Slashdot Mirror


Wal-Mart's $200 Linux PC Sells Out

hankmt writes "About a week ago Wal-Mart began selling a $200 Linux machine running on a 1.5 ghz VIA C7 processor and 512 MB of RAM. While the specs are useless for Vista, it works blazingly fast on Ubuntu with the Enlightenment Window Manager. The machine is now officially sold out of their online warehouses (it may still be available in some stores). And the product sales page at wal-mart.com is full of glowing reviews from new and old Linux users alike."

619 comments

  1. What's that in bogomips by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Funny

    How many bogomips are we talking here...

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:What's that in bogomips by Josh+Booth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of $200 Wal-Mart PCs...

      Oh, I guess someone did.

    2. Re:What's that in bogomips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, even though nobody got it, that's freakin hillarious!!

    3. Re:What's that in bogomips by renegadesx · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should know the answer is 42!

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    4. Re:What's that in bogomips by c7fanboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's nice to see a non-Intel / non-AMD x86... Way to go VIA / Centaur Technology!

    5. Re:What's that in bogomips by Whiteox · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    6. Re:What's that in bogomips by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Informative

      Approximately 11.1 [link to wikipedia deleted]

      No, that's the index. But thinks for the link.

      Looks like it would be about 3,000 bogomips. Not cutting edge, but not too shabby either.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    7. Re:What's that in bogomips by dwater · · Score: 1

      I am 42 (as of Sunday just gone), so *I AM THE ANSWER*, but only for the next year (well, just under a year, but who's counting?).

      --
      Max.
    8. Re:What's that in bogomips by captainwisdom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Vote Kucinich and drive them even nuttier!!!

    9. Re:What's that in bogomips by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      a bit offtopic but... theres a Beowulf Movie

    10. Re:What's that in bogomips by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      FYI, XP doesn't stand for "eXPerience". It's just an emoticon. -- SharpFang (651121)

      I thought your sig was part of the comment until I hit "reply" it's so on-topic. IINM XP stands for "eXtra Pain". Every generation of Windows is a worse experience for the user. I've had XP installed for a couple of years and still can't find where they moved half the shit I knew where was in 98.

      From the summary: "While the specs are useless for Vista, it works blazingly fast on Ubuntu". That is exactly what is wrong with Vista (besides the "moving stuff around thing"). How is making my computer slower considered an "upgrade"?

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    11. Re:What's that in bogomips by nschubach · · Score: 3, Funny

      You didn't know that the Beowulf project was named after the movie?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    12. Re:What's that in bogomips by funfail · · Score: 2, Funny

      so *I AM THE ANSWER*
      Then who is the question?
    13. Re:What's that in bogomips by neomunk · · Score: 1

      Or we could elect Kucinich VS Paul in the national election...

      I think the punditry's(sp?) collective heads would explode, similar to the KKK guy in that episode of Chapelle's show during the 'black white supremacist' skit. Can you imagine Tim Russert's or Lou Dobbs' headless body occupying those comfortable chairs after heading the news? Rush Limbaugh's lie factory all over his little switchboard? (heh, slurp up the juice for a quick high, be careful though, narcotics are dangerous) Hell, even Jon Stewart and Bill Maher would be left bleeding from the neck.

      We'd make it a holiday afterwards, I think. The Day the World Stopped Spinning, or something. No, that would be the movie title.

      Ahhh, good times, good times... :-D

    14. Re:What's that in bogomips by wixardy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then who is the question?

      He's on first.
    15. Re:What's that in bogomips by Mister+Kay · · Score: 0, Informative

      I'm pretty sure it's named after the epic poem that's been around for almost 2000 years.... which the movie is based on.

    16. Re:What's that in bogomips by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      No I guess not. Wonder why Walmart didn't tell us for it is the holy grail of information for us ye commoners!

    17. Re:What's that in bogomips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      whoooooosh!

    18. Re:What's that in bogomips by lightsaber777 · · Score: 1

      Can't be. This is the United States, all you need to know is pumped into your brain via movies and television. Reading? Poetry? Eh, too much work.

    19. Re:What's that in bogomips by jo42 · · Score: 1

      ...or eXtra Problems...

    20. Re:What's that in bogomips by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine Tim Russert's or Lou Dobbs' headless body occupying those comfortable chairs after heading the news? Rush Limbaugh's lie factory all over his little switchboard? (heh, slurp up the juice for a quick high, be careful though, narcotics are dangerous)

      You don't have to wait for Rush' head to explode. He keeps half his brain tied behind his back. B-)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    21. Re:What's that in bogomips by gold23 · · Score: 1

      Vic Sage.

      --
      Trust not a man who's rich in flax / His morals may be sadly lax
  2. It's been like this by Eddi3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It sold out much faster then this; It's been out of stock for at least 2 days.

    1. Re:It's been like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And certainly no Walmarts!

    2. Re:It's been like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Manager at a local Wall Mart said he had 80 to go on sale at 8:00AM and they were all sold at 8:01. People began lining up at 6 in the morning, and they gave slips to the first 80 in line. I went in at 5PM and people were still trying to buy them.

    3. Re:It's been like this by duduhead · · Score: 1

      Is that 'faster then this' as in greater then or less then? Must be a programmer.

    4. Re:It's been like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Didn't Linux sell out sometime around the Novell/MS deal?

    5. Re:It's been like this by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

      It's been out of stock for at least 2 days Looks like 4 days (about halfway down the page 4 day old post noting they're sold out).
      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    6. Re:It's been like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the story first hit, I've seen the online site switch back and forth between sold out and in stock every now and then, but this time it looks like it's staying that way.

    7. Re:It's been like this by jo42 · · Score: 1

      I really do not get why people are buying these machines...

      I can got to a local PC shop and by a shiny refurbished Compaq Evo small form factor desktop with a 3GHz P4, 80GB hard drive, 512MB RAM, DVD-ROM/CD-R with a Windows XP license sticker on it for $189. These puppies even have a low profile NVIDIA AGP video card in them (none of this integrated video p00p).

  3. Australia sucks by jaxtherat · · Score: 1

    And we still don't even have Ubuntu Dells, let alone retail linux boxes.... :(

    --
    http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    1. Re:Australia sucks by renegadesx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anything bigscale yes, however there are some smaller shops that will do it.

      You'd think Aldi would be doing Ubuntu PC's already ;)

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    2. Re:Australia sucks by Nazlfrag · · Score: 3, Funny

      We also don't have Wal-Mart, so there's a bright side.

    3. Re:Australia sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure we do, K-mart is owned by walmart.

    4. Re:Australia sucks by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I must check out Go-Lo, Base Warehouse and Kmart catalogues. Maybe they've got a $217 machine on for a Xmas special.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    5. Re:Australia sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehehe .... well, I thought having more options was a good thing but I guess not in Australia.

  4. Support??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like an interesting machine for newbie linux users. What kind of software support will a user get?

    1. Re:Support??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Probably the same as a Windows user... None.

    2. Re:Support??? by Cyko_01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's free phone support and a regularly updated app called "Faqly" that contains the latest tech support info for folks stuck offline.

    3. Re:Support??? by Nullav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I could imagine this being more usable for newbies in general, rather than just those unfamiliar with Linux. It certainly sounds a lot better than Windows with its interactive flow charts ('Troubleshooting Wizard').

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    4. Re:Support??? by Excelsior · · Score: 1

      and a regularly updated app called "Faqly"
      I'm betting I'm not the only one who did a double take the first time I read that.

  5. Not to troll, but what do they expect for returns? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Remember, these are typical Walmart customers here. How many of them are going to return these things when that AOL CD they have doesn't work automagically? How many of these people are expected to have DSL or Cable instead of dial-up? How many are going to be returned because they don't have MS Office pre-installed on them?

  6. Useful user reviews - oh wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not quite what you'd think!, 10/31/2007
    By NWAshopper, AR Read all reviews by this reviewer

    Value for price paid: 1 out of 5
    Meets Expectations: 1 out of 5

    Buyers beware! Don't let the low cost of this computer sway your credit card. This computer doesn't have the power to run Windows XP!!! This is a decent buy for the tech smart who are looking for ITX Hardware on the cheap. DO NOT BUY. You will be very dissapointed!

    Overall Rating: 4 out of 5

    Great Value for Money, 11/06/2007
    By CompuShopr Read all reviews by this reviewer

    Value for price paid: 5 out of 5
    Meets Expectations: 5 out of 5

    This is a Linux machine that's capable of XP or Vista. It runs quick, and upgrades easily. Major con is no monitor. Tried XP and Vista and it runs like a champ. Definitely recommend this product.

    1. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by renegadesx · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Im in trouble for slashdotting at work I laughed so loud when I saw "Tried XP and Vista and it runs like a champ"

      Can somebody say "Liar"?

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    2. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This system easily meets the spec to run XP, and also meets the advertised base spec for Vista.

    3. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...and also meets the advertised base spec for Vista."

      Which is like game specs. Sure, it will play but it is no fun.

    4. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      This system easily meets the spec to run XP, and also meets the advertised base spec for Vista. But the base spec is like the minimum spec on a game box. Meaning that the game will run on these spec, but forget about playing it.
      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    5. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not fast enough for XP? I know the C7 isn't the fastest machine, but, I don't buy it. I ran XP on my PII-350 laptop with 300 some MB of ram for years without problem. I only upgraded for the luxury, really. If I'd just put in a flash blocker, I could still be happily browsing Slashdot and doing work on it. I suppose it's possible that a PII-350 could out preform a 1.7 ghz chip of a different architecture, but it dosn't seem likely, could anyone enlighten me here?

    6. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it runs like a champ.
      ...In the Special Olympics.
    7. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      XP has got a lot slower since it was released... Especially installing SP2 takes a big hit, that said i still doubt it would be unusable on a 1.5ghz box...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    8. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by renegadesx · · Score: 2

      OK, I want to know why I got modded flamebait.

      I have tested Vista on a P4 2.8Ghz, 1GB RAM, ATi X1550 and it runs so bad it would make a bunny cry. Its chops along like a dog on that configuration and this guy is expecting us to by that it runs fine on a 1.5Ghz VIA, 512Mb RAM, onboard video and "run like a champ"? You have got to be kidding me.

      I wont deny that XP may run fine on it but there is no way Vista would run well on that configuration. It's just out of the question.

      Look I have no issues with this machine, it looks great and E17 is a great improvment on what was already a great desktop environment. But this guy is obviously lying.

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    9. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It was obviously a typo. What he meant to say was: "It runs like a chimp."

    10. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I ran XP on my PII-350 laptop with 300 some MB of ram for years without problem. I only upgraded for the luxury, really.
      You upgraded to Vista... as a luxury?!

      I think your definition of luxury is different than mine.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    11. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid you're wrong here. The thing that SP2 really kills you on is the memory.

      I have a PII-400 with 384M in the basement, it's running XP SP2. As you would expect, video playback isn't great, and some of the programs are a little slow, but all in all it's usable. All I usually use it for any more is a print server, scanning station and iTunes "server" but it does all of that just fine, and web browsing is OK too.

      By contrast, the much more modern desktop system I have at work (for one specific task, thank god) barely runs with its 256M.

      If this WalMart PC has 512M of memory, it's probably ok for XP.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    12. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I think people really forget how -old- XP is (and what kind of computers were the norm when it came out).

      They also forget that unless you play games (or do video editing, etc), even the crappiest computer can do -everything- they want to do (such as, check email, browse web, play DVDs, type up documents, etc.)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    13. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      I'm running XP on a VIA C3, 512 MB, and a way crappier GPU than this one (some 4 MB shared memory piece of junk). I can watch youtube sort of fluently if I use the 'smaller screen' button for it. DVD is out of the question after I replaced the CPU fan with a northbridge heatsink, but it can handle the TV-card signal on full screen, I just plugged a DVD player into the S-video port.

      I am fully convinced that this PC will run XP like a charm. I wonder when it will be available in the EU, wal-mart recently was renamed into Real,- here in Germany. They sell lindows or linuxOS pcs every now and then, by the way.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    14. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by gerilart · · Score: 1

      This is BS. I saw XP running on Celeron 466MHz with 192MB or ram. I wasn't fast but it was OK. I am typing this on 1GHz Pentium III which is plenty for XP "Not quite what you'd think!, 10/31/2007 By NWAshopper, AR Read all reviews by this reviewer Value for price paid: 1 out of 5 Meets Expectations: 1 out of 5 Buyers beware! Don't let the low cost of this computer sway your credit card. This computer doesn't have the power to run Windows XP!!! This is a decent buy for the tech smart who are looking for ITX Hardware on the cheap. DO NOT BUY. You will be very dissapointed!"

    15. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by IndieKid · · Score: 1

      Vista Home Basic would run fine on that config. When someone says Vista runs like a champ their definition of 'champ' isn't necessarily the same as yours.

    16. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by norminator · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. I tried Vista on my P4 2.6 GHz laptop, which originally had 512MB of RAM, but it ran like a pig, so I bumped it up to 2 GB RAM. Still ran like a pig. And since my 32MB NVidia chip doesn't support the Aero Glass interface, I was left with what was essentially a Vista Home Basic experience. To be honest, I kind of liked some of the updates to Vista, like the search in the Start Menu, and the breadcrumb address bar in Explorer. But it ran terribly.

    17. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Agreed - AMD K6-2 450 / 192MB RAM on an 8GB and a 5GB set of HD's for C:/D:
      VooDoo3 3500 TV AGP video from when I built the machine to run Win98, and the unit still runs XP like a shot. Of course, I don't keep a lot of bloat on it, and I don't use visual stylings.

      Only upgraded when I bought a laptop with a Sempron 1.6GHz/512MB that I bumped up to 1.5GB

      So now the poor AMD K6 gathers dust, but for about 7 years it ran either 98, 2K or XP (for about 2 yrs, 2yrs, and 3 yrs) with no problems.

      I don't know what these rich boys think they've got in their expensive hardware that it is the minimum necessary to run these apps (and my other box is a dualcore, so I've got the nice toys too)

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
    18. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Darth · · Score: 1

      he upgraded his laptop as a luxury. I'm guessing the upgraded laptop still had XP on it.

      There's no way in hell vista would run on a PII-350 with 300MB ram.

      --
      Darth --
      Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    19. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of what he meant, but my initial scan read a little differently, so I decided to run with it and make a little joke. Sorry my intent was unclear.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    20. Re:Useful user reviews - oh wait by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      You can see the bias in those reviews.. NWAshopper is basing its review on if a machine designed to run Ubuntu will run windows xp or vista and rate it poorly when it doesn't..

      All of them are great reviews of the whole product. Not one of them mentioned how well it ran the pre-installed OS.

  7. Walmart + Linux = ... by patio11 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the Slashdot equivalent of strapping buttered toast to the back of a kitten and pushing it off a table. You could power a perpetual motion machine with the flames generated by this combo...

    1. Re:Walmart + Linux = ... by explosivejared · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What about soaking a kitty in gasoline, lighting it on fire, and then letting it free in a field of daisies. Now there are some real flames(literally).

      --
      I got a catholic block.
    2. Re:Walmart + Linux = ... by Duhavid · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you mean "perpetual emotion machine".

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  8. More /. Cognitive Dissonance by goldspider · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wal*Mart = Bad
    Linux = Good

    *whimper*

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by explosivejared · · Score: 1

      Way to use the newest buzzword in a cliche "counterculture" move. Cognitive dissonance has nothing to do with this. It wasn't the choice of slashdot collectively for Wal-mart to drive human rights abuses in there factories, destroy small-time retailers and subsequently communities, nor sell cheap tech crap to make a buck off of the uninformed consumer. Well I guess there is some amount of cognitive dissonance involved. I mean once you realize a corporation is evil at heart... it's kinda hard to look the other way.

      --
      I got a catholic block.
    2. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wal*Mart's badness (and their success) comes from doing everything possible to drive the price down. With a Linux system, they can't pay the developers less than nothing and even they can't affect the price of low-end mass market PC components much. So I'd say you can buy these with a relatively clear conscience.

    3. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by goldspider · · Score: 1

      But is this kind of news good because it's Linux, or bad because it's Wal-Mart?

      In this case I suspect the EEEEEVIIIIL that we all know is Wal-Mart overshadows the good exposure Linux gets from this deal.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    4. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by arth1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's like your mother-in-law driving your new Porsche off a cliff, you mean?

      Seriously, though, you don't have to buy a sub-$200 PC from Wal-Mart if you don't want to.
      At Pricewatch, there's quite a few bring-your-own-OS deals, including Core 2 Duo or athlon 64 x2 systems for ~$200 including shipping.

    5. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by explosivejared · · Score: 1

      I mean spreading linux is great. I just don't think it's such a good idea that people actually make tech purchases at Wal-Mart.

      --
      I got a catholic block.
    6. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Were the computers assembled by illegal aliens?

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by renegadesx · · Score: 3, Funny

      No this is Walmart which obviously means they were assembled by legal chinese citizins working on an annual salary of $2.50, so I would be testing the case for GHB if I got one

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    8. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      Way to use the newest buzzword in a cliche "counterculture" move.

      It's only the newest buzzword if you think Neuromancer is the newest cyberpunk novel.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    9. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You know I love Linux, right?"
      "Of course. I saw the doll you made."
      "Exactly. Lil' Linus. But when I hear that Walmart is selling Linux computers, I worry. Should I be happy because it's Linux? Or should I be scared because Walmart is the epitome of corporate evil?"
      "My default position is Cautious Optimism."
      "What if Krispy Kreme teamed up with someone's asshole to put shit in donuts? Would your position be cautiously optimistic?"
      "Your analogies really are the best."

    10. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Wal*Mart = Bad?

      Why?

      1. They seem to practice less age discrimination than other stores.
      2. They do business with Chinese manufacturers, keeping a certain pressure on their quality control. (Go to Africa, and compare the stuff THEY get from China to the stuff the US gets from China.)
      3. They build stores in places that previously had no retail market at all.

      I'm sure there's more.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    11. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      It's like your mother-in-law driving your new Porsche off a cliff, you mean?

      Both are insured, where's the downside?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    12. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by inviolet · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's more [benefits from Wal-mart]."

      Probably the biggest blessing of all from Wal-mart, is the fact that they function as a collective bargaining agent -- against manufacturers and on behalf of American consumers. They bring enormous price pressure to bear on producers. They are a "virtual union" of the middle and lower classes, and the result has been cheaper everything.

      This may be part of the cause of the recent housing boom. Because housewares are so much cheaper now, many more people can finally fit a house payment into their budget.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    13. Re:More /. Cognitive Dissonance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't the choice of slashdot collectively for Wal-mart to drive human rights abuses in there factories, destroy small-time retailers and subsequently communities, nor sell cheap tech crap to make a buck off of the uninformed consumer.

      Wal-Mart does these things so I don't have to. But seriously, lower prices are a good thing. Would you rather be ripped off by a so called "Mom and Pop" that jacks prices way above what they should be? Wal-Mart doesn't own factories. They do sell cheap tech. But the uninformed consumer *CAN TAKE IT BACK FOR A REFUND* if they don't like it. How many small time retailers (or even big time ones) allow that?

  9. Do they sell em with monitors? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    An 15" LCD monitor will cost you about $200.. so, what, $30 for a keyboard and mouse.. $430 for a computer, not bad.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Do they sell em with monitors? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      $200 for a 15"? Where are you buying your monitors? I just bought a nice 19" flat panel (1280x1024) from NewEgg for $168.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Do they sell em with monitors? by Eddi3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, The computer comes with a keyboard, a mouse, and speakers, and you can get a decent LCD monitor for around $125-150, so more like $325-350 for the bundle. A great deal, IMO.

    3. Re:Do they sell em with monitors? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Silly me, assumed smaller LCD would be cheaper.. 15" is hard to get these days.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Do they sell em with monitors? by pat+mcguire · · Score: 0

      Well, don't mean to offend, but there's a pretty good explanation for that: the fact that it's 1280x1024. I'm no expert, but it seems as if the cost of production would have more to do with resolution than the size - plastic is cheap, parts with strict specifications are not. 1280x1024 isn't anywhere close to what graphics cards are pushing out these days.

    5. Re:Do they sell em with monitors? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      The LCD monitor the typical customer already had is free, and good 17" CRTs are about five or ten bucks at the Salvation Army.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:Do they sell em with monitors? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      The only way to get a cheap 15" is to get a 19" and apply masking tape.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    7. Re:Do they sell em with monitors? by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

      Check out your local thrift store. The ones around here have tons of 17" CRTs for ~$5, and decent ps/2 keyboards for ~$2-$3. Haven't seen any good scrollwheel optical mice, though.

    8. Re:Do they sell em with monitors? by rk · · Score: 1

      As others have said, you practically can't find a 15" monitor in this day and age. 17s and 19s are where the sweet spot is, and a little shopping around and patience can yield you even better deals. I bought a 22" ViewSonic widescreen monitor (1680x1050) from Fry's Online for 200 bucks a couple months ago. It's a nice looking digital/analog monitor with vivid colors and an excellent contrast ratio. I use it on my Windows box for music composition and playing games: mostly World in Conflict and Starcraft. Yes, even the 640x480 resolution looks halfway decent on it.

      I would guess as competition heats up for the holiday season it wouldn't be too hard to find a similar deal in the next few weeks.

  10. Based upon the comments there ... none. by khasim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems the people buying it know that it isn't Windows or they're buying it for friends/family and they'll be providing the support.

    And for home users it's all about knowing someone who can fix it when it breaks. With Windows there's usually some neighbor's kid who "knows computers".

    So don't expect too many returns on this.

    1. Re:Based upon the comments there ... none. by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      With Windows there's usually some neighbor's kid who "knows computers"

      The same kid may also know a certain alphanumeric string that can fix the Linux trouble.

    2. Re:Based upon the comments there ... none. by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 5, Funny

      man?

    3. Re:Based upon the comments there ... none. by Aehgts · · Score: 2, Funny

      $ apropos man|wc -l
      255
      $ apropos woman
      woman: nothing appropriate.

      --
      "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein
    4. Re:Based upon the comments there ... none. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      A key for XP corp?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Based upon the comments there ... none. by Darundal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, actually, it looks like all the people who are buying it online and writing reviews know that it isn't Windows.

    6. Re:Based upon the comments there ... none. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Seems" how? Where are you getting your info? Or are you just running your mouth without facts?

    7. Re:Based upon the comments there ... none. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      With Windows there's usually some neighbor's kid who "knows computers".

      In 98% of my experience, that "neighbor's kid" knows just enough to get into big trouble, and causes more problems that he solves.

      That goes, not just double, but 10X, where hardware is involved. I can't count the number of times I hear about some kid replacing an optical drive in someone's computer, and fries the video, motherboard, etc., because he doesn't know shit about ICs and static electricity.

      Unless it's absolute trash already, don't let "some neighbor's kid" near your computer. Would you trust him to replace/repair the brakes in your car?

      Of course that doesn't go for trivial things like asking how to burn a CD, but the average person has no way of knowing what action is trivial, and what is seriously risky.

      Now, there are a few exceptions to the rule, and many people on /. probably qualified when they were younger (or perhaps still do). However, in that case, a good number probably also know Linux as well (I certainly did). Second, a Linux system is much less likely to have spontaneous problems like a driver that just stops working one day, or viruses, spyware, deleted system files, etc., and that is the vast majority of the every-day problems people experience with Windows, and get some kid to help them with.

      First, a Linux is much less likely to have spontaneous problems.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  11. I ordered one. by bcrowell · · Score: 1

    I ordered one online for my kid. It's supposed to arrive at the local walmart by about Nov. 26. My wife was convinced my brain had been taken over by aliens, since I normally don't like walmart. I was like, "Honey, this is Linux! It's not evil, it's good!"

    Walmart has had other linux PCs for sale online. What was supposed to be different about this one was that it was supposed to be on the shelves in the stores. AFAICT that never actually happened. The local walmart was one of the ones on the list that was supposed to have it for sale, but actually it never showed up in stock. Just out of curiousity, I checked their web site for other stores that might have it: San Francisco, NY, Chicago, etc. None of them had it in stock.

    I hope these machines are good. I used to buy the $200 Fry's Great Quality machines, but Fry's is no longer selling those.

    1. Re:I ordered one. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I hope these machines are good. I used to buy the $200 Fry's Great Quality machines, but Fry's is no longer selling those.

      That's probably because they weren't making any money on them, as I imagine Wal-Mart isn't making on these $200 Linux things.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:I ordered one. by Eddi3 · · Score: 1

      *Walmart* is probably making money on them. I'd imagine it would be *Everex* taking the fall on this one.

    3. Re:I ordered one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was like, "Honey, this is Linux! It's not evil, it's good!"
      I don't understand your simile. In what way were you like that? Are you surrounded by double quotes?
    4. Re:I ordered one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I used to buy the $200 Fry's Great Quality machines, but Fry's is no longer selling those.

      I worked at Fry's in the tech department when they sold those. There's two very big reasons they don't anymore.

      1) That distro of linux they used... no idea what it was called, but it was some Korean piece of complete SHIT. Not even linux users would like it.

      2) Every one we got back, EVERY SINGLE ONE either had Windows XP installed on it by the user or a complaint that Windows wasn't on it and it couldn't run their programs. I've never seen a better argument against "linux for the masses" than seeing the absolute disdain people had for a commercial attempt at packaging linux.
    5. Re:I ordered one. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Informative
      I imagine Wal-Mart isn't making on these $200 Linux things.

      Retail component prices:

      • VIA pc2500 ATX Mainboard & 1.5GHz C7-D CPU Bundle $65
      • 5-Bay 20+4-Pin mATX Case w/250-Watt PS (Beige) $14.99
      • 80gb Seagate hd $49
      • 512 DDRII ram $24
      • Logitech NASCAR Keyboard and Optical Wheel Mouse $7.99
      • Samsung 52x32x52 CDRW & 16x DVD-ROM IDE Drive $21.99
      That makes a total component retail cost of $182.97 if you built one yourself. I'd estimate then that Walmart would get them wholesale for about $160, which would give $40/unit to play with for shop costs/profits
      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    6. Re:I ordered one. by Romwell · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah ! My grandma's been using XP on a $150 GQ PC from fry (no monitor included). Yeah, it was quite slow, but adding a gig of ram made it fly. Does all the intertubes + skype video, and they don't seem to need much more.

    7. Re:I ordered one. by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      That distro of linux they used... no idea what it was called, but it was some Korean piece of complete SHIT. Not even linux users would like it.

      It was called ThizLinux, and it was Chinese. I always just bought the machines and immediately installed some other linux distro on them.

      Every one we got back, EVERY SINGLE ONE either had Windows XP installed on it by the user or a complaint that Windows wasn't on it and it couldn't run their programs

      The documentation that came with them had absolutely no information on ThizLinux. What it had page after page of was information on how to install Windows. I'm sure a significant market for these machines was people who were installing copyright-violating copies of Windows. But just because you found that all the people who returned them were doing that, that doesn't mean everyone who bought one was doing that. I bought five of the things over the years (for family, for my desk at work, ...), and the reason you never got any of them as returns is that they're all still running great with ubuntu on them.

  12. Desktop Linux growth in 2007 by compumike · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the community around me, I've seen a lot of growth in the use of Linux on the desktop just in the last year. But probably the most interesting trend is that I've seen a bunch of new Ubuntu users among the mechanical engineering students, who in general aren't particularly computer-nerdy, and even more amazingly, are actually dependent on Windows-only software for some of their CAD tools (i.e. Solidworks).

    I think the Walmart results might be indicative of a growing trend where people are just about ready to make the leap themselves... particularly when it comes preinstalled like it does here. Another step in the right direction.

    What I'd love to see, though, is how much previous computer experience all of those Walmart reviewers had -- for some, it seems like quite a bit.

    --
    Electronics kits for the digital generation.

    1. Re:Desktop Linux growth in 2007 by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      What I'd love to see, though, is how much previous computer experience all of those Walmart reviewers had -- for some, it seems like quite a bit.

      In my experiences of trying to get people to use Linux instead of Windows (because I'm the nerd who has to fix thair spyware/virus laden machines) I've found that the less you know about Windows, the easier it is to learn Linux.

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:Desktop Linux growth in 2007 by toppavak · · Score: 1

      I think the departure from Windows to Linux you saw in Mechanical Engr students (despite their reliance on Windows-only software such as Solidworks) might have occurred in tandem with the rise in remote desktop services provided by Universities. My school (North Carolina State University) provides and entire Virtual Computing Lab service to its engineering students and I frequently RD in to run MATLAB and Solidworks remotely myself.

  13. But, by bedwards09 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it run Windows?

    1. Re:But, by Eddi3 · · Score: 1

      Yes. If you check the comments, people have installed both XP and Vista (Home Basic, I assume), and they worked great.

    2. Re:But, by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      Throw an extra stick of ram in it (what, $50) and run your windows apps under wine.

