Slashdot Mirror


Gentoo 2005.1, Experimental Live CD Released

safeness writes "Gentoo 2005.1 was released yesterday. Included in its release is an additional experimental LiveCD with the long awaited graphical installer. Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo! Get it here!" And darthcamaro writes "Hard to tell from the change log what's new ... but this story on internetnews.com notes new installation hardware support and WiFi."

347 comments

  1. Yeah yeah. by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo!

    Indeed! A couple more features and I'll be ready to switch back to Fedora.

    1. Re:Yeah yeah. by angst7 · · Score: 1

      No doubt... I read this like three times to make sure I had it right.

      --
      StrategyTalk.com, PC Game Forums
    2. Re:Yeah yeah. by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously safeness (the story poster) is a person who subscribes to the philosophy that "less is more".

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Yeah yeah. by empaler · · Score: 2, Funny

      If not in features, then in sense.

    4. Re:Yeah yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doh!

    5. Re:Yeah yeah. by Millyways · · Score: 1

      Maybe the abiltiy to boot Gentoo from a live CD if you happen to be at a friends house means your friends no longer have to switch to Gentoo?

      Seems to make sense to me.

  2. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. If the Gentoo 2005.1 Experimental Live CD was combined with Google Maps then that could be very interesting.

    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, why?

    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know there had to be a why :(

  3. Typo? by fiji · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo!" should perhaps be "Now there's one less reason for your friends NOT to switch to Gentoo!".

    -ben

    1. Re:Typo? by Eberlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably not a typo. There's a common thought that the gentoo folks are pretty "hardcore" about the OS. That whole stage1 compile everything from scratch, configure everything with vi, use magnets to place the linux kernel bits on the HDD, and all that wonderful stuff. A graphical installer almost defeats the purpose of being 1337, after all.

      I hear you learn lots about Linux that way. I wouldn't know, I run ubuntu. I'd like to maybe try it one day (or week or month...it's a slow machine) for the experience but for now, mine work relatively well.

      So yeah, if the draw is to be difficult, complex, and 1337, then making it easier would make some people NOT switch to gentoo.

    2. Re:Typo? by sbennett · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hear you learn lots about Linux that way.

      No, you learn lots about following instructions that way. Of course, it's still useful knowledge that a lot of people could benefit from gaining.

    3. Re:Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't it be "Now there is one more reason for your friends to not switch to gentoo." It seems to make better sense like this.

    4. Re:Typo? by dratox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I did my first gentoo install only 2 months ago(by the book), and in that time learned more about linux than from running it an entire year before with other (more user-friendly distros). You do learn alot, even by the book, because it lets you see the inards more than some distros, and forces you to see how what does what and why it's there. This is actually one of the main reasons I DID use gentoo, rather than something like fedora 4.

    5. Re:Typo? by agraupe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, that's not entirely true. You could say the same thing about the apprentice system, which obviously does work. Sure you don't become a linux 1337 hax0r over night, but, having done a gentoo install, I could see what I had done wrong with other linux systems. As you do the install, you see how things fit together, and getting from the fresh-install to working-desktop stage is better still, in terms of learning. Because X.org wasn't automatically configured, I learned how to do it by the gentoo guide, so when something did screw up with it, I could go back in and fix it. Was this the only way to get this information? No. Would a gentoo install teach you much if you're already a knowledgeable linux/UNIX user? Again, no. For those of us not in that category, the gentoo install proves to be educational, and it ends up with a system that is customized to your liking.

    6. Re:Typo? by jtwJGuevara · · Score: 4, Informative

      For instance, the gentoo installation was my first experience manually editing fstab, compiling a kernel, editing various files in /etc by hand, so and so forth. Installing gentoo is not so much a learning experience than it is a "frame of mind" changer. It completely forced me out of using gui configs to the point where I now prefer to go edit files by hand. Of course, you could always go edit files by hand in other distributions as well, but gentoo (moreso the gentoo community and documention) is more supportive of it and explains it much better than other distributions that I've seen. (Disclaimer, I haven't used debian, so I can't speak of its community and documentation).

    7. Re:Typo? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      Liking Gentoo has nothing to do with "being l33t" as you call it. Some people just like it when their config files are not being screwed up permanently by some GUI config tool that doesn't know how to preserve comments or advanced settings (the ones not accesible through the GUI). Some people also like not being forced to install KDE or Gnome (yeah, I am one of these people who doesn't want their Linux look almost like Windows, I like my environment a bit more customized and efficient) just because the compile time option was turned on when the package maintainers compiled all the packages for which using GTK/QT/KDE/Gnome was optional. Gentoo is very easy to use once you get to know it and it allows you to stay away from the mainstream desktop environment with little effort compared to other solutions like rolling your own distro.

    8. Re:Typo? by agraupe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree completely on that one. I can say that, for the most part, gentoo documentation is the most complete that I can find for any distro. The community is usually helpful, but can be slightly hostile if you don't RTFM and ask a stupid question. I've used Debian, and Ubuntu is now my distro of choice for most things (it's just less effort than gentoo, although I still use gentoo on my main box). The Debian community, I've found, is very elitist, and also unbelievably hostile to Debian offshoot distros like Ubuntu and Knoppix. Debian is a good option for other platforms, like PPC, because it is a competent distro in most respects. That being said, use the gentoo documentation.

    9. Re:Typo? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      The strengths of Gentoo seem to be its emerge system and its documentation. I think emerge beats FreeBSD's ports simply because so many people are using it that it is broken less often and the USE flags are a more consistent way of handling options than ports uses (it often varies port to port and sometimes you have things like multiple ports, i.e. portX-with-gui portX-without-gui). But I think FreeBSD still has it beat on documentation. Anyway, I am really glad linux finally got Gentoo because it really does help you learn how the system works.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    10. Re:Typo? by pfrCalif · · Score: 1

      Actually its 'nano' that they have the installed by default for some reason, not vi. so I'm not sure if that moves it up or down the leet scale.

    11. Re:Typo? by LordoftheWoods · · Score: 1

      No, you learn lots about following instructions that way.

      Disagree.

      Yes, you are following instructions, but the point is you are actually doing it and will NOT (well, hopefully) need those instructions in the future. Unless you are the inventor, your knowledge about any technology is derived from (surprise!) other people telling you about it, whether it be explicity through instructions for a certain task, general usage information in manpages, or hints about where you've screwed up in error messages (the list goes on). Manpages may be more 'hardcore' than instructions, and error messages may be more 1337 than manpages, but you learn about the subject through the experience nonetheless.

    12. Re:Typo? by LordoftheWoods · · Score: 2, Insightful

      nano (the free clone of non-free pico) is much more straightforward than vi. So it moves it down on the 1337 scale and up on the is-this-even-plausible-for-a-newbie scale.

    13. Re:Typo? by sigloiv · · Score: 1
      I completely agree with this as well. Before Gentoo, (in Slackware and Fedora Core 3) I had always tried to do everything with some extremely specialized KDE app that lacked functionality. With Gentoo I learned how to compile a kernel, edit an fstab, the file heirarchy, and so much more.

      Plus, I got a completely optimized system that runs highly up-to-date experimental software. Gentoo is just plain unbelievable when it comes to its package system: Portage. USE flags and keywords and mirrors and it's crazy huge distfiles database. It's all too much to handle.

      Now, I personally am not crazy about Gentoo's documentation like most people are, but I do love the Gentoo-Wiki. For the most part it has articles about what people care about--the real world stuff like ATI or Nvidia drivers. Maybe setting up a home Samba server, that sort of thing.

      Basically, I've used Gentoo for a year and a half and have never looked back.

      --
      Software is like sex. It's better when it's free. -Linus Torvalds
    14. Re:Typo? by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      I agree. After installing it, you feel a lot more comfortable tinkering around with it, especially once you realize it would be quite difficult to break it so it would be un-fixable. Although all distributions are open and can be tinkered with, Gentoo practically leaves it's doors open inviting you to do so (su access only of course).

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    15. Re:Typo? by blippblopp · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm always a little irritated that vi is not available when I do a stage1 compile and I have to use the user-friendly nano editor instead. I sure feel lame afterwards.

    16. Re:Typo? by l_bratch · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      I can safely say as a user of Gentoo, that since I switched to it from using Fedora Core for several months, and then Ubuntu for a few weeks, I have learnt far more about Linux since using Gentoo.

      Sure you have to follow the instructions to the letter the first time, but that's how you learn. I can now do the install without reading the guide, which is evidence of an intimate knowledge of how Linux works that other distros couldn't give me.

    17. Re:Typo? by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, amen. Gentoo is a great OS and with the release of a live CD version of it, I can say it's only going to get more fun. I've been wanting a form like this for awhile, mainly just to boot up without having to partition my harddrive... So it's going to be great to have.

      --
      "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
    18. Re:Typo? by Willeh · · Score: 1
      Magnets?

      Luxury!

      In my day, we had to manually create bytecode using only pen and paper, then engrave the resulting sequences on a piece of rolled copper using our fingernails. Then we had to have some cold grits, and before bedtime our uncle Linus would sodomize us with a plastic penguin.

      --
      Will wank off Linus Torvalds for fame.
  4. Now there's one less reason for your friends to sw by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo!

    Is is just me, or are the /. editors at it again?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  5. wireless? by lakerdonald · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hmm...so I might actually be able to run stage 1 now? *crosses fingers that his card's on the list*

    1. Re:wireless? by kernel_dan · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you are able to get wireless in Knoppix, then you can download stage1 and the portage snapshot from the internet and install from there. There is no need for the Gentoo LiveCD to install.

      --

      Illegal? Samir, This is America.
    2. Re:wireless? by lakerdonald · · Score: 0

      Which is still a problem when your wireless card doesn't work with Knoppix...

  6. This is going to be good... by Dan667 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let the Gentoo vs. everything else flamewar begin!

    1. Re:This is going to be good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cheese on toast tastes way better than Gentoo does.

    2. Re:This is going to be good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # emerge flamewar
      Calculating dependencies
      emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "flamewar".

      Dammit, I thought that was a feature...

    3. Re:This is going to be good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac OS X 10.4.2 feels much snappier than Gentoo.

    4. Re:This is going to be good... by w98 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I use gentoo 2005.0, and have used gentoo since one of their 2003 releases. Did that make me a linux expert? No. Using about a dozen different distros since the early 90's has sure helped though!

      I agree that following a step-by-step list of instructions to install something does not make someone an expert. Heck, I can buy something in a box from IKEA, assemble it per their instructions, and have a functional piece of furniture, but that hardly makes me a furniture craftsman "expert".

      Of course, if the user goes through the installation walk-through and checks other command line options, and WHY things happen in a certain order, then of *course* it will make a HUGE difference on the skill level they end up with.

      So I don't use gentoo for the "prestige" of saying "I use an OS I compiled from source", I use gentoo 'cause it's a comfortable distro for me, it's nice and fast for what I need, it supports all of the hardware I currently need it for, and that's that.

      # emerge mytwocents

    5. Re:This is going to be good... by bicho · · Score: 1

      it's also easier to catch than a gentoo.

      --

      errera hunamum ets
    6. Re:This is going to be good... by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

      But Gentoo has less calories if you set your build flags to -O9

    7. Re:This is going to be good... by Samari711 · · Score: 1

      !!!Error: the opinions/myobnoxiousbeliefs conflicts with another package.
      !!!both can't be installed on the same system together.
      !!!Please use 'emerge --pretend' to determine blockers.

      --

      I never said I was smart, I just said I was smarter than you

    8. Re:This is going to be good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean Mac OS X.4.2?

    9. Re:This is going to be good... by LordoftheWoods · · Score: 1

      I believe you mean -Os. -O9 would just be an uber vesion of -O3 which optimizes for speed, making it faster but larger (more calories).

    10. Re:This is going to be good... by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 1

      How exactly do you measure 'snappiness'?

      I'd say that Gentoo (what I'm using while typing this) leads the competition in quickness, 'right there'-ness, and definitely, brightness.

      I'd say Gentoo is also probably the most rubbery OS I've ever used.

      --
      World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
    11. Re:This is going to be good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK...

      for starters,: everything else (tm) has had graphical installers for ages, but on the other hand everything else takes even more time to compile...

    12. Re:This is going to be good... by 5plicer · · Score: 1

      According to the 2003 Apple Publications Style Guide, it's Mac OS X version 10.4.2 (v10.4.2) for the first occurrence, and Mac OS X v10.4.2 thereafter.

      --
      The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
  7. The difference a word makes... by travail_jgd · · Score: 0

    Can we change the blurb to read: "Now there's one less reason for your friends to not switch to Gentoo!"

    1. Re:The difference a word makes... by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      Can we change the blurb to read: "Now there's one less reason for your friends to not switch to Gentoo!"

      No, let's not split infinitives.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    2. Re:The difference a word makes... by iapetus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah. You clearly haven't tried the graphical installer yet, then. :P

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    3. Re:The difference a word makes... by thedustbustr · · Score: 1

      How about Now there's one more reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo...

      --
      This sig is false.
    4. Re:The difference a word makes... by zopf · · Score: 1

      We could pretend that he meant that your friends now don't even have to switch to Gentoo to experience its full splendor. Or we could just ignore the article completely.

