Slashdot Mirror


Man Physically Assaulted At McDonald's For Wearing Digital Eye Glasses

RockoW writes "Steve Mann, a long-time researcher of computer vision systems, (i.e. Augmented reality, Digital Eyeglass) had an incident at a McDonald's in Paris, France. He was assaulted by three men during his visit to get food with his family. They had a problem with his digital eye glasses and tried to take them off his head. 'The eyeglass is permanently attached and does not come off my skull without special tools.' The men also tore up Mann's documentation and a letter from his doctor explaining the device's use. Fortunately, the rough treatment of the device caused it to keep recent images in its memory, instead of quickly overwriting them, so Dr. Mann has pictures of the men who assaulted him."

709 of 1,198 comments (clear)

  1. brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    but just doesn't understand why they won't leave him alone

  2. Stupid people fear what they don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Subject says it all

    1. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Subject says it all

      And as usual, what the subject says doesn't match the summary, which doesn't match the source material.

      He was briefly assaulted by one person while in a McDonald's. And by "assaulted" what I mean is that one guy tried to grab the glasses off his head, and when he realized they don't come off he quit trying, and took the time to listen to his explanation and read the paperwork. One of the other of the three tore up his doctor's note. Note this is not a permit, waiver, or exemption, it's just a note he uses to let people know it's a real device and not a prank.

      So here's my take on it from the point of view of the French assailant. Cranky store manager at the McPukes got offended by some uppity Tourist fuck who is in his eatery filming the other patrons. Which is not really legal under French law, and he knows that the cops aren't going to do anything if he breaks some fancy gadget some wannabe Paparazzi is using to do the filming. So the guy was pissed enough at some knuckle dragging North American to attempt to knock the glasses off his head, just like we see crotchety people knock cameras from the hands of film crews and photographers from time to time. When the uppity prick from another country tried to excuse himself with some completely unofficial paperwork he probably printed out at home, he got mad and tore the stuff up.

      I'm not justifying the guy's actions, don't take this the wrong way. I'm just saying that this was not some kind of targeted assault against technology or Mann which is what the slashdot submission is trying to make it out to be.
      And as a side note to Mann, if he reads this, take this as a bit of advice you didn't figure out after your little airport fiasco- It's not your country, you need to understand that you have to follow the cultural rules just as much, if not even more, than the codified laws. There are plenty of places that it would be a really bad idea to wear a device like this, and France is pretty high up on that list.

    2. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone fears what is different from themselves, or what they have accepted as a social norm. It's an evolutionary trait that allows humans to live and work in groups, and allows primitive tribes to keep sick individuals from infecting the rest of the tribe.

      Eventually most of us learn to ignore this trait as our higher thinking can do a better job of perceiving what is a threat and what is not. Apparently these individuals perceived this man's uniqueness as a threat on some level, so they attacked him. It doesn't excuse this behavior, but that's what happened.

      There was a very good episode of the TV show Head Games about this topic. They had some actors do things that go against our social norms, like refusing to stand in line. Those actors were nearly physically assaulted.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    3. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by invid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The most significant issues here are the implications of wearing a camera on your head and recording your life all the time. Here we have one problem in doing so, French McDonald's employees. Another problem is that Steve Mann probably wears his device in in the men's room and may incidentally record people doing things they might not want recorded. As such devices become less conspicuous we are going to get more incidents with wearable live cams, and we all will be recorded more often than we may wish.

      And why the heck is everyone talking about race? Race is completely off topic.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    4. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      No it just means bullies will always be bullies they don't need a reason

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    5. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's pretty clear from the article that his device does not permanently record anything, but simply has a ring buffer that stores the last short while for processing. The victim would not even have had images of his assailants if they had not broken his computer while assaulting him, freezing the ring buffer in place.

    6. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by PIBM · · Score: 2

      His device is not designed to record everything, only to process the vision, which is what his in part what his doctor letter was specifying I'd wager. From his blog, it only recorded the latest images because they weren't overwritten by the image processing since it was damaged by that "perpetrator number 1".

    7. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by invid · · Score: 1

      This particular device didn't record things permanently, but I'm sure there will be those that will, as well as those that will stream live feeds to the internet, post on Facebook and Twitter, etc.

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    8. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by invid · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you saw this guy in the men's room stall next to you, it wouldn't be immediately obvious that it wasn't recording anything permanent. (Not that I personally would mind, I'm not shy, but then again it might be cold and there might be shrinkage involved. You don't want shrinkage on the internet.)

      --
      The Moore-Murphy Law: The number of things that will go wrong will double every 2 years.
    9. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      This device doesn't. Its occurred to me many times that one of the features Google Glass will inevitably implement (by app if not by default) is some level of "real life dvr" where you keep a 5-30 minute buffer of video that you can rewind to review or store for later use at the flick of a button -- or subtle movement of the head.

      How many times have you had an argument over a bet or a promise that comes down to two divergent memories of the event -- prepare for a sea change.

    10. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pushing in front of a queue does indeed violate social norms, but it's not "being unique", it's being an asshole, and will be corrected by the other people present.

    11. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by imgumbydamnit · · Score: 2

      By your comment, I assume you did not dig deeper, so I will spoon-feed you. Steve Mann (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Mann) is a prominent researcher in augmented reality. He's been part-cyborg for over a decade. The current device is screwed into his skull. It does not record video, except when damaged. Oh, and he's Canadian, so rather than being an 'uppity prick' I bet he kept saying sorry.

      --
      To err is human. To arr is pirate.
    12. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I see no difference between what i see and what i can record. In the near future i WILL have an always on video recording device so that i can record and photograph at will. The world has forced this upon me by trying to dictate what i can and cannot record.

      --
      Good-bye
    13. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Everyone fears what is different from themselves

      Welcome to the world of overgeneralization based on the new standard of truth, wikipedia. Will Rogers would be so proud.

      I'm afraid of air? Air differs from me. I'm afraid of puppies? They differ from me.

      A more accurate statement would be a substantial portion of people are wary of significant novelty . But that wouldn't fit your pop-psychology agenda, would it?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    14. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Pushing in front of a queue does indeed violate social norms, but it's not "being unique", it's being an asshole

      Why is it "being an asshole" as you put it? It sounds perfectly reasonable to me. I'm not familiar with this "queue" technique you are talking about. My culture uses a different method. *devil's advocate*

      Waiting in line is entirely a custom created by our civilized society. Any parent of a preschooler will tell you that waiting in line has to be taught and doesn't come naturally. However, it is ingrained into our social norms at such an early age, that we refuse to accept anything else.

      Refusing to wait in line is only "being an asshole" because you were taught that way when you were very young. Perhaps the individuals in TFA were taught wearing fancy electronic eyewear was "being an asshole".

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    15. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      A more accurate statement would be a substantial portion of people are wary of significant novelty . But that wouldn't fit your pop-psychology agenda, would it?

      I think people fear those that reject their societal norms is a better way to phrase that. I also argue that this applies to everyone on some level.The only reason you haven't noticed it is because everyone around you conforms to your concept of normal. However, if someone started walking around a public place in the nude, you would call the cops. (That's not normal!)

      I propose that the individuals in this story emotionally responded to this man wearing his special glasses in the same way you and I might react to some streaker. However, they didn't call the cops. They didn't avoid eye contact, or stare at him, as I imagine most people do. They instead assaulted him (which is outside of our societal norms, hence this article.)

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    16. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Of course waiting in line is taught at a young age, and of course it is a custom present in most civilized societies that I'm aware of. In those societies, violating that does indeed make you an asshole. I'm having trouble understanding why you deny that acting against such rules of society is anything but being an asshole. The very definition of being an asshole is acting in a manner that the most people would find offensive, or most people would determine to be against established rules of society.

      Would you argue that someone who commits rape, or fleeces little old ladies out of their retirement through ponzi schemes, etc isn't being an asshole? These are admittedly extreme examples, and we have stronger words than "asshole" to describe people who commit such acts. Nonetheless, the person would still be (at minimum) an asshole.

      So once again, what is your point, aside from appearing to argue with yourself?

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    17. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      The very definition of being an asshole is acting in a manner that the most people would find offensive, or most people would determine to be against established rules of society.

      My point is, the men that assaulted Steve Mann feel he, according to your definition, is an asshole.

      Disclaimer: I personally have a different definition of asshole and do not think Steve Mann is one.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    18. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by Physix · · Score: 1

      ... it wouldn't be immediately obvious that it wasn't recording anything permanent...

      Based on the size of the device, it would be highly impractical to bother recording video or images as it does not have the memory capacity to make it worth while. Wireless transmitters are multiple square centimeters in size so this is not really a viable option either given current technology. Again it circles back to a fear from lack of understanding.

    19. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by geohump · · Score: 1

      > Everyone fears what is different from themselves,

      No, not everyone.
      As the prior commentor stated; Stupid people fear what they don't understand.
      Many of us have learned to look at the things we don't understand as an opportunity to learn something new.

      The policy of the French McDonalds is simply stupid beyond belief. There is no way that they can ever hope to prevent people from taking photos, videotaping or recording anything and everything that goes on in a public restaurant, especially a fast food restaurant like le McD's.

      The more important question is why are they trying to?

      My guess is that the restaurant is breaking some local Law and they don't any photographic proof of that act captured.

      Given the prevalence of cell phones today, even the idea of having such a policy is foolishness.

    20. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      In the UK we queue for everything automatically, (tho like sibling poster describes, it's probably drilled into us) EXCEPT when there's alcohol involved, then queuing goes out the window and it's everyone for themselves.

      That's a cultural thing right there,how is a foreigner supposed to know the queue-for-everything-but-beer rule? What if their culture has a queue-only-for-bagles rule?

      Now who's the asshole?

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    21. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's wired to a computer he keeps in his pants pocket (it's in his article: the I/O device didn't get damaged by the guy pulling on it, the CPU got damaged because the altercation caused him to pee himself and short it out).

      Given that there exist MicroSD cards the size of a fingernail that store 64 GB, I think it's reasonable to assume that he could have had plenty of memory capacity if he'd chosen to design it that way.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    22. Re:Stupid people fear what they don't understand by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I saw and unrelated thing recently about someone assaulted for photographing a scene in a public place. I've never understood why some people become violent about being recorded. Can someone explain what they are upset about?

  3. is it real by bs0d3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the story sounds possibly untrue and slanderous, and the only source that everyone is retweeting is the same one linked here, from a blog on blogspot that has only one post which was recently created.

    1. Re:is it real by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ye, sounds like a way to build some hype around the digital eye glass stuff.

      --
      ics
    2. Re:is it real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ye, sounds like a way to build some hype around the digital eye glass stuff.

      Bolting that thing to your head and getting beat up because of it? Yeah, that's something to get hyped about. What are you smoking?

    3. Re:is it real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      yes, this is probably fake, why didnt he went to the police and press charge? Why didnt he called the police and identified those persons? bullshit, this is

      From the article:

      I also contacted the Embassy, Consulate, Police, etc., without much luck.

      Him being a foreigner, I'm frankly not too surprised that the police were not helpful.

    4. Re:is it real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Can't believe some of the comments so far. This guy has been strapping computers to his body for 34 years, by his own count. He's been on slashdot many times in the past, and had run-ins with airport security a couple of times before:

      http://it.slashdot.org/story/02/03/14/2051228/airport-security-vs-cyborg-steve-mann
      http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/01/10/05/2237200/a-computer-display-in-ordinary-sunglasses
      http://linux.slashdot.org/story/00/08/08/1256229/more-on-the-linux-wrist-watch

      So it's very unlikely to be a fake. According to the article, he's contacted the police and Mcdonalds' with out any response. Based on his past experience with these types of situations, I think he knows exactly what he is doing in seeking some publicity.

    5. Re:is it real by chrismcb · · Score: 1, Informative

      Why didnt he called the police and identified those persons?

      He claims he did contact the police, and they were not helpful.

    6. Re:is it real by Frohboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Assuming the blog post was indeed written by the real Steve Mann, a guy who has been doing this wearable computing stuff for a while, I think we can trust that it's true. (And if he didn't write it, I would expect to hear something from him, saying that it's a fake.)

      It's also not his first altercation related to his wearable stuff. See, for example, this Slashdot story from 2002.

    7. Re:is it real by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well He's been doing this "digital eye glass stuff" for over 15 years now, and invented Wearable computing. you know those professors gotta get their faces in the news! Damn attention whores!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:is it real by marto · · Score: 1

      Didn't read TFA did you?

    9. Re:is it real by Minupla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just pointing out, what he in fact says is As McDonand's does not publish any direct contact email information,. The page you link to contains no email information. He also says I tried on many occasions to contact McDonald's but have not received any response and details attempting to call their US 800 line.

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    10. Re:is it real by Mithent · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Having just read several stories about how people were mugged in the UK and the police didn't care to investigate despite having leads in many cases, I can believe that.

    11. Re:is it real by Jesrad · · Score: 5, Informative

      McDonald's France is mostly a branding entity, and that the restaurants themselves are franchised. Most of the restaurants are small limited-liability, self-owned enterprises that lease out the brand, inner organization + recipes, and general appearance. They do have a deep, continued relationship with the brand itself, through the regular auditing, the training of employees and the management courses provided along with the branding. The branding entity does own some corporate restaurants, and apparently the Champs Elysées venue is among them, so this contact information may not be useless in this particular case.

      As a side-note, a simple web search turned out this french newspaper article about the director of this particular restaurant, Khader Aissani, who happens to look closely like the "perpetrator 1" identified in the original article's photos.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    12. Re:is it real by dave420 · · Score: 1

      What do the police in the UK have to do with the police in Paris? It's almost as if you're looking for a reason to be upset...

    13. Re:is it real by jeremyp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's this thing you can do where you print the content of your email on a piece of paper and put it inside a thing called an envelope. If you then write the address in the parent's link on the outside of the envelope and give it to your local postal company, for a small fee they will have it transported to the address you have written on the envelope.

      If this guy was serious, he'd have done that as well as writing the emails.

      I notice there's also a published telephone number. He could also have tried that, but he'd probably need good French to make that work.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    14. Re:is it real by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      Didn't try very hard, did he? There may not be an e-mail address there, but there's a phone number, in Paris, that he can call and speak to a human being who would be very interested to find out the details of the alleged assault, and would almost certainly give him an address where he can send the photos.

      Mais peut-etre qu'il ne parle pas le bon franÃais. ;-)

    15. Re:is it real by Jesrad · · Score: 5, Informative

      And based on my past experience, as a french citizen, of being assaulted and turning to the Police for help, I find his claims of getting no useful response completely realistic and plausible.

      However, once this incident becomes more widely known in french-language blogs and media, it'll quickly attract a lot of attention and will probably elicit an official (outraged) reaction of McDonald's France, and maybe cause a few interviews of politicians trying to look like they're concerned. That's how it works here.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    16. Re:is it real by Mithent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not directly, I just happened to have read that story earlier in the day (I'm British myself) and was reminded of it by this case where, apparently, the police also weren't very interested. I would like to think that the police in general, whether in Paris or London, would investigate this sort of thing when there's some evidence to go on, but clearly that doesn't necessarily happen - and so their supposed lack of response here doesn't seem as out-of-place as I'd like it to be, since there has been some discussion over whether the story sounded legitimate.

    17. Re:is it real by oobayly · · Score: 2

      I'm not convinced, Khader Aissani's ears appear to stick out a lot wider than those of "Perp 1". I can see more of Aissani's right ear when he's not looking directly at the camera than I can of "Perp 1" when he's looking directly at the camera.

    18. Re:is it real by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, if Gates or Linus were to write something like this, you would say that it was untrue and slanderous? Because Dr. Mann is well known in his field. This man did not attach a perm. eye piece to his head just to cause some nutjobs to attack him so that he could NICELY try to deal with this. And yes, I would say that he is dealing nicely with it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    19. Re:is it real by Pieroxy · · Score: 2

      And the fact that there is no record of the incident except his blog? Nothing in the local press, at least nothing not linking to his blog and citing said blog as the source of information?

    20. Re:is it real by Jesus_C_of_Nazareth · · Score: 2

      We have the same franchise model in much of Europe. Although generally consistent in any given area, some branches are pretty unfriendly places. There are two in my town, and I only ever use one of them. I stopped using the other one when they refused to allow me to use the toilet (it's kept locked) until I ordered food. I'm a well dressed, sober, I'm in my late 30s, and it was the afternoon. I asked for the manager, who didn't see a problem with their policy. By contrast, the other McDonalds just 5 minutes walk away has no such policy, and appear to be hiring personable and helpful staff/managers.

      --
      JC
    21. Re:is it real by Jesrad · · Score: 5, Informative

      And it's on: famous french blogger Maitre Eolas relayed the news much earlier this morning (does the guy even sleep ?), which then was picked up by L'Express (national newspaper) half an hour ago. It will be all over french social networks for the next couple days. Apparently the restaurant is not owned by McDonald's, it is a franchise owned by the limited-liability society Elyrest.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    22. Re:is it real by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Why didnt he called the police and identified those persons?

      He claims he did contact the police, and they were not helpful.

      Unless you speak fluent French then their police will not help you. This is the same for Spain too and probably many others, the trick is to talk to your consular representative and demand he deals with it on your behalf if you really need to report a crime for insurance purposes.

      At least if you visit us in the UK you can speak to the police in English.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    23. Re:is it real by ethanms · · Score: 1

      If he's got witnesses and better photos, I'd like to think McDonald's will want to settle this fast, particularly with the employee being involved.

      Looks (from the pics) like a couple of white collar euro thugs--I'm sure there's an American/Canadian equivalent, it just seems like the majority of aggressive adult "bullies" I see with stylish clothing, gelled hair and tans, also seem to have heavy european accents... which just goes to show you that at the end of the day you can be as intelligent or rich as you want, but when you're immersed in real life, it's the one with (or controlling) the most physical power who rules (or survives).

    24. Re:is it real by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      The solution in both cases seems that it would be 'carry a huge freakin' knife'. I would say gun, but this isn't the US.

      Bet the police would be interested when they had to clean someone up off the McDonald's floor.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    25. Re:is it real by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Having just read several stories about how people were mugged in the UK and the police didn't care to investigate despite having leads in many cases, I can believe that.

      Muggings happen all the time, the police have long since given up any shred of investigation since the punishment is almost non-existent providing no firearms are used or the victim does not need hospital treatment. The last time I as mugged I didn't even bother reporting it, who needs the hassle.

      If you want to make sure the police investigate you need to resist and get stabbed or something. If it is just a straight mugging with no violence (just the threat) then the punishment would be a fine or community order anyway even if they investigated:

      http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/sentencing_manual/handling/

      Both of these are joke punishments anyway and since we in the UK do not have a three strikes and your out law then dragging little yobs up in front of the courts or mugging is just a waste of police resources. If we wanted to change this we would need to build a shitload more prisons (and pay the resultant massive increase in taxes) since there are places like Salford (nr Manchester, where I used to live) where the entire populace would serve time before they were out of school.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    26. Re:is it real by Provocateur · · Score: 4, Funny

      But now, with this incident, he can really claim that he is on the bleeding edge of technology.

      What? Too soon?

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    27. Re:is it real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I completely agree with this assessment. I'm not French and I've never even been to France, but I saw 'Taken' starring Liam Neeson and the french police are total useless twats. You really have to take things into your own hands and kung-fu some bitches.

    28. Re:is it real by fibonacci8 · · Score: 2

      Claude Insensible!

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    29. Re:is it real by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      And based on my past experience, as a french citizen, of being assaulted and turning to the Police for help, I find his claims of getting no useful response completely realistic and plausible.

      However, once this incident becomes more widely known in french-language blogs and media, it'll quickly attract a lot of attention and will probably elicit an official (outraged) reaction of McDonald's France, and maybe cause a few interviews of politicians trying to look like they're concerned. That's how it works here.

      Actually, if he really wanted to do something about it he would find a French lawyer then let the guy pursue a no win - no fee civil case for damages against the business in question. Most of this can be done from Canada and will probably net him a few quid since because one of the morons was wearing a name badge and a uniform the business is probably liable for any damages caused.

        This has the added benefit that the owner of this business will immediately fire them to desperately try and distance himself from an act that he may well have actually been party to himself.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    30. Re:is it real by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      The site is not in English, so how could one be sure that someone on the other side would be speaking English? Please don't give an excuse that he could let his daughter talk because talking on the phone using someone else could deliver a different message.

    31. Re:is it real by Coeurderoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      For the local police it is a hassle and a insuficiently documented event, it would be the same in about any country.
      The only way to progress (unfortunatelly) is to contact a local lawyer, or the local Bar association http://www.avocatparis.org/
      And come back with the lawyer, explain that you want to sue for :
      - damage
      - discrimination (a latter to the HALDE) (the anti discrimination authority in France)
      - moral pain
      Seek cost of trial + damage + punitive damage, let's say (since it's not quite as expensive in France) 100 000 €
      And the answer will be quite different.

      And it has nothing to do with France as such but everything with the mindset an international Franchise breeds in the loosers who have to work for them.
      The "Garçons" in a local Brasserie might be haughty and unhelpful, they might speak no or little english, but they couldn't care less if you have a gizmo on your head or not, they are not afraid you will "copy" the "secrets" on the price list, or maybe focus on dirt and make a film "exposé" for the media.

      Moreover going to a mac donald in France is really not a very good idea, but the one on the champs élysé is one of the worst (he could also go to the one on "rue de flandre" chances are that the level of inteligence is similar, at least it had a similar reputation a couple of years back).

    32. Re:is it real by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      Muggings happen all the time, the police have long since given up any shred of investigation since the punishment is almost non-existent providing no firearms are used or the victim does not need hospital treatment. The last time I as mugged I didn't even bother reporting it, who needs the hassle.

      If you want to make sure the police investigate you need to resist and get stabbed or something. If it is just a straight mugging with no violence (just the threat) then the punishment would be a fine or community order anyway even if they investigated

      If there's no violence, how about walking away? And if there is, shoot the fucker. Self defense isn't a crime. If your government tells you that you can't defend yourself, get yourself a new government.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    33. Re:is it real by LordKronos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know, I hear this crap all the time. I spent a week in Paris and never met a single person who was anything less than polite. We even went to one small restaraunt where they didn't have any English menus, and the owner sat down at our table and went over the menu with us, translating about 30 different items into English the best he could. Time and again, we were helped by person after person who were nothing but polite. I suspect that if there is a problem, it is instigated by cocky foreigners who make no attempt to show respect and fit in. When I went, I don't speak french, but I learned 15-20 common words and phrases so that I could communicate basic needs with people who only speak french. It turned out that was almost entirely unnecessary, but I used them when I could anyway. I suspect it went a long way towards showing them some respect and that I wasn't just some cocky American there to be catered to while making jokes about the french.

    34. Re:is it real by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      Why would the Spanish police care how well you spoke French?

    35. Re:is it real by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      IIRC he's had them forcibly removed by security in the past.

    36. Re:is it real by indole · · Score: 1

      I also remember those airport security problems professor Mann had. I have to wonder whether he might be the sort of person that unintentionally escalates these situations. Or at least fails to effectively de-escalate them. Just a thought.

      Another possibility is the "McDonald's" employees were really law enforcement. Given the location and concerns about terrorism this situation may be much more similar to the TSA encounters Prof. Mann has already experienced.

      --
      (2,3-Benzopyrrole)
    37. Re:is it real by mlk · · Score: 1

      > shoot the fucker

      That would be out in the UK, but hitting the fucker is not, assuming that you are not dealing with a small kid.
      But the likelihood is the person doing the mugging is bigger than the person being mugged. So is your phone worth being beaten up or stabbed for?

      > If your government tells you that you can't defend yourself, get yourself a new government

      You can defend yourself, just not with a gun. I'm going to guess a response, so here we go:

      Given that only one party in the UK is pro liberal gun ownership (the Liberal Party [ http://www.liberal.org.uk/ ]) and they are tiny "get yourself a new government" is not going to happen. This is democracy, the majority don't want liberal gun ownership so we don't have it.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    38. Re:is it real by biodata · · Score: 1

      If they put their brand on it then they pay the price in lost brand value when their franchise employees behave like this. If it looks like a McDonalds, and sells McDonalds food then it is a McDonalds.

      --
      Korma: Good
    39. Re:is it real by N1AK · · Score: 1

      And if there is, shoot the fucker.

      I'm not sure if you're a troll or ignorant so I'll keep it brief. You carry a gun on the street in the UK and you will go to prison. You carry an offensive weapon and use it, even in self-defence and you will almost certainly go to prison for having it regardless.

    40. Re:is it real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's (obviously) highly variable. I went to France many years ago and had a very different experience. I spoke moderate amounts of French, more than enough to get by on a holiday, and used it consistently, but still got treated incredibly rudely from the start.

      One of the other people with me fell and broke his leg while we were there, and from the looks on the faces of some ticket-people when we had the temerity to ask if they had wheelchairs available to hire, you'd think I'd just explained in great detail a number of obscene things I wished to do to their loved ones.

      Never went back, I go to countries with friendlier people now.

    41. Re:is it real by hattig · · Score: 1

      A lot of those stories relate to the Metropolitan Police, who are pretty much one of the most useless and unfriendly policing organisations around. They certainly don't exist to help the public, and run away if things get too difficult, and god forbid that they actually need to do something that might involve thinking or minor effort. They need to be disbanded, and several professional police forces that are more localised to their area of London created to replace them.

    42. Re:is it real by punman · · Score: 1

      I am skeptical that physical assaults on anyone, including citizens of another country, are legal in France. Maybe they do things differently over there, I really don't know, but finding the proper authority shouldn't result in being ignored when reporting an assault. Maybe he just hasn't contacted the right people yet.

      I also understand it's probably a real pain in the ass to pursue this legally due to the short time one spends in a country on vacation, usually, so what might be more helpful is if someone could point the guy to the right person to talk to.

      It's probably a complete waste of time to talk to McDonald's, though.

    43. Re:is it real by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      When apocalypse comes, Mann will be there, taking pictures.

      (oh, I had him as a prof back in the nineties, he was always taking chances with the surrounding population)

    44. Re:is it real by countach74 · · Score: 1

      Right... which is why he included:

      If your government tells you that you can't defend yourself, get yourself a new government.

    45. Re:is it real by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      I like the American solution to this sort of thing. You shoot the bastards.

    46. Re:is it real by Talderas · · Score: 2

      We have them in America. They live on the shore of New Jersey. There is, sadly, a show about them.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    47. Re:is it real by metalgamer84 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Huh, remind me to never visit the UK. No wonder muggings happen so much there. Here in the US we carry handguns. If you mug somebody, you get shot in self defense.

    48. Re:is it real by Arthur+B. · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also based on my experience as a French citizen, I want to share that France is deeply culturally conservative. It is extremely frowned upon to deviate from the norm. To give you an idea, I once wore, for fun, a Fedora at my high-school in Paris. I had rocks thrown at me for that.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    49. Re:is it real by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      I also contacted the Embassy, Consulate, Police, etc., without much luck.

      Him being a foreigner, I'm frankly not too surprised that the police were not helpful.

      But it makes it sound like he contacted McDonald's first, and only when not getting anywhere, the embassy, consulate, police, etc. In fact, it sounds like he waited until he got home (Canada) before even trying anything.... and he doesn't want any monetary damage beyond repairing his glasses... and then ends with plea for McDonalds to aid vision research. I'm not feeling the sympathy well up within me. I understand people behave in a lot of ways I don't understand, but it makes even less sense to assault someone because of their glasses than it does because of their race.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    50. Re:is it real by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I would say gun, but this isn't the US.

      Not the reason I'd expect you to give, given your username.

    51. Re:is it real by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

      However, once this incident becomes more widely known in french-language blogs and media, it'll quickly attract a lot of attention and will probably elicit an official (outraged) reaction of McDonald's France, and maybe cause a few interviews of politicians trying to look like they're concerned. That's how it works here.

      Unfortunately, that is often how it works in the U.S. as well.

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    52. Re:is it real by gfxguy · · Score: 2

      Why does he even cover up the faces of the perpetrators at all? Especially if the "authorities" are refusing to help him? They won't win a lawsuit if what he claims is true.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    53. Re:is it real by mlk · · Score: 1

      Given that only one party in the UK is pro liberal gun ownership (the Liberal Party [ http://www.liberal.org.uk/ ]) and they are tiny "get yourself a new government" is not going to happen. This is democracy, the majority don't want liberal gun ownership so we don't have it.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    54. Re:is it real by Apuleius · · Score: 1

      "Oddly, we also have far less shooting massacres than you bloody Septics. Funny how those seem to be related, isn't it?"

      Not that the parent comment isn't daft, it is, but you should know that us Septics enjoy a far gentler street culture, and encounter casual violence far less than you Limeys, precisely because our criminals keep killing each other.

    55. Re:is it real by Apuleius · · Score: 2

      "Actually, if he really wanted to do something about it he would find a French lawyer then let the guy pursue a no win - no fee civil case for damages against the business in question. "

      No-win-no-fee is illegal just about everywhere outside the English speaking world.

    56. Re:is it real by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Huh, remind me to never visit the UK. No wonder muggings happen so much there. Here in the US we carry handguns. If you mug somebody, you get shot in self defense.

      Yeah, that must be why the crime rate here in the US is so low.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    57. Re:is it real by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Why would there (necessarily) be something in the press? This is news for geeks, but editors have to make a judgement call everyday as to whether a particular story will be of interest to readers. The newspaper doesn't print everything that happened yesterday, not even every assault (for a city as big as Paris), only the stuff that they guessed readers might be interested in.

      In this case, they called no.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    58. Re:is it real by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Fun in France - total prick of a waiter says "I don't speak English" in perfect unaccented English in response to my USAian-accented French when ordering. So *after* we get our food, I smile at him and tell him his mother sucks donkey balls.

    59. Re:is it real by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      Haha I'm not sure if you're trolling, but have you looked up relative crime rates between UK and US cities? Carrying guns does not reduce crime.

    60. Re:is it real by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Calling McDonalds will just get you some sort of platitude like "Free LeBigMacs for Life!".

      No way. Hold out for the Royale With Cheese.

    61. Re:is it real by JohnnyLocust · · Score: 1

      Ye, sounds like a way to build some hype around the digital eye glass stuff.

      Bolting that thing to your head and getting beat up because of it? Yeah, that's something to get hyped about. What are you smoking?

      Looks like he's smoking deductive reasoning. Care for a hit?

    62. Re:is it real by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      Police the world over have several agendas that may not be entirely in accord with their purpose. I'm not talking corruption necessarily. In some cases, they want victims of petty crimes to just go away and stop bothering them. A petty crime means tearing themselves away from their coffee and donuts to do a lot of work for nothing as they know too well the courts will let the criminals go with a wrist slap, even in cases where the courts actually would not let the perps off so lightly. They have their prejudices too, and will be less willing to help foreigners, blacks, Muslims, Jews, you name it. Often they're hunting for revenue in the form of fines. Ticket quotas are illegal, but there are other ways to pressure the police into acting as surrogate tax men. Sometimes, they're looking to boost their crime fighting statistics, and they will try to read much bigger crimes into a situation. An example is an account I read of an insane woman who would turn mean and dangerous when off her meds, and do crazy things like set her own house on fire, and cut and beat herself and her children for no reason. Several times, the family called on police to restrain her. Big mistake. They booked her for arson, assault and battery, and so on, and imprisoned her when they should have packed her off to a mental institution.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    63. Re:is it real by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Is this an offshoot of the Liberal Democrats, or is it "the original Liberal party"?

