Slashdot Mirror


Anyone Besides Zune Owners With New Year's Crashes?

aputerguy writes "My Fedora 8 Linux server crashed sometime between 18:59:40 EST (GMT -5:00) and 19:00:00 EST (GMT -5:00) on Dec 31, 2008 which remarkably corresponds to within at most 20 seconds of the New Year in GMT. I have been running this same hardware non-stop for more than six years and other than the occasional reboot for kernel (or distro) upgrades, it has not crashed more than 1 or 2 times in 2237 days of cumulative uptime. Nothing other than background processes were running at the time of the crash. Could this be a coincidence or was there some 2008/2009 rollover issue going on here? Has anyone (other than Zune 30GB owners) noticed similar year-end issues with their computers or electronic devices?"

339 of 480 comments (clear)

  1. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, you know what they say, this wouldn't have happened with Red Hat.

    1. Re:Well by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nobody got fired for going with Redhat?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Well by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Shazbot!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  2. SKY TV set top box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here in the UK, our skytv settop box crashed (lost all tv channels but not the menus precisley at 00:00 1/1/2009 needed a cold boot to get the channels back.

    1. Re:SKY TV set top box by Thanster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Replying to myself, as I forgot my login details briefly. Sky tv set top box crashed precisely at midnight (was sadly watching the newyears TV stuff. Had to switch over to the old fashioned arial to watch the london fireworks. Did this happen to anyone else (thinking unlikely to find many people willing to admit watching the newyear on tv!) (personal excuse is having a young child!)

    2. Re:SKY TV set top box by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Funny

      A similar thing, though probably unrelated to the leap second - my parents VHS clock has been flashing 12:00 since 1986.
      It would probably bring bad luck for the new year to set it correctly for 2009, so I think ill leave it.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    3. Re:SKY TV set top box by inKubus · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's because typically Cable (or Sat) channels are contracted to carriers over a calendar year. So, at midnight on Jan 1st, some channels are added and some dropped. You probably will notice new channels and a few missing ones if you look close.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    4. Re:SKY TV set top box by MentalMooMan · · Score: 5, Informative

      My mythtv box (running mythbuntu) crashed within about a second of midnight as I was trying to watch the fireworks, and stopped responding to ping, ssh, everything.
      My excuse for staying in and watching the celebrations on TV is that... my dog ate... my shoes.

      Yes, that'll do...

      --
      43rd Law of Computing:
      Anything that can go wr
      fortune: Segmentation violation -- Core Dumped
    5. Re:SKY TV set top box by jonfr · · Score: 1

      My sky tv box did work as normal over to the new year. No problems. My other (non-sky) sat box did not crash either.

      So did all of my other hardware, gsm phones and stuff.

    6. Re:SKY TV set top box by Cowmonaut · · Score: 1

      Probably just a coincidence for me. My Nokia phone had an OS lockup when I was leaving me mate's house this morning. Had to take out the battery and reboot it. But that was like, 8:36 AM or some shit.

    7. Re:SKY TV set top box by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      A similar thing, though probably unrelated to the leap second - my parents VHS clock has been flashing 12:00 since 1986.

      To be fair, this could be due to a combination of a few conditions:

      (1) frugal parents
      (2) cheap VCR that loses the time when it loses power, even momentarily
      (3) a sufficient number of instances of (2) to smother the desire for correct time on the VCR

    8. Re:SKY TV set top box by baegucb_18706 · · Score: 1

      meh. Back in the 80s when I had a VCR, unless there was a timed program I wanted to watch, I didn't consider the time worth my while. To dig out the manual, or to try and figure out the programming of the device. Total waste of time when I was learning a new assembler language, as opposed to IBM's assembler. Obligatory: Get off my lawn!

    9. Re:SKY TV set top box by schwinn8 · · Score: 1

      Interesting... my Mythbuntu box (8.04) has had no issues, and has continued to record programs all day today...

    10. Re:SKY TV set top box by Bill+Dog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Barbie says "Programming is hard!".

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
    11. Re:SKY TV set top box by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      I have one with a VFL clock. I got tired of it and stabbed the VFL tube with an ice pick. It still played movies. It's all it was for.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    12. Re:SKY TV set top box by tacocat · · Score: 1

      I put black electrical tape over the clock face of my old VCR. Then you didn't notice it at all.

    13. Re:SKY TV set top box by zer0skill · · Score: 1

      The end is near! Y2K9 BUG! Apparently the calendar was a bit off, but the computers all knew the real turn of the century.

      --
      --Matt
    14. Re:SKY TV set top box by WeeLad · · Score: 1

      I found this out on Wednesday. Apparently my cable company couldn't justify paying for on of my favourite channels. They didn't even wait until midnight. It was gone early in the morning on the 31st. Now I can't justify paying their bill.

      --
      Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
    15. Re:SKY TV set top box by 2short · · Score: 1


      To be really fair, I blame the idiot engineer who designed the VCR/Microwave/whatever to blink 12 in any circumstance. That's a dumb thing for it to do, regardless of user action.

    16. Re:SKY TV set top box by Myopic · · Score: 1

      offtopic: what kind of hardware do you use for that box, and how do you like the software configuration?

    17. Re:SKY TV set top box by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      WTF is a VFL clock?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    18. Re:SKY TV set top box by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 1

      I experienced the exact same symptoms. (Mythbuntu 8.10, HD-5500, Pinnacle 800i, AMD 64 3500+, nVidia GeForce 6200) Of the /var/log files I checked, I couldn't find a satisfactory explanation. Oddly enough, however, my wife believes the crash happened closer to 10 than midnight.

    19. Re:SKY TV set top box by pyrote · · Score: 1

      >WTF is a VFL clock?

      I'm wagering Vacuum Florescent (technically VFD)... or Victorian Football League but I don't think he would have admitted to ice picking the entire Victorian Football League.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    20. Re:SKY TV set top box by schwinn8 · · Score: 1

      My box:
      Via KT133A chipset (Epox brand board) - yeah, THAT old
      NVidia 5200 video card (using composite-out, ick)
      512MB RAM (DDR, I think? Started at 256MB originally)
      Athlon XP 1800+ CPU with Spire CPU fan (quiet!)
      Hauppauge PVR-150 (on-board MPEG2 encoder version)
      Turtle Beach Santa Cruz soundcard (I think... or similar chipset)
      160GB Seagate HD, I think

      System worked great off a plain Mythbuntu install (aside from using EnvyNG to get the proper NVidia drivers easily loaded). I think I have since run 2 updates on it (ie, not very frequently!) so it's probably "out of date" in that sense. It used to have MythDora 2.32 on it, but I prefer the Ubuntu update system, and am a little more familiar with it than Fedora, so I stuck with it. Besides which, newer Mythdora builds required a DVD-R to install - this machine doesn't have a DVD drive ATM... CDROM only.

      I'm happy with the config (all old computer parts, so it didn't cost me much to put together - only bought the PVR150, rest was leftover hardware). Analog TV takes quite a bit of tweaking to get a "good quality" picture. Still have some more tweaking to do. It compares pretty well versus my Series1 Tivo, though some shows leave a thin black-bar on the left side of the screen only (42" Panny Plasma)... but then the Tivo has been doing that on this TV at Medium or Basic quality levels too. My older 32" Sony Vega CRT didn't have any such issues. I love the auto-commercial skip in Myth, and the rest of the interface is quite simple. I tweaked some of the menus and remote controls a bit manually, but it wasn't technically necessary. I just wanted to fiddle in there a bit, and it was easy enough to do.

      I'm hoping to "run into" a HDMI-capable video card so I can run HDMI to the TV instead (hoping for a PQ improvement) but I'm too cheap to actually spend money on a suitable card, especially with such old hardware. I'm also looking forward to getting GPU-accelleration on video, which is "coming soon" to newer video-card GPUs... so that's keeping me from upgrading ATM too.

    21. Re:SKY TV set top box by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      A bit of a late reply, but no, our Sky+ box (Pace, 80GB/40hr) was fine.

    22. Re:SKY TV set top box by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself, as I forgot my login details briefly. Sky tv set top box crashed precisely at midnight (was sadly watching the newyears TV stuff. Had to switch over to the old fashioned arial to watch the london fireworks. Did this happen to anyone else (thinking unlikely to find many people willing to admit watching the newyear on tv!) (personal excuse is having a young child!)

      At least you lasted until midnight...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:SKY TV set top box by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1
      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  3. Well, after drinking a couple of beers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I let a bottle fall and it broke. Does it count?

    1. Re:Well, after drinking a couple of beers by rishistar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Being more refined, I spilt a Gin & Tonic all over my keyboard. The keyboard doesn't work now - maybe it was the drink, but as it was an MS jobby I'm willing to bet it was a Zune like crash. Crappy Microsoft products.

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    2. Re:Well, after drinking a couple of beers by Sebilrazen · · Score: 5, Funny

      For the parent to copy and paste their post with just the mouse had to have been a nightmare.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    3. Re:Well, after drinking a couple of beers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, I spilled Gin & Tonic on my laptop a few months ago. I had to replace the Keyboard. Frickin' Vista...

    4. Re:Well, after drinking a couple of beers by Beer_Smurf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry to hear about your G&T, were you able to recover much of it?

    5. Re:Well, after drinking a couple of beers by afidel · · Score: 1

      MS peripherals tend to be some of the best. Even on my Linux box I use an MS Internet Keyboard Pro with USB hub (sadly 1.0 with no 2.0 updated version) and a Trackball Optical plugged into the hub (short cord on the trackball).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:Well, after drinking a couple of beers by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Obviously GP composed the post using butterflies...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  4. nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    debian etch, RHEL, centos, all 300 odd servers stayed up. so did irix and solaris boxen from ancient times of the roman empire..

    1. Re:nope... by bluelip · · Score: 4, Interesting

      why doesn't he just set the time back and let the new year happen all over again?

      --

      Yep, I never spell check.
      More incorrect spellings can be found he
    2. Re:nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have a Debian box that crashed at 12 GMT. It's running ntpd and was not able to access the Internet or NTP servers during that time(possibly significant?).

    3. Re:nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      boxen

      Please stop using this word.

    4. Re:nope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That wouldn't be a conclusive test. Servers are connected to networks and have persistent storage. Unless the network behaves like it's the last seconds of 2008 GMT and the disk is in the same state as before the crash, a smooth transition is no indication that the problem wasn't date related.

    5. Re:nope... by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My Debian lenny laptop froze showing 00:59 (CET). Wouldn't respond to mouse, keyboard or ssh.

    6. Re:nope... by jibjibjib · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But if it /did/ crash, then that would be very strong evidence that it /was/ date-related, and then he could find the cause and make sure it didn't happen next time. So, it might still be a useful thing to do.

    7. Re:nope... by HJED · · Score: 1

      you mean like maybe a software bug for handling leap seconds?

      --
      null
    8. Re:nope... by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Informative

      My Debian lenny laptop froze showing 00:59 (CET). Wouldn't respond to mouse, keyboard or ssh.

      Thats right when the leap second hit. Time changes can cause arts to freakout which can be nasty if it's running with realtime priority. Maybe other software does the same?

    9. Re:nope... by zer0skill · · Score: 1

      debian etch, RHEL, centos, all 300 odd servers stayed up. so did irix and solaris boxen from ancient times of the roman empire..

      Same deal at the data center I work at. Debian, Gentoo, FreeBSD 6/7, RedHat, CentOS.... 32 bit and 64 bit alike. Single Core, Dual Core, Quad Core, all various chipsets. No midnight crashes.

      --
      --Matt
    10. Re:nope... by danomac · · Score: 1

      My mythtv and linux-based server and workstation at home stayed up.

      At work, the server running Exchange 2007 had the Information Store service stop, so no mail was sent or received. I didn't notice it until this morning. At least we didn't get spam for a day and a half. Not sure if it's related; it could be.

  5. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No.

    You are alone. Very, very alone.

    1. Re:No. by Esvandiary · · Score: 1, Funny

      It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.

  6. Well this is obvious... by oskard · · Score: 5, Funny

    My Microsoft Windows desktop crashed sometime between 18:59:40 EST (GMT -5:00) and 19:00:00 EST (GMT -5:00) on Dec 31, 2008 which remarkably corresponds to within at most 20 seconds of the New Year in GMT. I have been running this same hardware non-stop for more than 5 hours and other than the occasional BSOD and Windows updates, it has not crashed more than 1 or 2 times in 174,237 seconds of cumulative uptime. Nothing other than spyware, malware, and System Idle Process were running at the time of the crash.

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
    1. Re:Well this is obvious... by oskard · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was just a joke, sorry, I don't want anyone's shit on me :(

      --
      Sigs are for Terrorists.
    2. Re:Well this is obvious... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      So says the person posting an exceptionally lame response as an anonymous coward.