      --
      Did you see the pool? They flipped the bitch!
    5. Re:The difference a word makes... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      why not?
      It's English, we can split it if we want to.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  8. Perhaps its only me... by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Funny

    but somehow, putting a CD with an "experimental Gentoo" Release on it into my computer sounds just as fascinating and fun as open hearth surgery in nanibia or landing a space shuttle with chocolade heathshields...

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:Perhaps its only me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      open hearth surgery

      Would you rather that the fireplace to be closed? I'd appreciate the warmth myself

    2. Re:Perhaps its only me... by RedWizzard · · Score: 4, Funny
      but somehow, putting a CD with an "experimental Gentoo" Release on it into my computer sounds just as fascinating and fun as open hearth surgery in nanibia or landing a space shuttle with chocolade heathshields...
      Oh, I don't know. I'm kind of fascinated about just what "open hearth surgey" and "heathshields" are.
    3. Re:Perhaps its only me... by hungrygrue · · Score: 1

      Open hearth sugery? Well, I'd imagine that performing any kind of repair on your fireplace would be made more difficult if it were closed off.

    4. Re:Perhaps its only me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That whole sentence was amazing. It makes CmdrTaco look like the National Spelling Bee champion, and not just in nerdiness.

    5. Re:Perhaps its only me... by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's only the installer that's experimental. The actual stuff that installs on your computer will only be expiremental if you go with the "~arch" branch.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    6. Re:Perhaps its only me... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 5, Funny
      but somehow, putting a CD with an "experimental Gentoo" Release on it into my computer sounds just as fascinating and fun as open hearth surgery in nanibia or landing a space shuttle with chocolade heathshields...

      Are you kidding? The People's Imaginary Republic of Nanibia has some kick ass hearth surgeons. They came by Mom's place yesterday. We thought that fireplace was done for but after a double Chimney bypass it was roaring again we were all making Space Shuttle Heatshield Smores in celebration.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    7. Re:Perhaps its only me... by br0ck · · Score: 3, Funny
    8. Re:Perhaps its only me... by DataPath · · Score: 1

      I don't know about open hearth surgery, but I could use some heathshields to go with my 3 musketeers

      --
      Inconceivable!
    9. Re:Perhaps its only me... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, as African states go Namibia isn't half bad. Atleast they haven't had a major civil war in a while.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    10. Re:Perhaps its only me... by Surt · · Score: 1

      A round of applause, that is the funniest post I've read in a month. If I wasn't banned from moderation, you'd be getting overmoderated for funny.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    11. Re:Perhaps its only me... by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . a space shuttle with chocolade heathshields...

      Eureka! Bombard it with Heath bars! The shuttle program is saved!

      KFG

    12. Re:Perhaps its only me... by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Mod parent +6 Funny.

    13. Re:Perhaps its only me... by TeknoHog · · Score: 0

      If you're afraid of the experimental, stay away from Gentoo. You might try Debian instead; though I think lately they too have gone totally rad with bleeding edge things like Linux 2.0.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    14. Re:Perhaps its only me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shouldn't that be "experimenthal Genthoo"?

    15. Re:Perhaps its only me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a chocolade heathshield around my hearth, you insensitive clod!

    16. Re:Perhaps its only me... by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1
      heathshields

      I can't tell if that's a typo or not. Either way: Bravo.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    17. Re:Perhaps its only me... by danbeck · · Score: 1

      How do people like this actually make it past the power button?

    18. Re:Perhaps its only me... by K-Mile · · Score: 1

      I'm also quite fascinated by this place called Nanibia...

    19. Re:Perhaps its only me... by NZBeeMan · · Score: 1
      I'm also quite fascinated by this place called Nanibia...

      It's in Hafrica aint it?

    20. Re:Perhaps its only me... by KingPunk · · Score: 0

      you're really smart, considering its on a LiveCD for the experimental and the regular one is just as it always is. the learn to RTFA. -kingpunk

  9. A Gentoo LiveCD? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No way in hell am I going to recompile the OS every time I boot up. Do I look like I have that kind of time in my life? /me checks posting history.

    Never mind. Carry on.

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    1. Re:A Gentoo LiveCD? by zerried · · Score: 1

      However, you do sound like an idiot.

  10. Discrepancy by hamfactorial · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There seems to be an obvious mismatch between the summary, which states that the release includes the long-awaited (is it really?) graphical installer, and the article which says that the installer is not included. What gives?

    --
    Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future? Holy shit!
    1. Re:Discrepancy by dsd · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article text is confusing. There are 2 "releases" at hand.

      1. Gentoo 2005.1 - a normal official release, updated packages and installation media but nothing mind-blowingly new.

      2. An experimental LiveCD which boots into a graphical environment and includes an early version of the upcoming Gentoo Linux Installer.

      The Installer "preview" is not included on the standard 2005.1 media.

    2. Re:Discrepancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      the release includes the long-awaited (is it really?)

      Yes. By the time anything in Gentoo's finished compiling it's really really long-awaited.

    3. Re:Discrepancy by hamfactorial · · Score: 1

      Thank you for clearing that up dsd, I appreciate it. The installer seems like a nice tool to have for generic installations, but I wonder how it handles more abstract cases like RAID and NFS mounted stuff. In any case, I haven't had to install Gentoo in quite some time, but any way to make it easier on new users is appreciated. Lord knows there is an abundancy of installation questions in #gentoo on FreeNode, and not enough people to field them all at once.

      --
      Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future? Holy shit!
    4. Re:Discrepancy by glowworm · · Score: 3, Informative

      And when you research the Gentoo site it mentions the Installation tool/live CD is in the experimental fork on the mirrors. Checking there shows the 2005.0 version not the 2005.1 version the article suggests.

      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
  11. try lunar by sofar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    There's good source distro's out there that already have decent installers for a long time. Try lunar:

    http://lunar-linux.org

    Lunar is an excellent distro meant for savy linux users, and mostly named for a far easier install procedure than gentoo.

    1. Re:try lunar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I measure time by the lunar calendar when compiling Gentoo, does that count?

  12. And for those of us with a current gentoo install by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

    Are there directions on performing a profile updgrade avaliable?

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  13. Re:Now there's one less reason for your friends to by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1

    Again? When did they stop?

  14. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by corrosive_nf · · Score: 0

    Gates is envious of a distro that takes days to compile everything?

  15. Happy Geek. by Onimaru · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Looks spiffy. I'm seriously a geek in heaven lately...it seems that now my biggest problem is choosing between all the pretty, easy, functional linux installs I could be running and resisting the urge to "catch 'em all."

    I do find myself occasionally wishing, though, that some of the effort being put into endlessly fragmenting and repackaging linux could be put into taking some of the great apps available and turning them from "good, functional, usable, and fast" into "droolingly beautiful and slick as Elvis' hair."

    --
    adam b.
    1. Re:Happy Geek. by nicxz · · Score: 0

      Looks spiffy. I'm seriously a geek in heaven lately

      Say hello to Natalie Portman for me.

    2. Re:Happy Geek. by zbrimhall · · Score: 0

      "droolingly beautiful and slick as Elvis' hair."

      Ew.

    3. Re:Happy Geek. by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      Install e17, and all the luciousness that comes with.

    4. Re:Happy Geek. by Cocodude · · Score: 1
      Looks spiffy. I'm seriously a geek in heaven lately...it seems that now my biggest problem is choosing between all the pretty, easy, functional linux installs I could be running and resisting the urge to "catch 'em all."

      How do you get 20 Linux distributions onto a tiny hard drive? You Pok-em-on.

      <sigh>

  16. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (G)ates (E)nvy's

    /me cries

    What the fuck? What kind of brain damage can cause a person to use an apostrophe in a verb? ENVIES. Did you not learn these very simple rules in first grade?

    P.S. I know it was a feeble attempt at a joke, but gentoo is a type of penguin.

  17. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by hungrygrue · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is a species of penguin.http://www.siec.k12.in.us/~west/proj/pengu ins/gentoo.html Specifically, a very fast swimming penguin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentoo_Penguin

  18. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (O)99
    (O)ptimized

  19. etc-update STILL sucks by SuperBanana · · Score: 0, Troll

    Call me when etc-update doesn't blow goats.

    Anyone who has ever upgraded a package that keeps many files in /etc...say, webmin- knows exactly what I'm talking about. Even if the contents of a file in /etc haven't changed since they were put there by a package, I'm given no indication of this by etc-update, and I have to approve each one of DOZENS of files by hand. There's no simple facility to even say "update all the config files in this directory". This one example gives you an idea of how bad things are overall.

    There are some X alternatives, but guess what? I don't run X on my gentoo box, because I don't want to wait for 16 hours for X to compile. Also, the boys who maintain portage have been refusing to allow these third-party tools into the portage tree because "it might confuse users" and the tool (in use and active maintenance for 2 years by a sizable group) isn't "proven".

    I posted about how much gentoo config handling sucks in the last slashdot story about gentoo, and I'll keep doing so until they do something to fix it. I refuse to recommend gentoo to anyone anymore on this basis; gentoo has not matured in the slightest as a distribution since its first release or two.

    1. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by warbital · · Score: 1, Informative

      use dispatch-conf then.

    2. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by jj110888 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      stop trolling and start use dispatch-conf (included in portage).

      IIRC, most of the alternatives that don't use X are simple scripts (like dispatch-conf and etc-update are anyways), so why make a whole package for something u can just slip into ~/bin (or w/e is in your $PATH) ?

    3. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by TorKlingberg · · Score: 1

      Use dispatch-conf instead. Still not perfect, but a lot better than etc-update.

    4. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by pHZero · · Score: 1

      Check out dispatch-conf It provides the functionality you're looking for as well as version control of old configuration files :)

    5. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by The_DOD_player · · Score: 1

      Have a look at dispatch-conf. It's much more intelligent than etc-update. Donno why it isnt default yet.

    6. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by DavidBlewett · · Score: 1

      Use dispatch-conf. It can be configured to use RCS to keep previous versions, and automatically merge trivial changes.

    7. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by ajayrockrock · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I posted about how much gentoo config handling sucks in the last slashdot story about gentoo, and I'll keep doing so until they do something to fix it.

      Thanks for doing your part.

    8. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by UtucXul · · Score: 1

      While I agree that etc-update is pretty bad, there is a really nice alternative that is in portage: dispatch-conf. It is a pretty nice way to deal with differences in config files, and can use rcs on you config files, which is a really great idea.

    9. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by NetCow · · Score: 1

      I posted about how much gentoo config handling sucks in the last slashdot story about gentoo, and I'll keep doing so until they do something to fix it.

      They have, about 2 years ago. You just didn't happen to be, how should I put it... Informed? :)

      Use dispatch-conf, and voila, your psychiatric bill should diminish considerably (because we're definitely in agreement on etc-update sucking bigtime.)

    10. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by t35t0r · · Score: 1

      Mod down parent -3 as FUD:

      Call me when etc-update doesn't blow goats.

      use dispatch-conf instead, it doesn't blow as many goats as etc-update

      and I have to approve each one of DOZENS of files by hand.

      You have to update a dozen files by hand only if you emerge -avuDN world once in a blue moon. When this happens almost every existing package in your world file will have to be updated because the last time you updated was 6 months ago. Furthermore you can use package.mask or make your own script perl script (I made one in less than 25 lines) for upgrading only certain packages.

      There are some X alternatives, but guess what? I don't run X on my gentoo box, because I don't want to wait for 16 hours for X to compile.

      *FUD ALERT* There are binary packages that you can get from the official gentoo repositories for things like Xorg, KDE, Gnome, and openoffice. I always compile xorg because on my slowest machine, a celeron-m 1.3ghz laptop with 512mb ram compiles it in 45minutes.

      Also, the boys who maintain portage have been refusing to allow these third-party tools into the portage tree because "it might confuse users" and the tool (in use and active maintenance for 2 years by a sizable group) isn't "proven".

      Many gentoo developers and those who have access to the portage CVS maintain and add new ebuilds on a volunteer basis. Most of these people are not being paid to make Gentoo better. Like many other GPL distributions it relies on user support. I'm not exactly sure which 3rd party tools you're talking about. If you want something in portage (which no one else has time to take care of) I've never had a problem with posting a bug on bugs.gentoo.org, attaching an ebuild to the bug myself, and maintaining it as future versions are released.

      I refuse to recommend gentoo to anyone anymore on this basis; gentoo has not matured in the slightest as a distribution since its first release or two.

      Good!! We don't want non-contributors like you anyways. Gentoo is built by users for users, and if you don't want to help then STFU and use what is available or don't use it at all.

    11. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by joe_bruin · · Score: 1

      There's no simple facility to even say "update all the config files in this directory". This one example gives you an idea of how bad things are overall.

      Using etc-update, manually merge all the config files that you do NOT want to be replaced (ie, ones that you've modified). Now you're left with a list of all files that you don't want to manually merge, just overwrite. choose command -3 (it's right there in the menu above your command prompt). This will replace all the remaining config files with their new versions. -5 if you don't want to use "mv -i". Done.

      As for installing x, you could get a binary package of it from the gentoo servers, so all it would take is the time to download it.

      Thank you, come again.

