Slashdot Mirror


The Lone Gunmen Aren't Dead?

A reader writes: "With the series finale of The X-Files rapidly approaching, the official site has recently been updated with a brief description and a few images from the final episode. Normally, this would not be a notable occurance - except for the fact that one of the images, which are said to be from the final episode, is of The Lone Gunmen!"

223 comments

  1. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you didn't give away the story line, you just lied about it?

    1. Re:So... by B3ryllium · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they willfully participated in a campaign of misinformation?

    2. Re:So... by jmccay · · Score: 2

      *******Spoiler Alert******************

      I watched the last X-Files show (unfortunately). They are dead. Through out the whole show Molder (sp?) sees and talks with ghosts of the people who have died. They are dead.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  2. Lone Gunman Series by MBCook · · Score: 1

    If they're not dead, then they could bring the series back! I hope they do, that was one of the best shows on TV. They could give it the X-Files' timeslot too.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Lone Gunman Series by geoswan · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I agree. I found "The Lone Gunmen" to be one of the most intelligent shows on TV. I thought it was as good as or better than the best X-files episodes.

      I particularly liked that the super-intelligent chimps were housed at the "Boulle Primate Research Center". Pierre Boulle, was the author of the novel that was eventually made into the movie Planet of the Apes. He wrote the novel that was made into Bridge over the River Kwai as well.

    2. Re:Lone Gunman Series by jasamaman · · Score: 1

      Not only was it intelligent, but it had great foresight also! Remember the episode with the plane going straight towards the World Trade Center?

      Nine Eleven anyone?

      --
      Someone ever tries to kill you, you try to kill them right back!
    3. Re:Lone Gunman Series by The+Monster · · Score: 2
      If they're not dead, then they could bring the series back!
      Even if they are 'dead', all they have to do is have Scully wake up
      and find them in the shower with Patrick Duffy or something.
      --

      [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
      SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    4. Re:Lone Gunman Series by Snaller · · Score: 1

      >. I found "The Lone Gunmen" to be one of the most intelligent shows on TV

      If that was the case heaven help us!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    5. Re:Lone Gunman Series by mskfisher · · Score: 1

      your .sig is (Score:5,Insightful)

      --
      0x0D 0x0A
  3. It's not over yet? by saintlupus · · Score: 4, Funny

    With the series finale of The X-Files rapidly approaching

    Christ, is that _still_ on?

    --saint

    1. Re:It's not over yet? by 56ker · · Score: 2

      "Christ, is that _still_ on?" - it's comments and attitudes like that that led to the falling viewing figures that led to its demise. It hasn't been the same since David Duchovny started appearing for about thirty seconds in each episode though. However good Scully and the actor who played T-3000 in Terminator 2 are - it just isn't the same.

    2. Re:It's not over yet? by BigBir3d · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "it's comments and attitudes like that that led to the falling viewing figures that led to its demise."

      no, that would be the significant drop in quality of the shows episodes.

    3. Re:It's not over yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That show was dead a looooooooooong time ago. X-files has been a walking corpse since it's second season. I wish it would just GO AWAY

    4. Re:It's not over yet? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

      Yea, arent comments like "Is it still on?" indicicate that people arent paying attention to it because its crap...

    5. Re:It's not over yet? by joFFeman · · Score: 1

      when character development became the focal point of the show, season 3-4 on, it really lost something. i don't know about other people, but if i wanted to watch a primetime soap opera, i'd watch one.


      i'd rather see aliens, leech dudes, chupacabra (chupacabrae?!), or half-psychotic, part-time conjoined twins.


      pregnancy and understated love-affairs are recent topics, and while these topics are interesting, they have no place in a television show founded upon conspiracy theories and slimy things that kill people.

      --
      "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
    6. Re:It's not over yet? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Of course it's still on: how else could they keep spoiling the endings?

    7. Re:It's not over yet? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Personally I think it lost its charm after the third season. It's kind of like the Pretender; both series started out strong, but were secret-conspiracied into soap opera silliness.

    8. Re:It's not over yet? by phaze3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Too true.

      The X-Files was a great show up until around the end of season 2. After then things went downhill - and fast.

      X-Files should have never tried to run for more than a couple of series - there are only so many times the main charecters can almost see something eerie, but not quite, maintaining that skeptic vs believer thing. Once Scully believed Mulder, the show was over IMO.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    9. Re:It's not over yet? by mpa000 · · Score: 1

      The show ended tidily years ago with Scully informing some committee that Agent Mulder was dead. Everything after that is some absolutely uninteresting parallel universe.

      I may, however, break down and watch the final episode just to make sure it's really dead and gone for good.

      .mpa

      --
      This is my .sig. There are many like it but this one is mine....
    10. Re:It's not over yet? by aiabx · · Score: 1

      You speak as if it was our _duty_ to watch some crappy TV show, and if we don't, then we're failing to do what is expected of us. Well, if the producers can't come up with a TV show that appelas to me, I'm not going to watch it, and to hell with the advertisers, producers and anyone who think's it's my fault that they can't watch their favourite TV show.
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
    11. Re:It's not over yet? by tymesf · · Score: 1

      I'm more forgiving. Things really went downhill after seaon 4. The Jeremiah Smith subplot was fairly decent, and the Tunguska/Terma episode pair were good as well. Memento Mori is, as I recall, one of the episodes that always ends up on X-Files marathons.

    12. Re:It's not over yet? by tymesf · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. If they had stuck to aliens and not gotten derailed by the paranormal-event-of-the-week syndrome, the show might have been decent after the first few seasons. I'm not sure who decided to go off the deep end with the inbreeding trans-generational episode, but that pretty much did it for me. They explained it away with chromosomal defects, but in the process eliminated any possible link to governmental conspiracy, aliens, or anything else central to the X-Files. I could also do without all the monster crap; Toombs might have been a popular centerpiece for a few episodes, but he/it wasn't interesting within a larger context.

      They really should have stayed with government coverups, aliens, and the bio- and tech-stuff. Part of the problem may have been that they twisted the green-blooded alien theme around so many times they couldn't return to it without totally confusing everyone. They didn't have to stick with just those aliens, but so many of the episodes after the first few seasons not only jumped head first off the deep-end, but jumped into a dry pool and failed to tie in with aliens, the government, or any reasonably intriguing biological or technological subject.

    13. Re:It's not over yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you say that Quantum Leap's 'Event of the Week' format hurt the overall story and damaged the series?

    14. Re:It's not over yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be because the crap content in the last couple of years combined with David Duchovney leaving.

      It went straight to hell right after the movie.

      I awlays watched for the coverup angle, and the wierd shit. I hated the in your face alien angle that started cropping up after the movie.

      I watched two episodes this season, and they were both terrible. The first one, which I can't even remember, and the one where Scully gave up her baby.

      Why don't they just make the whole thing a dream, with the shit they pulled with CSM's kid. He was shot at point blank range. WTF, can you say "Dallas", or "St. Elsewhere" (I think it was Dallas, didn't watch, just remembered everyone yelling about it).

      Bring back Harsh Realms if you are going to bring back anything.

