Score: 1

      I particularly like the way the first exchange in the above came out, myself. :)

      I think it's time to find a new partner though. Improv goes all to hell if both participants don't hold up their end.

      KFG

    13. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      conservative means greedy, republican, white, christian, fat, american good old boy club.

      Clearly `conservative' means `keeping all the dictionaries to oneself'.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    14. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by sporty · · Score: 1

      When you make a lot of money, and perception is key, egos are insane. You and I, who prolly don't make $200k a year or more and "have power", would readily kill off such a project. But you blemish their unwritten records, and people start getting beligerent, and hard headed. Look at anything in todays age or yesteryear. When money and power get in the mix, common sense goes the other direction.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    15. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      Without those "bells and whistles" the space station can't support more than three people - whose time is taken up almost completely with maintenance. Without more people, the station can do almost no science.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    16. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      Without more people, the station can do almost no science.

      The first three words of the above are redundant.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    17. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      NASA cancelled the Crew Return Vehicle project that was to act as the lifeboat for up to seven people on the ISS. Without this CRV, the soyuz currently acting as a lifeboat can only support 3 people, with 2 being the minimum crew required to maintain the ship. With all the time taken up on pure station maintenance, theres no time for sience, and they cant put a third person up as the supply missions cannot carry enough goods. This situation has little to do with Russia being unable to supply the 'bells and whistles'.

    18. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by Biomechanical · · Score: 1

      Yeah, shame about the X-38 (Crew Return Vehicle).

      I really wanted to see the Farscape module up and flying in real life rather than just in a television show.

      --
      His name is Robert Paulsen...
    19. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by term8or · · Score: 1

      The real scientific mission for the space station was to see whether people could survive in space for extended periods of time. And it has succeeded in the mission, despite the logistics problems.

      --



      "As a writer / novelist you might want to spellcheck your sig. :) " - AC
    20. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We paid for the majority of the russian hardware and now we're supposed to make all the trips to the store, too? I suppose you want us to buy all the beer, too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Just be careful. Last time I poked fun at a troll I was DOS'd. No sense of humor those damn dirty trolls!
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    22. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could there possibly be a more humiliating end to the space station then being abondend for lack of food?

      Well, yeah. If everyone died I think that would be worse.

    23. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real scientific mission for the space station was to see whether people could survive in space for extended periods of time.

      Unfortunately, six month tours are not telling us a lot more than we already knew from the Salyuts and Mir. Extending tours to, say, 12 months, and increasing crew size to get a bigger sample, is important for real success.

    24. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by jaywee · · Score: 1

      During deliberations of the "president's commission on moon&mars&beyond" the head of ESA said that ESA has teams(from industry) waiting for station completion to conduct science...

    25. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether it is a sucess depends on what you consider it's purpose to have been. In so far it has a purpose it is to exist and be manned, nothing more, and at that it has suceeded.... All of the other supposed purposes which it has not suceeded against were bogus anyway.

      I'm sure another purpose was to keep funding for the Russian space program. You don't want this technology to be sold all over the world and applied (with the help of the same specialists that developed it) to development and manufacturing of missiles.

    26. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      In so far it has a purpose it is to exist and be manned, nothing more, and at that it has suceeded.

      I thought that the ISS' purpose was mostly to keep our aerospace contractors fat and happy -- a task at which it has succeeded. Therefore, even if it is abandoned. Even if it is deorbited, as suggested by ancestor posting, it has accomplished its true purpose.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    27. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      I believe that it would be possible to dock 2 Soyuz, at least eventually. That doubles the possible capacity. Haven't they been using Progress vehicles for resupply since the beginning, though?

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    28. Re:This project needs to be put out of its misery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they had shuttles to help them I believe.

  18. Fantastic by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mod that fucker up!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  19. Well..... by kaedemichi255 · · Score: 1

    ....it beats the Atkins diet ;)

  20. And there's no real science going on... by CodeWanker · · Score: 3, Informative

    This could be the final straw for the ISS boondoggle. You can't do astronomy from the station that's even a tenth of the precision of Hubble. Why? All the vibrations from all the environmental gear. In fact, you can't do decent science experiments of any type. Why? Two people can't take time from just holding the place together to do the experiments, and we lack the budget (and now - the food!) to have a big enough crew to make the place something other than a multi-billion-dollar Astronaut Habitrail. Right now, it's no better than Mir was in its final days: astronauts spend all their time trying not to die. '"At present, the primary goal of the ISS is unclear," the NRC study observes.' I think it's dangerously close to changing from an investment to a sunk cost.

    --


    "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    1. Re:And there's no real science going on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, why cant we have a real space station that can sustain it's self?

      Why do we not design and build a ring station so the astronauts and scientists can be more comfortable in at least 1/2 gravity. plus why can we not put it out a little further s othat station keeping fuel useage is minimized? (i know the shuttle sucks and cant get out anyfarther)

      we need to make real stations, not these greyhound buses ducttaped together that we keep building.

      the ISS is not much different than the old skylab and Mir stations.

      how about spending 1/2 of what we are wasting in IRAQ on a real station?

    2. Re:And there's no real science going on... by igb · · Score: 1
      And remember, this is the technology that will be built on for long-duration missions to Mars. Remind us how they'll top up the food supplies for that?

      Manned space travel is useless showboating. People should read Feynmann's put-down of the shuttle: ``I didn't pay any attention, because they said there was science being done but I never saw any of it in the journals I read''. That's from memory, but it's not far off.

      ian

    3. Re:And there's no real science going on... by CodeWanker · · Score: 1

      Yup. The only justification for manned space travel is colonization. We need self-sufficient colonies so we can survive global cataclysms. As Arthur C Clarke says: "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have space travel." But if the pinnacle of the dino space program was the ISS, they'd still be extinct.

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    4. Re:And there's no real science going on... by pocopoco · · Score: 1

      Bah, at least the ISS has some meaning. Astronomy is the laughing stock of all the sciences with only a modicum of value to the physicists. The space program is dying because it puts so much money into astronomy, something the vast majority of people see as useless and boring. Back when space exploration actually involved people the technological side benefits were much better for society and it was actually possible to get excited about space missions.

      If you guys want your advanced space stations that means you have to pay $$$ into space station technologies. This includes funding the intermediate versions instead of those useless telescopes. Money into astronomy is good for little more than intellectual masturbation. Money into manned space exploration develops useful technology and the science behind it at a much greater rate and it expands man's capabilities. Don't pay the money, the technology will never develop, we'll never enter space in any significant amount as a species, and all that astronomy will be even more useless than it is now.

    5. Re:And there's no real science going on... by Biomechanical · · Score: 1

      ok, why cant we have a real space station that can sustain it's self?

      Mainly because of two things; Lack of imagination on the part of the decision makers in the government, and Cost.

      Why do we not design and build a ring station so the astronauts and scientists can be more comfortable in at least 1/2 gravity. plus why can we not put it out a little further s othat station keeping fuel useage is minimized? (i know the shuttle sucks and cant get out anyfarther)

      Cost and lack of imagination again.

      we need to make real stations, not these greyhound buses ducttaped together that we keep building.

      the ISS is not much different than the old skylab and Mir stations.

      how about spending 1/2 of what we are wasting in IRAQ on a real station?

      Well, it's simple young Nony.
      Your average politician has the attention span of a Nat with A.D.D., the morals of a crocodile, and the imagination of a dumb rock - unlike ordinary rocks which imagine finding themselves a cool stream to be slowly smoothed and massaged in.

      All a politician wants is basically two things; A way to make people think s/he's making their lives better so they keep on putting him in charge, and their ridiculously high wages and benefits packages.

      These men that allocate budgets for such things as a rotational space-station with centrifically simulated gravity and multi-acre green house, don't personally want a space station, so they don't think anyone else would want one either.
      They lack the capacity to understand why men would want to go into space and see other planets and look for alien civilisations.

      Let's take a surgical circular saw and look inside the mind of this politician I happen to have prepared earlier,
      "Ooo, pay day this week... constituents happy? Course they're happy, the television told them to be happy... Better not let them get too happy, they might forget that they need me to do, stuff... Hoo boy, look at the tits on that intern... Hey, there's a fifty sticking out of that guys wallet... damn, I missed it. Hope he comes back later..."

      Now let's ask him a question about space.

      `Hmmm, space? With the stars?'

      "What the hell do these geeks want with space? Don't they know there's liquor, and women, and money down here? I don't want to go into space, I've got my big car, and nice house, and trophy family, and thousands of people kissing my fat ass every day. Fuck space."

      `Oh yes, yes, a noble pursuit. Here, {reaches into his own wallet}, have a couple of million.'

      Now let's mention a fictitious enemy that might be remotely indirectly after the politician's property.

      `Terrorists want us to stop pouring tonnes of waste into landfills because if we don't they'll detonate a what? A Grotty Bomb? Good Lord! That might make people too scared. I might get blamed. I could lose my high paying position in the government! Here, {reaches into tax payers pockets}, take 200 Billion dollars and go kill those commie bastards!'

      To summarise: The men making the decisions and providing the needed funds for research are stupid, that's why our space programs fail.

      --
      His name is Robert Paulsen...
    6. Re:And there's no real science going on... by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      I think the most important science going on is the lessons we are hopefully learning in how to make one of these damn things stay up in pretty good shape. First we built Skylab, and then it sank into the swamp. Then we built MIR, and then it sank into the swamp. After that, we built ISS, and it's sinking into the swamp. Eventually, we'll get it right.

      Also keep in mind that many of the problems going on up there have to do with the fact that the Space Shuttle isn't running up there five or six times a year the way it was supposed to.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    7. Re:And there's no real science going on... by CodeWanker · · Score: 2, Informative

      The ISS has no meaning beyond the political. We've snapped together a crummy space station out of poorly constructed pieces. Huzzah. We COULD have built a station that actually embraced a new construction technology, or a self-sustaining biosphere. But we didn't. We built a rickety Habitrail In The Sky.

      And while you're happy trolling on Astronomy, I'm satisfied with: discovering new planets around other stars, determining the source of all the elemental building blocks of our planet, determining that complex organic molecules are cosmically common, determining that the laws of physics apply everywhere we can look. Trivial things like that. The vast majority of people see astronomy as useless? Fine. It doesn't mean the vast majority is right.

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    8. Re:And there's no real science going on... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      a multi-billion-dollar Astronaut Habitrail.

      Before you can send people to Mars, you need to figure out stuff the hard way, like, can we run out of food despite our incredible planning skills? Turns out you can.

      The space station is an ungoing experiment in space station maintenance and astronaut survival. The results are interresting, we sure seem to have a lot to say about them around here. : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:And there's no real science going on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before I think your opinion is worth a turd, please learn to spell, and which words DON'T EVEN EXIST IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, MOTHERFUCKER.
      'Itself' is a very good word, you don't need to type 'it's self' (it is self?).
      Also, give me your email so I can Paypal you 5 cents to BUY A SHIFT KEY, BUTT NUGGET.

