Slashdot Mirror


Mobile Users Plug-in Anywhere They Can

jasonla writes "The New York Times looks at mobile technology users who leech power from restaurant and airport outlets while on the road. The article looks at the habits and 'culture' of people who use portable devices -- such as laptops, iPods and cellphones -- and what the businesses think of power hungry customers." As interesting as the phenomena of customers leeching power from the businesses they frequent is the self-imposed etiquette of many users.

556 comments

  1. what about the other leachers? by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    people who use a businesses' air, light and even gravity?

    1. Re:what about the other leachers? by klang · · Score: 2, Funny

      In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

    2. Re:what about the other leachers? by welshwaterloo · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm not sure even SCO think they own the gravity local to their offices...

    3. Re:what about the other leachers? by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You've been modded offtopic, but I'll support you in this, at least up to a point.

      The fact is that restaurants arn't really in the food industry, they are in the entertainment and hospitality industry. Food just happens to be a major part of their entertainment and hospitality offerings, but not even necessarily the biggest part.

      Being treated well by the staff is very important and part of the atmosphere and ammenities that people go to a restaurant for (otherwise they could just go buy a bunch of bananas and chunck of cheese from a local mart, for a fraction the price).

      Electricty, in the form of lighting, TV sets, radios, video games and other necessaries are part of parcel of the ammenities they offer that people go there for. Now those ammenities include a place to plug in your laptop. It isn't "leeching," it's what they are there for, and paying for.

      Dear restaurant industry. Your custormer's needs are changing. Give them what they want. Tack a stupid quarter onto the bill if it makes you feel better.

      Those of you that fucking cope will turn out to be the winners.

      KFG

    4. Re:what about the other leachers? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's so far from a legitimate comparison it's not even funny. Businesses pay for electricity, to use it would be increasing their costs.

      It's not different than your neighbor hooking up his christmas lights to an external power plug on the outside of your house. It's stealing.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    5. Re:what about the other leachers? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Few of the businesses seem to care about leeching he electricity. Presumably they feel the same way.

    6. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The fact is that restaurants arn't really in the food industry, they are in the entertainment and hospitality industry. Food just happens to be a major part of their entertainment and hospitality offerings, but not even necessarily the biggest part."

      So what does that make Mc Choke 'n Puke then?

    7. Re:what about the other leachers? by wernercd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hooking lights up to your neighbors? You need new neighbors if they charge you for coming over then.

      That analogy is baloney. If I got down to starbucks and want to use my computer while drinking their coffee or hot coco, how is it stealing when I pay to use their premises? If it costs more for them to operate because of this, then they should raise their prices.

      Two companies: Company A lets me use their outlets, Company B don't. Company A gets my buisness and my money. It's not like pirating a game and the company don't get paid.

      stealing... pffft... Not when I'm buying stuff from there. If they don't want my buisness then they can remove/cover the outlets and I'll speak with my money.

    8. Re:what about the other leachers? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      So what does that make Mc Choke 'n Puke then?

      A drive-by window. When you see their window, just keep driving by.

      KFG

    9. Re:what about the other leachers? by dumrats · · Score: 2, Insightful

      KFG makes a great point, if i want food I go to a take away sandwich shop or a supermarket that sells me food and I go away. If I go to a restaurant I want them to look after me for the time I'm there and eating, the fact that maybe 10 years ago all I wanted was a seat and now I want some power - is only a change, and change happens.

      Greg

      p.s. thanks KFG for making me post a comment to /. for the first time in a long while, great comment.

    10. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mmmm... Now there's a combination I never thought of before -- please share your recipes that combine bannanas and cheese into something delicious and nutricious. I may never eat out again!

    11. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not in the drill business, we are in the hole business. Reminds me of the crap Jeff Dachis used to spout at razorfish.

    12. Re:what about the other leachers? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Buying something from a company doesn't entitle you to use every single resource they have while you're there. It only entitles you to consume your product while you're there. However, they may OPT to give you the PRIVILEGE to use other resources, such as power hookups.

      Starbucks is in the business of providing gourmet coffee bean derivatives in a seemingly up-scale environment. The fact that people decide to bring their laptops, jack in, and suck power, wasn't their choice. However, they've chosen to embrace it because that's their market, caffeine addicted self-proclaimed "writers", geeks, etc. You know, "those people."

      So, that being said, the rule now is the same rule from 100 years ago - If you didn't pay for something or don't have the express permission to use/take it, your are most likely stealing it.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    13. Re:what about the other leachers? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      well, you've already been modded to +5, so I'll just chip in to say you've hit the nail right on the head - anywhere you sit in for any length of time is providing a service beyond just food.. already a lot of them provide wi-fi and stuff (from what i hear, anyways.. we don't have fancy stuff like that where I live) so this is just an extension to that

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    14. Re:what about the other leachers? by lowe0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As has been previously mentioned, electricity is an amenity offered by the facility. It's an incentive to use their coffee shop, as opposed to one who doesn't allow use of the electricity.

      Sure, businesses who don't want to provide electricity are going to have to cover up the outlets they don't want customers using, but that's just part of the cost of doing business.

      Let me put it this way: if having $0.12 worth of electricity available for my use gets me to hang out and drink a $4.39 cup of coffee, who's losing money here?

    15. Re:what about the other leachers? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One thing I always do in cafes is ask if I can plug in my laptop to do some work or whatever. If they say that I can't (never happened yet), I won't be offended, won't try and covertly plug it in. I'll just never use that cafe for working in again. I don't know how much electricity for a laptop costs, but I drink a ton of coffee in an afternoon.

    16. Re:what about the other leachers? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact of the matter is that if you'd ever done any fine woodworking (I build furniture, boats and musical instruments) you never look at the drill, but you pay very, very careful attention to the hole.

      No woodworker gives a shit about drills, a drill is only the instrument to achieve the end goal, the perfect hole for the job, and the "drill business" is, in fact, the hole business.

      Restaurants aren't in the feeding people business, they're in the making people feel good business. Farmers and grocery stores are in the feeding people business.

      When I want food, I go to the supermarket. When I want a warm, dry, comfortable place to sit and get waited on like I was a noble, then I go to a restaurant, and if I don't get that, I never, ever go back there again. Neither does my money.

      The main reason restaurants and bars have the highest rate of failure of any business is because their owners usually don't understand this.

      KFG

    17. Re:what about the other leachers? by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      First, eat the banana, thus disarming him.

      Second eat the cheese.

      Sometimes foodstuffs are just foodstuffs you know. You don't need a recipe, just stuff it in your mouth and chew for goodness' sake.

      Oh, yeah, sooner or later you might want to try swallowing ( or at least that's what I tried to tell her).

      KFG

    18. Re:what about the other leachers? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      Exactly, but on the other hand there are airports. When you buy a plane ticket you're paying an airline, not an airport. So you as a traveller are never reimbursing the airport for your usage of their power. So it is not unreasonable for an airline to cover up its power sockets to prevent you from using electricity that they would inevitably pay for.

      However, it should not be considered impossible for the airline to go to the airport and say "Hey, our customers would benefit from this service, so how about working with us to provide." But given the cut-throat economics of airlines, I wouldn't foresee that happening.

      But realize, just because you're using $.12 of electricity in return for a $4.39 cup of java doesn't make it "ok". Only the fact that Starbucks permits it makes it ok. The new trend in thinking seems to be that if a company makes ANY profit then its customers are entitled to do whatever they damn well please until that company's profits stops. Somehow being a profitable company became a negative thing to most politically left thinking people (or those who think they're politically left thinking), probably somewhere around the same time that entitlement politics became mainstream.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    19. Re:what about the other leachers? by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not left-leaning - I'm fairly moderate.

      As for thinking I'm entitled - what happens if Starbucks covers up their outlets? I'll go somewhere else that doesn't. It's an amenity, like any other, and businesses can choose to differentiate themselves by providing it or deny it to customers in an attempt to save a couple cents. I'm willing to bet that they make more money off the people that come in to juice up than they're losing in utility costs.

      Oh, and I'm pretty sure there's a charge on airline tickets paid to airports. So, it's not like they're getting screwed here. Besides, offering amenities to business travelers brings more business into a city, bringing more tax money, which supports the government paying for the airport.

      In conclusion, you claim it's stealing, but in reality, they want you there, they want you generating revenue, and if letting you use a few cents worth of electricity helps that along, they'd be stupid not to recognize and encourage this. Taking care of the people responsible for your income is just smart business.

    20. Re:what about the other leachers? by xenicson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You do realize that there are fees associated with taking a flight to and from an airport right? Same as Starbucks, if the airport is losing money because of their travelers charging laptops, they'll either cover them up or raise landing fees.

    21. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But airports have outlets in the men's room for shavers, etc. They have free wifi in some airports. And the airports do get big truckfuls of money because there are landing fees and per passenger fees.

      In fact landing fees are a form of extortion used against first world countries by third world countries, I think middle east and African countries charge thousands of dollars for a cargo plane to land and then even more in taxiway "parking" fees.

    22. Re:what about the other leachers? by fitten · · Score: 1

      Starbucks offers power/wifi as an incentive to attact customers. You *are* paying to use these things.

      Other places do not offer these incentives. You are the customer, spend your money where you want. If you want the power/wifi, go somewhere (Starbucks) that has those for you.

      If I paid you $10 to cut my grass, does that entitle me to come over to your house and use your power/wifi and eat food from your fridge by default (after all, you didn't *tell* me that paying you to cut my grass didn't entitle me to helping myself at your place). According to your logic, if I give you money for anything (regardless of the amount of money or what it was payment for), I'm entitled to anything of yours I want.

    23. Re:what about the other leachers? by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 4, Insightful

      dig it brother:

      I spent 20 years doing everything in resteraunts from cleaning toilets to managing.

      Now I was never fond of customers who would sit there smoking for 4hrs after their meal. But I'd kill to keep those bar flies stuck to their stools for another 2 beers.

      When the vote came up to ban smoking in public places in Florida, every resteraunt owner (not the bars)was tripping over him/herself to pass it (one resteraunt couldn't do it, cause smokers would leave, but if they all did it at the same time.. It's not just cause we were tired if scrubbing tar off the ceilngs, or it stinking the place up. It was that smokers hands and mouths are bussy as they smoke. There for there is nothing for them to buy. And they are still sucking up space, air, and waitresses.

      Now some guy on a laptop is a different matter all together. They take frequent breaks, and are continuously buying coffee, and snacks.

      In one case we had a russian buisness man (I kid you not) called Borris. He made us his office. From 10am till 7pm he was there every day. Yelling and cursing on his cellphone, playing his game boy, and pounding at his note book. He must have been into us for $75 a day. We made the food and coffee to order for him. We named a sandwich after him. We added an espresso machine for him. (ok so other customers drank the espresso too). Borris is not that unusuall, especialy with the Starbucks example. And what ever it took to make him happy we did, because we never would spend more than he did.

      Electricity is cheap. And 10 laptops will cost me less than running 1 big screen TV.

      It's not stealing, if your a patron. If you come in, clog the toilet, juice your laptop, and don't leave a single cent behind, then your a leach. But your in the minority, by far. It's worth it.

    24. Re:what about the other leachers? by Thuktun · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Dear restaurant industry. Your custormer's needs are changing. Give them what they want. Tack a stupid quarter onto the bill if it makes you feel better.

      This is true of more than the restaurant industry. More and more consumer-facing industries are turning on their own customers because the customers are behaving different from what they like or expect.

      Some examples that jump out at me:
      • RIAA and MPAA suing small-time copyright infringers instead of changing their business models to cater to digerati.
      • Best Buy leading the way in its sector by trying to exclude the 20% of its customers that they find troublesome.
      I'm sure there are some I'm forgetting, but I'm just now consuming my morning caffeine.
    25. Re:what about the other leachers? by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      I have the same opinion about WiFi. I don't go places that don't have free WiFi. All the Starbucks in my area use T-Mobile. When I found this out, I told the manager that I wasn't going to stay in a coffee shop that didn't have free WiFi, and that once the novelty of the Starbucks ran out (we've just gotten them in the past couple years), a lot of other people won't either. He shrugged, and I went a few miles down the road to a local coffee shop that has free WiFi, nicer employees, and shorter lines. But mostly it's the free WiFi.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    26. Re:what about the other leachers? by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      people who use a businesses' air, light and even gravity?

      Don't most customers bring their own gravity? Perhaps you just happen to frequent businesses where most of the customers are massless.

    27. Re:what about the other leachers? by tftp · · Score: 1

      Might have something to do with a fact that one electrical grill consumes more power than 20 customers. Businesses don't want to be penny-wise and pound-foolish. This problem exists only in minds of /. editors :-)

    28. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      businesses who don't want to provide electricity are going to have to cover up the outlets they don't want customers using

      and women who don't want to be raped have to dress in non-revealing clothes.

    29. Re:what about the other leachers? by countach44 · · Score: 0

      They don't have to pay for air, light (not sunlight at least), or gravity...

    30. Re:what about the other leachers? by kfg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More and more consumer-facing industries are turning on their own customers because the customers are behaving different from what they like or expect.

      You can largely blame this on the proliferation of business schools. Business school "trained" people will call a customer a "consumer" right to his face, which, not only ought to be unthinkable, but abuses the theoretical model for which the term is legitimately appropriate.

      You see it in the use of the word "product" too, even for things that aren't even really products.

      The theoretical business language, and the mental distance from the customer, who is a real individual person standing in front of you, that this creates is causing all sorts of social ills.

      Even the "consumers" are using the language themselves now.

      "Thank you for the guitar lesson. I really like your product."

      "The ship in a bottle you made me was far more than I expected. I really like your product."

      What on earth causes them to refer to my ships in bottles as "product?" It's a ship. In a bottle. And you already said that.

      At least that really is a product in the theoretical model though. The guitar lesson thing has me really stumped.

      I'm sure there are some I'm forgetting, but I'm just now consuming my morning caffeine.

      Lot of that going around right now. Just check out my spelling and grammar so far this morning.

      KFG

    31. Re:what about the other leachers? by danila · · Score: 0, Troll

      This is bullshit. I don't ask explicit permission to use napkins, sugar or salt, I don't ask explicit permission to use toilet paper. It's just that salt and toilet paper was used for decades and everyone expects the restaurant patrons to use them. Electrical outlets were not used before as we didn't have the portables, but fortunately the outlets themselves were available.

      Almost everyone realises that your customers should be allowed to use the outlets (except that one bitch waitress). Almost every customer realises that (even though it wasn't common 10 years ago) now you have the implicit right to get electricity from the restaurant. It's still not as obvious and rarely do establishments provide the outlets specifically for the clients, but overall it's pretty safe to say that there is already a consensus - you have the right to use electrical power in a restaurant (or anywhere else). Just like filling a bottle with water in the bathroom (when you need it for a long car trip or something).

      It's called common sense and basic decency. Humans are able to live together without signing a contract everytime they need to pass gas or charge a cellphone.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    32. Re:what about the other leachers? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      Right, it's an amenity that they provide you. And "amenity" is the key word. They do it because it's smart business to make you want to come back. It's long-term thinking which isn't done nearly enough.

      But that doesn't make you entitled to it, and that's my single point. I'm not trying to imply America is doomed because people recharge their laptops at Starbucks, just that people should not think they're entitled to. Emphasis everywhere I mention *entitled* because that is the word I want people to focus on. Using a power socket at Starbucks is not a right given by any religious being or political power, it's a privilege afforded to the customer by the store. Using said privilege makes no one evil or in anyway a lesser person and I have no grudge with them for simply using it, only if they think they're entitled to it.

      Problem is, once people are given something, they think they're entitled to it.

      reiteration:

      You're right to say in the case of Starbucks or airports it'd be stupid to not let you use the power hookup, but nothing about that means your entitled to it.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    33. Re:what about the other leachers? by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      How is that extortion? No one says they *have* to land at that airport. They could fly somewhere else.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    34. Re:what about the other leachers? by mig0 · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight, I can go to the Starbucks to use my laptop there and drink coffee, but if my laptop battery dies (or cell phone or PDA or etc.) I'm SOL?

      The fact that they're attracting people with laptops to their shops with this Wifi suggests that they need to offer electricity as well so people can recharge batteries.

      Next thing you'll say I'm stealing their water and soap and toilet paper for using their bathrooms.

    35. Re:what about the other leachers? by dajak · · Score: 1

      They don't have to pay for air, light (not sunlight at least), or gravity...

      They don't own it. It is immaterial whether the patron paid for something, inherited it, made it, or received it as a gift. The patron pays for artificial light, but he doesn't own it.

    36. Re:what about the other leachers? by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      That's so far from a legitimate comparison it's not even funny. Businesses pay for electricity, to use it would be increasing their costs.

      They could reduce this cost, along with the costs incurred by the restrooms, heating, and air conditioning by simply keeping the customers out.

      Seriously, though, if a restaurant considers it stealing, there are options open to them. Remove or lock the power outlets from the dining room or lobby. Or post a sign stating that it's not allowed and enforce it. If they don't, it's just another aspect of the restaurant that the customer is using while they're paying for products and services.

    37. Re:what about the other leachers? by danila · · Score: 1

      If I am coming to a night club, and pay them perfectly good money for drinks, while watching striptease or a table dancer, it's the responsibility of the establishment (including the girls themselves and the security) to make it clear to me that free sex is not included.

      It's not like we are talking about people just breaking into private apartments and charging their laptops there.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    38. Re:what about the other leachers? by danila · · Score: 1

      This depends on the culture. In some countries it would be expected that when coming to a house to clean the pool, mown the lawn, etc., you are entitled to using the bathroom for free. In other countries it would be expected that the person can drink some soda from the fridge if he's thirsty. It depends on what are the social norms.

      In the United States it just so happens that the majority of people using portable devices think it's ok to use power outlets and the majority of various establishments think that it's ok. Everyone who disagrees and thinks it's stealing should STFU because they are a minority. If you don't want me to use your electricity, cover the outlets or put a sign. If you don't and then start complaining, I will kick you in the nuts for being an annoying moron.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    39. Re:what about the other leachers? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      No doubt. Although the actual comparison is probably with the estimated value of enticing a customer into a restaurant. A single transaction will probably make more profit than the cost of power, even after other overheads are taken into account.

    40. Re:what about the other leachers? by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

      Well I guess that is your skewed perspective, as a Floridian I would eat out every night, as I enjoyed it.

      The meal and tip were always around $30 at a minimum for my meal, cheaper in the middle of the night at Denny's, way more at a nice place.

      The smoking ban went through, I took this as the restaurants as well as the general population in Florida no longer need my money.

      So in the end you got what you wanted, you eliminated a customer who would always tip, bring a bunch of friends and dump a load of cash in your establishment for almost zero work.

      So your observation about if they all did it smokers would have no choice....incorrect my friend, there are plenty of non-restaurants who make food to go. I go there, I invite everyone to my place and we eat and smoke and have a good time. I didn't go to your restaurant for food, it's that last place I'd go, most restaurants in Florida suck compared to any decent sized metro area around the country.

    41. Re:what about the other leachers? by homer_ca · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Starbucks is in the business of providing gourmet coffee bean derivatives in a seemingly up-scale environment"

      Actually Starbucks follows the tradition of European cafes where you can buy a fancy coffee drink and sit as long as you want to read, socialize or whatever, like a non-alcoholic bar. American restaurants follow more the food service model, and they're more likely to hurry you out after you've finished eating (or at a bar clear away your empties and ask if you want more drinks). One European commented that the waitresses in bars are nice and attentive because they keep coming back to ask if we're OK. I had to explain "Are you OK?" really means "Do you need more drinks?". :-)

    42. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are still sucking up space, air, and waitresses

      Man, the last time I tried sucking on a waitress, I got kicked out!

    43. Re:what about the other leachers? by castanaveras · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that - I used to be a regular at a Barnes & Noble near my old house, went in several times a week to work on projects in their cafe on my laptop. I'd stay 4 or 5 hours and spend 10-12 bucks on the overpriced food. That is, until the day I came in and discovered that they'd replaced all the faceplates for the electrical outlets in the cafe area with blank metal plates to prevent laptop users from plugging in.

      Now I go to Borders, and recently I went in after work and found that that day (I'd been there the previous night) they'd had new electrical outlets installed next to every table that was against a wall.

      I'm a book junkie, and between books and food/drink, I easily spend a hundred or so dollars a month - I go through three or four of their buy ten get one free drink cards every month.

      And as an added bonus, the computer book selection is a lot better.

    44. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What on earth causes them to refer to my ships in bottles as "product?" It's a ship. In a bottle. And you already said that.

      While the use of "product" for a lesson is a bit curious, I don't see that it's inappropriate for the ship in a bottle: you produced it, it's a product of your efforts. What would you suggest in its place? "Artifact"? "Knicknack"? The ever popular "thingy"?

    45. Re:what about the other leachers? by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      That's so far from a legitimate comparison it's not even funny. Businesses pay for electricity, to use it would be increasing their costs.
      Next thing you know, they're going to be wanting free toilet paper in the bathrooms. They're all communists, like Bill sez.
      It's not different than your neighbor hooking up his christmas lights to an external power plug on the outside of your house. It's stealing.
      It's different because I'm not paying my neighbor. I am paying the restaurant. If they don't want me doing it, they can say so, and then I can take my business elsewhere if I don't like it.
    46. Re:what about the other leachers? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That's so far from a legitimate comparison it's not even funny. Businesses pay for electricity, to use it would be increasing their costs.

      They also pay for tap water, but they give it to me for free, so the point is valid.

      It's not different than your neighbor hooking up his christmas lights to an external power plug on the outside of your house. It's stealing.

      And leaving the water running too long in the bathroom is stealing too? How about if you flush the toilet/urinal next to you because the person before you didn't? How about if you take an extra paper towel to open the bathroom door without having to touch the handle? After all, you are taking a towel for something other than drying your hands. It's all theft to use any of their free services, right?

    47. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and you pay fees to the airport as part of the ticket purchase.

      But seriously, how hard is it to ask an employee at your airport, restaurant or whatever "Is it OK if I plug in my laptop / cellphone / camera for a while"? I have charged digital cameras in restaurants, laptops in airports and restaurants, and the airport and restaurant people have been happy to oblige. It's becoming more common for planes and trains to offer power for laptops etc.

      But no, it's not a "right". Buying a coffee in your cafe doesn't give me a "right" to use your power outlet any more than it gives me the right to eat your dinner, sleep with your wife, or take home the silverware.

      If the airport won't let you use power, try going into an airport bar or cafe, telling them you'd like to sit and work and use their power, and keep buying the drinks. If they have a socket available, I'm sure they'll spare a little power to keep you sitting in their premises spending money.

    48. Re:what about the other leachers? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I don't ask permission to use their bathroom. I'm not going to ask permission to use their electrical outlet.

      If they ask me to leave, I will. I will also never bring them any money.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    49. Re:what about the other leachers? by baudbarf · · Score: 1

      Good point, superfluous expletive.

      --
      You can run but you can't hide, except, apparently, along the Afghan-Pakistani border.
    50. Re:what about the other leachers? by Brett+Johnson · · Score: 1

      And those that leach water when they use the toilet?

    51. Re:what about the other leachers? by kfg · · Score: 1

      What would you suggest in its place?

      How about "It."

      Here's how it goes in natural language:

      "The ship in a bottle you made me was far more than I expected. I really like it."

      (I'm not sure why he's pleased about being a ship in a bottle, but we'll let that pass)

      The object, the ship in a bottle, has already been refered to in explict terms. Only the simple pronoun is required after that. Refering to it later on in statistical terms (remember that "product" is a statistical term, and thus essentially plural, just like "consumer." They both refer to sets, not items, and are only singular in the sense of refering to the set as a whole) is lingistically, and conceptually, a bit weird. People are used to hearing that sort of language formation these days so the brain doesn't register it as weird, but it is.

      Here's an example from a different perspective. You wouldn't say, "Your mom is nice. I really like your people." It would be, "I really like her."

      "Your family is nice. I really like your people," is fine, because there you are speaking of a set.

      And really, both the terms "consumer" and "product" have no reason to exist at all outside of the economic calculus. They are technical terms for mathmatically discussing the behavior of groups. They cannot even be correctly applied to unique items ( as all of my ships in bottles are. I've never made the same one twice and each has a different price). The economic calculus only applies to generic items, commodities. Unique items are inherently handled in a strict one to one, buyer/seller relationship.

      I admit I'm very fond of the technical term "thingy" though. I used it just last night when I was strumming some warm up chords and someone asked, "Are you going to play that song?"

      "What, the Tom Waits thingy? Sure"

      KFG

    52. Re:what about the other leachers? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Interestingly (perhaps), here (Kuala Lumpur) it's the other way around - Starbucks offers free wifi, while the other chains are affiliated with pay-for-service wifi vendors.

      The Starbuckses are definitely mobbed with laptop users, so if that was the demographic they were after, they've got it.

      Given the cost and crappiness of T-Mobile's service, I don't understand why it is that so many Starbücks in the US are full of laptoppers. I would have thought they'd all be at The Community Beanery down the street where the wifi is free. Maybe it's the cigarette smoke.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    53. Re:what about the other leachers? by antarctican · · Score: 1

      While travelling in China this summer I saw an interesting solution to this problem. One store I visited in Nanjing there was a unit in the corner with about a dozen different cellphone adaptors hanging from it.

      One could bring their dead cell phone in, plug into the appropriate adaptor and change their phone, for a fee....

      I wish I had taken more time to examine the unit to see how exactly it worked, as in how much is cost per... minute? (I was in a hurry to purchase some plane and train tickets) The thing is, cell phones aren't exactly quick chargers, so I don't see how this made much sense.

      However I think this was also a matter of paying for the convinience of having the proper power adaptor there, since we all know there are so many possible plug types when it comes to electronic gadgets.

      Anyhow, if anyone has more information on these units, please do post!

    54. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about those of us with deadly allergic reactions to your vice?

    55. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      most restaurants in Florida suck compared to any decent sized metro area around the country.
      Um. Hi. You just compared the entire STATE of Florida with other 'metro areas'. Do you have any idea how useless that statement is?

      For example, I know half a dozen GREAT restaraunts in the Orlando area alone. I know two GREAT restaraunts in the Gainesville area. I know two GREAT restaraunts in the Tampa area. And that's just the 'decent sized metro areas' I visit frequently. Florida has four major cities (Orlando, Miami, Tampa, Jacksonville), and a bunch of smaller cities. And, having lived in many other places in the country, I can difinitively tell you that Florida is not out of the ordinary in any way with restaraunts, except Orlando. Orlando has plenty of expensive tourist digs which are relatively quite expensive because I-Drive land is damn expensive.

      "most restaurants in Florida suck", you say? I'm sorry, you've not visited the right ones. Shut the fuck up and stop complaining.
    56. Re:what about the other leachers? by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny
      What would you suggest in its place? "Artifact"? "Knicknack"? The ever popular "thingy"?

      How about the standard business school term, "widget"?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    57. Re:what about the other leachers? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Exactly, but on the other hand there are airports. When you buy a plane ticket you're paying an airline, not an airport. So you as a traveller are never reimbursing the airport for your usage of their power.

      Have you ever actually seen a plane ticket? Check the bits of the fare calculation section that start with 'X'. Of course you pay for the airport, and often it's a lot. At some European airports you may pay close to $100 for the privilege of walking down their corridors and plugging shit into their juicy 230-volt outlets.

