Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.5 Released

WhiteFoxBR writes ""The KDE Project is happy to announce a new major release of the award-winning K Desktop Environment. Many features have been added or refined, making KDE the most complete, stable and integrated free desktop environment available." Here a Visual Guide to new features, including build-in ad-block for Konqueror and support for MSN and Yahoo! webcams in Kopete. "

385 comments

  1. Kool! by suso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Way to go KDE folks and supporters. Even though I'm a Gnome user (actually, I'm a closet FVWM user), KDE never ceases to impress me and I do try it for periods of time. The last 8 years I've been using Open Source Software and Linux have been amazing. The amount of progress that all of us have made. There is still more to go, but its not hard to see that the gap is really closing in now. All the hard work and patience has paid off. Everyone give yourself a pat on the back.

    1. Re:Kool! by ramrom · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Webcam support for Yahoo was what I was waiting for. I had to switch to windows to do this before.

    2. Re:Kool! by digidave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Mac OSX and Windows may be proprietary DRM infected piles of shit... but they are damned sight more stable, integrated and complete than KDE... so is GNOME for that matter."

      For one thing, they said it was the most stable, integrated and complete *free* desktop, so Windows and OS X don't count. However, I use KDE by choice at work even though I was encouraged to use Windows, could have used OS X and did try Gnome. I think KDE is more integrated than Windows or Gnome and is on par with OS X. Its features are second to none (Windows and OS X don't even compete with the features I use a lot, such as working with remote servers).

      I think it's important to remember that everybody uses their computer in different ways. KDE is great for me and a lot of other people and it pisses us off when a condescending jerk like you tries to blow it off as crap just because you heard it was bloated (but can't provide proof) and think it may be buggy (but can't list any more bugs in KDE than any other DE) and say it's poorly organized (even though it's all customizable).

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    3. Re:Kool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      /begin joke

      Yea KDE 3.5 is out! All I have to do now is wait 6-9 months for it to be available in portage!
       
      :)
       
      /end joke

    4. Re:Kool! by suso · · Score: 1

      Well the joke is on you. It was added to portage today. Er, you said available. Ok you're right.

    5. Re:Kool! by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm also a Gnome user (and XFCE on slower machines), but it is amazing to see what these folks are doing. I used KDE exclusively up until 3.1 or so and it has always gotten better with every release. In my view Gnome has only just surpassed it in the last few releases (though purely from a usability standpoint, which will vary from person to person), but in general all of the "big" projects tend to feed off of each other. When one improves the other does, and it's great to see it in action.

      I too have been a long time Linux user (originally used Mandrake 5.1, though I don't know how far back that was. I'm now using Gentoo). It's definately come a LONG ways since then.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:Kool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean before it hits "stable" in portage ;)

    7. Re:Kool! by c_fel · · Score: 1

      That said, I truly beleive KDE is the best desktop environment for a newbie. I set up three computers with Linux : for my brother, my girlfriend and my parents. None of them knew Linux before, and actually they are very pleased with their installation since the learning curve from Windows to KDE is very small. It is IMHO easier and cooler to configure and use a KDE desktop than any other free desktop when we are a newbie.

      --
      I hate all sigs, mine included.
    8. Re:Kool! by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      What does using a third party (rdesktop, vnc, etc) or built-in (ssh, telnet) app to work on remote servers have to do with an environment manager?

    9. Re:Kool! by Urusai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My beef with KDE is that there are no decent looking Qt themes. Why must they all be Keramik clones???

    10. Re:Kool! by naelurec · · Score: 5, Informative

      What does using a third party (rdesktop, vnc, etc) or built-in (ssh, telnet) app to work on remote servers have to do with an environment manager?

      Hmm.. he is talking about ioslaves .. its very cool -- you should check it out.. it allows KDE apps to utilize network resources (via smb, nfs, ssh, ftp and a LOT more..) as if they are local files (ie via save/open dialogs, drag and drop, etc..). Once you start using it, you REALLY miss it when working on other platforms.

    11. Re:Kool! by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      yeah, I really miss plan's file servers when I'm out of the environment

      like ioslaves but availble to every program as they are just files in your namespace, none of the smb:// business

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    12. Re:Kool! by naelurec · · Score: 1

      It is IMHO easier and cooler to configure and use a KDE desktop than any other free desktop when we are a newbie.

      Your selling it short. Its great for not only newbies, but advance users as well. There is a LOT in KDE including ioslaves, dcop, scripting, developer tools, kate (advanced text editor) and so much more that makes it very capable to be customized and optimized for a wide variety of users (very few limitations).

    13. Re:Kool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What fucking nob-end modded this as "insightful"... apparently, there are no bugs in KDE, only in X or the kernel (two projects that are just overflowing with talentless sloppy coders, after all). Or possibly it is hardware... after all, it was only tried on four different machines and three distros.

      All hail KDE! The perfect project. Any problems are not our fault.

    14. Re:Kool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stability aside, it was actually added to portage at least two days ago.

    15. Re:Kool! by zlogic · · Score: 1

      Gnome has a thing just like kioslaves - it's named gnomevfs.
      smb://server/share works nearly from any app...

    16. Re:Kool! by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Translation: "T think KDE is a crapfest, but instead of offering supporting data for my argument, I'm just going to rant a bit..."

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    17. Re:Kool! by Arandir · · Score: 1

      But Windows and OSX don't. That's the point.

      For a trivial example, consider FTP. Under Windows I need to get a third party shareware app (or use the command line) to use FTP. It's not integrated into the desktop. If I want to edit a webpage, I need to explicitly transfer the html file to the local machine and edit it here, then explicitly transfer it back. Under KDE it's so fully integrated into the desktop that FTP use is completely transparent. Another example: no need for an explicit audio ripper program, I merely drag and drop songs off of the CD and into my flash drive player.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    18. Re:Kool! by Arandir · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's time to wake up and join the world of 2005. Heck, wake up and join the world of 2004! Keramik is old hat. The new default theme is Plastik, which is wholly unlike Keramik. There's also Phase and Lipstik which are original themes and still wholly unlike Keramik (or Windows or Aqua). Then there's Baghira for your eye candy needs. Check out www.kde-look.org for dozens of high quality KDE themes.

      To repeat, Keramik is old. It's still there if you want it, but you're only showing your ignorance by bitching about it.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    19. Re:Kool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should anyone believe an Anonymous Coward?

    20. Re:Kool! by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      Windows and OS X don't even compete with the features I use a lot, such as working with remote servers

      Like what exactly? Everything I have used and needed with OS X 10.3 and now 10.4 has worked absolutely flawlessly. I'll repeat, flawlessly. That has included SSH/Telnet/FTP, Cisco VPN, Remote Desktop, Windows Virtual/Web Drives (shared over the internet/WAN), File/Printer Sharing in a Windows Domain, and much more. Everything I have setup in Linux to match the ease of use of an Apple OS X machine in a networked environment has proven to be a huge pain in the ass.

      What exactly on Linux makes its networking ease and power so much better than Apple OS X? If you say kioslaves/gfvs you've got to be kidding.

    21. Re:Kool! by zlogic · · Score: 1

      Yes, KDE's CD ripper simply rocks!
      When I first inserted a CD and it showed me a set of folders of .ogg, .cda, .wav files of the music on the CD and even a folder with CD data (Artist, album, etc.), my jaw dropped.
      I really didn't know my computer could be THAT easy to use. I like the "everything is a file" philosophy more and more.

    22. Re:Kool! by Hikaru79 · · Score: 1

      Yea KDE 3.5 is out! All I have to do now is wait 6-9 months for it to be available in portage!
      And only double that time for it to compile!

    23. Re:Kool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you were wanking when you wrote that.

    24. Re:Kool! by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that is basically unbelievable.

      X might crash, leaving your screen frozen and your computer inaccessible (unless you can login via ssh and kill X). I have had, on rare occasion, the taskbar/panel ('kicker') crash. No prob, switch to a terminal and just restart it ("kicker& ENTER") - I would like to see THAT on Windows, or OS X!

      The only possibility I can think of is the window manager crashing. But then, that is only because I have never seen it happen, so for all I know that makes it look like 'KDE crashed' ;) Other than that, it just isn't possible. There isn't such an application as 'KDE'. It is a window manager + taskbar + communication layer + a bunch of applications, all essentially independent. I leave my KDE desktop at work logged in for months at a time, and never have a problem with it.

    25. Re:Kool! by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      It's fairly trivial to restart services in OS X via the terminal. I think I had the Dock freeze up once, killed it in the terminal and it relaunched itself. Pretty much anything can be dealt with like that. I've unstuck a frozen Mac via ssh as well. It's fairly trivial stuff really.

    26. Re:Kool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you have said a good thing.

    27. Re:Kool! by imess · · Score: 1

      You can use Explorer to open ftp sites and do drag and drop. Not sure about open/save dialogs though, and certain won't work with ssh and a lot other protocols.

    28. Re:Kool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hack alert. This is the job of the operating system, not the desktop environment.

    29. Re:Kool! by kushal_kumaran · · Score: 1

      I've used gnomevfs. They sound similar. How is it different from KIOslaves?

    30. Re:Kool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kioslaves are more complete, and the work on any kde app.

    31. Re:Kool! by simon_c_heath · · Score: 1

      Under OSX, you can mount remote servers (SMB, NFS, FTP etc.) and they appear as a new disk on the desktop. They can then be accessed by *any* application (including from the command line). It's been a long time since I used KDE, but I can't see how it could be more integrated than this...

    32. Re:Kool! by tyrione · · Score: 1

      I noticed you didn't include OS X in your moronic rant, regarding FTP. FTP leverages Finder seemlessly with OS X. KDE's FTP is not as "seemless" as OS X's.

    33. Re:Kool! by Arandir · · Score: 1

      In KDE they don't appear as "disks" (I'm not sure what that means). You don't even need to mount them, just browse to them and they're there. FTP is just one example, there's also sftp, ssh, scp, as well as several specialized kioslaves (imap, audiocd, webdavs, etc).

      While I am somewhat familiar with Windows (and it's horrid anti-integration), I am less so with OSX. When I see my friend explicitly "publish" his webpage from within a specialized html editor, I can only assume that ftp access isn't completely transparent in OSX. To my mind, integration with ftp means you "save" your html just like any other file, and don't "publish" it.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    34. Re:Kool! by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Scolded by misspeelings...

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    35. Re:Kool! by simon_c_heath · · Score: 1

      When I said they appear as disks I should have said that they appear as mounted volumes. i.e., from the command line you will see them with the df or mount commands and you can cd to them. However you do have to perform the mount step (which can be done by the finder), you can't directly cd to a URL.

  2. What's that sound? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That sound you heard was the developer's Gears grinding away for this release.

    1. Re:What's that sound? by KiloByte · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's that sound?

      "award-winning" "the most complete, stable and integrated"

      To me, it sounds like a marketroid has somehow snuck in.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  3. Lopete link by Cougem · · Score: 5, Informative

    The link to Kopete actually links to Konqy. You want this.

  4. Let's just have one Linux desktop by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Competition and choice is great. It's also a barrier to entry for commercial software. And given that it's unrealistic to have all software be free, let's make it easier for linux adoption to take place. Let's have one desktop/widgetset/toolkit be the standard for X on Linux. One that's always deployed with X on Linux, so people have something to code to.

    All the whining about how choice is good and it makes better products distracts from a more important factor. All the competing options make incompatability and confusion unavoidable.

    1. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Gulthek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You speak as though Linux developers want to make it easy. Some do. Some don't. Some don't care. You can't really talk as though Linux is a cohesive business, for it is neither.

    2. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Mo6eB · · Score: 0, Troll

      This might happen eventually. Even now we have only 2 widget toolkits - Qt and gtk. The problem is that Qt is proprietary and this upsets some people. Also, we should have some sort of Open Source widget toolkit that we can fall back to when trolltech goes by the wayside, though they will probably just release Qt as Open Source then and we will see some merge between the two. For now, you just select the DE you like the most and install only the minimal number of components needed to run the other one's programs.

    3. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, umm, X does come with a standard window manager, it is called TWM...

    4. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Competition and choice is great. It's also a barrier to entry for commercial software."

      Correct on that one.

      "And given that it's unrealistic to have all software be free..."

      That is *not* a given. Many people involved with Linux and other Free software do not want non-free software to gain a large following on otherwise Free systems, and are not eager to do anything to encourage non-free Linux software.

      "Let's have one desktop/widgetset/toolkit be the standard for X on Linux".

      KDE and Gnome run apps written for the other just fine as long as the relevant libs are installed.

      Free software is about freedom. Saying "Let's agree on one desktop so users/developers won't get confused" is like saying "Let's agree on one political party so voters won't get confused".

    5. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, Qt has been GPL for a while. Stop the FUD.

    6. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Ngwenya · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem is that Qt is proprietary and this upsets some people. Also, we should have some sort of Open Source widget toolkit that we can fall back to when trolltech goes by the wayside, though they will probably just release Qt as Open Source

      Qt was released under the GPL a long while ago. You can license it for non-GPL applications, but then you have to pay TrollTech money. The "Qt is not free" myth is covered in the KDE Myths section: here

      --Ng
    7. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by hattig · · Score: 2

      There is one KDE desktop.

      And one Gnome desktop.

      And one FVWM desktop. and so on.

      Linux is just the kernel. X11 just a window manager. There are just several interfaces that run on top of these, and that is what the user or corporation selects, depending on their likes and dislikes.

      People have their own preferences. Give them a choice. Anyway it isn't as if they are programming it for money, it's their own time, so let them do what they want.

    8. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by haeger · · Score: 1, Interesting
      [snip]The problem is that Qt is proprietary...

      Trolltech licensing.

      Is it really? I was under the impression that it was Open Source. But then I'm not a lawyer and haven't been paying that much attention to it. They seem to mention GPL on that page though. But perhaps that's just the program that you write yourself with the Qt library, not the library itself.

      .haeger

      --
      You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    9. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by arkanoid.dk · · Score: 2, Insightful
      All the whining about how choice is good and it makes better products distracts from a more important factor. All the competing options make incompatability and confusion unavoidable.

      So basically, one has to decide: Is it better with several parallel applications, that allow for a lot of people to test many different implementations of features, to find those that work best, or is it better to put one, standardized desktop-application on top of the X-standard?
      Sure, it could allow for lesser confusion due to incompatibility, but this isn't a competition. This is about exploring different paths to satisfy the most users. I enjoy having the power of choice in regard to which window-manager I want to use, and I intend to keep this power, more than allowing some sort of monopoly on such an important part of the Linux system.

      --
      Arkanoid
      gethostbyintuition()... why not?
    10. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by baafie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, that's a lot of FUD in one post. I'm impressed.

      Even now we have only 2 widget toolkits - Qt and gtk.

      Not true; there are several alternatives.

      The problem is that Qt is proprietary and this upsets some people.

      Not true: QT3-X11 is available under the GNU GPL; QT4 is available under the GNU GPL even for windows. In addition to that, QT is available under proprietary licenses; this has no effect on the GPL release whatsoever.

      Also, we should have some sort of Open Source widget toolkit that we can fall back to when trolltech goes by the wayside, though they will probably just release Qt as Open Source then and we will see some merge between the two.
      QT already is open source.

      You should really do some research before you start spreading FUD. People like you give people like us a bad name.

    11. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one KDE desktop.

      And one Gnome desktop.

      And one FVWM desktop.

      And one kernel to rule them all

    12. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      The licensing for Qt could be a problem if it became the standard X widget set if is only either GPL or pay software (I'm not sure of the exact situation), as it would present a big hurdle to proprietary software on Linux. GTK is LGPL, so commercial apps can link to it without having to be open source themselves.

      And, no, not every company is going to release their software under the GPL.

    13. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by mw13068 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Competition and choice is great.

