Slashdot Mirror


Segway HT Starts Selling

Ninja Master Gara writes "The much-hyped "IT", Dean Kamen's Segway Human Transporter, started selling Monday with a no-refund deposit of $495 on the $4,950 people mover for deliveries starting March 2003 on first come first serve basis. "The Segway Human Transporter is one of the most famous and anticipated product introductions of all time," Jeff Bezos, chief executive and founder of Amazon.com, said in heralding the availability of the vehicles on the online retailer's site." It's also the most overhyped and overpriced toy ever, and I'm kicking myself for posting it since that just contributes to the problem.

620 comments

  1. Let me see... by Dr+Thrustgood · · Score: 5, Funny

    I live in London, England, joyously enough.

    1) No room to drive any longer - cars are everywhere.
    2) No room to stand on the tube (subway) - people are everywhere.
    3) No room to stand on the mainline (overground) trains - people are everywhere.
    4) Segway is still useless.

    Looks like we'd better start bringing out the guns...

    1. Re:Let me see... by popeydotcom · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't worry. We won't see it for years.

      Although I did see them demoed at the Farnborough Air Show. Some promo for BAE who apparently made the gyros.

    2. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      You know, I lived Tokyo before and now live near London. I am tired of Londoners complaining that the tube is too crowded. Send them off to tokyo for a week and they'll shut up.

      Now, if they would only complete the damn work between King's Cross and Edgeware Road in a reasonable amount of time...

    3. Re:Let me see... by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't understand how proving there are places more crowded than London proves London isn't crowded. It is crowded, and the fact that Tokyo is even more so changes nothing. Just because there are dicks bigger than mine it doesn't mean I don't have a big dick. :-)

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    4. Re:Let me see... by Dr+Thrustgood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, but how much would I have to pay to travel in Tokyo? For the few miles I travel each day I have to pay £20/week.

      Actually, thinking about it, this Segway jobbie would only cost me, hrm, four year's public transport money. It *must* be value for money...

    5. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      "Although I did see them demoed at the Farnborough Air Show"

      Did they ride them non-stop for 36 hours from their US base, drive around a couple of times, then go home again like the B2?

    6. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like we'd better start bringing out the guns...
      You guys got pissed when the IRA tried to.

    7. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't understand how proving there are places more crowded than London proves London isn't crowded. It is crowded, and the fact that Tokyo is even more so changes nothing. Just because there are dicks bigger than mine it doesn't mean I don't have a big dick.

      Just because there are bigger dicks out there doesn't mean you aren't a big dick.

    8. Re:Let me see... by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1

      Of course, when i take WAGN in the afternoons, I ususally get a whole car to myself and nobody collects tickets. Fucking stupid British system.

    9. Re:Let me see... by operagost · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What guns? You live in England. Oops, I guess the cops and military have all those. Oh well, commence firing into the crowd. That's called "crowd control".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh well, commence firing into the crowd. That's called "crowd control".

      At least that's what Israel calls it, when they do it to Palestinians.

    11. Re:Let me see... by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Thank you for pointing out the perfect solution:

      Remove cars; replace with Segways.

      Now there's room for everyone.

    12. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admit it, you use water balloons as condoms.

    13. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To take my steering wheel you'd have to pry it from my cold, dead, fingers.

      Segways are urban curiousities. In rural areas, Segways are useless. And, how much winter weather testing have these things received? Imagine yourself walking up a steep sidewalk in a northern winter, only to look up and see one of these things sliding towards you with a screaming, white-knuckled yuppie in tow.

      If postal carriers think they are the target of too many rabid terriers on their delivery route now, just wait until they roll into the neighborhood with one of these Cujo magnets.

      Assuming they have lots of metal in them, how grounded are these things, electrically speaking? What if you're caught in a thunder storm on the way home from work? What are the economic and medical implications of hundreds of these human lightning rods zipping down the street? Or perhaps this is an opportunity to engineer a solution that could harness the power of lightning to recharge the Segway's batteries, while simultaneously curbing urban population growth! :)

    14. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oops, I guess the cops and military have all those

      Yup. Exactly like it should be. Or would you rather that the riff-raff (aka white trash) should also be trusted with lethal power like firearms?

    15. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At least that's what Israel calls it, when they do it to Palestinians.

      What do Palestinians call it when they blow up busloads of children and people in discos?

    16. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yup. Exactly like it should be. Or would you rather that the riff-raff (aka white trash) should also be trusted with lethal power like firearms?

      Of course not, afterall people are inherently stupid and can't be trusted with something complicated like a firearm. Yet, we'll let 16 year olds and 70+ year olds drive a 3500 pound vehicle at 70mph or more. More people die from traffic accidents than accidental shootings.

    17. Re:Let me see... by palutke · · Score: 2

      As long as it doesn't rain. Or you don't have to travel farther than one charge will carry you. Or you don't have a passenger or groceries to carry.

      --
      'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
    18. Re:Let me see... by Hawaiian+Lion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the key point that just about everyone I've seen posting so far is missing is this.

      The Segway was not developed primarily for the consumer.

      If you look through their website, they have already implemented the Segway mostly in industrial and commercial applications.

      They're only starting to sell the Segway to consumers now because this is the second phase of the project.

      Although the applications of the Segway in some communities as a personal mobility device may be limited, I doubt that we will fail to see it successfully implemented in various divisions of labor.

      AA

    19. Re:Let me see... by Deosyne · · Score: 1

      Its just posturing to cover up how these people want to feel that their otherwise mundane lives are more significant and exciting through association. Somehow by associating themselves with what they perceive to be greater hardship, they feel that they are superior people.

      Its the same reason why on 9/11/01 half of a nation of over 280 million people seemingly had some sort of personal connection to an attack that "only" (in terms of scale) killed 3,000. The post that you replied to, denouncing the original post of this thread for not being a severe enough example of crowding, is a perfect example of this rather bizarre phenomenon. The nice part about it is that it is incredibly easy to develop studies for. ;)

    20. Re:Let me see... by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Some nice objections. I sort of envision the Segway as a nice "last-mile link" to an even more active metro/train/bus system.

    21. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do Palestinians call it when they blow up busloads of children and people in discos?

      A good start.

    22. Re:Let me see... by Myco · · Score: 2

      I don't think that's accurate -- I think the industrial applications are just a good way of getting established, ramping up production, building a brand, etc. Kamen would definitely like to see a huge consumer market for these.

    23. Re:Let me see... by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

      I remember their press-releases at the time... They were deploying these things to large commercial users first (US Post Office, warehouses, etc.) because it gave them a more controlled environment in which to test and tweak. I'm glad they didn't just start cranking them out by the thousands and selling them at Walmart.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    24. Re:Let me see... by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Well, it can actually handle rain and groceries: umbrella and side bag attachments. The passenger thing is sort of silly anyway: duh. It's the length of the charge (and the price) that are the real stickers.

    25. Re:Let me see... by oziumjinx · · Score: 0

      Great! No longer do we have to exert any energy at all and walk anywhere. If this thing catches on we could see a dramatic rise in weight of the people using this Segway

    26. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your first paragraph was a point well made. I disagree with the 9/11 example though. I just read today about the oil spill in Spain... I have no personal affiliation with oil, spain, salt-water fish, etc., but still I gasped with sympathy. 9/11, to a larger extent, was not just about terrorists hurting NY and DC, but about hurting america, which it did. It rattled my cage. I didn't exploit it though to feel superior. I think you can have the former without the latter having to follow.

    27. Re:Let me see... by Hawaiian+Lion · · Score: 1

      Toss aside Kamen's visions for a moment and remember that he's still got financial backers to deal with, and they want a solid market to rely on. I think that most people have more faith in the Segway as an industrial tool than a commercial unit.

      Just my 0.02 though...

      AA

    28. Re:Let me see... by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2

      3a) Can't use it on the footpath, because the council/cable company/gas company dug it up a few months ago, put some cones around the hole and then forgot about it.

    29. Re:Let me see... by cakoose · · Score: 1

      More people die from traffic accidents than accidental shootings.

      Um, this may have to do with the fact that cars are driven in public more often than guns are shot in public. But, hey, if it doesn't support your argument, then common sense be damned, right?

    30. Re:Let me see... by nexthec · · Score: 1

      but it doesnt support that theory that the public should not have access to them

    31. Re:Let me see... by sfm · · Score: 1

      Okay, I just don't get it........

      What does a Segway give me that "standard" electric scooter doesn't?

      Speed - Segway seems on the low end here but either can have governors

      Weight - Segway is still on the heavy side for a comparable performance scooter

      Size - Maybe the Segway has a small benefit here at least in operating footprint. For storage, most scooters fold up and are smaller.

      Performance - If you don't have any balance, maybe the Segway has a benefit, otherwise the performance is poor at best (speed, battery life)

      Maneuverability - comparable ?

      Cost - Don't make me laugh

      One good thing that has come from all this hype, some laws are being changed to allow scooters on sidewalks (this HAS to be part of the Segway business plan). Hopefully some of us "normal" people can benefit from all this Segway legal effort.

      Just my $.02

    32. Re:Let me see... by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Anyone from LA can tell you that there is nothing like driving the 405. From Santa Barbara (where I live) it takes an hour and fifteen minutes or so to get to LA which is about 100 miles away. But once I get on the 405 it can take almost 2 hours to go 10 miles. Unfortunately the Segway really is useless, especially for places like LA becuase it is spread over a huge area. The segway would be useful for maybe a few cities around the world, like New York which is a big city in a little area. How does it fare on hills? would it be useful in San Francisco? Also has anyone thought of the fact that it is useless in poor whether, what if you live in Seattle? The Segway is really only hyped for 2 reasons:

      1) Dean Kamen hypes it so much himself.
      2) It was kept secret for a long time.

      -Kaplan

      P.S. does anyone else thing Ginger was a retarted code name?
      P.P.S does anyone think Segway is even worse?

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    33. Re:Let me see... by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      I, meanwhile, was rather surprised to discover that I had no real connection at all to the attacks. I wish I could've justified some of that "association"; maybe it would've helped me come up with some emotion suitable to the event. As it is, I began to suspect that this country is simply to big and too heterongenous to be properly susceptible to terrorist attacks.

      I think you'd have to be a very big, very powerful, very secret organization, in order to impact enough Americans quickly enough to really strike terror in the heart of the nation. And as far as I know, the only very big, very powerful, very secret organization capable of doing this is already running the country.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    34. Re:Let me see... by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 2

      I began to suspect that this country is simply to big and too heterongenous to be properly susceptible to terrorist attacks.

      You aren't really suggesting that it wasn't and isn't susceptible, are you? Please...

      I think you'd have to be a very big, very powerful, very secret organization, in order to impact enough Americans quickly enough to really strike terror in the heart of the nation. And as far as I know, the only very big, very powerful, very secret organization capable of doing this is already running the country.

      Your naïvety is touching. Impact americans? Strike terror? Remember the Anthrax? You guys were doing it in your trousers at the thought of opening mail, and the rest of the world (well, the rest of the western world) was watching and thinking "Hope we're not next". Things like that have already happened, and I genuinely believe they will happen again, in the US and elsewhere. An the terrorists will find better ways of terrifying us more - you can bet on it. I think the reality is that the memory of the average american (and indeed a great number of people in the "western world") we hear so much about is just too short to remember how scared many of them were a year ago. Why is that? (I don't know, but I would hazard a guess that the constant bombarding by sensationalist news channels has an impact). From a terrorist viewpoint this just makes it easy because the next time somebody with a grudge gets their hands on a bag of anthrax and starts mailing out free samples, the nation will be just as surprised as it was last time.

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    35. Re:Let me see... by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      "You guys", is it?

      You may not comprehend how huge the U.S. really is. Believe me, calling someone who lives 3,000 miles away, in what is culturally another country altogether, a "compatriot", or "fellow citizen" is a pretty weird experience. Blowing up buildings in New York has very little practical impact for over two thirds of the country. Seriously. Aside from the news coverage, and the sudden proliferation of flags and National Guardsmen, the West Coast was business as usual by the end of the day. I don't presume to understand the mindset of the UK, which is a nation roughly the size of my state. Why do you (wherever you live) presume to tell me what it's like to be an American?

      As far as the anthrax goes, neither I nor anybody else I know expressed any concern at all about it. You probably read the international edition of Time magazine, and promptly assumed that everybody here was in a panic about it. I'm here to tell you it's not like that at all.

      I never said that that U.S. is not susceptible to terrorist attacks--just that I suspect it's not susceptible. This suspicion is based largely on the problem of getting "Americans" in San Francisco to relate to or empathize with the problems of "Americans" in New York. You can't terrorize the west coast by bombing the east coast. They're just too far apart, geographically and culturally.

      So, um, like... fuck off. And stuff. Yeah...

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    36. Re:Let me see... by byron150 · · Score: 1

      Right the fuck on man!!!! I was in Korea when it happened, fucking military, but while being shocked at what had happened, I was rather more annoyed at the security precautions established to prevent copycats at my location. I felt bad for those people, but I wasn't crying my eyes out and at NO POINT was I scared to open mail. Maybe I'm totally desensitized to the violence that surrounds me in the world, or, then again, maybe I just don't give a shit about the teeming masses in New York whom certainly don't give a shit about me. I'm not upset by that, I just realize that when you have a country as large as ours, you cannot begin to care, or concern yourself with everyone else in the country. As it is we are usually fighting with each other anyways over this bullshit bill in congress or that bullshit new tax law. This whole fucking country is crap. I'm going to be slightly hypocritical in saying that it's crap that I LOVE but it's still crap. I still think I live in one of the best places in the entire world, but I think that more because of the area I grew up, the place that brings back the memories of my youth, and the dreams of my future. I have the time to do that because despite this country's government being a total piece of shit, it has given me the freedom to live my life in bumfuck wherever if I want to. So I guess the resulting point I'm trying to get across here is, if I'm going to cry about it, it would have to affect me on a level with which I share emotional attachment, none of which is tied to anything close to New York. If your going to unify America, you have to affect them emotionally, which means country wide, and good luck with that.

      --
      -Never believe in the end of something great, send it to sub-committee for further study!!! - ME
    37. Re:Let me see... by arantius · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine called this the bigger butthead principle. Even if you can prove someone else is a bigger butthead, it doesn't mean you're not one.

      --
      Health is simply dying at the slowest rate possible.
    38. Re:Let me see... by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Your naïvety is touching. Impact americans? Strike terror? Remember the Anthrax? You guys were doing it in your trousers at the thought of opening mail, and the rest of the world (well, the rest of the western world) was watching and thinking "Hope we're not next". Things like that have already happened, and I genuinely believe they will happen again, in the US and elsewhere.

      The anthrax attacks were almost certainly home-grown, just like the sniper attacks. Anyone with half a brain knew this at the time of the attacks. It was just a nut with a grudge who used 9/11 as a excuse.

      However Americans, as a whole, are hysterical. We tend to panic from everything (Y2K, drug war, 9/11, etc.), mainly due to the extremely sensationalist media who has a greate influence in the USA than in other countries.

      From a terrorist viewpoint this just makes it easy because the next time somebody with a grudge gets their hands on a bag of anthrax and starts mailing out free samples, the nation will be just as surprised as it was last time.

      Except that it is unlikely to happen again as the anthrax attacks were almost certainly the result of a home-grown mad bomber type (like the Unabomber). And the people the Muslim terrorists should worry about, US intelligence, have very LONG memories and are totally ruthless.

    39. Re:Let me see... by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Um, this may have to do with the fact that cars are driven in public more often than guns are shot in public. But, hey, if it doesn't support your argument, then common sense be damned, right?

      Firearms are extermely common in the USA, over 300 million in circulation I'm told. From that I would bet that the number of firearm discharges (rounds fired) possibly outnumbers the amount of "driving incidents" every day. I think the numbers are at least comparable. Given that, the number of accidental firearms deaths is probably relatively low, given the number of firearm discharages.

      Most fatal firearms accidents do not take place "in public". They usually happen in, or nearby, the home and are the result of mishandling a loaded firearm causing it to discharge.

      Given the number of firearms in circulation (300 million) it is unlikely that even an immeadate total ban on firearms (remember that the statistics you see typically include police and military deaths) would solve the problem. OTOH, gun safety programs run by organizations like the NRA are PROVEN to reduce accidental firearm injury and death.

      So if you really want to prevent accidental gun deaths, you should promote their safety programs. Particularly the Eddie Eagle program for children.

  2. How does it work? by Yuioup · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Has anybody figured out how it works?

    1. Re:How does it work? by Yuioup · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:How does it work? by TamMan2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      How did this get labeled off topic? Anyway, I think it is relevant, so...

      It has gyroscopes inside so it can tell what it's orientation is, when the rider leans in any direction he applies a torque to the machine using his weight. This torque is the control input for the vehicle, and onboard computer translates that into different voltages for the two motors (one on each side). The same computers (with the gyroscopes, again) makes sure the machine 'keeps it's balance'. It is really an overpriced simple control system with a couple motors and some gyros...

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    3. Re:How does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably one gyro and one accelerometer, since it's basically a 1-D IMU. Gyros drift over time, so you use an accelerometer to correct over the long term. Accelerometers can't measure the short term movements (can't remember why offhand though), so you need both. The mailing list archives at autopilot.sourceforge.net have lots of very informative beginner level discussion of inertial measurement.

      And, yes it is overpriced. The autopilot guys have built a 3-axis IMU which can fly a model helicopter for less than $500

    4. Re:How does it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a Segway in the office, actually have a couple of them here.

      The Segway rocks, it is so much better than it looks.

      I have ridden it outside on the sidewalk over speed bumps, etc.

      Never had a problem. They spent tons of money and time developing the unit and have solved most problems.

      I have seen the "testing" videos and seen the Segeway go over the bumps and uneven terrain without no problems.

      If you get a chance make sure you test it out.

      H.

    5. Re:How does it work? by Yuioup · · Score: 1

      Okay alright. I suck. Mod me down on my next comment. I couldn't resist the temptation.

  3. Maybe when the price comes down... by pdboddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll go out and watch yet another way motorists can take you out...

    --
    Julie Moult is an idiot.
    1. Re:Maybe when the price comes down... by pdboddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How the heck is this off topic?

      Motorists already give cyclists a hell of a time, and I know I can pedal my mountain bike around faster than a Segway can go.

      Do people seriously think these things will be safe, whether they are on the road or the sidewalk?

      Yeesh, what's wrong with putting one foot in front of the other and walking?

      --
      Julie Moult is an idiot.
    2. Re:Maybe when the price comes down... by HedRat · · Score: 1

      Anybody care to venture a guess as to how long it will be before we see Johnny Knoxville jumping off a balcony into a fountain on one of these? The article doesn't go into great detail about the "rigorous testing" that was done but whatever the cost was, they could have saved plenty by just giving a couple to Jackass.

    3. Re:Maybe when the price comes down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not safe anywhere. There's risks involved in everything you do.

    4. Re:Maybe when the price comes down... by Myco · · Score: 2
      Can you comfortably walk 12 MPH for, say, three miles to a restaurant you like, have enough time to eat, and walk back again, all on your lunch break?

      It's faster than walking. Sure, you might replace some of your walking with it, but you'll also be able to do things you weren't able to do before, and that's a win.

  4. C5 by Anonymous+MadCoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's see how much better it sells than the C5...

    1. Re:C5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Sinclair Cwhatnow?

      Although it placed your head at bumper height, at least Clive's machine had a reasonably cool name from a good line (C4 anyone?), Segway reminds me of soap or something - I swear a guy came to our house and extolled the vitues of Segway's cleaning products. Someone correct me if I'm wrong...

      Anyway, C5... Segway... either way when the batteries farked, you have deadweight to carry home.

    2. Re:C5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C5? You mean the latest model Corvette?

    3. Re:C5 by CommieBozo · · Score: 0
      Segway: $5000, top speed: 12.5 mph, image: Helmet-wearing laze

      C5: $50,000, top speed: 180 mph, image: C5 owner

      The C5 looks like the winner!

    4. Re:C5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One would expect that the crowd that claims to be "ners" know their history.... Ah well nowaday nerds never heard of Clive Sinclair. What's this world comming to?????

    5. Re:C5 by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well surely it will sell better than the C4, which kept blowing up it's occupants.

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    6. Re:C5 by byolinux · · Score: 1

      On the subject of the C5, it's interesting to note that the name comes from the ZX Spectrum opcode for PUSH BC, which apparently Clive Sinclair thought looked like "Pushbike" (a typical British phrase for a non motorised bike)

    7. Re:C5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I wanted to say that! Z80 rulez!

  5. I agree completely by TamMan2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's also the most overhyped and overpriced toy ever, and I'm kicking myself for posting it since that just contributes to the problem.

    Why did you post it then?

    Really though, if you want to get around in areas that a car is not practical, use a bicycle, or walk, and get some exercise while you're at it...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:I agree completely by tanveer1979 · · Score: 1, Redundant
      It's also the most overhyped and overpriced toy ever, and I'm kicking myself for posting it since that just contributes to the problem.
      Why did you post it then?

      Lemme guess,... slow news day

      --
      My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
      FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    2. Re:I agree completely by WalterSobchak · · Score: 1

      Third left...
      My contribution to Segway hype.

