Slashdot Mirror


World's Smallest MP3 Player

Chris_Yates writes "mobiBlu is claiming to produce the world's smallest mp3 player, the DAH-1500 cube. The player is 24x24x24 millimeters (about the size of the tip of your finger or various small items), weighs 18 grams, uses OLED technology, and comes in a variety of colors. The 1GB version is currently selling for $130 at Wal-Mart. Buy one today, so you can lose it within a week!" Update: 07/25 22:56 GMT by T : An anonymous reader points out this review of the device.

448 comments

  1. Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Laebshade · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it really that small?

    1. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is small, but I wouldn't describe as being "fingertip" in size. Sure, it balances on your finger, but I've yet to see a fingertip of those proportions, The Thing's notwithstanding!

      Eric
      See your HTTP headers, live!
    2. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Zediker · · Score: 0

      Well, with it being that small, its only a matter of time untill... iSophagus http://www.sluggy.com/daily.php?date=050622/

      --
      I love to slaughter the english language.
    3. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Chris_Yates · · Score: 1

      Well, it's the size of my dad's fingertip then. :) He has worked in a steel factory all his life, his fingers are like big sausages.

    4. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Formz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People seem to be focused on size, but SHAPE is just as, or even more important. What you you rather carry in your pocket, a SQUARE, or a FLAT RECTANGLE (IE: shuffle, sony thing, etc.)

      Imagine a corner of that stupid thing digging into your leg. No thanks.

    5. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed. 24x24x24mm is roughly an inch cubed. Small, yes, but hardly fingertip size.

    6. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by saider · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd rather stuff a LONG CYLINDRICAL player in my pants.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    7. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Imagine a corner of that stupid thing digging into your leg. No thanks."

      I don't have any legs you insensitive clod. :(

    8. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Washizu · · Score: 5, Funny

      What you you rather carry in your pocket, a SQUARE, or a FLAT RECTANGLE (IE: shuffle, sony thing, etc.)

      You'd be able to fit an infinite number of two dimensional squares and rectangles in your pocket, so it's hardly an issue.

      --
      OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    9. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In order to fit an infinite number of two dimensional squares and rectangles in your pocket, you would need an ifinite amount of time. Therefore it is impossible to fit an infinite number of two dimensional squares/rectangles into your pocket.... unless you could somehow put them in there infinitely fast. But thats kooky talk.

    10. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Daedalus-Ubergeek · · Score: 1
      What you you rather carry in your pocket, a SQUARE


      I believe it's called a CUBE.
    11. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mmmmmmmm. Finger sausage.

    12. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      a SQUARE, or a FLAT RECTANGLE

      I like to carry a LINE or two around with me.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    13. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Daedalus-Ubergeek · · Score: 1

      I don't think this particular MP3 player was made for carrying in your pocket. A lanyard works just fine and probably looks better too.

    14. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Front pocket, or back pocket?

      Uh... never mind.

    15. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is that a long, cylindrical, portable mp3 player in your pocket, or are you just trying to convolute my clichéd sexual innuendos?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    16. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by hattan · · Score: 1

      It's a neat idea, however really impractical. I mean how easy would it be to lose that thing? I for one have a hard enough time remembering where I left my carkeys or cellphone, I don't need to worry about my MP3 player as well.

    17. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      actually I was thinking about these things doubling as earrings that you could actually then plug earphones into...at only 18 grams they don't weigh terribly much (though being a guy without any earrings...I suppose i don't really know how much would be too much weight...lol)

    18. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.. if they conveged to the size of your pocket, it means you can shove them in there all at once with your hand. Stupid humans.

    19. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      You'd be able to fit an infinite number of two dimensional squares and rectangles in your pocket, so it's hardly an issue.

      Yeah, but they'd be wicked sharp! Might want to keep them away from your front pocket.

    20. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by rhesuspieces00 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yet another manufacturer fails to make the distinction between "we can" and "we should."

    21. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by timster · · Score: 1

      A wedge requires three dimensions. Without a wedge shape, how the heck are you going to cut anything?

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    22. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by adamjaskie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah. My company is manufacturing POINT-shaped mp3 players with INFINITE storage capacity. NEVER RUN OUT OF ROOM AGAIN!

      Unfortunately, we seem to have a problem with them being a little bit too... dense. It has caused several mishaps with things such as nearby stars and passing photons, so we like to keep our factories in remote places in the universe while we perfect the process.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    23. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      You COULD keep this mp3 player on your keychain, then you can't lose your keys, due to a sodding great glowing cube chained to them. And since you can't lose your keys, you can't lose your mp3 player... ...or something.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    24. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trying to compensate for something?

    25. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by swv3752 · · Score: 0

      Not only that but it is a square inch. It is way to thick for such a small device. My Creative Muvo is about perfect in that regards. It is small, flat, rounded edges, and not too small. And it uses regular AAA battery, rather than a proprietary LiIon that will need replacement every year.

      The mobiblue device just seems to gadgety and not that useful.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    26. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Introducing the iSingularity ?
      Well ... it is catchy sounding. I'll take one.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    27. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by funkyfreshcoderdude · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be an MP12 playa.

    28. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      Yes, a lanyard works fine... ...until you are driving your car along, minding your own business, with your mp3 cube on a chain under your shirt, when someone cuts you off. You slam on your brakes, the momentum carrying your mp3 cube forward just enough to allow it to rotate a quarter turn, pointing one corner straight at your chest. Unfortunately, you can't stop fast enough to avoid hitting the car in front of you, and your airbag deploys, embedding your mp3 cube in your sternum. The perfect, diamond-shaped scar in the centre of your chest reminds you of the incident for the rest of your life.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    29. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foil covered cucumber that plays MP3's! I'll buy that for a dollar!

    30. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by indigoid · · Score: 1

      bollocks, it's a triangle with four sides!

      --
      P-plate adventurer
    31. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Biomechanical · · Score: 1

      People seem to be focused on size, but SHAPE is just as, or even more important. What you you rather carry in your pocket, a SQUARE, or a FLAT RECTANGLE (IE: shuffle, sony thing, etc.)

      Imagine a corner of that stupid thing digging into your leg. No thanks.

      Well, if you look closely you see it has got that little half-loop sticking out on one side which I presume is for attaching to a ringlet, so you could use it as a key chain attachment or clip it to your belt - like I do with my keys to prevent Pocket Key-Rip Syndrome*.

      An interesting test would be to see how long this player lasts while attached to an active person. Jogging, cycling, running, moving around the office, going out places, and so on, to see how well the circuitry and case holds together.

      Obviously you're not testing for skipping because, I'm guessing, it's using non-volitile (sp?) RAM to hold your music. It's just a test to see how durably the player is put together.

      * All your pants have a relatively small hole in the front pockets from your keys cutting through the liner.

      --
      His name is Robert Paulsen...
    32. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Mishra100 · · Score: 1

      Its not that bad. For a woman with 500 things on their keychain, this would be a great addition. For men, it would be like putting a six sided die in your pocket... Sticks out a little through your pants (unless you are wearing jeans.. they are a little more rugged) but not bad at all. It sure is better then carrying around a big fat Ipod in your pocket.

      And for those who say they would lose it; if it was on your keychain, it would never be lost unless you lost your keys. If you can lose your keys, then you are bound to lose anything.

    33. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Xenoflargactian · · Score: 0

      I want one! I want one!

      mmm...black holey goodness

      How long 'til I can buy one?

    34. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by ChiPHeaD23 · · Score: 1

      What really sucks is that no music seems to come out. Or anything else, for that matter.

    35. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      I've been using one of those for years:

      (Volume of computer with xmms) - (Volume of computer without xmms) = 0 ml
      (Mass of computer with xmms) - (Mass of computer without xmms) = 0 g
      Songs available with internet connection = essentially infinite

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    36. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      If you keep a tape adapter in your car, you could use it like that. Pretty cool for a "look at me" kind of thing. Put your keys in your car, then plug your stereo into your keys. Might be nice for a convenient car mp3 player.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    37. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      The perfect, diamond-shaped scar in the centre of your chest reminds you of the incident for the rest of your life.

      [comic book guy]
      I believe the corner of a cube would leave a tri-angular scar
      [/comic book guy]

      either way, ouch...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    38. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by rollomatto · · Score: 0

      Why doesnt anyone just get over these little players and just make it into some good headphones? I mean who really wants to dangle some little cube or rectangle off like 5 feet of cord when your headphones could be your mp3 player?

    39. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Jonathan+the+Nerd · · Score: 1

      Your link is broken. It should be http://www.sluggy.com/daily.php?date=050622. (And, of course, iSophagus is the first thing I thought of too.)

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are not necessarily my own, as I've not yet had my medication today.
    40. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but where do you plug in your 3 dimensional stereo headphones and usb transfer cable?

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    41. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      The author must have some big ass finger tips.

      More importantly, wtf couldn't they just say "24x24x24mm (about an inch cubed)" to begin with, so everyone could understand.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    42. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "Imagine a corner of that stupid thing digging into your leg. No thanks."

      I played with a prototype of this a few months back. It was quite obvious that it was intended to go around one's neck -- I don't think pocketability was even a concern for the designers, for the reasons you mentioned.

      If you're specifically looking for a player to put in your pocket, you're right -- this isn't the product for you. But it looks pretty darn cool as a pendant.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    43. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Maxite · · Score: 1

      Ermm.. ever heard of a paper cut? The paper isn't forming a wedge, it's just that it's so thin and also rigid that it can cut you if you aren't careful.

      --
      Ah, you found me!
    44. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      [homer]
      D'oh!
      [/homer]

      Well, that leaves a market for a d8 shaped mp3 player, doesn't it?

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    45. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      You could also hang a pair of them from your rear-view mirror, and paint pips on each face of them...

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    46. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by BorgHunter · · Score: 1

      Paper is three-dimensional, though. If nothing exists along that one dimension, how exactly is it going to cut along that dimension?

      --
      "Excuse me, did you say 'Trekker'? The word is 'Trekkie.' I should know; I created them." -- Gene Roddenberry
    47. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      You'd be able to fit an infinite number of two dimensional squares and rectangles in your pocket, so it's hardly an issue.
      Sure. If its too wide you can just roll it up into a line and then fold it into a point.

      Good luck finding it, though.

    48. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      I want my d20 Golf Balls :P
      I found a nice solid bronze d20 recently. damn well dont have 80 bucks to blow on a dice heavy enough to cause a concussion though ;)

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    49. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1
      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    50. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by patio11 · · Score: 1

      Could you please copy and paste this to everyone who asks whether it runs Linux or will work in a Beowolf cluster?

    51. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

      I like to carry a LINE or two..."
      You druggies...

      --
      "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
    52. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth baby, bluetooth.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    53. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by confused.brit · · Score: 1

      Added advantage of, if you're hungry unwrap it and slice it and instant sandwich filling!

      --
      Sigs are for wimps
  2. Alright. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, that thing is just plain fucking cute.

  3. I plan to shoplift their entire stock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and smuggle it out in my colon.

    1. Re:I plan to shoplift their entire stock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, I can shoplift one, two... turns out I can shoplift five of them!

    2. Re:I plan to shoplift their entire stock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...and smuggle it out in my colon.

      - Bob Goatse.

    3. Re:I plan to shoplift their entire stock... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1, Funny

      Bob Goatse goes for the 60GB Photo iPods, surely?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  4. Well... by DanielNS84 · · Score: 1

    My MPIO already fits in my change pocket and performs all the functions I need it to, I'd be more interested in a player that was this size and packed a lot more meory. A matchbook sized player with 6gb of memory would hold all of my songs and I wouldn't be so prone to lose it. ;)

    1. Re:Well... by Iriel · · Score: 1

      That's an idea, or they could just invent a new compression format that could match the diminutive size one of these darling little devices. That would save me space in my pocket and my hard disk!

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
    2. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW, so small, I want one!

      Barbie,
      http://www.vistaarticles.com/

  5. weird... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

    I found this wee thumbnail sized MP3 player... plugged in my own earphones... hit play and heard weird static with the sound of flies buzzing played. Then my cell rang and a weird, detached voice said "Seven days..." and hung up. Any ideas?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:weird... by sdpuppy · · Score: 3, Funny
      7 days?

      Did they mean "7 business days"?

      What if there is a holiday?

      Is the recording copy-protected?

      If not, I'd suggest you make a backup copy, then give it as a present to that boss you don't like...

    2. Re:weird... by kaosrain · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well, just let me take a quick listen...

    3. Re:weird... by VikingBerserker · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's odd. About a week ago I lost my thumbnail sized MP3 player, and I~d&()@#[NO CARRIER]

    4. Re:weird... by kaosrain · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I would die to listen to one of those!

    5. Re:weird... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're safe. The monster would crawl out of the TV, you'd go into your questions about counting weekends, and what about Monday, which was Washington's birthday - does that count? It's not a real holiday after all... and on and on. The monster would just say fuck it and go back into the TV to get away.

      That movie scared the shit out of me, by the way.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    6. Re:weird... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      That was the first "horror movie" to actually scare me in quite some time. As an added bonus, a friend of mine who had already seen the film called me during the credits (which was odd because I was supposed to have watched the earlier showing) and did the "7 days" thing. (of course it would've been spookier if the caller-id had been turned off too...)

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:weird... by darklordyoda · · Score: 1

      Odd, he died holding the shift key down...

    8. Re:weird... by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      If he had died while typing it he wouldn't have bothered to type [NO CARRIER] he would have just said it!

    9. Re:weird... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was dictating!

      Chris Mattern

    10. Re:weird... by themoodykid · · Score: 1

      Haha, that's awesome. Too bad about the caller ID spoiling it.

    11. Re:weird... by stor · · Score: 1

      No Carrieaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargh

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  6. What's the play time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much play time can you get from something so small?

    1. Re:What's the play time? by Asshat+Canada · · Score: 0, Insightful

      How much pocket comfort can you get from something so cubed?

  7. Don't swallow it... by Pxtl · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'll get it stuck in your iSophagus.

    1. Re:Don't swallow it... by paco3791 · · Score: 1

      Glad to see I'm not the only Sluggy freak left on /.

    2. Re:Don't swallow it... by srvivn21 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I belive the official term is Sluggite ...

    3. Re:Don't swallow it... by PylonHead · · Score: 1

      I just wish the strips were as good as they used to be. Last couple of years just haven't been the same.

      --
      # (/.);;
      - : float -> float -> float =
    4. Re:Don't swallow it... by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      thank you! first thing i thought of when i read the headline

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    5. Re:Don't swallow it... by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's gotten any worse, I think that people just shred through the archives, then get disappointed with the plodding pace of waiting for comics day-to-day. Unless, of course, you mean the classic "bikini-suicide" two-guys-goofing-off first strips, but the comic hasn't been like that since its first year.

    6. Re:Don't swallow it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up.

    7. Re:Don't swallow it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the? That page makes no sense. Pictures of Chelsea Clinton in a goofy blue T-shirt? I need to go lie down now.