  4. Way to ruin it *again*!!! by PunchMonkey · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ARGH!!! You already ruined it a few weeks ago by telling me they were dead, and now you ruin the finale by telling me they aren't!!!!

    HELLO? Spoiler Warnings please???!! Next you're going to be telling me that Anakin is Luke's father and that Clark Kent is really Superman!

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    1. Re:Way to ruin it *again*!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And CmdrTaco gets another noun he can use as a verb:

      To "Lone Gunmen squared" something.

    2. Re:Way to ruin it *again*!!! by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      heh sorta like when titanic came out. "The ship sinks"

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    3. Re:Way to ruin it *again*!!! by Skirwan · · Score: 5, Funny
      Next you're going to be telling me that Anakin is Luke's father and that Clark Kent is really Superman!
      Oh, now you're just being silly. I mean, Clark Kent wears glasses, for crying out loud!

      Next you're going to go and tell us that Spider-Man is some nerdy photographer and Batman is a millionaire playboy. I mean, really.

      --
      Damn the Emperor!
    4. Re:Way to ruin it *again*!!! by dimator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can we all stop the "Anakin is Luke's father????" jokes? They've been old for a few years now.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    5. Re:Way to ruin it *again*!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah! He is? Well holy jeez. Wow.

    6. Re:Way to ruin it *again*!!! by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Sorry man, but Homer Simpson gave them new life. "Who'd have thunk that Darth Vader was Luke Skywalkers father?"

      If the Simpsons made a reference to it, it's still open to being quoted.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Way to ruin it *again*!!! by Babbster · · Score: 1
      Besides, Homer will be quotable forever.

      Good d'oh to you all.

    8. Re:Way to ruin it *again*!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEVER!
      Blasphemy!!

    9. Re:Way to ruin it *again*!!! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      Thanks a lot! Next you'll be telling me that Bambi's mother dies or something!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    10. Re:Way to ruin it *again*!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're going to die.

  5. It's a trial by pmcneill · · Score: 1

    I think I remember reading that this episode will be Mulder on trial. As such, it's likely they'll appear in some flashbacks. This doesn't mean they aren't dead.

    1. Re:It's a trial by strredwolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      TV Guide confirms this -- It's going to be a trial of Mulder, which will involve several flashbacks.

      --

      --
      # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
      $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    2. Re:It's a trial by Maax · · Score: 1

      The image shows them stood in a desert, for God's sake. Didnt any of you see Wayne's World 2? I bet Val Kilmer is stood just off set going "Guys, guys, tell Mulder he has to organize a rock concert!"

    3. Re:It's a trial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the ending to Seinfeld

    4. Re:It's a trial by rizzo5 · · Score: 1
      It's going to be a trial of Mulder, which will involve several flashbacks.

      or perhaps the lone gunmen will appear alive to testify against mulder, all in full body respirators with horribly burned faces and completely paralysed, able to communicate only by beeping once for yes and twice for no. this will be the framing device for the flashbacks.

    5. Re:It's a trial by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      If that's the case, then there'll have to be appearences by butt-head aliens who want our women.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  6. Not that I care about either series by wheany · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Not that I care about either series, but spoilers like that are ghey.

    1. Re:Not that I care about either series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this flamebait?

      Sure, the wording is wrong, but you don't post spoilers without warning. Not even when you're being funny and referencing to an older blooper.

    2. Re:Not that I care about either series by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      How is it a spoiler? Anything on the official site can't be that big a secret, IMO.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    3. Re:Not that I care about either series by wheany · · Score: 1

      A secret isn't the same thing as a spoiler. And some people avoid official sites of tv series and movies because they might contain spoilers.

  7. flashbacks flashbacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are a very fun tool.

    And they make Hemos look like a tool.

    Good job whoring for Fox b.t.w.

  8. Not again!!! by displague · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, You really "The Lone-Gunmen are dead"ed that one, didn't you???!!!

    Shall I even watch the last episode? Why don't you just post it's contents in slashdot subjects over the next 29.25 hours?

    --
    Marques Johansson
    1. Re:Not again!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old News. No Spoiler Here, move along

  9. Frankly do we care? by happyhippy · · Score: 1, Informative
    This is not a troll.

    But does anyone really care enough about X-Files past season 4-5? I dont.

    It should have died then. And I expect Carter & Co to bring out a cheesy finale where Mulder discovers he is an alien himself and charged with enslaving mankind.

    1. Re:Frankly do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But does anyone really care enough about X-Files past season 4-5? I dont.

      I did, until you showed me the light of your ways. Thank you.

  10. mulders delusions by bottlecap · · Score: 1

    from what i've read, several dead characters are goign to be itn eh last episode, though they are only mulders memories or delusions

    bart

    1. Re:mulders delusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've had the New Characters, the wacky, non-sensical plots....I'm waiting for Mulder to develop Magic Powers!

  11. Flash back by BagOBones · · Score: 1

    Not that I have cared about the X-files for a few years now.. But the fact that there is a picture of them in the last episoed means nothing.. There could just be a flashback that contains them or maybe they bill pull a Voyager and go back in time using an alien ship to make sure they don't die.. For most, I think the show jumped the shark when the movie was made.

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    1. Re:Flash back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was a movie? what on earth are you talking about?

    2. Re:Flash back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it was called "X-Files: The Movie". Hard to miss, really.

  12. posthumous appearences by Saint+Nobody · · Score: 5, Insightful

    keep in mind that both deep throat and mulder's father appeared posthumously in dream sequences in the third season, and scully's father appeared posthumously in a dream sequence in the second season. there's probably more, but it's been too long since i've watched the show, and i don't remember others. there's also been some occurences of people appearing in flashback sequences after they've died. that's how deep throat got into the fourth season. not to mention shapeshifters taking the forms of dead people. that happened a few times. most notably at the beginning of season 4.

    then again, "killing" characters only to have them turn out to still be alive has happend more that its share of times. mulder, krycek and the smoking man have all died and come back a few times.

    --
    #define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}
    F(#define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}%cF(%s))
    1. Re:posthumous appearences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, Krychek has only been killed ONCE and the smoking man has never been killed - shot at, yes, but KILLED? No.

      Muldur, on the the other hand, has crawled out of the grave repeatedly.

    2. Re:posthumous appearences by tealover · · Score: 0

      I Hope this is true (Lone Gunman Are Not Dead), because then we don't have to hear Taco and the rest of the SLash crew make it into a verb ("i'll try not to lone-gunman this...")

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    3. Re:posthumous appearences by cnladd · · Score: 1, Troll

      Sounds exactly like some of the soap operas my mother used to watch. You know, the ones where some chick is terrorized by someone who's really her long lost evil twin. The evil twin somehow kills the good chick, then the good chick wakes up at the end of the week and realizes it was all some horrible nightmare.

      I've never seen a complete episode of X-Files. Your post above made me realize that I really wasn't missing much, other than some paranormal, conspiracy theorists type of soap. :)

      --

      --
      Welcome to the land of the easily amused...

