Slashdot Mirror


TechTV Cracks Open The Xbox

Kevin writes: "TechTV has posted some pictures of the inside of the Xbox ... Interesting stuff, I believe Patrick Norton from The Screen Savers is working on overclocking it." Warning: doing this might reduce your eBay resale value.

400 comments

  1. Warning by jdc180 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Warning:
    By opening, you might let out the intel!

  2. its a PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    surprise, surprise

  3. Pretty cool pics by PigeonGB · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Too bad I don't have a few hundred to spend on a new computer to crack open and look at. Oh wait...I can easily make my own video game console system, can't I?
    I wish there was more to this article, because then there might be more to my response to it.

    --
    I have 3656.9 Bogomips. How many Bogomips do you have?
    1. Re:Pretty cool pics by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      "Oh wait...I can easily make my own video game console system, can't I?"

      Sure, if you spend several hundred dollars more for parts, rack up 3rd party developers, and get the FCC to approve the final product. Have a blast.

  4. So, uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How upgradable are these things? Does the socket type adhere to an intel standard? I should hope so, considering people have been saying that Halo gets 5fps at some times. Snort.

    1. Re:So, uh by DWARFx10 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Your Kidding, that sucks

    2. Re:So, uh by act6-oZZ · · Score: 1

      umm.. Halo doesn't drop in frames at all.. it's fast all the time... no chop. .the xbox is actually really nice.

      --
      -oZZ www.act6.org
    3. Re:So, uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      (cough) Astroturf! (cough)

  5. Hmmm... by Wavicle · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Rather light on information, even for slashdot... Still, it looks like a hackable box. Since consoles are generally sold at a loss, the Xbox could find itself a popular distributed computing node. We'll probably have to do an old TiVo trick and make a hard drive image backup before plugging in the unit... Then let the hacking begin.

    Of course, MS almost certainly has used a proprietary filesystem to thwart such an effort. And reverse engineering such surely violates the DMCA.

    --
    Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
    Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    1. Re:Hmmm... by muffen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And reverse engineering such surely violates the DMCA
      You do know that there are other countries than the US where people do have PC knowledge. The DMCA does not apply to these countries. Also, how many reverse-engineer projects do you think has been discontinued or never started due to the DMCA??
      I'm guessing zero!!

    2. Re:Hmmm... by t0qer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're prolly using NTFS, I betcha balloons to bannana's if MS did try and accuse someone of trying to break thie proprietary filesystem all it would take is any kind of NT license to thwart the DMCA.

    3. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And reverse engineering such surely violates the DMCA

      Do you know what the DMCA is? It is there to "protect" copyrighted works. Reverse engineering is legal if there is no content being copied.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by mangu · · Score: 1
      Rather light on information, even for slashdot...


      A perfect application of an understatement. If there was moderation for articles, this one would get (-1, offtopic).


      the Xbox could find itself a popular distributed computing node.


      First Beowulf Cluster Post?

    5. Re:Hmmm... by DarkZero · · Score: 1
      Actually, DeCSS simply reverse engineer's the CSS encryption on DVDs. And that researcher's paper (sorry, his name escapes me) on SDMI just talks about vulnerabilities in SDMI. Neither of these copy copyrighted works. Especially the research paper, because research papers are incapable of copying things on their own. Both DeCSS and the research paper, however, were stopped by the DMCA, and I believe both are still in litigation.

      DeCSS prohibits reverse engineering and the breaking of encryption. The laws against copying copyrighted works are completely seperate from the DMCA and existed long before it. If all the DMCA did was prohibit the copying of copyrighted works, then there wouldn't be such a fuss about it, because those books have been on the books for many, many years.

      Do YOU know what the DMCA is? Apparently not.

    6. Re:Hmmm... by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      I was tempted to make a direct reference to the beowulf thing, but that'd look too much like Karma Whoring :)

      I wonder if that GPU has an underlying instruction set? A cluster node doesn't really have need for a high performance graphics chip, but it'd be a shame to see all that power go to waste. Maybe somebody could port seti@home (or my personal favorite Folding@home) to the GeForce.

      You never know. I remember all manner of small postscript files "to print" that were just cute ways of exploiting the processing power of the printer's cpu.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    7. Re:Hmmm... by Wavicle · · Score: 3, Interesting
      There is all manner of copyrighted content that may be jeopardized if you hack the Xbox. And that's what the DMCA is there for. To prevent you from doing something which may defeat the copyright protection measures of some device.

      For a real life version of this, check out aibohack.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    8. Re:Hmmm... by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest doing some research on the early days of the DeCSS persecution. A Norwegian national, younger than the age required to agree to a legally binding contract (and thus, not covered by EULAs, especially not ones he'd never read) who had written a program that was perfectly legal in Norway, was arrested. IIRC, he was held for several days and all computer equipment he or his family owned, including cel phones, was confiscated.

      Why? The MPAA told Norwegian law enforcement that he'd done something illegal.

      Now, while he got out of jail quite quickly and had a full apology made to him, what do you think would happen if Microsoft decided to go after an adult working on this kind of project? They can be at least as nasty as the MPAA, if not nastier - how many governments still run almost entirely on Microsoft software?

    9. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's try again to clear up a popular misconception of the DMCA .

      The DMCA does NOT outlaw reverse engineering, crypto research, et. al. Nope, not one bit. You are free to exercise any fair use rights provided to you under US law to your heart's content.

      What it DOES do is prevent you from exercising your 1st Amendment (again, under US Law) right to freedom of speech. You are not allowed to share with others the results of your efforts.

      This way the proponents of this tripe can legitimately say, "We haven't abridged your fair use rights at all!" They just neglect to point out that there is now an, IMHO, unreasonable barrier to exercising said rights. And you didn't really think you had any freedom of speech now, did you? Silly rabbit...

    10. Re:Hmmm... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      there are other countries... The DMCA does not apply to these countries

      The idiots behind the DMCA have already demostrated that they don't consider national borders to be an impediment to prosecution, but more importantly anyone reading this is most like either in the USA, or in a country covered by the EUCD. The EUCD is the European Copyright Directive. It has been passed by the EU and directs all member countries to pass their own DMCA in 2002. The EUCD has some pretty sounding instructions that the countries *MAY* include various exceptions for research and libraries etc. The problem is that these laws/technologies are based on restricting knowledge. Any effective exemptions destroy the security of the entire system. IF they include exemptions they MUST be worthless.
      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    11. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very quiet but generates a fair amount of heat. I'm semi-impressed. It's a hell of a machine but the selection of launch games is lacking. I picked up Halo and Project Gotham and enjoy them, but they're nothing special. Halo would be much more enjoyable on a PC, where I could use a mouse to control it. Using the analog stick to control your perspective isn't as fluid.

      The PS2 wins for now on the basis that it is comparable graphically and has a -far- better selection of games. It's been out longer of course, but that doesn't change the fact it's true. I enjoy my PS2 a lot and will probably enjoy my XBox, but for now my PS2 is first chair. Metal Gear Solid 2, Grand Theft Auto 3, Tony Hawk 3, the upcoming Final Fantasy X and XI, etc give the PS2 a huge advantage.

      Also, there appears to be no way to make use of the XBox's ethernet adapter as of yet. I am planning on connecting it to my LAN to see if it has an active DHCP client. If it does then I'll portscan it and see if there are any open ports or services. Wouldn't it be funny if it were running some stripped version of IIS that left the hard drive vulnerable? Talk about having millions of new places to hide information. Half the kids out there would never even notice 20% of their XBox hard drives being filled with secret MP3 porn. :D

    12. Re:Hmmm... by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      What is this 'Mp3 porn' you speak of? It sounds like the perfect blend...

      I can see how this happened.

      'You got your porn in my mp3!'
      'You got your mp3 in my porn!'

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    13. Re:Hmmm... by Tassach · · Score: 2
      reverse engineering such surely violates the DMCA


      DMCA only applies if you are trying to defeat a COPY PROTECTION method, nothing else. If you reverse-engineer an x-box so you can copy games freely, you're screwed. However, if you hack your x-box so you can use it as a router (for example), you are safe.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    14. Re:Hmmm... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      If your country has signed a treaty with the US, the DMCA will apply there as well.
      How do you think the US was able to have a boy in Norway(?) arrested?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Hmmm... by Tardigrade · · Score: 1

      What the heck are Norwegian authorities doing arresting a kid based on a US organizations say so? It sounds as if Norwegian law enforcement is screwed up.

    16. Re:Hmmm... by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      They did acknowledge that they'd screwed up, and apologize. But it just goes to show the clout that large business organizations can have when it comes to dealing with government.

  6. Who wants to place bets by dimator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who wants to place bets on how long it will be until someone hacks a way to play X-BOX games on your PC? (And who wants to bet that they'll run better on a non-staticly configured home system with the latest and greatest hardware?)

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    1. Re:Who wants to place bets by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who wants to place bets on how long it will be until someone hacks a way to play X-BOX games on your PC? (And who wants to bet that they'll run better on a non-staticly configured home system with the latest and greatest hardware?)

      As long as one part of the equation is static, you are probably right.

      Get this --

      All XBox systems will be identical. So, all games will be written to run on an Xbox. Now, we know that games for the Xbox will require at least a Pentium III 733, a GeForce 3, blah blah blah.

      Now, if we wanted to make a system that could play Xbox games, we would need to have at least those specs of course. Seeing as how the XBox uses DirectX, and a Windows 2000 type OS (Stripped down to be lightweight) it would probably be easy to put together a system based on a standard high-end PC using Windows 2000 or XP that lied to DirectX and pretended to be an XBox.

      As long as the "Liar" software, or Emulator if you will, lied well enough to LOOK to the software to actually BE an Xbox, everything should be fine.

      After all, the Xbox software KNOWS the one type of system it will be running on, right? That type and that one type alone?

      Everything will be good and perfect as long as a whole slew of mis-matched hardware types don't start popping up in various models of the XBox and various systems aren't trying to emulate such machines. It's then that the software will start to have a real piss-fit.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:Who wants to place bets by ConsumedByTV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless microsoft does some sort of hardware checking when each game starts as part of the SDK...

      --


      "Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
    3. Re:Who wants to place bets by Glonk · · Score: 5, Informative
      Actually, that'd be basically impossible to do without some serious emulation.


      Basically, what it comes down to is the Xbox has the shared memory architecture, and the PC does not. That is, there is no video card RAM on the Xbox, there is no system RAM on the Xbox, there is just 'RAM' on the Xbox. The GPU and CPU both have equal access to it. The PC, as you surely know, does not work like that.


      Then there's the fact that the Xbox games are all designed to run at Ring0 in the kernel, too...

    4. Re:Who wants to place bets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Probably looks in the registry for the string "MSDOS10.2".

    5. Re:Who wants to place bets by TheMoog · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yup MS have lots of nasty cryptographic tricks; the BIOS and system components are all encrypted and there is proprietary hardware on the mobo to decrypt the data.

      It ain't gonna be easy to crack, that's for sure.

    6. Re:Who wants to place bets by flynt · · Score: 1

      Now, we know that games for the Xbox will require at least a Pentium III 733, a GeForce 3, blah blah blah.

      I think you mean at most, if it was at least, nothing would run on the XBOX.

    7. Re:Who wants to place bets by frleong · · Score: 2

      Let us go back to emulate Xbox under MS-DOS!

      --
      ¦ ©® ±
    8. Re:Who wants to place bets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely it can't be much harder to crack than, say, hotmail or passport..?

    9. Re:Who wants to place bets by inburito · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah.. uh.. in normal pc's you only got one address space also.

      And whatabout that pc I built for my sister that has an integrated video driver on motherboard and uses system ram (to your specifications) for video memory..

      And whatabout nvidia's upcoming athlon chipset?
      Uh.. wait.. Isn't xbox already based on it..

      For anything more complicated than plain vga(etc) you're going to need specific drivers that interface with the o/s that then provides an api for developers to use. As long as someone can duplicate that api(which is going to be different than win32) everything is going to (more or less) work. It doesn't matter if memory is shared or not(heck, agp specs let you use system memory)..

    10. Re:Who wants to place bets by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      the only thing is who would spend that kind of money to build an Xbox emulator if you can get one for $299? ;-)

      show me a PC that has the same specs but costs less and I will buy a few from ya.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    11. Re:Who wants to place bets by haruharaharu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah.. uh.. in normal pc's you only got one address space also

      No, they have two (at least). A GeForce2/32MB card has 32MB of ram in its own address space. This may be mapped into the main physical address space, but it isn't necessarily done.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    12. Re:Who wants to place bets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see a game coded for UMA run on a PC's crappy AGP. That would result in a 10 fps game. And your video card better support the custom XBox vertex shader ucode. It's not a PC-in-a-box. Little does everyone know that the PIII CPU is slightly modified too.

    13. Re:Who wants to place bets by Myko · · Score: 1

      Doubtful that they'd have game devlopers lock down code to not run on specific hardware. They know the hardware types of the initial models, but to to rely on always having those specific parts is bad supply chain management. If there are equivalently functional parts by different manufacturers, and one is holding up production of the consoles, they might very well switch or mix the parts to keep production up.

      Remember, people won't buy games if they don't have the XBox to run them on...

    14. Re:Who wants to place bets by oman_ · · Score: 1


      I think you're going to have a bit of trouble with the unified memory architecture.

      It's not so much a pc as you would think.

      --
      Rats would be more funny if they could fart.
    15. Re:Who wants to place bets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How hard would it be to rip the ENCRYPTED data out of the system, and supply via a software emulation layer when asked? That way, no decryption would be necessary.

    16. Re:Who wants to place bets by TheMoog · · Score: 1

      Ripping the encrypted data probably isn't too hard; but getting the ripped BIOS off of the Xbox and working out how it gets decrypted by the peripheral bus on bootup would be the hard bit. If you can decipher the BIOS then I agree, yes, it's possible to emulate the encryption along with everything else an Xbox does. Getting that BIOS unencrypted will be the tricky part.

    17. Re:Who wants to place bets by gregorio · · Score: 0

      Who wants to place bets on how long it will be until someone hacks a way to play X-BOX games on your PC? (And who wants to bet that they'll run better on a non-staticly configured home system with the latest and greatest hardware?)

      Microsoft will love that: More people will be able to buy xbox licensed games, and they will not need to loose money with xbox consoles.

    18. Re:Who wants to place bets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And whatabout nvidia's upcoming athlon chipset?
      Uh.. wait.. Isn't xbox already based on it..


      To a degree, the nForce Athlon chipset is based on the technology used in the XBox. However, it's utilizing a GeForce2MX, rather than the GeForce3-based GPU in the XBox, and, of course, AMD rather than Intel for the processor (not sure if the on-board sound used in nForce is the same as that in XBox, though).

    19. Re:Who wants to place bets by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think Microsoft is probably less interested in preventing emulators than in preventing the system from being used as a cheap Linux system.
      I think we're all familiar with the peculier economics of the XBox-- Microsoft loses a good deal of money (~100 dollars, perhaps) on each XBox. They make the money on each game sold.

      So, there are three unorthodox possibilities
      Linux installed on Xbox: Microsoft and its cronies sell zero games. MS will hate this, particularly if (in your dreams) quality games come out for XBox/Linux. I'm not sure if any Linux for XBox will be suitable for much more than distributed computing-- in which case, a box with similar capabilities (without the fancy graphics) chipset could serve just as well.
      XBox emulator on a state of the art PC: probably hard to manage, but since it allows Microsoft to make money off gamesales without the loss-leading XBox hardware, MS might encourage this-- if and only if the quality was high enough to not reflect poorly of genuine X-Box platforms.
      Reverse Engineering of game development kit:
      No more royalties to Microsoft...
      Microsoft will throw a hissy fit, and release the lawyers.

    20. Re:Who wants to place bets by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      I think you mean at most, if it was at least, nothing would run on the XBOX.

      I think the original statement was correct. "At least".

      You have to allow some additional horsepower for the overhead involved in the "emulation" (if that's what it takes).

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    21. Re:Who wants to place bets by snoozer20001 · · Score: 1

      Now this just made me consider something. Is it really neccesarry to "install" games on your PC? You know that the games on the X-Box are going to be just as complex, if not in gameplay at least in code. So why do we have to go through DLL hell on our PC's and take up a gig of HD space for one game?

      All of you out there that don't break the copy protection on your games have to keep the media in the tray anyway, so why not just put the CD/DVD in the tray and have it AutoLoad? Bang, no problems. And I don't have to buy a bigger hard drive!

      And yes, I realize you would still use some space for game saves, new levels, etc... But that's not the point.

      --
      This space available at a low monthly rate...
    22. Re:Who wants to place bets by inburito · · Score: 2

      Nope! x86 architecture has exactly one address space. If you're talking about putting that geforce of yours into ppc or alpha then the address spaces might be physically different(not sure).

      In x86, however, everything resides in one address space and you can access everything by it's address directly(highly unportable). That Geforce is going to get its 32mb(probably more) slice somewhere in the common space.

      Yes.. I've written a driver for a videocard before..

      For a linux side of the things look at address translation explanation by linus here. Specifically the part about pci-memory and the exception for x86.

  7. So, my thoughts are as follows... by haxor.dk · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1) The components look awfully cramped. But that's not really surprising considering that it's essentially a PC crammed into a console box - size matters.

    2) While it should work at standard operating parameters (i.e. not overclocked), I think the lack of proper ventilation (as a result of pt. 1, see above) could halt any overclocking efforts.

    3) I wonder how much noise the box will make after 3 months woth of dust and use... TWO fans (if not 3?) is awfully muich for a console - in my experience.

    4) It's Microsoft... ewww. Yes, that's my blanat bias.

    - Peter

    1. Re:So, my thoughts are as follows... by themks · · Score: 1

      >1) The components look awfully cramped. But that's not really surprising considering that it's essentially a PC crammed into a console box - size matters. Did you never open a Compaq/HP PC (a DeskPro, i.e.)? ;) >3) I wonder how much noise the box will make after 3 months woth of dust and use... TWO fans (if not 3?) is awfully muich for a console - in my experience. In my experience too; it should be like to have a vacuum cleaner on your tv set... -=|MkS=-

    2. Re:So, my thoughts are as follows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought they were crammed into a modified pc case with the form factors and all?

  8. so what does the price tally to by blonde+rser · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now that we can get our hands on the parts and see what they are has anyone summed up their street value and compared that to the unit price. Next time I put a system together would it be worth it to pick up an Xbox strictly for cannibal purposes?

    1. Re:so what does the price tally to by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      The sum of the components are surely more costly than the price of the unit itself, considering MS is losing money on them, and will continue to do so until about 2005. Estimates of Microsoft's cost to build each unit have ranged from $320 to $400, but those are probably wholesale prices anyways not retail.

    2. Re:so what does the price tally to by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      It looks like you probably could not cannibalize much besides the hard drive and DVD. The processor may be slotted and come off. Everything else looks to be built onto the motherboard.