      Yes, it is.

      It's also a barrier to entry for commercial software.

      Are we creating Free Software for the users? or the developers of commercial software? Personally, I'd rather have freedom, and a wide array of options than a wide array of commercial (and most probably non-free) software. I don't care if commercial software developers have a hard time fitting in. Some will make the effort, and some won't. Either way, I won't use their products if they restrict my freedom to do as I like with it.

      And given that it's unrealistic to have all software be free, let's make it easier for linux adoption to take place.

      All software doesn't need to be free. But conversely, all software shouldn't be non-free either. Each user should be able to choose from a wide variety of options to best suit their own needs. And in my opinion, Free Software cares more about the user than non-free software. What good would wide "linux" adoption be if all the "linux" users were saddled by hundreds of non-free software package licenses? I care about the adoption of software freedom, not your interpretation of "linux".

      All the whining about how choice is good and it makes better products distracts from a more important factor. All the competing options make incompatability and confusion unavoidable.

      It sounds as though you're a software developer who hasn't got a real handle on the Free Software/Open-source development model, and therefore you're finding it hard to become rich and famous... Or perhaps you submitted a patch and have had it rejected, or something. Anyway, your OP seems like ax grinding.

      Join in the fun, or use a commercial (non-free) OS. But don't try to reduce the choice that other's enjoy.

    14. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Kjella · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, we should have some sort of Open Source widget toolkit that we can fall back to when trolltech goes by the wayside, though they will probably just release Qt as Open Source

      Also, to top that off the KDE foundation has an additional agreement that if "trolltech goes by the wayside", they get a completely unrestricted (as in BSD-like) license to the code. And Qt4 is now also GPL'd for Windows (always a source of confusion/FUD), previously only the X11/Mac version existed as open source.

      The only annoying thing is that the Windows/GPL version does not have compiler support for MS Visual C++, and the patches that are supposed to add that produce libraries that compile, but are flawed. I really wish KDevelop would come as Windows native, it's a brilliant counterpart on the Linux side (and yes, I know you can do Cygwin etc.)

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    15. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by TallMatthew · · Score: 1
      Competition and choice is great. It's also a barrier to entry for commercial software.

      Not really. Commercial software developers, Linux distributors and, ultimately, the consumers who buy their products, will choose which environment comes out on top. Witness VHS vs Betamax. The odd one out will dissipate. Being the most commercial Linux distro installs Gnome by default, that would seem to be the one that's been chosen.

      That doesn't mean KDE will disappear. Dissipate maybe, not not dissapear. I'm not sure how much of a market there is for commercial Linux software anyway, especially software that relies on desktop environment API.

    16. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Kjella · · Score: 1

      They seem to mention GPL on that page though. But perhaps that's just the program that you write yourself with the Qt library, not the library itself.

      I'm not sure if you're making fun of the parent or not, but it is GPL. It's quite impossible for your program to be GPL and Qt not, because the GPL requires that the work as a whole is licensed under the GPL. (technically, the Qt library could be under an even more liberal license like BSD or LGPL, but not a less liberal one)

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    17. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by FishandChips · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's never going to be a single Linux desktop but it's quite likely that a default one will emerge. A fair guess, which could easily turn out to be wrong, is that in a couple of years the majority of folks using Linux will find that their distro sets up Gnome for them before KDE, or at least sets up Gnome better than KDE. It only needs, say, the half dozen most popular distros to do this and the majority figure will get reached. At this point, yes, more and more developers may well decide to plump for GTK over QT-based but if they do it properly then their apps will still be perfectly good under KDE, as are Firefox or Thunderbird now.

      A single DE would kill off all sorts of innovation from the Linux platform as well as be a complete bummer for a lot of folks. I make extensive use of Xfce, for example, because it runs fast on an old machine I have and strikes me as all-round darn good anyway.

      Perhaps you were making this distinction between a de facto default DE emerging and there being only one DE availabe at all. And maybe the thundering herd has missed it. At any rate, I think you've been modded rather harshly.

      --
      Las qué passoun
      tournoun pas maï
    18. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      I don't think paying TrollTech for a QT license will be much of a problem for a company willing to release some propietary app. Think about windowsland, you usually have to pay for at least the IDE (say, visual studio), and they tend to be pretty expensive.. next to that, just using Kdevelop and friends for free, but paying for a QT license seems like a good deal to me, at least in theory.. does anyone know how much a license for QT costs?

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    19. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      A commercial licence for Qt is either $1800 or $3100 per developer, depending on whether you want the "enterprise" version or not, just for the licence to use Qt, compared to $299-$799 for Visual studio .net (depending on the version), for which you get a complete IDE, debugging and RAD system.

      You don't have to have Visual studio to develop software for windows, though.

    20. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      Sheesh.. seems the theory wasn't that good after all, then ;)
      Still, It'd be interesting to see a study about propietary-app development cost comparison between linux. windows, osx and whatnot, showing lib/compiler/ide/support/etc costs and the like...

      There's got to be one on the net.. I'll go back to my googling.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    21. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      I think Qt is a good product if you're doing cross-platform development: for $1800, it doesn't have to save much developer time spent porting before it becomes worthwhile. But for a single platform, it's quite a high entry cost for a small developer.

    22. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      A pox on your penguines. And your gnomes.

      I don't want a Ford, I want KDE in FreeBSD.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    23. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      "Let's agree on one political party so voters won't get confused"

      don't laugh. A lot of countries take this argument seriously.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    24. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Witness VHS vs Betamax

      You witness Ford vs GM. Clearly there is only room for one motor manufacturer.

      My other car is a Volvo FH12.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    25. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by idonthack · · Score: 1
      X11 just a window manager
      Actually, X11 is not the window manager. It's the display manager. TWM, FVWM, IceWM, etc are window managers. KDE and Gnome are destkop environments that also do window managing themselves.
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    26. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      One Gnome Desktop? Excuse be but there's more than one:

      • Sawfish
      • Metacity
      • IceWM also has Gnome support
      • Enlightenment used to be one as well
      • Not an extensive list, just the ones I've used.

        What's sad is considering all these choices, I still prefer KDE.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    27. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by m50d · · Score: 1

      One could make the same argument about the kernel itself. Except there you don't even have the option of paying to make a proprietary program using it.

      --
      I am trolling
    28. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Qt was released under the GPL a long while ago. You can license it for non-GPL applications, but then you have to pay TrollTech money. The "Qt is not free" myth is covered in the KDE Myths section: here

      Look, you know that, I know that and everyone else knows that. Even the parent troll knows that. The problem is that if you're a GNOME advocate like the parent, what else are you going to say to put down KDE?

      You can't complain about the performance with a straight face after you've used GNOME for any length of time.

      You can't complain about the applications unless you try and claim OpenOffice, Firefox and the GIMP as GNOME apps (and I have seen this done on many occasions).

      Complain about the design? No, try building GNOME from source.

      So all that they can do is whine about the non-existant license problem and that KDE is too configurable and has too many applications.

      I have actually seen GNOME advocates claim that GTK is better because it is easier to use in non-OSS commercial applications while simultaneously complaining about the QT license not being free enough. Anybody that can hold those two contradictory views in their head at the same time is hardly worth arguing with really.

    29. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Informative

      [snip]The problem is that Qt is proprietary...

      Its free for opensource, but if you want to sell your application you can buy a commerical license. I think this is awesome and allows Trolltech to have income to hire developers.

      QT licenses where an issue but not anymore, pick your license GPL or Commerical.

    30. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Klivian · · Score: 1

      A commercial licence for Qt is either $1800 or $3100 per developer

      And that's equals something like the cost of a decent developer for 1-2 weeks, making the price totally irrelevant for someone doing real commercial development.

    31. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Indeed, but it's a significant amount to ask when you get that for free on other platforms (xcode, free visual studio and compilers etc.)

    32. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's not even the display manager. It's simply a program that draws stuff on the screen and manages input from the user for a given console. The display manager is a program that provides a login screen and manages/starts all displays/X servers on a single machine.

    33. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by hattig · · Score: 1

      Oops, yes. I blame TooMuchJavaException.

    34. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Let's just have one Linux desktop

      Sure, go for it! You Linux users can do whatever you want. In the meantime I'll be using KDE with FreeBSD.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    35. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should really do some research before you start spreading FUD.

      You're supposed to follow that with "I always do".

    36. Re:Let's just have one Linux desktop by bhalo05 · · Score: 0

      Thank you so much. No KDE announcement is ever complete without some ignorant or troll talking FUD about the damn-evil-propietary Qt's license. Now we're all done here.

  5. My *personal* Screenshots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:My *personal* Screenshots! by ZiakII · · Score: 1

      Anyone notice that the copyright says 2004? and not 2005?

    2. Re:My *personal* Screenshots! by HappyCakeOven · · Score: 1, Funny

      Finally, someone integrated time travel in a desktop environment. I can retire the DeLorean now.

      --
      It makes real cupcakes, with a 40 watt bulb, and there's icing packets....but the secret ingredient is love.
  6. YAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I for one welcome our new stable desktop overlords :)

    1. Re:YAY by Daedala · · Score: 1

      Stable overlords? Now that's a GREAT idea! I'm getting tired of the unstable nutjob kind.

      --
      What I say does not represent the views of my employers, my friends, my cats, or myself.
  7. It's About Frickin Time!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is about frickin time that open source IM clients integrated voice and video. Congratulations to Kopete and KDE for implementing this LONG OVERDUE feature. Welcome to the 2000 chat world.

    1. Re:It's About Frickin Time!!! by arafel · · Score: 1

      You actually use this? I don't think I know anyone who actually *uses* video or voice over IM.

    2. Re:It's About Frickin Time!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMSN has it since some months ago, welcome to the real world.

    3. Re:It's About Frickin Time!!! by arafel · · Score: 1

      I didn't ask whether other services had it, I asked whether the OP used it, or knew of people who did. Like I said, I don't know of anyone who's used voice/video in IM.

  8. Webcam - yes! by Zoidmann · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The missing ability to use a webcam easily under KDE, is actually an argument for some people I know to stick with Windows. So this is great news - now I might convince them into actually trying this "Linux-thing", so I can stop supporting their infected Windows XP Home machines (yes, then I would have to support them with Linux, but with a little help from CrossOver they can keep using most of the software they are dependant upon).

    I haven't got a webcam myself at the moment, so I have no idea how it works in Kopete. If you have tested it, and can recommend a webcam that is working nicely under Linux, I would like to hear about it. Are there webcams out for Linux that actually support face-tracking?

    1. Re:Webcam - yes! by Digital+Warfare · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Kopete webcam support is nothing new, Mercury - www.mercury.to the java based messenger (admittadly for MSN only) has had Webcam support for a while :) and I prefer the original smilies ;)

      --
      "Sweet llamas of the Bahamas !"
    2. Re:Webcam - yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well sure, Mercury is quite nice. I've used it for a while myself. But the amount of RAM that it uses is really inexcusable.

      Still, it's a very cool Java app.

    3. Re:Webcam - yes! by Zoidmann · · Score: 1

      Kopete webcam support is nothing new

      But it's a new thing it's included as standard - I have read about versions of Kopete that should work with webcams before, just never the "official" branch. (You have to love OSS sometimes).

      www.mercury.to the java based messenger (admittadly for MSN only)

      Hm, I just read on their page that they will start supporting Jabber as well... still, I like using Kopete, so it's very unlikely I will change to another IM, unless they start getting broken protocols so chatting becomes impossible with users on MSN. But hey, sometimes it does break for some days after "upgrades" by Microsoft, so I might give this Mercury a try sometime :-)

    4. Re:Webcam - yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Are there webcams out for Linux that actually support face-tracking?

      There's the experimental one that requires some help to work right.

      1. You must paint your face white so that it has enough contrast.

      2. You need to put a red ball on your nose to give it something to track.

      3. You need to highlight around your eyes and mouth, else all the other users will just see a red dot in the middle of a white screen.

      Oh, and it's called "bozo-cam".

    5. Re:Webcam - yes! by big_groo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Be careful which webcam you buy. The Logitech Quickcam Messenger is a Windows only POS. The chipset is incompatible, IIRC. I have the Logitech Quickcam Pro 4000, and it runs like a champ in Gnomemeeting. If you want a really good cam, get the iSight - it works under linux. From what I recall, most of the head tracking stuff is Windows only. Can't wait to try this out tonight - we'll see how it works from Linux->Windows and Linux->Mac.

    6. Re:Webcam - yes! by malsdavis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "included as standard" is important.

      Too often, Linux suffers from great applications and features being available to those willing to spend 5 hours trawling every project hosting website then spend several hours getting the 101 dependancy issues sorted out and then go make dinner while the whole thing compiles. ...all to find out the software/feature is so immature or buggy even the most basic features requires a host of newly learnt commands and techniques.

      The bueaty of the KDE enviroment (and gnome for that matter) is the way so much stuff just works as expected without requiring the user to learn a range of commands & techniques which should have been left back in the 1970's. Sure, Webcam support on Linux may not be a totally new thing to us "nerds" that frequent Slashdot, but as someone who has spent days getting a Webcam to partly work (within Kopete and elsewhere), I would have to agree that with the new Kopete in KDE 3.5 it will be the first time Linux is able to realisticly claim to support Webcams.

    7. Re:Webcam - yes! by daeley · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, and it's called "bozo-cam".

      Not KlownKam? ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    8. Re:Webcam - yes! by m50d · · Score: 1

      I've got a logitech quickcam usb and it works a treat. Didn't have to go to any effort, just plug it in, install the package and it works. (well actually I had to recompile my kernel for V4L support, but only because it's a custom one and I left it out.) I'll be testing it in kopete as soon as my distro marks kde 3.5 stable.

      --
      I am trolling
    9. Re:Webcam - yes! by temojen · · Score: 1

      I hope it works with video4linux. I use an old (studio type) video camera and a video capture board (Bt878) that works with Video4Linux. If it uses Video4Linux, just about any webcam (almost) should work. That iSight suggestion is crazy though... $200 for a webcam? no.

    10. Re:Webcam - yes! by Wellspring · · Score: 1

      Too often, Linux suffers from great applications and features being available to those willing to spend 5 hours trawling every project hosting website then spend several hours getting the 101 dependancy issues sorted out and then go make dinner while the whole thing compiles. ...all to find out the software/feature is so immature or buggy even the most basic features requires a host of newly learnt commands and techniques.

      YES.

      This has been a continuing problem with Open Source software. I'm a big proponent of it, but this is a major issue. Apart from the top-drawer core applications like OpenOffice, Apache, etc, it is very hard to tell which projects are viable and which ones aren't without extensive googling and combing through forums on a variety of sites.

      You can do all kinds of things, if you're willing to do the leg work of researching, working out dependencies and config files, and installing plug-ins. This is a problem with software in general, but open source software in particular is very hard to configure for everyday use unless you're "in the scene" and therefore can pickup the folklore on what you need and how to get it.

      I have a very good friend who is very proud of his Linux expertise. He's a major figure on forums for answering linux questions, he has dozens of machines running different distros, etc etc. He's proud that he can get anything to work given time. Sometimes, you need to escalate to a guy like this to get something running. But if you're doing it for your 'bullet-point' features, or worse for core functionality, then you don't have a working product yet, you have a prototype.

      I know everyone beats this drum, but good defaults and proper packaging is critical to making the software work. Just because something is possible in an academic sense doesn't mean that it is viable for home or business use.

    11. Re:Webcam - yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the main thing keeping people off Kopete in the U.S. is that it does not support group chat in AIM. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77181

    12. Re:Webcam - yes! by labratuk · · Score: 1
      Are there webcams out for Linux that actually support face-tracking?


      You'll probably find that all the face tracking is done in software. Which runs on windows.

