Slashdot Mirror


Apple The Current Fastest Growing Brand

Will Stewart writes "According to Apple News, in a recently published report, Vivaldi Partners and Forbes magazine showed Apple has increased its brand value by 38 percent in the last four years, largely on the popularity of its iPod digital media device. Vivaldi Partners estimated Apple's overall brand value for 2005 at US$5.3 billion. Google and Blackberry tie for second, while Amazon is in fourth place. The ranking was determined by taking the compound annual growth rate of each brand over a period of the last four years."

252 comments

  1. Pixar also on the list by bsandersen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Also of note is Pixar at number 9. So, Steve Jobs is 2 of the 10.

    -- Scott

    1. Re:Pixar also on the list by croddy · · Score: 1
      steve jobs "is" apple? he "is" pixar?

      take me to your dealer!

    2. Re:Pixar also on the list by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 2, Informative
      steve jobs "is" apple?

      He absolutely is.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    3. Re:Pixar also on the list by pohl · · Score: 5, Informative
      he "is" pixar?

      Yeah, apparently he picked it up for a paltry 10 million dollars in 1986, according to this

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    4. Re:Pixar also on the list by rsborg · · Score: 2, Funny
      Also of note is Pixar at number 9. So, Steve Jobs is 2 of the 10.

      No, you see... Jobs himself is listed as a brand, just he's a bit lower on the list (below #20) :-)

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    5. Re:Pixar also on the list by falkryn · · Score: 1

      "So, Steve Jobs is 2 of the 10."

      you will be assimilated...

    6. Re:Pixar also on the list by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      Or is it 2 of 10.

      Oh no! He's a Borg!

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    7. Re:Pixar also on the list by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      you really should google before you open your mouth. seriously, how hard would it be too google Steve jobs AND Pixar?

      asshole.

      yes, mark me , and this sincere and honest post -1 flame bait, whatever, while original idiot who started this thread, wasted everyone who read it their time, that person remains a 1. wow

  2. Where does Trump fit in? by ARRRLovin · · Score: 3, Funny

    -nt-

    --
    -Randy
    1. Re:Where does Trump fit in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nowhere on this planet.

    2. Re:Where does Trump fit in? by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      Here ??

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    3. Re:Where does Trump fit in? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Bend over. Let's find out.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  3. Blackberry? by -kertrats- · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I understand maybe in business circles, Blackberries might be big. But saying that it's tied with Google, which has become an everyday verb for most even outside of the computer-nerd crowd, is ridiculous.

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    1. Re:Blackberry? by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's measuring the rate of change, not the absolute value of the brand. Toyota is also listed on the table and it's brand value dwarves the others.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:Blackberry? by soupdevil · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not just business, but the entertainment industry, and then into the hip-hop and clubbing culture. #2 may be a bit high, but they are ubiquitous and cool at the same time here in LA, just like iPods, and cool and ubiquitous are tough to pull off simultaneously.

    3. Re:Blackberry? by Jerry+Talton · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, you're just a nitwit!

      The article was ranking brands in terms of rate of growth. If you resort the columns by total brand value, Blackberry is a paltry 19th...far, far behind Google at No. 4.

    4. Re:Blackberry? by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      I imagine an incident with Blackberry and one Paris Hilton earlier this year might be responsible for much of the brand's growth.

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    5. Re:Blackberry? by croddy · · Score: 3, Informative

      paris hilton used a sidekick, not a blackberry.

    6. Re:Blackberry? by jeblucas · · Score: 4, Insightful
      atfk2 said:
      I imagine an incident with Blackberry and one Paris Hilton earlier this year might be responsible for much of the brand's growth.
      croddy replied:
      paris hilton used a sidekick, not a blackberry.
      Looks like that brand has pretty much gotten a hold of atfk2, no?
      --
      blarg.
    7. Re:Blackberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I seem to recall her getting a RIM.

      That's Blackberry, right?

    8. Re:Blackberry? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Presumably it's US growth not worldwide growth.

      Last place I was at they had some people come over from across the pond and they insisted the must use blackberies (we'd been mostly using the SPV with a couple of Treos at that point). We'd never heard of them up to that point.. after working out how much it would cost to implement a dedicated server, integrate it with the exchange server, plus pay for the phones (they were only available on import.. this is a little while ago.. you can get them on standard mobile phone tariffs now I believe) we ditched the idea.

    9. Re:Blackberry? by winkydink · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a zillion others out there with greater brand value than those listed in the article. Coca Cola. Chevrolet. Sony. McDonalds.

      The list was just the top 20 that had the highest rate of growth.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    10. Re:Blackberry? by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      What better motivation to get a blackberry?

    11. Re:Blackberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rim... job?

    12. Re:Blackberry? by kevcol · · Score: 1

      ...outside of the computer-nerd crowd, is ridiculous.

      I am sorry, you have just posted to Slashdot- the proper spelling is "rediculous"

      Thanks for your attention to this matter.

    13. Re:Blackberry? by Stoopid-Guy0 · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's measuring absolute change, not rate of change. Looking at the blurb, from what I understand, it's saying that over the last 4 years, so-and-so company has increased by this much, and so-and-so company has increased by that much. Even if Google is expanding at a faster rate, it hasn't been expanding for 4 years to be able to compete with Apple's absolute change.

    14. Re:Blackberry? by bwintx · · Score: 1

      I am sorry, you have just posted to Slashdot- the proper spelling is "rediculous"
      Thanks for your attention to this matter.


      Similarly, that should be "teh proper spelling."

      --
      Discussion System prefs link: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
    15. Re:Blackberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly, that should be "teh proper spelling."

      "Spelling"? Whats "spelling" supposed to be? Perhaps you meant grammer?

    16. Re:Blackberry? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      When you calculate delta position / delta time, you get the average velocity during that time interval. So it is a rate of change. However, it would be more meaningful to show the rates of change for each year, too. Agreed that google's IPO has almost assuredly spiked its rate in a more short term interval. Still, this is interesting.

    17. Re:Blackberry? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Well it would make sense to report national (Domestic) and international (Global - Domestic) separately, since undiversifiable (market) risk (sum of all uncertainty factors) is fairly constant that way. No worries about weighting market differences for value.

  4. *Blackberry* is #2?! by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Users average a 53-minute-a-day productivity gain, says Research in Motion."

    What the article fails to mention is the 8 hour/week headache that the IT staff gets to deal with. "Productivity gain" is so subjective. :P

    As for Apple being #1, it's not really a surprise to me. The iPod is *everywhere* - and in recent days, so is the Mac mini. OS X has been getting glowing reviews all over the place too.

    Note that it also says they have an 18% "brand owners market capitalization" - maybe someone that speaks Wall Street can explain that one in English?

    1. Re:*Blackberry* is #2?! by wqurg · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are estimating that the brand (IE: Name) is worth 18% of the total value (at least according to Wall Street) of the company.

    2. Re:*Blackberry* is #2?! by harvardslacker · · Score: 1

      As much as I'd like to claim, as an Apple user, that this something about how widespread or well made or whatever Apple products are, the fact is that it's just rate of popularity growth (or whatever those business phrases mean), not any measure of quality.

      I agree that Blackberry shouldn't be so high if the measurement were of what is really productivity-boosting, well engineered, or anything like that. The only people I know who've had Blackberries complain bitterly about them. But the fact is that they're growing in popularity... so maybe in 5 years me saying Blackberries aren't helpful will be like people who argue now that e-mail is just a waste of time.

    3. Re:*Blackberry* is #2?! by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      "just rate of popularity growth"

      Don't underestimate Marketing. It does no good to be the very best if no one knows it. Build the best mousetrap the world has ever seen, leave it in your basement without telling anyone, and nothing happens. Agreed that this has (perhaps) nothing to do with measures of utility, but it has a lot to do with measures of the value of Apple as a company. This is really good news for Apple.

  5. Slashdot by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple: The fasest growing topic on slashdot!

    1. Re:Slashdot by ProfaneBaby · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think Google has the top spot there...

      --
      Video Phone Blogs send video messages straight to the web.
    2. Re:Slashdot by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ohh, although it might be too close to judge, Apple is mentioned so much on Slashdot recently that it's a joke.

      I remember the good old days when it was almost always about Linux and related Linux topics. The good stuff! Not just about the next thing from Some Big Company. And Apple IS a big company.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    3. Re:Slashdot by Princeofcups · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I remember the good old days when it was almost always about Linux and related Linux topics. The
      > good stuff!

      It's News for Nerds, not Pander to Linux Hackers. Mac and Apple successes are big news. They are finally reaching their true geek shaping potential. Deal with it, or submit more interesting Linux articles.

      jfs

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    4. Re:Slashdot by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      News is news , Apple just happen to be on the warpath right now and are in the limelight allot.
      "the good old days" are never as good as you remember .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    5. Re:Slashdot by frohike · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember the good old days when it was almost always about Linux and related Linux topics.

      Good old days? User #561297? :) I remember back when it was more than a place to post company press releases, generate ad revenue for places like Forbes and Cnet, and troll. It's become pretty sad these days.

    6. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's News for Nerds, not Pander to Linux Hackers.

      Yeah, now it's Pander to Trendy-Wannabe Mac Fanbois. Every time Apple farts we get a story about how sweet it smells, with a horde of douche-bags repeating over and over how wonderful their Macs are and how Apple is the greatest company ever, while they masturbate to pictures of Steve Jobs.

      And then we get a nice story about new features in Gnome, or something, and we get 10,000 people moderated at +5 talking about "Why would I want to run Gnome when I could just fuck the super-drive slot in my sexy new Mac Mini?"