    4. Re:posthumous appearences by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      And don't forget that the whole show has been appearing posthumously for the last several seasions.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  13. Dead? I spoke with one of them the other day... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Yes, it's true," he told me, "We're not really dead. Tell everyone not to worry. See, we're just actors. All that stuff you see on the TV show? It's not real. It's just make-believe. You know, stories?"

    Honestly, even if they were killed off in the series, they could always be brought back in flashbacks, time-warps, cloning experiments, dream sequences, etc. etc.

    You don't have to un-write what was written or disrupt continuity in order to have dead characters come back...

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Dead? I spoke with one of them the other day... by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      Dude, this is the X-Files, they don't need any reason to bring dead characters back.

      The only thing good about that is that you get to see your least favourite characters die repeatedly. I'm always big on that.

      --Dan

  14. Doesn't matter by DustMagnet · · Score: 1
    It doesn't matter if they are dead or not, they're not real. It's fiction.

    Seriously, the series could take place before they died or just say polymorphic transexual hyperbolic aliens impersonated the Lone Gunman during their deaths.

    --
    'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    1. Re:Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet YOU'RE fun at parties...

  15. It just goes to show you... by ScriptGuru · · Score: 1

    If you are a geek with cool toys, you can never die.

    --
    Yet another signature that refers to itself. The irony and humor is dead.
    1. Re:It just goes to show you... by Kerinsky · · Score: 1

      Of course they sold all their cool toys looking for Jimmy who was looking for Eve, so I guess they can die.

      Joey Ramone lives forever though...

      --

      Damnit I AM acting my age. I'm 15 in hex!

  16. Another Possibility by erasmus_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not to be sarcastic, but is the submitter of the original story not familiar with a narrative device called a flashback? Just because they're in a picture of the episode, does not mean they're still alive.

    If they died to begin with, that is - I really have no idea, I have stopped watching a few seasons ago when it just got too convoluted. But I was disappointed to hear that they potentially bit the dust when that was reported, I always liked them, so hopefully that they are indeed alive. I'm definitely going to see the next XFiles movie, and they'd make a good addition to it.

    --
    Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    1. Re:Another Possibility by joepa · · Score: 1

      Not to be sarcastic, but is the submitter of the original story not familiar with a narrative device called a flashback? Just because they're in a picture of the episode, does not mean they're still alive.

      Read the original post. I do not believe the "submitter" said anything about them being alive...

    2. Re:Another Possibility by ez76 · · Score: 2
      Not to be sarcastic, but is the submitter of the original story not familiar with a narrative device called a flashback?
      Hang on - what's sarcasm?
    3. Re:Another Possibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beats the shit out of me.

  17. News, not Rumours by KoopaTroopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are rumours of what characters appear on the XFiles what Slashdot is all about? I mean, "News for Nerds" and all, but if I want analysis of publicity pictures of a television show I can go to any number of other rumour sites. I come here for some nifty Science, Computing, and Social news, along with some often interesting talking on the boards.

    Oh well, it's just my two cents.

    --
    Sharpies don't just sniff themselves.
  18. Or the simplest way. by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

    Just tell everyone "This all happend before they died".

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Or the simplest way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or pull a 'Dallas', have someone wake up and say 'oh, it was all just a bad dream'.

    2. Re:Or the simplest way. by cybermage · · Score: 2

      Or pull a 'Dallas', have someone wake up and say 'oh, it was all just a bad dream'.

      I'd rather have it end in a Newhart way. Maybe Scully wakes up after falling asleep waiting to meet the director in the pilot episode. Instead of waiting around, she takes off her badge and leaves. Roll credits.

      At the end of the series finale on Newhart, Bob wakes up next to his wife from The Bob Newart Show. The whole series had been a dream.

  19. Umm... by DeltaBlaster · · Score: 1

    I really don't think they are still alive, they were buried in the ground at the end of the episode they died in. In all likely hood it will be flash backs of Mulder where we see them. Just my opinion.

    --
    (This Space For Rent) ....($50 A Month).... (Contact The Voices In Your Head)
    1. Re:Umm... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

      Oh, they'll be brought back to life, but with really serious issues, because they were in Heaaaaaa-ven... ;)

    2. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean they will have to kill *THREE* demons?

  20. Fox Seinfeld by XBL · · Score: 4, Funny

    He is on trial for laughing at a fat man getting mugged, by an alien.

    1. Re:Fox Seinfeld by Ko5mo · · Score: 1

      I love it that Seinfeld never seens to die.
      Trial of Mulder that involves flashback with all the other characters. Bubble Boy lives!

  21. Imagine that! by Evro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine how hard it would be to include an image of the Lone Gunmen from a previous X-Files episode! Since that's so difficult, clearly it must mean that they're bringing them back to life!

    --
    rooooar
  22. But does anyone care? by carlhirsch · · Score: 5, Informative

    This article on Salon talks about how bad a job Chris Carter's done in wrapping up loose ends.

    I'm inclined to agree. Out of these last few episodes, there hasn't been nearly so much exposition on the "mythology" as I would have liked or expected.

    -carl

    --
    . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
    1. Re:But does anyone care? by doorbot.com · · Score: 2

      For all the bad mouthing he Salon article provides, the author says at the end that that he'll be in front of the TV watching the final show.

      That's all Chris Carter really wants. What are you going to do if it sucks, or Chris Carter just stands there for 2 hours and says, "Gotcha!" and then they proceed to have a "best of" episode? Are you going to ask your TV for your money back? Perhaps bang your head against the wall and then write a half-way sane letter to the FBI about how you're "onto" them?

      Yeah, go for it.

      Maybe it's just me, but when I said I'd stop watching, I actually stopped... I'd say after the movie that was the end of it -- when the first new TV episode after the movie didn't even recognize what happened in the movie... well it was over for me.

    2. Re:But does anyone care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blaming Chris Carter for not wrapping up loose ends is like blaming Britney Spears for lack of substance.

      Chris Carter is not interested in wrapping up loose ends. Chris Carter is interested in whatever elaborate mystification captures the imagination of his audience.

    3. Re:But does anyone care? by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2

      I doubt too many care. Too many people have stopped watching the show myself included. Who cares? The show did get too out-of-control. I think that stuff seemed to happen almost at random. Beyond the level of believability for that universe.

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  23. OK, now I'm confused by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Are they dead? Aren't they?

    Should I be wailing in misery for being spoiled? Have I been spoiled?

    Is chrisd really a mole for /. sent by Chris Carter?

    And will the Truth be revealed as something to do with CowboyNeal?

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  24. Time to move on... by donnacha · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    For years now we've all been getting our viewing thrills by letting The X-Files work us into an enjoyable froth of paranoia and conspiracy theory.

    Everything, however, has a sell-by date and time has moved on; now, after 9/11, we've got reality to worry us in a way in which no TV show can compete.

    We're going to look back at Nineties TV, and the X-Files in particular, as representing an age of naive innocence, before our colective chickens came home to roost.

    1. Re:Time to move on... by donnacha · · Score: 1

      Why in the name of Hell was my comment rated off-topic?

      I thought the meta-moderating system was meant to weed out these rogue moderators?

