Slashdot Mirror


Exeem Open Beta Released

BrasOnMyGuitar writes "The file sharing application known as eXeem (made by the creators of the now-defunct file-sharing site SuprNova.org) has gone into public beta. The program is based on the BitTorrent protocol. However, it eliminates the need for trackers and decentralizes the user from the network. This allows for Kazaa-style searching with the speeds and benefits of the BitTorrent protocol." Reader Eeknay points out that Linux users can run it too.

394 comments

  1. First Thoughts by Klar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just downloaded the program, the interface is pretty p2p standard. When installing, It asks you to install an eXeem IE Toolbar, which I did not do.. Also, it seems to be having problems connecting to the network and searching for files. Hopefully it will be as widely used as suprnova was, and have some good download speeds. After several tries, I was able to connect to the network, and find a few files, but there were very few results, and only 1 seed on each of them. Since suprnova has been down, I've mostly just been using torrentspy. Anyone have an other recommendations for sites? I prefer just having web pages, so I don't have to run a separate client.

    1. Re:First Thoughts by surefooted1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mininova.org and Thepiratebay.com/org (I forgot sorry) Those are both good ones.

    2. Re:First Thoughts by mr.henry · · Score: 2, Informative

      I miss suprnova too. isoHunt is pretty decent.

    3. Re:First Thoughts by martok · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's unfortunate that they aren't opening this protocol as BitTorrent was. The nice thing about BitTorrent is the user can run it under any environment he chooses. From a gui windows program or as in my case, via btdownloadheadless/btlaunchmany on a headless fileserver.

      This seems like just another p2p app to me.

    4. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check this, dude

    5. Re:First Thoughts by XMyth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly.

      My fear is this may (possibly...) splinter the existing BT community. I'm sure the smarter, more tightly controlled ratio sites (IOW, the *good* ones) will not jump into this...hopefully their users will see the folly in doing such.

      If it comes down to that though, I'd rather see eXeem go away completely. As you said...it's just another p2p app.

    6. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.empornium.us
      maintain a ratio - you'll be fine.

    7. Re:First Thoughts by russint · · Score: 3, Informative

      The pirate bayFree for all, the worlds largest tracker.
      Torrentbytes, requires registration. Only new releases, great download speeds.
      Filelist, requires registration. Only new releases, great download speeds.
      Elitetorrents, requires registration. Only new releases, great download speeds.

      --
      ^^
    8. Re:First Thoughts by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Informative

      The world's largest P2P tracker was unharmed when MPAA went berserk and is at tracker.piratbyran.org.

      There's sometimes some web server hickups and they've done some maintenance recently.
      The server load increased a lot when Suprnova entered hide & seek mode.
      Just wait a while if it's down and it should be online again, with thousands of torrents and seeders. ;-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    9. Re:First Thoughts by scowling · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've read every post up to and includign yours, and I've seen none that advocate sharing infringing material.

      Knee, met jerk.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    10. Re:First Thoughts by kid-noodle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, so you didn't install the eXeem toolbar.

      But you did just install cydoor, kudos to them for actually rolling this, but I'm happy sticking with the alternatives until a version not spyware ridden appears.

      I'll repeat that, because it isn't made instantly clear (fairly clear, but not as clear as I'd like): eXeem will install cydoor, with no opt-out.

      --
      fortune -o
    11. Re:First Thoughts by rikkards · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except Mininova can't handle the load (yet) that they have received over the last week.
      I usually go between Piratebay and Loki Torrent

    12. Re:First Thoughts by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One has to wonder whether exeem will have the moderation of Suprnova.

      I mean, it's possible to have moderation in a decentralized system - it's just a lot harder. Probably the easiest way would be a torrent extention or file associated with a torrent that holds digitally signed ratings from the previous suprnova moderators. Each user can then have their own list of public keys of moderators that they consider trustworthy, and can share those lists directly with friends. Instead of just a rating, you could do a full metadata system.

      A much more complex, but more adaptable system, would be a full-featured self-organizing web of trust. But this would work in the meantime.

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    13. Re:First Thoughts by sewagemaster · · Score: 1
      Since suprnova has been down, I've mostly just been using torrentspy. Anyone have an other recommendations for sites? I prefer just having web pages, so I don't have to run a separate client.


      there's lokitorrent
      Eventhough the folks at lokitorrent have gotten a letter from the MPAA also, the site has continued to stay up.

      For TV episodes, there's btefnet (#bt efnet on irc) - the site's been great since tvtorrents have been down
    14. Re:First Thoughts by cg0def · · Score: 1

      eXeem uses BT as the underlining protocol so I have no idea what you're talking about. eXeem is a client that has adds features to BT because they don't like the current state of the protocol. If you ask me it's a pretty dumb idea because if they cared so much about doing good business they would have just contributed some man power to BT 2 and saved themselves the time to port their crappy little program later on. Oh well just another company that is after fast money in the computer industry. You'd think that people would learn from the dot com bubble.

    15. Re:First Thoughts by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      What hypocrisy?

    16. Re:First Thoughts by sjrstory · · Score: 1

      Another which has not been mentioned is Torrent Reactor

    17. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so you know, Lokitorrent (and I'm sure others) are being monitored by the BSA, (at least all the norton files are...)

    18. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    19. Re:First Thoughts by ssimontis · · Score: 1

      Wait...So you guys are getting all excited by new p2p applications made by pirates. Can't we all recognize that piracy is illegal? If you think you have some big excuse for not buying the software, don't buy the product. Sorry for ranting, its just that I expect this to be used for illegal purposes, and not for downloading Linux ISOs and other things.

      --
      Scott Simontis
    20. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FireFiles is a new site that lets most users upload torrents, so you get a very wide variety of stuff, including older torrents.

    21. Re:First Thoughts by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      In the last two weeks, I have downloaded Fedora Cord 3 and SuSE 9.2 using bittorrent. The main reasons is because I can start the download and forget it for a few days and it helps others get it as well.

      I have always advocated bittorrent as a new method for distributing patches for games, since they are generally very large. This should be built into the game itself.

      There are also lots of really good music that the musicians encourage people to access via bittorrent and other P2P.

      Yes, I am sure the majority of traffic is illegal, but there are plenty of valid and legal reasons for using bittorrent as well.

      And no, no one here is getting excited about it. It appears to contain spywear, is closed source and proprietary while using an open source protocol. I don't see this a a worthwhile product, since there is no shortage of tracker servers for anything I want to download, and setting up a tracking server is trivial.

      But it is still news.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    22. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not real important in itself, I would expect this to install spyware. The question is... once I remove that stuff with spybot, does Exeem still function?

    23. Re:First Thoughts by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why I do not install any closed source software anymore (with a few exceptions ... I will install games ported by Loki ... but only with user level permissions in their own user account).

    24. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.. the troll got "Insightful" and the guy correcting the troll got "Troll."

    25. Re:First Thoughts by Algan · · Score: 1

      The question is... once I remove that stuff with spybot, does Exeem still function?

      Yes, I just checked that indeed it does :)

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    26. Re:First Thoughts by zootm · · Score: 1

      I heard another place that it may reinstall the CyDoor system when it starts if it has been previously removed. Worth checking.

    27. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can't we all recognize that piracy is illegal?

      No, it's much easier to recognize that the piracy is here to stay. You can't fight the human nature.

    28. Re:First Thoughts by hobo2k · · Score: 3, Informative
      In fact disabling eXeem's spyware is a breech of contract. From the EULA:
      6.5 In exchange for downloading the Software at no cost, you expressly agree that you accept the Embedded Third Party Software and that so long as you have not entirely deleted the Software from your computer you will not take any action, including downloading other software which modifies, is intended to modify or permits others to modify registry or other settings on your computer to, disable, remove, block, prevent the functioning of, or otherwise interfere with any of the Embedded Third Party Software.
      I'm not saying that this should surprise anyone. Kazaa is well known for its spyware and eXeem is positioning itself as a Kazaa replacement. For most users the free (as in no money) access to large amounts of copyrighted content is ample compensation for having their machine rooted by a company which wants to make money off their personal info. The hidden cost of being 0wned by cydoor is much less than the obvious cost of actually buying the CDs or DVDs that you want to enjoy.

      whoops, there goes my "excellent" karma.

    29. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      eXeem uses BT as the underlining protocol so I have no idea what you're talking about. eXeem is a client that has adds features to BT because they don't like the current state of the protocol.
      I agree with them, I always thought it was stupid that BT supported subdirectories and had efficient, relatively quick error correction. Thank god we have Exeem to fix these problems.
    30. Re:First Thoughts by carninja · · Score: 0

      From the way they emphasized that they have no control over what is shared in the eXeem FAQ, I find it unlikely that any moderation will be enforced, aside from the 1MB minimum file size. Although legal action by the RIAA/MPAA could initiate some sort of modding.

    31. Re:First Thoughts by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Indeed it does. It reinstalls Cydoor each time you run Exeem. No way I'm even touching this until a hacked version is released. ;-) They threatened with bans if you used a hacked one, but that's a risk I'm willing to take. :-) It's not like alternatives like The Pirate Bay doesn't exist after all.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    32. Re:First Thoughts by trotski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anyone have an other recommendations for sites?

      Yes - bi-torrent.com.

      It's just like suprnova, enjoy!

      --

      "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    33. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arr, there be no law 'pon the high seas!

      Seriously, people calling copyright infringement 'piracy' really bug me. Violating a legal monopoly is not the same as attacking ships and plundering their cargo.

    34. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ugh ... you are actually pointing about what may breech the EULA of a program that people will use to pirate other programs?

    35. Re:First Thoughts by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Exeem Lite coming soon

    36. Re:First Thoughts by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Poor americans, cd levies are great, you should have had one, then you wouldn't have this issue. :)

    37. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you would. It's just as illegal to share files in Canadanadia and everywhere else as it is in the US.... It's just that in those countires that it's almost okay to downlaod then burn--but the record people will try and have it both ways... The levies, and burning punishible by a firm spanking... Mark my word!

    38. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll see how it stands up in court. Canadian judges aren't often caught jerking off on the bench, like those fools down south.

    39. Re:First Thoughts by Moonshadow · · Score: 1
      Go go gadget Spybot S&D!.

      Installed eXeem, ran SS&D, nuked Cydoor, and all is happy again. :)

    40. Re:First Thoughts by friedmud · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that in the webcast from the main exeem developer he mentioned something about being able to rate torrents directly in the interface... this way bad torrents get pushed out of the system quickly... I don't know if it's implemented yet, but it sounds like a good idea to me.

      Friedmud

    41. Re:First Thoughts by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Now that I've downloaded it and tried it out I can say that there are a couple of (really neat!) ways to rate torrents.

      Firstly.. after you download a file you can right click on it and "Vote OK" or "Vote NOT OK". It collects the percentage of OKs and displays that as a rating next to the file while you are browsing around.

      Next there is also an awesome built in commenting system. You can leave your comments on a file and you can also view all comments made about that file... very interesting indeed!

      So using these two methods it should be pretty easy to weed out bad torrents....

      Friedmud

    42. Re:First Thoughts by Rei · · Score: 1

      Now, realistically how can that work? P2P moderation systems are a really complex issue; stopping clients from dropping data that they don't like (or blocking votes), syncing the metadata between nodes (including ones that may be offline at a given time), discarding data when it become superfluous without making it seem like suspect activity, etc isn't easy.

      My bet is that they're betting on no one implementing a 3rd party client, to protect them from malicious clients. I doubt that will last if Exeem does.

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    43. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It reinstalls it when exeem starts up again.

    44. Re:First Thoughts by necro2607 · · Score: 1

      Funny, if it's that large you'd think I would have heard of it by now, seeing as how I've heard of and used far less-known P2P/file-sharing software like Hotline, Carracho and KDX...

    45. Re:First Thoughts by DarkMantle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My favorite sites.....
      http://www.lokitorrent.com/ - Requires Free Reg, I've got no spam from this (yet.)
      http://www.bi-torrent.com/index.htm - Was a suprnova.org mirror, now is laid out similar (categories and such) to suprnova.
      http://www.isohunt.com/ - classic from the days of IRC, still searches IRC as well
      http://www.packetnews.com - another from IRC, does both IRC and torrent now.
      http://www.torrentreactor.net/index.php - Been using it for a while. Pretty complete list of things available.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    46. Re:First Thoughts by Roosta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I maintain a list of bittorrent sites here w.torrentland.co.uk. Apologies for the bad site design, it's in the process of being improved at the mo.

      --
      -- Simon Key
    47. Re:First Thoughts by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Ummmm ok.

      The thing is why would a third party client want to do away with those features? For me those features are two of the reasons to use Exeeem in the first place... stipping them out would make me not use Exeem.

      As it is right now those two feautres work well... I'm sure they've thought about the complexities of doing a distributed commenting and voting system... they seem to have thought about everything else.

      I'm still looking for reasons why this app isn't the one I'm going to use. I would really like to say "Eh, it's not an open protocol so I'm not going to use it" but fact of the matter is that Exeem (atleast right now) really does work.... so I'm probably going to use it.

      Friedmud

    48. Re:First Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about Carracho, but Hotline and KDX aren't P2P in any sense.

    49. Re:First Thoughts by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      No, but they were a huge part of the old school warez scene. Especially Hotline. Heh. The memories...

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    50. Re:First Thoughts by Rei · · Score: 1

      A 3rd party wouldn't do away with them; it would abuse them. Malware, porn, and virus peddlers are famous for messing with clients to try and get their pitch heard far and wide. They'd love to toss any negative moderation about their content.

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    51. Re:First Thoughts by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

      rofl... settings eh? well maybe a hex hack will do the trick! ha! yes! just hex hack the forst 5 lines to 00 within cydoor and it becomes non-operational!!! and it doesnt circomvent the EULA!!! OWNED!!!! F__K YOU SLONEK!

      --
      Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  2. Michael by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    what is your paypal address? I wrote this kool new program that I want you to put on the front page. Look forward to doing business with you! Thanks!

    1. Re:Michael by Angband's+Bane · · Score: 1

      Don't be jealous that he's been chatting online with babes all day. -Ang

    2. Re:Michael by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Exeem has been mentioned on Slashdot before. It's the sucessor to the largest BitTorrent site on the internet. A followup is certainly in order.

    3. Re:Michael by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      And in previous mentions it was revealed that it was not made by the SuprNova crew, as it was stated in this inaccurate blurb. It is just promoted by the ex-owner of SuprNova.

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    4. Re:Michael by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far it's been said that: Exeem installs spyware on your computer, It is closed source and you can't know what's happening behind, The web site stinks the RIAA all over the place (look at the pretty pictures and the big "Download Me" button).

      I say: don't download, don't touch it, don't use it.

    5. Re:Michael by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

      eXeem is far from a succesor to the 'largest BitTorrent site on the Internet'.