    12. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by Preacher+X · · Score: 1
      You have obviously never read the documentation or the install guide, while applying more concentration than a trained monkey. At several places it is stated to run: CONFIG_PROTECT="-*" emerge when installing or updating to allow /etc configs to be updated without interaction.

      Granted if you were paying attention even then you realize that such an action causes configurations you have edited (such as port numbers in webmin) to be removed and overwritten during an update. It is for this reason that etc-update and protected configs exist.

      Additionally you may find the following link useful as it describes ways to modify the configuration of etc-update to automerge comment changes (most common) and CVS headers (also common).

      http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_etc-update


      On a parting note... Taken from Section 4a of the gentoo handbook located at:

      http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86 .xml?style=printable&full=1

      Code Listing 2: etc-update options

      Please select a file to edit by entering the corresponding number.
      (-1 to exit) (-3 to auto merge all remaining files)
      (-5 to auto-merge AND not use 'mv -i'):

      Seems to me that option -5 fromt he main etc-update prompt would take care of your "update all the config files in this directory" issue.

      Enjoy :)
      --
      "And the heathens with their ways of trickery and deceit shall not prevail over the will of the righteous"
    13. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. I just ruined my whole Gentoo install by running etc-update and doing a few automerges. Never again will I run etc-update. It doesn't seem to do anything anyway.

    14. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by IOOOOOI · · Score: 1
      There's no simple facility to even say "update all the config files in this directory". This one example gives you an idea of how bad things are overall.

      Wrong. You merge the files you need to, then you say "update all [the rest of] the files in this directory".

    15. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by jobsagoodun · · Score: 1
      Wrong. You merge the files you need to, then you say "update all [the rest of] the files in this directory".

      Its still an arseabout though. I've been running Gentoo for 2 years, but just had a go at SUSE9.3. Its brilliant! You just install it and it works right away!! ;-)

      I started using gentoo because I wanted to use 2.6 kernel and other features before the other distro's. Looks like they're a lot more up to date these days though.

    16. Re:etc-update STILL sucks by jownz · · Score: 1

      alias etc-update="dispatch-conf" :) now it's the default

  20. Poorly Chosen Language by SporkLand · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was browsing the screenshots of the new installer, and they looked nice. But as I was looking through them I saw reference to a "nazi-ish firewall". I'm not the type of person that is upset by this, but I can picture the people whose sensitivities would be offended by such a remark.

    Maybe they should switch nazi-ish for strict. I'm not trying to be overly critical but I'm sure there are people who would find the comparisons between an overly-strict computer and a group that baked people in ovens offensive.

    1. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by jj110888 · · Score: 1

      If your cd drive isn't supported by the livecd, then I think it tries to boot up but then drops you into the ash shell to 'fix your shit' (to use the gentoo livecds words). Personally, i consider the sense of humor a good thing :P

    2. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't make fun of Nazi's. My grandfather died in a Nazi prison camp.

      He fell out of a gaurd tower and broke his neck.

    3. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by ipapusha · · Score: 1

      Cut the political crap. If a person cooks someone for purposes of racial purification, then their label should, without a doubt, hold a negative connotation.

    4. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by metamatic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps by "nazi-ish firewall" they mean one that burns down your computer and blames it on Communists.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    5. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by siliconjunkie · · Score: 1

      If a person cooks someone for purposes of racial purification, then their label should, without a doubt, hold a negative connotation.

      Personally, I only cook someone with some fava beans and a nice chianti.

    6. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by adam613 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the firewall keeps Jews out. Or in. In that case, the term "Nazi-ish" would be correct.

    7. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      I think its more of a concern for the firewall's feelings. Either that or the feelings or someone who loves firewalls for all that they do.

    8. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But as I was looking through them I saw reference to a "nazi-ish firewall".

      You say that like Nazis are a bad thing.

    9. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe some words should be heard and used more often. If Nazi is used negatively to describe something, I'm all for it.

    10. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "baked people in ovens"

      Ah, when you say people, you mean Jews. Easy mistake to make. ;)

    11. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      "...I'm sure there are people who would find the comparisons between an overly-strict computer and a group that baked people in ovens offensive."

      I'm being totally pedantic here, but the ovens were used for the cremation of corpses, a practice that is common all over the world.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    12. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so those people can be uncomfortable.

      what is your point?

      i honestly dont care if other people feel comfortable when the originator never inteded to inflame.

      that just means they are oversensative and should not be paid attention to

    13. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find your nazi-ish political correctness offensive.

    14. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are people who would find the comparisons between an overly-strict computer and a group that baked people in ovens offensive.

      How about a little context? We (quite happily) tell children the fairy tale of Handsel and Gretel, where the evil witch tried to bake the children in an oven, but the children outwit her and shove the witch into the oven instead. Charming.

      Besides, sometimes I think those trying to get past the firewalls (spammers & crackers for starters) should be given the same level of contempt and/or mercy the Nazis gave to their victims.

      I'm sure there are more than a few days in which all of us wish we could do inhuman things to spammers...

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    15. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      What would be the most offensive to those other people: someone using the word nazi-ish, or someone referring to the Jews as 'people that were baked in ovens'?..

    16. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an ethnic minority oppressed by the Nazis as the Jews were. I'm now more oppressed by your words, you insensitive clod!

    17. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by hyfe · · Score: 1
      I'm not trying to be overly critical but I'm sure there are people who would find the comparisons between an overly-strict computer and a group that baked people in ovens offensive.

      I never could decide what was worse.

      1. People being offended by just about anything.
      2. People being offended on behalf of some imaginery extremely sensitive friend.
      3. People trying to be polite and nice pretending to take offensive on behalf of some imaginery friend, while they clearly were quite busy taking offense themselves.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    18. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're homosexual?

    19. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by SporkLand · · Score: 1

      I thought they were somtimes baking people alive. Although my actual studies of that history is lacking, which is probably more offensive to the people than the use of the term nazi-ish.

    20. Re:Poorly Chosen Language by SporkLand · · Score: 1

      I choose 1 or 3 for obvious reasons.

  21. posts like this just go to show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is for people who hate Microsoft, *BSD is for people who love unix.

    (PS: You're a retard.)

  22. cut -d 'daniel robbins' by bad_outlook · · Score: 1

    is there any mention of anything different in the low documentation in regards to GPL compliance with all of Daniel Robbins servio code? I was concerned that something may be unshippable because of his current position as a MicorSoft developer.

    1. Re:cut -d 'daniel robbins' by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that Daniel Robbins hasn't had any code responsibility
      for over a year. In any case, they've gone to great efforts to convey to the
      gentoo using population that Dan's new position at MS in no way encumbers any
      parts of the gentoo distro.

      If you know something they don't, you'd better speak up.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    2. Re:cut -d 'daniel robbins' by bad_outlook · · Score: 1

      Good to know, I assume that to be the case, but damn, if he didn't make a huge distro and then just detach himself from it. He must be humble and proud.

    3. Re:cut -d 'daniel robbins' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like bankrupt and stressed-out, but we do thank him greatly for his efforts.

  23. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gentoo. Gen. Too. Generation. Two. Second Generation. An improvement over the prior generation. (Notable exceptions: the Bush family, Slashcode, FreeBSD 5.x, etc.) At least, that's what comes to my mind.

  24. Re:And for those of us with a current gentoo insta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    To upgrade Gentoo, grab the latest -STABLE release from FreeBSD.org and format your disks as UFS2. The rest is left as an excercise for the reader.

  25. Re:And for those of us with a current gentoo insta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah when 2005.0 becomes depreciated it will ask you to update /etc/make.profile... its easy just rtfm

  26. Re:Now there's one less reason for your friends to by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    I prefer fast, cheap, good, pick two or even better just 'pick two' per se.

  27. Re:Now there's one less reason for your friends to by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    Is is just me, or are the /. editors at it again?

    Nah, they didn't dupe it yet :X

  28. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and that would be wrong.

  29. But does it run... by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...binary executables now?

    1. Re:But does it run... by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 1

      No, it still runs the old-school ascii executables... But if you mean "can you install it with pre-compiled binaries" then yes, yes you can. You want a GRP installation. I believe the GRP thingy is updated every major release of gentoo.

      --
      "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
  30. Screenshots by Se7enLC · · Score: 5, Informative

    Screenshots are here

    1. Re:Screenshots by tduff · · Score: 1

      The graphical installer is not much of an improvement.

    2. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found it quite informative. I was unaware that network firewalls could be "nazi-ish". I guess I was severely underestimating how evil my network admin is!

    3. Re:Screenshots by bogie · · Score: 1

      LOL, I guess the saying that GUIs aren't always newbie friendly really does have some truth to it.
      http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/installer/scr eenshots/gtk_makedotconf.png

      http://funroll-loops.org/

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  31. One more reason to switch to Gentoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because now installing it is only like pulling teeth, whereas before it was like ripping your own eyeballs out with your fingers?

    1. Re:One more reason to switch to Gentoo by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I think you confuse Gentoo with OpenBSD. Gentoo was always like pulling teeth, just now there are less teeth to pull.

    2. Re:One more reason to switch to Gentoo by Darby · · Score: 1

      I think you confuse Gentoo with OpenBSD.

      I don't think you've ever installed OpenBSD ;-) Easiest install ever. It's text based, but the installer holds your hand and walks you through it.
      I replaced my firewall because the NICs were failing and I had an extra machine. It took me 30 minutes before the new one was up and running NAT, Port forwarding for my web server, reverse proxy to hit said web server from inside etc. and that includes figuring out the changes in pf.conf (and the fact that nat.conf was merged into it.)

      It was just as easy when I originally built the other machine 3 or 4 years ago.

  32. Re:And for those of us with a current gentoo insta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The short answer:

    Yes

    The long answer (ripped from gentoo-users mailing list)

    <blatent rip>

    Profiles mean "nothing"-- insofar as portage doesn't "divide" packages
    based on profile. In other words, it's not as if baselayout 1.11.13 is
    only available to the 2005.1 profile, while the 2005.0 profile can only
    have 1.9.4-r6 or something. Portage does sometimes disable or enable
    certain USE flags based on profile, but this is unlikely to be a big
    issue unless you're changing to a completely different profile (i.e.,
    from default x86 to selinux or something). And in any case, the profile
    is regularly incrementally updated, most likely to reflect critical
    updates (ever notice that "Performing Global Updates" that Portage
    sometimes delays your emerge with?).

    The profile is really only an issue on initial install. After that, it's
    fairly irrelevant to daily life (until Portage flatly says to upgrade it
    as the old profiles are unsupported-- most likely meaning that they will
    not be updated to reflect "things we know now that we didn't know when
    we designed the old profile"). But otherwise, I'm sure there's still a
    couple of people around here with the 1.4 profile, and definitely some
    with a 2004 profile-- because the profile "name" is not particularly
    important once Gentoo is actually up and running.

    </blatent rip>

    So you can update the profile, but it's not needed. And if it was, portage would yell at you to do it.

  33. Re:And for those of us with a current gentoo insta by Ruud+Althuizen · · Score: 2, Informative

    $ rm /etc/make.profile && ln -s /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.1/ /etc/make.profile && env-update
    Run as root as usual, guessing that you are running x86.

    --
    **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
  34. Re:They must be insane! by Aranth+Brainfire · · Score: 1

    Where is that quoted from?

    --
    "Quoting yourself is stupid." -Me
  35. Re:They must be insane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is the live SOURCE cd. The time is not to boot the disk (hint, a whole compiled system is on there), it's the time to have an install on your hard drive where all the stuff has then been recompiled exactly to your specific desires.

  36. Gentoo installer by robyannetta · · Score: 0, Redundant

    While the installer is a fantastic idea, Gentoo will never be a true mainstream product until the installer moves from the experimental release to the final release. It's only then do I expect to see the usage of Gentoo soar to the level it deserves to be at.

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    1. Re:Gentoo installer by Sweetshark · · Score: 1
  37. No Typo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo!"

    Taking several hours for the Live CD to boot suggests to me that the above statement is correct.

    Who in their right minds uses a live CD that takes hours to boot?

    1. Re:No Typo! by dstech · · Score: 1

      "Taking several hours for the Live CD to boot"

      It's already been covered elsewhere, but I'm gonna mention it here in case someone missed the posts above this one:

      The above quote is not true. It's the install to hard disk that "takes several hours". The liveCD environment is precompiled.

  38. Re:Gentoo - no thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something tells me you skipped over the use flags section.
    USE="-X" emerge php

  39. Dang! by codergeek42 · · Score: 0

    I just finished compiling 2005.0! :-P

    (This message posted by a happy Gentoo user.)

    1. Re:Dang! by jtwJGuevara · · Score: 1

      Actually I think your post raises a good point. That point being that there is this myth that gentoo takes forver to install. Of course if you try to compile from stage1 on some 333mhz intel celeron, it is going to take the course of a couple days to finish. Conversely, if you start from stage 3 on a very recent machine, you can be up and running in a working environment in ~3 hours, or quite possibly less, assuming you don't use a heavyweight window manager (aka gnome/kde). And keep in mind you always have the option of using binaries instead of compiling from source.