    2. Re:Time to move on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My GOD you're pathetic!!! American huh?

    3. Re:Time to move on... by or_smth · · Score: 1
      Who/What are you? JonKatz?

      No, on 9/11 the world was not attacked by mysterious aliens. Aliens and the paranormal have fascinated people for ages, and some things do not change, buildings or no buildings.

    4. Re:Time to move on... by donnacha · · Score: 1

      > Who/What are you? JonKatz?

      Boy, that's a low blow!

      > No, on 9/11 the world was not attacked
      > by mysterious aliens. Aliens and the
      > paranormal have fascinated people for
      > ages, and some things do not change,
      > buildings or no buildings.

      True, but the way in which that traditionally niche fascination became, via the X-Files, a mainstream pre-occupation was a reflection of the times.

      What I'm saying is that the times have now changed, drastically so. It is, of course, a touchy subject and I'm not really surprised my original post was unfairly moderated down, but if we want to get the full picture and, in this case, a clearer picture of what the X-Files really meant to our culture, we have to factor the major shifts that have happened since it's first airing.

      Well-written though it undoubtedly is, if The X-Files were to launch today, post 9/11, it would have seemed naive and, well, off-topic, and would never have made it to a 2nd series.

    5. Re:Time to move on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If not offtopic, flamebait for sure

    6. Re:Time to move on... by Karma+Sink · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ... You are aware that nothing changed for most of the world? Just for Americans...

      Go ahead, turn this into a jingoistic thread about how much you love your country, and you have all of the popular entertainment. You're still a jack-ass, and you're still off topic.

      --

      When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
  25. Can you say... by xbrownx · · Score: 0

    ...dream sequence?

    They are standing around in some weird pseudo-symbolical desert, after all.

  26. Captain Kirk by mathematician · · Score: 3, Funny

    Spoiler Warning:

    Captain Kirk is killed on Star Trek 6 (The Undiscovered Country) - I saw it on the previews.

    1. Re:Captain Kirk by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Spoiler Warning:

      Captain Kirk is killed on Star Trek 6 (The Undiscovered Country) - I saw it on the previews.


      You know, I've often wished that they killed me off of TNG, because that would have guranteed my return, multiple times, across numerous series and movies.

      Instead, I got to take off with the Galactic Pedophile.

      Dang.

    2. Re:Captain Kirk by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Wil, aren't you supposed to be in Nemesis?

      So the Traveler was a Galactic Pedophile??? Interesting!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    3. Re:Captain Kirk by x98chn · · Score: 1

      You know, I've often wished that they killed me off of TNG, because that would have guranteed my return, multiple times, across numerous series and movies.

      Well, there's always the movie to make your wishes come true
      Maybe they'll even give you one of them nifty read shirts from TOS :)

    4. Re:Captain Kirk by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      You know, I've often wished that they killed me off of TNG

      Strangely enough Wil, you aren't alone in that sentiment.

      IIRC, there are whole NEWS GROUPS dedicated to the topic.

    5. Re:Captain Kirk by Vuarnet · · Score: 2

      IIRC, there are whole NEWS GROUPS dedicated to the topic. Yeah, all of them clones from the Muppets' Swedish Chef. Bork bork bork!

      But let's be honest, Wil (with one 'l'... gotta love The Weakest Link) was a good actor given a lousy character. Or, rather, a semi-decent character given too much attention in some parts of the season, left to obscurity in other parts, and not very well-written, either.

      Kirk was cooler than Piccard, anyway.

      --
      Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
      Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Captain Kirk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you should reappear. Wesley was neat. Okay, they couldn't have worked harder to make him irritating but there were still times when he was fundamentally one of the better characters. After all, against competition like, ooh, just about everybody in Voyager, or Deanna 'Hey, I'm in a war zone and you know what? I sense conflict' Troi, I'm thinking on average Wes was okay.

      I think most of the people who hated Wes were probably people who hadn't worked out just how bad the Star Trek thing was going to get in later seasons and series...

      Now ten people are going to disagree... hi guys.

      Though I was thinking, if we bought him back in the future, right, he could have matured into a fullblown adult geek. That'd be vastly amusing. At last, a reason to watch Star Trek, The Movie After The One That Wasn't Particularly Good But At Least Had Data Acting As A Flotation Device.

  27. Did it AGAIN! by Trickster+Coyote · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Geeze. First you guys spoil it for everyone by blabbling about the Lone Gunmen are dead before half the people here get a chance to see the episode, and now you are doing it again, blabbing about how the Lone Gunmen _aren't_ before the show is even on the air.

    If Slashdot keeps on blaring all these spoilers on the front page, I don't think I'll ever be able to enjoy watching the X-Files again.

    --
    Ideology is for ideots.
    1. Re:Did it AGAIN! by weinford · · Score: 1

      Maybe this makes the first spoiler less notable. if they aren't really dead, noone can complain about the first spoiler anymore, since they being dead is a) not true, und b) only to introduce some certain tention into the series which /. just increased by the spoiler.

      --

      This sig is stolen from someone who had a much better idea than I had.
    2. Re:Did it AGAIN! by Hydro-X · · Score: 2, Funny

      If Slashdot keeps on blaring all these spoilers on the front page, I don't think I'll ever be able to enjoy watching the X-Files again.

      Well, I guess you're in luck, seeing as this is the final episode and all. Oh wait, did I spoil that for you too?

    3. Re:Did it AGAIN! by zCyl · · Score: 3, Funny

      If Slashdot keeps on blaring all these spoilers on the front page, I don't think I'll ever be able to enjoy watching the X-Files again.

      Trust no one...

    4. Re:Did it AGAIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They lone-gunmen a loan-gunmen appearence! I must agree with you. I find slashdot quite ruins the great suspense-epic that is the X-Files. I hereby state that, as an X-Phile, I will cease reading Slashdot until the X-Files ends! Woe is me! When shall I read my Slashdot again?!

    5. Re:Did it AGAIN! by America+Uber+Alles · · Score: 0

      Not really, because they spoiled THAT episode. Now, they're spoiling the final episode.

    6. Re:Did it AGAIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! good. I hate the X-Files...go view a real show.

  28. Spoiler Math by WEFUNK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it:

    (Lone Gunmen Are Dead) + (Lone Gunmen Aren't Dead)

    Which nets out to be zero.

    Or should it be:

    (Lone Gunmen Are Dead) + ABS(Lone Gunmen Aren't Dead)

    Which equals 2*(Lone Gunmen are Dead) = twice spoiled.

    And then, what happens if this spoiler is wrong?

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    1. Re:Spoiler Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think spoilers are supposed to get multiplied.

      (Lone Gunmen Are Dead) * (Lone Gunmen Aren't Dead) = (Lone^2 Gunmen^2 Are^2 not Dead^2)

  29. Nice try... by BlueFall · · Score: 1

    Nice try, chrisd. Sure we all see that the story appears to be posted by Hemos, but I smell a conspiracy... ;)

  30. WTF?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Lone Gunmen aren't dead?!? Man, can you guys spoil this any more for me?!? Christ!!!