    3. Re:Well this is obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's with all the 4chan idiocy on Slashdot recently?
      4chan is funny when you're a teenage boy, but for those of us that aren't...

    4. Re:Well this is obvious... by Donut+Zeke · · Score: 1

      Fuck, we are anonymous and tripfag don't apply to a site when posting with a name is preferred. Why the hell would you bring shit like /b/ into Slashdot?

    5. Re:Well this is obvious... by Leiterfluid · · Score: 1

      I'm generally a Microsoft booster, but I found your post almost as funny as the VCR comment. I think the AC who called you a troll is the real troll.

    6. Re:Well this is obvious... by repvik · · Score: 1

      "teenage" implies the age thirteen to nineteen. My guess is that none of the 4chan trolls have yet reached the golden age of thirteen.

    7. Re:Well this is obvious... by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I think the original comment is a troll. I think I've been running Windows XP for about a year now without a system crash, unless you count the time my hard drive died. I personally think the reason Linux is so crash-free is it doesn't have many ordinary people using it. I also think, crashes and all, my hardware has more uptime with Windows than Linux because my hardware has no driver support, and therefore zero uptime with Linux. That includes hardware that used to work with older versions of the same brand of Linux.

    8. Re:Well this is obvious... by NoobixCube · · Score: 2, Funny

      This thread is relevant to my interests...

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    9. Re:Well this is obvious... by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ever heard of OLPC project? Heeere's the result!

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    10. Re:Well this is obvious... by Ecuador · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The original comment was not a troll since he could have been referring to Windows Vista, or even a typical user's infested Windows XP.
      I also have an XP at home mainly as a HTPC, and it has never crashed in about a year of running 24/7 (similar record to my Suse desktop), but I would certainly not call myself a typical user (I don't have even an anti-virus installed). My friends' PC's that I have to fix from time to time though, are a much different story, due to the "typical" users inability to protect themselves from viruses, adware and installation of crap software.
      Now, Vista is a different "beast". I got one in the office for cases where a VM is not enough and the damn thing hangs and reboots randomly from the start, with only Visual Studio and Office installed. SP1 has not helped, so I still have to do everything I need from Windows on a VM. I must say that machine matches the original posts premise perfectly.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    11. Re:Well this is obvious... by geekboy642 · · Score: 1

      Don't mind the children. Eventually the unwashed masses will forget about V, Anonymous, and Scientology. Then they'll have some other set of memes to spout on unrelated websites in the hopes of appearing "in" or "cool".

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    12. Re:Well this is obvious... by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 1

      You must be new here

    13. Re:Well this is obvious... by jnork · · Score: 1

      LOL!

      Well, I thought it was funny.

      --
      Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
    14. Re:Well this is obvious... by dmitriy88 · · Score: 1

      perhaps

      but that won't stop me from being an elitist douche canoe towards people that visit other, inferior websites. makes me proud of my vaguely-defined online 'community'.

      feels good man

    15. Re:Well this is obvious... by miknix · · Score: 1

      Thank you, you made my day.

    16. Re:Well this is obvious... by tsa · · Score: 1

      I'm old. What do /b/ and 4chan mean?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    17. Re:Well this is obvious... by Harik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey now, 4chan /b/ is funny sometimes.

      Hang on, I'll get you an example.

      nevermind.

    18. Re:Well this is obvious... by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      I find my Vista laptop with SP2 pre-beta generally a lot more stable. May be worth a shot..?

    19. Re:Well this is obvious... by Ohrion · · Score: 1

      Why is parent marked flamebait?

    20. Re:Well this is obvious... by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Because a troll had mod points? :)

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    21. Re:Well this is obvious... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I find my Vista laptop with SP2 pre-beta generally a lot more stable. May be worth a shot..?

      Well, I'd have to scale up my half-drawn plans for a desktop trebuchet (to be made from UniStrut and other debris from the Instrumentation Workshop). Or maybe I'd need to make up a couple of kilos of a fertilizer-gunpowder, and get hold of a pup joint of 9_5/8" casing. Both of those would be capable of giving it a decent shot. Much harder to make it to orbit, but you don't need to get to orbit to achieve a sufficiently destructive return to Earth. (New laptop ; Vista pre-installed ; can I get hold of an install disc for XP from a dead machine in the office? 'nuff said?)

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    22. Re:Well this is obvious... by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      I sympathise, but... new laptop? Good luck with the drivers.

      I thought I was going to have to do the same, but in stark contrast to my last laptop, I haven't had any performance issues. 1.83GHz Core Duo and 3GB of RAM, in case you were wondering.

    23. Re:Well this is obvious... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I sympathise, but... new laptop? Good luck with the drivers.

      Well, it is a HP, and they're still apparently offering most of their machines that are sold for business with an XP upgrade. I didn't have any great difficulty finding a set of drivers described as being for Win2K/ XP/ Vista on HP's website. The big difficulty has been in finding a legal copy of XP to install on it. When I first got the machine and created the restore discs, I did a test install of Win2K (of which I have a legal OEM copy) and everything I used worked, apart from the fingerprint reader. So that seems settled.

      I can't say that I'd be bothered if some esoterica didn't work - USB mass storage, SVGA graphics, keyboard, mouse ; anything else is pretty much luxury rather than necessity. I don't do games (that matter) ; I don't do high-end graphics ; I don't do video ; and pretty much any machine on the market today is overpowered for real-world uses.

      That said, I've just finished re-building the wife's desktop (the normal home of the legit Win2K) onto a new motherboard, so if I buy a SATA drive, I might be able to see if there's a noticeable speed difference between the two ; I doubt it ("noticeable" of course means a real-world difference of more than about 2x ; lesser tweaks are rarely seen ; we didn't see much change from changing to a dual-core processor, but we saw a big difference from going from 1/4GB to 1GB of main memory).

      Doesn't time fly - I just realised that the "new" laptop is nearly a year old now. Well, it's got another 3 years of working lifetime in front of it.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  7. No problems by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nope. Everything's fine here in New Ampst

    <carrier lost>

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:No problems by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      You guys still on Dialup? Want an AOL coaster?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:No problems by JadeNB · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope. Everything's fine here in New Ampst

      <carrier lost>

      I guess the real lesson here is that it's spelled New Amst

      <carrier lost>

    3. Re:No problems by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Weird.

      Call me a slashbot if you want, but I always post what I'm actually thinking as opposed to what the community as a whole might, and it's usually worked out for me as far as karma goes, as long as my argument is well-written, etc.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  8. Adding some data by sjames · · Score: 1

    Not really enough data to tell yet, but my Fedora 8 system had no issues at all. I'm also in GMT-5. Dual Xeon 32 bit system. E7520 chipset (Intel).

    What sort of crash, just froze? Kernel OOPS, spontaneous reset?

    1. Re:Adding some data by aputerguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Froze - couldn't ping or ssh or get console response. I know the time cuz last maillog entry was 18:59:40 and the clock (on my emacs session) said 18:59 at time of crash. Hardware is: ASUS P4P Rebooted without ever but required me to manually poweroff

    2. Re:Adding some data by sjames · · Score: 1

      Any chance of a very short power glitch? I have one machine that is quite touchy about that.

    3. Re:Adding some data by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone let off an EMP bomb amongst the fireworks, just to give people the willies

      "I tell you, mine and my mums computers both crashed at exactly midnight. It's a conspiracy I tell you. I'm never coming out of the basement again!"

    4. Re:Adding some data by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A bottle rocket hitting a transformer isn't out of the question. If it hits near the high voltage terminals it may briefly arc.

    5. Re:Adding some data by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      I think that's what happened to my box. The hillbillies that live behind me were firing off fireworks and doing something strange with bright lights (I was sick and it woke me up, so my details are somewhat sketchy). The power was out when I woke up, and when it finally came back on, one of my boxes wouldn't come back up, so I pulled the power supply and took a look inside and every capacitor was blown. Later on when I was walking my dog, I noticed scorch marks all around a nearby transformer. I suppose technically that doesn't count for the numerology based anecdotal stories that are on topic, but whatever.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
  9. Errrrrrr by segedunum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why don't you actually boot it, or failing that, take the hard drive out, perhaps look at some logs and actually find out rather than aligning it with a certain set of mystical circumstances?

    1. Re:Errrrrrr by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because thinking rationally is hard.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Errrrrrr by aputerguy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I rebooted it and it went just fine. I looked at the logs and saw now errors. Last entry was in /var/log/maillog at 18:59:40 (not an error). So, not sure how to figure it out - tempted to try to replicate though by setting time back to 18:59 on 12/31/08 (and shutting off ntpd)

    3. Re:Errrrrrr by LunarCrisis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Especially today.

      --
      Mr. Period: Nine is the one that's right by ten!
      Nine: One day I will kill him. Then, I will be Ten.
    4. Re:Errrrrrr by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Its more fun to be paranoid. Join the club. No wait, we don't trust you to join you might be one of 'them'.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:Errrrrrr by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      Because when the computer just dies like that, there usually are no logs to explain it. If only because the computer died before they could be written.

    6. Re:Errrrrrr by powerspike · · Score: 1

      totaly, i make a living from people who don't!

    7. Re:Errrrrrr by narcberry · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, he needs a faster hard drive.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    8. Re:Errrrrrr by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Well if it helps my Dish HDTV DVR crashed mysteriously exactly 20 seconds before the ball dropped. Came right back up, and none of my other Dish boxes seemed to crash, nor did my linux server.

  10. My phone did it by cr_nucleus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My phone froze right after midnight and i had to remove the battery to make it work again.
    It's a SE w810i.

    1. Re:My phone did it by z_gringo · · Score: 1

      Mine did also. it is a Sony Ericsson w910i.


      It is finally working again. but for a while, I thought it had died permanently. I took the battery out a few times and turned it back on, it would freeze. I gave up for a while and later I was able to turn it on and it worked with no problem. This was about 22:30 Central European time.

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    2. Re:My phone did it by fnord_uk · · Score: 1

      Do you guys remember the April bug in the older SE phones? It happened on two succesive models, two years running. If you accessed the Calendar at any time during April, using the hotkeys to get there, it locked up and needed the battery pulling. If you accessed the Calendar via the longer approach, delving into the menu, it worked fine. When May came around, the hotkey access to Calendar returned to normal.

      It was quite bizarre, but I was actually looking forward to the following April to see if the bug was still there ;-)

      fnord

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.
  11. Probably coincidence. by Thiez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > Could this be a coincidence

    Yes. People are wired to see causality everywhere, even where there is none. Had your server crashed a week ago you wouldn't think anything of it (maybe 5% of all servers mysteriously crashed exactly one week ago, but because it was an 'ordinary' day nobody noticed). Anyway, since you noticed your server crashed at new year and reported it on /., and with 6 billion people on this planet we will soon hear stories about other computers that mysteriously crashed around midnight. Not because there has to be anything special, but because computers are crashing all the time and new year (and your post) made it appear special.

    I doubt it has anything to do with leap seconds, if your computer ran for 6 years it survived the leap second of 2005.

    1. Re:Probably coincidence. by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes. People are wired to see causality everywhere, even where there is none.

      So you see a pattern in people's behavior? ;)

    2. Re:Probably coincidence. by aputerguy · · Score: 1

      I agree - but seems like an awfully unlikely coincidence. By my math, chance of a crash in any given 20 second period is just under 1 in 5 million: (2 crashes in 2237 days)/(2237*24*60*60 seconds) * (20 second interval). Seems suspicious to me...

    3. Re:Probably coincidence. by Snowblindeye · · Score: 5, Informative

      People are wired to see causality everywhere, even where there is none.

      Very true. There is an interesting book by Leonard Mlodinow called "The Drunkard's Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives" which is all about the way humans misinterpret random events to see patterns that are not there.

      http://www.randomhouse.com/pantheon/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780375424045

      http://www.amazon.com/Drunkards-Walk-Randomness-Rules-Lives/dp/0375424040

    4. Re:Probably coincidence. by Thiez · · Score: 5, Informative

      Let's use that number. The odds of a server failing during the 20 seconds before midnight on 31 december are 1 in 5 million. Suppose there are 50 millions servers. Simple math says the chance of your server crashing is extremely small (1 in 5 million), but there will be about 10 people who have a crashed server. That is normal (using your number there will be 10 servers crashing every 20 seconds every day of the year) but those 10 people will think it 'an awfully unlikely coincidence', while the other 15379200 server crashes during a year are ignored.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the new year can't have anything to do with the crash, I just think it's way more likely that your server crashed randomly and you see causality where none exists.