      It's not just that 1/3 of the stories on here are about inane Apple news (I can forgive that somewhat, since 90% of the 'news' on here is shit anyway), it's that the other 2/3 of the stories are also populated by people talking about how great Apple is as well. Give it a fucking rest, already!

    7. Re:Slashdot by kevcol · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember back when it was more than a place to.. *snip* ...troll

      Jeez, #32045, I can't even remember back *that* far.

      Sincerely-
      #3467

      (Cue earlier account holding smartass) :-)

    8. Re:Slashdot by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 2, Funny

      generate ad revenue for places like Forbes and Cnet

      You forgot Roland Piquepaille.

      --
      Fuck it
    9. Re:Slashdot by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Wait, I'm confused... How does that tie in to Google?

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    10. Re:Slashdot by coopaq · · Score: 1, Funny

      Grandpa?

    11. Re:Slashdot by croddy · · Score: 1
      Results 1 - 50 of about 467 from slashdot.org for allintitle:apple. (0.70 seconds)

      Results 1 - 50 of about 531 from slashdot.org for allintitle:google. (0.19 seconds)

      google by almost 14%.

    12. Re:Slashdot by Starxxon · · Score: 1

      Results 1 - 50 of about 662 from slashdot.org for allintitle:Mac

      I guess that a few results are from articles about "MAC addresses". Still, many articles have Mac(intosh) in the title without including the term Apple. These would have to be added to the 467 number.

    13. Re:Slashdot by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      One word... Gentoo.

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    14. Re:Slashdot by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Ohh, get a fucking life. I was reading slashdot for years before I finally cracked down and created an account. Don't give me some crap about user ID's because yours is 5 digits.

      Seriously.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    15. Re:Slashdot by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's possible any of us will ever do that.

      DEATH TO ROLAND PIQUEPAILLE!

      /me coughs.

      Sorry. Had something in my throat.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    16. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You relax, cornball... You got served!

    17. Re:Slashdot by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I think that's a parody on the whole Netcraft thing?

      Anyways, the Linux boxes are too busy running the Internet to browse web sites.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    18. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'd say there's an insignificant number of articles dealing with MAC addresses.

      and also you wouldn't want to forget articles that include the word "apple" without mentioning mac.

      this is actually what I get
      Results 1 - 10 of about 663 from slashdot.org for allintitle:Mac. (0.70 seconds)
      Results 1 - 10 of about 710 from slashdot.org for allintitle:Apple. (0.30 seconds)
      Results 1 - 10 of about 272 from slashdot.org for allintitle:iPod. (0.23 seconds)

      Results 1 - 10 of about 575 from slashdot.org for allintitle:google. (0.28 seconds)

      out of these probably 70% of them are overlapping articles, but i was surprised that just the term Mac got more results than the other dude posted.

      furthermore, i don't see there being "google.slashdot.org," but there is an "apple.slashdot.org" subdomain

    19. Re:Slashdot by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Whew!

      Hey, #3467, pfltfltflt!

    20. Re:Slashdot by Androk · · Score: 1

      I remember before that, I've been a hip kewl slashdotter since ummm, before ID's. I just always posted the anonymous craven thing, yeah...

      Androk

  6. Microsoft? by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MS is nowhere on the list.

    --
    "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    1. Re:Microsoft? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      Well, they aren't a rapidly growing company . . .

    2. Re:Microsoft? by bedroll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From TFA: "They began their study by surveying chief marketing officers and consumers, asking them to identify brands they felt were both growing fast and being innovative."

      Microsoft is neither of those.

    3. Re:Microsoft? by Shazow · · Score: 1
      MS is nowhere on the list.

      Wait for the "fastest shrinking" list. :P

      - shazow
    4. Re:Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is about the fastest growing brand. Microsoft is probably one of the most known brands in the world. So naturally the don't gain much with a year.

      Hell, everyone in my family knows who Microsoft is, but none know what or who Apple or Steve Jobs is.

    5. Re:Microsoft? by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      The only good way for a monopoly to expand brand recognition requires first making investments in SETI.

    6. Re:Microsoft? by daviq · · Score: 0

      Did you expect to see them, because if you did you are either stuck inside Gates's office, never hearing of Mac OS 10 or Linux, or you just are misinterpriting quality.

      --
      Go to the w3.org and put Slashdot.org through the validator.
    7. Re:Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That only indicates that you come from a family of morons.

    8. Re:Microsoft? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      but none know what or who Apple or Steve Jobs is.

      I've found that most people know Apple as either the company that makes the iPod, or the company that made really shitty computers back in the 1990's. Though it is true that most non-geeks don't know who Steve Jobs is.

    9. Re:Microsoft? by SCVirus · · Score: 0

      Of cource not... a large company that sells their OS to almost everyone who uses a computer cannot get many more markets.

  7. The real story for IT types by whitehatlurker · · Score: 5, Funny
    Red Bull and Starbucks are 7 and 8 on the list. Where would we be without caffeine?

    Oh right, asleep.

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    1. Re:The real story for IT types by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Red Bull just bought a Formula 1 team. Considering the visibility of that sport, it's not very difficult to see why their brand has skyrocketed.

      --
      -mkb
    2. Re:The real story for IT types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw Red Bull. It's all about Rockstar! It tastes better (sort of), amps you up more than a line of meth, and you get twice as much for the same price. Red Bull is overpriced, undereffective garbage.

    3. Re:The real story for IT types by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      That, and they actually appear to want to sell to their most logical market.

      A friend of mine is just getting into throwing his own parties. And what amps up ravers (legally) more than energy drinks? It just doesn't make sense to throw one without the stuff. Red Bull used to be the one and only choice... ravers, club kids, you name it... the late nite scene used to be totally fueled on Red Bull.

      But they seem to have developed a "hipper than thou" "we're better than out customers" attitude. They do this F1 bullshit, and trendy publicity stunts like the fleugtag, sure. But after he finally tracked down the local distributor, Red Bull actually *refused* to sell to him. Rockstar, on the other hand, *GAVE* him a stack of cases taller than me; in exchange for just a small logo on the party's flyers.

      That, and a Rockstar does juice me more than a Red Bull. Though, I must admit, I do prefer the taste of the latter.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
  8. No Napster, Creative, or iRiver on this list by theurge14 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Only Yahoo, and this report is crediting their new music subscription service for Yahoo's success.

    1. Re:No Napster, Creative, or iRiver on this list by zonker · · Score: 0

      and you are surprised why?

    2. Re:No Napster, Creative, or iRiver on this list by shawb · · Score: 1

      Well, they did indirectly include I-tunes, as it probably did a LOT to contriubute to Apple hitting #1.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    3. Re:No Napster, Creative, or iRiver on this list by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      I'm not really surprised, I'm merely making an observation. If indeed this new digital music market is expanding, why are Apple and Yahoo's competitors not taking off as quickly?

  9. For how long? by AviN456 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I for one say kudos to Steve Jobs, and all of Apple on a job well done. Even though I don't use an Apple at the moment, I am very pleased that Microsoft's biggest competitor is doing well. Perhaps this will strike some fear into the folks over at Microsoft, encouraging them to reduce prices and improve their products. Now it just remains to be seen if Apple can maintain this level of growth.

    --
    - Just because we CAN do a thing, does not mean we SHOULD do that thing.
    1. Re:For how long? by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Some would say that Google is Apple's biggest competitor, but they did OK on the list as well.

    2. Re:For how long? by AviN456 · · Score: 1

      Forgive me if I've missed something, but how is Google a competitor of Apple?

      --
      - Just because we CAN do a thing, does not mean we SHOULD do that thing.
    3. Re:For how long? by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Of course, I meant that Google is sometimes MS's biggest competitor. Not Apple's.

    4. Re:For how long? by AviN456 · · Score: 1

      I do agree that in certain isolated areas (web searching and email for example) Google is Microsoft's biggest competitor. However, seing as how Google does not produce any operating systems or productivity software (yet?), I don't agree that Google is in competition with Microsoft on the same level that Apple is.

      --
      - Just because we CAN do a thing, does not mean we SHOULD do that thing.
    5. Re:For how long? by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Why not? Apple makes most of their money from hardware. Microsoft and Google make most of their money from software and services. Google and Microsoft have both committed vast resources to expanding mindshare on the internet. While Apple may have the best OS competition to Windows right now, Google may deal the ultimate death blow to Windows dominance. Of course I'm speaking of a paradigm shift to internet-based applications, making the underlying OS much less relevant. It's already happening with Google maps (who needs MS Streets & trips) Gmail (who needs outlook express), etc.

    6. Re:For how long? by bedroll · · Score: 1
      Fortune had an excellent interview with Bill Gates about this.

      Really interesting, from the article:
      The most paranoid people at Microsoft even think "Google Office" is inevitable.

    7. Re:For how long? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess I don't know why we care. Yes /. hates MS, but I would hope we hate monopolies more. If MS dies tomorrow and Apple replaces it, we've gained nothing at all, except perhaps a slight loss in open HW.

      Let's not forget when Apple was in charge they were as evil as Microsoft, but more powerful.

      I liked /. better when it was full of hopeless linux zealots, at least I could agree on the ideal.

    8. Re:For how long? by __aajqwr7439 · · Score: 1

      ...paradigm shift...

      Please don't do that again.

      Not only was the phrase so overused as to be now meaningless (or relegated to irony), but networked computers running apps located on a server is hardly a fundamental change in the computing model.

      DN

    9. Re:For how long? by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Words work because people use them enough for meaning to be established. And I would say that Windows becoming irrelevant would be a paradigm shift. I did not say it would be unprecedented.