      If you were to try and build a system yourself that was equal to the Xbox, it would cost you a bit more than the Xbox. That's one of the reasons the Xbox has some appeal as a server commodity box. A 16 node cluster of Xboxen costs $300*16 = 4800. Not bad at all, and they're all linked via a 100Mb ethernet backbone.

      This of course assumes you could buy an Xbox without having to buy 4 games and a controller for just $250 more.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    3. Re:so what does the price tally to by MisterPo · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you Blonde, but most of the gubbins of the X-Box are part of the onboard chipset. Probably all you can take from it are the slow DVD, small HD and any fans that aren't screwed down :(

      Still nice idea though. More interestingly it *cant* be that long till someone figures out how to access the OS via some sort of boot device (CD, USB memory key etc) and start to hack at it.

      Regards,

      Po

    4. Re:so what does the price tally to by Elbereth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, I don't think you can really duplicate this system exactly, since some parts of the system are custom jobs (ie, an Intel CPU with an nVidia chipset). However, if you wanted to make a comparable system:

      Case: $30 (cheapo mATX) to $100 (Antec ATX)
      Motherboard: $50 (cheap mATX) to $150 (Asus ATX)
      750MHz CPU: $40 (OEM) to $65 (Retail)
      128MB RAM: $10 (OEM) to $25 (Retail)
      Good AGP card: $75 (Radeon LE) to $350 (GeForce3)
      20GB hard drive: $60 (OEM) to $100 (Retail)
      DVD-ROM: $50 (OEM) to $100 (Retail)
      Sound Card: $35 (OEM) to $100 (Retail)

      Cables, floppy, keyboard, mouse, and other misc components would add another $50 if you didn't already have them.

      Altogether, probably $400-500 with OEM parts. IMHO, this would kick the ass of the X-Box, but you'd have to spend more money for it.

    5. Re:so what does the price tally to by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 1
      Hmmm.... Yesterday I had seen a link about PS3 production timeline being altered. Normally the lifetime of a console is about 5 years (as it was for the PSX), but SONY now wants the next generation of console in consumers homes in 2003, effectivly shortening the expected lifespan by 2 years. If so then M$ will be in production of the PS3's competetor (which they no doubt will have) before they see any profit from the XBOX.

      Is this a sound business practice? Or am I mising some information that would make this whole "hey, lets not make *any* money on this console, but get our consumer base nice and wide for the XBOX2" make sense?

      --

    6. Re:so what does the price tally to by jerrytcow · · Score: 1

      750MHz CPU: $40 (OEM) to $65 (Retail)

      Celeron or Duron, maybe. The cheapest p3 750 (I believe the XBox has a 733 which will cost a bit more because it runs on a 133 MHz bus) is just over $100 now, and that's for the OEM version which will only have a 3 month warrantee. The retail with a 3 yr. warrantee are up to $50 more.

    7. Re:so what does the price tally to by crashcheval · · Score: 1

      It will be really interesting if the Xbox lives up to its own pricing hype. The Wired's recent article said that Microsoft wants to be selling the units for about $100.00 in a year or so. At that point (if it is ever reached), there should be a lot of incentive to buy the units for hacking purposes. Right now, you can build an equivalent computer for about the same price as the Xbox.

    8. Re:so what does the price tally to by mdwebster · · Score: 1

      Athlon t-bird 750 is $50 + s&h (probably another $10-$15) OEM. Duron 750 is $33, less than $50 with s&h. Duron 950 should run pretty close if not better than a P3-750 and it's $48 + s&h. P3's are still overpriced. Athlon 1.33 / 266 fsb are around $100 w/ s&h

    9. Re:so what does the price tally to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: the Matsonic MS8127C mainboard includes a -very good- audio chipset, fully supported under Linux.
      IMO a great low cost and good quality piece of hardware.

    10. Re:so what does the price tally to by uslinux.net · · Score: 1
      Altogether, probably $400-500 with OEM parts. IMHO, this would kick the ass of the X-Box, but you'd have to spend more money for it.



      I'm not so sure this is true. Despite the fact that the majority of the hardware is based on x86 architecture, there are a number of differences, including the shared system/video memory architecture. A "comparable" Intel system won't perfom nearly as well - x86 hardware is designed to perform every task in a mediocre fashion instead of performing a few, specialized tasks very well. The X-box probably would do a TERRIBLE job of running MS Office, but it does a much better job of playing games.


      In addition, I think there are several benefits of a console system (though I desperately despise both Microsoft and the X-box):

      • Standard hardware architecture for companies to design software - none of this "your Riva128 is too slow, and your GeForce2 is incompatible without a drive update, but the original GeForce or Matrox G400 will work..." Game companies like developing for consoles because there is a standard system, and they KNOW how their product will perform.
      • Decent game controllers - something normally not available for the PC.
      • The ability for multiple people to easily play together on a decent size "monitor" (TV).


      I fully agree that a real computer seems to be a better investment than the X-box, but if all you're doing is playing games, a console like this really is better suited to the task.

    11. Re:so what does the price tally to by GusSchultz · · Score: 1

      Celeron 733 is $39 from Accubyte.

    12. Re:so what does the price tally to by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I was going by the prices of a Duron or Celeron of a faster speed, which is roughly comparable to a Pentium III. Anyways, most gamers would overclock a 750 MHz chip to over 1GHz.

      I know that everyone is drooling over the X-Box, but even with the technical specs in front of me, I have a difficult time being impressed with it.

      It's just another proprietary, integrated PC. Compaq, Packard Bell, and lots of other PC manufacturers churned out those pieces of crap for years. Look at where Compaq and there ilk are now... dead.

      Integrated PCs never were stable in the past, and I don't think they'll start being stable any time in the future. If every Packard Bell or Compaq is built the same way as the 10,000 previous to it, how come they crash all the time?

    13. Re:so what does the price tally to by Strog · · Score: 1
      Integrated PCs never were stable in the past, and I don't think they'll start being stable any time in the future.

      This is generally true but how many of those cheap PC's had the amount of development and testing the Xbox has had?

      They were built as cheaply and quickly as possible. The Xbox hardware has a good chance at being stable. We will have to see about the OS though.

  9. Wow... looky here. by SynKKnyS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't that look like a normal DVD-ROM and a normal harddisk? That leaves a lot of possibilities.

    You can upgrade the DVD-ROM drive and make load times faster.
    You can upgrade the harddisk drive when it gets full.
    Whatever copy-protection mechanism the XBox has can be broken easier since it uses standard PC parts.
    The possibilites go on and on...

    Looks like a hacker's picnic to me. =) Also, look how much room is in that thing. They could of at least added a PCMCIA slot or something.

    1. Re:Wow... looky here. by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      They have a USB port, although microsoft calls them 'not quite standard'. Not sure what that means yet. They also have a 100Mb ethernet port. But, yeah it doesn't look like there is so much as an ISA slot in there.

      Still, I plan to pick one up as soon as I can get it without paying $200 extra for a "value" pack. It looks like a hacker's dream.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    2. Re:Wow... looky here. by Lozzer · · Score: 1

      I vaguely recall another /.er saying that the USB modifications were to address the different physical situation that a console would be in compared to computer. Something along the lines of the joystick cable not falling out when some drunkard falls over the cable...

      --
      Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
    3. Re:Wow... looky here. by iainl · · Score: 1

      If memory serves, the 'not quite standard' ports are just a different shape for the connection, so they (1) don't fall out as easy, and (2) mean Microsoft can make you buy a non-standard joystick, wheel, mouse, keyboard etc rather than off-the-shelf PC bits.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    4. Re:Wow... looky here. by Wavicle · · Score: 2

      Hey, if that's it, that's good news. I imagine many hackers (myself included) aren't intimidated by a little soldering job to get a "standard" USB port. Heck, I bet I could hijack +5v and Gnd off the Xbox's power supply and wire them directly to a small usb hub I've managed to fit in there somewhere poking out the box to give me 4 standard USB ports. I doubt I could connect 4 500mA devices though :)

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    5. Re:Wow... looky here. by CaseyB · · Score: 2

      The one "real" reason is (3) they're driving a higher voltage through their usb, to support rumble packs and force feedback devices.

    6. Re:Wow... looky here. by interiot · · Score: 2

      The software is a bit different too... enumeration is simpler or something. It won't support standard USB devices without writing a lot of extra code. (see here, search for "usb-like")

    7. Re:Wow... looky here. by zeno_2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it had something to do with the power going thru the usb ports, I THINK it was juiced up you could say, to provide better support for force feedback joysticks or something like that.

      It was a while ago I was reading about it though so it may have just been a fragment of info from something else I was thinking of.

      Im curious to know if you can use a keyboard/mouse with this, one that is made for a pc (similar to how you can use them on ps2), or if you are going to have to buy XBOX(TM) only stuff. From what I can remember, the usb ports on the front for the controllers were a little bit different size then a standard usb port, but only someone who has one is going to be able to tell us.

      I myself am going to wait for the gamecube. For only 199 bucks, its quite a bargain, and nintendo usually has very solid 1rst party games, and with the change to a cd type of format, I hope more 3rd party developers jump on board, I hear that one of the main things they tried to do when making the gamecube was to make it easy on developers when making games.

      But.. halo is looking mighty tempting =)

    8. Re:Wow... looky here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall that one of the X-box developers said that the major difference between USB and the X-box USB was the shape of the plug. Of course, the shape of the plug may be different in order to show users that standard USB devices won't work on an X-box. I can imagine all manner of annoying support calls on something like that.

    9. Re:Wow... looky here. by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Do what I did - I bought one at Target on my way to work (only had to wait around for like 30 min - this was in Beaverton OR) - I signed up for the target card got 10% off so the thing so far only cost me 270$ and they will let you buy one without any software.

    10. Re:Wow... looky here. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      They have a USB port, although microsoft calls them 'not quite standard'. Not sure what that means yet.
      Well, it sure means it has been embraced & extended , duh? !!!
    11. Re:Wow... looky here. by Magila · · Score: 1

      I would think they'd want to the cabe to come out if, say, someone trips over it, otherwise it would pull the entire unit off the self. Then it's bye bye hard drive.

  10. ... and the it all begins by muffen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wasn't suprised by this article. I don't understand how Microsoft can think that it is a good idea to have "normal" PC hardware in the Xbox. I think there must be millions of people out there who have in-depth knowledge about the PC hardware. This means that it is not going to take long before we start seeing hacked versions of the Xbox and hardware that can be connected to it that is not released by Microsoft.

    I don't know what the copy protection looks like on the Xbox (if anyone knows anything about it... please post it), but I think it will be bypassed very shortly.

    I remember the playstation, it took almost a year to get the first chip. The reason was that this was the first console where you needed to do a hardware modification in order to play pirated games combined with the fact that it was NOT standard PC hardware inside it.
    With the Xbox, one don't have to worry about any of these things

    On the box it said supported operating systems was Windows 95 or better... I therefore asumed Linux was supported

    1. Re:... and the it all begins by DarkZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't understand how Microsoft can think that it is a good idea to have "normal" PC hardware in the Xbox. I think there must be millions of people out there who have in-depth knowledge about the PC hardware.

      Yeah, and some of those millions of people are game developers, and that's why it's a good idea. Games can be ported from the X-Box to the PC or from the PC to the X-Box with incredible ease, which means that the X-Box can have a lot of cheap games thrown onto it to quickly develop a library and developers will be attracted to it because they'll be able to port their X-Box game to a completely different platform with different players very easily, thus bumping their profits up 25-50% off a single game.

      As far as piracy goes, I believe Microsoft is counting on the fact that DVD drives are ridiculously expensive. If they're really planning on chucking the X-Box in favor of a second console within only a couple years, which is a pervasive rumor that supposedly has some legitimacy to it, then that's a really good bet. If not, then the X-Box will be relatively free of piracy for about as logn as the PlayStation was, i.e. one to three years.

    2. Re:... and the it all begins by Glonk · · Score: 1
      I wasn't suprised by this article. I don't understand how Microsoft can think that it is a good idea to have "normal" PC hardware in the Xbox. I think there must be millions of people out there who have in-depth knowledge about the PC hardware. This means that it is not going to take long before we start seeing hacked versions of the Xbox and hardware that can be connected to it that is not released by Microsoft.
      Erm...if you were to make a game console in 14 months, would you use standard parts you can get easily and wholesale or would you piss around making your own custom parts, when the wholesale ones are bound to be cheaper and easier and faster to use?

      Really, why don't we start talking about how the Gamecube uses a PPC chip, or how some consoles use RDRAM instead of their own brand...

    3. Re:... and the it all begins by MadMirko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't understand how Microsoft can think that it is a good idea to have "normal" PC hardware in the Xbox.

      Simple: MS wants the XBox to become as popular as possible. If it can be canibalized, hacked, tweaked, improved, whatever, it will become a beloved toy of the cool hacker type guys. Everyone wants to be a cool hacker type guy, so everyone will want a XBox.

      In an interview with the German magazine "Focus", a MS representative explained that the XBox wasn't viewed as a cash cow (like Windows), but rather as a means to get more popular.

    4. Re:... and the it all begins by Elbereth · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You're talking like a PC and an X-Box are two different things. The X-Box is simply a custom PC motherboard with a custom PC chipset. Does this make it any less of a PC? I think not, but this is just my opinion.

      Why not just put together your own "X-Box"? Get a standard MicroATX or FlexATX motherboard (1 to 3 PCI slots, 0 to 1 AGP slots, 1 to 3 DIMM slots), stick in a 2.5" laptop EIDE hard drive and 2.5" slimline DVD-ROM, and you're mostly set. You need to figure out how to get decent graphics out of a motherboard that probably has an integrated graphics chip (S3 Savage4, SiS 5xx or 6xx, ATI Mach64 or Mach128, or generic crapola)... but consider this: the most popular games right now are not first person shooters. The most popular games right now are Diablo II, The Sims, Civ III, etc. These games do NOT require anything better than a crappy ATI Mach64 chip (ie, Rage Pro).

      Once you've got something running at 900 MHz (have you seen anything slower sold online lately?), a 20GB hard drive (again.. ever seen anything smaller sold online?), and an adequate graphics card (or even a next-gen graphics card like the GeForce3 or new Radeon All-In-Wonder), you can laugh at that silly X-Box.

      Advantages of the Flex-ATX system
      1. I'm using a standard chipset, probably from Intel, SiS, or AMD (no, not VIA, because VIA sucks). My chipset is well-supported and proven.
      2. I'm using quality components and not skimping on the power supply, RAM, or CPU fan. Again, my Flex-ATX system is more stable.
      3. I know the hardware and diagnose problems easily. I know everything about Asus motherboards by now, after using them for so long. Most importantly, I know their quirks.

      Disadvantages of the Flex-ATX system
      1. It does suffer from using "random", commodity PC hardware, rather than a uniform system (but, then again, I hate every Compaq I see because of their uniformity in suckitude).
      2. It costs a little more to build
      3. There's no billion dollar ad campaign behind the F-Box.
      4. It's not exciting to hack.

      I know, I know... I'm a spoilsport, too cynical, I "just don't get it", etc. I've heard all the flames before, but I haven't heard a good, rational argument that would change my mind.
    5. Re:... and the it all begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah, ms is spending that much money catering to such a niche market, you tool. how many dorks even bothered to 'hack' their dreamcast (other than using the boot disc to boot copies)?

      if ms is really trying to be more 'popular' - their method won't be watching hackers hack the xbox in every way, but instead their method will be trying to bring over some of the titles that the 'playstation generation' grew up on to their do-it-all console. after all the new console release frenzy (where dumbasses spend $500 on bundles of garbage they don't really want just so they can tell their unpopular friends they have an xbox - oh maybe to play halo too), games will sell the system.

    6. Re:... and the it all begins by linzeal · · Score: 1
      I believe Microsoft is counting on the fact that DVD drives are ridiculously expensive.

      um are you talking about the Various DVD-R Drives selling for 350+ because I can walk into a Fry's and pick up a DVD Rom for 50 bucks and even cheaper online.

    7. Re:... and the it all begins by DarkZero · · Score: 1
      Yeah, you can laugh at that "silly X-Box" as you gaze upon your $700+ PC that barely outruns the X-Box in computing power, and yet... does not play X-Box games.

      A lot of people here keep comparing that X-Box to home-built PCs, and saying how you can "make your own X-Box". One wonders, though... why would you? Oh, and you also forgot that in order to play X-Box games (if you wanted to) on that little computer, you'd need an emulator, which would mean that you'd need a lot more power than there is in that PC. To emulate the X-Box's architecture with accurate emulation, I'd say you'd need at least a 1-1.2GHz machine with about 256MB of RAM.

    8. Re:... and the it all begins by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      I think $700 is a little steep. I agree it would cost more, but $700 would get you one sweet machine today. You could probably even throw in a 19" monitor for that much money.

      Anyways, why would I want to play X-Box games, when the X-Box is just a PC with integrated hardware? I can play the very same games on my PC.

      Can you explain to me why I'd want to use an emulator to play a game I already own?

    9. Re:... and the it all begins by TheMoog · · Score: 3, Informative
      I don't know what the copy protection looks like on the Xbox (if anyone knows anything about it... please post it), but I think it will be bypassed very shortly.

      Can't say much (under NDA here) but the copy protection system is several steps above and beyond anything currently out there, drawing from various hardware facilities and strong cryptography with all code and data on the DVD and HD being signed/crypted.

      If I were a betting man I'd bet against the protection being broken in the next year or so - it really is that much of a leap above the usual PS-style damaged block/weak crypto system.

    10. Re:... and the it all begins by Puppe · · Score: 1

      > 2.5" slimline DVD-ROM

      Isn't that a bit small for a DVD disc? Aren't they atleast > 4"?

    11. Re:... and the it all begins by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      if ms is really trying to be more 'popular' - their method won't be watching hackers hack the xbox in every way, but instead their method will be trying to bring over some of the titles that the 'playstation generation' grew up on to their do-it-all console.

      Actually, I think Microsoft is more interested in maintaining market dominance in terms of OS's and software licensing. Having a popular, hackable game box is a great way of affecting this. Keeps MS planted in the public awareness.

      But the coup de grace is that it focuses all the best and brightest minds in programming into development for a Microsoft chassis and OS, which will significantly polarize the direction of the content industry for the next few years. For the most part, I'd certainly believe the MS representative quoted; --the xbox is primarily a piece of aggressive advertising and market manipulation. Quite a formidable play, if you ask me.


      -Fantastic Lad

    12. Re:... and the it all begins by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      I think maybe he meant dvdrw drives, they are counting on the fact that people aren't going to pirate xbox games because a dvdrw drive is too expensive..

    13. Re:... and the it all begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO that's not an argument. I don't know how much of the Win32 API is shared with 'normal' PC windows, but AFAIK games don't use much of it anyways (almost only DirectX). Since the Win32 API & DirectX abstract from the hardware, the software should not care much about the CPU/Bus/Vide etc. it is working on.