      But seriously, I saw them in action and they _are_ way cool. The pricetag however makes me not want to own one.

      Alex

      --
      Absinthe makes the heart grow fonder
    3. Re:I agree completely by doozer_ex_machina · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love this mobility-centric attitude. While I am failry able bodied, I can't cycle habitually, as I have a problem with my knees that cycling exacerbates. Others with more (or in other words, actual) mobility problems could benefit greatly from this kind of device.

    4. Re:I agree completely by hephaist0s · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree that they're overpriced (at least for now), but I live in Manchester, NH, where Segway is headquartered and we see people using them every day - all Segway employees, but still, it seems like a great way to get around town. Also, rode one last year and it was neat as all hell.

    5. Re:I agree completely by malarkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He wouldn't have had to post it. I posted it earlier, but it was rejected.

      2002-11-14 00:16:01 Opera 7, beta 1 for Windows released (articles,news) (rejected)
      2002-11-18 14:56:49 Order your Segway now!! (articles,news) (rejected)

    6. Re:I agree completely by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 3, Flamebait


      Why did you post it then?

      Two words: Paid advertising.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    7. Re:I agree completely by G-funk · · Score: 2

      I may be the only one, but I'm glad the segway is finally being sold.... Sure, at 3 months wages (.au), it's a joke.. but the prices will drop as toy-loving-high-income-it's-no-fair-everybody-has- a-mobile-now dickheads buy them, the price will drop...

      For AU$900, the price of one of those dicky scooters, the segway would be a fairly grouse thing to have to zip around in when you just can't be fucked walking, since it'll go places your car won't.

      The only problem is some cunt in a ute (read:pickup) will just come along, load it up, and presto- free segway!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    8. Re:I agree completely by excaliburdj · · Score: 1

      As far as I understand it, the keys for these things are unique. They control the speed, for one, and also will only operate one of the HT devices.

      So this isn't really a valid point. You steal one and what do you do with it? It sits there because you don't have the key to run it. So what do you do? You call Segway and say, "Hey. I have an HT with serial number 12345" and they say, "OK...give me your info...wait...you're not the owner of this HT."

      You don't think the sellers of the thing will keep records of who owns them even if the government doesn't? They'll need to be able to track these things provided you ever need replacement parts.....and to send you the new Segway catalog every year ;-)

    9. Re:I agree completely by Jeremi · · Score: 2
      The only problem is some cunt in a ute (read:pickup) will just come along, load it up, and presto- free segway!


      Well, to be accurate, free useless segway, since they won't have the electronic key necessary to start the thing up.


      I wonder how hard it is to hot-wire a Segway?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:I agree completely by Anitra · · Score: 1

      On one hand, I'm glad it's being sold to the public.

      On the other hand, if I had $4k+, I would be able to afford a CAR (which is certainly a higher priority, for me at least).

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    11. Re:I agree completely by rtstyk · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree.

      If you're going to post it, don't try to justify the fact that you think it might be bad to post it by saying that you shouldn't be posting it.

      If you weren't going to post you wouldn't post it. Writing that you're kicking yourself is useless. Who cares. If you didn't want to contribute to the problem you wouldn't post it.

      The way you make it sound is as if you posted it before and now you're kicking yourself for doing it where actually you still haven't yet posted it and you already wrote that you're kicking youreself for posting it. What sense does that make?

      whew

      --
      I hate the fact that you people don't salute me
    12. Re:I agree completely by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

      oddly enough this security has not yet appeared in mobilephones, or cars, or house locks, or laptop computers.

      which does lead one to wonder if it's all that good.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    13. Re:I agree completely by G-funk · · Score: 2

      As a slashdot reader, you should know, _every_ security can be beaten.... If the segay is popular enough, Mario's cousin spiro who chops cars will be able to make a new key for it.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    14. Re:I agree completely by mino · · Score: 1
      2002-11-18 14:56:49 Order your Segway now!! (articles,news) (rejected)

      Anyone who uses more than one exclamation mark in a single sentence deserves to have one of two things happen to them:

      • To be beaten to death with a fence paling
      • To have their submission rejected

      Personally, I'd say you got off pretty lightly.

  6. I don't care how silly it looks.... by solostring · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .... I WANT ONE! :)

    It will be interesting to see how popular this will become over the next few years (and subsequent price drops). Remember when push-scooters first started to become fashionable? People looked on at the owners, and thought "What a ridiculous concept".... Switch to today, and there are many businessmen using this mode of transport to get around the city (at least in Paris).

    Do you think that the same will happen to the Segway?.... Time will tell....

    1. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      at least in Paris

      Yeh, but that's France. Businessmen are expected to look gay as hell.

    2. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your parent was just lying. I hardly ever see that here in Paris. Most common are failed IT dropouts on in-line skates. Wearing GNU/Hippy T-shirts with fuzzy hair and silly little beards.

    3. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by Directrix1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, because while scooters looked stupid (and still do), the segway just looks gay as hell.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    4. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by melonman · · Score: 2

      Remember when push-scooters first started to become fashionable?

      I first saw one in Vienna, and thought it was really neat. Almost bought one to take home with me. Glad I didn't, because once every kid on the block had one they moved from 'really neat' to 'really sad'. In the same way, this electric beer keg thing is only going to remain desirable as long as no-one actually buys one. And maybe not that long.

      --
      Virtually serving coffee
    5. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by pgilman · · Score: 1

      "Remember when push-scooters first started to become fashionable?"

      yes, fondly. it was in the mid '60s. or did you think scooters had been invented in the '90s?

      my point is that things go in and out of fashion. ten years from now scooters will be "uncool" again; then, around 2030 or so, there'll be '90s or '00s nostalgia, and then it'll be YOUR turn to post a cranky reply to some snot-nosed kid.

      and as far as "segway" goes: i also remember hula-hoops...

      --
      if i'm a grammar nazi, you're an illiteracy nazi.
    6. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      Remember when push-scooters first started to become fashionable? People looked on at the owners, and thought "What a ridiculous concept".... Switch to today, and there are many businessmen using this mode of transport to get around the city (at least in Paris).

      Perhaps. But they still look like total wankers!

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    7. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by prell · · Score: 1

      It will be interesting to see how popular this will become over the next few years (and subsequent price drops). Remember when push-scooters first started to become fashionable? People looked on at the owners, and thought "What a ridiculous concept"

      yea, remember when those five thousand dollar scooters came out? and everbody said "wow, what a practical, affordable toy."? and when I say "everyone" I mean children and people who work for microsoft (this isnt flaming - for some reason everyone has a scooter.. and a porsche, it seems).

    8. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by Turbyne · · Score: 1
      there are many businessmen using this mode of transport to get around the city (at least in Paris).
      [Insert crack at the French]
      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    9. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by Jack+Auf · · Score: 1

      Why? I bought a cheap Chinese electric scooter for $125 that has a range of 17mi per charge, a top speed of 12mph, and is only about 15lbs. And I can fold it up into a sholder bag and walk away with it.

      Why buy one of these heavy, big, overpriced monsters when you can get something with similar capabilities for less money?

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
    10. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      You're a Mac user, aren't you? ;)

    11. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      ok, I want one too!

      where'd you get yours from?

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    12. Re:I don't care how silly it looks.... by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      genuine response to the comment and i get modded down, nice work.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  7. Wish it were a unicycle by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was disappointed that it wasn't a unicycle. Imagine a seat on a wheel that moves and swivels to keep directly underneath you. Sort of like a magic one legged stool.

    And I was also disappointed that it didn't go faster. If it can balance, why not make it go 50 miles an hour?

    --
    This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    1. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because it doesn't repeal the laws of physics. If you hit a ledge or large gravel going 50 mph, you will face plant into the pavement, gyro or no gyro.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by Joe+U · · Score: 5, Funny

      "If it can balance, why not make it go 50 miles an hour?"

      Because it's bad enough that you can get a bicycle up over 25mph on a city street. The average user would rocket down Broadway at 50, mowing thru about ten pedestrians before sliding under a cab.

      Granted, you could easily start up a reality TV show based on this. How about "Segway Survivor" or "World's stupidest police chases"?

    3. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by vofka · · Score: 1

      If it can balance, why not make it go 50 miles an hour?

      In the UK at least (IIRC anyway, too lazy to go look it up!), 15mph is the maximum speed at which a powered vehicle can travel before its owner is liable to pay road tax.

      --
      Disclaimer: I meant what I thought, not what I wrote! What? You can't read my Mind? Oh dear!
    4. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by llamalicious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hehe. I'm with you. But the reason your looking for, to not go 50mph on a segway, is called "deceleration trauma."
      aka: the Sudden Stop

      'nuff said.

    5. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      I would ride it on the road. It's be damn cool to ride my 50 MPH unicycle on the road to work, then pick the thing up and stick it in a corner of my cube for the day.

      Or if it's self-balancing I could just use it like a chair.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    6. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      Screw the UK - I live in Amerka. The limit isn't 15 MPH, rather, it's 3 tons. I can have a 50 MPH Segway here, and I can drive it in the passing lane with my hat on.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    7. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tough one. On one hand, the world would be a better place if more idiots slalomed around at 50mph on a wheeled stick. But on the other hand, the mfg loses repeat business.

    8. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by gravelpup · · Score: 1
      I was disappointed that it wasn't a unicycle. Imagine a seat on a wheel that moves and swivels to keep directly underneath you. Sort of like a magic one legged stool.

      Then it + you would be too bulky to ride on a sidewalk along with normal pedestrians.

      And I was also disappointed that it didn't go faster. If it can balance, why not make it go 50 miles an hour?

      The point is to get people get out of cars for dumb short trips, not to replace the car (or replace walking, for that matter).

      --

      Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.

    9. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Again, just because it's self balancing doesn't mean you cannot crash.

    10. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you hit a ledge or large gravel going 50 mph

      I believe that's called a gravlette.

    11. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The limit isn't 15 MPH, rather, it's 3 tons.

      Isn't that about the combined weight of the average american on one of these things anyway?

    12. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by Myco · · Score: 4, Funny
      Sounds like the next hit computer game:

      GTA3: Vice Segway

      Oh yeah, I went there.

    13. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      If it can balance, why not make it go 50 miles an hour?

      Duh, where would you put the whale tale and type r sticker? No point on having it going 50mph if you can't look like you're going 50 at a red light.

    14. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just can't wait to hear about the first asshole to get a DWI on one.

    15. Re:Wish it were a unicycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish they could make a magic one legged bar stool. After a lot of beers and shots when everything starts swaying about it could automatically gyro stabilise me.

  8. Trouble... by e8johan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you've ever been to Italy and seen the way they handle their Vespas, and where they try to drive them knows that "Seven mostly rural states have no prohibitions on the use of powered vehicles on sidewalks." could mean trouble.

    Except from that, I think that it is nice to see that this actually became a product (or looks close to becoming). I doubted it earlier.

  9. How long? by BrK · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long will it be until we see urban kiddies with mis-matched kustom wheels and unpainted ground effects on these things? (oh yeah, and don't forget the obligatory NOS and MOMO stickers)

    At least you won't hear any annoying exhaust systems that sound like a beehive in blender with these, due to the electric drivetrain.

    --
    -This sig intentionally left blank
    1. Re:How long? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      At least you won't hear any annoying exhaust systems that sound like a beehive in blender with these, due to the electric drivetrain.

      How long before you see 'em with playing cards clothespinned to the deck, to make "motorcycle noises" when hit by the mag spokes?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:How long? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      How long will it be until we see urban kiddies with mis-matched kustom wheels and unpainted ground effects on these things?

      Somebody also needs to find a way to lower the thing and add hydraulics to the suspension. A low-rider Segway anybody?

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    3. Re:How long? by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny
      Segway Type R.

      If on the west coast, wheels must be set six inches outside the fenders.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:How long? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1
      Somebody also needs to find a way to lower the thing and add hydraulics to the suspension.

      Cool, then we can bounce up and down like a '59 Chevy, and have a.......$5000 pogo stick!

    5. Re:How long? by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is there a knobby tire version for walking on trails?

      Contractor version with a big tool box on the back, and mudflaps with the chrome lady?

      Yellow going to school versions?

      Will the Army get cammo paint schemes?

      Does the French Police version have that different siren sound?

      I'm out of time, others can continue the list...

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    6. Re:How long? by prell · · Score: 1

      ironically, the segway costs as much as a used civic (and, if you haggle, a glass pack). dont forget the carbon fiber handlegrips! +$500 and comes with free amazon.com chaps and spurs.

    7. Re:How long? by BrK · · Score: 1

      I like the 2 (so far) "Overrated" moderations of this. Seems like I offended some moderators with unpainted ground effects on their cars.

      Don't worry, just add more stickers and your car will go faster!

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    8. Re:How long? by BrK · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you drive a Civic on the sidewalk you're more likely to get a ticket (in some states more than others).

      I've always wished I could clip along on the sidewalks at 20MPH.

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    9. Re:How long? by ashitaka · · Score: 2

      You're showing your age.

      Any kid doing that nowadays would be laughed off the street.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    10. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean this?

    11. Re:How long? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Any kid doing that nowadays would be laughed off the street.

      Well, any kid who laughs at you for putting playing cards on your bike isn't your friend.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  10. Ah fantastic! by Dr+Thrustgood · · Score: 0, Troll

    So not only is the segway utterly useless but our main defence contractor is actively shouting about saying "Woo! Yay! Hoopla! *We* did this!"

    And they wonder why people think England's going down the pan...

    1. Re:Ah fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better not ask /., everyone here will tell you it's GWB's fault..

  11. eh? by RobertTaylor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    5 Grand? Buy a car.

    1. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy 5 bikes and do something for your health.
      For the distances the Segway is targeted, you'll be faster than a car.

      Not not mention that, it'll save you taxes, insurance, petrol. I won't get started with the enviromental effects.

    2. Re:eh? by vofka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some people cannot legally drive a car for various reasons (usually medical - I'm not talking about having had your licence revoked!), either that or they have absolutely no desire to drive a car.

      Some of those who cannot drive a car are not capable of riding a bicycle either, for example because they do not have a sufficient sense of balance.

      For these people, the Segway could be a viable alternative for "Faster than Foot" transportation - if only it were a little cheaper!

      --
      Disclaimer: I meant what I thought, not what I wrote! What? You can't read my Mind? Oh dear!
    3. Re:eh? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      for example because they do not have a sufficient sense of balance.

      Wouldn't a poor sense of balance also cause problems controlling a Segway?

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    4. Re:eh? by vidarh · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. The Segway balances itself. All you need to do is hold on to the handlebars and lean forwards to accelerate, or move your hands to turn.

    5. Re:eh? by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lean forward how much? This in itself will require a sense of balance. Without one you will be speeding up and slowing down all of the time.

      Its not going to balance for you, but will take your balance queues and turn them into motion. If you are not giving the proper queues then like an earlier poster suggested...

      mow through 10 pedestrains and end up under a cab.

    6. Re:eh? by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no kidding. Five grand gets a decent used car. If it's the size of the damn thing that makes it so cool, five grand will get you a very decent used motorcycle or a half decent new one. If you absolutely must drive it on the sidewalk then get one of those little foldable scooters that kids are running around with. Some of them are motorized. Hell, if it's the laziness factor that kicks so much ass about these things, then why stand? Get a comparibly-priced normal scooter or an electric wheelchair. People will still laugh at you, but maybe less if you use it all the time and refrain from rollerblading in public.

    7. Re:eh? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Lean forward how much? This in itself will require a sense of balance. Without one you will be speeding up and slowing down all of the time.

      Thank you. That was exactly the point I was trying to make. I guess I should have been more explicit instead of relying on implication.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  12. Really interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think personally it could be pretty cool. A vehicle that can move you along at about 15 mph without making you sweat while in a suit and tie...or whetever work clothing you are wearing. The major drawback of the thing is the weather...but hey...cars suck in snow and rain too...
    Sign me up for one when they break the $1500 price range...

    1. Re:Really interesting... by Heem · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A vehicle that can move you along at about 15 mph without making you sweat while in a suit and tie...or whetever work clothing you are wearing.

      So what do you do with this thing when you get to work? Are they going to have a parking lot for them? Ride it into the office? Will the HR department enforce a 2mph speed limit in the hallway? Will part of your pay be the electricity to recharge your unit on the company electric circuit?

      (imagine your favorite HR person standing in the hall of your office with a radar gun.) ha.

      --
      Don't Tread on Me
    2. Re:Really interesting... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      Plenty of workplaces have a room or area set aside for commuter bikes. Those that don't should. Encouraging fewer cars on the road is a good thing.

    3. Re:Really interesting... by homer_ca · · Score: 2

      Is $400 cheap enough for you? These electric scooters have the same range and speed and fold up smaller. The only coup of the Segway is that its creators lobbied hard to get this thing allowed on sidewalks. A lot of people mentioned bicycles and we could sure use the exercise, but sometimes you don't want to arrive all hot and sweaty, and very few cities have safe bike paths along commute routes.

    4. Re:Really interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thing is only practical in an urban area like New York City. You think _any_ companies have space set aside for bikes in Manhattan? Well, they don't.

  13. $4950!? by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember, many years ago, there was a similar device. It promised to revolutionise transport in ourt crowded infrastructure. It cost about £400 ($800 or so at the time), could be driven by anyone, was efficient, and affordable.

    It was called the Sinclair C5 and it was a complete failure.

    The Segway is almost the same, except it has a price tag high large enough to buy a cheap used car, and looks even more stupid.

    1. Re:$4950!? by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Any relation to the ZX80?

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    2. Re:$4950!? by biglig2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, the C5 was touted as a car/bicycle replacement, which it failed as because it is so low to the ground that driving it in traffic was terrifying. The segway is a walking replacement, and so has a better chance.

      Anyhow, there has to be an early adopter on all nifty technology.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    3. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous+MadCoe · · Score: 1

      Yes!
      It was Sir Clive's attempt to revolutionise traffic.

    4. Re:$4950!? by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 2

      It also had, IIRC, for no apparent reason, the handlebars underneath the "driver's" knees. I never did get that bit...

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    5. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe people are comparing the C5 to the Segway. There is a vast difference. The only thing they have in common are that they are a form of transport for one person and were electrically powered. Otherwise you may as well say that a golf cart and an electric dragster are the same.
      Similarly, bikes are very different to segways. Certainly different enought to warrant the existance of both.

    6. Re:$4950!? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The only thing they have in common are that they are a form of transport for one person and were electrically powered.

      Which is pretty much how both of these were marketed. So what are the key differences? The control method, the driver position, and the price. The driving position may be a help, but there's still a large "why bother" factor.

    7. Re:$4950!? by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      The only thin revolutionary about the Segway is that someone has found a way to create a gadget that does what a scateboard/scooter does(price $25), isn't as fast as a bicycle, and is priced like a motorcycle.

      I'm looking forward to a segway scooter chase seen in the next action movie spoof that hollywood cranks out... It will rank right up there with the 60's style "peoplemover" chase in austin powers for visual stupidity.

      $G

      --
      -- $G
    8. Re:$4950!? by will_die · · Score: 2

      Yes they are really over priced.
      Did provide a good laugh when on CNN headline news they could not run all over the set because they had problem getting over the cords.
      If I really wanted to make easy walking I would go with a Solex http://www.cybernex.net.au/clubs/cccv/reports/sole x.html Cheaper, more distance, faster, and if you want or run out of power you can still use the pedals of the bicycle.

    9. Re:$4950!? by Shalda · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For the money, I'd rather have a Yamaha Zuma, (MSRP $1699). (or Honda or Suzuki equivilent) Plus, it runs on gasoline so I don't have to plug it in for 8 hours to recharge it. I can just pull up to any service station and get another 100+ miles for $2.

      So let's recap:
      Segway HT: Range 10-15 miles. Top speed 15 mph. Must find electrical outlet to recharge with. Cost - 5,000.
      Gasoline Scooter: Range - 100+ miles, easily refilled with gas. Cost - 1,700.
      Bicycle: Range: variable. Fuel: biomass. Cost - $200.

      Strange, the less it costs, the more sense it makes.

    10. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why Bother?"

      Fuel prices, and The Environment - that's why.

      Guess what? Most of the World doesn't have large supplies of oil, and some even give a toss about their environment - more so that just dollars. Lower pollution and less emissions means something to some of us.

      And btw, most countries don't invade other countries to get more. Did you know that if the US gets control of Iraqi Oil via "The War On Terrorism", it will effectively half the cost per barrel to the US? Funny isn't it, how they don't want to invade/inspect North Korea, who will be Nuclear capable "Real Soon Now".

      Keep on driving those bag-ass SUVs and "Full Size" cars, fellas. Gotta keep the machine working...

      And while you're filling your gas tank - remember, the American Way Of Life is Not Negotiable!

    11. Re:$4950!? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Guess what? Most of the World doesn't have large supplies of oil

      Yeah, but these countries have abundant electricity, and they really can afford a $5000 machine.

      and some even give a toss about their environment

      A battery poerwed machine is far less environmentally friendly than a bike. Less practical as well. Probably get fewer overall emmsiions from a motor scooter.

