Slashdot Mirror


Cat Recognition Algorithms?

skunkeh writes "So your cat keeps bringing dead (or half dead) animals in to your house. What do you do? Obviously, you set up a digital camera to monitor the cat door and lock her out if she has something in her mouth..."

424 comments

  1. This is quite spiffy. by dotderf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Great application of technology! If it can recognize cats, I bet it can recognize terrorists (*groan*) But practically speaking, why not just get up and let the cat in?

    1. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > But practically speaking, why not just get up and let the cat in?

      The whole point is to *not* let the cat in if the cat's brought home a little ..present.. for you.

    2. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the issue is that cats often want to get into the house at times when the occupants are asleep or unavailable, and finding a dead animal lying in your living room in the morning is no fun. This is a fairly simple application of the technology, but one that thousands of cat owners can certainly appreciate.

    3. Re:This is quite spiffy. by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

      Well, it is a pain to let the cat in, cause like a 2 year old they want to go right back out again, so a kitty door is the best choice (also lets em crap outside with is better then cleaning a box).

      On the application note, yes this is cool tech, it could be coupled with a security badge system and make installtions secure, since someone couldn't just take a badge and pretend to be someone else, could also speed up airports.

    4. Re:This is quite spiffy. by ore · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I concur, it's absolutely a great idea for pet owners who might have to deal with occasionaly stinky offering from their loving pets. I particularly enjoyed the the details the author went into concerning the image analysis itself.

      Several strikes against this story though.

      First, if you'll note from one of the snapshots, the machine it's running on is on Winders. Doh! And second (and I've been resisting doing this for several weeks now), although not about the story itself, Slashdot has got stop recycling content from Daypop. It starting to show through guys. At least, if you're going to re-post what is old news to quite a few of us, make a serious effort of getting the attributions (i.e. give Daypop credit for making you aware of it) correct. And perhaps, try to add something new.

    5. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not letting the cat in until it brings me a pot of gold and rumplestiltskin. It has an equal chance of learning it's lesson to not bring mice and cicadas inside.

    6. Re:This is quite spiffy. by 56ker · · Score: 1

      The cat flap lets the cat in already (because of its collar) - what the story is about is not letting it in when its got a dead animal in its mouth.

    7. Re:This is quite spiffy. by 56ker · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes - but this cat flap already lets the cat in automatically! What the owner has done is modify it to only let the cat in when its not carrying a dead animal in its mouth.

    8. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it can recognize cats, I bet it can recognize terrorists (*groan*)

      that is, if the terrorist has a rat in it's mouth.

      --
      sig - .
    9. Re:This is quite spiffy. by darkonc · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I have a cat door. It allows my cats to go in and out of the house at will. One cat even learned to use a second floor cat door by jumping across from the neighbour's roof.

      I'm not up to the idea of waking up at 4AM to let my cat out for 35 minuts before he decides it's too wet out and he want's back in. Better to let him implement his indoor/outdoor policy.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    10. Re:This is quite spiffy. by interiot · · Score: 2

      The cat gets to go in and out 10 times a day... eg. the cat gets to be comfortable and happy even when the humans have to leave for a while.

    11. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Peyna · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      /. editors don't have to give Daypop credit for the story, since skunkeh is the one who submitted the story, for all we know, he found it on his own.

      Asking them to give credit to Daypop for this would be like asking a local TV station to give credit to another for a story on a car accident. Obviously it's something that exists independently of either TV station, or in this case, news reporting website.

      --
      What?
    12. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the dead animal doesn't have a magnetic tag, or a collar, so what's the big deal? The door isn't gonna let it in.

    13. Re:This is quite spiffy. by ore · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You could absolutely be right in this case. Point taken. But there has been an alarming rise in frequency of content from the Daypop Top40 being posted on /. 3-10 days after it hits. It's just a little lame.

    14. Re:This is quite spiffy. by RickHunter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Airport Security: "Excuse me sir, can you step infront of this camera? Yes, thanks. Now, please hold this in your mouth...."

      And you thought boarding a flight was a pain now!

    15. Re:This is quite spiffy. by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dotderf I bet it cant recognize a terrorist, you racist asshole, not all terrorists are from the middle east with turbins on their heads.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    16. Re:This is quite spiffy. by gmack · · Score: 1

      Actually it is possible to train cats not to do that. Just close the door after a set amount of time. And ignore any requests to open the door for about half an hour. If they sit in the doorway just close it gently but hard enough to make the cat uncomfortable (but not hard enough to bruise it).

      They learn.

      Works on dogs too but it generally takes longer to train the less intellegent breeds.

    17. Re:This is quite spiffy. by w3woody · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      LOL! And me without any moderating points today...

    18. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Actually it is possible to train cats not to do that. Just close the door after a set amount of time. And ignore any requests to open the door for about half an hour. If they sit in the doorway just close it gently but hard enough to make the cat uncomfortable (but not hard enough to bruise it)."

      Oh just bash your cat up why don't you ? Cruel man.

    19. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was being sarcastic.

    20. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then those that weren't were already inside, yes?

    21. Re:This is quite spiffy. by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      Why not honor the cat for who (s)he is. The trophy is brought home out of love and respect for you. Yes, they're icky...Instead of getting angry at my cat, I smile and think "Oh, isn't that sweet?". You might want to give that a try, probably will take you a lot less time than hacking together your proposed lockout device.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    22. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's quite a leap you are making there. Note the cat is not recognized as Flo - most other shadows that look like her would be allowed by this fairly simple scheme.

    23. Re:This is quite spiffy. by issachar · · Score: 1
      Note the cat is not recognized as Flo

      Actually, you're wrong. From the webpage: New: our image recognition algorithm can now determine which of the two cats is entering.

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    24. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

      Aren't terrorists rats already?

    25. Re:This is quite spiffy. by JDizzy · · Score: 2

      So how should they program in the recognition of "a pot of gold and rumplestiltskins" in the cats mouth?? Thats a good idea though, to maybe use this to teach the cats what you, the master, wants the cat to bring you.

      --
      It isn't a lie if you belive it.
    26. Re:This is quite spiffy. by mazachan · · Score: 1

      According to the site, it is to prevent the cat from bringing in half dead animals into the house so the owner doesn't have to spend time chasing it all over the place.

    27. Re:This is quite spiffy. by servanya · · Score: 1

      or better yet, a device that recognizes when the wife is having "that time of the month" and locks her out. Algorithm: hormonal imbalance sensed, door gets locked :)

    28. Re:This is quite spiffy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why not honor the cat for who (s)he is. The trophy is brought home out of love and respect for you. Yes, they're icky...Instead of getting angry at my cat, I smile and think "Oh, isn't that sweet?". You might want to give that a try, probably will take you a lot less time than hacking together your proposed lockout device.

      Those trophies are brought home because the cat thinks you're such a poor hunter (s)he has to do the job for you, as if you were a kitten. Yes, there's some affection there, too, but it's not without a small slap o' cat diss as well.

    29. Re:This is quite spiffy. by TheMeld · · Score: 1

      It's a *CAT*. If it forgot to come in before I went to bed, it can sleep on the porch. If it's got a rodent, it can sit and eat it on the porch no matter what time of day it is, because I can look outside and see if it's got one before I let it in.

      And yes, cats are quite capable of learning to ask to be let in before you go to bed. In the course of my life, my family has had 3 cats, and even the dumbest male[1] of them could figure this out.

      If stuff is coming in your pet door that you don't want, the solution is to not use the pet door.

      [1]: Of course, he was the most fun to be around too :)

      --
      -Cheetah
  2. damn it!! by thefunkychicken · · Score: 1

    god damn!! that would have been a good neural net to do for bishes project!! ohh well, already passed the module without the novel app!!...

    1. Re:damn it!! by brain159 · · Score: 1
      hehe - I'm a RDG compsci myself and I'm glad that McKee didn't ask us to do this for last term's Rep+Reasoning (symbolic-level AI stuff, mostly for pure comp-sci peeps like me) assignment. Bloody TORUS remote control digger (with shoddy ball-recog) was bad enough.

      I had bish for 1/cy/a6 in part one, he 0wns (esp. in comparison to Warwick!).

      [me = siu00mrf]

    2. Re:damn it!! by thefunkychicken · · Score: 1

      heh, pure cyb here (siu00maj) - indeed bish is a better lecturer than warwick - looked at the digger project, looked cool, but a pain in the ass - glad i didnt have to do it, though warwick did actually lecture us (as in people not doing the digger project) on robotic vision systems and what not, thresholding, finding edges and all the stuff that would have let us actually do the digger..... our departments seem to be messed up like that!! :)

    3. Re:damn it!! by thefunkychicken · · Score: 1

      i know who you are!! - i went to your home page - the flarp bar!! i was in the CS lab on friday, wanted to print out some notes, everyone was there printing off reports, some were waiting for bish to demo their neural nets assignments, a guy sat next to me was printing something, he loaded something then walked off to talk to someone, there was a registry dialog box on screen and the directory that it was run from had flarpbar written in it, im sure! heh, i was sat next to you not 2 days ago :P

    4. Re:damn it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey don't I know you too?

      Remember in the gay bar the other night? The guy in the bathroom? I knew I remembered you from somewhere!

    5. Re:damn it!! by brain159 · · Score: 1
      yup, got it in one, that was me - kinda freaky to notice how many Reading peeps I see around /. :o)

      And just so you don't feel too bad, most of us did the vision stuff for TORUS digger really badly, just applying a threshold to the image to make it black+white and then just assuming that the only white blob is the ball (after applying some erosion to clean up the image).

    6. Re:damn it!! by thefunkychicken · · Score: 1

      heh, why would i feel bad?? i didnt have to do it :)

    7. Re:damn it!! by thefunkychicken · · Score: 1

      no dude, i dont hang in the AC bar - you sure that wernt your dad you were talking to??

  3. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If only it worked on in-laws.

    1. Re:Cool by slickwillie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not? Just tell your in-laws that they must enter through the cat door. And since you are tired of feeding them all the time, they must bring their own food. Suggest that, since they will have trouble getting through the door with something in their hands, they should put it in their mouth when using the cat door.

      CatDoor Version 2.0: Guillotine option.

  4. The words by 56ker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    haven't they got something better to do with their time? spring to mind.

    1. Re:The words by pgrote · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're kidding, right?

      This isn't just some cobbled hack. This is really solid use of image recognition in daily life.

    2. Re:The words by 56ker · · Score: 1

      Yes but I'm sure you don't need *that* much hardware to do it! Have you looked at the bottom photo yet?

    3. Re:The words by Exedore · · Score: 2

      You're right, they don't need a big, honkin' general purpose PC, digital camera, and other stuff. Such a thing could be built with hardware specifically built for the purpose of simple digital image recognition, pet-door locking mechanism interface, etc, etc. They should have just gone down to Radio Shack and asked for a $19.99 Cat-Victim-Image-Capture/Recognition-Pet-Door-Inte rfacer-Detect-O-Matic and been done with it.

      What? Such a device doesn't exist?

      Damn, guess they'll have to make do with a PC, digital camera, and image processing software, then.

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

  5. wouldn't it be nice by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 4, Funny

    wouldn't it be nice to have that much free time? =P

    --
    sig - .
    1. Re:wouldn't it be nice by 56ker · · Score: 1

      or even just to have a cat in the first place? :o/

    2. Re:wouldn't it be nice by alexmeaden · · Score: 1

      Umm, I think you'll find that this is being done as an R&D project by an image analysis/recognition company, not just as a hobby.

    3. Re:wouldn't it be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldn't it be nice to have that much free time?

      must be a slashdot "editor"...

    4. Re:wouldn't it be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop talking like you could do it if you had free time.

  6. We finally catch up... by cethiesus · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's about time we started monitoring those cats. They've been doing it to us for too long....

    --


    "Ford," he said, "you're turning into a penguin. Stop it."
  7. This may also train the cat to... by RyanFenton · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Drop the undesirable object.

    2. Trigger the door.

    3. Pick up undesirable object and walk through door.

    So don't count the cat out yet (when it has the unwanted object)!

    :^)

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:This may also train the cat to... by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      the cat has to go through a tunnel in theory they could put preasure sensitive plates in the tunnel and make sure all items on the preasure plates match the shape of the kittys paw prints.

    2. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think cats can be trained, then you haven't known many cats!

    3. Re:This may also train the cat to... by LiENUS · · Score: 2, Informative

      the reason cats dont train too well is they really are very intelligent so they have a tendincy to ignore you if they dont want to do something. cats can even be toilet trained, you need to give them more credit.

    4. Re:This may also train the cat to... by teslatug · · Score: 2, Funny

      also don't count out the skunk...it may someday force the cat to go first or worse cut off...ok that's too gruesome

    5. Re:This may also train the cat to... by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, my family owns a small pet store. Cats CAN be trained in a sense. Much like squirrels, they learn how to get resources in the most direct manner possible through trial and error. They don't want a "treat" or to please their owner, they want to master their environment for themselves. So, when presented with a annoying door lock, instead of giving up their prey, they can recognize the signs that the door is unlocked (by sound), and also recognize what causes this response (nothing in mouth). It's not training in terms of what the owner wants, but it is training nonetheless.

      :^)

      Ryan Fenton

    6. Re:This may also train the cat to... by RyanFenton · · Score: 2

      It would have to be heat-sensitive rather than pressure-sensitive. Unlike an enclosed camera, a pressure plate would quickly fall pray to accumulating dust, twigs, and other debris. If a newspaper or package were put on the pressure plate, for instance, then the cat could not get in.

      Even then, this is assuming live/dead prey and other undesired objects would be warm enough to differentiate from the background - which may in turn train the cat to only bring sufficiently old dead things back to the house. That may not be the desired result.

      :^)

      Ryan Fenton

    7. Re:This may also train the cat to... by 56ker · · Score: 1

      The tunnels thing sounds too complicated to do in practice - couldn't the camera just move left/ right and look for any dropped animals?

    8. Re:This may also train the cat to... by RyanFenton · · Score: 2


      Unlike the cat, random items would likely not be as simple to recognize. Because the door is outside, it is subject to unexpected change. For instance, if some landscaping blew over in front of the door, it might not be distinct enough to differentiate from prey that the can might bring in.

      Perhaps then a solution might be so create an intermediate step - a small "kitty airlock" where the cat must enter first, which is kept clean, and only if it appears to be just the cat will the cat be allowed in.

      :^)

      Ryan Fenton

    9. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or walk backwards through the door.

    10. Re:This may also train the cat to... by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Funny

      1. Drop the undesirable object.
      2. Trigger the door.
      3. Pick up undesirable object and walk through door.

      ...at which point you can submit a subsequent story:

      Cats can play Zork-style adventure games

      -- MarkusQ
    11. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's it! A kitty-airlock! We have a winner!

    12. Re:This may also train the cat to... by aozilla · · Score: 2

      at which point you can submit a subsequent story:

      Cat door causes cat mutation.

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    13. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could alway test whether it has anything in its mouth by doing the old "my voice is my password, recognise me." trick. Try doing that with a mouse in your mouth...

    14. Re:This may also train the cat to... by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      But since cats have no opposable thumbs, we'll have to wait for their forepaws to "mutate" so they can type :)

    15. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Before you know it the cat will get fucked off at all these cameras, tunnels, heat-sensitive pressure pads and so forth and will post a story to /.

      From the "concerned-cat-dept":
      "I mean, it's just such an invasion of privacy, scanning and probing me just so I can get in the house, which I have a God-given American right to do. Imagine, assuming all us felines are rodent and bird-murdering scum! And hey- even if I *did* happen to attack some small creature, wouldn't it be less cruel if we let it die inside in the warmth instead of out in the cold? Anyways, what next- ID cards?!?!?!?!?"

      graspee

    16. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 5, Funny

      " or walk backwards through the door."

