Slashdot Mirror


IT Workers To Get Fewer Perks, No Free Coffee

dasButcher writes "While the economy is showing signs of recovery and tech stocks posted double- and triple-digit gains in 2009, IT workers are facing a less hospitable workplace in the coming year. Many employers say they're going to continue trimming budgets, particularly in human resources. Rather than giving up head count, they're planning to trim 401k contributions, eliminate bonuses, curtail travel and, dare we say, shut off the free coffee (it wasn't that good anyway)."

620 comments

  1. the school district model by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

    institution purchases even MORE gear because buying is from last years budget.

    institution reduces IT staff because salaries are from this years budget.

    no coffee? just be happy there even IS an IT position.

    1. Re:the school district model by DJRumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, we've gotta be more concerned about feeding that CEO machine...

    2. Re:the school district model by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why I would complain about no free coffee...

      My work never supplied that :-(

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yah, but don't you get discounts on your burgers?

    4. Re:the school district model by SnapShot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IMHO, getting rid of free coffee is a huge mistake. In the scheme of things it's a tiny expense and you're going to lose far more in terms of people bickering about the coffee fund, people running out "on break" to buy coffee, and the basic office environment.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    5. Re:the school district model by TheSeventh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At the company where I work, they cut off the free coffee last summer, for a cost savings of $80,000 a year. Not exactly a tiny expense, basically one engineer's job.

      Now if we can just get that one engineer whose job it saved to get everybody coffee . . .

      --
      Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not out to get you.
    6. Re:the school district model by ByOhTek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nope, not a burger joint within two miles of here even if they did.

      Do you get your bridge for free, perchance? Does it have a good goat throughput?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    7. Re:the school district model by farrellj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Back in the olden days of Computers...like 10 years ago...I was one of the many who was against unionization of IT workers. Now, having been badly treated by both small companies, and one of the largest single-digit level manufacturers of computers, I see that I was wrong. Today's 'sweatshops' are in computer assembly factories, and in call centers. They both use Skinner like systems with seemingly random rewards and punishments to keep people in line.

      These days, digging ditches is a more profitable and satisfying job...fully unionized, with guaranteed vacation and benefits, and a grievance system that actually works!

      ttyl
                Farrell ...note, I don't dig ditches.

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    8. Re:the school district model by cashman73 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sounds sort of like the plot of a Dilbert cartoon,. . .

    9. Re:the school district model by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My guess though is that if you're spending $80k per year on coffee, then it's for a hell of a lot of people, and that $80k expense (and a single job) IS tiny on that scale. If an $80k expenditure costs a job but improves morale of a few thousand employees enough to make up for it in productivity gains, then it's the right thing to do.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    10. Re:the school district model by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I tend to agree. When the economy goes south, and you either stop giving raises, or start giving paycuts, sometimes the best way to keep employees happy is with relatively minor perks like these. I worked for a company where there was a hiring and raise freeze during a merger. No one was happy. They expaned the free coffee into free hot cocoa as well. It was a minor thing, but the gesture seemed to make people happy.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    11. Re:the school district model by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      These days, digging ditches is a more profitable and satisfying job...fully unionized

      That's because they're getting paid $40 an hour for something anyone with minimal training could do.

      The problem with IT is that there are too many people in the business - the supply is bigger than the demand.

      The answer isn't to unionize to get paid more than the job is worth, the answer is to find another job.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    12. Re:the school district model by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      Wow u guys drink (or waste) a lot of coffee!!! I think its great that everyone took a little cutback to save another employees job, but $80k is seems to be too much to spend on coffee!

      I have a coffeemaker ($40) a thermos ($20) and I drink over a liter of coffee a day, fair trade organic Bolivian full city roast mostly. Not counting the cost of running water or bicycling/driving to/from the coop where I get it, it costs me less than $5 /week. I also have years supply of filters which I paid around $4 for.So here I am way overconsuming coffee (strong coffee too) and even if I bought a few new coffeemakers a year I'd be less than $400/year. Now of course doing things on an institutional level would allow more competive coffee pricing, et cetera.

      From an employer perspective I think giving free coffee is a way to get people to work harder. Ok it doesn't work for people who to take 4 daily coffee breaks and blather instead of working, but if your boss who knows you are going to be fixing bugs all night to meet a deadline,he or she can buy you a thermos full of steaming black liquid infusion that fortifies engineers who have worked well beyond a full day :)

      I think for like $100 worth of chinese food + coffee / employee / year, you could get a lot better work out of your employees, and increase job satisfaction especially when they have to work above and beyond normal expected requirements

    13. Re:the school district model by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Do what I do. Bring your own coffee pot to work. Seriously. The pot sits out, all the time. The coffee and sugar get locked up. When I arrive at work, EARLY every day, I brew a pot. That first cup is ready about the time I clock in. I have Chief's finger, yeah, but that's one of the hazards of the trade. No biggy. And, no I do NOT wash my cup. If ever there is a coffee shortage, I can just add water to my cup & microwave it to get coffee. That should last for a couple months.

      The last job that I walked off of was due to a disagreement with the boss. He said I couldn't "cook" on the job. I warned him. "If the coffee pot goes, I goes. I'm a loyal kind of person. That coffee pot treats me good, and I'm loyal to it."

      Dumbass thought I was kidding, LMAO

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    14. Re:the school district model by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      But are you sure that you really did? And WHY was it so much?

      We had "Flavia" machines for a while. Sure, the selection was nice, but it was probably expensive. It certainly used a lot of packaging that needed to be thrown out. Not very "green".

      Now we have a large coffee maker that makes a whole "urn" at a time, and three urns. One for "Dark", "Regular", and "Decaf"

      We get packets of ground coffee, and the maker is hooked up to the water supply. Cheap to setup, cheap to operate. If they really wanted to save, we could get beans and grind them ourselves.

      Now... take it if we got rid of free coffee. That means I need to go get coffee if I want it... or have a coffee machine at my desk. Either way, that means each and every coffee drinker has to spend time making coffee for himself (instead of once for several people) or has to individually leave, and go get some.

      I would bet that the company loses at least a half hour per coffee drinker per day JUST by not having coffee available right there for the pouring.

      Think that translates into real savings when compared to moving to cheaper methods of supply?

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    15. Re:the school district model by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unions are great in concept, but I've yet to see an example that I like. My buddy works for a large company where it was basically required (even though it is illegal to do so) that he join the union to be hired. He pays dues. He gets no real benefit. And they tell him what he can and can't do.

      Most strikes hurt employees considerably more with lost wages than they gain in negotiation. Humans are corrupt. Just as management is corrupt, so is union leadership. It just becomes another thing for someone to flaunt around in a pissing contest, rather than use the position to better life for union members.

      Conversely, there is the free market model. My last job kept laying people off, and gave me two pay cuts. I assumed there weren't better jobs because of the economy, but I finally looked. I moved to a much better company where not only am I treated better, but I almost doubled my salary.

      The reason my last company was able to cut salaries and treat people terribly is because we allowed it. When I was hired there about 3 years ago, the IT staff was about 50 people. When I left it was maybe a dozen. I was one of 3 SysAdmins standing, and they weren't even filling my position when I left. I've since heard the other 2 SysAdmins have put in their resignation. Now the company will be forced to try and hire a new staff in a hurry. More than likely, they're going to pay more to hire new staff than keep those they ran off.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    16. Re:the school district model by Dishevel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow u guys drink (or waste) a lot of coffee!!! I think its great that everyone took a little cutback to save another employees job, but $80k is seems to be too much to spend on coffee!

      I have a coffeemaker ($40) a thermos ($20) and I drink over a liter of coffee a day, fair trade organic Bolivian full city roast mostly. Not counting the cost of running water or bicycling/driving to/from the coop where I get it, it costs me less than $5 /week.

      and your handle is cmdr tofu You don't happen to live in San Fransisco do you?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    17. Re:the school district model by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      Damn.. I never got Free Coffee at my job.. of course the workers made a communal coffee pool I could buy into if I wanted too.. basic coffee at like $2/mo or so.

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
    18. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a member of the IT union in Denmark, called PROSA ( http://www.prosa.dk ). Definitely worth it. So far I've gotten an extra week of vacation out of it.

    19. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my "office" (a research institution) we pay 10 cents EURO for each cup of coffee we take. It is not "free" but it is also not a lot of money.

      At my previous University (in the UK) it was a "voluntary" payment (you paid whatever you wanted). Professors paid more and PhD students paid less (just the odd coin you had... to avoid feeling bad).

      Even if you assume the coffee costs $1 x cup, one person could cost around $260 per year on coffees alone (assuming she only drinks one cup of coffee every day... something that IT people won't do).

    20. Re:the school district model by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      just be happy there even IS an IT position

      If the position wasn't necessary it wouldn't be there. Now, how many of you are so against unions? Seems there needs to be an IT Guild.

    21. Re:the school district model by Spykk · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have always thought of programming as the art of converting caffeine into an executable. Coffee is part of the cost of doing business.

    22. Re:the school district model by drsquare · · Score: 0

      IMHO, getting rid of free coffee is a huge mistake. In the scheme of things it's a tiny expense and you're going to lose far more in terms of people bickering about the coffee fund, people running out "on break" to buy coffee, and the basic office environment.

      No chance of workers simply making their own damn coffee, like in every other workplace in the entire world? IT is no longer a glamour industry, it's just another job, and they can expect the same conditions as everyone else.

    23. Re:the school district model by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Based on the level of detail you put into describing your coffee habits, I'm guessing the caffeine has kicked in. ;)

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    24. Re:the school district model by oscarwumpus · · Score: 5, Funny

      You might want to look at the math. If you, as an individual, drank $400 of coffee per year, that would lead to $80,000 of coffee per year covering over 200 employees. Or 100 employees who drink twice as much as you do. Or 50 employees who suffer severe shakes, headaches, and moments of telepathy. Or 25 employees who swim in tanks filled with the spice melange and wrap space-time so heighliner ships can reach their destinations. And that may be money well spent. Or 1 to 5 employees who were selling coffee to the other employees using company funds.

    25. Re:the school district model by SnapShot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I found a quick quote that claimed "the general rule of thumb for office coffee service pricing is $60 to $120 per employee per year." So he's talking about a business with at least 667 employees and probably close to 1000.

      So, if the average employee is 0.1% more productive with free coffee getting rid of the free coffee was a bad business decision and the Cxx (COO, CFO, whatever) who made that decision should be beaten to death with his own intestines or fired.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    26. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a HR manager I say that is way cheaper to fire all the American IT staff and hire 20 chinese or indian per each American I send to the Unemployment line. That is why I spent my Holidays improving my Mandarin, American employees are overrated and expensive, and if an IT company wants to really grow it has to do like IBM: fire all Americans and move offices overseas.

    27. Re:the school district model by MadKeithV · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hear that Chinese HR managers are 20 times cheaper too.

    28. Re:the school district model by TheSeventh · · Score: 1

      It was for about 1000 employees, so SnapShot was right on target.

      We had the Urns as well, 3 per kitchen area (regular, decaf and other -> flavored, or extra strong, or just another regular pot). Now we have the flavia machines for 50 - 75 cents a cup.

      They also cut down and made everybody (even VPs we were told) use Economy class for flights. The price difference here worked out to about 7 Economy fares for 1 business class ticket, and before this, Everybody was allowed Business Class (~$1300 for Economy to ~$9500 for Business for the most common destination).

      --
      Just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean that they're not out to get you.
    29. Re:the school district model by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      I do make my own coffee, even though the company provides free coffee. The company coffee is horrible beyond belief, although I think it is the buildings water. Good thing the company also provides free bottled water (water coolers with the 5 gallon jugs). Fresh ground coffee beans (roasted locally) + the companies bottled water make for an excellent cup. I drink a pot a day, sometimes more.

    30. Re:the school district model by flabordec · · Score: 2, Funny

      the Cxx (COO, CFO, whatever) who made that decision should be beaten to death with his own intestines

      Wow! That's a bit harsh just for a 0.1% loss of productivity!

      --
      "I see undead people" Warcraft III - Necromancer
    31. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Most strikes hurt employees considerably more with lost wages than they gain in negotiation."

      Except that laborers today have some semblance of Workers' Rights thanks to the strikes in which our forefathers participated, literally putting their lives on the line.
      But is most schools history class ignores the labor movement.

    32. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm a CEO. Seriously - smallish company.

      I gave several of my top performers substantial raises as of Jan 1st, and I insist on free coffee for all. Fresh ground beans, not pre-ground garbage.

    33. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unions were for workers rights. Now that more laws are in place to protect the workers, Unions seem to be in it mostly for themselves. My uncle worked in a carpenter union for 7 years, and every pay raise was matched with an equal increase in dues. At the end of 7 years, he was taking home nearly the exact amount of money per paycheck as when he started, even after bi-annual pay raises and a promotion.

      The concept of Unions is still very important. It is a tool, to be used to upset the establishment and give strength to the workers. In the absense of oppresive employers, Unions harm the workers more than they help, but we still need them, for without them employees just become a meat commodity again.

      That said, I was told after being hired for a job that I had to join the Union for that employment. I continued to work for three weeks before it became harassment to join, then I just walked off the job. Even got refunded the automatic union deductions.

    34. Re: the school district model by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My office has free coffee -- a dozen kinds of Keurig pods -- and a free soda fountain. We all got pretty miffed when they down-sized the free cups, but, meh.

      It's about $25-50/week not spent at the overpriced retail joints. Figure 200 employees at ten minutes, once a day to run downstairs, that's 166 hours of lost productivity -- or somewhere between $5-10K PER WEEK. To the employees, that's about $250K of collective benefit. To the employer, it's about double that in productivity not lost to everyone schlepping downstairs for coffee and soda.

      On the other hand, my mother's office eliminated their coffee service, one kind, giant urn of Yuban, claiming it was an unnecessary expense. That manager got a bonus for reducing overhead...

    35. Re:the school district model by compro01 · · Score: 1

      More detailed analysis

      Bulk kicking horse coffee costs about $12/pound, so they're using 6666 pounds per year.

      1 pound will make about 96 250ml cups of coffee. (YMMV)

      That comes to 640,000 cups of coffee per year or 1750 per day.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    36. Re:the school district model by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 1

      They doubled your salary? Was that the salary before or after all the wage cuts at the old place?

    37. Re:the school district model by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      A guild and a union are not precisely the same thing. I would sooner join a guild than a union - but I'm not a joiner to start with. I'd have to watch it, and see how it worked before I was willing to join. Today's unions in the US of A are mostly dead. They'll stay dormant, until the market improves. And, one other thing. My part of the country never was union. These "Right to work" states don't recognize a right to a fair wage, or a decent living standard. Union members might brag of $20 to $40 per hour in Chicago, or New York, but people doing the same job around here get $10 to $15 per hour. Phhht. That's your "trickle down" economy. Most of us have to wait to be pissed on to realize any benefit of a good economy. If and when the economy is good, that is.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    38. Re:the school district model by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Preach on, brother. Coffee is the REAL vitamin C!

    39. Re:the school district model by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I went from $40,000 salary (before pay cuts) to $35/hr hourly which is about $73,000 annually, assuming no overtime (which I qualify for now as an hourly employee).

      I just went to a company that values IT significanlty more than my last shop.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    40. Re:the school district model by Maniacal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what if they were serving cat shit coffee??

      "Kopi Luwak was the most expensive coffee in the world, selling for between $100 and $600 USD per pound"

      http://www.dailynugget.com/2006/06/shit-coffee/
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kopi_Luwak

      --
      MG
    41. Re:the school district model by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was part of a recent double merger (where two companies split a division off their parent companies to form a third "independent" company).
      They flew damn near *all* the managers from one company over to see the other execs for a face to face.

      One company in the US the other in Europe...
      The airfare alone could have paid my wages, healthcare, perks, etc. for two full years. The per-diam and hotel costs could have paid an additional year and change of the same.

      Forgive me for being a little bitter that they laid me off (one of only two developers for an in-house designed test system).

      In a twist of justice by karma, there were two different HR groups who were handling the "getting rid of people we can lose" work. One was handing out golden handshakes to get people to retire early, the other got rid of redundancies. Now, you see I was the primary owner for lab maintenance (but there were others that could do that job), and I was the backup for about half a dozen other functions closely related to the lab I maintained. Software development was one of those backups when our primary dev was on holiday, or out sick, or simply overloaded with too much work at one time (we seemed to have a feast or famine cycle that no one could figure out how to smooth out).

      The other dev took a golden handshake, while I was redundified. I picked up a job with the parent company, in a lab, doing much the same kind of development work as before I started maintenance, with a manager I worked with years before in yet another division of the same company. (Lesson kids: never *ever* burn bridges unless you have no choice. Swallowing some pride now can save your bacon big time later).

      When they realized that both their devs had been let go they tried to call either of us back. The senior dev declined, and I offered to provide contract assistance at a nearly extortionist rate (easily 3x what they were paying me). It was pointed out to me that I was unlikely to get hired if asking that much money, to which I replied "who said I wanted to be hired?"

      Yeah, so I should stop rambling now... but your flight thing kind of triggered me.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    42. Re:the school district model by Protocol16 · · Score: 1

      This sounds like when MindSpring and Earthlink merged. Union reps were hanging out all over the place since all the MindSpringer's saw the writing on the wall. Several years later, no more US reps are left, all the call centers are closed, etc.

      --
      Don't click here...
    43. Re:the school district model by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      My guess though is that if you're spending $80k per year on coffee, then it's for a hell of a lot of people, and that $80k expense (and a single job) IS tiny on that scale.

      Starbucks non-fat latte via rewards card: $3
      100 Employees: 50x$3= $150/day
      270 work days: $80,100

      So really, what's a "hell of a lot of people"? (Okay, no CFO in their right mind would give people free Starbucks...)

    44. Re:the school district model by datapharmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While that may have worked at your business I disagree. I recently had a discussion with someone at another IT company and we were bashing just this practice. It seems that every couple months there will be a round of paycuts or firings followed by bowling night/movie night/new fancy coffee maker and donuts in the break room... to the point that those who have been around a while shudder every time they see or hear about any "perks". This may work in some places, but in general engineers and IT people are not morons.... we can see a trojan horse when it is placed in the break room.

      --
      Get a web developer
    45. Re:the school district model by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      Last time any company I was associated with did this they started losing entire departments of employees. The most common explanation on the exit interview: "I can't get anything done. Nothing is taken care of until it completely breaks, and event hen it sometimes takes days or weeks to be fixed. When I ask for help I can't understand the people I am talking to."

      --
      Get a web developer
    46. Re:the school district model by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Cheap engineers, or horrible benefits?

      Anyways, everyone walking down t get coffee from someplace else will cost a lot more then 80K a year.
      Even worse of you have a coffee fund. Which is the ultimate power from the most petty of people.

      In my area, there is still a demand for software engineers.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    47. Re:the school district model by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I've never worked a single job where there wasn't free coffee with only one exception.
      Round table Pizza: free coffee (and soda, beer, pizza)
      Retail chain: no coffee (sucky job too)
      Car Sales: Free coffee (had to lease my soul to the devil though)
      Retail electronics junk store: Free coffee (single coolest job I've ever had)***
      Tech industry at two companies (one startup, one fortune 50): Free coffee

      ***
      Ever here of HSC electronics? They buy overstock, old product, EOL/Obsolete equipment, surplus, whatever else. Resell it on-line and through three (now two) retail locations. For a geek who's been playing with electronics since I was three years old this was far from a kid in a candy store, more like a coke head in a crank refinery (or something like that). ended up working there for a few years, even after I was working at the tech company startup. Our VP came in one day and asked the manager "nB" still working here? I thought he got another job. Why do you keep him on for only one day a week? Manager replied that he couldn't fire me, because I spent my entire paycheck in the store.

      It was good for my bank account when they finally closed that store.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    48. Re:the school district model by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Except the brain adjust the receptors to compensate for the increase caffeine in about 2 week. The means after two weeks you need coffee just to stay at minimal productivity.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    49. Re:the school district model by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      He pays dues. He gets no real benefit. And they tell him what he can and can't do.

      Sounds like my home owner's association.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    50. Re:the school district model by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm in a engineer Union, COPPEA. It's awesome and works well.

      "Most strikes hurt employees considerably more with lost wages than they gain in negotiatio"
      False.

      "so is union leadership. "
      Yes they can ebcem corrpupt, but that doesn't mean they wil;l or that the employees can't change that.

      "The reason my last company was able to cut salaries and treat people terribly is because we allowed it. "
      If only you had a common group that appointed a leader to negotiate with management~
      Unions are how you don't let an organization treat you terribly.

      It's sounds like that company is positioning it self as an attractive to potential buyers.

      I work 4 10s, have great benefits, and have protections so I can discusses merits of an idea without worrying about recourse or in fighting.

      Your argument that humans can be corrupt and therefore everything is corrupt is laughable myopic and quite frankly, stupid.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    51. Re:the school district model by Grygus · · Score: 1

      the Cxx (COO, CFO, whatever) who made that decision should be beaten to death with his own intestines

      Wow! That's a bit harsh just for a 0.1% loss of productivity!

      It's on the same scale as their rewards system. A 0.1% gain in productivity would have set him up for life.

    52. Re:the school district model by taoye · · Score: 1

      Yeah, really. In real life, said Cxx will just get some government stimulus money to make up for the productivity loss, anyways.

    53. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that it is an unusual luxury is why it is called a "perk." I think you missed the point.

    54. Re:the school district model by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I've never once seen a strike make the news where the benefits gained outweighed the lost wages. Every single professional sports strike has worked this way. Flight attendant strikes worked this way. The Writer's Guild strike worked this way.

      I see it time and time again. A union head gets pissy, demands a strike, and all the employees suffer.

      The worst was the recent NHL strike. NHL players made money comparable to the NFL, despite the NHL having 2% of the TV revenue of the NFL. The union head got pissy and demanded a strike.

      Not only did players lose wages and an entire season, not only did the Stanley Cup not get awarded, but the players came back under a much worse contract. They went from no cap, to a cap, with a 27% pay cut across the board. Even worse, the league lost their primary TV contracts, and it will be some time (if ever) before the league recovers.

      Again, I've not once seen a single strike in my lifetime actually benefit the union members.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    55. Re:the school district model by haruharaharu · · Score: 1

      IMHO, getting rid of coffee or cutting back on paper cups (really) smacks of desperation or insane cheapness. Really good reason for the skilled people to run away.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    56. Re:the school district model by shaka999 · · Score: 1

      Until I get free soda I say screw the coffee drinkers!!!!!

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    57. Re:the school district model by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      And as a diuretic it gives new meaning to the term, "zip and ship."

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    58. Re:the school district model by caffeinemessiah · · Score: 1

      If you, as an individual, drank $400 of coffee per year

      Except workplaces rarely have a Starbucks barista making cappucinos. It's usually drip filter coffee. A large tin of Chock Full O' Nuts costs anywhere between $10 - $20 and would last about two months for the average person (unless you like to load the basket up all the way). Given that workplace coffee is generally shite, I'd say your total expense per person is a maximum of $60-$120. Factor in bulk discounts at a place like Costco and you're looking at something like $50 - $80 tops a year for a heavy drinker. So it isn't all that bad.

      --
      An old-timer with old-timey ideas.
    59. Re:the school district model by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      That's probably because you're still small enough to actually care about your lower level employees. Still, as a CEO, you shouldn't be posting on ./. You should be too busy to actually RTFM and post; your secretary should be doing that for you.

    60. Re:the school district model by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Of course you wouldn't complain, you never had it in the first place. Once you've worked for a place that supplies it, you start to get used to it, and when they take it away, it really sucks.

      I know its much better to still have a job and no perks like this than to keep the perks and have people laid off. Still, getting rid of this stuff is going to decrease morale, and usually they don't come back, even when times are good.

    61. Re:the school district model by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why I would complain about no free coffee...

      My work never supplied that :-(

      They should. It's not like everyone drinks it, but people appreciate the little things and it shows in their work, especially when the work is related to coffee.

      One time at my workplace the power went out for several hours. As soon as we realized there wouldn't be coffee for break, I raced to the nearest hardware store and picked up a diesel generator for our coffee maker. When I came back though, they had jury-rigged a system that siphoned power from the emergency lighting to power it instead...

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    62. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, what timing. This morning when our company announced that it was canceling the coffee service to save money, I immediately asked what that savings would be. $200 a month was the answer, for our location which employs roughly 130 people. I was floored. If our financial situation is that serious, maybe I need to start looking for another job?

        - Long time lurker, first time commenter.

    63. Re:the school district model by Jawn98685 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The answer isn't to unionize to get paid more than the job is worth, the answer is to find another job.

      Really? It seems to work quite well for the ditch diggers, or rather, for the ditch diggers who were smart enough to organize and negotiate a living wage through collective bargaining. Meanwhile, the Fox News-watching ditch diggers are proudly toiling for $11 an hour and no benefits.
      I'd say that "the answer" is to get that union card.

    64. Re:the school district model by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're better off. A boss not realizing an engineer's attachment to his coffee source? I can't imagine he displayed much competency in other aspects of the business.

    65. Re:the school district model by KC7JHO · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And now that all the IT people are from China, we need an HR manager that understands the culture... and keeps the same time schedule... and that feels more approachable to our new employees, and is payed along the same lines as our new IT staff. Hmmmm yes, you just outsourced your own job... idiot!

    66. Re:the school district model by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's your "trickle down" economy

      That "trickle down" always reminds me of The Outlaw Josey Wales: "Senator, don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." Wealth doesn't trickle down, it flows upwards. Wealth is created on the factory floor, the fry cook's stove, the programmer's cube. The suits in the corner office don't create wealth, they merely aggregate and control it.

    67. Re:the school district model by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      See... Increased production! Better attention to detail! Happier employee, as long as you don't threaten the supply of the black stuff. What's not to love?

    68. Re:the school district model by Aeros · · Score: 1

      Plus if you have several dozen people with their own coffee makers going this adds up to alot of electricity and could actually be a fir hazard in some cases..some people still use the old ass coffeemakers that might not be very safe.

    69. Re:the school district model by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      Sure, for you. If you think there is a lot of IT outsourcing now, just wait until IT unionizes... Some stuff, like construction cannot be outsourced. IT can. My company did it. Did it work well? No. Did it work well enough for the company to survive and post a bigger profit to the bottom line? Yes. Unions served their purpose in the past, but now the unions are bigger and badder than the big, bad, evil corporations they were created to protect the workers from. In a global economy, we are all going to have to accept that there are workers in Asia that are willing to work for subsistence wages, and that is going to affect our wages in the US and Europe. The key is not to unionize. Unions work until everyone is in a union, and if everyone is in a union the playing field is once again level and unions don't help. The key is to raise everyone's standard of living globally, but that will never happen due to human nature.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    70. Re:the school district model by Aeros · · Score: 1

      heh..don't ya love how these companies save money. I went through something somewhat similar and it amazes me that these companies are usually successful with all the backwards decisions they make and the money they end up wasting on these bad decisions. Glad it all worked out.

    71. Re:the school district model by Manfred+Maccx · · Score: 1
      You first said:

      (Lesson kids: never *ever* burn bridges unless you have no choice. Swallowing some pride now can save your bacon big time later)

      Then you go with:

      and I offered to provide contract assistance at a nearly extortionist rate (easily 3x what they were paying me). It was pointed out to me that I was unlikely to get hired if asking that much money, to which I replied "who said I wanted to be hired?"

      Me think that you still not have learned your lesson on burning bridges...

    72. Re:the school district model by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      My guess though is that if you're spending $80k per year on coffee, then it's for a hell of a lot of people, and that $80k expense (and a single job) IS tiny on that scale. If an $80k expenditure costs a job but improves morale of a few thousand employees enough to make up for it in productivity gains, then it's the right thing to do.

      Wait, average cost for a cup of coffee is about $0.05 (Cheap coffee) so they are trying to say that annually they dole out 1,600,000 cups of coffee:

      Adjusting for work week we get:
      250 Working Days we get 6400 cups per day.

      Lets look at the national average of 3.2 cups of coffee per person\per day:

      That is about 2000 people they were buying coffee for. I'd be curious what the % of the budget is in contrast to leasing. Might be cheaper to have them all telecommute and buy their own coffee. Win Win

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    73. Re:the school district model by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      subtle difference
      I don't want to work there, made it clear, but said "for this much" I'll do it anyway.

      I see your point though.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    74. Re:the school district model by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      .. to the point that those who have been around a while shudder every time they see or hear about any "perks". This may work in some places, but in general engineers and IT people are not morons.... we can see a trojan horse when it is placed in the break room.