    3. Re:But, by Techman83 · · Score: 1

      Actually for an extra $98 you can get vista home basic instead... I've seen Vista Home Basic run poorly on much higher spec'd machines than this, hate to think what it would run like *shudders*

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
      Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    4. Re:But, by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually yes. I have three 1GHz Via machines. Two runs Linux (NFS servers stuffed full of disk drives), one runs ExPee.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    5. Re:But, by calebt3 · · Score: 1
      I decided to reply to this post rather than your grandchild AC (so that you would actually get this message), where you said:

      Posting anonymously is sort of like super stealth technology, I can say anything I want and nobody will ever read it. Pity me, for comments appear to me as if the filter is set at "-1, Raw and Uncut" or whatever it is. So I am reading all 478 comments. No amount of fiddling in Preferences is does anything. It has been like this for several weeks now.
  14. Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle America by reporter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Walmart is not the sort of place where you find geeks, techies, and various assorted dweebs. This store is where America shops and is patronized by people who know little about calculus or physics.

    That a Linux machine is sold out at Walmart suggests that plain folks -- not like you and me -- know and respect Linux. The lesson is that there is a ready market, in middle America, for Linux-based applications. Will software developers heed this lesson?

    For most people, the monster computer (with globs of memory and a gazillion hertz of processor speed) running Windows XP is already more machine than most Americans need. Now, Microsoft will kill off Windows XP in order to sell Vista to us. We will need a super-monster computer to run Vista. This whole process of bloated operating systems (OSes) driving purchases of even more excessive amounts of hardware is a damned waste of money.

    The simple machine that runs Linux is good enough for most people. The number one application in America, after all, is e-mail.

    Software developers should tune into middle America and sell Linux-based applications so that we can put an end to this never-ending cycle of bigger, badder OS needing bigger, badder computer.

  15. lcd monitors are cheaper than you may recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These days $200 would get you a decent 19-20" (probably widescreen) monitor. just a quick example from newegg

  16. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by wizardforce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    how many AOL users bother to change their OS to linux? how many people use the features in MS office that OpenOffice doesn't support? how many would even notice the difference?

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  17. Must resist.... by Itninja · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...urge to support the Wal Mart beast. But Linux is good right? But wait...Wal Mart is not good. Unless, they throw me a open-source bone. Then they're good right? Damn, I hate moral dilemmas. Why can't everything Wal Mart sells, just be something I either do not want or do not need? It's almost as if they are pandering to....hey look! They have for $1.99/dozen!

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Must resist.... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      But wait...Wal Mart is not good. Unless, they throw me a open-source bone. ... [snip] ... Why can't everything Wal Mart sells, just be something I either do not want or do not need? What I find, unequivocally, is that anything WalMart sells is something that I neither want nor need to buy from them.

      Hey, I'm not knocking WalMart for selling an open-source product. But they're not doing it for altruism, "free-as-in" freedom or geek points. They are doing it for money. Spend yours elsewhere and make the world a better place.
      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:Must resist.... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      But they're not doing it for altruism, "free-as-in" freedom or geek points. They are doing it for money. Spend yours elsewhere and make the world a better place.

      Er, exactly which store *is* selling them for alturism, "free-as-in freedom" or geek points, and is *not* doing it for money?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    3. Re:Must resist.... by AresTheImpaler · · Score: 1

      Er, exactly which store *is* selling them for altruism, "free-as-in freedom" or geek points, and is *not* doing it for money?

      Microsoft does everything for altruism, "free-as-in freedom, AND geek ponts.. really.. I swear!

    4. Re:Must resist.... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Er, exactly which store *is* selling them for alturism, "free-as-in freedom" or geek points, and is *not* doing it for money? Fair enough. Clarification: WalMart is widely recognized as an unscrupulous retailer who does the socio-economic equivalent of "strip mining" wherever they take root. The GGP poster was pretending to be caught in a dilemma between supporting WalMart's offering of an open-source product and their unethical business practices. My point is that, as an individual, you simply give your money to some other capitalist who operates in a manner that is less offensive, or hey, maybe even does the world some good.
      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    5. Re:Must resist.... by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      "WalMart is widely recognized as an unscrupulous retailer who does the socio-economic equivalent of "strip mining" wherever they take root."

      Where I live, that's utter bullshit. Wherever a Wal Mart has popped up here, an entire ecosystem of smaller stores springs up around it. It's the ultimate anchor store. There are two super centers within 10 minutes of me, and both were huge boosts to the retail economy. They both have bakeries, haircut shops, auto service centers, jewelry shops, and food markets. And surprise surprise, right next to Wal Mart are shops that sell baked goods, cut hair, fix cars, sell jewelry, etc. I think you get the picture. Rather than coming in and driving out existing shops, the super centers have been huge economic shots in the arm...and if they're so predatory, then why do these other shops thrive right next to them?

      General stores made the same argument against older retailers like Sears and JC Penney, and the argument was just as wrong back then.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    6. Re:Must resist.... by Itninja · · Score: 1

      I think the argument that Wal-Mart 'drives out' the little guy is somewhat dubious as well. Though it would be interesting to see if Wal-Mart has some level of ownership in those other 'smaller stores'. Those shops rarely own the land they sit upon and I would bet that Wal-Mart (or one of its' LLC's) does. For that matter, do you know if these smaller stores are just de facto Wal-Mart owned chains?

      But I digress. The real hitch for me is not the juggernaut business machine, but the borderline deception to the customer. Wal-Mart goes to a manufacture and says something like 'We want to sell your product and we will give you this dump truck full of money. All you have to do is lower your manufacturing cost by 30% by lower quality or outsourcing your workforce to Mexico.' When Wal-Mart comes on-board with a product, it generally means the entire product line quality is then reduced. Just read the account of Snapper, Inc. and how Wal-Mart changed customer perception by lowering quality.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    7. Re:Must resist.... by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart goes to a manufacture and says something like 'We want to sell your product and we will give you this dump truck full of money. All you have to do is lower your manufacturing cost by 30% by lower quality or outsourcing your workforce to Mexico.'

      I seriously doubt that Wal-Mart says that last part. It may be implied, but I'd imagine that Wal-Mart couldn't care less how the manufacturer lowers the cost. I'd bet Wal-Mart would be trilled if the cost was lowered by the manufacturer making less in profit, but that probably doesn't happen very often.

      Quite frankly, I see Wal-Mart as a kind of free market consumer union. Through Wal-Mart, consumers have banded together to demand lower prices. Some people see only the negative side effects of that (outsourcing, lower quality, etc). Of course, there are negative qualities of traditional workforce unions -- higher consumer prices, corruption, etc. That doesn't mean they're all bad or evil. These, like most organizations, have both positive and negative aspects.

      Wal-Mart is just responding to what they perceive consumers want -- lower prices, at any cost. And given Wal-Mart's success, I'd assume that their perception was pretty accurate. But the great thing about a free market economy is that you don't have to shop at Wal-Mart. There are plenty of other stores that offer different levels of price and quality. The only thing that Wal-Mart does to them is force them to compete -- either lower their prices, or raise their quality. And that is a good thing.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    8. Re:Must resist.... by mike2R · · Score: 1

      WalMart is accused by those it outcompetes of being an unscrupulous retailer who does the socio-economic equivalent of "strip mining" wherever they take root.

      Fixed it for you.
      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    9. Re:Must resist.... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      WalMart is widely recognized as an unscrupulous retailer who does the socio-economic equivalent of "strip mining" wherever they take root.

      And that is unlike every other multinational corporation this century exactly how? I know of no socially consious corporations at all. Every single one from Sony to BP seems to be run by sociopaths who would steer a giant asteroid to the earth if it could somehow increase their personal fortunes. I don't see how WalMart is any different.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    10. Re:Must resist.... by Itninja · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except when the consumer buys, say, Levis at Sears they are getting Levis made by the Levi-Strauss Company - in the levi-Strauss factories. When they get the 'same' Levis at Wal-Mart, they are getting more cheaply made lookalikes, made by a 3rd party, with the Levi brand stuck on them. Still, technically, Levis but not in the way the consumer thinks. Consumers are 'voting with their feet', but only because they have been lead to believe they can get the 'same thing' cheaper at Wal-Mart. Except that it's not the same thing at all, just a cheap imitation that's been branded to look like the same thing.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    11. Re:Must resist.... by PMBjornerud · · Score: 1

      ...urge to support the Wal Mart beast. But Linux is good right? But wait...Wal Mart is not good. Unless, they throw me a open-source bone. Then they're good right? Damn, I hate moral dilemmas. Fortunately, they're sold out!

      This means you can go there and complain loudly to the staff about them being sold out with the good you wanted to buy. It's a godsend! You can now complain about Wal-Mart to Wal-Mart staff and support Linux at the same time!
      --
      I lost my sig.
    12. Re:Must resist.... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Wherever a Wal Mart has popped up here, an entire ecosystem of smaller stores springs up around it. It's the ultimate anchor store. ...
      Rather than coming in and driving out existing shops, the super centers have been huge economic shots in the arm...and if they're so predatory, then why do these other shops thrive right next to them? This was not my point. WalMart owes its success in part through indirect subsidies of its business, such as tax breaks from local communities that are driven by desperation to shake hands with the WalMart "devil", and staff with few or no benefits that are obliged to survive on various forms of taxpayer-funded assistance for health care or even food stamps. And don't get me started on the reports of management locking the front doors so staff can't go home at the end of their shift.

      If you squint and look selectively, you're bound to observe what appears to be a gain from the presence of a WalMart somewhere. However, you have to look at the big picture to get the real story. WalMart's misdeeds are recorded in great detail elsewhere. I won't go into them here any further.
      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    13. Re:Must resist.... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Every single [corporation] from Sony to BP seems to be run by sociopaths who would steer a giant asteroid to the earth if it could somehow increase their personal fortunes. I don't see how WalMart is any different. It's more like corporations are sociopaths. And thanks to a SNAFU that occurred many years ago in the US justice system, corporations in the US enjoy many of the rights of an individual without the accompanying responsibilities. In other words, corporations have the protection of the law to behave like sociopaths if they want to.

      Look, I'm not anti-corporation. There are good and bad corporations just as there are good and bad people. What disturb me are corporations that serve as a kind of golem for the people in charge, and who commit injustices without having to face the consequences that an individual would.

      So what's different about WalMart? Well, like I said, there are good and bad corporations, and I think WalMart is one of the bad ones. But it's hardly surprising that WalMart can be "bad" for a completely different reason than Exxon, Halliburton, Blackwater or any other corporation with a dishonored reputation.
      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    14. Re:Must resist.... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      WalMart is accused by those it outcompetes of being an unscrupulous retailer who does the socio-economic equivalent of "strip mining" wherever they take root. Fixed it for you. You think the only people who are critical of WalMart are competitors? Think again.
      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    15. Re:Must resist.... by linuxcowboy2 · · Score: 1

      No need to resist or for moral dilemmas, the same 200.00 Linux gOS PC is selling now at www.zareason.com

    16. Re:Must resist.... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the corporations themselves are good or bad; that's like saying a gun is good or bad. A .22 rifle used for squirrel hunting is good, the same gun used to kill a human is bad. It's the human behind the gun. Whether a corporation is good or bad depends on the people in charge of it as well.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  18. I don't trust the reviews by Ash-Fox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is something very wrong with the reviewers, I keep clicking "Read all reviews by this reviewer", and the reviewer only did this single review on a product. Which is unusual for people who write their reviews on products (usually they'll have a few others they've written reviews for). They all write excellent English, no grammar mistakes, punctuation mistakes or anything.

    I suspect manipulation of reviews.

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    1. Re:I don't trust the reviews by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I suspect manipulation of reviews.

      Yes. It's called "lying", and it's a popular pastime in the marketing world.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:I don't trust the reviews by rlk · · Score: 1

      And they're all going out of their way to point out that it's running Linux, not Windows, that you shouldn't expect your Windows programs to run on it, and that you should understand what it is and what it isn't. Is this really an astroturf campaign to get people to think for themselves?

    3. Re:I don't trust the reviews by brue68 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or they could have gone to Wal*Mart exclusively for this item. The Ubuntu forums have exploded over this, and there are several people who have bought the product for friends or family. The torrent for gOS had quite a few seeders when I downloaded it (didn't like it). Took less than 45 minutes, more like 30.

    4. Re:I don't trust the reviews by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      I agree, the most notable thing is very few talk about the hardware and instead go on and on about how great Linux is. The reviews that do talk about the hardware give it lower scores. While the C7s are fast enough to get things done unless you are going from a sub 1ghz to it, it will seem slow even under Linux.

    5. Re:I don't trust the reviews by mr_josh · · Score: 1

      While it's entirely possible (likely?) that the reviews are a sham, the third one on the page right now is bemoaning that the shortcut on the desktop for Google opens in WebRunner rather than Firefox. Kinda sounds like a Wal Mart customer complaint.

    6. Re:I don't trust the reviews by Derek+Loev · · Score: 1

      Damn! StupidFilter's at it again.

    7. Re:I don't trust the reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I checked some of the other computer reviews, and found that most reviewer only reviewed one item. This probably means either somebody is stuffing most reviews, or that most people who review only review one product, for whatever reason. It makes a bit of sense though, most people don't buy tons of crap from wal*mart and post reviews on it, but if someone did buy some different sort of PC (ie a linux one), it might make sense to post a review. Furthermore, it really isn't the sort of forum that professional hardware/software reviewers are going to post their opinions, so most of the posts are probably just average people who bought the product.

      That said, the reviews do seem a little funny (like very similar in style). It is also a little odd how that model has way more reviews than any of the other computers that I saw on the site. Again this could plausibly be just because it is different.

      -James

    8. Re:I don't trust the reviews by UltraMathMan · · Score: 1

      This is a Linux machine that's capable of XP or Vista.
      It runs quick, and upgrades easily. Major con is no monitor.
      Tried XP and Vista and it runs like a champ. Definitely recommend this product. Yeah, that definitely sounds a bit off. I mean who would put Vista on that?! A 25-34 year old masochist, maybe?
      --
      Registered Linux User #423733
    9. Re:I don't trust the reviews by turing_m · · Score: 3, Informative

      This seems to be the main thread, there are a couple hundred posts now.

      http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=599025

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    10. Re:I don't trust the reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like Windows and Apple fanboys never fake reviews, right?

    11. Re:I don't trust the reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is something very wrong with the reviewers ... They all write excellent English, no grammar mistakes, punctuation mistakes or anything.

      Well, obviously the reviewers aren't linux fans from slashdot, or walmart employees. I'd say they're trustworthy!

    12. Re:I don't trust the reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It didn't take me long to spot less than excellent english. =)

    13. Re:I don't trust the reviews by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean they're not customers, and it doesn't mean they're not really happy with their purchase. You know as well as I do that if the slashdot crowd wasn't impressed they'd be flaming the hell out of the effort.

      We don't tolerate anything that lives up to a pitiful 90% of our demands.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    14. Re:I don't trust the reviews by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Do you trust user reviews much? I find them to generally be crap. If you look at the reviews on different sites, you'll find that many of them contain much the same crap, then there are some sites with a completely different selection. Of course it could happen to be a very consistent group of positive buyers frequenting the exact same sites - or more likely, it's the "hype list" of the manufacturer and you're either on it or you're not. Traditional reviews actually seem to have less bias...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    15. Re:I don't trust the reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either that or the computer comes with aspell installed by default.

    16. Re:I don't trust the reviews by colourmyeyes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the "too-good" writing seems pretty suspicious. But hey, more power to'em. If it sells these things and people are naive enough (and man, are they ever) to not take nearly EVERYTHING they read on teh intarwebz with a grain of salt, then bravo.

      --
      My grandmother used anecdotal evidence all the time, and she lived to be 120 years old.
    17. Re:I don't trust the reviews by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      There aren't many Windows Fanboys left. If they were they would be dissing this product. Much like how the Apple Fanboys dissed the Zune on online stores. Giving it negative reviews before it was released. But Yes having the system sold out at first is probably do to the media it got... I don't think it is sustainable. After the fanboys got it then the normal public will Poo-Poo the system once they realize that they can't buy software at the same store they bought the computer.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    18. Re:I don't trust the reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They all write excellent English, no grammar mistakes, punctuation mistakes or anything.

      Do you even have a clue on writing proper English? Granted, the reviews there may be better than you'll find in the average "OMG PonieZ!" board - but they're far from "no grammar mistakes, punctuation mistakes, or anything."

      I quit looking after finding the first dozen on the first page in about 30 seconds. Yes, I also abhor script-kiddie l33tn3ss. I also generally don't grammar or spelling nazi troll either - but you're the one making the point of it.

      Everyone sacrifices linguistically for speed or convenience, but please don't pretend to call what's there mistake free.

  19. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Eddi3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I, and others (Like this guy) can tell, a vast majority of the machines were sold online.

  20. Dubious by Paul_Hindt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sounds good and all, getting Linux to the teeming masses...but at the same time the people that might buy a computer at Wal-Mart are probably people that don't even know what Linux is or even what Windows is and that there is even any difference. Some people may have just bought these because, Hey!, $200 for A WHOLE COMPUTER is a steal, right?!

    1. Re:Dubious by jaxtherat · · Score: 1

      I'm not actually sure what your point is. If they buy it, have no idea (or even care) what it is, and it does all the things they want to do, who cares?

      --
      http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    2. Re:Dubious by Paul_Hindt · · Score: 1

      My point being that they may just buy the computer and not even know that they are using Linux or that it even matters. This doesn't really show that Linux is ready for all the masses, just the ones that buy it in $200 bargain computers for word processing and internet, which is a small representation of Linux on the desktop.

    3. Re:Dubious by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      My point being that they may just buy the computer and not even know that they are using Linux or that it even matters. This doesn't really show that Linux is ready for all the masses, just the ones that buy it in $200 bargain computers for word processing and internet, which is a small representation of Linux on the desktop.

      Really? I would guess that over 50% of the average computer-using population (Wal-Mart customers or not) use their computers exclusively for web browsing, email, and word processing.

    4. Re:Dubious by brue68 · · Score: 1

      but that is a large representation of the people that use computers period. Like it or not, that's all most people want out of a computer.

    5. Re:Dubious by jaxtherat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And MY point is that it doesn't matter if the user doesn't know what OS they are using...

      Analogy: a person driving a car shouldn't be able to tell what brand and model it is when he is behind the wheel, right? And guess what? 99.9% of people can't tell you what it is from just the feel of it, only freaks and psycho enthusiasts can tell you the make and model from the stock gear timings.

      The same should apply to computers. A computer is a tool, and it'd be better for linux if it was just usable, instead of distinctive purely for the sake of being distinctive.

      A user not knowing if they are linux when in fact they are has absolutely no reflection on whether it is ready for the masses or not.

      --
      http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    6. Re:Dubious by Dionysus · · Score: 1

      My point being that they may just buy the computer and not even know that they are using Linux or that it even matters.

      For the vast majority of the people, as long as the computer does what they want, the OS doesn't matter. Nothing wrong with that.

      I have a friend I installed Kubuntu for, because Windows crashed and his Windows reinstallation CD was broken. He used it happily until he got a Mac. Didn't care about the OS as long as he could do his thing (minor wordprocessing, surfing the internet, online banking etc).
      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    7. Re:Dubious by Osty · · Score: 1

      Analogy: a person driving a car shouldn't be able to tell what brand and model it is when he is behind the wheel, right? And guess what? 99.9% of people can't tell you what it is from just the feel of it, only freaks and psycho enthusiasts can tell you the make and model from the stock gear timings.

      No, but just about everybody will be able to tell you the difference between a Hyundai and a Ferrari even if you blindfolded them, put them in the passenger seat, and drove them around. Similarly, even "average" people will be able to tell that a Ford Taurus feels nothing like a Honda Accord, or that a Mercedes if different from a Lexus, etc.

      People buy cars for image purposes all the time. If you do the math on many of the hybrids, it doesn't make any economical sense to buy a Prius over a normal petrol-powered Civic yet people buy the Prius because of the image. They buy Hummers and Bimmers and Porsches and more just because of the image. They buy Japanese/German rather than American because Japanese/German cars are more "reliable" even though JD Powers and others have documented that modern American cars actually have fewer problems per mile.

      The same should apply to computers. A computer is a tool, and it'd be better for linux if it was just usable, instead of distinctive purely for the sake of being distinctive.

      But a car is not just a tool. For many it's a status symbol. For others it's a source of enjoyment. For most, it's the second largest purchase they'll ever make (first largest, if you never expect to buy a home). When you boil it down, you could drive a Kia just as well as a Porsche, but I prefer my Porsche :)

    8. Re:Dubious by grcumb · · Score: 1

      My point being that they may just buy the computer and not even know that they are using Linux or that it even matters. This doesn't really show that Linux is ready for all the masses, just the ones that buy it in $200 bargain computers for word processing and internet, which is a small representation of Linux on the desktop.

      I take your point, but that's borderline circular logic you're using. By your reasoning, one could argue that there are no masses - only many many sub-groups, each of which has particular needs.

      The fact of the matter is that Linux is particularly good for a bunch of thin little slices of the group that we, for convenience's sake, call the masses. All it takes is for someone - like, say, WalMart - to decide to take on one niche at a time. Eventually, there's a computer for every need, and each one is running Linux.

      If Linux could be said to have a strategy[*], it would be: Take the ground a yard at a time and hold it. From what I've seen, Linux has yet to give ground to any competitor anywhere it's made incursions. While very few people are maniacally plotting World Domination, I think it's inevitable that Linux (in all its hundreds of guises) will become ubiquitous enough to permanently subvert any corporation's lock-in policies before too long.

      -----

      [*] Linux doesn't have a strategy, as such, because there's no really no such thing as Linux, per se. There is only a horde of like-minded companies and developers, each of whom has individually decided that this agglomeration of software collectively called Linux scratches their particular itch. One could reasonably argue, however, that this flexibility is exactly what RMS had in mind when the FSF was founded, and that events are proceeding as planned.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    9. Re:Dubious by jaxtherat · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. Lets agree to disagree. You see Linux being flogged as a cheap $200 'bargain bin' OS as damaging to it's image, and indicative of it not being ready for prime time if it is touted as such, whereas I see this a boon for Linux and computing in general where computing (and Linux) has just become that little bit more accessible to the masses.

      Deal?

      --
      http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    10. Re:Dubious by argent · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, Linux has yet to give ground to any competitor anywhere it's made incursions.

      Handhelds. Zaurus was a big flashy incursion and now Linux on handhelds has all but become invisible again.

      Possibly the gphone will change that.

    11. Re:Dubious by wordsnyc · · Score: 1

      Most home Windows users have no idea of what OS they're using. As my sister-in-law says, "I just use my Dell." And Ubuntu would work fine for her.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
    12. Re:Dubious by Paul_Hindt · · Score: 1

      Yes that is what I was trying to say. It doesn't really matter what OS is on the computer as long as it works. But for some people they take this as a victory for Linux that it is getting on some budget computers @ Wal-Mart...which doesn't really matter too much if people don't know any better.

    13. Re:Dubious by ferrgle · · Score: 1

      Heh heh, when I ask users what OS they use they generally answer office 2003!

      Although some are now slowly realising that this isn't correct and tell me that they run Office 2007

      Some days it's just not worth asking!

    14. Re:Dubious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It matters for the industry. In particular it weakens Microsoft's position considerably if a substantial number of people start using Linux, regardless of whether those people know they're doing so.

    15. Re:Dubious by ch0ad · · Score: 1

      isn't this the goal though, at least for the majority of the /. crowd? if computers were only being used by people that knew what OS they were using, the number of people using computers would probably be cut in half.if a hardware vendor gets hundreds of thousands of complaints that their device doesnt work with their new [not windows] computer, they have to start listening. if a school or workplace gets a high enough % of people complaining that they can't use their proprietary MS protocols and formats, they have to start listening. obviously this is still a dream at the moment... but just because the users of these computers might not know that they are a part of something bigger doesn't change the fact that they are a part of it.

    16. Re:Dubious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because wants and needs change over time, and current requirements and desires might not reflect future ones. If this was a first computer in someone's home and they now start getting online and seeing the multitude of possibilities that they've shut themselves off from because of the flavor of OS they received with their new purchase, they may have stronger feelings about Linux than 'who cares'.

  21. I don't expect many returns. by Erris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember, these are typical Walmart customers here.

    That is important, they are not like Slasdot readers. Unlike business users or college students, M$ has done no favors for these people and they have zero loyalty.

    How many of them are going to return these things when that AOL CD they have doesn't work automagically?

    I don't know. The EEE has an AOL button, no CD is required. I know it's hard to believe but AOL would be happy to spam users of other OS.

    How many of these people are expected to have DSL or Cable instead of dial-up?

    None. Why should they?

    How many are going to be returned because they don't have MS Office pre-installed on them?

    None. Open Office is more than enough for the average school paper. Very few people actually NEED M$ Office for work and even they hate it. The rest of the world considers M$'s ever changing, secret file formats an expensive ass pain. They are right.

    Anyone who actually needs M$ Office will have their boss pay for it or pirate the junk. If M$ makes the second option impossible, the first option will have to happen or the boss will learn to use free software. M$ is not going to be able to get everyone to pony up $400 every couple of years for a text editor and that's where they system breaks down. Sooner or later, all of those smart business users and college graduates will figure out that they don't need M$ either.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:I don't expect many returns. by lordofthechia · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What I wanna know is 2 things, how effective are the 3D drivers for the onboard Via Video chip. And what repositories is this thing using (How compltete / Up to date are they)? Best thing about Ubuntu are the kickass up to date repositories and snappy package manager (Thanks Debian!). This has Synaptic but not much else is mentioned.

      Wikipedia page is sparse at the moment. On the Graphics side, the Via Arena site I just saw:

      "XVidtune Tool". "2D", "MPEG2/4 Hardware Acceleration", "Hardware Video Overlay", and "TV Out" including HDTV, DuoView So... can I play Neverball, Warcraft III, etc, on this thing?
      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    2. Re:I don't expect many returns. by TheSeer2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Woo. Go "M$" - I mean it's a dollar sign! Geddit? Geddit?! ... no. Almost everyone who uses M$ instead of MS are idiots. It's subtle trolling at its best.

    3. Re:I don't expect many returns. by d3vo1d · · Score: 1

      Good call, remembering who these people are:

      "Even at the low end, however, image is everything. The gPC is built using tiny components, but put inside a full-size case because research indicates that Wal-Mart shoppers are so unsophisticated they equate physical size with capability."

      My favorite quote from the the original aritcle's Wired link. :)

    4. Re:I don't expect many returns. by wonkavader · · Score: 1
      Remember, these are typical Walmart customers here. \ That is important, they are not like Slasdot readers. Unlike business users or college students, M$ has done no favors for these people and they have zero loyalty.

      How many are going to be returned because they don't have MS Office pre-installed on them? \ None. Open Office is more than enough for the average school paper.

      Microsoft may not have done them any favors, but neither has Linux, yet, and most won't know how MS has screwed 'em. They may not know anything about MS, but they know what they use already. I think a lot of these computer will be sold because they are the cheapest computer Walmart offers. You go in to buy a computer, and you get the cheapest one. Heck yeah, there are going to be returns. People will be surprised and won't like that it's different, and some will return it. Some will see that it's different and love that, I'm sure -- especially the younger folks who wind up with them. But to assume there won't be returns because they're different is a little myopic.

      We would do better to be able to explain why there are more returns on this than the usual machine, and to prepare for the fact that Walmart might drop it because of that. The thing is, we want people to buy this "by mistake" -- We want them to be surprised. But then, we want them to pass through that surprise and appreciate it. We want the Linux base to expand. Well, many of us do, anyhow. And this offering is GREAT for that.

      But we need to be realistic and prepared for reality.

      There might be a market for an evangelistic "new to Linux" publication -- maybe even one aimed at kids -- to be free-six-month-subscription bundled with the box. The demographic, past the first wave of Linux folks who are excited about the machine, might be homogeneous enough to warrant that, and it would help them get excited about the new system.

    5. Re:I don't expect many returns. by DAtkins · · Score: 1

      I had read this article and then went to lunch - which happened to be next to a WalMart. So I ran in and bought the last two they have in stock (sorry Midtown Atl...). I assume that Joe-Six-Pack (does anyone else find that term as funny as I do?) isn't getting the box to host a CVS server and SSH gateway - but it'll run that just fine, and save on electricity too.

      The funny thing? A couple weeks ago I bought one of the low-power Intel ITX boards for the same reason, but I never found an ITX case in stock anywhere (and was too lazy to order one online). Now I've got my CVS server, a spare one to see if it'll run satisfactorily as a low load file server, and an spare ITX board that'll fit in a broken NES enclosure for my media pc. Awesome!

      Actually looked into getting one for my grandmother, but apparently another family member beat me to it - with an old windows box. Oh well, at least I don't have to support that one... I was really interested to see if she could use it though.

    6. Re:I don't expect many returns. by westlake · · Score: 1
      Remember, these are typical Walmart customers here.
      That is important, they are not like Slasdot readers. Unlike business users or college students, M$ has done no favors for these people and they have zero loyalty.

      That is a very foolish thing to say, but, given the source, not unexpected.

      I have yet to meet anyone off Slashdot who spells Microsoft with a dollar sign. But I do know that what the Walmart shopper sees is the $50 HP All-In-One Printer for XP and Vista.