    10. Re:And there's no real science going on... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

      I'm not looking for work right now, but I WOULD like a Pacific Rim job.

      I hear there's a section of Craig's list *cough* where you might be able to find someone who's interested in helping you out on that one.

      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    11. Re:And there's no real science going on... by CodeWanker · · Score: 1

      I think we can cover most of these issues with the decades of experience we've had with nuclear submarines. They go our and stay submerged for 3 months at a time. Also, I don't know how incredible our planning skills are when we decided to rely on a support vehicle that we knew had a 1 in 50 chance of catastrophically failing. The ISS is supposed to be a platform for science we can't do on Earth or in earlier space stations, and so far, it's not delivering at all.

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    12. Re:And there's no real science going on... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I think we can cover most of these issues with the decades of experience we've had with nuclear submarines.

      Weightlessness...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    13. Re:And there's no real science going on... by Martin65 · · Score: 1

      The science that is going on is the building and maintaining of the station itself, which will provide tremendously valuable knowledge and skills for future spacecraft builders.

      I think they just do the other "science" stuff (like microgravity research) so it looks to the layperson that they are doing something useful, and so that they can get the funding easier.

    14. Re:And there's no real science going on... by CodeWanker · · Score: 1

      Mir...

      We've got all the long-term data we need on the effects of weightlessness. It's bad and we should avoid it.

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    15. Re:And there's no real science going on... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      We've got all the long-term data we need on the effects of weightlessness. It's bad and we should avoid it.

      So it's neat that we have a platform on which to experiment further and try out countermeasures.
      Avoid it... sheesh. Scurvy is bad, we should avoid it, let's not sail out anymore! I don't like that attitude.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    16. Re:And there's no real science going on... by CodeWanker · · Score: 1

      Not at all. We know how to use centrifugal force to counter weightlessness. But, even though we've known this for a very long time (gyroscopes have been around for centuries,) we have yet to incorporate it into a station's design. I'm saying don't go sailing without vitamin C.

      --


      "Wow. Now THAT'S a lot of angry Indians." - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer
    17. Re:And there's no real science going on... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      But, even though we've known this for a very long time (gyroscopes have been around for centuries,) we have yet to incorporate it into a station's design.

      Yeah, what's up with that? I remember the Disney-animated NASA movies from the 50's showing a perfectly reasonable tore-shaped design and a plane-like shuttle.
      It took them 20 years to get the plane, they never even tried to do the fake-gravity station.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    18. Re:And there's no real science going on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "ok, why cant we have a real space station that can sustain it's self?"

      Because unlike sci-fi this is not exactly easy to do without making politicans choke on the cost.

      "Why do we not design and build a ring station so the astronauts and scientists can be more comfortable in at least 1/2 gravity. plus why can we not put it out a little further s othat station keeping fuel useage is minimized? (i know the shuttle sucks and cant get out anyfarther)"

      Because if something fails you have a station ripping itself apart. Also fixing a problem on the outside of the station would not be fun (not only do they have EVA gear to deal with but now they also have gravity).

      "we need to make real stations, not these greyhound buses ducttaped together that we keep building."

      Because it's not easy to make a space station.

    19. Re:And there's no real science going on... by BigGerman · · Score: 1
      Dont forget Russians built at least 7 "Salute" stations before Mir (At least, because some flew under various military designations) and had routine 1.5 year long missions.

      Long time before ISS, everything we (humankind) wanted to try on the LEO were already tried many times. That is what makes ISS so pointless.

  21. This has got to be one of the few jobs .... by kernelblaha · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...where finishing ahead of schedule is a bad thing!

    Maybe the astronauts jus ate too much all year so that they can be back home for Christmas turkey.

    --
    Million dollar sig.
    1. Re:This has got to be one of the few jobs .... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

      Physics is to mathematics as sex is to masturbation." Richard Feynman

      See, it all depends on context. Let's apply this to a woman who has difficulty with vaginal orgasms, but can come multiple times when masturbating.

      From her perspective, your sig interprets along the lines of:

      "Physics is OK, but without Mathematics on a regular basis, I'd go nuts. Hmmmmm, mathematics..."

      Was that the intended meaning? ;-)

      .02

      cLive ;-)

      And yes, I did a math(s) degree :)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  22. sheesh by caino59 · · Score: 1

    if that was me up there, i'd be pissed that the fastest they can come up with anything is 2 weeks away...and another 2 week away wait if the first one fails.

    What if something serious happened up there?

    *ding*
    going up!

    1. Re:sheesh by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      What if something serious happened up there?


      In that case they would come down....
      They do have an escape soyouz capsule.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how many times has that been tested?

    3. Re:sheesh by angusr · · Score: 1
      If anything serious happens they get in the Soyuz capsule and come down. End of story. You can't do "emergency rescue flights", despite what the movies tell you. And this flight isn't "fastest they can come up with anything" flight - it's scheduled. It's always been scheduled for that date. They haven't come up with anything.

      It takes a lot of time to prepare a spacecraft for launch; for example, the next space shuttle to fly is already being prepared and has been for quite some time, despite the proposed launch date being three or fouth months away. Progress and Soyuz launches may process a little quicker, but not that much - and they get built to order, so Soyuz vehicles for some flights next year may not even be assembled yet.

      The only situation where an "emergency rescue flight" could be attempted is where a spacecraft was already fairly advanced in processing and the processing could be accelerated in some way. For example, if it had been realised early on in Columbia's last flight that there was wing damage in theory it would have been possible to accelerate the processing of the next shuttle (Atlantis, IIRC) so that it could launch, rendezvous with Columbia and transfer the crew just before the resources on Columbia were used up. However, that would have required the processing and launch to go completely smoothly with no holds of any kind and Atlantis to launch with the same possibility of getting the same damage.

      In that situation, however, it would have been attempted - there was no other choice (other than a jury-rigged attempt to repair the damage). Unlike on the ISS there was no other craft to re-enter in, and not enough resources to wait more than a few days.

      If Atlantis hadn't been due to launch relatively closely behind Columbia there would have been no "emergency flight" possibility at all.

      Astronauts, cosmonauts, and space tourists - once they're up there they are on their own. It might only be a couple of hundred kilometres, but it may as well be a million if there's a major problem.

    4. Re:sheesh by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Every time a crew is changed (roughly once every six months). The soyouz of the new crew stays up and the old crew use the capsule that has been hanging there for half a year.

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    5. Re:sheesh by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

      This, it seems to me, is a major problem. Is the processing any/much faster than in the Apollo days? I don't know, and either way, the process needs to be sped up.

      Reminds me too much of the ship in "the Cold Equations." There are a lot of ways that current space flight is like that that can't be helped at this point, but it would seem to me that this isn't one of them.

      --
      This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  23. Easy to solve send them Spam by Portal1 · · Score: 1

    Spam Spam Spam
    I know you like it.

    --
    There are no stupid questions, Just a lot of inquisitive idiots. (from a good friend)
  24. This is really bad by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem with living in microgravity is that the lack of acceleration results in the decalcification of bones and the atrophy of muscle tissue. Some exercise (like the much-mocked Soloflex) can help stave off this atrophy, but the real key to the whole solution is to keep calcium and protein levels in the body high.

    Restricting food intake will result in some very serious physical damage to the astronauts. If you've ever seen footage of astronauts who have just returned to Earth after a long mission, they are hardly able to stand. That is with full nutrition. The poor astronauts up there now will have to deal with much lowered calcium and protein reserves in their blood and will likely suffer from advanced osteoporosis as well as general muscular atrophy.

    I'd go ahead and blame Windows programmers for this mistake. But in all seriousness, this is probably a result of the reliance on the cooperation of multiple nations to do the right thing according to the schedule. It's hard enough getting cats into a pen, it's that much harder to get countries known for 'cutting corners' (like Russia) to do their job correctly.

    1. Re:This is really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, don't feed the trolls. You'll only encourage them.

    2. Re:This is really bad by Wudbaer · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's hard enough getting cats into a pen, it's that much harder to get countries known for 'cutting corners' (like Russia) to do their job correctly.

      Without the corner-cutting Russians they would have to wait for the next Space Shuttle for food... could be a long hungry wait. (yes, I know that they have a Soyus capsule for emergencies, which incidentially also is Russian).

    3. Re:This is really bad by Tap-Sa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But in all seriousness, this is probably a result of the reliance on the cooperation of multiple nations to do the right thing according to the schedule.

      Like regular shuttle flights...

    4. Re:This is really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by posting as an AC you are a "troll"

      damn, im feeing them too.

    5. Re:This is really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      how about the bunch of pussies called the american government that will not get off their asses and make a shuttle replacement AND fix their current shuttles and get them up there.

      it's bullshit, they can fix what caused the accident easily, why are they so farking afraid to launch the shuttles again?

      the country formerly known as the USSR did not jolin this expecting ther big player to bail on them because they are fucking pussies.

      I GUARENTEE there is a line of astronauts willing to go up on the shuttle RIGHT NOW.

    6. Re:This is really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello! I like the way you blame this on the russians for cutting corners.

      Well how about this for a stereotype - its probably the fault of the american astronaut for 'eating all the pies'.

      typical bloody yanks.

    7. Re:This is really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you are feeding yourself as well. How does it taste?

    8. Re:This is really bad by bsartist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's hard enough getting cats into a pen, it's that much harder to get countries known for 'cutting corners' (like Russia) to do their job correctly.

      Um, you do realize, don't you, that the effects you're talking about here were documented by Soviet cosmonauts after long-term missions aboard Mir? Sounds to me like they did their jobs pretty damn well.

      Oh, and in case you missed it, the Russians aren't coming up short when it comes to ISS flights - NASA is. The Russians are stepping up to the plate and getting both US and Russian crew into orbit.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    9. Re:This is really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it tastes like victory.

      Polluting slashdot, one troll post at a time.

    10. Re:This is really bad by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it's that much harder to get countries known for 'cutting corners' (like Russia) to do their job correctly..

      And the only reason that it's the Russians who are supplying the station is because of the Columbia disaster:

      But he said it is no more critical than previous supply runs, which have been conducted exclusively by the Russians ever since last year's Columbia disaster.

      Before moaning about other countries, perhaps you should look to the problems in your own...

    11. Re:This is really bad by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's hard enough getting cats into a pen, it's that much harder to get countries known for 'cutting corners' (like Russia) to do their job correctly.

      Of course, it's a shame that the Russians are almost two years behind with their planned space shuttle flights to ISS. Oh, wait ...
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    12. Re:This is really bad by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      "It's hard enough getting cats into a pen, it's that much harder to get countries known for 'cutting corners' (like Russia) to do their job correctly."

      Unlike the yanks who really splah out on o-rings, tiles and bits of foam ....

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    13. Re:This is really bad by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The problem with living in microgravity is that the lack of acceleration results in the decalcification of bones and the atrophy of muscle tissue....the real key to the whole solution is to keep calcium and protein levels in the body high...Restricting food intake will result in some very serious physical damage to the astronauts.

