Slashdot Mirror


Rio Riot and Lyra Personal Jukebox

dschuetz writes: "SONICblue has the new Rio Riot up on their home page. It looks to me like an iPod killer -- 20 GB hard drive, very nice interface (better than Apple's), built-in FM tuner, powerful "DJ" functions, Lithium Ion batteries. And, at $399, it's priced competitively. The only question is -- how big is this thing? SONICblue has lots of other great systems out there, like the ReplayTV and Rio Receiver (which runs Linux), so the possibilities for hacking and otherwise extending this device are very good." Another submitter sends: "MP3 Newswire has a story on the RCA LYRA Personal Jukebox, a 20GB MP3/mp3PRO player that is the first portable to use the updated digital music compression scheme co-developed by its parent company Thompson. The new Lyra sells for $299. In related news, SonicBlue has released its first jukebox style player, also a 20GB unit called the Rio Riot that sells for $399. Both articles have pictures of the new players."

403 comments

  1. Still USB by S-prime · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, it's got a 20gig drive and an FM radio, but given the fact that it still uses a USB connection, how long is it gonna take me to transfer all my fmp3's?
    I, for one, will stick with my iPod.

    --
    -- Your local friendly mad scientist-in-training
    1. Re:Still USB by Shuh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah... but Apple better get its iPod out there cheaper because it's only a matter of time before USB-mp3-player buyers realize the USB connection technology is too slow for 6Gb and now 20Gb drives. When that happens, will they pay $400 for the *only* IEEE-1394 version? Hell no. They will wait around for the USB2 versions to come out in a year and then buy them by the gazillions -- thereby marginalizing IEEE-1394 and helping that bus technology bust into wide acceptance. This in turn will be the springboard USB2 would need to make a stab at the already-established IEEE-1394-based DV camera/editing market.

    2. Re:Still USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      For 20GB and maximum USB throughput (1.5MBytes/sec) it would take approx. 3 hours 47 minutes and 33 seconds. Ouch.

    3. Re:Still USB by alfredw · · Score: 1

      Well, it's good for all of the PC users who don't have firewire, for instance...

      Sure it takes ~4 hours to load up the drive, but who cares if you only have to do it once?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, sig types you!
    4. Re:Still USB by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 5, Informative

      USB2 is pretty pointless for non-computer devices. IEEE1394 devices can talk to each other, point-to-point. For example, you can have a 1394 camera interfacing directly with a 1394 editing console which in turn interfaces with a 1394 VTR. USB and USB2 devices require a computer to run the show. Thus you would plug your USB2 camera, if there will be such a thing, into your computer and your VTR into your computer, and use them. If you don't have a computer arbitrating USB traffic, the USB devices are useless.

    5. Re:Still USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen you all whiners, I got 6Gb jukebox on normal USB, and I transferred ALL files I need onto it and don't change it apart from ocasional adding of 1-2 songs, its DO ONCE AND FORGET!!! Bloody USB is not an issue, issues are: size, battery time, weight of unit, extra stuff like FM, and only then goes USB or USB2.

    6. Re:Still USB by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you can't afford a couple of hours to initially load your music, but would rather pay $400 for something with 25% of the HD space and no carrying case, have at it!

      I'm using the money I save to build another server.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    7. Re:Still USB by eggz128 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If thats what you want, check the USB On the go extention to USB2.

    8. Re:Still USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm using the money I save to build another server."
      Oh thats right, I forgot that the iPod is so much more expensive. I mean, they both are all of $399 and we all need at least two or three servers. :-)

    9. Re:Still USB by aka-ed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      3 hours 47 minutes and 33 seconds

      How often do you plan to wipe all 20 gigs? I can't see doing this very often.

      For my taste, 20, or even 5, gigs is way more than I need. The MXP-100 has up to a gig, and its weight is close to that of the 64 MB players.

      The real beauty is that you can buy a unit without memory ($149), pick up a cheap compact flash card and use that until the gigabyte microdrive becomes reasonable or is a "deal of the day" at buy.com.

      I don't see how any other player could be the "geek's choice."

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    10. Re:Still USB by mr100percent · · Score: 3, Informative

      What if I wanted to boot off the drive? you can do this with them. The firewire lets you boot exrtremely quickly, almost as fast as the Internal HD.

      But the USB will take at least 10 minutes before you can do anything useful, and it'll be as slow or slower than 10BaseT ethernet.

    11. Re:Still USB by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The intent with these large jukeboxes is that you put all your music on them and keep it there. Hence, you only transfer a given song once. The initial loading might take a few hours. After that, you can load new songs faster than you can rip them or download them from the net, so USB is fine for that.

    12. Re:Still USB by stripes · · Score: 4, Insightful
      USB2 is pretty pointless for non-computer devices.

      No, it is pointless for devices that you might never want to hook up to a computer :-)

      IEEE1394 devices can talk to each other, point-to-point. For example, you can have a 1394 camera interfacing directly with a 1394 editing console which in turn interfaces with a 1394 VTR.

      I don't know anyone who does that, which doesn't make it useless, but does make it less valuable. In fact everyone I know with a DV cam would much rather put the movie on their computer and edit it in iMovie or something.

      In fact the one place I know people wanted to use device-to-device FW it failed them. None of the new high end DSLRs want to look for a hard drive to write files on, they all want to have a computer suck them out. So no using the cute little portable firewire disks to store digital pics in the field, you need a bulky laptop, or a costly "digital wallet", and definitely no expensing the iPod for use as a storage device with your EOS-1D...

    13. Re:Still USB by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2

      I'm using the money I save to build another server."
      Oh thats right, I forgot that the iPod is so much more expensive


      My point was that the difference in price between my Iopener MP3 player ($99) and this portable craze ($399) is signifigant.

      I'm currently building a server to replace the "aging" Celeron 533 I put together. I've got 200 gigs of data to stick somewhere, and I found a rackmount ATX case ($89 at compgeeks.com), a dual P3 motherboard for $47 (same URL), so once I add a couple more components, and the two retail P3-1GHz at $140 each ... I've got a complete server for less than $600.

      Not to stray too far offtopic, of course.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    14. Re:Still USB by RustyTaco · · Score: 2
      For 20GB and maximum USB throughput (1.5MBytes/sec) it would take approx. 3 hours 47 minutes and 33 seconds. Ouch.
      I have to step in here and remind everybody that that is a very raw speed. USB has an extreamly heavy protocol which limits your actual transfer rates to 600-800kps, IF, and only IF, there is nothing else connected to the bus.
      Yep, that's right, the mere existance of a mouse plugged into the same bus will slow down the transfer a little bit. Probably not much, but some.
      - RustyTaco
    15. Re:Still USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to stray too far offtopic, of course.

      Too late!

      and I found a rackmount ATX case ($89 at compgeeks.com), a dual P3 motherboard for $47 (same URL), so once I add a couple more components, and the two retail P3-1GHz at $140 each ...

      Yeah, but will all that get you the ladies?

    16. Re:Still USB by alfredw · · Score: 1

      Oh, I certainly agree that Firewire is superior to USB. I'm just noting that it requires an (expensive) add-on card for most PCs :)

      --
      In Soviet Russia, sig types you!
    17. Re:Still USB by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but will all that get you the ladies?

      If it does, I'm in big trouble. My wife is the jealous type.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    18. Re:Still USB by penguinboy · · Score: 2

      This thing's supposed to be an MP3 player. I don't think using it as a boot device is really a major, critical feature. If you need to boot from an external drive, get a Firewire case.

    19. Re:Still USB by chriso11 · · Score: 1

      Get real. Why would I boot off of my MP3 player? That is simply retarded marketing thinking. Why not put a 1GB microdrive into a digital camera and boot from that too?

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    20. Re:Still USB by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2

      This is a really bizarre bit of logic.

      You're saying that people will wait a year for a technology that they can't distinguish between current technology? The transfer times are immaterially different (anyone frustrated by USB1.1 mp3 devices right now would not care whether they can transfer songs in 6 seconds or 5), the cost of entry is immaterially different (buy a 1394 card, or a USB2.0 card - 1394 cards are cheaper now), but one is available right now. Heck, Creative is even stickin' 'em in their sound cards.

      Nice flamebait, though.

      --
      --Matthew
    21. Re:Still USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm just noting that it requires an (expensive) add-on card for most PCs :)

      Expensive? Expensive my ass! :)

    22. Re:Still USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess if you like constantly swapping in and out albums then 1GB is enough. Oh, you don't have enough music to need 20GB? I do, and I'm not going to bother with a device that can't hold at least a significant chunk of it. And I don't particularly relish the idea of spending over 3 hours to set up my player in the first place.

      In fact I don't see how any player with less than 5GB of storage is worth a real geek's time.

    23. Re:Still USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB 2.0 has similar issues, though much worse. If you plug in a USB 1.0 device into a USB hub with a USB 2.0 device, the USB 2.0 device has to slow down to the same speed as the USB 1.0 device. But hey, at least it's *backward * compatible.

    24. Re:Still USB by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      In theory (as I don't have one yet), my core favorites go on the 1 gig drive, that's 10-15 hours of music. I'd also have stuff stored on some of the numerous compact flash cards I already own (due to a past line of work.) Not everybody has the latter advantage, I know.

      The Ipod is at least light and pocket-sized, this thing seems way too bulky for my pro-active lifestyle.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    25. Re:Still USB by stmpynode · · Score: 1

      i just built a new machine and finally upgraded from a soundblaster16 (isa) to an audigy. i can't wait for ipod to become linux or windows friendly

      --

      Blah.

    26. Re:Still USB by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      The iMac has no floppy drive, so it's convenient to store files on it and bring it with you. That way i can take my documents to school and print

    27. Re:Still USB by GSloop · · Score: 1

      Here's what chaps my hide....

      I want a boat that is an airplane and digs post holes too...

      That's what you're saying about the IPod...There's no device out there that does all things - the best devices do a _FEW_ things really well, and leave the other stuff to other crappier devices.

      The IPod is a great looking device, and from all accounts, is a great size and has a wonderful UI. Just leave it at that - don't try to claim it's a great posthole digger too...You just damage the product and your credibility.

      FWIW, I think the IPod _is_ too expensive, and I'm not willing to shell out the $$$ just yet. But the use as a portable drive/boot off it/install the latest OSX build etc claims of the Mac'ies just makes me think they're smoking something they aren't sharing.

      Just say, hey it's a GREAT device, and I love it. The UI is beautiful, and I feel it's worth every penny. Then shut-up. You just look stupid trying to pump it up even more.

      PS. How many Mac'ies have actually booted from the IPod, or transferred files from one machine to another? More than once? For more than novelty purposes - or to say "you done it?" I can't imagine it's very many? But then again, I could be wrong - I'd just like to hear someone actually tell me they did...

    28. Re:Still USB by davesag · · Score: 1
      The thing in love about my iPod is that when i bought it, i took it out of the box, sat down with it and my TitG4 in the nearest laksa shop and plugged the two things together. 5 mts later my iPod was synched with the 4.6 gigs of MP3 on my mac and it had charged enough that i could have a play with it. Try charging your RIO through that USB port mate. By the time i'd finished my lunch the iPod was charged well enough that i could listen to it all the way home.

      also, the iPod's user interface is the simplest i have encountered. the RIO's would have to be pretty damn simple to beat it. My 3 year old niece had no difficulty figuring out how to work my iPod after about a minute of fiddling with it. add to that the iPod is so sturdy I had no fear whatsoever letting my niece have a play with it - yes she did have a chew at the edge :-)

      all in all the rio looks cool for a home bound rack but for portability, usability and all round coolness the iPod wins hands down.

      also i have found plenty of occasions already where having a 5 gb firewire drive in your pocket is a really handy thing to have. and the coolest iPod feature - hold down the little middle button for 5 seconds while in the 'about' screen and the classic game 'brickles' starts up. nice easter egg.

      dave

      --
      I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
    29. Re:Still USB by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Actually, yeah. We got a couple at work to play with (all apple office, belive it or not), and we've put our restore images (its like a ghost) on them, and use it to set up new machines, since they don't fit on cds anylonger. We've got bad wiring in the building, so its ooddles faster than pretending we can actually get 100Mbs connections accross the network. Its not a reason for me persoanlyl to buy one, but it certainly is a nice plus.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    30. Re:Still USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have the cash to buy two 1Gig microdrives, go ahead and ignore me. Starving college students look for a bargain.

  2. Well... by Pludodog · · Score: 1

    It looks good, if it really is the size of, or slightly larger than the ipod, I'd definitely think of buying it. Unfortunately, it's limited to USB, which mostly negates the ability to use it as a portable hard drive/ transfer music to it quickly. If a company finds a way to release something the size of an ipod with firewire, but useable on pc's, I'd definitely get it, as it has so many uses.

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      One quick search on Google will tell you that you can use the iPod on Win98/2000/XP . . .

      Download the trial here.

    2. Re:Well... by nemui-chan · · Score: 1

      In an argument though, the Ipod can not be used as a portable hard drive either, since it does not support, nor will it probably EVER support the capability to transfer files OFF of the IPOD. Their version of copyright infringement protection I guess.

    3. Re:Well... by AtaruMoroboshi · · Score: 1

      > the Ipod can not be used as a portable hard drive either

      I'm afraid you are wrong about that, it just stores the mp3s for playback in a hidden directory. You can put files on it in clear view (that won't be read by the mp3 player)

      and getting mp3s off of it is easy, plug it into a mac with OS X installed, fire up terminal, and copy files in the command line interface, as it ignores the visibility settings on the folders on your drive. Very easy.

      Apple thinks music piracy is a social problem, not a technical one.

      .

  3. iPod killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt it! Looks way too big and is still using USB . . .

  4. Close by dadragon · · Score: 1

    Close, but not firewire. It's reasonable to assume that Apple will release a bigger iPod sometime soon, if so, then this is moot.

    What it needs to be an iPod killer is Firewire. The iPod's 5gb is plenty for most people, I know I wouldn't need any more than that, as I only have about 1-2gb of MP3s.

    Besides, do you want to copy 20gb worth of songs over USB?

    --
    God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    1. Re:Close by jcr · · Score: 2

      Close, but not firewire. It's reasonable to assume that Apple will release a bigger iPod sometime soon, if so, then this is moot.

      I concur. Firewire makes a *vast* difference in the product's usability.

      Also, I find the claim of a better UI than the iPod rather difficult to credit.

      -jcr (I work for Apple, adjust salinity as required.)

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Close by mikeylebeau · · Score: 1

      Even if they don't actually release a larger iPod for a while, it's already been shown that you can just take out the 5GB PCMCIA drive in the iPod and slip in whatever you want -- I think the largest you can get today is a 20GB -- and it will work. The firmware supports up to something like 1000GB, should that day ever come. ;) Granted, this will void your warranty, but it's nice to know that once the warranty's up anyway, if I really need more space (I'll admit I definitely *could* fill up a lot more than 5GB, although at this point I certainly don't need to) I can relatively easily upgrade my existing device, which I cherish with all of my heart. :P

      -mikey

    3. Re:Close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not when USB 2.0 is around the corner...
      May be it is not all that bad.

    4. Re:Close by mikeylebeau · · Score: 1

      One more thing.. I also *highly* agree that USB is preposterous for this application. I had a Nomad Jukebox a while back, the 6GB model, and it was a total pain in the ass. Of course the first time loading songs was a bitch, but those who say that's the only thing that sucks about the USB connection have clearly never had to deal with it regularly. You get this feeling of a stagnant drive you never want to swap files on and off from because it's such a slow pain in the ass (not to mention the god-awful software that Creative, in their typical style of quality, had for transferring files), and even just adding a few songs here and there becomes a chore.

      Trust me, the FireWire is brilliant, and really important.

      -mikey

    5. Re:Close by nemui-chan · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to also consider that some people have over 5 gigs but under 20. I have about 12 gigs of mp3's personally, and I'd love to be able to have that all on one player. Also I'd just let it copy overnight and go to sleep. Let it run through all night and the next day at work and your set. Also, if apple DOES release a bigger Ipod, you can be sure it isn't going to be $400 when its released. And if it is, it isnt going to be worth $400 anymore. ;)

  5. iPod Crusher maybe? by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The iPod is so popular because of the size. This thing uses a laptop harddrive like all the others. The iPod it self could fit inside these mp3 players that use laptop drives. It also uses USB. Please, do the math on how long it would take to transfer 20 gigs on USB.

    1. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by ApheX · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Actually, the iPod does -NOT- use a Laptop Hard drive. Laptop drives have a 9.5mm spec which corresponds to the 2.5inch profile. The iPod drive has a 5mm spec corresponding to a 1.8 inch profile. Toshiba is the only manufacturer making this drive and the biggest one they have right now is 5GB.

      More info on the Toshiba drive here

      --

      -
      aphex
      I Steal Music!
    2. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by thesolo · · Score: 2, Redundant

      well, USB 1 has a max transfer rate of 12 Mbits/sec. 12/8 = ~1.5, so a little more than 1 megabyte per second. Therefore, 1 gig would be rougly 670 seconds, or 11 mins, give or take. Full drive would be over 220 minutes, or 3.6 hours. And that is at theoretical best rate possible. Realistically, closer to 4 hours. I don't know about the rest of you, but I dont have 20 gigs of mp3, or 4 hours to spare transferring them.

    3. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by SirDrinksAlot · · Score: 1

      I didnt say it did, i said these other ones do.

      Quote (of me!): The iPod it self could fit inside these mp3 players that use laptop drives.

    4. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by tdelaney · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't think this is an iPod killer, not that I'm going to be buying either of them anyway (4 years since I last used a portable music source ...).

      And USB is vastly inferior to FireWire for these applications.

      However, I do have to take issue with the "I don't have 4 hours to spare to transfer". It's very simple. Do it while you are asleep. Surely you sleep for 4 hours (or more) at a time?