      The commodity PC running Windows is affordable and it is everywhere. In a village of 1500 I can walk four blocks and return home with all the consumables my PC will need for the winter.

      I might even find the bargain bin PC game that doesn't suck. Deux Ex, perhaps.

      Open Office is more than enough for the average school paper. Very few people actually NEED M$ Office for work and even they hate it. The rest of the world considers M$'s ever changing, secret file formats an expensive ass pain. They are right.

      Give me a break, Twitter.

      I look at the sales charts at Amazon.com and see anything but extraordinary strength in MS Office sales. MS Office is more than a text editor. Even Sun would admit that much.

  22. good news, but.. by pak9rabid · · Score: 1, Redundant

    this is great news indeed....lets just hope we don't see an equal number of returns/exchanges in a month or two..

    1. Re:good news, but.. by trolltalk.com · · Score: 1

      "this is great news indeed....lets just hope we don't see an equal number of returns/exchanges in a month or two.."

      I'm sure if someone actually returns one, there'll be someone else happy to take it off their hands, esp. with a $20 "open box" discount.

    2. Re:good news, but.. by pak9rabid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah..judging from the customer comments, it sounds like they're quite happy with them. if the walmart crowd is happy with them, then I think Linux is definately ready for the masses.

  23. Cool, but how many did the really sell? by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am very happy to hear this news and pointed a number of people at this machine. But it would be a lot more meaningful if we knew how many they sold out of. 10? Big whoop. 10,000? More impressive.

    1. Re:Cool, but how many did the really sell? by Eddi3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to the article the original /. story linked to, the number to be sold was around 10,000.

    2. Re:Cool, but how many did the really sell? by sdhoigt · · Score: 0, Troll

      > But it would be a lot more meaningful if we knew how many they sold out of. 10? Big whoop.

      Close. 11.

    3. Re:Cool, but how many did the really sell? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I would be more worried about customer satisfaction, whether 1,000 or 10,000. If it works well for people, is available most everywhere, and only costs $199, it will sell.

      These reviews sound good, unless they're all pro-linux shills.

    4. Re:Cool, but how many did the really sell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OVER NINE THOUSAND!

    5. Re:Cool, but how many did the really sell? by MeditationSensation · · Score: 1

      So you're saying they sold... OVER 9,000!?

    6. Re:Cool, but how many did the really sell? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      WHAT!? That's Impossible

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  24. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by cryptoluddite · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So who said geeks didn't buy them out? I almost bought one myself since before this you could even hardly get a C7 motherboard for $200. Average price on newegg is like ~180 now.

  25. Not so fast, slugger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Linux lover, but that conclusion you came to was a hell of a leap of faith. Just because Walmart.com is out of stock does not mean that these things are selling like hotcakes in the stores. And how much of "Middle America" shops at Wal-Mart via the internet? Probably not much.

  26. Modems vs broadband by cumin · · Score: 1

    Last I read on the things they had a modem but it wasn't compatible or at least wasn't configured for the system. I'd be shocked if somebody can't come up with a way to use it if there is demand but I don't think this is being sold as a dial-up capable machine.

    --
    Back in my day when we chiseled our bits into stone and sent them by mule train from village to village...
    1. Re:Modems vs broadband by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has a serial port, so if you want to use dialup, you can always attach a real modem. Those are well supported on Linux, far moreso than internals. So if someone wants dialup, you have a pretty easy solution to give them. I can't imagine that a modem costs more than $25-30 these days anyway. (That's assuming you can't find one for free; people give them away all the time on Freecycle.)

      But anyway, I think this is a moot point; most people who bought the machines probably knew exactly what they were buying. It'll only be when the enthusiast market gets saturated that you're going to see these machines trickling down to the "retractable cupholder" crowd.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Modems vs broadband by o'reor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It has a serial port, so if you want to use dialup, you can always attach a real modem. Those are well supported on Linux, far moreso than internals.
      Yup. Besides, external modems are no longer supported out-of-the-box on Vista. I tried to hook up a serial-line US Robotics Sportster 56k on my dad's laptop lately. Windows Vista simply ignored it, and proposed no solution to try and detect it. Kubuntu, on the other hand, set it up immediately with KPPP. That was one more reason for my dad to abandon Windows and switch completely to Linux.
      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    3. Re:Modems vs broadband by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      well serial ports don't really support plug and play (iirc windows does autodetect serial mice but even that is a bit of a hack) so i'm not surprised it wasn't autodetected.

      looks like it is pretty easy to install a serial modem on vista though, if you go into the add hardware menu and select the automatic option and it fails to find anything it automatically takes you to a list of device types. Select modem you will again get an autodetection screen and again if autodetection fails it will give you a list to choose from including a "standard 56000 bps modem" entry.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Modems vs broadband by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      looks like it is pretty easy to install a serial modem on vista though, if you go into the add hardware menu and select the automatic option and it fails to find anything it automa.... *sleep*
      He just said on Kubuntu he plugged it in it was working. Your solution is way too long.
    5. Re:Modems vs broadband by o'reor · · Score: 1

      looks like it is pretty easy to install a serial modem on vista though, if you go into the add hardware menu and select the automatic option and it fails to find anything it automatically takes you to a list of device types.
      Thanks for the tip, I had forgotten how to handle this under Windows. A few years ago I would have thought of it at once, but the more time I spend under Linux, the less I need those procedures.... not that it takes more time to do it under Windows, as grandson says, it's just that as a newbie to Vista I wouldn't have known how to do it.

      I seem to remember however that previous versions of Windows used to have a Connection Manager which enabled you to set up a connection and a dialup modem quite easily, but Vista (with broadband getting more and more popular) did not offer the dialup option when I tried the new Connection Manager.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  27. look out! by pak9rabid · · Score: 2, Funny

    if this isn't chair-throwing worthy, I don't know what is.

    1. Re:look out! by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      That is the whole point: Walmart makes more profit on chairs than it does on these PCs. They are relying on the Steve inspired fan boys needing to re-furniture their houses after seeing the reviews on their Linux PCs.

  28. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Eddi3 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the motherboard that this computer ships with is on sale for 60 dollars.

    http://www.clubit.com/product_detail.cfm?itemno=A4842001

  29. It was a joke and that is a whooshing sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It was a joke. Let me explain:

    See there is a sort of running joke, referred to as a meme, that is to ask "Yeah, but can it run Linux?" to pretty much any new hardware of system discussion. I could ignore this but I figure there will be others who see it and think that the gp was serious. Still, it I'm embarrassed for you so I'm posting anonymously, so maybe nobody sees this either.

    Posting anonymously is sort of like super stealth technology, I can say anything I want and nobody will ever read it.

    1. Re:It was a joke and that is a whooshing sound by Eddi3 · · Score: 1

      I know it was a joke. However, in this case it actually *is* capable of running XP (and even Vista, which i thought was a little surprising).

    2. Re:It was a joke and that is a whooshing sound by renegadesx · · Score: 1

      In this case the reviewer didnt test Vista and was talking out of his as

      Do you know how crap Vista runs on a machine twice as powerful? Lets just it will make you want to strangle kittens.

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
  30. They forgot an important disclaimer! by distantbody · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unfortunately Wal-Mart have made a huge oversight, and they're gonna have quite a few disgruntled customers because of it. I mean, they forgot the "not good for pr0n" disclaimer!!!

    1. Re:They forgot an important disclaimer! by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately Wal-Mart have made a huge oversight, and they're gonna have quite a few disgruntled customers because of it. I mean, they forgot the "not good for pr0n" disclaimer!!!

      I beg to differ. Pan + unrar + mplayer = god's gift to nerds

  31. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The biggest vote of confidence in Linux is that Walmart even sells it. Walmart doesn't put stuff on the shelves if it isn't going to sell. That it sold out just shows that Walmart was right.

  32. Dare I say it.. or will it jinx it? by cumin · · Score: 1

    This is the year of the Linux desktop. I don't give a crap what metric you were expecting to use, when Walmart planned to stock and then sold out of them, the Linux desktop arrived.

    --
    Back in my day when we chiseled our bits into stone and sent them by mule train from village to village...
    1. Re:Dare I say it.. or will it jinx it? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not the 'year of the Linux desktop.' It's not this year, it won't be next year, and it won't be any year after that.

      But that's okay. Linux -- and other Free OSes -- don't need a "year." They're gaining traction, slowly, and will continue to do so. The migration away from vendor lock-in on the part of the general public isn't something that's going to happen in a single year. It's going to happen over the course of decades.

      The writing is mostly on the wall: the price of hardware has dropped and will continue to fall, and that makes it a lot harder to justify big bucks for an OS, while at the same time more people are satisfied with their current machines and don't want to upgrade, meaning you can't lower your price and make it up in volume. Less revenue means less to spend on top talent, and that means a crappier product. The public may be slow, but eventually it catches on when you try to push too many lemons. (And once it does, it can be brutal and unforgiving; just ask the big U.S. automakers.)

      Microsoft will do what it can to wring the last drops out of the Windows/Office monopoly, but they're busy diversifying as quickly as they can out into other areas. They're too big to just keel over and die overnight, but they'll probably have to pull an IBM: preserve their brand and reinvent themselves as a different company.

      I'm optimistic that when the history of the late 20th and early 21st century is written, it will be remembered as a sort of digital Wild West, a lawless time, when proprietary non-standards roamed and fortunes could be made and lost overnight. But that's all going to come to an end, and when it does, the advantages of open standards -- and, to a slightly lesser extent, open source and Free software -- will be pretty clear. The forces driving that transition, however, are slow and grinding. They're not the sort of thing that lend themselves to a "year of," except arbitrarily and in retrospect.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Dare I say it.. or will it jinx it? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I pretty much agree, previously no one I know has taken the idea of Linux at all seriously but in the last month 2 people have independantly told me they tried Ubuntu and really liked it ( looks much better than Vista even was one comment ) and someone else is asking me which is the best version of Linux to install.

      In addition to that members of my family have bought a variety of consumer electronics which have turned out to run on Linux ( FSG, Tom-Tom and some sort of cable box thing ). I'd say Linux has a higher profile now and is looked on pretty favourably by ordinary folks.

    3. Re:Dare I say it.. or will it jinx it? by kat_skan · · Score: 1

      It's not the 'year of the Linux desktop.' It's not this year, it won't be next year, and it won't be any year after that.

      But that's okay. Linux -- and other Free OSes -- don't need a "year." They're gaining traction, slowly, and will continue to do so. The migration away from vendor lock-in on the part of the general public isn't something that's going to happen in a single year. It's going to happen over the course of decades.

      For a while now I've had the idea that Microsoft's own FUD was going to ultimately contribute in large part to a viable Linux desktop. I think of all the people who used to complain that Linux is too hard to install, and now even though Vista is by all rights the easiest Microsoft OS to install since DOS, Ubuntu's installer is still by far less troublesome. The louder Microsoft crows about Linux's failings, the more temptation there will be for some OSS developer to scratch the itch.

    4. Re:Dare I say it.. or will it jinx it? by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      microsoft is free to create a slimmer & cheaper version of their os, if it turns out that there is a large enough market for that. really what this says to me is that walmart placed too small of an order for these. they could have sold out of 50, or 50,000, but we don't know until someone shows up with some numbers.

    5. Re:Dare I say it.. or will it jinx it? by pigyatbaqaqi · · Score: 1

      It's a nice thought, but there are compelling reasons to think that we need to make it happen NOW. 2008 needs to be the Year of the Linux Desktop. I encourage you to read World Domination 201 by Eric S. Raymond and Rob Landley.

    6. Re:Dare I say it.. or will it jinx it? by Pentavirate · · Score: 1

      Was the cable box made by Pace Micro?

      Those boxes are basically a full computer that runs Linux with a layer that emulates Motorolla or Scientific Atlanta OS.

  33. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by theMAGE · · Score: 1

    ClubIT sells them for $60, with free shipping: http://www.clubit.com/product_detail.cfm?itemno=A4842001#

    I ordered one on Friday, so by tomorrow it should be here.

  34. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by FSWKU · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That a Linux machine is sold out at Walmart suggests that plain folks -- not like you and me -- know and respect Linux. The lesson is that there is a ready market, in middle America, for Linux-based applications.

    Of course with this being Wal-Mart, the more likely scenario is Joe Sixpack reads "Ayy Beth-Ann-Bobbi-Jo-Ruthie-May! They got dem compyooturz at thu walmart for $200!"

    With the absence of "them thar geek peopullz" that talk about "virusin' and spahhhwurin' the box", they can pick one up on their next trip out for junk food, beer, and a few copies of both Guns N' Ammo and American Hunter Motherfucker*. They will get it home, only to find out that it doesn't have Winduh Veesta or run their ancient copy of Deer Hunter.

    The fact that it is Linux-based has absolutely nothing to do with the sales figures. You forget that the system is being sold in a place where the absolute lowest price is the ruling factor in ANYTHING found inside. I can also assure you that the "associates" in Wal-Mart aren't going to know a damned thing about Linux vs Windows, and will answer any question with a blank stare. I forsee MANY returns on these items after Christmas. Maybe by then, stock levels will be back up and I can actually find one to use as a box to tinker around with.

    *Bonus points to those who get the reference.
    --
    "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
  35. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by kylehase · · Score: 0

    So true. If they have not already done so, it would be wise of Walmart to have a nice big sign next to this product stating that it does NOT use MS Windows.

    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
  36. Also available from a small retailer... by christian.einfeldt · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...called Zareason:

    http://www.zareason.com/shop/product.php?productid=16160&cat=0&page=1

    So you can buy it there with a clean conscience. heh.

    BTW, I have no business relation with the family that runs Zareason, but I did buy about $8,400.00 worth of products from them, and Zareason did a fine job of shipping the products to the public middle school that I ordered on behalf of. More details on that purchase here:

    http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/11/1446254

    1. Re:Also available from a small retailer... by littlefoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you want to roll your own, the motherboard/CPU + gOS bundle is still available from http://www.clubit.com/product_detail.cfm?itemno=A4842001 for $60 incl. free ground shipping (and, I guess, whatever tax thing gets applied.. as a Brit that still sometimes confuses)

      Stick of RAM, flash drive, pico PSU & power brick - and you'd have quite a nice, and silent box..

  37. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by cain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That a Linux machine is sold out at Walmart suggests that plain folks -- not like you and me -- know and respect Linux. The lesson is that there is a ready market, in middle America, for Linux-based applications. Will software developers heed this lesson?

    WalMart consumers don't care what the machine runs. They just see a machine than can do email, word processing, and can browse the web. The most important thing about the machine is price. If it ran Windows and cost $200, it would still sell out.

  38. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by bstadil · · Score: 0, Troll

    Quote "people who know little about calculus or physics" Yes and anything else for that matter.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  39. mac mini costs less than $200 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you pay a lot for that "all my friends say wow when they see it" effect.

  40. Burning animals by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    What about soaking a kitty in gasoline, lighting it on fire, and then letting it free in a field of daisies. Now there are some real flames(literally). It's been done. Only with 300 foxes, torches, and fields of grain. Judges 15
    1. Re:Burning animals by renegadesx · · Score: 1

      Any real life examples?

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    2. Re:Burning animals by langelgjm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, PETA was all over Samson for that.

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
  41. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by schnikies79 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't believe a lot of buyers were typical wal-mart customers. These PC's have been blasted all over every tech site for the last several days and each site has been covered in comments about people who want to get one. There are comments on this slashdot article by people who have bought them.

    I think a load of these were bought by linux fans wanting to support linux on a retail box. for a low price.

    --
    Gone!
  42. Just buy it from a mom n pop shop by christian.einfeldt · · Score: 1, Redundant

    There is a little mom n pop shop in Berkeley called Zareason that is selling these things, too.. So you can get the gPC there guilt free. Heh.

    http://www.zareason.com/shop/product.php?productid=16160&cat=0&page=1

    So you can buy it there with a clean conscience. heh.

    BTW, I have no business relation with the family that runs Zareason, but I did buy about $8,400.00 worth of products from them, and Zareason did a fine job of shipping the products to the public middle school that I ordered on behalf of. More details on that purchase here:

    http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/11/1446254

  43. blazingly fast ... Enlightenment WM by localman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Amazing what a decade of hardware progress can do :)

  44. Re:Oh get real by 0123456 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "People just don't have a real use for a very crappy PC."

    Most people I know use their PC for web browsing and word processing; this system would be plenty good enough for that, so long as they had a monitor to go with it.

    Heck, if I can install more hard disks in there I'm tempted to buy one myself and stick it in the basement to replace my desktop system as our file-server... it's got to burn less power than a 3GHz Pentium.

  45. Its no good for Vista, but... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    How many are running pirated XP now?

    and, what kind of tech-support options are offered? might be hard to go online for free Linux support from the web if you can't get online. Hopefully the users will have someone in their community to turn to for help. Someone who won't insult them for not already knowing what to do.

    1. Re:Its no good for Vista, but... by argent · · Score: 1

      If they're not good enough for Vista they're not good enough for XP. They *might* be running Windows 2000.

    2. Re:Its no good for Vista, but... by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      First of all, running XP on that computer wont be a nice experince. Secondly nobody wants them to run pirated XP but its their choice since they own the computer, not rent it. Tech support will probably come from the same place they get all the other support, from me. Im one of those who fixes my friends computers, they very rarely use tech support. Most support for Windows computers is utter crap. People hate it with a vengence. The time it takes people to even get through the phone ques is less than the time it takes me to fix their computer. Nobody insults people for wanting help. What does sting is when the same plumber, lawyer or mechanic that charges you great $$$ for any help wants you to fix their computer for free because they are to lazy to even read the most basic manuals. When someone asks you to do things that are very nicely documented and crystal clear just because they dont WANT to read the documentation i can understand that some people get irritated. Would you perform your daily work for free to strangers that are rude, ignorant and ungrateful?

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    3. Re:Its no good for Vista, but... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 2, Informative
      What?? Any machine not good enough for Vista isn't good enough for XP? Whatever you're smoking, keep it away from me - I need to be able to think straight.

      One of the biggest complaints about Vista I see is that machines that run XP fine are dog slow with Vista.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
  46. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot needs to grow up quick. Just because it's Wal Mart doesn't mean everyone who shops there is unworthy of living. It's a very convenient place for buying engine coolant, sweat pants, basic office supplies, and other every day things. As a matter of fact, it's one of the few places you could buy all of that under one roof. There is K-mart, but their inventory is lacking. - ynososiduts

  47. Re:laughable by Chemicalscum · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow I am intrigued. You must tell me where you got a Mac Mini for under 200 bucks. I'll run out and buy one to install Linux on.

  48. Not yet by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I wish you were right. It is only the year of the Linux desktop when they decide to keep them in stock permanently. Which means they would have to have some other ongoing source. This was just smart Walmart management making a few quick bucks when the opportunity arose.

  49. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by xebra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, are you ever an elitist prick. I guarantee you almost everyone on Slashdot shops at Wal-Mart, because almost everyone on Slashdot is "plain" and normal in almost every respect. If the PC is sold out, 85% of it is because of dorks like you and me. The other 15% is people that didn't know what they were buying.

  50. Detailed specs anywhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to know some things about the computer itself - how many SATA slots open on the board? how many expansion slots? Is there any RAID on the board? Better yet - who makes the mobo?

    For all the hubub about this thing I have seen little in the way of legitimate hands on reviews. I want to get one to use as a NAS/web/ftp server, but can't get the info I need anywhere....

  51. If Wal-mart doesn't have them in stock... by christian.einfeldt · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...Try buying it from this mom and pop shop:

    http://www.zareason.com/shop/product.php?productid=16160&cat=0&page=1

    BTW, I have no business relation with the family that runs Zareason, but I did buy about $8,400.00 worth of products from them, and Zareason did a fine job of shipping the products to the public middle school that I ordered on behalf of. More details on that purchase here:

    http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/11/1446254

  52. wish I had mod points... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    ...because this isn't a troll.

  53. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Protectionism.. welcome to the 80s.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  54. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by kklein · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but your conclusion doesn't follow from the facts. That doesn't mean it's not true, but, personally, I suspect otherwise.

    This machine sold out ONLINE. Where do we (i.e. people like you and me, who know what Linux is) live? Online. I suspect Linux people bought it, most likely.

    The first review on the page talks about installing XP or Vista on it. Just because it ships with Linux doesn't mean it's going to stay on there. As has been discussed a lot around here, Windows is actually free. Everyone knows someone who can get it to them for nothing. This is probably a distant second to the number purchased by existing Linux people, but it's probably worth noting.

    As another commenter pointed out, we don't know how many of these will come back when they don't run AOL or MS Office. Linux is not only NOT popular in Middle America, it's largely NOT KNOWN. The idea that a computer would not run that deer hunting game you also bought at Wal-Mart is alien to many of the people most likely to buy a $200 computer. Unless the machine has a big sticker on the box that says, "WARNING! WILL NOT RUN ANY SOFTWARE YOU'VE EVER HEARD OF!" most people will just assume it'll run software they've heard of.

    I actually have dumped an Ubuntu machine on an unsuspecting Wal-Mart patron, because I just no longer want to be the guy who knows how to get Windows for free, and because I know that Ubuntu is damn easy to use, looks nice, and has a great package manager. I also, however, know that Linux is more a lifestyle than an OS. It means you won't be buying any software at Wal-Mart. It means you won't be running MS Office. It means iTunes won't run. It means you'll be downloading software that is often very good, but of which you've never heard, and which is not being used by anyone you know. It means that if you have a problem, you're not going to be able to call your cousin Earl. It means you are basically on your own.

    Although the lady I gave it to was happy to have SOMETHING, she wasn't very happy when she realized I'd just given her a lifestyle when she thought she was getting a computer.

    My suspicion remains that these were snatched up by Linux people online, and that any sold in stores will either come back when they don't run any software or will be formatted and have pirated XP installed.

    Note that those are suspicions. I'm just working off the same scant information as anyone here.

  55. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feel free to take your MSFT name tag off at any time....

    As for VIA being a commie chip - where are the low powered alternatives from the domestic producers? Shouldn't there be a slimmed down version of windows and a low power / not craptastic celeron processor that the US producers can sell for a less than 400$ price tag?

    I would love a PC with an intel GEODE and windows lite or windows lite server - good luck finding that low power intel chip or an inexpensive OS...

    The attitude of the US producers is one of "Oh, you don't actually want the latest and greatest? go get some of our old crap". The problem with this is that it is indeed crap. The via/nix combo offered by the gPC has clear advantages over winboxes, which is something you can't say of something running win2k and a pentium 3....

  56. France Invented the Personal Computer by meehawl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    trying to promote removing the "PC" from making any money what-so-ever in the U.S., ironically the country that invented the PC.

    A French company invented, marketed, and sold the first personal computer, the Micral, in 1973.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:France Invented the Personal Computer by gl12 · · Score: 0

      Shush, it sounds better this way, you terrorist.

    2. Re:France Invented the Personal Computer by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      yeah right, everyone knows Al Gore invented it.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  57. Walmart Lesson:computers not used much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That a Linux machine is sold out at Walmart suggests that plain folks -- not like you and me -- know and respect Linux. The lesson is that there is a ready market, in middle America, for Linux-based applications. Will software developers heed this lesson?"

    Or maybe what slashdotters say is true and people really don't use their computers for much and hence Linux is adequate

    "The simple machine that runs Linux is good enough for most people. The number one application in America, after all, is e-mail."

    What's that about lessons?

    "Now, Microsoft will kill off Windows XP in order to sell Vista to us. "

    Funny way to "kill off" then. I can still get XP (and will) off newegg.

    "Software developers should tune into middle America and sell Linux-based applications so that we can put an end to this never-ending cycle of bigger, badder OS needing bigger, badder computer."

    Or they can just pimp my cellphone.

    BTW is a C7 better than a celeron?

  58. Wal-Mart is really trying to make Linux sell by christian.einfeldt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wal-Mart has been experimenting with Linux PCs for a long, long time. Here are just a few examples:

    2002 Walmart sells Lindows PCs:

    http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/general-10/wal-mart-ships-linux-pcs-23619/

    2003 Microtel computers with SUSE Linux:

    http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,111557-page,1/article.html

    2004 Linspire computers on sale at Wal-Mart for $498.00

    http://www.news.com/Wal-Mart-debuts-498-Linux-laptop/2100-1044_3-5498006.html

    May of 2007, Dell computers on sale at Wal-Mart:

    http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/15701

    Wal-Mart is not stupid. They know that as the price of PCs falls, their sales volume rises. They have a vested interested in commoditizing PCs. With Microsoft, Wal-Mart gets a limited mark-up. With Linux PCs made by small vendors, Wal-Mart gets to call the shots. Wal-Mart has dollars signs in their eyes, and those dollars signs are dancing with Tux.

    1. Re:Wal-Mart is really trying to make Linux sell by jwisser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ack... I meant to mod this "insightful" but accidentally clicked "overrated". So I'm breaking my moderation by posting.

    2. Re:Wal-Mart is really trying to make Linux sell by Web+Goddess · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Awww how sweet, breaking your mis-mod.

    3. Re:Wal-Mart is really trying to make Linux sell by kseise · · Score: 1

      You missed the 2005 Microtel systems with Xandros 3.0 Standard installed for $199.00. I have one of these and loved it, then I upgraded the heck out of it. I is now a Frankenstein running Ubuntu, but it ran just fine for almost 2 years before I decided to tweak it.

    4. Re:Wal-Mart is really trying to make Linux sell by westlake · · Score: 1
      Wal-Mart is not stupid. They know that as the price of PCs falls, their sales volume rises. They have a vested interested in commoditizing PCs. With Microsoft, Wal-Mart gets a limited mark-up. With Linux PCs made by small vendors, Wal-Mart gets to call the shots. Wal-Mart has dollars signs in their eyes, and those dollars signs are dancing with Tux.

      Think again.

      The "new" Walmart is interested in profit not volume.

      It has been closing and downsizing stores. Putting its emphasis on upscale products like HDTV. Take a look at where it places the XBox 360 and the Vista laptop in its adds.

      Walmart's alleged commitment to Linux has been in fits and starts, none of them of any lasting consequence.

    5. Re:Wal-Mart is really trying to make Linux sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way Wal-Mart has been able to get profits is from big volume. I can't see that changing much. And sub $1,000 LCD HDTVs are not upscale, they are mainstream products aimed at regular Wal Mart shoppers.

  59. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Nullav · · Score: 1

    Remember, these are typical Walmart customers here.
    Wal-Mart's been selling Linux boxes for years now; if they kept running out like this, I'm sure they'd stock more at a time. I'm betting the only reason they sold out like this is the sudden burst of publicity, meaning that a good portion of those buying these boxes knew full-well what they were purchasing.
    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  60. Re:laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ebay, + this g4 with osx is far more intuitive than enlightenment, for people in creative positions mac is a requirement, from desktops to servers mac will always be more affordable and best bang for the buck, that say amd or sun.

  61. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Riquez · · Score: 1

    That a Linux machine is sold out at Walmart suggests that plain folks -- not like you and me -- know and respect Linux.
    No, it suggests that they don't give a crap what it is as long as its $200

    Don't get excited, I think this is exactly what Linux doesn't need. It's a piece of crap $200 computer made from the cheapest parts - chances are its going to last about 6 months. Then all those people will remember that Linux is that crappy computer that breaks after 6 months.
    --
    * Game Over * High Score: 264,846,927 -- Your Score: 14
  62. lol dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
    I think you reached the threshold where your use of the dollar sign to spell "MS" rendered your post unreadable and accidentally humorous.

    BTW, I've yet to meet someone who hates Microsoft Office (the "junk" as you call it, lol), as per your assertion. I guess since OpenOffice is an exact clone of it, they'll hate it too as well, right? I doubt that was your intended point. But I bet that sort of vague power statement does wonders with the moderators.

    Are you what they call "free software evangelist" these days?

    1. Re:lol dollars by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2, Informative

      The GP is actually a well known (some would say infamous) slashdotter called twitter. His posts are usually full of elaborately woven and completely unfalsifiable conspiracy theories about Microsoft that he always refers to as M$. He's sort of a village idiot type around here, ranting and raving to anyone who'll listen. Ignore him, laugh at him, just don't take him seriously. And please remember that not all advocates of open source are as crazy as he is.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    2. Re:lol dollars by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BTW, I've yet to meet someone who hates Microsoft Office (the "junk" as you call it, lol), as per your assertion.

      Agreed. "Hate" might be too strong a word.

      However, tell a small business client that they've got to buy a separate license for EACH station for MS-Office. While you might not get "hate", you're sure not going to get any "sweet sweet lovin' ", either. Typically, they next ask for workarounds to install one copy on multiple machines.

      Personally, that's my big gripe with Office and Vista. MS marketing aside, I can't see the value in paying $400 for a software package that does what its parent company wants. Heck, I have installed an OS that didn't cost a dime and uses an office suite of the same cost... and it does what *I* want.