      Couldn't they eat mostly just the foods high in protein and calcium for their diet? Remember, they are supposed to have a 30-day spare supply by the time they are scheduled to leave, so they could just leave mostly the low-protein stuff as the 30-day emergency backup, and restock it on the next visit.

    14. Re:This is really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It tastes sorta like chicken.

    15. Re:This is really bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      The Russians are the only reason the ISS is up there (current supply missions, critical modules, etc) but don't forget who funded those critical modules.

      Because it wasn't the Russian government.

    16. Re:This is really bad by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      These people will likely beat the US gov't to it. :)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    17. Re:This is really bad by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Apparently the problem allegedly is because the prev crew ate mostly the foods high in protein and calcium... Meat and milk.

      So these two don't have much of those left.

      --
    18. Re:This is really bad by mesmartyoudumb · · Score: 1

      You DO realize, that the more protein your body takes in, the more calcium it breaks down? :)

      Exercise: yes.
      Eating more protein: No.

      --
      "Comedy's a dead art form. Now tragedy, that's funny."
    19. Re:This is really bad by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      "...don't forget who funded those critical modules."

      Dennis Tito?

    20. Re:This is really bad by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Russians are the only reason the ISS is up there (current supply missions, critical modules, etc) but don't forget who funded those critical modules.

      The Russians did, with decades of research on space stations and on MIR that reduced the cost of the life support systems down to something the Americans could actually afford for the ISS.

      And then along comes NASA; boo-hoo we need a lifesupport and we can't afford to develop it...

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    21. Re:This is really bad by s1234d · · Score: 1

      Apparently the Russians have lost most of their data from the Mir days (and prior to that) and end up quoting data obtained from the Skylab missions. Tragic if true.

  25. Survivor! by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why not turn it into a new reality TV show, a la Survivor? This could easily provide a smidgen of the funding to keep the space station going. And instead of voting people off the space station, the person who loses a challenge gets eaten, so the food situation practically solves itself.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Survivor! by AC-x · · Score: 1

      Actually I seem to remember that before they started work on ISS there was some talk of doing a reality-tv series on board called Astronauts, heck I'd watch it. "This weeks we 'ave put the station-mates on a 'alf rations, lets see 'ow they're doin"

    2. Re:Survivor! by cybertears · · Score: 1

      That would be a very short lived series seeing as how there are only two people aboard.

    3. Re:Survivor! by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      Let's have a normal TV show, where people that suggest the creation of reality shows get launched into space to be astronaut food. :D

    4. Re:Survivor! by karnal · · Score: 1

      So we'll have a commentator with an australian accent? Will he attempt to jam his thumb up the astronaut's buttholes?

      --
      Karnal
  26. Confessions of a sated astronaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, whatcha gonna do...
    No shit, there I was, the International Space Station. Just me and my two friends, up in space like a bunch of regular dopeheads. But yaknow, there's not much up here to really DO, if you know what I mean... Sure, there's all kinds of expensive equipment and laboratory experiments, but when you're off your shift, there's not much to do except staring out in space or trying to sleep.
    Have you ever tried sleeping in zero-gee? Well, it doesn't work for me, so I decided to hit the fridge instead.
    I know, I know, I shouldn't have, but when you're all alone at night up there in space, those tubes of processed food start to taste really good. So, okay, maybe I did eat a few tubes too many, but hey, put yourself in my shoes. As I said, there's not much else for us to do up there but to eat.

    Well, that's my confession anyway, I didn't mean to eat all that much, and I sure hope we will get some new flavors when the supply boat comes on the 25th!

  27. Sick Sick Nasa by Lili+Queen+of+Darkne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, they Nasa is such a wonderful organisation. They did : a poem (http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/artgallery/soto_po em.html/), some photo shoots with aerosmith (http://http//www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogallery /index.html) and so much more. What can you say, i guess now is the time for serious issues, like food on space stations, lol. Those who wonder at those who do wonder, while those who do, well, do. Unless, i do wonder?

  28. Interesting and worrying too! by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It's interesting to note that as Americans, who believe we have the best and greatest technology on the globe (though we depend a lot on other countires), cannot get [back] to the Space Station unless we utilize "out-dated" Russian technology!

    This hurts me because in a few decades, when the majority of our manufacturing base has been outsourced, we'll have to depend on outside help for the very basics of our way of life. This is already happening if one considers the flu vaccine.

    The Russians, though poor, seem to make better technical decisions. I remember a slashdotter mentioning here sometime ago that Russian helicopters can be fixed with the simplest of everyday materials and still deliver (read reliably fly)! Contrast that with American ones that require hours of maintenance for a few hours of flight. The Sea Kings (of Canada) require 30 hours of maintenance for every hour of flight, and they are unavailable for operations 40 per cent of the time. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/cdnmilitary/seak ing.html.

    Imagine...........!

    1. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by tekrat · · Score: 1



      Although ironically, we're the last to get the really good Japanese gadgets, and for some reason, American TV shows premeire in the UK before they air on American TV. Go figure....

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    2. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      The Russian stuff is simple not out of philosophy, but because they're forced to make do with whatever is availible. Sure, the heli will fly, but does it have radar, GPS, IFF, air conditioning, redundant controls, and other modern comforts? I sure as hell wouldn't fly on a Russian aircraft.

      The Canadaian example is sad...though it's entirely due to the gov't underfunding their military and not buying new helis to replace the ancient Sea Kings. Used to be, the Canadian Forces punched far about their weight class. These days, they've atrophied so far, I don't know if they can recover.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans do have some of "... the best and greatest technology on the globe ..." but is it always appropriate and necessary? Whether or not this is really true I'm not sure but I like the story anyway.

      The Americans decided their astronauts needed an ink pen that would work in microgravity and spent vast summs of money and resources developing a way for the ink to flow properly in a weightless environment. I think you can even buy these pens for yourself now.

      What do the Russians do?

      Use a pencil!

    4. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I sure as hell wouldn't fly on a Russian aircraft.

      The above is an example of western prejudices. The Russians have some of the world's best technologies and they do not go arround trumpeting their achievements.

      If the best American scientists can rely on Russian technology, who are you not to? The Soyuz has done more than 1,600 flights over several decades without a single glitch, yet the exercise is very complex.

      The world knows that without Russian expertise, the US would not have been able to handle the ISS project, even with all the help of the rest of the world. No wonder, the "best" technology in the world failed in Vietnam, and might still fail in Iraq!

      When it was time to retire the MIR space station, I remember American pundits doubting the ability of Russians to "land" it in the wanted spot in the Pacific ocean. As usual, the Russians kept a very low profile, eventually crashig MIR as scheduled, with pin point accuracy into the Pacific.

      After that, I remember Americans wanting to withdraw their skeptism. To see how Americans "respect" the Russians, the Russians should just make a deal supplying some nuclear knowledge to some country. Lately, Putin told the world that though the American idea of a missile shield is wonderful, it will NOT work. Because Americans want money, they go ahead with it. In the coming decades, Russians will be proven right just as the predicted with the Space Shuttle. Go figure!

      Before I go...remember that when the Chinese "captured" some American aircraft and demanded that it NOT be flown out of China, the Americans used...you guessed right: a Russian made Antonov http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/an-124.h tm. Once again, the worlds greatest country relied on "out-dated" Russian technology to transport the crippled aircraft! I guess the software you use also has some Russian input, thanks to out-sourcing.

    5. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by Skyfire · · Score: 3, Informative

      This has got to be the urban legend that pisses me off the most, just because so many people try to make a point out of it. Long story short, originally both the USA and the USSR used pencils, but they would cause problems in microgravity due to the leads breaking and floating around in the air. The Fisher pen company developed the pen with their own money and sold each pen to nasa for only 2.95.

      --
      Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
    6. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by CanadianCrackPot · · Score: 1

      Yeah but if we skimp on that maintenance and pack them with high explosives, we have our own WMDs. In all seriousness most of the SeaKings are Search and Rescue, and I'd sooner take the chances on my own then have one of those flying death traps come to put the final nail in the coffin.

      --
      Good programmers drink beer to relieve job stress.
      Great programmers drink hard liquor and work best hungover.
    7. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by realkiwi · · Score: 1

      Your food sucks too... Well the food you export. I actually managed to eat quite well when I was over visiting your country.

      --
      realkiwi
    8. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by master_p · · Score: 1

      There is a story going around about Americans spending millions of dollars trying to improve the pen that can be used in environments that have no gravity (with miniature pump to push out the ink), while at the same time Russians used a ...pencil!

    9. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by EndingPop · · Score: 1

      Just comparing the two segments of the station can give a good idea of the difference between US and Russian engineering. The Americans tend to over-engineer things, but that's generally a good thing on-orbit. The problem comes in when that over-engineering makes everything more complicated. It's more likely to break down due to this complication, and the simpler Russian design stands out. Another good example is the pen Nasa spent a log of money to create so astronauts could write in space...and the Russians use pencils.

      --
      My Company - Red Cedar Technology
    10. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      If the Russians have great space tech, said tech is surely not in use on aircraft. Russian air service has the worst safety record of anything not in Africa.

      No arguments on the Russians being able to competently crash their space station.

      The Antonov was used because it's the biggest aircraft in the world. The right tool for the right job.

      I have a sneaking suspicion you have an alternate life as a USENET troll with a radical Russian nationalist agenda. A bonus for avoiding ALL CAPS to make your points.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    11. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like somebody else mentioned, the fisher space pen (google for it) was developed independently from NASA. Besides, it doesn't use a pump, it uses pressurized inkreservoirs. I own one, they write reasonably well.

    12. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Sigh...ancient urban legend. See snopes.com for the usual debunking. The TV show "West Wing" recently reported this hoax as true, so probably more people believe it now.

      A regular pencil creates lots of graphite dust, which is a big problem in zero gravity. It gets into computer gear and creates short circuits.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    13. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      No arguments on the Russians being able to competently crash their space station.

      After all, Mir was 10 years over its planned lifetime. Unlike the two space shuttles the US-Americans managed to crash. Not to mention that the Mir crew survived ...
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    14. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      > Another good example is the pen Nasa spent a
      > log of money to create so astronauts could
      > write in space...and the Russians use pencils.

      Charming, but false.

    15. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can fix American helicopters with bubble gum too -- we just don't rate them as flight safe in that state.

    16. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by Phronesis · · Score: 1
      You can fix American helicopters with bubble gum too -- we just don't rate them as flight safe in that state.

      Besides, all our bubble-gum is reserved for making space shuttles flight-safe.