    10. Re:For how long? by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm not trying to be a troll here but simply honest.

      I used to be a Microsoft fan and I used to believe that they are the #1 software company but they're not the #1 software company in terms of quality and they got where they are today by riding the back of IBM.

      There are some pretty awesome software applications that run on a Microsoft OS but they're not penned by MS. I think Excel is the only MS app that was written by MS.

      If they really wanted to be a good software company, where are the versions for other operating systems? I'm not saying 'Where are the MS Linux apps', but where are the MS apps for Apple, and the MS apps for Linux, and the MS apps for Palm OS, etc...

      The office offering for Apple is pretty pathetic which is why I'm glad that Jobs is develping his own for Apple.

      MS's current OS is piss poor and isn't worth $300.
      We all know the shortcomings that MS has and the fact that 3rd party products are needed for the average user to use it is just lame, lame, lame.

      MS has fantastic resources at their disposal but I fail to see what R&D has produced at a cost of over $1 Billion for the current version of XP.
      Underlying systems are much better than Win95 but not $1 Billion better.

      What the hell are they doing?

      If MS wants to be #1, then produce some software for ALL computers.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    11. Re:For how long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gmail (who needs outlook express)

      While no one needs Outlook Express, I would like to point out that Gmail is webmail, and webmail sucks. Gmail is exceptional webmail, but that just means it sucks less.

    12. Re:For how long? by parboy · · Score: 1

      Hate monopolies? You mean *predatory monopolies* , don't you?

      Now let's think a bit, hmmmmm, who does that remind us of?

      M$ *defines* the category.

      Apple's never been "in charge", and Apple's never done any of the multiple, aggressive, illegal, unethical things M$ is FAMOUS FOR.

      So quit blowing smoke up our backsides, troll.

      If M$ died tomorrow, and Apple replaced it, we'd have a truly innovative monopoly that features a linux- and unix-friendly operating system, with a nicely integrated, standards-based, high-quality media environment, an elegantly productive user interface, all running on top-notch hardware, and all provided by a company that appears eager to strike a decent balance between my property rights as a consumer and those of the media producers.

      In other words, a company that tries hard to play well with others.

      And does this while consistently earning design and engineering awards for both software and hardware, and repeatedly receives top ratings for after-sale support and customer satisfaction.

      And the downside of that would be ....?

      I'd take my chances with that over M$ any day.

    13. Re:For how long? by justMichael · · Score: 1
      ...where are the versions for other operating systems? I'm not saying 'Where are the MS Linux apps', but where are the MS apps for Apple, and the MS apps for Linux, and the MS apps for Palm OS, etc...

      The office offering for Apple is pretty pathetic which is why I'm glad that Jobs is develping his own for Apple.
      I'm not sure if you've used Office for OS X lately, I'm guessing not, but it generaly kicks the stuffing out of Office for Windows. They did manage to get close to Office 2004 Mac when they did Office 2003, but I haven't really spent much time with Office 2003 lately.

      I'm sure somebody will let me know if I'm wrong.
    14. Re:For how long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope i think he hates monopolies as thats what he said.

      "If M$ died tomorrow, and Apple replaced it, we'd have a truly innovative monopoly that features a linux- and unix-friendly operating system, with a nicely integrated, standards-based, high-quality media environment, an elegantly productive user interface, all running on top-notch hardware, and all provided by a company that appears eager to strike a decent balance between my property rights as a consumer and those of the media producers." Proof that marketing truely works. Do you really think that apple wouldnt shake as much money out of the consumers as possible if they had the market standing? Are apple's shareholders somehow have more moral, and dont care as much about profits as MS or any other big company? I dont really think that you understand capatalism. Since when is itunes drm standards based? i sure as hell cant use anything of itms on my mp3 player (not an ipod)

      But at least with my setup, I can choose which graphics card/processor/etc that windows will crash on. And I dont need "daddy" to by me a nice computer for univeristy because i was so high that i cant backup my work correctly.

    15. Re:For how long? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

      Your fallacy is assuming that since a company is evil, that all companies would be equally likely to be just as evil given the opportunity. A function of top management (especially the CEO) is to set the tone. Usually one or two key people *are* the company's "personality". And these do differ.

  10. In other news by Sekio · · Score: 2, Funny

    From MSN News: Microsoft has all the market share, is better and more secure than Linux, BSD and Apple.

    --
    grr im mad
    1. Re:In other news by BobVila · · Score: 1

      Will this lead to kissing girls for Microsoft?

  11. Woo hoo - brand value! by ZipR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What a meaningful stat! I have nothing against Apple, but the whole idea of branding is pretty suspect.

    1. Re:Woo hoo - brand value! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Watch yourself son. We know your kind. You're the kind who thinks painting a VW blue or green doesn't make it a Bugatti or a Bentley.

      Well, we have ways of dealing with you. We call it "marketing."

      Prepare to be assimilated!

      Or if that fails we'll be perfectly happy to just take you out back and beat you senseless with a tire iron.

      KFG

    2. Re:Woo hoo - brand value! by ZipR · · Score: 1

      Marketing, eh? Funny - that's what I do for a living.

  12. Re:Was by e+r+i+k+0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, I don't usually respond to trolls, but if I recall correctly, it was IBM who could not keep up with the volume which Apple demanded of new G5 chips. While I don't believe that Intel will necessarily get everything together by this time next year, you must admit that Intel has much larger production capabilities than IBM, concerning the chips which Apple will most likely use.

    Plus, even if the Intel deal turns out to be a bust - and it might, you never know - there will always be a devout Apple following and they always have the iPod, anyway. Apple has a nice-sized nest egg - they can deal with problems if Intel fails to come through.

  13. This is irony at its best by guardiangod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who would had thought that a 25 something year old brand is the fastest growing brand in the whole world.

    1. Re:This is irony at its best by ccoakley · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up as interesting. Made me think about some others:

      How old was Nintendo before they made the NES? Nobody cared about the company that made playing cards and crappy plastic puzzles, but then ... blammo!

      For that matter, how old was Micro-Soft (or however they used to write it) before Windows (ok, not 25, but still...)? I mean, a company brand based on Solitaire has to mean something.

      And how old was the SCO brand before the current company started suing everyone and making everyone hate them?

      Some brands exist for a while before being important/infamous.

      --
      Network Security: It always comes down to a big guy with a gun.
    2. Re:This is irony at its best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft was not a small player pre-Windows. MS-DOS, for example

    3. Re:This is irony at its best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonononono... remember something called Game-And-Watch? They were made by Nintendo, and they were already big at that time...

    4. Re:This is irony at its best by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

      yes, even some/all of the Apple ][ machines shipped with DOS written my microsoft. i did not know this till relatively recently. crazy considering i have one (and had it back in the day).

      i guess they blew up when they ripped off err... released (?) windows.

    5. Re:This is irony at its best by ccoakley · · Score: 1

      True, but nothing compared to the NES. And then the gameboy was a brand on its own.

      --
      Network Security: It always comes down to a big guy with a gun.
    6. Re:This is irony at its best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All Apple ][ machines that had disk drives shipped with ether Apple DOS or ProDOS, both of which were written by Apple and not by Microsoft (Apple DOS was a Woz creation). Apple did ship Apple ][+ and later computers with Applesoft BASIC, which was written by Microsoft.

    7. Re:This is irony at its best by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Golly gee, at this rate Apple could grow from 1.3 to 1.6 percent market share in only a matter of years! /cynical mac user

    8. Re:This is irony at its best by dangitman · · Score: 1

      That's not irony!

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  14. It's about growth, supposedly by stripmarkup · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the article, the valuation of both brands grew by 36%. Of course BlackBerry is much smaller, but they measure "fastest growth".

    Not very meaningful anyway, since it's not very clear how they come up with the value for the brand or even who qualifies for the survey. E.g. if Joe's Rubber Duckies (tm) grew from $100 to $200, it beats all the above.

    --
    See charts for twitter trends on Trendistic
    1. Re:It's about growth, supposedly by imr · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's not very clear how they come up with the value for the brand or even who qualifies for the survey
      They measure the increase in advertisements of said companies in Forbes.

    2. Re:It's about growth, supposedly by Rob_Warwick · · Score: 1
      According to the article, the valuation of both brands grew by 36%. Of course BlackBerry is much smaller, but they measure "fastest growth".

      It kind of reminds me of high school, where the kids who had grades that went from 5% first term to 45% last term got awards for the best improvement.

    3. Re:It's about growth, supposedly by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Pecentage of people who know about it and asociate it with a quality product they would like to own.

      PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE NERDS HIRE SOMEONE TO DO YOUR MARKETING FTLOG!

    4. Re:It's about growth, supposedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since around the 1980's, companies have started to measure brand equity and include it in financial reports. So, the methods of measurement have been in place for a few decades. But, who knows what specific method was used in this case. (There is a small likelyhood that the data could have been taken straight from the companies' assessments.)

  15. Re:Was by macaulay805 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or talk to AMD or Via instead of just one company.

  16. In other news... by ravenspear · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    M$ was recognized as the current worst brand due to the tendency of indivduals to break out in voilent convulsions and emit green goo from their body cavities upon hearing the name mentioned.

  17. "iPod digital media device" by bcmm · · Score: 1

    WTF does that mean? It looks like legal language.

    We'll all know what you mean if you just say iPod, you know. If you're really worried about Slashdotters not knowing what an iPod is, call it an MP3 player. not a "digital media device".

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:"iPod digital media device" by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      Another user linked to Apple's Trademark List on yet another Apple thread and the terminology was one of the things I noticed.