      Are they basically like the Libertarians of the US?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    64. Re:is it real by Blue+Stone · · Score: 2

      >As a side-note, a simple web search turned out this french newspaper article [20minutes.fr] about the director of this particular restaurant, Khader Aissani, who happens to look closely like the "perpetrator 1" identified in the original article's photos.

      Nah - the dude has sticky-out ears. The perpetrator 1 guy doesn't.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    65. Re:is it real by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      There is are the actual pictures taken with the eye glasses, does that count as a "record"?

    66. Re:is it real by Picass0 · · Score: 1

      The author would be risking his reputation (he's a PhD) and a potential lawsuit from McDonald's if this is false.

    67. Re:is it real by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      The pictures hardly show anything of value except the overlay that state "perp 1" and "perp 2". I think it was postprocessed.

      I can too take pictures of random strangers in a McDonald and do that.

    68. Re:is it real by Vlaix · · Score: 1

      As another French citizen, I find this to be off the target. Our country might be, to my own desperation, the most permissive around the block. Your misadventure is probably due to the fact that Parisian high-schools are virtually zones of civil war, except for some high-end ones (Henri IV, Louis le Grand...).

    69. Re:is it real by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      He could have actually, you know, tried the number and found out that way that yes, they do speak English at the McDo head office in Paris. The language of business is French, but the languages of service include English.

    70. Re:is it real by Tenek · · Score: 1

      That's why when I mug somebody in the US, I make sure to shoot them first.

    71. Re:is it real by GodInHell · · Score: 2

      Well, last time someone tore up his computer and glasses it got covered. Mann has these issues from time to time, its part of the risk he runs for being an early adopter in integrating technology directly into his body.

    72. Re:is it real by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      It shows them tearing up the papers.

    73. Re:is it real by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      To reiterate a famous quote:

      " An armed society is a polite society. "

      What happened to this guy - in front of his family, no less! - is absolutely inexcusable. Someone needs to get ahold of the top people that represent Mcdonald's in France and START some shit rolling downhill! All 3 people deserve to lose their jobs, #1 - (if not the whole franchise location getting shutdown due to the bad publicity) and for destroying his documents and physically assaulting the guy, 30 days in jail *minimum.*

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    74. Re:is it real by berashith · · Score: 1

      I was once in a fight with an ENTIRE McDonalds night staff. They really tried to charge out the door and fight me and my friends. It was pretty funny as no one got hurt, but the attempt to contact McDonalds to complain became impossible. The phone line for complaints ended up with me contacting the manager who happened to be on duty that night. Other managers that worked there also protected their friends when we tried to go in during the day. There was going to be no way to get the attention of upper management unless I had gone through the police to file charges and presented those through legal procedures. We had spoken with the cops that night, and because one of my friends had stolen a pager during the fight ( this was a long time ago ), we basically declined pressing the issue that night to avoid him having charges pressed for taking ,and me for the fact that the pager was hidden in my car.

      The phone number doesnt get you far, as this is a company that is interested in selling 1$ sandwiches, and doesnt really need to protect its reputation.

    75. Re:is it real by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      He should have told them they were adding anti-freeze to the wine.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    76. Re:is it real by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      By de-descalate you mean 'do what ever the agitated person wants'?

      --
      Good-bye
    77. Re:is it real by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... got caught up in some kafkaesque three-day struggle that mostly seemed to involve going to different places to wait for hours to get some stamp on a piece of paper just so I could go back to the place I was before that to get another stamp so I could go somewhere else to wait for several hours for another stamp...

      That's also the norm pretty much everywhere. One of my favorite stories from when I moved here (Massachusetts) was while getting a local driver's license. I went to the DMV (Dept of Motor Vehicles), filled out the form, and the person I handed it to told me they couldn't approve it until I had proof of (auto) insurance. So I went to a local insurance dealer - who told me that they couldn't insure me because I didn't have a state driver's license yet. I went back to the DMV, and when I got the same rejection, told the person that I'd just come from an auto-isurance company, where I was told that I had to get a driver's license first. The person behind the counter grinned, and accepted by application.

      She knew exactly what the game was. When I mentioned this to a few other people that I was working with, most of them said that the same runaround had happened to them.

      I wonder if there's any place in the world where you can't find similar stories.

      (And to forestall the usual comments about the evils of government bureaucracies, note that one of the two parties to this runaround was a retail outlet of a private corporation. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    78. Re:is it real by jabelli · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in the UK, the "huge freakin' knife" is just as illegal as the gun.

    79. Re:is it real by metalgamer84 · · Score: 1

      Nope, Minnesota. We have whats Concealed Carry permits. It allows us to carry handguns concealed or visible legally. My wife and I both carry. I'm sorry you live in fear, we don't.

    80. Re:is it real by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      After 34 years, you'd think he would have figured out a way to make the thing a bit more inconspicuous

    81. Re:is it real by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If I was the operator on the US 800 line, I would at least have given him the number for the FR 800 line. I certainly understand that the US branch of a multinational corporation may not be able to do anything about an incident that occurred in a French store.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    82. Re:is it real by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      And here's an earlier comment with some of that press you were looking for:

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2983577&cid=40671869

    83. Re:is it real by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 1

      But there are pics! Ergo, it must have happened.

    84. Re:is it real by lecoupdejarnac · · Score: 1

      It's funny you should say that. Last time I was in France I wore a Fedora (ok, actually it was a Panama-hat) to a night club, and 5 separate individuals approached me throughout the night and asked me if I was selling drugs. They also pulled me out of line at the airport to search my bags before boarding the plane, and I think it was the hat that led them to select me. If you want to look like a drug dealer in France... be a young adult in a Fedora or Panama hat.

    85. Re:is it real by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      yes, this is probably fake, why didnt he went to the police and press charge? Why didnt he called the police and identified those persons? bullshit, this is

      Did you even take a look at the pictures he took!!
      http://eyetap.blogspot.ca/2012/07/physical-assault-by-mcdonalds-for.html

      And yes, he did contact the police, but to no avail.

    86. Re:is it real by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Really ?

      So you'd claim it's self-defence ?

      Let's look at this rationally:

      So the problem above was:

      you need to prove you were assulted/mogged/whatever to the police so'll they actually start an invenstigation, so these people can get fined or maybe even go to jail. If you don't give them some evidence to go on the police won't investigate it.

      instead you would:

      You'd shoot first and ask questions later, so the police will take you away and again you will have to prove something.

      But this time, you'll have to prove it was self-defence and if you can't prove it, you will be the one that goes to jail.

      Yeah, great solution that is...

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    87. Re:is it real by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      In the UK, you get stabbed. Or shot... because the criminals had guns, anyway.

    88. Re:is it real by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      Actually, only about 45% of Americans own a gun -- but we also have 668 times the number of people killed by firearms that the UK does, and the chances of survival decrease if a burglary/mugging victim brandishes a gun.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    89. Re:is it real by countach74 · · Score: 1

      Get yourself a new government can also mean move somewhere less restrictive.

    90. Re:is it real by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      That would be out in the UK, but hitting the fucker is not, assuming that you are not dealing with a small kid.
      But the likelihood is the person doing the mugging is bigger than the person being mugged. So is your phone worth being beaten up or stabbed for?

      No, but either of those things may happen either way. Hence why you shoot them. If someone simply demands your wallet, you chuckle and continue walking. If they threaten you with bodily harm, respond appropriately and with deadly force if necessary. This is the right of every human being regardless of where they live.

      You can defend yourself, just not with a gun.

      So "you can do x, you simply can't have any of the tools necessary to do x"? That makes no sense. It's like saying "you can change out a flat on the highway, just not with a tire that's inflated." It's a Non Sequitur. If you have the right to defend yourself (and you do, all human beings do), then you have the right to use the tools necessary to do so. How does an 80 year old 90lb woman keep from getting mugged/robbed/beaten/raped/murdered by a 6'3" 250lb criminal? She pulls out a 9mm, aims, and fires. A gun is a tool that equalizes any confrontation. The worst the other guy can have is a gun. The most you can have is a gun. Ergo, if you have a gun, your worst-case scenario is that you're now on equal footing with your assailant. This is an incredible tool.

      This is democracy, the majority don't want liberal gun ownership so we don't have it.

      It's two wolves and a hen voting on what's for dinner; that's what it is. You can't take away someone's intrinsic rights by voting. The majority can't vote all women into slavery and have it be right. The majority can't vote all blacks into slavery and have it be right. The majority can't vote that we kill all people over age 65 and have it be right. The majority can't vote that homosexuals will all be rounded up and chemically castrated and have it be right. The majority can't vote that blacks and whites must use separate bathrooms and have it be right. And the majority can't vote that human beings may have no legal access to the tools necessary to defend themselves from violent criminals and have it be right.

      All people have the right to self-defense.
      Therefore, all people have the right to keep and use the tools necessary for that right to have any appreciable meaning.
      As such, no vote by any majority can rightfully take those tools away.

      If your government allows human rights to be stripped by majority vote, your government is broken. Get yourself a new government.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    91. Re:is it real by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      With what gun, you idiot bloody Yank?

      Handguns are banned outright in my country, including (almost the entirety of) the police, and most people, including said police (who ARE regularly ballotted), WANT it that way.

      If most people WANT to enslave black people, does that make it right? Both you and we did that for a long time. The majority (who were regularly ballotted), WANTED it that way. If most people WANT to take away women's voting rights, does that make it right? Both you and we did that for a long time. The majority (who were regularly ballotted), WANTED it that way.

      Stripping people of their basic human rights cannot be rightfully done by majority vote. Sure it can be done through threat of force and violence (such as armed police/paramilitary troops raiding your home and hauling you off to prison at gunpoint), but no amount of force can make it right. It doesn't matter how many people vote or how many people are arrested; basic human rights still exist. Among those is the right to self defense and the tools necessary to make that right have actual meaning.

      Oddly, we also have far less shooting massacres than you bloody Septics. Funny how those seem to be related, isn't it?

      Less shootings? Absolutely. Less violent crime? Not by a long shot.

      UK: 2,000 violent crimes per 100,000 people (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/5712573/UK-is-violent-crime-capital-of-Europe.html)
      US: 404 violent crimes per 100,000 people (http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/violent-crime/violent-crime)

      Worst city in the US: Memphis with 1,007 violent crimes per 100,000 people (http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/table-6)

      Wake me up when your gun/self-defense free country stops being the violence capital of the western world.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    92. Re:is it real by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      UK: 2,000 violent crimes per 100,000 people (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/5712573/UK-is-violent-crime-capital-of-Europe.html)
      US: 404 violent crimes per 100,000 people (http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/violent-crime/violent-crime)

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    93. Re:is it real by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      http://www.usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_reciprocity_maps.html

      In the vast majority of the United States, it is legal to own and carry firearms.

      In Kennesaw, GA, it's required (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennesaw,_Georgia#Gun_law) and they have one of the lowest violent crime rates in the country (http://www.cityrating.com/crime-statistics/georgia/kennesaw.html).

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    94. Re:is it real by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      The chances of being burglarized or mugged in the first place decrease significantly if the intended "victim" is believed to be armed.

      You see a lot of rapes, muggings, or murders at police stations and gun shows?

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    95. Re:is it real by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      Our property crime rates roughly equal UK violent crime rates. Our violent crime rate is about 1/5 of their's.

      So yes, the guns may not be keeping my TV from getting stolen while I'm on vacation, but they keep me from getting stabbed over my wallet and cell phone.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    96. Re:is it real by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      In the UAE, there are no muggings or guns. I haven't even seen a police officer with a gun. Or any violent crime.

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    97. Re:is it real by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Whatever you and he are smoking, it's interfering badly with your ability to identify intellectual recreational pharmaceuticals.

      That's not deductive reasoning, that's wild-assed speculation cut with conspiracy theory. Looks like your dealer sold you a dime bag of logical ditchweed.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    98. Re:is it real by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I also remember those airport security problems professor Mann had. I have to wonder whether he might be the sort of person that unintentionally escalates these situations. Or at least fails to effectively de-escalate them.

      Would it similarly be "escalation" for a paraplegic to refuse to remove his prosthetic leg for airport security? The policy says they shouldn't have to, after all. (Admittedly, a policy which is apparently not followed.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    99. Re:is it real by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience pseudo backpacking it there back in 2001- everyone was fairly decent, even had a few bakers laugh at my crappy french and tell me that English was fine.. The rudest people I ran into were a group of University of California, Berkeley students sitting in our hostel loudly complaining about how loud and rude the french were.

    100. Re:is it real by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Citation please, other than "In the Bay Area, that's how it is".

    101. Re:is it real by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Nah, that only works when the mugger is unarmed. When the mugger is armed, you end up dead. Thankfully, a robber with a gun sees the gun as easy cash (sold on the street), and not as a tool of the trade.

    102. Re:is it real by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I met a bunch of assholes in France. I took the train to Versailles. On the return trip, I went to buy the ticket back. I don't remember the exact price, but it was something like 14.50. Having what I had on me, I wanted to get rid of 4.50 in coin, so I put 24.50 down on the counter and asked for one ticket back. She looked at me like I was insane, pulled the twenty franc note out from under the coins, gave me 5.50 in coins back, and my ticket. So I walked away with crap service and two kilos more in my pocket than I needed.

      I didn't want to be treated like a king. I just wanted to be treated like a person.

  4. Just to clarify by isorox · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's important to clarify (as I had to RTFA to realise this), that he claims he was assaulted by 3 employees of McDonalds

    This wasn't a random assault by other customers at some shady McDonalds at 3AM, nor was it an assault by a typical skinhead -- from the photos the alleged perpetrators were McDonalds Management.

    He's not the first person to claim McDonalds staff in France assault their customers.

    1. Re:Just to clarify by ratbag · · Score: 2

      If this kind of comment from an AC is going to get moderated "Interesting" I think the writer really should provide some citations so we can determine whether there's an axe being ground.

      For a start, please quantify your "staff ... mostly uneducated..." and "whenever you read..." and "most violence..." comments.

      Also "natives" - seriously?

    2. Re:Just to clarify by chebucto · · Score: 2

      Most violence nowadays are from immigrants and directed towards the natives.

      Care to back this up?

      Or is it what it so clearly looks like - zenophobic, alarmist, and race-baiting?

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    3. Re:Just to clarify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, seriously. Do you have a problem with acknowledging that there is such a thing as native Europeans? The left has no problems in acknowledging the existence of Native Americans. The same concept works for Europeans. Europeans are native to somewhere and that just happens to be Europe.

      I know, it's a hard concept to grasp.

    4. Re:Just to clarify by ratbag · · Score: 1

      As a European (from the UK), who regularly travels on business and pleasure to France, Germany and Switzerland, I don't have enough data to make any statements such as you make in your original comment. Hence the request for citations. I can't speak for "people like me", just me, but I can say that what I "won't understand" is rampant generalisation, backed up only by anecdote, but stated as fact.

      So, help me out, show me the data that describes your reality and we can avoid the silly name calling.

    5. Re:Just to clarify by chebucto · · Score: 1

      zenophobic

      Affraid of Zeus??

      You mean "xenophobic".

      I'll claim typo on that one

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    6. Re:Just to clarify by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Odd... I have never been assaulted or otherwise bothered in a McD, ever. Then again, this ain't France and we tend to treat our foreigners like people instead of dirt.

      Hint: It MIGHT make people less likely to hate you if you treat them like people.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Just to clarify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's only inaccurate if it's not true. You're jumping to conclusions just as much as the guy you're criticizing. Do you know for certain that it isn't true?

      For rhetorical purposes: what if it were true (based on published statistics that I'm sure is out there if one had the time to research) that immigrants commit more crimes per capita than non-immigrants; then what? Would you see it as being justified to have this conversation, or would you come up with a different reason to paint this topic as being morally reprehensible?

    8. Re:Just to clarify by radio4fan · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that McDonald's staff in Europe is mostly uneducated non-European immigrants from the Middle East or North Africa (MENA)

      It appears to me from the photos that at least two out the three assailants are white, as are the three people you can see working behind the counter.

      But don't let the facts stand in the way of your bigotry!

    9. Re:Just to clarify by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      I'd actually *expect* immigrants to have a higher rate of crime than the population in general. After all, you usually don't immigrate to a country if you were well off back home. Often you have just enough to get out and escape your circumstances and you're coming from what *I* would call a shit hole. But I'm a privileged 1st-world middle class white boy.

      So, there you are in a new country with a different culture and likely less education. You tend to get a bottom-end job (jobs the natives don't want, which is why they tolerate immigration in the first place). If you're first-generation, you sound funny and the natives treat you like a second-class citizen. If you're the child of immigrants, you may still sound funny and you're still culturally odd.

      Don't fit in, have trouble with the language, can't get a good job, possibly less educated, possibly from a culture that doesn't have the same standards for personal interactions. Probably some racism directed your way. Yeah, I can't see how that could translate to a higher crime rate!

    10. Re:Just to clarify by Captain.Abrecan · · Score: 1

      Except that Caucasian people come from the Caucacus Mountains in Iran (unlike Anglo, who are Scandinavian). Most moors look very white without a tan. You see this a lot in Polish, Italians, Armenians and the French who are very dark 'white' folk. You can't tell race by skin color anymore, and *you* are the one who is bigoted about the issue (because your state of mind of is devoted to your own opinions and prejudices).

    11. Re:Just to clarify by Johann+Lau · · Score: 2

      Considering the nutritional value, that's like adding injury to injury :/

    12. Re:Just to clarify by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, seriously. Do you have a problem with acknowledging that there is such a thing as native Europeans? The left has no problems in acknowledging the existence of Native Americans. The same concept works for Europeans. Europeans are native to somewhere and that just happens to be Europe.

      I know, it's a hard concept to grasp.

      Europe has indigenous peoples just like the Americas do. Being in part an indigenous European, I'd take offence at your blathering if it weren't so obviously the result of a deluded mind. I just feel sorry for you.

    13. Re:Just to clarify by Johann+Lau · · Score: 2

      Not that I really wanna dignify you with a response, but: while Berlin certainly does have violence coming from groups of your favourite scapegoats, the skinheads sure as fuck aren't happy fun time. Also, most violence in ghettos is against people in ghettos. Not saying that's better.

      Though people like you actually make me wish it was as true as you claim it is, then we could just feed you fuckers to those "lions" to free up some resources and time to figure out how to tackle it. There are problems with "separate societies" - they're nowhere near as huge as you make it out to be, but I wouldn't shrug it off, either - and one thing is sure, assholes like you are contributing to it. If I came to a country where people look down on me, and treat me like second class, I'd stick to people who speak my language, too. And if I had only primitive education or shitty role models, I might be a thug. So? You're the one in the armchair, you're the one with idle time, you're the literate one, you be the one who figures it out.

      It's hard to be separate and distrusting of people who love you for decades. I'd even say it can't be done. But it's very easy to do when you aren't loved but exploited, or at least just ignored and left to your own devices. (I know this is just some bleeding heart liberal BS to you anyway, so why not really explore the space n stuff) Yeah, verily: look at the confused, alienated, selfish, trinket-addicted societies immigrants come to, and then look me in the eye, and moan how it's "their fault" that they don't show traits not even we have. Fuck that. First things first.

    14. Re:Just to clarify by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What do you expect if you create ghettos and stuff them with people without a perspective?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Just to clarify by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It is not as if the ghettos are artifically created. They sort of grow. Immigrants tend to move to districts where the cost of living is lower. The higher amount of immigrants estranges the locals who move away from those districts. This creates a positive feedback loop and voila, you've got a ghetto.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    16. Re:Just to clarify by Guignol · · Score: 1

      No zenophobic from Zenon's paradox.
      Your parent is clearly uncontrollably afraid of logical fallacies, or maybe of infinity, or maybe of tortoises

    17. Re:Just to clarify by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That immigrants commit disproportionally many crimes in most Western countries is a well-established fact - a simple google search for "france crime immigrant" and so on for other countries will net you plenty of data. Furthermore, if you look at the data, it specifically pertains to immigrants from poorer countries - which, of course, tend to be Asian and African ones rather than other Europeans.

      The reasons for that are also well-known: poverty breeds crime, and those immigrants are on average poorer than natives or immigrants from more well-off countries.

    18. Re:Just to clarify by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      After all, you usually don't immigrate to a country if you were well off back home. Often you have just enough to get out and escape your circumstances and you're coming from what *I* would call a shit hole.

      I was in the top 10% of wage earners in the USA when I moved out to go to someplace better. If that makes the USA a shithole, and top 10% wage earner is not well off, then so be it. The people that immigrate are those that are in the top parts of back home, or they wouldn't have the resources to move. You may be confusing "refugees" and immigrants. Refugees are a tiny subset of immigrants, and generally are from the lower status back home, unless they are targeted because they are *not* from the lower status (a number of businessmen get targeted by gangs for their money, earning them "refugee" status, if they wish to pursue it.

      Ignorant xenophobes like you are a good reason why anyone "well off" should get out of the US, while they are still well off.

  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. I do not condone violence nor stealing... by LLKrisJ · · Score: 1

    ... and kudos for this guy trying to push technology (use) forward.

    But bolting the thing to your head?? Seriously?? WTF?

    1. Re:I do not condone violence nor stealing... by will_die · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is for those that want the extra special TSA experience.

    2. Re:I do not condone violence nor stealing... by bs0d3 · · Score: 1

      thought I read he was from Ontario at some point

    3. Re:I do not condone violence nor stealing... by LLKrisJ · · Score: 1

      Ah :) only MIT stuck with me :) But still so, in this day and age...

    4. Re:I do not condone violence nor stealing... by LourensV · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, he's doing research on becoming a cyborg. The Borg didn't take off their gear before going to bed, and I can see how it just wouldn't be realistic if you could take your augmentations off whenever you wanted. And after all, glasses with built-in screens have been available for years now, so he would be rather behind the curve if he was simply wearing them occasionally.

      I seem to recall a story about Steve Mann from many years ago (but can't find it any more), where he similarly bumped into society's expectations of what a human is supposed to be. He was refused entry to an airplane unless he turned off his wearable computer. He at least initially refused, arguing that since there was a heart monitor connected to it, turning it off could result in him having an undetected heart issue, so that turning it off meant risking his life.

      It's not quite the same as here, as there were probably very valid safety grounds in that case, but it does show that the idea that a computer can be part of a person is still alien to us. At the same time, we are moving closer all the time to that scene in Accelerando where Manfred Macx is robbed of his computer and barely knows who he is anymore. Interesting times, and as you said, kudos to dr. Mann for pushing the envelope.

    5. Re:I do not condone violence nor stealing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Takes one to know one.

      Hes Canadian. Almost 1/4 of Canadas population considers french to be their first language and its 1 of 2 official languages in Canada.

      Maybe US has gotten alot worse since i was there last time but compared to then i have seen alot worse. And as a rule of thumb security is generally not that hard to work with when you have correct paperwork.

      So in summary learn2read.

    6. Re:I do not condone violence nor stealing... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are quite a few people walking this earth with built in computers. Modern pacemakers are nothing short of a computer system that not only "dumbly" shoots electricity into your heart but they monitor it, gauge its function and then react to it, a task that is very hard to do without a system to process information. They can't take it off without some rather invasive surgery and I wouldn't recommend turning it off either.

      Then what about people with built in hearing aids? These little thingamajigs are crammed right into their hearing apparatus and do their work there, also impossible to remove without cutting their skull open.

      What these two systems have in common, and what sets them apart from the one in question, is just that you don't see them obviously. Ok, the latter has an outside part, usually, but that looks just like some ordinary hearing aid device, something we got used to by now. We're also used to glasses, which are visible but not very "high tech". Nobody tried to deliberately knock off my glasses lately, though, actually, not since high school.

      So what's the difference? The difference is just that people look "odd" with those things attached, and that we see them. So as long as we don't see how people are being technically altered it's fine? Great, so I'll just get the shotgun attached into my arm instead of onto it and you should be ok with it, I guess.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:I do not condone violence nor stealing... by Apuleius · · Score: 1

      "In any case, this guys seems a bit disconnected from reality:"

      What do you expect?

      It takes people who are just that little bit cuckoo to do the pioneering work in fields like augmented eyesight.

      Think of it this way: the first man to drink cow's milk was completely bonkers.

    8. Re:I do not condone violence nor stealing... by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      Cough you ain't kidding.

    9. Re:I do not condone violence nor stealing... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Except this was not a medical device like a pacemaker, it was basically a camera electively attached to his head. It's no different from a cosmetic piercing or tattoo, really. I don't see why "I had this recording device surgically attached to my skull for entertainment/research/insanity" is a good reason to break their "no cameras or recording devices in the store" policy.

      But anyway, no store policy gives them a right to assault him, all they can do it ask him to leave. What I don't understand is why he didn't just call the police immediately...

  7. bs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That "recent images" in its memory explanation is bullshit. Just think about the logic in it. If it was built to record, why would it have storage for a few seconds but nothing longer? And why would it have code added to sense that it is broken and stop recording? Most likely the device stored everything just like a video camera. The men were bothered because they rightly thought that he was recording the place. Not that that is reason for anyone to get assaulted though.

    1. Re:bs... by chrismcb · · Score: 2

      The claim is it isn't built to record. But it does have a short buffer. Since it stopped recording, the buffer was not overwritten.

    2. Re:bs... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      If it was built to record, why would it have storage for a few seconds but nothing longer?

      That's called a buffer.

      And why would it have code added to sense that it is broken and stop recording?

      Why would it keep recording if the camera is broken, what would the point be in that?

    3. Re:bs... by Dynamoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dashboard cameras in cars do the same thing - if there's an impact then they save the current video clip and do not overwrite it. Not so difficult to do.

      --
      Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
  8. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man travels to France. Chooses to eat at McDonald's. Seriously. Then COMPLAINS he gets beaten up!

    1. Re:What? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      It happens. I was in a huge food court in Kuala Lumpur where the goodness only starts with the Malaysian food, The place was seriously crowded and I noticed a young English couple (they looked that way, I could tell) perched on a little ledge meakly eating subway sandwiches.

    2. Re:What? by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      I went to Spain with a few friends from all over, one from France. There was some good food (it's where the idea of tapas originated), but soon the French guy told us he really wanted to try a specific type of food. I figured clearly he would have discriminating taste, wanted to know what his preference was.

      Burger King. Apparently the guy was dying the whole time to try Burger King. I shook my head in sadness at the loss of stereotypes. Another thing he got really mad at me for giving money to a street performer. He said they were annoying and didn't deserve it. Wow.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:What? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      You've clearly never traveled with my wife. It's an object lesson in how parents can unwittingly twist a child's development to result in an amazingly limited palate. We usually stop at a fast food restaurant before attending any "nice" meal occasion (say, a wedding or rehearsal dinner, or charity banquet) so that she has something to eat. SMH

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:What? by digitig · · Score: 2

      In Beijing, Subway was the only place I could find vegetarian food (and I had a native Chinese speaker with me, so it wasn't just translation problems).

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    5. Re:What? by BadgerRush · · Score: 2

      [...] in Kuala Lumpur [...] I noticed a young English couple [...] eating subway sandwiches.

      Maybe they were not tourists but permanent residents. As someone who lived abroad for three years I have to say, eating your home-food once in a while is very good to combat homesickness.

    6. Re:What? by firewrought · · Score: 1

      Man travels to France. Chooses to eat at McDonald's. Seriously. Then COMPLAINS he gets beaten up!

      Heh... I remember taking several trips to the McD's on Champs Elysées because it was the cheapest place to get a large cold Coke. Good for my travel cred? No, but soft drinks are sort of my touchpoint with home while abroad, and they reduced the nervousness and insecurity of traveling alone in foreign lands. (And you gotta hand it to Coca-Cola... you can get their product anywhere.)

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    7. Re:What? by The+Mister+Purple · · Score: 1

      There are places in China that feature vegetarian cuisine, but for some funny reason, the capitol of the country is dominated by meat-eaters. It's almost like they're higher up the food chain or something...

      --
      "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Feynman
    8. Re:What? by Media_Scumbag · · Score: 1

      I thought that too, but then I noticed that he had brought his kids.
      Say what you will, but "the Force is strong with this one;" just try and wrench a kid's attention from McDonald's once the subject has come up.
      I dare ya.
      To them, fries are foie gras.

    9. Re:What? by redrew89 · · Score: 1

      You fail to see the point. He was assaulted on the sole grounds that he was wearing an eye-mounted computing device, and the representatives of the store in question didn't like it. Their behaviour is reprehensible, and betrays a significant level of ignorance. Je ne suis pas français, mais j'ai beaucoup de respect pour la société française. Incedents comme celui-ci de réduire cet égard.

    10. Re:What? by redrew89 · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait, you were trying to be funny. Somehow, I missed the joke.

    11. Re:What? by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      And the plastic gloves they make employees wear are a good way to combat diarrhea

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    12. Re:What? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I recommend to all Americans traveling abroad that they try going to McDonald's in whatever country they happen to be traveling to. It's a very different experience - almost always a positive one, but I have heard a couple of horror stories.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    13. Re:What? by digitig · · Score: 1

      The native speaker was also fluent in English, having lived and worked in England for over 25 years, and understands my dietary wishes pretty well having been married to me for over 20 of those years. Yes, there were non-meat dishes on the menus, but they were cooked in the same broth as the meat and fish or the same wok, and usually had bits of meat in them anyway, so stuff that I was assured was meat-free was no such thing. See this article, for example, about the problems of trying to get vegetarian food in Beijing. Hong Kong is well served for Buddhist vegetarian restaurants, and I use them extensively, but it seems that (as a result of decades of religious suppression?) Beijing is nowhere near so well served.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    14. Re:What? by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      I concurr. My wife was the same way - while here in Dubai, she loved to eat KFC, Subway and Pizza Hut simply because it was something she recognized and it made her happy despite eating what is crap food to be avoided back home.

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    15. Re:What? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I found that meat was expensive (to locals) so that any touristy restaurant would have meat on everything to look better, but the more local places only have any meat in the meat dishes (you can't get vegetarian Beijing Duck). But go into a nice place, order only sides (ones with veggies) and you should have been fine. Sure, no meaty-mains in vegetarian-tofu style, but at least it's not like the southern US where every vegetable dish has a lump of pork in it.

  9. Re:something's not right here by sjames · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, to hell with these so called "handicapped" people and their supposed "prostetics". Kick 'em in the nuts I say!

  10. true Parisian French... by phloe · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Two quotes:

    "... in order to give our children the opportunity to learn true Parisian French..."
    "...my wife and children and I went to McDonalds..."

    he had it coming :/

    1. Re:true Parisian French... by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      Then he learned that "true Parisian French McDonals" means getting beat up, and STILL he complains.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:true Parisian French... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny

      How could he not order a Royale with Cheese?

