Slashdot Mirror


Future Samsung Phone Plans Leaked

djgil writes "Looks like Samsung needs to be more careful what they do with their powerpoints. A number of prototype Samsung phones have appeared online including three that used Windows Mobile. One phone uses a 500Mhz processor and other had a 3Gbyte Hard Drive for music."

258 comments

  1. Mobile envy by SIGALRM · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Samsung "B-Bop"
    400 MHz Processor, 128 MB ROM, 64 MB RAM, Bluetooth, WiFi, GSM/GPRS, miniSD, 240x320 pixel with 18-bit Color, 5.52" x 2.01" x 0.95", 2 Mega Pixel Camera, and Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition for Phone Edition.
    Although the Samsung prototype has a superior form factor, my HP iPAQ h6315 has many of the same features--minus 64M ROM, a 2-megapixel camera, and some other cool stuff. Although I'm happy with what I have, sluggishness is a real issue with my iPAQ: and I could certainly use the extra CPU power.

    I wonder if the CPU is an XScale? ... hmmm ...

    The camera--for me--is a gimmicky thing, I hardly *ever* use it.

    I've got a bad case of mobile technolust... someone please help :)
    --
    Sigs cause cancer.
    1. Re:Mobile envy by CMiYC · · Score: 2, Informative

      The camera--for me--is a gimmicky thing, I hardly *ever* use it.

      For me, cameras on the phone are a PITA. I can't carry it into most customer sites since cameras are prohibited. On top of that, I agree with you on it being a gimmick. The phone I have does have a camera and other than to geek-play with it, I've never used it. I've never even thought, "Hey I have a camera right here!"

      Granted, maybe that's because I end up leaving it in the car most of the time.

    2. Re:Mobile envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The camera--for me--is a gimmicky thing, I hardly *ever* use it.

      The camera literally costs the manufacturer a $1.50 dollar to throw in. (CMOS is $1 cents, lens is 25 cents .. another 25 cents for software dev and HW interface).

      So there's basically no cost to you to have the camera, and it's useful in an emergency (roadside etc. .. and sometimes when shopping for stuff u can use it to show the other person what you are about to purchase).

    3. Re:Mobile envy by vluther · · Score: 1

      you do realize, most people in the US are envious of you ?

      Specially those who've never used the iPAQ 6315. Tmobile sent me the unit the day they did the pre-sale (late august).. I returned it promptly after using it for a week and having to do hard resets 5 times.

      I now have an M1000 from Orange (unlocked) and am using it with Tmobile, it's great You lose the built in Wifi, but GPRS is fine for me, specially on my plan, plus you get +64MB ram and a faster processor. The M1000 costs less, and is should have been the iPAQ, but oh well.

      Try to sell it on Ebay, and buy the m1000 from someone else on ebay :/

      Aside from that, the Samsung 3GB player I think is rumored to use Stereo BT, so you will get wireless stereo music.. that in itself will be awesome.. something Apple may want to get into as well, specially since their laptops all have BT, next logical step for the PAN, small bt headsets..

    4. Re:Mobile envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


      I've got a bad case of mobile technolust... someone please help :)


      Maybe it'll help if you realize that eventually the succesor to the B-Bop will be the MBop. And all the ringtones will be other Hanson songs.

    5. Re:Mobile envy by Steve+Embalmer · · Score: 0

      The camera literally costs the manufacturer a $1.50 dollar to throw in

      Care to site a reference for that? I suspect what you may be referring to a low cost of materials (even that seems low to me--CCDs are not that cheap), but the sales and manufacturing costs can be quite high on such items.

    6. Re:Mobile envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and sometimes when shopping for stuff u can use it to show the other person what you are about to purchase

      "A pile of blurry dots?"

    7. Re:Mobile envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is English, but you seem to like it.

    8. Re:Mobile envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you talking about. I don't see PHP mentioned ANYWHERE in his post.

    9. Re:Mobile envy by gubbas · · Score: 1

      All this and more than likly a $800+ price tag.

      --
      "What I need is an exact list of specific unknown problems we might encounter."
    10. Re:Mobile envy by Serious+Simon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wonder if the CPU is an XScale? ... hmmm ...

      I doubt it because Samsung make their own ARM processors (XScale are Intel's ARM CPU's)

    11. Re:Mobile envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its in the guys url

    12. Re:Mobile envy by therblig · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'd pay the $1.50 just to have them leave it off. My phone would not be useful to me if I had to leave it at the security desk when I visit customers who ban the phones because they have that lousy camera on them. (I think all our major customers ban them.) Unfortunately, it is getting harder to get phones without the cameras.

      I don't have a camera phone, but the one I have looks peculiar enough that at one customer's site, I had to wait while security inspected my phone for a few minutes to make sure no camera was hidden there.

      --

      I struggled for days and days and all I got was this lousy sig.

    13. Re:Mobile envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll attempt!

    14. Re:Mobile envy by James.Stanton · · Score: 1

      Never mind the topless bars also now make you leave your camera phone in your car.

    15. Re:Mobile envy by dewke · · Score: 1

      For me, cameras on the phone are a PITA. I can't carry it into most customer sites since cameras are prohibited

      I had the same problem. I never even thought about it until I went to a government facility and they said "No cameras". I left my phone in the car the rest of the week.

      I could care less about having a camera, but I do want bluetooth.

      --
      Oderint dum metuant
    16. Re:Mobile envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least its not perl.

    17. Re:Mobile envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Care to site a reference

      "cite"

    18. Re:Mobile envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you would know this how?

  2. It was only a matter of time by dnixon112 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Until phones and ipod style mp3 players converged. I'm still waiting for the model that includes the kitchen sink.

    1. Re:It was only a matter of time by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was only a matter of time until phones and ipod style mp3 players converged.

      Ah, but this isn't the case - the 3gb hard drive is just there to hold even longer, more annoying ring tones. The factory default will use bluetooth to sense when the owner is nowhere near the phone and then launch into a 4-hour midi retrospective of Nelly: the early years.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    2. Re:It was only a matter of time by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      Ah, but this isn't the case - the 3gb hard drive is just there to hold even longer, more annoying ring tones. The factory default will use bluetooth to sense when the owner is nowhere near the phone and then launch into a 4-hour midi retrospective of Nelly: the early years.

      I think a more likely scenario is that with more storage the ringtones will play at CD-quality sample rates. Imagine hearing the first 40 seconds of Die Meistersinger as some woman fumbles frantically through her handbag the next time you're at the movies. A dark future, indeed.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  3. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I managed to get a mirror if needed.
    --
    Over 200 Gmail accounts!

    1. Re:Mirror by mpr · · Score: 1

      No need for a mirror...

      The owner of that site didn't actually remove the pics! They were just cunningly renamed with a '1' at the end of the filename:

      http://www.davespda.com/special/samsung_sp_proto1. jpg
      http://www.davespda.com/special/samsung_pe_proto1. jpg
      http://www.davespda.com/special/samsung_mag_proto1 .jpg

      Ooops... Should I have kept quiet about that?

    2. Re:Mirror by nanodude · · Score: 1

      yeah ... i just saw that too! :)

      was gonna post it.

  4. Intentional?? by spac3manspiff · · Score: 1

    Could this be a stunt informing consumers to hold off on buying a treo 650 before the holidays?

    Oh wait the holidays are over... who knows

    1. Re:Intentional?? by JaxWeb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Whether it is a stunt or not, I'm never going to buy a Samsung again.

      After owning first a Nokia, and then a Sony Erikson, I now own a Samsung phone, and although the phone looks nice, it is horrible to use compared to my old phone. The care wasn't taken to make it useable.

      Things like text messages being start in Upper Case (without settings to change it) and if you were to press the Big-Red-Button by accident whilst typing a text message, the message will be lost without any confirmation, nor does it save it to "Drafts", for example. The better hardware was made less useful due to bad userinterface. The Sony, on the other hand, was made far more useable and a better phone, even lacking the extra features of the Samsung Hardware (big colour screen, video recording, lots of memory, etc).

      Although the phones this article is about are very different to the phone I have, I still don't think I could trust buying another Samsung phone, after getting this one and being constantly irritated by it.

      Saying that, how deep does Windows Mobile go? As much as people reading this message will hate Microsoft, they'll probably admit they constantly do a good job of user interfaces, so maybe these ones won't be too bad? Although a phone which can play music... Hmm. Not sure I want one of those.

      --
      - Jax
    2. Re:Intentional?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's very true with some manufacturers. One of the earliest cellphones I have used was a Siemens phone that was thin but almost as wide as a CD-jewelbox. User interface and menu system were both really shitty.

      Back in 2003 I bought an inexpensive Siemens mobile phone that was marketed heavily around here in Finland. And what did I see: the same horrifying mess once again, this time packed in a slick case. Gave that one to a friend and told him I never want to see it again. Hope he still is a friend...

    3. Re:Intentional?? by the31337z3r0 · · Score: 0

      Cell phones are made great in my book by durability. I've had 2 Samsung phones, and I wouldn't have traded them for the world. They're damn tanks, and I've seen Nokias, Motorolas, and Sonys go to shit real quick. It's all relative, though. I really don't see myself buying one of these, and I will admit that they've started throwing in extra crap that no one really needs in a cell phone. Can't blame ya for not wanting to buy another, though. I wouldn't buy them if it weren't for their durability.

    4. Re:Intentional?? by Rastan_B2 · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree on the gripes about Samsung hardware. I too had a nokia and sony-ericson before my Samsung G700, and they both (nokia especially) left the Samsung software for dead.
      The most annoying feature for me was not being able to go back and 'reselect' the word in the text message I am typing. For instance if you are typing quite quickly and forgot to change a word and have typed another word after it, you have to go back and delete the word you can re-choose.
      As for music... bring it on, I currently use a 256 MB player for jogging, a 20GB iRiver for longer distances (riding, busing etc) and of course a mobile. In fact my mp3 player and phone are the 2 most commonly carried pieces of my arsonal, if they could be combined I would be stoked.

    5. Re:Intentional?? by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      Saying that, how deep does Windows Mobile go?

      From what I've seen and heard, the T-Mobile ones need to be rebooted (hard reset) once a week or more. Compared to my T610 or old-school Nokia, which *never* crashed.

      Now, that's not to say Windows Mobile is bad, it may be "improper" use or some other hand-wavable user offense, but everyone at my previous employer had the problem... I was the only one who opted for a Nokia.

      But it sync'd with Outlook and had all these other features that they supposedly needed (but rarely used)... I think the biggest plus was that they could use terminal services from it. The phone was huge though and looked rediculous when you held it to your head.

  5. Token_M$_Bashing_Post_01 by Brandon+One · · Score: 0, Troll

    *rabble rabble*
    How dare Samsung use Microsoft!?
    *rabble rabble*

    1. Re:Token_M$_Bashing_Post_01 by csplinter · · Score: 0

      *roaring crowd* Mayor: People, People, standing around saying "rabble" over and over isn't going to help anything. Stan's dad: But mayor we don't now what else to do Man in crowd: rabble... rabble rabble Crowd: rab-rable-le ra-rabl-ble-e rab-rable-le (south park) ;) classic

    2. Re:Token_M$_Bashing_Post_01 by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      mmm, McDonalds hamburgers.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  6. In other news... by Ironsides · · Score: 4, Funny

    One phone uses a 500Mhz processor and other had a 3Gbyte Hard Drive for music."

    In other news, the RIAA has filed a lawsuit against Samsung for encouraging pirating of music on mobile phones. Details to follow...

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    1. Re:In other news... by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > > One phone uses a 500Mhz processor and other had a 3Gbyte Hard Drive for music."
      >
      > In other news, the RIAA has filed a lawsuit against Samsung for encouraging pirating of music on mobile phones. Details to follow...

      "Can you hear me now?"
      "Yes."
      "Good. Now my record label can sue you!"

    2. Re:In other news... by mopslik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Details to follow...

      In a press conference, RIAA CEO Mitch Bainwol identified Samsung's new 500Mhz phone as "equivalent to 10 50MHz phones".

      "Clearly, Samsung is aiding pirates by providing them with the tools necessary to violate our copyrights. You might not think that a slow and dodgy cellphone can be used for piracy, but with today's technologies ... hey, all it takes is a couple of dedicated hackers to pull this off. And with a 500Mhz processor, well, it's pretty clear that this is an act of war against IP holders everywhere."

    3. Re:In other news... by penthouseplayah · · Score: 1

      On the contrary. They put DRM on anything downloded from the web via wap on my X100

      I own a Samsung X100 and have I ever regreted buying that piece of sh*t.

      1) DRM: Samsung has decided that anything that is downloaded from the net is DRM. Even MY pictures of MY girlfrind that I too and put on MY webserver. Yep those I cannot send as a mms. " Can't send. DRM picture" (yup that's a jpeg)

      2) As said before no capital after a period. My ancient Nokia 3210 had that.

      3) Loosing messages buy hitting a wrong button. If you've gotten to pick the phone number to sned an sms to, theres only sending or killing the message.

      4) Can't change the quick buttons (the arrows), even though that feature exist on the older Samsung C100.

