Slashdot Mirror


Skype Offering SkypeOut Service for Free

Skudd writes "In an effort to boost new customer acquisition, Skype has begun offering its 'SkypeOut' service for free. The free service is slated to last until December 31, 2006." From the article: "While the SkypeOut service will allow free calling to regular phones, the company will continue to charge people to get calls using a service it calls SkypeIn, which costs about $38 for an unlimited 12-month subscription. Consumers can get the service for three months for about $12.80."

331 comments

  1. RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1

    Just tried it, works great!

    Rogers Customers should drop the Rogers HomePhone service. This is FREE!!!

    1. Re:RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by BRUTICUS · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check this site out for other gripes concerning rogers.
      Telecom service companies need to go down. Communication companies should be charging what the service is WORTH.

      http://www.ihaterogers.ca/

    2. Re:RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by vux984 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It should be no surprise that different VOIP providers offer different levels of support, service and infrastructure.

      I don't know about rogers per se, but if Roger's voip is anything like what its counterpart Shaw is offering, it deserves to be more expensive, its run on a dedicated network, separate from their broadband internet service -- meaning it doesn't rely on your internet being up!

      This dedicated network is also independantly powered and with backup, right down to including a battery backup for your voip modem, meaning you can even make or receive a call during a power outage! Its really almost at the same level as POTS, and light years beyond what other voip providers can even theoretically provide in terms of infrastructure and reliability.

      Of course you *do* pay a premium for it but it really is competing with POTS from the local telecom on a completely separate level from what you'd see from a Skype or Vonage. Its not for everyone, some of us don't need that level of infrastructure, fault tolerance, or reliability. Some of us do.

    3. Re:RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know someone who had their Bell phone line CUT by a Rogers serviceman who probably thought the other line wasn't in use.

    4. Re:RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      only for united states and canada, as noted by many comments below.
      could someone include that into the headline please ?

      the european telecom leaders started to get heart-attacks 5 seconds ago ...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    5. Re:RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      For us Americans living in Europe..

      how hard would it be to set up some kind of skype proxy stateside so I can take advantage of the free US to US calls?

    6. Re:RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by wickedsun · · Score: 1

      Actually, before saying stuff like that, inform yourself at least. For the past 6 months, in France, it has been free for me to call to Canada and the US with my normal phone. Since I'm canadian, this helped a lot. This comes with my internet services at a mere 17mbits (24 max, but im too far from the DSLAM) and TV for 30 euro a month (38 USD).

      Now, who's having a heart attack again?

      Oh yeah, and it has been free to call landline phones in France for a while now..

    7. Re:RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Just wait. They will start screwing with it just like Comcast does.

      I have huge VoIP problems because of the shenanagans that Comcast pulls on VoIP traffic. They recently set the cablemodems to hold onto data a bit longer making all VoIP traffic highly sensitive to bandwidth to the point that even web surfing can blow up your VoIP call quality. Even point to point SIP calls are getting hammered because of their tactics to make their Voip Service which is horribly overpriced look better than everyone else.

      Rogers will get the idea to do this as well, just wait.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by msh104 · · Score: 1

      If you can get a server there, all that is left will be to do some port forwarding.. :p

    9. Re:RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Comcast and have been using Sunrocket for months without a single problem. I also game online and have not had any problems with your "data holding" theory. Maybe that is on certain regions? I'm in northern VA.

    10. Re:RogersCustomers, forget Rogers Home Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in the upper midwest and when I was an employee of Comcast 3 months ago they made a change to the 3 headends I knew of that sent an update to the cablemodems to perform some "packet shaping" that specifically screwed with VoIP. The forums for Vonnage also has a large number of people that also noticed the change that also makes Vonnage service break up easily.

      I cant say who I am as they will hunt me down for releasing company "secrets" but it is in the plan to reduce the quality of all VoIP packets that are on normal SIP and VoIP ports to make "comcast voice" look like a better product.

      Just wait, you are more than likely in a little market still running on the outdated cisco gear. The new motorola systems will give them the ability to do the shaping and screwing with services they want. (P2P will be dead as they are desperate to kill bittorrent)

      Search google for Comcast VOIP problems and read ofr a few days to get more information.

      Lumpy is feeling the same thing if he is in any of the top 20 markets or anywhere serviced by the "CRAN"

  2. And yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Apparantly it doesn't work for people with IPs starting with 7...

    1. Re:And yet by mieses · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone know why?
      I have an IP starting with 7 and skypeout calls still consume credits.

    2. Re:And yet by 31551551991 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Same problem here. I just paid $10 for free calls and consumed 7 cents to test it out. What a scam!

    3. Re:And yet by Abit667 · · Score: 0, Informative

      I've got a 7x. IP as well and I can't even use the service as I don't have any skype credit, it just keeps asking me to buy it. Even if I do the +1 thing and using either 2.0 or 2.5 clients.

      It seems a lot of people with IPs starting in 7 get the exact same problem. Skype should really fix this, it's a pretty large netblock.

    4. Re:And yet by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend's IP starts with 7 and it wasn't working for her! I figured it was a Rogers issue (since their internet stability is bollocks in a bag) but if you're not on the same ISP that would be a very odd coincidence. My GF is working with Skype to resolve the issue. They think it's a routing problem.

    5. Re:And yet by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I did notice that earlier tonight... but I believe it should be fixed now. I'm not 100% on that, but I think I just made a call for free, and my IP begins with a 7.

    6. Re:And yet by rdx123 · · Score: 1

      The problem is indeed fixed.

    7. Re:And yet by Ragingguppy · · Score: 1

      If skype wants to improve there offering then why don't they improve the Linux client so that it doesn't crash my sound driver on my sound card. I've tried to get the problem fixed by talking the the Alsa developers and the kernel developers but it seems its a problem with skype. Open Source programs don't have this problem. It prevents me from using the software all together sometimes.

  3. Not For Everyone by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 4, Informative

    Note to submitters/editors: Not everyone lives in US/Canada.

    1. Re:Not For Everyone by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Exactly, Also does anyone have any good numbers to call in the US?

    2. Re:Not For Everyone by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think it's only free from within the US to the US. Europe-to-the-US still costs money because they want people to buy their overseas services.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    3. Re:Not For Everyone by Baricom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (202) 775-0101

    4. Re:Not For Everyone by metasecure · · Score: 0

      This free offering is great, free calls to Canada and USA, however I think that Skype should begin offering SkypeIN numbers in Canada. Right now I am using www.vbuzzer.com for an incoming # in Toronto and their client and service leaves something to be desired. Skype all in all has been pretty decent, with eBay's acquisition, hopefully it will get better. And yes, this is definately a loss-leader to bring people onto their software.

    5. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth do you reach that conclusion ?
      Because it's hosted in the USA ? Because most of the work is done in the USA ?

      So by that I should assume that Google is US-centric too ?

      Get off your high horse and stop thinking you're the only place in the universe that matters. I'm sure that there are FAR more Slashdot readers in the "rest of the world" than in the United States. So, if you wanted to divide everyone into two groups, USA and "The Rest", then the USA is in fact a minority audience. You might be have a majority of readers on a country by country basis, but when it's USA vs The World... we outnumber you significantly.

      Please take that into consideration, especially when posting about a service that is available globally

      (Note, I don't know actual readership figures, but this is a pretty obvious conclusion to draw and I don't think anyone in their right mind would disagree with this)

    6. Re:Not For Everyone by Cheapy · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean those other lands outside of North America aren't just for tourists?

      Whoa...I'm gonna need to sit down after learning this...

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
    7. Re:Not For Everyone by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2, Funny

      867-5309.

      For a good time, call...

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    8. Re:Not For Everyone by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Incorrect. It's only free from within the US and Canada (not just the US), TO within the US and Canada. For example, sitting in Montreal, I can call Dallas for free, or I can call Toronto for free, or somebody in LA can call me for free.

    9. Re:Not For Everyone by Zemran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot is a global community and Skype is a product that has been released globally so in this case it should be made clear. If it was talking about some new Taco Bell sauce then no one outside the US would even stop to read it and it would not matter.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    10. Re:Not For Everyone by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

      Note to fellow Slashdotters: Not all Americans are as self-centered as "OverlordQ" apparently is. Please don't imagine he speaks for all of us--it's his kind (Republicans, mostly) that give America a bad name.

    11. Re:Not For Everyone by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      http://slashdot.org/faq/editorial.shtml#ed850

      Slashdot seems to be very U.S.-centric. Do you have any plans to be more international in your scope?

      Slashdot is U.S.-centric. We readily admit this, and really don't see it as a problem. Slashdot is run by Americans, after all, and the vast majority of our readership is in the U.S. We're certainly not opposed to doing more international stories, but we don't have any formal plans for making that happen. All we can really tell you is that if you're outside the U.S. and you have news, submit it, and if it looks interesting, we'll post it.

      It is worth noting that there is a Japanese Slashdot run by VA Japan. While we helped them a little in their early days, they essentially run their own content without any real involvement from us... none of us can read Kanji! There are currently no plans to do other language or nation specific Slashdot sites.

      Answered by: CmdrTaco
      Last Modified: 10/3/04

    12. Re:Not For Everyone by boldra · · Score: 1
      If it was talking about some new Taco Bell sauce then no one outside the US would even stop to read it and it would not matter.
      There's at least one Taco Bell in Sydney.

      Anyway, would anyone inside the US read a story about a new sauce on Slashdot? Food journalism isn't what this site's famous for.
      --
      I've been posting on the net since 1994 and I still haven't come up with a good sig!
    13. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in good ol' Rhode Island, USA, that number will get you "Gem Plumbing and Heating"

      Yes, they did go out of their way to get that phone number.

      --
      BMO

    14. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh man, there must be thousands of them in mexico right? those guys love the tacos!

    15. Re:Not For Everyone by binarybum · · Score: 1

      "this is a pretty obvious conclusion to draw and I don't think anyone in their right mind would disagree with this"

        Oh dear, I'd be a rich man if I could write a script clever enough to filter out any permutation or paraphrasing of this statement - it's the hallmark of idiocy. People claiming just this have wasted massive amounts of other people's time throughout history.

      --
      ôó
    16. Re:Not For Everyone by asavage · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Based on the last location poll, only around 50% are from North America. As that includes Canadians and Mexicans, there are more non-Americans then Americans. It is of course run by Americans and they can do whatever they want.

    17. Re:Not For Everyone by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Most site visitors do not vote in the polls.

    18. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if anything you should realize that Americans don't vote.

    19. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About time to wake up and realize there's a big big world outside your sandbox.

    20. Re:Not For Everyone by warrigal · · Score: 1

      > Most site visitors do not vote in the polls. and...?

    21. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      867-5309. For a good time, call...

      Mom, is that you?!

    22. Re:Not For Everyone by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey dumbass - you might want to read the slashdot FAQ.

    23. Re:Not For Everyone by Firehed · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      or somebody in LA can call me for free
      As mentioned in TFS (and, I'd imagine, TFA), the SkypeIn service isn't free. I'm assuming they have a Vonage-esque model where in-network calls are free, so unless it's another Skype user calling, it's not free for you or the caller. In fact, seeing that you're in Montreal, I'd expect some decent long-distance fees on the caller's end.
      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    24. Re:Not For Everyone by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Well atleast somebody knew where I was coming from with my comment :-(

      Oh well, this *is* slashdot after all, can't expect them to have read anything.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    25. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...well, not just...

      The other half is inhabited by evil terrorists and unlawful combatants, which should be incarcerated without a trial.

      Home of the free? Sheesh.

    26. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's rich, Darren, you calling somebody a dumbass.

    27. Re:Not For Everyone by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

      Nothing I see in the FAQ says we Americans have to be provincial pigs. It's possible to run a site with a little consideration and tact, you know. And I'll also point out that plenty of Americans either living abroad or with a need to call abroad could have benefited from a better article summary.

    28. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, make that land of the free. Yes, I made a mistake, being the evil foreigner I am.

    29. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Us' - I thought you said you were japanese?

    30. Re:Not For Everyone by Dis*abstraction · · Score: 1

      This may blow your mind, but not all Americans are white.

    31. Re:Not For Everyone by denominateur · · Score: 3, Funny

      JOURNALISM is not what this site is famous for :)

    32. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh right - so you're of japanese ethnicity, american nationality then?

      I thought all americans were blue or red actually!

    33. Re:Not For Everyone by jm1234567890 · · Score: 1

      What's that? Does that phone number do something special?

    34. Re:Not For Everyone by crache · · Score: 1

      RIAA number with a mailbox if you stay on the line (=...

    35. Re:Not For Everyone by taskforce · · Score: 1

      305.6664366 Jack Thompson, videogame laywer. As Publicly available from Florida Bar website: http://www.floridabar.org/names.nsf/All/07D0790038 98F95585256A830051348B?OpenDocument

      --
      My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    36. Re:Not For Everyone by davesag · · Score: 1

      We're certainly not opposed to doing more international stories
      It's not so much the lack of international stories as the myopic focus of commentary around stories that have international relevence.

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    37. Re:Not For Everyone by Spirilis · · Score: 0

      How do they know you're in Europe? Certainly not by your profile, right?

      --
      the real at&t mix
    38. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skype is actually based in Luxembourg.

    39. Re:Not For Everyone by Krokce · · Score: 1

      Have anyone tried using proxy? Does it work?

    40. Re:Not For Everyone by wackysootroom · · Score: 1

      This must be Skype's response to AOL's announcement that they will be integrating voip into AIM. Too bad that Skype doesn't give out a free incoming phone number like AOL will.