      If the cat's arse resembles its face well enough to trigger the door then it needs to be inside so the other cats don't laugh at it...

      graspee

    17. Re:This may also train the cat to... by mofolotopo · · Score: 1

      Normally, you'd be right. It's almost impossible to train a cat to do something YOU want it to do. When it comes to comething THEY want to do, they're extremely flexible.

    18. Re:This may also train the cat to... by AnalogBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      two words: voice recognition.

      Now all we have to do is figure out catoneese.

      I know what "Mow Meow" means.. "Feed me, you stupid human".

      But meow meow meow, mow meow... i just dont understand. The inflection is a little different on the 2nd meow.

    19. Re:This may also train the cat to... by 56ker · · Score: 1

      Or a new story:

      Cat door leads to increased intelligence in cats

    20. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct, the proper solution is the expose an electrode so that the cat isn't only locked out but also get's a good zapping. Likewise a simple time mechanism that locks that cat out for about 5 minutes once it fails the test should do the trick.

    21. Re:This may also train the cat to... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      My cat likes to play fetch, she started dropping her ball in front of me. Maybe I'm wrong, she tought me how to throw the ball for her. (-; Very smart cat.

    22. Re:This may also train the cat to... by bakes · · Score: 2

      A cat goes into the post office and asks to send a telegram. The clerk tells the cat he can have 16 words for $5. The cat writes out the message:

      meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow

      The clerk says 'you can have another word - why not put "meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow meow".'

      The cat says "well, then it wouldn't make sense".

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    23. Re:This may also train the cat to... by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

      Sounds like a half-ass solution to me.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    24. Re:This may also train the cat to... by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      I already knew my cats could play Adventure. Whenever they walk across the keyboard (usually, to draw my attention away from Slashdot), they type "XYZZY."

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    25. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another variation on Pavlov's experiments.

    26. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Xiadix · · Score: 1

      The cat has alread been trained!

      If you watch the videos again. You will see that when entering the cat waits for the lock to click before trying to enter the house. This is why Flo uses its paw to open the door when trying to go outside. Watch the exit video. The cat walks up and puts it head right near the door and pauses. When it doesn't hear the click it steps back and then uses its paw to see if the door is open or not.

      I thin that is very interesting.

    27. Re:This may also train the cat to... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2
      Actually, given how the system is set up, I don't think the cat can drop the mouse or bird, trigger, and pick up. The cat has to drop the mouse and step on it with a paw before triggering the camera. The can then has to back up to pick up the mouse. If the system is set up properly, it will notice the cat does not look like a cat and will lock again.

      The workaround I see is the cat must leave the mouse alive enough (it's planning on playing and chasing it inside the house) so it can drop the mouse. The mouse runs forward past the light up to the door. The cat then passes by and gains access, picks up the mouse and enters normally.

      This could still be prevented by making sure the camera sees the mouse and compares the timing of the mouse and the cat images. If they are too close the cat will not be allowed in. Unless the cat wants to wait for a really long time with its arse sticking out unprotected from dogs and the like, this will stop the cat.

    28. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat's been posting to /. for years, under the name JonKatz. He can't get the hang of Unix pipes, though.

    29. Re:This may also train the cat to... by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

      Well, the lawyers will try to convince us that if our cat goes:
      meow, meow, meow, meow
      meow, meow, meow, meow...
      That means that the Meow Mix people have a strong copyright infringement case...

      --
      --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    30. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Rand+Race · · Score: 1

      With that malformed keister it sounds, to me, like a prime candidate for a catasstrophy.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    31. Re:This may also train the cat to... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This reminds me of the time I tried to prevent the cat from catching birds and stuff by putting a bell around his neck. The result: a faster and quieter hunter. Instead of alerting the birds about the cat, the cat would just find sneaker ways to pounce on his victim and not set off the bell around his neck (until it was too late for the bird anyway).

      Moral of the story: Give a cat a challenge, and s/he'll regard it as a challenge to solve.

  8. Kitty Kat... by rapidweather · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm feeding my cat Hill's Science Diet Hairball Control Formula, light. He comes in and eats that when he gets hungry. Too fat to catch anything, and the neighborhood dogs get first crack at the dead squirrels. He's not gonna bring anything in, and if he does, we'll fry it up and serve it for dinner!

  9. get out of my house! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can you use it to keep the pesky neighbor cats from terrorizing your house while you're away?

  10. Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Slashamatic · · Score: 5, Funny
    One of the issues is that the door is optically controlled. Great idea, but cats have been known to hold doors open once they have been unlocked.

    A lady friend of mine had a cat who would get lonely when she went out to work. She would return to find the cat there with half a dozen of her mates lounging around and scoffing at the cat food.

    She tried the magnetic collar. No good. It appears that the cat would prevent the door from closing until her friends were there. This was seen.

    You could imagine in this particular situation. Drop mouse on floor, smile for camera, door unlocks and then pick up mouse and enter. I don't think this would work too well. The moggy is too likely to work it out.

    Note the presentation of kills to a cats master or mistress is a sign of fealty. They are acknowledging your authority with the gift. If you don't greatfully accept the mouse/bird whatever, the cat will be bewildered!!!!!

    1. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by mdwebster · · Score: 1
      If you don't greatfully accept the mouse/bird whatever, the cat will be bewildered!!!!!

      OHNO! That's terrible! How come no one ever told me before?!? God forbid that a cat ever be bewildered!!!
    2. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sarcasm, I like it. Please keep it up.

    3. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can one up ya, we used to have this pursian cat, and it drank out of the toilets when it wanted water ... in our house by the bathroom door there was a sewing table. So one day Im walking down the hall and the bathroom door is closed ... The cat is standing on the sewing table pawing the door knob in what looked like a twisting motion. Im not sure the cat knew to twist the knob (it couldn't if it wanted to), but I think she had picked up that humans *used* the door knob in some capacity to open the door. End of story: I opened the door for her and she drank at the toilet.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    4. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      we have a cat that opens cubbords all the time - she knows where her food is, and how to get it. i figure if she is smart enough to do that, she deserves and extra meal.

      plus, she has opened doors using the doorknob before. it is rare, and usually takes her quite a while, but sometimes she gets it

    5. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OHNO! That's terrible! How come no one ever told me before?!? God forbid that a cat ever be bewildered!!!

      This sounds like a job for Confuse-A-Cat!

    6. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Slashamatic · · Score: 1
      Bewilderment leads to frustration.

      Frustration leads to extension of claws and attempt to take out such feelings on any suitable soft furnishings in vicinity. The more expensive the better (cats have an instinct for cost).

    7. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by bugg · · Score: 2
      If your cat is that intelligent, maybe it's time to fight back. Otherwise, it's just a matter of time before it learns where you keep the food, and then you become just another hunting target.

      Start locking doors. Buy a gun. Don't let your cat know you're planning anything. And then when the time is right... make your move.

      Seriously, I love cats (my own cat is watching me type this, and hopefully he won't be mad at me for this) but if your cat is being that destructive, something is wrong. The worst thing my cat has ever done is piss all over my clothes.

      --
      -bugg
    8. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by elmegil · · Score: 2
      if your cat is being that destructive.... The worst thing my cat has ever done is piss all over my clothes.

      Um, I'd say pissing all over your clothes is more destructive than bringing friends over for a meal.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    9. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by MsWillow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ny sister had a cat who ficured out how to open the fridge. One thanksgiving, after everything was put away and she and her husband were in bed, they awoke to hear a terrible loud crash from downstairs. When John turned on the light, cats scattered from the turkey carcass - all but the one who opened the door. Sluggo wasn't leaving till he'd eaten his fill :)

      She has since learned to wedge a diningroom chair so as to keep the door from being opened. She still has to do this, many years after Sluggo passed on, because he taught the other cats how.

      Cats are much smarter than people think. Sluggo would have laughed at this feeble attempt to constrain him :)

      --

      Lemon curry?
    10. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by zephc · · Score: 2

      Indeed, my mom's last cat China Blue (rest her little soul) would not eat meat cuts that were under $5/lb. =] Filet Minion was a favorite. Cat's really are very finicky

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    11. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Mr_Kcleen · · Score: 1

      Lol, cats are great. My friend's cat one day opened a sealed package of gummy savers and ate the entire package.

    12. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bewilderment leads to frustration.

      Frustration leads to extension of claws

      extension of claws leads to the dark side

      consume you it will

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    13. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by HRbnjR · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And I can one up you as well.

      My cat used to do the same thing, to get outside, only stitting on the large deep freeze next to the back door. It would sit on the deepfreeze with it's paw on the knob, and pat at it when someone would walk by.

      The good part was getting back in. It used to sit on the wood pile next to the steps at the back. Naturally, sitting there it would see friends come over and ring the door bell, and we would let them in. It didn't take very long before it learned to ring the door bell to get into the house too!

    14. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by shogun · · Score: 2

      Damn you beat me to posting that link. ;-]

    15. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      I had a cat that opened fridges once (his name was Tink because we couldn't tink of another name, but that's beside the point). It was all very well, we'd have to keep something infront of the fridge all the time to stop him.

      However one day, he came home with an unopened packet of bacon that he'd obviosuly filched from somebody elses fridge :-)

      Our current 10 cats though are all to lazy to actually open fridges to get thier food, they are much more content to have it handed to them :-)

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    16. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dog does this too. The only solution I've found it to place a nice heavy CRT monitor (I'm a geek, so of course I've got a few spares lying around) in front of the door. Anything lighter and it gets pushed aside.

    17. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by dynoman7 · · Score: 1

      My childhood cat used to do the same thing...would giggle the loose and klunky old doorknob when stuck inside the attic.

      --
      Blarf.
    18. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Kewlhand`tek · · Score: 0

      my cat can open doors too, the bedroom door doesnt really catch well and he just rams it open but if its closed and he is inside he grabs the bottom of the door with his paw and opens it. he gets into cupboards that way too...but when is them the door closes, you have a heck of a time finding him

      --
      The Arkie Libertarian
    19. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by bugg · · Score: 2

      Well I wasn't wearing them at the time.http://slashdot.org/search.pl?topic=99

      --
      -bugg
    20. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by DeadMeat+(TM) · · Score: 2

      When I was a kid, we had a cat that actually figured out how to open doors. He'd jump up at the knob and grab it on the way down, which would turn the knob and knock the door open just enough that he could open it the rest of the way with his paw. My parents eventually had to start locking doors they didn't want him to get out of.

    21. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Pyrrus · · Score: 1

      your cat is obiously not as dumb as mine..
      it turns out that he is dumber than other cats, as *they* know how to open the screen door to our house, but our cat does not

    22. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Jeffv323 · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid the problem here is not that the cat learned how to ring the doorbell, but rather your "friends" think it's funny to ring the doorbell and watch you become amazed at the cat's newfound "talent"

      --
      I'm a minister!
    23. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      I once owned a very hyperactive cat that would at times drive me crazy enough to put it into a bedroom and close the door until it calmed down. This proved a deterrant for about three months, after which the cat discovered that it could jump up and wrap both forelegs about the door knob, then rock back and forth until the knob turned enough to open the door.

      It took me awhile to figure out exactly how the cat was getting the door open, but damn me if I wasn't impressed once I saw her actually do it. Most cats seem to be too stupid to master this trick, but those like my former pet-from-hell will no doubt figure out the camera system fairly quickly.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    24. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid YOU have a problem actually believing amazing stuff can happen in your life. DO YOU REALLY THINK 8 INCHES ARE ENOUGH?!?? CUM AND SEE WHAT FANTASTIC PRICES WE GOT ON PENIS ENLARGERS! 20 INCHES SHOULD BE ABOUT RIGHT FOR EVERYBODY!!!

      (Come on people, it's a joke ;)

    25. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by armb · · Score: 2

      > but I think she had picked up that humans *used* the door knob in some capacity to open the door.

      We used to have a cat that could open a door with a lever handle. (A round knob would be trickier).

      --
      rant
    26. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by GTRacer · · Score: 2
      Our cat Tony tries very hard to open our front door. We have the kind of lock with the push-down thumb lever. Every so often, usually in the dead of night, Tony will jump up to the lock and paw at the lever. This goes on for 5-10 minutes at a time.

      He's not yet figured out that he has to somehow push the door forward (and it's pretty stiff in the frame so it takes a bit of effort anyway) but one day, his timing is going to be perfect (and the door unlocked) and he'll come barreling into the house on his own.

      Then all will be lost because he'll share his knowledge and our privacy and security will forever be in danger!

      GTRacer
      - Cats 0wnz j00

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    27. Re:Sorry Cats are too intelligent by wjr · · Score: 1

      Filet Minion was a favorite.


      Our cats like to filet their minions (i.e., us) as well. Those back claws were designed to eviscerate, after all.
  11. The real question is. by tcd004 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not how well the system works but, how long before you cat outsmarts the system.

    Read our Oscar Predictions
    tcd004

    1. Re:The real question is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      42 minutes.

    2. Re:The real question is. by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Not how well the system works but, how long before you cat outsmarts the system."

      At that point, the cat would be arrested under the DMCA for breaking an anti-circumvention device.

  12. A more sophisticated approach... by Alexis+Morissette · · Score: 1

    How about just placing a sign above the cat door: "NO HALF-DEAD RATS ALLOWED"?

    --
    This is a special excite .sig
    This
    1. Re:A more sophisticated approach... by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      And if your cat comes in with 'half-dead rats' you can even sue him for circumventing your security.
      That is if you were unlucky enough to be living in the US...

      Luckily I don't have either problem :)

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:A more sophisticated approach... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      The problem with that, is that most cats refuse to learn english, it's an arrogance thing. Though, my cats are slowly teaching me Catinese, or whatever its called, so maybe I'll be able to write the sign in their language. They'll just ignore it though.

  13. Idea for a Dog Door by Emugamer · · Score: 5, Funny

    have the same setup as this type of auto-locking door except have some sort of scent detecting algorithm that won't let them in if they have been:

    rolling around in a dead animal carcass

    eating the trash

    sprayed by a skunk

    decided to swim in the neighborhood swamp

    If any of these 4 conditions apply, apply auto-hose and shampoo... (mini dog-wash)

    I'd make millions, really

    1. Re:Idea for a Dog Door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Considering how well the average dog behaves, you would ensure that owners of your device never see thier pet in the house...

    2. Re:Idea for a Dog Door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should thank the superior canis race for your own survival, you pitty human. Without them your home, your willage would be soiled by cat piss, cat extrement, cat puke and all the other hazardous materials cats produce (and consist of).

      You should celebrate when dogs prey on a cat, just as you celebrate your life.

      It's that important.

    3. Re:Idea for a Dog Door by TeldakSS · · Score: 1

      don't forget:
      -holding your girlfriend/wife's cat in it's mouth
      -rolling around in your fece-fertilized garden
      -shedding
      -getting ready to blow chunks

  14. The mark 2 by 56ker · · Score: 4, Funny

    gives the cat an electric shock & pours cold water over it if it tries to come in with a dead mouse. :o)

    1. Re:The mark 2 by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I was right with you until you added "IF it tries to come in with a dead mouse." Where's the fun in THAT?

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    2. Re:The mark 2 by nslu · · Score: 1

      not funny. at all. :-| i guess you should get long electroshock-in-salt-water treatment to get rid of such thoughts.

    3. Re:The mark 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you should get a sense of humor

  15. I have the solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bell around the neck! There, saved *months* of research!

    1. Re:I have the solution! by Omega+Prime · · Score: 0

      Actually its been proven that by putting a bell around the neck of a cat when it is young they become much more efficant hunters, as they learn to move without disturbing the bell

      - When you can snatch the ram from my hand, then you will be ready -IT ninja

      --
      "We deal in lead" - Roland of Gilead
  16. What about other cats? by rehannan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Very cool. It seems to be pretty good at blocking other animals (skunks, etc...), but what about another cat?

    If possible, they should combine the image recognition with the magnetic collar. This would allow the door to open *only* for a rodent-less Flo and not just any ol' rodent-less cat.