    5. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by krogoth · · Score: 2

      Lets look at that another way: an averga MP3 is 128Kbps, or 16KB/s. One hour would be approximately 56.25MB. In other words, you can transfer one hour of music in under a minute (at max speed, but that's assumed everywhere else). I've seen a post on this story saying "I can wake up and choose 500 songs to put on my iPod and have them there in no time" - how many of you do this every morning? Transfering enough music to listen to for a week straight (assuming you have the space) would take 157 minutes - under 3 hours. You could set it up in the afternoon and not have to stay up late to shut down the computer. But, most people don't listen to music all the time. If you only use it 3 hours per day, divide that by 8 - 20 minutes to transfer enough music to last you a week.

      Unless you reformat the drive and reload your entire music collection regularly, this really isn't bad. Sure, it could be faster, but the iPod is expensive and has a very small capacity - probably the smallest of the portable hard-drive based players. I think most of them are iPod killers.

      --

      They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
    6. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine one of these dropped from a height onto an iPod. Now imagine an iPod dropped from a height onto this thing. Please, do the math. Then you'll conclude this thing is an iPod crusher.

      So is a hammer.

    7. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by higginsta · · Score: 1
      Lets look at that another way...

      Really what you are saying is that you will organize your life around this one activity to make up for the weakness of the design. The point of the iPod's UI and the inclusion of Firewire is to make the process of using the hardware as transparent as possible.

      Gee, maybe one morning you do decide to wipe the whole drive because you want to take a few ISO 's over to your friend who does not have high speed access. You do not hesitate because you know it will only takes a few minutes before work to replace your entire music collection. The hardware gets out of your way and lets you do things unlike the other "Jukeboxes"

      The point of technology is to improve our lives,freeing us from mundane and repetitive tasks, I for one am not going to waste my time and resources by using technology that does not provide me that freedom.

      It's ironic that most people in this forum want software to "be free" in some capacity but don't seem to want the same freedom from technology for themselves.

    8. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after much searching, i found out the following dimensions for this thing:

      5.5-inch-long, 3.75-inch-wide, 1.25-inch-thick player

      so not huge, but pretty big. big enough to give rio good reason to hide it in their web page.

      schmofo.

    9. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by krogoth · · Score: 2

      Most people buy these devices to listen to music (at least I did). If you want a portable hard drive, then get one. Don't complain when an MP3 player doesn't work like a portable hard drive - it isn't one.

      --

      They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
    10. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stupid poster. read the actual post you're replying to.

      stupid moderators. read the actual post he's replying to.

    11. Re:iPod Crusher maybe? by rob.eberhardt · · Score: 1

      Well, actually, the iPod IS one.

  6. UI by damiam · · Score: 1

    Until they makesomething with as nice an interface as the iPod, I won't buy one. And it needs to have FireWire.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    1. Re:UI by Paradoxish · · Score: 1

      Firewire is reasonable, but take a look at the interface. I'd, personally, prefer it over the iPod's anyday.

      --
      If you need to interpret my post, then you don't get it.
    2. Re:UI by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      I think the iPod's is far simpler. It takes no more than 30 seconds to learn the iPod, this looks like it'll take longer.

    3. Re:UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only does the new Rio interface look more complicated than the iPod's, it looks like it takes two hands.

      But, looks can be deceiving. Still, I don't see how the original poster could claim (with a straight face) that this UI beats the iPod's just from seeing a picture on the web page. We should wait until somebody actually has one in hand.

      My guess is that this UI will be preferred by those who enjoy playing video games using modern controllers (which this Rio looks a bit like)--and that's no doubt a LOT of people. Me, I like simplicity (and one-handed functionality) so I'll probably still prefer the iPod's UI.

  7. USB is a bit slow for this... by mjpaci · · Score: 1

    Is that a USB 1 or 2 interface on the thing? iPod's big advantage is its FireWire port. How long will it take you to put your 20GB onto the new device?

    Does every new device have to be deemed "An iPod Killer"?

    --Mike

    1. Re:USB is a bit slow for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does every new device have to be deemed "An iPod Killer"? Yes it does, because apple has set the standard (once again) and companies want there product to be better then the standard.

  8. Very nice by Paradoxish · · Score: 1

    The Riot is one slick looking machine. A lot nicer, IMNSHO, than the iPod. From what I've heard about it, the interface will be better as well. Unfortunetly, $399 is still a bit steep. Not that I don't think mp3 players are 'nifty' and all, but I've got a 12-disc changer in my car, a 60-disc changer in my room, and a laptop that has mp3s ripped from most of the CDs I own. And even for people who don't have quite as much audio equipment (or audio capable equipment) I've never quite understood the need to have something like 50 albums available all the time, anywhere.

    Not that's it not something good to have, just seems like there are better things to buy for $400.

    --
    If you need to interpret my post, then you don't get it.
    1. Re:Very nice by educated_foo · · Score: 1

      "...the interface will be better as well"

      I must have missed something, because both players appeared to have two-handed interfaces (buttons on both sides of the screen). Sure, two hands is fine for a gameboy, but try jogging with both hands clutching your mp3 player.

    2. Re:Very nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When you have the iPod, which is so small and so easy to use, and you have 50 albums on it, you notice. You don't think, "which CDs am I gonna take with me in the car" you don't wrassle with jewel cases or CaseLogic sleeves, you don't stuff an extra disc here and there into your book bag heading to the library or laptop case. You just take the tiny little iPod, and when you get a CD you know you're gonna wanna listen to in the next few weeks you put it on there. It's total one-hand operation. I leave it in the center console of my car and I never bring CDs anywhere. Too fragile. I rip them on iTunes (takes about 10 mins), and import them to iPod (couple seconds) and go. Having 5gb makes it so you don't really have to plan and are rarely disappointed.

    3. Re:Very nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The iPod is a decidedly one-handed interface. I've never had two hands on mine at once. It's too small. It has a ring of transport controls, a jog wheel, and an action button, laid out in concentric circles. You hold it in your hand with your thumb on the action button. You move about with the jog wheel (and change volume, and control the little thing in Breakout),, choose menu items with the action button, and use the play/TF/TB/menu buttons by moving your thumb to the extremes of the circle. After you get okay at it, you don't even need to take it out of your pocket to track around and adjust the volume.

    4. Re:Very nice by heffer · · Score: 1

      OK. By the looks of this thing, it is going to be big. Almost like one of those old Sega handhelds... what were they called? Well, on top of that, it is the same price as an iPod. The interface looks snazzy, but I don't like how it is all spread out... just my .02

  9. not an ipod killer by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 1

    Not only does it have only USB rather than firewire, it also lacks the software integration and sheer coolness factor of the iPod (which is able to run off a single cable)

    --


    Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
  10. No firewire by yggdrazil · · Score: 1

    When the storage capacity of these things increase beyond gigabytes, USB is just too slow.

    The iPod sells a lot because of good design and user interface. The Riot looks black and ugly to me.

    The iPod can be used as a firewire harddrive.

    It doesn't seem to me that the Riot "kills" the iPod in any way at all.

    1. Re:No firewire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>

      Good job! You figured out it was black.

    2. Re:No firewire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      beyond gigabytes? you mean terabytes? usb is too slow for even less than gigabytes. I would just assume to have 100mb ethernet going to my device or 802.11b! now that would be cool. and maybe stick a ti-89 and something that would put the flavor back into used chewing gum and have a sub $400usd price. Also how about a tivo for XM radio. or even a tivo for fm radio. the ipod has the processor to do the realtime encoding of mp3. to bad it laks the software. Could some of you tech-heads out there build be a FM radio tivo and have it search that database of song fingerprints so it can figure out how to index and label my radio content. also since the sound quality is lower, maybe you could encode two or three stations at the same time.

  11. Huh? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It looks like it has approximately the same interface as the iPod, is as big as a paperback book, and interfaces over USB. USB is 12Mbps. It would take 3.9 hours to populate a 20GB disk.

    This thing is no iPod killer. The great thing about the iPod is that I can put it in my pocket, and the firewire interface is so fast that I don't need to put ALL of my MP3s on it: it takes only seconds to load a fresh collection.

    1. Re:Huh? by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2, Insightful

      USB is 12Mbps. It would take 3.9 hours to populate a 20GB disk.
      This thing is no iPod killer. The great thing about


      I'm sick of hearing this. "Firewire is in many new PCs and sound cards, and it is a zillion times faster!"

      I have a 40 gig USB HD for my iOpener-based car MP3 player. It took me about 11 hours to completely upload all 34 gigs of my music to it. When I want to add music, I plug it into my PC (or almost *ANY* PC or Mac, since USB *IS* ubiquitous at this point), it mounts, and I spend 10 minutes putting another couple of albums worth of music onto it.

      If the initial load is *THAT* important to you-- that is you want your favorite 5 gigs uploaded in 15 minutes, instead of a couple of hours-- then pay the premium. I personally am willing to let the thing run overnight once to get my favorite 20 gigs onto it.

      Fact is, with the Riot you're getting a device with 4 times the storage space, plus an FM tuner, for the same price. Oh, and you get a carrying case, too!

      The gee-whiz effect Mr. Jobs used to have on me is gone. I marvel at the products, gasp at the price, then leave some other (more liquid) consumer to pay the premium.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    2. Re:Huh? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Personally the major holdup for me when even considering buying a ipod is the fact that I have to buy a 1000~4000 dollar mac dongle to go along with it.

    3. Re:Huh? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "This thing is no iPod killer. The great thing about the iPod is that I can put it in my pocket, and the firewire interface is so fast that I don't need to put ALL of my MP3s on it: it takes only seconds to load a fresh collection."

      Although you seem to be right, most regular users won't realise this. And Apple knows that they won't realise it.

      This 20G product could be good because it might give Apple the motivation to get PC Support for the IPod in working order before something else could potentially steal the market.

    4. Re:Huh? by usunoro · · Score: 1

      uh... just use XPod... the PC iPod software from a 3rd party company (I don't recall who though)

      --
      -- Tim
    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other nice thing about the iPod is that it recharges through the Firewire interface. These other devices have the usual wall wart.

    6. Re:Huh? by GoRK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well that's because you need a carrying case for it! Not only does it have four times the capacity. it's four times the size!

      If price were the only feature that people based their decisions on, then why are people driving the new VW bugs? This HDD may be 20GB but if I'm carrying around a 20GB HDD, and I find myself needing to take a couple gigs of photoshop files home from the office or vice versa, I sure as hell wouldn't use this to do it! An iPod would be right on task, though.

      Someone could produce a portable player with a 160GB Desktop HDD powered by a lawnmower battery with a small color screen that you could carry around in your backpack (included of course) for the same price as the Rio Riot or the iPod. It could make you download all your files via a 115200 baud serial connection, and then I could dish out the same argument you just did to defend it.

      Seriously, it's a different product for a different market. It may be a bit pricey, but then again, it's your choice to buy it or not. If apple could price iPod cheaper and it would increase the demand for it enough that it would benefit them to lower the price -- you know what -- they would. They have smart marketing people setting the price on their stuff. It's not like they just make it more expensive because they want to see who's stupid enough to buy it.

      ~GoRK

    7. Re:Huh? by RustyTaco · · Score: 1
      Fact is, with the Riot you're getting a device with 4 times the storage space, plus an FM tuner, for the same price. Oh, and you get a carrying case, too!
      Remind me again why a carrying case is a good thing? Seems to me that if something is big and fragile enough to need a carrying case it would be just a bit of a PITA to deal with. The FM tuner is nice, yes, but I'm just not seeing where having a carrying case for something that's supposed to be carried in a pocket is a good thing.

      - RustyTaco
    8. Re:Huh? by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2

      Seems to me that if something is big and fragile enough to need a carrying case it would be just a bit of a PITA to deal with.

      I dunno, I was just over at Macintouch reading the iPod reader reports, and everyone and their mother is griping about the lack of a carrying case, and pointing to a handful of companies that offer good ones to fit the iPod.

      It seems to ME that anybody who's going to invest $400 in a small electronic device that they're going to toss around for (hopefully) a few years, they'd want a cheap and replaceable way to give it a little more ruggedness.

      I've had a Visor for two years now, and have gone through two hip-holster padded carrying cases for it. I have no scratches or cracks on my Visor. I know only one person who carries his Palm around with no protection, and his is nicked and dented like sin. It's only a matter of time before he body-checks the wall with it in his pocket and breaks the screen.

      Of course, he's not as clumsy as me either. ;)

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    9. Re:Huh? by sct · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually they changed the name to apease Apple. The new name is XPlay. It can be found at http://www.mediafour.com/products/xplay/.

      But it is still in pre-release mode- looking at it I would say it is almost beta quality. I like the iPod, and might pick one up- but I need access to it, I hear the old style iMacs are going cheap and will run OS 10.1.

    10. Re:Huh? by stripes · · Score: 2
      If the initial load is *THAT* important to you-- that is you want your favorite 5 gigs uploaded in 15 minutes, instead of a couple of hours-- then pay the premium

      What premium? Putting FireWire on a device is dirt cheap. I'm willing to pay and extra $10 to have both USB and FireWire.

      The real premium for the iPod is the Apple brand (worthless, but you pay for it), tiny size (and to me this is worth it, I have no use for something that won't fit in my pocket), and a clean UI (this has some value, but also some cost - I would like different EQ settings on the iPod then my desktop because the headphones are different from my speakers). The FireWire doesn't really cost anything.

      Fact is, with the Riot you're getting a device with 4 times the storage space, plus an FM tuner, for the same price. Oh, and you get a carrying case, too!

      On the other hand it looks really bulky. I don't want to walk the dog with it let alone run. When would I carry this thing that I couldn't take my laptop?

    11. Re:Huh? by stripes · · Score: 1
      They have smart marketing people setting the price on their stuff. It's not like they just make it more expensive because they want to see who's stupid enough to buy it.

      Yeah, they always hit the right price point, like with the cube...

      (I know, they normally hit decent prices though...a little high, but normally justified by quality components and good design)

    12. Re:Huh? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      Heh :) Exactly

    13. Re:Huh? by stripes · · Score: 2
      I dunno, I was just over at Macintouch reading the iPod reader reports, and everyone and their mother is griping about the lack of a carrying case, and pointing to a handful of companies that offer good ones to fit the iPod.

      Of corse they are. Seldom does anyone write in about something they love! Bitching about anything they don't like is way way way more fun. So you always get more complaints the positive comments.

      Plus it's hard to keep the bright polished metal back clean, so a lot of people want to hide it. Personally I just stick the thing in my shirt (or jacket) pocket and don't worry.

      I've had a Visor for two years now, and have gone through two hip-holster padded carrying cases for it. I have no scratches or cracks on my Visor.

      I had mine for what seems like a lot longer (from whenever the pre-orders came in until about six months ago). One small crack on the cover, no big deal. Then I crushed it with my knee when playing with the dog. I doubt most carrying cases would have protected it. Before I had the Visor I had a Palm with the little leather case. The case made it too big and I didn't really like carrying it around. That's why I didn't get one for the Visor.

    14. Re:Huh? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Well that makes sense actually :) - still your the first to make this arguement - I've never heard about the application but it sounds like a good idea.

    15. Re:Huh? by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I have a 40 gig USB HD for my iOpener-based car MP3 player.
      If the initial load is *THAT* important to you-- that is you want your favorite 5 gigs uploaded in 15 minutes, instead of a couple of hours-- then pay the premium. I personally am willing to let the thing run overnight once to get my favorite 20 gigs onto it.

      Well... for a car stereo, I quite agree with you. Most people don't spend enough time in their cars to need constantly updated 5GB of mp3s, and the beauty of it being in a car is... you don't have to carry it.

      The appeal of the iPod is that its drive is big enough that you can have a lot of variety in your music (more than the album 64MB players give you, or the small collection a single CD in a CD player gives you), and its fast enough that if it still doesn't hold all of your music, it can be switched over quickly.

      Something like the Riot, or your 40GB car unit, however, can only really be usable with incremental changes in their storage. If your needs ever outgrow it (I do know a few people who can/will overflow 40GB, and you yourself have already topped 20GB), it loses a lot of utility. And, of course, you won't be carrying your iOpener when you go jogging, or this Riot either.

      It bears repeating: the iPod isn't revolutionary or neat or interesting because it's completely new, but because it was clearly designed from the ground up to be used the way people would like to use an mp3 player. It's big enough that you could listen to it all day without hearing a repeat, it's small enough that you can carry it with you where ever you go all day, and it's fast enough that it doesn't have to hold all of your music to be useful.

      --
      --Matthew
    16. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It would take 3.9 hours to populate a 20GB disk.


      Plus an extra few minutes for changing the batteries halfway through. Nice thing about the iPod is that the battery actually charges while you're downloading.

    17. Re:Huh? by anothergene · · Score: 0

      It's only a matter of time before he body-checks the wall with it in his pocket and breaks the screen. A carrying case is going to save you from hip checking a wall?

      --
      Who's leg do I have to hump to get a dry martini around here?
    18. Re:Huh? by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Does anybody else find it humorous that on Slashdot, we're actually hearing peple say "Just let it run overnight." Off all the places I'd expect to find people who aren't willing to wait for something computer related when we don't have to, this would be it. we buy computers that are rediculously fast, have wicked fast internet connections, complain when our palms don't sync fast enough, bitch about the length of time it takes people to learn things, but now we're willng to wait over night to load up an mp3 player. How often do you have to let anything at all run overnight (excluding rendering)? Are you happy about it when it does?

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    19. Re:Huh? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      The firewire charging "feature" is absurd. I drop my Palm m500 in its cradle every day upon arriving home and it gets charged whether I turn on my computer or not. And yes, I know you can buy a separate power brick-- I just think it's ridiculous that they don't include it as standard.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    20. Re:Huh? by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2

      A carrying case is going to save you from hip checking a wall?

      Mine has, on multiple occaisions. I paid bucks for mine at handspring.com, the neoprene hip belt-loop thingy. It has plastic inserts and good foam padding.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    21. Re:Huh? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2

      The iPod comes with a wall brick that can charge the computer directly, and most Apple computers have deep sleep modes which aare very nearly off but the FireWire ports still have power. Apple users don't tend to actually turn their machines OFF.

  12. Still just an mp3 player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    With 20gb of storage and a $400 price tag why aren't these machines pda's as well as mp3 players. Even if they didn't have a screen you could use a touch pen on that would be nice...