    5. Re:Probably coincidence. by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 4, Informative

      In 50 million servers in america (number for number's sake), that makes 10 people who crashed at midnight. Most of them were IT people given the nature of owning a server, and IT people often read slashdot.

      Hence, you, and the 7-9 other people who shared your experience... and nobody else.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    6. Re:Probably coincidence. by gpw213 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Assuming your math is correct (I didn't bother to check it), that would be the odds of a random server failing in a random 20 second interval.

      You didn't pick a random server, you picked one already known to have crashed. And you didn't pick a random 20 second interval either. The odds of that server crashing in that 20 second interval was 100%, because it was already known to have happened. This is a classic mis-application of statistics.

      Admittedly, the interval right at New Year's is a bit suspicious, since there is some specific code to handle leap years, etc. But given that there wasn't a rash of outages reported, I am going along with the coincidence theory.

      --
      However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. -- Winston Churchill
    7. Re:Probably coincidence. by retchdog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's not a misapplication. It's a textbook-standard application of statistics, which looks at the probability of an event (which did occur) happening under a "null hypothesis", in this case including 1) no extraordinary event associated with year roll-over (no time dependence); 2) all servers are stochastically identical (i.e. they each have the same failure rate).

      The hypotheses are a bit strong, but it's not a mis-application.

      Statistics often answers the question "How likely was that to have happened without an extraordinary explanation?" By nature, this deals with events of "100% probability" as you misleadingly call them.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    8. Re:Probably coincidence. by the_B0fh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Once, at the end of the staff meeting I was holding, I casually mentioned that I noticed that 40% of all sick leave were taken on Fridays and Mondays.

      Immediately, 2 people jumped out and said it was an outrage, and that we should do something about it. That something like this shouldn't be happening.

      *sigh*

    9. Re:Probably coincidence. by gpw213 · · Score: 1
      It is inappropriate to ask "how likely was it for this server to have crashed", when there is nothing special about this server other than it is the one we already know has crashed. Once we carefully pick this crashed server from the set of all servers in the world, the "null hypothesis" is gone.

      The correct question is "how likely was it for any server to have crashed", and I think the answer is that it was fairly likely.

      It is unclear if being New Year's made a crash more likely, but I think we can agree it made it far more likely that we would hear about it.

      --
      However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. -- Winston Churchill
    10. Re:Probably coincidence. by wcb4 · · Score: 1

      Very old anecdote. Likely older than you. Don't make shit up.

      --
      I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
    11. Re:Probably coincidence. by dbIII · · Score: 1
      I had an APC brand UPS go down sometime around midnight. It's most likely a coincidence becuase without power failures UPS's get bored and find creative ways to shut down while everything on mains stays up :(

      What is possible is somebody in electrical transmission decided it was a good time to take something offline for maintainance and a resulting power glitch made the UPS think it should shut down to save the web servers from a possible spike. It doesn't look like a failed battery test unless an LED is out.

    12. Re:Probably coincidence. by nine-times · · Score: 1

      That is normal (using your number there will be 10 servers crashing every 20 seconds every day of the year) but those 10 people will think it 'an awfully unlikely coincidence', while the other 15379200 server crashes during a year are ignored.

      Yes, this is a much-misunderstood issue with statistics. Just because something is unlikely doesn't mean that it won't happen. Just because two things are unlikely to happen together doesn't mean it's more than a coincidence when they do happen together. Unlikely things just happen. They happen often. You just can't figure out which unlikely thing is going to happen when.

      So anyway, why would it crash 20 seconds before midnight? It seems to me like that makes it less likely to be causal, since a computer probably wouldn't anticipate a leap second 20 in the future and decide to crash ahead of time. I guess it's possible...

    13. Re:Probably coincidence. by AbyssWyrm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think your logic is incorrect. The original poster did not say "my server went down around midnight, could this be a coincidence?" rather he said "my server, which has a particularly excellent track record of not going down, did so near midnight with very high precision. Could this not be a coincidence?" Given that this happening at any specific time is very unlikely compared to the relative abundance of rollover errors, this is a very legitimate hypothesis. Furthermore your argument is essentially saying that anything with a non-zero probability of occurring randomly is probably not a coincidence. Otherwise, instead of comparing to some 50 million servers you ought to be comparing to a much smaller number of servers meeting the description of the original poster's. I don't think you pose any legitimate argument that this is coincidental, and it strikes me as very probable that it is not.

    14. Re:Probably coincidence. by retchdog · · Score: 1

      It depends on the context.

      For the owner of the server, the relevant event is, in fact, his server (or one of his small number of servers) failing.

      For a slashdot reader, the relevant event is a reader-submitted story about server failure being accepted.

      We can easily have significance for the first event, but not the second. As you kindly point out, the holiday influences the second event but not the first. For all we know, the server isn't even real; just slash-hype.

      Anyway, this has nothing to do with the "probability being 100% because it already happened"; that was my only point, as pedantic as it is.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    15. Re:Probably coincidence. by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      I had an APC brand UPS go down sometime around midnight. It's most likely a coincidence becuase without power failures UPS's get bored and find creative ways to shut down while everything on mains stays up :(

      I have an APC UPS on my Tivo, cable box, Link Theatre, and WII that started shutting off after I added the WII. I thought I'd overloaded it with the WII, so I moved everything except the Tivo and WII. When That didn't solve the problem, I bought a new, identical APC UPS. Sure enough, within a couple weeks I'd come home and find it powered off. Then one day I was home and my cat jumped onto my entertainment center. A few seconds later, off went the UPS. It seems that when my big 33" CRT TV died and I just dropped in a little 20" replacement, the entertainment center became a good playground. My cat was actually stepping on the power button while running around behind the TV.

      I'm convinced the whole zune thing is a feline conspiracy.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    16. Re:Probably coincidence. by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Older than Dilbert?

    17. Re:Probably coincidence. by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's anything unreasonable about asking Slashdot posters, many of whom had Linux boxes running across the year rollover, whether they had any problems, just to get an idea of whether it was 10 servers crashing in those 20 seconds or a thousand.

      So this individual crash probably has nothing to do with timing software. We'd have said the same of the individual Zune crashes. Fortunately for our collective knowledge and understanding plenty of people thought to ask the question.

    18. Re:Probably coincidence. by aputerguy · · Score: 1

      As the OP and having read about several hundred other stable machines in multiple timezones crashing at that precise second, I do not believe that is a coincidence. Several people have reported 10 or more machines crashing at precisely 00:00:00 GMT -- it is so unlikely that hundreds of stable servers crashed precisely at this moment, that I would bet anything that this is NOT a coincidence. Plus, the last time my machine encountered a leap second, it was running FC1 with a very different kernel so that does not prove anything.

    19. Re:Probably coincidence. by aputerguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But there have now been reports (just adding up the comments posted on slashdot and emails to me) of hundreds of machines going down at precisely 00:00:00 GMT (across multiple timezones). That combined set of data points plus the obvious potential issue of a leap second being introduces at that precise time would seem to make your coincidence theory astronomically unlikely.

    20. Re:Probably coincidence. by aputerguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I only said that the last log was 20 seconds before midnight and that based on my clock display, it crashed no later than 00:00:00. I would bet any amount of money that the actual crash was at the 00:00:00 GMT changeover.

    21. Re:Probably coincidence. by aputerguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well given that there have been reports of several hundred such crashes, I guess it can't be a coincidence unless there are a billion or so Linux servers ;)

    22. Re:Probably coincidence. by aputerguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      But there are several hundred other reported crashes at precisely that moment... still a coincidence? I would bet NOT.

    23. Re:Probably coincidence. by aputerguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahhh but in 2005, it was running FC1 with a 2.4 kernel (I believe). So, the issue may very well not have been present 3 years ago...

    24. Re:Probably coincidence. by the_B0fh · · Score: 2

      You are very stupid, aren't you? I can't say this in my staff meeting because someone else said that previously? My god, quick, someone, anyone, go ban all books on quotes.

    25. Re:Probably coincidence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Published by Random House?

    26. Re:Probably coincidence. by c-reus · · Score: 1

      Having 50 million servers and 1 in 5 million chance of a server crashing does not equal 10 crashed servers.

    27. Re:Probably coincidence. by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      It was for just that reason that I had my computer excommunicated.

    28. Re:Probably coincidence. by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think your logic is incorrect. The original poster did not say "my server went down around midnight, could this be a coincidence?" rather he said "my server, which has a particularly excellent track record of not going down, did so near midnight with very high precision. Could this not be a coincidence?" Given that this happening at any specific time is very unlikely compared to the relative abundance of rollover errors, this is a very legitimate hypothesis. Furthermore your argument is essentially saying that anything with a non-zero probability of occurring randomly is probably not a coincidence. Otherwise, instead of comparing to some 50 million servers you ought to be comparing to a much smaller number of servers meeting the description of the original poster's. I don't think you pose any legitimate argument that this is coincidental, and it strikes me as very probable that it is not.

      If you want to show that this is anything but a coincidence, you either need to show that this happened to more than one server, or you need to demonstrate the mechsnism. At this point we have exactly one server and we can't point to a specific bug. Until that changes, "coincidence" is the best answer.

      For instance, this could be an entirely local problem. The motherboard or some other hardware component is beginning to fail, and the server will start crashing more frequently until that component dies completely. Or it could have been caused by a power surge, or a problem resulting from some bad wiring. Or the guy who manages the server above it came in to swap out some hardware and accidentally unplugged the server, and won't admit to it. (I have a former boss who did exactly that, after he went to work for a customer.)

      Sure, it could still be related to the time. Without any additional evidence, though, it's just speculation.

    29. Re:Probably coincidence. by sac13 · · Score: 1

      People are wired to see causality everywhere, even where there is none.

      Wow... if one wanted, that would be a good line to start a nice CO2/global warming flame war... :)

    30. Re:Probably coincidence. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If 5% of all servers crashed randomly in any arbitrarily-chosen 20-second interval, for every server with an uptime of 5 years you'd need a server that crashed some 788,832 times in that length of time (every 200 seconds, on the average) to even things out (assuming there was a leap day in there somewhere).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    31. Re:Probably coincidence. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      You didn't pick a random server, you picked one already known to have crashed. And you didn't pick a random 20 second interval either. The odds of that server crashing in that 20 second interval was 100%, because it was already known to have happened.

      WTF? By your interpretation of statistics, the coin I just flipped had 100% odds of landing on heads. That does me a whole fucking lot of good if I don't know the outcome ahead of time, and it's bloody useless when I need to predict the outcome of the next flip.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    32. Re:Probably coincidence. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      40% of all sick leave were taken on Fridays and Mondays

      Ahh, but do you mean sick leave taken or sick leave accumulated? If I take 40% of my earned sick leave on Mondays and Fridays and let the rest simply accumulate, I've spent 100% of my used sick leave on Mondays and Fridays.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  12. Google searching by frinkster · · Score: 1

    As of this morning, Google thinks I have a spyware problem and every time I've tried to do a search I get the sorry page with a captcha to complete the search.

    It sure scared me - how does a Linux box and a Macbook get infected while they're both asleep? I've done all the checking I can and I'm pretty sure my network is clean.

    1. Re:Google searching by moniker127 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As far as I've been able to tell, this means that there have been a lot of requests from your subnet, enough that it looks like some sort of bot.

    2. Re:Google searching by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      It's been doing it to me too today while using the define: query. But it does it quite often with that query or the calculator, which makes it sound like they don't want to let you use these. That's annoying.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    3. Re:Google searching by Spad · · Score: 1

      Drives me insane at work (I work in the NHS) because we have up to 1.3 million users running through about 5 ip addresses (Unavoidable NHS N3 internet gateways).

    4. Re:Google searching by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Maybe your IP address changed and you've been given one which was previously used by a spyware-infested box.

    5. Re:Google searching by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you were given a very badly infected "zombie" machines IP by your IP provider overnight.

      If you give your IP to sites like http://http//www.completewhois.com or http://www.senderbase.org/ they may give very good clue since zombies mostly end up on such lists. Of course if you aren't victim of some sort of monopoly, it is best to find a better managed ISP with zero tolerance to both spammers and zombies on their subnet. Not every IP address/block is equal on web since the early dial up times. At one time, while I was using cable ISP, I had 5 kb/sec virus/worm traffic hitting me while I am using OS X. It really bugged me a lot and eventually sites like slashdot really went paranoid about my IP and I was disallowed from posting once.

  13. Proximity card system by eli+pabst · · Score: 1

    We had our proximity card access system completely shit the bed on the 31st. Don't know if it was a leap year issue or if it was just coincidence, but it caused widespread outages and was a major PITA.

  14. Given an infinite number of server monkeys... by melonman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many servers in total are watched over by people posting on Slashdot? I suspect that the answer is high enough that it would be amazing if at least one of them didn't crash within 20 seconds of the New Year.