      Probably the only thing needed to port standard C++ from the PC to an XBox with is cross-compiler and some ASM tweaking (should be possible with a cross-assembler maybe?).

    14. Re:... and the it all begins by foghorn19 · · Score: 1
      [I]t is not going to take long before we start seeing hacked versions of the Xbox and hardware that can be connected to it that is not released by Microsoft.

      That is precisely the idea, general. That is precisely the idea.

      Line shamelessly copied from "Dr. Strangelove")

    15. Re:... and the it all begins by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      MS wants the XBox to become as popular as possible.

      I am sceptical about that. Everything I've heard suggests MS wants XBox software licensed by Microsoft to become as popular as possible. If the XBox becomes open and developers become free to use the XBox without MS getting a cut of the software sales, MS will lose money.

      Deliberate incompatabilty is the only way MS can survive.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    16. Re:... and the it all begins by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Does this make it any less of a PC? I think not, but this is just my opinion.

      Any box that is wired to require a vendor tax and approval on software is not an open system and not a Personal Computer by definition. Personal Media and Game Terminal maybe.

      I thing that it's only a a matter of a year or two before you could BYOB settop game box with decent 3D and TV out using standard parts for close to $300. (YES the PC market is that bad!).

      A $300 PC AT-compatible gamebox might not run with the fastest setups, but for some reason I have a feeling that most upcoming PC games will be targetting a lowest common demoninator of ... umm .. a GF3 and PIII-733.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    17. Re:... and the it all begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      (cough) Astroturf! (cough)

    18. Re:... and the it all begins by bmoyles · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true non-console gamer.
      People don't play consoles for the PC ports, they play them for the console exclusives.

    19. Re:... and the it all begins by GusSchultz · · Score: 1

      You can't play Halo on your PC yet - it's only one game but I'd bet they'll have some other good exclusive games you won't be able to play on your PC for a while

    20. Re:... and the it all begins by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Well, I have a Playstation and Sega Genesis. I owned a Commodore 64 before you were born.

    21. Re:... and the it all begins by bmoyles · · Score: 1

      Well, this isn't a weiner length contest, but I still have my Odyssey II, 2600, 5200, and 7800. Sold the Colecovision, INTVI and INTVII to a friend with games, and have owned pretty much every console since the NES save for the Neo Geo and 3D0, but played both extensively.
      Regardless of that, consoles offer much the PC can't and won't, and vice versa. If you can't think of any reason to own a console, then why even bother asking, since you've made your mind up?

    22. Re:... and the it all begins by seann · · Score: 1

      why would you make console exclusives for a system thats ment to be ultra portable between windows and xbox

      wait

      microsoft likes money

      wait

      they get money either way

      ..

      answer original question please.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    23. Re:... and the it all begins by bmoyles · · Score: 1

      That's their problem. MS has touted this as the PC port machine, and no one wants to play PC ports on a console, where often the don't translate well (I can't imagine playing console games with that Mack truck of a controller, let alone a FPS). It's got lackluster support, lackluster exclusives, no killer app (the sucker's got 10/100 ethernet on it, but what exploits that?)...

    24. Re:... and the it all begins by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 1
      People don't play consoles for the PC ports, they play them for the console exclusives.
      Then why are you getting an X-Box?

      Every title made for the X-Box will be "ported" to the PC in a few short months (time dictated by how much they want to tick off MS). "Console exclusives" only apply to other consoles. Remember, if you buy an X-Box, you're not buying a console. You're buying a PC.

      The only upside to purchasing an X-Box is that, if you don't buy any games, you cause Microsoft to lose a couple hundred dollars. A new BIOS should be out shortly that lets it boot off the HD, after that all it takes is linux drivers for the video/NIC (according to friends of friends, working drivers are already available), and... bam... a non-expandable PC with 64MB and a UMA chipset.

      Sounds really appetizing, mmmmyeah... but, hey, at least Microsoft loses money.
      --

      Moof!

    25. Re:... and the it all begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To emulate the X-Box's architecture with accurate emulation, I'd say you'd need at least a 1-1.2GHz machine
      Yes, but then again, you rode the "special" bus to school.

      An X-Box is just a PC. Nothing more. It's got a custom BIOS, a UMA chipset, but... it's still just a PC.

      Rewrite the BIOS (allow it to boot off HD), voila, it's a PC. Write drivers, voila, run linux.

      There's no "emulation" going on here. If you have a fast enough PC, DVD-ROM drive, a fast enough video card, an equivalent sound chipset, the appropriate API-to-API translations, and (drumroll please) the ability to read their custom file system (protected by the DCMA, of course, and the only company that's involved in more lawsuits than Apple is MS) - you 'll be able to play X-Box titles on a PC. That's "all" you need.

      Yes, it's a tall order. But it's certainly within the realm of possibility. I personally know one guy who converted his (cough) prerelease (cough) XBox into a Linux system.
    26. Re:... and the it all begins by bmoyles · · Score: 1

      I'm not getting a X-Box. I played it at E3 and was wholly unimpressed.
      Regardless of that, a statement like "every title made for the X-Box will be ported to the PC..." is a troll. Plain and simple.
      Plus, you can boot Linux off a Dreamcast. So I guess that's another non-expandable PC, right? Oh, and Sony's Linux project in Japan is out to make the PS2 a non-expandable PC, right?
      Trust me, I'm no Microsoft supporter, and I'm not sold on the X-Box at all. I just have a real problem with uninformed trolling posts :)

  11. Overclocking a game console ?? by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Whoaaa, your new ultra-fast shoot'em up game really kicks ass !"

    "Well, er, actually it's a port of Super Mario Bros I"

    Thomas Miconi

  12. Pictures, eh? by KILNA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't meant to be your usual cynical "What's this story doing here?" flame, but half the pictures are a guy with a screwdriver. And the pictures that are of something I want to look at are just too small to be informative. It appears to be a PC in a console cabinet, for what its worth. There are some chips, but you can't read the writing. There isn't even commentary except for useless captions like "Righty-tighty, lefty-loosey" So...

    What's this story doing here?

    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
    1. Re:Pictures, eh? by Dogmatix+Man · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't know about you, but I found 'Righty-tighty, lefty-loosey' quite amusing...

      --
      Bugger that for a game of soldiers!
    2. Re:Pictures, eh? by James+Foster · · Score: 1

      So it's kinda like a game where the game focuses on graphics (pictures) and ends up with a shitty story (captions)... and then it has shitty graphics anyway. Perfect recipe for a shitty game (article)!!

    3. Re:Pictures, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. What is this? Tech TV is pretty awful but this is prety bad.

    4. Re:Pictures, eh? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      What's this story doing here?

      I'd guess that the story was posted as "in" to get a thread on xbox hacking and chopping-up started, rather than as an article that's of particular interest on its own.

      That seems to have worked rather well. I might not have gotten much out of the linked article, but the thread is extremely interesting.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    5. Re:Pictures, eh? by bolhuijo · · Score: 1

      The extra pictures of the guy are there to display more ad banners in that popup window.

  13. *Yawn* by Overcoat · · Score: 1

    So MSFT's big killer app truns out to be a stripped-down PC. What a letdown. The PS2 is a superior console, since it was designed (hardware-wise) specifically as a gaming system. It's not just a computational device hacked up to turn it into a console. Plus it runs Linux (Somebody should port Linux to the Xbox. That would be a 1337 hack).

    1. Re:*Yawn* by Glonk · · Score: 1

      The 'stripped down PC' uses a shared memory architecture that you won't find on a modern PC.
      <p>
      Also runs all code at Ring0.
      <p>
      And I think it's quite clear that the Xbox was designed (hardware-wise) specifically as a gaming system. I mean, you could argue that the hard drive wasn't designed for it, but I doubt you're that desperate.
      <p>
      And here's a newsflash for you: Do you know what gaming consoles are? They're computational devices hacked down to run only games. What's new with the Xbox is they use readily accessable parts to increase availability. And hey, when it comes down to it, the Xbox blows away the PS2 with graphical prowess. Honestly and truly.

    2. Re:*Yawn* by Saint+Mitchell · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think it will take much hacking. Nvidia chip set, Intel CPU, Segate HD. If CD Boot isn't disabled you can probably take the HD out, put your own in and install linux. I'm half tempted to buy one just so I can see....but I vowed I would never own on, so I'll have to let somone else try it.

    3. Re:*Yawn* by Rouven · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is NOT a regular PC. CPU, chipset and GeForce3 are modified for console purposes, first and foremost they share the entire 64 megs memory of the box. So, no AGP etc. necessary.
      As for copy protection, it's a DVD-9 drive, which consumer-level DVD writers can't do (yet).

    4. Re:*Yawn* by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Unless it does a CRC on the DVD bios when it boots and I'm sure it can be hacked not too you can throw in a new DVD rom problem solved.

    5. Re:*Yawn* by Wavicle · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The 'stripped down PC' uses a shared memory architecture that you won't find on a modern PC.

      In this case that's a function of the operating system kernel.

      Also runs all code at Ring0.

      Also a function of the kernel.

      And I think it's quite clear that the Xbox was designed (hardware-wise) specifically as a gaming system.

      I disagree. Games don't need a hard drive, a dvd drive, USB port, or ethernet port. Although it is marketed as just a games box, it's pretty clear that it is also intended to serve tasks such as a DVD player, broadband WebTV (and all that goes with it), Personal Info Manager (Outlook Xbox), etc.. Microsoft hinted that they would discourage xbox usb peripherals from being developed... I'm betting within 18 months you'll see an internet access pack for the Xbox that includes a usb hub, usb keyboard and usb mouse.

      I think the Xbox could become what CD32 and CDI were trying to become.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    6. Re:*Yawn* by iomud · · Score: 2
      I'm betting within 18 months you'll see an internet access pack for the Xbox that includes a usb hub, usb keyboard and usb mouse.

      It has onboard ethernet, no need for all that usb nonsense other than for alternate controler devices. I think a hard drive is not a bad idea at all for a game machine instead of a stack of memory cards ala playstation, also you open up the versatility of the machine greatly with storage options combined with the elimination of many of those blasted loading screens is what I'm thinking.

    7. Re:*Yawn* by jcupitt65 · · Score: 1

      The 'stripped down PC' uses a shared memory architecture that you won't find on a modern PC.

      In this case that's a function of the operating system kernel.


      AFAIK it's hardware. GPU and CPU share the memory. Not like a PC at all.

    8. Re:*Yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>The 'stripped down PC' uses a shared memory architecture that you won't find on a modern PC.
      >>In this case that's a function of the operating system kernel.

      Not true. That feature has little to do with NT. It's a hardware issue.
      Obviously the xbox was necessarily going to have flat unified memory shared by the x86 and the graphic&sound coprocessors, like the AMIGA, like professional workstations, and consoles.
      Definitely nothing to do with PC's bottlenecks.
      xbox is simply an NT5.1 real Workstation (not pc) that MS should have pushed years before, instead of going on with "pcs".

      I would even say that xbox is *the* MS Platform. In that view, pcs with NT could be seen as just a cheap, temporary, implementation of the Platform, a bit like w95/98/ME was a cheap, temporary, implementation of win32, to be replaced by real NTs on 25th oct 2001.

      >> Also runs all code at Ring0.
      >> Also a function of the kernel.

      Correct, except that I just don't believe applications (call them "games" for now) run at ring 0 .

    9. Re:*Yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PS2 is a superior console, since it was designed (hardware-wise) specifically as a gaming system.

      That's exactly why the PS2 has USB ports, iLink ports, a PCMCIA slot, a hard disk drive addon, and an ethernet addon.

    10. Re:*Yawn* by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      Not true. That feature has little to do with NT. It's a hardware issue.

      That's why I said "in this case".

      Most "onboard video" motherboards and laptop video also fit into this case, but the kernel sets up a virtual mapping so you can't just plug in a physical memory address into a mov instruction and have it show up on the screen. In this case the only reason you don't see the "shared memory architecture" on a modern PC is because the CPU's MMU is set up such that you don't.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    11. Re:*Yawn* by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      indeed it's hardware.
      From DDJ (http://www.ddj.com/documents/s=882/ddj0008a/)- I quote *ahem*:
      "That leaves one potential bottleneck, and it's a big one -- memory bandwidth. Xbox has a unified memory architecture (UMA), whereby the GPU and CPU share a single memory space, with memory control provided by the GPU. This is in marked contrast to the separate memories used for high-performance 3D in PCs. UMA has a significant advantage in that it allows the CPU, DVD and disk controllers, and GPU to access common data without copying; for example, models and textures can be streamed off the DVD into memory and used directly by the GPU. However, the history of UMA is spotty; witness IBM's PCjr UMA, which stopped the CPU virtually dead in its tracks by allotting two out of every three memory cycles to graphics. Not surprisingly, this is the aspect of Xbox that has aroused the greatest degree of public skepticism, so the accompanying text box entitled "Xbox Memory Bandwidth" discusses Xbox's memory bandwidth in high-end scenarios. The short version of the bandwidth story is that while there are scenarios in which Xbox could run out of bandwidth, there should be more than enough for most cases, particularly those that leverage the GPU's programmable pipeline. Under virtually any set of assumptions, Xbox has adequate memory bandwidth to handle 50 Mtris/sec. in real-world use, and usually plenty to hit the pipeline limits of the chip."

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    12. Re:*Yawn* by TheMoog · · Score: 2, Informative
      In this case the only reason you don't see the "shared memory architecture" on a modern PC is because the CPU's MMU is set up such that you don't.


      That simply isn't true - the CPU has no direct access to the RAM on a graphics card. Period. Instead it must use memory mapped IO to set up DMA transfers to and from the graphics card's RAM, or poke each byte individually over the bus - very unlike the direct cache-line level access it has to its own RAM chips.

      Xbox on the other hand has all of the RAM available to both devices; they share access to the same physical RAM - PCs have two physically distinct RAM banks; one on the graphics card and one on the motherboard.

      Of course there is AGP but this is a way for the graphics card to read and write to a limited subset of the mainboard's RAM - and very slowly at that, causing all sorts of contention issues. At no point can the processor or its MMU access the memory on the graphics card directly.

    13. Re:*Yawn* by yobtah · · Score: 1

      Where did you get that quote? That's not what the original post said. It said "The PS2 is a superior console, since it was designed (hardware-wise) specifically as a gaming system", NOT something about Xbox being designed as a gaming system.

    14. Re:*Yawn* by psamuels · · Score: 1
      The 'stripped down PC' uses a shared memory architecture that you won't find on a modern PC.

      Ever heard of the Intel i740 and i810 graphics chips? (i810 motherboards are only 2 or 3 years old - what I would call a "modern PC".)

      The "shared memory architecture" sounds to me a lot like what Intel did. Nobody liked the i740 in particular because the CPU and GPU would vie for memory bandwidth and sometimes you'd see artifacts on your screen (aka frame buffer) when the CPU was hogging the bandwidth.

      Perhaps MS/NV's version doesn't suffer from this problem. But in any case, the concept of sharing memory between CPU and graphics is not exactly new.

      --
      "How can you claim that you are anti-crack, while still writing a window manager?" — Metacity README
    15. Re:*Yawn* by select0r · · Score: 1

      Using DirectX you can get a pointer to anywhere in video ram, be it texture space be it frambuffer space, so it must be shared in the pc arctitecture. Also in SVGA modes (and below) you've always had access to the frame buffer.

    16. Re:*Yawn* by archen · · Score: 1

      I think the verdict is still out on the hard drive thing. Hard drives are precision pieces of equipment and rather fragile really. Consoles need to be somewhat sturdy by their nature as they probably get many many times more abuse than a computer ever would. With cards about the only thing you can do is somehow kick the card sideways while inserted in something like a PS2 - and perhaps break it off. Bad sectors, hard drive crashes... it just sounds like a new can of worms to me. I guess I just have a lot more faith in the durability of solid state memory.

    17. Re:*Yawn* by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      And I think it's quite clear that the Xbox was designed (hardware-wise) specifically as a gaming system.

      Are you trying to tell me that a Pentium 3 chip is designed for gaming?

      In my opinion, the Pentium 3 was probably a bad choice for this, the only good thing about it is the portability between pcs and xbox. The bad thing about it is that the processor is designed for a desktop pc, not a console. It seems to me that you would get much better performance by designing a processor specifically for what you are trying to do, not use off the shelf hardware.

      I am not a programmer or hardware guru in any way, but I have read a lot about x86, and the drawbacks that we are facing today. I then look at the specially designed cpu's in the gamecube and ps2, and I have to wonder how good this is really going to be.

    18. Re:*Yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'stripped down PC' uses a shared memory architecture that you won't find on a modern PC.

      Those would be fightin' words in the mid 1980s when the most modern PC of the time (The Amiga) used it.

      So, does this make the XBox advanced, or retro?

    19. Re:*Yawn* by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      >And here's a newsflash for you: Do you know what >gaming consoles are? They're computational >devices hacked down to run only games.
      Newsflash for you, oh short-sighted and short of memory: the PS2 has always been positioned as a computer entertainment system. Yeah it plays games very well, but with Firewire, Ethernet and USB interfaces it's designed for computing also. AOL has a port of their disgusting software and it will be bundled with the ethernet/modem adaptor. If you've seen the full mockup of the PS2, they show a flatscreen monitor, a black keyboard and mouse, etc. Sony wants boxes like these to supplant PC's in lots of homes, and with good reason. If Joe Blow can get his mail, surf the web, and play the hottest games, then the PS2 fits the bill.

    20. Re:*Yawn* by gabebear · · Score: 1

      Memory can be mapped to an area without being in the same bank and. Hell you could map you HD(or any device's ROM,RAM,EEPROM,etc) to Memory locations if you had a 128bit CPU to address it with and a hackable BIOS.

      Originally(I'm not sure now) video memmory was mapped after the first meg of ram and that was that. I guess it is probably that way still when you boot into DOS.

    21. Re:*Yawn* by mdwebster · · Score: 1

      I'm no hardware guru myself, but it seems that there is a good reason for them going this route.

      One, they don't have to build the architecture from the ground up. Two, it's a readily available piece of hardware (read cheap, not custom built) that is being actively worked on to make it faster (read Intel CPU development), leading to easier upgradeability down the road. Imagine how easy the X-Box 2 will be to make with a Pentium 4 and provide backward compatibility with X-Box 1 titles. Three, these CPU's are no slouches when it comes to games. You have to remember a lot of the high-end CPU market is aimed at capturing gamers as they tend to be one of the largest market segments for high-end hardware. And at one point in time, P3's were high-end hardware competing with K6-3's and later on, Athlons. Their MMX routines and fast FPU performance made them the gamers choice until faster Athlons arrived on the scene. Anyway, the NVIDIA chip in the box makes up for any real shortfalls in the P3, IMO.

    22. Re:*Yawn* by boosman · · Score: 1

      Games don't need a hard drive, a dvd drive, USB port, or ethernet port.