  31. But... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This could very well be a dream or a flashback sequence. Or they could be clones! (sorry, still in Star Wars mode)

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
    1. Re:But... by jx100 · · Score: 1

      These are not the Lone Gunmen you are looking for. Please move along.

  32. Okay, this is beyond a joke by seldolivaw · · Score: 5, Funny

    *First* Slashdot ruins the show for loads of people by saying the Lone Gunmen are dead. *Then*, after all the backlash, Slashdot ruins the show *again* by revealing that they aren't!

    Geez... you think they'd learn!

  33. This is Just Great... by IronTek · · Score: 1, Redundant

    First you spoil the surprise of them dying, and now you spoil the surprise of them coming back?!

    Thank you, Slashdot.

    btw, ironically, you just Lone-Gunmanned the Lone Gunmen...AGAIN!

    1. Re:This is Just Great... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Heh itd also be ironic if the death of the Lone Gunman was a government coverup.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  34. There weren't on Camera by Jakyll · · Score: 0

    They were getting coffee for the crew. I miss those guys.... they should give their show another crack

    1. Re:There weren't on Camera by tragicallykarmic · · Score: 1

      There show does need another shot, but not before they bring Freakylinks back!

  35. You're never dead... by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 1

    ..as long as you're in reruns.

  36. From the looks of it by Mr.+Red+Baron · · Score: 1

    If I had to guess, I'd say it's probably a vision or flashback of somesort.

  37. They are super soldiers now!!!! by SensitiveMale · · Score: 0

    Skinner transferred the bodies for testing. They are NOT buried in Arlington.

  38. have you ever watched the show? by onShore_Jake · · Score: 1

    Dead people have appeared before.
    Flashbacks, hallucinaions, imagination, video, flashbacks...

  39. Deaths -- Hoax? by Trickster+Coyote · · Score: 5, Funny

    Keep in mind we never saw them dead. All we saw were some closed coffins being buried. They probably just went underground and the funeral was a cover. The guys have probably been hanging out with Mulder, eating pizza and watching porn videos.

    Hey, it's TV. No ever actually dies on a TV show, especially on a science fiction one...

    Trickster Coyote
    It must be true - I saw it on TV.

    --
    Ideology is for ideots.
    1. Re:Deaths -- Hoax? by interiot · · Score: 2
      No ever actually dies on a TV show, especially on a science fiction one...

      I guess this one doesn't count then?

    2. Re:Deaths -- Hoax? by detritus. · · Score: 2

      Funny you mention that, Chris Carter was quoted saying "Nobody ever really dies on the X-Files" in a FOX special a few years ago.

    3. Re:Deaths -- Hoax? by Jethro · · Score: 2

      Lots of people die on B5. Some of them more than once, and I think that's the idea the parent port had in mind.

      Also, I don't believe we actually see Sheridan die in this one, do we?

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:Deaths -- Hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Hey, it's TV. No ever actually dies on a TV show, especially on a science fiction one...

      Yup, look at Xena. The writers had to blackmail her into staying dead, or else the souls of innocent others would suffer. The only way they could think of for her to stay dead was to make it be for the greater good.

  40. Or they could just be wrong.. by Zarquon · · Score: 2

    Remember this?

    --
    "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    1. Re:Or they could just be wrong.. by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Remember the First One (Lorien) came and took his body away. I suspect that he's about as dead as Kosh was after Interludes and Examinations. Sheridan is happily drinking hot jala beyond the veil and drawing pictures of dead Shadows.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  41. The Possibility... by or_smth · · Score: 1
    I'm just wondering here, has anyone considered the possibility that this is a flashback yes, but a flashback to something that got cut by the final airing so it seems new to eyes. I know that this has happened with countless clip shows in the past, where people are very confused as to which episode it came from, because it was cut.

    Nothing to be alarmed about here, folks.

  42. the real explanation by emkman · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Lone Gunman aren't dead, their publication was just temporarily shut down due to DMCA violations.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
  43. Ho hum. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    OMG!!! This time Darth Neal will finish them off.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  44. No making up for past sins... by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hemos, try as you may, you can't use this story to make up for Slashdot's (or chrisd's) horrible "The Lone Gunmen Are Dead" headline. Because your typically-intellectual readers are well aware of the possibilities of flashbacks, dream sequences, and other such plot devices, there are other explanations than what seems to be your "See... chrisd wasn't correct in saying the Lone Gunmen are dead! California needn't be pissed off at us anymore!"

    Maybe the best possible solution would be for Slashdot to stick to computer-related stuff and avoid the "Entertainment" subject altogether? Though I must say I'm pretty pleased with simply exlcuding every story posted by chrisd.

    ::Colz Grigor // It was appropriate that in his review of Attack of the Clones, Taco used "lone gunmen" as a verb... Long live CmdrTaco!

    1. Re:No making up for past sins... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2, Redundant

      ... than what seems to be your "See... chrisd wasn't correct in saying the Lone Gunmen are dead! California needn't be pissed off at us anymore!"

      Don't forget timeshifters. I may be east coast, but I don't watch much stuff live since I got a TiVo. I was quite pissed off as well.

    2. Re:No making up for past sins... by harvardian · · Score: 2

      Maybe Chris Carter is an avid reader of Slashdot and thought he'd get Hemos out of a bind. No need to be prematurely hatin', man.

    3. Re:No making up for past sins... by Evro · · Score: 1

      I, too, have enjoyed Slashdot more since blackholing chrisd. I get to miss real gems like Minor Earthquake in California! . Will we be running weather reports from LaGuardia anytime soon? Same category.

      Honestly, while chris dibona may be a nice guy, I find most of his "work" on Slashdot to be severely lacking, and had been contemplating blocking him for a long time. The downside to blocking any of the editors is that you don't know which one is going to post a decent story, so you might be missing out. Of course, anything important will be elsewhere as well. But the Lone Gunmen thing really clinched it for me. Not really because of the giving away of the big secret (I haven't watched X-Files in about 4 years) but because of chris's attitude towards the ordeal - like his refusal to change the headline at all because "I really don't like doing that." Anyhow, fortunately I don't have to see anything from him anymore.

      --
      rooooar
  45. Get Your Facts Straight by shoemakc · · Score: 1

    "The Lone Gunman Are Dead"

    * * *

    "The Lone Gunmen Aren't Dead"

    Gee people....if yer gonna spoil episodes, at least get your facts straight. :-)

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  46. From TVGuide.com by tweakt · · Score: 3, Informative
    This seminal series about the paranormal and an FBI agent's obsession with an alien invasion closes its files. And after nearly a decade of teasing, "the truth" is finally revealed.

    Or is it? Executive producer Frank Spotnitz says the two-hour finale "puts all the pieces together in as straightforward a manner as possible. We give a very definite answer about what's going to happen to the world. But then we pose the question: Can fate be changed? That's the heart of the [episode]." Appropriately, David Duchovny returns to the role of Fox Mulder, who reappears after a yearlong absence and reunites with Scully (Gillian Anderson). Mulder is charged with murder, and Spotnitz says that the resulting military tribunal "creates the framework that allows us to explain what Mulder's been doing for the last nine years." Expect a lot of flashbacks, as well as the reemergence of some infamous characters.