    --
    Virtually serving coffee
  15. I Second That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    My parents are using a MythTV box on Fedora 8 (Athlon XP1700+) and it also froze up last night at the same time (right in the middle of a recording :-( ). That was my first thought, too, because that would have been midnight UTC. However, after restarting it today, is has frozen again.

    I can't see anything in the logs, but the recording ended at 19:59 AST. It should have kept going for another hour.

    I have a second MythTV/Fedora 8 box (P3, 1GHz) that I use and never had any trouble with it last night.

    1. Re:I Second That by aputerguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Interesting, I run mythtv too but wasn't recording at the time of the crash. Has been stable since I rebooted a couple of hours ago.

    2. Re:I Second That by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I did some comparisons between these 2 boxes and found the following. We were both recording the same program.

      messages - both had entries from the channel change script at about 19:29:50 AST.

      The next message on the good box was "Dec 31 19:59:59 localhost kernel: Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC." This message was not on the box that froze.

      When I stat'ed the recording, it was last modified at 19:59:59.431 -0400.

    3. Re:I Second That by athakur999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My Mythbuntu-based HTPC also froze up last night.

      This is what my /var/log/messages file looks like:
      Dec 31 16:03:45 puppet -- MARK --
      Dec 31 16:23:45 puppet -- MARK --
      Dec 31 16:43:45 puppet -- MARK --
      Dec 31 17:03:45 puppet -- MARK --
      Dec 31 17:23:45 puppet -- MARK --
      Dec 31 17:43:45 puppet -- MARK --
      (... below is when I noticed the box was hung and restarted it ...)
      Jan 1 14:02:31 puppet syslogd 1.5.0#2ubuntu6: restart.
      Jan 1 14:02:31 puppet kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.6.27-9-generic

      Every 20 minutes, I get those "-- MARK --" messages and the last one is at 5:43PM local time which would be 11:43PM UTC (also my system clock is set to UTC, not local time). The next "-- MARK --" should have been at 12:03AM UTC, so there's a good chance the leap second messed something up.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  16. No, but you've got 6 days to upgrade that machine! by ZG-Rules · · Score: 1

    Fedora 8 EOL is 7th January, you should think about upgrading it to something newer...

    Fedora 8 EOL Announcement

    And FWIW, I've got a couple of hundred machines running varieties of Linux (but no Fedora 8) and I haven't seen any silly reboots. I think you might be making mountains out of a coincidental mole hill.

  17. test by wizardforce · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could this be a coincidence or was there some 2008/2009 rollover issue going on here?

    set the system time back a few mins before the crash occured and see if your server crashes again... otherwise it's idle speculation

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    1. Re:test by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First good idea in this whole discussion. Don't forget the hardware clock as well.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amen brother.

        5 of about 70 of our production servers died at exactly midnight GMT. No point in speculation until some testing is done.

    3. Re:test by LunarCrisis · · Score: 5, Funny

      You guys aren't thinking far enough. A time machine is clearly in order!

      --
      Mr. Period: Nine is the one that's right by ten!
      Nine: One day I will kill him. Then, I will be Ten.
    4. Re:test by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > set the system time back a few mins before the crash occured and see if your server crashes again

      A hardware tech, a software tech, and their manager were driving to a conference, and the road was pretty mountainous. Just after they passed the highest point, the brakes suddenly gave out. As the car accelerated faster and faster, steering became more and more difficult, but fortunately there were no other cars on the road, and finally they reached the bottom.

      When the car finally came to a stop, the hardware guy says, "Well, I guess we'd better pop open the hood and see if we can find the problem." The manager says, "No, I've got my cellphone right here, we'll just call for a tow." But the software guy says, "What are you guys talking about? We've got to get this car back to the top of the mountain and see we can get it to happen again!"

      Actually, though, to be a proper experiment, you need to get ten thousand identical servers, set the clocks back on five thousand of them, and see if there's a statistically significant correlation between having the clock set back and crashing. Also, the guy who checks whether they've crashed or not isn't allowed to know which ones had the clock set back.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    5. Re:test by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      You guys aren't thinking far enough. A time machine is clearly in order!

      I already thought of that next year.

    6. Re:test by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      What are the odds that a computer system that some Slashdot user manages would HAPPEN to crash on New Years Eve?

      Say there are 100,000 slashdot readers, and 30% of them manage servers, ranging from 1 to 100 servers, with the average being 3.3 Servers. So the slashdot reader population manages 100,000 servers. (Adjust numbers to suit your beliefs.)

      Even with the submitter's "great stats" of 1-2 failures in 2237 days, you're talking about a server failing every 1500 days (4 years), or 25,000 readers' servers failing every year. So nearly 70 servers fail a day, and the odds of one of those failing near midnight (in some time zone or UTC) seem like near certainty.

      So, nothing to see here, move along...

    7. Re:test by GXTi · · Score: 1

      And make sure it has a leap seconds file configured properly.

    8. Re:test by lintux · · Score: 1

      Also, don't forget to set the kernel flag that enables the leap-second code. It's quite likely that this was the cause, and the kernel won't know by itself that it should insert one. See adjtimex(2) for more information.

      It's definitely possible that some program couldn't cope with time jumping back. Actually, it may be just as easy to just test this by manually stepping back in time.

  18. No problems here by unix_geek_512 · · Score: 1

    I haven't had a single Linux, BSD or *nix server crash like that and all Fedora 8 systems survived last night out of a pool of a several hundred servers ( all Linux, BSD and *nix ).

    It sounds like unstable hardware.

    Semper Fi

  19. driver by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Zune crash was due to a specific hardware driver. Perhaps you also have an unusual hardware driver on your setup that was affected?

  20. Ubuntu 8.10 - MythTV Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was watching the new years London celebrations on my Ubuntu 8.10 MythTV box. With 10 seconds to go to midnight, it crashed. Missed the start of the fireworks.

    I think it may have happened around midnight before, so not necessarily an New Year problem.

    1. Re:Ubuntu 8.10 - MythTV Crash by GWRedDragon · · Score: 1

      Did it bother you that since you were watching 'live' TV in myth there was a multi-second delay in playback? Just think, when you yelled HAPPY NEW YEAR and started the celebration, you were actually a few seconds late.

  21. No issues here. by ckdake · · Score: 1

    Bunches of Linux servers (200+) running CentoOS, RHEL, CentOS, Gentoo, and a few others, all with recent versions of NTP, and all said something like:

    Dec 31 18:59:59 aurora Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC

    when GMT rolled over.

    1. Re:No issues here. by xmas2003 · · Score: 1

      Exact same thing here ... non-event and nifty to see the syslog event about the leap-second ...

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
  22. RiteAid pharmacy y2k09 bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On 12/30/08, I submitted a request with my pharmacy to refill a prescription to pick up on 12/31/08, and received the following email, verbatim:
     

    Your Rite Aid prescription confirmation
    Greetings from the riteaidonlinestore.com pharmacy,

    Thank you for choosing to refill your Rite Aid prescription(s) online at the riteaidonlinestore.com pharmacy.
    The following refills have been sent to the Rite Aid store that you selected, along with your preferred pick-up date and time:

    Patient Name: ********
        Rx ******** ********
        Rx ******** ********

    Rite Aid Store Location:
        ********
        ********, ********
        ********
        ********

    Pick-up Date and Time:
        Thursday December 31, 2009 at 3:00 pm

    If you have any questions regarding your prescription, please contact your local Rite Aid directly at ********. Please note that you will need to pay for this prescription when you pick it up. If you have selected to self-pay for this medication, you will pay Rite Aid's price.

    Thank you for visiting the riteaidonlinestore.com pharmacy. We invite you to visit us for your other prescription needs and great deals on nonprescription items. We look forward to assisting you!

    Some things to note: I've got to wait until next christmas to pick up my drugs, and they were so concerned about patient privacy, they obscured all my contact information, prescription numbers and the pharmacy's phone numbers with asterisks. (I didn't do that myself!)

    So, I wonder if their log files are full of java.lang.Exception logs today...

    --ob

  23. Mysteriously coincidental with this event.. by vorlich · · Score: 5, Funny

    my cat hid under the bed at almost 25 seconds into the New Year. Right after he heard the first of the fireworks. However he did restart normally about 22 minutes later after a soothing saucer of milk. I wonder if ...

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
    1. Re:Mysteriously coincidental with this event.. by dkf · · Score: 2, Funny

      my cat hid under the bed at almost 25 seconds into the New Year. Right after he heard the first of the fireworks. However he did restart normally about 22 minutes later after a soothing saucer of milk. I wonder if ...

      FYI, servers don't restart if you give them a saucer of milk, no matter how soothing it is.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    2. Re:Mysteriously coincidental with this event.. by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that his server is afraid of loud noises?

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    3. Re:Mysteriously coincidental with this event.. by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Are you on GMT? Then it might have been the leap second. Otherwise, no. Although I wonder what took 25 seconds to fail.

    4. Re:Mysteriously coincidental with this event.. by ZerdZerd · · Score: 1

      Strange, my cat did the same thing. I wonder if it's more than a coincidence. Maybe they have a bug?

      --
      I'm not insane! My mother had me tested.
    5. Re:Mysteriously coincidental with this event.. by tengu1sd · · Score: 3, Funny
      my cat hid under the bed

      Is that a cat-5 or cat-6? Is re-installing M.I.L.K. a normal procedure? I understand some models have patches available after a fix, is your model fixed?

    6. Re:Mysteriously coincidental with this event.. by clone53421 · · Score: 1
      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  24. It would be fair... by Chysn · · Score: 1

    ...to at least tell us why it crashed. Hard drive failure? Your fan gave out? Some sort of kernel panic or MCE? Was there a black cat in the server room? Maybe there's more Zune in it than you think.

    --
    --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
    -- See?
    1. Re:It would be fair... by aputerguy · · Score: 1

      Sorry - I was trying to keep the post short. Not a hardware failure in that it booted right up when I noticed it the next morning. No kernel panics or any other evidence of why it crashed.

    2. Re:It would be fair... by Chysn · · Score: 1

      The system was just frozen, then? If so, could be a bad DIMM. They don't usually just fail after years of use, but it's possible. I've been machines with bad DIMMs just freeze, and then reboot like nothing happened.

      Anyway, no need to keep the post short. What's the hardware? What logs did you already check?

      --
      --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
      -- See?
    3. Re:It would be fair... by aputerguy · · Score: 1

      Hardware is ASUS P4PE. 2 1-TB Seagate SATA hardrives, 1 200MB PATA drive. 2GB DDR. 1 pchdtv5500 card, 1 winfast 2000XP tv card, 1 nVidia 6200 graphics card. Checked syslog, cron, maillog, mythbackend.log, wtmp,

    4. Re:It would be fair... by Chysn · · Score: 1

      Others have mentioned a power surge, but I'd still run diagnostics on the DIMMs. That's at least something that you can DO something about very easily.

      Just for fun, also check /var/log/messages and last reboot. If Fedora noticed a problem before going down, it might show up there.

      --
      --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
      -- See?
  25. Debian by SanjuroE · · Score: 1

    Actually my server crashed between 00:59:52 and 01:03:53 CET so that is also very close to midnight GMT.

    Like aputerguy it has been running continously for several years now, although unlike him the server was pretty busy running backups at the time of the crash.

    It is running Debian testing and at that time Debian kernel 2.6.26-11.

    1. Re:Debian by lukas84 · · Score: 1

      An internal testing machine that's still on 2.6.21 crashed this night at around 01:00:00 CET.

      Production machines with newer kernels didn't have any issues.

    2. Re:Debian by legojenn · · Score: 1

      awww nothing eventful happened to my old PIII mini-Optiplex 110 running CentOS that I use as a home router/file server.

      [jsd@www ~]$ uptime
        15:36:53 up 64 days, 9:16, 1 user, load average: 2.47, 1.86, 1.57
      [jsd@www ~]$

      The only weird thing that happens is that Apache stops for no good reason every once in a while.

      I'm jealous that I don't get to participate in the conspiracy theory. If my system did go down, I'd use the time offline to put Slackware back on the server. CentOS keeps working so I let it go. Oh well!

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    3. Re:Debian by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Jan 02, 2009 at 0:15:16 up 119 days 10 hours 33 minutes
      Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz)
      Sempron 1.8 GHz, 2GB RAM

      Jan 02, 2009 at 0:17:55 up 175 days, 12 hours, 51 minutes
      RHEL 3
      Celeron 2 GHz, 1GB RAM

  26. billing software by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    A billing program I maintain failed to run today, I won't figure out why until tomorrow when I go back to work. Its no big deal but probably not a coinky-dink that it failed on new years day.