    3. Re:true Parisian French... by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Because of the metric system?

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  11. I would like to have their version by aepervius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Upon ordering, McDonaldâ(TM)s employees at 140, Avenue Champs Elysees, Paris accosted Mann and tried to tear the glasses out of his head"

    It does not sound like a random attack but employee action. Which brings me to think there was a prior history we were not told, for example he telling them it is a camera, them asking him to remove it, and not believing him when he refuses to switch it off or remove it. It does not excuse employee behavior if they assaulted him really, or manhandled him, but OTOH he cannot film random passerby or customer in a premise at will. And I am willing to bet that it was the bone the employee had. OTOH it could be simply dumb people doing dumb things, but I am always very very warry when somebody tell employee attacked them without reason. Random thug attack without reason. Employee not so much. (again i am not saying those reason were not valid, but that we hear only one side here).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:I would like to have their version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Generally:

      - in private places, it is illegal to take photos of people without their consent, whether or not such photos are published;
      - in public places, it is legal to take photos of people without their consent, but (depending on the context etc.) dissemination or publication of those photos may be counter to the individuals' right to privacy;
      - it is illegal to publish (but not illegal to take) photos of acts of violence (murder, assault, etc.).

      McDonalds allows the public to pass through their premises without obstruction or registration. Legally, this makes it a public place.

      Meaning that if a McDonalds employee touched this man for any reason, other than perhaps to detain him until the police arrived, then it is common assault.

    2. Re:I would like to have their version by dr2chase · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is this French law you are quoting? Napoleonic Code and English Common Law are different beasts.

    3. Re:I would like to have their version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Untrue. They are in a public place, he can film or photograph any person he wants. They don't have an expectation of privacy.

    4. Re:I would like to have their version by thesandtiger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what?

      "We do not want you to film our business, employees, or customers. Since you say you cannot stop, you have to leave now or we will have the police escort you out."

      There was absolutely no need to physically touch him to do this. I cannot imagine Mann would refuse to leave if they had made those objections known.

      I don't care what the prior history is unless it includes Mann literally making threats of physical violence against them if they didn't serve him his Royale avec frommage.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    5. Re:I would like to have their version by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      Mod parent down.

      This doesn't give them the right to assault the guy. They could tell him to leave the premises, of course. But to attack someone just because they are violating your business' rules? No.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    6. Re:I would like to have their version by zyzko · · Score: 1

      Generally:

      Yes, generally. But there are places in the world where just taking pictures of people on the street without their consent will get you beaten up. It is wise to check beforehand and obey not just local laws but local customs. I really don't know if restaurants are considered a public or private space in France or do people get generally annoyed if they are filmed in a restaurant (I would, I'd like to eat please, not be a part of someones home movie).

      Geeks are often very black and white in these issues (and sometimes it is /extremely/ important to hold on to your rights) but common courtesy should come first in normal life, and that is what many geeks do not get for some reason.

    7. Re:I would like to have their version by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Please tell me you at least had a chat with the Store Manager since there is no reason to assault someone for tripping the alarm like that.

      1 its a good way for you to decide to refund your purchase
      2 those tags get fiddley anyway and its 50/50 if the tag gets reactivated when you try
      3 what happens if you had a tag from another store (with reverse logic)?

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    8. Re:I would like to have their version by seepho · · Score: 1

      I'm looking forward to when this becomes acceptable in the 'States, thanks to Citizens United. If corporations are people, one should be sure not to order a McDonald's iced tea in a "stand your ground" state.

  12. What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by acidfast7 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This story is borderline plausible.

    I can believe that some Parisians would vigorously defend against photos being take of the interior design/menu.

    I can also believe that someone would wear augmented reality glasses. Furthermore, I can understand that (a) McDonalds employee(s) would automatically react strongly to the camera and try to remove them from someone's head.

    However, what I don't understand is why the subject of the story just didn't leave McDonalds. Honestly, you're in a city full of excellent, and sometimes inexpensive, cuisine.

    Why even go to McDonalds in the first place and why not leave when there's an altercation? Is the 20€ of McDs food worth the hassle?

    1. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by djsmiley · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why, in my 28 years on this earth, following all sorts of awesome technology, I've never actually HEARD of this guy?

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
    2. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

      I've heard of him, he's been around for a while. But, anyone concerned with "Parisian French" wouldn't be dining at McDonalds. This whole thing is ridiculous.

    3. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I dare bet you don't know the tens of thousands of names of other important researchers either.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by profplump · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you suggesting they speak Canadian French at McDonalds in Paris?

    5. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Because your world view is narrow, only following your basic interests, you need to search outside your normal zones. For example, you never followed wearable computing research. Otherwise you would know that Steve Mann and Thad Starner both invented the technology at MIT. Now both are doing separate research and google is simply using their inventions as a design platform for Project Glass.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's irrelevant why he went to McDonalds. Perhaps his daughter longed for something that she was familiar with?

      Also, it appears he had no reason to expect that he would be assaulted - right up to the point that he was - so why would he go elsewhere? It also appears that he had already ordered and received his food by the time the three employees approached him, so his decision to try and reason with them over a total misunderstanding so he can go on with his meal is understandable.

      I doubt the thought of "I will stay and fight for my right to eat McDonalds, and perhaps get assaulted in the process" entered his mind at any point. ;)

    7. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by profplump · · Score: 2

      He's not American. And McDonalds sells high-fat, high-sugar food, not rat poison. You're welcome to not like it and not eat there, but an occasional bit of fried chicken from a fast food joint is not tantamount to child abuse.

    8. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Well, 28 years is not enough to know all the important people on earth I guess.

    9. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Fast food is not a replacement for lazy planning/parenting.

      It can supplement good parenting though. There is nothing wrong with an occasional (as in once in few months) fastfood experience.

    10. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      What's your problem with McDonalds?

      Anyone who has ever seen Pulp Fiction knows that you must go to a McDonalds in Paris to see what the Big Mac is called.

    11. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by profplump · · Score: 1

      No, fast food is a replacement for slow food. "Fast food" is simply the modern marketing term for "cafeteria food", which has been around for a good long time. What any of that has do with children, parenting or planing is not clear to me.

    12. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by pyzondar · · Score: 1

      How about this thing called "A pair of balls", combined with the principle of not bowing down to oppression.

    13. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      Fast food is great from time to time. Why fucking wait and pay more at a proper restaurant?

    14. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I'm a lot more worried about the amount of TV and Disney/Pixar films my daughter's mother lets her watch than I am the occasional extra bit of fat and/or salt.

      So now you know that my child's mother and I no longer live together.

      Is there anything else you'd like to know about my lazy parenting?

      I suppose you'll tell me next that I should kidnap her so that I can exercise 24-hours-a-day control over everything she sees, hears, and eats?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    15. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by C0R1D4N · · Score: 1

      A big mac is always acbig mac. It is the quarter pounder that is different in metric using nations

    16. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Quarter pounder

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    17. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, perhaps Parisian French isn't the mother tongue of the people working at McDonalds, either. It just reeks of positive post-incident justification. Would a British child practice American English at a McDonalds in NYC or LA?

    18. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by HnT · · Score: 1

      However, what I don't understand is why the subject of the story just didn't leave McDonalds. Honestly, you're in a city full of excellent, and sometimes inexpensive, cuisine.
      Why even go to McDonalds in the first place and why not leave when there's an altercation? Is the 20€ of McDs food worth the hassle?

      Clearly you don't have kids who are hooked on Chicken Nuggets and Cheeseburgers...

      --
      "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
    19. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

      time differences ... you may have heard of them? most travelers don't change their sleeping habits when it's only 6 hours forward (3am in Paris = 9p ET)

    20. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Because you are still a kid. Basically, you don't know, what you don't know.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    21. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by zippthorne · · Score: 2

      Why? Given the popularity of McDonalds popular in France (Only the US is a bigger market for them) , I'd say that it's the quintessential french food these days...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    22. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      What do you mean you don't have poutine, eh?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    23. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever had frog legs ... I did last week (in Frankfurt) and they're quite pleasant on a warm day with the proper apéritif.

    24. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Doctor+Jonas · · Score: 1

      Not true. It's called "cuarto de libra" accross all of Spanish-speaking Latin America and most of those countries use the metric system.

    25. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      To be fair, perhaps Parisian French isn't the mother tongue of the people working at McDonalds, either. It just reeks of positive post-incident justification. Would a British child practice American English at a McDonalds in NYC or LA?

      Why not? It's good to get children to practise interacting with people anyway, and even better if they're in a different country. My brother ordered lots of fast food when he was about 6 or 7 and we visited the USA (he was youngest). On occasion, various staff had trouble with "beefburger", "fizzy drink", "juice" and "tomato sauce". However, the staff were almost always pleased to talk to a British child.

      (Last year I had trouble in a Subway in New Orleans, and I was 25. "Yeah, just tomatoes" "Say what?" "Tomatoes" "What?" "Um... tomatoes?" "I can't understand you" "I'm pointing. Or you choose, I really don't mind" "I'm sorry sir, I can't understand you" "Oh! Toe-may-toes!" "If you wanted toe-may-toes why didn't you say so?".)

    26. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Anyone who's watched Pulp Fiction would know that the burger in question is the Quarter Pounder, not the Big Mac. (France is metric, remember?)

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    27. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 1

      You have a right to your opinion. But guess what? You only out yourself as a pretentious douchebag when you continually harp on the guy for his choice in dining. Who the hell are you exactly to question him or his choices, or talk as if you've any business judging him for those choices? That there are other places to eat, and whether or not *you* deem them as better doesn't enter the equation, because it is all personal choice and subjective. You make it worse when you seem to somehow equate your personal distaste with his choice with justifying his treatment at said establishment.

    28. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 2

      That was one of the things that surprised me when I visited Paris. The French really do like McDonald's. The place was packed and it wasn't because of tourists.

    29. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Why eat at mcdonalds? he was with his kids. They might cry if forced into a nice restaurant.

    30. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by aitikin · · Score: 1

      I would think so. American English is going to be more accurate in McDonald's than some upscale French restaurant or some Mexican place, or, for that matter, most other fast food chains. In my area (where there are a large number of non-English speakers and poor English speakers), McDonald's always seems to have someone who speaks the language fluently behind the counter. I can't say the same about Burger King, Taco Bell (although I'd be upset if I could about Taco Bell), Wendy's, KFC/A&W, or any of the other fast food places nearby.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    31. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by morari · · Score: 1

      My first thought was: Why even go into a McDonald's? They're disgusting enough in the States, let alone when surrounded by the plethora of fine dining throughout Paris. It just stinks of consumer conditioning, frankly.

      My second thought was: This guy is a coward. Why would he show off his medical papers to every asshole who looked at him funny? He can explain the presence of the glasses, their use, and move on. Unless it's airport security or something, no one really needs to see his doctor's excuse. Following up on that, this guy allowed himself to be manhandled, his device potentially damaged, and then just stands around talking and snapping picture for passive aggressive internet rants later? Please. Those minimum-wage fucks should have had their asses kicked. That right there is what's wrong with the world and exactly why people think they can do the things they do... because no one stops them.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    32. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      Why even go to McDonalds in the first place and why not leave when there's an altercation? Is the 20â of McDs food worth the hassle?

      Why ask stupid questions that have nothing to do with the meat of the story?

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    33. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Rostin · · Score: 1

      The way people assume that their upbringing was "normal" is always interesting to me. I grew up in a lower middle class home. Both my parents grew up on farms, and their parents lived through the depression, so they were quite frugal. My mom also quit her job when I was born to raise my sister and I. We rarely ate out, and my parents haven't set foot in a McDonalds or Burger King in my living memory. Consequently, I had eaten at places like that maybe 5 times before I headed off to college. It's not because they were health nuts (We bought beef by the half carcass from a local processor and ate it with starchy vegetables in one form or another almost every day). They simply didn't like the food that those places served, and they refused to take us to them.

      This is somewhat of an aside, but a few years ago, I was standing in line to pick up my pass for a 3-day music festival, and the college-age woman in front of me was on the phone to her dad. From what I overheard, I gathered that her father had gotten her the ticket for her birthday. She told him that she had heard from someone else in line that she might need the credit card used to purchase the tickets in order to pick them up, rather than just the printed receipt. The father was refusing to give it to her, apparently concerned about what she'd do with it afterward. She whined and begged and pleaded until finally he relented.

      It was a very strange experience for me. I honestly can't imagine ever asking my parents for something more than once, let alone hounding them like that, especially as an adult, and especially my dad. I learned at a very young age that their "No" was final.

    34. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Because it isn't fucking disgusting?

      I can go to an Indian buffet or get Phad Thai or a gyro for $4 to $8. Why would I spend the same on a big mac, a thing of sugar water, and greasy fries.

      People's taste buds are all kinds of fucked up these days.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    35. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by usuallylost · · Score: 1

      As far as the dining at McDonald's part goes you see that a lot when people travel abroad. They eat all sorts of strange cuisine and after a few days they just want something similar to what they get at home. In my mind he should have left when the first person asked him about his head gear, forcing him to present his papers. I am sorry but fast food employees don't get to question me about anything beyond do you want fries with that. Perhaps he was on vacation and tired and didn't want to deal with it. Perhaps he was just tired and wanted to eat. Whatever the case his first warning was the first unreasonable question from a fast food cashier. He should have turned and walked out then.

      It looks to me like nobody in France is taking this seriously because he didn't take it seriously. It sounds like he just went about his business and called some people. He treated it like some sort of customer service problem. If he wanted this to be taken seriously he could have called the police and emergency services from right outside the restaurant. All he really had to do then was say they attacked him and his head is hurting and he is feeling dizzy. He has pictures of the guys. If he had made a scene, with police and rescue personnel, my guess is they would have had to take statements and investigated right there. Witnesses may have still been present. Basically he is coming back later and saying "they were mean to me" and wondering why nobody cares. I mean how can they investigate this now? All he has is his story and a couple of pictures at this point. If nothing else having cops and an ambulance parked out front would cost that guy a bunch of business while they looked into it. Even if that was the only satisfaction you got it would be something. Perhaps he didn't want to be bothered on his vacation or didn't want to escalate the thing with his kid there?

      Just out of curiosity why is he blanking out the perpetrators faces? Who cares if guys who roughed you up are happy?

    36. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The total amount of tv/movies, sure, I understand. But what's wrong with Pixar? At least there's some art to their craft.

    37. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Honestly, you're in a city full of excellent, and sometimes inexpensive, cuisine.

      I don't think I've ever heard of something in Paris being accused of being inexpensive! Especially on the Camps Elysee. The most expensive bottle of coke I've ever had was at a seemingly cheap place there (at a mere $8 for a half liter)
      What would you do, if the owner of the restaurant suddenly grabbed your hair and tried to rip it out of your head? Just get up and leave? I doubt it.

    38. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      However, what I don't understand is why the subject of the story just didn't leave McDonalds.

      Absolutely. It's his moral responsibility not to offend others' sensibilities with the medical device permanently attached to his body. Why would he expect to be able to eat at the same facilities as non-cripples? You don't see people with artificial limbs politely asking for permission to be treated like regular humans, so what makes him think he deserves those rights?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    39. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      However, what I don't understand is why the subject of the story just didn't leave McDonalds.

      In the first case, the American woman with the camera was manhandled and physically pinned against the wall, because the McDonald female employee wanted her picture deleted from her camera (a picture the American woman claims she had not taken, she had only taken a picture of the menu, not the employee, not that there was much communication going on between the two, the American woman didn't know a word of French, nor did the French female employee know a word of English).

      In the second case, regarding the prosthetic eye-ware, the story doesn't really tell us the details of what happened, only the summary does (which I generally don't trust), but I suspect a similar thing happened. Leaving the McDonalds is probably a natural response anyone would take, but if some idiotic angry person really thinks you've "stolen" their image somehow, your leaving is precisely what might get them to assault you.

      Frankly, the McDonald corporate branch in France should have handled this better the second time around. In the US, Starbucks had a corporate policy of not allowing people to take pictures inside their coffee shops, but once this policy became of public interest and everybody started pictures inside their stores, they immediately reversed their policy, just went with the flow, and even encouraged their barristas to pose for pictures.

      Now I understand, it's probably not McDonalds corporate policy that triggered those incidents, but after the first camera incident at least, McDonald should have just assumed that more clueless American and more clueless Canadian tourists were going to try to take pictures of their menu boards (just to compare with the menus from back home), and at the very least, it should have dictated a clear hands-off, no manhandling, policy to their employees of their customers (even if they've already supposedly "stolen" an image of you in the public space).

    40. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What any of that has do with children, parenting or planing is not clear to me.

      Me neither. The furniture in McD's is all moulded plastic.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    41. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of dickheads who like, well, being dickheads just for the fun of it, especially when it's odds on that the victim is incapable of fighting back.

      They probably planned to warm the food up, sell it to someone else and pocket the money.

      Actually, that's ridiculous. As if they'd warm it up!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    42. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Browse at +4, then you don't need to scroll at all.

    43. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      Sorry I didn't get it - did you say tomatoes and they say tomatoes? or did you say toe-mat-oes??

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    44. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      They have no poutine at the New Youk Fries in Dubai. They did have fatoosh fries... but now they have butter chicken fries. Do they have poutine fries in the US or are they just trying to appeal to us Canadians?!

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    45. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      He's not American

      Sure, but you don't really think the average America-hating McDonalds security thug grass the relatively subtle differences between a Canadian and US accent?

    46. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by Lisias · · Score: 1

      However, what I don't understand is why the subject of the story just didn't leave McDonalds. Honestly, you're in a city full of excellent, and sometimes inexpensive, cuisine.

      Perhaps because he thought he's right and decided to stand his ground?

      Perhaps because he was with his family, and thought that feeding them before leaving was a good idea?

      Perhaps because he know that if you low your head today, you will end up raising your ass tomorrow?

      You see, there're people that thinks everybody should fight for their rights, no matter how little is the cause.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    47. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by trigpoint · · Score: 1

      and "tomato sauce".

      Thats where my French fell apart in a French McDonalds. Had ordered the food perfectly and was asked what sauce for the Nuggets, my answer "Tomate". Total blank look, then I said "Ketchup". Up to then had never occured to me that Tomato Sauce and Ketchup are not interchangable everywhere. They sell beer in McDonalds in France.

    48. Re:What I don't understand ... why just not leave? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      There are times when "fast food" is a $500 savings over a real restaurant, and a restaurant isn't any better nutritionally, they are just so expensive that the infrequency makes them less of a problem, not the content.

  13. Re:France has a problem by zero.kalvin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Definetly not! Perp 1 might be an arab, but 2 and 3 are not. Beside your assumption on skin is wrong, because while north african arabs are dark skinned, middle eastern ( Palastenian, lebanese and Syrian ) arabs vary from dark skin to extreemly white skin. You'd be surprised by some of my blue eyed blonde hair arab friends!

  14. Even people who wear dork glasses and... by voss · · Score: 1

    carry fake notes should not be assasulted. At most they should be asked to leave the premises or detained while police are called if a crime is suspected.

    1. Re:Even people who wear dork glasses and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You should be assaulted for starting your post in the subject line and finishing it in the comment field.

    2. Re:Even people who wear dork glasses and... by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      It is illegal for anyone who is not a police officer to detain another person. There is no such thing as a "citizen's arrest". Even security guards, in a shop where---for example---you have allegedly shoplifted, can't tell you to follow them into a room. They can ask you to come with, but they can't force you.

      Even if they saw you do it. Even if they videotaped it. Only police/gendarmerie can do that.

    3. Re:Even people who wear dork glasses and... by CrashandDie · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself: "There's no such thing in France."

    4. Re:Even people who wear dork glasses and... by LocalH · · Score: 1

      Not sure about France, but for the US you should look up "shopkeeper's privilege".

      --
      FC Closer
  15. Re:France has a problem by slim · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't get confused, I am not being racist

    Yes you are.

  16. Re:France has a problem by lookatmyhorse · · Score: 1

    they are not foreigners as they are all born in France. The European low class immigrants are on the second or third generation already.

  17. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is how it starts. The first blows in the war between Augmented Humans and the Naturals.

    Keep humanity free from machines!

    Be pure, be vigilant, behave!

  18. The full story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He tried to order a Quarter Pounder with cheese and refused to call it a Royale with cheese.

    Clearly it was his own fault...

    1. Re:The full story by bindo · · Score: 1

      No.
      its clear to all that what you describe ends with a bullet through your head.

    2. Re:The full story by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I heard he was whistling Rite of Spring and started a riot.

    3. Re:The full story by idontgno · · Score: 1

      The line between "whistling tunelessly" and "whistling Stravinsky" is very fine...

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  19. Re:Mc D. in Paris, really! by jampola · · Score: 1

    That's a bit rough, mate! You obviously don't have kids, do you? "Mummmm, Daaaddddd, Can we have Maccas???? PPLLEEEAASSEE?????"

    Besides, My folks used to take me to Micky D's all the time...and 15 years later I speak 3 languages. Not to blow my own horn but I turned out alright (and I'm not even overweight!....yet)

  20. Facebook blocked the link. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is facebook blocking this link for being spammy? Seems really weird seeing all the other junk that is postable there.

  21. Re:France has a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Arabs or blacks? They are always them in Paris in this kind of incident.

    Don't get confused, I am not being racist, and I don't mean all the arabs or blacks do these things, what I mean is that the 95% of people who do that in Paris (in Paris, I don't mean other cities or countries, which I don't know), are arabs or blacks.

    When I was there I saw lots and lots of incidents like that.

    They are almost certainly Muslims, and naturally assume that the guy with glasses is from the security services and interested in their terrorist plots. Hopefully the real security services are monitoring them undetected.

    So, it seems that not only does McDonalds in Paris have some strange issues with cameras, but judging from these comments, a surprising number of French people are racist.

  22. Re:something's not right here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is an experimental device designed by and available to a single MIT researcher. The purported opinion of one medical professional carries little weight - assuming this opinion is even relevant, for it could have simply been "this device may help him see some stuff slightly better". Hell, I have RSI and an assistance monkey would help me carry stuff around, but I don't expect establishments around the world to admit an assistance monkey just because I can afford one.

    In particular, the device has the ability to take pictures in a way which may be contrary to French law, something the OP took delight in (accidentally?) admitting on his web page.

  23. Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    However, what I don't understand is why the subject of the story just didn't leave McDonalds. Honestly, you're in a city full of excellent, and sometimes inexpensive, cuisine. Why even go to McDonalds in the first place

    Well from the summary:

    He was assaulted by three men during his visit to get food with his family.

    Maybe his kids saw it and they wanted American food and it was too late and he was too tired to resist them? Just because someone has different food tastes than you doesn't make their story implausible. "So I was stopping at a Swedish place to get some lutefisk ..." who fucking cares where it was or what he was eating? Also, sometimes chain restaurants are much better in foreign countries. Try the Pizza Hut on Grand Cayman sometime, they are crazy amazing (I think because the food has to all be grown locally).

    and why not leave when there's an altercation? Is the 20€ of McDs food worth the hassle?

    I know, it's weird, it's almost like he thought he had a right to be there or something. Crazy fucking Canadians and their "rights."

    "Hey dad how come you gave those men money and then they showed some muscle so we left without eating? Now I'm hungry and you kinda look like a pussy."

  24. Re:France has a problem by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The conclusion from the reddit thread on this incident was that the attackers were McDonalds employees, and were reacting against community oposition to a McDonalds in that location. Apparently there are issues with local people using cameras to collect evidence and the McDonalds have a hair trigger response to that activity.

  25. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually the fucking French can be quite fun, in particular the females. It's the non-fucking French that you want to stay away from.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  26. Doesn't Augmediated Reality need Reality first? by mister2au · · Score: 1

    Undoubtedly brilliant but damn what a weirdo !! The whole tone of the blog is just weird ...

    The strangest thing out of the whole story (to me at least) was that he is married and has kids !!!

    1. Re:Doesn't Augmediated Reality need Reality first? by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Ok. So this is the level that /. has sunk to, where nearly every poster says they have not heard of Steve Mann. Maybe it's time I left this place; I no longer belong.

    2. Re:Doesn't Augmediated Reality need Reality first? by mister2au · · Score: 1

      I think you'll be fine ... Hardly anyone has said they haven't heard of him ...

      although i confess I only know of him from the novelty value when he hits the press every 5 years and I always thought his glasses from 10 years or so ago were just a short-term experiment.

      It's been a long time since the VR boom/rage of 90s (nearly 20 years already) so most of his work has been COMPLETELY irrelevant to most people here - at least until Google revived interest again recently

    3. Re:Doesn't Augmediated Reality need Reality first? by chebucto · · Score: 1

      To be honest I knew of him, but only by the name 'Captain Cyborg'. I'll go ahead and blame El Reg for that ;)

      Still, Slashdot posted the story in record time - that's a positive, right?

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
    4. Re:Doesn't Augmediated Reality need Reality first? by Yosho · · Score: 1

      The strangest thing out of the whole story (to me at least) was that he is married and has kids !!!

      Why is that so strange?

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  27. Re:France has a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am not French, but I have lived there for 2 years. And if you lived there you would know what I mean.

    For example, I have lived in London for 1 year, and there the problem are not arabs or blacks, the violent and problematic people are skinheads and chavs. Just to prove you that I am not racist. But there in America you think that saying that is racist, but it is not, as it is nothing related to the color of the sking but the culture I guess.

  28. What is McDonald's? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 2

    I have read somewhere that McDonald's is NOT a corporate entity. It is instead a trade mark and business model that can be licensed by anybody willing to become local McDonald's. If so, it's futile to look for McDonald's representative a.s.o. - they have no relation with this specific McDonald's except collecting the license fees. The local police is the only place to ask for help.

    1. Re:What is McDonald's? by Mithent · · Score: 2

      McDonald's operates franchises, yes. However, it appears that franchisors are sometimes liable for their franchisees' actions (I have no idea if that would be the case here). And even if they're not legally liable, McDonald's may want to protect their brand identity by dissociating themselves from abusive behaviour towards customers and thus pursue the complaint with the franchisee, I don't know.

    2. Re:What is McDonald's? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2

      McDonalds keeps a *very* tight leash on its franchised restaurants - someone else may own them, but they are absorbed directly into the management structure of the overall company and higher tier regional managers have all the same abilities that they would in normal restaurants. Franchise owners get a cut of the profits.

    3. Re:What is McDonald's? by blackicye · · Score: 1

      I have read somewhere that McDonald's is NOT a corporate entity. It is instead a trade mark and business model that can be licensed by anybody willing to become local McDonald's. If so, it's futile to look for McDonald's representative a.s.o. - they have no relation with this specific McDonald's except collecting the license fees. The local police is the only place to ask for help.

      Yet I am fairly certain that when you introduce the McShitburger as your new seasonal menu special, or decide to apply pedobear wallpaper to the interior of your franchise it will not fly for long.

      Less drastically if you decide to change the corporate colours of your "restaurant" to pink and purple it probably wouldn't fly either. Same goes for beating up paying customers, augmented, handicapped or otherwise.

  29. He's not just a researcher... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

    He is the guy who INVENTED wearable computing and all the technology behind Project Glass.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:He's not just a researcher... by Apuleius · · Score: 1

      Starner and Mann worked together at the MIT media lab.

    2. Re:He's not just a researcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly as long as Mann, they did their Masters thesis on the technology they invented together.
      Dig in further, the original Idea was with Mann as he had a goal first of making computer augmented vision that erased advertisements from your vision. That was the genesis he presented to his friend Thad one night playing D&D and drinking beer.

      So yes really.

    3. Re:He's not just a researcher... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Did NOT INVENT wearable computing. Wearable computing has been an idea for a very long time, we have been waiting for technology to catch up.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:He's not just a researcher... by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Because of the suspicious number of anonymous trolls like you all trying to smear the guy, innocent readers may think there's something to the trolling.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    5. Re:He's not just a researcher... by jheath314 · · Score: 1

      I've had the privilege of meeting Steve Mann (he lectures at the University I attended, so I sat in one some of his lectures and talked to him after class a bit). He quite literally wrote the book on wearable computers (http://wearcam.org/cyborg.htm), and a good portion of the book covers the hostile reactions people have to someone wearing conspicuous recording devices.

      Come to think of it, I've previously commented on /. about my gut reaction upon first encountering Steve Mann wearing his glasses (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2943031&cid=40478747). In short, I found the experience to be rather unsettling, despite the fact that Dr. Mann is a really nice guy. The cameras are mounted on the surface of his glasses right in front of his eyes, which really interferes with eye-contact. As social creatures, eye-contact is hugely important in establishing rapport... deliberately taking that away generates a surprising amount of animosity at a subconscious level.

      That said, I am in no way trying to justify the actions of the thugs who assaulted Dr. Mann. I hope they get punished appropriately.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
  30. Re:something's not right here by Mithent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not wanting to admit you is a bit different from assaulting you (assuming the story is true).

  31. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

    Hey AC ... you need to know what battle is worth fighting and this isn't one of them. Asserting your right to dine somewhere, when you have pretty damn unique glasses that look like a camera to most people (especially McDonalds employeed, which aren't so tech savvy) is "losing the forest for the trees."

    I also have a very hard time believing that Pizza Hut on Grand Cayman is better than a real Pizzeria using the same locally grown stuff, but whatever makes you justify the fast-food experience is OK with me (not really)

  32. Re:Are you real? by Altesse · · Score: 1

    If you're talking about Mohammed Merah, you dumb fuck, he was 'was shot in the head by a police sniper' (Wikipedia link). The RAID (equivalent of SWAT) assaulted him and neutralized him. How is that for 'dare not touch' ?

    While it is true that there are suburban areas in France where cops cannot do much, because they are outnumbered (and outgunned !) by the residents -- but like every major city in the world, tell me it's different in New York or Miami -- the french police never, ever let a killer on the loose, especially when he kills kids.

  33. Re:France has a problem by erroneus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow. Useful information. I was quite curious as to what the motivation might have been behind the behavior and I was less concerned about "who" or what "types" of who did the assault and property damage.

    And now I see what was behind it. These guys were ALL seemingly of middle-eastern origins but that's NOT the issue. I think the more important issue was that they were defending something. I find it quite likely that these men had some stake in the success of their business and felt they were defending it in some way. Ethnicity or origins are not quite relevant to the story unless you are interested in painting a picture suggesting that "X people are violent" which is true... X people are violent... hell *I* am violent... or I have been until I learned to chill a bit more. The issue is what motivates violence.

    And the motivation becomes more clear. They saw this guy as an assault on their unofficial camera ban and wanted the camera removed. Let's not go into the stpudity of trying to conceal truth as revealed by photons bouncing off of objects.

  34. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My vision is augmented.

  35. Go for french cuisine the next time by macson_g · · Score: 5, Funny

    If someone physically is present in Paris and still goes to McDonalds to get his meal, then he deservers to be assaulted :)

    1. Re:Go for french cuisine the next time by tbird81 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Maybe he's not an elitist douchebag? (Although that crap he said about learning "Parisian French" sort of destroys that argument.)