      If I can only afford to give you coffee, and not a raise, you're going to bitch about getting the coffee? There's a little thing that can try to ease the pain. No one claims its as good as getting a raise, its simply a gesture that's affordable because the raise is not.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    75. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I ask for help I can't understand the people I am talking to.

      Man, I hear that! BTW, what's an "event hen"?

    76. Re:the school district model by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Or you could just buy some ground coffee, a hot plate, and an ibrik and brew your own freaking coffee.

    77. Re:the school district model by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I work from home now, so I make my own coffee. When I was working in the lab, I realised that, for the price I was spending buying cups of coffee, I could afford to buy enough coffee beans to give everyone else in the lab coffee for free and still save money (and be drinking nicer coffee). I moved my coffee grinder into the kitchen and bought beans from a local shop (which knocked around 25% off the price because of the amount of coffee I ended up buying) and got the others to chip in. We ended up paying a lot less and drinking decent coffee.

      The point is that the total cost of buying coffee was tiny in comparison to how much we were being paid. If we'd been buying in larger quantities (e.g. for the whole building, rather than just the lab) we'd have paid even less. The department probably wouldn't have noticed the cost.

      This was a university research lab, but in a company that depends on the productivity of its workers, the cost of buying them decent tea is very small. One of the things I like when I visit Google is that they have a decent coffee machine on each floor. If their engineers want coffee, they can go, grab a cup, and discuss things. This means that they spend more time in the building being productive. The total cost per person is tiny compared to their salary.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    78. Re:the school district model by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I never understood how people get away with abusing budgets like that. If it was a home family budget, and you didn't use up all your entertainment expenses, it would normally just be considered saved. Throwing a blowout party at the end of the year when you're struggling to make ends meet would be considered wasteful.

      But in business and institutions this sort of thing happens. People will buy stuff they don't need just because they have some budget left over. The rationale is that if they don't spend it, they'll get a smaller budget next year or be penalized in other ways for not accurately planning the budget. The incentive to save money is reduced.

    79. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clock in AFTER making coffee? Seriously? Now THAT is what I call work ethic!

    80. Re:the school district model by zurtle · · Score: 1

      A job flipping burgers would explain why and how you're feeding the troll :-P~

      --
      Couldn't stand the weather
    81. Re:the school district model by jcoy42 · · Score: 1

      the Cxx (COO, CFO, whatever) who made that decision should be beaten to death with his own intestines or fired.

      Can't it be both?

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    82. Re:the school district model by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Strikes don't benefit the union - if they did then they would be on strike all of the time. They hurt the employers a lot more though. Look at the recent Royal Mail strike in the UK, which cost the company their contract with Amazon and some others. That's the point.

      The vast majority of union negotiations don't end in strikes. Striking is the nuclear option, for when all else fails.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    83. Re:the school district model by Webcommando · · Score: 1

      My company provides free coffee (the kind that is "fresh" brewed in a machine) that isn't terrible but won't win any awards. They also had Starbucks brewed in the cafeteria for 50 cents. After they raised the price to a $1.50, I decided it was time I do something.

      I have a cup that is a single serving french press. I can buy a pound of my favorite blend and it will last a couple of weeks (2 cups a day). The savings is really significant for very little extra effort and the coffee is just the way I like it. Just add grinds, hot water, wait 4 minutes, and press!

      I don't care how on topic my post is...I just want everyone to buy a french press...you'll be glad you did.

      --
      I love the sound of distortion in the morning -- webcommando
    84. Re:the school district model by BitZtream · · Score: 0, Troll

      running out "on break" to buy coffee

      I have a far simpler solution to this problem.

      When they get back, you tell them they are fired. It doesn't take that happening too many times before you stop having 'break' problems.

      Reality check: You aren't special, neither are your skills. You are essentially a computer janitor (regardless of your actual position). You can be replaced, and in a few short years your skills will in no way be special as any grade school kid will be able to do your job, probably better since they've grown up with technology. If you don't realize this, you're already past the point of no return.

      Your job isn't there to provide you benefits. You do not have any special rights because you work on computers. Why is it that computer geeks seem to have this retarded notion that you somehow deserve to get treated differently than the rest of the world? You need to pull your head out of your ass and realize that 'the basic office environment' as you think of it, isn't the basic office environment for pretty much any other job in the world outside of geekdom.

      As soon as the need for computer literate people is balanced by the number of them, all perks will end and you'll be treated just like the guy in a steel mill, the guy building skyscrapers, and the guy who takes out your trash.

      You are not entitled to anything, get over yourself. The fact that you got modded insightful just shows how many people who read slashdot now are so incredible out of touch. When I got into the field, I was excited about all the cool perks geeks get because of their rarity. Its been that way just long enough that all the little wanna-be geeks such as yourself think that you are entitled to such treatment, rather than realizing those were just initial perks to make up for the lack of available talent. There is no longer a lack of available talent, you have nothing to offer over the guy who is willing to go to work without coffee and willing to work for a wage you are actually worth rather than demanding a wage that you are in no way deserve.

      You are spoiled and unfortunately in for a very rude awakening and reality check over the next few years. Have fun, I'll enjoy watching you leave because you didn't get your coffee, mean while, I'll pull my drinks out of the bag I brought with me to work as I'm watching you walk out the door whining like a little bitch.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    85. Re:the school district model by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      Err the normal overhead means that saving $80,000 would you only save a job paying $25/26 so /13 or half an engineer. The problem is that HR are often bonused on things that work against the long term interests of the company.

    86. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should post the name of the company here as AC, so that we know not to go to work there - I'd never want to work for a company that would do that to its people.

    87. Re:the school district model by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      As Steve McConnell noted a long time ago, one of the major reasons you supply free coffee and free pop is to keep your employees close to their desks. If people walk across the street to starbucks twice a day, or even to the cafeteria, , that's 30 minutes of productivity per day you lost. Assuming $70k a year for a developer, those walks across the street cost you $4300/year. It's a lot cheaper to buy a coffee machine.

      The phrase "false economy" comes to mind.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    88. Re:the school district model by Xeno+man · · Score: 1

      But there is a difference between doing something to make an employee happy and a token jester that makes the stupid employees happy. Some managers get this, some think that a pizza party solves everything.

    89. Re:the school district model by The+Barking+Dog · · Score: 1

      I figured once that it cost me $0.40 per day to make coffee at home, given the weight of beans I grind per pot and the filtered water I use. That's $146 per year, or $104 if I only made it five days a week. So, $60 to $120 per year isn't far off.

    90. Re:the school district model by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      I went from $40,000 salary (before pay cuts) to $35/hr hourly which is about $73,000 annually, assuming no overtime (which I qualify for now as an hourly employee).

      I just went to a company that values IT significanlty more than my last shop.

      That certainly is an option all IT employees can use. Tell me, do they still need 500K+ new workers?

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    91. Re:the school district model by awfar · · Score: 1

      I just spent a minutes on Google Earth lurking around some of the places I visited in Mountain View, Santa Clara, Palo Alto sometime shortly after Atari went bust IIRC. Weird Stuff, Frys, Computability(? book store) and if I remember right HSC. There was also "Halstead" (Hdb?) Electronics up in Redwood City - looks like it is now gone. I'm glad (not!) that I grew up in the midwest where we had literally *none* of those places - nearest Radio Shack was 45 minutes away. Leaving SFO I had to pack extra careful just to fly home with all the junk I bought! I could not imagine the problems I would have today checking it in my luggage.

    92. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully I'll be out buying my refreshments when the weird sociopath guy in the corner who's always bringing his own coffee in goes crazy and starts shooting people.

    93. Re:the school district model by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      Jules: Mmmm! Goddamn, Jimmie! This is some serious gourmet shit! Usually, me and Vince would be happy with some freeze-dried Taster's Choice right, but he springs this serious GOURMET shit on us! What flavor is this?

      Jimmie: Knock it off, Julie.

      Jules: [pause] What?

      Jimmie: I don't need you to tell me how fucking good my coffee is, okay? I'm the one who buys it. I know how good it is. When Bonnie goes shopping she buys SHIT. I buy the gourmet expensive stuff because when I drink it I want to taste it. But you know what's on my mind right now? It AIN'T the coffee in my kitchen, it's the dead nigger in my garage.

      Jules: Oh, Jimmie, don't even worry about that...

      Jimmie: No, No, No, No, let me ask you a question. When you came pulling in here, did you notice a sign out in front of my house that said Dead Nigger Storage?

      Jules: Jimmie, you know I ain't seen no...

      Jimmie: Did you notice a sign out in front of my house that said Dead Nigger Storage?

      Jules: [pause] No. I didn't.

      Jimmie: You know WHY you didn't see that sign?

      Jules: Why?

      Jimmie: 'Cause it ain't there, 'cause storing dead niggers ain't my fucking business, that's why!

      --
      Squirrel!
    94. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, no CFO in their right mind would give people free Starbucks
      Right, he'd shop around and find a better option. He'd also negotiate a bulk discount.

    95. Re:the school district model by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Okay, no CFO in their right mind would give people free Starbucks...

      It's not the same as getting a cup at Starbucks, but we have the Starbucks machines that don't cost us employees.. see:
      http://www.starbucks.com/business/ocslist.asp

    96. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I LOL'd at this...

    97. Re:the school district model by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU. Free coffee but the sodas are 70 cents?

    98. Re:the school district model by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

      That's around 2 100 000 cups of Java so around 800 000 mugs of coffee ... yea right!

    99. Re:the school district model by Taikutusu · · Score: 1

      I have always thought of programming as the art of converting caffeine into an executable. Coffee is part of the cost of doing business.

      Mathematicians had the monopoly on this first, since they are devices for turning coffee into theorems.

    100. Re: the school district model by NateTech · · Score: 1

      There, you nailed it. It's all about incentives. That manager knew he'd get that bonus, and acted as anyone would with a carrot in front of them on a stick.

      Companies really need to:
      a) decide exactly what their priorities are.
      b) create incentives to match.

      That fixes a whole lot of evils, when those two relatively simple things are done right.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    101. Re:the school district model by treeves · · Score: 1

      I would say coffee is more than a minor perk. Besides that, I prefer espresso, drip or French press - basically almost any method - to percolation!

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    102. Re:the school district model by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      I think you mean a token gesture. A token jester is the middle manager who came up with replacing jobs with perks the remaining employees don't want.

    103. Re:the school district model by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      In these parts, I suspect that these days few workers would be caught dead drinking office coffee, favoring the daily ritual of going to a coffee shop and competing to see who can use the most words to order their $5 coffee drink.

      Mind you, I can't stand coffee and haven't worked in an office in ten years, but I can extrapolate based on my wife :D

    104. Re:the school district model by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I hate to be pedantic (okay, actually I love it), but given the various costs of an FTE above salary, $80k/yr would probably translate to what, $50k of salary? Seems low for an engineer today.

    105. Re:the school district model by bronney · · Score: 1

      My problem with this logic is why not give me a raise at the price of the coffee, so I can buy my own coffee. What if I don't like coffee. I can save up 2 coffees for a red bull.

    106. Re:the school district model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tend to agree. When the economy goes south, and you either stop giving raises, or start giving paycuts

      No you don't, and only idiots will accept those conditions. If anyone I know accept paycuts I am going to slap them - hard. Demanding fair pay is harder when more and more people accept unreasonable demands.

    107. Re:the school district model by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      The company that I work for has a number of partners. Its a complicated relationship to say the least. Well it was realized that if all of our partner institutions got together and decided on one specific brand of one specific item, they could save a few million dollars a year by negotiating their purchase together.

      Now, before you imaging this item is too complicated... its basically a specially shaped plastic cup.

      So a meeting was called, it was filled with about 10 high level executives from the various institutions. They talked, they discussed. They adjourned...without a decision.

      So in addition to continuing to waste a few million a year, they wasted each others very expensive time. Excellent.
      We figiured that meeting had to cost a few grand an hour.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    108. Re:the school district model by jacksinn · · Score: 1

      There is a CWA (Communications Workers of America) labor union in the U.S. and I've attempted to contact them but haven't heard anything back. I've contacted the national as well as the local branch. Perhaps I'll stop by the union hall itself.

      --
      Life==Jeopardy. All the answers are right in front us - the hard part is coming up with the correct question.
    109. Re:the school district model by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      My problem with this logic is why not give me a raise at the price of the coffee, so I can buy my own coffee. What if I don't like coffee. I can save up 2 coffees for a red bull.

      Because the raise I can give you for the price of coffee is far less than what it will cost you buy your own coffee. Buying in bulk has savings. So does the decreased transaction costs of not needing to recoup costs of other coworkers drinking your coffee (intentional or accidental stealing). So does the ability to brew an entire pot at a time, saving on filters and coffee pots needed. Also, there's the time. It costs time to go to Starbucks or have everyone make their own.

      Buying coffee increases comradery around the office to some degree, as it creates more of a community. This helps intraoffice interaction.

      Also, it's pretty well proven that most people value $1 of coffee more than the dollar, as a gift.

      Our per-employee, per-month coffee costs are $5/employee/month. That's $2.50 more in your paycheck (or $1.80 after payroll taxes, or maybe $1.50 after all taxes if you're in a low 16% bracket). That's less than a cup at Starbucks, which is a few blocks away at any rate.

      So, wouldn't you rather have all the coffee you want at the office? Even if you don't, cannot you imagine the vast majority of employees choosing that?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    110. Re:the school district model by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Plus the cost of the cups, sugar, cream, the electricity to run it, the coffee machine itself. Probably the single biggest cost is the labor of paying someone to take care of all of that.

    111. Re:the school district model by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      Goodness no, I live in rural Connecticut.

  2. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every job is different. Every career is different. Things ebb and flow. For a long time, IT workers were spoiled primadonna. Now they're just another cost center. Guess what, the economy is jacked up. Budget cuts have to happen. IT is a necessity, but so is efficiency, cost control, etc. Welcome to the real world you big f'ing crybabies.

    1. Re:So? by armanox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now they're just another cost center. .

      No, we (IT) has been viewed as a cost center since the 90s. And sometimes as glorified janitors...

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    2. Re:So? by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      IT IS a cost center. Any department that doesn't have direct revenue is a cost center.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    3. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the IT department suddenly starts charging for work to be done on a per job basis, so that it can make money too, if only from other departments.

      That tends to get the value of IT noticed as more than a money drain.

    4. Re:So? by yog · · Score: 1

      my response to the no-coffee situation: I bought a stainless steel 34-ounce thermos and fill it with a pot of decaf from freshly ground beans brewed in my French press every morning before work. This gives me two huge, rich, delicious cups of java that are better than anything I've ever found in a Starbucks, much less an office kitchenette. The cost is about $0.25 a day (not counting amortization of the grinder, press, and thermos). This saves me about $4/day to purchase the watery brown gunk they call coffee downstairs in the cafeteria.

      I am mixed about the free coffee thing. It's really nice to have coffee and tea, and in my opinion it is worth the expense to a company because it makes it a nicer and more comfortable place to work. On the other hand, I've worked in hellholes that had free coffee, too. Start-ups tend to be on a shoestring budget and everyone understands that; at some places I've worked, people bring in their own stuff and share it, and occasionally the founders spring for lunch on their dime. I think that's a more refreshing attitude than this entitlement attitude that the company should give us this and that.

      I interviewed last year at a well known internet company that had a wonderful kitchen/dining area, with free continental breakfast--bagels, fruit, yogurt, coffee, tea, juice--and various other perks. However the interview process itself was silly and indeed this office had a rep for being generally chaotic and unpleasant.

      I guess there's little correlation these days between comfort food and quality of work environment. Just suck it up and brew your own!

      --
      it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
    5. Re:So? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the real world you big f'ing crybabies.

      You've obviously never BEEN in the real world, you overpaid spoiled troll (CEO?). Go broke and work for a living before you flame us honest hard working people.

    6. Re:So? by tomcode · · Score: 1

      Yeah but as a janitor at Google, I get to spend 20% of my work day experimenting with cross-ontology semantic web reification algorithms.

      --
      f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng
    7. Re:So? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      We can has be seen?!?

    8. Re:So? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      No, we (IT) has been viewed as a cost center since the 90s. And sometimes as glorified janitors...

      And honestly, I don't have a problem with that. We are glorified janitors and maintenance men. What bothers me more is the idea that janitors and maintenance men aren't deserving of respect. Being a janitor isn't easy or fun work, but it needs to be done. Spend a little time thinking about what your company would be like if not for the janitors.

      Calling tech support "glorified janitors" doesn't need to be an insult.

    9. Re:So? by russotto · · Score: 1

      IT IS a cost center. Any department that doesn't have direct revenue is a cost center.

      Which means everything but sales and service. Which is a general problem with that way of looking at things. When you make a product and the departments with the people actually designing and building that product are looked at at cost centers to be trimmed, whereas the people who sell it are looked at as revenue sources who should be rewarded, it tends to breed resentment.

    10. Re:So? by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      True, but Engineering is not the same as IT for example, and should be treated differently. Engineering is a direct cost of producing products, whereas IT is a G&A Expense, kind of like accounting, or building maintenance. The reality is that these days, IT is becoming a commodity.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    11. Re:So? by russotto · · Score: 1

      True, but Engineering is not the same as IT for example, and should be treated differently. Engineering is a direct cost of producing products, whereas IT is a G&A Expense, kind of like accounting, or building maintenance. The reality is that these days, IT is becoming a commodity.

      You're right that they are different; you're wrong in that PHBs often fail to see a distinction, let alone a difference. They're still both "cost centers" to that manner of thinking.

    12. Re:So? by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

      Well, if the people in Sr. Management treat Engineering the same way they treat IT and Accounting, then they need to get hammered in the marketplace, and they eventually will because their products will suffer. The company I worked for had that mentality too. They laid off 20% of the engineers. My boss didn't know which if his people were to be let go until some of us called to say goodbye. Accounting and Legal made the decisions based on expenses and making sure they didn't have any minority or disability issues that would result in the high likelihood a lawsuit. Productivity and experience were not factors.

      --
      I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
    13. Re:So? by armanox · · Score: 1

      I never implied that they weren't deserving of respect - they just don't receive it (and neither do most people in systems/network engineering/administration from what I see either)

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    14. Re:So? by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You say that as if its not the truth ...

      Reality check: We ARE glorified janitors and automobile mechanics.

      Very few in IT are actually worthy of being treated as something special, and regardless of how many people here don't understand it, most slashdotters are not 'special' with their skills today. 10 years ago, slashdot users had automatic street cred, today, its just another haven for wanna-bes with a few geeks still mixed in from the 'good ol days'

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    15. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma,

      For a long time, the IT efficiency and productivity claim were used as reason to right-size other operations.

      Now the same logic will be applied against the field that stack their claim on such basis.

      You may not agree, just like employees of other operations.

    16. Re:So? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never BEEN in the real world, you overpaid spoiled troll (CEO?). Go broke and work for a living before you flame us honest hard working people.

      Been there, done that, you're still a big cry baby. Worse still is that you're retarded and think you are somehow entitled to something you didn't work to obtain.

      You know why you don't make as much as the CEO? Cause you don't deserve it. If you did, you'd have the job and the salary, but you don't. You aren't capable of getting it. Why? Could be any reason, maybe you really aren't that smart. Maybe you don't care enough. Maybe you don't want the life style that goes with it. I don't know the specific reason you don't deserve it, but you don't. You are not entitled to jack shit, you earn what you get, one way or another. I'll never be a CEO because I'm too lazy and too nice, but I'm also not living in some retarded delusion that came about because I was raised by a bunch of sissies who told me I was special and different all my life.

      You can pretend you're special, you can even actually believe your special, but in reality if you were half as special as you think you are, you'd make good money because you'd have those jobs that make good money.

      In reality, you're just a big baby crying about how his/her job is now becoming normal since the ratio of tech jobs to tech employees is equaling out. Companies are realizing that they don't need 20 geeks who do half assed jobs and get paid 60k a year, they only need 5 geeks, who get paid 60k a year, but do a good job and are happy to do so.

      You go ahead, keep whining and talking about how unfair it is, let me know when food stamps pays for your blackberry bill, I'll text you and let you know how nice it is to still have a job.

      Honest hard working people aren't the ones complaining, its the spoiled brats who haven't actually had a job that requires 'real work' that are complaining. Yes, you obviously fit this category.

      So why don't YOU go get a dose of reality. I HAVE busted my ass to go from the poor house to a nice house, I HAVE put in the work and effort. Once you get over being spoiled and get a dose of reality like you claim, I doubt you'll bitch as much.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    17. Re:So? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm not trying to bash you. I'm really just trying to point out that the problem isn't specifically that IT people don't get the respect they deserve. The problem is that most of us don't get the respect we deserve.

    18. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that you aren't nice at all, you are a total self-hating scumbag.

      However, you actually have to like yourself to be a successful CEO, so, yeah, you'd never make it.

      Loser.

      I am impressed by your commitment to failure though, and it won't be long now. Why don't you take up drinking now? It will help when you are unemployed and on the street.

    19. Re:So? by kklein · · Score: 1

      Reality check: We ARE glorified janitors and automobile mechanics.

      Yup. It's not the 70s or 80s anymore. Computer skills are going the same place as TV repair. At one time it was like "Ooo! Techmanology!" but now it's just... TV repair.

    20. Re:So? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm fine with my job, which I'll be retiring from in a few years, so go troll somebody else.

    21. Re:So? by davidluzsi · · Score: 1

      Thats right! Every job is different! I built a website on forex trading. You can review the latest forex robots and forex trading systems. It is a resource for foreign exchange traders and people who want to begin with forex trading. http://www.review-forex-robots.com/

  3. Free coffee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What free coffee?

    1. Re:Free coffee? by poxa · · Score: 1

      I never had free coffee either - I pay for around 4 every day:D. And I definitely look forward to telecommuting and flexible schedules... so bring it on!

  4. I wish they would by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 1

    At the shitehole where I work the free coffee is bloody Nescafe instant.

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
    1. Re:I wish they would by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      Nasty instant Coffee?

      That's nothing. Where I work, we have go outside, and chew the leaves and beans off coffee bushes ourselves.

    2. Re:I wish they would by der_joachim · · Score: 1

      At the shitehole where I work I bought myself a jar of Nescafe instant, because the free coffee is even worse!

      --
      Geek runner, motorcyclist and professional know-it-all
    3. Re:I wish they would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. Where I work, we have go outside, and chew the leaves and beans off coffee bushes ourselves.

      The free coffee at work is so weak I've taken to bringing in my own chocolate-covered coffee beans and just crunching on them. My cow orker in the next cubicle hates me, though. *crunch crunch*.

    4. Re:I wish they would by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Lord...that's beyond vile if it's THAT bad.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    5. Re:I wish they would by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be complaining about the tropical environment, I am in florida right now, the palm trees are encrusted ice, and my Bermuda shorts just are not sufficient.

    6. Re:I wish they would by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nasty instant Coffee?

      That's nothing. Where I work, we have go outside, and chew the leaves and beans off coffee bushes ourselves.

      Lucky sod! Your coffee's fresher than everyone's!

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    7. Re:I wish they would by ByOhTek · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do you have your own person to turn cows into orks in the next cubicle? Is that a big thing where you work?

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    8. Re:I wish they would by paiute · · Score: 1

      Nasty instant Coffee?

      That's nothing. Where I work, we have go outside, and chew the leaves and beans off coffee bushes ourselves.

      Right. I had to get up in the morning at ten o'clock at night half an hour before I went to bed, drink a cup of sulphuric acid, work twenty-nine hours a day down mill, and pay mill owner for permission to come to work, and when we got home, our Dad and our mother would kill us and dance about on our graves singing Hallelujah.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    9. Re:I wish they would by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      What about the half a teaspoon of cold poison for dinner ?

    10. Re:I wish they would by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      Sounds like his company is cross-breeding cows with orks, to create an army worthy of Mordor, but without violating Saruman's Uruk-hai patent.

    11. Re:I wish they would by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      Or maybe an army you can make hamburgers out of later? It would certainly beat having to pay their post-service medical bills.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    12. Re:I wish they would by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      Hahaha that's nothing! Would that we were so fortunate we could chew the leaves and beans of coffee bushes! All we get is a cup of warm spit from some who chewed the leaves and beans off coffee bushes, and we all share a cubicle 26 of us an alf the floor is missing!

    13. Re:I wish they would by jjinco33 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must work here at IBM too

      --
      Meh.
    14. Re:I wish they would by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Lucky bastard. Where I work we have to grow our own bushes.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    15. Re:I wish they would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i loled

    16. Re:I wish they would by jefu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Careful that you don't get the coffee bushes and the coca bushes mixed up.

    17. Re:I wish they would by conureman · · Score: 1

      You try tellin' the kids that nowadays, they won't believe ya'.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    18. Re:I wish they would by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I carry a thermos to work.

    19. Re:I wish they would by oatworm · · Score: 1

      Pfft - please. Where I work, we have to pull our own chicory root, grind it up, and brew it - that's what we call "coffee"! If we want sugar with that, we go out back, pull some sugar beets out of the ground, shred them, boil the shreds, then reduce the resulting liquid to a clear syrup and pour that in our "coffee"! Oh, and we have to do all of this off company time, lest the efficiency director see what we're up to and dock our pay! I haven't slept in months!

      Damn bourgeoisie and their real coffee...

    20. Re:I wish they would by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Might be nice to do so at the end of the day. http://www.cocamuseum.com/htm/chewing.htm

  5. No Coffee = No Code by glaese · · Score: 2

    I know many programmers whose fingers can't move unless well lubricated with caffene :-)

    1. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not being able to function without caffeine is not something to be proud of.

    2. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Alarindris · · Score: 1

      No kidding, it's like bragging about your 5th of scotch a day habit. If you need it to function, you have a problem and should cut back or quit.

    3. Re:No Coffee = No Code by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Well I can't function until my first red bull and vodka, what does that say?

    4. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Alarindris · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're a musician? ;)

    5. Re:No Coffee = No Code by digitig · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you need it to function, you have a problem and should cut back or quit.

      I need oxygen to function, but I'm worried about cutting back or quitting. I'm told the withdrawal symptoms are pretty bad.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    6. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the flipside, caffeine, in moderate doses, enhances mental focus, and for developers, that can be a real boon (I work just fine without caffeine, but if I have to buckle down for an intense coding session, a little caffeine and a pair of isolating headphones is, hands down, the best way for me to get in the flow and stay there for a prolonged period of time).

    7. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Sir are my hero!

    8. Re:No Coffee = No Code by SharpFang · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A cow is a machine that converts grass to milk.
      A programmer is a machine that converts coffee to code.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    9. Re:No Coffee = No Code by M8e · · Score: 1

      You are lucky, I need both Dihydrogen monoxide and oxygen to function. Not to forget L-ascorbic ACID, and all the other crap i need.

    10. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's not stereotype all programmers.

      I hear Mac coders prefer expensive herbal teas.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    11. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac coders are centaurs thats converts plant matter to mac code and horse shit.

    12. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called ADD. Self medicating is fun

    13. Re:No Coffee = No Code by yabos · · Score: 1

      [self drinkTea:YES];

      Let's see how many people get it.

    14. Re:No Coffee = No Code by notarockstar1979 · · Score: 1

      No, a drummer.

    15. Re:No Coffee = No Code by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Oxygen withdrawal isn't really that bad. You feel uncomfortable for a minute or two, but that feeling goes away.

    16. Re:No Coffee = No Code by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      *programmer = [[macCoder alloc] initWithTea:herbal andTurtleneck:YES];

    17. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference? *Hides under desk*

    18. Re:No Coffee = No Code by aonic · · Score: 1

      An engineering grad student is a machine that converts booze into code.

    19. Re:No Coffee = No Code by dem0n1 · · Score: 1

      If I gotta clean up shit, I'd rather clean up horse shit than cow shit.

      --
      Why save your soul when you can sell it for a profit?
    20. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      My preferences are Arabic coffee with cinnamon, peach iced tea, or diet coke. Run, my gophers, run!

    21. Re:No Coffee = No Code by msobkow · · Score: 1

      It's a legal high, so tough shit.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    22. Re:No Coffee = No Code by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      A cow is a machine that converts grass to milk.
      A programmer is a machine that converts coffee to code.

      So I think what you're saying is that on occasion, we should eat programmers...?

      This just keeps getting worse and worse. :(

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    23. Re:No Coffee = No Code by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      Musicians wish they could afford red bull & vodka. One of the most overpriced drinks ever (and most overrated IMO).

    24. Re:No Coffee = No Code by der_joachim · · Score: 1

      So I think what you're saying is that on occasion, we should eat programmers...?

      Only if you like junk food.

      Disclaimer: I am a programmer.

      --
      Geek runner, motorcyclist and professional know-it-all
    25. Re:No Coffee = No Code by dem0n1 · · Score: 1

      A cow is a machine that converts grass to milk. A programmer is a machine that converts coffee to code.