      How do you think airports are funded, by charitable donations? They get landing fees from the airline, passenger fees from you, and rent from the vendors who want you sitting at their tables drinking their coffee - even if they have to spend an extra cent on power to seal the deal.

      But realize, just because you're using $.12 of electricity in return for a $4.39 cup of java doesn't make it "ok". Only the fact that Starbucks permits it makes it ok.

      No, the fact that it's reasonable behavior (remember common sense? Or was that before your time?) makes it okay. Just like going into the bathroom and washing a stain out of your shirt using their *gasp* water, or holding the door open a few seconds longer to help someone with crutches enter, even though that wastes the store's *gasp* heat.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    58. Re:what about the other leachers? by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      The sole purpose of a power outlet is to provide power. Unless you were to claim that the sole purpose of women is to provide sex, your analogy has problems.....

      If you do claim that... well, then you have problems. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    59. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      So, that being said, the rule now is the same rule from 100 years ago - If you didn't pay for something or don't have the express permission to use/take it, your are most likely stealing it.


      I'm calling bulshit. Either that or all those kids who steal water (that costs the company $$$$!!!) from water fountains without express permission of the business should be thrown in jail for theft.

      Our society is FULL of implied permissions. Not just water fountains. Have you ever taken a mint from a bowl as you were walking out of the resturaunt even though there was no sign saying "FREE - take one"? Then, by your standard, you are a theif.

      A water fountain w/o a sign is an implied invitation to drink. A bowl of mints in a resturaunt w/o a sign is an implied invitation to take a mint. These things cost the providing companies money, but they exist.

      The question becomes: Is an uncovered electrical outlet without any sign an implied invitation to plug in. This is a confusing question. At StarBux, the answer is yes. At other places, the answer is an aggrivated NO DAMNIT. At still other places the answer is "I've never thought about it"

      As a society we are just working out this issue, and I think EVENTUALLY the answer will be that an uncovered outlet in a public place is an invitation and a covered outlet (regardles of whether the cover can be removed) is not an invitation.

      In any case, to label those who do not do what you do in an unclear social context as theives is absurd.

    60. Re:what about the other leachers? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      How is that extortion? No one says they *have* to land at that airport. They could fly somewhere else.

      Excellent point. If the landing fees at Heathrow are too expensive, there's always Baghdad. Get the passengers drunk enough and they'll never know the difference.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    61. Re:what about the other leachers? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      The problem is one of abuse. A restaurant (or more likely, a coffee shop) has a limited number of seats and tables, and from that seating capacity it needs to make enough money to survive. Now, if "normal" customers buy a $3 coffee and stay 20 minutse, while a laptop-using customer buys the same coffee and stays 2 hours, they have a problem.

      In fact, this is plainly obvious from any visiting any chain bookstore in my area. The tables are almost always taken up by people who are working or studying, some of them with books that are not even purchased. These customers are also generally oblivious to the fact that people are standing up waiting for a table. This prevents the shop from making money, because not having a place to sit down means another customer may not go in at all.

      It doesn't take many abusive customers to consume all the seating you have, nevermind the electricity they consume. Recently I'm beginning to see not-so-friendly signs that say how long you can stay per drink. How do you propose they "fucking cope" with this? Institute cover charges like some bars?

    62. Re:what about the other leachers? by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      No, people who disagree should not, as you put it, STFU. They have a right to their opinion.

      In fact, they should be vocal about their opinion. The more vocal they are about it, the easier it is for people who care to realize that those businesses don't care about their customers, thus making it easier for us to avoid their establishments.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    63. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A rather power hungry "gamer's" notebook (16", mobile 64 and GF Go) draws 120W of power from the grid. I measured this a few weeks ago with a power meter and a friend's notebook.

      It takes 3 hours while fully operating (gaming, watching DVD or equally demanding applications) to recharge that machine. 3 hours with 120W means it totally consumed 0.36 kWh. Speaking for Germany, where I know for sure electricity is insanely expensive because of extreme taxation, eco-tax 'n stuff, every kWh costs 14.5 euro-cents (0.145 eur) or at current rates 19.11 US-cents (0.1911 USD).

      So recharging the battery of this power hog that is a notebook totals 0.0522 EUR or 0.0688 USD.

      If you, as an entrepreneur, have a problem with a customer using around 7 - seven! *cents* worth of electricity while that customer stays 3 - three *hours* in your facility, while they keep buying expensive coffee and small snacks, you better leave your business immediately and apply for a job at the ILS. I'm serious, they need bean counters and hate customer relations over there.

      Two napkins and a straw at McDonalds probably cost about the same as 3h electricity for a large notebook. Better make sure your leeching customers only take one napkin per person or you'll charge them some cents.

      To make things even more absurd: take a cellphone charger. Power usage: 6W. Time to fully recharge a phone battery: 2h. Electricity used: 0.012kWh. Cost for this 0.00174 EUR or 0.0023 USD. Not even a quarter of a cent. Paying, coffee-drinking customers that bring their friends and come back someday with an already charged cellphone.

      And you say they're stealing. You're a straight-shooter right out of Harvard, eh?

      Sheesh, what's wrong with this greedy world today? At some point we had free refills and as much ketchup I liked for my hotdog and now some pple want to charge for some 6 cents of electricity. Counting napkins and charging quarter cents, great advice man, great. Where the heck did you learn mastership of customer relationship, then?

    64. Re:what about the other leachers? by rekoil · · Score: 1

      Somewhat OT, but wasn't there a company putting up WiFi APs into buildings that were adjacent to Starbucks locations (making sure the signal reached the store) and selling WiFi at half of T-Mobile's price?

    65. Re:what about the other leachers? by kfg · · Score: 1

      How do you propose they "fucking cope" with this?

      It is very simple. Ask them nicely and politely to move along to allow another customer a seat. It works 99% of time without any complaint whatsoever.

      The remaining 1% can simply have their asses tossed.

      There is something called the "social contract." It is perfectly reasonable to invoke it without having to make up a lot of silly rules.

      Of course there's always the NYC way. Have the seats ergonomically designed to suddenly become painful to sit in after 20 minutes. Such seats can be purchased off the shelf.

      I must assume that the chain bookstores that put out comfy armchairs and sofas expect people to occupy them for a considerable time if they so desire.

      KFG

    66. Re:what about the other leachers? by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      Places with free wifi really expect plugging in, and often make the outlets frequent and convinient.

    67. Re:what about the other leachers? by Suicyco · · Score: 1

      I'm entitled to it because I say I am and they have made no attempt to change that opinion, plain and simple. If they disagree with me on that, they own the premises and can shoo me away and I will not come back. Its simple common social acceptance. The majority of things in life operate this way, not under some strict trade for services bullshit you seem to believe. I am not entitled to walk in the back and start making some coffee for myself. This is implicit in the design of the place. If there is a coffee machine next to each table, then I'd say I was entitled to take coffee from it, because that would obviously be the point.

      You are arguing against the existence of any sort of non-spoken agreements between people in business relationships.

      There are many things in life you can just take for granted, not everything needs to be spelled out. Most people can figure these things out on their own and things balance out. There are those who take too much, and those who must be in a clear contract to perform any action. Most people are in between that and there is nothing your ranting against entitlement can ever do to change that.

      If I walk into a car dealership, and sit down waiting to be helped, I can surely help myself to the box of donuts sitting on the table.

      Because I feel entitled to it.

    68. Re:what about the other leachers? by bynary · · Score: 1

      Money spent on lighting and air are legitimate business expenses. Most places (at least in the U.S.) pump their air through air conditioner/filtration systems. Most places (legitimate ones, of course) pay for the electricity that powers their lighting fixtures, air conditioners, and etc. Gravity, on the other hand, is not a resource but a force of nature and cannot (yet) be generated (that I'm aware of. Anyone know of any man-made gravity field generators?.

      So, the definition the article presents for a leecher is indeed rather accurate. Plugging your laptop, cell phone, PDA, or whatever into an outlet that was not intentionally provided as a service to the customer is an unplanned increase in operating expenses for the business. It would be similar to connecting a hose to the outside of their building and using it to water your lawn. The business has to pay for the water but they got no ROI from it. Now, telling people they can no longer plug in may actually hurt them more than just not addressing the issue.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    69. Re:what about the other leachers? by crbowman · · Score: 1

      You,ve obviously never looked closely at your ticket costs. Somewhere in there is usually an airport tax, ie the airport is charging you for it use.

    70. Re:what about the other leachers? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      It is very simple. Ask them nicely and politely to move along to allow another customer a seat. It works 99% of time without any complaint whatsoever.

      It's not that simple. A lost sale may be as little as somebody walking by outside, taking a glance in, and seeing that there's no place to sit down, moving right on. It's weird to ask a customer to leave when this is all that is happening, and it's also something that service personnel don't necessarily like to do. The 1% may be rude to them, which is something nobody needs.

      I must assume that the chain bookstores that put out comfy armchairs and sofas expect people to occupy them for a considerable time if they so desire.

      I don't agree with your assumption at all. A bookstore makes its living through selling books, not letting you read the whole thing in the store. The chairs, I would assume, are there so you can sit down for a bit, not so you can take off your shoes and read through the entire novel without paying.

      You mentioned the "NYC way", and so you may need to understand that the suburban areas have a slightly different culture. People don't like to be "rude", and would rather not ask customers to leave. This in turn works well if customers rein in their own behavior. It is in this world that abusers can take over a coffee shop or a bookstore.

    71. Re:what about the other leachers? by trentblase · · Score: 1

      How exactly is that extortion (any more than supply/demand is extortion). The market certainly bears these high prices.

    72. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> they are still sucking up space, air, and waitresses

      > Man, the last time I tried sucking on a waitress, I got kicked out!

      I'm afraid that definitely *won't* be included in the cost of your coffee.

      (And, am I the only one who thought the imagery in the grandparent message was quite strange? How do you suck up a waitress? It sounds like some sort of hideous sucking-creature that goes around consuming waitresses, masquerading as a human being).

    73. Re:what about the other leachers? by kfg · · Score: 1

      The 1% may be rude to them, which is something nobody needs.

      Ok, so what's your solution to the existence of rude people then?

      The chairs, I would assume, are there so you can sit down for a bit, not so you can take off your shoes and read through the entire novel without paying.

      It might surprise you to find out that the people who read the most books without paying for them are also the people who spend the most money on books, and by a considerable margin. People who do not love books do not go hang out in bookstores for days at a time.

      People who read the most books for free at the library are also great book buyers. People who do not go to the library buy few, if any, books.

      You mentioned the "NYC way", and so you may need to understand that the suburban areas have a slightly different culture.

      I do not live in NYC. I dislike the place rather intensely, although I am, by professional and family/personal ties often obliged to go there.

      I live well upstate in an area rife with suburbia. Ed Koch publicly called it "The land of pickup trucks and gingham dresses," which likely cost him the governorship.

      It is not "rude" to ask people, politely, to be polite, and I am at a loss as to how having chairs that are only comfortable for a short time invokes personal rudeness.

      I agree that the young, minimum wage personel in a chain bookstore aren't the best people to do the job of politely maintaining order though, and I for what they make I wouldn't expect them to be.

      If you want better service and managment than that then my advice would simply be not to go to McBookstores, just as you might avoid McDonald's. They're frickin' chain stores staffed by minimum wage kids. What do you expect?

      KFG

    74. Re:what about the other leachers? by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      This is something that always got me. Most places in the United States want to get people in, shove their coffee and/or food at them, and then get them to leave as quickly as possible.

      A lot of forigen countries don't tend to have this. There, cafes and restraunts are places to go, eat, socialize, and relax. There's no rush to get in and get out.

      The one real exception I've seen to this in the US so far (asside from the odd restraunt or coffee shop that I've come across) is in New Orleans where the French influence still exists. There you go in or sit on the patio, have your coffee, food, or whatever and relax. You can stay there for hours chatting with friends or just enjoying the weather or scenery and it's the normal thing to do there.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    75. Re:what about the other leachers? by khrtt · · Score: 1

      Slice up bananas (better yet, plantain), pan-fry, and sprinkle with grated cheese. Green bananas work better, the ripe ones tend to fall apart.

    76. Re:what about the other leachers? by pod · · Score: 1

      It's part of the culture, true. It has to do with how many places to eat out per capita there are. In European cities, most streets are lined with cafes and restaurants. There's almost never a case that you will have to wait for a table. Just go down the street and find another place. In most of US, this is not the case. Even if it is, everything is spread out in large malls or even worse, stip malls. Concentrated in few locations, as opposed to spread over the city. Population density does not allow this. You can see the influence in places like New Orleans, New York, Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, even Calgary as of recent.

      I love it! Pop in, grab a drink, some food, hang our for an hour or two. No rush. No lineups. Somewhere too busy? Go two doors down, the food is probably just as good, as opposed to in the US where there are very few 'good' places, and lots of chain crap, so people tend to congregate inappropriately even more, competing for the same space.

      Also, 'lower prices than competitors' mentality means low margins, which encourage high customer turnover to keep profits up. Keep em moving. McDs even got it down to a science with the colour scheme and furniture design.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    77. Re:what about the other leachers? by pod · · Score: 1

      It's the classic tragedy of the commons. You do something nice, and most people appreciate and don't abuse, but someone always does and spoils it for everyone. Because once abusers begins to affect business, the store has to start placing signs spelling out the limits.

      Same thing happened with 'unlimited Internet'. Worked fine for vast majority of the people, but a few abusers noticed they could get away with a lot, and so they did. Eventually ISPs put caps in place, often very low, so the people who usually used reasonable amounts would be 'unfairly' punished when they went over once or twice a year.

      It's just a bad atmosphere. At first the unlimited bandwidth ISPs and comfy chair book stores were a 'secret'; a few people knew you could go there once or twice a month and relax for a bit, browse some books, drink a coffee, etc. Word got out, and the freeloaders took over. Happens all the time.

      What to do about it? Nothing you CAN do except put limits in place, or get rid of the nice freebie. Maybe you'll now have to pay a buck for 15 or 30 minutes to sit in a comfy chair. Or buy $x of merchandise. Not so friendly and personal anymore, is it?

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    78. Re:what about the other leachers? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I don't have an answer to rudeness or selfish behavior. If I did, then this discussion wouldn't have to come up at all.

      The point is, when a business provides extra service such as a nice couch or a power socket, each customer must develop an understanding of what sort of usage is fair to the provider. Because there are people who readily abuse every comfort and convenience, something will be done. Either is service is taken away for all, or some other device (think parking meter) is used to prevent abuse. I interpreted your "just fucking cope" comment to include none of these "countermeasures", which is why I suggested that abusers make it difficult or impossible to just cope.

      You must notice that the closer you are to a City, the harder it is to find a bathroom you can borrow. Same deal. We can't just ask them to cope with the increased abuse.

    79. Re:what about the other leachers? by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1
      If only all businesses were lucky enough to have so many customers stealing from them...

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    80. Re:what about the other leachers? by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1
      Blaming the business schools seems hardly productive. The business schools are people who teach common doctrine, just as science and arts schools. Do you blame the art schools if everyone seems to like a certain style of art?

      The only reason people use some of these terms is to identify exactly what it is they are doing. I own a tanning salon. I have services (expoure to UV, or use of a UV-free booth) and products (lotions, etc). I have an MBA, but I don't tell the customers (never called one a consumer) "Hi Consumer, to make our services better use our products". I listen to their needs and then offer a lotion that adds to the experience of getting a tan. In my other job, I am a tech support manager for a manufacturer. In some cases I say consumer, but it's because our "customers" can be consumers (end users, if you will), dealers, distributors or other manufacturers who OEM our products. Saying customer would be helplessly vague.

      Gettin back on topic, I agree with the change in attitude. The successful businesses pay attention to what their customers place value upon and act. You can have the latest and greatest, but if the consumer doesn't value your goods or services...you are doomed to become a commodity or go away. (There, there's you biz school speak).

    81. Re:what about the other leachers? by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1


      Loss is always weighed against gain. In America most people don't smoke now.

      I kick out one smoker, who sits next to 8 other people (sides+corners) who don't want to smell the smoke, how many customers have I gained?

      A non-smoker(who isn't a harping twit) doesn't offend anyone, or drive away customers. People never say "Oh I like that resteraunt, except for all the non-smokers, the air is just too clear there"

      Smoking and Non-Smoking sections were always a joke. As if those 3 plants you put in between really are filtering the air, and stoping the smoke.

      1 resteraunt can't ban smokers because allot of buisness comes from buisness group lunches (group night outings, etc). 1 smoker can complain, and change the plans of the entire group. You loose buisness.

      But if it is understood, defacto, that smoking is not done indoors in any resteraunt we can kick all your stinky butts out with impunity. Because reality is that resteraunts make money much more on groups, and less on single patrons (note:more than linear scale, peope in groups buy beer, deserts, appetizers). If any where you go you can't smoke, then you have no more voice on the group.

      PS: Harping anti smokers suck. Quiting is hard, I know, I did it (allot of times, the last one seems to have taken). But that doesn't meen you give up. Go get a bag of sucking candies and quit. Every day you can't breath is one day of your life you won't enjoy. The only thing all succesfull quiters have in common is that they all wanted too , for real.

    82. Re:what about the other leachers? by flossie · · Score: 1
      I had to explain "Are you OK?" really means "Do you need more drinks?". :-)

      Oh. I always thought they were just taking an inordinate interest in my well-being in the hope of getting a good tip (they do have to try *very* hard to get good tips from Brits).

    83. Re:what about the other leachers? by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with your assumption at all. A bookstore makes its living through selling books, not letting you read the whole thing in the store. The chairs, I would assume, are there so you can sit down for a bit, not so you can take off your shoes and read through the entire novel without paying.

      Actually, he was right. I worked for Barnes & Noble and the chairs were there for you to sit down, get comfy and ready. The official policy is you could stay as long as you wanted to. No, you can't take your shoes off (at least in stores with cafe's, but probably others as well). Sleeping in the store is frowned on, but if you just dozed off while reading it's ok. A manager would probably only say something if you were asleep for a long time, or slept there frequently.

      I also have a lot of experience as a customer of bookstore's of various sizes, and I've never seen one that discouraged people from just sitting and reading.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    84. Re:what about the other leachers? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      No, you can't take your shoes off (at least in stores with cafe's, but probably others as well). Sleeping in the store is frowned on, but if you just dozed off while reading it's ok. A manager would probably only say something if you were asleep for a long time, or slept there frequently.

      I was not talking about store policy, which are not generally visible to customers, but the expectation that a customer should have. The person I was responding to expected that the existence of the chair means something, I expect it to mean another. It doesn't really matter to me whose expectations match those of the store, because the store has a different set of values than either of us.

      As you mentioned, despite official policy, you really shouldn't stay "as long as you wanted to", just as free refills at the soda fountain doesn't mean you and fifty friends can just buy one cup. At some (usually low) point businesses expect people to just be decent, but beyond that they do have to take action.

      I also have a lot of experience as a customer of bookstore's of various sizes, and I've never seen one that discouraged people from just sitting and reading.

      I respect your expertise. However, consider the soda fountain. In the suburbs, you generally get to fill your own cup and get a refill if you like. This is rarely the case once you enter the city. The point is, businesses do what they have to to adapt to the environment, and can't just be expected to swallow whatever their customers "need".

    85. Re:what about the other leachers? by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      Starbucks is in the business of providing gourmet coffee bean derivatives in a seemingly up-scale environment. The fact that people decide to bring their laptops, jack in, and suck power, wasn't their choice.

      Then why offer WiFi access, and electrical outlets near customer seating?

      You know, if businesses are really having problems with this, all they need to do is not put electrical outlets in seating areas.

      I see this from time to time -- electrical outlets in unnecessary places. Sure, the person who runs the vacuum at the end of the day may need an outlet or two, but nowhere near the number many establishments have in place, nor in locations directly adjacent to customer seating.

      If a business doesn't like people plugging in, the simple solution is to remove the outlet, splice the wires together, and put a plate over the wiring box. Problem solved.

      Yaz.

    86. Re:what about the other leachers? by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      I think I'd ask if the outlet was covered. Otherwise I wouldn't bother.

      --

      +++ATH0
    87. Re:what about the other leachers? by pyite · · Score: 1

      Anyone know of any man-made gravity field generators?.

      Yea, it's called mass.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    88. Re:what about the other leachers? by NateTech · · Score: 1

      I believe if you look at building codes, it's required to place a certain number of outlets along any wall that has ANY of them or you must get a waiver.

      I think the original purpose of this was to discourage the use of cheap extension cords.

      Also I have no idea if it's only a residential thing, or if it also applies to businesses. I just read it somewhere when looking up some information on electrical codes for residential use in the U.S.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    89. Re:what about the other leachers? by Dr.+Sigmund+Freud · · Score: 1
      Starbucks is in the business of providing gourmet coffee bean derivatives in a seemingly up-scale environment. The fact that people decide to bring their laptops, jack in, and suck power, wasn't their choice.
      Actually, Starbucks wants you to bring your laptop and surf using their store's wifi hotspot (courtsey T-mobile), all the while sipping on their $4 fraps.

    90. Re:what about the other leachers? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Okay, the RIAA/MPAA examples are clear enough, but what's this about Best Buy?

    91. Re:what about the other leachers? by kfg · · Score: 1

      I interpreted your "just fucking cope" comment to include none of these "countermeasures". . .

      Definition of cope

      KFG

    92. Re:what about the other leachers? by Hanzie · · Score: 1
      what's this about Best Buy?


      BestBuy is trying to get rid of their own "leaches" who are costing a bit more than a laptop's power.



      BestBuy is tracking sales and returns. Unprofitable customers are going to be refused return privleges. It's an interesting idea, and it's quite nice of BestBuy to volunteer to be the guinea pig.



      They're betting their problem customers will get pissed off and leave, while the non-problem customers won't know the difference



      Being in sales myself, I understand what they're trying to accomplish, though it could turn into a public-relations nightmare. I don't shop there anyway, so it's really not too much beyond a theoretical study for me.

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    93. Re:what about the other leachers? by bynary · · Score: 1

      Ha, ha! No, seriously. Mass is not man-made. In fact, mass isn't made at all. It's an inherent property of all physical matter.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    94. Re:what about the other leachers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems the facts would be that the sole purpose of women at a strip club is to provide sex. That is the reason the place exists, to turn people on with displays of sexually suggestive dancing, etc.

      The sole purpose of women at a strip club is to provide sex. Haven't been to one before?

  2. Step 3, Profit by pnevin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In some cases, those staking a claim do so by plugging in a device - even a $2,000 laptop - only to leave it unattended while fetching a $4 coffee.

    ... as their insurer takes care of that pesky dead battery problem.

  3. I have to admit.... by Michael+Dorfman · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have to admit that I do this all the time, especially in airports-- and it is getting harder and harder to find places to recharge.

    1. Re:I have to admit.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      especially in airports

      The USAir club at Laguardia has all of two outlets near it's bar (there may be others over by the work cubicles). How ridiculous! I want to be able to check my Notes, surf and quickly get my drink refilled. With all of the business travelers, you would think they would put in a bunch of power outlets. Then again, USAir is in bankruptcy.

    2. Re:I have to admit.... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Sugestion, bring a power strip with you. This way, if there are no free outlets, you can "make" one.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  4. Pah! by Aggamemnon · · Score: 1

    I've done it and I've never had a problem through doing. Makes one wonder at the motivation of those who are too mean and stingy to let people charge up their iPod in a public place.

    1. Re:Pah! by acariquara · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Good call. I don't know how's stuff in Yankeeville, but here in Brazil it's commonplace in airports, for example, to have tables with lots of electrical outlets specifically for the purpose of charging cellphones and laptops for on-the-go users. No charge. And it's not even inside a coffeehouse or whatever, it's clearly marked at the waiting room.

      I guess courtesy is out of order at the good ol' US of A.

      (and no, this is not a troll, more a rant...)

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    2. Re:Pah! by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the good ol' US of A, the main point is that it's up to the person who owns the table/outlet/electricity to decide who gets to use it and how. Now, if that business thinks their bottom line is getting eaten alive by people charging cell phones, they're crazy. However: it's up to them to decide that.

      The other thing that we have in the US of A is a long history of watching foolish businesses go OUT of business. That's the miracle of capitalism! Sounds like Brazil already gets it (in terms of businesses providing these services), but I'd rather that we talk in terms of the companies involved getting it or not, not the country.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    3. Re:Pah! by acariquara · · Score: 1

      The other thing that we have in the US of A is a long history of watching foolish businesses go OUT of business. That's the miracle of capitalism! Sounds like Brazil already gets it (in terms of businesses providing these services), but I'd rather that we talk in terms of the companies involved getting it or not, not the country. Nicely put. Brazil's economy is far more challenging than US' - competition tend to be more fierce around here, and those who "don't get it" actually don't get any. I could rant a lot about culture, openness (is that even a word?) but that's it. Money is scarce, and the few(er) wealthy customers tend to spend their with places that treat them well, and not give them strange looks if they are just charging their already-overpriced cell phones at their facilities - not that any of this applies to airports, but anyway.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    4. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was about a year or so ago. The Japanese police made precedent that you are NOT allowed to steal eletricity to recharge your cell phone, by arresting a couple people for... theft of electricity. (They used an open power outlet infront of a store.) The damage? $0.01. Really. That's what the damage report said. (Well, it said something like 1 yen.)

      In reality, the problem apparently wasn't so much being a meanie or cheap ass, but that high-school kids would unplug outdoor signs to recharge their phones, or simply sit infront of stores while their phones were recharging. Whey the police never bothered to apply a loitering law (which exists) in the cases is beyond me....

    5. Re:Pah! by gkuz · · Score: 1
      The other thing that we have in the US of A is a long history of watching foolish businesses go OUT of business

      Please explain sugar or tobacco subsidies.

    6. Re:Pah! by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Farmers dont generally farm one crop. They farm a cash crop, and a crop in the off season, out season, or rotation season. Without the cash crop, there is no "other crop", which generally is foodstuff.

      Without many of the government handouts farmers get, there would be no farming in the US except for high priced exportable or niche products. That means we'd be dependent on foreign food only, which is so dangerous it's absurd.

    7. Re:Pah! by gkuz · · Score: 1
      Farmers dont generally farm one crop.

      What is the alternate crop for sugar cane farmers, who are guaranteed by the USDA a price about 3x the world price?

      That means we'd be dependent on foreign food only, which is so dangerous it's absurd

      Relying on Brazilian sugar to make Coke is more dangerous than having our entire economy dependent on Middle Eastern oil?

    8. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about paying for your electricity? Not only is it theft, it's rude. Maybe if more people asked before they plugged in, business owners might not be so concerned.

    9. Re:Pah! by WyerByter · · Score: 1

      The other side of the story is in some Asian countries I have heard of people being arrested for stealing electricity.

      --

      This signiture copied from somewhere.
    10. Re:Pah! by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      I think I heard about a kid in germany getting arrested for plugging his phone into an outlet at a train station. He used about 0.01 cents (0.0001 dollars) of electricity.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    11. Re:Pah! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the UK even the trains have these power points - specifically marked 'for laptops'.

      The airports are full of them... in the 1st class lounge you even get a desk to work on, and they provide a Wireless LAN.

      I've not seem them in resaraunts yet but I probably don't frequent the right establishments.