    2. Re:Go for french cuisine the next time by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's not an elitist douchebag? (Although that crap he said about learning "Parisian French" sort of destroys that argument.)

      well sounds to me he got exactly what he was looking for, true parisian french.

      going by the numbers, michelin restaurants are _not_ true french anyhow compared to mcd.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Go for french cuisine the next time by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      He was with his CHILDREN you asshole. His CHILDREN likely wanted McDonalds, and wanted to practice their french with a menu they were familiar with. Children can often be picky about food, and can prefer something they already know.

      You're right, he brought children into a McDonalds! He deserves TO BE PHYSICALLY ASSAULTED. (Its not like McDonalds caters to children with playgrounds or anything, oh wait...)

      Who the hell do you think you are?

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    4. Re:Go for french cuisine the next time by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was sick of snails, goose liver paste, and wine, and just wanted a taste of home.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Go for french cuisine the next time by macson_g · · Score: 1

      Anyone eating in McDonalds is a mo^H^H person of poor taste.

      Anyone eating in McDonalds while in Paris is a major moron, watching the toilet flush while visiting visiting Niagara Falls etc etc.

      Anyone taking children to McDonalds is guilty of teaching them a very bad nutritional habits, and - in long run - inducing a physical damage on them.

      And we are talking scientist here, a man who is supposed to be a paragon; an educator. Not some half-brain, "I'm gonna spend all 5 days of my annual leave in the europes".

      Don't you people understand that one of the comicalities of the opening scene of Pulp Fiction is that the guy just got back from Europe, and the only story he has to tell is related to him visiting McDonalds?

    6. Re:Go for french cuisine the next time by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      You're extremely small minded, and you're a jerk.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    7. Re:Go for french cuisine the next time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Steve Mann is from Canada. He's probably making the distinction between Parisian French and Quebecois French.

    8. Re:Go for french cuisine the next time by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Only the fries are assaulted.

    9. Re:Go for french cuisine the next time by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I am more than willing to bet that somewhere, in your life, is a habit that would be considered unhealthy, embarrassing, or simply not perfect.
      Mellow out dude.Everyone likes to relax in different ways.

  36. Re:something's not right here by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    So he provided this information, sat down, and then, out of the blue:

    Subsequently another person within McDonalds physically assaulted me,

    This report sounds like bad fiction from someone with a gigantic ego and an armchair law degree:

    Is McDonald's France trolling /.?

    Seriously I can't believe the number of AC commenters saying the most ridiculous statements on here.

    If you took a minute to RTFA you would see he was stopped by employees early on, but they accepted the documentation he had:
    "while we were standing in line at McDonalds, I was stopped by .... a McDonalds employee, and he asked about my eyeglass (digital computer vision system, i.e. EyeTap). ..... I had brought with me the letter from my doctor regarding my computer vision eyeglass, ... I showed this doctor's letter and the documentation to the purported McDonalds employee ....After reviewing the documentation, the purported McDonalds employee accepted me (and my family) as a customer, and left us to place our order. In what follows, I will refer to this person as "Possible Witness 1". "

    I will say his writing sucks. It's written more like a police report than the blog that it is. He should really rewrite it.

    And he should just show pictures of their faces, how are we suppose to identify them without faces?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  37. Re:something's not right here by f3rret · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is an experimental device designed by and available to a single MIT researcher. The purported opinion of one medical professional carries little weight - assuming this opinion is even relevant, for it could have simply been "this device may help him see some stuff slightly better". Hell, I have RSI and an assistance monkey would help me carry stuff around, but I don't expect establishments around the world to admit an assistance monkey just because I can afford one.

    In particular, the device has the ability to take pictures in a way which may be contrary to French law, something the OP took delight in (accidentally?) admitting on his web page.

    What? You could have your own personal monkey butler? And you don't already have one?

    The hell is wrong with you?

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  38. Re:Either this story misses a lot of details or by cheros · · Score: 1

    I was wondering about that too. Cutting a long story short, someone has been assaulted. As far as I know, assaulting someone is not the standard greeting you ought to expect, especially not on company premises - I find that a rather worrying thing to happen, and in the unlikely event I find myself in the need of junk food it would make me wonder about visiting McDonalds.

    On the other hand, we only have one side of the story - it appears they are rather sensitive to anything that looks like a camera, but where would that stop? Ordinary glasses? Hearing aids? Walking sticks OK?

    The police not being interested is sadly not a new problem..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  39. Re:Mc D. in Paris, really! by profplump · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clearly anyone eating a single meal ever at McDonalds is an unfit parent and gastronomical philistine.

    It's not even possible that they just wanted some quick, familiar food on their way home after a full day experiencing whatever you think qualifies as "real" Paris.

  40. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's not legal to videotape/shoot photos inside of a McDonalds and the employees overreacted to this ... that's my point ... and you missed it ... completely.

  41. Re:Are you real? by rve · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Funny that you seem to think of Miami as a major city, but that is not the only part of your statement I disagree with. It is NOT normal in major cities in the developed world to have areas where the police doesn't dare to go. If this happens in peace time, it is a serious breakdown in society. The fact that you seem to have come to think of it as normal is very troubling indeed.

  42. Re:France has a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it is true that Arabs or blacks are responsible for most of the violence in Paris (I do not know if it is true) than it is a fact. If it is a fact, it is not a racism to mention it.

    Racist would hate all Arabs or black.
    Racist would never approve his child marrying an Arab or black.
    But free man can talk about facts without being racist.

    Personally, I like Arabs and their culture and as far as I know, they have nothing to do with the incident.

  43. Re:France has a problem by bipbop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What kind of bullshit moderation is this? +1 Informative? And it's not just this comment. Throughout the comments on this story, I see ignorance, racism, and bullshit not only posted but modded up.

    I guess I'll be meta-moderating more often.

  44. Re:Are you real? by Altesse · · Score: 1

    Ok.

    In this list of US urban areas, Miami comes as 4th. Not major enough ?
    Please read again my statement. Where did I say it was normal ? I just wanted to express my opinion to the OP that it was not a France-related problem, but was, alas !, a global problem, not uncommon.

    The fact that you seem to make bold claims without taking care to read the others' posts is troubling too.

  45. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by Dynamoo · · Score: 1
    A French McDonalds isn't the same as a North American McDonalds. If you're a McDonald's fan then it's kind of interesting to see the difference.

    And remember, one thing about the French is that they eat an awful lot of French food.. all the time.

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
  46. Not in this particular case by Weezul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is definitely a huge race problem in France, largely perpetuated by the minorities themselves, but this was McDonalds employees assaulting him. They should all do jail time and McDonalds should be forced to pay him a large settlement.

    In principle, the French speak with people they don't know on the street because the French are a moderately sociable people. Anglophones are actually pathologically anti-social.

    There is however an Arabic street culture that goes way beyond simply being sociable and quickly become harassment, usually harassment of women. France has this problem worse than most European countries because they took Arabic immigrants in large groups and confined them in ghettos.

    You'll witness a tiny amount of harassment in Turkey or maybe Greece, namely the cabs obnoxiously honk at you, scary but no big deal. In Morocco, I've been followed for hours by a scary guy asking to be our guid.

    In France, these Arab guys mostly just harass women on the street. You'll never even notice them if you're male and don't leave a bar with a woman. I've occasionally witnessed French Arabs trying to pick fights with non-Arab men, but overall they're probably less violent that Brits or Americans from Boston. Bostonians and Brits are by far the most violent men I've seen anyplace.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:Not in this particular case by Inda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's no longer true (about the British).

      I haven't seen a proper fight here in twenty years. And I was involved in that one.

      I've never seen a football related fight, but I only travel to half a dozen games a year.

      My social circle contains a lot of undesirables. Violence is still rare.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:Not in this particular case by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      There is however an Arabic street culture that goes way beyond simply being sociable and quickly become harassment, usually harassment of women. France has this problem worse than most European countries because they took Arabic immigrants in large groups and confined them in ghettos.

      Of course it has nothing to do with the French colonies in Africa: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_colonial_empire
      It also has nothing to do that, perhaps, the immigrants prefer to be among their own and created their own ghettos, like the Jews did in larger cities early in the 20th century. Ever seen Arabs applying their own sociable culture upon gay men in a largely tolerant city? Fun to watch, really. Also amusing how my wife is a whore in their eyes because she hardly ever covers her head or face.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    3. Re:Not in this particular case by Apuleius · · Score: 1

      "Bostonians and Brits are by far the most violent men I've seen anyplace."

      Just what do you do when you come to Boston?

      I've been here 20 years. Got my stuff stolen a few times, but I've only even seen one fight, let alone been in one.

    4. Re:Not in this particular case by renoX · · Score: 1

      > There is definitely a huge race problem in France, largely perpetuated by the minorities themselves

      The 'largely perpetuated by the minorities themselves' is an oversimplification which is nearly racist..

      >They should all do jail time and McDonalds should be forced to pay him a large settlement.

      Agree for the jail time, but how is the company McDonalds responsible for their employee illegal behaviour?
      They're only responsible if they fail to react to the problem which is much too early to say..

    5. Re:Not in this particular case by ccguy · · Score: 1

      That's no longer true (about the British).
      ..
      I've never seen a football related fight

      Seriously, if there's a football related fight chances of a British hooligan being involved is extremely likely. It seems however that the worst of the worst just prefer to travel overseas with the excuse of whatever European game is available.
      It also happens that usually the British TV (and authorities) doesn't show the footage, or if they do, they blame the other fans.
      The only country that seems to have more violent supporters are the Turkish, and whenever there's a game between a British and a Turkish game you can expect lots of injured.
      Of course I'm only talking about the supporters that travel with the team, I'm sure most supporters are just fine. But it's not what you export and what the rest of the world see.

    6. Re:Not in this particular case by Weezul · · Score: 1

      U.K. is the only country I've ever witnessed a guy with a PhD get into a fight, although I've seen a Bostonian PhD with bruises. I've seen several street fights in Manchester and Birmingham. I've been mugged in Manchester. I've only been threatened with a fight in Boston.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    7. Re:Not in this particular case by Weezul · · Score: 1

      If you read my comment, you'll notice that I blamed the French for creating the problem originally. Yet, today France makes extensive effort to integrate their immigrants subcultures, meaning these subcultures should take the blame for not integrating.

      McDonalds is very probably responsible for creating the atmosphere that led to this incident, probably not the U.S. based McDonalds corporation, but certainly the specific franchise created the fear of journalists that caused this, and McDonalds France is ultimately responsible for that.

      Huge corporations should be fined huge sums when their employees commit violence on the corporation's behalf because otherwise you'll create subtle incentives to use violence to protect corporate interests.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    8. Re:Not in this particular case by Mysticeti · · Score: 2

      Weezul must have had a bad experience. His sample size is woefully inadequate to make such sweeping generalizations about Boston but at least three times in this thread he's made such remarks.

      For the record, Boston is not in the top 20 U.S. cities when it comes to violent crime: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_cities_by_crime_rate

    9. Re:Not in this particular case by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      Visiting Boston for work - decided to take in a baseball game at Fenway park with my compadres...in the cheap seats.

      It was the Boston Red Sox vs. the Chicago White Sox (I want to say 1999 season?)

      Red Sox win...game is over and the people including my fellow work buddies are surging towards the gate - and I witness the most violent confrontations between drunk and apparently wildly happy Red Sox fans. They are punching, shoving, tripping and kicking each other, and several knock down drag outs ensue. Did I mention this was coming out of the cheap seats? Cops/security nowhere in sight.

      We all circled the wagons and kept the more wildly stupid at a distance as we made our way to the exit.

      So, yeah, I can relate.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  47. Re:France has a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The correct way to phrase a racist statement like this is as follows.

    "I am not a racist, but..."

  48. Re:Are you real? by rve · · Score: 1

    Please read again my statement. Where did I say it was normal ? I just wanted to express my opinion to the OP that it was not a France-related problem, but was, alas !, a global problem, not uncommon.

    A global problem if you wish to compare your capital with the likes of Bogota, Lagos or Port-au-prince, perhaps, but do you think this could happen in Spain, Germany, Switzerland, Luxemburg, Belgium or the UK to name some countries in the same region? Think about.

  49. Re:France has a problem by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Informative

    Behold! Chrisq feels the need to tell everyone just how much of a racist fuck he is. You are the problem, not the Muslims.

    Behold dave420 feels the need to show everyone what an idiot he is. I have not mentioned race at all. You don't even know what race I am. White Muslims are Just as Capable and likely to be terrorists as brown ones, and there are plenty of brown victims, the peaceful Coptic Christians for example

  50. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    Yeah? 'Pretty damn unique glasses' is a valid reason to discriminate at a public restaurant? Tell me, where did McDonald's post the nonuniqueness requirement for glasses on that building's entrance?

    Absolutely! All restaurants are private premises, and the owners/operators *always* reserve the right to ask *any* customer to leave for a variety of reasons. Nobody has a *right* to be served in any restaurant, likely anywhere in the world I'd say.

    Probably, it would be enough if the employees felt that he was causing a disturbance to the other customers, or was about to do so.

  51. Re:France has a problem by Weezul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have you ever been to France? They basically confined their Arabic minorities in ghettos for a generation, which prevented those minorities from acquiring French culture and turned their native north african street-harasment-of-women culture into something really nasty. It's still less nasty than Boston or England's bar fight culture, but it's still nasty.

    I know about 10 people non-French who say they became racist by living in France. I've repeatedly explained that it really isn't race, but that does nothing once you've lived with rampant street harassment for six months.

    In fact, the French themselves largely understand this isn't a racial issue, but an accident of history. That's why they pass laws like banning headscarfs in schools to try to force the immigrants they kept apart for a generation to integrate now.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  52. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by alex67500 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Où sont mes points de modération quand j'en ai besoin ?

  53. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Weezul · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is actually a traditional french solution to this problem : Burn down McDonalds.

    I'm disappointed that no McDonalds were burned while I lived in Paris. Where is their sense of patriotism?

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  54. Re:France has a problem by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    So you use a British Comedy to illustrate the fact that French are racists?

    You may not be racist, but you are stupid for sure.

  55. Re:France has a problem by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Burkha ban. Look it up.

    Burkha ban is a proof that the banners are racists? Since when?

  56. Re:Are you real? by Altesse · · Score: 1

    The dark side of Europe's suburbs.
    In under one minute of Google search. Please.

  57. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by flyneye · · Score: 2

    It is not necessary to know the backgrounds or the ethnicity, it would be nice to know the addresses though, in case one needed a victim when abroad.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  58. Slashdotted by colfer · · Score: 2

    Here's another link, with a picture of the perps. The comments suggest "The French hate paparazzi" as well. http://techcrunch.com/2012/07/16/augmented-reality-explorer-steve-mann-assaulted-at-parisian-mcdonalds/

    1. Re:Slashdotted by nschubach · · Score: 1

      That same picture is in the second link of the summary... it's also the source for that story and the origin of the photo and quotes. I don't know what else that link has that the second link does not already describe.... besides ads.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:Slashdotted by colfer · · Score: 1

      In response, the original was slashdotted. I just took the first Google result. It did have interesting comments, but I suppose Reddit had more.

  59. Re:Douchebags by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Whoa, whoa, wait, it's become a crime to look like a dork and is grounds to be beat up at leisure by anyone who wants to? So all the schoolyard bullies we met during our time were right?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  60. Re:France has a problem by bLanark · · Score: 1

    So you use a British Comedy to illustrate the fact that French are racists?

    You may not be racist, but you are stupid for sure.

    No, (s)he pointed out that many people had the same experience as portrayed in the comedy.

    Pay attention, Bond!

    --
    Note to ACs: I won't mod you up, even if you are being funny or insightful. So take a chance! It's not real life!
  61. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is a solution that didn't quite make it out of beta, but seems to be the answer.
    Let's give France back to Germany and apologize for the Normandy Beach misunderstanding.

  62. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Où sont mes points de modération quand j'en ai besoin ?"

    J'ai pensé exactement la même chose. Ils sont fous, ces Ricains. Dans 5 minutes ils vont dire que les garçons à Paris ne sont pas le comble de la politesse.

  63. legal system by colfer · · Score: 1

    The fact that he blanked out their faces shows photography is a different matter legally than in the U.S. Hard to believe they are allowed to rip something off your head or even out of your hands though.

  64. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by dr2chase · · Score: 1

    Would this be true in Greensboro, North Carolina? No idea what the French law is, but "anywhere in the world" includes lots of places.

  65. Re:France has a problem by Pieroxy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They basically confined their Arabic minorities in ghettos for a generation

    As always, it's a heck of a lot more complex than that. No, we haven't confined our Arabic immigrants in ghettos. Yes, there are ghettos. No, they weren't designed to be ghettos. No, newly arrived immigrants DON'T want to live anywhere else than in those ghettos.

    I can too make uninformed and misleading catchy sentences. Look: Meanwhile, while we accept those immigrants in our land, they lapidate and kill christians all over northern Africa.

    See? Sounds good, is punchy, makes an impression, and is utterly stupid. Just like your statements.

  66. Re:France has a problem by Weezul · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, race is irrelevant here. These were McDonalds employees trying to protect their McDonalds from journalists. They should be put in prison, their McDonalds should be closed, and McDonalds should pay the guy a lot of money.

    It's true the Arabic neighborhoods are considered the most dangerous in Paris, but they aren't nearly as dangerous as an American or British city though.

    France has a reputation for "turning foreigners racist" because many North African / Arabic French harass women on the street rather nastily.

    This is really really obnoxious if you're either female or go out with women, but I've never seen a fight or stabbing in France. I feel more safe in a French ghetto than outside a bar in England or Boston.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  67. Re:Are you real? by vrt3 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the answer is yes.

    --
    This sig under construction. Please check back later.
  68. Re:something's not right here by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    That's pretty much what I wonder here, too. I'd be delighted to hear the other side of the story.

    Don't get me wrong, I have been following Steve Mann for a while and we dream the same dream (with the main difference that he can actually pull it off while I lack the money and time), but somehow this story doesn't add up. People are irrational, yes, and they are often lunatics, yes, but we're not talking random hooligans here who could at worst face an assault charge (which the average hooligan responds to with "pick a number and get in line"), we're talking about employees at the restaurant he's been to which would most certainly lead to instant firing if there was exactly zero reason for their behavior. On top of assault charges which would nearly as certainly lead to them being pretty much unemployable in a similar environment.

    What was Step 4?

    I somehow think that there is some parts missing in this story, and I'd love to hear a statement from McD what's their side.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  69. Well.. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    Assault is never good, but I can imagine the reaction, it will become a bigger problem, as people wearing 'camera's like and recording is an invasion of privacy.

    1. Re:Well.. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Is it any more an invasion of privacy than other people being able to see and hear is? What difference should information being stored on a computer vs existing in somebody's brain make, insomuch as it is a privacy violation?

    2. Re:Well.. by SuperDre · · Score: 1

      A still cannot put a copy of the images/video in my brain on the internet.

    3. Re:Well.. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      .... Yet.

  70. Re:France has a problem by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    No, (s)he pointed out that many people had the same experience as portrayed in the comedy.

    Pay attention, Bond!

    So the comedy was an illustration or not? You say I got it wrong, but the bottom line is that you agree with me...

    I never said he used the Comedy to deduce of imply anything, just as an illustration.

  71. Re:Are you real? by rve · · Score: 2

    That area in Munich is only unsafe if you're afraid of Turks, it's not the kind of anarchy you describe. Are you claiming that these are areas where in your words "cops cannot do much, because they are outnumbered (and outgunned !) by the residents" ?

  72. This will be the next cell phone faux outrage by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Wait and see they'll be endless screeds and hate speech about 'people using those damn things everywhere'. They'll be new laws preventing people from wearing them while driving. People getting banned from restaurants and movie theaters and endless endless articles about how Mother Government must crush them all under her boot heel forever.

  73. Re:France has a problem by daem0n1x · · Score: 3, Informative

    These guys were ALL seemingly of middle-eastern origins but that's NOT the issue.

    If they were Arabs, the most likely origin is Morocco, Tunisia and specially Algeria. These countries are in the Middle East just as much as France is.

    Otherwise you're right, that's REALLY NOT the issue.

  74. Re:France has a problem by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the record, 'French' is not a race...

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  75. McD? Looks like Pollos Hermanos to me by Suomi-Poika · · Score: 1

    Take a look at the perpetrator #1. He is not some run of the mill McD dude, he is Gustavo Fring! No wonder our nerd glasses dude got little bit roughed there.

  76. Re:France has a problem by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1, Troll

    France is AWESOME. Unless you have to deal with the French.

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  77. facebook gamed by mcdonalds by jjbarrows · · Score: 1

    I tried to post a link to the article on Facebook, but it refused, claiming it had been flagged as abusive, Wtf!

  78. Re:France has a problem by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

    They also used to be banned in Turkey. I guess that makes them racist too.

  79. Re:My god, you are worthless piece of shit by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

    Where did I say that he deserved to be assaulted? I questioned his decision making process, which is my prerogative as the person involved in the incident presented only one side/story/perspective to the public.

    Have you ever considered brushing up on your reading comprehension skillset?

  80. He was hoping the police would arrive by Provocateur · · Score: 2

    Since he got assault, he needed pepper (spray) as well.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  81. are you really surprised? by cornfeed · · Score: 1

    All the comments seem to be focusing on whether this is even real. Am I the only one that expected this? When I read the first slashdot article talking about google glasses, that was my reaction. How could I circumvent all these wienies with cameras on their heads?! I see these types of troubles increasing as more people take these things out in public. I swear to never interact with anyone wearing those. If I have customers that walk into my store wearing those, they will be asked to leave immediately or the police will be called!

  82. Complete and total Bull shit by pablo_max · · Score: 4, Informative

    " They basically confined their Arabic minorities in ghettos for a generation, which prevented those minorities from acquiring French culture"

    Bull shit.
    They confine THEMSELVES! It is exactly the same here in Germany. The Muslim popular stays in their own areas. They choose not to integrate. The parents forbid their children from pursuing relations with non Muslims.
    You cannot blame the local population when immigrants refuse to integrate. We all know how understand Americans are about this sort of thing. They love it when Mexicans speak spanish to them. They would never say something like, "learn English you Mexican".

    1. Re:Complete and total Bull shit by slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They confine THEMSELVES! It is exactly the same here in Germany. The Muslim popular stays in their own areas. They choose not to integrate.

      I spent a few weeks working in Japan. I picked up a newsletter for British expats, which included an article about where to get the best British-style roast dinner in Tokyo. One weekend I went to visit a British friend who'd been living in Tokyo for a few years, and I mentioned that article to him. "I can't imagine why you'd come to Japan, where there's all this amazing Japanese food, and then go to these lengths to get a British meal, and spend time with British people"

      And he said "well, you know, after the first couple of months, you just want a taste of home, and to hang out with people who speak your language and understand your cultural reference points."

      And, put like that, I understood what he meant.

      Ghettos come about for (at least) two reasons:

        - People want to be near people who share their culture
        - People live where they can afford to live

      I do believe integration should be encouraged - but in a slow and steady manner. Making sure that schools all contain a natural ethnic mixture would be a good start.

    2. Re:Complete and total Bull shit by Inda · · Score: 1

      Self-segregation is nothing new. It happens in England too.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:Complete and total Bull shit by jittles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I do love when Mexicans speak Spanish to me. I love to practice my Spanish skills. In my experience, the immigrants HATE it when I speak Spanish to them. I have literally been excluded from conversations as someone explains directions to the one English speaker in the group, and I try to have a conversation with them. They act like it is racist for me to assume that they don't speak English, and try and converse in their native tongue. So after that experience, I have asked people politely if they mind talking to me in Spanish. I've had at least a dozen of them say no, and try to talk to me in English. While I admire their desire to practice English, in those cases, it is quite sad that no matter what you do, they seem to take it the wrong way.

    4. Re:Complete and total Bull shit by PPalmgren · · Score: 1

      The difference is that we don't have a xenophobic culture. France is notorious for this (well Paris mostly) and its blatently obvious to any foreign visitor. Yes, there are subcultures in the US living in distinct areas. Unlike France, there isn't rampant racism resulting from the holier than thou attitude taken by the locals. Aside from the alarmist news story, people tend to get along pretty well across cultural divides.

    5. Re:Complete and total Bull shit by wrook · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have mentioned this before, but not only is it easy to fall into a cultural ghetto, it's hard to get out. I'm also an expat in Japan. I used to hang out with other expats, but then slowly drifted over to hanging out with Japanese people. The expat community is kind of difficult sometimes because people come and go all the time. As my Japanese got better, I naturally spent more and more time with people who were going to be there for the long haul. Several people were angry with me and accused me of being a "Japan-o-phile" (wtf?) or of being someone I'm not (presumably Japanese...) When I finally got married to a Japanese woman, several of my expat "friends" dropped me for good.

      It's sounds bizarre saying it so plainly because when you live through it it's not really obvious what's going on. But communities like this are often quite hostile to the native population and get really upset if you don't agree with their stance. If you "go native", it's like you are betraying your own kind. It's completely insane, but it exists and you have to deal with it. Eventually I just walked out. I don't hang out with a single non-Japanese person on a regular basis any more. Not everybody is able to do that, and so the ghetto grows.

    6. Re:Complete and total Bull shit by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      That's not really how it is. I'm from an area with a large Mexican immigrant population (documented and otherwise) as well as descendants of hispanics who were here before California belonged to the US. Migrant workers stick to themselves precisely because they are migrant, poor people are in poor neighborhoods because that's where rent is cheapest, etc. Hispanics with moderate income are mixed in to neighborhoods matching their income level, richer hispanics are in large homes in neighborhoods with large homes.

    7. Re:Complete and total Bull shit by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There is a considerable difference between maintaining contacts with other people coming from your culture - while also meshing with other folk - and outright refusing any contacts with anyone who doesn't share your cultural background. Ghettos tend to form when the latter happens.

    8. Re:Complete and total Bull shit by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I found the opposite. I had a friend who was an immigrant from El Salvador. I was invited to his cousin's wedding in San Antonio, and the only people I knew there were him, his sister, mother and father. His cousin was marying a white person who knew no Spanish. Plenty of people thought I was with the grooms side, which was represented by about 5 people, and the other 50 were her side. When someone wanted to talk to me, they'd hunt down someone who spoke passable English and translate. I answered back in fluent Spanish with an identifiable Mexican accent (i.e., most definitely not a white-person who knows 10 words), and became the life of the party. I even managed some jokes in Spanish. Some tried practicing their English on me, and I just used whichever language seemed best for the particular conversation at the time.

      But also, part of that was the culture. I was there as part of the family, even if just a college roommate of one of the family.

      But my favorite was when I was in Spain and in a ForEx (cambio, exchange house/bank). The people in front of me were horrible Americans. They were loud, mean, and rude. They badmouthed the teller as they finished up, and I walked up and asked what the current rate was (usually posted, but they didn't have it posted), I asked in Spanish, but he answered in clear English. The jaws dropped on the two girls that just walked away. They realized that he understood everything they said, and he was messing with them a little because they were being bad.

  83. Re:something's not right here by psiclops · · Score: 1

    man who was satisfied and went away was not one of the perpetrators

    --
    i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
  84. Re:France has a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It wasn't so much that they were confined physically, as confined financially. To live in a good part of Paris you need at least a college or university education. Even then, you wouldn't be able to afford to buy an apartment, as everyone rents. The Arabic minorities didn't even get a college education, so that keeps them off the private property market. The only solution was to build apartment block housing in the suburbs of Paris. The other half of the problem is that you need contacts to get a good job. That's the second block. Some go to college and find they can't get an apprenticeship afterwards.

  85. Re:Are you real? by Altesse · · Score: 1

    Ok, how about this one :

    World's five most dangerous cities. In the top five, four are, in your words, 'the likes of Bogota', which I understand would be from emerging countries, and, guess what ? New Orleans. Are the USA an emerging country ?

  86. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Based on the pictures kindly provided in TFA, they were all boring-looking caucasians in generic 'knowledge worker' garb(complete with outward-facing photo-ID badge on belt in the case of the mental giant who decided to assault the guy with the camera attached to his head while wearing photo ID...)

    While I recognize the (statistically, perhaps, er, 'tentitatively validated') American reflex to assume that 'assaulted' and 'mcdonalds' in the same sentence signals a wacky story about the violence of the degenerate classes, it appears that the French golden arches crowd is slightly different...

  87. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not the end of the world, but you can see it from here.

    Only if you've augmented your vision

  88. Re:France has a problem by makomk · · Score: 1

    Well, obviously there's no law forcing them into ghettos - even France couldn't get away with quite such a blatent violation of US law. I have an odd feeling there are other, less codified ways in which they're excluded - probably home owners in white communities refusing to sell to Arabs, agents dissuading them from considering those houses and redirecting them to ones in the ghetto, that sort of thing.

  89. Ils sont avec les neiges d'antan. by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    Up or down, though, is a different matter. Because as far as I'm aware the French who don't baiser are either underage or incapable. The first sentence might be seen as insightful, but the second is a gross libel on most French people over 90.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  90. When a man bites a dog . . . that's news! by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 3, Funny

    assaulted by 3 employees of McDonalds

    This story would be definitely more interesting if the man assaulted 3 McDonald's employees with his Digital Eye Glasses.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:When a man bites a dog . . . that's news! by Haxagon · · Score: 1

      I think he's got a petawatt laser planned for the next iteration.

  91. Re:something's not right here by psiclops · · Score: 1

    1) He thinks that "a letter from my doctor" is some sort of do-anything-you-want card in private establishments across the world.

    no he doesn't. where does he say that anywhere.
    i would hope a letter from my doctor might help some crazed nutjob understand he is being completely irrational and does not need to assualt me just because i've decided to do something meaningful with my life and actually pursue the betterment of man........you know the note explaining what i'm wearing might actually come in handy.

    . Hey, look, I have a letter here which looks like it's signed by a doctor, I can come into your establishment wearing whatever I want!

    note or no note i wouldn't kick you out for wearing what you want. i'd likely kick you out for being a dick though.

    2) He thinks that the correct thing to do when you are "assaulted" is to write a report for the Internet and to supply random pictures, calling lots of people "perpetrators";

    no he thinks the correct thing to do is contact the relevant authorities (police and the store) which is exactly what he did.

    3) He says that these "perpetrators" caused the pictures because his system automatically takes pictures when it is knocked to the floor. Unless you're a lawyer, buddy, don't try to lawyer an argument;

    rationally explaining a situation in full != lawyering an argument.

    4) He claims that he "contacted the embassy, consulate, police, etc. without much luck". In what way did he lack "luck"?

    umm, in that they were of absolutely no assistance. it's kinda self explanatory. i would think you simply didn't understand the meaning of the phrase 'not having any luck' if it weren't for your next sentence.

    I've got several family members living in France and they've never suffered from lack of "luck" when reporting a physical assault.

    lucky them

    Maybe he doesn't know how to speak French and refused to accept a translator or find his own. Maybe he presented this weird page instead of stating that he had been attacked, answering the inevitable questions concerning what happened, and leaving the law to do its work.

