Slashdot Mirror


Recovering Domains from Negligent Registrars?

Mousit asks: "I am curious on how fellow Slashdot readers have dealt with negligent and unresponsive registrars. For a few years or so now, I've been using Jump Domain as my registrar for the domains I own and maintain. This was originally by choice, but for the last year or two it has been by force. I lost a domain to them early last year when I attempted to renew it and the automated process failed, putting it into a 'pending' status in wait for 'manual intervention' as the message told me. This intervention never happened, support tickets about it were never answered, and on top of it my money was never refunded. The domain simply lapsed, expired, and nothing was done about it. Have others experienced similar problems with Jump Domain or any other registrar, and what did they do to recover their domains? Is it even possible? Short of getting a lawyer, the options seem rather slim when a registrar decides to simply ignore you and eat your domains (and your money)." "Attempts to transfer my domains to other registrars failed for nebulous reasons which were always attributed to Jump Domain's fault and never satisfactorily explained, at least for the .com domains. Since I can't get JD to answer their support tickets, I have never been able to obtain the EPP codes needed for transfering .org domains. I am effectively trapped in Jump Domain's service, and I am losing domains one by one. The story is currently in repetition, with two more domains now stuck in "pending" status. Support tickets are again unanswered, and this time I even have a couple telephone numbers. One simply rings endlessly, while the other answers with a machine for Jump Domain Hosting support. My messages there have gone unanswered. One domain has already lapsed into expiration as of Saturday, the other will go this Thursday.

It's worth noting that Jump Domain used to be a reseller for TUCOWS, but they appear to have been dropped. They are now reselling for the sometimes infamous eNom instead. Considering even TUCOWS couldn't get a response out of JD during the previous lost domain episode, I'm not surprised they had to change. I have contacted eNom but was summarily told I need to deal with Jump Domain, and was given no further help from them."

430 comments

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Registrar vs Registrar by fembots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From my experience, it's quite effective if you find another registrar to take over the domain hosting. They're in the same business, and will go the extra mile to secure new clients.

    Most of the time it's because we don't know what/where to ask, that's why you need lawyers to defend even the most obvious case.

    1. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by Tebriel · · Score: 1, Redundant

      RTFA:

      "Attempts to transfer my domains to other registrars failed for nebulous reasons "

      --
      The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    2. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by Nos. · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you read teh article, you would see that the poster has alread tried this and had no luck. The domains are most likely in a "locked" state and they won't release the locks.

    3. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Informative
      As an addendum, I'd suggest making that other registrar Verisign. While they are expensive and have quite loathesome business practices of their own, they *are* the ultimate power for the .com and .net gTLDs. That should give them a little more leverage than other registrar in extracting your domains from Jump Domain's grasp.

      Once you've hopefully got all your domains moved over to Verisign you can then transfer them out to another, more cost effective and ethical registrar, at your convenience. While Verisign isn't the best at this, they have cleaned up their act considerably since their recent fiascos like sex.com, so you should be OK. You might have to pay a little over the odds for Verisign's services, but that's got to be preferrable to losing your domains altogether, hasn't it?

      Oh, and on the subject of sex.com, you should at least talk to a lawyer about this. You've lost several domains through the negligence of Jump Domain, and the sex.com owner made a killing (on paper) from a similar situation. While you are probably not in the same territory as that, that case might be enough incentive to convince a lawyer to take the case for you in order to wet his beak in a potentially lucrative damages claim.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      ...they *are* the ultimate power for the .com and .net gTLDs.

      is that like Real Ultimate Power?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by arkanes · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Theres a couple differences between this and sex.com:

      1) The original of sex.com is quite wealthy in his own right (porn king) and was able to pursue years of litigation and

      2) The sex.com domain was immensely lucrative, worth over a million dollars a year in advertising revenue. Payment for this lost money was the majority of the damages the original owner received.

    6. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually you cant use verisign as a registrar. they are the registry, not a seller of domains. they used to own netsol but no more.

    7. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Owning Network Solutions somehow precludes them from being a registrar?
      I don't get it.
      VeriSign owns NetSol.
      NetSol = Registar
      VeriSign = Registrar

    8. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Owning Network Solutions somehow precludes them from being a registrar?
      I don't get it.
      VeriSign owns NetSol.
      NetSol = Registar
      VeriSign = Registrar


      Sorry, but the parent post is correct. Verisign is a Registry, not a Registrar. Network Solutions is a Registrar, which Verisign used to own, but no longer does.

      Network Solutions was both a Registry and Registrar before Verisign bought them. They tried dropping the Network Solutions name, but then changed their minds, split the Registry and Registrar into two separate parts of the company, started using the Network Solutions name for the Registrar part, then sold Network Solutions to some management group.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    9. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, verisign doesnt own netsol anymore. nor is verisign a registrar. so how the hell are you gonna register a domain at verisign, as the parent post suggests, when not only is verisign NOT a registrar but verisign does not even OWN a registrar anymore.

      verisign ! owns Netsol.
      Verisign != Registrar

      maybe the parent post meant "use NetSol as a registrar", but that would be stupid since Netsol doesnt control com/net. Verisign does. the two companies are unrelated. so anyways, good luck "registering a domain at verisign". it cant be done.

    10. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is great, except that when you look under the hood for why other registrars have trouble, you often find that it's actually Verisign screwing things up for their competitors. Their monopolistic behavior has been awful.

      I'd actually suggest a lawyer contacting JumpDomain as a better alternative than Verisign.

    11. Re:Registrar vs Registrar by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      he original of sex.com is quite wealthy in his own right (porn king)

      I'm pretty sure that Gary Kremen, the original registrant of sex.com, got his money from founding the on-line personals site, match.com.

  3. so get the lawyer involved already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enough said

  4. Call the DA by EmagGeek · · Score: 4, Informative

    Personally, if a registrar took my money with the understanding that they would be providing me a service in return, and then did not provide that service with obvious willful abandon and intent to remove my intellectual property from my possession (my domain is my IP), I would consider that an egregious act of fraud...

    But that's just me.. Your DA may or may not believe otherwise...

    1. Re:Call the DA by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Your domain is not your IP, first of all. It is not your intellectual property, it's a name. A pointer. That's all.

      What you have a good case for is a theft by noncompliance, or possibly some other form of theft.

      However, your local DA isn't going to be very useful to you.

    2. Re:Call the DA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This on next week's episode of "Law and Order: Domain Registrar"

      (I can only picture the intro montage being full of pictures of people sitting in front of their computers)

    3. Re:Call the DA by pete6677 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you pay by credit card and the service is not delivered, dispute the charge. More likely than not, they'll make good on it at risk of losing their merchant account from repeat complaints.

    4. Re:Call the DA by EmagGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A domain registration can indeed be IP... especially (but not only) if it is a trade or service mark.

    5. Re:Call the DA by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny
      This on next week's episode of "Law and Order: Domain Registrar"
      Nah - The episode will be titled: "Law and Order: Jump Domain Jumped My Domain"
    6. Re:Call the DA by TyfStar · · Score: 1

      I'd dispute the charge just on the basis that they probably won't answer the dispute. They give them 3 days to respond. if you can't get someone on the phone.. I'm betting their snail mail isn't getting answered either.

      --

      "There is a reason Linux is free"

      ~me~

    7. Re:Call the DA by Tlosk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not really the issue, that's like telling someone to dispute the credit charge for someone who took their beloved dog to the vet and now the vet won't take your calls or return your dog.

    8. Re:Call the DA by danheskett · · Score: 1

      The domain name is not your IP, the trademark is your IP.

      The domain name is still a reference. For example, an index of websites (aka Google) can still copy it, and display it legally which is a provision designed to allow people who index trademark protected names to do so.

      The domain name is just that. The name of a domain - a part of the Internet. If it *happens* to co-incide with your real world tradmark, that's one thing.

    9. Re:Call the DA by Surt · · Score: 1

      Unless you love dogs in general, in which case trying to put the bad vet out of business (as large number of charge disputes will quickly do) may be the right strategy.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    10. Re:Call the DA by coronaride · · Score: 1

      I registered a domain through a discount registrar a few years ago and then decided that I didn't want to renew it. However, the plan was set up to renew automatically and you were not able to change this via their web interface - you had to call their toll number. I tried to call their number and could never get through to anyone. I sent numerous email and never received a reply so, of course, they renewed the domain and charged my credit card.

      I immediately called my credit card company to dispute the charge, telling them all of the measures that I took to try to stop the automatic renewal. Upon hearing my sob story, they credited my account. I got a letter in the mail from my credit card company about a month later stating that they had finally been able to contact the registrar, who simply stated that they had no idea that I wanted to cancel my account because they hadn't heard from me, but that they'd be glad to cancel it now - and keep my registration fee, of course. Of course, you realize, this made it into a case of their word against mine and, I have no doubt that all the credit card business the registrar does with them factored heavily on my credit card company's decision. Anyhow, my credit card company recharged me the amount plus an additional amount for filing a false claim. Oh, and I lost my domain registration anyhow...

      Maybe I just had a bad credit card company, but I would hesitate before doing that again...I'll just cancel both accounts (credit card and registration) next time.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, go into business for themselves.
    11. Re:Call the DA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could have done a little more to protect yourself. Have the phone company provide you with the record of the outgoing calls to their number, as well as send copies of all emails you sent to the registrar.

      Disputing a charge is not unlike going to civil court. You have to be able to prove by a preponderance of evidence that you were wronged.

      Having that, you can probably still go to small claims court.
    12. Re:Call the DA by coronaride · · Score: 1

      too much work for $50

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, go into business for themselves.
    13. Re:Call the DA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Document, document, document. It's within your rights to dispute the "decision" and the most express way to do that is to send the letter back with an addendum that documents all your attempts to contact the registrar. Actually, you should have included that documentation in your original dispute, then the registrar could not have claimed that they had not heard from you.

    14. Re:Call the DA by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Well, a lot of credit card companies will demand proof that you attempted to contact the business to terminate a repeating renewal contract.

      If you send the company a registered letter telling them to cancel the renewal, you have proof (if they pick up the letter) that they saw your request, and if they still refuse to do it, you have perfect grounds for a lawsuit.

      As far as the original poster goes, I'd do the same thing (if the site was valuable) - send registered betters to both network solutions and the registrar saying that you have requested a transfer for the domain and that failure to process the transfer, or if they allow the domain to lapse in the meantime, will be grounds for a lawsuit.

      I'm willing to bet that it'll be done within a week.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    15. Re:Call the DA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The domain name is still a reference. For example, an index of websites (aka Google) can still copy it, and display it legally which is a provision designed to allow people who index trademark protected names to do so."

      Except in France.
      (Actually, I think that 2600 got in trouble a few years back for linking to DeCSS, so there may also be cases here in the US of A where one can't legally display a domain name.)

    16. Re:Call the DA by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I had a similar experience when I joined a pre-Internet "online service provider". I couldn't get my account cancelled, so I told the credit card company not to honor any more charges from that provider. They were perfectly willing to reverse charges after the fact, but they simply didn't have a procedure for "don't accept any future charges from..." I finally had to close the account -- the only alternative to calling the credit card company every month, forever.

  5. Go...daddy by vvaduva · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sorry, but Godaddy has the best prices and service I could find. Their auto-renew works great and I never had any problems with them. And no...I don't own stock and my daddy doesn't work there...

    1. Re:Go...daddy by Darkstorm · · Score: 1

      Yep...godaddy is such a wonderfull place...until you wish to transfer the domain away from them. They deny the transfer (domain isn't locked, but they will lock it for you without telling/asking you) and don't even bother to send an email telling you they have denied a legitimate transfer request.

      Yep...got to love that.

      --
      If ignorance is bliss, the world is full of blissful people
    2. Re:Go...daddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the only problem with GoDaddy is how they have DomainsByProxy for their private registration, which DBP seems to have inept and incompetent customer service people.

    3. Re:Go...daddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry, but Godaddy has the best prices and service I could find.

      ...assuming you don't need DNS hosting, that is.

      Namecheap - eNom reseller, everything GoDaddy has plus DNS, offers WHOIS protection for only $2.88/year unlike GoDaddy's $9/year.

    4. Re:Go...daddy by cHiphead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i dont like the feel of godaddy, it frankly feels like im being spammed the whole time i use the site... check out registerfly.com (thought a bit on the slow real-time-site-response side from florida sometimes)

      Cheers.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    5. Re:Go...daddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GoDaddy is 8.95/domain... A full 49% increase over 1&1's $5.99 -- I've used them for a couple years, great service, never any problems, good service when I've had questions.

    6. Re:Go...daddy by ciscoguy01 · · Score: 1

      About Godaddy, you call them on the phone at 1 AM their time, they answer. They are helpful and immediately deal with whatever I called about.
      Which is a much better service level than the other four registrars I have used, and they are the lowest price too.
      Their web interface works great too.

      About that phone call thing: I often call a company I am considering doing business with, to see if I can get through. It's an important check on them before I jump in. And I often do it off hours as well. Just to test.

      The ability to get someone on the phone can become especially important in the event of problems, like the OP wrote about.

      And no, I don't have anything to do with Godaddy. I just like them better than the others I have used.

      --
      .
    7. Re:Go...daddy by boodaman · · Score: 1

      GoDaddy is a negative in my book, based on personal experiences.

      I can't say enough good things about Name Cheap (namecheap.com). They rock...only $8.88 per year per domain, and I've had domains lapsed many weeks (2-3 months) and they were able to pull them back from the "about to be released" pool (or whatever the official term is) and renew them for me.

      Fast customer support, and above all, they tell you what's going on when you ask a question, I've never gotten a boilerplate response from them.

      I have no relationship with Name Cheap other than as a very satisfied customer.

    8. Re:Go...daddy by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1


      I have domains at both namecheap and godaddy.

      I have no real complaints against either - but I prefer namecheap. a bit more money, but better features and a website that doesn't give me a friggen headache.

      For comparison's sake, I 've got a few dozen domains spread among 3 or 4 other registrars. They're not as good as either Godaddy or namecheap, IMHO.

  6. File a complaint, maybe? by d2_m_viant · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try filing a complaint with ICANN

    1. Re:File a complaint, maybe? by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why has this not yet been modded +5: Funny?

    2. Re:File a complaint, maybe? by Lendrick · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, 'cause ICANN definitely gives a fuck about the little guy.

    3. Re:File a complaint, maybe? by c0p0n · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Because there's only 1 minute of differeence between his/her post and yours?

      --

      Your head a splode
    4. Re:File a complaint, maybe? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Cmon, slashdot mods may be dumb, but that dumb?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:File a complaint, maybe? by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      they usually are, so don't mind, friend. Well, I am not that dumb when I'm moderating =P

      --

      Your head a splode
  7. Backordering? by iosmart · · Score: 5, Informative

    Depending on if anyone else is out there trying to grab your domain, I guess you can just let it fall and then buy it back through someone else. Or maybe you can try godaddy's back ordering system. This would also depend on if someone else is out there trying to grab it.

    1. Re:Backordering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GoDaddy's back-ording system is crap. i have over 90 domains. (50 w/go daddy) i wanted another one that was up for deletion that was registered w/godaddy so i signed up for the back-ordering system and they couldn't even secure the domain from their own registry. Probably works if there's no one else wanting it but otherwise, DON'T DEPEND ON THEM... and DON'T PAY FOR THE SERVICE!

    2. Re:Backordering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't use GoDaddy!!! We host 100+ domains and transfer them to TUCOWS as we get the opportunity. GoDaddy has a process that is like pulling teeth when you try to transfer from them. I think out of about 15 attempts, we've only been sucessful with 2 or 3.

      Also stay away from ItsYourDomain.com. I think thier real domain name is "itsOURdomain.comandwe'llletyoudosomethingwithitwh enwe'redamngoodandready.com". We've NEVER gotten a domain away from these guys.

  8. related question by RelliK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What are the good/bad domain registrars? Is there a comprehensive list with feedback somewhere?

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    1. Re:related question by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I've been pleased with 123reg.co.uk. They are relatively cheap, give competent access to update DNS entries, let you use your own DNS server (theirs as a secondary if you choose), and provide a simple mechanism for transferring a domain to another registrar if you should need to.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:related question by nitsua · · Score: 1

      I use domainmainmonger.com. Domains are cheap, so I go for service, then price. Domainmonger has the best service I have had from any company on the web. Definetly worth the price.

    3. Re:related question by sH4RD · · Score: 1

      Stick with Tucows (formerly OpenSRS) resellers. I had trouble with one once, so I just contacted Tucows (and unlike this registrar, which had already moved to eNom, they still did buisness with Tucows). They bitched a little to the registrar and my problem was quickly fixed.

      --
      WASTE - The Secure P2P
    4. Re:related question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use EasyDNS. Not the cheapest but I can manage my DNS entries remotely via their interface register new domains through their interface and run backup mail spoolers through their interface. I'm lazy if you haven't noticed and I don't have to worry about uptime of my home servers this way...granted if real life doesn't call then go with one of the others and spend your time grooming your home boxes. =)

    5. Re:related question by loraksus · · Score: 1

      I really like yi.org
      It is run by one guy afaik, but he's really quick to answer any questions / fix any problems, etc.
      It is a bit expensive, but it is nice not having to deal with tier one support people getting paid minimum wage.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    6. Re:related question by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      Godaddy.com is good. No problems so far.

    7. Re:related question by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 1

      Dotster is good.
      GoDaddy is good.
      MelbourneIT is good.
      Network Solutions is good.

      The cheapest usually isn't.

      --
      Quality Hosting e3 Servers
    8. Re:related question by MythoBeast · · Score: 3, Informative

      Avoid anybody who goes through Joker.com. Several IPS's have been using them as their registrar, and I have had to let a couple of my domains lapse and be re-registered in order to get them out of their clutches. They require a verification code in order to transfer .org domains, but won't tell you how to go about getting such a thing.

      --
      Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
    9. Re:related question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use EasyDNS as both my registrar and DNS host. They're great! As an example, when the northeast had that major power outage, I got an email from them appologizing that their support telephone line was down for an hour. That's just one of many examples of their dedication to customer service.

    10. Re:related question by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Godaddy.com is good. No problems so far.

      I agree. I've been with Godaddy for 5 years now, and I haven't had any issues so far. I've set my account up to automatically renew my domains every time they expire, and it works flawlessly. They send out emails at periodic intervals to let you know the status of your account. They also send actual letters to you to let you know about important issues that effect the domain name system, your privacy, etc. It seems like they actually care about their customers.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    11. Re:related question by v1 · · Score: 1

      I've been with register.com for several years now. They are a little more expensive than the cut-rates, but you get real serivce from them. They have a 1800 line that can get you to a human, and they can help you set up or fix your registry entries over the phone if needed. They also offer quantity discounts if you register for several years in advance. (I'm booked up until 2013) Also, you can dicker with them a bit on the phone if you are a customer of theirs and are signing up someone new - you can get them a lower rate if you ask for it.

      Register.com also will allow you to transfer registered domains to them that still have any number of years of paid registration already in place, at no charge. I asked them if this meant I could say, register somewhere cheaply for 9 yrs and then transfer the domain to them and reap the free 800 support for the next 9 yrs, and they said ya, some people do that.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    12. Re:related question by TimMann · · Score: 1

      gandi.net is good, and inexpensive: 12 euros/year.

      I orginally found it on a site that rated registrars, but I can't find that site anymore. Sigh.

    13. Re:related question by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I've been using GoDaddy for four years now, and have been nothing but thrilled with the service. They've even helped fix a problem that wasn't really their fault, but rather was due to a misconfigulated server at my ISP.