      Funny isn't it, how they don't want to invade/inspect North Korea,

      And this has nothing at all to do with China getting pissed if they get too close.

      Keep on driving those bag-ass SUVs and "Full Size" cars, fellas. Gotta keep the machine working...

      Why? What the hell is wrong with a fuel efficient LPG car? Did I misread what I wrote? Did I say "Don't get a Segway, get an SUV? No, I said that a cheap car would be a better investment. Yes, it is less environmentally friendly. Get a bike. A folding one you can take on a bus or a train.

    12. Re:$4950!? by TGK · · Score: 2

      Why are people so clueless.

      Were do you think electricity comes from? Check this page for a hint.

      A Segway will be running, mostly on coal power. Now what do you think burns cleaner, gasoline or coal? Electrical vehicals are a load of crap until we develop a cleaner way to provide electricity in bulk.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    13. Re:$4950!? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      The perfect solution! Run the power plants on 130 octane racing gas :)

    14. Re:$4950!? by DrXym · · Score: 2
      Does it have a better chance? No one in America walks (hence the reason for so many fat people) and the few that do actually walk aren't suddenly going to purchase one because A) they can't afford the hugely, disproportionate price, B) they know they'd look an utter dork riding it, C) they actually appreciate the health benefits of walking, D) they recognise how utterly impractical these things are.


      I can appreciate that it might have applications in a large warehouse or an oil tanker or something of that nature, but in real life it is just a large, cumbersome nuisance and menace to other pedestrians, not to mention a very tempting target for thieves and vandals.


      If the purpose is to get from A to B more rapidly, then a bicycle does a better job and has the added advantage that it retails for a twentieth the price and gets you fit in the process.


      The Segway is doomed in its current incarnation, at least for the general public.

    15. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, my electricity comes from Hydro generators. If you missed the feel of the post, I'm not in the US.

    16. Re:$4950!? by Scyber · · Score: 1

      If the purpose is to get from A to B more rapidly, then a bicycle does a better job and has the added advantage that it retails for a twentieth the price and gets you fit in the process. Yeah but if you have ever tried to use a bike on a crowded sidewalk you would know why they are sometimes a pain in urban areas. The footprint of a person on a bike is much bigger than a person walking (or in this case a person on a segway). And that footprint increases when you stop because you have to balance yourself. Also don't forget that taking a bike to work while wearing a suit in Summer isn't exactly the best idea either. Unless you feel like scaring away your co-workers with your stank. While I agreee that bikes are better for your health and often times a better overall choice, the segway does have its benefits. Though at the current cost the cost/benefit ration is well in the bikes favor. When/if the segway ever hits $1000, then it will be much more practical.

    17. Re:$4950!? by ProlificSage · · Score: 1
      Yes, the price is high. For now. As pointed out by other posters, the price will eventually drop if the market is there.

      I can see a market for this device for people like myself, who live in the retail district of a city with no subway system and really busy streets around the holidays. A bus or cab is useless, they still have to wait in traffic. My area is so busy, Domino's won't deliver to my apartment between Thanksgiving and New Year's. I could potentially hop on a Segway to get to work, and not worry about being sweaty from a bike ride when I get there in addition to not having to fight traffic to get there.

      As far as theft is concerned, I would keep the Segway in my office. I doubt I'd use a $5000 (USD) Segway to go to the mall with. Still need the trunk room of a car for that.

      I can see at least one potential use for the Segway for me, which is why I originally put myself on Amazon's early distribution list. However, my income isn't disposable enough to spend 5 grand on one. I'll fight the traffic for now, but if the price dips below $2000, I'd seriously consider purchasing a Segway.

      --
      Real software engineers regret the existence of COBOL, FORTRAN and BASIC.
    18. Re:$4950!? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Wow! which country has 100% of its power produced by HEP?

    19. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but if you have ever tried to use a bike on a crowded sidewalk

      Cycle on the road, you moron!

      Also don't forget that taking a bike to work while wearing a suit in Summer isn't exactly the best idea either.
      ...shower and change at work.

    20. Re:$4950!? by DrXym · · Score: 2
      And using a Segway on a crowded sidewalk is any better? Or will using one cause even more crowding as well as putting you at the receiving end of a lot of dirty looks and abuse.


      As for using the Segway in the summer... If it's such a lovely day, what's the problem in just walking, or taking a leisurely cycle? I don't believe the Segway is going to be a hit at any price, short of bargain basement. It is simply not practical on any level.

    21. Re:$4950!? by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      For the money, I'd rather have a big screen TV :) I already have a bike and if the distance is too short to bike I'll walk. Seriously, these things look goofy and cost too much, and I'm not sure who would use these things besides the terminally lazy. Walking is GOOD for you. If it's too far to walk, you won't be walking anyway, now will you? So what's the purpose of a replacement for walking?

    22. Re:$4950!? by benzapp · · Score: 1

      No, but some european countries like France get virtually all their electricity from nuclear power, which is the cleanest source of energy around.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    23. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How do you plan to get that big screen TV home? :)

      Perfect example of what cars are good for.

    24. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, once you shower in a non-private restroom sink there's no going back. Might as well be homeless.

    25. Re:$4950!? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Assuming you mean that radioactive waste is clean.

      True in terms of CO2 emissions. False in terms of useless and chemically and radioactively toxic byproducts.

    26. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atlantis?

    27. Re:$4950!? by N1KO · · Score: 1

      Using a segway thingy to carry a 50+" tv sounds like an interesting idea.

    28. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Segway HT: Range 10-15 miles. Top speed 15 mph. Must find electrical outlet to recharge with. Cost - 5,000.
      Gasoline Scooter: Range - 100+ miles, easily refilled with gas. Cost - 1,700.
      Bicycle: Range: variable. Fuel: biomass. Cost - $200.


      Decent bicycle: $500
      Good bicycle: $2000
      Excellent bicycle: $5000
    29. Re:$4950!? by Fjord · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a lot easier to get a coal plant to upgrade/maintain emmissions control equipment than to get a million cars to upgrade their catylitic converters. Even if it is worse for the environment now, centralizing where the power comes from does make sense.

      --
      -no broken link
    30. Re:$4950!? by Tassach · · Score: 2

      Actually, even considering the spent fuel, Nuclear power is still greener than coal. Burning an equivilent amount of coal releases more radioactive material into the enviornment than a reactor would to produce the same amount of power. Which is better for the planet: thousands of tons of soot, CO, and SO2, or a few thousand pounds of depleted Uranium? Yes, spent nuke fuel is incredibly nasty stuff: but it's *highly concentrated* nasty stuff, making it ultimately easier to deal with

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    31. Re:$4950!? by dildatron · · Score: 2

      You are stupid. No, ignorant. It is MUCH more efficient to generate power at a power plant than under the hood of your car. It would be cleaner to generate all the power in one place.

      Modern coal plants are not that dirty, they are much cleaner than every car/truck/lawnmower/bus/train/etc having their own power plant.

      This is a FACT. it is you that are clueless.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    32. Re:$4950!? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Surely concentrations are the problem. Carbon contains a certain percentage of radioactive isotopes anyway, but releasing it doesn't substantially increase background radiation levels. We may be releasing it, but it was already radioactive.

      A nuclear power station will actually make things that were not already radioactive into nuclear waste. It's not just spent fuel, but worker's clothing and replaced components. And its certainly not cleaner than hydro electric.

      I'd rather have neither, but realise that they're probably a neccesary evil.

    33. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you could gold plate a segway and get the price up to $50,000 too - and it would make about as much sense as spending $5,000 on a bicycle.

    34. Re:$4950!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that guy probably spent several hundred on a faggotty little spandex suit to wear on his bike too. And I betcha he's the type of asshole who rides down the middle of the lane, going up hill, on a windy, 2 lane road.

    35. Re:$4950!? by jduckworth · · Score: 1

      yes exactly why not walk? I heard that Americans have got a real thing about walking somewhere as if feet are the tool of Beelzabub or something and besides we have had lawn mowers with seats for ages why not use them?

    36. Re:$4950!? by jduckworth · · Score: 1

      lawnmower with seat?

    37. Re:$4950!? by Tassach · · Score: 2
      Unfortunately, while it doesn't generate emissions, damming rivers to produce hydroelectric power wreaks havoc with the ecosystem.

      While it may not be politically correct to say so, in terms of total enviornmental impact per Megawatt of generated power, nuclear power is far cleaner than any other large-scale power generation technology currently in existance. Yes, Uranium mining is messy. Spent fuel is lethal. Lots of stuff in the plant gets contaminated. It's still a lot better than any of the alternatives: strip mining coal and pumping tons of toxic gasses into the atmosphere, or damming rivers and devistating entire ecosystems, or shipping billions of barrels of oil halfway around the planet in leaky supertankers.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    38. Re:$4950!? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      damming rivers to produce hydroelectric power wreaks havoc with the ecosystem.

      Too true. Dams aren't all they're cracked up to be. It's not all bad though. They do produce an opportunity for new habitats to form for a different environment.

      Solar power's possibly better, but expensive to set up. At least the space it takes up is typically desert. I'm quite fond of wind power. The environmental impact is quite small, and the pollution is non-existent. Tidal power may well become viable sometime.

    39. Re:$4950!? by Harik · · Score: 1
      Modern coal plants are not that dirty, they are much cleaner than every car/truck/lawnmower/bus/train/etc having their own power plant.

      Hey tard-o, there's only a handful of "modern" coal-burning plants around. All the rest are the old, in-efficient, heavy-polluting kind. Guess where most of the electricity comes from?

      Before last year, you could tour our coal plant. (Orlando, FL) It was supposed to be a nuke till the no-nukes crowd stopped it. No containment dome but a bigass cooling tower, so it got converted. Makes for an amazingly efficient coal-burning plant. Still, theoretical max on thermal transfer from coal is only about 20odd percent IIRC.

      --Dan

  14. How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until someone starts tuning them and arrange races. If it's got an engine it can be raced. =)

    1. Re:How long... by nounderscores · · Score: 2

      The moment a "clone" brand comes out which the user can actually get under the hood of and make insane mods to. Nobody ever races the same vehicle that just anybody can go to a shop and buy. It has to be all custom. Heck, even atheletes who race their bodies tune and shave and tweak every last muscle fiber before that starting gun goes off.

      I think that 90% of the race happens before the racers are at the start line.

    2. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think a "clone" is required. I haven't actually read the EULA, but I doubt that there's anything in there that prevent you from opening IT and tuning whatever you like.

      I read somewhere that the industrial version is faster than the one sold to regular users, so there may even be some extra grunt in the standard motor, at the expense of battery life of course.

  15. refresh my memory by kochsr · · Score: 1

    is the segway not "IT" or is it not "ginger"

    1. Re:refresh my memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it isn't not both of those.

    2. Re:refresh my memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not neither. Its MaryAnn!

    3. Re:refresh my memory by v0x0j · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, acctually it is "not a goddamn scooter": "Inventor Unveils Machine That's Not A Goddamn Scooter, OK?"

    4. Re:refresh my memory by AHorseWithNoName · · Score: 1

      I got one the other day!
      No wait, that was a "Ginge" ...

    5. Re:refresh my memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have also heard that the Segway wasn't "IT" or "Ginger". Does anyone else know if the Segway is just a ringer for something people might actually care about?

    6. Re:refresh my memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Segway is "IT", but "IT" is "ginger", not Segway. "ginger" is Segway _and_ "IT" from 09:00 until 11:43 on Thursday mornings, and if there's any cloud formations that look like bunny rabbits. Otherwise "ginger" is "IT" and not Segway.

      All clear now?

  16. Awww by flatface · · Score: 1
    Too bad it's that much to buy, though.. Maybe I would have bought one.

    My outlook on things to come in 2-3 years: Big story on the news, but when it comes to people actually using it, next to nil.

  17. What Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see a problem with this being hyped so much. If enough people buy this, Kamen and his design team will be able to make more medical devices or better wheelchairs or whatever he wants. Whatever it is, he has shown that he is very good at bringing beneficial technologies to life. Helping him helps society.
    Despite that, creating a product which seems mostly intentioned to generate fame and hero-worship is vain. But his good outweighs his bad in my limited view, so why not support him.

  18. Less opinions, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I'm kicking myself for posting it since that just contributes to the problem.

    List of people who care about your internal conflict:

    1. Re:Less opinions, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      2.

      I care

  19. Legal problems. by sifi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think one of the major difficulties for it will be the legal situation - what is it classified as?

    I live in the UK. As I understand it, it will be illegal to ride on the road (since it is a powered vehicle) and also illegal to ride on the pavement (sidewalk). Where the heck can I ride it then?

    Then there's the problem that you look like a complete goon. But I ride a unicycle so who am I to comment?

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:Legal problems. by wind · · Score: 1

      it will be illegal to ride on the road (since it is a powered vehicle)

      This explains a few things about why the traffic is so slow in the UK. (I'm picturing all the cars being propelled by hamsters :) )

      But, seriously, you must mean that there is something about it that makes it illegal to drive on the road despite being a powered vehicle, right? I'm curious about this, for both the US and UK, because it's not clear to me why it would be illegal. Too slow? Not a problem for urban areas. The driver is too poorly protected? Then why are motorcycles legal?

      Just curious.

    2. Re:Legal problems. by sifi · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the UK it would be classed as a Motorbike (Catergory L1e) (the motor power being over 200w). This means that it has the same legal requirements as this class of Motorbikes:

      I'm no expert but I'd guess this means:

      - Road tax
      - Insurance
      - Number Plate (what do you do with that?)
      - Lights?

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    3. Re:Legal problems. by operagost · · Score: 1

      It isn't quick enough to qualify as a motorbike.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Legal problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legal Paradise

      What a bonanza for lawyers. This will be better than asbestos. An inherently dangerous device that is illegal to use; what could be better. Well one thing is better, all the hype..which will serve to bury the promoters.

      A Florida Lawyer

    5. Re:Legal problems. by excaliburdj · · Score: 1

      Somebody will surely come out with a little plastic holder that clips to the back of your shirt collar or belt so your license plate is clearly hanging where the police can get at it.

      Also useful for those "Wide Load" signs for fat people, or maybe red flags for people who are carrying objects longer than the circumference of the divice.

    6. Re:Legal problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Germany we have _a lot_ of bike lanes, and they would be perfect for riding it. Unfortunately, 99% of all posters here ramble on about which state passed which law, and why they are unsafe at full speed at a crowded sidewalk (Hint: if it is crowed, you can go slower. The thing doesn't just have the two standing-still and -full-forward modes).

      I can't wait to actually try one, the self-balancing mechanism is very probably just uebercool.

  20. picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn lazy cops.

  21. What I want to know is.... by b96miata · · Score: 1

    How much are they giving for the trade-in on your legs?

  22. funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How several people POSTED in the comments of other stories yesterday that it was for sale and that the editors REJECTED the story...

    waiting for your friend to post it taco?

    slashdot is starting to REALLY suck lately.

  23. cmdr taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if u hate to puch the hype, than don't post the shiat on the front page. add it to a slashback or something...

    yes, quantity of posts is up, and yes quality is down to match.

  24. Slashdot in April 25, 2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Segway sux as you crash.

  25. Definitions: "Sell" and "Reserve" by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

    I suspect that a strange thought control gas was delivered along with the press release, because both the teevee and Amazon.com also claimed that the Segway was now selling.

    For reference: "Selling" is an event where you give me money and I give you something. "Reserving" is where you and I enter into an agreement that sometime in the future I will give you the first opportunity to give me money, at which time I will give you something.

    Hope this clarifies things!

    1. Re:Definitions: "Sell" and "Reserve" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a long time for shipping and handling. Like when you get a prize from a cereal box

  26. YET ANOTHER QUALITY STORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..rejected by Taco fucker and brought to you by the hacker underground.

    News.com is reporting that IBM has won a $290 million contract with the federal government to build what are expected to be the world's two fastest supercomputers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The other machine, the Linux powered Blue Gene/L will be 10 times faster than the current #1 , NEC's Earth Simulator with a speed of 360 teraflops, according to IBM.

  27. The Much Hyped Segway by maddskillz · · Score: 1

    You have to give these guys credit, for marketing their product quite well.
    Most people who are going to try and sell a scooter are not going to market it as a product that will change the world. Then making people wait to see what the heck it actually is draws the interest of all sorts of newspapers, and gets free advertising. Finally, once they annouce the product, they get a bunch of actors to use them in TV shows, to really drive up the hype.
    I am not saying it's a bad product. It actually looks pretty cool, but for $5000 I expect it to do all the work for me, and to go fast. I guess it might lead to good things in the future, but right now, it's just another toy for the rich, hardly changing the world

  28. Who cares if it's overhyped? by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't like it, don't buy it.

    However, do not deny the technology in it is very cool. In fact, the Amazon.com order page has a very nice semi-detailed overview of how everything works, with diagrams, etc.

    I can't wait to try one of these one day when they come down in price.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:Who cares if it's overhyped? by Didion+Sprague · · Score: 1
      Even cooler is the gyroscopic wheelchair.

      I'm no technology expert, but it would seem to me that the wheelchair -- not this scooter -- is the more important invention.

      60 Minutes did a profile on Kamen and his inventions last week, and while the scooter looks cool -- and fat guys are able to navigate pretty nimbly so long as they don't lean too far forward -- the wheelchair can climb stairs, climb curbs, move on two wheels, four, or one.

      Now *that's* cool.

  29. ... Hurray? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goodie, now we can all get fatter.. or are old people can 'kick it' with more style... ? All I can think of is the South Park episode where Mr. Garrison develops the people mover thing with the inner rectal seat... I don't really remember what he called the thing

    1. Re:... Hurray? by cakoose · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that the episode was a Segway parody. I think he called the device "it", the same thing Segway was referred previously reffered to as.

  30. Start a rental business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Seriously, if I lived in a big city, or a touristy area, I would be tempted to buy one right away and charge to rent it. I can see a lot of people ponying up 20 bucks to try one out.

  31. A first hand impression by L0C0loco · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had the opportunity to see a Segway in use at, of all places, the Toledo Zoo. Aside from looking really cool in action, this thing is supposed to of interest to companies as a productivity enhancing tool. The guy I saw moved along smartly with a package in a basket on the Segway. As I continued to watch, he pulled up at his destination, dismounted and then stood there watching the Segway to make sure it didn't roll/drive away on its own. I would have dismissed this, but he made such a deliberate effort to assure himself that it would stay put. He spent perhaps 15 seconds doing so. I have to conclude that his experience on the Segway taught him to be certain it stays put. If he has to do this every time he dismounts then there is more productivity to be gained. Maybe a little voice recognition system should be added to these things. "Segway, sit! Stay! Good Segway!"

    --
    -- Instant Karma's gonna get you! [320848 = 2*2*2*2*11*1823]
    1. Re:A first hand impression by will_die · · Score: 2

      Segway corp initially did this big push to try to get police, large spread of office complexes, park rangers, post offices to purchase them. They even have a post office version with a trailor to carry the bags.
      Somehow I don't think that they are going to replace golf carts in large building and office complexes.
      However they would be fun to race down long halls and in flat places outdoors.

    2. Re:A first hand impression by kampit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe if it had a red led display which swings from side to side two leds at a time and a comlink so you could issue commands and it would reply in a computerized voice.

      "Segway, pick me up."
      "On my way, Michael."

      After that all it needs is a better name and it'd be a chick magnet, S.E.G.W.A.Y doesnt quite cut it.

    3. Re:A first hand impression by Chaswell · · Score: 3, Informative

      I saw one at Epcot here at Disney in Orlando. The guy was not demoing but actually using it to deliver packages. At one store he had to get off and go inside, but first stood next to it with his hand in front of the handle bar to keep bumping it back because it was trying to leave him. After a few seconds it finally stopped.

    4. Re:A first hand impression by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      Maybe not replacing golf carts in large buildings, but what about an enhanced Segway to replace golf carts on golf courses? I think that would be pretty sweet.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    5. Re:A first hand impression by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

      Quite simply I dont think they have the range to be a "patrol" device. So this rules out police and rangers and postal workers, etc.

      Unless their are battery exchange spots at random locations. Or perhaps do like the AirForce and have the golf carts carry the spare batteries in the field...

    6. Re:A first hand impression by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      He spent perhaps 15 seconds doing so

      Maybe he was really keeping an eye on that shady geeky looking guy standing there watching his Segway. ;-)

    7. Re:A first hand impression by GT_Alias · · Score: 2
      Aside from looking really cool in action, this thing is supposed to of interest to companies as a productivity enhancing tool.

      Ehhh...was that sarcasm? Here in Atlanta I saw one of the "Ambassadors" (or whatever they're calling those guys now) cruising up the sidewalk on one of those things. Damn thing looked like a Fisher-Price toy, and he looked about the farthest thing from cool while standing on it.

    8. Re:A first hand impression by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      hehe.. how about S.H.I.T.T.

    9. Re:A first hand impression by ashitaka · · Score: 2

      Aren't these things supposed top lock once you take the "activation key" out of its slot?

      Sounds like they're leaving the thing on with the key in the ignition.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  32. Segway not IT ?? by Flamesplash · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember reading a while back about how people who were shown IT/Ginger in it's development have basically said Segway is not it. ZDNet has the story.