      First of all, i challenge the notion 'largest BitTorrent site on the Internet'. I think there are other websites which generate a lot of BitTorrent traffic albeit closed communities, or only counting original content (own trackers, or initialized for *that* community), or only counting legal content (e.g. lossless audio).

      That aside, its only a beta as we speak. With only like, 200 active test persons from what i read in this thread. At least, nothing near the original counts of Suprnova.org.

      Suprnova.org was build on the open source, MIT licensed BitTorrent technology which was open and fully specified. It ran because of donations (money, servers, bandwidth) and ads on the website. BitTorrent ran on a Solaris machine through Python. BitTorrent ran on an IRIX machine through Python. BitTorrent ran on Windows using Java. C clients were available (i know -- i ran all on previously mentioned platforms except the C implementations, those on Linux only). BitTorrent was (and still is) *very* portable.

      Compare that to eXeem which only runs on Windows and through WINE ("runs on Linux Slashdot? Yeah right. Not using my shell, and not on my SPARC for sure!) and is nothing of a succesor at all in the sense that its from the same developers. The corporation behind eXeem, who are trying to earn money through spyware/adware and tight-controlled proprietary software, are merely lifting on the popularity of Suprnova.org.

      Its a piece of junk. About the only thing i might come up with, is that its convenient to use and more decentralized than BitTorrent; its not anonymous though, nor does this mean other initiatives can't catch up regarding convenience. So i'd say: case closed. Next! -- Next indeed; instead of reporting on eXeem, Slashdot would do good by ignoring the piece of junk instead. There are a number of much more _innovative_, _radical_, _interesting_ and _open_ initiatives developed as we speak. For example, there's one which tries to be more scalable than BitTorrent is, but its also open and allows the metadata to be transfered in a FTP-like way (using URI scheme's users may chose). There's also a new layer between those 'ride' server-programs and the 'tracker'.

      --
      WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
    6. Re:Michael by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Not just promoted, his involvement goes deeper than that. There are reasons for the great many similarities between eXeem and Suprnova that I don't think would have been there otherwise.

      Besides, it's not like this was a spur of the moment thing. When I was running Novasearch, I was told (And this was a few months before even the closed beta for eXeem started) that an application-based replacement for Supnova was in the works.

      I think it more likely that Suprnova actively sought out such a partnership. What does it matter if Suprnova themselves developped the application, so long as they use it as their official transition path? They decided this is the route they wanted to go, and found somebody to take them there.

    7. Re:Michael by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Spyware? Hardly. It installs adware, which is an entirely different thing. Cydoor, the ad provider, is solely designed to download ads and display them in the program. And above all, it ONLY RUNS when the host app (eXeem) is running.

      And this is information I got from Symantec, totally backing up what Sloncek has said about Cydoor and eXeem.

      http://sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/adware.cydoor .h tml

      Cydoor was used to provide ads to the Suprnova website for months. Now they're using the company to provide ads for their program.

      Besides, something being closed source isn't a valid reason to trash something. The opensource philosophy, while a great thing, doesn't work everywhere. People should be able to get paid for their hard work if they so choose.

      I'm not sure what you mean by "stinks the RIAA all over the place". Do you mean that they will attract the RIAA's attention? I'm sure they will. But their location in the caribbean is likely to protect them from that.

    8. Re:Michael by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Suprnova got over a million pageviews per day. There are not many websites in general that are that large, let alone BitTorrent websites. At it's peak it was nearly the 500th biggest website on the net (According to Alexa). It's fair to say it was likely the most popular BitTorrent site by an enormous margin.

      As we speak, it is indeed a beta, but a public one with hundreds of thousands of users. eXeem seems to follow the Kazaa concept in which you can't see every user out there (Correct me if I'm wrong), but my machine has seen upwards of 40 to 60 thousand near me in the eXeem network.

      Suprnova was just as closed source. They didn't release any of their (PHP) source. Nobody complained. Technically, Exeem, being based on LibTorrent, is based on open sourced code just the same.

      Is eXeem trying to ride off the popularity of Suprnova? Perhaps. I'm of the opinion that Suprnova went looking for such a company before they were approached. While I was running Novasearch I heard months before the public beta started that Suprnova was looking into an application-based replacement for Suprnova.

      Opensource isn't the end-all be-all of software, no matter what RMS would have you believe. Closed software has it's place, and isn't going anywhere anytime soon. People deserve to get paid for their hard work, and if they want to donate code in their free time, great.

    9. Re:Michael by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, something being closed source isn't a valid reason to trash something.

      Of course it is. So is being open source. So is having an orange (or red or blue or green) color scheme. Or being command line based. Or being GUI based. Or having a silly name. Or ANYTHING else you don't like. "Trashing" things is all about opinion.

    10. Re:Michael by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Closed software has it's place, and isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

      But not in p2p software.

      a. It creates a single point of control, which WILL ve attacked in a variety of ways if it's successful. Yes that includes international pressure on wherever it is they're located to get them closed down.

      b. It enables scum (who are already using spyware) network access to your machine. Insane.

      People deserve to get paid for their hard work

      c. The vast majority of p2p users don't care about people getting paid for their hard work, you IDIOT. What is the target market of this supposed to be?

    11. Re:Michael by NetNifty · · Score: 1

      "Suprnova was just as closed source. They didn't release any of their (PHP) source. Nobody complained."

      Probably because suprnova was a web page and as such isn't going to be running code on my machine with access to all my files (on windows at least, well in admin user anyway) and has a far less potential to infect my machine with spyware (I use firefox, which although may not be completely secure in practice, I trust it more than a piece of software which includes advertisements from a known spyware company).

    12. Re:Michael by gurumeditationerror · · Score: 1

      Well said!

  3. Privacy of the person sharing? by surefooted1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How well does it protect the person sharing or seeding the file?

    1. Re:Privacy of the person sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Since it's still bittorrent, It doesn't protect the person /at all./

    2. Re:Privacy of the person sharing? by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Maybe when Safepeer or something like it is available........

      The security/anonymous ability is something people need in the "next gen" of filesharing.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    3. Re:Privacy of the person sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's the key- I've found nothing in their documentation that talks about that...

    4. Re:Privacy of the person sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      my first point is p2p in no way will ever be competely safe from tracking. first you need to know who to ask. seccond you need to send the data some where. the only way to protect yourself is to make a data haven that will route all traffic through and remove all identity info. but then why not just host the content in the data haven. unless you use the data haven for a cache that will kepp copys of the most popular content. now that would cost a lot for one person or people would have to pay to maintain that cache server unless you use the kast network. its protection is the deniability, you auto forward any thing you receive so you could say i did not know what was on this channel or i delete it if it is copyrighted and it did not start here. but that is a week defense. also one program called ant sent info through all sorts of relays (other users of the network) but that seriously cuts bandwith and so would any protected p2p. my seccond point is now what is the difference between this and any other popular p2p client kazaa, winmx. unless i dont know something.

    5. Re:Privacy of the person sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      actually that isn't true. There are ways, they just tend to have excessive costs. Take for example the following. The idea would be the sender and the reciever never communicate dirrectly and the reciever only identifies itself with a disposable (probably random) identifier. Then all the intermidate nodes seperating the sender and reciever would simple look at a packet (also probably encrypted but thats a whole other story) and say 'well thats not *my* current random disposable ID' and then pass it on to the next node. Leaving it up to the reciever to pluck the data it wants. This is based on the idea used by the French resistance in WW2 (and others) that you can't be made to devuldge the identities of people you don't know. The obvious downside of the system described above is it would KILL bandwidth... even if there were some way to keep the number of intermidiate links between sender and reciever small the number of extra packets sent for each actual packet of data communicated between the sender and reciever would be HUGE. Which is why I never bothered to code what I just described ;)

    6. Re:Privacy of the person sharing? by Rei · · Score: 1

      Not true. There are two good ways to do it: Spoofing and proxying. I am currently working on a spoofying system, although it's still in its early stages. Both incur costs.

      Spoofing incurs no bandwidth cost, but can have several downsides:

      1) Portability: The underlying way to deal with raw and promiscuous sockets varies from OS to OS. I'm using libnet and libpcap to help alleviate this problem.

      2) Complexity: There's a lot of work to a good spoofing system, just because networks vary so much. Some people are behind hubs. Some people are behind switches. Some people are behind NAT. Some people's switches are resistant to being put into promiscuous mode by ARP attacks; some people's aren't. Cache poisoning can work to varying degrees. Some people's routers will carefully examine the source of packets coming through them; other's won't. Etc. In an optimal situation, you can send data from one fake IP and mac addr to another fake IP and mac addr, and still have it arrive. In a worst case situation, you can't do any of it.

      3) User pains: All of that complexity and the technical nature of a lot of it means that it would be a lot of work for your average user to configure. Consequently, I'm going to have to try to make it autodetect as much as possible. That adds a lot more programming complexity.

      Proxying has one major problem: the bandwidth cost. And people don't like having their bandwidth eaten for someone else's transfer.

      Of course, to receive the benefits of anonymity, not everything needs to be spoofed, and not everything needs to be proxied; you just need a *significant percentage* of total traffic to be spoofed/proxied, and there to be no apparent difference between real and spoofed or proxied traffic.

      --
      What the hells goin on in the engine room? Were there monkeys? Some terrifying space monkeys maybe got loose?
    7. Re:Privacy of the person sharing? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      It's closed source, so hard to know from an independent/unbiased analysis. :-p

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    8. Re:Privacy of the person sharing? by karstux · · Score: 1

      There is actually a quite practical way for anonymous, secure p2p filesharing - Freenet and Frost.

      The Freenet system is designed to be completely decentralized, and it should be nigh impossible to track data paths over the nodes - no one knows which node originally requested the information, and the requesting node doesn't know where it's coming from. Also, all communications between the freenodes are encrypted, and everything in a freenode is stored in encrypted form as well. The owner of a freenode has no way of knowing what's stored in it.

      All parts of the system are open-source and thus can be reviewed and trusted, unlike this eXeem garbage. As a bonus, it's written in Java and runs on a variety of platforms.

      Finally, as you may have guessed by now - the system is slow as molasses flowing uphill in winter. Also, the freenode should best be running 24/7, which certainly is impractical for most.

      But secure, anonymous filesharing is possible, today, with existing software.

      --
      Don't whistle while you're pissing.
  4. Usage by Vandil+X · · Score: 5, Funny

    And of course, eXeem will be used exclusively for the mass distribution of Free, Open Source, GNU, and GPL'd software.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:Usage by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      using Cydoor adware..... Yes. The world makes sense now

    2. Re:Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well ofcourse, we all know that Slashdot only covers legal material...

    3. Re:Usage by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      Well, you have the free right.

    4. Re:Usage by RonnyJ · · Score: 1
      To be fair, the site associated with this program, Suprnova, catalogued a variety of torrents, some legal, others not so legal.

      Having said that, doing a search for 'linux' on eXeem only turned up one file, an unofficial guide to getting eXeem to run on Linux (presumably through WINE).

    5. Re:Usage by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      It is real pity that this p2p application is not open source. Without it being open source there is no way to know if something installs spyware or whatever else and no way to port the software to other OSs, for it to be inspected for security issues, and so on. As such, this is of little use for those who want to use something that gives them free software freedom (as in free speech).

    6. Re:Usage by yarbo · · Score: 1

      That place is still around?

    7. Re:Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without it being open source there is no way to know if something installs spyware

      Yes, there is. This eXeem is known to install spyware (Cydoor). I agree though that if it didn't install spyware then there'd be no way to know it for sure.

  5. Well... by Neophytus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It now does nothing really that new, apart from using the bittorrent protocol. Networks like the long lost WinMX have supported downloading from users with partially downloaded for years now.

    I guess it just saves the client from searching for the peers itself, leaving that job to the supernodes.

    1. Re:Well... by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

      Hey! WinMX is NOT long lost, you can find almost anything you need there (if it's a song of course), and I use it regularly.

    2. Re:Well... by Neophytus · · Score: 1

      Long lost, not long defunct. I remember it loosing out to a lot of people in the KaZaA mainia of 2003...

    3. Re:Well... by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I always found WinMX to be better than Kazaa for music because they didn't have nearly as many fake songs. I guess there was a benefit to being less popular. It also made them less of a target. I hope the recording industry doesn't visit Slashdot.

    4. Re:Well... by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      winmx still lives, last beta was released on the 13 of dec http://www.winmx.com/beta/beta354.html

      lots of people still on it, can find pretty much any somewhat popular track. Thats all i use it for so not sure how well movies and the like are found.

      Frontcode is very slow with updates but they do come eventually.

    5. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WinMX has the problem that the majority of users use monitor software to block leechers.

      That's fine in principle, but they tend to define a "leecher" as anyone who is not sharing at least 100,000 files and uploading to 500 people simultaneously. People like me (only 100-odd files to share, only uploading to 2 or 3 people at a time) tend to spend days sitting in queues, gradually getting towards the front, only to be booted by a dumb monitor program as soon as our turn comes to download.

      It's irritating because the download speeds are so good when you get a download. I average 5 kb/s download on eMule, and 50 kb/s on WinMX. But I still get files faster from eMule, because the users are less paranoid about leeching.

  6. Well folks by Primotech · · Score: 0

    It's the beginning of a new age for Bitorrent. Or the beginning of the end. We soon shall see.

  7. eXeem lite... by KhalidBoussouara · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...has already been released.

    eXeem Lite

    1. Re:eXeem lite... by mboverload · · Score: 1

      That is not the latest version, however.

    2. Re:eXeem lite... by LoneGunner · · Score: 1

      But it still works great... for now.

    3. Re:eXeem lite... by davron05 · · Score: 1

      Right now (Jan 21, 10pm GMT) the eXeem Lite site only allows to download a lite version of the eXeem Lite Beta Tester 0.18 version, i.e. the version intended for private testing only. If you install it, it will ask for the betatester's code.

      But according to this post we can expect a "lite" version of the recently released eXeem 0.20 to be available within a day. At least that is what the authors claim.

    4. Re:eXeem lite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A key is not necessary, just close the window that appears and asks for it.

    5. Re:eXeem lite... by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      Hanging out in the exlite irc channel and the admin just notified us that .20 is not hard to crack and will be out "soon"

  8. Spyware by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does it contain spyware ala Kazaa? I sure won't install it until I seen the source, eXeem being affiliated with Suprnova.org which was.... well, hosting tons of illegal .torrents?

    1. Re:Spyware by Bungopolis · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to the eXeem Lite FAQ eXeem does contain spyware.

    2. Re:Spyware by GweeDo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually according to the eXeem Lite FAQ eXeem Lite doesn't contain spyware. No were in the FAQ do they actually say that eXeem does.