    12. Re:Pah! by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      more dangerous than having our entire economy dependent on Middle Eastern oil?

      There are reasons behind the madness. Current administration has put more funding behind alternate fuels after Clinton cut funding so they are still playing catch-up. Facts following are from here.

      It has been cheaper since the 50s to import oil than it is to mine our own (not to mention we have a reserve if others run dry). Oil only comprises of 40% of our energy use. The other 60% is our economy shifting away from this dependence. The dependence exists because...basically....half the worlds oil is in the middle east. It isn't a political issue like Kerry wanted to present it...its a matter of where the oil is physically and you can't do anything about that (see pie chart on link above).

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    13. Re:Pah! by RichardX · · Score: 5, Funny

      I used to steal electricity.. at first it was just the occasional pocketful, but it soon escalated. Before I knew it I was running carloads of electricity across the border at a time, running a major smuggling operation and selling to some of the underworld's most shadowy consumers of electricity.. it's a slippery slope, I'd advise you to stay well clear

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    14. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, you don't know how's stuff in "Yankeeville", you moron. Didn't you even read the freaking article? It only mentioned one person, a waitress, who complained about electricity leeching. All the other places it talked about here in Yankeeville didn't seem to have a problem.

    15. Re:Pah! by Politburo · · Score: 1

      In the good ol' US of A, the main point is that it's up to the person who owns the table/outlet/electricity to decide who gets to use it and how.

      GP never said otherwise. They merely said that it would be courteous for these people who own the outlet to provide it free to their customers. I think that makes a lot of sense, no matter what country you're in.

    16. Re:Pah! by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      My father did some business with several large metro airports that were upgrading their facilities. High on the list was upgrading the concessions. All of the airports were installing micro-cells within the buildings to capture cell phone revenue. They were also putting in wireless hotspots, and selling pre-paid wi-fi cards (i.e. time on the net) at all the concourse shops. Some airports are installing laptop workstations that strongly resemble the sit-down payphone kiosks. The wired/wireless lan connections and the power outlet are enabled by swiping your pre-paid card that you just purchased. Other airports offer convenient power outlets, with the expectation that you'll enjoy your trip through the facility, and will travel there again in the future.

    17. Re:Pah! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Recall my comment about foolish businesses? These businesses were smart enough to line up enough political clout, voters, and crazy legislation to stay subsidized. Rotten, maybe... sleazy maybe... but perhaps not foolish.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    18. Re:Pah! by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      And my point (read my comment!) is that it IS a good idea, but it's up to the business owners and their own interest in STAYING in business to embrace that good idea. I'm just trying to deflect, early on, any notion that they should HAVE to.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    19. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      150K killed in tsunami = disaster. 250K Kurds killed by Saddam = ok by Bush bashers.
      If that is why we are in Iraq, why are we ignoring what has been happening in Darfour? Oh yeah, they don't have any oil - silly me.

    20. Re:Pah! by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Yes, having a food shortage in the US would be a disaster. A truly awful thing to imagine from a security perspective. We need to be able to grow our own food, even if it is cheaper to simply import it. The ability to fundamentally self-sustain your people is a major hurdle in being a stable nation.

      Wheat, corn, sugar, diary, vegetables, berries, nuts, various fruits and other grown products are key to being a stable nation. If all the farmers go out of business due to foreign competition the nation is profoundly weakened. Our economy would be totally controlled by outside forces - which is a diaster.

      Imagine. OPEC can mess with our economy by shifting production and raising or lowering prices. Fine. The effect is somewhat delayed: oil produced today doesn't get to my car until a solid 5-6 months have gone by.

      Food is different. Much of it spoils. Much of it is needed *exactly* when it is needed, not before and not after. If a nation decided to devalue the US dollar by force, it could collude to with hold food shipments for, say, two weeks. Supermarket store shelves will literally run dry within another week. A run on all kinds of products will ensue, and prices will skyrocket. The average American family is unused to inflation in a dramatic fashion. Food bills going from $100-150 a week to $300 a week will destroy the budget of even affluent households. That difference in money means the family has gone from $150 a week in discrentionary spending to zero, or less than zero. And that could *literally* kill the US economy, depression era style crash. Industry after industry would fail if food prices doubled. Entertainment, okay no big loss. Credit as people default on loans and credit to pay for necessary items. Auto as the amount of car a person can afford decreased. Vacation, tourism, home building/constructio - every aspect of the American economy would be challened by a sudden rise in food prices.

      Oil usuage - despite what people tell you - are fairly elastic. Some people need X gallons to function: commuting to work, deliveries, shopping, etc. But a lot of the gasoline and home heating oil used in the country is very much a measure of how much is available.

    21. Re:Pah! by gkuz · · Score: 1
      So the US taxpayers need to be spending $1billion/yr to subsidize peanuts? I don't buy that.

      But a lot of the gasoline and home heating oil used in the country is very much a measure of how much is available.

      Bullshit. I have to heat my house. My usage of home heating oil is purely a function of the average temperature. If it's cold, I have to buy about 250 gallons per month regardless of the price, or my family freezes. The argument that it's supply-dependent is absurd. If supply is greater or the price is lower I don't raise the thermostat or shower four times a day.

    22. Re:Pah! by geekboy642 · · Score: 0

      For the skeptical(I was), here's the kid's blog, auto-translated courtesy of google.
      JMBlog, he also links to a bunch of news sites about the incident.
      Sheesh, remind me never to visit Germany.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    23. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations, you sank to a level so low no one even bothered to mod you "Flamebait".

    24. Re:Pah! by mig0 · · Score: 1

      having our entire economy dependent on Middle Eastern oil?


      We don't get most of our oil from the middle east.
    25. Re:Pah! by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      Preach it, brother. I followed the same path until I got busted. I had to serve 1000 kilowatt-hours of community service.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    26. Re:Pah! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      If your customers are doing something you don't want them to do, put up a sign.

      That way, I'll know to take my business elsewhere.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    27. Re:Pah! by bbuR_bbuB · · Score: 1

      One's usage of heating energy is not purely a function of the average temperature. It's a function of many things such as the number of rooms you use in the winter, the state of the house's weatherproofing, one's comfort level, and so on.

      It's always possible to turn the thermostat down another two degrees and put on a sweater. That can provide significant savings, especially for those people who walk around in bermuda shorts inside during the winter. How about not heating your bathroom? Do you really need it to be toasty warm? It sure does suck in the morning when it's chilly, but when you're in the room only 20 minutes a day or so including shaving and showers and regular use, it seems pretty wasteful to keep it heated.

      When times are tough, instead of feeding the machine, it is possible to conserve more. When gas got more expensive, I drove less and biked more. When tomatoes were really expensive due to 'hurricanes', I ate less tomatoes.

      Of course, if you want to keep your house at 75 or 80 degrees, you can feel free, and you can enjoy the nice warm fuzzy feeling of making the oil companies richer.

    28. Re:Pah! by amorsen · · Score: 1

      If oil became significantly more expensive, you'd insulate your house and/or switch to better fuels (wood would be the obvious choice, since it is available in cheap forms which are easy to handle.) 1000l of oil consumed in a month for a single home is ridiculous anyway.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    29. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just in case anyone in the UK decides to use power sockets on the trains, its probably worth noting that only the newer, or recently refurbished, trainsets have these sockets specifically for laptops/phones. Older trains may appear to have standard UK sockets but beware using them as they are often directly connected to the ETH generator on the locomotive. This can be *very* dirty and give you nice expensive electronic toy a bad headache. This definately applies to the sockets near/in the luggage racks on the original 1970s High Speed Trains (as used by MML, GNER and FGW). These sockets are for cleaner's vacuums when they are stabled and connected to a steady shore supply.

    30. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's because deep down inside, they know he really _is_ a moron, but they can't say anything, because he made an US-bashing comment (good) and I made a pro-US comment (very very bad on /.)

    31. Re:Pah! by gkuz · · Score: 1
      It's always possible to turn the thermostat down another two degrees and put on a sweater

      Been there, done that. Multiple heating zones, programmable thermostats, high-efficiency oil burner, etc., etc. My point was that grandparent poster was saying usage of home heating oil is supply-driven. I was saying it isn't, and you haven't contradicted that. When I have already taken all the energy-saving measures you list and more, and have gotten accustomed to that, then if the price drops or the supply increases I don't suddenly remove those measures and crank up the thermostat to 80. I continue on as I did and enjoy spending less with the oil dealer. So do my neighbors. But when the average daily temp runs about 20F for a month, I have to buy oil regardless of the price. Converting the heating plant to another fuel is simply not economical.

    32. Re:Pah! by bbuR_bbuB · · Score: 1

      The people I know who use oil heat make a large purchase (typically enough to last the entire winter) to 'lock in' a price when prices are low (or, surplus oil is available). Then, the oil company delivers that oil all winter at the agreed-upon price. The oil company is happy because they have their cash in advance and the customer is happy because they're getting oil at a better price than if they had just got it from whoever's delivering in the neighborhood. I may be misunderstanding you, but it seems like their purchases of oil are at least somewhat supply-driven. In other words, instead of purchasing oil when supplies are tighter in the winter, they make their purchase at a time when everyone's oil burners are off. For the record, my experience with this is in NJ.

    33. Re:Pah! by gkuz · · Score: 1
      The people I know who use oil heat make a large purchase (typically enough to last the entire winter) to 'lock in' a price

      Given the price volatility of the last 2-3 years, very few dealers will do that any more, at least here in New England.

    34. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, as I read, there was no bashing involved. Maybe a little over the top with the "Yankeeville", but I sense more of strangeness/righteous indignation. - ie GP could not understand all the fuss and just thought, "wtf?"

    35. Re:Pah! by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

      Other airports offer convenient power outlets, with the expectation that you'll enjoy your trip through the facility, and will travel there again in the future.

      "Hey, Kim, where would you like to go for vacation this year, Rio or Paris?"

      "Does Orly have free Wi-Fi and power outlets?"

      "Lemme check.... looks like no."

      "That sucks. Guess Rio's getting our money this year."

      I think this point was sort of made somewhere above where someone suggested that airlines could choose to land in Baghdad rather than London to avoid the huge landing fees.

      OK, niceties like Wi-Fi might make a difference for an airport's bottom line in cases where people actually have a choice, say BWI vs. Dulles or Gipper National. But for most places, your choices are using the airport, using a completely different mode of transportation (yeah, I'm sure they have Wi-Fi on the train from Pittsburgh to Philly!) or not going to/leaving the city at all.

      --
      one hundred twenty
      is just enough characters
      to write a haiku
    36. Re:Pah! by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      No, the destination isn't biased by the airport selection any more than it would be by rental car availability. Consider that you've got two flights that will get you to {$destination} for the same number of sheckels. Consider also that this is a business trip. One flight routes you through Albany's old armpit terminal, and the other routes you though Baltimore's BWI terminal. Both flights have a three-hour layover on the connection. BWI has Boingo service for wifi. Albany has iPass and Airpass. If you have a Boingo account, you're more likely to route through BWI. Hey! The wifi aspect just helped with your purchasing decision.

    37. Re:Pah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you're a moron. get the fuck out of slashdot.

  5. Leeching???? by Herby+Werby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They don't bat an eye at helping yourself to serviettes or sugar but a little juice gets a 'leeching' tag?

    1. Re:Leeching???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Napkins, you limey bastard.

    2. Re:Leeching???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird; does "limey" mean British or English here?

      'Cos I can tell you now that *I* call them napkins, and "serviettes" sounds distinctly posh to me (I'm a Scot, but I don't think this is a Scottish v English thing).

    3. Re:Leeching???? by halcyon1234 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They don't bat an eye at helping yourself to serviettes or sugar but a little juice gets a 'leeching' tag?

      Intersting note: On campus, there is a cafe that charges for napkins, cream, water refils-- anything. They "get away with it" because they're the only cafe on campus (it's a small campus).

      Of course, the minute they implimented that policy, every resteraunt in a five block radius saw a huge jump in buisness.

      Or as the students put it: "You want me to pay $.25 for a napkin? Fuck you, I'm going across the street!" =)

    4. Re:Leeching???? by Herby+Werby · · Score: 1

      I think that if someone offered me a napkin, I'd expect cloth not paper. To me, serviettes are the trashy, probably free, paper versions of the posh item.

  6. Re:WEP ? by ViXX0r · · Score: 1

    The summary indicates the article is referring to use of power (electrical outlets) not wireless access. WEP would clearly have no place if preventing this.

    --
    University - a box of academia nuts.
  7. Ffs... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 0

    "It is part of the culture," said Mr. Lebrun, 27, who finds it necessary to charge his cellphone in the classroom because its battery can manage little more than three hours of talk time

    Buy a better phone, then. Those brick-sized analogue phones are kind of obsolete now, especially since they tore down all the analogue masts...

    1. Re:Ffs... by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1
      Buy a better phone, then.

      3 hours of talk time is actually normal for a modern phone, if not exhibitng good battery life. As always, if he wants to complain he ought to buy the extended battery, but that is a whole other story.

    2. Re:Ffs... by cmiller173 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...especially since they tore down all the analogue masts...

      er, no they did not tear down the analog masts. Some rural locations (I have a friend that commutes 2hr to the city from the boondocks every day) are still well served by analog systems. Additionally GM's OnStar service is carried mostly by Verizon's old analog system because analog still has more complete coverage that digital (again especially in rural areas)

      Back on topic, he said talk time, 180 min is pretty standard for most digital phones talktime.

    3. Re:Ffs... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Presumably you're in the US, with its Third-World grade mobile phone service. Just you try and use analogue phones anywhere in the EU...

  8. Re:WEP ? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


    I'd be interesting in you telling me how I can protect my electricity supply with WEP ?

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  9. Not like it really COSTS anything. by Archeopteryx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Geeze, you could have a cafe full of plugged in laptop users and still not have this cost you 25 cents an hour.

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
    1. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by MrRuslan · · Score: 5, Funny

      hmm...thats not a bad idea...perhaps they should make parking meeter style outlets for 25 cents a per half hour with a 2 hour limit...and 10 minutes and with a 30 minute limit in Manhatan. Quick someone patent that!

    2. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      These things already exist ..... sort of.

      The last camp site I stayed on -- and the one before that -- had showers which required a 20p coin to operate them. The coin box operated a timer, which operated a solenoid valve in the cold feed to the water heater {the timer contacts probably aren't rated for the 30-40 amps a shower requires. Strictly speaking they'll probably be OK passing so many amps, but they'd have a job interrupting them}. When the timer ran out {which Sod's law dictates will be just at the most critical point of the whole operation} the water shut off, and with no water flowing through it the heater also shut off {and the lights in the facility block went back to full brightness}. Sounds like these would do the job nicely!

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have these here in Thailand.

      A huge wall with lots of interesting wires and connectors 'leaking' from it. You put in 10 Baht, press the button that corresponds to the connector you're plugged into and charge away.

      Problem is, you have to stand there the whole time. Combining the technology with the trusty old coin-operated locker might be a good idea.

    4. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A While ago, at the public Library around my house they had something like this on there Apple II computers, You had to pay to turn the power on for the computer, then the box would give you a 5 min warning when power was going to be shut down, if you didn't pay, the computer power would be shut off.

    5. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by Ratcrow · · Score: 1

      The airport in Tampa already does this (at least in one terminal). All of the power outlets along the walls are turned off, and there are credit-card-reader equipped outlets in some cubicles with tables for laptops. The rate for power was something like $4/hour, IIRC, whereas power here usually costs more like $0.25/kWh (so they are charging something like 500 times more for power than the local utility company, assuming a 30 watt load from the laptop).

    6. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by rs79 · · Score: 1

      Some real world power costs here in Ontario.

      A comtemporary PC costs $9/mo to run 24x7.

      A sun E4500 costs $80/mo.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    7. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by Archeopteryx · · Score: 1

      Well, I see it this way;

      A laptop power supply uses about 40 watts.

      A kilowatt-hour in Chicago costs avout 12 cents per kilowatt-hour.

      So you can serve about 20 laptop users for 12 cents an hour.

      Figure 40 seats in a busy cafe, and you get about 25 cents an hour.

      Contrast this cost with the goodwill you get and the additional espresso consumed by people happily working on their laptops, and it is free!

      --
      Dog is my co-pilot.
    8. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Regan National Airport told me when I checked in for my flight where I could go to sit down and plug in for free. I was impressed.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    9. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      No, not free, just cheap. It now costs you an additional $5/day not to tick off your most wealthy clients.

      This is an example of how the standard of living increases.

    10. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      you could have a cafe full of plugged in laptop users and still not have this cost you 25 cents an hour.

      Now consider the lost business because people passing by outside see that you're full, and go some place else.

    11. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      It's not really the cost that bothers them, it's the fact that there is no flashing light on the laptop that says "This laptop was charged at STARBUCKS(TM)".

    12. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they're not. They're charging you for the space, desk, chair, convinience. Don't like it? Lug around an extra bettery or two and deal.

    13. Re:Not like it really COSTS anything. by gwiner · · Score: 1

      While I am dead set against this practice, keep in mind they also need to cover + employee overhead + space + legal and business fees + R&D and production of the system that manages it all + chairs, desks,tables, etc. + 3rd party fees ...And I'm sure they'd like to live above the Federal Poverty Level, so add some in for profit, and $4/hr seems fairly realistic. If you want to be pissed off, get mad at the scum-suckers downstream that charge thousands for a business license, tens of thousands for leasing space, lawyers that charge $300/hour to help set the business up, and all the others that add to the overhead [tounge firmly in cheek]. My point is, countries with high standards of living pay a premium for everything, just because of the sheer cost of sustaining it. Go to Bangladesh, and I'll bet their fees are much more inline with their economy.

  10. I don't leech! by MrRuslan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I borrow. Sometimes with interest!

    1. Re:I don't leech! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Visit my website for tech support. I just started so there is not much there but..
      ..a whole lot of flash. Flash, Flash, Flash. How about not giving visitors motion-sickness? I'm no usability expert, but geez - a website that makes my cursor move slow over the page because of the animation required to display a paragraph of text? HTML is perfect for this scenario, lashings of flash is overkill. Not meaning to flame - but you asked people to visit.. :)

    2. Re:I don't leech! by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      I'll get arond to deflashafying it one of these days LoL

    3. Re:I don't leech! by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      I borrow. Sometimes with interest!

      I'm not leeching either. My laptop is helping to heat the establishment, providing extra light, and some background noise.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  11. Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by multipartmixed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in January 1998, when a good hunk of Canada had no power due to an ice storm, I couldn't go to work because we had no power at the office. I also had no power at home, and was bored out of my tree.

    So, I grabbed a pair of APC BackUPS 400s, threw them in a knapsack, and walked to the local pub (which DID have power). Plugged 'em in, had a few beers, walked home, watched TV; repeat.

    I tell ya, though, my back was kinda sore. Those things ain't made to be portable!

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by alexandre · · Score: 1

      haha didn't try that one!

      I was having too much fun riding ice moutains where people usually go with there toboggan.

    2. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      I also had no power at home, and was bored out of my tree.

      Then...

      walked home, watched TV; repeat.

      I see some inconsistence here... Watch TV without power at home?

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    3. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      Doh! Too much blood in my coffee. Sorry.

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    4. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by georgi55 · · Score: 1

      Duh, that's why he carried the UPS and his back hurt. Read the post.

    5. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Hey, my dad grabbed an inverter and a car battery to watch tv with during the last all day power outage here. A slight buzzing noise was the only anoyance. Oddly enough the battery lasted many hours, I was shocked.

    6. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by Taladar · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, there are these things called 'books' that work without power I've heard...

    7. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      My wife drives a Pontiac Vibe which has a 115V outlet in it. It's not grounded, but with one of those two-prong to three-prong adapters it would power a TV nicely. Until it ran out of gas, that is.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    8. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DER!! My Name Is menkhaura

    9. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plugged 'em in, had a few beers, walked home, watched TV;

      You should've had a few more beers... You would've stayed at the pub, entertained the patrons, and forgotten about the whole outage in the morning.

    10. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by dorsey · · Score: 1

      ...only during the day. Kinda hard to read a book without light. Well, unless it's written in braille.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    11. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Do you have a car? Might have been less work to wire the car to the UPS and have plenty of electricity. Of course, you lose out on all the pub/beery goodness.

      Rich

    12. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by drivers · · Score: 1

      I thought TVs don't have three prong outlets. I realized this while setting up my TV area in my old rental house that had no three prong outlets. Then I realized that all of the following had two prong outlets: TV (even a big screen one), tivo, stereo, dvd player, vcr, ps2, gamecube, etc. Everything related to TV and so on is two prong. (I'm in the US.)

    13. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      Well, they don't. But if I had to run a fridge or something, I'd be set.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    14. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Ironically a lot of it has to do with preventing ground loops and reducing other interference; which is also why most of those devices you mention have a standalone ground lug so that you can run them from an isolated ground if you feel so inclined.

    15. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ever heard of fire?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    16. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *yawn*

    17. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      We had a three day power outage because of an ice storm last month. I ended up reading books using my maglite mini as a light source.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    18. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      That's funny, my girlfriend also rides a vibe but her's only runs on three double A batteries.
      Trust me when that sucker runs out of gas, I know about it....

    19. Re:Charging an iPod? That's NOTHING by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 1

      Where do you think most of your electricity comes from, hmm?

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
  12. Re:When are you guys going to go to grade school? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    Seems perfectly plain to me, perhaps it is *you* who need schooling!

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  13. Batteries by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1
    Make a battery for a laptop that lasts longer than 2 hrs and then leeching might slow...

    (Centrino, Macs are better yadda yadda I know)

    1. Re:Batteries by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      or what about a wind up laptop?

      --
      moo
    2. Re:Batteries by jamiethehutt · · Score: 1

      (Centrino, Macs are better yadda yadda I know)

      I dont know about you but my day lasts longer than 6 hours, even laptops with "good battery life" dont.

    3. Re:Batteries by 3point1415927 · · Score: 1

      Good call...even my cute and absurdly small Sony Vaio (with its purposely low-voltage 1.1 gHz processor and battery, screen, and other features made to be really long-lasting) can't last more than 6 hours in general.

    4. Re:Batteries by michrech · · Score: 1

      You mean like those?

      There were some others I saw back on either Fresh Gear or Screen Savers, but I can't remember the name for the life of me. Google isn't any help because I can't remember the name. "high capacity batteries" just brings up a ton of sites with laptop batteries.. :(

      The others I was thinking of could let you go up to 12 hours on their batteries, but they were considerably more expensive than the batterygeek batteries...

      --
      bork bork bork!
  14. On permission by The+Slashdotted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whenever I've visited a resturant, I've asked permission 99% of the time.. unless it's an emergency. (What's an emergency to you?) I've been turned down some times, but remind them you'll buy more, or *gasp* pay a dollar or two for the privelige.. Once in Arby's I was denied permission, and got a wierd look.. Then the manager thought better, said not to put the cord of the floor, and I bought food to go.

    1. Re:On permission by cheezit · · Score: 1

      If a wierd look is all you get from eating at Arby's (*gag* *hurl*), you're a lucky person.

      --
      Premature optimization is the root of all evil
    2. Re:On permission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have never plugged in at a retaraunt i just find it really unconfortable to carry a conversation with someone who is in a different place always feel as i am talking to myself or dont have any privacy,and dont ferquent coffe shops. but when traveling i do plug in. in my eyes they are sitting wide open and not as if i am paying $300 for a single person traveling who only needs to call his ride when he finally lands and friends for company. the food is at horrendus prices too, $7 for a pizza and a ned drink at detroit and this is not to say that it makes it inharently the right thing to do i have just never been asked to stop.

  15. How bout fuel cells? by thewldisntenuff · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to them? Theyre supposed to save us from having to having to charge like that.....Top off the.....methanol?....and go....

    I personally cant wait til theyre readily available....Does anybody have any info?

    Back on topic - I dont think many businesses have a problem with people doing so...Power consumption cant be too too bad, and it brings in traffic...

    -thewldisntenuff

    1. Re:How bout fuel cells? by mariusster · · Score: 1

      My guess is these fuel cells are right near the flying cars in the garage of lost inventions... And these will stay there for the next 80 years or whatever it takes us to eat up all the remaining oil reserves.

    2. Re:How bout fuel cells? by pentalive · · Score: 1

      Ok you chemical guys!

      Make us a Fuel Cell that works on black coffee. It should fit in a .5 foot cube and supply 15 amps to
      a single outlet on the surface.

      -- Oh Waitress! Another cofee for me, and one for my cubic freind here too.--

  16. Not really a problem, giving the billing structure by lxt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As far as cost goes, it shouldn't really be too much of a problem for many businesses, assuming they are charged on the same basis as the power companies do here in the UK. Companies (at least, the theatres I work in) are not charged according to the number of units used, but by the maximum amount of power they use during the billing period. For example, during a theatre show we use a hell of a lot of power, and the power companies takes this peak rate and charges us across the board at that rate. I don't know whether this is just limited to certain businesses.

  17. It's not leeching by nucal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I'm having an overpriced cup of coffee at Starbucks and paying for WiFi, they damn well better let me plug in ...

    1. Re:It's not leeching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're drinking coffee at Starbucks then you're a retard and don't need a reason you justify your leeching.

    2. Re:It's not leeching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Uh, didn't the OP say that?

    3. Re:It's not leeching by gkuz · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It says that Starbuck's doesn't care, doesn't meter, doesn't track.

  18. Great idea, really! by Archeopteryx · · Score: 1

    Do it!

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
    1. Re:Great idea, really! by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      Wow...it would not surprise me if someone would...

  19. Airport taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do this all the time (or rather anytime I can since they tend to hide those more and more...). Well, when I take the plane, I pay an airport tax, which I believe covers the charges of the mere kWh I borrow. I mean, what about that guys that drink the water in the restroom. Aren't they leechers, also?

    1. Re:Airport taxes by w.p.richardson · · Score: 1
      I mean, what about that guys that drink the water in the restroom

      Presumably, you mean from the sink? I gave up the water from the toilet several years ago.

      --

      Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    2. Re:Airport taxes by sxpert · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!
      nah, get rid of bush & friends

  20. Blown-Air Hand Driers: enough juice for... by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what, 50 laptops? The point is, public-ish facilities that want or depend on public traffic don't lose much by being accommodating, and no doubt generate some good will among the lithium-ion set. The guy that uses a lot more paper towels or flushes twice in a public bathroom is chewing up a LOT more overheard than the lady who's trickle-charging her laptop (let alone her cellphone).

    I'd say the bigger cost is the risk of liability when one Starbucks customer trips over the power cord of another customer's laptop. You know, the one the user has stretched from the pillar in the middle of the room over to his table, where he's /.ing

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Blown-Air Hand Driers: enough juice for... by beders · · Score: 1

      ...customer trips over the power cord of another customer's laptop

      Simple! Use wireless power :)

  21. Re:When are you guys going to go to grade school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's perfectly grammatically correct, though a comma after "frequent" might help things along.

  22. Re:When are you guys going to go to grade school? by Herby+Werby · · Score: 1

    Seems perfectly plain to me, perhaps it is *you* who need schooling!

    Can someone tell me whether "it" or "you" is supposed to be the pronoun here? I reckon it's "it" in which case "need" should be "needs".

  23. If they have a problem with it... by jmcmunn · · Score: 2


    Just make all of the outlets which are in public spaces under lock and key. That'd stop the vast majority.