  13. No Firewire - No go by agentfive · · Score: 1

    Great improvement in storage size - but no firewire. USB blows.

    --
    -- Jay Brewer -- http://www.blogpire.com
  14. Huh. by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It looks to me like an iPod killer


    That's funny. I had heard that the iPod was lame. Why would we need an iPod killer?


    (In any case, it's still using USB. That's gotta be painful for moving 20GB of music...)

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Huh. by SpookyFish · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am not a big Apple fan, but the iPod is FAR from lame!

      Besides Firewire, it has 32 meg of ram, more than any other HD based player -- more buffering, less HD access. It uses the memory to store the file database as well, so there is no wait for the hard drive to spin up to navigate through files/folders.

      The 1.8" HD allows it to be much smaller & lighter -- about half the weight and size of the next-smallest HD based player. 5 gig is the largest 1.8" drive available right now AFAIK, but that will change soon, I am sure.

      The only way to get a smaller/lighter fairly large capacity player is to use the 1GB Microdrive + a CF2 compatible memory player (with questionable battery life).

      Instead of these oversized behemoths, why won't someone else use the 1.8" drive and make a player that is Win/Mac compatible (natively) that has Firewire AND USB?!

      /comment

    2. Re:Huh. by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 1

      why won't someone else use the 1.8" drive and make a player that is Win/Mac compatible (natively) that has Firewire AND USB?!

      Because it would cost $599 and no one would buy it.

    3. Re:Huh. by SpookyFish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nonsense. A USB -> IDE interface chip and a mini PCB mounted USB port would cost like $10 in volume. iPod is $399 and the vast majority of the cost is in the 1.8" drive. As ultraportable laptops, PDAs, etc. start using 1.8", capacity will go up and cost will come down. In a few years 1.8" drives will probably be as common as 2.5" are today.

      Even if it cost, say, $449, early adopters will spend it, justifying the R&D because in a year or so it's a volume product at $249 and they are selling a new, smaller, 20 gig version back to the same early adopters for $449.

    4. Re:Huh. by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 1

      Remember, he also wants Firewire AND win/mac compatability, so maybe $549. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for the sake of argument accept $449.

      People are screaming and crying about the iPod at $399. By the time something like this comes to market, XPod (or whatever it's called these days), will probably have already been out for three months. Nearly everyone who wanted something like this would already have gotten an iPod. So the only thing the new device would have going for it is USB. How many people do you know who would rather spend $449 on this new device for USB support when they could buy an iPod and a Firewire card for the same price or lower?

      So, okay, maybe not $599, but still, no one would buy it and it would never become the "volume product" you think it would.

    5. Re:Huh. by SpookyFish · · Score: 1

      An interesting argument, though I tend to disagree. People are screaming and crying at the $399 who can't afford it. I read that Apple has sold 120k of them and can't keep stores stocked, so I don't think price is a barrier yet.

      This argument has strange similarities to the Linux v. Windows battle. Yes, you can get one (iPod), yes you can make it work on this system, no it isn't user friendly, no it isn't easy for non-technical people to do -- and most importantly -- 95% of the time, the CompUSA, Circuit City, etc. sales guy is going to say "Mac or PC", and steer you away from the iPod without native PC support.

      Then again, perhaps the market for HD MP3 players is mostly limited to those who would have the technical savvy to figure out how to make it work.. or perhaps Apple jumps in with a PC version for $429 that has Windows software and a USB to Firewire adapter, and kills you anyway :)

      I said "tend" to disagree because I am not certain. Interesting to ponder, anyway.

    6. Re:Huh. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2
      I am not a big Apple fan, but the iPod is FAR from lame!

      Obviously, you didn't get the joke.

      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    7. Re:Huh. by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      The only thing lame about is it is the price. Why couldn't they lower it down to a more consumer-oriented $299?

      My argument is, if it costs more than most home entertainment devices (DVD players, consoles) then it's overpriced.

    8. Re:Huh. by nemui-chan · · Score: 1

      Really? Everyone I know that's had one likes it quite a bit. Says it has a good interface, fast transfer to, good form factor, and good sound. What more do you need in an mp3 player?

  15. make it play vorbis by austad · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    Once someone releases one that will play my Vorbis files, I'll buy one. I re-encoded my whole collection into Vorbis, and now I'm much happier (re-encoded from the CD, not from mp3's).

    Until then, I'll do without one.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:make it play vorbis by emptybody · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why the hell arre the personal digital audio players all skipping vorbis? Don't they need to pay royalties to Germany for the ability to do MP3?

      What will it take to get them to support vorbis !?!?!?!

      --
      comment directly in my journal
    2. Re:make it play vorbis by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is that these portable players all use ASIC MP3 decoders. They do the job accurately and without drawing much power. There are no existing Ogg Vorbis ASIC decoders, so you would need to do it in software with a relatively beefy CPU, which in turn means significantly reduced battery life.

    3. Re:make it play vorbis by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      You may have stumbled on to something there. One wonders if somebody would find it worth producing hardware based on open source desgin. For instance would hardware support for Mesa help spur it's acceptance?

    4. Re:make it play vorbis by OctaneZ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not all MP3 player companies are using the ASIC MP3 decoders. iRiver the company that produces the CD MP3 players that Rio rebrands as their own is using ARM processors and is actively developing Ogg support for their players.

      Thier New Player the SlimX is really quite neat looking, some pictures are provided here.

      If you are looking for discussions about MP3/etc players I recoment MP3's Portables message board.

      -OctaneZ

    5. Re:make it play vorbis by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'm waiting for someone to take my money. So far, no one has wanted it. My portable music player is still an old CD player.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    6. Re:make it play vorbis by duren686 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know it's slightly redundant, but I figure in this thread it'll get more OGG-related attention.

      The Soul Player is firmware-upgradeable, so if they see enough people wanting Ogg Vorbis support, they can write an upgrade to have the thing read (and play!) the format, and all you'd have to do is burn the update to a CD-RW.

      Or, alternatively, some ambitious hacker-type person could figure out the firmware format, and write their own Soul Ogg decoder.

      --
      Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
    7. Re:make it play vorbis by n6mod · · Score: 3, Informative

      What will it take to get them to support vorbis !?!?!?!

      An integer Vorbis decoder. How many times do I have to shout this from the rooftops. Excluding the hardware-decoder players, <SARCASM> which are doomed to failure because they won't play Microsoft's decreed format, </SARCASM> every one of the current crop of players could play Vorbis, if there were an integer decoder. None of these machines have FPUs and they certainly don't have enough horsepower for FPU emulation to keep up with an audio stream.

      If the Vorbis team would make an integer-only decoder happen "now" instead of "eventually", they'd see a lot more market adoption. Microsoft figured this out, why can't Vorbis?

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    8. Re:make it play vorbis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Soul Player [easybuy2000.com] is firmware-upgradeable, so if they see enough people wanting Ogg Vorbis support, they can write an upgrade to have the thing read (and play!) the format, and all you'd have to do is burn the update to a CD-RW.

      The iPod is exactly the same, except instead of a CD-RW being involved you just plug the iPod into a mac to upgrade..

      I will sit here and wait for the iPod to be reverse-engineered to the point where third parties can make bootleg ipod firmwares

    9. Re:make it play vorbis by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      I work at a company that does firmware for these devices. One of our coders said that he'd put in the time to make Vorbis work in our reference code if only someone could cough up a fixed-point Vorbis algo. Considering that many of the players on the market start with our code base, this is a great opportunity for some mad coder out there to become a folk hero.

  16. "iPod killer" my foot, Michael..... by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Redundant

    No mp3 player that expects us to deal with USB is an "iPod killer"
    Can this thing be used as an external drive?
    Battery life?
    Interface with iTunes or does it require its own software?

    Still USB.... blah.

    1. Re:"iPod killer" my foot, Michael..... by jarodss · · Score: 1

      Can this thing be used as an external drive?

      Doesn't say.

      Battery life?

      10 hours

      Interface with iTunes or does it require its own software?

      It's bundled with iTunes and RealJukebox.

    2. Re:"iPod killer" my foot, Michael..... by EvilStein · · Score: 2

      hmm.. I don't see iTunes listed anywhere on that page.

      Why would Apple license iTunes out for this product when it's trying to be a direct competitor to the iPod?
      I don't see it happening. Sure, iTunes will probably support it, but I highly doubt that iTunes is shipping with this thing.

    3. Re:"iPod killer" my foot, Michael..... by SlashChick · · Score: 2

      I have a 128MB (base) CompactFlash MP3 player that does USB. What is really cool about the USB-based players is that in Windows ME, 2000, and XP, you don't need drivers or special software to interface with the MP3 player. You just plug it into the USB port and voila! Instant drive letter. It's due to a "USB Mass Storage Device" specification that all of these OSes use.

      I can load files onto my MP3 player in a matter of seconds, and I don't need funky software -- just the USB connector and any PC running a recent Windows with a USB port. I have instant expandability via Compact Flash. My MP3 player runs 12 hours on one AA battery, and the USB transfer isn't really that slow (a few minutes to fill up all 128MB.) I don't really listen to my MP3 player except while commuting on the train, so I don't feel the need to cart around a lifetime's worth of MP3s.

      The iPod (and all of these huge MP3 players) are cool. But if you need a quick-and-dirty music and file mover, you can't beat the tiny Compact Flash units. USB is quickly becoming the floppy drive of computers -- sure, it may be slow, but everyone has it. For now, until the iPod or similar players are in the $199 range, I'll be staying with the instant compatibility that a lil Compact Flash player gives me.

    4. Re:"iPod killer" my foot, Michael..... by EvilStein · · Score: 2

      Same with the Mac, basically... but around here what you'll see are people saying that it sucks because it doesn't ship with Linux software, despite the fact that a search on Sourceforge will probably come up with many acceptable results. ;)

      I have a 128mb Rio 500 (2x64mb) and I use it with an older Power Macintosh G3. It's perfect for my many walks around downtown, but for a long drive up to the mountains or a REALLY long hike, I would much prefer the iPod. :-)

    5. Re:"iPod killer" my foot, Michael..... by jarodss · · Score: 1

      The second link, the revue by mp3newswire.com makes the claim about iTunes and Realjukebox.
      Click the link, read the comments, then post a reply.

    6. Re:"iPod killer" my foot, Michael..... by EvilStein · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's the 4th link. :P~

      I guess I was just kind of surprised to see them shipping it with iTunes.
      Then again, the Rio products used to ship with SoundJam, and since that's no longer being produced.... iTunes is the next best alternative.
      There are plenty of Mac mp3 *players* but none of them seem to communicate with these devices, aside from iTunes (and the original SoundJam)

    7. Re:"iPod killer" my foot, Michael..... by hearingaid · · Score: 2
      the Rio products used to ship with SoundJam, and since that's no longer being produced.... iTunes is the next best alternative.

      It could be because most of the SoundJam design team went to work on iTunes... ;)

      Rio shipped with a stripped-down version of SoundJam, complete with mildly annoying ads. Yes, I like iTunes much better.

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  17. design by jrs+1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    what is it with all this non-mac hardware? it's like apple have hired *all* the good minimalist product designers in the world and every other product has to be designed with virtually no sense of style[1]. it's the same for all the iMac-a-like computers and even mobile phones. can someone please design an mp3 player with reasonable specs (which this seems to have) and doesn't look like a NURBS experiment gone wrong?

    [1] noted exeptions: palm's computers and the sony playstation 2

    1. Re:design by yggdrazil · · Score: 1

      Well, me thinks Nokia mobiles has a kind of Apple-like user-friendlyness to them...

    2. Re:design by cgori · · Score: 1

      uh, apple hires IDEO and/or Frog
      all the other companies are cheap-a** bastards who won't pay for the best... except Palm, who hired IDEO.

    3. Re:design by Xthlc · · Score: 1

      > it's like apple have hired *all* the good
      > minimalist product designers in the world and
      > every other product has to be designed with
      > virtually no sense of style

      OK, so the ID might not be much on the Riot,
      but did you check out the interface demo?

      It may not be minimalist, but with just a few
      extra items (play new, play things i haven't
      listened to for a while, etc) they've captured
      several listening patterns that are very common
      and VERY difficult to compose from simpler
      interface operations.

      I was pretty impressed -- I think they've struck
      a far better features / simplicity balance
      than apple managed with the iPod
      (although the riot's equalizer is pretty lame).

    4. Re:design by Concertina · · Score: 1

      Like Apple, Nokia Mobile Phones actually invests time, expertise, and money into usability :)

      It's the reason I own a Nokia, and the reason I'll seriously consider buying an ipod once linux HSF+ support is a little less alpha and the ipod interface has been reverse-engineered.

  18. Thomson, not Thompson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It even says so in the linked pages...

    (Just some schlub who works for Thomson, although in a very different branch.)

  19. Battery life by madenosine · · Score: 1

    Anybody notice the fact that they neclected to state the average battery life? In addition, it is USB, and the interface seems to be a little too similar to the iPod's to me...hmm...

    1. Re:Battery life by madenosine · · Score: 1

      Does "over 10 hours" as an average battery life for a device with a hard drive seem a tad too long?

    2. Re:Battery life by lsdino · · Score: 1

      There exists a more informative press release about the Rio Riot. It has a battery life of 10 hours. And apparently it's bundled with iTunes on the Mac. heh...

      Of course, USB sucks... But with 20 gigs of storage, how often do you really need to change the music? let it download overnight once, and then maybe you're swapping out an album here and there...

      Although what's kinda cool is it supporst MP3 and WMA today, is upgradable to other formats later (someone could potentially hack vorbis support in I'd imagine...) but they also plan to add support for Audible, for people who like to listen to books.

    3. Re:Battery life by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      when the buffer is 16MB or 32MB like the iPod, then no. obviously the hard drive is not spinning all the time.

  20. iPod killer? Hardly. by bbum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That it uses a 20GB hard drive means that it is at least twice the size. The 5gb hard drive used in the iPod is significantly smaller than the 2.5inch form factor required by the 20gb drive.

    The Riot has a USB interface... the iPod uses FireWire (1394b). End result? You can completely replace the contents on your iPod in less than 15 minutes. Even loading 5gb onto the Rio is going to take something like 10 hours -- 20gb would likely take something like *two days*.

    It is unbelievably handy/convenient/cool to be able to reload your entire portable music collection in a matter of minutes. I can get up in the morning and select 500+ tracks -- 50 albums or several playlists (depending on how I have things organized) -- based on my mood, desires, whatever... and the iPod is completely reloaded and ready to go by the time I'm out of the shower and ready to catch the train!

    All in a device that slips conveniently into a pocket, is light weight, and incredibly tough. Did you know an iPod bounces when you drop it? Mine does-- and it still works fine.

    Not too mention that having a 5gb FireWire hard drive in my pocket has proven to be damned convenient on numerous occasions. My iPod was used as a temporary holding spot for data or for sneaker net transfers no less than 4 times last week simply because it was the fastest and most convenient way to move the data around! USB wouldn't have cut it-- try moving 1gb of data across a USB bus in under a minute. (Sure, USB 2.0 can do it-- but who has USB 2.0 support on their MP3 player?)

    Don't get me wrong-- the Riot is *very cool*. But it isn't an iPod killer. They are completely different products.

    Personally, I don't need an FM tuner and really don't want a device that doesn't fit in a pocket.

    There will be those that will reply with 'but do you *really* swap your entire playlists on a regular basis? I don't and I don't miss it...'

  21. Who cares? by byran+lei · · Score: 0


    You can now buy a portable AM/FM cdrom player that'll play CDR's you burn at Wal-mart for $39.99. In a few months you'll be seeing versions of these things that'll have support for MP3's burned on CDR's.

    Doesn't this make spending $$$ for a Rio Riot or Lyra Personal Jukebox a wee bit silly?

    1. Re:Who cares? by duren686 · · Score: 1
      --
      Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
    2. Re:Who cares? by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >*cough* [easybuy2000.com]. I meant you'll the same-no brandname players with mp3 support selling at Wal-mart for $39.99 and under. I find the stuff at Wal-mart and K-mart to actually be cheaper than at most of the online sites.

  22. do we really need 20GB by kawaichan · · Score: 1

    I think iPOD is already over killed, I mean, your battery can't even last long enough for all the sounds, I think a perfect mp3 player should have:

    Decent form factor - Small is good, but too small is stupid.

    Decent Storage - 512MB flash is good enough with matching battery life.

    Mutliple format support - OGG, WMA, MP3, MP3Pro

    Expansion - SD Expansion is good enough.

    That's it, that's all I am asking for.

    --

    kawai
    1. Re:do we really need 20GB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huge storage is where mp3 players really come into their own. With 512MB, it's not a whole lot different than having an MD player and a handful of discs, or a discman and a caselogic, or one of those MP3 discmans. The whole thing about large HD based MP3 players is that they aren't simple replacements for walkmans, discmans, and MD players, they are a whole new animal.

      Your whole (or a large subset of your) collection is always with you, and easily accesible through a sane interface, with virtual mixes, hopefully some sort of preference-based shuffle, etc. It's a completely different way of using the device when you have a large disc and a fast sync-connection.

  23. FSF Kit! Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Free Software" User Kit For a limited time only, get your FSF member kit. Each kit includes:
    • one pair sandals / jesus boots (beige, one size fits all) white socks not included
    • fresh roadkill which can be stuck to face with white pvc children's glue
    • humorous computing t-shirt (poorly printed logo and unwashed)
    • various biro pens (chewed)
    • techie book of nostalgic MIT in-jokes which are no longer funny
    • souped up calculator with go-faster stripe and also supports Linux
    • book "Communism : The Red Way"
    • Halitosis Voucher - Buy one garlic based meal, get another free
    All this can be yours for the bargain price of US$99.95 plus $10.95 shipping and handling. Alternatively, you could submit some piss-poor tcp/ip stack code in exchange. Order now, and you could be the talk of the cube farm! Kit comes with everything shown and will be shipped via UPS Ground for maximum damage en-route. Nick The Greek, London
  24. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by bbum · · Score: 1

    [damnit, got cut off]

    >>There will be those that will reply with 'but do >>you *really* swap your entire playlists on a
    >>regular basis? I don't and I don't miss it...'