      Have you ever been in the business of developing games?

      - Games need storage -- the more, the better. Having a hard drive means that large-scale persistent changes can be made to worlds. It opens up entirely new types of console games.

      - Games need high-capacity media. Consumers want more music, more graphics, larger worlds. DVD is the logical next step.

      - Games need some method of input. For the Xbox, USB was a great choice.

      - Games need high-bandwidth, low-latency connections for multiplayer. Building a 10Base-T port into the back was an incredibly smart move.

      Microsoft has made it clear they view Xbox as a game machine, and they have specifically and highly vocally disavowed Sony's strategy of building a game machine that's an entertainment hub. They could be lying, or they could change their minds, but there's no evidence for either of those scenarios.

      -- Frank

    23. Re:*Yawn* by bmajik · · Score: 2

      In other news, Slashdot readers were less than shocked when a clueless fanboy was incorrect on every point made in a post.

      stripped down PC

      Ah yes, stripped down in the sense that the NV2A Xbox GPU is more powerful than any nVidia card you can get ?

      PS2 superior... specific gaming system

      Ooh this one is funny. Guess what CPU the PS1 uses ? MIPS R3000. Same thing the SGI Indigo's used as well as the DECstation 5000s, not to mention a zillion embedded devices. The PS2 again uses a MIPS 4000 family CPU. Again, off the shelf stuff.

      The NES, Masterdrive, Genesis, SNES, PS1, Saturn, Dreamcast, PS2, gamecube, and XBox have all used off the shelf CPUs. And all of them except maybe XBox and Gamecube have been cpus that are already effectively obsolete in the desktop space.

      So don't delude yourself about "real console hardware".

      Besides. Superior is many things, graphics, audio, usability, features, and most importantly - games.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    24. Re:*Yawn* by bmajik · · Score: 2

      The Unified Memory that exists in Xbox is there IN THE METAL.

      Games get unfetted access to hardware. The OS runs the "dashboard", and is the gateway for access to disk/filesystem. The OS is not managing your resources, theres no VM or any bullshit like that. On the other hand, the game writers dont need to care aout the voltage level coming off of pin 2 of the 3nd controller. (if they dont want to)

      XBox is very much all about gaming. It is just as much a specific gaming machine than any dreamcast or PS2. The fact that it does a lot more than either of these should be a _benefit_, not a reason to say "its a pc".

      Games not using hard drives ? Gosh, silly of Sony to decide after the fact that they'd start shipping one for PS2. Every XBox game will utilize the hard disk in various interesting ways - because Xbox decided that gaming could really be improved with a HD as part of the standard system. Load times are faster, levels are larger, you can save a bunch of save games on the hd (and saving is faster, and you dont have to buy a memory card that you fill up after playing 4 games)

      Not to mention the ethernet connector. I love my dreamcast, but how stupid is it that i have a home lan and DSL but i would need to use a 56k modem (and tie up my only line) to use any of DCs broadband features. All to get a connection thats slow and laggy ? No thanks. With Xbox's ethernet adapter you can make lan games with a crosover cable or a hub, or eventually you'll be able to go online for MMORPGs and a number of other things.

      So yeah. Ethernet, insane graphics capability, hard disk - they aren't needed for the games of today. But xbox isn't about the games of today.

      Xbox is about the games of tomorrow.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    25. Re:*Yawn* by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

      The ps2 is backward compatable with the ps1, so you really cant say that it is a benefit of using an off the shelf cpu.

      I agree with most of what you say, BUT, I still think that they would have been better off making something from the ground up. Its not like microsoft doens't have the money to do so =).

      Also, you say that these cpu's are not slouches for games, I agree, we all use them to play games everyday. There are also a lot of 'stuff' that is associated with x86 that we are trying to get away from (like I said im not a hardware guru, but this is what I gather). I mean you take an x86 based processor, lets say a 733mhz chip, and put it against a similar G4 733mhz chip, who wins?

    26. Re:*Yawn* by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      Well, let's look at the majority of boards out there. I contend they fall into one of two categories:

      1. The video is "on board". The video chip has no physical memory of its own and must use some of the system memory. This is very common for low price consumer PCs (like eMachines).

      2. The video is on an AGP card. The system bios will have an "AGP Aperture" setting so that the chipset will map physical addresses requested by the processor to addresses on the AGP card.

      In both those cases, as far as the processor is concerned the video memory itself is simply part of the total sum of physical addressing space.

      AGP was originally sold as a technology that was going to save us tons of money because video cards would no longer need to have on board RAM. Instead they could use some of the system memory. This is exactly how case #1 above works. All those "on board video" motherboards claim the video is AGP... because it is.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    27. Re:*Yawn* by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
      As far as apps are concerned, the framebuffer is directly accessible because it's (optionally) mapped into the same address space.

      But electrically, there's this thing called an 'AGP bus' in between. That's the limiting factor here - The Xbox CPU has full bandwidth access to the raw geometry, textures etc, and the GPU does too. On a PC with an AGP bus, data must be painstakingly transferred manually or via DMA over a relatively slow connection (extremely slow, if you want to read data back again).

      By an astounding coincidence, the nForce motherboard has an 'enhanced AGP' bus to the main memory, equivalent to AGP 6x, as the graphics core also has direct access to main memory. I'd assume it works fairly similarly to the Xbox...

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    28. Re:*Yawn* by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      Have you ever been in the business of developing games?

      Yes, actually. I spent the first five years of my professional software career (91-96) writing games for Amiga, CD-I, Macintosh, DOS and Windows.

      Now, let's see if I can think of a few gaming consoles that haven't needed a hard drive, dvd drive, ethernet port and USB port... Ummm... Hmmm... Atari 2600, NES, Sega Master System, SNES, Genesis, N64, PS 1, Saturn... That's a lot of systems, and I'm not really trying.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    29. Re:*Yawn* by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      Many low cost PCs use motherboards with "onboard video", but no video memory. The video chips use some of the system memory for their video memory. This was the original promise of AGP.

      I compare low cost all in one motherboards because that's what the xbox uses.

      This unified architecture is not at all foreign to the PC. The big difference here is that the video chip is not usually a GeForce.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    30. Re:*Yawn* by Wavicle · · Score: 2

      That's sarcasm, right?

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    31. Re:*Yawn* by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      And for a PC motherboard that is equivalent to the Xbox where the video chip is on the motherboard but no video memory is... What then? How is the memory for video electrically isolated from the rest of the memory.

      You don't see many rogue apps writing all over the screen on your PC - the directly accessible frame buffer isn't as directly accessible as one might think because the kernel has put the memory into a protected page descriptor. (obvious exception for directx)

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    32. Re:*Yawn* by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
      Most integrated motherboards still use the AGP bus protocol to arbitrate access between the VGA core & the memory, so they're still limited in exactly the same way (worse, of course, as most integrated systems offer only 64 bit/133 MHz access at best - 1 GB/s absolute max, shared between ALL components, CPU & graphics included. The CPU alone can consume that much).

      XBox has a 128 bit/200 MHz DDR memory bus (6.4 GB/s) shared, and the difference is of course obvious. nForce also has a 128 bit memory bus, at 133 MHz DDR, for 4.2 GB/s.

      And yes, as I said the framebuffer mapping into user space is optional (done only for DirectX), but that's irrelevant. Memory-mapped IO is not the same as a UMA shared-memory architecture. It's a convenience for programmers only; it doesn't greatly affect performance.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    33. Re:*Yawn* by mdwebster · · Score: 1

      Well, for the sake of posterity and the possibility you check your comment records, the only reason the PS2 plays PS1 games is that they have the PS1 chip in the PS2. Wouldn't have to do that with a straight x86 architecture.

  14. Interesting pictures by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    The XBox looks really as advertised made of "standard components". Looks like it shoudn't be too hard to replace the harddisk for example.

    Also I was wondering, does that GeForce3 have a standard VGA-out, or only television? I mean, if this this is hackable or even if you would be able to run some Windows verions(Hey Bill: release "Windows XBox", killer sale!) on it (or Linux, even better) it would have great potential for budget PC-replacement. Some people just don't have the dough to pay a budget-PC (no kidding, I recently helped someone still using his 286), or it represents two paychecks.

    For the rest the components are really tightly fitted together. Fan on the CPU (graphic chip?) and behinde the huge heatsink. I'd just fear for overheating. It think it shoudn't be put close to the VCR and DVD player but somewhere well aerated.

    Well as for disassembling these things: I admire the people who do this. I couldn't shell out that amount of money to disassembe it and have the risk that I can't put it back togehter. On old hardware okay, but on new it would break my heart.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Interesting pictures by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Looks like it shoudn't be too hard to replace the harddisk for example.

      And format/partition it how, exactly? I'd almost bet real money that fdisk and friends aren't included with any xbox software.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    2. Re:Interesting pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > (Hey Bill: release "Windows XBox", killer sale!)

      Microsoft has been making the mistake of attacking its customers. A few years ago it was attacking DR-DOS, Novell, Unix, WordPerfect, etc, its competitors, but it ran out of these. It moved Windows NT to larger configurations and attacked HP and, mainly, IBM in the server and data centre market.

      IBM has responded with Linux.

      With X-Box MS has attacked Sony, one of its large customers for Windows. I will expect Sony to respond, not only with, say, PS3, but also by dropping Windows as soon as possible and selling laptops with BeOS or Linux. Why would you continue to send bucket loads of money to someone attacking your product range ?

      A 'Windows XBox' as a cheap PC replacement would be direct attacks upon Dell, GateWay, ComPaq and every other PC maker. It would put them all in a situation where MS sells a cheaper system, forcing them to reduce prices and profit margins even further, but also takes a fixed amount off every sale they manage to make against MS.

      Yes, I hope MS does make a 'Windows XBox', 'killer' it would be, it would be interesting to see the aftermath ;-)

  15. I know this is slashdot by t0qer · · Score: 1

    and it's bad to say "cool beans" about anything MS, but cool beans man!

    It looks just like a PC inside! The power connector is old school AMP connectors from the pre ATX days.

    The CPU isn't socketed.. Boo MS boo, PGA connectors are only an extra 20 bucks man. I do like the fan design however, that is a big honkin fan blowing over some nice thin fins.

    Bad thing about the pics is I can't read any of the writing on the chips. I wanna know what kind of glue chips this thing is using. Is it the new NV motherboard chipset or an intel? I'm guessing the hard drive is a seagate, they're OK but for tinkering purposes I would replace it with my preffered brand.

    300 bucks is not a bad price for this toy. All dvd players can read CDroms, would be cool to use it as a base for a car MP3 player. Has a built in RF converter so I can hook it up to my TV without a special monitor. Woah nellie.

    Sorta reminds me of the 8-bit days for some reason.

    1. Re:I know this is slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The CPU isn't socketed.. Boo MS boo, PGA connectors are only an extra 20 bucks man.

      Uh, $20 is a lot of money when you're designing a product that you're going to sell in the millions at a negative profit -- that's around 7% of your total retail price! Companies that design multi-thousand-dollar products for a profit spend lots of time sweating out how to shave a buck or two out of the costs wherever they can.

      You're not going to put several million $20 PGA connectors out there for no good reason, and for MSFT's intended use for this product, there's absolutely no good reason to socket the CPU.

    2. Re:I know this is slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a variant on the new Nvidia chipsets. Main difference seems to be the encryption crap (Ghost won't copy it, a drive copier won't touch it, gonna try good ol dd next...)

    3. Re:I know this is slashdot by t0qer · · Score: 1

      could you post a iso of it?

  16. Is XBox noisy ? by n-tone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've seen there are two fans in XBox/10Box. So, the question is : Is the XBox/10Box more noisy than my Dell PowerEdge 1400 ?

    1. Re:Is XBox noisy ? by Radnor · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it is not noisy, nor is it very hot, even after a long game of Halo. My PS2 is noiser and hotter than my XBox. My Dreamcast is noiser than either of those two.

      On another note, it's nice to go into the memory settings and see "50,000+ blocks free" rather than something like "15/128 blocks free". Thats with a saved game from each of my 3 launch titles, too. =)

    2. Re:Is XBox noisy ? by Red+Avenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its pretty darn silent. I think this could be classified as a "silent pc". Can't really hear the fan (the dreamcast is much louder than this thing). Sometimes I can hear the hard drive purring.

      And BTW this thing is dang cool. Played Halo for 7 hours straight last night (this morning?). Totally awesome game. For those that are complaining about load times its about 10 seconds for Halo which I think is pretty good. Some may disagree. On the whole I am glad I got the console. Can't wait till I save up enough for Project Gotham. Now that looks cool.

    3. Re:Is XBox noisy ? by bmoyles · · Score: 1

      Not really. I worked with some XBox developers at Midway and they had the latest dev kits (clear versions of final hardware), but they weren't noisy. Problem is, they're the *size* of your PowerEdge :) This is one big ass console!

    4. Re:Is XBox noisy ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very quiet but generates a fair amount of heat. I'm semi-impressed. It's a hell of a machine but the selection of launch games is lacking. I picked up Halo and Project Gotham and enjoy them, but they're nothing special. Halo would be much more enjoyable on a PC, where I could use a mouse to control it. Using the analog stick to control your perspective isn't as fluid.

      The PS2 wins for now on the basis that it is comparable graphically and has a -far- better selection of games. It's been out longer of course, but that doesn't change the fact it's true. I enjoy my PS2 a lot and will probably enjoy my XBox, but for now my PS2 is first chair. Metal Gear Solid 2, Grand Theft Auto 3, Tony Hawk 3, the upcoming Final Fantasy X and XI, etc give the PS2 a huge advantage.

      Also, there appears to be no way to make use of the XBox's ethernet adapter as of yet. I am planning on connecting it to my LAN to see if it has an active DHCP client. If it does then I'll portscan it and see if there are any open ports or services. Wouldn't it be funny if it were running some stripped version of IIS that left the hard drive vulnerable? Talk about having millions of new places to hide information. Half the kids out there would never even notice 20% of their XBox hard drives being filled with secret MP3 porn. :D

    5. Re:Is XBox noisy ? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I thought it was more quiet then my PS2 - its amazingly quiet. I thought for instance it didn't have a HD at first - but if you put your ear right up against it you can hear it somewhat.

  17. What's the point of OC? by Shaheen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most people would want to overclock a system for higher framerates, but it's pointless on Xbox, because the framerate is tied to the refresh rate of the display. This is why you will get a constant 60 or 30 frames per second on most games, rather than massively varying framerates like in PC games.

    The reason to lock the framerate is that this frees up processing time for other threads in your application to do things like physics simulation, collision detection, etc.

    --
    You should never take life too seriously - You'll never get out of it alive.
    1. Re:What's the point of OC? by Tubster · · Score: 0, Informative

      Have you even read any reviews of for example Halo? When the going gets tough, the xbox drops its framerate considerably. Perhaps it will alleviate this problem..

    2. Re:What's the point of OC? by hyrdra · · Score: 4, Informative

      The framerate is not in fact fixed on any system. Consoles run programs just like any other computer system, and those programs can do whatever they want with their processor time. They can spend all their time pushing scene detail to the GPU (even through only 30 fps makes the cut), doing physics calculations, etc. I'm sure any intelligent game programmer won't try to push for 100 fps on a 29.97 NTSC output, but you never know and it's still a possibility.

      You also neglected to mention that the PC framerates of 172 are also not viewable because there aren't many people running their monitors with a VSYNC of 180 Hz (or similar, not that many monitors support refresh rates this high). So it's just wasted, which just reaffirms the fact the crazy watercooling overclockin' gamers are really crazy...

      --


      "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
    3. Re:What's the point of OC? by Shaheen · · Score: 2

      Yes, this is entirely true. However, having worked on Xbox, I know for a fact that developers use such an API call to lock the amount of time spent drawing scenes.

      Of course, as you said, it's up to the developer to do this. But then again, MS has specific constraints about framerates of games (as does Sony and Nintendo). Basically, if you can't guarantee your game will run at 60fps all the way through, then you'll have to run at 30. This is so that players do not gripe about visual quality due to framerate (because when it's locked, it's always the same).

      --
      You should never take life too seriously - You'll never get out of it alive.
    4. Re:What's the point of OC? by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I'm sure any intelligent game programmer won't try to push for 100 fps on a 29.97 NTSC output, but you never know and it's still a possibility.

      Actually, it isn't. If your display's vertical refresh isn't an integer divisor of your application frame rate, you'll actually end up dropping frames on the output. At some point, determined by the ratio of display refresh rate to app frame rate, the two cycles will be sufficiently out of sync that the display refreshes when a new frame isn't available in the framebuffer. Poof. Dropped frame.

      In hard-real-time applications, like flight simulation for instance, making sure the vertical sync signal given to your graphics hardware is used as the basis for your application frame clock is very, very important. When you're dealing with the relatively low refresh rates of analog TV, it's important even for game consoles.

    5. Re:What's the point of OC? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      The point of trying to get such high framerates is so the framrate will stay above 60fps when there is a bunch of stuff happening on the screen at the same time.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. why? by geomcbay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would anyone overclock the XBox, unless they first managed to figure out how to run a standardish OS on it?

    The only benefit would be extremely increased system instability on a system already known to have heating issues when not very-well ventilated....

    Virtually all console games are frame-locked to 30 or 60 fps, so its not like you're going to get any performance increase out of your games.

    Sounds like a waste of time.

    1. Re:why? by juggleme · · Score: 1

      It depends on the bottleneck, but it might help get rid of dropped frames when things get exceptionally busy. Console games are most definitely not immune to dropped frames, especially once you get 4 players with their own screens in a 3D shooter...

    2. Re:why? by James+Foster · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about overclocking?!? Everyones excited at the prospect of underclocking it and making it more stable... for sure!

  19. RAM Architecture by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Informative
    Interesting. I didn't know that. But isn't essentially AGP doing the same stuff? The graphics card hogging your system RAM and disallowing access to it for the rest of the system. My previous system had 128Meg RAM and a 64Meg Aperture...now games woudn't fluidly play at all. Upgrading the mem was enough. Another system with 128Meg RAM and a PCI card ran the games I tried fluently even with a lot of lesser specs and same OS.

    To me it looks to me that if you want to port, let's say Linux, to it you would have to define the address range you want to use for graphics displaying and the rest for the system. "Just" separate them in software, you know the amount of RAM anyway for the hardware. Not that I could do it, but it probably is a quite simple exerice for someone with the right experience.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:RAM Architecture by rela · · Score: 1
      Interesting. I didn't know that. But isn't essentially AGP doing the same stuff? The graphics card hogging your system RAM and disallowing access to it for the rest of the system. My previous system had 128Meg RAM and a 64Meg Aperture...now games woudn't fluidly play at all. Upgrading the mem was enough. Another system with 128Meg RAM and a PCI card ran the games I tried fluently even with a lot of lesser specs and same OS.