    I was curious why Steve Jobs was getting all excited about something like this, doesn't seem like him.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Segway not IT ?? by Soulslayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IT is most likely the Stirling Engine that Kamen has been working on for a long while.

      The cheap modern Stirling engine of Kamen's dreams would indeed be an incredible development is it ever comes to fruition.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    2. Re:Segway not IT ?? by Flamesplash · · Score: 2

      I thought the neatness of the Segway was the gyroscopic handling of weight balance on a single axle, not the engine per se, though I believe you are correct that it contains one of his engines.

      Kamen gave an hour long talk where I work about a year ago. The entire time he was sitting in another invention of his, a wheel chair that can go from sitting on 4 wheels/2axles to only 2 wheels/1 axle, which since then has been named the iBot. The second mode giving the person added height to reach thing on higher shelves, and being similar to the Segway in that you can't fall over, even despite my largest co-worker yanking on the thing with kamen in it. Kamen didn't like that too much. MSN had a good video trial usage of this, here's the cooresponding article

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    3. Re:Segway not IT ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iBot can also climb stairs. IIRC Kamen demoed it by climbing to the first platform of the Eiffel tower.

    4. Re:Segway not IT ?? by Flamesplash · · Score: 2

      hehe, I didn't want to go into it's features, but it can also get across sand, pebbles and other surfaces traditional wheechairs can't.

      As for the stari climbing, it beat a professional athlete up something like 3k stairs at a 10% grade. Whew!

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    5. Re:Segway not IT ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >though I believe you are correct that it contains one of his engines.

      It doesn't contain a sterling engine. It is battery powered. The sterling engine is ANOTHER project Kamen is working on.

    6. Re:Segway not IT ?? by mbourgon · · Score: 2

      What I had heard was that Amazon is selling the Industrial Version, not the Consumer Version.

      The big rumor has also been that the Consumer Segway will actually be an innovation - it's a segway, but one that runs on a Stirling Engine.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    7. Re:Segway not IT ?? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      you are correct in that they were originally supposed to be selling the "consumer" version - but are actually selling the industrial model (I assume due to the fact that the consumer model is just not ready) - but what is this sterling engine people are mentioning?

    8. Re:Segway not IT ?? by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      Of course Segway is not IT, it's HT. IT is the next rev

    9. Re:Segway not IT ?? by Flamesplash · · Score: 2

      IT is the next rev

      Iguana Transporter???

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    10. Re:Segway not IT ?? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      The rumours I find far more fascinating (and hard to swallow, I am the first to admit) are the ones that say Kamen is perfecting a personal levitation device.

      Bob Metcalfe of 3Com stated "Some months ago when speculation was running high, I said that Kamen's It was more important than the Internet, but not as important as cold fusion, had cold fusion worked out. The It I was talking about, which I did not disclose, was NOT Segway."

      Now, do you really think that he would claim a Stirling-engine powered scooter is more important than the Internet? I for one doubt that. Now if it turns out to actually be a viable form of LEVITATION.... all of a sudden the hype, hyperbole, and secrecy starts to fit...

      And before you laugh and state this is ridiculous and impossible, read up on the Coral Castle and try to explain it. (Not to mention the pyramids, stonehenge, etc)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    11. Re:Segway not IT ?? by rtechie · · Score: 1

      And before you laugh and state this is ridiculous and impossible, read up on the Coral Castle and try to explain it. (Not to mention the pyramids, stonehenge, etc)

      From an article found <a href=http://www.margaretmorrisbooks.com/gordon_mic hael_scallion.html>here</a>:

      "The fact is that Edward Leedskalnin [the builder of Coral Castle] lived near a junk yard. There he was able to get scrap steel to build simple devices for lifting blocks. ... The idea that Edward Leedskalnin levitated blocks is an urban legend..."

    12. Re:Segway not IT ?? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      Well thanks for the link, but I don't buy that even slightly. You're trying to support a claim that a 100 pound man, with scrap steel from a nearby junkyard, was able to build some magical device which was capable of moving rocks up to 30 tonnes around?

      The fact is, nobody, including modern engineers, have the slightest clue how he was able to manipulate such enormous loads at all, much less with the astounding precision demonstrated. Did you read that link I sent? Here is an interesting excerpt:

      'In 1936, when developers threatened to set up a subdivision near Florida City, Leedskalnin bought ten acres in nearby Homestead with money saved through years of performing odd jobs for neighboring farmers. He dismantled the largely finished Castle and transferred it block by block to the new location. Each piece was placed on a pair of iron girders mounted on a makeshift truck chassis and transported over ten miles to Homestead.

      For this major operation, he relied on outside help for the first and last time. He hired a tractor, but insisted that its driver not be present whenever the blocks were placed on his truck. The driver showed up at 9:00 every morning, returning in late afternoon to find the chassis loaded with coral monoliths.

      Once, the driver absentmindedly returned after less than half an hour for a lunchpail he had forgotten on the seat of the tractor. He was astounded to see several multi-ton stones already laid neatly on the girders. "It was impossible to have stacked those gigantic blocks in under 30 minutes," he recalled, "even with a steam-powered derrick. And Ed had no equipment, just a simple tackle and chain hoist. Yet, there they were, piled like cord wood.'

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    13. Re:Segway not IT ?? by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Well thanks for the link, but I don't buy that even slightly. You're trying to support a claim that a 100 pound man, with scrap steel from a nearby junkyard, was able to build some magical device which was capable of moving rocks up to 30 tonnes around?

      First of all, you're talking it on faith that he had no assistance. This is unlikely despite the APPARANT lack of testimonials. Construction happened about 60-80 years ago, so it's entirely possible that all his assistants are dead.

      Second, a dozen college students with no modern tools have been able to construct obelisks and pyramids in experiments based on replicating the work of the ancients. Perhaps not on the scale of Coral Castle (there is a limit to what you can do in a weekend), but it is possible.

      Third, Coral Castle is the major tourist attraction in Florida City. The locals have a vested interest in keeping the "mystery" going. So the locals would NEVER lie about the authenticity of the Castle, nor hint at "mysterious" forces surrounding it's construction.

      The fact is, nobody, including modern engineers, have the slightest clue how he was able to manipulate such enormous loads at all, much less with the astounding precision demonstrated. Did you read that link I sent?

      Yes, I read the link, and I wasn't impressed. The fact it that it's certainlly possible that a single man, with access to limited heavy equipment (he had access to tractors and trucks), and access to plenty of scrap steel for framing, and lots of time, it's entirely possible.

      I have no idea if qualified modern engineers have examined the Castle, and neither do you. There are no verifiable sources given in any of the links I visited.

      Apply Occam's Razor: Which is more likely, that Leedskalnin empoloyed well-known conventional means to build his Castle, or that Leedskalnin had magic powers?

      Once, the driver absentmindedly returned after less than half an hour for a lunchpail he had forgotten on the seat of the tractor. He was astounded to see several multi-ton stones already laid neatly on the girders. "It was impossible to have stacked those gigantic blocks in under 30 minutes," he recalled, "even with a steam-powered derrick. And Ed had no equipment, just a simple tackle and chain hoist. Yet, there they were, piled like cord wood.'

      You might notice something about this story. It's apocryptal. Notice how the driver is only identified as "driver"? There is no way to verify this story. I'd bet that this story comes from Leedskalnin himself.

  33. Wow by phaze3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just can't wait for 'Segway XXX' on the PS2, Gamecube and X-Box!

    --
    Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    1. Re:Wow by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      Maybe it'll be a sequel to this.

      ~Philly

  34. Other stuff... by Soulslayer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dean Kamen's super advanced robotic wheelchair is far more impressive (a lot of the technology behind the Segway comes from it). It is 4 wheel drive, can stand a person upright so that the wheelchair bound can look "norms" in the eyes, climbs stairs with ease, is faster than a Segway, and is as compact a normal non-folding wheelchair.

    And he has been working on a true compact Stirling Engine using modern materials for quite some time. Supposedly is quite close to getting it working affordably. Such a device could do wonders for the energy problems of today (not to mention providing electric power even in the most remote areas).

    This is also the guy that invented several key medical devices used in much of modern cardiovascular and vascular medicine. Things such as a blood pump that due to the design of the turbine blades within it does not damage blood cells as they pass through the device.

    Dean is also the founder of the US FIRST program designed to get children of the US (and other countries) interested in science and invention at an early age. The US FIRST robotics competition has inspired some very interesting advances in robotics.

    --


    Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    1. Re:Other stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Such a device could do wonders for the energy problems of today

      Well, sort of. Stirling engines run on fossil fuels so even though they're up to twice as efficient as internal combustion engines, they still emit greenhouse gasses.

      A common fallacy is that various improvements in technology will result in resource savings. For a given individual that might be true but overall, technology causes an increase in consumption. The energy problems of today will only be solved by reduced consumption. It's real hard to consume our way out of a problem caused by increased consumption! :( Consuming smarter includes consuming less.

      Put another way, we're always looking for a way to twiddle with the details to preserve our way of life, when our way of life itself is killing us. Energy is an addiction. But it's less destructive than smoking, so the fact that quite a few people are getting around to looking at it as an addiction shows evolution of a sort.

    2. Re:Other stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stirling engines require a source of heat, they don't necessarily run on fossil fuels.

    3. Re:Other stuff... by jacquesm · · Score: 2

      bzzzzt... stirling engines can run on solar power, thermal differences (geothermal) and so on...

    4. Re:Other stuff... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

      Dean Kamen [usfirst.org]'s super advanced robotic wheelchair [dekaresearch.com] is far more impressive (a lot of the technology behind the Segway comes from it).

      Indeed, this goes to show that the parts in the Segway are much more impressive then the Segway itself. Quick charging technology, self-balancing technology. I'd love to see this stuff put incorporated into other things like bicycles.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  35. Sinclaire by nounderscores · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    According to this link and this one The C5 was made by sinclaire research. So yes, in actual fact, both machines were made by the great Bald Boffin Sinclaire

    1. Re:Sinclaire by dair · · Score: 1

      That's "Sinclair" - no e.

      -dair

  36. Not overhyped by Morky · · Score: 1

    Taco, you won't think is overhyped when you're 85 years old and using a similar, but smaller device to keep up with your grandkids on walks to the park.

    1. Re:Not overhyped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but the question is, will Taco really NEED the auto-balancing ability of Segway since he'll have his trusty vibrating shoes?

    2. Re:Not overhyped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, taking your grandkids is nice, but it's hardly worth a week of solid media coverage, and doesn't really revolutionize the world...

  37. Incredible by *Pres* · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I find it incredible how overwhelmingly negative the reactions of the Slashdot crowd are regarding this product.

    Sure, the Segway HT has been hyped. Duh. Take a dictionary and look up the word "Marketing". This doesn't make it a bad product.

    I can't wait to try one. I expect it to be like the Palmpilot and the original Macs: if you try them, most people "feel" that this is not your average new gadget. Ofcourse I could be wrong.

    1. Re:Incredible by Steve+B · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      I find it incredible how overwhelmingly negative the reactions of the Slashdot crowd are regarding this product.

      Well, then, you shouldn't believe the stereotype that /. readers never leave their computers. Sometimes, they go out and walk, and prefer to do so without being run off the sidewalk by some clown moving at sprint speed with 80 pounds of extra weight.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    2. Re:Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I find it incredible how overwhelmingly negative the reactions of the Slashdot crowd are regarding this product.
      Don't be so surprised - we're just older and wiser than you, and we've seen this dumb idea fail in the market before. That's why we're negative: the product really is a heap of junk.
  38. Would be nice..... by AUsBandit · · Score: 1

    if 33 out of 50 states hadn't banned them on sidewalks. This looks like a great Sci-fi advancement come to life but unfortunatly the good'uns have made them all but useless by saying we can't have them on the sidewalks before they ever prooved they were a problem. Sheeeze. In the country of "innocent untill prooven guilty" it is surpriseing to see us delcair a vehicle dangerous before we try it out. Usually it takes at least 3 million dollar studies before we ever pass a law against something. I am ashamed to see the majority of states react the way they did to progress.

    1. Re:Would be nice..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you live in an area without any sidewalks, like many American suburbs. Then you are really screwed!

    2. Re:Would be nice..... by vidarh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhmm. You have it the wrong way around: 32 states have so far passed legislation that explicitly allow it on sidewalks.

    3. Re:Would be nice..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . then you don't need a Segway, you need a car, to pack up all your crap and move to civilization.

    4. Re:Would be nice..... by Chaswell · · Score: 2

      Please, can either one of the parents back up their claim with evidence? I am considering reserving one for my father for Christmas and I would like to hear how legislation is affecting the viability of the Segway.

    5. Re:Would be nice..... by AUsBandit · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/ch ronicle/archive/2002/11/19/BA152460.DTL

      I was wrong he was right. Paragraph 4. I skimed and made a mistake. Sorry:)

      Of course now I wonder why we have to pass laws to allow things. I thought we were free minus the laws/restrictions.

    6. Re:Would be nice..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i get an error when i follow that link. wanna try again?

    7. Re:Would be nice..... by Schwamm · · Score: 2

      Considering the number of times I've been almost seriously injured by people using blades, scooters, mopeds, and bicycles on sidewalks, I'm quite happy to not have Segways allowed.

      I don't trust people to not be stupid with them, and I see no reason to risk public safety before proving that people are stupid and can't use Segways responsibly.

    8. Re:Would be nice..... by vidarh · · Score: 2
      The reasons for the laws is that many states have already banned various forms of vehicles on sidewalks. The laws in question either explicitly makes an exception for the Segway and similar devices or in some cases prohibits local regulations that could keep the Segway off sidewalks.

      In addition to the states that have explicitly made it legal, 7 more doesn't have restrictions that would stop the Segway from being used on sidewalks. So it's really only 11 states where it may still be prevented from using the sidewalks.

    9. Re:Would be nice..... by Gaurang · · Score: 1

      Considering the number of times I've been almost seriously injured by people using blades, scooters, mopeds, and bicycles on sidewalks, I'm quite happy to not have Segways allowed.

      Funny. You know what, when vehicles running on wheels, (something like today's bicycles) were first made, there were some strong objections that it would endanger the people walking besides the person doing the ride... :) Looks kinda similar.

      Good we got through.

      --
      I have found a solution to Riemann's Hypothesis, but have run out of spac
  39. How to improve the Segway... by Bohnanza · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dear Mr. Kamen,

    I am very excited by the chance to purchase a new Segway Human Transporter. While I understand that the Segway is the most important invention in the history of mankind, I feel that it could use a few improvements:

    -I don't feel like standing up while I travel. Segway needs a seat.

    -I can't picture myself leaning around to control Segway, especially when sitting down. Add two more wheels and a better control system. Maybe a steering wheel and a couple of foot pedals will do.

    -I'm certainly not going to ride around in the open air, especially in bad weather. Add a roof, a heater, and an air conditioner.

    -17 miles an hour? Two hours of operation? Sorry, I have places to go. Add a nice 6-cylinder engine.

    -Where am I supposed to put my groceries? Add a trunk. And a back seat. I have a family, you know!

    Add all this, and maybe a 4-speaker CD system, and I think you'll have a winner!

    --

    -----

    Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

    1. Re:How to improve the Segway... by Erich · · Score: 4, Funny
      Bohnanza,

      Most of your requested features are planned for Segway v2. Not only will these features be added, but Segway will be safe to drive on normal streets. It will truely be a revolutionary thing. Entire countries will be redesigned around Segway v2. Families around the world will come to our office and bow before us, thanking us for the amazing accomplishment we have made.

      The initial analysis is that Segway v2 will cost about $320,000, and will have a range of 70km (about 45 miles), or possibly even more. It will be able to run for up to 90 minutes, and when the power is exhausted a simple 18-hour process can be used to power the machine up again.

      I think you will agree that $320,000 is a small price to pay for technology that will revolutionize the world.

      --

      -- Erich

      Slashdot reader since 1997

  40. Let's give it a chance by cleetus · · Score: 2

    Like most of you all I am feeling a bit of jealousy at those who can afford it, but at the same time I am equally skeptical. What's the solution? Let some people buy it, and if they like it and it fills a need, the word will spread, more people will buy it, the price will go down, and maybe you or I will get one and you soon we'll be bumping into each other. Or not. Either way, more information about the thing is always valuable, and whether this comes from brochures, reviews or word of mouth, I don't care; they all allow me to make a better decision in the end.

    cleetus

  41. For the disabled by nounderscores · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know that there is a wheelchair called the ibot which is made by John Williamson. Part of the attraction is that when the chair is in "standing" mode, the wheelchair bound person is on the same eye level as able bodied people. (is abled bodied people the correct term for people with working legs?) anyway, what would happen if a paralysed person braced their legs straight and then balanced on the platform of a segeway and got that same six foot tall feeling of looking a six foot tall person in the eye for 1/20th the cost of an i-bot wheelchair?

    1. Re:For the disabled by nounderscores · · Score: 2, Interesting

      oh wait, foolish me the ibot invented by the segeway inventor dean kamen and made by Johnson and Johnson!!!

    2. Re:For the disabled by Jezzerr · · Score: 1

      Yeah great idea....only one problem, the segeway requires balance, since most people with disabilities have trouble balancing I doubt the segeway would make a very good i-bot wheelchair.

      The term "able-bodied" applies to a person with no physical or mental disability that affects movement of the body. So therefore no its not the correct term for people with "working legs"

      --
      The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and Stupidity.
  42. You'll know they've hit the mainstream when.... by jeepliberty · · Score: 1

    You drive by the ghetto and see them sitting on blocks, sans wheels!

  43. Segway pics, click .sig by bucklesl · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm kicking myself for posting it...

    I think that's what my box will be saying after posting this...

    I got to ride one of them last August -- it was pretty wild.

    http://sethbuckley.com/gallery/Segway

    --
    help fill in hidden movie endings @ End of the Credits
    1. Re:Segway pics, click .sig by quintessent · · Score: 2

      I seriously can't wait to try this out.

      What's with all the skepticism around here, anyway? There's too much of an "I don't use anything like that now, so why would I ever want to" attitude.

    2. Re:Segway pics, click .sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I also rode one last September (pictures not available, since it shows me in shorts). Disney is using them in its parks and on its ships, and they rent them to people to try out on the cruises.

      While it was neat, and I had a blast, I found a lot of things that people don't seem to mention while talking about how great a ride it is:

      • "Leaning" lets you go forward/backwards. To turn, you still have a hand control.
      • You don't really "lean". In fact, its hard to describe what you're really doing. When I leaned forward, it didn't really change how it moved. You kinda shift your balance forward and backwards. The side effect of this is that you're using leg muscles in a whole different way. People who used it confided in me that after an hour or so of use, your legs get pretty tired.
      • Try going at high speeds and turning. If your balance isn't quite right (and its a different balance than you're used to, see above), you run the risk of tilting over. Its like learning to ride a bike all over again, but requiring completely different balancing skills.
      • Its a dream on smooth terrain. On gravel, it was pretty hard to control since its throwing your balance off. I was told that on other surfaces its best with different tires.
      • All this said, its really not hard to get the basics down.

      In conclusion, I had fun on my test ride. Its convicned me I have no need to get one, especially at that price. I drove it in an empty open area, with a small side area with gravel. I can't imagine trying to use this on a sidewalk where there is anyone else around, and trying to swerve around people is asking for trouble from beginners. I think its something everyone should try, but I see the market for this as stunningly small.

    3. Re:Segway pics, click .sig by happystink · · Score: 2

      This is slashdot remember! A 100mhz speed bump and $200 price drop on a laptop is amazing important news, and an awesome toy like this is "overhyped and overpriced". An Xbox running linux is the greatest thing since sliced bread (which was only really cool when they got the breadbox running linux), but this, baaah, boring. What I love is people saying it's overhyped and overpriced without ever riding one or seeing one in person, so ludicrous.

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

  44. fast enough by budalite · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, if it goes over 30mph, it'll go faster than most of the traffic in Northern VA during rush hour. If you could brrrm down Hwy. 66 and pass all the other traffic on the extreme left, it would be pretty cool. Heck, near all the "popular" exits, the right lane is usually moving at walking speed anyway. The only real problem I see is that business about leaning forward to go forward & v/v at high speeds. I am probably not that coordinated. Also, people who are concerned about their hair-styling will not be pleased. However, if you can get your dog on the back, s/he would love it. That's it. The ultimate dog-walker!! Thank you, thank you very much. }:{)||

    1. Re:fast enough by bucklesl · · Score: 2
      The only real problem I see is that business about leaning forward to go forward & v/v at high speeds.

      After riding one for about 15 minutes, it takes all of 3 seconds to learn to balance on it -- you just have to stand on it. I drove it down and up a hill. There's no problem doing either. It's weird leaning forward while going down hill, but the thing automatically corrects. When you go up hill, it is constantly "righting" itself, so you don't fall on your face.

      --
      help fill in hidden movie endings @ End of the Credits
  45. Another stair in the downward spiral... by Bullseye_blam · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Could you imagine someone using a cell-phone while riding a Segway?

    "A woman was brutally run over today by an errant Segway operator. When asked about the incident, the Segway driver claimed that his unit was faulty; it didn't include turn signals and the use of slothenly 'hand-signals' is be entirely out of the question."