      So I think what you're saying is that on occasion, we should eat programmers...?

      This just keeps getting worse and worse. :(

      Old programmers that can no longer produce enough code are ground up and fed to the young programmers. Or perhaps blended with an instant coffee derivative to make a nice slurry to be drank.

      --
      Why save your soul when you can sell it for a profit?
    26. Re:No Coffee = No Code by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      ObjC message send to self?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  6. As long as they... by sjonke · · Score: 1

    ... don't take away the Hot Coffee, I'm fine with it.

    --
    --- What?
    1. Re:As long as they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they don't take away the hot grits and Natalie Portman, I'm fine with it...

      Oh, wait... :(

  7. Yep.. by Bearded+Frog · · Score: 1

    My company has done all this already except eliminating the free coffee... that will be the last straw. To quote office space "I'll set the building on fire" (not really though)

  8. Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The more you screw your employees, the more they will find ways to screw you. Turn off Gmail and Slashdot? Fine, I'll take a once-an-hour smoke break. Hack my 401k? I'll sit and stare at the ceiling. Bust by balls about travel costs? See if I don't have a "family thing" next time and can't go. People will take what they feel (rightly or wrongly) is their due, whether you give it to them or not.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by unformed · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If the company's only options are laying you off or cutting benefits to save costs, suck it up and be happy you still have a job.

      If you think you can do better, feel free to walk.

    2. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems particularly counterproductive to do so on the really cheap; but warm and fuzzy, nonmonetary perks. In even modest quantities, the unit cost of a cup of mediocre coffee isn't quite zero, but it sure isn't high. Certainly lower than the per-unit cost(either for you or for your employees) of having them nipping out to Starbucks for 15 minutes, rather than the kitchen for 5).

    3. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by arkham6 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please.

      You are at work to work, you are not at work to read slashdot and gmail.

      You have this awful sense of entitlement. Free coffee? Have to justify travel expenses? C'mon the company does not exist to serve you, you exist to work for them and provide value at a minimum of expense.

      The companies responsibility is to its stakeholders to provide maximum profit. Employees are the largest expense a company has, so in lean times like these, they have to cut spending of all expenses to survive.

      So suck it up and be happy you have a job, and not be part of the 10 percent who wish they had one.

    4. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I bet you also think that your employer "pays half" of your Social Security tax. All those things I mentioned, which you classify as perks, are part of the whole package - your salary, your benefits, your coffee, it all equals X dollars per year. If they remove one or more of those, its a pay cut, pure and simple.

      I earn my job, which is why I have one. Do you ?

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    5. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have this awful sense of entitlement. Free coffee? Have to justify travel expenses? C'mon the company does not exist to serve you, you exist to work for them and provide value at a minimum of expense.

      No, we really don't exist to work for companies and provide them with maximum value at minimum expense. Thinking we do... now that's an awful sense of entitlement.

    6. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by assertation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like a great attitude for making yourself unhappy in your job and/or becoming unemployed.

      I agree with you, employers can't enforce the enthusiasm and company loyalty that promotes better productivity, but they can certainly chip away at it by taking away things.

    7. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Another,+completely · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The travel expenses thing has gotten crazy for me. It's like the accountants think the company is doing me a favour letting me go to an exciting foreign hotel, experience the interior of exotic taxis, and meet the charming foreign customs officers. I do not consider it a perk, and being treated as guilty until proven innocent in claiming back the expensive "approved" hotel (instead of a more affordable and convenient one that's not on the list) is just enough to let me accept the less productive option of constant telephone meetings with people whose faces I have never seen.

      That is, I suppose, their goal. Reduced overhead looks good, while lost business and reduced productivity just looks like market forces that are being proactively addressed by more careful attention to reducing expenses. The accountants are taking important action to tighten belts and address the failing ability of the business divisions to deliver top-line growth. The damage they do to the company actually looks like a responsible way to address the business situation. I think they have cause and effect backwards, but it's their decision to make, not mine.

    8. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by arkham6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exist may have been a wrong term. Try "You are at your job to work for them...."

    9. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by system1111 · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if there was sarcasm in this or not. If not makes me sad panda. Seriously its the little things that make people happy and keep them that way. The less happy you make them the less productive they will be. And the easier they will become targets to get sniped by other companies Which do you think costs more in the long run that cup of coffee or the lost productivity/retraining? Ugh don't make me throwup with the stakeholders line. Because praising the almighty stake holders for that short-term near quarter bump has no long term implications Companies have this awful sense of entitlement when it comes to taking advantage of there workers

    10. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Filthy Communist. Doing a half assed job is the American Way.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    11. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a manager that micromanages.

    12. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am at my job to exchange my skills (brain time; me thinking about your problem), for money and benefits.

      I will attempt to do so at the rate the market will bear.

      If the company wants to lowball their skills vendor; the one with whom they've had a long-term positive relationship; the one who has institutional knowledge that helps the vendor understand their unique business needs ... that's up to the company.

      You may find somebody else to put at my desk, but you will *never* be able to replace me. That's why you pay me the big bucks.

    13. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a tool.

    14. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's the situation I'm in right now. Our bonuses have been cut 3 years consecutively now. We've always paid for our own coffee. As for travel, they understand that if they don't pay the costs, we aren't going. Only because it'd be illegal for them to do so.

      Yeah, the biggest part of it is that the company is EXPANDING. We've opened 6 new locations last year. Easy to buy property in these hard times. But they just can't seem to afford bonuses this Christmas.

      But they know that if I were to walk out, it'd be tough to find a job.

    15. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by MadKeithV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the company's only options are laying you off or cutting benefits to save costs, suck it up and be happy you still have a job.

      If you think you can do better, feel free to walk.

      The ones that *will* walk are the ones the company really doesn't want to lose.
      Then again, an organization that thinks eliminating free coffee will be a real benefit to the bottom line would not know better even if they get stuck with all the people that are too rigid, dumb or lazy to find a better job.

      And even then, if it's a large enough organization, with a smart manager, you might see someone shelling out the money for the coffee themselves just to keep the good workers happy. If you want to survive as an IT company, stop treating people as interchangable resources.

    16. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Please.

      You are at work to work, you are not at work to read slashdot and gmail.

      Mr. Pot, allow me to introduce you to Mr. Kettle.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    17. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by joeyspqr · · Score: 1

      thanks for the reminders
      I have to check gmail to see if my last comment was modded up and I was beginning to think that I traded my knowledge and skills for money in a fair exchange, instead of being grateful to my feudal liege for bare sustenance.

      --
      +1 fashionably cynical
    18. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Fine, I'll take a once-an-hour smoke break.

      And the plan here is to... get lung cancer and cost the medical plan a lot of money?

    19. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Afty0r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems particularly counterproductive to do so on the really cheap; but warm and fuzzy, nonmonetary perks.

      Every good manager knows that it is far more effective (from an employee motivation POV) to spend a reasonable amount of money providing small and helpful perks like this, than it would be to take the same amount of money and distribute it among the employees as part of their next raise.

    20. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

      If a company's position is so dire as to need to skimp on the coffee, it'll fall over sooner or later anyway ... better be off then and there.

      --

      ---
      "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    21. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by aes123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hate to break it to you, but employees are one of the stakeholders at a company. Contrary to popular belief, a company's sole responsibility is NOT to its shareholders; a company needs to properly balance its responsibilities to it shareholders, employees, and customers. Employees are not ONLY an expense; very often, they are also the reason that a company has a profit to worry about in the first place. If a company spends .1% of its revenue on employee perks like coffee and it earns them 1% in productivity, that sounds like a fantastic return. Focusing on expenses only is back ass-wards, shortsighted, and often counterproductive.

    22. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Maybe the truth is in between. In most every case, employers and employees have not enumerated a complete and quantified list of services rendered for compensation received, does not entitle either party to more or less. Employees are free to not do things they are not legally bound to do, and employers are free to find labor more willing to do so.

    23. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "Paging Mr Tarkin"?

      Anyways, I'm going to point out that the companies do have to cut something if their revenue is down. Your a manager trying to figure out how to keep things within budget. Your significant expenses are: salaries, benefits, office space, office utilities, raw materials, equipment maintenance, and fringe benefits. Which do you choose?

      Salaries and benefits are probably untouchable unless you lay people off. Being a reasonably benevolent business, you don't want to lay people off, and you're in some cases legally obligated not to reduce salaries or benefits.

      Office space, supplies, and utilities can possibly be reduced, but the short-term expense of doing so makes the prospect daunting at best.

      Raw materials and equipment maintenance might be targetable for a short period of time, but eventually will yurt your product.

      That leaves fringe benefits. So while it's unpleasant, it's less unpleasant than the alternatives. Personally, I don't give a damn about most of these, because they're usually half-assed attempts to convince people to be happy working somewhere even if they're being underpaid.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    24. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That last paragraph sums up exactly what is wrong with a lot of companies these days, what happens when you let the MBAs and the bean counters run the place. Cutting corners like this, but also outsourcing or the practise of firing staff and hiring contractors, sure looks good on the balance sheet... often because the cost is the same or higher but it'll be OpEx instead of CapEx, or comes out of a different budget. The truth is that in many cases these things end up costing the company dearly.

      Remember what they say about accountants: they know the cost of everything, but they don't have a clue about the value.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    25. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you're exactly the kind of person who occasionally loses access to their email for three hours while I take a long lunch and ignore you.

    26. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

      "C'mon the company does not exist to serve you, you exist to work for them and provide value at a minimum of expense."

      Eh no. I most certainly do not exist for a company's sake.

      Also, I consider myself to be a stakeholder in the company I work for too. When being contracted by a company, we enter a mutually beneficial relationship, notice the word mutual. Treat me well as employee and I will treat you well as employer.

      --

      ---
      "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    27. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by jittles · · Score: 1

      Bust by balls about travel costs? See if I don't have a "family thing" next time and can't go.

      I feel you on that one. I once had an employer bust my balls and refuse to pay a $4 expense from jamba juice because the receipt wasn't itemized. My response to them? You can have the $4 but I'll never travel again if that is how it's going to be.

    28. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      You are at work to work, you are not at work to read slashdot and gmail. You have this awful sense of entitlement. Free coffee? Have to justify travel expenses? C'mon the company does not exist to serve you, you exist to work for them and provide value at a minimum of expense. The companies responsibility is to its stakeholders to provide maximum profit. Employees are the largest expense a company has, so in lean times like these, they have to cut spending of all expenses to survive.

      A company that mistakes its employees for machines or robots will suffer productivity losses. We are people, and yes, we develop a sense of entitlement for benefits we take for granted. I've never worked a place with free coffee, so I don't get the big deal. I'd be grateful if the company offered that minor expense. I bring in my own Thermos of coffee every day, and it sets me back 10 minutes in the morning to make it, plus $10/month in beans. It's not a significant investment, compared to even the IT costs for my e-mail alone.

      If you threaten my 401k, I'll go elsewhere. There are other companies in this city, and I don't even like this city. There are still companies preserving 401k matching.

      "Times like these" are largely self-described to several companies. Spending is not down across the board. If you have a significant customer base in Detroit, or if you're in several manufacturing industries, obviously you've been hit. But some of us are doing quite well and getting a little upset that the company is still cutting back and pointing to other unrelated industries as the reason.

    29. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Ultimately, both the employees and the companies they work for are in it for themselves. (If you doubt that, imagine employees working for free, or companies paying employees who don't work). Ignoring either side of the equation is obviously wrong.

    30. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Drethon · · Score: 0

      Nope my job is to produce the largest quantity of high quality code I can every day (software developer). The company should keep their nose out of how I do this as long as it is legal and moral (definition of moral being rather morphable unfortunately).

      If I produce more code by browsing the internet in one corner of my display so I don't brain fizz an hour after I start then they shouldn't block my internet browsing ability. I agree blocking games is probably a good idea but I find myself stairing off into space too much if I'm trying to work every minute, if I browse the internet I can push myself harder and faster for a higher percentage of each hour.

    31. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My last company was "employee owned", which meant the executives had all the stock and were able to give themselves dividends whenever they felt like it.

      In 2007, the company posted a record year, despite being in the newspaper industry. Staffing levels were decreased, no one got raises, but the executives paid themselves nicely.

      In 2008, they practically matched 2007 for profits despite being in the newspaper industry. They started massive layoffs and pay cuts around the board, but the executives matched their 2007 dividends.

      In 2009, I and most of the IT staff finally walked.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    32. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      C'mon the company does not exist to serve you, you exist to work for them and provide value at a minimum of expense.

      THIS is what's wrong with western thought and a 'live for the money' way of life.

      you will find out (sooner or later) that you lived your life ALL WRONG. you have things exactly backwards.

      things exist in this world to make life better for PEOPLE. you know, human beings, NOT corps.

      think about it. don't just parrot back what you heard in your marketing class. this is about people. fail to remember that and you've lost touch with what life is all about.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    33. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The coffee and the cups of soup etc help productivity. The employers that give it get something back. The ones that don't loose.

      And like Vader said. Employees tend to take what they think is due to them. My current employer requires everyone to work from 8:30 to 6:30. People come to work late and take 2 hour lunches.

      They do have coffee and cups of soup available and people sometimes use those to stave off hunger when they are trying to finish something.

    34. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You bring up an interesting question I often ask my friends relating to both politics & business. How should the people in charge behave and treat their employees / citizens?

      1) What they feel is best for the company / country / citizens (may not be what employees, shareholders, or citizens want, but they are elected / promoted to these positions because their judgement is valued).

      2) What the shareholders / citizens want (may not be what is best since they may not know everything available).

      3) What is immediately the best option for the citizens / shareholders (may destroy future worth).

      Basically, who are they responsible to? While a business is owned by the shareholders, is managements responsibility to said shareholders or to the employees they are overseeing? There is no "right" or "wrong" answer to this but the way a person views it gives a lot of insight into how they'll view other things.

    35. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Every good manager knows that it is far more effective (from an employee motivation POV) to spend a reasonable amount of money providing small and helpful perks like this, than it would be to take the same amount of money and distribute it among the executives as part of their next bonus.

      There. Fixed that for you.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    36. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by shrtcircuit · · Score: 1

      The "suck it up and be happy you have a job" was almost the exact phrase our VP issued down a few months ago, along with "if you don't want to be here to make all our dreams come true, go somewhere else". The problem is that our company relies on a fair bit of "rockstar" technology talent to make things happen, and even with so many people unemployed, it's not that easy to find qualified people at that level (there is, however, a metric ton of mediocre talent, and people who think they're way better than they really are out there). So, the rockstars find they can locate other good jobs with some relative ease (being rockstars and all) and take that VP's message to heart.

      Making profit is important, maybe the most important thing to a company. But if you start treating your employees like unwanted burdens and making it feel like a prison instead of a good place to spend 8-10 hours of your day, the ones you want to keep WILL leave simply because they can, and you will be left with the ones you really don't care about because they're too much like all the other "just average" employees out there to find anything else. You won't be able to reliably acquire new rockstars either, because by that point in their career they can smell a shithole a mile away.

      I'm not suggesting every office needs to be an arcade, or that you have to make lavish expenses routinely. But little things like free coffee, bagels once a week, reasonable but not totally locked down Internet policies, etc go a long way. I fully expect that I can hit gmail or slashdot from time to time - I don't spend my whole day on there, but my productivity is worse if I can't break my mind away from other more tedious things. This is pretty normal human behavior. As long as I'm getting my work done and not violating HR use policies (porn, etc), the rest should take care of itself. Employees that can't find that balance will magically disappear at the next round of layoffs anyway.

      Be in business to make money. Don't forget that upper management can't do the job alone, and don't chase away anyone with the innovation and talent to get you there just because you tried to scrape the barrel. Ruthless profiteering may work in the short term, but rarely retains the kind of people you need to have except in a rare few business cases.

    37. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I once worked running the IT dept. for a bank, and seriously, during a high-level meeting including the president, CFO, myself, and a bunch of VPs they sat and laughed while discussing, for 15 minutes, how they found even crappier plastic utensils that were super cheap (I calculated the savings which equaled $7.00 per month). The combined salary in that room for 15 minutes could have bought Oneida silverware for every kitchenette, and it ended with them stating: "haha, they are so weak and flimsy people will just stop using them and bring their own!" and had a good laugh.

      I was probably never so disgusted with human beings as that moment.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    38. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by WinterSolstice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agree with that - when people are pressured to leave, the first ones to go are the ones who can easily find jobs. You know, the best talent.

      The people who can't find jobs stay.

      I'd make a comment about loyalty, but being loyal to a company in this era is like being loyal to an abusive spouse.

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    39. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I earn my job, which is why I have one.

      May you be fortunate enough to never have to reconsider that attitude.

    40. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They'll do it, because they can. When times are tough, companies will squeeze you, even if they don't technically need to. That's because it keeps them 'competitive' which means they can get better profit off 'the market'.
      If you can move on for something better, then do so. If you can't, you get to shut up and take it. It's not very nice, but it's how it is - if you can't do better, then your skills aren't worth as much as you think they are.
      What a lot of companies don't understand though, is that loyalty cuts both ways - it's _VERY_ easy to do a half-assed job in all but the most trivial of situation (e.g. number of labels stuck to number of boxes) and even then it's not exactly hard. You make your employees miserable, and they won't quit, nor will they outright fail to deliver, but standards will drop, because they just don't care enough to do any more than just the minimum to keep their job - no point busting your balls for more pay, if there's no more pay to be had, right?

    41. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by DaFallus · · Score: 2

      Employees are also a company's greatest asset. For some reason most managers and corporate officers forget this. Also, I have never met anyone who works every second of the day while in the office, especially when it comes to upper management. Taking five minutes to check your personal email or scan the headlines on slashdot doesn't really hurt anyone or get in the way of productivity. Taking small, inexpensive perks away from your employees, especially when in the name of cost cutting, does nothing but create resentment and signal to your most valuable talent that its time to start looking for employment elsewhere.

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    42. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      what happens when you let the MBAs and the bean counters run the place.

      Those who forget this lesson, time and time again are forced to relive America's entry into Vietnam. Vietnam is what happens when MBAs and bean counters are empowered to actually run things. In short, its disastrous for everyone involved. They focus on body count and raw hours rather than noteworthy results. Even worse, for absolutely no reason, they believe they know more about a product, task, trade, or skill than the manufacturers and/or tradesmen; just ask Stoner of AmaLite and the notorious M-16 jams or the any number of thousands of dead US military.

      MBAs and accountants only have value when kept in dark rooms with electric shock collars. Any other allowances is likely to lead to results ranging from loss of weekends and vacation, loss of jobs, or people actually dying.

    43. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      No, you're not. You're at work because it's a place you can be productive, and deliver value for your salary. Hours spent with nose pressed to grindstone do NOT correlate directly with productive output - Mr. Ford proved that, when he switched to a 40 hour, 5 day working week.
      The only jobs where time spent is directly proportional to work accomplished are the kind that involves putting stickers on boxes - e.g. not the kind where you have a net link in the first place.

    44. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      I have been working in IT since I was 15 years old, and have never expected anything... even during the big dot com boom. Any bonuses have been appreciated, except in cases where they were part of hire conditions. There are only two things that *I* expect. 1. That I be treated as a professional and part of a team 2. When I have an issue or problem, that it be dealt with with the same care and precision I offer everyone else in my work. A third, I guess, would be that I am given a yearly percentage increase to at the least match inflation.

      Sadly, in my career in IT my very minimum expectations are very often not met. It's not about perks or coffee, it is the view that we are somehow different than accounting, purchasing, or any other department. We aren't. And if we are so different and essential, then those minimum expectations should be even more minor...

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    45. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Sitting and staring at the ceiling is a good way to lose your job altogether, nevermind about the benefits.

    46. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Most people forget that the Corporation only exists because the government allows it to exist. The government ultimately derives it's power from the people. Some of those people are employees, some are shareholders, some are both and most are neither.

      If the government tells a corporation that it has to treat it's employee's a certain way, then it's the People telling people to treat people well.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    47. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the grandparent poster was making a joke, I have a hard time parsing that as anything but sarcasm......

    48. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      The companies responsibility is to its stakeholders to provide maximum profit.

      Which is why my favorite employers have always been privately owned. They are more concerned about keeping things smooth for the long run, rather than panicking at the thought of a poor quarterly report.

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    49. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Surt · · Score: 1

      The very best employees you have, the ones who can easily get another job in any economy are the ones who will leave, unfortunately.

      Which is why most companies secretly have 2 or 3 levels of perks and benefits.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    50. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by smaddox · · Score: 1

      The Bush administration didn't get that memo.

    51. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by WreathOfBarbs · · Score: 1

      I'd make a comment about loyalty, but being loyal to a company in this era is like being loyal to an abusive spouse.

      I wish I could mod you up for this comment alone! You nailed it right there.

    52. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Nope. In as much as the business's job is to maximize profit for shareholders, the employee's job is to do what he has to in order to get paid. Those descriptions don't really cover everything, but if you want to over-simplify...

    53. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by gangien · · Score: 1

      The problem is that our company relies on a fair bit of "rockstar" technology talent to make things happen, and even with so many people unemployed, it's not that easy to find qualified people at that level (there is, however, a metric ton of mediocre talent, and people who think they're way better than they really are out there).

      offtopic, but it seems like about 50% of the jobs out there in the software industry have this idea behind them. that only the best can work there. I personally think it's almost all hogwash and shows the arrogance of a lot of people. Of course, maybe i'm wrong.

    54. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I could mod you up - but I already posted!

      Really wish I could tattoo your post to the faces of CEOs, CTOs, and an endless cast and crew of idiot MBAs.

    55. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by IANAAC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You may find somebody else to put at my desk, but you will *never* be able to replace me. That's why you pay me the big bucks.

      I used to think that way about my kills too. When you grow up, you'll realize that there are indeed people who know as much as (or *gasp* more!) than you do.

      And here's another little tip: they'll do it for cheaper too. That's one of disadvantages of competing globally.

    56. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd say that it's sort of fair to say that employers are free to not-provide free coffee, and if you don't like it you can quit. That goes both ways, though. Employees are free to not go the extra mile, or they're even free to do a half-assed job. If the employers don't like it, they can fire the employees.

      However, none of that tells you how employers and employees should be treating each other. Ideally I think that it should be considered a free and equitable trade of labor for money, and both parties should try to make sure that they other is happy with the trade. That's a best case scenario, though, and it's unlikely to work that way under most circumstances.

    57. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      but you will *never* be able to replace me

      Employees who believe they are irreplaceable are almost always wrong and usually make for the best candidates to be replaced tomorrow.

      Even if it takes two employees at half your salary, you absolutely are replaceable.

    58. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by ktappe · · Score: 1

      If the company's only options are laying you off or cutting benefits to save costs, suck it up and be happy you still have a job.

      The employer is counting on you taking that "be happy you have a job" attitude. As a result, you take it at your own peril.

      Further, it's rare that the company's only options are layoffs or cutting benefits. They want you to think that, but if you saw where all the other money went you'd blow a gasket.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    59. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by conureman · · Score: 1

      All this discussion, and I thought it was common knowledge- how to manipulate good-will, and leverage little investments like free coffee, into employee loyalty and acceptance of (laughably) lower wages. I guess not everyone follows the same model, but I've always seen it working quite well. I do like my coffee!

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    60. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by shentino · · Score: 1

      Competitive pressures and greedy creditors the unmerciful way they are, a company has no choice but to keep costs under control. If the place goes bankrupt, the payroll goes poof.

      That is no excuse, however, to not be nice when it's affordable.

      Taking coffee away is a cost saver and can easily be justified. And if the company is honest about the costs, and can actually justify it, it should do so. Perhaps a memo to the staff about the coffee costs, and advanced notice that it will be terminated.

      Soliciting suggestions also softens the blow, as it demonstrates reluctance, and if your worker bees know you're not out to screw them, they won't be upset with you as badly.

    61. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by shentino · · Score: 1

      Your statement would make more sense if the fat-cats at the top of the food chain were suffering like the rest of us, but instead are living a luxurious life while the people on whose backs their lifestyle rest are barely able to survive.

      Who has the sense of entitlement here again?

    62. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same story where I work as well. Also in the newspaper industry.

    63. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by shentino · · Score: 1

      In other words, while wages are an expense, employees themselves are an asset.

      Maybe they should be accounted for as such.

    64. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very true indeed! I'll take my free sodas all day long over a $3/day pay hike anytime!

    65. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Gannett LOL!
      You should check out the history on them. I worked for them for 10 years, when the bottom dropped out, they started laying off like crazy, but the executives still got their bonuses, Hell One of them even went to the Bob Hope golf tournament on Gannet's dime right after announcing a huge layoff last year. The backlash was so severe, and they tried to cover it up with a bogus check that he supposedly reimbursed the company with. When that didn't work their PR machine started the whole "It's imperative for drumming up business" routine. I walked as soon as I found another decent job. It took a while, but if you persevere, and your worth having as an IT person, you will succeed. I just feel bad for my Buddies still stuck there. They started more huge projects, with less people and still are forcing unpaid furloughs. What a load of crap! Glad I'm gone.

    66. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1

      Indeed, especially considering that the real cost of those items would be insulting as a raise in pay.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    67. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by yabos · · Score: 1

      Can't view 'cause youtube is blocked

    68. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      But they just can't seem to afford bonuses this Christmas.

      But they know that if I were to walk out, it'd be tough to find a job.

      Not really. It depends on where you live. If you live in Orlando, I know from experience that you'll be hosed if you leave. And management knows it. But in Chicago, things are very different. During the .com crash, I took a 66% pay cut. People I know were out of work for months. This time it's nothing like that. Everyone I know in IT is employed and doing fine. Rates are a little down, but nothing like 2000-2002. There's plenty of work out there. You just have to be marketable.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    69. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      number one reason I stay where I am is the 401k.
      They don't match, rather they throw a chunk of money in for you even if you don't put in anything. That chunk is variable, based on the companies profits. Back in 96-99 it was almost 11% of your nominal pay, currently it's about 5% which is still damn good.

      Add to that the 7% I throw in and I'll be fine when it's time to retire.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    70. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, trying to get you to do the job you are paid to do is 'screwing you'~.. idiot.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    71. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by geekoid · · Score: 1

      This coming from someone who will refuse to do work when there employer cots /. or gmail? hypocrite.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    72. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to break it to you, but employees are one of the stakeholders at a company. Contrary to popular belief, a company's sole responsibility is NOT to its shareholders; a company needs to properly balance its responsibilities to it shareholders, employees, and customers.

      Employees are not ONLY an expense; very often, they are also the reason that a company has a profit to worry about in the first place. If a company spends .1% of its revenue on employee perks like coffee and it earns them 1% in productivity, that sounds like a fantastic return.

      Focusing on expenses only is back ass-wards, shortsighted, and often counterproductive.

      My, what a delighfully archaic conceit.

      Don't you remember "Our Employees are our Greatest Asset?". We just like to periodically liquidate assets. Besides, we all know employees have no loyalty these days. Ever since we told them "We don't owe you a job" and made them perma-temps, then outsourced the temp work to India and China.

    73. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      The same logic that goes into motivating customers to buy your product and not the 20 others that seem exactly like it, goes into motivating employees.

      20 companies may offer the same explicit benefits, but you want yours to feel like it offers more. Not because you care about your employee welfare, but because you want the most out of them and you aren't smart enough to specify in detail how you'd like the job done in every circumstance.

      I think the industries we're producing that are so dependent on the absence of competition is (as predicted) making business stupid. They no longer need to please customers and don't know how, or why they'd want to. Similarly, they don't know why they'd want to please employees and don't know how.

    74. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can only assume, if they were really such awful human beings, that their real motivation was to ensure that none of the provided cutlery was sharp or stiff enough to stab them to death with.

    75. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well I often think it's not possible to specify in detail how you'd like the job done in every circumstance. It's especially in the case of specialized fields like IT. Many employers don't know what they want the IT department to do because they don't know what IT departments do. There lack of understanding of IT is exactly why they've hired an IT staff.

      I think the industries we're producing that are so dependent on the absence of competition is (as predicted) making business stupid.

      I don't think it's just a lack of competition. I think a big part of it is a natural psychological factor that we tend to ignore. Have you ever read about the Stanford prison experiment? It was a powerful example of how human behavior can change drastically depending on context, and it demonstrated that otherwise decent people can become abusive of others if you place them in a context which encourages such abuse. Well... these psychological effects don't just happen in prisons. I believe that something similar happens often between bosses and underlings, between businesses and customers, and between the rich and the poor.