    41. Re:Not For Everyone by azuretek · · Score: 1

      I'd love to mod you down, it's obvious he means call him using skype to his regular phone. Thus no extra charges. Sorry for being a jerk but I'm tired of people correcting eachother for senseless bullshit like this, somebody always has to be right on ./

    42. Re:Not For Everyone by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 1

      Note to submitters/editors: Not everyone lives in US/Canada. /joke on/ Right only the people that matter do. /joke off/

    43. Re:Not For Everyone by ChildeRoland · · Score: 1

      What a fucktard. And you got +5 insightful. Skype is a Scandinavian company, but I guess that won't stop people like you from their american bashing.

      --
      The mark of a mature person is not creating arbitrary criteria for considering others mature.
    44. Re:Not For Everyone by orasio · · Score: 3, Funny

      And people from the US don't like to vote. And votes from Florida are very difficult to count. So results are very skewed.

    45. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a proxy server. You too can be from the U.S. or Canada to make free calls :-)

    46. Re:Not For Everyone by uniqueUser · · Score: 1

      If you don't live in US/Canada, why would you need skype? We can call land lines now, there is no need for you to call us.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    47. Re:Not For Everyone by Feyr · · Score: 1

      i dont use skype usually, but we tried it yesterday.

      skype-to-skype has always been free, the news here is that skype-to-POTS anywhere in the US and canada is free.
      back to the OP's point, that means someone in LA, using skype, calling him on his POTS (phone) line, gets to make his call for free. or that he, using skype, can call anywhere in the US and canada

    48. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He ment Slashdot is run by Americans

    49. Re:Not For Everyone by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      Ken sent me.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    50. Re:Not For Everyone by denjin · · Score: 1

      I thought American tourists only went to Yellowstone to feel the bears. They leave the continent?

    51. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot, Kettle, Black... Eh, you worthless semen stain?

    52. Re:Not For Everyone by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

      Well, don't cry about it.

      --
      MadOgre.com
    53. Re:Not For Everyone by Firehed · · Score: 1

      My apologies if you're able to interpret everyone's post exactly as it was intended rather than how it was written. I swear someone has a modding vendetta against me right now (I dunno how, seeing that I've never had a mod point to abuse). It's not a matter of being right, it's a matter of having the post be accurate. While most things are dead obvious to me, the OP's meaning wasn't at all if he meant what you said.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    54. Re:Not For Everyone by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I meant call my landline. I do have a landline.

      Regular long distance charges aren't much either. I think that from montreal to anywhere in north america is usually about 10 cents a minute.

    55. Re:Not For Everyone by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Almost certainly by doing geolocation on your IP. It is often possible to take somebody's IP and narrow down the exact city (or even sometimes borough) they're in, and it's almost always possible (With few rare exceptions) to get the country. IP blocks are allocated to ISPs in certain countries, and lots of people sell (or offer freely) databases that you can look up any IP's country in.

    56. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting how there can be non-Americans on North America.

    57. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      azuretek azuretek@gmail.com said:

      I'd love to mod you down, it's obvious he means call him using skype to his regular phone. Thus no extra charges. Sorry for being a jerk but I'm tired of people correcting eachother for senseless bullshit like this, somebody always has to be right on ./
      Actually, it's "/.", as in "slash followed by a dot." But considering how 95% of the world's population lives outside of the United States and Canada (and considering how liberal Slashdotters are) I'd assume that little technicality would be more important. I'm not just talking about the European countries, either: the nice people of Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea would like some free VoIP too. The best deal I could find is a ¥6/min. calling plan offered by Yahoo! BroadBand. It's nice, but I'd like it to be free.

      Oh, I don't fear you as a mod, azuretek, because if you're eating the troll bait I doubt you'd have too many posts worthy enough to raise your karma.

    58. Re:Not For Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And users named 'orasio' are fucking morons.

    59. Re:Not For Everyone by orasio · · Score: 1

      I think you are trying to get advantage of the fact that I am not a native english speaker, and I could misinterpret you.
      I'm sorry, moron, just stop insisting, I am not fucking you.

  4. It's a TRAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Run!

    It's an eleborate plan to get you 'signed up'.

  5. Looking Forward To... by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm looking forward to calling my current land line provider, AT&T, and tell them I'm switching because of their choice to hand over phone records to the NSA. I'm sure VoIP won't be much more secure, but I hope if enough people do this they get the message.

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    1. Re:Looking Forward To... by plalonde2 · · Score: 1
      You forget one important landline feature you want to keep. SkypeOut can't dial 911.

      Love SkypeOut, but it has serious limitations.

    2. Re:Looking Forward To... by kupan787 · · Score: 1

      And that is what my cell phone is for. I currently have a land line via ATT. I was on the "life line" service (cost me $4/month, and was VERY basic services). I have not used my land line in over 2 years, and am going to cancel (its a bitch, can't do it via the web, have to call them so they can convince you not to cancel). I am sure at some point in my life, 911 will be nice to have, but I have only called it once (car accident, so it was via cell phone) in 23 years. I could care less if VoIP providers (or SkypeOut) gives me 911 access, if I absolutely need it, I have a cell phone. Now I just need a reasonably priced wi-fi phone that is skype ready, and I am good to go!

    3. Re:Looking Forward To... by BewireNomali · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most landlines are powered. So they still work during power outages - cell phones don't... as long as you don't have a phone that otherwise depends on electricity.

      That alone is worth the cash.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    4. Re:Looking Forward To... by tapo · · Score: 4, Informative

      By U.S. law, even a disconnected phone line is able to dial 911.

      --
      "Joy is contagious," he said, peering into the microscope.
    5. Re:Looking Forward To... by seinman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Last I checked, cell phones run on batteries. You know, the whole portability thing.

    6. Re:Looking Forward To... by kupan787 · · Score: 1

      Most landlines are powered. So they still work during power outages - cell phones don't...

      Last time I checked, my cell phone still operated during a power loss, seeing as how it is run off a battery. I charge it every night, so it is fully powered the next day, and it generally lasts me two days between charges (if I forget to charge it at night), coupled with the fact that he power has never gone off for more than a few hours at a time (and I live in California!), I don't see this as an issue at all. This feature alone is NOT worth the cash to me.

    7. Re:Looking Forward To... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the GP was talking about the entire network, not just the handset.

      During 9-11 the mobile network went down, but the POTS lines were still working.

    8. Re:Looking Forward To... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where to start...

      If you remember 9-11 wasn't a power failure, it was one of the main towers going down (I was 2 blocks away during the whole thing) I still had service, but couldn't make calls (after the second plane hit I still received a text message). The network was saturated. Some people got calls over the remaining towers.

      And sure the POTS were technically working, but they were so overloaded it was impossible to place a call for 2 hours afterwards.

      I ended up IM'ing people in other states from in internet cafe and tell them to try calling my family (also outside NYC). They got right through.

    9. Re:Looking Forward To... by BewireNomali · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The networks, the towers..... DON'T run on batteries.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    10. Re:Looking Forward To... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hmm... during the big blackout in August 2003, my cellphone had no trouble connecting to a tower (which was handy, since I was able to browse news sites to find out that the power wasn't just out locally, and would be out for a while). I imagine enough towers have emergency generators to keep the network up.

    11. Re:Looking Forward To... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you're smoking or why you're making this BS up, but every wireless telco I know of has battery backup at their tower sites. quite a few have generators + diesel as well

    12. Re:Looking Forward To... by Baddas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, most cell towers are on independent power backup. They often have a UPS with an on-site generator.

      Mind you, that's not ALL of them, but enough that the network doesn't go down entirely in disasters.

    13. Re:Looking Forward To... by incast · · Score: 1

      Exactly. During the August 2002 blackout, my area was without power for a day and a half and cell phones worked just fine. Even the paging networks were still operational IIRC. I didn't even think about how they were powered at the time!

    14. Re:Looking Forward To... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be honest. You have no idea how a cell tower is constructed or for example that most contain a UPS and diesel generator.

    15. Re:Looking Forward To... by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      Back in my day you just called the fire/police/ambulance directly. It still works just fine, and in some cases works better than 911.

      I've been forced to do just that here since the 911 operator for my area is located in a town 45 minutes away and had absolutely no idea where I was talking about when I called in a brush fire that was starting up.

      Considering that region wide call centers for 911 are becoming the norm rather than the exception, it rarely goes to the local emergency service anymore, you might be alot better off taking the 5 minutes to look up the local numbers, instead of getting bounced around for 5-10 minutes till they finally connect you with the right person.

    16. Re:Looking Forward To... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Skype doesn't do it...

      You live in a dream world.

      Forget everything,there is Echelon

    17. Re:Looking Forward To... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I'm from the suburbs of Pittsburgh. In most towns, if you want to dial local emergency services you dial your local prefix plus 1111. So 412-829-1111 is the local PD in certain places.

      Not as simple as 911, but when I was a kid it was almost as easy to remember.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    18. Re:Looking Forward To... by ChrisMG999 · · Score: 1

      Phonebook results for 412-829-1111
              P A Martello, (412) 829-1111, 824 Elizabeth St, Turtle Creek, PA 15145

      Someone's not gonna be happy.

    19. Re:Looking Forward To... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, I lived in Turtle Creek.

      Maybe it was 823-1111.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    20. Re:Looking Forward To... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      The networks, the towers..... DON'T run on batteries.

      But any mobile provider worth his salt will have a backup generator. I work for a power company and everytime there's some sort of outage within a few minutes there will be a couple of mobile phone providers on the phone asking if they need to fire up the generators.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    21. Re:Looking Forward To... by s.o.terica · · Score: 2, Informative
      By U.S. law, even a disconnected phone line is able to dial 911.

      Tell BellSloth that. I haven't had a landline in years and yet none of the BellSloth-serviced locations I've lived in has had a dialtone or 911 access.

    22. Re:Looking Forward To... by mathfeel · · Score: 1

      Skype encrypts the communication by default I believe. So NSA may know who you called, but (unless they are also consealing such technology as a quantum computer) not what you talked about.

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    23. Re:Looking Forward To... by michrech · · Score: 1

      CenturyTel has the same problem where I am. No dialtone and no 911. I *have* tried it.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    24. Re:Looking Forward To... by jasonwc · · Score: 1

      Actually, Skype is more secure. It uses 256 bit AES end-end encryption. See here for more details: http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/index.php?p=91 9

      From Skype's FAQ [LINK: http://www.skype.com/help/faq/privacy.html ]

      http://www.skype.com/help/faq/privacy.html

      Is Skype secure?
              Yes. When you call another Skype user your call is encrypted with strong encryption algorithms ensuring you privacy. In some cases your Skype communication may be routed via other users in the peer-to-peer network. Skype encryption protects you from potential eavesdropping from malicious users.
      Why are Skype calls encrypted?

              Skype is encrypted end-to-end because it uses the public Internet to transport your voice calls and text messages and sometimes these calls are routed through other peers. Skype encryption ensures that no other party can eavesdrop on your call or read your instant messages.
      What type of encryption is used?

              Skype uses AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) - also known as Rijndael - which is also used by U.S. Government organizations to protect sensitive, information. Skype uses 256-bit encryption, which has a total of 1.1 x 1077 possible keys, in order to actively encrypt the data in each Skype call or instant message. Skype uses 1024 bit RSA to negotiate symmetric AES keys. User public keys are certified by the Skype server at login using 1536 or 2048-bit RSA certificates.

    25. Re:Looking Forward To... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the spelling indicates Turtle Creek, it is pronounced as Turtle Crick.

    26. Re:Looking Forward To... by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      It's funny that you mentioned this. I never even thought about how the cell towers were powered until after Hurricane Katrina. While leaving New Orleans back in October, I was driving out through the east side of the city. It was a pretty ominous experience to begin with seeing as there were absolutely no street lights on anywhere. But what really made the experience kind of creepy was when I dropped the cell call I was engaged on and I realized that the cell towers in the area didn't have power either. Thankfully I didn't break down out there.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    27. Re:Looking Forward To... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      However, skype is not a phone line. It's a VoIP connection. You have to have some other kind of line to use it, and if that isn't a phone line, then you still can't call 9-1-1. Thus if you have a T1, or DSL with no phone service, or satellite...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:Looking Forward To... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By U.S. law, even a disconnected phone line is able to dial 911.

      Bullshit, I just tried, I unplug my phone, the little green light and the LCD screen turned off and I couldn't dial anything. Even the keys didn't beep anymore when I pressed them.

    29. Re:Looking Forward To... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      okay lets try this
      the towers have batteries/ generators
      cables
      the conntecting office has a room full of batteries/ and another room with generators
      (at this point you are now at the phone company (and for these folks 80 column tech is new!))
      cables
      so now we are at the NOC/Central office i would thijnk they have buildings full of batteries/generators
      cables
      any card carrying ATT folks want to comment?

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    30. Re:Looking Forward To... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Are you from dahn tahn or E'Slibberty?

      Djeet Djet or do you need to go to Gian Iggle?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    31. Re:Looking Forward To... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good God, what a fucking lameass lefty activist moron you are. I hope AT&T laughs their ass off and says good riddance to all your 900 number calls. Fucking retard.

  6. activation by amazon10x · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere that you need to pay an activation fee of $10 USD. Is this true?

    1. Re:activation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The caller can be FROM anywhere, right? ~coward

    2. Re:activation by toxcspdrmn · · Score: 2, Informative

      No - I tried it today and it Just Works(TM).

      --
      "E pur si muove!" - attributed to Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642
    3. Re:activation by BewireNomali · · Score: 3, Informative

      no. I didn't have to.

      I tested it by creating a new UID. The first two times I tried calling a friend's mobile phone, I got error messages. The third time and every time after was smooth sailing. The sound isn't the best, not cell phone quality, but it works. The number showed up as "000123456" on the recipient's phone, so its usefulness is limited; those who screen calls would likely not pick up, and since you can't get incoming on it without upgrading - well.

      If you have an outgoing number, I'm sure you can solve this issue by being issued an incoming number. IMO, it seems to be a loss leader of sorts, to get folks to upgrade to paid service.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    4. Re:activation by amazon10x · · Score: 1

      Nope, both people have to reside in the United States/Canada

    5. Re:activation by CMiYC · · Score: 1


      If you have an outgoing number, I'm sure you can solve this issue by being issued an incoming number. IMO, it seems to be a loss leader of sorts, to get folks to upgrade to paid service.