      5) Ringtone volume. Why the f*ck does the ringtone volume follow the speaker volume. When my mom calls she's yelling like a maniac and I always tuns down the volume. Then later my girlfriend calls but I won't hear it because the ringtone is ridicously low (even on the high setting)

      The only thing you'll be sure to hear is the games melody, that funny enough doesn't follow the volume level, its always louder that you'll ever want even your ringtone to be.

      6) Calendar. No option to purge old appointments

      It looks like they didn't even test it out for 10 minutes.

      I'll never buy a Samsung phone again, NEVER.

      Pretty happy with my Samsung 710t though.

  7. Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Khomar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I long for the days when I used to be able to get a simple cell phone with a simple interface, contact phone book, and good reception -- for less than $25 dollars a month! Cell phones are getting so ridiculous that I finally gave up on them. You have to pay at least $45 a month (after taxes...), and for what? Internet access that I don't use. Games that I don't play. Instant text that costs me even more.

    I wonder if a bare-bones plan with simple, easy to use phones (not glorified PDA's/cameras/gaming consoles) would actually do quite well in today's market for people like me that don't need all of the frills. I know people have talked about this before, but why aren't the cell phone companies listening?

    --

    I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    1. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Knobby · · Score: 1

      My parents were complaining about this last week. For the last few years they've had a no frills 50 minute plan that cost them ~$10/month. Last month, they were informed that their plan is no longer being offered and when their contract ends at the end of the year, they would have to select a new plan. The lowest cost plan offered has now increased to ~$20/month.

    2. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I'd buy one.

    3. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by natron+2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just buy a prepaid one... most of those phones are barebones with no extras...

    4. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. I don't want color - you can't see it outside in the sun because of the glare. I don't want a camera, I already have a good digital camera. I don't care about games. Pr0n looks crappy on the tiny screen, so internet access is unnecessary. Ditto for email. I rarely use text messaging. Just give me a small, cheap, and reliable phone that makes calls and has a good phone book (Nokia's is my favorite). Is that really too much to ask? I don't want a do-it-all phone, I just want a phone!

    5. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by ad0gg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tell them to buy prepaid service. Cell companies listen to their valuable customers, someone shelling out $10 a month isn't a valuable customer. People like my sister, and her friends who shell out $50 to $100 a month because they talk on their phones all time are the ones they listen too. They are also the people who send picture messages at 0.25 cents a pop and text messages at 0.10 cents a pop. Can't send picture messages without a camera. Can't sell my sister $2 ring tones unless the phone supports them. Ring tones is a billion dollar industry.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    6. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by kamasutra · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know people have talked about this before, but why aren't the cell phone companies listening?

      Because as you say it yourself, you want to pay them LESS. It might still be good idea to follow your market if it's large enough, but obviuosly they don't think it is.

    7. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by dema · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if a bare-bones plan with simple, easy to use phones (not glorified PDA's/cameras/gaming consoles) would actually do quite well in today's market for people like me that don't need all of the frills.

      Amen to that. I would kill for simple plan, with a couple hundred minutes per month and basic cell phone with contact list and call log.

      After losing a cell phone I had for ages I avoided getting a new one for a few years until I moved to take a job and got the cheapest plan I could find from AT&T. I was forced to get a tiny little flip phone with full color and a million features (at least it was free) which I absolutely hate. Once I finally started using it regularly (after a few months or so) I realized the freaking voicemail service doesn't even tell me the time and date of a message. This was a feature I had in my old ass nokia 5 frekain years go! At that point I could not cancel without paying some outrageous fee and basically got the run around for AT&T as to why they couldn't provide such a simple service.

      Anyway, enough ranting. I would kill for a damn simple plan.

    8. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Dragoon412 · · Score: 1

      You may want to look into the Motorla V60 line. They're still being manufactured, they're tough as nails, and no-frills at all. Pretty cheap, too.

      But I agree, I think newer phones designed for basic functionality would do well. As it is, the last few phones I've owned have been too big, bloated, and blumsy to match the V60 in ease of use, but nowhere near functional and practical enough to replace a PDA. I'm tired of these half-functional phones, and would gladly jump at the opportunity for a simple phone that's small, tough, easy to use, and looks good.

    9. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by gunnk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The cell phone companies may be listening, but they don't care. Customers like you aren't worth anything to them. Competition between providers continues to force them to provide more and more airtime for less and less money. If all you want to do is talk on your phone they aren't going to make much profit off of you.

      The folks that use data services, SMS, buy games and custom ringtones, and send pics (or even better: video clips!) are where the money is.

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
    10. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by thelenm · · Score: 1

      ...why aren't the cell phone companies listening?

      They're too busy playing exciting racing games and listening to their MP3 collection. They can't hear the phone ringing.

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
    11. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      except prepaid minutes expire.

      So yeah, you could shell out 120$ to get a "years worth" [going by the OP] of service but the time expires often in under three months.

      Cell phones are largely just a huge scam. Rogers [in ontario they're a big comms provider] reported around 700 million dollars in PROFIT linky linky.

      That's because they rip you off seven ways from sunday.

      You have the

      - service plan
      - service fee
      - license fee
      - 911 access fee
      - roaming fee
      - text msg roaming fee
      - long distance call fee [isn't that roaming?]
      - data rate fee [of 0.15$ per KB...]
      - ...

      And they invent charges too. My replacement phone was file as a "technology upgrade" and they charged me 35$ for "activation" even though I already had an account with them.

      The problem is like all other businesses they assume they should keep making profits even if they don't give the customer what they actually want [a simple phone service without frills].

      I ranted about this before. Like the scam on quadband phones. The only quadband GSM my provider offers comes crammed with useless crap like java, cameras, mp3 playback, etc... So they get away with charging an arm and leg for it [though I'm sure motorola had a hand in limiting the selection].

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    12. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Bertie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seems like mobile phones are about the only example of a market where Americans get a far worse deal than everybody else in the world. Here in the UK you can currently get a very good UMTS phone which does video calling and the lot for free, on a contract which gives you 500 minutes of calls to any network at any time of day, 20 minutes of video calls, 100 SMS messages, 20 MMS messages, and who knows what else, for FIVE POUNDS A MONTH. When it's that cheap, why wouldn't you want all the bells and whistles?

    13. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by KyleJacobson · · Score: 0

      Why aren't the cell phone companies listening?

      They tell us what we want, not the other way around. Thats all companies do now, we can tell them what we want, but they will never listen to us. They will always give us what they think we want (need), or what they think is "best" for us.

      All I know is, new phone = new shit that I dont need.

      --
      I have worse karma than M$.
    14. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The reason why 3 do deals that cheap is they're having a *really* hard time convincing anyone that video is worth the extra cost.

      They're hoping that getting everyone in for the first 3-6 months at a loss will get them used to the technology so they can pay later... not sure it's going to work, myself.

      Normal contracts start at around £15 a month for most providers... Prepay is much cheaper (unlike the US, prepay doesn't expire in this country, so if you only make £10 of calls in a year that's all it costs).

    15. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they expire, but if you don't use it a lot you're only buying a $20-40 card every two or three months, which isn't nearly as much of a rip off as the regular monthly plans (which I agree are a scam most of the time). And from what I've seen the $100+, "year-long" cards are good for a year, not three months.

    16. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I am confused as to who you are referring to. There are cell phone makers and there are cellular sevice providers. The service providers lose money whenever anyone signs up because they pay the phone maker far more than they charge the consumer (who usually has to pay nothing at all). As far as the cell phone maker is concerned, it doesn't matter how much what they're selling costs as long as they make money.

      So, if a very cheap phone is released, the cell phone maker could charge 150% of the price, which would be less than the cellular service providers are paying now. It's an improvement for both because the cell phone makers are making more money, and the service providers are losing less money.

      Now in theory, 0% of your monthly cost is directly tied to the amount your phone is actually worth. However if people buy the cheaper phones which costs the provider less for the cell phones, their profitability increases and the monthly fees can go down, still increasing their profit.

      Basically this is a good guy vs bad guy situation, and we're in the bad guy neighborhood.

    17. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think if you took out the camera, extra memory, extra processor power and bulk, and the other "frills," you'd be left with a derek zoolander phone :)

    18. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by fani · · Score: 0

      ..... One phone uses a 500Mhz processor and other had a 3Gbyte Hard Drive for music.....

      Yes, but can it wipe my ass ?

    19. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by kamasutra · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not that simple. Phone makers and cellular service providers are much more dependant on each other. You provided one example yourself: most people buy phone attached to some plan from service provider.

      This means that service providers are major sales channel for phone makers and therefore have a lot to say about what kind of phones will be sold (hence produced). E.g. SonyEricsson created a special phone just for Vodafone (V800).

      The cost of producing simple phone is not that much different from the cost of producing a more feature-laden one. However, the difference in perceived value, which is the basis for determining the price people are willing to pay, is quite large. This means that fancy phones have a higher profit margin (which is not all that big anyway).

      Hence, you don't get cheap simple phones, because not enough people would be willing to pay more or less the same price for a lot less features.

      I'm not saying this is true, but I think that they (phone makers and service providers) believe so.

    20. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1
      You may want to look into the Motorla V60 line.

      Ugh, no you don't. Until recently I had a Motorola V60 (TDMA) through Cingular, and it was the crappiest, call-droppingliest phone I've ever used. Half the time it couldn't recieve incoming calls, usually the urgent ones, and the resulting voice mail would sometimes take *hours* before showing up. When you do manage to receive or make a call, the other end can't hear you because your voice breaks up too badly. Also, the V60 is somewhat small, but rather fat at the same time, so it doesn't go well in either a pocket nor a belt clip. Gawd, I only suffered with the thing because it was on my brother's family plan and I didn't have to pay anything for it. Stay away.

      Since then I've happily replaced it with a simple Nokia 1100 from TracFone. Its an easy pre-paid service, with 1-year cards available (other plans only have 60-day cards). And the Nokia 1100 is a thin, lightweight, no-nonsense black & white phone than runs for a week on a charge. Lovin' it!

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    21. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 pounds per month? Does it come with free international long distance?

    22. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      Insightful post, my good man.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    23. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Julian352 · · Score: 1

      You are confusing the features of the provider with the features of the phone. Voicemail is something done by the provider and has NOTHING to do with the type of the phone. And if you don't like flip-phones, a 30 second trip to ATT could show you that there is Sony-Ericson T637. Other providers offer similar and more "brick-like" phones. (ie. TMobile with Nokia 6010, Samsung R225m, etc.)

      Don't confuse your lack of research with lack of offerings.

    24. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Datafage · · Score: 1

      Um, your phone has nothing to do with whether you get the time and date of a voicemail. That is entirely dependent on your service provider, in your case AT&T.

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    25. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Julian352 · · Score: 1

      One of my professors who is in the embedded devices business has said that the cost of putting a camera on a phone is about $8. That is about the maximum cost that the manufacturer is willing to spend on a new feature to make sure to recoup their investment. (That's $8 in manufacturing cost, not including development I think)

    26. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by dema · · Score: 1

      I apoligize if you were confused. The sentence is misleading, although I imagine most people (on slash at least) understand that voicemail has nothing to do with the phone.

      At the time, all of those other phones would've cost me more than $0.00, so none of them were worth consideration. Believe me, I did my research, found the cheapest possible plan/phone combination, and it still has more ussless shit than i'll ever need.

      Don't confuse your assumptions with fact.

    27. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, I butchered that sentence in my ranting (:

    28. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by TSage · · Score: 1

      What about the pre-paid plans? While they aren't the best deal if you talk a lot, it seems easier and cheaper if you just want to talk every now and then. Also, the few I have looked at seem to do nothing but phone calls and maybe voice-mail. Straightforward as can be, it seems.

      TSage

    29. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by k.ellsworth · · Score: 1

      i live in Chile, and the customer protection law, prevents the phonr operators from switching you from plans.

      i have a 3 year old plan with 1000 minutes to non-mobile phones country wide, and same operator mobile phones, just for 26 USD$ month.
      but they almost cut you an arm off for calling other operators phones (0.24 USD$/min).

      the activation fee is the same shit here. In Chile there are 2 ways of getting a phone, buying it from the OPERATOR or leasing it from the operator for 24 months, then they change their (remember the phone is never yours and if you brake it, you have to pay it) phone for a new phone( +activation fee) for 24 months more and so on.

      --
      Putting a windows cd backwards, plays evil messages, but it gets worse, putting it right, installs windows.
    30. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Julian352 · · Score: 1

      All of the phones I've listed are currently offered for $0.00 from their respective providers. The phones without extra features are usually free with new activation.

    31. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      currently

    32. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      I know people have talked about this before, but why aren't the cell phone companies listening?

      I'd guess it's because you're talking to the wrong people, or there aren't enough people who share your point of view.

      Gee, that wasn't so hard.

    33. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "FIVE POUNDS A MONTH"

      I don't buy it. T-Mobile and Vodafone don't offer anything anywhere near that price. Show me the provider.

    34. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1
      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    35. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      They don't listen because they don't compete on the benefits of their network. They don't want to sell you a cheap plan. They want to sell you a cute phone with lock in to a high revenue plan.