    I swear someone's gonna get smacked into and we'll have a lawsuit. You watch!

    -Bullseye

    1. Re:Another stair in the downward spiral... by praedor · · Score: 2

      Well... I'll file a lawsuit against both the operator and the city (for allowing it on sidewalks) AFTER I use the toy to beat the sh*t out of the idiot that ran into me or my wife.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  46. Another way to stay FAT by praedor · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Woo-hoo, a TOY that will get people to avoid even the most basic and simple bit of exercise called WALKING. People, particularly Americans, are pigs and idiots. They hop in their car to drive down the block to get a soda and then drive back home. They eat, eat, eat and sit on their fat, lazy asses and waste money on useless and silly toys.


    For Mithras' sake, use your frickin' legs and DO something! Exercise you damn lazy, nasty, flabby lardasses. DON'T buy a segway, WALK. Or ride a bike. If you don't like the seat giving you a wedgy, get a reclining bike.


    These toys should be largely relegated to foot patrol cops and mail delivery personnel. Everyone else can walk and burn a few frickin' calories to at least TRY to offset your billion calorie supersized McD's lardass lunch special.


    Ya'll make me sick (those itching to have one of these things). Lazy-ass pigs.

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    1. Re:Another way to stay FAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen about two posts saying they were looking forward to it. Are you sure you aren't overcompensating for something?

      I bet your a pimple faced dork anyway. So no one cares that you aren't fat.

    2. Re:Another way to stay FAT by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      Walking is great until you realize many people are hurting themselves because of the shoes they're wearing. :-(

      In their zeal to make fashion statements too many shoe companies make shoes that look stylish but in fact are bad for humans walking or standing for long periods of time. You'll be amazed how many foot, leg and lower back problems could be avoided by wearing a proper pair of shoes.

      That does explain why Birkenstocks and Rockport shoes are quite popular--both of these companies make excellent, very comfortable shoes that are great even for long walks.

    3. Re:Another way to stay FAT by cduffy · · Score: 2

      Do you realize that some Americans are actually thin? Heck, there even exists a subset of people who are unable to gain weight effectively no matter how much they eat! Claiming that every user who is not a "foot patrol cop or delivery personnel" should be walking for the sake of their health is thus a gross overgeneralization made on account of the subset of people to whom the lardass generalization applies.

      Would you make this same objection to Vespa owners? How about people who ride bicycles? (For a given distance, they do provide less exercise than walking).

      Y'all make me sick (those making wide insults and gross overgeneralizations without having details on a single specific case). Silly idiots.

    4. Re:Another way to stay FAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um I don't know if you have noticed, but there is a weigh limit of 250 pounds on this machine.

    5. Re:Another way to stay FAT by praedor · · Score: 2

      In America, 250 lbs almost always means tremendously fat. Australia, so I read, is hellbent on matching America as the lardo center of the world but they have a lot of catching up to do.


      In any case, the sidewalk is not the place for this, anymore than it is a place for bicycles, motor scooters, etc. Everyone would be better off with more walking or bike riding and less driving or Segging. Thin people will BECOME fat as their last bit of exercise (walking) goes out in favor of using their new toy.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    6. Re:Another way to stay FAT by praedor · · Score: 1, Troll

      Do you realise that the nonfat American population is the MINORITY? The US is THE fattest nation in the world. It is irrelevant that 10% of the population is actually healthy or exercises. The vast majority, and thus the majority of those who will purchase such things as the Segway, are overweight. Their kids are overweight too (it IS a problem of epidemic proportions in the USofA) and will not be helped when daddy warbucks shells out 4 grand to buy their portly kid a segway.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    7. Re:Another way to stay FAT by CyrusSukhia · · Score: 1

      While some people will be lazy, this invention will have it's uses. There's no need to be so broadly insulting. For instance, why do Americans need to be fat AND stupid? How would using a Segway establish that?

    8. Re:Another way to stay FAT by operagost · · Score: 1

      Wow, I see the trolls are modding up the trolls today.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:Another way to stay FAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about people who ride bicycles? (For a given distance, they do provide less exercise than walking)

      Cycling may burn off less energy over the same distance (assuming your bike isn't entirely fucked), but it's more likely to get you into the range of actually doing sufficient work to encourage muscular development. Walking may reduce the amount of weight you put on, but it doesn't do a lot to get you fit.

    10. Re:Another way to stay FAT by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Flat soled birkenstocks are one of the fashion statements you alluded to. They have no proper arch support, and are one of the worst things you can do to your calves, thighs, buttox, and lower back.

      Though a pair of properly designed orthopedic shoes would make you look like a retard.

      Remember when Kramer met Mel Torme wearing the vertical leap trainers?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    11. Re:Another way to stay FAT by Yazheirx · · Score: 1

      Ya'll make me sick (those itching to have one of these things). Lazy-ass pigs

      No, dude, don't hold back. Tell us how you realy feel. Don't try to protect our feelings.

      --
      More of my thoughts
    12. Re:Another way to stay FAT by praedor · · Score: 2

      Americans ARE stupid. They support Homeland Security which means destruction of basic "American" civil liberties. They think that freedom of speech goes too far. They don't give a damn about DMCA and related things that directly affects them. They ARE lazy and stupid. Bovine, as an adjective, or a load of sheep also applies.


      Lazy, idiotic, fat bovines...to a overweight man/woman.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    13. Re:Another way to stay FAT by praedor · · Score: 2

      Does speaking one's mind AND speaking the Truth automatically make one a troll?


      This ain't Candyland full of Candyasses who only speak sugar and syrup. This is the real fat world.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    14. Re:Another way to stay FAT by palutke · · Score: 1

      I'm not a pig, I'm geting ready to hibernate.

      --
      'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
    15. Re:Another way to stay FAT by revery · · Score: 1

      Woo-hoo, a TOY that will get people to avoid even the most basic and simple bit of exercise called WALKING. People, particularly Americans, are pigs and idiots. They hop in their car to drive down the block to get a soda and then drive back home. They eat, eat, eat and sit on their fat, lazy asses and waste money on useless and silly toys.
      For Mithras' sake, use your frickin' legs and DO something! Exercise you damn lazy, nasty, flabby lardasses. DON'T buy a segway, WALK. Or ride a bike. If you don't like the seat giving you a wedgy, get a reclining bike.
      These toys should be largely relegated to foot patrol cops and mail delivery personnel. Everyone else can walk and burn a few frickin' calories to at least TRY to offset your billion calorie supersized McD's lardass lunch special.
      Ya'll make me sick (those itching to have one of these things). Lazy-ass pigs.


      This post brought to you by Praedor, your personal fitness dictator, the temple of the invicible Mithras, and our motto, "Because you're stupid!!"

    16. Re:Another way to stay FAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 grand. You were tricked by the $4950 marketing oldest trick in the book??!

    17. Re:Another way to stay FAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a fat epidemic. Too much bad fast food is being served and eaten here.

    18. Re:Another way to stay FAT by CyrusSukhia · · Score: 1

      Okay fine maybe I was leading you a bit off topic so let's get back to it. The Segway HT will still have it's uses. Think of any person that has to use a walker to get around; or simply somebody that's put on crutches; or, to put it more generally ;), anybody who simply can't walk long distances.

      Just because you think it's a toy doesn't mean that it will be a toy for EVERYBODY.

      Cheers

    19. Re:Another way to stay FAT by cduffy · · Score: 1

      The segway won't even work all that well for the portly kid -- more power needed to keep it upright. Your 90% figure is bullshit (taking an informal poll of the folks around me, only one out of 9 is substantially overweight, and two of those 9 are well below their target weights), and you still haven't addressed the remainder of my points.

      Finally, if some overweight individual wishes to take some action which will make his or her problem worse, that's his or her own choice; you have nothing to do with it, so STFU.

  47. My mailman has had one for 6-8 months! by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2

    How'd he pull that one off?

    I guess they decided to sell to the govt first.

    1. Re:My mailman has had one for 6-8 months! by nemoest · · Score: 0

      Yes on June 4th the postmaster general decided to purchase 40 segways for a nationwide study. Norman was the first of 5 nationwide test sites.

      The article is here

    2. Re:My mailman has had one for 6-8 months! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just saw a mailman in a very nice nieghborhood in seattle using one... it seemed rediculous...

      get on, ride 10 feet to next house, get off deliver mail... repeat.

      you can bet we wont see these in my nieghborhood where kids would probably try to jump on and take it for a ride.

    3. Re:My mailman has had one for 6-8 months! by hughk · · Score: 2
      Interestingly enough, the German Post Office is using electric powered trolleys for delivery. These are small, pedestrian controled and are easily manouvered onto escalators, trams and busses. They are bigger than a Segway but with three wheels, are dumber and therefore a lot cheaper.

      With the distance between houses in towns being relatively small, the advantage of giving the postman wheels are negligable.

      Where I see it being more useful is something like an airport where personnel have to move rapidly around a terminal and currently bikes are in use.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  48. Seriously... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Seriously, isn't this thing overrated? IMHO the person who can quiet down noisy skateboards should get a Nobel prize, but skateboards, scooters, bicycles, rollerblades and Razors (and assorted ripoffs) all have if over these things because they're self powered, efficient and effective. And, you could buy a full set of all of the above, at a very high quality for the minimum price of one Segway. I expect they have some nice limited use, but they're no substitute for ambulation.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  49. Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    So far, with no fanfare, legislators in 32 states have declared the Segway welcome on local sidewalks, according to this article in The Register. .

    Northern NJ towns are already regretting that hasty cave-in, according to this article. The state law Segway lobbyists pushed through prohibits towns from banning any "electric personal assistive mobility devices,'' says that story--the law " was passed after Segway, maker of the "Human Transporter,'' lobbied New Jersey's Legislature and others throughout the country."

    So what's the problem? As a result, New Jersey towns have been unable to deal with the latest fad among local teenagers, electric scooters, which they ride on the sidewalks.

    Note that the scooters now terrorizing North Jersey pedestrians are not "assistive devices" that deserve protection by the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)--neither is the Segway. These are vehicles you have to stand up on to drive. But affluent parents who bought these toys for their teens are calling on the protection of the ADA to keep them on the sidewalks and out of traffic. We can expect to see the same with the Segway.

    San Francisco plans to fight back, according to this Examiner article. Senior-citizen activists and walkers protested they don't want to share their space with a 95 lb machine traveling 12 mph. "The whole point of sidewalks is to separate vehicles from pedestrians," says Walk San Francisco director Michael Smith.

    IMO, the Segway is a pyramid scheme waiting to tumble. Early investors put up the cash for a massive publicity and lobbying campaign. They now have until March to lure unsuspecting buyers to buy their Segways, and unsuspecting investors to buy their stock.

    In March it's all over. Once Segways hit the sidewalks, the pyramid crumbles. Whoever has money in Segways in March will take the hits for liability claims that already have class-action lawyers licking their chops. State legislators will quickly rescind Segway laws, and Segway owners will be riding their white elephants in the street--if they feel like admitting they own this year's version of Edsel.

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
    1. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by Cy+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      San Francisco plans to fight back, according to this Examiner article. Senior-citizen activists and walkers protested they don't want to share their space with a 95 lb machine traveling 12 mph.

      Well while they might be mechanically able to travel at 12 or even 14 MPH, if you check the Segway website they are now using a reference speed of just 9 MPH on sidewalks (presumably it would be even less on dirt paths). If anything I think that is too slow.

      Considering marathoners go about 12 MPH, and sprinters go about about 20 MPH and they are both legal on the sidewalk (and most of them weigh over 95 lbs - except the women marathoners) why do they insist on keeping these things so slow if they are supposed to be just as safe as a pedestrians? I never could figure out why they think it will succeed at a speed half of what you can bicycle at comfortably. (Yes, I know bicycles are banned from sidewalks in most places but that is rarely enforced - and bicycles are generally allowed on running paths.)

      The point of the Segway was to reduce the number of cars on the road. Cars kill thousands of pedestrians every year, not to mention reducing air quality and making any activity that requires breathing the air outdoors less pleasant and potentially unhealthy. (Though I guess the greenhouse effect has some net positive effect on providing more walkable days weather wise - assuming you don't want to walk along the beach.)

    2. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Cars kill thousands of pedestrians every year, not to mention reducing air quality and making any activity that requires breathing the air outdoors less pleasant and potentially unhealthy.

      Cars also rush people to hospitals, haul merchandise and contribute to the economy, provide transportation for millions of commuters every day, etc. etc. etc. And don't think recharging those Segway batteries happenes through the magical non-polluting electricity power plant.

      Pollution goes down once people decide to live 5 miles from work, and not 45, and we'll also get a ton of urban planning benefits. Everything else is just shifting pollution from one source to another.

      Side note: I'm surprised this got modded to "insightful" when it seems to just be a promotional Amazon redirect link for commission.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    3. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by HedRat · · Score: 1

      if they feel like admitting they own this year's version of Edsel.

      Edsel would have been a bigger hit if they had put some hair around that vagina shaped grill and called it an "Ethel".

    4. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by nolife · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering marathoners go about 12 MPH, and sprinters go about about 20 MPH and they are both legal on the sidewalk

      Dude, legal maybe but come on.. When have you ever seen someone sprinting 20MPH down a busy sidewalk? I may have come close a few times trying to catch the early bus but that is NOT an easy task. I imagine if more people were actually sprinting down the sidewalk it would become a nuisance and probably illegal.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    5. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      I never could figure out why they think it will succeed at a speed half of what you can bicycle at comfortably. (Yes, I know bicycles are banned from sidewalks in most places but that is rarely enforced - and bicycles are generally allowed on running paths.)

      You must be one of the people that nearly runs over me daily in the process of riding your bicycle down the sidewalk. I wish that the laws in this regard would be enforced a bit more often.

      I also wish that there were more bicycle-only lanes on streets so that cyclists would not feel the need to ride on the sidewalk to be safe from traffic. Actually, this would solve the first problem quite nicely.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    6. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2
      Considering marathoners go about 12 MPH, and sprinters go about about 20 MPH and they are both legal on the sidewalk (and most of them weigh over 95 lbs - except the women marathoners)

      Uhhh... you do realize that you have to count your own body weight onto that 95 lbs... right??
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    7. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      last time I rode my bike on the sidewalk I rode around the people I encountered. the segway is supposed to be as agile as a bike so I don't see the problem. electric scooters should definitely not be on sidewalks as they are difficult to control because of the lower center of gravity. people who ride segways irresponsibly on sidewalks should get tickets. those that don't, won't.

    8. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Slashdotters should worry about Segways-on-sidewalks--not for moral reasons, as you seem to think--but for financial ones. Segway is a *bad* investment, and we are their target.

      The only reason Segways are economically viable right now is that laws have been passed to let them use city sidewalks. Most cities haven't caught on to this yet, and won't catch on until March. But already city officials in both New Jersey and San Francisco are upset about Segways. This is the tip of the iceberg.

      The point of the Segway was to reduce the number of cars on the road.

      Yes, I know that's the hype they've been using in their round-the-country marketing sessions. How unusual, when all the other corporations just try to make money. BTW, what's up with that Buy-Segway-Give-Me-Commission link in your sig?

      --
      Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
    9. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, what's up with that Buy-Segway-Give-Me-Commission link in your sig?

      It allows me to write-off the time I spend on SlashDot as a business expense.

      Why Taco didn't include an affiliate link from the main story write-up I don't know, SlashDot is after all an advertising supported site.

    10. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by Jeremi · · Score: 2
      And don't think recharging those Segway batteries happenes through the magical non-polluting electricity power plant.


      Oh? Why not?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    11. Re:Disaster coming to a sidewalk near you. by bedessen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Considering marathoners go about 12 MPH, and sprinters go about about 20 MPH and they are both legal on the sidewalk

      Lay off the crack. A marathon time of 4:30, which is damn hard, averages out to around 5.5-6 MPH. A 4 minute mile (which is at the world-class freakishly-trained level) is still only 15 MPH.

      I've paced myself at a brisk walk and it's about 3.75 to 4 MPH. Believe me, this is still MUCH faster than most of the pedestrian traffic on the sidewalk. If it's moderately busy (or there is any sort of incline involved), you can forget about being able to even walk briskly, let alone jog or sprint.

      If a thing traveled at 10MPH on the sidewalks, it would be going 3 to 5 times faster than 99% of the foot traffic.

  50. Overhyped? by elliotj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Segway has been criticized mercilessly since it was first revealed. I think this is largely the result of the secrecy surround its development. A great deal of speculation ensued about what it could be, and then when it was launched, people felt let down because they had imagined something more.

    Where else have I seen this? Oh yeah, it happens before every Macworld Expo. It's some kind of clinical condition that relates to people never being satisfied and the grass always looking greener elsewhere.

    Anyway, I think it is pretty stupid to call it overhyped.

    Firstly, the rampant speculation was NOT hype. It was speculation. Hype is when you talk about the great features of a product and how much you want one. Anticipation of the next LoTR movie is hype. Speculation about "IT" or "Ginger" was more like wondering about whether aliens exist.

    Secondly, I think hype can only really be determined after the product is launched to see if it fails to live upto expectations. We have no idea how well the Segway will do. How can we tell whether or not it was overhyped?

    This kind of shooting-from-the-hip editorial commentary fundamentally lowers the level of discussion around here sometimes.

    1. Re:Overhyped? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      "...people felt let down because they had imagined something more"

      "Firstly, the rampant speculation was NOT hype. It was speculation."

      There was real, honest to god, HYPE before they unveiled this thing. There were quotes from famous people "in the know" that were released to the press.

      Steve Jobs - "If enough people see the machine, you won't have to convince them to architect cities around it. It'll just happen."

      Steve Kemper - "[IT will] sweep over the world and change lives, cities, and ways of thinking,"

      Someone at Credit Suisse First Boston (which invested money) said that Kamen would be wealthier than Bill Gates in five years.

      Bob Metcalf called it "more important than the internet."

      That is pure hype. IIRC, two of the big theories for IT where a flying car and a cheap/free power generator for each home. If you hype a product to the point that people are expecting cold fusion or Jetson's cars, and you deliver a scooter, people are going to be pissed and dismissive.

      In a strange twist, ZDnet had an article from August saying that the Segway isn't really Ginger.

      My question from the first second I saw the thing is "Why don't you put a little third wheel on there and lose 3/4ths of the price?" Maybe that's why I'm not a millionaire visionary.

      -B

    2. Re:Overhyped? by dildatron · · Score: 2

      Yeha, this thing was hyped to all hell and back. It seems I heard another rumor that Segway was not even IT, IT ws something else. Which further drives the hype machine. I think all this hype is gay. This thing is certianly NOT more important than the internet.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    3. Re:Overhyped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT is actually a miniature Stirling Engine which you will be able to power your electronic devices with. They will be charged via your body heat, since Kamen's work on Stirlings has resulted in an extremely small temperature differential necessary to create power.

  51. Paris and Scooters... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Paris has always been good for Bikes, Bladers, Scooters et al. The wide pavements, the properly enforced cycle lanes.

    Lots of people Bike/Blade/Scoot to work in Paris because you can and lets face it Paris is a nice place to see as you go. The Scooters allow the suits to zip around with less hassle than blades, but many people still use blades. And while you look a little silly on a Scooter you are still part of some form of sub-culture, and they are not hanging around.

    The Segway makes you look like a muppet. Parisiens will forgive many things, but not looking cool or stylish isn't one of them. This is a city with Policemen trained by the Olympic skating team to be bladers.

    I await to be corrected but somehow I can't imagine 2,000 Segway owners meeting at Bastille on a Sunday afternoon for a great high speed crack around the city. Exercise is cool in Paris, being Fat is very uncool.

    Vive la differance and all that, but Segway will be as popular as American tourists in Paris.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Paris and Scooters... by mr_gerbik · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Vive la differance and all that, but Segway will be as popular as American tourists in Paris.

      I have a more fitting analogy for you...

      Segway will be as popular as a Jew in Paris.

      racist bastards.

      -gerbik

    2. Re:Paris and Scooters... by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      Are american tourists really that unpopular in Paris? Is there anything american tourists can do to be less unpopular? Learning french is probably out, but what about knowing a second language (Ich kanne nicht so gut Deutch sprechen).

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    3. Re:Paris and Scooters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Is there anything american tourists can do to be less unpopular?

      Pretend to be Canadian?

    4. Re:Paris and Scooters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If 2000 Segway riders (thin OR fat) rolled in to Paris, France would surrender.

    5. Re:Paris and Scooters... by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      That would work but just trying to speak a bit of French is enough, usually.

    6. Re:Paris and Scooters... by unixj · · Score: 1

      Sorry but my impression of Paris was exactly the opposite. Narrow sidewalks, and many of them have fruit stands or whatnot on the side. And MANY people, all dodging each other (or mopeds) on the sidewalk. And LOTS of dog excrement, despite the measures they have in place to clean it up. I just can't see using a Segway on the sidewalks of Paris, unless you take it out at 3am.

    7. Re:Paris and Scooters... by jduckworth · · Score: 1

      paris? how about everywhere? its the way that bumble around other countries as if they are sub-sections of disneyland.