    8. Re:Don't swallow it... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed the last couple yeras, but the last couple months have sucked. Sluggy without Bun Bun is...boring.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    9. Re:Don't swallow it... by LS · · Score: 1

      You will get hit on a LOT by gay guys if you wear this shirt.... Is he SUPPOSED to be swallowing a giant sperm???

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  8. obligatory sluggy reference... by paco3791 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can you say iSophagus?

  9. Awesome by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

    I can't believe this, it's wonderful! It's gonna become my precious! It's GOT to become my precious...

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
  10. OLED display by taursir · · Score: 1

    The famed OLED display that this device has is deafeningly absent from the pictures. Maybe its so small that I can't see it?

    1. Re:OLED display by JWW · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have to hover over the cryptic arrows in the middle of the page. Apparently they are for the view from the diretion the arrow is pointing. A copule of those pics show the display.

    2. Re:OLED display by jejones · · Score: 1

      Yow. The pics that show the display show a dreadfully low-contrast display of an FM frequency--I hope it's easier to read when looking straight at it. I shudder to contemplate reading "Several Species of Small Furry Animals...and Grooving with a Pict" on it :)

    3. Re:OLED display by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thesourcecc.com (Radioshack canada's new name) has had these for over a month. The contrast is actually killer. Really bright blue, taking up a full side of the cube.

      With that said, in playing aound with it, the sound quality isn't that hot and the battery life blows goats. so it's not without it's faults.

  11. One small problem by ClaraBow · · Score: 2, Informative

    The device uses USB 1.1 which is painfully slow to manage songs IMHO.

    1. Re:One small problem by Norgus · · Score: 2, Informative

      With a 1GB capacity its slow, but not as horrible as using USB 1.1 on a decently sized serious mp3 player.

    2. Re:One small problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      USB 1.1 is the same as USB 2.0. You're thinking of USB 1.0, which IS painfully slow.

      Educate yourself.

    3. Re:One small problem by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Informative

      When you're only uploading a gig, though, it's not a big deal. I had a 10GB USB1 player - THAT was a pain.

    4. Re:One small problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      USB 1.1 is the same as USB 2.0. You're thinking of USB 1.0, which IS painfully slow.

      USB 1.1 == 12 Mbps
      USB 2.0 == 480 Mbps

      So, same thing, in that they are both spelled the same until you get to the number part.

    5. Re:One small problem by rm999 · · Score: 1

      According to http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product _id=3756867
      it uses USB 2.0

      Perhaps there are different models, but I would imagine most people would buy this one from walmart (when it's back in stock).

      Or perhaps Walmart is confused and doesn't know the difference between USB 1 and 2?

    6. Re:One small problem by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1
      Actually, no.

      The 2.0 standard includes the addition of High-Speed transfer, which is what the GP post was referring to.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:One small problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Max. Storage Capacity: 1 GB
      Memory Type: Built-in, Flash
      Expandable Memory: No
      Digital Audio Formats: MP3, WMA, WMA DRM
      Hrs. of Music (approx): 10
      # of Songs (approx): 250(MP3) 500(WMA)
      Data Storage: Yes
      FM Stereo Tuner: Yes
      Voice Recording: Yes
      Interface: USB 2.0
      Battery Type: Built-in Li-Polymer
      Battery Quantity: 1
      Battery Life: 10 hours
      PC Compatible: Yes
      MAC Compatible: Yes
      Headphones: Necklace Earphone

      # Features: MP3, WMA, WMA DRM playback
      # Platform Support: PC and Mac
      # 1 GB flash memory (up to 500 WMA songs)
      # OLED display screen and blue back light color
      # Frequency Response: 20 Hz to 20 kHz
      # Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR): 90 dB
      # Equalizer Modes: Normal, Rock, Jazz, Classic, Live, Custom
      # USB 2.0 ******* (Not USB 1.1 for 1GB Ver.)
      # Audio line-out
      # FM Radio: 50 dB; 87.5 to 108 MHz
      # FM/Voice Recorder
      # Clock and date display
      # Sleep Timer
      # SRS (Sound Retrieval System) WOW 3D Sound Effects
      # Batteries: built-in, rechargeable Lithium-Polymer
      # Dimensions: 0.94" Height x 0.94" Width x 0.94" Depth, Weighs 0.63 oz

    8. Re:One small problem by ClaraBow · · Score: 1

      It's even slower than you think -- look at the specs at the bottom of the page: USB interface Max. 6Mbps

    9. Re:One small problem by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

      its kindof funny, how the wiki article you reference with your curt imperative actually proves you wrong. tho now that you mention it... something here is painfully slow.....

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
    10. Re:One small problem by stanmann · · Score: 1

      USB 2= USB 1.1 and USB 2.0
      USB 1= USB 1.0 and NOT USB 1.1.

      SO while some of the specifications for 2.0 and 1.1 are shared. Max throughput is not one of them.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    11. Re:One small problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its kindof funny, how the wiki article you reference with your curt imperative actually proves you wrong.

      It does not!

      (Err...wait. Don't click on that link just yet. Give me a couple minutes to edit the wiki...)

  12. HELL YES by Danzigism · · Score: 1, Informative
    this thing is pretty damn cool!!! yes its very small.. and it might seem retarded..

    I take TWO things into consideration with my mp3 player choices.. FM Radio Capabilities, and power management.. This has an FM radio tuner (ipod cost $250 and doesnt?? wtf??) and also, the rechargeable Lithium Ion Battery that charges from the USB port is freakin awesome.. this thing couldn't get any better.. but, i'm still scared to spend over $100 on an mp3 player.. i rather use my $60 ILO with FM tuner and recording capabilities.. real nice design though.. i'll get one once they drop in price.. 1gb is a good amount of space too.. anyone who needs more than that, is crazy..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    1. Re:HELL YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you just get a tiny portable radio for less than $20, which will probably last you 15 years, and then get whatever mp3 players you like?

    2. Re:HELL YES by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Tiny? Maybe. It's just under 80% of the volume of an iPod shuffle (and I don't think those things are the smallest 1GB players on the market, are they?) and a really awkward shape. iPods, and most other MP3 players, have supported charging over USB / FireWire for years, so this is hardly new.

      Radio? I remember that - it's what we used in the '80s. Actually, I remember in the '90s we could buy FM radios the size of credit cards - hell a local radio station was handing them out free when I was a kid. Hardly cutting edge technology (not to mention the appalling sound quality of FM radio.

      More than 1GB crazy? My (legal) music collection is around 15GB at the moment. I listen to less than 1GB of it each day - but I don't want to have to choose which 1GB I am going to listen to when I wake up in the morning.

      And if you're really scared to spend over $100 on an MP3 player, maybe you should consider something a little lower-tech. You can pick up MP3 CD players really cheaply now - burn a couple of disks of MP3 and you've got 1.3GB - more than you think you need.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:HELL YES by Danzigism · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ** "Radio? I remember that - it's what we used in the '80s. Actually, I remember in the '90s we could buy FM radios the size of credit cards - hell a local radio station was handing them out free when I was a kid. Hardly cutting edge technology (not to mention the appalling sound quality of FM radio." But the IPOD doesn't have one.. so therefore it lacks something SO simple.. ** "More than 1GB crazy? My (legal) music collection is around 15GB at the moment. I listen to less than 1GB of it each day - but I don't want to have to choose which 1GB I am going to listen to when I wake up in the morning." You carry your ENTIRE music collection with you?? why?? personally, i think its a WASTE of money to spend over $100 on an mp3 player when you can live perfectly comfortable with something cheaper.. Not only can I listen to 5 albums that I put on my mp3 player in a matter of seconds every morning, but I can listen to NPR at important times during my every day commute.. god damn you're all lazy, and you waste money.. punks.. mac fan boys.. ipods suck, and you know it.. all they got going for them is their navigation.. other than that, its like buying one of those HUGE bags of potato chips that you don't really need but you do anyway because you like being fat..

      --
      *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    4. Re:HELL YES by Danzigism · · Score: 1

      um.. because that would be a huge waste of money.. I personally love having an FM tuner built in.. on my one and a half hour commute, i like listening to my music for a good 45 minutes.. then I tune into NPR news.. do you suggest that I carry two portable players around with me at all times?? if its such a simple technology, why doesn't the ipod have it?? to me, it makes the ipod completely worthless without one..

      --
      *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    5. Re:HELL YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waste of money? Why pay an extra $5 or so on every mp3 player you ever buy, when you can buy the feature once for $10?

    6. Re:HELL YES by Biomechanical · · Score: 1

      A few months back I saw in Crazy Clarks these sets of cheap - AU$2 - headphones that had an fm radio inline on the lead, and then a little while later in the same brand they had something similar - AU$3.95 - for various mobile phones but with a microphone and an answer button so you could use it as a hands-free lead as well.

      I can't think of a reason why these would be in Crazy Clarks - a famed cheap-as-shit shop around here in Queensland, along with Silly Solly's and a few other places - and not in places like Best Buy, Radioshack and CompUSA in the USA.

      If you've got an iPod or music player without a radio, and you want the radio, have a look around for these headphones. I'm guessing the earbuds aren't that good, but you could always cut-and-splice on a better pair.

      --
      His name is Robert Paulsen...
  13. Imagine a beowulf... by Shads · · Score: 1

    ... cluster of these things, as a NAS *RAR* lol. I dont know why you'd want a mp3 player that small, interface would be a bitch compared to the slightly larger say, ipod mini.

    --
    Shadus
    1. Re:Imagine a beowulf... by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I dont know why you'd want a mp3 player that small, interface would be a bitch compared to the slightly larger say, ipod mini. You are obviously not a grrrl. Glue a chain and post on it and you got a music earring. In fact, I think it was at WalMart that I saw something just like it.

    2. Re:Imagine a beowulf... by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

      "interface would be a bitch"

      I would like it better than having no screen (*coughipodshufflecough*)
      and it costs less than ipod shuffle with the same ammount of storage space.

      However, I prefer my Rio Carbon (Pearl) because of the space, currently using 4.5+ of the 4.7 GB of space on it

      --
      By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
    3. Re:Imagine a beowulf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glue a chain and post on it and you got a music earring.

      Way ahead of you. :) www.mobiblu.com
      (scroll about 3/4 of the way down.)

      -gko

  14. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's almost too damn small. Where could you keep it while listening? On your neck it would feel ridiculous and you'd lose it in your pocket. You'd need a weighted case to make it reasonable and that'd defeat the whole purpose. Cool, nevertheless.

  15. is it also by arootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny

    powering their web server?

    1. Re:is it also by RaffiRai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not yet, but give those NetBSD boys some time.

  16. And I thought it was a joke by Hi_2k · · Score: 1

    There was a whole story and shirt about swallowing an MP3 player, and now you can!

    --
    When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
    Sluggy Freelance.
  17. Wonderful.. by modi123 · · Score: 1

    I get yelled at for loosing my frigg'n massive universal remote, now I have to worry about my music collection falling into the recesses of my couch?! Arg!

  18. 24mm square = 1" square. by baryon351 · · Score: 5, Funny

    > The player is 24x24x24 milimeters (about the size of the tip of
    > your finger

    Anyone with one inch square fingertips is scary. Seriously. I doubt seeing a 1" cube I could relate it to *ANY* body part.

    1. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.... I got some spam today for a pill that might help you with that ;) ;) ;)

    2. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope 25.4 mm = 1 inch...

    3. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Wow, I'm sure the GP poster thanks you immensely for pointing out that huge oversight on his part...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    4. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by Thenomain · · Score: 1

      > Anyone with one inch square fingertips is scary.

      My thumb is very nearly one inch at its widest, thus solidifying the concept of a "rule of thumb". While my fingertip (thumbtip, whatevah) isn't one inch square, it's still one inch.

      Yes, this is really true.

      As for the rest, I am about as frightening as anyone who likes to listens to Enya. Which ... I admit might be frightening for entirely other reasons.

      --
      This now concludes our broadcast day.
    5. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      I volume only, perhaps an eye-ball.

    6. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 4, Funny

      I doubt seeing a 1" cube I could relate it to *ANY* body part.

      Some guys get all the luck.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    7. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      A human eyeball is *much* larger than a cubic inch.

    8. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Known as an iEye or, colloquially, 'Aye aye' by music pirates.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    9. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by kernelfoobar · · Score: 1

      "...thumb is very nearly one inch at its widest, thus solidifying the concept of a "rule of thumb"."

      Interesting, in french, inch is pouce which is the same as thumb, i.e.:

      <obvious_example>'roues de 19 pouces' is '19 inch wheels' and 'J'ai 2 pouces' is 'I have 2 thumbs' </obvious_example>

      --
      Here we go again!
    10. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      I could relate it to *ANY* body part.

      Now 2".....

    11. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyone with one inch square fingertips is scary. Seriously. I doubt seeing a 1" cube I could relate it to *ANY* body part.

      I can think of one body part, but "about the size of your left testicle" just doesn't have the right ring to it and is too male centric.

    12. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by pthisis · · Score: 1

      My thumb is very nearly one inch at its widest, thus solidifying the concept of a "rule of thumb"

      I think the rule you're referring to is that it's about an inch from the tip of the thumb to the first joint--it's not related to width.

      (presumably you're not referring to the old urban legend about beating wives...)

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    13. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know... imagine having to dig your nose with a finger like that!

    14. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by stor · · Score: 1

      I can think of one body part, but "about the size of your left testicle" just doesn't have the right ring to it and is too male centric.

      You got a bag of dice down there? ;)

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    15. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by laemas · · Score: 1

      The difference is significant, but I am sure the GGP poster wouldnt appreciate it.

    16. Re:24mm square = 1" square. by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I doubt seeing a 1" cube I could relate it to *ANY* body part.

      Your eye has fewer corners but it's about the right size.

      --
      Stop the world; I need to get off.
  19. Fascinating by stanmann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Having a device that small is nice, but my MP3 player is already mostly size limited by UI concerns why would I want anything smaller than a Credit card.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    1. Re:Fascinating by Magnusite · · Score: 1

      Has anybody got a link to a description of the UI? I can't see it (graphic link is broken).

    2. Re:Fascinating by stanmann · · Score: 1

      From what I could see on walmart's web site, it has a 3x5 display. That's characters resolution.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    3. Re:Fascinating by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1
      Well size does matter.
      When I go out eating somewhere, or going for a drink for that matter I always catch myself emptying my pockets to be more comfortable. These days most people are carrying around:
      • a wallet (packet with all sort of required things)
      • Cellphone
      • Keys
      • MP3 player / Ipod / PDA / ...
      • ...
      In my case there're also some battery powered lights for my bike, some pens, misc junk..