      You need to regulation to prevent government granted limited monopolies (i.e. cellular providers) from locking in handsets to contracts, and distorting the market for their benefit.

      This would force them to compete on cost and quality of their network service. The phone manufacturers would have to compete on the cost and usefulness of their phones, not how desirable it is for the cellular provider to provide as a subsidised handset.

    36. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When will you people stop complaining about all the extra features? If you dont want to use them, dont. I bought a camera phone for communication only but I've used every single feature on the phone during its life time. Sure, I didnt buy it for the calculator, calendar, games, txt msgs, or internet acess but they were all definately used more than once. I consider it a good purchase. As for the color screen, it looks quite nice and the battery life is acceptable even when the screen is at full brightness. Just put up with it. No one is going to release an early 90s phone to please you. Now im just waiting for my 500 mhz cpu so I can write a java graphing calculator.

    37. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I could get a "year-long" card for my phone I would be all over it. Sadly I can't.

    38. Re:Missing Old Cell Phones/Plans by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      Can't send picture messages without a camera. Can't sell my sister $2 ring tones unless the phone supports them. Ring tones is a billion dollar industry.

      If you get a phone with Bluetooth, and your PC has it as well, you can use Bluetooth to transfer ringtones (MIDIs), pictures, themes, games, etc. Surprisingly, Gnome's Bluetooth subsystem works great, better, in fact, than Windows XP SP2.

  8. Reply_Supporting_Parent_01 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *rabble rabble* M$ iz cr4p !!11!!1one th1s w1ll cr4sh and suxx0rz *rabble rabble*

  9. Nice by Aleman · · Score: 1

    Mobile Tetris never ran better!

    1. Re:Nice by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      Tetris, for me, is an absolute must in any phone. In fact, I've only really two other needs

      1. Easy to search contacts

      2. Easy to edit contacts

      And as long as it is also phone, I'm pretty much happy.

      Though if it can run Super Puzzle Fighter 2, via infrared/bluetooth against others, I would be ecstactic.

  10. No Surprise, really by hey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is exactly where everyone knows phones are going. Too bad they don't have what I want: seamless connection to WiFi and VoIP, seamless connection landline Wireless base.

  11. oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yet another set of phones that amalgamates more crappy functionality and drives the cost up for the user who simply wants a phone...

    3GB disk? Too small for most music collections.
    Let's not forget the crappy DSP most phones have anyways and 22Khz DAC ...

    Oh and yet another camera with mildly low resolution...

    [blah blah blah]

    Why doesn't samsung introduce a cell phone that lasts for 6 months on a charge [standby not talk] or that can take a 5 story fall off a balcony or something. Or at least a fall from 6 ft without splitting in half... of the three cell phones I've had the cheapest POS motorola v120c was the toughest. My 300$ flip phone and my current c256 phone both will split open upon the slighest drop...

    Those are features people can actually use. Not flimsy cell phones with short battery lives [well that's not entirely the case] and a whole slew of semi-functional additions that are otherwise totally fucking useless.

    If I want to carry tunes with me I'll bring my mp3cd player. It's easier to deal with, was a hell of a lot cheaper and has excellent sound quality. If I want to snap pictures I'll bring my PowerShot. It has a much higher [5MP] resolution and is more configurable for actually taking pictures [the average camera phone can't adjust things like exposure, white balance, etc...]

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I find your ideas intriguing, and wish to subscribe to your
      newsletter.

    2. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Send 1$ to "Happy Homer" 123 Evergreen terrace...

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by limbostar · · Score: 1
      Why doesn't samsung introduce a cell phone that lasts for 6 months on a charge [standby not talk] or that can take a 5 story fall off a balcony or something. Or at least a fall from 6 ft without splitting in half... of the three cell phones I've had the cheapest POS motorola v120c was the toughest. My 300$ flip phone and my current c256 phone both will split open upon the slighest drop...
      If they did this, you would buy one, and then never buy another cell phone ever again. They have a vested interest in ensuring that you will eventually need to replace your cell phone. Compare to Microsoft Office, Gillette, and toilet paper.
      --
      this is a sig.
    4. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 3GB disk? Too small for most music collections.

      Bull. With 3Gb and suitable encoding you could store up to 50 albums.

    5. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Stop whining and spring for the $15 leather case Thomas. I've dropped both of my phones multiple times without any damage besides the obvious paint damage. One is an Audiovox and the other happens to be Samsung. As far as the features - these are exactly what the market is looking for. Maybe not the camera part but an integrated mp3 player, pda and phone is exactly what i'm in the market for.

    6. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by savagedome · · Score: 2, Interesting

      3GB disk? Too small for most music collections

      Remember iPod mini? 4GB is too small for most music collections.

    7. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by garcia · · Score: 1

      If I want to snap pictures I'll bring my PowerShot. It has a much higher [5MP] resolution and is more configurable for actually taking pictures [the average camera phone can't adjust things like exposure, white balance, etc...]

      You know, I do both. I can't exactly pull out my 5MP digital camera in the middle of a store and take a photo of a random item and upload it to my gallery immediately. I can with my mobile camera though.

      I use my 5MP camera for stuff when I'm geocaching or out with the finace touring the countryside. I use the mobile camera for little things where quality doesn't matter much.

      Most people don't use their cell phone camera in that manner but they could. Most people don't need 5MP (hell, I don't need really need it as I resize 99.9% of my photos to 1024x768 for my gallery anyway).

    8. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Bertie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's like those old Vidal Sassoon adverts. "Take two bottles into the shower? Not me. Now I have a crappy shampoo and a crappy conditioner in one! Just watch me flick my shiny hair from side to side, and imagine I haven't spent the last two hours in a stylist's chair!"

      If you really want to cart around a phone, an MP3 player and a camera at all times, go ahead. Right now your phone might not be able to do a job as good as all three, but it's good enough for some, and by the looks of what Samsung are up to, it won't be long before they're good enough for a lot of people. I mean, Casio have a phone out in Japan with autofocus.

      It wasn't so long ago that you'd have needed a room full of all sorts of equipment to play music, watch videos, play games, etc. Now all you need is a decent PC. That's progress.

    9. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Brandon+One · · Score: 1

      If they did this, you would buy one, and then never buy another cell phone ever again. They have a vested interest in ensuring that you will eventually need to replace your cell phone. Compare to Microsoft Office, Gillette, and toilet paper. It is called planned obsolescence. And has been an accept bussiness practice since WWII. Plus it is morally justified by the Bible. Think about it. God created us with planned obslescence. Get used to it because it will out live you. Pun intended.

    10. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Why should I buy a case? The phone comes in a case already!!! It should take a 6ft fall [well more like 5ft...] just fine. I mean they're meant to be carried around.

      I can see a laptop needing a case as they're not meant to be used while walking around and standing up on the bus. But a cell phone is.

      Would it be really hard to use small screws in the case instead of using pressure cases? If the customer can't figure out a phillips screw driver they deserve to pay the clerk at the store to install their battery ;-) [though the last cell I bought they had put the battery+sim in for me]

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    11. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > that can take a 5 story fall off a balcony or something. Or at least a fall from 6 ft without splitting in half...

      I picked up a Motorola i305 when I signed up with Nextel. (Got it via Amazon - after $150 rebate, I ended up making some good money on the deal!) Rubberized exterior, MilSpec for resistance to rain, salt fog, humidity, shock and dust. Decent battery life even without the optional higher-cap battery. I doubt it would be bothered much by dropping 6 feet, though a 5-story fall might do it in. Certainly more robust than any other phone I've had. Since Nextel focuses on the construction/public safety/industrial market, they tend to offer at least a few more rugged models.

      Even with the Sprint/Nextel merger, iden should be supported for a couple of more years. Hopefully they will have a robust line of phones for their new network.

    12. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by man_ls · · Score: 1

      This is why I purchased the leather case for my phone. It slips over it and provides what looks like an insignificant amount of padding, but in informal "drop tests" my friend's similar phone with no padding bounces, rattles, and spins on contact with the ground. Mine will sort of thud, rock up a bit, and drop.

      The tiny extra bit of padding is all it needs to sustain 0 damage on falls from normal heights, it my experience.

    13. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by hey · · Score: 1

      You have a good point. A hard drive (of any size) is the last thing I want in a cell phone.

    14. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      The problem is the lack of choice.

      You think Samsung wants to continue selling basic cheapy phones where they make slim profits? Why should I pay for their R&D when the "new bonus value added gourmet quality" additions are things I really don't want?

      If I go to pick up a cell phone I should be able to pick up a "featureless" phone. I [the customer] should have a choice in the matter.

      Sadly the choice now is "cell phone, no cell phone"

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    15. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like hitting the return key every few
      words.

    16. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Bertie · · Score: 1

      I take your point, but I'm a bit surprised that there's nothing available wherever you are that fits the bill for you. I'm pretty sure dead basic Nokias and what-have-you are still on sale here in the UK, with just annual cosmetic tweaks to keep them looking fresh. I'm not sure how many contracts offer them, though, because I suppose the market's pretty small - everybody seems to want to be able to show off the latest gadget-laden phones, not just teenagers and geeks.

      As fot toughened phones, maybe there just isn't much of a market for them? Nokia definitely had one out a couple of years ago - it had a moulded-rubber case which could resist falling down the toilet or whatever - but I'm not sure what happened to it.

    17. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that can take a 5 story fall off a balcony or something

      Hello? Yeah I've fallen out of my 5th floor apartment .. can someone send an ambulance? ..
      Thank goodness my phone works. Let me play some mp3's to pass the time. ..
      Wait someone's coming to rob my phone .. ..
      *scuffle*

    18. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      it had a moulded-rubber case which could resist falling down the toilet or whatever - but I'm not sure what happened to it.

      Somebody flushed.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    19. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by erlenic · · Score: 0

      Who has a music collection that small? The only people I know of who do wouldn't get this cell phone, they don't want one at all.

    20. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha! Kids say the darndest things! "50 albums" is nowhere near a "music collection". I have about 1,000 albums that I have collected over the past 47 years and I've not been working at it like some people I know.

    21. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Yet another set of phones that amalgamates more crappy functionality and drives the cost up for the user who simply wants a phone...

      I can go get a phone for free, and get unlimited evenings and weekends plus hundreds of daytime minutes from nearly any cell carrier I can think of for under 20 bucks. Is this still not cheap enough for you? Get a pay-as-you-go phone.

      3GB disk? Too small for most music collections.

      You know, not everyone wants to carry around their whole music collection. For some people being able to listen to 16+ hours of music non-stop is enough. WTF is your commute anyway?

      Even aside from that your complaints make no sense. My music collection is over 90 GB. You going to put that on a portable player? So much for your iPod - way too small. I guess the iPod sucks too since it can't "fit my whole music collection".

      Oh and yet another camera with mildly low resolution...

      It's not for taking professional photos. It's for taking that snapshot of the funny sign to email to your buddy. Not everyone wants to carry around a 4 lb camera bag for their 8MP SLR everywhere.

      The point of convergence is not to have a best-of-breed anything. There will always be standalone digital cameras, standalone MP3 players. Just like you can still go out and buy standalone home theater components. But just because the radio in my alarm clock doesn't bring in the stations as well as my JVC receiver, doesn't mean my alarm clock "sucks" or "has no purpose".

    22. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by deft · · Score: 1

      "It wasn't so long ago that you'd have needed a room full of all sorts of equipment to play music, watch videos, play games, etc. Now all you need is a decent PC. That's progress."

      I dont think you understand. That guy has a band in the living room, a projector in his basement, and an arcade in the kitchen. You know, because it's more convenient.

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    23. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Is consumer culture planned obsolescense or is it the result of our wish to do less work, have more leisure time, and "make life easier?" Every purchase is the result of a more or less deliberate decision-making process, and in most product categories, the passage of time does bring "better" things, and by better I mean more features, miniturization, etc. In this system, durability naturally suffers, but since most consumers tend to buy replacements before the original actually breaks, it is a sensible descision on the part of the manufacturer to make items this way. Anyway, check this link. The book is most relevant to this discussion. No time to elaborate further, cheers.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    24. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words... "Goober Grape"

    25. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I've had nothing but Samsung phones and all of them seem to be the toughest phones. My sister dropped her samsung phone into a river, it still worked. I dropped my S105 quite a number of times from much more than 6'. The one time it broke was because two people were fighting over the phone and one crushed the screen on the other persons hand. The phone was replaced free (didn't even have to pay S&H.)

      My current phone from samsung (forgot the model number) lets me adjust the white balance, exposure, and some other things. It's not better than my Canon EOS Digital Rebel but there have been a lot of times where I could really use a camera but didn't have time to setup my SLR. Plus the phone has a built in light for the camera, so if it's too dark I can turn the light on. There are so many features in a phone that people say are quite useless, and they usually are useless for that person, but just because it's useless to you, doesn't mean it's useless to everyone.

    26. Re:oh great [redundant post.... redundant comment] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why doesn't samsung introduce a cell phone that lasts for 6 months on a charge [standby not talk] or that can take a 5 story fall off a balcony or something."