    Then, to make an extra buck they can have a little "power cafe" if you will. Same idea as getting a little internet time somewhere, but you go plug in to recharge instead. Personally, I'd pay a dollar for the right to plug in and charge from a single outlet for whatever time I am there. I think most people who needed to charge something would pay out a dollar, and the airports could make good money offerring it at that price.

    1. Re:If they have a problem with it... by egburr · · Score: 1
      Based on my home electric bill, one dollar powers my entire house (air conditioner, refrigerator, 3 computers, lights, electric stove/oven, TV, stereo, DVD player, fans, etc.) for about 5-6 hours. I most certainly would not be willing to pay one dollar just to charge my phone or computer for an hour, unless I was truly desparate.

      If the cost of electricity is breaking the business, they need to revise their business plan. At the very least, they should look into some energy saving measures, such as maybe turning off a few lights, dim their overly bright signs outside, adjust the thermostat, etc.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    2. Re:If they have a problem with it... by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      You mean like paying $5 for a cup of coffee that can be entirely recreated (whipped cream, caramel and all) at home for a fraction of that?

      Price is not a function of cost. It's a function of demand and value provided to the payer.

      What's a bottle of water worth to you? With a drinking fountain next to you serving filtered, chilled water, pretty much nothing. Sitting in the middle of a desert, after 2 days without water, you'd probably turn over the deed to your house for a bottle of water. Yet, the "cost" of putting 20oz of water into a plastic bottle is pretty much fixed in both situations.

    3. Re:If they have a problem with it... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1

      Very often, hotel lobby and conference area outlets are quite "loose". Whether this is intentional to keep random people from plugging in, or simply the result of the housekeeping staff yanking cords from 10 feet away during the daily vacuuming, it makes it hard to keep most two-prong plugs from falling out. Good for me that my laptop came with a 3-prong cord!

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    4. Re:If they have a problem with it... by egburr · · Score: 1
      Using your water fountain example, that is exactly what people are doing. Who pays for the water in the fountain? The business providing it. I have yet to see a pay meter installed on a water fountain.

      Buying a bottle of water would be about equivalent to buying a battery. I pay for the container, which happens to have contents I want. When empty, I go to the fountain/outlet and refill it.

      Price is a function of cost and benefit, both to the buyer and the seller. If providing a fountain for "free" water did not provide some benefit to the business, they would not endure the cost of it. Providing "free" electricity to customers of the business is another cost that is very minimal (as has been pointed out by many posters here) to the business and provides a huge benefit: happy customers, customers who can stick around longer to purchase more of whatever the business sells instead of leaving to go recharge.

      If the price of that cup of coffee were the same ($5) at two different places, and one place allowed you to use electricity that costs them *maybe* as much as 10 cents, which place would get more business? How many extra $5 cups of coffee would you have to sell to compensate for the 10-cent usage of some customers? Assuming a profit of $1 on the cup, 1 extra cup for every 10 electricity-using customers.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    5. Re:If they have a problem with it... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Based on my home electric bill, one dollar powers my entire house (air conditioner, refrigerator, 3 computers, lights, electric stove/oven, TV, stereo, DVD player, fans, etc.) for about 5-6 hours.

      Sheesh. US$1 pays my electric bill for 6 days. Don't use the AC and don't have an electric stove though.

      I most certainly would not be willing to pay one dollar just to charge my phone or computer for an hour, unless I was truly desparate.

      Same here. Actually, that's the kind of thing that would drive me to take my business elsewhere even if I had no intention of plugging anything in - it's just insulting. It's like the fast food restaurant that charges 25 cents for a cup of water.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  24. Or alternately... by Chordonblue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...he could simply meet the person face to face.

    Seriously, doesn't anyone else here think 3 hours of cell phone yammering every day might be a bit excessive?

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Or alternately... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Seriously, doesn't anyone else here think 3 hours of cell phone yammering every day might be a bit excessive?

      Yes, yes I do. ~6,000 minutes a month is a bit insane. My father is about the only person I know who would and should do that. And that's only because he has a two person business and is on the road 95% of the day calling on customers and working with his business partner. Yammering with your friends on your cellphone about nothing 3+ hours a day is just stupid.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Or alternately... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the real world, moron. Businesspeople travel a lot (for face-to-face meetings!) but still need to communicate while they're on the road.

    3. Re:Or alternately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Significant Others anyone? (Yes, i know this is slashdot but a lot of people easily top 5k+ minutes a month...offpeak mostly)

  25. Well... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    ... my elderly and rather knackered Nokia 6110i manages a good 6 hours of talk time, and several days of standby time. That's with its stock (and now quite old) battery. I have noticed that standby time is getting shorter, but talk time is still good.

  26. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by thetroll123 · · Score: 1

    during a theatre show we use a hell of a lot of power, and the power companies takes this peak rate and charges us across the board at that rate

    Surely not *at that rate*, why in hell would you agree to that? A rate *based on* peak usage, maybe, but not one assuming peak usage continuously!

  27. If you don't want Joe Public to use them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... then stick a padlock on the outlet. But how much will that cost??.

  28. Ah! Too late! by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    There's 'prior art' now... ;)

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Ah! Too late! by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      That's right!!! Yay!!! if I see a the "Outlet Meeter" I have this to prove it was my idea... Omg I can't stop laghing.

    2. Re:Ah! Too late! by sxpert · · Score: 1

      it's not like the patent office would care

    3. Re:Ah! Too late! by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      I know they don't care. But the courts should care about prior art

    4. Re:Ah! Too late! by sxpert · · Score: 1

      they won't, unless you have enough $$$ to pay for a good lawyer

    5. Re:Ah! Too late! by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      If I ever see one of my "Outlet Meeters" (TM) I will cough up the money. Anyone wanna chip down and get rich quick LoL?

  29. Always done it... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Har! Back in 1986 when I was on the road making locale-specific engineering modifications to a pay telephone system I designed, I had an 8085 emulator-in-a-briefcase and a full-size Compaq "Luggable" (8088 12 Mhz 40 MB HD) that I used to plug into airport AC outlets and play Chess and Rouge (Epyx's version for PC) with it while waiting for flights!

    You see, I had no "Geek Shame" back then, and nowadays no one would give me a 2nd look, except perhaps the wonderful TSA folks...

    It also had a nice clock on the screen by a TSR program of some sort, which would remind me when to pack up and go to the gate. Unfortunately, once, after a couple of cocktails, I forgot completely about the whole time zone thing, and missed my flight clean by an hour! But that is another story...

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    1. Re:Always done it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>and play Chess and Rouge

      Rouge? Is that the game where you explore a dungeon and fight monsters in search of the Amulet of Maybelline?

    2. Re:Always done it... by Nerd4News · · Score: 1

      "...when I was on the road making locale-specific engineering modifications to a pay telephone system..."

      Aw, I thought you were going to tell us about running over phone booths with your car.

  30. irritating common error by hb253 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Leeching power is a singular subject, so it's a PHENOMENON, not a PHENOMENA.

    --
    Self awareness - try it!
    1. Re:irritating common error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get over it

    2. Re: irritating common error by j.leidner · · Score: 1

      Many people even say 'a visa' instead of the correct singular 'a visum' (visa is also plural). However, most people don't realize this to be incorrect.

    3. Re: irritating common error by hb253 · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but I checked on Google, dictionary.com, and nhd.heinle.com and none of them had an entry for visum.

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    4. Re:irritating common error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I believe this could go either way, if you consider that there are many people engaging in this phenomenon, making the collective phenomema.

    5. Re: irritating common error by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Many people even say 'a visa' instead of the correct singular 'a visum' (visa is also plural).

      In Latin, visa is the plural of visus. I believe the English usage of visa comes from the French, who corrupted the plurality before we did.

    6. Re: irritating common error by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Many people even say 'a visa' instead of the correct singular 'a visum' (visa is also plural). However, most people don't realize this to be incorrect.

      Probably because those people are speaking English, where it is correct.

      Latin speakers with Roman passports carved from stone tablets have bigger problems to worry about.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  31. If only... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    ...kinetic storage could be made practical for that sort of medium. Unfortunately the power consumption is far too great for that I think.

    Maybe in cooperation with solar panels though... BIG ones!

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:If only... by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      OLED displays don't use backlights right? maybe when laptops start sporting them it would be feasible..

      --
      moo
  32. Virgin Trains by pklong · · Score: 5, Informative


    Here in the UK Virgin has been putting power outlets for charging up phones and laptops next to all the seats in their new trains.

    So you could go on a pleasure trip and charge up (but given the state of the UK rail system that might not be a good idea if you need to make it to something on time. )

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

    1. Re:Virgin Trains by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1

      Plugging into the Virgin train..for pleasure you say? Why am I not in the UK already!!

    2. Re:Virgin Trains by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Last time I was on the VIA in Canada from Detriot to Toronto I had a power plug next to me where I sat. It was great, 3 hour train ride, laptop and DVD's (oh and a 802.11 usb wireless suction cupped to the window so I can see how many wireless points I was able to find..

      it was great. made the ride really enjoyable.

      it seems that catering to your customers is important outside the United States.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Virgin Trains by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2

      It's one of the reasons why I travel on the train to Manchester instead of going by car. Car is quicker, and if I was on most train companies trains, I'd get a couple hours of charge at best. On Virgin, I can go the whole journey, which means that I can work.

    4. Re:Virgin Trains by sysadmn · · Score: 1

      So they figured out that it's cheaper and easier to give folks a way to recharge their mobile then make the trains run on time? Clever blokes!

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    5. Re:Virgin Trains by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Last time I was on the VIA in Canada from Detriot to Toronto I had a power plug next to me where I sat. It was great, 3 hour train ride, laptop and DVD's (oh and a 802.11 usb wireless suction cupped to the window so I can see how many wireless points I was able to find.. it was great. made the ride really enjoyable. it seems that catering to your customers is important outside the United States.

      A) Did you read the article? It was all about how store owners in the United States welcomed people plugging in because they thought it made their customers happy.

      B) Amtrak has outlets all over the trains.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    6. Re:Virgin Trains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you read the grandpartent post? it was about how the poster was pissed about store owners being asshats to him.

      Lumpy is right though, in Canada, even just in Windsor, the store,resturant, hell even the street bums are nicer, friendlier, and overall a better place to be.

  33. Leeching? OH, how terrible! by jlehtira · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cellphones, ipods and even portable computers are not that power hungry that it would matter. I consider using the power outlets included in what I pay for coffee, airport tax or whatever. Just like I don't pay extra for breathing air from businesses' ventilator systems (which probably costs more than the power). If some business doesn't like me charging my laptop, I choose to go elsewhere.

    For reference, my portable computer's battery is rated 14.8V, 4400mAh. That roughly equals 65 watt-hours. The biggest cost of electricity I found is 9 cents per kWh, so filling the battery from empty to full would cost less than 0.6 cents. I will gladly pay 0.6 cents extra to use my laptop wherever I go, if asked for.

    1. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your charger isn't 100% efficient, but your point is still valid. The cost here is in pennies per day.

      However, what about the cost of adding more outlets to your building to accomodate your customers? You don't have to do this, but it might get more people in the door.

    2. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by dr_labrat · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't really count the battery's rating, as the transformation of power is not perfect.

      Take the rating of the transformer itself and it will give you a more accurate estimate, however I do agree with your point.

      --
      The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
    3. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by elfin_spectre · · Score: 1

      Just make sure they give you the change from 1 cent!

    4. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by dajak · · Score: 1

      Just make sure they give you the change from 1 cent!

      Here most businesses do not accept eurocents and round amounts up or down because it is too much trouble giving small change. It saves on labour time, weight, and space in the tills.

      If an employee walks over to tell you that you can't use the power outlet, they just spent more money on labour costs than you can steal from them by charging your equipment.

    5. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1


      Cool. Maybe I found a use those mils that my grandpa gave me back when I was a kid.

    6. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by jhagler · · Score: 1

      This made me wonder about my laptop.

      I have a Compaq 610c that takes 1.5 hours to charge from empty if I'm using it, the power supply requires 125V and 1.6A, this works out to 200W or .3 KWh to charge. I pay about 9 cents/KWh at home for electricity, so a complete charge costs 3 cents.

      My average trip to the coffee shop costs about $1.50 and I'm in there for all of 5 min. If I'm actually planning on being there long enough for a full charge I'd probably have 2 cups and maybe a muffin. As soon as I buy that second cup and the muffin, they more than offset the 3 cents worth of power. Any good store owner will think of this as a reason to keep your customers in the shop, the longer we stay, the more we buy, it's that simple.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
    7. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by dr_labrat · · Score: 1

      that really depends on the profit margin they make on the customer that takes your place after you...

      in other words; there are no simple answers or justifications.

      Places will complain if they dont like it.

      But does any one else recall the chap in japan that was charged with theft for doing this...

      --
      The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
    8. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by jhagler · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it really does all depend on utilization of resources. If I am taking up a table for an hour that causes them to not be able to serve five other customers for whatever reason then they definitely do lose money. I don't think that this would be a major problem at your average coffee shop, but a restaurant at an airport might be a completely different story. Let's face it, you don't hear Starbucks complaining, nor has anyone everr given me a hard time for plugging in at one of the airport outlets while I wait for my flight.

      In the airport it is probably to their advantage to let people plug in. I know that the last time I traveled with my daughter (3 years old at the time) my laptop and a copy of Finding Nemo kept har and quite a few other kids entertained after our flight had been delayed.

      I do remember that guy in Japan being arrested, I can't find the news article offhand, I seem to remember that he just plugged into some building where he had no claim to being a customer. Almost like if someone walked up to my house and plugged into one of my external outlets, I know I'd be pissed on general principle. Feel free to correct me if I'm getting any of the details wrong.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
    9. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by cynyr · · Score: 1

      wow you have a large battery.... i can get 3 hours out of mine and it's only 12.496 volts and 1900 mAh, i hope you get 6 hours out of that thing.... :-) granted i have a fujitsu p2110, with *gasp* a transmeta proc in it......yes a real one...

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    10. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      No, I can only get 4 hours max, and playing games etc takes the battery life down to 2-3h. Centrino thing, 1.4GHz with Radeon 9600.. I love it for games too :).

    11. Re:Leeching? OH, how terrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For reference, my portable computer's battery is rated 14.8V, 4400mAh. That roughly equals 65 watt-hours. The biggest cost of electricity I found is 9 cents per kWh, so filling the battery from empty to full would cost less than 0.6 cents. I will gladly pay 0.6 cents extra to use my laptop wherever I go, if asked for.

      I know that, and you know that, but keep in mind that most employees at a restaurant or coffee shop don't have very good math skills. You might be surprised how many people out there are math illiterate. For many of them, if you asked them to divide a 2-digit number by 3, they might have to resort to pen and paper, and even then the answer could easily be wrong.

      Plus, they are likely to have NO IDEA what a kilowatt-hour is or how much power your laptop uses. I would be willing to bet money that the majority of restaurant employees have never read and understood the part of their electric bill that explains the usage and also the majority of restaurant employees could not tell you whether a kilowatt-hour costs more than 50 cents or less than 50 cents.

      A typical slashdot probably has a clue about how much electricity a laptop is using and how much electricity costs. I would guess no more than 50 watts for a laptop. That means 20 hours to use one 1 kWh. Since 1 kWh is probably no more than 10 cents, 2 hours' usage shouldn't be more than 1 cent. (Just to verify, I plugged my old IBM Thinkpad into my Kill-A-Watt power measuring device, and it seems to draw about 20 watts continuously. It would probably draw more if it were charging its battery.)

      So, when these airport or restaurant employees freak out that you're using their power, keep in mind that due to ignorance, they may believe that your laptop is actually using enough energy that it matters. For all I know, they think leaving your laptop plugged in for an hour might use a dollar's worth of energy. (Come to think of it, it would be an interesting little project to visit several restaurants and take a survey of employees, asking them to estimate how many dollars worth of electricity a laptop uses in an hour.)

  34. You don't need to tell me twice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have a problem with me charging my laptop up while I'm purchasing services in your place of business, just let me know and I'll be sure to find somewhere that doesn't. That simple, really.

  35. Yeah. by torpor · · Score: 1


    Its a case of pot-kettle-black, anyway.

    Starbucks are the damned leaches, remember that, distant-caffeine-fogged memories of the 90's notwithstanding!!

    Bloody rude, if you ask me, anyway, not letting a customer 'power up' if they need to, while using so-called 'free WLAN services' while enjoying raped-the-earth-coffee ..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Yeah. by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I dislike Starbucks just as much as you but as far as I remember all their coffee is shade-grown.

      --
      -mkb
    2. Re:Yeah. by torpor · · Score: 1

      ermm... yeah. they're still an evil empire hell-bent on eradicating mom-'n-pop coffeeshops from the face of the earth, duh.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    3. Re:Yeah. by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing that, but that's not exactly rape-the-earth, is it?

      --
      -mkb
    4. Re:Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop violently agreeing and admit that only one person can have the last word in a conversation. ;-)

    5. Re:Yeah. by torpor · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing that, but that's not exactly rape-the-earth, is it?

      far as i'm concerned, it is. i mean, i saw them move into a neighborhood i used to live in, in los angeles, and absolutely *demolish* the budding coffeeshop culture that was going on in that 'hood, by franchising *3* starbucks locations within 2 blocks of each other.

      that was just sick. sorry, but rampant consumericanism sucks ass.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    6. Re:Yeah. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      So, rather than blaming the patrons who abandoned your beloved coffeeshops, you blame Starbucks? Consider, maybe no one else gave a crap about this "coffeeshop culture" you speak of and really just wanted a cheap cup of coffee.

    7. Re:Yeah. by torpor · · Score: 1

      If they (in your hypothetical little reality) really wanted a cheap cuppa, they would've stayed at the mom-'n-pop stores.

      but no, being the consumerican sheep that they were, unable to stifle the urge to follow their favourite Seinfeld/Friends characters lives down the drain, of course they went for the 'shiny' option.

      bah! who cares, at least the europeans have sense enough to not get all psycho-hippy-dippy about the starbucks invasion .. ignore them, and they will go away. good riddance, caffeine-borg!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    8. Re:Yeah. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Crap, make up your mind. Before, it was Starbuck's fault, and now it's the sheeple. You really need to get your story straight. Then again, I suppose it's easier to rail against the evil Starbucks than it is to face the fact that not everyone values those precious coffeeshops as much as you.

    9. Re:Yeah. by torpor · · Score: 1

      Crap, make up your mind.

      "'Crap, clean up your room!'"

      Before, it was Starbuck's fault,

      No, its always Starbucks fault. Starbucks, Starbucks, Starbucks.

      There, I said it. .. and now it's the sheeple.

      No, its always the sheeple, too. Sheeple Too, Sheeple Too, Sheeple Too!

      You're one of them, for instance! Stop drinking consumerican drugs!

      You really need to get your story straight.

      Sigh, but that I were telling a story, its true .. there were really cool coffeeshops on that block before 3 Starbucks came along, and everyone 'sorta got over coffeeshops'...

      Then again, I suppose it's easier to rail against the evil Starbucks than it is to face the fact that not everyone values those precious coffeeshops as much as you.


      Oh, but then that must be what makes me special, natürlich!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  36. Re:When are you guys going to go to grade school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep! "needs" is right. Bad pedant, needs to go back to pedant school (or is that "need"?).

  37. Two things. by Blapto · · Score: 2, Informative

    1) www.bugmenot.com It has a firefox plug in, you right click the username field, click bugmenot, and it logs you in, no registration required. 2) I'm guilty, so what? I like to go to a coffee place (a cheap, friendly one nearby) and work for 3-4 hours. It's a productive environment. I reckon I drink a coffee every 30 minutes while I'm working, so I probably have about 6 in 4 hours. Call it £3/coffee, that's £18. Call it 6p/kWh, my laptop drinks 65W, so that's about 2p worth of energy. It's a bit of a fuss about nothing. Quote: "Somebody's got to pay for that electricity." Yes, the customer. They might say "if everybody came in and did it..." well, for 12 hours, there are 10 people drawing 100W, that's 12kWh, that's about 70p for the day. Boohoo. BTW, guys who can't find power outlets, use my Confucius say style motto... Think like the cleaner.

    1. Re:Two things. by kjamez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i'd say (without RingTFA) that a lot of the concern is just that you do sit there and drink only 2 coffee's in a hour. at 3 pounds/euros/dollars, it's not that same as if it was a bottomless cup of drip brew for 1 euro/dollar/pound. you are taking up a whole seat, but probably actually taking up a whole booth with your papers and laptop ... a booth that could better accomodate 3 people each buying 3 euro coffee's and only planning on staying for their cigarette, and going back to their workplace.

      i have a hard time believing that shops are concerned with the minimal ammounts of power cellphones and laptop requires, but when you camp out with them waiting for your device to power up fully, you are costing them 'geniune' revenue (unless you are producing it for them, by having a meal over that span of your two hours).

      personally, not being able to smoke in coffee shops (most, in america i've found, especially the west [i call it the 'left'] coast) prevents me from spending any real ammount of time in them (20 minutes for two coffee's, and probably only one to go) ...

      it's the same reason mcdonald's chairs are so uncomfortable: they don't want you there. not just you (the geek with the laptop), anyone. they want you to drive through, or eat and get the hell out, cause more people could be sitting there ...

      It's a bit of a fuss about nothing. Quote: "Somebody's got to pay for that electricity." Yes, the customer. They might say "if everybody came in and did it..." well, for 12 hours, there are 10 people drawing 100W, that's 12kWh, that's about 70p for the day. Boohoo.

      again, not about the electricity: and 40 pounds/hr lost to the booth(s) lost by people camping and treating a restaurant as a workplace.

      now i fully appreciate all the wifi spots about, and places like that are fully EXPECTING people to stay put for a few hours (hourly wifi access), but shops with less than 15 chairs are not making a fortune (or possibly even survivng) by having you work in a corner all afternoon.

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    2. Re:Two things. by troon · · Score: 1

      I like to go to a coffee place (a cheap, friendly one nearby) ... Call it £3/coffee

      I'm learning a new definition of "cheap" here.

      I reckon I drink a coffee every 30 minutes while I'm working, so I probably have about 6 in 4 hours.

      I don't know about you, but my work would be suffering after 6 coffees!

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    3. Re:Two things. by iainl · · Score: 1

      "Think like the cleaner"

      What, you mean "No women, no kids?"

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    4. Re:Two things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the bugmenot link, I haven't seen this before and I refuse to signup to read a story :)

      Thanks.

    5. Re:Two things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the joy of a perfect movie quote delivered with such style.

      Mod parent up please, this was hilarious :)

  38. Re:When are you guys going to go to grade school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll translate it for you as I read it:

    "Many users, despite needing to recharge the battery of a device, are aware that electricity costs businesses money, and so ask for permission before plugging into an outlet, and perhaps offer a token payment in addition to whatever goods they were planning on buying."

    I took it as a good thing, an expression of basic politeness - an indication that not all people are selfish, even with regards to something as relatively minor as taking a small amount of electricity.

  39. We only let paying customer charge up ... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1
    How much power does a laptop draw, it's not like it's a hair dryer or something like that.

    I've never seen any coffee shop or bar complain about this behaviour, it costs pennies to charge a laptop and it's a rounding error on a typical bar's power bill to charge a cell phone.

    It's like using the bathroom or taking more paper napkins; it's part of the business and only idiots would even blink at a customer taking this kind of liberty.

    1. Re:We only let paying customer charge up ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure my assumption is correct.

      Assume
      a notebook uses 20 watt
      5 people is changing the notebook
      10 hours a day during the business
      30 days a month

      we are using 20x5x10x30 = 30000 wattshour = 30kwh
      average cost of electricity is about 10-15 cents per kwh

      So, we are talking about $3-$5 dollars per month.

  40. Biggest cost to a business will be... by shoppa · · Score: 1, Redundant
    The biggest cost to a business will be when someone trips over your charger's power cord. The guy who tripped sues the store for the hazard they allowed on the floor, and you sue the store for a new laptop.

    Sure, the store's insurance will cover it, but then they'll get their rates jacked up and probably a clause in the next policy specifically prohibiting customers from plugging in anywhere.

    If they put power jacks and tables in good areas, where nobody can trip, this becomes a non-issue...

    1. Re:Biggest cost to a business will be... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      The biggest cost to a business will be when someone trips over your charger's power cord. The guy who tripped sues the store for the hazard they allowed on the floor, and you sue the store for a new laptop.

      Are you kidding me? That would actually work?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    2. Re:Biggest cost to a business will be... by shoppa · · Score: 1

      For a bumped head or broken arm, the insurance company will pay out nearly automatically for hospital bills. (They will contest additional costs, lost wages, emotional distress, etc. most of the time.) For the laptop thrown to the floor, it's not so clear, but there will be legal costs if the owner decides to sue about it in any event.

    3. Re:Biggest cost to a business will be... by kjamez · · Score: 1

      only in america.

      [patiently waiting my twenty seconds]

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    4. Re:Biggest cost to a business will be... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      I truly can't believe it. How is it the responsibility of the business that individual x had his chord hanging there? thank god i live in a country where you're insured for medical expenses anyway(obligatorily by law) and terminal stupidity is not considered an asset...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    5. Re:Biggest cost to a business will be... by shoppa · · Score: 1
      "Deep pockets". If anything happens on a property-owner/leaser's premises, their insurance will probably end up at least defending the lawsuit.

      Overall, it's not a bad principle. It means the prorietor has an interest in keeping his customers safe. If it means that he bans dangling power cords, well, that's tough luck for those who want to plug in laptops.

  41. Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who yelled in the office "plug it UP YOUR ASS !" ?

  42. Re:WEP ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I make my wireless network unavailable to leeches, then the leeches presumably wouldn't have a reason to use their craptops, and thus wouldn't plug them into my power jacks. Think of all the cents I would save on my electric bill every month!

    Of course that's ridiculous because people did have a use for computers before the Internet -- didn't they?

    aQazaQa

  43. power leeching by ajs318 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm not sure I'd use other people's power sockets without first applying my trusty AVO, maybe even an oscilloscope to check the frequency and waveshape; and even then, I'd always insist on using a well-filtered and surge-protected extension lead. Because I know exactly what I would do if I was the proprietor of a catering establishment where people were even half-likely to leech my power! In the olden days, when it used to be common for equipment to be housed in metal cases, I would just have swapped the phase and earth contacts in the customer area sockets. But today, I'd hafta settle for installing something like a Schaffner 2050 transient generator upstream of the wall sockets in the customer area, and cranking it up to its most extreme setting. Oh, yes, and I'd get another Schaffner and couple its outputs to a bunch of innocuous-looking RJ45s.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:power leeching by BrK · · Score: 1

      And you'd be in the restraunt business for about 2 days.

      Power costs, on average, 12 cents per KwH. The cost of someone plugging in a laptop to charge for an hour is far less than the cost of the paper cup the coffee they bought was served in.

      Your talk about using a filtered/protected extention lead is also silly. Most devices these days have power supplys that can work happily on anything from 90-260VAC. They take in AC, and output DC, and thus have a degree of filtering built in already. Furthermore laptop power bricks and such are pretty much desgined to be used in all sorts of environments. I'd worry more about the contaminantes in the water they used to make my Latte than I would worry about a bit of noise or ripple on the AC.