    17. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Canadian here. Just a note about those Sea Kings... not really the same thing. Its not that they are technologically complex that takes 30 hours maintaince, its the fact that each one is about a billion years old (give or take a million years), and are just falling apart.
      Peace,
      DarthVain

    18. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The Russian technology is outdated. However, so is ours. The shuttle should have been replaced by now but the necessary research hasn't been done, particularly in the prototyping stage. Instead of building newer and better launch vehicles (or applying modern technology to the [mostly?] disposable heavy lift vehicle concept) we've been pissing around with the same "space truck" for ages. It's time for some new American spacecraft. In particular we need to improve the size of the space station, so we can use it for our jumping-off point to Mars. Assuming we ever bother to go :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by sjames · · Score: 1

      There is a story going around about Americans spending millions of dollars

      As others have pointed out, it is just an urban legend. However, the spirit behind that story is somewhat true.

      Mir is a good example. Consider the problem of power loss. NASA's solution for avoiding disaster is to make power triple redundant and use exotic tech. The Russian approach is to make ppower failure non-fatal by providing simple scrubbers and oxygen candles.

      To be fair, the russian approach isn't perfect either. If I were going to live on a space station, I think I'd like one where NASA designs the primary systems and Russia designs the backups.

      I think the story goes around mostly because, in spirit at least, it's true enough and most people relate better to pencil vs. million dollar pen than to comparisons of life support design.

    20. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      I use my Russian space pen everyday.... (actually it's just a pencil)

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    21. Re:Interesting and worrying too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrast that with American ones that require hours of maintenance for a few hours of flight. The Sea Kings (of Canada) require 30 hours of maintenance for every hour of flight, and they are unavailable for operations 40 per cent of the time.

      You are really missing the point. The Sea Kings are ancient helicopters that reached the end of their service life long ago. They should be sold for scrap. That is why they need so much maintenance.

      Towards the end of Brian Mulroney's term of office as prime minister, he ordered replacement helicoptors. When "Papa Doc" Chretien became prime minister, he cancelled the order, paying over $500 million in penalties.

      Only recently has the Liberal government realized the error of its ways and is looking to replace the helicopters.

  29. meanwhile, in the most expensive SPA in the sky by jsveiga · · Score: 1

    ...the creature's growing attraction to the humans makes it harder and harder for it to stay hidden. The cold, shrink-wrapped supplies it has been feeding from tastes like plastic, and something inside it slowly takes the form of a desire for warm, wet, red flesh...

  30. Where did the food go? Joketime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Where'd the space-food go?
    1. Sally Struther's stowed away!
    2. Somebody's got a... space tapeworm! (echo echo echo...)
    3. The astronauts threw all their carbs out the airlock during the Atkins diet fad
    4. They're actually low on fuel and are using the unpopular food as mass reaction mass for station-keeping.
    5. One of the astronauts is a mole whose mission is to inocuously sabotage the mission so that the ISS can be mothballed early and the funds diverted.
    6. They grew some chronic weed in the spare hydroponic bay... and... got the munchies (shhh!)
    7. Space Herpes! (nobody's seen Ice Pirates have they?)
    8. The food shortage was planned -- the astronauts are performing a life-extension experiment by going on a calorie-restricted diet IN SPACE (echo echo echo)
    9. The astronauts were secretly put on space-steroids, which vastly increased their appetites.
    10. In Korea, only old mission controllers count calories.
    I'm all out of ideas... now I have to get back to work for Conan O'Brian's sad sad show.
    1. Re:Where did the food go? Joketime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With writers like you its no wonder Conan is #1!!!

    2. Re:Where did the food go? Joketime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah Ice pirates was a great scifi Bmovie from the 1980's. The time travel stuff was hokey but I like the idea of fighting for water because we are going to do that in the future to

  31. Re:Sick joke... by TehHustler · · Score: 1

    Told completely incorrectly. Q) Why does everyone at NASA drink Pepsi? A) Because they can't get 7-Up

    --

    TheHustler
    http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
    http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
  32. How many astronauts? by hashwolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...the astronauts, one American and one Russian..." That's just ONE astronaut right?

    --
    - "They misunderestimated me."
    1. Re:How many astronauts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, that's one astronaut and one cosmonaut

    2. Re:How many astronauts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction...
      One cosmonaut and a few remains of an astronaut.

      guess who got the munchies...

    3. Re:How many astronauts? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      yea, that's one astronaut and one cosmonaut

      Well, technically, they don't leave low Earth orbit, so I wouldn't call them astronaut/cosmonaut.

      I think they should be called LEOnauts.

  33. Re:Sick joke... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Informative
    No...fricking moron.

    Q: Why do they only drink Sprite at NASA?

    A: Because they can't get 7-Up!

    And the Challenger didn't go up, it went down. Fuck dude...get it straight. The Iraqi Information Minister's second cousin was more funny than you.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  34. Why Diet? by haxhia · · Score: 0

    I thought the only people that diet are the people that want to lose weight. For example people in Ethiopia were trying to achieve perfectness--getting back to their birth weight....but these astronauts , surely they have passed that stage.....they weight nothing....i'm confused.

  35. Let's do a benefit concert! by tekrat · · Score: 1

    To help those starving astronauts!

    Just like the 80's when Ethopia needed food, or those Willy Nelson Farm-Aid concerts, we can get a group of singers to make a song about Xmas and feeding those in space!

    "Feed the world! And Space Station guys too!"

    Where's Michael Jackson when you need him?

    The Alternate idea is to make Space Station Survior and turn it into a reality TV show. The problem is -- there aren't enough whackos on the station -- we need to add a few more "aggressive personalities" to liven up the show.

    Although a few hot-babes wrestling with each other in Zero-Gee should be interesting TV, that's for sure.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Let's do a benefit concert! by rf0 · · Score: 1


      Where's Michael Jackson when you need him?

      Probably either in court or in bed

      Rus

    2. Re:Let's do a benefit concert! by ettlz · · Score: 1
      Well, there won't be snow in outer space this Christmas. Thank God it's them instead of me.

      "I'm A Celebrity, Get Me Down From Here!" anyone? I'm sure Bono and Bob Geldof should be willing to do their bit.

      And do the hot babes have to be wrestling each other?

  36. Who ate all the pies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "An independent team is looking into how the food inventory ended up being tracked so poorly and how it can be improved in the future."

    Looks like they have one Mr. H Simpson aboard!
    Mmmmm space doughnuts... Woohoo! I've lost 95lbs! Woohoo! Mmmmm freeze dried christmas cake... mmm... Woohoo I'm still 0lbs!

    Just don't let him get at the ant colony.

    1. Re:Who ate all the pies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'ho ate all the pies?
      'ho ate all the pies?
      You fat bastard! You fat bastard! You ate all the pies!

      Oi!

  37. there is no measureable total weight loss by dominux · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    there is a bit lost as heat, e=mc^2 and all that, but the humans are converting edible food, into non edible waste. The weight of the food+humans+waste is constant. Apart from that the weight of an orbiting object is pretty irrelevant unless it is very very big. (like a twin planet system)

    1. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a bit lost as heat, e=mc^2 and all that

      I haven't done physics for a good many years now but I thought there was an equation depending on the different type of energy. e=mc^2 refers to nuclear energy (where c is the speed of light). Heat energy is e=mc(delta(T)) (where c is a constant specific to the objects transfering heat (?)). Kinetic energy is e=0.5*mv^2 etc.

    2. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by dominux · · Score: 1

      the total energy equivalent of a body at rest (or in freefall like the ISS) is the mass times speed of light squared. Energy emitted as heat loss from ISS reduces it's total mass by not very much. Nothing else leaves ISS (as far as I know) they don't jetteson waste. Mass does not leave ISS in any form other than energy, hence e=mc^2 is the only equation relevant to mass loss, however c^2 is pretty big so the mass loss is pretty small.

    3. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it will be more understandable if you calculate for the variable which we're talking about:

      mass = energy / (c^2)

      Energy is being emitted from the ISS, and thus it is losing weight. But, since c^2 is a Really Big Number, the loss in mass is less than we can really detect.

      Besides, I'd wager that atmosphere leakage is a far larger source of mass loss.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    4. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by Charvak · · Score: 1

      the mas loss due to e=mc^2 is zero. mass to energy conversion only happens in nuclear reaction not in chemical reaction. since food digestion is chemical reaction there will be no loss of mass.

    5. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by shobadobs · · Score: 1

      No no no no no no no.

      The energy from food, etc, on the space station comes from _chemical_ reactions. Chemical reactions do not involve any change of mass. The practical ones on the space station convert potential energy of some sort or another into things like kinetic energy, heat, and light. This energy can be stored in batteries, chemical bonds, or whatever. Some comes from light, via solar panels.

      For a more graspable example of energy storage involving retrieval of energy without destroying matter, think of springs. You can have a "battery" consisting of a loaded spring, which is controlled via some mechanations to only release its energy in certain amounts for certain intervals. Every once in a while, this "battery" can be recharged by winding the spring back to its loaded state. Is there any conversion of _matter_ to energy? No. The same answer of "no" applies to circuits and the breaking of chemical bonds.

      This type "spring battery" power storage has been used in clocks and watches for a long time.

    6. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by shobadobs · · Score: 1

      e=mc^2? There is no mass being lost at all.

      To say there is mass being lost because of some lost energy is like observing the trees and noting that swaying trees make the wind.

    7. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by Tango42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong. The energy from food is made by breaking chemical bonds - those bonds have potential energy in them. That energy has a mass equal to the energy divided by the speed of light squared - that's very small, but it certainly isn't 0. In a nuclear reaction you have exactly the same thing, but with bonds between nucleons breaking instead - it's just the strong force rather than the EM force. The energy priciples are the same.

    8. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by Charvak · · Score: 1

      No you are wrong.

      That is energy to energy conversion. one form of energy is converted to another form of energy.

      bond energy converted to heat. mass remains constant.

    9. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      In a closed system yes - the ISS is not a closed system. When the astronauts eat, the temperature of the station does not permanently increase. The excess temperature is radiated away - so the energy of the station decreases, so it's mass decreased. It decreases by the mass of the photons being radiated - and don't say photons are massless, they aren't any such thing. They have a rest mass of 0 - they still have mass. (E=hf=mc^2 so the mass of a photon, m=hf/c^2 where h is plank's constant, f is the frequency and c is the speed of light... if i can manipulate formulae in my head, at least)

    10. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by Charvak · · Score: 1

      Holy Cow!!!

      For the sake of argument, I say that the ISS is in thermal equilbrium with the universe hence net energy exchange is zero. Therefore, my highly logical vulcan mind tell me that the ISS will not gain any mass. :)

      Your move.

    11. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      How can the ISS be in thermal equilibrium both before and after the heat increases due to the astronauts eating?

    12. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the energy contained in the food they eat is already part of the stations' mass :) Conservation of Energy. Nothing leaves nor enters the ISS during the "eating" so it doesn't gain any energy(mass).

      SB

    13. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Energy does not equal mass.

    14. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by dominux · · Score: 1

      no it doesn't. It equals mass times the speed of light times the speed of light.

    15. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, something leaves - radiation. I know people around here don't RTFA but at least RTF thread...

    16. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1

      Um.

      Energy is being emitted from the station. Period. It is transmitting RF to ground stations, it is significantly warmer than the surrounding space and is giving off IR and thermal energy, et cetera.