    A second X-Files movie is contemplated after the series ends. "It's not like [the characters'] lives come to an end at the end of the TV series," Spotnitz says. "But I think they've all taken a journey and ended up at a place that feels like completion." Gen. Suveg: William Devane. Toothpick Man: Alan Dale. Skinner: Mitch Pileggi.

    1. Re:From TVGuide.com by X-ViRGE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds to me a lot like the last episode(s) of Seinfeld, where they got to go through a bunch of repeat footage as they explained what the characters were doing the past few years.

    2. Re:From TVGuide.com by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "This seminal series about the paranormal and an FBI agent's obsession with an alien invasion closes its files. And after nearly a decade of teasing, "the truth" is finally revealed."

      If this is true, then they had BETTER finally get a cameo from Elvis in the final show.

  47. A little spoiler warning please!! by onetrueking · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, there goes that surprise from tomorrow's show.

  48. Jeez! Another one? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

    Hey! Thanks for ruining the ending of the episode... AGAIN! How many spoilers about the Lone Gunmen are we going to have, anyway?

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  49. X-Files info.... by HokieSeas · · Score: 1

    Check out the info on the xfiles page, tvguide.com, tv.yahoo.com, just about anything and you will learn Mulder comes up before a military tribunal to defend himself and his work. Now, would that make an interesting series finale, two hours of interview, or do you think they will spread that out with FLASHBACKS and RECOLLECTIONS of what Mulder has found? Just a thought.

    --
    A: You're doing it again.
    B: What's that?
    A: That talking thing....stop it.
    1. Re:X-Files info.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of the finally is to wrap up all of the questions that the past 9 seasons have created. So like you said, they are obviously going to have to be using flashbacks. Despite what everyone says, even though X-Files isn't as good as it used to be it is still one of the better shows on television.

      I don't know about the rest of you but I will be enjoying the season finally tomorrow night!

  50. Are the editors on crack? by EvilNTUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You've apparently learned nothing from the last time you revealed something about the X-Files in advance.

    And don't try to explain yourselves by saying it's not a spoiler, just a rumor. For some people, rumors are too much.

    I stopped visiting Star Trek boards because some people just couldn't keep themselves from accidentally revealing small details about the next movie. Those small details weren't clearly spoilers either, but eventually details pile up to form a bigger picture... One I don't want to have yet!!

    Will I have to stop visiting Slashdot too? Hope not...

    --
    My Sig: SEGV
    1. Re:Are the editors on crack? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was suggested that the lone gunmen aren't dead because they appeared in a teaser for the next episode. That's not a spoiler, unless people refuse to watch the teaser. Trasporting ourselves back in time, to say, 1982. How many Star Wars fanatics refused to watch the trailer for Return of the Jedi because it might show some spoilers? What's that you say? Three people? Well those three people apparently post to /. and I don't care about them, and neither do most others.

  51. In related news, Generalissimo Francisco Franco... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is still dead.

  52. FUCK SALON A LOT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet Jebus. I wasted four minutes of my life on that fucking tripe and I want them back. I honestly don't know why I keep falling for it and clicking those 'Dude, there's something really spiffy-keen on Salon you should read, dude' links. Same smarmy know-it-all asshole pretense. Same total ignorance of the subject matter, no matter what it is, and above and beyond that, _actual pride_ in the ignorance. Same incoherent, pointless rambling. GIVE ME BACK MY FOUR MINUTES.

    Fuck Salon a lot. At least their business model guarantees they won't be around much longer.

  53. Slashdot = TvGuide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hate to break it to you, but nobody wathes that lame show anymore...

  54. argh. by ath0mic · · Score: 1

    why'd you have to go lone gunmen that episode for us.

  55. Annnnd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We care - why? This has *what* to do with *anything* remotely related with Linux and Microsoft?

  56. Flashbacks by deanj · · Score: 1
    I'm sure that they're going to show up....but only in flashbacks.

    What a shame too. Those guys were great.

  57. Shirt. by istewart · · Score: 1

    In the picture, Langly is wearing the exact same shirt that he was wearing in the episode where they died. Of course, it's very possible that he just doesn't wash his clothes all that often, especially after being "dead" for a while.

  58. Flashback by alanjstr · · Score: 2

    Its called a flashback. You know, one of those sequences showing something that has occurred at a previous point in time.

  59. Vancouver actor by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not an X-Files fan. But one of the dudes that plays the lone gunmen is a vancouver actor. He was on a local show by the name of Urban Rush. And he said that he would be in the final episode.

  60. They Might Come Back by DarkZero · · Score: 2

    Chris Carter mentions something in TV Guide about a lot of characters "coming back" for Mulder's trial, which is the plot of the last episode. It sounds like quite a few characters are going to turn out to be alive. I certainly wouldn't be surprised if we end up finding out that guys like X and The Cigarette Smoking Man are back, and I know that some characters that were definitely dead just a few episodes a go will be alive for the last episode.

    And I don't mean flashbacks or anything like that, either. Some of these characters have just been alive all along and either faked their deaths or were resurrected somehow.

    1. Re:They Might Come Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If CSM isn't in this episode, I am going to freak! I've been looking forward to him returning every since Krycek pushed him down those stairs.

    2. Re:They Might Come Back by Servo5678 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Chris Carter mentions something in TV Guide about a lot of characters "coming back" for Mulder's trial, which is the plot of the last episode

      I heard about this one. Apparently Mulder is put on trial for breaking the Good Samaritan law after watching an overweight man get mugged and not acting to help. A lot of characters from past episodes show up in court to testify against him as character witnesses.

      Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    3. Re:They Might Come Back by I+Want+GNU! · · Score: 2

      Sorry but XBL already made that joke in this comment, nearly three hours before you did.

  61. Why all this whining about the Gunmen being dead ? by Bladerunner2037 · · Score: 1

    In one of the last episodes, we were led to believe they died (and were BURRIED) after the poison oozed from the dude. If they are still alive, well, it's classic X-Files. If it's a flashback, well, it's classic X-Files. give it a freakin' rest.

    --
    -- oodabadabaY
  62. This is fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always remember: if you don't find the bodies, then they're still alive.

  63. Well, DUH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they're alive. There was no super-toxic-virus or anything. It was all a huge misunderstanding. The guy just had insane gas and was looking for the closest bathroom.

  64. These are the Rules from Now On by serutan · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The first rule of the Lone Gunmen is, you don't talk about the Lone Gunmen.

    The second rule of the Lone Gunmen is, You Do Not Talk about the Lone Gunmen!

  65. Im glad Im not an X-Files fan.... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Im getting really tired of Slashdot spoiling it in the headlines.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  66. For Pete's Sake by Sentry21 · · Score: 3, Funny

    First you go and give away that they're dead before I get a chance to see it, and then you give away that they're still alive before I get a chance to see it. You guys really hate me, don't you?

    --Dan

    1. Re:For Pete's Sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we just don't care or know that you are alive....

      :)

  67. you are obsessive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you should see a shrink

  68. Astute viewers would have noticed.... by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Careful viewers would have noticed in the preview after last weeks episode that they had a quick image of Alex Krychek.