    Yes-- but do you NOT do it because you wouldn't or because you can't conveniently? In my experience, the use of a device is often defined by the limitations of the device. That you can't conviently swap out all the content doesn't mean you wouldn't do it if you could!

    I swap the entire contents 2 to 3 times a week, on average. I have 100+ GB of high bitrate mp3s encoded from my CD collection and typically grab some random 4.5GB cross section of that ever few days based on mood, desire, or context.

  25. Stop worrying about USB... by jarodss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reading the early comments and seeing everyone complaining about it being USB.

    Take a look at most "pee-cee"s today, how many have Firewire? Most people don't have Firewire, they do have usb though.

    So stop saying that everything needs to be firewire, yes it will take a while to fill a 20gig mp3 player with a usb connection, but how many times are you going to need to reload 20 gigs of music, if your like me you get a few cds a month and rip them at the same time, at that point I have between 2 and 4 hundred megs, and that doesn't take long to transfer with a usb connection when I only have to do it once or twice a month.

    And on a side note, does this thing act as a portable hard drive? I know some of the harddrive/mp3 players do and that would make it even more useful, with my 11 or 12 gigs of mp3 and a divx video or 6 in the rest of the space i'd be set, even my parents have usb on their pc.

    1. Re:Stop worrying about USB... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone is saying they want Firewire most people just want something faster . . .

      There are other options, USB 2 comes to mind.

    2. Re:Stop worrying about USB... by yetiman · · Score: 1

      You've gotta remember that an mp3 player with that much storage is going to appeal mostly to someone who has a huge amount of tracks. More computer-savy people are going to be likely the ones who have that many tracks...and since they are more adept than the general population they would be more likely to have either a firewire card, a firewire enabled sound card or something of that sort.

      It makes no sense to have so much storage but no way to transfer it all in less than a couple of hours.

    3. Re:Stop worrying about USB... by terminal.dk · · Score: 1


      Firewire is cheap these days, and pretty fast (50Mbyte/second) even it its first generation.

      Sony laptops, and most Dells have Firewire these days. And so des camcorders etc. It is a standard.
      And it has the speed we need.

      USB is only designed for mouse and keyboard. Take a webcam, a radio tuner, a sound capture board, an MP3 player, a scanner. Pick any two of these, and you will most likely experience dropouts due to overloading the biandwidth.

    4. Re:Stop worrying about USB... by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Take a look at most "pee-cee"s today, how many have Firewire? Most people don't have Firewire, they do have usb though.

      When I look at my machines here, and also think about what I've got at work, it's pretty clear: these portable players need SCSI interfaces. ;-)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    5. Re:Stop worrying about USB... by guttentag · · Score: 1

      It's true that most PCs don't have Firewire ports, but most people don't feel it's necessary to spend $400 to carry 4,000 songs around with them either. Most people can't even name 4,000 songs, but those who are obsessive enough to manage it might just think Firewire is a worthy investment.

    6. Re:Stop worrying about USB... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      Firewire is cheap these days, and pretty fast (50Mbyte/second) even it its first generation.

      I think people are forgetting how cheap you can get IEEE-1394 interface cards for PC's nowadays. I believe you can get them for around US$40; drivers are available not only for Windows 9x/2000 (Windows XP supports IEEE-1394 natively), but also the latest Linux distributions.

      You want to have IEEE-1394 connections anyway if you want to download videos from MiniDV camcorders or download images from professional-quality digital cameras (such as the much-praised Canon EOS-1D). Indeed, IEEE-1394 has become a de facto replacement for the SCSI interface on higher-end image scanners, too.

  26. USB it too slow, wah!!! Wah!! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

    Um, geez, guys, the first time you copy over ALL your mp3s, why not do it overnight? I mean, this isn't exactly rocket science. How many of you who are complaining about the USB interface on the Rio Riot still use 10 megabit ethernet?

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:USB it too slow, wah!!! Wah!! by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 3, Funny
      How many of you who are complaining about the USB interface on the Rio Riot still use 10 megabit ethernet

      A lot of the people who have iPods with FireWire transfer probably also have a Power Mac, so they have 1000BASE-T ethernet ;)

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    2. Re:USB it too slow, wah!!! Wah!! by GSloop · · Score: 1

      PowerMacs come with Gig Ethernet?

      100BaseT possibly, but I don't think Gig...

      I don't even think the newest PB and PM come with GB, not like they could use it anyhow...the IDE drives couldn't even think of spinning that consistantly.

    3. Re:USB it too slow, wah!!! Wah!! by Dahan · · Score: 1
      PowerMacs come with Gig Ethernet?

      100BaseT possibly, but I don't think Gig...

      Sure they do... since July 2000. The lastest PowerBook G4 comes with GigE too. Sheesh, just check the specs!

      the IDE drives couldn't even think of spinning that consistantly.

      The disk isn't the only place to get data from... but even so, just stick in a 64-bit Ultra160 SCSI card or two, and hook up a stack of disks. PowerMac G4s have 64-bit/33MHz PCI slots.

    4. Re:USB it too slow, wah!!! Wah!! by GSloop · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected - not that it matters.

      GigE is way over-hyped except for Servers. I don't want users on my networks even thinking about consuming GigE!

      If you need to throw U-SCSI+RAID in any Mac that is pulling or pushing data through a net that isn't a server, your're smoking dope... I can't think of a use for GigE except for data centers - possibly a render farm or something...

      Anyway - I was wrong...I just don't follow Mac's much, in terms of hardware specs.

    5. Re:USB it too slow, wah!!! Wah!! by Dahan · · Score: 1
      GigE is way over-hyped except for Servers.

      Yeah, I agree... while you could make a decent server out of the PowerMacs (and I think the PowerMac Servers are substantially the same hardware), I have no idea why you'd want GigE on the Powerbook... Maybe Apple got a good deal on the PHYs or something :)

      But yeah, none of this thread really matters... I just think it'd be good if you (and the Slashdot editors, and other /. posters, and everyone else in the world :) did at least a small bit of fact-checking before making statements that you're not sure of. For instance, a Google search for powermac gigabit returns Apple's PowerMac page as the top result, with an excerpt that says, "...built-in Gigabit Ethernet..." You wouldn't even have to click on the link; shouldn't add even a minute of your time to do... anyways, that's my pet peeve :)

    6. Re:USB it too slow, wah!!! Wah!! by GSloop · · Score: 1

      True, it peeves me too sometimes...

      [But]
      I didn't state it as a fact...I asked... [Grin]

      Anyhow, I'll try a bit of 15 second google checking next time!

      Thanks

  27. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can fill my iPod in about 10 minutes . . . I could fill the Rio Riot in about 3.8 hours . . .

    Hm? Decisions . . .Decisions . . .

    I really don't see this as an iPod killer in anyway!

  28. Size/Weight, and iPod by pneuma_66 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After reading the article, and reading sonicblue's page, i still couldnt find two key specs for this machine, size and weight. I really think that this is because that the iPod is much smaller and weighs much less.

    I own an iPod, and I prefer having a tiny device, that i can fit in my pocket, or even in the cellphone compartment on my bag. Also, the riot is still USB, i couldnt even imagine how long it would take to fill up the drive. I have a hard time waiting for the three or four minutes it takes to fill up my ipod.

    Everyone also says that the 5gb on the ipod is not enough, and i thought that also, until i got one. I can hold around 700 songs encoded at 192k on the hard drive, which is 2 days worth of music. Now when are you going to listen to the complete 8 days worth of music on your Riot?

    1. Re:Size/Weight, and iPod by donarb · · Score: 1

      A German site has these dimensions: 13.3 cm x 9.5 cm x 3.2 cm, weight 290 g. By contrast, the iPod is 10.2 cm x 6.1 cm x 1.9 cm, weight 185g.

    2. Re:Size/Weight, and iPod by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
      ...2 days worth of music. Now when are you going to listen to the complete 8 days worth of music...?

      Hell, you're right! What did I buy all these hundreds of CDs for? Wait right there - I'm going to throw most of them in the bin right now! I never have more than an hour or two at a time to listen to music, so one or two CDs should be all I need...

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  29. Didn't Atari make one of these? by Lally+Singh · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    I swear I've seen this device before. My younger brother used to play video games on it. It had the thinnest cartridges... And as everyone's pointed out, iPod killer my hairy ass...

    --
    Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    1. Re:Didn't Atari make one of these? by pneuma_66 · · Score: 2

      You are thinking of the atari lynx. I had one also, it was the best portable out at the time, it blew away the gameboy, and game gear. too bad atari ruined it with their fabulous marketing.

    2. Re:Didn't Atari make one of these? by doooras · · Score: 0

      isn't there a purple version of these that can also be used as a controller for the Gamecube?

    3. Re:Didn't Atari make one of these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Lynx was superior to the GameBoy in the same way that wince pocket pcs are superior to palm IIIs.

      Face it, Atari's marketing didn't kill the Lynx, horrible design did. Until the remodeling, the mofo was huge, the screen was very low-res and easily washed out, and the battery life was nothing to write home about, unless you like sending sob stories to your family. How is somebody supposed to get around those problems, no matter how powerful the thing was?

  30. Notice how... by nicwolff · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ...they avoid giving its dimensions among the specs -- or showing it in a user's hands? If this thing is much bigger than the iPod, then the hell with it. And FireWire is a necessity.

    And the Lyra -- hell, the picture in the article makes it look like it's about the size of my head! Kidding, but the article says it weighs twice what the iPod does, so the hell with it too.

    That said, when someone ships one of these suckers can copy songs over FireWire unit-to-unit, I'll hock my iPod and switch!

  31. I want a 0gb MP3 player by KILNA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd much rather have a wireless network connected device capable of streaming the music off of my home machine and various other places on the net based off of my listening preferences. The thing I like about the radio is its ability to introduce me to new music. The thing I hate about the radio is its complete inability to know my preferences. Freeamp is a step in the right direction, but I still haven't managed to get any decent recommendations from it. Music Match makes an attempt as well, but their interface is practically unusable to me. And neither recommendation system is in the form of a net-enabled portable unit yet. *sigh*

    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
    1. Re:I want a 0gb MP3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like this?

      http://40th.com/wce/iplay/

      iPlay iPAQ mp3 player

      iPlay shows just how cool the iPAQ and Pocket PC 2002 can get. iPlay features include a 16-band equalizer w/DSP 50 Hz bass boost, a linear 64-step volume control w/full control mode at low battery levels, balance & gain controls, L/R channel swap control w/enhanced stereo modes; easy-to-use file selection, play lists; plenty of stats and adjustments to make the best use of on-battery time, especially w/microdrives; analog and bar-segment VU meters; network/Wi-Fi file play, remote control of winamp; plus lots more including Load'n'Decode completion technology for quick play even w/multi-MB cache sizes. Plays MP3, PCM, and GSM-610 formats. Full details are in the complete User Guide below. Screenshots there and at the right.

    2. Re:I want a 0gb MP3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A wireless network mp3 player? Wow! That is so useful! What an amazing portable device that would be! For all of.. oh 100 metres from your home.

      Sarcasm aside, wouldn't it be amazing if everyone had wireless networks and publicly available mp3 shares? You could take your wireless mp3 player and hear all sorts of weird stuff in different places :-) It'd make walking round NYC a lot of fun!

  32. Remember: PC Software for iPod! by rbruels · · Score: 2, Informative
    Everyone says the iPod is only Mac-compatible... you need XPlay by MediaFour. Then you can use your iPod on a PC -- under Windows, anyhow. No Linux support yet, but I know some enterprising programmer will release software soon.

    MediaFour had a demo of XPlay at MacWorld, running on XP, and I have to admit it was pretty sexy.

    --

    "All your base are belong to this file I send in order to have your advice."
    1. Re:Remember: PC Software for iPod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only did they have a demo they also released a public trial version of the software . . .

      It works really well.

    2. Re:Remember: PC Software for iPod! by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Too bad it can't remove songs from the iPod, it only has the ability to add them.

    3. Re:Remember: PC Software for iPod! by Hollinger · · Score: 1

      Even under a Mac, you can't transfer songs off of the device. That's Apple's concession to the record labels, I suppose. You can just delete them, or reload them.

  33. slashdot has math majors now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That it uses a 20GB hard drive means that it is at least twice the size."

    Wow, yeah, it's at least three times the size too. It's actually exactly four times the size, however.

  34. An FM Tuner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, if you had 20GB of MP3s in your pocket, would you ever want to listen to FM radio?

    1. Re:An FM Tuner? by SuperGordito · · Score: 1

      Because there's new music every day and radio is the first place good new music appears

    2. Re:An FM Tuner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's new music everyday, but not on the radio, which, as far as ClearChannel owned stations are concerned, only add three new songs per week.

    3. Re:An FM Tuner? by duren686 · · Score: 1
      good new music


      What radio have you been listening to?
      --
      Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
    4. Re:An FM Tuner? by marmoset · · Score: 1
      radio is the first place good new music appears


      Um, you forgot to search your post and replace every incidence of the words "first place" with the phrase "absolute last fucking place in the universe"
  35. Looks good, but... by cosmicg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm holding out for the inclusion of "Amplitude Modulation" technology. I read a preview of it in the July 1899 issue of American Electrician-- it looks like it will be *the* format for christian and sports talk broadcasts.

    --
    Cache Rules Everything Around Me
  36. This thing is big and ugly and useless by Durindana · · Score: 1

    iPod killer? Yeah, right. There seems to be no dimensions information on sonicblue's site... hmm. I wonder why not? It looks like a damn Atari Jaguar, and it probably has a 3.5" HD, making it MUCH cheaper to make (as well as bigger and heavier) than the iPod.

    And as others have already cogently pointed out:

    USB.

  37. Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let's see. USB is 12 megabits per second. Let's say that's 1 megabyte per second.

    Now, 20 gigabytes is 20,000 megabytes. So it'd take 20,000 seconds to fill the hard drive in the Riot. How long is 20,000 seconds? Well, let's do some math here.

    There are 60 seconds in a minute, and 60 minutes in an hour. That makes 3600 seconds in an hour. 3600 goes into 20,000 roughly 5 times.

    So it'd take about 5 HOURS to fill the thing, not TWO DAYS! Let's get our math straight first before we make declarative statements about the product.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  38. rio by crystalplague · · Score: 1

    bah, i'm still kickin it hardcore with my Diamond Rio...old school baby. 32MB? who would ever need more than that?

    1. Re:rio by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Me too, but I'm living it large with 64 megs. And all because of Audible.com.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:rio by David+Price · · Score: 1

      And while we're at it, who needs a battery case that actually holds the battery in? :)

      (Happened to myself and a friend of mine. My Rio now sports a fashionable duct-tape reinforcement on the battery holder.)

    3. Re:rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try some rubber band!

  39. Too bulky, but has an interesting feature by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    I saw a picture of this being handled on TechTV, and it's much bulkier than the iPod. The iPod is a far more convenient form-factor for a portable player, IMO, and I predict that the Rio Riot's sales will suffer for that reason. That said, it has an interesting feature that the iPod lacks: it will create a favorites list based on your usage, which the TechTV guy loved.

  40. iPod interface by elchulopadre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In terms of interface, I find it hard to believe that the iPod can be easily topped. I've had mine since thanksgiving, and have been fascinated by it.

    Not only is it awesome as an mp3 player (excellent sound quality, great battery life, fast connection, high capacity), or as an external hd (I've used it to fix broken macs by booting off it). What I find most impressive of all is the fact that its ui is unbelievably efficient at getting you to the song, playlist, artist, album, etc. you want to hear.

    In terms of usability and 'learning curve', my grandfather figured out how to use it in about 3 minutes, without my telling him anything about it. Granted, he limited himself to the gigabyte-or-so that I have of classical music, but still, he was impressed at how easy it was to use.

    The Riot seems to be a slick little machine, and its 20 gb are very impressive. But, as people have already mentioned, 20 gb over USB are worth more than a few coffee breaks' wait...

    Not to discredit the Riot's interface, but the jog dial doesn't let you go all the way around, which wouldn't let you really speed up (crucial element of iPod's navigation), and the buttons aren't in the center of the dial, but off to the side, so you'd have to take your thumb off the dial, move it up or down and push accordingly, as opposed to having the main button right there and the others right around the dial. In addition, the Riot seems to require 2-handed operation. On the other hand, though, the larger screen is impressive, and the hints at a graphical interface as opposed to a text-driven one make me quite curious.

    The fact that I can do everything I could possibly want to with one hand on my iPod (with one finger, mind you) is one of the most fascinating aspects of the interface. And FireWire makes it all manageable. As soon as I get a new CD and rip it, I update my playlists and within seconds I'm good to go, new music and all. I'm very happy with my iPod, as you could have guessed. But it would be stupid to say that it's unsurpassable. It's just very difficult, but my eyes are open...

    1. Re:iPod interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "but the jog dial doesn't let you go all the way around" - yes it does spin all the way around so you can go as fast or as slow as you want

      "so you'd have to take your thumb off the dial, move it up or down and push accordingly" - not really, move it with the bottom of your thumb while pressing with the tip.

      "the Riot seems to require 2-handed operation" - left side has play controls (play, stop etc) while right side has menu navigation controls.

  41. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by foqn1bo · · Score: 1

    You can completely replace the contents on your iPod in less than 15 minutes.

    400Mb/sec / 8 = 50MB/sec 5000Mb/50Mb/sec = 100 sec 100 seconds actually. Not that this negates any of the good points you brought up in your post, but damn. Just a little over a minute and a half. You could replace an entire 20gb hard drive in a little over 6.5 minutes.

  42. rio dj (slightly ot) by Webz · · Score: 1

    I'm not too sure about the transfer speed of USB but I really like the Rio DJ function. RioDJ basically chooses songs for you (a supplement to personal playlists) by frequency of play, newly added music, songs of a certain decade, at random, etc... I hate wading through 2000 songs, because I end up playing them same 10 or so each time around. I don't think a function like this (of automated playlists) exists on the iPod. So, that's a plus.