      I think a subtle but meaningful change must have happened whenever we stopped talking about "customers" and started talking about "consumers". The label "consumer" implies someone whose job it is to consume whatever producers provide them with, rather than thinking of people as independent decision-makers.

      I'm straying a little off the topic, but this sort of subtle change in mindset can also greatly affect the employer/employee relationship. Contrary to what some people will tell you, employees are often not working to get the most money possible from their companies with the least amount of effort. Very often, given the right circumstances, people will take pride in their work and want to do a good job regardless of financial incentives. They may even work extra-hard in order to impress and please their boss, not just because they hope for raises or promotions, but simply because their boss is the person evaluating their work. A desire to impress and please other people is inborn into people, and they particularly like to please authority figures.

      Often, companies take advantage of this asymmetrical relationship, and executives begin thinking of their employees as lesser beings who leach from the company and don't really deserve to be treated very well. This is also a instinctual social dynamic. They begin to abuse their employees similarly (though to a lesser degree) to the way the prison guards abused their inmates in the experiment.

    76. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I've never worked a place with free coffee, so I don't get the big deal.

      It's not a big deal, but if your company systematically cutting back on all the little perks, then morale is going to take a hit.

      But also, cutting back on coffee is probably just a dumb move. Lots of companies offer free coffee, but it's not even just to be nice to employees. They're basically feeding their employees a stimulant, which is commonly thought to make the workers more productive. Plus, if you don't keep a public pot of coffee, that means everyone has to make their own coffee or else go out for coffee-- either of which will take up more money in employee man-hours than the cost of coffee.

    77. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Right, because (sorry all you Capitalists out there) people aren't simply motivated by money. People need money. They need enough money to get by, even though the definition of "enough" varies from person to person. Beyond that, they're motivated by things like the desire for respect or the desire to have their day be more pleasant. Money may be the way they hope to find respect or to make their day more pleasant, but it's not really the money they're after.

      If you want people to work harder, it's often better to make them feel more appreciated than it is to simply give them a raise. If you want people to be more productive, it's often better to make them happy than to make them fearful.

    78. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even: you are at your job because our society expects you to contribute labour in return for a share of the resources available.

      That doesn't mean the employer/employee set of obligations is one-way. It's a balance, and believing that employees owe everything and employers own nothing is at best unhealthy.

      Companies are an abstract concept created by people to serve people. If they're not serving people they're doing it wrong.

      Personally, I exist to do whatever I want. I choose to work to pay my bills and so I have money to buy things I want, but I work solely on my terms. I'll work hard and do my best, but in return I require respectful treatment and a good salary. If my manager was replaced by one who felt I was *obliged* to do various things for his benefit and at my own expense, I'd leave.

    79. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      C'mon the company does not exist to serve you, you exist to work for them

      I don't exist to work, I work to exist.

    80. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm not at my job to work for my employer, I am at my job to earn a paycheck. It's a fair trade; they get value for my being there, and so do I. And they need me a lot more than I need them; if I had to I could grow a garden and live (poorly) off of it, but without employees the company could not exist.

      It seems the employers are the ones with a sense of entitlement, not the workers. My employer's wealth does not trickle down to me, I create his wealth for him to aggregate and control.

    81. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by FileNotFound · · Score: 1

      What really gets to me is when the expense report has to go through 4-5 layers of approval meaning it can take more than a month to get your money back. I don't get it. I have absurdly simple expense reports, car miles/flight, hotel accommodation, parking and per diem.

      Here is a perfect example, I was gone from mid Sept to late Oct, so over a month of travel. Then in early Nov I left again for 2 more weeks.

      I was only able to finally get reimbursed for my Sept-Oct travel AFTER I came back from the travel in Nov, 7 weeks later. In short I have to keep at least 3-5k in a checking account to cover the credit cards when they come due since it's not likely that the company will pay up in time.

      Worse yet, I have to use the company AMEX card. I do not get any rewards from it. They do. Yet if they are late with the expense report, guess who is considered responsible for the bill being paid on time? Yeah...me.

      Oh forget asking for an advance for all the per diem for a long trip. "We just don't do that." I can't wait for my Japan trip with the per diem being over $100. Yeah...I'm saving money for that one already.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    82. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      It may have been here that I read the following quote, but I found it so good that I kept it. Sorry I don't know how to space this out over seperate lines. "I may be branded a traitor to "working men" everywhere but I believe this: I have a job because my company was successful enough to hire me. It is my job to bust my ass to make the company even more successful. I need my company more than my company needs me. If my company can find someone who can do my job better for less money, they are obligated to do so. It is my job to ensure that my contribution to the company assures my continued employment. My company and I are both playing for the same team."

    83. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by tendrousbeastie · · Score: 1

      This is why standard economics suggests, and most companies will try to, when faced with issues that are best solved by labour cost reductions, make layoffs rather than reduce employees compensation.

      If you make layoffs you can choose the least productive or effective employees and get rid of them.

      If you reduce compensation (wages and perks) then the most able and qualified will likely just leave (as they are most able to find better paying work elsewhere) and the rest will be less motivated as described above.

      It is logic that rarely gets considered when papers report on companies slashing jobs.

    84. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a specified period of time with specific compensations, part of which are now being cut. I am still a valuable human being. You are still a valuable human being. The idea that someone would choose to do the same work for less is foolish of them and the primary fault of capitalism - it encourages the most efficiency for the employer at the highest cost to the worker.

    85. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, it seemed to me that it'd be more annoying to work for Clint than Chad...

    86. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by wurble · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair to Eugene Stoner, the infamous M16 jams turned out to be a problem with the ammo being too hot (i.e. too much powder charge), and not with the rifle itself. Despite this, AR made changes to the M16 to be able to hander much hotter loads.

    87. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by swb311 · · Score: 1

      Fine, I'll take a once-an-hour smoke break.

      Am I the only person that read this as an "ounce-an-hour" smoke break?

    88. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      "Chainsaw" Al Dunlap was a beloved corporate shark, whose particular genius was that he was a completely ruthless, amoral sociopath. When he would take control of a company, he would cut, and cut, and cut some more. Cut to the bone, and then get out the bone-saw.

      Needless to say, if he timed it right (and many times he did) he could make a company with a lot of brand goodwill look like a fantastic buy. Then the people who bought the company would find out it was like that time Mr. Burns sold his plant to the Germans, where it was too expensive to bring the plant back up to code to make it profitable.

      However, he made a fortune at this for a while, before he rooked a few to many people and they realized what was going on.

      The moral of this story is, never assume that the bean counters know what they are doing. (They may, but if you have questions to raise, it might be a good idea to raise them.)

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    89. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Fine, you're fired.

      See, it really doesn't cause the problem you seem to think it does.

      One thing I've learned is no one really has a problem firing arrogant pricks, regardless of how much you think you are required, you can and will be replaced, its just a question of when.

      I love when people talk shit like this and knowing full well that if you actually had the balls to do it, you'd simply be posting to slashdot more often about how bad the economy is.

      Your computer courage is staggering, but in no way impressive to anyone, especially your employer.

      Again I say, you do that, exactly like you said, come back and tell us how it works out.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    90. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Heres a question, what did you do, above and beyond your standard job description that warrants your bonus?

      Did you actually do something special? Do you understand the meaning of 'bonus'? Do you realize that that new real estate likely will pay for its self within a very short period of time, and then return money to the company? Its an investment, your bonus is to pay you for the extra investment you made to the company.

      What did you do that makes it so you deserve a bonus, what outside of your job responsibility did you do?

      Just 'doing your job' is not justification for a bonus.

      Did you work massive amounts of extra hours? Did you come up with something new that saved or made the company lots of money?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    91. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a job to work, but I also have a life to live. If my employer is going to fuck my life over by sending me away from my home city, they can fucking well pay for my travel expenses to keep me in a manner to which I am accustomed.

    92. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      I think you need to learn what the word entitlement means.

      You are partially correct, you don't exist to work for companies. You are more than welcome to farm your own land, raise your own animals and eek out a survival some other way.

      Reality on the other hand says that if you're being such a whiney bitch about your desk job that one day of having to do real work would probably result in your death due to an acute case of 'sudden on set reality'.

      So your choice is to go sit at a comfy desk job and pay for your own coffee, or ... go get a job that requires real work and get fired the first day because you are utterly incapable of doing real work because you spend all your time whining about how its 'hard' and 'unfair'.

      You don't exist to serve companies, companies don't exist to serve you, yet you seem to think so. Theres a good portion of the population that would be more than happy to take your job and not bitch about it, you might want to consider that before you bitch and moan too much.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    93. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Please show me a scientific study that can actually PROVE beyond a doubt that buying coffee for employees results in more output or better output or some sort of increased profitability in any way.

      Sadly, this isn't the first time employees have 'lost perks' and it won't be the last and no one will go out of business because they took away the coffee, hell they'll probably be better off since it cuts down on the ridiculous amount of water cooler/coffee machine chitchat about nothing related to your actual job.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    94. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      thats a private company not a coop

    95. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Heres a question, what did you do, above and beyond your standard job description that warrants your bonus?

      Did you actually do something special? Do you understand the meaning of 'bonus'? Do you realize that that new real estate likely will pay for its self within a very short period of time, and then return money to the company? Its an investment, your bonus is to pay you for the extra investment you made to the company.

      What did you do that makes it so you deserve a bonus, what outside of your job responsibility did you do?

      Just 'doing your job' is not justification for a bonus.

      Did you work massive amounts of extra hours? Did you come up with something new that saved or made the company lots of money? What makes you or what you've done special enough to justify getting more than you agreed to be compensated in the first place?

      The entire company should never get bonuses. Select individuals which are role models for others get bonuses. If everyone gets bonuses then its just salary and not a bonus. Bonuses based on things like 'items sold' or 'profit margin' or other things like that are simply commissions even if someone calls them a bonus.

      They know, if you walk out, it'd be hard for you to find another job because you are not particularly special and are easy to replace.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    96. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Well to be fair to Eugene Stoner, the infamous M16 jams turned out to be a problem with the ammo being too hot

      That's exactly my point. The weapon+ammo issued was not what Eugene tested nor was it what had previously been placed into the field. Nor was the weapon what the various armed services stated they required prior to full scale deployment.

      In addition to the ammo being too hot, it was also far, far too dirty; creating the most significant factor (combined with the heat) to weapon jamming. Had components been chromed, despite the untested ammo, it would have likely would have still resulted in an operational weapon.

      And contrary to how it was issued, the weapon was intended to be issued with a companion cleaning kit. And the weapon was to have some components chromed (per Eugene) and a forward assist was required by the armed services. In stead, the know it alls running the war decided that they'd issue the weapon with known to be incorrect and untested ammunition, they failed to provide a forward assist, did not provide a clean kit, and no chrome was added.

    97. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Just 'doing your job' is not justification for a bonus.

      Did you work massive amounts of extra hours? Did you come up with something new that saved or made the company lots of money?

      Yes I have worked many extra hours. The definition of IT basically IS Extra hours. Server needs a reboot, called in over weekends, long trips out of town to set up the new locations. All these done outside of company paid hours. No over-time. Salary based.

      I've also set up a web app to track our IT inventory, when we order new printer toners/inks, new desktops, monitors, keyboards, mice. A nice logging system to keep track of everything we have that comes in and goes out so that we know who got what recently.

      None of this stuff is in the job description, that of a "Help Desk" Technician. I get IT requests, I do them. Thats what earns my salary.

      Everything else is the stuff thats meant to earn perks - which IT is getting fewer and fewer of.

    98. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      And 3 days later, they hired a firm in India to replace you at a 1/3rd the cost, its awesome you showed them!

      If you aren't worth what you were getting paid or they can do it cheaper, they will, and THAT IS WHY THEY KEEP GETTING THE PAYCHECKS.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    99. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by piltdownman84 · · Score: 1

      Same at my work, except the exciting foreign places are places like Edmonton Alberta in the winter. And normally the 'perk' is having to leave town for an undetermined amount of time with a couple hours notice.

      The thing that always gets me in trouble is getting a town car from the airport. I only do it when I know its cheaper than a taxi, but the accountants are always creating a fuss about it. Even when I submit a bill for both, and and the towncar is cheaper than the taxi back to the airport.

    100. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      As a general rule, the ones who are good don't get the same sort of 'pressure' as the ones who aren't.

      Sometimes it happens that way when things are done without any rhyme or reason, but most of the time the people who get 'cut' are the ones who they don't want.

      I've been through probably 5 rounds of layoffs and several paycuts in the last 10 years. My pay cuts were always tiny compared to most others, I stayed, and the chaff left and EVERYONE was better off because of it.

      The people who say what you are saying, are, 99 times out of 100, the ones that aren't really that impressive and they don't really care how quickly you leave.

      For many companies this is SOP, Nortel for instance is notorious for doing it. They'll hire 1000 people and then lay off or pay cut 950 who they don't really want because they aren't at all impressive.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    101. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      The problem with IT is that you don't get to sell items, you don't have a profit margin. IT is an expense. They will only ever show up as a negative number on the books.

      How, exactly, does an IT Pro prove they are doing an excellent job? No one else understands the concepts behind it.

      I could be doing the job of 4 people - but they wouldn't know it. They have trouble even SEEING the difference.

    102. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I left for a company that almost doubled my salary immediately. I doubt think they couple replace me at 1/3 the cost.

      I was solely responsible for their primary production center. They decided not to replace me at all because suits said they would continue not to replace any employee who left until it really bit them in the butt.

      The company in question is the Omaha World-Herald which has won awards for being the most automated and technologically advanced newspaper facility in the world (at least when it opened in 2001). Those complex integrated automation systems literally have zero support today.

      Part of me wishes I could see the next major outage when there is no IT presence. The company hasn't failed to put out a paper in around 120 years. But literally, with no one to keep all their automation systems running, it will happen now.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    103. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Whoa, whoa, there seems to be a lot of misplaced anger in your post. Now I think you should settle down and apologize, but either way I'm not going to take too much offense.

      I'm more than "partially correct". I'm free to work my own land? Well sure I am. Or I'm free to work for other companies who pay me some respect, and I'm also free to start my own company. I'm also free to join a commune or work for the government. We all really have a lot of options, but so what?

      In a certain sense, it's true that my company owes me nothing. In exactly the same sense, it's true that I owe my company nothing. We don't exist specifically to serve each other, but we do serve each other, since we've worked out this mutually beneficial system where we both benefit from mutual service. If my company did not serve me, then why on earth would I show up to work?

      So yes, from my side of the relationship, the relationship exists for my company to serve my needs. Do you really think that there's something wrong with seeing things that way? What, do you think I should be working for free at a job where I get treated badly? No company is entitled to my work, because they're not why I exist. They earn my work by paying me respect, paying me money, and yes, perhaps by paying me coffee.

    104. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Shoot I don't know if the contracting company I work for has ever given out bonuses. I know that last year our annual cost of living raise was a joke. In fact we were told we were lucky to get one at all. The only reason we did is because our division is government contracts. When congress passes the annual pay increase for the DoD the DoD then passes on some of that by automatically increasing the contract with the company I work for by that same percentage. This last year it was 2.9%, it's public record, so when they finally told us half way through the year that our raises were less than half of that it's a might bit insulting. So in the end I got a raise of less than a single percent in reality for that year. When I know for a fact they received 2.9% more for the contract for the entire year, not just the half of the year that I did.

      I understand that there is overhead for an employer involved in having each employee. The ratio can vary widely from 40% of an individuals salary to over 100% in some cases. But some of the factors that contribute largely to that don't apply to my employer. For instance I work at a government facility using government equipment. All my employer really has to do is handle my payroll, time keeping, and health benefits. I know what the contract slot I fill costs the government every year and I know that I get less than 40% of it. And they can't afford to give us raises comensurate with what they received for the contract? Not to mention they don't bother sponsoring any kind of holiday parties or anything.

    105. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody can be replaced. But at what cost?

      What People Cost

    106. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      No, you're right to a point. Rockstar talent isn't exactly required for most places, provided that the software isn't the strategic asset the company relies on (for instance, trading firms). What is required (and is often ignored) is an environment that encourages good practices and long term thinking. The flip side is that, once you have that environment, the rock stars can really help you out making the things you build easy to maintain and extend.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    107. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      What I had heard about newspapers was that the current crop of people running most of the big ones came up during the salad days of double digit profits, so they expect the same profit now. No papers are currently unprofitable, but the scuttlebutt is that repeated layoffs in search of absurd returns is what will finally kill at least a few papers.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    108. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      You'd thinks so, but after many years in the workforce, it seems "I am at work to play office politics, and hopefully get some work done. Hopefully."

      Seriously, I'd love to focus on work, but I'd better do the things I get rewarded for and that usually means politically important but otherwise worthless activities get priority. Heck, I've had my manager specifically tell me this, "I know this is garbage, but the higher ups want it so make it a priority." I get rewarded for successfully navigating office politics, I do actual work because otherwise I'm afraid the company will go under and I'll lose my job. However, I know there are always people around who spend all their work day working at politics and none working at work. Especially if they figure they can find another job pretty easily if the company tanks.

      When you get some perk cut, it usually isn't just to save money. It's usually a petty way to show that you were on the losing end of someone else's political strategy, and you'd better figure out a way to reverse the situation (or get your enemies' perks cut) or things will only escalate. Seriously, when someone does something this petty and trivial it is always part of some strategy. Ignore it at your peril.

      The travel costs thing is especially egregious, as it is a stealth pay cut and that is what it is intended to be. If they get away with that, expect somewhere down the line to be asked to take 10% or more decrease in salary, for the good of the department.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    109. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by RubberChainsaw · · Score: 3, Funny

      You may find somebody else to put at my desk, but you will *never* be able to replace me. That's why you pay me the big bucks.

      I used to think that way about my kills too. When you grow up, you'll realize that there are indeed people who know as much as (or *gasp* more!) than you do.

      And here's another little tip: they'll do it for cheaper too. That's one of disadvantages of competing globally.

      Is the global assassin's market really that cutthroat?

      --
      I welcome our new 99% overlords.
    110. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      My last company was "employee owned", which meant the executives had all the stock and were able to give themselves dividends whenever they felt like it.

      That is not what "employee owned" means.

    111. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Sorry I don't know how to space this out over seperate lines.

      What?

      Hmm... I think I've figured out why you need your company more than your company needs you.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    112. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      I've said before that I don't work in IT. I work in logistics. I find this site interesting. Now, you could have been nice, and told me how to do it, but it's cool, I only talk on here when I have something useful and relevent to say, which isn't often, because once again, I don't work in IT. Cheers.

    113. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh-oh, the men with the butterfly nets need to come pick you up, since you seem to think your are the boss of every random Slashdot poster that you don't like, or else Donald Trump.

    114. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      I am only nice to nice people.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    115. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      With all due respect, where was I not nice? Honestly, I always try to keep my posts short, and I apologise for not using line spacings, while trying to stick to the point. I'll even go so far as apologise to anyone reading this for it being off-topic. Sorry.

    116. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Please re-read your quote. Incidentally, in order to put a quote in a post, please use:

        <blockquote> Text of the quote </blockquote>

      For example:

      <blockquote> "I may be branded a traitor to "working men" everywhere but I believe this: I have a job because my company was successful enough to hire me. It is my job to bust my ass to make the company even more successful. I need my company more than my company needs me. If my company can find someone who can do my job better for less money, they are obligated to do so. It is my job to ensure that my contribution to the company assures my continued employment. My company and I are both playing for the same team." </blockquote>

      And it will look like this:

      "I may be branded a traitor to "working men" everywhere but I believe this: I have a job because my company was successful enough to hire me. It is my job to bust my ass to make the company even more successful. I need my company more than my company needs me. If my company can find someone who can do my job better for less money, they are obligated to do so. It is my job to ensure that my contribution to the company assures my continued employment. My company and I are both playing for the same team."

      By the way, it's is very important to note that I am not being nice by telling you this. However, in future if you choose to quote flamebait, you will at least be able to properly format it.

      Here's a quote you may like:

      `At this festive season of the year, Mr. Scrooge,' said the gentleman, taking up a pen, `it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the Poor and Destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time. Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir.'

      `Are there no prisons?' asked Scrooge.

      `Plenty of prisons,' said the gentleman, laying down the pen again.

      `And the Union workhouses?' demanded Scrooge. `Are they still in operation?'

      `They are. Still,' returned the gentleman, `I wish I could say they were not.'

      `The Treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?' said Scrooge.

      `Both very busy, sir.'

      `Oh! I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful course,' said Scrooge. `I'm very glad to hear it.'

      -- Charles Dickens, A Christmas Carol, Stave One, http://www.online-literature.com/dickens/christmascarol/1/

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    117. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information. Sorry if you took the quote as flamebait, it's something I personally believe in, and forces me daily to consider my position in life. For me, if I was underperforming and was subsequently made redundant it is something I accept, and it would be difficult for me to gain employment and maintain a meaningful career, therefore I strive everyday to ensure my continued employment. Sorry again for the tangent, and unintended flamebait, and thanks for the help. Cheers.

    118. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      You know....a company can have completely legitimate reasons for turning off your GMAIL/Slashdot or busting your balls about travel costs. I've seen people soaking up a paycheck while browsing the web for six hours a day. I've seen people go on the road and rent a fucking Corvette convertible when sent out of town to do some work. One person sees another doing it...they start doing it. Finally a company has had enough and say "To heck with it, no more Internet Access, no more abuse." and "We're going to look at these ridiculous travel costs."

      Sure, a lot of the time a corporation goes out of their way to screw employees but conversely a lot of the time employees will try to screw Employees. Which reminds me.... The company I work for had the attitude that if an employee needed a short cigarette break to calm down and clear their head, they can take it. You just had to go outside and deposit your cigarette stub in one of the plentiful "butt-boxes".

      As time passed there were people going out and throwing their butts on the ground. It was an absolute disaster area. We were warned several times until they said "Screw it, you have to go to one of two designated locations to localize the mess." Of course, this made it easier to see who went out and how often. We had guys going out every 30-45 minutes. The company said the breaks were excessive and would have to ban smoking on the property if people kept at it, which of course they did. Luckily, the company was kind enough to not ban it and just have one designated smoking area and designated break times at 10 AM, during lunch, and 2 PM. Now, a handful of people are still abusing that system. I'm going to be really pissed when they have no choice but to ban smoking anywhere on company property because people feel entitled to their "once-an-hour" break.

    119. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The companies responsibility is to its stakeholders to provide maximum profit. Employees are the largest expense a company has,

      They are also the largest Asset the company has. It pays out in the long run to take care of your assets.

      So suck it up and be happy you have a job, and not be part of the 10 percent who wish they had one.

      And the boss can suck it up and be happy he has competent employees, or join the 80% who wish they did have some.

    120. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, last few should be "Corporation" not "Company".

      OTOH, productivity caused by coffee is difficult to measure. Cost savings are easy to measure.

    121. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Here's my take on gmail at the office :
      I don't do personal email from work, as a rule. Pretty simple rule to live by, and I an pretty strict about it. But every once in a while I've got some personal business to attend to, and it's happening in gmail. At 5pm I have two choices : I can pack up after a 9 hour day and go home, do my personal gmail business and then be a regular person the rest of the day, or I can take about 5 minutes to handle my personal biz from my office computer and if that's all it takes, get right back to work and possibly stay there working a few more hours since I have already dealt with whatever it was (personal) that needed my attention.

      Strange enough, when my Project Manager sees me in gmail (rarely, but it happens) he doesn't seem to be bothered about it.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    122. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Philip_the_physicist · · Score: 1

      He did say that every good manager knows this, not that such creatures exist, or that if they do, they are going to do anyting about it.

    123. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, instead of firing the worst, by reducing the benefits they will lose the best of their guys.
      But in terms of body count, yeah, mission accomplished.

    124. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      As much as I love the inherent vitriol of your comment, no - I've not yet been subject to a pay cut or laid off. I have been at shops that did mass closures (entire IT, whole company out of business, etc) but I've so far managed to elude the axe.

      Typically, when management announces huge layoffs, I send my resume out and take an offer for the same pay or better.

      I'm glad you have made it so long at your job, and had tiny pay cuts. I hope that means you aren't one of the people who can't find work :)

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    125. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      I blame my EeePC keyboard :-)

    126. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I'm starting to feel like this is an act.

      "Made redundant" is a euphemism for a euphemism. Like the euphemism it replaces at the previous stop on the euphemism treadmill, "made redundant" means "fired through no fault of your own."

      Since "made redundant" specifically refers to something that's no fault of your own, but rather a calculated business decision that happens to cost you your position. If you've actually been "made redundant" then they are specifically saying you weren't fired for doing your job poorly, or for not doing it excellently, or for any reason that you could've avoided being made redundant. It's like if you were a genius painter who could render the human face in perfect lifelike detail and then the camera is invented. Suddenly, you've been replaced by a machine and there was nothing you could do.

      So, thoughts of being "made redundant" should prove to even the most naive that the only way to approach a job is through enlightened, mercenary self-interest.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    127. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll lay it out there. I'm a 21 year old chick, with very little world experiance, and I used the wrong word. I don't have the time/energy/desire to continue this, but thanks for misunderstanding and overanalyzing the majority of what I say, because you believe that what I believe is flamebait. Cheers mate.

    128. Re:Paging Mr. Vader - something slipping through by Apocros · · Score: 1

      Supposedly, at my office (roughly 250-300 people, I think), the company spends over $15k a month on coffee. I can't tell if that means those keurig cups are really expensive, people drink tons of coffee, or if the bean counters are full of it.

      --
      "onward!" cried the copper man, little knowing brass corrupts...
  9. I can still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...read your email.

  10. You kill the Joe... by Commander+South · · Score: 2, Funny

    You make some mo'

    1. Re:You kill the Joe... by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points....

    2. Re:You kill the Joe... by archangel9 · · Score: 1

      You kill the Joe...You make some mo'

      someone kill this phrase. As soon as the MBA CFO types see it, I see them humming it mantra-style whilst cross-legged floating above their polished mahogany desks.

  11. Lower 401k = Lower Pay by beckje01 · · Score: 1

    In my mind at least if the company reduces there contributions to the 401k I would see it as a pay cut. While it would be small I would still take it that way.

  12. Hacking off your nose to spite your face by Zey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anywhere that would cut out coffee from the budget is quite frankly insane. It's a minuscule expense compared to the HR budget and improves productivity dramatically when people would otherwise be flagging (early mornings for night owls, afternoons for early birds).

    The ability to provide free, legal performance enhancing drugs is one of the few negligible-cost productivity boost techniques available. You'd have to be both petty and highly incompetent as a manager to do away with it.

    1. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing when I read the summary. There is a reason companies provide a stimulant drug to their employees for free.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    2. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      It's *always* harder to take something away that you used to give people than it is to lay out the ground rules from day 1, explaining it's not a "freebie".

      Where I work, they've had a policy as long as anyone here can remember where coffee isn't free. Rather, the company supplies it, but expects all the coffee-drinkers to contribute a monthly fee towards it. If you don't contribute to the "coffee fund", you're banned from the coffee maker.

      Personally, I thought it was rather petty and senseless -- but I simply shrugged and said "Ok... whatever." and didn't ever drink the company coffee. I just bring in my own (which is better stuff anyway), when I feel like it.

      I guess management thinks they scored another small "cost savings" by running things this way ... and perhaps they did. All I know is, people are odd about things like this. If we used to give it away free and someone changed the policy to the current one, you'd hear all sorts of complaining and moaning. But as it is, everyone seems to be fine with the status quo. Go figure.

    3. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WorldCom dropped free coffee years ago. When John Sidgemore brought back free coffee when he took over from Bernie. Once we went to Verizon they dropped the free coffee again and replaced it with pay-per-cup machines. It sucked.

    4. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      True, but companies don't always (or even often) act rationally in the "big picture". When the HR director cuts the coffee, (s)he gets to point to the savings at the end of the year and justify a bigger bonus. There's no penalty for any productivity lost due to that decision, because this is either invisible at the corporate level or is someone else's (e.g., the IT director, project managers) problem.

    5. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by schnablebg · · Score: 1

      Definitely. My old company laid off 80+% of it's IT staff and as a consolation, installed a soda machine for the remaining employees (they already had coffee).

    6. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be both petty and highly incompetent as a manager to do away with it.

      Explains the last company I worked for....

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    7. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. It's all about arbitrage. In a large corporation you have resources that come from your budget, and resources that come from someone else's budget or a common pool.

      The corporate game is trading resources with other managers so that you come out on top. Spend other people's resources freely, and your own resources sparingly to get your goals met. Your VP is doing the same thing with the other VPs.
      The guy at the top is the only one looking out for the interests of the corporation as a whole, but in most publicly traded companies, he's appointed by a board of people that have interests in other corporations. Your top guy probably has interests in other companies as well.