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    2. Re:power leeching by pklong · · Score: 1

      Dangerous practices. I don't know about the states but swapping earth / live would probably get you procescuted for manslaughter in the UK. The transient generator would probably get you sued for damages.

      I am no expert but under the new legislation that has just been introduced you would be in trouble for not being a "competant person" and possibly for not complying with the new building regulations (requiring permission before installing new circuits etc.)

      The outlets would certainly not pass the periodic electrical testing that businesses must do.

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    3. Re:power leeching by Mongo222 · · Score: 1

      Really, you'd do that? You'd spend thousands of dollars in time and equipment to save less than a hundred a year in power costs and piss off your customers in the process?

    4. Re:power leeching by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      The letters "B.Eng" after my name would rather suggest I am competent, although the onus would be on the snooping busybody to demonstrate that the work had in fact taken place since the building regulations changed rather than before as I would naturally claim in my defence. Furthermore, a customer who attempted to leach my power would be committing simple trespass -- a civil offence -- by the simple act of inserting a plug into one of my sockets, and theft of electricity -- a criminal offence -- from the instant they flicked the switch {note for readers in less civilised countries: wall sockets in the UK are all 3-pin, safety shuttered and individually switched}. No different really than a door that's not for public use, with nothing behind it -- not even a floor.

      As to whether it's more effort than it's worth, that's a good question -- and it depends on a number of factors, including what Kirsty Gallagher will pay for vids of mobiles exploding and laptops going on fire! {BTW, I'd charge my customers for using the extinguisher, too, if it ever came down to that. They don't recharge themselves after every use, you know.}

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    5. Re:power leeching by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      All I need to say to this is: trespass does *not* alleviate your responsibility not to leave unmarked active hazards on your property.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    6. Re:power leeching by jlehtira · · Score: 1

      A customer inserting his plug to your socket would be trespassing? I cannot imagine this being any more true than a customer placing his foot on your floor, or using your toilet. Both things cost for the restaurant owner, and I've never seen either being explicitly allowed. Are you saying I should stop using restaurant toilets (without asking) to avoid getting sued?

      Be what may, setting up traps is illegal in civilized places. Why not simply cover your sockets with "You want my power? Sod off!" - signs?

    7. Re:power leeching by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing this degree of yours didn't come from a university that made you take marketing courses. The university I'm attending, however, does. Let me assure you that intentionally antagonizing your customers doesn't encourage repeat business.

      A key differentiator is to offer a service that your competitor does not - "frying customers' mobile devices" is probably not what my professors were talking about. On the other hand, the coffee shop down the street from yours will get all your former customers who just want a latte and a few minutes of electricity, and without that "burnt computer smell" likely to characterize your establishment.

    8. Re:power leeching by Twanfox · · Score: 1
      Why not simply cover your sockets with "You want my power? Sod off!" - signs?

      Wait, wait, I know this one! Umm... because the grandparent poster is a bitter ol' bastard that feels that, instead of doing a more logical and proper thing such as not installing sockets or installing sockets with locked covers in public areas, it is proper, right, justified, and legal to destroy the equipment that a customer wishes to use while frequenting his establishment.

      Let's not let logic, business ethics, legality, or common sense actually enter into the picture. That just clouds things. I, as a business owner, would certainly want the customer to stand at the door, throw money into the pot, and walk away. For added profit, I won't even provide any services or benefits.

      Step 1. Deny customers perks
      Step 2. ???
      Step 3. Profit!

      It could work!

    9. Re:power leeching by dajak · · Score: 1

      and theft of electricity -- a criminal offence -- from the instant they flicked the switch

      A taking of some good is only theft if it is clearly contrary to custom or law. That is why many businesses have 'private' signs on doors. I think in this case you would have to tell customers first it is not allowed, or add a 'private' sign to the outlets.

      No different really than a door that's not for public use, with nothing behind it -- not even a floor.

      This kind of arrangement is also prohibited in a workplace. There is wellknown international case law about it (about an engine room in a ship with steel ladders etc. but no nearby floor).

      {BTW, I'd charge my customers for using the extinguisher, too, if it ever came down to that. They don't recharge themselves after every use, you know.}

      Since you don't care for my equipment, I don't care for your restaurant. I would not feel a need to extinguish the fire, I think. You started it, after all.

    10. Re:power leeching by hughk · · Score: 1
      Actually the UK problem is the HSE. They really don't like cables stretched across any gangway and responsible employees may be held accountable. Unless the power socket is right by the table, connection is really a no-no.

      OTOH, I know a nice wine bar in the city of London that makes its prics somewhat more user freindly by providing free WiFi and power.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  44. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by Shisha · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think there is another important issue: safety. If your device short circuits the airport power network and then it takes 20 minutes before someone finds the circuit breaker then people are not going to be happy. And what if your device screws up someones laptop? (I know this is _really_ unlikely) The UK solution is that all electrical devices plugged in any sort of public socket (e.g. libraries) should be tested for safety, whenever they're more than one year old.

    I'd imagine that airports have two or three different level of electricity grid one for the "totally essential" and one for all the shops adverts and Christmas trees.

    As for the electricity bill: if I'm at the airport and everything is running on time then batteries in my laptop last long enough. If my flight gets delayed by 7 hours like it did the last time then I feel I have the right to use some electricity, for all the airport taxes I have paid. Even if that means unplugging some Christmas tree.

    And if any employee of the airport wants to come and argue about this then he's welcome: I have 7 hours to spare and I'm pretty annoyed to begin with.

  45. more like mosquitoing power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    $hit on a $tick!
    Someones laptop, even if a 100W power hungry Alaskan mosquito is gonna use what? At 14 cents/kWh, 2 hours is only 2.8 cents. I've seen fat business guys at the airport drop a couple of bucks in change when they struggle toward an erect posture after sitting with their laptop. At this point they are too stiff to bend over and pick up their change.

    You want leeches?
    Atlanta airport concessionaire contracts as political payoff and nepotism. Handily exempt from 'living wage' requirements of city businesses. Now that's leeching on a scale that puts the world total portable device mosquitoes in 'drop in a bucket' perspective. Besides, why the hell would a business offer free WiFi for customers and then worry about a buck or two a day, max, in power nibbling?

  46. Coffee shops by raider_red · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll plug in at coffee shops from time to time if my laptop's battery is starting to go dead. I've always considered buying coffee there to be a form of rent fo rthe table space I'm using. Power is just an extension of that.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    1. Re:Coffee shops by kjamez · · Score: 1

      hell i don't even use a store's bathroom without buying coffee or something. i almost wet myself in line once waiting for an old lady to buy her coffee with a check. why do people still use checks? now, in the event of an emergancy, i piss first and purchase later.

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
    2. Re:Coffee shops by legojenn · · Score: 1
      [I] almost wet myself in line once waiting for an old lady to buy her coffee with a check. why do people still use checks?

      I am guessing that you are in the US because of the spelling of cheque. Anyhow, I cannot figure out the excessive use of checks/cheques in the US. Considering that there are so many small banks there and the fact that they are incredibly inefficent methods of transferring money, I am surprised that the US wasn't the first developed country to do away with them for most personal transactions. Apart from payment for rent, utilities, charge & credit cards and for large purchases like a car, it seems that no-one up here is even willing to accept a cheque, even utilities are encouraging the use of credit cards and pre-authorised debits for bills. We end up using our ATM card for anything that used to be purchased by cheque. It's so much simpler.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
  47. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by ColaMan · · Score: 1

    "Normally" you have a meter that gives you the total kW/hr reading, metered at some discount rate.
    You then also have a "surge" meter that reads peak usage, or usage above a stated kW/hr.
    This is normally used in industrial estates to (help) discourage Big Power Users from switching everything on at once. This way the electrical company can use equipment with a lower surge capacity.

    This used to be a real problem at a lab I used to work at, as they had a number of large (20kW) sample drying ovens. Coupled with the "small" (5kW) furnaces we had in the lab + A/C + freezer storage etc, it was quite easy for all the switched loads to "sync up" and .... ooops! $4,000 for a single 5 second 200kW peak surge this month.
    There was a power meter gadget on the main incomer with a serial interface left from the previous tenants, and after much cursing in Perl, I eventally linked it to the server in the lab to turn on a light when we were nearing our "peak meter threshold" (100kW). The lab staff would then hold off putting new samples on, or would switch off a few idle furnaces.
    As the average lab load was about 75kW, this saved us many thousands over a year.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  48. One Word by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

    Fuelcell

    1. Re:One Word by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      Yeah but there not really in the main stream yet.. and as far as I remeber you can't take them onto planes, they may go kaboom!

      --
      moo
    2. Re:One Word by odyrithm · · Score: 1

      oh and fuelcell is two words.. Fuel cell.

      --
      moo
  49. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by ichthius · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's because you're paying for a capacity to be made available for you as well as the power itself.

    As a simple example, suppose your peak power consumption is the same as the peak output of the local power-station.

    Given that you could want 100% of the power plant output at any one time, the power ocompany has to effectively reserve it for you. Even if you just want 1% of it, it can't sell the other 99% because you might need it.

    DISCLAIMER - yes I do work in the electricity industry.

  50. VCS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently got stuck in London Victoria Station, with my battery dead.
    Of course, I brought my phone's charger. Little did I know that those silly brits used *square* power wall plugs instead of the European standard.
    Thankfully, it's 230v. So I whopped out my thrusty leatherman, unscrewed a wallsocket in the toilets, removed the wires, and taped them to my charger. I was saved =).

    1. Re:VCS by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 1

      Little did I know that those silly brits used *square* power wall plugs instead of the European standard.

      A little forward planning goes a long way ;-)

      So I whopped out my thrusty leatherman, unscrewed a wallsocket in the toilets, removed the wires, and taped them to my charger. I was saved

      And lucky not to be electrocuted - all for the sake of a converter plug, generally available for a couple of pounds which you can use anywhere in the UK!

      A few pounds vs (repeated?) risk of loss of life ? - interesting priorities !!

  51. I'm a bit surprised... by Fencepost · · Score: 1

    That none of the online hotspot directories include a rating for each hotspot to show availability of outlets. Range: "none," "1-4," "5-10," "10+," and "Almost every table."

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  52. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by Bishop · · Score: 1

    In North America the billing model depends on the power requirements of the company. Smaller companies are metered just like homes. Even rather large companies can be metered.

  53. Moons Over My Hammy and a movie.... by Mork29 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My friends and I would specifically go to Denny's instead of the IHOP across the street, because they had a booth with an outlet. We would plug in and watch movies while we ate and hung out. It was 3am so nobody minded us hogging a booth, and the manager would come and sit with us and watch the movie when it was slow enough or the movie was good enough. We cost them $.50 in electricity and made them much more than that in business. I don't feal guilty for it....and the manager never minded....

    1. Re:Moons Over My Hammy and a movie.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious, how many bowls did you smoke before going to Denny's on an average night?

    2. Re:Moons Over My Hammy and a movie.... by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 4, Informative
      You didn't cost them $0.5. They spent more on the water you used going to the toilet two or three times. If they had hand driers, that electricity cost them more than your laptop did.

      They used more energy brewing your coffee refill than your laptop did. (Note to Starbucks victims---normal restaurants often provide "bottomless" cups of coffee for the price of a single cup, typically less than a dollar and a half).

      If it was winter when you did this, you cost them more energy by opening the door to walk into the restaurant in the first place. Then again, you're providing them with 0.1kW of heat just by existing, so maybe you should be charging them.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    3. Re:Moons Over My Hammy and a movie.... by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      Same here. IHOP wouldn't let us plug in a laptop, Denny's did. Denny's now gets my business whenever I'm wandering about with a laptop looking for something to eat.

      I hope the fraction of a cent IHOP saved was worth it to them.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    4. Re:Moons Over My Hammy and a movie.... by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      (Note to Starbucks victims---normal restaurants often provide "bottomless" cups of coffee for the price of a single cup, typically less than a dollar and a half).

      You call that coffee? "normal restaurants" tend to provide weakly-brewed generic-brand coffee that is low on caffiene and weak on flavor. I'm not saying Starbucks is a shining example of the world's best coffee, but I'll take it any day over what you get in a Denny's, IHOP, Shari's (for my fellow Pacific Northwesterners), or any other "normal restaurant."

      Personally, I prefer Dutch Bros. coffee on the road, and I do the Starbucks thing when I need a place to sit. Having an outlet for the laptop is a big bonus. Quite often I'll try a local coffee place in an area I visit, but they tend to be less computer-friendly.

      The best coffee is brewed at home from freshly ground beans. It should be opaque and have a definite oil slick visible on top (from the bean oils, not from pollution of your coffee making supplies), but not too strong or overdone.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  54. True... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    The biggest power hog on laptops now is that florescent backlight. Eliminate that and I'm certain you could get twice as much battery time with current tech.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:True... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      I thought the biggest hog was the processor? My laptop eats ~80 watts (1.1ghz celeron) and I am pretty sure at least 50% consumption is the processor.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  55. Nokia chargers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nokia is using a standard charger for all models that has not been changed since the mid 90s. With the (past) marketshare of Nokia this means you are never far from a charger, at a friends, at work, with a customer or around town. I travel a lot without bringing a charger (+adapter) for my Nokia without a problem. Genious.

    1. Re:Nokia chargers by klang · · Score: 1

      now THAT's power leeching!

    2. Re:Nokia chargers by macTijn · · Score: 1

      this is *not* true. While the old models used the (heavier) slow charger, some newer models have a quick charger. The latter type can NOT be used on the NI-MH batteries. they will ruin the battery's lifetime.

      I experienced this myself, back in the days when I had my 5130.

    3. Re:Nokia chargers by clanrat · · Score: 1

      uh, all of the phone-and-battery-specific charging circuitry is in the phone ... the adapter is just supplying power. They're ALL THE SAME.

    4. Re:Nokia chargers by macTijn · · Score: 1

      Well, then take a look at this. This is the US version of the rapid charger sold with some nokia's here in Europe. You can see, there is no phone that originally came with a NI-MH battery listed in the compatibility list. The 5110 had a NI-MH battery.

      The totally universal slowcharger is to be found here . Now, I know there's no 5110 listed here, but I think that's because the 5110 wasn't sold in the US. Since the links are for the US-only online store, the phone wouldn't be listed.

  56. Re:When are you guys going to go to grade school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In capitalist USA, The schooling needs YOU.

    Uh, whatever.

  57. Wireless Power by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    That would solve this 'issue'.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Wireless Power by kjamez · · Score: 1

      or perhaps a way to plug it into your self, using your own natural bio-electric currents. the longer you are online, the less actualy energy YOU have. that would solve the 'leaching' issue, but gets into serious health implications.

      --
      you can't have everything, where would you put it?
  58. LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is it going to take to get /. editors from using links in stories that actually LINK TO the article/story they are referring to, instead of ones that prompt for some stupid login.

    If it requires a login, its a private site, and isnt public news. If its public news, the same story *WILL* be posted on a public site that doesnt waste peoples time with login nonsense. It would take an editor posting a story 15 seconds to hit google news, and find such a link for a story, to substitute for where a story submitter has included a link to such a private news site. Instead of each view having to either do that or waste time either maintining a login or making up a disposable one for every story.

    WHY IS SLASHDOT SUPPORTING THE NEW YORK TIMES OBNOXIOUS, PRIVACY-INVADING, AND GENERAL PAIN IN THE ASS REGISTRATION POLICY? How much are they paying, and to who?

    If this is going to continue, it would be damn nice if instead of the (intermittent) '(free reg required)' comment on these stories, that fact was stored in a boolean field in the story database, so that viewers could have a prefs option to choose to just have those stories completely supressed from their slashdot experience.

    And if enough people set that pref, perhaps the eds will finally realize that posting stories with that type of link is a complete waste of time.

    1. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by FlyGirl · · Score: 1



      What more can I say?

    2. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Its called bugmenot and if you had done your homework you would know that its also availiable as a Firefox extension meaning passing through NY Times security will take you about 1 second.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by Squall2131 · · Score: 1

      Fuck yea! I agree whole heartily i really don't care about reading news from a site that makes you register only to be put on numerous mailing lists... I want unbias news and don't trust a site that will make you login to access it.

    4. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I just tried Bugmenot and the after the first 5 invalid accounts that it gave me, I gave up. What a worthless site....

    5. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Funny, worked first time for me.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    6. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bugmenot would work great....if the Surfcontrol software at work didn't friggin' block access to their site!

    7. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      ah thats a bitch. ask your admin to also block slashdot - problem solved..

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    8. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by recursiv · · Score: 1

      Lucky you. I have never had bmn work on nyt, even after dozens of attempts.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    9. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Fuck yea! I agree whole heartily i really don't care about reading news from a site that makes you register only to be put on numerous mailing lists...

      I have been a registered New York Times web site user for about 5 years, with a unique email address created specifically for that purpose, and that address has never once received a piece of mail (except for the registration confirmation 5 years ago).

      I want unbias news and don't trust a site that will make you login to access it.

      What on earth is the connection between editorial bias, and requiring registration to visit a web site? Either you're wholly irrational or you have an enviable gift for sarcasm.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    10. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by Squall2131 · · Score: 1

      uh... i'm gonna go with the sarcasm... my (unstated) point was that its not public news. Hence its not slashdot. Slashdot is free public news where anyone, anywhere can post their opinion and facts. Sometimes an article can be completely wrong but the people who read it can post facts they've found or their opinions. This can make an article that was false, correct, Just by reading what people think, or believe. With a private server like New York Times what they give you is what you get. ( i don't know if they have a posting system like on slashdot because i'm not registered. But since its private not as many people will be posting and its a smaller pool of information)

    11. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Just tried again - I was going to post a logon but now i find its not working for me either! I read the article fine but now 5 different logons have failed. Its a bitch, they probably do a daily purge of suspect accounts.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    12. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Slashdot is free public news where anyone, anywhere can post their opinion and facts. Sometimes an article can be completely wrong but the people who read it can post facts they've found or their opinions. This can make an article that was false, correct

      Ok, fair point. I guess there are two different kinds of trust at play. With the New York Times you are trusting the institution's concern for its own reputation to incentivize accuracy. With Slashdot, you are trusting posters' addiction to the glory of pointing out someone's mistake to incentivize an iterative sort of accuracy. They both work, sometimes. But how to figure out which times are which?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    13. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by Squall2131 · · Score: 1

      lol glad we understand each other, i don't want to seem like an asshole.

    14. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Fine, add to the list 'dont want to waste my time installing and then keeping updated a special purpose applet specifically to have to avoid doing any of the previous'. But to be honest, I'd prefer just setting a pref here that would just suppress them entirely.

      Really, it would take only a few seconds for the ed to find a link that works like the web is supposed to on google news, instead of being a whore for the NYT.

    15. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Ah what can I say? bugmenot usually works great :\ Everyones always been going on that Slashdot should have some sort of distributed mirror system (to save slashdotting sites) which would also solve this, and every year someone says "look, heres a nice mirroring system" and it never gets used...

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  59. Airports and charging by sczimme · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I have to admit that I do this all the time, especially in airports-- and it is getting harder and harder to find places to recharge.

    That's strange: the only place where I can consistently find a free* outlet is in the airport. I have on occasion carried a small outlet strip in my bag just in case all the outlets are taken, but this has not been an issue. (Someone using a laptop probably wouldn't mind unplugging for a few seconds while you plugged in the strip (so you could share the outlet), unless he was a complete turlingdrome.)

    I also fly on newer Airbus aircraft whenever possible. The 300 series have DC power outlets in the armrests of all the seats (yes, even in coach/steerage). If I know I'm going to be on such a flight for an hour or more, I won't bother looking for an AC outlet in the terminal. I picked up one of these for use on the road. (The auto-DC-to-airline-DC adapter is the C-chaped item at the bottom of the picture.) Airline DC outlets are standardized (I forget the name of the connector) so any vendor's adapter should work.

    * "free" as in "no people". In this context, I suppose "free as in beer" would also apply.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Airports and charging by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      (Someone using a laptop probably wouldn't mind unplugging for a few seconds while you plugged in the strip (so you could share the outlet), unless he was a complete turlingdrome.)

      FYI...ask before doing this. Some idiot did that to me and my battery is fried. He unplugged while I was saving my expense report. If he had asked I could have told him and the 2nd outlet was another guy who had a battery.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    2. Re:Airports and charging by hughk · · Score: 1

      You fly without a good battery? I had to replace my battery before flying because of security checks. Yes, they can test it without me switching on but then it takes extra minutes to use the sniffer.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    3. Re:Airports and charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh!!! so all the sudden republicans give a SHIT about the kurds?!@?!?!

      aren't you all the dumb fucks (Bush the Senior, during Iraq War I) who encouraged a Kurdish uprising then let them hang out to dry???? How many of those 250k were slaughtered after the first Gulf War when the US pulled out after assuring "support"? You tried to get peasant Kurds trying to do your dirty work (overthrowing saddam) then TOTALLY fscked them over!!!!

      you asshat. why don't you fucking READ HISTORY! THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR YOUR IGNORANCE.

      thanks,

      ~PopCulture

    4. Re:Airports and charging by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I do read history and I never made claims that you put in my mouth. History says he killed 250K of them. Democrats claim its all about the oil. What did Clinton do while this was going on? Nothing. He left them hanging out to dry and die.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    5. Re:Airports and charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AAAG!

      the first Bush did the SAME THING. After Gulf War I, he left the Kurds to revolt alone and die. Clinton simply continued the actions of his predecessor, Bush Sr. and the no-fly zones! Why are you blaming that policy on clinton and democrats? it makes no sence.

      I cannot speak for all democrats, but I don't believe it was all about the oil. I just want a straight answer as to why we are at war. no wmd's, no al-quida link, no threat to us.

      and again, if you look back in recent history, there have been much more brutal regimes involving many many more deaths over the same time periods. Why Iraq? Why this?

      its all so fucking tragic.

      for an interesting read, please check out Bush's father's reasoning behind not invading Iraq during Gulf War I. Very intelligent, Bush Sr. was many times greater a statesman than the joke we have in office today:

      http://www.thememoryhole.org/mil/bushsr-iraq.htm

      ~PopCulture

    6. Re:Airports and charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd also like to apologize for my bad fucking language and caps. Not an appropriate forum for this debate, but your response to my offtopic rant was levelheaded and intelligent though I disagree completely.

      respect,

      PC

  60. Schools? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know at the "School of Advanced Technology" college I went to they had zero [yup count them zero] places to sit down and use a laptop. We had to make due sitting in the cafe and steal from the wall outlets [of which there were a half dozen for a school of 14,000 people].

    Just wondering, anyone else goto tech schools like that?

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Schools? by akeyes · · Score: 0

      At my school (PA College of Technology), in the Computer Science area, every table has one outlet per chair. (And with people skipping or not needing an outlet, you could easily use 2 or more.)

  61. We breathe their air too. Somebody call a cop. by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Please, this is just a bunch of psycholibertarians furious that they can't put a coin slot on your very soul. Any 'vendor' who objects to me using their outlets which are out in the open needs to find a new customer to replace me.

  62. Plug sharing ettiquette by ptomblin · · Score: 1

    I've been the "hero of the day" at Starbucks a few times when I'm on the road because I carry a power strip in my laptop bag. I'll plug in my power strip, and then invite anybody nearby who wants to plug in.

    I have a picture on my web site of one night in a hotel room where between my wife and I we had plugged in two laptops, two PDAs, two cell phones, two digital camera battery chargers, a video camera, and an iPod.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:Plug sharing ettiquette by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you had lunch with Saddam Hussein? http://xcski.com/gallery/raw/CW5H0767

      (Sorry, couldn't resist, I'm bored out of my skull here at work today.)

  63. Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by Mazrim_Ta · · Score: 5, Informative

    I own Node Coffee Shop in Milwaukee, WI (open 24 hours). When I built the cafe I had the electrician put in quad outlets every 6-8 feet around the shop so that customers would never have to fight over a power outlet. Every seat has an outlet. No other cafe in the area can boast that kind of setup. I dont believe it costs us very much more as far as operating expenses go, but it does increase our profits as we get a lot of customers who come to our establishment because we have such great access. Check us out if you are ever in the Milwaukee area! http://www.nodecoffee.com/

    1. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ill have to go check it out sometime, looks like a really nifty place where g33ks hang out! I wish more cafes would put that kind of thought into being technology friendly. As it is, when I go to other coffee shops around town, I get stares from people when I plug my laptop in...as if I'm doing something wrong. People around here just dont get it....but it looks like this place Node does!

    2. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      When I was working at the local Starbucks, we were trying to figure out the best way to arrange the furniture in the cozy little nook with the fireplace. Every time I suggested something that would work great, the manager would say 'Yeah, that would be great, except it's blocking the outlets.'

      It was not entirely unusual to see three or four people with laptops there. Some would plug in, some wouldn't, but any were welcome to if they were sitting near an outlet.

    3. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by windex · · Score: 1

      It's too bad you charge for net access -- looks like I'm stuck staying at stone creek when I visit Milwaukee.

      Seriously, I drink 2+ double espresso drinks an hour. Why would I then pay for net access? Stone Creek just uses a dsl line and a linksys router, and its good enough for us sane folks who use TLS and SSL for everything like everyone ought to on a wlan anyway. Why pay for a T1 at Node? 15ms of latency improvement?

    4. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by Mazrim_Ta · · Score: 1

      Node Coffee Shop offeres a free guest login (username: guest, no password). The speed is limited to about 64kb.

      Stone Creek's employees arent trained in technical support, so you are on your own if your laptop cant get on the wifi. Node offers support and highly trained employees who are willing to assist with most computer problems. Node also does its own hosting, offers workstations for rent, customer accounts with roaming profiles, etc... Its a level of service not found at many other cafes around the world...especially non-chain coffee shops. Free doesnt mean good. Paying for wifi/computer access also helps support the business you are frequenting and limits Leechers from becoming a problem...I doubt stone creek (or any business for that matter) would appreciate customers coming in JUST to use the free WIFI and not purchase coffee. (We're also in a residential neighborhood, so about 500 people could get access to our WIFI for free, and that would make the service suck for everybody) http://www.nodecoffee.com/

    5. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Hard for you to measure, but have you been able to compare electricity costs, so as to offer some hard numbers in rebutal to the article?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by bhima · · Score: 1
      Well Said!

      The likelyhood of me spending more that a few days in the US ever again is low and even getting to where you are is approaching zero probability. But I'd pay for the service if I was there.

      In the city I live in it's hard to find a spot without some sort of wireless access for pay. I helped a few of the kids that work at the nearest pizza place with their dimploma thesis so now I get free access, which is not a huge deal because my own wireless works out into the park beyond it. I've only used theirs a couple of times, as it's so close to the house. I have used VOIP to the US on my iPaq at the bar and all the girls there thought it was really cool to talk to someone "all the way to the US for free" more fun than anything else...

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    7. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      Every seat has an outlet. No other cafe in the area can boast that kind of setup. I dont believe it costs us very much more as far as operating expenses go, but it does increase our profits as we get a lot of customers who come to our establishment because we have such great access.

      Thanks! I haven't been there, but I'll stop by if I'm ever out that way.