      But you're welcome to develop your own Free face tracking system. There are plenty of Free image analysis libraries available to start with. Such as the OpenCV Toolkit.
      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    13. Re:Webcam - yes! by delirium_9 · · Score: 1

      I keep Windows on my computer exclusively for MSN video chat (and CivIV). If I can get a linux alternative that actually works then I won't have to reboot my computer just to chat. And having no legit excuse to go into Windows I won't play CivIV and my grades will improve.

      OSS is making my life better every day.

      --
      Since your UID is smaller than mine, I can only conclude that you're trolling. -s20451 (410424)
    14. Re:Webcam - yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the logitech quickcam messenger does work with linux, but you'll need to patch your kernel in order to use it. I got one set up on a gentoo box, and the picture is pretty good, but I couldn't get the mic working at all.

      http://home.mag.cx/messenger/

    15. Re:Webcam - yes! by xerxesdaphat · · Score: 1

      Ach... Mercury. Yeah I used it for a while, because it supports so many of the advanced features of MSN Plus! enabled MSN Messenger client (big display pics, custom emoticons etc). But (because it is Java based? I don't know) it chews up massive amounts of system resources and is quite slow and unresponsive. Plus, (and this is definitely because it is Java based because I saw it on their forums), it can't do things like flash the taskbar button for a window when you receive a new message when the window is not focused, because apparently this is not something you can do via Java under GNOME or KDE. I will have to investigate this Kopete thing... atm I am using Gaim, but it doesn't support several of the nicer features of standard MSN client.

      --
      The Shoes of the Fisherman's Wife Are Some Jive Ass Slippers
    16. Re:Webcam - yes! by Digital+Warfare · · Score: 0

      I found the slowness quite annoying too, but, using the default skin it seems to handle it self fine :)

      --
      "Sweet llamas of the Bahamas !"
    17. Re:Webcam - yes! by big_groo · · Score: 1

      My bad. It's been awhile since I looked into it.
      http://www.leenooks.com/184

      At one point, it didn't work. At all. I know, cause I bought one (cheap 20 bucks).

  9. Great work by geo_2677 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The features seem to be pretty impressive. Now, not only do we have a two good browsers for Linux desktop, the healthy competition between FF and Konqueror will only make them richer. The ACL GUI feature is certainly a good enhancement.
    Way to go KDE!!

    1. Re:Great work by Xarius · · Score: 1

      *cough*

      Not to sound like a zealot, but we have at least four decent browser, Firefox, Konqueror, Opera and Galeon.

      --
      C17H21NO4
    2. Re:Great work by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      And what rendering engine does Galeon use? Mozilla's Gecko. That's still only three browsers Konqueror, Mozilla-based (Firefox, Galeon, Epiphany), and Opera.

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    3. Re:Great work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you did forget Dillo.

    4. Re:Great work by fishbot · · Score: 1

      The rendering engine maketh not the browser. As I recall, Galeon was first with tabs, and Firefox is more expandable than either of the other two through the extensions. The point you've made is that there a loads of good open source browsers :)

    5. Re:Great work by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      I know. I used Galeon up until Pheonix (old name for Firefox) was released.

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
  10. KDE.org mirror by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sicne it seems like Kde.org has taken somewhat of a hit, here is a mirror for it: http://kde.mirror.fr/

    1. Re:KDE.org mirror by myspys · · Score: 4, Informative

      too bad that mirror isn't up-to-date

      here's a link via mirrordot for the visual guide: http://mirrordot.org/stories/e5a9203473858cda85ab8 111baf58ccb/index.html

    2. Re:KDE.org mirror by lonesometrainer · · Score: 1
  11. Already slashdotted! by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The site is already slashdotted. I will have to slow down a bit, till all the rush has calmed down. Meanwhile, let the rest of the Slashdot community begin the flames here on slashdot.

    Anyone here using KOffice in a "real world" environment? The last time I attempted using it, I found it had tonnes of bugs!

    1. Re:Already slashdotted! by vdboor · · Score: 1
      Anyone here using KOffice in a "real world" environment? The last time I attempted using it, I found it had tonnes of bugs!

      KOffice has a separate release, so it's not included with KDE 3.5. The upcoming version of KOffice looks promising, with better ODF support, better GUI tools, etc.. But I don't use KOffice yet either, maybe the new version will be good enough to make a switch.

      --
      The best way to accelerate a windows server is by 9.81 m/s2 ;-)
    2. Re:Already slashdotted! by digidave · · Score: 1

      "Anyone here using KOffice in a "real world" environment? The last time I attempted using it, I found it had tonnes of bugs!"

      I primarily use OpenOffice.org 2.0, but keep KOffice around because it's very fast and seems to work well. I may be able to replace OOo with KOffice if I bothered trying to figure out how to do the same things. OOo has an excellent dialog for parsing fixed-width delimited files in Calc and their Save as CSV dialog is second to none.

      KOffice is good, but with OOo 2.0 around it always seems like my second choice. I have actually been able to use it to open a few XLS files that Calc wouldn't open.

      Now, if there was just an easy way to get rid of that 65536 row limit, I'd be all set.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    3. Re:Already slashdotted! by robgamble · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I used the KMail / contact / calendar app for 2 months straight and found it to be very stable and reliable. It was also a TON faster than Evolution.

      --
      No sig for you!
    4. Re:Already slashdotted! by bogaboga · · Score: 1
      > I used the KMail / contact / calendar app for 2 months straight and found it to be very stable and reliable. It was also a TON faster than Evolution.

      Well, in my case running the latest stable Kubuntu, I found that I could not use KMail launched from Kontact! There was this missing library whose name I cannot remember right now. Googling did not help either!

    5. Re:Already slashdotted! by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      That's part of kdepim, not koffice.

    6. Re:Already slashdotted! by molnarcs · · Score: 1
      I switched from oo when 1.4.2 came out (with some bugfixes to odt support). Works fine, and I like the integration (into the desktop, and the other parts of koffice - I use kword mostly). I rarely use tables in my documents, and that's where most of the issues lie with kword - or at least it did in the past.

      Someone mentioned konqi as a viable alternative now for ff ... indeed, konqi has been an excellent browser in the 3.4.x series already: easy on resources, and fast as hell. But to become a real competitor, it needs to be ported to windows. With QT4, that would probably happen. What we really need is lightweight, feature rich and modern Office competitor, and koffice could become one. It is already being ported to qt4 and windows (I saw a demo of kexi on windows). Karbon and Krita received a lot of attention lately, and it shows. Krita is beginning to replace GIMP for me here: it has a very nice and usable UI, lots of features (excellent layer control). Karbon has come a long way as well - it is not yet a viable replacement for Inkscape, but it's getting there. Now only if the rest of the office suite received the same amount of attention ... I know, I know: developers, developers, developers :))

      Another nice app is Scribus! It is the best free desktop publishing application, and it is relatively easy to use. It is also needs more marketing I think - there is simply no free software alternative for scribus, yet I haven't heard about it until a month ago. After installing it I was absolutely surprised at its quality!

    7. Re:Already slashdotted! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Anyone here using KOffice in a "real world" environment?

      Sort of - I use it to print dictation that our transcriptionist sends to us. I have exactly two problems that keep me from switching permanently:

      1. I want a way to set the default font on imported documents. I don't know what font our transcriptionist uses, but it's not Times New Roman or anything else KWord can identify. I wish there was an "open all documents like this with this font" setting.
      2. The horrible, horrible printed kerning. Honestly, printed documents look awful. The inter-character spacing is completely hosed. It's good enough to print legal documents that don't have to look pretty, but I'd never use it for an article or resume.

      If those two shortcomings were addressed, I'd switch today. I can understand the first one not being critical (although it's vitally interesting to everyone who's used to manually selecting all and setting the font every time they import a Word doc), but the second is kind of a dealbreaker. A word processor that can't print nicely isn't widely useful.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  12. What I didn't see by Hoplite3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm a big KDE fan, and KDE has really improved since 3.4 when the new series just gelled. 3.5 promises to be more awesome. I especially look forward to konqueror improvements, as it's my browser of choice. I really appreciate its speed, especially on lower-end systems. Plus, it uses the KDE file picker that I find easier to use than the gnome one with firefox.

    What I didn't see was much change in KDE's horrible default settings. The desktop is very configurable. Why does it have to look like some terrible pudgy windows clone? And what's with two toolbars on every app? Why not save some screen real estate for the body of the application? That toolbar for konqueror could easily be paired down to one row of icons with the location bar along side. I'm sick of a print icon on every application. I print things rarely enough off the web. That should be left to a menu, or just alt-p.

    Still, if you're willing to configure KDE a little bit, it's awesome. The good news is that much of the configuration is easy, right-click kind of stuff.

    --
    Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
    1. Re:What I didn't see by aesiamun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes because KDE was designed with you and only you in mind. No one else prints...NEVER! How can the KDE people be so thoughtless as to include something as useless as a printer button.

      I hate KDE! Damn them for making useful stuff. :(

    2. Re:What I didn't see by 10Ghz · · Score: 4, Informative
      What I didn't see was much change in KDE's horrible default settings.


      KDE4 is what you need. Not only are there some serious usability-improvements, polishing, cleaning and other improvements in the pipeline (yes, seriously. Lots of KDE-devels seem to be fed up with the clutter), there seems to be some really low-level changes thought of as well.

      Good things come to those who wait, and KDE4 will deliver lots of goodies. KDE3.5 is "just" an extension of KDE3.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    3. Re:What I didn't see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually really like Firefox's file save dialogue under Gnome.
      I have bookmarks in it for all my commonly used save folders (src, rpms, dev, docs, work, ...), so instead of getting a normal save dialogue showing 50 folders that I rarely use and a bunch of files I don't need to be seeing, I can just select one of my bookmarks and hit Save. On the 1% chance that I don't want to save something in one of my bookmarks, I can just click the 'Browse for other folders' drop down and get a normal save dialogue.

    4. Re:What I didn't see by squoozer · · Score: 1

      You've got to admit he's got a point though. Even my parents have started to give up trying to print the Internet out so things must be changing for the better. Think how many trees we could save by simply removing that one little button.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    5. Re:What I didn't see by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Why does it have to look like some terrible pudgy windows clone?"

      So as not to scare off the pudgy Windows users.

      KFG

    6. Re:What I didn't see by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      My boss prints webpages and draws on them...it's like watching a child at pizza hut color the placemats...

      People do still print things though.

    7. Re:What I didn't see by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      I hope, I *really* hope that KDE4 won't bring the same dumbing down as GNOME 2.x did in the name of "usability".

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    8. Re:What I didn't see by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between "dumbing down" and "improving usability". Improving usability can mean that the not-so-often used features and options are moved out of sight so that the features and options that ARE more often used, are highlighted and more accessible. The features and options would still be there, they just wouldn't be prominently displayed (and drawing users attention). If the UI displays all the possible options and features all the time, the relevant information is buried underneath the clutter. But if the trivial things are moved elsewhere, the important things get the limelight.

      KDE has always been featureful and configurable. And I don't think the developers are willing to drop that legacy. What they ARE interested in, is to make the system make sense, and be gorgerous and usable by default.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    9. Re:What I didn't see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it hurt to click the drop-down menu?

    10. Re:What I didn't see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amongst other things, one good reason is that changes within a major release line (KDE 3) are avoided if possible. The defaulting to Plastik style instead of Konqueror was a new one.

      This is in part to avoid having to recreate all the screenshots in documentation, for example.

    11. Re:What I didn't see by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatley, even if KDE ships with a very usable desktop (IMHO, the current defaults are acceptable), the distros will still bastardize it to the point that it feels like a cheap ripoff of an old version of Windows.

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    12. Re:What I didn't see by Arandir · · Score: 1

      I print to PDF all the time.

      p.s. Besides, I like getting rid of trees. Especially those nasty trees raised on a farm for the paper industry. Renewal resources are so eeeevil!

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    13. Re:What I didn't see by Columcille · · Score: 1

      *hugs gentoo*

      --
      I love my sig.
  13. Cool! by Omicron32 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Congratulations KDE team!

    Now, knowing Gentoo this will be in the tree in the next 5 minutes. Woo, emerge is gonna be hot tonight, and tomorrow, and the day after, and probably some time after that too.... ;)

    (Disclaimer: I use Gentoo, it doesn't actually take that long with kdeenablefinal flag on!)

    1. Re:Cool! by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      knowing Gentoo this will be in the tree in the next 5 minutes.

      Actually, it's been in the tree since before the release. If you unmasked them and tried to emerge them, portage would just complain that it couldn't download any of the distfiles.

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    2. Re:Cool! by digidave · · Score: 1

      "knowing Gentoo this will be in the tree in the next 5 minutes"

      Kubuntu already has it, just as they've released the beta and RC releases the same day as release.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    3. Re:Cool! by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when will they mark it as stable?

      Also, what does kdeenablefinal do?

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    4. Re:Cool! by Omicron32 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as I know, it does some black voodoo magic and combines all the C++ source files into one file before compiling for a rather large speedup, or something. The downside is it uses a LOT of RAM (apparently) but I haven't noticed a problem on my laptop (2.6GHz, 512MB RAM, 1GB Swap). Compiled kdelibs, libkdeedu (or something), kstars and arts in about an hour yesterday using kdeenablefinal.

      I'd say, if you've got 512MB RAM or more, enable it.

    5. Re:Cool! by vdboor · · Score: 1
      Now, knowing Gentoo this will be in the tree in the next 5 minutes. Woo, emerge is gonna be hot tonight, and tomorrow, and the day after, and probably some time after that too.... ;)

      I never really understood why people always have to mention Gentoo already has it. SuSE also updated their supplementary mirrors for example. The huge difference is, you don't have to compile for hours to get the updates. For SuSE download time == update time. In Gentoo it takes another day before you can enjoy KDE 3.5... :-)

      --
      The best way to accelerate a windows server is by 9.81 m/s2 ;-)
    6. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "black, voodoo magic" is used here at work to get faster compiles as well.
      It's called a giant include file with the extention .cpp that includes all your other .cpp files. :)

    7. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why does it take Gentoo months after everyone else to roll out the newest version of GNOME then?

    8. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Gnome is a very difficult thing to build from source, which speaks volumes about its inner organisation. Codewise, it is a house of cards.

    9. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled kongratulations! ;-)

    10. Re:Cool! by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I never really understood why people always have to mention Gentoo already has it.

      For the same reason other people mention their distro has it?

      http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169644&c id=14137480

      Only people like you don't bitch about it when *they* do it...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    11. Re:Cool! by glowworm · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because we have bigger e-dicks than you pre-packaged guys ;-).

      Real Linux Operators roll their own, Wanna-be's use the Microsoft model and just download a binary (plus 1,000 dependancies that invariably break each other).

      Besides, with ccache installed the actual compile time on my Gentoo Boxen was actually only about 30 minutes, which I spent reading my email.

      Over the next few months I will easily make that time back as my version of KDE 3.5 is now fully optimised to use all my processors features.

      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
  14. Re:troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for most people the discussion of whether it's best to have a single desktop is old old old, and it is clear that having multiple desktops is better than having one.

    maybe you're new, or maybe you just haven't thought it through enough. or maybe you're trolling.

  15. Mod Parent Down! by Omicron32 · · Score: 2, Informative

    QT has been released under the GPL for years.

  16. Breakthrough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KDE has made an exciting breakthrough in its support for removable devices. On detection of specific media types KDE presents the user with a list of optional actions. These actions are configurable in KDE's control center and can be disabled entirely. This goes a great deal of the way toward fixing an old complaint, that managing removable media is too difficult in Linux, by exposing existing features in KDE and Linux to the user in an obvious fashion.


    How is that a breakthrough? It's a direct copy from XP. But anyway it's nice to see KDE advancing, still a bit too clunky for me but the more decent free desktops there are the better.