      Now, as a male it's totally uncool to wear a purse to carry all your stuff around, I wouldn't mind all of these things fitting in my pockets in a comfortable fashion (so being compacter). Instead of looking silly with a MP3 player hanging around my neck, as my keys on a string around my neck (really, that looks so wrong. Like, you're too retarted to know you put your keys in your pocket) and my cellphone in these totally wrong belt-holster.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  20. now we need a d20 by suso · · Score: 3, Funny

    Call me a geek but one of the first things I thought of when I saw this was being able to roll a 20 sided wireless die w/ speaker and have it say 'HIT!'. It could be hooked up to my character sheet and the DM computer. Throw in that overhead LCD map projector and we're good to go.

    1. Re:now we need a d20 by PHP+Addict · · Score: 2, Funny

      Geek ;)

      --
      Laziness, check. Impatience, check. Hubris, double check!
    2. Re:now we need a d20 by A+shadow+in+the+dark · · Score: 1

      He wouldn't be on /. otherwise...

    3. Re:now we need a d20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [sixties robot voice]Call me a geek but one of the first things I thought of when I saw this was being able to roll a 20 sided wireless die w/ speaker and have it say 'HIT!'. It could be hooked up to my character sheet and the DM computer. Throw in that overhead LCD map projector and we're good to go. [/sixties robot voice]

      [triumph voice]You are a huge nerd![/triumph voice]

    4. Re:now we need a d20 by akozakie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmm... Nice idea. A d20-shaped mp3+ogg (of course!) player with good weight distribution... And preferably wireless headphones... Press a button, then throw - fun way to pick a random song. ;-) Only works for 128MB versions though - larger would store too many songs.

    5. Re:now we need a d20 by lymph · · Score: 1
      You better patent that idea before Jeff Bezos does.

      my drive is hard right now

  21. it's cute by nocomment · · Score: 1

    but blocky. I wonder if to cut down on height they widened it's base. It seems like in your pocket you'd always sort of feel the pressure of it. It looks nice but I'd still rather have a shuffle.

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:it's cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shove your shuffle up yours... Only loosers have one.

    2. Re:it's cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar sentiments on my part too. At 1" in all directions, it'll be somewhat obtrusive in your pocket (fortunately remedied by the tether point for a lanyard.)
      The cube form is mostly gimmicky, but a nicely done one at that. When I saw it a few months ago, my first thought was, "wow, I want one." Very, as Apple might say, lickable.
      However if I recall, (didn't rtfa,) 1 it's not particularly cheap, 2 OSX isn't supported.

      But still very cool.

    3. Re:it's cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it's treated just like any USB mass storage device, why wouldn't OSX support it?

    4. Re:it's cute by generic-man · · Score: 1

      It costs the same amount as an iPod Shuffle. Mac OS X is supported, though you can't use iTunes; you just have to move MP3s or WMAs onto it as if it were any other non-iPod MP3 player. It'll work with any OS that supports USB mass storage devices -- even Linux, believe it or not.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  22. Hmmm... by xor.pt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With a player that small, maybe they could just make one the shape of a hear piece and we could just change the musics with a bluetooth remote.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Pxtl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd like that - just do 2 pieces of equipment - a headphone MP3 player, and a bluetooth wristwatch for control..

    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that a troll?

    3. Re:Hmmm... by pmazer · · Score: 1

      Seems like a great thing for running or biking

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hear piece? Musics?

      Why do I hear Mr Burns when I read your post, and why is it hilarious?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    5. Re:Hmmm... by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      While that idea seems good, I guess the worst downside of it would be that it would only fit in one of your two ears. When I listen to music, I usually prefer listening with both ears.

      Of course, it could still be quite nice with only one hearphone that you plug into the other ear. Having only one cable would probably reduce the number of knits you get on it...

    6. Re:Hmmm... by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 1

      I'd like that - just do 2 pieces of equipment - a headphone MP3 player, and a bluetooth wristwatch for control..

      Both extremely practical and extremely geeky at the same time, oh my god, the universe will implode!

    7. Re:Hmmm... by jred · · Score: 1

      You better patent that shit, and quick :D

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  23. Impractical by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that this may so small as to be impractical... I had a cell phone that was too small in that the buttons were impossible for me to press with my (sausage like) fingers without messing up. I had to get a bigger one.
    I don't mind something that is small enough to be hidden by a sock, but not a match book...
    It does seem like this could create some interesting possibilities for integrated earphones. Perhaps an ear phone that hooks over your ear>
    Anyhow, Like my wife says, anyone who says that size doesn't matter has a small , er, MP3 player

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    1. Re:Impractical by MacUNIX · · Score: 1

      So YOU'RE the one with 1" diameter fingertips, eh? Admit it...you were the hand model for this one.

    2. Re:Impractical by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I had a cell phone that was too small in that the buttons were impossible for me to press with my (sausage like) fingers without messing up.

      Beep-Beep-Beep - The fingers you've used to dial are too fat. To obtain a special dialing wand, please mash the keypad with your palm now...

      - Recorded message in a Simpsons episode when Homer gains too much weight and tries to use the phone.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  24. reminds me of the Dilbert strip by phyruxus · · Score: 1

    Where Dilbert is buying a new computer, and the salesman shows him the desktop, the laptop, and the fingertop (which is glued to your fingernails).

    "Dave, about last night..."

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  25. DashSlotted by I_Strahd · · Score: 1

    Apparently their server is hosted on one of these as well.

  26. Old news by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
    This was mentioned last week in a /. journal:

    http://slashdot.org/~gmhowell/journal/112533

  27. This is not news! by TommyBlack · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How is this news? How can this possibly matter? It's not like someone just invented the mp3 player. Someone made a tiny one. Whoah, stop the presses! Tune in tomorrow when someone makes one .1mm smaller!

    --
    Why do my serious comments get modded "funny"?
  28. Interfacing to (car) FM radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, I'm sure one of you fellow geeks has a great solution as to how to connect this type of thing to a low-power FM transmitter for car listening. So, for those of you who have spent some time trying this out, what was the best solution you found?

    1. Re:Interfacing to (car) FM radio by derrickoswald · · Score: 1

      The previously slashdotted Minty MP3 has an FM transmitter using a MAX260x chip.

  29. It looks pretty awesome. by Stick_Fig · · Score: 2, Funny
    I was just looking at this thing last night. If I wasn't getting hardcore poontang from my iPod, I would be interested in this.

    And hey, since Wal-mart is selling this, I think it might just give the iPod a run for its money.

    --
    ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
  30. For the lazy people... by damionfury · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...here's a link to Wal-Mart's website. They appear to be nearly sold out of the 1 gig ones, though.

    1. Re:For the lazy people... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link for those of us with a conscience who don't shop at Wal-Mart?

    2. Re:For the lazy people... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't buy these things from WalMart. http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient-ff &ie=UTF-8&q=walmart%20sucks

      There are other places to buy from. Pick one that treats its employees better.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:For the lazy people... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I can't imagine why you would have a problem with a company that promotes from within, fosters a spirit of customer service and job satisfaction, and provides stock options at all levels of employment; all while still providing a stable quality of product and low prices.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    4. Re:For the lazy people... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with that kind of company at all. But Walmart isn't that kind of company.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    5. Re:For the lazy people... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Sure. A conscience costs you only $120 plus shipping.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    6. Re:For the lazy people... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Odd, that goes counter to my experience with walmart employees and my research into the company. Perhaps you have some evidence that they don't do what they say they do.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    7. Re:For the lazy people... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Browse around the Google search that I posted in the message that you first replied to. Walmart's bad citizenship is well documented, and frankly, you must live under a rock if you haven't heard about it, or don't know where to find it.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    8. Re:For the lazy people... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I like your way of determining whether something is good or not. Didn't you hear that Slashdot sucks too? What are you doing here? Go home and have some food.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    9. Re:For the lazy people... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      I can prove anything with a google search

      There are crackpots for every cause and complaints without number. I'm not filtering through thousands of crackpots with an anti-walmart agenda.

      I'm not going to quit using paypal or ebay just because of some crackpot's problem either.

      Now if you've got some evidence of malfeasance or documentation of broken promises FINE, frankly I suspect you don't.

      And low prices compared to the local competition and minimum wage pay don't qualify as bad citizenship, neither does one misogynistic manager out of 12000. Frankly I'd be shocked if there weren't minor problems.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    10. Re:For the lazy people... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      It's not my job to educate the ignorant, but I will point out that you like to eat sperm like a crazy cum whore.

      You know, there's quite a lot of people laughing at your ignorance besides me.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    11. Re:For the lazy people... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Like the other guy, you're a cum guzzler. I think you wear it like sunscreen, because it prevent knowlege from getting through your thick skin.

      Just a tip: if you CLICK on the LINKS that the google search provides, you will find stuff to read, and you might actually learn something.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    12. Re:For the lazy people... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are a good troll.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    13. Re:For the lazy people... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Well, for a known troll, I shouldn't be surprised at your ignorance, and lack of linguistic ability. Ah well, typical for a troll no proof or evidence, just obscenity and slander.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    14. Re:For the lazy people... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Now, go back to the google search that I posted before, and read the links. Disagree with them if you want. But don't think that I am under the delusion that I have proved anything. I have not.

      All I did was give a little Google search so that anybody interested could see what people are saying about WalMart. Dig?

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    15. Re:For the lazy people... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      You know what? People who can't handle what I am saying call me a troll. I suppose that's easier than learning something.

      Oops, don't you have to report in for your shitty $5.25 an hour Wal Mart job? Get your smile on and get your ass to work. When I walk in your store, you'd better fucking SMILE and call me SIR.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    16. Re:For the lazy people... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Brother, I shop at Wal-Mart, I eat at McDonald's (rarely), and I watch corporate-owned TV stations. I really don't care what Google searches have to say about companies "sucking."

      --
      For more information, click here.
    17. Re:For the lazy people... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      If you don't care, then why did you even bother to reply to me in the first place?

      A better question here is "who is trolling whom?" Your Troll-Fu is subtle and powerful, it seems.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    18. Re:For the lazy people... by iamnafets · · Score: 1

      Link...slashdot... Now they have asshole.

    19. Re:For the lazy people... by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 1

      There are other places to buy from. Pick one that treats its employees better.

      You mean its associates, right?

      --
      A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
  31. Anyone else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    immediatly start thinking about the iFlea??

  32. Mirrordot by guardiangod · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mirror

    /. in 6 minutes...it must be a new record or something

  33. Not good enough for me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not small enough! We need mp3-playing dust. Now that would be a P2P they would have trouble sorting out!

  34. Server trashed already... by WTBF · · Score: 1

    Coral cache of the site.
    Google cache
    Mirrordot
    Not that anybody round here would be reading the article though.

  35. fingertips by justforaday · · Score: 4, Funny

    The player is 24x24x24 milimeters (about the size of the tip of your finger...

    Sounds like it should be really easy to push the buttons to control the thing...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  36. Check out that battery life by joshdick · · Score: 1

    The battery life of this seems impressive.

    From the specs:

    BATTERY LIFE
    Approximately 17 hours

    PLAY TIME
    16 hours with WMA (64Kbps) or 8 hours with MP3 (128Kbps) per 256MB

  37. milimeter? by Nostrada · · Score: 1

    How difficult is it to hit F7? Or run a spell check?
    Sigh. OOPS, I meant, dificult.

    --
    Cheers, Nostrada
  38. 17 Hours by inotocracy · · Score: 1

    17 Hours, visit the product's website.

    1. Re:17 Hours by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      Bah I hate this 17 hours non-sense. If they would put a decent amplifier in the thing it would last only a couple hours with the room they have for a battery.

    2. Re:17 Hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what type of amplifier does this model have?
      You make no reference to what is bad, what type of amplifier this unit has or what type would be better. Your assumption of poor amplifier and long battery life is based on absolutely NOTHING. Good post.

    3. Re:17 Hours by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      I like having an amplifier that will power the set of headphones I've put in my ski helmet. Thank you!

      I have serious doubts that a mp3 player that big has enough battery to meet my power requirements without an outside amp.

    4. Re:17 Hours by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Somehow I feel an all tube amplifier would not fit in such a small device.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    5. Re:17 Hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know there are different amplifier designs for better quality sound and capable of different power out levels. At first I thought you were refering to sound quality and not power output. I also have no reason to believe this mp3 player supplies no more output power then the average mp3 player but if you are really looking for that extra power, you could save yourself some hassle and look for a device with that capability. I can tell you though, your choice will be limited to a very small subset of available portable players. You seem to be comparing battery life with output power which is not a direct relationship. oddly enough, you need to look at the OUTPUT POWER level spec for output power level.

  39. headphones by some_god · · Score: 1

    while thire building small mp3 players, wouldn't it be better to just build it into a pair of headphones? no cables geting in the way and not as easy to lose.

  40. Tip of one's finger?? by sczimme · · Score: 5, Funny


    The player is 24x24x24 milimeters (about the size of the tip of your finger or various small items)

    I don't know about the rest of the non-gigantism population, but the tips of my fingers are rather smaller than one cubic inch.

    For scale: early in the movie 'Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban', Harry causes his b*tchy aunt to inflate and blow away like a balloon. Her finger was the first part to inflate; when she holds it up, the tip of the finger appears to be about 1" in diameter.

    To sum up: normal finger tips are not 1" in diameter.

    / pulled a muscle reaching for that comparison

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Tip of one's finger?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's the tip of another "finger" the author was referencing

    2. Re:Tip of one's finger?? by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      I was going to comment on this, and similarity to the KFC mini-fillet burger where KFC marketing claimed the person holding their mini-sandwich may have had small hands.

      Look at how meaty that guy's hands are. Obviously you find a model that isn't a twig when demonstrating how small a piece of electronics is. But it does occasionally bite the manufacturer.

      The article doesn't actually say smaller than the tip of a finger, but that's what you think when you see the picture. It probably IS smaller than the tip of a finger, when you measure from the end of middle finger to the first joint.

    3. Re:Tip of one's finger?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, thanks. After everyone like me's trying to avoid spoilers. How about this one? AC kills Evil Adrian!!! (Well, don't some of us wish.)

  41. "loose it in a week" by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    can we mod the posts? this gives me a chuckle before I even get to the comments.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:"loose it in a week" by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      And not just because of the snide "it's too small, it sucks" comment about an mp3 player that's slightly larger than the iPod Shuffle?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  42. Cool, but... by blazerw11 · · Score: 1

    There's always got to be a "Yeah that's neat, but..." post. Here's mine:

    Yeah, that's neat, but when's the firmware update coming that supports Ogg. MP3s are so 2002.

    --
    A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices. -- William James
    1. Re:Cool, but... by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      but when's the firmware update coming that supports Ogg.

      When it stops being cool. They want all the cool kids to use ones first, and after they have sold all that they can to the cool kids, they'll support ogg and go for the smelly, maladjusted, tape-on-the-glasses market.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    2. Re:Cool, but... by sweetshot97 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why every MP3 that comes out has to support Ogg for you dweeb creatues out there.

  43. CUBE! by improfane · · Score: 0

    That is cool. But isn't it too small and too light that you'll lose it!