      ....and I donate to support those. THAT is value.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    3. Re:lol dollars by dedazo · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Please don't pay attention to this guy. He's a well-known troll who's main account is in deserved karma hell right now, so he uses a sockpuppet to continue to game the system.

      Most people who advocate free software are not like this, in my experience.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    4. Re:lol dollars by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Aww, aren't you precious! I love you Twitter-haters, it's a nice break from the regular trolls.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    5. Re:lol dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh look, squiggleslash is using his sockpuppet again! that's so cute.

    6. Re:lol dollars by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually, and this will probably screw my karma to say this, but compared to the shit eater trolls and the old man jumping peckers trolls, I find twitters ramblings rather benign. Hell, after seeing some of the trolls we've been getting here lately (like the vile racist that puts the N word in everything, and the sand n* variation in everything middle eastern) I actually miss the GNAA guys, and I NEVER thought I'd see the day that I'd actually miss them.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:lol dollars by SL+Baur · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've yet to meet someone who hates Microsoft Office Microsoft Office is total hell. The menus take two or three clicks to get right on a notebook for me. I hate it, I hate it, I hate it. (Star Office on Sun's is a little better, but not by much).

      Microsoft Office has an interface designed in Hell by idiots. I hate it. HATE IT.

      You can't do anything that isn't programmed in. My boss, who is a Microsoft fan, fumbles around in its interface, I've watched him. The emperor is wearing no clothes.

      You just think it's OK because you don't know anything better.

      Yeah, I know I"ll be modded down for this. Whatever. Star Office sucks, but so does Microsoft Office.

      I was impressed by what is now known as Microsoft Word before it was bought out by Microsoft, but that was a couple decades ago. What is also impressive is that I see the same kind of fumbling around in a twisty maze of GUI menus all alike that I saw when someone was once trying to impress me with Microsoft Windows for Workgroups. Not more than a couple of years previous, I had people screaming at me at my workplace to not require any of that in the UI guidelines I was writing for that section of the company.
    8. Re:lol dollars by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Please don't pay attention to this guy.

      Then perhaps you'd like to address the issues he raises instead.

      I've listed them below for your convenience.

      • These are typical Walmart customers who have zero loyalty to either Microsoft or Linux.
      • No CD is required for AOL. It is easy for an ISP to be platform-agnostic.
      • DSL and Cable are platform-agnostic, but dial-up users can purchase a modem for less than the cost of a Windows license, let alone Office, antivirus, spyware removers etc.
      • Nobody will return a $200 computer because it doesn't have Office installed on it. OpenOffice does the job nicely, and M$ Office is never installed free on budget Windows computers. Moreover, M$'s ever changing, secret file formats are an expensive ass pain.
      • It won't take long before anyone with a clue realises ponying up $400 in monopoly rent every couple of years for a document writer is pointless when there's another option for half the price and better longevity.
      I'm looking forward to your reasoned response...
      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    9. Re:lol dollars by dedazo · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      The link to xemacs.org in your profile pretty much covers where you're coming from, in case I needed it to figure out that neither you nor your boss have taken 30 minutes to customize Word to work the way you want it to. Let me guess, it's A-OK to spend 8 hours doing the same to Emacs or Vim, but Word doesn't ship with defaults you enjoy, so therefore it's "hell" and you hate it.

      I use Word in "minimalistic" mode, with no toolbars at all. I have a crapload of custom keyboard mappings to make it easier to do things. It works OK, for me.

      OTOH, I've seen co-workers breeze through cluttered Office interfaces (let's turn on all the toolbars, yay!) with no problem whatsoever, mostly because they know where everything is. I doubt they "hate it" at all. I'd say they're quite productive, even. After all, you can customize to your heart's content if you don't like the defaults. Oh wait, I already mentioned that.

      I think people like you are completely disconnected from the way people use software. I'm a developer and I catch myself doing that sometimes as well. But if you dislike a general-purpose consumer software application like Word on principle, don't try to look for exciting technical or ergonomic arguments to come up with reasons to hate it. Just say you hate it and carry on.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    10. Re:lol dollars by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      Ok, so you won't address the issues, but just want to slag the guy.

      Pretty clear who the troll is.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    11. Re:lol dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You slag him off right at number 1, when you say we should ignore his arguments (or, not examine them) because of 2, 3 and 4.

    12. Re:lol dollars by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Hey, I hate it myself, but not as a work user. I started using the free version of StarOffice when I was a sophomore high school, before it became OpenOffice.org because I was freakin' poor and torrents didn't make piracy easy in the late 90's, early 2000's. As a student we don't really have the time to customize the UI of the program as we don't have a particular workstation that only we use. Now, it may be the case that I'm just unfamiliar with the UI or it may be the case that even if I knew it I'd hate it. But down to the bones, I hate the thing and can't be productive on it, it just keeps wanting to autocorrect and autoformat crap and clutter me with toolbars.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    13. Re:lol dollars by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "I was impressed by what is now known as Microsoft Word before it was bought out by Microsoft"

      Microsoft didn't buy Word. They employed Charles Symonyl and Richard Brodie (co-writers of the Bravo WYSIWYG word processor at Xerox Parc), who originally crafted it as a multiplatform, true WYSYWYG graphical program which had some similarities to their earlier Bravo. It was released for the IBM PC in 1983, and unusually for the time required a mouse to use properly, so it wasn't particularly successful because mice weren't standard equipment at that time due to the fact that virtually no software worked with them (the Macintosh hadn't been launched yet, and few people had seen, let alone used, Xerox's Star or Apple's Lisa).

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    14. Re:lol dollars by redtux1 · · Score: 1

      Hi then

    15. Re:lol dollars by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      The link to xemacs.org in your profile pretty much covers where you're coming from Only in so far as it was a lovely rose that smelled bad in 19.14 and needed a maintainer, so I became the lead guy for the next five years. XEmacs is a text editor and that is very different from word processing. I do not confuse the two, but apparently you do.

      ... to figure out that neither you nor your boss have taken 30 minutes to customize Word to work the way you want it to. ...
      Let me guess, it's A-OK to spend 8 hours doing the same to Emacs First: I despise VIM on general principles, BSD vi was OK except for being too heavy weight to use comfortably over a 1200 baud connection on a loaded VAX. I was package maintainer for nvi at Turbolinux (and I often used nvi for touch up editing when I was in the final stages of preparing XEmacs releases) and I don't do the religious war XEmacs -vs- Vi thing unless I'm trolling on alt.religion.emacs or the equivalent.

      Second: Your idea of how much time it takes to make an environment comfortable for you does not necessarily translate to anyone else. Neither does mine, except that in the case of XEmacs, I spent a lot of time hacking on the code to make it easier.

      O.K. You successfully trolled me, hope I have a nice day.

      Comparing Microsoft Word to XEmacs is like comparing apples to oranges -- totally different beasties.

      As to word processors, the Microsoft Word on Microsoft Windows XP that I have unhappily been forced to use compared to FrameMaker for Sun OS 3, a product I was quite happy recommending for document preparation two decades ago is no comparison. FrameMaker 20 years ago was a superior word processing tool to today's Microsoft Word. Of course, FrameMaker used sensible default keybindings so from the first impression to having to do substantial documentation in it was quite easy for me.

      The post I responded to made the unfounded statement that no one known to the poster hated Microsoft Office. Well, I do. Superior products exist, or existed before Microsoft forced them out of business.

      There is one comparison between XEmacs and Microsoft Word that is valid though. When I navigate a GUI menu in XEmacs with the touchpad on a notebook, I can hit the menu item or submenu item I'm aiming at. With Microsoft Word, it's a much touchier situation. A user interface where the human is fighting the machine is a bad one. Microsoft Word in particular and Microsoft Windows XP in general, is tough and just seems broken to me. Of course, as I wrote earlier, if you've known nothing better, then it won't seem broken to you.
    16. Re:lol dollars by master_p · · Score: 1

      "I'm looking forward to your reasoned response..."

      the ribbon mate! the RIBBON! it's so cool! *drooling*...Office 2007 is sooo much better than any other office out there!!!

      [/sarcasm]

    17. Re:lol dollars by SL+Baur · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the history. My first manager, post college was a Word fan.

      few people had seen, let alone used, Xerox's Star or Apple's Lisa I had a homework assignment that required me to use a Star. I was not impressed by Smalltalk and object oriented programming then, neither am I impressed now. Too complex and bug-ridden compared to simpler things like functional programming. (There's a solid reason why Lisp alone of the languages invented over a half a century ago are still alive). The Star was cool though. I never used Lisa, but I was impressed by it. I first saw the Lisa as an intern at JPL. Nice machine and it could also run Unix.
    18. Re:lol dollars by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I am an Emacs user. And you know what, I used it for 3 years before touching its configuration file. Also, my current config file is 5 lines long for using a GUI and 1 line for using a CLI, and 2 more for an obscure programming language I've tried once, totaling 8 lines. I can copy that same file on every machine I touch and have (cumulatively) spent less than half working day configuring it.

      Emacs comes with sensible defauts, you just need to configure obscure functions. Word is a hell to use without configuring, and doesn't get much better after that since there is no way to bind keys to all the needed functionalities. All you get is a bit more screen space or more sane menus. Also, you must configure it on every machine you use, on every upgrade and, if you are not very carefull, on every reinstall.

    19. Re:lol dollars by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      You haven't addressed any of the points you were asked to and just continued with your agenda of slagging off the poster instead. You have,quite rightly, been moderated as a Troll.

    20. Re:lol dollars by Weedlekin · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I had a homework assignment that required me to use a Star. I was not impressed by Smalltalk and object oriented programming then, neither am I impressed now."

      The Star's software was written in Mesa rather than Smalltalk, and it didn't originally ship with Smalltalk (or any other programming language for that matter). Smalltalk was added later as an option, but then so were several other languages, including Lisp.

      "Too complex and bug-ridden compared to simpler things like functional programming"

      Smalltalk itself was a small VM with about seventy low-level functions -- everything else, including the byte-code compilers were written in that, and source to them was traditionally supplied (at least in early versions), so anybody competent enough to program in Smalltalk could fix any bugs that weren't in the VMs themselves. It's also unfair to say that Smalltalk's version of OO was more complex than functional programming, because the entire system, including the language itself, only had two types of entity: objects and messages.

      "The Star was cool though."

      Unfortunately, the initial version was also an entirely closed system which had no development tools at all (the supplied applications were supposed to do everything that an office would need). This situation was rectified at a later date, but the fact that these weren't Star-specific (and didn't even need a Star to run on) meant that they ended up being used to write software for other systems rather than the Star itself.

      "I never used Lisa, but I was impressed by it. I first saw the Lisa as an intern at JPL. Nice machine and it could also run Unix."

      The Lisa system that ran Unix probably wasn't a standard Lisa. Apple supplied a UNIX-based computer with the same hardware that was used a development system for the Lisa itself, which had no "native" development tools of its own. Those who wanted to write software for it required both a standard Lisa to act as a target / test rig, and a development Lisa, which was a pretty expensive setup for software houses, especially when the potential market for their products was very small, so there was very little interest in developing third party software products for it.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    21. Re:lol dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whew! I'm glad the discussion is all about Microsoft here. I was afraid we'd have to discuss Ubumpu and "drivers" and stuff.

      As a regular Linux user for over n years, I am in no way an astroturfer and I really usually hate Miscroft. But this one time I am on their side because I heard that these Linux PCs have radiation leakage that causes baldness, impotence, and possibly explosive shitting. Walmart didn't really run out of them, but is trying to quietly get rid of them to avoid liability. Looks like Linux isn't really ready for the desktop yet!

    22. Re:lol dollars by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      BTW, I've yet to meet someone who hates Microsoft Office (the "junk" as you call it, lol), as per your assertion.

      Hi mr. coward, meet Uncle Steve. I truly HATE Microsoft office, and I'll tell you why.

      I'm a geezer. I've been using office computers since the DOS days. Lotus, dBase II, Multimate. I decided I hated Office some time in the nineties.

      I'd never hhad any trouble at all running any kind of software; all I needed was a book (and sometimes just the F1 key). We'd been using the Word Perfect Suite since we got the shiny new Zenith 486s, and my employer decided to change to Office.

      I'd been using spreadsheets, and as there was a learning curve when we went from Lotus to Quattro I had them send me to an Excel class. It was only 3 days of training but was enough.

      Two weeks later they upgraded to the next version of office, and I was completely in the dark again. Microsoft has a nasty habit of changing EVERYTHING. After playing with it (wasting my employer's time) for a week, it dawned on the that they had cloned Quattro - except that none of the Quattro files would run in Excel, unless I saved them in Excel format with Quattro. Same thing with the Word processing files - Word Perfect would read and write Word files (although not perfectly) but Word couldn't read the Word Perfect files.

      So the first reason to absolutely HATE MS apps is the way they needlessly change them between releases (this includes their sorry assed OSes too).

      The second reason to absolutely hate them is that they aren't compatible with ANYTHING, even earlier versions of teh same MS program!

      Do you have any idea the hassle I had when my employer forced me to "upgrade" from Access 97 to Access 2000? The damned databases were automatically broken!

      I hate MS for a lot of reasons, but the main reason is that I'm forced by my employer to use their badly designed, buggy shitware.

      Excuse me, YOUR badly designed, buggy shitware, mr cowardly MS employee.

      -mcgrew

      PS- The parent was flamebait, and I bit. Dammit, that cowardly clueless MS employee/stockholder who doesn't actually have to use MS's shitware pissed me off. Don't worry, I have plenty of karma, mod me however you want.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    23. Re:lol dollars by vtcodger · · Score: 1
      ***BTW, I've yet to meet someone who hates Microsoft Office (the "junk" as you call it, lol), as per your assertion.***

      Maybe hate is too strong a word, but I sure as hell don't like MS Office. It was sort of OK a decade ago when the alternatives also sucked. But the world has moved on, and MS Office hasn't much.

      ***I guess since OpenOffice is an exact clone of it [MSOffice]***

      In fact, OO is not an exact clone. First noticeable difference -- the Clipboard in OO Calc complies with the Common User Access Specification that Windows software is supposed to comply with. That's unlike the Clipboard in Excel which never has been compliant at least up through Office 2K and probably still isn't. The Excel people are very proud of their (gawdawful) user interface. I can't think why.

      OO Calc has it's problems. For example, legends are prone to get overlaid onto other chart components. But overall, it's free. It's no worse than Excel (what could be? [actually, I know the answer to that--Kspread]) and it comes without licensing hassles. I haven't used OO Writer since Star Office days when it was about comperable to MS word in many areas, but a bit buggy in others -- e.g. Labels. I assume those are fixed. If so, I can't think of a single reason that anyone who doesn't have a fortune invested in VBA Macros would want to upgrade MSOffice rather than switching to Open Office. Those who choose to stick with Office 97 or Office 2000 and can live with a Excel won't be changing to either of course.

      In any case, OO is the obvious choice for a $200 PC user. It'll surely do everything they need. Probably as well as MSOffice. Maybe better. And much more cheaply.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    24. Re:lol dollars by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      So how do I shut off the expanding menus? I hate that! The menu item I need is never the one that is visible. How do I shut that annoying, useless shit off? In all office apps?

      Also, where in Word is the "reveal codes" feature we used to have with Word Perfect? Damn but I miss that.

      Hell, I didn't even know that you could customise Word. It's not like there is any documentation, or that the "help" files aren't completely worthless. I miss the days when I'd get a two inch thick book with an application (I'm hyperlexic), now you get a 25 page booklet with your OS! WTF??

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    25. Re:lol dollars by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      DSL and Cable are platform-agnostic

      Linux (at least the versions I've used, Mandriva and Suse) has no trouble connecting to the internet with either DSL or cable, but the DSL and cable companies have a large problem with it.

      That's one of the things I hate about Microsoft. "We don't support Linux"; I got that from both DSL (don't remember what phone compay, it's been a few years) and Insight Cable. But it turned out that Linux didn't NEED their support, as it "just worked".

      Microsoft, otoh, needed their support but they were incapable of giving me any real support.

      One morning I got up and turned the PC on to listen to tunes, and went to work. When I got home and turned it back on, no internet. The support people at Insight thought I had a bad ethernet port.

      I was about to spend ten bucks on an ethernet card, but was annoyed that everytime I booted Windows it told me it had disabled the CD burning drivers for the software I'd already attempted unsucessfully to unbinstall, and just reinstalled Windows.

      Suddenly the internet worked. Automatic Update had hosed my connection with a piece of shit ethernet driver. Seldom has any Linux distro failed me, but the cable and DSL companies won't support it.

      Of course, if they sell enough of these WalMart mmachines they'll have to!

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    26. Re:lol dollars by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      It won't take long before anyone with a clue realises ponying up $400 in monopoly rent every couple of years for a document writer is pointless when there's another option for half the price and better longevity.
      While I agree with the general point, I feel I have to point out that I'm still using Office 2000, as are a number of my colleagues. There really isn't any need to buy each new version of Office you know.

      (Yes, file incompatibilities - well I haven't suffered anywhere near enough to justify even beginning to think about asking for an upgrade, literally only two or three over the years)
    27. Re:lol dollars by srussell · · Score: 1

      BTW, I've yet to meet someone who hates Microsoft Office (the "junk" as you call it, lol), as per your assertion.

      Hi, I'm Sean. Pleased to meet you.

      There. Now you've met someone who hates MS Office. I'd introduce you to my wife, but she hates Office so much that she hates people who like it, by association.

      --- SER

    28. Re:lol dollars by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Under tools|customize... go to the options tab, and make sure "Always show full menus" is checked. I hate that too! First thing I change on encountering a new office installation. On the other hand I dislike that I can't find a preferences file to keep all my old excel short cuts in open office's spreadsheet application. Not having F4, ctrl+d and ctrl+r is a pain and on the last version I couldn't find the right menu item to fix them.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    29. Re:lol dollars by operagost · · Score: 1

      I was impressed by what is now known as Microsoft Word before it was bought out by Microsoft
      Word was created in-house. They did hire people from Xeroc who had worked on the PARC word processor.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    30. Re:lol dollars by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 1

      The post I responded to made the unfounded statement that no one known to the poster hated Microsoft Office. Well, I do. Superior products exist, or existed before Microsoft forced them out of business.
      Could you tell us which? Surely not OpenOffice (if only for the fact that their Menus are just as clunky as Word's. You seem to be very focussed on this issue. By the way, I quite like the new "ribbons" in Office 2007). Also, surely not emacs and the like. As you rightly say, they are not word processors.

      Don't get me wrong: I've been using LaTeX with AucTeX in emacs to write every single text document (including letters) I printed in the past three years, except for the occasional note to put up next to the coffee machine (for which I use Word) and a few highly customized high quality print flyers I prepared in Adobe InDesign. LaTeX is the only right way for typesetting bare text, but that's not what office users want: They want a shiny screen that shows them how the text they type is going to look on paper, with an interface that gracely reveals more and more functionality as the user matures. In my eyes, Word does just that. And well.
    31. Re:lol dollars by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but I still can't find "Always show full menus" in Word, Excel, or Access. There's a "menus show recently used commands first" that doesn't seem to do anything at all, with a "show full menus after a short delay" checkbox.

      I'm wondering why anyone thought that particular feature would be useful to anyone? Probably the same guy that though "Clippy" was a good feature (I actually know a guy who not only has left Clippy enabled, but likes it. But he's a runner, full of endorphins, and we all know what drugs do to the brain...)

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    32. Re:lol dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you're forced to upgrade to Vista - in which case Office Update stops working. Have a nice day!

    33. Re:lol dollars by fwarren · · Score: 1
      BTW, I've yet to meet someone who hates Microsoft Office

      Back in the mid 90's I used WordPerfect, Quattro Pro and Paradox. All of them better than Microsoft Office. I now support 75 Office users. I have dosbox and dosemu. I often end up using Wordperfect or Paradox to fix some problem.

      For Instance, if you have a document with TextText (2 blank lines between paragraphs) and you only want 1 blank line or indented paragraphs. Try doing that in Word without a complicated macro. In Wordperfect you search for [Cr][Cr][Cr] and replace it with [Cr][Cr], then you could replace that with [Cr][Tab].

      Trust me, there are plenty of Office haters out here. Every time I think "just turn on reveal codes" I start to fume.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    34. Re:lol dollars by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Could be a different version thing, if show menus after a delay is indented below show recently used commands first it's that one especially if it's greyed out when that is checked or unchecked (if it's greyed out your menus should show everything). The wording might have changed (I use Office for Mac at home and 2003 at work).

      I think it came from someone learning that users thought office was too complex and learning that most users only use a few menu commands, so they concluded that if we hide the stuff they don't use it won't be there to confuse them. Of course then they have zero idea where to look when it's there.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    35. Re:lol dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, that's my big gripe with Office and Vista.

      Uh, dude? Nothing's better than Vista. Much better...

    36. Re:lol dollars by djlowe · · Score: 1

      "Thanks, but I still can't find "Always show full menus" in Word, Excel, or Access."

      Assuming that it's Office 2003 Professional (and I'm doing this from memory since I use OpenOffice here at home, and don't have remote access to my PC at the office right now to check: Start Word, right click on the menubar - you should get a menu that has the "Always show full menus" option on it - by default it will be unchecked, but the suboption beneath it: "Show full menus after a short delay" will be selected, as I recall - just check the parent option and you should be set.

      In the images that we deploy, it appears to be global once set - starting Excel, after setting it in Word, and checking the setting, shows it enabled, for example... and it carries over to Visio 2003 Pro and Project 2003 Pro as well, when they are installed, so far as I've seen.

      I always enable it as the default when building/rebuilding a computer from our standard image, then show the user how to change it if they prefer it otherwise (some actually prefer it that way, but it seems to be the case that those that do set it themselves anyway), since the default setting is annoying to me: I don't use Office enough to know where the menu options that it hides due to unuse are located, but with full menus always enabled can generally find what I'm looking for fairly quickly, and I figure the same is pretty much true for the average user, and at the very least, they'll see everything and can look around if they are so inclined before calling the help desk.

      That's with Office 2003 Professional, SP3, BTW - I don't have access to previous versions to check, I'm afraid.

      But, I'd imagine it'd be the same, or similar, in Office XP as well.

      Hope that helps!

      Regards,

      dj

    37. Re:lol dollars by djlowe · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own post, but I misremembered: Start Word, right click on the menubar, select Customize, Options tab, Always show full menus checkbox.

      Regards,

      dj

    38. Re:lol dollars by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      Re: "Nothing's better than Vista. Much better..." Classic!

    39. Re:lol dollars by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I think that's the one thing about Microsoft products that annoy me the most - lack of consistancy. There's no reason whatever why they should have different wording in a Mac version than a Windows, version, or between version 3.2 and 3.3. They can't even keep stuff in the same menu selection between releases!

      But when I'm using a program, I have little time to relearn the damned thing. I hate it when they upgrade Microsoft products at work; upgrading other products is seldom any hassle at all.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    40. Re:lol dollars by dedazo · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry you feel I 'trolled' you, maybe I didn't show enough deference to your obvious problems with customizing an application.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  63. We are not clones of our average here. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Funny

    But Linux is good right? But wait...Wal Mart is not good. Unless, they throw me a open-source bone. Then they're good right?

    The readership of Slashdot varies drastically. Attempts to use social pressure to homogenize it have failed, with great hilarity.

    Apparently you did not get the memo. B-)

    Please do not expect all of us to march in step.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:We are not clones of our average here. by argent · · Score: 1

      Please do not expect all of us to march in step.

      have you ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?

    2. Re:We are not clones of our average here. by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please do not expect all of us to march in step.

      Indeed, we're nerds. Don't expect any of us to march in step. If you see someone marching in step he probably doesn't belong here.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:We are not clones of our average here. by SwordsmanLuke · · Score: 1

      Please do not expect any of us to march in step There, fixed that for ya.
      --
      Any plan which depends on a fundamental change in human behavior is doomed from the start.
  64. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    I've never shopped at Walmart. When I did live near one, I couldn't stand the idea of supporting a store that practiced such disgusting labor practices. Now I live in a county that won't allow them to build. More power to us.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  65. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by wdolez00 · · Score: 1

    Most of the people that bought this probably think that Ubuntu is a new version of Windows.

  66. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by tftp · · Score: 1
    How many are going to be returned because they don't have MS Office pre-installed on them?

    Zero. MS Office is not preinstalled on computers, unless you count a teaser package that only tells you to buy the full Office. Many Windows laptops come with MS Works (not that it's useful for anything...) If the Linux box has OpenOffice preloaded, it's already more than any Windows laptop ever has, and I dare say that it's exactly what most Wal-Mart computer shoppers need.

  67. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by Nazlfrag · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Let's have a look at jobs going at Intel - woah, only 243 positions available right now in China. Lets have a look at where they are and what they do.

    Beijing - Find out more about Intel's lab, research center, and sales and marketing offices in Beijing, the capital of China.

    Chengdu - This assembly testing facility, which opened in 2005, has four factories and two general-purpose buildings. The Chengdu site assembles chipsets using Intel's most advanced packaging technology.

    Dalian - Plans have been announced to build a 300-millimeter wafer fabrication facility in the coastal Northeast China city of Dalian. Read more about Intel's $2.5 billion investment that will become Intel's first wafer fab in China.

    Shanghai - Read about Intel's three major facilities in Shanghai, including manufacturing, labs, software development, and sales and marketing.

    Shenzhen - Read how the sales and marketing office in the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone provides world-class support. So remember kids, buy Intel to support our friends in Red China.
  68. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

    Not all geeks are great at math. I don't know any calculus and struggled through all my math classes.

    The more you know.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
  69. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    True that. Via's boards are spendy for what you get. What I'm wating for is when Intel releases their d210gly2 motherboard. It sports a 1.2GHz Conroe based Celeron, DDR2 slots, SATA, USB and a PCI slot, reportedly all for $70.

  70. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Nullav · · Score: 1

    But a newbie may take it as a warning sign if it's presented in such a way. Or at least that's how I'd react if I saw a big, attention-grabbing sign saying that a product didn't have something.

    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  71. not a vote of confidence in quality by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    The biggest vote of confidence in Linux is that Walmart even sells it.But that doesn't mean it's a sign of quality. Forget thee not of the Wii knockoffs that Walmart is selling.

    Seth

    1. Re:not a vote of confidence in quality by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I would argue that almost anything bought at walmart is of poor quality.

  72. Re:laughable by Technician · · Score: 1

    For 10 cents on the dollar, you can get a sexy trendy and stylish computer that will run the Gimp.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  73. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently at least some of these C7-D don't support "PowerSaver" frequency scaling. So they aren't really the same thing as the C7's sold by newegg. My guess is they dropped this due to Walmart's strong-arm low pricing. Now I'm glad I didn't buy one. ;-(

  74. Sounds like a quest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow I feel that that choosing which laptop to buy should be a quest in a MMORPG somewhere.... dammit, which quest line am I choosing??!!

  75. Well of course by pat+mcguire · · Score: 0

    Wal-Mart underestimated the power of the impulse buy. They put a few linux PCs right near the checkout isle and parents buy their kids one to shut them up.

  76. Another sell-out, just what we need by Stuntmonkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    First it installed Windows on itself, now it's pimping Blu-Ray drives for cash. Anything for money. Somebody's gotta stand up with me and fight The Man!

  77. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by Coolhand2120 · · Score: 1

    Yes, a fraction of the 694 that are available in the U.S.A.. What's your point? Intel is STILL a U.S. company and VIA is still a Chinese company. How many jobs is VIA offering in the U.S.? How many jobs does Intel allready provide in the U.S.. If VIA intends on selling their cheap computer for $200 less than a comparable computer made in the U.S. the government should place a $200 tariff on the computer, that's what tariffs are for, so foreign companies don't dump their cheaply made goods in our markets and drive the U.S. manufactures out of business, I think the focal point of this article is: don't buy that wintel computer, but this VIA computer for less! We don't care WHY it's less, but hey it doesn't have the hated MS on it so it must be good.

  78. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Excelsior · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Should an Apple PC have a warning that it does not use Windows? Should your cell phone, TV, Tivo, Microwave, vehicle diagnostic computer, DVD player? Should a Vista PC warn it's not really Windows compatible? That would be a little like a Mazda RX7 having a warning that this is not a Lamborghini. Buyer beware.

    If people were lining up for this, they knew what it was. They read about it ahead of time. They didn't just line up for the fu...n of it.

  79. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by penix1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or on the other hand, if you had no knowledge of computers and walked into a store only to see a machine for $200 and right next to it the same machine for $500-$700 which would you buy? OS choice really isn't as important as some on /. would make it out to be to the average Joe. All they are looking for is will it do what they want it to do for the cheapest price. Here is where Linux can fall flat on its face if someone doesn't make retail versions of software as available and ubiquitous as Windows software. Put a boxed set of Open Office next to that Microsoft Office suite and then we can talk. You see, there is the problem with this thing. Everything you need is included with the distro making this kind of visibility moot. The problem is that the same time Joe Average is picking out that computer they are also looking at the software shelf loaded with Microsoft centric crap. The moment they pick up that shareware disk for $5.00 and ask, "will this work on that box I'm buying?" will be the kiss of death on that sale. Add in the fact that sales people at WalMart aren't the pick of the crop and mess up even Windows technical issues and it is a recipe for a PR disaster.