    1. Re:Breakthrough? by emidln · · Score: 1

      Actually, it appears that this is a direct copy from OS X. Good try and thanks for playing though! ;)

    2. Re:Breakthrough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Gnome has had this for a number of years. Personally I prefer autofs + udev.

    3. Re:Breakthrough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Gnome but I recall XP having it first, I may be wrong though. It's a feature that quickly pissed me off in both so I have it set to just open a window at the root of the removable device, and for CDs on XP do nothing.

    4. Re:Breakthrough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      out of curiosity, what number of years would that be exactly? 1?

  17. Visual Guide Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Visual Guide Mirror by oglueck · · Score: 1

      Coral here

  18. Kould you kindly kan the naming konvention? by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kareless konnotation kauses konsiderable konsternation.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Kould you kindly kan the naming konvention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lame naming konvention: khekk.

    2. Re:Kould you kindly kan the naming konvention? by ivan+kk · · Score: 0

      Surely kyou meant knaming konvention.

    3. Re:Kould you kindly kan the naming konvention? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      How long were you waiting to post that one?

      --
      evil is as evil does
  19. Timed Out by Professional+Heckler · · Score: 1

    The kde server timed out. I suggest they commit some more bandwidth if they are going to take on all the /. users.

  20. Google Maps and Blogger by p0z3r · · Score: 5, Informative

    Two things.. if you want google maps to work, you have to add a user agent for maps.google.com/local.google.com to Konqueror as Safari.
    If you want blogger.com to not post blank blog entries, add a user agent for www.blogger.com to Konqueror as Firefox.

    Now email google to fix both of them so we don't have to do these silly workarounds.

    1. Re:Google Maps and Blogger by chrismcdirty · · Score: 1

      Also, if you like to be able to click on links, add a user agent for mail.google.com to Konqueror as Mozilla/Firefox.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    2. Re:Google Maps and Blogger by digidave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Now email google to fix both of them so we don't have to do these silly workarounds."

      I did email Google about that issue (I emailed Google Local because that's where I was at the time. Same problem there). I simply asked that they add Konqueror's user agent to the supported browsers after stating that the browser did work when I switched the user agent. This is their response.

      --------------
      local-help@google.com to me
      Nov 17

      Thank you for your note. It appears that you're having trouble using
      Google Local because you're using a browser that is not fully supported.
      In order to obtain full functionality of Google Local, please use one of
      the supported browsers listed in our Help Center at
      http://local.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answ er=16532&topic=1499

      We appreciate your taking the time to send us your feedback regarding the
      use of Konqueror with Google Local. We'll keep your comments in mind as we
      continue to make improvements to this service.

      Regards,
      The Google Team
      ---------------------

      Utterly frustrating. Sounds like a bot may have wrote that :(

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    3. Re:Google Maps and Blogger by p0z3r · · Score: 1

      That's about the same canned response I got when I filled out their feedback form as well. Someday they'll update it I hope.

    4. Re:Google Maps and Blogger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much for "Do no evil", eh?

      I honestly don't understand why everyone is so in love with google.

    5. Re:Google Maps and Blogger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Utterly frustrating. Sounds like a bot may have wrote that :(

      Nonsense.

      I believe with all my heart that Google personally responds to the millions of emails they receive daily.

      Praise the almighty Google.

    6. Re:Google Maps and Blogger by massysett · · Score: 1

      Any way to get Gmail working in Konqueror? (Not just the crippled Gmail, but the full-featured one.)

    7. Re:Google Maps and Blogger by p0z3r · · Score: 1

      Yes, it appears that you can make a user agent for mail.google.com and set it as Safari similar to maps/local.
      It works for me at least.

    8. Re:Google Maps and Blogger by alienmole · · Score: 1

      What on earth does not supporting Konqueror (yet?) have to do with being evil? That said, the idea that one of the most richly capitalized public companies on the planet will be able to live up to the promise to do no evil is laughable.

      Just ask anyone who's dealt with e.g. Google's trademark enforcement lawyers just how friendly and non-evil they are.

    9. Re:Google Maps and Blogger by Kenyon · · Score: 1

      Like a post says above, set Konqueror to send the Firefox user agent for Gmail.

  21. You don't like it. DON'T INSTALL IT. Simple, non ? by Chaffar · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Obviously, if you don't like it, don't install it... that's the beauty of Open source... CHOICE... Something 'Doze users wouldn't know about.

    "Call me a troll"

    Consider it done...

  22. Notable changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    • Konqueror is the second major web browser to pass the Acid2 CSS test, ahead of Firefox and Internet Explorer
    • Konqueror can also free webpages from adverts with its new ad-block feature
    • SuperKaramba is included in KDE, providing well-integrated and easy-to-install widgets for the user's desktop
    • Kopete has support for MSN and Yahoo! webcams
    • The edutainment module has three new applications (KGeography, Kanagram and blinKen), and has seen huge improvements in Kalzium
    1. Re:Notable changes by demachina · · Score: 1

      A feature I'd like to know about is if Google IM is supported in Kopete. That was something missing in the months old 3.4 I run because of course it didn't exist when I built KDE 3.4 months ago. I guess I will find out as soon as I download and compile.

      --
      @de_machina
    2. Re:Notable changes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  23. only one widgetset? why? by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's have one desktop/widgetset/toolkit be the standard for X on Linux

    You don't need a "single widgetset/toolkit" to make a great "user experience".

    Windows actually has several widget implementations. Access has its own widget set (don't remember the link, sorry), IE has its own widget set, office has its own widget set (noticed how the scrolling bar in office is like windows 98 instead of looking like in the XP theme? The same happens for messenger BTW)

    They don't have a "single" widget implementation - they just have several widget implementations which LOOK THE SAME. In the same way, you don't need gtk OR qt - you want a way to make them look the same (the usability guidelines like menus etc are another matter). Implement the same theme for both desktops and make kde swwitch to a different look when you change the gnome theme and viceversa and you're done.

  24. slashdotted??? by Danzigism · · Score: 0

    did kde.org get slashdotted?? the screenshots looks great.. they keep getting better thats for sure.. i'm looking forward to using the new version.. so tough to choose between gnome and kde..

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
    1. Re:slashdotted??? by bogaboga · · Score: 1
      > ...the screenshots looks great.. they keep getting better thats for sure...

      But I am still unhappy with the tool bars in Konqueror. Why won't the developers merge these? There is still lots of screen real-estate being "wasted." The default Firefox 1.0.7 layout is OK in my view. Buttons for incresing/decreasing font size and the "find" button should not be on the default layout. Anyone that needs these can add them later.

    2. Re:slashdotted??? by idonthack · · Score: 1
      Anyone that needs these can add them later.
      Or anyone that doesn't need them can remove them later.
       
      They're not developing KDE for only you, remember?
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  25. Re:troll? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1, Informative

    I can run Qt/KDE programs under Gtk/GNOME, and vise versa. A developer need only select the toolkit/desktop that best fulfills their development needs.

  26. Kubuntu packages available by ganache · · Score: 2, Informative

    KDE 3.5 packages have been released for Kubuntu http://kubuntu.org/announcements/kde-35.php

    --

    It was a century of answers and all of them have been wrong...
    Wake me in a thousand years
  27. Filterset? by Vo0k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if the adblocker from Konqueror is compatibile with firefox Adblock.

    (...As you've certainly noticed...) Adblock by itself is worthless. Its empty filter base makes it inactive and only weeks of careful building it would make the extension normally useful. Only combined with a good killfile like Filterset.G it really kicks ass, at once. Same applies to any other adblocker - what filters are available for Konqueror?

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Filterset? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I wonder if the adblocker from Konqueror is compatibile with firefox Adblock.

      Yes, it is.

    2. Re:Filterset? by the+plant+doctor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Export Firefox Adblock filters. Import in Konqueror.

  28. Let's just have one..desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why wait for Linux to do it? It's not the only game in town.

  29. Let's just have one Language by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

    Competition and choice is great. It's also a barrier to entry for children growing up. And given that it's unrealistic to have all languages be understandable, let's make it easier for language adoption to take place. Let's have one culture/language/religion be the standard for people on earth. One that everyone on earth follows, so people have something in common.

    All the whining about how choice is good and it makes life better distracts from a more important factor. All the competing viewpoints make incompatability and confusion unavoidable.

    1. Re:Let's just have one Language by joelsanda · · Score: 1

      Let's have one culture/language/religion be the standard for people on earth

      Which language? English? Latin? Esperanto? Let's have one culture/language/religion be the standard for people on earth. Homogenous is great for milk, not so good for culture and people.

      --
      The Luddites were ahead of their time.
    2. Re:Let's just have one Language by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      It's a joke. See the comment I was responding to.

    3. Re:Let's just have one Language by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Thats remember me of the story of eskimos having a hundred names for snow. More than that being truth or not, the idea is that having just one language you miss a lot of the expresiveness of current languages, all of them. Also, if you born language in a way or another influence how you think, probably you will missing a lot more than just meaningful words unifying that. And probably all of this can be applied very closely to desktop environments.

    4. Re:Let's just have one Language by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      They might have hundreds of words for snow; we have adjectives.

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    5. Re:Let's just have one Language by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      Obviously the language of choice would be Klingon...

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    6. Re:Let's just have one Language by tacocat · · Score: 1

      ebonics... Then no one will know what the fuck anyone is saying and we'll all just "pop a nine"...

  30. Looks like KDE is short on funds! by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Because it appears that their Pentium II 233 box with 32 megs of RAM isn't quite cutting it as their web server for kde.org. :)

    1. Re:Looks like KDE is short on funds! by bad+jerkface · · Score: 0

      The Black Angus called. They want their crappy server back.

      --
      It's a hand twinkler, you dumbass! And I got a bag of whoopass for you!
    2. Re:Looks like KDE is short on funds! by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if they ran a lighter WM instead of KDE it might help ;P

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
  31. Windows lookalike? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why is KDE3.5 looking more and more like Windows? For instance with the insertion of a medium: what do you want me to do with it? This isn't user friendly, this is idiot-proof with more steps to reach your goal. Digg had a good article on that (comparing Windows vs Linux with Bike vs Car).

    1. Re:Windows lookalike? by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Digg had a good article on that (comparing Windows vs Linux with Bike vs Car).

      No, I think you'll find that Digg had a one line link to a probably ancient article that someone else wrote about Windows vs Linux followed by about 50 one line comments from the chronically retarded.

      Of course I am extrapolating this from my last visit to Digg. I'd love to go back and see if I'm right, but I can actually feel my IQ dropping 10 points every time the front page loads.

    2. Re:Windows lookalike? by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you have a better idea? They aren't doing what windows is doing because they want to be like windows, they are doing it because it's a good idea. I like the command line, but if I have to switch to the command line, figure out which device is associated with my usb key, sudo mount my usb key, sudo copy and write files, sudo umount, that's simply unacceptable. I should be able to plug my key in and just use it like another mounted drive like my other hard drives or CD/DVDs. Granted, I've automated all this by writing a shell script, but it is unacceptable for any operating system to force the user to write a program that will do something as simple as read data off a device. This isn't the user's job. It's no problem for me but that's because I'm an expert. The next user will not be able to read his or her files and this is a serious flaw.

    3. Re:Windows lookalike? by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

      Better use Gnome in that case...

      That is what we mean with choice on Linux.

    4. Re:Windows lookalike? by Illissius · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't see how or why you equate 'not showing a big intrusive dialog every time the user inserts a "medium"' with 'having to sudo (u)mount everything by hand'. I much prefer to just have an icon put on the desktop, which I can access at my leisure. (This, incidentally, also happens, and I turn the big intrusive dialog off.)

      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    5. Re:Windows lookalike? by tux_fairy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but sudoing and figuring out which device is mapped to your usb is not KDE's job to automate. I agree with the parent that it's just more bloat. I'm still running KDE 3.2 and can manage all my removable devices from within Konqie without ever leaving the mouse. You just need to setup udev and proper rules, then update fstab with links in /dev/ generated by udev. And your fstab entries will show up in Konqie under devices, which then you click and it auto mouts them for you. Once I've set that up for my dad who is a truck driver, he never once called me with problems on how to access his SD card, iomega zip drive or a CF card from USBAT connector that came with his MP3 player.. Bottom line is... configure from shell once, live graphical forever. This latest KDE enhancement does make it IDIOT proof, because same thing was user friendly already. Now, if KDE is capable of configuring udev automatically, as I had to do manually then I'd be impressed. But that will never happen given all the distros in the world...

    6. Re:Windows lookalike? by labratuk · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, you were already able to do this in KDE 3.4. If you were using it with the HAL/DBUS options going, hotplugged media would have automatically popped up in media:/. It just didn't have the dialog popping up.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    7. Re:Windows lookalike? by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 1

      This is what the dialog is intended to do. Just ask you what to do with it the first time, then do it that way everytime.

    8. Re:Windows lookalike? by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 1

      Listen to yourself: "You just need to setup udev...update fstab...links in /dev/...". One can do it that way too, the problem is, your trucker dad couldn't do any of that himself. No operating system should expect the user, who depends on the GUI, to do that. I know this isn't KDE's job, but if the KDE folks want to make the Linux OS into an operating system for everyone to use, they HAVE to automate procedures like this.

  32. You will comply... by bad+jerkface · · Score: 0

    with the web standards. Does your browser comply? http://www.webstandards.org/act/acid2/test.html

    --
    It's a hand twinkler, you dumbass! And I got a bag of whoopass for you!
    1. Re:You will comply... by hammackj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mine passes, but it means nothing. Most people still use Internet Explorer, and they wont change.

    2. Re:You will comply... by bad+jerkface · · Score: 0

      Most people still use Internet Explorer, and they wont change.

      That is not necessarily true. For example, I used Internet Explorer at one point in time. Now I do not.

      --
      It's a hand twinkler, you dumbass! And I got a bag of whoopass for you!
  33. "Stable?" "Stable" is for Isotopes by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really. I love Linux, have been a user since the early 90's, but some of the language conventions just vex me. "Stable" for instance. Yeah, yeah, I know what is meant by it in this context, but it never fails to make me contemplate what an "unstable" desktop would be like, and the vision has nothing to do with BSODs. "Stable" is for relationships and isotopes, and is valid only in the context that most examples in kind are given to falling apart. It's part of the "I was happy to hear you are no longer beating your wife!" phrase family that achieves a "positive" slant only by dragging the listener through scary negative spaces. Linux deserves better than this.

    It also deserves better than having its major graphics package called "The Gimp," but that's a discussion for a different day...

  34. gentoo by PePeBoTiKa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Arrggg, I've just finished the compile of KDE 3.4.3 on my gentoo system about an hour ago! And it's not a joke :-(

    1. Re:gentoo by jounihat · · Score: 1

      "Arrggg, I've just finished the compile of KDE 3.4.3 on my gentoo system about an hour ago! And it's not a joke :-("

      Well, the release schedule for KDE 3.5 has been online for months, so keep hitting your head to the wall. Maybe next time you'll remember to check the list before upgrading.

    2. Re:gentoo by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Never fear! Just kick off the compile job for 3.5 now and you'll be ready to install 3.5 when KDE 4.0 arrives!

      (Kidding, only kidding. I *heart* KDE)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  35. Doesn't KDE = Koit Damaged Experience ? by axonis · · Score: 0, Troll

    If you want some serious koit damage choose KDE for your distro ,.... no just kidding ! We love all love Mark Shuttleworth decision to support KDE in Ubuntu..

    --
    bæ8Ã0sÃOE?5r©oÂÃ?âz:ÃÃAÃ?ÃOEÂ6fXÃ?]Â
  36. Re:troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm serious. I'm not trying to rake up shit. The multiplicity of options is a waste of time and energy, and it makes compatability a pain in the ass.