      That's great for you, but some of us actually take pretty good care of our phones. Meanwhile, people spend $200 on a phone, they want value. You'd be surprised how few people who own cell phones also load up their pockets with MP3 players, digital cameras, and Game Boys every moment they are carrying their phones. I know I don't lug all that junk around. In the mean time, I've captured quite a few unexpected photos of my nephew being silly. I've even got an amusing video of my dog teasing my cat. (That moment would have been lost forever if I unpacked my video camera etc...)

      Frankly, a 6 month battery life or an incredible survival rate wouldn't have been much value to me, at least in comparison to the pictures I've captured. My phone does for me what a PDA is supposed to do.

      My point? Well it's simple. Companies are making these phones because people are buying and enjoying them. Supply and demand.

  12. ++Token_M$_Bashing_Post_01 by spac3manspiff · · Score: 1

    just when i thought they were going to use linux.

    1. Re:++Token_M$_Bashing_Post_01 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try again, New Guy. You are not funny, neither are any of your previous posts.

    2. Re:++Token_M$_Bashing_Post_01 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neither are any of your previous posts

      I agree. spac3manspiff is typical of a new /. breed of one-liner "wit" that is basically a futile attempt at karmawhoring.

      N00bsflash boys and girls...

      NO KARMA FOR YOU!

    3. Re:++Token_M$_Bashing_Post_01 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah if you wanna see posting done right, check out this guy, he's amazing.

  13. Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will they run Linux?? XD

    1. Re:Yes, but... by Squatchman · · Score: 3, Funny

      A member of the OSS community has hacked them to run linux.

      However, due to difficulties in porting the kernel over some features are a bit lackluster. So the camera no longer functions, the mp3 player performance is somewhat slow, no contact information can be saved, and you can no longer receive calls or dial out.

      On the bright side they never crash, and you've never seen pong like this before!

    2. Re:Yes, but... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "will they run Linux?? XD"

      Ugh. Talk about masochsistic.

      2..2..2.. c.. ok... now 3..3..3.. d... crap, how do you make a slash!?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  14. Well... by slapout · · Score: 1

    I know Powerpoint Considered Harmful, but I didn't realize that this was what they meant!

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  15. Great... by grahamsz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What does this do for battery life. I like that my current Samsung phone is small and runs for most of a week without any recharging.

    OTOH i have to recharge my ipod every day that i want to use it (although it is a pretty old one).

    Do "consumers" really want this kind of convergence? I know i dont.

    1. Re:Great... by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      I don't for sure. How many times have I seen iPods connected to the big stereo at a friend's house, playing music while some mobile phones rang repeatedly when more friends called. What to do with a phone-integrated music player, leave the room to talk? Turn down the music? Disconnect that thing from the stereo, go out of the crowded, noisy area to a room where you can talk and be understood?

      Not exactly an out-of-world scenario, eh? I wouldn't want to talk with loud music playing in the background, much less stopping the music for everyone else.

      Highly impractical, I say. And a continously refreshing RAM and spinning HDD doesn't quite add standby time and robustness to it.

  16. Re:wowser! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It needs it to run Windows :)

  17. Re:wowser! by DeathFlame · · Score: 1

    Hey, now think about this for future webservers. Just run the webserver on a phone!

    Of coure there are issues such as bandwidth costs and connection speeds, but I'm talking future, or maybe in select locations where highspeed mobile bandwidth is available.

    No more RIAA or MPAA knocking on the door, instead they're putting there hand in your pocket looking for your phone that our hosting your bittorent tracker on.

  18. Nice, free advertising by Tri0de · · Score: 1

    Gee, looks like they got some free word of mouth advertising *AND* market research. Pretty smart.

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
  19. HDD Music Smartphone by Brandon+One · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The HDD Music Smartphone is by far the most interesting of the three leaked models. Besides it running Windows it looks like a promising little device. Almost seems suited as a competitor to the iPod and iTunes. As seen by the 3GB hard drive, name, and online music service (whatever that means). The hard drive and MPEG-4 compatibility would also enable it to be a handheld video player. Very interesting.

    1. Re:HDD Music Smartphone by MrDomino · · Score: 1

      What are you, nuts? A phone that just happens to have a 3GB hard drive and the ability to play music as competition with a full-fledged music player? I'd look more towards things like the Rio Karma for iPod competition, myself.

    2. Re:HDD Music Smartphone by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      Music phone will takeoff if they allow you to download songs over the air. With a ipod you can only buy songs while at your computer, but with a cell phone you can do it wherever, there's going to be a lot of impulse buying.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    3. Re:HDD Music Smartphone by Octagon+Most · · Score: 1

      "Almost seems suited as a competitor to the iPod and iTunes. As seen by the 3GB hard drive, name, and online music service (whatever that means)."

      We currently refer to any such device as an "iPod Killer." Maybe you didn't get the memo.

  20. Biggest revelation by artemis67 · · Score: 1

    is that these new tech gadgets also connect two people on a wireless network after punching in some sort of code on the built-in numeric keypad, allowing them to use a sort of "voice chat".

    Hopefully this feature won't interfere with the hard drive MP3 player and the 2 megapixel camera.

  21. Re:wowser! by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Man, you can find people's entire financial statements on Google if you know what to look for. I once found a company's entire pay-to-train sessions on Google because the idiots had left it in an open directory. We're talking seven or eight classes that cost $400 a head to attend.

    This "oopsy" does not surprise me in the least. Spend enough time in the corporate world with typical PHBs, and you will get used to hearing how such-and-such simple and important security task isn't important because "that's never gonna happen", so we shouldn't "waste time on it". This is it what happens when managers run technical systems rather than tech people.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  22. Mirrors - Just in Case by Kinetic · · Score: 1

    Just in case of the likely Slashdotting on this one, MirrorDot has the mirrors. As always. :)

    --
    ~Jay
  23. Sell Order by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
    Samsung phones have appeared online including three that used Windows Mobile.

    "Bob? Sell all my Samsung stock, fast!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  24. Beware Verizon! by Dragoon412 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And no doubt, Verizon will pick one up, except the hard drive capacity will be reduced to 1GB, and it will have its multimedia features and bluetooth removed. Of course, they'll compensate by branding it with a five Verizon logos on the outside, and 3 Verizon banners in the software that can't be changed/removed, and the clock will spent as much time displaying "Verizon Wireless" as it does the time.

    Seriously, I'm impressed by these phones, but they're like auto manufacturers' concept cars. And just like I go to the Detroit Auto Show every year and drool over the amazing concept cars (i.e. last year's Eclipse), when the things finally do hit the road, they're stripped-down, boring, tame, overpriced, and not at all exciting.

    The same thing happens with cell phones (especially after Verizon has a hand in crippling them a la the Audiovox CDM-8900). They're exciting now, sure, but when these come out, they'll be advertised at $400, but existing customers will have to pay $800 for them, and half the features will have mysteriously vaporized.

    Don't get me wrong, I'd love the idea of having one unit that takes the place of an iPod and a PDA and a cell phone in an elegant design, but it'll be another 3-4 years before we have those, and if Verizon, Sprint and the like have any say in it, they'll never be affordable to the masses.

    1. Re:Beware Verizon! by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      Verizon's 2 year upgrade plan for phones gives you a better deal on phones then new customers. You get $150 credit on any phone. I got my phone for $20 less than the lowest advertised priced.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    2. Re:Beware Verizon! by Canthros · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Somebody's bitter about shelling out for a phone with Bluetooth, I see.

      --
      Canthros
    3. Re:Beware Verizon! by sbjordal · · Score: 0

      The specs show that they'll be triband GSM phones. Verizon is not GSM. Ofcourse, the phones can change or they make a Verizon version, but *those* specs make the incompatible with Verizon

    4. Re:Beware Verizon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's $100.

    5. Re:Beware Verizon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're correct. At least, I know my 2 year contract is up in Feb, and I'm only getting one hundred dollars off my next phone.

      Oh, well. V710, here I come!

    6. Re:Beware Verizon! by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

      Switch to T-Mobile USA.

      The network is 1. GSM, 2. 1900Mhz only. This means that you can order a phone from Europe or Asian way in advance of the US release.

      I got a Nokia 7610 for $380 in September. It's out now on Cingular for something like $320 with a two year contract.

      You won't have service in the middle of nowhere though. That doesn't bother me since I spend most of my time in cities and the suburbs around them. It does bother some people. It's all about what you want; I want cool phones without having to wait for the US release.

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    7. Re:Beware Verizon! by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Nopt that a European-only phone would do you any good in thew USA, T-Mobile or not - it's 1800MHz over there, not 1900.

    8. Re:Beware Verizon! by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

      Most European phones are tri-band (900/1800/1900). Cingular uses 850 so you have to wait for the 850/1800/1900 version.

      My point still stands.

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
  25. Can hear them complaining... by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    ... oh dear now everybody knows what cool phones we will se selling shortly. Oh my, maybe they even delay the purchase of a new phone to get one of our cool ones. And these may not even include all the features that are mentioned in the powerpoint slides, because hey, they are unofficial. WE never released these, they were stolen. Oh my lord, all this free advertising we now get, it isn't fair...

  26. Oh no! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Gosh! The super secret super squirrel plans for another phone loaded with useless shit slipped out the barn door. Unleash the ED-209 suqadron! Leave no hard drive unturned! We shall hunt down the thieves and, um, oh...

    Er...

    *sigh*

    2005 is going to be another year of boring, stupid tech crap, isn't it?

    500 MHz processor and it will still have the call quality of a tin can and string. Can't wait to see the battery life.

    Flying cars. Personal jetpacks. Robot maids. Vacations in space. They promised me those things as a kid. THEY PROMISED, DAMMIT! Martin Landau was supposed to be on the Moon by now!

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately Richard Nixon got elected and we were thrown 40 years into the past.

  27. Voice Communication Feature? by Ionizer7 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I read through all the features and it never mentioned we can call and communicate with these devices. There was alot of other neat things though! (suppose to be funny, sorry if it isn't)

  28. About Time by halo8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    To all thoes "I just want a phone phone" or thoes "Will i be able to get reception in my apt in metropolitan area #5?" to you i say.. STFU! this phone isnt for you.

    i hate taking my mp3 player, cellphone, pda, and ocasionaly camera with me. The first 3 i cant leave the house with. taking public trasport is a hassel every time i enter or leave a subay i have to pay 4 pockets just to make sure i didnt forget anything. its a hassel.

    i for one welcome our combo-cellphone-do-everything overlords

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    1. Re:About Time by ppp · · Score: 1

      i for one welcome our combo-cellphone-do-everything

      Until it breaks - and it will, often.

    2. Re:About Time by TheGavster · · Score: 3, Funny

      hate taking my mp3 player, cellphone, pda, and ocasionaly camera with me. The first 3 i cant leave the house with.
      I presume you meant 'without', given the rest of the post.

      I can see needing a cellphone, if you have an always-on-call job or something, but seriously, are you incapable of leaving your music to pop down to the store? Do you really need a PDA everywhere you go? There's this wonderful invention, only been around for 2 or 3 millenia, called paper. You can jot a note, a list for the store, readable in direct sunlight, lasts on one charge for 50-100 years.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  29. only 15% of customers use most of the features by gelfling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Study after study shows that only about 15% of the customers use most of the high end features that their phones provide. I for one find email absurdly difficult to use. I don't have a camera phone but I appreciate the ability to receive a picture someone else sends me - like the exact shape of that curtain rod bracket while I'm in the store for example.

    Moreover most people over the age of 15 don't really consume ringtones, wall paper and screen savers.

    OK text messaging is ok but again, data entry is a fucking chore even with T9.

    But the reason that all these phones come with teleporters and sex aids is because phones are basically loss leaders for the service providers. They give most of them away for free so there is little incentive for phone builders to build better FREE phones. Instead they just pile on more features to justify the extra 50 - 100 - 150 dollars per unit because that is the only way they will actually make any money at all.

    But I really don't understand what all the criticism is about. For the stated $25 a month you can get a plain jane prepaid candybar phone that gets calls and makes calls. I had one for over a year no problem - a Nokia 6631 and I could limit the spending by simply prepaying any amount I wished, no bills no problem.

    Maybe all the critics should look into that.

    In the meantime I think these new Samsungs here are a good fist stab at convergence. If I can get rid of my phone, PDA, camera and MP3 player in one clip and replace them with one device I can insure through the phone company and I can synch it and back it up with my PC I'm pretty far along the way to getting rid of a lot of complexity I'd rather not live with.

    Maybe all the specs aren't up to what each of the devices on their own can do (Camera rez, audio codec, battery life) but they will be. The first Palmpilot phones were about $1000 now they are $300.

    But what I'd like to see is more business oriented and common sense features and fewer teenage features.

    1. Re:only 15% of customers use most of the features by cybrthng · · Score: 1, Informative

      Do you really cary all that crap with you all the time? Do you really listen to MP3's and have a PDA in your pocket when your going to the grocery store and need to call home to figure out if its swiss or provolone cheese?