      I use my laptop at the local coffee shop all the time. I realize it costs *something*, so while I'm there I'll buy a couple cups of coffee and some snacks. Still, the ability to plug in makes me a frequent customer, so I'm more likely to stop there and give them my business even when I'm not jacked in.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    8. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by rabel · · Score: 1

      And for those of us not in the Milwaukee area, watch the interactive Slashdot effect

    9. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Change the first vowel in your coffee shop name and watch the customers roll in!

    10. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      You don't need to measure. You just need a quote from your electric company, the rating from a laptop's power adapter, and a sixth-grader who knows how to do multiplication and long division.

      The number the sixth-grader will finally hand you will, of course, be a gross over-estimate, but it will still come to fractions of a penny per customer.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    11. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by mangee · · Score: 1
      heh, http://www.nodecoffee.com/cgi-bin/awstats.pl
      Day Hits Bandwidth
      05 Jan 2349 27.30 MB
      06 Jan 17487 183.37 MB
      See the webcams? http://www.nodecoffee.com/webcams.html
    12. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by Eol1 · · Score: 1

      You are only part of the market though. Plenty of regulars who sit here all day (or not) for various reasons (some work out of here, some like the atmosphere) who drink a single cup of coffee in 7 hours but happily pay for net access.

      Believe it or not (gasp), some people go to internet cafe's for the connection, not the coffee. Imagine.

      --
      De Oppresso Liber
    13. Re:Node Coffee Shop offers free electricity!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice picture on your site:

      http://www.nodecoffee.com/images/left_top/helpfu ll staff.jpg

      Neat.

      (P.S. If you're having trouble figuring out what I'm talking about, focus on the guy with the white undershirt on.)

  64. Non issue by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok lets see now: My iBook charger outputs 24.5v @ 1.875A. Based on an electricity price of 5.5p per KHW (I plucked that from the first thing I could google) which is pretty high and probably lower for commercial outlets.. anyway i digress.. thats 0.003p per hour. Now lets take an average cup of Starbucks and break it down:

    Price: ~£2.50
    Costs: ~£0.80

    and there for the amount of time I would need to sit there charging my laptop before they started loosing money:

    ~680 hours or about 1 month!

    Obviously that makes some assumptions:
    a) I would only buy one cup off coffee for the whole month and would live off drinking out of the toilet for the rest of the time (an improvement)

    b) They probably wouldnt let me stay overnight

    and

    c) I would actually have to go to Starbucks for more than an hour - the time after which you can no-longer stand its nuvo art fake prints and dirty seats.

    This is so no big deal, its in all these places interests to just let people plug their laptop in for an hour or so, the WiFi and coffee price will more than make up for it.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  65. Re:Note to self... by accelleron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the article:

    Power Users, Ready for a Refill
    By MICHEL MARRIOTT

    MIHOKO HAKATA, a freelance illustrator and recent art-school graduate, ducked into a coffee shop in Midtown Manhattan last week, desperate for a jolt of energy.

    She had work to do. But as she removed her materials from her backpack, it became clear that the energy she was seeking could not be found in a cup. She had a more pressing need: to find a power outlet for her laptop computer, whose battery had died.

    "I realized they have this," said Ms. Hakata, a 29-year-old Tokyo native, as her hand slipped beneath a table to deftly plug her I.B.M. ThinkPad into a wall socket.

    Before Ms. Hakata, who lives on a drafty boat on the Hudson River, could settle into her work, a young man clutching a dying cellphone rushed in.

    "I just have to charge it," he said, asking Ms. Hakata if he could share one of the two power outlets under her table. She smiled politely and nodded.

    Every day, millions of people are finding themselves scurrying about in search of wells of electricity they can tap so their battery-powered mobile devices can remain mobile. Dependence is growing on laptops, cellular telephones, digital music players, digital cameras, camcorders, personal organizers, portable DVD players and the latest hand-held gaming devices - most of which operate on rechargeable lithium-ion batteries - and finding available electrical outlets away from home and office has become more urgent.

    Starbucks and other establishments catering to wired customers appear to do little to discourage or regulate customers who plug in, either to work on AC power or charge up. In large part, the power seekers seem to negotiate their needs among themselves with cooperative grace, following a series of unspoken rules.

    Chief among them, some say, is never to use more than half of the sockets in a wall outlet. If an outlet provides four sockets, electrical etiquette dictates that you can plug in, say, your laptop and your cellphone, but not the iPod, too.

    Those who disregard this courtesy may find themselves the targets of grumblings and harsh stares.

    "It's better not to hog all the outlets, of course," said Zyphus Lebrun, a graduate student in journalism at Columbia University. "It's like when you go to the Laundromat and there is one person using four dryers."

    While some devices, like a dying cellphone, require only a few minutes of charging to regain short-term use, most devices, like laptops, take much longer. It is not uncommon for users of electronics with more ravenous appetites to camp out for hours near an electrical outlet. In some cases, those staking a claim do so by plugging in a device - even a $2,000 laptop - only to leave it unattended while fetching a $4 coffee.

    Much of the mounting quest for power stems, some hardware manufacturers say, from battery performance that has generally not kept up with the rapidly expanding capabilities of today's consumer electronics.

    In turn, some battery makers blame hardware makers for adding power-consuming extras like larger, brighter display screens on laptops and bigger hard drives in digital music players. The result is devices that can operate for little more than four to six hours between charges.

    As a consequence, knowing the location of a well-placed (and unused) electrical outlet may be considered more vital than knowing the closest public bathroom.

    "It has become part of your lifestyle," Ralph Bond, the consumer education officer for Intel, said of the continual challenge of taking advantage of the widening offerings of digital electronics but not becoming a slave to the socket. "I can give you a guided tour of the two concourses for United Airlines in Chicago O'Hare." He then rattled off a long list of airports where he knows the whereabouts of obscure but accessible electrical outlets. "I can show you where the very valued and highly prized electrical outlets are for frequent travelers that need to jui

    --
    Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
  66. A different view by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Much of the mounting quest for power stems, some hardware manufacturers say, from battery performance that has generally not kept up with the rapidly expanding capabilities of today's consumer electronics.

    Or alternativily you could argue that todays consumer electronics haven't designed their products well enough to take into account the clearly known limitations of current battery technology (it's not like the mainstream market has changed very much recently). Sure they've made efforts, but the direction has been (until recently) on bigger, better, faster and more powerful rather than lower heat output and reduced power consumption.

    Or you could blame product managers and consumers. One for actually considering that a product with a 3 hour battery life is marketable and the other for actually proving them right.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  67. Turnabout is fair play... by PNutts · · Score: 0

    For everyone who thinks this is OK, how about putting an extension cord out your window and publishing your address. My wife and I have a few things we need to recharge... ;)

    Also, if it isn't too much bother, disable WEP on your WiFi.

    1. Re:Turnabout is fair play... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I didn't invite you into my home. If I had, I'd be a bit of a jerk to say "No, you can't use my power outlets."

      Can a business say "I don't want you using my power!"? Sure. But they'd be idiots to do so - they aren't required to provide you with bathrooms either, but they do (for free, generally) because serving the customer's needs and desires makes them more money than it costs to do.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    2. Re:Turnabout is fair play... by glpierce · · Score: 1

      "they aren't required to provide you with bathrooms either"

      Restaurants with sit-down dining are legally required to have restrooms in most of the US, I believe.

      --
      G
    3. Re:Turnabout is fair play... by Diomedes+Tydeus · · Score: 1

      Actually... in many places if a restaurant has a seating area, they are required by some states to have a bathroom.

      -Diomedes

      --
      As for Diomedes, you could not say whether he was more among the Achaeans or the Trojans.
    4. Re:Turnabout is fair play... by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Sure. Just don't bring any food or drink with you. I like to enjoy the food I eat, so don't expect me to whip you up anything inexpensive - you're a customer, not an invited guest, so I'm not feeding you on my nickel. Oh, and the time I spend at the office isn't free, so don't expect the time I spend in the kitchen to be.

      Now, if you still want that address....

      It's the food service industry. You're giving the customer an experience - the actual product's just a part of it. If someone else provides a better experience than you - well, don't expect a lot of repeat customers.

    5. Re:Turnabout is fair play... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You remind me of an old landlady. The apartment I once lived in had an outlet on the wall outside my back door. The parking lot was also there, and she parked her RV right next to this outlet, so she could recharge. I questioned her about it and she said it was an outlet for outside use (electric hedge trimmers, etc.) I then showed her that that outlet was tied to the circuit breaker which also controlled my INSIDE bedroom light. Thus, I was paying for it. She unplugged it. Years later, after I was long gone, and the apartment had a new tenant, I drove by. She had her RV plugged in again.

    6. Re:Turnabout is fair play... by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For everyone who thinks this is OK, how about putting an extension cord out your window and publishing your address.

      When I walk into someone's house with my laptop, I immediately plug it in. They don't mind. They invited me into their home, and use of all the facilities (bathrooms and power plugs included). When I'm invited into a business, I'm also given free use of the restrooms, so why not the power outlets as well? Use of the restroom is much greater cost than plugging in a laptop for the duration of my stay.

      When you invite people into your house, do you charge them to use the bathroom? Do you charge them to get a glass of water? Would you charge them to plug in a cell phone? If so, you must not have any friends, if not, why would you expect to be treated more poorly when invited in by a business?

    7. Re:Turnabout is fair play... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Could be, I don't do building codes. However, let's change "restaurant" to "service business without food" (gas station, record store, etc.). They may or may not have one, but most try to because they know that most things that make their customer happier with them is likely to be good for their business.

      Gas stations with bathrooms do more business than those without.

      Cafes with free wifi do better business than those without.

      Record stores with listening stations do better than those without.

      Etc.

      And I'm going to bet that restaurants with easy access to plugs do better than those without (this may not apply to $100 per plate French places, but anywhere someone isn't going to feel socially stigmatized for using electronics, it should apply.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    8. Re:Turnabout is fair play... by scbomber · · Score: 1

      Although, in big cities I visit in the US there are signs that say "No Public Restroom" as well...

    9. Re:Turnabout is fair play... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even if I don't have to pee, I don't patronize those places--their attitude sucks.

  68. Safety issues? by scottme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What if some punter comes in with a defective charger that fuses the outlet circuits or worse, starts a fire?

    Some establishments (my kid's school for example) don't allow any electrical appliances to be used unless they have been through a safety check.

    The same concern may apply at hotels etc. I wonder what the liability position is. Is it the establishment owner or the owner of the defective device?

    1. Re:Safety issues? by justins · · Score: 1
      What if some punter comes in with a defective charger that fuses the outlet circuits or worse, starts a fire?

      For the first, there's this innovation known as "circuit breakers." For the second, the procedure is to point and laugh.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    2. Re:Safety issues? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1
      UK Health and Safety law states that any mains powered device must have PAT certification (Portable Appliance Test) at regular intervals if it is to be used in any public place (ie anywhere outside of your own home -- even your friend's house counts as a public place).

      I do not know if the establishment owner has a responsibility to ensure that all visitors adhere to this, but I have yet to see a privately owned laptop with a PAT sticker....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    3. Re:Safety issues? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      That's what the RCDs are for at the power panel (even my house has RCDs, they aren't expensive) and if it came to the worst, the fire extinguisher.

    4. Re:Safety issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your in the USA, flip over your power supply and see the UL #. That means its been tested and certified as safe within some guidelines. Underwriter Labratories has a website. If you spell laboratories correctly, I'll betcha you can find it.

      My power supply on the otherhand says TUV Rheinland Product Safty. I don't know who the fuck they are, but it looks like a nice sticker. They probably spent some money testing stuff before they put that nice of a sticker on it.

      A/C because I kept putting off registering when slashdot started, and I refuse to have a 600,000+ id with the rest of the rabble.

    5. Re:Safety issues? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      What if some punter spills something flammable all over the smoking area? What if his battery-powered cell phone catches fire? There are plenty of ways to break things and cause damage without involving an electrical plug.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    6. Re:Safety issues? by myov · · Score: 1

      Some establishments (my kid's school for example) don't allow any electrical appliances to be used unless they have been through a safety check.


      When I worked at a hospital few years ago, all devices needed to be electrically inspected as a complete unit. Clones always needed a special inspection since the P/S was inspected independently of the entire system. Name-brand machines never had that problem since the entire unit was tested.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  69. Restaurant Plug by Ann+Elk · · Score: 1

    Panera Bread Company in Fort Worth, TX on University Drive. Good food (sandwiches, soup, etc), free wireless, and signs indicating the booths that have power available for laptops. All this, and cute college chicks from nearby TCU...

    1. Re:Restaurant Plug by Lovesquid · · Score: 0

      Um, you know that this entire chain is owned by Starbucks, right?

    2. Re:Restaurant Plug by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      hmmm... If it is owned by Starbucks it's interesting that they provide free wifi at most of their locations. Maybe their doing a comparison between free wifi and pay (t-mobile) wifi. I always recommend Panara Bread to people looking for a place to connect. The shops are always clean and spacious, plus the foods not bad.

    3. Re:Restaurant Plug by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1


      Huh? It is a publicly traded comapany that started it's life as "The St. Louis Bread Company", was bought by Au Bon Pain, was divested and had a name/ticker symbol change in there also. No Starbucks that I can see.

  70. Why are they there, anyway? by regcrusher · · Score: 0

    If business owners are mad about people plugging devices in, why are there electric outlets there anyway?

  71. Leeching's too nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is clearly Power Piracy or maybe even Power Terrorism

  72. Outlet lock down. by fr2asbury · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's why you need to carry around one of those adapters that plug into an incandescent lightbulb socket with a couple plugs on the side. That way if they lock down the outlets, all you need to do is sit next to a lamp.

    Oh . . . and bring an oven mit along too, if the light is on.

  73. Pathetic billing structure by j.leidner · · Score: 1

    So they are constantly charging you for things you don't use? I think such a mode of billing not only rips you off, it encourages wastefulness in off-peak times (because everything is 'free' unless you stay below-peak).

  74. Outlets by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    I have thought about drawing outlets on our maps, but we haven't set that up yet. Would this be useful for our mobile users looking for access AND power?

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Outlets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice software.... great map it put out...

      Wi-Fi Map for michigan

      Warning: pg_connect() [function.pg-connect]: Unable to connect to PostgreSQL server: FATAL: The database system is starting up . in /usr/local/www/data-dist/modules/getcitiesinstate. php on line 37

      Warning: pg_query(): supplied argument is not a valid PostgreSQL link resource in /usr/local/www/data-dist/modules/getcitiesinstate. php on line 39

      Warning: pg_num_rows(): supplied argument is not a valid PostgreSQL result resource in /usr/local/www/data-dist/modules/getcitiesinstate. php on line 41
      michigan has entries:
      Warning: pg_num_fields(): supplied argument is not a valid PostgreSQL result resource in /usr/local/www/data-dist/modules/getcitiesinstate. php on line 45

      I can see my house right next to that pg_num_fields()

      broken != useful.

  75. Use the force, Luke! [Re: Victoria Central] by j.leidner · · Score: 1
    I brought my phone's charger. Little did I know that those silly brits used *square* power wall plugs instead of the European standard.

    Yes, but you can get standard European plugs into British power points with a little force even without your leatherman. ;-)

  76. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by swb · · Score: 1

    The company I work for is in a large, multi-tenant office tower and I know for a fact we don't cut a check to the power company, our power costs are part of the rent, figured based on some wattage-per-square-foot formula.

    When we put in new air conditioning for a data center, they made us put a meter on the feed to the air conditioning units, but I don't think it's resulted in any surcharges -- they just wanted to be able to see what kind of power these units actually consumed.

  77. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by Twanfox · · Score: 1

    Sitting in San Francisco International Airport one trip, I had the misfortune of having to wait for my flight to arrive. Having nothing else to do, I pulled out my Laptop (having been drained of much of it's power already) and plugged it into a local socket. Funny thing about that socket, it was one of those localized ones that has it's own circuit breaker built in, similar to the ones you find in bathrooms. In the event my laptop, god forbid, had drawn too much power, it would've likely (if they designed it smartly) tripped the circuit breaker in the plug itself, and only that circuit breaker.

    I could have reset the switch myself by simply pushing the reset button on the socket, had it come to that. Seems like a pretty darn smart way to localize a power socket that the public may be using.

  78. OFFTOPIC: Nice website - www.nynet.biz by t3n0r · · Score: 1

    Just wanted to say I took a look at the opening page(s) of your website and was impressed. Hope you get lots of business.

    --
    The only winning move is not to play.
    1. Re:OFFTOPIC: Nice website - www.nynet.biz by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      Thank you very much :)

  79. Denied at a Conference by phlack · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I was attending HP World 2004 in Chicago last year. I plugged into the wall to try to get into their wifi network that they set up throughout the center. Well a rather self-important (and large) convention center security guard came up and barked at me, saying I'm not allowed to plug it, because they don't provide free electricity. This was at a COMPUTER CONFERENCE! (yeah, I'm sure that laptop cost them plenty to power, compared to the escalator next to me that was running to a floor not being used) Ironically, I was also with a convention IT staffer, as well as a conference staffer, trying to help me out with something, and neither one of them could talk sense into the guy. They did both agree to talk to their various supervisors about it; dunno if it did any good.

    I spoke with one of the leaders of the conference about it (figuring I wasn't the only one who got yelled out), and she told me it was most likely due to union issues...the union apparently was very strong there and the conference staff wasn't allowed to pull any cables...they needed union convention center staffers to do it. What that has to do with me plugging in a personal laptop is beyond me. Should I have gotten a union rep to do it instead?

    I'll chalk it up to lack of intelligence on the guard's part, but I had no further problems. 'Course, whenever I saw that guy, I immediately unplugged.

    1. Re:Denied at a Conference by Humba · · Score: 1

      The conference leader was right on: she was trying to avoid a union issue. You are not allowed to plug *anything* into the wall at the large Chicago convention sites. You must have a union electrician do it.

      They're trying to revise the rules here (I live in Chicago) as they're finding more and more conventions are leaving town.

      --H

    2. Re:Denied at a Conference by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      Aside from the union issue, conference people really don't like tripped breakers during the show. That is very, very bad.

      The rules about plugging in unauthorized stuff probably originated before laptops when a lot of things people would plug in were extra lighting for their booth or a microwave under a table for booth workers' convenience. The electricity budget is carefully planned out ahead of time and stuff like that could easily trip a breaker if the kilowatts were not counted up. So, there was an alignment between the conference organizer's needs (no tripped breakers) and the unions needs (more work for their electricians) so the rules got made. [I am not suggesting electricians actually looked up documents to evaluate power usage before plugging stuff in. It's more that they want an electrican around so that when someone does plug something new in and the breaker trips, at least he's right there and available and knows where the breaker is and can reset it in a couple of minutes without bothering convention management about it.]

      But even know, I don't have much confidence that security guards would be knowledgable about power consumption for various typical appliances. Things like a CRT, a plasma display, and an LCD monitor may all be lumped into the same mental category by the security guard (looks like a TV) even though the power consumption varies 20:1 among them.

  80. Does it hurt to ask? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    If I go into a coffee shop that I haven't been in before, I'll ask the barista if it's cool to use an outlet.

    They've always responded with "Oh, sure, no problem!" so far.

    Starbucks usually has outlets available anyway. Guess I'm not "stealing" energy. heh.

  81. WTF?! by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's a friggin 24/7 coffee shop in MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN but I cannot find *any* here in the goddamn SILICON VALLEY. There is something seriously wrong with this picture. :P

    "Heart of technology" my ass. This dump sucks. I'm going to Wisconsin!

    1. Re:WTF?! by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      A fat lot of good that will do you when your laptop comes out of its bag as a big block of ice half the year.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:WTF?! by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      There's a friggin 24/7 coffee shop in MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN but I cannot find *any* here in the goddamn SILICON VALLEY. There is something seriously wrong with this picture.

      Happy Donuts at 3916 El Camino Real between Palo Alto and Mountain View has blazing-fast wifi, and extension cords hanging down from the ceiling at intervals along the outside wall. It's wall-to-wall laptops in the evening but you can usually find a space. Open 24-7.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    3. Re:WTF?! by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      Dude, if I had a +10 Informative, you'd get it. I'm going to go check that out as it's right on my way to work. :D

    4. Re:WTF?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, now it's going to be even more impossible to find an empty seat there. :)

  82. Wait... she's *how* old? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

    > Similarly, Mr. Bond of Intel said his 20-year-old daughter recently discovered that her iPod Mini's battery lasts longer if she limits the use of the backlight on the L.C.D. screen.

    Naah... too easy.

  83. Re: banana and cheese recipes. by DjReagan · · Score: 1

    > please share your recipes that combine bannanas and cheese

    Here's mine:

    Toast some bread. Slice bananas on to it, cover the banana with cheese and pop it under the grill until the cheese melts.

    Most people are quite dubious about this recipe when they hear it, but just about everyone who tries tasting it really quite likes it.

    --
    "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
  84. Airports are surprisingly lacking in outlets by swb · · Score: 1

    I don't know if its some kind of airport policy, an FAA thing, or something deliberate, but I've found available outlets mighty scarce at MSP, LGA, and SNA. If you can find them, they're often along walls of corridors where it's highly impractical to sit. If you *can* find seats near outlets, often the outlets are in use or the seats are taken by non-power consuming people (how *rude*!).

    MSP has these "business centers" where you can (rent?) a cube-like space, but they're a million miles from the gate (at least *my* gate!).

    I've largely given up on my AC adapter and just lug a couple of spare laptop batteries. 1 battery gets me through a DVD on the flight, one's enough for pre-flight wifi/itunes, and the third is power for wherever I end up. Sometimes the third ends up in checked luggage with the adapter if I know I won't need it.

  85. Link to coffee shop that freaked about power. by louissypher · · Score: 1

    Last year alt.coffee in NYC freaked out about power consumption. I don't know if it is still this way. It's a pretty good discussion on what the real costs are.
    http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwi reless /2004-February/008140.html

    --
    www.bleepyou.com
  86. The real issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real issue with restaurants is not going to be electricity cost ... MAYBE a cent an hour per user ... but whether the additional time spent in the facility will result in an increase in purchases. For a restaurant to be profitable, they must "turn the tables". They also have to consider the legal liability. What if ... power fails, power damages your system, someone trips over the cord, your cord has bare wires and electrocutes someone ... DARN LAWYERS ... but more, DARNED PUBLIC.

  87. Surely the point of Wi-Fi... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1
    ... is not having to plug in.

    Otherwise you might as well have LAN points next to the power sockets....

    HAL
    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    1. Re:Surely the point of Wi-Fi... by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Having to carry and plug in two bulky and annoying cords instead of just one makes it twice as annoying. Also, running ethernet to every seat is probably more expensive than just setting up a wireless access point.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  88. How all this relates to "multi-access" by dbond · · Score: 1

    Have a brief read of my white paper on 4G on this subject. Basic tenant: "Who cares what the access is - 3G, GSM, WiFi. I just want my public IP address HERE AND NOW, wherever and whenever. Operator beware - this is a buyers market." David

  89. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    It's called a "GFCI" (ground fault circuit interrupter). They also prevent you from getting electrocuted.

    They are supposed to prevent minor shocks, too. Last year while camping, I was plugging in some of those dumb xmas-type "camping" lights. One of the bulbs was broken and I was leaning on it (D'oh!). The lights were plugged into the camper, which was plugged into a long cord plugged into a GFCI outlet. The breaker tripped, but due to the capacitice in all the wire, I got the SHIT knocked out of me!

  90. Yes, they pay for other things, including air by marcus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Restaurants definitely pay for their air.

    The air you breathe is processed, filtered, temperature and humidity regulated. That costs money and customers are people who are willing to pay for "atmosphere" which usually does include special lighting.

    They pay for water, for toilets, for square footage.

    That gravity that's holding your ass to the seat, that's called "real estate". Underneath your fat ass is dirt and that is where the gravity comes from.

    What's so far off the mark? Another poster noted that restaurants are in the service industry, not the food industry. He is exactly on target. Power is just another potential service that they can market just like any utility(service) company. Hell, they could even improve the power and advertise "uninterruptible" for a premium if they thought there was a market for it.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
    1. Re:Yes, they pay for other things, including air by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      That gravity that's holding your ass to the seat, that's called "real estate". Underneath your fat ass is dirt and that is where the gravity comes from.
      Technically, the dirt under your ass contributes only a tiny fraction of the gravity you're using. Most of it comes from the majority of the earth that isn't under you, but is off to one side or another. More communism! Bill was right!
    2. Re:Yes, they pay for other things, including air by pyite · · Score: 1

      Erm. Take a look at a sphere sometime, or more properly an ellipsoid. On a positively oriented surface, everything is under you if you're on the surface. At any given point on the surface, the gravitational potential between you and every other particle vectorally sum "down," orthogonal to the surface and it doesn't matter that they also may be to the left or right of you.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    3. Re:Yes, they pay for other things, including air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are ignorant of how tides work. The grandparent is spot on. The less point-like the gravitational attractor looks to you, the more tidal stress you experience. I.e. you are stretched longitudinally and squished at right angles overall.

  91. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by Smylers · · Score: 1
    I eventally linked it to the server in the lab to turn on a light when we were nearing our "peak meter threshold"

    Um ... surely if you were trying to save power it would've been better to turn a light off rather than on?

    Smylers
  92. The REAL issue: Consent by lux55 · · Score: 1

    The "is this right or wrong" issue here isn't whether a business will let you, or whether it costs you extra, but whether you've obtained consent to use their power. If they provide it as part of their service (as some apparently do), then consent is implicit. If not, then if you haven't obtained their permission first, you are a thief. Plain and simple.

    Any justification otherwise is simply an attempt to justify being a thief. It doesn't make it right, it just makes you more pathetic of a thief.

    You could say that you would stick to places that do let you, but some places (especially independently owned shops) might not advertise this and so from those it is your duty to ask permission. If I was a shop owner and I saw you simply plugging in without asking, I'd make you stop. If I was asked first, I'd honestly consider it. I might charge you (because I can, and because it wasn't factored into my costs originally), but it wouldn't be much. A fair shop owner might post a notice "$0.25 surcharge per visit for use of outlets for laptops and other portable devices."

    1. Re:The REAL issue: Consent by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      You could say that you would stick to places that do let you, but some places (especially independently owned shops) might not advertise this and so from those it is your duty to ask permission.

      It is not your duty (socially, anyway) to ask permission to do things that most ordinary people would consider reasonable. Consent is implicit for things that are generally considered to be reasonable. If you choose to place unreasonable restrictions, it is your obligation to be explicit about them.

      If I was a shop owner and I saw you simply plugging in without asking, I'd make you stop.

      If you were a shop owner, and you behaved that way, in this or other contexts, you wouldn't be a shop owner for long.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    2. Re:The REAL issue: Consent by lux55 · · Score: 1

      Your arbitrary definition of "reasonable" based on a poll of your friends (hardly a majority justifying the title "most ordinary people") doesn't give you the permission to help yourself to somebody else's resources. And even if the majority of people could be convinced you were right, it still doesn't make it so (the public is convinced of quite a lot of falsities these days). The claim that the majority's opinion is always right (because it happens to be beneficial to you at this juncture) is what's called an "appeal to the masses" (also known as a "logical error").

      It doesn't matter if it costs someone else $0.000,000,001 or $10,000,000.00, you're still using somebody else's resources without asking, and in doing so, you're still a thief.