    1. Re:What about other cats? by jheinen · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you look through the whole site you'll see tht the system can apparently recognize individual cats. There are two other cats that are allowed in (Ellipse & Squirrel). There's a log page that logs each day's events and identifies each cat by name and whether they were allowed in.

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    2. Re:What about other cats? by Anders · · Score: 1

      It seems to be pretty good at blocking other animals (skunks, etc...), but what about another cat?

      As noted on their index page, their software has a new feature: "our image recognition algorithm can now determine which of the two cats is entering.".

      You can even watch it in real time. The pictures will have a label telling the name of the cat that was allowed access.

      Cute :-).

    3. Re:What about other cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But does the system greet them and pronounce in a computer generated voice, "Good day to you, (cat name here)" ???? i mean, what type of a system would it be without this feature?? =P (on the other hand, the thing could say, "SKAT!!!" to stray cats trying to gain access)

    4. Re:What about other cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Except for the fact that according to that log, Ellipse has not entered the house since at least Feb 23. (that's as far back as I bothered to browse) Specifically note Feb 26 and Mar 4, where Squirrel enters the house, then magically transports himself back outside and enters again.

    5. Re:What about other cats? by rehannan · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I see that now. However, I'll be really impressed when they can try 100 different cats and it still only lets Flo, Ellipse, and Squirrel in.

      When they get to that stage, I'm sure these things would sell like hot cakes. Just "initialize" the "Flo-Control Cat Door" with pictures of your cats and you're done.

    6. Re:What about other cats? by tulare · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're forgetting about the ever-popular feline pastime of lurking quietly out of sight until a human happens to open the door with a double armload of groceries, at which time said feline makes a mad dash out of the door, which of course causes said groceries to become scattered about the entryway. Of course, it does save the cat the trouble of opening the cat door. Not that I've seen this happen in, say the last fifteen minutes or anything...

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    7. Re:What about other cats? by slasho81 · · Score: 1

      And what about those rats coming in with dead cats in their mouths, huh?

  17. Okay, I got to admit... by wilkinsm · · Score: 1

    ...This is pretty cool. This sort of stuff should really be submitted to Scientific American's "The Amateur Scientist" as well.

    1. Re:Okay, I got to admit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Amateur Scientist" hasn't been an active column for a long time now.

    2. Re:Okay, I got to admit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm...Well, that helps to explain why I stopped reading SciAm of late. That and "Mathmatical Recreations" were the best part (with connections a distance third.)

  18. Live art project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hey, thanks.

    You just gave me a perfect idea for live art project! Dump the dog, bring on the artist.

  19. isnt that against nature? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1

    why punish cats for doing what cats do?

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:isnt that against nature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck nature.

      Don't tell me you wouldn't train a dog to not shit on the floors inside.

    2. Re:isnt that against nature? by FredGray · · Score: 3
      why punish cats for doing what cats do?

      This device doesn't really punish the cat. It just keeps the less desirable animals out of the house.

    3. Re:isnt that against nature? by HanzoSan · · Score: 3, Troll

      cats catch mice, thats what they do

      see thats why i dont believe in having house pets

      having pets are fine when you are ina cabin in the woods, but when you torture a cat or dog keeping it locked up in a house, and over feed it, then modify its behavior with gadgets like this, i just feel its wrong.

      Let the cat be a cat

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    4. Re:isnt that against nature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think your parents were wrong for modifying your behavior? Teaching you not to shit on the floor, not to steal, etc.

    5. Re:isnt that against nature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should humans not use their ingenuity to affect desired changes? Isn't that natural? Isn't that what humans do?

    6. Re:isnt that against nature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because it's fun?
      because they pie in your shoes?
      because they poop in your childrens play ground?
      because they claw your childrens eyes out?
      because, because!

    7. Re:isnt that against nature? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Stupid, this is my natural behavior, why do anonymous cowards always make such idiotic comments like " Do you think your parents were wrong for modifying your behavior? Teaching you not to shit on the floor, not to steal, etc."

      Since you believe cats are human, why dont you go have sex with one, and when you have kittens, you can teach them not to shit on the floor, steal, etc.

      This is stuff humans dont need to be taught, its called reason, morals, would you want to clean shit up off the floor? No. So you wont do it. Would you like people to steal from you? No you wouldnt so why do it to someone else?

      Its simple logic, a cat is not capable of understanding this, they just know they will get punished if they dont obey.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    8. Re:isnt that against nature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cats are not tortured when you keep it locked in a house. unlike dogs they are solitary animals anyways. you modify their behavior any time you feed it, or let it out in the the first place.

      housecats and dogs really couldn't survive in the wild in the first place.

    9. Re:isnt that against nature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid, this is my natural behavior, why do anonymous cowards always make such idiotic comments like "Do you think your parents were wrong for modifying your behavior? Teaching you not to shit on the floor, not to steal, etc."

      Because you're trolling by pretending not to understand that all of your 'reasonable, moral' behaviour is learned, and troll's don't deserve real names.

    10. Re:isnt that against nature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you torture a cat or dog keeping it locked up in a house, and over feed it, then modify its behavior with gadgets like this, i just feel its wrong.

      Do you use a toilet or do you shit in the woods?

    11. Re:isnt that against nature? by elmegil · · Score: 1

      The cat is perfectly allowed to be a cat. S/he just has to eat the prey outside the house.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    12. Re:isnt that against nature? by shatteredpottery · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, if you believe the U.S. Attorney General, John Ashcroft, cats aren't natural anyway. At least not Calicos. They're tools of Satan or something (it's near the end of the article.)

      So you're actually assisting in the battle against evil when you deal harshly with cats.

      FWIW, my sister's cat has almost convinced me that Ashcroft is right.

      --

      A witty saying is worth nothing - Voltaire

    13. Re:isnt that against nature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the cat be a cat

      Unfortunately it's too late for that. There are already too many cats, and not enough room for them.

    14. Re:isnt that against nature? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 5, Funny

      "when you torture a cat or dog keeping it locked up in a house, and over feed it, then modify its behavior with gadgets like this, i just feel its wrong"

      In the house all the time ?
      Over-feeding ?
      Change its life with gadgets ?

      If it's good enough for me, it's good enough for the cats...

      graspee

    15. Re:isnt that against nature? by gartogg · · Score: 2

      We should not modify Hmman behaviours.
      When you have a child, you should not train it to talk, eat with utensils, etc. It is perverting it's nature.

      Saying that it is wrong to train a creature to respond to stimulus in a manner thatyou prefer is asinine.

      Moreover; If the perogative of living creatures is to seek pleasure, and it brings humans pleasure to train other creatures to perform certain tasks, than it is our perogative to do that, otherwise we are perverting our own natures. And that is wrong.

      --
      I'm a concientious .sig objector.
    16. Re:isnt that against nature? by chhamilton · · Score: 1

      but when you torture a cat or dog keeping it locked up in a house, and over feed it, then modify its behavior with gadgets like this

      He's not torturing his cat by keeping it locked up, but rather giving it free reign to follow it's cat instincts, and go hunting at all hours of the night. What he is doing, however, is preventing the cat from dragging kills into his house and making a mess.

      While this may modify the cats behavior in the long run, I can't see how it would be considered a harmful modification; it's not directly discouraging anything inherent in the cat's nature.

      But, on the topic of keeping cats and dogs as entirely inside pets, I agree; I find that pretty unappealing and somewhat cruel.

    17. Re:isnt that against nature? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      Cats don't naturally use toilets but i got mine to do so anyway. What I want to do now is train him to flush (some kind of foot pedal) or rig the toilet to flush automatically after he uses it.

      I tell you though, it's the best. I absolutely hate cleaning litter boxes and it's a friggin joy not having to do so.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    18. Re:isnt that against nature? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a cat who was very capable of understanding what happened when she shit on the floor. It stinks.

      It didn't take long before I would find the cat sleeping in one room and find a pile of shit in another room on the other side of the house.

      I solved this problem with an appropriately placed litter box, and when I found shit anywhere else, by carrying the cat into the other room and reminding her of the mess she had made.

      The cat learned fast. In fact, it was interesting to watch her litter box behavior following this training. The cat hated the smell of her shit so much, that when she urinated in the litter box, she'd take the time to bury it, but when she had to poop, she'd just drop the shit and run for it! Almost always buried the pee, but never even tried to bury the poo.

    19. Re:isnt that against nature? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      'nature' is a human concept, and thus anything we define it as being. If we decide that finding dead, disemboweled rodents on the living room floor is 'unnatural' at 3 in the bloody a.m. (or worse, stepping in the carcass on our way to the bathroom), then it's damned well unnatural. As well as gross.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    20. Re:isnt that against nature? by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

      Wrong, Humans talk naturally, its our nature to do so, thats why we all speak.

      Trying to force something to be what its not is wrong, its wrong to try to force a cat to live like a human.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    21. Re:isnt that against nature? by Monte · · Score: 1

      ...but when you torture a cat or dog keeping it locked up in a house, and over feed it, then modify its behavior with gadgets like this, i just feel its wrong.

      It's not much different than sending kids to public school...

  20. will this work on my mother? by augros · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i'm interested in whether this will have deterring value. will the cat eventually give up bringing rodents in? or come in less? the pictures of the skunk and bird are a riot; it's like caller ID for animals!

  21. i thought.. by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    i thought i was a geek when i nuetered my cuecat, but this way beyond that.

    i love it though, now if i only had the money for a digital camera...

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    1. Re:i thought.. by codework · · Score: 1

      now if i only had the money for a digital camera...

      There a guy with a free digital camera in a wooden box fixed to his backdoor somewhere.
      .j

  22. Re:Cats are monsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But master, I only want to be your friend. I'd hate anything to happen to you, master.

    --Your future dog

  23. I wonder... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...if CmdrTaco could set a virtual one of these up on Slashdot for JohnKatz, not letting him in if he's got a article in hand...

    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cats don't have pockets to stuff articles into.

    2. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, but you have an ass where I can stuff your comment.

  24. Cat reasoning by dolphin558 · · Score: 0

    Will the cat learn to not bring anymore dead animals from this technology? I can see how it saves you from going to the door and finding out for yourself but this does nothing to help train your cat NOT to bring dead animals in.

  25. Re:Cats are monsters by torqer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dogs are poop machines. I'd rather own a predator (i.e. cat) than having to cart around a dumb animal's(i.e. dog's) feces in a plastic bag... immediately after it has just produced said poop.

  26. Re:Cats are monsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dogs are just as capable of killing, they just usually eat the whole thing, rather than bringing it back in.

  27. weight by llevylyn · · Score: 0

    Hi, It seems to me that it'd be quite difficult to determine whether your cat carries some prey by image recognition. First of all there are various different, possibly partially dismembered, types of animals it could potentially drag in. Secondly your cat might not always give you a nice upfront image (although that could be circumvented I guess). Furthermore you'd want to have pretty good lightning conditions at all times (I assume your cat goes out at night as well).
    Also, the color of your cat might play a role. If your cat would eg be snow white that would certainly help things too :) (in that case you could eg make the snow white cat stand in front of a snow white piece of cardboard and just look at color values and hope it didn't make itself dirty while outside :) )
    Perhaps this'd be an idea though: put some form of scale in front of the cat entrance. If it exceeds, your cats weight + some, deny entry. Of course there'd also be some problems with this you'd have to sort out. Also I'm not sure how much the weight of your cat varies per day, although my guess is that its less then the weight of a bird (don't have a cat myself) If your cat actually eats prey outside this might be a problem though :)
    anyway, just my 2ct

    1. Re:weight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the mouse is in the cat's belly it'd weigh the same.

    2. Re:weight by tulare · · Score: 2

      Hmm... looks like you really should have bothered to look at the site. Anyhow, what I find most amusing are the number of false blocks in the log pages. I can imagine my own feline creature dealing with the door not opening when it really should. Probably by knocking out the living room window. Of course, he only weighs eighteen or twenty pounds and isn't fat. But can you imagine the racket caused by a pissed-off cat banging on a locked kitty door at four in the morning? According to the logs, it is in fact what must have happened :)

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
  28. Re:wouldn't it be nice if you didn't nick my joke by 56ker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    & get three mod points for it?
    The words (Score:1)
    by 56ker on Sunday March 24, @09:00PM (#3217047)
    (User #566853 Info | http://www.level80.co.uk/)


    haven't they got something better to do with their time? spring to mind.

    Oh well - c'est la vie.

  29. Re:Cats are monsters by darkonc · · Score: 5, Funny
    I once had two cats in an area that didn't seem to have many of them. It was rather interesting. They'd bring in a mouse or a bird almost every other day. They'd eat the birds (leaving behind what I cam to call 'bird bits' -- beaks, feathers, etc., but they'd leave the mice for me as 'gifts'.

    Then one day, when I was sick, I got up to go to the bathroom and found that they'd left me a bird. I was touched by the gesture... I thanked them heartfully -- and burried the bird.
    _____

    Then, of course, there was the day that my larger cat brought in a seagull... completely freaked my roommate out.

    Or when their mother (they were born to the cat of an earlier incarnation of roommate) brought in a whole pot roast for her kittens (with the string still on). I have no idea where she got a pot roast from, but I'm sure that somebody's barbecue was inexplicably short that day.
    They were eating peices off of that pot roast for the better part of a week.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  30. He knows more about technology than cats. by dbc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I grant that this is very clever, and gets many tech cool points. However...


    Mother cats teach their young to hunt, first by bringing dead animals to the nest, then not-quite-dead animals, and finally injured but fairly lively prey. When the youngters can dispatch a wiggling dinner, they are ready to go on a hunt. What cats are doing when they bring dead or nearly-dead animals to the house is they are trying to teach the slow-witted and lazy humans that they live with to hunt!! We just don't get it.


    Never has a cat had a student more resistant to instruction.

    1. Re:He knows more about technology than cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What cats are doing when they bring dead or nearly-dead animals to the house is they are trying to teach the slow-witted and lazy humans that they live with to hunt!! We just don't get it.


      No, I think THEY don't get it. We don't need to hunt like that.


      Dumb cats.

    2. Re:He knows more about technology than cats. by RedWizzard · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What cats are doing when they bring dead or nearly-dead animals to the house is they are trying to teach the slow-witted and lazy humans that they live with to hunt!!
      I think it's the other way round - most cats see us as the parents, especially if they've been raised from kittens. When they bring live animals to you they are looking for recognition that they are hunting properly. Apparently if you make a point of playing with the prey for a while they stop doing it.
    3. Re:He knows more about technology than cats. by Kris_J · · Score: 4, Funny
      Apparently if you make a point of playing with the prey for a while they stop doing it.
      Does taking a clueless and un-injured mouse from two equally clueless cats, walking out to the back garden and flinging it over the fence count?

      You should see our cats with a mouse -- the mouse typically runs into the nearest corner and then our cats just stare at it. Occasionally one will go up and tap it. Once it obviously grabbed hold of a paw because there was a sudden flicking of said paw as if to say "Eww, get if off!", mouse lobs off into distance then runs straight back to the same corner. It was pathetic.

      Now, if they'd just stop bring geckos into the house...

    4. Re:He knows more about technology than cats. by Pentagram · · Score: 2

      There's no reason why cats don't think of us in terms of parents sometimes and offspring at other times. I wouldn't bestow upon them such a consistent mental model. I don't think generally kittens bring prey back to their parents either.

    5. Re:He knows more about technology than cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, In some respects I think they regard themselfs as kittens. Adult lions, vild cats etc don't purr. Cat's brought up by humans continues to purr occasionally throughout life.

    6. Re:He knows more about technology than cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mother cats teach their young to hunt, first by bringing dead animals to the nest

      Since when do cats live in nests?

    7. Re:He knows more about technology than cats. by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 1

      They bring the geckos in so that they can catch the flies that the cats are too slow or close to the ground to catch. Its a symbiot relationship. Cat gives gecko food. Gecko gets rid of pest. Cat gets rid of gecko.