    8. Re:Paris and Scooters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps learn the minimum of respect for other peoples nationality ?

      At least stop saying how "We saved your butts in WW2" or "Damn French ! Always running away!"
      That's a start.

      Maybe even learn a few French phrases to introduce onesself.

      Here are a couple of resources for you...

      http://www.frenchvillas.com/etiquette.htm
      http: //www.usatoday.com/life/enter/movies/movie955 .htm
      http://www.transparent.com/languagepages/fre nch/Fr Phrases.htm

      Enjoy

  52. Can't wait by papasui · · Score: 2

    I can't wait until someone tries a ride-by on one of those and falls off :) I'll be watching the news.

  53. Maybe believe the hype. Cautiously. by Ninja+Master+Gara · · Score: 1
    Regardless of the hype, the Segway generates buzz and has interest. This is it's first real opportunity to generate sales since the auction early this year reached 6 figures ($160,000 was the highest paid), and another (possibly fake) auction on ebay reached $14,000 before it was shut down.

    It'll be interesting to see how it does, like it or hate it.

    --

    ---
    When I grow up, I want to be a kid again.
  54. I want the following improvements. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While the Segway sounds like a great idea, I'll wait for the following improvements:

    1. The weight of the unit has to come down. The current 65 pound weight is a bit much to carry up and down staircases.

    2. The unit should be collapsible, so you it makes it much easier to carry on and off means of public transport (trains, trolleys, buses and ferries).

    3. The cost has to be much lower than now.

    I really hope a company like Dahon (famous for its folding bicycles) will work with Kamen and develop something akin to a Segway that weighs no more than 25-27 pounds, folds and/or collapses to a manageable size, and costs no more than US$2,000 to start and then lower the cost as technology improves.

    1. Re:I want the following improvements. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2
      The weight of the unit has to come down. The current 65 pound weight is a bit much to carry up and down staircases.

      Isn't it supposed to be able to climb stairs as well?

    2. Re:I want the following improvements. by ek_adam · · Score: 3, Informative

      1. The weight of the unit has to come down. The current 65 pound weight is a bit much to carry up and down staircases.
      Follow mode is a power-assist mode for getting it up stairs or over rough terrain. On the other hand, the weight could still be a problem for getting it into a car trunk or up to the first step of the commuter train I take each morning.
    3. Re:I want the following improvements. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, the weight could still be a problem for getting it into a car trunk or up to the first step of the commuter train I take each morning.

      Given Segway's 65-pound weight, people are NOT going to be thrilled to carry that thing through public transit stations. Many transit stations have steep stairways that is beyond the capabilities of Segway, I'm sorry to say. :-( Also, it's inability to fold and/or collapse to a manageable size could result in the same restrictions that limit the loading of regular bicycles on buses, trains, trolleys and ferries.

      By eventually building a transporter with Segway-like functions into something that weighs 25-27 pounds at most and fold and/or collapse into something smaller than most folding bicycles, you can easily carry it through transit stations and will not impede other public transit riders.

    4. Re:I want the following improvements. by dildatron · · Score: 3, Funny

      But you forgot that cities will automatically redesign themselves around the segway!

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
  55. huh? by tps12 · · Score: 2

    It's also the most overhyped and overpriced toy ever, and I'm kicking myself for posting it since that just contributes to the problem.

    Why the sudden change in policy? Or is Segway just not paying you?

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  56. Eh? What C5? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 0, Troll
    What's wrong with the Citroen C5, I'm not a big fan of french cars (prefer cars coming from Ingolstad) but I've seen a few of those on the roads here.

    Or is there another C5, I'm not a aware of. (Of course if you meant the Renault Vel-Satis, that's another discussion *grin*)

  57. Oh well, it's only Karma... by moonboy · · Score: 4, Insightful



    "It's also the most overhyped and overpriced toy ever, and I'm kicking myself for posting it since that just contributes to the problem."

    Yeah, far be it from you to listen to your loyal readership who take the time and effort to search the Internet for "Stuff that Matters" to others than just yourself at the same time helping to make your bottom line look a little better.

    Overhyped and overpriced is certainly your opinion which I could personally do without. Do you know how much it costs to make one of these? Do you know the specifics of the R & D went into these? I think not.

    Do you realize how fantastic an achievement in technology this is? Well, I guess not if you think it's just a "toy". (BTW, Nice lame-ass attempt to trivialize it.) The engineering that went into creating a device that balances the human body while moving forward, backward and turning and most importantly anticipates sudden movements to maintain that balance is fantastic!

    Perhaps more important (and certainly undervalued by many) are the potential advances that this type of technology could lead to that we can't foresee right now. (Like this wheelchair that Kamen also invented.

    For a nerd who supposedly likes anime, science- fiction, technology, etc. You seem just a little negative and short-sighted.

    But of course, these are just my opinions.

    --

    Co-founder and designer at Music Nearby: http://musicnearby.com
  58. textbook example of the debilitating effects of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..jealousy.

    It's ok, little child, you can re-apply for a visa at any time. The denial was nothing personal. Or maybe it was, if you acted like that.

    1. Re:textbook example of the debilitating effects of by praedor · · Score: 2

      Heh. Please wipe off the special McD's sauce from your fingers before operating your computer, you are writing gibberish.


      I fully intend to waste my money on an ultralite, not a silly toy meant to make fat, lazy people fatter and lazier.


      That clown who devised the segway has a couple of REAL useful inventions, one of which lead to the breech baby segway: a wheelchair capable of going up and down stairs and other useful things. His other invention (still in the works) is a Sterling-engine-driven power generator and water purifier (about the size of a large tower case).


      THESE are useful. The seqway is for lazy fat idiots, fat lazy wannabes, or people with more money than sense. The segway is doomed and overhyped. Beat cops and mail deliverers, mark my words. After the first few mega lawsuits due to snotnosed punks or lazy fat asses plowing down Grandma and Grandpa on a sidewalk (or plowing over little Suzy), the segway will be a gonner.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  59. easy to steal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let's say a group of punk kids decides they want your Segway. How are you supposed to stop them from taking it? You can't outrun them on it, and it's unlikely that you'll be able to carry that thing and run off. and you can't stand your ground and fight them: they're young and quicker than you. $5000 down the drain.

  60. Droolware by kabanossen · · Score: 1

    Hype or no hype there's only one term for this. It's DROOLWARE. I mean look at the description of the technology, it's... I lack words... must try... this thing... must... droool.

  61. I searched the page so I know it hasnt been said: by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!! !

    And now I type this sentance to avoid the filter :)

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  62. That costs more than my car! by Matimus · · Score: 1

    about 2.5 times as much as I paid for my car. (granted I have a crappy car) $5000 and this thing doesn't even go fast eanough to catch air. Im sure somebody could come up with a hack, even so, I would rather have a $5000 bicycle than this thing.

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
  63. For that price.. by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...I could buy a top of the line custom built titanium bike and have money to spare. The bike would be smaller, lighter, cheaper, easier to maintain, not run out of power, go faster, access more places and give people exercise. Ooops! I said the nasty E word, exercise!

    Seriously, it's amazing how much money can be made off of human laziness. People are willing to pay 5000$, along with the effort of maintaining these things, to not have to move their legs

    1. Re:For that price.. by vidarh · · Score: 2

      I don't have a problem with getting reasonable excercise (though I must admit to not liking it). What I like about the HT is the possibility of using it reasonably safely on a crowded sidewalk, and at the same time extending the effective range I'd be able to travel without going by tube etc. 2-3 times. If you've ever been on the tube in London during rush hours, you might understand why ;) Then you might also understand why I wouldn't want to be on a bike - London traffic is horrible.

    2. Re:For that price.. by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      I think it's a mistake to say people will pay $5000 to avoid excercise; nobody is going to be paying $5000 except the very early adopters, and those literally ARE the people who'll be using them as toys. When it hits the consumer level in price, THEN it might be fair to say people are paying to avoid excercise, but it'll be at $800 or something, not $5000.

    3. Re:For that price.. by endoboy · · Score: 1

      FWIW, a bike is not smaller....

      One of the most important aspects of the segway design is that its footprint is not significantly larger that that of a pedestrian... A bike is 4 to five feet long, and the same width; nearly triple the size

    4. Re:For that price.. by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      ...I could buy a top of the line custom built titanium bike and have money to spare. The bike would be smaller, lighter, cheaper, easier to maintain, not run out of power, go faster, access more places and give people exercise. Ooops! I said the nasty E word, exercise!

      Seriously, it's amazing how much money can be made off of human laziness.


      Do you own a car? Yes? Then please shut up.

      People are willing to pay 5000$, along with the effort of maintaining these things, to not have to move their legs

      I think people are willing to pay $5000 because the technology is cool, they can zip around from point A to B without expending too much energy, thereby allowing them expend more energy at points A and B, or hell, after work at the local pickup game of basketball.

      In other words, maybe we all don't enjoy riding bikes?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    5. Re:For that price.. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      amen brother.

      anyplace a "segway" can be used or for any task it can be used for a bike can easly do more efficiently. deliveries? i've had a bike trailer for over 4 years now... try carting 100 pounds of video gear around macinac island for 8 hours with a segway. waterproof.. my bike can be thrown into the lake and continue to operate... segway? has anyone thrown one in the water, let it submerge and then ride it out? how about even ride it after that?

      segway is only for people to try and look like doctor evil riding down the road.. I'm betting they come with a free cupon for a silver jacket and a hairless sphinx cat.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:For that price.. by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      What people do is buy 'labor saving' devices, then turn around and pay more to go to a gym to work off the fat.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    7. Re:For that price.. by Anitra · · Score: 1
      Seriously, it's amazing how much money can be made off of human laziness.

      Do you own a car? Yes? Then please shut up.


      You must live in a big city. That's not an option for all of us. And if you don't live in a big city with great public transportation, you need a car - to get just about anywhere more than a mile or so away from your house - especially in below-freezing weather, which is common up here in the north.

      My point - for most people, a car is NECESSARY. Now, it wasn't always that way, but it is now. A Segway is NOT necessary, and in its current iteration, never will be. (It needs to go farther and take less time to charge.)
      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    8. Re:For that price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So people want their excersize when and where and in the form the desire, nothing wrong with that.

    9. Re:For that price.. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      At 1/4 the price of a Segway HT, I can get a very nice regular bicycle AND a Dahon Boardwalk 6 for commuting (especially if you have to use public transport during commuting).

  64. $495 deposit? by Boone^ · · Score: 2

    You get the feeling that the $495 deposit covers the cost of the raw materials of the machine, then the rest of the $5000 deals with assembly labor and profit?

    1. Re:$495 deposit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, do you actually think you ever pay for mostly raw materials?

  65. Segway promotion going too far by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was wondering why the digitally remastered "Easy Rider" DVD I bought from Amazon had Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda riding around on scooters. I had figured it was just the director's cut.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  66. unbelievably dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I simply can't believe they are going to allow these to be used on sidewalks. They take up extra space and if the user looses control, especially in windy weather, they could take someones eye out. They are totally unsuitable to busy streets, they make it hard to see where you are going and make you look stupid. Hold on... I thought we were talking about unbrellas.

    Seriously though, the talk about people being hurt by Segway riders is small thinking. Sure, there is potential risk. But what about the people *not* killed because drivers are using their Segway instead of their 8mpg 8cylinder SUV?

  67. Interesting, but seems logical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without a way shift balance (which would usually be your body) the only way for a segway to keep itself straight is to rely on air resistance as a damping effect on oscillations. The air resistance would be the only thing keeping the system stable ... intuitively Id say that without a human the system is very poorly damped. Any velocity at all will take a long time to be diminished, which is nasty in a gusty wind.

    I think the human is an integral part in making the segway stable while stationary, gyros alone cant do it AFAICS.

    1. Re:Interesting, but seems logical by endoboy · · Score: 1

      a) you have no clue what you're talking about
      b) you have no clue about physics
      c) gyro based servo control does not rely on air resistance for damping

  68. Opinion of those who have ridden one? by jackjumper · · Score: 1

    I'm curious. Of the lucky ones who have ridden a Segway, how many think they're too dangerous to be on sidewalks? I've ridden one and my feeling is that they are *so* intuitive that they aren't any more dangerous than, say, a jogger. Certainly much safer than bicycles.

    So lets hear from those that have...

    1. Re:Opinion of those who have ridden one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's also hear how they stop on ice, wet leaves, on sand and in puddles.

    2. Re:Opinion of those who have ridden one? by llamaboy123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity to ride a Segway last April. It was by far one of the most amazing things I have ever had the oppurtunity to experience. I was only able to ride it for about 15 min. And after about 3 minutes it is already more natural that walking. Those who have placed all these posts bad mouthing it should wait till they get the oppurtunity to ride one. After that I am sure that most of their opinions will change. If I wasn't a poor student I would have ordered one early this morning.

    3. Re:Opinion of those who have ridden one? by Chaswell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have not ridden one, but I was very impressed with how Disney employees managed them in very heavy crowds. They were able to zip around and through some of the heaviest of gawking tourists (toughest kind of crowd) without any issues. If Disney trusts them not to cause lawsuits, I think that says a LOT!

    4. Re:Opinion of those who have ridden one? by Gaurang · · Score: 1

      but I was very impressed with how Disney employees managed them in very heavy crowds.

      This strikes me....it would be great if these are kept for public use within amusement parks like Disneyland, Universal Studios and the like....

      Walking from one end of the park to another is darn inconvenient and a waste of time!!!

      (And dont tell me the park owners cannot afford to have some dozens lying around -people might come to the park to enjoy those ;) )

      --
      I have found a solution to Riemann's Hypothesis, but have run out of spac
  69. I wonder how long until... by mschoolbus · · Score: 2, Funny

    we start seeing engine upgrades and battery upgrades, maybe even the computer chip upgrades. A whole new generation of extreme sports will be created! I can't wait to pull a superman off some motocross jump on 'IT'! You guys just wait!!!

  70. What Does Segway Mean by Flagbrew · · Score: 1

    I certainly am no english language whiz, however I always thought the word was spelled "segue":

    segue \SEG-way; SAYG-way\, verb:
    To proceed without interruption; to make a smooth transition.

    A little word I picked up at Dead shows. You know, "space segue wharf rat", something like that.

  71. And when it rains? by gobbledok · · Score: 1

    Imagine being caught in an electrical storm with your own personal lighting rod!

    Mmmmm, lightning...

    --
    47 Meelion Dollars!?! I'm the cat!
    1. Re:And when it rains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lightning rod... right. Think of all those poor motorists though!

    2. Re:And when it rains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, Since when did Plastic (since the segway is covered in it) become conductive?

      It never ceases to amaze me at how Uniformed people always are quick to PROVE they dont anything about what they are offering an opinion on!

  72. What happens when you crash into something? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    What happens when you crash into something, or when there is a computer failure, and the Segway stops working? Why is it that no one mentions the word death?

    1. Re:What happens when you crash into something? by Madmanz123 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because death is a part of travel. We drive cars that kill thousands a year, you die crossing the streat, tripping and all that. Everything has a risk value. This one doesn't seem to be any greater.

    2. Re:What happens when you crash into something? by William+Tanksley · · Score: 2

      Why dop you think that the Segway has multiple redundant control systems, computers, sensors...?

      Good objection, but wrong object. The Segway is almost certainly MUCH safer than running.

      -Billy

  73. Funny. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Funny. Nice description of a car.

    1. Re:Funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't describing a car. Look again and reply when you understand.

  74. You have to Ride it to Believe it by Jason+Mark · · Score: 1

    If you get on one of these things, you end up with this shit-eating grin that you just can't stop. It's amazingly intuitive.. even my grandparents could use it. Very cool and fun. It blows away any "scooter" on the market.. and honestly it's no bigger than a person standing. You can turn on a dime, because the wheels spin independantly. I watched some guy smack into another guy while going pretty fast, and they were both fine. It was sort of like someone was jogging and bumped into someone. Sure that can hurt, but unless someone gets tossed under the wheels of a car, no one will get killed.

    1. Re:You have to Ride it to Believe it by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      And how long until that bump results in someone getting tossed under the wheels of a car, resulting in legal action?

      I'm sure they are fun to ride. I would hope any $5000 yuppie scooter would be fun to ride. While the electronics are great, the concept of small wheeled vehicle is not new, and if it wasn't for the hype of the IPO crowd wanting in on the action this wouldn't be getting the attention it is. I'll look again when they cost $250 (or whatever a bicycle costs these days).

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    2. Re:You have to Ride it to Believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about when you are walking/running and knock someone under the wheels of a car? Will there be a big lawsuit and a goverment crackdown on walking?

    3. Re:You have to Ride it to Believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you'll just get your ass in the slammer.

  75. Legislation and other vehicles by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    I really hope that the states allowing(requiring) these things to be ridden on the sidewalks doesn't bleed over into the bicycle world.

    Bikes are much too fast to mix with peds safely. The speed and maneuverability are too different. But they may eventually get lumped in with these Seg's as "non-cars", and be required to use the sidewalk. Then the already declining bike use will drop even farther. And we will get fatter and fatter.

    Even the Seg is too big and fast for a crowded sidewalk. "Just like being hit by a pedestrian" doesn't begin to convey the kinetic energy behind a 320 lb lump hitting you at 12 mph. Roll right over most people.

    1. Re:Legislation and other vehicles by WEFUNK · · Score: 5, Informative

      Even the Seg is too big and fast for a crowded sidewalk. "Just like being hit by a pedestrian" doesn't begin to convey the kinetic energy behind a 320 lb lump hitting you at 12 mph. Roll right over most people.

      I believe the same active control system used to balance the Segway is also used to cushion any impact with other objects/people/Segways. They've demonstrated this a few times on TV with Segways bumping into people or into each other at speed. The Segway(s) stop on a dime (or even deflect/bounce off) without upsetting the balance of either party. They also have soft tires for similar safety reasons.

      So the comment "just like being hit by a pedestrian" is proportedly accurate as long as the contact isn't due to system failure or the wheels leaving the ground (in which case the effective kinetic energy would suddenly become as described). This is actually one of the major features of the device - it probably wouldn't have been produced if this wasn't true.

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
    2. Re:Legislation and other vehicles by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

      The computer evidently senses a contact on the handlebars and stops or reverses the motor. But, physics does not allow for an instantaneous stop of that much mass. And even then, the rider is under no such control. He is still moving at the original speed.

      Read further for other groups concerns:
      http://www.icdri.org/News/segwayacb.htm
      http://www.walkboston.org/jcps.htm
      http://prometheus-music.com/eli/segway.html
      "The National Safety Council has determined that the average reaction time for an emergency braking situation is three-quarters of a second. At even 12 mph, a Segway would therefore travel an average of 13 feet before the user would even initiate braking. Segway claims that the device could then be stopped in an additional 5 feet (which would be a remarkable 1g of deceleration if true) for a total stopping distance of 18 feet. Again, this would be completely unsafe for sidewalk use."

      How is the Seg different from a motorized bicycle? In almost all respects, they are quite similar. Wheels, motor, weight, speed.
      And for good reason, we don't allow motorized bicycles(underpowered mopeds) on sidewalks. Motors and peds do not mix well.

      Don't get me wrong. I think the Seg is a cool application of technology. But I have my doubts about mixing well on a crowded sidewalk.

    3. Re:Legislation and other vehicles by vidarh · · Score: 2
      First of all, with a Segway the user doesn't need to react before initiating braking. On impact, you are being pushed back, shifting your center of gravity, and the Segway will detect that and reverse it's engine. That is, unless your reflexes have already unconsciously made you shift backwards and start braking.

      Since the Segway is leaning forwards initially, you also don't take the full impact right away. You get hit by the first part of the device, it starts reversing, and as the rest of you starts hitting you it will already be braking.

      On the other hand, a person running or cycling at the same speed will likely hit you full on at full speed and will be leaning forward and have their center of gravity well in front of their feet, leaving you to take their entire momentum.

    4. Re:Legislation and other vehicles by hyperturbopete · · Score: 1

      Contact with other people would be like getting hit by an (american) football player on roller blades :-)

      A segway will move in approximately the same way as a man on roller blades (wearing a 65 lb pack on his lower body). Zero turning radius is bullshit except at low speed.

      It would work pretty well totally un-crowded sidewalks. Not sure how it would handle curbs (can you jump? you would have to slow down then.)

      On city streets around here, bladers often have to go on the road to get room - and the segway is not meant for roads. That said, it is a cool and futuristic idea.

      The time WILL come eventually for a device like it. But i'm thinking more of a hovering / flying device :-)

    5. Re:Legislation and other vehicles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > On impact, you are being pushed back, shifting your center of gravity, and the Segway will detect that and reverse it's engin

      On impact, it is too late

  76. The English C5 was a plastic electric car. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    The English C5 was a plastic electric car. The design ignored the fact that plastic develops cracks when flexed often. It was quirky in the English tradition. It died immediately after introduction.

    1. Re:The English C5 was a plastic electric car. by palutke · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing that out. The only C5 I could think of was the cargo plane, and I was having trouble understanding the comparison between a scooter and a 800,000-pound airplane.