      Nah, yer confusing address space with actual memory. Having the address space shared between video memory and system RAM have used the same address space since the first PC, making it easy to write directly to the screen.

      But the actual memory IS separate. And AGP Apeture is just a hole in the address space where the video memory is set up to appear. Your regular system memory is still 128. The 64 is on the graphics card, not stolen from your system. Of course, 128 mb isn't much anymore, depending on your OS and what games you play.

      In the Xbox, as well as some cheapo HP PCs, the actual MEMORY itself is shared, there's no dedicated video memory, the video card just takes some system memory as needed. This is as big a crock as it sounds. =)

    2. Re:RAM Architecture by Tassach · · Score: 2

      In the Xbox, as well as some cheapo HP PCs, the actual MEMORY itself is shared


      The Amiga used to work this way (sort of). (Of course, in those days, memory was insanely expensive by today's standard). Actually, it's a pretty smart idea, as it allows you to use memory that would otherwise be wasted. It's a shame Gateway never did anything with the old Amiga patents -- there's a LOT of tech from the Amiga that would be very useful in a set-top box, even today. [I wonder if x-box licenses any of it?]
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    3. Re:RAM Architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Amiga did this! Everything before the PC did this. You think C64s and old Ataris did page flipping by blitting from offscreen memory? Ha! You just changed the screen pointer to another page. If Gateway has a patent on this, it wouldn't hold up for 10 seconds in court. I'm sure the Amiga was great and all, but it didn't originate every computer technology.

  20. A good read on the Xbox being a PC issue... by Glonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On Byte.com dated April 11, 2001.

    So yes, AGP sort-of does some of this stuff. But there is still the issue of going on different busses to get to the CPU and RAM from the card, instead of a direct physical link between them. As far as the Xbox is concerned, the GPU is another CPU but is only sent instructions for doing graphics. I guess you could say it's kinda like SMP.

    1. Re:A good read on the Xbox being a PC issue... by VA+Software · · Score: 1

      I guess you could say it's kinda like SMP.

      Or exactly like Asymmetrical Multi-Processing

      --

      ---
      http://slashdot.org/moderation.shtml
  21. Connectix by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

    Didn't Connectix reverse engineer the Playstation so the games could be played on a Mac? (I forget what the name of the product was). They were sued, but won. So what's to prevent this company from doing the same thing with the xbox.

    Also, is MS going to have games released [b]only[/b] on the xbox, and NOT on Windows xxxx?

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    1. Re:Connectix by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Informative

      The DMCA. If you reverse engineer it and try to profit off that information, you've violated federal law today. The code inside is copyright MS, you broke the code, you sold it, you go to jail.

      Isn't the land of the free wonderful? :-/

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Connectix by shiva600 · · Score: 1

      Its the Virtual Game Station, which was an impressive piece of software, imho.
      They stopped selling it this June, but are however working on a playstation 2 emulator.
      I dont know about XBox-Emulation, but judging from their experience with Console Emulation and Virtual PC, im pretty sure they could do it.

    3. Re:Connectix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, the answer ?
      Playstation = Japanese technology
      XBox = US crap

      Yanks don't give a crap about stolen Jap technology, but will sue the first one who tries to steal theirs. Fucking morons.

    4. Re:Connectix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the outcome was that Sony bought them off (meaning there will be no VGS 2).

    5. Re:Connectix by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      Sony v. Connectix was decided after the DMCA had been passed.

      Reverse engineering is still legal. Using it to create a copyright circumvention device is not.

      Therefore, reverse engineering the MS-BIOS to boot linux instead of a game is OK, but to allow running dupes of games is not OK.

      Making an intermediate copy of the MS-BIOS in order to reverse engineer it is fair use. That is precisely what Sony v. Connectix was about.

  22. Can't wait to see a beowulf cluster of those... by Juju · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Imagine, not only it is cheap, but it will cost Microsoft money!!!
    Consoles are sold with a loss, and the money is made from selling the software.

    It has got a harddisk (10Gb), a not so bad CPU (PIII 733), 64Mb of Memory , network ports and is built with commodity PC hardware...
    So taking the X-Box, finding an easy way to format and re-install Linux + beowulf software and you get a cheap way to build clusters.

    With it's GeForce 2 and good soundcard, you could even make it a decent PC (a bit short on memory though).

    --
    Black holes occur when God divides by zero.
  23. Give me an.. by saqmaster · · Score: 1

    ... ISP..

    I wonder who will be the first to release a 1U rack mount case for use with the XBOX internals?

    At 1/3 the cost of a Cobalt RAQ, and technically superior, this seems a pretty good candidate..

    Does anyone know of any restrictions in place on the XBOX that could stop it's use as a webserver or other similar device? I've not heard of any.

    --
    "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story..."
    1. Re:Give me an.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wonder who will be the first to release a 1U rack mount case for use with the XBOX internals?

      At 1/3 the cost of a Cobalt RAQ, and technically superior, this seems a pretty good candidate..

      Define "technically superior" in terms of what you're envisioning. Stuff like the RAQ is designed from the ground up to be run in a racked datacenter environment, has people you can call when it blows up, and in the case of Cobalt's stuff is already preintegrated with the software you need to get your job done.

      The materials cost and time you spend getting the hardware refribbed, and setting up the software you need to run something other than Halo, and the cost of discarding the boxes every couple of weeks when they blow up, not to mention the cost of ill-will of whoever your customers are when your site is down most of the time, is going to eat up anything you save by repurposing a video game console.

      Also, since M$ is selling these at a loss, the antibodies flowing out of Redmond to stop things like this from happening should be a wonder to behold...

  24. The actual pictures are here... by at-b · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here're some direct links to the pictures, without having to jump through hoops. (TechTV's not particulary standards-compliant site that crashed Konq on me once; the dreadful JS that is used for *everything*; the pop-ups required to get to the pictures; the slowness of the site)
    Please no Karma claims; I'm at the cap - it's just a much more convenient way to get to the actual images.

    Xbox screws
    Warning
    Pat sizes thing up
    Righty-tighty, lefty-loosey
    Just a couple more to go
    Under the hood
    Hard Drive
    The motherboard
    These hands have killed Athlons
    CPU central
    Intel inside

    The 'silly' link titles are TechTV's, not mine. You may have to copy/paste the shortcuts into your URL bar in case TechTV's site plays nasty with image linking from other sites. (I don't think it does, though)

    Alex T-B
    St Andrews

    1. Re:The actual pictures are here... by yatest5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Blimey - I viewed it with IE and it was absolutely fine! Bit of a shocker that eh - I thought *everything* microsoft did was a bunch of crap ;-).

      --
      • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    2. Re:The actual pictures are here... by Whelkman · · Score: 2

      It didn't crash Konqueror on me, but, then again, Konqueror crashes on me often enough.

    3. Re:The actual pictures are here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On the other hand, I tried using IE5 to view that page on Win98 & it's now been locked up for about 10 minutes from it.


      *shrug*

    4. Re:The actual pictures are here... by markmoss · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, I tried using IE5 to view that page on Win98 & it's now been locked up for about 10 minutes from it. I didn't wait that long, but same here. It's not crashing IE5, but it's not sending through the pictures either, and somehow it has suppressed both the progress bar-graph and the IE5 timeout to a "page not available" sort of message.

      So use the links above. They work fine (so far)...

    5. Re:The actual pictures are here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you talk like that all the time?

    6. Re:The actual pictures are here... by seann · · Score: 1

      odd
      only time konq crashes on me is on really gay sites.

      and thats often.
      (I don't goto gay sites much?)

      are you running redhat or mandrake?

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    7. Re:The actual pictures are here... by Whelkman · · Score: 2

      Debian, but I do have on that "conserve memory" feature which takes the whole thing down if anything hiccups. Even with that on it consumes about 100 MB of RAM after two days of use.

    8. Re:The actual pictures are here... by stevelup · · Score: 1

      I viewed the site with Konq with no problems. I accept that ultimately, the site is a cheesy waste of time though!!!

      The link titles are truly awful - can't argue with that...

      Ps. My first ever post after reading Slashdot for absolutely ages. Strange that it is for a subject so unimportant to life the universe and everything. Oh well...

    9. Re:The actual pictures are here... by seann · · Score: 1

      that's strangly odd
      I leave konq running for days, weeks
      *even mozilla*
      and never get serious memory usage

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  25. mp3 by leuk_he · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All dvd players can read CDroms....MP3 player

    Wrong. Not all dvd drives can read cd-r cd roms. This has to do something with the color of the laser. Since a mp3 cd would be self made (I think you want to burn your own). this might nog be the solution you want.

    just look on mp3.com for your own mp3 car radio.

  26. Slashdot Bias by Almace · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If any other company in the world released a console as easy to hack as the xbox looks to be everyone on slashdot would be foaming at the mouth to port linux to it. What the hell is the point? I mean seriously I have netBSD for my DreamCast but who gives a shit. All the support for the PS2 on slashdot is kinda hypocritical considering Sony is damn near a monopoly on everything in japan. I wish I had gotten mod today just so I could mod down as many fuckwits and laggots as possible!

    --
    Remember,democracy never lasts long.It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. John Adams (1814)
  27. Upgrading by YearOfTheDragon · · Score: 0

    A PC like machine is easy to upgrade, but everybody knows that upgrades in the game console world are not a very good idea.
    SEGA MegaCD and 32X Megadrive upgrades were a waste of time and effort.

    What is going to happen with something as easy as change a 10Gb HD with a 80Gb?
    Is going Microsoft to be caught by the temptation of the upgrades?
    I don't think so. Microsoft is very kind with the history and changes of the markets where wants a monoply.
    And X-Box II is sure under development.

    --
    -= If you fight Dragons long enough, you will become a Dragon =-
  28. hmmmm.... by bunnie · · Score: 5, Informative

    pics are small and hard to read, but if I'm seeing things right, there's what looks to be a standard TSOP packaged FLASH ROM in there. Very desolderable and readable...too bad all the stores around here are sold out of XBOXes. I'm supposing someone's already done it, but if not, as soon as I can get my hands on one I'd be glad to provide the ROM contents to interested parties.

    FYI, the gamecube ROM appears to be merged into the DRAM chip, so good luck hacking. There are five chips (basically) in the GC: PPC core, ATI "flipper" chip, 2 MoSys SSRAMs, and the "ARAM" part. No ROM on the list...however, when the disc unit is removed, system still boots okay, so there has to be a ROM on that board somewhere. I guess it's in the ARAM because it's the only chip that is cheap enough/simple enough to accomodate a mask ROM as part of its contents. Perhaps it is a stacked RAM-ROM package or a multi-die on lead frame package...gotta get another gamecube and bust out the sulfuric acid on the package...

    having seen these pictures of the inside of the x-box and the inside of the gamecube first-hand, though, I'll have to say that the gamecube wins hands down for elegance of design. The 14-month design cycle of the x-box is painfully evident. Look at the size of the x-box motherboard! The gamecube motherboard looks to be the footprint of the processor heatsink on the x-box. :-P agh, and that ugly power supply....and all those empty spots on the motherboard. Future upgrade potential, maybe...And *two* fans!!! no surprise M$ is losing $100+ per box. I'm not sure about Gamecube, but at $100 cheaper than X-box, they could still be making money on the console with its clean design and small parts count...

    of course, good hardware is only half the formula for success of the console. Games are important too...

    And so the final big question is: what do you do when 50% of the units shipped have failed hard drives after 3 years? Those can't be "quality" hard drives in the x-boxes, and they probably aren't working in the friendliest of conditions...

    1. Re:hmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the harddisk is definitely going to be taking a battering. It's not even a 2.5" notebook drive, at least that would be something.

      This is not a heavy PC, it's small enough that kids are going to sling this thing into their ruck sacks when they go and play with their friends. Does anyone know the make of the harddisk?

    2. Re:hmmmm.... by WyrdOne · · Score: 0

      The hard drive is a Seagate 5400 rpm ATA100 drive. The black rubber shock harness give it away.

      Seagates can take quite a beating and still keep ticking. We accidentaly had a computer dropped about a story, most everything else was fubar but the hard drive was still working. (coworkers accidentally pushed it over and out a window while rearranging his desk).

    3. Re:hmmmm.... by mrm677 · · Score: 2, Informative

      My Seagate IDE drive crashed after a year. Piece of shit.

    4. Re:hmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this is intended to keep linux of the box and cover hd failures. A boot rom is a lot more inconvient to than a HD. Wonder how long before they solder that rom in there after the machine is hacked. I doubt it is now since the product is still in early release.

    5. Re:hmmmm.... by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      Where are you located? I'm in Santa Cruz & have compadres in San Jose & further up the peninsula interested in hacking the xbox. Read my earlier message for more.

    6. Re:hmmmm.... by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      Oh... you're in Cambridge. It's kind of hard to collaborate over the net on a project that requires hacking the hardware, huh? We can always share ideas once we've disassembled the boot ROM though.

    7. Re:hmmmm.... by bunnie · · Score: 1
      Yes, that's right...I'm in cambridge.


      I guess it may be tough to collaborate. I've got experience in rapid proto & guerilla hardware design & teardown, tho, so if you do not already have that skill set in your group, it may be worth keeping in touch anyways.



      Is getting the ROM contents out an issue, or have you guys got that under control? I'm still just waiting in line to *buy* one of these suckers.

    8. Re:hmmmm.... by donglekey · · Score: 2

      Here in Topeka, KS at Circuit City we only got 19 in, and ended up selling only 14. We were selling them in bundles, so that is surely part of it, when people could go down the street to Best Buy and get one un-bundled. That, and I convinced one couple to come back and buy a Gamecube :)

    9. Re:hmmmm.... by bunnie · · Score: 1

      it's pretty ridiculous out here. I refuse to buy a bundle...but things are so backed up some people are taking pre-orders for allocations now. :-P could be weeks...one vendor says not till after thanksgiving. more business for nintendo? ;-)

    10. Re:hmmmm.... by donglekey · · Score: 1

      Nintendo is shipping twice the original units they have said. I think many people will jump ship and go with good ol' nintendo when all is said and done.

    11. Re:hmmmm.... by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      Well, we used to all work for a company that went insane (so we had to quit), but gave us some good $$ anyway. A couple of us aren't "working" right now & others are working part-time or (me) annoyed & ready to quit.

      We're all embedded software people, and we have access to an SMT lab & logic analyzers & scopes & a modern ROM burner, so we're equipped, but it's a matter of motivation. We've been talking about starting a company to do various projects for 6 months now & know we won't have many chances, so want to make sure it's a good project. This one isn't the greatest, but it'll bring us publicity & maybe investment.

      I wish I were still in grad school. I did shit then that I think would be impossible now.

    12. Re:hmmmm.... by edmudama · · Score: 1

      non-operational shock characteristics for most drives allow them to absorb a flat-on shock in the 200-400G range. This is when they're dropped flat, because the HSA (head stack assembly) and media flex with nearly the same resonant frequencies, preventing severe damage in most cases.

      When the drive is dropped on its end, or worse, on a corner, they can take significantly less of a beating, because the shock can result in misalignment of the platter on the spindle which can be a huge problem with today's data densities. They should still function, but performance will go WAY down because every seek will take an extra rev (11.11ms at 5400) due to misaligned skew.

      Operational shock is only a few G's, but if you're dropping in a plugged in and operating computer, you're a moron in the first place.

      --e

      --
      More data, damnit!
    13. Re:hmmmm.... by edmudama · · Score: 1

      meant to say MORE, not less of a beating when dropped on the end or corner

      --
      More data, damnit!
    14. Re:hmmmm.... by bunnie · · Score: 1

      ...and the average X-box user is...going to place the console on the floor, where baby brother gets to run past, catch feet on the cords and drag the box on the ground...mmm...hard drive.

    15. Re:hmmmm.... by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 1

      That's a Seagate U-series drive. They're pretty damn reliable, but they're not the fastest things in the world.

      I bought one for my parents a couple years ago as a christmas present, back when they were brand new. Their (insert name brand hunk of shit model here) has horrible ventilation, but even after running for several hours - all buttoned up - the drive was barely warm to the touch.

      I suspect there'll be more cases of idiotic children bumping consoles off shelves, etc. with the drives in motion, heads meeting platters. In any case, MS will be blamed, since the children are, of course, blameless and angelic.

      Yes, this could work out nicely... mwahahaha...

      --

      Moof!

  29. Oh my.. by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 1

    All of the comments remind me of the movie Meet the Parents:

    "I have nipples, could you milk me?"

    Only here it's:

    "It has a hard drive, can we install Linux?"

    --


    My sig of choice is Marlboro
    1. Re:Oh my.. by Spooge+Demon · · Score: 0
      "I have nipples, could you milk me?"


      Only if you're lactating.

  30. ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since he is trying to figure ou thow it works, is he breaking the DMCA or something like that?

  31. Like a Buick by krmt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, at least we know why the XBox shouldn't be moved without a forklift - the damn hard drive is taking up more than a quarter of the space. Since no other console has it, I think it's fair to say that without the hard drive the XBox would be more on par in terms of size. The controllers though, are still bigger than Australia.

    Makes you wonder how badly they wanted the hard drive though. It certainly would have cut down on cost and size had they not included it, but they obviously didn't care too much about size or else they would have fixed the controllers. I personally think the hard drive is a dumb idea, but then, I think console games and PC games should remain forever separate (case in point: my friend tonight asked me if he should buy a USB mouse, keyboard, and $50 PS2 copy of Deus Ex, or just buy the $20 PC version of the game). I dunno, does anyone feel that the hard drive will really be a help to the console? I'd assume it goes along with their whole vision of it being MyDigitalEntertainmentX-Hub(tm). And we all know how people are wetting themselves for one of those!

    Come back with a better form factor, a good price point, and some cool titles and I'll buy one. Right now though, I'm thinking Game Cube.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    1. Re:Like a Buick by autocracy · · Score: 1

      PS2 has space for one. Slightly non-standard, but a hard drive. Expanding that slot to take a stand 3.5" drive wouldn't take too much space (is it already that size?)

      --
      SIG: HUP
    2. Re:Like a Buick by archen · · Score: 1

      which brings up the question, what happens when you trash the boot sector, or something like the file system? I'm pretty sure MS thought of this, and there is a lot of protection against this sort of thing, but people just decide to turn a console on and off at a whim and to me it seems that sooner or later the file system on a hard drive would end up damaged. If you get the root of the file system, then what? New MS doorstop?

    3. Re:Like a Buick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >but people just decide to turn a console on and off at a whim and to me it seems that sooner or later the file system on a hard drive would end up damaged.

      I'm pretty certain the "important" code is read-only most (if not all) of the time. The section carrying not so important stuff like scores and saved games would be read-write.