    Yes your tired old argument is a troll. It's not going to happen, it simply is not the nature of the computing world, get over it and stop wasting everyones time and energy with this argument.

  37. If 3.5 is a major release... by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 4, Funny


    ...what will 4.0 be? A stupendous release? An amazing release? A "Moses came down with KDE 4.0 on some tablets" release?

    I'm not knocking them, but I thought there was an accepted custom to releases. If the number to the left of the decimal point changes it's a major release and if it doesn't it's a minor release. Kids today and their releases...I can't keep up.

    1. Re:If 3.5 is a major release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is different. 4.x is for QT 4.
      3.x is for QT3.

      KDE team does not develop QT. Therefore .Y releases are as much major as X. release in terms of KDE functionality. QT adds new possibilities, however. But that's hardly under their control is it :)

    2. Re:If 3.5 is a major release... by zootm · · Score: 1

      I'm not knocking them, but I thought there was an accepted custom to releases.

      In the grand tradition of Open Source offering choice, above all else, there are in fact several different accepted customs to releases. Just don't put the supporters of different ones into one room and you'll be fine.

    3. Re:If 3.5 is a major release... by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      If 3.5 is a major release... what will 4.0 be? A stupendous release?

      Yes.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    4. Re:If 3.5 is a major release... by TheDauthi · · Score: 3, Funny

      To put it shortly, yes, we are planning on sending Moses down with 4.0. Jesus Christ was unavailable, and while Cthulhu volunteered, we remember windows ME well enough to know that driving our users mad is a bad thing.

    5. Re:If 3.5 is a major release... by hummassa · · Score: 3, Informative

      Then KDE4 is another version, ie, a rewrite.
      Got it?
      KDE 3.3 -> KDE 3.3.1 minor release, bug fixes, small enhancements
      KDE 3.4.3 -> KDE 3.5 major release, re-engineering things, big enhancements
      KDE 3.5.4 -> KDE 4.0 new version, re-written, ported apps to new Qt version

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    6. Re:If 3.5 is a major release... by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Actually it's not a rewrite (and it would take more than a year as KDE passed the 4 million lines of code mark recently iirc).

      It's a port of KDE3 to Qt4 which breaks binary compatibility (therefore it gets a new major number). That also means that there will be major changes in the user interface etc. that would be too intrusive for 3.5 (major rearrangements of toolbars, menus, a new iconset, probably a new widget style etc) and also major changes in the backends (new libs, changed old libs, changes to dcop, plasma to replace kdesktop, kicker and superkaramba, etc.). In the end they'll probably rewrite much of the api parts but most of the programs will just change incrementally.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    7. Re:If 3.5 is a major release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > To put it shortly, yes, we are planning on sending Moses down with 4.0.

      And when he comes down and discovers people using GNOME, he will throw a hissyfit and yell and scream, then finally destroy the tablets? And then go back up and come down once again with the *exact* same crap? Yeah, sounds like KDE ...

  38. Disagree by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    KDE and GNOME have both matured to a point where they both have established "personalities" and there are good reasons for choosing one over the other. In my case, I prefer using KDE on the "family" computer while my home workstation uses GNOME. Additionally, the two desktops are getting pretty good at dealing with each others applications provided the appropriate libraries are there.

    My point is, two dominant desktops need not be a weakness provided the two desktops agree to "play nice" with each other. I would instead propose that both teams develope a single login manager that works equally well with either GNOME or KDE. Call it "IDM" since "I" is halfway between "G" and "K".

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Disagree by Paladin128 · · Score: 1

      I'll have to second this suggestion. I use KDE as my primary desktop, and generally use KDM just because it's easy to integrate and configure. But GDM, though not perfect, is a FAR better desktop manager -- much more control over look/feel, cleaner, faster, etc. The thing I like better about KDM is that the username/password are on the same screen. I haven't used GDM in a while, but I hated that at least in the past, you couldn't have a list of users to click on.

      IMHO, GDM should be taken and overhauled, and made a standard part of X.org, with a clean, easy config interface that could be edited by either KDE or GNOME. XDM blows chunks, and there's no reason that a quality display manager couldn't come standard with X. I think it would add a lot.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    2. Re:Disagree by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      How about Knome?

    3. Re:Disagree by m50d · · Score: 0

      This version of KDE will now integrate nicely with GDM. (can use it to reboot, etc.). But is it me or is it only KDE that ever seems interested in changing to interoperate?

      --
      I am trolling
    4. Re:Disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've noticed this, too. At one point I noticed the "gtk2-engines-qt" package which makes GTK widgets render using QT and thought "Hey - an olive branch from the GNOME/ GTK guys!", and then I noticed it was written by KDE hacker Zack Rusin.

      Apart from all the technical merits, I find KDE to be less politicised than GNOME and far more welcoming and pragmatic. Of course, being an OSS project, "less politicised" doesn't really mean very much! :)

  39. how to upgrade? by frankcow · · Score: 1

    If I'm running SUSE 10, what should I do to upgrade? If I just use SUSE's update tool will I get it automatically? (yes, complete linux newb here)

    1. Re:how to upgrade? by Jonny_eh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Go into YaST (Menu->Systen->YaST).

      Open Software->'Installation Source'. You want to add a yast repository that contains the KDE 3. rpms. Lucky for us SuSErs, almost every suse mirror has them!

      You can find mirrors from google if you search 'suse mirrors', and choose the 2nd result.

      The directory that you need to choose depends on the mirror, but it is usually along the lines of pub/suse/i386/supplementary/KDE/update_for_10.0.

      Make sure you choose FTP, or HTTP depending on the server. Enable refresh on the server (this makes yast check to see if the repository is updated each time it's accessed).

      Then click finish to close the 'installation source' window. Now in YaST, open 'software management'. What you want to do is display all your installed packages, so you want to filter based on the 'package groups', then choose 'zzz all packages', located at the bottom of the left side. This will show you every package that you have installed, and is available to install. Now click 'Package->All in this List->Update if Newer Version is Available'. Now all the installed packages that can be updated have been selected!

      Click 'Accept', and try an solve any conflicts that arise, usually solve each conflict one at a time and click 'OK - Try Again' each time, sometimes solving one conflict removes others.

      It'll then tell you of any extra packages that will be needed, and away you go!

    2. Re:how to upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Install apt and Kynaptic (use yast for that), with them is easier to install programs. You can do a quick search in the web: apt suse repository
      I am sure you are able to discover the rest.

      http://ernestus.no-ip.info/

    3. Re:how to upgrade? by Maqueo · · Score: 1

      Yes, KDE will be on your current packages list, and the "Update system" (or "Update software", I dont' recall right now). You'll have to have for the respository to include it (don't forget to refresh)

    4. Re:how to upgrade? by frankcow · · Score: 1

      very thorough explanation, thank you!

    5. Re:how to upgrade? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Im updating right now my SuSE 10 with apt to the new KDE. But check this list of additional yast repositories for more things to install, including updated KDE.

    6. Re:how to upgrade? by frankcow · · Score: 1

      were you able to get dvd playback in suse 10? I added an additional mirror, installed win32 codecs, couldn't find libdvdcss, found libdvdnav though do I need to uninstall the default Xine package? sorry for the off-topic question, maybe this isn't the place to ask

    7. Re:how to upgrade? by MentalMooMan · · Score: 1

      If you're on x86, then it's easy. Just follow http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/dvdplay. If you're on something like x86_64, it's a little more difficult, but I got it working after a while.

      --
      43rd Law of Computing:
      Anything that can go wr
      fortune: Segmentation violation -- Core Dumped
    8. Re:how to upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ... download trojaned binaries from novell.

      KDE -> first linux desktop
      GNOME -> spoiled the attempt for ONE desktop
      GNOME -> took tons of bloatware (pango) libraries and made the super bloat toolchain. (corba? bonobo? mono?)
      GNOME -> miguel de icaza
      NOVELL -> Got $500M from ms for "some trademark"
      NOVELL -> Funds Mono (a bunch of migule's friends)
      NOVELL -> Standarizes on GNOME a, drops KDE. SuSE founder quits with a polite explanation.

      Need more proof?

    9. Re:how to upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Open Software->'Installation Source'. You want to add a yast repository that contains the KDE 3. rpms. Lucky for us SuSErs, almost every suse mirror has them! You can find mirrors from google if you search 'suse mirrors', and choose the 2nd result. The directory that you need to choose depends on the mirror, but it is usually along the lines of pub/suse/i386/supplementary/KDE/update_for_10.0. Make sure you choose FTP, or HTTP depending on the server. Enable refresh on the server (this makes yast check to see if the repository is updated each time it's accessed) etc. etc. etc."

      Ah, the lovely world of Linux software installation, which everyone keeps bleating is 'solved' by 'apt-get' and co.

      Look at that lot above. For decades, many operating systems have facilitated double-click-and-go software installation. And Linux still has this labyrinthine mess?

      Never mind that you can rarely get new software without compiling it from source, or using some constantly-shifting mid-development 'repository'.

      Linuxers may not be able to see the wood for the trees, but it's all absurdly complicated and overabstracted for those of us used to many other OSes...

    10. Re:how to upgrade? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      You mean Windows provides thousands of free programs that install without having to download them? Really?

      Wow, I should boot up Windows more often. Maybe DOOM3 installed itself while I wasn't looking!

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    11. Re:how to upgrade? by twener · · Score: 1

      What has your "double-click-and-go software installation" to do with setting up a continuously online-updating software repository?

    12. Re:how to upgrade? by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see an easy way to install a different desktop environment in Windows. HA!

    13. Re:how to upgrade? by frankcow · · Score: 1

      This is a nice tutorial But after following every step, my DVDs now sort of play: I geta plain blue screen, and hear some of the sound track in the background

  40. Unstable bloatware. by weevlos · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This release was so bad that Debian pulled it, in its entirety, out of testing for 3 days straight. I did a dist upgrade and everything KDE went away.

    Been a KDE user for a long time, but 3.5 is half-baked and should not have been released except as an alpha.

    1. Re:Unstable bloatware. by Dionysus · · Score: 1

      Really? Because I've been tracking unstable, and the latest there is KDE 3.4. In fact, according to this messages here, it seems the KDE 3.5RC just hit experimental. There is no way a huge package like KDE went from experimental to testing without going through unstable.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    2. Re:Unstable bloatware. by andersa · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true.

      As you can readily verify by looking at the developer information for the kdelibs source package, kde 3.5 has not been uploaded into Debian yet.

      The release candidate has been on alioth since mid november. Those packages are considered highly experimental!

      On the other hand major KDE releases does seem to get shorter and shorter time between them, and I have a sneaky suspicion that they are cutting features off their roadmaps to get the release out at a certain time and not telling people about it. I can't prove that though.

      I do think KDE needs to reconsider how they do quality control, and think more about stability vs. features.

    3. Re:Unstable bloatware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that's interesting... I've been using KDE 3.5 since beta 1 and the *only* bug I've had so far has to do with file transfers in Kopete.

      So, please be specific or stop trolling.

    4. Re:Unstable bloatware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you on crack? why do you do a dist-upgrade? and no, it was NOT pulled out of debian.

  41. Yesssss!!!! by jesterpilot · · Score: 1

    This comment appeared on slashdot while i was writing this: http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169622&c id=14137500

    I wonder if i ever read an article on /. without someone touting (hidden or less hidden) one of these misconceptions about linux-for-normal-people or linux-in-the-real-world.

    --
    Trust me, I work for the government.
  42. Re:troll? by MartinG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Free software products work like species. Their environment is the users and developers and they mutate to gain favour of the users. Their "random" mutation is the development cycle, including possibly many branches and forks with cross pollenation of both ideas and code. This is just the same as evolution in real species. Without enough variation and competition, species stagnate. Closed source software is mostly the same except the oppurtunity for random mutation is massively decreased.

    Consider the web browser as an example. After Microsoft illegally crushed all the competition with IE, the browser stagnated for years while competition recovered. Once other had caught up, suddenly they start developmemt again. No cross pollenation of code because of incompatible licenses. (the offspring would be a mule) but ideas have spread. (tabbed browsing etc)

    We need multiple competing desktops. That we have two that can (to some degree at least) cross pollenate code as well as ideas is part of what puts us at a potential advantage against commercial offerings. If we had only one, no code cross pollenation could occur and in that sense we would be on a more level playing field in terms of future potential.

    --
    -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
  43. Now we just need... by squoozer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...one of the major distributions to get behind KDE and push it a bit. Debian is about the closest I can think of (yes, I know I'm going to get flamed for that) and that is desktop neutral. There's kubuntu but that could hardn't be called major (although I think it will do pretty well).

    It's a real shame because IMVVHO I think KDE is the better Desktop system. I know under the hood Gnome is supposed to be better but quite frankly as long as it works I don't really care. I want different things from my desktop than from my API. I want my desktop to be inviting and fun to use I want the APIs I use to be like my bank manager (boring and predictable). Gnome seems to have the API right but the desktop wrong and KDE has the desktop but not the API. I might be totally wrong here because I have never used the API of either (roll on (a fast) swing) but that's the impression I get from the advocates for each side.

    The other main argument against KDE is that it is too much of a Windows clone. Perhaps I'm the only one that thinks this but I think that's a good thing. I can switch quickly between windows and KDE without too much thought. Like it or not, M$ have spent millions designing an easy to use desktop system. Perhaps it's not perfect but I can't help feeling that the Gnome people are being different simply because they don't want look like windows.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    1. Re:Now we just need... by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IMHO, in it's newer released Gnome works better in the interface than KDE (I used KDE for a long time before Gnome).

      I don't know what it is, but KDE just feels "wrong" at this point. When rendering text under in icon, it often cuts it off in an odd place. Toolbars look cluttered. The default icon and widget themes (and even most of the others available) are so busy and flashy that it's often hard to discern from the picture what the function is (and in essence totally nullifying the usefullness of an icon). Things seem to lag behind the inteface when you press a button.

      Don't get me wrong, KDE is a wonderful acheivement, and over time it's implemented a lot of good features, but it just feels a bit "gimmicky" to me these days. Something thats nice to look at and say "Wow. These guys do this and give it away for free.". With Gnome things look more refined. Things are less flashy, but work better for the most part (there are still some problems like the file selection dialog). I remember back in the Gnome 1.x days some group (can't remember which one) announced that they'd be supporting Gnome as the "official" Linux desktop and I thought that it was a terrible decision (Gnome 1.x was an ugly mess), but now I think it truly is the better desktop.

      In the end though, both projects benefit each other.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:Now we just need... by gsasha · · Score: 1
      Well, FWIW, Kubuntu already has the new packages available.

      Downloading them now...

    3. Re:Now we just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I know under the hood Gnome is supposed to be better .... Gnome seems to have the API right but the desktop wrong and KDE has the desktop but not the API
      Huh? When did that happen? I thought the KDE API was supposed to be cleaner and the better integrated of the two, more easy to develop to, better plug-in architecture, better code reuse, etc, etc. That certainly used to be the case when I looked at them 2 years ago. Has Gnome has some kind of epiphany or something?
      I might be totally wrong here because I have never used the API of either
      Then why make statements like that based on just heresay.

    4. Re:Now we just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's kubuntu but that could hardn't be called major (although I think it will do pretty well).

      Are you kidding? Ubuntu is currently the top dog in Linux distros and Kubuntu is not far behind as it's basically the same thing set to a KDE theme. I usually install the Kubuntu desktop right after installing Ubuntu since there are some useful KDE apps like K3B.

      Ubuntu plus Kubuntu is basically the same thing as Debian except with a sane release schedule.

    5. Re:Now we just need... by Klivian · · Score: 5, Informative

      I know under the hood Gnome is supposed to be better

      That's rather the strangest thing I have heard all day, KDE is generally thought to be cleaner and better than Gnome under the hood. With the better underlying technology and architecture.