      I'll repeat an analogy I've seen elsewhere on this discussion: If you were to water your garden all summer with your neighbour's hose (without asking) then plug your Christmas tree lights into your other neighbour's outlet (again, without asking), how popular do you think you'd be with your neighbours?

      Besides the fact that your entitlement attitute is immature and moronic, it's not that hard to go up and ask permission.

    3. Re:The REAL issue: Consent by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Your arbitrary definition of "reasonable" based on a poll of your friends (hardly a majority justifying the title "most ordinary people") doesn't give you the permission to help yourself to somebody else's resources.

      I didn't take a poll of my friends. I read the New York Times article and the entire discussion here.

      And even if the majority of people could be convinced you were right, it still doesn't make it so (the public is convinced of quite a lot of falsities these days). The claim that the majority's opinion is always right (because it happens to be beneficial to you at this juncture) is what's called an "appeal to the masses" (also known as a "logical error").

      Sorry, you're incorrectly applying the principle there. When the matter under discussion is what the masses find to be appropriate or reasonable, an "appeal to the masses" is precisely the right way to sort it out. There is no factual correct or incorrect answer that can be divined by logic, so discussion of fallacies is specious.

      I'll repeat an analogy I've seen elsewhere on this discussion: If you were to water your garden all summer with your neighbour's hose (without asking) then plug your Christmas tree lights into your other neighbour's outlet (again, without asking), how popular do you think you'd be with your neighbours?

      That's a stupid analogy. You are not your neighbor's customer.

      I'll repeat an analogy I've seen elsewhere in this discussion: If you were to go to a coffee shop and push the button on the hot air dryer in the bathroom one more time than necessary - hence using about 10x more energy than a charging a laptop - do you think anyone would give a rat's ass?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    4. Re:The REAL issue: Consent by lux55 · · Score: 1

      I didn't take a poll of my friends. I read the New York Times article and the entire discussion here.

      This is your appeal to the masses that I mentioned. Regardless of what they believe, you are, and so are they, in error.

      The matter under discussion is not simply whether the public deems it acceptable, but also whether it actually is acceptable. Whether the public thinks it's acceptable or not, the latter is the appropriate discussion for determining whether it is acceptable in actuality. An opinion poll is not a source from which you can reliably derive facts, plain and simple.

      If you want, we can split the discussion into two: one group can pat themselves on the back for finding a clever new way of stealing (in the unconsenting cases) electricity from businesses, and the other can rationally discuss whether this practice is fair or not. Join whichever you prefer, but I'm sticking with the latter.

      The public opinion on the matter is quite predictable too: It boils down to whatever is convenient for them, and rhetorically justifiable enough to excuse themselves of responsibility for their actions.

      As for your analogy, it is also flawed. For one, the amount of energy in use is irrelevant. That's a rhetorical trick. Stealing a penny-candy or stealing a yacht, you're still stealing. Secondarily, if you were deliberately using the hot air dryer for purposes other than it was intended for (drying off), and in doing so you used more than your share, you would be misusing the hot air dryer. A clearer analogy, to stick with them for now, is you ordering a coffee then drinking a glass-worth of cream too (and maybe pocketing a few sugar packets while you're at it). The cream was there so it could augment your coffee, not so you could help yourself to as much as you want. The electricity is there because it is needed to heat your coffee, not so you could help yourself to it for whatever you want (without asking, of course).

      As for my analogy, it's irrelevant whether I'm a customer of my neighbour's or not. In ordering a coffee, if I didn't also request the use of some additional electricity, and the use of said electricity wasn't implied to be part of the transaction, then I'm using it without consent. Period. You can't simply waive consent wherever it benefits you, or you're a hypocrite.

      The simple point I was trying to make is that asking permission to do something is a) courteous, b) correct, c) not that much effort, and d) often appreciated by the person you've asked. I've read several posts bitching about shop owners disapproving of the unconsented use of their electricity. These people would do well to consider that maybe the shop owner isn't the jackass, but rather, they are themselves.

      Anyone who argues that asking is too much effort, and that they shouldn't have to ask, is lazy, ignorant, and has a false sense of entitlement to services they aren't entitled to, nor deserve.

    5. Re:The REAL issue: Consent by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, our fundamental disagreement seems to be this:

      You believe that the "natural" or expected condition is that coffee shops don't want you using their electricity, and therefore it is proper to first ask permission.

      I believe that the natural condition is that coffee shops don't care, and this is evidenced by the fact that they never object (except in a few cases brought up in this Slashdot topic which were mentioned precisely because of their exceptional variance from the norm), and indeed often make extra outlets available for laptop users. Therefore I believe it's as pointless and even insulting to ask permission to plug in, as it is to ask permission to use the bathroom sink to wash off a coffee stain instead of just washing my hands.

      Stealing a penny-candy or stealing a yacht, you're still stealing.

      Well, no. The difference between a penny candy and a yacht is that people don't want you taking their yachts, but they will gladly let you have penny candies to keep you as a customer. The penny candies come in the form of fancy scented bathroom soap, free condiments to use while you're consuming their products, and various other amenities that are cheap to provide but make customers happy. They do not generally include yachts though.

      The electricity is there because it is needed to heat your coffee, not so you could help yourself to it for whatever you want (without asking, of course).

      This would be germane if we had read an article about people going behind the counter and unplugging coffee-making equipment so they could charge their laptops.

      However, the article I read was about people using outlets that had been provided in the customer seating area. It was also about how store owners welcomed their use because it made the customers happy.

      The simple point I was trying to make is that asking permission to do something is a) courteous, b) correct, c) not that much effort, and d) often appreciated by the person you've asked. I've read several posts bitching about shop owners disapproving of the unconsented use of their electricity. These people would do well to consider that maybe the shop owner isn't the jackass, but rather, they are themselves.

      Nope, the shop owner is clearly the jackass. They are turning away business to save a few cents.

      Now, I've read other posts about some shops that are taking away outlets because customers who plug in end up hogging tables all day long. That makes good sense to me and I can sympathize with that. However the issue is certainly not about "stealing" electricity but rather about loitering in the shop without making more purchases.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  93. Idiots, all of you. by infochuck · · Score: 1

    The answer to the portable power problem is right in front of your nose (actually, on top of your head): make that tinfoil hat do double-duty!
    Simply affix a few square feet of solar panelling to the top, tape a wire to the foil and stick the other end in your notebook/PDA/air pump for the blowup doll, and volia!

  94. PLug in anywhere by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    I have not had anyone complain when plugging in a laptop in any restaurant. I have had issues finding a socket though. Once I found it, they usually did not care if I used it. If someone buys something, it should just be part of the service. If someone just walks in JUST to plug in, well that's a different story.

    I know what someone needs to invent....a safe and portable power strip. One that uses a retractable cord and maybe folds in the middle.

    --

    Gorkman

  95. Re:WEP ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make your public power outlets switched, and let the A/C switch be controlled by the server. (RS/232 or USB to a simple solenoid would do the trick). A user has to pay their WI-FI toll, get the WEP key, and login on battery power - then once logged in the server can switch on the A/C circuit to the wall power.

  96. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by jimwelch · · Score: 1
    Sounds like a GFCI outlet. It does not limit current flow. See this http://doityourself.com/electric/gfci.htm for full info. A small excerpt:

    A "GFCI" is a ground fault circuit interrupter. A ground fault circuit interrupter is an inexpensive electrical device that, if installed in household branch circuits, could prevent over two-thirds of the approximately 300 electrocutions still occurring each year in and around the home. Installation of the device could also prevent thousands of burn and electric shock injuries each year.The GFCI is designed to protect people from severe or fatal electric shocks Because a GFCI detects ground faults, it can also prevent some electrical fires and reduce the severity of others by interrupting the flow of electric current.

    In homes built to comply with the National Electrical Code (the Code), GFCI protection is required for most outdoor receptacles (since 1973), bathroom receptacle circuits (since 1975), garage wall outlets (since 1978), kitchen receptacles (since 1987), and all receptacles in crawl spaces and unfinished basements (since 1990).

    --
    Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
  97. Mobile phone charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In India recently, I noticed a "Mobile Phone Charging Point" on the platform of a railway station - I was very impressed until I realised that this means they expect trains to be so late that there is some point to charging a phone while you wait...

  98. hitchhiker's guide to freecharging by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    When I first moved back to NYC, all my gear (including my wallplug charger) was packed in storage. So I would take a cab ride, and plug into the cigarette lighter. I'd call a "black car" (unmetered, charge by geographical zone) with my last juice, plug in, and ask for a route through the most congested traffic possible within a single zone. I usually got over 10min for $5, a ride to lunch, and at least a 75% recharge, good for a day or two.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:hitchhiker's guide to freecharging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JESUS CHRIST that is THE STUPIEST way I've ever heard to get charging... you're PAYING UP THE ASS!

      And you said "hichhiker's guide to freecharging"... How is paying $5 to get 10 minutes of 12V FREE??? Who pays $10 in cab fare to get lunch?

      Plus 10 minutes is NOT 75% of any battery that I've ever heard of... maybe your cell phone would report 2-3 bars of power after 10 minutes, but I bet it didn't actually stay there for more then a few minutes after being unplugged. Those indicators are based on voltage, which drops fast once you're pulled off the charger, but it isn't instanteous, which is why it reports "full" even after a few minutes.

      Not even the cheapest 12V charger will charge a battery at the current rate needed to hit 75% in 10 minutes... if it did you'd have two problems: 1) your battery in the PC/cell phone would get SUPER hot and 2) you'd be stuffing so much current into the battery in such a little time that it'd be wasted after a handful of recharges...

      Instead of wasting time and money in cabs and cars trying to get a few minutes of recharging, UNPACK YOUR STUFF!

      Assuming you can get lunch locally and don't need a cab ride, you could just buy new chargers for the prices your paying-- what it's cost? maybe $30 to buy one of those iGo universal chargers and then other $5-10 per tip for the various devices. The 110V I have will charge 3 devices at once too.

    2. Re:hitchhiker's guide to freecharging by hughk · · Score: 1

      Some London black-cabs do this as a standard service, but you don't need to provide the charging adapter. Also, Vodafone a mobile airtime supplier at some of there shops offer a free emergency top up charge service, no matter which company is your airtime provider.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    3. Re:hitchhiker's guide to freecharging by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You obviously have no idea what it's like living in NYC with money, but no home, and no desire for extra pocket bulges that make you look "homeless". Don't panic, just put on these blinders and keep your naive comments to yourself - you sound like an Earthling astrophysicist.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  99. RCD by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 1


    Given most houses today have RCD's (Residual Current devices/detector) installed, you can bet public building do.

    1. Re:RCD by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      BTW, what's the difference between RCD and GFCI?

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  100. Re: banana and cheese recipes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toast some bread. Slice bananas on to it, cover the banana with cheese and pop it under the grill until the cheese melts.

    "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"

    Mission accomplished. ;-)

  101. My Choice by hhawk · · Score: 1

    I own a Restaurant (http://www.schnackdog.com);

    a) we offer wifi
    b) we offer electrical connections

    Some people use neither; some use just the wifi because they have nice laptops with big batteries and they don't lug their powercords with them. Other use both and that's ok. I want them in the store, ordering soda, fries, beer or just hanging out and making us look busy.

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
  102. Coffee= rent by 3point1415927 · · Score: 1

    I agree, this makes a lot of sense. A nice coffee shop in Tokyo's crowded area of Shibuya has very high prices, maybe US$6-7 for a small cup of coffee or cappucino. This seems so silly, when you could buy it in the vending machine for less than 1/5 the price. But as my brother pointed out, the reason you pay so much here in that busy area isn't that this coffee is particularly good, but the fact that you get to sit down to drink it and have a table to work at, and this is such a crowded expensive place that businesses must pay a lot to rent their store. Coffee=rent is a pretty common view in this area, and people take it to the full extent; you can find people sitting in these coffee shops for 8 hours, one sip of cold coffee left in the cup in front of them.

  103. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    are not charged according to the number of units used, but by the maximum amount of power they use during the billing period.

    I had an uncle whose house (in a Cleveland suburb) was set to a similar billing plan. The house was all electric (the street didn't have natural gas lines at the time it was developed) so he had a device that measured the electricity load at any one time, and could shut the power to certain high energy appliances in order to reduce the load in a pre-determined sequence (for instance, first dryer, then refrigerator...et cetera.)

  104. Not me by cecirdr · · Score: 1
    It costs a penny or so to charge up my laptop. I might toss the store a dime to cover it but nothing more than that. That's plenty of markup to give them profit....but it's also a silly thing to do to a customer. Mean spirited really...why does everything have to be about profit? Why don't people just help out and go with the flow if a situation isn't hurting anyone? I guess a store *might* make an extra buck a day charging for people to plug in....Woohoo. Good will and customer satisfaction is much more profitable. You'll get more folks in the store, sell more java or pints....boom! Much more than a buck a day extra profit.

    What goes around comes around.

    Ceci

    1. Re:Not me by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      Funny:

      why does everything have to be about profit?

      And then you say:

      Good will and customer satisfaction is much more profitable. You'll get more folks in the store, sell more java or pints....boom!

      So, to reiterate... Why does everything have to be about profit?

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    2. Re:Not me by cecirdr · · Score: 1
      Well, this thread's ancient history now, but I'll reply anyway.

      Since things are already about profit in every decision a company makes, then consider that you'll make more profit by treating customers well, rather than trying to imply that they're theives.

      There appeared to be irony in my statement, but only if you don't figure out the implied argument in the whole reply that things are *already* all about profit. So given that business model, then make the best decision you can as to what's more profitable.

      I still think it'd be nice to have companies not be so profit driven, but even so, implying your customers are stealing/leeching is not going to increase your bottom dollar.

      Ceci

    3. Re:Not me by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      Lol, yeah, it's ancient by now, but amen to that. ;)

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
  105. Stealing Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sue them all. Shop owners must be losing millions every year from this theft.

  106. ha! by hakalugi · · Score: 1

    MSM sees it too: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/06/technology/circu its/06powe.html?oref=login&8dpc

    --
    If she floats, she's a witch.
  107. You forgot about NYT soul sucking registration! by csoto · · Score: 1

    I gave them my SSN and credit card numbers, but I so love to read their stuff online!

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  108. Maybe in the US this is ok, but not elsewhere by huskerdoo · · Score: 1

    When I was traveling around Australia in 2002-2003, I would never even *think* of plugging my laptop into a power outlet. (or power point as they are known there). The only time where it was ok is if I had paid for a hostel room or a powered site at a caravan park. There were a few trendy coffeeshops in Sydney where this was ok though.

    A few times initially I just plugged in and it was made *very* clear to me that I should have asked first and no, it wasn't ok even if I had asked....and this was in a library. A lot of times it will be ok, but if you are traveling in a foreign country, always ask first.

    Eventually when traveling around the top end when I needed to do some power-intensive operation (copying mp3 CD's to my mp3 player), I would just offer the restaurant $2-3 for use of their power for an hour or so. No worries then.

    Traveling by bike around Australia with 5 thinkpad batteries was a bit of science. I would have to wake up at 3am in a hostel just to swap the batteries in my laptop and then go back to sleep. Sometimes instead of camping out I'd have to get a motel room just so I could spend the night charging batteries.

    I still don't take power for granted anymore, at least not after 1.5 years of planning my life around the need for a power outlet.

  109. Um... remember the CYBER-cafe's? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    OK before anything, i agree 100% with you. I'm just adding to the example.

    Cybercafes used to serve COFFEE for you. (now it's just the cyber, the coffee thing didn't work pretty well). If standard cafes are missing the fact that you're using a LAPTOP, they're missing potential clients by denying you access to their power outlets.

    Really - what's so hard of asking for 50 cents for electricity use?

    And regarding airports... well, you're probably going on a BUSINESS TRIP, aren't you? You wouldn't like to be on the plane without being able to use your laptop because you ran out of power.

    These times productivity is the big word. If you're not productive (even on your plane), then the airlines aren't helping.

    After all... THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT.

    1. Re:Um... remember the CYBER-cafe's? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Really - what's so hard of asking for 50 cents for electricity use?

      Please don't do this. I have a deep-seated moral objection to paying 50 cents for something that cost you 0.1 cents.

      And regarding airports... well, you're probably going on a BUSINESS TRIP, aren't you? You wouldn't like to be on the plane without being able to use your laptop because you ran out of power.

      Actually, most airline travellers aren't on business trips. The fact that all of the business people with expense accounts have made everything in airports far too expensive for me pisses me off to no end.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:Um... remember the CYBER-cafe's? by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      I no longer live in the US, and I left as the cyber-cafe trend was not taking off.

      Cyber cafe's are operating on a different model all together. 1st, renting a PC, that is properly maintained, is dirt cheap. And you make hand over fist. I spent a year studying aramaic, and charged other students $5 an hour to use a beat up old thinkpad, outside my dorm room. 1 computer(a P1), with 40 potential customers and I made $30 bruto a day, the laptop cost me $16 once, and the network connection cost me $1 a day. Scaling that to a commercial setting is just awsome to think about.

      Making coffee just seems like a good way to wreck keyboards, have more expenses, and have more equipment to maintain.

      People going to a cafe are also there for a reason. Their there on a mission (at least in Israel), and they have some place to go afterwords. Starbucks you go for coffee, enviroment. And your settling in to an extent.

      Again, electricity is CHEAP, and battery power devices are not particularly hungry. Keep them in there seats, keep them buying coffee and cookies.

    3. Re:Um... remember the CYBER-cafe's? by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

      A laptop draws, say, 50 watts, so a user sitting for an hour will use 0.05 kWH, which, at about 14 cents/kWH, is about 0.7 cents. Now, even if the laptop is powerful and electricity is expensive, that's still only 2 cents per hour, max, that the customer will be consuming. I think the bigger problem is customers filling seats for hours and not buying anything. Most restaurants and coffee shops are expected to have a certain turnover rate of customers throughout the day, so that by keeping the seats full they turn the profit required to keep in business.

  110. Re:LINK TO THE ARTICLE! Not Flamebait by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    What is it going to take to get /. editors ...

    I'd not call this Flamebait. It is a long-time valid complaint that I too wish Slashdot would address before any topic is posted. Today even my valid NYTimes account wasn't working and I had to re-login, which I don't do often enough to just remember the details. Real pain in the posterior.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  111. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    Wow and I thought the power company here in California were a bunch of blood suckers.

    That's like charging you an extra hundred dollars because you filled up a second cart (trolly) at the grocery store.

    We do have tiered pricing, it get's more expensive the more power you use based on user type, and they do have an option for charges based on peak/none peak usuage, but it's more to encourge solar/wind hook ins and conservation.

  112. No, thats the way it works by bluGill · · Score: 1

    My local power co-op is billed for peak usage continuously, each day. They pass that onto any large business - anyone who can cause large peaks in the load, to encourage them to not cause peaks.

    A power plant works best at 80-95% peak capacity (depending on the plant type and age). The ones that do best (efficiency, not related to capacity) take 2 weeks(!) to bring up to full power. So it is to the power companies advantage to use the same amount of power all day, with no dips or peaks. Anyone with large peaks mat peak time can expect to see a surcharge from the power company to deal with it, while those who peak at everyone Else's off time (overnight) get a discount.

  113. The real issue by changguang · · Score: 1

    Most of these posts have been from polite, courteous people. You guys are not the problem. I own a coffee house with free wifi, great drinks and what people tell me is great ambience and long hours. The problem has not been people plugging in; it has been people hogging the outlets. Here is a common scenario. Someone comes in, spends $1.40 on a cup of tea (I only do loose leaf here), then sits down in the best seat for 6 hours without buying anything else. We will have to turn away other people because this person won't budge. These people will even unplug lamps to plug their devices in.

    I won't go into the details of costs, but suffice it to say that once you figure in the cost of the electricity (which is about 2x residential rates by the way), I lose money on this person before figuring in labor and overhead costs. Then there is the opportunity cost that is lost, too. Don't tell me to just raise my prices -- I couldn't raise my prices enough to make much of a difference here. I could raise my margins by lowering the quality of my products, but I am loathe to do that. Plus, one of my biggest competitive differences is my product quality.

    So, I am more than open to solutions for this problem. I am increasing the seating density a bit to help reduce the impact of people like this. I grew up in Texas and I set up things so that you have elbow room -- a real rarity here in San Francisco. I've thought of expiring WIFI access after two hours, but that's going to require some software that I don't have. I can't think of a low-touch way to require minimum periodic purchases. It has to be low-touch because I only hire very nice, accomodating people and asking them to be time police is not going to work.

    An interesting detail is that this problem only occurs when student traffic is heavy. Yeah, I understand that maybe students can't afford to be courteous, but I can't have 40% of my business hours be unprofitable. I am barely breaking even as it is.

    I am not complaining. It is a pleasure to be your own boss and finding solutions to problems like this is really enjoyable. However, the attitude that "it's a cost of business, deal with it" is arrogant and condescending. In San Francisco, everything costs more for businesses -- taxes, insurance, permits, electricity, water, sewage, etc. Heck, taxes and insurance for my employees results in a surcharge of close to 25% of wages. That's not including what they pay. There are so many costs that are mandated or that you exert no control over (like a 35% increase in unemployment taxes), that you try your hardest to squeeze every tenth of a penny from anything you can.

    BTW, my place is called Pearls and is in San Francisco. And you can plug in.

    1. Re:The real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look into nocat.net. I think they've got an option for timing out access and their software is free.

    2. Re:The real issue by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      So, I am more than open to solutions for this problem.

      Fire your customer. Politely tell him that he has taken up the seat long enough, and unless he is going to order something else, please leave so that someone else may sit there. If they get mad and never come back, you just made money by kicking them out. You have the right to refuse service to anyone (and asking anyone to leave) - use it.

  114. In the US it depends on the restaurant's biz model by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I guess courtesy is out of order at the good ol' US of A.

    In the US it depends on the restaurant's business model. Some of them (fast food joints) go for the fast nickles and want turnover. Some of them (classic sit-down restaurants) go for the slow dimes, catering to people who want to meet over food, enjoy a meal at a more leisurely pace, etc. Some are happy to have you camp out there long-term, some arent (especially those that close between major meals for cleanup and redressing).

    And of course some restaurant managers are clueless about what is good for their business and what is not.

    What gets me are the ones that provide WiFi service but no outlets. B-(.

    Also: In the US getting wiring done to code costs a bundle - and may not be possible in leased space. (There are downsides to division of effort into separate businesses.) So some are OK with it but you have to use the outlets that were there for vacuums and the like. You have to ask for a table near the outlet and if it's busy you're on battery.

    (By the way: Shouldn't the last line of your sig be "find ~ -name 'base*' -exec chown you {} \;" ?)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  115. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the US there are code requirements for how circuits are laid out and wired, I'm sure it's the same in the UK.

    For example, in the US for commerical buildings the lights and outlets are seperate.

    Chances are very good that if you happened to short out an outlet somehow you'd only take 2-3 other outlets with you.

    Though I suppose in a poorly laid out building, or one where expansion was done haphazardly, you run the risk of cutting power to a computer at the gate terminal or something...

    But in general you'll likely only take out public outlets, nothing serious would happen...

    We short out outlets at work all the time... the outlets in the cubes are mounted sideways so that the hot leg is on top... as a result, if a plug is loose in the outlet (sticking out 1/2" or so) and you kick the metal panel trim panel off (very easy to do), it falls on the hot leg. Since the metal panel is grounded it trips the breaker.

    Solution is to make the damn metal panels stay in place, but they're snap in...

  116. Then think about by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    For reference, my portable computer's battery [...] would cost less than 0.6 cents. I will gladly pay 0.6 cents extra to use my laptop wherever I go, if asked for.

    Think about how much power it takes to run an ELEVATOR. (Sorry, don't have it handy - and it varies a lot by type, too.)

    Then about how much it takes to INSTALL AND MAINTAIN one.

    Laptop recharges are a vanishingly small expense by comparison.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  117. As oposed to... by Garabito · · Score: 1
    Motorola, which has a charger plug for V series, another one for C series, and a diferent one for T models.

    Man, that sucks.

  118. Back in My Day.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We actually ATE at restauraunts.. Or talked to real people. Good old internet, removing social skills since 1969.

  119. Yankerville? by poopie · · Score: 1

    C'mon, I can't be the only one who saw this and had to read the parent post simply because I *thought* it said Yankerville, can I?

    Hey Lady, I'm gonna charge my laptop! Yaay!

  120. California runs on image. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a friggin 24/7 coffee shop in MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN but I cannot find *any* here in the goddamn SILICON VALLEY. There is something seriously wrong with this picture. :P

    Some Silicon Valley cities require you to hire an off-duty cop as an armed guard if you want to be open after certain hours. (California's gun control has led to high crime rates and overnight stores are easy targets. The cities in question have used this as an excuse to set up a graft mechanism for their police officers.)

    Others just zone things like that out of exisesence - so you need to be grandfathered or get a variance from the zoning board to go 24/7.

    California runs the entertainment industry. The entertainment industry noticed that computer geeks keep late hours, jumped from that to the conclusion that Silicon Valley had more night life than the rest of the world, and promulgated that image.

    I moved here from southeastern Michigan, which really DID have lots of stores open 24/7. (When I left there was a drugstore near my old place with a 24/7 MANNED AUTO PARTS counter! Rebuilt waterpumps at 3 AM if you needed 'em.) It was quite a shock to discover that Silicon Valley actually rolled up the streets at night.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:California runs on image. by bbuR_bbuB · · Score: 1

      Are you sure crime is linked to California's 'gun control' laws, and not the fact that silicon valley is a rediculously affluent locale, and most businesses would have a bit more loot on hand than your average liquor store in Watts?

    2. Re:California runs on image. by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      California's gun control has led to high crime rates

      Actually, California's gun control is a response to high crime rates that resulted from a lack of sufficient gun control, and it's working.

      I'm not going to continue this discussion because it's off-topic and gun control debates never get anywhere, but if you can drop a little grenade in the thread, so can I.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    3. Re:California runs on image. by CountrySon · · Score: 0

      Nice post... I've lived in both areas and, when in California, I was very amused at the life-long coastal types and their coastal-centric beliefs. I think some of them really believed that Chicago was 3 stoplights and a corn silo.

    4. Re:California runs on image. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Are you sure crime is linked to California's 'gun control' laws, and not the fact that silicon valley is a rediculously affluent locale, and most businesses would have a bit more loot on hand than your average liquor store in Watts?

      Yep.

      The positive correlation between gun control laws and crime has been known for well over half a century. For some time there was debate over how much of it might be crime causing gun control laws (due to worried people), how much might be gun control laws causing crime (by creating a victim-rich environment), and how much might be extraneous factors (such as population density causing both). There was a lot of work to try to sort them out, and while it looked like it was laws causing crime it wasn't all that convincing.

      Then (after some studies surprised the researchers with how often guns are used to STOP crime) some jurisdictions tried changing concealed carry laws that discouraged it with laws that permitted and/or encouraged it. And crime in those jurisdictions dropped like a rock, leading to more such laws and more such crime drops.

      The sporadic semi-random passage of these laws, across areas with major variations in crime rate and recent deltas to it, got about as close to running a controlled experiment as you're ever likely to get on such a subject. This provided some very solid data for some very rigorous studies. These studies show that it's gun restrictions that promote crime, and that the effect is very large.

      Of course California's coastal cities, especially the ones around the SF Bay (where Silicon Valley lies) are the belly of the anti-gun beast. Don't expect CCW liberalization in CA any time soon.