      1and1.com also registers domains; I use them for my web hosting, and have been equally happy with their service -- you get a Real Clueful Human Response to support queries. So one hopes that their domain registry service is similarly responsive.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    14. Re:related question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have had bad things about Joker also.
      - No replies to questions
      - The web-interface had bugs (wouldn't change contacts)

    15. Re:related question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12 euros used to be inexpensive, now it is up to $15.46! How dare gandi keep raising their rates! :)

  9. heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Well if you want a physical address i live near these guys and got curious and drove by their office :) It's not a big operation...

    1. Re:heh... by studerby · · Score: 4, Informative
      Elsewhere on the net (here) it's asserted:

      Jump Domain postal address, even in their corporate filings, is a MailBoxes, Etc. maildrop - 790 W. 40 HWY #197, BLUE SPRINGS MO 64015.

      --

      .sig generation error:468(3)

    2. Re:heh... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Well, you know, whois and all...

      790 W 40 HWY #197
      Blue Springs, MO 64015
      US
      831-305-6918 Fax: 831-305-6918

      Map from Google...

      The satellite shot looks like a strip mall...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:heh... by ReverendLoki · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What's even more amusing is this:

      Data Center:
      Lee's Summit, MO
      Note: For security reasons, we cannot disclose it's exact address.

      Now of course, anyone who knows Lee's Summit (I used to live there, still pass through it regularly) thinks of this place, an old AT&T plant, now turned over to a number of smaller businesses. Note: I'm of course not suggesting anything happen here, as I have friends and family working in that building (no, none for jumpdomain, if you must know).

      Now, I know a "data center" can also mean just a small office with a bunch of machines shoved into it, but despite that city's recent growth, I still don't know of any major location for a data center to live in Lee's Summit. If it's not there, then fine... keep the address quiet, fully understandable. However, if it *is* there, then their obfuscation is sort of like saying "I've hidden it in a 100 foot tall green statue of a woman in NYC, but I'm not telling you what it is, for security reasons" - sort of pointless.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a UPS Store.

    5. Re:heh... by ICECommander · · Score: 3, Informative

      The data center is here

      --
      All your Sybase are belong to us.
    6. Re:heh... by niteguy · · Score: 1

      There is a Fortune 500 company whose largest data center is in Lee's Summit, MO. I believe they have over 70,000 square feet of raised-floor space in this facility. Although it's difficult to turn office space into a top-notch data center, companies put data centers in the basements of office buildings all the time. Unless you're in the habit of driving around back and looking for diesel generators, how would you ever find them?

  10. Re:yea it happens. by nocomment · · Score: 1

    Ya I still remember trying to get InterNic to respond to anything. Getting a new domain used to be a HUGE process, now I can get a new one with a few click over at http://namecheap.org/ (shameless plug).

    If your domains are lapsing just go renew them at namecheap.

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  11. Always check beforehand by flawedgeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sorry to hear about your plight, but unfortunately usually the only option left when the company does not respond is to seek legal action. I'm hardly a lawyer, but you might be able to recoup some of your legal costs by suing the company for them, but might not be such a good idea against today's armies of corporate lawyers.

    This sort of thing is exactly why I only use domain registrars and hosting companies that either have independent, positive feedback or ones that my friends use. One should always do their homework before going into something like this.

    --
    My other Sig is .40 caliber.
    1. Re:Always check beforehand by Damiano · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If there are uncontactable they proably *don't* have an "army of corporate lawyers", but rather it's "Bob" working out of his mother's basement who have no attorney at all.

      The good side of this is that you'll win your case and get your domain name back. The downside is that they are most likely judgement proof and you won't actually recover any damages.

    2. Re:Always check beforehand by swilde23 · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that "their homework" had been done, but that the problem was the degnerative service JD had started to provide. You can't really expect a company to suddenly take a nosedive after reading through numerous good reviews. It was just unfortunate that "you" had to be the guinea pig for the rest of us.

      On topic I am not sure who you would complain to, but I certainly would open my mouth and let people know that I wasn't happy with a particular company's service. Slashdot seems a decent platform to voice your opinion :)

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    3. Re:Always check beforehand by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually if he sues them for his money in small claims court, they can't send armies of lawyers.......

    4. Re:Always check beforehand by 1024x768 · · Score: 1

      Not true in all states. In Michigan the defendant has the right to move the case from Small Claims Court to a higher court where they can be represented by a lawyer.

    5. Re:Always check beforehand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta tell ya, it's nice hearing someone else say what I've been saying for years. We've been a webhost/ISP for 10 years and struggle because "oh they're a local business so they must suck, they aren't even on TV" But if you talk to any single client we have, you'll find we have better support than they EVER got anywhere else before they came to us. Almost no downtime, and NO downtime without saying why either before or shortly after.

      What more could you ask for?

  12. Re:What I'd do by me+at+werk · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Well, considering the footer of their front page says:
    ©1997 - 2003 Jump Domain, LLC. All rights reserved.

    I'd say someone just forgot about it.
    --
    For context, click Parent.
  13. RTFP by qortra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He already has domains registered with Jump Domain. He does not want to abandon those domains, and he can't seem to transfer them. You could suggest a thousands amazing registrars, and it won't help him with this problem

    1. Re:RTFP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simmer down, Comic Book Man!

    2. Re:RTFP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      worst comment, ever

    3. Re:RTFP by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Except GoDaddy will probably be able to get it away from Jump Domain.

    4. Re:RTFP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA: "Attempts to transfer my domains to other registrars failed for nebulous reasons "

  14. Re:What I'd do by nocomment · · Score: 4, Funny

    hrmm it'd be funny to re-register jumpdomain.com with another registrar wouldn't it? :-P

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  15. Re:The Three Point Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot Parse Error, Paragraph 1: Option #3 of business plan not literal "Profit!". Re-enter.

  16. Small Claims Court? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, I'm assuming this is all occurring in the USA. If so, might it be possible to file a small claims action against them? The money is not large, but at least then you would have a legal decision on your side and perhaps help from the local prosecutors office (or sherrif) to enforce the judgement. It doesn't cost much to have a case heard in small claims court.

    1. Re:Small Claims Court? by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 1

      It costs $75.00 to $96.00 where I am at. Not really small for a domain name. You can recoup this if the other side pays, but if they don't and you just get a judgement then you are out the money.

      --
      Quality Hosting e3 Servers
    2. Re:Small Claims Court? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they probably won't even show up, and you will win for sure.

      You should be able to collect on the judgement one way or another. Maybe you can even sell the judgement some how. Sort of like selling a debt (that somebody owes you) to a bill collector.

      AC
      --

    3. Re:Small Claims Court? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it costs $40 plus service where I am. Top limit to the award is $5K (though the state Supreme Court is in the process of raising that to $7.5K). Once you get a judgment, then you garnish, garnish, garnish: wages, bank accounts, etc. Oh, and an FYI, the juice kicks in at judgment. Currently, it's 9% interest. Plus you can ask for costs and fees. Unless you're successful with a deceptive practices suit instead of a breach of contracts suit, then fees probably won't get included. Oh, and if you allege deceptive practices, you really should send a copy of the suit to the AG, if you're in IL, suing under the Illinois Compiled Statutes. Could be a fun case.

    4. Re:Small Claims Court? by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, 9% on $10.00 per year is how much to retire on? :(

      In ten years the interest would be enough to buy another domain!

      (Well, assuming there is no inflation on the price of the domain).

      --
      Quality Hosting e3 Servers
  17. whois by toonworld · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hmmm... someone is hiding ;-)

    IP Address: 216.21.228.13
    Maximum Daily connection limit reached. Lookup refused.

    --
    It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
    1. Re:whois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What on earth are you BLATHERING about???

  18. Meta-Moderators take notice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of moron jackass modded this "Redundant"?!! It's like the 4th post to the story, and is quite good advice.

  19. Registrars by usedcarsalesman.com · · Score: 0

    Register.com is expensive, but generally top notch service; use them for domains with personalized email. DotRegistrar is who I use for bulk registrations and they have been excellent too; great if you have several hundred domains you are maintaining year after year. No advice on your Jump registrar other than keep documents, send notice to ICANN abot the problem, and basically rip them apart on this board :)

  20. Re:The Three Point Plan by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    3) Therafter, as an example of them doing good, they would give you whatever you wanted as a publicity stunt to get their credibility back.

    Also known as suing your socks off in a defamation suit. Even if you're right, it'll cost ya.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  21. Re:The Three Point Plan by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny
    4) Mend fences with them by submitting a new story about how they made things right with you.

    5) Hemos posts a dupe of your original complaint.

  22. Re:The Three Point Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In print it's liable...

  23. Try eNom again by GafferFish · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try contacting eNom again, and explain that you have made multiple attempts to contact the registrar but have not received a response. Detail your attempts. eNom surely has a procedure for transferring domain names to themselves when a reseller goes out of business or is uncontactable. They may also be more willing to help if you can find some sort of proof that Jump Domains is no longer in business.

    1. Re:Try eNom again by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I think eNom may be the evil registar at the heart of my problems but am not entirely sure. I contacted them several times but never got any response.

      I tried to register a domain, kavlon.info, that has my unique trademark, kavlon, in it only to find out that it is already registered in my name but that I have no way to access that registration. Evidently it was some sort of blackmail gimmick to register the domain and then try to sell it to me.

      As it is in my name anyway though I think I should have the legal right to just cease that domain. Only problem is that I've had trouble tracking down the registar that actually controls the domain. I filed a complaint with the ICANN but have never gotten a response. :(

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    2. Re:Try eNom again by GafferFish · · Score: 1

      I just read an article on that. Yowch! What a lowly tatic! I'm surprised that isn't breaking some sort of regulation. Surely registering a domain name you never ordered in your name is fraud somehow?

    3. Re:Try eNom again by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      You'd think so. Also lovely is how ICANN's tool for finding a site's registar doesn't work on this one. I was just a little pissed. :p

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:Try eNom again by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      BTW thanks for the link to that article. That's exactly what happened to me. Good to see it documented so that I have something to work from. I contacted the company in charge of '.info' about the problem to see if they are any more responsive than eNom or the ICANN.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  24. Domain Registrars by some_yahoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have had no trouble at all with AllDomains.com. They notify me by mail and email when action is required, and they allow me to lock and auto-renew my domains brainlessly if I want. I'll give them a thumb's up, mostly because I just don't have to think about them - ever.

    --
    --- I'd rather live with false hope than with false despair.
  25. read the post more carefully by qortra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the grandparent is suggesting that the article's poster actually pose the same question to a third-party registrar (rather than slashdot), which isn't a bad idea at all.

    In other words, rather than just trying to transfer the domain using automatic means, he might try getting in touch with a third party registrar's service line. They might know the best way to get this resolved, and might even have certain mutual contacts that could easily put them in touch with Jump Domain.

    1. Re:read the post more carefully by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      In my experience, the registar under which you allowed the domain to elaspe holds onto its ownership. My guess is that the reasons for this are two-fold:

      1. If they made a mistake, they can correct it without trying to get the domain back from someone else.

      2. They can ransom the domain to the next guy in line for a heafty profit. (They seem to already do this with the .COM domains that are somehow more expensive than all other domains.)

  26. Jumpdomain has fallen off the face of the earth by Johannes · · Score: 5, Informative

    I and and some friends have had the same problems described by you and others.

    Jumpdomain is not a registrar and is simply a reseller for OpenSRS (older domains) and eNom (newer domains). This is good since it means you can end run around them to get your domains transferred.

    There have been three problems I've had transferring domains:

    1) The admin email address is setup to be an auto@domains.jumpdomain.com (or something similar) which doesn't end up being delivered to the actual admin of the domain. This causes all of the automated transfer emails to not get delivered. You can update this information through OpenSRS at www.adminchange.com. I haven't needed to do this with eNom, but I'm guessing they have a similar process.

    2) Domain is locked. This is done specifically to prevent the transfer of the domain and is usually a good thing, but in this case, it's preventing you from using your domain. The Jumpdomain admin interface worked for a few domains, but others I had to contact OpenSRS or eNom directly.

    3) No way to access the EPP code needed for EPP registries (like .org and .us). I had to contact eNom directly and after explaining it was for Jumpdomain, they immediately sent the codes out to me.

    I highly suggest doing all of this before your domain expires, since you'll need to rewew your domain before you can do any transfers (you might be able to get away with a reseller to reseller transfer with OpenSRS if it's expired, but I don't remember for sure).

    Good luck!

    1. Re:Jumpdomain has fallen off the face of the earth by Tripster · · Score: 1

      Tucows are usually pretty good at dealing with non-responsive resellers and they will help you find a responsive reseller to transfer the domain to. At the very least they will help you maintain ownership of a domain.

    2. Re:Jumpdomain has fallen off the face of the earth by silas_moeckel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have to second this one, I work for a fairly large (top 30 ish) registrar that used ot go through tucows if your having an issue and JD is not responsive get tucows to step in. Elliot and crew generaly do a good job.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re:Jumpdomain has fallen off the face of the earth by wayne · · Score: 1
      1) The admin email address is setup to be an auto@domains.jumpdomain.com (or something similar) which doesn't end up being delivered to the actual admin of the domain. This causes all of the automated transfer emails to not get delivered. You can update this information through OpenSRS at www.adminchange.com. I haven't needed to do this with eNom, but I'm guessing they have a similar process.

      Yes, I had the very same problem with jumpdomain and tucows. Jumpdomain changed my admin contact with out notifying me and without my permission. I tried using their adminchange website, which says that you can get the admin contact for my domain changed back, but they require you to print out a form, and then scan it back in, and then email it. Unfortunately, the email address is just a bot that consistently says that you didn't give any attachments, even when you did!

      I was eventually able to email "Paul Karkas" <pkarkas@tucows.com> with the attachments, and then just last week, my .com domain's admin contact was fixed. Any day now, GoDaddy will have control of all of my domains.

      --
      SPF support for most open source mail servers can be found at libspf2.
  27. Find a Lawyer by Rolan · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but it sounds like you have a fraud case at the least (paid for the service, but not received). If they're business domains you may be able to collect damages due to their negligence. If you can't afford a lawyer, just threaten one. Frequently a lawsuit will get a company's attention real quick. If they've done it to a number of people (likely), they should realize it could easily turn into a class action. It's a good way to be put into bankruptcy/liquidation by the court, given they probably don't have much, if anything, that's worth anything.

    At the same time, you can dig through ICANN's website and see if they have any procedures for this sort of thing. Don't hold your breath.

    --
    - AMW
    1. Re:Find a Lawyer by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 1

      While this tactic might work in most areas it is definately will not do much here.

      Aside from the fact that the lawyer will cost one thousand times more than the price of the domain if the place is just a reseller and is no longer in business then you are not going to get squat for cash even if you win. (Plus a lawsuit will take 6 months to even get to the point where you could do something.) And I know of no class action lawyer who would even be interested in something so small--they want large liquid corporations or it is a waste of their time.

      Your best bet is to wait and redeem after the no-pick phase if it is a domain of a personal nature. If it is for business then go to another domain registrar and have them fight for you.

      --
      Quality Hosting e3 Servers
  28. Re:What I'd do by techfury90 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Problem:
    Domain Name: JUMPDOMAIN.COM
    Registrar: TUCOWS INC.
    Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net
    Referral URL: http://domainhelp.tucows.com
    Name Server: NS.JUMPSERVER.NET
    Name Server: NS2.JUMPSERVER.NET
    Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
    Updated Date: 28-dec-2004
    Creation Date: 23-jan-2000
    Expiration Date: 23-jan-2006
    --
    I'm friends with the youngest daughter of the former head of the PowerPC division of IBM you insensitive clod!
  29. A similar problem by sharkb8 · · Score: 1

    I just started as web master for my law school's website, and we're having a similar problem.

    We can't get any help from our hosting provider, so I figured I'd go somewhere else. (The former webmaster was using frontpage to post stuff and doesn't have a valid control panel login. We're looking at adding some PHP and a bulletin/discussion board. I don't think we've been billed for hosting for a couple of months)

    The problem is a couple of uears ago, someone registered the domain for 5 years. The person who registered it is long gone, and I can't get ahold of them to change the DNS entries.

    I've thought of transferring the domain registration also, does anyone have any suggestions about how well this would work?

    1. Re:A similar problem by xilet · · Score: 1

      Often if you fax/send a signed letter from someone in charge of IT or someone high up in the food chain for the orginization the domain is for, and you can prove you are with them, they will allow you to change it. I had to do this with a domain that I forgot to update the information for, and had moved and changed emails.

    2. Re:A similar problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The former webmaster was using frontpage to post stuff and doesn't have a valid control panel login ... The problem is a couple of uears ago, someone registered the domain for 5 years. The person who registered it is long gone, and I can't get ahold of them to change the DNS entries.

      Sounds like a class act organization! What's your number in case I get rear-ended?

      Transferring the domain should be as easy as initiating a transfer with another registrar (which will usually give tack a year on the existing expiration), assuming you have access to the admin contact in the WHOIS (If not, you'll probably have to contact the current registrar to get it changed to something valid). However, if you're currently hosting your DNS with said provider, you'll also have to transfer your DNS records (probably manually) to the new registrar or to different nameservers. Transerring to a different host should be as easy as signing up and pointing your DNS to their servers, asuming you still have control of your DNS and that hasn't been lost in the shuffle also.

      If you want to simplify it all, you might consider transferring everything to a registrar that provides domain registration, DNS hosting, and web hosting (make sure they have PHP and your other requirements). Then you have one contact for support (make sure it's a reputable one though).

      Ask for domains, DNS hosting, and web hosting in one package. Look/ask around to make sure they're not some fly-by-night POS. eNom offers domain registration, DNS hosting, and web hosting under one roof, and they've been around forever.

  30. Used to? by ninji · · Score: 1

    What do you mean USED to?
    netsol is still the worst.

    1. Re:Used to? by leonmergen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What do you mean USED to?
      netsol is still the worst.

      I think that at the point you cannot actually administer your domains, you've just made yourself familliar with a domain registar that's worse than netsol...

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    2. Re:Used to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, there is worst

      in my country (Portugal) the governement controled registrer for the national tld will only accept you if you have some kind of registred activity, and even in that case you can never have full control of your domain and you cant possibly imagine the amount of paperwork needed

      local gtld registrers will register their name, not yours (at least some of them) and, of course, will not give full control

      here DNS really sucks

  31. Honestly -- by gru3hunt3r · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have a lawyer write them a letter, send it certified.

    Explain in the letter that they either need to respond to you in writing how to transfer your domain name or you will be taking them to small claims court for the amount of the domain, along with the value of your time ($100/hr). Explain you would like to solve this amicably.
    If they respond - you win!

    If they don't, then take the letter to a judge and get a judgement against them.
    If they show up - you win!

    If they don't, You also win!
    File the appropriate paperwork to the court and let them know you intend to place a lean on the companies assets.

    Now, write Tucows/e-Nom a letter explaining that you have a court order to liquidate their assets.
    Ask if the account is in good standing and if it has any values (your attorney will be able to put this into legalease for you) .. tell them you intend to sell their reseller account. At the very minimum this will get the attention of somebody at those respective registrars.

    If it doesn't -- hire a company to seize and sell their reseller account and liquidate their assets, then you buy it on eBay! Whoohoo! Now you get your domain back and you've got your own registrar. Hurray!

    ps> if all this seems like too much work, then try finding another tucows reseller who can contact somebody at tucows to get the domain transferred to them. Tucows sucks, but they suck less if you're a reseller.

    1. Re:Honestly -- by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

      While this looks good in theory, it isn't.

      First, a draft of a letter from an attorney will cost $100 minimum. Want to spend $100 chasing $10?

      Then if they are like most people they will ignore the letter as it really means "nothing" in the business world. (I should know because as a former attorney I used to draft these all the time).

      Just taking the letter to a judge will not do anything. You will have to file a lawsuit in at least small claims court (here that is about another $100; now down $200 for $10).