    Assuming that at least some of those sales of this box was to Joe Average, this can be a boon or bust moment all dependant on the support they get from WalMart. If WalMart washes their hands after sale (i.e. "All sales are final. Take it up with the manufacturer or Ubuntu") then this could be doomed after all the geeks have gotten theirs.

    Personally, I wish WalMart success on this venture. There is nothing more healthy to a monopoly than competition.

    --
    This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
  80. Try reading this, Twitter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  81. Prejudiced much? by smitth1276 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what you think a "typical Wal-Mart customer" is, but I suspect that 90+% of Americans have access to and occasionally shop at Wal-Mart.

    1. Re:Prejudiced much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't mind them. They are the folks that say they hate Windows but most of them run it, hate Wal-Mart but flock there to buy cheap products and blast America but would starve in any other nation on the planet.

    2. Re:Prejudiced much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words: fatties.

    3. Re:Prejudiced much? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I have access to and choose not to (I use "choose" loosely here, since it's a near moral imperative).

  82. Cheap/Slow PCs are more than capable by JoeCommodore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope these machines are good. I used to buy the $200 Fry's Great Quality machines, but Fry's is no longer selling those

    Me too. Well the architecture is pretty similar (cyrix CPU) but it looks like the software is a factor better, many of those GQ machines didn't have adequate drivers to support the on-board video so you were stuck at 640x480 or whatever. Though installing Mandrake (back then) usually took care of that.

    The thing that really burns me is all the "Good for Light Word Processing"crap these power-system zealots keep spewing - and I ma not discriminating here, all of the platforms, Windows, Mac and Linux are full of em. I can tell you that machine (512MB RAM/80GB HDD) is probably capable of some great DTP (Scribus) could be great for illustration (Inkscape) and really serious office work (OOo). It may not be fast at doing such things, but we should never say it is not capable.

    As a Classic computerist I know of authors who write books and other published works still on Commodore 64s, (heck some have never left their typewriter behind). To them they get familiar with something and stick to it they don't upgrade because they are to busy being productive with what they have (the hard part is finding replacement parts for their daisy wheel printers). Same reason why the XO will be a hit with kids, they will not see those laptops as underpowered or slow, but the draw is they have access and the speed isn't really a factor when you are starting out (as they get better and outgrow it, then that's another matter; it took me years to outgrow the VIC-20).

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Cheap/Slow PCs are more than capable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear you brother. I did my university thesis on a Commodore 64 back in the 1990s and would have probably used it a few years longer had it not finally died.

    2. Re:Cheap/Slow PCs are more than capable by Afief · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about?
      I am using two 512MB RAM with 80GB HDD computers here for all my OO.o, Inkscape, Blender and GIMP work. The only time where I think I might need some more Ram(1 GB for 80$?) is when I do fluid simulation in Blender or try to work on two dozen high resolution layers in Gimp.

      I am not gonna say that 512MB of ram should be enough for everybody, but unless you're doing some power work(Cinellera? huge scenes in Blender? 100 Layers in Gimp?) 512MB is more than enough for word processing and some light gaming...

      Heck my brothers are in love with Metal Blob Solid and it's a 2D game!!!

    3. Re:Cheap/Slow PCs are more than capable by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      What really burns me is that there is even a distinction between Light and Heavy? word processing. WTF?
      OOH, look at my leet mail-merge skills... I'm an uber-geek! All you light word processers can't comprehend the awesome power of MicroSoft Word!

      And what is considered a power user now days? Someone who runs exploder and word at the same time, and has a configured mail client? In my days you had to build your own machine and run programs that none of your peers could understand before you were considered a power user.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    4. Re:Cheap/Slow PCs are more than capable by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I can tell you that machine (512MB RAM/80GB HDD) is probably capable of some great DTP (Scribus) could be great for illustration (Inkscape) and really serious office work (OOo). It may not be fast at doing such things, but we should never say it is not capable.

      I always have to shake my head in amazement when people write off these machines. By every performance metric, they're many times better than the servers we ran a whole ISP off of in the late 90s. We could route email for 5,000 users on a Pentium 166, but some wonder if a 1.5GHz machine with half a freakin' gig of RAM may be enough for more than "light" word processing?!? People need to revisit their ideas of what these little machines are capable of.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Cheap/Slow PCs are more than capable by jsgrahamus · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the memories. I remember typing a number of college papers on my C-64 and the dot matrix printer using the Quick Brown Fox WP cartridge. It was great. Plug it in, turn on the computer and it was ready to run. I remember the command/typing modes with fondness ;-) Steve

    6. Re:Cheap/Slow PCs are more than capable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But were those 5000 users each getting 1000 spam messages a day?

  83. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by renegadesx · · Score: 1

    When will slashdot invent the mod "-1, duche"

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  84. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Gigiya · · Score: 1

    Plain folks -- those not like you and me -- don't know what Linux is. They know they bought a reasonably functional $200 computer.

  85. Ha! by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew it! I knew Linux is going to sell out some day! I told you Linux is just as evil M$FT! Sold out to Walmart of all people.

    *RTFA*

    Oh. Good job, carry on.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  86. Hah! I can image the tech support calls now by Scoldog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Customer - "Hi, I have a problem with my computer, it won't boot"

    Walmart - "What operating system do you have installed"

    Customer - "Windows Vista"

    Walmart - "I'm sorry, that PC shipped with Linux. You'll have to reinstall that before we can help you!".

    Next thing you know, they'll blame faulty hinges on Windows!

    --
    This space for rent
    1. Re:Hah! I can image the tech support calls now by Arimus · · Score: 1

      Bad example - looking at the specs while it might boot vista you'd better bring a mug of coffee and a sandwich along while you wait for it to boot ;)

      (And can some one please tell me why as technology advances do we have to suffer ever increasing startup delays... )

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    2. Re:Hah! I can image the tech support calls now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (And can some one please tell me why as technology advances do we have to suffer ever increasing startup delays... )

      Actually, I found that upgrading the Linux kernel from 2.6.20 to 2.6.23, and switching to the new CFS scheduler, caused my boot sequence to speed up.

      Now all we need is a mainstream parallelized boot sequence.
    3. Re:Hah! I can image the tech support calls now by padonak · · Score: 1

      Now all we need is a mainstream parallelized boot sequence. I don't know what distro do you use, on Gentoo this is as simple as adding

      RC_PARALLEL_STARTUP="yes"
      to /etc/conf.d/rc
      Pretty soon all major distros will have something similar by default, if they don't have it already.
    4. Re:Hah! I can image the tech support calls now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno about you, but Vista boots faster than XP on my machine. You have actually tried Vista, right?

    5. Re:Hah! I can image the tech support calls now by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I find your hypothetical, unbelievable. Most Walmart customers (and computer users in general) don't know what an "operating system" is. If you ask them if they're running Windows some will say that they think so, but very few will be able to tell you which version and I doubt if most running Linux will know it isn't Windows.

    6. Re:Hah! I can image the tech support calls now by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      What is "parallelized boot sequence"?

    7. Re:Hah! I can image the tech support calls now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every party needs a pooper
      Which is why we invited you
      Party pooper
      Party pooper!

    8. Re:Hah! I can image the tech support calls now by Arimus · · Score: 1

      Yep, but not on the same machines as I've got running XP.

      (I'm going to destroy my karma here - I actually think Vista is actually not to bad an OS, having said that I use vista for gamming and photoshop work so not really tasked it as much as my linux installs - oh and the odd bit of browsing while watching TV)

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    9. Re:Hah! I can image the tech support calls now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is your friend.

  87. Re:Oh get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got one a couple of days ago. Great little machine. Dead quiet except for a small fan on the CPU heatsink which seems to run all the time. Truth be told, I doubt that it even needs that fan as everything on the board remains cool to the touch even after a couple of hours of running. I've never heard the fan in the power supply run. It has two PCI slots (one taken by a modem that I don't need), two IDE connectors and two SATA connectors plus all the stuff you'd expect to find. The case has room for another four drives beyond the DVD drive and 80Gb disk it comes with. I bumped it up to 1.5Gb memory (1Gb stick for $40 at Fry's because they were out of the $30 sticks), installed a 200Gb disk from my spare parts bin and loaded WinXP to test performance. Zero complaints - except that I'm going to have to buy a quieter disk drive because it's the loudest part of the system.

  88. Re:How many will be returned? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's funny how this is modded down as a troll but I'm expected that there really will be a lot of disappointed customers. Some may successfully adapt anyway, but a large proportion won't.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  89. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by rve · · Score: 1

    All people interested in Linux on a PC (no proof, just a guess :) ) will install their own operating system over the one their PC came with!

    For a store like Walmart (or Dell or almost any other general consumer brand), selling PC's pre-installed with Linux has nothing to do with a demand for linux, but for PC's without a windows licence fee.

    I you already have a pile of unused legal windows licences, you don't really need another one.

    Selling PCs without an operating system would not make sense, and might even get them into legal trouble as it could be seen (by Microsoft) as a blatant invitation to pirate software, so they are trying linux instead.

  90. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by wwwillem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many AOL users even know what an OS is ??

    --
    Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
  91. OT: Get therapy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets just it will make you want to strangle kittens.

    What's with you and the whole killing/burning animals thing? Just a little ways upthread you're asking about burning them, here's it's strangling...

    That's some disturbing shit.

  92. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by oatworm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right after someone invents the mod "-1, can't spell douche"

    Thank you, thank you - I'm here every night. Be sure to tip your cocktail waitress.

  93. Re:laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ebay, + this g4 with osx is far more intuitive than enlightenment, for people in creative positions mac is a requirement, from desktops to servers mac will always be more affordable and best bang for the buck, that say amd or sun. I hope you're creative. You write at a third grade level.
  94. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by yyttrrre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't shop at Walmart. I don't like their business practices so I choose to spend my money elsewhere. Maybe everyone doesn't have the luxury to avoid buying at the lowest common denominator.

    Every time I walk into a Walmart it's full of wretched looking shoppers and employees that appear even worse. I would rather not spend my evening or weekend standing in line with my items waiting because Walmart can't be bothered to hire more cashiers. It isn't as if they cost much to employ. On average Walmart doesn't even pay health care for their employees.

    It's really great that Linux based PC's are selling but after all the horrible experiences I have had at that place I'm not willing to recommend shopping there to anyone even if only online.

  95. I disagree by fbartho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This development has gotten so much press in the tech world, that people who would otherwise never bring their business to Walmart (or at the very least would never review products for it) found the need to make an exception for something they considered temporarily more important: to support a big 3rd party making a big step in the right direction: moving away MS's monopoly, and making it possible for the average person to do so too. If this was not such a big deal, and this laptop was a normal product then you'd probably see more reviews from reviewers with longer, more respected review histories. Also, many retailers filter there reviews to some degree, moderating away the excessively vulgar, inappropriate reviews... those usually rate the product badly, so of all the reviews made, more poor reviews end up being deleted.

    The reviews on Walmart could be subject to that sort of deletion process, or they could just be completely benign, the stores having been flooded by Linux afficionados absorbing all their supply, leaving few to no laptops for any random regular Joe Lusers to try.

    --
    Gravity Sucks
    1. Re:I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      scratch laptop, replace with desktop
      scratch "there reviews" replace with "their reviews"

  96. Aargh! by symbolset · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had it in my cart this morning. Didn't close the deal. Maybe I can catch the next round. I also would like to know how many they sold and how fast. If any come available open box maybe I can get one of those.

    I have the 1.3GHz via, and I like it. With Vista any kind of video is a slide show, even with the XP drivers loaded. Runs XP decently well with 1GB of memory. With Ubuntu it's just a regular PC. Power efficient, there are kits to scale it down for your car. It's not a toy -- you can do real stuff with it.

    If anybody bought one of these and aren't happy with its linuxy wierdness, try selling it on ebay. I think you'll do better than taking it back to the store. :-)

    I'm not buying the $299 one with Vista and twice the RAM. They can keep that. You can get a 2GB stick of DDR2-800 at newegg for $50 so if they wanted $250 for the box with 2GB in it I could go there.

    WalMart does not like to run out of stuff. I wonder if they'll take this as a sign that Everex isn't ready to be a WalMart supplier, or as a sign that we're all ready for the smokin cheap environmentally friendly linux pc. Can Via even make the motherboards to meet the demand? I hear their output is rather limited.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Aargh! by kb0hae · · Score: 0

      HAH! Maybe at the national level or at your local store Wal-Fart "does not like to run out of stuff". The local store here doesn't give a rats ass! Empty shelves for days or weeks are a common sight, in some cases months. This is on common items, not special purchases or anything. I know several employees, and they say that the store here is more concerned with keeping costs down by not hireing enough checkers (and not paying enough to keep them) According to these employees and my own observations, they could keep costs down by eliminating the management people who stand around BSing with each other instead of doing any work. I see them whenever I go there, and they are not talking aboutstore business. Also, I think that the BS inventory system is partly to blame. Most employees spend most of their shifts scanning items for their department in the back room instead of keeping shelves stocked.

      All things considered, Wal-Fart here sucks. Still, us poor people are forced to go where we get the lowest prices.

    2. Re:Aargh! by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's not a toy -- you can do real stuff with it.

      You put me straight into geezer mode with that statement - This blows my mind. The IBM XP is a quarter of a century old, had a 5mhz clock speed (this box has a 1300mhz clock speed), had 64K of memory and a ten mb hard drive, and guess what? you could still do real work on it! Spreadsheets, word processors, statistics, databases; I used these things at work in 1987 (we also had a couple of 286s and the blindingly fast 386 at the time).

      I bought one used, the one I bought for my home had a Hercules card so was capable of graphics. I bought some extra memory and a joystick port, installed them, and had a gaming machine.

      Real work? Pshaw, when the 486 (capable of internet A/V, could sample and play CD quality WAV files) came out a computer like the Wal Mart Ubantu box was a supercomputer.

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Aargh! by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 1

      How well does video / 3D do on it on Linux? CCP recently made a linux version of the Eve Online client available, and I've been curious how it performed. It would be very cool if it worked on a minimalist PC like this.

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    4. Re:Aargh! by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Your brain has been blown. There is no such thing as the IBM XP. There's the Microsoft XP. The IBM thing is the IBM XT! :)

    5. Re:Aargh! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Two words: "You're lazy".

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    6. Re:Aargh! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      You're right, it was the XT.

      In my defense, yesterday was a holiday so today's Monday for me. And I went drinking with a couple of professional drinkers over the weekend (note to self- don't do that again)

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    7. Re:Aargh! by Bombula · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Give me a minute here to figure out ... what this implies ... about newer MS operating systems... urrrrmmmmm.... DAMN. I thought I had it there for a second, but your comment's significance has eluded me...

      --
      A-Bomb
    8. Re:Aargh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And (to agree with the parent) wholly clueless...

    9. Re:Aargh! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Only at slashdot would "your comments signifigance eludes me" be rated "insightful".

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    10. Re:Aargh! by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I have the gPC now. I got it from zareason.com as another /.er suggested. $227 delivered.

      First impressions: The linux environment is not bad. As I type this I'm watching the "Brainy Baby: Shapes and Colors" Dvd and Lupe Fiasco - "Superstar" on youtube. To be honest the fullscreen view in youtube looks awful even with my 4mbps broadband connection. The smaller size plays just fine after I downloaded and installed flash. The DVD plays just fine. My screen is 1600x1200. Responsiveness is nice and snappy. It comes with PS/2 ball mouse and PS/2 kb.

      Let's not complain about my eclectic tastes, shall we? I have my reasons.

      Anyway, this is a micro-atx, not a mini-itx. It has 2 SATA ports (both free), 2 DIMM slots for DDR2 (one filled with the 512MB stick), 2 PCI slots - one taken up with the useless modem. No AGP, no PCIe. In the back VGA and 4 USB ports, PS/2 mouse and KB, serial and parallel (why?), 100mbps network, standard power and that's it. Comes with a 200W PSU.

      The case has bays for 8 drives (2-5.25"), three of which are taken. It's a standard chassis, and has spots for several case fans though none are provided. It's micro-tower form factor and my impression is cheap, but not too cheezy.

      The drive is 80GB IDE. They get thinner every year.

      I'm writing this on it. It'll do for my purposes. I doubt it would be good for gaming.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  97. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of these people are expected to have DSL or Cable instead of dial-up? I agree that Linux used to have terrible modem support, and I've not looked into it in a while so it may still, but when I upgraded to Kubuntu 7.10 my modem that has had zero support forever was suddenly recognized and had a driver available. So maybe things have improved...
  98. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

    Excellent question! I bet most AOL users go to Wal-Mart and buy a cheap computer. They don't understand the specs or anything like that.

  99. what about QuickTax ?? by wwwillem · · Score: 1
    [...] we don't know how many of these will come back when they don't run AOL or MS Office.


    That's all fine, people can live without Microsoft Office and more than you expect are now on cable or DSL.

    But wait three to five months, until it doesn't run QuickTax .....

    --
    Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    1. Re:what about QuickTax ?? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      It won't need to run QuckTax, the browser based Tax preparation sites are good enough for the majority of folks that file 1040A/1040EZ forms.

  100. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    We also shop there at times because there might just not be anything else left. Wallmart killed off all the competition in the area ages ago. I hate shopping there, wish there was something else, but those are the breaks.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  101. Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the link.

  102. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    That a Linux machine is sold out at Walmart suggests that plain folks -- not like you and me -- know and respect Linux.
    Once, I carried the same hopes you did. After doing an endless amount of "helpdesk" support for people, I will say:

    a)Plain folks hardly understand the difference between Windows and OS X, let alone Linux
    b)If Plain folks bought this, it was purely for the price tag. The other customers are geeks or had Linux experience before and preferred it (no malware for one).
    c)A few of the buyers bought it to load XP, pirated, on it. It's a cheap machine.

    This isn't to say that there will be no converts to Linux -- but I don't think average people knows what it is.
  103. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by SMS_Design · · Score: 1

    ...Um. Did you just imply that a processor has a political affiliation? Congratulations, sir, you're an effing loonie.

  104. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Touche!

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  105. But I'm confused. by onefriedrice · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait... does this mean that we like Walmart now?

    Just wondering...

    --
    This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    1. Re:But I'm confused. by aichpvee · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, it certainly does not. Now maybe if they were shipping Slackware or something...

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    2. Re:But I'm confused. by hdparm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Heh. Top that with Enlightenment (which is actually shipped on these) and you get easy distro for typical Wal-Mart buyer.

      Then, for the next shipment, you cut down on setup costs and provide the machine with Gentoo minimal CD bundled.

      ?

      Profit!

    3. Re:But I'm confused. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd rather see them bump up the ram and video and install regular Ubuntu with Compiz tricked out. I'd really like it if Linux wasn't always put on low end machines and viewed as a cheap alternative for doing basic things. It should be viewed as a high end desktop/server that's very powerful (which is the truth).

    4. Re:But I'm confused. by d3ac0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wait... does this mean that we like Walmart now?

      Just wondering...


      I never disliked Walmart. Although I am aware of the reasons many people do not like Walmart. (No, I don't need them reiterated here, thank you.)

      One thing I've suspected for awhile, is that the "Linux Revolution" (Linux taking off as a desktop alternative) would NOT happen at businesses or with high-end users. It will happen much like the "Windows Revolution" happened back in the 90's. It will start with the "Walmart buyer". Ordinary people making ordinary FINANCIAL decisions to buy a cheap PC.

      This is the regular, ordinary, joe-sixpack, "what's a right-click?" kind of person. The kind of people scorned by many of the elitists in the OS and PC fields. The people looked down upon by many many many here at Slashdot as backward, ignorant rubes living in "flyover country". The kind of people that voted for GW Bush, that fly American flags from their porches, that have communities with 4th of July parties that everyone in town attends. Small-town middle American traditional people.

      THEY are the ones that will start the Linux revolution. Not because they "did the research" or "grok FOSS" or any of that elitist crap. But because it makes financial sense to buy a $200 US PC that can do everything they need it to do. They will get introduced to Linux for the first time, perhaps as their first PC EVER, and will love it. They will stick with this machine for at least 5 years, as it will be able to handle all the basic tasks they need it for, and when it dies or they need another, they will look for another LINUX PC to replace it with.

      The Linux revolution begins... In Iowa, at Walmart.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    5. Re:But I'm confused. by xgr3gx · · Score: 1

      Wow, I'm torn. I hate China-mart...I mean Killing-US-Manufacturing-Mart....I mean Lowprices-On-The-backs-of-Taxpayers-Mart, I mean Walmart. Sorry, stepping off the soapbox. Anyway, this is great. The average computer user, who doesn't know about hardware specs, shouldn't have to buy basically a gaming rig simply to support the OS . That's ludicrous. You don't need 2GB of Ram (4GB recommended) and a dual core processer for "Surfing the web, and emailing" That's great, I'll give a +1, maybe even a +2 to Walmart.

      --
      Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
    6. Re:But I'm confused. by paganizer · · Score: 1

      I agree with you almost completely.
      I think there is one major factor you are leaving out; until people can walk over to the software aisle, pick up 3 titles, and have at least ONE of them work on their Linux PC... the great unwashed Wally World masses will not switch to Linux.
      I have to drive a little over an hour to buy software or hardware from anyplace that has comparable prices to Walmart, and I need a shower, so I'm one of those unwashed Walmart shoppers. And I've been running Slack since 2.1, Unix before that. Until the time that regular people can use a Linux PC to do what they want to do, like play a popular gaming title or run the latest version of boxed Tax software, it'll never go mainstream (outside of internet appliance use). never. ever.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    7. Re:But I'm confused. by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      And I've been running Slack since 2.1, Unix before that.

      I've been running Linux for almost 10 years so I'm an old time Linux nerd myself. That fact automatically makes the two of us unqualified to talk about what the "average user" is looking for.

      But just for shit's and giggles ... I only know a handfull of people who go to a store to buy software. Most people that I know use what came with their computer or what someone gave them on a pirated cd. And it's usually web browser, office tools and games.

      Games and devices I will give you. It's not just software per-se ... but being able to go and buy any web cam or scanner and plug it in and know for certain that it will work because it says "Linux supported" on the box. That's a far way off. But that will come as more users come. It's kind of a catch 22 ... with no users it doesn't make financial sense for companies to support Linux and with no companies that support it there's no users willing to switch.

      Having a big name company like Dell, Walmart etc. offer pre-packaged Linux PCs for cheap with out-the-box software pre-installed to accomplish the most common tasks is going to go a long way towards instilling trust in Linux. Now people know that if they buy this machine and it's crap they can take it back to the company they bought it from without having voided their warranty by installing Linux on it themselves etc. But more importantly they have no reason to think that it might be "crap" to begin with because they've got some big company brand name associated with the product.

    8. Re:But I'm confused. by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      I agree with you to a point. The problem is that "power users" often have very specific applications that require that power. Photoshop, games, AutoCAD, Maya/3D Max etc.

      The only "power task" (on desktops and workstations) that I can think of where Linux really shines is for programming and most programmers that I know absolutely love *nix and the ones that use Windows usually have good reasons (their employer is a win32 shop or they play a lot of games at home etc.)

      The only way that kind of software will get ported is if the manufacturers see a market. There's a couple of ways that can happen but one of them is getting as many "average at home users" using Linux as possible. And the best way to do that is to give them incentive to chose Linux over Windows ... and how many of them do you think are willing to do so on technical merits alone ? Especially considering there are many trade-offs (lack of games, commercial software and hardware you can "just buy and plug in" without researching first to make sure it's supported etc.).

    9. Re:But I'm confused. by jejones · · Score: 1

      >The Linux revolution begins... In Iowa, at Walmart.

      Where in Iowa? I'm in Des Moines, and the web site tells me that there's not one within 100 miles of my ZIP code... *pout*

    10. Re:But I'm confused. by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      And please don't forget, there are plenty of us elitist bastards....in Iowa.

      Maybe you meant Missouri. ;)

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    11. Re:But I'm confused. by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      But because it makes financial sense to buy a $200 US PC that can do everything they need it to do.

      It may right now. Then they may find that it doesn't, especially if they want a decent financial program to manage their money. Oh, nevermind.. Seriously though, there will come a time when they want to do something, and can't. Or try to add a printer they also bought at walmart, and it won't work. Then they'll be told "that only works on Windows." Suddenly, they may hate Linux.

      They will get introduced to Linux for the first time, perhaps as their first PC EVER, and will love it. They will stick with this machine for at least 5 years, as it will be able to handle all the basic tasks they need it for, and when it dies or they need another, they will look for another LINUX PC to replace it with.

      I think this is a lot of wishful thinking on your part. Until Linux does have the drivers and the applications, I foresee these people getting frustrated, and choosing to buy Windows next time around.

    12. Re:But I'm confused. by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I suspect that tax software is going to be entirely online before too long, just because the important part is the sequence of forms and calculations, and the program isn't that interesting. Popular games are all going to be for the Wii, so that's not relevant. And most of the other stuff just comes with the computer.

      I'm actually kind of surprised that tax software isn't available for Linux yet. The smart thing would be for TurboTax to be a free program for Linux, but require a yearly CD of this year's forms in order to do anything useful. And it would efile through TurboTax's servers, so you'd need to buy a copy in order to have that aspect work.

    13. Re:But I'm confused. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      One thing I've suspected for awhile, is that the "Linux Revolution" (Linux taking off as a desktop alternative) would NOT happen at businesses or with high-end users. It will happen much like the "Windows Revolution" happened back in the 90's. It will start with the "Walmart buyer". Ordinary people making ordinary FINANCIAL decisions to buy a cheap PC.

      I'd argue that the Linux revolution started with the business crowd quite a while ago. There are quite a few large businesses that have moved some or all of their workstations to Linux as a cost saving measure. I think some uptake by the low-end home user is a good thing, but I don't expect it to be a major influence for a while (although if Walmart really pushes it, that could change). The truth is, Linux machines for the home have more drawbacks than Linux machines for office workers in many fields. Home users still want to play games and use Windows only services. Even for applications where there are free applications on Linux, many users don't know how to find them and if it isn't on the shelf at Walmart (which they aren't right now) they might as well not exist.

      The popularity of this machine is a good sign, but I don't see penetration from this direction as a likely major factor for a while.

    14. Re:But I'm confused. by DrCode · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I'd been using Taxcut for several years, and it was always a headache. There were bugs with installation; and no matter when I bought the package, it insisted on downloading a huge update before it would run.

      Last year, I tried one of the online services (forgot the name), and I'll never go back to boxed software. It was cheaper, included online filing (without any of the stupid rebates that the others required for their 'free' filing); I never had to deal with updates; and I could use it at home or work. And it performed just fine in Firefox on Linux.

    15. Re:But I'm confused. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      THEY are the ones that will start the Linux revolution. Not because they "did the research" or "grok FOSS" or any of that elitist crap. But because it makes financial sense to buy a $200 US PC that can do everything they need it to do. They will get introduced to Linux for the first time, perhaps as their first PC EVER, and will love it. They will stick with this machine for at least 5 years, as it will be able to handle all the basic tasks they need it for, and when it dies or they need another, they will look for another LINUX PC to replace it with.

      Sure they'll love it. Until the first time they try to run The Sims - or a variety of other popular PC games. Or until the first time they try and upgrade a component - and find that it doesn't Just Work. Or the first time they try and install a program they find on the 'net and discover library and dependency hell. Or the first time they need support...
    16. Re:But I'm confused. by Giraffefairie · · Score: 1

      We should really start calling it the "Linux Evolution"! :)

    17. Re:But I'm confused. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll begin there, but end once their kids try to use LINUX in corporate america (where Linux is miles behind overall vs. Windows)? Things will change that tune, in a hurry:

      After all - What do you run into in business primarily as the OS & Office Suites in use?

      Answer = Microsoft Windows + Microsoft Office.

      It's been this way for decades and it's going to be the ultimately determining factor.

      Plus, most of the software out there is for Windows, NOT for Linux. Especially @ the hardware peripherals level (drivers).

      This includes device driver support straight from the OEM/manufacturer of a peripheral, & what do they build for first, primarily?? Windows!

      This is simply because MS stuff is the most used.

      This creates an instant large market for them selling their hardware, this widespread use of Windows.

      (& it's one Linux can't match).

      Hey - We all have been hearing for nearly 15 years now how "this is the year of Linux" but, no dice to date.

      Hype/Propoganda/F.U.D. & other tactics Penguins use don't seem to work - market share, however, clearly does.

    18. Re:But I'm confused. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'd really like it if Linux wasn't always put on low end machines and viewed as a cheap alternative for doing basic things. It should be viewed as a high end desktop/server that's very powerful (which is the truth).

      The truth is that Linux is a cheap alternative for doing basic things, and a high end desktop/server OS, and an excellent embedded system, and the basis for thin clients, and...

      Linux could serve practically every niche.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  106. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The number one application in America, after all, is e-mail.

    I think you misspelled "pr0n" there.