      Convergence smergence. It's a phone. I pay for cellular service that sucks ass (nextel) and a phone that can play games and do everything else it doesn't need to do very well.

      People aren't complaining becaus they don't want the features of these phones - they're complaining because they're gimmicks and not actual uses for the phone.

      Fix the range, allow blue tooth to login to your home base station to use VoIP or landline service. Standardize on chargers, standardize on car adaptors, increase battery life, increase rnage and most importantly manage the services better so on christmas, new years, holidays and during emergencies cell phones actually f'n work.

    2. Re:only 15% of customers use most of the features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreover most people over the age of 15 don't really consume ringtones, wall paper and screen savers.

      Where do you get your information? My experience (I work for a primarily business-focused wireless carrier with few subscribers in the 15-year-old segment) clearly points to the contrary. There are plenty of people over the age of 15 buying ringtones, wallpapers and screensavers. it's quite a profitable business, actually.

    3. Re:only 15% of customers use most of the features by gelfling · · Score: 1

      do I carry all that crap around? most of the time 2 or three devices, or I carry one or two and leave the other in the car.

      Yes I'll admit that coverage and range are a problem. I'm Sprint PCS and I'm often in digital roaming or worse all over town which is a pain.

      Bluetooth? yeah whatever connects to the PC - I don't care, I don't care if it's a cable either. I don't care about Voip over cell. I would like to be able to connect the cell handset to my home landline service and use its connection with or without my cell phone number or landline number whichever is easier.

      Don't care about powerplugs - everybody at home is responsible for their own and I don't want to own that problem of keeping track of it for them nor do I want them to lose my charger for me either. Don't care about battery standardization - longer life would be good, I said that before.

      Service? drop Nextel or come over to Sprint - connection quality is not that good, or as good as ATT but with ATT I almost never got a dial tone. Within Sprint it goes through all the time. But the sound quality is like a WW2 bomber pilot movie.

      Generally the phone fit and finish should be better or, at least have more field rugged models like the Nextels that are all rubber coated and whatnot. Kids drop phones.

    4. Re:only 15% of customers use most of the features by shic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're absolutely right - we share a common sense of priority - sadly the phone manufacturers do not... I've a good idea why not.

      A couple of years ago I splashed out on a Nokia 8310 having spent several years on the familiar treadmill where no phone would physically last a whole year. Flimsy designs left me with broken aerials; cracked screens and batteries which lost contact with the phone if they managed to retain charge for a whole day. In contrast the 8310 has proved a solid performer - it still retains charge for a week (making/receiving very few calls) and save a few minor scratches remains "as new". The phone is conveniently small, lightweight - and has all but one feature I need today. The missing feature: wireless hands-free for my car to allow me to legally make or receive calls when sitting in a queue of traffic... even if I didn't think of the phone before I set off. The only serious contender seems to be the Nokia 6230 - which (as far as I can tell) is both larger and has a shorter battery life.

      Bluetooth has been available for years and I assumed 24 months of development would allow me to choose a phone and car kit with ease to replace my 8310... I was amazed. The new ranges have shorter battery lives, are more bulky and only a select few support blue-tooth... progress? I suspect I would find a camera useful on some occasions - and I think the idea of transferring personal documents on an MMC card is neat, but it doesn't justify an increase in size or weight, nor will I accept a decrease in battery life. I am left cold by colour screens and would swap the "GUI" interface for the old-fashioned one I'm familiar with in an instant.

      Like yourself, I'd love to integrate my mobile's phonebook with my landline phone, but I suspect this desire isn't shared by the mobile networks, and hence (by way of commercial pressure) not shared by phone manufacturers either. I'm sure I'm not the only one who uses my mobile to make calls when I'm home merely because I can't be bothered to re-enter a phone number... an open interface to the mobile phonebook would likely threaten this revenue.

    5. Re:only 15% of customers use most of the features by argent · · Score: 1

      For the stated $25 a month you can get a plain jane prepaid candybar phone that gets calls and makes calls.

      Where?

      I've been trying to find a cheap low-power long-standby mono "it's just a damn phone" "bar" like my old Nokia 6100 forever. They don't seem to make them any more... at the very least they all have battery-eating color screens.

  30. Why hard drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why throw anything mechanical into a pda-like device?
    Capacity as an argument doesn't hold tight - current mobile phones like MS' smartphones or even Nokia's 6230 can use memory cards upto a gigabyte.
    By the time Samsung releases these phones, memory cards will have increased in capacity.

  31. MOD PARENT DOWN - TUBGIRL SIG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy has (or perhaps had, if he's gotten wind of the coming down mods) a link in his sig that opens pop ups that spawn more of themselves. It managed to get through Firefox's (1.0) pop up stopper, so don't go trying it even if you think you're safe.

  32. Leaked? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Gee, I can't think of a better way to create a buzz about a product than someone "stealing" your "confidential" plans about it and then "leaking" them onto the internet.

    Bravo Samsung PR. Brilliant strategy!

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  33. Hell yes it is. by Brandon+One · · Score: 1

    If I can combine my cell phone, PDA, and MP3 player into one than I would and get rid of the other three. So hell yes this is a competitor to the iPod, traditional cell phone, and PDA.

    1. Re:Hell yes it is. by MrDomino · · Score: 1

      So you'd sacrifice sound quality, storage space, and functionality in exchange for a phone that plays music and does your laundry for you?

    2. Re:Hell yes it is. by Harinezumi · · Score: 1

      Indeed, there's only so much space in a single set of pockets, after all.

    3. Re:Hell yes it is. by ad0gg · · Score: 1
      I sacrifice sound quality, storage space and functionality in order to save space all the time. There's no way my laptop can compete with my workstation, there's noway my mp3 player comes close to the sound quality of my home system. I have two pockets. One stores my keys, one stores my phone, I gave up my PDA because it couldn't fit in my pocket along with my phone.

      I bought my gf a digital camera for christmas, I could have bought her a camera that takes damn good pictures because it has a nice big lens. But she wouldn't use it, because it couldn't fit in her purse. Instead I had to get her a compact sony camera even though reviews says the pictures are decent but not excellent for a 5 megapixel cameras. Convience is just as important as features, quality and functionality.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  34. Music now too...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now people can hold their phones to their ears, get brain tumors and cause traffic jams and accidents without even talking to people. Add that to women and their makeup and 50% of the population will spend 90% of their time in medians b/c of stupidity......

  35. Credibility? by shoolz · · Score: 1
    In the absence of an explanation as to how the powerpoint slides were aquired, we should probably assume that this is either:
    • A marketing ploy
    • A hoax
    Sorry to be the wet blanket, but we should never allow ourselves to be fed information without credible sources. Remember The FARK hoax
  36. Phone hardware specs by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmmm 500 MHz processor. Guess that's what ya gotta do if you want to run Windows on your phone. Seems crazy though, given that I've run a database/email/file server that routinely queried 2 million-record database tables, ran dynamic mod-perl web apps and handled gigs of IMAP folders without breaking a sweat, all on a 500 MHz Celeron PC with similar specs as these superphones (except for 20 gigs of drive space).

    I'm still trying to wrap my head around WHY. If it breaks or I lose it I have no functionality.

    When I'm talking on the phone I cannot look at the screen so it would be a pain in the ass to look up info to relay to the person I'm talking to. Thus, I prefer a separate device, or at the very least a handset and some assurance I won't accidentally hang up on the person while I fiddle with things. PDA phones might be very capable, but if I were a power user I'd prefer a standalone PDA.

    I only take pictures when I'm out somewhere interesting (on vacation, etc) so it seems pointless to have one on a phone that I use all the time. There are many places where photographic equipment is banned, and that means I cannot have a camera phone for work (a lot of manufacturing facilities, generating stations, etc do not allow photography equipment inside without signing special agreements). Besides, even the best camera phones take pretty crappy pictures even compared to budget digital cams. Anyone who is even semi-serious about their pics would have a separate camera.

    MP3 player? Seems cool, but again a telephone conversation would interfere with operation. Besides, if even an ipod mini is too big for you you can get a basic player that fites nicely on a keychain now.

    Video. Puleeeze. I don't care how far technology advances, nothing needs to be watched so bad that I MUST watch it right now---on a 2-inch screen. If these phones had TV-out...well I might look again....maybe...but all we are doing is replacing gadgets with tangled cables anyways.

    I hope this superphone fad dies down a bit, and that I won't be forced to deal with unwanted features. I am just fine with a phone that makes phone calls, stores phone numbers and maybe has text messaging so I can receive alerts when I get new email. That is all I do now and nothing I've seen in these phones makes me want to do more. If they want to get me excited about a new phone...how about one with much improved reception , from a phone company that has a billing policy less complicated than spacecraft schematics.

    1. Re:Phone hardware specs by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Once again for the slow ones:

      Mhz=!Performance

      Performance= IPC*Mhz

      In a phone, you would rather like few transistors->little ipc and make up with high clockspeed because of better idle power draw (few transistors->little leakage).

      I guess a 486 would still be faster overall compared to those cpus, even if they have 10times the MHz.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Phone hardware specs by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      If it breaks or I lose it I have no functionality.

      Yeah...the same as with any other type of phone or technology.

      When I'm talking on the phone I cannot look at the screen so it would be a pain in the ass to look up info to relay to the person I'm talking to. Thus, I prefer a separate device

      So you use it as a PDA when you're not on the phone. Not everyone has constant phone calls to interrupt their PDAing.

      I only take pictures when I'm out somewhere interesting (on vacation, etc) so it seems pointless to have one on a phone that I use all the time.

      Okay, so for YOU, that's a good point. But do you think everyone uses their technology the same way you do? Is someone forcing you to buy a 'mega-feature' phone? Diversity in the marketplace is good, not bad.

      MP3 player? Seems cool, but again a telephone conversation would interfere with operation.

      You seem to constantly be on the phone. I feel sorry for you, but you should realize that not all of us are, and many of us would like one device that does lots of things well enough, rather than carrying around a bunch of specialized devices.

    3. Re:Phone hardware specs by mrycar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love my PDA Cell Phone. All of the devices it eliminated from my inventory are not missed. Only one unit to charge. (two of them if I use my Blue toothe headset)

      I have the audiovox 5600. I am not a windows lover, but i haven't seen a convergence item in any other OS, that has all of the features of this phone.

      I can't wait for the samsung prototypes.

      The issues that you mention above are not issues at all.

      I regularly use my phones as a PDA while talking. There is a thing call speakerphone, if you don't like annoying the neighbors, use a blue tooth headset.

      The camera, hey, i thought is was hokey, that was until I had to go get some goodies for a friend which couldn't be describe. A couple of quick pics back and forth allowed the camera to become a useful commodity.

      Heck I have 512MB of miniSD ram, and it stores enough songs to amuse me while waiting for an appointment or on the drive home. I wouldn't complain about more space.

      Video, another feature that can provide amusement in times of none. Not a feature that I use much of, but oh well.

      I think the convergence is great. I want my superphone. I want my email to arrive to my cell phone. No need for a blackberry. I want to not have to charge a PDA, one source for phone numbers when mobile.

      Coverage is something that will always need improved. My superphone has just as good of coverage as my old plain jane.

      Hooray for super phones

      --
      Gator/Claria is Spyware.
    4. Re:Phone hardware specs by Mike+Rubits · · Score: 1

      Proof positive: Software Quake runs at 30FPS on the very latest 624MHz machines. 15FPS on a 400MHz XScale.

    5. Re:Phone hardware specs by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      Your arguments seem contrived. Yes, if your phone break, so breaks your pda, mp3 player and camera. Think about it the other way though, if you trip and fall and smash stuff in your jacket or on your belt, then you only have to replace one thing instead of 4 that might break all at the same time. Also, there's insurance on cell phones, none on the others.

      As for interrupting your calls, most of these phones have speakerphones and "driving modes". They also have headsets that can be used while using the phone for other things. Do you really WANT to be listening to MP3's while you're on the phone? Does it matter if the phone call interrupts your song?

      Great, a convergence unit is not for you. That doesn't mean they're not for me, and more like it doesn't mean all phones will be convergence phones.

    6. Re:Phone hardware specs by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      Yeah...the same as with any other type of phone or technology.

      Yeah--except that I just can't make phone calls, and I still have a camera and PDA that DO work.

      So you use it as a PDA when you're not on the phone. Not everyone has constant phone calls to interrupt their PDAing.

      Not everyone, but I'm not everyone. There are times when I DO have constant cellphone calls. And oddly enough, the time that I am most likely to be using the PDA is...when I'm retrieving information to relay to a person I'm talking to on the phone.

      But do you think everyone uses their technology the same way you do? Is someone forcing you to buy a 'mega-feature' phone? Diversity in the marketplace is good, not bad.

      I agree, but the problem is that these features are creeping into the mainstream segment, and the market is degradating to the state where Wintel PCs are now. I do NOT want buying a cellphone to be that complex. There is a sizeable market for a low-cost, simple computer but for some reason manufacturers can't seem to capture that market. There is NO NEED AT ALL for a gigahertz-clock-speed, many-hundred-megabytes RAM P4-class machine if all you do is personal word processing, spreadsheets, contact lists, email and web surfing--and even a lot of games. Aside from spelunking for used equipment everywhere you CANNOT find a simple, new machine easily. Even Walmart's PC is more than many people need to do what they want and that's the closest thing.