      Subscribing to SkypeIN does not change your outgoing ID. It still shows 0123456789.

    6. Re:activation by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      I've been getting similar results. Calling land or cell lines has a lower quality. Talking directly accross the network to someone is on par with any POTS phone service I've ever used. Even when running skype on a wireless connection through my PDA.

    7. Re:activation by Gary0G · · Score: 0

      FYI, I just tried calling into a WebEx conference call and it did not work. Specifically, when you use the keypad to dial the meeting number, WebEx constantly misinterprets the dialed numbers.

  7. Only to the US and Canada... by NemosomeN · · Score: 3, Informative

    One of Skype's biggest perks is cheap international calling. Submitter sucks, should have put that in the summary. It's in the fucking article's title, fps.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
    1. Re:Only to the US and Canada... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I didn't RTFA, but does this new service include free incoming international calls?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Only to the US and Canada... by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      Incoming calls are always free (Though if you want to get them from land lines, you need to pay for a phone number). The people calling you have to pay long distance if the number you chose is long distance to them, but you can select a number with no regard to where you physically reside. If you are travelling from the USA to Chile, for example, it would be a good idea to get a USA number so your friends back home could make a local (Or at least domestic) call, which would be free for both of you.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    3. Re:Only to the US and Canada... by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Submitter should have stated: Service is free only to USA and Canada, from within USA and Canada.

    4. Re:Only to the US and Canada... by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      I've been looking at the rates we could be paying to call back to Japan between our current landline provider and VOIP alternatives.

      This is what I came up with: (All in CAD)

      Primus $0.10/min (Current landline)
      Yak $0.06/min (Alternate landline)

      Skype $0.027/min
      CallCentric $0.035/min
      SipPhone $0.04/min
      IConnect $0.05/min

      As you can see SkypeOut is cheapest but you need to pay a minimum of $15 up front whether you are using it or not. We don't call Japan that often and it tends to be less than $5/month with perfect voice quality.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    5. Re:Only to the US and Canada... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      One addition worth noting:

      Yahoo Messenger with Voice to Japan is $0.019/minute ($0.110 to mobile phones) which is cheaper than Skype. Personally, I also feel a little more comfortable dealing with Yahoo than Ebay/Skype.

      Otoh, for computer to computer, Skype seems to have become the de facto standard. I have both but am in Skype more often although it is not my first choice.

    6. Re:Only to the US and Canada... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      My international calls are free....when using skype to skype (PC to PC). Top that sucka!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  8. New partnership? Something else? by Sosarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did Skype suddenly form a new partnership with someone to handle these calls?

    Or is this some sort of grab for customers so that they can have more P2P nodes?

    Just some initial thoughts.

    1. Re:New partnership? Something else? by kupan787 · · Score: 1

      Did Skype suddenly form a new partnership with someone to handle these calls?

      ebay perhaps?

    2. Re:New partnership? Something else? by Sosarian · · Score: 1

      Sure ebay has money, but ebay generally isn't a giant phone infrastructure that gives them new places to make calls from.

      People I call on Skype get caller IDs from some very weird places.

  9. The AOL of VOIP by Zemran · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Skype is the AOL of VOIP and they are desperate to get everyone into their camp before people realise that they can have the world if they stay outside of that camp. True VOIP offers you the same freedom that the real internet offers those that are/were not AOL subscribers. I have a dial in line for free on VOIP and I can dial out for free already. I can call many countries for free. I do not need a restricted cobbled service just because it has a good marketing department.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    1. Re:The AOL of VOIP by plalonde2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please name this magical service that we in the unwashed masses may also benefit.

    2. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Geocities person complaining about AOL and marketing? That's funny.

      That aside (ha), I must ask: What service do you speak of? Free or "free as included" in your VoIP plan?

    3. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Zemran · · Score: 5, Informative

      For my UK incoming number I use www.sipgate.com
      For my US incoming number I use www.sipphone.com

      For outgoing calls I use www.voipbuster.com (they also offer an incoming number but I already had one)
      www.voipcheap.com or www.voipcheap.co.uk (same stuff really).

      I have a Sipura ATA so I do not even need to have my computer turned on to make or recieve calls. You can get other ATAs and I do not think the Sipura is the best but I bought it 3 years ago when it was.

      BTW I live in northern Thailand and with this I can call and chat to my friends as much as I like.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    4. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called VaporVOIP.

      I forget who makes it...phantom something or other.

    5. Re:The AOL of VOIP by icedcool · · Score: 1

      Mod parent witty.

      --
      Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
    6. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad this does no good for the 330 million people in North America. The same North America that Skype is giving free calls to.

    7. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Too bad this does no good for the 330 million people in North America.

      How do you work that one out? It works for anyone that has a credit card wherever they are on the planet. As I said, I am currently in Northern Thailand.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    8. Re:The AOL of VOIP by mikapc · · Score: 1

      Skype is not the AOL of VOIP. I've tried other services like dialpad and the quality and reliabilty just don't compare. With skype you get crystal clear audio quality with few dropped calls.

    9. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent +1: Ice Ice Baby (too cold.)

    10. Re:The AOL of VOIP by asadsalm · · Score: 1

      From the site:
      Important: Customers who sign up with sipgate for geographic phone numbers in the UK, must reside within the UK.

    11. Re:The AOL of VOIP by TakeyMcTaker · · Score: 1

      I personally use Gizmo Project www.gizmoproject.com -- software front-end to sipphone.com, which has been reviewed by several magazines as having a better interface than Skype, and their Call-In service is a little cheaper. They offer 775 area code Call-In numbers for free. They also offer true SIP routing, so you can call numbers at several other SIP services (like Earthlink VoIP and many University campus phones) internationally for free, and they can call you for free, unlike Skype which involves single service/software lock-in. I can also use many free SIP software and low-cost hardware alternatives to connect to the same Gizmo account, like my Windows Mobile SIP phone software, and D-Link VoIP router. PSTN calls are about 1 cent a minute US, with some international rates better than Skype too.
              I may just use Skype rather than my 1000 Gizmo Call-Out minutes this year, to make them last longer, and switch back as soon as the New Year hits. :) Those 1000 cents may still be handy for long international calls.
              I'll also use my WinMobile phone with Sprint $15/mo unlimited EVDO/WiFi 'Net, and SIP or Skype, to save my minimal airtime minutes for days I can't get any 'Net connection. :) I also use my Gizmo Call-In number as my primary, since I can recieve calls or check my voicemail-emails on almost any 'Net capable device, all without using any airtime minutes, unlike my cell voicemail. That way I can pay the bare-minimum cell plan and still never go over. The land line is now relegated to DSL and 911. The total cost is much less than my previous Land+cell+DSL+LongDist+airtime, even after the recent addition of my EVDO wireless 'Net service, faster DSL upgrade, and multiple new phone-in area codes, for both me and my spouse. I can't wait for pure WiFi/WiMAX everywhere access and Fiber to home/node, so I can drop the haggard PSTN system entirely.

      No wonder the telco monopolies are running scared yelling "Save me FCC and NSA!".

    12. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I've tried voipbuster. They didn't have a Linux client, and when I tried the Windows client, it was laggy as hell, and despite me giving them a dollar, they still cut the phone call off at the 1 hour mark. They may have fixed that now, but I stuck with skype, because despite me having to pay them money, I could use their service on linux, and it didn't give me 5 seconds of lag during calls. Now, skype is free (for my usage). I am sticking with skype.

      To be fair though, I do have issues with Skype. Their payment system has gotten much much better than it used to be, but it's still very fascist. I don't remember dealign with anyone else who I had to call and beg them to take my money.

    13. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds so simple even my grandparents could use it! Thanks!

    14. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Zemran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With a true SIP provider you can call any other SIP phone regardless of physical location on the planet. The SIP protocol allows you to simply dial a SIP address and talk to that person. The quality of service is down to your provider and just like AOL, Skype do tend to provide a reasonable service. The problem is that with Skype you can only talk to other Skype phones, it is not open, just like AOL was not open. If you go to a good SIP povider you can have a good clear call and have a better breakout deal and talk to anyone on any other SIP service for free. VOIP should not be hamstrung by some startup trying to claim the territory as their own.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    15. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I live in Northern Thailand and I managed to work this one out, if you want me to do it for you a small charge is all I would want in return :p

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    16. Re:The AOL of VOIP by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

      That's a very uninformed statement. Skype is far from desperate. Did you see how much money eBay bought them for? Skype-to-Skype calls are free, and the more people that use Skype, the cheaper it gets. Call quality is very good, there are no restrictions on call length, it includes conference calls and video, instant chat, file sharing, etc.

      The largest problems with Skype are security-related. Hackers can use Skype to relay TCP communications, effectively hacking networks from inside the firewall. And since the communication to the Skype client is encrypted and obfuscated (and it is very difficult to determine which traffic is actually Skype traffic), you can make it impossible to trace the traffic back to the hacker. Here's a link to a Black Hat Europe presentation on the subject:

      http://www.secdev.org/conf/skype_BHEU06.handout.pd f (In case you can't tell from the ".pdf" at the end of the filename, that links directly to a PDF. ;-)
    17. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I do not use a computer client as to me that seems to defeat the object. With an ATA you just plug regular phones into it and use them just like a regular phone even when the computer is turned off. You can get WiFi versions etc. as well so you can easily be OS independent if you use VOIP.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    18. Re:The AOL of VOIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gizmo: 26 c per minute
      Skype: 21 c per minute
      Other options: I don't have the OS software to run them, the "hardware" solution requires buying a lot of equipment I can't afford.

      If Gizmo is first to offer a phone number in my own country, I might swap. Unlike you, I don't expect to receive any calls via UK or USA. At the moment, Skype is closer (Hong Kong).

      My local phone company offers free local calls within the system, so it might end up the best choice for now.

  10. Only good until end of 2006 by CyberZCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's only guaranteed until the end of 2006. So most likely it's one those things to get people hooked on using the service and more willing to pay the charges after this year. But hey, the business model works for drug dealers. Once you get addicted to the sample drug, you'll be a long-term customer.

    Conspiracy theory: The reason is free is because it's funded by the NSA, that way they won't need to ask anyone for phone records. Shhhhhhhhhhh

    1. Re:Only good until end of 2006 by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      So, if Skype is an NSA project...

      and if Slash is a DARPA project...

      then... hmm, where can I go with this.... anyone?

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  11. Huh. by AWhiteFlame · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just tried calling my cell phone on it from my old Powerbook G4 Ti @ 500 Mhz with OS X Tiger. Works -excellently-. No activation or anything needed to my account. Downloaded latest version, ran it, and it worked right "out of the box".

    --
    "Everything worth innovating today will go to court tomorrow."
  12. This offer is valid until..... by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    December 31, 2006. After that, They are unsure of what they are going to do. I remember a company called dialpad years ago that did something similar, except in reverse, they started out giving unlimited free calling to anyone. Then they cut it down to 10 minutes, 5 minutes, then 1 minute and then they were forced to shut down because no one would subscribe. I'm sure this isn't the case with Skype but given they're past record I'm not sure this is a good idea.

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:This offer is valid until..... by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      Well, sure it probably is to hook people into buying Skype out. But that's a good idea for alot of people anyway. I just moved overseas and have spent many hours (~10) talking to my family on Skype out and so far it has cost me 5 bucks. Pretty sweet to someone who remembers when 10c/min was all the rage.

      I am aware that I sound like an advertisment.

  13. Not as useful to someone with a cellphone by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I already have a cellphone that has enough monthly minutes that, for as little as I use the phone, it might as well just be unlimited. And I can take it with me anywhere, too.

    Nonetheless, it's kind of neat making these free phone calls with Skype and hearing the people's voices come out of my computer speakers.

    Have to see if I can get through to Dial-a-Song at 718-387-6962. Now it's free if I call from home as well as work...

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:Not as useful to someone with a cellphone by mailman-zero · · Score: 1

      Dial-a-song's been broken for a while... I call it every weekend a few times to see if it's working again, and it just rings and rings and rings.

      TMBG ROCKS!

      --
      Let's play video games with mailmanZERO
    2. Re:Not as useful to someone with a cellphone by bobstay · · Score: 2, Informative
      Nonetheless, it's kind of neat making these free phone calls with Skype and hearing the people's voices come out of my computer speakers.

      Suggestion: Get a headset.

      If you're using your computer speakers, it's more than likely that the person at the other end is hearing their own voice too, fed back into your microphone, and delayed by half a second or so.

      Hearing yourself is really annoying.

    3. Re:Not as useful to someone with a cellphone by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Actually, the microphone that I use is reasonably directional and noise-cancelling; as long as I keep the volume at a reasonably low level on my speakers, nobody I call seems to be getting an echo--or at least not one that's noticeable enough to complain to me about.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    4. Re:Not as useful to someone with a cellphone by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      If you're using your computer speakers, it's more than likely that the person at the other end is hearing their own voice too, fed back into your microphone, and delayed by half a second or so.

      That's my experience. Both parties need a headset or even an old fashioned handset to prevent this feedback. Otherwise it's unusable.

  14. And since Skype is owned by an American company, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we can safely assume that all our Skype calls are screened by good ol' NSA.

  15. This is useless. by natrius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Almost everyone who has a cell phone has free domestic long distance. This sounds like an amazing offer, but it's giving people nothing they didn't have before. It might get a few more people to actually try Skype, but the practical uses of this offer are almost nonexistent.

    1. Re:This is useless. by Marsmensch · · Score: 1

      I see some potential impact among people who live outside of the US and Canada who will be able to call the acquaintances for free, but I'm not sure how many actual users this represents.