  107. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by aichpvee · · Score: 0, Troll

    And when they get home they won't care. Seriously, for what most people do on their computers ANYTHING will do these days. Hell, BSD would probably work for these people and I hear they just got a GUI last year or so!

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  108. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by sfjohnson · · Score: 1

    I just bought one of these for my in-laws for Christmas. Wal-Mart On-Line sent me an e-mail that the machine shipped today; it also arrived today. Up and running in ~5 minutes, works pretty well (keyboard is a p.o.s.). I'm writing this on the machine right now.

    This machine will be fine for my in-laws, who have never touched a computer before. I'm happy - $200 well spent.

    --
    Live in the Future; It's Just Starting Now!
  109. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by HW_Hack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Welcome to the global market - however I've never shopped WalMart - never will. Walmart is seeing and doing what Intel refuses to do or acknowledge ---- and that is that modern CPU's/Graphics/Memory are more than enough for the average user even if they want to do some very basic digital photos / video. I used to work at Intel -- this kind of stuff scares them shitless just like Linux scares M$ shitless. Intel is all about the next gen chips / architecture ... why ? Because those new CPUs sell for $800 -$999 each versus a last gen CORE chip for $125 or less. Those new chips are great if you have the need for the juice and the extra $$ for a top end PC. I would say less than 20% of the market really needs that level of power. But Intel and AMD are locked in a battle to produce hyper-sonic space planes --- average folks just need a basic jet plane. Add to this the market is fairly saturated with decent HW -- so unless you're a fortune 1000 company you probably don't need $1400 PCs. Also don't forget the "Google Factor" - if Google can successfully augment + cement the Linux OS - making the whole experience "pleasant" and easy to use ... they will have opened up another front against M$. Prediction --- if Walmart + Google can make 50% of these users happy (while also learning from their mistakes): the current model will drop to $150 - a new better $200 PC will appear - and probably a $250 PC. A $350 laptop may not be far behind. PS - In 2004 Intel set a target for 25% of ALL company positions to be in China, Asia, India by 2009.

    --
    Its not the years, its the mileage .....
  110. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just won't do it on a commie VIA chip.

    Sorry to rain on your rant, but you do know that VIA is a Taiwanese company... VIA Taiwan homepage. And in case I'm being too subtle, Taiwan isn't exactly a Communist country.

    Gee, Taiwan is really screwed, when even foes of China gets Taiwan and China mixed up, there's absolutely no chance that Taiwan is gonna be recognised as an independent country anytime soon.

    PS - You're also 30/40 years too late with that Red scare, try using the word "terrorism" instead.

  111. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Frogbert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow are you ever an ethnocentric prick. I guarantee you there is a significant percentage of Slashdot users who aren't even in a country that has Wal-mart stores.

  112. Excellent. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is excellent since it means that the PHBs at Walmart will notice that this product is a bestseller. That further means more cheap Linux PCs being made available and sold.

    All of this serves to bump up the percentage of computers sold with Linux versus Windows PCs and Macs. I imagine that it will serve mostly to take percentage points away from Windows, since the market share of Macs has only increased lately with the availability of Boot Camp, VMware Fusion, and Parallels.

    The extension of the above logic is one small increase in the snowball effect: More Linux PCs sold means pie charts in corporate meetings show less Windows market share coupled with increasing Linux market share. This lends additional credibility to the platform, besides the credibility it already has with support from all major computing companies except a certain behemoth from Washington state, and the reputation it already has as a platform with many choices and possibilities, rock-solid stability, and widespread use in servers. The additional credibility applies to the use of Linux on the desktop. This leads commercial developers to make more Linux software; both in turn lead to higher credibility for the system. Bottom line: Linux is chipping away, slowly but surely, at the market share, power, and revenue of the aforementioned behemoth.

    Google is a better company than Microsoft.

  113. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by jimfrost · · Score: 1
    The idea that a computer would not run that deer hunting game you also bought at Wal-Mart is alien to many of the people most likely to buy a $200 computer.

    How true this is. What's kind of funny is that I picked up a random cheap game at Staples the other day to run on my Windows box. It didn't work. Only works on XP, of course, and I run Vista on that thing. (I knew that was a risk, you just don't know until you try it.) From a consumer point of view it is frustrating either way.

    Although the lady I gave it to was happy to have SOMETHING, she wasn't very happy when she realized I'd just given her a lifestyle when she thought she was getting a computer.

    Hah, I've BTDT too, although with Macs rather than Linux boxes. Unless you're planning to run games there is really little difference in the function of Windows, Linux, or MacOS; they all can do the job, they all have quirks that mean some stuff won't run on them or will run only if you know the right magic incantations. Windows is only a win in that there are a lot more knowledgeable people around.

    What it came down to for me was the ongoing support effort. Windows PCs always mean significant ongoing effort. Things just go inscrutably wrong with them, and debugging over the phone with a neophyte just plain sucks ... especially when the only viable solution is almost certainly going to be "back up what you can and reinstall". (Or buy a whole new PC.) It's way harder to corrupt a Mac, and while they too have weird problems on occasion I haven't yet run into one that required a full reinstall (not even the oh-so-pleasant "I disabled admin access on the only admin account" problem with recent Leopard installs). It can be annoying, but it's annoying with a low periodicity rather than being near-constant.

    So in the case where I'm supplying the PC or supporting the PC I recommend Macs. Lots of commercial software and low low support costs. I have had people who weren't always happy about that, but they get a lot of stuff done in between minor bouts of frustration due to compatibility issues and it's not like they weren't going to have plenty of frustrations with the Windows box too, just different (and more serious) ones.

    I also really like it when they buy a new Mac and get to do the "transfer stuff from the old Mac". It's so easy it always amazes me. Makes me all the angrier at Microsoft, actually, because there's no reason Windows couldn't do the same thing except for that goddamn registry.

    (I did the Linux desktop and laptop thing for years myself before giving up and buying Macs for that kind of stuff. It works, but it's more effort than it's worth. Love it on my servers though ... cheap and effective and also really easy to move an old system to a new one. We really only have Windows boxes for running games, and for that I can treat them as disposable.)

    --
    jim frost
    jimf@frostbytes.com
  114. Re:Oh get real by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    Cool, thanks for the info; sounds like a pretty good deal for a basic server box.

  115. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by MoogMan · · Score: 1

    That a Linux machine is sold out at Walmart suggests that plain folks -- not like you and me -- know and respect Linux.

    On the contrary, it seems to suggest that the average consumer really doesn't give a crap about what OS they use, as long as it works sufficiently well (but how do you know until you buy it; at which point, "sufficiently well" is reduced to "works enough times such that it doesn't warrant being taken back"). It suggests that the average consumer eats what it is fed.

    Linux certainly works "sufficiently well". It is no longer about software developers - what we make is good enough - it is about marketing.

  116. Re:laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next G4 mini auction I see ending on ebay is up to $227.50 with 10 hours left. Many other G4 minis ending later are even higher, so I bet it'll get to at least $300 before it's sold.

    You've actually made your argument worse: not only is an ebay'd G4 mini still not "cheaper than" the Walmart $200 Linux PC, but a used G4 doesn't "come with support from apple himself".

    Plus if "all [your] friends say wow when they see" a used G4 you bought on ebay, you have really lame friends.

    P.S., please respond. Each of your responses so far has made me think "he couldn't possibly be any stupider", and I'm wondering how you're going to outdo yourself now.

  117. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    Remember, these are typical Walmart customers here.
    In small town America, everyone shops at Wal-Mart. Factory workers, office workers, small business owners, doctors, lawyers, even the geeks that live there.

    How many of these people are expected to have DSL or Cable instead of dial-up?


    Considering how heavily the phone companies and cable companies advertise their DSL and high speed internet packages, more than you might think. I've had broadband for over 5 years

    How many are going to be returned because they don't have MS Office pre-installed on them?


    Wouldn't Wal-Mart customers as you describe them, not need Microsoft Office?

  118. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by kylehase · · Score: 1

    Well it is a warning. Remember, not everyone is a Slashdot reader. Many customers will see a PC and automatically assume it's a Windows PC because they have no idea there are alternatives. They'll think that they can run the software which is probably sitting on the shelf just behind this computer because it says "PC" on the box regardless of the preceding word "Windows". Oh wait, I'm sure the Walmart checkout person will know that the two are incompatible and inform the customer.

    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
  119. What are some nice cheap, low power choices by btempleton · · Score: 1

    One of the things that was tempting about this machine was its low power consumption and cheap price. I would have put regular ubuntu on it and used it as a household always-up server and mythtv main backend. I have a regular machine doing that, which draws more like 100 watts, and dropping to 25 watts actually means quite a bit of saving, with electricity costing 31 cents/kwh as it does for most of us in California once you get to 2x baseline.

    So are there some other choices of low-price, low wattage systems that have the basics:

    a) 2-3 PCI slots (for tv tuner cards and an extra ethernet)
    b) Drive bays (for fileserver for use in backup by other systems)
    c) USB 2 (for driving printers and perhaps USB hard drives)

    A laptop is very low wattage (with built in UPS) but of course does not have slots or drive bays.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  120. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    These PC's are putting people out of business.

    And there was me thinking for all of these years that the whole idea of a capitalist economy is that you stay in business because you remain competitive - ipso facto, when you are no longer competitive or produce products not or no longer wanted by the consumer, then you go out of business.

    So before you go and cheer on our new communist rulers take into account that sometimes it's not such a bad idea to drop a few bucks on an Intel chip.

    Actually, I think you'll find that it's "traditional" for Communist governments to "shore up" their own favoured industries with subsidies and trade restrictions in order to force the consumer to buy from a specific vendor. This is precisely what you are saying should happen if a Taiwanese company like Via cannot be fairly allowed to compete with an American company like Intel.

    Anyway, enjoy your -1 Troll - you earnt it!

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  121. This is Huge News by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1

    Having a Linux based PC with mass market distribution at a price point that is not attainable by Widows based machines is going to have a dramatic impact on the whole OS market.

    I'm not saying things will change over night, but at this point in time, with Vista floundering and consumer response to the linux product high, Microsoft is in trouble in the workstation market. As these are very low-end machines, these will likely become popular with students and children. The more market share Linux attains, the greater the support and commercial software options available. As children and student become accustomed to Linux they will have no issues using it in future environments. As the workstation OS market fragments, the lock on using MS Office Suite for compatibility purposes will start to decline as more and more people use alternates and compatibility issues arise no matter what is in use. If Microsoft was smart, they would be developing a Microsoft Office for Linux, and keeping it in their back pocket until it is needed.

    The fact that this is made possible, and being driven by Walmart is sweet irony, but this will be a Harvard Case Study in a few years about the power of distribution channels, and how Microsoft lost its position as king of the desktop.

    Interesting times.

    1. Re:This is Huge News by Darundal · · Score: 1

      The operating system one uses as a child isn't necessarily the operating system one uses as an adult. Most of the schools I went to as a kid had (not at the time) old macs. I hated them, ended up being a Windows user for a brief "dark" period (long enough to get me addicted to the games, however) and then migrated to Linux, which is overall,for me, not a pain in the ass.

  122. Cocktail Waitress?? by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    Thank you, thank you - I'm here every night. Be sure to tip your cocktail waitress.


    I have my own cocktail waitress??? Why did no one tell me this?!?!
    1. Re:Cocktail Waitress?? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      She died from neglect a few years back and nobody head the heart to tell you.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  123. WTF is gOS? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    I bet a clone of Ubuntu, but what are the key differences, and why such a horrible name?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:WTF is gOS? by littlefoo · · Score: 1

      I bet a clone of Ubuntu, but what are the key differences,
      Wow - great guess, wonder how you managed that ? If you got that far then perhaps you could have looked a little closer and actually read something for yourself. If Google is a little beyond you here is a helper
      http://www.thinkgos.com/index.html

      and why such a horrible name?

      *shrug* One mans wart..

      The starting 'g' may be a hint and if you look at, hmmmm let me think - almost any of the news about gOS that may be a bigger help.

      Sorry to come across rude mate - but if you want to know a bit why don't you just get off your arse and have at least a cursory look ?

    2. Re:WTF is gOS? by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, qOS is Ubuntu with Enlightment as the default window manager.

      It is also set up for a load of WebApps by default.

      It's designed to run on low-level PCs. LifeHacker had a nice article about using it to revitalize your old PC.

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    3. Re:WTF is gOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can find out a lot of helpful information here: http://www.fuckinggoogleit.com/

  124. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by kylehase · · Score: 1

    Your arguments over exaggerated. Think of the most computer illiterate person you know. Would they ever confuse a microwave with a Windows PC? Seriously. The problem is that this thing looks exactly like all other Windows PCs on the outside and many people never heard of Linux so they may assume it's like all the other PCs. Now your point about the Mac is valid but with Apple's aggressive marketing they've distanced themselves with Windows so greatly that anyone who watches TV at least in the US knows that they're "different" and would be likely to ask the salesperson if __software will run. For those people who lined up for this thing, I'm sure they knew what they got and they would probably would have just laughed at the sign.

    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
  125. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    "patronized by people who know little about calculus or physics."
    Maybe in America, but Canada also has Wal-Mart stores, so not all their customers are dumb, eh...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  126. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by BarlowBrad · · Score: 1

    That a Linux machine is sold out at Walmart suggests that plain folks -- not like you and me -- know and respect Linux. The lesson is that there is a ready market, in middle America, for Linux-based applications. Don't flame me, but I don't believe that's the case. I think a much more likely reason these PCs sold out was because they appealed to two types of people:
    1) Linux Geeks ("geek" in the best possible connotation)
    2) Cheap PC shoppers ("cheap" meaning inexpensive)

    In all actuality, I bet people bought this PC not because Linux applications appealed to them, but because it was only $200.
  127. Good evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dib: I just know he's up to something! Something ... evil!
    Mortos: Mortos like evil.
    Dib: No, no. This is bad evil.
    Mortos: Oh.

  128. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by reidconti · · Score: 1

    Never have, never will. Sure, their business practices suck, but I just won't support a company that exerts so much control over industries that could do without their meddling -- witness Wal-Mart demanding and creating a market for censored music when its not what most of their customers want, but many of them do not have a choice.

  129. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by itsthebin · · Score: 1

    Bah.
    The only time in my life I have shopped at walmart was once in Guiyang, China - ( they had western scotch )
    Cheap Chinese labour for the products , and cheap Chinese labour for the staff ... does that make me "double evil" ?

    --
    ...I obey the laws of physics....
  130. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by rucs_hack · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many AOL users even know what an OS is ??

    They know exactly what an OS is, it's the blue window that tells them they've got mail, duh..

  131. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    I guarantee you almost everyone on Slashdot shops at Wal-Mart

    Well, I'd be delighted to shop at Wal-Mart, but the closest one is roughly 3,000 miles away...

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  132. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 1

    No, trust me, you wouldn't. Seeing the people who shop there is bad enough, but then dealing with their shit quality products is even worse. I'll never shop there again, mainly due to their abusive labor tactics, but also because they don't sell anything that won't break after a few weeks of use.

  133. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Monkey-some · · Score: 1

    well I would put it in a different perspective : That 200$ computers running Linux sells so well in a market were the general technology awareness is low only proves that people don't really mind about the operating system but rather want something to go on the Internet, get emails and write a letter from time to time.

  134. On the other side of the pond by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

    The ASUS 701 Eee became recently available at €354 (inc VAT), which is the equivalent of $200 over here.

    It pretty much sold out instantly. I bought one and five people I know bought one, and everyone is constantly monitoring 'Order Tracking' pages.

    When you consider that this at a time when Linux is 'not suitable' for the desktop and for which there is 'very little demand' - I would have to believe that Microsoft and their FUD-spinners must be very concerned.

    We should not be in any doubt, notwithstanding Linux's inherent brilliance, that the price is a major factor in the success of these new machines. But it must not be forgotten that Linux has two major advantages over Windows for price competitiveness:

    1. Linux runs much better on entry-level or obsolete hardware.
    2. Linux is free.

    Microsoft might be able to address the second point. But they have shown release after release that the first point is beyond their ability. Now they have a double edge sword at their throats, in that every release of Windows must demand more and more from the hardware manufacturers just to stand still - while Linux soaks up that capacity to race ahead.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    1. Re:On the other side of the pond by bn0p · · Score: 1

      Sorry - but where do you live and when did you do the currency conversion?? The US dollar is not doing well right now.

      As of 11/13/2007, the US dollar is only 0.685 of a Euro.

      That means €354 is almost $517 US dollars - not exactly equivalent (although to be fair the Eee comes with a screen and keyboard).

      --
      Never let reality temper imagination
    2. Re:On the other side of the pond by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he's not talking about US dollars. If he was, why would he quote the Euro price and then give a conversion? The Eee is sold by a number of US retailers for $399. I know it sold out quickly most places, but NewEgg is showing it in stock again. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220244
      (If I had the money to buy one, there's no way I'd post this till I had my order in.)

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    3. Re:On the other side of the pond by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

      I more meant that the cheapest you would get any PC for here would be €300, (though you could probably get a dell for about €150 - but that has no keyboard, screen, mouse, software, support, case etc...) and I presume that the Walmart PC is pretty much the bottom of the market too (price not quality).

      [I also wanted a smug gloat about the Eee that I'm supposed to be getting before Friday :D ]

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    4. Re:On the other side of the pond by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      Yeah I'm in the UK And I'd love to be able to buy a PC for £100 quid. ($200) . The EEE PC is £199 ($400). Dell sell a couple for around £200. Oh and is ASDA walmart, or what?

    5. Re:On the other side of the pond by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain.

      --
      Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  135. Why Enlightenment with Ubuntu? by DrXym · · Score: 1
    The whole point of Ubuntu is to present a simple user interface centered around GNOME. It doesn't need a fancy WM since the whole point is the desktop is a seamless, simple and unobtrusive experience.

    What purpose does Enlightenment serve in all this? I wouldn't ever describe Enlightenment as seamless, simple or unobtrusive. E appears to be about eye candy for eye candy's sake and that's about it.

  136. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by captainwisdom · · Score: 1

    Wow are you a carbonocentric prick. I guarantee you there are hordes of silicon-based aliens shopping at wal-mart (when we're sleeping). How do you think they got so big...

  137. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    but when I upgraded to Kubuntu 7.10 my modem that has had zero support forever was suddenly recognized and had a driver available. So maybe things have improved...
    Same thing happened here (although I still have no use for it).
    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  138. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    and would be likely to ask the salesperson if __software will run.
    Which the sales person will then respond that because of Bootcamp, you can.
    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  139. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by ryanov · · Score: 1

    How small does this small town have to be? I grew up in a small town, and I don't personally know anyone from there who shops at one.

  140. Via chipsets by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take this with a grain of salt, as I last actually played with 3d graphics on a VIA board sometime ago. Years back, the drivers were a royal PAIN in the butt to get working, but nowadays there's acceleration built into the kernel if I remember correctly. In either case, the 3d acceleration is decent enough to play neverball, and I've never had any issues playing DVD's, DivX movies, and using TV out etc on my 1GHZ Epia M10000 (that is, until it blew a capacitor).

    As to Warcraft III, I couldn't comment. Back when it first came it, I had little luck getting it to work in Cedega and Wine didn't do the copy-protection thing very well. This may be due to lack of nice support between Cedega and the VIA chipsets, though, rather than a lack of power in the chip itself.

    Don't expect it to play any newer games, but the simple 3d stuff works just fine.

    1. Re:Via chipsets by bynary · · Score: 1

      Hey, my 1GHz Epia M10000 just blew a capacitor over the weekend. I was in the process of getting it setup with Ubuntu for my kids. I was not a happy camper. I know this is a little off-topic, but can those things be fixed/replaced? Not much of a hardware nerd, but I'm not afraid to tinker if it's possible.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    2. Re:Via chipsets by argiedot · · Score: 1

      I have a VIA P4M800, or something similar. The onboard graphics is a Unichrome which shares 1-64MB RAM. You can play Warcraft III over Wine with 8MB set in the BIOS to the onboard, but it looks better if you play in Windows (the driver must be missing something, or wine is).

    3. Re:Via chipsets by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Short answer is... kinda.

      I replaced mine and it worked for awhile, but then died again (not sure why). You can give it a shot, since caps are cheap. Basically you need to find caps with the same rating, clip the existing ones so there's some stalk above the board, and then solder a new cap onto the remnants of the old stalk.

      Sadly, it seems that VIA uses (or at least used to use, not sure about current) inferior caps, as I had an M10000 and an M10000-2 (or whatever the one with the PCMCIA slot is) fry over the summer. If you're replacing it, I'd look into the Jetway boards with VIA CPU's (but watch for the TV-Out/Firewire, not all of those have 'em onboard if you need them). I used to use the VIA boards as low-power webservers, now I'm running Jetway boards with 1.5GHZ C7 CPUs and Dual 1GB LANs. They're a bit flakey until you update the firmware, but after that they run wonderfully.

    4. Re:Via chipsets by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I replaced mine and it worked for awhile, but then died again (not sure why). You can give it a shot, since caps are cheap. Basically you need to find caps with the same rating, clip the existing ones so there's some stalk above the board, and then solder a new cap onto the remnants of the old stalk.

      If you're going to solder, you might as well do it properly. Extra long wires will add a little inductance, which effectively reduces capacitance. You need a little patience melting the old solder, since it has a higher than usual melting point. I've replaced a lot of caps on my MII-10000 (the one with PC Card and CF slots) and eventually it's been working fine. Last time I replaced some caps was in the summer of 2006, and the machine is running 24/7 as a server.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Via chipsets by evilviper · · Score: 1

      how effective are the 3D drivers for the onboard Via Video chip.

      For info about 3D under Linux, there are only a handful of places to go. NVidia, ATI, and Intel's sites contain drivers and info on their chipsets.

      If yours isn't covered by those, however, there is only one other other place to go, that is DRI: http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Status

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  141. umm is it really sold out? by atarione · · Score: 1

    cause i just looked on wal-mart's site and it says it is in stock..

    not that i would buy it ..or anything else from wal-mart...

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
  142. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by complete+loony · · Score: 1

    Wow are you ever an insensitive clod. I guarantee you there is a significant percentage of Slashdot readers who aren't even users. Or people for that matter.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  143. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by rts008 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That would be a little like a Mazda RX7 having a warning that this is not a Dump Truck.

    There, fixed that for you.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  144. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Selling PCs without an operating system would not make sense, and might even get them into legal trouble...

    Legal trouble? There is no conceivable legal case to be made here. MS have always used financial pressure (discounts on Windows OEM licenses etc.) to stop significant retailers from selling OS-free PCs. They have never threatened any of the smaller retailers who already sell OS-free machines.

    They HAVE whinged about the issue and I'm sure they would get a suitable law passed if they could. But they realize that if they go too far on this issue, competition authorities (especially in the EU) will potentially prevent them making the Windows-only agreements with the larger retailers.

  145. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    This whole process of bloated operating systems (OSes) driving purchases of even more excessive amounts of hardware is a damned waste of money.

    I don't know about you guys, but GAMING is what's driving my purchases of even more excessive amounts of hardware.

  146. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by montyzooooma · · Score: 1

    Remember, these are typical Walmart customers here. So pretty much anybody. Well, probably not millionaires but most of them are incapable of doing anything for themselves so you don't want to give one of them a linux PC. But millionaires aside I think the demographics for Walmart shoppers, computer users and even linux users and windows users are pretty much identical. People.
  147. OK, that's the OS running by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now run a program that uses the OS...

    Oh, they are apps from three years ago.

    Which would run on Win9x and would run faster because the OS wasn't taking so much memory and CPU realestate.

  148. Specs useless for Vista? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When nearly all PCs sold in the world until last spring are unusable with Vista, I'd call Vista useless for that specs, not the other way around. C'mon people! There are millions of productive users who can do their work on 3 years old machines. I just installed Ubuntu (for teaching purposes, I'm a Debian user) on an old Athlon XP 1800+ (clocked at 1.3 GHz, IIRC) with 512 megs of RAM and a stone age Nvidia 5200 video card and a 80G old IBM hard disk. Openoffice, a really heavy app in its field, is perfectly useable and Compiz, the spectacular rotating thing that surpassed Aero in every field, just screams at 1280x1024.
    Why one should change his hardware because at Microsoft they can't pay developers to optimize their software?

  149. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by kklein · · Score: 1

    Indeed. I almost mentioned that. It's a pretty decent machine for $200. Who cares what's installed?

  150. Why their computer does not connect to TVs by master_p · · Score: 1

    Many TVs today can easily show a 800x600 desktop which is affordable for work. If this computer had a VGA which could connect directly to a TV, there wouldn't be a need to buy a monitor...it would be something like the home computers of the 80s, but with a real operating system and very good software behind it.

    1. Re:Why their computer does not connect to TVs by Hatta · · Score: 1

      It's a real pain to view text on an interlaced TV. TV out is great for games and videos, but not acceptable for any sort of productivity. Flicker flicker flicker.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Why their computer does not connect to TVs by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Many TVs today can easily show a 800x600 desktop which is affordable for work.

      Standard definition NTSC TVs have a maximum resolution of 704x480, and most of that is cropped off. PAL TVs are 704x576 but at a 20% lower frequency (refresh rate). But even more than that, the picture is interlaced, and the dot pitch is large. That means you need a huge font to be able to read still text on a TV screen (while tiny text is readable on a monitor) and it's still not a present experience.

      It worked with old computers because 80x24 text was a enough resolution. Text was vastly over scanned, overcoming the limitations of TVs.

      With new HDTVs, CRTs are still almost always interlaced, Plasma is subject to burn-in. And even if you have an LCD HDTV, do you really want to hog your $1,000 HDTV with computer use, in order to save $100 on a monitor?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  151. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by juanfgs · · Score: 0

    I'm seeing a lot of this kind of comments recently on Slashdot, of people blindingly sayin "commie" to everyone (and not as a joke), It's kind of creepy that many people are thinking like 40 years ago.

  152. Via is from Taiwan moron...Taiwan isnt commie by voss · · Score: 2, Informative

    The last time I checked Taiwan is a multiparty democratic capitalist country with a
    GDP per capita of $29,600. The only people who claim Taiwan is part of PRC is the PRC
    and people who dont know geography

    They do have factories in China just like every american manufacturer but the
    corporation and the chips are from Taiwan.

  153. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the target market for this machine "people who are just smart enough to pirate XP"?

    As in "Wow, what a cheap computer. If I buy that, I'm only paying for the hardware!"

    It's not surprising that it has sold well. And since the machine is usable "as sold", thanks to the Linux software, Microsoft has no way to complain. Everybody wins except Microsoft :).

  154. What about GPUs? by juanfgs · · Score: 0

    I wonder why nobody includes low end GPUs on economic machines, recently I bought a NVIDIA 7100 GS, card for $190 (that would be like 61 US dollars, which is really expensive as I've seen them at 30 US dollars). And it runs pretty nice, the box says that is Vista compatible (not that I care, but maybe Joe Sixpack would). It can run Compiz-Fusion really fast, and I can even play Quake Wars with medium settings. If they bundled that kind of GPUs (from NVIDIA or ATI) on these machines it would be still cheaper than other PCs and also it could be used for a little better gaming.
    For the country I live in it would raise the price too much, but maybe for US folks it wouldn't be a problem.

  155. wal mart bad by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    how about locking overnight cleaning crews in the store, so they can't get out
    how about all the sex discrminationn law suits
    how about no health insurance, while the walton family has close to a 100 billion in stock
    how about all the mom and pops with small stores who don't have a decent retirement cause wal mart destroyed them
    how about the damage to our environment due to a car based store model(this is a little to sophisticted for /., you don't have to reply
    how about...and that is just off the top of my head, without even trying

    like any major corporation, walmart is bad because major corporations care only about profit; it is in their dna, they can't help it - any large corporation would bid on zyklon if it was profitable, that iswhy we have goverment, to help protect us from large corporations
    the 15 scariest words int eh english language - we are a large company, and there is no govt regultor loooking over our sholder

    1. Re:wal mart bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about locking overnight cleaning crews in the store, so they can't get out
      how about all the sex discrminationn law suits
      how about no health insurance, while the walton family has close to a 100 billion in stock
      how about all the mom and pops with small stores who don't have a decent retirement cause wal mart destroyed them
      how about the damage to our environment due to a car based store model(this is a little to sophisticted for /., you don't have to reply
      how about...and that is just off the top of my head, without even trying

      1. Strange, all the Walmarts around my area are open 24/7. Hard to lock in workers while locking out customers.
      2. America is over litigious as a whole, and every large company deals with the same. More of an indicator of human nature
      than corporate evil imo.
      3. One has nothing to do with the other. If health insurance is a priority for someone, they should look for a different place of employment.
      4. Capitalism and the free market. And I'm sure the 'mom and pop' store didn't offer it's employees health insurance either.
      5. You're right, I don't understand what a 'car based store model' is. Guess I'm just not that "sophisticated"...
      6. Yeah, maybe you *should* try next time.