      Apple's "preferred" generic term appears to be "mobile digital device" however they do say the generic terms listed are only suggestions and others may also be appropriate.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    2. Re:"iPod digital media device" by Toloran · · Score: 1

      One of the reason they are "digital media device" is 1) That is the real name of it (ast the previous reply stated) and 2) Some versions hold things besides mp3s like movies and pictures.

      --
      Speaking is NOT communication
    3. Re:"iPod digital media device" by shmlco · · Score: 1

      As I have a very strong suspicion that the iPod "photo" will, with a software upgrade, be a TV/Movie player, "media device" fits a lot better than a mere MP3 player.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  18. Re:Was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sorry, I don't usually respond to trolls"

    Please stop trolling.

  19. Re:Was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM loves losing PowerPC IP so much that they kicked Apple to the curb and snickered as Apple brought all that IP with them to the new Intel partnership.

    You are a shitty AC. Back to unloading into a sock while grunting to your mother to leave you alone, for you.

  20. Re:Was by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

    They did look at AMD but they do not have the capacity and sometimes have used IBM's FABs for some production runs.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  21. What goes up, must come down... by Harry+Balls · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...and Apple's stock price will come down.
    Why?
    1. iPod inventories are building up
    2. The switch to Intel chips will make corporate and private equipment buyers postpone purchases

    Watch for a missed quarter and/or lowered guidance and/or an earnings pre-announcement.
    Then, if you have Apple shares, watch out below.

    1. Re:What goes up, must come down... by myheroBobHope · · Score: 1

      Hey, Nostradomus... if you look at Apples stock, it's pretty much already coming down. It's at 38 down from 45... And the plunge started when their earnings were GOOD but not GREAT... the stock market is a fickle, fickle mistress...

      --
      http://www.pterrys.com
    2. Re:What goes up, must come down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when does the price of a stock have anything much to do with rational facts about how the business is operating?

    3. Re:What goes up, must come down... by revscat · · Score: 1
      After having dealt with the stock market for over 10 years now, I can say with absolute certainty that the only certainty is that their are idiots who try and say with certainty what is going to happen to a given stock.

      No one knows. I know it's fun to think that we can, and that we have the answers, and that things simply MUST be that way because the reasons are so obvious. But the market regularly makes prognosticators look like utter fools.

      You may be right, you may be wrong, but there is no way for you to know for sure.

  22. Remember "Intel Inside"? by Leomania · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What a lame-ass thing to do, I used to think. Now Intel is more than just a brand, it's a platform; business bought into it, and you'll find there are many corporations that won't even consider AMD-powered equipment. I bet that's changing now, but nevertheless it's amazing the brand recognition a chip company managed to achieve.

    Apple is to me quite the enigma. The company gets far more press and adulation relative to its size than any other company I can think of (not that I'm trying that hard; I'm sure someone will come up with some excellent examples). But its hardware has just about all of the issues that Dell and other PC makers have, be it computers or consumer electronics. Yet the overall feeling about Apple seems to range from more of a warm fuzzy to outright adoration; who else has managed anything even close besides Google?

    - Leo

    --
    You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
    1. Re:Remember "Intel Inside"? by slashflood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because Apple and Google is used by journalists.

    2. Re:Remember "Intel Inside"? by fire5ign · · Score: 1

      its hardware has just about all of the issues that Dell and other PC makers have, be it computers or consumer electronics.

      Sure, there are lots of people mystified about this, given that the same electrons are used in Dells and in Apples. But seriously, the reason why Apple is such a hot brand is because Apple designs "experience", whereas Dell designs "hardware" and Microsoft designs "software". And until Apple's competitors get this distinction, they will continue to come out second best in terms of mind-share.

      In fact, if you look at most of the top ten brands, (Starbucks is another good example), you will see that they have taken a lot of time to get user's experiences just right, and their corporate cultures value "experience design" highly as a core requirement.

    3. Re:Remember "Intel Inside"? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Apple is to me quite the enigma. The company gets far more press and adulation relative to its size than any other company I can think of.

      In many ways Apple's products are less performant speed-wise, but they are more elegant and polished. Think of it in terms of the auto world. People have always been willing to pay more for what they see as a more stylish alternative, especially when they don't have to get out and crank the motor to start it. The fact that they are able to provide these products while having only "the same level of problems as Dell" (something I dispute, but note that in any case Apple's customer support is much better) is why they're seen as the equivalent of a BMW and not an Alfa Romeo. Their style is the reason they're not seen as a Buick.

      More importantly, style is hard to create, but easy to show - and to sell. Apple's ability to create a sense of style consistently gives it a tangible competitive advantage. Remember that Apple almost died when it tried to become another platinum corporate box in the early nineties. They started to forget their core advantages - style, elegance, ease of use, and polish.

      --
      That is all.
    4. Re:Remember "Intel Inside"? by shawb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you ask anybody who rides motorcycles, Harley (another top ten) is all about the experience. The motorcycles they put out are technically inferior in terms of performance and reliability, and arguably in terms of comfort. All this with a higher price tag.

      Funny thing is, Harley makes next to no money per bike. The real money is in... merchandising merchandising merchandising. Seriously... at least in Milwaukee (hometown of Harley and of me) you see harley davidson apparel anywhere you go. The most common design for dog collars? Harley Davidson logo. Talk about selling "experience" rather than your actual product.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    5. Re:Remember "Intel Inside"? by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The fact that they are able to provide these products while having only "the same level of problems as Dell" (something I dispute, but note that in any case Apple's customer support is much better) is why they're seen as the equivalent of a BMW and not an Alfa Romeo."

      Hmmm, well do a google search on "apple class action lawsuits" and see how many results you get involving hardware problems. With Dell you just get sleazy business dealing lawsuits.
      As for the support - your milleage may vary. As a small business customer using the mid level Dell service I get someone showing up at my office within 4 hours of the call. I get nice onsite hardware installation if I need it (as in laptops) or can just have the part dropped off if we want to do the install ourselves. I hear their consumer level support sucks however.
      Now Apple wants me to bring my computer into their store for diagnosis because they don't trust our own evaluations. They don't do onsite as far as I can tell (we buy Apple Care on all our Macs). Turnaround is MUCH slower for repairs.
      For a standard business computer I sure don't need a BMW, I need something fairly reliable that has good support and sells at a low cost.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  23. What about hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Interestingly, aside from Apple and Blackberry, no other computer hardware companies crack the top twenty brand value list(unless you count Samsung, but let's not), while five software-based companies, Google, Yahoo, Amazon, Pixar, and Ebay, are in the top ten.

    What to do, then, if you are, say, the CMO of Dell computer? One idea would be to see what the top brands have in common. One notices that the two hardware companies mentioned have names that bring to mind round things, Apples and Blackberries.

    Note also the popularity of double o's, Yahoo and Google both in the top 10.

    Finally, we need a concept strongly associated with partying, bling bling, and sex, seeing as brands like Red Bull, Coach, and Victoria's Secret have done so well.

    I therefore propose that Dell change its name to "Boobies! Computers". Yes, yes, you're welcome. No charge guys.

    1. Re:What about hardware? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      What to do, then, if you are, say, the CMO of Dell computer?

      Dell has a Chief Medical Officer?

    2. Re:What about hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an alternate: Hooters Puters.

    3. Re:What about hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dude, you're getting Boobies!

    4. Re:What about hardware? by bwintx · · Score: 1

      Dell has a Chief Medical Officer?

      Dammit, Jim, I'm a surgeon, not a computer manufacturer.

      --
      Discussion System prefs link: http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm
  24. I can believe it by udderly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know that it's due to the iPod, but lately I've been fielding a lot of questions from customers (even business customers) and other non-tech folks about Macs. Most are considering, for the first time, buying one. It's kind of a hunch but I think that they're moving beyond their usual market demographics.

    I don't have one, but it will probably be the next computer I buy.

    1. Re:I can believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't have one, but it will probably be the next computer I buy."

      Yep, nothing like wasting money on a platform that has just been EOLed by the company that makes them...

    2. Re:I can believe it by wass · · Score: 1
      Uhhh, they didn't EOL the platform, OS X is the platform and it's the company's future. They're changing the processor, but to the end user on the OS X platform that change shouldn't be noticeable. That's the entire reason they pushed developers to use Cocoa and XCode, and even Carbon, so changes like this would be of little consequence to the end user.

      The user should only really notice the difference if they plan to do assembly programming, or if there's ancient obscure software that doesn't use Carbon or Cocoa. But for someone switching TO mac that's not very likely at all. Additionally, future apps using cocoa should run just fine on PPC-based macs for quite some time now, due to the standardized interface.

      --

      make world, not war

  25. Huh? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Who makes this stuff up? I've never even heard of Blackberry until today...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Huh? by wbren · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Blackberry Inc. is a multinational conglomerate--with home offices in Southeast Asia--specializing in the growing, harvesting and exporting of blackberries to countries all over the world. The reported $1.4 billion in brand sales reflects the worlds growing appetite for blackberries and foods containing blackberries, such as blackberry pie.

      --
      -William Brendel
    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Who makes this stuff up? I've never even heard of Blackberry until
      > today...

      proof that it's one of the fastest growing brands - many people who've never heard of blackberry before will hear of it today!

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to consider coming out of your parent's basement at least once a year.

  26. Business Model by wbren · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    ...Apple has increased its brand value by 38 percent in the last four years, largely on the popularity of its iPod digital media device...
    While it's nice to see Apple growing in popularity, I am concerned about Apple in general. The growth has been spurred on largely by sales of the iPod. That was fine a year or two ago, but with dozens of competing products introduced each year at significantly lower prices, how long can this growth really last? Won't the market become saturated with lower priced, average quality products?