    He was killed quite dead last season with a bullet to the head in an FBI garage. I don't think they allowed him to crawl away like the Smoking Man did after only being shot in the chest (and hence allowed for his return at the end of season 5).

    So most likely these are flashback images from Mulder or other cast members.

    - A non-productive mind is with absolutely zero balance.
    - AC

  69. I'm not a huge X-Files fan.... by evilpaul13 · · Score: 1

    But they could be appearing in a flashback. Oops, this is probably a spoiler =)

  70. Taco, a note. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You stupid mother fucker. Why can't you just let people watch the show and find out what happens for themselves? Instead you and your stupid fucking editorial staff have to spoil it for all. You'd think that being a socialist would make you care about other people, but NO. You stupid cock suckers, I hope you choke on Timothy's cock.

  71. Mod this +1 Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... fuck Salon in their stupid asses ...

  72. Which one is this? by kir · · Score: 1

    News for Nerds or Stuff that Matters? You know, it seems more and more stories on slashdot don't fall into either catagory. Maybe I'm just not "nerdy" enough?

    --
    3cx.org - A truly bad website.
  73. In other news.... by ebbomega · · Score: 2

    Kevin Spacey is Kayser Soze and the narrator IS Tyler Durden...

    You guys are doing a good track record for the "Let's not ruin the ending of the bloody series for everybody" bit... especially since some people have been waiting all season for this...

    (Honestly, if I were paying attention to this show, I wouldn't go anywhere NEAR the show's website for fear of ruining it... thanks, /.)

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  74. Scifi.com by gabec · · Score: 1

    I submitted this story about two weeks ago but with a link to a scifi.com/scifiwire article where they said something along the lines of "it was unclear whether the Lone Gunmen would return alive or in some kind of flashback."

  75. Hmmm, they look like they might be "Ghosts" to me. by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    All dressed in grey/black, I think the middle one usually wears a brown shirt..., and the left one wearing a "... lives" t-shirt...

    maybe it's a visit from the afterlife =P

  76. Oh brother by travdaddy · · Score: 1

    After the Lone Gunmen fiasco, you would think that Slashdot has learned its lesson about spoilers. Hell, the new term "Lone Gunmen," meaning "giving SPOILERS", has even fairly popular on Slashdot. But no, now Slashdot is trying to "Lone Gunmen" the Lone Gunmen once again.

    --
    Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
  77. Slashback by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't this be a slashback?

  78. Lone Gunmen? by donutello · · Score: 2

    Isn't that an oxymoron? Or are the creators of the X-files grammatically challenged just like the Slashdot editors?

    [For the dense, I'm refering to the use of the adjective lone in connection with the plural word gunmen]

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:Lone Gunmen? by chromatic · · Score: 1

      It's a pun. Besides that, why can't "lone" be a plural adjective? Expand it to "alone", as its Middle English etymology could allow, and pick your preferred definition. "Exclusive" or "Only" would work.

      (I can't believe I'm defending Chris Carter, though.)

  79. no one ever dies on the x-files by liquide · · Score: 1

    I don't remember who said it; but during one of their season specials where they talk about happenings up until the current show, one of the writers (creators, actors?) said, "No one ever really dies in the X-Files." This was when a picture of Deep Throat getting shot came up.

    IMHO, to the X-Files fanaticists, it should be no surprise to see the Lone Gunmen still alive.

  80. did anyone see them dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they're not dead. We never saw the bodies. Granted, when last we saw them they were in a rather bad situation, but after that all we saw were closed coffins. Anyone who watches the xfiles should know that *anything* can be in closed coffins. Or not in.

  81. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So their images apear in the episode, what does that mean? It could be a flashback, a hallucination, a dream, someone's thought sequence. Numerous possibilities exist for them to appear in the final episode and still be quite dead. I'm afraid this battle station will be quite operational when your friends arrive.

  82. Geddy Lee obviously a flashback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    .

    The Geddy Lee guy's look is obviously a flashback.

    .

  83. -1 REDUNDANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SOEMONE SED THTA

  84. SPOILER! Read below by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to an interview with David Duchovny in Newsweek May 20th, 2002 on page 75

    NEWSWEEK:IF I pay you, will you tell me how the series ends?

    David:...I'll say this: it ends in bed.

    So the show on Sunday will end with Scully and Mulder in bed, applying that they just had sex, or are going to. They will probably be smoking cigerattes and and say the cliche 'Was it good for you?' then cut to credits.

  85. Why is this so mysterious? by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    We'll find out tomorrow, but the explanation for this could be as simple as an error on the website, a dream sequence featuring the lone gunmen, or even a flashback. Of course, it's always possible they didn't really die, or that they got resurrected (happens all the time on the show :). As in soap operas, nothing is guaranteed permanent.

  86. Oh please no more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm from Denmark and we're not even halfway through Season 9... Please, no more spoilers

  87. Re:Hmmm, they look like they might be "Ghosts" to by viper66 · · Score: 1

    those are the same clothes they wore in the episode where they died
    the shirt says joey lives (joey ramone)

  88. Great by BtAFMB · · Score: 1

    Great, spoil the Loan Gunman being dead, then spoil them not being dead! I should just stop reading slashdot 'till the end of the series.

    --

    "I have fallen off the wagon, for I am a slave to tea."
  89. The Lone Gunmen are aliens by Erratio · · Score: 1

    Think about it. They could fit right in on 3rd Rock from the Sun.

    --
    I don't try to be right, I just try to make people think
    1. Re:The Lone Gunmen are aliens by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I think I'd rather see them on Buffy.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  90. Its a clip show isn't it? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Mulder is on trial, and they show clips from their previous cases - doesn't sound to promising.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  91. So what if they're dead? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    It could be a good lead-in to their next show: The Undead Lone Gunmen.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:So what if they're dead? by Bladerunner2037 · · Score: 1

      LOL.
      some possible tag lines:
      Exposing conspiracies and eating brains.
      A rag-tag trio of X-Files solving X-Files.

      --
      -- oodabadabaY
    2. Re:So what if they're dead? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      "The brains are out there"
      "Trust no one, eat everyone"
      "He's hiding something, let's open up his head."
      "If you tell anyone this, you're dead men." "Yeah... So?"

      "Looks like the government is covering up the existance of zombies." "Ummm... Is that bad?"
      And they could always do a cross-over with Buffy. (Looks down at stake in his heart, "Hey! That was a new suit!")

      As that proponent of Dead Rights, Reg Shoe (deceased), says "Dead yes. Gone no!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:So what if they're dead? by Bladerunner2037 · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'd like to do a cross-over with Buffy ;)

      --
      -- oodabadabaY
  92. Who cares? by tymesf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    X-Files boils down to too much hokey pseudo-mysterious pop-science bullshit and too little development of the discoveries and conspiracies already presented. There's no way they can wrap up everything even if they had another season. They had a half-dozen seasons worth of episodes to wrap things up properly, and they missed their chance.

    Does anyone care about whether the Lone Gunmen are dead or alive? Does anyone actually expect Carter to redeem himself?