      --
      'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
    2. Re:The English C5 was a plastic electric car. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Well, and I just thought of a car. I suspected it wouldn't be that, but it was my way of asking. *sigh*
      I've never heard of the English C5, either. Anybody got a link?

    3. Re:The English C5 was a plastic electric car. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      I've never heard of the English C5, either. Anybody got a link?

      It was a failed electric scooter thingy by the same company that made the little Sinclair computer. Here's a fan site for the Sinclair C5. You can google "Sinclair C5" for more.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:The English C5 was a plastic electric car. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      that first link shows a girl riding that little C5 thing with a shoulder seatbelt on. If that thing gets hit and starts rolling she is *dead* she is tethered to that thing with no helmet - and *no* structure around her upper body to protect her in the event of a tip/roll/whatever.

      Read: Deathtrap!

    5. Re:The English C5 was a plastic electric car. by FlexAgain · · Score: 1

      that first link shows a girl riding that little C5 [nvg.ntnu.no] thing with a shoulder seatbelt on. If that thing gets hit and starts rolling she is *dead* she is tethered to that thing with no helmet - and *no* structure around her upper body to protect her in the event of a tip/roll/whatever.

      Probably because it was covered under the legislation for Electrically Powerer Cycles (which included trikes). They have fairly stringent limitations on weight, any sort of metal roll cage would almost certainly exceed those and put it into the category of motorcycle (or moped).

      That aside, no pushbike (or motorcycle) I've ever seen has a roll cage either, and I have serious doubts about the overall safety advantages of helmets, but that is another discussion altogether.

      --
      Actually it is rocket science...
    6. Re:The English C5 was a plastic electric car. by ZBM-2 · · Score: 1
      That looks like a reflective belt,not a seatbelt. The Brit motorcycle cops used to wear the same thing.

      --
      ==== Warning:this poster contains subject matter that may be offensive. Flaming discretion is advised.
  77. Xtreme Segway by farfisa69 · · Score: 1

    How long til we see Xtreme videos of dudes doing jumps, riding in halfpipes, and generally filthing it up?

    --
    Meat is murder, I eat chicken.
  78. Weight Limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the specs the thing can carry up to a 250 lb person, is it just me or is that a tad limiting, especially considering the current weight situation in America.

    Anyone know if they're coming out with a bigger one for Shaquille O'Neil and myself?

  79. Interesting Phenomenon by nukey56 · · Score: 1

    I took a look at that gallery, and noticed that the first, second, and last pictures were viewed more frequently than all the rest. Could this kind of behaviour explain the prevalance of cowboyneal votes?

  80. Gyroscopes - a danger? by Pastey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Something I've been wondering about here...

    I recall a few years back a friend of mine telling me a story about his experiences in the military. He did aircraft maintenance on a number of different craft.

    Apparently, many of them make use of extremely high RPM gyroscopes in their on board guidance systems. While I don't recall the technical specs, I do remember him telling me that there were specific regulations for how long you had to wait after the aircraft was powered down before you were allowed to begin servicing the systems. Otherwise, there was a very real danger to both the mechanic and the machine. He related that on one occasion he and his team waited the regulated time period and then began to disassemble the planes systems. As they removed the housing with the gyroscope and began to lower it to the tarmack it suddenly flew from there hands and took off - thereby destroying itself. They were all a bit shaken and one of the long time crew chiefs remarked, "Guess that was a good one" because it still hadn't come to a stop.


    Now the SegWay supposedly uses, "aircraft quality gyroscopes" for balance and control. If these are powerful enough to keep an adult human upright they must be spinning at a terrific RPM. What are the dangers involved in this? That is to say if someone on one of these were to be struck by a car, would one of these gyros take off and remove some unfortunate soul's head?

    1. Re:Gyroscopes - a danger? by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would suggest that you look at the various links that show "How a Segway works".

      The gyros are made of micro machined silicon and weigh a fraction of a gram. They also don't spin but vibrate instead. They are used only as measurement devices with the balancing being produced by driving the wheels via a feedback mechanism.

      These people designed the sensor (and I used to work there though not on this project)

      --
      wot no sig
    2. Re:Gyroscopes - a danger? by jeff_bond · · Score: 3, Informative
      Now the SegWay supposedly uses, "aircraft quality gyroscopes" for balance and control. If these are powerful enough to keep an adult human upright they must be spinning at a terrific RPM. What are the dangers involved in this? That is to say if someone on one of these were to be struck by a car, would one of these gyros take off and remove some unfortunate soul's head?

      The gyroscopes do not contain rotating masses in the conventional sense. They are solid state "vibrating ring" gyros that use the coriolis effect to measure rotational speed (from here). Its the powerful motors that keep the balance, not the mass in the gyroscopes, they are simply the sensors.

      Jeff

      --
      stty erase ^H
  81. Stale crusty old news by SpinyNorman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It wasn't even news yesterday.

    * 2002-11-18 19:46:46 Segway $4,950 at Amazon - 3/2003 delivery (articles,news) (rejected)

  82. How the media creates a story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's also the most overhyped and overpriced toy ever, and I'm kicking myself for posting it since that just contributes to the problem.

    Gawd, if that's Taco's idea of a problem, he must have billions of them.

  83. I see these things all the time... by Sc00ter · · Score: 5, Informative
    I live in Manchester, NH, where Segway and Deka are located. I see Dean Kaman's helicopter every so often as he commutes to and from work...

    As a result I see these all the time.. average is about 2-3 a day. Now a lot of you are saying what's the point, they're stupid, use a bike, use a car.. For Manchester they are very well suited. We have this long strip downtown.. going from one end to the other is a pain by car (lots of traffic, lights, no parking) going by bike sucks since you can't bike on the sidewalk (unsafe, and I'll get to that later) and if you only have 30mins for lunch then you probably can't walk to your favorite lunch place and back in that time (Even more so now that Capri burnt down).

    The Segway is great for this task and that's what most people use them for, going to work further then 2-3 miles but not to far, getting lunch, and doing in city things.

    As far as the safety thing.. I don't care how good you are on a bike you can't stop on a dime if you'er going at a good speed.. Until you actually see it in person you can't fully understand, but I saw a guy (from Deka) going down the side walk at probably 8-10mph.. he got to the intersection and STOPED, on a dime, because you have to lean back to make it stop you are already adjusting your center of balance, if you stopped that quickly on a bike you would either flip over the handle bars or wipe out. This is why a segway is safer.

    You go to your friends house and he lives up a flight of stairs? you get off, stand next to your segway, it a button on it and it will walk itself up the stairs (you can't be on it because of the extream angle it's at)

    Over all they're cool, I would get one and use it to get to work (about 7-8 miles) rather then drive my car. I would have never used it when I was living in Goffstown (next town over, small town) since there wasn't anything of interest for about 20 miles around me.. And if I lived in the building above where I worked, or a few blocks away, sure I would probably walk rather then use this, but not if I was 3 miles or more away.

    With all this being said, I still can't wait to see how they are in the snow :)

    1. Re:I see these things all the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're riding a bike you don't ride on the sidewalk, dummy.

    2. Re:I see these things all the time... by Myco · · Score: 2
      You go to your friends house and he lives up a flight of stairs? you get off, stand next to your segway, it a button on it and it will walk itself up the stairs

      I had been wondering about that one -- thanks for answering it for me, finally. It sounds like it would be cool to watch.

    3. Re:I see these things all the time... by comatose6032 · · Score: 1

      ManchesterWireless.org !! screw segways. "im dean kamen, i wear demin. aint i cool!" "buy my scoota!"

    4. Re:I see these things all the time... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      I see Dean Kaman's helicopter every so often as he commutes to and from work...

      Maybe he should develop a personal helicopter that everyone can use to get to and from work like he does...!

      Elitist prick.

    5. Re:I see these things all the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the streets in Manchester? Or any other New England city? If you ride on the street, you take your life in your hands...

    6. Re:I see these things all the time... by quitcherbitchen · · Score: 1

      ...going by bike sucks since you can't bike on the sidewalk (unsafe, and I'll get to that later)...

      As far as the safety thing.. I don't care how good you are on a bike you can't stop on a dime if you'er going at a good speed.. Until you actually see it in person you can't fully understand, but I saw a guy (from Deka) going down the side walk at probably 8-10mph.. he got to the intersection and STOPED, on a dime, because you have to lean back to make it stop you are already adjusting your center of balance, if you stopped that quickly on a bike you would either flip over the handle bars or wipe out. This is why a segway is safer.

      You're right, riding a bike on a sidewalk isn't safe. It probably has more to do with overall maneuverability than stopping power.

      I'm sure I could stop my bike just as fast/faster than a Segway at 8-10mph. Those things weigh 80lbs! The tire footprint is probably about the same as a bike. You can also adjust your center of balance on a bike and are supposed to in braking. Look at a pro mountain biker going downhill for an extreme example. And for the price tag on a Segway you could buy a bike with disc brakes that would stop a 900lb gorilla.

      And let me just inject my opinion that while the world can always use more free time and safety, another excuse to put off exercise is not what we need. I know plenty of people that stand on escalators, take the subway just a few blocks, and take cabs the rest of the distance. Personally I think a bike or possibly a public transit option is more in the public interest.

    7. Re:I see these things all the time... by dildatron · · Score: 2

      and how exactly will it walk with just two wheels on the same axle? I think the parent is thinking of the wheel-chair with the same concept which had two axels.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    8. Re:I see these things all the time... by dildatron · · Score: 2

      I agree that he may be an elitist, but if I had tons of money to blow and shit, I would drive a helicopter to work too. what's wrong with people spending their own money? He is not a prick just because he has more than you or I.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    9. Re:I see these things all the time... by Snowbeam · · Score: 1

      So what is the Anti-theft system like? Wait, does it have one? Is it easier for a bike to be stolen or your Segway?

      --
      I am Lord Snowbeam. Heed my call!
    10. Re:I see these things all the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The anti-theft system is already in place
      - The damn thing weighs 90 pounds!

    11. Re:I see these things all the time... by e_n_d_o · · Score: 2

      if you stopped that quickly on a bike you would either flip over the handle bars or wipe out.

      First, please note my slashdot username. It's well earned. :)

      A mountain bike with decent brakes will in fact outstop darn near anything. You just have to know how to do it.

      You have to get your ass behind the seat with your CG as low as possible and modulate the front brake if your pitch angle begins to become a problem. Directional control in a full-out stop is accomplished as much with weight shifting as it is with handlebar angle. In reality this procedure takes practice to get right, and most people who don't really enjoy riding will never bother to learn.

    12. Re:I see these things all the time... by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      No, I'm not, I've seen that.. With the segway you stand next to it and hit a button.. that's kinda hard to do in a wheelchair.

      You have to pull it a little, but it has enough torque to basically pull itself up the stairs with little effort (that and very grippy tires)

    13. Re:I see these things all the time... by Snowbeam · · Score: 1

      Cars weigh more and thieves still go for them. The point is, these things have wheels and no thief will resist such a take ;)

      --
      I am Lord Snowbeam. Heed my call!
  84. Overhyped and pricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe the AIBO is even more outrageous seen from a usefulness per money aspect, however there are many more serious disadvantages with such a high price (as any bike-owners in big cities knows).

    What kind of munchkin-LOCK are you going to use on a 5 GRAND personal vehicle??? Where're you going to put it so it remains safe? As a bike-owner, I recall I once strolled in a bookstore for 5 minutes. Once I got out, my locked-down bike was a total goner. The thieves never got caught.

    Of course, a segway will attract attention, which may scare off some thieves. But are you willing to bet nobody is going to try?

    Then there is sabotage and rampage, you better have a special insurance for this baby..

    1. Re:Overhyped and pricy by HedRat · · Score: 1

      Then there is sabotage and rampage, you better have a special insurance for this baby..

      And maybe you'd want to consider LoJack, airbags and NorthStar.

    2. Re:Overhyped and pricy by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      I'd say that sabotage is the major concern. Sure, stealing is always a problem: but it sounds like these things are a pain in the ass to get working without the right key to activate the computer. I could see people figuring out how to hack it, but not your average theif. But imagine some jerk with a bat: boom. 5000 down the drain.

    3. Re:Overhyped and pricy by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      ..of course you'll have it insured, and it will be licensed like every other vehicle on the *ROAD* right...?

  85. Buy one now... by shift8key · · Score: 1

    ...because it will soon disappear and turn into a collector's item.

  86. Overhyped? No. by foo+fighter · · Score: 5, Informative

    I guess I'm the only person here who doesn't think the Segway has been overhyped.

    This is an incredible product that realistically could change have a big impact on the way cities are planned and the way lives are lived.

    The grumps who are wailing "what about us poor schmoes on the sidewalks" haven't taken a close look at the thing or thought about it very hard.

    Barelling down the sidewalk at 17mph is like running full-bore. Whether you are traveling that speed on foot or on a seque it is still poor social ettiquette. People don't drive their cars 80mph down 25mph residential streets. Why will they start to careen down sidewalks?

    I could see cities bolstering their bike-police force. It's no problem for a reasonably healthly person to bike at least 17mph. They'll help enforce safe sidewalk laws.

    Well, that's looking at the social aspects of the machine.

    Looking at it as a geek I'm in total-fucking-awe of what they've done. They've simulated the inner-ear for all intents and purposes. The machine is rugged, polution free (ignoring manufacturing wastes), and it is really reasonably priced. I'm willing to bet in a year or so these will be available for ~$2000. That's only slightly higher than the price of a decent road, mountain, or commuter bike.

    I saw Dean Kamen a couple weeks back. He was up in North Dakota for one of our Technology Conferences. He focused more on his pet project of more, better science and math education but he did have a seque along. I came away convinced the seque could be a year-round commuter vehicle in our larger cities. If it's good enough for North Dakota in the winter it's damn well good enough for the rest of the country year round.

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:Overhyped? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "~$2000. That's only slightly higher than the price of a decent road, mountain, or commuter bike"

      What crack are you smokin'???? Your statement above totally invalidates any legitmate argument you had.... cause if you're willing to say a "decent" bike can be had for about $2000.00 US dollars, you can say anything that flies out your ass.

      2000.00 for a bike will get you: titanium frame, Shimano XT components, high-end consumer Mavic rims, etc, etc... (mtn bike example) for road bikes at that price you can get a TREK or Cannondale RACE bike fer chrissakes.

      lay off the crack next time before posting.

    2. Re:Overhyped? No. by cmpalmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. It is overpriced (but that is a Catch 22 -- the price will come down when they sell a lot, they'll sell a lot when the price comes down), but the technology embodied in it is amazing. It's funny to think that the Looney Tunes/Jetsons single wheeled robots may be closer to reality that really good walking robots.

      I also agree that, while Kamen himself may not be the super genius that the hype would have us believe, the Edison style invention factory he has created at DEKA is a cool idea and I really hope they make it big with something (either the Segway, the new Stirling engine, or something). I think it is encouraging that someone is doing inventive research without a business plan.

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  87. Re:I agree completely - not me. by Havokmon · · Score: 2
    It's also the most overhyped and overpriced toy ever, and I'm kicking myself for posting it since that just contributes to the problem.
    Why did you post it then?

    No kidding, but personally I think this could potentially be useful for my 85yr old grandmother. Of course, we'd actually have to try it out first. You don't just throw grandma up there and say 'lean forward!' - ZOOM! There goes grandma.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  88. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truest damn thing I've read all day. Even if it won't "go," it only weighs 70lbs, easy to run off with.

  89. To make this truly useful they need to do 2 things by StressGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1) Bring the price down about an order of magnitude.
    |
    2) Design it so that it can be collapsed down to
    where a commuter can easily take it with them on a bus/ train.
    |
    |
    | ...until then, all they have is an expensive toy.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  90. Two notes: by frunch · · Score: 1

    1 - 83 POUNDS!! 83 F'ing POUNDS!!
    2 - 5 MILES!! 5 F'ing MILES!! (Under "strenuous" conditions, which include riding on grass or uphill.)

  91. And I thought "Bike Cops" were funny... by Nobody's+Hero · · Score: 1

    Did you see the picture of the two cops riding along on these things? I already routinely point and laugh at bicycle cops. I'd probably fall over in luaghter if I saw these guys riding towards me!

    "they're very slowly gaining on us...quick get a taxi!"

    --
    The Only Person Willing to be Me is ME!
  92. HT!? by distributed.karma · · Score: 2

    Segway has hyperthreading! Wow, I gotta get one now! How many megahurts will it give you?

    --

    --
    If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  93. Warranty? by MikeyO · · Score: 2

    There is no mention of a warranty anywhere. This would kinda worry me if i was going to be plopping down 5Gs on a device which hasn't had too much field testing.

  94. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well done. You got the joke.

  95. This will be really cool- by sielwolf · · Score: 2

    Until somebody steals it and then you have that 5k dream.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  96. WPI by mary_will_grow · · Score: 1

    My alma mater is famous for two things:
    Dean Kamen's (A WPI non-graduate) "IT"

    and the Wachusett Brewery ("WPI Engineered")

    Personally, I'll take the beer.

    --
    Why stick up for big business?
  97. Re:Funny. QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Congratulations! You got the joke!

    Who says Slashdotters are morons? Not me!

    And I'll just bet you're a million laughs at parties, you sly dog!

  98. Anticipated.. by nolife · · Score: 1

    "The Segway Human Transporter is one of the most famous and anticipated product introductions of all time," Jeff Bezos, chief executive and founder of Amazon.com

    By who?
    I heard the same thing about that Ronco rotissory cooker, the vaccuum storage bags, and at least 5 different home gyms.

    It may be a very interesting product but lets be realistic here.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  99. Segway = less useful, more expensive scooter by jcknox · · Score: 1

    I live about 2 miles from work, which seems just a bit too far to walk, but close enough that I think driving a car is a waste of resources (short trips burn more gas and wear out the car faster).

    So I bought a scooter. It cost way less than half the price of Segway; has places for my raincoat, laptop, and briefcase; lets me sit down on the way to work; goes way faster than Segway (mine is restricted to 30 mph to let me dodge tax & insurance -- some go 50+ mph). In the last 3 months, I've put 3 gallons of gas in it.

    These things have been around for decades, but haven't caught on with everyone. Why should Segway?

  100. Re:Very funny NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm with ya man!!
    I got up at 2:30 here in California to sit in my damned backyard for about 40 minutes and all I saw was maybe 20 meteors! Only one or two were even all that impressive, the rest were quick and tiny shots that mostly were out of the corner of my eye. Stupid scientists....that's the LAST time I ever listen to them!

  101. Before investing in Segway... by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 2

    ..be aware of this website of a bunch of lawyers already making plans to soak Segway for millions.

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
  102. Don't reply saying, "That's a car" It's a joke! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's obviously a joke! Morons!

  103. A few minor issues... by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 4, Informative

    15 (really 10) miles of charge

    Doesn't seem very far to me. I think I'd be endlessly charging the thing.

    Payload: 250 lbs

    Geez, there is a significant portion of the population that weighs in excess of 250 lbs. I guess it's just not for us, er them, huh?

    NiMH batteries

    The website states they get 300-500 full charges before needing replacing. That's only about a year and a half or so before an expensive part needs replacement if you're using it daily (and for the price you'd better be).

    Insurance

    I didn't find anything involving insurance. How would a device like this be underwritten? Personal property? Auto? What?

    Pricetag

    Besides, the price tag is WAY too high (even if it were 1/10 of what it is now I would be unlikely to buy).

    1. Re:A few minor issues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Geez, there is a significant portion of the population that weighs in excess of 250 lbs. I guess it's just not for us, er them, huh?

      That's right, tubby.

      The fact that so many Americans are fat is a huge problem here, and if we now have a device like the Segway, it's good that the morbidly obese people can't use it. Maybe that'll force some of them to walk, and get some exercise.
    2. Re:A few minor issues... by Myco · · Score: 2
      15 (really 10) miles of charge
      Doesn't seem very far to me. I think I'd be endlessly charging the thing.

      It would be nice if it was a bit longer (and battery technology is always improving), but I think it seems adequate enough. By this I mean, sure you've got to plug it in, but I think you wouldn't find yourself waiting around for it to charge unless you were just careless and forgot. Plus it sounds like they're being pretty smart about power management (microcontrollers on each battery pack to allow quick charging and then micromanage for uniform usage and load balancing).

      Payload: 250 lbs
      Geez, there is a significant portion of the population that weighs in excess of 250 lbs. I guess it's just not for us, er them, huh?

      You could use the exercise, fatty.

      NiMH batteries
      The website states they get 300-500 full charges before needing replacing. That's only about a year and a half or so before an expensive part needs replacement if you're using it daily (and for the price you'd better be).

      Probably more than that -- you're unlikely to fully discharge the batteries so often. But I can see this as being an acceptable maintenance cost for something that doesn't need oil changes and the like. I wonder what the hit on your electric bill will be like, though.

      Insurance
      I didn't find anything involving insurance. How would a device like this be underwritten? Personal property? Auto? What?

      Loss, or liability? Really, it's up to the insurance companies as to what plans they'll offer. I'm sure they'll come up with something fairly soon -- hell, you can get insured against alien invasions. As for liability -- do you get insured against hitting someone with your bike?

      Pricetag
      Besides, the price tag is WAY too high (even if it were 1/10 of what it is now I would be unlikely to buy).