    3. Re:Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does. Read the last line.

    4. Re:Spyware by NetNifty · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yup, says here that they use Cydoor, and a quick google pretty much confirms that it's spyware, or that company uses spyware at least, and hence shouldn't be trusted.

    5. Re:Spyware by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Well, I say that eXeem contains a 4-leaf clover and 2 bottles of peanut oil, but that doesn't mean it's true.

      The Exeem Lite faq says:

      2. Does eXlite contain spyware?
      eXlite was sorely made to take out the spyware from eXeem so to make it clear eXlite does not contain spyware.


      Are there any details here?

    6. Re:Spyware by Caine · · Score: 4, Informative
      You say the FAQ doesn't claim eXeem has spyware?


      11. What is the official eXeem website? Return
      the eXeem website is located here, but the official eXeem client does contain spyware!

      ...I rest my case.

    7. Re:Spyware by zargag · · Score: 1

      It has the Cydoor adware package. Antispyware removed it and Exeem seems to run fine...

    8. Re:Spyware by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected :)

    9. Re:Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cydoor does not clean very nicely most of the time. Perhaps the antispyware has improved since then, I've been using FF and havn't had any spyware to test for quite awhile.

    10. Re:Spyware by crummynz · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey! You graciously admitted defeat! What kind of slashdotter are you!?

      --
      ~ Crummy
    11. Re:Spyware by ryusen · · Score: 1

      yeah! [/obligatory "me too" post]

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    12. Re:Spyware by RichardX · · Score: 1

      "Exteem" and "Exteem Lite" are two different things.
      Exteem DOES contain spyware.
      Exteem Lite has the spyware ripped out.

      Hence you are 100% correct when you say "Exteem lite does not contain spyware", and the parent is correct in saying that Exteem does.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    13. Re:Spyware by idlemachine · · Score: 1
      The question is: what makes the eXeem Lite guys any more trustworthy than the eXeem developers?

      How do we know eXeem Lite doesn't contain its own spyware? Because of the "Lite" in its name?

      This seems too much like someone playing off the Kazaa/Kazaa-Lite mindshare to position their software exactly where they want it to be.

    14. Re:Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So start up Exeem again and then check again for Spyware. Surpise! It's back!

    15. Re:Spyware by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      " "Exteem" and "Exteem Lite" are two different things."

      Now, if you would kindly explain to use what the fuck Exteem us, we would all be greatly appreciative.

      The rest of us have been discussing some new shitty p2p app called Exeem.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    16. Re:Spyware by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Wow, don't throw your toys out of the pram!
      Yeah, for some reason I called it "exteem" instead of "exeem" (or "eXeem" if you insist) - no idea why, as I know it's correct name, but that's what I get for posting in the middle of the night. Either way, my point remains the same.

      I had a look through some of your recently posted messages to see whether you have a generally hostile disposition, or if I got special treatment. I didn't. Every other post of yours is some kind of flame, cheap shot, or criticism, most of which contribute nothing useful to the topic at hand. It's a shame, really. It's people like you who are lowering the general tone of Slashdot, and making it an increasingly less friendly place to be.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    17. Re:Spyware by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Hence you are 100% correct when you say "Exteem lite does not contain spyware", and the parent is correct in saying that Exteem does.

      I never said that "Exteem lite does not contain spyware".

      I'm asking the authors of Exceem lite to provide proof that Exceem has spyware. They don't back up their claim or provide details, which is dissapointing.

      I don't trust everything I read.

  9. Slashdotted already? by jtapper · · Score: 1

    I made it to the main page and clicked on the download button and I just get a blank page.

    Is there a mirror kicking around or a *cough* torrent *cough* to download this?

    --
    Got a site/story worth sharing? Leave a mark
    1. Re:Slashdotted already? by UID1000000 · · Score: 1

      If there is please post it here:
      http://f.moya.scarywater.net/
      BitTorrent Files for Slashdot Effect Victims

      --
      UID 1000000 is just around the corner.

  10. Here's the download by Aggrajag · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://download.exeem.com/exeem.htm

    1. Re:Here's the download by Alan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdotted for me :( Anyone got a .torrent of the file?

      Too bad that the exeem site is so graphics heavy, they should have put up the text only version for slashdot :)

    2. Re:Here's the download by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

      http://tracker.piratbyran.org/download.php/3280073 /eXeem0.20.exe.torrent

    3. Re:Here's the download by dourk · · Score: 1

      http://www.lokitorrent.com/download.php?id=104593

      --
      Wake up.
  11. No native binaries for Linux by Slayer_X · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually the client runs with the help of wine, I prefer native binaries :/

    --
    - Slayer_X
    http://www.slayerx.org/
    Lima
    1. Re:No native binaries for Linux by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Actually the client runs with the help of wine, I prefer native binaries :/

      Not just native binaries but how about a CLI? Not all of us have X on the machine we p2p from.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:No native binaries for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But with wine, you don't have to worry about it including spyware...since it can't _really_ spy on you inside of wine?

    3. Re:No native binaries for Linux by rhennigan · · Score: 1

      According to the site, they will be developing a Linux client as soon as exeem is out of beta. By then, hopefully the network will have really taken off with plenty of files. I guess I don't really mind waiting in that case.

    4. Re:No native binaries for Linux by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      As long as it has a CLI/curses version, because I've been doing all my torrent-ing on a little linux "grunt" box that runs btlaunchmanycurses.py under screen, so it just scans for new .torrents I drag into my home folder, and I check up on it by ssh'ing in.

      I want to keep this setup because I can drop a .torrent in, or check up on it, from anywhere. I'll find, say, a knoppix torrent at noon at work, ftp it up to my box at home, and by the time I get home, it's there waiting for me.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:No native binaries for Linux by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Heck, since you're using python, why not have it intreface with a webservice on your webserver, get the torrent uri, investigate, and report findings (d/l, 404, etc) back to the webservice, to which you could hack together a web interface, so you don't have to ftp and ssh nothing, just launch your firefox, log in to your site, submit the uri, and mosey on your business.

      Of course, I don't really want people to realize just how very brain dead it is to use python with old machines, since I "rescue" old boxes from fed up windows XP people who can't operate on less than P4 3.0 256MB. :)

      Of course, that would be too easy, as then you could have a py prog on usb drive, and cli the torrent uri from anywhere...

      Them wheels are a'spinning.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    6. Re:No native binaries for Linux by paranoidgeek · · Score: 1

      I prefer source.

      That way i can run it on what ever arch takes my fancy ( Not to mention it would allow me/others to write CLI versions of it ).

      --
      Lima India November Uniform X-ray
  12. Yay RIAA! by Alan · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's nice to see that the taking down of sites and services such as napster and suprnova has stopped piracy in it's tracks!

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Mini Review by bgreg03 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As the guy above said, when you first open this program, it appears to be a very normal p2p program, like kazaa and ares. The ability to create your own 'torrents' is what will really set this service apart. Some of the downsides of the other p2p applications (including bittorrent apps) was the inability of the layman user to contribute and share things new and unique. I personally think you will see this take off VERY quickly, and will be the next level of p2p. Lets see how this turns out.

    1. Re:Mini Review by grub · · Score: 1


      he ability to create your own 'torrents' is what will really set this service apart.

      Azureus, a Java BitTorrent client, makes it a snap for the user to create torrents.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Mini Review by aero2600-5 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "The ability to create your own 'torrents' is what will really set this service apart. Some of the downsides of the other p2p applications (including bittorrent apps) was the inability of the layman user to contribute and share things new and unique."

      I'm sure this has never occurred to you, but do you think it's possible that not allowing the average user to create their own torrents might be a good thing? Really, do I want to sift through 20 different torrents for the most recent episode of The Daily show because some boobs downloaded it from Loki and wanted to be the first to post it on Exeem? The reason why Suprnova.org was so great was that just about every torrent, unless posted by a regular submitter, was checked before making it onto the front page. Having people download from 20 different torrents instead of just one completely defeats the purpose of swarmed downloading.

      I think Exeem will quickly turn into another Kazaa, except slightly better. It'll wind up being full of garbage just like Kazaa. I hope I'm wrong, but that's what will happen when you let anyone submit anything they want.

      And before someone tries to lecture me on the comment system built into Exeem, and how it'll prevent all of these problems, it won't. For anyone looking for an example, the second most seeded file on Exeem at the moment is called 'Barbie web cam sexe.mpeg' It has 102 seeds, a rating of 81.6%, yet all of the comments say it's stupid and not worth the bandwidth. I'm glad the comment system is getting rid of all those worthless downloads.

      I'll stick to the real BitTorrent, open-source and spyware-free, and I'll just continue to support the sites that aren't willing to cave like suprnova.org.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    3. Re:Mini Review by UID1000000 · · Score: 1

      yes azureus is a very nice client to use. I find it's processor heavy though so if you are using a notebook - make sure that it's plugged in.

      grandparent obviously hasn't heard of it yet or is karma whoring.

      --
      UID 1000000 is just around the corner.

    4. Re:Mini Review by zenon3 · · Score: 1

      I actually see this the other way around. With so few people creating torrents, the traffic was concentrated to the few good trackers. This helped speed and more importantly, quality control. This is going to be just like all the other p2p apps with a billion versions of the same file, only slightly different or varying qualities.

    5. Re:Mini Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      voting karma whore
      also voting cheesegod

    6. Re:Mini Review by danila · · Score: 1

      The ability to create your own 'torrents' was present in pretty fucking much every P2P application. BitTorrent was the only example of retarded programming by that idiot Cohen, which doesn't have this ability.

      To release a file in KaZaA, eDonkey, DC, WinMX, SoulSeek, even original Napster, you just include the folder in the list of shared folders. Most applications offer to search your disk and automatically share media files.

      This ability will no more set this service apart than the ability to maximize and minimize the application window. Next level of P2P my ass! What a moron.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    7. Re:Mini Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The ability to create your own 'torrents' was present in pretty fucking much every P2P application. BitTorrent was the only example of retarded programming by that idiot Cohen, which doesn't have this ability."

      I think your being a bit harsh. Bittorent is meant to be a bit more selective than sharing your entire mp3 download directory. Its designed to make sharing big files easier.

    8. Re:Mini Review by danila · · Score: 1

      You're right, I was too harsh. But while what you are saying is indeed a clear advantage of BT, it's very different from what the GP was saying. BT has the flash crowd effect, where smart uploading allows much faster distribution of new files - "oversaturating" the network with the file. eDonkey (and eMule) are less effective at this. But it should be noted that 200-600 Mb files are still released on eDonkey quite well. But to say that it wasn't possible to release a file on other networks is simply not true. If a file is popular, it spreads anywhere, be it BitTorrent or KaZaA.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    9. Re:Mini Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure to use Java 1.5. It's help azureus a fair bit on linux. If you go to downloads on java's page it'll still link you to 1.42. Search for it and you 'll find 1.5 at java.com

  15. Re:Woohoo by Bungopolis · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the FAQ:

    14. Is eXeem(TM) open source?
    No, eXeem(TM) is not open source.

  16. In other news... by b374 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Reader Eeknay points out that Linux users can run it too.
    Reader b374 points out that Linux users can run Notepad using Wine too... (let's see how fast someone points out that it should be GNU/Linux :) )
  17. Webserver down... by jcostantino · · Score: 0, Redundant
    ...can someone post a .torrent?


    (Seriously)

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    1. Re:Webserver down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use exeem to download it... oh wait...

  18. Re:Woohoo by chris09876 · · Score: 1

    ...and I know this isn't an open source application, but it's only a matter of time. (Sorry about that, hit the 'submit' button too quickly. I meant to clarify)

  19. note by Klar · · Score: 1

    forgot to include br's so formating looks pretty dumb on that post.. also, I started downloading a file, was getting pretty good speeds(150k/s), then lost connection to eXeem, and havnet been able to get back in :|

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Download Link by nstrom · · Score: 1

    Download link did not appear on the linked download.htm page for me, but is apparantly here: http://download.exeem.com/eXeem0.20.exe

    1. Re:Download Link by nstrom · · Score: 1

      Just finished downloading, and the official file does match the posted torrent.

      $ md5sum eXeem0.20.exe
      282f935710277f2253d45d45dc2d84fb eXeem0.20.exe

      CRC32/SFV:
      ; Generated by cfv v1.16 on 2005-01-21 at 21:27.00
      ;
      eXeem0.20.exe 5c01a28b

  22. Exeem lite by eagle3fox2 · · Score: 0, Informative

    No cydoor eXeem lite: http://exlite.tk/ get it while it's hot! Works too

  23. hmm... by which+way+is+up · · Score: 0, Troll

    This should be good... BT is without question the fastest p2p app (in fact, the only thing that has ever topped out my 'net connection), but it needs two features to kill off the others in my book:

    1. Search - it's no fun to rely on third party websites to find things. Hopefully now we'll be able to do this.
    2. Anonymity - BT could use an option for a system like Freenet's for making it really hard to tell who's serving who. Combined with the distributed nature of BT, it would be difficult to prove anything at all about BT users.

    Here's another thought: the current BT system is really good at dispersing new content, like distro ISOs and TV shows, through RSS feeds from central websites. It would be cool to be able to subscribe to network-wide custom feeds, to stay informed about new files that match certain criteria.

    1. Re:hmm... by VAXGeek · · Score: 1

      An option for Freenet mode?

      A good use for Freenet is re-experiencing surfing the web on 1200 baud.

      Slow down cowboy!

      --
      this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
    2. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bittorrent + RSS does exactly that -- allows you to subscribe to "torrent feeds".. google it for more info.

    3. Re:hmm... by mogrify · · Score: 1

      I have to say this is an exceptionally coherent and well-considered post. However, it happens to be mine, from a previous Exeem article...

      --
      perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
    4. Re:hmm... by which+way+is+up · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually i believe you coppied it from me first

    5. Re:hmm... by m50d · · Score: 1

      Speed and anonymity are mutually exclusive, because the only way to get anonymity is by having people proxy for each other.

      --
      I am trolling
    6. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think you are a fucking crack whore.

      plagiarizing biotch

  24. official torrent download link by Zulithe · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://suprbash.org/vip/lexa/exeem020.torrent from a moderator in the exeem chatroom happy torrenting

  25. Safe and sane P2P client... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Is this the safe and sane version of bit torrent? Or do I have to worry about 1) being infected by virus, malware and God knows what else, and 2) will the record industry's Nazis come kicking down my door for downloading Linux-related files?

    I just scrubbed my roommates' computers that was loaded to the brim with virus and malware from using P2P when they download music files (so they claim) with various P2P clients. I like bit torrent although I think using FTP would be a lot faster sometimes.

    1. Re:Safe and sane P2P client... by goldspider · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "2) will the record industry's Nazis come kicking down my door for downloading Linux-related files?"