    2. Re:Dang! by codergeek42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. My typical install (stage 1 to having a functional GNOME setup) takes about a full day on my computer, including downloading time. It's a 2.4 GHz P4 with a gig of RAM. :-)

      Mind you, that's excluding big things like OpenOffice.org (which I usually use the binary ebuild for anyway)

    3. Re:Dang! by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      You compiled with an ancient as-of-2005.0 portage tree? Then its pretty much you own fault, if you dont rsync ...

  40. Re:Gentoo - no thanks! by kashani · · Score: 1

    vi /etc/make.conf
    USE="mmx sse mysql innodb threads nptl ssl maildir -alsa -apache2 -cups -gnome -gtk -gtk2 -java -ipv6 -kde -nls -oss -qt -sdl -X"

    New system install, Apache, Mysql, PHP, etc up to date and running on a 3Ghz P4 chip within about 5 hours of total time. Or you could just install a stage3 and then add Apache, Mysql, PHP, and dependencies in about an hour.

    Software sucks when you don't bother to read the docs.

    kashani

    --
    - Why is the ninja... so deadly?
  41. Re:Now there's one less reason for your friends to by DeathPenguin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The sentence you quoted is an example of something that should never have made it on to the front page, even on Slashdot. I really wish the editors would keep such biased remarks in a blog or some place more appropriate.

    I really do want to try this new distro out. If the graphical installer is compulsory, then yes, it will be very annoying. That's not how Gentoo has done things in the past, and I can't see a reason why they would do away with manual installs now. It's probably a simple option you can disable at the command prompt when you boot the same way you disable things like APM or DHCP discovery (noapm, nodhcp, etc).

  42. But.... by The+Hobo · · Score: 1

    (troll emulation) I use Gentoo, how does this affect.... (/troll emulation)

    oh wait...

    --
    There is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men. -- Boondock Saints
  43. Re:They must be insane! by dsd · · Score: 1

    No idea where this was quoted from, although it was likely concopted from nowhere. Either way, its (obviously) not true. The installer CD preview boots directly into a (precompiled!) graphical environment and then offers installation options at that point.

  44. It's not bad by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1

    Yeah, installing gentoo is a major pain. It took me a day and a half to get to a desktop. But once you can get to the desktop, and open a Konsole window (or whatever you want) you can minimize and move on. And this doesn't have near the problems other distributions have (fedora, debian, kubuntu)

    1. Re:It's not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You can install from stage 3 and precompiled binaries to get to the desktop in a mater of minutes and then emerge --deep -e world, go to a rave party and the box should be ready when you get back. Anyway, even if it compiles in the backgroud, you still have the desktop. No pain in my book, but a busy cpu for a while.

  45. Like the intro says, "one less reason to switch"! by wsanders · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Included with the distro!" == "Only takes a few hours to compile!"

    Do I have to install it and compile the LiceCD before I can "try and buy"? Doh!

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  46. Re:Gentoo - no thanks! by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

    You didn't tweak your use flags. A USE="-X" would have solved your problem.

  47. assumed i missed the story by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    I like to seed torrents of debian, fc4, and gentoo isos. I noticed today that my 2005.0 seed showed 0 seeds and 0 peers connected so I figured 2005.1 was out. Gentoo's torrent page was down, so I found it at tracker.netdomination.org. Had over 110 seeds connected and pushing the 6Mbps limit of my cablemodem. I just assumed I missed the story here and stumbled across the fact that it was out. Guess not. Oh, and the new Mercedes Benz Mixed Tape (#8) is out, so I grabbed that torrent, too.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  48. Re:Gentoo - no thanks! by sbennett · · Score: 1

    So basically what you're saying is that Gentoo sucks when you don't know how to use it. Big surprise there.

  49. Re:Gentoo - no thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use the right tool for the job. Sun hardware is best left to Solaris and BSD.

  50. Stupd Question by Burianski11 · · Score: 1

    I know I might be asking for too much here, but with all of the LiveCD options out there, why is it so hard to find one that works with my HP laptop OUT OF THE BOX.

    I love using LiveCDs, and would like to hand them out to co-workers (since the laptop was company issued, most of us have the same model). But it's just too difficult to hand the person a CD, a thumb drive, and say "good luck".

    Am I missing a distro that should work? I can't remember all that I've tried, but off-hand I can remember Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Knoppix, Gnoppix, Whoppix, Kanotix, PCLinuxOS, Linux4All, and MEPIS not working by default (or by changing any of the boot options).

    Or, as another option, would somebody with more time/abilities than me be interested in making a LiveCD that would work on these machines for me? For a fee, of course ;)

    1. Re:Stupd Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with my HP laptop

      well, there's your problem :p

    2. Re:Stupd Question by Burianski11 · · Score: 1

      I should note that the issues I have been having with the LiveCDs are solely with the wireless connectivity and/or the track pad.

      That, and the fact that I mistyped Stupid in the subject. Now I feel stupd.

    3. Re:Stupd Question by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      I'm currently running Fedora Core 4 (x86_64) on a HP zv6015 although I admit that it takes a little fiddling to get everything working. Really sweet though once you get a real 64 bit OS installed.

      In keeping with the topic at hand, I tried Gentoo but couldn't find any display settings that worked with the flat panel and, to the best of my knowledge, they're not documented anywhere (refresh rates, etc.). When I installed Fedora I just tried some of the pre-defined HP flat panel monitors until I found one that worked. Definitely *not* worth it to scribble down the settings that work and go back to Gentoo.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    4. Re:Stupd Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Burnskian w/e. SLAX is probably the best livecd out their.

      slax.linux-live.org

      download any version you think would be best for you and it should work. Heck right now I'm using it on a old hp laptop and it works great. Depending on your ram you might wanna get the popcorn version.

    5. Re:Stupd Question by sneakers563 · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain - wireless connectivity is a major pain in the ass with linux. Much of the blame lies with the manufacturers switching chipsets all the time, but it's compounded by the fact that about half of the howtos out there tell you to "ignore the drivers in the kernel that was released last week! Compile the ones on this website!" Alsa suffers from this too - I don't know why it has to be such a kludge and can't be better documented.

    6. Re:Stupd Question by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Considering that support for most 802.11g chipsets is nonexistent within Linux, I'd guess that's your problem.

      NDIS-wrapper works ok sometimes, but requires the Windows drivers, which could be located anywhere on the c:\ depending on the manufacturer of the computer. There was another non-free driver wrapper around that supported more chipsets, but clearly couldn't be included in a free LiveCD.

      Even if you have an Intel chipset, you still have to get the firmware somewhere (I /think/ that's not freely redistributable, even though it's a free download. But I'm not 100% sure on that).

      Anyway, the point is that it's tough to support these devices out of the box, which is why no LiveCD that I know of does so.

    7. Re:Stupd Question by Burianski11 · · Score: 1

      Might not be a bad business opportunity available here:

      A user sends in the drivers for their particular wireless setup (Broadcom in my case), along with a prioritized list of LiveCDs they would be interested in. Then, the company takes this information and builds a custom LiveCD for the requestor.

      I realize I know very little about Linux in generally and nothing about creating LiveCDs specifically... but it seems like something like this could be done in a fairly short timeframe. Then, the company holds onto any specific LiveCDs they've made, so future requests for the same hardware/distro don't have to be recreated.

      Seems like something like this could be done at a price point below $50. In which case, I would certainly be interested (again, because I have more than a few laptops here that are the same model).

      What do you say? Anybody interested?

    8. Re:Stupd Question by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea, but your target market is probably pretty slim. Lots of people who would want this would have the skills and ability to master their own LiveCD (Knoppix, at least, has a few howtos on this, and other distros actually include utilities to help you do so). On the other side of the tech spectrum, you have the users who probably don't care about Linux in the slightest. It would be a niche market, but it might be fun nonetheless.

    9. Re:Stupd Question by Burianski11 · · Score: 1

      Well, the idea being that the service could be used by people who know about Linux, and would like to spread the word... but maybe don't have the time/expertise to make 5 or 6 different LiveCDs (for their family/friends/coworkers who might be willing to give it a try).

      Since these LiveCDs don't necessarily have to be bleeding edge releases, at some point a company doing this would have very few NEW CDs to make. They would just be reselling previously made ISOs.

      I suppose they could offer a Premium service, with all sorts of personalization (which applications are installed, whether it's a CD boot or USB drive, background image, etc). But this would obviously cost more, since they wouldn't have the opportunity to reuse these ISOs.

      Just an idea. And mostly interesting to me because I would be willing to pay to have a LiveCD made that would run on my hardware. But maybe I just fit into that small niche you were talking about (somebody who knows enough about Linux to USE it, but not to master their own LiveCD).

    10. Re:Stupd Question by jimicus · · Score: 1

      You don't need 5 or 6 live CDs to support the various wireless chipsets out there.

      You need one which supports all/the majority.

      Unfortunately, wireless support is going the same way WinModem support did - nowhere fast because the manufacturers refuse to release sufficient specifications to write a driver.

  51. Vida Gentoo by manno · · Score: 1

    In other gentoo easy install goodness. The gentoo based distro Vida Linux 1.2 was released just 9 days ago 8/01/05 check it out it's a really cool distro http://desktop.vidalinux.com/

    1. Re:Vida Gentoo by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 1

      In other gentoo easy install goodness.

      Looking at the screenshots it looks to me like Anaconda Installer (RedHat/Fedora) and not gentoo's command line/new GUI.

      --
      Cheers,
      RoadkillBunny
    2. Re:Vida Gentoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. The Vida Linux folks married Gentoo with the anaconda installer, works nice and you do end up with a running Gentoo installation when it's all said and done. Mind you that this is not the same animal as the new Gentoo liveCD graphical installer (or maybe it is, I haven't seen the new LiveCD... yet)

    3. Re:Vida Gentoo by manno · · Score: 1

      I think you're right but that's not the point the whole package is pre compiled and fully opimised for you already. Wifi, graphics drivers everything.

  52. Aw shucks by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I made a smart ass remark without RFTA and it was all based on a damn lie. Sorry to raise the S/N ratio by a few hundredths of a dB.

    I couldn't find the original reference either.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  53. WRONG DAMMIT! by blockhouse · · Score: 1

    Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo!

    Reasons are discrete. This should read "one fewer reason."

    Sincerely yours,
    Your friendly neighborhood grammar Nazi.

    1. Re:WRONG DAMMIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, not that I want to argue with the "grammar nazi," but "one fewer reason"?! What grammar school did you get your Grammar Nazi degree from? Maybe if "reason" were pluralized, "fewer" would be ok, but I think using "less" is just fine here, bucko.

    2. Re:WRONG DAMMIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reasons are discrete. This should read "one fewer reason."

      Yeah they are discrete, which is probably why he used the word "one".

    3. Re:WRONG DAMMIT! by kelnos · · Score: 1
      Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo!
      Reasons are discrete. This should read "one fewer reason."

      Sincerely yours,
      Your friendly neighborhood grammar Nazi.
      Actually, you'd be more of a word-choice Nazi. His grammar was fine.

      Sincerely yours,
      Your friendly neighborhood word-choice Nazi.
      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
  54. The most telling part of why this may be a joke. by infonography · · Score: 1
    " Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo! "

    Either this was a compelling arguement gone wrong or somebody wanted to get in on todays load of Linux/BSD/OpenSuSE News with a nice prank on the Editors. What next? A live CD of SCO?

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  55. Re:Gentoo - no thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why in the hell would you compile X on a headless box?

    And you blame Gentoo??

  56. Someday by jbdodson · · Score: 0

    When the LiveCD with an installer gets out of "experimental" I might give Gentoo a go. I tried it once, not bad to setup, just takes time, however these days I am less wanting to screw around and more wanting to get stuff done. Not that Gentoo doesnt allow you to get stuff done, far from it, the setup time is just increased is all, something I want to avoid if at all possible. It already takes quite a bit of work to get my Ubuntu machine up to par. Rock on Gentoo though!

  57. Re:They must be insane! by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1

    it's a joke...

  58. Don't forget the config file by dsd · · Score: 1

    Just to add to this: as well as switching to dispatch-conf, remember to check out its config file (/etc/dispatch-conf.conf)

    There are several options which most users will want to turn on for less hassle updating configuration files: replace-cvs, replace-wscomments, replace-unmodified

  59. I don't understand... by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

    Isn't one of the main reasons to have a "LiveCD" speed and convenience? With the hours-long compile time to simply get to an optimised ramdisk image, I'm just not sure who really *needs* this.

    Don't misunderstand, I've run Gentoo and it has many geat attributes. As far as improving the install, that's great, and makes sense.

    I just have trouble imagining many scenarios where a LiveCD that takes hours to compile is the "right tool".

    It just seems to me that I'd want to invest the compile-time into something that won't be gone when I pull the CD and reboot.

    Perhaps it's a case of being able to run a ramdisk image being convenient to do before or while the compiled OS is installed. In this case, I'd question the decision to call this a LiveCD first and foremost, as opposed to an install CD with the added feature of being able to run the compiled OS in a ramdisk.

    However, seeing as the LiveCD is actually an .iso all its' own, I'm just confused as to what the reasoning was to invest the manpower in this. Not being critical here, I'm just curious.