      I KNOW that conversion of energy from one form to another doesn't involve a loss, but the station IS losing energy, and energy IS mass.

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    17. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by shobadobs · · Score: 1

      Energy is not mass. And writing "Period" cannot strengthen an argument that runs counter to facts. If you think that transmitting electromagnetic radiation means that an object is losing mass, then stop trying to argue and go look up the physics for yourself.

    18. Re:there is no measureable total weight loss by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 1
      Energy is not mass.
      Did you even bother reading my original post before responding to it? Because it appears you need a refresher course on Relativity.

      Firstly, yes. Energy is mass. In fact, as I pointed out in my first post, the relation is that Energy = Mass * C^2, or that Mass = Energy / C^2. So when you are transmitting electriomagnetic radiation, you are losing a mass, because the two are one and the same. Again, as I pointed out in my first post, this is a pittance because C^2 is a Really Big Number, and the loss of mass from atmospheric leakage dwarfs it, but it's there.

      Second, writing that 'writing "Period" cannot strengthen an arguement that runs counter to facts' cannot strengthen an arguement that runs counter to facts. Please, know what you're talking about before you talk.
      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
  38. Tell me this isn't serious... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know April is still quite far off, but just look at it:

    ``NASA and the Russian Space Agency were stunned to learn last week that the astronauts had begun digging into the 45-day food reserve -- which exists to protect against a delayed supply shipment -- in mid-November.''

    Do they seriously mean that:

    1. The astronauts weren't supplied with enough food
    2. The situation was so bad they had to dig into the reserves
    3. They didn't tell Earth about this?

    If this is how seriously the people involved take their mission, I say we cut the funding right here, right now.

    I've never been able to see space flight as anything but a waste of time, energy and money, but I've been okay with it; other people have lives and opinions too. But time and time again it turns out they don't do it properly. Exploding rockets and space shuttles, confusing metric and imperial units, failed Mars missions, and now this.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  39. Re:Sick joke... by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

    i thought it imploded, not "blew up"

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  40. Question seeking an honest answer by Doomsdaisy · · Score: 1

    Does this spacesuit make me look fat? I mean, seriously? Space travel always makes me feel soooooo bloated.

    --
    These are breasts; this is source code.
    Why do you have a problem with those two things belonging to one person?
  41. Once again Russia bails America out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where would you be without them?

  42. Raiding the fridge... by borud · · Score: 1

    I guess someone has been raiding the fridge at the ISS.

    1. Re:Raiding the fridge... by R.Caley · · Score: 2, Funny

      They should never have included those suspicious looking brownies in the last supply run.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
  43. Thats the way it goes.... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

    ...when you can't sleep and raid the fridge every night ;)


    Seriosly thought, What worries me the most isn't that they have started eating of the reserves - because thats why you have reserves - but that it took so long for people to notice.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:Thats the way it goes.... by melandy · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it just took a while for NASA to figure out what spin to put on the story. You don't think they tell us about everything that goes wrong as soon as it happens, do you?

  44. can they? by GerbilSocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any possibilities of them reconstituting their own poop?

    1. Re:can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is a funny question, but in all seriousness, where does all our food go percentagewise?

      If I eat 1 pound of hamburger where does all the mass end up?

      feces: .6 pounds
      urine: .2 pounds
      fat: .1 pounds
      sweat, spit, breath moisture, other: .1 pounds?

      If we had the technology, couldn't we put the molecules back together again?

    2. Re:can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be a long time before we can put something the size of The Biodome in orbit. And even that project failed to be a closed system. We will need to perfect this before going to Mars.

    3. Re:can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This stuff is covered in biology 101 kiddo. A lot of the food you eat gets broken down and converted into heat and you can't get that back without violated the second law.

    4. Re:can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      feces: .6 pounds

      Lightweight.

    5. Re:can they? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the pound is a measurement of weight on earths gravity. Whay you needed to do is put in in grams which is a measurement in mass which is much helpful in space.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  45. You're making this WAY too easy by upside · · Score: 4, Funny

    Must ... resist ... comment ... about English food.

    I'm proud of myself, but the effort at self-restraint gave me a headache.

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    1. Re:You're making this WAY too easy by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Go on then... and while you are there, tell us where you had it.

    2. Re:You're making this WAY too easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about - anywhere south of Sheffield. Nobody south of Sheffield can cook, unless they're Chinese or Indian. North of Sheffield, on the other hand, the food's great.

    3. Re:You're making this WAY too easy by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I went to a good pub in Surrey. Ordered a very nice full roast. The yorshires were well made and fluffy. The gravy was hot, the meat was tender and not overcooked, and the steamed veg was very nicely done.

      But clearly you've tried every restaurant south of Sheffield, and I just managed to get the one exception.

    4. Re:You're making this WAY too easy by upside · · Score: 1

      Relax. I spent 5 years in the South East. Experienced university cafeterias, restaurants, pubs, chippies, takeaways, you name it.

      It wasn't bad, just didn't like things like fried kidney on my breakfast plate.

      Miss the Indian food. A lot. There's a place called The Guru in Old Woking you should visit. Also, Sunday roast with a pint in a countryside pub on a crisp winter day. Don't forget the horse raddish and English mustard. Oh, and tinned beans aren't the same anywhere else in the world.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    5. Re:You're making this WAY too easy by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      That's the thing, maybe we eat a lot of stuff that people aren't use to (although the French eat similar things).

      Indian food is great. Don't know Woking, but Indian food in Birmingham and London is particularly good.

      No-one does a breakfast like we do, either.

      If a Frenchman or Italian wants to criticise our cuisine, fair enough. But the food in most of the world is no better than food in England.

  46. I wonder how long you could survive on by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    Whey and flax oil powder? Maybe some vitimins too.

    Maybe I'll try it myself. If my blog goes a bit quiet consider it failed

    1. Re:I wonder how long you could survive on by builderbob_nz · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the flax where you come from, but native NZ flax gum/oil will give you a bad case of the trots. The early Maoris used it as a laxitive.

      --

      Karma? Hey I just call it as I see it.
    2. Re:I wonder how long you could survive on by tqft · · Score: 1

      time to check out the science experiments

      Gagh!
      http://www.desc.med.vu.nl/NL-taxi/ICE/ICE -page1.ht m

      Run the Klingons are here!!!

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
  47. From Space Quest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, what they really need is a Space Bar.

  48. They blame the previous crew by ceeam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The previous crew has apparently eaten all the meat and tasties. All is left in abundance now is some confectionery and some juices if I recall correctly what I read yesterday. Now you see - when your mom was telling you to eat it all and not to pick your food she, in fact, was preparing you to be a spaceman one day.

  49. For an english assignment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I drew a cartoon of an astronaut falling with an explosion in the background with the caption "*tzzk Uh mission control ... that was a Bud Light."

  50. Re:Eat poop by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's like the British astronaut who was visiting the Mir space station and asked the resident Russian cosmonauts what they did for entertainment. "Oh, we have a bottle of vodka," said one of the Russkies. "Would you like a shot?" The Brit took a swig from the bottle. "It tastes a bit weak," he remarked, "I expected real Russian vodka to have a bit more kick!" "Well," said one of the Russians, "It's been through each of us six times already!"

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  51. Re:Sick joke... by b0r0din · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey I know the Iraqi Information Minister's second cousin. I mean, he's my second cousin. And he's fucking hilarious. Get it straight, man. Stop spreading disinformation on the Internet, the one place everyone can find tons of true, undisputed facts. The one place on earth (aside from Iraq of course) I am truly at home.

    - Iraqi Information Minster

    P.S. Iraq rules, long live Saddam! America will never defeat Iraq! Baghdad will never be taken! Death to the Infidels, and...

    Shit, gotta go.

  52. Replicators failed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't we just beam them a new replicator or the parts needed to repair the one they have? Scotty could've fixed the problem in a couple of days.

  53. Re:Sick joke... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    The only thing crashing and burning around here is your non-hilarious sense of humor. Ever see the neighbor guy in "Raising Arizona" try to tell the Polish joke?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  54. Other headlines... by Netsensei · · Score: 0

    "The executive board at NASA has *finally* agreed to screen manned space flight recruits for boulemia" "Russian scientists take a look at cannibalism as a viable option to sustain a manned mission to Mars"

  55. GO have a look at the specs by tqft · · Score: 1

    ...it's an airtight tin can with lots of heavy attachment points.

    Heavy attachmnet points for what?

    Original specs called for lots of solar panels.

    Lots and lots.

    As a test base for for a Solar Power Satellite.

    Guess King Coal didn't want that.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
  56. No need to be hysterical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They may have a food shortage providing that the cargo ship DOES NOT arrive before the middle of January. The chances of that are low, sending Russian cargo ships to ISS has been a routing procedure for a long time.

    It good they have a backup plan in case if something extraordinary does happen but at this time there's nothing to worry about.

    1. Re:No need to be hysterical by NiteHaqr · · Score: 1

      A routing procedure????

      Maybe NASA should call in Cisco or Juniper for some advice.....

      Raise a TAC case !!!

  57. Hidden agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if a Russian cargo vessel scheduled to arrive on Dec. 25 has a mishap or is significantly delayed, the astronauts, one American and one Russian, will have to abandon the station and return home months ahead of schedule

    "Abandon the station", yeah right! He means they'll be eaten by the other astronauts!

  58. new mother's saying... by nigham · · Score: 3, Funny

    finish your food kiddo... there are hungry astronauts in space.

    --
    I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
  59. Yeah, the brilliant russian engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't praise Russian technology unless you had to deal with it yourself. I had a russian car once, Moskvich, and it needed like 4 hours of maintenance each month to stay roadworthy. Of course that was ~8 years ago. Maybe they make their millitary stuff more reliable, but the all the stuff they made for civilians was utter and complete crap. Car salesmen here say 10 years old german car is better than a new russian car even now.

    I got to work with some of old (70s-80s) russian computers too some ~15 years ago. They were 1:1 copies of some stuff americans used to make 5-10 years earlier. There was a joke that some engineers from USA went to computer exhibition to Moscow to see russian computers, and were able to log on to them with their own passwords (because software was 100% stolen).

    --Coder

    1. Re:Yeah, the brilliant russian engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Sour grapes. The USA can't get into space without the Russians anymore. It's all about how you use it. Once they've scrapped the shuttles the Russians will be the only real manned space power again.

    2. Re:Yeah, the brilliant russian engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moskvich isn't really a Russian car, it was originaly an Opel. Yes, much of the USSR tech were clones (yay BK-0010!), but the software wansn't all cloned. Anyway, there was some incredible USSR tech, usually where KISS priciples where applied: in those cases it was simple, reliable and did it's job.