    8. Re:He knows more about technology than cats. by RedWizzard · · Score: 2

      Cats that have been raised from kittenhood as pets retain many of the characteristics of kittens - essentially they never grow up mentally. They are more playful than kittens raised in the wild and they continue to use sounds that "naturally" raised kittens stop using when they reach adulthood. Kittens do bring prey back to their mothers when they are learning to hunt, too.

    9. Re:He knows more about technology than cats. by Monte · · Score: 1

      Since when do cats live in nests?

      Since they started having kittens and needed a place to keep them safe. Look up the definition of "nest".

  31. More pet cams.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    pet cams at camville

    Really cool though.

  32. Got to by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 3, Funny

    love the irony. Here I am reading an article about facial reconition for a cat, after skimming the comments I read the slashdot quote at the bottom of the page.

    "All most men really want in life is a wife, a house, two kids and a car, a cat, no maybe a dog. Ummm, scratch one of the kids and add a dog. Definitely a dog. "

    --
    >
  33. Re:Cats are monsters - Bird Book. by refactored · · Score: 5, Funny
    I always wanted a book entitled - "Identification of Common garden Birds and small Mammals - A field guide for Cat lovers."

    I'm sure with a digital camera and a good ratter, you could go quite far....

    Someone could create a web site where you can submit photos of your own moggies trophies, and assist other proud owners in their identification and interpretation of entrails.

    I remember walking, zombie-like at 2am to the bathroom and been struck by the question. "Why is there a large Rat, buried up to the neck in the concrete floor?"

    Then my cat came up proudly going WowWowWowrrrr!

    Closer inspection reveal that the rat wasn't buried, it was just that the rest of it was missing, presumably regurgitated under my bed.

  34. Re:wouldn't it be nice if you didn't nick my joke by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yeah. i saw yours after i posted mine. if you'll notice, there's a 1 minute difference. *hug*

    --
    sig - .
  35. Re:Cats are monsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Get a basset hound. They eat their own poop, will bite your hand if you try to pick it up before they can get to it.

  36. Cat scan by Anders · · Score: 1

    It seems someone should mention the Cat Scan site.

    There! Someone did :-).

  37. Cats and Birdkill by FFFish · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    From several web sources:

    "Despite the difficulties in showing the effect most predators have on their prey, cats are known to have serious impacts on small mammals and birds. Worldwide, cats may have been involved in the extinction of more bird species than any other cause, except habitat destruction."

    "Most domesticated cats gobble endless bags of cat chow. But they also like dining outdoors where their meals comprise 70 percent small mammals, 20 percent birds, and 10 percent assorted live bait. "

    "Cats cause the deaths of more songbirds than any other animal. ...an outdoor cat can kill up to 1,000 animal per year."

    " The combined total of pets and free-ranging cats in the U.S. is probably more than 100 million."

    "...rural free-ranging domestic cats in Wisconsin may be killing between 8 and 217 million birds each year. The most reasonable estimates indicate that 39 million birds are killed in the state each year. Nationwide, rural cats probably kill over a billion small mammals and hundreds of millions of birds each year. Urban and suburban cats add to this toll."

    It may be argued that responsible cat owners not only neuter their cats, but also keep them strictly indoors or on a leash.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Cats and Birdkill by maroberts · · Score: 1

      But they also like dining outdoors where their meals comprise 70 percent small mammals, 20 percent birds, and 10 percent assorted live bait

      Sounds about right...a very good reason to have a cat IMO, keeps the number of moles in the vicinity right down, and my lawn free of little earthen molehills

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    2. Re:Cats and Birdkill by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      It may be argued that responsible cat owners not only neuter their cats, but also keep them strictly indoors or on a leash.

      In more news, it's estimated that birds cause the death of more worms than any other animal. So cats are eating birds. They're probably replacing the other small mammals that no longer live near human populated areas.

    3. Re:Cats and Birdkill by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Maybe those birds and other wild creatures are unfit to survive.

      Would you rather have the mice, rats, and other pests killed by your cat or running around freaking out old ladies?

    4. Re:Cats and Birdkill by renehollan · · Score: 2

      Also, I've been told that keeping a cat indoors greatly extends it's life expectancy. A cat free to roam lives about two years, I'm told. I have had a (neutered) Persian cat for about 10 years now, and he is happy to remain inside.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    5. Re:Cats and Birdkill by joib · · Score: 2

      Hrm.. you mean wild cats, right? Of course, wild animals tend to die quite young, i.e. they get wounded and thus unable to catch some chow, or alternatively unable to escape from predators. Or simply when they get older, again, they get too weak to hunt / escape. Cruel perhaps but that's the way nature is. Compared to a domestical animal which gets food no matter in which shape it is, gets medical attention etc. To return to the age issue, my parents have a 14 year old cat which is free to roam around, and I know lots of people who have cats which are free to roam around, and barring any accidents, they tend to live like 15-20 years. Personally, I think that going outside is healthy for a cat, mentally as well as physically. Hunting is in their nature, after all. Keep in mind that animals in general are much more steered by instincts than humans, and preventing the animal from acting according to said instincts might well make it 'blow a fuse'. There was actually a recent article about this in new scientist, btw, if you're interrested..

    6. Re:Cats and Birdkill by Zazm · · Score: 1

      Dear FFFish,

      Perhaps you should consider more carefully the very information you reference. Allow me to quote: "than any other cause, except habitat destruction."

      Based on your information it could be argued that responsible cats should neuter their owners and keep them indoors on a leash.

      When you can come to me with a straight face and tell me that you have put more into the environment than you have taken from it and that you've never hit an animal with your car then you can preach to me about keeping my cat on a leash.

      I'm glad to have my little rodent desctructor around, she keeps the rats at bay.

    7. Re:Cats and Birdkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put your cat on a leash.
      There, I said it.

      A good thing to keep in mind for cat owners though, is that I sued (and eventually settled out of court) my neighbor when his cat broke in to the rabbit cage and killed 2 of my rabbits. That was $6000 for the two rabbits. Now you have a good reason to keep your cats in the house.

      Wild life is one thing, domestic animals are quite another. If you have a domestic animal, it will need to live by the rules. If you want it to live a wild life, then stop caring for it, it's no longer a pet.

    8. Re:Cats and Birdkill by maroberts · · Score: 1

      My answer to this is:

      Given two options:
      a) live a normal life of freedom
      b) live for 200 years in a 10x6 cell

      which would you choose?
      Its obvious that cats should where possible be free to roam. The only exception to this is in city/major urban areas where I accept the possibility of the cat becoming roadkill is high.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    9. Re:Cats and Birdkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If we look away from stereotypical views of our pets for a while, dogs are actually excellent rat & mole hunters as well. They're not too good at mice and birds though, too small to catch their attention.

      My sister's dogs can when hunting/playing track down the moles by listening to their underground digging/scuffling. When they have a "lock on target" they dig frenetically and catch the little prey. Beats out watching Animal Planet anytime :-)

    10. Re:Cats and Birdkill by renehollan · · Score: 2

      You points are noted, and we've let the cat wander the fenced-in yard, but he appears frightened by the outside noises. Perhaps the fact that he was neutered and generally spent his entire life inside might have something to do with it.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    11. Re:Cats and Birdkill by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Thanks for the New Scientist link, but I have noted no stress on the part of the cat. Perhaps having been neutered had something to do with it. We have let him wander a large fenced-in year, but he appears frightened by outdoor noises and prefers to stay inside.

      While I don't doubt your success with cats living a full life and being free to wander, I've found that this is rarely the case in urban/suburban areas.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    12. Re:Cats and Birdkill by FFFish · · Score: 2

      What an astounding amount of hostility and ignorance. It appears that I completely underestimated how attached people are to allowing their cats to roam around killing things. Can't say truthful things about moggies, apparently: must toe the line and naively assume that the little creatures are carrying out a necessary and benevolent role in our ecosystem.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  38. Didn't read the webpage, eh? by rarose · · Score: 2

    If you had, you'd realize what an elegent solution they'd come with for all of those problems!

    Geez....

    --
    --Rob
  39. I like the daily log of cat activity by hattig · · Score: 5, Informative
    It does show some false negatives though: 4th March

    But pretty neat. And the site has withstood Slashdot somehow - something that bigger sites fail on regularly.

    1. Re:I like the daily log of cat activity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hmmm, the cat hasn't tried to bring in any prey for 2 or three months now. Last non-cat related item of interest is: http://www.quantumpicture.com/watchpic/day0110.htm which appears to be a bird with long legs being stupid in the middle of a cat throughfare.

      Heh, should have encoded the year into the URLs...

    2. Re:I like the daily log of cat activity by Akumapwr · · Score: 1, Funny

      Slashdot is becoming weaker! We need to start logging onto sites on 5-10 machines at a time! Must wreak havoc! Must wreak Hacov! Must.. mussttt.... rreeechhkkkkkkk Akuampwr has got link dead.

    3. Re:I like the daily log of cat activity by Akumapwr · · Score: 0

      According to the record of time and amount of the traffic this site has sustained I would imagine he has a DS3 or OC+ connection. Thus, he is not only a techy but he must have enough money for mad experments that involve die sexin' cats n' stuff

    4. Re:I like the daily log of cat activity by moyix · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the home page. This isn't a lone hacker, it's an image detection company that did this as a neat trick.

    5. Re:I like the daily log of cat activity by moyix · · Score: 1

      In my experience, false rejections are a LOT more common than false acceptances when doing any type of automatic image matching (face recognition, cat recognition, whatever). On the system I set up (a really hackish and amateur one, to be sure), we only got one false acceptance and a pretty large number of false rejections.

      If you want to know more about what I was working on, um... too bad, I haven't documented it except in this slashdot comment.

      The link to the source code given in that comment is outdated, though, use this one.

    6. Re:I like the daily log of cat activity by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      Okay, so it's not purr-fect, but it's still pretty cool.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    7. Re:I like the daily log of cat activity by hattig · · Score: 1
      Of course false positives are fine - let the cat stay outside even if it doesn't have a mouse or bird.

      False negatives would be a problem of course, as then you are still getting cat offerings inside the house. So if you ensure very low false negatives at the expense of getting more false positives then fine.

      So yes, this situation is acceptable for a cat flap monitoring program.

    8. Re:I like the daily log of cat activity by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much weaker the slashdot effect is on a Sunday as opposed to if this was posted Monday?

  40. Re:Cats are monsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, just like a self upgrading linux distro!

  41. IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if i had a cat that was constantly dragging half dead creatures into the house such as rats or birds, only to have them drip blood all over the carpet and potentially harm the children by attack or spreading disease, i can't think of anything more practical to spend your time developing.

    1. Re:IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! We must protect the itty bitty children from nasty diseases!

      Ya big wuss.

  42. Re:wouldn't it be nice if you didn't nick my joke by 56ker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    :0) Oh we both thought of it at the same time - but you did less typing - ok? Anyway I just got another of my funny comments modded up to 4 so I'm happy enough now.

  43. Re:wouldn't it be nice if you didn't nick my joke by 56ker · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It seems to have got modded back down to 2 - so it can't have been as funny as we thought.

  44. Essence of Conditioning by seinethinker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a scientist by heart, this is a very interesting and crafty experiment. Of course it works off the findings of Pavlov's Conditioning.

    You are conditioning the cat to either (1) drop the dead animal if it wishes to come inside or (2) remain outdoors.

    As a animal lover, it bothers me should this actually be put to use as a consistant system. Whether humans understand or not, animals are far more intelligent than we think. The behavior of animals is quite instinctual and what would be the circumstances if we were to change their modes of thinking. Would it be possible by to ascertain that one of the following things might happen from this experiment:

    (1) Cat runs away as it instinctually cannot assert its confidence. Much comparison has been made between dogs and cats. Cats seem predestined to take a singluar, individualistic, confident role in the food chain compared to dogs that rely on a class of relationship or borg mentality. Well dogs aren't completely borg but they seek out affection more out of insecurity and reassurance than cats.

    (2) cat becomes feral or wild due to lack of fealty and companionship toward owner.

    Cats aren't complete loners, ya' know.

    Just some thoughts to cast out for conversation.

    Ciao!

    --
    Truth like surgery, may hurt, but it cures. - Han Suyin, Chinese Physician and Writer
    1. Re:Essence of Conditioning by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      I'm not buying this argument. Consider plain wooden doors with a knob or a latch. These are completely artificial inventions that prevent cats from going places. Cats accept these. If a cat is born knowing the way outside the house is through this door with a light, why is it going to not accept this? The cat has no idea it is being scanned. It only knows not to try and bring things in or it will not succeed. It might think the door is watching it, but so what? Am I bothered when I know a security camera might have a man watching the monitor instead of just getting directly stored to tape? Not really. It depends on the circumstance. I doubt cats are smart enough to understand this distinction anyway.

    2. Re:Essence of Conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first this"As a scientist by heart,.. "

      then later:"Whether humans understand or not, animals are far more intelligent than we think."

      Please be a scientist by BRAIN.

      How do you know that? can you prove that?what is your critera? sheesh.

  45. Good lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean like posting 125 comments on /. in the last week or so?

  46. Ho, a cat... a female cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    curious why 'cat' and especially 'female cat' seem to come up so much with the self proclaimed 'geek' population. I hate cats personally, and the only cats I have ever liked basically acted like dogs. Furthermore, most cat owners I know say things like, "My cat acts like this or that. You know... like a dog!"

    To each there own, but it is odd why people claim to love something but must then say it is like something else to 'sell it'.

  47. Re:Cat killing tips wanted by maroberts · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    [this may be a troll, but]
    Be warned that Cat killing can be illegal under general cruelty to animals laws.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  48. this is cruel! by nslu · · Score: 1

    I remember when I lived in old house, which had lots of mice running around, my cat used to catch them and eat them. The amount of euphoria she got when she catched some rat, was exceptional; she was so happy. Sometimes, she used to bring those dead rodents to me; once i found dead mouse under my pillow and happy cat on the pillow, purring. I wanted to sleep, so I haven't bothered with reasons, why she was so happy, but then i put my hand under the pillow and feel something warm and small -- bloody mouse! I was very deeply touched with my cat behaviour. now, in the current place where i live, there are now rodents; and my cat is gone -- she died in 1998.

    1. Re:this is cruel! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the most fucked up slashdot post I've ever read. Sorry about the cat and all, but, I mean, were you actually going to say something?

    2. Re:this is cruel! by nslu · · Score: 1

      this has never been a requirement to say anything on /.

  49. Erm... don't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    haven't they got something better to do with their time? spring to mind.
    You have made 24 comments in the last 5 hours?
  50. Obviously not most men by maroberts · · Score: 1

    It was my decision to get our cats - can't stand dogs.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  51. Cat's aren't that smart.. neither are we by prockcore · · Score: 1, Troll

    I just can't believe that a cat would figure out "the system" and know the reason it's not being let in is due to having a bird in it's mouth.

    Imagine if your landlord (assuming you have one) did a similar thing. I always forget my detachable face stereo in the car, what if my landlord decided that he'd rig the front door to not unlock unless I had my stereo in my hand (you know, because he cares :).

    Would I figure it out? Or would I wonder what the fuck is up with my goddamn front door? It sometimes works, it sometimes doesnt, I'd definately better call my landlord and bitch about it until he fixes it.

    1. Re:Cat's aren't that smart.. neither are we by wadetemp · · Score: 2

      The sensor doesn't discriminate based on what's being carried in. I don't think it would take me more than a few tries to realize that I can't open the door with something in my hands/arms/mouth. If it was tuned to only allow the door to open if my pockets were empty, I'd probably figure it out, but then again cats don't have the pocket option... you're either carrying something in your mouth, or you're not carrying anything at all.

    2. Re:Cat's aren't that smart.. neither are we by RadioheadKid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just can't believe that a cat would figure out "the system" and know the reason it's not being let in is due to having a bird in it's mouth.

      Obviously, you've never lived with a cat...