      --
      Slashdot: news from nerds.
    2. Re:This is useless. by Marsmensch · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I'm correcting myself here. It turns out only users IN the US or Canada can call for free, to numbers in the US of Canada.

      --
      Slashdot: news from nerds.
    3. Re:This is useless. by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      I just tried the Skype homepage direct from outside the USA, and then again using a USA proxy server.

      From outside the USA the page looked the same as always.

      Using the proxy server within the USA (the same one I had to use to get them to take my credit card!), there's a big message that says "Free calls within the US and Canada to all phones", accompanied by this image.

      If you have access to a VPN connection via the US, I assume you could take advantage of this, but at the same time, I think most people who have access to a VPN in the US don't care about 2 cents a minute.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    4. Re:This is useless. by massysett · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Almost everyone who has a cell phone has free domestic long distance. This sounds like an amazing offer, but it's giving people nothing they didn't have before. It might get a few more people to actually try Skype, but the practical uses of this offer are almost nonexistent.

      I have a cell phone and planned to use only it when I moved into this apartment, but the service is very unreliable here. Calls drop all the time. Then I got Vonage, which was good for several months, but then went downhill. Now I have an old fashioned phone. Cell phones don't solve all problems yet.

    5. Re:This is useless. by Peyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      free domestic long distance

      What's that thing you get in the mail each month from your provider? A donation request? The cheapest cell phone plans anymore run $40 for 750 anytime minutes and unlimited nights and weekends, if you're lucky. I pay $15/mo for 150 anytime minutes on my cell phone, but that's a rare exception (threatening to leave after being a customer for 2-3 years works wonders sometimes). I also pay $15/mo for 500 minutes with Vonage (and a very low rate after that such that I would need to use 750 minutes before it reached the same cost as the unlimited plan.

      So, for $30/mo, I'm getting a lot more than someone paying $40 for a low-end cell phone plan. "Free long distance" is only a good deal if you're monthly rate is low enough to make it worth it. How many minutes do you talk long distance anyway?

      --
      What?
    6. Re:This is useless. by Elaarni · · Score: 1

      Most Major cellphone providers in Canada have no such "free" long distance calling, and in many cases still charge $0.15 - $0.25 per minnute for long distance. Not to mention all cellphone plans have a limit of minutes per month on your plan, then overages will own you. So no, its not even close to useless.

  16. All you need is... by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1
    1. Re:All you need is... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd stay away from the really cheap analog headsets. If you want to use your computer for anything except a dedicated VoIP terminal, they're obnoxious in a major way.

      Unless your computer has multiple analog audio outs, and you can set it up so that Skype uses one and your regular audio uses the other, every time you want to make or answer a call you'll have to swap cables. Not cool.

      My feeling is that to use Skype, most people are going to want a USB headset or phone, so they can leave it attached all the time.

      On another note, does anyone know if there is a USB-to-POTS adaptor (that would allow you to use a real telephone) which is compatible with Skype for Mac OS X? I've been browsing through the list of VoIP stuff at NewEgg and it's very Windows-centric. I'm curious as to whether there's some sort of a standard USB device that they appear as, or whether every device and dongle requires special proprietary drivers.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:All you need is... by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Well, I *think* that USB "sound cards" are fairly standard, because I use a USB handset on Gentoo Linux, and the relevant kernel module is called snd-usb-audio or some such, not snd-usb-[manufacturer] or whatever.

      It shouldn't be too hard to take an existing USB sound card with audio out and microphone ports and hack up a phone adaptor for it yourself - it would be a pretty cool project.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    3. Re:All you need is... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Does the phone (your USB one) do anything besides the audio I/O? Can you use it to dial, for example?

      The problem I foresee is that most of the generic USB profiles (like USB sound device) don't include any control channels that would allow the handset to communicate with the VoIP software in order to ring, do hold/transfer/mute, or dial. Maybe you could do them through audio signals on the line, just like DTMF dialing is done on POTS, but I don't think that's how the Windows-based USB phones work. I'm pretty sure they're using some sort of proprietary device profile and driver in order to interface the hardware to Skype.

      On my Mac, I have a Griffin iMic, which is a generic USB audio interface, to give me an extra analog audio I/O channel. Right now I have a headset plugged into it, but I've often thought about making a balun and attaching it to a regular phone. It's not particularly hard, and there are quite a few plans around for converting line-level audio to telephone audio (make your own hold music system, etc.), but the problem for me is generating the ring tone. I really want something that I can plug into an analog phone and will make it function like a phone, including ring, so it would need to be able to put out 75VAC 20Hz into at least a 1 REN load. There are circuits that do this, but controlling it would probably take a serial port (via a USB to serial on a Mac, probably) in addition to the audio interface. Things start to get complicated there pretty quickly.

      There are boxes that do this as their sole purpose in life, I think just generically called "VOIP Gateways," but the ones I've seen are all SIP (or tied to a particular provider like Vonage) and don't work with Skype (or else the ones that do work with Skype are Windows-only). I have no interest in paying for VoIP, I'd just like to use a regular POTS handset to make Skype calls on my Mac. Guess I'll have to keep my Western Electric Model 500 in the closet for now.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  17. Great but.... by gregeth · · Score: 1

    I think this is wonderful that Skype is offering this. Although I read in several forums that people with IP's in the range of 70.x.x.x to 79.x.x.x. Not sure if that's true, but I have an IP in the range with Verizon DSL and am prompted with needing to buy skype credit to make a call.

    I'm guessing it's due to ISP's that are using packet shaping for VOIP, etc. Anyone else had problems with this, whether with Verizon or other ISPs?

    1. Re:Great but.... by wizzat · · Score: 1

      I assure you that Verizon doesn't care what you do with your DSL. If you got prompted to buy it with credit, either you did it wrong or Skype just wants your money. You decide...

    2. Re:Great but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skype subscribers might want to check their IP address and ISP from IP2Location.com.

  18. Warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As of the time of this posting, the free SkypeOut doesn't work for IPs starting with any number between 70 and 79!

  19. Re:Fucking Whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, like having nerds spew biased arrogant wrong headed shit on Slashdot is worth notoriety

  20. Hi is Ben there? Last name Dover? by t35t0r · · Score: 1

    Oh the prank calls that can be made with this ..all the calls come in as 1000023456

  21. Bad launch by ubercombatwombat · · Score: 1

    Skype is getting beat up by posters, you have to scroll down to feel the heat: http://share.skype.com/sites/en/2006/05/free_calls _to_all_landlines_an.html
    Seems that it does not function in the 70~80.xxx.xxx.xxx range. My ISP Qwest is in that range. In other words they missed a few of us. I use Asterisk and Telasip and don't really care. Bad marketing.

    1. Re:Bad launch by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Have you had any problems with voice quality with your ISP? Comcast is currently screwing with all VoIP customers that are not using their service and I heard that that Qwest was doing this as well.

      Also on a side note, Telasip allows you to use Asterisk? I thought that only broadvoice allows a bring your own device plan.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Bad launch by ubercombatwombat · · Score: 1

      Lumpy, Telasip, Teliax, Exgn and other allow BYOD. Qwest doesn't seem to block anything. Voice quality has been fine. Occational echo, but thats it.

    3. Re:Bad launch by smchris · · Score: 1


      Which other providers don't work?

      I mean, the news comes out that every telephone in the country is being watched -- except QWest, which refused to cooperate.

      Same week Skype comes out and says all calls in the U.S. are free! Except QWest, which doesn't seem to work.

      Coinkidink?

      The question isn't whether you're paranoid. The question is whether you are paranoid _enough_.

    4. Re:Bad launch by Noxal · · Score: 1

      I'm in that range and can dial out perfectly fine.

  22. Not working for many by Snof · · Score: 1

    Quite a few people are unable to get it to work. It seems that they attempt to limit it to US and Canadian customers based on IP, but their filter has problems. I'm unable to use the service on my internet connection (Comcast), but using my neighbors wireless network it works great. They're on a different ISP, not sure which one. I submitted a support ticket and got this (somewhat entertaining) response: "Thank you for writing to us. I appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your questions today about the error you are receiving when you are attempting to call a US number. I am sorry to hear that you encountered this situation. It does appear that this is an apparent issue. Our Engineers are working on to resolve this. I really appreciate your information on this and your patience. Your IP address will be further looked into. In the meantime and would like to apologize for any concern or inconvenience this is causing you. You may want to continue using another computer to use your SkypeOut at the moment."

  23. Any better than it was? by cmason · · Score: 1
    I got really excited about skypeout a year or so ago. I bought a bluetooth headset, got it working on my mac, installed skype, bought minutes. All of this went pretty smoothly, but I've only used about 10 of those minutes: skypeout had terrible voice quality, signficant echo, and large lag. This was calling US phone numbers from a cable modem connection in the US with > 128kbps upstream. I tried on several occassions but always the people that I called complained about the sound quality and the echo. From my perspective, making this service free does nothing to increase it's value to me; I was willing to pay but was completely dissapointed.

    I wonder if it's improved enough to be worth trying again.

    -c

    --
    "If you are an idealist it doesn't matter what you do or what goes on around you, because it isn't real anyway."-R.P.W.
    1. Re:Any better than it was? by cskrat · · Score: 1

      Have you tried a more conventional headset working through your sound card? I use a $15.00 Logitech headset with the mic plugged into my Audigy2 ZS and the speakers plugged into my mainboard audio out. Sounds perfect except for the eerie silence detection when nobody is speaking.

      --
      My God! It's full of eval()'s.
    2. Re:Any better than it was? by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      Apparently your mileage does vary... my experience has been pretty good, my girlfriend uses skypeout to make calls from Germany to her parents in Taiwan, quality is consistently good, and the costs are very low. For longer calls, she asks them to switch on the computer, and then it's free anyway.

      On the other hand, I had problems like you describe when going the other way (calling Germany from Taiwan).

    3. Re:Any better than it was? by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      A friend and I tried counting to 5 together on Skypeout and he said there was less than half a second of lag. I called my mom and didn't tell her it was an internet call until the end and she was very surprised, though she said the first 10 seconds of the call sounded a little muddy. After every 10th (or so) Skypeout call a web survey pops up asking how the call quality was. Skype really wants to be a seamless service!

    4. Re:Any better than it was? by indigest · · Score: 1

      I frequently use Skype as well as BroadVoice, which is a VoIP provider comparable to Vonage. The difference in call quality is very obvious to me. Skype's calls are fuzzy, take a long time to connect, and have intermittency problems. The worst part is the fuzziness. Broadvoice is much clearer and occasionally suffers from a mildly annoying echo effect. I wouldn't suggest using Skype unless you are cheap like me, because the call quality is just inadequate. By the way, the reason I use both services is because Skype has slightly cheaper rates on certain calls.

  24. Hm, not working. by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 1

    I'm using the linux version of Skype (1.2.0.18), and it tells me that I need SkypeOut to make outgoing calls. I have tried several times, and have even tried creating a new account. Same deal. Any ideas?

    1. Re:Hm, not working. by Bigos · · Score: 1

      Log in on the web to your skype account and set it up properly. You can do it if you select an option in one of skype menus. Then you buy out some skype credit to activate Skyoe out and can call to US for free. It's so simple :-) As added benefit you can have cheap calls to ather parts of the world. Although sound quality can be bad sometimes.

  25. Don't they have to? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't every phone have to be able to dial 911 anyway?

    I was under the impression that they couldn't cut that off, by law; similarly, you can turn on any cell phone and even if it isn't registered with the network, you can use it to dial 911. That was at least my understanding of how things worked, I admit I've never tried either.

    The house I live in currently has phone wiring, but it's a real mess and I've never used it. Some day I'll have to unscrew one of the jacks (they're all of the old 4-pin variety, and painted over anyway) and see if there's dial tone. We certainly aren't paying for anything, we use cellphones and VoIP via cable internet.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Don't they have to? by magicchex · · Score: 1

      You are correct in regards to cell phones and 911. Any cell phone that powers on will be able to call 911 no matter if it has an account attached to it or not. As long as you're within the reach of a tower, it will call 911.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    2. Re:Don't they have to? by supersnail · · Score: 2, Informative

      Problem is that technically VOIP is NOT a phone service.

      Phone in most (all?) countries are goverened by a strict set of regulations regarding billing, level of service etc. etc.

      VOIP on the other hand is a novelty application for the internet and
      is not geverned by any regulations and cannot paricipate in many regulated
      telephone services. The problem with 911,999,912,914 type services is
      that the service provider is supposed to supply subscriber details and
      location details to the emergency operator. "133t5ax0r" at rackspace
      is not quite detailed enough.

      --
      Old COBOL programmers never die. They just code in C.
    3. Re:Don't they have to? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I understand about VoIP, I was talking about POTS lines. The GP (or GGP, or somewhere up there) was saying that he retained a regular analog phone line and paid a few bucks a month in order to have it for 911. What I was saying is that you can keep your POTS phone hooked up for 911 purposes, without paying a thing. And then use VoIP for your regular (non-emergency) calls.

      The downside is that if the power or internet goes out, you won't have any service except for the ability to call 911, but if you can live with that, it might be a viable option that doesn't cost anything nor precludes your ability to call 911.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:Don't they have to? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      do yourself a favour if you do indeed have pre rj14 jacks then don't use the wire for any kind of phone calls (replace the jacks with current rj14 and wire them up with some cheap cat5 just run a single line from the demark block to each jack you use (think cat5+ hub not token ring)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  26. Also... by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 1

    I'm in the 71.*.*.* IP range, and judging by the other comments I'm seeing, this is the problem.

    1. Re:Also... by javabsp · · Score: 1

      It didn't work for me also, but using tsocks(http://tsocks.sourceforge.net/) to connect to a SOCKS proxy server with a different IP works fine. Tried calling my own cellphone, sound quality is nice, but the 0.5-1 second delay makes me feel a little weird.