      The same goes for phones--all that crap is often overkill. I'm willing to bet that although not EVERYONE uses technology like me that there are a enough that do that would lament the extinction of the basic cellphone, especially since all the added cruft seems to cut into the potential battery life and reception quality.

      You seem to constantly be on the phone. I feel sorry for you, but you should realize that not all of us are

      Don't feel sorry, it is part of my job, and when I'm done work I just turn it off and deal with the missed calls the next morning. Right now, it's nice that I can do that and still have a digital camera for the vacations or an MP3 player that I can take with me jogging, etc. and leave the phone at home.

    7. Re:Phone hardware specs by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Think about it the other way though, if you trip and fall and smash stuff in your jacket or on your belt, then you only have to replace one thing instead of 4 that might break all at the same time. Also, there's insurance on cell phones, none on the others.

      1. I don't carry all four with me at all times. I generally have no need for more than two of those at once

      2. You can get insurance on anything you want. My insurance covers cell phones, laptops, PDAs and digital cameras. If I had an iPod that I really valued it could cover that too I suppose.

      As for interrupting your calls, most of these phones have speakerphones and "driving modes". They also have headsets that can be used while using the phone for other things.

      1. Speakerphones do not allow for privacy.

      2. Sometimes you don't want to cover your ears with a headset. Wires are a nusiance. Wireless bluetooth ones require separate battery/charger and bluetooth has some security concerns if not set up right.

      Great, a convergence unit is not for you. That doesn't mean they're not for me, and more like it doesn't mean all phones will be convergence phones.

      1. Not only is it not for me, in some things it isn't for most people and is a niche market. If it were really appealing then set-top convergence boxes would be much more commonplace today.

      2. I HOPE it means all phones will not be "convergence phones", but it could happen, given the kind of industry we are talking about. People buy these phones through cellular providers. Have you tried to get ANYTHING "basic" from a cell-co? Root canals are more pleasant! NO I don't want the colour phone with the camera, thanks. NO I don't want the 400 anytime minutes leasure plan fro only $49.95 (*plus access fee..blah blah fine print). They ALWAYS try the upsell, and while they are not too pushy there, if you try to go LOWER than their widely advertised "basic" plan it becomes a serious battle.

      I can just imagine: colour cellphones with cameras and games and crappy reception are cool gimicky things popular with teenage girls and make the cell-co boatloads of money. Marketing PHB sees the $ numbers regardless of the demographic and soon the "base plan" offers the colour, game-filled cam-phone, and if you want something basic then you are pulling teeth even more to get it. If you don't get a discount for getting a plainer phone at that point so help me....

    8. Re:Phone hardware specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "MP3 player? Seems cool, but again a telephone conversation would interfere with operation. Besides, if even an ipod mini is too big for you you can get a basic player that fites nicely on a keychain now"

      A cell phone + an iPod mini is considerably bigger than a cell phone without an iPod mini.

  37. AAC support -- finally! by igorsway · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am pleased to see that someone besides Apple is supporting this codec on a music player. With bluetooth and aac support, who needs an ipod?

    1. Re:AAC support -- finally! by Major+Hazard · · Score: 0

      My Motorola A835 has been out since '03 and supports/records in AAC.

      --
      Intel Inside. Idiot Outside.
  38. MOD PARENT DOWN - TUBGIRL SIG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy has (or perhaps had, if he's gotten wind of the coming down mods) a link in his sig that opens pop ups that spawn more of themselves. It managed to get through Firefox's (1.0) pop up stopper, so don't go trying it even if you think you're safe. Fucker.

  39. Not really a leak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    As far as I understand it, the big issue with phones is that they have to be approved by the FCC as they're regulated radio devices. Images and specification documents become public government documents once the phone is submitted for approval.

    And entire websites (such as Phone Scoop) have grown around this advance information. They typically have specifications and images about 6 months before they hit the market.

    For example, here's the news posting on Phone Scoop about those Samsung phones (including at least one model number). Follow the "Full Story.." link in that article for the FCC filing.

  40. threaten to cancel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you tell Rogers that you are going to cancel because their service is too expensive you will be passed to customer relations rep who will offer you some very basic inexpensive plans. You won't get all the fun features ofcourse. The plans are meant for people who carry a cell phone for emergencies.

    1. Re:threaten to cancel by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I have the 200 anytime minute 20$/mo plan...

      then you add on 6.25$ "license fee", 1$ 911 fee and tax... boom 37$/mo plan. They don't do cheaper then 20$/mo.

      My week long trip to france cost me 520$ in fees and I used maybe three-four hours of talk time. At roughly 1.84$ a minute it was "well worth it". [Specially since it was a business trip and I ended up paying 420$ of it on my own...]

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:threaten to cancel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't do cheaper then 20$/mo.

      They do. It is not advertised. And you can't ask for it. These special plans have to offered to you as far as I can tell.

      I am on the $15/month plan. There is not 6.25 access fee either. It is only slightly more convenient then pay as you go.

  41. Hi! Hello! HELLO! by SwimsWithTheFishes · · Score: 1

    What?

    I'm calling you on my new Samsung phone powered by Windowstm.

    What?

    Canyouhearmenow!!! Bzz...click...silence

    I can hardly wait.

    --
    *click**beep**beep* Scotty, One to Mod up!
  42. Not FairPlay though!! by riversky · · Score: 1

    Apple's AAC files from iTunes won't play because this device (everyone except iPod) will not be able to decode Apple's FairPlay DRM. This is what Apple uses to protect the iTunes/iPod/Music store system. Without FairPlay they would be eaten up my others.

    1. Re:Not FairPlay though!! by igorsway · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Apple's FairPlay DRM only apply to songs downloaded from their music store? I didn't think the songs that are ripped from from CD and converted to AAC by Itunes had any DRM.

  43. Nokia by khrtt · · Score: 1

    Nuff said:-). I dropped my old 3360 out of a 3rd story windows, and then played hockey with it, and it still works.

  44. I have never heard such a dull story by andy314159pi · · Score: 1

    This story could actually kill you from boredom, the surgeon general reports.
    Commander Taco needs to let somebody else post stuff.

    1. Re:I have never heard such a dull story by andy314159pi · · Score: 1

      Is there a way to filter out these 'filler' stories? I have tried to configure the homepage so that it doesn't tell me crap about consumer electronics like WALKIE-TALKIE-MP3-CELL-PHONE-WITH CAMERA. It doesn't have that option, though.

  45. "Intenna" ??? by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 1

    I seriously doubt this is a real job. Note that "antenna" was spelled incorrectly, leading me to believe that this was just some project that someone made, building it up around some pictures. Samsung wouldn't display this to potential vendors; it's way to unprofessional not to proofread it.

    1. Re:"Intenna" ??? by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 1

      Just kidding. Figured it out.

    2. Re:"Intenna" ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      internal antenna probably

    3. Re:"Intenna" ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's way to unprofessional not to proofread it.

      unlike your post...

    4. Re:"Intenna" ??? by taycalmac · · Score: 0

      Ah...the sweet irony of commenting on the quality of advertising and yet, not quite having the skills to do so. It is "too unprofessional". Like "too stupid" or "too uneducated". On the other hand, I'm going "to be sick".

      --
      A clean chord is a happy chord...
  46. Screensavers Live at CES Commercials.. by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else seen the commercial with the two sitting outside eating lunch and the one is describing his new phone.. the description he gave almost fits to a T the Samsung "Thor" concept phone. And if I remember the commercial right.. even looks like it as well.

  47. Had to go find out the current conversion.. by Otto · · Score: 1

    So basically you get it for like $9.50 US. Now I admit that there's likely no deals in the US with that low of a monthly fee (except prepaid, maybe), but that cost seems significantly higher than it's really worth.

    Simple example: my cell phone is roughly $40 US a month. I get 600 minutes a month with rollover (meaning the minutes add up and I can use them in later months instead), unlimited night/weekend use, no long distance or roaming fees of any kind, unlimited SMS, and basically unlimited everything else. No wireless internet because I found that to be really, really useless. No video, but why would I want video?

    Now, I grant you that 500 minutes for $10 vs. 600 for $40 seems a bit of a weird comparison, but the thing is that I got the phone for free ($250 phone), the minutes rollover basically for as long as I have the account so I never have any form of shortages there (I've got enough minutes to talk a couple weeks straight without paying extra, had the account a long time, shifted to a lower usage one when the minutes were banked up enough). And I have no land line so that's saving me $25 a month.

    Upshot is that for $15 more a month over a landline I can take my phone with me, anywhere in the US (never been anywhere out of coverage and I've pretty much been everywhere), and so forth.

    So it's worth it to me. But those bells and whistles? They're not worth it. Hell, SMS messaging is almost useless as it is. I use it occassionally, maybe once of twice a year. But for the most part it's not worth it. Europe is just different, man. They embraced the bells and whistles. SMS messaging is big there. I've never even heard of MMS messaging, but I assume it's getting big. They're pushing video, wireless internet, all that stuff.

    Over here in the US, few people really use all this crap. Yes, the bleeding edge do, but the majority of people complain about the actual voice functionality not working or being out of range or something. The coverage maps are usually the most important factor when buying a cell phone here. Text messaging is seen as a thing for kids to use, most people only use it for pager services or to have the latest sports scores delivered to them. They certainly don't use it for chatting.

    They're still trying to get the US consumer to care about text messaging (witness the sidekick commercials, which is like a text messenger device with a mini keyboard). So it'll be a long, long time before they can get them to care about all the other bells and whistles.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Had to go find out the current conversion.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...you are aware that those rollover minutes expire after 12 months?

    2. Re:Had to go find out the current conversion.. by Otto · · Score: 1

      Depends on your plan. They don't have to. Mine don't. :)

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  48. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you... by Corf · · Score: 1
    i hate taking my mp3 player, cellphone, pda, and ocasionaly camera with me. The first 3 i cant leave the house with. taking public trasport is a hassel every time i enter or leave a subay i have to pay 4 pockets just to make sure i didnt forget anything. its a hassel.

    ...Samsung's target demographic. Note the subject's text-message inspired spelling and desire for still more electronic toys. Welcome to the 21st Century, brought to you by Far East manufacturing and effective marketing departments.

    --
    not a flame, just the way it is

    --
    The pain was excruciating and the scarring is likely permanent, but that just means it's working.
  49. Advice to longime cellphone users like you by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    I long for the days when I used to be able to get a simple cell phone with a simple interface, contact phone book, and good reception -- for less than $25 dollars a month!

    Amen, brotha! But don't dispair quite yet, you can still get such a deal--except there is a catch:

    * you have to be at the end of a 2 year or longer contract

    * you have to be fully paid--and may have to have a good payment history with the provider

    * not requirement, but you get "bonus points" for being a "good customer" in general--ie. you have had the same phone through the whole contract (no lost/stolen/damaged phones, etc).

    * you must take the time to actually visit their store/office/etc. The plans you get on-line or over the phone completely STINK.

    Phone companies treat their basic plans like "dirty little secrets" they pull out when they are desperate to keep you. Be polite but assertive, and bargain with them like you would at a Tiajuana flea market.

    My parents got lots of practice by sitting through sales pitches for timeshares in Florida and British Columbia. You have to listen to a sleazy, high-pressure guy for a couple hours and pretend you are interested in the wonderful amenities when all you *really* are after is the free TV or 3-day ski pass you "won". It is the same when your cellphone contract comes up for renewal. The longer you resist buying the more incredible the deal gets.

    My mother used this tactic last month with Telus Mobility when her contract came up. The salespeople probably thought "nice old retiree lady--easy commission" but they were wrong. They go through the following steps:

    1. Offer you the same overpriced plan they give joe schmoe off the street, but get a nifty colour phone upgrade. You respond: sorry, I don't need a colour phone and it is still too much for my budget.

    2. Offer new but basic phone, less daytime minutes but still unlimited evening/weekend or something like that. Still $40/month or so but a bit cheaper. You: but I use even less than that, can't I get something without the daytime minutes?

    3. (grumble grumble) Offers pre-paid/pay-as-you-go. Points out emphatically the convoluted process of buying minutes (picking up cards, conditions where minutes do not carry over etc etc) hoping you'll relent and at least pick #2. You: no dice--that's too inconvenient, who would ever put up with that crap if they didn't have to?

    4. (in desperation to keep you from signing with Bell) Pleeeeze stay with us--we value your business. Here is our new basic phone, no evenings or weekends free but anytime minutes for $25 canadian per month.

    Takes an hour of haggling but it's worth it.

  50. Mmmmm...Windows Mobile by SunFan · · Score: 0, Troll


    How soon until we see the Farter worm that injects a payload of an ever-so-special Midi ring tone?

    --
    -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  51. How many ways can you spell V-A-P-O-R-W-A-R-E? by Devlin-du-GEnie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... cus' Samsung has been sooo quick to release the SGH-i505. Whoops, I mean the SGH-i550. These Palm two smartphone models were first announced at a trade show in October 2003. I still haven't seen either one in the wild.