      No, the record industry's Nazis will come kicking down your door for illegally distributing copyrighted music.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:Safe and sane P2P client... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, lets get this straight. This come up in every fuckin' article posted at /. reguarding Exeem. Exeem is NOT being developed by anyone at suprnova.org. The developers of Exeem are paying the creator/owner of suprnova.org to promote Exeem - they bought his user base, and that's it. Nothing more. FFS, make it right.

    3. Re:Safe and sane P2P client... by EnormousTooth · · Score: 1

      Nice copy and paste. suprnova.org. [suprnova.org] Next time think before you paste.

      --
      I don't use Emacs; it uses me.
    4. Re:Safe and sane P2P client... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLCOPTER!!!1111!!1!
      YOU ARE TEH GAY MAN WITH NOT LIEKING DA PR0N!!
      LOLLERSKATES@@!!21!

    5. Re:Safe and sane P2P client... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mod parent down. I Googled and the above post is ripped off from here. Also, it's been posted on slashdot before -- how else would 'the same guys that run suprnova.org. [suprnova.org]' appear?

      Not to mention, he did the same thing with this post in the same thread.

      Go back to your cave, troll.

    6. Re:Safe and sane P2P client... by aero2600-5 · · Score: 4, Informative

      which way is up, this post you've just made and received a "+5 informative" for is my post from December 2nd when Exeem was first brought up for discussion. It would appear that this is the second time you've done this today. Quit being such a karma whore.

      As a side note, I was banned from the Exeem beta forum for making this post on Slashdot.

      Moderators, please mod down this plagiarizing piece of crap.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    7. Re:Safe and sane P2P client... by zenthax · · Score: 1

      or distrbuting any files with names simliar to copyrighted files. What rights?

  26. question about linux use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does the adware they install run under wine too?

    1. Re:question about linux use by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      Modded funny, but I'd really like to know the answer to this.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  27. It's time to do a GPL version of this by darthcamaro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This service will end up the same as Supernova eventually. The only way a p2p torrent service will ever survive is if it is GNU/GPL.

    1. Re:It's time to do a GPL version of this by Kidbro · · Score: 1

      Elaborate, please. BitTorrent itself is released under the MIT license. Suprnova was just data - no code - so licensing it under the GPL wouldn't have made much sense (license what, by the way?)

      I really don't understand what your suggested solution is. It's not even clear what problem it's a solution for.

  28. Question by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    If it doesn't use trackers, how is the connection between clients done? "Suprnodes" i suppose? I'm trying to find out but TFSHBS (The * Site Has Been Slashdotted). So, any info plz? Or a .torrent for the docs? ;)

    1. Re:Question by awolk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it doesn't use trackers, how is the connection between clients done? "Suprnodes" i suppose? I'm trying to find out but TFSHBS (The * Site Has Been Slashdotted). So, any info plz? Or a .torrent for the docs? ;)

      1. Mirrors:
      http://www.mirrordot.org/stories/764ecea 2714349e08 72bb15300c31d12/index.html
      http://www.mirrordot.o rg/stories/be6b55cafbd710266 e6055abafed4cee/index.html

      2. No, everyone acts as tracker(for things you've downloaded), as far as I know ... Haven't read everything through, though, but I think it's fully decentralised, but please correct me if I'm wrong.

  29. not open source... by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    not to be trusted with your privacy, period.

    1. Re:not open source... by which+way+is+up · · Score: 1, Troll

      eXeem is a piece of shit. Not only that it will have adaware and spyware, it is also a "lock-in". You will only be able to use it on SuprNova. They have modified the torrent file. It is missing a lot of dictionaries ("key -> value"), and dictionaries that should have been subdictionaries start directly in the file. For example "files" is not in "info" it starts with it directly. This torrent changes were unnecessary. Also, the "announce" and "announce-list" are missing. eXeem has a hardcoded url of a tracker of all the peers on eXeem. The original seeder of a torrent acts as a tracker (so SuprNova won't have to host torrents), but eXeem is in no way decentralized because of the tracker that keeps in contact all the eXeem users (it does not care about torrents, just eXeem users). So, all you have to do is to kill the main server, and all the users of exeem will be disconnected (this happened when suprnova died). THIS IS WORSE THAN THE WAY TORRENTS ACT NOW. EXEEM IS HYPE AND A WAY TO MAKE MONEY. IT SUCKS! I think the best way to decentralized BitTorrent, is to have trackers that are decentralized IRC server style. If you people want something decentralized and a little bit of BitTorrent, get G2 (Gnutella2) and add BitTorrent's tit-for-tat to it.

    2. Re:not open source... by manyac · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kenosis (www.kenosisp2p.org) promises to solve the centralized tracker problem, and.. it's open source :-) I've tried it some time now, running my own kenosis-enabled tracker, but I never see any torrents listed, the network is still in its infancy.

    3. Re:not open source... by nightgeometry · · Score: 1

      It was so much more insightful when space_soldier first said it here

      Hmm, this is the third time this story you have ripped off another comment...

      --
      The best is the enemy of the good
    4. Re:not open source... by jo42 · · Score: 1

      I'll wait until someone does it as a plug-in for Azureus...

    5. Re:not open source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who gives a shit if it's open source, really? It doesn't matter, quit bitching.

    6. Re:not open source... by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      I believe 'which way is up' has brought the defintion of karma-whore to a whole new level. It's so sad that it's almost amusing..

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
  30. What piracy? P2P is 100% legit! by goldspider · · Score: 1

    Hmm... from reading Slashdot, I was under the impression that the only files being traded through P2P were research papers, Linux distributions, and independent music files.

    What is this 'piracy' you speak of? Surely there aren't people using P2P networks to commit copyright infringement!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  31. Interesting place for a company by redshadow01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just looked up exeem.com on whois...looks like a caribbean island is a good place to be if the MPAA comes calling...take a look for yourself:

    Administrative Contact:
    Swarm, Systems Inc. contact@exeem.com
    Swarm Systems Inc.
    Suite 4 Tample Building, Main
    Charlestown 1000
    Saint Kitts and Nevis
    304568187
    Technical Contact:
    Swarm, Systems Inc. contact@exeem.com
    Swarm Systems Inc.
    Suite 4 Tample Building, Main
    Charlestown 1000
    Saint Kitts and Nevis
    304568187

    1. Re:Interesting place for a company by moonboi · · Score: 1

      sealand would also have been an alternative they are offshore and unregulated, costly bandwith still...

    2. Re:Interesting place for a company by MC68000 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. St. Kitts and Nevis is not a signatory of any world copyright treaties. This is the reason why part of Sharman networks (which owns Kazaa) is partly located on Nauru (a remote pacific island).

      --
      E = m c^3 Don't drink and derive E = m c^3
    3. Re:Interesting place for a company by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      "Costly" doesn't begin to describe HavenCo's servers (which are located in Sealand). Exorbitant is more accurate. Colocation starts at $1500 per month, and you get a paltry 256kbps connection. A 1Mbps connection is $1800 per month.

      They claim to have intensive security, but it doesn't seem to me anything that would be too trivial for a reasonably-skilled team to get around. Miles of ocean separating Sealand and Britain and only a handful of residents on the island means that if something was wanted, it wouldn't be too difficult to get.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  32. If you download Exeem Lite by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Informative

    make sure you read the readme file

  33. Right, cos that's original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lately I'm beginning to wish it was called STFU/Linux.

  34. No mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...?

    Crap!

  35. Torrent for the beta? by dr_skipper · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone hosting a torrent for the exeem beta?

    I'd check suprnova.org but you know... lol

  36. eliminate trackers, doom bittorrent by sbma44 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey! No need for trackers! Hurrah! Peers can just find each other automatically! Gosh, I wonder how that works -- could it be a standardized port range? And could that make it incredibly easy to throttle, track and persecute BitTorrent use?!?!

    If my hunch is correct, these guys are morons. The nominal point of Exeem is to reduce the ability of copyright owners to sue pirates. Actually, it'll make it much easier for BigChampagne and others to track down users and prosecute them. Way to go, guys.

    Please note that I'm not making a moral judgment about piracy -- please withhold the flames. My point is simply that the Exeem architecture, while created to fix BT's legal vulnerability, is actually likely to enhance it.

    1. Re:eliminate trackers, doom bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm exeem is nothing to do with making it harder to sue people other than the owner of the tracker!

      Basically it's BT without the single-point-of-failure tracker.

    2. Re:eliminate trackers, doom bittorrent by Tezkah · · Score: 1

      Bittorrent already has a standardized port range, 6881 to 6891. This is simply a new way to get torrent files, not a radical shift for the bittorrent protocal. You'll still connect to seeds and peers, but you'll get the .torrent files on a P2P basis, instead of a centralized tracker.

      However, that doesn't change the fact that eXeem is adware.

    3. Re:eliminate trackers, doom bittorrent by sbma44 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm aware of the standardized port range. However, you can specify any other range you'd like and the tracker will make sure it works. The tracker can also be set up to run on an arbitrary port as specified in the .torrent file.

      So while a lot of BT users can be found by the ??AA, smart users have changed their default port range and can only be identified by going to the tracker. Even if the BT portion of this app remains port-agnostic, the .torrent distribution and peer discovery portion of it is almost certain to run on a specific port.

    4. Re:eliminate trackers, doom bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start Azureus, open a torrent, click details and see the ips of everyone downloading. What was that about privacy?

      And its open source, yay :)

    5. Re:eliminate trackers, doom bittorrent by sbma44 · · Score: 1

      see the IPs of everyone downloading that torrent for as long as you're connected, you mean. Build a client that takes advantage of the Exeem network and see the IPs of everyone downloading any torrent over as long a time period as you'd like.

    6. Re:eliminate trackers, doom bittorrent by squall14716 · · Score: 1

      The only problem with that is that it still has a single point of failure.

  37. eXeem and emule by huwnet · · Score: 1

    I'll wait for a new version of eXeem lite and then an OSS implementation for emule

  38. whoops by sbma44 · · Score: 1

    edit the above: "prosecute" BitTorrent use. Persecute certainly does imply a moral judgment. Sorry for the malapropism.

  39. it's not opensource by kard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    from the exeem-faq:
    How can eXeem(TM) be free?
    eXeem(TM) is supported only by ad revenue. This allows the developers to continue making upgrades to the network and enhancing the eXeem client for you.

    bittorent-faq:
    BitTorrent is great! How can I help?
    You can give a donation.

    see the difference?

    exeem-faq:
    Is eXeem(TM) open source?
    No, eXeem(TM) is not open source.

    bittorrent-faq:
    What license is BitTorrent released under?
    MIT License, which basically lets you do anything you want with it so long as you leave the license notification in the source.

    bittorent is there, it's widespread, does not contain any ads, the source code is available, runs on anything that runs python (means mac/win/linux and a lot more)

    and btw the author lives from the paypal donations he receives from the happy users.

    somehow the suprnova people do not understand these things...

    1. Re:it's not opensource by kard · · Score: 1

      to reply to my own post..

      from the exeem-faq:

      eXeem(TM) is supported only by ad revenue. This allows the developers to continue making upgrades to the network ....

      WHAT network?

      are they running some dedicated servers? or what?

    2. Re:it's not opensource by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      That is because they (exeem, suprnova) are/were merely trying to profit from promoting software piracy.

      Anyone who says P2P shared content is mostly legit is either outright lying, lying to themselves, or blind and ignorant.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    3. Re:it's not opensource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      btw the author lives from the paypal donations he receives

      ...and his job working on Steam for Valve Software.

    4. Re:it's not opensource by derrickh · · Score: 1

      Doesnt the author actually live on the check he receives from Valve for working on the Steam project?

      D

    5. Re:it's not opensource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and btw the author lives from the paypal donations he receives from the happy users.

      Actually...Bram Cohen isn't living off of paypal donations... he's happily employed by VALVe.

    6. Re:it's not opensource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author works for Valve (the makers of Halflife) as a p2p programmer for their steam platform

    7. Re:it's not opensource by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      Actually...Bram Cohen isn't living off of paypal donations... he's happily employed by VALVe.

      Yeah, but Valve still pays him via paypal donations.

  40. seriously though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hasn't eMule and the ed2k network been doing this sort of thing for a long time? Sure there are servers, but the serverless kademlia network has been around for a while. Is exeem going to be any faster than the firmly established ed2k network?

  41. Re:Oh NO! This is TERRIBLE NEWS!!! by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    There is still a centralized server to connect to the network.

    Expect the publicity they've managed to recieve to cause eXeem to cease to exist within a few months. I'm sure that MPAA lawyers are waiting with an ambush the day this is released publically and the first movie is posted.

  42. Cydoor Spyware, Ads, Toolbar by Alien+Venom · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you are really interested in downloading it, you can download it from FileForum as the main site is down.

    But please beware. It does constain spyware!

    As stated in their privacy policy:
    The ads appearing on the Exeem.com Web site and within eXeem(TM) application are delivered by our web advertising partner, Cydoor. Information about users of eXeem(TM) and Exeem.com, such as the number of times they have viewed an ad (but not user name, address, or other personal information), is used to serve ads to users. If you would like more information about Cydoor, please visit. Ads that might appear outside Exeem.com and eXeem(TM) application are Opt-out ads, that you have a chance to uninstall. Outside Exeem.com and eXeem(TM) application is eXeem's Toolbar LookSmart.

    1. Re:Cydoor Spyware, Ads, Toolbar by Alien+Venom · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, this is indeed a sad day for the p2p community.

      I went into #suprnova.org on irc.suprnova.org and mentioned the fact that eXeem contained spyware. The first time, I just inquired about it. I was "warned" (kicked) and told to "keep my thoughts to myself." The second time I spoke in all caps, telling users to read the privacy policy if they didn't believe me. I was then banned.

    2. Re:Cydoor Spyware, Ads, Toolbar by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

      just went in there and posted the same thing...I was then disconnected. They could be a fun game to play :)

      --
      "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
    3. Re:Cydoor Spyware, Ads, Toolbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you installed it?

      I have, then I scanned my machine with a fully updated AdAware 6, which found no Cydoor, so wtf are you talking about?

    4. Re:Cydoor Spyware, Ads, Toolbar by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      I just logged in and did the same thing...got banned :)

      I only hope more of us join in.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    5. Re:Cydoor Spyware, Ads, Toolbar by duffahtolla · · Score: 1

      I just installed it and it was there.

      Found with updated spybot.

    6. Re:Cydoor Spyware, Ads, Toolbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cydoor is integrated into the client.dll file.. At least it disappears when exeem is uninstalled.. Either way what spybot finds is just an empty directory.. windows\system32\adcache that the integrated cydoor creates

  43. Naw. . . by Sialagogue · · Score: 1


    Thanks, but I'll wait for eXeem E++

    --
    The only acceptable defense of scientific results is to say that they were the product of the Scientific Method.
  44. Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's the torrent: http://www.lokitorrent.com/download.php?id=104617

  45. Re:Oh NO! This is TERRIBLE NEWS!!! by secolactico · · Score: 1

    Heh, meant to write "who will the *AA's sue now". Freudian slip.