      Gnome seems to have the API right but the desktop wrong and KDE has the desktop but not the API.

      Seems like you have got that one backwards, the API are the one thing people usually praise with KDE. The complaints are about the "cluttered" desktop, indication that they think Gnomes is better.

      but quite frankly as long as it works I don't really care.

      Agreed, and there's the point where KDE wins out in the end. It got the applications and features making it possible to get the things you want done.

      The other main argument against KDE is that it is too much of a Windows clone.

      Anyone who have actually used KDE know it's not true, as KDE is much more. Funny thing is, set KDE up with a non-blue color scheme and those complaints dissapear.

    6. Re:Now we just need... by m50d · · Score: 1

      KDE puts a lot of emphasis on the API, and has been accused of putting too much effort into making the perfect libraries and not paying attention to the programs that use them. The API is remarkably clean and I can write a KDE application faster than with anything else I've tried if I use the python bindings, and faster than anything else in C++/C without them. KDE's API quality is superior to that of gnome, no question.

      --
      I am trolling
    7. Re:Now we just need... by ajs · · Score: 1

      Why does a KDE announcement have to be about Gnome? KDE is fine, and while I use a Gnome desktop, I often run some excellent KDE apps like K3B. The two actually have very few core differences, and the casual user usually ends up paying more attention to the default configuration differences, and never even knowing about the true divergence between them anyway.

    8. Re:Now we just need... by darkwhite · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To each their own. To me, Gnome apps look flashy (icons in standard OK/Cancel/Apply buttons? No thanks, I just need Enter/Esc to work), disjointed (try comparing the amount of shared functionality in Gnome apps and KDE apps sometime - you can expect each KDE app to implement standard toolbar/shortcut configuration dialogs and tons of other standard actions in predictable ways), uncoordinated (the default CrystalSVG KDE iconset is more coherent than anything I've seen in Gnome, and with only minor tweaking the whole environment looks very subdued and serious) and by no means faster than anything I use in KDE. The two points I agree with you on are bad toolbars (not so much cluttered as the customization tool is broken) and bugs in icon text/selection rectangle drawing.

      KDE is far more integrated than any other set of apps I've seen, and this integration is useful in many non-obvious ways. To me, in KDE things look more refined.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    9. Re:Now we just need... by Jason+Hood · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I think the opposite is true. Under the hood (Qt, ioSlaves, kParts), KDE is currently the cleanest most extendable platform available OSS desktop out. The difference is Gnome and KDE just have totally different directions. Both want to be usable but in different ways. Gnome for instance seems to be more focused on cleaner minimalistic interfaces, almost more like a WM than a DE. KDE wants to be more usable from a system standpoint, an entire integrated desktop environment that is seamless. kparts and ioslaves are truely remarkable and help developers makes quickly. Gnome on the other hand has a very fragmented framework.

      Take gthumb for instance, since gnome doesnt really support the notion of ioslaves. The ssh protocol is only partially supported. Different parts of the app can use it, others can't. Makes it very confusing and frsutrating for the wife. In KDE ioslaves do not even come into play for most applications. If you make a simple app that needs reads and writes files in gnome, you need to account for each io protocol that the desktop may use. In KDE, its a completely decoupled. As new ioslaves are implemented, applications do not even need to be recompiled.

      I am a gnome user, but do accept the fact that KDE has a far superior framework and implements very usable (and modern) design patterns. Arguably, this is partially due to the fact that KDE uses C++ and gnome uses C. OO programming opens the door to more possibilities while minimizing code replication.

      KDE needs to accept the fact, that most people hate the 1 inch bar on the bottom of a default install. I do not know a single person (~30) that do not rearrange the bars to look like a Mac. The nice thing is they can, the bad thing is, they have to. Plasma and KDE4 should change that by creating a cleaner more intuitive interface to the average user.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
    10. Re:Now we just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know under the hood Gnome is supposed to be better but quite frankly as long as it works I don't really care.

      Um, what? GNOME is supposed to be better under the hood? Who told you that? The majority of GNOME supporters I see claim that GNOME is better because of usability and licensing terms (they are both Free Software, but GNOME libs can be used by proprietary applications freely, whereas Trolltech gets proprietary companies to pay up to fund Free Software development).

      I doubt many would claim that GNOME is better under the hood, KDE's got a really nice architecture, thanks in part to the great Qt toolkit. Have you seen how fast KOffice and Konqueror start up compared with Open Office and Firefox (even after disabling preloaded Konqueror)? The difference is immense.

    11. Re:Now we just need... by Dasher42 · · Score: 1

      The other main argument against KDE is that it is too much of a Windows clone.

      I really have to wonder how many people really tried other settings besides Windows while in the KDE setup wizard. The environment is almost too darn configurable for its own good. At least the integration means that if you stick to KDE and Qt programs, your preferences carry over very consistently.

    12. Re:Now we just need... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      It's really pissing me off. I use KDE, here's an announcement, and most of the conversation involves Gnome. I don't give a pissant about Gnome, AutoCAD, CharGrill cooking methods, Yamaha motorcycles or spray cheese... these are all things I don't use.

      But I do use KDE, this announcement is about KDE, and everybody's talking about something I don't use or care about.

      It makes me want to start a discussion on why I like my Weber grill the next time there's a Gnome announcement.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    13. Re:Now we just need... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      look carefully at this:

      http://download.freshmeat.net/screenshots/27914.pn g

      thats fluxbox. KDE's default colour scheme is just that - a colour sheme (and some dont like the widget style, which is also configurable).

      You can make KDE look like a CDE ripoff (not that you'd want to)

    14. Re:Now we just need... by utlemming · · Score: 1

      I use both -- KDE on my Desktop and Gnome in my VMware virtual machines. Helps me to keep them straight. Gnome is a lot cleaner. But I really like KDE. I think that KDE is what is going to get a lot of the Windows folks over to Linux. KDE is what part of what got me off of Windows. (Don't you love how people talk about droping Windows like they talk about dropping a drug habit?) Gnome reminds me too much of a Mac. But for a virtual machine it works great.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    15. Re:Now we just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...one of the major distributions to get behind KDE and push it a bit.

      Like SUSE Linux? Or Mandriva?

    16. Re:Now we just need... by squoozer · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I was, it seems, mistaken about the API thing. Pretty sure it will never bother me though as I have very little intention of spreading my skills to include C++ anytime soon :o). Anyway, I was just going to say that I agree about the toolbar (bottom bar). By default it's to tall at 1 inch. Having said that for a very long time (years) I left it like that. I figured that with multiple desktops it didn't matter that chunk at the bottom got wasted. Recently however I have switched it to auto hide. Under windows my start bar is more like 1.5 inches simple because of the number of quick launch buttons I have but again it's auto hidden. All in all I'm not sure it's that much to complain about but I look forward to the KDE 4 LAF.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    17. Re:Now we just need... by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      You talke a lot about what you hear, but what do you think?

      It's a real shame because IMVVHO I think KDE is the better Desktop system. I know under the hood Gnome is supposed to be better but quite frankly as long as it works I don't really care.

      Who says Gnome is better, Gnome developers? People who messed around with KDE 1.x and that awful orb they used?

      Perhaps you should sit down with KDevelope and actually use it. Then you will find out for yourself. And it wont take very long either, unless you've never done any C++.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    18. Re:Now we just need... by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, set KDE up with a non-blue color scheme and those complaints dissapear.

      Wow! A light just exploded in my head! For years I've been confused by all these gnomies bitching that KDE was a Windows clone. Being in possession of two eyes capable of visually comparing the two, I always thought the complaint was rather specious.

      But now that I think about it, color does affect the subconscious rather strongly. Imagine a gray color scheme (ala NeXT) and the complaints that the desktop is too outdated. Or a lilac and pink scheme and the complaints about being too frivolous for corporate settings. I say we fire all those usability "experts" and hire a professional colorist.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    19. Re:Now we just need... by Net_Wakker · · Score: 1
      KDE needs to accept the fact, that most people hate the 1 inch bar on the bottom of a default install. I do not know a single person (~30) that do not rearrange the bars to look like a Mac.

      Well, you don't know me (that I know of anyhow), but I'm 38, use KDE exclusively on my pc's at home and on my pc and Sun workstation at work, and none of my bars look like a Mac. As for the 1 inch bar, some people I know really like it, others, like me, use autohide. Zero inch bar except when you need it.
    20. Re:Now we just need... by ajs · · Score: 1

      If you do, and I have mod points, I might just take the meta-mod hit and bump you up a notch ;)

    21. Re:Now we just need... by NeoChaosX · · Score: 1

      Has Gnome has some kind of epiphany or something?

      Yes it does, but it's just a web browser. ;)

      --
      One man's selflessness is another man's annoyance.
  44. Typical misunderstanding by TA · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You don't get it: There's no incompatibility! What desktop you use does not matter when it comes to which applications you can run. I used to run KDE, now I use FVWM and I can (of course!) run any of the KDE applications I used in the past, just as I can use any and whatever GNOME application I want. It does not matter which desktop you use.

    The point is that some desktops or window managers will be annoying to some people because of the way they choose to work (e.g. some prefer to have lots of desktops with lots of overlapping windows, next door some guy prefers not having any overlapping windows at all, these people will typically want totally different focus/click/to-front/to-back behaviour) and often this is best achieved by choosing another desktop type. But any application will work fine all the same!

    This is one of the greatest strengths of X11. Forcing everyone to use the same desktop is like forcing everybody to use the same length skis: It works somehow, but don't tell me it's good for everyone.

  45. Re:"Stable?" "Stable" is for Isotopes by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Whatever. I'll take something called 'stable' over something called 'beta' any day, which seems to be what all free services are called today. Need I slashlink? Nah, I'll just wait for the dupe.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  46. A big step up from KDE 1.x by caluml · · Score: 1

    Bleargh - anyone remember this old thing? KDE 1.x. Got a box at work with it still on there - Redhat 7? 8? and it pains me.
    But agreed on the comments about the default styles.

    1. Re:A big step up from KDE 1.x by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

      I used KDE-1.0 on Caldera OpenLinux-1.3, installed from a Linux For Dummies CD-ROM included with the book, for a couple of years -- until libc6 got stable, around RH-6.2, which shipped with KDE-1.1, IIRC. I upgraded its KDE to 1.2, then to 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2 before it broke, but nevermind, by then I had stopped using it in favor of Blackbox.

      Recently, needing glibc=>2.3 for some app, I installed SuSE-9 with KDE over RH. Then, unsatisfied, I tried a hd-install of Knoppix, but found myself using fluxbox (blackbox clone) instead of KDE-3.4.x.

      I don't hate KDE, but, as I have old hardware, it is slow. And it still clobbers the keyboard rate on the console, too, changing the delay on repeat to .5 seconds instead of my own quicker preference.

      Perhaps 4.0 will be more to my liking.

    2. Re:A big step up from KDE 1.x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Perhaps 4.0 will be more to your liking? What do we have here? A nerd woman? Wow! And I'm Conan O'Brien.

    3. Re:A big step up from KDE 1.x by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

      Oh.

      The name thing.

      Sound it out.

      Then call me a woman.

                          --AnnaMerikin.

  47. Re:troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and they look different, behave different, a pull in a stack of libraries and daemons, munching through memory like there's no tomorrow.

    Ah well, there's always www.syllable.org and www.haiku-os.org

  48. 3.5 by SpinJaunt · · Score: 0

    now, why is that precisely 3.5 days ago, I built 3.4.2 from ports? oh well, back to portupgrade for me :(

    --
    /. is good for you.
  49. You are so right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    FreeBSD host.example.com 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #4: Tue Nov 29 01:34:08 UTC 2005
            root@host.example.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
  50. Re:"Stable?" "Stable" is for Isotopes by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    I think of "stable" as a trusty stable for horses you can take for a ride.
    A horse is an OS here, and the stable is a state of security for the horses... I mean, OS.

    And an "UN-stable" is rather a horse stable controlled by the United Nations.
    So it's more for users who truly understand the implications of having a horse/OS there.

    I hope it's more clear now.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  51. Removable media, finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I remember when I first tried Linux. It was Red Hat 4 and I remember grumbling about having to type something to use my newly inserted media. Over the years there have been some solutions but none without major drawbacks.

    From the screenshots of KDE 3.5 it seems that this long-standing problem has been solved. FINALLY. It's about 10 years late but it's finally here! A viable solution for removable media!

    PS! I can't wait for the new ebuilds, so someone hurry up. ;-)

    1. Re:Removable media, finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had automounting for quite some time under gnome. The gnome-volume-manager has been in use by me since 2.8 (I think) and works great. It may have been around before that, I really don't remember, I just know that I haven't mounted a CD for a good long time.

      Is KDE really just now getting the same feature? I have never been a big KDE fan but it seems to me a desktop as advanced as KDE would have the same sort of utility.

    2. Re:Removable media, finally by Klivian · · Score: 1

      I've had automounting for quite some time under gnome. Is KDE really just now getting the same feature?

      Nope, the automounting feature has worked in KDE for a long time. And even KDE 2.0 had seamless mounting of CDs and floppy. This has really nothing to do with the mounting part, it's a tool for automating the acctions preformed after the media is inserted. Like when you insert a audio CD you get an userfriendly dialog asking you if you want to play it, rip it or do noting. And you can easily set it to do the same automatically each time width that kind of media. Or to never show anything if you prefer(aka turning the feature off).

    3. Re:Removable media, finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Like when you insert a audio CD you get an userfriendly dialog asking you if you want to play it, rip it or do noting."

      That is the most annoying feature I have EVER come across in any OS. Windows XP's clippy ported to Linux. Gnome has it as well. First thing I did was to turn it off completely in disgust! (i don't want to be forced to answer the "Do you want to..." for every single new type of media i have inserted.)
      Does anyone use it at all?

    4. Re:Removable media, finally by Klivian · · Score: 1

      That is the most annoying feature I have EVER come across

      It's basically a really powerfull and userfriendly feature, but some have to actually use it to understand that. i don't want to be forced to answer the "Do you want to..." for every single new type of media i have inserted.

      Well how many different types of media do you regularly use? Probably no more than 4 or 5, most likely even less. And you then set the dialog to repeat that everytime with each of the mediatypes, making your preferred acction automatic rather. When that's done you will not see the dialog again for that media type. It's a rather smart designed feature. It lets you as a user define an automatic acction in a userfriendly way, rather than deciding for you what to do or doing nothing. Does anyone use it at all?

      Yes, regularly with audio CD's. I either want to play it or rip it, the dialog gives me easy access to both functions. And if I insert a DVD, I have set i to automatically open my preferred player.

  52. Re:troll? by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    Guess you've learned your lesson now. You're free to say KDE blows and Gnome rocks, or vice versa, and not be labelled flamebait or troll - but never dare to suggest that linux has a standard base or you're marked troll.

    Amusingly enough, stories about the Linux Standard Base Project http://www.linuxbase.org/ are not labelled troll, though people often use their posts in those stories saying the whole thing is a waste of time, because by gum if they had to wrestle with dependencies for an hour to compile a program, you should too.

    Linux Standard Base:
    "We strive to develop and promote a set of standards that will increase compatibility among Linux distributions and enable software applications to run on any compliant system. In addition the LSB will help coordinate efforts to recruit software vendors to port and write products for Linux."

    Yeah, clearly a waste of time, or a "Windows for Linux". Sheesh.

  53. Not Anymore by everphilski · · Score: 1

    you usually have to pay for at least the IDE (say, visual studio), and they tend to be pretty expensive..

    Nope. Visual Studio Express Editions are completely free equivalents to the commercial versions of Visual Studio. They lack some features but allow people to do commercial or non-commercial development for windows.

    -everphilski-

  54. Re:"Stable?" "Stable" is for Isotopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not "The Gimp"... It is "The GIMP" as in: GNU Image Manipulation Program.