      And if they show up most likely it will an attorney representing them, not a person who could do anything for you. The attorney will just be there to fight you.

      And if they don't show up you will get a judgment. Big whip; it doesn't mean they have to pay. If they don't have assets in the state you are in they you need to file the judgment in their state (more cash to do this).

      Then so what? They have a judgment against them; do you know how many people and companies have judgments against them and don't pay and you still can't get the cash? Lots. And this assumes you did everything correctly and did not miss a step AND that the court in the other state accepts the judgment without review (they are supposed to but if the defendant makes an argument that there wasn't due process they could reject the judgment and force you to litigate there). (Another $100 for filing fees, plus plane ticket, plus expenses).

      As for the forced liquidation that doesn't happen. And even if you could do this you are not going to do it without an attorney who is going to charge $150 per hour which will take about $10,000 in fees, usually around $1000 upfront non-refundable.

      Of course all of this assumes they even have any cash to begin with. If they are a corporation and the corporation has no cash left in it (or any assets) then you have your judgment and you are out how much?

      $100 lawyer letter
      $100 filing fee
      $100 filing fee, second state
      $200 plane ticket to litigate in second state
      $1000 non-refundable retainer new lawyer

      At a minimum $1500 cash out for a domain...

      Look, while hiring an attorney seems to be a good idea for small amounts it isn't. When I was a practicing attorney if someone had a case which dealt with an amount less than $10,000 it usually wasn't worth it for them to hire an attorney at all. They needed to go to small claims court and if the amount was really small suck it up and move on. You can spend a lot of money chasing principle but you have to weigh that against what your time is worth. If it is worth more then drop it.

      Oh, did I mention that at any time you have a judgment in small claims court you can invalidate it and retry the case again in the state I am in? That means after $1500 the defendant can make you start all over again.

      --
      Quality Hosting e3 Servers
    2. Re:Honestly -- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or you will be taking them to small claims court for the amount of the domain, along with the value of your time ($100/hr).

      Except that "lost wages" is not a compensible expense.
      I watch a lot of people's court.
      TiVo is freakin' awesome

    3. Re:Honestly -- by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 1

      True, you will only get back what you actuall lost (Actual Damages). In this case it would be the cost of the domain for one year.

      You could make an argument for implied damages based upon the loss of the domain if you had a business but you would have to show that there was some negligence or contractual arrangement between you and the registrar which allow for these damages (I'm guessing there isn't and there was terms which disclaimed any fitness of use warrant; that is, you are only out the cost of the domain).

      --
      Quality Hosting e3 Servers
    4. Re:Honestly -- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And if they show up most likely it will an attorney representing them

      I'd say that is pretty likely:

      http://www.jumpdomain.com/about.html
      Ownership:
      The ownership of Jump Domain still vests in it's founder. He is active in the day-to-day operations handling most communications with customers. He holds a Bachelors Degree and a Jurist Doctor (Law) Degree.

  32. Unfortunately its time to get a lawyer involved by mattkime · · Score: 1

    This isn't the wild wild internet anymore. Domain names are highly regulated legal holdings. When things turn sour you have few choices aside from getting lawyers involved. If you have _any_ problems with your domain names and can't afford a lawyer, then you can't afford the domain.

    Its the american way.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  33. Tried their whois contact number? by wpc4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Administrative Contact:
    Domain, Jump hostmaster@jumpdomain.com
    790 W 40 HWY #197
    Blue Springs, MO 64015
    US
    831-305-6918 Fax: 831-305-6918

    Or maybe hire some thugs and have them pay a visit?

    1. Re:Tried their whois contact number? by genkael · · Score: 1

      And in MO you can hire some of them mountain folk real cheap I hear.

      --
      GeneralKael -- Slacker Extraordinaire
    2. Re:Tried their whois contact number? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      According to some other post, that's a P.O. Box. Who do you suggest the thugs attack? The (presumably better armed) postal workers?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Tried their whois contact number? by wpc4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hide and wait until someone comes and picks up the mail, then follow them back to their HQ. Then have the thugs/mountain men attack.

    4. Re:Tried their whois contact number? by Lost_In_Specs · · Score: 1

      I live near there, though I'll never go back to Blue Springs (a 2 mph traffic accident that did no damage led to driving school, a six month suspended jail sentence, a year's probation, $250 fine - and I had a clean driving record before that). I'm not volunteering to be a thug, but I don't think that number is correct. I believe Blue Spring's area code is 816.

    5. Re:Tried their whois contact number? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, Santa Cruz and Monterey (south of Silicon Valley) are area code 831.

    6. Re:Tried their whois contact number? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      An npa/nxx lookup will show where that phone number leads, and it leads to Salinas, California, a city south about 40 miles south of San Jose, which is probably where you should start looking for these folks. Not in Missouri.

    7. Re:Tried their whois contact number? by bani · · Score: 1

      They are doing business through a PO box. Under federal law the postmaster for that location is obligated to give you the physical address and name of the individual who holds that box, on request.

    8. Re:Tried their whois contact number? by Yakko · · Score: 1

      That phone info looks really fishy. Last I heard, Blue Springs was still in the 816 area. Why would they have a brick&mortar presence in MO, yet have a CA phone number? Maybe they're using VOIP...

      Sounds more like "Jump-through-hoops Domain" on the surface. :o)

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    9. Re:Tried their whois contact number? by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      It's not a PO box. It could be a Mailboxes Etc. type of business though.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
  34. LIBEL by EvanED · · Score: 1

    Liable for what?

    You know, if you're gonna correct someone, be sure to get it right. (Like me; right now I'm going to Google "libel" to be 100% positive I spelled it right.)

    1. Re:LIBEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And if you are going to bother correcting someone, at least get it right. Injurious Falsehood. You can't slander/libel a non-human entity.

    2. Re:LIBEL by Anarke_Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Corporations are considered the closest equivelent and are considered "persons" under the law. You CAN be brought under suit for libelous statements by a corporation in defense of their good name (should they have one to defend).

    3. Re:LIBEL by tengu1sd · · Score: 1

      IANAL but isnt' issn't an honest Label defense for Libel?

  35. The answer to problems such as these? by CarnivoreMan · · Score: 1, Funny

    Go TP their HQ, and drain the oil from their cars.

  36. Parent Co.? by Valiss · · Score: 1, Informative

    I would contact the parent company. In this case it's TUCOWS, at least according to NetSol (unless I am mis-reading this):

    Domain Name: JUMPDOMAIN.COM
    Registrar: TUCOWS INC.
    Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net
    Referral URL: http://domainhelp.tucows.com
    Name Server: NS.JUMPSERVER.NET
    Name Server: NS2.JUMPSERVER.NET
    Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
    Updated Date: 28-dec-2004
    Creation Date: 23-jan-2000
    Expiration Date: 23-jan-2006

    TUCOWS has a help page here: http://domainhelp.tucows.com/

    Or call them:

    Headquarters
    Tucows Inc.
    96 Mowat Avenue
    Toronto, ON
    Canada M6K 3M1
    Phone: 1-416-535-0123
    Fax: 1-416-531-5584

    Reseller Support Center
    Monday to Friday 8am - 8pm (EST)
    North America:
    1-800-371-6992
    International:
    + 800-371-69922

    --

    -Valiss
    1. Re:Parent Co.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that means is that the domain 'jumpdomain.com' was registered through tucows. It does not mean that tucows is in any way affiliated with the actual company jumpdomain - just that they are where their domain was initially registered.

    2. Re:Parent Co.? by buddhahat · · Score: 1

      You are misreading it. Tucows is the registrar for the domain jumpdomain.com, not the owner.

      --
      ------ How can making people laugh lead to bad karma?
    3. Re:Parent Co.? by Valiss · · Score: 1

      Ah, well I have never had to deal with this exact problem to be sure. But my general tactics involve attmepting to get in touch with whoever owns them. I have found that many companies have parent companies that can crack the whip, o to speak, on the smaller one to comply.

      In either case, this might be an effective strategy - if you can find a phone number to talk to someone. Many companies in my experience try their best to hide their customer service phone numbers (Amazon.com anyone - though I have found one).

      Hope that is some help!

      --

      -Valiss
  37. That's weird by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Register.com will keep a domain for 70 days after it expires in case the owner wants to reclaim it.

    Have you tried reporting them to the Better Business Bureau?

    1. Re:That's weird by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      What exactly is this supposed to accomplish? The only thing it will do is let anyone who contacts the BBB BEFORE choosing a registrar that there has been a complaint against them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:That's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In theory, I presume. Unless you ask about why a domain has been on administrative hold for three years after it was supposed to expire. Then they will continue to sit on it forever and only refer inquiries to the sales department...

  38. Re:The Three Point Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    libel, not liable.

  39. Re:The Three Point Plan by yiantsbro · · Score: 5, Funny

    "In print it's liable..." ...uh, yeah....liable to be considered libel.

  40. This is the correct answer by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would hope that Icann would jump in and help out even if he is a little guy. I mean that's what they exist for right?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:This is the correct answer by hepwori · · Score: 5, Informative

      I would hope that Icann would jump in and help out even if he is a little guy. I mean that's what they exist for right?

      No, it's not. From the linked page, "ICANN does not resolve individual customer complaints".

    2. Re:This is the correct answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

    3. Re:This is the correct answer by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 1

      It's still the right answer. The guy just needs more people to file complaints that have the same problem.

      --
      The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  41. Re:The Three Point Plan by Yolegoman · · Score: 1

    6) ?????

    7) PROFIT!!!

  42. Re:The Three Point Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    libel is still away to defimate (yeah, I made that up, but it rhymes with deficate, uh huh huh huh) someone

    That being said, if the actions happened as submitter said they did, it's neither.

  43. Domains in Canada by Kimos · · Score: 1

    I use internic.ca and I've never had a problem...

    1. Re:Domains in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      These guys send out fake invoices to people on other registrars which are really nothing more than a "renew and transfer" form. With business practices like that, I don't deal with them. I keep getting their fake invoices for many different domains I own.

    2. Re:Domains in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're thinking of Domain Registry of Canada , which is actually namejuice.com, which is actually Brandon Gray Internet Services. It's DROC that sends out all the phony notices - as a registrar, I field customer calls about them constantly. Internic.ca is (afaik) on the up-and-up, although their prices are awfully high.

    3. Re:Domains in Canada by taylortbb · · Score: 1

      I too have used Internic and have never had any problems. No forced renewal, easy transfers, everything, but, they have rediculos prices. It costs 3-5 times as much as a place like GoDaddy.

      Generally for domains I buy them with my hosting (I have very few domains not tied to a hosting package). Its just easier because they take care of everything and making sure its working together, and I only have to deal with 1 company. Right now thats WestHost, can't beat 24/7 toll-free phone support (with less than 30 seconds on hold).

    4. Re:Domains in Canada by Kimos · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I get fake letters from the Domain Registry of Canada every year. Those letters are what remind me it's time to renew with Internic!

  44. Better Business Bureau by Captoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The BBB says that Jump Domain has an unsatisfactory record due to unanswered complaints. It lists the contact information as follows:

    Jump Domain
    740 W 40 Hwy Ste 197
    Blue Springs, MO 64015
    Telephone: (816) 550-2376
    Fax: (816) 550-2376

    If any readers live near Blue Springs, perhaps they would be kind enough to go knock on Jump Domain's door and see if anybody's there.

    1. Re:Better Business Bureau by Rolan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better try the "Office Address" (which is listed as not open to the public) than the masked PO box.

      Jump Domain, LLC
      1700 W 40 HWY
      Blue Springs, MO 64015

      Amusingly enough, from their site:
      "The ownership of Jump Domain still vests in it's founder. He is active in the day-to-day operations handling most communications with customers. He holds a Bachelors Degree and a Jurist Doctor (Law) Degree." (Bolding mine.)

      You'd think he'd realize this kind of stuff can get him sued.

      --
      - AMW
    2. Re:Better Business Bureau by Captoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      GoDaddy.com has been mentioned several times in other posts. I have used them myself and I am quite pleased. I looked up Go Daddy with the BBB and they have a satisfactory record. Also, Go Daddy has been a BBB member for the last five years. (Jump Domain is not a BBB member.)

    3. Re:Better Business Bureau by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      I had an absolutely awfultime with GoDaddy last time I tried to get anything done. Still, I remain with them, because I have taken steps to prevent what happened last time from happening again.

      Two strikes and they are out.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    4. Re:Better Business Bureau by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      I switched from Register.com to GoDaddy and have not had any problems with the service provided by GoDaddy, FWIW. And I've saved a few dollars.

      Based on my own experience and things I've heard from respected colleagues, I consider GoDaddy to be a pretty good choice for domain registration.

      But then again, my opinion and $2.00 will get you a cup of coffee. <shrug>

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
    5. Re:Better Business Bureau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, lookie here!
      http://maps.google.com/maps?q=740+W+40+Hwy+Ste+197 ,Blue+Springs,+MO+64015&ll=39.132813,-94.495004&sp n=0.917969,0.992225&hl=en

      James B. Nutter looks to be the proprietor of the location.. and he does realty?

    6. Re:Better Business Bureau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait.. nevermind.. that's kinda strange.. I know a service can't be perfect, but the entire wrong city is kinda a big jump.

    7. Re:Better Business Bureau by gelos · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's always weird when you see news that's near you. That address is just down the street from where my parents live. It looks like it's a ceratin block of non-descript office buildings if I remember correctly. There are no houses on that section of 40 highway in Blue Springs. I'll have to drive by there the next time I visit my parents.

    8. Re:Better Business Bureau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further contact info from someone named "Scott" claiming to represent Jump Domain:

      JumpDomain
      Hello,

      If you are having problems, you can always give us a call on the telephone if you need assistance: 816-448-9636 Our telephone support is available 7 days a week.

      Scott

      Jump Domain

    9. Re:Better Business Bureau by robpoe · · Score: 1

      From whitepages.com

      Jump Domain LLC
      1600 W 40 Highway
      Blue Springs, MO 64015
      (816) 228-1998

      --
      = Grow a brain...
  45. My vote by schon · · Score: 1

    www.reg.ca

    Great service, good prices. They go the extra mile, and have real, live people answering questions.

    Funniest story was after I'd transfered a domain to them; I got an email from one of their techs asking about my DNS servers (which are named Lister, Kryten, and Rimmer) - he was apparently a big Red Dwarf Fan.

  46. WazooWeb by Patman · · Score: 1

    I'm having the exact same problem with Wazooweb, but I can't even figure out who the 'upstream' is. I thought it was hosting4u.com, but I can't contact them either. Anyone have any help?

    1. Re:WazooWeb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the parent registrar? Did you try doing a WHOIS? THe domain is registered with TUCOWS.

  47. Re:The Three Point Plan by me+at+werk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not if you have Leonard "J." Crabs on your side!

    --
    For context, click Parent.
  48. I think you mean... by waynegoode · · Score: 1

    I think you mean namecheap.com. I also use them with no complaints.

    1. Re:I think you mean... by Armadni+General · · Score: 0, Informative

      Please do note that when typing a URL for a file on an external domain, you must include HTTP:// or else the browser interprets it as being on the same domain. K.

  49. Had much worse happening. by blang · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to have my domain registered with a discount gig (think it was domainshop.com), that was later bought up by those crooks at Verisign.

    That started a short but very unpleasant relationship. I would receive countless amounts of spam, and when it was time to renew, the price had gone up A LOT, and it would cost me A LOT also to have the service tranferred to a competing service. I wonder hwo many of those customers stayed on with Verisign. Couldn't have been many.

    I chose instead to let my domain expire, and again Verisign was messing with me. It took much longer than the advertized amout of time for the domain name to be released, so I had to try and fail many times before I eventually could reclaim my domain.

    The moral is:
    If you find a cheap registrar, make sure you've subscribed for a long period. Even if they'd go belly up after the first year, you're probably better off than signing with Verisign. And if they get bought by Verisign, the renewal is not going to gobble your whole nestegg. And who knows, after 5 years, maybe even Verisign will have adjusted their prices to compete.

    Since I went with godaddy.com several years ago, I've not received a single spam mail, and they've been easy to deal with, and they even have a neat mail forwarding service.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  50. What did he expect...... by whoever57 · · Score: 0

    from a registrar with a huge flash header on their home page?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  51. Damage Control by terrygao · · Score: 1

    Unless you have some extremely popular or short domain names, I would imagine you might be able to register it again when it expired. At least it is a good damage control while you are still in contact with your service provider.

  52. Re:The Three Point Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The 'J.' Stands For 'Great Value!!!! '"

  53. Extortion? by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 4, Funny
    As a Valentine's day gift I bought my now-ex girlfriend her name dot com and threw up a little vanity site for her. Anyway, now that we're not together, she wants me to transfer the domain to her. I'm not sure why, but I refused, and she said that if I don't give it to her, even though (I think) I am safely the legal owner of the domain despite its being her first and last name, she'd "sick my dad's lawyers on you anyway."

    I've heard about more than one incident of people handing over a domain at the threat of litigation even when they know they're in the right simply because it would be necessary to hire lawyers either way and a cost-benefit analysis yields that they should just bend over and give up. The 2600 guys have had plenty of experience down this path. Have there been cases where people have counter-sued for being, I don't know the word -- extored, blackmailed, whatever -- in a situation where someone with a lot of cash muscles the other side into folding simply because they know the other side has neither the money nor, in other cases, the political capital to defend themselves?

    Parenthetically, I like the UK's system in which the plaintiff has to pay the defendant's legal bills if the suit loses. We should do that.

    1. Re:Extortion? by El · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you gave her the domain as a gift, then you should turn it over to her, regardless of how much she has pissed you off. Or do you normally make a practice of giving people gifts, then taking them back?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:Extortion? by russotto · · Score: 1

      If it was a gift she'd likely win the lawsuit.

    3. Re:Extortion? by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1

      The website was the gift actually. And to be more specific it was toward the end of the relationship when things were getting rocky and she was worried I'd use it to put up nasty stuff about her, and her not trusting me was what made me retaliate by not acquiescing. In my defense, I told her no matter what happened I'd maintain the site and make any changes she wanted or had someone else do and then upload it myself, a gesture of good faith, and she immediately brought up lawyers.

    4. Re:Extortion? by dulles · · Score: 1

      Do you really want to be paying the defendant's legal bill if you lose a case where you, the little guy, are suing a large corporation?

    5. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why the fuck would you want to keep it? just give it to her... it was a gift

    6. Re:Extortion? by Cobblepop · · Score: 4, Funny

      You made her a site for Valentine's day? No wonder she's an ex...

    7. Re:Extortion? by jcuffe · · Score: 1

      That's why you should never buy something like that in someone else's name, especially becuase she would never have known anyway. If you ever end up doing that again, register it in your name.

    8. Re:Extortion? by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1

      I did register it in my name. I paid for it, it's my name and address on the whois, and regardless of the domain itself, I own the sucker (or so I think).

    9. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In my defense, I told her no matter what happened I'd maintain the site and make any changes she wanted or had someone else do and then upload it myself, a gesture of good faith, and she immediately brought up lawyers.

      That sounds like you are looking for excuses for her to depend on you for stuff.

      Whether it technically or legally belongs to you is beside the point. You were being unreasonable to hold onto it. Just give it to her.

    10. Re:Extortion? by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll have to run that by my psychoanalyst, but my guess is I'm keeping it because I'm an asshole.

    11. Re:Extortion? by cdsr · · Score: 1

      According to Judge Judy she owns it.

      You "gave her a gift." You basically said, "here, I transfer ownership of this entity to you!"