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
  44. No Wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame. by network23 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No Wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Does it get any bigger? by winkydink · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh wait, wrong site. :)

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Does it get any bigger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me too, I can't wait for the borg-size cube to be carried in its pocket.

  47. Cube? CUBE? by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're going for small form factor, why on earth would you want a cube? Surely the ideal is more of a thin credit-card shape, so that it'll fit conveniently in pockets. Not to mention offering more surface area for sensibly-sized controls.

    I suppose this is marginally more convenient than the "caltrop", "shuriken" and "mousetrap" form factors, but it's a close thing.

    1. Re:Cube? CUBE? by burndive · · Score: 1
      Yeah... well... yeah, but they beat the iPod shuffle by a whopping .22 cubic inches so there!

      Seriously who cares that it's the 'smallest' if it's such a cumbersome shape that it feels like a rock in your pocket.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    2. Re:Cube? CUBE? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Very thin, very wide objects, like a credit card, have a tendency to bend when put in a pocket. This probably isn't the best thing unless it's circuit board is printed on something somewhat flexible. I cube shape I would think would be somewhat more durible although you do have a point about surface area for controls as well as convienence for keeping in your pocket.

    3. Re:Cube? CUBE? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      I've got a calculator that I typically carry everywhere in the credit card form factor that is exactly thick enough to support a headphone jack. My current player is slightly larger than that and is just about as small as can be managed reasonably. The only thing really missing on my current player is a way to keep the jack from ripping out when it falls out of my pocket.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    4. Re:Cube? CUBE? by Ctawp · · Score: 1

      However, perhaps with the exclusion of the "mousetrap" form factor, you can't pass up added functionality. Design + practical secondary uses are wonderful things to have. I wouldn't mind a "caltrop" or "shuriken" form-factor in those harsh situations where one may need to get away from someone chasing you on a horse or fighting off ninjas. =P Sometimes it doesn't hurt not to have a small form factor.

      Next idea for submission: One time defensive use Ninjitsu form-factor, for a smokey escape.

    5. Re:Cube? CUBE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares if its a cube? It's a fucking inch. It will take up less room then your dragon dice.

    6. Re:Cube? CUBE? by vtolturbo · · Score: 1

      ah, the caltrop form factor would be ideal. while the individual prongs would make for excellent buttons in the UI, the unit would have the added benefit of playing a particular sound, activated when your pursuer steps upon it. surely, the sound of "hey, watch it, buddy" accompanied by the immediate debilitating foot pain would provide superior deterrent over either individual effect alone.

      thank you! i've been waiting to use the word caltrop in conversation for weeks, and this is the next best thing. :D

  48. Buy something from Walmart?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather eat glass.

  49. Tip of my finger??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    24mm is just shy of 1". How many people out there have 1"x1"x1" fingertips out there? Besides the frog-people...

  50. Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffle. by argent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1"x1"x1" = 1 cubic inch.

    0.98" x 3.3" x 0.33" = 1.06 cubic inch.

    And the shuffle is easier to fit in your pocket.

  51. How about recommending a different vendor by Pansy · · Score: 1
    Surely there are a hundred less evil vendors to recommend than Wal-Mart.

    Check out Wal-Mart Watch.

    --
    People are the problem, stop procreation now!
    1. Re:How about recommending a different vendor by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Oh no, always chooser the Greater of Evils when you have a chance.

      Shop Smart, Shop Cthulu-Mart.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  52. iPod Shuffle smaller? by TheSwirlingMaelstrom · · Score: 1
    I don't have an iPod shuffle, but from those I have seen, I think that the shuffle is smaller than this when you consider the volume. Also, a 2.4cm cube in your pocket is rather awkward, even if it is only 18g.

    Anyone out there have a ruler and an iPod shuffle to verify this?

    --
    #include "cunning_plan.h"
    1. Re:iPod Shuffle smaller? by randyest · · Score: 3, Informative

      This little cube is more than 20% smaller than an iPod shuffle by volume. (24 mm per side / 25.4 mm/inch)^3=0.84 cubic inches, which is .84/1.06=0.79 times the volume of an ipod shuffle (1.06 cu. in.)

      It also has FM radio, which no ipod does.

      It's also considerably cheaper than an iPod.

      Sorry mods -- this post may appear to disparage the ipod and/or other apple products, but, um, well, ipods rulezorz!!!!111!one

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:iPod Shuffle smaller? by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

      This little cube is more than 20% smaller than an iPod shuffle by volume....It also has FM radio, which no ipod does.

      Plus, you can actually USE the thing to listen to music. It will allow you to select a song without clicking through two dozen others before finding the one you want, and it will play albums in the correct order using a drawer/directory file system.

      Why anyone would buy a "shuffle" over this is beyond me. (BTW, this cube has a shuffle mode, too)

      As far as the form factor goes, yeah, I can see it being annoying if you're wearing skin-tight clothes, but it should be no big deal to drop the cube in a jacket pocket, or clip it to a belt-loop.

      --
      "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    3. Re:iPod Shuffle smaller? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      But a Creative Muvo has all thos features, same price point and no stupid cable to loose. For many , it is even better because it uses regular AAA batteries instead of proprietary LiIon that will wear out then you are screwed.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    4. Re:iPod Shuffle smaller? by jimbolaya · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's also considerably cheaper than an iPod.

      Actually, a 1GB iPod shuffle is $129.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    5. Re:iPod Shuffle smaller? by jmelloy · · Score: 1

      The Shuffle has an ordered play mode.

  53. I've Got A Smaller One Right Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may have to squint at the jpg:

  54. Compared to a shuffle? by Decimal+Dave · · Score: 3, Informative

    This thing is almost exactly the same volume as the ipod shuffle (though a cube is arguably an inferior form factor), and requires a cable to connect it to a computer instead of having a built-in USB plug.

    That means it's not as useful as a self-contained portable storage device.

    --

    "Leave the strategizing to those of us with planet-sized brains." -Tycho
    1. Re:Compared to a shuffle? by randyest · · Score: 1

      "Almost exactly" is my favorite oxymoron, but please note that this thing is actually 20% smaller than an iPod shuffle by volume. It also has FM radio, which no ipod does. It's also considerably cheaper than an iPod.

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Compared to a shuffle? by twd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny thing, for those of us working in "secure" facilities where the security idiots^H^H^H^H^H^Hstaff think that USB is the mark of the beast, being able to leave the USB connection at home can be a big advantage.

      --
      ~*~ Tara
    3. Re:Compared to a shuffle? by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      Yes but unlike the Shuffle it has an OLED display to show you tracks, it also has an FM Player/Voice Recorder. And its volume is less then shuffle not significantly but it is smaller. (I dont have the exact dimensions with me at the moment but did a comparison when I first saw this). I prefer the shuffle form factor but the lack of the other features especially FM is a dealbreaker.

    4. Re:Compared to a shuffle? by aneuryzm · · Score: 1

      The device is to small for my taste, but one benifit from the cube design would be durability. No matter how unlikely it would be for your iPod shuffle to break in your pocket, it seems the cube would be able to take much more abuse without snapping in half.

    5. Re:Compared to a shuffle? by argent · · Score: 1

      It's also considerably cheaper than an iPod.

      Um, it's almost exactly the same price as the equivalent capacity iPod. :)

    6. Re:Compared to a shuffle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they frisking you for CD-Rs and floppy disks yet?

    7. Re:Compared to a shuffle? by randyest · · Score: 1

      Um, and it's considerably cheaper than any ipod with a display.

      Capacity isn't everything. For some, it's almost nothing. Of course, the same could be said about having a display and some input/control other than "next song" and "off." Thanks for sharing this alternate viewpoint.

      --
      everything in moderation
    8. Re:Compared to a shuffle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can understand using the ipod as a benchmark for harddrive based mp3 players, but why is the shuffle being mentioned here? As far as flash based players go, the shuffle lacks many of the features pretty much all the other flash players have, namely an FM tuner and LCD.

      I bow down to Apple marketing for being able to successfully sell a piece of junk like the shuffle. Bravo.

    9. Re:Compared to a shuffle? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      I actually favour the cable. I can have a look at the tiny display, and USB connections are not always where you want them (powered USB headers are on the backside of an Mac mini for instace). Most of the time, the adjecent USB ports are in use as well, and cables always fit, MP3 players generally won't. If possible they should use the default mini USB ports, so you can buy additional cables as well (as you cannot do with, say, sony).

      "Full" speed USB sucks however, no players will get high speed 480 Mbps connections, but 6 Mbps is really really (really) slow. It would take about 1400 seconds to fill up, or almost 23 minutes. That's way too long for me (my 1 GB USB stick does it at 14 MB/sec (!) - and that's the write speed).

    10. Re:Compared to a shuffle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it seems the cube would be able to take much more abuse without snapping in half.

      Yea, but then you wind up with a 1" square bruise/callous behind your pocket.

  55. Why would you want this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when you can get an Apple iPod and be cool.

    Remember: Apple gives you that added layer security with DRM. You know you're safe with Apple !!!

    Other companies? Who knows if they'll be around?

    just buy a Mac ;-)

  56. iFlea by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

    The article seems to be down, but is it smaller than this?
    http://gprime.net/video.php/ipodflea

    1. Re:iFlea by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Yeah right.
      That was also the first thing i thought about after reading the deadline :)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  57. And if the RIAA comes after you... by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...swallow the evidence.

    Of course the new Digital Millenium Toilet Act will let the RIAA hang around your house for a day or so until the evidence reappears.

  58. Yeah, but... by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 1, Funny

    Realistically, how big is the market for this? How many people want to play the world's smallest MP3? Does it play normal size MP3s?

  59. Body part that is 1" square: by MondoMor · · Score: 0

    CmdrTaco's Brain (due mostly to the Duplicate Article Cortex).

  60. Washable? by intmainvoid · · Score: 1

    It'd better be washable, since something that small is going to be getting lost in my pockets for sure.

    1. Re:Washable? by whosyourlibra · · Score: 1

      ...and it might disappear into the sock abyss. That right there ruins the novelty for me.

  61. Re:M.Bison vs Motaro by PHP+Addict · · Score: 2, Funny

    So that's how it happened... I've spent many nights lying awake wondering what would happen if these two ever met.

    --
    Laziness, check. Impatience, check. Hubris, double check!
  62. Review by XCorvis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ooh, look! An actual review.

    1. Re:Review by dswensen · · Score: 1

      Yes, this review from ANYTHINGBUTIPOD.COM will surely provide fair, unbiased information.

  63. Comparable objects by SecularG · · Score: 1

    How did they go about making the screw stand up?

    1. Re:Comparable objects by Rangsk · · Score: 1

      All the objects are lying on the table, and the picture is from overhead.

      --
      "Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose." --Douglas Adams
    2. Re:Comparable objects by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Glue, most likely although other options are blutac, tape, and laying it on its side.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  64. mobiBlu? Or JNC? by Psionicist · · Score: 3, Informative

    The mp3-player is also known as JNC SSF-8100: http://www.jnc-digital.com.au/products_details.php ?id=66#

    So, as the mobiblu site's down, who _actually_ created this?

    1. Re:mobiBlu? Or JNC? by Ctawp · · Score: 1

      JNC doesn't have all the same colors though? MOBIblu has orange and red.

    2. Re:mobiBlu? Or JNC? by CptSkippy · · Score: 1

      It was probably designed by a 3rd party company like Inno Designs and who ever commissioned it didn't pay for exclusive rights so they're selling the design to whoever wants it.

      The JNC version is only 512mbs so I'd venture to say it came first since it's technically inferrior.

    3. Re:mobiBlu? Or JNC? by sci50514 · · Score: 0

      Aztech from Singapore created it. The rest all slapped their brands onto it.

      http://www.aztech.com/press/2005/PressMP3.pdf

  65. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by VidEdit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yup, the shuffle is easier to pocket, but a display screen, nested folders, WMA playback and an FM tuner kick in features Apple is to elitist to include. (PS, I'm writing this missive on my Powerbook...but I do think Apple is elitist.)

    --
  66. Marketing hype? by hazzey · · Score: 1

    16 hours (wma) or 8 hours (mp3) just seems too amazing from something that small. Assuming that half of the device is battery (the other half is controls, memory, processor), this leaves half a cubic inch for a battery.

    It would be interesting if true though. At that size, you could just integrate it into the headphones.

  67. the first rule of the iPod micro is by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do not eat this micro iPod.

    Do not eat this microsized music player.

    Do not eat it.

    You have been warned!

    1. Re:the first rule of the iPod micro is by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Don't eat it...

      Don't eat it...

      Dont...

      Eat it...

      Eat it.

      -- I hate warning labels... they get so confusing.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:the first rule of the iPod micro is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, NOW you tell me.

      And for all those people talking about how it's the same volume as the Shuffle, you try swallowing that thing! Cubes are way easier to get down...

  68. Fat Finger Problem... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    If the average geek really has fingers 1 inch square, then that would explain a lot of typo's on Sloshdat...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Fat Finger Problem... by eosp · · Score: 1

      But it doesnt explain the grammar error's...

  69. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by Decimal+Dave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the headline reads that this is the worlds smallest mp3 player... yet if I take the usb cap off my ipod shuffle, it's volume is measurably less than that of the DAH-1500. Does that mean I've had the world's smallest mp3 player since february, and nobody's come out with anything smaller?

    --

    "Leave the strategizing to those of us with planet-sized brains." -Tycho
  70. Obl Futurama Quote by indig0 · · Score: 2, Funny


    Leela: What's the matter Amy? Did you swallow your MP3 player again?

  71. Spam by teknokracy · · Score: 1

    I can see the spam subject lines now..

    "DECREASE YOUR CUBE SIZE **NOW!** WITH M0B1BLU!!!11!"

  72. ogg vorbis? by martalli · · Score: 1

    What I really want is a player that:
    1. Plays ogg
    2. Uses aa/aaa
    3. Takes flash cards (SD, miniSD, etc)

    Also nice:
    A large commercial website that can handle the load of /. visitors

    1. Re:ogg vorbis? by ciroknight · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sorry kid, we passed that stop almost 4 years ago with the RIO players (except that OGG part.. but if you're seriously using OGG, well, I'm sorry. It might offer superior compression, I dunno, but nothing supports it and nothing ever will. MP3 (and too soon, MP4) is too ubiquitous to ever seriously be challenged).

      The fact is, rechargeable batteries are better all around. Better for the environment, better for battery life, even though it might be more inconvienent to recharge. And if that's your problem there are plenty of add-on devices that supply external power to portable media players, cell phones, laptops, etc, while being extremely portable themselves.

      As for flash cards, I'd love that too, but it just seems inpractical to carry around all of those flash cards when your player has an integrated thumbnail harddrive, and you've got a cable to attach it to your digital (video) camera. Even higher end digital cameras are starting to move towards including harddrives simply because the storage density is hard to beat.