  27. SkypeOut service by under_score · · Score: 2

    I've been using SkypeOut for quite some time now. I first purchased SkypeOut credit in Oct. 2004. My main motivation has been that my brother lives in Beijing and I live in Toronto. But I also talk with other family and friends quite regularly using the feature. One thing I've noticed: my connection and audio quality tend to be better to when I'm talking to my Brother in Beijing than when I'm talking to my wife while I'm travelling in the US. Skype has gradually become more and more important in my suite of communication tools. I'd much rather Skype someone than email them. I used to use Yahoo! messenger and ICQ quite a bit. I've completely stopped. Maybe they've improved, but Skype's conference call/chat feature has been extremely helpful. I did an hour-long 3-way business call between Toronto, Baltimore and London in the UK for only a few dollars!

    All that said, there's a problem too: I've been using it on my laptop and it means carrying around a headset with a microphone. The built-in mic is terrible. For anyone adopting Skype as a phone replacement (which it sill isn't for me), this is an important consideration. The big "discount" they are giving with free SkypeOut in North America will probably help adoption here a little, but I'm not convinced it will make a really big splash. I think they need to figure out a nice way to integrate with a cell-phone-like headset that still works through one's computer/laptop or on one's wireless LAN. This would be the item that would allow me to get rid of my home/office phones.

    1. Re:SkypeOut service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:SkypeOut service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netgear and Linksys offer cordless handsets for Skype users. Take a look.

    3. Re:SkypeOut service by SMS_Design · · Score: 1

      Why not just buy a bluetooth headset and a bluetooth adapter? Works well for me.

    4. Re:SkypeOut service by Dominic · · Score: 1

      Sort of like this one? http://tools.netgear.com/skype/

    5. Re:SkypeOut service by LinuxTek · · Score: 1

      Well, if your computer has bluetooth you can use any bluetooth headset with Skype. I have a Cardio 500 bt headset, and I've been using it to call with Skype. I can roam around the room free whenever I travel, and the quality is great.

      There are many people that haven't realized that bluetooth headsets are great for chat.

      --
      Signatures are supposed to be funny?
    6. Re:SkypeOut service by epiphani · · Score: 1

      I've been using skypeout for about as long - and thats also a beef I have with it. Carrying around a headset is truely annoying, but wouldnt be so bad if they had good wireless headsets. I'm not talking about those crappy little bluetooth headsets they use for cell phones - those are useless for anything other than a telephone.

      I want a stero bluetooth headset, with the headband around the back of my head, and a simple microphone. I want to be able to listen to my mp3's or videos on the same headset as I use for skype. Why dont any of these exist?

      --
      .
  28. Fascinating to me how the economics have ended up by CFD339 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I do a lot of work with Asterisk and have investigated pricing on inbound and outbound rates to such an extent that it would be considered obsessive.

    With most VoIP, inbound call phone numbers are at least as expensive to get as outbound when you get to any kind of volume. I'm not talking about 1 line for a few bucks, or a few test lines at fixed cost, but the ability to just recieve a bunch of calls at once on a phone number. It comes down to about $18 (US) for the ability to recieve each concurrent inbound call. You can get unlimited at a penny or two per minute per call, but that ends up being more expensive if you do good pooling with a fixed number of lines. Outbound can be as little as half that.

    Where is the cost in all this? The cost is the connection to the copper based system. At some point, somewhere, someone has to get paid for a link to that big addressing system.

    The sick part is, most of the big telcos are doing voip any way, and their ability to hold onto that master address space is the key last item for them to hold the power to charge what they do. ENID (including free systems) are functional -- and can work just like DNS -- but the providers wont use it.

    There's a system (ENID based, I believe) that would allow any number you dial from your regular phone or cell phone to be checked against a registry, and if a voip address is listed for it, the telco could bypass the entire infrastructure and route the call directly to the person you called over voip. So if I registered a voip address to my phone number (which I have done) and you called me from say, Verizon Wireless, they could route the call to me without going over a single bit of big telco as anything other than VoIP. No telco switching involved. It would bypass my per-minute inbound costs entirely other than my internet connection.

    It works if you call from a voip phone that knows about the registry (Asterisk based systems, for example can do this). The telcos and cell companies don't do it. Why not? As a whole, they make their money by controlling that master address -- the phone number.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  29. But I'm Po' by DaMamaJama · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a poor student who moves to a new town every four months because of the program i'm in at uni (yay co-op), i GREATLY appreciate Skype making my calls free.

    1) Because i move all the time, i don't maintain a landline;
    1) All of my family and friends are out of town;
    2) cell phones in Canada haven't been deregulated yet and Rogers, Bell, Telus, etc., charge through the nose and other unpleasant orifices.

    Skype is making my life a HECK of a lot easier. I've tried it already... a lot... and it works wonderfully.

  30. Dialpad by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I remember Dialpad ... actually my introduction to them was from the floor of one of the computer shows, it might have been Macworld Boston or NYC; I remember calling some friends from their booth and asking about the audio quality.

    Unfortunately by the time I got around to getting broadband, they had already stopped the unlimited free service, and it was all downhill from there.

    I hope whenever people get around to writing the history of VoIP that there's more than a footnote there about Dialpad, because boy were those guys just a few years ahead of their time. I think broadband penetration was just a little too light, and wireless internet hadn't hit it big enough for people to think of computers as something around their house that could be as ubiquitous as telephones ("why would I want to go into the computer room to make a phone call?"); if they had held out for a year or two longer ... well, they would have been Skype.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Dialpad by PorkNutz · · Score: 1

      Didin't dialpad make you listen to a 20 second or so advert before connecting your call? I have often wondered why this didn't catch on.

    2. Re:Dialpad by whoop · · Score: 1

      Not in the beginning. Though for me, Dialpad was the first time I saw some practical use for a Java applet. Even the cypherpunk username/password worked, they didn't check how many people were logging in at once or from different IPs. Them were the good ol' days.

    3. Re:Dialpad by misleb · · Score: 1

      Didin't dialpad make you listen to a 20 second or so advert before connecting your call? I have often wondered why this didn't catch on.

      I think you just answered your own question. Well, there is the advert thing and the fact that making phone calls from your computer is inconvenient. Might as well wonder why people don't still make phone calls standing next to a wall mounted phone box with a crank generator and 2 foot speaker cord.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    4. Re:Dialpad by zenslug · · Score: 2, Informative

      if they had held out for a year or two longer ... well, they would have been Skype.

      Skype's strength is its ability to scale. Dialpad wasn't using p2p the way Skype is, and that is the difference. It is a minimal increase in cost per user to grow Skype, but the profit is there. This doesn't apply to SkypeOut, but since they are charging for that they can cover costs (this promotion aside).

      The current promotion in North America is just to raise adoption, and as Skype said themselves, the cost is low enough to make it feasible. Skype needs to grow in this market to reach the success that is expected of them, and this is a way to speed up the growth.

    5. Re:Dialpad by ejp1082 · · Score: 1

      Dialpad was awesome my freshman year of college... most everyone used it to call home, call their girlfriends, etc. Beat the hell out of messing with calling cards. Skype is an order of magnitude better than that ever was though.

  31. Skype trying to reach performance goals ? by OneInEveryCrowd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It was mentioned when ebay bought Skype that if Skype could achieve certain performance goals that the deal would be worth an extra 1.5 billion dollars. It looks like the number of users in North America may be one of these performance goals.

    Also this is a good way to compete with Yahoo! Messenger, which was recently upgraded to use the same voice codec as skype.

    1. Re:Skype trying to reach performance goals ? by selvan · · Score: 1

      On a related note, Google talk uses the same GIPS VoiceEngine.

  32. cheap international calling - not! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

    I call my parents in Europe quite often and always keep an eye out for a good deal on international calling. I have been looking at SkypeOut rates ever since it was introduced, it is still 2x more expensive than a good phone card.

    1. Re:cheap international calling - not! by NemosomeN · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good phone cards to Asia that beat Skype are hard to find. And Skype is way easier.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
    2. Re:cheap international calling - not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps this has changed, but I used to make a lot of calls to Europe and I never found a phone card that was half as good as Skype's rates that didn't royally fuck you over in the small print.

      Sure, you can get your calls at 1 cent/minute... on top of the 50 cent connection fee, the $3/month service fee, the three-minute charge interval, the 20 minute minimum charge, etc.

      I once found a card that gave me insanely cheap rates with no extra fees at all. After a couple of hours of calls, all the credit was gone. When I called to find out why, it turned out that they had simply lied about the extra fees. Unfortunately in a situation like that there isn't much you can do to get your money back, since these are usually small operations that depend on duping at least some of their customers in order to earn money.

      I eventually gave it up and went with the best cheap service I could find at the time which was BigZoo. It was relatively pricey at 4.5 cents/minute, but they didn't play games with your money and so in the end it was cheaper. Skype is almost three times cheaper than that, and they don't play games either, so I would have been all over that. Skype's call quality is also spectacular, unlike most cheap phone cards. I don't make many calls now, but when I do, SkypeOut is it.

      Skype may not be the cheapest service out there, but as far as I've seen it's just about the cheapest service that doesn't suck.

    3. Re:cheap international calling - not! by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1

      I used Skype on my PocketPC to call the UK whilst on holiday in Florida last month, call quality was really good. Orlando Int. airport seems to have free WiFi access too.

      Lets hope that now eBay have it they continue to develop the Linux and mobile versions as there aren't that many cross platform VoIP clients.

    4. Re:cheap international calling - not! by afidel · · Score: 1

      If your folks are in one of the covered 21 countries it's pretty damn hard to beat broadvoice's unlimited world for $19.95/month, or if they are in one of the other covered countries there's an expand list of countries for $24.95. No affiliation just a happy cheapskate.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:cheap international calling - not! by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

      There aren't many cross-platform VOIP clients, but I think you're missing a point. Skype is a closed platform.

      Most other open systems use SIP: for which there are many clients for many platforms.

      Sadly Skype is closed and will not interoperate with SIP. Perhaps someone could set up a SIP gateway with an incoming number in the US given it's a free call now?

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
    6. Re:cheap international calling - not! by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1
      Most other open systems use SIP: for which there are many clients for many platforms.

      I didn't know that there were PocketPC versions of the SIP client. I do now (thanks) but when I look into it a bit more I find a problem.

      here

      You need to open/forward the following ports on your router:
      Port Protocol Description
      3478 UDP STUN service
      3479 UDP STUN service
      5002 TCP MLP protocol server
      5060 UDP SIP UAS
      5060 TCP SIP UAS
      and 2 ports (starting from the lowest) for each call from this range:
      49152-65535 UDP RTP, RTCP multimedia streaming


      OMFG! I need to open what!!
      When I was in the USA, I switched on my PocketPC, got a green WiFi light, opened Skype and simply dialled. Any guesses as to how far I would have got getting those ports forwarded in the airport lounge?

      Don't get me wrong, closed source==bad, eBay owning them==bad but the product is damn good, easy to use and calls are cheap too! Any ideas?
    7. Re:cheap international calling - not! by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

      I didn't know it was that bad, but yes- Skype does very well because it is easy to use. I use it extensively, and have rolled it out to company departments simply because It Just Works.

      I'd rather use open [encrypted] SIP, but it's just not easy enough yet. I've played with Asterisk (very cool), but the SIP clients are just too complicated.

      Perhaps the Gizmo project may change this, but I can't get it to work.

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
    8. Re:cheap international calling - not! by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1

      Maybe that 'open ports' advice was given in order to fix a specific problem. Wikipedias page says that SIP should be able to traverse certain types of NAT using STUN. I think I'll download it and try it out. I need a contingency plan in case eBay wreck Skype!

  33. Not as good as heroin by misleb · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who'd get "addicted" to poor quality phone calls that need to be made through your PC (or Mac)? For a bit more a month you can get real VoIP service with an ATA which will work with all your existing phones. The quality is indistinguishable from POTS. You get unlimited calls within North America and also some other countries. I mean, unless you REALLY can't afford an extra $15 a month or whatever, come on. Might as well try to convince a heroin addict to switch to asprin because it is cheaper (to stay with the addiction theme).

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    1. Re:Not as good as heroin by pjkeyzer · · Score: 1

      SkypeOut is free and SkypeIn is 30euros a year, so about $3(USD) a month. Vonage is $15 a month (for 500 minutes) plus the cost of the hardware (I already have a computer and headset, so the cost of Skype hardware is $0 for me). I think I've used a landline twice in the last 6 months. "Poor quality" on Skype is good enough for me, because honestly, I don't listen to CDs over the phone, so I don't care about the quality much. Why would I spend the extra money on Vonage (or any other VoIP service)?

    2. Re:Not as good as heroin by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      For a bit more a month you can get real VoIP service with an ATA which will work with all your existing phones.

      If you make any significant quantity of outgoing calls, the overall cost will be cheaper than using Skype anyway, because their outgoing rates aren't very good.

      I use Skype only for times when I am wandering down the street in some random city and country and need to make a quick international call; I can just stumble a hotspot, sit down on a stoop, and Skype away. Otherwise, when I'm in the hotel, etc., I set up the ATA properly and get better call quality, lower rates, and a proper handset.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    3. Re:Not as good as heroin by misleb · · Score: 1

      SkypeOut is free and SkypeIn is 30euros a year, so about $3(USD) a month.

      For now.

      My Speakeasy VoIP service has unlimited time and the ATA was free. I don't know why YOU would want to spend extra money for real VoIP, but I think most people would appreciate not being chained to the computer to use the phone and have to keep it running to recieve calls. But if guess if you are just that desparate to save a buck (or euro), you'll put up with about any inconvenience.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    4. Re:Not as good as heroin by misleb · · Score: 1

      I use Skype only for times when I am wandering down the street in some random city and country and need to make a quick international call; I can just stumble a hotspot, sit down on a stoop, and Skype away. Otherwise, when I'm in the hotel, etc., I set up the ATA properly and get better call quality, lower rates, and a proper handset.