      It was nice of you to provide her the service of building and maintaining the site while you were together but look at what you said: "As a Valentine's day gift I bought my now-ex girlfriend her name dot com"

      Change 'her name dot com' to say, 'some earrings' and wouldn't you expect her to keep them after the break-up? I've seen maybe 10 episodes of Judge Judy and this happens in about nine of them. I think daddy's lawyers would rip you up.

      I say give it back but every time you think of her just remember the ONE GOD DAMN time you got to fuck her in the ass or something. It'll make you feel better.

    12. Re:Extortion? by Shalda · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dude, you're a jackass. Just give her the damn domain and get on with your life. If it was a gift, which you admit, then you're just the technical administrator and she's in the right. As to your broader point, that's what courts and arbitrators (and apparently /.) exist for. Threatening to take someone to court is not extortion. It's presumed (whether true or not) that the courts will fairly and correctly determine who is right and wrong and issue a judgement accordingly. It's also common in the US for the courts to award legal fees in cases that are frivilous and without merit, as well as cases where someone has acted with malice and disregard for the law. Now, go back to your ex, appologize for being a jerk and do the right thing.

    13. Re:Extortion? by harl · · Score: 1

      Names are not copyrightable or trademarkable. She has no legal claim to the domain.

      However that in no way prevents her from sueing you and making it very very expensive to keep the domain.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    14. Re:Extortion? by RealSalmon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a Valentine's day gift I bought my now-ex girlfriend her name dot com and threw up a little vanity site for her. Anyway, now that we're not together, she wants me to transfer the domain to her. I'm not sure why, but I refused, and she said that if I don't give it to her, even though (I think) I am safely the legal owner of the domain despite its being her first and last name, she'd "sick my dad's lawyers on you anyway."

      Except that by your own admission you gave her the domain as a gift, which is probably going to hurt your legal standing in the manner. Not to mention that it sounds kind of petty. If you gave it to her as a gift, just transfer it to her and move on with your life.

      --

      -B

    15. Re:Extortion? by jcuffe · · Score: 1

      > I am safely the legal owner of the domain despite its being her first and last name

      Sorry, I thought that meant that you had registered it with her first and last name, not that it was firstlast.com. In that case, you own the sucker. If she brings it up in court saying it was a gift, just ask why it doesn't have her name on the whois in that case. Also, hearsay isn't acceptable in a court of law.

      If you're concerned about the fact that it's her name, read up on the guy who bought bosleymedical.com

    16. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was her I'd (1) sue the fuck out of you (2) have you beaten up just for laughs and (3) set my wolf on you, not necessarily in that order.

    17. Re:Extortion? by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Funny

      are you sure you wouldn't just beat your chest on the internet untill mom made you do your homework and go to bed?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    18. Re:Extortion? by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Funny

      give the domain back to her, but only after transferring the registrar to Jump domain *BFEG*

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    19. Re:Extortion? by jcuffe · · Score: 1

      The difference is, in those situations it's something that you actually _gave_ to the person: "Here are some earrings." It's the same as having your girlfriend move in with you. You own the house, and if things go south, she sure as hell can't have it. Anything registered in his name isn't really a gift, he's just letting her use it.

    20. Re:Extortion? by Peristarkawan · · Score: 1

      Judge Judy isn't exactly the best place to look for legal precedents. The only thing legally binding about her decisions is the contract they sign with both parties before-hand which says they'll settle their disagreement on the show rather than in a real court, and that they'll abide by the decision. The decisions themselves are largely driven by ratings, i.e. by what the masses of laypersons on their armchairs will agree is a good decision, and not by force of law.

    21. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really know what I'm talking about (obviously) but I don't think your analogy is apt at all. It would be more like saying "you can move in with me and the house is a gift to you baby, but while we are together I will keep it clean and fix the leaky faucet."

      As far as I know a domain is legally no different from a physical object, I'm sure people will soon be leaving domains in their wills for example. Is there any good reason why can't you give someone a domain like you could earrings?

      And he didn't say he was "just letting her use it," he said he "gave" it to her as a gift.

    22. Re:Extortion? by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 1
      You "gave her a gift."

      This is more like writing a poem for someone. You can write a poem in someone's honor as a gift, but you don't transfer the copyrights to them. Sounds like the site was a fansite, not a site for her to use (as in, "Here, I created an e-commerce site for your business").

    23. Re:Extortion? by Solandri · · Score: 1
      Do you really want to be paying the defendant's legal bill if you lose a case where you, the little guy, are suing a large corporation?

      That's a scare tactic the trial lawyer lobby uses to keep the public opposed to a loser pays system. In countries where the loser does pay, the judge has authority to use his/her jdugement to determine how much the loser should pay. If you sue a corporation that decides to hire $1000/hr lawyers to fight you, and you lose, the judge decides how much you pay. If he decides the corporation overspent on legal fees, he can cap your payment to what he feels is a reasonable amount. If he decides your case had merit even though you lost, you might not even have to pay anything. Of course if he decides your lawsuit was frivilous he may make you pay the full amount, which is the whole point - an impartial third party has the final say on whether a lawsuit is worthwhile, not some lawyer who only risks losing time.

    24. Re:Extortion? by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 1
      No matter how nasty she might have been about it...

      No matter what your legal rights may be...

      There is one simple guiding principle that applies here: The woman is always right.

      Accept that, and the resolution is clear: You can't win. Give her whatever she wants.

    25. Re:Extortion? by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      Parenthetically, I like the UK's system in which the plaintiff has to pay the defendant's legal bills if the suit loses. We should do that.


      I agree. That way, assholes like you that keep things that don't belong do you don't cause their victims to additionally pay legal fees.

    26. Re:Extortion? by cdsr · · Score: 1

      WHAT!!! REALLY?? :)

      Seriously though, I'm curious why you think she doesn't follow the law? Is she not still bound by the rules of the Bar Assoc? I would think she would be disbarred for passing judgements that violate the law. Not to mention that would be very wrong ethically, especially for a person who is held up by society as having strong ethics (as all judges are, that's why they're judges).

      Can you impersonate a judge in the US? I know you can't call yourself an engineer or a doctor here in Canada unless you are one, I assume the same would go for judges.

      Not to mention the fact that all these TV judges say things like "this is the law: ... " or "that's nice but the law is this ... " or "if this happens again the law says you can do this ... "

    27. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really think she wants the artistic work he did for the web site back (fansite, e-commerce, whatever, it's all the same). She wants the domain.

      It would be like writing a poem for someone on a piece of paper, giving the paper as a gift, then demanding the paper back afterwards. The paper is hers, if there's copyrited material on the paper then he can retain all rights to it, that's not the issue.

    28. Re:Extortion? by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1
      ... at which point she should be welcome to the source code. The website was the gift, the domain name is just a convenient way to find it. I can take a phone from my house and give it as a gift, too... but I get to keep the phone number.

      Of course, since all of the code that was at that domain has gone bye-bye, gotta replace it with something, and at that point the grandparent's gonna be pissed off enough to think of all sorts of other things to go in it's place ;)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    29. Re:Extortion? by cdsr · · Score: 1

      I think you've got it a little wrong. Women are always right when they're letting you have sex with them. Otherwise... mostly wrong.

    30. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't see where the grandparent poster claimed he GAVE her the website. HE registered a domain name, and created a work of art in TRIBUTE.

      Geez. Guys like you also say "get on with your life" when people claim about their privacy being violated. I hate it when people roll over so easily, as an example.

      Since you don't know their story, you shouldn't comment on the personal aspects. Maybe she doesn't deserve the domain.

      If you write a poem for a girl, and later turn it into a song, is she entitled to royalties? I think everything you make is yours unless you explicitly transfer rights.

      The domain is property. If she did not acquire the login to administer the domain to begin with, then there was never a transfer of the property to her.

    31. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      right, and this where you show that you are not simply a jilted lover, but rather are an asshole. When you registered it, during the happy times, you were confronted by what name to stick in that field. That you chose your name and not hers indicates that you had prick-intent.

      Nah, don't give me any excuses, I've done this kind of thing for many people, SO's, rich, poor, famous, obscure, and otherwise, and every time I've realized that I could take advantage of the sitch, and I've always chosen the honorable path.

    32. Re:Extortion? by JockAMundo · · Score: 1

      I bought a domain name and made a little vanity site for my wife for Valentine's Day a couple of years ago, and we're still married!

      On the other hand, this is the woman who, after losing her wedding ring in the Atlantic, wanted me to buy her a set of living room furniture instead of replacing the ring. Not the most romantic woman in the world, but then again, I'm not a romantic man (which I suppose is the /. way), so it all works out.

    33. Re:Extortion? by Vip · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. He did give it to her, he even says so. It was a "Valentine's Day gift"

      Once you give a gift, it belongs to the person you gave it to. They can do whatever they want with it, you no longer have any say. You cannot give something with strings attached and call it a gift. If you attach conditions, then it is not a gift.

      Watch a loan argument in small claims if you're still not clear on this.

      In this case, he freely admits giving it to her as a gift, thus it's her domain, he should give it to her, and find himself a new girlfriend.

      Vip

    34. Re:Extortion? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with the parent. What you've done is kinda creepy, and very jerky.

    35. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! Get a life! Most guys can't even remember the name of most of their ex-es. Some even have problems remembering the name of their date while they are on the date! ;))

      Who in the world wants to keep the domain name of his ex???

      Unless you are so obsessed with her that you want to make it a 'hate' site, there is no point. But maybe that is the point, in which case I would book some more time with my therapist if I were you.

      In any other case, congratulation with your trolling. Seems to work :)

    36. Re:Extortion? by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 1
      Almost, but in your analogy he never gave her the piece of paper. He may have read the poem aloud, but he kept the piece of paper.

      There is nothing that says he ever gave the site to her in any way; it was registered in his name, and he kept the passwords and did the admin work.

      Sure she wants the domain. Most of us want a lot of things that we don't deserve (and are never going to get). If she had asked nicely for it, he would have given it to her. Instead, she tried to push him around, and he pushed back. What a surprise. She apparently has not figured out that it doesn't work as well to try to force guys to do what you want after you have dumped them.

    37. Re:Extortion? by Pootie+Tang · · Score: 1

      My suggestion is avoid dating chicks named Ass Ambassador. Probably could have avoided the whole mess if you had just paid attention to that red flag.

    38. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the domain is in his name, and he paid for it, then he did not buy *ownership* of the domain for her, despite what you might think. He is the owner. The *gift* he gave her was simply the presentation of the domain and web site before her. And if she's being snotty about it and threatening legal action, he should hold on to the domain and make her purchase it from him. Might as well make a buck of this one!

    39. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now we see why nerds have problems keeping girlfriends.

      As a girl who once got a gift of a domain by a now ex and kept it after breaking up, I say "Stop being a dick."

    40. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? The bitch dumped him, probably for some asshole who will beat the shit out of her. Just one more lump...

    41. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, if only I had some mod points. ROFL.

    42. Re:Extortion? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      If it's not already transferred into her name, he didn't really give the domain to her. The site might have been created for the girl, but if his name is on the bill, it's his.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    43. Re:Extortion? by ediron2 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Duh... just transfer your domain registration to Jump Domain (or google for negative reviews of incredibly-bad, incredibly-expensive registrars), then hand her the keys in return for a cashiers check for the transfer fee.

      I've got this Dell Inkjet 720 piece-of-shit whose refill cartridges are even MORE proprietary and spendy than Lexmark's (the printer's maker, uncoincidentally). Don't blame me, it came free with a cheap PC my mom bought. After weeks of plotting a way to kill it (catapult? Charcoal and liquid oxygen? Tommy Gun?... hmmm) I found a better resolution:

      I'm about to give to a frightful local charter school that is apparently run by Jackbooted-Thugs-R-Us. Enforced parade marches, no talking except at lunch or if asked a question, etc. Win-win: two evils get mutual antagonism and I get a clear conscience. Oh, and I even get a tax write-off!

    44. Re:Extortion? by khallow · · Score: 1
      The domain is property. If she did not acquire the login to administer the domain to begin with, then there was never a transfer of the property to her.

      Let's stop being retarded here. How much is that property worth to Mr. Ex-boyfriend? Zero. If it had substantial value or if she had welshed on a contract to pay a share of the costs, then that's one thing. But it doesn't appear to be the case here.

      Geez. Guys like you also say "get on with your life" when people claim about their privacy being violated. I hate it when people roll over so easily, as an example.

      Since you don't know their story, you shouldn't comment on the personal aspects. Maybe she doesn't deserve the domain.

      Who cares if she "deserves" the domain or not? There are no noble principles at stake. It's an ex-girlfriend not the Feds sifting through your email or recording every cell phone call ever made. He purchased her a Valentine's Day gift, apparently no strings attached, later she spurns him. I say, he should cut his losses, get on with his life, and yes, roll over easily in this matter.

    45. Re:Extortion? by corblix · · Score: 1
      As a Valentine's day gift I bought my now-ex girlfriend her name dot com and threw up

      Ah, the havoc that line-breaking algorithms can wreak!

    46. Re:Extortion? by spagetti_code · · Score: 1

      Its a gift. Ownership is therefore transferred to her. Just because you have control, doesn't mean you legally own it (otherwise.... can I borrow your car?

    47. Re:Extortion? by mikeswi · · Score: 1

      First, you're an ass for not handing it over. Second, a gift is the property of whoever you give it to. If she does sue you, 5 minutes after the judge sits down he's going to order you to transfer it, so you might as well do it now and save the hassle.

    48. Re:Extortion? by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 1

      Thanks ;), good eye. The traffic to my site has maxed out my dsl. This domain thing stopped being an issue in my life ten months ago, but it looked like good thread material to get the .sig noticed. If I were trying to find an answer to the actual legal question I would not have brought up girlfriends. The fish are hungry!

    49. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As a Valentine's day gift I bought my now-ex girlfriend her name dot com and threw up a little vanity site for her."

      Sounds like he gave it to her..

    50. Re:Extortion? by droleary · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. He did give it to her, he even says so. It was a "Valentine's Day gift"

      To be somewhat fair, it isn't entire clear what part was the "gift". It could be that he took it to mean the site creation/hosting. To be fair to her, though, it is easy for a non-geek to take the "gift" to be the domain and all related material. On the balance, I'd take her side along with you. It'd be like giving her a bowling ball (or whatever) with her name engraved on it, and then later claiming what you really intended as the "gift" was the use of the item. That stupid, post-breakup power grabbing is juvenile, and he made no case why he would otherwise keep the domain for his own (i.e., unrelated to her) purposes.

    51. Re:Extortion? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I agree with the people saying that you should turn it over regardless of whether you could be forced to.

      Keep in mind not only the present but what would happen if a future potential beau gets wind of the story and thinks you're vindictive.

    52. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as your going to be a jerk and re-nig on your gift, have you considered transfering the domain to jumpdomain beforing turning it over to her? I heard from someplace that they are "nice" to deal with and she might enjoy doing business with them when it comes time to renew the domain.

    53. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. a domain for a valentines day gift.

      That is the saddest thing i've ever heard.

      Even worse than the fact shes willing to sue you over a most likely useless site.

      You two deserve each other.

    54. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asshole? You give yourself too much credit, you sound like a pathetic, insecure loser to me.

    55. Re:Extortion? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      [laughing] No wonder it was slow even compared to my shitty dialup :) Nice job, tho. The few shots I looked at are seriously, um, classy. {Sending URL to a friend, who will waste far too much time admiring 'em all :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    56. Re:Extortion? by syousef · · Score: 1

      ...after losing her wedding ring in the Atlantic, wanted me to buy her a set of living room furniture instead of replacing the ring...

      Dude, romantic or not, whether you realize it or not, this probably means your marriage is in trouble. Even in modern times, that wedding ring represents you and your relationship to her, and she's happy to trade it in for living room furniture! Wake up!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    57. Re:Extortion? by QueenOfSwords · · Score: 1

      If you can't bring yourself to transfer it, just cancel the damn thing. Easy. If she wants it she can re-register it herself.

      --
      -- INTX Grouch. http://www.midnightblue.net
    58. Re:Extortion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to contradict everyone else here, who seem to think we live in a socialist paradise instead of America. . .American law feels very strongly about property and those little pieces of paper that establish its ownership. IF -- the big if -- the domain is registered in your name, it is legally your property, end of story.

      You may well have *said* you were giving it to her, *promised* you were doing so, even *acted* as if you did -- but unless it's actually registered to her, you didn't. You (and she) only maybe thought you did, poor sillies. She can't even bring suit for breach of contract, because she didn't give you anything in exchange -- there was no contract. And breach of promise hasn't been prosecuted in 45 years. . .

      Your ex-GF doesn't have the ghost of a case. A lawyer might be willing to send you a threatening letter if paid to do so, but so what? You politely tell him to go to hell and you'll see his absurd ass in Court. It's your property, and the only neutral document available to the Court in this case (the registration record) says so.

      But you better take that damn site down! She's not a public person, and you could be in big trouble if she ever takes the slightest offense to what you put there. She doesn't even need to give you a chance to take down what she doesn't like. She can burn you for whatever "damage" to her name and reputation she can dream up. Do not trust any promises from her about it. You two are no longer in a trusting relationship. Take it down.

      As for whether to give her the domain name, or let it lapse, do what your ethics and the situation demands. If she was a reasonable person, dump it or give it to her. If she's a complete evil bitch, what the hell, hold onto it if it pleases you and displeases her. You don't owe a damn thing to evil people. Yeah, even if they are women. (Shock! horror! a geek who does not grovel in front of the female! can ya stand it?)

  54. Repost of my response to poster at DNForum.com by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 4, Informative

    Repost of my two replies regarding this topic at DNForum.com:

    Firstly, you're dealing with a seemingly shady company ... Jump Domain postal address, even in their corporate filings, is a MailBoxes, Etc. maildrop - 790 W. 40 HWY #197, BLUE SPRINGS MO 64015.

    Worse, the agent name may be bogus (or perhaps is a partial name [ie. middle and last]) ... agent is listed as Scott Ison.

    https://www.sos.mo.gov/BusinessEntity/soskb/Corp .a sp?621690

    With that said, Jump Domain does not appear to be an accredited registrar - your domains are very likely actually registered with Tucows ... contact Tucows and explain you want to transfer them out - either to another registrar, or at minimum, to another Tucows reseller so that you can administer your domains - no matter what Tucows tells you, get your domains away from Jump Domain.

    Become a real pest, if that's what it takes, and *call* Tucows a lot - hopefully their customer support will help you the first time, but sometimes persistance is how these things get solved - try email, etc first, but if no adequate response ... use the phone and tie up their staff - that way Tucows is forced to deal with the problem as opposed to putting it off indefinitely.

    Tucows Inc.
    96 MOWAT AVENUE
    Toronto, Ontario M6K 3M1
    Canada
    416 535 0123
    support@opensrs.org

    ** Follow-up/addendum to my above reply **

    My bad on the registrar - I based my answer on searching I did on Jump Domain.

    Still, the approach should be the same, just that he'll need to deal with Enom ... or perhaps Tucows too, since some of his domains could be registered through other registrars - certainly a possibility given what I've learned so far about Jump Domain. ...

    One point I didn't make clear is even if Jump Domain is no longer affiliated with Tucows, that does NOT mean the domains they managed automatically moved from Tucows; they're still likely there - in a nutshell, the registrant will need to check the registrar of record for each domain at the links below: .com / .net registry
    http://registrar.verisign-grs.com/whois/ .org registry
    http://www.pir.org/

    Ron

    1. Re:Repost of my response to poster at DNForum.com by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

      Having a Mail Boxes Etc. PO Box doesn't really mean that a company is bad, in and of itself. For instance, to get a business license, you have to have a business address. In some states, they allow a "Virtual Office" that you can use as a mailing address. Typically, it means that there will be someone at that address 9-5 m-f.

      Some legitimate businesses are able to cut costs of overhead this way.