    Anybody seeding/leeching in the swarm. I've seen letters of complains for users sharing with bittorrent, not hosting the .torrent nor the tracker.

    --
    No sig
  46. compares to Kazaa ? by jephthah · · Score: 0

    "This allows for Kazaa-style searching..." ... of your internet activity?

  47. still needs help by mohrt · · Score: 1

    Decentralization may be a good step, but this still doesn't stop folks from plaguing the network with spyware/fakes/decoys/etc. There needs to be a karma system built in so files/users can be scored by the decentralized user community, and filtered on those scores.

  48. Screw that Cydor shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...anybody has a crack for eXeem 0.2? :}

  49. lite client by Lukano · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.exlite.net for the "lite" spyware/adware free version (I had sumbitted this story too with this included - but no, it got rejected *sigh*).

    It's the 0.18 beta which asks for a key, but until a lite of 0.20 is released, if you close the window asking for a beta key, the program will work.

    The official 0.20 client is confirmed to include Cydoor and SearchSquire right out of the box.

    1. Re:lite client by Stop+Error · · Score: 1

      I so loathe Spyware, I may look into the "lite" version. I am interested to know how the eXeem network plans on protecting itself from poisoning? When you went to Suprnova.org you knew that the posted torrents had been screened my moderators. With this new network the **AA's can simply poison the network the same way they have FastTrack.

      --
      No keyboard detected. Press any key to continue.
    2. Re:lite client by LoneGunner · · Score: 1
      I posted a story early this morning as well.. which was rejected too.. *sigh*

      It's now been about 7 hours since i found the exeem lite program, and only 40 minutes since slashdot listed the launch of exeem.com website. When i was first able to connect with the exeem lite program there was only about 2000 users total. That slowly rose to about 4000 over the course of the day. Then exeem.com launched and the slashdot story was posted within minutes. The current count of users is up to 30k. 25k joined within 30 minutes of it reaching a major news source. Thats a major jump in traffic. And so far it has been fast and responsive.

      I created a site for discusion about the program and bittorrent in general. If anyone wants to check it out you can find it here http://www.exeem-torrents.com

    3. Re:lite client by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      The current count of users is up to 30k. 25k joined within 30 minutes of it reaching a major news source.

      Haha, what a grand victory for Cydoor and their partners. :-)
      The funny thing is that there are tons of huge regular BT sites still available.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:lite client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are still a few torrents that passed moderators. That's why there's a Fake/Virus suprnovaforums.

      However, I do hate it that you have to sign up just to view that forum.

  50. Re:Woohoo by grub · · Score: 1


    Give it time. :) eDonkey is closed source but some good people reverse engineered the protocol and we now have eMule.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  51. Libtorrent by Rangsk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Exeem uses libtorrent as its codebase, with extra coding for the decentralized tracker. Libtorrent is an open source GPL'd C++ implementation of the bittorrent protocol. The only requirements for compiling it are support for STL and the latest Boost. This means it works in Windows, Linux, Mac OSX... even cygwin! It's also a library, so it can be plugged into any application.

    I've had many communications with the creator, and he's a very cool guy and quite dedicated to the work. I helped a little with debugging, etc, but my main interest at the time was using it to in my own graphical interface. I never completed the project, but I still feel a good connection to libtorrent.

    --
    "Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose." --Douglas Adams
    1. Re:Libtorrent by mackstann · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exeem is using a GPL library? Doesn't that mean they're violating the GPL?

    2. Re:Libtorrent by yeremein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Libtorrent is an open source GPL'd C++ implementation of the bittorrent protocol.

      You're right--it is GPL. Not LGPL.

      This means eXeem needs to release the source code of their client, rather than shipping a spyware-encrusted binary, or they're infringing libtorrent's copyright.

      Then again, why would I expect the authors of eXeem to respect anyone's copyright?

    3. Re:Libtorrent by elendril · · Score: 1

      libtorrent is released under the BSD-license.

      See: http://libtorrent.sourceforge.net/manual.html

      If GPL'ed, it probably would not have been used in eXeem (it's probably quite difficult to make a spyware ridden application from a GPL'ed app...).

    4. Re:Libtorrent by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      Libtorrent has a BSD license, not GPL (otherwise Exeem couldn't use it in a non-free program)

    5. Re:Libtorrent by mackstann · · Score: 1

      They should fix their freshmeat page.

    6. Re:Libtorrent by cortana · · Score: 1

      And their COPYING file!

    7. Re:Libtorrent by cortana · · Score: 1

      Where's this information come from? Their COPYING file states that their code is released under GPL version 2.

    8. Re:Libtorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could have negotiated a separate license with the author of libtorrent. I doubt that they did, though.

    9. Re:Libtorrent by fcrick · · Score: 1

      This is what appears at the top of the source files in the CVS repository. It does NOT look like GPL to me... /*

      Copyright (c) 2003, Arvid Norberg, Magnus Jonsson
      All rights reserved.

      Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
      modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
      are met:

      * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
      notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
      * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
      notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
      the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
      * Neither the name of the author nor the names of its
      contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
      from this software without specific prior written permission.

      THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
      AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
      IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
      ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
      LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
      CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
      SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
      INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
      CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
      ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
      POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

      */

      --
      Your signatures belong to me.
    10. Re:Libtorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they should.

    11. Re:Libtorrent by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Rubbish. Look at the libtorrent project page; it clearly states that it's BSD-licensed, which makes it OK to include it in closed-source software.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  52. Re:Woohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I love how every time people do things to limit rights, the open source community is there making sure everything is freely available"


    I hate people like you who fail to notice this is a vicious circle. The result of each new rip-off-the-XXAA program is a reduction in our rights. Sure, there will always be another response. The end result is to hurt the people who have legitimate (legal) uses for stuff like BT. Now go download all that stuff you want but don't feel is good enough to pay for $h|t Bag.

  53. Definitely Has Spyware by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the site's privacy statement....

    "The ads appearing on the Exeem.com Web site and within eXeem(TM) application are delivered by our web advertising partner, Cydoor. Information about users of eXeem(TM) and Exeem.com, such as the number of times they have viewed an ad (but not user name, address, or other personal information), is used to serve ads to users."

    Cydoor is given a 7/10 Threat Assessment level by lavasoft.de, makers of AdAware.

    1. Re:Definitely Has Spyware by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

      Though most people don't seem to mind it.

      It's amazing. When news comes out that spyware is in a program.... it has no impact on it's usage.

      IMHO I avoid this crap. You know exactly what your getting:

      1. It includes spyware (a real sign of a legitimate company).
      2. Allegedly bought rights to suprnova name, so it can call itself the successor
      3. How is this change legality? Now rather than attack 1 site, and a handful of people, lawyers will be able to easily go after a giant web of users in a P2P network. This doesn't give anyone immunity. If anything it makes more people share liability.

      IMHO this product is a bit bogus. It smells foul.

      I'd caution people to think twice on this one, and consider what they are getting into.

    2. Re:Definitely Has Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I scanned my machine with AdAware 6 (fully updated) and there is no spyware in eXeem beta.

      Some people want it to fail simply because Sloncek is going to make some $$.

      Pathetic.

      If you have some VALID criticism, then provide it after the programme is out of beta.

    3. Re:Definitely Has Spyware by cortana · · Score: 1

      How about: they are distributing a derivative work of Libtorrent, without releasing their source code as the GPL requires them to do so?

    4. Re:Definitely Has Spyware by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      " I scanned my machine with AdAware 6 (fully updated) and there is no spyware in eXeem beta. "

      Perhaps AdAware isn't recent enough to pick up on the spyware in Exeem. The Exeem FAQ states that it does indeed contain adware/spyware. They fail to tell the user what it's doing or collecting. As I don't see any visible ads in Exeem, I can only assume they're data mining.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    5. Re:Definitely Has Spyware by eht · · Score: 1

      That's funny, but according to the manual libtorrent is under a BSD license, so no source code required.

      For some reason freshmeat lists it as GPL, but that contradicts the sourceforge home page and their own manual.

    6. Re:Definitely Has Spyware by cortana · · Score: 1

      Just because some random web page says it is, doesn't make it so.

      The actual files you download from Sourceforce say that the project is GPL.

    7. Re:Definitely Has Spyware by eht · · Score: 1

      you mean like this file, looks like BSD style license to me. Or maybe this one, which also looks like BSD style license.

      And those random web pages are their official pages that they refer to themselves.

    8. Re:Definitely Has Spyware by cortana · · Score: 1

      Neither of those files are present in the released version of the software.

      $ head libtorrent-0.4.7/COPYING
      GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
      Version 2, June 1991

      Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
      59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
      Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
      of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.

      Preamble

    9. Re:Definitely Has Spyware by eht · · Score: 1

      Who said they're using release software.

  54. Not suprnova by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 5, Informative
    I don't care how often the press releases state this is the next version of Suprnova....it is NOT.

    The company behind Exeem (there is indeed a company, and they are going to be profiting, which raises some interesting legal questions) basically paid the creator of Suprnova for the rights to use his name and to basically say that Exeem is the next Suprnova. In layman's terms: They bought his credibility and userbase.

    Personally, that doesn't matter that much to me. If it works, and gets as large as Suprnova with more protection and overall improvements...well, what do I care if they make money off of it. However, I will NOT tolerate any spyware/adware (a banner ad in the window is fine) bundled with it. Thankfully the makers of Exeemlite have taken care of this. I wonder how aggressively the folks at Exeem will handle this. The folks over at Sharman Networks (Kazaa) basically cut off everybody else on Kazaalite from their existing network.

    So, in conclusion, I don't care if they make money as long as it helps protect me, and gives me more value than Suprnova did, and I will not tolerate any spyware/adware. If they screw that up, they've just screwed themselves.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Not suprnova by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, I entirely agree.

      Strike 1, exeem is not open source. Strike 2, it contains spyware/adware. Strike 3, they attempted to buy credibility.

      I'll stick to googling for the torrents I need.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    2. Re:Not suprnova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are engaging in slander.

      eXeem beta has no spyware, and a fully updated scan of AdAware 6 says so.

      Do your homework before you post!

    3. Re:Not suprnova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to burst your bubble but,
      eXeem,Swarm Systems all belong to Sloncek.
      A simple google search, Hell even a search here on slyck should have that info(Unless it was deleted here on slyck)

    4. Re:Not suprnova by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be libel?

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    5. Re:Not suprnova by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      If Exeem does not have spyware, why is it that there already exists a "lite" version of it that claims to have removed the spyware?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  55. It has. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Informative
    From TFA:

    Third Party Advertising
    The ads appearing on the Exeem.com Web site and within eXeem(TM) application are delivered by our web advertising partner, Cydoor. Information about users of eXeem(TM) and Exeem.com, such as the number of times they have viewed an ad (but not user name, address, or other personal information), is used to serve ads to users. If you would like more information about Cydoor, please visit: http://www.cydoor.com/Cydoor/Company/CompanyPrivac y.htm

    Ads that might appear outside Exeem.com and eXeem(TM) application are Opt-out ads, that you have a chance to uninstall. Outside Exeem.com and eXeem(TM) application is eXeem's Toolbar LookSmart.


    And from elsewhere:


    Spyware: Cydoor

    NUISANCE LEVEL *****
    THREAT LEVEL *****

    Cydoor

    This technology can be activated both in online and offline modes. The technology's architecture can be integrated into any software program. Cydoor can update or rotate banner ads not only when users are online, but also when they are offline. Upon installation of a software application integrated with their advertising technology, Cydoor Technologies sets a numerical identifier on your computer.

    The following files are used:

    In C:\Windows\System: cd_clint.dll, cd_gif.dll, cd_swf.dll and cd_load.exe.

    Removal:

    You can delete the C:\Windows\System\Adcache directory. Then remove all instances from the Registry. Look in HKLM\Software, HKCU\Software. Look also for entries in HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Current Version\Run and in HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Current Version\Shareddlls.

    If you wish to KaZaa without the Cydoor spyware, copy the cd_clint.dll, remove the Cydoor agents with a spyware cleaner, and place the cd_clint.dll back in the Windows System folder.


    OK, I think I'll pass.
    1. Re:It has. by k-hell · · Score: 1

      How typical spyware. Does not install in the usual Program Files directory so it's more difficult to find, and of course, provides no easy way of uninstalling if I read the above correctly... except using regedit....

  56. safe to use it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since its not openscource and there is no linux version we were discussing if there is any thruth to this:

    http://www.slyck.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8875&p ostdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0/

    anyone got an idea?

  57. Wow by Lullabye_Muse · · Score: 1

    24,000 users and only 11 hits for porn

    1. Re:Wow by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      The kids are spelling it "pr0n" these days.

    2. Re:Wow by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Per default, adult content is filtered.
      There is TONS of porn.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  58. Bah by Ryokos_boytoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    "supported by ad revenue ..." I stopped reading right there.

    --


    If you don't say anything, you won't be called on to repeat it. -- Calvin Coolidge
    1. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that any different from slashdot, dumbass.

    2. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot doesn't install spyware on my machine, moron.

  59. "Linux users can run it too" by jaakko · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't this be "wine can run it too"? Wine, you know, works also under other operating systems than linux. Oh, you didn't care about them, sorry.

    1. Re:"Linux users can run it too" by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

      A native binary is indeed something way different than just the fact its running under WINE and Linux != Linux/x86. And lets be honest: if you were running FreeBSD/x86 you'd rather have a native x86 binary for Linux than a Windows binary you'd run through WINE. Besides, BitTorrent ran just fine in Bash. Try that with Exeem...

      They have the source, they can compile it under *NIX. Or they could give the community the source, to port it, or to understand the protocol and eventually writing an own implementation... but thats not what they want. They want to issue control. The spyware will be get rid of by the smarter users. The clueless ones won't run the Lite version just like with KaZaA. Just like with KaZaA and other proprietary protocols, it'll be reverse engineered.

      Its not from Suprnova either. The Suprnova guys got paid by this corporation to basically sell their popularity to this 'new' technology. I hope it won't get popular though. Why not? Because 1) its tightly controlled / closed technology / adware, spyware 2) its not really revolutionary nor doesn't solve the anonomity problem; its just more decentralized in an easy manner 3) because they use Suprnova.org's name. Call me a wanker, but i oppose such abusive way of 'lifting' on someone else his popularity.

      --
      WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
  60. No way would I go near this by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    Forget it. Bittorrent as we have all come to know and love is not dead. It is just moved around a bit. Its still quite easy to find plenty of torrent files out there.