      Most (if not all) business decisions are made based on the ego of the decision maker, rather than the elusive goal of maximizing profits.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    8. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by assertation · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be both petty and highly incompetent as a manager to do away with it.

      Well put.

    9. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      We had this problem a while back, so everyone brought in a coffee maker from home and sit on their desk. 30 to 40 coffee makers eating up power are always a great sign of passive protest (seems they left that one out of the employee handbook). Nothing brings change like a room full of firetraps.

    10. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      See, this is why I am just pro-alkaloid and ergoline employee benefits.

      A non-relevant link

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_San_Marcos_(LSD-25)

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    11. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You are leaving out medical costs from long term coffee use. Yes, to much coffee regularly takes a toll, especially on the heart. And just so you know, almost everyone drinks it in enough quantities to be damaging. IN about 15 more years there is going to be an 'epidemic' of heart problems.

      Not ever drinking caffeine is far better for productivity.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by nsteinme · · Score: 1

      free, legal performance enhancing drugs

      If you are so dependent on caffeine that you have come to expect your employer to sponsor your drug addiction, you have a problem. For starters, get some sleep for chrissakes.

      --
      call me FOSS im the boss with the sauce and the source
    13. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      IN about 15 more years there is going to be an 'epidemic' of heart problems.

      What is the basis for your start and end points? Is coffee only 20 years old?

    14. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by Rufty · · Score: 1

      The company before last I worked for, well, I knew it was in trouble when they started a drive to bring toilet paper to work: "only employees use it, so why should the company pay for it". And I really wish I was joking.

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    15. Re:Hacking off your nose to spite your face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insane ? Let me introduce you to ....
      http://www.news.com.au/ibm-hits-staff-for-tea-and-coffee/story-0-1225699059846

  13. Re:No Coffee = No Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many people suffer from this phenomenon, not just coders... Your statement is still correct, though.

  14. No bonuses? by jimbobborg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't received a bonus in about two years. It was a $1000 check. And the only reason I got that little gift is that I MADE money for my company. One of the perks of being a contractor for a small company. Of course, that contract ended, so I went to work for a larger IT company, and haven't received a bonus since. Working directly for a company is nice, but contracting pays better.

    1. Re:No bonuses? by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

      I haven't received a bonus in about two years. It was a $1000 check. And the only reason I got that little gift is that I MADE money for my company. One of the perks of being a contractor for a small company. Of course, that contract ended, so I went to work for a larger IT company, and haven't received a bonus since. Working directly for a company is nice, but contracting pays better.

      I thought that if you're a contractor, you're the company you work for. So if there are no bonuses, shouldn't you complain to your management?

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    2. Re:No bonuses? by oh-dark-thirty · · Score: 1

      I haven't received a bonus in about two years. It was a $1000 check. And the only reason I got that little gift is that I MADE money for my company. One of the perks of being a contractor for a small company. Of course, that contract ended, so I went to work for a larger IT company, and haven't received a bonus since. Working directly for a company is nice, but contracting pays better.

      I was a self-employed IT consultant/contractee for almost 10 years before I saw the writing on the wall 2 years ago...so I got myself a steady job in a smallish mfg. company, which by the way is the cheapest-ass industry you can ever work in, trust me on this... Although I miss the freedom and independence of being on my own, and I think it's ridiculous that I get the evil eye for walking in 3 minutes late, having a predictable paycheck is kind of nice for a change. We get free coffee (Folgers!), insurance with a reasonable kick-in, a 401k (no match last year), and that's about it. My 'bonus' check was $700 this year, which is a fraction of a percent of my actual salary... And they call me one of the lucky ones.

    3. Re:No bonuses? by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

      I worked for an 8a company on a government contract, so they took care of billing, pay, etc. Moving to a large IT government contractor had its benefits, but no bonus pay for us.

    4. Re:No bonuses? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Most large corporations have trouble dealing with single person shops. It's difficult to get added to the "Approved Vendors List", so managers tend to hire contractors from that list, which tends to be the larger contracting shops.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    5. Re:No bonuses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last year I got my biggest bonus in 10 years of IT ... just over $2k. That was only the third bonus I received in those 10 years (at 4 different companies). A week later, I got a letter stating that my position was no longer bonus eligible.

      Gee, thanks.

    6. Re:No bonuses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Working directly for a company is nice, but contracting pays better.

      Holy shit! Really! I never knew..

    7. Re:No bonuses? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      My 'bonus' check was $700 this year, which is a fraction of a percent of my actual salary... And they call me one of the lucky ones

      If $700 is a fraction of a percent of your salary, then your salary must be well over $70,000, so I think that probably does make you one of the lucky ones, given that this is around double the median salary for people in the USA.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:No bonuses? by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

      Ah. I work for a shop with 25-30 people, so our independent contractors really are independent.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  15. Some of us already have had cuts by Stregano · · Score: 1

    Bonuses, what are those? I don't think I have ever seen one of those.

    Seriously though, where I work, we get a 401(k), insurance, and free coffee. That is it.

    --
    The world is how you make it
    1. Re:Some of us already have had cuts by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      We get free sodas and the cafeteria only makes enough to pay the employees and costs. Coffee is through a local Starbucks in with the cafeteria so it has the same prices however there are regular coffee machines and individual cocoa packages in the snack areas. Insurance changed to a $5,000 deductible however you can put pre-tax salary into a medical fund to offset the deductible. No raise at all this year but we're (family) aren't hurting so I won't kick about it too much. They do want a yearly self assessment though as normal.

      "I worked a lot this year."

      Hey, you don't give me a raise, you don't get no self assessment :)

      (it's a joke; I did mine this year, more for me than for them though.)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
  16. that has been going for a long time by mapkinase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perk decrease has been going for a long time since dotbomb. In my previous company they used to have all kinds of free snacks (bagels, jams, cream cheese, fruits, salads) and happy hour with free hot food every Friday, then one sunny day it all ended abruptly, only caffeinated coffee remained (that reminded me of the practice of banana companies of the XIX century that encouraged workers to chew coca leaves).

    I work for government now and we do not have any free food at all. Good thing is that people can bring all kind of personal electric equipment like toasters, microwave ovens, fridges. We have kitchens on each floor where all this stuff is stored. I personally have a tea maker, an espresso maker and a coffee grinder in my office.

    It's better this way, guys.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:that has been going for a long time by geekoid · · Score: 1

      the dot com era was a freakishly high bar that will never be seen again. For those of us old timers, we knew it was temporary, we just enjoyed it.

      This is the same issue that almost every other layer of corporate life as gone through one time or another.

      I work for the government, and we aren't allowed to bring in personal items, fire hazard.

      Because some one who has to much time on there hands made a fuss about public employees getting 'taxpayer funded coffee' they took it away. So now everyone moseys over to Starbucks for coffee. The spineless counsel refused to make a fight over the issue, even though it was factually shown not to cost a 10th of what the person making the claim said it did. It was a jab at the mayor to show 'waste' that the employees get stuck with.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:that has been going for a long time by FileNotFound · · Score: 1

      Yeah I ended up working for the Gov after betting laid off from a .com. The .com had a 'free lunch', as in everyone got an $8 a day allowance to order from a set of restaurants for delivery. I loved it. But they got rid of that about 3 weeks after the layoffs hit.

      Yeah being able to bring in your own coffee maker and microwave and fridge is nice - but seriously it's a little absurd. We have cubes that have mini kitchens in the corners. One of the guys here has a toaster oven, fridge, microwave , coffee maker, water boiler and a rice cooker.

      Me? I got a water bottle. Sorry but cooking lunch at work doesn't appeal to me. Nor should it appeal to the employer to have their employees waste company time cooking lunch or going out to eat it.

      Back at the .com we'd get our lunch and eat it at our desk. We didn't have "lunch time" as such. So really we all worked 9 hours instead of 8. We ended up working at least an extra hour for $8.

      I dunno about you, but I think having a staff consisting entirely of college educated tech savvy people working an extra hour a day for $8 is a fantastic deal.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    3. Re:that has been going for a long time by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      I think this part

      "I work for the government, and we aren't allowed to bring in personal items, fire hazard."

      makes the management in your branch of Leviathan quite awful.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  17. In a Time When.... by flyneye · · Score: 1

    In a time when IT work for actual money is scarce, jobs outsourced and its easier to buy a new computer than fix the old one, one must look to their other talents for a living. I personally am handcrafting guitars while looking for a b.s. warehouse job. I can turn a jazz archtop over for $5k minimum. Till then I need work to buy my own coffee which is better than coffee service crap anyway.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  18. Fine, but I want more vacation by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would sacrifice all of those perks for more paid time off. HP offers new employees something like 12 days PTO and then it schedules 10 days of forced shutdowns per year to get accumulated PTO off the books. This means any new employee gets 2, count them, 2 days to schedule at their own convenience. That's deeply disrespectful. (I don't work at HP but I have friends that do).

    1. Re:Fine, but I want more vacation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to be off of work your attitude must be horrible and the quality of your work shitty.

      If you want a good work-life balance, do not work in IT. Unless you're one of those Opus Dei-style masochists that actually enjoy martyring themselves to machines and code.

    2. Re:Fine, but I want more vacation by hattig · · Score: 2

      Fix your employment laws. Life isn't just for working, but when the law is not there to benefit employees, the employees will get stiffed, guaranteed. 12 days is pitiful. The lawful minimum in the UK is 20 days plus public holidays (8 days), and nobody in IT would accept less than 25 days after a couple of years working after university. Other EU countries have more, yet none of these countries has employee productivity problems.

      Now what I don't mind is sacrificing salary to have unpaid leave, earning a week a year that you can use the next year or build it up over time - earning an unpaid sabbatical in effect, even if the time you can take it is quite restricted to less busy periods of the year.

    3. Re:Fine, but I want more vacation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's 10 days you start out at, and 1 floating holiday, and i believe it was 8 days of forced vacation use during this last holiday season, plus 2 days of holidays. Plus now our 401k is matched quarterly from 0-4%. It used to be 6%, and you have to work here for 3 years, but you get all the matches from the first 3 years after you reach that mark. I kinda wish i worked for MS instead.

    4. Re:Fine, but I want more vacation by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      Fix your employment laws.

      Disclaimer: i'm a registered republican, but I hate both parties now

      Republicans here (in the US) will never allow that. They believe that anything that's good for the free market (large corporations) is good for them. They actively work to injure themselves and benefit their masters by defeating public programs. This includes public health care, labor laws, minimum wage, financial help for the poor or unemployed... all of it. This is in spite of the fact that all of these things indirectly (and maybe directly at some point) help them. See how effective the corpratocracy brainwashing is here?

      I wonder how they would define a civilized society.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    5. Re:Fine, but I want more vacation by kionel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They'd define it as "The Civilization that regularly has the best quarterly statement."

      I'm horrified by how abusive Corporate America has become. Their avarice is astonishing. Worst of all, no one seems to have the guts to just say "No!" any longer.

      Allow me to explain: I left a fairly good self-employment gig in mid-2009 to rejoin the corporate workforce. (Family medical reasons made me look back to the corporate world.) Even in this crap economy I found myself working for an IT organization within two months of starting to look. Figured I'd got lucky.

      Ha!

      My firm is a nightmare. The company expects people to live to work. No discussion. No expectations. Your life is your job. It's utterly Dickensian.

      There is no hyperbole here. 14 - 16 hour days are common. Co-workers regularly put in 20+ hour days (yes, days) and are expected to be in the next morning. A friend of mine was dragged away from his cancer-stricken father's bedside on Christmas Eve by a Senior Director, despite not being on-call and being on vacation, because the SD demanded he look into a problem.

      Here's the weird part: Most of the employees love it here. Oh, they are the most unhealthy co-workers I've ever met (at least a quarter are dealing with chronic health issues), and their productivity stinks, but they all insist through fatigue-glazed eyes that this is "...a great company." Worse, they even go as far as to say "Just look at our stock price."

      Sadly, I'm the only one of the group who says wacky things like "You're putting your health at risk working like this!", or "If you continue to do the work of three people -- badly -- the company will never realize that we actually need three people."

      It's a wasted effort. The employees have drank deep of the Kool Aid, and don't want to even consider a different world view.

      Given that -- and given that Corporate America in the post-Bush years is still too powerful and unchecked -- I'm actually giving real thought to using my dual UK citizenship and heading back across the pond. Sure, I'll miss some things in the states, but not enough to kill myself for a freaking quarterly statement.

      --
      "'My Country Right or Wrong'is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober,'" -- Chesterton
    6. Re:Fine, but I want more vacation by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      Personally I'm shocked that Americans will put up with only 12 days in the first place. In Australia 20 is the legal minimum. Various countries in Europe have 25-30 as the norm. How the fuck do you even get by on 12, even before a company like up goes and pulls a dick move like that?

      --
      TIAEAE!
    7. Re:Fine, but I want more vacation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While true, not all of HP gets shut down for two weeks. You just need to hope you're in part of the business (Services) that doesn't have to shut down so you can keep all of your vacation.

    8. Re:Fine, but I want more vacation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a prior HP employee at a site that works as described, here's a little more detail:

      PTO time is measured as X days per year based upon working 100% of scheduled time. So they estimate that many days per year as available.
      PTO is generated per hour worked so if you are sick or miss days you get less PTO time.
      Overtime hours DO generate PTO as well but it's more likely to be asked if you want to go home early (low call volume days) than it is to be asked to stay late (high call volume days).

      If the center is closed, you don't work so don't get paid and don't generate more PTO time. If you use PTO time to make up for these days, it matches with the above poster's thoughts.

      If you call in sick it is assumed you are using a PTO day unless you tell them otherwise. (They're supposed to ask).
      If you will be missing multiple days of work you MUST call in ON EACH day you miss to inform them why you are missing it before your shift would start (sorry 7am folks).

      Missing a day or coming in late qualifies for a warning, 2 or more warnings can quickly generate a 'you're fired'. Missing a day without calling in is much more likely to generate a 'you're fired' situation.

      Turn over rates at Customer Service positions such as Tier 1 tech support are very large. Leaving usually 20 to 50 people in training at any time for a facility with say 150 to 250 people on the phone at a time.
      Tier 2 and Supervisor positions stick in there hoping for one of the infrequent promotions they might get.

      The free coffee at the center i worked at stopped flowing about 2 months after the place opened.
      I have since moved on to a place with free coffee, so updgrade!

      In short: Call centers suck all around for the majority of their employees. Have some sympathy when you call in.

    9. Re:Fine, but I want more vacation by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I think I get 13 days worth of PTO to use as I please, that's in addition to my 10 federal holidays and 1 floating holiday. It's certainly not great or even good. What makes up for it at least partly in my opinion is that they let us work a comressed work schedule.

      In a two week period I work eight nine hour days and one eight hour day, I get four weekend days off and one regularly scheduled day off. When a holiday falls on my regular day off those hours just shift to the next work day. I have it worked out such that every other weekend for me is a three day weekend. So I can schedule most appointments and such that would normally require use of my PTO on that extra day off. And having so many long weekends enables me to spend PTO more wisely and still get largish chunks of time off.

      Granted my setup isn't as good as is available in other parts of the world but for this area it's pretty good.

    10. Re:Fine, but I want more vacation by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, it's more like 11 days for salaried n00bs (plus 10 holidays), those 10 days of shutdown included 2 holidays so it was only 8 days (Christmas and New Year's), and you make it sound like this one-time, unprecedented shutdown happens every year. You get an vacation day every year after that, up to 10. Then there's the 20 years of service mark, which is entirely different.

      Considering there was a hiring freeze and a bunch of layoffs, there aren't many people in that boat. And the shutdown was announced in May, so it's only the n00bs hired between Jan and May (4 months) you're talking about - anyone signing on after that should have been told, or I'd question the validity of the employment contract. And if you wanted to borrow days off from next year, or just work without pay for any or all of the shutdown, that's fine too, so you have flexibility there.

      If you don't work at HP, why are you commenting on their employment practices? For that matter, why am I? Oh wait, it's because I do work there. Also known as "here" to those of us who do.

      HP hasn't been the easiest company to work for over the past 9 months, but it's not as bad as you say. I'm pretty sure I didn't leak any info that wouldn't be available by getting a job interview, so I don't mind clarifying.

      You should ask your friends if anything I'm saying rings a bell. I was bought as an EDS employee, so I got the standard 3-week vacation from day 1. 3com employees now count as HP too, but they are still in the merging phase so they're irrelevant. Ultimately, you're talking about maximum 1000 people out of 300k plus.

  19. You're lucky - everyone else has been there by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We've long had a person head up a 'coffee club', collecting from the java
    junkies on the floor every month. Enough money was left to have a group lunch
    at month-end. AFAICT the coffee machine was there long before, industrial type
    -- 2 open carafes with an orange one for decaf, you probably saw one in a
    diner somewhere -- not the 10 or 12 cup coffeemakers you get from Costco.

    401K? Long gone from the employer's side, we're waiting for the first
    anniversary announcement, if they will reinstate their contribution. I feel
    less of a team player if they did not.

    Yup, not just in IT. This was the travel industry. Welcome to the club, gents.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:You're lucky - everyone else has been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in IT in the travel industry :/. Last year the company cut coffee and then a few weeks later reinstated it. The coffee they provide is pretty.... rancid. Yeah, rancid is how I'd describe it. Most of us just bring in our own and just use the hot water. They'd cut the hot water machine once and replaced it with a single carafe heater. So instead of people coming and quickly getting a cup of hot water they'd queue up waiting for a dinky machine to finish heating up half a gallon of water, get grumbly when someone would use a full cup, or someone would neglect to put water back in. They finally saw the light and re-instated that too.

    2. Re:You're lucky - everyone else has been there by assertation · · Score: 1

      Nice to know we aren't being singled out

    3. Re:You're lucky - everyone else has been there by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If you have a coffee fund, and you have money left over, you are screwing people.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:You're lucky - everyone else has been there by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Nope, they all looked forward to the once-a-month lunch they have in a restaurant, buffet-style too.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    5. Re:You're lucky - everyone else has been there by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      If you have a coffee fund, and you have money left over, you are screwing people.

      I don't think times are so hard they have to prostitute themselves.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    6. Re:You're lucky - everyone else has been there by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Ehhh, not so nice really. Just about everyone is hurting now. It's a global recession (more like depression). Right now, life just sucks ass!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  20. Re:How to get a payrise without asking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The easiest way to get a pay rise is to simply cut down time you actually work at work :) Want 10% rise? Then either leave 45 minutes earlier or spend that time browing (if someone is timing your work).

  21. 401k???? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wait: we don't get pensions anymore. 401k contributions ARE our retirement plans. Cutting 401k is the same as saying "we care about you SO little, that we hope you die hungry and cold in your old age."

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:401k???? by yttrstein · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Cutting 401k is the same as saying "we care about you SO little, that we hope you die hungry and cold in your old age.""

      Having been in the unfortunate position of being forced to cut 401K contributions by asshole management, I can promise you that it's never got anything to do with them *just* not caring about their employees in their old age. It also has to do with trusting fully that the whole company will be Somebody Else's Problem inside 36 months, whether by bankruptcy or by acquisition.

      Because I have this sort of experiential knowledge of the motivations of asshole management and executive layers, I make a point to never do business of any sort with any company that treats its employees badly. Without exception, every company that treats its employees badly has absolutely zero faith in every element in their product line and are interested only in lining their own pockets with cash.

    2. Re:401k???? by JoeWalsh · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no, no! They're just trying to help you by encouraging you to be responsible for your own future. In the past, the company was stealing your opportunity to be fully responsible for your retirement. Now, they feel bad about that, and are giving that responsibility back to you. It's time to celebrate!

      Next month, they're going to stop stealing your opportunity to work twice as hard for half as much pay. It's a glorious future that your corporate masters have planned for you. Celebrate, slave, celebrate!

    3. Re:401k???? by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
      Happened at my work.

      Had 100% matching up to 4% and last year was cut in half, 50% up to 4%. Yes, it was a major slap in the face, but in the end we were purchased by another company with 100% up to 5%. Major morale booster with the new company, but I'm fairly certain now it was all planned manipulation of our emotions.

    4. Re:401k???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, how'd the Perot to Dell transition go?

    5. Re:401k???? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Wait: we don't get pensions anymore. 401k contributions ARE our retirement plans. Cutting 401k is the same as saying "we care about you SO little, that we hope you die hungry and cold in your old age."

      To have vindictive feelings mean they're still caring about you, not in a healthy way but it's the thought that counts. I think this is more a sign of profound and chilling indifference. You are consigned to oblivion. You are erased from history. No one will remember your name. They truly don't fucking care.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:401k???? by Grizzled+Old+Scout · · Score: 1

      And whining about a lack of 401(k) contributions is the same thing as saying "hey, we expect you to fund our retirement years long after we have stopped doing any productive work for you."

    7. Re:401k???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, if you're under the age of 40 (well, 50 now), social security probably won't be there when you retire.

    8. Re:401k???? by Ken+D · · Score: 1

      It's called "Deferred Compensation" and it's all the rage in the C-Suite.

    9. Re:401k???? by gangien · · Score: 1

      I would forgo almost all my perks/benefits and just take an increase in pay if i could. but unfortunately uncle sam and company make that expensive.

    10. Re:401k???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you would rather be a tax-payer for a generation of retired workers with no pension at all? Which is more likely: the government will allow a massive number of voters to live on less than $500 per month, or your future taxes will be increased to compensate for inadequate corporate retirement plans? Either the government pays for these people, or their employers contribute to a retirement plan. Expecting everyone (especially those in minimum wage) to save for retirement is a bit naiive, so the alternative is old people (with a vote and nothing better to do with their time than figuring out how to use it) starving in the streets.

  22. coffee? so what... by cavtroop · · Score: 1

    What really kills me is the REAL perks getting eliminated - bonuses, my whole 401k match is gone now, health insurance cost going through the roof, etc. THAT hurts my bottom line, coffee does not.

    I understand that they cut the 401k match and increased the health insurance premium to try to save a few jobs - but jesus, looking at the bloat in some of the organizations here, lay off a few of them (sales, I'm looking at you. You spend ALL DAY on youtube. Yes, I can prove it), you'd think you could cut some of them, and keep the match.

  23. Failure Road! by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    I have worked in a troubled business in which advancement and raises were excessively limited due to economic problems. It auto creates a very hostile and non productive work environment. It is the employees business to do what they are hired to do. It is the businesses obligation to have the money on hand to advance good workers and keep a reasonable work environment. The nickle and dime, Scrooge routine will steer a company right into their own dumpster.

  24. Fewer 'perks' please? by rve · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Some company perks that I just don't want and will never use:
    - I don't want a company celphone. I have my own phone, I don't want to have to keep track of business and private calls, I don't want my boss to get a list of all the calls I make in a month, and I don't want to have to carry around two phones. The company phone is lying in the closet, unused, the subscription fee is being paid for nothing.
    - I don't want a company laptop. I don't need one for my work (customers *naturally* never allow machines on their network that they didn't provide themselves). For private use, it's useless. It does not have the specs I would have chosen for my own laptop, and I'm not free to modify it or change the software on it. It's been lying in the closet, unused. It's worse than useless, as I can't justify buying one for myself as long as I "have a perfectly ok laptop gathering dust in the closet".
    - Company presentations preceeded by Paintball or Casino: please keep it serious and treat me like an adult. I don't come to the office to play games with colleagues, just give the presentation.
    - Free coffee: I don't care. It's nice if it's there, but it's such a minor issue that if they want to save the shockingly huge amount of money that goes into rent and support of these machines, by all means do so, I'm not going to work less hard if I have to buy my own drinks.

    1. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was with you until the last line.

    2. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're wrong about company phone.
      Company phone is what you switch off the moment your work hours end. You use it on business travels, you use it during rush and in case you promise to be catchable.
      Private phone number is the one which you keep secret.

      As for laptop, YMMV. If you're a field technician, your company laptop will be invaluable for you because it has what your work requires, not what you would buy for yourself.

      Free coffee... only as long as I know the money they save on my coffee land in -my- pocket, not CEO's. Otherwise, I prefer to get the free coffee if I can. I worked where I had to buy my own and it really adds up if you count it over a year.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your laptop really *never gets used*, just use it for personal use. Install whatever you want on it. If you ever need to return it, format or uninstall or make it have an "accident" or whatever you need to do. Now it's a free personal laptop.

    4. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by tsstahl · · Score: 0

      If you venture out from under the bridge, you'll find that most other people you share the planet with are naturally social beings.

      By all means, return your unused assets to the department. Around here a contemporary laptop is like gold and could probably be bartered for sexual favors.

      I suppose in some places the coffee machines are expensive cost centers. However in the vast majority of places I have worked, consulted, and visited, the coffee machine is hardly ever a single step up from the two burner Bunn. The budget for coffee in my entire department is $2500.00 for the year. Our supplier gave us the machine on a free lease basis as long as we buy the supplies from them. Oh, lest I forget, the budget figure also includes water for the cooler, creamer, sugar, and eco friendly wooden stir sticks.

      In return for that 2500 bucks, the company gets camaraderie, stimulated staff, and a place where people can go and destress for a few minutes.

    5. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by rve · · Score: 1

      I used to agree with you but changed my mind when I was told how much these machines cost the employer per year.

    6. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by rve · · Score: 1

      If you venture out from under the bridge, you'll find that most other people you share the planet with are naturally social beings.

      By all means, return your unused assets to the department. Around here a contemporary laptop is like gold and could probably be bartered for sexual favors.

      Bah, why so rude?

      I'm a family man, not a kid, and I have a life outside of work. A life that company meetings eat into, so I'd prefer them to get down to business rather than pad them out with hours of activities aimed at the 20 - 30 yr old single male demographic.

    7. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      How much would they cost the _employee_ each year instead though?

    8. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      "free coffee" is a REAL big deal when you work on a campus that owns and operates a cafeteria through a 3rd party cafeteria provider.
      1) The cafe locks in services, departments that want coffee must buy it from the cafe as a service, or as individuals you have to buy it by the cup in the cafe. having your own coffee pot is strictly against the contract the cafe has with the building. They charge nearly $1.50 for crap near-instant coffee when they're open, plus an extra charge for the cup if you don't bring your own (and more if the cup is "excessively large" which I have yet to find one that is not, so we all use massive travel cups). Creamers are extra! Fresh brewed "gourmet" coffee is over $2 a cup, and there's no such thing as premium coffee (espresso, etc). A basic coffee habit buying coffee in the cafe gets expensive FAST. I started bringing 1 cup full from home, and having a refil at 8:30, 10 ans 11:30. That was running $110 /month plus tax!!! more for COFFEE that I typically spent on a week's groceries.

      2) The cafe is closed from 9:30 to 11:30. That means no coffee between those hours unless your department pays for service, or unless you take a 15+ minute round trip to the nearest gas station that serves sludge in a cup or 20 to a starbucks.

      3) Depertments can buy coffee as a "service" from the cafe. This comes in the form of rental on a pot system (industrial 3 burner Brunn type system like you see in a pancake house or restaurant). They provide coffee and creamer by the box and we brew it ourselves. It's a lot cheaper than buying by the cup, but for a department of about 80 people, its still hundreds of dollars per month.

      When i joined, i was one of 3 coffee drinkers out of 16 people in our area, so we did not have a pot at all. (well, we did, untiul building services found out and took it away). I initially went to quit coffee (that failed), so I started lugging a 16 cup thermos to work and drinking cups from that. It was cheap, but i looked like an idiot walking across the parking lot with than cannister. After a few months, 6 of the 16 (a few people rotated out) in our immediate area were doing it too, as well as about a dozen upstairs also part of our group, so the boss offered to start the process getting a machine. At this point, we pay $2 per employee per week for coffee service, half is subsidized OUT OF POCKET by our own boss...

      A couple of months ago, the cafe nearly double the price of the coffee service. Several depertments cut off the service as a result. It was back on in 2 weeks. Performance dropped precipitously! The compmany now pays for our entire main group, about 85 people, to have coffee at no charge.

      Other buildings on campus that have their own seperate cafe's do not have such restrictive coffee practices, pay loewr rates, have "community funded" pots in some places, and in others even have a full service coffee station where someone is paid to keep the pots full all the time. 2 of our buildings have a coffee shop in them, seperate from the cafe.

      We're still fighting them on Soda for the non-coffee drinkers. There are soda machines all over in break rooms, but it's fucking $1.50 for a 12oz can!!! It's CRIMINAL for a company to profit so highly off employees who have no other real options (there are few if any department fridges, and if you put a can of soda in their, you'll never see it again). We're trying to force the cafe to provide soda as it does coffee, by the pallett, and do away with the machines except in the cafe and public areas. We'd bring 2 liters, but there's NO ICE MACHINE ANYWHERE, except in the cafe, which they charge $0.20 for a small cup of ice (the 4 hours a day they're open, which closes compeltely at 1:30).