      --
      Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
  55. Re:The Three Point Plan by dJCL · · Score: 1

    Totally aside here... just was reading most of those today and yesterday... damn funny.

    "I don't like you, I'll sue!" is way too common.

    JC

    --
    On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
  56. About ..TK... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    This is a bit off on a tangent, but if anyone is having problems accessing the Tokelau domain registrar (http://dot.tk), try a new name server. There seems to be a problem with certain ISPs' DNS with regards to that site. It's not negligence, at least not on their part. :-)

    1. Re:About ..TK... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I had a possibly similar problem about a year ago -- when I used a for-really Earthlink POP, I could not reach my [redirected] domains, but when I used a leased POP, no problem.

      Between traceroute and helpful folks at GoDaddy, the problem was resolved -- seems one particular server at ELN was blocked due to being on some blackhole list. ELN got notified, server got fixed, I got a phone call from ELN and an email from GoDaddy both explaining the problem; everybody happy.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  57. Re:The Three Point Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    6) Profit!!!!!!!! Ouch!

  58. No one safe by davidag · · Score: 1

    namecheap.org is now for sale?
    Is no one safe from negligent registrars?


    Our new negligent overlords (which of course I welcome) must have made you misspell namecheap.com

  59. Registrars don't care about the customers by brontus3927 · · Score: 1

    I purchased a domain through 1&1 a year and a half ago. nj-space.net I had a burgoining site that seemed to be popular with bloggers looking for info about space policy. Unfortunately, I typed my credit card number in wrong or something and 1&1 were unable to get my payment. Instead of contacting me to resolve this issue, they deleted my account. I was told if I wanted to use the domain again, I would have to wait until it expired and register it again (preferably with their service). So for 6 months the New Jersey SPACE NETwork displayed a "this domain has been recently registered and the owner has not yet moved in" page. Then when it expired, somebody swooped in and stole it. It is now registered to "Company Require" in Buryatia, Russia with a hotmail address and +000.0000000 for telephone number.

    1. Re:Registrars don't care about the customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      hotmail address and +000.0000000 for telephone number.

      When I see fake contact info on a domain I want to smite, I usually report them to the parent registrar and ICANN. It's against the rules.

  60. Stick to a reputable registrar like... by george_sazo · · Score: 1

    Well I do not think you can do much about your lost domains. You can only learn a good lesson and stick with a reputable company. I use BulkRegister.com for the very beginning of the company and while their pricing is slightly higher, the company is extremely credible. IMHO, they will not refund anything no matter what you do. Do you know why? Because they are a scum and they do not care about their business, long term relationship with customers!

    1. Re:Stick to a reputable registrar like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the company you're trying to recommend would appreciate it if you'd work on your grammar a bit. You make it sound like BulkRegister is scummy.

    2. Re:Stick to a reputable registrar like... by merc · · Score: 1

      The name alone sounds spam-friendly (despite the disclaimer against spam on their website). A search on news.admin.net-abuse.email confirms that there are a lot of "spam support" complaints with this registrar.

      I'm not stating they are spam friendly, just reiterating what people have already said--that being you should do some preliminary diligence on a registrar, or really any company before engaging in any type of business transactions with them.

      Also, spam friendly companies have a habit of not staying in business very long (although eNom seems to be the exception to this rule).

      --
      It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
  61. One solution by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could see if they will let you register jumpdomainsucks.com; perhaps that will encourage them to fix the problem?

  62. Would move all to NetSol, but... by Superfreaker · · Score: 1

    I also have a few domains straggling around with not-so-great registrars. Despite some of the horrible things that NetSOl has done in the past, I still like them enough that I would transfer the other domains to them.

    However, the main reason why I don't is that when you initiate a domain transfer with NetSol, you can't specify the DNS server address before the domain transfers. That means that effectively the site will be offline when it does transfer over, instead of it beaing ready to go when it clears the old DNS caches.

  63. CSI: Mommy's Basement by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But which Who song shall be the theme?

    I would think "Pictures of Lily", since it's about young boys masturbating.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  64. There are many more... by skaag · · Score: 1

    It looks like while approved registrar are looking to enlarge their market share by providing APIs and fake front-ends to "resellers", they can not or will not take responsibility for their reseller's customers when said resellers go away or "die" misteriously. I had the same problem with dodora.net and with directi.com. It looked like dodora.net disappeared and was then sued or perhaps just went chapter 11, directi.com tried to take over but trashed many, MANY domains in the process (I lost almost 10 domains for customers due to their negligence). At some point a year later dodora.net came back like superman in the last moment, trying to save the day, but it was too little too late, and i've already managed to move most of my domains to namecheap.com which i'm very happy with! (overall BEST features i've seen with ANY registrar yet!)

    So my advice to you is to not get anywhere near either dodora.net or directi.com, don't say I didn't warn you. It is most unfortunate that some companies / people are just not stable and reliable enough to do business with.

    Skaag

    --

    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...

  65. Re:Jurist Doctor (Law) Degree by Captoo · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I think that's exactly why his name isn't mentioned anywhere at www.jumpdomain.com!

  66. Verisign sucks by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Verisign sucks. Working for ISPs back in the day, I was responsible for thousands of domain registrations and maint. Over the years, they have eaten all of my personal domains one by one, and sold them to spam/ad sites. When I call to have things fixed or transfered, I'm treated like an unknowing moron by some slang-speaking Joe-Bob.

    Fuck you, Verisign

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:Verisign sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In case you missed it, VeriSign sold Network Solutions October 16, 2003

      The funny part is the ROI on this deal: they bought NetSol in 2000 for $21 billion in stock, then sold it in 2003 for $100 million in stock and debt.

  67. Re:yea it happens. by qewl · · Score: 1

    Let me explain a little more. The massive paper forms were the worst. As soon as OpenSRS and the like came along, InterNIC's methods didn't even make sense. Nevertheless, they continued to charge $35/year. I remember trying to transfer a domain away from them which was immensly painful and purchasing humans.com from another person. The transfer took over half a year which is completely unacceptable. They would only let you make changes by paper forms or forms by e-mail, to which they would take months to even respond to, or never. To try to do anything over the phone with them took being on hold, patience and and all they would tell you was to refill and resend the forms. Then when they did respond to you, they would just tell you (barely legibally or understablly) that some minute detail was off, and you'd have to start all over again. And of course lets never forget the lawsuit brought agaisnt them for tying to hoard names and advertise on every unclaimed web-address. They were a horrible company to deal with and I would never do business with them again.

    --

    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
  68. Office address by Captoo · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the "Office Address" is the owner's house. That would explain why it's not open to the public.

    1. Re:Office address by gsaraber · · Score: 2, Informative

      Doesn't look like a house :) more like an office building..

      google maps has it

    2. Re:Office address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like a highway to me ;-)

    3. Re:Office address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not residential. If you look on Google Maps and hit the Satellite button, it looks industrial/commercial. Probably an office park or strip mall or something.

  69. Had a similar problem with Register.com by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    I decided to switch from Register.com because they were way more expensive then the competition out there now, by more then twice. $30/year? When I can get better service from DNSExit for $12?

    Anyways, I had about a month left on my domain so I started the transfer. Register.com sent me an e-mail saying that if I did *not* want to accept the transfer, to click this link. Otherwise, it would be.

    So I didn't click the link. The transfer was denied.

    I called them and they said they mistakenly sent out the wrong e-mail for a few days, and that I needed to transfer again. I only had 7 days left at this point, and it would have gone past it. They would NOT extend me any time at all, even though this was their own damned fault and they admitted it.

    So I had to hand over those jackasses another $30 just to get another week to get the transfer done. At least that additional year carries to my new registrar.

    DNSExit isn't perfect, but they've been better then Bulkregister, Register.com, and NSI.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  70. Small claims court by davids-world.com · · Score: 1

    Didn't check this registrar and don't know what country you're from, but in case you have a small claims court, I think this would be the way to go. Very often, companies would intervene before they have to send a representative to court. And you can do it without a lawyer and with minimal cost. Again, these things depend on your local situation.

  71. Canadian .ca domains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mark me OT, but my experience that was similar to this was with a .ca domain. After a few weeks of trying to contact the registrar (http://www.dot.ca/), I was able to contact CIRA directly, and they were able to assist me in getting the domain transferred (there's more to the story, but to summarize CIRA was very helpful (unlike ICANN)!).

  72. Re:yea it happens. by blew_fantom · · Score: 1, Interesting

    i guess i'm in the minority. i registered 3 domains thru netsol. even when they were internic back in the mid/late 90's, i had no problems registering, getting confirmations, getting updates, and when i had a problem, i somehow always ended up talking to a warm body (believe it or not, i even managed to get a password reset over the phone!). the process of consolidating my domains under one account (instead of three separate ones) was really simple too... but like i said, i seem to be in the minority. yes they are pricey, but they haven't let me down thru nearly 8 years of service!

  73. Re:What I'd do by Vermyndax · · Score: 1

    Seems like someone at JD is reading this... the footer of the front page now has a copyright of 1997 - 2005...

  74. An alternative idea by j-turkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You could just try dropping by their office, if you're anywhere near Blue Springs, MO (I assume that you are, since they're all about their local business).

    They list their address on their website:

    Office Address:
    (Not open to the public)
    Jump Domain, LLC
    1700 W 40 HWY
    Blue Springs, MO 64015
    Although they say it's not open to the public, I'll bet that popping by would yield better results than you've experienced previously. You probably want to be on your best, most diplomatic behavior; and most importantly, never show that you are angry (by raising your voice, calling names, making physical threats, wise cracks that can be misinterpreted). Ask the receptionist if you can speak with someone in support. If she gives you a hard time, politely ask to speak with her supervisor. Whomever you speak with, explain that your showing up there was a last resort, as your support requests were not being handled. This place sounds like a pretty small operation, so there is likely a single support person -- and I doubt that they'll just laugh in your face in person.

    In the unlikely event that he/she does give you a hard time, politely ask to speak with their manager. If the manager gives you a hard time, take down their name, and politely inform them that you will be disputing all charges with your credit card issuer, as well as disputing the issue with ICANN, and reporting them to the local BBB chapter. Then thank them for their time, excuse yourself, and be on your way. Most places don't want to deal with bureaucratic headaches, whether with credit card issuers, ICANN, or the BBB. Lastly, you can spend $100 and get an attorney to simply write a letter (you don't want to retain counsel, since that will be incredibly expensive compared to your potential returns, but a letter can have massive sway). Again, they probably just don't want to deal with the hassle. They'll give you what you want and you can part ways as pleasnatly as possible.

    --

    -Turkey

    1. Re:An alternative idea by TimElliott · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm about 5 minutes from there. I get off work in 45 minutes. I'll swing by that address and see what is in store :)

    2. Re:An alternative idea by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 1
      "Lastly, you can spend $100 and get an attorney to simply write a letter (you don't want to retain counsel, since that will be incredibly expensive compared to your potential returns, but a letter can have massive sway)."

      Save the $100 and send a letter certified mail.

      I have used this several times. Receiving certified mail scares the pants off some people. Maybe it suggests that you are ready to escalate the matter to a legal dispute. If this is indeed a 2-bit operation, such a letter could make them jump. (I guess it is because a threat of legal action can be blown off as a bluff, but acting as if you are creating a legal paper trail is ominous.)

    3. Re:An alternative idea by Mousit · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing that it's actually just a drop box, at some place like Mailboxes, Etc. or whatnot. I'd be curious to know if it really is.

  75. With HostsEurope, but worse by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

    My first ever domain - on a fairly expensive package for what I was using (£25/month and I was only using it for email).

    I cancelled my hosting with them, and asked for a domain transfer - only for it to turn out that they had registered my domain with their details.

    Nominet were helpless as they effectively owned the domain.

    They continued to bill me for 5-6 months after cancelling, which I have yet to be refunded.

    To finally take the biscuit, I've had a letter from Nominet offering the domain, but only after paying the outstanding $160 of charges owed on it by Host Europe.

    So, take that as a word of caution: stay clear from Hosts Europe.

    I'd suggest oneandone.co.uk if you're based in the UK, their service is very good, they even bend over backwards to allow you to move your domain from them. Cheap too.

  76. You decide... by Daytona89 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because the moderators are either:

    +5, Optimistic

    or

    -5, Naive

  77. Hosting provider who can help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just give us a call. We'd be happy to see what we can do for you www.scronline.com is the site and all the info including contact info is there for you.

  78. Squat by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

    I would find a lawyer first.

    BUT, knowing WHEN they expire, I would squat on them with a service like godaddy provides. You pay 18$. They buy it for you when it expires. Not sure how safe it is, but if you are going to lose them anyway...

  79. Avoid Resellers - Use ICANN Registrars Only! by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 1

    One simple tip that will greatly reduce the potential of problems is to use ICANN accredited registrars only.

    Avoid resellers.

    Check the official ICANN accredited list (.com / .net) at:

    http://www.internic.net/

    For other TLDs, check the corresponding registry for the list of accredited registrar(s).

    Domain name registries around the world (great resource and very stable - been using it for years):

    http://www.norid.no/domenenavnbaser/domreg.html

    Ron

  80. Namezero si teh suck by vivin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I used to have an account with Namezero. I tried many times to contact them, with no avail. They never answered any of my questions (through their website) or replied to any of my emails. I did a whois lookup on them to get a number and called them on that number. There were no returned called. I eventually just ended up saying "fuck you" to them and went with network solutions. I got them to transfer my stuff over to them because Namezero actually used to be a reseller or something for network solutions and I actually ended up with them because I had no one else to get in touch with. They went ahead and transferred me. A few weeks after the transfer a representative from Namezero contacted me apologizing profusely and saying that I should come back to them and that they would provide better service. In addition to reporting them to the better business bureau, I told them to fuck off. The best thing to do is just go with someone else AND report them.

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:Namezero si teh suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, it was the opposite. NS was the registrar and NZ the reseller, they only got their own registrar status about two years ago, at which point all customers (including me) who had bought a domain through them got transferred to NS. NZ said that customers would have now to pay to use their extra services (pointing to a specific url, mail aliases, subdomains, ...), but I never paid anything extra and still have their service working while my domain is now registered at NS (both control panels work). When my domain will be about to expire, I'll go to godaddy, since I'll get a service just as fine as NS but cheaper, and I'll do without the extra NZ stuff.

    2. Re:Namezero si teh suck by 0peth · · Score: 1

      I will second this sentiment. They consistently let me down, and I'm kicking myself for not trying a support call in my first year of using them before paying for five years.

      They get payments wrong, they ignore supports, and they have provably false things on their support sites. In one case where I actually got response from them, I had an issue that I brought up. I was told that it was working, and replied with examples showing that it was not (this exchange took multiple E-mails.) The support technician then declared he/she was stumped and passed me on to a second technician, who also claimed it worked. I re-pasted my long proof that it didn't work, and they also declared themselves stumped. After five months and 6 technicians, none of whom actually bothered to look at the backlog of support requests, I finally gave up.

      --
      "I'm feeling very shpongled. Smashed, mashed, completely geshtopenflapped."
  81. Re:yea it happens. by wallykeyster · · Score: 1, Informative

    Every experience I had with Network Solutions was negative. At least it was possible to get a person the telephone, but they were quite unhelpful. I was told to fax forms repeatedly because no on ever logged them into their system. Changing contact information was darn near impossible.

    Several years ago, a local web developer accepted money from many small businesses for hosting and development then skipped town. I tried to help a few recover their domain names but all gave up after a while because it simply wasn't worth the effort and cost. I did manage to change contact data on the domain of the hospital where I worked several years ago, but that took over a month.

    Learning from my mistakes, I went to Registar.com for my next round of domains. Everything went smoothly and I was happy with the support. Then, just as my registrations were about to expire, I got letters from Network Solutions thanking me for transferring the domains to them. I certainly had not requested any such move and couldn't get anyone at either registrar to explain how this happened. By this time the domains had expired so I couldn't transfer them anywhere else without paying Network Solutions to register them. Did I mention how much I hate those guys?

  82. Have you? This is what happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have YOU ever tried reporting anything to the BBB? I have a notebook that 4 months after I bought it the video memory on the motherboard was still bad and they refused to replace it. The notebook would power off about 6 times through the course of the day, and during that 4 month period, they had it almost as much as I did trying to "diagnose" the problem after I had already told them from my own diag that the video memory was bad.

    After contacting the BBB....I still have the notebook, I'm out $2200, and absolutely NOTHING happened to them. Incase you're wondering, they used to be a company we resold. But Chembook, Chem Corp, Chem USA, whatever they want to call themselves these days is NOT a reputible company.

  83. Typical /. reply (was Re:Extortion?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Valentine's day gift I bought my now-ex girlfriend her name dot com and threw up a little vanity site for her.

    You had a girlfriend... wow what was that like...?

    1. Re:Typical /. reply (was Re:Extortion?) by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 1

      In my experience, harder to understand than self-modifying code.

    2. Re:Typical /. reply (was Re:Extortion?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In code terms?

      You know the feeling you get when you write a program, and you are *certain* it should work. And it doesn't. And you pore over every line a dozen times, and each time you convince yourself that it *must* work, to the point of suspecting a compiler bug?

      You know *that* feeling of puzzlement coupled with disbelief? Women give you that feeling lots of times. "Hmmm... everything I know tells me that this should definitely work... but it doesn't?".

      Presumably, at some point, there is also the equivelant of finding the if (x = y) { line too, but I'm still looking for that :)

  84. From the Hosting Perspective by randomjibberish · · Score: 1

    I know my small hosting company has had issues with customers letting their domains lapse after repeated notices that they need to renew. Once the domain expires, it is very difficult to have companies like eNom allow the domain to be renewed again until the holding period is over. The problem is that end users are not educated enough about how registrars and DNS functions. Our single most common support question relates to DNS issues. The moral of the story is: don't let your domain expire! If you enjoy having a functioning web site and a domain name, be proactive and manage this asset.

  85. They hold on to valuable domains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen Network Solutions "hold on" to expired domains as long as a year or two. They are supposed to release them after 90 days, tops. But nope, somehow some expired domains don't get released. No doubt because NS has some sort of financial stake in keeping them.

  86. Nothing gets a corporate wonk's attention... by Who+drank+my+chocola · · Score: 1

    ...like a polite, but damning letter to the President of a company spelling out the sequence of events, your attempted steps at resolution, and his employees responses (or non-responses.) Make sure the letter explains that the next communication will be a summons and a subpeona for records of JD dealings with you.

    If the company is a legitimate business and you've slipped through the cracks (or were ignored by peons,) a senior manager can generally ask/force/cajole somebody into making your problem a priority. If they won't (or if the company is willfully defrauding people) then you should follow through on your threat, sue them in small claims court, and ask the judge to order them to release your domains to another registrar, refund your money, and pay court costs.

    Very few people (outside of actual hardened criminals) are willing to ignore a court order. You might find some crumudgeonly fuck out there who would do on "the principle that the gubmint shouldn't tell me how ta' run ma' bidness!", but that seems unlikely...

    --
    Tough day? How about a free Mac mini?
  87. Re:yea it happens. by angusmci · · Score: 1

    Oddly, the best service I ever had from NetSol was when I was transferring my last domain away from them. There was some kind of glitch in the process, and one of their support people took up the issue, gave me his direct email address so that I could contact him with any additional questions, and followed up later to make sure that everything had gone smoothly (which it had). Meanwhile, the registrar I was transferring to didn't answer a single email that I sent them. I was almost tempted to stay with NetSol.

  88. Re:What I'd do by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

    Sir, I would be hard pressed to believe your statement. I hard-refreshed the site and it maintained 1997-2003. I then went to a web proxy (firefoxproxy.com) and loaded the site, in case my version was cached. Indeed I tell you, it still stated 1997-2003!

    Doth thine eyes deceive?