    Just my $0.02

    Strat

    --
    Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    1. Re:I don't understand... by oddfox · · Score: 1

      I agree with most people here that a LiveCD is generally for speed and convenience with test-running a distro to see if it's something you'd enjoy. However, I don't think the Gentoo LiveCD project was aiming to do that, it was aiming to do exactly what you do with Gentoo -- End up with a system optimized (Very simply, I would imagine, in this case) for your own computer. If you want any other sort of LiveCD, you can always try the ones the members of the community regularly release. My favorite right now is ahorn's, but your mileage may vary. And no, these LiveCDs released by people are not officially sanctioned by Gentoo, but they tend to be constructed with Gentoo as a base utilizing the catalyst tool.

      Look at it this way -- what would be gained by showing people a default GNOME desktop with a minimal set of apps as a trial of Gentoo? What about a default KDE desktop? The main thing you get out of Gentoo is optimization and customizability (that you must perform!), and that's what the LiveCD shows/enables you to accomplish. If you want a quick Gentoo system, there's always been stage3, and VidaLinux has been around for a while now.

      PS -- Be glad it's only 3 hours in a ramdisk, it takes me a little while longer to get the system setup on my A64, but once it's there, minimal maintainence is required, especially if you stick with the stable branch where updates are much more planned.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    2. Re:I don't understand... by ianfs · · Score: 1

      Yes, It's very obvious you don't understand.

      It takes a few hours to go through the graphical installer and have a working, functional, installed system.

      It DOES NOT take a few hours to boot up the live CD. Coming from someone who supposedly runs Gentoo one would think you would know the difference between a Gentoo live cd and one of the many other live cd's out there (like knoppix).

      Read the article, man. Read the article...

      --
      "Terminate?"
      "Terminate... with extreme prejudice"
    3. Re:I don't understand... by nigham · · Score: 1

      What would be useful is an option where you can compile once, then store the binaries in a bootable CD format, which then becomes your Gentoo LiveCD.

      --
      I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
    4. Re:I don't understand... by bjprice · · Score: 1

      What would be even more useful would be if Gentoo did this for you. The current state of affairs, with thousands of users all wasting time compiling identical binaries, is insane.

      I understand that the mirrors' storage requirements would mushroom, but Gentoo would be several thousand times more attractive if their mirrors contained not only source, but binary compiled packages for the various combinations of architectures and USE flags.

      You'd still get the alleged "optimisation" for your setup, but it wouldn't take a week for you to install your OS.

      --
      v4sw6HPU$hw5ln6pr5$ck4ma8u7LMO$w2m6l7DL$i2e3t4MWb9AHKMRTen5a29s0r1p-5.88/-8.36g5CST
  60. Portage Consistency by dduardo · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to set standards for ebuilds. I've noticed that ebuilds marked stable are less stable than masked versions. For example, I recently upgraded to the lastest stable version of apache, but when it came time to rebuild mod_php the compile borked. I had to install masked versions of both apache and mod_php just to get the system working again.

    1. Re:Portage Consistency by oddfox · · Score: 1

      Don't take this the wrong way, but you're always able to tell portage which packages you do and don't want on the system. If an upgrade breaks something and you don't feel comfortable delving into the unstable/masked packages, all you have to do is tell portage that you don't want any version of apache newer than the one that was working for you last, or you could've just blocked the one specific version that was giving you problems.

      These are annoyances, to be sure, but they're not that hard to manage once you get the hang of portage itself. And for what it's worth, I've been using the unstable branches as long as I can remember, things rarely break on me (Heck, I had more trouble with LFS than Gentoo, decided to run back to my comfortable distro I've grown accustomed to).

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    2. Re:Portage Consistency by DrYokomohoyo · · Score: 1

      You can always quick package your current version before upgrading, just in case the new one is broken and you need to get back up quick. Portage has excellent tools and documentation to help one avoid creating a mess for themselves.

      --
      Insert clever sig (here)
    3. Re:Portage Consistency by Geeselegs · · Score: 1

      Ahh, there was a bug with mod_php. I can't remember what it was specifically, but after reading the error messages it was easy to fix. After which I looked on the website, and the solution was there also. From memory you need to change an option in the ebuild, and it was related to using the latest 2.6 series kernel. Oh yea, imo gentoo is the best linux distro.

  61. PPC by log0n · · Score: 1

    Is there a PPC version of the LiveCD available (or on it's way)? I scanned the article quickly, but didn't see anything pop out at me about it.

    1. Re:PPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/mirrors.xml select a mirror, go to releases and select ppc.... you can figure out the rest.

  62. Re:Gentoo - no thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original poster is right. It's a live cd. It's to give a taste of what to expect. It's supposed to entice you into the system. If it gave you a base and then showed you how to emerge a single piece of softare, that would be smart.

    You have 5 minutes of my time to make me interested, maybe about 15 minutes of me playing w/ it to see if I like it.

    Not an hour of me staring at a screen of compiling. What utter BS.

  63. No ReiserFS by Danuvius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gentoo's "default filesystem" (the one that's recommended for the root partition in the installation manual) is not supported. No ReiserFS with the graphical installer.

    For a large portion of Gentoo users this makes the graphical installer USELESS.

    And why is there no ReiserFS support?

    According to the, presumably 12 year old, FAQ writer for the project:
    http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng/installer/faq .xml#reiser
    "Because reiserfs == teh suck...and libparted doesn't support it very well."

    Based on past experience, I suspect behind this decision a juvenile programmer with personal dislike for Hans Reiser due to some flamewars.

    Urgh... what a pity. I hope eventually work will be taken over by people with some sense. In the meantime I'll continue being very happy with my manual gentoo installation and recommend any GUI-installation-dependent users to head on to SuSE.

    --
    Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    1. Re:No ReiserFS by Gherald · · Score: 1

      You should be able to cfdisk/mkreiserfs manually and do the rest with the GUI.

    2. Re:No ReiserFS by xpulsar87x · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you missed the second part from the FAQ:
      and libparted doesn't support it very well

      No matter what the developer's opinion of ReiserFS or Hans is, I think the second part of the FAQ entry is much more of an explanation as to why there is no ReiserFS support.

    3. Re:No ReiserFS by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      Have you used libreiserfs via parted?
      I can assume you it is "teh suck".

    4. Re:No ReiserFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damnit. I just experimented with Kubuntu, and installed Reiser because you guys always rant about how great it is. Now you're telling me it's "teh suck". At least NTFS "just works".

      I also thinks it's nice that Kubuntu warns me about Reiser after I install it. "Warning: Cannot find ext3 on partition blah blah..." every time I reboot. Thanks, dick.

    5. Re:No ReiserFS by Danuvius · · Score: 1
      Have you used libreiserfs via parted? I can assume you it is "teh suck".
      Suse can do it, XandrOS can do it, Linspire can do it, Mandriva can do it, etc...

      But the Gentoo graphical installer can't.

      Of course, it makes perfect sense the moment you realise that Gentoos big weakness is it's lack of developer talent. Err... I mean... obviously it doesn't make *any* sense.
      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    6. Re:No ReiserFS by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      a) you are talking abou a experimental installer
      b) GLI is not a top priority project
      c) SuSE, XandrOS and Linspire use the same libreiserfs as gentoo
      d) libreiserfs likes to eat partitions (read the parted homepage - there is a big, fat warning about this there)
      e) I have seen libreiserfs eat a partition (and dont tell me it was because its a "gentoo-libreiserfs" - it was from ubuntu)
      f) Take a look at the design of GLI - its very well planned, done and executed so far - using UML , a clean seperation of front and backend etc.
      g) so STFU

    7. Re:No ReiserFS by Danuvius · · Score: 1
      g) so STFU
      Clearly you are a man of great intelect and class. LMAO

      Don't tell me... are you the 12 year old FAQ writer?
      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    8. Re:No ReiserFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:No ReiserFS by cryptoluddite · · Score: 1

      I use Reiser 4 fs on gentoo and can assure you that it does indeed suck big time in some ways. It's way faster than pretty much any other filesystem, but every so often anything IO related freezes for maybe 5-10 seconds while reiserfs is, I assume, rebalancing the filesystem tree. The CPU monitor shows constant IO and the drive light is flickering during that time, so it's actually actively doing something.

      What happens is that you do a bunch of stuff and then ":wq" in vi and have to every so often have to wait a considerable time. I suppose part of the problem is gentoo's 120+ thousand files for portage and 40k files for the metadata cache. Reiser 3 was actually much better in this regard as it didn't pause for anywhere near as long.

      So I can see why they wouldn't encourage people to use a filesystem that is deprecated (reiser 3, ext2, etc) or one that is not gentoo friendly like reiser 4. Maybe it should be an option on the installer, but either way it's not a big deal since JFS is almost as fast and certainly more reliable.

    10. Re:No ReiserFS by rzebram · · Score: 1

      To be honest, however, for a respectable linux distribution, the FAQ shouldn't contain anything like the beginning of that entry. A simple "libparted doesn't support it very well at the moment, but we might consider in the future" would add a great deal to the apparent professionalism of the developers and the distribution itself. Do we see Apple and Microsoft referring to things as "teh suck" in their FAQs?

    11. Re:No ReiserFS by thinkninja · · Score: 1

      Reiser4 should really be avoided on the desktop if possible since it sacrifices 'interactivity' for throughput.

      I'm thinking of moving / and /usr to ext3 + b-trees, JFS, or XFS. I've had some bad experiences with ReiserFS so I doubt I'll ever trust it again.

      --
      "The number of Unix installations has grown to ten, with more expected." (Unix Programmer's Manual, 2nd ed.; june 1972)
    12. Re:No ReiserFS by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Obviously the comment is childish and should be restated.

      However, I do want to point out that on some archs (such as amd64) reiserfs has only recently become stable, and reiser4 has a reputation for killing hard drives. Since the graphical installer project lags behind the rest of gentoo in general, it would only be natural that support for it on this platform would be even further behind. As seen from a few posts above, apparently the libs for reiser have a reputation for being buggy, and different distros take varying stances on the risk.

      That said I've used reiserfs on x86 with no problems at all - it is considered fairly stable there, although as pointed out libparted still causes issues with it.

    13. Re:No ReiserFS by zr-rifle · · Score: 1

      ReiserFS_3 "deprecated" ?!! Are you kidding? Where the hell did you hear that? Reiser4 isn't "Gentoo unfriendly", since filesystems should be distro-agnostic. The keywords here are "unstable", "beta" and "testing-only". You are using software that's still experimental and therefore you should expect to encounter bugs and other annoyances. That's the catch for staying bleeding edge.

      I've used ReiserFS_3 for everything, from desktop workstations to mission critical servers and I haven't encountered one single fault yet. Surely, there must be a reason for NASA sponsoring and using it.

      --
      Hack your mind out of its sandbox.
    14. Re:No ReiserFS by xpulsar87x · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I 100% agree with you here. The FAQ should not contain such blatant opinions (and poor language), but I was just pointing out what the op seemed to have missed.

  64. Screw the BNSF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bigger Name, Same Fucking" Rail Road is what they said after the last merger. Oh, wait, wrong post.

    Shit, this Gentoo CD takes as long to boot as Gentoo does to compile!

  65. GUI Install not working. by dukegod · · Score: 1

    I found a mirror that had the new iso and downloaded the live cd yesterday, and tryed to install last night. The installer got hung up after making the swap partion. It just sat there. Not one peep from the installer. So i left it runing and whent to bed. woke up this morning and a password protected screen saver was running. Had no clue what the password was so i tryed a few guesses and could not get in. Rebooted the system and was greated with a lovely no os installed error. The point? #1 The installer needs better feed back so you know when it's stuck. And give you a clue as what to do to un stick it. 2# If you are going to auto-magicly log me in, let me know what the default password is. Any way... P.S. For all you losers that have noting better to do than be a bully and pick apart my post. STFU and get a life.

    1. Re:GUI Install not working. by iapetus · · Score: 1

      Well, with attitude like that I'm sure you have no problem getting help with the problems over on the Gentoo forums. ;)

      I think the magic word in this one might be 'experimental'. Hope you've reported the problems you're having with it.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    2. Re:GUI Install not working. by dukegod · · Score: 1

      Yes, my attitude is a bit rough. I guess is comes from seeing so many posts attacked over things like spelling and grammer. It makes it seem like you have to be perfect to post a reply and i don't buy in to that.

    3. Re:GUI Install not working. by iapetus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess you get that a lot from people who can't find anything to complain about in what was actually being said, so have to pick at how it was said.

      The way I look at it the only time your spelling and grammar deserve ridicule is when you're having a go at someone else for their spelling and grammar.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    4. Re:GUI Install not working. by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      Please file a bug about the screensaver, if there isnt one already. http://bugs.gentoo.org/

    5. Re:GUI Install not working. by dukegod · · Score: 1

      Just finished reporting the bug...

    6. Re:GUI Install not working. by n0d3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the default password used (for the root user) is random. Generated at each boot. So first thing you do is change the passwd. In CLI mode anyhow. (I guess you could always switch to an alternate TTY and change it in GUI mode)

      As the graphical installer is still expermintal and just reached a v0.1 this can't even be concidered a bug, yet. Rather a missing feature. (Like first thing you ask the user is wether he wants to change the default livecd passwd or root passwd (which will be used later for the real root user).

    7. Re:GUI Install not working. by dukegod · · Score: 1

      I think the bug is the screen saver starting and locking the user out. I'm a linux novice and can think of a simple fix, change the default Xscreensaver setings.