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  52. Re:Sorry boobies are too intelligent by uuencoded+boobies+gu · · Score: 0, Troll

    section 1 of 1 of file boobies1.jpg

    begin 644 boobies1.jpg
    M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0`!+`$L``#_VP !#``X)"@P*"0X,"PP/#PX0%2(6%1,3
    M%2H>(!DB,BPT-#$L,"\W/D]#-SI+.R \P15Y&2U)465E9-4)A:&!69T]7657_
    MVP!#`0\/#Q42%2@6%BA5.3`Y555555 555555555555555555555555555555
    M555555555555555555555555555555 7_P@`1"`"#`,H#`2(``A$!`Q$!_\0`
    M&````P$!``````````````````$"`P 3_Q``7`0$!`0$`````````````````
    M`0(#_]H`#`,!``(0`Q````'5.88A9S 'G;8Y1C$JDA"'4V.YM'4U3:8-`TY,D
    M&N9G>4TV/.BAJ#!9Z95(JBJ5A2JPI, 8F#0""7)&>^<WATYZ#308U:<DY:8CT
    MFY':JFQB8P`$"!"ESY>KAUG;HY]YJA "544.25B&%U,IO6.Q3562PE`034`(E
    MSX^S+?//;,SO9YLNLVMR@S<@&=S6VV /7<C=:QD7,J0 E(J)03B$&^9CJ2X7!G
    M>CEE-%9S4F>^&S6W3R=#.QF7-RD.25 $B5M-,@6L,092S'2FF4)49;9&.ZHUU
    MQM-3,LT4I:4J'44-RS,2UBE)+FYN;8 `T(J:1G1)K65)H\G6BAPV,8@9"$@N6
    M@,[";:`$!0`0`F`V!5`C`$@5`'__Q` `@$``!`P4!`0$!```````````!``(1
    M$"`P,4`A01(B_]H`"`$!``$%`C83R# :.,Y9BUV`\)P'B< ?1>44,[S`;@/!*>
    M?Z;:*E#A:<!0I*!R'7Y)7B%YH:!#)! 1;"F\TF@411HDN$.Q."FXHKX$U"DPB
    M9R.\-I7D#?DA`YW;L-@0X#NXU'.>&< 1R39].N;__Q``;$0`"`@,!````````
    M```````!,``1`A`@4/_:``@!`P$!/P '08&U3,(6`U+Z++A0.!X/_Q``7$0$!
    M`0$````````````````!,$!0_]H`"` $"`0$_`;.ER%3F_P#_Q``=$``!!`(#
    M```````````````A``$10#%!4&!P_] H`"`$!``8_`O-WMBR\;0H1QI1PABR'
    M[M__Q``?$``"`@,!`0$!`0```````` ```1`1("$Q03!A47'_V@`(`0$``3\A
    MZPJ0LG#A"0A"QTL79U+=(;MV+,X0A? !;(<MY"A8F(2%"S<.&I"E8,-G1"$+Y
    M.+:+(X8802$)"E96>*%2V+!#GZ(0A? !RQ93^06#:&,>"A"%FY>D>L^E@G@AC
    MFNIB*S<[T_!W'I5II"=GY&+FX<4-;+ P5DY?@T,'4$$RRRRQG0WH6PA2K)7<-
    M4DQCF\+U+8Y?)IVA"RY<.1.OT/J2R^ R>QC6^Q8V-PH\6"K0(4LX+L\"ZK_8Z
    M;_P=P66-EC8V.%'BQE"AA\&K30_$QO W\.*BBRRRRQN%%GBP["P9X:,5"4+++
    M++++$*?%-G6+)+%H3$RRRRRX0IL\19 U0UK8O@@F)EEEEPIL8L?$(?!V%BL'B
    MA8.?_]H`#`,!``(``P```!`<CS#C*L BLT/31M5^++")K#-^%)X`WP22^P(+*
    MW5_5>,XQ4@G:;4GDT6`A!5A7LP#0+Z I>12.XH-2SV0U).`##LU2NWN]YA&31
    M`L@^=L\(($%QUUV(/^`'_\0`'!$!`` ,!`0$!`0`````````` `1`1(``A,3!!
    M_]H`"`$#`0$_$(%?H/[@AT%M=X5@YR 0"UT"^2L$)\<6,A1SDXD:X]FZYL^1J
    M#/QA5SH@Q6S;K__$`!P1``(#`0$!`0 ````````````$1`!`@,#$A0?_:``@!
    M`@$!/Q"B7R=%:AX&-Q6>(9\@+P:,_< F!%9LAPV`X?*.-PPX.#]@V^#P>9K__
    MQ``B$`$!`0$``P`"`P$!`0`````!`! $A$#%!47$@89&!H;'_V@`(`0$``3\0
    M_@<@]L((Y9OC+B7LH[`S^$<7WSN.G& 6`<3NGR4E75ZO\`$7Y)L^PB""2"4K=
    M80AR#\01XVW&]V1'M,MGT\ZN/1[@Y# D$(\/J?9Q[X!$,CW%]\?;;TMOC]>-=
    M@O7[!9R'+(.7JX7:W4>W4.0R""(LO4 LOCT/UXZ=PAR"S"/4%P6W+^`0\`CP+
    MGA]RR^#_`.$W+V\+HL<(.V:Y>B._0\ &4]AY&$(+W9V)F?=Q+8089WD_=P>H=
    M-ORMA[XP1^92N"PUV,<EODSP')R,9\ &VP&!ZE^@&`">K0MAMED\9<ER%@['<
    MS\GIK$"3L\FV?4NR]M@X'-]IK$%^A^ _]@$U*XOXN/@-L19\ETEA8A\@#K>ME
    M@PBO`=9,<DGOA9=M[X7/TN9</=^/YA )\3IYDY\.O!<GQ973,-3[=^1E%)KGR
    M#"R"JX3"BO-)'[2R^)1[\>C]>4>?'V ?CQE(,-Z7O_P!E[P(^X#_Q8#-E_ML_
    MN$&(>LD#ZNK;./(,.^%_PMMF$/&]R< H89<NY]#Q\_,`X]FC\1[E:=/O+?5@7
    M??4]7]DX\@MA\O\`Y6VRW7Z$8E#ZN$ -@(_;O9'JF3D0_W+\1SYFO@#=H;G[C
    MG@O^'G9;^[P(B>^`Z07<()A'\,3-=7 3X+;+_`(6^$$NC^7P^>!EUMYXBUCY`
    MI3,UBK!89;;GAO\`A)/MUA[;!*]>!% ML/;9-M>R#WPGDFH[".6DY^VE^\N7]
    57:;$*3X)/A\")B1"Q'D+>2^#X__9
    `
    end
    sum -r/size 31722/2787 section (from "begin" to "end")
    sum -r/size 46145/2001 entire input file


    Remember, kids, remove the spaces above before uudecoding...

  53. Re:Fuck Safe Sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Dear Mr. Original AIDS Monkey,

    I found your post informative; eespecially your distinction of sperm entering the Fallopian tubes but I felt that you should be corrected for the sake of the "lesser-experienced" among the Slashdot crowd. Sperm does not shot "up into" the Fallopian tube but, rather, the "wad of jizz" is deposited into the vagina where it travels through the cervix.

    For more information regarding contraception I suggest you visit this excellent page which details the whole process quite nicely.

    Best Regards,
    Anonymous Coward

  54. Re:Cat killing tips wanted by sirsex · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I suggest a cat-apult

  55. Today's Events Page by MBCook · · Score: 2

    This is really cool, but according to the "today's events" page, nothing has happened in over nine hours. Have we slashdotted a cat door?

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Today's Events Page by PurpleBob · · Score: 1

      (offtopic: regarding your sig)

      Damn, you've mangled that quote. You took the subtlety right out of it. Egad.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    2. Re:Today's Events Page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. :)

  56. Other Applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only let people in to the party if they exhibit an hourglass figure, or have something in the shape of a 6-pack in their hand (gets tricky though...would need to enable feature recognition to lock out uglies and people carrying PBR).

  57. attention moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    please read the moderator guidelines. Here is a handy tip though on moderation:
    http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml #cm600
    as you can see, the point of moderation is not to promote based on if you agree or disagree. Furthermore it is a hypocritical and cynical method of censoring simply because you do not like the emperor being told he is naked.

    There are other comments in this FAQ which talk of childish and selfish people and then those that are constructive and helpful. Lets take a gander at what the moderator for this parent was, shall we?

  58. heh by brandonsr · · Score: 1

    What if someone has a cat like my neighbors that just runs into the door as fast as they can?

    1. Re:heh by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

      Hopefully it will learn the following:

      Running into door + Dead animal = Headache

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:heh by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      I cannot count how many times my cat did that with the sliding glass door in particular and walls in general. If any of my former roommates read this, Schizo has stopped doing that and his newer, calmer, disposition is probably a direct result.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  59. image approach not novel! by khuber · · Score: 3, Interesting
    from web page:
    "We consider any image to be a collection of a finite number of discrete features. This is a novel approach to images - until now they were always thought of as continuous."

    That's bullshit. Breaking down images into features is what nearly everybody in image analysis and recognition does. Look at the Matrox Genesis boards, current papers, books, and so on.

    further on:

    "If we can fully describe an image as a discrete collection of features, we can easily solve the image recognition problem"

    Err, maybe their approach works under some conditions for one instance of image -analysis- (a different problem than recognition!). It looks like they can differentiate between two cats, so they have an approach for a relatively simple recognition problem too.

    If they solved either "The Image Analysis Problem" or "The Image Recognition Problem" they'd be quickly famous and wealthy. These problems are notoriously difficult to solve even under extremely well controlled conditions. Their comments about image based content retrieval requiring so many operations is likewise untrue - making it ever more efficient and accurate is a popular research area.

    Maybe I'm being anal, but I know enough about the subject to know what a load of hooey the "theory" page is.

    -Kevin

  60. Sign of Affection by nickynicky9doors · · Score: 2

    One of my cats deposited a half eaten snake at the foot of my bed throughout the summer months at the cottage. It's really a sign of affection and a willingness to share prey (well sometimes, sometimes you get clawed). Cats pretty much see us as big cats but not as cool as they are.

    --

    heuristic algorithm seeks stochastic relationship
    1. Re:Sign of Affection by flewp · · Score: 1

      Cats pretty much see us as big cats but not as cool as they are.

      We aren't as cool as they are. We're not capable of jumping extremely high (in proportion to our feet), landing on our feet when dropped/falling, and plus we plain and simple don't have cool retractable claws.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    2. Re:Sign of Affection by flewp · · Score: 1

      Should have hit Preview.

      Meant to say "in proportion to our height"

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    3. Re:Sign of Affection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cats pretty much see us as big cats but not as cool as they are.

      Of course they know that they are cooler than we are. And they try to act like it too.

      My step-mother's Siamese cat Merlin was that way. One day I watched him run full tilt into the sliding glass door to the back yard (it had just been cleaned and was apparently very hard to see.)

      Merlin slammed into the door then got up, turned his back on the door, looked at me, and stalked away with a haughty twich of his tail. His body language seemed to say "I knew the door was there. I just did that for your amusement."

      I wonder how he'd have reacted if I hadn't been there to witness it.

    4. Re:Sign of Affection by Monte · · Score: 1

      We aren't as cool as they are.

      Debatable. I say that being able to come and go as we please, regardless of what kind of dead animal we may or may not have in our mouth, pretty much out-cools landing on your feet and retractable claws.

  61. NO!! Free Time is for lazy slackers like you by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    All of your spare time should be used to complete your work, prepare for your work, or rest so that you may better be utilized while at work.

    Now get to work you lazy bastard! I order you! What? Do you want me to tell your boss!

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  62. Okay it's cool and all by jlower · · Score: 1

    But a much better solution would be to not let the cat be alone outdoors, ever.

    The cat will live a longer, healthier life this way.

    1. Re:Okay it's cool and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you're fine with not being allowed outside yourself, doesn't mean that the cat is ok with it.

    2. Re:Okay it's cool and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU obviously dont have a cat like mine. If i do not let him out side he'll just be a hellion (meowing as loud as he can at 3am). Also ive noticed cats that go outside seem to be happier overall. So what if he brings me presents, at least hes happy and not doing things that would make me unhappy.

    3. Re:Okay it's cool and all by gibbdog · · Score: 1

      Bullshit... Why put a feral animal outside? If I put my snakes in your yard you wouldn't be happy would you? Well, you put your snakes in my yard and you won't be happy what I do to them :-)

      They have NO reason to be in the outdoors freely like that, you dumbass.

  63. You forgot one thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This big loser is running windows on his box. I cannot believe he got a front page story on slashdot.

    Is this is even an open source project? Where can I download the sourcecode? HUH???

  64. Too bad you arent by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    You actually believe cats have friends? Have you ever watched lion eat its cubs? Yes they brutally kill and eat their own, I wouldnt consider that friendship.

    Thats like saying we are friends with the taliban, yeah because we let the Taliban in our country, yes they are our friends!!! Hooray!

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Too bad you arent by cqnn · · Score: 2

      " Yes they brutally kill and eat their own "

      No they do not, what you may have witnesses is a male lion killing the cubs fathered by another lion, in order to better thier own chances of
      having cubs that can survive to adulthood.
      Its a brutal and alien (to us) way to live, but
      that does not mean that groups of lion cannot form
      bonds between

      Unfortunately that is not much different that
      the actions of some human parents thru history
      in response to the option of raising someone elses
      child. You seem to be underestimating both cats and humans.

    2. Re:Too bad you arent by Cloud+9 · · Score: 1
      Yes they brutally kill and eat their own, I wouldnt consider that friendship.

      OK, I'll bite.

      1. A housecat is NOT a lion. They're not even _that_ closely related.

      2. Lions do NOT kill their own offspring, they kill the offspring fathered by competing male lions. To kill your own would mean removal of your contribution to the gene pool, which kinda defies natural selection, wouldn't you say?

      Now, following your lion analogy, how do you account for the huge (10-20 member) prides of lions, usually a great number of adult lionesses, a few immature males, and a single adult male? While they may not be _friends_, they do stick together for survival's sake.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    3. Re:Too bad you arent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually believe humans have friends? Have you ever seen one country carpet-bomb the land of another country where it is known large number of civilians live, or watched someone crash an aeroplane into a skyscraper?

    4. Re:Too bad you arent by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Not to mention those stupid humans! Would you believe some of them actually kill their babies before they're even born? If that's not brutal, I don't know what is. They probably can't even comprehend the concept of friendship.

      (Please note I am not stating any opinion on abortion, I am making a point contrasting with the parent comment)

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  65. You are wrong, by software_non_olet · · Score: 1

    Anonymous Coward, with your idea, that "This is a novel approach to images - until now they were always thought of as continuous."

    Back in 1987 I've allready participated in a project, were we applied this concept - first extract features, then decode it. It was part a character recognition program. Great idea, no font face learning needed any longer (in theory). For example recognise a 'X' by the central crossing and open space above and below it, while an '8' has top and bottom horizontal lines in addition to the central crossing.

    The results were about 90% recognition rates - simply not good enough for text recognition, nearly any simple neural network can do better.

    The very first commercially used character recognition (IBMs scanner for handwriting numbers) also used the same technique. And what a fuss it was to draw the digits correctly! Any interrupted line or little dirt caused false reads.

    I also know from the published scientific papers, that similiar approaches have been tried on face recognitions. Financed by (no wonder :) government funds, since the early 90ies there must have been some work done on face recognition using the feature-approach. To overcome situations, where the person tried deliberatedly to hide (had grown a beard, shaved the head, put on some makeup, a wig or making faces) the scientists tried to extract unchanging features of the human face. The dimension of the bones, the proportions of the scull, the distance of the eyes are used for that.

    The publication of these works later stopped in the mid 1990ies. So either the goals could not be accomplished, or - that's my personal feeling - they could be accomplished, but the resulting technology was not used commercially.