  43. In dash HD based MP3 player by vw_bob · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is this: When will we get a good, preferably in-dash, hard drive based MP3 player for the car? You know, it could be done many ways, actually. Any of these companies could easily adapt the power supply for these devices to a standard 12 volts and then make the hard drive portion removable to bring in house and "sync up" via usb/firewire, whatever.

    This would preferably also have a CD player in dash that could play regular as well as MP3 cds.

    Hell, they could actually create a trunk mounted MP3 unit designed for use in car, similar to car CD changers.

    I guess there's the Rio Car, but this is a little pricey a (imho) rather ugly design.

    You see all sorts of kits with small computers mounted in trunks hooked up though power inverters, etc. You could also get a cigarette lighter adaptor for any of these jukeboxes. But none of these are eloquent solutions to a problem that really already HAS a solution.

    Message To Big Audio Company: I want my entire (400+) CD collection in my dash or trunk in MP3 format. I want large drives (20gigs +). I want it cheap ( $600), I want it pretty. I want it flexible. (Upgrades/Add-ons?) And I want it NOW!

    1. Re:In dash HD based MP3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It already exists and I love mine.

      Neo Car Jukebox

    2. Re:In dash HD based MP3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why you don't want a riocar. it can hold 2 hard drives (up to 60 gigs on current models), the 60 gig model is $500. The blue display is nice. It has a tuner module as an addon, and you can upgrade the hard drive. It has ethernet and serial for upgrades.

      It's main problem is that they are not making them any more and this is the last of the stock

    3. Re:In dash HD based MP3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were recently selling them for $199 for 10G models. Um, check ebay for $350-400 deals.

  44. Yesss! An iPod Killler! by phloda · · Score: 3, Funny

    I did a quick comparison of the old iPod to Sonic Blue's new Rio RIOT. Although tech specs are still forthcoming, the Flash technology tour of the Rio RIOT made it easy to tell that this is absolutely an iPod killer.

    old iPod: One Boring Scroll Wheel, 5 buttons

    Rio RIOT: Scroll Wheel, Game-Boy Pointer, and five buttons, including two on the left side for volume!

    old iPod: IE1394 (what issat?)

    Rio RIOT: USB! Everyone has it! Soon it will be five times as fast with USB2 technology!

    old iPod: looks like a zippo, sized like pack of cigarrettes

    Rio RIOT: ergonomically styled like Game Boy Advance, in sleek charcoal plastique!

    old iPod: select by artist, album, or manual playlist

    Rio RIOT: intellegent audio wizard detects your favorites and plays them back for you!

    old iPod: made by Apple, a company going out of business

    Rio RIOT: produced by Sonic Blue, a recognized leader in MP3 technology!

    I think the message is clear. Sonic Blue has an iPod killer on it's hands with the Rio RIOT. Thank you Slashdot for letting us know quick!

    1. Re:Yesss! An iPod Killler! by smack_attack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have IE1394 (firewire) on my Compaq laptop. It's not as uncommon as you think, it's just been slow to be adopted.

    2. Re:Yesss! An iPod Killler! by optout · · Score: 1

      This killer, that killer. Does it really matter? I mean, I just don't understand why a new MP3 player with a bigger hard drive has to suddenly be turned into an iPod Killer. Why target Apple? There are other MP3 players out there that use a hd for storage that aren't endorsed by Cupertino. I just don't get why everything has to be automatically against Apple. Please enlighten. FWIW, I use BSD, RH, and OSX daily depending on what is needed to be done. Lets not regress into a religeous war here.

    3. Re:Yesss! An iPod Killler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems what you really want is a gameboy, not an emptythree player. As for fire wire, even my old p166 has that (orange card with usb & fire on the same)

    4. Re:Yesss! An iPod Killler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      old iPod: made by Apple, a company going out of business

      Rio RIOT: produced by Sonic Blue, a recognized leader in MP3 technology!


      Hmmm...

      According to mp3newswire, 650,000 portable mp3 players were sold last year. This number includes 125,000 iPods, which were only available after November 10.

      So, more than 20 percent of all portable mp3 players sold last year were made by Apple, who had less than 10 percent of the year to actually sell them and no experience in the mp3 hardware market.

      Apple has more than proved their ability to be an able competitor here. I look forward to seeing the numbers after an entire year of sales and the inevitable hardware refresh.



    5. Re:Yesss! An iPod Killler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not.

      This would concern me, but it's ok. If you're being sincere, it's not a very good argument. And if you're being facetious, you need a better sense of humor. Maybe you could enlighten us?

    6. Re:Yesss! An iPod Killler! by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      usb2 is indeed faster than usb1.

      but the rio riot uses USB1

      usb2 is not a standard interface type on any commercial pc.

      firewire, by the way, has been an apple standard interface for 3 years and on sony (as "iwire") for 2 years.

      firewire cards cost about the same as USB2 cards, but until you have a large user base out there who already have the damn ports on their computers, don't expect to see a lot of USB2 devices. hell, if it weren't for the iMac, there still might not be many USB1 devices ;-)

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    7. Re:Yesss! An iPod Killler! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* sarcasm *cough*

  45. Riot by lavaforge · · Score: 2

    The Rio Riot seems like a good idea, but I'd personally like to see a wireless NIC and some P2P software built in. Imagine sharing files automatically by just walking around...

    1. Re:Riot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an excellent idea...
      I want one...

  46. Why are these things still costing 400 dollars? by t0qer · · Score: 2

    400 dollars is a lot to pay for a 20 gig hard drive and some electronics. I got a solution to the price problem.

    Look at your hard drive, just grab one, any of them. Turn it over, thats nice.. Now look at the electronics on the other side.

    I see a 256k ram buffer chip. I see a microcontroller. I see various other parts and pieces that tell me that with a few changes in the PCB layout, there is NO reason hard drives couldn't be factory shipped with the ability to play MP3's. The hard drive im looking at is an ancient quantum 240 meg drive too. Just add your own battery and case and voila.

    If maxtor, seagate, or any other ppl from a hard drive company is reading this post, please pressure you boss into doing this. It would give you a place to sell hard drives other than in computers.

    1. Re:Why are these things still costing 400 dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PCMCIA form factor 5gb toshiba firewire hd's (like the one in the iPod) cost $400 retail. You get the LCD, the batteries, the software, the 32MB RAM, the decoding chips, the opamp, the headphone port, headphones, firewire cable, and whatever else for free.

    2. Re:Why are these things still costing 400 dollars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      256k ram buffer? Have fun listening to your music for 30 minutes until the continuous hard drive activity runs the battery out.

  47. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The Riot has a USB interface... the iPod uses FireWire (1394b). End result? You can completely replace the contents on your iPod in less than 15 minutes. Even loading 5gb onto the Rio is going to take something like 10 hours -- 20gb would likely take something like *two days*.

    That's FUD.

    It took me 11 hours to put all 34 gigs of my music on an external USB drive for my car.

    You've bough into Job's marketing hype. He's managed to convince you that the Firewire interface alone is enough to overlook the price premium.

    Yes, the iPod looks cool, and transfers files fast, but it costs way too much compared to what you get with this Rio Riot.

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  48. Anger at Apple?!?!?! by toupsie · · Score: 2
    It looks to me like an iPod killer

    Everything has to be compared violently to Apple, eh? Kill the iMac and kill the iPod! :)

    What might be a killer product but not an iPod killer is the Jukebox Multimedia - Portable Entertainment Center. Archos makes some interesting products. I have an Archos Jukebox 6000 but now use an iPod -- its nice but the size and firewire device of the iPod make it my choice. The Jukebox Multimedia - Portable Entertainment Center is a handheld entertainment center, which combines an MP3 and WMA music player and recorder, plus built-in microphone, photo album and carousel, still camera and camcorder, plus video player and recorder according to their web site. The player has a 10 Gig hard drive. It uses USB 1.0, USB 2.0 and Firewire for transfering information back and forth. It even has a little LCD window to view pictures and movies on the device. Looks like it is the same size as the Riot. Could be a nice data wallet/purse.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  49. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t, just mod 'em up. It's informative....

  50. Not quite there, but almost by HawaiianMayan · · Score: 1

    It's not as beautifully simple as an iPod, but it's not ugly either.

    If the picture of it sitting next to headphones is to scale, it's about the size of a videocassette.

    It uses USB instead of FireWire, but as much as I love my iPod, that's not as big an argument as some people would have you think. Once you get the entire library on there (spend an hour or so with USB), everything else is just delta updates.

    A 20GB hard drive is NICE. I'm already resenting managing the playlists on my pod to keep under 5GB. On the other hand, it ensures I only hear my favourite music on the road ;)

    The price isn't really competitive, so basically what you're getting is a much larger hard drive in a much larger package. And PC compatibility out of the box, for you poor benighted PC-using souls ;)

    So, not quite an iPod killer, but should give Apple pause about the price of the pod.

  51. CF MP3 Player? by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

    Neither of these impressed me much. They're hideous next to an iPod.

    Anyone know of a CompactFlash based MP3 player? CF type I is now coming in sizes up to 1GB, and could be used to make an absolutely TINY device. (never mind the power-hungry IBM Microdrives)

    1. Re:CF MP3 Player? by shrewmy · · Score: 0

      I have a Lyra2 player, it uses CompactFlash... I got it for Christmas, and I'm still running off the original batteries, and I probably used it an average of 30 mins a day since I got it. It's about the size of a pack of cigarettes I guess but thinner, which isn't that big. It's the only mp3 player I've ever used, but I'd recommend it. The only problem is the headphones it comes with aren't that great.

    2. Re:CF MP3 Player? by illaqueate · · Score: 1

      http://www.sandisk.com/tech/comp.asp

      select "Digital Audio Players" as device type.

      I have a rio500 so i use 128mb smartmedia. I'm hoping they make a 256 soon..

    3. Re:CF MP3 Player? by bingeldac · · Score: 1

      Personally I use the Nex II from FrontierLabs( link). For a mere $100 bucks you get a device that will run all CF cards (including the MicroDrive) and can act as portable drive. A word of caution: MircoDrives SUCK battery. The 1GB is much better then the 340mb, but it is still a lot of power suckage. I would suggest getting a 512mb CF card.

    4. Re:CF MP3 Player? by krazyninja · · Score: 1
      Have you ever heard of the cost of these "tiny" CF devices? They are ~500$++, and still not available in the market. And you expect somebody to buy them when media as cheap as a few cents are available NOW??

      --
      "Do something man. Right now."
    5. Re:CF MP3 Player? by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      Thanks man. I do think I'll buy one. At $109 it would be silly not to. Especially since I've extra CF cards around, having upgraded my camera's primary CF card several times.

      Too bad they're sold out 'till March...

  52. But where is Vorbis support? was Re:Anger at Apple by emptybody · · Score: 1

    So where is the vorbis support in this wonder box?

    --
    comment directly in my journal
  53. Does the RioVolt even _play_ MP3's???!!!! by joetee · · Score: 1

    Look at the webpage(s): no mention of MP3, period.
    Just because is's mentioned on MP3 newswire doesn't mean its not a SDMI earwig music player!

    I'd love to be wrong about this, but look for yourself. Alas no mention of VogOrbis either...

    --
    Joe Torre - X - HardwareEngineer @ Amiga Inc & ZapMedia Amiga, AmigaDE, BeOS, Linuxz, QNX, Rebol, Windoze, ZME: So
  54. I've got news for *both* Apple and Rio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USB *and* Firewire SUCK...

    I want bluetooth. no wires, thank you..

    Bluetooth not fast enough... ok, put in 802.11a

    Recharge? make the back side solar and add a wind-up freewheel dynomo. screw fuelcells and chargers.

    I want my tunes if the gird goes out and civilation goes down the tube.

    not survivalist ready? fsck your product.

  55. iPod Killer? Go smoke some more crack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing this POS has on the iPod is storage. In fact they should rebrand it as iPOS. To all you broke ass suckers who complain about the iPod's price, get a real job!

    Why the Riot isn't cool:

    The interface is clunky

    Doesn't work seamlessly with iTunes

    USB interface, see how long it takes to put 20gb on this turd

    Can't be used as fast hard drive to store files

    Size, I seriously doubt it's as small as the iPod

    Battery life, I get well over 10 hours on my iPod, what does this thing get? My iPod can recharge right from my Mac, it doesn't even need to be plugged into the wall socket.

    Appearance, the Riot is butt ugly and that's my opinion as a design professional

  56. Priced Competitively? by SuperMacNinja · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So everyone complains that the iPod is overpriced at $399 but this Rio product is "priced competitively" at $399? This just blows my mind.

    1. Re:Priced Competitively? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's think about this: $400 for 5 GB or 20GB. Hmmm.. tough decision...

    2. Re:Priced Competitively? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Welcome to /., oddly everyone can afford a $399 mp3 player but not a $40 firewire card.

    3. Re:Priced Competitively? by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

      $400 for 5GB in a pack of cards or 20GB in a house brick. Tough one indeed...

    4. Re:Priced Competitively? by nemui-chan · · Score: 1

      Priced competively yes. $399 for 5 gigs or 20 gigs. $399 for 15 minutes to fully load the hard drive on the mp3 player or about 30 HOURS to load the hard drive on the player... go fig. :)

  57. RioRiot Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a picture of someone holding a RioRiot, for
    some sense of the size:

    http://www.winsupersite.com/images/reviews/ces02 _0 7.jpg

  58. Never again, SonicBlue by zbuffered · · Score: 1

    SonicBlue has joined ATI on my shitlist. My RioVolt, which is a great MP3 CD player, broke, and they WILL NOT honor the warranty. The don't even tell me they won't, but the e-mail address they tell you to use for technical support only responds with form letters, requests for RMA are ignored, and the customer support people, who you need to call 3 different numbers and wait on hold for 30 minutes to talk to, are unable to issue RMAs. What they do is they request RMA numbers, which are never issued. I've made multiple calls, and they are completely unable, or possibly unwilling, to honor my warranty. So I'll never buy their products again, and if I can convince somebody on /. to do the same, all the better.

    --
    Synergy is your friend
    1. Re:Never again, SonicBlue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are Soooo right. These bastards will not honor any warranty work. The "better business bureau" is NOT an organization you use AFTER getting shafted. You use those lamers before you shell out the bucks. Sonic Blue is a bunch of frauds. Talk to your State's Attourney General about prohibiting those Sonic Blue MEanies from selling to your State. Hit those assholes in the WALLET.

  59. You ALL miss the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Choosing any AUDIO device shoule be based on one thing first and foremost: HOW DOES IT SOUND? EVERYTHING else is SECONDARY. Sure, it may have 20 megs, a cool interface, and might just have enough cool factor to show off to your friends. But if it sounds like AM radio, it's a piece of crap.

    1. Re:You ALL miss the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My hearing is gone from rock concerts, surfing, drugs, running chainsaws, flying aircraft, putting rounds down range and generally living a high-gain lifestyle that makes yours look like a still-life painting... anyway, your hearing will eventually go as well (age strikes *everyone* except those who die young).

      All I *really* require from a music playback is that it overcomes the background threshold for my Tinnitus.

      BTW, I turn 30 today...

  60. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by zzyzx · · Score: 1

    yeah but if you get a 30 or 40 gig drive in your neo player, you never have to refresh your contents.

  61. Too bad it can't get cheaper right now by denjin · · Score: 1

    You might want to check on how much the drive alone goes for in the iPod. I'm sure it will go down once demand increases, but right now I believe the bare drive is about $399...

    1. Re:Too bad it can't get cheaper right now by rhost89 · · Score: 1

      $399 for a 5GB 2.5" laptop hard drive??? Your joking right. A 48GB 2.5 in hard drive goes for around $350.

      --
      I will bend your mind with my spoon
    2. Re:Too bad it can't get cheaper right now by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Think about it, pal. The iPod can't use a 2.5" (9.5mm profile) hard drive when it is itself about the size of a 2.5" drive. It uses a 1.8" (5mm profile) Toshiba drive which was originally designed for use as a PCMCIA hard drive.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Too bad it can't get cheaper right now by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Tell me how to fit a 2.5" HD into the iPod, that is only 2.43" wide? Could you at least check the most basic information before you post?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    4. Re:Too bad it can't get cheaper right now by denjin · · Score: 1

      Did you even read my post? It doesn't use a 2.5" laptop hard drive. It uses a 1.8" one, and it is made by Toshiba and is ONLY in a 5gb size now. The street price (for end-users) is the same price as the iPod!.

      Sheesh.

  62. Re:But where is Vorbis support? was Re:Anger at Ap by toupsie · · Score: 2
    So where is the vorbis support in this wonder box?

    So, what, you and two of your friends that actually use vorbis can play your music? Face it, Vorbis is a failure in the music compression market. It has not light fire one under anyone's butt yet. I am not about to re-encode my 400 CDs with Vorbis. MP3 does the job.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  63. It's bigger though... by denjin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Still, they're using a laptop hard drive. The HD used by the iPod costs (to a normal end-user) about the same price as the iPod itself...

    I guess they could have released an iPod at a cheaper price w/more storage, but then it'd be just as large as the other options out there.

  64. Look big... by stripes · · Score: 2
    The only question is -- how big is this thing?

    Well, if their pictures are to scale looking at it and the headphones makes me think it is roughly the size of a paperback book, which makes sense if you look at all the crap they cram on the display. If it were iPod sized there would be about four lines of text (they rotated the display).

    To me that makes it basically useless. I use the iPod when running, when waling the dog, and sometimes if I have to wait in line. If I'll be somewhere I can lug around that thing I may as well take my laptop which also has all my music, and some other diversions. Maybe other people will have some other focus for the device and like it better, but to me a portable music player should really be portable, not luggable.

    The iPod also has a few other nice, but not killer features that this thing seems to lack.

  65. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh, sorry, a day and a half.

    Seriously though - do you all really have 20 gigs of MP3s??? I've been collecting for a few years now, mind you, not every MP3 in sight, and I DO have a job, so I buy CDs too. I've got a total of about a gig and a half of stuff that's of good quality, and worth (IMHO) keeping.