    --
    For context, click Parent.
  89. Re:The Three Point Plan by ramdac · · Score: 0

    mod parent funny.

    I pissed myself

  90. I have two words for you: by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    vigilante justice.

  91. Re:yea it happens. by JonathanX · · Score: 1

    Same here. Over 5 years of trouble free service. I guess we're the luck ones.

  92. Re:The Three Point Plan by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 0, Redundant

    6) ? 7) Profit!

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  93. backordering your domains from other registrars? by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know it's a bit costly, but in the case when your domain does expire and your current registrar doesn't renew it, by backordering your domain using another registrar, but be the thing to save your domain at the end.

    godaddy offers this service for only $18.95.
    network solutions and namecheap goes through snapnames which cost $60, probably more reliable and better service, but i've never used either of them to really tell you what the difference is.

    What is Domain Name Backordering?
    If you "backorder" this name, we will ATTEMPT to grab it and to register it on your behalf, if and when it expires and once again becomes available.

    The low $18.95 backorder cost includes the registration fee, ICANN Fee, plus automatic monitoring and email alerts on changes to the Registrar, Status, Expiration Date, and Name Servers. Your domain backorder fee can be re-assigned to other names as often as you like, until you are successful in acquiring a domain name.

    You also have the option of making your backorder private -- which means your personal identifying information (name, phone number, email and home addresses) is shielded from public exposure in the WHOIS directory from the very moment the backordered domain is successfully acquired.

    Please understand that a backorder does not guarantee that you will acquire the domain name being backordered. The domain name you are backordering may be renewed by its current owner and not become available or we may be unsuccessful in our attempts to grab it and register it on your behalf.

    Once again if your backorder is not successful, it can be reassigned to another domain name. (And if your unsuccessful backorder is a private one, your private registration can be applied to any other backorder).


    hopefully your domains aren't that popular. then you shouldn't have much problem backordering them.

  94. Yet another glaring example of.... by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    ...getting what you pay for. Most people that I know that use cheap registrars end up with hastles like these.

    I get domains for $10 per year with great service, but that's from BulkRegister - and handle a lot of domains.

    That is not to say (of course) that no cheap registrar will give you good service, neither do I imply that an expensive registrar will give you better service. However, when you pick a cheap, relatively unheard of registrar, you ARE taking your chances.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:Yet another glaring example of.... by eckeric · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I am going through this right now. I have a site that I registered through one small site years ago. At some point they merged with someone else, which has been ok. However, I have one site that I renewed a few days before it expired. For some reason, they took the money, but couldn't actually renew it (something about 10 days), so it lapsed. They just told me on the phone something about renewing it "new" rather than renewing it during the grace period. They said something about not all sellers allowing a 40 day grace period. Does that sound true? I thought that everyone had to do that.

  95. Re:The Three Point Plan by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 0, Redundant

    May a you be visited by a diseased yak who wants to eat your spleen

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
  96. windex.org ... by windex · · Score: 1

    windex.org was locked up by NSI for about 4 years after they claimed to not receive my payment by check (they cashed 2 of them just fine, though). This was pre-multiple registars, though. I made multiple attempts to get the domain back, and eventually every set of communcation led to getting a supervisor, having them tell me they'd call me back, and them never doing so.

    When it came up in 2002, I had 3 domain-watching companies fixed on it, and thus, recovered it without incident.

    I did everything short of getting a lawyer involved. Getting a lawyer involved may not matter, in my opinion. They aren't really accountable to anyone in the real world. It's like a landlord who goes out to his rentals, changes all the locks, then takes a flight to tahiti for a couple years without giving tennants a key. How do you realistically do something about that?

  97. multiple backorders just in case? by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    maybe have multiple backorders from multiple registrars just in case?

    that being said, aside from that, i've always wondered what happens in the case when more than one person backorders a domain using the same registrar. is it a first come first serve, or do they have a bidding system?

  98. Re:The Three Point Plan by sH4RD · · Score: 1

    How would they win? All you have to due is prove what you said was true...

    --
    WASTE - The Secure P2P
  99. Re:yea it happens. by museumpeace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    network solutions has been less of a pain than some. It is about the most expensive way I have ever parked a domain. I just transfered a domain from Nonworking solutions to Tucows, and all on the day its registration expired. NS now leaves such domains in REGISTRAR LOCK status and you have to call to get it unlocked so your new registrar can pick it up...awkward but safe. The transfer went down smoothly. Ask me about Tucows [and their reseller canaca.com] in a year.
    other than outrageous cost, the thing about NS that bothered me the most was that the default "under construction" page they provide for parked domains was festooned with links to hard core porn labeled as "related" pages. Can you imagine trying to stake out a name for your business only to find that customers who visit your site when you finally turn on your content are saying "hey where's your pornography" [and imagine all the customers you really wanted who will never visit you again and you never know why]

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  100. You're missing the point by ErikTheRed · · Score: 4, Funny
    As a Valentine's day gift I bought my now-ex girlfriend her name dot com and threw up a little vanity site for her. Anyway, now that we're not together, she wants me to transfer the domain to her. I'm not sure why, but I refused, and she said that if I don't give it to her, even though (I think) I am safely the legal owner of the domain despite its being her first and last name, she'd "sick my dad's lawyers on you anyway."
    Give her the domain - it was a gift, dude; even if she was a bitch, you're still being a dick by not giving it to her. Anyway, give it to her, then post this sob story again and again on Slashdot, along with the URL. Watch her bandwidth bills skyrocket or her site get shut down for exceeding quota. Have a nice day.
    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:You're missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Funny, I was in a similar kind of situation. Gave my girlfriend a domain for her birthday, and the next day, you know, she bounces around with my best friend.

      However, I am not vindicative, no. I transferred the domain to her. Btw, they made good use of it, and now they use it to host their party sound & light outfit on it, which they founded three months later.

      In case you're interested, the URL is codex.lu

    2. Re:You're missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh.

      First page: pointless Flash intro.

      Second page: "Our site has been designed to be viewed at superior screen resolutions. To allow you full surfing pleasure, a fullscreen window will be opened."

      Even the third page (which does not, in fact, open in a fullscreen window - at least not in Opera or Firefox) doesn't have any actual information.

      They suck.

  101. Re:Registrar vs Registrar; how about restricing by davidsyes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    registrars.

    Who the hell even had the power to create a lease/lien situation on domains for these entities?

    It is now time to change by FORCE the model in which site name registrants own and control their names.

    For example, motorists in NO WAY surrender ownership of their to a toll booth operator when their car breaks down or runs out of gas on the road. The vehicle has a license, and it is allocated, issued, and annually or every two years checked by a DMV.

    For registrars to have a mafioso grip on domain names is insane, thievery, and unctuous. It ought to be ILLEGAL for a registrar to take the name of a defunct site operator or to sell it.

    However, the registrars will cry foul, and will also say they invest time, energy, research, and other resources into setting up and activating domains for users. Well, to me, that's no justification for locking an account.

    But, this BS stance can be alleviated simply by charging the applicant/registrant $10 more for an insurance fee that their domain will NEVER be locked, blocked, or obstructed and that the registrant can change to any registrar at any time, without any DNS-excusing mumbo-jumbo.

    Registrars should be forced to operate under a "toll road analogy" in which derelict or broken-down or abandoned vehicles (sites/domains) are tagged, warned, then towed, but NOT owned by the registrar. However, as is typical in modern corruption, sometimes tow companies are as unctuous as rogue and self-serving policy makers can be. SO, we need an electronic grave yard or tow yard which the site's owner can come to reclaim their site. SO, the boneyard/graveyard/towyards also are prohibited, under this model, from hijacking and extorting or bulk-selling off domain names.

    Yet, there IS the problem of cybersquatters and of those who don't in timely fashion reasonably respond to questions by other companies and domain holders about potential infringement of name or likeness. If people would be more reasonable about being a "player in the field" instead of impeding competitors who are doing a legitimate, fair job of competing, and if instead of unfairly sidling up to a domain name for unfair purposes people would cease or desist their acts, the registrars would by default be rightfully stripped of some of the inexplicable and far-ranging powers they wield over domain holders.

    I would propose that anyone registering for a domain would need to show intent or proof to use the domain imminently (as in under 10 to 20 days time). If they need more time, they could PARK the domain, provided it is for marketing or tactical reasons and not for mere cybersquatting or extortion purposes.

    I would propose that the domain contact details require that an identifiable person be physically cataloged if that person can appear before a local office. Otherwise, the business or non-profit or research entity registering a domain should be electronically tied to a city, county, state or federal employer/business registry. This would make it possible for legit companies to establish fair-play appearances.

    Individuals, or entities not actually doing business but intending to later convert to profit or non-profit business status, such as bloggers, certain reporters, and information sites should be required to personally register the domain via some utility-like office in their community (unless facial anonymity is a paramount requirement, in the case of authors or publishers of factual but contentious/controversial intellectual material/stories).

    That said, some measures may make my above suggestions irrelevant or partially covered. But, there also needs to be an implemented method to deter individuals and business or marketing entities from just making up and registering a warchest/ database of names that never get used, never get surrendered, and clog up the domain registration systems. Maybe an activity counter (possibly Google could do this but ONLY for a country in which that government ALLOWS Google to do this:) to in

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  102. Only on Slashdot is this a problem by pmancini · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sue them. That is why we have the Goverment. You don't need a lawyer. Just take some time off, go to the local circuit court, fill out the paper work and figure out what your damages are. Put it at something reasonable like $500. If they even bother to show up, just present your paperwork and some screenshots of what your website looked like. The judge will likely find in your favor and you can move on. If he doesn't then who cares? They would have a HUGE legal bill fighting a $500 complaint.

    Offer to settle out of court first, give them time to respond to your complaint (30 days is normal) then submit the paperwork. Its a simple civil process.

    Why are people on Slashdot so afraid of exercising their rights and using the courts to protect them? That is what they are there for.

    1. Re:Only on Slashdot is this a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike you -- apparently -- most of us our poor hackers that are accustomed to free as in beer, speech, and whatever other analogy you can come up with. We can't afford lawyers. Good to hear that you're doing so well in this tough economy, though. You see, use of the government is a 2 edged sword. If I sue someone, they're likely to counter sue *me* for whatever made-up reason. *Especially* if they are a corporation that can afford to destroy an "uppity" and defenseless consumer like myself. "Justice" is bought and sold in this country to the highest bidder, not the one in the right.

    2. Re:Only on Slashdot is this a problem by oldosadmin · · Score: 1

      We can't afford lawyers

      I didn't read anything in the gp post about lawyers. A normal person can spend the small amount ($20?) to file a Small Claims court complaint, and usually if you have a decent case, you can win.

      --
      Jay | http://oldos.org
    3. Re:Only on Slashdot is this a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you will likely be crossing state lines, this is considered interstate trade and is regulated by federal courts, not your hickville JP or minicipal court that handles traffic tickets and local disputes.

    4. Re:Only on Slashdot is this a problem by Grimster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's $142 to file a small claims complaint where I live, if you win it's added to the judgement, if you lose you eat it, but you have to pay the $142 up front. Not quite $20 and even if you DO win, you've only won a judgement, the courts don't COLLECT for you that's your problem. Just what I was told by the county court clerk when I thought about suing a real estate agent who royally screwed me over.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
    5. Re:Only on Slashdot is this a problem by pmancini · · Score: 1

      Yep, court time is not free. In Tennessee where I live it costs $48 to file a complaint. $142 is more but in the grand scheme of things if the object of the complaint is important to you then it's worth the money.

      The only way you can lose a case like this is not being prepared or acting out in court. Just present the facts and be level headed. Once you get the judgement then you file a lien. Trust me, no one wants one on their credit report.

      Also, if the case instead was a subcontracting issue where the guy was working for a contractor on a project you could ALSO put the lein on the company that owns the project. A realestate example would be A has a house built by Contracter B who hires C to do the plumbing. B doesn't pay C who then puts a lein on both A and B. A gets pissed off and sues the bejesus out of B, meanwhile B still owes C and has crap credit.

      Courts work. Do we here at Slashdot believe in democracy, free and open government or are we just veneful warlords? I'd prefer to live in America than Afganistan any day.

  103. Something like this happened to me once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I registered a couple of domain names (including one that is my first and last name.com) with one of those "Free" domain / hosting thingees where you pay $30 and get 1 year of low quality web hosting and a domain name registration for a year.

    It actually worked well for about six months, then, the company was "bought" by someone in Costa Rica or some place in Central America... then, my web sites were down for several weeks, would come back up for a week or two and then would be down again for ridiculous amounts of time (basically, no one was monitoring them).

    Of course, their "Support Desk" was more like a circular file and I got one response after numerous attempts to contact them saying they were on it, then nothing (radio static).

    Part of the $30 was for the domain name (which they unfortunately registered "on your behalf"). This means all but one of the domain contacts was me!

    I started to get worried that I would have my domain name fall off the face of the earth and I didn't have access to change the DNS servers or anything because the hosting company had registered for me and gave me no self-serve login.

    I finally tracked down the company the actual registrar (for which the hosting company was just reselling, of course) and after a long series of increasingly unpleasant emails from me to them, they finally tried to do something about it.

    The first thing they told me was to contact the reseller. I told them, thanks but I've been trying that... for months! After a lot of convincing they got off their butts and tried to contact their reseller and got the same radio static I got so they helped me out (they made it seem like they were doing me this huge favor when all I wanted was approval to transfer to another registrar to be able to salvage my domain name out of this mess even if I would get screwed with the web hosting).

    They finally approved me and I transferred to Godaddy... I lost one of the domain names (it wasn't a big deal to lose this one and I didn't put much effort into fighting it) but kept the one with my name because I basically complained and ranted until someone got annoyed enough with me to do something to get me to shut up.

    So, basically, my strategy to get this was to go over their heads to the actual registrar and make enough noise to become annoying and have them do something to get me off thier case! Patience is the best thing for this as a lot of the replies to weeks to a month to get back to me and they took forever trying to contact the reseller and finally gave up (they gave them a huge benefit of the doubt) and let me get what I wanted.

    Basically, as someone else pointed out... If you don't have a lot of money to hire a lawyer and/or take this to court you're almost at the mercy of the companies that are screwing you over. Be persistent and logical and if that doesn't work, be annoying to get results.

  104. Damn by GotenXiao · · Score: 1

    I feel for you dude, I really do. One of my dad's domains got stuck with a hosting company (we were with them a month. Then they got taken over. Then the new guys got hacked. Then the new guys wouldn't give us our domain back or change any of the WHOIS). We finally managed to get it transferred to another account on OnlineNIC (which, incidentally, is one of the worst registrars I have ever seen. Their interface sucks).
    Want a good registrar? DNBuy.net.
    DNS updates within 5 minutes, usually, and the interface is a piece of cake to use, even for the internet illiterate (my dad proved that :P)

    --
    Goten Xiao
  105. I think you mean... (take 2) by waynegoode · · Score: 1
    The one time I forget to check my links...

    I think you mean namecheap.com. I also use them with no complaints.

  106. so in other words... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you went from domain hosting to domain hosing

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  107. Re:What I'd do by nocomment · · Score: 1

    I just went to the page for the first time after reading this, and it still says 2003. I have never been to the site before. Just to be sure (since I do go through a transparent squid proxy) I also ssh'd to the FTP server (on it's own DSL line, and ran lynx. Here's the last line:
    ?1997 - 2003 Jump Domain, LLC. All rights reserved.

    I dunno what that guy was talking about.

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
  108. Along the same lines. by jelwell · · Score: 1

    What do you do when someone steals your credit card and makes purchases?

    Sheesh people. Do you need Slashdot readers to tell you how to dial 911 when there's a burglar in your house? Or how to call your credit card company to fight fraudulent charges?

    Tomorrow on Ask Cliff (who apparently doesn't know much): "Do I need a computer to file my taxes?". I'll spoil the post and save millions of readers from the pain of having to read through the heartbreaking story: Go to the post office!

    Try the Better Business Bureau - it *always* works for me when I have a problem with any business.
    Joseph Elwell.

  109. Domain Registrars by MrMagooAZ · · Score: 1

    I've had no issues with PairNIC (www.pairnic.com). I use them as well as their hosting services (www.pair.com) and have ZERO complaints about their services.

  110. Get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed so many complaints on here about "registrar horror stories". But I notice ALL of them are coming from either no-name registrars, or netsol (big surprise there). Yet no horror stories from Domain Discover (registrar we use), or even GoDaddy which as far as I'm concerned is a bit on the shadey side. Sure we pay more for our DD registration, but I'll tell you what, never ONCE have I had a domain malfunction in ANY way.

    After all, isn't it about quality service? Compare a KIA with a BMW. You pay more for the BMW, but you also get a solid car that will last for decades, the KIA will be lucky to last through the warrenty. I drive an 88 Volvo, the car still looks brand new (except for the cracks starting in the paint on the roof), runs like new, and has a service record like a new car. Sure it was a $35k car in 1988, but it's now 18 years old and puts my uncle's 2003 Explorer, my Grandfather's 2002 F-350, My Aunt's 2001 Hyundai, and my other Uncle's 2002 Chevy Tahoe to shame by spending less time in the shop than any one of them. Actually, mine hasn't even been down other than routine maint.(oil, rotate tires, fluid flushes, brake pads, things like that) which I do myself in over 5 years.

    I digress a bit, but the moral of the story is, if you're gonna be a cheapskate, expect to get cheap products and expect to have to deal with it.

  111. Registrar transfer by ubernostrum · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this be a great example of where the new ICANN registrar transfer policy is useful? If they really are the registrar (instead of just a reseller frontend for eNom or someone else), initiate a transfer to a new registrar and it should go through in five days.

  112. well its 40 below and i dont give a puck by frozencanuck · · Score: 1

    Registrars you can not contact, previous contractor as admin and tech contact bitter about being fired, domain in desperate need of administration! Try to get CIRA to initiate an emergency change of admin contact for the .ca domain - enough polar bear poo to clog your igloo hole shut. Finally phone tech support for previous contractors email address, low and behold it was suspended for lack of payment - sympathetic tech (dealt with CIRA before) gives me access to old contractors spam magnet. Transfer domain registrar - pay for ten years.

  113. iRegistrations ...... by batteryman · · Score: 1

    iRegistrations went out of business. They were a reseller of eNom. So I called eNom and transfered all my domains. One of them I had to renew so that was $29.95 a year.

  114. register.com by Hohlraum · · Score: 1

    they turn on autorenew on our commercial domains every year after explicitly turning it off every year. they start the renewal process over a month in advance. 1/12th of the entire contract. jerk offs.

  115. Happy with registrar Dotster.com by scotch51 · · Score: 1

    FWIW, I'm a very happy customer of registrar Dotster and have been for about six years. Pricing is pretty standard $14.95/year for domains $9.95 to transfer from other registrars. IMNSHO What sets them apart, and makes them worth a bit more than the rock bottom registrars, is that you can reach a real human being in tech support within about 10 minutes.

    --
    In Nearly All Paradigms, Shift Happens.
    1. Re:Happy with registrar Dotster.com by douglask · · Score: 1

      Same here... I've been with them for years and you couldn't pay me to switch.

      They don't sell via Spam, they are stable, and they are accessible. They have my vote of cash.

      --
      DouglasK Do Justly. Love Mercy. Walk humbly with your God.
  116. I have used JumpDomain for almost 5 years... by SubDude · · Score: 1

    I have used JumpDomain for almost 5 years and have been VERY HAPPY with their service.

    I have a hard time understanding what is going on.

    My last service (domain renewal for two domains) went through without a hitch January of this year.

    I believe it is a one man operation - perhaps Scott is unable to reply at this time for reasons beyond his control.

    I will email and ask what is going on.