  27. UK ISP crashed at 2356 on 31 Dec! by rapiddescent · · Score: 1
    one of the larger UK ISPs Nildram.net had a massive problem with its Radius authentication servers at 2356Hrs GMT on Hogmany. Total pain in the arse because we were about to VOIP friends etc. We tried to switch to our backup 3G net connection but the phone networks were totally flooded with all those "happy new year" txt messages, vidcalls and so on.

    anyone know if it was Z2K-like?

  28. Sandisk Sansa e260 4GB Media Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had purchased a Sandisk Sansa e260 4GB Media Player for my father-in-law for x-mas and it worked on thru the 30th, but it wouldn't turn-on on the 31st all day. We finally managed to turn it on today. Interesting...

    1. Re:Sandisk Sansa e260 4GB Media Player by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

      Very likely it uses the same clock driver as the 30GB Zune (which had the exact same behaviour)

    2. Re:Sandisk Sansa e260 4GB Media Player by peterhoeg · · Score: 1

      Had a similar experience - bought a new Samsung CC03 mobile on 31/12 (cheapest I could find) to serve as a temporary replacement phone.

      It refused to let me set the date to 31/12. It was fine with 30/12 and then telling me it was Tuesday and after midnight it showed Thursday 1/1 properly, so for some reason 31/12 did not exist.

  29. Crashy box crashes, you say? by Yath · · Score: 4, Funny

    it has not crashed more than 1 or 2 times in 2237 days of cumulative uptime

    Apparently, you have pre-existing stability problems with this box. The fact that it crashed yet again yesterday should come as no great surprise.

    --
    I always mod up spelling trolls.
    1. Re:Crashy box crashes, you say? by sorak · · Score: 1

      it has not crashed more than 1 or 2 times in 2237 days of cumulative uptime

      Apparently, you have pre-existing stability problems with this box. The fact that it crashed yet again yesterday should come as no great surprise.

      Well, he said continuous uptime. I guess that means that when it crashed, he didn't bother to reboot it. He's been staring at a kernel panic message for six years.

  30. Linux 2.6.21 hangs on leap seconds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You didn't specify your kernel version, but if it was 2.6.21, you may have hit this:

    http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux2.6.gita=commitdiffh=746976a301ac9c9aa10d7d42454f8d6cdad8ff2b

    Thankfully this was a short-lived bug which only affected 2.6.21.

    1. Re:Linux 2.6.21 hangs on leap seconds by Eil · · Score: 1

      I'm looking at the link you posted and just looks like a subsection of the kernel tree. Do you have a link to the actual bug description or changelog? Because I don't see anything in the link you posted to validate your assertion.

      Mods: Check links before blindly modding posts up, please.

    2. Re:Linux 2.6.21 hangs on leap seconds by arodland · · Score: 1

      Here's a working link to the diff that fixed the bug, with description.

    3. Re:Linux 2.6.21 hangs on leap seconds by fnj · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link to the actual bug description or changelog? Because I don't see anything in the link you posted to validate your assertion.

      Apparently he does not. However, if you google "2.6.21 leap second" you get to page 2 of a thread which starts here: http://www.linux-archive.org/debian-user/220788-hard-crash-leap-second.html. Apparently it may occur on "any" kernel before 2.6.21.6 (fairly obviously not "any" since 0.1, but you get the idea). Sounds to me that it would only show on an SMP system, but I didn't spend much time studying it.

      AFAIK, f8 shipped with 2.6.23.1, so since several have reported f8 crashes on leap second in this article's comments, maybe this bug didn't get fixed so well. I did have a fully updated SMP f8 system (2.6.26.6) run through the recent leap second occurrence without crashing.

    4. Re:Linux 2.6.21 hangs on leap seconds by aputerguy · · Score: 1

      I am running: 2.6.26.6-49.fc8

    5. Re:Linux 2.6.21 hangs on leap seconds by JM+Apocalypse · · Score: 1
      --

      - - - - - - -
      Orppf urp mf y.ppcxn. yflcbi otcnnov C am yflcbi yr n.apb Ekrpatv (Dvorak -> Qwerty)
    6. Re:Linux 2.6.21 hangs on leap seconds by GXTi · · Score: 1

      Fixed link: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=746976a301ac9c9aa10d7d42454f8d6cdad8ff2b

      If that link doesn't work, blame Slashdot because I sure as hell previewed it.

  31. Another anecdote by CustomDesigned · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I switched from Windows 95 to RedHat 6.2 many years ago, and except for reboots to upgrade the hardware (started with 200Mhz Pentium I w/ 384M and now have Dual Core w/ 2G) or OS (now on CentOS 5.2), it has crashed only twice - due to a defective USB2.0 card which I replaced.

    We run LTSP so that the single server runs the entire family, using old '90s hardware for thin clients. We simply could not afford to run Windows (or Mac).

  32. Re:nope by ArcticFlood · · Score: 3, Informative

    Fedora 8's end of life doesn't occur until January 7th, so it would still get timezone updates.

    --
    This is here so you don't ignore the last two lines of my posts.
  33. Fedora 8 locked up here by AZPolarBear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My Fedora 8 system locked up after the leap second update was logged at 00:00 UT. I was my DHCP server, so the network went down.

    1. Re:Fedora 8 locked up here by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was my DHCP server, so the network went down.

      I was my DHCP server too (I entered my DHCP responses on a hex keypad) but then I got dnsmasq, and now the computer hands out addresses for me.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Fedora 8 locked up here by kmike · · Score: 1

      A notebook with Fedora 8 (2.6.26.6-49_1.cubbi_tuxonice.fc8) has survived the New Year leap.

      Here's a followup to this Slashdot story:
      http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/2009/01/01/post-leap-seconds/

    3. Re:Fedora 8 locked up here by Gyver_lb · · Score: 1

      A Gentoo box locked up at 0:00 GMT too (last logs were around 23:59:xx and the system responded only to a hard reset).

      I have 4 other Gentoos that stayed up without any complaint. So this might involve a driver or at least a particular system state.

  34. Anyone With New Year's Toast Accidents by david_craig · · Score: 4, Funny

    My toast got burnt sometime between 9:59:40 EST (Eastern Standard Time in New South Wales, GMT +10:00) and 10:00:00 EST (GMT +10:00) on Jan 1, 2008 which remarkably corresponds to within at most 20 seconds of the New Year in GMT. I have been making toast with this same wetware non-stop for more than twenty six years and other than the occasional lapse in concentration while speaking on the phone, I have not burnt toast more than 1 or 2 times in 2237 days of cumulative toasting. Nothing other than background processes were running through my mind at the time of the burning. Could this be a coincidence or was there some 2008/2009 rollover issue going on here? Has anyone (other than Zune 30GB owners) noticed similar year-end issues while operating toasters or electronic devices?

    1. Re:Anyone With New Year's Toast Accidents by JustOK · · Score: 1

      frakkin toasters

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Anyone With New Year's Toast Accidents by laejoh · · Score: 1

      ... 2237 days of cumulative toasting.

      Listening to your story made me think the 2237 days of cumulative toasting felt like 1337.

    3. Re:Anyone With New Year's Toast Accidents by Undead+NDR · · Score: 1

      My toast got burnt sometime between 9:59:40 EST (Eastern Standard Time in New South Wales, GMT +10:00) and 10:00:00 EST (GMT +10:00) on Jan 1, 2008 which remarkably corresponds to within at most 20 seconds of the New Year in GMT.

      You mean the bug also affects OpenBSD?

  35. Not here, just a coincidence by macemoneta · · Score: 2

    My Fedora 8 and Fedora 10 machines did not experience any problems. Maybe you had a power glitch, if there's nothing in the logs.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  36. Just because its old by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    I am running Redhat 7.2 on one of my servers w/o a problem. On one of my desktops, I am running IBM OS/2 (Ecs 2.0RC5) and there was no problem overnight.

    Just because something is old does not mean it won't work. I have old pencils that have not crashed. My PC Lint 7.0 t-shirt from 1992 still works without a crash.

  37. Re:In other news... by Firehed · · Score: 1

    Maybe I've missed something, but pointing out that some Linux-based servers crashed at midnight on New Years hardly seems like an advertisement to run Linux to me.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  38. Re:boxen! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 5, Funny

    On Debian, RHEL, Centos & Boxen! On Irix, Solaris, Ibex & Vixen!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  39. Leap Year by waynegoode · · Score: 1

    The only special thing about 2008 I know of is that it is a leap year. That was the cause of the Zune problem. Could be the cause of other problems also.

    Speaking of coincidences, many people said of the Z2K9 problem that it was a merely a coincidence that it happened on New Years and on a leap year--but they were wrong. One of an item (Zune, server, etc.) crashing at New Years is probably coincidence. Several probably is systemic.

  40. Nothing crashed on me -- madplayer hicked however by billsf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Madplayer hicked three times at about 0100 CET. I thought it might have been my RAID system I had just repaired. (There was a bad sas/sata controller.) This happened over about 20 seconds. I only use Unix/Unix-like systems and to the best of my knowledge there are no embedded MS devices in this house.

    Unix/Linux, etc. handles things like this well. All time sync services like NTP, DCF-77, MSF, WWVB, GPS and the rest give fair warning. I personally are in favour of ditching 'leap seconds'. Time corrections would best be made day to day, the length of today being based on yesterday. That's better, but surely someone can think up the real solution?

    BillSF

    PS: Frequent updates to Java caused by US daylight saving time are pathetic.

         

  41. Our UK production DNS systems crashed by zerosumgame · · Score: 1

    Definitely saw some funky behaviour last night...wonderful way to start the new year... Both of our UK-based DNS servers crashed about 2-3 seconds prior to midnight GMT time. Both of these systems are running Linux kernel 2.6.21 on older Dell 1850's. Our other DNS servers (US and Australia) all run 2.6.21 on newer Dell equipment (1950/2950), but none of them crashed. Both UK systems had to be power cycled, but afterwards they came up OK.

    1. Re:Our UK production DNS systems crashed by Wibla · · Score: 1

      Both my fileservers running debian etch installed from custom install media (pre-etchnhalf) running 2.6.21-2 and 2.6.21-6 crashed, but came up fine after a hard reset when I got home from the party, 300km away... was abit nervous until I noticed others had problems too.

    2. Re:Our UK production DNS systems crashed by zerosumgame · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After some google searching, at least some of these issues may be attributable to a bug in the Linux code that handles the leap second. http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/3/103 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=746976a301ac9c9aa10d7d42454f8d6cdad8ff2b

    3. Re:Our UK production DNS systems crashed by fnord_uk · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that Zunes run Linux?

      fnord

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.
    4. Re:Our UK production DNS systems crashed by fnord_uk · · Score: 1

      My Nokia N800, running 2.6.21 was running with a high load for no obvious reason this morning (well, yesterday actally), and kept draining its battery. I uninstalled some recent package updates but the problem remained. After a few reboots it seems to be back to normal.

      fnord

      --
      In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.
  42. If The NES has taught us anything. by senorpoco · · Score: 1

    Take out the hard drive, blow on it and then reinsert it.

  43. Ubuntu 8.04 on AMD64 crashed overnight: BlackSOD by Maow · · Score: 1

    It didn't crash at the rollover time, GMT or PST, but sometime between 3am and 11am new year's day.

    When I turned on the monitor this morning, a black screen with cursor flashing at top left position.

    First time I've ever seen this crash, a B[lack]ScreenOfDeath on Linux.

    You're certainly not entirely alone. I expect more reports to appear.

  44. why? by arctan1701 · · Score: 1

    why is this front page?

  45. Well, I didn't get called by sabernet · · Score: 1

    Didn't yet get a call from a panic stricken rep wondering why they can't access their webapp. So I'm assuming that either the voip system is also dead or everything's going grea [...Connection Reset by Peer]

    1. Re:Well, I didn't get called by GlobalColding · · Score: 1

      I bet the website is down http://www.thewebsiteisdown.com/ heh heh!

  46. My Debian box by Goodgerster · · Score: 1

    The X window system on my Debian box crashed at 23:59:59 UTC --- when I returned from watching the fireworks on TV, the clock was stuck at this time. As usual it wouldn't kill, so I have just finished repairing my Firefox profile due to the ensuing hard reset.

  47. Apparent leap-second bugs by Burdell · · Score: 1

    I had one RHEL 4 server (out of a half dozen identically configured systems) crash at exactly the moment the leap second should have been inserted. The logs run up to 18:59:59 CST (UTC-06:00) and the system froze, when all my other Linux systems logged they were inserting a leap second. I have read reports of some Debian systems having a similar problem. The leap second code is probably one of the least tested areas of the Linux kernel (there have only been 8 leap seconds since Linux was started); there is probably some race condition related to stepping the clock that only some systems hit.