    Buy a Treo. You can actually go to a store and touch one of those. It's loads easier to type on than a cloud of pretty, hot air from Samsung.

  52. Virgin Mobile Minutes don't expire, $6.66/mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $0.25/min for first 10 min each day
    $0.10/min after that

    If you use it rarely, it's a great plan.

  53. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All we need is for some B.E.T. executive to see that post. Help us all.

    You, sir, are funny like a Manheim Steamroller Drum and Bass remix

  54. Re:Mirror (Now with Mirrordot Link) by me+at+werk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mirrordot.org is Groovy.

    --
    For context, click Parent.
  55. Nokia 9500? by sjofi · · Score: 1

    Nokia 9500 has WiFi and you should be able to do voip, although I have no idea why anyone would want to use power hungry WiFi on mobile device.

  56. then why are phones not carrier portable? by Sleepy · · Score: 1
    The cell phone companies may be listening, but they don't care. Customers like you aren't worth anything to them. Competition between providers continues to force them to provide more and more airtime for less and less money. If all you want to do is talk on your phone they aren't going to make much profit off of you.

    Your point about where carriers make the most value is fine, but it's not fair to suffest this is the primary reason.

    It goes back to what you said... they don't care. They don't have to. The cellphone services in the US are a cartel. They mirror each other's behavior and policies.

    Worst of all, they all engage in anticompetitive restrictions such as requiring you to buy a phone that only works with their service. People take the path of least resistance... if their cell provider locks their phone to the network, then switching providers is much more complicated than making a phone call.

    So we cant easily shop around for deals on the phone WE bought. As a side effect of all this, the us is Third World when it comes to cell phone technology. All the cool phones in Asia won't be found here for another 18 months (I expect some delay since that is the point of origin, but it won't take 18 months to get a new Sony gizmo here).

    1. Re:then why are phones not carrier portable? by quigonn · · Score: 1

      As a side effect of all this, the us is Third World when it comes to cell phone technology.

      You are so absolutely right. Actually, I was shocked when I saw a map of the US showing huge areas without any base stations for mobile phones at all, and the rest is splintered up between CDMA and GMS. And does routing SMS between different mobile phone providers work already?

      I mean, Europe has never been a technology leader (nor is today, and I'm saying this is as a European), but I was really surprised that the US are so much behind with these technologies.

      On a side note: I always wonder how much Europe is behind e.g. Japan, and how Japanese tourists think about our stone-old mobile phones. ;-)

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    2. Re:then why are phones not carrier portable? by IllogicalStudent · · Score: 1

      There is a very simple explanation to why the US and Canada is like this: Copper. We have a lot of it, and our land-line phone system is highly developed in most areas. The telcos (who operate both cellular and land-lard services) simply dragged their feet, unwilling to put up new cell towers when the old landline towers already cost them a bundle. In contrast to this, in much of Europe, the number of poles weren't as high. so the companies decided to put up cellular towers. Infrastricture.

      --
      But Maaa! Everyone else has a .sig !
    3. Re:then why are phones not carrier portable? by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      I was shocked when I saw a map of the US showing huge areas without any base stations for mobile phones at all

      It's all about population density. Europe has a lot more people crammed into a much smaller space, thus it's cheaper and easier to deploy more cell phone towers. In the United States there are places where you can drive for hours and never see another person. I've been to a couple of places where there wasn't even radio, AM or FM. There are some town remote enough not to have land-line phone service. Either they don't have phones at all, or they use radio relays.

      It's a big country with a lot to see. I've tried to see a lot of it, and my experience has been that when the cell phone towers disappear, you find the prettiest parts of the country.

  57. More features == More things to break by alc6379 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    A few years ago, I got a little Nokia phone, I forget the model number of it. It was a little gray number, and it worked with my PDA through IrDA. And it made phone calls. It was one piece, no flippy-foldy parts, and it worked great for me. I even ran it over with a truck in the mud, and left it out in the snow for 3 days. The only way I found it was because somebody was calling me, and I heard it ringing out in the yard.

    Where's my phone that I can just throw in my pocket, rough it up, and still have it work right? With all of these flip-phones, slide phones and their touch screens, camera lenses and hard drives, they don't seem like they're going to hold up to being bumped, jarred, or just tossed into a cargo pocket for a quick bike ride down to the convenience store. I love little gadgets as much as anyone else, but I'm not always going to be able to attach the device to a belt clip, and I don't always care to, anyways.

    Can't they work on a good old phone that I could accidentally mistake for a hockey puck, and still have it work right?

    --
    I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    1. Re:More features == More things to break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you need a ruggedized application. not a consumer level cell phone.

    2. Re:More features == More things to break by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a Nokia like that, then my company changed carriers and replaced the fat, dumb, happy Nokia with the monochrome screen, no value-added features that I'd have to pay Verizon extra every month to actually use, and good enough battery life that I could forget to charge it for a week and it was still working...

      Now I have an LG flip-phone with a color screen, "Get It Now", and all kinds of features that ... "not only don't I want them, but I can't imagine anyone wanting them" (thank you William Gibson), and I still haven't figured out how to completely disable the unusable-and annoying-voice-recognition with the easy one-finger activation that you can turn on if you unhook the phone from the belt clip the wrong way...

      And if I go a day without charging it turns itself off... wasting enough power to keep it on standby until I get home by playing a cute little movie and tune to tell me it's out of power.

      Christ.

      Whoever designed this needs better meds.

    3. Re:More features == More things to break by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      maybe you need a ruggedized application. not a consumer level cell phone.

      Why? Because I carry my phone in my pocket? Because every now and then, I drop stuff, like most normal people?

      I'm not working on an oil rig. I don't try to use my phone as a door stop, or to chock the wheel of a vehicle I'm working on. It's not like I'm trying to make mobile calls in the Congo. I just can't stand a phone that a bump here and there can result in permanent damage to the unit.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    4. Re:More features == More things to break by Repton · · Score: 1

      I've got a Nokia 5140. The design goal here is basically a phone that can take the knocks.

      I haven't "road tested" mine, but a friend who works for Vodafone (a mobile phone company) here has tales of what this model of phone has survived.

      <shrug> I like it, anyway.

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  58. ANYCALL by paradesign · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please note: If they are marked with "Anycall" they will not be released here in the States, or Europe for that matter. Only Korea. Plus, phones with these specs are not uncommon there currently. They already have phones with hard drives in them, as well as 5mp cameras (that take great pics)! Theres a slim chance that if one of the US CDMA carriers adopts the Korean Wideband CDMA network infrastructure for their 3G rollout, we may see them here, but that dosent look likely, and i can only immagine how much Verizon would fuck you over with charges. $.50 per HDD spool up sounds reasonable, dosent it?

    --
    I want 2D games back.
    1. Re:ANYCALL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sprint/Nextel has basically said they will be going with WCDMA. So don't rule it out.

      On the other hand, that hard drive will probably follow the current ringtone trend where they sell you a 90-day licence to use the ringtone and erase it if you don't buy it again. This "license then erase" model is becoming common: DirecTV's new NDS PVRs will be erasing your TV shows at their whimsy.

      In the case of the phone, imagine buying 3 gigs worth of Itunes or Napster that you have to rebuy every month or two. The profit models on this are probably orgasmic.

  59. Re:wowser! by Xilman · · Score: 1
    Hey, now think about this for future webservers. Just run the webserver on a phone!

    Already been done, and a few years ago, by Microsoft Research.

    Go to MSR Security Research Group and scroll down to "Access Enabling Wallets on User Controlled Devices".

    Paul

    --
    Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate
  60. Time to Upgrade by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

    Drat. If the phones are at 500MHz it might be time to upgrade my aging 500MHz processor. It DOES have a 100MHz FSB though, so maybe I can hold off until Cingular tops them or something.

    --
    Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  61. crash by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 1

    Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition for Phone Edition

    Does that mean my cell phone will now crash as often as my PC at work does?

    1. Re:crash by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does that mean my cell phone will now crash as often as my PC at work does?

      More often. Your PC is running NT, not CE.

      I routinely reset my Pocket PC phone edition before placing a call, because otherwise it was likely to crash while trying to complete it.

      I don't know why they can't just run NT on these things. We were running NT desktops on P-100s with 16M in the '90s, with 1024x768 screens, and they were FASTER than the Pocket PC (and we used to think those requirements were outrageous). Why they need to run a stripped down pre-NT-Windows-based OS on a machine with less than 1/16th the screen area, four times the RAM, and 4 times the CPU I have no idea...

    2. Re:crash by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 1

      I think there is an embeded NT. I'm pretty sure you could get that on WinTerms instead of CE.

    3. Re:crash by argent · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know theer's an embedded NT, that's not what I was asking.

      What I was getting at is why, given that Pocket PC's hardware requirements are the same order of magnitude as the *full* NT, Microsoft persists in making people run Windows CE on the bloody things instead of something based on NT...

  62. Simplicity + Bluetooth by patonw · · Score: 1

    All I want is a plain cellphone without cameras and thousands of annoying polyphonic ring tones... but one that I can use as a simple organizer with bluetooth so I can wirelessly sync my address book, calendar and notes. I don't want or need a full blown pda with a 2.4 GHz processor and 120 GB hard drives and Windows Longhorn 50-Pound-Phone edition yet phone makers keep adding more gimmicky bloat instead of making useful business devices. Why can't they just get a clue?

  63. I want an all-voice phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sick of dialing. I want to speak information into the phone and have it store and speak information back to me. Like operators used to do before they were replaced with inferior technology. Is there anything out there that does this? It seems sad that advances in telephony seem to have little to do with telephony.

  64. Damn... interesting idea! by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
    This is a very good point. If the telcos set up an easy interface to buy songs with the phone, and a reasonable price, it would be absolutely huge. People who get nostalgic for an old song they left at home might re-purchase that song while on their car trip... If it's just $1/song or something reasonable, I bet a lot of people would buy (and re-buy) songs all the time.

    This makes so much sense that I'm now wondering whether the next iPod feature will be a phone - plus some license deal with a major wireless firm to have iTunes over the air. I think there are a lot of young people who carry both an iPod and a phone everywhere, and wouldn't mind simplifying. Just an idea...

    1. Re:Damn... interesting idea! by Wicksta · · Score: 1

      Actually, O2 in the UK and Ireland offer a music download service for their XDA 2 phone and the Siemens SX1 phone (S60 based symbian phone). They have around 130,000 tracks for sale at the moment. With more and more phones supporting this kind of thing I can really see the telcos embracing this market. How long before the first one gets in bed with Apple?

  65. javelin... as seen on anime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    any anime fans notice that the javelin looks a whole lot like those in witch hunter robin?

  66. Windows Mobile 2003 by ProfitElijah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I got a Windows Mobile phone recently, in the UK it's called the SPV C500, but I think it's unbranded name is HTC Typhoon. it is an absolute dog. Shockingly poor phone. Maybe it's just because I spent a few years in the land of the mobile phone where design is so superior it's not even funny. Leave out that they sent emails not SMS or MMS, even the texting software I used to have, which wasn't predictive, was better than the turd that some developer crouched down and dropped into my phone. Here's why it sucks so hard. You'll see there are some software problems and some industrial design problems. The moral of this rant is that it's all got to be good to be a good phone.

    Hard to use joystick

    Menus and options are selected and navigated using a flat four-way joystick, with a centre-click for select. Centre-clicking isn't difficult, but when my hands are cold (and it is December, which means cold in London) it's easy to hit slightly in the wrong place and go up before clicking. With a phone as slow as this one, this can be incredibly frustrating. It leads to putting the wrong word in when writing texts, it leads to choosing the wrong program to start, and it leads to a whole world of related pain. Stylus! Please!

    Inconsistent UI

    The phone has two pointless buttons: Home and Back. They probably thought it was a really good idea to have one click to go home, but it's not. You can press the Back button a few times, or if they had been clever tie it holding down the back button in order to do that. Or at least you could have done that if the UI was consistent. In fact it seems that it's up to the apps what they do with the buttons on the phone. The camera application will only quit if you press the Hangup button! You can't even cancel though the menu!

    Slow boot

    This is simply wrong: it takes over a minute between me pressing the power button and my phone being usable as a sort of rubbish PDA, and then an arbitrarily long time to recognise the network it's on and be actually ready to use as a phone. A minute never seemed so long before I spent one staring at Windows Mobile.

    Crashes

    Another one that's simply wrong: it's a phone. It crashes. I'm pretty sure that my parents' phone doesn't crash, possibly because it's made of bakelite and fixed to the wall with rusty iron screws, but the idea is there. Make a phone which doesn't crash. If it crashes, fix it and then sell it. A phone that periodically requires me to take the battery out and wait that painful minute before I can use it again doesn't deserve an owner.