  93. Smoking Man isn't dead? by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    How do we even know Smoking Man is dead? We saw Krycheck push his wheelchair down a flight of stairs, and he was unconscious at the bottom, but Krycheck didn't even check for a pulse before walking away.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
    1. Re:Smoking Man isn't dead? by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Ah, you misread what I said.

      I was referring to an earlier episode in 1997 (Redux 2) where, at the end of the episode, the CSM is shot in the chest through a window. Indeed, his corpse was not found at that point.

      He then showed up near the end of Season 5, thus showing he is quite resilient to bullets.

      - AC

  94. The Q by eracerblue · · Score: 1

    and what?

    you would rather have galavanted around with The (Q)ueer?

    one bonus of that scenario: you'd get to spend eternity pillaging and tormenting unlimited species for one reason: because you can.

  95. Trial: confirmed on Letterman by eracerblue · · Score: 1

    True, this is.

    ... as Gillian Anderson herself confirmed on Letterman a few weeks ago.

    The question: was it before or after she made out with David Letterman?!

  96. Bloody hell! by rweir · · Score: 1

    Thanks guys! First you spoiled the final season by telling me that the Lone Gunmen die, then, before I've even had a chance to see that friggin' episode, you tell me "er..no, not really", thus spoiling the final episode!

  97. Absolute Spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, after the last episode, krychek (however his name goes) is finally dead. It turns out that Mulder was being framed by the military for having killed krychek, who is a supersoldier (and can't be killed). So everybody busts Mulder out of a military prison before they lethal-inject him. Then, they find out something about the final date of aliens taking over the earth (earth:final conflict, or first wave?). Then krychek gets killed _DEAD_ and so does the CSM (gets the wrong end of a missile, and you see him do a disintegration act (remember the bad guy in indiana jones & the grail). Mulder and Scully & Friends all get away (no guarantees though... hehehe) Too bad I was too busy (yawn) reading about microcontrollers to actually _watch_ what was going on.

    Yaay, seems like they finally put this show out of our misery. Kinda reminds me of the family dog I had loved som much, but was kind of relieved once got put down, since she couldn't eat, sleep or move properly anymore. But hey, Dune is on the Space channel right now...

  98. And the Bush administration says... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    no one could have predicted the use of planes as missles.

    1. Re:And the Bush administration says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, not clear, I meant to mention that I read this in 1997!

    2. Re:And the Bush administration says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. I read a specific threat assessment in open source Middle Eastern media (Jordan Times, IIRC) in 96/97 referring specifically to the possibility of flying passenger aircraft into WTC. The reason I remember this so clearly is that I recall ridiculing this idea, saying that the WTC had been designed to take the impact of a passenger airliner. Would that I had been correct... :(

    3. Re:And the Bush administration says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well...that was when Clinton was in power. Just think...if we had three slots on a presidential ballot, then we could have the Lone Guneman as president right now!

  99. Lone gunmen actually super-soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is why the nerve gas did not kill them.

    Sorry for the spoiler...

  100. They are dead by ClubStew · · Score: 2

    After having watched the last episode, the Line Gunmen are dead, it was just visions Mulder was having, or perhaps the dead visiting him. Wasn't really sure which. Knowing the X-Files, probably the latter!

  101. Lone Gunmen were killed on 9-11 by uncoveror · · Score: 1

    The lone gunmen are dead. In order not to be seen as un-american, Chris Carter dropped them. In this current environment of jingoism and self worhip in the wake of 9-11, as we all grieve and try to heal our wounded souls, three geeks fighting government conspiracies are not politically correct. The first episode of their show was about government forces intending to crash a plan into the WTC, and blame it on terrorists, in order to bring back the military-industrial complex's cold war era profitability. Having seen that made 9-11 surreal! I could not believe that it actually had happened.To avoid giving conspiracy nuts ideas, Carter kicked our favorite conspiracy uncoverors to the curb. He doesn't want to be called to congress for the next round of Mcarthyite hearings when opportunistic politicians try to claim that there are pro-terrorist people in Hollywood.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    1. Re:Lone Gunmen were killed on 9-11 by geoswan · · Score: 2
      The lone gunmen are dead. In order not to be seen as un-american, Chris Carter dropped them.

      Somebody should mod this up.

  102. Re:Dude, this is the X-Files,... [SPOILERS] by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

    Dude, this is the X-Files, they don't need any reason to bring dead characters back.
    True, since the Final Ep has already shown in the US we now know that they were some of the 'dead' characters to come back in a halucination/waking dream to Mulder to give him advice. But the final Ep several times reminds us that super soldiers can't really be killed except with magnatite from certain meteors. And that Mulder's sister was cloned multiple times allowing for multiple deaths during the series of his sister, though we are told she actually dies in the 80's.

    The only thing good about that is that you get to see your least favourite characters die repeatedly.
    Of course we also know they did bring back CSM from the 'presumed dead' to actually and pretty much beyond doubt kill him since they show him melting in a bomb blast, and since he is in a cave where super-soldiers can't enter, we know they can't use that excuse for bringing him back. But it still leaves cloning.

    I hope they bring TLG back for the second film, it just would be the X-Files without them. As for CSM, let's hope that he is well and truly dead this time, though I hope to see the actor appear in other venues since he was a very good bad guy without being campy.

  103. Lone Gonemen were visions: finale stunk! by wessman · · Score: 1

    The Lone Gonemen and several other peeps were in the series finale as Mulder's visions.

    I liked how the finale brought a lot of things together, but the finale still left entirely too much unanswered, as if to say, "the X-Files will be back." But it won't.

    I'm not one of those people that goes around saying this sucked, that sucked, but this series finale was a complete waste of two hours for me.

  104. OK, it kind of sucked, but... by geoswan · · Score: 2
    Okay, the last episode kind of sucked, but does that mean we aren't interested in dissecting it?

    It had this explanation for the black oil. Life on Earth was seeded by meteorites from Mars. Well, this is an old idea, called Panspermia. You don't have to be a conspiracy nut to give it consideration.

    The Mars inoculation of life on Earth came with an "Alien Virus". Excuse me? If the inoculant for all life on Earth came from from Mars, and the virus is also from Mars, how is it any more alien than any other life on Earth?

  105. Re:Dude, this is the X-Files,... [SPOILERS] by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

    As for CSM, let's hope that he is well and truly dead this time, though I hope to see the actor appear in other venues since he was a very good bad guy without being campy.

    He (the actor, William B. Davis) was also a very good speaker when he came to the University of Lethbridge. Spoke on a variety of interesting subjects, most of them X-Files related somehow or another, was quite amusing, I took one of the arrow posters off the wall and had him sign it. Probably in the landfill now, but he was still pretty cool.

    Factoid: He's actually an ex-smoker. When he appeared on the first episode of the X-Files, the producers asked him if he wanted real cigarettes or the fake herbal ones. He figured he was cured of his addiction, and went for the real ones. After finding himself getting itchy for them when he got home, he decided that it was no more real ones for him, despite the fact that the herbal ones are truly putrid.

    --Dan