    Why buy an iPod when you can get a good player for much less money? Just because it's an iPod? Apple's share of the home computer markey is still quite low, and I can see their share of the MP3 player market going in that same direction. Add their shift to Intel into the mix and the situation is really questionable. I'm no business expert, so feel free to correct me.
    --
    -William Brendel
    1. Re:Business Model by timmyf2371 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I was made redundant at the turn of last year and with my redundancy package amongst other things I decided to purchase an inexpensive MP3 player and promptly headed over to Apple's website to purchase a 1GB iPod Shuffle however the insignificant difference in price between the Shuffle and the iPod Mini coupled with the free engraving service prompted me to spend more than I had originally intended.

      Since then I've spent a little (not much) at the iTMS however most of my MP3 collection comes from CDs I have bought and as I don't buy much new music it's ideal for me.

      You might be curious as to why I chose an iPod over something like a Creative player or similar which would have worked with the Napster-to-Go service (I use Napster subscription to listen to music on my workstation). The reason was pure and simple that it was made by Apple and their reputation of things "just working" plus of course it's nice design made it an instant decision and one which I don't regret at all. After installing the iTunes & iPod software it works a treat and does actually "just work".

      With regards to their move to Intel, the recent speculation relating to their "Numbers" trademark, and the fact that Steve Jobs is IMO an astute businessman I've got the sneaky feeling that the processor isn't just a processor switch and is part of a longer term strategy.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    2. Re:Business Model by ztirffritz · · Score: 1

      Despite the flood of "iPod Killers" iPods have continued to increase market share. iTunes has also increased market share despite the flood of music subscription services. I could say that consumers must know something about a good product/service when they see it, but then again, most of them are using Windows, so that argument is worthless. They're just a bunch of Lemmings. At least iPods and iTunes Music Store are the best options.

      --
      Why doesn't anything interesting happen when I have mod points?
    3. Re:Business Model by oahazmatt · · Score: 1
      Why buy an iPod when you can get a good player for much less money? Just because it's an iPod?

      Yes. That's why Scion is not making BMW take the proverbial dump in it's shorts.

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    4. Re:Business Model by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "[...] I'm no business expert [...]"

      Neither am I. But, hey, it's Slashdot.

      The big thing that the iPod does is get Apple back in people's minds as a purchasing choice. Even if people aren't in the market for an iPod, they are hearing reports about this new Mac OS X thing. Without the success of the iPod, the press wouldn't be talking too much about Apple.

      I like to use Sony as an example. Back in the 1970s, the average consumer had never really heard of Sony--except, perhaps, as a "Oh, they make those VCRs that don't work with anybody else." The product that put Sony on the map was the Sony Walkman. It got people to sit up and take notice and now, when Sony does something, people listen.

      Of course, Sony isn't all powerful--if they were, we'd be listening to mini-discs--but the Sony brand gets reporters interested and they will report on things that the company is doing. People have heard good things about Sony and will consider a Sony purchase. Heck, why buy a Sony VAIO when you can buy someone else's PC? But people buy them.

      Apple had a similar problem. Even if Apple did something great, most the computer press went "Ho hum, small market-share, won't run Windows, going out of business, nobody cares." The iPod got people to sit up an take notice of Apple's products. So now when Apple announces something like a new version of Mac OS X, it gets reported. I don't remember the press caring that much about Mac OS 9 when it shipped.

      "Why buy an iPod when you can get a good player for much less money? Just because it's an iPod? Apple's share of the home computer market is still quite low, and I can see their share of the MP3 player market going in that same direction."

      I'll be the first to admit, part of the reason people buy iPods is that they want an iPod--not an iRiver ZQX-379. They hear good things about iPods, so they buy them. This will change at some point in the future, but it won't be for a few years yet. Remember that Apple has sold something like 15 million iPods--and they've sold the most! So the market has plenty of room to grow. Once I see figures like a hundred million MP3 players sold, I'll start getting concerned about it.

      Also, by the time that the iPod loses it's crown as the top selling MP3 player, Apple may have something else new and exciting to take up the slack. And the fact that it comes from Apple will actually be a good thing in many consumers minds.

    5. Re:Business Model by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yep. Apple's selling the most popular and cheapest computer they've ever made, they've got the most popular music player and music download service, and the OS that everybody seems to think they want.

      And they're still beleaguered.

      Whatever, man.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >Why buy an iPod when you can get a good player for much less money?

      You haven't tried iTunes, haven't you?

    7. Re:Business Model by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      Apple had a similar problem. Even if Apple did something great, most the computer press went "Ho hum, small market-share, won't run Windows, going out of business, nobody cares." The iPod got people to sit up an take notice of Apple's products. So now when Apple announces something like a new version of Mac OS X, it gets reported. I don't remember the press caring that much about Mac OS 9 when it shipped.

      Yeah, but OS9 also sucked. OSX has had almost as much to do with Apple's recent success as the iPod...I know I was always less than pleased with my experiences with pre-OSX Apple systems, and many people I know felt the same.

      I'll be the first to admit, part of the reason people buy iPods is that they want an iPod--not an iRiver ZQX-379.

      Never underestimate the power of a simplified product line. This is a _huge_ part of the appeal of the iPod line. You either get a Shuffle, Mini, or an iPod (I like to forget about the Photo). Then you choose from 2 or 3 sizes. Same with their notebooks, to a large extent. iBook or PowerBook, choose your screen size and optical drive, and that's about it. So instead of saying I got the X.X GHz Latitude Model blah blah with XX meg of ram and the XX meg ATI blah blah blah, you can just say "I got the 12" PowerBook." All they really have to ask after that is "ComboDrive or SuperDrive?"

      This approach is much more customer friendly. Look at the drop-down menus for customizing a Dell laptop sometime. While I'm perfectly comfortable with all these options, they are definitely far from friendly to most users. The Apple method is much simpler. Answer two or three (relatively intuitive) questions, each with at most two or three options.

      That, and they put more effort into design than most of the competition. I've seen guys with Dell DJs (or whatever they call those things...I just know it said Dell on it), and I feel bad for them.

      The Apple brand (and it's growing popularity) is built on these two things. A product line surpassed in it's simplicity only by video game consoles, and better design (both form and function...not only do they look prettier, but are generally more intuitive).

      Hell, I've even grown to like the one-button mouse. It's made me get back together with the keyboard. I've missed her, and she's just as beautiful as I remember. Yeah, it's late and I'm babbling now.

      Granted, it's also really easy to have the fastest growing brand when you have nowhere to go but up.

  27. whole foods #11? by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

    ...and ahead of Nike, Toyota, and Victoria's Secret?

    Apparently they generate $800/ft^2/yr --> 32+ million/yr which means that they expect people within a 20min drive radius to spend $160/person/yr.

    I wonder how much these other companies(that I might not have any interest in) project that I will spend on them per year...

    --
    and now back to the fallout shelter...
    1. Re:whole foods #11? by Foz · · Score: 1

      I'll spend significantly more than $160 at Whole Foods this year. In fact, I'll probably make up for your share pretty quickly too.

    2. Re:whole foods #11? by viva_fourier · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if I can get out of the grocery store under $160/person / month I'm lucky... unfortunately, you've have to work on your neighbor's share for Whole Foods, as I'm not in the 20min drive time region...

      I guess I didn't realize the article ranked these companies solely on 4-year growth -- if you re-sort according to overall sales Whole Foods falls well below Nike,Toyota,VS, which all seem like they're much more established worldwide.

      --
      and now back to the fallout shelter...
  28. Kind of interesting by neurokaotix · · Score: 1

    While Steve Jobs and Warren Buffet were having lunch one day (Steve said he wanted to consult Warren, which usually costs a pretty penny but he said he would be happy to consult for free) and Warren suggested pouring Apple's resources into its iPod product because it would definitely outsell everything else they were offering. Apparently the advice payed off big for Apple.

    --
    "...if people respected copyright more, like you guys do with the GPL so religiously, [the DMCA] wouldn't be necessary."
    1. Re:Kind of interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit.

      Cite your source.

    2. Re:Kind of interesting by ArizonaKid · · Score: 1

      This is crap. Warren Buffet offers advice to CEO's over a free steak at Omaha Steak House. The WSJ did a story a while back. Plus Steve-o Jobs consistently credits Philip W. Schiller, VP Marketing for pushing the iPod. After all Philip created the scroll wheel. So this post is BULLSHIT

      --
      -- The Arizona Kid
    3. Re:Kind of interesting by neurokaotix · · Score: 1

      Cite some sources before you start calling my post bullshit you ass.

      --
      "...if people respected copyright more, like you guys do with the GPL so religiously, [the DMCA] wouldn't be necessary."
    4. Re:Kind of interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Phil Schiller was given some credit for the *click* wheel...as in the current iPod design with the track forward/back buttons under the scroll wheel. (I remember reading this in an interview.) The scroll wheel itself is not a new concept as that type of interface (quadrature encoder in the first iPod) has been a standard UI element in a lot of consumer and pro equipment long before iPod. The mechanical (quadrature) encoder from the fisrt gen iPod was replaced by a touch surface (non moving) in the second gen units and that was replaced by the click wheel on the current gen iPods.

      I actually worked on a prototype media player device (more along the lines of something that goes in a home stereo rack / not a portable device) anyway, we had a UI very much like the iPod with a quadrature encoder to scroll lists of items and the center press to select. This proto never made it to a shipping product but I believe the work did predate the iPod. I choose the scroll wheel with center click to select simply because I had seen/used this type of interface on so many other devices (synthesizer keyboards, pro audio equipment, etc) and knew it would work well based on that experience. I'm sure whoever made that decision at Apple when designing the first gen iPod did so for the exact same reason.