  55. Autorun? What the heck? by MemeRot · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that they've now turned on a Windows style autorun? Why?

    "KDE has made an exciting breakthrough in its support for removable devices. On detection of specific media types KDE presents the user with a list of optional actions. These actions are configurable in KDE's control center and can be disabled entirely. This goes a great deal of the way toward fixing an old complaint, that managing removable media is too difficult in Linux, by exposing existing features in KDE and Linux to the user in an obvious fashion."
    [pic of windows style autorun window here, offering to let you play the cd, rip it, open in a new window, and my favorite, do nothing]

    1. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not really autorun. Autorun is the (mis)feature that Windows has where it examines newly inserted media for an autorun.inf file in the root directory and runs whatever program is specified without user interaction.

    2. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I quite like this feature and it will be very, very handy for newcomers to Linux who want to be able to have a DVD automatically start playing upon insertion. If you don't like it, I imagine it can be turned off easily and permanently. I do object to them painting it as some revolutionary OMG-so-innovative feature, considering how trite it is (and how long it's been available in other operating systems) - it smacks of MS-style PHB-targetted marketing, to me. Free Software should hold itself to a higher standard and only crow about its truly innovative features - if then.

    3. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Because people who don't know how to configure their desktop probably want it. If you don't want it, you're probably advanced enough to be able to turn it off.

      --
      I am trolling
    4. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get excited. The screenshot shows you can choose BOTH 'Do nothing' AND 'Don't Ask Me Again Ever'. They DID put some thought into it; it's more of a prompt than an autorun. I already know what my choices will be upon installation.

    5. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by MemeRot · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Ripping off MS is not 'innovative'.

    6. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by Proteus · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are confusing AutoRun and Media Insert Notification (MiN). MiN simply detects that removable media has been inserted and notifies the MiN manager (in this case, the KDE window manager). The individual MiN manager then has a choice about how to react. In general, this is a pretty good idea because it lets the user choose what to do, or do nothing. Advanced users can configure most MiN managers to just ignore notices, so everyone wins. No malicious code is executed unless you choose to instruct your system to do something stupid with the notification (like automatically execute the first EXE it finds or some crap).

      AutoRun is MS's addition to MiN. Windows' MiN manager will pop up a choice for certain media types (which is OK), but if AutoRun is on and the removable media contains an AUTORUN.INF file in its toplevel directy, Windows blithely executes the instructions therein. That's how the Sony BMG rootkit propagated.

      As to the implication that it's not a particularly novel feature, I have to agree: MiN has been in most modern OSes for some time. It is, however, a commonly-requested feature, and I think KDE has done well to include it in a way that satisfies their customers[1] and is still admin- and security-professional friendly.

      [1]: they are customers, even if they aren't paying.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    7. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by Proteus · · Score: 1

      To be fair, they didn't claim an innovation. They said it was a breakthrough in their interface. In otherwords, they have finally figured out how to do this in a manageable way under Linux. Not the best choice of words, but not an inaccurate thing to say. Think of 'a breakthrough' as lexically scoped. ;-)

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    8. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by Arandir · · Score: 1

      This is not a ripoff of Microsoft anymore than the Mac OSX auto run feature is a ripoff. Sigh. If this were truly a ripoff, then the option to disable it would not exist, forcing you to edit an undocumented registry key or download a separate piece of software.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    9. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      AutoRun is MS's addition to MiN. Windows' MiN manager will pop up a choice for certain media types (which is OK),

      No, it's one of the most annoying things possible because if you have a device with mixed content, it will REFUSE to set a default. It's so completely and utterly annoying when I want to just get rid of that dialog (as in forever) and just browse the disc.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    10. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by Stauf · · Score: 1

      [1]: they are customers, even if they aren't paying.

      Are you sure?

      Users, definitely, but a customer is, by most definitions 'One that buys goods or services'.

    11. Re:Autorun? What the heck? by Proteus · · Score: 1

      I want to just get rid of that dialog (as in forever)

      So, turn it off... Windows and KDE both allow you to do that, you know.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  56. Good point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And exactly WHY has Firefox been released if it can't pass the Acid2 test?

    1. Re:Good point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the Acid2 test is totally and completely worthless in pretty much every conceivable way? I can't even begin to imagine how it's managed to obtain so much currency - seriously, passing the Acid2 test doesn't make a browser better in any way shape or form, except that it now passes the Acid2 test!

    2. Re:Good point! by PsychoBrat · · Score: 1

      Acid2 is designed specifically to determine whether several of the trickier layout requirements of a CSS2 compliant browser are met, not just whether it can render a pretty picture. So yes, it is one of the most relevant tests around. Oh, 'AC'; now I understand. :)

      --
      Invisible to moderators.
  57. Re:Something Kool for my Komputer! by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

    i for one wish it came with kmacs or kim rather than kate... ;)

    --
    I don't feel like it...
  58. Re:"Stable?" "Stable" is for Isotopes by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is not "The Gimp"... It is "The GIMP" as in: GNU Image Manipulation Program.

    Oh, hey, thanks for pointing that out, Bunky. A couple more correspondence courses and I predict an absolutely stellar career in Marketing is yours for the taking.

  59. bloat by elbenito69 · · Score: 1

    Yay, new version! bloat += .1;

  60. Who's not pushing KDE? by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    Slackware's been a staunch supporter of the project since day one. Back in the Slackware 3.x and 4.x days, KDE 1.x was available, and I used it. It sure beat bare X11 with a window manager.

    Slackware's maintainers made the decision to include Gnome, and I used that for a while, too (especially as the KDE 2.x was slower and more memory intensive). It had neat advanced features, but wasn't as stable as KDE.

    Finally, as the KDE 3 branch has matured, I've been using it. Slackware packages keep being available, as Pat is a bg supporter, and I can keep on the bleeding edge via Swaret. After the way Gnome 2.x turned out, reversing over a decade of button ordering for me, I'm glad that Pat also made the decision to dump Gnome from the past couple of versions of Slackware. How is that not pushing KDE?

    The fallout from the GTK+ button reordering is still something I have to put up with, though, since things like FireFox on Win32 systems have the wrong button ordering now! Good thing I use KDE on the desktop and MacOSX on my laptop :)

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  61. Fitts Law and the Dual Layer Task Bar by Peteresch · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Fitts's Law: The time to acquire a target is a function of the distance to and size of the target.

    Placing task bar items along the edge of the screen provides the benefit of "infinite height". With the stacked display of items on the KDE task bar the top row of items do not benefit from this.

    Why have many Linux Desktop Environments chosen to implement the dual layer task bar?

    Now I understand that by providing more rows the width of the items can be greater than if they were all forced onto a single row. While the size of the target benefits from the greater width does it outweigh the benefits of the infiite height?

    1. Re:Fitts Law and the Dual Layer Task Bar by gowen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Placing task bar items along the edge of the screen provides the benefit of "infinite height". With the stacked display of items on the KDE task bar the top row of items do not benefit from this.
      Except now I've got to move the mouse back to the point where I was previously. Which is now a long way and a small target.

      So given that short trips are easy, and big targets are easy, Fitt's Law tells me that the round trip for my mouse can either be
      i) A long way to a big target (moderately easy) + a long way to a small target (hard).
      or
      ii) A short way to a small target (moderately easy) and a short way to a small target (moderately easy).

      And yet, Apple weenies would have us believe that (i) is preferable to (ii)!
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Fitts Law and the Dual Layer Task Bar by syncomm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fitt's "Laws" (*grumble*) have seemed to cause more in the way of a lack of innovation and customability than any notifiable improvements from my end. For me personally, this really struck a cord with the Amiga-style "spatial file management" and other "improvements" that have happened in Gnome. I hope KDE stays as far away from Fitt as possible and comes up with something new and unique.

    3. Re:Fitts Law and the Dual Layer Task Bar by Peteresch · · Score: 1

      So would you prefer something more akin to Apple's Expose task switcher?

    4. Re:Fitts Law and the Dual Layer Task Bar by Peteresch · · Score: 1
      Except now I've got to move the mouse back to the point where I was previously. Which is now a long way and a small target.
      But if you switched between apps the original position of the mouse is no longer relevant. It is a clean slate. Also, the shorter distance only applies to the top row of tasks and even that is neglegible. Don't get me wrong, I agree that (ii) is preferable but I don't see how it applies in this case.
    5. Re:Fitts Law and the Dual Layer Task Bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! we /would/ like expose! it's the best idea OS/X has, and it's damn useful ;)

      -A gnome user

  62. I can't be the only one to switch day to day :) by timothy · · Score: 1

    Gnome: Awesome!
    KDE: Wonderful!
    Fluxbox / Openbox / Waimea / Blackbox (in random order): Sweet!
    Enlightenment: Neat!
    WindowMaker: Fun!

    It's like the Seldon plan with more than 2 Foundations. I'm using Windows right now (schoolday; lecture in progress) and though I get to use lots of nice open-source apps, it's not as fun (in my own twisted perception; your fun-house mirror may vary) as any of the desktops on my Linux machines at home ...

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  63. "Award winning"? Which awards exactly? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    The "Best Linux Desktop" award? Boy , thats a real tough competition when
    you're up against all of one other competitor!

    1. Re:"Award winning"? Which awards exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wouldn't be at all surprised if GNOME has been awarded one too, from a different (or heck - possibly, the same!) body.

      All have won, and all must have prizes!

    2. Re:"Award winning"? Which awards exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Boy , thats a real tough competition when you're up against all of one other competitor!
      tell that to AMD
  64. Re:Something Kool for my Komputer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    That kind of stupid reply was funny when I first read one like it about, oooooo, 3-4 years ago. You must be about the 1000th poster since then to think he's being funny by doing that .... but really, its BORING !!

  65. Jesus... by lewp · · Score: 1

    Man, I've been a GNOME user for years, but KDE is getting pretty fucking cool. Rock on, KDE :).

    --
    Game... blouses.
  66. KOffice in the real world by QuaintRealist · · Score: 1

    I have been using KOffice for the last couple of years for word processing at work (machines there are just too slow for Openoffice). As a wp, KOffice is ready for prime time. The spreadsheet app, unfortunately, lags pretty far behind even openoffice in terms of features. I'ts good enough for simple tasks though.

    I have to admit, I've never found it to be buggy. Of course, I guess it depends on what version you got with your distro. The only complaint I had was that the docs aren't exactly written with your average office "joe" in mind.

    --
    Using plain ol' text since 1968
  67. If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by Austin+Milbarge · · Score: 1

    In my opinion, Linux needs to adopt a single desktop. Why the need for so many incompatible systems like KDE, gnome, Enlightenment, fvwm, etc? Each with their own libraries and configuration tools. I don't get it. No wonder simple windowing concepts like drag-and-drop and copy-and-paste are still so difficult to use in X. Pick one GUI. Pick one library. Then stick with it and make it better! Even Apple, which uses an open-source BSD unix at it's core, only recognizes one desktop. Sure, one could argue that there are many web servers, database servers, FTP servers and other overlapping applications in Linux to choose from, but I feel the GUI is the one component in an operating system that ties all the other software together. It's high time the "Tower of Babble" for desktop environments in open-source land be knocked down.

    1. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      The trouble with your idea is that different people have different ideas about what constitutes better. Gnome think their system is better whilst KDE, Enlightenment etc think there's are better.

      The great thing is they are probably all right once you realise they are motivated by different goals. What this means for the rest of us is that rather than having only one system to choose from doing things in only one way we can choose one which does things the way we think is mostly better for us.

    2. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 1

      No, this is anti-thetical to the linux mentality. You want a distribution that dedicates it's support to a single desktop. If that's what you want, problem solved -> Redhat=Gnome, Suse=KDE, and others.

    3. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sigh... The problem with your reasoning is that you see "Linux" as one big project and a single community. That's not true at all. Hell, Linux is not even an operating system, it's just a fucking kernel, and all those projects you mention aren't part of Linux at all, it's just the most popular platform to run them on.

      Projects like KDE and Gnome have different communities, and different developers and sponsors with different goals and ideas. You can't just "pick one". That doesn't make any sense.

    4. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Firefox is such a great browser why is there Opera, Konqueror, IE?

    5. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by srobert · · Score: 1

      "Why the need for so many incompatible systems like KDE, gnome, Enlightenment, fvwm, etc?"

        Copy and Paste, Highlight and press the middle mouse button, works in all X, KDE, gnome, etc. I've never had problems running apps such as gnucash, koffice, or kmail while running either or neither desktop system. I don't see why you say these systems are so incompatible. Choice and friendly competition between systems drives the improvements. Choice is good.

    6. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by mw13068 · · Score: 1

      Is it also your opinion that people should drive one type of car, eat one type of ice cream, and carpenters should all use hammers exclusively?

      Competition drives innovation. What about this notion of picking the right tool for the job? I prefer KDE personally, but I recommend GNOME for many of my clients. Why? Because GNOME does some things better than KDE, and vice versa. I am glad that I have a choice of 15 (or more) popular X window managers. That means I can pick the software that will best suit the needs of my clients.

      Why do people want "linux" to be "popular" in exchange for being free, versatile, and enjoyable? Isn't there an exceedingly popular operating system or two for these people?

      I just don't get it. Are software developers out there bleeding from the ears because it's so damned difficult to write programs for GNU/Linux? How come some people can create useful and freedom-respecting programs and others can't (and instead spend their time complaining)?

      Ok, so this is a troll, but I was provoked!

    7. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      I don't see incompatibility at all in these instances. There is nothing preventing one from running GTK or QT apps in Enlightenment. There is nothing preventing one from running GNOME apps in KDE and vice-versa, etc, etc....

      If you want everything tied together nicely use a Desktop Environment (KDE, GNOME, XFCE) rather than just a Window Manager. Again, regardless of what Window Manager or Desktop Environment you use, you can run any most any X applications with the right libraries installed.

      I don't see what the problem is. Linux is about choice and I like that. Do you want a distro that focuses mainly on just one environment? There are plenty out there to choose from that do just that.

      I run KDE, GNOME, XFCE, Enlightenment and Fluxbox on Ubuntu 5.10 and I have no trouble running any of my installed applications, regardless of what Window Manager/Desktop Environment I'm using.

      The exception of course, is when an app is buggy and won't run, period.

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
    8. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by Arandir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called "freedom". You can't coerce everyone into a single desktop without destroying freedom. I realize that this is a politically incorrect idea, but since when has reality been politically correct?

      All you people desiring authoritarian conformity should stick with Windows. You'll be happier.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    9. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      In the legend humans all spoke one language until the tower of Babel was destroyed. So I think you want to build a desktop tower-of-Babel rather than destroy one...

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    10. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion, Linux needs to adopt a single desktop.

      If you rephrase this as "Linux needs half of its users and developers to admit they've been using and contributing to the wrong project for the past 10 years", you'll see how dumb this idea is.

      And it was clever of you to say -- in a passive voice -- that Linux needs one desktop, but not which one should die (for that would surely make you a -1,Troll). Linux needs this! ... but somebody else needs to figure it out for me. I wonder what would happen if everybody thought this way? Maybe we'd have more than one desktop for Linux.

      Come on, then. Out with it! Which project shall we kill, because you don't like competition? I'll hack the DNS servers to redirect gnome.org to kde.org, or vice versa, as soon as you let me know which one deserves to die.

    11. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by Makarakalax · · Score: 1

      You're comment makes me sad. Sad there are so many fucking morons who write this comment again and again and again. Get a fucking clue, because you don't have one at all.

    12. Re:If KDE is so advanced, why gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How come some people can create useful and freedom-respecting programs and others can't

      Ummm... Why is it that most GNU programs are pretty useless and can only be used by people with pocket protectors? And thats if they work at all! Could it be the development tools are not up to snuff and force the developer to deal with them rather than worry about writing a "GOOD" program?