    Maybe neither of these things are the case. in fact there's absolutely zero evidence that either of these things happened (in fact based on everything he's written in that blog-post i would doubt he cannot speak french, let alone refuse a translator)

    --
    i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
  92. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by Ash+Vince · · Score: 2

    Yeah? 'Pretty damn unique glasses' is a valid reason to discriminate at a
        public restaurant? Tell me, where did McDonald's post the nonuniqueness
        requirement for glasses on that building's entrance?

    Absolutely! All restaurants are private premises, and the owners/operators *always* reserve the right to ask *any* customer to leave for a variety of reasons. Nobody has a *right* to be served in any restaurant, likely anywhere in the world I'd say.

    Probably, it would be enough if the employees felt that he was causing a disturbance to the other customers, or was about to do so.

    Yup, but even if you are on private property they have to ask you politely to leave first. They are not allowed to lay a finger on you unless you refuse to do so or ignore them. Even then they are only allowed to use reasonable force to remove you from the premises, and that does not involve trying to take your property from you, especially if it happens to be attached to your head.

    --
    I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  93. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unfortunately they'd retaliate by giving America back to England and apologizing for the whole revolution misunderstanding.

    And believe me, nobody wants an English-inspired McDonalds.

  94. Re:My god, you are worthless piece of shit by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

    Why would you question his decision making process? He's with his kids. His kids are hungry. They want food ASAP or they won't stop nagging. The staff initially seemed to accept the letter. You must be thick to think there's something wrong with his decision making progress. Get kids and get a clue, then return to the discussion.

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  95. umm by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Is his right eye damaged somehow? If not, then how is the doctor's note supposed to explain his use of the device?

  96. Re:France has a problem by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do people say "minorities" instead of "non-white" or "darker-skinned people"? In some areas, these people are not "minorities" and yet are still referred to as such.

    I wish people would get over politics and political correctness to get to the real meaning. How many times will "mentally retarded" be redefined before people give up with the name changing? How many name changes for "negro" will we have to suffer before people just let the thing being labeled define itself? (What I mean about mentally retarded is that we don't "say that" now... it's special, challenged and even gifted. Their classes were "special education" and "life skills" and all that. And about negro? "Nigger" is more of a reflection on the lack of education of the user than the people labelled. But "colored people"? As in NAACP? Or the original negro as in UNCF (United Negro College Fund)? And "African-American"? Wholly crap! They aren't African! They are just American because they were born here *and* usually not %100 black!)

    Sorry... I just don't think it's enough to say "why can't we all just get along?"

  97. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

    No, you are blaming the victim. All the victim did was to visit the place, show the note from his doctor, and order food when they seemed to accept it. When the thugs came to assault him he once again showed his doctor's note, and then they proceeded to viciously attack him.

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  98. Re:France has a problem by bLanark · · Score: 1

    No, (s)he pointed out that many people had the same experience as portrayed in the comedy.

    So the comedy was an illustration or not? You say I got it wrong, but the bottom line is that you agree with me...

    I never said he used the Comedy to deduce of imply anything, just as an illustration.

    Err, yes, you got it wrong, IMO. I think that the reference to the comedy was not stupid. I don't think you can deduce from what I say whether I agree with you or not on the bigger issue, but you were wrong to say slim is "stupid" for making the post.

    --
    Note to ACs: I won't mod you up, even if you are being funny or insightful. So take a chance! It's not real life!
  99. Re:France has a problem by griffjon · · Score: 5, Funny

    The underlying question is why, for the love of all that is good in this world, would you eat at a McDonald's in France?

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  100. Elitist? What? by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1, Funny
    How is suggesting someone visiting a foreign country might actually find out what the locals do, elitist?

    Once, just once in my life, I ended up in a McDonalds in Frankfurt after my companion had rejected every possible variety of German, Turkish and Greek restaurant and cafe. It was, quite simply, a "starve in the gutter before I do that again" episode. I fail to understand how an educated man, a professor no less, could conceivably end up in an American fast food joint in a city where sticking a pin in the map will possibly still give you too many choices. It's like visiting Niagara Falls and spending the entire time watching the toilet flush.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Elitist? What? by DogPhilosopher · · Score: 2

      It's like visiting Niagara Falls and spending the entire time watching the toilet flush.

      So, watching the toilet flush is not good enough for Your Highness, huh?

    2. Re:Elitist? What? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I fail to understand how an educated man, a professor no less, could conceivably end up in an American fast food joint in a city where sticking a pin in the map will possibly still give you too many choices.

      Maybe his children said they didn't like the French food, and wanted something familiar. Maybe the children were tired, and then -- rather than spoil the evening -- it's best just to go along with it.

      Maybe he (or his wife) were tired after a full day sightseeing, and just wanted to do something simple (order from a known menu, in a familiar-ish place) rather than go through all the questions needed when visiting a restaurant in a foreign city (all the usual things that you can do automatically at home -- like know that that restaurant will be noisy and full of sports fans in half an hour, or that that one will be smoky, or won't like children, or won't have anything vegetarian -- have to be thought about).

      Or maybe they wanted to eat in 10 minutes and continue sightseeing.

      I was in Poland a couple of months ago. I was going out on Sunday night, and needed to eat something. The real Polish fast-food places had either already shut, or only opened later (to serve people after their night out). I ended up going to KFC, as it seemed to be the only place open. I think I was just in the wrong area (shopping area, rather than a tourist or nightlife area), but it made much more sense to go with KFC and continue with my night out, rather than spend at least half an hour walking around.

  101. What did people expect? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    "Hi, I'm a dude wearing several thousand dollars' worth of electronics on my body, see, everyone, see?"

    I don't know the circumstances of this assault, but I know that in the last several weeks I've heard about several construction sites broken into and robbed of as little as a couple hundred dollars' worth of copper. This morning was $20,000 in damage to the site, for $2000 in copper (new light rail construction vandalized).

    Personally, I think it would be very...trusting... to advertise to the public at-large that you have valuable electronics in your pockets. Particularly if you are distracted looking at online porn while you're standing there.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:What did people expect? by biodata · · Score: 1

      I don't think McDonalds employees usually assault their customers and try to steal their belongings. Unless you count supplying their 'food' as an assault, and taking money for it as a theft.

      --
      Korma: Good
  102. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by DemoLiter3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was his own mistake to take the Vision Enhancement as his first augmentation. Should have chosen Microfibral Muscle or at least Speed Enhancement first.

  103. Re:France has a problem by slim · · Score: 1

    It was racist even to bring race up.

    Here's a person who, upon hearing about a crime, thought "Oh, I know, I'd better post about what race they're likely to be."

  104. Re:France has a problem by cpghost · · Score: 1

    If you've spent some time in a Maghreb country like Morocco, you'll have noticed that most North African Arabs are just as light skinned as Lebanese, Syrians and Palestinians. Not to confuse them with the Berbers, who are more diverse (from very dark up to blonde with blue/green eyes).

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  105. Re:France has a problem by N1AK · · Score: 1

    No he used British people's response to a situation to illustrate that they perceive many French people are willing to admit openly to disliking arabs. How you expressed your nonsense point is even more dissapointing; but I suppose congratulations are in order, there's a dilbert about you

  106. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by the_fat_kid · · Score: 3, Funny

    wait, wait, wait.
    I have not read TFA.
    Are you telling me this is some sort of french geek on geek violence?
    It's kind of like when the Amish gangs cut off old Amish guys beards, sad, but what can be done?

    --
    -- Sig under construction...
  107. Re:Doctor's letter? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    It's probably so he can make it though security checks.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  108. Re:France has a problem by zero.kalvin · · Score: 1

    I should have made that distinction, thank you!

  109. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by slim · · Score: 1

    Bradford.

    In the 2001 census: 26.1% Asian -- the only places in Britain with a higher percentage of Asians are Leicester and Tower Hamlets.

    The same census says 69.3% white.

  110. Re:Are you real? by Altesse · · Score: 1

    Thanks a lot for clarifying my point. It's much clearer as you stated it (no sarcasm).

  111. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by Jesus_666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dude, we're nowhere near nanomods yet. He should've gone with CASIE or perhaps a skullgun. If he could kil just by thought, it would be beter.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  112. Re:Not really surprised by biodata · · Score: 1

    But it's not a real McDonalds it's just some franchise with the name over the door. Is this the normal experience for McDonalds customers? I've never been to one myself, but it doesn't make me want to try it.

    --
    Korma: Good
  113. Well by Jiro · · Score: 1

    While I can't say it's wrong to try to show someone assaulting you a letter from your doctor, it's a desperate move that may be the only choice available, but which you should expect probably won't work. Writing about it as if he expected it to work and that this criminal is especially bad for refusing to read it shows a lack of common sense. And a lack of common sense is likely to increase your chances of getting assaulted in the first place, if only because you don't avoid bad neighborhoods or take other common precautions.

    1. Re:Well by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

      While I can't say it's wrong to try to show someone assaulting you a letter from your doctor, it's a desperate move that may be the only choice available, but which you should expect probably won't work. Writing about it as if he expected it to work and that this criminal is especially bad for refusing to read it shows a lack of common sense. And a lack of common sense is likely to increase your chances of getting assaulted in the first place, if only because you don't avoid bad neighborhoods or take other common precautions.

      I know it's bad form to RTFA, but it appears that the "criminals" you mention were the management of the McDonalds in question. Also, the "bad neighborhood" was on the Champs Elysees smack dab in the middle of Paris (https://maps.google.com/maps?oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&q=140,+Avenue+Champs+Elysees,+Paris&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x47e66fea213f3677:0x130b82c34913be11,140+Avenue+des+Champs+%C3%89lys%C3%A9es,+75008+Paris,+France&gl=us&sa=X&ei=kZYFULL1DMfn0QG5g9jqCA&ved=0CAgQ8gEwAA)...

      Also, since our cyborg had already shown his note to other McDonald's employees and it was accepted and he was served food, it's not such a stretch to think that other McDonald's employees would react in the same way. But then, why let facts get in the way? Carry on.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  114. Re:France has a problem by todrules · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've actually started checking "African-American" on all surveys now, even though I'm "white," because we all came from Africa - everybody in the human race. So, technically, I'm an African-American, too. They never specify how far you're supposed to go back when they ask that question.

  115. Re:France has a problem by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the same reason you'd eat at a McDonald's elsewhere: You hate decent food.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  116. Re:France has a problem by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

    Don't get confused, I am not being racist

    I do not think that word means what you think it means.

  117. Re:France has a problem by jbssm · · Score: 1

    They basically confined their Arabic minorities in ghettos for a generation, which prevented those minorities from acquiring French culture and turned their native north african street-harasment-of-women culture into something really nasty.

    Sorry but I don't believe that explanation. In many places of Portugal, including the capital, we also have many different types of emigrants, mainly from the African colonies (Christians), but also a lot of Gypsies and Muslims. And guess what, most of them, except for the Gypsies, live right in the center of the city.

    Nobody is putting anyone away from society, at the most, the Gypsies keep away by themselves, although the government tried to pass laws to make their children go to school with the rest of the kids, but well... they don't want to. They also don't want to get a job because "it's against to their culture to receive orders" (No, I didn't say it, it was the head of the Gipsy Gulture Defense Association, that said it in a TV interview to try and justify the high unemployment rate and criminality related to them.

    The Muslims, although a more recent arrival, keep themselves away from the rest of society as well and follow their own laws... at least when it comes to the way they threat their woman and daughter.

    The only nice ones are the Chinese, they may not integrate much as well, but they follow the laws, their kids go to our public school with ours, and they are hard working.

  118. Re:My god, you are worthless piece of shit by acidfast7 · · Score: 1

    If he caves in to a nagging kid, that only reinforces the habit. That alone is a serious issue. I have two children you imbecile (5 and 2) and they've never eaten at McDonalds and I'd be quite surprised if they didn't travel MORE than the children in the original post (at least 6 weeks per year).

  119. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by whargoul · · Score: 1

    Oh there you are kettle!
    I've got a pot I'd like you to meet!

  120. Re:France has a problem by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 1

    In what way isn't 'French' a race?

  121. Wearable recording devices should be resisted by thereitis · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm not condoning physical violence, but I think wearable recording devices _should_ be resisted by the general public. I would have sided with the victim except for the fact that he has presented these (crystal clear) images that he saved onto the device. His defense is that the device is for improved vision, yet improved vision does not require images to be retained. Retaining images is the part I am against. Of course, with a wearable device like that nobody can tell whether you're "saving for later" or not, so an outright ban isn't out of the question.

    1. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by Theaetetus · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not condoning physical violence, but I think wearable recording devices _should_ be resisted by the general public. I would have sided with the victim except for the fact that he has presented these (crystal clear) images that he saved onto the device. His defense is that the device is for improved vision, yet improved vision does not require images to be retained. Retaining images is the part I am against.

      You could have bothered to read the article, you know:

      The computerized eyeglass processes imagery using Augmediated Reality, in order to help the wearer see better, and when the computer is damaged, e.g. by falling and hitting the ground (or by a physical assault), buffered pictures for processing remain in its memory, and are not overwritten with new ones by the then non-functioning computer vision system.

      As a result of Perpetrator 1's actions, therefore images that would not have otherwise been captured were captured. Therefore by damaging the Eye Glass, Perpetrator 1 photographed himself and others within McDonalds.

      You're correct in that a wearable device could be saving pictures without your knowledge, but the discussion is one of policy and based on a hypothetical that has not occurred: he did not intentionally save any images. Your particular outrage at the victim here is misplaced.

    2. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 1

      Wow, this and another perfectly reasonable response have been downvoted to -1. Way to go /., you jerk those knees and hate anyone who dare stop and think "hey, a device that normally continually overwrites what it records unless certain things happen might be useful, like if you got mugged or raped or car jacked, etc.."

      Nah, fuck that, it's a privacy invasion and fuck anyone who disagrees, downvote, downvote, downvote!

    3. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with saving images in a publicly frequented location? It isn't like he was sneaking into someone's house.

    4. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Maybe you forgot, but your eyes are directly connected to an incredibly powerful storage device.

    5. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by PhinMak · · Score: 1
      I am interested in hearing more about why you are against recording devices. Could you be specific about the negative unintended consequences of having this be more common? I truly am interested in hearing your concerns.

      I can think of a number of incidents in the past few months where I wish I had a video/audio recording of what was going on around me. 1) My father-in-law being hit by a car then the driver lying about what had occurred. 2) Me not remembering the list of groceries my wife asked me to get. 3) Going to a beer festival and not being to remember all of the great brews I had or exactly who had said they would like to pour at another festival I produce...

    6. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      It retains images in case of physical shock to the system. The memory otherwise serves as a buffer that is constantly overwritten and not kept, which is no different than the design of other black boxes and similar devices. It would not have saved any images at all if they had not tried to grab it from his head.

    7. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by Wattos · · Score: 1

      RTFA before you spread non-sense.

      From TFA:

      The computerized eyeglass processes imagery using Augmediated Reality, in order to help the wearer see better, and when the computer is damaged, e.g. by falling and hitting the ground (or by a physical assault), buffered pictures for processing remain in its memory, and are not overwritten with new ones by the then non-functioning computer vision system.

      It only recorded the images because the camera got damaged.

    8. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by thereitis · · Score: 1

      Cool - I missed that part. However, there is no guarantee that other devices will work the same way. However, all you need is one competing device maker to say "save *everything* you see with our model!" and others will be forced to follow suit. Not to mention, once word gets out, you'll have attackers force-removing the device from your head to take away your evidence whether it's screwed to your skull or not.

    9. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by thereitis · · Score: 1

      Do you (and several other commenters) really expect all implementations of wearable recording devices to behave the same? Wait till the devices hit a critical mass of users... permanent recording is inevitable.

    10. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by thereitis · · Score: 1

      You can do all the things you said using a cell phone camera. Sure, we record everything we see in our brain. But our brains aren't interconnected with everyone else on the planet. Look up "self policing society" and think about a world where everyone has a device that records everything around them. And yes, I now understand this particular device only saves images in certain circumstances, but thinking that future devices will not save everything is incredibly naive.

    11. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by PhinMak · · Score: 1

      I'm looking up "Self-Policing Society" and finding that most of the discussion revolves around citizens taking up roles we would normally assign to police or courts. (Lynch mobs being the obvious extreme case.) I am not finding anything specific to the negatives of having a recording available. Can you please be more specific about the negatives?

      Regarding "do all those things with a cell phone", sure I could have a cellphone recording all the time but how would that be any different with what this guy is doing with an eyepiece/glasses? I'd have to have it recording all the time to catch the rare instances when a car hits a pedestrian in front of me...

      Again, I'm trying to find out more about the negatives for having a recording available. I can think of a few issues such "big brother", "nanny state" and not wanting my recordings within my home to leak out into the public, but I also think that there is little expectation of privacy once you've left your house and I'd really like to be able to prove that "it wasn't my fault" in a car crash etc. We all know about eyewitnesses being unreliable etc etc.

      Not trying to dismiss you. What are you worried about?

    12. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Wow, i fervently pray you never achieve a position of power. You have NO RIGHT to tell me what i can and cannot record and retain in public. If you dont like it, DONT GO OUT INTO PUBLIC.

      --
      Good-bye
    13. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by Junta · · Score: 1

      Or one could be rightfully skeptical that the recording images are because it was bumped rather than he likely has a 'store recent video' capability.

      His explanation of the system seems suspect. He presents stills from at least a good 5-10 minute window. If all it was doing was augmented reality, then a 30 second old image has pretty much zero value and would not be retained by the system except to facilitate capture ability. Imagine yourself in the same position, with video footage naturally occuring. Would you not want to have video capture ability, just in case? Hell I know I would and i'd even have it uploading video content as quick as it can to some internet server in case anything happened to me that would leave any on-person storage not viable.

      While all this makes him a bit more disingenious, I'm going to say whether you video it or not makes little difference. We wouldn't kick someone out of a store for having an eidetic memory, recording the data isn't that different. If you let someone see with their eyes, then implicitly you trust them enough to record.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    14. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      And how would someone know this?

      Using their powers of literacy and conversation, they could read the written description he proffered while acknowledging what he's saying. It's amazing how far talking to someone will get you, as well as how much confusion it can help to clear up.

      Why would they believe some random person who tells them that the odd camera device they are wearing isn't being used as a recording?

      I don't know. Maybe some common decency to assume that someone is telling the truth? Or perhaps simply asking them to leave first, rather than trying to yank the device from the customer's head first, then talking to them afterwards? Again, talking works wonders.

      It makes no sense - why would you wear something like that if you weren't using it to record?

      For all of the things he actually uses it for, predominately augmented reality. The lens on the front doesn't record in typical practice. Instead, it's just a visual input. That image is then piped through to his eye, along with a virtual overlay on top of the image. Augmented reality is a fairly common thing these days, with everything from smartphones to Google glass getting in on the action. It may be less common than standard recording devices, but they are by no means uncommon, nor have I heard about a single place where they are explicitly forbidden.

    15. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by thereitis · · Score: 1

      We all know about eyewitnesses being unreliable

      Yes, because memory is a lossy medium and you need to decide whether you believe what the witness is saying. Obviously, having a recording of an accident can be extremely useful and I agree with that. However, that on its own is not a justification for wearable recording devices.

      Has anyone studied the psychological effects of being recorded 24x7? Looking inward, I think that would be a horrible way to live. Do I second-guess everything I say and do to make sure it is appropriate for a global audience, as opposed to just the people I can see around me? Maybe I want to goof off in my friend's back yard - I don't need everyone recording what I'm doing. Another point is that when I do something in public, I see who's around me and know that in general, only they are seeing what I am doing. Most people will think nothing of it - I'll just blend in the background and fade from memory. How can that continue to be true once whatever I do is in digital form? What are the social ramifications and has anyone done research on this?

      The "little expectation of privacy" statement is a little too convenient sounding for my liking. Just the social issues alone is worth more thought. Also, assuming that recording will only be done in public places is a bit presumptuous. Will people take their glasses off before coming into my yard to visit, deliver a parcel, etc..? Look at how movie stars live in the public eye everywhere they go, including their own property sometimes - I'd never want that. Anyway, I encourage you to do your own thinking.

    16. Re:Wearable recording devices should be resisted by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      So it managed to buffer how many seconds of data?! before it "broke" - Looks like it can convieniently break whenever he needs to recover video/images from it. Convienient that such breakage was enough to freeze the "buffer" in such a way it could be recovered.

      Nice explaination but I'm not buying it... with that said, so what if he is recording everything in public.

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  122. Re:France has a problem by solidraven · · Score: 1

    It is true that most of the prisons in Europe have a considerable non-European population (in fact here over half the prison population is foreign or of second generation foreign descent). A lot of it being made up out of (former) citizens of African or Middle-Eastern countries. Saying that will get you called a racist but it's simply a fact. The real question is what you do with that information. So yes it does mean that if a crime is committed that has a jail sentence attached to it is statistically far more likely that it's a person that came from one of those particular geographical areas. But you can draw this conclusion out further: they don't adapt well to local customs and do commit criminal activity, the police force is racist, etc. But this is getting rather off-topic I think. And it's a pointless argument anyway

    It's simply a fact that many shop keepers and restaurant employees in France aren't very nice people. I stopped visiting France not cause it's not a nice country, and most people are friendly indeed. It's just that all the people who should be happy to get tourists in their business treat them like they're a disease. Going to Germany or the UK is far more pleasant in that aspect.

    And McDonalds should very much apologise for this and repair the damage done to the device and in my opinion they should also refund part of the trip cause I doubt they had a pleasant stay afterwards.

  123. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Sentrion · · Score: 3, Funny

    All who like France, please raise your hand. If you are French, please raise both hands.

  124. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by slim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most British people understand "Asian" to mean Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi/thereabouts. We would normally refer to Chinese/Korean/Japanese/etc. as "Oriental". I appreciate that in the US "Oriental" isn't PC. That is not the case in Britain.

    I'm not sure whether the 26.1% covers both Indian and Chinese people - but realistically, the East Asian population would be a statistical blip compared to the Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi population.

    22.1% of the census population (included in that 26.1%) was "British Asian", suggesting that 4% were 1st generation immigrants.

  125. Re:France has a problem by MisterSquid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reason blacks in the United States and scholars of race are particular about naming is because historical usage is often inaccurate and/or racist.

    Negro is a mistaken identification of race, and scientists are in general agreement that race has no biological basis.

    In the contemporary context, "black" is perfectly acceptable as is "African-American", though "black" has problems with precision and specificity as does "African-American". For example, many "black" people are actually less black in their skin-tone than some non-blacks (including some whites). African-American confuses nationality and obscures color in order to be historically accurate and, for better or worse, is the term generally accepted by educated and cultured people in the United States.

    The real issue is that racism is often not even conscious. People don't even recognize how they have been subtly trained by media and culture to hold a racist bias.

    What I find curious is how you mush together a discussion of how to refer to mentally impaired people and people of black African ancestry. Why these two? Why not Jews and blacks, or Indians and blacks? What are your unconscious presumptions about these populations that makes you link them together when thinking about how to name them?

    --
    blog
  126. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by crazyjj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    only an American could be so racist.

    Colonial Africa would beg to differ.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
  127. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by somarilnos · · Score: 1

    If you think the golden arch crowd isn't rough in the states, you obviously haven't been to an inner-city McDonald's.

  128. Re:France has a problem by slim · · Score: 1

    In what way isn't 'French' a race?

    In the sense that two French people can have different races.

  129. I was born in one such "gettho" banlieu by aepervius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The things is, it was indeed a historical issue : those gettho as you call them were not really arab gettho. They were place (mostly bar buildings) with very low rent (HLM=habitation à loyer modéré=Housing with limited rent). Those became inhabited with a high proportion of north african and central african people, but there is a lot (and initally a majority) of non-african people in them. But due to the fact that most immigrant at least initally had low pay job, there was a concentration which happened. So it was NOT that arabic minority were confined intentionally, it just happened that they went to the lowest rent. Heck, my mother told me when those HLM were started , she went in with my father, arab was a minorities. When they moved onn 20 years later Arabic/central african were the majority in the particular building. But then again which gettho is initially intended ? probably not many.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  130. Re:France has a problem by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

    Because "French" is a nationality. The French people are a mix of races. The original Gallic peoples, some Romans, some Normans, some Germanic mix, and more recently, many people of Arabic or North African nomad descent.

    Saying that "French" is a race is like saying "Canadian" or "American" is a race.

    --
    Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
  131. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by sirlark · · Score: 1

    Be pure, be vigilant, behave!

    Actually, if the naturals want to win, shouldn't they misbehaving... a lot.. and winning by force of numbers

  132. Re:France has a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What kind of bullshit moderation is this? +1 Informative?

    Generally I'm a pretty liberal guy. But go to Europe sometime. The first time you encounter Arab immigrants you'll get some insight into what the OP meant. I was in Germany, and the Turks there made the pricks on Jersey Shore look like a bunch of polite, level-headed pacifists.

  133. Re:France has a problem by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

    In what way isn't 'French' a race?

    Most ways. In what way ís 'French' a race?

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  134. Camera stors images by coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find it a bit too convenient that the camera the guy is wearing only kept the images of all perps (even the attempt to hide the name tag), witnesses, etc., exclusively "as a result of Perpetrator 1's actions"? I call BS.

    The events he describes took place over at least 5 minutes and all the images were stored only because when "the computer is damaged, e.g. by falling and hitting the ground (or by a physical assault), buffered pictures for processing remain in its memory"? Complete and utter bullshit.

    I bet there is more story than what he is willing to say (e.g. there was probably at least a warning and a request to leave the premises before he was attacked).

    1. Re:Camera stors images by coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or the thing has a internal 15-30 min video "blackbox" just in case (which is what I'd do...).

  135. Re:A lot of oversights in that summary by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 1

    His choice of establishment to get food has no bearing on the events or himself. It does, however, have a decent bearing on how much of a pretentious douchebag you make yourself out to be by bringing it up. No worries though, there appear to be quite a few of you out there who want to pick on the guy for being at a McDonalds, as if that somehow legitimizes the assault or otherwise matters one whit in the events that happened (hint: they don't).

  136. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by grahamm · · Score: 1

    And in the 2001 census had various options, including 'Other Asian' under the Asian category but had Chinese as a separate (not under Asian) option.

  137. This is exactly why I switched to Jack-in-the-Box by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 2

    Their commercials are funnier too.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  138. Re:France has a problem by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

    Are you implying that some of us are descended from some other species of Homo Sapiens (if that's not an oxymoron) that didn't evolve in Africa?

    --
    No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
  139. Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by evilandi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whilst I don't doubt for a moment that Parisian fast food operatives can be rude and physically pushy, it does appear from TFA that he had communication issues and a tendency to be rather arrogant (the whole article starts with "DON'T YOU KNOW WHO I AM? I'M AN ACKNOWLEDGED GENIUS!" and works its way from there).

    McDonalds in France (and in the UK and many other countries) do not allow still cameras, video cameras or other recording equipment to be operated inside their restaurants without explicit permission from the managers.

    This is clearly labelled on all the doors as you go in, not just in words, but a picture of a camera crossed out.

    If you don't agree, go elsewhere, problem avoided.

    What seems to have happened is that an attention-seeking American ignored these notices. He was then asked to put away the recording equipment, and he didn't comply. At that point he was probably asked to leave, but from TFA I'm not convinced he knew enough French to realise what was being asked of him. A scuffle then broke out.

    It's important to note that on private premises, the staff can ask you to leave for any reason (it's their shop, not yours) and if you refuse, they can legally use reasonable force. Same anywhere in Europe. In larger cities where they have lots of troublemakers they will even employ professional bouncers (doormen, security guards) to enforce this, but anyone acting with the owner's consent can chuck you out, physically if need be. My first wife was even directly instructed by the police to physically manhandle unruly customers out of her amusement arcade rather than calling 999 (911/112), which seeing as she was a 6'2" amazonian and her customers were weedy videogaming teenagers was rather one-sided, and probably not the Xena experience they had fantasised about. Point is, shop staff can ask you to leave, they don't have to give you a reason, and if you don't comply, they can physically chuck you out perfectly legally.

    Now there's clearly a question about whether the amount of force used was reasonable, but that question only arose because he ignored or refused to comply with what is a very, very reasonable request: People in restaurants generally don't want to be filmed. If he's too ignorant or arrogant to deal with that, then scuffles such as the one he described are entirely predictable.

    As if to reinforce people's view of him as arrogant and out-of-touch, he appears to have looked up American contact information on WHOIS rather than using the phone number on a French-language website; seemingly he thinking a bunch of IT infrastructure engineers 8,000 miles away are going to be able to do anything about bouncers in a fast food restaurant in a foreign country.

    In short, the moral of the tale is: If you're in a foreign country and you're pissing people off, consider the possibility that the foreign country has different social norms than what you're used to, and adapt appropriately. If you're not prepared to accept that, rip up your passport and stay at home.

    I mean, heck, I'm not a fan of Catholicism, but I'm not rude or arrogant enough to expect to be able to visit French cathedrals wearing beach shorts without getting an old lady jabbing a sharp, painful and accusing finger into my hide, and even if I did, I'd take it as an indication that *I* was the one doing something wrong.

    People are trying to relax and eat, put your recording equipment away dude!

    (And I don't for a moment buy the argument that the digital glasses aren't recording equipment. Exhibit A, the still photos on the chap's web page.)

    The bloke was being a dick.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The glasses are meant to augment reality not record it. They only recorded images because they were damaged so the buffer could not clear data. You may not believe it, but checking buffers is a common computer forensic technique to retrieve data on damaged devices so you might want to learn a bit more before writing. For that matter, they did not take away peoples' cell phones, tablets, pda, or cameras, so why should he have to literally remove this item from his skull. In case you missed it, they were surgically attached to his body. That is why he has a doctor's note. Policy does not permit the illegal use of force in a public abode.

    2. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What seems to have happened is that an attention-seeking American ignored these notices. He was then asked to put away the recording equipment, and he didn't comply. At that point he was probably asked to leave, but from TFA I'm not convinced he knew enough French to realise what was being asked of him. A scuffle then broke out.

      He's Canadian.

      It's important to note that on private premises, the staff can ask you to leave for any reason (it's their shop, not yours) and if you refuse, they can legally use reasonable force. Same anywhere in Europe.

      Congratulations, in Germany you just commited abduction, assault and possibly robbery if you took anything from them(Freiheitsberaubung, Körperverletzung, Räuberischer Diebstahl).
      You are NOT allowed to use physical force to remove a unruly customer from your premises. You can only ask them to leave. If they refuse to leave you call the cops (customer is commiting Hausfriedensbruch now). At this point you are allowed to physically detain them (i.e. prevent them from LEAVING) until police arrives.
      The rules are slightly different if they aren't inside your establishment yet.
      Now, if you witness them commiting a *crime* (violation of your TOS isn't a crime), but let's say assault... you call the cops. And again you're allowed to detain them using "reasonable force".

      Been working as a nightclub manager in .de for over 20 years.