  66. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, actually he's right.

    He's right becuase he /thinks/ it's right and that is all the justification for all the FUD and flamewars that make up 99% of all /. traffic.

    If /. were limited to people that actually thought, researched, learned and spoke nothing but the facts, this place would be a ghost town.

    So as long as he is posting on /. "Gentoo" means whatever the fucking hell he or anyone else wants it to.

    Got that?!?!?

  67. There's got to be a better way by HardCase · · Score: 1

    I'm still less than enthralled with Gentoo. After a few attempts to install it on my SunBlade 100, I finally gave up. Somehow I think that the last thing that I want to do is compile every damn thing from scratch on a 500MHz UltraSPARC IIe processor. The machine sat there for several days just compiling X and KDE.

    Fedora (Aurora) isn't any better - it's a torturous installation process that is fraught with opportunities for error.

    So somebody tell me - what do I have to do to get Gentoo and KDE running on my Blade 100? I really don't like Solaris!

    -h-

    1. Re:There's got to be a better way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could get OpenBSD a whirl if you can face the low tech but effective install. I've brought many a Sun to life with OpenBSD and found the hardware support to be solid. Also, I would recommend the pain of the Gentoo install for the long term.

      I moved to Gentoo last year and after a weekend of pain thought it was the most overrated crap ever. However, after not having to do another install all year and still having a very up to date box that runs beautifully I have to say its absolutely brilliant. I imagine I want an app and a few minutes later I have it, compiled on my terms without any extra fat.

    2. Re:There's got to be a better way by Knara · · Score: 1

      Have you tried good ol' Debian? It's not bleeding edge, but whenever I have old hardware I want to put Linux on, Debian has almost done well for me. Their "testing" branch is stable enough for most people and has much more recent packages, to boot.

    3. Re:There's got to be a better way by MeerCat · · Score: 1

      Somehow I think that the last thing that I want to do is compile every damn thing from scratch on a 500MHz UltraSPARC IIe processor

      Really ?? I did a stage 1 install on my old Pentium 233MX laptop and it went OK, i Just came back to it a day or so later (without X, admittedly) and that's my home server fully built. I did add X later on, but if you think it takes too long to build KDE on your hardware, then you're probably not going to like the way it runs on there either.

      You could always try the emerge distcc support if you have more machines available.

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    4. Re:There's got to be a better way by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      It might be that you have not anough RAM. I had a machine swapping itself to dead on a glibc compile ...

    5. Re:There's got to be a better way by HardCase · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure that it's just a relatively slow processor - the machine has 2GB of RAM. But it's old tech - a 500MHz CPU, PC133 memory, you get the picture. Thanks though!

      -h-

    6. Re:There's got to be a better way by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      At this very moment I sit next to an Ultra 2 (2x 200MHz Ultrasparc) compiling a Gentoo install. From past experience I know this takes about two full days of nonstop compiling (only rarely are both processors used simultaneously). Solaris 8 is already on it and runs very smoothly of course. Getting it to dual-boot may take some effort however...

      Your question os not obvious: did you compile X etc or not? If so, what's the problem?

    7. Re:There's got to be a better way by barryvoeten · · Score: 1

      Now I dont know the specs of a 500Mhz sparc. But talking about days of emerge ?

      Why not try a binary build? There should me mirrors serving around built packages. Never tried myself.
      I;m afraid you might really need that, just because:

      The shitty thing is that, once you have it going:
      * there's a nice package xxYYz waiting to be emerged
      * you need a lot of resources to keep gnome/kde going fast
      * all apps you have open too
      * In order to really use the potential of this box you;ll use emerge on a daily basis, so once you run emerge, ** the box stalls **

      That's why i got rid of a pentium-1 200Mhz server. Too slow to emerge sync at all.

      So I recommend, maybe for you the better way is the binary built packages way.

    8. Re:There's got to be a better way by Darby · · Score: 1

      I had a machine swapping itself to dead on a glibc compile ...

      Bleagh. I just killed one of our servers on a glibc compile (well, as part of emerge -uD world). It's being repurposed, so we decided to update it. Halfway through the glibc compile it decided that /var/lib/portage was a read only filesystem.
      Now, ls, vi, top, df, mount etc etc etc all return I/O errors.
      Of course reboot and shutdown do the same thing :-(

      Luckily it's supposed to be a mirror of another machine that made it past that part so I'll just clone that one next time I go out to the cage.

      Any ideas why that would happen?

    9. Re:There's got to be a better way by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      it decided that /var/lib/portage was a read only filesystem.
      You probably mean /var/tmp/portage.
      Now, ls, vi, top, df, mount etc etc etc all return I/O errors.
      It always good to keep the emergency binaries around on a critical server: http://dev.gentoo.org/~avenj/bins/
      Any ideas why that would happen?
      Not really. Esp. since portage doesnt write to the live system until the compile is complete (only in the merging step).
      I only had problems with that when I ran out of disc space on /var, but even then portage aborted before merging.

    10. Re:There's got to be a better way by Darby · · Score: 1

      You probably mean /var/tmp/portage.

      Yep, I probably did ;-)

      It always good to keep the emergency binaries around on a critical server:

      Nice!. Thanks.

      I only had problems with that when I ran out of disc space on /var, but even then portage aborted before merging.

      Hmmm... It was step 20 something out of 80 something, so the previous steps had completed. Possibly /var is full, but I can't check until I get down there and boot off the live CD.

      Thanks for the advice!

  68. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are in the St. Louis, MO area, you can go check out the cute and playful gentoo penguins at the zoo. Take a jacket. It's 45F or so in the penguin house. Brrrrr.

    STL Zoo
  69. Re:Gentoo - no thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what USE flags are for. They are explained quite simply and fully in the documentation.

  70. that's not what it said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >A few hours just to boot a liveCD?

    Did it SAY it takes "a few hours to boot a live CD"? No, it didn't.

    MODERATORS: why is the parent post "INSIGHTFUL" - because it is over your head, or you just don't like Linux (or Gentoo)?

    The parent poster is just wrong.

    I dont use Gentoo because I depend on knowing Fedora for work, but Gentoo is a fine distro. I've used it (second stage install).

  71. Re:Gentoo - no thanks! by kashani · · Score: 1

    um... that's exactly what the Gentoo LiveCD does though the Gentoo LiveCD in the past hasn't been the same sort of enviroment like Knoppix gave you.

    This user then went on to install packages without looking at his USE variables. X windows is by default part of a standard profile so X support would be compiled into things that support it like mod_php. If you don't want X it's easy enough to tell Gentoo to globally ignore any call for X and you can even tell Gentoo to skip X (or other optional dependecy) on a per package basis. None of that is what this user did which is why it took so long.

    kashai

    --
    - Why is the ninja... so deadly?
  72. Re:flamebait by t35t0r · · Score: 2, Funny

    should have been, "Use Gentoo, because shit scrolling by for hours makes your boss think you're doing something productive".

  73. gentoo l00z3rz just don't get it! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    If you didn't hand-assemble it yourself, who says that you haven't been p0wn3d?!!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:gentoo l00z3rz just don't get it! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      If you didn't write the compiler yourself in machine code, how can you be sure? In fact, you should probably design and fab the chip yourself too for ultimate security.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:gentoo l00z3rz just don't get it! by LordoftheWoods · · Score: 1

      You hand built it by sticking a cd in your drive?

      Please..

      LFS is much closer to 'hand assembled' but even then you are told precisely what to do and dont really need to think.

  74. Gentoo by DJCater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a Gentoo user, used the 2004.1 Minimal LiveCD and a stage-1 package to start me off. I spent 2 days getting it working. Actually, I spent 2 days getting it running. I wouldn't really call it working. I was experimenting with make.conf, and basically I fucked it up big style. No problem, I've got plenty of time.

    So I fixed up, did it again, and actually got GNOME running. It still sucked though, I was useless at kernel configuration. And I thought that using the 2.4 kernel would be best, you know, more stable. Well yeah, but I don't have hardware from the 90s.

    3rd time around, it was cool, and still is. You don't need to reinstall when a new release comes out, just use emerge.

    I love my system. It's tweaked specifically for my hardware and the use. It's fast, startup and use. It's lean. And I _did_ learn a lot from it. Thank-you Gentoo.

    --
    Sig Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:Gentoo by oddfox · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the story, sounds a bit like mine, except for the kernel configuration bit, since I started out with Mandrake and then Slackware. :)

      One of the best things about Gentoo is from step 1 you're having to understand what you're doing to your system. This causes some newcomers distress but that's what the forums are for! I know I'm not the only one that scours the forums for posts with no replies to see if I can't help a straggler who got lost. And the most underrated feature of Gentoo is stage3, IMHO.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    2. Re:Gentoo by archen · · Score: 1

      Since you installed 2004.1 you obviously had to go through all the hoops (why from stage 1 I'm not sure...). But it seems as though people abstract this stuff in a gui that we're sort of losing a big portion of the learning experience with Gentoo. If I screw up any part of the install (filesystem aside) I'm totally confident that I can just pop in the CD and Fix it, or at least bootstrap my system from the CD - and pretty much every Gentoo user should be able to do that. Can't say I ever learned that from RedHat/SuSE/Fedora.

      Basically now we're getting back to the point where Gentoo becomes FreeBSD. An installer does a lot of the work for you, then lets you recompile the system or additional packages.

      Personally I'd be happier if gentoo just stuck the install documentation stuff in a man page you could read during an install. THAT would be handy. Well that and getting rid of the useless -D flag for emerge. Not sure why I'd want to keep some software up to date, but not the dependancies. I got my system into a decent bind that way.

    3. Re:Gentoo by Samari711 · · Score: 1

      It definitely took me a few tries to get Gentoo running when i started messing with it, now it's my distro of choice, and I actually understand kernel configs somewhat competently. The Gentoo community really is great, Whenever google, the Gentoo wiki and forum search turn up nothing, someone #gentoo on freenode almost always pulls through. Now that I've got 3 computers running it with Distcc and cccache installed, compile times aren't too bad anymore :)

      --

      I never said I was smart, I just said I was smarter than you

    4. Re:Gentoo by oddfox · · Score: 1

      Your 3 computers make me drool, indeed. Distcc and ccache are wonderful tools, I remember the good 'ol days of hijacking other people's machines with a distcc bootable disc while they're away to steal the CPU cycles to help my system compile faster. Heh, that's so incredibly geek, but it was when I had my K6-III/450, so at least it was warranted.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
  75. one less reason by digitalderbs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo!

    what they really mean is that the graphical installer is harder to use than the terminal commands.

  76. Next big improvement for gentoo by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 1

    Would be storing /usr/portage in a huge .zip file. There are 121537 files in portage on my system and that constitutes a massive overhead on the filesystem and degrades the performance. And when updating it tends to scatter lots of little tiny files all over the disk, making performance even worse. With Reiser 4 is literally takes 6+ seconds to rebalance the filesystem tree, which happens ever so often.

    It should be simple in python to just replace file.open to first look in /usr/portage for an actual file and then in /usr/portage.zip for the official sync version. So you would still get the benefits of being able to tweak individual files without the drawbacks of 100k+ files. It should use zip instead of tar since zip files are random access. Even uncompressed the zip file is a massive improvement.

    1. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by Abalamahalamatandra · · Score: 1

      And where exactly are you going to get the huge bandwidth that will be necessary to do that?

      Portage updates use rsync for a reason - so that the entire Portage tree doesn't have to be downloaded every time an "emerge sync" is run.

      If you use a zip file, everybody will be downloading the whole thing every time they update, and bandwidth usage on the Portage mirrors will go through the roof.

      Reiser barfs that bad on a lousy 120,000 files? Geez, no wonder I've always been suspicious of it, apparently rightfully so...

    2. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by oringo · · Score: 1

      That takes the benefits of rsync out of picture, doesn't it? Unless you can do rsync over a .bz or .tgz file?

    3. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      Except, what about /usr/portage/distfiles? I guess you could move that to another directory, but I gained 1.7G when I cleaned that out the other day. Now that I think about it, I'd like some official method of clearing that directory in an automatic way. I know there's some scripts that have been written out there, but it'd be nice to be able to e-merge it :)

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    4. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's harder to rsync your portage tree if it is in a zip/tar file...

      You could extract it, and recompress it for each emerge sync, but it's probably not a very popular option

    5. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by oddfox · · Score: 1

      I'm running Reiser4 right now on my ~amd64 Gentoo installation and just am curious as to where this 6+ second lag to rebalance the filesystem tree occurs? ReiserFS v3, Reiser4, JFS, ext3 and XFS have never given me any weird delays, and it makes me wonder if it might be an issue with the kernel you're using, or some loopy CFLAGS. I'll wager you're smarter than the CFLAGS thing, though.

      I wouldn't be surprised if I was misunderstanding your post, clarification would be nice, though.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    6. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      emerge tmpwatch

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    7. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Reiser barfs that bad on a lousy 120,000 files? Geez, no wonder I've always been suspicious of it, apparently rightfully so...

      No, it doesn't. If you're going to make technical decisions based on unverified information from random Slashdot posters, especially when it flies in the face of reality (ReiserFS was designed to handle lots of small files), then I hope you don't do this kind of thing for a living.