    Slow software

    Actually, I don't know if this is the software's fault or the phone's, but the experience is slow. My friend has a Palm Treo 600 (he loves it) and his mapping software flies around. He uses his stylus and just drags the map around. I have to click up, down, left or right on the stupid little joystick in order to move around the map. And whereas the mapping software he uses is an image of a streetmap, mine is a bloody vector image, with only the major roads on it, and only some of them labelled with names. It's basically fucking useless. I tried to use it to find somewhere in Soho, in the cold December rain. In less than the time it takes to boot I called my friend with an A-Z and he told me where to go.

    Button placement

    This is another simple, simple, simple cock-up. There are two buttons for adjusting the earpiece volume. Never mind that they don't work very well and that the earpiece volume goes up in about 4 steps and so could be easily managed with one button, the problem here is that you have to press them hard, which means bracing against the opposite side of the phone, where the camera is. So, while you are in a noisy call, you adjust the earpiece volume and nine times out of ten start the camera. If you recall, you can't stop the camera app in order to check your calendar or contacts without pressing the hangup button, with the predictable effect of hanging up.

    Texting s

    1. Re:Windows Mobile 2003 by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another one that's simply wrong: it's a phone. It crashes. [...] A phone that periodically requires me to take the battery out and wait that painful minute before I can use it again doesn't deserve an owner.

      That matches my experience with the T-mobile Pocket PC. I've never before had a cellphone that crashed.

      Unfortunately, I've got another once since. Company phone, they changed service, and instead of the bog-simple Nokia "bar" with minimal features and good battery life (just the way I like it... it's a frigging phone, if it can't get that part right I don't care if it has a camera, MP3 player, or 3d porn projector) I have a really clumsy LG forty-something-hundred that periodically wakes me up in the middle of the night with its "welcome" music because it crashed or got updated or something. I've also had it mysteriously eat its battery when I left it in a locker at the hospital for half an hour... I guess it was panicking because it couldn't get a signal and shorted its brains out.

      Christ.

      Here's what I want: a phone, a big battery, a little black-and-white screen that doesn't use much power, room for a couple hundred numbers, and a place I can plug in a cable from my PDA or notebook to get a TCP connection WHEN I need one. That's it.

      No bluetooth, no camera, no ringtones, no games, no wireless web, no "Get It Now" or other overpriced vendor-provided software, no downloads, uploads, wideloads, or overloads. Just a dumb connector to a dumb network I can plug my own, separate, not-tied-to-any-carrier, I-can-install-my-own-software, I-own-thank-you-very-much smart end-point that I control.

      Is that too much to ask?

  67. Want cheap and easy? Get a virgin! by gliph · · Score: 1

    OMG, does that sound like an ad for pr0n... I am in the exact same boat, and I'd like to have a simple phone that I could use for ~$20 a month or so. None of the larger carriers have anything like that, so I started looking into the pay-as-you-go services. Most of them still try to suck you dry, but it seems like VirginMobile is a good deal. You can get their basic phone is only $40 bucks to buy, and you can just add a minimum of $30 every 90 days. That comes out to around $13 bucks a month for a cell phone. Not bad in my opinion since I use mine so little, but would still like the convience of having it. It uses Sprint's service, which has always been OK for me. Hope that helps someone, its saving my wife and I about 60 bucks a month!

    Oh, and no, I don't work for them.. :)

  68. Got a link to that plan? by Catullus · · Score: 1

    I presume it's a 3 plan - what's it called and what phone do you get?

    1. Re:Got a link to that plan? by Bertie · · Score: 1

      It's an LG phone, and it's really good - big screen, good user interface (and that's coming from a professional UI designer), decent camera, 32MB memory. Only thing it doesn't have is Bluetooth. Battery life's much like any other phone unless you start using video and stuff, which hammers it, and it's not monstrously big like earlier handsets. I don't know what the plan's called - have a look around on mobileshop for more details.

  69. Riiight... an "accident" by dep01 · · Score: 1

    Something tells me plans leaking out about these incredible new phones would do nothing but good things for Samsung. These just happened to leak out? But the slides are so well designed.... Almost as if they were to be "customer facing" *raised eyebrow*

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  70. They're coming back by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    At least here in australia. The market here seems to be splitting between "high fashion" and budget markets.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  71. Robustness by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I treat my phone like crap. If i cant find it in a pile of clothes i'll just pull it out by the charger. I'll throw it across the room if it's a call for someone else....

    i'd never dream of doing that with an ipod.

    1. Re:Robustness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I treat my phone like crap.

      You squeeze it out of your ass and flush it down the toilet?

      Yeuch. You're sick.

  72. Phones don't bounce! by 2A · · Score: 1

    So you used to be able to beat your phone and now you can't. Go back in time and it used to be okay to beat your wife and kids! Is that really what you want?

    If you can't look after your phone, you don't deserve one!

    People we need to join forces so we can collectively stop ALL FORMS of phone abuse.

    1. Re:Phones don't bounce! by argent · · Score: 1

      If you can't look after your phone, you don't deserve one!

      It's a tool, not a pet or a family member.

      HP used to advertise their calculators at trade shows by throwing them at the wall and demonstrating they still worked. They published articles about HP calculators that could go through a snowplow. HP sold that division. Now they sell iPaqs that need a $80 shock-cushioned case wrapped around them in case you drop them from your belt.

      Marantz ran an ad, once, that showed a burned out hulk of an amplifier that had fallen four stories in an apartment fire and sat in mud and ashes for a week and still worked. I don't dare jostle my stereo system these days, something might get knocked loose.

      It's about time people started making equipment like that again.

    2. Re:Phones don't bounce! by 2A · · Score: 1

      It's a tool, not a pet or a family member

      Don't say that! My lil' mobi likes going for walkies and having shnuggums in bleugh bleugh... yeah things don't seem to be made as solid anymore, but I think they're still out there... they're just harder to find because the cheap plastic bulk-made products are so... um... cheap and in bulk! Most people would rather be more careful with something than pay an extra tenner on it, especially if they'll not planning on having it long anyway.

      My phone has a crack on the plastic cover, which I could change for a not much money, should I be bothered. The crack's still there... so i guess I'm just not that bothered. I'm just more careful with where I put it.

    3. Re:Phones don't bounce! by alc6379 · · Score: 1
      My comment was simply made to emphasize how delicate these new phones are on the market compared to older phones. The story is true, and the point is true-- the new cellphones, for all their features, are more easily broken.

      Cellphones aren't designed to be run over by trucks, or be left out in the snow, but my good-old Nokia survived it. I'm not saying phones need to be built specifically to withstand that, but I would like it if the only side effect of nudging my phone off the table was saying "OOPS!", and then sitting it back on the table. I've seen other phones with slide-out faces and cheap hinges simply fall apart, or crack a hinge in such a manner that you'd have to replace the unit as a "fix".

      Even my wife's new cheap Nokia (which actually uses an updated firmware from my old phone) is made of thinner plastic than mine was, and it's just supposed to be a meat-and-potatoes phone, without all of the camera/PDA/vegetable steamer garbage. It's not a matter of looking after my phone, I feel, it's more a matter of not having to wear kid gloves when I'm using/carrying it. I don't like the fact that a piece of equipment can't stand a decent bit of jarring when it's intended to be portable enough to carry in your pocket.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
  73. that's the same as the sx66 by smc13 · · Score: 1

    That B-Bop is the same phone as the siemens sx66.

    http://www.engadget.com/entry/6548012790166434/

  74. Simplicity - Bluetooth by argent · · Score: 1

    I don't even want the bluetooth. I don't want a color screen. I don't wan an organiser. I want a cellphone that's well, just the best possible phone, that's all.

    [rant continued in #11257921]

  75. RE: battery life by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    The "convergence" is great, but battery life is definitely a prime consideration (or should be!).

    I think many folks just assume the battery life is "good enough" when they're wowed by all the flashy new features in the latest phones, and only discover how miserable it can be after the fact.

    I've got a Kyocera 7135 "Smartphone" myself, and owned the older black and white Kyocera "Smartphone" before it. The old one was a "brick" to carry around, compared to most phones, but I will say one thing; they got some excellent battery life out of it. The 7135 is dismal by comparison. I'm finding that I can *usually* get through a typical work day with it, as long as I don't use any of the PDA features or the built-in MP3 player or anything else. But if I do, the battery just can't do both that stuff AND let me make and take the calls I need to make/take throughout the whole day. It's dead by 5PM.

    I've got spare batteries and the cradle that's supposed to keep a spare charged up for you, and that helps somewhat - but not when you're in the car, miles from the office or home, and the phone conked out on you.... Worse yet, I have a car charger, but my 12V cigarette lighter plug in my car died recently - so can't even go that route right now. Frustrating!

  76. Quit bitching! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with all these people bitching about these phones? You want a phone that doesn't take pictures, play music, or make you breakfast in bread? You want a phone that's inexpensive and a plan that's only 25$ a month? Every provider I've ever seen has a basic plan in the 20$ - 25$ range, and phones with no features that are free after rebates. Instant rebates, no less; you never pay anything for them, the price is deducted -before- you pay.

    For the people bitching about the 500 MHz CPU: Windows Mobile runs just fine on a 200 MHz CPU, my assupmtion is that the faster CPU is so it can keep the MP3 function running while pausing a song to take a call, start the web browser, recieve pictures, or whatever.

    For the people bitching about color screens and not being able to use their phone to look stuff up during calls and that kind of: I have no problem moving the phone away from my ear, looking stuff up, and telling it to my girlfriend when she again forgets somebody's number. It's easy to see, and she and I can hear each other just fine.

    For those bitching about MP3 playback: I don't care about the decoder and DSP quality in a phone, the headphones I've got suck anyway. Ditto for damn near everyone else in the world. I'm not at home with a 300$ sound card and 600$ speakers, I'm on the go with 40$ set of cans.

    I can't see why anyone would bitch about a 3 GB HDD, but in response to those that would: Assuming Samsung does the right thing and makes the phone a USB mass storage device, I've suddenly got a really handy portable HDD. Hell, maybe I can even boot from it.

    To those that bitch about call quality: I've got a Samsung phone already, and people I call can't tell I'm on a mobile. The sound quality of my phone is better than my land lines; not louder, more clarity.

    TO people complaining about durability: My window is on the 3rd floor. I have dropped the phone out of it before, it still works just fine. A few nicks and scratches, but it's OK.

    And a very special note to people that complain about mobile phones in general: My phone is set to vibrate first, and then ring if I don't pick it up. My ringtone is a very generic little beep sound, and it's set kinda quiet too. If I don't want people calling me, I turn it off. I don't like bothering people, so I turn it off before going to a theater, out for dinner, or anywhere else where people would get bothered. I don't shout when I'm on a phone either; I really don't like calling attention to myself. Maybe it's not that phones are a problem, just that some people are inherently assholes.

    Wow, after writing all that, I realize why you guys bitch so much. I feel a lot better now.

  77. Well, if they're as resilient as mine... by trib · · Score: 1

    ... they'll be worth every cent!
    I washed my Samsung celphone in the washing machine just last weekend. It still works... Check my post at stephencollins.org.

  78. Windows eh? by yankeessuck · · Score: 1

    New Verizon slogan: Can you crash me now?

  79. You've got... by catdevnull · · Score: 1

    [ in my best AOL announcer voice...]
    You've got...cease and desist orders!

    By the time I saw the site, it looks like Samsung's lawyers can smell leaks as well as Apple lawyers! That's about as kean as a great white shark can smell seal blood--only they attourneys are not as kind.

    Note to self: Don't publish any internal documents from large corporations on web site.

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  80. they are CONCEPTS...and NOT by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

    ..necessarily "future plans". it says so in the pictures.

    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  81. Samsung Powerpoints by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumbshit sales people and their leftover powerpoints.

  82. Luddites by rbeattie · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Luddites all of you. You and every moron who modded you up and every frigin' commenter who responded in agreement (which seems to be all of them). Amazing.

    Is this not Slashdot? News for Nerds? WTF is this attitude towards new technology? WAKE UP. The mobile phone is in use by 1.5 BILLION people world wide. By the end of the decade that number will have almost doubled and more people on Earth will be using it as their primary computing and communication tool than any other device.

    The mobile phone is a PLATFORM now. Get it?

    Long gone are the days when it was used for just making phone calls, just like long gone are the days when Linux was used just for servers. Do you bitch every time someone launches a new CPU or adds new stuff to computer OSes just because you don't need anything except VI? "What's with all this multi-threading, multimedia and GUI support? I don't need any of that crap!"

    Get used to the fact that mobile phones are now the most important piece of technology in the world. More important than your PC or your television or your iPod.

    Bitching about how you want a simple mobile phone with cheap service is like bitching about only wanting a Pentium 3 and basic AOL dial up because all you use your computer for is email and the web. The rest of us who are trying to focus on the future are sick of hearing from you backwards motherfuckers.

    -Russ

    --
    Me
  83. Re:wowser! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> Do these companies have ANY network security in place?

    Perhaps the problem has something to do with this?

  84. Re:Your damn sig!!! by Dwonis · · Score: 1
    Firefox will allow popups that occur right after you click something. The pop-up craziness didn't happen until I clicked in the web page. Either that, or Firefox doesn't block the Flash plugin's attempts to open new windows.

    We still have a long way to go before we have *real* web security.