    34 gigs of music? You've either got far too much time on your hands, no life, have never bought a CD - ever, and just download everything. That's wacky.

  66. Here's an image with some scale by mike_lynn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Find it here.
    Apparently it's from the 2002 International CES. The page it's from is in Japanese, but has several other pics showing front/back/side.

    Oh, here's one more, even closer up, from SuperSite.

    1. Re:Here's an image with some scale by extra88 · · Score: 1

      Finally a useful post! That Rio Riot is pretty small, I was envisioning something about the size of a paperback book. Unfortunately it's still on the wrong side of the "shirt pocket" threshhold which is the clincher for a lot of iPod buyers.

      There are a lot of different MP3 devices out there and variations and improvements come around all the time. The most interesting devices (and this is not just about MP3 players) are the ones which let you do something you couldn't do before. The iPod is such a device, it combines the portability of a solid state player with the capacity of a hard drive player so you can listen to music all day, never hear a repeat, and do it with your hands free and without belt-strapped equipment pulling your pants down.

      Apple doesn't have a monopoly on those tiny Toshiba drives. Someone else will use them and make a device that competes with the iPod on its own terms. Until that time, Apple is going to charge a premium. I don't have the kind of money I feel is necessary to spend it on an iPod but more power to those who do.

  67. MP3PRO by xercist · · Score: 1

    Is nothing to be bragging about. All it is is low-bitrate mp3 with a horrible (something like 10kHZ) lowpass. The decoder then tries to *guess* at the high frequencies.

    It's not much of a surprise that it really doesn't sound that good.

    I'll wait for a good player with vorbis support.

    --

    --
    grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
  68. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by denjin · · Score: 1

    For one, how many people are like you and have 34gb of music in MP3s? I might have that much if I copied all of my CDs to MP3s I suppose, but I never listen to them all....anyway.

    Plus, he has not convinced everyone that firewire alone is worth the price premium... I think it is worth a little premium, as if you've ever used an iPod, music copying is almost instantaneous on a song-by-song basis, for my measly 1gb collection, it's extremely fast.

    And lastly, again, the HD in the iPod is not a normal 2.5" HD. Go to apple and check out the tech specs. That is the main reason for the price, imho (even if Apple stuff does cost more on average).

  69. iPod is not an MP3 player by moyix · · Score: 1

    Think about this for a second: the iPod has a ludicrous amount of memory (32M--as much as the *storage* space on the original Rio. Enough that you could whack it repeatedly on the ground with no skipping), it works as a portable hard drive, it has a general CPU (not just an mp3-decoding chip, upgradable firmware (meaning you ogg freaks ;) will probably be supported in the near future), and a screen that looks like it could do quite a bit more than text.

    Now, you have this powerful, software-upgradeable machine with a good screen and a good interface. Is *anyone* else thinking that Apple might eventually release a "PDA" upgrade to this thing, once it's gotten a foothold among the MP3 crowd? I think that Jobs is positioning this to be much more than just an MP3 player, but rather an extensible part of his "digital hub". Even the name, iPod, has no musical connotations whatsoever.

    Or maybe I'm just a conspiracy theorist... ;)

    1. Re:iPod is not an MP3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of lacking input options isn't it - unless the Apple specs people forgot to mention the touch sensitive screen.....

    2. Re:iPod is not an MP3 player by rob.eberhardt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apparently it's hackable in some surprising ways - found this article about a device introduced at MacWorld SF that turns your iPod into a smart IR remote control.

    3. Re:iPod is not an MP3 player by biglig2 · · Score: 2

      Did you notice it has an easter egg in it? It plays breakout ;-)

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    4. Re:iPod is not an MP3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hey idiot:

      "Enough that you could whack it repeatedly on the ground with no skipping" - They don't use the memory like a CD player does to prevent skipping, instead the songs are loaded into RAM completely before playing. If you whack it hard enough to screw up the hard drive, audio skipping would be the least of your problems.

      "it has a general CPU (not just an mp3-decoding chip, upgradable firmware" - The Riot also has a real CPU and upgradable firmware.

      "screen that looks like it could do quite a bit more than text" - iPod is only 160x128 while Riot is 240x160, more space to do more than text than the iPod.

      Moral of this story, do your homework and get the facts straight before you come in here whining, it only makes you look bad.

  70. Rio/Apple by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    Rio products are fine (I've owned 2), but the difference besides the obvious advantages of firewire and small form factor is that the iPod is actually well constructed. Rio has a long history of cheaply made devices and it shows..no matter how flashy they are.

    The Rio lines have always worked for me just fine, but the craftsmanship of the products themselves lends me to believe that it will be broken inside of a year of normal use.

    1. Re:Rio/Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed - my iPod feels like a solid chunk chipped of a block of granite. This is reinforced by the fact that there are no seams, doors, flaps, screws - nothing. If it weren't for the tiny vibrations felt when the disk spins up I'd swear that it had no moving parts other than the wheel control on the front.

      The sound quality is tops too, with generous helpings of volume -- unlike my Rio.

  71. right on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    what you said makes COMPLETE since and goes right along with another great bit of forward, big picture thinking of our time: "640k ought to be enough for anyone"

    bravo!

  72. Sondra by IceFox · · Score: 2

    Their DJ functionality is vagly similar to my application Sondra that I made this last summer.

    Visit the Sondra website at: http://www.csh.rit.edu/~benjamin/desktop/programs/ sondra/.

    Sondra can be downloaded and used right now without buying any hardware.

    Sondra will create playlists based upon how good the song is (based upon ranking), # of times played, how new it is. i.e. the better a song is the more it will be played.

    And anyone can go and re-compile it for windows if they want.

    -Benjamin Meyer

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    1. Re:Sondra by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      And anyone can go and re-compile it for windows if they want.

      Forgive a poor Windows user for his lack of l33t cross-platform programming sk1llz, but unfortunately I must be the only one who can't. It's sad too, because it seems like exactly what I've wanted for a while now.

    2. Re:Sondra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A playlist based on popularity? Shit, the losers of the world will be playing shitty songs ad nauseum. Nix weenie, er, douche-bag.

  73. iPod killer? by sporty · · Score: 3, Redundant

    Man, the size and weight difference is huge! The only way these devices would kill the iPod is if you dropped them on top of an iPod. And even then you'd have to drop the Rio from a very great height since the fringgin' iPod's are durable.

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  74. Lyra Personal Jukebox by green42 · · Score: 1

    This device actually has a 10GB hard drive (not 20), as mentioned in the RCA press release here:
    http://www.rca.com/content/viewdetail/1,2811,EI700 226-CI258,00.html

  75. ok, i know i'm gonna get flamed, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but here is basically an article that is the exact opposite... Rio Riot a Riot? heh!

  76. Personally... by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

    If thats what you want, check the USB On the go extention to USB2.

    I'd rather just take the (proven, existant, and nearly ubiquitous in the DV world) 1394 interface.

    C-X C-S
    Logic on crapdot? No way!

  77. Great, another product they won't support. by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    I've bought three RIO products in the past 6 months; A RIO receiver, a RIO car, and a RIO PSA play 120.

    Support for these products ended within a month of purchase. No new software or bug fixes are availible for any of these products.

    Will I buy another Sonic Blue product ever? No way!

    -ted

    1. Re:Great, another product they won't support. by BAKup · · Score: 1

      Hey, they're still supporting the Rio Car. The guys in Cambridge are working on the 2.0 software as we speak...Go over to http://www.riocar.org for the best info on that player.

      --Ben
      Who is not speaking for the Cambridge team, but loves his Empeg(Riocar) lots.

    2. Re:Great, another product they won't support. by rixster · · Score: 1

      I agree with the other poster. I love my empeg car stereo. They are releasing new software for it on a regular basis and it is definitely the coolest bit of high tech gadetery I've bought in the last year.
      But it was a bummer that it's now EOL....

      --
      Two wrongs may not make a right, but three ....
  78. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2

    How the hell does something whose math is off by over an order of magnitude get moderated up as insightful?

  79. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2

    For one, how many people are like you and have 34gb of music in MP3s?

    I'll be honest, my personal playlist is about 2500 songs, as a subset of the 9600+ I have total. (That's just the byproduct of buying hundreds of CDs as a dumb kid/teen, for two or three songs that I was willing to listen to.)

    A 20gig portable like the Riot would be the perfect walkman-style device for me, since that would be more than my "preferred music" rotation. But trimming it down to 5 gigs would be a little hard, since I like a lot of variety.

    My point here is, if my passenger wants more music (like an entire REM album as it appears on CD), he can just punch it up on myflatscreen PC in the car. That's why I put all 34 gigs there.

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  80. Re:Huh? [shameless plug] by tomaasz · · Score: 1

    > I don't need to put ALL of my MP3s on it...

    I don't need to..
    I can't !
    20GiB is not enough - maybe 200GiB would do NOW,
    but what about next month? I don't even have time to listen all new music - this thing would not solve that problem, because the new stuff wouldn't fit on it.

    Still waiting for the killer 1TiB player that is as small as a MD player, is unbreakable and has batteries that last at least 48 hours...

    ..and costs $50, of course

  81. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by billybob · · Score: 0

    you are a genius.

    ps: you suck.

    --
    Joseph?
  82. great planning, Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I salute Apple in this endevour. They produced a fantastic product, that instead of being just a simple stand alone product that *can* interfact with your computer. Apple new that they could pull an old trick here(that is most often, but not exclusively, pulled by Microsoft) Basically, by making such a great product that would get tremendous reviews, the very wise expectation is that consumer desire will far outweigh any discust they feel at Apple "pulling such a low" for making it only compatable with Apple products. Rather, the desire for a great MP3 device, could actually drive a secondary consumer demand for Apple computers. After all, that plan of attack has worked VERY well for many in the past. Since the average consumer is too stupid to understand and/or too self centered to care, then it equals $$$ for the company employing the tactic.

    It is great that Apple has not lost its ability to slimily pull money from the sheeps' wallets. Great Job Apple! Any good tactician takes measure of the environment. Here, they know that the talking monkey, no critical thinking, emotionally reactive, herd mentality simpletons out there (self labled as 'geeks') will jump on this bandwagon because it is Apple. Which they erroneously see as an enemy to the technological Antichrist, Microsoft.

  83. patents? by markj02 · · Score: 2

    Isn't SonicBlue the company that has been causing problems with their patents on digital video recorders? I don't think it's good to support them.

    1. Re:patents? by k_187 · · Score: 1

      yeah, but they're compition to APPLE! Duh, I do find it odd how easily /.ers comprise their morals over some new toy(not that I blame them).

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
  84. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2

    34 gigs of music? You've either got far too much time on your hands, no life, have never bought a CD - ever, and just download everything.

    Not so.

    I have legally (and probably blindly) purchased several hundred CDs and boxed sets featuring music that I enjoy over the past 13 years. (In fairness, MANY of these came used from the local CD Warehouse when I was working in a college town.) I have also legally purchased dozens and dozens of cassette tapes and vinyl records.

    I spent about six weeks using my two main PCs to rip the CDs to my local hard drives at 128 kbps.

    I then used file sharing networks (for over a year now) to collect all the music I had on cassette tape and vinyl. That *IS* fair use, right? I purchased the music, I should be able to listen to it in my home or in my car, right?

    Yes, I have previewed music I do not own-- I won't lie. But if I like it enough to listen on a regular basis, I do pay The Cartel their due. (Sadly.)

    I'm still waiting for the revolution where the majority of artists direct-market and end up making more money.

    That's wacky.

    Thanks! :)

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  85. AM Radio by nexex · · Score: 1

    I wish they would make one with an AM radio built-in as well, I've never seen an mp3 player with one...I think it would be nice to be able to listen to talk radio or music on the ride to/from work.

    --
    Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
  86. I will buy: by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    The first portable jukebox that will funtion flawlessly under Linux using standard run of the mill: "insmod usb-storage".

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  87. More info... by vukv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As I can see, many ppl seem to have wrong info about rio riot... so here is some: - It fits palm of your hand - It has lithium ion battery for 10-12 hours of playback (charges 5 hours) - includes fm tuner - big screen (240x160) - every real reviewer who saw it so far said it was the easiest to manage, including ipod - ships with itunes & real jukebox... keep in mind, for ipod, you need to pay extra for Win software - it plays mp3 and wma, no copy protection (sonicblue is known for that anyway) - awesome headphones (for bundled hp) - every reviewer (Cnet, forbes, techtv) said it looked super sleek and was nicely designed overal USB only is a bit of a let down but people please, how many of you are going to upload 20 GB of mp3's every day?

    1. Re:More info... by Pierce · · Score: 1

      Do you have any links for these reviews?

    2. Re:More info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod isn't mentioned in any of those reviews. In fact, they seem to be little more than quick glimpses at the product, and mostly just seem to say how cool HDD-based MP3 players are

    3. Re:More info... by tfoss · · Score: 1
      every real reviewer who saw it so far said it was the easiest to manage, including ipod

      every reviewer (Cnet, forbes, techtv) said it looked super sleek and was nicely designed overal USB only is a bit of a let down but people please

      Care to share any of those reviews? On CNet
      there is nothing useful save 3 user opinions (far too small an n). Forbes reads like nothing more than a press release. Techtv
      is also not terribly in depth nor quite so fawning as you suggest.

      5 Hours to charge? That seems like a bit of a pain to me. Isn't an iPod somewhere around an hour? 10:1 vs 2:1 play to charge ratio is significant.


      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
  88. 20Gb mp3 player? old news. by nchip · · Score: 2

    Pjbox has had a 20Gb mp3 player out for over an year. Why wait for a new player to come, when others use one already?

    --
    signatures pending - ansa@kos.to - (dont mail there)
  89. a matter of demand by Kenshin · · Score: 1

    What will it take to get them to support vorbis !?!?!?!

    Actual demand.

    Out of all the people out there who want to buy an MP3 player, perhaps 0.1% have actually heard of "Ogg Vorbis". Outside of the Slashdot community, I have not seen it mentioned once.

    It's called an MP3 Player for a reason: people buy them to play MP3s. These profit-concious companies aren't going to start building in support for obscure formats just to appease a vocal extreme-minority.

    Oh, and it would help if the bloody format weren't called "Ogg Vorbis". It's a name only a nerd could love.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  90. Firewire cards like $20. Good ones $60. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can afford a FireWire device, you can afford to upgrade your computer to deal with it.

  91. Goatse.cx guy, model, dead at 31 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - the famed star model for goatse.cx was found dead in his Christmas Island home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture and message board everywhere. Truly an American icon.

    1. Re:Goatse.cx guy, model, dead at 31 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, he's 30 years old, get it right!

    2. Re:Goatse.cx guy, model, dead at 31 by doooras · · Score: 0

      you must be the same dipshit that posted that about stephen king yesterday.

  92. IPod Killer by halo8 · · Score: 1

    ppl have already posted about the tech specs of the IPod

    The IPod is the IPod because of its design its form functioning simplicity, its looks great and it works, that's all you need that's all it dose that's what makes it so great

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    1. Re: iPod killer by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

      I only have 8.18 gig of mp3's and I haven't looked for new mp3's for a few months.
      The iPod is a standard toshiba 2.5" IDE laptop drive, you can take it out and put in a larger drive if you want.
      Just copy the iPod software to the drive first.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
    2. Re: iPod killer by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wrong. iPod uses a 1.8 inch drive, and nobody else makes them. And none are bigger than 5 gig.

      Oh, I'm sorry, you were trolling and looking for l00sers. Carry on.

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  93. no fire = no killer by gralem · · Score: 1

    I don't like waiting all weekend to download my songs to an MP3 player. With a 20 GB hard drive it will take like 15 hours to transfer an entire HD worth. No iPod killer yet.

    ---gralem

  94. DV editing on FireWire� by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

    iMovie is just a toy for home movies, Final Cut Pro 3 is the bomb for computer editing.

    60 gig external FireWire drive is ok for storing DV, its cheap fast and easy to connect to the edit computer after the shoot.

    Digital Cameras might be able to use USB2 better, but I still prefer those 3" CD Sony Mavica uses.
    I just they would take pictures faster, drop into memory first, then write to disc.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
    1. Re:DV editing on FireWire� by stripes · · Score: 5, Insightful
      iMovie is just a toy for home movies, Final Cut Pro 3 is the bomb for computer editing.

      iMovie is also about $900 cheaper (or is it "only" $600 cheaper?), and people have done more then home movies in it. I do admit that FCP3 is far less limited, and if you need 10 video tracks and more then 3 audio tracks, and cuts/fades/effects not in the 80 or so iMovie has, then it is a much better thing to use. iMovie is a lot more then a toy, it's a great starter tool. FCP3 is a lot better, but frequently not needed.

      Digital Cameras might be able to use USB2 better, but I still prefer those 3" CD Sony Mavica uses. I just they would take pictures faster, drop into memory first, then write to disc.

      You are not likely to ever get the CD writer in the Mavica as fast as the faster flash cards (or maybe even the microdrives). You want to bust on iMovie for being a toy, and then you talk about the Mavica? The D30's the bomb :-) Or really the EOS-1D, I mean don't you need 8 frames per second and huge image buffer? Doesn't everyone need to have a five stop correction range and ISO 3200? :-)

      The 3" CD writere will also always be bigger then CF writers, so you won't see a digital ELPH (PS100/PS110) using one. They are almost as small as the iPod after all...

    2. Re:DV editing on FireWire� by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

      sure iMovies cheaper, it's free.
      You get what you pay for...

      FCP3 is what my dad needs, I just need to get him weaned off the OS 9 stuff he's using.
      I think he's sick and tired of Boris Effects.

      The reason I want to see some scratch memory on the CD mavica is so it has a buffer.
      I like the CD mavica because it's not a toy like the floppy Mavica.
      It has 1600 x 1200 res, about 200 pictures per disc and the features I want.

      I think Sony is going to redesign the CD mavica so that the CD writer is under the camera base, instead of at the back.
      The main point of the CD mavica is storage, 156 MB per disc and it can be read by any CD drive.