      Lastly, a request of my own (other than for people to stop trolling about Ogg, the superior format that failed just like Betamax): a waterproof player. I've found a few water-tight cases for my iPod, but they all make it feel more clunky than it should be. I'd love to hack my iPod and seal it up for water-tight uses, but it's still under warranty and will be for a long, long time, so I'm stuck with my shitty iCondom.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    2. Re:ogg vorbis? by blackjackshellac · · Score: 1

      I have to respectfully disagree with you about ogg, if only because I have about 120GB of my cds ripped as ogg.

      And my Neuros audio 128MB player does support ogg ;)

      BTW, I also expect to see more and more of the kinds of features that the original poster was looking for when the portable linux based hand helds start to become more ubiquitous. Hey, it might even happen.

      --
      Salut,

      Jacques

    3. Re:ogg vorbis? by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a right to my opinion too, and it's based off of the simple economic prinipal of the law of demand. When demand is virtually non-existant, cost is through the roof (basically, you'll have to build your own, which, you Linux guys won't have too much of an objection with, eh?).

      I expect to see the media players like Dell's to become more and more feature rich, but I also expect to see music players as a whole go more and more towards the iPod; design simplicity, and cheap components. While not everyone would consider a laptop HD as a cheap component, the only viable alternative is flash, and to get flash in the densities of HDs would require multiple thousands of dollars.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    4. Re:ogg vorbis? by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a right to my opinion too, and it's based off of the simple economic prinipal of the law of demand.

      Exactly correct. Which is why iAudio, iRiver, Neuros, Samsung and others DO offer Ogg Vorbis in their hardware. You don't really think they're doing it out of the goodness of their hearts, do you?

      There was a large number of people who simply refused to buy an "mp3 player" until it also played Ogg. These companies saw that, and responded.

      I know: I was one of those hold-outs. Six months ago I bought a 20GB iRiver H320 for $214 from Best Buy. About the size of an iPod, you should see the ipukes jaws hang slack when they see my H320 playing an episode of Futurama, or LOTR! lol!

      Apple fanatics...*shakes head*
      http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/iProduct.gif

      --
      "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    5. Re:ogg vorbis? by martalli · · Score: 1

      I'd like to take a digital audio player over to India with our next trip...but the thought of recharging a $200+ player with an erratic (spiking) power source is disconcerting. On the other hand, my camera already uses rechargable aa's (Canon A95), so why not bring a few rechargable aaa's? They use the same versatile and fast recharger. If the recharger gets fried, batteries get lost, or run out at an airport, just pop in a few from the local shop. I can't get an ipod or iriver battery in any dusty Indian village...or even the airport in Kuwait. Honestly, the memory of a HD player sounds best, but I doubt that I could get a HD player that runs off aa or aaa batteries....

  73. It could actually be useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15 silver points to anybody who builds this into another device, or casemods it into something interesting, like an article of clothing.

  74. But does the We Love Katamari soundtrack fit? by tepples · · Score: 1

    The player is 24x24x24 milimeters (about the size of the tip of your finger or various small items)

    I bet you're already thinking "how big of a katamari do I need to roll up one of those?" but please keep the Katamari Damacy fanboyism to the Games section.

  75. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by orasio · · Score: 1

    24 mm / 25.4 mm/inch = 0.945 inches

    0.945" ^3 = 0.844 cubic inches, or something near that.

    1.06 is bigger than 0.844

    And it's a cube.
    It's cool.
    Just because Apple doesn't sell it, it doens't mean it can't seem cool to some people.

    Of course, the shuffle is still easier to fit in your pocket, still.

    And maybe it's not for your pocket, it's something to hang with your keys. Or hanging from your neck.
    Or sitting on your desk.

  76. Tech Specs from the website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AUDIO FORMATS
    MP3 (MPEG 2/3-Layer 2/3, 4-320Kbps), WMA (Microsoft Windows Media Audio, 2-320Kbps), and new formats by Software upgrade

    BUILT-IN MEMORY
    256MB / 512MB / 1GB

    PLAY TIME
    36 hours with WMA (64Kbps) or 18 hours with MP3 (128Kbps) per 256MB

    HEADPHONE OUTPUT POWER
    4 ? / 150mW

    AUDIO OUTPUT FREQUENCY
    0.2Hz ~ 200KHz

    AUDIO SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO
    340dB

    FM FREQUENCY
    87.50MHz - 101.00MHz

    FM SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO
    60dB

    PC INTERFACE
    USB 2.0

    DOWNLOAD SPEED
    Max. 678Mbps

    AVAILABLE COLOR
    Orange, Green, and Pink
    for all storage sizes

    POWER SUPPLY
    Built-in NiCAD Battery

    BATTERY LIFE
    Approximately 57 hours

    DIMENSIONS
    0.94" x 0.94" x 0.94"
    24mm x 24mm x 24mm

    WEIGHT
    0.23 Ounces (8 Grams)

  77. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The volume is a bit smaller. 1 inch is 25.4 mm.
    (24/25.4)^3=.84 cubic inches .84/1.06=0.79 times the volume of an ipod shuffle.

  78. I rate it 4 stars. by argent · · Score: 1

    Looks nicer in this review than in TFA. I really like the fact that you just copy files to it to play... the Magic Star "Grey Whale" player (which I still think is the spiritual ancestor of the Shuffle) worked the same way, and it was very convenient.

    The Magic Star player is in some ways a better design: it doesn't need a USB sync cable because it had a USB jack like the shuffle's. I don't see why they couldn't build the USB jack into the headphone dongle, though.

    Having a display in a box that small and cheap is pretty good. I still wish it was flatter and longer so it was more pocketable.

    It looks like it has the same problem that the Magic Star player did. Low speed USB 1.1 interface. Make it USB 2.0 and eliminate the sync cable and you've got a winner.

  79. too bad... by KillShill · · Score: 1

    that those greedy portable music manufacturers don't include an expandable memory slot, then one could seriously consider buying a flash-based player.

    i'm not going to buy a player that is locked in the amount of storage it has. that's as silly as someone buying a digital camera that ONLY has internal memory.

    anyone know if there are any good players with expandable flash storage?

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
  80. Actually by i_should_be_working · · Score: 5, Informative

    The one sold at walmart is usb 2.0

    1. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one from Walmart is improperly marked. We've been going over this repeatedly at slickdeals. The USB is painfuly slow and nowhere near 2.0

    2. Re:Actually by zx75 · · Score: 1

      USB 2.0 Hi-Speed or Full-Speed? Here is why we love naming ambiguities, because people who don't understand them don't think anything about not putting them in.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    3. Re:Actually by Vizthex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually apple has a one up on this. The Fleapod. =P http://gprime.net/video.php/ipodflea

    4. Re:Actually by shawnce · · Score: 1

      The documentation from the website says 6 Mbps and USB 1.1.

  81. For people with pointy fingers only by jurt1235 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or with an extention set so you can use the controls.

    BTW: I think I will paint one dot on side on, 6 on the opposite, 2 on another, 5 on that opposite, and 3 and 4 dots on the two remaining sites. Then I can use it for monopoly.

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
  82. Why the hell is this a troll? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems perfectly reasonable to me...The main problem these days is fitting a functionally sized UI onto the smallest possible player, but if you made a UI-less player, built into some headphones, say, with a bluetooth UI hooked into a watch or something, that would kick ass.

    Mods on crack I tell ya.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  83. 'Windows System' by hungrygrue · · Score: 1
    It is a USB 1.1 device which shows up as a generic USB storage device. Great. No hassle using it under Linux. However, they have chosen interesting wording on the website.
    " By connecting the product to PC, the Windows system identifies it as a removable disk. No additional software needed. "
    Windows system? What the hell does my window manager have to do with mounting drives? You would think that since they have designed a product that is OS independent and requires no silly drivers, that they would let their marketing folks know so they don't wind up with crap like that on their website.
  84. hearing aid form factor by peter303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They should fit the whole contraption in a hearing aid size form factor. Then have a wireless control either on a ring or wristwatch form factor.

  85. Worlds Smallest: exactly how many world's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are we talking about here?

  86. iPod flea by BlueEar · · Score: 3, Funny

    They've got nothing on iPod Flea!

    --
    A religious war is an adult version of a fight over who has the best imaginary friend
  87. USB 2.0 by thrill12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Highspeed (400+Mbit) or Fullspeed (11Mbit). I gather the last, which is practically completely compatible to USB 1.1 - same slow speed.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:USB 2.0 by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      hmmm...

      yeah, I forgot about that. I had read that they just renamed USB 1.1 to 2.0 Fullspeed, so that it's exactly, not just almost, like 1.1. Tricky bastards.

      Although Dap Review, where I got the info from about the mobiBlu, seems to think it's the faster one.

  88. Two questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1. Does this play the podcasts? 2. Does it have the internet in it?

    1. Re:Two questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not to reply to my own post, but I came up with some more questions:

      3. Does it play the music from itunes?
      4. Does it ship with the itunes software?
      5. Is it legal to download this thing?

    2. Re:Two questions by mr_flea · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have quite enough memory to store the internet. And no, you can't download it, you have to go "outside" to buy it.

  89. Not the smallest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the iPod Flea?

  90. Since... by freeplatypus · · Score: 1

    Since when size matters.... oops *ducks*

  91. Re:Optional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    High-speed is optional in the USB 2.0 specs.

  92. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by Pansy · · Score: 1

    WMA playback is not a feature, it's more like a DRM virus...

    --
    People are the problem, stop procreation now!
  93. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yup, the shuffle is easier to pocket, but a display screen, nested folders, WMA playback and an FM tuner kick in features Apple is to elitist to include.

    Oh, I do think it's a nice little unit, though I'd rather have it do MP4 than WMA since WMA is kind of tied in to Windows. The functionality and price are all good, but I'd rather they have made it a less clumsy shape even if it was in a slightly larger box.

    Incidentally, the thing that I miss the most about my shuffle is the clock. Since it doesn't have a clock, it can't update the "last play" time in iTunes when it syncs, so my clever set of chained smart playlists for Party Shuffle can't account for and avoid dups for the music that I listen to on my shuffle.

    I suppose I could write a script that I could run before and after syncing the shuffle to put the songs whose play counts have changed into a "recent shuffled" playlist, but I think I've already spent way too much time on fine-tuning my iTunes settings.

  94. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by rsborg · · Score: 1
    Yup, the shuffle is easier to pocket, but a display screen, nested folders, WMA playback and an FM tuner kick in features Apple is to elitist to include.

    Fuck that. I don't want a shit-ass FM receiver, nor do I give any number of shits for WMA. Anyone who doesn't realize that mp3 is THE standard for portable music is on crack. I'm don't hear much whining that other players don't put AAC playback on *their* players.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  95. spin is a polite way of saying, "lying" by SuperBanana · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    To sum up: normal finger tips are not 1" in diameter.

    "Spin is a polite way of saying, 'lying'". I forget who said that, but I think it was during a Charlie Rose interview. The guy said that after decades of "spin", we accept, both as consumers and voters, the most outlandish concepts.

    "I know how to run a business, that means I'd make a great governor" was one Mitt Romney used, except that his hard-hitting my-way-or-the-highway style pissed off the entire statehouse, and he hasn't accomplished a single thing he promised he would. That style works great in business when you're the head of a mega-powerful takeover/investment firm like Bain. Works great on a personal level too when you're rich, white, and a powerful businessman (and before anyone gets too uppity, I had a close friend who worked at Bain for several years. Romney's a dick.) It does not work on a political level where you are one of three branches of a government (you're not "the boss", by any stretch of the imagination), surrounded by "the enemy" in a "liberal" state with a lot of other entrenched egos who see you as nothing but a johnny-come-lately looking to get into the white house.

    Marketers have for decades hinted at crap like "If you don't use our toothpaste, she won't fuck you". Why are you surprised they claim a 1" cube is "fingertip"? It's shown in photos with a male hand, which from the proportions is itself enormous. They're trying their damnedest...

    It's tiny, and impressively so; it makes the Shuffle kind of look like the 2001 Monolith. Why can't they just say "it's really really small"? If I had been in their shoes, I would have just shown it next to the quarter and said "about the size of a quarter". Credibility in marketing is a powerful thing, at least to me.

  96. Don't Give One of These To Andrea Corr! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    She loses everything - cell phone, tin whistles, sisters...even herself.

    Caroline Corr: "She's dizzy. She gets lost and stuff...You know, in airports, you're looking for Andrea. And she's lost her passport...she's lost her boarding pass."

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  97. Lost more cell phones than MP3 players by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    but that's probably because they don't track your location with MP3 players, plus tunes are more useful.

    Reminds me of those SNL skits - but instead of teeny cell phones, it's teeny MP3 players ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  98. Available in the US... (update to own article) by argent · · Score: 1
    If you look at the story archive... you can get it at Walmart.

    July 21, 2005
    MobiBLU DAH-1500 with DRM at Walmart

    We just did a review on this last week and the verdict was that it is a very nice player. It was disappointing to our US readers that it wasn't available in the states, until now.

    Walmart is now selling the MobiBLU DAH-1500 in six different colors and two different sizes: 512MB and 1GB. It is also price right inline with the iPod Shuffle, $99.72 and $129.72 respectively. New to this version is DRM support, but it only mentions that that it works with Walmart downloads. Read the MobiBLU DAH-1500 review and pick one up.
  99. Re:Optional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then what is the difference between what this player has and USB 1?

  100. Cube form factor? by shawnce · · Score: 1

    I have to say that is a dumb form factor.

    Who wants a 1" cube bulging in their pocket? I would hate to sit down with that thing in my pocket.

    Or under their shirt at the end of a lanyard? It wouldn't hang well, stick out noticeably and don't get it between you and a surface.

    Also good luck trying to hold that thing in a way the allows you to use the controls.

  101. How about getting over your Walmart phobia? by randyest · · Score: 1

    Which other national chain has these in stock? Or shall we compile a list of "mom & pop" retailers and link to that list by region, then completely ignore that the world's largest retailer is selling this new startup product? That seems like part of the news to me.

    After all, it is the world's largest retailer, and when they carry a new tech product it tends to (1) sell well and (2) be reasonably priced.

    Wally world isn't my favorite store for anything, but you anti-Walmart zealots make me want to shop there more just to piss you off.

    --
    everything in moderation
    1. Re:How about getting over your Walmart phobia? by Pansy · · Score: 1
      As for my "Wal-Mart phobia", I do not fear the retailer or anything about them. I do however find their business practices to be morally reprehensible and decline to support them, as well as urging others to do the same.

      I'm sorry that my being a responsible consumer and trying to educate others about the ultimate end the money they give to a corporation meets upsets you. I really am, because it indicates that you really don't care what the real cost (in terms of the standard of living of the employees and cost to the taxpayers) of patronizing these businesses is. Your attitude is by no means unique, and that's why I try to talk to as many people as possible about irresponsible corporations like Wal-Mart, McDonalds, Starbucks, and others.