  29. Re:Was by macaulay805 · · Score: 1

    The point I was trying to get accross is the fact they are not locked into one company's product for going the x86 route any longer. Also, who knows, due the Rosetta stuff, they probably may be able to switch from one arch to another in the future freely!!

  30. CRACKberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is the term I hear all the time-- not Blackberry.

    Yo winkydink it should be:
    ...and ITS brand value DWARFS the others.

    sincerely,
    --Word Bitch

    1. Re:CRACKberry by winkydink · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're right. I'm tired. The possessive it holds its 's' close.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  31. way to fill 6 pages... by viva_fourier · · Score: 2, Funny

    Awesome -- if you try and click "Next" to read more of the article, it merely resorts the chart according to the different criteria -- total sales, current worth, etc.

    Nice "article" -- it looks like they pulled it straight from an MS template retrieved from asking Clippy McPaperClip: "How do I keep my forbes.com job this week?"

    --
    and now back to the fallout shelter...
  32. Offtopic? I thought it was funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mods are on crack.

  33. Goes to show your info is off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason iPod stockpile is up is because of a trial deal with Walmart has now gone full scale and they needed to bone up on the players.

    see MarketWatch story here

    The worldwide portable player market is expected to grow even more over the next few years. You can Google for it.

  34. Re:Bill Hicks said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wonder what Bill would have made of the retarded humorless fucks who moderate slashdot?

    "Brand value" is bullshit! MOD PARENT UP

  35. "iPod digital media device?" by katharsis83 · · Score: 1

    "iPod digital media device?" Is that really neccesary?

    How about, "iPod mp3 player?"

    1. Re:"iPod digital media device?" by JackAxe · · Score: 1

      Because it doesn't just play MP3s.

    2. Re:"iPod digital media device?" by eluusive · · Score: 1

      How about iPod then?

    3. Re:"iPod digital media device?" by JackAxe · · Score: 1

      That works. :)

    4. Re:"iPod digital media device?" by Anon.Pedant · · Score: 2, Funny

      I usually describe mine as an "iPod consumer oriented digital media entertainment playback device", to distinguish it from my tape backup and my digital camcorder.

  36. wait 2 years. . . by jafac · · Score: 1

    let's see how fast the brand grows when it takes on all the legacy cruftiness that is Intel's product-line of CPUs.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:wait 2 years. . . by oscarmv · · Score: 1

      Except they don't have to take the cruftiness and I doubt they will. The only old thing in the macs-with-intels will in all likelyhood be the x86 Instruction set. They'll probably dump as much of the rest of the legacy stuff (BIOS, older ports etc.) as they can.

    2. Re:wait 2 years. . . by toddestan · · Score: 1

      let's see how fast the brand grows when it takes on all the legacy cruftiness that is Intel's product-line of CPUs.

      Actually, it will probably have a nice boost at that time. The big question is, how well is Apple going to be able to push their existing PPC line in the meantime, when everyone knows they are already obsolete.

    3. Re:wait 2 years. . . by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Yes, lower price, better performance and lower power consumption will sure hurt the brand. No wait, it won't. Especially since most people don't give a flying shit about what kind of CPU is inside their computer. Yes, the x86 has a yucky ABI, but so fucking what? The real-world performance you can get out of it is what's important, and from what they've shown us they do have it. Hey, IBM not keeping up with x86 was the driving factor for the switch.

      As for the legacy stuff, what legacy stuff? I trust Apple will hide it well, so nobody will notice it unless they REALLY want to. Besides they will most likely go with EM64T right from the start, so a good chunk of legacy can be kept away. They can also use recent stuff like ACPI and SSE2 without worrying about systems not having it, because they all will. That's a major advantage over Windows or Linux or whatever x86-centric OS.

      I for one am more interested than ever in getting a Mac as my next computer.

    4. Re:wait 2 years. . . by nagora · · Score: 1
      Yes, the x86 has a yucky ABI, but so fucking what? The real-world performance you can get out of it is what's important,

      Yes. Intel's real-world performance is shit. The programming model on the x86 family is slow and wasteful, which is why they have to put so much effort (and heat) into making it run like a decent processor.

      AMD are at least making some progress on this, but Intel are way behind at the moment, havig spent almost 30 years living off the back of the same rancid, ancient, crap chip.

      Hey, IBM not keeping up with x86 was the driving factor for the switch.

      Actually, it looks more and more like having to deal with Jobs is why IBM told Apple to find someone else to annoy. The PPC and Cell are both much better chips than Intel produce, as are all the recent AMDs. Not many Intel chips in the next generation consoles, are there?

      I for one am more interested than ever in getting a Mac as my next computer.

      Maybe you'll get the one I was going to buy before Jobs decided that the 70's was the high point in computing. Lucky you.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    5. Re:wait 2 years. . . by D2Deek · · Score: 1

      Not many Intel chips in the next generation consoles, are there?

      That's by Intel's choice. Intel hate having to keep a fab churning out 733MHz Celerons 24/7 just for the Xbox.

      Or do you actually think that PowerPC was Microsoft's first choice for the X360, making backward compatibility that much more difficult?

      No, Intel simply would not make the same mistake again.

    6. Re:wait 2 years. . . by nagora · · Score: 1
      That's by Intel's choice. Intel hate having to keep a fab churning out 733MHz Celerons 24/7 just for the Xbox.

      Yeah, that'd be a chore. Imagine having to keep a plant running to produce obsolete chips that have a standing order. Who wants profits like that, anyway? They just clutter up your bank account.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    7. Re:wait 2 years. . . by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      His point was that keeping an obsolete plant running is probably not profitable.

    8. Re:wait 2 years. . . by nagora · · Score: 1
      His point was that keeping an obsolete plant running is probably not profitable.

      A plant fulfilling orders from your largest customer is never obsolete as long as said customer is paying for the product (which has long since paid off its development costs, so profits are higher), no matter how obsolete its output is.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    9. Re:wait 2 years. . . by D2Deek · · Score: 1

      A plant fulfilling orders from your largest customer is never obsolete as long as [...]

      Guess what? Losing the use of such an absurdly expensive plant in this manner is a net drain on Intel's profitability, relative to that of other fabs.

      When you've got a fab making Pentium 4 wafers and three chips don't spec at 3.6 GHz (but do spec at 3.2), you can and probably will still sell all of them.

      If that very same fab is making 733MHz Celeron wafers, and three of the chips on a wafer don't spec at 733, they are junk and you eat the cost, because no one will buy them. It doesn't matter if it specs lower, because that's not what the customer will buy.

      We're discussing a multi-billion-dollar facility whose sole purpose is to produce $30 chips; and it costs nearly that much to produce them. The very same facility could be producing chips that sell for $1000 or more at retail.

      Intel recognize that it was a bad business decision to provide the CPU for the first Xbox, and will not make that mistake again.

    10. Re:wait 2 years. . . by nagora · · Score: 1
      The very same facility could be producing chips that sell for $1000 or more at retail.

      Not without retooling, which is a large fraction of the cost of a new plant.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  37. dwarfs = dwarves by winkydink · · Score: 1

    according to my dictionary

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:dwarfs = dwarves by brettper · · Score: 3, Informative

      dwarves = plural of dwarf
      dwarfs = verb form of dwarf "to dwarf" -> to make look small

      HTH

    2. Re:dwarfs = dwarves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      To be even more pedantic,

      dwarfs: also plural of dwarf.

      dwarves: not an English word, at least not until Tolkien popularized it (according to his "translation" of The Hobbit).

  38. So what you're saying is by scolby · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple, Google, and Blackberry owe all their success to Red Bull and Starbucks.

  39. The value of hype by Urusai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These are all overhyped niche companies. This is what the US produces nowadays, instead of steel, lumber, food, etc. What a fine foundation for future poverty we've laid.

  40. shipping news by epine · · Score: 1


    Today's "fastest growing" is journalismo for yesterday's bit player.

    Points at dark clouds at the horizon

    Quoyle: Horizon Fills With Dark Clouds?
    Billy: Imminent Storm Threatens Village.
    Quoyle: But what if no storm comes?
    Billy: Village Spared From Deadly Storm.

  41. A Grammar Question by chriswaclawik · · Score: 1
    I am not a grammar Nazi. I just have a question about how headlines have evolved to have different syntax than normal speech. For exmaple, I would say "Apple is the fastest growing company," but the headline is "Apple The Current Fastest Growing Brand." When did it not become standard to include verbs? Also, I've noticed that headlines most often omit the word "and," and use a comma even when a list contains two items.

    Any English teachers or historians know something about this?

    --
    A guy walks into a bar... well, I forgot the joke, but the punchline is that he's an alcoholic.
    1. Re:A Grammar Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually in styleguides of most publications:

      Avoid redundancy, such as: i) omit unnecessary verbs (linking verbs like "be"), ii) replace "and" with a single comma, iii) don't use "a" in headline (at least I seem to recall that in _my_ styleguide...).

      Headlines are designed to be concise and carry the meaning understandable at a quick glance, besides, if you look at the headline you mention as an appositional phrase, rather than a full sentence, then it's grammatically perfectly fine (er... other than missing a comma before "the").

    2. Re:A Grammar Question by The+Journalist · · Score: 1
      It's standard journalism practice (and it's been that way for a _long_ time). In a headline, space is at a premium, so the shortest sentence that still makes sense is preferred.

      However, the headline "Apple The Current Fastest Growing Brand" seems to be torn in two, as it seems to be a whole sentence imitating a headline. A more refined headline would read "Apple Fastest Growing Brand", eliminating "the current" and saving more space.