      Heh, although I have found myself wandering down the street in some random city/country, I can't say that I have ever had a computer on me at the same time. It would be cool though if internet cafes had Skype installed. I'd definitely use that.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    5. Re:Not as good as heroin by Wolfkin · · Score: 1

      You people keep talking about "being chained to the computer" and there being some advantage to having to use a separate device to talk on than you do all your other communicating on. Why would I want to track down where I left my phone to make a call? I haven't had a landline for years, and when I did, had a cordless handset, so I've dealt with years of "where the heck is my phone?" and if I'm already in front of my computer (which would be most of the time), why would I want to start hunting for a phone? It's gotten where I dread receiving phone calls, since they're startling, start a mad scramble for tracking down where the phone is by listening for the ring, cut off when my battery dies, which seems like every fourth call...

      Similarly, making a phone call has been a chore as well; you can't just compose what you want to say and fire it off. Instead, you have to (after finding the phone and making sure it has minutes and it's charged, and if not, hunching over unnaturally during the call to make sure you stay close to the wall plug) wait, doing effectively nothing else, hoping they're there. If not (and usually that's the case, because who sits by the phone waiting for a call?), you have to leave a message, and hope they get back to you. All this takes way longer than just firing off an email, and part of the email's convenience is that you're at your computer for the email, so if an important IM (from your server watch, for example) comes in, you can instantly handle it.

      VOIP offers the chance to combine another separate thing to keep track of into the same unit. I'm sure I don't have to explain on /. that one's computer handles nearly *everything* in life, right? Work, reading, socializing, gaming, shopping... VOIP is just one more thing I can do at the computer, without having to suffer the inconveniences of getting up and finding and working with some tool that operates some other way.

      --
      Property law should use #'EQ, not #'EQUAL.
    6. Re:Not as good as heroin by misleb · · Score: 1

      You people keep talking about "being chained to the computer" and there being some advantage to having to use a separate device to talk on than you do all your other communicating on. Why would I want to track down where I left my phone to make a call? I haven't had a landline for years, and when I did, had a cordless handset, so I've dealt with years of "where the heck is my phone?" and if I'm already in front of my computer (which would be most of the time), why would I want to start hunting for a phone?

      Apparently you aren't in front of your computer most the time if you had trouble finding your phone. Instead of just learning to hang the darn thing up at the base station when you were done with the phone, you chained yourself to a computer. That's one way to solve the problem, I guess. Sorry, but I, like many people, like to walk around with a phone. Maybe go outside. Or just sit on the couch.

      Let me guess, you're one of those people who actually sits in front of your computer to watch a movie too. Wierd.

      It's gotten where I dread receiving phone calls, since they're startling,

      Try a new ringer setting and get a prescription for some downers.

      start a mad scramble for tracking down where the phone is by listening for the ring, cut off when my battery dies, which seems like every fourth call...

      So apparently all your problems with regular phones stem from your unwillingness to put the phone back on the base station when you are done with it.

      Similarly, making a phone call has been a chore as well; you can't just compose what you want to say and fire it off. Instead, you have to (after finding the phone and making sure it has minutes and it's charged, and if not, hunching over unnaturally during the call to make sure you stay close to the wall plug) wait, doing effectively nothing else, hoping they're there. If not (and usually that's the case, because who sits by the phone waiting for a call?), you have to leave a message, and hope they get back to you.

      Holy cow, you sound like one of those people in infomercials trying to sell some new type of vaccuum cleaner by totally exagerating the "hassles" of the "old" way. "Taking a phone call is such a chore..." Yeah, maybe if you are a quadrapalegic! The days of being teathered to a 3 foot cord in front a telephone device died about 60 years ago. I actually have an old antique telephone seat if you want to buy it. Doesn't come with a crank powered telephone, but you could easily sit a laptop on it.

      All this takes way longer than just firing off an email, and part of the email's convenience is that you're at your computer for the email, so if an important IM (from your server watch, for example) comes in, you can instantly handle it.

      You waste that much time in front of a computer and you are worried about the 15 seconds it takes to wait for someone to answer the your phone call!? You're fuckin' with me, aren't you?

      VOIP offers the chance to combine another separate thing to keep track of into the same unit. I'm sure I don't have to explain on /. that one's computer handles nearly *everything* in life, right? Work, reading, socializing, gaming, shopping... VOIP is just one more thing I can do at the computer, without having to suffer the inconveniences of getting up and finding and working with some tool that operates some other way.

      You have trouble operating fax and photo copy machines, don't you? It mean, if it doesn't have a mouse or windows you can open/close, how the hell do you work it!?

      Anyway, i thought your post was pretty amusing whether that was your intenet or not. Cheers.

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    7. Re:Not as good as heroin by Wolfkin · · Score: 1

      You waste that much time in front of a computer and you are worried about the 15 seconds it takes to wait for someone to answer the your phone call!? You're fuckin' with me, aren't you?

      Yeah.

      You have trouble operating fax and photo copy machines, don't you? It mean, if it doesn't have a mouse or windows you can open/close, how the hell do you work it!?

      This is actually true, in a limited way. I'm one of those people who you see reading the manual for the fax machine or copy machine when they've never used it before and just want to do something simple like front-and-back copies with the front in color and the back not. From separate pages. No harder to do than printing on a computer; requires 15 minutes of reading the manual on a copy machine. If the copy machine can even do it. Caveat: my last experience with a copy machine was in 2000, so maybe they're more general-purpose now.

      Anyway, i thought your post was pretty amusing whether that was your intenet or not. Cheers.

      It was supposed to be obviously funny, but in a kinda serious way. :)

      --
      Property law should use #'EQ, not #'EQUAL.
    8. Re:Not as good as heroin by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Skype's got my dollars. It's easy, it's cheap, and I only use it when I'm in danger of running out of minutes on my cell phone. Vonage can't sell me $10 of phone time to use over six months. Skype can. (Gizmo can, too, but my family already has Skype on their PCs so they got me hooked.)

      --
      For more information, click here.
  34. Skype & Security by Robotech_Master · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just to note, there are a few security concerns about Skype, its ownership by eBay, and potential security holes within the Skype network. Be aware of what you're using when you're using it.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:Skype & Security by ka0sx · · Score: 1

      this would only matter while the program is running correct?

    2. Re:Skype & Security by this+great+guy · · Score: 1

      Yes ! As most security vulnerabilities in computer programs, you need to use them in order to be vulnerable. Somehow when you stop using them you are not affected anymore.

    3. Re:Skype & Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A closed source P2P program from the authors of Kazaa! What could possibly go wrong with that?

    4. Re:Skype & Security by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      For example, there's this one: when Skype pops up a feedback form asking you how your call was, the URL it sends to pop up that form exposes various information including the phone number you just called, in clear-text.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  35. Great, my money again doesn't work for me by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, it's great that I find out when I spend money on Skype, doesn't benefit me, but rather, a nation far away that already has a lot of their telecommunications provided for free.

    Yeah, maybe I shouldn't be so selfish, but then again, when a good paying wage for a fulltime job is 200USD, here. Not even enough to pay for a small apartment a month, in this country, I'm thinking more in terms of self preservation.

    If connection costs to other telecommunication systems were really the issue, then they would allow people to call US numbers from Europe (and other places) for free.

    A thought occured to me, I some how doubt AOL users will have problems placing calls to the US for free, since the IP ranges used in AOL ISPs are shared internationally.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    1. Re:Great, my money again doesn't work for me by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      You know, it's great that I find out when I spend money on Skype, doesn't benefit me, but rather, a nation far away...

      I think the same thing every time I go to Wal-Mart. It's called globalization, you might as well learn to love it, because it ain't going away.

      Besides, a whole lot more money flows OUT of the U.S. than in, so as a country, we're not exactly making money here. The way things are going right now, it won't be too long before debt is our biggest export. (Pity there's no export market for lawyers...)

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Great, my money again doesn't work for me by magicchex · · Score: 1

      If a good wage for a fulltime job in your country doesn't even cover the cost of a small apartment, is the majority of your country homeless? Your numbers don't add up.

      --
      How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
    3. Re:Great, my money again doesn't work for me by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      > is the majority of your country homeless?

      No, but that's because you have parents, cousins, children, grandparents and friends living under one small roof. Pulling together their money, resources etc.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  36. Nothing new but really nice anyway! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.voipbuster.com/
    http://www.sipdiscount.com/
    http://www.voipcheap.com/
    voipdiscount.com
    voipstunt.com ...

    gives... well... around 40 countries free! (well... you pay 10euros for 2 or 3 months and you can call a lot of countries for 0 cent/min or 1 cent/min)

    I use it a lot (with sjphone) and for this price... this is unbeatable! But for a good VOIP, you need a good High Speed Internet Access! A delay of 1 or 2 seconds and cause a hang up before you can even try to say "hello" ;-)

    sip compatible with any hardware SIP or softphone like sjPhone (mac, pc, linux, pda...)

    sip server: sip.voipbuster.com (port 5060)
    domain: voipbuster.com
    stun server: stun.voipbuster.com

    sip server: sip1.sipdiscount.com (port 5060)
    domain: sipdiscount.com
    stun server: stun.sipdiscount.com

    etc ;-)

  37. Re:Fucking Whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why your post is at 0, man.

  38. Keep hoping they ignore it; alternative is worse. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Given the way techology and politics have been going lately, perhaps we should all be thankful for the fact that all the big telcos are doing is ignoring ENID and hoping it will go away.

    I wouldn't be surprised if they were to campaign to make it illegal if it ever starts to make significant inroads on their cartel--excuse me, business model.

    Let's see, what excuse would they use for outlawing it? Child pornography is always a guaranteed sell, but hard to work in this case. Maybe they could roll it into the next anti-terrorism bill: bypassing the POTS switching system might make the calls harder to intercept, therefore it'll only be used by terrorists, drug dealers, and MySpace users.

    I'm only half-joking here. The POTS "namespace" is going to be the big telco's Alamo: it's a gigantic source of revenue and not one they're going to let go without a fight. They'll probably lose in the long run, but it'll be long and unpleasant in the meantime.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  39. Faxes? by tktk · · Score: 1
    Anyone try Skype with a fax machine? Are there any problems?

    I'm paying for a land line at home only to send/receives faxes. Being able to use Skype with a fax would be a significant drop in costs for me.

    1. Re:Faxes? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've never tried it, but I know some people who have attempted to use fax machines on other VoIP systems with mixed results. I believe the problem stems from the psychoacoustic compression (e.g.: G.729) that's used to reduce the bandwidth requirements of calls: it's very low bitrate and designed for speech only, and doesn't have anywhere near the data-carrying capacity of a standard POTS line.

      I think some VoIP systems (Vonage) are smart enough to increase the bandwidth so as to not block fax and data calls completely, but how well it works I don't know. I'm not sure what codec Skype uses (and I suspect nobody outside of Skype does, either), but judging from the audio quality I think it's compressing pretty hard. And if the artifacts are that audible in speech, I can't help but think that a data transmission is probably going to do poorly. YMMV based on network conditions, though.

      For outgoing faxes, especially if you only send them occasionally, it might be worthwhile to give it a shot. The cost savings might be worth having to try it a few times to get it to go through, or for it to transmit very slowly. If you receive a lot of faxes though it might be a bad idea, since you can't ever be sure how many times the person on the far end will retransmit if the call fails the first time. Having a fax machine that only works some of the time, to me, is worse than not having one at all since you wouldn't be able to trust it.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Faxes? by misleb · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Skype doesn't work with fax machines.

      There are internet based fax services you can use, you know. Just scan your document and upload it to their site to send. And download any faxes you recieve. Actually, I think some do it by email. Fax machines are SOO 90's. I can't believe they are still around. :-P

      -matthew

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    3. Re:Faxes? by tktk · · Score: 1
      I prefer internet also but can't due to job factors.

      I work in land development and I'm on construction sites quite a bit. As SOP, the contractor automatically gets temporary power, water and a land line. Internet access just isn't available for construction sites and EVDO access is also hard to get. I'd also have doubts that job supervisors could handle a laptop and internet acces.

      So the only way to communicate with these sites are with a land line. Getting faxes from them are the only reason I keep a land line.

    4. Re:Faxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fax machines are SOO 90's. I can't believe they are still around.

      Correction: Fax machines are SOO 1890's. I can't believe they are still around.

    5. Re:Faxes? by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Do you know any of these internet companies? I've looked around a few times, but I wasn't suer what was good or what wasn't. I don't often have a need for faxes, but I would like to pay a couple of bucks every now and then to make a fax online.

    6. Re:Faxes? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Skype Codec
      It was the first hit on google for "skype codec"

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  40. Tried it and it works great by damonlab · · Score: 1

    I am on a shared cell phone plan and was looking for a way to make cheap calls online. Can't beat free. Tried the free SkypeOut and it works great. I plan on using the flavor out of this until year end.

  41. How good is skype ? by ravee · · Score: 1

    I have heard that making calls through ones computer, one has to put up with reduced clarity and unnecessary noise. I am curious how good skype is w.r.t making calls using a normal phone. Does it suffer from low clarity and noise interference ?

    --
    Linux Help
    for all things on Linux
  42. Some Hidden Benefits by JackRazz · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've been using Skype for a couple of months with a mic/headset combo and it has been surprisingly good. One of the benefits of Skype is that you can make conference calls. This is something I've never done at home with a landline. I had $9 Skype-Out left and don't know how I'm gonna use it up now(-:

  43. UK by Viperlin · · Score: 0

    doesnt work with UK land lines..........
    would of been nice to mention that, retards

  44. Works great, but -- XP SP2 patch required by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just installed it and completed an hour long phone call to a landline. I used the cheap out-of-the-box microphone that came with my Dell, and my computer speakers (not headphones), just like a speakerphone.