      That being said, I won't dispute that it is news that Wal-Mart is selling this product. The mention of Wal-Mart and no other retailers does make it more likely that individuals who wish to purchase this product will go there. My post was intended to make them think twice about it. As for patronizing local businesses and smaller franchise retailers, sometimes it does take extra effort, but that's the price of having a concience when you're deciding which business entity to fund.

      As for your desire to piss me off by shopping at Wal-Mart, I fail to see the utility in reacting in that manner, and frankly it seems childish.

      If you disagree with one of my causes, start your own movement advocating the opposite viewpoint, that's what activism is about. Being anti-activist in general however does no-one any good.

      --
      People are the problem, stop procreation now!
    2. Re:How about getting over your Walmart phobia? by randyest · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing; I'm aware of the complaints some have against Walmart. I just don't believe the ones that are of any consequence (most of it is pure whining, IMHO.)

      I have no "desire to piss [you] off by shopping at Wal-Mart." I'm just trying to show how zealotry can often have the opposite of the desired effect. Continue to ignore that reality at your own peril.

      This mp3 player is being showcased/introduced by Walmart and you chided the poster for not recommending one or more of the "hundreds" of "less evil" alternate stores (none of which did you bother to list yourself.) The odds are that any you might have named, including many "mom & pop" stores, do the exact same things Walmart does, on a smaller scale, yet get miffed that some other company does it better and on a larger scale.

      Please don't tell me to be an activist. I know what activism is all about. I don't want to be an activist. I'd rather just do my best to lend some balance to the claims that activists such as yourself make. To me, "activism" (especially when manifest as barely on-topic walmart-bashing posts oin slashdot is not as noble as you seem to think.





      Is your car powered by your own sense of self-satisfaction?

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:How about getting over your Walmart phobia? by scatters · · Score: 1

      I don't shop there now since they cancelled their meet-market. Hmmm, romance at Wal*Mart.

      http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050723/ap_on_fe_st/br f_wal_mart_singles;_ylt=Aq.pTJJd9Gqx2qGWRtt0EnjtiB IF;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

      ROANOKE, Va. - Wal-Mart has ditched a program that helped single shoppers find love in the discount store's aisles.
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Officials at Wal-Mart headquarters in Bentonville, Ark., ordered their Roanoke store to put an end to Singles Shopping, the only program of its kind at Wal-Mart's U.S. stores.

      Taking a cue from Wal-Marts in Germany, the month-old program encouraged customers on Friday evenings to pick up a red bow they could place on their shopping carts as an invitation to other singles. "Flirt points" were set up in various sections of the store.

      A Wal-Mart spokesman declined to comment on the reason behind the program's cancellation. But customer Dale Firebaugh, who showed up Friday night hoping to meet his match, said store employees told him several people had complained.

      "I'm disappointed," said Firebaugh, 63. "Where can someone over 40 who doesn't smoke or drink or go to bars meet someone?"

      --
      A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
    4. Re:How about getting over your Walmart phobia? by Pansy · · Score: 1
      Yes, those employees who live below the federal poverty line and are forced to seek public assistance sure are a whiny bunch. Nevermind the fact that "Wal-Mart costs federal taxpayers over $1.5 billion a year in welfare to their employees", or that "Wal-Mart fails to cover 60% of their workers with any health insurance" [walmartwatch.com].

      I have no "desire to piss [you] off by shopping at Wal-Mart."
      Your first post specifically says, "you anti-Walmart zealots make me want to shop there more just to piss you off." I understand your point, but I just wanted to point that out.

      I didn't list alternatives because ideally you would go out and buy the device from an independent local retailer, and I don't know all of them. Incidentally, unless you can provide some sort of evidence, I have to dismiss your claim that, "many 'mom & pop' stores, do the exact same things Walmart does" as vacuous. Most small businesses I know don't try to force their employees to seek state or federal assistance to save money. They also don't manipulate suppliers into sending manufacturing jobs over-seas. And most small businesses I know provide insurance for more than 40% of their employees. I haven't heard of any of my local businesses locking their employees in the store overnight either. Most importantly, most small businesses I know don't have the market-share to drive their competitors out of business in such a fashion that the competitor has no recourse (i.e. they simply can't compete on price). No, I think I'm completely justified in saying that the actions Wal-Mart takes that I oppose are most certainly not perpetrated in a widespread fasion by the average small business.

      As for activism being noble, I don't do it because it's noble, I do it because I have a concience and I couldn't sleep at night if I didn't try to do something about the injustices I see. Not that a more harmonious society doesn't have an immediate beneficial impact on me personally. As for barely on-topic, I'll concede that this discussion is moving rapidly in that direction, however I don't think my original quip was too far out of line.

      As for my car, no, I'm working on building a bio-diesel processor like this to run an old VW someone gave me on though. I don't drive that much anyway, I can ride my bike just about anywhere I need to go unless it's snowing. I'm sure that was rhetorical, but I just wanted to point out that I don't think I'm perfect, but I do make a concious effort to try to get a little closer to perfection every day. And yes, I do get an immense feeling of self-satisfaction from it.

      --
      People are the problem, stop procreation now!
    5. Re:How about getting over your Walmart phobia? by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      I work with Wal-Mart daily as a vendor, I talk to regular Wal-Mart employees all the time and I haven't seen evidence to support your claims. Even if Wal-Mart cost 1.5 billion a year in welfare (which I doubt, or dispute that Wal-Mart's involvement changes what these people would do), they still pay like 16 billion in taxes. Also, the insurance issue is the worst kind of skewed reasoning; it's optional insurance, so employees aren't automatically docked if they choose not to participate. Health insurance is optional at MOST employers, if they choose not to participate, then that is their decision. Wal-Mart employees certainly get more for their money, insurance-wise, than I get with my non-Wal-Mart employer. And as a vendor, Wal-Mart doesn't try to manipulate us any more than any of our other corporate customers. The customer always want more for less, the vendor always wants to give less for more.

      Anyway, I haven't talked to a Wal-Mart employee who acted unhappy or whispered stories of injustice along with a plea to sneak them out. In the Corporate offices the usual Dilbert politics exist, but again no worse than I've seen at other companies.

      I'll admit, before I started to work with Wal-Mart I held some of your opinions. I ate up the articles that tried to dig up dirt. I ignored the people who insisted that statistics were being twisted and stories were being fabricated. In my opinion, attacking Wal-Mart is the sign of an easily swayed mind; I mean, it's so big you can hardly miss it, people with their own agendas will attack something we all know. Hitler did the same with the Jews, they were an important part of society and every German could relate because they all knew some Jews. Hitler never needed to explain the concept of Jews to the Germans. That would have taken a lot of resources and most Germans wouldn't have cared because it never affected them. Attacking Wal-Mart is easy because no one has to explain what Wal-Mart is. Another example would be cell phones. Someone started spreading rumors that cell phones, something common to many of us, caused brain cancer. Coincidentally, stickers and other products appeared that claimed to prevent cell phone cancer. Attack something we all know, and many will believe you. Then you can satisfy the urge to feel important and in control of a group of people, and possibly profit from their efforts. For many, the lure of power is enough, it's why you see so many protest groups around. Find something ordinary to protest, and you can instantly build a group of people to control.

      Worked for the Nazis.

    6. Re:How about getting over your Walmart phobia? by JonXP · · Score: 1

      "I'm disappointed," said Firebaugh, 63. "Where can someone over 40 who doesn't smoke or drink or go to bars meet someone?"

      Hasn't he ever head of IRC? ;-)

    7. Re:How about getting over your Walmart phobia? by Pansy · · Score: 1
      Wow, I can't believe you just compared me to a Nazi. I probably shouldn't even respond to you, but you're comment is just so far out of line I can't help myself.

      Regarding insurance, employees choose not to take it because it's terrible coverage, the typical deductible is $1000. That's a lot to swallow when you're only making $14k a year. The fact of the matter is that Wal-Mart spends significantly less on insurance than the average US employer, 37.5% less as a matter of fact (http://fivestones.sitestream.com/pdf/2005-annual- report.pdf). The insurance is cheap yes, but it doesn't cover the average Wal-Mart employee where they really need it. That's why they're forced to seek state-sponsored coverage.

      As for the employees you've seen, I don't know too many companies where the people in the corporate offices complain. But I do know that Wal-Mart mistreats their store-level employees in a variety of ways. Their history of sexism is well documented and in litigation as we speak. They're also facing lawsuits for making people work off the clock, and they've already lost more than one. Their practice of locking in employees at night while they're stocking to reduce shrink is also well documented. I don't dispute that the higher level employees may be happy, a decent salary has a way of keeping people's mouths shut.

      I'm not even gonna touch your last statement, comparing Hitler and the Jews to an issue like this is so far out of line I wouldn't know where to begin.

      --
      People are the problem, stop procreation now!
    8. Re:How about getting over your Walmart phobia? by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you wouldn't address the Hitler/Jews link. I was merely using it as an example of one way a man has started a movement by attacking something that was common to everyone. Surely you want to claim that the anti-Wal-Mart movement is justified, and not someone's great idea for getting some form of power, or feeling important?

  102. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by HeelToe · · Score: 1

    Pointer to those useful sounding scripts?

    Thanks.

  103. Re:Ok now lets ask the important question. by raypsaliga · · Score: 0, Troll

    Interesting. Did you happen to make your post on a computer? Any piece of electronics? Where do you think that was built? Take of your watch, don't drive your car, the commies could have sabatoged those too. The cold war is over Tex.

  104. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by NetDanzr · · Score: 1
    Fuck that. I don't want a shit-ass FM receiver, nor do I give any number of shits for WMA. Anyone who doesn't realize that mp3 is THE standard for portable music is on crack.

    The players supports .mp3 and .wma; not only .wma. I personally don't care about .wma too much, but I'm always happy when I'm given more choices.

  105. iPod flea is smaller by skoda · · Score: 1

    The iPod flea is even smaller.

    Also here

  106. Smallest? Ha! Meet the iFly! by vitalyb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    See it here.

    P.S Might not play well on Firefox but see anyway!

    1. Re:Smallest? Ha! Meet the iFly! by vitalyb · · Score: 1

      Err, sorry. iFlea, not iFly =\.

  107. Re:Optional by rm999 · · Score: 1

    Actually, Walmart is selling an enchanced version with usb 2.0 added and the ability to play walmart's drm files (wma). I am fairly certain this means high speed transfers. http://www.i4u.com/section-viewarticle-101.html lists the max download speed at 6 Mbps.

  108. The smallEST? by A+shadow+in+the+dark · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You probably never heard of the iPod Flea ?

  109. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by shawnce · · Score: 1

    So you get all those features in a wonderful form factor... one with the controls on one face of the cube and the screen on another face (forcing an handedness among other usability issues). Of course you have to hold this thing some how while attempting to use the screen and controls yet all dimensions are the same and small (average thumb pad is about the same size as one of the faces).

    Also great to put in you pocket... *rolls eyes*

    Nice features bad bad form factor.

  110. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually as stated on the website

    DIMENSIONS
    0.94" x 0.94" x 0.94"
    24mm x 24mm x 24mm

    Which would be 0.83 cubic inch.

    But still, the shuffle fits much better.

  111. Don't worry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got something else 24mm in size that I'd like to give her!

  112. So there's some good and some bad by hacker · · Score: 1

    This player is intrguing, and has some nice features: Small, light, portable, and has OLED and an actual display (which devices like the iPod Shuffle do not).

    However, I do not see the one thing that makes it a blocker for me: How long does the battery life last... in lifetime? 10 hours per-charge if you drain it fully, but does it only last 100 charges? 1000? More? Less?

    I don't like buying $130.00 "disposable" products, but it seems that is what our society is breeding now. "Its only $300.00, just throw it away and buy a new one!" (speaking of a certain printer that had some issues, and was cheaper to buy a new one than than keep fixing the existing one. The same can be said for quite a few products these days; PDAs, mp3 players, DVD players, headphones, etc.)

    It seems like these vendors are continuing to churn out "degrading" products in the hopes that we will keep replacing them with new ones, hopefully from the same vendor. We are not CONSUMERS, we do not "consume" technology like our cars "consume" gas. We are customers, and we expect quality products for our hard-earned dollars, not trash that "expires" in 6 months and gets tossed in a drawer.

    So does this thing last 3+ years while charging every day? Does it have a decent LiIon battery to take that number of recharge cycles?

    1. Re:So there's some good and some bad by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

      How long does the battery life last... in lifetime? 10 hours per-charge if you drain it fully,

      17 hours, according to the manual.

      but does it only last 100 charges? 1000? More? Less?

      Don't worry, you'll lose the thing before the battery poops out.

      --
      "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    2. Re:So there's some good and some bad by nolife · · Score: 1

      How long does the battery life last... in lifetime?

      Well, according the the Wal-Mart description, the player has a Lithium Polymer battery. According to Wikipedia, this type of battery has a recharge cycle anywhere from 500-10000 cycles depending on the type. Your guess is as good as mine. I'd assume from my reading, a poor quality charging system could be very harmful to this type of battery, more damage then a poor quality charger for other common types of rechargable batteries.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  113. Cool! Now parents can update their routines! by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    Forget violins. Now you can go to your whiny teenager and say, "this is the world's smallest MP3 player, playing just for you" and not be lying.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  114. Battery Run Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Small, portable, blah, blah, but it's not much good if it gets only 10-15 minutes of runtime from its' dinky little battery.

    While I'm spouting off for no good reason, might I mention the rarely (if ever) seen features that I'd personally LOVE to see in a small mp3 player:

    * Small. Like another poster implied earlier, a fit-in-your-pocket form factor is much better than a trip-to-the-ER-cause-you-sat-on-it-cube.

    * USB 2.0 connector. No one wants to wait for stuff to upload.

    * Internal storage is removable flash media (preferably popular and therefore cheap rather than the rare and expensive -- like in my damn cel phone). Makes it ungradable, and you can swap media for different compilations. I also prefer flash over tiny hard drives because of the lack of moving parts.

    * Make the damn thing water-proof or at least water-resistant. Not too hard with solid state. Also, there's a big difference between "my player got wet and the batteries shorted and died" and "my player got wet and died."

    * Takes 2 AA batteries (fairly inexpensive and readily available). Heck you can use rechargables if you want.

    * Decent run time on new batteries. Granted mp3 decoding takes a little muscle, even with a dedicated chip, which equals additional juice usage, but keeping the die small should help.

    Bottom line: interchangable components, commodity parts, etc, etc. ...Which is probably why such a design would never fly. There's far too much of a push towards disposablility.

    Oh well.

  115. iPod Shuffle is 25% bigger, better shape by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative
    Apple annoyingly uses Antique measurement units, as opposed to metric, but the size is 3.3 x 0.98 x 0.33 = 1.067 cubic inches = 17484 mm3. (Not sure whether that's with the USB-jack cover on or not.) The cube is 13824 mm3. So the Shuffle is a bit larger, but yes, I'd rather carry a flat object than a clunky-shaped object.