      I've got about 2 million e-mails stored on a ReiserFS partition in maildir format (all single files) and I can assure you that most other filing systems would shit themselves. Performance aside, if I moved them to Ext2 they would take up at least twice as much space since ReiserFS packs together files smaller than the cluster size.

    8. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 1

      I was talking about Reiser 4 FS not ReiserFS (ie version 3). I also have a mix of largs files (4gb) and lots of tiny files for portage. Maybe that's why.

    9. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 1

      Rsync works within files too. If they change one ebuild in an uncompressed portage.zip you'll download just that one piece. There's some overhead to hash the other parts, but it's roughly equivalent to the overhead of sending a filelist + modtime for 120k files. Since zip compresses files individually you could probably change one file even with a compressed zip and still only download that one file.

      So end result is no change in mirror bandwidth.

    10. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 1

      total files - 960,000
      kernel - 2.6.13-rc3-mm1, smp, preempt
      mem - 1gb
      max swap - 5gb
      fs - reiser 4, noatime

      several ~4gb files that get random parts modified a lot, lots of small files being created/deleted.

      I've tried this exact same setup on JFS, ext3, and resier 3 (by tar'ing system to other computer, mkfs, untar) and none of them had this problem except reiser 4.

    11. Re:Next big improvement for gentoo by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      Woo hoo! Thanks :)

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  77. What, you think it's accidental? by Lifewish · · Score: 1

    I read it as a finely tuned critique of GUI installers, personally. Of course, I'm nearly passed out from overdoing a martial arts session, so maybe it's just me.

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
  78. Are you related to... by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    the Nazi-ish firewall Nazi?

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:Are you related to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No packets for you!

  79. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by Steven+W00ston · · Score: 0

    So wait what's wrong with FreeBSD 5 now?

    --
    Steven Wooston, Lead Programmer, J-J-J-Julius Games
    Author of a CONSIDERABLE number of best-selling games
  80. Graphical Installer by ndansmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    The pain-in-the-butt, lengthy, confusing terminal installation process is what I like about Gentoo. It is the first Linux distro I ever used, and the difficult installation process gave me some nice hands-on experience and put me ahead of the curve compared to most Linux n00bs. Having a graphical hold-my-hand-daddy version takes all the fun out of it!

    1. Re:Graphical Installer by Alan · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but your post looks like something right out of http://funroll-loops.org/ :) I love gentoo as well, however, having a way to *quickly* get the system installed is something that I like. If I'm sitting in a colo upgrading my server (in this case, from debian to gentoo), sitting and going through the manual procedure sucks. I want to stick a CD in, click a few buttons, and end up at the same point that I was at after the by-hand install process. Of course, linux is all about choice, so I'm sure that you can have your text install while others have their graphical install.

      No offense, but just because you followed the directions in the install guide doesn't mean you're now a linux guru :)

    2. Re:Graphical Installer by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      ... but it will also allow unattended installs ...

    3. Re:Graphical Installer by ndansmith · · Score: 1
      I want to stick a CD in, click a few buttons, and end up at the same point that I was at after the by-hand install process.

      But you wont be at the same point as after a manual installation. Now I am going out on a limb here, but I doubt that configuring your own kernel using menuconfig is possible using the graphical installer. That means that you don't get a customized kernel (i.e. you have a server with needless PCMCIA drivers and what-not compiled into the kernel), which is what Gentoo is known for.

      No offense, but just because you followed the directions in the install guide doesn't mean you're now a linux guru :)

      I never said that; I said that I am little bit ahead of my n00b peers. :-)

    4. Re:Graphical Installer by jgordon7 · · Score: 1

      See this is where an ssh install is most useful. Just pop in the CD at the colo, define your root password and start up sshd. Then go home ssh in and do the install.

      Or even better, if said machine already has a distro on it with a free partition. Do the upgrade completely remotely, without having to bring down the current system! Just setup the free partition, download the tar.gz and chroot your environment and go to town. After the install is done, reboot the machine to the new Gentoo system. Only down time is the time required to reboot once, and never once having to go to the physical server. This part requires some balls, and extreme confidents in your skill to do it right the first time.

    5. Re:Graphical Installer by Alan · · Score: 1

      Regarding the kernel, this is true, however, it's not unrealistic to have it let you drop down to the shell to do the menuconfig. And as far as I know, gentoo isn't known for allowing you to compile your own kernel, it's known for system costomization, use flags, portage, ebuilds, etc. I'm also sure that it's not unrealistic to think that there's an easy solution (throw up xconfig) to let you costomize your kernel if you want to.

      My main issue is that it's not just the kernel that takes the time, it's all the other stuff that you're forced to do by hand, instead of streamlining it :)

  81. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1, Cynic

  82. Blog-o-riffic! by Valdrax · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Guess not. Oh, and the new Mercedes Benz Mixed Tape (#8) is out, so I grabbed that torrent, too.

    You have a blog, right? Please give us the link so that we can follow more of the fascinating minutae of your daily life.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Blog-o-riffic! by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      That's funny. Good stuff. No, actually I don't. Funny you should mention that, as I was coming back here to post how sad it is that the new ibiblio torrent site has a video on the triangle blogger's meeting. That's when I encountered your contribution that couldn't be more off base. Sorry about discussing a torrent for halfway decent, free and freely redistributable music.

      I will try to keep future posts more interesting. Piracy roxxors. Copyrights should be unconstitutional. I want to pay 1c per album when I download them via BitTorrent because the distribution doesn't cost the record company anything. Did I miss anything? Thanks for playing, but next time check the uid. Capped since there was a cap.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    2. Re:Blog-o-riffic! by Valdrax · · Score: 0, Troll

      Reread your original post. Please -- as a public service? It's one of the most narcissistic and content-free posts I've seen outside of a blog which is what led to my smart ass comment. The entire post is about you and the torrents you seed under the assumption that someone cares. No one does. Contribute something about the release itself instead of something about how you noticed it and added to your torrents list along with some piece of music that meets your rarified tastes.

      Also, no one cares about your uid, your fans list, your penis size, or whatever other superficial measures you use to prop up your self esteem. Only the insecure do, and bragging about it just makes you look bad.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  83. my Gentoo 2c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The very last Linux distro I ever got to work. I tried everything over the last few years but Gentoo is the one that I could never get to install. Often gcc would die for a complicated reason that meant looking through source or makefiles and it was just all too much hard work. Other times I was scuppered by faulty distro CDs or unavailable online packages.
    I have always dissed Gentoo and much prefer binary package systems like apt.

    But - just recently I got a happy Gentoo thing happening on VIA C3 mini-itx. What is the great thing about Gentoo then? Basically it seems to run about twice as fast. The long compile time seems well worth a 100% speed increase. Particularly, sound (with Jack and Alsa) works very well indeed even without the low latency kernel options.

    Much hard labor indeed, but possibly worth it where you want optimised performance.

  84. There's already a great Live CD for bootstrapping by chudnall · · Score: 1

    Gentoo. It's called Knoppix

    --
    Disclaimer: Evolution comes with NO WARRANTY, except for the IMPLIED WARRANTY of FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  85. Re:They must be insane! by rapidweather · · Score: 1

    Ok, I got a good laugh out of this. I know they are serious, and this is a nice distro. Didn't Bill Gates hire the developer of Gentoo to be his linux man? Gentoo must be good to make Microsoft want to pick him out of all of the linux folks out there!
    Although I have my own knoppix remaster, I like to run SLAX linux livecd in ram. Very fast, and SLAX is smaller than mine, so it gets up and running in ram very quickly.

  86. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by the+arbiter · · Score: 1

    While I appreciate your efforts at preserving the shattered remmnants of the English language, you are (figuratively, of course) pissing into a hurricane. Slashdot posters might collectively be the most illiterate group of educated folks found anywhere.

    --
    Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
  87. One LESS Reason?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure that there's one less reason for my friend to switch - my diehard geek friend said the GUI interface is not geeky enough.

  88. poll idea by sootman · · Score: 1

    Which distro posting results in the most 'funny'-moderated comments?
    ( ) Fedora
    ( ) Mandrake
    ( ) Gentoo
    ( ) Slackware
    ( ) Debian
    ( ) Yggdrasil
    ( ) Lindows
    ( ) Novell
    ( ) SCO
    ( ) Slackware jokes aren't funny, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:poll idea by JudeanPeople'sFront · · Score: 1

      Can't that be calculated somehow from the posts, why vote on it? And Yggdrasil, man?!

  89. Ubuntu & Gentoo by alucinor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At home, I use Ubuntu and Gentoo -- the former for fun, the latter for development. I've found that if I'm needing to find stuff and compile it, Gentoo is the most friendly distro. On Ubuntu, you have to first find out all the various dev packages you need to compile something, and it can be a real pain. Not so with Gentoo!

    Gentoo is really only good in this respect, though. I also like it as a hobby system, and avoid software with really long compiles on it. So I say, if you're going to go Gentoo, avoid Gnome and KDE and go with something more in the Gentoo spirit, something like FVWM2 or OpenBox. You can pair it down and tweak it to be a real workbench OS, no frills.

    --
    random underscore blankspace at ya know hoo dot comedy.
  90. Re:There's already a great Live CD for bootstrappi by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    You can use pretty much any distro, not just Live CDs, to install Gentoo. I did my first installs from Mandrake to another partition, as I didn't have a CD burner then. I think it tells a lot about Gentoo philosophy that you can even choose your installer.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  91. Great by Idealius · · Score: 1

    ^ Sarcasm.

    I mean yeah, it's great, but I just setup two Gentoo boxes at work the last few days!! :(

    I was amazed how unfriendly it was from a graphical installer POV (i.e. it had none!).

    I've used Slackware in the past, and aside from setting up your fstab, it was a breeze so it was very suprising the installation was so complex.

    But, like the above posters, I now know much more about how Linux works. And yes, emerge rocks.

    All in all, it's my new fav distro, and this will make it more accessible to the less technically-inclined.

  92. What's the point of a Gentoo livecd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Isn't the whole idea of Gentoo that you compile everything? Isn't the whole idea of a LiveCD that you have a CD that always works that you can quickly test and use?

    The way to combine these two features is not to make a Gentoo LiveCD, but rather to make a tool within Gentoo that makes it easy to roll-your-own LiveCD. Now that would be cool. I go through and select which software I want on it, depending on the application. For example, maybe I want a media player, so I put on Mplayer and some good media apps. I select which architecture I want it for: Pentium, x86_64, or maybe even PPC (why not cross compile). Then it makes the image for me.

    That would be cool. The thing I don't like about Knoppix is that it comes with some stuff that I don't want. Obviously, there are other people who do want it, for good reasons, but not me. And it lacks some stuff that I do want. For example I would like Knoppix with one browser, with Flash and proprietary codecs. If I could easily roll my own I would have that.

    -------------------
    Every thought about becoming a defense contractor?

    1. Re:What's the point of a Gentoo livecd? by jtwJGuevara · · Score: 3, Informative
      Isn't the whole idea of Gentoo that you compile everything? Isn't the whole idea of a LiveCD that you have a CD that always works that you can quickly test and use?

      What Gentoo calls a "LiveCD" is mostly different from what every other distribution refers to as a "LiveCD". It's still a true "LiveCD" in that it is a bootable cd that contains a fully working instance of Gentoo on it. However this working instance of Gentoo is a minimal, command line driven (until this release) instance and its purpose is to give you an environment in which you can begin installing Gentoo from scratch to your hard drive.

    2. Re:What's the point of a Gentoo livecd? by ytm · · Score: 1

      What Gentoo calls a "LiveCD" is mostly different from what every other distribution refers to as a "LiveCD". It's still a true "LiveCD" in that it is a bootable cd that contains a fully working instance of Gentoo on it. However this working instance of Gentoo is a minimal, command line driven (until this release) instance and its purpose is to give you an environment in which you can begin installing Gentoo from scratch to your hard drive.
      How is this "LiveCD" different from what other distros call a "Install+RescueCD". Most install CDs also have minimal command line interface available and waiting on another virtual terminal.

    3. Re:What's the point of a Gentoo livecd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean something like catalyst?

    4. Re:What's the point of a Gentoo livecd? by wolf31o2 · · Score: 1

      No, what Gentoo calls a "LiveCD" is a complete environment. We call our installation media an InstallCD, and not a LiveCD. It is our users that tend to not make the distinction.

  93. Someone's gotta say it... by Mr.+Cancelled · · Score: 1

    "In Soviet Union, Gentoo compiles you!"

    Seriously, where is that Yakov Smirfnoff wannabe? I finally get used to seeing the same lame joke over and over on every thread, and suddenly he's gone!

    Damn Russians! Get us hooked on their lame assed humor, and boom! Suddenly they pull the Gorbachev out from under us...