    3. Re:Yeah, the brilliant russian engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I know, but Moskvich is as russian as it gets. I know Moskvich was Opel (mine was made in Izhevsk, they also had a factory in Moscow), Lada (Zhiguli) was Fiat. Early Izh motorcycles were copies of german bikes made before and during world war II. Oh, maybe VAZ (Volga) was more russian :) I don't know how they got the factory for VAZ, maybe they built this one themselves. And forget Zaporozhec (ZAZ), with these things you need 2 engines- one to use in the car, the other to repair during your free time, so that you can switch them when the one you're driving breaks down.

      Yay BK-0010. Although I only saw a few of these in CS classes in middle school. What were they clones of? Z-80? Instruction set was quite familar as far as I remember. There was this game 'Klad' (engl. 'Treasure'), are there any clones of it that run on modern PCs?

      I know a lot of software was original, but the russian mainframe I was familar with ran RSX-11M (or how is it called) and the mainframe was a clone of PDP-11.

      Heh, about KISS. I own a Ford Scorpio now (made by Ford Europe, probably assembled in Germany), and in many places (esp. suspension) SIMLPLER solutions are applied than those in Russian Moskvich. And it is much more reliable.

      I agree that there was some incredible USSR tech. Soyuz is one of examples. Problem is, I didn't get to see much of it.

      --Coder

    4. Re:Yeah, the brilliant russian engineering by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Dude, you've got to do better than that. Obviously the Russians did not do well at all when it came to the civilian products. The problem was simple: there was NO competition whatsoever. The difference for the millitary and the space technology was infinite: competition with the capitalist countries of the world.

      Russians had to compete with the States for example in the space exploration and in the war preparation.

      Moscvitch, Volga, Zaporojets, Lada, etc... those were no competition to each other, they were in defficit, so they did not compete with each other, you bought what you could get. Foreign cars were almost completely absent in the civilian market.

      Now, trucks on the other hand, something like Ural was sold into other countries and had to compete with others so those are very good.

  60. Re:Sick joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the spaceshuttle Columbia walks into a bar.

    bartender goes: Why so down?

    "I just broke up with my crew"

  61. Gastronomy by jhalme · · Score: 1

    "...including some Asian delicacies -- dim sum dumplings for Chiao ... and fried rice for Sharipov"
    Ah, so they are both gastronauts!

  62. Why Base it on Calories? by syntap · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't we all know by now it's the CARBS that count and not calories?

    My best sig is this one.

    1. Re:Why Base it on Calories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's not true. It is calories that are important. Where the Atkins Diet succeeds is not by reducing carbs but increasing intake of protein which acts as an appetite suppressant thus reducing calories.

    2. Re:Why Base it on Calories? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's not true. It is calories that are important. Where the Atkins Diet succeeds is not by reducing carbs but increasing intake of protein which acts as an appetite suppressant thus reducing calories.

      The Atkins diet works by putting your body in a state called ketosis, in which your brain runs on ketones instead of glucose, and in which you do not store fat. Your body will consume fat first, and the rate of lean muscle loss is slowed. As you are not taking in [much] carbohydrates, you will not be storing them as fat either. Consequently you typically lose fat very rapidly.

      You consume protein because if you take away carbs all you have left is protein, fat, and fiber. It's kind of hard to make a satisfying meal out of only the latter two. You are supposed to get plenty of fiber, however; green salads are an excellent way to accomplish this.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Why Base it on Calories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ketosis is only part of it. Ketosis occurs because there are no carbs to consume but to reduce wieght, the overall calorific intake has to be reduced. That is where the protein, acting as an appetite suppressant comes in. See http://www.weightlossforall.com/diet-high-protein. htm and http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3416637.stm

    4. Re:Why Base it on Calories? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's what the previous astronauts were doing.

      "Russian officials, quoted in the local media, have accused the previous crew of overeating during their 6-month mission earlier this year, leaving a deficit of meat and milk and a surplus of juice and confectionery"

      --
    5. Re:Why Base it on Calories? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ketosis is only part of it. Ketosis occurs because there are no carbs to consume but to reduce wieght, the overall calorific intake has to be reduced. That is where the protein, acting as an appetite suppressant comes in.

      You are 100% wrong. You can consume more calories than you need during ketosis provided they are calories from fat and not from carbs, because during ketosis, unused fat is not stored in the body, but simply expelled as waste. You can eat 4,000 calories a day on the atkins diet, and as long as they're all from fat, you'll lose weight. I ate well more than 2,500 calories a day and lost 90 lb in nine months while sitting on my ass and not exercising.

      Your appetite is suppressed because over time you become more sensitive to glucose again, and it takes less to make you feel full. If you're not riding the insulin rollercoaster all the time, you won't feel so hungry when it's been a while since you've had carbohydrates.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Why Base it on Calories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can believe what you want but studies have shown that contrary to what Dr. Atkins claimed calories are not expelled as waste.

    7. Re:Why Base it on Calories? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You can believe what you want but studies have shown that contrary to what Dr. Atkins claimed calories are not expelled as waste.

      First of all, Ketosis was around before Atkins utilized it. People have used this diet for ages to control seizures, which [typically] cannot happen absent the presence of glucose.

      Second of all, a calorie is a measurement of energy; in addition, as we have it here, a calorie is actually a kcal. Regardless, you would say grams of fat or something. However, studies have not shown anything of the sort. Ketosis is a fairly well-known process, if misunderstood by dieticians and some physicians who confuse it with ketoacidosis, a dangerous condition in diabetics in which ketones build up in the body.

      You can say what you like, O Coward, but you clearly still don't know what you're talking about (calories, expelled? please.) and besides that your assertions are incorrect. My own experience and the experience of thousands backs up the medical understanding of ketosis. I realize the plural of anecdote is not data but this isn't all anecdotal, though my experience is - studies have shown that the Atkins diet works. What they have not shown is the long-term health effects, which you may malign at will.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  63. UK VODKA SUCKS by Shadow_139 · · Score: 1

    That vodka was probably 500% better then any thing you get in England.

    And there shots are *HALF* the size of Irish one's......

    -----
    "Clutch my testes, bloody squirrel humpers!!" -Happy Noodle Boy

  64. it was ok when they were just screwing up robots. by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

    NASA probably mixed up metric and imperial again, someone looked at a list and saw 50 100g packets of food and went 'oh look, 50 100oz packets of food no need to send any more'

  65. food for thought by toeztocy2003 · · Score: 1

    Little green aliens stole it..just kidding..giggles..Isnt there a way to grow your own veggies n fruit in space?we age quicker up there right,so why cant food grow quicker there to....I dont know....sounds fishy to me like someone wants this station out of order..No one to run it leaves it unprotected..there could be a master plan to all of this..Im sure if I was in space Id make sure I had enough food to last me during my trip....

  66. Caloric Restriction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually, cutting calories is not such a bad thing. When done in a nutritionally sound manner, it's been shown to extend lifespan in many species. Of course, the evidence for extending human lifespan has yet to be borne out.

    The Caloric Restriction Society discusses news and tips about this type of dieting.

  67. Re:Sick joke... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 0, Troll

    This coming from a guy who corrects the jokes that teenagers tell? LMFAO, and not at any jokes.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. Call Truly Nolan! by scharkalvin · · Score: 0

    Maybe the food shortage was caused by a serious
    roach problem?

  70. Africa by RasendeRutje · · Score: 1

    Please do not forget that not only in the space ship, but also in some regions of Africa, people are starving from hunger!
    The costs for bringing those few in space some food could save millions of lives in Africa.

    --

    If Microsoft was mass, stupidity would be gravity.
    1. Re:Africa by TheLink · · Score: 1

      The main reason those people are starving is not the lack of money or food.

      While the IMF and friends might be partly responsible, most of the problems are self-inflicted. There's a limit you can go with blaming the whites - since a higher proportion of the formerly colonized non-African countries are doing much better.

      "The destruction of much of Zimbabwe's agricultural base through the seizing of mainly white-owned farms throughout 1999 and 2000 has ruined the Zimbabwean economy".

      In Sudan, the Government bombs their own people (or people in their country they'd rather not be their people - sure looks like state-sanctioned genocide): "The armed forces of Sudan frequently bomb civilian targets including hospitals and feeding sites".

      Yep, they bomb places where humanitarian organizations are distributing food to their own (unwanted) citizens. Nice eh?

      Saddam Hussein is "good" in contrast to many of the leaders in Africa. Gaddafi is probably a saint in comparison (he's mellowed a lot in past years - he might even be going benevolent dictator...!).

      I suppose if the Africans succeed in wiping themselves out (with disease[1] and genocide), there wouldn't be future generations who'd still insist on killing each other. And thus there wouldn't be millions of Africans dying each year.

      [1] It appears that many African men believe they can be cured of HIV if they have sex with a virgin - so they go and rape young girls.

      --
  71. Space Weed by tie_fightertk069 · · Score: 1

    "looking into how the food inventory ended up being tracked so poorly" Two words: Space Weed. Someone has been putting that hydroponics rig to use up there me thinks.

    1. Re:Space Weed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My pot growing experiences are severly limited. How would they do in low gravity?

    2. Re:Space Weed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the buds could become quite big in zero-g. :)

  72. Sorry, thats a Myth by bjomo · · Score: 3, Informative

    While the Fisher space pen did require a large sum of money to develop, NASA had nothing to do with the development. In fact, NASA also used pencils before the space pen was available.

    This is just like the story of one of the very first modal imapact hammers. A modal impact hammer is used for vibration testing. It contains a force transducer in the head of the hammer so you can measure the excitation force applied to the structure you are hitting with it. Anyway, it one of these efforts to trim the fat on government spending (ie. $10,000 toilet seat type stuff), they were attacking the use of a $5,000 hammer. It turned out to be a $5 hammer and a $4,995 force transducer! So try getting the facts straight before you go spouting off so you don't end up with egg on your face like those guys.

    Also, the Fisher space pen did not have a pump. It contains an ink that when at rest is too thick to squeeze around the roller ball of the pen. However, when the ball is in motion the shearing force applied to the ink allows the ink to flow and the user to write.

  73. Could the inventory problem have been... by Zemplar · · Score: 1

    "An independent team is looking into how the food inventory ended up being tracked so poorly and how it can be improved in the future."

    Was the food inventory kept on a MySQL database? Maybe even an Access one?

  74. Inventory check! by BinaryCodedDecimal · · Score: 1

    I can almost hear it...

    - 140,000 rehydratable chickens.
    - Check.
    - 72 tons of reconstituted sausage pate.
    - Check.
    - 4,691 irradiated haggis.
    - Oh, Commander, it's Saturday night. I've had enough!
    - 4,691 irradiated haggis.
    - Commander, it's Saturday night! I want to boogie on down!
    - 4,691 irradiated haggis.
    - We've been doing this for four hours! Let's have a break!
    - 4,691 irradiated hag-g-gis.
    - Commander, will you stop saying 4,981 irradiated haggis and speak to me!
    - 4,691 irradiated haggis.
    - Commander, I want to go for a *drink*!
    - 4,691 irradiated haggis!
    - I want to have some fun!
    - This *is* fun! Are you mad?