      "And" is removed for the same reasons, simply because it takes up extra space that can be better utilized with information and _not_ linking additional words.

      Commas are used instead of "and" because they provide the same stopping power with _one_ character.

      On a side note, and a general reflection on journalistic English: it's _different_ from standard English. A good newspaper is devoted to delivering the maximum of truthful, relevant information on any given story. To accomplish this, certain standards are revised and/or eliminated. Thus, headlines sans verbs, a lack of "ands" and a predominance of commas* "run" a newspaper.

      *Note that I lack a second comma. Another journalistic shortcut that conflicts with standard English.

      For further information, consult Bill Walsh's journalism stylebook, Lapsing Into a Comma (sorry about the plug!).

    3. Re:A Grammar Question by chriswaclawik · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I guess there's no arguing with a person named "The Journalist" when it comes to journalism. :)

      --
      A guy walks into a bar... well, I forgot the joke, but the punchline is that he's an alcoholic.
    4. Re:A Grammar Question by DECS · · Score: 1

      Isn't it also considered weak to have a headline with a be verb? A headline is supposed to have a punchy verb to draw your attention to the action going on, not passively state that something "is."

      Newspapers here in SF are really bad, and I see be verbs, or like this article, implied be verbs, all the time. It makes it look like they aren't even trying to be interesting.

      So "Apple picked as," or "Apple named," would at least be an active verb, and something like "Steve Jobs dominates brand list" would suggest something of interest was going on.

      Saying "Apple [is] blah blah" is a easy headline but not very interesting.

  42. I for one... by schmelding · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our Apple-branded overlords.

    There. Someone had to say it.

  43. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ummm... when he got kicked out the first time is when Apple almost went down the shitter. When they took him back, all that he managed to bring to the table is the Ipod and OSX (OSX being basically a descendant of NeXT, which is what Steve was doing while away) Sheesh... why would Apple want to keep a character like that around?

  44. eh? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

    Apple has increased its brand value by 38 percent in the last four years...

    Wow...just wow. I mean, is this news or what? As a Slashdot visitor, I've always been very concerned with things like "Brand Value". So it's great see news like this being put up.

    Seriously, thirty eight percent! Tell all your friends! And when you're working on that code/breadboard/computer case, be sure to keep this valuble nerd knowlege in mind.

    Does Apple just send big bags of money to the Slashdot editors or what?

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  45. Re:Was by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    "Also, who knows, due the Rosetta stuff, they probably may be able to switch from one arch to another in the future freely!!"

    Um... not likely! :)

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  46. and dell!? this is bullcrap! by mike518 · · Score: 0

    everyone knows dell are #1.

    --
    Mike
    I heart the RIAA & MPAA, im sure its mutual...
  47. Re:*sigh* by snuf23 · · Score: 2

    Jobs is a great marketeer and businessman. He will do what he feels is best to grow Apple. He will do it on his terms.
    I'm not completely sure I understand the "cult of Jobs". Watching the keynote was amazing. Being able to present to a room full of Apple developers who have just cleared the transition hurdle to OSX, and dropping the "new transition to Intel" bomb on them and receiving thunderous applause. It was awesome. Having the Intel CEO come out and get thunderous applause was awesome. Having all these PowerPC thumping crowds turn around and embrace the new Intel direction like a flip of the switch - awesome.
    For cross platform developers this is probably ultimately a move that will save them money (and get a few Mac specific devs fired) as it will ease porting. The little Mac only devs will probably be hardest hit. Especially the old timers who are still using Codewarrior and have been coding Mac since it's launch. It represents an additional cost outlay for them, to reach the same market they are already targetting. Wheee!

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  48. Re:*sigh* by ky11x · · Score: 2

    You couldn't be more wrong. The hardest hit folks are the mid-level companies who are having trouble supporting the Mac as it is. These companies often have one engineer and that is their entire "Mac Department." They are the companies for whom it makes the most sense to just drop the Mac version and ask people to dual-boot. The little developers are not in trouble at all. They have a good loyal market (the small mac-specific apps are the reason the platform is so vibrant) and this switch will not represent a hard hit -- if anything, they will force users to buy the apps all over again. Awesome.

  49. serves me right for not useing preview.... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1
    First sentence should read:

    That, and they actually appear to NOT want to sell to their most logical market.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  50. Lack of WMA support on iPod isn't helping by geekee · · Score: 1

    See here. Even libraries can't give you audio books because Apple is the only one that can make DRM files for iPod. Apple's obsession with controlling every aspect of a product will relegate iPod to a niche market one day when real competitors decide to get into the market.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:Lack of WMA support on iPod isn't helping by turvalon · · Score: 0

      From the article you linked:

      The digital books files are based on Microsoft copyright protection software, which automatically expire after 21 days when stored on a computer.

      So basically you are complaining because the library went with the DRM of a competitor of apple. Would you complain if the library went with Apple instead and those who have, for example, the Zen Nomad couldn't get those library books? Your post stinks of troll.

    2. Re:Lack of WMA support on iPod isn't helping by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      By the time Apple loses the audio player market to no-name copycat generics, they'll have moved on already to the next big thing. It's happened over and over again. It's practically their business model.

  51. reminds me of the dot.com bubble by sum.zero · · Score: 1

    it didn't matter if you had a path to profitability or even a working product. all you needed was a powerful brand to rally the vc cash around and you could be an instant millionaire.

    sum.zero

  52. Re:Was by PsychicX · · Score: 1

    As it turns out, IBM never contributed more than 5% of its fab capabilities to Apple G5s. So, it was not that IBM could not keep up, it was that IBM would not keep up. In short, IBM told Apple to go fuck themselves, and Apple left.

  53. It's Not Microsoft by ArizonaKid · · Score: 1

    Honestly. Who else would you want getting brand attention? MS is getting brand attention, but only headlines stating "MS Offers Significant Security Update for June". :) OK Look, Linux is just not able to produce a single compeditor to MS on the desktop platform...yet. So its basically Apple catering to the basic home consumer. And besides...APPLE ROCKS.

    --
    -- The Arizona Kid
  54. imagine... by KillShill · · Score: 1

    how much faster they could grow if they stopped using the hardware lock-in and made things open.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  55. when Apple was in charge by Anon.Pedant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Refresh my memory; when was Apple ever in charge? Even in the heyday of MSDOS, Macs were a small minority of the computer market. And back in the days when Apple IIs roamed the earth, nobody was "in charge" because there was no single dominant platform (though you could make a case for CP/M).

  56. earlier account holding smartass by unity · · Score: 1

    I've been lurking so long, I can't believe I still remembered the password.

    1. Re:earlier account holding smartass by zonker · · Score: 0

      i remember when it was chips n' bits before it was renamed slashdot...

      /me exits the pissing contest...

  57. How many dollars left on the table??? by spaceage · · Score: 1

    Gee, let's see, you have the fastest growing brand on the planet supported by hundreds of retail stores around the planet and a cranking website to sell your products.

    Yet, somehow, amazingly, you don't offer anything outside of your core products with your brand image on it. Not a single pen, shirt, sticker, keychain, pocket knife, poster, clock, golf ball, insert-your-item-here with an Apple logo to be found ANYWHERE. Oh yeah, except at the company store on Apple's campus, where this stuff flies off the shelf. Other skank guys like redlightrunner sell Apple branded stuff for HUNDREDS OF DOLLARS per item from their website because it simply can't be bought anywhere else. Apple has to actively ban these guys from buying too much of the stuff at any one trip to the company store in Cupertino because they will literally buy the store out of anything with an Apple logo on it and sell it for huge dollars.

    How many dollars is Steve leaving on the table every year by not offering this brand on licensed products? Even if you want to overlook the capitalistic nature of the equation, which easily could have resulted in, say, $100-$200 MILLION DOLLARS IN PROFIT over the past ten years to shareholders, how about translating that figure into additional R&D which could have been applied to M$'s backside?

    Is it the something in the Carrots? Could the BOD be this weak?

  58. Story way more interesting that dry Wiki article by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Wikipedia article is factually correct, but pretty dry.

    (all following information from book iCon)

    The Wiki article mentions that Pixar was obtained from Jobs for $10 million. But, what it leaves out is why and how,

    At that time, Lucas was going through his divorce. His wife got a huge settlement, but Lucas didn't have much real money - his money was all tied up in companies he created so he started searching for bits to sell.

    The bit that is Pixar had done some cool things for him but was costing money, so he wanted to sell. Jobs really liked the people there and what they were doing - but Lucas wanted $30m for the company and Jobs was hurting for cash having sunk a lot of money into NeXT at that point.

    So, Jobs talked with Lucas a little about it but backed away, waiting.

    In the meantime, Ross Perot (yes that Perot) came along, negotiating an offer for GM to buy the Pixar bit (not called Pixar at that point) for almost $30M. But they day he was to sign the contract GM cut ties to Perot, ending any negotiating power he had on their behalf and thus scuttling the deal.

    Now Lucas was really hurting. He needed that money really badly. It was at this stage that Jobs stepped in - and that's how he got Pixar for only $10m.

    It wasn't all roses from there though, he put a LOT of money into t hat company before it bore fruit and there are probably few other negotiators that could have dealt with Disney as effectively to bring it away from the brink of extinction, so he really deserves a lot of credit for where he arrived at (though so does Lassider by the sound of things, without whome Disney would not really have had any interest whatsoever).

    One funny coincidence there is that Ross Perot also was the first investor in NeXT! He took a bath on that one.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  59. Re:Story way more interesting that dry Wiki articl by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

    Never apologies to Voltaire. He was a dolt.