  94. What's different (aside from liveCD) by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

    Not much:

    # diff 2005.0/packages 2005.1/packages
    3c3
    < # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/default-linux/x86 /2005.0/packages,v 1.3 2005/03/28 22:09:18 wolf31o2 Exp $
    ---
    > # $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/default-linux/x86 /2005.1/packages,v 1.2 2005/07/07 20:11:37 wolf31o2 Exp $
    14,16c14,15
    < >dev-lang/gpc-2.1
    < >=sys-apps/baselayout-1.9.4-r3
    < >=sys-devel/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1
    ---
    > >=sys-apps/baselayout-1.11.12-r4
    > >=sys-devel/binutils-2.15.90.0.3-r4

    --

    ----
    All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    1. Re:What's different (aside from liveCD) by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      Although you gotta admit the new baselayout is really nice - esp. the new /etc/init.d/net.*

    2. Re:What's different (aside from liveCD) by makomk · · Score: 1

      The new baselayout rocks though. To enable wpa_supplicant, all you have to do is add two lines to /etc/conf.d/net and create a suitable /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf. It's all documented and it's almost as easy as a good GUI.

      Also, I read that they're finally including ndiswrapper. About time!

  95. one more reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    not to use gentoo

    Gentoo Linux causes global warming! Needlessly recompiling everything uses power. Fossil fuels are used to generate that power. Hug a tree, use Debian!

  96. Re:There's already a great Live CD for bootstrappi by greginnj · · Score: 1

    Did you actually succeed at installing Gentoo from a Knoppix boot, or are you just going by what's on the website?

    I just got Gentoo running a few weeks ago, and am very happy with it -- but I had to abandon the Knoppix-based install, and switch to the stage 3 GT ISO, because the Knoppix-based install instructions got me very confused. Things that were happening on my disk didn't seem to match up to locations/filenames in the docs...

    --
    Read the best of all of Slash: seenonslash.com
  97. Gentoo livecd by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    ... it ships with a initrd containing bash, gcc, tar, gzip, and gentoo_src.tar.gz

  98. Gentoo Linux 2005.1 for Athlon XP is bad by tres3 · · Score: 1

    There was a bug discovered in the Stage 3 release of Gentoo 2005.1 for the Athlon XP at about 3:30 AM last night. I filed a bug report about it and there is a new release winding its way through the mirrors and should be out soon.

  99. Re:There's already a great Live CD for bootstrappi by chudnall · · Score: 1

    I actually did it, but then I had to start from scratch with the Gentoo cd, since you can't do an AMD64 install while booted from a 32-bit distro. Since then, a 64-bit knoppix has come out, so this should not be an issue. Of the two methods, I found the Knoppix bootstrap procedures to be *much* more straight-forward, not to mention being able to surf the web and do other stuff while the install was going on. What wasn't matching up for you? Once you do the chroot, the directory tree should match up with the docs.

    --
    Disclaimer: Evolution comes with NO WARRANTY, except for the IMPLIED WARRANTY of FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  100. Duh by alc6379 · · Score: 1

    Because anytime you're at an Internet-connected computer, you can say, "I can see my house from here!"

    --
    I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
  101. I love Gentoo, but... by SyntheticTruth · · Score: 1

    I've been using Gentoo for well over a year now. I switched to it from RedHat (a system that was pre-Fedora) which at the time had a paid-in-full RedHat Network acess for updates. However, the problem with RH at the time was that I am also a KDE user. (No stupid flame-wars, please, to each their own, choices are good, etc, etc...) Even getting the latest stable KDE installed via rpms was a royal pain, to say the least. Almost like getting updated, stable packages from non-experimental Debian at the time. ;-) (Again, no flames, read on, pilgrim...)

    I decided to try Gentoo 1.4 out on my desktop here at home, since overall, I'd lose nothing but time if it got botched. Now, I have read many times that all installing Gentoo teaches you is how to follow instructions. I disagree, to a point, since if you are a curious geek like I was, you wonder *why* things are how they are. For that, I really loved Gentoo because it *did* teach *me* some thing about Linux I had not known previously -- I compiled my first custom-kernel in Gentoo. I never had to do that in RH. There were many, many firsts for me in playing with my Gentoo system. And Portage, I loved it...it actually had *updates*. The Gentoo community absolutely rocked (and still does, imho) when I did have trouble... ...but then, I wanted to upgrade KDE to the latest again. Anyone who has done this in Gentoo knows the pain; even with unsermake it took a full day on my little box to compile. So, I decided to try the pre-compiled packages, but this is not the "Gentoo way" and I agree with that sentiment to an extent, because there *are* benefits (even if small) to compiling everything natively. Well, let's just say my pre-compiled packages caused more gray hair and the wife noticed. (Seriously, no kidding. :-/ )

    So, after hearing good things about Ubuntu, I got curious, but had *just* gotten my Gentoo box set back up just the way I liked it and really, I was not a Gnome fan. (Just a preference, choice is good, put down the torches...) So, I held back, even after my nvidia opengl stopped working. Finally, I heard about Kubuntu and got curious again. After a vacation to Thailand, I had to come back a two weeks earlier than my wife (we were visiting her family) and I got bored without a wife around to find *other* things for me to do...and /home partition was on it's own partition...so I said "Screw this, I'm installing Kubuntu." So I did...

    Now, to be honest, I have *always* liked apt-get and Debian in general, but the lack of up-to-date software outside of the 'stable' repos was really frustrating. This is my desktop, I don't mind taking *some* risks in my installation of software. Now, however, thanks to the hard-work of the (k)ubuntu crews and the 'universe' repos, I had compiled binaries of the software I wanted that was still mostly up-to-date.

    I love Gentoo, as much as someone can love a Linux distro, because it *was* very educational to me and for the tinkerer, I still think it's the best distro if you have the time for it. My problem is, I don't have time anymore, and although I still tinker in my coding projects, I want my software updated today, not compiling over night. In a way, I am just a *bit* sad that I won't get to try out the new Gentoo install and see what is new in it, but maybe in the next life... Heh.

  102. graphical installer POV (i.e. it had none!). by tres3 · · Score: 1
  103. Re:They must be insane! by dotgain · · Score: 1

    Just one of those jokes that's _really_ hard to spot. Read: a joke of a joke.

  104. Re:There's already a great Live CD for bootstrappi by tres3 · · Score: 1

    I've installed Gentoo from ancient Slakware boot floppies. You just need tar & chroot and your good to go.

  105. That's not what he meant, was it? by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo!

    I think you meant that there is one more reason, yada yada.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  106. Re:There's already a great Live CD for bootstrappi by greginnj · · Score: 1

    Ok, I apologize -- I must have screwed something up. I see two posts already saying - no problems with a Knoppix CD. I didn't take notes on what seemed off with mine (we don't need no steenking documentation), since I'd already told myself that I could start over with the Gentoo boot CD.

    Next time, I'll do it from Knoppix, and now that I've been through it once, it should go more smoothly next time. Thanks for the encouragement!

    --
    Read the best of all of Slash: seenonslash.com
  107. Re:There's already a great Live CD for bootstrappi by Russellkhan · · Score: 1

    I installed Gentoo a few times, once from the 2004.1 CD, and several times using Knoppix. Overall, I found the Knoppix install to be a much better experience (Among other things, I had a nice, usable system the whole time).

    There were a few little gotchas from what I remember, something about changing the location of /dev or something like that, but I seem to remember the instructions laid out the necessary changes pretty clearly, at least to my style of thinking.

    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
  108. Re:There's already a great Live CD for bootstrappi by Russellkhan · · Score: 1

    One great thing about using Knoppix is that you can Konqeror or Firefox open to the Gentoo handbook pretty much the whole time.

    Oh, a tip in case it's not already a regular part of your toolkit: Screen is your friend during a Gentoo install (No matter whether you're using Knoppix or the Gentoo CD).

    Good luck on the next install!

    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
  109. argh by l0rdpestilence · · Score: 0

    gentoo 1.4 is still compiling you insenstive clods!

  110. Mod parent -1 Troll, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure what the root of Danuvius's ignorant, foaming-at-the-mouth hatred of Gentoo is, but whatever it is doesn't make his trolling "insightful". Mod this crap down and mod some of the replies up. Sheesh.

  111. Re:They must be insane! by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    A few hours just to boot a liveCD? No thanks.

    Nah-- the actual boot process--- you know, loading the kernel, etc. happens quite quickly. On the other hand, compiling all the software you want to use may take anywhere from a few minutes to a few weeks depending on the software you want to use and the power of your computer.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  112. Re:Now there's one less reason for your friends to by plughead · · Score: 1
    If the graphical installer is compulsory, then yes, it will be very annoying.
    Actually, at this point the installer is an experimental ALPHA version and is completely separate from the 2005.1 release. So, not only is it not required, but you have to go out of your way to get it.
    --
    If a giant oil company wanted an abortion, would W's head explode?
  113. You forgot to invoke Ricer's Law! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ricer's Law: As a thread about Gentoo grows longer, the probability that a post mentioning "ricers" [1] will occur will approach 100%.

    1st Corrolary to Ricer's Law: All rational discussion after this point will then cease, to be replaced by jokes and tasteless puns.[2]

    [1] Or any similar comparisons to over-modified cheap import cars where the modifications are of dubious performance value, even if they lack the term "ricer."
    [2] Puns that taste like some form of cheese are not considered tasteful, even if they could be tasty.
    [3] There is no footnote three. Except the one you're looking at. Go away!

  114. Re:And for those of us with a current gentoo insta by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
    But otherwise, I'm sure there's still a couple of people around here with the 1.4 profile

    I did have a 1.4 profile until a few months ago but I was finally forced to upgrade it. That's not bad for a 1.4-rc2 livecd install from two years ago. Updating Redhat was a nightmare when I had to do that. It was more frequent and broke many packages.

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
  115. DON'T TRY IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It autmatically formatted my Microsoft Windows 2000 partition, this software has cost me thousands of dollars.

  116. If you don't like it... by deep44 · · Score: 1

    To all the people flaming Gentoo:

    Nobody is trying to force you to use Gentoo. If you don't see any benefit in compiling your own software, don't use Gentoo. Instead, find another distro, where you can quickly and easily install pre-compiled binaries of your favorite authentication modules and remote access tools.

  117. Uhhhh what? by ZeroZen · · Score: 1

    "Now there's one less reason for your friends to switch to Gentoo!"

    Anyone catch this? I guess slashdot hates gentoo. Go figger.

  118. Engrish by iowa119900089 · · Score: 1

    One Fewer reason. Less describes when something is measurable, fewer when it is countable. 12 items or fewer.... 12 items or less is incorrect.

  119. but why this is modded as funny... by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    strange people, in the slashdot lurks...

  120. Installing Gentoo / liveCD by byssebu · · Score: 0

    Okej, we know, everyone knows that it takes some time to compile a whole system, but that doesn't make the install complicated. If you're not sure about how to do the install, just follow the installation guide (http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86-quickinst all.xml). Why does everyone keep talking about compiling the system when you boot the liveCD, that doesn't even make sense. We're talking about a graphical installer here, the CD boots an installer not automaticly starts a compilation to a ramdisk. When you INSTALL Gentoo, THEN it will compile.

  121. Re:And for those of us with a current gentoo insta by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

    Generally you don't need to update your profile until it gets pretty old (like a 1.2 or 1.4 version) as portage handles the dependencies and upgrades once the system is installed. If you're on a 2004 or 2005 profile, you're fine as you are, even the 1.4 profiles were only warned about to push forward adaption of stacked profiles.

    However, there is a page on changing your profile here

    It'll likely be updated to include the 2005.1 profile in the next couple of days.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  122. Re:Meaning of Gentoo? by caluml · · Score: 1

    I saw a very rare albino penguin at Bristol Zoo. I emailed Linus to ask if we should kill it, and he said no, diversity is good - let it live. I snapped a pic on my phone and also one of Gentoo

  123. SCOutrageous LiveCD!!11ONE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For $699, they love you long-time...

  124. Typo? by wild_berry · · Score: 1

    I'm noob here. Is that comment about RicerFS a typo? ;-) (just joking. expecting -2 overall moderation and troll/flamebait)

  125. All I can say to that is... by Ben+Urban · · Score: 1

    Ha! You got exactly what you deserved. GLI is in the ALPHA stage. That means that you should not use it unless you can afford to have it hose your system. Even so, it wouldn't automatically format a partition unless you told it to. So it's 100% your own damn fault. You have no sympathy from me or anyone else. Now that your Windows partition no longer has Windows on it, you may as well install a nice, easy distro like Mandrake, since you are not the kind of person who would find Gentoo useful. P.S. I am making an extraordinary effort to hold back. Consider yourself lucky.

    --
    Every time you run "emerge", a Microsoft drone dies.
  126. Major corrections and clarifications... by Ben+Urban · · Score: 1

    I realize some of you will completely ignore me anyway, but I'm hoping enough will read it to make this worthwhile...

    * The Live CD is already compiled; it will not compile itself when you try to boot from it.

    * A stage 1 install from scratch (including KDE or GNOME) does still take several hours, or even several days on very slow computers. It's supposed to.

    * If you want to install it in less than several hours, you have many options available at your disposal:

    * You can use a stage 3 install so that you have a relatively quick bare bones system, and then you can compile what you need (or use binary packages in portage for the really big stuff),

    * You can use a stage 3 install combined with GRP, so that the only thing you need to compile is the kernel, or

    * You can now use a stage 3 install with GRP _and_ the binary kernel from the CD itself. This option has been clocked as low as 8 minutes for a fully working system! (Beat that, Windows!)

    --
    Every time you run "emerge", a Microsoft drone dies.