      Memory Cards are difficult to transfer, expensive and don't have enough room.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  95. Add a card? get a real computer! by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

    Why PC's are years behind Macs amuses me everytime my neighbour says there are far more programs on a pc, I just hook up a FireWire CD Burner or a USB keyboard.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
    1. Re:Add a card? get a real computer! by aka-ed · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      amuses me everytime my neighbour says there are far more programs...

      I have firewire and USB on my pc, and guess what?
      A) It cost me a great deal less than your Mac.
      B) There are still far more programs available for my PC than for your Mac.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    2. Re:Add a card? get a real computer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Moderator-crackho:
      How is a response to obvious flamebait, flamebait? And why was the actual AC baiter left unmodded?

    3. Re:Add a card? get a real computer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because we're talking about firewire and USB, and their uses, and you're degenerating this into a war over whether PC is better than a mac

    4. Re:Add a card? get a real computer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's pointing out the fact that both pc and mac are equal in that they can use firewire and USB peripherals, and you jump in with the "who's is better arguement"

    5. Re:Add a card? get a real computer! by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

      A) it would cost you less, you live in the USA.
      B) not when I run Virtual PC 5.

      C) I actually have more programs than just Mac and PC, I have my KAOS programs from my operating system.

      These programs are not available on PC because KAOS hasn't been ported to PC yet.
      It's design is currently Dual G4 only.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
    6. Re:Add a card? get a real computer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh. His "amusement" comes from where, then?

      The distinct implication is he was "amused" by his friend's PC choice, and I was not anused by his AC post. There was a fallacy in it (ie, his friend said "apple"; he said "orange"), and I pointed it out.

    7. Re:Add a card? get a real computer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs are fine computers, after ten years using a variety of Apple II models, I owned one from 1994 to 1997 (a well-equipped ci, inherited from a publishing outfit that went bust). I was not unhappy with it then, though I looked lustily through the PC Games section of the local shop, and I doubt I'd be unhappy with one now.

      However, my allegiance changed when, in the same month I had to replace the floppy drive in my own Mac (nearly $200) and in my sister's PC clone (about $20). Take that info for what you will, it was never my intention to start a contest.

  96. consider Archos by markj02 · · Score: 2

    Their latest gadget is really neat: high speed transfers via USB2.0 (I'd prefer FireWire, but...), and it can do MP3 music quality recording and encoding right in the box. They are a bit bigger than the iPod, but so is the Rio probably.

    1. Re:consider Archos by Zarnoff · · Score: 1

      The new Archos Recoder 20 looks nice as well. Anyone have any experience with Archos?

      -z

  97. USB? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    20GB = 160Gb.
    160Gb = 163840Mb.
    163840Mb / 12Mb/sec = 13653 sec
    13553 sec = 3.8 hours, or 3 hours 48 mins. Not too bad. Of course, it would have to be the ONLY thing on the USB bus. Firewire's overrated!

    1. Re:USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not going to get anywhere near 12Mb of real data throughput from USB. 8Mb is more reasonable, which puts it at about 5 hours. Personally, I'll take the 5 minutes for my iPod (20 if it had as big a hard drive.)

  98. Archos Jukebox Multimedia by KommissarHorizon · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'm waiting for one of these... MP3, WMA, Mpeg4 on a tiny 320x240 LCD Just the thing for the morning train commute.

  99. MP3 CD players by duren686 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Personally, in terms of money per storage space, I like my MPTrip clone.. I rarely ever listen to more than 11 hours of music at a time, and this thing works wonderfully. Despite the warning on the page, it actually does read CD-RW's, and when I have to change it, it takes about 9 minutes and I'm done. Best of all, this thing is er.. competitively priced, and it's a very high-quality first-gen mp3/cd player.

    If you're willing to spend a bit more and don't mind not having Duren686's Personal Seal of Approval, you can try the AVC Soul Player. I've never used one, but I've heard nothing but good about it, and as an added bonus, the upgradeable firmware gives it the possibility of reading OGG files.

    --
    Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
  100. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by mbourgon · · Score: 2

    The AC won't be modded up enough, so let me repeat.

    >>20gb would likely take something like *two days*.
    >That's FUD.
    >It took me 11 hours to put all 34 gigs of my music on an external USB drive

    Oh, so only 22 hours. My bad.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  101. Re:Your Wife by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mrs Palmer? and her 5 daughters?

    Fifth grade called, they want their joke back. :)

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  102. Size & Weight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Translate from German

    That approx. 13.3 cm for a long time, 9.5 cm broad and 3.2 cm high as well as approximately 290 gram weighing Rio Riot is delivered according to Sonicblues Onlineshop starting from at the end of of February for approximately 400, - US Dollar. Specification to the availability in Germany was not given yet.

    see http://www.golem.de/0201/17653.html

  103. "It looks to me like an iPod killer" by Lars+T. · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, it looks big and heavy, it can probably destroy an iPod with one blow.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  104. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aside from some incorrect math, this is actually quite redundant.

  105. Missing a great iPod feature by Shrike89 · · Score: 1

    Most people that haven't used an iPod probably don't realize how great the "hot synch" feature of the iPod is- just plug in the firewire cable, iTunes is launched and your music is synched with the computer. If you regularly add songs ir whole albums to your mp3 collections, it's great not to have to hunt through the file system to find new addtions and drag them to your player. You can do it all manually on your iPod if you choose, but having this done automatically is great.

  106. Dj Functions Schmuctions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, lets make an MP3 player with Dj functions. That way people will play illegal copies of songs in clubs with them.

    Geez.

    long live vinyl

  107. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by Deslock · · Score: 1

    I gotta agree... this thing looks cool, but it's no iPod killer. For one thing, the Riot is *huge*. The iPod is almost too big as it is, but at least it fits in a pocket, which makes is far more useful for many situations.

    Plus, the iPod's spinning wheel interface is the best I've ever used in a portable electronics device. With other players, you need to click buttons repeatedly or hold them down (waiting for menu scrolling to accelerate). It can be irritating. With the iPod, it's quick and intuitive. This is the iPod's best characteristic, IMHO. Judging by the control layout of the Riot, navigation will not be as easy.

    We also don't know if the Riot is as responsive as the iPod (which is instant on / instant play).

    Lastly, while bbum was way off when he said it'd take 2 days to xfer 20gb, 5+ hours is not that great. Sure, you can let it run overnight, but the point is that with the iPod, you don't have too.

    If I had to choose between the Riot and iPod, I'd take the iPod. For now, I'll stick with my $100, 192 MB, 3 oz., solid state player.

  108. USB is fast enough? by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

    Let's lay this one to rest. Even refreshing my 32mb Rio takes too damn long.

    --
    Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
  109. Hard Drives in MP3 Players by guttentag · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It seems like all the new portable MP3 players achieve huge capacities by using hard drives for storage, but I'm not sure this is a great thing.
    • Battery life. A hard drive contains moving parts that need to be spun, and that sucks up battery life. Laptops spin down their hard drives often to lengthen battery life. Thse players may do that as well, storing the current song in memory, but "spinning up" the drive to copy it to memory is still going to take a lot more out of the battery than a flash memory card. One AA battery lasts 30 hours in my Rio PMP300.
    • Hard drives fail. I've seen plenty of desktop hard drives fail. I can't imagine the failure rate for drives that bounce around during your morning jog or your morning race to catch the train. My Rio has taken a lot of abuse over the last 3 years, and I've never had a problem.
    If you want to carry 4,000 songs with you, it's great that you can do that, but are there companies still providing new options for people who aren't moonlighting DJs? :oP
  110. Interesting by moyix · · Score: 1

    It looks like the "iPod killer" has mysteriously disappeared from the writeup. Way to rewrite history, micheal!

  111. Oops :| by moyix · · Score: 1

    Turns out I just didn't see it. Sorry!

  112. Obsession with Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is everyone so obsessed with beating Apple
    the iPod is an Mac only appliance. Most people here don't have Mac's and there for can't use it.
    If it's such a problem for you maybe you should just buy a Mac or a least try using one more up to date than OS 7.1

  113. This is not a portable unit by asv108 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is not an ipod killer, its a nomad jukebox killer. I don't think this is designed to be a "pocket player." That being said, I think this device has a lot of potential.

    As far as firewire concerned, its only useful when you put your collection on the player for the first time. After that, most people will update their player with a few tracks at a time for which the speed of USB is surely enough.

  114. That doesn't matter. by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    With 20GB I could fit my entire MP3 collection on their 2 or 3 times. You could just start the transfer it up one night before you went to sleep and then it would be done in the morning. And then chances are you would never need to do a 4 hour transfer again for MONTHS if not years. Every few days you might want to spend 2 or 3 minutes transferring the new songs you downloaded, but most of the stuff on that MP3 Player Hard Drive is going to stay there for a long long time.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  115. Re:patents? redux by discovercomics · · Score: 2

    Isn't SonicBlue the company that has been producing interesting products with their patents on digital video recorders? I do think it's good to support them.

  116. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words: Mac fag.

  117. Moodlogic by elrond1999 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rio now uses Moodlogic to sort mp3s automagicaly into genres and moods ;) I think moodlogic is excelent ;) More users should try it..

    http://forums.moodlogic.net/thread.jsp?forum=7&t hr ead=52

  118. Why target Apple. by J.C.B. · · Score: 2

    It's probably because:

    Way back when the typical slashdotter was still using windows, they made fun of Mac users, to make themselves feel technically superior. Most of this hostility toward Apple is just left over from that time.

    And that there's a lack of understanding that Apple is in the business of selling Apple computers, and not supporting i386 Linux community.

  119. It's USB...it will only kill time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See this page for a comparison chart of various hard drive based MP3 players...and why USB takes 15+ hours to transfer that much data.

    Anyone that things USB can take on Firewire for this purpose has questionable tech skills.

  120. Why the anti-Apple bias? by BeBoxer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't understand why there is such an unreasonable anti-Apple bias around here. First we have the story about the Shuttle where poster feels compelled to compare it to the iMac. "I find these little gems cuter than any iMac I've ever seen!" What kind of crap is that? Do you know what cute means? The shuttle case looks just like any other case, only smaller. It's not cute. It's not cool. It's just a small case that is just as ugly as a regular ATX case. At least the iMac and iMac2 had innovative designs. And they both would qualify as "cute" by most people's definition. The Shuttle is certainly not cute.

    Then we have the "iPod killer" from Rio. Eh? The thing looks like it's the size of a brick, and I'm sure just as fun to carry around. And why is the Rio "priced competatively"? They used all cheaper components than the iPod, yet charge the same price? And that's competative? And the iPod is "overpriced" because it uses higer quality components for the same price? What the hell are you people smoking? The iPod uses a brand new high tech hard drive which lets the whole iPod be the size of just the hard drive in the Rio. The Rio is plastic, versus metal for the iPod (can you say more durable?) And what makes the reviewer think the interface is better than Apple's? Has dschuetz actually used either one? I doubt it.

    Is it going to show up as a generic USB mass storage device? Or am I going to have to use some half-assed experimental driver to get it to work under Linux? I would say the chance of Linux support is low based upon the support they've given their other products. Sonic Blue might use Linux internally in their products, but have they provided Linux drivers for anything? Ever? Certainly not for their MP3 players. As far as I can tell, any MP3 player which doesn't show up as a generic mass storage device (like the iPod does) is nothing but a Window's centric RIAA-pandering product. I don't know why Slashdot editor would think that was cool. The only reason to not have an MP3 player act as a generic mass storage device is to keep the RIAA happy. And unless the company actually provides Linux drivers (which Sonic Blue does not) you are resigning yourself to half-assed buggy support. Bah.

    1. Re:Why the anti-Apple bias? by ihxo · · Score: 0

      I totally feel your pain, but this is slashdot.org. Pretty much like a Maccentral and Macnn.com for Linux users, so I really don't see why it's not right for them to bash every OS (and company that makes them) that's more successful than Linux. And so far the only OS that I see them giving positive reaction is BeOS (hint hint).

      btw: does the design (not interface) of that RIO Thingy looks just like a Newton ....

    2. Re:Why the anti-Apple bias? by LS · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Geniuses:

      Never consider Slashdot editors unbiased, ESPECIALLY when it comes to stories about products. I'm 100% positive this story was paid for by SonicBlue. Where do you think Slashdot gets their revenue? Ad Clickthrus????

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  121. Still USB. Boy, PC people sure live in the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Four times bigger than the iPod.

    Million times slower.

    Wow, this is sure an iPod "killer."

  122. Better Business Bureau by J.C.B. · · Score: 2

    That sounds a questionable way of doing business, I'd report them to the Better Business Bureau if I were you.

    1. Re:Better Business Bureau by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      I would, but after 7 weeks of trying to get them to honor the warranty, I got tired of not having it, so I went to Circuit City, bought the same model, and returned the broken one the next day--despite having a couple of scratches on it, it still looked like new. I felt bad about it, but I rationalize it by telling myself that Circuit City is better equipped to return faulty merchandise than I am, and if they get pissed at SonicBlue, SonicBlue feels it. The BBB's complaint resolution is no longer something I need to go through, although if I hadn't thought of this, I probably would have.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
  123. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

    I doubt that tiny Toshiba drive in the iPod can write 50MB/s.

  124. Re:20Gb mp3 player? VERY old news. by hirschma · · Score: 1

    Over two years old. I had mine in November 1999. No SDMI, lots of 3rd party software, and it works great.

    Problem tho? VERY expensive compared to what's coming out now.

    I'll keep mine a while :)

  125. Then go get an IEEE-1394 interface card! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sheesh.

    Has anyone bothered to actually go to a computer store and check out the pricing for PCI-slot IEEE-1394 interface cards? They're relatively inexpensive, and best of all drivers are available on the PC platform for Linux and Windows 9X variants (Windows XP supports it natively).

    You want to have an IEEE-1394 interface for your computer anyway if you're doing any video editing work with video downloaded from a MiniDV format camcorder; a lot of professional-quality digital still cameras now sport IEEE-1394 interfaces also.

    Anyway, most of the Compaq and HP computers you see sold at Best Buy, CompUSA, OfficeMax, Staples, and so on already sport an IEEE-1394 connector, so a portable MP3 player with a small hard drive that exclusively uses the IEEE-1394 interface is not as handicapped in the marketplace as many people think.

  126. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by bbum · · Score: 1

    Yeah-- my math was off... but not by a huge amount. Neither USB or FireWire ever runs at the maximum transfer rate. Transfer rates to USB drives are fairly slow and I have heard [and occasionally experienced] numerous reports of extra hugely long transfer times.

    So it is a day -- at best -- it is still a pain in the ass long amount of time.

    I haven't been taking drags off the Jobs crack pipe. I recognize good design when I see it, touch it, use it and the iPod is that. The Riot is the fairly typical curvy-for-the-sake-of-curvy bloated hunk o' yucky plastic that'll be a pain in the ass to carry around. Yippee.

  127. (Physical) Size matters by Gumber · · Score: 2

    People get so hung up on tech specs that they ignore the most important for a portable device:
    Size & Weight.

    The SONICblue device looks like it is about 3times the size and weight of the appple product. Hardly something you can carry with you in your shirt pocket.

  128. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by bbum · · Score: 1

    It can't; it 'feels' like about half that... about 200 mbit/sec or so.

    Still a buttload faster than USB and fast enough to make it convenient to swap all content.

  129. AIFF/WAV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPod can play uncompressed AIFF and WAV files, and you can load 8-10 CD's worth of uncompressed music onto an iPod.

  130. not pointless at all by markj02 · · Score: 2
    If you don't have a computer arbitrating USB traffic, the USB devices are useless.

    How long do you think it will take until someone comes out with a $30 fat cable that does the "arbitration"? It won't work as well as a system designed for it, but that hasn't kept lots of other poor technology from catching on.

  131. Re:But where is Vorbis support? was Re:Anger at Ap by markj02 · · Score: 2
    Well, are you paying the MP3 licensing fees or using a commercial encoder? If not then you, like millions of other users, are infringing the MP3 patents and saying "to hell with it".

    Furthermore, transcoding MP3 into Vorbis is not hard. You could probably do it with a simple Perl script running in the background and not even notice it.

  132. Re:Your Wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please kill yourself.

  133. Re:patents? redux by markj02 · · Score: 2
    Come on--PVR and the surrounding ideas (automatic download of programming information, automatic selection of programs according to keywords or preferences, etc.) are pretty obvious. The price for components drops to the point that companies can build a PVR for the home market and one company tries to corner the market by applying for some obvious patents. That is not nice.

    There are plenty of alternatives. Get yourself a PC with PVR software, preferably free and open source. You'll get something that's more flexible and useful than a PVR to boot.

  134. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by jault · · Score: 1

    I had a Nomad Jukebox before buying my iPod, and I never got close to 1 megabyte per second over its USB connection. More like 300 kbytes per second, which turns your 5 hours into 15.

    At any rate, this certainly isn't an iPod killer for me. If I was offered one of these devices in a even trade, I'd keep my iPod.

  135. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by kson34 · · Score: 1

    Math Correction...

    Hmmm 12 bits in a byte? No, so actually we have 1.5 megabytes per second maximum transfer rate...

    20 Gigabyte is acutally 20480 MB. Which gives us about 3.8 hours transfer at maximum rate.

    Not that it really matters, you never get the whole thing transfered in under 5 or 6 hours anyway, but then again you would probably only do this once, and then add and remove music every now and then. The real problem with this thing is the size, not the USB port...

  136. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If i could work for 5 hours and make 2 days' worth of money, I'd be set for life.

  137. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, 20 gigs in "drive manufacturer" speak is really just 20 billion bytes, which isn't really 20 gigabytes, but it's what actually fits on the drive.

    1 megabyte was used for purposes of generousity.

  138. Using the iPod on a PC by seefried · · Score: 1

    Could someone tell me the feasability of getting an ipod and using it with a PC. I know there is a new software package out called XPlay that should allow this.

    Does anyone have experience with this package?

    Sean

  139. Re:But where is Vorbis support? was Re:Anger at Ap by emptybody · · Score: 1

    unfortunately, to do this you need to pay the license fee so that you can decode the mp3.

    But, no one here cares.
    Bastards.