      For this reason, like a linux box that's mounted read-only, you don't need to worry about turning it off in the middle of stuff. :-)

    4. Re:Like a Buick by erasmus_ · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm glad you think a hard drive is a dumb idea. That's sort of (the opposite of) what I was thinking when I ripped a bunch of audio tracks onto it yesterday, and was playing them instead of the game soundtrack, completely enhancing my gameplay. Oh, and it's horrible that I don't have to buy memory cards as well, or worry about running out of space for saved games. The hard drive is a feature that other consoles will soon regret not having.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    5. Re:Like a Buick by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
      It's not a PC. It boots from a BIOS into flash ROM, and/or from a DVD. It doesn't need to install a separate OS to the harddrive, it's all built-in, permanently.

      Besides, the filesystem would be journal-based anyway, so the chances of damaging it would be slim. Losing the game you just saved, maybe, but I doubt you'd even need the harddrive there to boot, if it came to that.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    6. Re:Like a Buick by andrewski · · Score: 1

      A 3.5" half-height hard drive would fit perfectly normally inside a ps2. I know, because I tried. Also, the same bay is the perfect size for PUTTING WEED IN THERE!!!!!!!!!

  32. Re:Dude, you are insensitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...please, screwdivers have feelings too you know. Think next time, ok?

  33. Or is it? by O2n · · Score: 3, Funny

    Warning: doing this might reduce your eBay resale value.

    Only if you conisder selling yourself.
    Come to think of, I thought slavery was abolished looong time ago. Hmmm... :)

  34. nice try poser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....it's called 'snowballing'... Nice of you to let us know you're a wannabe.

    If you people are going to take the shock-value smut route, at least lend some authenticity, please....

    You, of course, haven't been in the same room with real sex since your parents concieved you thru a bedsheet, which is where the vast majority of the DNA required for original thought still remains.

  35. Danger Danger Will Robinson by slashnik · · Score: 1

    Is that an uncased switch mode powersupply I can see in one of the pictures. If so I wouldn't go near it with a barge poll.
    Anybody got any saftey tops when handling SM-PSU's

  36. Hackable...? by CheezeyWheezy · · Score: 1

    Is it just me? Or does it seem as if the X-Box will be very easy to "hack"? How easy would it be to make an X-Box emulator, since its gfx card isnt even the best on the market. Someone with a GForce3ti would have a pretty large advantage over the X-Box. Plus, it didnt take very long for "hackers" to figure out a way to play coppies of games on the PS2, which has its very own processor that was designed just for it, so I dont think it will take very long for there to be a way to play coppies of X-Box games.. plus.. its a Microsoft product people!!! it will no doubtly crash on a daily basis!! I mean c'mon.. its just common sense!

    1. Re:Hackable...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Right, OK, off you go then. Please impress us all with your hacking mastery, and while you're at it, give us lecture on shared GPU/CPU memory space and Ring 0. We expect to see your emulator in the next 4 weeks. There WILL be a variety of hacks out for the system, but they will be made by genuinely intelligent people who spend more time coding and less time boasting.

      Go on! What are you waiting for?
      The community is ready to be held in awe...
      Bloody school kids.

  37. Yes, but how do you really feel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lame: Websters defines 'lame' as crippled or otherwise incapable.

    It seems clear ST, that you have been given the gift of intelligence. Please let us know when you take it out of the box.

    1. Re:Yes, but how do you really feel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, that was lame.

      You gimpy slant-eyed shit licker.

  38. So cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft had a significant promo spot on Just Shoot Me last night. Looks like they're really trying hard to sell this thing to the 12 year olds.

    I wonder how much they had to pay for it. Anyone know?

    1. Re:So cool by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      They also had at least two blatant plugs on Will and Grace.
      Quite shameless, really.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    2. Re:So cool by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Last night was a terrible night for TV! Scrubs and The Tick were runing concurrently, so I ended up trying to watch both, comprehending neither! *sigh* What I did see of the Tick renewed my faith that the show will at least be decent...

      As for the Will & Grace spot, I almost wanted to vomit. Microsoft should be punished in the marketplace (by consumers) for such blatant, badly done plugs.

      I haven't seen anything on that scale of cheese since Fred Savage played Super Mario 3 with the Power Glove in The Wizard . Sheesh.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    3. Re:So cool by banuaba · · Score: 2

      dammit! I knew there was something I was supposed to be doing last night. Stupid Metal Gear Solid 2.

      Now that game rules, btw.

      --


      Brant

      Argle. Bargle.
    4. Re:So cool by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      They were also plugging some stupid rainbow-colored boots earlier in the show. The remainder of Will & Grace was about 20 minutes of Karen and Jack's son locked in a room together with an XBox and Xbox screen in full view all the time. At least it wasn't as bad as having the Evil One (tm) do a guest spot on the 200th Frasier. But still, these product plugs are removing any last bit of dignity that the show had.

      I've seen other episodes of Will & Grace where they're plugging Razor scooters, those little IM pages and how you can use the pager to bid on Ebay. I'll know it's time to stop watching when Jack starts to wax exstatic on the wonders of Astro Glide.

    5. Re:So cool by Simulant · · Score: 1

      This is what happens when people get Tivos. Get used to it.

  39. Noise... by deragon · · Score: 1

    I notice that the Xbox has a fan... How much noise does this box generate? What is the impact of this noise in a living room?

    I am looking a way to reduce noise on my home computer. Downclocking the CPU and such so I can remove fans. Does anybody know of an external powersupply with no fan on it (bigger foot print for dissipating heat)? A bit like the C64 power supply?

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    1. Re:Noise... by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I think this article pretty much summed it up.

  40. One way ticket ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    You can have PC knowledge but that means we can be arrested as soon as you enter the US. Is that the risk worth hacking a gamebox?

    Being on a blacklist until you come in the US so feds can crawl up your body to cuff and hold you for x(xx) days?

    naaaah ..
    I wish to be "free" to enter any country without those pesky rules of reverse engineering etc.., and, btw a criminal record of "hacking a gamebox" looks bad on your cv :o))

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    1. Re:One way ticket ... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      You can have PC knowledge but that means we can be arrested as soon as you enter the US. Is that the risk worth hacking a gamebox?

      Why would you want to go to the US anyway? Would you really want to go to a country where you can be arrested for opening up a console? Or even one where you can be arrested for having a drink or smoking a joint? The US is the last place any right-minded person would want to go.

    2. Re:One way ticket ... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      As far as i know alot of other countries have similar alcohol and drug laws...not that i agree with them, but we are certainly not the only ones..

    3. Re:One way ticket ... by rking · · Score: 1

      You can have PC knowledge but that means we can be arrested as soon as you enter the US. Is that the risk worth hacking a gamebox?

      What risk? The chance that you'll inadvertently visit the USA? It's not the sort of possibility that keeps me awake worrying at night.

      Being on a blacklist until you come in the US so feds can crawl up your body to cuff and hold you for x(xx) days?

      I think you're really out of touch with reality. "Until" I come to America??? Like that's something everyone does eventually?

      naaaah ..
      I wish to be "free" to enter any country without those pesky rules of reverse engineering etc.., and, btw a criminal record of "hacking a gamebox" looks bad on your cv :o))


      Well changing your behaviour in advance on the off chance that you might want to visit some country might pass for "free" in America. It sounds thoroughly chained to me.

      I guess you're constantly closeted with a team of lawyers saying "so, if I do this will it cause problems if I ever visit Crete? How about Zimbabwe? Cuba?...."

    4. Re:One way ticket ... by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      Actually the world seems to be swinging in the other direction. The first cannabis cafe has opened in England since they reformed their drug law in regards to marijuana.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    5. Re:One way ticket ... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, i forgot that b/c England does something, that means that the entire world is also doing it. So how long before the rest of the world puts the steering wheels in cars on the right side? By your logic thats where the rest of the world is heading..

    6. Re:One way ticket ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you won't come to America, we'll call you a terrorist and send special forces to your flat to arrest you.

    7. Re:One way ticket ... by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      That was only *one* example you ass. I don't have time to do all your research for you. They got this new thing called the 'internet'. You should check it out. There is no shame in not knowing something.

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
    8. Re:One way ticket ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      What risk? The chance that you'll inadvertently visit the USA? It's not the sort of possibility that keeps me awake worrying at night.

      the risk to be held at a airport because of breaking the DMCA ?

      I think you're really out of touch with reality. "Until" I come to America??? Like that's something everyone does eventually?

      I have been there for almost a year and see a possibility that it could happen again ....


      I guess you're constantly closeted with a team of lawyers saying "so, if I do this will it cause problems if I ever visit Crete? How about
      Zimbabwe? Cuba?...."


      I am not closeted with a team of lawyers though I did see problems arising (with me) already with laws in Europe not to mention about the US.

      I do not even wish to be closeted with a team of lawyers, for privacy and freedom!

      how "legal" is opening an XBOX or making a emulator these days? ...

      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    9. Re:One way ticket ... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Well i did do some searching on google, and you know what. I found lots of debates about the idea, but no laws being changed. Pot and crack are in slightly different categories, i know of alot of people against the idea of any legalized drugs (not the medical kind, mind you). As far as i know know, the US is putting pressure on other countries (such as columbia) to clean up thier act.

  41. Plex86 ! by tempmpi · · Score: 1

    A software like plex86 could solve these problems. It scans the code before it is executed and can virtualize even ring0 code. AGP gets faster every day and could be used to emulate the shared ram of the xbox. I'm sure that it is possible to run X-Box games on a pc without full emulation.
    But on the other hand I think it will much easier to run pc software on the xbox. The only thing missing is a real pc standard bios. A VGA mode is maybe missing but that shouldn't be a large problem. I think it will take less than a month before we will see the first screenshots of linux running on the xbox. Or it will never happend because kernel hackers don't want to touch anything made by microsoft.

    --
    Jan
  42. Port the software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CAn you copy the system to a normal pc?
    Then you could make your own

  43. i dunno.... by doktorjayd · · Score: 1

    X in console format??

    .. snortsnort....

  44. XBOX harder to hack than you think by voronoi++ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some info:

    1) XBox will only boot from layer 2 of a DVD
    2) The bios is held encrypted in the nv2a
    3) IIRC the dvd drive isn't a normal one.
    4) There is meant to be all sorts of encryption built into the hardware.
    5) I think there are monitering routines to detect code tampering at run time.
    6) The network stack is encrypted.
    7) There is a custom disk format i.e. not fat32.
    etc...

    It will probably be cracked eventually, but I doubt we will be seeing linux on it any time soon...

    1. Re:XBOX harder to hack than you think by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

      There is a custom disk format i.e. not fat32

      So ... is it reiserfs or ext3?

    2. Re:XBOX harder to hack than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FBSD UFS with softupdates :)

    3. Re:XBOX harder to hack than you think by morgue-ann · · Score: 2, Informative

      2) The bios is held encrypted in the nv2a

      So why is there one of these on the motherboard? (possible datasheet )

      Here's a slightly better picture than the one in the article. The chip to the right and a little up from [4] appears to be an Intel Strataflash of a pretty small size -- a 32 or 40 pin TSOP, good for only 2megabytes. The fact that it might be only 8 bits wide shouldn't matter because the ROM copies itself to RAM on bootup (Flash is slooooow).

      Also, this claims the ROM contains FAT32 and UDFS filesytem code. Not that it matters 'cause I plan to set the xbox's hard drive aside & put in one with a real filesystem (yes, ext3fs) anyway.

      I do believe that the ROM will only boot code from a signed DVD, but I also believe that ROM is replaceable.

    4. Re:XBOX harder to hack than you think by Jodka · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether all the claims made about XBox encryption are true, but even if they are, the XBox encrytpion is more a nuisance than a serious technical barrier to porting other OSes such as Linux and the BSDs to the XBox.

      That the BIOS is encrypted, that the network stack is encrypted, bla bla bla, none of this matters to Linux, which has no use for the native Xbox drivers and would certainly supplant those with its own drivers. Even code-tampering detection routines could likely be sidestepped, unless they are implemented with hardware interrupts which execute routines in soldered-on ROM. (And that oes not seem likely, because any validation rule which rejected changes to the system code would reject MS firmware updates.)

      Getting at the drivers isn't a bad idea though. Using Microsoft's XBOX binaries to deduce the Xbox hardware configuration could be quite helpul. But those binaries must be accessible because not ALL of the software on the box can be encrypted. Somewhere, there must be an unencrypted decryption routine which loads and decodes the encrypted code.

      While XBOX encryption can not be an impregnable technical barrier, it is a serious legal barrier. The DMCA prevents hackers from legally passing around the tools to decrypt Xbox binaries. And copyright law prevents you from passing around the binaries themselves. So its going to be impossible to legally use the Xbox binaries do deduce things like register locations on custom chips. For the non-custom chips with published specs, just find the base address and you know the rest.

      But I'm wondering, could hackers in non-DMCA countries reverse-engineer the hardware from the MS Xbox binaries, publish what they discover about the hardware, and the rest of us poor oppressed DMCA-governed folks then legally use what they've discovered to write Linux or BSD drivers ?

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    5. Re:XBOX harder to hack than you think by Wesley+Everest · · Score: 1
      While XBOX encryption can not be an impregnable technical barrier, it is a serious legal barrier. The DMCA prevents hackers from legally passing around the tools to decrypt Xbox binaries. And copyright law prevents you from passing around the binaries themselves. So its going to be impossible to legally use the Xbox binaries do deduce things like register locations on custom chips. For the non-custom chips with published specs, just find the base address and you know the rest.

      IANAL, but I don't think the DMCA forbids creating, posessing, and using a tool. I'm pretty sure it just covers distributing the tool (though it's still up in the air if courts will consider source code "a device" under the DMCA). And copyright law allows fair use -- just as you can use quotes from a movie or song, it should be legal to disassemble short parts of the binaries and distribute those as part of an article about how the XBox works.

      I think the trouble would come from trade secret laws, since I'm sure MS would claim every tiny bit of code is a trade secret, and the law forbids distributing a trade secret without permission from the owner. I don't think reverse engineering and sharing the info is actually illegal, since I don't that information is legally a trade secret, but that's never stopped multi-billionaires from suing people into the ground.
    6. Re:XBOX harder to hack than you think by nixman99 · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether all the claims made about XBox encryption are true, but even if they are, the XBox encrytpion is more a nuisance than a serious technical barrier to porting other OSes such as Linux and the BSDs to the XBox.

      But how much work are you going to have to do just to save a couple hundred USD in hardware? Micro$oft doesn't have to make hacking the XBOX impossible, just uneconomical.

    7. Re:XBOX harder to hack than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. And we don't have to worry about internet attacks because those are hard to figure out.

    8. Re:XBOX harder to hack than you think by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      Trade secret law only protects against misappropriation of trade secrets- getting them through theft, fraud or violating a confidentiality agreement.

      Reverse engineering, has generally not been held to qualify as "improper means" because even though it might be pretty damn hard to get at them, the ideas are "generally available."

      However, there's a case when a company took aerial photographs of a DuPont chemical plant under construction & it was considered improper means. If the MS-BIOS is encrypted, there may be a stronger case for improper-ness. However, I believe that the DVDs are digitally signed and the BIOS is not encrypted, though I wouldn't be surprised if they did something simple like scramble the address lines.

      A shrink wrap license was (controversially) upheld in the CyberPatrol (Mattel) case. I don't think the Xbox has one of those.

    9. Re:XBOX harder to hack than you think by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. It's not that we're saving a couple hundred, it's that we're also cause Microsoft to LOSE a couple hundred. On every unit. Buy multiple units and save! Save! Save!

      This could really explode in MS's face, so expect massive legal battles, FUD, etc. the minute details become readily available.

      Because, remember, the only way MS can make money is if you buy XBox titles and peripherals. If you just buy the system, they're in the hole, and if you never buy anything else, they'll never make up the cost.

      --

      Moof!

  45. but when will MS release a Linux Kit for it? by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 1, Troll

    Like Sony is going to for the Playstation? (and did in Japan already)
    BTW, anyone know when the Harddrive/Broadband adaptor will be available in the US?

    See MS can't do a Linux Kit for Xbox because although it's just a gaming console, it is produced by the Evil Empire who has alterior motives relating to trying to TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!!! everything they make has some hint of that evil plan in it, it all makes me feel so sick.

    Even if you'd like to get an Xbox to hack because you know it is sold at a loss, you become a barganing chip to entice support for the XboX known as installed userbase. MS would never let it be known that 50% of Xbox'es ended up running Linux and being used as PC's, they's just say :-)"we have 50 Million Xbox's in living rooms now make some games for it":-)

    Evil evil evil....don't buy into the evil empire.

    1. Re:but when will MS release a Linux Kit for it? by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Rumor places the HD/BBA releases in the first quarter 2002, in time for Final Fantasy X, which will require the Hard Drive. ps2.ign.com pegs FFX's release as January 2002. We'll see.

      You can buy a USB e-net adaptor right now; unfortunately, the only game that can take advantage of it yet is Tony Hawk 3. Supposedly FFXI will be utilizing the BBA, as well as an upcoming game called SOCOM, with a release date of February 14th, 2002.

      So I'd peg the BBA release as early next year.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    2. Re:but when will MS release a Linux Kit for it? by WyrdOne · · Score: 0

      Tribes 2 for PS2 and Unreal Tournament for PS2 can and will take advantage of the BBA and HD for the PS2. I just wish they had written support for firewire harddrives and USB network adapters. (take up a memory card space for driver storage like the upgraded firmware that comes with Sony's DVD remote).

  46. Cracking open the box by Efg� · · Score: 1, Funny

    Instead of going all this trouble to crack open an Xbox, the should just ship it via UPS...

  47. shouldn't be long for an emu. by Sentry23 · · Score: 1

    Especially since no direct hardware access is alowed, according to MS coding standards. (seems they are covering themselves for future upgrades).
    Al hardware access is done with an API, so things like the shared memory model are only a performance issue, not a portability issue.
    (It has to be an API, since its running a streamlined 2K kernel anyway).

    But looking at these pics, i think the other way around will be much more fun.
    Trying to make it run non Xbox x86 code.
    The main problem will be any copyright/freakers protection they must have put in the system to prevent this.
    I couldnt see any socketed ROMs in the picture, so the ultra easy way is off. Is there any way to 'listen in' to the data dat is being transferred from the DVD to the MoBo (with split cables etc etc)?
    I'm not aware of this kind of tool, but if i can think it up, somebody must have made it.
    There must be some sort of handshake going on to determine if its a bootable program in there, that is made for Xbox. If that could be cracked, sky would be the limit for messing around with the Xbox.
    Ofcourse you could save yourself the trouble and just get an second hand PC for half the price of an Xbox to play with.

    Sentry23
    -no brain, no pain

    1. Re:shouldn't be long for an emu. by Znork · · Score: 2

      I can imagine a pretty profitable buisness model based on letting MS subsidize the hardware for compute clusters based on the XBox. I suspect that would be a nightmare for them too.

    2. Re:shouldn't be long for an emu. by TheMoog · · Score: 2, Informative
      Especially since no direct hardware access is alowed, according to MS coding standards. (seems they are covering themselves for future upgrades).