    Exeem is a money making scheme and thats about it. Its not to be trusted.

  61. How can it be easier? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With bittorrent everyone's IPs are in plain sight on a plainly visible central tracker. No matter what Exeem does I can't see how it could make it "much easier" to track people down.

    That said I don't think the nominal point of Exseem is to "reduce the ability of copyright owners to sue pirates". Individual pirates will probably be as attackable as ever (you simply can't offer something to the public without them knowing it came from you in an efficient manner otherwise). It just aims to remove the risk of a central point of failure, the tracker, being attacked (legally or otherwise).

    It's possible that Exeem could make users open to more prosecution though. Typically Bittorrent users can be seen uploading/downloading one piece of content at a time. If Exeem decentralises in such a way that their computers are also taking part in indexing and tracking downloads then arguably they are involving themselves with more copyright violation than with Bittorrent.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:How can it be easier? by sbma44 · · Score: 1

      Honeypots are admittedly a concern with the BT system. But setting up a honeypot and collecting IPs isn't the industry's preferred method -- you have to give away content, and you only get evidence of infringements one torrent at a time. This is a very serial procedure, without a great return in prosecutions for the effort it takes.

      By contrast, if there's a well-defined port or ports, the industry can just monitor traffic on it for a period of weeks or months using either legal pressure on an ISP or a custom client, collect tons of infringements per IP and start back up the subpoena factory.

      You're right that the industry will always go after pirates, but the Exeem architecture makes it much easier to automate the process. There'll be no super-sites to get sued, but the legal exposure gets shifted to the user.

  62. Spyware by g00z · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want to install Cydoor, by all means try this beta. If you'd rather not install not spyware, stay away from this one folks.

    The ./ editors should have included this in the article summary before they posted this one. Now Cydoor just got a bunch of new sucke^H^H^H^H^Hcustomers.

    --
    "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
  63. How's this better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already have things like MUTE and others. Sure it's "de-centralized" but also unsecure (non-encrypted, maybe a fixed portrange) and closed source. And on top of all it has spyware!

    Absoluetly nothing in this sounds tempting enough even to try it out. So i just ask: Why?

  64. Exeem is adware ridden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    You might want to check out this FAQ, particularly point 2.

    Say, are those popups jumping on your desktop?

    1. Re:Exeem is adware ridden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I always run things like keygens under Virtual PC. It can install all the adware, trojans, and malware it wants, and once the key is generated, I just say "buh-bye" and discard changes to the virtual hard-disk image.

      Sounds like the same strategy would be handy for running Exeem.

  65. Bah... "linux" version by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Wine isn't an option. I was used to running my .torrents on a "gruntwork" box, I'd copy .torrent files I wanted to a public share on that box, which would be running a "screen btlaunchmanycurses.py ~", a console-mode version of bittorrent that continuously scans the folder (my home folder ~) for .torrents, and downloads them.

    I'd check up on it by ssh'ing in and doing a "screen -x".

    So, what's I to do now? Install all the bloat of X and Wine? Because frankly, Win98 runs better on this old box I use for the task (an old P200/MMX)

    It's an outside shot, but any chances of an ncurses based exeem client in the mix?

    Or, can I get .torrents from exeem and then export them to oldschool bittorrent?

    Anyone? Beuller?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  66. the profiling they do for adverts would help RIAA by CdBee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a P2P company is going to be profiling its users - and you;re worried about spyware?

    Can you imagine the legal field-day if the RIAA got hold of Exeem's user profiles, with records of everything they downloaded?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  67. of mlDonkey by DrYak · · Score: 1, Informative
    eDonkey is closed source but some good people reverse engineered the protocol and we now have eMule.
    ...or mlDonkey, one of the best client available out there :
    - it's multi protocol (Web + Donkey + Torrent + Gnutella + G2 + etc...)
    - it has a client/server design, were you can let mlDonkey core run on your home Linux server 24/24, and remotly connect (with GUI, or with a webbrowser) to control downloads from your workstation.
    - it written in a managed language (NO WAY to do buffer overruns : very secure)

    It's my favorite and that what I run on my home linux server.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:of mlDonkey by Transdimentia · · Score: 1

      You are aware that humans coded your managed language right?

    2. Re:of mlDonkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's my favorite and that what I run on my home linux server"
      Ohh and you run that dialer thru wine too? Or is there a native version?

      Informative my ass. Hey Einstein, what you want is this.

      Slash pimps with mod points, should follow the F-word links!

  68. No torrent? by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

    What no bittorrent download?

    1. Re:No torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted one, but got modded down.

  69. from the FAQ by i41Overlord · · Score: 2, Informative

    3. Do I need a serial? No, you DO NOT need a serial to use eXlite, simply close the serial window that pops up on startup

  70. Re:What piracy? P2P is 100% legit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, the paper I am sharing is called "Amateur *nal sluts" err does that count as copyright infringement?

  71. Spyware infested filth! by i41Overlord · · Score: 4, Informative

    Everyone was hoping that this would replace Suprnova.

    Sad news- it doesn't.

    The dead memory of Suprnova has been replaced by a spyware infested program that is marketed under the guise of being a Suprnova replacement.

    If you like clogging your system up with programs such as Cydoor, be my guest. But if not, reject this filth.

  72. And The Aggregator? by Beautyon · · Score: 1

    So, now that the trackers and torrents are distributed, the first person to cobble together an aggregating site wtih categories will be shut down for what reason exactly?

    The eXeem links work:

    Kylie_Minogue_no_underwear_clip.mpg

    You could easily build a community around them. Will bloggers be 'cease and deceased' for posting eXeem links? Will Google filter out all exeem links that it crawls?

    --
    ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  73. License Violation by tweakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Confirmed!

    The Sourceforge page incorrectly lists the license as BSD. The COPYING file in the archive contains the GPL2 license. Unfortunately, none of the source files contain a license header.

    Does anyone know if this is a problem?

    1. Re:License Violation by Sarev0k · · Score: 1

      Copyleft licenses like the GPL are used to grant people rights they wouldn't normally have.

      By no means does not having that license header in the source files grant people any aditional rights.

    2. Re:License Violation by interJ · · Score: 5, Informative
      You are wrong.

      From the libtorrent documentation: libtorrent is released under the BSD-license.

      I don't see any COPYING file in the archive, and the source files contain the following:

      Copyright (c) 2003, Arvid Norberg, Daniel Wallin
      All rights reserved.

      Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
      modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
      are met:

      * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
      notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
      * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
      notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
      the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
      * Neither the name of the author nor the names of its
      contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
      from this software without specific prior written permission.

      THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
      AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
      IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
      ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
      LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
      CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
      SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
      INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
      CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
      ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
      POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
    3. Re:License Violation by JohnyDog · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, from the sources files it's clear that it's BSD-style licence.

      --
      People who like this sort of sig will find this the sort of sig they like.
    4. Re:License Violation by yeremein · · Score: 1
      Mod parent up, from the sources files it's clear that it's BSD-style licence.

      Go to the libtorrent home page. In the first paragraph, we read:
      "LibTorrent is a BitTorrent library written in C++ for *nix. It is designed to avoid redundant copying and storing of data that other clients and libraries suffer from. Licensed under the GPL."
      Then download the source. There is a file named COPYING in the root directory of the archive, which contains (surprise) the GPL, version 2.
  74. And here's an irony.... by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    The Grateful Dead and a couple of thousand other bands (including, as of a couple of years ago, the estate of Jimi Hendrix) allow non-commercial distribution of their concert recordings. Non-commercial! But by making this an ad-driven product, the bozos behind eXeem have ensured that it can't even be used to legally distribute most music that can ordinarily be legally traded on the Internet. Thanks but no thanks. I'll stick with ordinary bittorrent, which at least has some measurable legal uses. :)

    1. Re:And here's an irony.... by tftp · · Score: 1
      allow non-commercial distribution

      Come back when Exeem team starts charging you per album downloaded.

      What they do is no different from charging for your Internet access, or for the computer that you use. They charge for the tool, but not for the content. The content is still free, and as long as neither eXeem nor you charge your peers for each download you should be OK.

    2. Re:And here's an irony.... by Xtifr · · Score: 1
      The Dead's license for their concert recordings specifically forbids using it to attract ad revenue.

      From http://www.dead.net/hotline_info/NEW_DOCUMENTS/mp3 .html

      STATEMENT TO MP3 SITE OPERATORS
      The Grateful Dead and our managing organizations have long encouraged the purely non-commercial exchange of music taped at our concerts and those of our individual members. That a new medium of distribution has arisen - digital audio files being traded over the Internet - does not change our policy in this regard. Our stipulations regarding digital distribution are merely extensions of those long-standing principles and they are as follow:
      • No commercial gain may be sought by websites offering digital files of our music, whether through advertising, exploiting databases compiled from their traffic, or any other means.
      • All participants in such digital exchange acknowledge and respect the copyrights of the performers, writers and publishers of the music.
      • This notice should be clearly posted on all sites engaged in this activity.
      • We reserve the ability to withdraw our sanction of non-commercial digital music should circumstances arise that compromise our ability to protect and steward the integrity of our work.

      (Emphasis mine.) This license has been adopted/adapted by many other bands as well. And the fact that it refers to "websites" is the reason that I emphasised the parts about how this is all part of their longstanding policy. The fact that a new form of digital distribution (peer-to-peer, rather than on a fixed website) has arisen does not change their policy neither.
  75. More than a little skeptical... by XeRXeS-TCN · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well firstly, it's already been said in previous Slashdot posts that it's a company responsible for this, who the former owner of Suprnova has some sort of agreement with, which gives them credibility that they don't necessarily deserve (yet.)

    But in the grand scheme of things, the client isn't open source, so you really don't know what's going on in there. And what's worse, the EULA revokes your right to disassemble / reverse-engineer the software, so they may well crack down on anyone trying to distribute an open source version:

    b.In addition to those prohibitions contained elsewhere herein, you agree you will not: ... (iv) modify, alter, decompile, disassemble, reverse engineer or emulate the functionality, reverse compile or otherwise reduce to human readable form, or create derivative works of the Software without the prior written consent of Swarm or its licensors, as applicable

    Secondly, from the privacy policy:

    Personal Data Collection and Use The collection of personally identifiable data on this site by Exeem.com is only gathered from information that has been submitted to Exeem.com freely and deliberately by site users. Exeem.com reserves the right to use this data in the following ways:

    ...

    Third Party Advertising
    The ads appearing on the Exeem.com Web site and within eXeem(TM) application are delivered by our web advertising partner, Cydoor. Information about users of eXeem(TM) and Exeem.com, such as the number of times they have viewed an ad (but not user name, address, or other personal information), is used to serve ads to users.

    So the app spams you with ads, and what's worse, Wikipedia has this to say about Cydoor:

    Cydoor is a spyware program that causes popup and pop-under ads to be displayed while you are browsing the Internet. It also re-routes your web requests through third-party servers for the purpose of capturing your web surfing habits.

    So you're not only spammed with ads, you're installing spyware. This is confirmed by eXeem Lite's FAQ:

    2. Does eXlite contain spyware?
    eXlite was sorely made to take out the spyware from eXeem so to make it clear eXlite does not contain spyware.

    A closed source, advert spamming, spyware installing pile of crap that you are expressly forbidden from reverse engineering... sounds like a whole barrel of laughs.

    As far as I'm concerned, eXeem can go and fornicate itself with an iron stick.

    1. Re:More than a little skeptical... by DanMc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't have to license the application to reverse engineer the protocol.

      I have a big network and a strict usage policy. If my network users want to license the software and use it on my network, I peek at the traffic on my wires, and even compare that with screenshots of the licensed user's desktops.

      They're distributing the app to the public, and intentionally sending the traffic over the public Internet. They have no expectation that non-licensed users will not look at the traffic and figure out what it's doing.

  76. I have a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't even do half-assed wine emulation to run this kind of thing. Way to take an open source and open platform protocol and make a spyware ridden windows program with it dudes. I never used Suprnova anyway, I stick to sites which require user logins and have a real community.

  77. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where are the mod points when you need them ?

  78. We won't tolerate spyware by GweeDo · · Score: 1

    In response to their lame inclusion of spyware in this application everyone should post this link (or one like it): http://www.spywareguide.com/product_show.php?id=7 in: irc://irc.suprnova.org/suprnova.org Enjoy...it is too bad suprnova is dead :(

  79. Linux console version on the way by Guspaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    From within the program: "Future updates will include bug fixes, more customizable program, skinning program, linux console version, and additional functions to ease the use of the program! "

    So there you have it, your headless linux version is on the way. And of course there is always WINE.

  80. how it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eXeem seems to work by keeping a list of peers in the registry. on installation, the list is preloaded with a set of central servers with bizarre dns names like domina.joethelover.com, muffin.tropicalbambus.com, godzilla.sloppyslippers.com and carrot.tomato6pack.com (incidently they all seem to resolve to the same host - 83.149.87.156 located in the netherlands). on the first run, these servers are contacted and act somewhat like normal bittorrent trackers (just a basic peer discovery service). they return a list of other peer's addresses and ports, which is stored so they don't need to be consulted on every run.

    the downsides to this arrangement are:

    a) this single host is a prime target for legal and network attacks. if it were to be taken down, no new people could join the network.

    b) there's a possiblity that the list of peers goes so stale that reconnecting to the network is impossible. maybe exeem will try the above central servers again in this case. if not, it's very very possible that the network will splinter and split.

    -bg9k

  81. pffff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok , so it supports torrents, but includes cydoor
    crap so you can get ads.

    here is what i want.
    no fcsking ads.
    a decntralized torrent client, that masks your IP and does not contain logs anywhere.
    now that will be a much nicer clients.

    so they took some good elements of torrent, but did not improve on it. and the worst elements of other p2p software.

    bleh

  82. Summary by UlfGabe · · Score: 2, Informative

    Has cydoor apps - a spyware company.

    Relies on ad revenues, is NOT open-source, uses a non-bittorrent-compatible file format, runs in Linux on an emulator..... two words, -> NOT GOOD.

    --
    Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
  83. eXeem and the selling out of the BT community by ilf · · Score: 1
  84. Not by SuprNova.org by BobPaul · · Score: 4, Informative

    This program is NOT written by the guys at SuprNova.org. It is simply endorsed by the guys at SuprNova.org. Listen to the radio interviews with for verification.

  85. Naysayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else forsee the doom of the technology for simply being mentioned on Slashdot? I always thought that would be an obvious effect. Mentioning it on slashdot is like broadcasting what our new secret weapon is before we can even use it. I see things crashing down on Exeem faster than any other Torrent related program or site simply because of this article, and its previous association with Suprnova

  86. eMule? by starm_ · · Score: 1

    Please can someone tell me what is the difference with this and eMule

    1. Re:eMule? by pin0 · · Score: 1

      speed?