    I have also read reports of problems with Oracle RAC (not stand-alone Oracle) crashing at the leap second.

  48. Linux Kernel 2.6.28 by Oryn · · Score: 1

    Yes,
    The latest Linux kernel 2.6.28 has a bug with regards to laptop screen brightness its sort of inverted.
    This did not happen with 2.6.27.10

  49. OpenBSD: up 495 days on 1/1/09 by enterix · · Score: 1

    1:30AM up 495 days

    no comments

  50. same thing here by Pretzalzz · · Score: 1

    My box crashed also. I've never had a kernel crash before. I asked at http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/01/msg00006.html . One other person reported a similar problem. Someone mentioned it is a known problem with pre 2.6.21.6 kernels though I was running a more recent version.

  51. Minor Win2k glitches by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 1

    Two Win2k boxes on my SOHO network came up with network access down/disabled. I was afraid my router had gone TU but this here Ubuntu box got online without problems. Reboots worked to get the Win2k machines online again.

    FWIW

    --

    I bought this house and you know I'm boss
    Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

  52. Solaris systems by tearmeapart · · Score: 1

    Apparently many Solaris systems restarted. People at NANOG are reporting this. A few banks' systems were rebooted as well: TD, Scotia, American Savings Bank, US Bank, and many more...
    I saw many operating systems rebooting, even though this did not happen the last time in 2005.
    Good thing I use ZFS on FreeBSD, and after I changed the loader.conf, I have a system that has stayed up for more than 2 months now, including last night.

  53. Roku by desinc · · Score: 1

    My Roku rebooted on its own while I was watching a movie (Primer) @ ~1:30AM PST 1/1/09...

  54. Windows CE crash by Radio_active_cgb · · Score: 1

    We had a report that one of our WinCE-based prototypes crashed and would not restart Wed (Dec 30).

    Initially, we thought that it may have been due to an impatient user removing power during a normal shutdown, and may have occurred during a write to the flash memory drive. We can't tell exactly what happened from here (U.S.) as the prototype is in Europe.

    And then again, it may just be co-incidental....

  55. Yeah my Commodore Amiga 4000 crapped out :( by GlobalColding · · Score: 1

    Dropped a Guru Meditation #00000025.65045338 while I was playing Giana Sisters... Is that a sign of the Apocalypse too?

  56. Fedora 8 bug? by Morgor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interestingly enough I saw exactly the same. Two of our production servers running fedora 8 crashed exactly at 01:01:02 GMT+1. I am beginning to suspect that this must be a Fedora 8/NTP-related bug...

  57. Yes. by akorvemaker · · Score: 1

    My car battery died this morning. Who'd have thought that thing had a clock in it?!

  58. Internet connection death by bored · · Score: 1

    My internet connection died exactly one minute before new years and stayed that way for 8 hours.....

    Later, while diagnosing the situation, I discovered it was probably my big feet kicking the switch in the closet with the party favors when I went to get the toy horns, the uplink port to the firewall was partially pulled out.

  59. Leap second by cyngus · · Score: 1

    At midnight GMT (well, UTC actually), we added a leap second. This seems to correspond with the time you're talking about. The most shocking thing is that this was not the first response to this story.

  60. Re:test -- NTP + Leap Second ? by tmontes · · Score: 1

    Could this be a coincidence or was there some 2008/2009 rollover issue going on here?

    set the system time back a few mins before the crash occured and see if your server crashes again... otherwise it's idle speculation

    It might be difficult to reproduce if the system clock is NTP synched. Especially considering we had a leap second this year, where the clocks rolled from 23:59:59 to 23:59:60 to 00:00:00 GMT.
    As someone else said: check your logs + try to reproduce.
    --
    Happy new Year

  61. Likely by Demena · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It was the leap second

  62. nope by i621148 · · Score: 1

    uptime 15:45:56 up 9 days uname -a Linux 2.6.21-7.fc7xen

  63. Re:Leap second by banffbug · · Score: 1

    I just assumed everyone knew it was the leap second causing a problem when the author said "some 2008/2009 rollover issue going on here?"

  64. odd. My fedora 9 server crashed around the same by Lightjumper · · Score: 1

    My Fedora 9 server crashed around the same times yesterday . I found the keyboard lights flashing. I booted it at 19:51 EST. Last postfix message was at 17:59:57 Dec 31 17:59:57 bbs postfix/smtpd[1689]: messages : Dec 31 17:59:02 bbs snmpd[1871]: Received SNMP packet(s) from UDP: Dec 31 19:51:29 bbs kernel: imklog 3.20.2, log source = /proc/kmsg started. Not 18:59, But kinda of seems odd..

  65. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by ThePhilips · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Try once yourself to code conversion from "seconds since 1/1/1970 00:00:00" to any other user digestible presentation.

    It's not as easy as it might seem.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  66. My brain crashed by cyberspittle · · Score: 1

    I think it was the alcohol, but I'm not sure. I recovered some 8 hours later. why is the sun on the west and not the east?

  67. Re:Ubuntu 8.04 on AMD64 crashed overnight: BlackSO by corychristison · · Score: 1

    Sounds like X crashed and you fell into vt7... where X normally is.

    All you needed to do was press Ctrl+Alt+F1 (to switch to vt1), log in as root, and restart X.

    Not sure how to do it on Ubuntu but on Gentoo it's "/etc/init.d/xdm restart".

  68. Re:test -- NTP + Leap Second ? by antdude · · Score: 1

    Can a dummy NTP server be set up to reproduce this?

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  69. Ubuntu 8.10 froze around midnight UTC by kst · · Score: 1

    My Ubuntu 8.10 system froze around midnight GMT. There's nothing in the logs to indicate any problem, except that the last log entry is at Dec 31 15:55:02 (that's 5 minutes before midnight) for a cron job that runs every 5 minutes. I wasn't at home at the time, so I didn't see what happened, except that my ssh connection died.

    When I got home a few hours later, the system was still powered on (the fan was running), but the screen was blank. I was able to reboot it with no problem.

    It's not the same problem as on the Zune, since that hit 24 hours earlier. It *might* have something to do with the leap second, or maybe it's a problem that occurs at the end of the 366th day of the year.

    I suppose I could set the clock back and run it through midnight again. I'm not sure I'll bother, but if somebody else wants to try it it would be interesting to see the results. Or maybe I'll try that with a live CD.

  70. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by abaddononion · · Score: 1

    Unless things have changed, Im pretty certain Microsoft doesnt use posix or "unix" time...

    Windows NT time is specified as the number of 100 nanosecond intervals since January 1, 1601. UNIX time is specified as the number of seconds since January 1, 1970. There are 134,774 days (or 11,644,473,600 seconds) between these dates.

    Maybe things have changed since NT... but Id have my doubts.

    Not that that changes your point. It doesnt. Just sayin.

  71. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    I was simply giving an example. Nothing more. NT time vs. Unix time makes not much difference.

    Time conversions e.g. hardware clock to OS time (where Zune30 borked) are by no mean trivial functions anymore as they were in past: DST, leap years, non-leap years and now leap seconds. Probability of coding error are pretty high and even testing not always helps since people also tends to make mistakes on date calculations.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  72. Yes:10 Fedora Core 7 boxes of mine died at 7am UTC by blit · · Score: 1

    I'm a sysadmin for a small data centre.

    This morning, at about 7am UTC 10 machines running Fedora Core 7 all locked up. They were on a private network inaccessible to the general internet. The lockups were all complete: not even Caps Lock on a connected keyboard worked (a good sign of kernel death). Rebooting and checking the logs gave no information: the last syslog entry was sometime after midnight and was normal. Once restarted (with a hard reset) they all seem to be functioning normally. I don't know yet what caused the lockup.

    It's as if a million Fedora boxes cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced...

  73. Re:Yes:10 Fedora Core 7 boxes of mine died at 7am by blit · · Score: 1

    Indeed, it's the known bug in 2.6.21 as mentioned on the debian lists: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2009/01/msg00006.html

    So now I know, thanks slashdot!

  74. My front door lock froze by Pogue+Mahone · · Score: 1

    My front door lock froze at midnight CET. Couldn't get back in after letting off fireworks. Fortunately there's a back door, but if that hadn't worked we could have tried the windows :-)

    --
    Every bloody emperor has his hand up history's skirt [Peter Hammill/VdGG]
  75. Yes, I crashed. The red eyes of death. by Wonderkid · · Score: 1

    Happy New Year! :-)

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

  76. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

    Converting a *nix timestamp to a date is the kind of thing that should be part of a high-school level programming class.

    The code may be a little longer than people expect, but it is easy.

    The only difficulty at all is added by programmers that want to optimize it to be shorter and 'cooler' (i.e. incomprehensible to anyone maintaining the code because you found a way to make it shorter by having it call itself recursively).

    These are reusable functions, and are simple enough that you can check them by hand for test dates thousands of years in the future. There's absolutely no excuse to be using new and buggy implementations in every product.

  77. G1 messages from the future... by kraftey · · Score: 1

    I believe all the G1's (google phone) show all messages received between Dec 29 and Dec 31 as being from the year 2009.

    1. Re:G1 messages from the future... by tif · · Score: 1

      I noticed that as well. It was reported as Issue 1695

  78. Re:Nothing crashed on me -- madplayer hicked howev by binford2k · · Score: 1

    I personally are in favour of ditching 'leap seconds'.

    How many of you are there?

  79. Re:boxen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Trying for some flip geek cool (if such a thing could ever actually exist) merely shows ignorance

    Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer says hi. You might not be able to hear him, though I don't know whether to blame the fact that the joke went miles over your head, or that you're wearing your asscheeks as earmuffs.

  80. 2008 included in Y2K failures by Eric+Elliott · · Score: 1

    Raytheon ASD (Y2K project in 98 & 99) did find failure modes past 2012 due to software and firmwares. Near as I can remember some were in 2008. Industrial and commercial equipment is often be used > 30 years but little was tested for date related failures until 1997. Call it random failure unless you complete post mortem exam!

  81. Re:boxen! by bkgood · · Score: 1

    This is probably why there will never be a year of the linux desktop.

    Nonsense, 2009 is the year of the linux desktop!

  82. Flash by joaommp · · Score: 1

    Flash player running on my 64bit Firefox crashed.

    1. Re:Flash by Shados · · Score: 1

      It would be a more exceptional event if it -didn't-

  83. so, ... by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    So if we don't see a bunch of "Mine crashed too!" comments we should get worried?

    Some kind of new bug in the kernel? ;-/

  84. Re:boxen! by lordtoran · · Score: 1

    I'm quite sure "boxen" is a germanism - and in that case it would be the correct plural form.

    --
    Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
  85. Typical human response by geofgibson · · Score: 1

    This is the same type of human response which says, "We've observed slightly higher levels of CO2 lately, we've observed slightly higher temperatures lately, humans burn things which create CO2 ... Humans must be destroying the planet!!" The failure of schools to teach critical thinking is what will destroy the planet.

  86. Our local cell tower went wonky by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    Our local cell tower went wonky in the early evening, around when Europe would be crossing over into 2009. Since companies like Ericsson and NSN make the vast majority of basestation equipment, I wonder if their internal time base is set to either GMT, or GMT+1 or GMT+2 to match their home country. If so, it could have been a New Year's glitch.

    What do I mean by "went wonky?" Around 5:00 Central and for awhile after that, we couldn't send or receive phone calls regardless of having full-strength reception. If a call connected, it acted as if it had no reception or next to no reception. Calls dropped with a "connection error."

    If you're curious, this was on AT&T, and was not a 3G connection.

  87. Re:Something to do with Y2K38 by jibjibjib · · Score: 1

    The UNIX time rollover happens on 2038-01-19. So, I don't see how it would have anything to do with a problem that occurred at the end of a year.

  88. Re:Catastrophe by HJED · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps it is the leap second that is coursing problems for computers using NTP and other time servers

    --
    null
  89. Quote from SANS Internet Storm center by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5602

    "A leap second will be added to the clock at 12/31/2008 23:59:59 UTC tonight.
    Hopefully most IT folks will be otherwise occupied at that time and not focusing on their system clocks."

    1. Re:Quote from SANS Internet Storm center by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Hopefully most IT folks will be otherwise occupied at that time and not focusing on their system clocks

      Occupied doing what?

    2. Re:Quote from SANS Internet Storm center by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Hopefully most IT folks will be otherwise occupied at that time and not focusing on their system clocks

      Occupied doing what?

      Furiously masturbating to disgusting hentai?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  90. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by therufus · · Score: 1

    1601??? WTF???? Does Microsoft just love large unnecessary numbers? Or is this so people can wind back the clock in their accounting software to backdate an invoice that needed to be created 400 years ago?