      That's just plain untrue; developers have full access to the components that matter (i.e. the graphics and sound processors). Those that aren't time-critical, such as the HD and network card are driven by the kernel in BIOS. So MS can upgrade them to cheaper components as time goes by without breaking games. There is no plan for 'future upgrades'.
      Al hardware access is done with an API, so things like the shared memory model are only a performance issue, not a portability issue.
      (It has to be an API, since its running a streamlined 2K kernel anyway).

      Xbox runs in RING0 all the time, so game code can poke the hardware as much as it likes...the 'API' you mention is as thin as possible and can be bypassed directly.
      There must be some sort of handshake going on to determine if its a bootable program in there, that is made for Xbox. If that could be cracked, sky would be the limit for messing around with the Xbox.

      Yup; but you'll be lucky to get past the crypotographically signed data going back and forth; you'd have to sign all the data with Microsoft's key first...good luck there.

      Where the heck are you getting your 'information' from - you don't appear to have a clue what you're talking about.

    3. Re:shouldn't be long for an emu. by Sentry23 · · Score: 1

      Apologies then.
      The person who told me should know, since he is a developer, but hearing your comments, I relied on (deliberate?) false information.
      I guess that even developers can be biased.

      Sentry23
      -
      trust no-one

    4. Re:shouldn't be long for an emu. by TheMoog · · Score: 1

      Fair play there; my information is based on the fact that I've been developing an Xbox title for over a year. Tell your developer friend to read the docs!

  48. Hackin' and moanin'... by FleshWound · · Score: 0, Troll

    I wonder how long it will take for people to start hacking the crap out of their XBoxen, and then start bitching and moaning about how much MS sucks because all their games start crashing.

    1. Re:Hackin' and moanin'... by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

      Unless my eyes deceive me, the "bitching and moaning about how much MS sucks" is already in full effect, way ahead of your schedule. I find great irony in the fact that the same people that say "anything Microsoft makes is evil and stupid and will crash" are the same people that see no problem with hacking it and putting Linux on it. So it's ok to support MS by buying their product, as long as I throw away all their hard work on OS and games, and use it to .. umm .. surf for porn.

      Having used mine for a day, I think it's a great console, which is exactly what it's designed to be. Perhaps if some of the zealots could relax for a second, they could have some fun with it as well.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    2. Re:Hackin' and moanin'... by FleshWound · · Score: 1

      It's a shame that you can't post on an article in which you moderate, because I'd really like to know what the assclown that modded me down to troll was thinking when he did that, or, on the more probable side of things, why he wasn't thinking at all.

    3. Re:Hackin' and moanin'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not very long. I've seen people bitch about a game crashing all the time and when you ask them about their system they'll say it's an overclocked AMD. Some folks are clueless.

  49. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At home I have Next Generation magazine's console gaming timeline, from the early 70's Telstars up to the last gen (N64 et al).
    I pointed out earlier, on a different thread, (and not at work :) to somebody who was whining about new consoles not coming out all the time that 90% of the time, console generations last 5 years. As well they should: it gives developers enough time to get used to the hardware and develop sequels. Look at the last batch of Playstation games compared to what came out with the console: the difference is *incredible*

  50. doh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you've all overlooked the obvious.

    WHO IS WORKING ON THE NETBSD PORT?

  51. xbox versus gamecube versus ps2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    X-Box - Direct3D
    GameCube - OpenGL
    PlayStation 2 - Proprietary

    Get a GameCube as it's the only one supporting open standards.

    1. Re:xbox versus gamecube versus ps2 by TheMoog · · Score: 1

      How about just getting the one with the best games on it?

    2. Re:xbox versus gamecube versus ps2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you buy an xbox, it costs Microsoft about $100, which they'll never get back unless you then buy some games... so the more xboxes we buy, the more money they lose! I'm tempted to buy one just for the hell of it, and use it for a doorstop.

    3. Re:xbox versus gamecube versus ps2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and then you lose a few hundred dollars on a door stop. You are a moron.

  52. Chilly reception by nutznboltz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to the Washington Post the xbox failed to sell out completely like other consoles have. Seems many people were waiting for the GameCube instead.

    1. Re:Chilly reception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch! After all the hype and marketing, thats quite an embarassment. If I were at one of those game companies, I'd be thinking twice about making games for this lemon.

  53. like economy pcs? by Juln · · Score: 1

    Really cheap PCs have a shared memory architecture, also. The video ram is shared with the main system ram.
    Many PCs do work like that and it is simply a cheap way of doing things, not a significat difference at all.

    --
    Juln
    1. Re:like economy pcs? by irix · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not just Economy PCs - you can use this architecture to to do much more than that

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  54. Gee, that took awhile... by leonbev · · Score: 2

    I'm disappointed! It took a whole DAY for someone to disassemble an XBOX, and post pictures on the web for everyone to see? What took so long?!?

    At this slow pace, it might take over a MONTH to get a custom Linux distribution running on it!

    Come on guys, hurry up! I had my heart set on building an XBOX web server running Apache before Christmas.

    1. Re:Gee, that took awhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There could have been pictures of the XBox on The Screen Savers awhile ago. Another show on TechTV is Extended Play and they had the XBox for a couple of weeks now.
      Only problem is I don't think MS would like them showing pics(and I'm sure MS is talking to the TechTV lawyers). But the real reason Patrick Norton(The Screen Savers) didn't do this awhile ago is because Kate Botello(Extended Play) would have kicked his you know what.

  55. DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha, they (TECHTV) can probably be sued under the DMCA now....

  56. pop-ups by guinsu · · Score: 1, Troll

    If this is a tech site, why the hell are all the images javascript popups instead of links. That is so annoying. You think they'd know better.

    1. Re:pop-ups by guinsu · · Score: 2

      And how is this a troll, I think this is a legit complaint for people surfing with ad blocking proxies, lynx and other browsers.

  57. Right Idea, Wrong Target by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    You're right that you couldn't build a PC with XBox specifications for less than the cost of an XBox, but that's not likely to be the goal for most of us. The more likely target is to answer the question, "what PC hardware do I need at a minimum so that I can run an XBox emulator and play XBox games without buying an XBox?"

    Virg

  58. Kinda stupid... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

    ...I mean, I can build a cheap PC with all that crap for less than the asking price of an Xbox.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Kinda stupid... by Juju · · Score: 1

      Really, where?!? How? Just being curious...

      --
      Black holes occur when God divides by zero.
    2. Re:Kinda stupid... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2
      (all prices quoted from pricewatch.com)

      AMD Duron 700 and motherboard combo, with CPU heatsink and fan: $79

      64 MB SDRAM (I shit you not): $1 (hell, let's get 2.)

      NVidia GeForce2 GTS (yes, it's no GeForce 3, but we're looking for a cluster computer, so do we even need something this expensive?): $65

      20 GB hard disk: $63

      System case (400W ATX): $20

      D-Link DFE-530TX 10/100 ethernet (something name-brand-ish): $9

      So, minus shipping, we have a $238 700 MHz system, well below the price of an XBox and infinitely more configurable.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    3. Re:Kinda stupid... by Scopedog · · Score: 1

      Ok lets be REALISTIC here.. To have a reliable PC for under $300 with the SAME specs as the x-box is almost impossible. Fine if you want to quote pricewatch then lets do it:

      Intel 733: $85
      Motherboard: Intel $39
      GeForce 3: $192
      20 Gig HD: $63
      DVD Drive: $35
      Case: ??*
      NIC: 3com 10/100 $25

      *now i can safely assume that a $20 is as cheap in quality as they get, and the X-Box case is alot better

      All this adds up to $439 without the case. How is this cheaper than $300? Remember Microsoft is taking a HUGE hit in price here, selling the x-box for 300 bucks. If they figure out how to hack it then its a steal to buy one.

    4. Re:Kinda stupid... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

      You're also assuming they pay retail for their parts. You really think Intel is charging them $85 per chip and $39 per board? A built-in GeForce 3 is certainly going to cost less, per-chip, than an AGP board.

      I was just showing you could build a comparable box for distributed network computing for much less than the XBox's cost, not a high-end gaming rig.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    5. Re:Kinda stupid... by rekoil · · Score: 1

      Kinda true - in fact, it wouldn't surprise me if MS themselves release an emulator. That way they can make money off the games without having to lose money on the console sale.

      Although, honestly, I doubt MS is paying retail fo the parts, so they're not losing $139 on each unit either...

    6. Re:Kinda stupid... by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      I've got to imagine that those prices have at least a 25% markup, which puts the cost of that system right around the $300 mark.
      Ad a case and an overpriced controller....

      also, its not a full geforce 3, the hd is 6-8? gigs?

      use some creative accounting and M$ clout...how are they losing money on these things?

    7. Re:Kinda stupid... by Scopedog · · Score: 1

      Ahh ok...well then if your talking about distributed network computing then why compare your budget home made pc with an xbox? The xbox was designed more for gaming than anything(I would think the graphics end of this machine is the most expensive part, thus the price of the machine), but if hacked could do alot more(hopefully one day). Of course Microsoft isn't paying retail prices for the hardware, you mentioned pricewatch so i went with that. But you are right, these days you can build a pretty damn fast machine for pennies..

    8. Re:Kinda stupid... by Scopedog · · Score: 1

      Hmm..well i've been reading that it costs $580+ to manufacture each system. Thats a big loss, if you sell them for $300. I'm sure your aware that video game companies take losses on the hardware and make money selling the software(as in the ps2..when first released they were $390 to manufacture but they sold them for $300). Consoles do not make these companies money. Not sure if that $580/per is true..but i do think microsoft is losing money on hardware.

    9. Re:Kinda stupid... by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      crap...just realized that $300 is the retail price on the box....the retailers probably pay less than that, which means M$ gets less....unless they are selling these things at cost expecting to make up for it on games and accessories...and extended warrenties...can't forget those...

      will someone who knows anything about the retail/wholesale costs of these things please post something?

    10. Re:Kinda stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, going around calling yourself "Wakko Warner" is what's fucking stupid. Grow up, move out of your parents home, and get rid of the Underoos for Christ's sake. I bet you're 30 years old and have never kissed a girl not related to you.

  59. There is already software for XBox (censorware!) by Dave21212 · · Score: 1

    This from good 'ol News.com

    Software maker Trilogy Studios said it plans to release a home "censorware" product that will cut scenes and language from DVDs to create PG versions of R-rated movies.

    The company, which launched a new Web site last week, said it plans to unveil its Movie Mask DVD player by the first quarter of 2002. The software works on PCs and Microsoft's Xbox game console, telling the device to skip over specific frames in the film that portray violence, profanity or nudity. The company said the DVD remains unaffected, since the censorship instructions reside in the video playback device.

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  60. running linux... by geoff+lane · · Score: 1
    Nobody seems to pointed out that so long as the program running on the xbox has been developed to the xbox code standards it can be ANYTHING.

    Including a hacked version of the user level linux kernel.....

    Most games avoid OS services anyway to gain speed (and lets face it directx is just a way to do this in a controlled manner.) so games and operating system kernels have much in common :-)

  61. Heritage. by saintlupus · · Score: 1

    I think the Xbox could become what CD32 and CDI were trying to become.

    Oh, and the Pippin. Way to innovate from another failed Apple product, Bill.

    --saint

  62. Re:There is already software for XBox (censorware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile the Paper Street Software Company has recently announced plans for the Tyler Durdan DVD player which will randomly insert single frames of pronography into family films...

  63. The XBox is Imploding! by bryanbrunton · · Score: 1

    Anyone seen other reports that XBox is having hardware problems?

    This report at The Inquirer suggests that the XBox launch could be more of a self-destruct.

    In the future perhaps Microsoft will include one of their illegal EULAs and prevent the return/refund of the XBox.

  64. XBox freezing by PimpNasty · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine who works at Target has already had to remove power from the XBox to get it to reset after it froze up.

    --
    - Pimp

    I like computers, women and computers... in that order...
    1. Re:XBox freezing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is this due to bad hardware, or just the bad software?

  65. Javascript Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning: This site requires Javascript

  66. OT: browser flame by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    TechTV's not particulary standards-compliant site that crashed Konq on me once

    Although I'm probably more of an "HTML Nazi" than most Slashdotters, I wish people wouldn't flame websites for their browsers crashing. Regardless of how bad their HTML is, calling it "nonstandard" pales in comparison to the nonstandardness of the web browser itself. Because, you see, one of the most basic standards of all software is: a program shouldn't crash when it is given bad input.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  67. Don't forget nVidia.... by TonyZahn · · Score: 1

    If you really wanted a duplicate of this machine, you would need a motherboard based on nVidia's nForce chipset (I know it only supports AMD). Then you'd want to use DDR Ram (I'm sure the XBox isn't using SDR, maybe rambus?), and a GeForce3 (just to have the same gfx hardware). You wouldn't need a sound card, just use the sound on the nForce board, same with the network card.

    --
    - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
    1. Re:Don't forget nVidia.... by TheMoog · · Score: 1
      The Xbox uses DDR RAM, and it's GPU is significantly altered from a vanilla GeForce III, for a start it has two copies of the transformation engine running in parallel, so can transform twice as many vertices than your PC's GF3.

      Of course, over time that'll change - I don't think anyone except MS and NVidia could tell you what agreements they have about delaying the PC equivalent stuff. Maybe that's why the nForce chipset is AMD only, praps MS made them sign away the rights to their equivalent Intel chipset (ie the Xbox mainboard)

    2. Re:Don't forget nVidia.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nvidia nForce chipset uses AMD because Nvidia doesn't have a license to interface to the proprietary PIII bus interface (the same reason AMD isn't pin compatible to PIII). However, it so happens that Microsoft had a license to make motherboards with Intel chips (apparently from past efforts when MS was considering going into hardware), so for Microsoft, Nvidia was able to make a PIII version of nForce.

      Microsoft was going to use AMD until a frantic Intel lowballed the PIIIs so much, that Microsoft had to go for it (and AMD refused to match the price).

      The PIII that the Xbox uses is like a Celeron/PIII hybrid. It has all PIII instruction set (SSE), but the Celerons small 128KB cache.

      If you used an Athlon XP which has SSE extensions, there probably would be few app level processor differences.

  68. Re:Dude, you are insensitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am shocked and appalled. Patrick Norton is so *not* fat. But I could be biased, since I watch the Screensavers religiously, and he is my god.

  69. My point exactly! by Juju · · Score: 1
    Thanks.

    For a home system, with linux this is really good. Just add a little USB keyboard and you get yourself a very cheap system with a good 3D card, excellent sound, DVD...

    Even the Beowulf argument makes sense if you compare the price you would have to get the boxes from DELL. Remeber, the stuff that goes in there is cheap but you still have to assemble it. And look at how little place the stuff takes.

    --
    Black holes occur when God divides by zero.
  70. Vampire Video sux0rz.... by MsGeek · · Score: 1
    Basically, what it comes down to is the Xbox has the shared memory architecture, and the PC does not. That is, there is no video card RAM on the Xbox, there is no system RAM on the Xbox, there is just 'RAM' on the Xbox.

    OMG...that is absolutely horrible. SHARED RAM POOL!!! Have you ever had to deal with shared video? It's usually a Very Bad Idea (tm). I have had to deal with Intel 810 shared video, and it is slow, sluggish...UGH!

    How does M$ think it's going to be able to compete with game boxes that give their video subsystems dedicated RAM?

    I'd like to have a little pinch of what Gates et al are smoking...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Vampire Video sux0rz.... by Glonk · · Score: 1

      Well, having shared memory allows the developers to allocate memory according to the needs of the game. Say it needs 32MB of space for the level design, etc? Done. You can use 32MB of Video RAM now. What if you want 48MB of Video RAM? Done.

      Then there's also the fact that the GPU chip gets 6.4GB/s of bandwidth thanks to shared memory, while the PS2/Gamecube each get 3.2GB/s to their video RAM...

  71. wait a minute... by glwtta · · Score: 1

    ...a CD-ROM, a mobo, a CPU AND an HD?? why, I've never seen anything like it! ;)

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  72. NON Standard Connecters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what i can tell by looking at the pics, the wiring for the connecters are bassackwords (only the wiring/connecters look standard for the Hdd tho)

    Looks like it has a VIA or other non-intel chipset and a Seagate Hdd.

    Looks like an easy hack tho.

  73. XBox Divx home-player .. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given these facts:
    CPU: PIII 733 MHz
    GPU: nVidia 250 MHz (XGPU custom chip!)
    RAM: 64 MB DDR
    HDD: 10 Gb
    Audio: ?
    I/O: HDD-interface + 4x USB

    http://gear.ign.com/articles/306618p1.html

    It will managage Divx video. Question is if that GPU is supported by Xfree86?, or how difficult it would be to make it work.

    Also any expansion possibilities besides USB?, Hidden PCI interface somewhere..?,

    Wonder if that HDD interface is IDE or SCSI.. well I suspect IDE but you never know =)

  74. NEVER in the United States of America by erroneus · · Score: 2

    You do know that there are other countries than the US where people do have PC knowledge. The DMCA does not apply to these countries. Also, how many reverse-engineer projects do you think has been discontinued or never started due to the DMCA??
    I'm guessing zero!!


    Yeah, I'll give you that much it can be shown that they can never come to visit U.S. soil without fear of prosecution.

  75. Some laptops use shared memory like this. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    The older Sony Vaios do it.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  76. Xbox is a virus... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    Xbox is a virus, which seems can infect anything, even subway turnstiles...

  77. Please don't feed the Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..from Redmond.
    If you are for linux then do not rationalize buying
    an X Box.

  78. Re:XBox freezing - The Solution! by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft has addressed the problem of constant and continuous freezing. As can be noted in the illustrated disection of the XBox, you will see multiple fans placed within the chassis. You will also notice that there appears to be a heat-related device placed upon one of the chips on the main board.

    Given that the machine's outter chassis doesn't lend itself easily to the free flow of air through the chassis, then surely, the fans are used to distribute the air within the chassis itself. If that is the case, which I believe is true, then the air passing over the heat-related device affixed to one of the system's chips is then warmed and distributed within the chassis.

    This would give the effect of evenly distributed warming within the chassis of the XBox device and thereby ambiguously warming any device within the XBox that is otherwise prone to freezing.

    I have heard that if the problem perisists that Microsoft will supply a service-pack module (for $150) that strangely resembles a George Foreman grill. You are expected to mount the XBox within the service-pack module. The service-pack module is to be pre-heated a minimum of two minutes prior to game play.

    At first note, it might appear to be objectionable that a user would have to wait such a long time for "pre-heating." However, Microsoft recommends hand-stretching exercises during this time period to help reduce the adverse effects of using their game controller.

    So you see, it all comes together rather harmoniously in the end.

    Long live XBox!

  79. Another motherboard pic by morcheeba · · Score: 2

    I found this scan of a motherboard pic through google images. funxbox.com no longer has the picture referenced on their page (let me guess why, oh, maybe blatent ripoff from some magazine), but the image is still there.