  68. Uh, 3 good browsers by simetra · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Opera Web Browser.

    Now, it's free without the ad banner. It's been a good Linux web browser for quite a while.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Uh, 3 good browsers by Zach978 · · Score: 1

      Why can't anyone come up with mouse gestures that can compete with Opera? I've tried the mouse gesture plugins for Mozilla/Firefox and Konq but always am unimpressed. The tolerences and the ammount of movement required just don't seem as natural as the Opera gestures. The Opera ones can be quick and small, not 300 px and then exactly 90 degrees and 300 px more.

      Maybe they've gotten better lately...

      --

      "I told you a million times not to exaggerate!"
    2. Re:Uh, 3 good browsers by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1

      I will agree that (the last time I tried it) the Firefox mouse gestures were a little rigid, but this was in constrast to the Konqueror mouse gestures, which I find are fantastic. I've never tried the mouse gestures in Opera, but I'm definitely a big fan of them in Konqueror. Just playing around right now, I can have tiny (like 10px) gestures, screen encompassing gestures, slow, fast, sloppy, precise gestures, they all work like expected. In actual use, the number of times I've had to repeat a gesture is very minimal. Really, I don't see how you could complain about Konqueror's mouse gestures.

  69. You forgot Poland! by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

    You forgot Poland! ...er...GNUStep.
    Sure it may not have all the apps, but, for developers, it's the closest thing to writing for a mac with out acutally writing for a mac.

    http://www.gnustep.org

    Also you forgot, CDE, XFCE, and Enlightenment.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:You forgot Poland! by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      I think he forgot XFCE too...

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  70. Re:troll? by m50d · · Score: 1

    LSB is a waste of time because it standardises on the wrong things. It's not sensible to use as a standard for linux. I agree that such a standard is a good thing, but the way the LSB project approaches it is entirely wrong. The mission is good but the implementation is well off.

    --
    I am trolling
  71. a-warts whinning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What is it that EVERY FUCKING product on Earth that is advertised on American media is Award-Winning?

    Meaningless and Annoying.

  72. Repeat after me: That is not autorun. by Daedala · · Score: 4, Informative

    That is not autorun. K? Got it? Try again.

    The problem with Windows autorun is that it automatically ran untrusted code from the CD you just put in. This appears to let you automatically do something using the trusted code on your own computer. That's what OS X does, and it's fine.

    There is a BIG difference between opening the CD ripping app on your computer, and opening some random app on the CD itself. If the CD ripping app on your computer is a Trojan, it's on your computer and you're already rooted. This is no more dangerous than a script you write yourself to call applications on your own computer.

    If KDE allows the CD maker to point to a random file on the CD and say "Run me!" then they deserve all the scorn one can pour upon them. But if the computer just says, "Hmm, I see a bunch of audio files! I will open my trusted audio application!" then it's a timesaver and not a major risk. (Ok, there might be some exploitable overflows in the code that does this, but that can happen anywhere.)

    --
    What I say does not represent the views of my employers, my friends, my cats, or myself.
  73. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent -1 Offtopic? I'd think parent was an Award-Winning post.

    Thank you all.

  74. Adblocking is nothing new... by big_groo · · Score: 1

    From http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kdebase/faq/web browser.html :

    9.12.

    Can Konqueror use user-specified stylesheets, like those in the Firefox adblock extention?

    Yes, you can set Konqueror to use any kind of valid css stylesheet to filter webcontent or improve accessibility. From the Konqueror main window simply click Settings->Configure Konqueror... and select Stylesheets. Set the radio button to Use user-defined stylesheet and browse to where the stylesheet you want to use is located. Alternatively, you can select Use accessibility stylesheet defined in "Customize" tab and then set your own options.

    An example of css rules that implement ad blocking can be found at: http://www.mozilla.org/support/firefox/adblock.

    Revision 3.4 (2005-01-19)

    1. Re:Adblocking is nothing new... by Arandir · · Score: 1



      That's way too difficult! KDE will never be accepted by the unwashed ignorant masses until it gets rid of its horribly convoluted interface. Instead of that nasty sequence of steps to use a custom stylesheet, what is needed is a single button that says "Use my custom stylesheet (and read my mind to figure out where I've hidden it)". Of course, since we've gotten rid of the menu bar, limited the toolbar to three icons, and started executing developers who use context menus, there's no room for this button. Therefore logic dictates that the custom stylesheets must always be the default.

      </sarcasm>

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    2. Re:Adblocking is nothing new... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      That's not adblock(the extension) compatibile. Lots of false positives, no easy way of adding more rules, no site-based blocking, and above all, the format is different than adblock filterset (wildcards, regexp matching etc). Plus it doesn't stop the ads from loading, just from displaying.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  75. Learn to upgrade properly by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    Debian never pulled it, instead, you goofed in using dist-upgrade without using your head. Just recently in testing a lot of KDE was being held back because it was waiting on the new QT compiled with the new C++ ABI. So when that new QT finally got released, a few programs were marked as upgradeable, and a whole slew of them were marked for deletion (because the most recent versions were still compiled with the old QT). At this point, a sensible admin would have realized that until the other packages catch up, they should switch to regular upgrade and give dist-upgrade a miss. But no, you, the dunce, wiped half your KDE, and now you're blaming it on a buggy release. PEBKAC. Learn to use the tools before you come crying that you smashed your thumb.

  76. YAHOO!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YAHOO!!!!!!!
    - vlad blanton

  77. I knew something was missing! by gov_coder · · Score: 2, Funny

    With the 3.5 release KDE has added "KitchenSync". The original specs for this are highly technical. You may need to watch many hours of HGTV before attempting to use this application. At last, KDE is Komplete!

    --
    Rob Enderle's excellent new book: Everything I needed to know about Computer Science I learned in Marketing School
    1. Re:I knew something was missing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not new to 3.5. I don't remember exactly when they added it, but it's in at least 3.4 and maybe 3.3. It is a rather complicated app that (in theory; I've never quite gotten it to work) should allow a user to synchronize most PIM data across two machines (and/or desktop and handheld).

  78. About button ordering... by arthas · · Score: 1

    One thing that should be noted though: Gtk+ and OSX actually have very similar button ordering...

  79. Re:What I didn't see - Hey looser aesiamun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey looser, before you flap your gums - hoplite had a good point. Why does KDE chase the fricken windows look. I for 2 think they are beyond that. Why don't you just use Windoze if you love it so much.

  80. Re:"Stable?" "Stable" is for Isotopes by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
    Stable is the release for people to use. Unstable is often non-working or uncompilable as it is in the middle of being rewritten for the next stable release. Unstable releases are for developers, stable releases are for users. Beta and RC releases are for users willing to accept potential problems in exchange for new features.

    It has nothing to do with Linux, it has to do with how software is developed. All software companies do the same thing, it's just that most closed source companies don't release their unstable versions to the public... the concept of doing so is part of how open source works.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  81. Keep thinking it ... by hummassa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and that's why a lot of stuff renders better in KHTML than in Moz.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  82. Killer feature?? by aussiedood · · Score: 2, Funny

    In this house it could well be webcam support for yahoo and msn one of the few things that has been preventing me from moving the remaining windows box over to linux. The Mrs. would kill me if she couldn't use her webcam.

    1. Re:Killer feature?? by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      I find webcam support nice, but not important. However, what this does now is move me from Gaim to Kopete regardless of what Linux Desktop Environment I'm using. Gaim has plans for Webcam support as well in version 2. But it's not here yet and I've always found Kopete's interface more appealing then that of Gaim.

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
    2. Re:Killer feature?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Mrs. would kill me if she couldn't use her webcam.

      We'd kill you too if you stopped the Mrs. from showing her b00bies on her webcam.

    3. Re:Killer feature?? by PurifyYourMind · · Score: 1

      Umm, you DO know what the "Mrs." is using the webcam for, right?

  83. KDM IPV6 Support? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    This was missing in earlier 3.x versions... Is IPV6 now supported for KDM?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  84. Re:Learn to upgrade properly [OT] by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

    Back in oh... I believe grade 11, I was taking every computer course I could. One of them was practically remedial: the Internet course! As part of the course we learned HTML and JavaScript... but we also had to learn about emoticons (and memorise at least 20), write essays on netiquette, and "get down" with all the "hip" "net lingo". It was all pretty cheesy shit and outdated even back then (seriously, who needs to know about Gopher and Archie?). I remember seeing some of the acronyms thinkg that they were pretty cute/cool but that no one would ever use them. PEBKAC (Probably Error is Between Keyboard And Chair) was definitely one of them. SISO (Shit in, Shit out) was another. So, I just gotta say thanks.

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  85. Re:What I didn't see - Hey looser aesiamun... by John+Jamieson · · Score: 1

    I think the windows style default allows the newbies to work, and grow accostomed to KDE. The Power Users will of course have no problems changing things.
    Seems like sound logic to me.

  86. KDE v Gnome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is up with the desktop envoronment rivalries? Just use what you like and be quiet about it.

  87. Re:troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention that LSB's solution to conflicting requirements is simply to throw everything into the pot and label is "standard" in the hope that it will magically solve the problem without anyone noticing.

  88. Real changelog? by martin_b1sh0p · · Score: 1

    I've been using KDE 3.5 RC1 for a while and I like it. Haven't had any issues so far. So question is, where can I find a real changelog (not the "todo", "in progress", "done" feature chart thingy) for KDE 3.5? I don't really want to "konstruct" KDE 3.5 for another 3 days to get the released version if nothing major changed between RC1 and released.

    1. Re:Real changelog? by twener · · Score: 1

      You could do a SVN diff for 3.5 tag from 3.5 RC1 revision to its Final revision.

    2. Re:Real changelog? by martin_b1sh0p · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be such a newb, but how would I do that? Looking at the SVN doc on kde.org it looks like I can do things like svn diff BASE and HEAD etc etc, but how do I say "diff between 3.5RC1 and 3.5"? And if the answer is I have to do it as a comparison between what I have locally and what's on the svn server will that work since I used konstruct and the files are under konstruct "work" folders that probably don't match / line up with what folders are on the svn server? Thanks.

  89. KDE Vs. GNOME by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

    Since this has predictably turned into a KDE vs. GNOME discussion, I'd like to point out something. I'm sure I can't be alone in this either.:

    I like an use both. Both have their advantages and disadvantages. Both excel at certain things that the other does not.

    That's exactly why I like and use both.

    That's OK isn't it? ;-)

    --
    Scott

    ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  90. Memory by tacocat · · Score: 1

    My only question is, "how much memory does it consume?". Last I tried KDE it was swapping out my PC at 512MB. Simply unacceptable.

    1. Re:Memory by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      I havn't touched my swap file since KDE 3.2 ... That's on 512MB with Gentoo, SuSE, Debian (sarge and sid), Kubuntu, and probably a few other distros I don't remember. I'd say that if there's something abusing your swap, it's not KDE. Check what daemons you are running. If there's nothing odd there, then switch distros, or compile KDE on your own.

      Please note that the memory usage reported by ps and top cannot be trusted 100%. Each app in KDE looks like it consumes huge amounts of memory, but alot of that is actually shared between processes.

      Slightly OT anecdote: I had a friend who ran FC4 & kept complaining that KDE was consuming all of his system resources. I bet him a hamburger that his problem wasn't KDE. Long story short: I got my burger, he got his cake, and we're both eating too. (Moral: Fedora Core's KDE binarys traditionally suck). YMMV.

    2. Re:Memory by tacocat · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I played with the Debian 3.3 version and it's much better. Might actually be useful if I could remember the advantages of a Desktop Environment over a Windows Manager.

      I've been using WindowMaker for a number of years now and while KDE is much better than it has been, I'm not familiar enough with it to see what advantages it would have over WindowMaker and how I use a computer today.

  91. Question for KDE people by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    All I want to know is: was a lot of work done on KDE's kompmgr? Can I finally get the shadows and real transparencies that OSX users take for granted on my ATI 9200 card without crashing? Or my Nvidia card?

    Xorg 7 is almost here. With Xorg 7 comes EXA. With EXA comes a way to have stable, accerated eye candy. KDE 3.4 was ahead of its time for putting a compsite manager in Kwin, but it was so buggy that I had to stick to my old Xcompmgr+ Gnome/Metacity combination because I could turn off the composite for times when I need a stable desktop with the click of an icon with my old setup(I need stability for a few things). I plan to switch to whatever DE has a stable composite manager first.

    Luminocity seems to be at least a year off, XFCE's composite manager is the most buggy I have dealt with, so all my hope is in KDE.

    Does 3.5 have what I want? Or am I yet again left to wait a year for KDE 4 to come out? Will I be liberated from "the toy" Xcompmgr? Can I have a stable and modern Linux desktop before 2005 ends? Or do I wait another year (well.....I won't wait another year....if its like this in mid 2006 an Intel Macmini will sit on my desktop)?

    1. Re:Question for KDE people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > With EXA comes a way to have stable, accerated eye candy. KDE 3.4 was ahead of its time for putting a compsite manager in Kwin

      Why do you think that with EXA there will be no need for a composite manager anymore!?

    2. Re:Question for KDE people by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1
      Why do you think that with EXA there will be no need for a composite manager anymore!?

      I don't. I think now that I have EXA I want a stable compositor to use it with.

    3. Re:Question for KDE people by zander · · Score: 1

      I feel its a nice expectation you have, KDE devs tend to be fast, but not that fast.
      KDE can not use features in an X.org version that has not been finalized at the time of the KDE release. There are some really cool things being done for the next KDE releases, though. I could almost say 'hold your breath' ;-)
      But that would be unhealthy.

  92. Re:gentoo (I feel your pain) by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 1

    # uname -r && ls -l `which kde-config` 2.6.14-gentoo-r3 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24101 Nov 27 10:28 /usr/kde/3.4/bin/kde-config

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
  93. For the thousandth time: Qt is GPL by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

    The Qt library is released under the GNU GPL. Free software. It was not always the case, so that's where the old controversies come from. But Qt 3 is most definitely free software.

  94. KDE apps +1 KDE desktop -1 by Hosiah · · Score: 1
    Loyal Fluxbox user for life, here, just pointing out that any KDE program will run on the Fluxbox desktop if summoned by name or added to Flux's menu. (the same holds true for other window managers from Window Maker to TWM, of course)

    I've been love/hate over KDE so long that I'm full-blown schitzophrenic now. The KDE environment may be pretty and featureful, but it manages to bring even my best hardware to it's knees. And it just bloats up with every new release. But no matter what window manager I have going, I still find Konqueror darned useful (mostly for local file browsing/managing - Firefox has my websurfing locked in!), and I manage to pick 'n' use KDE apps no matter what desktop I'm in. The rest of the family uses KDE exclusively. The kids love the games (I have grade school children, so how can I help but applaud the edutainment section?). But power-users such as myself need something as light as possible that gets out of our way.

    My only beef is when a live CD distro manages to (a) louse up the KDE configuration so it's buggy and crashes, and (b) provide no means of accessing the alternative desktops that are included on the disk anyway! I mean, c'mon, a live CD has a performance hit in the first place - wouldn't a superlight desktop alternative make sense, here?

    Of course, I should reserve judgement until I've tried the new KDE - which doubtless I'll encounter the next time I burn a distro...

  95. HAHAHA by stexbot · · Score: 1

    that doesn't make it not funny. :)

  96. KDE lures Windows users by alienmole · · Score: 1

    I keep my KDE with the Windows style to tempt all the other Windows users in the office. They look at it and go "That's Linux?" and I say "yup!" If they're interested, I hand them a Knoppix CD. If I continue converting people at my current rate, the whole world will be running Linux by... hmm, well it could take a while.

  97. Recompiling is a placebo by alienmole · · Score: 1

    Just install debian, do apt-get install kde, and be done with it.