    1. Re:Inventory check! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      woo for red dwarf :)

  75. Re:Sick joke... by stanmann · · Score: 1

    [pedant]
    This of course is a Challenger joke retreaded for the recent incident
    [/pedant]

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  76. metric/imperial by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it's some kind of units problem: "Hey Bud, sez here they wants us to load 75 Kg of rice. Kg's is the same as pounds ain't they?".

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  77. Obligatory José Jimenez joke by Dammital · · Score: 2, Funny
    Live at the Hungry i, circa 1961 --
    Q: I would imagine that food is a major problem on a trip into outer space...

    A: ... it is, you know! They only allow you to have the ten ounces of food.

    Q: Only ten ounces?

    A: Yah.

    Q: Well, how will you manage?

    A: I'll eat out...

  78. Hunger Strike by thewiz · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the astronauts are upset that NASA screwed up the food supply, they could always rebel and go on a hunger strike.
    Uh, wait..That's what NASA wants them to do...

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  79. There's obviously still some issues by Corellon+Larethian · · Score: 1

    to be worked out before NASA is allowed back into space. I know all of these guys choose to take the risks; no one is drafted into the American space program. And I have no doubt there are competent engineers working for NASA.

    I find it most likely it's the people with Business Administration degrees, and not the Mechanical Engineers, where the problem needs to be addressed.

    Swap out the CEO. There's thousands more just like him, so pick a better breed.

  80. Not entirely true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He estimated there is enough food to last seven to 14 days beyond Christmas Day, after which there will be nothing left.

    I know a high-level manager in the ISS operations contract, who tells me that the ISS crew has an onboard supply of "snack food" - twinkies and the like. What will run out in 14 days is the nutritious food that's designed, along with lots of exercise, to keep their bodies from wasting away. So "nothing left" is a bit of an exaggeration. The crew wouldn't starve to death in January, but their bodies would begin to lose muscle and bone mass at an accelerating rate. The plan is that if 16P - the next Progress mission - doesn't dock by the 30th of December, then they'll bring the crew home.

  81. My crew mate is looking rather tasty right now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cartoon of the people turning into food on a life boat come to mind.

    In seriousness, I wonder when the first cannibalism will occur in space due to a stranded interstellar space vessel... You know it's going to happen some day.

  82. Spaceballs ref. by Vague+but+True · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they call LoneStar and Barf to see if they can pick up some takeout from the planet Druidia?

    --

    I'm not a doctor, but I play one in bed.

  83. Brussel Sprouts are Delicious by NardofDoom · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You're just not cooking them properly.

    Steamed with a little butter and salt is best. And if you can't take the big ones, buy the frozen baby brussel sprouts. They have less of the flavor compounds that many (particularly those weaned on baby food and sweets) find distasteful.

    This has been another off-topic post.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    1. Re:Brussel Sprouts are Delicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over yourself, some people can taste the sharp, bitter flavor of brussels sprouts and others don't, or don't to the same degree.

      Imagine how they'd taste in a sauce made of orange juice and toothpaste, and that's what they taste like to some people, like me. No matter how perfectly they've been prepared.

    2. Re:Brussel Sprouts are Delicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I _like_ the sharp flavour of raw or VERY lightly stir-fried brussels sprouts. People who boil them until they are mushy and smell of babies' nappies should NOT DO THAT.

  84. Well, gee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government projects never are misplanned. Never.

  85. Thanks, Ruby Rhod by JPelorat · · Score: 1

    But since their own flight doctors are not spazzing about it, I think it's safe to say that they'll probably be ok for a few more weeks...

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  86. Re:Sick joke... by SunPin · · Score: 1

    English is your second language, right?

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  87. Whoops! by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    "Dammit Vladimir, you forgot to go to the grocery store again!"

    Hmm if I was one of the astronauts, I would seriously be cutting my calories even more to help avoid any chance of having to come back home... not that I have any problem with mother russia...i mean mother earth, but space is just too damn cool!

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  88. Golden Corral Space Pod? by murreyaw · · Score: 0

    They should have hooked up the Golden Corral Space Pod on that thing.

    --
    God, Root, Whats the difference?
  89. this is an ontopic post speaking to the astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO SOUP FOR YOU!

  90. entree, roast chicken, hot by whovian · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with their food replicator?

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  91. Food tracking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "An independent team is looking into how the food inventory ended up being tracked so poorly and how it can be improved in the future."

    Is it really poor food tracking or is it the fact that people eat alot more when they are bored? ;-)

  92. I've seen and heard this story... by constantnormal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... from many "news" outlets.

    It is uniformly described as a "diet" or "cutback".

    Will someone please explain to me why no one is willing to use the term "forced rationing"? As that certainly seems to be the most accurate description from the high peak of reason and sensibility where I reside...

    Or maybe the "news" is not about presenting "accurate description"s.

    1. Re:I've seen and heard this story... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      Will someone please explain to me why no one is willing to use the term "forced rationing"? As that certainly seems to be the most accurate description from the high peak of reason and sensibility where I reside...

      Because the astronaut and cosmonant have always been on "forced rationing." It's just that the ration was more generous before, while the Shuttle was still carrying part of the supply load.

      It's not like they can call Domino's for delivery now, can they?

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    2. Re:I've seen and heard this story... by rark · · Score: 1

      they are cutting 5-10% of 3000kcal/day, in other words, they are putting them on (at worst) at 2700kcal/day diet. That's hardly forced rationing.

  93. Uhm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since when was giving up EVER the right answer?

    You're a failure in life. You might as well kill your self now.

  94. Cue Johann Strauss' Blue Danube by Invulnerable+Bede · · Score: 0

    - Open refrigerator doors, Hal.
    - I'm sorry, Dave. I can't let you eat that.

  95. next generation soyuz seats six by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The Russians have a six-seater in production.
    The Chinese have leased the Soyuz design for their manned space program. Early remarks point to adding more functionality than capacity. It would be usefule if they installed ISS ports on their models.

    1. Re:next generation soyuz seats six by orac2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Chinese didn't lease the Soyuz design: at one point they tried to purchase a Soyuz for reverse-engineering purposes, but the only thing the Russians were willing to supply for the price was a capsule stripped of almost all its systems.

      While obviously Soyuz inspired, the Chinese design is home grown and features a number of design improvements over the Soyuz: it's larger, and most notably, the orbital module is, unlike the Soyuz OM, capable of independant flight.

      There's a good article by James Oberg about it in IEEE Spectrum.

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
  96. $45 billion a bed? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    They've spent almost $90 billion so far and cant even providing living resources for two people.

    "Beds" are a figure of speech, because in micro-gravity astronauts sleep in pouches.

  97. Creutzfeldt-Jacobs in space by lazy+genes · · Score: 1

    Can prions exist in space?

  98. zombies! by metachor · · Score: 1

    How long until one crew member goes crazy and eats the other one?

  99. With food like haggis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With food like haggis, it's no wonder the Scots came up with the worlds finest potable.

  100. Lost Inventory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if there is a possibility of the food actually being on board the ISS, but nobody recalling where they stowed it.

  101. Jet's gonna be pissed by MilenCent · · Score: 1

    "These were the emergency rations. Only to be used in a true emergency. They were for the last of the last resort!

    All I want to know is, who took them."

    "I wouldn't leave the box as evidence."

    Mmm... maybe we could fry up some Welsi Corgi?

    (Yeah, so it's an anime reference. But if you're going to refer to anime, refer to the best.)

    1. Re:Jet's gonna be pissed by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      Mmm... maybe we could fry up some Welsi Corgi?

      Nah, just eat some of Ed's mushrooms... you'll dream up plenty of frogs and fish to eat afterwards.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  102. The restaurant at the end of the universe... by MissTuxie · · Score: 1

    Oh come on, they probably saved enough by now to visit Milliways... it's right around the corner.

  103. Jet's gonna be pissed by MilenCent · · Score: 1

    "These were the emergency rations. Only to be used in a true emergency. They were for the last of the last resort!

    All I want to know is, who took them."

    "I wouldn't leave the box as evidence."

    Mmm... maybe we could fry up some Welsh Corgi?

    (Yeah, so it's an anime reference. But if you're going to refer to anime, refer to the best.)

  104. Spliff's in Space? by El_Smack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Upside: No drug laws in space.
    Downside: You still get the munchies.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  105. Ironic by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    30-40 years ago, people were fussing about spending all those billions of dollars to put men in space when there were people starving on earth. Now we face the possibility (hopefully remote) of men starving in space.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  106. Russian Technology - simple works every time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian space technology may be old, but its well-proven and gets the job done. The Russians have not had a single flight fatality in 30 years with Soyuz craft.

    Space is a dangerous environment and there is much to be said for building spacecraft to be as tough as tanks. The other approach, to go all hi-tech, may appear more spectacular but leaves you with little room to hide when things go wrong (see various well-known Shuttle mishaps)

    Take Mir - everyone laughed at how it broke down all the time. But no-one died and it lasted a heck of a lot longer than anyone expected. Not even when it was crashed into by a supply ship and lost air. I can only hope that the fancy ISS proves to be that robust, because it WILL be hit one day.

    Also, astronauts on a diet? Hey, they could do with losing a little weight anyway. Get it? Get it? Ah, ferget it...

  107. They need some by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soylent Green. In the immortal words of Charlton Heston: "Soylent green is people!"

  108. Nonsense by bluGill · · Score: 1

    The real mission for ISS is to keep a lot of smart Russian engineers who know how to build things like ICBMs from working for third world dictators. Nations other than Russia work on it only so they can maintain a fiction that it is an international effort.

    If any science is done that is good, but the point is all politics. Considering what these guys can do if the choice comes down to building a bomb for some evil guy or not eating, I'd call ISS a good thing. Nothing to do with science though.

  109. its Americans what do you expect?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What a shock, fat yanks bastards consume more than thair fair share of available resources and put themselves and everyone else in danger.

    The only joy will be if those blubber bladders are unable to squeeze through the escape hatch and die as a result.

    Hurray!

  110. Looks like it's time to break out the... by Intocabile · · Score: 1

    chips, if there's any way to get back the general publics in NASA it's putting an Average Joe in space.

    I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality I could be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves.
    -Kent Brockman
    The Simpsons

    Truer words were never said Kent.

  111. Yanks? by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    I mean, we've damn near deep-fried as many things as the Brits have.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  112. A Wonderful Pissing Contest by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    > After all, Mir was 10 years over its planned lifetime. Unlike the two space shuttles the US-Americans managed to crash. Not to mention that the Mir crew survived ...

    OK, we're all getting annoyed at both of you. Yes, Mir was a good example of Russian technology. Sure, the crew survived, but that's a bad comparison to the shuttles that failed, due to their failures being accidents. If you want to argue that this means that Americans are behind Russians in space tech, I present that the U.S. never blew a big crater in Cape Canaveral like the Russians managed in Baikonur. Still, space travel has been relatively non-hazardous for both nations, and it doesn't really compare to aviation technology. When you're talking about planes, you should be considering Aeroflot, not Mir.