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    9. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      My apologies if my post read more assy than yours.

      I understand your desire. In counterbalance I offer that it is the effort that counts, not the activity. I never thought I would find myself defending management on Slashdot, but here goes. I have sat through my share of Stupid Stuff like guessing birthdays, trading anecdotes coworkers would never think true of you. These asinine and boring activities could never appeal to all hands. Their goal is to get you involved and 'present' for the task at hand instead of pouring over a crackberry, or doodling to do lists on napkins.

      I could easily agree that testosterone laden activities more suited to Dave and Buster's than the boardroom are a bit over the top. As a family man though, how many tea parties have you had to suffer through with bears wearing bonnets and Chinese made toys of dubious structural integrity?

    10. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by rve · · Score: 1

      Hmm, if your boss is willing to provide free power and tap water, employees could pool together to buy a coffee maker and some coffee. Should even taste better than that brown goo the coffee robot pees into our cups.

    11. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by rve · · Score: 1

      How much would they cost the _employee_ each year instead though?

      In the dot com recession, the boss justified saving on perks in terms average annual salaries. Something vaguely along these lines (don't remember the exact figures):
      - Leased art off the walls in all the offices: 1 job saved
      - Cancel coffee machine contracts: 0.5 jobs saved
      - Pick up after ourselves a bit more and have the cleaners come 3 rather than 5 nights a week: 0.5 jobs saved

      The gist of it was that a list of seemingly small and petty savings that everybody thought would add up to peanuts actually did as much towards balancing the budget as laying off two people. When you look at it that way, free coffee seems less important, even if it's not _your_ job that's on the line.

    12. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read his post? The service contract forbids employees from having their own coffee makers.

      That nonsense would be enough for me to quit if I was a coffee drinker.

    13. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...having your own coffee pot is strictly against the contract the cafe has with the building.

      Your company/building has a contract, but you don't. Wait for a sale on one of those single-cup coffee makers. Keep it in a locked cabinet/desk drawer between cups. Based on your costs, you should break even in under two months. Worst case, you get a reprimand from your boss - unless maybe you cut him in on the action. For hot tea drinkers, there are similar devices to dispense hot water by the cup.

      For soda drinkers, maybe those plastic freezer ice packs and soft-sided coolers sound like the way to go. Wait for a sale on soda in the stores, then buy in bulk for around $0.14 per can. Bring in as many as needed for the day.

      If those ideas aren't tenable for whatever reasons, organize a boycott. Everybody drinks only water at work for 6 months or however many it takes. Chip in on a few Pur or Brita filter pitchers if the tap water is bad. If boycotting cafeteria drinks is insufficient, boycott it entirely - everybody brings sack lunches. Even if a few people backslide now and then, it should send an effective message.

      BTW, the pricing you've quoted is ridiculous. I've seen better vending machine prices on hotel floors. Odds are, the prices are as high as they are because your employer gets a cut of the profit. If that's the case, your negotiating position is worse than you think.

      - T

    14. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      I don't care whether or not a company offers free coffee if we're evaluating it on the basis of coffee. The last place I worked on-site had a pretty hardcore one-cup coffee maker with all sorts of different varieties/flavors of coffee to choose from. I brought my own. They also had a water machine and soda available in the fridge, which I typically did take advantage of. No big deal either way.

      That said, I would be worried about a company who used to offer it no longer doing so. Are their profit margins really so thin that they have to cut an expense as small as coffee, with all the potential drawbacks that might entail? It doesn't sound like a company in good financial condition, and as somebody who worked freelance at a place swirling the drain, I can tell you it has a MASSIVE effect on just about EVERYTHING. (I think the company ultimately survived, though since I left I obviously have no idea what kind of financial shape they are in these days; whether they're back to a comfortable level or still struggling.)

      If a company never offered it to begin with, I suppose I wouldn't read into it one way or another. As I said, it's not a big deal taken by itself -- only if you ask yourself what it might mean.

    15. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If the cost of coffee is 0.5 jobs, then either that's spread among a huge number of people, or the company was getting ripped off. If it's the former, then why not offer to allow the employees to pay for it? The cost of buying coffee in bulk is a lot less than the cost of everyone buying it individually. If there's a bit of budget surplus somewhere later, you can subsidise it more, and maybe make it completely free again if business improves.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    16. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Free coffee: I don't care. It's nice if it's there, but it's such a minor issue that if they want to save the shockingly huge amount of money that goes into rent and support of these machines, by all means do so, I'm not going to work less hard if I have to buy my own drinks.

      Apparently you've not noticed that it costs $5-10/day to buy coffee at a coffee shop or other takeout joint, plus the lost productivity, vs. the $5-10/WEEK it costs to chip in to a "coffee club" at work.

      The sad thing is I've worked for companies who signed "exclusive" provider deals with cafeteria companies, making it illegal to run coffee clubs in the office. Even sadder were the places that claimed coffee machines are a "hazard" and therefore not allowed on the floors.

      The most disgusting I ran across was one company that allowed smokers to take breaks whenever they wanted, but only allowed one coffee break in the morning and afternoon. Why? 3/4 of the managers smoked.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    17. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      yea, thanks. Not to mention: Cube power grids are NOT designed to have high amp devices like coffe pots/warmers/etc plugged in. It's an OSHA violation to do so, and those fines are WAY more than coffee costs.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    18. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Coffee pots? Yea, sorry, that's an OSHA violation. The cube power systems are not rated for that. not to mention, bulding services allowing that would itself violate the contract. it;s a terminable offense to use ANY non-approved device that's not USB powered. I can wait a while for coffee, but at 4.5v that's gonna be a REALLY LONG brew time...

      We already protested, and were met with "we don;t care, suck it up" attitudes, since the contract is more than a decade from it's end. Also, it lasted about 2 whole days before morale tumbled, and caffine withdrawls kicked in.

      Yea, prices are rediculous, we all agree. nothing we can do until the contract expires. They used to be able to raise prices at will, but at least not the board now gets to approve that (last contract renegotiation about 4 years ago apparently set that in place). They can raise 5% without asking, and do EVERY year.

      2600 people in our building, and it's gotten bad enough that MAYBE 300 people actually eat lunch here daily. The rest either take the trip off campus, or walk 1/4 mile down the hill to the next building which has a much better cafe. When it rains, the line in the cafe is rediculous, and that day they'll serve they're 2 most expensive dishes and the salad bar will be closed...

      5.5 more years in the contract, they've already been told it will not be renewed. The employer is a non-profit (or at least this division is) because of our contracts with the government.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    19. Re:Fewer 'perks' please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I hadn't considered cubicle limitations. Those single-cup brewers are probably too much of a power draw for those.

      I'd guess total boycott is your only way to an early out, and it sounds like that is infeasible. Maybe an exceptionally good thermos with home-brewed coffee in it would go some way to reducing your personal costs. That stinks, sorry.

      - T

  25. When did coffee become so expensive? by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While in larger companies doing away with free coffee could be a sensible alternative to laying off perhaps 0.5% of the work force, you have to wonder about the margins and sustainability of a corporation that actually *needs* to do that. As for smaller companies - if they can't even afford free coffee, it must really suck to work there.

    I can only recommend managers to think about how much free for employees (good) food and drinks actually cost you compared to the part of the salaries that goes towards pizza/drinks at work otherwise, what the benefits are (healthier employees, less time wasted ordering stuff or going out to buy it) and how it may or may not make people feel more attached/loyal to your company. As for coffee - think of the headaches from caffeine deprivation you might induce if you don't provide it. ;-)

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
    1. Re:When did coffee become so expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only recommend managers to think

      You lost me.

    2. Re:When did coffee become so expensive? by Kozz · · Score: 1

      When did coffee become so expensive?

      Here's some outrage for you... my employer installed expensive coffee equipment in our cafe about two years ago. You know, so you can walk up and order a cappucino, espresso, or whatever all those other fancy flavored coffees -- their own little Starbucks (yay! [/sarcasm]). I can't begin to imagine the thousands and thousands our CEO spent on the equipment and labor installing the 10ft corian countertop / work area holding all the coffee equipment plus complete plumbing, etc., not to mention maintenance. I can count on one hand the number of times I've seen someone order a "fancy" coffee (posted prices vary from $2.50 to $4.50USD).

      And they continue to maintain the equipment, but most of the labor goes towards filling the four to six carafes with "regular" black coffee that most everyone drinks heavily and -- you guessed it -- is free.

      Just had to get that off my chest. When our CEO teams up with HR, only bad things can happen. Ask me another time about how my super health-oriented employer increased costs of burgers & fried foods to subsidize the low, low prices on the salad bar. *sigh*

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    3. Re:When did coffee become so expensive? by Sandbags · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Coffee is a cost like any other. To support employees, certain costs are expected. A computer to sit at, an ergonomic chair, pens and paper, ink, janitorial services, bathroom supplies, phone and DID number, and more.

      A complete coffee service costs less than $1 per employee (that drinks it) per day if bought in industrial bulk. there are dozens of other costs that far exceed that. many companies simply use an honor system and place a can with a slot near the coffee pot and ask folks to spare $0.25 for each cup, and many not only break even on that, but actually profit, and use the money for company and area parties.

      As we roll out IT improvements, costs there are shrinking, making us more competitive. As we roll out the IP phone system, we're shifting a whole building of employees into at-home workers (we already have about 3,000 of them), which is not only a huge facility cost savings, but there's tax incentives to do it too. Desktop imaging pretty much has put the quash on most helpdesk calls. going paperless for most things is also reducing costs greatly. Salaries have been flat for 2 years in a row. We're more profitable than EVER in the company history. Curring coffee would be seen as nothing more than an profiteering decision and a slap in the face to HR and productivity, and we'd actually loose some good employees over it I'm sure (Hots mainframe operators LIVE on coffee and coffee alone it seems, and those guys are REALLY hard to come by and claim way in excess of $100,000 salaries).

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    4. Re:When did coffee become so expensive? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      My PhD supervisor bought our lab a coffee machine that took little capsules. Apart from being incredibly bad for the environment (they were 90% plastic, single use things with a bit of coffee, a filter and a plastic holder), they were expensive. For the cost of making one cup of coffee with that machine, we could make an entire pot of coffee with freshly ground (and much higher quality) beans bought from a local shop. So we did that instead. I think only one person in the lab ever bought capsules for the machine, and that was only once. The rest of us took it in turns to buy a couple of kilograms of coffee beans.

      The point of my rambling anecdote is that good coffee can be very cheap and bad coffee can be very expensive. If coffee is really a big expense for your business, then you should look at whether you can get the same (or better) quality for less. Take a look at how Google does it; a commercial espresso machine on each floor with a couple of coffee grinders next to it. If you want coffee, you grind a small amount, pop it in the machine, and press a button. The cost is tiny (and, actually, the beans are not very good - they seem to have gone to the Starbucks school of coffee roasting) and the quality is reasonable (and could be superb if they bought better beans).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  26. False economy by DrXym · · Score: 1

    I used to work in a place where if you worked on you got a free meal in the canteen. People used to work 2 or 3 hours extra and all for the price of a meal. They cut out the practice and guess what the result was?

  27. It's An Employer's Market by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Twenty years ago, companies jumped-up IT guys and made them "Web Masters" -- coders, server maintainers, content creators and (in their own minds) designers -- giving them six figure salaries. Every company, no matter how small, felt it needed to have a "server room" and maintain their e-mail service locally. The Marketing secretary always needed help figuring out how to print her boss's agenda out of Lotus Organizer.

    Times changed.

    Now, companies buy website templates for sixty bucks non-exclusive (three grand exclusive) and they're sitting in a server room at a place called Dreamhost or Hostgator. The content is maintained via a CMS run by the Marketing secretary. Employers and employees are using Gmail and other cloud-based e-mail systems because the lines between personal and work IT space have become so blurred. Nobody needs help printing anymore, because an entire generation has been raised on the Internet and personal computer systems.

    People will take what they feel (rightly or wrongly) is their due, whether you give it to them or not.
    And employers will replace them with 20-something go-getters with better attitudes and more up-to-date skills, and at half the salary.

    1. Re:It's An Employer's Market by tsstahl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And employers will replace them with 20-something go-getters with better attitudes and more up-to-date skills, and at half the salary.

      Where is this elusive species to be found in quantity? The specimens I am familiar with have a hard time spelling "Word", much less using it. To them "The Web" is Yahoo, Gmail, and Facebook. And finally, SMTP is text slang for Suck My Teats and Poonani (less vulgar translation).

      Yes, they can print and download, but in my experience deep knowledge of the plumbing behind the Internet is fading, not expanding.

    2. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Moryath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Now, companies buy website templates for sixty bucks non-exclusive (three grand exclusive) and they're sitting in a server room at a place called Dreamhost or Hostgator.

      Getting hacked regularly by some turd who wants to take over the server to make into a warez repository, spam relay, look around for credit card records, or replace all the images with "I kno u dont want 2 see thiz but herez tha ded iraqi babies tha ebil US killz."

      The content is maintained via a CMS run by the Marketing secretary.

      Who barely knows how to spell, let alone write, and thus the site looks incredibly unprofessional. But hey, you get what you pay for. And the exec who set it up this way got a blowjob from the Marketing Boobs...er Secretary.

      Employers and employees are using Gmail and other cloud-based e-mail systems because the lines between personal and work IT space have become so blurred.

      Which works great right until either their net connection goes down, or Gmail has an outage, or AT&T's crappy network is shitting again, and they're bugging the IT guy to "FIX MY GMAIL ON MY IPHONE FIX MY GMAIL ON MY IPHONE FIX MY GMAIL ON MY IPHONE."

      Nobody needs help printing anymore, because an entire generation has been raised on the Internet and personal computer systems

      Right up until they jam the printer, or come up with a document with nonstandard margins, or do 1001 other things that the lusers always do.

      The level of competence in the average office is still right about zero. The difference today is that rather than having respect for the skills of those who can actually handle technology, the lusers have been told they have the right to treat IT staff as somewhere between the House N****r and Corporate Slave. Think about it. Would you stand over the guy fixing your car yelling "FIX IT FASTER I WANT IT NOW FIX IT FIX IT"? No? IT staff get that crap all day long. They are stuck in the no-win scenario wherein if required preventative maintenance means taking something offline for a couple hours, they are yelled at, but if they don't do the preventative maintenance, they get yelled at for not doing it when the system REALLY goes tits-up. They get nickeled and dimed for wanting to implement real security precautions such as proper firewalling and password security, but then blamed for "not doing enough" when Ditzy McSluttyboobs the secretary goes download-happy and unleashes half a dozen worms inside the corporate network.

      And increasingly, they're supposed to be "supporting" systems spread over so many locations and they're only given proper admin control over their own locality, meaning that they get yelled at for telling someone that the problem is at Site #3, and yes, it's being worked on, and no, they don't have the access to fix it directly here at Site #2, and then Dipshit McBrainlesssuit sends an email to his bosses about how things are "always down" and "these guys aren't doing their jobs" in order to try to "force" the poor IT guy to "work faster" on something that isn't even under his control.

    3. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Rhaban · · Score: 5, Funny

      And employers will replace them with 20-something go-getters with better attitudes and more up-to-date skills, and at half the salary.

      I'd like to see how those 20-something will use their up-to-date skills when faced with my 80% cobol environment.

    4. Re:It's An Employer's Market by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      Yes, they can print and download, but in my experience deep knowledge of the plumbing behind the Internet is fading, not expanding.

      Most companies don't need "deep knowledge of the plumbing behind the Internet" to run their business. Again, twenty years ago, companies hired these gurus because the Net was new. Now they know better. A trucking company doesn't need a scientist who understands the physics behind combustion engines on staff, they need drivers.

    5. Re:It's An Employer's Market by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      We could go back and forth all day. If you admire Asimov's future history of a society of button pushers with no idea how to maintain civilization, then I guess advocating specialized mediocrity is fine.

      Personally, I would prefer drivers that could handle most minor repairs on their own, and fairly accurately diagnose the majors. No, they don't need to know squat about how much power a given engine can deliver to the wheel, but they do need to know that stuff goes boom in there, turning this thing, which connects to the transmission and the rest of the drive train.

      Modern run of the mill IT staff more than ever before need to be generalists, not specialists. The problem domains are bigger, not smaller. The CMS system used by the marketing secretary will invariably need troubleshooting. Is the problem the user, the comp, the net, the hosted CMS, the hosted database it connects to... The list goes on.

    6. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And employers will replace them with 20-something go-getters with better attitudes and more up-to-date skills, and at half the salary."

      Boy, you can really tell how old you are right away.

    7. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      And employers will replace them with 20-something go-getters with better attitudes and more up-to-date skills, and at half the salary.

      And with a quarter or less the experience, and correspondingly reduced productivity and quality of output.

      (See, I can make sweeping generalisations too!)

    8. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hosting your own email service is cheap and easy. Probably even cheaper than paying another service to do it for you. Not only that, but your emails are safer in-house than at some 3rd party service where anyone can look over your emails. And, you can set up encryption and fingerprinting among other things. In the past it would just take one Linux or Windows server to set it up. Now, it can just exist as one of many virtual machines on a single server providing different services. I guess the only expense is paying the IT worker you're already paying anyways to do his job. I think you are a classic case of someone who sees IT as an unnecessary expense instead of the reality. Thinking that a little 0.25 a cup coffee for a handful employees a year is worth a cut, is the most retarded thing I've ever heard of. And, thinking that it costs very much at all to host email, you obviously have no idea how IT works. Maybe that's why you're not in IT, so maybe you shouldn't be talking. Jackass.

    9. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are looking in the wrong places. I fall into this category.

    10. Re:It's An Employer's Market by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      hehe, as someone who has done hiring for IT... I'd love to know and find these 20-something go-getters. What I find are apathetic kids who went to a 2-year technical school or even a 4-year college and have put zero personal time or investment in their skills or training and expect to be handed everything. They want to text/facebook and slip in a bare minimum of work somewhere along the way.

      I'd say this is anecdotal but in interviewing and hiring/training hundreds, I've found a handful with which this doesn't apply. One was a philosophy grad-student who had no computer experience prior. Sad.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    11. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Insightful and fucking brilliant!

    12. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As cynical as this is; it is common place through out and pretty spot on. I work in a large law firm, and this pretty much sums it up in a not so eloquent way.

    13. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Plus I had 3 people with printing related problems just yesterday.

    14. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Now, companies buy website templates for sixty bucks non-exclusive (three grand exclusive) and they're sitting in a server room at a place called Dreamhost or Hostgator. The content is maintained via a CMS run by the Marketing secretary. Employers and employees are using Gmail and other cloud-based e-mail systems because the lines between personal and work IT space have become so blurred. Nobody needs help printing anymore, because an entire generation has been raised on the Internet and personal computer systems.

      I don't know where you work, but it sounds pretty crappy.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    15. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And employers will replace them with 20-something go-getters with better attitudes and more up-to-date skills, and at half the salary.

      That's a good one. I find the youth of today a bunch of spoiled whiny crybabies who assume they are "entitled".

    16. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And employers will replace them with 20-something go-getters with better attitudes and more up-to-date skills, and at half the salary.

      That's pretty funny! Most of the 20-somethings I've run into in the workplace have over-developed senses of entitlement (they want to be a project lead in a year, OR ELSE) and lack a lot of the skills fundamental to a workplace - working well with others, creating proper technical specifications, controlling their emotions, etc. Half the salary sounds about right, though.

    17. Re:It's An Employer's Market by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Employers and employees are using Gmail [citation needed]

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    18. Re:It's An Employer's Market by jargoone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You sound really angry. You should try a blankie and a nap. Afterward, maybe go back to school so you can get a real job.

    19. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly the problem. Supporting the infrastructure isn't a "real job." Maybe IT guys should take a lesson from plumbers. They make more money than middle management, but get less respect. The only compensation is being able to moon your clients without significant blowback.

    20. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the 20-something go-getters you speak of didn't get named the me-generation because of the helpful personalities. Hiring 20-somethings will only increase the feelings of what people believe is their due.

    21. Re:It's An Employer's Market by nine-times · · Score: 1

      And employers will replace them with 20-something go-getters with better attitudes

      eh... have you met the "20-something go-getters"? They don't really go-get. They want their free coffee more than anyone.

    22. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And employers will replace them with 20-something go-getters with better attitudes and more up-to-date skills, and at half the salary.

      Not likely.

      Everybody I've met that's Gen-Y or younger has a sense of entitlement that's off the scale. It's so bad that two Fortune 50 companies I've worked for do their damnedest not to hire techs and engineers under 30 for a couple of reasons, mainly: lack of education (sure, they have the paper but they're dumber than shit), lack of motivation (since when has showing up to work on time, if at all, been considered a job skill), and a lack of technical expertise (sorry kids, you still need to know data structures, C# gui builders don't cut it).

      I could go on. Am I talking about the average under thirty-something on Slashdot? No. I'm talking about the average thirty-something that I'm seeing in the workplace.

      Employers in my area are getting the message that hiring inexperienced drones on the cheap is a recipe for disaster. And they're right. Add in the issues of maturity (don't jump to conclusions, take a step back, take a deep breath, and begin to digest the problem) and polish (wear a goddamned tie when dealing with the customer when appropriate and don't bitch about it) and there you have it.

    23. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Bovius · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      A little bitter, are we?

      I've worked in IT, so I understand that it sucks sometimes and people have unreasonable expectations, and I know that requests for IT are either for the nebulous future or "do it right now".

      That being said, I've found that good communication mitigates almost all of these problems. If you talk like a human being and treat others like human beings (which, quite frankly, it looks like you don't), people tend to respond in kind.

      Communicating IT problems in a way that makes sense to non-IT people is and always has been the biggest part of this job. If you don't do it well, I imagine the profession would be very unpleasant for you.

    24. Re:It's An Employer's Market by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I know I'm offtopic, but I don't want any of my drivers 'fixing' their own trucks. I don't care if they are a mechanic. I want them to take them to the mechanic that has a contract with me, and get it fixed that way. If one of my truckies of forkies try to repair their vehicle it's a violation of their employee agreement. /tangent.

    25. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see we work at the same employer. Let's do lunch.

    26. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody needs help printing anymore, because an entire generation has been raised on the Internet and personal computer systems.

      I think this is also not the case anymore. My wife is a History teacher at a public high school and every year she complains that every new class of freshman coming in has to be taught basic word processing and spreadsheet skills. Last semester only 30% of her class knew how to save a file in a different format other than the default format. Part of the issue is that we just assume that kids have "grown up" with computers so they do not need basic skills taught in elementary and middle school. They might catch on faster than older generations, but the basics still have to be taught. They aren't.

    27. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's some nice overestimating IT's skills, and/or underestimating everyone not you. Don't know where you work, but where I am, at least 2/3rds of people here can take care of most things.

      For the few things we can't, we call in a specialist, and pay him for his two hours of work or whatever. Note: He will not be paid thousands for these two hours. Because if we really wanted, at least half of us know people who CAN do it, and would jump at the chance to get paid a hundred bucks to come in when they have some free time.

      Those that barely know how to use a computer? They either learn damn quick, or they're fired and replaced by someone who can.

      Either accept that you're less valuable, or find an occupation where you are. You're like the RIAA... not realizing that you're becoming less and less relevant.

    28. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool story, bro

    29. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in support (specialised). I deal with people daily trying to put out fires, or having to tell them that no they won't be getting a fix for the issue. Yet I have calm users when I end the call. I have even had emails to my boss praising me, even in cases where we could not give them a solution.

      You know who puts food on my table? My customers, which is the end user. Calling them "lusers" means your part of the problem.

      Perhaps you should examine why they are shouting at you.

    30. Re:It's An Employer's Market by mjwalshe · · Score: 0

      Realy I had a Multimedia developer a recent graduate say to me when discussing audio for MM oh 3db's not that much. 3Db is actualy more than twice.

    31. Re:It's An Employer's Market by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Where is this elusive species to be found in quantity?

      They're mostly to be found in those unimpressive resumes. You know the ones... very light on experience, not compellingly presented, and really poorly laid out. The ones which you (or your recruiting firm) promptly threw in the trash... That was them.

      That was me 5+ years ago... Knowing more than most experts about everything from the ground up, but barely out of college, with just a bit of PC Tech experience which just didn't quite match-up with the check-list supplied to HR of any particular IT position.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    32. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when there's nobody you CAN communicate with due to contract bullshit.

    33. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Moryath · · Score: 1

      I have stood by watching subordinates get treated this way, by those who didn't realize I was nearby. I have seen overly entitled-feeling "users" go so far as to insist that (for example) the tech go to THEIR house, and work on THEIR personal computer and THEIR personal network, on the tech's personal time, to try to resolve an issue with telecommuting that was clearly the result of their own bloody incompetence (and possibly also that of the install tech or "good friend" they had set up their home network).

      Let's be clear here: I am speaking of a large number of users who, by the time someone walks in their door, are already being abusive. They are this way because upper/middle management feels somehow that treating IT personnel as if they were the aforementioned "corporate slave" or "house n****r" is an appropriate way to behave. And this comes from situations that are sometimes business-serious (in which case we will do everything in our power to get a resolution as expeditiously and correctly, concepts that are regrettably sometimes somewhat mutually exclusive, as possible) and are sometimes "you've got to be shitting me, grow the fuck up" situations.

      I have seen emails in which an entire department of personnel was accused of "never having anything work" and "never doing their jobs" because someone didn't have a body in the door within 5 minutes of a direct email (which violated proper contact policy anyways) about their fucking game not working during their lunch break, during a time when there was a major cleanup in process due to a boob one floor down not following proper safety practices and letting a worm loose. That's the kind of shit I am speaking of.

      Are IT personnel supposed to behave in a professional manner? Hell yes. Does that mean that treating them with disrespect is ok? Hell no.

    34. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Right up until they jam the printer, or come up with a document with nonstandard margins, or do 1001 other things that the lusers always do.

      I don't need help printing because a) I'm not retarded and b) I rarely print anyway. I mostly agree with your other stuff, although I do make a point of talking to the guy who cleans the office after hours.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    35. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Your trucking company will also need mechanics to fix the trucks and, if they're big enough, those mechanics will be in-house. Sort of an analogy to the IT guys.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    36. Re:It's An Employer's Market by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a cool story and at least 3 people with mod points thought so too.

    37. Re:It's An Employer's Market by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      They don't even teach how things really work any more in universities, there are no longer any assembly classes or the like and the lowest level you get is .net

      I say this as a twenty something who has went out of his way to learn things to the lowest detail before he got there, and is sorely disappointed at some of the content, the tutors apparently think I should be in engineering, not IT.

    38. Re:It's An Employer's Market by ejasons · · Score: 1

      3Db (sic) is actualy (sic) more than twice.

      Though, to be fair, while it is, indeed, roughly twice the actual level, the perceived difference is considerably more minor...

    39. Re:It's An Employer's Market by coreb · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see how those 20-something will use their up-to-date skills when faced with my 80% cobol environment.

      I've taught myself RPG (III and IV), and there's a COBOL compiler on the same machine. Give me a little time and I'll handle it just fine ;)

  28. yeah... by Sir_Real · · Score: 1

    No bonuses or raises, yet we somehow managed to come up with enough money to pay Oracle for a weblogic license. We don't host any apps that require anything more than jsp and servlets. We use spring instead of j2ee. It's fucking absurd.

    1. Re:yeah... by spydum · · Score: 1

      capex vs opex, but still, I see that same problem happening so often it's ridiculous. Servlet engine vs fully enterprise app server.. it's like a sledge hammer on a thumbtack.

  29. But boss, I'm drinking coffee for your sake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole reason I'm drinking coffee is to stay awake and work. Caffeinated workers are more productive.

  30. Get a union. by mantis2009 · · Score: 1

    Unionized workers have more benefits. Period.

    1. Re:Get a union. by PerfectionLost · · Score: 1

      Its true. I've also never seen or known of a unionized IT sector. Up to this point we have been paid too well. The low end IT salaries are above the poverty line by atleast 20k.

    2. Re:Get a union. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? The poverty line has been increasing steadily while low end IT jobs still pay the same or less.
      There are some guys where I work that are paid salary, but if you look at their hourly rate it is barely above minimum wage. Some weeks it is BELOW minimum wage. They are not in the actual IT department (which consists of one whole person), but pretty much everybody in my company that actually works is part of the information technology effort.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:Get a union. by M8e · · Score: 3, Funny

      More than ionized workers?

    4. Re:Get a union. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "The low end IT salaries are above the poverty line by at least 20k."