    3. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by fiordhraoi · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you need to RTFA, and perhaps do some examination of your own thought process.
      1) The glasses are not a recording device. The only reason they maintained images was because they were damaged, and new images did not arrive to fill the buffer.
      2) Anyone who attempts to rip someone's "recording device" off their head only to find out that it is SCREWED INTO THEIR SKULL is an idiot if they don't realize after that fact that this is not the same situation as some guy with a digital camera. You could make the analogy that while pets are banned from many places, service animals are welcome.
      3) Destryoing someone's documentation about their medical device is spiteful and childish at best, and legally questionable at worst.
      4) One would not attempt to hide their identity while taking a perfectly legal action in accordance with company policy.
      5) Obviously, the gentleman was angry enough to want to go to the top of the food chain (no pun intended). So even if this McDonald's was in France, the corporate HQ is in the US. So yes, attempting to get the corporate information from a US/English Language page makes perfect sense, rather than going to a "french-language" website where he can perhaps try to talk to the manager of that particular store.

      He'd already been served his food - if the restaurant wanted him to leave, their best course of action would have been to wait a few minutes and let him finish up. It certainly would have caused less hassle and embarrassment to everyone.

    4. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Wattos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In short, the moral of the tale is:

      In short, the moral of the tale is that you are an idiot. Just because he was having a camera, does not mean he is recording anything. Next you will want to assault anyone talking on a smartphone. After all it also has camera and he might be just faking the conversation.

      (And I don't for a moment buy the argument that the digital glasses aren't recording equipment. Exhibit A, the still photos on the chap's web page.)

      RTFA. It clearly says that it only records the images when it detects being damaged.

      The computerized eyeglass processes imagery using Augmediated Reality, in order to help the wearer see better, and when the computer is damaged, e.g. by falling and hitting the ground (or by a physical assault), buffered pictures for processing remain in its memory, and are not overwritten with new ones by the then non-functioning computer vision system.

    5. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      One problem with your argument: they apparently started their "request" for him to leave by attempting to rip the device from his head. It wasn't until after that attempt failed that they took him aside, looked over his paperwork, ripped it up, and talked with him some more. Even in the situations you're describing, you need to ask the person to leave first.

      And since you read the article, you must know that the reason it kept the images at all was because it detected shock to its system. At that point, it started retaining images in its memory, rather than overwriting them as it typically does. So, while it does record, it only retains in instances of distress, which is what occurred here.

    6. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Mister+House · · Score: 2

      He's not an American you asshat; there may be plenty of things for one to rage about us Americans, but in this case you are the attention-seeking whore.

    7. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by wookaru · · Score: 2

      McDonalds in France (and in the UK and many other countries) do not allow still cameras, video cameras or other recording equipment to be operated inside their restaurants without explicit permission from the managers.

      It is true that he brought a camera-type device in with him, but it was a Physician Sanctioned vision assistance system (and he even had appropriate documentation!). It is not like he brought a point-and-shoot in and started taking silly snapshots of people without their consent. This is a device that he needs to enable him to live a normal life.

      I bet that very same McDonalds does not allow pets in their establishment, but they would allow a Seeing Eye dog. In my mind, this should be cast in the same light.

    8. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Well, that might be the case, however if this incident is anything to go by, people in resaurants need to be filmed.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    9. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by ArcSecond · · Score: 1

      First, the guy is a Canadian, not an American.

      Second, as he CLEARLY STATES IN THE ARTICLE, his device does *not* record images by default. The only reason it recorded images is that when he was assaulted and his system was damaged, it stopped over-writing images in the buffer, which were then recovered later.

      Bloke was being who he is: a geeky techno pioneer with a focus on developing augmented sight for the seeing impaired.

      You, sir, are the dick.

      --

      I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.

    10. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Obvious bigot is obvious.

    11. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Zymophideth · · Score: 1

      The guy is Canadian, not an "attention-seeking American" as you put it. Is it because he was eating at McDonalds that made you jump to that conclusion?

    12. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      France will make mistake and bomb itself.

    13. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough ... I still saw a bunch of flash photography at the Sistine chapel.

      Permanently degrading and destroying a world heritage site because *you're special* /sigh.

      For what it's worth though, in response to the grandfather -- Mann is Canadian.

    14. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by khipu · · Score: 1

      I mean, heck, I'm not a fan of Catholicism, but I'm not rude or arrogant enough to expect to be able to visit French cathedrals wearing beach shorts without getting an old lady jabbing a sharp, painful and accusing finger into my hide, and even if I did, I'd take it as an indication that *I* was the one doing something wrong.

      Actually, she's probably just coming on to you. Less than 5% of French go to mass, and only 25% believe in God.

    15. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      It's important to note that on private premises, the staff can ask you to leave for any reason (it's their shop, not yours) and if you refuse, they can legally use reasonable force. Same anywhere in Europe.

      Any reason? Like sex, race or ... disability?

      You might want to take a look at European human rights legislation.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Given the number of TV programs where they covertly film people committing all manner of shenanigans, I'd suspect that "no photography" signs have very little legal standing.

      I don't know if it is the law, but it should be the case that if there are CCTV cameras on the premises anyone else should be allowed to film too in the interests of balance.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

      Steve Man is Canadian, not American.

    18. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Magada · · Score: 1

      Fuck you and fuck your sig and your dumb shit blog. That is all.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    19. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      It's important to note that on private premises, the staff can ask you to leave for any reason (it's their shop, not yours) and if you refuse, they can legally use reasonable force.

      No, although they may be allowed to use minimum force. Just because these people work for a junk food chain doesn't mean they can rip things off people's heads or deliberately damage their paperwork.

      There are some thugs who think because they are employed they can assult their boss's customers. These kinds of people don't stay employed long.

    20. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

      McDonalds in France (and in the UK and many other countries) do not allow still cameras, video cameras or other recording equipment to be operated inside their restaurants without explicit permission from the managers.

      This is clearly labelled on all the doors as you go in, not just in words, but a picture of a camera crossed out.

      If you don't agree, go elsewhere, problem avoided.

      Apparently not. If you happen to miss the sign at the door someone approaches you and seems to be ok with recording equipment. Then they take ur money in a legal contract of sale. Then they subsequently decide that it is now NOT OK to do what they already knew you were doing and throw you out the door while attempting to and actually destroying your physical property in the process. But all of this will happen AFTER they get your money.

      If your going to speculate on what happened outside the article content, then why dont you speculate that the staff would have taken the glasses and not returned them, or dropped them on the floor and stepped on them? Because those actions seem more plausible then your speculative defence based on the facts we are told in the article. Considering the fact that the staff did destroy the only thing they could get there hands on which was a written doctors note owned by Mr Mann.

      Mr Mann has done what he can to contact the parties responsible and adress this through police and consulate channels. When he was unable to get any satisfaction on this matter, he released a blog post. From the information available he has acted appropriately and done far less then he could to hold McDonalds responsible for his mistreatment. It is time for him to find a lawyer and get reimbused for his loses and then some.

      I would love to hear "the other side". By I suspect McDonalds will say nothing until this is brought to court

    21. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by phasmatid · · Score: 1

      but it was a Physician Sanctioned vision assistance system

      Why capitalize -- is "Physician Sanctioned" a brand name? There is no magic in those words that would overrule the restaurant owners right to ban cameras. And folks seem to miss the difference between recording and not recording. If a picture is written into the buffer, that is photography. The fact that most of his imagery was quickly overwritten is aside from the main fact.

    22. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by geofgibson · · Score: 1

      Wow. I'm actually surprised, even for /. to see a response like this. First, it is pointed out numerous times that the device is NOT a recorder. The only reason images were stuck in a frame buffer was due to the damage caused by the person who assaulted Mr. Mann. Further, this is a medical device, the visual equivelent of hearing aids. Are we seriously suggesting that people with vision impairment should remain impaired because of ignorance and prejudice? Should thugs at fast food joints be allowed to rip hearing aids out of people's ears because they "don't want to be recorded??" This is total idiocy. The Perp. #1 was provided documentation of the medical nature of the device. Further, even assuming the management has the right in France to use force to evict people from their establishment, how is the assault and damage to the device appropriate? Just stunning the ignorance of the McD staff and this other comment. I often think that cyborg vs. human warfare is merely the stuff of sic-fi and fantasy but this incident leads me to think that we are still far to close to apes jumping about the Monolith than I would prefer. Sad, sad, sad ...

    23. Re:Recording devices are banned in McDonalds by Flodis · · Score: 1

      Just because he was having a camera, does not mean he is recording anything. Next you will want to assault anyone talking on a smartphone. After all it also has camera and he might be just faking the conversation.

      If you're talking in a mobile phone, it doesn't look like you're recording, and people will probably give you the benefit of a doubt. If - on the other hand - you have a head-mounted camera, it looks like you may be recording all the time. (Which he also was, so the perpetrators' misgivings about being filmed were not only easier to understand, they were also correct.)

      RTFA. It clearly says that it only records the images when it detects being damaged.

      RTFA yourself. Images are being recorded all the time. The images published on the website were saved because they weren't overwritten. That's different from 'not being recorded'.

      To me it seems the Mann guy acted like a moron, but I wasn't there, and there's only one source for the story.

      One thing that bothers me about his story is the way he touts the 'paper written by his doctor'. The camera is obviously not mounted there for medical purposes, so in what way is it significant that the paper is written by a doctor? It seems Mann uses the doctor-title rather than the contents of the paper to try to trump us into believing it is significant.

      Of course, what bothers me most is how he walks around visiting and filming in various places where he shouldn't, just because he himself has designed the glasses so they can't be removed. That the camera is non-removable does not make it OK.

      It would be nice if someone could design an EMP generator, mount it in a non-removable fashion to their body, and then go visit this Mann chap, and dissuade any protests from him by touting a paper from a hockey goalie.

  140. Probably a LePen initiative ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... to eliminate all inferior beings who need prosthetic devices. Next up, an assault on those who use crutches. We'll clean up that genome, yet. And as for those foreign-born cripples ...

  141. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by asylumx · · Score: 1

    What is this, high school?

  142. Contact info for McDonald's France by OshMan · · Score: 1

    Here is the contact info from the McDonald's website for the French office. Perhaps they should hear about the bad press they are receiving from this incident.

    McDonald's France S.A.
    1 Rue Gustave Eiffel
    78045 Guayancourt Cedex
    France
    Phone* : 33-130-48-6000
    Fax* : 33-130-48-6300
    * U.S. customers, dial 011 + before an international number, except in Canada, dial 1 + number.

    1. Re:Contact info for McDonald's France by dopaz · · Score: 1

      McDonald's responded via twitter, if that counts as acknowledging the bad press:

      https://twitter.com/McDonaldsCorp/status/225074195590156290

  143. Sounds strange.... by nik_qc · · Score: 1

    I think there is something missing in this story. Personally, if I was wearing something that does not offend the people and I was asked by some McDonalds employee (not using any adjectives here :) ) to explain what I am wearing - I would just leave the place immediately. There are so many restaurants in Paris (!!!). Side note: going to McDonalds in Paris is very American ;)
    Unless the question was out of curiosity - otherwise it is not your business. If an employee is asking this question - he/she does not respect me as your customer. And I am not eating at the place where I am not shown at least minimum level of respect. Period.

  144. highly variable is right by Phoenix666 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I agree with the other person who replied to you: it must be highly variable. I speak passable French and Parisians have always been jerks to me. On the other hand people elsewhere in France are normal. If anyone else out there has had the same experience with Paris we have and needs a rec for a place where people are friendly, I vote for Turkey. Kindest. People. On. Earth.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:highly variable is right by deadweight · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People in the rest of France think Parisians are a-holes too ;) On vacation trying to read a bulletin about a dive trip, I say excusez-moi to the French speaking girl in the way. She turns at me quite angry WHAT DID YOU SAY TO ME WHAT ARE YOU SAYING. My friend says "Are you from Paris" and she about loses it YOU SPY ON ME HOW YOU KNOW I LIVE PARIS

    2. Re:highly variable is right by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "I vote for Turkey. Kindest. People. On. Earth."

      I can tell you've never been on Camfrog.

      We typically BAN TURKEY on all of our video chat servers. For good reason.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:highly variable is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree with the other person who replied to you: it must be highly variable. I speak passable French and Parisians have always been jerks to me. On the other hand people elsewhere in France are normal. If anyone else out there has had the same experience with Paris we have and needs a rec for a place where people are friendly, I vote for Turkey. Kindest. People. On. Earth.

      Ironically, not speaking French is actually a way to have people be more polite to you. The people who are going to hate you for being a foreigner are less likely to have learned English. The people who are mean are likely to complain about you behind your back in French which allows you to remain blissfully ignorant. You will easily remain oblivious to them and only pay attention to the few people who are friendly towards you. If you try to speak a lot of French, on the other hand, then you are more likely to have an interaction with someone who dislikes you.
       

    4. Re:highly variable is right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know about Turkey, but I, too, had a similar experience in Paris. I lived near the French border (in Germany) for over five years; I was in France every week. According to the folks I encountered in the country on a weekly basis, my French was quite decent.
       
      I took a group of visiting American friends to Paris, and we were in a bakery one morning. Not only did the two ladies working there patently ignore me when I (politely) asked for something, but they stood there and complained to each other about how I was butchering their language! All I could do was say "I understand what you are saying" (in French) before I herded my visitors out of the store.
       
      That was about fifteen years ago. I was just back in Paris last year; I didn't even try to speak French. Interestingly, I was treated quite well.
       
      In all of my other travels around Europe over the past fifteen years, whenever I have tried to speak the local language, no matter how badly, I have been received with warm smiles and friendly words... just not in Paris.
       
        Merde!

    5. Re:highly variable is right by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I vote for Turkey. Kindest. People. On. Earth.

      Tell that to the Kurds.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  145. Re:something's not right here by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I was wondering the same thing. We're given the impression that this all happened in silence, which it obviously didn't. Presumably the employees said something. Presumably this was in French. No idea how fluent the blogger was in French, whether the letter was written in English or French, and whether the McDonalds Employees spoke English.

    My speculation is that the employee was sent by the manager who felt that this unusual behaviour was a bit weird.. Was asked to ask about the headgear. He asked. Reported back. The manager wasn't satisfied, and felt he needed backup, and decided to confront the odd person.

    Here we have the mysterious step 4.

  146. Re:France has a problem by slim · · Score: 1

    Why do people say "minorities" instead of "non-white" or "darker-skinned people"? In some areas, these people are not "minorities" and yet are still referred to as such.

    In Europe, I believe there are no cities in which whites represent less than half of the population. The area with the largest proportion of non-whites in the UK is the London borough of Tower Hamlets which is ~56% white. Obviously if you draw small enough boundaries you can isolate areas with strong non-white majorities, but I don't see how that's helpful.

    In the US, it's different. Atlanta, GA, for example, is 61% "Black or African American". It would be technically wrong to describe a black person living in Atlanta as a minority. But then I'm not sure anyone does - do they?

    The term "minority" is useful, because being in the minority puts you in a position of weakness.

  147. Restricted Items.. by thanosv · · Score: 1

    That branch is well know for peddling. Their employees make next to nothing and so like to augment their income... ...just like in casino's and certain street corners photography is not welcome.

  148. Why didn't he take this to the police? by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why he didn't take this to the police.

    It was assault on him, he has pictures, witnesses. Looks bad on France when tourist are getting attack.

    But I don't know, I'm not stupid enough to go to France.

    Unless of course, the people that attacked him were cops, and they just react like American cops when being filmed.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:Why didn't he take this to the police? by Yosho · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why he didn't take this to the police.

      He says in the article that he went to the police and they didn't do anything.

      Unless of course, the people that attacked him were cops

      But you didn't read the article, because one of the first things he said is that it was the employees at McDonald's that assaulted him.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  149. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perpetrator 1, what you can see around the white square, is so obviously not white it's painful. While I recognize the liberal reflex to assume that everyone who refers to the color of the skin of a perpetrator is lying, but that doesn't absolve you of not even bothering to look at the photos.

  150. Heh by X.25 · · Score: 1

    had an incident at a McDonald's in Paris, France.

    He was assaulted by three men during his visit to get food with his family.

    Huge hole in the story.

    You can't get food in McDonald's :)

  151. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    they were all boring-looking caucasians in generic 'knowledge worker' garb

    American reflex to assume that 'assaulted' and 'mcdonalds' in the same sentence signals a wacky story about the violence of the degenerate classes, it appears that the French golden arches crowd is slightly different

    Someone who so readily assumes that a white collar worker is less "degenerate" than a blue collar worker is quite a degenerate himself. Suits are the colors worn by the most dangerous gang in the world.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  152. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by mikael_j · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a European I'm going to have to show a bit of prejudice here and say that you really shouldn't encourage the Germans. It's still a running joke around here that any day now all those German tourists that show up every summer are going to pull out machine guns and start annexing stuff again.

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  153. Re:Are you real? by tlambert · · Score: 1

    That's an interesting statistic. You know that France has a higher suicide rate than all of those place, with the possible exception of Somalia, which we can make up things about because we lack the data for either one of those stats there:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

  154. Re:France has a problem by evenmoreconfused · · Score: 1

    ... scientists are in general agreement that race has no biological basis.

    Poppycock!

    If race isn't a biological manifestation, then what could it possibly be? Environmental? Chance? Of course there's a genetic difference between various groups of people who share certain distinctive features (e.g. skin colour, nose shapes, eye shapes, lactose intolerance). That doesn't mean that any of the groups are any better than another, that particular individuals always conform to their parent's genotype, or that these genes don't get endlessly mixed and remixed as time goes on.

    It seems to me that "race" is just the informal word* we use to talk about these different groups. It's certainly a concept that has started a lot of wars throughout history, and perhaps for that reason it's becoming increasingly politically incorrect to use. But the word does mean something, and that meaning is inextricably entwined with biology.

    ------

    * Perhaps we use "race" for human beings because we would be offended if we used the same term that we use for other animals: breed. But that would definitely be politically incorrect!

    --
    No. Well...maybe. Actually, yes. It really just depends.
  155. Re:France has a problem by slim · · Score: 1

    I think the scientific consensus is that all women have DNA passed down from a Mitochondrial Eve who lived in Africa.

  156. Re:France has a problem by slim · · Score: 1

    Of course he is.

    He saw an article about a crime in Paris. Of all the things he could have posted in response, the first thing that came to his head was "hey, nobody's speculated about the criminal's race yet! I'd better post with my guess."

    That is the action of a racist.

  157. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by jdmuskrat · · Score: 1

    yeah, and in Africa, Asia, Mid East, and South America there is no hate or violence or murder or etc. Only white people do that kind of thing. Now ethnic cleansing is necessary for all non white populations and is not at all violent or hateful.

  158. Re:Not really surprised by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Most McDonald's locations are franchises. Even here in the US. They buy their supplies from McDonald's and buy the rights to use the name. They can threaten to revoke their franchise license. Not much you can do with a building built as a McDonald's without a franchise license - except spend a lot of money to make it into a different restaurant. It would be cheaper to address the victim.

  159. Re:France has a problem by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    The underlying question is why, for the love of all that is good in this world, would you eat at a McDonald's in France?

    Unlike elsewhere, you know that a Big Mac won't contain snail, horse, or frog.~

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  160. Re:France has a problem by slim · · Score: 1

    Maybe he's Mormon and believes we're all descended from Adam and Eve, who lived in Jackson County Missouri

  161. Re:France has a problem by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    I have proposed, on many occasions, a new framework for identifying people by physical attributes, while remaining utterly politically correct. Here it is, for your enjoyment:

    "All people are people. Therefore, all people shall be referred to by their name, or as 'person'."

    "Who put these reports on my desk?"
    "A person."

    And nobody was ever offended.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  162. Re:France has a problem by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    Well, obviously there's no law forcing them into ghettos - even France couldn't get away with quite such a blatent violation of US law.

    Are you implying that France has any obligation in regards to US law? I genuinely don't understand your point.

    I have an odd feeling there are other, less codified ways in which they're excluded - probably home owners in white communities refusing to sell to Arabs, agents dissuading them from considering those houses and redirecting them to ones in the ghetto, that sort of thing.

    We've been meddling with the Arabic world for far longer than the US, and their feeling about France is at best ambiguous. We've fucked with Algeria pretty badly actually. We've tried to make amends by opening our country wide to a huge flow of immigrants and we've been giving them a lot of incentive to come abroad, financial and with a lot of "rights" that if they're not written are at least well understood. We've also made a lot of promises about the integration of immigrants.

    As a result, they come abroad full of expectations, which aren't met in real life. This creates a problem in and of itself. First off, they (a majority of them at least) come with the false expectation that they won't have to work their butt off to have a nice way of living. In return we offer them the RMI (Minimum revenue of integration). So yes, they don't have to work to earn a basic income, but no, this basic income is not enough to afford a nice way of living. And of course, the rest of the French population doesn't feel it's right to offer these people free healthcare, free transportation, an income for basically no return from their part. Not mentioning that they can make anyone from their family come abroad for free healthcare. Of course it's not legal but it's a well known fact. As a result, they are de facto excluded from other communities where people work their butt off to make a living. You can imagine the result after 30+ years of such policy.

    This has nothing to do with their race or religion. The fact that most of these immigrants are in fact arabs doesn't help either to make a nice image for them.

    All in all, it's a complex problem, and there is no simple solution. But the people that are excluded by the means you describe are excluded by their way of clothing and their way of speaking French in other words by their manners and education, not by the color of their skin or their accent. Not mentioning they are nowhere near rich enough to buy a house because earning money while doing nothing doesn't motivate them to actually try to work.

  163. Re:France has a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh right, those same French ghettos where there was recently a spate of rioting and setting cars on fire on the sides of the street for months on end? Sounds lovely. You only feel safer in a French ghetto than you do in Boston because of your own psychological biases, not because of the facts.

  164. Re:France has a problem by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

    The underlying question is why, for the love of all that is good in this world, would you eat at a McDonald's in France?

    There are a number of reasons, but the most likely one in this case is his kids wanted to eat at McDonalds. The parents then decided fine, it's a known food item that the spawn like and we can treat them.

  165. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > In a McDonald's in Paris

    Actually they were beating him up because he ordered a diet Coke instead of the nouveau beaujolais.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  166. Reminds me of M. T. Anderson's book Feed by Causemos · · Score: 1

    Get nearly everyone to wear them and connect them live to the net. Then when anyone does anything "wrong", it will be captured by everyone around them and immediately routed to the authorities.

  167. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by alva_edison · · Score: 1

    There are a large amount of Caucasian people in South America.

    --
    He effected a bored affect.
  168. Re:France has a problem by buglista · · Score: 1

    Sure, you could instead have essentially an uncooked McDonalds beefburger with a raw egg on. Much yummier!

  169. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    No, your justifications for violence cite defense. Initiated violence, (should you need the clarification) solves nothing. Walk softly and carry a big stick? Sure. Violence in defense is no crime, no immorality. But violence with arson? A boor's choice, and the stuff of cowards.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  170. Re:France has a problem by locketine · · Score: 1

    McDonald's actually changes their menu based on the local cuisine. I had a huge craving for a McMuffin while in Italy and they didn't have any. In fact their breakfast menu consisted of coffee, croissants and some strange items like fried olives and pickles.

    --
    Think globally but act within local variable scope.
  171. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    "knowledge worker" != geek

    That would be more like "corporate drone", which just couldn't compute when he saw the outfitted professor.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  172. extension of Street View paranoia by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Much of Europe went ballistic over Google's Street View. They are suing Google over privacy invasion and made a big thing of it the press. Perhaps any strange camera devices triggers angers people now.

  173. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or just stay out of Europe. In case you've not seen the news lately, the EU is turning into a pretty violent place with citizens attacking police & vice versa.

    Funny how the last McDonalds story led to many posts about "dumb Americans" and "typical American behavior". But when the Europeans act stupid suddenly there is silence.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  174. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by Apuleius · · Score: 1

    If you want to evict a customer, you say "sir, we will not serve you. Now leave."
    You do not assault him.

  175. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Q: Why are German soldiers not allowed to wear uniforms in France?
    A: So the French won't accidentally surrender.

  176. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1

    Colonial Africa would beg to differ.

    I know exactly what you mean. While living in Japan, I met a man from Tanzania who said of the Japanese, "These people are crazy! They don't even speak English!"

    --
    Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
  177. Re:France has a problem by locketine · · Score: 1

    Yeah... read some hostel reviews in just the shady parts of Paris (not the ghettos) and you'll see stories of muggings, pick-pocketing and stalking. I also took a hike to Sacré-Cur and felt unsafe passing through a very well maintained park where a bunch of black people were doing drugs in the middle of the day; I do have a natural tendency to distrust black people though due to being from Oregon where black people basically don't exist. I also saw a guy a vandalize a car using an ice-pick just a few blocks from my hotel in a good part of town. I managed to have both of these experiences while being there for just four days.

    --
    Think globally but act within local variable scope.
  178. Re:France has a problem by slim · · Score: 1

    Sorry but I don't believe that explanation. In many places of Portugal, including the capital, we also have many different types of emigrants, mainly from the African colonies (Christians), but also a lot of Gypsies and Muslims. And guess what, most of them, except for the Gypsies, live right in the center of the city.

    (Aside: I know English is probably not your first language -- an emigrant is someone leaving; an immigrant is someone who's come in. One country's immigrant is someone else's emigrant)

    Paris is not Portugal. From what I understand, in Paris due to their planning decisions, the centre is full of expensive property that only rich residents and high-end businesses can afford. Those homes and businesses need low-paying labour though -- cooks, cleaners, security guards etc. -- and those people have to live somewhere. So there is a ring of deprived areas a certain distance from the centre. They become ghettos because the only people prepared to live there are the ones who can't afford to live anywhere else, within reach of jobs.

    Other cities avoid this by planning affordable housing.

  179. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by hendridm · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing you're not from the U.S. (or France, apparently), but people are pretty ruthless here if you're "different." Homosexuals are regularly committing suicide for being tormented. We also have 4chan.

    My mother works at a nursing home where some of the "adult" staff make fun of and harass the mentally challenge volunteers. My mother tells them to basically fuck off and grow up, and they just laugh at her because they think it's funny.

    I'm not sure why we're so insecure. We pretty much do whatever the fuck we want.

  180. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by mrmagos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would they need machine guns? The power of their economy and stranglehold on the Euro seems to be doing the trick this time around.

    --
    Never start vast projects with half-vast ideas.
  181. Re:France has a problem by Captain+Spam · · Score: 1

    The underlying question is why, for the love of all that is good in this world, would you eat at a McDonald's in France?

    Because you're getting tired of Quarter Pounders With Cheese and you wanted to experience the Royale With Cheese that Jules and Vincent were talking about?

    --
    Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  182. Re:France has a problem by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Well, it's a population of people with a distinct geographic ancestry (France), ethnicity (French culture and language) and social status (French nationals presumably have citizenship, right?). I think that's "most ways" already covered - now, why do you think they should be disqualified? I'm not trying to be snarky - it's just that your answer hasn't clarified anything and I really would like to understand what you mean.

  183. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is a solution that didn't quite make it out of beta, but seems to be the answer.
    Let's give France back to Germany and apologize for the Normandy Beach misunderstanding.

    Fine, but first the French will have to take back Lousiana and of course turn back the rest of the US to the british.

  184. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    This is how it starts. The first blows in the war between Augmented Humans and the Naturals

    Puny human, BWAHAHAHAHA! You will be assimilated. You will not resist, you will beg to become a cyborg like us. Just wait until you need a pacemaker or a cochlear implant or an artificial hip or other body part.

  185. But what did they SAY? by AlejoHausner · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Steve Mann record audio too? The way his page explains it, it feels like strange mute men assaulted him and tried to forcibly remove his glasses. Surely those men weren't mute. They must have said something. Of course, they were speaking French, but Mann's daughter understands French. It would be nice to get her point of view, so we could get a better grasp on what happened. There's something missing here. It's like a silent movie.

  186. permanently attached? by multi+io · · Score: 1

    'The eyeglass is permanently attached and does not come off my skull without special tools.'

    What the... I mean how does that work? Has it been implanted into his skull bone? I hope he isn't a Borg drone.

  187. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Is that a quote from Starship Troopers?

  188. Re:This is exactly why I switched to Jack-in-the-B by The+Mister+Purple · · Score: 1

    I second that.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Feynman
  189. Re:France has a problem by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 1

    Not poppycock, but a matter of semantics.

    The point that people who say this are making is that "black people" aren't particularly similar to each other genetically, or in terms of any other biological characteristic except skin colour. Same with white people or brown people.

    Having said that, I'm not opposed to using skin colour to differentiate people. It would be pretty stupid, if I want to point out the only white guy in a group of black guys, to try to avoid referencing skin colour (nobody is going to say "the tall guy on the left with the red shirt" when "the white guy" will suffice). But don't pretend that skin colour makes you more of a "race" or "breed" than hair colour, height, etc.

    --
    It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
  190. Re:Paris McD manager = probably Euro millionaire by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    Being a millionaire does not give you the right to assault people.

  191. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Violence is the last resort of the incompetent. They are incompetent because they waited too long to go to violence. By the time it's the last resort it is almost certainly too late for it to do any good. The competent go to violence much sooner.

    L. Long. Paraphrased.

    Do I need to post the list of things violence has solved?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  192. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by geminidomino · · Score: 2

    I didn't ask for this!

  193. Clearly a cultural misunderstanding. by EdgePenguin · · Score: 1

    Violently assaulting someone is the French equivalent of the waiter coming over and asking 'is everything alright with your meal?'. It very slightly more irritating too.

  194. Re:France has a problem by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Another one. I have not mentioned race at all. You don't even know what race I am. White Muslims are Just as Capable and likely to be terrorists as brown ones, and there are plenty of brown victims, the peaceful Coptic Christians for example

  195. Unmask! by avm · · Score: 1

    I don't know the laws in France, but I doubt that a Canadian citizen is subject to them, if not in France.

    He should unmask the people on his blog who he's labeled Perpetrators 1-3. Why would you give them the courtesy of anonymity?

    Also, seeing as McDonalds originated in the US, I'd be filing any complaints with corporate HQ in Oak Brook, IL. I'm pretty sure corporate HQ can exert pressure on affiliates/franchisees outside the US.

  196. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    Do any damn thing you want.

    Aggression is the last resort of the thwarted. You'll think yourself to be proud to cite how uncivilized people can be. How it's somehow the wiser choice. How moral it was. "The right thing to do". And in each case, I can tell you that barring defense, it was the wrong thing to do. And we'll argue, but in the end, it's a line that you believe can be crossed, and that I argue must not be.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  197. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by volkerdi · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's not legal to videotape/shoot photos inside of a McDonalds and the employees overreacted to this ... that's my point ... and you missed it ... completely.

    I don't know about the law in France, but in the United States it is perfectly legal to photograph in any public place. That said, most citizens and law enforcement are ignorant of this fact, and people are routinely hassled for photography. Sometimes their photos are forcibly erased (which actually _is_ against the law). Places might have a "no photography" policy, and if they tell you to leave and you don't, then you are trespassing, but that is usually their only remedy under the law.

    Besides, under normal circumstances this device does not save any information, and is not "videotaping" or "shooting photos". It's a bit like assaulting someone at a concert for wearing a hearing aid.