    --
    comment directly in my journal
  140. Not an iPod killer ... yet by jlower · · Score: 1

    Firewire is nice but not the iPod's main selling point (for me).

    What is, is that it fits in my shirt pocket, holds *enough* music to keep me interested, and has a battery that lasts all day and then some at work.

    This Riot gizmo - notice how they don't tell you how much it weighs or place anything in the photo to give you a sense of scale?

    Even though it would be nice to have more storage, I think I'll keep my iPod for now.

  141. SMDI and everything else people seem to forget by abe1x · · Score: 2, Insightful

    first off as many have said, iPod killer my ass, its not even innovative, there have been 20GB players on the market for over a year now. Big issue #1 though is whether this thing has SMDI or not, if I can't seemlessly move my MP3s around its worthless. No mention of how big it is, nor how much it weighs. From the looks of it its vastly inferior to the Archos line of players, and the iPod is even smaller or lighter.

    As for this whole firewire vs usb, the issue is not the speed, its the fact that you can use firewire to power up the player. That's what makes me want an iPod over my Archos. However 20GB is way better then 5GB, as it stands I can only fit 20% of my cd collection on a 20GB drive, I want the whole collection on my player. Back to the powering up though, take anything but the iPod on the road and you either are spending a fortune on batteries or you are carrying some bulky ass charger with you. Not to mention the fact that the iPod has a better battery then just about anything out there...

  142. Mmm, yeah. $9 expensive.. by ivan256 · · Score: 2

    See subject. The local computer store near me has a 4 port firewire PCI card for $9

  143. Re:But where is Vorbis support? was Re:Anger at Ap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me know when there's a Vorbis decoder for AIX, IRIX, Solaris, or any non-x86 platform, oh wait, there isn't.

  144. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by Phork · · Score: 2

    no, not 12 bits in a byte. But the fastest usb ever really get sin real world situations is 1 megabbyte per second, and frequently it doesnt get that much.

    --
    -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
  145. 20gb too small, usb does suck ,maybe 400gb+ better by the_march_hare · · Score: 1

    I have a pjb with a 40gb Hd
    yes the usb connection does suck. but I only really find that I have to load my music once.. everything after the initial load, is really small loads but mostly editing/sorting the contents...
    also I think that 40gb is to small I would like an ecessive(sp?) mp3 player. how about the osiris backpack with the speakers. + 4 WD12000BB(120gb) in firewire external cases. + a sony picture book to control everything + a huge battery.. sure this setup isn't practical or small .. it is large and heavy and maybe not every feasible(sp?) but I think it is cool.. you can run around the city with your ghettoblaster onyour back and when people ask what music you have you can say silly things like.. oh 20th century jazz all of ludwig van + a large selection of 90's hiphop and drum n' bass ^_^ plz don't flame me I am scared enough posting on /.
    oh I know I should have provided links to everything but I am lazy

  146. mp3pro by malkman · · Score: 1

    It's about time they started supporting this.
    I converted some 128kbps to 96/mp3pro, and they sounded identical. Even if it isn't any better sounding, you could convert all of your exisiting mp3s and save some space.

    --

    Robort knows all.
  147. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by DemiKnute · · Score: 1

    Errr, I don't have the initiative to check and see if the device supports it, but USB 2.0 is 480 megabits per second. That's forty times faster than 12 megabits per second, which would let you fill the HD in 1/40 of 5 hours, or about 7 anda half minutes. And that's using your faulty math.

    --
    .
  148. Still USB by gremlin_591002 · · Score: 1

    Give this thing a firewire interface and a better FM radio than I've got on my Rio Volt. And I'll buy it. USB is just to slow for this much music.

  149. win/mac compatibility costs almost nothing by extra88 · · Score: 1

    If you want to make a device work on Windows and Mac, just format the drive FAT32. Macs can read FAT16 & FAT32 drives, have for years. The Mac OS, since v8.5 I think (1998), has built in generic drivers for mounting USB and FireWire drives so as long as the manufacturer sticks to some common steps, there's no driver to write.

    The only cost for two platforms is you have to write software which interfaces with MP3 software on both. But playlist formats are standard cross-platform and while iTunes is cool, the could opt to work with a cross-platform program like MusicMatch.

    1. Re:win/mac compatibility costs almost nothing by VRisaMetaphor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the software costs were what I had in mind, and I have to admit also that I was specifically thinking about software at least as functional as iTunes (with auto-sync and all that) for both platforms. I guess it could be pretty inexpensive if your definition of "supports" is "can be made to work with" :^)

  150. Who has one that does not like it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The posts above are from people who have an iPod and like it and people who do not have an iPod and do not like iPods. Is there anyone who has an iPod or has used one and does not like it?

    I do not like Alaska.

  151. iPod Carrying Case (was:Huh?) by shking · · Score: 1

    OWC sells a leather carrying case for the iPod for $29.

    Details are at http://eshop.macsales.com/Search/Search.cfm?Column =Description&Criteria=ipod

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
  152. It's too big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's hard to tell from the photo, but I have it on good authority that the unit is approximately 2 feet by 6 feet. The display is very visible at that size, but it will be difficult to take it in the car or to the gym.

  153. i pod killer hahahaha by linuxbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not, let me count the ways;

    1. iPod is the size of a deck of cards, the Riot is bigger

    2. iPod uses firewire, Riot uses usb. can you say slow

    3.The iPod also acts as a portable hard drive

    4. It doesnt auto synch with anything

    5. Doesnt work with iTunes.

    iPod killer, no f$#@ing way, its the same as every other mp3 player only with more storage space. Sorry Rio, please try again

  154. Re: Yes, let's get our math straight. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2
    Your assumptions are wrong. With the USB framing and formatting overhead, the best you can get out of USB->IDE "mass storage" adapters (which is what the device probably is) is about 600-700kB/s. 20GB (on a hard drive) is 20,000,000,000 bytes. Assume we actually get 700kB/s, which is unlikely, but let's assume that anyway. I get 27901 seconds, or 465 minutes or about 7 hours and 45 minutes.


    Cryptnotic

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  155. Kind of Like by spacefrog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Saying this device is an iPod killer reminds me of the people driving souped-up Camero's who rattle on and on about how they "toasted that Porsche at the stop light" and feel that is an accomplishment. Dragstrip performance is important, well, at the track. You can't compare that to a well-rounded package and expect me not to laugh.

    In this analogy, the iPod is a shiny, brand new 911. A wonderfully and carefully engineered piece of precision machinery. An art form.

    The Rio product is heavy, clunky, and ugly. It really only beats the iPod in one area: capacity. So what? Would you rather fill an iPod with six gigs of music in five minutes, or fill the Rio with 20 gigs in five hours? Hmmmm.

    The two products being compared cost the same . . . .

    And to those who complain about the fact that not every PC has firewire: Anybody with a screwdriver and a spare 10 minutes can add firewire for about $30. Get over it.

    1. Re:Kind of Like by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
      Anybody with a screwdriver and a spare 10 minutes can add firewire...

      ... and a spare PCI slot.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  156. Good Product by Wheaty18 · · Score: 1

    I still have my Rio500 that I recieved for XMas 3 years ago, and it still works perfectly. If you're in the market for a Portable MP3 player, don't think twice about buying a Rio. Very well made.

  157. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by seney · · Score: 1

    let's go over why the iPod kicks all the competition's ass.

    * fast as hell
    * small as hell
    * super easy to use
    * super easy to use as an external drive to transfer files

    let's go over why the competition sucks.
    * the opposite of above
    and...

    * you need a fanny pack to carry them around.

    hope this helps!

  158. Archos Recorder 20 is worth the wait by Zarnoff · · Score: 3, Informative

    Archos has a 20GB mp3 player/recorder (analog and digital hardware mp3 encoding on the fly), it's only slightly larger than the iPod and uses USB2.0 (about 12MB/sec, not firewire but a vast improvement over USB1.0).

    It's $369 and available Feb. 1

    http://www.archos.com/us/products/product_500277.h tml
    http://www.archos.com/order_desk_na.html

    -z

  159. Archos Jukebox Recorder 20 by Namarrgon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is more like it.

    Pros:
    - 20 GB drive
    - USB2 (i.e. Firewire speeds, but still backwards compatible with ubiquitous USB1 when you need it)
    - Records :-)
    - 10 hour life
    - Usable as portable harddrive; you can put non-MP3 files on there and get them off again (unlike iPod)
    - Cheaper: US$369

    Cons:
    - 350g

    Summary:
    It ain't as small & sexy as an iPod, but it's undoubtably more useful. ALL your music on tap (OK, a lot of it at least), a portable drive that plugs anywhere and is usably fast, and it records too :-)

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  160. My intent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is to trade all my music to my friends, in exchange for all their musice. And I only want to take a couple of minutes doing this. And I want to be able to do this by just hooking up their mp3 player to my mp3 player and pressing the "sync both ways" button.

  161. Re:iPod killer? Hardly. by Bj�rn+Stenberg · · Score: 1
    (Sure, USB 2.0 can do it-- but who has USB 2.0 support on their MP3 player?)
    The Archos Jukebox Recorder 20 has USB 2.0.
  162. Recharge via USB? by Ryano · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nobody has mentioned the fact that the iPod recharges its battery via FireWire when you plug it into your computer. Is this even possible with USB? I know that USB delivers power, but is it sufficient to recharge this device's 10-hour battery within a reasonable time?

    The iPod does come with a power adaptor, but you only need to worry about it if you're travelling, and don't have access to a FireWire-equipped PC.

    1. Re:Recharge via USB? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does anyone else think it's ludicrous to have to leave ones computer turned on just to charge the battery of a portable device? Sure, a lot of people leave their systems on all the time, but I find it quite presumptuous of the folks in Cupertino to assume we ALL do. I think they were either corner-cutting to avoid the cost of including a $2 power lump, or just thought they were so dang smart that they failed to see the obvious drawback of charge-via-firewire.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Recharge via USB? by Ryano · · Score: 2

      "Is it just me, or does anyone else think it's ludicrous to have to leave ones computer turned on just to charge the battery of a portable device?"

      Very many Mac users keep their computers turned on all the time, as fanless iMacs and iBooks run silently in sleep mode. In fact, the "power" button on my iMac drops it into sleep mode by default, rather than shutting it down. So if the machine is going to be on anyway, why not use it to recharge an external device? It saves socket space, at least.

      "I think they were either corner-cutting to avoid the cost of including a $2 power lump, or just thought they were so dang smart that they failed to see the obvious drawback of charge-via-firewire."

      A power adaptor is included, so you can't accuse them of cutting corners. So if you don't like leaving your computer on, you can simply plug your iPod into the wall.

  163. Sonic Blue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 90 day warranty is shameful. The Sonicblue tech support really is non-existant. The price is way too high. The device is too easy to drop...ooops! There went my investment. The whole world of portable music players is just so much crapola. Did I mention they are easy to STEAL? Oooops, there went my investment. Anyone buy a Rio 800? They suck in every way. I say Fuck Sonicblue, er Creative, er whatever.

  164. hard drive players are crippled by battery life by Luke_A_P · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Both the iPod and Rio Riot use Li-Ion batteries and have a life of about 10hours. As I see it this gives them very little advantage over MP3 CD players. A CD will hold more than ten hours of MP3's. A good MP3 CD-Player will run for 15hours on a pair of AA's, and you can easily carry more with you. I travel around a lot and that feature is very important to me. Until they produce one that runs on fuel cells (which can't be that far off) I don't see myself wanting a hard drive based music player. A CD based player may be larger but its lighter, less fragile and a hell of a lot cheaper. With the money you save you could even buy a solid state player to take running. The hard drive players may work while you're running but I bet it makes them fail a lot sooner than they would otherwise. One thing I have to say in Rio's favour is that their firmware support for the Rio Volt has been superb. I would not be surprised to see ogg and/or mp3pro support there soon.

  165. Ipod or Riot ??? NONE !!! I'll go for ARCHOS by titirezad · · Score: 1

    The KILLER one IS the ARCHOS MULTIMEDIA JUKEBOX !

    Check for yourself: http://www.archos.com/uk/products/product_550011.h tml

  166. iPod Killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think the two important points are 1) form factor and 2) firewire. They neglect to mentioned form factor (so we assume it would be larger) and 2) it doesn't have firewire so misses out on some of the benefits of the iPod (recharging/faster transfers).

    However, there are some good things here that Apple could use with iPod.

    I'm sure there will be an updated iPod in the future (hopefully with Line Out/Microphone/FM Tuner/10 Gb+ Hdd) which will deal with this product (and hopefully a price reduction in the current model).

    I like Sonic Blue's other products though (I think they are making more of an impact on the "digital lifestyle" than Apple). I hope Apple teams up with another company (like Pioneer) and extends their range to Home Entertainment devices (ala Tivo/Sonic Blue) and Car Stereos. The iPod would also then become a "transport" device for transfering songs between these devices and your PC; And Apple is better poised than Sonic Blue in the overall "Integration" of such devices. However, Apple best not snooze in releasing these things to the market!

  167. Don't forget about... by mblase · · Score: 2

    The Treo 10, which has already gone here.

  168. Anybody tested the new navigation system? by krazyninja · · Score: 1
    Has anybody tested out the supposedly new navigation system? Is it any better than the other portable systems out there?

    --
    "Do something man. Right now."
  169. Re:But where is Vorbis support? was Re:Anger at Ap by krazyninja · · Score: 1
    They are not violating the patents. All the inventors say is that, if X company is selling the products for a price, they need a percentage. If Y company is giving it away for free, or if the volumes are less than a specified amount, then they are not violating any law, as long as they do not make money out of it.
    Anyway, apart from commercial encoders, there are few options for good quality encoding, other than LAME.

    And as far transcoding MP3 to vorbis, in general, it is not advisable to transcode at all, and a lot has been said about this in the vorbis dev forum.

    --
    "Do something man. Right now."
  170. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by tastegood · · Score: 1

    Has anyone considered that for some users, 5 gigs is too restrictive for a lot of the folks who like these kinds of devices?

    I've currently got a 6 gig Nomad Jukebox - why would I downgrade my size when I'm constantly struggling to juggle which 110-odd albums to keep on my drive??

    With my Jukebox, I switch maybe twenty albums a month. When it comes time to do a big switch, I have to sit down for a few hours, make sure my ID3 tags are in order, and then I send everything in a batch and go do something else for 10 minutes. Not exactly a huge deal.

    I'd love FireWire type speed too, but the storage space and durability are far more important purchasing factors. Not to mention organizational capacity, something the reviewers always seem to gloss over. I'm really tired of using Dr. Tag at this point.

  171. Doesn't Support Linux... fuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must pay more just because I must buy WINBLOWS? HELL NO !!!!

    Fuck it, it's useless for me.

  172. D-Link DMP-HD610 looks good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just found this from D-Link. It's a 10 Gb MP3 player, USB, 8 Hr battery life. It cost $225 and doubles as a USB hard disk. Sweet! That would be more my price point for a mobile device.

    The link to D-Link is here.

    http://www.dlink.com/products/multimedia/dmphd61 0/

  173. USB2? by hearingaid · · Score: 2

    More people have FireWire than USB2, right now.

    Given that state of things, why would people switch? FireWire is technologically superior to USB2, faster, and has far more products available for it.

    In the PC world, you need a recent micro to make either reasonably useful, so there's no legacy advantage to USB2 either. It's not like you can use USB2 devices on USB1. Sure, you can upgrade to a USB2 controller and keep all your USB1 devices, but you can do that if you plug in a FireWire card too.

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

    1. Re:USB2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he just say "micro"? God, I haven't heard anyone use the word "micro" to mean "computer" since about 1988!

    2. Re:USB2? by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      You haven't been reading my posts. :)

      I use the word micro to distinguish the computers I actually own from the ones I miss dearly. ;)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  174. Obligitory Ogg post by drew_kime · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but does it play Vorbis files?

    --
    Nope, no sig
  175. I"ll still stand by my Rio Volt SP250. by shadowlight1 · · Score: 1

    With all this hype over gigabyte-drive driven players, I'm happy with my Rio Volt SP250.
    9 minutes to burn a CD of 650 meg worth of music (which is plenty for a week or so of driving); plus I have an instant backup of my mp3s.
    And with CD-Rs going for as cheap as 5-6 cents a CD, I can have 20 gig worth in no time.
    Plus the SP250 has the radio tuner, the rechargable batteries, and can be plugged into any stereo system.
    On my budget, I'm really not worried about the gigabyte or stick driven mp3 players -- a few extra minutes versus $100 - $700 more spending is not really worth my time -- and not when I can expand my collection indefinitely via CD for much cheaper.

  176. Re:Huh? [shameless plug] by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    Sheesh, if you want it to be unbreakable you might as well ask for infinite storage capacity and a power source that lasts forever. Then it should also be pocket-sized and have a 27" screen.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  177. Re:Two DAYS? what crack are you smoking? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    Yeah-- my math was off... but not by a huge amount

    Yeah, 5 hours, 48 hours; you were only an order of magnitude off. Doofus.

    So it is a day -- at best --

    No, as previous posters have illustrated, it's probably about 6 hours at best. Hyperbole is ill-suited to technical discussions and only serves to make you look the fool.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  178. I never troll� by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

    sorry, someone gave the wrong info on the size, but the principle stands.

    wait until the warrenty runs out, then get a bigger HD.

    As for losers, you just go look in the mirror...
    You are a big fat american who looks as stupid as you write.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  179. 5th grade called, by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

    The teacher wants you to get off SlashDot and come back to class...

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  180. Re: please kill yourself by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

    With an ugly face like his, he'd be doing the world a favor...

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  181. Riot Dimensions Here! It's Mega-Huge! by MeowMeowMan · · Score: 1

    Like you, I've been hunting for the elusive dimensions of the Rio Riot. Finally got it:
    http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/15760.html

    "5.5-inch-long, 3.75-inch-wide, 1.25-inch-thick player..." -- that's larger (but very slightly thinner) than the Archos-bricko-player, Jukebox 6000. The article does not state it's weight, but I reckon it to be at least x1.5 that of the iPod.

    Ugh, let's wait for something smaller ...