      The fun part of this is that the researchers on several of the key projects were people who started out personally anti-gun and got a rude awakening. Fortunately they were good scientists and changed their opinions when confronted with real-world evidence.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    5. Re:California runs on image. by 241comp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I moved to OH a few years back and I really miss the 24/7 Autozone back in Buffalo, NY where I used to live. Nothing like being able to run out at 3:00AM when you have just diagnosed the bad starter on the car you have to drive to work in the morning.

  121. Entertainment or convenience? by phorm · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the majority, but I don't go to a restaurant to be entertained. Hospitality is a part of this, but entertainment? I don't expect my waiter to jump up and start dancing on a table with a tophat.

    I'd qualify restaurants more as a convenience: For when one doesn't feel like cooking, can't (on the road with no stove, etc), or is incapable of cooking the level/type of food provided.

    Maybe it's different in the USA. Most restaurants don't offer video games (fast food esp Macondalds etc which caters to kids does). Many do have music, but mostly it's pubs that have TV. Electricity... well I'm this can be expected of almost any indoor venue nowadays. It's not a convenience it's a requirement.

    And yes, that laptop plug is an extra that costs. In a place like Starbucks you're not just paying $5.50 for a latte, you're also getting the option of seating space and other amenitites.

    1. Re:Entertainment or convenience? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Hospitality is a part of this, but entertainment? I don't expect my waiter to jump up and start dancing on a table with a tophat.

      What is it you are doing when you have some friends over for dinner?

      You are entertaining.

      For when one doesn't feel like cooking, can't (on the road with no stove, etc). . .

      I am on the road a lot. I often live out of a bike messenger/panniers/gig bag (and here's a hot tip that some of you may not have considered. An acoustic guitar is hollow) for days at a time. It is never necessary to cook in any vaguely civilized country in order to obtain a good meal. It is simply a cultural bias to associate eating with cooking. I never have to carry a camp stove and the attendant fuel because I simply don't carry anything that needs cooking. They call it trail mix for a reason, and you can walk into any supermarket/deli/convenience store in the world and walk out with days worth of good food you can simply stick in your mouth and eat.

      I spent this past weekend in NYC living out of my gig bag. I spent less on food than I would have at home because I went to the corner markets where stuff is actually cheaper than it is outside of the city, instead of paying exorbitant city prices for restaurant meals which aren't even as healty anyway.

      An apple a day keeps the doctor away.

      And you don't have to cook them.

      KFG

    2. Re:Entertainment or convenience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "What is it you are doing when you have some friends over for dinner? You are entertaining."

      That's dumb, I believe the word has two meanings. In any case, are you therefore implying that whenever I go to a restaurant, I am being entertained, therefore the staff are my friends?

    3. Re:Entertainment or convenience? by kfg · · Score: 1

      That's dumb, I believe the word has two meanings.

      I can't help it if English is dumb. I didn't invent it. Many words have multiple meanings, but, in this case, you'll find they actually have a direct relationship if you think about it.

      . . .are you therefore implying that whenever I go to a restaurant, I am being entertained, therefore the staff are my friends?

      No. I am implying that they are your host. You may even be met at the door and seated by a young woman whose proper title is "hostess." And that is what you are paying for. To be a guest.

      Guests are entertained. Feeding them is part of the entertainment, as is treating them with respect and seeing to whatever other needs they might have that are reasonable to fulfill, like providing them with a place to pee, wash up a bit and plug in their laptop.

      KFG

    4. Re:Entertainment or convenience? by bob_herrick · · Score: 1

      The other really great thing about NYC is that the rats are quite large, and you probably won't have to cook them either.

  122. Receptacles may need to be upgraded by Animats · · Score: 1
    Duplex receptacles come in "Residential" grade (Levitron 5320-I, $0.68), "Commercial" grade (Levitron CR-15-I, $1.98), "Specification" grade (Hubbell HBL8200I, $20.88), and "Hospital" grade (Hubbell HBL8300I, $22.29). The cheap ones wear out, and may even crack, after a modest number of plugging cycles. The good ones last many decades. If a few people are using a laptop at some outlet every day, as might happen in a cafe, you can easily run through the lifetime of a cheap outlet in a year.

    And those aren't even GFCI. Outlets near bar tables intended for customer use really should be GFCI, or on a GFCI breaker, although the NEC doesn't currently require it.

    1. Re:Receptacles may need to be upgraded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that's Leviton, not Levitron.

      They should change it, I know. I always have an urge to say 'Levitron', myself.

  123. Flushing twice by phorm · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. Around here flushing twice is often a courtesy. Flushing ones can still leaving a surprise for the next customer that's generally not good for the location's reputation... and the guys that don't flush at all well...

    1. Re:Flushing twice by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      flushing twice is often a courtesy

      You just never know where a slashdot message thread will take you. Don't know how to respond to that, other than, um, thanks for flushing twice? We appreciate it.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  124. Re:Plug sharing ettiquette (hrmmmm) by Matt1313 · · Score: 1

    OT, I know...

    That is weird, you have the same rug and floor that we do, although our walls are painted a nice taupe (or whatever it is called). You have great taste!

  125. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by Twanfox · · Score: 1

    So what you're telling me is that a GFCI will probably stop a short circuiting device from electrocuting you or starting a fire (a concern with public access power sockets), but you can still overload it by plugging in 30 laptops or so into one circuit. Sounds to me like exactally the device to provide safety in public power outlets. Doesn't need to limit the power flow, per sae, it just needs to stop something bad from happening, like fire or death.

    Knew there was an appropriate name for those kinds of sockets, too. For the life of me, I couldn't recall it. Thanks.

  126. Laptops and Cafe Culture by Go+Aptran · · Score: 1

    I live in Seattle where there's so much WiFi available (free or otherwise) that it would be foolish for any business not to provide outlets for their customers. In fact, I've noticed places ADDING outlets and power strips. There's one place in Belltown that has a plug at each table, at table height so you don't even have to stoop over to plug in.

    The biggest problem that I can see some businesses having is that people DON'T WANT TO LEAVE their nice cushy spot next to an outlet, which can be off putting to other potential customers.

    I frequently see people walk up to a coffeehouse, look through the window... see that there's nowhere (near a plug) to sit and walk away.

    --

    "Under the spreading chestnut tree, I sold you and you sold me."

    1. Re:Laptops and Cafe Culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (replying as anonymous because I'm being off topic and there's no point in anyone wasting their mod points on this) The Uptown Espresso is the one I'm thinking of. I haven't been there in about a year and a half... but when I used to live in the neighborhood, I was there all the time with my laptop. They were just getting some form of wireless in the place when I moved to Capitol Hill where the wireless is too copious for words.

    2. Re:Laptops and Cafe Culture by sevenmonkey · · Score: 1
      There's an easy solution! Have uncomfortable seats!

      Take your standard Mickey D's booth. Nothing objectionable about those seats at first, but sit in one for more than 20 minutes and you'll find you are quite uncomfortable.

      That's no accident!

      -7m

  127. There is no story here. by Moofie · · Score: 1

    One rude waitress seems to think people shouldn't plug in in her restaurant.

    Everybody else on the damn planet seems to think it's fine.

    Wow. Those newshounds at NYT continue to impress me.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  128. The real numbers: by MavenW · · Score: 1
    Cellphones, ipods and even portable computers are not that power hungry that it would matter.
    This was exactly what I thought when I read the topic.

    Years ago I plugged my laptop into an airport plug for about 3 hours while waiting for a flight. I didn't feel quite right about "stealing" the power, so when I got home I thought I'd measure exactly how much it cost for me to run the laptop for 3 hours.

    The only ammeter I had was limited to 10 Amps of DC current. I had to hook up a 12 volt battery through an inverter, through the adapter and into the laptop. I pulled the battery out of the laptop to make sure I wasn't measuring charging current or anything. The measurement came out just less than 9 watts.

    Even ignoring any efficiency losses for the inverter and adapter, and choosing the most expensive prices for electricity around, I calculated I would have had to be stuck in that airport for more than 11 hours just to cost them a penny. If anyone had confronted me about it, I would have pulled out a penny and told them I was being generous and they could keep the change.

    Granted laptops use more power these days with their fancier color displays and more powerful processors, but still actual power usage on these devices is even lower than the ratings printed on the labels.

  129. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by FlexAgain · · Score: 1

    We short out outlets at work all the time... the outlets in the cubes are mounted sideways so that the hot leg is on top... as a result, if a plug is loose in the outlet (sticking out 1/2" or so) and you kick the metal panel trim panel off (very easy to do), it falls on the hot leg. Since the metal panel is grounded it trips the breaker.

    This can't really happen with UK plugs, by the time any metalwork of the Live conductor (or Neutral for that matter) is exposed, the pins will no longer be in contact with the matching contacts in the socket. Even with older plugs which tend to expose the live and neutral pins more, by the time you could easily make contact, the plug is probably about to fall out of the socket due to lack of grip from the contacts.

    --
    Actually it is rocket science...
  130. Two Critical Threats by dantheman82 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Threat Advisory: Elevated - Significant Risk of Terrorist Attacks

    1) You have Firefox as your primary browser, which has modified having Internet Explorer as the default browser. Would you like to restore the settings back to the default? (Highly recommended)

    2) You have iTunes as your default MP3 player, circumventing the functionality of Windows Media Player. Your Windows Media Player will not perform correctly without making it the default music player. Would you like to restore the settings back to default? (Highly recommended)

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
  131. Call me stupid but... by lullabud · · Score: 1
    ...is this even a sentence?
    As interesting as the phenomena of customers leeching power from the businesses they frequent is the self-imposed etiquette of many users.
    I've read it about 5 times and it still doesn't make sense, except in some abstract interpretation where some of the words in the middle are overlapped.
    1. Re:Call me stupid but... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      That is most certainly a complete sentence. It can be rewritten as

      The self-imposed etiquette of many users is as interesting as the phenomena of customers leeching power from the businesses they frequent.

      The problem with writing it this way is that the premise of the statement is not established until after the conclusion. This way is ambiguous because "users" have not been defined yet.

    2. Re:Call me stupid but... by lullabud · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're totally right. It makes sense now that you explained it, but it sure is hard to read. He must be a perl programmer.

    3. Re:Call me stupid but... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      See, you only read it 5 times... I understood it on the sixth :)

  132. Re:In the US it depends on the restaurant's biz mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (By the way: Shouldn't the last line of your sig be "find ~ -name 'base*' -exec chown you {} \;" ?)

    You are probably right, but the line in my sig should work if you are neat about your home directory... talk about running the above command as root :)

  133. Let's look at the numbers by janolder · · Score: 1
    Let's look at the numbers, for crying out loud!

    Let's say my power hungry laptop eats 100W. It doesn't but let's say it did. Googling for some raw data on cost yields a range of 3 to 43 cents per kilowatt hour. That computes to 0.3 to 4.3 cents per hour of laptop use.

    There is no business on this planet that wouldn't be willing to fork out 4.3 cents an hour to keep customers happy. Nothing to see here, please move on.

  134. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by drivers · · Score: 1

    They also prevent you from getting electrocuted.

    Sometimes. It detects a ground fault, e.g. a short between the power and the ground in the plug. However if you were to touch a live wire and the ground is through you and down into the real ground it would NOT trip the GFCI. (Disclaimer: IANAE)

  135. Not even 12 cents by Nexus7 · · Score: 1

    The marginal cost of a kWh is less than 10c in most places in the US. Most notebooks are well below 100 W. So you're looking at at most 1 c/hr of use. I think the Starbucks or whatever shop's margin is well above that. Weren't we bashing them just the other day for over-priced coffee?

  136. Sockets in the floor by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

    Lots of places (such as airports and train stations) have electric sockets in the floor, for running vacuum cleaners, floor buffers, and the like. I avail myself of these while traveling. Just find a chair near a socket, pry off the cover, and plug in.

    --
    "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    1. Re:Sockets in the floor by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Lots of places (such as airports and train stations) have electric sockets in the floor, for running vacuum cleaners, floor buffers, and the like. I avail myself of these while traveling. Just find a chair near a socket, pry off the cover, and plug in.

      That's supposed to be my secret. Also check behind vending machines; often there are two outlets but only one is being used. And clusters of wall-mounted pay phones may have an outlet underneath.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  137. my Half-cent... by MacBoy · · Score: 1

    A laptop user who plugs in his laptop for one hour, consuming 50 W of electricity (pretty high for a laptop actually), will use 0.05 kWh (kilo-Watt-hours). One kWh costs about 8 cents, so he uses less than 1/2 a cent of electricity during the hour.

  138. Here's a novel idea. by FrankieBoy · · Score: 1

    How about closing the laptop and picking up a book? As an IT Manager I'm as connected as the next guy but with many plane trips under my belt I've given up on the idea of working every second. Maybe I'm getting old but now I never remove my notebook from it's bag on trips any more and I've found no appreciable change in the volume or quantity of work I get done in an average week. Way back when I had a security guard at an airport tell me to unplug my laptop from the wall because those outlets we for "maintenance people only". There's lots of good books out there that need reading.

    1. Re:Here's a novel idea. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      heh, maybe those outlets are for the same "maintenance people" who plug their vacuum cleaners into my orange computer-only outlets and UPS sockets. Anyway, I say airports need to build a huge infrastructure of recharging/mobile use outlets since we are making them rich.

  139. Just yesterday by Jebediah21 · · Score: 1

    Our car broke down on a trip. For 4 hours we were in a little gas station / restaurant frequented by truckers and hunters. I found a booth with a power outlet and managed to charge my Gmini XS200 the entire time we were there. I think the complementary coffee cost them more. They more than made the money back on what we bought and it kept me happy.

    --

    Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
  140. No power hookups at my coffee place of choice by SGHarms · · Score: 1

    In Mountain View, CA's Dana Street Roasting Company the proprieters have the policy of free WiFi ... as long as your battery can support you. This hits a good balance between letting you read Boingboing with your latte -- and getting your seat uncovered so they can stay profitable.

    For a business to stay afloat they need to make a certain amount/per seat/per hour. If you order a water and sit for 10 hours, you're hurting their equation.

    Back in the New Economy, people used to come and sit at the cafe for hours on end and basically turn the limited number of seats into a mobile office. Very negative proposition.

    Nevertheless, customers should be able to work / chat on IM / etc. while enjoying the fine coffee-based beverages. Attracts more customers, attractive proposition.

    If every customer were to adhere to a drink / 90 minutes then sitting there all day would be fine. Ultimately it's a lot like the open source community, if you respect the resources in "the commons" and respect the ownership / need to buy food of those involved, everyone can exist in harmony.

    Hippie-tastically-yours

    steven

  141. Amenity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with the amenity concept, and see this as similar to the wifi hotspot concept.
    I actually had this happen. I was working on some Java code with another student in my graduate program and Baker's Square would not let us plug in his laptop. So we left and went to Perkins who did let us do it.
    It's pretty simple: Give me what I want/need and you will get my $$$.

  142. Is it legal to resell power??? by neilb78 · · Score: 0

    Aren't there some restrictions or regulations on the sale of power?

    --
    © 2004 The SCO Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    1. Re:Is it legal to resell power??? by LordEd · · Score: 1

      i don't know the legality of selling power, but there's nothing that says they can't charge you for the plug access.

  143. On Christmas day by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    I booked my family for a flight on Christmas Day on SouthWest Airlines from Orange County, CA to San Antonio, TX. (Xmas day is a great day to fly, BTW). At the airport a woman strung her Dell power cord from the flight attendents' booth across an aisle to her seat. The distance was roughly equal to the length of the cord, which meant the cord was suspended in mid-air as travellers with baggage and children struggled to find a place to wait for the plane.

    If only airports didn't ban weapons!

    That said, I myself am a heavy user of TMobile HotSpots and frequently will choose my lunch location based on proximity to a Starbucks. The second criteria is a place to plug in for power. Of course, I always ask first, but if power is not provided I, without raising so much as an eyebrow, go elsewhere. They don't want me, that's ok. I can deal with it.

    Speaking of leeching: anyone have the reg-free link?

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  144. Caltrain in Northern California has these too by alispguru · · Score: 1

    Not at all seats, though. Look for the cars with pairs of seats facing tables - there's an outlet underneath the table (which I didn't notice until my fourth ride during a recent visit).

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  145. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by GSloop · · Score: 1

    IIRC, a GFCI only detects that the circuit is getting ground from somewhere else other than the neutral. Thus, if you grab the hot leg and "real" ground, the GFCI will determine that current going "out" the hot isn't making a curcuit with the "neutral" and trip the circuit.

    However, if you take the hot and jam it in your mouth and the neutral and hold it in your hands the GFCI won't do jack and you're going to cook. It does not limit current like a fuse or breaker. It detects ground loops outside the hot/neutral circuit and stops them.

    A quick test I suppose would be this. Take a paper clip, and visit your nearest 3 prong GFCI outlet. Short the circut from hot to ground first. The GFCI will trip the circuit. (Do this test first, otherwise your hands will be to burned to complete this scientific experiement!)

    Now reset the circuit.

    Next, take the same paper clip and short from hot to ground. Your paper clip will heat up and spark very nicely, at least until the breaker/fuse stops the current.

    Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter. (yeah, it's probably misspelled too!)

    Cheers,
    Greg

  146. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by GSloop · · Score: 1

    Should have been...

    Next, take the same paper clip and short from hot to neutral. Your paper clip will heat up and spark very nicely, at least until the breaker/fuse stops the current.

  147. A Phenomenon in 2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a very funny piece on NPR by Andrei Codrescu about this phenomenon in 2002 called "'Vampires' at the Airport". It's in the Archives:

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?sto ry Id=860148

    (RealPlayer format only).

  148. Free power from JetBlue by MojoSF · · Score: 1
    I saw the nicest thing near the gate at the JetBlue terminal at JFK airport.

    The gates were arranged in a circle. In the center of the circle was a round platform with a ledge that could serve as a seat, and a circle of heavy-duty power outlets ringing the platform.

    The sign overhead mentioned the "Free Wi-Fi Hot Spot," too.

    As discount airlines go, JetBlue clearly knows when NOT to pinch pennies.

  149. Commodities like power, WiFi... by ScooterMX · · Score: 1

    Power, wifi acess, etc... seem like (eventually) would become commodities, part of the COGS of retail. I imagine that at one time the same was said of toilet paper. Starbucks made an issue of the toilet paper that they supply being of recycled materials, etc. And Like the guy in Wisconsin, they saw the value to the customer of having these things available to them for free. When you look at actual costs of things like wifi, or power access, etc., it makes pretty good business sense to absorb these things as a means of attracting customres to buy their ACTUAL products. Can you imagine Starbucks having a quarter machine on their restrooms? I think not. Many hotel chains have started offering wifi, and they are certainly getting guests as a result of it.

  150. Re: banana and cheese recipes. by Ajmuller · · Score: 1

    What kind of cheese?
    I mean this sounds like it might work with a good cheddar cheese. But it would probably suck with a gorgonzola or other sharp cheese.

  151. Power outlets in trains: At least16 years old news by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

    I don't know if the Danish IC3 train was the first train to have power outlets at passenger seats. But even the first units delivered in 1989 did have those, both on business and monkey class.

  152. UPS? Try charging your car battery in a bank by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

    I once did that. My car battery went out of power while doing some shopping. But I did have a battery charger and a 10 m cable in the car. Unfortunately, the only building within 10 meters was a bank (which I did not have any relations to). So I walked into the bank and asked if I could have some power for my car. No problem. I guess you could say I was being charged without being charged...

  153. etiquette by trb · · Score: 1
    In large part, the power seekers seem to negotiate their needs among themselves with cooperative grace, following a series of unspoken rules.

    Chief among them, some say, is never to use more than half of the sockets in a wall outlet. If an outlet provides four sockets, electrical etiquette dictates that you can plug in, say, your laptop and your cellphone, but not the iPod, too. Those who disregard this courtesy may find themselves the targets of grumblings and harsh stares.

    "It's better not to hog all the outlets, of course," said Zyphus Lebrun, a graduate student in journalism at Columbia University. "It's like when you go to the Laundromat and there is one person using four dryers."

    These power users carry $2k worth of toys to Starbucks, but they don't carry a $5 power strip. Genius.
  154. Unfortunately, some DO care by jangobongo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They don't bat an eye at helping yourself to serviettes or sugar...

    I've worked at and eaten in restaurants (mainly the fast food types) where they care a great deal about how many little packets you get/take. One place I worked for kept all the condiments behind the counter and customers had ask for them. The employees were given guidelines as to how many ketchup packets per order of french fries, etc., we could give out.

    Some of these place's profit margins are so small that every penny matters to them, unfortunately.

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  155. Living the stupidity by martyroesch · · Score: 1
    As I type this I'm sitting at gate C27 at DFW. All the outlets that I've spotted in my seating area are turned off, so I can't charge my laptop batteries or my ipod or my cell phone. Now, luckily I charged everything up at the hotel last night, but I've got my PowerBook screen dialed down to 4 pips to conserve battery power for my next (3 hour) leg and I'm not using my iPod as I sit here waiting on my 1.5 hour layover.

    What kind of braindead beancounter decided that this was a good idea? My "quality of life" in this terminal is being lowered because (as jlehtira pointed out above) they didn't want to pony up the $0.01 to let me avoid fun things like having to stare at my screen accreting photons and compulsively watching my battery meter slowly trickle down.

    Thank you DFW, thank you American Airlines, thank you for making my travel experience that much worse (let's not talk about the connection I missed last night because AA had us sitting on the tarmac for 45 minutes after landing waiting for a f'in gate!) because you wanted to save a penny. Of course, due to the high quality experience that I've had here I'll be flying United next time and buying that magazine, lunch and delicious java chip frappuccino in their Chicago, Denver or SFO hubs where you can plug into any goddamn wall outlet in the airport and it works.

    Hey, let's do some fun math. DFW handles about 5M passengers per month. Let's say 10% of them plug in to "leech" power and each one stays plugged in for an hour at .6 cents per hour per passenger. That's a whopping $36,000 per year lost to leeches!!!!! How will they possibly absorb that kind of cost with naught but $4 bottles of water and $7 ham sandwiches to serve as a basis for revenue in the terminals?

    Hey DFW, stick a fricken crowbar in your wallet and pony up, 100k+ mile fliers like myself are paying attention.

  156. VAMPIRES by scbomber · · Score: 1

    Andrei Codrescu wrote a really cute essay about this phenomenon in 2002; it was picked up for US National Public Radio's "All Things Considered" program.

    1. Re:VAMPIRES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er, sorry, audio is here.

  157. Re:what about the other leechers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems the truth would be that the sole purpose of women at a strip club is to provide sex. That is the reason the place exists, to turn people on with displays of sexually suggestive dancing, etc.

    The sole purpose of women at a strip club is to provide sex. Haven't been to one before?

  158. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by RevMike · · Score: 1

    It detects a ground fault, e.g. a short between the power and the ground in the plug. However if you were to touch a live wire and the ground is through you and down into the real ground it would NOT trip the GFCI. (Disclaimer: IANAE)

    Actually, that is quite wrong. Nearly all electrical power systems we encounter in our daily lives carry current in a two wire circuit. If everything is operating properly, the current in one wire will exactly equal the current flowing in the opposite direction in the other wire. The GFCI device constantly measures these two currents and compares them.

    If, however, any of that current finds an alternate path - perhaps through a hair dryer that has been dropped into a bath tub - the current in each wire will be different. This imbalance causes the GFCI device to trip. Note that if the current flows from one power conductor, through you, and back into the other power conductor, you will still be electrocuted.

  159. Re:Not really a problem, giving the billing struct by Nerd4News · · Score: 1

    Yea, I really get pissed when the theater doesn't have an outlet that I can plug my camcorder into.

  160. Re: banana and cheese recipes. by DeXtroMe · · Score: 1

    Cheddar is a sharp cheese. Guess that's what you get for trying to get all technical about cheeses... =P

  161. Exension Cords and Jell Cells by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    When I had a laptop (haven't replaced the last one since it got stolen), I'd pack it with one of those 6' extension cords with 3 plugs at the end. It provided two values:
    1: A longer reach... Between the extension cord and the laptop's cord, I could almost always find a seat 'close' enough at airports etc.
    2: No need to deal with the plug count rule. I can power one or two of my own units and still have room to feed someone else. If all the plugs are full, I can still often negotiate to stick my cord in the stack (and add a spare plug to the pool)

    Cell phones, on the other hand are an entirely different matter. Makers go so much for small size that you can barely get a full day's use out of their batteries if you do any talking. I solved that by hunting down a used battery, ripping it apart and putting in a voltage regulator and a long spiral cord. The other end gets a 12V car accessory plug that goes into a side carry pouch with a (5 pound) jell cell. With my old motorola analog cell phone, I calculated 2 days standy plus 8 hours talk time.

    Digital phones take so little power that I could probably go more than a week withoug recharging (I usually do nightly).

    However, I haven't even tried to take that kit on a flight since 9/11. They worried about my jeweler screwdriver, so I figure they'd have a coronary over a 5 pound X-ray proof (lead acid Jell cells) brick with wires sticking out of it.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  162. Re: banana and cheese recipes. by DjReagan · · Score: 1

    Cheddar is what I normally have with it. Though i've also used Edam and Jarlsberg in the past.

    --
    "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
  163. Re: banana and cheese recipes. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
    Most people are quite dubious about this recipe when they hear it, but just about everyone who tries tasting it really quite likes it.

    Bananas n' cheese, hmmm, now why do I suspect that this is a British innovation?

    --
    "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  164. probably by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 1


    the same as the difference between American 'English' and British 'English'.

  165. How I choose airports by Principal+Skinner · · Score: 1

    All other things being equal, yes, *IF* a geek has availed himself of this information before buying the ticket, AND the layover and total flight time are about the same, then BWI, which has his service, wins. But all other things rarely are equal. What percentage of the (not terribly big) population of Wi-Fi users will choose a laptop-friendly layover of 3 hours over a non-friendly 2-hour one? If your life is your blog and you need that time, you might take that longer layover, but a laptop user who just wants to kill time probably isn't going to use that as the key factor in how he flies.

    --
    one hundred twenty
    is just enough characters
    to write a haiku
  166. Rats! Now my secret 24x7coffeeshop gets slashdoted by Harodotus · · Score: 1

    (Grin) It's a sad day when I have to add worring about slashdot flashmobs hitting one of my favorate haunts...

    Hehe, actually i'm happy this came out here, if more people knew about places like this, the percieved demand would be greater and
    more 24x7 shops would open up all over the Silicon valley.

    --
    Its not users who are broken, it's systems not taking account their likely behaviour and fixing it technically.
  167. Re:Rats! Now my secret 24x7coffeeshop gets slashdo by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    I'll have to check the place out one of these days. ;)

  168. wtf? bbq! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deadly allergic reactions?! I hear that constantly, but have never... not fucking once... seen effects. If you're allergic, show me some hives, some irregular heartbeat, some labored breathing, nausea, fucking something! Watery eyes are not an effect, I get them too. Neither is the room feeling "stuffy".

    Instead, it's "excuse me, I'm allergic to cigarettes". "well, what do they do to you?" "They stink, and I, I, I...."

    It appears the symptoms are likely the result of the stick up your ass about other people's habits/ problems. Removeth the log from thine own eye to keep it from watering, beee-otch.