    It's true that there are many Americans who look down their noses at Russian technology because it isn't the latest and greatest, and that's not always a good idea. Where high tech is necessary (Life-flight helicopters, military hardware and "hostile-zone" places like flying over forest fires and Arctic conditions), the U.S. shines pretty well. Where hard-down reliability is key, the simpler designs win out. As was said above, "the right tool for the job" is important, so there's a place for both.

    Virg

  113. Oooo, loading content! (OT) by khallow · · Score: 1
    I wonder why a kid-oriented website has a "loading content: X%" message. That sounds pretty dumb to me.

    If you count the kid-unfriendly messages, this looks like a close analogy to the ISS.

  114. abbreviated biosphere ii in space by mlinksva · · Score: 1

    For two years, the crew lived inside the hermetically enclosed structure, farming for a living. Serendipitously, the crew could not grow enough plant food to support a calorically normal diet. I assume astronaut health is extremely closely monitored, could provide some good data on short term impact of calorie restriction.

  115. I'll bet it was Dr. Smith! by justsomecomputerguy · · Score: 1

    He was sneaking extra rations again! And when confronted he'll just try to weasel out of responsibility like he did on all the previous episodes of Lost In Space!

  116. Looked like snacking to me by ImWithBrilliant · · Score: 1

    I caught the NASA channel yesterday with the two of them answering questions live from school kids, and they did zero-g somersaults that were not complementary in their jumpsuits.

    One kid's question was about height and weight to be an astronaut, and there was a limit on height, but not weight...

    --

    Is it a rule, that there's an exception to every rule?

    1. Re:Looked like snacking to me by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Pulling 5 Gs, there reaches a point where the seats just aren't designed to handle the stress! ;p

      --
      It's been a long time.
  117. Strictly on a need to eat. by caseyoconnell · · Score: 1

    It is about time that we start seriously questioning our cultural attitudes toward eating. I was watching a monkey yesterday, and his behavior was much more realistic.
    I would like to see some community of thinkers analytically discuss what the dietary needs of a human really are.
    I suggest that for most people a great deal of their calories may be used by parasitic organisms in their intestines including E. coli. Then they would require another portion of those calories to deal with those organisms. This could account for a significant percentage of total dietary intake.

  118. NASA's Official Preflight Checkliist... by severoon · · Score: 1

    I just can't help thinking I left something behind...the oven? Check...the lights? Check...hmm...oh well, I guess I've got everything. Let's go!

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  119. and what about Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great...we can't keep food in someone's stomach two inches away because some idiot doesn't know how to manage inventory...how the hell are we supposed to goto mars when stupid things like this happen all the time?

  120. you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    robots don't eat. Another benefit of a robotic mission.

  121. Well... by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    Well, if you want to get cranky about it, they aren't weightless, they're in free fall around the Earth. Just because their forward motion prevents them from pressing on a scale placed below them doesn't mean they have no representative "weight" while they're in the Earth's gravity well.

    But yeah, mass makes the discussion easier.

    Virg

  122. Mr. Boffo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll never forget the Mr. Boffo comic strip in the '80s.

    He's in space talking with an alien.
    alien: "On my planet, these are a delicacy."
    Mr. Boffo eats it.
    alien: "On my planet, 'delicacy' means poison."

  123. Re:Sick joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >America will never defeat Iraq!

    At least he got that part right.

  124. commercial space travel by Fry-kun · · Score: 1

    They should just ask SpaceShipOne to deliver some food :)
    In the future that may actually be possible

    --
    Did you know that "FTW" ("for the win") is a direct translation of "Sieg Heil"?
  125. Give OSS jingoism a rest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, for the love of $deity, this is an administrative failure, not a software failure!

    "Perhaps if the software were revamped, and open source software used instead the community could help out a little?"

    It doesn't matter who makes the accounting software if humans don't act on the information. OSS does nothing to change this.

    "Many eyes make for few bugs -- and when the bugs are as easy to spot as the "food" entry reading zero I see no reason to put up with badly written, unfree software."

    Actually, if food=zero, and you haven't got a mission already in space, your astronauts are probably as good as dead. You obviously didn't consider the lead time to prepare a resupply mission; in failing to account for appropriate mission parameters, your proposal as stated could have killed two people. Think about that, then consider why OSS development isn't even in contention for aerospace software.

    OSS is not a magic wand that solves all ills. It has a valuable place, but crying "use OSS" every time some problem even vaguely related to computers pops up is absurd, and just makes OSS advocates look like a bunch of obsessive zealots. Please stop.

  126. Band Aid 2004: Space Station Aid by syousef · · Score: 1

    So this is Christmas,
    And what have we done,
    American's in Space suits,
    Look for Russians to come...

    Feed the Astronaunts...Do they know its Christmas time at all?

    Please give generously. In Soviet America no one can hear you starve.

    Hmmm this is a bit of a turnaround. American's waiting on Russian food relief. :-)

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  127. Re:Sick joke... by dasuridai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know everyone loves to joke on the former Iraqi Information Minister, but am I the only one that is reminded of Rumsfeld and the rest saying 'there is no organized gorilla resistance in Iraq'?

  128. Lack of Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you want to do today Bob? I don't know Ivan, how about we eat and then float around.

  129. Recycle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they recycle their waste water... why not their food?

  130. American Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    With the American president worried about teaching creationism in school, denying global warming, and relying on badly designed voting machines what do you expect?

    An investment in science with a nation that might be part of the axis of evil for buying Saddam's oil and not doing war on him?

    By the way. Not much science is going on in the ISS but the "how astronauts degrade with no gravity and maybe cosmic rays we didn't discover yet". Perhaps the americans just planned it so Russia would waste more money than them on the ISS?

    I worship Russian engineering. Competence in making low maintenance thingies actually counts to keep a job in Russia, not just lots of clean weekly reviews.

  131. Eat your vegetables, Johnny by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Funny

    motherly order a the dining table:
    "Now Johnny, finish your vegetables. Don't you know the astronauts on the space station don't have enought to eat?"

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  132. Re:I wonder how long you could survive on 3000 C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The space station food budget is 3000 Calories per astronaut per day. On Earth, the average adult needs less than 2000 Calories to maintain their ideal body weight.

    The astronauts are being asked to cut back 10% from their 3000 Calorie / day food intake. Now, remember, these people are weightless, so they are burning *less* Calories than they would on earth. So I wouldn't say they are in danger of starving or anything....

    If anything, they are in danger of becoming lard-asses.

  133. This is why we must support manned space flight by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 0, Troll

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

    6.

    7.

    8.

    9.

    and of course,

    10.

  134. It's their own damn fault by Media+Withdrawal · · Score: 1

    We have centuries of management science to help us with problems like that.

    Yes, and "Management Science" in practice mostly boils down to the art of dodging blame. The 'nauts got themselves into this mess by agreeing to this mission, and they will definitely get themselves out well before they have a chance to starve.

    I've provisioned and sailed small boats several thousand miles at a stretch with a crew of 2. No long-range radio, no mission control, no layers of scientific managers to obscure the blame. When our water went bad on one occasion (yes it was our fault), we literally bet our lives on our limited backup rations and our next course of action.

    It's not that complicated. Don't get in the vessel until you have verified it's adequately provisioned and you are ready to accept the consequences of any single point failure. Including getting your butt home intact once you're done being a "consummate professional" who "will do whatever is required and asked of" you by a scientifically managed NASA flight surgeon (quoted in the article).

    If this situation worsens in any way, future crew members can look forward to each tracking the entire food inventory independently, with daily reconciliations and periodic video audits by ground control. And it will be their own damn fault. Some people will put up with anything to fly.

    1. Re:It's their own damn fault by mwood · · Score: 1

      Well, I wasn't talking about the sort of voodoo "management science" you see in Dilbert, but real methodologies for making as certain as possible that important things have been (a) identified, and (b) provided for in the schedules and procedures.

      NASA does seem to have a problem with treating astronauts the way that airlines treat pilots or navies treat ships' commanders. I guess the situation is waiting for someone with the sand to send a note saying, "sorry, this bird will not lift until the following problems are squared away. By order of the captain." Too many inspections and decisions are made by people who won't be going.

      Yes, a space mission is hideously complex. So was taking a ship out of contact with civilization for months at a time, yet one person (who *was* going) saw that it all got done and made the final decision. Despite knowing far less about what would or could happen than we know about manned space flight today, those ships usually came back.

  135. Re:Sick joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that most of the zoo animals in Iraq, especially the primates, suffered terribly due to the privations of the last decade or so, I suspect that any gorillas who may live in Iraq who survived until today would be pretty happy with the improved availability of food.

    Given said hypothetical gorillas seeking the assistance of humans in Iraq, it's entirely possible that some of them would meet up with guerilla resistance forces, organized or not, and by joining them, institute a guerilla gorilla resistance.

    But not likely.

  136. They do have two, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One is the escape pod the other ye old trash bin. From my memory of the Orbiter simulator, there are three docking ports. With two escape craft attached you have a resupply nightmare, X% of cargo on the resupply being packing materials needing shunted to the trash pod before it's released. Thus causeing a loss of trash payload, or a personal hazard not having six seats available at any given moment.

  137. Rocket scientists by Scud · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, let's see, a crash due to a conversion error. Now an addition problem that threatens to beat the heck out of the South Beach Diet (The "Orbiter's" diet?).

    Not to mention a failed burn attempt to raise the ISS to a higher orbit.

    http://www.spacetoday.net/Summary/2651

    Maybe it's a good thing that we aren't all rocket scientists.

    --
    I dream in binary.
  138. Good ol' Leroy by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

    I remember Leroy Chiao well -- he was my stepdad's roommate at UCSB. Great guy. ^^; He seems to have put on some weight though.

    I'd be interested in knowing who it was that ate too much. XD

  139. Re:Sick joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you even have one?

  140. Further downside by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    Downside 2: You can't open the window even though you are doing 90,000 miles an hour and REALLY want to tilt your hand up and down in the wind.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  141. Pretty Obvious what's going on here... by IronGeek · · Score: 1

    I can just see the Russian cosmonaut, gliding along a corridor, clipboard clutched under his arm, "Okay, I haf new data to examine, comrade-" He then arrives at the storage hold, finding the American floating like the Goodyear blimp above a pawed at casement of space-doughnuts, cheeks smeared with chocolate... "Damning it, you are again eating all of supplies!! You will be death of me, American goat-pig!!" PS- Go ahead & flame me; I'm American! lol

  142. Re:Sick joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't know about the "Oil for Gorilla-food" scandal? Millions of dollars in oil was sold each year to feed the Iraqi's with bananas, but the bananas were instead funneled to zoos to feed the hungry gorillas. The gorillas loved living like silverback gorilla-kings during the Iraq sanctions, but now are said to be sadly depressed after the end of the "Oil for Gorilla-food" program.