      So is the low end salary of nurses, doctors, lawyers. Your point?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Get a union. by PerfectionLost · · Score: 1

      My point is that the poverty line in America is well above a good wage in many countries by a factor of 2 or 3. Normalization has to happen at some point, and it is a good wage. ~50k a year can run you a big house in most of the country, a posh apartment with a lavish lifestyle in most of the rest of the country, and a dingy hole in NY like every other NY resident. I'm also talking about the bottom line here.

      Also, anyone who says they are making less than minimum wage in the IT sector needs to manage their time better. Either get a business degree, or find someone who has one and work for them until you figure out how to be profitable.

    6. Re:Get a union. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm

      right they have the benefit of looking for a new job or continuing to pay a group of extortionist to keep their current one.

      I will never join a union. Maybe that's because i am smart enough to negotiate my own contract.

      If I loss my job at no fault of my own I have a years salary waiting for me. I have 100% health coverage. I have a 3 week vacation.

      I guess the job market is like life. If your smart enough to make yourself inherently valuable then you get to make the rules.

      Otherwise your just some whore in need of a pimp

    7. Re:Get a union. by TermV · · Score: 1

      What are you saying, IT jobs should be paying close to the poverty line? You don't think that the skills and knowledge an IT worker possesses is worth $20k more than the poverty line? Even a low end IT work requires considerably more knowledge and training than somebody flipping burgers or mopping floors.

    8. Re:Get a union. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poverty line is a joke, it's based on food prices that are subsidiezed and does not take into account housing and energy. 2x the poverty level is the way most programs around here measure things. I make a good wage and I'm not above that for this area and my family size.

  31. Bonuses....? by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

    What are they?

    How 1980's. Only incompetent bankers get bonuses these days.

    I remember working for some prick who actually said "your bonus is still having a job" in a meeting once; well actually my bonus was leaving them and getting paid 15k more elsewhere.

    --
    #include <sig.h>
  32. We like our coffee! by Krissie12345 · · Score: 1

    Fortunately at the promotional products company where I work we still have our machine, it's a good job for us all that the management like the coffee!

  33. The coffee will come back by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Coffee produces proven improvements in productivity in the morning. It's well worth the minuscule cost of providing it, especially since it is usually shit (although you can actually get good coffee for the same price, or less. very sad.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:The coffee will come back by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Coffee produces proven improvements in productivity in the morning."
      myth.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:The coffee will come back by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Anecdote.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  34. Coffee by jschmitz · · Score: 0

    We have Starbucks coffee (the ground kind) at my work Verona and Breakfast blend - although our capex and opex expenses were like 40mm last year so I don't think they are too worried about coffee

    1. Re:Coffee by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying your company is like this, but several companies I have worked for have had similar gourmet coffees, and yet, for those of us who can't stand coffee, but still enjoy caffeinated beverages, we have to pay our own way. Fortunately, the company I work for now supplies free soda, but most companies I have worked for have always had free coffee, but not free soda.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:Coffee by jschmitz · · Score: 0

      Oh we have free sodas too - but it is up to the individual manager if he orders them or not its not company wide - we have some heavy Dew drinkers on our team = )

  35. Among the Dumbest Things to Do by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    Making the workplace less pleasant is only going to backfire. If I was running a company I would make the place as nice as possible so my workers would want to stick around for as long as possible. The highest cost to almost any company is labor. Since IT workers are often paid on a salary basis, free coffee and even free dinner is a bargain for the extra work I can get out of them. Many tech companies do this. Cutting 401k, laying off some people, or hiring less people are one thing but making the work environment unpleasant simply has a bad return on "investment". You save peanuts on the actual cost and lose way more on productivity. Also, as another commenter pointed out, people will work as hard as they think is due. When you start nickel and dime-ing your workers, they'll do the same back. Don't expect "above and beyond" type of effort when you don't seem to be doing the same for them.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  36. If I didn't by Stargoat · · Score: 1

    If I didn't have free coffee with unlimited and unfiltered access to the Internet at work, I would need to find another job.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    1. Re:If I didn't by MattSausage · · Score: 1

      And would you bring that up in an interview at your new prospective employer?

      Interviewer: "Well Stargoat, the interview has gone well, do you have any questions for me?"
      Stargoat: "Actually just one, do you have free coffee? And an unfiltered internet that I can browse at my leisure while I'm at work, regardless of what type of site it may be? Sometimes you can get some great coding ideas from seeing how youjizz.com implements their flash video player."
      Interviewer: "Ah.. well, don't call us, we'll call you."

  37. No worries about the coffee: by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can always fit a small refrigerator inside of a std. rack (lay a couple of 2x4's across the bottom to hold it up, and make sure the rack doors are on it, front and back). Put your own coffee maker on top of it, and you're set. Tape a few Dell server front panels to the inside of the rack door while you're at it. If you're really into disguises, wire up a few LED's to those panels.

    Now if only there was a way to squeeze a big-screen TV in there... and no, not sideways.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:No worries about the coffee: by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      Vertical racks would work. Tell management that such an arrangement can increase downlink speeds by about 9.8 m/s^2

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:No worries about the coffee: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The auditors in our company would find that and rip us a new one if we tried that.

    3. Re:No worries about the coffee: by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      This actually exists as a product, albeit for use in the entertainment industry, which also uses 19" racks for a variety of applications.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    4. Re:No worries about the coffee: by KraftDinner · · Score: 1
    5. Re:No worries about the coffee: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that m/s^2 is not speed ? Everyone that did go to school know that... wait management ? sorry my bad.

    6. Re:No worries about the coffee: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And one as dense as yourself would know a thing or two about gravity.

    7. Re:No worries about the coffee: by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      So, you just need a rack with rollers then, roll a good one to the front and as they finish with it roll it to the back and replace the ... better... one.

    8. Re:No worries about the coffee: by TuaAmin13 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but my fridge is plugged into a rack PDU, which is of course running off UPS. So when the shit hits the fan, at least I have a refreshing drink.

      Another perk is that since the server room is access controlled, nobody takes my food.

    9. Re:No worries about the coffee: by rich_r · · Score: 1

      Or you could buy one designed to bolt right in!

    10. Re:No worries about the coffee: by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      I have a mostly full 42u rack (sun enterprise 5500) which took the spot of where my bar fridge used to be (got a broken seal so it went in the garage for a bit) seal just got fixed on the fridge

      Thanks to you I just measured the width of the fridge, a few mm under 19 inches, It is now going in my rack

  38. On the other hand... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    Try working for yourself and providing all those things. You'll soon realize that they're not all that cheap.

    Having worked both in large corps and now for myself, it's completely worth it to me to work for myself and try the best I can to provide all those things on my own. I have no worries of stakeholders. Just my family and my clients' happiness.

    But, I realize that not everyone likes or is even capable of working for themselves (not a slam - some people jut don't like to/won't/can't do any sort of administrative work that's necessary when you work for yourself).

  39. A simple cost vs benefit analysis by jockeys · · Score: 2, Interesting

    industrial coffee maker (can make enough coffee, continuously, for at least 20 people) - $242.07
    http://www.amazon.com/VPR-Commercial-12-Cup-Pour-Over-Warmers/dp/B000BN7W84/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=home-garden&qid=1262704523&sr=8-1

    cheap coffee (weeks supply for 20 people) - $14.50
    http://www.amazon.com/Folgers-Ground-Regular-PAG20015-Category/dp/B00006IDJO/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=home-garden&qid=1262704605&sr=1-2

    coffee filters (months supply for 20 people) - $5.23
    http://www.amazon.com/BUNN-BCF250-Commercial-Coffee-Filters/dp/B0006VNO7Y/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&s=home-garden&qid=1262704669&sr=1-12

    so for about 250 initially and a monthly recurring cost of about 50 bucks. hmmm, 20 sleepy employees who are sluggish and inattentive for several hours a day (lets say 2 hours, or 1/4 of their shift). now, per employee that's a monthly cost of $2.50 to not diminish that 1/4 of their shift.

    how little would you have to be paying your employees to not think that's a good idea? pennies a day???

    furthermore, this isn't much of a cost cutting measure. even if I have 10,000 people working for me, I'm only paying $2500 a month to give them coffee (excluding the cost of the machines, which last a decade) or $30,000 per year, which is nothing for a 10,000 employee company.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:A simple cost vs benefit analysis by hattig · · Score: 1

      You make it seem so simple, and yes, it's a very low cost benefit for a business to operate that increases productivity, especially for night-owl IT workers who hate mornings.

      On the other hand, if the company is willing for you to do your own "coffee club" in such a situation: Find 19 co-workers, you each put in $15 up front ($300), and you've got coffee for a month, and then $2 each every week from then on.

      But if the company said that wasn't possible, and they wanted us to use the $1/cup coffee machine they want to install instead, I'll drink water instead, or bring coffee in a thermos. And I'll be less productive in the morning.

    2. Re:A simple cost vs benefit analysis by drspliff · · Score: 1

      Buying Folgers coffee would be a slap in the face. For $1 per person per day it's pretty easy to afford some good quality coffee, instead of brown vaguely coffee-esque tasting caffeinated hot water.

    3. Re:A simple cost vs benefit analysis by geekoid · · Score: 1

      very specific and very useless.
      You forgot about the pay for maintaining the coffee pot..

      If you can not do your job when yuou arrive, then maybe you should have a cup of coffee at your home when you wake up instead of thinking it's the companies responsibility to give you a product that's counter productive?

      That right, after 2 weeks of coffee drinking it's all useless because you brain makes more of the receptors that caffeine block(fill actually).

      if you have 10,000 people you will probably need to hire 50 people to maintain the coffee machines, product ordering, distribution and clean up.

      The machines aren't likely to last a decade, but the raw costs of the machine is pretty trivial compared to the human cost.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:A simple cost vs benefit analysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and why not some laxative to shit before coming to work - that's another 15mins saved.
      Also you should force feed yourself during breakfast so that you aren't hungry by lunch time (hey, it's only 3 hours away anyway).
      And you should pay for rollerskating lessons also because that saves time getting around the office.

      You're a cock.

    5. Re:A simple cost vs benefit analysis by garwain · · Score: 1

      Cost is not a linear function. Buying for 10,000 employees would be a hell of a lot cheaper per employee than buying for 20. A little careful shopping, and you could have a good supplier delivering the supplies for the coffee maker, and offering a huge discount for the volume you are purchasing. I've worked as a purcahsing co-ordincator for a few companys, one that had a total of 4 employees. For them, the caffeteria shopping involved one employee stopping at the convenience store once a week, and getting 2 bottles of water for the water cooler, one tin of coffee, and one carton of milk, then handing in the receipt. Another company had 180 employees in 3 locations, working 3 shifts. I got deals with both a major coffee distributer and a water distributer, where they delivered right into the caffeteria at each site, sent a bill the the head office every month, and thanked us regularly for our loyalty. That company was paying about 1/3 the cost per employee for stocking the caffeterias as the small one. Another site I worked at had vending machines on site, and after checking, I found I was spending close to $5 a day on coffee, where the company would have been paying closer to $1.50 for me to have consumed the same.

  40. I hope they're replacing the free coffee by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    with free Adderall.

    Otherwise productivity is going to plummet...

    1. Re:I hope they're replacing the free coffee by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Now there's an idea... Seriously.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  41. It's in the Constitiution by twmcneil · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's called the Juan Valdez Amendment to the Constitution. It's there really. Look it up. It guarantees all workers the right to free coffee during work hours. Ratification of that Amendment has been written into my employment contracts for over 20 years.

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
  42. coffee??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuk coffee! would you imagine, they REFUSED to return my pinball machine & minibar... started asking me for RECEIPTS - I tried explaining them that call girls erhhhm massage girls & drug dealers erhmm mobile pharmacies don't normally give those out but I don't think the message sunk in well. I'm thinking about retiring @ 35, what is this world coming to :((( i still have SO MUCH to give!

  43. Bureaucracy everlasting by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

    Many employers say they're going to continue trimming budgets, particularly in human resources.

    When I read this I thought "Hot damn, they're going to turf a layer or two of HR personnel. Bout time someone put those useless, meddling bastards up against the wall."

    But no. The writer meant get rid of bonuses and perks. Life is ephemeral, bureaucracy everlasting.

  44. Putting on the dick moves by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a firm believer that if a business wants to show it cares, it'll say it with money. Because that's the only thing that matters to a business. if it's parting with cash in ways it does not absolutely have to, that says something. But barring that, there's cashless ways to show care. There's not much you can do if you're doing IT-as-a-service where you need to be available for fixed hours but if you're doing dev work that doesn't go on a fixed schedule, give flex time! You worked late during the week, take a half day Friday. Costs the company nothing, same amount of work is getting done. Need a dr's appointment? For the love of xod, we're not going to ding you four hours of vacation time for it.

    I don't really get the silly stuff like pool tables and video games. That just seems like prolonging time spent at work and in a non-productive fashion. I would put more of a premium on getting the max amount of work done in the shortest possible time so people can go home. Quality of life is about having a life outside the office. In-house masseuses, catered lunches every day, that seems a little wasteful. But cutting 401k, cutting fucking coffee? Major dick moves.

    Employers are doing it because it's an employer's market out there. But rest assured, these employers will reap what they sow. The best employees are always the most mobile employees. If your best feel dicked over or if there's even the slightest concern about company stability, they will be out the door in a heartbeat. And it's now accepted in IT culture that you will NEVER make more money at the same employer. The only way to raise your pay is to move to another organization because your current one will never justify paying more for the person they already have, no matter if you're learning new skills, taking on more work, or improving the bottom line.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:Putting on the dick moves by assertation · · Score: 1

      Employers are doing it because it's an employer's market out there. But rest assured, these employers will reap what they sow. The best employees are always the most mobile employees. If your best feel dicked over or if there's even the slightest concern about company stability, they will be out the door in a heartbeat. And it's now accepted in IT culture that you will NEVER make more money at the same employer. The only way to raise your pay is to move to another organization because your current one will never justify paying more for the person they already have, no matter if you're learning new skills, taking on more work, or improving the bottom line.

      I'm guessing that some CEO types think that they can always give the job to some highly trained but desperately poor person somewhere via outsourcing so if their current employees don't like too dam bad.

    2. Re:Putting on the dick moves by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      But barring that, there's cashless ways to show care.

      Yeah, maybe they can let you park in that close parking space next to the CEO's space... for a month.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  45. Perks? by ez151 · · Score: 1

    Seriously you guys get perks AND free coffee at work?

  46. Coffee? by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    The only free coffee I get is what I steal from my co-workers thermos.

    --
    The game.
  47. Uncle Bernie once took away our coffee by kobotronic · · Score: 1

    http://www.thestreet.com/story/10008505/1.html

    It killed office morale quite effectively. Productivity plummeted. And Uncle Bernie still went to Club Fed even if he did save the company several hundred dollars worth of coffee expenses.

    1. Re:Uncle Bernie once took away our coffee by jnaujok · · Score: 1

      I was there at the time (as a consultant -- for one more month, before they cut all the consultants) and the employees were all furious. They basically quit even trying to get work done after Bernie cut the coffee. It still amazes me how shocked everyone was about how WorldCom was a steaming heap of ****, when everyone in the entire company knew that Bernie Ebbers was a crook and that the entire company was circling the bowl from the moment he took over.

      I still remember our first meeting with a WorldCom group that did their network alarm tracking using an Access database and Excel. He was so proud of their system that handled 200,000 alerts a day.

      I just looked at him and said, "Yesterday, we did twenty-two million alert and performance messages. It was a slow day."

      It was like an elementary school flag football team trying to play a game in the NFL.

      --
      Life, the Universe, and Everything... in my image.
  48. Coffee? Give me my damn heat back. by nitefallz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We lost free coffee a very long time ago, along with 401k contributions, bonuses, etc. On the cutting block this year besides staff and salary? HEAT. Originally each department was able to manage their own temperature within a 4-5 degree range. That's been taken away and the entire temperature for the company has dropped to the point where virtually everyone is wearing a jacket or thick sweaters in each of the departments. There's a good number of people across the hall wearing fingerless gloves. It's one thing to not be able to work efficiently by not having that caffeine kick, but shivering and not feeling your fingers is a real productivity stopper, let a lone the looming paycut.

  49. At my three letter named firm by gelfling · · Score: 1

    We're on year 10 or 11 of the obligatory "Business is GRRRRREEAAAAATTT!, you have to do without and you should be thrilled you have a job at all..." speech. My career plan is mostly made up of planning to listen to management about the importance of career planning. They stopped paying for training years ago, they don't pay for annual certificate membership dues, they don't even pay for broadband for at-home workers.

  50. it was never free by nottheusualsuspect · · Score: 1

    You insensitive clod! We have to pay for water! but only because the water from the spigot is contaminated from the diesel tanks that used to be here. Petroleum-flavored water? Count me out.

    1. Re:it was never free by russotto · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod! We have to pay for water! but only because the water from the spigot is contaminated from the diesel tanks that used to be here. Petroleum-flavored water? Count me out.

      Oh, stop whining. Just separate it and you get free diesel AND free water.

  51. Dilbert has predicted it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2003-07-11/

  52. Well, in my day... by jlowery · · Score: 4, Funny

    we mixed a little dirt in a cup of cold water and called it instant. If you wanted creamer, you added drop or two of Liquid Paper. Tasted like shit, but the extra chemicals and minerals kept you going.

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  53. Bail on them idiots! by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Work for a company that wasn't so stupid with their money during the gravy years. If they are resorting to such ignorant behavior, then they don't have a clue anyway, so better off getting a better job elsewhere.

    Place I work isn't even considering any of these stupid options - employee morale is better than I've seen anywhere else I've ever worked. Still have great insurance with a great match, bonuses, travel, etc. Free coffee is so good here that the Starbucks that used to be in the building closed because nobody was buying their stuff. (And replace the Starbucks area with a FREE arcade!)

    Anyone who says the only point of a company is to please their stockholders is a soulless idiot fascist.

  54. Forced Overtime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget Coffee. What about forced overtime with no extra pay. My company required 50 hour work weeks with 40 hours of pay. They claim they will give out a bonus if we hit our milestone, but they set the bar so high it's really just legal cover.

    This is the new economy folks -- same as the old economy circa 1914. Get used to it.

  55. Not the CEO, it's the MBA boss in charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the time this backfires, the MBA cuckoo will be out in search of another nest, having proven his savings to the company.

    1. Re:Not the CEO, it's the MBA boss in charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone on /. should take it as their civic duty to sponsor a student in an Indian MBA program...
      what's good for the goose is even better for the gander

  56. No more coffee? Finally! by Asylumn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Taking away the free coffee in my office would be considered a benefit. An act of mercy, really. It is a vile substance that resembles coffee in name only.

  57. Hills Brothers High Yield... ROTGUT by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1
    Not sure what other places use, but the last 3 places I've worked all put this stuff (it may also be labeled HB Institutional or some such way)... 5 minutes on the burner and this stuff turns black as used motor oil. gaack.

    I drink it anyway. It's free.

    Bennies taken away.... company phones are gone now. Comp time's all but dead. Don't get me started.

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  58. Overtime Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you review the federal pay laws, most computer based jobs don't receive overtime pay. They call it salaried but states are losing revenue as well as the feds for enacting such an insane law.

  59. They need you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are worth your salt in IT you can get free coffee and much more...
    If you are a GOD you can generate coffee from your ass.

    I perk delicious coffee.

    1. Re:They need you by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Hey, it's tubgirl!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  60. Did no one read Peopleware? by brney · · Score: 1

    Because we've been down this road before. Cutting employee benefits and perks earns you lower productivity, poor morale, a high turnover rate (which will cost a business more than free coffee ever will), the loss of talented workers, and at worst the retention of desperate incompetents who can't find a job anywhere else.

  61. I agree. Mostly. by Petersko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Every job is different. Every career is different. Things ebb and flow. For a long time, IT workers were spoiled primadonna. Now they're just another cost center. Guess what, the economy is jacked up. Budget cuts have to happen. IT is a necessity, but so is efficiency, cost control, etc. Welcome to the real world you big f'ing crybabies."

    I'm dramatically overpaid for what I do if you look at it from a day-to-day effort perspective. I do my work, but my dad is a heavy duty mechanic, and I'm a chair jockey. I make twice what he does, and he puts in an honest day's effort every single day. It's not fair.

    But I'm a troubleshooter by nature, and every once in a while I pull a large rabbit out of the hat and save the day in a big way. I like to think that closes the gap between contribution and compensation a bit.

    But I'm posting this from work...

    1. Re:I agree. Mostly. by GooberToo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hope this joke puts things into perspective for you.

      A factory has a major problem that closed their manufacturing line. A consultant is brought in. The Consultant wanders around the factory floor, listening, poking. Finally, he takes out a small hammer and taps gently a few times on one particular piece of machinery. The factory line roars back to life, production once again in progress. The factory managers are ecstatic.

      A week later, the factory recieves the invoice from The Consultant. The price was $900 for less than one hour of work. The factory's business people fumed and asked The Consultant for an explanation. The Consultant offered to send in an itemized invoice. The business people said, "yes, please do."

      A second invoice arrived. It had two line items. Item 1 was, "Rectifying Problem with Hammer Hit....$1" Item 2 was, "Knowing Where to Hit the Hammer....$899"

    2. Re:I agree. Mostly. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Ahhh. A breath of fresh air. Respect. Respect for other people is so rare these days. The closest I ever came to committing an unjustified homicide, was when some fool just dismissed me, my opinion, and my right to exist, because "I make 10 times what you make!" Freak.

      Keep that grip on reality. It will serve you well.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:I agree. Mostly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh. A breath of fresh air. Respect. Respect for other people is so rare these days.

      And yet, you yourself lack such respect. Fascinating.

    4. Re:I agree. Mostly. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that no longer holds true today when anyone can say:

      http://www.google.com/?q=where+do+I+hit+this+machine+to+fix+it

      And likely will get a legitimate response.

      Now days, you're consultant generally sends one bill like that, and the next time around they call someone else who doesn't have his head so far up his ass.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:I agree. Mostly. by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Its a joke with a morale. Seemingly, you failed to laugh or learn the lesson; from which there is no escape. Much of what companies pay for in outside expertise is non-tangle skills or even validation of what they already know. Its all in the know-how or even the authority of the know-how.

      The applicable examples are everywhere if you only look. Next time you visit your General Practitioner, make sure you tell him to remove his head from his ass before he sees you. More than likely you're paying him to validate what you already know and to simply provide indirect access to his Rx pad. In this example, you're paying a large office visit bill (directly or indirectly) for the simple ability to obtain a piece of paper with a couple of scribbles on it so you can then take it to another professional who will simply hand you a bottle. In both places of this knowledge-fest, you're paying a premium for that "know-how".

      Given your rebut, none exist who have their heads shoved farther up their ass then your GP and pharmacist.

    6. Re:I agree. Mostly. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I'm dramatically overpaid for what I do if you look at it from a day-to-day effort perspective.

      Who cares how hard you work? It's all about value produced.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:I agree. Mostly. by the_enigma_1983 · · Score: 1

      Its a joke with a morale.

      Odd, my joke's never have morale.

  62. Getting... Laid... off... by happy_place · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My kids think the day I came home with office furniture, boxes of office supplies, company teeshirts, and random promotional paraphenalia as one of the best days of Daddy's working life. It was like Christmas to the kids for each of them to get a lucite paperweight with our latest chip in it. Of course, unbeknownst to them, it was the day the company folded, and I was laid off. Still kinda cracks me up... it's all about how you look at things, as to whether they're they end of the world, or just a new world of adventure. :)

    --
    http://www.beanleafpress.com
    1. Re:Getting... Laid... off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every day's like that for me, except for the getting laid off part. And what's with the expression "everything that isn't bolted down"? You just need these things called "ratchet sets".

  63. You get back what you invest in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey CEO, wake up. There is a shortage in new IT workers. Nobody wants to work for you anymore, so they aren't studying for CS. It doesn't appear to be worth the degree. Bad coffee isn't a perk. No retirement fund? They could do better by building roads or being a cop. Studying hard so they can start working for you is not an attractive option. Wake up.

  64. Why doesn't someone start an IT WORKERS UNION? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject-line, & I have always wondered why this has not occurred. It seems to be the only way that the working fellow has against the "KORPORATE AMERIKA OVERLORDS" really time and again throughout U.S. History.

    1. Re:Why doesn't someone start an IT WORKERS UNION? by aembleton · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be someone else who starts something. Why don't you go ahead and do it?

    2. Re:Why doesn't someone start an IT WORKERS UNION? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know nothing of how this would be done is why. All I do know is, that it apparently NEEDS to be done (because as-per-usual, & perhaps now more than ever, because the working stooge is becoming more & more of a slave @ the mercy of masters who are so full of greed and so little loyalty to their own people, it is outright astounding). Perhaps it is something I should look into, but, I suspect (like most all else today) that it will require monies &/or connections I just do not possess (as well as experience in this area). Sorry...

    3. Re:Why doesn't someone start an IT WORKERS UNION? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could ask you the same.

  65. IT is now a Clerical, not Professional job by xanthos · · Score: 1

    Well it was a nice run while it lasted. Current cortporate management thinking is that IT positions are now considered clerical, not professional like they used to be.

    Don't think so? Then ask yourself this question, "Who do I report to?"

    If the answer is a Director or an Officer, then congratulations you are still considered a professional, for now.
    If it is a Manager, then you might still be considered a professional, but watch your back.
    If it is a Project Manager or a Team Lead, sorry you are clerical.

    By lowering your status management can lower your pay, benefits and advancement opportunities.

    They also are shooting themselves in the foot since they are probably also sacrificing creativity for slavish adherence to standardized processes.

    You will not get rich by working for someone else, but you may be able to live comfortably.

    -Xanthos

    --
    Average Intelligence is a Scary Thing
    1. Re:IT is now a Clerical, not Professional job by Turzyx · · Score: 1

      From the business' perspective, IT is just another resource.

      When times are good, you get free coffee.
      When time are bad, you get your genitals squeezed.

      Reading the article, the statements made apply to all employees, not just IT workers. If you hadn't already realised that the global financial situation was going to be used as an excuse to bust your balls, then welcome to 2007.

  66. Change your focus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you are in the wrong sector of IT.

    My job --> Identify, evaluate and remove corporate waste with through system integration\migration coupled with automated process engineering (workflow).

    I drink coffee at home.

    Sr. Software Engineer - 28yrs Exp.

  67. Wait, I could have had perks? by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    While more companies are coming back to having thier own IT department, many still contract. Shoot, I have to PAY into a benefits package to get sick time, and certainly don't get vacation. The company I am contracting to does not have free coffee - shoot I just paid two bucks down in the cafeteria to get some nasty overcooked Starbucks stuff (hence why it was two bucks instead of $5), and its way better than the toilet water that is in the pay coffee machine in the hall. But I have a job right now in an otherwise troubled economy, so I am not complaining too much. But free caffinee would be AWESOME! That and to get hired on directly so I can get some PTO, Vacation, and some medical benefits that don't cost me half a weeks salery.

    1. Re:Wait, I could have had perks? by DarkAce911 · · Score: 1

      I used to work contract until I got the full-time gig, I wonder what Obama-care is going to do to the sector. It could totally screw it over or fix a lot of problems with it. Healthcare was my biggest worry, vacation and the rest didn't really matter that much.

    2. Re:Wait, I could have had perks? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you work, but in general IT isn't hurting that much. Several companies in this area learned that the hard way when toy cut perks and there staff got new jobs in about a week.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  68. Re:Coffee? Give me my damn heat back. by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    We lost free coffee a very long time ago, along with 401k contributions, bonuses, etc. On the cutting block this year besides staff and salary? HEAT. Originally each department was able to manage their own temperature within a 4-5 degree range. That's been taken away and the entire temperature for the company has dropped to the point where virtually everyone is wearing a jacket or thick sweaters in each of the departments. There's a good number of people across the hall wearing fingerless gloves. It's one thing to not be able to work efficiently by not having that caffeine kick, but shivering and not feeling your fingers is a real productivity stopper, let a lone the looming paycut.

    I didn't think Scrooge & Marley llp was that big an operation.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  69. Want to work somewhere better? by Surt · · Score: 1

    If you're an excellent java software engineer in silicon valley, we still have plenty of free coffee, and our perks are on the rise. Get in touch with me if you're interested.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:Want to work somewhere better? by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't you have added you're A++++ employer with 4-inch increased capacity mugs to your ad?

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    2. Re:Want to work somewhere better? by Surt · · Score: 1

      No, you probably want to supply your own mug. We supply paper cups to avoid the risk of poisoning you with lead.