    Worked beautifully. Neither I nor my friend had any problem hearing, and it didn't sound like a speaker phone all -- none of those typical speakerphone "click on/click off" noises at all. We could even both tallk at the same time, with both of us more-or-less audible. It was just about as if my friend was in the same room as me. (Some of the credit is probably due to my soundcard.)

    I did have a major CPU utilization problem with Skype until I uninstalled McAfee's firewall, which made the audio terrible. McAfee had long been disabled in favor of (the free, better, not reliant on IE and Active-X) Kerio, but I hadn't gotten around to removing it entirely. Once removed, no problem with Skype at all.

    Also, as I have Windows XP SP2, it was necessary to install this TCPIP.sys patch to get around Microsoft's "helpfulness".

  45. For those having problems... by Yaztromo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was able to test the free SkypeOut by calling my home phone from my PowerBook, but not without some difficulty. At first it wouldn't dial the number at all -- apparently you need to use a bit of a special incantation to get it to dial.

    On my first attempt, I tried to do a ten digit dial (xxx-xxx-xxxx), but it wouldn't let me dial out. So I next tried adding a 1 in front of the number (1-xxx-xxx-xxxx), but again, no-go.

    The trick? You must put a plus sign ('+') in front of the 1 (that is, dial "+1-xxx-xxx-xxxx"). Then it works just fine. But otherwise, it doesn't work at all -- the call button will be completely disabled.

    I wonder however if this won't be ripe for abuse. All Skype calls show up as being from 000-012-3456, and I just know there are some asshats out there who are going to start using this for obscene phone calls, or other negative abuses of the system.

    Anyhow, if you can't get your version of Skype to work, try it with the + symbol in front of the 1. On the latest Mac version at least, this is the only way it will work correctly.

    Yaz.

    1. Re:For those having problems... by mh101 · · Score: 1

      I was able to test the free SkypeOut by calling my home phone from my PowerBook, but not without some difficulty. At first it wouldn't dial the number at all -- apparently you need to use a bit of a special incantation to get it to dial.

      The trick? You must put a plus sign ('+') in front of the 1 (that is, dial "+1-xxx-xxx-xxxx")


      This is pretty well documented. Go to the SkypeOut page at skype.com, and it's there in the How to get calling link. Or in the Skype Dashboard widget mentioned on the OSX version's download page. Or in the FAQ link on the Help menu.

      I agree though it should be right out in the open where everyone will see it. I wonder why the + is needed though... Perhaps regular Skype user IDs can begin with a number, so they needed some way to differentiate phone numbers from numeric user IDs?

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    2. Re:For those having problems... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      This is pretty well documented.

      Yes -- I discovered it when I went to Skype's SkypeOut information page, although admittedly at first I overlooked it. Let's face it -- many people are used to seeing the + sign in phone numbers when they are written to denote the country code part, but you never actually dial the plus sign, just the digits. So when I first saw it, my first inclination was to dial the number as 1-xxx-xxx-xxxx, without the plus.

      As well, I would imagine for many people like myself who have experience with Skype, but not with SkypeOut, when you hear about such a new service and want to try it out, you're going to input the phone number and press the dial button. I'd be interested to hear what technical reasons Skype has for forcing the use of the plus sign at the beginning of the phone numbers -- it does seem superfluous.

      Yaz.

    3. Re:For those having problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's face it -- many people are used to seeing the + sign in phone numbers when they are written to denote the country code part, but you never actually dial the plus sign, just the digits.

      Here in europe, we DO dial the + when dialing from cell phones. Land line phones don't have a + key, and need "00" or other combination, depending on country (some have 009 or 09), but from a cell phone it's always a +, no matter if you're in a place that uses 00 or 09.

      E.g. if I want to call someone in the UK, I dial "+44...". I have entered all numbers in my phone book with the +xx part, that way it will work even if I'm travelling to another country. Local calls are still charged as local even with the +xx part.

    4. Re:For those having problems... by Pretor · · Score: 1

      The initial + is a standard of the GSM network. It is automatically translated to the international number prefix.

      So if you store all your phone numbers on your GSM phone with +, then you can call all your contacts in all contries on the planet, without worrying about what the international dailout code is. An US phone number should be stored like "+1 555 867 5309". If your in the US then +1 is "dropped".

    5. Re:For those having problems... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I'd be interested to hear what technical reasons Skype has for forcing the use of the plus sign at the beginning of the phone numbers -- it does seem superfluous.

      1. To disambiguate from numeric Skype IDs.

      2. For years the plus notation has been the correct way to write phone numbers. When you store a number on your cell phone, you use a plus sign, right? Else you won't be able to dial it when you go to another country where the dialing sequences are different. Come to think of it, maybe this is a 21st century shibboleth that distinguishes US-centric folks from the others.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    6. Re:For those having problems... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      For years the plus notation has been the correct way to write phone numbers. When you store a number on your cell phone, you use a plus sign, right? Else you won't be able to dial it when you go to another country where the dialing sequences are different. Come to think of it, maybe this is a 21st century shibboleth that distinguishes US-centric folks from the others.
      1. I have never added a + to any phone numbers in my cell phone, and yet it has always worked, and
      2. I am Canadian, and live in Canada. I am not an American, and am not US-centric.

      Perhaps the shibboleth (and thanks for the new word for my vocabulary, by the way) lies between those who assume that everything that isn't European must be American, and those who know there are other countries in this world that belong to neither?

      Your first explaination was better, although I would then question why Skype would permit user IDs that could be confused with telephone numbers in the first place.

      Yaz.

    7. Re:For those having problems... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I have never added a + to any phone numbers in my cell phone, and yet it has always worked, and I am Canadian, and live in Canada. I am not an American, and am not US-centric.

      The dial plans in the US and Canada are identical, hence "Else you won't be able to dial it when you go to another country where the dialing sequences are different". Your dial plan was developed by Bell, whose center of gravity was solidly placed in the USA.

      Perhaps the shibboleth (and thanks for the new word for my vocabulary, by the way) lies between those who assume that everything that isn't European must be American, and those who know there are other countries in this world that belong to neither?

      Silly me. I'm in Malaysia, but until you opened my eyes I always thought it was either the USA or Europe.

      P.S. All snarking aside, shibboleth is a great word! Glad you like it.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    8. Re:For those having problems... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      Here in europe, we DO dial the + when dialing from cell phones.

      Fair enough, but Skype's free SkypeOut service is only being offered in the US and Canada, where we don't dial a plus sign. Indeed, traditionally it isn't even used in writing North American telephone numbers.

      My original point being that it is non-obvious to the people this service is targeted at, and may explain why some people are claiming to have problems using the free service. If they are trying to dial the number as they normally would (depending on their service, that could be via a 7-digit, 10-digit, or 11-digit number), it simply won't work.

      Yaz

    9. Re:For those having problems... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      The dial plans in the US and Canada are identical, hence "Else you won't be able to dial it when you go to another country where the dialing sequences are different". Your dial plan was developed by Bell, whose center of gravity was solidly placed in the USA.

      Fair enough, although the centre of gravity remark is debatable (as the first long distance call was in fact made between Brantford and Paris, Ontario, Canada, by Mr. Bell himself). Regardless, the US and Canada has long had a very highly integrated telephone system.

      You do have to realize, however, that I'm in a region of the globe where I can travel a thousand kilometres in any direction and reach only two countries: Canada and the US. I can fly a direct span and remain in Canada in a distance that would cross a dozen countries in most other areas of the world. So getting outside of North America is a fairly infrequent endevour here.

      And assuming I am outside of North America, these days I'd be much more likely to call home from my Vonage Softphone, which has a North American area code attached to it and allows me 500 minutes of calling to any POTS line in North America per month. Perhaps not quite as convenient as a cell phone in some regards, but then again I'm not the type of person who has their ear welded to their telephone anyhow -- for myself, making a phone call is an infrequent event anyhow.

      When you consider that this Skype service is targeted specifically towards people in the US and Canada, however, it would seem reasonable that people within these two countries who want to try the service out are going to assume the dial plan in use within those two countries, and aren't going to need to follow dialing rules used outside this area (which they may not know about in the first place).

      As for "shibboleth", I was happy to find that the Oxford American Dictionary built into Mac OS X does indeed have an entry for it. Good show!

      Yaz.

    10. Re:For those having problems... by SmilingBoy · · Score: 1

      It is possible with Skype to call other countries. How would they know that they should call the US if you don't specify it? Skype is not an American company. And telephone numbers should always be stored with a + in front of it.

    11. Re:For those having problems... by Yaztromo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How would they know that they should call the US if you don't specify it?

      I'm not arguing that the country code shound't be required. That just makes sense. It's the plus symbol that is extraneous.

      And telephone numbers should always be stored with a + in front of it.

      Why? I've survived for several decades without doing this. Why has it suddenly become a requirement?

      Yaz.

    12. Re:For those having problems... by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

      Skype have addressed this in the Beta of 2.5 - by adding a really easy to use dialing wizard/dialpad thing. It does a few things,

      1) It automatically detects what country you are in and pre-populates all calls with that dialing code - unless you override it yourself
      2) It provides a drop-down list of every country, their flag and international dialing code on the dialpad to help you dial properly.

      So looks like they've addressed this problem - and hopefully 2.5 will come out of Beta quite soon and everyone else can benefit from this easy international dialing thing. For us in Europe, where Skype is based, we are so used to international dialing it probably didn't occur to them that not everyone else was...

  46. What about the money already on my account? by mh101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what happens with the money that's already on my SkypeOut account? My current balance is only valid until Sept. 29, which is well before the Dec. 31 end of this offer.

    From their Terms Of Service page: "A credit balance for Skype Credit expires 180 days after the last chargeable use of the Skype Credit. Credit balances that are not used within the said 180 day period will be lost."(emphasis mine) I assume that means that free calls don't count as "chargable use" so even if I place SkypeOut calls every day for the next few months my money would still disappear at the end of September?

    If that's the case, looks like I'll be submitting a refund request. Don't misunderstand me - I'm definitely not complaining about free service, but if I end up losing all my current balance then it's not free.

    Now that I think about it, I wonder how many people will be burned by this and all these 'unused' balances will go straight into Skype's coffers.

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    1. Re:What about the money already on my account? by Patrix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Make a non-US/Canada call once every 6 months and you'll be fine.

    2. Re:What about the money already on my account? by OneInEveryCrowd · · Score: 1

      He could try sending sms messages to foreign countries using the beta also. The rates to some countries are lower than rates to the usa.

    3. Re:What about the money already on my account? by inkdesign · · Score: 1

      You've lost nothing, so why would you expect a refund? Moreover, as someone already paying for the service, you just gained whatever money you intended to add to the skype account between now and 2007.

      You should really be sending a thank-you note. :0]

    4. Re:What about the money already on my account? by fizzup · · Score: 1

      One international number that you can call is the BT Speaking Clock at +44 0871 789 3642. This is an automated service.

    5. Re:What about the money already on my account? by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      Skype have already answered this - when you make any SkypeOut call, paid or free, the 180-day counter will reset.

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  47. It depends on alot of different things.... by OneInEveryCrowd · · Score: 1

    Skype can have better or worse voice quality depending on a number of factors, usually the quality of the internet connection on both ends. When everything is working well, which is very often for me, the sound quality can be ALOT better than POTS.

    You might want to just try it to see if it works well for you.

    One bit of bad news for you, looking at your web page, is that the linux skype client is an old version that doesnt include video. For many people, myself included, the linux client doesnt work as well as the windows client.

  48. ENID - ENUM by Abstract · · Score: 2, Informative

    That system is not called ENID , but ENUM.

    "In short, a server with ENUM support will lookup a dialled telephone number in DNS to see if there's alternate ways to set up the call instead of just calling out on the PSTN telephone line. ENUM may contain a reference to a SIP URL, a telephone number to dial, a web page or an e-mail address. "

  49. Dialpad.com by crossmr · · Score: 1

    They did this a few years ago. I can remember using their service to call someone in the US and it worked good even then. On Dial-up no less. Its nice that this is "big news" now that everyone is on the bandwagon. I love the whole "free pc to pc calls" marketing crap. Yeah thanks, Instant messengers have been doing that for years, you're not doing anything ground breaking.

  50. Great! Skype never accepted my CC before... by WoTG · · Score: 1

    Great! I've wanted to use SkypeOut for quite a while. However, I just couldn't get their website to take my credit card. (Or maybe my CC company was auto rejecting the request...) Anyway, it wasn't worth the effort to figure out what was wrong just to save the extra $.01/min (vs. a calling card) on North American long distance (which I was most interested in)...

  51. since slashdot is an american website... by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 0

    ... you really just wasted your time by logging out.

    --
    for a minute there, i lost myself...
  52. One step further.. by nephridium · · Score: 1
    Yea the non-Skype VoIP system is great. With SIPphones and the mentioned websites we have the technology to make free/cheap phone calls to anywhere.

    One step further would be to extend (free) wireless LAN coverage and put WLAN adapters and VoIP software into cell phones - voila: free cell phone airtime! Then we could also call from anywhere. (Calling people would still be expensive in non-WLAN areas though and obviously impossible in places that don't offer cell phone coverage either.)

    There are a few problems I see though.. 1. Skype is the one VoIP company with all the bells and whistles and might very well bury the other services, in this world the power of marketing is tremendous; 2. the other VoIP providers will want to make some more money as well eventually - I can't see how they would run they free services forever; 3. same goes for the open WLAN access points: some access points, e.g. in hotels require you to register and pay a fee for use; if the (Municipality) government doesn't subsidize it many with no direct gain from it will close their access points for public use.

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    1. Re:One step further.. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      One step further would be to extend (free) wireless LAN coverage and put WLAN adapters and VoIP software into cell phones - voila: free cell phone airtime!

      Yawn, have you been under a rock for a year or two? ;-) Cellphones with WiFi and Skype are old news, I've personally had one for 18 months.