    But you don't put this thing in your pants pocket you'd need a really long headset cord and it'd get caught on things. Either you put it in your shirt pocket (where flat is also better), or you just leave it hanging from the cord, in which case flat is usually better as well.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:iPod Shuffle is 25% bigger, better shape by slevin · · Score: 2, Funny

      But a cube will fit much better in my eyesocket. No way am I getting a shuffle in there.

    2. Re:iPod Shuffle is 25% bigger, better shape by timeOday · · Score: 1

      You really can't compare this Cube to the Shuffle anyways, because the Cube has a display and FM radio.

  116. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by MushMouth · · Score: 1

    let alone the fact that the Shuffle doesn't have a stupid custom usb cable to lose or have carry around to charge the thing.

  117. how small can they go? by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
    I guess the ultimate would be for the player to be built into a pair of in-ear headphones. Better yet, built the player into one half, and have it hook up to the other half wirelessly.

    Make it so that the two halves can sense how far apart they are, and have it turn off or pause when they are either very close together, or farther apart than the width of your head. That would be a nice simple interface: put the headphones in and it starts, take them out and it stops.

    If you could put a motion sensor in one, you could use a gesture-based interface. Pull it out and shake it to do shuffle play. Move it in a circle to change volume. Flick it up/down to skip forward, flick it left/right to skip backward.

  118. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by shawnce · · Score: 1

    I need to correct myself... aspect of the controls live on two opposite faces (menu/hold on one face and play, volume, arrows on the other).

    Also the screen is square obviously... not the best for showing song names.

  119. You insensitive clod by lbmouse · · Score: 1

    "...about the size of the tip of your finger or various small items..."
    She said it was how you use it that counts.

  120. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by argent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not scripts, just smart folders. Unfortunately I can't just dump the XML because the important stuff is binary gibberish.

    Basically, what I did was set up a series of smart folders:

    2star - Rating is 2 stars and last played is not in the last 2 months
    0star - Rating is 0 stars and last played is not in the last 6 weeks
    3star - Rating is 3 stars and last played is not in the last 3 weeks
    4star - Rating is 4 stars and last played is not in the last 4 days
    5star - rating is 5 stars and last played is not in the last 25 hours
    Weighted - playlist is 0star or 2star or 3star or 4star or 5star
    Ambient - Genre is not Hip-Hop and playlist is not Unambient and genre is not Opera and playlist is not Flakey and kind does not contain quicktime

    This works a lot better than just "play higher rated songs more often", because I know how often "more often" is. And I can tune things around, cut 5star down to 3 days or raise 3 stars up to 1 week when I'm feeling like more variety... that's how I ended up giving 0 star a frequency that's between 2 and 3 stars.

    Unambient is just a regular playlist where I put stuff that I don't want to listen to while I'm working. Flakey is another set of chained playlists. I don't play quicktime in ambient because the volume equalizing algorithm iTunes uses doesn't work for quicktime.

  121. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by huge+colin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ogg Vorbis is technically superior to MP3, so if I have a choice (and I often do), I'll take a Vorbis. I therefore am not interested in any player that doesn't play it.

  122. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or the 3.21 cubic inch ipod mini.

  123. wow by cahiha · · Score: 1

    24x24x24 milimeters (about the size of the tip of your finger

    If the tip of your finger is about 1"x1"x1", you either have elephantitis or are about 12' tall. Are your other appendages of such unusual size as well? If so, poor you.

  124. Re:M.Bison vs Motaro by sleighb0y · · Score: 1

    You must really have enjoyed Street Fighter and Mortal Kombat to respond to this post. Tell me, when MKII came out ( Mortal Tuesday, wasn't it? ) did you use the letter K where a C should have been in all your written work that day?

    Back in the day when the fighter-genre was all the rage and video games were for nerds only, damnit!!

  125. WROONNGGG by sp0rk173 · · Score: 2, Informative

    24x24x24 mm = 0.945" cubed.

    1. Re:WROONNGGG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:WROONNGGG by Patik · · Score: 1

      Oh shut the hell up, pedant. It's basically an inch squared. No one can conceptualize odd decimal volumes, describing it as an inch is sufficient.

  126. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    nice try... but you are rounding up. i understand, a lot of guys do this. 0.94"x0.94"x0.94" = 0.83 cubic inch it doesn't have the usb port built in, but adds an oled screen, fm, eq, and voice/fm recording.

  127. OK, I got my mm/inch conversions fubar-ed... by argent · · Score: 1

    Still, in practical terms it's less convenient than even significantly larger devices, like the Magic Star MP3 player I had before the shuffle.

    And it's a cube.
    It's cool.
    Just because Apple doesn't sell it, it doens't mean it can't seem cool to some people.


    What does cool have to do with it? The Magic Star player is uncool as anything, but like the Shuffle it just worked, it didn't need a display, and I liked it a lot.

    1. Re:OK, I got my mm/inch conversions fubar-ed... by orasio · · Score: 1

      Again.
      It's all about coolness.

      Regular mp3 players with 1Gb are a dime a dozen.

      The whole idea is the C00l|\|3z factor.
      Plus it's smaller than the Ipod, plus it has radio, plus it has a display, an OLED display!

      What I mean is that maybe it doesn't appeal to ipod buyers, but it sure has some appeal of its own, and even some convenience.

    2. Re:OK, I got my mm/inch conversions fubar-ed... by argent · · Score: 1

      Regular mp3 players with 1Gb are a dime a dozen.

      Until the shuffle showed up that would have been a pretty big dime, with 1GB flash players going in the vicinity of $200. I bought the shuffle because at $99 for 512M it was the cheapest name-brand player with that capacity by about $50, because it had really good sound.

      The shuffle really does have amazing sound for a flash player... it's got better bass than many of the disk-based players, even.

      I'm sure that for some people, there's coolness involved. But the shuffle came out at a killer price. If it was only "competitive" with the comparable flash players, it wouldn't have taken off anything like it id... but it wasn't just competitive, it wasn't even just cheaper, it was a blowaway price: the 1G shuffle was priced like a cheap 512M player, and the 512M shuffle was cheaper than most of the 256M players.

      This one is priced like the iPod, sized like the iPod, and it has more features. And it'll even work with iTunes for MP3 files... though I wish it supported MP4 (what Apple calls AAC) as well.

  128. LInks and pictures by sleepophile · · Score: 1

    here's a review and some pictures

  129. Let me spell it for you... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    m-i-l-i-m-e-t-e-r

    1. Re:Let me spell it for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know not of this "milimeter" thing you speak, but 1 inch is 25.4mm.

  130. They're just copying Apple by sootman · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, yet another pretender to the iPod Flea throne. :-)

    (Note: embedded WMV. For stills, go here or Google 'ipod flea'.)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  131. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

    I used to use a similar scheme for a few playlists on my full-sized iPod. Imagine my surprise when songs I had played in my Shuffle weren't showing up in my "Recently Played" playlist. I guess it's great they it still bumps the playcount, but date-stamping is something I really do miss from my full iPod. Even if it just stamped all played songs with the time you updated the Shuffle.

    Now I'm stuck using only star ratings and play counts to create the smart playlist(s) that I use to fill my shuffle. Oh well.

    Hey Apple, you listening?

  132. I love technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait for my 2GB, MP3 playing, insertable, voice activated, hearing aid (patent pending, (c) 2005 GBN, lol).

  133. Thin Client by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd prefer a 12cm x 12cm x 1cm device (with 5% more volume). I'd really prefer if this OLED/Flash device were flexible, so I could roll it up into a stylus for my smartphone, and unroll it for a QVGA display.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Thin Client by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Er, 12cm x 12cm x 1mm . Should have used the Preview button.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:Thin Client by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation -1
      100% Troll

      TrollMods really are screwing up Slashdot when a simple "upgrade" wishlist to the latest tech scares them as much as the Troll under their bed.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  134. Various small items by kelzer · · Score: 1

    The player is 24x24x24 milimeters (about the size of the tip of your finger or various small items)

    Most posters seemed to find the "size of the tip of your finger" part of this quote funny, but I personally find "or various small items" even funnier.

    Q: How big is 24x24x24 millimeters?

    A: About the size of various small items.

    Yeah, that's some real useful information.

    --

    ---------------------------------------------
    SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  135. Um... because it's meant to be worn as a.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    necklace? Think about it, it's a music amulet. The form factor is quite intelligent that way. hell, where's the gold leaf/chain combo. Booyaka Trendy!

  136. How about a smoother deseign.... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 0

    http://www.radioshack.com/product.asp?catalog_name =CTLG&product_id=42-8071/ Its small and does not require sdpecial drivers.

  137. This is newsworthy? This thing came out a YEAR AGO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thing has been out about a year ago. It's just some nitwit at slickdeals/fatwallet finally saw it cheap at walmart.com and thought it was new. This is so lame.

  138. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by neurocutie · · Score: 1

    All the features that you list as missing are included in the Creative Zen Nano Plus player, which is also about the same size and volume. I just got one and its great! It also runs off of common AAA batteries, alkaline or NiMH, so no issues of propriety batteries that need to be replaced by Apple CS.

  139. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

    Yup, the shuffle is easier to pocket, but a display screen, nested folders, WMA playback and an FM tuner kick in features Apple is to elitist to include. (PS, I'm writing this missive on my Powerbook...but I do think Apple is elitist.)

    Nested folders (or just seperate playlists) is the only thing I really think the Shuffle needs. I actually kinda like not having a display...less distraction from just listening to music. WMA playback? If you're talking about WMAs with DRM, I try to avoid DRM as much as possible (thank you, Hmyn project!)...if you're talking about getting music from friends who use WMA to rip their stuff...I look at such people as naughty puppies who just need a smack on the nose and pointed in the direction of a better codec. And FM tuner? Good god no...that's a feature that would not even be worth 5 extra dollars tacked onto the price for me. Too many people (myself included) live in areas where the radio selection sucks...those that are fortunate enough to have good radio in their area just need to pony up the 10 bucks to get themselves a portable FM radio.

    Multiple playlists though...god, that would make a 1GB Shuffle so much more useful. 240 songs is great, but being able to seperate them into two playlists of 120 would be so much better. Wouldn't necessarily require extra buttons...just use some combination of what's there (holding the skip button for 3 seconds while paused, for example, to bump forward to the next playlist).

    Hey Apple...once again, are you listening?

  140. Xenn mp3 player by evilninja · · Score: 1

    I was in Bangkok about two weeks ago and they were selling the Xenn XM-5, which bears a striking resemblance to the mobiBLUE DAH-1500.

  141. Sad part is... by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

    ...one of the few complaints I have about the iPod Shuffle is that it's too small. I actually paid for a little protective skin for it, not because I was worried about it getting scratched, but to make it a little larger and thus fit in my hand better. Go figure.

    And these guys are shooting to be smaller than a Shuffle? No thanks...especially with a shape that awkward.

  142. Idiot question: does it SOUND any good ? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    i'd love to see that oh-so-not-essential info mentionned in at least SOME MP players reviews ;-)

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  143. no ogg support by samokk · · Score: 1

    no ogg support => Trashcan

    1. Re:no ogg support by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Instead of buying one and then throwing it away, wouldn't it make more sense to simply NOT buy it in the first place?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:no ogg support by anubi · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't quite go that far...

      But I would much rather see ogg support than wma.

      I would be pretty sure that in several years, ogg files will still play.

      I have no confidence that wma files will play, as Microsoft can, has, and will change the file formats from time to time.

      I see wma compatibility as useless advertising fluff trying to ride Microsoft's gravy train.

      How can one possibly code anything to last if one has no confidence the file format owner will hold steadfast to his format? Compound this with the file format owners' tendency to toss lawsuits at those trying to make the file formats usable?

      I even have a Windows Media Player ( ver 6.4, ), yet I cannot see movie clips in the Windows Media formats, yet easily see them in .mpg, .avi ( including DivX).

      So, my interest in the player is strictly if the FM radio and MP3 capabilities, which I think are quite impressive.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    3. Re:no ogg support by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      So you're complaining that WMP 6.4 can't play WMP 9 and 10 files? Can Quicktime 5 play Quicktime 7 files? Can a VCD player play DVDs? Can my floppies work in my new holographic storage drive?
      Can this clay tablet fit into my dvd burner? Christ.

      It's like driving a 70 muscle car and bitching that you dont have the sleek lines and gas mileage of the newest cars. Upgrade you bastard! This is a tech site! Bleeding edge! Keep up or die trying!

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    4. Re:no ogg support by anubi · · Score: 1
      Nice car analogy... my car is 30 years old... runs great... and if it wasn't for trying to pass the visual part of the California Smog Check, I would put on an aftermarket fuel injection system not only to further drop emissions but get even better driveability and mileage than I get now... and what I get now ain't all that bad ( about 29MPG ).

      I resent being forced to change my computer systems which support a heck of a lot of my legacy work on the whims of a certain large company who can't standardize on a common file format. The physical limitations of my machine are quite adequate for what I do ( mostly schematic capture and PCB layout ). And I cross-compile code for embedded microprocessors. It doesn't take a gamer's quality blazing fast machine to do what I do.

      I have seen business after business go under as overhead costs pushed them into the grave. I see technological infrastructure much like building infrastructures, and view a company who renders their own products obsolete in a few years much in the same light as I would view a concrete contractor who deliberately designed his product to crumble in a few years, or copper pipe manufacturers who deliberately alloy their pipe so as to corrode and render it useless in a couple of years, rendering the business-man who failed to understand the nature of the company he was dealing with - with the problem of constantly replacing his infrastructures.

      Yes, my machine is not the latest whiz-bang model, but it is perfectly capable of playing movies... just not Microsoft movies, due to a completely synthetic restriction designed by Microsoft themselves.

      I am not the type to go out and buy all sorts of stuff I don't need. I consider that mostly the domain of cash-rich people and businesses.

      Consider yourself fortunate for maintaining employment that has sufficient excesses to subsidize continual replacement of still functioning infrastructure.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    5. Re:no ogg support by chawly · · Score: 1

      This seems a good approach to me. Just had to say it - my Scottish soul speaking, I think.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  144. I prefer the ipod flea by PagosaSam · · Score: 1
    --
    :q! Oh crap, not again...
  145. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I don't care about FM. I don't know why some people call it a feature on an MP3 player. If a person thought that FM was worthwhile, why buy an MP3 player? It's just not on any list of features I care about. I have a couple home theater recievers, I think they get their name because an AM/FM reciever is built in, but I never use them. Same goes for cars. I'd use the FM tuner on a car only because most radio makers don't bother to put a proper line-in on their radios.

    A screen is important though, but I doubt a .8" diagonal screen is going to be worthwhile on this cube player.

  146. But can it compete with the iFlea? [Hoax] by pinball10 · · Score: 1

    iFlea[http://www.layersmagazine.com/features/featu re_cs2/flea.htm%5D And does it have as many nifty accessories?

  147. With all the dorks on here, no comments about d6? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd expected more from you... (now there is a chance that the joke was made but not modded up to the point where it can easily be seen) but there were no instances of "d6" or "dice" on the two pages of comments thus far. You guys at slashdot.org have really slipped...