      And while we may not be a A++++ employer (not sure what that is actually), we do employ multiple 5 digit slashdotters, which to my mind is a pretty awesome recommendation.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Want to work somewhere better? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Same thing in Portland. Hell I know a place the gives it's employees free beer..Good beer on tap.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Want to work somewhere better? by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Yea, that A+++ was an EBay ref.

      And, I would say having 5 digit slashdotters couldn't be a bad thing.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  70. Keep your coffee.... by Itninja · · Score: 1

    ....I'd be happy with COLA. I have not have one since September 2008, and won't be getting one in 2010 either.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  71. Sad when training is considered a perk by Rastl · · Score: 1

    We've had no training budget for the last 2 years and I don't know that we're getting one this year. That means no real technical training, no certifications, nothing to keep current and improve our skills.

    Talk about short sighted. I expect an exodus of the top talent in the near future if there's nothing in the budget this year. They managed tiny raises for us this year and I'm not complaining about that at all. But a third year without any investment in training is going to be hard to overcome.

  72. Been there done that. by knuckledraegger · · Score: 1

    In my old spot ( a bank), we kept drinks cold under the raised floor, added a tuner card to a server and hijacked cable from the board room. We could view breaking news as needed and football games or whatever during system backups. Armed guards brought us all the coffee we could drink. No one could disturb our habitat without our written permission. Life was good.

  73. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about a post that would draw the ire of every IT person that reads /. ...lol
    I found myself foaming at the mouth before I even finished it...
    If employers treat their employees like sh*t they'll get the resulting amount of loyalty such treatment breeds.
    Once the employee is trained and up to speed they start looking for a new job that treats them better and when they leave the short sited
    company that they were trained at, that company eats the cost of providing a trained employee to a competitor, it's a brilliant strategy designed to shore up the bottom line while chopping off their own foot/leg (insert corporate bodypart here). Most company management used to be smart enough to look at the big picture not the 1-3yr picture which is about how long a typical CEO's position lasts.

  74. Bad Coffee? Speak for yourself. by mad.frog · · Score: 1

    At my company, the coffee's still free, and it's still Peet's. (Bay Area readers know what I'm talkin' about: yummy, yummy rocket fuel.)

    1. Re:Bad Coffee? Speak for yourself. by sproingie · · Score: 1

      Same here: Peets coffee, bagels on mondays, fresh fruit on tuesdays and wednesdays. They did cut down on the travel and bumped up the teleconferencing. Except for getting to travel a few of the nicer European offices, that's actually kind of a bonus.

      Just keeping the loyalty of a handful of critical engineers can really make or break a tech company that depends on actual innovation and research. They'd be stupid to drop any of these small perks.

    2. Re:Bad Coffee? Speak for yourself. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Peet's is horid. It's like Starbucks for people who don't want to be seen going into Starbucks.

      Gah.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  75. Supreme Court Disagrees by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

    Contrary to popular belief, a company's sole responsibility is NOT to its shareholders;

    In the US, you'd actually be wrong about that. The Supreme Court disagrees with you in Dodge v. Ford Motor Company - funny name, I know. According to Wikipedia:

    The Court held that a business corporation is organized primarily for the profit of the stockholders, as opposed to the community or its employees.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    1. Re:Supreme Court Disagrees by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Hmm, perhaps you should read that more closely. The "primarily" bit in there makes your whole "you'd be wrong about that" wrong. Particularly since the GP actually used the word "sole".

  76. Sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly, much of business has become populated by those "educated" (in name only) to understand the cost of everything, but the value of nothing.

  77. investment in training ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We've had no training budget for the last 2 years and I don't know that we're getting one this year. That means no real technical training, no certifications, nothing to keep current and improve our skills"

    Have you considered moving to Linux, once you learn the base technology then your skills are virtually futured proof and your certifications don't expire with the next version of whatever ..

  78. The pendulum... by dghcasp · · Score: 2, Funny

    The pendulum swings one way, then back the other...

    Side 1: "If I can't wear sweat pants, bring my dog to work, have my own office, telecommute when I feel like it, and drink company-provided beer every day starting at 3:00, then I won't work here."

    Side 2: "You're 35 and you haven't had a heart attack yet? Perhaps I should replace you with someone who actually works hard."

    1. Re:The pendulum... by nauseum_dot · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points. I haven't laughed so hard, out loud in the last couple of years.

      --
      Crap! I just kissed my karma good-bye.
  79. TFA is from "Channel Insider"? by CodeBuster · · Score: 2, Informative

    TFA is a press hit from a PR firm people. Seriously, "Channel Insider"? They aren't even trying very hard to hide the fact that they are a bullshit marketing rag full of advertising copy, "special advertising sections" (you know the ones that try to disguise themselves as "articles" and actually useful content), and "articles" submitted by PR firms on behalf of paying clients to score a "Press Hit". I would put the credibility of anything coming out of "Channel Insider" at just about zero.

    1. Re:TFA is from "Channel Insider"? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Actually, marketing "rags" can have quite useful information in them. Trashing them just because they are what they are smacks of elitism. You do know that newspapers and such run press releases as articles all the time? In addition, many people don't mind reading PR articles because at least you know their bias and can account for it, unlike traditional journalism where the article is subtly slanted to match the journalist's preconceived notions.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  80. This post... by sean.peters · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... is a mixture of pure unsupported assertations, and anecdotes pretending to be data. Any evidence to show that "strikes hurt employees more through lost wages than they gain in negotiations"? In fact, there's a lot of history that shows that unions did, in fact, make lives better for not only their own workers, but for everyone - and not only in the form of wages, but also in things like medical benefits and safe working conditions. For example: the five day work week - brought to you by the AFL-CIO.

    Enough with the union bashing, already. Read a little history of the labor movement, and then see what you think.

    1. Re:This post... by Unlucke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Past performance is not an indication of future results.

      Just sayin'

    2. Re:This post... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Past success is not a guarantee of future performance.

    3. Re:This post... by RobDude · · Score: 1, Informative

      Like all of the Union auto workers making fat cash working in Detroit?

    4. Re:This post... by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      Yeah the unions made lives so much better that now the residents of Detroit get to live in post-apocalyptic heaven. The UAW is like a freaking cancerous leech on society.

    5. Re:This post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about you read a little history and stop reading your AFL-CIO propaganda.

      Unions didn't bring us medical benifits. Actually FDR's incredibly stupid salary caps and the corporations need to made an incentive for new workers (because they couldn't pay them more) did that.

      As for the weekend ... sorry but you need to thank good old religion for that(Christians on Sunday and Jews on Saturday). Hell even the 8 hour day was a British concept long before a union one.

      Unions can be thanked for missing bodies and closing plants, and of course NAFTA

    6. Re:This post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History is history. Thanks for the efforts, but now there are federal and state laws to make workplaces safer and anything over 40 hours paid at time and a half. In my lifetime, the only effect of unionization I've seen is getting the auto industries bail-outs due to those companies forced by strikes to provide decades of healthcare to employees and retires, pensions, and pay $80,000 a year for standing on the assembly line. Which, as a tax payer, I have to support financially despite the fact that as a young person who doesn't work on cars I have a snowball's chance in Hell of ever having a pension.

    7. Re:This post... by Uberbah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bullshit. The problems in Detroit are due to executive mismanagement and the lack of universal health care. But way to hate on your fellow workers, for daring to negotiate decent health insurance and retirement benefits.

    8. Re:This post... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Yes, unions have helped some things, they've also crushed entire industries with their ridiculousness, but you know, some of us DO know a little about the history of unions which apparently doesn't include you.

      Its nice that you pick out good things they've done while utterly ruining many many businesses and in the end resulting in massive amounts of unemployment.

      Unfortunately today's union simply doesn't quit demanding more crap, even after driving a company to unprofitability due to high wages and ridiculous work 'safety' crap.

      Read a little history about the companies that have went under, because of unions, that resulted in far lower wages for its workers, because you know, no incoming some income. Yea, unions get me paid more, and also Yea the union drove the company out of business resulting in me being unemployed with no hope of finding another job doing that sort of work since the market suddenly became flooded with people in EXACTLY my shoes.

      There are other ways to fix the problem, unions are a shitty example of a solution that are nothing more than the result of pure greedy and selfishness.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:This post... by farrellj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, actually. For those who still have jobs. Remember, those workers were not the ones designing crap quality cars, and paying hundreds of millions of dollars of bonuses to execs who basically did nothing but not do badly that year. One year's worth of exec bonuses at the Big 3 would pay for all of the benefits of the UAW workers for the next 10 years.

      ttyl
                Farrell

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    10. Re:This post... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Enough with the union bashing, already. Read a little history of the labor movement, and then see what you think.

      I do read a lot about Unions. Stuff like this: http://www.thenewstribune.com/opinion/story/296557.html

      It doesn't give me a very good impression. Despite that, I don't have anything against *voluntary* Unionization-- just don't expect me to join, I'd do a better job negotiating on my own.

      But my main objection with Unions is that it makes the employee and management into "opponents." Right now, I have a very friendly relationship with my management, and I understand and agree with the company's purpose. If I were in a Union, suddenly he would be considered an enemy for us to defeat and we'd have to fight for our benefits/pay every year.

      It's not really a big thing, just a subtle difference, but I'd much rather work with management with mutual respect than be their "enemy."

    11. Re:This post... by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

      My favorite thing is hearing a worker defend the corporations right to ban unions and why this is a good thing for workers... they think people will do nothing and sit around then get promoted ahead of them based on seniority!

    12. Re:This post... by kklein · · Score: 1

      Like all of the Union auto workers making fat cash working in Detroit?

      You mean the ones at Ford? Yeah. Toyota? Yeah. Honda? Yeah.

      Basically the ones working anywhere but GM, which was run into the ground by poor management are doing just fine, as are the companies they work for.

    13. Re:This post... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One perception is that the UAW is to be blamed for the automotive industry crisis of 2008-2009. This viewpoint cites union workers' higher wages and more generous benefits compared to those working at non-union Japanese auto plants in the U.S. as one of the primary reasons for the poor competitiveness of the Big Three. In a November 18, 2008, New York Times editorial, Andrew Ross Sorkin clamed that the average UAW worker was paid $70 per hour, including health and pension costs, while Toyota workers in the US receive $10 to $20 less.[14] The UAW asserts that most of this labor cost disparity comes from legacy pension and healthcare benefits to retired members, of which the Japanese automakers have none

    14. Re:This post... by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      One hundred years ago workers on strike cared about their jobs, their friends jobs, complete strangers jobs, jobs that hadn't even been created yet, benefits to people yet unborn, etcetera, etcetera. In today's society the majority of people couldn't give two shits about anyone but themselves. Unionisation only works when those involved care about more than the immediate benefits available to them and to them alone. By breaking society up and making people more distant from one another the powers than be have won a great victory.
      When i was a student I purposefully moved to an area that had very low rent ($23pw when the average around town for equivalent accommodation was $150pw) and the area was considered a poor, violent, nasty place to live, and was the brunt of many jokes. Living there for a few years was a great education. the first night an old lady from a couple of doors down turned up at the door with a pot full of fresh home made soup(it was delicious). Within a week I knew pretty much everyone that lived within a ten house radius. people were nice, kind, looked out for one another, and the majority generally cared about the welfare of others(even ones they hadn't met yet).
      I wonder if this is what Orwell meant when he wrote "If there was hope then it was in the proles"(paraphrased badly).

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  81. productivity down as ... by josepha48 · · Score: 1

    ... it workers leave the office to get coffee elsewhere. Figure a refill ever 2 hours and a 15 to 30 minute commute to a coffee shop depending on where you live they could regret that decision.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

  82. Rorschach Test : Adam or Niccolo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Management is more likely to subscribe to the Machiavelli Model than Adam Smith. Maybe it's more fun to knock the other guy down than working to build something. I'm pretty sure it pays better, but scruples always seem to get in my way.

  83. Oh okay, the math by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Regular filter coffee costs in a dutch chain (AH) about 2,50 for half a kilo. 400 euro would therefor buy you 80kg of coffee (ignoring for the moment bulk-discounts).

    There are on average 260 workdays in a year (not excluding holidays) 80/260 gives you three ounces of coffee a day. (And that is during working hours, an addict like this would drink all day)

    I think you would bounce.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  84. I had a choice... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    ... I could either get issued a company phone, or the company would pay my cell bill. There was no way I was carrying around two phones, and the company issued one was a giant clunky Blackberry, whereas my own was an iPhone. The choice was easy.

    1. Re:I had a choice... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      If the company is paying your cell bill, then they most likely have a legal right to read and audit any calls, emails, SMS, etc, that go across that device. This applies during any hours that that company pays for that phone to operate, which is likely 24/7. That choice was easy, and you should be carrying two phones.

  85. Re:Seattle's Best--- is not... by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    Yeah our company downgraded our coffee vendor and now it's not even worth going to the coffee room. Looks like a lot more Keurig sales and 'illegal' coffee machines in cubicles if you ask me...

  86. All you got to do is look outside the US by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unions work great in the rest of the world.

    Americans seem to have to wrong idea about what Unions are about. It has become a lethal fight in a system that basically says: The worker has no rights.

    In Holland unions work together and it is not unusual for the unions AND the employers to unite and tell the government to go screw it self. Like on wage freezes recently. The government said all wages (except its own oddly enough, an oversight I am sure) should be frozen and in some sectors employees and unions said that they had already sorted things out and wouldn't do it.

    ideally, government, employers and unions/workers should all work together to create a working society with give and take and the realization that just because you are on opposites ends of the negotiation table, that doesn't mean you have to be enemies with no common goals.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:All you got to do is look outside the US by oatworm · · Score: 1

      Blame the Wagner Act. Basically, back in the '30s, some politicians, business leaders, and labor leaders got a brilliant idea: What if there was some way we could reduce competition, thus providing more opportunities for businesses to profit, thus providing more profit to pass down to employees? The result was Wagner Act unionism, which took a decent idea (improve worker safety and compensation) and corrupted it to hell and back. Unions liked it because they could negotiate a set of work rules and compensation packages with one company, then go to other companies and demand the same package, all while legally requiring the other companies to negotiate with the union. Big corporations liked it because, if they were the top dog and doing well, they could negotiate with the union first and put together a compensation and work rules package that would put its competitors out of business (hence why Studebaker, Kaiser and AMC don't exist anymore and International doesn't sell pick-ups). Government liked it because it reduced competition and reduced the chances that severe deflation would happen like it did at the beginning of the Great Depression (25% deflation - eep), while also ensuring that they have a seat at the negotiating table (meaning they were in a position to be bribed). It was a win-win-win for "everyone".

      This system worked well enough for everyone's satisfaction until the '60s came. By then, though, the US wasn't the only country with an intact industrial base anymore (we were basically the world's China after World War 2), most other countries had newer industrial facilities (they had to build from scratch, so they could use more up-to-date tech than we could), and, oh yeah, everyone else enjoyed a much less "adversarial" labor-business climate, so labor costs were much lower. Once the world caught up to us, we were screwed.

      What's really frustrating is that we're proving right now that it's perfectly possible to profitably produce things in this country. Japanese, German, and Korean automakers have manufacturing and assembly plants all over the US. They also make it a point to negotiate with labor organizations on their terms and don't deal with labor organizations that insist on "keeping up with the Joneses" with regard to labor practices or compensation. The result is flexible workforces that actually get to keep their jobs and get to produce top-notch products, just like workforces in Europe and Asia.

    2. Re:All you got to do is look outside the US by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The problem with unions in the USA, from what I can see, is that they tend to be monopolies. In most of the rest of the world, you'll find two or three unions that a person can join. If one union isn't representing their interests, they are free to join (one of) the other(s). If a union has a monopoly then it has no incentive to work in the interests of its members because there's nothing that they can do. If it has competition then it needs to work, and be seen to be working, in the interests of its members or it will not be able to threaten industrial (in)action and so will lose its bargaining power.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  87. The Fate of Coffee by fm6 · · Score: 1

    shut off the free coffee (it wasn't that good anyway)

    Bad coffee is just an intermediate step. I worked at one Big Dot Com 11 years ago where the free coffee was Peet's, with the beans ground just before brewing. Came back to the same BDC 3 years ago, and they'd switched to the Sara Lee Coffee Service, which provides coffee not quite as good as what you get at a seedy donut shop. Then they replaced that with this obscene little single-serving dispenser that "brewed" something about as drinkable as instant.

    1. Re:The Fate of Coffee by driftingwalrus · · Score: 1

      Honestly, there's not a lot of value in cutting off the coffee anyway. On a per cup basis it's one of the cheapest beverages going. Some gas stations make more off the coffee than they do the gasoline.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    2. Re:The Fate of Coffee by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Corporations are dominated by bean counters. Literally!

  88. Coffee? COFFEE!!! by Bob+A+Trollmuncher · · Score: 1

    They can have my coffee when they take if from my cold dead trembling hands ! Seriously, in my workplace if they stopped supplying coffee there would be an immediate staff reduction due to the inevitable murderous rampage. I'd suspect it as a self enforcing workforce reduction plan, but I seriously doubt the bean counters are smart enough for a plan that cunning

    --
    come to the dark side, we have penguins.
  89. For a group of alledgedly smart people by geekoid · · Score: 1

    the ignorance of how the brain responds to caffeine is mind boggling stupid.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:For a group of alledgedly smart people by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try and get your learn on before making yourself sound like a jackass:

      The findings revealed increased activity in the frontal lobe, where working memory is centered, and the anterior cingulum, which controls attention, in volunteers after consuming 100 milligrams of caffeine, the equivalent of about two cups of coffee. These areas showed no increased activity when the subjects drank the same fluid without caffeine in it.

      "The increased activity means you are more able to focus," Koppelstaetter said. "You have more attention and your task management is better."

    2. Re:For a group of alledgedly smart people by RobDude · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could elaborate?

      The post above yours made the claim that "caffeine, in moderate doses, enhances mental focus".

      I've got a slew of scientific studies that support his claim, and then I've got some random guy on Slashdot saying, 'Pshhhh, your ignorance is mind boggling stupid!'

      Scientific studies.....vs.....insult throwing guy on Slashdot who offers no counter point.

  90. Minor correction by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Mac coders are centaurs that convert plant matter to mac code and horse shit...but I repeat myself~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  91. No kidding by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    I am currently in a new position with some juniors and... JUST WHAT DO THEY TEACH THEM IN SCHOOL THESE DAYS?

    I feared that as I got older I would find it harder as web developer. It has gotten easier. All I basically got to say is how many years I worked in IT as a programmer and I am on to the last round.

    Granted I live in europe and the recession is mostly limited to the US but still.

    People that say they will just replace experience with a trainee have never actually watched the results of such a move.

    Computers have in a way become so easy, often at school pre-installed with the tools that they got no clue what to do. Even simple things like installing an archive utility is beyond them. It is not so much that they are stupid, they just never had to think about it, and so never did.

    Because of my job switch I spoke to various recruiters and employers and they just can't find enough people right now. Even medior functions are hard to fill.

    Basically, in IT (at least the web development part of it), the recession just hasn't happened. If you are any good, there are plenty of jobs. Sadly, a lot of people just ain't any good. I see it all the time, web developers who still haven't caught the difference between frontend and backend. And who think Java is a browser language... and the same as javascript. Or that XML is HTTP.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  92. coincidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, I just replenished the pot before I read that.

  93. I got 25 paid days off by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not including official holidays.

    You want better working conditions? Then stop kowtowing to the man every chance you get.

    US (and british) companies have become VERY good at making employees think they are doing them a favor by employing them. It works great for them and allows them to fire people and make the rest glad they got a job in a recession that is SO bad not a SINGLE big company executive has had his/her bonuses cut. Odd that. 10% unemployment yet the bonuses for the top happen the same as before. Gosh I wonder where they got the money from. And all the rest of the sheep think is "well thank god it isn't my flesh the farmer is getting fat on". Probably because no sheep can think ahead to next year.

    You are willing to trade "perks" like free coffee (and really, if that is a perk you got amazingly low standards, is free toilet paper a perk as well? Free tap water?) for real free days. Great, that is smart thinking sheep. Just what they want, and next year, they change the traded for days back to forced days again.

    Years ago, when the company in the 21st century thought it was okay to turn vacation days into forced vacations, people should have walked out. They didn't.

    Oh and for a history lesson, find a SINGLE year in history in which companies have NOT had an excuse to make cutbacks on personal. The recession, 9/11, the bubble, Y2K expenses, crash of the yen, cost of the dollar... there is always a reason. Now find a SINGLE year in which any of these reasons have led to a salary reduction for the people deciding that their should be money saved.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  94. Are they insane?! by webdog314 · · Score: 1

    Let me see if I understand this: The company in question is getting rid of the ability to give it's employee's productivity enhancing drugs (which they are taking willingly) so that they can trim a little off the overhead? Times are tough, sure, but you would think management would want their employee's to work harder and longer, yes?

  95. Sounds like genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, this reminds me of another brilliant idea. Let's only hire inexperienced developers, network engineers, DBAs, and sysadmins. We'll save thousands of dollars a year on their salaries! Then, when the company implodes into the black hole created by an overwhelming mass of incompetence, executives can use their golden parachutes to land at a new company and do it all over again. Genius!

    1. Re:Sounds like genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all the job listings out there requiring strictly "7-10 years experience" or heck even "3-5 years experience", I don't think this is happening any time soon. If anything, the IT field and the software industry have pretty much a closed-door policy to entry-level people at the moment. I took up an English teaching job in Japan starting this summer because none of the HUNDREDS of software companies I contacted in the last year bothered to respond to my job application -- apparently "not experienced" translates into "completely incapable of doing the job", which isn't true in reality but is true within the irrational confines of human resources departments, where they care more about how much you know the syntax of the Language Flavor Of The Month rather than how well you know algorithm design and/or fundamentals of computer science. I only wish I had not bothered going to college if I knew this would happen, I could have saved five years of my life.

  96. Espresso not Coffee, a Recruitment tool by chelberg · · Score: 1

    Coffee not good? Not at the company I worked for. We had an espresso machine and it was wonderful. The company had one of the secretaries clean it and they bought coffee at the grocery store on their way in to work. But this was a small company. YMMV at large corps.

    One other point, while it may seem quite a small thing, it was a large recruitment incentive. Any company that cared enough to provide free espresso seemed like it might be a nice place to work. This turned out to be true for this company. I'm sure it got them better people than they might be able to attract with salary alone.

  97. I would list my job conditions by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    But that would be mean.

    It is funny, whenever you ask an American about their life style, they claim it is the highest in the world, that nobody got it as good as them.

    So please explain, what is so good about living like this? The hope that one day you will make it big? Amazing really. I honestly had this conversation with an American who worked 80 or so hours a week, so did his wife but they had this GREAT house with a big luxury home cinema setup... it never really entered his mind why I found it odd he wanted this, as I talked to him in Arnhem (holland) where he was stationed in an decent hotel but still a hotel for over a year now with only a short holiday around Christmas...

    Anyway, if you are contracting don't you just put all the expenses like medical benefits in your hourly rate? Or do you actually think it is smart to contract for the same hourly wage that regular workers make? That doesn't sound like a long term plan.

    Sing along now:

    All I am saying, is give socialism a chance.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  98. B and S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IF they were so up tight about cutting costs why not cut $4000+ annually by not buying sales reps and executives gym memberships, green fees, and other "networking essentials". The $500 they spend on Folgers coffee annually is rather spurious since dozens if not hundreds of staff members can at least enjoy a cup of coffee. This cost cutting is bullshit every time. The first bonuses to go are at the bottom, the last ones to go are at the top. When I go to a staff meeting, there is work to be done. When senior management goes to a meeting, there's bottled water, soda, coffee, Di' Amico catered lunch, EVERY FUCKING WEEK. Absolute bullshit every time. It just another measure to drive people out of IT so they can leverage a self-created job shortage to exploit cheap labor. Nothing like pioneering the digital sweat shop.

  99. So I take 25 minutes and goto store for coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get some air and sunshine. Have a smoke.

    Take the Hot Chick from accounting with me.

    I'm not seeing the down side.

  100. Free coffee? No thanks. by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

    In all honesty, with the quality of free coffee one would find in IT departments, I'd rather have no free coffee - I'm always buying or bringing my own coffee anyways. On the other hand - no free coffee means lower productivity. No really, it does. Ask Wally.

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
  101. Re:Fix your election laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in California, it's a misdemeanor to register for a Party that you disagree with. So if you want to change your party's platform, you must register as non-partisan.

  102. Tax on the Math Challenged by Tony+Freakin+Twist · · Score: 1

    I worked for US Bank as a consultant at one of their *gigantic* warehouse cube-farms. They had stopped providing free coffee at the many "coffee centers" in the building, which I found incredibly short-sighted. Coffee is fuel. Programmer + Coffee = Productivity. To acquire said fuel, it was necessary to take a 15 minute round trip hike to the cafeteria on the other side of the building - for which I, of course, charged the time. $100/hr x .25 = $25. I made money going to buy coffee.

    Canceling the Griswald X-mas bonus level stupidity - you're just going to end up kidnapped, tied up with a dog chain and presented to your employee wrapped in a ribbon. Everyone knows that.

  103. Oh, this is a big incentive... by driftingwalrus · · Score: 1

    This'll encourage all kinds of talented people to stay in IT, that's for sure. This combined with the bad pay and near infinite stress, and being woken up at 3AM become some developer was fiddling where he shouldn't be... Yeah, who wouldn't want to work in this field?

    --
    Paul Anderson
    "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
  104. You can't flip burgers for Americans in India by PerfectionLost · · Score: 1

    No no. I think 20k is great. 70+k over the poverty though... that is why this industry is getting outsourced to other countries. Hell, if anything you can't flip burgers in India for Americans. That almost makes that job more valuable.

  105. Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any particular reason that article was put in an annoying flash component?

  106. not so for the coffee by megabunny · · Score: 1

    I get free coffee, did at last job too MB

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  107. Goodbye company provided coffee service. by Pinback · · Score: 1

    They cut our coffee service at the end of the year, and the coffee makers have been hauled away.

    I had a promo vacuum bottle that I got at a sales meeting, and now I'll be carrying home coffee to the office.

    I want them to cut as many things as they can. It will make it easier to feel good about leaving when something better comes along.

  108. Re: quality of life at the workplace by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    Back when I had Goodall Computer Systems on 24th Street in San Francisco, I kept the freezer stocked with Jamaican Blue Mountain beans for the employees. I admit it was a little extreme, but the employees looked forward to coffee time, and knew I valued their work. Those were good times I remember fondly. Later when the company was run by an anal bean-counter, work was no longer fun. I guess it is what you value. If every penny is counted, and paper clips are inventoried weekly, that is going to be less fun. When there is a liberal supply of colored sharpies and tapeflags, it makes me happy. Each person finds satisfaction at work in different ways. If management wants software engineers to be exempt, and work 60 hours a week, the free coffee helps a lot.

  109. Can a single can of soda kill your company? Abslty by speculatrix · · Score: 1

    Can a single bottle of soda decimate your company? Absolutely.

    when I was a student engineer I worked at a division of Philips Electronics where no drinks were provided for free except water, there was a drink machine which wasn't too expensive (presumably to deter waste) - about 4 cents or 2 UKpence a cup. in one of the secure labs where only authorised people were allowed (high voltage and RF power) there was a clandestine kettle and tea/coffee kit, as kettles were not normally allowed due to "safety".
    A lot of time was lost due to engineers interrupting each other to change money for the machines, and quite frequently whole groups of people would gather to chat for quite a while. One day when the company passed an important test of quality (ISO9000 IIRC) the machines were set to "free" for a week as a reward. I noticed the number of people chatting dropped and productivity must have risen, far in advance of the cost of the coffee.
    I commented to a senior manager about that, and he somewhat agreed, but I don't think anything changed.

  110. Lack of ability to take PTO by Aero · · Score: 1

    I had a job where I got 25 days PTO, plus the standard holidays. I walked away from it to go become a government contractor.

    The problem was that I could barely take any of it. Six week-long software deployments each year, and effectively being unable to take time off for 2 weeks after each deployment (in case something went HORRIBLY WRONG), or the 2 weeks before the deployment (make sure that nothing affects the coders' ability to get their code changes in!)...do the math, that's 30 weeks that were pretty much unavailable. For the last 2 years I was there, I was pretty much capped out at 35 days of accumulated PTO and even started taking every other Friday off to stay under the cap. Finally after about 3 months of this, my manager practically ordered me to just take a week off and be done with it.

    In my exit interview, I named this as one of the primary reasons I was leaving. If companies are treating employees as "resources", then they need to properly schedule "maintenance downtime" for those "resources" just like they do for the servers and the switches.

    --
    We can believe in you for 3 minutes, but beyond that, even the King of All Cosmos can't be expected to wait.