    OMG!

    --
    You moved your mouse. Please restart Windows for changes to take effect.
  91. It's Y209... Call the COBOL guys by VennData · · Score: 1

    Subprime Technologies

  92. WinXP Activation by interestingspecimen · · Score: 1

    My old (and mostly unused) Windows XP machine, for which I bought a copy of XP a few years ago, today suddenly required re-activation. The key that came with the XP copy doesn't work anymore. But probably it has nothing to do with a year-2009-like bug.

  93. it's possible... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Is your cat running windows?

    1. Re:it's possible... by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Most cats core dump rather than BSoD, so I don't think Windows is standard on the platform...

  94. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 4, Informative

    ANSI dates are counted from 1601-01-01 and were adopted by the American National Standards Institute for use with COBOL and other computer languages. This epoch is the beginning of the last 400-year cycle by which leap-years are calculated in the Gregorian calendar. The last year of this cycle is the only one divisible by 100 that is a leap-year, which was the year 2000, and which was followed by a new 400-year cycle beginning with 2001. 32-bit versions of the Microsoft Windows operating system count units of one hundred nanoseconds from this epoch

    Wikipedia

    --
    +0 Meh
  95. Display of my digital calendar by this+great+guy · · Score: 1

    The E segment of the last digit of the year failed at exactly midnight !!

    1. Re:Display of my digital calendar by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If it had been the G-segment, I'd have suggested manual digital stimulation to see if it was a hardware or a software failure.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  96. I had one go down. by arodland · · Score: 1

    Specifically I had one Debian machine crash, and 30 Debian machines, 5 Redhat machines, and various Linux workstations not crash. The machine that crashed has a lousy motherboard, and I see that Linux attempts to reset the CMOS clock following a leap second, so I wonder whether that was what took it out.

    1. Re:I had one go down. by arodland · · Score: 1

      Okay, turns out the affected system was running 2.6.21 and the rest weren't. No mystery there. Glad it was only one oddball machine.

  97. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by blincoln · · Score: 1

    It's related to an ANSI standard, according to MS documentation.

    According to the font of dubious knowledge, 1601 is (in the Gregorian calendar) a common year starting on a Monday. It's also the most recent first year of a century prior to 2001 that meets that criteria.

    I suspect someone picked that date for that reason, and/or because it was back far enough in time to allow the date/time of most most historical data and business records to be represented.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  98. Phone crash by ninjakoala · · Score: 1

    My old Sony-Ericsson T630 has been rebooting itself a couple of times a day over the last months (apparently known as the white screen of death). When I came home after celebrating the new year it was crashed in a rather spectacular way, though: The lights inside the keys were on, the screen was black and it responded to nothing at all. I had to remove the battery to get it going again. Since then it has only had its regular random reboots.

    --
    Against the grain
  99. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by narcberry · · Score: 1

    I believe it is actually 0.1 microsecond intervals.

    But in all seriousness, I'm really annoyed with the ambiguity of "since January 1, 1601" as that would mean that Jan 2, 1601 00:01 and Jan 1, 1601 00:01 could be interpreted as the same time.

    Just one of those little things that's going to cause another NASA disaster... /rant

    --
    Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
  100. Re:Nothing crashed on me -- madplayer hicked howev by billsf · · Score: 1

    How many of me? Just me, I'm the real BillSF..... If you mean how many are against the 'leap second' a quick search turned up this general article: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20026875.400-calls-to-scrap-the-leap-second-grow.html and there is quite a bit more. In fact the first comment to the New Scientist article almost sounds like me. (Its a coincidence, I'd not seen it before.)

  101. Please specify more. by drolli · · Score: 1

    If your post is for real and not a joke, you may spefic a few things, but just some comments to point in the right direction in general:

    1) Holidays are Script-Kiddie time
    2) Script kiddies have the potential to fill your logs
    3) A /var/ which runs full may have the chance to do you server harm (you did not specify if i panicked or just was very unresponsive)
    4) You may have a cron job gone wild
    5) Certificates ran out -> VPNs etc?
    6) you tried to change sth like logrotate and screwed (this could have a 2 year delay) heavily
    7) Something else failed (Power?)
    8) Something esoteric happened (e.g. do you have a watchdog which has a bad driver?)

    If you are using an standard out-of-the-box linux with out-of-the-box software, i would think you are alone.

  102. iPod Nano crash by Creosote · · Score: 1

    I have a first-generation iPod Nano. Yesterday (the 31st) after I had downloaded an audiobook to it, it crashed totally. Was around 1500 my time, 2000 GMT. iTunes restore wouldn't fix it until I had reformatted the drive. Never happened before.

    Probably just coincidence--but kind of spooky. FWIW I have time/date set to display in the menu bar, which is not the default.

  103. No crashes here.. by drsmall17 · · Score: 1

    1 system running ArchLinux and 3 machines running Ubuntu 7.04 survived the leap second :)

    20:41:38 up 61 days, 5:26, 0 users, load average: 0.07, 0.08, 0.09
    20:41:47 up 56 days, 17 min, 0 users, load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.00
    20:42:04 up 21 days, 11:31, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.37, 0.49
    20:42:17 up 4 days, 6:08, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.06, 0.02

    --
    Oday ouyay antway otay ayplay away amegay?
  104. Re:Nothing crashed on me -- madplayer hicked howev by binford2k · · Score: 1

    actually, I was just making a dumb pedantic joke about the fact that you used a singular subject with the plural form of "to be."

  105. 20 linux servers stayed up here by LurkingOnSlashdot · · Score: 1

    I administrate about 20 linux servers (debian and RHEL) and nothing happened. All are running fine. It's just you.

  106. Power anyone? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Could a crash be related to the power system? There could be fluctuations caused by spikes in usage, or perhaps suppliers switching sources as contracts end on the calendar year etc..
    On the other hand, none of my servers suffered any ill effects... But my macbook pro was acting very strange this morning, programs were spuriously crashing (both safari and firefox, randomly crashing while browsing different sites including slashdot), turned it off for a few minutes, booted it back and everything is back to normal.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  107. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    I find it very amusing that Microsoft follow the ANSI standard, yet they cannot handle daylight savings time in any useful fashion. Unlike Unix, which has tzdata to note the different changes in DST between regions, Microsoft only stores the start of DST and the end of DST for the current year. So when governments change DST for one year they need to issue a patch to change DST, but then they need to issue a new patch after the DST ends to switch it back to normal.

    This, of course, plays havoc for Exchange calendaring and any software that relies on accurate times to schedule in meetings, etc. So nice going Microsoft, you STILL can't get it right even though you have brought out Windows Server 2008 and you are soon to release Windows 7. Just how hard could it be to FIX this?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  108. leap second? by lanky2004 · · Score: 1

    could it have been something to do with the leap second that was added in at 2008-12-31 23:59:60

  109. fuzzy logic by rubah · · Score: 1

    I don't think web servers have progressed to possessing the kind of fuzzy logic where they can go 'OMG it's almost the end of a leapyear! I better freak out'

    Seeing relations like that is more geared to humans, who sometimes teach computers to look for specific examples of such coincidence, but generally I believe they couldn't come up with it themselves, at least not on the webserver level.

  110. g1 thinks messages in 2008 were sent in 2009 by PoopyMerl · · Score: 1

    My g1 thinks that all SMS messages sent yesterday (12/32/08) were sent on 12-31-2009

  111. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Funny

    Try once yourself to code conversion from "seconds since 1/1/1970 00:00:00" to any other user digestible presentation.

    It's not as easy as it might seem.

    Done:
    $ perl -MHTTP::Date -e 'print time2str(1230796800)';
    Thu, 01 Jan 2009 08:00:00 GMT

  112. Data Point by Thyrsus · · Score: 1

    bash-3.2$ cat /etc/redhat-release
    Fedora release 8 (Werewolf)
    bash-3.2$ date
    Thu Jan 1 22:32:01 EST 2009
    bash-3.2$ uptime
      22:32:03 up 27 days, 8:33, 6 users, load average: 2.01, 1.94, 1.87

    I do a "sudo yum update" approximately weekly.

  113. ehow died too by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    This one surprised me. The entire ehow earnings system for its writers crashed and they still haven't fixed it. Apparently it wasn't rollover friendly. I don't remember but they've only started the system about 16-10 months ago so it's possible it has never seen a year rollover yet. Still, they're like the 39th most visited website in the US believe it or not so it's kinda odd that their entire writer's earnings system would fail.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  114. NTP and the leap second by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A surprising number of NTP servers didn't add the leap second correctly. On the mailing list for pool.ntp.org contributors, it was reported that at just after midnight UTC that about 158 servers in the pool (about about 2000) were reporting times that were around 1000ms off. A few hours later it was only 13 that were doing that.

    My own (stratum 3) NTP server got confused and declared that it couldn't determine the correct time. Some of its sources were 1000ms off from others. Given enough time, NTP will sort itself out, but I intervened manually by ditching the upstream servers that hadn't gotten it right.

    If enough NTP servers were temporarily in the state that mine was in (was so unsure of itself that it wouldn't serve time to clients) then I could imagine some process that tries to sync the time and fails because ntpdate doesn't return anything useful.

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    1. Re:NTP and the leap second by MooUK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Failing to update surely shouldn't be a matter of crashing, however. Network services do go down; it's something you plan to cope with.

    2. Re:NTP and the leap second by Myopic · · Score: 2

      Yes, you're totally right of course; but the operative word is "should". No computer "should" ever crash, but they do precisely because the programmer didn't "plan to cope with" something. As a programmer, I take full personal blame.

  115. Re:Could easily be just a coincidence by aputerguy · · Score: 1

    Except that based on the responders that there were hundreds of such crashes at exactly that time (GMT) -- including people who had 10 or more servers crash at exactly that moment.

  116. Ubuntu 8.10 by Qwell · · Score: 1

    My Ubuntu 8.10 box hung last night. I had a friend check IM logs... He's on Atlantic (GMT-400) time. Weird. (08:05:33 PM) qwell: that was random (08:05:41 PM) qwell: box just...froze (08:05:47 PM) qwell: wasn't even doing anything O.o

    --
    As of 10/06/03, I hate COBOL developers.
    1. Re:Ubuntu 8.10 by Qwell · · Score: 1

      apparently I fail at formatting. oh well.

      --
      As of 10/06/03, I hate COBOL developers.
  117. My Fedora 8 box is still running by Michael+Meissner · · Score: 1

    My fedora 8 box has been running for 17 days (it had been running for a couple of months before we lost power for a week). So it isn't Fedora 8 per se. FWIW, my Fedora 10 box has been running for the same time (I need to think about upgrading the Fedora 8 box sometime).

  118. Amazing by nukeade · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought there was no way that Y2K9 would affect me, then the girlfriend asked me to check on a flight for her--and I found that United Airlines' website returns 2008 flight data if you search for flight information for Jan. 1 or Jan. 2 2009! How amateur is that?

    ~Ben

    1. Re:Amazing by BlueLightning · · Score: 1

      They weren't the only ones. nationalrail.co.uk refused to deal with January 1 yesterday, complaining that it was in the past.

  119. Re:Leap second by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    On the 30th... the news anchors at WBZ-TV Boston joked about getting an extra second of sleep from the leap second. Actually, since Midnight GMT is at the start of their broadcast, they got an extra second on-the-air.

  120. Re:Did you mean by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

    Nyet!

    --
    sudo eat my shorts
  121. Re:boxen! by antek9 · · Score: 1

    Yeah right, only that 'Box' is not a German word. Try 'Kisten' instead (plural of 'Kiste'=box). This doesn't mean that Box/Boxen is not used in colloquial German in the exact way the parent post talks about, because it is.

    'Boxen' on the other hand is German for what you would call 'boxing' (the sports).

    --
    A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
    Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
  122. My system crashed too by Jim+Fenton · · Score: 1

    My Fedora 8 machine (kernel: 2.6.26.6-49.fc8) crashed around midnight UTC as well. Last syslog message was at 23:40:07 UTC so it may have not happened at exactly midnight; it would be unusual not to have something logged for 20 minutes. When I got to the machine, it was completely unresponsive; couldn't get it to do anything but reboot. The hardware has been very reliable and it's on a UPS.

    I have seen a thread on linux.debian.user about this happening on Debian.

    Before someone points it out, yes, I know that support for Fedora 8 goes away in a week or so.