  198. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Nursing home orderlys are barely above mentally challenged themselves. It is a shit job that nobody wants.

    For real bullying (bullying doesn't cover it) look at what the high functioning 'mentally challenged' do to the low functioning. An associate that used to be a psych nurse referred to them as the 'mongoloid mafia'. Rape is routine on these wards.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  199. Re:France has a problem by gorzek · · Score: 1

    The problem is that "race" was typically associated with skin color, and even now that idea tends to persist.

    If we really must categorize people based on their genetic origins, let's use haplogroups or something.

  200. Re:Paris McD manager = probably Euro millionaire by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    I was speaking in generalities; I'd hardly comment on racial crime stats for a sample size of 3!

    Also, working in a McD's is not the same as owning one... At least in Canadian franchises, the manager and the owner are completely different people. While the manager is an adult, it's not unknown for them to be barely older than the teens manning the cash registers.

    And *I* wouldn't look down on either of them based on their country of origin or the wage they earn.

  201. Re:France has a problem by Vlaix · · Score: 1

    The major admixture to the French ethnicity is actually way older the Gallic element (a civilization that came from the Alps), although everyone seems to forget it for the reason that Gauls were our first ancestors recorded by writings.

  202. Re:France has a problem by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    It is my understanding that most French people are nothing like the stereotype, they are decent hard working people.

    Parisians on the other hand, are the stereotype. Festering assholes!

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  203. At least he was not in Florida by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    He might scare somebody who feeling they were defending themselves pull out their gun and shoot themselves a borg.

  204. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    The first battle between augmented and not?

    Bzzzzt! Sorry, thanks for playing.

    The first battle between an augmented human and not was when someone picked up a branch to augment the human's clownish teeth and nails. I believe 2001 has one artist's conceptualization.

    Kzinti: What are those flat teeth for?

    Human: Chewing bugs and nuts and leaves.

    Kzinti: What are those claws for? If you can call them that.

    Human: They are scoops for digging up bugs to eat.

    Kzinti: You suck!

    Human: Feeling jumpy, froggy? Jump. We are good at augmentation.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  205. Re:France has a problem by berashith · · Score: 1

    This depends again on how you define the borders of the region. The proper city of Atlanta is a very small area, and it is predominantly black, although there are a lot of whites moving back. If you meet someone on a plane who doesnt feel like diving into the local specifics of their address, they may tell you that they are from Atlanta, when they are from a part of the 14 ( I think?) counties that make up the metro-Atlanta area. There was significant white flight to these counties in teh 70s and 80s, at the same time that the city was growing very rapidly ... or I should say the metro area , as the city was shrinking in population. Until very recently the city was nearly dormant at night, as the people who worked there drove and hour or two back home every evening. This is now changing back to being a living city.

    The majority black citizenry of the city has allowed the expected control of local politics, and the response from all the white flighters has been to attempt to avoid allowing state funds into the city as much as possible. The isolated area of majority population still suffers from the same minority status issues this way, so my point on defining the borders of the city still stands.

  206. Re:France has a problem by Vlaix · · Score: 1

    Tourists are endured as a disease because they behave as such. Especially Americans (Chinese may prove annoying because of the size of their groups). I'm getting tired of seeing my land invaded six months a year by individuals always expecting you to speak THEIR language (which I do for most of the nations visiting us, although speaking the visitor's language is not an honour given lightly), taking photo shots as if you're a zoo animal and not carrying the least for anything except seeing their cravings for clichés fulfilled.

  207. Re:France has a problem by Teancum · · Score: 2

    I sometimes wonder how the politically correct would think of Elon Musk as African-American. Technically in terms of birth place in the same sense that you have Chinese-Americans and Mexican-Americans and other such nonsense, he really is African-American, just not so much in terms of skin color. In his case he was even born in Africa and a citizen of an African nation before becoming a naturalized American citizen.

    Skin color is just that, the amount of Melanin that is within the skin cells of the person being described and perhaps some other elements to their skin as well. While there are some other genetic traits that can be described jointly with the skin color, it is pretty shallow and doesn't really matter.

    Besides, there has been so much inter-breeding between peoples of the Earth that I dare anybody to say they are 100% of any ethnicity or 0% of some other ethnicity. If they think so, they have likely been lied to by their parents or simply are clueless about their ancestry. More likely simply clueless I might add. Heck, there are still descendents of the Neanderthals running around (likely whose genes have spread throughout the entire human gene pool), and that is a readily identified different species, much less a "race". Yeah, cue the jokes if you will, but it is true none the less.

  208. Re:France has a problem by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    The underlying question is why, for the love of all that is good in this world, would you eat at a McDonald's in France?

    Because you can?

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  209. Re:A lot of oversights in that summary by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the summary needs augmented reality glasses because it missed some things.

    ...Anyway, reading his account of it makes me want to hit him due to his unbearable writing style and attitude and I'm not even staring into his robo-glasses, getting photos randomly taken of me.

    Now son. Your mother and I keep telling you, "use your words." Apparently, you're not the only one who hasn't learned that lesson.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  210. Re:France has a problem by Teancum · · Score: 1

    Well, obviously there's no law forcing them into ghettos - even France couldn't get away with quite such a blatent violation of US law.

    Are you implying that France has any obligation in regards to US law? I genuinely don't understand your point.

    Isn't France one of the American states?

    '
    '
    '
    It is a joke, get over it.

  211. Re:France has a problem by Javit · · Score: 1

    The fact only has relevance in a racist context, specifically one where people are judged according to their racial group rather than on individual merit.

    --
    Support NRA, America's oldest civil rights group.
  212. Re:France has a problem by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    What are your unconscious presumptions about these populations that makes you link them together when thinking about how to name them?

    There are active campaigns in the form of TV commercials here in the US that place an emphasis on these two.

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  213. Re:Paris McD manager = probably Euro millionaire by niado · · Score: 1

    >So, there you are in a new country with a different culture

    Are you talking about the American tourist with the science-project band-aid spectacles who can only afford to eat in fast food restaurants whilst visiting the greatest gastronomic city on Earth, or the third-generation Parisian restaurant owner with the native passport?

    Knowing what the cost of living in Paris is, versus the squalid living conditions of many minor American academics and generally hilarious wages in the USA (from which you then have to subtract heath insurance and vacation days... LOL), I know which one I'd be looking down on. It's half a million Euros minimum just to start a McDonalds franchise in one location in Europe; in Paris, a shedload more. That chap with the tie in the photos, he's probably the franchise owner, he's probably a millionaire.

    First, Dr. Mann is Canadian.

    Second, McDonalds franchises work similarly in the US. They require large amounts of startup capital and they employ lots of low-wage workers to run the store. The "chap with the tie" in the photos is very likely to be an assistant manager making a few bucks an hour, or at best the store manager making €30k/year. I would be surprised if one of the franchise owners sets foot in the place more than once a month.

    And I don't care how goofy or socially awkward the guy was, it doesn't justify thuggery from these low-lifes, especially store employees.

  214. Re:Are you real? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    I dont think you have been in many major cities. I know for sure there are areas in LA, NY, detroit, toledo, chicago, San Francisco that police are very wary about going.

    --
    Good-bye
  215. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by turbidostato · · Score: 1

    "when the Europeans act stupid suddenly there is silence"

    They were not Europeans; they were French. Even worse they were from Paris!

  216. Re:France has a problem by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    1. You are being racist. Saying you aren't doesn't change facts.
    2. If you had looked at the story, you'd see photographically that all the involved people were white. Not only that, but they were well dressed.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  217. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    Refusing service because of a MEDICAL device, would be grounds for a serious ADA lawsuit in the U.S.

    --
    Good-bye
  218. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by VMaN · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna take a wild stab and guess that it sounded like a decent joke in your own head?

  219. Re:France has a problem by NotSanguine · · Score: 1

    Well, obviously there's no law forcing them into ghettos - even France couldn't get away with quite such a blatent violation of US law.

    Damn right! Those frogs better not violate US law! It's not like they're a sovereign nation with it's own constitution, government and legal system. USA! USA! USA! Oh wait...

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  220. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by icebraining · · Score: 1

    Heilein said settled, not solve. The quote you gave isn't a rebuttal to GP.

  221. Re:France has a problem by Smauler · · Score: 1

    But don't pretend that skin colour makes you more of a "race" or "breed" than hair colour, height, etc.

    No one is. People differentiate races based on hair colour and height all the time. I'm not sure what your point is.

  222. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by NotSanguine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would disagree. You're citing testosterone driven, aggressive behavior which knows no geographic or ethnic bounds. Violence is the choice of idiots.

    Actually, it's "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." --Salvor Hardin

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  223. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    That, too.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  224. Re:France has a problem by Weezul · · Score: 1

    I've never stayed in a shady hostel in Paris. I've stayed with friends in the shady-but-not-bad neighborhoods, like the 11th.

    Afaik, American cities usually have murder rates around or over 20 per 100,0000, but Paris has only 2-2.5 per 100,000 overall and around 5 in the bad St Denis neighborhood.

    Yes, you should avoid the neighborhood with double the murder rate of the rest of the city anywhere, but it's probably no worse than the neighborhood where you go clubbing in your home town, assuming you're American.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  225. Re:France has a problem by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    So, it seems that not only does McDonalds in Paris have some strange issues with cameras, but judging from these comments, a surprising number of French people are racist.

    Burkha ban. Look it up.

    Actually, you're not allowed to wear a burqa there *irrespective* of your race, not only if you're an Arab. There's nothing racist about the ban.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  226. Which would have been the better headline? by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

    [1] "Man Physically Assaulted At McDonald's For Wearing Digital Eye Glasses"
    [2] "Mann Physically Assaulted At McDonald's For Wearing Digital Eye Glasses"

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
  227. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Some+Bitch · · Score: 2

    Ein volk, ein Reich, ein Euro.

  228. Re:France has a problem by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    The underlying question is why, for the love of all that is good in this world, would you eat at a McDonald's in France?
    Perhaps he wanted to get a decent amount of a familiar food for a reasonable price.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  229. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Preemptive defense is still defense. If you wait until you have exhausted all your options you aren't going to be able to accomplish anything with the violence you finally resort to, especially if your opponent knows you can be delayed by lack of clarity.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  230. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by mcgrew · · Score: 2

    You're American aren't you - only an American could be so racist

    Oh, the irony, it burns when you touch it!

  231. Re:France has a problem by joelek · · Score: 1

    African-American ... is the term generally accepted by educated and cultured people in the United States.

    Don't equate PC mainstream media with "educated" or "cultured". I'd say maybe 5% of the people in the US use the term "African-American". "African-American" is the term used by those that like to think they are better than the culture. This does not make them cultured.

  232. Re:France has a problem by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Saying that "French" is a race is like saying "Canadian" or "American" is a race.
    Or "African-American".

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  233. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    You can call it pre-emptive defense, but civility mandates the exhaustion you appear to abhor. I understand inevitability, and I also see the rampant abuse of the excuse..... daily, in headlines across the world to local newspapers.

    There are no absolutes, but there is the bravery of striving to achieve a more peaceful world. For some, dogma and orthodoxy and just plain sociopathy dictate their readiness to use violence. It's instinctive. And for that reason, it's necessary to advance the cause of peace and non-violence.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  234. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by Matje · · Score: 1

    the EU is turning into a pretty violent place

    no it isn't. Keep in mind the 99% of places in the EU (literally) where there is no increase in violence don't make for a good news story.

  235. Re:France has a problem by solidraven · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, the problem with that being that I speak fluent French and didn't even have a camera with me. So what were you saying?

  236. Re:France has a problem by solidraven · · Score: 1

    I've encountered the same behaviour in every single French city I've been to.

  237. Re:something's not right here by sjames · · Score: 1

    So you believe the doctor is lying about his opinion?

    Note that the device is bolted to his skull. I do hope you don't plan to bolt a monkey to your skull. (Perhaps you should get DirecTV?)

  238. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Have you ever wondered about the fate of our species?

    We exist in a time unlike any other; a time where man can go beyond the tyranny of flesh and embrace a new tomorrow.

    We share the belief of a manifest destiny for our species, a future where human instrumentality evolves into a form beyond our crude flesh and blood.

    The next evolution is near, A coming together of man and machine. A synthesis greater than the birth of the human organism.

    This is the Singularity. The God in the Machine.

    Many cultures predict an end to humanity in the near future, a final Armageddon that will end the world; but we disargee.

    We know the future of man.

    Join us. Understand the path that unfolds before our species.

    Grow beyond the bounds of flesh and blood.

    Embrace the Singularity!

  239. Who is the asshole? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    TL;DR: Mod parent down.

    Since the GP was obviously joking, and you are... not obviously joking, I'm going to guess it's you ("Zaphod The 42nd") who are the asshole here. You might want to think a lot more closely about what you post online in the future. I wouldn't even bother replying to such obvious idiocy if it hadn't been modded up.

    P.S. <joke-with-a-care-of-truth>If my parents had tried to take me to McDonalds as any time I was over the age of 6 and knew what food should actually taste like, I'd have assaulted them myself!</joke-with-a-cor-of-truth> Seriously, it's not exactly child abuse or anything, but it certainly isn't behavior I would encourage in any parent... especially if the kids' taste *was* already picky to the point of insisting on junk food.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    1. Re:Who is the asshole? by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I went a little too far. Its hard to judge tone of voice from a line of text. I read a bunch of comments to this effect and I felt like it was semi-serious, lots of people seem to have that sentiment, that "well you shouldn't be eating fast food in france anyways!" like that has anything to do with the issue.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
  240. Re:France has a problem by Vlaix · · Score: 1

    I was reacting to the "disease" qualification of tourists, not to your own story (for which I don't care). As for the shopkeepers and restaurants employees, every French knows that in Paris those are particular cunts. Can't say the same for the rest of the country. On another unrelated matter : it's easy saying "McDonald's shit, why the hell not some real food ?!", but the truth is unless you get a table in some very expensive place, most of what you find in bitros around Paris is utter crap by now ; frozen food cooked by the microwave and sold for the cost of a kidney. It's a city that made a specialty of scamming the tourists (even nationals) and mistreating its patrimony at the same time. The same go for all major French cities, at a lower scale.

  241. Re:France has a problem by hajus · · Score: 1

    I would have to agree that a great part of the problem is that new immigrants anywhere prefer to live with earlier immigrants of their own culture even if conditions are horrible in that location. It just compounds the issue that things are usually harder for immigrants anyways, as they are unfamiliar with the systems already in place in the country they have moved to. But humans prefer the familiar rather than the strange, and just make things harder for themselves in this case.

  242. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Civility does _not_ demand exhaustion of options vs. violence. Once it becomes clear that it's going to happen only a fool would allow their opposition to set the time and place. That will guarantee loss.

    Read 'The Art of War'. Ether version, Chinese or Italian will tell you the same. Think of it as cultural relativity. (Facts that are true, regardless of perspective.)

    The cause of non-violence is not served by losing to an aggressor. If someone says they are going to kill you and they are working on an atom bomb, only an idiot would pass any chances to stop/delay them.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  243. Re:France has a problem by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

    Care to explain??

    --
    Take off every 'sig' !!
  244. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2

    "Anyone who clings to the historically untrue - and thoroughly immoral - doctrine that "violence never solves anything" I would advise to conjure up the ghosts of Napoleon Bonaparte and of the Duke of Wellington and let them debate it. The ghost of Hitler could referee, and the jury might well be the Dodo, the Great Auk, and the Passenger Pigeon. Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and freedoms"

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  245. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by FormOfActionBanana · · Score: 1

    Lutefisk is Norwegian, you RACIST

    --
    Take off every 'sig' !!
  246. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    Indeed there are choices. Impatience versus inevitability are two completely different characteristics that imply differing choices. The Art of War is a book of aggression and suppression. It posits choices that are based on false assumptions, IMHO.

    Has India dropped the bomb? No. Pakistan? No. Israel? No.

    As I believe you're referring to Iran, I will concur that their intentions are plainly evil. These are the intentions of its leaders, not its general populace. How many might die so that the leadership is stanched? How much violence incurred?

    This isn't Chamberlin and appeasement. Tehran could be wiped from the map should they try something. Violence? On an incredible scale. Needless.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  247. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Tehran will be wiped from the map if they use an atom bomb (even if it's not clearly from them. e.g. TelAviv just blows up one day).

    A preemptive strike is relatively non-violent. Assassinating key people is almost care bear. Computer virus' based attacks are care bear.

    Both 'Art of War' books are simply pragmatic guides to military conflict. Curiously both thesis' appear to be 'the art of war is the art of deception'. Cultural relativity (means the opposite of cultural relativism). Given the level of deception going on nobody can ever say that something is 'inevitable'. This is the category of problems that need to be addressed with incomplete and inaccurate information. If you wait for something to be clearly 'inevitable' you have already waited too long.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  248. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    Be pure, be vigilant, behave!

    Eat a Big Mac.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  249. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by quantaman · · Score: 1

    The strong implication in TFA is that the perpetrators were McDonald's employees. Perp 3 was sweeping the floor while wearing a McDonald's uniform, and from the description of the incident the other two were likely some sort of managers who apparently decided he wasn't allowed to wear his digital glasses.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  250. Topical technology by MrLint · · Score: 1

    I'd like to bring this little nugget to all of those commenters who seem to imply "well it says no camreas its his own fault.
    http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/132918-the-laser-powered-bionic-eye-that-gives-576-pixel-grayscale-vision-to-the-blind

    What about a sign make assault acceptable? Perhaps if the persons in question didn't want to be seen my someone else, they should return to their caves. This behavior is indicative of people who only deserve to live in a cave, and do not have a place in modern society.

    PS : I guess blind people in France will have to remain blind if they don't want to run the risk of being beaten to death.

    1. Re:Topical technology by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I guess blind people in France will have to remain blind if they don't want to run the risk of being beaten to death.

      Somewhat hyperbolic, but a reasonable point.

      My comment (emailed to this country's Mcdonalds) was :

      I am highly concerned about the reports of McDonalds staff assaulting a person who uses vision assistance technology. Reports are at http://eyetap.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/physical-assault-by-mcdonalds-for.html
      I use a different sort of vision assistance technology.
      Is it safe for me to visit a McDonalds?

      Now, I don't mention that you'd need several strong men to hold me down to force me to eat a McSludge - no need for them to know that. But an implicit threat to their profitability and PR situation, for the actions of a different country's McDonalds organisation should get awkward questions being asked within the big happy family that is "McDonalds."

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  251. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by OzoneLad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mon aéroglisseur est plein d'anguilles.

  252. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    For those who might not understand why this is funny here is a link the OP forgot to include explaining CASIE.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  253. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    >>A preemptive strike is relatively non-violent. Assassinating key people is almost care bear. Computer virus' based attacks are care bear.

    Tell that to the families of the dead and the injured.

    I've read Sun Tsu's works, and many others. The premises for action are based on tribal behavior, which in a civilized world, we should rise above. Practically speaking, it takes courage and trust and admission that sociopathic tendencies are common place, must be identified, and mitigated.

    The itchy trigger finger pulls from weakness, not from strength. We fight the wars of our ancestors for the rich of the world. Neither quality is worth it. Since the beginning of time, our instinct to fall behind leaders full of pugnacious qualities has thwarted humanity.

    Indeed, there are clearly places where these leaders need to be stopped. Instinctively, we pull triggers, drop bombs, poison, whatever. There are other ways, principally based on usurping power. Read Gandhi and learn. Sun Tzu was astute, but lived in the context of a warrior.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  254. The right cybernetics by The+Mister+Purple · · Score: 1

    What I take away from this is that discrimination against cyborgs is a problem in the world. Accordingly, I will refrain from getting any cybernetic replacements until such point that a full-body prosthetic (a la Ghost in the Shell) is available. Because bullies may beat up a wimpy-looking researcher with fancy glasses, but they'll think twice before messing with Batou.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Feynman
  255. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by hey! · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately they'd retaliate by giving America back to England and apologizing for the whole revolution misunderstanding.

    And believe me, nobody wants an English-inspired McDonalds.

    Steak 'n kids meal, anyone?

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  256. Re:France has a problem by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    They also used to be banned in Turkey. I guess that makes them racist too.

    Do you really need to have someone point out there is a forest in front of you when all you can see are trees?

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  257. Re:France has a problem by gnick · · Score: 1

    Well... It almost is...

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  258. Re:France has a problem by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    Actually, you're not allowed to wear a burqa there *irrespective* of your race, not only if you're an Arab. There's nothing racist about the ban.

    Really? Does your brain really work that way such that you can't see the utter hypocrisy in what you just wrote? Here's a clue for you - if they banned wearing a crucfix, that wouldn't be bigoted either since everyone, not just catholics, would not be allowed to wear a crucifix. Or how about the yarmulke? Banning that wouldn't be racist either since it would apply to everyone, not just jews.

    Still don't get it? Then the only reasonable conclusion is that you are a bigot.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  259. OT: Re your sig... by rthille · · Score: 1

    Isn't Greylisting a lot more like port-knocking than NAT?

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  260. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by couchslug · · Score: 1

    In either case, they are more competent than the majority of Europe.

    Europeans could learn from this if they cared.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  261. Re:France has a problem by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "Islam" is not a race.

    It is a Middle Eastern superstitious ideology.

    Ideology /= race.

    Stop confusing superstition with biology.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  262. Re:France has a problem by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    Really? Does your brain really work that way such that you can't see the utter hypocrisy in what you just wrote?

    What hypocrisy? Since when is claiming that (a burqa-wearing ban blind to race isn't racism) is hypocrisy, and not a simple statement of a fact?

    Here's a clue for you - if they banned wearing a crucfix, that wouldn't be bigoted either since everyone, not just catholics, would not be allowed to wear a crucifix

    So true, and the burqa ban isn't bigoted for the same reason, since I'm not allowed to wear it as well. FYI, the crucifix as a religious symbol is banned in the same context that burqa is banned in, namely in public schools ("Loi encadrant, en application du principe de laïcité, le port de signes ou de tenues manifestant une appartenance religieuse dans les écoles, collèges et lycées publics.")
    Burqa is additionally banned in public by a *different* law ("Loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public") as an illegal form of covering your face, which can be used to, e.g., commit crimes while hiding your identity. Allowed forms of covering your face include, e.g., motorbike helmets, which have a distinct technical purpose. Both allowed and illegal face coverings include multiple kinds of items.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  263. More French Jokes: by mrozone · · Score: 1

    Is fashion the only thing the French are willing to fight for?

  264. Re:France has a problem by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    scientists are in general agreement that race has no biological basis.

    Not so. Sociological concept of race actually correlates pretty well with certain genetic markers - in other words, there are some which cluster in ways that directly correlate to traits that we commonly identify as "white" and "black" and whatever. Those traits are not necessarily related in any meaningful way - it's just a random aggregation - but you can certainly tell one's race from his genetic markup with high confidence.

  265. Re:France has a problem by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

    I'm not a racist, but I might bring up facts and stats that showcase various racial biases that exist in different fields in real life. If you choose to consider them racist, it makes you racist, not me. Racism is discriminating on the basis of race, not discriminating on the basis of other traits that sometimes happen to correlate with race.

  266. Violence is like Duct Tape (or vice versa)... by SkimTony · · Score: 1

    If it's not solving your problem, you're not using enough.

    (I kid!)

  267. Re:France has a problem by euroq · · Score: 1

    Don't get confused, I am not being racist

    Yes you are.

    Technically, just talking about races is not racist. Prejudice + power = racism.

    --
    Just because the U.S. is a republic does not mean it is not a democracy. Democracy/republic are not mutually exclusive.
  268. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    So you'll wait until a major US city is leveled first.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  269. Re:France has a problem by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    Ooh pedant for the fail. Substitute bigot for racist and go drink your milkshake.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  270. Re:France has a problem by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    So true, and the burqa ban isn't bigoted for the same reason, since I'm not allowed to wear it as well ... Burqa is additionally banned in public by a *different* law.

    Lol, did that red herring taste good? "same reason " != "different law." And, as far as I can tell, the law against religious parphenalia was invalided in the 90s becuse of selective enforcement which let the crucifixes pass.

    Burqa is additionally banned in public by a *different* law ("Loi interdisant la dissimulation du visage dans l'espace public") as an illegal form of covering your face, which can be used to, e.g., commit crimes while hiding your identity.

    Yes, because there has been such a crime-wave of burkha wearing bandits, it was absolutely necessary to get this law passed right quick.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  271. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

    Study what Gandhi did when he had power and had to deal with Muslim insurrection. Hint: It wasn't non-violent.

    War is competition for limited resources. It has _nothing_ to do with 'tribalism'. Only fools think we are 'past' limited resources.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  272. Re:This is the norm in France by myriad_sailor · · Score: 1

    Got to correct myself : not rue Saint Antoine but rue Saint Honoré

  273. Re:France has a problem by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Sounds a big bit more dangerous American city I live in.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  274. Re:France has a problem by markdavis · · Score: 1

    Talk about a subject change!

    I find the term "African American" extremely stupid and even offensive, because the same people using the term would not give me the same courtesy and call me "European American" (which would be equally stupid, BUT AT LEAST IT IS EQUAL).

    It is 2012. Why is it we still have to invent all these stupid labels? People's ancestry and skin colors have a HUGE variety and it will continue to get more muddled and confused. Case in point- President Obama is neither "black" nor "African American". He is just an American. Isn't that enough? What if a 10th generation "white" South African becomes an American citizen? Is he "African American"? What if a "black" Haitian becomes an American citizen? Is he "African American"? Ignoring ancestry, then at what point in the skin tonal scale does someone magically become "African American"?

  275. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If they sort out the banlieues it's probably worth it.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  276. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I forget the exact wording, but it's something like:

    Strikes twice as hard the man whose cause is just - yet thrice the one who gets his blow in first.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  277. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I've read Sun Tsu's works, and many others.

    Good for you, wee laddie. Perhaps one day you'll understand them as deeply as you do the lyrics to Kumbayaa.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  278. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    I've studied Gandhi and many, many others. We know, you and I, what Gandhi was about.

    War is about greed. "Competition for limited resources" is a weasel expression. In the Afghan war, it was about the need for revenge. In Iraq, it was the need for oil.

    Are there justified wars? Yes, of course. But this also has to do with leaders and followers, and the spoils, the power, the dominance. The costs are outrageous. The religious will tell you that their reward is in the next life. They were fooled into believing there was a next life for just this very purpose.

    We started this because we were, 3000 years ago, tribes, and today, we are still tribes and behave tribally. We belong to lots of them, whether cheering for a sports team or fawning over the latest operating system release, political party, or new BBQ restaurant. We are animals, and there is a thin line between us and animals called civility. Unless we can stanch the urge to annihilate, we are no better than they are, and given the damage to the planet, far worse.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  279. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    I know that computers are made of binary logic and that many Slashdotters are in the computer industry, but there is a great distance between Kumbayaa and believing that we're capable of stanching war. It's called a scale, and you put me at one end without even knowing me. That's called prejudice.

    You'll be angry now, thinking that I've tried to provoke you. But that's not true, either. It takes a lot of bravery to stand up and say you'll renounce violence and seek peaceful solutions, instead of using your gonads to make your decisions for you. There is every so much strategy out there, skullduggery, and machinations regarding war. We used to have a War Department in the US Presidential Cabinet; we needed a Peace Department. It's cheaper.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  280. Bloody expats by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    Personally I utterly avoid expats from my own country. If they pine for home so much then they can go back there. Problem solved.

  281. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    You've obviously never been to Paris if you think there are any French people (forgive the oxymoron) there.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  282. Re:Mc D. in Paris, really! by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Clearly anyone eating a single meal ever at McDonalds is an unfit parent and gastronomical philistine.

    It's not even possible that they just wanted some quick, familiar food on their way home after a full day experiencing whatever you think qualifies as "real" Paris.

    If McDonalds counts as "familiar" then yeah you are a gastronomic philistine.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  283. Re:Evidence? or just your bias? haircut type? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    News reports that filter to the US based on rioting in Paris. Thought skinheads were restricted to Germany and points east.

    Nice to be modded down for a sincere misunderstanding.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  284. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Kittenman · · Score: 1

    I would disagree. You're citing testosterone driven, aggressive behavior which knows no geographic or ethnic bounds. Violence is the choice of idiots.

    Actually, it's "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." --Salvor Hardin

    And don't forget "It's a poor atom blaster that won't point both ways"

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  285. Re:something's not right here by sjames · · Score: 1

    Get over yourself, please. Let's see how free and open you are with your body parts when a beat cop decides you might have hidden something in your rectum.

  286. PC nonce by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I've lived in Paris. I've also commuted there on a weekly basis. Over two years, total. I'd say he's not far off the truth.

    This may or may not tally with the week you spent there on a GCSE student exchange last year. Perhaps if you'd stuck out the whole fortnight instead of crying to go home to mummy you'd have got a less touristic view.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  287. Surgically fixed by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Is his right eye damaged somehow?

    His eye is okay. But he's a researcher in device which can be also used to help people with reduced vision.
    He's also "eating his own dog food" and actually uses the device he develops.

    If not, then how is the doctor's note supposed to explain his use of the device?

    The device is surgically fixed to his skull. He can't remove it or shut it down "easily". The only way to remove the device would be using proper tools to carefully unscrew it from its skull-grafted mount points.
    He has probably a doctor's note explaining that the mount points are indeed grafted onto his skull, and that the device is securely fixed to them and there's no easy way to remove it.

    Also keep in mind that:
    - this device is supposed to be used as a viewing aid for people with viewing disabilities. the target audience for this device is people who can't do without it, and it thus makes sense that the device is bolted in place instead of wearable. it's akin to a body prosthetic. it can be removed or put back, but it's not designed to do that on a whim.
    - he's been researching such kind of augmentation FOR MORE THAN THE LAST 30 YEARS. He's been spending more than half of his life with this kind of devices. At that point of time, it kind of makes sense that he has mount point surgically grafted onto his skull: you pretty much now he's not suddenly stopping to wear such kind of stuff any time soon.
    Also by having it grafted on him, that helps him being able to constantly field test his reasearch project in real world situation. He'll have them constantly on, and he's also testing the permanent mounts that the potential patient will be using one day.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  288. Re:something's not right here by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    In particular, the device has the ability to take pictures in a way which may be contrary to French law, something the OP took delight in (accidentally?) admitting on his web page.

    Even if it was contrary to French law, which I strongly doubt, that doesn't justify them taking the law into their own hands.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  289. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    What's that say?

    Oh, I give up.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  290. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    How silly.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  291. Re:France has a problem by locketine · · Score: 1

    Well I live in one of the safest cities in the US so I really don't have safety problems where I live but the murder rate in my favorite bar hopping city (Portland, OR) is 4 per 100,000. I've spent more time there than in Paris yet have seen no crimes in Portland which makes me think that murder doesn't necessarily correlate with crimes against tourists or near areas of interest for tourists.

    Despite my experiences in Paris I would still tend to agree with you that it's a very safe place to live/visit as long as you know which areas to avoid.

    --
    Think globally but act within local variable scope.
  292. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Everything past basic shelter and survival calories is greed. Resources (energy, water, land etc) are limited. Attempts to deny these basic facts put you firmly into fantasy land.