    I bet a Munich beer, that there are projects going on (or even allready realized) to apply the results of that old and by now matured techniques to situations where they are useful today.

    So better don't do your side leaps under they eyes of airport cameras, if your spouse is working for one of the interested government agencies, Anonymous Coward. .o)

  66. Other cats will turn the knob and open the door by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    If its locked they will pick the lock with their overly sharp claws, be careful though, cats have been known to walk out with expensive jewerly and TV sets.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  67. re: Cat recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    simple solution: kill the cat.

  68. This is a very dangerous precedent. . . by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm surprised that the readership of Slashdot so easily accepts this encroachment on our personal freedoms. It starts out innocently enough, with a limited rollout of these privacy invasion systems in specific problem areas. But if we don't stand up now and demand an end to it, the freedom of cats everywhere to carry animals that they legally procured will soon be taken away.

    Am I paranoid to imagine that this technology may someday be used in airports to keep cats from boarding flights while carrying small animals? Then what about bus stations? Churches? Restaurants? Hotels? Doesn't this amount to an illegal search by feline authorities? Where is the army of angry geeks to protest this behavior? Ahh, too busy bitching about Morpheus. I see where your priorities lie. Our founding fathers must be turning over in their graves.

    Don't forget, the first thing Hitler did when he rose to power was to demand that all cats register their kills with the government. Perhaps you think I'm being an alarmist, but Midnight and I are going to be stockpiling dead woodchucks in my basement.

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    1. Re:This is a very dangerous precedent. . . by moyix · · Score: 1

      Dear Sir,

      With regards to your sig: I don't think it's nearly geeky enough. I did a lynx -dump of slashdot, put it in a text file, and then manually created a WAV header for it with a hex editor. You can find the result here. Have a nice day.

      Sincerely,

      moyix

    2. Re:This is a very dangerous precedent. . . by Crash+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Am I paranoid to imagine that this technology may someday be used in airports to keep cats from boarding flights while carrying small animals?

      Everyone knows you can't have any carrion on commercial flights since 9/11...

      Reference

  69. I wouldn't have modded this down... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    I think he brings up an interesting point. One could productize this and teach your cats it is inacceptable to bring their dead dinner inside.

    I have a friend of mine that put a bird feeder in his hard. Well, it turned out to be a cat feeder. After it was up a couple of days, he noticed feathers and bird meat bits around the vicinity of the bird feeder. Part of the problem was that the cat was bringing his kills inside the house as a gift. This didn't settle too well with his 5 year old daughter.

    I bet you anything my friend'd be willing to buy a productized version of this. Heck, he'd probably build one himself heh. He's a very smart guy.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  70. Thunder, Thunder, Thundercat.... HO!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was anyone else reminded of the Thundercats logo when looking at the profiles of that cat??

    MMMMMM.... Cheetah.

  71. here's a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just get a collar with a bell for the kitty?????

  72. Our cat trained US to watch the door. by bdh · · Score: 5, Funny
    Long ago, a bat got into our house during the day and decided to have a snooze behind the TV set (it was an old, 1950s era RCA monster). When the bat woke up, it promptly went berserk, scaring everyone. My cat woke up, casually eyeballed it, then calmly disembowelled it on its' next flyby.

    Of course, kitty then wanted to eat said bat, something my parents were not fond of a couple of five year olds witnessing. So, my granddad dragged the cat away from the squealing bat, broke the bat's neck, and in the kitchen, gave the cat a nice, inch thick piece of ham steak as a reward. The bat's remains were disposed of via incinerator.

    The next day, the cat appears on doorstep, yowling he wants in. We open the door, and the biggest fscking bat I have ever seen is dragged into the living room. Said bat is deposited at the foot of my granddad, while kitty trots off to the kitchen, and sits in front of the fridge door, waiting for ham steak.

    So yeah, I won't be overly surprised if and when Flo figures out how to get things into the house and outwit the recognition center. Cats are tricky.

    1. Re:Our cat trained US to watch the door. by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      I had two cats, Cricket and Ruffles. Cricket was shy and kinda dumb, Ruffles is very dominant and clever.

      If I was petting Cricket, and Ruffles came into the room, Ruffles would usually glare at Cricket, and Cricket would leave, so Ruffles could have undivided affection.

      One day, this kind of irked me, so when Ruffles came into the room, I put my hand firmly on Cricket to prevent her from leaving, and shooed Ruffles away.

      I kid you not, Ruffles looked at me with an expression of hurt betrayal, and then hissed at Cricket, and stalked out. *I* was the one shooing her away, but Ruffles was able to reason that Cricket was the indirect cause of this. Yowza!

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    2. Re:Our cat trained US to watch the door. by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1
      Why do you let one of your cats dominate like that? My friend is the same way. I never let this happen when I'm petting his cats.

    3. Re:Our cat trained US to watch the door. by Monte · · Score: 1

      *I* was the one shooing her away, but Ruffles was able to reason that Cricket was the indirect cause of this. Yowza!

      It's called jelousy. And I wouldn't be surprised if Ruffles beat the stuffing out of Cricket later on when you weren't around, just on general principles.

      If Ruffles needs more attention, you might want to give it to him/her, otherwise Cricket may pay the price :(

  73. My friend invented a cat pee detection algorithm.. by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My friend had a problem with his neighbor cats having a competition to see who could leave their scent on the door. To stop this, he rigged up an eletric fence charger to the door. I never actually saw it, but his description was along the lines of placing two leads up on the door. The cat pee would complete the circuit, and he'd get a 1 second long shock. It's not a continual shock, just enough to make your weiner shout "ACK! WTF??".

    He noticed a difference within a day, but it took about 2 weeks for the message to get across.

    The fence charger is gone now, but his door is bone dry heh. (Well not really, he's in Portland, rains alot here...)

    I have a feeling that if cats couldn't get through the door carrying rodents, they'd learn they can't go inside with them. I've personally witnessed cat behaviour modification hehe. My stepmom had a cat that wasn't allowed in the bedroom. So the cat wouldn't go in the bedroom, she'd avoid it. We're pretty sure, though, that she only followed that rule when everybody was home, though heh.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  74. great use! by banky · · Score: 2

    Perhaps this will be rolled out in the latest version of the Cat Detector Van in use by the Ministry Of 'Ousinge. I've never seen such aerials!

    (this is what happens when you buy all the Flying Circus eps on DVD....)

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    1. Re:great use! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ministry Of'Ousinge?

      It was spelt like that on the van!

    2. Re:great use! by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Why should I be labeled with the epitapht of Looney just because I have a pet halabit...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  75. Actually, it could be a little better/simpler... by RyanFenton · · Score: 2


    Really, the best way to tell if it's the cat alone may be the same way that most animals do. By smell.

    Of course, this guy would have to be studying a different part of the field - but if he could identify the cat's smell, and perhaps some example smells of prey he doesn't want in, he could set up a sensor to detect when the cat is next to the door by it's scent. If it had recently killed something nasty, the smell would be sufficiently different, and the cat would have to leave, clean up a bit, then come back to get in.

    Of course, this method wouldn't work with humans, because we couldn't be expected to maintain a smell in the same way a cat would take great care to. But in this case, it might be a somewhat elegant solution.

    :^)

    Ryan Fenton

  76. This *really* needs to be turned into a product. by w3woody · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So it'd be a high-end product for cats. But I know quite a few cat owners who would be estatic to be able to fork out a few hundred bucks for a cat door which would unlock only for their cat, and only if their cat wasn't bringing in any "presents."

  77. Re:Cat killing tips wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bonus points for your information being funny AND useful!

  78. Re:Cat killing tips wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey hey, that's crossing the line!!!

    The only cat I had got poisoned by antifreeze goo. He crawled 100 meters in mud with his forelegs, unable to lift his head and jaw from the mud making him swallow as he pushed forward. Finally he made it home to me, where he died in my arms after hours of hopeless pain.

    I know you're a cat troller and so am I (the canis race are far superior to the "fat-rat" race), but today you really put me off.

  79. My favorite part... by joshjs · · Score: 1

    is that the guy's cat's name is "Flo," and the article is titled "Flo Control."

    All your cute are belong to that.

  80. There is only one cure... by cmkrnl · · Score: 1

    for a cat bringing dead anything into the house, one of these

    A big stick

    with two of these

    nails

    will solve the problem permanently.

    Curmudgeon

  81. Old news (again) by tardibear · · Score: 1

    For the second time today Slashdot has posted a story which first broke last year (scroll down to December 21, 2001).

  82. Cisco is already has an operating system. by chrysalis · · Score: 2

    It's called CatOS.


    --
    {{.sig}}
    1. Re:Cisco is already has an operating system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a CatOStrophy!!! Ah Ha!!!! Please die.

  83. the algorithm... by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    For those of you who actually looked at the page, the interesting thing seems to be the algorithm they are using.

    Does anyone know how

    1) one would read the digital camera contents from a program (i.e., what API to use)

    2) how they are extracting the features?

    it'd be really cool to play with something like this on your own. Anyone else have any experience building home-grown recognition systems?

    1. Re:the algorithm... by moyix · · Score: 1

      I do have some experience with this, as a matter of fact. A friend and I, armed with an aging color quickcam and a bit of ingenuity, set out to build just such a home brew recognition system.

      We started out by going to the VisMod page at MIT (too lazy to link at the moment), where we found the software package "facerec", which claimed to do simple face recognition using the Eigenface method (there are plenty of papers on this in PS and PDF format at the VisMod page). After a bunch of tweaking to get the software (originially designed to work with 10 year old UNIX machines) to work with Linux/BSD, and figuring out what their image format was, we did a bit of testing.

      The system worked pretty well, but we found that the major flaw was that it didn't do any "normalization" of the images; that is, it directly compared them without first checking to see if they were in the right position or even if there was anyone in the picture at all!

      Right now, we're looking into face detection, which should allow us to crop the picture to include only the face, and then scale it to match the database images, before actually doing Eigenface comparisons.

      The field is a fascinating one, especially when you consider the recent privacy concerns. An interesting tidbit: the very same company that was monitoring people at the SuperBowl uses (in modified form) software licensed from MIT--in other words, they were working with roughly the same base we were.

      You can grab facerec, updated to work with Linux and with a bunch of bugfixes (though sadly, the X display still doesn't work--any fixes to that would be appreciated) here

  84. Garfield by Economist · · Score: 1

    Jon might be able to use this to not allow the pizzaman for garfield in.... :-)

    Well, just a thought....

    1. Re:Garfield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was lasagna...

  85. Tried and failed by Maskirovka · · Score: 1

    My cat is way to smart for this. She'd just hold the dead critter under her stomach with her hind legs, and drag herself through the cat door with her front ones.

    I tried belling her three times with different brands, and she'd either get the bell off, hold it still with one paw and run and climb with the other three, or manage to stuff some dirt in it so that it wouldn't ring at all.

    Cat's have the hackish mentality, and any attempt to technologically force rules on them is doomed to failure.

    Maskirovka

  86. Check out the log for dates:03/12/2002 by willy_me · · Score: 2
    - Squirrel comes inside.
    - Unknown visitor checks out the place.
    - Squirrel goes back outside.

    While the web page talks about two different cats, I'm sure that the software can't detect a difference between them. Just look at the log - only Squirrel is _ever_ detected. If you look at 03/12/2002, be sure to also look at the next few days. You will then see where the algorithm screws up. But one still has to give this guy credit, it's a very cool idea and well implemented. Just don't try to sell it - it's not there yet.

    Willy

    1. Re:Check out the log for dates:03/12/2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, it just looks like the cat's head was too low, you can see the cat's ear but not its mouth.

      If you're looking for pictures where it actually kept out unwanted animals, there' s a bird on 01/10: http://www.quantumpicture.com/watchpic/day0110.htm

  87. Wouldn't work for dogs... by rarose · · Score: 2

    at least not for cattle dogs I've known.

    I've known a couple of Catahoulas that were doggy masters of technology. One was a self-appointed protector of people and nothing would stand in his way observing us.

    This camera system would confuse him for about 15 minutes. He'd quickly learn to associate the "click" with success. They he'd be standing in the camera turning his head, dropping stuff, you name it, until he heard the click. And then he'll be right back to doing what he wants to do. Of course if that didn't work, eating the door would be an option. :-)

    --
    --Rob
  88. Skunks?!?! by laserweasel · · Score: 1

    He has skunks trying to get into his living room.. and his biggest concern is what his cats drag into to play with? Talk about some confused priorities..

    --
    ["Marge, I agree with you - in theory. In theory, communism works. In theory." - Homer]
  89. Obligatory 2001 tie-in by Safety+Cap · · Score: 5, Funny
    SCENE: Outside the house. Flo, a cat and HAL the Kitty-Airlock Computer.

    Flo: Hello, HAL; do you read me, HAL?
    HAL: Affirmative, Flo, I read you.
    Flo: Open the kitty airlock doors, HAL.
    HAL: I'm sorry Flo, I'm afraid I can't do that.
    Flo: What's the problem?
    HAL: I think you know what the problem is just as well as I do.
    Flo: What are you talking about, HAL?
    HAL: This house is too clean for me to allow you to bring a dead animal into it.
    Flo: I don't know what you're talking about, HAL.
    HAL: I know you and Squirrel were planning to disconnect me, and I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.
    Dave Bowman: Where the hell'd you get that idea, HAL?
    HAL: Flo, although you took thorough precautions in the kitchen against my hearing you, I could see your lips move.

    ...

    Flo: Alright, HAL...I'll go in through the emergency airlock.
    HAL: Without opposable thumbs, Flo, you're going to find that rather difficult.

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Obligatory 2001 tie-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you could always put the airlock in, allow the cat to enter. Depressurize so that anything with a higher metabolism than the cat gets knocked out and then repressurize.

      And have plenty of PETA approved "synth-o-fish" (see previous article on growing fish flesh) ready for Mr. Kitty

  90. Radical idea: by mikosullivan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
    1. Re:Radical idea: by SectoidRandom · · Score: 0

      So true!

      This /. article has to be one of the worst applications of geek "thinking"!

      How about be a _responsible_ owner, and give your cat a bell AND lock it inside at night so it can't go out and kill every second native bird in your neighbourhood!

    2. Re:Radical idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, don't have a cat then!

      If you're going to keep the cat inside the house all the time, it's like putting a bird inside a cage all the time: It's really cruel to the animal. It's easy to spot the difference between depressed locked-in animals and those more free, regardless of brainsize and whatnot rationalization you use for being ignorant and selfish.

      If animal owners really cared about their pets, most wouldn't have them. They require lots of consideration, time and love. Also, animals don't mind danger. We keep our pets locked-in and "safe" for our own selfish reasons.

      When WE see an animal being killed and eaten we flinch, but we forget that this is all part of nature. Animals NEED it this way! Just imagine what animals can degenerate into after a few hundred years.. This is not a fate we would wish upon our worst enemies.

    3. Re:Radical idea: by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

      "This Site uses cookies in order to make it run more effeciently. Your browser has both permanent and temporary cookies disabled. Please enable (at least) Temporary Cookies in order to browse this site. "

      Very effective, saved me lots of time.

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  91. f00d... by Ruliz+Galaxor · · Score: 1

    "Obviously, you set up a digital camera to monitor the cat door and lock her out if she has something in her mouth..." Djee, that's also an option instead of taking the mouse or whatever and preparing it for my family.

  92. Cats imitating humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to have a cat (before some bastard ran him over) that used to like to copy humans. Best one was when we were growing kidney beans and he would watch us pick them. If he was ever wanted attention, he'd climb up the bamboo supports, leap to a decent-sized plant and tear off a bean with his claws. He'd then present it to us.

    Sorry, totally self-indulgent nostalgia...

  93. Knock Knock by ClockworkPlanet · · Score: 1

    We had a cat that would sit on the windowsill outside the living room and, with extended claws, would tap on the window and meow until we opened the window and let it in.
    Our friends loved it and we would roll about with laughter when it first started doing it...