    Dude

  117. Re:Make a fuss... by Morlark · · Score: 1

    Simple answer: Do exactly the same back to them. Might not acheive anything, but it'll be fun.

    --
    Santa's suicide mission go!
  118. BBB Ratings don't mean diddly by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually an unsatisfactory record due to unanswered complaints just means they didn't respond one way or another to the BBB. Either you have responded to the BBB or you haven't. If you have responded to the BBB but not made anyone happy you get a satisfactory rating. If you just blow off the BBB because they lack any power or jurisdiction over you and you don't want to take the time to respond to some nut case then you get an unsastifactory rating. Ratings from the BBB really don't mean anything anymore. The only benefit you get with the BBB is if the company is willing to work the the BBB (they are under no obligation to do so ever) to negotiate between the customer and the company. Take the rating with a grain of salt

    --
    Quality Hosting e3 Servers
  119. Moniker.com is great - personal service by PornMaster · · Score: 1

    You really should check into Moniker.com. While it's double what you're going to pay at $CHEAP_REGISTRAR if you're only going for a few domains, their CEO Monte Cahn, in addition to being a damn fine individual, hosts a weekly "internet radio" show called Domain Masters on http://www.webmasterradio.fm/ Wednesday nights at 7PM EDT. Just listening for a bit lets you see how well he understands the undeerlying issues. His guests (sometimes they're even his competition) are top notch. You can listen to the show archives at http://www.webmasterradio.fm/episodes/index.php?sh owId=20.

  120. Are you suprised? by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Do you really think anybody can sell domains for $8 a year and still afford to pay a competant support staff?

    If there's more to your web site than a few static pages, you spend hundreds of dollars a year on hosting and bandwidth. It boggles the mind that people will do that, then try to save a few bucks on the domain registration.

    Personally, I often wish that .com registrations had stayed at $50. Yeah yeah, Network Solutions was making a lot of money for very little work. Wasn't the worst thing in the world. Not as bad as having all the best domain names snapped up by opportunists who either sit on them or use them to host porn.

    1. Re:Are you suprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think anybody can sell domains for $8 a year and still afford to pay a competant support staff?

      GoDaddy.com seems to do it.

    2. Re:Are you suprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GoDaddy is getting money from someplace else. They spent more on a single Super Bowl ad than their entire annual domain/web hosting revenue.

    3. Re:Are you suprised? by Xochil · · Score: 1

      The only place they're getting their money from is the hoards of admins with a clue moving to them.

      Super Bowl ads make sense when you hundreds of thousands of new user revenue with hopes to get hundreds of thousands more.

      --Mike

    4. Re:Are you suprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      "The only place they're getting their money from is the hoards of admins with a clue moving to them."

      They aren't paying to work there. I know a lot more than I'm telling you about GoDaddy.

  121. Jump Domain by wytcld · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jump Domain went to the dark side about two years ago. I had a similar experience with one domain - but it was an .org which was still with Tucows while they were transitioning, and Tucows' own DomainDirect.com was able to slip me the secret code required to confirm the transfer. Subsequently with a couple of other domains I did manage to get eNom to help. So you might want to try again to get through to the right people there by phone. Also, although ICANN tries to say they will not help, if you get an e-mail through to the right place, they did in the latter case send their own query to eNom letting them know that they were looking over their shoulder on this.

    I've had no problem with a couple dozens domains at DomainDirect so far. In past experience Network Solutions, Dotster, Register.com all suck, although none as badly as JumpDomain does now. Scott at JumpDomain used to be responsive, but I don't even know if it's his operation any more.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  122. You Get What You Pay For by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's unfortunate that these kinds of things happen, but I suggest anyone registering a domain name to consider more than price when making a selection.

    1. Re:You Get What You Pay For by Xochil · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't mean on cannot get quick and competent service as well as cheap prices. The two are not mutually exclusive. Case in point: godaddy.com --Mike

  123. Ah, the games we play... by JavaRob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In my defense, I told her no matter what happened I'd maintain the site and make any changes she wanted or had someone else do and then upload it myself, a gesture of good faith, and she immediately brought up lawyers.

    This isn't much of an argument -- you're forcing her to "trust" the guy she just broke up with to maintain a site all about her? An act of good faith would be to give her the domain and let her take down the site; this is a mind game. You're trying to "punish" her for her attitude, or for whatever other grievances you have. I know how this kind of stuff happens; someone hurts you and you want to hurt them back... but the fact is that the best way to get back at her would be to move on with your life, enjoy yourself, and make yourself a nice life as if she'd never existed.

    Shut the site down, pass off the domain name to her brother or something (so it's off your hands), and move on. Doing something (like hanging the domain name like a sword over her head) expressly to drive her nuts are what you do while you're still in a relationship -- if there's no relationship anymore, it's time to quit.

    1. Re:Ah, the games we play... by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is no longer relavent to the original question but I dumped her, partly because of trust issues, and that she made the threat pre-emptively made the move seem more palatable to me. I couldn't trust her not to make white (or worse) lies and well, she couldn't trust me with a domain name. Funny how the slashdot crowd presumes if someone has had a girlfriend at any point and the relationship ended that it was the guy who got dumped.

    2. Re:Ah, the games we play... by JavaRob · · Score: 1

      It sounds like neither of you were too keen on each other by that time, so I'm not sure it matters much. Either way, not much fun; good luck getting your head sorted out again.

      Cheers.

    3. Re:Ah, the games we play... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      ISTM that even if you can't bring yourself to hand over the domain and website, a reasonable compromise might be to just let the domain and hosting expire, then leave it up to her as to what she wants to do with it.

      You can't recover from a bad relationship until you get rid of all the associated baggage :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  124. Try Yahoo by AaronW · · Score: 1

    I bought a few domains using Yahoo for $5/year and so far have had zero issues. I plan to move my domains over from Register.com to Yahoo since I'm still paying like $30/year through Register, unfortunately they still have a fair amount of time on them. Also, like Register.com, Yahoo provides DNS services.

    -Aaron

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  125. Jumpdomain's "About Us by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Jumpdomain can't even use correct English on their "About us" page, which doesn't give me great confidence about their ability to get little details right in domain registration either. ("it's" should be "its", and one hopes that the founder has a "Juris Doctor" degree from an actual law school as opposed to a "Jurist Doctor" degree from an illiterate mail-order diploma printer...)

    Sure, spelling/grammar flames are normally tacky, but not only do compilers bitch at you for getting your programming-language spelling and syntax incorrect (thus geeks ought to be good at them), but your ability to get spelling and grammar correct does indicate something about your level of effort, and about your willingness to use automated tools (like spell-checkers) if you're not natively good at spelling, grammar, or (in my case) typing.

    And the "About Us

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Jumpdomain's "About Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..but your ability to get spelling and grammar correct does indicate something about your level of effort, and about your willingness to use automated tools (like spell-checkers) if you're not natively good at spelling, grammar, or (in my case) typing.

      The bolded comma is incorrect. A comma only comes after "and" if what follows is an independent clause.

  126. Re:The Three Point Plan by Uart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They would lose, but swamp you in time and money consuming legal "stuff" during the trial. You'd most likely need to hire a lawyer. It would cost you more than the value of your domains (in most cases) to fight it out.

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
  127. Re:Jumpdomain's "About Us" looks Bad... by billstewart · · Score: 1
    (As I was saying about bad typing, I seem to have hit the Enter key instead of a quote-mark before I was done editing :-)

    So Jump Domain's "About Us" page calls itself a legal disclaimer, not that it's particularly disclaiming anything, though it does indicate an unwillingness to provide accurate contact information, like the name of the human who operates it.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  128. Re:Elevation by symbolic · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for a tilt/pan feature, where you can move the image so that you're looking at it sideways (and much closer, of course). The satellite feature is nice, but it seems like the only thing you can use it for is to verify your location if you happen to be flying in a plane..."Yep, this is the right place, I recognize the top of the building!" Or, if you happen to be on foot, I suppose you could walk in and ask the building manager if he/she could take you to the roof for a minute to make sure it's the right one.

  129. Domain is part of that kind of gift by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even if you are or are not maintaining the website for her, the domain name ought to be hers, and if you're being stubborn about the $6-$35 "ownership" you might have in it, you're being a jerk about the wrong things and ought to put the energy into something else. And if she feels like pointing the domain name somewhere else and writing a blog or a rant about her ex-boyfriend, well, it goes with the territory :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  130. They're the real registrar by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative

    If Jumpdomain's just a reseller for eNom, then eNom is definitely the right place to go, because they're the real registrar.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  131. Re:The Three Point Plan by Mousit · · Score: 5, Informative

    Considering I'd all but exhausted all the other options, yes, getting it out on Slashdot was actually an intentional plan. It also worked, though not with JD itself.

    On calling again, I was able to talk with eNom's Transfers and Registration Manager, whom actually connected my story as related over the phone, to this article. Imagine that! I was provided EPP codes, and my .com domains were unlocked, including the expired one. Under eNom's system, an expired domain that is not in hold or lock, can be transferred. Thus, provided these transfers go through, I get everything back.

    Jump Domain doesn't get their credibility back, but I still win. Hah.

  132. Joker.com by Omega · · Score: 1, Informative

    I've had good experience with Joker.com (German based) for the past 5 years. Prices are $12 USD per domain per year, they provide registration for all the standard TLD's (org, net, com) and the crap TLD's (biz, info) :). Management is all through a self service web UI (renew/transfer/update/etc).

  133. Better Business Bureau by Spazmania · · Score: 2, Informative

    The BBB local to the company is usually a good place to start. Letters from the BBB tend to make it to the upper echelon at the company in question.

    You won't necessarily get results, lots of companies fail to act on the BBB's letters. But they all read them. Its a good place to start, and its free.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  134. GoDaddy web site has many, many, many ads. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    The GoDaddy web site is always trying to sell something, actually a hundred things. In my opinion, the GoDaddy web site is arranged to intimidate people who aren't really knowledgeable.

    1. Re:GoDaddy web site has many, many, many ads. by rtphokie · · Score: 1

      The GoDaddy web site is always trying to sell something, actually a hundred things. In my opinion, the GoDaddy web site is arranged to intimidate people who aren't really knowledgeable.

      And rebates are arranged for people to forget to send them in. Either way I make out because I send in all my rebates and I politely decline GoDaddy's additional offers for services I dont need.

    2. Re:GoDaddy web site has many, many, many ads. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I agree that GoDaddy's website is amazingly stinky, and in fact I've complained about it to them many times... but as a registrar, I've been very happy with their service -- including Real Human customer service (that once even helped fix a problem that wasn't actually their fault).

      Since I only have to visit the site once or twice a year, I manage to survive using it. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  135. Knock on Jump Domain's Door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DOH!!

    I lived in Blue Springs a year ago, I don't remember them if they had a sign on their building. There was one place however that went dark, and I forget their name. They were on 40 HWY near (The freeway that leads to Kansas City)

  136. Free Domain! by permittivity · · Score: 1

    My domain registrar is doing me some real good right now.

    I registered my domain for a year. I tried to pay them for another year but they wouldn't take my money.

    Yet, after the year was up, I am still able to use it. Heck, it's been almost 3 months since the year was up.

  137. Don't trust itsyourdomain.com either! by Sebby · · Score: 1
    From our own experiences, and as you'll see by the few reviews on Amazon, as well as just googling for it, you'll see this registrar is not to be trusted either.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    1. Re:Don't trust itsyourdomain.com either! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have all my domains through them and zero problems.

    2. Re:Don't trust itsyourdomain.com either! by Grimster · · Score: 1

      I had a run-in with IYD a while back when a customer tried to transfer a domain to us, he finally gave up and registered a new domain similar to what had and started over.

      I emailed icann I emailed IYD I emailed everyone I could find called what I could and nothing happened. Filed icann complaints, the customer filed complaints, and nada, nothing.

      IYD is the worst I've yet to encounter, register.com, registerfly, melbourneit are all bad but IYD is the winner hands down for slimy.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
    3. Re:Don't trust itsyourdomain.com either! by Sebby · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.. you sound just like one of those glowing amazon reviews...

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  138. Looks like an office to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=39.012065,-94.25684 8&spn=0.007,0.008&t=k&hl=en

  139. Re:Elevation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you can!

    Go check out NASA's World Wind.

    For an example, the following shows where OSCON will be, and where my host for that week lives.

    http://ali.as/OSCON

  140. Re:Blue Springs Info by kcdude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live in Blue Springs. The 740 W 40 Hwy address is a UPS Store (was a Mailboxes Etc.) I can't remember what is at 1700 W 40 Hwy. This search shows several businesses in the plaza. No Jump Domain is listed.
    http://www.411.com/10668/search/Reverse_Address?ho usenumber=1700&street=W+40+Hwy&city_zip=64015&stat e_id=MO

    I can drive by tomorrow.

  141. threats seem to work by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    last time i had to change the DNS record for my domain and eNameco's system returned error (second time it happened) i decided to look for another registrar. after a week trying to unlock the domain without an answer to my tickets, i finally sent them an e-mail threatening legal action, with copies to ICANN and Texas state's general attorney.

    a day later the domain was unlocked and i moved it.

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  142. pairNic holding on to expired domain by hatique · · Score: 1

    One of the domains I manage expired 31st march, and registrar pairnic.com is simply refusing a transfer. They're insisting I renew the domain with them ($20) BEFORE I can transfer to another registrar. They don't even make a support phone number available.

  143. Jumpdomain is one man: Scott Ison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Jumpdomain is my former registrar. I too lost a domain to Scott Ison's bullshit. he runs Jumpdomain himself, as an easy way to make cash. it's an easy way to watch cash roll in because he does not perform any support for the domains he sells.

    anyway, if you have a problem with his policies, you should call his home phone number: (816) 228 - 1901. his home address is unlisted but he lives in Blue Springs, MO.

    sorry to post this anonymously, but Scott Ison is also a lawyer.

    1. Re:Jumpdomain is one man: Scott Ison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A anywho.com reverse lookup on that does not come up with Scott Ison....and it comes up with an address...

  144. ICANN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recall similar issues in the past (related to a company I worked with). If you read over ICANN's docs, they basically absolve themselves of any responsiblity to get involved. I think it would be appropriate for them to have some involvement as this problem becomes more widespread - certainly evident in current trends. If a registrar faced losing their ability to sell/process domains - with demonstrated authority by ICANN - that could be powerful motivator.

  145. I am also a burnt customer of jumpdomain by wayne · · Score: 4, Informative
    Wow.

    I am *JUST* *NOW* managing to get my last five domains away from jumpdomain after a 6 month process. I'll post the messages I've sent at the end, but I'll give you a quick run down now.

    • I tried contacting jumpdomain many times via many different methods, including email, filing problem reports and phoning. Every such attempt failed to reach a human. The problem reports were never responded to and eventually they were deleted.
    • I have filed a complaint with internic earlier this year. It didn't do any good.
    • The contact point for eNom on the internic website is an email address that now bounces and used to go into a black hole.
    • I have *JUST* *TODAY* gotten good response to transfers@enom.com. Jason Cluphf was most helpful.
    • I had problems contacting tucows also, but fortunately the domains that I registered via jumpdomain that ended up at tucows were all .com and .net, and there is a new rule that by default, the transfers have to go through. The domains that I had with jumpdomain/enom were .org domains.
    Ok, the following is an email that I've sent in various forms to about a dozen different emails over the last 4 months.

    To: matt@enom.com, transfers@enom.com, abuse@enom.com
    Subject: I am having problems with your reseller, jumpdomain.com
    From: wayne
    Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:05:17 -0500
    Message-ID:

    Help!

    I got your email address from http://www.internic.net/registrars/registrar-48.ht ml

    Your eNom reseller, jumpdomain.com, appears to have dropped off the face of the earth. I have been using jumpdomain.com since the mid 90's, but now I'm having big problems with them.

    I need auth codes to transfer the following domains: elgin-watches.org elginwatch.org libspf2.org trusted-forwarder.org

    This is the second time this year I've tried to transfer these domains away from you and your reseller. The last time, I not only didn't get any response from your reseller, but I didn't get any response from you and the transfer timed out.

    I *WAS* able to transfer my .com domains away from you last January because when you didn't respond, the transfer went through by default. Unfortunately, there is no such policy for .org domains (yet).

    *** PLEASE DO SOMETHING ***

    On Oct 2, 2004, I renewed several domains, including elginwatches.org. All the other domains went through fine, but elginwatches.org remained in a "Pending" status. I didn't notice this until late Oct, but that wasn't a problem elginwatches.org didn't come up for renewal until Jan 11, 2005.

    On Nov 10, the domain still hadn't finished the renewal process, so I filed a trouble ticket with jumpdomain's support system. Nothing happened, but hey, there was still a couple of months. On Dec 02, I updated the trouble ticket pointing out that this needed to be fixed, but still nothing. No response from jumpdomain, and elginwatches.org was still "pending".

    On Dec 8, I still had no response from jumpdomain, so I filed another trouble ticket with a higher priority. On Dec 11, I got a 30-day warning about my From jumpdomain that and I replied to that message, filing another trouble ticket. Still no response.

    Unfortunately, I was busy during the holidays and didn't file another bug report until early Jan. A couple of days later, I notice that the bug report hadn't shown up, so I filed another one on Jan 8, this time marked as "urgent." I tried calling the Jumpdomain support line, even though they said that for domain registration, I was only supposed to use the web forms. Even during their limited support hours, I never was able to reach anyone.

    On Jan 10, I tried transfering my domains away from jumpdomain, but I am unable to complete the transaction because I can't get the "auth codes". Jumpdomain has no place on the their website to request them, and they haven't responded to my request for them via their web support system.

    I have continued to try and contact jumpdomain.com, but have still had zero luck getting *any* response from them.

    --
    SPF support for most open source mail servers can be found at libspf2.
  146. Re:The Three Point Plan by wayne · · Score: 3, Informative
    1) get a front page article on Slashdot slandering said registrar with negative publicity.

    Truth is a 100% defense against charges of slander and libel. I can't speak for the submitter, but I am very willing to testify in court that almost the exact thing has happened with me and jumpdomain.

    See this slashdot post for more details of my case.

    --
    SPF support for most open source mail servers can be found at libspf2.
  147. Re:The Three Point Plan by Equinox11 · · Score: 1

    Written "slander" is libel. And it only qualifies if it is untrue.

  148. Re:Registrar vs Registrar; how about restricing by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I guess the mod-dunce on my comment won't be satisifed until the registrars do to him/her or to someone he/she CARES about what has happened to others..

    I think I covered the real problems with these locks: Hypercapitalist acquisition of names and domains when people trip up. Registrar entities make excelllent vacuum cleaners for biz and some of or many of the marketing types who cannot enact or wake up their own imagination.

    OTOH, the modder is beholden to the registrar system, I suppose.

    (Sighs in profound incredulity at some creatures feigning intelligence or empathy...)

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  149. Transfer to another OpenSRS reseller DOES work by jcdill · · Score: 1

    I had a similar problem where one of my domains expired because the OpenSRS reseller's renewal process was broken. I called OpenSRS, they said to pick another OpenSRS reseller because since it was staying with the same registrar (OpenSRS) it could be transfered without the reseller's cooperation or ack, and without my having to pay the ex-reseller's renewal fee first. I moved my domain to Domain Maniac. Stupid name but VERY friendly and clueful people who provide fast and excellent support both over the phone and via email. They got the domain assigned to their OpenSRS reseller account, I paid their modest renewal fee ($15 a year), and it was working again within the hour. jc

    --
    "I'd much rather be mistaken as a lesbian by a bigot than be mistaken as a bigot by a lesbian."
  150. Re:Along the same lines - now for a serious answer by buss_error · · Score: 1
    There is very little you can do if you can't get ICANN up off their butt. Since the time line is so short, a legal option may not work for you.