  156. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    When I say that I'd be delighted to go there, I'm not saying that I'd actually be delighted to go there, it's just a way to say I couldn't go there even if I wanted to.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  157. I guess.... by tkid · · Score: 1

    I'm missing out since I don't shop at Wal-Mart, but then again, real techies build their own machines instead of buying them at retailers like Wally World. Just remember, you too can afford a $200.00 computer when it only cost Wal-Mart $50 to make, that includes the $2.00 slave wages they pay the 10 year old Chinese kid in China working 16 hour days for 10 cents an hour. It's probably pumped full of lovely toxins as well.. ;)

    1. Re:I guess.... by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      I'm missing out since I don't shop at Wal-Mart, but then again, real techies build their own machines instead of buying them at retailers like Wally World. Just remember, you too can afford a $200.00 computer when it only cost Wal-Mart $50 to make, that includes the $2.00 slave wages they pay the 10 year old Chinese kid in China working 16 hour days for 10 cents an hour. It's probably pumped full of lovely toxins as well.. ;)


      so... $2.00 in wages, at $0.10/hour.... you honestly think this machine took 20 hours to build? This is Linux. There's no Windows Update you need to do after installing.
      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    2. Re:I guess.... by tkid · · Score: 1

      The supervisors with whips and chains get a portion of the slave wages as well.. ;)

  158. Is LINUX Spanish for 'Free PC' ?? by HomeLights · · Score: 0

    I live in Florida with a lot of Hispanic populus many of whom do shop at WallyWorld. Does LIUNX mean something in Spanish I am not aware of? I agree that once Windows users who have no clue, try to run Windows programs they will be returning them in droves. Feliz Navidad

    --
    Stop by and watch a Christmas movie, commercial or cartoon! -->http://www.XmasDVD.com
  159. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    "I guarantee you there is a significant percentage of Slashdot users who aren't even in a country that has Wal-mart stores."

    I am not sure about that... I am brazilian, and not in that group. There is a Wallmart near where I live.

    Personaly, I don't like to buy there, but I'd go if they were selling that computer. Perfect home server, can even plug it on the wall and not be afraid of lightning storms (that are too common in Brazil).

  160. The business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walmart Customer: "I bought this computer, and I'm trying to load this game, but it doesn't work. Can you help me?"

    Techie: "Your game won't install because the computer is not running Windows."

    Walmart Customer: "But it's a PC!"

    Techie: "Yes, but it's not a Windows PC."

    Walmart Customer: "What's Windows?"

    Techie: "Windows is an operating system. It costs money. To save money, they've installed Linux on this machine. Linux is free, and really good, but it's not compatible with all Windows software."

    Walmart Customer: "So they've sold me a cheap PC ripoff?"

    Techie: "No, you've got what you paid for. If you want to buy Windows for this machine, you can, but it'll cost you a few hundred dollars extra."

    Walmart Customer: "They did rip me off. They said it was a PC, but it's not!"

    Techie: "No, it is a PC. It is not a Windows PC. There is a difference."

    Walmart Customer: "For fucks sake, I can't be bothered to understand what you are saying. Can you fix it or not?"

    Techie: "If you want, you can return it and buy another PC, one that does have Windows, but that will cost maybe twice as much."

    Walmart Customer: "But I don't understand the difference! What is this Linux thing? Why can't you just make it work?"

    Techie: "Ok, if you want, I'll install this pirate copy of Windows and then you can play your game. Ok?"

    Walmart Customer: "Whatever, just make it work. This is giving me a headache, I'm going to lie down."

    1. Re:The business model by mehemiah · · Score: 1

      So, what idiot bought a game for the pc without reading the system specs?

  161. better than the laptop? by smithcl8 · · Score: 1

    How is this is a better deal than the $350 laptop they had a couple weeks ago? My sister got one of those...1 Gig RAM, 1.8 GHz Celeron processor (I believe), built-in Wi-Fi. For $150 more, she got a helluva lot more system, plus Vista that she can remove if she wants. Frankly, she just wants on the Internet anyway, so Vista will stay, but the $150 extra seems clearly worth it.

  162. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... How many other /. readers are from VT.? We held off Wal-Mart for years and continue to fight them at the state level. I have only been inside one to protest... There is only one Wal-Mart within a day drive of my house, and neither myself or any of my neighbors would ever go there to shop. Please remember that not everyone on this site comes from sold-out/corn-bread America.

  163. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or on the other hand, if you had no knowledge of computers and walked into a store only to see a machine for $200 and right next to it the same machine for $500-$700 which would you buy?
    Your figures are greatly exaggerated. Even in rip off britan XP home/vista home basic (which are the editions are a cheap shit box would come with) whitebox OEM are arround £50 ($100) including VAT (our equivilent of sales tax), it is widely believed that the big brand OEMs pay even less.

    The problem is that the same time Joe Average is picking out that computer they are also looking at the software shelf loaded with Microsoft centric crap. The moment they pick up that shareware disk for $5.00 and ask, "will this work on that box I'm buying?" will be the kiss of death on that sale. Add in the fact that sales people at WalMart aren't the pick of the crop and mess up even Windows technical issues and it is a recipe for a PR disaster.
    Agreed, selling linux succesfully requires educating the buyer that it is not windows and what it's advantages (zero cost, less vulnerability to shitware, availibility of a lot of very good free software from the distros repositries) and disadvantages (inability to run the software they are used too and they see on the shelves in every computer related shop, lack of availibility of support from your more geeky but still MS using friends) are and letting them make an informed choice. Sadly this is hard when they don't even know what an OS is.

    Tricking people into buying linux when it is not right for them will only breed resentment, especilly when they have to pay three times as much to buy windows after the fact as they would have to buy it with the PC.

    I would only reccomend linux on the desktop to anybody if I knew appropriate software for the tasks in hand was availible and either:
    * I was going to be supporting it
    * I knew someone with appropriate linux knowlage was arround to support it.
    * The box was being used for a very limited set of tasks with little prospect that it was going to be used for more

    Also even if I reccomended linux on the desktop if I thought there was a reasonable (more than 1 in 3) chance the box will ever be used for something requiring windows then I would have to reccomend getting the windows license anyway due to the aforementioned huge price differential between OEM and retail (afaict most if not all windows volume licences are upgrade/downgrade only).

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  164. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by t35t0r · · Score: 1

    Wow, are you ever an elitist prick. I guarantee you almost everyone on Slashdot shops at Wal-Mart,

    Haven't stepped foot in a Walmart in over a year. Clothes and home stuff at Target, food at Kroger, office stuff at Staples, Officemax, or Office Depot, car stuff at Autozone or OReilly, everything else online (not at Walmart.com).

  165. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    I am. Well, until about a year ago, when Wal-Mart Germany closed shop and sold its assets to Metro. At least in Germany there aren't any Wal-Marts anymore (and they never really were much of a competitor to supermarkets run by more local corps like Edeka, Rewe or Metro, not to mention the omnipresent Aldi).

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  166. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by fprintf · · Score: 1

    I disagree with this. As others have noted, I think a significant portion of unknowing people have bought these expecting them to run Windows and will quickly discover otherwise.

    The upside is that some proportion of these people will stick with Linux and there will be some new influx of newbie users. You are right, of course, that for those who stick it out that they will be able to do the usual stuff just fine.

    I am reminded, of course, about how useful my first computer was when I got it home. It did nothing on its own. At 12 or 13 years old I had to have my Dad drive me back to the store to buy a book on BASIC to learn how to use the thing. These computers are a whole heck of a lot nicer than that!

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
  167. suprise by kurtis25 · · Score: 1

    I think some folks are in for a surprise when their documents save to Google and they can't find them through my documents. That is unless there is an Open Office icon on the desktop. I think we are on the border of a time when any OS can be a success given a few things: 1) It has a word process that opens Word documents and the icon is on the desktop. 2) It has a web browser with an icon on the desktop. 3) It saves documents locally and on the web with one click. 4) It plays DVD, flash, mp3s. 5) It lets folks use their ipods. That being said I haven't actually used one of these but it looks like they may fit the bill of what my average friend and co-worker needs. I'm not sure about Ipods and saving documents locally and on the web but give it a few months and I hope it will.

    1. Re:suprise by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

      I think we are on the border of a time when any OS can be a success given a few things:
      1. It has a word process that opens Word documents and the icon is on the desktop.
        Google Docs supposedly opens Word documents, and I imagine one of the icons on the desktop opens Google Docs. I just don't know which without mousing over it.
      2. It has a web browser with an icon on the desktop.
        Firefox appears on this other screenshot. A Google search from the desktop or other icons like Wikipedia and Blogger should bring it up.
      3. It saves documents locally and on the web with one click.
        Again, this depends on Google Docs, but supposedly it can save locally, and it shouldn't take too many clicks.
      4. It plays DVD, flash, mp3s.
        As discussed and linked below, the OS bundled with the PC does play DVDs and mp3s. I saw no specific mention of Flash; but I can't imagine how the YouTube icon would work without it.
      5. It lets folks use their ipods.
        It certainly does, with an icon on the desktop!
      Looks like, for anyone with always-on internet, this should provide all the basics.
      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  168. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by penix1 · · Score: 1

    I don't think I am inflated on my price and this is why. It isn't just the OS that comes bundled with Microsoft systems sold in places like WalMart. You also get all the other timeout ware (aka trialware) as well as all sorts of other stuff pre-installed all ready for you to shell out more money once you get used to using it. This usually includes things like Norton's AV, Works or even a scaled down version of Office, some sort of video player, trial games galore, etc... If it was just the OS that was bundled I would agree that my price was inflated but it isn't. Funny thing is, even though most of it is trialware they still add the price in for them and people still pay for it.

    --
    This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
  169. My favorite part of the original article by fredg3 · · Score: 1
    My favorite part of the original article:

    Even at the low end, however, image is everything. The gPC is built using tiny components, but put inside a full-size case because research indicates that Wal-Mart shoppers are so unsophisticated they equate physical size with capability.
    Wow... that's classic.
  170. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    >Those are the kind of fucktard who need to be removed from the gene pool as they are too fucking stupid to even exist let alone use a computer.

    Funny, I feel the same way about people that use neologisms such as "fucktard".

  171. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by theaceoffire · · Score: 1

    O.O really?

    Thats like a city without a McDonalds...

    Inconceivable!

    --
    I steal signatures. This one used to be yours.
  172. DVD movie playing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it play DVD movies? Native Linux AND Windows do not play DVD movies, due to licensing of the codecs, or some other legal nonsense. You typically have to buy player software or it comes bundled with the hardware? This is simple for Windows. Does the DVD burner on this thing have bundled software for DVD movie playback?

    1. Re:DVD movie playing? by chefmonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does it play DVD movies?

      Yes.

  173. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Excelsior · · Score: 1

    Good point. I didn't intend to imply that Windows was a Lamborghini, trust me.

  174. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Threni · · Score: 1

    > That a Linux machine is sold out at Walmart suggests that plain folks -- not like you and me -- know and respect Linux.

    Pure speculation. For all you know, businesses who still run Windows 2000/XP are using them as a cheap source of hardware to stick their corporate disk images on.

  175. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

    Well, call me an elitist prick if you want to, but I despise shopping at Wal-Mart. Frankly, shopping at Wal-Mart is never a good experience for me and I can count the number of times I've been to my local Wal-Mart in the past year on one hand. And still have two fingers left over. Aside from the fact that the average Wal-Mart shopper is on the whole from a different socio-economic group than I, I tend to find it ridiculous that every time I go into a Wal-Mart, I have to spend 10 mintues waiting in a damn check out line. Even more ridiculous when you consider that it's likely 1:00 AM and I'm only there because it's the only store in town that's open 24 hours.

    --

    If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  176. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Dr.+Zim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know several millionaires. They got that way by not spending a dime more than they have to. Walmart fits nicely into their strategy.

    --
    (name withheld by request)
  177. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is an American site, created and hosted in America, and the majority of it's readers are Americans. Deal with it. There is nothing wrong in assuming in a post that it will be read by an American unless you're replying to someone and it's obvious from their post they aren't American. Loser anti-American trolls like yourself are laughable. This is an American site. Don't like it? Start your own. How about newsfornerds.imalittlebitch.co.uk?

  178. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember, these are typical Walmart customers here.

    I resent that incredibly racist and elitist statement. I may not be the "typical" WalMart customer, but I do shop there. I would be a fool to spend fifty dollars for a pair of jeans elsewhere when I can get a pair of Wranglers at Wal Mart for $12. I would be a fool to pay $8 for a big bottle of Listerine at Osco's ehen I can get the same bottle for half the price at Wal Mart.

    Is Wal Mart evil? Sure they are. ALL big corporations are evil. I'd rather spend ten bucks on a pair of sneakers made by child labor at WalMart than a pair of Nikes made by child labor at some high priced mall store.

    BTW, your ignorance is showing. They're not going to need that AOL CD; the internet works out of the box on a Linux computer, unlike Windows.

    -mcgrew

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  179. Oracle dream by stm2 · · Score: 1

    Is this the Network PC?
    Was Larry Ellison 10 years ahead?

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  180. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Tikkun · · Score: 1

    Shopping at Wal-Mart is great because it's got what plants crave, electrolytes.

  181. Cyrix IDT Via by VanderJagt · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this will start a more substantial return of Cyrix to the US desktop market. As I understand, Via has a bigger processor team from IDT than from Cyrix but more processor designs that are still currently usable from Cyrix. (I'd be interested if anyone else can inform me better on that.) I was a big fan of Cyrix during the 6x86 era, since the integer units were awesome on those chips.

  182. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    Two problems, Jose:

    1) Being American-centric is not the same as being 'ethnocentric.' Maybe a national reference where you are from is ethnocentric, but not here.

    2) Define 'significant.'

  183. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    I don't believe a lot of buyers were typical wal-mart customers.

    WM has then redefined it's 'typical' customer by expanding their product offerings, haven't they?

  184. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by iroll · · Score: 1

    Wow are you ever a touchy blowhard. In 'merica, "Wal-mart" has become a generic name for large discount stores... it could just as easily encompass Target, K Mart, or whatever your national flavor is. I'm sure your country, given that it obviously has some degree of internet access, also has discount stores.

    It's like him saying "Come off it, everybody drinks Coke," and you respond with "STFU, I drink Pepsi. We don't have Coke here."

    --
    Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
  185. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean "Tuche"?

    --
    Redundancy is good And also good.
  186. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bashing us over the head with our own inventions!

    So, which one of these inventions is yours?

  187. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    I agree with your premise, but not your examples. The Apple example was right on; but microwave? That's just silly. DVD player? That's equally silly (despite the fact that your DVD player as well as your digital watch are computers). A DVD player that would only play Sony DVDs would indeed need a warning.

    As to your car analogy, that's just stupid. They're both CARS, use the same gas, the same roads, and operate almost exactly the same.

    See what happens when you comment at slashdot after midnight? Get some rest, dude! Good point, bad examples.

    -mcgrew

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  188. Manufactured where? by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1


    I did a little googling & wikipedia-ing, and couldn't figure out where Centaur has their manufacturing facilities.

    Austin, TX?

    Taiwan?

    Communist China?

    1. Re:Manufactured where? by hitchhacker · · Score: 1
      It's right at the top of Wikipedia's VIA Page:

      VIA Technologies is a Taiwanese manufacturer of integrated circuits ... VIA conducts research and development of its chipsets in-house, then subcontracts the actual (silicon) manufacturing to third-party merchant foundries (such as TSMC.) Most likely TSMC, which is based mostly in Taiwan, but also has a fab near Portland.

      -metric
  189. Walmart still is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taking advantage of misinformed customers. They all probably assumed it had windows and that linux must have been some neato software.

    GOOD JOB WALMART

    1. Re:Walmart still is.... by cloakable · · Score: 1

      Well, they have it half right: Linux is a neat bit of software.

      --
      No tyrant thrives when every subject says no.
  190. OMG, I'd love to see that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Wow, I'd love to see the look on the face of some slackjawed yokel when he hooks up some Lunix machine. Can you imagine how funny it's going to be when he can't even get the GUI to come up without spending a half hour trying to edit the configuration files?

    And when he wants to install software on it... hilarity ensues!

    BWAHAHAHA!!! Teh Lunix strikes again!

    1. Re:OMG, I'd love to see that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm a slackjawed yokel and I run linux* on my John Deere tractor, you insensitive clod!

      *my own custom distro based on Slack. I call it "Slackjaw".

    2. Re:OMG, I'd love to see that by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      Reality ... it's such a hard concept.... The fact is, I installed Linux (from scratch) on my second machine. I didn't have to change any configuration files or actually do anything except let it install. Took about 10-15 minutes total. A Windows user friend of mine called me in panic. He had to reinstall Windows since he had a virus even though he had a firewall up and current AV software. He had reinstalled Windows which took him a couple of hours but he couldn't get to the internet to download drivers (one of which was for his network card). It took him most of the day to get it working. I'll bet it takes me less time to install Linux than it takes you to install your AV software and we are not even talking about getting updates.

  191. Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by spun · · Score: 1

    You young whippersnappers with your new-fangled IBM-XP computers. Why, when I was a lad, we did business on a TRS-80. Model I no less. My dad wrote a program to analyze Rorschach test scores on it. And get this: he sold it to a friend back in, oh, '85 I think, who used it for book keeping at his home business for the next ten years. That's right, this guy was keeping his books on a fricken' TRS-80 Model I in 1995.

    You kids these days...

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by bball99 · · Score: 1

      HA! you're so right... a friend of mine owned a breakfast/hoagie/deli restaurant... we used his cassette-driven TRS-80 Model 1 to track and predict how many subs we'd need to make up based on the day's weather pattern...

      worked pretty well, too! :-)

    2. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Er, the TRS-80 was out at the same time as the XT. Let me fix that for you:

      You young whippersnappers with your new-fangled IBM-XP computers. Why, when I was a lad, we did business on a PDP. Model I no less. My dad wrote a program to analyze Rorschach test scores on it. And get this: he sold it to a friend back in, oh, '85 I think, who used it for book keeping at his home business for the next ten years. That's right, this guy was keeping his books on a fricken' PDP-1 in 1995
      The funny thing is, there probably were people using PDPs in 1995!

      Even funnier, it would probably run Linux. I'm not sure about a beowolf cluster of them though.
      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by operagost · · Score: 1

      I know there were people using them in 2002. The company I was contracting with at the time had a PDP-11 in their disaster recovery facility for a client.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by Azarael · · Score: 1

      As the saying goes, "don't fix it if it ain't broke". Last I heard, there were still suppliers around making replacement parts for PDP's since they still used at power plants among other places.

    5. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by spun · · Score: 1

      The TRS-80 Model I came out in 1977, the XT came out in 83. We bought our TRS-80 in 1978. We got an expansion interface with floppy disk, a 300 baud modem, and a subscription to CompuServe in 1979. But I'd used a computer well before that, in 1975. A PDP, actually. I was all of five year old, my friend's dad was a comp-sci prof at the University of Nevada in Las Vegas, and he would set us down at his teletype, log us in, put us in a restricted shell and let us waste reams of paper playing games like hunt the wumpus, lunar lander, and colossal caves.

      So don't try to fix nothin' for me, newbie. You'll just break it. Now sitten backen unt watchen das blinkenlights. ;-)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    6. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by Ticklemonster · · Score: 0

      By god, when I was a kid, we played Wow on an abacus.

      --
      Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
    7. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by bennomatic · · Score: 1
      My father uses part of his old PDP-11; it's the case, in which he put rack shelves to house lots of X86 boxes.

      He consults for clients who use cyclotrons for medical purposes (think: generating tracers for use in PET/CAT scans); some time back, he had a client using a machine that had been controlled by a PDP-11, but that machine was getting less and less reliable. He found a nice PDP-11 emulator, dedicated a Windows box to running it, and bingo, he had a nice new controller for his client.

      Good times.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    8. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      So don't try to fix nothin' for me, newbie. You'll just break it. Now sitten backen unt watchen das blinkenlights. ;-)

      Hey, geezers are SUPPOSED to have bad memories. But I was 12 when I met my first computer in 1964.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    9. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      As the saying goes, "don't fix it if it ain't broke". Last I heard, there were still suppliers around making replacement parts for PDP's since they still used at power plants among other places.

      I wonder if Springfield's power plant uses antique computers? I'm thinking it must be an old computer from a 1960s science fiction movie or TV show, since the thing BLEW UP Saturday night!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    10. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by Azarael · · Score: 1

      Yikes :-S I thought you meant Springfield as in the Simpsons. There's officially to many Springfields in the US.

    11. Re:Ob. Old Geezer Thread to Follow by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Actually, this Springfield is even more cartoonish than the TV Springfield. One of our Aldermen is Gail Simpson. Todd Renfrow, the guy in charge of our power plant, is a dead ringer for Mr. Burns (he's the guy in front of the giant check, on the right). Betty Boop lives here, Popeye, Olive, Bluto and Brutis all live here, although the Spriingfield Betty Boop's head is bigger, and Springfield's Olive Oyl is flatter chested. Many of our denizens are bugeyed (although not all of them).

      here is a tale of some of our trolls. here are a lot more Springfield stories, all true, few believable.

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  192. Re:You get what you paid for by pipatron · · Score: 1

    What issues did you have with Ubuntu that Windows 2000 solved?

    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  193. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Excelsior · · Score: 1

    A DVD player that would only play Sony DVDs would indeed need a warning.
    Hmm. BetaMax didn't have a warning. Nor do HD-DVD or BluRay players warn that they don't play the competing formats. Again, buyer beware.

    As to your car analogy, that's just stupid. They're both CARS, use the same gas, the same roads, and operate almost exactly the same.
    Linux and Windows are both OPERATING SYSTEMS, use the same electric from my wall, the same Internet, and operate much the same. I wasn't nearly as comfortable with my analogy until you helped to flesh it out.

    See what happens when you comment at slashdot after midnight? Get some rest, dude! Good point, bad examples.
    You sound kind of pissy yourself.

  194. It's online these days. by norminator · · Score: 1

    A large part of the utility of this gOS PC is that it's giving you shortcuts to webapps like GMail and web-based IM. There are web-based tax programs and budgeting sites, Google docs, and Flash games. YouTube, MySpace and Facebook are the latest killer apps for PCs these days. A lot of people aren't buying PCs for the software you can run off the store shelf, they're buying them more and more for the online apps. Why buy a box at the store when you get things done just by visiting a web site?

    I'm not saying there isn't value in local applications, or in keeping your data stored locally. But for people who are really concerned about that, a good distro (gOS is based on Ubuntu) will provide repos where you can find good software to run locally. There are still shortcomings, like tax software. But as more and more people embrace a low-cost linux PC for the reasons specified by the GPP, software companies will see more value in producing apps for linux.

  195. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    Did you read your own comment, you elitist prick? Mods, I am offended by this asshole's flamebait comment.

    You say you don't shop at WalMart then trash the people you see in there. If you don't shop at walmart then why do you go in? To see us white trash rednecks and revel in your superiority? I guess you don't go to Osco's or Cub Foods or Mier's either, because they have even fewer cashiers and slower lines.

    I don't like their business practices either, but those business practices come from being rich corporate whores with no consience just like every other evil damned corporation this century. Today's corporations are all headed by sociopaths. All of them. Where is your money invested, you yuppie scum?

    You have an alternative to WalMart?

    -normal non-rich, non-yuppie, non-elitist

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  196. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    No, I'd say you were the ethnocentric prick who doesn't want anybody to even mention a store you don't have in your country. The fucking story is about WalMart you dumbass!

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  197. Stabbeth with Steely Knives by fast+turtle · · Score: 1
    and the first thing that's going to happen when Joe Sixpack can't run that shiny new copy of the Sims bought at the same time is a demanded refund for the computer and the software and some damn lawyer gets the bright idea to file a class action lawsuit against Walmart for false advertising because any reasonable joe sixpack knows that a PC runs windows.


    That's right, it's not a PC according to joe sixpack because it's not running windows and I'm really sorry to say that it's the lowest common denominator of Joe Sixpack that's going to decide this case in favor of Windows.


    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  198. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

    Racist? Elitist, sure. But not racist.

    Shopping at Wal-Mart - yep, you sure can save money. So what's your stance on outsourcing? That's why I don't shop there. I don't want my job outsourced, and I don't shop at Wal-Mart.

  199. Rosy story, but I doubt it will play that way... by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    Who do you think just went out and bought up all those $200 Linux PCs? Do you think it was "joe-sixpack"? I doubt it. They were probably all bought out by people who are already pro-Linux.

    Do you know what is going to happen to Joe Sixpack who doesn't know Linux from Vista? He's going to go buy one of these $200 "PCs" for his kid for Christmas because it's cheap. He's going to then buy a few software titles off the shelf while he's at it, so the kid has something to play with on Christmas morning. But the applications he buys will probably be for Vista, because he doesn't know the difference. Come Christmas morning he's going to have a rude awakening that the software he bought won't work with his Linux PC. He's going to go back to Walmart and discover, rather rudely, what "Vista" and "Linux" is, and then he's going to find out that 99% of the software on Walmart's shelf is for Windows and won't work on the computer he bought.

    And then the computer is going to find itself sitting on the shelf at the returns counter.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  200. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I'd rather spend ten bucks on a pair of sneakers made by child labor at WalMart than a pair of Nikes made by child labor at some high priced mall store.

    Now that's what I call a false dichotomy!

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  201. Eh, what? by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 0

    This is the regular, ordinary, joe-sixpack, "what's a right-click?" kind of person. The kind of people scorned by many of the elitists in the OS and PC fields. The kind of people that voted for GW Bush, that fly American flags from their porches, that have communities with 4th of July parties that everyone in town attends.

    Hmmmm... I make a six-digit salary per year managing a number of Sun servers, including several 15Ks and 25K; I have at least six PCs not including my two Sun workstations at home, and recently finished building my newest gaming PC that would make most "gaming" PCs blush. I still would have purchased one of these Wal-Mart PCs in a heartbeat if they didn't fly off the shelves in the way they did because they are great values and are completely capable of doing "the basics". Oh, I also know what "right-click" means.

    But because I voted for Bush, fly the U.S. flag, and believe that July 4th is more than just a day off I no longer qualify for Slashdot elitist crowd? Damn, I live in the mid-Atlantic area, too, so I guess I'd better get mahself packin' and move my arse over to them thar plain states an' watch them fancy thing-a-ma-jig flyin' thangs fly over mah head. Dang, ah'm gonna have a big problem gittin' used to calling that fizzy stuff "pop", too. But those community get-togethers shore do have lots o' apple pies! Ah, the life of simpletons in that thar midwest area! But at least ah git to use that newfangled Looniux .. er .. Leenuck .. uh .. oh, hell, that PC thang is cheap so I'm-uh gonna buy it! Does it come with that thar Internet thingy installed?{/SARCASM}

    :P

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    1. Re:Eh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voted for bush? Pretty much marks you out as a retard, doesn't it?

    2. Re:Eh, what? by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 0

      Ooh. Ooh. Some childish, moronic post from an AC troll who doesn't have the balls to post under a real account and clearly can't stand the fact that not everyone has the same opinions. Uh huh. Yeah, like I'm really going to take you seriously. Go back to Digg where you belong.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    3. Re:Eh, what? by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

      Awww... I got an "Overrated". Did I offend a moderation troll who enjoys abusing his mod point privileges and is too afraid in his convictions that his mod might have been metamoderated as "Unfair" if he used something other than "Overrated"? Oh, you poor little baby. Go back to mommy now.

      --
      The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
    4. Re:Eh, what? by IllForgetMyNickSoonA · · Score: 1

      Well, judging on your two posts above, the AC wasn't that wrong...

  202. Does in come in Mexican? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Hand to God when I go to Wal*Mart I am the only Anglo in the store.

    1. Re:Does in come in Mexican? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, kind of like visiting Mexico without leaving the US borders.

    2. Re:Does in come in Mexican? by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      You know, that bothered me at first, but now I've started to soak up the diversity. Plus, the blatantly un-PC "Hispanic Foods" isle at Wal-Mart usually has the neatest imported foods from south of the border, like whole boxes of Poncillo and Pepsi's made with real cane sugar.

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  203. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. I dislike you and consider you a troll, but you have regained some measure of respect today.

  204. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    Yesterday was a holiday and I don't do Monday's very well. An I went out drinking with a couple of professional drinkers over the weekend, BIG MISTAKE!

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  205. Wal-Mart vs. Linux by Pictish+Prince · · Score: 1

    Observing that Wal-Marts is largely controlled by the CCP, I still applaud the release of a truly affordable PC with Linux pre-installed, no matter what you think of Enlightenment (I personally think it sux).

    --
    Only his tendency toward a dazed stupor prevented him from screaming aloud.
  206. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

    I'm lucky enough to have some competition in my area - there's still a K-Mart not too far from where I live, although Wal-mart is much closer (15min drive vs. 3min drive).

    I'm also lucky enough to have a choice of grocery stores, so I go to the 'underdog' one, because competition is better for everyone (everyone who matters, anyway).

  207. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's the thing, seee, if Walmart was the only one then I probably wouldn't shop there. But the stuff I see in WalMart is the same stuff I see everywhere else; same brands, etc. When I call my mortgage company I talk to someone with an accent so think I can't even understand him.