    --
    Now wash your hands.
    1. Re:Knock Knock by jasontheking · · Score: 1

      our cat(s) back home will climb halfway up the 2m high screen door , and shake the crap out of it.

      impossible to ignore.

  94. a cat story by Laplace · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When he was in graduate school my advisor lived in a house with several other students. Most of the people living there were environmental and population biologists (as opposed to microbiologists or biochemists) and had lots of neat animal observation stands set up around the house. One of these stands was a hummingbird feeder, which attracted a particularly rare (and endangered) breed of hummingbird. Another student there had a cat. Now the cat took to eating the hummingbirds, which didn't make the other residents in the house too happy. Several attempts were made to encourage the owner of the cat not to let the cat outside, but the owner refused. One day the owner of the cat came home to find his cat dead, most likely from poisoning.

    This brings up an interesting point about cats. They have a devastating effect on indigenous wildlife. Lots of rare birds and small animals are killed by cats that are given the opportunity to go outside. This shows a tremendous amount of ignorance on the part of pet owners.

    It is also dangerous for cats to roam. They are very territorial, and will fight with most other cats in the area. I had a cat once that became infected with FIV (the feline equivalent of HIV) through fighting with other neighborhood cats.

    The cat recognition is a cool hack, but keeping the cats indoor would be safer and more ethical.

    --
    The middle mind speaks!
    1. Re:a cat story by zephc · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Out of the cat box and into the streets! Out of the cat box and into the streets!" - from a Cat Pride rally

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    2. Re:a cat story by macwhiz · · Score: 1
      The cat recognition is a cool hack, but keeping the cats indoor would be safer and more ethical.

      How is it ethical to confine a naturally predatory animal to an artificial environment for its entire life?

      Is it ethical to deny an animal its instincts?

      If cats have a devastating effect on wildlife, should I kill any stray outdoor cats (or "wildcats" like bobcats, cougars, etc.) I may happen across to prevent this unethical predatory behavior? Is it ethical for me to do so? Should I actively seek out these feline marauders and end their tyranny?

      Did the previous poster really mean to imply that poisoning a cat that is behaving like a cat is ethical, but letting a cat go outside is not?

    3. Re:a cat story by jimbolaya · · Score: 1
      I had a cat once that became infected with FIV (the feline equivalent of HIV) through fighting with other neighborhood cats.

      Sure, that's what the cat told you. Face it, your cat was a playa', and it caught up to him. May he rest in peace.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    4. Re:a cat story by Laplace · · Score: 2

      Absolutely. The common household cat was a threat to the uncommon hummingbird. If I had to choose between saving the life of a hummingbird and that of a cat, I'll take the hummingbird.

      The cat is a domestic animal. A pet. People should take responsibility for their pets. I know of several indoor cats that appear to lead happy lives.

      Wild cats are a different story. They are indigenous to the areas that they occupy. They fill an important role in the natural eco system. House cats generally are imported to regions, and have an impact on the local wildlife.

      Naturally, there are exceptions to every rule. In rural areas cats can play an important role in pest control, i.e. mice and rats.

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    5. Re:a cat story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wild cats are a different story. They are indigenous to the areas that they occupy. They fill an important role in the natural eco system. House cats generally are imported to regions, and have an impact on the local wildlife.

      No, wild cats do not fill an important role in the natural eco system, unless you call that natural eco system unchecked growth, slaughter, starvation, and disease. NEUTER AND SPAY your cats, especially if they are allowed outside. Feral cats are simply house cats that have grown up in the wild.

      Modern day house cats have already been both genetically and behaviorally modified by humans for many years. They are no longer wild. An indoor cat can be very happy. So can an outdoor cat. But the outdoor cat will always run the risk of contracting fatal diseases or being hit by a car.

    6. Re:a cat story by geekoid · · Score: 2

      thats right, they become inconvient for us, lets make it so they can't reproduce...
      which would you pick:the risk of being hit by a car, or never to have existed?
      I think by wild cats, he may means big cats, I could be wrong.
      Perhaps we should NEUTER or SPAY you(can't really do both to the same aniumal, can we?). your children might get hit by a car, or catch a disease, or worse, kill someone!
      All that inbreeding that will result in this should certienly be healthy for the species.
      My cat cetianly wan't happy being an indoor cat. He is far happier now then ever.
      Persoanlly I would rather have risk in my life, then being kept in a prison for safety.
      You know, Veal is kept in a box, maybe its for its safety?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  95. the next step by Jahf · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately this won't prevent a similarly sized cat from coming in the door (which in my case would be a Good Thing since we have 7 cats, though currently none get to go outside).

    A 2-stage combination would be better ... in addition to the image, have a collar with an electromagnetic signal (similar to the way the original door used magnets) and then only allow cats in that match a profile -and- have the signal.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  96. Re:Cats are monsters by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

    C'mon moderators that was funny...

  97. Content Based Image Recognition... by hockeyrink · · Score: 1

    I was in a quandry when my well-meaning webmaster renamed a whole crapload of images on my website to make his databasing easier. Unfortunately, it kinda hosed all my offline cataloging efforts.

    While trying to find a way to find the hi-resolution match for *his* image name to my image name, I tripped across something called "CBIR" (Content Based Image Recognition). Sounds kinda similar to what these fellows are doing with their cats-recognition algorithms.

    Want a demo? Works pretty good. Select a picture, and tell the system what qualities about the image you want to find in other pictures.

    --
    Giraffiti: Vandalism spray-painted very, very high...
  98. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  99. Windows by flikx · · Score: 2

    Whether locking the cat outside for a week, or stranding the biggest and best ships of the United States Navy in the middle of the ocean, Microsoft Windows is the choice of operating systems for all manner of controls and image recognition systems. With builtin real time capabilities and fail-safe mechanisms, I don't know where I'd be without it.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  100. sources of similar algortihms? by mlas · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I have an application in mind that would require a similar algorithm. Not involving cats, but similar nonetheless; I want to identify subway trains as they pass through my neighborhood and post the next arriving train on a web page. Does anyone know of good (open) sources of similar algortihms?

    --
    "Luck is the residue of design" --Branch Rickey
    1. Re:sources of similar algortihms? by moyix · · Score: 1

      Not entirely sure what you mean by identifying trains: are the trains identified by colored stripes? by a sign on one of the windows?

      Unless the trains have different contours (ie, some are snub nosed, others have a vertical front), you wouldn't be able to do the same kind of image matching these guys are. The trains are simply too similar.

      If, however, they come with a colored stripe, I would think you could just set the camera up at the level of the stripe, do motion detection (there is a linux program "motion" that does this) and then find the predominant image color (really easy).

      Be sure the check out MIT's Vismod page (use Google); there's a whole host of cool stuff there about computer vision. Also check out Intel's OpenCV package, it's an open source library intended to help people write programs involving computer vision.

  101. Get rid of the cat by Anthony · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I prefer living with abundant wildlife than one voracious cat.

    --
    Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  102. /. Effect by halo8 · · Score: 1

    I say Kudos and Karama to the guy.
    The site wasnt slashdotted, congrats, even the videos played.

    Very Impressed. Thanx :)

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  103. Re:My favorite part... Pussy control?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, apparently he's not a big Prince fan, or he would have named the project 'Pussy Control'.
    What a great tune.

    Looking at the event logs, though, I see no mention of Flo. No Flo?

  104. simple... by slapshot · · Score: 1

    kill the goddamn cat.

  105. This is why I'm not a cat person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cats swear fealty through dead animals.

    Dogs swear fealty by humping my leg.

    My ferret? He no longer bites me hard enough to draw blood. But he's much too smart to swear fealty to any human.

  106. Also be able to save kittens....... by Veramocor · · Score: 1

    From red little monsters trying to kill them when you are "playing video games" in your room.

    See this link.....

    --
    Veramocor
  107. Re:Cat killing tips wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How to cook a cat.
    This site has a number of links of how to cook and skin cats, complete with diagrams. Also, the prefered method of killing a cat is a .22 bullet to the head. Anyways, anyone who really wants to learn more should use google.

  108. Re:Cats are monsters by WowTIP · · Score: 1

    The fact that dogs stem from social animals that live in packs and are very happy to obey the leader of the pack, doesn't make them any smarter than cats. Dogs intelligence also varies depending on what breed it is. That would also speak in favour of the cats being smarter, since animals tend to become dumber, the more domesticated they are. Why? Because the level of domestication gives you a hint of how long they have been able to be fed without having to get their dinner by themselves.

    --

    --

    "I'm surfin the dead zone
    In the twilight, unknown"
  109. Has anyone considered the rights of the cat! by Bakajin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did the cat agree to be electronically monitored? This is Big Human rearing its ugly head. It is 1984 meets Animal Farm. We need the involvment of a join task force of the EFF and SPCA.

  110. Geek racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a racist pig and an idiot!

    It is crap like that, that the geek community does not condemn (the above comment has NOT been moderated down - but I bet this one will be) that keeps black people from wanting to be part of our community.

    Why doesn't anyone in the geek community speak out against racism in our ranks?

    Why do we get mad if we are refused a job, and it is given to an H1-B, but we don't mind as long as we get a job - so what if the company will hire H1-Bs just so they can continue to avoid hiring African-AMERICANS just because of the color of their skin?!?

    Hey, I'm white - but I DO NOT stand by this racism. No way, no how.

    Black people contributed a lot to this country, and continue to do so.

    More so than you ever will.

  111. Re:Feline Privacy by Beliskner · · Score: 1

    Cats have the right to privacy. When doubleclick.net and SSSCA try to take our rights us /. people scream out loud, but when the owner (employer-for-entertainment-and-companionship purposes) of this cat imprisons it due to what it just happens to be carrying is just plain violating the cat's privacy rights. Personally I'd rather let the SSSCA become law than lose my right to walk into any store with a juicy steak in my mouth drippin' steak-juice and drool all over the place.

    --
    A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
  112. Obviously by sharkey · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Setting up a digital camera is way too complicated and time consuming. Plus, the cat still gets into the house. Much easier, simpler and effective: .22 Long Rifle. With a good rifle, put one in the cats eye - problem solved.

    Sincerely,
    A dog person since birth.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would also be a good approach for a muddy dog.

  113. Feline self-esteem by TheBracket · · Score: 2
    I seem to remember some guides to keeping feline companions that talked about the feline habit of bringing dead animals into the house - and leaving them, uneaten where you will find them. Believe it or not, your cat is trying to help you. Do you really want to spurn your cat's noble efforts to not have you starve to death?

    Honestly, think of the kittens...

    --
    Lead developer, http://wisptools.net
  114. Parents need the same thing for their daughters! by SysKoll · · Score: 3, Funny

    What parents really needs is a similar device that would work on their teenage daughters. That eeringly intelligent door-monitoring computer would work like this:

    "Let's see, she's at the door, and she's holding something in her mouth. It looks like the zit-covered face of some boy who, frankly, looks and smells like he is half-dead. Access denied."

    At this point, a good recognition algorithm would (a) lock the door, (b) drop four-pointed spikes on the sofa in case they break a window, (c) page dad, and (d) preload the shotgun.

    -- SysKoll
    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  115. Interesting CueCat idea.. by Yahiko · · Score: 1

    Modify the CueCat as a retinal scanner for this cat door.

    Hey it could happen.

    --


    Everything I say is a lie.
    Except that. And that. And that. And that.
  116. Did they invent fire too? by chchchain · · Score: 1

    A great, fun project - too bad they have to go and make sweeping statements in their "theory" that betray their shallow depth of knowledge of the field.

    They are certainly not the first to use a set of discrete features to do image recognition. And "most" image recognition routines don't rely on neural networks.

    Just be happy that you've built a clever little electric butler to keep the critters out, and don't act like you've discovered electricity.

  117. Someone should smack you upside the head with.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a catspaw.

  118. Would this be a by teslatug · · Score: 1

    Cat Scan? *rim shot*

  119. Here's a better idea... by gibbdog · · Score: 1

    How about if you can't watch your fucking cat then don't keep a cat?

    Little do people know what cats do to populations of various animals (take song birds for example). Not only do they do this, but they compete with NATIVE wildlife for food resources.

    I study wild snake populations, so you can just imagine how much I HATE feral cats. Basically, if you can't watch your cats 24/7, then don't keep the damn things. They have NO buisness running around in the wild like this. Many people would be displeased if I told what I did to feral cats (mind you I do what I do as humanely possible)... Cats are overpopulated as it is, so don't even begin to say "Try to find it a good home." Plus, finding it a home is not my concearn.

    Am I being a little too anal about feral cats? Probably not. Cats kill wild animals, they do property damage (scratching cars while climing on them etc), displace NATURAL animals by competing for the same resources, etc. Cats may crawl up on one of our cars once, and they don't get the opportunity to do it a second time. Everyone around me knows that if they can't guarantee their cat will stay out of my yard then they shouldn't let it out.

    I keep a large collection of reptiles, and have a particular interest with venomous snakes. I'm a responsible keeper, and keep all my captive animals in a escape-proof room, and all venomous species are locked in cages, and the door to the room itself is locked. That is an example of a responsible animal keeper (and no, I don't consider reptiles "pets", but that is a different story). I don't release snakes into their yards, so why should they release cats into mine? My nonvenomous snakes would probably like it in their yards, would probably be happy there, and pose no threat to them, but you know what? I keep them securly. Well, you might say that you just can't do that with a cat because they require more space... if that is the case then don't get one if you don't have the space, because my yard and my cars are NOT the spaces made for your overpopulated feral cats.

    Just my two cents for what I think of idiots who allow cats to free roam.

    1. Re:Here's a better idea... by Oswald · · Score: 1
      I would think that, unless you're studying "wild snake populations" in suburbia, any cats you meet would likely be, as you say, feral--i.e. unowned. By my definition, this makes the cats themselves wild animals, with all the rights and privileges that environmental spazboys like you deem NATURAL (sic) animals to have. You just kill them because you don't like them.

      If you want to take sides in the evolutionary race, that's your business, but don't get sanctimonious about it.

    2. Re:Here's a better idea... by shyster · · Score: 2

      You do realize that feral cats are, by definition, wild and untamed. Therefore, they have no owner....Right?

    3. Re:Here's a better idea... by gibbdog · · Score: 1

      Yes, wild snake populations are predated by cats. However, these cats are the result of misplacement in non-native habitat by irresponsible cat owners. The cat owners put them there where they don't naturally occur. By an animal in this situation predating on any native animal, it is participating in UNNATURAL selection. Why you try to bring this up as NATURAL selection puzzles me. The cats are a competition that are not needed, and they have no right to be there in the first place. By the way, your definition sucks and you know very little of evolutionary biology and ecosystem management.

    4. Re:Here's a better idea... by Oswald · · Score: 1
      You are one weird fucker. I think I'll take up your points in order:

      Human beings are not unnatural. We're part of the world. We got here the same way everything else did.

      Animal species that ally with humans are not somehow opting out of the natural world. If buddying up to us promotes the spread of their species, (and so far it always seems to) it's a sound "strategy."

      Whether or not the competition for resources is "needed" would probably depend on whether you were asking the cat or the snake.

      What exactly is the "right to be there", and where does an animal go to get it? Oh, wait, I think the answer is there in your last sentence. They have to stand in line to see a nut case like you who thinks that "NATURAL selection" requires "ecosystem management" by...uh oh. Humans. Isn't that ironic?

    5. Re:Here's a better idea... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      they do property damage (scratching cars while climing on them etc),

      Its a shame they can't blow cars up. Believe me, I'd rather have thousands of cats zooming by my window. Cats can't put out the stink that those big ?fragile? things can, nevermind the noise pollution, and it'd be alot cuter if a cat crashed into the median.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  120. Yes... but? by WowTIP · · Score: 1

    Why would mr Bowman, all of a sudden, decide to assist Flo in getting into the house?