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  60. Shut up, faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Subject says it all

  61. Here in Australia by ibentmywookie · · Score: 1

    I have nfi what Blackberry is.. other than some sort of fruit.

    However I strongly recognise Apple (mm fruit.. i mean computers)and Google. For one, I use an Apple ibook G4. And two, I use google probably 5 times a day, and every web browser I use has a search bar specifically for google (Opera, Safari, Firefox, and Konqueror).

    --
    -- The doctor said I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger out of there!
  62. +1 Funny by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    Too bad you posted AC and I already posted to this thread because I'd mod that up =)

    I think the strangest part about the Apple fanboys is that I don't know too many Linux fans, or even Linux freaks, that downright dis Apple PC's or MacOS. I don't hate Macs. I think OSX is pretty neat. I prefer a free and open system, but OSX is definately a step in the right direction.

    Why so many Mac fans are insistant on putting everything else down is beyond me. I thought they were supposed to be the (self proclaimed) open and artistic/smart/etc folks?

    Don't get me wrong, there's a crap load of Mac users that aren't shitty. It's just too bad that the Mac community generally seems hostile because of a few loudmouths.

    Ahh well, it's no use. I like all computer stuff, so I'm probably biased against being biased toward something as silly as an operating system. Shit, I even like my Windows machines. (And no, I don't like Microsoft.)

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:+1 Funny by skahshah · · Score: 1

      I think the strangest part about the Apple fanboys is that I don't know too many Linux fans, or even Linux freaks, that downright dis Apple PC's or MacOS

      We don't live on the same planet.

      A fan is a fan is a fan
      Spreads shit everywhere.

    2. Re:+1 Funny by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      "We don't live on the same planet.

      A fan is a fan is a fan
      Spreads shit everywhere."

      I hope not, then. See, where I come from, Earth, the people here can be a fan of more then one thing. And we can be a fan of one thing and not hate everything else.

      You read too many blogs and forum posts, I think.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  63. Not to sound like a fanboy, but.. by core · · Score: 1

    .. what other brand is there in consumer IT right now? Steve knows how to reach his target market.

    His latest decision, moving to Intel, is nice in the long run but has hurt my sales for a bit, while people were wondering if it was a good idea to buy new PPC software at all. It's back to normal so I guess they figured it is, plus I'll support Intel Mac OSX software for free anyway.

    Best regards,
    Emmanuel

    Cartoon mini golf for MacOS X - http://www.funpause.com/

  64. Re:*sigh* by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

    From what I've heard, you just need to change a compiler option and you're done.

  65. Amazed by Hobadee · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am amazed. Seriously. I walked by the Apple store in my local mall the other day, and saw a ton of hot chicks in there! When was the last time even 1 hot chick was in your local computer store? This may just turn out to be every slashdotter's dream come true!

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  66. Re:Was by lurch_mojoff · · Score: 1

    Oh, right, not due the Rosetta stuff, due the universal binaries.

  67. Actually, you're wrong by bigBlackSabbath · · Score: 1

    Apparently you missed this article [Wired]. This library happens to be down the road from my job, and as youll notice, theyve been doing this for longer than the folks at the NYC Public Library. Id be curious to see which one is actually used more per capita (hint: I think the shuffles are more popular than the protected WMA files for which most people lack the correct player - per capita, of course).

  68. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re:*sigh*

    A little history lesson. Steve Jobs was ousted way before Apple went into its death spiral in 1996. I was there. There were 3 CEOs that presided over Apple during those dark days. They were John Scully, Michael Spindler, and Gil Amelio. It was Steve Jobs that brought the company back and it wasn't with the iPod and OS X. Can u take a guess? Yup, those fruity colored iMac computers. Surely, you've seen one. Shortly after that, the iBook in was intro'd in fruity colors and the first wi-fi implementation. Maybe your ignorance on this era of computing shows your age. Please get informed. Sometimes this place is more like Slash...Doh!

  69. And... by Aldric · · Score: 1

    With Apple starting 500% more lawsuits, Apple's lawyers are also very happy!

  70. Re:Story way more interesting that dry Wiki articl by pohl · · Score: 1
    Never apologies (sic) to Voltaire. He was a dolt.

    Perhaps, but his opinion of religion was spot-on.

    --

    The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  71. you don't SELL "Shwag"... by microcars · · Score: 1
    "Not a single pen, shirt, sticker, keychain, pocket knife, poster, clock, golf ball, insert-your-item-here with an Apple logo to be found ANYWHERE.

    This is promotional stuff that you give away at trade shows.

    Or you make it available in only ONE place (makes it "scarce")....like the Company Store.

    --
    I like microcars
  72. Re:Was by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

    That and Apple users haveing to go to niche shops for parts and repair doesn't help. I just love the look on mac owners faces when they find the inexpensive pc colution is NOT for them..... Off to the Apple store they go... http://www.ctrlaltdel-online.com/?t=archives&date= 2005-06-08

  73. Re:Was by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 1

    It isn't a question of how much of the capacity Apple required, it was how much excess capacity IBM had. Apple only needed 5%, but that was 5% of a resource that is maxed out. Competing for scarce resources is expensive. Intel has excess, so their resources isn't as scarce. Myself, I'm an AMD fanboy. But oh well.

  74. What's a blackberry? by briancnorton · · Score: 1
    Well, I searched #2 and found out what a blackberry is. Their brand has now grown by 0.000001%. I suppose the next step would be for me to actually see somebody using one.

    Although now that I think of it I don't know if I've ever seen anybody use a mac either... :-)

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  75. Re:*sigh* by pomo+monster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Spot on for the most part, but the thing about Steve Jobs is that he has an innate sense of taste. He obsesses about every small detail about his products, from the angles of the bevels on the Apple II case, to the layout of the 128k Mac's motherboard, to the inclusion of authentic fonts (Helvetica instead of Arial, Times instead of Times New Roman) in Mac OS X, to the precise shade of glass in Apple Store storefronts. So while he may be a great marketer and a great businessman--and I know some people who might dispute that last bit, actually--the important thing, and what earns him adulation, is his keen aesthetic sense that's unfortunately so rare in the rest of the industry. The fact that not everybody appreciates these things doesn't hurt the cultishness of his following, either.

    Have you tried the punch yet? It's really good.

  76. Damn whippersnappers! by matty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Get offa my lawn!

  77. Please! by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    Don't Fight! This is Slashdot! Behave like adults.

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  78. aka the "Whole Paycheck" by DECS · · Score: 1

    aka the "Whole Paycheck," as various people around here like to call it

    1. Re:aka the "Whole Paycheck" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's cheaper than the standard supermarkets (Vons, Ralphs) where I live.

  79. Twitter: Life and times of a petulant cock-gobbler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter, you're a petulant cock-gobbling sycophant to Linux Torvaldyos! Quit taking DP from ESR and RMS's feculent cocks and why don't you try to stop sucking quite so much? Get out of your parents' basement and see the real world - maybe then you'll see how pathetic you sound, with your neverending stream of bullshit about how Microsoft is stalking you. Wasn't it you who said that Microsoft believes your insane ranting is actually a threat to them, so they PAY PEOPLE to reply to you on Slashdot? No sir, I don't get any money. I do it for the love. Someone has to go up against your paranoid whining. So get back in your cage and shut the fuck up already.

  80. Re:It's what's not there that's newsworthy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical sycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

    I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or Mepis or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

    If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

    To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. This is an article about email disclaimers. The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx, because "is teh free".

    Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

    Here's that drive-by advocacy and FUD in motion: twitter goes on about some topic and then drops the usual "oh and M$ is teh evil" because "WMP phones home" or some such. Called on his FUD, he then claims that WMP stores every song and movie you've ever played in a file, somewhere. Pressed further, he just sort of slithers out of sight, his FUD-spreading complete. This is not about some Microsoft technology that nobody likes anyway; it's about lying for the sake of lying. Way too many of his posts are exactly like this one.

    More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own. Or these two. Or this one. Or this one.

    Still not convinced? This is what twitter considers "humour" while going about his daily "M$" routine.

  81. Possibly... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Never apologies to Voltaire. He was a dolt.

    I did not know him personally so I'll not comment on weither or not he was a dolt, but he had some humorous comments to build from.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  82. Re:*sigh* by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    Provided you are already coding to Apple's Xcode spec. Almost 25% of the Mac developer base still uses Metroworks Codewarrior and is going to have a lot harder a time.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  83. Re:*sigh* by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I agree with you on this. From the developer community responses I read, most seem to think the change to a single processor family for both Windows and Macs will make application porting easier. My point with the little guys is those that are sitting on aging Metroworks Codewarrior code bases are going to have to do a lot more reworking of their code.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  84. Re:EOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the single most idiotic statement I've read today. Congratulations.

  85. far and away, by circusboy · · Score: 1

    the best was gizo, no contest. But it was waaaaaaaaay undermarketed.

    I think they have renamed it "upshot" now. the real pity is that they used to sell the antidote too, a kava drink. (I have rarely slept better.) but it is no longer on the market... http://www.drinksthatwork.com/

    for a while, when I was working at the circus, vodka redbull was *the* drink, (I think there may have actually been a deal, all the tours got red bull coolers for a bit, don't know details...) but everybody eventually settled on Monster. for both work and play.

    but in my experience, gizo was it. (I won't speak to the comparison to meth, never tried it, but versus any over the counter alternative, nothing came close. period)

    (words of warning.
    1)the fruit flavor is cranberry, despite the orange label. this leads you to think that it tastes like bad orange rather than okay cranberry.
    2) do not even drink decaf coffee if you have one. just trust me on this.
    )

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)