    Real causes of war are not discussed openly. We are/were in Iraq to fuck with our nominal allies as well as our nominal enemies. You shouldn't expect to hear 're-starting the sunni/shei war will drain blood, energy and money from the Saudi and Yemeni wahabists and the Iranians' on CNN. Getting two enemies to fight each other is as old as the hills.

    Finally at least give 'The Art of War' by Machiavelli a skim. (Much of his advice is formulaic and relates only to war at the time, skip that part.) War is never as simple as you make it out to be.

    We are still tribal. But we don't fight wars based on tribe. ([ Cartman ] I do hate the 'deadhead' tribe though, they suck. My tribe dances in Mosh pits, not fluttering around like an aquarium weed. [ /Cartman ] I digress.)

    Before you can get past being an 'animal' you have to satisfy the animal needs. This is impossible to do for everybody. Animal needs are irrational so that will always be so. Capitalism works because it works with our natural impulses, like greed.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  293. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by slick7 · · Score: 1

    Be pure, be vigilant, behave!

    Actually, if the naturals want to win, shouldn't they misbehaving... a lot.. and winning by force of numbers

    The only thing the French are good at hosting, is an invasion.

    --
    The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  294. Re:the guy deserved it by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    If I'm in a restaurant and some guy's taking pictures of me and my family then I'd ask him to stop.

    He wasn't filming, and they didn't ask him to stop - they kicked seven shades of shite out of him.

    For all anyone knows the guy could be a paedophile getting his rocks off.

    Well take comfort in the face that only you get to fuck them.

    Rest binned unread, just in case stupidity is contagious.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  295. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by slycendice · · Score: 1

    So unfair generalizations about Americans are wrong but unfair generalizations about Europeans are ok? Yeah, there are some messed up people in Paris, so they represent all Europeans?

  296. Re:something's not right here by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    He probably had one, but was tired of cleaning up after it.

  297. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Informative

    So the Germans work in factories making Porsches and BMWs and send them Greece where they're bought by people who have never done an honsest day's work in their lives.

    When I say "bought", I mean that they pay for them with money borrowed from the Germans, that they then refuse to repay.

    Those evil fucking Nazi bastards! What Teutonic cunning came up with the duplicitous plan of giving people stuff for doing nothing? It's 1940 all over again.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  298. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    We must continue to disagree. Quality of life is different for different people. Using your simple metric doesn't speak to the issue that humanity has endless curiosity.

    Animal needs are entirely rational, and we are animals. We're really deadly, too. Civility requires, even mandates that we find those ways needed for cogent survival. The Prince was a sociopath, just as Ayn Rand is. Capitalism is an expression of value. It doesn't have to be greedy, but it can be. Like most tribes, there are leaders, followers, shamans, and they interact that way today, both wittingly, and unwittingly. It is, who we are.

    We can rise above violence. It takes guts and courage and patience and other things that are non-reactive, non-provocative. The rewards can be tremendous. The tensions among Islamic and neo-Islamic, Jewish, Christian, and non-monotheists are going to be pretty high. We can thank the Alewi and others whose philosophies are tolerance. If it weren't for some strong Turks, the eastern Mediterranean and Gulf of Aqaba would run red.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  299. Uncanny by markjhood2003 · · Score: 1

    Collectively we humans are a primitive bunch. We can't even handle differences in skin color without inspiring murder and war.

    Imagine increasing numbers of privileged people with the resources for self-augmentation actually wandering around with pieces of metal and electronics permanently protruding from their faces (especially hardware that gets in the way of eye contact). I could see a bit of a problem with societal acceptance, especially if there's no way to know if they are recording your interactions with them.

    Until such self-augmentation becomes invisible in casual encounters I'd say it's a really bad idea to make them permanent.

  300. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

    I think you just got voted -1, Slashdot moderators don't get satire about French politics.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  301. Steve Mann, hypocrite by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

    Considering all the campaigning the guy has done about privacy rights, it's totally bizarre that he's recording 24/7, even when he goes to private businesses with a reasonable expectation that you wouldn't be recording. Then when somebody attacks him for it, he mails their photographs and id cards to all the national embassies he can, and posts face-redacted photographs to the internet.

    I guess when the shoe's on the other foot, he's actually opposed to privacy rights.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Steve Mann, hypocrite by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      There is a "reasonable expectation of privacy" in retail business premises?

      Not around here there isn't. If you've got a business that is open to the public, you don't have an expectation of privacy. In areas behind a receptionist, or a locked door, then the argument might be different, so you can stack your disease-ridden floor wipes in a locked cupboard perfectly happily. But if you use them to smear germs all over the floor while the shop is open and full of customers, you're liable to get photographed.

      When you get to the bottom of it, the perps are likely to argue that they thought he was a paediatrician (yes, I do know what that means).

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  302. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Since most of the French population is white, then there's a good chance the attackers were white.

    Except where it doesn't work that way. This summer in Chicago, IL, ~180 gun deaths so far this year. In a 32% white city, somewhere north of 80% of the victims and perpetrators were black or brown.

    We can argue cause (genetics, aftereffect of slavery, social standing, etc.) but what can't be argued are rather black and white statistics showing that blacks are disproportionately victims and perpetrators of various crimes. (This is US, FR may be different.)

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  303. Re:Evidence? or just your bias? haircut type? by khallow · · Score: 1

    Evidence please, references? or just a racist rant?

    Well, we do have his post as evidence of his expectations. That seems rather straightforward.

  304. Re:France has a problem by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Ignoring ancestry, then at what point in the skin tonal scale does someone magically become "African American"?

    You've never heard of the 'paper bag test', have you? (A black coworker told me about it. Get off my ass mods.)

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  305. Re:France has a problem by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    Most of those US murders are drug related. One gang moving in on the territory of another or some such nonsense. Remove those numbers from the equation, and the results are staggeringly better. The odds of a tourist catching a bullet, while not non-zero, are much lower than your statistics indicate.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  306. Re:France has a problem by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    I've encountered the same behaviour in every single French city I've been to.

    That doesn't necessarily mean the problem is them...

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  307. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I have an animal need to be the alpha male. (To attract females, don't ask me why anybody would want more then one. It's how our minds are wired.) So does everybody else. All these animal needs can't be satisfied at the same time.

    Calling aspects of human nature Sociopathic doesn't change them. You can't escape your own inner animal. Resource remain limited. We aren't going to forming 'Internationals' and singing 'Kumbia', ever. Human societies are always competitive as well as cooperative. Pretending there are no winners is foolish, dismissing them all as sociopaths sounds like a religious position.

    You have to put Rand in context. She was a child during the Russian revolution and saw Marxism's inescapable flaw play out (concentration of power, same as any planned economy). Government minding it's own business could be a third leg of a mixed economic philosophy (add the principle of 'when in doubt mind your own business' to modern capitalism/welfare state dualism.).

    You need to talk to some Greeks/Kurds/Armenians regarding the Turks. They are bastards like the rest of us.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  308. Re:something's not right here by sjames · · Score: 1

    The glasses are bolted to his skull. Mann cannot remove them. Technically, a prosthetic leg isn't 'medically necessary' either, it's just that a lot of amputees find them more functional (and dignified) than scooting around on the floor.

    Do you know what it's called if you grab a guy who is acting like a dick? Assault!

    As for taking photographs, what is the threshold there? Is it OK to assault a man using a JORDY

    How about those few people using an implant into their visual cortex and a head mounted camera? Shall they be blinded again?

  309. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by overmod · · Score: 1

    No, it's the supersonic sheep that's in French. But top points anyway! Fetchez la vache!

  310. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by overmod · · Score: 1

    No, they should apologize to the Kingdom of Great Britain and offer to pull the arrow out of Harold's eye...

  311. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    Understanding sociopathy is one of my research areas. Gotta call them as I see them. Rand qualifies; it's all about Rand with no remorse for the rest of us. Circumstances can bend you away from humanity; it happens too often. Violence is one of these circumstances. Survivors of violence have trauma that can change them forever. Some were predisposed, others made.

    I have no misgivings nor praise for the Turks; but the Alewi broke much ground. Yes, there have been horrible factional genocide attempts against Kurds, Greeks, Albanians, Armenians, Yezidi, and others. The remarkable thing is that Turks aren't really Turks, they're many factions and the Alewi and Sufi-ish like factions took control and bred a forceful tolerance with lots of blood on the way. Ugly way to get there. The effect is: what now remains after horrific struggle is a probable and usable model for Middle Eastern tolerance.

    Tolerance is often absent, and the Lebanese version almost succeeded, then failed. The Druze have also been a peaceful factor in the maelstrom of conflicting ideals.

    Alpha male is a tribal hold-over. Except for loners, alphas need betas, etc. There is an instinctive component to this. It can be learned, but it's often deeply limbic. And I don't care. We need leaders, but we also need ethics and pride in them. Causal non-violence is something to aspire to. The survivors remember you longer.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  312. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by flyneye · · Score: 1

    I recall the tale of a friend of mine who lived in southern California in the early 80s. He lived a few blocks from one where a mental case shot a bunch of people up.His brother were skinheads who robbed Mexican drug mules and got him hooked on Heroin. His father threw him in rehab, then moved him to Phoenix to get him away from the bad element. Must've worked, he was a methamphetamine addict when I met him. Likely graduated to dead by the late 80s. He was 17, he looked in his 40s.

    Yes McDonalds (in large cities),makes me think of drive by shootings, ethnic violence, hard drugs, this is America. What is happenin' at your local McDrugheads tonight? The rest of the time McDonalds is selling garbage to kill the masses and control population worldwide like a responsible, green, Fortune 500 overlords.

    Then there's the tales of LSD at the burger clown drive thru, or what you do to waitresses in the walk-in freezer, when there's no customers around...

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  313. Re:France has a problem by ExCEPTION · · Score: 1

    The underlying question is why, for the love of all that is good in this world, would you eat at a McDonald's in France?

    To have real FRENCH fries of course.

  314. Re:France has a problem by jd · · Score: 1

    What about the Tour de France?

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  315. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    You're imagining a difference where none exists.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  316. Re:France has a problem by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

    French people are people that have a French passport. So citizenship and ethnicity, yes, but ancestry or culture, no. There is the distinction of "culturally French", meaning needing little time to adjust to French society, for instance coming from the former colonies or the French-speaking part of Belgium.

    [QUOTE]USAGE In recent years, the associations of race with the ideologies and theories that grew out of the work of 19th-century anthropologists and physiologists has led to the use of the word race itself becoming problematic. Although still used in general contexts (: race relations,: racial equality), it is now often replaced by other words that are less emotionally charged, such as people(s) or community.[QUOTE]

    And as to quote the Argentinian wife of the Dutch Royal heir: "There is no such thing as a Dutch/French/Argentinian identity."

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  317. Large Buffer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mann claims that the device stores images in a ring buffer. Unless the device stops working, they'll get overwritten.

    Ok, the device got damaged, so he can show some interesting last pictures. It seems to be a reasonable large buffer, with pictures showing the cashier and the incident (even the guy flipping his name tag).

    I wonder if there are good algorithms to process several minutes of visual recording in real-time in order to enhance the user's current vision? Like identifying/tracking persons or SLAM?

  318. Re:France has a problem by solidraven · · Score: 1

    Then do explain to me why I never run into problems like that anywhere else?

  319. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by unitron · · Score: 1

    Seriously, one would think that putting a McDonald's in Paris would constitute an assault all by itself.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  320. Re:Run Away! Right in Front of Your Family by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
    Heh. Blah blah blah.

    Try reading my comment next time rather than assuming the first random comment that pops into your mind is apropos (hint: I chose my words quite carefully).

  321. Re:France has a problem by Trogre · · Score: 2

    Perhaps the food served in McDonalds US, France, Canada is different to that in New Zealand. Here it's pretty damned nice. The people who rag on McDonalds here are generally hipsters who don't like anything "mainstream", or vegans.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  322. Re:France has a problem by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

    Lebanese also speak french and come to France...

    --
    120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
  323. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You know what this would lead to, that the Danes would like to have a word about who are the rightful owners of England.

  324. Re:Mc D. in Paris, really! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    What the hell. Anyone one would travel the world, choose to give their children an opportunity to learn Parisian french and would then choose to go to a Mc Donalds, in Paris, in France, the home of gastromomy deserves to get smacked upside the head. geez.

    Quite true, Paris has wonderful places to eat. However the problem was that he was smacked upside the head for the wrong reason and by the wrong people.

    Also McDonalds should not employ thugs, or allow any of its franchise's to do so. That is seriously bad for the company image.

    I'm reminded of this picture: http://im.glogster.com/media/13/41/16/62/41166214.jpg

  325. Re:France has a problem by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    You have that wrong. A racist is anyone who states or in any way implies that all races are not identical. The truth value of any statements made by the supposed racist have nothing to do with it. See the endless flame war on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence for more information.

    Racism has a very low burden of proof because essentially everyone is guilty, it is also a very serious crime. That makes it a convenient tool to attack people with even when race has nothing to do with the situation.

    This story is about thugs who work for McDonalds assulting customers. Race really isn't involved anywhere.

  326. Re:France has a problem by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    In Germany it's fairly obvious that the economists are right: McD's and BK's business concepts revolve not around being cheap or good but around being ubiquitous. Subway, kebab shops and Chinese takeaway shops (to name common options in Germany) are all usually better and the latter two are also cheaper. But wherever you are there's always a McD or a BK nearby.

    And so you pay five bucks for a not very Big Mac that's virtually taste-free even with salt and pepper, some mediocre fries and a coke while the same money could've bought you a tastier doner kebab where the salad component alone packs more nutrients than the entire McD offering. Plus the same coke. Of course it depends on whether you like cacik.

    A German public-service TV station recently did a little report where they had test persons exclusively eat at one certain kind of restaurant for... a month, I think. The guy who went to the burger chain ended up paying the most and being the least enthusiastic about his next meal while the guy who went to eat Chinese every day paid comparatively little and was much less apprehensive.

    This matches up with my experience: My workplace lies next to a small mall that has most of the above options plus two bakeries. Generally speaking the Chinese is cheap and okay, the doner stall is slightly more expensive and good, the bakeries are again slightly more expensive but are great if you don't mind a cold dinner and the BK is utterly bland and almost twice as expensive as the Chinese. It also has the distinction of keeping you sated for the shortest amount of time.

    No matter what the ads say, the big burger chains don't even try to compete on quality or price. At least not anywhere I've ever been.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  327. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by AnnaZed · · Score: 1

    It is not necessary to know the backgrounds or the ethnicity, it would be nice to know the addresses though, in case one needed a victim when abroad.

    Ummm, the address is right there in the article. Perhaps you need to augment your vision.

  328. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by doccus · · Score: 1

    Or just stay out of Europe. In case you've not seen the news lately, the EU is turning into a pretty violent place with citizens attacking police & vice versa.

    No kidding.. I'd say that the EU is self-destructing.. from the inside..

  329. Re:France has a problem by ddyer-bennet · · Score: 1

    Well, yeah, saying some *group* is "all like" something-or-other is pretty much the definition of "bigoted". Most especially a group people are born into rather than self-selecting; at least MENSA people mostly *are* smart.

  330. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the irony that Germany seems to be annexing Europe due to an economic disaster caused by a global conspiracy amongst bankers is amusing.

    --
    ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  331. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by Naso540 · · Score: 1

    Hey it is the "permanently attached and does not come off my skull..." part that I would be worried about.

  332. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    let them at it, after that the teeps just have to clean up and take over, sounds like a plan

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  333. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by Phoghat · · Score: 1

    Your post is rated "Funny", but I fear that it has te ring of truth to it. Maybe a lot more than you realize

    --
    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  334. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by cameloid · · Score: 1

    ...and have no truck with the alien too!

    --
    -- Cisk for the Cisk God
  335. please sue mcdonalds by peawormsworth · · Score: 2

    This is a message directed to Steven Mann:

    In the article u asked: "I don't have the resources to take on a branch of a large multi-national corporation operating in a distant country, but I could use some help and advice as to how to resolve this matter, how to ensure it doesn't happen again to me or anyone else wearing Eye Glass"

    You need to sue McDonalds if you want to ensure the safety of future consumers. It is your responsibility to contact a lawyer who is willing to make them pay financially for this act of prejudice. No change will occur unless you do something to make them notice. McDonalds will only notice if a significant amount of profit is taken from them.

    Even if you do not wish to be personally compensated for this public assult, you still need to find a lawyer who is willing to take money from McDonalds in order to have them notice. If you dont do this, nothing will happen and prejudicial treatment and possibly assult will occur to others less strong then you.

    Please step up and make a difference. Contact a lawyer. It is not bad or evil thing to make them pay for this. This behaviour needs to change and McDonalds has no business defending such behaviour at any of their establishments.

    A policy that requires no cameras in an establishment cannot be enforced due to the previlence of cell phones. I do not think they have a requirement that no cell phones are allowed to be used within McDonalds... how could they? The demographic is too large. Simply because you stood out as "different" they treated you differently then the thousands of others who take photos with cell phones and are not so obvious. They should have called the police to remove you from the estabilishment since they had already taken your money as a customer while the camera was in full site and the employees were already aware of its usage. To take ur money and then refuse to provide you with the opportunity to eat the food is not fullfilling the contract you estabilished when u gave them the money and they provided the food.

    Well Im not a lawyer, but I think this is something for which they are totally liable. They damaged your equipment so it will be apparent that physical force was used. You have their pictures and location so the parties involved can be held accountable. They destroyed personal property including a note from a doctor.

    I believe u have a case and if so it should be easy to find a lawyer to assist you in holding McDonalds financially responsible for damages. Please do the right thing here and contact a lawyer about suing McDonalds in general and this establishment and the employees who assulted you.

  336. Re:Not really surprised by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    But it's not a real McDonalds it's just some franchise with the name over the door. Is this the normal experience for McDonalds customers? I've never been to one myself, but it doesn't make me want to try it.

    Most McDonalds are francised I believe. Wikipedia states that only 15% are owned by McDonalds corporate. So what exactly are u saying? That you should only expect quality service 15% of the time and the other times you should be treated in random and prejudice ways?

  337. you r all rediculous by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    I cannot believe the number of people who are choosing not to hold the restaraunt liable for this. The way he was treated was wrong and the way they handled it was wrong. The establishment took his money in a contract of sale. They could have refused him service since they already had knowledge of the device and its purpose. Instead they took his money and subsequently treated him as if he was not a welcome customer. It doesnt matter whether one guy said it was ok to be a customer and later some other employees decided it was not ok. They should have called the police instead of taking physical action on an established customer after the contract of sale was completed. They should be held fully accountable and forced to answer for this rediculous rule about cameras and how they enforce it. From the tone of most replies here, I tend to think this article is being replied to by McDonalds staff.

  338. please sue mcdonalds by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    Mr Mann should sue mcdonalds. Even if Mr Mann only wants to be rembused for physical damages I should hope that some lawyer will put a significant financial dent in this establishment and mcdonalds corporate. Even if he doesnt do this for himself, he should do this for others after him. This is a stupid policy and even stupider enforcement. McDonalds will only recognize this when it costs them money. Please sue this establishment, those employees and mcdonalds. It is the right thing to do.

  339. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by CrzyP · · Score: 1

    Well well, isn't someone the white supremacist? AKA douche.

  340. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by CrzyP · · Score: 1

    Ello, ello, ello, ello white America assassinate my characta.

  341. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by thefixer(tm) · · Score: 1

    Although the French attacking McDonald'sis a nice thought, eventually they'd lose the war and we'd have to bail them out...again.

  342. Re:Either this story misses a lot of details or by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, we only have one side of the story - it appears they are rather sensitive to anything that looks like a camera, but where would that stop? Ordinary glasses? Hearing aids? Walking sticks OK?

    It should stop at damaging ones personal property for no reason. Mann handed them a note written by a doctor. What possible reason would there be to rip it up? It seems like pure intimidation by staff acting like security without any training on how to do it. If I were a judge, this would be enough to cause me to believe that the staff were not treating Mann fairly in their attempt to eject him from the premises. They really should have just stuck to physically removing him from the restaraunt instead of damaging his personal property for no reason except to inflame the situation.

    Also, the restaraunt could have refused to take his money and conduct business with him while the unit was attached. Instead the staff choose to take his money and provide him with food in a contract of sale. Its unlikely that the sales agent didnt notice his prostetic. The contract of sale could have been refused, but it was accepted. So the subsequent ejection appears to be a breach of contract. Especially since ever mcdonalds I ever went to asks whether the food is "to go". If such a question is usually asked of each customer, then it will be difficult to defend the subsequent actions by staff.

  343. Re:Not really surprised by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    only 15% of mcdonalds restraunts are owned by mcdonalds corporate. Are u suggesting that 85% of the restraunts are "not real" and that we can expect "random ejections" most of the time?

  344. Re:Very Suspicious by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    In the article, he posts images from what seems to be very far back in his narrative of events. He shows the 'Possible Witnesses' as he described them well before his assault. If his visual system only stored images after or as it was damaged, I could accept images of the attackers themselves.

    This whole story seems to be missing something.

    Maybe ur right. Maybe the device records all the time. So what. They can not have known either way. Wat we do know is that mcdonalds took his money while wearing it. We know that after mcdonalds had his money that the same device was such a problem that he had to leave. You cannot deny that money was taken from MrMann and that this money could have been refused prior to the assult.

  345. Re:I like me..... by peawormsworth · · Score: 1

    ..... I do not need to be tracked by any person with digital eye glasses. How do I know what they record and what they do with it..... I say digital head mount glasses should be banned in general since it is an intrusion on privacy for all those who walk on the street!

    I say... all people that wear Google glasses or any other like device should be sentenced to death for ignorance and being an idiot!

    Yes, there should be a ban on cell phone usage in public. Cell phones should only be used at home where the camera is safely pointed away from my children. I just know all those people "talking" on the phones are really recording my kids and digitally pasting their faces to make kiddie porn. When will citizens realize that everyone deserves privacy while in public? Its self evident that people who take pictures in public are sickos. But the worst offenders are businesses with their so called "security cameras" pointed out into the storefront sidewalks and streets. You just know they are doing all kinds of horrible things with the video they collect 24/7. When will public space be private again? When will our children be safe?

  346. Re:something's not right here by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

    Pray for Mojo

  347. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Stranglehold meaning they "hasnt managed to run their economy into the ground yet", of course.

  348. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    . I appreciate that in the US "Oriental" isn't PC

    Im not sure that its "in the US" that its not PC; ive heard from folks who live there (as well as folks who are themselves Chinese) that the term is indeed insulting, on the level of calling a Scotsman Irish.

  349. Re:Not really surprised by biodata · · Score: 1

    I'm saying I don't go there.

    --
    Korma: Good
  350. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by alfredos · · Score: 2

    Or just stay out of Europe. In case you've not seen the news lately, the EU is turning into a pretty violent place with citizens attacking police & vice versa.

    I heard the US is full of mad people with big guns who keep going to McDonald's and make the larger carnagge ever.

    There, are we done with stupid stereotypes? Or should we Europeans continue counter-attacking with the stupid lost American tourist?

    Only on slashdot - stupid and desperately misinformed stereotypes modded 5 insightful.

  351. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by BlackSheepBahBah · · Score: 1

    Incorrect. Americans were the only group of people to nearly wipe out an entire indigenous ethnic group. In colonial africa they were merely suppressed. And to bring an ethnic group to the brink of extinction in a land mass the size of north america is quite a feat.

  352. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Anthony · · Score: 1

    My favourite French expression. Haven't met a French person who gets it though.

    --
    Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  353. Re:something's not right here by Lisias · · Score: 1

    Yes. Yes, it is. You can't set up a device to break the law somehow (the clasical example is the booby trap) and then claim that it's not your fault because someone else triggered it. Arguably, because it was already recording images, it was already breaking the law. That it's just a "buffer" may or may not be relevant.

    You are not allowed to bring dogs into some public (and private) facilities. But if you are visually impaired, there's a exception for you.

    Anyway, your interpretation for "recording" can be challenged. What's a recording? If instead of storing the temporary images, they were kept in RAM, that's recording too? If so, these new laser prostectics will render the users locked in home!

    --
    Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
  354. Re:France has a problem by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    Culture indeed, us Northern European/White folk are more reserved and tend to err on the side of being non confrontational and/or apologising when things weren't even their fault (especially us english). Arabs and Africans tend to be direct and to the point, which isn't to say they're Aggressive, quite frankly I prefer it, the western Passive-Aggressive society in which I've been raised is in my opinion illogical (captain).

    So yeah, when a bunch of Arabs start yelling at you and you're used to the White approach of the manager having a word with you off to the side you're going to get a culture shock.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  355. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Personal home ADDRESSES,plural, perhaps you should give your vision augmenters a bit of a wipe.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  356. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    There is actually a traditional french solution to this problem : Burn down McDonalds.

    Oh! I thought that it would be more appropriate to cut off their heads!

  357. Re:disgusting beasts by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    Aside from a proclivity to fart in my direction, what is so disgusting about French men?

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  358. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by TaxDoktor · · Score: 1

    Statistically most Americans do come across as "dumb" or "ignorant" to other countries. For whatever reason most Americans seem to be very uneducated about the rest of the world. I am not saying Americans are less intelligent, just uneducated about other countries compared to European's, Canadian's, etc. Plus being the only country in the world still clinging to an antiquated Standard Measurement system doesn't help, lol.

  359. Re:France has a problem by makomk · · Score: 1

    Are you implying that France has any obligation in regards to US law? I genuinely don't understand your point.

    Sorry, EU law. Not sure why I wrote US (though I think the US does have laws against that too). Technically I think it might be something that the European Court of Human Rights would deal with rather than the EU itself, but signing up for that is a mandatory part of EU membership.

  360. Re:France has a problem by makomk · · Score: 1

    Typo. I actually meant to write EU there. The EU's human rights framework is actually stricter on human rights in some ways than the US constitution, and anti-discrimination law is one of them. (They're not nearly as rigid about free speech as the US' First Amendment is though.)

  361. Re:Either this story misses a lot of details or by cheros · · Score: 1

    I don't know Mann, of course, but I wonder if it wasn't enough to ask him to leave?

    Normal adverse customer handling starts with a polite request to address whatever is causing the adversity, followed by a request to leave if the desired correction is not forthcoming. AFAIK, only if you follow that process you are in a sensible legal position - but I am unaware of any situation where subsequent use of violence is permitted (I don't think you can call the events just physical removal - damage occurred).

    Your point of accepting his money is a good one - at that point it is reasonable to assume there was no adversity, which then sets the handling by a subset of staff apart as possible personal assault.

    Not that it matters much if the police isn't even remotely interested.. That is a very corrosive thing to happen to any society.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  362. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by jschmitz · · Score: 1

    the singularity is upon us!!

  363. Re:Something doesn't seem right... by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

    Transiently implies that the image data would fade/dissapear passively over time. No, the images are written into a (circular) buffer for processing. The images he takes would not dissapear unless they were over-written by subsequent images.

    No, you're being too narrow. Transient only means that in the context of physics or math. In English it simply means temporary, and a circular buffer is exactly what I meant when I used the term. No semantic games please.

    Also, you have no insight on how his device actually works. Your statement also shows a complete lack of understanding of how digital image/signal processing work.

    Wrong again. I'm a senior software developer for a company that builds medical image processing software. I am intimately familiar with both digital imaging and signal processing. You need to be careful about your assumptions.

    How can you assert that the device was clearly running fine after the initial impact. It could have loosened some pins or wires to the power supply, causing juice to drain out slowly, but still allowing the data acquisition part of the device to collect more data.

    Perhaps "fine" was a too ambiguous, but this is exactly my point, the device was still running and did not come to a "hard stop". In his post he makes it sound like the latter situation occurred, which it clearly did not. I could understand how recording could be called accidental if the device suffered a complete failure, and later he went in and retrieved the photos from the circular buffer. However, this is obviously NOT the case because many of the photos are from *after* when the impact to the device occurred, if the above "circular buffer" scenario were the correct one, it would only have images from *before* the impact.

    The scenario you suggest is, I believe, precisely what actually happened. If so, then the recording cannot be construed as "accidental". If the damage was minor (e.g. loose cable disconnecting data acquisition from data processing as you suggest), and the system records images in this condition for later retrieval - THEN IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN DESIGNED THAT WAY. Since he designed the system, he would have known that it would be recording after the impact. As such, he cannot claim that the images were captured accidentally. It was entirely deliberate and intentional on his part because he DESIGNED THE SYSTEM TO DO SO. In this circumstance, most systems I have ever seen with a similar feature will record the images to a more permanent backup location until connection to the data processor is restored. They certainly *don't* record them to the transient circular buffer used for processing during normal functioning.

  364. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by cwsumner · · Score: 1

    Now, that is actually funny! 8-)

  365. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by nobaloney · · Score: 1

    I've got a better idea: just avoid McDonalds.

  366. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

    Look into the ties between American and British banking, and you might decide that the word "back" is inappropriate.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  367. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by posimosh · · Score: 1

    So the Germans work in factories making Porsches and BMWs and send them Greece where they're bought by people who have never done an honsest day's work in their lives.

    When I say "bought", I mean that they pay for them with money borrowed from the Germans, that they then refuse to repay.

    Those evil fucking Nazi bastards! What Teutonic cunning came up with the duplicitous plan of giving people stuff for doing nothing? It's 1940 all over again.

    You have no idea what you are talking about

  368. Re:brave nerd on bleeding edge of wearable nerdine by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    you gotta let the insults slide. If every dumbass stereotype on Slashdot gets you upset, you'll either have to stop reading, or be upset all the time.

  369. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

    "Competition for limited resources" is a weasel expression.

    ...until those resources start running low.

    It's easy to preach 'peace at all costs' with a full belly and from a warm armchair.

    A quick mental peek at history pulls up the Maya: self-annihilated by civil war thanks to a long drought, which in turn cut short the amount of food and clean water they needed to survive in the numbers they had when it began.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  370. Re:What is/are the race of the attackers? by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    Not if our government keeps bending over when the other EU states scream for bailout money. A few more years of that, and Germany will be as bankrupt as Greece. That will be the end of German economic domination in the EU.

    A disgruntled German who really dislikes his government's policy of trying to keep the Euro intact at all costs :-(

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  371. Re:France has a problem by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Yes, because the locals would be known, so they hire traveling Canadians to spy on their behalf.

  372. Re:France has a problem by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    2012-07-17

    2012-07-29

    You must be some sort of slashdot archaeologist.

  373. Re:France has a problem by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    The official definition in the US is you are what you claim to be. Given 5th generation white South Africans may identify as European, I'd say that there's no issue in the Politically Correct world (a world created by the non-PC people to make fun of those who told them they can't call blacks niggers anymore).

  374. Re:Mc D. in Paris, really! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Have you ever been in a McDonald's in Paris? It's filled with locals. Apparently, they think it better than the local fare.

  375. Re:France has a problem by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Nah, just a full time worker with 2 children. I get around to Slashdot on the weekends, often reading last weeks stories for the first time on a Saturday or Sunday, or the one following.