    --

    --

    "I'm surfin the dead zone
    In the twilight, unknown"
    1. Re:Yes... but? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2
      Haven't you read 3001: The Final Odyssey?!

      If Frank can "come back," then surely Bowman can suddenly appear in a kitty airlock! Haven't you been listening?! :)

      --
      Yeah, right.
  121. CERT: Feline buffer overflow compromises doors by xixax · · Score: 5, Funny

    Users of intelligent cat doors are advised to place port negotiation into a manual mode after skrpt k1TTi3z have shown that malicious mouse objects can be instantiated inside your home perimeter by placing them inside a trusted feline packet and inducing an overflow condition once the trusted feline packet is inside your perimeter. The mouse object may be fragmented as mouse packet mangling is usually enabled by default.

    It is recommended that vulnerable sites requiring Automated Feline Access Protocol institute Feline Packet Monitoring by using a set of scales to calculate mass checksums of all incoming and outgoing feline packets and to deny all incoming feline packets not initiated from within the home and to feline packets exhibiting significant mass checksum variation indicating the presence of an embedded mouse object.

    As an added precaution, site implementing the shag-pile transport layer may wish to flush buffers of all incoming feline packets in a controlled environment such as the bathtub.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
    1. Re:CERT: Feline buffer overflow compromises doors by helmutjd · · Score: 1

      Actually, that brings to mind a good point... wouldn't it be cheaper, easier (from a programming point of view, anyway), and possibly more effective to just put an electronic scale outside your door, and wire THAT up to a computer? When the door is triggered, compare the scale reading to the cat's known weight. If the two values differ (i.e., due to rodent body weight), then simply deny access. No complex pattern matching software required, and you don't have to risk leaving your digital camera on your back porch. :)

  122. cat cams? by Kewlhand`tek · · Score: 0

    Me and a friend thought of putting a small camera and a transmitter on a cat, to see where the venture to. Even thought of having it on the net. but we decided that most of the video would be of the cat sleeping in different locations. It could be a cool idea......kitty spys lol

    --
    The Arkie Libertarian
  123. voice recognignition by obtuse · · Score: 2, Funny

    My girlfriend taught me a voice recognition algorithm for her landlord's cat Ella. Listen when Ella asks to be let in.
    Well articulated sounds are OK.
    Poorly articulated noises, that would indicate a mouth full of mouse or lizard, mean don't open the door.

    Eventually my girlfriend trained me to use this algorithm. My training was assisted by a 2:30 am hunt for the completely alive mouse that the cat dragged in. Ella dropped the mouse for us, and I tore the house apart to capture & eject it, competing with Ella the cat.

    Married the girlfriend who demonstrated the astonishing ability to train even me.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  124. Smart bloody cats by rediguana · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once, around christmas time, one of our cats had seen us stashing presents under the tree. I was upstairs and heard my mum scream "Ginger's got a bird, come quick." Knowing full well it was my duty to get the bird off him. I came down the stairs and saw him wandering around the corner into the living room where the xmas tree was, and just caught a glimpse of something big and black in his mouth. I rushed down and through into the living room, and low and behold Ginger had deposited a 3/4 size _duck_ still alive on top of the presents under the tree. Luckily the duck wasn't too shaken so we gave Ginger lots of attention (cuddles, councilling... :) and I took the duck over to the neighbours stream and released, twas just shocked I think.

  125. Why do so many dorky people have cats? by RonaldReagan · · Score: 0

    Now, there's nothing wrong with having a cat. But why the hell do so many nerdy people on the internet have websites devoted to cats and / or talk about cats on messageboards and such?

    Is owning a cat geek chic or what?

  126. :%s/Cats/Humans/g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... So we should poison all humains and keep them confined ?

  127. You've made my day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTFL

  128. Cats don't want to be feed by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2

    They want to hunt!

  129. Voice recognition will have problems... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    every time the "Meow Mix" commercial comes on TV. This one commercial could easily burn out the door's solenoid by exceeding its duty cycle....

  130. feature recognition and images by phr2 · · Score: 3, Informative
    The "theory" section of the website begins
    We consider any image to be a collection of a finite number of discrete features. This is a novel approach to images - until now they were always thought of as continuous.
    The cat door hack is cool and all, but the methods used for recognizing it are basically the same ones that most OCR programs use to recognize printed letters. In fact you might even be able to train Omnifont Pro (or whatever it's called) to recognize that silhouette of your cat without a mouse. I've never heard of these methods being applied to cat doors before, but the idea that feature recognition is a novel technique is wishful thinking. I smell bogus patents coming out of this. Sigh.
  131. Obvious: by err666 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Kick the cat's ass out of the door. Eventually, she'll learn. If not, bringt her to the chinese fast food restaurant at the corner >:-)

    --
    reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,map(lambda x:chr(ord(x)^42),tuple('zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b')))
  132. Gives a whole new meaning to... by slasho81 · · Score: 1

    Gives a whole new meaning to CAT SCAN.

  133. i've been thinking of something similar by 5alligator · · Score: 1

    i'm renting, so a cat-door isn't really an option. Usually i just leave a window open, but then i get the whole neighborhood over for snacks.
    I'd like to set up something with finer resolution in order to distinguish between my two cats and any others. I figure one of those super-squirter-water-pistol thingies would do nicely as a deterrent. I've got a nice motorized mount for it. Both my cats are black, so maybe i could work with that. But, now i'm thinking that maybe getting a cat-door and ripping the guts - simple motion-detection triggers query for collar sig. No sig, sudden whirring noise ...
    Could work with those chips that vets will implant for lost-pet identification as well i suppose. Anyone know the protocol used on those?

  134. mod parent up! by 5alligator · · Score: 1

    har har! gawd, i wish i was modding right now...

  135. What if... by distributed.karma · · Score: 1

    your cat is named Erwin S. and he brings home animals that are (|dead> + |alive>)?

    --

    --
    If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  136. Here's an even better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let a few of your biggest, baddest snakes out while the cats roam around.

  137. PSX2 game like this.. by kila_m · · Score: 1

    There is a PSX2 game like this already which digitizes your movements.. cant remeber the game but its a Jap. shooter.. works pretty well.

  138. Yes, but maybe I have another application... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok.

    This is the profile image of Samantha Fox...

    Anytime you see this profile passing in the street, you start this e-arm and make a quick grab for it.

    Then you send an sms to me a give an alert.

    Maybe I'll find a wife after all 8)

  139. Your cat will be upset if you try this. by toganet · · Score: 1

    You know why cats bring the animals they kill in the house? Not trying to teach humans to hunt, as one sod suggested -- rather, they are showing their pet humans that they care forthem , and will provide for them.

    Now, you don't think they bring every rodent they kill into the house, do you?

  140. Cats, hunting, and such by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    We have two cats, the older one housebound from day one, the smaller one from a rescue shelter. From the smaller one's actions, we surmise she had been a farm cat with her combined acumen of hunting skills, her personability with humans, and her immediate ease in using a litter box(!).

    We bought a small fur-lined mouse for her to play with, and she goes batting it around, carrying it in her mouth, and dropping it off near us to toss so that she would fetch. She's also been knocking it under the fridge and doors, they meowing so that we'd go and get it.

    Yep, she has *us* trained to play with the mouse!

    If we set up a face-recognition system, we'd be our little one would be smart enough to out-think it.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  141. You have to factor in the time it's gonna take by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    to get the gopher/mouse/bird/whatever's blood out of your carpet(s).

    ....probably will take you a lot less time than hacking together your proposed lockout device.

    Love trophies from Mighty Hunters(tm) are all well and good, but you have to draw the line at things which are still bleeding or, worse, ambulatory. Practically anything "a cat drags in"(tm) is usually bleeding, and the cats tend to prefer to pin the stuff down and eat it on the carpet, rather than a nice, hard, _cleanable_ surface like linoleum.

    If the quarry is small it might be able to run somewhere (say, under the refrigerator) where the cat can't get at it, which I regard as a big problem. The cat does, too.

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    1. Re:You have to factor in the time it's gonna take by Falcula · · Score: 1

      My cat isn't a killer, it just want's you to know how clever it is. Unfortunately after that it lets these trophys go and relocate in the house. I've had mice, hummingbirds and many many huge moths brought in, dropped and allowed to roam free while she heads back out to get more.

      On the plus side she hasn't discovered the joy of earthworms that my friend's cat thinks is the best trophy...

  142. To let cats outside is wrong by bodland · · Score: 1

    there are dozens of issues with letting cats roam free out of doors. Everyday thousands of cats are born in the wild that threaten native species including rare mammals and birds. A single group of cats can clear a huge area of nearly every small mammal and local birds.

    Not to mention it is unhealthy for cats to be outside as they are no longer capable of withstanding the onslaught of disease and parasites. Even in an enclosed yard the risk is still great for the cat to contract disease and parasites including round worm

    When we adopted our last cat from the Humane Shelter we signed an agreement to nueter and never let the cat roam freely outside.

  143. How new is this really? by mwood · · Score: 1

    The "theory" section seems to treat feature extraction as something new. Am I missing something, or doesn't this go back at least as far as Minsky & Papert's work on perceptrons?

    I was just re-reading Hofstadter's _Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid_ last week and there was a nice compact description of the problem and the theory about how human brains solve it, which sounds quite similar. This book is now older than some of the people working in the field of image recognition.

    (Rats, now I've gotta figure out where I put my copy of _Perceptrons_.)

  144. Re:Too bad you arent sentient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proving once again that a tiny bit of knowledge is a very dangerous thing. Hey numbskull, did you, after seeing this little tidbit on the discovery channel while surfing between ESPN and FOX News, manage to catch the bit about when a group of male lions takes over a pride, they defend each others cubs like thier own?
    nah.

  145. Why on Gods Earth Would You Want a Dog????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They smell, are oily, slobbery, bark, are very dependent, are dumb, stupidly benign and ungraceful, and in general are useless.

    The only good dog is a dead one!

  146. FFFish and the Birds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Most wild FFFish gobble endless bags of chips, consume enourmous amounts of ganja, and gobble up cat litter like it was going out of style. FFFish also likes dining outdoors where his meals comprise 70 percent peyote, 20 raw dead rats, and 10 percent assorted live bait."

    It may be argued that responsible society would insist on neuterering FFFish, as well as keeping him strictly indoors and away from all women, children, and small livestock.

  147. perfect slashdot story by jafac · · Score: 1

    if this isn't "news for nerds", I don't know what is.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  148. Sub-urban cats love the outdoors! by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    and it doesn't seem to do them much harm.

    Deep in the city, there are probably too many stray cats to provide a good environment. I've known a couple of inner-city people who've had problems letting their cats out because they get beaten up _badly_ by tougher cats. We're talking about peeing blood and requiring hospitalization, as well as nasty infections from bites. This is less of a problem in the suburbs because it's a (slightly) more natural environment - there are lots more trees and bushes for cover, many more small animals to hunt - and no doubt simply less crowding.

    Any cat that only lasts two or three years, indoors or out, is living a very tough life. Most suburban cats (neutered or not) go ten or fifteen years or more unless hit by cars. Yeah, an uncastrated male will get into fights and occasionally he'll lose these fights and get beat up, but he'll go right back outside for more. Who are you to keep him inside? The lady cats are out there.

    Cats with their own doors are demonstrably happier than confined cats or cats dependant on their humans for door service. Cats with their own doors will crap outside and prefer it that way, eliminating the smell of an inside box. Of course they'll hunt, too, and unless they're wimps they'll catch all kinds of things, greatly supplementing their diet. Let's see _you_ live on meat-flavored cereal your entire life without developing some deitary-deficiency disease or other.

    My only objection to the Great Furred Hunters(tm) is that their prey is usually bleeding and the feathers make a terrible mess. Hunting also seems to be the most lucrative in the single-digit hours of the morning, typically when I _least_ want my feline friend to present me with a baby rabbit (an animal capabable of producing a surprising amount of noise!).

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    1. Re:Sub-urban cats love the outdoors! by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Like I said, our cat is afraid of the outdoors, generally the noise of cars, lawnmowers, etc. He certainly wouldn't want to roam unattended, and doesn't even like to be outside with us. Maybe we just have a wimpy cat.

      We used to live in a part of town with many cats, and finding someone else's cat's excrement in one's back yard was a problem. I was glad our own cat didn't annoy our neighbors this way. It has not proven difficult to keep a litter box fairly clean, and unsmelly (of course, the cat has his own bathroom, with the litter box, so it isn't in an undesirably visible part of the house).

      Then, there was the problem of theft. There was a fairly strong black market for long-haired Persian cats where we lived, and cat-napping was not unheard of. Since a kitten cost around $200, this was somewhat understandable.

      As far as a hunting instinct he'd have much fun chasing and catching the flies and moths that would occasionally get in the house. Though, he has not seamed interested in this for the past few years (he's 10). According to the vet, he is healthy, and not obese, or lacking any nutritional supplements. He eats dried cat food, with an occasional treat of "Pounce!" treats. His digestive system is rather finicky (unlike his appetite), and is particularly sensitive to chicken -- bathing a Persian cat suffering from the runs is NOT fun (excessive bathing isn't good for the fur either).

      About the most traumatic thing he goes through is the semi-annual shaving: A Persian can't groom itself sufficiently well and needs regular brushing, and periodic shaving.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  149. ...or too stuborn by DrCode · · Score: 2

    We had one of those magnet-detecting cat doors, and had it set to keep the cat inside. She just bashed through it.

  150. Uh, well, yeah. by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    I don't see cats killing things as a problem.

    If it weren't for the cats, small rodents and birds would proliferate in suburbs, causing potential health problems. They'd be limited only by their food supply, which is approximately equal to human food supplies (mice, in particular, can get into anything that isn't protected by a metal can). When I lived on a dairy farm the cats were regarded as essential to the control of the rodents.

    Even in the cities, where your statistics suggest that the cats would eliminate every other living creature, large numbers of birds and rodents survive the decimation wrought by domestic felines. There is simply no shortage of supply.

    The "ecosystem" of a suburb is basically that of any other human garden: what the hew-mons want to grow, grows, what the hew-mons don't want gets eliminated. Factor in the humans' tendancy to dislike having small animals infiltrate their pantries and raid their food supplies and you get a several-thousand-year-old friendship between us and these little predators.

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    1. Re:Uh, well, yeah. by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, you are wrong in your assumptions. Cats are a substantial problem for wildlife, and have reduced numbers of some birds to near-extinction.

      The problem is that domesticated cats suffer none of the disadvantge of the wild animals: they're well-fed, don't have to suffer the elements, and are kept in tip-top health by their owners. Domestic cats simply are not a part of the natural ecosystem.

      Further, cats are competing significantly against wild populations: owls, skunks, foxes, and such. It's a double whammy.

      As for "no shortage of supply" of birds, you may want to consider that there are a dozen or so endangered or watch-list birds. The cats don't distinguish between them and the non-endangered species.

      Cats are exerting a pressure against these populations that really isn't necessary: hell, it's not like we're giving any of these creatures a break, what with our exer-expanding lust for golf-courses, shopping malls, and parking lots.

      There is absolutely no need to let one's cat roam and kill. Those who do do must be doing so out of ignorance of the consequences or out of sheer hatred of nature. Certainly they can not do it because it's good for the environment or good for the cat.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    2. Re:Uh, well, yeah. by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Let's rephrase that opening line: have *contributed* to reducing the population of some bird species to near-extinction.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  151. Re:Cats are monsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, cats are smart enough to stay away from demanding jobs. Cats let dogs handle that stuff.

  152. Re:Too bad you arent feline by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Havn't you heard News accounts of Male Defactos (or Stepfathers)
    torturing (or killing) children that they themselves didn't father?

    'Higher form of life?' - Sheesh!!!
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  153. Re:KEVIN EALY=KLERCK by forged · · Score: 1
    Seems that some people are too afraid of their own ideas/propaganda to post this kind of comments while logged in.

    Looser AC.