  87. A honeypot isn't needed by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    a)You don't need to set up a honeypot. Any public tracker will just tell you the IP addresses of anyone connected to it. It would be effortless to gather that data over a period of time and identify some heavy users (particularly seeders) to pursue seriously.
    b)For all intents and purposes Bittorrent operates over well defined ports anyway.

    I simply can't see how Exeem can make it easier to automate the process of suing people. Everything with bittorrent happens in plain sight at a well known address.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:A honeypot isn't needed by sbma44 · · Score: 1

      a) For an individual torrent, yes. But that's just one infringement. With Exeem you can plausibly identify all users over a large section of network at once. That'll make the process much easier, instead of the serial, torrent-by-torrent approach that would be required in the past.

      b) Not for my intents and purposes

      P2P requires standardization, and standardization allows for tracking. Yes, an aspect of BT is centralized, but on a per-torrent basis. So I still think the existing setup is better -- not for the people running the trackers, I suppose, but for the users.

      In any case, it sounds like Exeem is an adware-riddled piece of junk, so the point is somewhat moot.

    2. Re:A honeypot isn't needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a)You don't need to set up a honeypot. Any public tracker will just tell you the IP addresses of anyone connected to it. It would be effortless to gather that data over a period of time and identify some heavy users (particularly seeders) to pursue seriously.

      Just because a filename says "Spiderman 2" or whatever doesn't prove it is actually the Spiderman 2 movie. So to prove infringement, the company doing the monitoring would probably need to at least join the torrent long enough to download the whole thing.

  88. Re:Oh NO! This is TERRIBLE NEWS!!! by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    The company that created Exeem is located in the carribean. The MPAA/RIAA can't touch them.

    The site/servers seem to be hosted in the netherlands. The RIAA/MPAA might be able to get something done there, but that won't stop Swarm Systems from moving their servers to another country, even the carribean.

  89. So, what legitimate legal use does this have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what legitimate, legal use does this program have? Yep, I didn't think so.

    - Sam

  90. Yeah, but what if... by DrYak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's a big probleme with commercial application going to linux. For most enterprises : "Linux" = "A windows compatible x86 machine running Linux instead of Windows". I bet their linux console version will be just a x86 binary, compiled on a Fedora Core machine (a that could run maybe on SuSE Linux if you fix a couple of missing libraries). Hello ! There a lot of other architectures on which Linux runs ! And this specially important for internet related software, because there's a lot of MIPS-powered hardware hacked to run Linux. (I'm not speaking about the Linksys WT54G - it doesn't have a harddisc. I'm speaking about a lot of Linux+MIPS based file servers running Samba. They are good candidate to run p2p downloaders). And I won't even mention Wine : It requires a X11 server and it's everything but what is needed for a headless server.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Yeah, but what if... by akb · · Score: 1

      Asus, Belkin and other manufacturers are selling units based off of the same design as the WRT54G that include a USB port. Some of the vendors support attaching storage, a USB hard drive, flash drive, etc. Of course putting linux on it allows you to do whatever one wants.

      The custom firmwares that I've seen are not at the level of what is available for the WRT54G but they will likely be soon.

    2. Re:Yeah, but what if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're also forgetting all the OS X users who like to use the CLI apps. Often the linux source compiles all right. (eDonkey was an example I think)

    3. Re:Yeah, but what if... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      The difference is in market share. Of the percentage of users running Linux on a desktop, I'm sure the percentage that run on non-x86 is inconsequential.

      Come on now, be reasonable. Any company releasing desktop software for linux is already catering to what, 1% of the desktop market? Less? Asking them to support 1% of that 1% is insane. There's no point expending the resources for something a handful of people will use.

    4. Re:Yeah, but what if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I don't have any problem with file sharing in itself, including copyrighted works. However, talking about this guys as if they're a legitimate business is just stupid.

    5. Re:Yeah, but what if... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention those of us with sparc or alpha hardware hooked up to huge fibrechannel disk arrays, which are absoloutely perfect for downloading files onto. That's exactly what i do anyway, on solaris irix and linux.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:Yeah, but what if... by DrYak · · Score: 1
      Asking them to support 1% of that 1% is insane.


      Look on the grand-parent poster :
      - The question wasn't : "We need the commercial software to support every last single CPU on which Linux could run, even ARM powered GBA, or IBM/Citizen's Linux-on-a-Watch (tm), or Korg's synth, or..." -(which is completly impossible)
      - The question was that we STILL need an open-source implementation of Exeem, EVEN if they make a Linux console one and even if the windows client runs perfectly under wine.
      Because it's very likely that *their specific application* will be Linux-x86 only (even if they have good reasons to do so as you pointed out), and because we need an open-source one for portability reasons, especially in a field (webPC, servers, routers, ...) were there's much more chance to find a unusual CPU as with other (Desktop PC).

      And about the market share myth :
      - These days with globalisation and such, even the smallest market share is significant.
      Want an example ?
      - In China only 0.1% of population is interested in European soccer. Guess what ? That still makes several hunderd thousand of chineese customers !
      And the ad providers where very happy to know that so much chineese where watching their ads.

      - If compagnies are neglecting so much Linux, IT'S NOT BECAUSE OF THE SMALL %. Even with a small %, there's still a lot of people to do business with, specially if it's on-line. (Think : There are still compagnies dealing with AmigaOS softwares !!!)
      No. The only reason is that most enterprise prefer to concentrate their effort on 1 single concurrent. That's it. Even if Linux was 30% of market they won't support it, because easier to think just aboute the 65% Windows users. Linux will only get interest from compagnie if it could manage to get past 60%.
      - Meanwhile, the current 5%-10% people using linux are far more than enough. It's a community big enough to do open-source development, and we've got everything we need. No need for commercial compagnies. (Hell ! If AmigaOS or DreamCast users can survive by them-self why won't we ?)
      --
      "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  91. Yes, sir. by DrYak · · Score: 1
    You are aware that humans coded your managed language right?


    Yes I do.
    As I do know that buffer overruns aren't the only available way to compromise a system.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  92. The first thing that came to mind... by BelDion · · Score: 1

    Suprnova.. Torrent happiness right?

    RIAA/MPAA: Close Suprnova!
    Suprnova: No! Fair use! Fair use!
    RIAA/MPAA: We'll sue your pants off in court.
    Suprnova: ...Fair use. You leave us alone.
    RIAA/MPAA: Even if we lose, you'll be bankrupt.
    Suprnova: Ok. We give up.
    RIAA/MPAA: Good. Now, produce a "decentralized" P2P program that lets us find all the old ladies and 9 year olds who are trading mp3s and movies and destroy their souls forever with our blade of lawsuits +5!
    Suprnova: But... Damn... Pwned...

    --

    I am BelDion's .Sig; Who the hell is Jack?
  93. Slow by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    I hope their new trackerfree bittorrent network will be faster it takes to download their program...

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  94. /P[riv]+acy/ by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 2, Funny

    How well does it protect the person sharing or seeding the file?

    It doesn't. But fortunately it is irrelevant for us, for we only use torrent to download Knoppix ISOs and Linux kernels in the first place, right?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  95. Bit torrent 2 will crush this by Nmcsween · · Score: 1

    eXeem has nothing going for it except for the de-centralized tack on. Theres also the fact that the network is NOT opensource meaning only eXeem can connect to the eXeem network. My personal opinion: Waste of time and effort.

  96. Torrent? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    official torrent download link ...

    Torrent is so 2004. Don't you have an eXeem download link?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Torrent? by yahyamf · · Score: 1

      of course you meant
      In Korea, only old people use .torrent files

  97. NOT Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the FAQ:

    "Is Exeem Open Source?

    No, Exeem is not open source."

    That means that it doesn't work on my platform, won't share with people I want to share with on other platforms, and it's against my Free Software principles too. So, to quote Good Will Hunting, "I'm holding out for something better." :)

  98. suprnova replacement by smash · · Score: 1
    OK, so its not quite so basic... but...
    1. Fire up google
    2. Type in
      "stuff i am looking for" filetype:torrent
    3. THis will go find "stuff i am looking for torrents

    smash.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  99. hm by DoktorTomoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    hmmm ... windows only hmmmmm ... source unavailible hmmmmmmmmm ... ADWARE *peeks over to azureus* hm, does the thing just as good. And why would I want decentralized bittorent when I'm just downloading distribution ISO files?

  100. Runs Great In VPC On OS X by lordDallan · · Score: 1

    eXeem Lite 0.18

    Giving it a spin in VPC7/Win2ksp4 on 10.3(Panther) and it seems to run great, even in the background.

    And since it's a virtual machine, I don't really care if it gets mucked up.

  101. Re: Torrent sites by alphageek101 · · Score: 1
    Somebody posted this link yesterday. It contains a list of close to 100 links to currently operating torrent sites. Definately worth bookmarking!!

    http://www.slyck.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=8690/
  102. Re:Woohoo by wojci2 · · Score: 1

    I saw this post on the libtorrent mailing list a while ago.
    If its true, the authors of Exeem modified libtorrent and used it in their application. I am sure that the authors of libtorrent are quite happy that some people can earn money by advertising using some of their work.

    --


    /wojci
  103. I'm Looking for somethine like WASTE by mesach · · Score: 1

    I wish it was easier to find something that can be controled like WASTE.

    I'm trying to setup a private network between me and a couple of friends, but it needs to be cross platform because some have mac's and some use linux. the problem is WASTE's Mac client sucks and none of the people who use Mac's can get it to work it just crashes constantly.

    Anyone have any suggestions?

    --
    moo.
    1. Re:I'm Looking for somethine like WASTE by zootm · · Score: 1

      Traditional filesharing apps over a VPN of some type might work here? I've never had to use VPNs on Macs so I'm not sure of the details, to be completely honest. It would be nice to have a cross-platform WASTE client, I agree - I like that system.

  104. horrible program by Punker22 · · Score: 1

    how is this better than KaZaA i mean the creator even said it's going to be ad loaded? i'm definatly not installing this.

  105. Use correct predicates please... 8-) by IBitOBear · · Score: 1

    No, the record industry's Nazis will come kicking down your door for distributing anything that can be mistaken for copyrighted music by title, size, or popularity; or for that matter anything that catches the eye of an untrained lawyer-drone awash with dreams of averice.

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
  106. Why I like BitTorrent by drigz · · Score: 1

    I like BitTorrent because you can start a torrent, it runs at 50-100% of http speeds, and finishes quickly. I don't like other p2p apps, because downloads take ages to start, and when they do they go slowly, even for popular files (maybe because of my router, but the point remains). So, I start up eXeem (with wine). I try to download remove_cydoor_from_exeem.exe. I wait. I wait some more. Has the download started? No.

    Not impressed.

  107. MOD PARENT DOWN, COPY AND PASTE OF OLD POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  108. The protocol by br00tus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    With all this talk of spyware, open source and so forth I've taken a look at the protocol, using WINE and tcpdump. I might use a tool other than tcpdump later.

    Anyhow, I've booted it up a few times. When I click refresh on new files, it starts making TCP/IP connections to port 4000 of various hosts. I then send the TCP/IP header plus the packet itself. In hexidecimal value, these packets usually begin "02-04-05". Then I send "b4-04-02-08-0a". Then I send "00-XX-XX-XX-00-00-00-00-01-03-03-00". The X's change each connection - they seem to be incrementing. So that's my handshake. The response also begins "02-04-05" with 9 bytes after that. Then I send 10 bytes. That's when the remote host starts sending me big packets.

    Well, I just started looking at it so it's still a mystery although I think I've seen some patterns. Anyhow, anyone interested in this can discuss it here, or go on the usual Freenode IRC channels (#p2p-hackers, #bittorrent etc.)

    1. Re:The protocol by phreakuencies · · Score: 1

      Hey, I've read some posts that said that Exeem prohibited the dissasemble or reverse-ingeneering. I'm not protecting Exeem, I'm just saying that I'd be careful about publishing this info. Well... after all I'm just a(nother) paranoid

    2. Re:The protocol by br00tus · · Score: 1
      I did a strings on the exe and client.dll. In the DLL I found what appeared to be Crypto++. It appears to be using Blowfish.

      I also found calls to Cybergold, Cydoor and the like.

    3. Re:The protocol by Troncek · · Score: 1

      Try to reinstall the program and to a New files refresh search. The first time the event log should say something like "sending node request to the network". Try to check out the packets flow at that point. Once you do the first file search the program already has node information from users. The first time is critical IMHO.

  109. Re:Oh NO! This is TERRIBLE NEWS!!! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    The company that created Exeem is located in the carribean. The MPAA/RIAA can't touch them.

    It would help if you explained why? :-)

    You mean, as in no airport? lol, just kidding ;-)

    I mean, they've managed to take international actions before, quite recently.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  110. Re:What piracy? P2P is 100% legit! by ryusen · · Score: 1

    naaah.. everyone HERE uses p2p for perfectly legal stuff

    it's the people on other sites that use P2P for illegal activities.

    --

    I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
  111. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an excellent explanation of the problems and solutions to peer to peer privacy.

  112. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I scanned with my Ad aware SE ( newest update) and it didnt pick up any spyware after installing Exeem..

    1. Re:hmmm by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      "I scanned with my Ad aware SE ( newest update) and it didnt pick up any spyware after installing Exeem.."

      I love how all the posts in this thread claiming that there's no spyware in Exeem are made by that infamous Anonymous Coward.

      A thought has just occurred to me. Do you know who will use Exeem? The idiots that have been using Kazaa and all the other spyware-laden p2p apps. The smarter ones that have been using BT, avoiding spyware and closed networks, will continue to use BT. The p2p community doesn't need Exeem. It's just another Kazaa, Bearshare, or Morpheus. Enjoy your spyware, folks. It's all yours.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
  113. Or Not... by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

    As far as i can tell (and adaware can tell), there isn't any spyware installed, at least no outside of the exeem executable itself. No such DLLs exist... no such registry addresses exist... of course i don't care much about my windows partition anyway i figure they just use said company for ads, and maybe when they're out of beta they'll add that nice spyware, but so far no ads even show up so i don't think they've even integerated anything from CyDoor yet

  114. Looks promising by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

    I admit, I was very skeptical about eXeem but after giving it a quick try, i'm pleasantly surprised. Of course, I'm going to uninstall it immediately and clean my computer from the filth that is cydoor but i'm getting eXeem lite as soon as it comes out.

    If people flock to it, this'll be the greatest p2p app yet.

  115. SHHHHH! by Japong · · Score: 2, Funny

    ON'T-DAY ENTIONMAY IRATEPAY BAYAY! Now repeat after me: "With Suprnova gone I don't even know where to go to get my .torrent files. I can't seem to find them after the **AA shut down all my favorite copyright-infringing sites. Instead of downloading Elektra and Ashlee Simpson's new album, I purchased them from a retail store at the manufacturer's suggested retail price. Thank you MPAA and RIAA for making the world a better place. You can rest easy knowing you've stopped piracy forever."