    I do refuse to use the self-checkout in th egrocery store. Not like it's going to do any good, I used to refuse to use self-service at the gas station untill there was no such thing as full service.

    If there was an alternative I'd use it. But it's buy a Matushushi at WalMart or buy the same brand somewhere else. Maytag is no longer made in the US; Zenith sold out to France years ago and no longer is made in the US. Fords are made in Canada. Everything is outsourced; I don't understand why the US hasn't gone broke already, as we don't make anything any more!

    I'm not going to knock the wall down by butting my head against it.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  208. Keyboards? We don' need no stinkin' keyboards... by crovira · · Score: 1

    My first box was hooked up to a KSR-33 teletype machine and has a front panel with toggle switches and LEDs.

    (Actually, I lie. My first box I got to screw with was a Wang 2200, but that was the school's where I was going. But the Altair "Switch Bitch" was mine.)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  209. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by quangdog · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, I wonder how many of them may like the interface and openness of the platform more? How many will discover just how much easier/cheaper/better using linux really can be? I'm willing to bet we'll have a fair number of folks return it because it does not have a start menu, but I'd like to think that we'll also see a lot of people actually dump windows all together in favor of their new OS of choice. -- Kimball Larsen http://www.kimballlarsen.com/

  210. C7?! Mmmm... Padlock crypto goodness. by danFL-NERaves · · Score: 1

    I'm going to have to temporarily suspend my moral embargo against buying from Wal-Mart if they have a $200 PC with a C7 chip. The C7 is a beautiful little chip with all sorts of hardware cryptography begging to be taken advantage of. Via's Padlock engine is an amazing and underappreciated tool that security geeks would do well to take note of. And if this Linux is using the 2.6.22 kernel it'll have all the tools baked right in to take advantage of that raw cryptographic power. I use an MSI Axis 700 system running Gentoo Hardened for my firewall/VPN package and love the performance.

  211. Get them free... by jar240 · · Score: 1
    Watch curbsides for these, as once people run into a little difficulty with them, they'll be thrown in the trash. That's a win for us garbage-pickers!

    --
    "You can drive out Nature with a pitchfork, but It always comes roaring back again." - Tom Waits
  212. Maybe the Linux revolution started 15 years ago by Coop · · Score: 1

    and you're just now noticing.

    And I gotta laugh at the one-bit minds here, on or off, not sure if they like Wal-Mart or not. Maybe with another decade of maturity they'll have, say, 2 bits, so they can rate Wal-Mart on a ReallyLike/KindaLike/KindaDislike/ReallyDislike scale. Oh the nuance! "Life is too complicated, I'm gonna go play WoW."

    --
    "If you're not passionate about your operating system, you're married to the wrong one."
  213. Selection effect by drix · · Score: 1

    Yes, that is a lot of glowing reviews from males in the 25-34 age bracket. I can't help but wonder how many non-geeks would sign on to post a negative experience, if only they could figure out how to work this god-damned, dysfunctional non-Windows POS they bought for $200 from Wal-Mart :-)

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  214. Now I'm confused by MrEkted · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who jumped on this bandwagon 5 years ago? http://www.linux.com/articles/23807
    Back then $200 would get you an "AMD Duron 850 MHz system, with 10 GB Maxtor hard drive, 128 MB of memory, and 52x Samsung CDROM drive."
    With "LindowsOS" (pre-lawsuit).
    It doesn't seem like this new machine is that much more advanced.

    --
    Tell the moon dogs, tell the March hare
  215. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by plague3106 · · Score: 1

    Huh? I've never heard anyone say Walmart that didn't mean exactly Walmart.

    Also, its a regional thing that people call cola sodas "Coke." Again, almost everywhere I've heard Coke to mean coke and pepsi to mean pepsi. Just that coke is sold at more places than pepsi.

  216. Re:How many will be returned? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    Why would software not run from add/remove or synaptic?

  217. Aw I went and ordered one from ZaReason by crovira · · Score: 1

    I'll find out what all the fuss is about, exactly how many Bogomips is does, and get a new Linux box, (for $200 [but plus shipping from Berkeley CA. {which is just up the road from the company that makes the boxes.}])

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Aw I went and ordered one from ZaReason by SykeZareason · · Score: 1

      3000 bogomips

  218. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow are you ever a chemical-centric jerk. I guarantee you there are hordes of pure energy lifeforms shopping at wal-mart , even though we are entirely invisible.

  219. offtopic by hitchhacker · · Score: 1

    Sorry to hear about your car/insurance crap. That totally sucks. My window ended up costing around $300.

    -metric

    1. Re:offtopic by drachenstern · · Score: 1

      Yeah, still haven't got a tint on the window either, that's a whole nother story unto itself

      --
      2^3 * 31 * 647
  220. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by Coolhand2120 · · Score: 1

    You need to do a little homework. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariff A communist government OWNS all the companies that originated in that country. A "traditional" communist government will simply not allow retail stores to sell items they don't want sold to their people. Simple. No 'shoring up' the foreign item just doesn't exist.

    Oh did you think that in a communist government you can pick and choose what and who you buy from and where your money goes? Nope! If you're not a card carrying party member you can stand in line and get whatever your GOVERMENT offers. There are no private party resellers, every company is beholden to any whim of the government. There is nothing stopping them from saying "You know what? NO INTEL!, and now THIS guy owns your company, and we think you should GO TO A WORK CAMP." That's what WE (the U.S.) are competing against!

    The whole reason VIA competing with Intel is unfair is because Intel is bound by the laws and regulations of the U.S., VIA can have sweatshops and dormitories full of farmers daughters manning their plants, Intel is beholden to the EPA, labour unions, and the radical environmentalist movement in the U.S.. VIA is held to no standard, if they were to pay their workers $.05 an hour, nobody would say a damn thing about it. If Intel did the same thing they would be run out of town by the same people that are cheering on VIA. VIA can dump waste into the local waterways or bury hazardous waste anywhere, nobody in China cares, and yes, sorry, even the U.S. recognizes Taiwan as a Chinese colony, and I'm pretty sure everyone in Taiwan is Chinese and at least half of the 'Democratic' Chinese are... communist!

    I don't even know why I'm arguing, any computer tech. worth his weight in salt knows that VIA chips are horrible and will crash unexpectedly, not work when you need them, cause random hangups and just plain suck. If you haven't had that experience with them then you haven't really used them. Say nothing about supporting a communist government that is very hostile http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/14/world/main2179694.shtml towards our country.

  221. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    How small does this small town have to be? I grew up in a small town, and I don't personally know anyone from there who shops at one. How does 6000-ish sound http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houlton,_Maine, Houlton, Maine. Population around 6000+ practically everybody shops at walmart, because there's nothing else. (For about 40 miles, and that's across the Canadian Border)

    As for high Speed Internet... yes, there is DSL, and Wireless, but it's very limited, and there has been almost no development on either front in the last 3 years.

    Dial-Up is still the norm here, if anything. There are still people in the area without electricity (and not just the Amish)
    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  222. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from the fact that the average Wal-Mart shopper is on the whole from a different socio-economic group than I, I tend to find it ridiculous that every time I go into a Wal-Mart, I have to spend 10 mintues waiting in a damn check out line.

    Confirmed elitist - check. Confirmed as wannabe pseudo-intellectual due to extremely poor grammar and sentence structure - check. To put even more elitist classism and stereotyping in this thread - you sound exactly like what you are deriding. The typical Wal-Mart shopper.

  223. Re:Rosy story, but I doubt it will play that way.. by raw-sewage · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, your scenario probably isn't too far off.

    I built my fiancee a computer a few weeks ago and installed Ubuntu on it. Works fine for her most of the time, as she only does "the basics" (web, email, photos, etc).

    But Linux still struggles a bit with the basics. She went to pay her credit card bill online, at CitiCards.com. The site doesn't work with Firefox. Google "firefox citicards" or see this link.

    Now, in this case, you could argue that it's Citi's fault. But the point is, to someone like my fiancee, who's not a slack-jawed yokel by any means, who just wants a computer that works without tweaking or troubleshooting, it's broke. She has no interest in googling "firefox citicards" and figuring out how to work around the problem. She can just use her Windows PC at work and visit the site with IE and be done with it.

    I suppose the ideal outcome would be that if enough Citi Card-holding "Joe Sixpacks" bought the $200 Wal-Mart Linux PC and wanted to pay their bills online, maybe Citi would actually correct their website. But as you can see from the thread I linked, Citi has already said, "sorry, we don't support Linux or Firefox."

  224. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    IINM the same corporation that owns WalMart bought out Kmart a few years ago. I have a choice of grocery stores (although there's only one close enough to be handy) but oddly, they're all about the same, except the Miejer store, which is a gigantic store that advertises its low prices despite the fact that it's the most expensive store in town.

    It was the first with self-serve checkout. I wouldn't shop there even if it were close and cheap.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  225. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow twitter, now you are calling those who use AOL stupid and they need to be removed from the gene pool? I didn't know you could go any lower, now you show me that you can go lower. How much lower can you go twitter?

  226. found that 100$ unit for my living room by IPAQ2000 · · Score: 1

    I wanted to buy one of those machines for watching video in my living room , but then I found that 100$ flash player , no fan , no noise ,no OS, tiny and sexy and I bought it. It's amazing and I can play all my axxo Bitorent downloads on it, I even take it to the car with my kid's movies. I think I need one with 16 GB for my bedroom. Oh yes , no boot time its always up... http://www.amazon.com/Sansa-TakeTV-GB-Video-Player/dp/B000XB4P8Y/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1194984371&sr=8-1

  227. Funny, Citibank is pretty good about Firefox by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

    I use Firefox on my PCLOS box to access Citibank online all the time. For some reason they don't like however my Firefox is identifying itself (pretty dumb, since they accept Firefox on Windows without a glitch). But at least, Citibank provides a 'proceed anyway' link that lets you in and everything works perfectly.

    So, it's odd that this CitiCards site wouldn't work - unless they're blocking you at the doorway. It work with Firefox/Windows.

    --
    Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
  228. 10,000 units out.... by VMaN · · Score: 1

    .....and I still can't find anything resembling performance benchmarks? :(

    I really want this thing, anyone know if it can run 720p h264 video?

  229. Re:Rosy story, but I doubt it will play that way.. by Intron · · Score: 1
    Here's what the validator says:

    This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict!
    Result: Failed validation, 131 Errors
    Address: https://www.citicards.com/cards/wv/home.do
    Encoding: iso-8859-1
    Doctype: XHTML 1.0 Strict
    Root Element: html
    Their poor online support is one reason I stopped using Citi. Here's the direct link to their help page to complain about their website: https://www.citicards.com/cards/wv/topLevel.do?screenID=502
    --
    Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  230. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by snoogans126 · · Score: 1

    Walmart is most certainly not a generic term, it is Walmart, Target is Target, and KMart is KMart (although they like to call themselves Big KMart these days, you could even make an argument for Sears jr.).
    And "Cola" most certainly not the same as "Coke". I won't say that you can't call a Pepsi a Coke, but that you sound stupid when you do.

  231. Running in circles by westlake · · Score: 1
    One thing I've suspected for awhile, is that the "Linux Revolution" (Linux taking off as a desktop alternative) would NOT happen at businesses or with high-end users. It will happen much like the "Windows Revolution" happened back in the 90's. It will start with the "Walmart buyer". Ordinary people making ordinary FINANCIAL decisions to buy a cheap PC. This is the regular, ordinary, joe-sixpack, "what's a right-click?" kind of person.

    I think not.

    Walmart is a deep discount retailer with a split personality: a chain that is trying to move up-market.

    It is perfectly willing to unload a carload of otherwise unsaleable low-end PCs on to the Geek - who will, quite predictably, post rave reviews on their website. That there is no matching printer kinda gets lost in the shuffle.

    The HP All-In-One Printer for XP, Vista and OSX is $50.

    The fundamental problem with the $200 net appliance is that Internet service costs at least $20 a month. If you can afford the Internet, you can afford a "real" PC.

    The Vista Premium desktop at Walmart.com starts at $500. Dual core Athlon CPU. 1 or 2 GB of RAM, 320 GB HDD, DVD burner and so on. The next step up is integrated WiFi and you won't get lost hunting for a driver.

    1. Re:Running in circles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support for HP printers on Linux is generally pretty good and that printer you linked also works with Linux, it just isn't mentioned there. In fact I would expect that since gOS is based on Ubuntu it'll just work when the user plugs it in, whereas with Windows and OS X, you'd have to install extra software for it.

  232. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    BTW, your ignorance is showing. They're not going to need that AOL CD; the internet works out of the box on a Linux computer, unlike Windows.

    BTW, your ignorance is showing. Four [Windows] computers in this room... Four [Windows] computers which connected to the internet by simply plugging in a cable from my router and following a simple wizard.
     
     

    I resent that incredibly racist and elitist statement. I may not be the "typical" WalMart customer, but I do shop there. I would be a fool to spend fifty dollars for a pair of jeans elsewhere when I can get a pair of Wranglers at Wal Mart for $12.

    If you are spending $50 on jeans - you are a fool. Mine cost me $25, and they are real jeans - not the low quality knockoffs sold at Wal-Mart. (You have to be really, really, careful shopping at Wal-mart. Many of their 'brand name' items are low quality 'self knockoffs' manufactured specifically for sale at Wal-Mart.)
  233. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by snoogans126 · · Score: 1

    Maybe you could try giving your plants some water?

  234. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by genner · · Score: 1

    Where is this wonderul country?
    I tyhought Walmart had conquered the world already.

  235. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure your pimply face and fat ass add so much to the ambiance.

  236. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    I find the idea of a "typical" Walmart shopper to be really dumb.
    A lot of people shop at Walmart. I go to Walmart to buy mulch and compost for my garden at Walmart. My local WalMart sells "Earthwise" mulch and compost that is made by a local company. They are in fact a very echo friendly company and locally owned. So why shouldn't I buy a green local product from Walmart?
    These boxes are a great example. I think it would make a good NAS for your home. Just load in FreeNAS or Openfiler.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  237. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I resent that incredibly racist and elitist statement.

    Racist? I didn't realize there was a certain race that shopped at Wal-mart more than others.

    I would be a fool to spend fifty dollars for a pair of jeans elsewhere when I can get a pair of Wranglers at Wal Mart for $12.

    No, you would be a fool to buy a $12 pair of jeans anywhere. You can get some good deals at Wal-mart, but you're far more likely to be ripped-off, fooled by low prices, not realizing, until too late, that the quality is 10X worse than the product you didn't want to pay 2X as much for...

    Really now, it's not as if Walmart has some magic wand, that allows them to sell the same products for a lower price than every other retailer. What you're giving up, for the insignificantly lower price, is significant. There are some cases where they'll have the same items as other stores, at loss-leader pricing, but that is a rare exception.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  238. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I guarantee you almost everyone on Slashdot shops at Wal-Mart,

    I guarantee you a majority of the people on Slashdot do not.

    There have been plenty of studies on the typical Wal-Mart shoppers. It's well-known what the average political views and socio-economic status of the large majority of Wal-mart customers are, and /.ers do not qualify.

    It's not elitism at all, it's just the facts. Even politicians are using those simple facts to target specific voter demographics.

    If the PC is sold out, 85% of it is because of dorks like you and me. The other 15% is people that didn't know what they were buying.

    Now there's some pro-Microsoft elitism if I've ever heard-it.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  239. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Tikkun · · Score: 1

    Water? Like, outta the toilet?

  240. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by snoogans126 · · Score: 1
    You've made my day.


    Comin' up next on The Violence Channel: An all-new "Ow, My Balls!"

  241. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That and a buck fifty will get me the Post this Sunday.

  242. Extensibility? by My+name+is+Bucket · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have specs on the hardware? Can someone who owns the box take a look inside?

    I want to know if there's a PCI-E or AGP slot for a video card. Also, is there a free power connector for the video card/extra HDD? Does it have SATA? What's the max bus speed supported for RAM?

    1. Re:Extensibility? by HardcorePooka · · Score: 1

      No PCI-E as the board doesn't support it. Two PCI slots. No SATA.

      Also... the computers are in stock at zareason.com

      You can also buy just the board for $60 if you have a bunch of spare parts laying around. board available here

  243. Attention Walmart Shoppers... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    I didn't realize Walmart shoppers were smart enough to use Linux. One thing I do know is that they'll be the cheapest thing possible, so a $200 computer was a pretty smart move, even if your average Walmart customer has about three brain cells and is married to his cousin.

  244. Well just see the exact metrics, shall we. :-) by crovira · · Score: 1

    I needed a new box anyway.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  245. But what about Austin, TX? by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1


    From what I can tell, Centaur was originally an Austin, TX, company, and was sold to VIA in 1999.

    Did they have their original fabs in Austin?

    If so, do any of their fabs remain in Austin?

    1. Re:But what about Austin, TX? by hitchhacker · · Score: 1

      I don't see any of the top 10 Pure-play semiconductor foundries in Austin. Note that the top 4 of those foundries hold about 84% of the market. If VIA does happen to use any fabs based in Austin, then it isn't much of their production.

      -metric

  246. Re:Chinese computers for sale. by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1
    Here I was thinking Americans were all for the free market and capitalism, where competition like that of linux and VIA is encouraged and free trade agreements that abolish protectionist tariffs are signed to benefit both parties economies. You want to impose a tax on China - who do you think you are, the King of England? No taxation without representation!

    If this threatens the market share of either MS or Intel that is a good thing for every American, and a cornerstone of our affluent western capitalist society. AMD has kept Intel lean, mean and efficient while inadequate competition has made Microsoft lethargic and bloated. MS needs to shape up, and there's no better way than some healthy competition. Monopolies are no good for our free markets, capitalism requires decent competition.

  247. Re:How many will be returned? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    not as many as brag to their friends about how easy it is to find software and how their computer has been set up and in use for months with no viruses

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  248. Via and video by symbolset · · Score: 1

    These Via machines are strictly business -- not for gaming. While the processor might keep up with the demands of the game, there just isn't an AGP or PCIe slot to hang a modern graphics card on - just one PCI slot.

    I don't have the box in TFA yet, my experience is just with the 1.3 GHz via mini-itx board. It only supports 1GB of DDR-400, but will drive four IDE and two SATA drives for a total max of (I think) 6TB of direct attached storage. It has svideo out.

    I got decent fullscreen video (standard def) from a ripped DVD. JibJab, Homestarrunner and so on are still fun to watch. I can't remember if I ever looked at Youtube on it. They're nice for mythbox type stuff. You can get a 98% efficient power supply for it from mini-box.com that takes 10v - 19.2v DC and drives the whole system off of that. With the notebook style power brick that means no PSU fan -- just one tiny 40mm fan on the CPU.

    These boards are popular for thin clients as well.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  249. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    Apologies.
    I sit corrected.

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  250. so can i be a geezer too ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i had an xt it was more like 4mhz, less than 5 anyway, i could look it up but hey i bet you the 'turbo switch' on your current machine :P, 40meg mfm hdd, my friend only had a 10meg mfm.
    there was this great multiplayer tank game that ran on the cga, where two people could control two tanks onscreen simultaneously, together with a whole screen painted with scenery and some adverseries.

    of course this was no problem when the keyboard handler was a hook directly into the hardware driven int

    another friend later got a 286 a couple of years later when they came out, he also had an ega, which could run commander keen. yay

    so can i be a geezer too ?

    1. Re:so can i be a geezer too ? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      so can i be a geezer too ?

      Sure, all you have to do is not die.

      I wrote a two player tanks game for the Sinclair 1000. We wore out the keypad playing it!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  251. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by tkiesel · · Score: 1

    Really now, it's not as if Walmart has some magic wand, that allows them to sell the same products for a lower price than every other retailer.
    True. What they have is economies of scale. Not magic. Mathematics! Which is far more effective. I agree with most of your comment otherwise.
  252. In stock at NewEgg? by AngusSF · · Score: 1
    As of this typing, it's in stock at NewEgg:

    Newegg.com - EVEREX gPC TC2502 VIA C7-D 1.5GHz 512MB DDR2 80GB VIA UniChrome Pro Linux gOS - Retail http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16883118003
    --
    "A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything." Shane (1953)
  253. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Economies of scale have diminishing returns, and Walmart has practically no advantage over other major big box retailers. eg. Target. What makes Wal-mart able to sustain nominally cheaper prices is the significantly lower wages they pay their employees.

    Also, economies of scale is balanced by diseconomies of scale.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  254. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    BTW, your ignorance is showing. Four [Windows] computers in this room... Four [Windows] computers which connected to the internet by simply plugging in a cable from my router and following a simple wizard.

    I've never found any of Microsoft's "wizards" to be simple. And there is no wizard needed in Linux.

    If you are spending $50 on jeans - you are a fool.

    Agreed.

    Mine cost me $25, and they are real jeans - not the low quality knockoffs sold at Wal-Mart. (You have to be really, really, careful shopping at Wal-mart. Many of their 'brand name' items are low quality 'self knockoffs' manufactured specifically for sale at Wal-Mart.)

    I'm wearing the same pair of Wranglers I paid $12 at WalMart for three years ago. I'm not into "brand names" or fashion. Maybe I should be, I might get laid once in a while...

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  255. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    Racist? I didn't realize there was a certain race that shopped at Wal-mart more than others.

    You see few people there who aren't white. If you make disparaging remarks about custoimers of a business whose customers are mostly black, that's racist, even if you're black yourself. So is making disparaging statements about a business whose main clientelle are white.

    No, you would be a fool to buy a $12 pair of jeans anywhere

    I paid $12 for the jeans I'm wearing tight now. I've had them for three years. They're comfortable. What's foolish about that? WalMart usually gets their prices from economy of scale; they're huge and have an efficient distribution system. Sure, they rip off their employees, but so do all their competitors. Ten years ago when their competetion was all union I refused to shop there, but there's little choice now. They're all nonunion.

    If they had a competetitor who used union labor, I'd shop at the competetior even if prices were higher.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  256. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by ryanov · · Score: 1

    Supermarkets? Even K-Mart? Thanks for the example, since this is totally out of my area.

    Where HAD people shopped, since Wal*Mart is relatively new.

  257. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by ryanov · · Score: 1

    What about Sears? How about Andy's IGA Foodliner, Shop 'n Save, etc.? There's also a True Value hardware.

    I mean, yeah, there's probably noplace else where you can buy all that in one store, but that hardly counts.

    As for clothing, I'm not sure... does Sears sell clothing?

  258. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    I see another fellow shire-towner :-)

    No, the sears here doesn't sell clothes, it's just a sears catalog store

    yes there's Marden's, where you can sometimes buy clothing. If you're a twig.

    and there's not a True Value any more (Being pedantic, but it just got bought out by SW Collins)

    Sad but true, Walmart here has the best selection of infant Products (And Having a 2-year old, I've looked) From toddler silverware, to sippy cups, to bottles. The Shop & Save and IGA have a very limited selection, typically only 2 or 3 choices as opposed to the 15 or 16 that the walmart has.
    Electronics, There is nothing in the area, the closest is Presque Isle, about 45 miles north.

    I'm not supporting WalMart, Hell, I'd love to be able to get things locally, but there's also the problem that most of the local stores close at 5. makes it difficult to get there.

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  259. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by ryanov · · Score: 1

    I come from here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutherford,_New_Jersey -- it's not really the same situation though. It IS bigger, and it's 20 mins outside of NYC.

    I don't live there now though. In that area, however, it wasn't Wal*Mart, it was malls with other stores (JC Penney, etc.)

    Some of it is about choice though. Does one really NEED 15-16 choices? In a smaller store, too, sometimes it doesn't take much to get them to buy something you need that they don't sell.

    The hours are a real problem though. I now live in Newark, NJ and most things close at 6. It makes it HARD to get there, but not impossible. On a lot of days, though, it doesn't happen. There really should be some sort of subsidy for staying open late as a small business in a slow area or something... I dunno what the solution is.

  260. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or perhaps some of us work 16 hour days and Walmart is the only thing open when we're not on-duty. I'm sure everyone in existence would love to be as elitist as you and be able to shop at Tiffany's for the diamond-studded stick we have shoved up our ass, but some of us but somehow we're just not so lucky.

  261. Re:Not to troll, but what do they expect for retur by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    Some of it is about choice though. Does one really NEED 15-16 choices? Yes... When my son is alergic to (among other things) egg, and milk... YES!
    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  262. Re:Walmart Lesson:Linux is Popular in Middle Ameri by xebra · · Score: 1

    Lol, fair enough, though most everyone that doesn't live in the US, Canada, Mexico, the UK, Japan, Puerto Rico, Argentina, or Brazil (and until 2006, South Korea and Germany) probably has other superstores to shop at. The meat of my complaint didn't depend on the specific identity of the store.

  263. screw you, coastline bigots by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    Guess what Texas, Illinois, Ohio and Michigan have in common besides being "fly-over" states? They're all in the top ten states as ranked by population.

    Illinois (12,831,970) alone has the population of Maryland (5,600,388) and Virginia (7,078,515) combined. Ohio (11,478,006) has more people than Washington (6,395,798) and Oregon (3,700,758) combined.

    Sam Walton was much richer than Bill Gates, and he started Wal-Mart in Arkansas. There are 56 of the Fortune 500 companies headquartered in Texas, 33 in Illinois, 28 in Ohio, 22 in Michigan, and 20 in Minnesota. That's 159 of the biggest 500 companies, or over 30%.

    We're not just talking about some nameless holding companies, either. That McDonald's burger you had for lunch? Illinois company. The Motorola phone in your buddy's pocket? Illinois company. Boeing, State Farm, Walgreen, Caterpillar, ADM, Sears, Allstate, CDW, OfficeMax? Illinois. ExxonMobil, Chevron, Halliburton? Texas. Dell? Texas. J.C. Penney? Texas. Blockbuster? Texas. Target? Minnesota. Best Buy? Minnesota. General Mills? Minnesota. 3M? Minnesota. GM, Ford, Delphi? All Michigan. So are Dow Chemical, Lear, and Kellogg. How every different your economy, landscape, and grocery stores would look without the "fly-over" states. You'd probably have to fly over them in a French plane, eating imported beef and bread from Brazil and typing your attacks on the Midwest and South on a Chinese PC, if you could find anyone to fuel the damn thing.

  264. Re:Rosy story, but I doubt it will play that way.. by cecil_turtle · · Score: 1

    Browser compatibility issues go both ways, I don't think it's a valid argument for people not adopting linux.

    As an example, I've recently run into a number of IE7 compatibility issues. Granted they're not "public" websites, but a number of my customers at work need to use certain types of systems (CRM, whatever) that are only IE6 compatible (still). Also I've run into problems on management interfaces of network devices that aren't IE7 compatible - (a few Dell switches, SonicWall Firewalls, etc.). We keep our stuff pretty up to date and it's getting difficult to find an IE6 browser anymore to manage some of these devices. It's almost to the point where it'd be easier to run IEs4Linux than to actually find an IE6 box.

  265. Penguins on Lexmarks by Keith+McClary · · Score: 1

    The Penguins on Lexmarks guarantee they won't work. The more expensive Lexmarks work fine with Linux.

    Of course the cheap Lexmarks are boat anchors when attached to any operating system.

  266. I hate MS office, but by midgley · · Score: 1

    you have indeed not met me.

  267. Re:Follow up by symbolset · · Score: 1

    I wound up getting this box from another vendor. Plays DVDs great. Does 1680x1050 resolution on my widescreen just fine. No SVGA out - 2 pci slots, no others. 2 unused SATA ports, 8 open bays. Five minutes to install flash and citrix client. Other than that no mods and it's a good work box, with the stock gOS system. I wonder if gOS is a reference to Google OS, or if it's just for the Gutsy Gibbon flavor of Ubuntu it's derived from. Whatever. It comes with loads of Google brand widgets that do all the right stuff and aren't annoying or scary enough to make it worth installing over. Does all the videos from CNN, youtube, etc. I'll use it for work if I can get it away from my 4yo, that is. He likes to play the learning games that come in the package installer. The keyboard and mouse are junk, but I expected that. The USB powered mini speakers are fine. It's quiet, which I expected since it's a low wattage system.

    In short, very happy with the purchase, would buy again, +++++

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  268. Oh dear god.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Which other way is there to look at a person that voted for Bush and perpetrates mindless nationalism/patriotism in the rese of us?

    Look down on them as you say, is the only rational answer, in the context of your post that is.

    You may be correct that they will make the Linux revolution go mainstream, but that does not make them heroic figures.

    I would be glad if Linux remained a minority OS if these people have not voted for Bush, thus saving hundreds of thousands of innocent lives.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  269. Please complain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay my Citi card bills using firefox in Ubuntu (I live in the UK).

    Now the kicker (and the reason I post as an AC): I work for Citi and know that there is a push to use Web standards where they are not already in use. Any new web application that does not support all the mainstream browsers would not make it into the wild I believe.

    If you complain about this the push to fix Citi sites that are IE only will be stronger.

  270. Racist? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Er, uhm, whatever....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  271. Great idea dumbo by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Lets save "US jobs" by screwing US costumers.

    Great logic that of yours pal.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.