  148. opinions by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    lots of people are getting pissed at each other because of the fact they have different uses for different mp3 players.. i personally like having a radio in mine because it gives me the ability to listen to NPR and my albums during my commute.. different purposes for different people.. respect their opinions for what they choose and why.. personally, the ipod is very unpractical for me.. $250 for something that doesn't even have the simple technology of an FM receiver..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  149. Aztech is the original designer and manufacturer by sci50514 · · Score: 1, Informative
  150. How does it sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does no one care that with a S/N ratio of 50dB that this thing is only a couple of orders of magnitude worse sounding than an 8-track?

  151. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by fermion · · Score: 1
    They did shrink it about 20%. It is impressive that they fit a display and radio in that space. Everyone is harping on the file system, but that is code, not space. The iPod Shuffle, as well as most USB memory sticks, actually has a file system, just not used for music.

    There are many annoying things about it. The dongle has been mentioned. It is USB 1.1, which makes little sense, with maximum speed of 6 Mb/s. By far the most annoying thing is that it is only rated for 8 hours playing MP3 content. I assume that it will work on non-windows devices, but it is not specified as such.

    The nice thing is that it seems one can use the device to transfer and play music, none of that annoying iPod type hiding and mangling of the files. I wonder if they are going to tie this to the walmart music service and market it like the ipod. Doing so would make a lot of sense.

    In the end, a 1 gb memory stick it cheaper than this toy, and the form factor of the iPod. Even the sony, though twice as big and more expensive, seem to have some advantages. And I am hesitant to buy a product from a company that cannot produce a corporate web site that does not look a it is promoted a cheap toy or art exhibit.

    Anyway, dongles are so 20th century. if they were going with slow transfer, they should have gone bluetooth.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  152. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

    I suppose I could write a script that I could run before and after syncing the shuffle to put the songs whose play counts have changed into a "recent shuffled" playlist, but I think I've already spent way too much time on fine-tuning my iTunes settings.

    Or you could let somebody do it for you! :)

    http://www.dougscripts.com/itunes/scripts/ss.php?s p=updateshufflelastplayed

    Haven't used it yet, but something you might want to check out. Looks like it does exactly what you're talking about doing.

    Assuming this script works, thanks Google!

  153. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by VidEdit · · Score: 1

    Well, I like audio entertainment. So I consider radio and pre-recorded playback two sides of a coin just as a CD player in a car comes with an AM/FM radio. I don't think many people would opt for a CD only player in their car nor do I really want a portable player that doesn't have a radio. It is a personal preference, though, and I just wish Apple would give us the option--after all, the chip set in the shuffle has built in FM radio support (and screen support, and WMA support)!

    PS, I'm not a big fan for WMA, but more options are better than fewer.

    --
  154. Let me correct it for you by Shin+Chan · · Score: 1

    m-i-l-l-i-m-e-t-e-r

    --
    Proud owner of BOT2K3 [ bot2k3.net ]
  155. Classic MP3 Player by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    ummm... it was made small so it's "Good to Go"?

  156. heh, by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    I just copied it from your comment.

    1. Re:heh, by Shin+Chan · · Score: 1

      Heh, also. Try google, one inch = 25.4 millimeters. The guy is about right with the inches ;-)

      --
      Proud owner of BOT2K3 [ bot2k3.net ]
  157. It has FM Radio as well! by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "And hey, since Wal-mart is selling this, I think it might just give the iPod a run for its money."

    That's modded funny? That's pretty insightful to me. I think if the price comes down a bit, it'll sure give the iPod Shuffle a run for its money. On price, if Walmart wants to be it, it will.

    Besides, with a built in FM tuner, even the technologically inept can use it until they figure out what an MP3 is. That's a definate Walmart winner. That feature alone makes is a definate Rio killer. It also has 5 hours more play time than the iPod Shuffle, weighs less than iPS, and actually comes in color (white is so 2004, unless you like being mugged).

    The jury is out on iPod killer status, but I have to say one thing. It is pretty sexy, and a definate conversation starter (for geeks at least). If it goes hits $110 or less, I'd probably get it.

    --
    I8-D
  158. Smallest? Hah! by mblase · · Score: 1

    It's still nowhere near as tiny as the iPod Flea!

  159. Aztech? StationZ? by wiml · · Score: 1

    The firmware (which you can download from MobiBlu's website) has "StationZ" and "MP3PZ" scattered all through it. So I'm guessing the hardware is pretty closely related to the StationZ "pendant" MP3 players. Unfortunately I'm not leet enough to recognize what cpu it's using from a hex dump, so I can't guess anything more from the firmware file. (FYI, 'strings' only gets about half of the text in the file, since the rest is in UTF16 or some other 2-byte character set.)

  160. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by ninjagin · · Score: 1
    I'd agree that FM is probably not that vital to the product feature list, not only for yourself, but others. Given how little room it must take up inside the device, though, why not add it?

    Myself, I go to the FM side of the dial for pretty much one thing only -- the FM-stereo simulcast of my local PBS station. When I can't sit in front of the TeeVee for the News Hour (w. Jim Lehrer), this handy broadcast lets me get my nesw and info nonetheless.

    Granted, my use (and admittedly the availability of FM stereo simulcasts of your local PBS station) may not be terribly common, but if there's one slice of FM that I use every day, that'd be the one.

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  161. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by argent · · Score: 1

    I'm using a list called "good weighted" that's 3-star-or-better songs from Weighted, then for the shuffle I'm extracting the least-played several hundred of those. That way I get a lot of stuff from "Unambient" on the shuffle, and there's enough of that most of my shuffle stuff has had 5 plays or fewer, and it's still got some weighted ratings.

    Now I'm wishing the shuffle had a "skip this but mark it as played" button. :)

    Apple, you listening?

  162. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Ogg is technically superior, it requires more cycles to decode and thus drains batteries faster compared to playing mp3s.

  163. Why are we all troll rated? by elucido · · Score: 0

    Actually, I think its important to ask where your product is made. The cold war is over? The economic war is just beginning, we are in a global economy now. If you want to keep your job, shop in your best interest.

  164. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

    Supposedly, the firmware on this thing can be upgraded to support more music formats. Maybe the manufacturer will release a patch, or perhaps the hacking community will take care of it once they get their eager little hands on a firmware binary.

  165. Robowhine: no ogg support by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    I hate to point this out, but the article did say that it was an MP3 player. :-) My turntable won't play compact discs, either.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  166. The World's Most by drnoi · · Score: 1

    Considering how small it is, it will soon become The World's Most Lost MP3 player.

  167. Build it into a hat? by anubi · · Score: 1
    And run it on solar power?

    Somehow, I am thinking of the type of hat which has the little strap under the chin that keeps it from blowing off, and along part of the strap is the piece which is for the ear. Maybe incorporate some of the noise canceling technology used by those noise cancelling headsets while you are at it.

    This idea is now posted on Slashdot...! Its now Prior Technology posted in a Public Forum... with time stamp.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  168. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you're a music expert or sound engineer, you're not going to hear the difference between a reasonably high quality mp3 and ogg or any other high quality format. shush* No, i dont care what you say - you're not. Lots of people claim they can, but when it's put to the test they cant.

  169. the quarter sized smallest mp3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just search worlds smallest mp3 player on google and look at the second result ...lol

    was debating getting this a year ago, but went with the newer yepps cause of 42 hours of battery on 1 AA and ogg support. not to mention fm recording, line in, and a onboard mic.

    this looks ok but for size, the yepp yp-mt6z kills it on features, also kills the shuffle too.

    and there is no ipod killer, no company is stupid enough to waste as much money on marketing as apple has

  170. Cons by SirLestat · · Score: 1

    I was reading the review and in the cons section it says: "No DRM Support". I don't see that as a con, but more like a pro. Who need DRM

  171. Ogg Vorbis is inferior to MP3 for portability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    [huge colin wrote:] Ogg Vorbis is technically superior to MP3, so if I have a choice (and I often do), I'll take a Vorbis. I therefore am not interested in any player that doesn't play it.


    No, Ogg Vorbis not technically superior.

    Ogg Vorbis stores data in floating-point format, which is fine for computer CPUs that are equipped with a floating-point co-processor. However, supporting an extra processor sucks up more energy and reduces battery life. Otherwise, without the co-processor, the floating point calculations would have to be performed in software, which would impact performance.

    MP3 uses only integers, and so is ideal for portable, battery-saving systems.

    1. Re:Ogg Vorbis is inferior to MP3 for portability by huge+colin · · Score: 1

      No, Ogg Vorbis not technically superior.
      ...
      MP3 uses only integers, and so is ideal for portable, battery-saving systems.


      Ogg Vorbis is not a power-saving technology, weight-saving measure, or air freshener, so it shouldn't be a surprise if it doesn't help out in those areas. It's an audio compression scheme, and it compresses audio better than MP3, which is exactly what it was designed to do.

  172. NOT the world's smallest!!! by shaen · · Score: 1

    This matter was solved on engadget a few weeks ago. DAH-1500 24mm x 24mm x 24mm = 13824mm^3 BenQ Joybee 102r 41mm x 41mm x 8mm = 13448mm^3

  173. The Cons? by horza · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two of the four 'Cons' in the review are:
    It's Tiny
    No DRM Support

    Surely in the wrong column?

    Phillip.

  174. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by ctczar · · Score: 0

    Sure, it has a screen, but it doesn't seem like you can actually see more than 3 characters at a time... The only thing that works for is scrolling through FM stations... Useful, but not practical. The Nomad MuVo line is just as small as the Shuffle, with all the above features.

  175. Cool, but... by tattoi.nobori · · Score: 1

    Decent price for a GB audio player, cool form factor, evidently very portable... ^_^ However, I have serious doubts about the sound quality of the device. Obviously the internal amp isn't going to drive a big pair of cans like those available from AKG or Grado, but has anybody tried listening to it with a decent pair of in-ears, eg. Etymotics or some such? I'd be interested to read what you think...

  176. Uh, not the smallest. by ggruschow · · Score: 1
    BenQ clearly had a smaller player out before mobiBLU released the DAH-1500.

    DAH-1500 dimensions: 24mm h x 24mm w x 24mm d = 13,284mm^3
    Joybee 102R approx dimensions: 41mm diameter x 8mm depth = 10,562mm^3

    Of course the Joybee 102R lacks a screen and radio, and they haven't upgraded to larger capacities.. but it's clearly smaller.

  177. hmmm rebadged? by blymn · · Score: 1

    Looks amazingly similar to a JNC product here http://www.jnc-digital.com/Eng/, check the SSF-8002/8005/8100 model out.

  178. Battery? by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

    Built-in battery. Remember the fallout after Apple released their first gen iPods with built-in batteries? This is essentially a disposable device.

  179. Yeah, Firehazards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like how their manual for it warns you that leaving it plugged in longer than its recomemded charging time may result it in it bursting into flames.
    And with 1 gig and USB 1.1 i would worry about it bursting into flames before the damn song transfer finishes!

  180. MobiBlu compared to Apple iPod shuffle Photos by i4u · · Score: 1

    photos of shuffle and dah-1500
    http://www.i4u.com/article3863.html

    New MobiBlu DAH-1500 review on I4U
    http://www.i4u.com/section-viewarticle-101.html

  181. Okay how about this... by LEX+LETHAL · · Score: 1

    The square design seems a tad... inconvienient. How about the same idea and functionality in the form of one of those wafer-thin calculators. They have a power source and a display.

    It looks like a great idea, just an odd form factor.

  182. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by tsioc · · Score: 1

    actually, I can... unless they are encoded at a high bitrate. What's nice about Vorbis is that it you can get get equal or better quality at a lower bitrate.

  183. New accessories... by fourharpoon · · Score: 1

    Good news for all world's smallest MP3 player owners. We understand your trouble in operating the device. But troubled no more, as we have provided an external control for it. With it's 10cm x 10cm x 2cm dimension, we guarantee you will be able to distinguish between play and stop button.
    Available now at ebay.

    ~So much for the smallest mp3 player

  184. Why is it..... by VectorSC · · Score: 1

    Why is it every time I read about some new techno gidgit that going to revolutionize our lives, I think about the Japanese? Once you run out of coolness in your toys, you get things like Karaoke.

  185. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ogg Vorbis was never designed to work on small devices. Both AAC and WMA, on the other hand, is, and sounds at least as good (moreso the former) if not better at the same bitrate. So go ahead and keep your "it's OSS/Underdog/Nerdy so I have to have a completely impractical product requirement" attidue, the rest of us will get a life, and a decent digital audio player. Sorry for the rant, narrow minded geeks annoy the hell outta me.

  186. Re:Cube? Cube! The Borg! Resistance is futile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will be assimilated!

    Because it is a Borg cube obviously. A tiny one, but it will grow bigger and bigger every time it assimiltes a new user and finally conquer the universe. Very evil plan, so beware!

  187. These have been out in Korea for at least 3 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My buddy bought one right when we got here for the summer. It's surprisingly easy to use, has phenomonal sound quality, an amazing 1-cable interface for power, data, and audio, and comes with a little rubber condom-type thing that only surrounds the edges and corners. The condom lets you drop it with no fear of damage and eliminates any discomfort it might cause in your pocket. Also, for the person who complained of pain in the leg, in Korea everyone wears mp3 players around their necks. It's sort of a techno-necklace. My buddy managed to bargain his 512mb one down to $210...so $130 in the states is shocking to me. Now I'm not so sure I'm going to blow a bunch of cash on one that plays 8 hours of video as well as mp3 in a package only marginally larger.

  188. Lower Volume by yellowalienbaby · · Score: 1

    Looking at the volume of this compared with the iPod shuffle, I assume the headphones are slightly larger to compensate? .... ?

    --
    Darwin Hawking Blackmore
  189. Buy from Walmart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And help China make the necessary upgrades for its military. When are we going to see that Walmart is really a Chinese company? While all of you are dilly-dallying around the Middle East, The Chinese will march right into your back door. Just like the terrorists were able to strike while the great defender of our frontier(Customs) is harassing people for not using credit cards and not staying at fancy hotels while out of the country. You all are toast.

  190. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by huge+colin · · Score: 1

    You're quite right. I can't hear the difference, and I really don't care. I'm not a sound engineer, but I am an engineer. I care about quality and good design, which Vorbis represents.

  191. Re:Almost the exact same volume as the iPod Shuffl by huge+colin · · Score: 1

    So go ahead and keep your "it's OSS/Underdog/Nerdy so I have to have a completely impractical product requirement" attidue, the rest of us will get a life, and a decent digital audio player.

    Care to explain what's 'impractical' about the Ogg Vorbis requirement? Plenty of players can handle Vorbis; it's only crappy ones that can't. Apparently, it's not only practical, but it makes economic sense to include it.

    Meanwhile, I've spent a comparatively small amount of money on a player with more features and capacity than I'd ever need.