    Now, I am not a lawyer, and I don't even play one on TV, but one option is to get an attorney. Take her/him the paperwork showing you purchased the domain, and write down what's going on. About your only hope is to get a temporary restraining order to ICANN not to allow the sale of the domain name to someone else until this gets sorted out. Depending on your area, expect to pay about $10,000 for the first stage.

    If your domain name isn't worth $10KUSD to you, then use GoDaddy.com to "reserve" the domain. You may not get it, but you'll spend $18USD on it.

    I use GoDaddy and DomainDiscover for my registration needs. GoDaddy support is the BEST, but I use Domain Discover when some fuddyduddy says "How can we trust a company calling itself "GoDaddy?!""

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  151. Going through this now. by FU_Fish · · Score: 1

    I'm going through this right now. My church website has been down for a month while we struggle w/ the jokers who took the money and didn't renew the domain.

  152. Me too by erth64net · · Score: 2, Informative

    I manage 29 domains through JumpDomain, and have encountered the SAME issues. I know someone else who manages about 10 through JumpDomain, encountering the same as well.

  153. SAme problem with joker.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im having the exact same problem with joker.com

  154. REGISTERFLY SUCKS, read why... by potus98 · · Score: 1

    Just so I never forget:

    !!!! NEVER USE REGISTERFLY !!!!
    !!!! NEVER USE REGISTERFLY !!!!
    !!!! NEVER USE REGISTERFLY !!!!
    !!!! NEVER USE REGISTERFLY !!!!

    They are NOT accredited by ICANN! http://www.internic.net/alpha.html

    They do NOT have any phone support!

    They do NOT have any escelation procedures for problems that continue to go unresolved.

    Their servers go down for DAYS at a time!

    My problems with RegisterFly are not isolated incidents or one-time goof-ups. The NUMEROUS and MAJOR problems I have encountered are symptoms of a completely broken operation. I used to work in the hosting arena, so I am VERY familiar with the types of challenges faced by RegisterFly. I tend to be (too) patient since I know what they might be going through; however, their issue handling constitutes gross negligence.

    In my first 3 weeks of using RegisterFly for 6 new domains and 3 hosting packages (mid-range web-starter plan, not the super-cheap personal stuff), I have experienced the following problems:

    1) Webhosting service down for 7 days straight.
    2) DNS service down for 6 days straight.
    3) None of the domains' e-mail services were setup. Rec'd auto-gen error e-mail re: failure to create new e-mail service.
    4) Conflicting answers between live chat support sessions.
    5) Conflicting answers between trouble ticket resolutions.
    6) Trouble tickets being closed with no resolution and being asked to "open another ticket later..."
    7) Buggy account login: I have to login twice anytime I access RFly.
    8) Buggy checkout: Items continued to fall out of my shopping cart.
    9) Buggy checkout: I could not register a domain name AND sign-up for web/mail hosting at the same time (despite being given the option to do so AND despite have done so a few days prior with another domain) I was told to purchase the domain name and come back later to sign-up for web/mail hosting.
    10) The DNS, web, and mail hosting are dis-jointed systems cobbled togeather via clumsy control panels. The user interface issues are horrible.
    11) Absolutely no phone support or any way to contact a real person.
    12) Non-English support peoples are making difficult my chances of understanding the why problems of the issues not being fixing.
    13) RegisterFly and Unified names is not even listed as an accredited registrar by ICANN! http://www.internic.net/alpha.html (MY fault for not checking this sooner.)

    Support conversations go like this:

    ME: My problem is blah blah...
    RF: First of all, your settings are all wrong. They're still default values.
    ME: I know, but I can't access the control panel to make the necessary changes. I was told last week that...
    RF: Your settings have been corrected, please wait 24 to 72 hours for the change to be active.
    ME: That's what I was told last week, but the problem still...
    RF: Sir, please wait 24 to 72 hours and try again.
    ME: But what if it doesn't work?
    RF: Please open a support ticket.
    ME: But they close the tickets without fixing the problem and ask me to re-open another one later.
    RF: Sir, please wait 24 to 72 hours and try again.
    ME: [I stop typing and just watch the chat window]
    RF: Sir, please wait 24 to 72 hours and try again.
    RF: Sir, please wait 24 to 72 hours and try again.
    RF: Sir, please wait 24 to 72 hours and try again.
    RF: Sir, please wait 24 to 72 hours and try again.

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
  155. Re:The Three Point Plan by krog · · Score: 1

    I am another dissatisfied Jumpdomain customer. their turnaround time for support was, in my case, 2 weeks. at one point I had opened over fifty support tickets because fuck that place. I lost my domain and it got poached by a cybersquatter called Domain Contender. (more like Domain Cocktaster am I right!)

  156. Re:The Three Point Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, you all can just shut the fuck up now. We got the joke the first million times. Thanks.

  157. Re:Registrar vs Registrar; how about restricing by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Re: squatting. I agree that you should squat on a domain (though you might sometimes need more than 30 days to use it, the courts shouldn't have too much difficulty seeing though this in those cases.

    What about non-squatters who get a large offer. My company used example.com as one domain years ago, and gradually quit using it as that side of the business was dropped. We still own it for the few customers left. Recently some new company made a large offer for that domain, something we can't refuse. After all we aren't using it much, and we need the money. Are we in the rights to now ask everyone (some of which have been around for a while) who might be interested in our domain if they want to beat that offer?

    This is a real situation. I generally like the idea of offering it to everyone, not just this new guy (who I don't know if I can trust). I like the idea of getting a profit from the sale, and the domain is worth more than $100/year to us, so it isn't worth giving up just because we don't use it much.

    So what are the ethics of this situation? Should I be mad at the CEO for not refusing the offer outright? Should he have sold it without asking anyone else if they want to bid? (Giving up the domain is not an option, we don't use it much, but it is work more than the registration fees to keep it)

  158. Reading all these replies... by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think almost everyone is assuming that the Registrar is actively ignoring support requests.

    I have a second opinion: I bet the company has long since dried up and blown away, and that all that's left is a bunch of servers running in some ISP's rack, unattended and unnoticed.

    When something happens to destroy a physical company (death, illness, corruption, whatever) you usually figure it out quickly - the shop isn't open, the paper isn't being picked up, whatever.

    If an internet business suddenly folds - how long before someone actually realizes what happened?

  159. The webhosts are just as bad by randomtimes · · Score: 1

    I've found that certain hosts can be just as bad. For example I took over a website that was hosted with Web-Mania and the previous owner had registered the domain through them and I've been trying to transfer the domain for a number of weeks now. They never respond to the transfer requests and they refuse to reply to my e-mails asking them to. Even the previous owner gets ignored. So now the domain will expire and I risk losing it. That's why I always make sure I own my domains, because that seems to happen a lot. Are they really that sore about losing customers?

  160. Problems with TUCOWS by uomolinux · · Score: 1

    Last month, Tuccows put my domain ON HOLD for whatever reason. I sent then 2 e-mail, phoned at their office in Toronto twice without someone answering the phone! It took them 2 weeks before fixing it!!! A technical error that took 2 long weeks to repair. I just got the impression that they do not care about their customer problems. I never got a excuse.

  161. call alice's registry by wessorh · · Score: 1

    call alice's registry and ask for Rick Wesson. I was the CTO of the registrars constituency in icann for a few years. I know most registrars and can help you get your domain back. Alice's is the most expensive registrar at $29 per year they are not big but can usually help folks navigate the dark waters of icann and the dns registrars. I'll be out most of thursday but will get back with you.

  162. Re:Registrar vs Registrar; how about restricing by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    A big "OOPS" on my part. You reminded me of that which I forgot to include, as I was "on a roll" or "on a 'mission'"...

    It is perfectly fine to me that once you coin or buy a name of a domain that some not in the registrar business is selling to you, you sell it when it is convenient or necessary. And, you should be able to take whatever the name fetches for you. As a benefit, it, as you indicate, makes administering your domains easier once you've disposed of them.

    But, the loss of a domain name should not be a power of the registrars at all, unless the factually erroneously provided or reserved or assigned the name when someone else parked or reserved or is using it. Courts should never take it away or mandate its loss except when a case fraud, drug-dealing, child porn, id-theft or some other illegal activity warrants the seizure of the name.

    Thanks, tho, for catching that.

    And, as I mentioned earlier, if you can legitimately administer or manager or operate multiple, productive, functioning domains, more power to you. My main beef is when registrars park and give away a name on the basis of it being, in their eyes (for profit motive, I'm sure) "abandoned".

    People just need to be more creative and work around taken names in a non-infringing way, such as capturing the essence of their activity. IF the company's mission changes so frequently that they need a nebulous site name, then they probably have some schizoid or identity crisis issues with their board, marketing or engineering team. Too bad marketing "buzz word" craze lets degreed people off the hook too easily.

    David Syes

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  163. Re:Elevation by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

    Here's the website:
    http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/

    And a torrent for the download:
    http://opensource.arc.nasa.gov/torrents/metainfo.t orrent

    -If

    --
    Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
  164. Me moron by EvanED · · Score: 1

    Aparently beau is only in reference to a guy. Okay...

    *slinks into a corner*

  165. Re:CSI: Mommy's Basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you must have known the mods would smack that post down... (with one hand,but smacked down nontheless)

  166. Yeah... by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    ... but did you get your refund? Or an explanation of what happened in the first place?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Yeah... by Mousit · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't get either of those. I guess I half-win, then. :P The domains were much more important to me than the relatively small amount of money I lost, though. For me this is still a good outcome.

  167. Ahhh... reminds me so much of ARIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The American Registery of Internet Numbers has a guy that has been dead for over a decade listed as our contact. It is not like they haven't been informed of this and the correct contact. They just won't honor the request to change it regardless of which template is used to request the change. They won't change it regardless of how many times the request is submitted. And they won't change it regardless of how long we wait after submitting the change.

    Eventually, they got sick of us resubmitting the request and a live person called to notify us that the wrong template was used. It made for an interesting conversation...

    ARIN: You used the wrong template, that is why it isn't getting processed.

    Us: We used EVERY template because ARIN won't make the change regardless of what template is used.

    ARIN: Well, if you submit it on the correct template and only the correct template then we will process it.

    Us: We tried that. BECAUSE that didn't work is the reason we are resubmitting on every template.

    ARIN: Just give it time after submitting it.

    Us: How long do you recommend waiting?

    ARIN: Like two weeks.

    Us: So, after six months it should be done.

    ARIN: We will definately have it done withen six months if submitted on the correct template XXX.

    Us: Great. Why isn't it already done? We submitted template XXX six months ago.

    ARIN: I will have to look into that. If it hasn't been done then you should have resubmitted it.

    Us: We have, about a dozen times since then.

    ARIN: Alright, I will look into it and get back to you.

    Would you believe that he has never actually gotten back to us?

    1. Re:Ahhh... reminds me so much of ARIN by psykocrime · · Score: 1

      Would you believe that he has never actually gotten back to us?

      I would have been much more surprised if you'd said that he did get back in touch.

      --
      // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  168. Re:Blue Springs Info by Dmala · · Score: 1

    I'm picturing two /.ers dressed like Vincent and Jules from Pulp Fiction pulling up to the office...

    "E-mail, motherfucker! DO - YOU - READ - IT????"

  169. ummm....Grow some backbone. by Stonewolf57 · · Score: 1

    You filled out trouble tickets and they never responded? Big surprise. You need to be more aggressive. Call them up, demand to speak to the highest brass you can get at, and either a) work it out if they're willing (then get a new registrar cause this one sounds like crap) b) despite your earlier reluctance to the idea GET A LAWYER. It's your money man, fight for it. You paid for the their services, and they're screwing you over, so take their sorry asses to court and run them off your block. Nevermind the cost it'll take to hire a lawyer. You've got a real legitimate claim here, that they can't dodge. Either settle for cash (and find a new registrar) or beat them in court and ask that they rectify the problem and pay your legal bills. It's just like in high school, you gotta stand up for yourself or people are gonna walk the hell all over you.

  170. Re:yea it happens. by shufler · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a company which owned dozens, if not hundreds of domain names which the majority were registered through Network Solutions. Never had a problem (except that you can't register most ccTLDs), and as the gp pointed out, consolidating them into a single account was easy as pie.

    Now, for my own domains, I would never use them as they are expensive compared to other reputable registrars.

  171. Re:Elevation by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Perhaps appropriately considering the topic to hand, I misread that as "I suppose you could walk in and ask the building manager if he/she could take you to the roof and throw [the JumpDomain dude] off" ;)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  172. Lee's Summit Datacenter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were in the Lee's Summit Datacenter of Sprint E|Solutions. They spent some time at Switch & Data, and now host out of their offices in Blue Springs...

    At least that is what a little birdie told me...

  173. You Get what you Pay for... by NatePWIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I laugh when I read horror stories like these, not because I wish this sort of thing to happen to people. But that people never learn. They always want something for nothing or "very cheap". I have been in the web hosting and domain business for 6 years now. I have clients who contact me on a regular basis asking me if we will match so and so's GREAT deal. I always warn them that if it sounds too good to be true chances are it is. I have had quite of few customers leave us only to return back in a month or two because of serious reliability problems or a total lack of service from these companies who appear to have these GREAT deals.

    Bottom line is, do a little research, don't always go for a deal that is the cheapest. Word of mouth is your best bet or actual reviews from current or past customers. We sell domains for $13.00 per year, which seems outrageous compared to some. But you will always get a person responding within 24 hours or less and usually by phone.

    All I can say really is be smart. Watch out for the shysters, there are plenty of them. Remember everyone has got to eat therefore if the deal seems almost too good chances are there is a problem with it.

    Just my two cents.

    --

    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
    www.haidacarver.com
  174. Re:Elevation by symbolic · · Score: 1


    Quite interesting - I had no idea this was available. : )

  175. Do it in the UK then... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... where you have to be on *really* solid ground before you start shouting about defamation or libel.

  176. "I am curious on"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Niiice. Maybe the registrar is just sick of receiving e-mails from people who struggle to write at the second-grade level.

  177. Re:Elevation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes me think of the grunt in "Enemy of the State"

    Techie "He's smart, he never looked up so we didn't get a picture of his face."
    Grunt "You only have a top down view? Isn't that a bit limited?"

  178. Re:The Three Point Plan by tscrum · · Score: 0

    I've had an absolutely horrific experience trying to get a domain away from Technology By Design, LLC., which uses Wild West Domains, which is owned by Go Daddy. Actually, during my struggles I contacted Network Solutions, whom by the way I've never had a problem with, and even they couldn't help me to get it free. I eventually left the domain there. They won the battle, but lost the war.

  179. Multiple complaints by phorm · · Score: 1

    But when an individual customer files multiple complaints, and then several other customers do the same... perhaps ICANN would look at putting the screws to said shitty registrar

  180. Lee's Summit is full of data centers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually, Lee's Summit is full of big data centers. Sprint PCS has two very large facilities (== several rooms the size of football fields full of cages and racks) hidden just off the highway in unmarked brick buildings. PCS used to provide hosting services until a couple of years ago when they kicked everyone out. Cerner also runs their disaster recovery data center from Lee's Summit -- that's the data center where they keep hot backups of customer data centers from around the world. Those are the ones I've toured myself. I know there are more.

    The whole idea of not advertising the location of a big data center makes a lot of sense. If people don't know where it is, they can't break into it or bomb it. With the kind of dollars represented by those facilities, both in equipment and business, those kinds of concerns are justified.

  181. My 2c by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    Heres a peice of advice - dont use resellers. Always register directly with an ICANN-accredited registrar. How to know? Either register a throwaway (.com) domain through them, or find some other (.com) domain that is regsitered through them, and then check its whois. Make sure that the whois server that the central .com whois redirects to corrosponds with the name of the company you are considering registering with. (Eg, if the company is 'jumpdomains', but the whois is 'opensrs' or 'enom', then theres your answer).

    Also, if you find yourself in a case where you've already gone through a reseller, remember that you can always contact the actual ICANN-accredited entity that they 'resell' for, make it clear to them that their reseller is holding your domain hostage, and ask that they take action. They may contact their reseller on your behalf (and often they have the 'real' contact info for them, even if all you have is a voicemail number), and/or if they cant get a useful response out of them, then can intervene on your behalf (usually by moving it to a more responsive one of their resellers)

  182. SCOTT ISON'S ADDRESS by lorcha · · Score: 3, Informative

    SCOTT A ISON (Born Sep 1973)
    400 JOY CT
    BLUE SPRINGS, MO 64014-3980

    I was also able to turn up another phone number for him: (816) 228-1998. No idea if it works, though. A reverse directory lookup shows that that number is for Jump Domain, LLC.

    Dear Scott: This info was retrieved from the public records. Your privacy was not violated in any way shape or form. Have a nice day.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  183. You can't force a friendship by toonworld · · Score: 1

    Dude,

    So she's an ex-girlfriend. It happens. Maybe at one point you didn't want to completely let go of of what you HAD with her.

    So keeping the domain and administering the contents for her would naturally require communications (direct or indirect) to be maintained.

    If she did right away threaten to stick the lawyers on you, do you really want that kind of a person in your life? If she acted like a bitch with you, don't give her the domain. Instead you can CANCEL the damn thing.

    That way, she can't get at you with a lawsuit. How can she get something from you if you don't have it anymore? And as you said, it was a vanity thing. No business related content...

    So cancelling the domain name and removing its contents will satisfy both parties. You don't actually give her control of the site/domain for free (since she was a bitch) and she can register her own domain later if she so wishes.

    That way, you continue with your life and so does she. Trust me, it's better to go own a different path than to stay on the one you are own. Sounds to bitter to me... you're better off.

    --
    It's not the destination that matters, but rather the journey.
  184. Grr! Bad use of quotes. by Nimey · · Score: 1
    it really means "nothing"
    Quotes are not used to indicate emphasis. Use italics, or boldface, or even underlining if you must, but never ever quotes.

    Quotes are used to indicate that the thing being quoted is of dubious truth, to convey sarcasm, or to repeat exacly how a source phrased things, among other things.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  185. Domain Graveyards by ToughRat · · Score: 1

    I've had an experience with two registrars, where payments went astray, and in each case the domain mysteriously showed up the next day belonging to outfits in the far east. It appears that when they know you're interested, and you end up not buying, they "ice" the domain, to make sure you don't register it anywhere else. I'm surprised (but not terribly) that this usurpation of domains for business purposes has been allowed to go on. I looked for a place to lodge a complaint: it appears that there is none. My conclusion is that the domain racket is just another business, and some of the people you deal with will be ethical.

  186. I guess... by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    ... personally, if this happened in Australia I would have taken them to the Fair Trading tribunal and demanded a refund. However, I might have some more time than you do (and you don't live in Australia :P).

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  187. Re:The Three Point Plan by sr180 · · Score: 1
    Truth is a 100% defense against charges of slander and libel.

    Not necessarily, depending on your location. For example, New South Wales in Australia (the State that Sydney is located in), the truth is NOT a 100% defense against defamation and slander.

    --
    In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  188. How could you have trusted them in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How could you have trusted them in the first place?

    Look at the following quotes from this page:
    "The ownership of Jump Domain still vests in it's founder."
    and
    "For security reasons, we cannot disclose it's exact address."
    How can you trust someone that doesn't know that difference between "it's" and "its"?
    That's a huge red flag that they probably aren't a very professional organization.
  189. dotregistrar sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to threaten them to get them to unlock a domain name I bought so I could transfer it. The whole process took at least two weeks. Vermin.

  190. You are a Very Bad Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're trying to be helpful, and you're just wasting our time with a non-existent problem -- just to peddle ass.

    Thanks, but no thanks. May the gods of bad karma descend upon you!

  191. Record expires on 23-Jan-2006. by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 0

    Just wait a while...

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.