  116. Sloncek: A name to now be synonomous with L8m3. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wherever he goes and hides from now on, his credibility rating just dropped way below absolute zero for this. Let these words always follow him around;
    Sloncek - YOU are now the very definition of L8m3. Forever.

    Someone out there with a crowbar, find him and tell him that personally.

    1. Re:Sloncek: A name to now be synonomous with L8m3. by zerOnIne · · Score: 1

      what the heck is "lateme"? that's the best conjure i could come up with for "L8me". surely you don't mean "lame", right?

      --
      09
  117. Re:Oh NO! This is TERRIBLE NEWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see here

    In order to take international action, they need the consent of governments in those countries. Some just don't give a damn or don't like the US trying to be international police. Sweden, i guess, is one of these. RIAA/MPAA/Corporate America can do nothing, as they have no jurisdiction.

  118. Re:Woohoo by Mind+Booster+Noori · · Score: 1
    I don't believe: the day they did that, a fork would appear... without ads.

    More, this doesn't give us anything more than the traditional p2p proggies, so why use it?

    Hmm, let's see...
    There are three generations of p2p protocols. The 1st are the centralized protocols. This isn't. The 2nd are descentralized. The 3rd gives us stuff like efficiency, reliability and anonymity. This doesn't.

    I undertand why thy did this (I'm quite sure they'll win some good money with it...) but I don't understand why will people still use old-generation p2p proggies...

    Take a look on GNUnet, Freenet, I2P, Entropy...

  119. Ugh. by FyberOptic · · Score: 1

    I only have one word to describe this program: UGH.

    Do I say this because the program itself is bad? Not really. I only ran it once, played around with it a little, and decided I might use it sometime if I had a hard time locating something on gnutella and such.

    Now I generally use Avant as my browser, but by pure coincidence, I happened to open up IE this evening. After closing it, I got some kind of popup for some comedy place. An icon appeared in my system tray. Then another popup. I suddenly realized what had happened.

    UGH is to describe the fact that eXeem is now classified as garbage software in my book. The very idea that they would include spyware and adware with it has tarnished their reputation with me forever. It's just plain wrong to distribute trash like that with an application.

    I decided to give Microsoft's AntiSpyware a run for its money and started it up. LOW AND BEHOLD, the spyware and adware started being detected. I want to point out that I ran this very scan only a few days ago, with nothing found. Nothing has been installed since which would have installed this stuff. And since eXeem is known to install adware/spyware, I know that it's responsible for ALL of this garbage, as I'm very very careful as to what I put on here for that very reason.

    I actually want to give kudos to Microsoft for it doing such a good job at finding and removing everything. They did some good work with this program it seems.

    Just to note, one of the pieces of junk in particular is said to allow other software to be downloaded and installed. WTF? Who writes this garbage?

    I'll tell you who. Greedy, greedy people. The internet is becoming overrun with ads by such people. Even television is being raped by ads, which appear all over your television shows while you're trying to watch'em. The same is happening with websites, where these Flash ads will appear all over the screen when you're trying to see something. It's pathetic. What has our media come to? But the worst evil of all of this is adware.

    So, I say this to every person out there that sees this and writes adware/spyware. I'm anxious for the day when the laws come into place, which will send you all to jail. This is where you deserve to be, for writing this virus-like software. It's no less destructive than anything else any "hacker" puts together, with the exception of sticking ads in peoples faces. There's no excuse for it, and people won't tolerate it.

    I suggest that everyone boycott eXeem in whatever way possible. Don't use it, don't mention it (at least in anything other than negative light), refuse advertisements on your sites for it, don't let people link to it on comments or forums (by editing the post to remove the url or something, or posting a follow-up about the adware), etc.

    And I don't just mean this particular program. I'm talking about all the software of this nature which installs junk like this. If enough people spread the bad word about them and prevent anyone from possibly downloading it, these people will slowly get forced out of business. I have no problem with these people standing in the unemployment line to look for real jobs.

    The fact of the matter is, if something isn't done about the explosion of advertising, there's just not going to be anything left BUT ads.

    1. Re:Ugh. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      It isn't really nice for a thief to complain about other bad guys doing bad things to him when he's stealing shit. In other words, trust no one.

  120. Cydoor removal/eXeem Review by Prospero424 · · Score: 1

    While it indeed sucks that not only is this software not open source, but also includes spyware, at least it still seems to work just fine after removing Cydoor. While it holds promise, the lack of an open source project (especially when it includes GPL code, grrrr) will certainly hinder its progress. Now, if the authors actively moderated the network like they did Suprnova,org, I could see the justification for ad revenue, but this would open them up to legal liability, obviously, so that's not going to happen. We'll see how the peer review feature works. The implementation in eMule works fairly well (though far from perfect) so at least there's hope. eMule is still, IMO, the most technically impressive network, especially when considering the incredible success of Kademlia But it's just so much slower than Bittorrent and uses so many connections and ports that every single software firewall I have tried has caused speed problems with it and/or excessive CPU/memory usage. This is why I have high hopes for eXeem; the speed and leanness of the bittorrent protocol when compared with others if its generation.

  121. Remove Spyware from eXeem... by authenticgeek · · Score: 1

    While installing eXeem, simply agree to the license agreement for the spyware and then on the next screen click 'cancel' - you continue with the config process without installing any spyware at all. I've done a searh and had it running for a few minutes now. No ads within the app and Ad-Aware confirms that my system lacks spyware. Somehow, I doubt this'll last very long.

  122. exeem is a steaming pile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exeem is not free software.
    exeem is not open source software.
    exeem is not your friend.

    exeem IS a million headaches waiting to happen.
    exeem IS a steaming pile of crap piece of software designed by retards who love to do nothing more than turn peoples computers into broken piles of shit that do nothing but comprimise the privacy of the owner and make money for the shit piles that think their human that make this garbage.

  123. Protocol? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    Says based on bittorrent protocol: Not the case. It's based on the bittorrent IDEA.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  124. To everyone complaining about Cydoor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do a little research guys. Cydoor is actually a respecteble ADware comapny now. NOT spyware. If you don't want to use it because you choose not to believe, then fine. Anyone who visited suprnova.org before got ads from the EXACT same ad company.

    1. Re:To everyone complaining about Cydoor by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      "do a little research guys. Cydoor is actually a respecteble ADware comapny now. NOT spyware. If you don't want to use it because you choose not to believe, then fine. Anyone who visited suprnova.org before got ads from the EXACT same ad company."

      Yet another AC defending Cydoor and Exeem. I wonder if he works for Exeem or Cydoor. My odds are on Exeem, as Cydoor doesn't much care what people think of them.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    2. Re:To everyone complaining about Cydoor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya or neither.

      I'm just smart enough to know what the dif between spyware and adware is. Just coz cydoor has been evil in the past doesn't mean they can't change. No1 likes ads, but no1 is forcing you to use this either. I was simply saying anyone saying it's spyware ridden has no clue. Any decent anti-spyware/adware utility will remove the cydoor parts that get installed anyhow.

    3. Re:To everyone complaining about Cydoor by aero2600-5 · · Score: 1

      "I'm just smart enough to know what the dif between spyware and adware is. Just coz cydoor has been evil in the past doesn't mean they can't change. No1 likes ads, but no1 is forcing you to use this either. I was simply saying anyone saying it's spyware ridden has no clue. Any decent anti-spyware/adware utility will remove the cydoor parts that get installed anyhow."

      First off, the odds of a company changing it's business practices are slim to none if the current practice is bringing in profits.


      Second, you're absolutely right. No one is forcing me, or anyone else to use it.

      Third, you say it has no spyware. It communicates with Cydoors servers while eXeem is running. I don't know what it's sending, but it could be anything. That may not be the official definition of spyware, but it certainly is in my book.

      And finally, you also say that any decent anti-adware/spyware utility will remove it. You're right, it does, but it's promptly re-installed the next time you run eXeem. If that's not sneaky and underhanded, I don't know what is. Cydoor is not to be trusted, that is unless you're paying them for user data or advertising. Then I'm sure they're very nice to you.

      Aero

      --
      Please stop hurting America -- Jon Stewart
    4. Re:To everyone complaining about Cydoor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at what it is installing. It ONLY contacts there servers to download a couple of ads every now and then. THATS IT. How is that different then any other ad supported app/website out there? I understand your inability to trust Cydoor, but just do a little research on your computer man. it is NOT sending anything personal to cydoor, it is not flooding your computer with popups (like SPYWARE does), and it is not acting ANY different then SuprNova.org did before. (EXACT same company delivered the ads, it was just to a website instead of client software)

      Reinstall's the next time you run it? No it doesn't. IF your spyware software is picking up ANYTHING at all, it's picking up the folder where ads are cached.

      Oh well this is a pointless argument. Just sick of everyone spreading rumors and shit that is not true. ADWARE does not equal SPYWARE.

  125. What independent music? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that the only files being traded through P2P were research papers, Linux distributions, and independent music files.

    Some would claim that "independent music files" are illegal, as the major music publishers have enough clout to talk a judge into believing that they own all possible melodies.

  126. Chicken and egg by tepples · · Score: 1

    Torrent is so 2004.

    And eDonkey is so 2003, but that's where all the (non-pornographic) amputee videos are.

    Don't you have an eXeem download link [to get eXeem]?

    Likewise, how do you compile your C compiler?

  127. BitTorrent has been re-licensed by tepples · · Score: 1

    Elaborate, please. BitTorrent itself is released under the MIT license.

    The license for BitTorrent 3.9.0 and later has changed to something called the "BitTorrent Open Source License". No, I don't know whether this new license is GPL compatible, because Google doesn't seem to find the text of the license anywhere on the web.

    1. Re:BitTorrent has been re-licensed by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      You can find the license from the beta tarball

      The "BitTorrent Open Source License", in its own words, seems to be derived from the Jabber Open Source License.

  128. Bram Cohen no longer works for Valve by jensen404 · · Score: 1
    The parent is correct.

    http://www.livejournal.com/users/bramcohen/7932.ht ml

    "I don't work for Valve Software any more, and haven't for a while."

    why?

    "I suggest reading The Mythical Man-Month, in particular pay attention to what it says about adding people to troubled projects."

  129. Re:of mlDonkey - Warning! Broken link/fake site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The proper link:
    mlDonkey

    Repeat: Do not follow parent link!

  130. Doesn't work worth shite. by TitusC · · Score: 1

    It may just be me... the fact that nobody else is complaining about it makes me think that it may just be me... but I can do searches, but never start a download. I can't see anything being blocked at my HW firewall.

    The FAQ says it can take an hour or so to start a download... say WHAT? Why don't I just use Azureus? By the time Exeem starts the download, I'll have already downloaded 2 or 3 copies of the files using Az!

    Yes, I've already removed the adware. And now goes the app...

  131. Why not get a JOB so you won't have to STEAL ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Why not get a JOB so you won't have to STEAL ? Seems like a reasonable question to ask. Can you answer it ? Or this no-job-no-pay the whole idea of OSs/Linux/FreeAsBeer ideal ?

  132. MODERATE PARENT DOWN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An X11 server. An.

    Moderate parent down. Grammatical mistake makes post complete garbage and not worth reading.

  133. So they haven't learned anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's unfortunate that they aren't opening this protocol as BitTorrent was.

    So they've cerated a new P2P network with the intetion of being the sole point of control? What's the point? If they're ever getting to anything like a decent network size then the sole point of control comes under legal or other attack. This is just stupid. They're obviously not interested in learning from the past. Complete waste of effort.

  134. Mod Parent Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spyware? Hardly. It installs adware, which is an entirely different thing.

    That should be a +6.

  135. port forwarding et al. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    okay, so i shouldn't give the non open-source
    camp any ideas, but it's been buggyinh me for a
    while now.
    you see i have this linux server (suse) and it's
    connected with one eth to the router. with another
    to the lan.
    now, my request would be to have a server version
    of the client :P that runns on the always-on
    server. now if someone wants to do p2p, instead
    of having to put up this forwarding rule (which
    can only forward to ONE machine at a time), why
    not "burden" the server? so to speak, connect
    to the local server, tell it what to get. maybe
    even turn of the workstation and let the server
    do the downloading over night ...
    yeah know and since we're having stupid ideas, why
    not make this p2p swarm program in java, which
    i can host on my local apache?
    thak you for your time! have a nice day!

  136. Re:Woohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hay i herd it has spiwar si tat tru????

  137. WARNING : MISSING DOT IN THE URL !!!! by DrYak · · Score: 1

    WARNIN :

    I DIDN'T CHECK MY URLS !!!
    There's a missing dot in the url :

    it should be http://www.mldonkey.net/ !!!

    Not wwwmldonkey.net

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  138. Thank you !!! by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Thank you for pointing me the error.

    I missed the first dot.
    The url should be :
    http://www.mldonkey.net
    wwwmldonkey.net is a fake/dialer site.

    (To AC: Of course I don't use the dialer.)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  139. BAD URL: Thank you by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Thank you for pointing the error :
    I made a typo and missed the first dot.

    The URL should be :
    www.mldonkey.net

    wwwmldonkey (no dot) is a FAKE/Dialer site.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  140. Re:Oh NO! This is TERRIBLE NEWS!!! by Atheraal · · Score: 1

    The eXeem central server is located in a trap-ridden lair, below an active volcano. Routinely infiltrated by secret agents, of course.

  141. SPYWARE ADWARE by Da_Weasel · · Score: 1

    Yea, the tool bar is spy ware. If they put it in the IE tool bar I wouldn't be at all suprised to find it tucked away in the application. Very disappointing coming from the people who gave us suprnova... *sign*

    --
    If you must!
    1. Re:SPYWARE ADWARE by Da_Weasel · · Score: 1

      *sigh* too... :P

      --
      If you must!
  142. Re:Oh NO! This is TERRIBLE NEWS!!! by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    So long as the blowers don't fail the service will stay up ;)

  143. Open mouth, insert foot... by yeremein · · Score: 1

    Apparently there are two libtorrent projects. One of them is GPL, and the other is BSD.

  144. Avoid at all cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok I installed it, didn't have time to bother with trying it out so I just ignored it for a few hours. I quickly noticed major computer slowdown and a few pop ups (also I could not get outlook to connect to my mail server for some reason??) I uninstalled it (fixed outlook problem) but not all the adware was removed. My attempts to remove it with spy bot and norton antiviris 2004 made the problem worse. I can't get that computer onto any network now (LAN or dialup) and I'm contemplating staying up all night to reinstall everything (have to find a few drivers first) but I'm praying I can find another option first. (It's a brand new comp and I finaly got it how I want it)