      What is needed to "make it work" is the equivalent of push-email, but for VoIP. You can't keep a mobile device turned on an listening all day without tying it to the wall with a power cable.

  53. How to get it free? by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    I have Skype but I can't seem to figure out how to use SkypeOut for free. What do I need to do to activate this feature?

    Btw, I'm not in the U.S. right now. Could this be the reason? Perhaps Skype is auto-detecting me as not being in the states so it's not letting me have it for free?

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
    1. Re:How to get it free? by Bungopolis · · Score: 1

      Yes - the offer is only valid if you are inside the United States or Canada and are calling the United States or Canada.

    2. Re:How to get it free? by rSelrahc · · Score: 1

      Well... I'm in Canada and I tried calling Canada last night (same town even!) and it did not work... Maybe there are still some glitches...

  54. Gizmo by crache · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use Gizmo. They may not use an opensource client, but they do use OPEN PROTOCOLS (skype...) Their linux support has alsa been much better for me. Oh, look at that freudian slip! Yes, ALSA actually works without glaring issues. I'm even using it with an external usb microphone! They may not be offering free callout, but for 10$ you get 1000minutes that will not expire for two years. Those same minutes can be used anywhere in the world for the standard rates.

    Now, sorry that sounds like an advertisement, but a slashdot article on skype a little while back had me interested in this area, though I knew as soon as I saw skype that it wasn't for me. There is another provider that uses an open client as well, and had the same rates as Gizmo, but I cannot remember them from the top of my head.

    Gizmo Project Anyone have links for other "open" providers. I really think they would compliment this article quite well.

    1. Re:Gizmo by KernelNeo · · Score: 1
  55. I can answer that... by PatMcKinnion · · Score: 1

    Right now here in Qatar, the local ISP / Telco monopoly, QTel, is playing cames with Vonage and other hardware & software based VoIP systems.

    However, Skype seems able to get around their blocks. (They've blocked partial access to the Skype website, but they can't seem to block the service.

    As a result, I use Skype more and more to call home and my daughter. it's more reliable than Vonage seems to be.

    --
    "On the Internet, no one knows you're a minifig....."
  56. In any case... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
    ... I don't know how this works for those of you in the US, but here in Australia, if you want a DSL connection, you are pretty much required to maintain (i.e. pay rental for) a land-line, whether you use it for calls or not.

    Having said that, a friend of mine let his line rental lapse some months ago, and his ADSL connection hasn't been unplugged yet, so maybe it's worth a go... ;-)

  57. WTF?!?! by HamOpMW · · Score: 1, Informative

    That is odd. My ip starts with 71, for the first octet and I have the same problem. I thought maybe Linux only had the problem, then I tested it. So I guess I'll have to war drive to get a "good" Skype ip? THIS SUCKS!!!

  58. Only for US and Canada by Knutsi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems this is only for the US and Canada. Maybe Slashdot needs to orient it's writing more to its global audience? (:

    On a side note, VOIP (Skype) and Ryanair (low cost airline in Europe) is the very reason me (in Norway) and my girl (in Portugal) manages to keep together even tho the distance is enormous. Being able to go to Portgal for the price of an expensive bus ticket + almost free comunications = truly united Europe.

  59. Re:ENID - ENUM - Yes, you're right. by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    Forgive me limited memory at the hour I wrote the post.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  60. Solution: Get the beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I couldn't get free calls either (all the ip's I get from Verizon start w/ 7), but when I downloaded the beta it worked just fine.

  61. Only free if you have an Intel processor? by cepler · · Score: 1

    Weren't these the morons that limited their binary to allow the conferencing features to work on Intel platforms even though the AMD platforms could handle the load just fine? I wonder if my AMD X2 proc will be able to handle these calls! *sniff*

    1. Re:Only free if you have an Intel processor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a case of expanding normal 5 way conferencing to 10 way conferencing for Intel users. I believe it will be expande to 10 participants for the equivalent AMD processors too.

  62. Are they creating more supernodes? by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

    SkyPE has a slight P2P ability in it. Those of you with a good processor/machine the SKYPE client will go into "Supernode" mode. This allows people to route thier calls through your bandwidth.

    This is one of the reasons I don't leave skype running all the time.

  63. Try OneSuite. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    BigZoo folded, but OneSuite.com is still doing well.

    1. Re:Try OneSuite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the link. Looks like they're quite a bit cheaper than BigZoo was, but they're still more expensive than Skype. Of course, not being tied to your computer to make a phone call can be a big bonus, but these days I always have a decent internet connection when I want to make my calls. I'm also making them much less frequently; the best way to cut down on your international calling expenses is to marry the girl you're having to call all the time, does wonders. :-)

  64. Hogwash by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And you think it is less secure than your home phone?

    I can tap your home phone remotely with 10 dollars of equpment from Radio Shack.

    Even if the data is totally unencrypted, it is orders of magnitude harder to tap someone's internet connection than their phone connection. Anyone can splice in a twisted pair to recieve all your incoming calls and attach a small RF transmitter with a few miles range, and odds are great that you would never even notice it, or the jack box on the side of your house. It is much much more difficult to tap DSL or cable, decode the call, can transmit that. You'd need a large amount of kit by the house, something that would get noticed easily.

    At least with Internet phones the number of people who can reasonably tap in is a bit more restricted (people working at any of th einfrastructure point sbetween your house and theirs). With the PTSSN it's basicall a free for all - anyone can tap in at any point in the line from the wall of your house to the pole - and all they need is a $2.99 handset.

    1. Re:Hogwash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but phone tapping is illegal whereas VOIP listening is not.

  65. Canadian Numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try Unlimitel.ca - they provide numbers in some Canadian cities for C2.50/month plus 1.1 cents / minute. Quality is amazing. Service is excellent. No, I don't work for them. Just trying to help.

  66. Europe by FonkiE · · Score: 1

    (rant)
    I have very bad experiences with SkypeOut. People tell me all the time they don't understand me etc. If the service has the same quality in the US giving it for free is still too expensive ;)

    I also don't like the digital jitter of a normal Skype connection. It seems I'm used to analog hissing too much ;)

    BTW: I'm on a 2mbit up/down leased line... so this should be not the problem. And I think I never got a mail back from CS.
    (/rant)

  67. and how are they paying for it? by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    So how is Skype paying the bill for all this? Don't they have to pay a flat fee to the phone companies per call at least to route the call to the local number? You would think they'd put even a really high limit on this.

    1. Re:and how are they paying for it? by olegm · · Score: 1

      Their terms of service say that after 180 days of NO CHARGES, you lose any balance on your skype account. So if someone has been using skype for occasional short local long distance calls, they will lose their entire balance in six months. If they are making a 10 minute call every week to mom/dad, then it SHOULD take 60 weeks to use up a $10 deposit (they give a bonus for paypal deposits). If all of those calls suddenly are free, and you make no international calls, then, your $10 only lasts until december 31.

      You lose $4-$5 of balance that would have been available on 01/01/2007.

      --
      Mac os X, Beautiful, elegant, Unix. Need I say more?
  68. Windoze download == sipdiscount is useless by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    I just visited sipdiscount.com.

    Alas, no joy. Clicking on the register link leads to a windows download. There appears to be no way to even register without downloading some crappy windows program. As I run GNU/Linux and Mac OS X, this makes this a complete nonstarter.

    If they adhered to standards at all, and let you sign up through an HTML interface and configure your SIP gateway/router yourself (as you've described above) it would be interesting. However, since I can't even sign up for the service without buying and polluting my machine with Microsoft Spyware(tm)/Microsoft Virus Fractory(tm), the service is regrettably less than useless.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  69. This is very useful by jimmyfergus · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Wow, you get your cellphone for free!? That's amazing.

    Most of the rest of us have to pay a high monthly fee, or alternatively, do what I do - use prepaid, so I pay $100 a year for my cellphone (still a lot more than free, but it's the best I can get), which gives me over 1000 minutes. 100 minutes a month is more than I need, because I use Skype for my longer "chat" calls to people in the US and abroad.

    So, for those of us who can't get free cellphones, Skype already helped make telephony very cheap, and has now made it even cheaper.

    On the downside, I use T-Mobile for my prepaid, because it's one of the better prepaid deals, but while its coverage is great where I spend 99% of my time, I usually lose it when I go on a trip. On the upside, when I go to the rest of the world, I just plug in a GSM SIM card and have a local cellphone for very little money.

  70. No "Funny" comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My search for "funny)" came up with no hits. All these comments are worthless :).

  71. Skype by certel · · Score: 1

    Great move on Skype's part in trying to increase market share... Wait... Don't they already own that market?

  72. Crap by denjin · · Score: 1

    Oops, interesting typo I made. They go there to feed the bears. I suppose if more people went there to feel them, they'd indirectly feed them at least.

    1. Re:Crap by Cheapy · · Score: 1

      Are you hiding something from us?

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
  73. Not necessarily by slyborg · · Score: 1

    People like lower cost. As more and more people get VoIP numbers/use IM systems the necessity of going to the legacy POTS network declines. Once this reaches a critical mass (probably about 50% of the population), the telcos will suddenly be all about openness, because their legacy numbering system will begin to decline rapidly in value.

    This is one reason all of the telcos are now about moving into broadband service. They aren't stupid, they see this coming. They are just milking the revenue cow while they can.

  74. They are also in the game business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With their game, Duke Nukem Forever

  75. Wow, I'm surprised by all the negative comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to admit I'm surprised by all the negative comments by people who have had bad experiences. I've been using Skype for quite a while now and honestly I thought just about everybody who had a PC and had to talk internationally used it. I usually summarize it (to friends who don't use it yet) as having better-than-phone quality when calling computer to computer, it's completely free, and anybody can set it up and use it--even it's your dad and he's behind a firewall you made him buy. For some time my wife and I were 6 timezones apart but we'd call every weekend morning and just leave the line open for 2-3 hours while I made and ate breakfast and did misc. things around the house; we'd say something every now and again but being able to have an open connection like that made the distance bearable.

    Every once in a while I'll get a bad connection (either computer to computer or using SkypeOut) but 99% of the time it's great; even with the bad connection a 2nd call almost always clears the problem. Even the video calling just plain works and works well (my son's grandparents love it because we currently live 12 timezones away from them and they miss seeing him!).

  76. Re: Skype is now American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > What a fucktard. And you got +5 insightful. Skype is a Scandinavian company, but I guess that won't stop people like you from their american bashing.

    Skype was based in Luxembourg (NOT SCANDINAVIA) and is now OWNED by EBAY an AMERICAN company. Get your f**ktard straight, that's why you get -15 insightful.

  77. Will SkypeFree KO Vonage IPO? by 2centplain · · Score: 1
    The timing with the Vonage IPO is not a coincidence. http://gigaom.com/2006/05/16/will-skype-free-ko-vo nage-ipo/
    Will SkypeFree KO Vonage IPO?
    By Andy Kessler
    This is a classic high stakes Wall Street sucker punch.

    The buzz on the Street is that the Vonage IPO is on the rocks. They HAVE to raise money or they are in a world of hurt. Their investors don't want to put another penny in and the company seems to still be bleeding cash, $75 million in the first quarter of 2006. Geez, Vonage is begging customers to buy 20% of the deal - not a great sign.

    Ebay knows this, why not toy with the mouse before you kill it. What better way to do away with the Vonage IPO and raise their cost of capital then scare investors even more. Every prospective buyer on this deal asking the same questions: what about pricing, why will anyone pay a flat fee per month when skype connects in the US for 2 cents a minute. $25 per month to Vonage is the equivalent of 1250 minutes.

    At Skypeout = zero, its infinite minutes. The value of what Vonage provides has just gone from $25 per month to somewhere close to $0, goose egg, nada. Tough to get a return on equity with those kind of numbers.

    F-ing brilliant. I'd like to shake the hands of the person that thought this out. Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, and UBS now have to work a lot harder to sell this deal. Boo-hoo.
    ...

  78. Dear Mr. Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of my systems are AMD or VIA based. It would seem you, and your partner Intel, don't believe these x86 processors can support your application's features well. Thusly, I shall take your word for it and avoid using your products on any of my machines.

    Thank You, and have a pleasant partnership.

  79. off topic by tim_abell · · Score: 1

    Don't bollocks normally come in a bag?

    --
    Respect copyright - the GPL relies on it.
    1. Re:off topic by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      And they're not very stable!

  80. That cells by wytcld · · Score: 1

    By US law any cell phone can dial 911 - even if it's not paid up. But a disconnected land line is ... disconnected.

    There are groups that distribute old cell phones to people who may need to make emergency calls but can't afford to pay for the capability.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  81. Great Point. by bogie · · Score: 1

    10 years ago this would have been something. Now, Meh.

    Last night I saw this and tried out Skype for the first time. I called my wife and said "Isn't this cool, free phone calls from my computer to any landline!". Her response? "We already have unlimited local and long distance with our landline, why would we use that?". I think we also have Free calling to anyone with a Verizon cell phone.

    So I guess this is a cool way to maybe not have your kid tie up your phone but beyond that it doesn't seem very useful. Personally I think the whole thing is technically cool but again not so useful for most.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  82. Also try BroadVoice.com by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Exactly. I did that too. Also try BroadVoice.com. 35 countries, no per minute charge.

    However, OneSuite is indispensable. Often the voice quality is much better than VOIP calls.

  83. Broadvoice by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Trying to be helpful -- You should look at my post below: BroadVoice.com.

  84. Routing Non-US IPs by chiao · · Score: 1

    I wonder how easy would it be to route non-US IPs to get around Skype's IP filtering.

  85. and it's still completely useless... by fusion9290991 · · Score: 1

    ...to those of us who are stuck using dial-up :)

    --
    remember to loot and pillage before you burn!
  86. No + on DTMF keypads by Jeff+Archambeault · · Score: 1

    'nuff said

    --

    Plus ca change, plus c'est les memes choses.