    Interesting: this older picture shows all of the ram populated, no seperate fan on the graphics chip (I guess they added it due to overheating problems or paranoia), and only 1/2 of the flash populated. The new pictures don't show the second flash site, so I can't tell if its still the same.

    This older picture has a small key showing what's what on the board. Does anyone know which magazine it came from?

    1. Re:Another motherboard pic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks familiar. Can't check right now but it looks to be from Wired a month or so ago.

      ac

    2. Re:Another motherboard pic by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks- it looks like it's from this this wired 9.05 story. The web version doesn't include the picture.

    3. Re:Another motherboard pic by p_pp_n · · Score: 1
      Legend from image transcribed by wetware OCR
      1. Nvidia's Xbox GPU, based on the ,.. an extra-large fan and heat sink to cool it.
      2. Intel's Pentium III, running at 7xx Mhz, also topped by a heat sink.
      3. 64 Mbytes of RAM
      4. The Xbox MCP, nVidia's Media Communications Processor, gnerats 256 independent sound channels in stereoa or 64 in 3-D
      5. IDE connector, which links the DVD-ROM drive and and 8-Gbyte hard drive (whiche have been removed for this picture) to the bus
      6. 100-Mbit ethernet port, for direct communications to cable modem, DSL or other XZCV.
      7. TV encoder; Reportedlt a Y chip style censorship device will be somewhere on the circuit board, asdfvasdfv built into the TV-encoder, asdfsadf in software Microso asdcda specifically asdff adsf w parental,..
  80. Te-HE TV by rela · · Score: 1
    {flame:Every time I forget how stupid tech-tv is, something comes along to remind me. Like these LOVELY ACTION SHOTS OF A BEER BELLY GUY PULLING SCREWS! Gods, just photograph the hardware and leave the gut and 'athlon killing hands' out of it.}

    So how long till someone cuts windows in the case with neon lights, installs water cooling, overclocks it, and installs linux? =)

  81. Re:*Yawn* - i810 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a thought. It would be interesting to see if an agp-part hack in Linux using the intel i810 chipset would be possible. Doesn't the i810 carve off a peice of system memory for use as graphics buffer exclusive to the graphics controller. Might an enterprising hacker find a way to manipulate this memory with the cpu.

    I don't know much about the i810 other than it sucks. But similar integrated chipsets may also provide for interesting play if this is possible.

    Just a thought.

  82. I dunno about buying it on eBay.. by gatesh8r · · Score: 2, Funny
    Uncle Bill says that if it is off of eBay it's probably pirated, and I don't want a pirated X-Box... I'm going to be a good boy and overpay for it at a department store! That way I can check the holographic inside of the box to make sure it's genuine!!!

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
    1. Re:I dunno about buying it on eBay.. by BlueJay465 · · Score: 1

      um....check your numbers, the prices coming off eBay are FAAAR higher than the retail price.

    2. Re:I dunno about buying it on eBay.. by gatesh8r · · Score: 1

      This is true, but in case you couldn't see the sarcasm, it's moreso about some "other" product M$ has... which shall go unnamed

      --
      Karma whorin' since 1999
  83. Yeah, except... by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    Microsoft and Co. are trying to tell you that this is beneficial to the X-Box somehow. For some reason, this seems vaguely similar to the N-Force hardware.

    Hmm... Molex connectors, IDE cables, standard computer PSU unit. A very standard-looking CPU. Thank you Mr. Patrick Norton. You just gave me all of the answers that I wanted. That is why I like your show.

  84. The *REAL* logo for MicroSoft's Xbox.. by jhesse · · Score: 1
    --

    --
    "I have also mastered pomposity, even if I do say so myself." -Kryten
  85. Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It baffles me how some people on slashdot hate Microsoft for stifling competion and then hates them when they try to promote it. How can more competition in the game console market be bad? It will likely only shorten console life cycles and lead to more companies putting lots of time and energy in high quality games and accesories. How can this be bad for the consumer? Frankly, I'm glad someone has lit a fire under Sony's ass and it's up to them to make the next move.

    1. Re:Xbox by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

      what about nentendo are they not a valid competitor in the consol market?

  86. Item of note... by The1Genius · · Score: 1

    One thing I found humourous as I flipped through the TechTV photos was the warning on the outside of the box about opening it, and then once they did open it, the number of stickers insode with warnings and information that "technically" shouldn't be required if end users paid any attention to the outer sticker...

    --
    The1Genius - Littera Scripta Manet
  87. Impressive by krmt · · Score: 2

    Wow, that's pretty amazing. You couldn't have just hit the mute button on the TV and played them on your stereo instead? And you could have saved money overall by buying a couple of fat memory cards rather than paying for the hard drive.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    1. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for all the other sound effects and stuff included in the game.

      ... and the other things they wanted to do with the hard drive, like downloadable games.

      Better luck next time.

    2. Re:Impressive by krmt · · Score: 2

      Most games come with sound controls, so you can turn off the music or sound effects as you choose. Turn off their music, play yours on the stereo. Save space and cash.

      As for downloadable games, sure... but how often do we even do that now with the PC? I don't know anyone who downloads software off a site and pays for it rather than going down to the store or ordering the boxed version. The only thing you really download are patches and expansion maps/packs. I sure as hell don't want to be patching my console games, and I doubt anyone else does either. Expansions could be nice though.

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    3. Re:Impressive by erasmus_ · · Score: 1

      I know what you're saying, and of course there are other ways around it. But it's not the same, if you think about it. Let me give you an example in Project Gotham racing. Here I have a couple great tracks, and they start exactly when the race starts. You can even make them into user radio, and DJs in the game that are located in the city that you're racing will talk over the beginning and end of the track. It's random and synched to the game. I really found myself enjoying this feature, and I can't be the only one.

      Hard drives are not that expensive, so I'm not buying that part of your argument, and there'll be a ton more uses for it. I stand by my argument.

      --
      Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
  88. For gawd's sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    At this slow pace, it might take over a MONTH to get a custom Linux distribution running on it!

    If this is all you can think about, how to port linux over to the Xbox, your parent's toaster or the family cat, sounds like you seriously need to get a life.

  89. As good a time as any.. by Danse · · Score: 1

    I've been curious about this. I often hear the argument from overclockers that even though getting Q3 to run at 170fps doesn't make any real difference than running it at 80fps, the difference comes when things get busy and your framerate gets cut in half. If you're running at 80fps, then you could get dropped to 30 or 40 momentarily, while if you're running at 170, you may get dropped down to 80 or so and it would still be quite playable. Now I'm wondering if this is actually true, or if there is more going on than that, what actual difference would it make?

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    1. Re:As good a time as any.. by seann · · Score: 1

      But if you got enough power to do 80fps
      and things get busy
      if things get busy
      why the heck would you drop?
      you have all that power.

      FPS= 180
      you blow up a star
      FPS= 80
      --
      FPS=80
      you blow up a star
      FPS=50
      --
      Why not instead set a limit of what you can do (say 80) and always have it 80 (since seeing anything more than 80 is a waste of our eyes).

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    2. Re:As good a time as any.. by Danse · · Score: 1

      Why not instead set a limit of what you can do (say 80) and always have it 80 (since seeing anything more than 80 is a waste of our eyes).


      Well, wouldn't that have to be done by the game developer? Since the overclockers don't want to drop to 50fps, does this mean it actually does make some sense to overclock to get 180fps if it means you won't ever drop below 80 or so? That's what I'm getting from your answer.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    3. Re:As good a time as any.. by seann · · Score: 1

      exactly
      kinda like Grand Theft Auto 2, if you play without the framerate limiter, everythings so fast, with the limiter, everythings the same pace (unless you blow up a screen full of cars).
      So in general there would be a steady FPS.

      Now if you over clocked it, in theroy you could get 180FPS, but in Grand Theft Auto 2 even when you blew up that screen full of cars (mm..carnage), and the screen would not slow down.

      Even nintendo, when to many fish's were on the screen on mario you would see slowdown.

      I guess where I'm going at is instead of rendering those extra frames (we only want 80, not 180, thats 100 extra frames, 120%) they would strickly render only 80 frames, and save valued GP time, and CPU time.

      This might actually be more a driver issue rather than Game programmer.

      Thats just my 1 cent.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  90. Pics of Xbox opened by techtransit.com · · Score: 1

    I took these yesterday morning and just found out about this site today. Here is my contribution to the hacking effort:

    www.techtransit.com/xbox
    username:Xbox
    passwd:granteD2

    If anyone gets any info on the HD format or Hooking it up to your pc via a crossover let me know.

    1. Re:Pics of Xbox opened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What pills are those on your dresser? Can I have some?

      I'm thinking, they might be just the ticket to reformulating my brain chemistry in such a way that I would piss away a bunch of money to buy a crappy piece of hardware then immediately take it apart.

    2. Re:Pics of Xbox opened by CityZen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice pics. Could you put up a nice hires pic of the motherboard? What are the chip numbers on the memory chips? Just curious. It's strange that they have places for 4 memory chips but only have 2 on there.

      Regarding the HD; if you've got an extra >8GB drive lying around, you might try sector-copying the Xbox drive to the larger drive and see if the Xbox will recognize the larger drive and its larger space.

    3. Re:Pics of Xbox opened by Sefirosu · · Score: 1

      I also took mine apart this afternoon and I wasn't able to get the hard drive to work connected to my PC either. BIOS would always give a "Drive error" message, and Linux: "Cannot read partition table" ...

      In mine, however, the hard drive is a Seagate ST310211A (http://www.seagate.com/support/disc/ata/st310211a .html) with a sticker on the drive "Firmware 6.55". Maybe they modified the firmware in some way, just a thought.

      I also took pics but I don't have enough bandwidth on this measly adsl connection to be slashdotted ;)

    4. Re:Pics of Xbox opened by techtransit.com · · Score: 1

      nope, they couldn't help such a loser. But hey I could, come around my way and i'll kick your ass so bad you wount even remember your name. Then you wouldn't need a brain ;)

      think it over,
      Problem Solver

  91. wow. what a crappy post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow. that sucked.
    not only did i get to see about fifty million pictures of some dude with a screwdriver, but the pictures of the box were totally worthless.

    i got more from the wired article about it 5 months ago.

    suck.

  92. Resale value? by spood · · Score: 1

    Why worry about the resale value of the console when you can just sell the box!

    --
    ---- Just another spud server.
    1. Re:Resale value? by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      What the fuck? Someone paid $366 for an empty box - and this time, the seller comes right out and says no less than 3 times, "There is no xbox inside. This is just an empty box."

      Whadda ya wanna bet the buyer gets pissed and claims to have been ripped off?

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  93. Why the Xbox is good. by pbrinich · · Score: 1

    It baffles me how some people on slashdot hate Microsoft for stifling competion and then hates them when they try to promote it. How can more competition in the game console market be bad? It will likely only shorten console life cycles and lead to more companies putting lots of time and energy in high quality games and accesories. How can this be bad for the consumer? Frankly, I'm glad someone has lit a fire under Sony's ass and it's up to them to make the next move.

    1. Re:Why the Xbox is good. by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      True, but having seen what MS can do to an entire industry, people are a little nervous.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  94. Tech TV Cancels 130 Employees by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    Didn't know it was Msftie Paul Allen's venture, untill I read this.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  95. Some facts about the Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know someone on the Xbox team, and here are some basics. EVERYTHING in the software is encrypted. Everything - the OS, the BIOS, the games,etc. The drivers in the hardware (disk, video, sound, etc) are not standard and have a crypto handshake procedure with the game software so that they don't run unless the game that is running talks to them correctly. The CD drive is this way too, and it looks for surface peculiarites on the ROM, including jitter. This box is not going to be impossible to hack, but my source said it would take him a long time to hack it, and he knew all the hardware internals. So good luck guys, you'll need it. But it will probably happen, it will just take a while.

  96. File System? by krmt · · Score: 2

    Are you sure it's journaling? For something so simple as saved games and prefs, it may not need it. Does anyone know any real facts about the file system?

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  97. But, does the damn thing work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a question which seems to have gone unanswered. The Xbox faithful seem to ramble on about the technical specs of this thing, claim it's nifty to play DVD's on it, and gab about the hard drive. The Microsoft haters seem to have adopted the, "Micro$oft sucks! I hate them!" philosophy toward the machine.

    Now, Microsoft has a slight reputational problem when it comes to the reliability of their software (that's putting it mildly, of course). Does this Xbox actually work as advertised, or is it a crashing, buggy mess like Windows?

    Seems to be a rather simple question...

  98. AGP memory hogging? by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Now, you may be better informed than me, but as I understood it APG cards use the system memory to store textures and PCI card don't. So indirectly it fills up the memory that otherwhise could have been used by the game and thus resulting in swapping dropping game performance when you do not have enough memory. Just set for kicks your aperture gate size to your whole system memory, fun eh?
    AGP memory usage can be read here

    Okay, so if I'm wrong, please explain me why my Pentium Pro 200, 128Meg EDO RAM and a VooDoo2 card with 16Meg onboard (PCI, I don't think those come in AGP) kicks the hell out of my P-III 800, 128Meg SD-Ram and NVidia GeForce MX2 with 32Meg onboard (Aperture set to 64Meg, as set by default in my BIOS). Both systems ran under a stock Windows 2000 install, after bootup ideling at about 55Meg Memory used as reported by the taskmanager. Both had the latest available drivers installed. The game in occurence is Half-Life, which has good support for both graphic cards: Glide for the VooDoo and Direct3D for the NVidia. Why did the P-III suddenly used about 196Meg Ram instead of 128Meg on the PPro. Both games were set to 800x600x16bit and maximum details. The only plausible explanation I found was that the P-III reserved a huge amount of memory for graphics data in main memory and the machine got low on memory and had to swap. Proof to my theory (for me) was that adding 128Meg (more now) to the P-III fixed the problem.

    I'm not a big gamer, but I was really astonished by those results.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  99. Re:fp nigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would think with the supposed intelligence of the /. crowd, you guys would be a little more sensitive than this Nigger shit!

  100. With a nice litte workaround. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    Ehm....take X-box disk out, insert disk in real PC, then ghost (or dd if=/dev/hdx of=/dev/hdy). Doesn't sound hard to me.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:With a nice litte workaround. by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      take X-box disk out, insert disk in real PC, then ghost

      And end up with your shiny new large-capacity drive able to use only the capacity of the original drive that you ghosted it from. Gaining exactly nothing in the process that I can see...

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    2. Re:With a nice litte workaround. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Depends, if it uses NTFS or FAT32 and you use Symantec Ghost it resizes the partition. I'm not very used to dd, I may lack of knowledge in the parameters doing advanced stuff :-) I used it occasionally and then used Partition Magic afterwards to resize and gain the space. Perhaps parted could do the trick too. I saw it in action on a machine of a coworker, very sleek.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  101. who cares? by nyseal · · Score: 1

    A lot of you folks out there may not remember the 'original' version of Pong; but I had one....it's what I grew up on (my first video game as a matter of fact). At that time, we were just excited to HAVE a video game console; not whether or not it supports USB, can be hacked, can support TiVO, can download email messages or if the hard drive is too big (granted all of these options were not available anyway at the time). JESUS...it's a GAME SYSTEM! Why does everyone have to dissect a game system to search for its vulnerabilitis or its capabilities? Why not just see it for what it is: A GAMING SYSTEM!!!!!!!! Just enjoy the games people! If you don't like it because it's MS, then don't buy it (ie..Dreamcast). But then again, knowing THIS crowd, if I buy one NOW, my email will be sent to China via a server in Taiwan by means of a government unlock code that will get me arrested in 2 days. Just relax people and remember: IT'S JUST A GAME!!!!!!!!!!!

    --
    [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    1. Re:who cares? by RFC959 · · Score: 1
      Why not just see it for what it is:
      A way for Gates and MS to expand into another field and take it over!
  102. the future from the xbox by Technosteve! · · Score: 1

    the xbox the technology behind the box is being brought to the computer. what i am talking about is the nforce set of motherboards from nvidia. the motherboards are very iintresting because it has on board video, sound and lan card intergration has become popular and the other manufactures will notice. the xbox seems a midpoint of two technologies. the computer and the console. it has the power of an computer infastrutre but has a static shelf life of a console. from this point on, the things that sperated the consoles from the computer will begin to rapidly merge to be one uniform product. will the xbox be sucessful in trying to sell us a all in one machine. is it trying to infilitrate the living rooms of america and spread the wide arms of microsoft across all parts of your life. will microsoft stragety of sell an all inclusive console work? will it bring up a new trend of intergration of internet and hard drive in to the console. we already seen sony having to bring out the ps3 sooner to match the force that microsoft has brung.

    --
    Me and lunchbox here are going to kick your ass.
  103. A Warning by rosssw · · Score: 1
    Just Curious. It has warnings on the outside of the box saying do not open. Then it has big yellow stickers on the inside that probably say danger, blah, blah, blah. The question is: If you open it you're either:


    A) Qualified as a technician, and therefore don't need the warnings, or


    B) Think you're smart enough not to need warnings anyway.


    So why two warnings, what a waste of money.

  104. I hope to turn my by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    X-Box into a linuX-Box.

    Let the hacking begin!

  105. Crack this open baby, ya! by mupi · · Score: 0
    Hey geeks, wouldn't you like to crack this open !?! Too bad you are geeks and will never get some.

  106. Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... That is, there is no video card RAM on the Xbox, there is no system RAM on the Xbox, there is just 'RAM' on the Xbox. The GPU and CPU both have equal access to it. The PC, as you surely know, does not work like that."

    The second part is incorrect. All of the newer 3DLabs Oxygen based graphics cards used a shared memory architecture which makes a certain amount of system memory directly available to the GPU. The GPU is a PCI "master" and thus can request the memory at its discretion.

    I.e., this kind of architecture (where the GPU has no local-memory) is a very small step from that. From a pure hardware architecture point of view, the nForce can also do this (though the memory is partitioned.)

  107. Law stops people from doing things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    How many people stopped using their pirated version of windows when software piracy started to be considered ilegal?
    How many people stopped smoking marihuana since it became iligal?
    I think people started sharing and downloading MP3 on the internet more and more since Napster became so popular because of metallica. And now that Napster almost dissappeared there are more people sharing any type of files (audio, video, software) out there. And since that "violates" the DMCA (which, of course, violates people's rights), I haven't heard of people getting jailed for downloading an MP3, or using a "pirated" Windows, or posting a microsoft "trade-secret" on Slashdot.

    I think the DMCA is just something for the people who call themselves "creators" of some things to shut their fucked kapitalist assholes off, while we all still being able of downloading what our balls sing.

  108. Hard Drive is for Virtual Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You bet that they couldn't fit the X-box OS, and the game in RAM at the same time! I bet you that they needed the hard disk so virtual memory could save the day.

  109. Linux by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 1

    Who's gonna be the one to hack it and put linux on the hard drive?

    --
    We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.