  123. Recipe for a new Slashdot meme by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

    "My [thing] crashed sometime between [t] and [t+1] on Dec 31, 2008 which remarkably corresponds to within at most 20 seconds of the New Year in GMT. I have been running this same [thing] non-stop for more than [long_time] and other than the occasional [maintenance_operation], it has not crashed more than 1 or 2 times in [toDays(long_time)] of cumulative uptime. Nothing other than [default_operations] were running at the time of the crash. Could this be a coincidence or was there some 2008/2009 rollover issue going on here? Has anyone (other than Zune 30GB owners) noticed similar year-end issues with their [things]?"

  124. Why restrict it? by nsayer · · Score: 1

    Why bother saying, "Besides Zune owners?"

    How many of those could there be?

    I mean, willing to publicly admit it?

  125. Gmail crashed for me on January 1... by psiphiorg · · Score: 1

    It may just be a coincidence, but my Gmail account became "disabled" on January 1. When I tried to log in the evening of the 1st, it came back with the message "Sorry, your account has been disabled. [?]". The question mark was a link to instructions on how to re-enable it, but those instructions are apparently out of date. They say that if your account is disabled, you can enter your username and password, and you'll be presented with a CAPTCHA; if you enter that, you'll be allowed to log in. However, I was never presented with a CAPTCHA, so I can't complete the steps.

    Has this Gmail outage affected anybody else? Is this a repeat of the December 6th outage, or is it just me?

    davidh

  126. 2 of 5 Linux servers crashed. by rknize · · Score: 1

    I had a total of 5 Linux machines running here at home and 2 of them locked hard sometime near midnight UTC.

    One is my main server running Debian Etch and had been up for several months. It had not crashed once since replacing the hardware over a year ago. We were watching a recording on MythTV when it locked-up. I walked over to my workstation, running Ubuntu Intrepid, to restart the backend and it was also locked-up hard.

    Very bizarre until I looked at the logs and did the math. Both logs end just before midnight UTC.

    --
    Russ W. Knize
  127. MythTV on Fedora 8, crashed by Rufosx · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure of the time, but it locked up sometime during the night. After a measly 6 months of up time.

  128. Coincidence ? by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

    Oddly, my ISP seems to have experienced some kind of problem starting just after midnight. I monitor my aDSL modem/router activity every 10 minutes, and discovered that between 00:00:02 (the last entry in the log) and 00:10:01 the router reports zero network traffic, and continued like that until some time late yesterday afternoon. I did the usual diagnostics tests to ensure I wasn't to blame, but all seems well on my end. Without me taking any corrective action the problem disappeared, so I'm pretty confident it was in fact my ISP.

    What's odd is that I was able to gain aDSL sync, and establish a PPP session (which involves logging in), but there seemed to be no IP routing going on at all. Pings would simply vanish.

    It's times like this that I wish I had a more sophisticated modem/router so that I could capture the 'out' side of the device and see what's going on.

  129. iPod Nano Crashed by Naznarreb · · Score: 1

    My 2nd gen 2 gig iPod nano froze yesterday. Came back after a soft boot to discover the battery was almost completely dead; was a little less that 50% when I last put it too sleep.

  130. And for what it's worth... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Over two thousand days of consecutive uptime?

    Sounds like someone doesn't patch their kernel. Not a good idea, unless the machine's sole purpose was to set an uptime record.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:And for what it's worth... by Kerkyon · · Score: 1

      Over two thousand days of consecutive uptime?

      s/consecutive/cumulative

    2. Re:And for what it's worth... by Undead+NDR · · Score: 1

      s/consecutive/cumulative

      s|$|/|

  131. Re:And for what it's worth... R->C->P by Harik · · Score: 1

    Over two thousand days of consecutive uptime?

    Sounds like someone doesn't patch their kernel. Not a good idea, unless the machine's sole purpose was to set an uptime record.

    and other than the occasional reboot for kernel (or distro) upgrades

  132. Fedora 8 Linux server crash .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    What did the log files say ..

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  133. No test by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1

    Could this be a coincidence or was there some 2008/2009 rollover issue going on here?

    set the system time back a few mins before the crash occured and see if your server crashes again... otherwise it's idle speculation

    I suspect changing the clock will prove nothing. It is likely that a computer in isolation will happily count onwards, leap-second or no. I would have said all standalone software these days ought to be written well enough to take care of this, but there was the Zune...

    The problem probably comes when you have several computers connected together, and only some of them are putting in the leap second. Initially the computers may check their clocks, as small errors are likely, but thereafter they may be synchronized. Then, all of a sudden, some of them are giving out time stamps that seem to be a whole second ahead of the others. It might be quite reasonable to reject packets of data with impossible timestamps, as their data might be corrupt, or it may be some hacker injecting fake packets, and they haven't got the clocks quite right. So you would have to reset the clocks on lots of computers - perhaps all the computers on the internet - to run a proper test, and even then there might be a freak combination of circumstances that stops it happening a second time.

    Really, the only sensible thing to do is to do what the original poster did - write to Slashdot and find out whether there were other cases. He seems to have got a lot of replies saying "well duh! there are millions of computers so one is bound to crash close to the New Year, don't'cha understand probability?" which is rather unfair as you won't know you are the only one unless you ask. He hasn't got the fifty or so replies saying they saw the same thing that might have meant a systematic problem, so it was probably random.

  134. Re:Nothing crashed on me -- madplayer hicked howev by GWRedDragon · · Score: 1

    Instead of inserting a leap second every 1.6 years, insert a leap minute every 100 years. That way the next time it happens will be 2108 and since none of us will be alive it will be someone else's problem.

  135. Point of information by vorlich · · Score: 1

    naturally such a senior member of the administration is only ever served special cat milk which is very low in lactose.

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
  136. IANAS by mrrudge · · Score: 1

    There are *lots* of people read /. and those people are *likely* to have lots of machines around which all have a possibility of crashing at some stage ?

    So, at *any* random time, posting this story on the front page is likely to correspond to something falling over nearby for more than a few people ?

    Man, you remember 2000, when a load of shit ( didn't really very ) broke, wouldn't it be cool if that had happened again . . .

  137. Pitney Bowes Postage Station by TheReverandND · · Score: 1

    But past that nothing.

  138. I had a crash, Old School. by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

    Strange enough, the hardware (pavement) turned my firmware into software, and it took a long time to recover.

  139. my hp office laptop crashed by slmdmd · · Score: 1

    My office latop was left on by me(it has been on since 6 months) as I never carried it home. Today morning when I came to office the screen saver was frozen. I run xfce and xscreensaver, screen saver freeze is common on my fedora 9. So I tried ssh and ping from another machine but none worked. It was very hot too,(i never found it hot in the past even after a return from 4 days of vacation). I had to hard reboot. From the cron log messages it seems to have died around 7 pm on Dec. 31st.
    Dec 31 16:01:01 linlap CROND[14254]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Dec 31 17:01:01 linlap CROND[16688]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Dec 31 18:01:01 linlap CROND[19115]: (root) CMD (run-parts /etc/cron.hourly)
    Jan 2 08:43:39 linlap crond[2461]: (CRON) STARTUP (1.0)
    Jan 2 08:43:41 linlap anacron[2518]: Anacron 2.3 started on 2009-01-02
    Jan 2 08:43:41 linlap anacron[2518]: Will run job `cron.daily' in 65 min.

  140. Same thing here... by hitomaru · · Score: 1

    Both my desktop and my coworker's desktop had to be rebooted this morning. Both run ubuntu 8.10 and both look like they crashed around midnight GMT

  141. Fedora 5 Stayed Up by Nezer · · Score: 1

    My server running Fedora Core 5 had no issues. Perhaps I should wait a wee bit longer to upgrade. ;-)

  142. My Ipod crashed... by PYRILAMPES · · Score: 1

    After I dropped my Ipod in a vat of acid, kicked it, let my brother in law borrow it, washed it down with an ultrasonic cleaning dip it seemed to work fine, but then I plugged it into a Windows Vista laptop.... :( I had to reset the ipod after that.... Still Re-Imaging the vista box though. only 1500 security patches left to go...

  143. Not random! by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    Whatever leads to a server crash is not a random event. There is a finite, albeit large, number of bugs in the code that can lead to a crash. In fact, a lot of things that we consider random aren't - such as dice tossing - there are just too many variables for we to track, so we just think of them as random.

    But a server crash in any platform, is a different beast. THERE is a definite reason for the crash. One bug among those millions of lines of code caused the crash. It wasn't anything random, not even pseudo-random as a dice toss.

    And notice that his machine was rock stable. And he wasn't running anything extraordinary. There is a definite chance it has something to do with the leap second. You're analising it as if server crashes simply occured out of thin air.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  144. system administrators aware! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I didn't see any problems on any of the company/outbound servers I'm working with out here in Europe.

    Still, assumption is the f*ckup of mother nature; never just assume or your systems could be down a week later.

    Whenever I hear a disk chirping I'm yanking the alarm bell immediately for further attention; same for fans failing or anything else.
    I don't just assume it's going to be allright just because ... it would cost me my neck.

    I've used to have a nasty bug with my linux systems rebooting every random x day(s) about a year and a half ago; it annoyed me for a week till I downgraded the kernel and gone the problem was. It was a conflict between the new kernel, existing modules and bad libraries .. By fixing the kernel I found out the other problems as well. It's running perfect since then... I just don't assume it's going to be allright while the behavior is abnormal ..

    Moral for me - always be cautious when things happen differently than otherwise because that might be the start of (many) other trouble as I had with 2 systems before...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  145. Re:TiVo too? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Hadn't thought about it, but my TiVo was locked up the evening of the 31st, after several years of working just fine. Though I hadn't used the TV for a couple of days so don't know when it happened.

  146. Re:Could easily be just a coincidence by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    That's one crash every 23.5 seconds on average.

    By your reasoning, you would expect 1-2 /. users to experience a random crash within 20 seconds of midnight (midnight +/- 20 seconds). Did you actually read any of the replies [from numerous other people who experienced similar odd crashes] before you posted this?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  147. Fedora did fine. Update your time package, subby by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    When was the last time you updated your packages, subby?
    I've been running my computer since the beginning of the week, and it never crashed.
    yum update time From they way it sounds, yum check-update

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  148. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    why the fuck doesn't Microsoft Exchange use that? /had to pay $4000 for a time zone table in 2007...

    Perhaps you've answered your own question?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  149. Sonofabitch YES Fedora 7 by equivocal · · Score: 1

    That would explain why at 16:30 my Dell running Fedora 7 would not respond to keyboard or network input but the power light was lit. The most recent long entry was at Dec 31 15:59:39 and was from iptables logging NTP traffic. The old Red Hat 9 system was still playing music, unfazed.

  150. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by theinfamousgeek · · Score: 1

    Our Fedora Core 7 server ran seemlessly throughout the new years time change.

  151. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    Meh. My karma is excellent, therefore I post with a score of 2. What can I say? You post as an AC, you post with a score of 0.

    Interesting though. So they finally have sorted it out in Vista and Windows Server 2008. How many years has this taken now? And what about deployments of Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP? Is there a hotfix planned for these operating systems?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  152. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    In what way did he answer his own question?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  153. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    the part where he mentioned that, by not using that function, they got him to pay another $4k to make it work?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  154. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    Where did he say that he paid Microsoft?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  155. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    An appropriately suspicious person would believe that Microsoft got their cut, naturally. :p

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  156. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    $ perl -e 'print localtime()."\n"'

    This one is shorter. (hint/trick: 'localtime' should be called in scalar() context (."\n" implies that) to out user readable date; perldoc -f localtime).

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  157. Re:boxen! by Laogeodritt · · Score: 1

    I'm nearly certain the grandparent meant "germanism" in the sense of "from a Germanic language", as opposed to "from the modern German language".

    Nonetheless, that is false — a quick etymology lookup reveals that it came into Old English from Late Latin buxis, itself from Greek pyxis from pyxos.

    "Ox" [pl. "oxen"], on the other hand, comes from Old English supposedly through Proto-Germanic; similar forms are found throughout Germanic languages, c.f. Old Norse oxi, Old Frisian oxa, Middle Dutch osse, German Ochse, Gothic auhsa.

  158. Re:Time Mathematics and Microsoft by virtual_mps · · Score: 1

    Try once yourself to code conversion from "seconds since 1/1/1970 00:00:00" to any other user digestible presentation.

    It's not as easy as it might seem.

    Done:
    $ perl -MHTTP::Date -e 'print time2str(1230796800)';
    Thu, 01 Jan 2009 08:00:00 GMT

    I see your perl and raise you one coreutils:
    > date -d @1230796800
    Thu Jan 1 03:00:00 EST 2009

  159. January 1st 00:00:00 UTC crash... by Miravlix · · Score: 1

    I had one Gentoo Server with a 2.6.24 kernel I can't explain why it went network dead, after it was rebooted I could check the logs and see the machine had continued to work, it just didn't talk with anyone.