      1/10? Sounds like you just, uh, don't want one. Look at, say RealDolls. They sell for around the same price, but most of us wouldn't buy one at 1/10th the price. That doesn't mean they wouldn't be worth that price, to someone who wanted one.

      Of course, the price is too high right now. Would you expect any different? There are so many valid reasons for this:

      • Hype, hype, and more hype. So much free advertising has been generated for this product, they'd be fools not to capitalize on it.
      • Scarcity. They're still just beginning to ramp up production, which means there's less Segways to go around. Keeping the price high while supply is low is a good way to avoid running out of stock completely (a good sign that you've screwed something up).
      • The Segway has been rushed to market. And with good reason -- every day you can't buy a Segway, the public's memory of the aforementioned hype fades, and the product's credibility lessens. So, less emphasis will have been placed on making the things cheap as opposed to getting them out the door.
      • These things take time. New technology is always expensive, partly due to the whiz-bang factor and partly due to the fact that manufacturing processes take a while to refine and streamline.
      These things are going to get cheaper. Significantly so. Kamen is too idealistic to let Segways just be a toy for the rich.
    3. Re:A few minor issues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, there is a significant portion of the population that weighs in excess of 250 lbs. I guess it's just not for us, er them, huh?

      That's right. And neither are seats on the airplane, in the movie theatre, small sports cars, etc.

    4. Re:A few minor issues... by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 2

      It would be nice if it was a bit longer (and battery technology is always improving), but I think it seems adequate enough. By this I mean, sure you've got to plug it in, but I think you wouldn't find yourself waiting around for it to charge unless you were just careless and forgot. Plus it sounds like they're being pretty smart about power management (microcontrollers on each battery pack to allow quick charging and then micromanage for uniform usage and load balancing).

      Perhaps, depending on your use. My life would have to have a much smaller geographic circle I guess (others probably have such a circle - I just don't).

      You could use the exercise, fatty.

      Nice. Cheap shot in the place of a real insight. It might come as a suprise to you but taller folks carry more weight and despite the constantly shrinking guidelines of the FDA, there are a number of perfectly healthy people at that weight level. I would also submit that a similar weight level is common among geeks.

      Not that I'm defending my personal weight. I know I'm too heavy and am trying to do something about it. OTOH, gross overgeneralizations about the "proper" weight are bunk - even my doctor knows that.

      Probably more than that -- you're unlikely to fully discharge the batteries so often. But I can see this as being an acceptable maintenance cost for something that doesn't need oil changes and the like. I wonder what the hit on your electric bill will be like, though.

      I don't buy it. My laptop batteries sucked so much after a year of use that they are about worthless now.

      Loss, or liability? Really, it's up to the insurance companies as to what plans they'll offer. I'm sure they'll come up with something fairly soon -- hell, you can get insured against alien invasions. As for liability -- do you get insured against hitting someone with your bike?

      I asked merely out of curiousity. Right now it would be in legal limbo I would think.

      And as you pointed out in your remark above, I must not ever ride a bike. ;)

      1/10? Sounds like you just, uh, don't want one. Look at, say RealDolls. They sell for around the same price, but most of us wouldn't buy one at 1/10th the price. That doesn't mean they wouldn't be worth that price, to someone who wanted one.

      If it were cheap enough I might. But $495 is a lot for a bike (for an infrequent rider like myself) not to mention something as generally non-useful as this thing.

      Of course, the price is too high right now. Would you expect any different? There are so many valid reasons for this:

      All good points but if the price isn't lowered I can't imagine this thing taking off. The hype wore off a long time ago (by my personal estimation - IMHO) and I think that price tag will scare off everyone but the most avid (read wealthy fanatical) customers.

      These things are going to get cheaper. Significantly so. Kamen is too idealistic to let Segways just be a toy for the rich.

      Agreed. But I wonder how much cheaper it will need to get before any real public interest would allow mass production. If it doesn't break that threshold then it won't go anywhere.

      These are just my opinions - your milage may vary!

  104. Likely sad irony by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

    With all the lambasting this thing is taking here on Slashdot, it will likely turn into a huge, and damned annoying, market success somehow.

    Actually, if this thing were rigged up with some proximity and motion sensors, it could potentially be a useful assistive device for the completely blind and visually impaired, like yours truly. Then again, maybe nothing can beat the intuition and training of a guide dog. We shall see.

    I guess my point is that someone, somewhere, will find a great use for this thing even beyond its original intentions.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  105. How Segway was sold to the states by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Lobbyists downpedaled safety concerns about their product, positioning the Segway as "magic sneakers," says this article (March 2002) in the Concord (NH) Monitor. "It is a product that belongs on the sidewalk," Segway Vice President for Marketing Gary Bridge said. "We can stop as fast as you can in your sneakers. You can't do that on a bicycle."

    In case of collision, the Segway "backs up gently when it bumps an object and has low pressure tires that soften the force on anything it rides over."

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
    1. Re:How Segway was sold to the states by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      In case of collision, the Segway "backs up gently when it bumps an object"

      But it doesn't hit you gently now does it?

      "...and has low pressure tires that soften the force on anything it rides over."

      Heh. Soft tires or not, it's still the equivalent of having your foot stepped on by a 250 pound man. It's gonna hurt whether he's wearing soft-soled sneakers or combat boots. Don't you just hate marketroids? If he was selling highpowered air rifles for toddlers and someone asked "what if a kid shoots me in the head", the equivalent answer would be "we make the air guns silent, so when a kid accidentally kills you, you'll never have to worry about hearing it coming." Gee, thanks.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  106. Re:Eh? What C5? by beebware · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yep, there is another C5. Specifically, Sir Clive Sinclair's (he of the ZX Spectrum 1980's computer fame) failed electric vechicle. The Segway and the Sinclair C5 have been compared to each other quite a bit here in Britain....

  107. Segway aftermarket mods by psyconaut · · Score: 3, Funny

    (1) Second parallel battery pack -- "turbo edition"
    (2) Holder for a plastic flower -- "nostalgia edition"
    (3) Lowered suspension and purple neon lighting underneath -- "urban edition"
    (4) Pedals instead of a battery so it becomes self powered -- "amish edition" (or alternatively, "Greepeace speical" ;-)

    -psy

  108. Re:I agree completely - not me. by RobertLRead · · Score: 1

    I have an 87 year old gradmother who can only walk on flat surfaces and serious osteoporosis. I doubt riding one of these would be safe enough for her; she, like a toddler, can fall down just standing on a concrete slab. However I'm sure there are a lot of people who are movement-impaired and I think this is a great thing for that reason. I personally hope it succeds and competes with, and also encourages, the use of bicycles.

  109. Hardly fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a "fantastic an achievement in technology". It is an interesting implimentation of a well known servo control problem. Textbooks on servo control show the "balance a stick with a wheel on the bottom" problem as an example, along with the analysis of how the servo works. What makes it a tougher control problem can be reduced to "balancing a pail of water with a wheel on the bottom", dealing with sloshing, etc. If you put some smart engineers familiar with servo control theory on the problem you get a solution, not a fantastic achievement or great "potential advances". So sorry to burst your Hype Bubble.

    Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Hardly fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's so easy to balance a stick or a bucket on a wheel then why don't I see janitors walking around with a little bucket on one wheel? Hmm? I for one think this Segway thing sounds pretty cool and I don't even try to pretend I understand all the technology behind it. :-P

    2. Re:Hardly fantastic by RussGarrett · · Score: 2

      It's a fantastic achievement in engineering, or at least it will be if it takes off. It's common technology... in aircraft, industrial equipment, and spacecraft. Expensive vehicles, to say the least. But gyro-stabilisation is hardly common around the home.

      It's not easy to get any product off the ground. To get a completely new concept, with custom parts, gyros, redundant control and so on to sell, and to become a common consumer item is the challenge. Not really the technology itself. If that happens, it will certainly have changed the world, although probably not in the ways Kamen intends.

  110. I was astonished by SharpNose · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had read about the Segway, but when I saw one demoed with my own eyes, I was profoundly astonished. I suddenly felt I was in the 21st century. When I say that, I realize that there isn't much about the Segway that couldn't have been developed years earlier (I'm not talking about possible novel improvements in energy density of batteries or the like). Say what you will (and I'm about to), but I think that *some* of the hype is deserved.

    But, after the demo, I really started to wonder about the real usability of the thing and I think I came upon a kind of Achilles' heel that I don't think the design of the Segway addresses: uneven surfaces that induce a roll. Imagine a perfectly flat sidewalk, and then imagine that on the right half of the sidewalk I lay down some humps - let's make them 1/2" high and 6" wide, and let me space their centers 12" apart. Now, on the left side of the sidewalk, let me lay down similar humps similarly, except I'll offset them relative to the other set such that they are in line with the gaps in the other set.

    Now, here I come with my Segway at four feet per second. I get to the bumps, and each wheel is forced up and down 1/2" four times a second. Aren't my Segway's handlebars going to be jerking from side to side very rapidly, displacing maybe 3"-4" or so? What's that going to be like to hold on to?

    I also wonder about "failure modes," i.e., one-person collisions and falls. Also, what happens when there's a gyro failure? I can imagine the thing falling over like a leaf rake if the pitch gyro stopped working.

    1. Re:I was astonished by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem I can think of that hasn't been explained is this:

      According to what I've read, in order to get moving, you lean forward, the thing starts to tip forward, then the wheels start rolling to keep you vertical. If that's the case, what happens if you've reached the maximum speed, and you lean forward some more? If it's got no more room to accelerate, how does it keep you vertical? I wouldn't want to be the person who tries this and ends up skidding for 20 or 30 feet on my face.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    2. Re:I was astonished by fenix+down · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that was the first problem I thought of too. I figured that the rider would deal with that on their own. It really is basically like walking. If you try and run down a hill, you'll have to be able to go fast enough to keep up with your upper body. If you notice you're going too fast, you lean back and start slowing down. The machine wouldn't have to do anything special to handle that, but it would rely on people being able to recognize what's happening. It's more or less instinctive, though. You'd have the point where the whole thing starts tipping forward, and you should have a reflex to pull yourself back, which would fix it.

      I can see somebody suing over that, though. Like stupid suburban kids thinking it's a bike and doing downhill races.

    3. Re:I was astonished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've ridden a segway, and i'm not too concerned about this, because the amount of "leaning forward" is miniscule. It would probably be more accurate to say that you slightly shift your weight forward (in order to go forward). There really isn't any "leaning" as such. If you were to shift your weight forward in the same way while standing on the ground, you'd still easily be able to remain vertical (with a little toe pressure).

  111. Kamen is a self absorbed krackpot by waldo2020 · · Score: 1

    I can't believe all this Kamen worship... He's never put out a commmercially viable high volume consumer item - including ginger! He didn't "invent" the insulin pump nor the first stair climbing wheelchair. Read the patents - he doesn't even do the critical work on the inventions - his employees do, and if you read the comments from them, he's no genius, no humanitarian and no business guru. Just another shyster that knows how to manipulate hype. We'll see how the USPS field trial works out;)

    1. Re:Kamen is a self absorbed krackpot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting line. Got links to back it up? When making claims like that, you can't really expect the reader to search them out for themselves.

  112. What's is it a segway to? by wodelltech · · Score: 1

    Why did Dean use this name. Any chance it's just a lead-in (segway) to some other invention? What else is the self-righting technology useful for?

    --
    Your monitor is staring at you.
    1. Re:What's is it a segway to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the self righting technology useful for? Easy, a giant bipedal piloted robot.

      Battlemech Wars on TV anyone? :D

  113. Not same Re:For that price.. by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

    It's not quite as simple as that though. Cycling often means having to carry multiple clothes and showering at the far end, so you need towels, soap, shampoo etc. It can easily add 15-30 minutes to a commute of a few miles. A segway needs, at most, rain gear; although its top speed is not as fast it's probably still a win.

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    1. Re:Not same Re:For that price.. by Vox+Humana · · Score: 1

      Not if you're only going 10-12 MPH. I imagine the exertion to maintain that pace would be on the order of walking. You'd probably want to wear biking shorts for longer distances, but the shower should be unnecessary.

    2. Re:Not same Re:For that price.. by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      Depends on how hilly it is.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  114. They are everywhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am living in Manchester, NH and I see these things all the time. I was down by the mills 4 seperate times while I was cramming for my CCNP exams, and small packs of them would go wizing by. They seem like fun, but the people riding them all wore dorky helmets. For that price tag, I would rather buy a old used car like a MGB to tinker around with.

  115. Motorcycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a motorcycle or scooder. Safer, Faster. Plus you are driving on the road not the sidewalk.

  116. You are correct by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    Yes, that is correct. It was kind of a recumbent scooter. It didn't really matter since you couldn't turn the front wheel very far to the left or the right.

    It also came with a little flag that stuck up so that other motorists wouldn't kill you ... quite so fast!

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  117. Not overhyped at all! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

    I would highly disagree. People who live in cramped cities appreciate the Segway since it provides an alternative to bikes and mopeds. You don't get sweaty from using it, and it is potentially safer than a moped. However, if you live in a more open area where traffic jams don't really pose a problem, sure it is makes less sense.

    Before you pass judgement, look at how much time people spend in traffic jams, and what the real average speed is when you drive in downtown areas.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

    1. Re:Not overhyped at all! by Gaurang · · Score: 1

      I just read this on the segway site:

      The Segway HT intuitively balances the way humans do--moving forward and backward, responding to changes in your body's position. There is no accelerator and no brakes. Lean forward and you move forward. Straighten up and you stop. Lean back, and you move back. To turn, rotate the steering grip under your wrist in either direction.

      And that was it.

      I am now just waiting for the money I can afford for it and its price tag to come closer, and soon I will find myself moving around my house on this!!!

      I guess if the price goes down, it will be a cool thing for students who live near school campuses.

      --
      I have found a solution to Riemann's Hypothesis, but have run out of spac
  118. A better use for my 5 grand by Myco · · Score: 2

    At last there's a better way to blow 5 grand than a RealDoll. Well, I don't know if it's more useful but at least you can let your mother use your Segway.

  119. Walking replacement? by michaelggreer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do we really need a replacement for walking? It seems to me that bicycles fit the bill quite nicely, with public transport coming up right behind. I have to admit, I live in NYC and have never felt that I walk too much. What we need is a replacement for cars. Make this thing faster and lower to the ground and then... wait, that's a motorcycle. Just seems like a solution without a problem. The inventor is an arrogant monster too. Trying to change the laws in cities so the fools with these things can endanger our lives on the sidewalks.

    1. Re:Walking replacement? by Scyber · · Score: 1

      This is designed as a replacement for cars in the city. Basically it extends the range that you can comfortably travel without using cars, mass transit, or cabs. While you would probably normally take your car, a cab or the subway to travel a long distance in NYC, you can now use the Segway. It is still overpriced, but an interesting invention nontheless.

    2. Re:Walking replacement? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      While you would probably normally take your car, a cab or the subway to travel a long distance in NYC, you can now use the Segway

      But that's the real problem, isn't it? Cities have already adapted systems to move people the distances the Segway is supposed to "open up". There is no "unreachable" distance in, say, Manhattan that's too far to walk but too short to hop the subway. Steve Jobs made a very fools-prophet comment when he saw the Segway: "Cities will be built around [the Segway] in the future". The Segway will fail because existing cities will have to be redesigned to truly take advantage of the Segway, and that just ain't gonna happen.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Walking replacement? by Anitra · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd like a replacement for cars. Preferably one that's less expensive. I can't afford to move to a big city because I'm finishing school.

      I need to get a job so I can support myself. But I can't get anywhere without a car, so I can't get a job without a car, but I need money to afford a car.. ARGH!!

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
  120. Worthless toy by Capt_Troy · · Score: 2

    I know they are trying to sell this thing to the post office and security forces.

    First of all, if you are lucky enough to have a job that let's you keep in shape while doing it, why the hell would you want to throw away your fitness to ride around on a gay little scooter. I'm glad this thing costs an arm and a leg, the higher price will keep people from making fun of fat americans...

    To me, this is like something that would only be useful if you lost the power to convery youself to a destination.

  121. I saw several yesterday on the street in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I work in midtown Manhattan, and yesterday at my lunch hour, I saw about 4 people riding Segways along the sidewalk down 7th Avenue. I'm guessing it was a PR thing, to build buzz. Note that I saw them at 7th Ave. and 56th Street... which is about 10 blocks north of Times Square. And that's where they seemed to be heading.

    I gotta say: they were damn cool... and at least the way these folks were riding them, they didn't look particularly dangerous to pedestrians. Of course NYC has very wide sidewalks.

  122. iBot. by Night0wl · · Score: 2

    "one of the most famous and anticipated products..of all time"

    Ok, so maybe I'm being a little rash, No it's not. But that's only because I have no interest on something to stand on.

    I am how ever interested in Kamen's iBot, the Standing, all dancing, crap of the world. Wait wrong thread. Any way, from my PPV (Personal Point of View) the iBot is a much neater geek toy then the Segway. Sure, it's neat in it's balancing abilities, but have you ever heard of this indangered species called humans? They have this wonderful sense of balance, and it's built in. Grab a skate board, hop on a scooter, if you're going for distance try a bike.

    Now, back to the geekiness that is more the iBot then IT. This chair, can balance on two wheels. Some humans have trouble with that--and consiquently would probably wind up going in circles on the IT. That's the product I'd like to see.

    --

    Yes, this was all of course biased in that I can't walk and require a wheelchair. Don't worry, I'm comfortable with my disability and don't need to attack any one. I don't know any other life then being disabled, the only thing I attack is human stupidity.

    --
    Computational Madness in a round package.
  123. Seg-jacking! by nobbist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As cool as these segways may be the price is astronomical but understandable when we consider the engineer behind it. This does bring up the issue of people stealing Segways or worse yet "jacking" them as they say in the hood. I bet that within the 1st 6 months someone will have this happend to them and get their assed kicked in the process. Anyone? You'd think that with all his whiz-bangery Mr Kamen would conceive of an out of this world security technology to mate with this =). nobbist

  124. Segway is dying. by grub · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It is official; Netcraft now confirms: Segway is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Segway community when IDC confirmed that Segway market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent. Coming close on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Segway has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Segway is collapsing in complete disarray.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Segway's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Segway faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Segway because Segway is dying. Things are looking very bad for Segway. As many of us are already aware, Segway continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    All major surveys show that Segway has steadily declined in market share. Segway is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Segway is to survive at all it will be among dilettante dabblers. Segway continues to decay. Nothing short of a cockeyed miracle could save Segway from its fate at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Segway is dead.


    Fact: Segway is dying

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  125. get a bicycle, scooter, or motorcycle by g4dget · · Score: 2

    For a fraction of the price, you can get a bicycle and keep in shape. If you need something that stowes away more easily than a bike, get a folding bike--smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the Segway. Or, you can get a scooter. And for $5000, you can already get a pretty nifty motorcycle. All of those will get you to your destination faster.

  126. Segway sux@ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Segway was invented/designed in Manchester, NH, which I find this odd since the Segway is designed for places where one can't bike or drive in (very crowded streets which is not Manchester). I can't imagine someone riding the f**king thing in Manchester except for the fat tools at DEKA.

    The last thing us fat, lazy Americans need is a over priced gadget because we can't walk half mile.

  127. 12mph missile. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    "The Segway Human Transporter is one of the most famous and anticipated product introductions of all time

    No, that's called "hype". And it's amazing the number of state legistlators have already signed off on making a 12mph scooter sidewalk legal so quickly despite major safty concerns.

    Sorry, but Bezoes little project reeks of desperation and cut corners.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  128. Hint of an alarming trend by cnmill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw some of these at EPCOT in September, 02. I also noticed that the stroller rental stands were clogged with people renting those battery-powered carts (moto-thrones) that are occasionally seen in grocery stores for, I assumed, handicapped folks.

    The alarming thing was that based on overheard conversations, a surprising amount of the people who were getting these appeared not to be handicapped, just too lazy to walk all over the disney parks.

    I am in favor of coexisting with technology as much as the next guy, but I have to question things when it makes our (US) overfat and lazy culture more overfat and lazy.

    --
    How sleepless is the egg, knowing that which throws the stone forsees the bone.
    1. Re:Hint of an alarming trend by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      I've seen this plenty of times at the local low-cost (read: white trash) grocery stores. Seriously fat people. As someone who lost 100 lbs without going hungry (no I won't tell you, I don't want to turn this into an ad I won't even make any money off of) and without exercising or taking drugs (well more than usual) there is no reason for anyone to be fat. Period. If you want to, that's okay I guess, as long as you get the fuck out of my way in the meat section. But it is way sad to see someone who is so fat that they are disabled. Go on a diet, get some exercise, stop pounding food with a whole crapload of empty carbs and fat in the same bite, dumbfuck. Drop that poundage.

      Brought to you by the "it's my karma, smoke it" foundation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  129. The reason my mom is looking at getting one. by Minupla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    She's 65, lives close to a downtown core, and her eyesight is getting bad enough that driving a car is becoming problematic, or will in the next couple of years. Segway would be a good solution for her.

    Try to look outside yourself when you judge the worth of a product.

    --
    On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    1. Re:The reason my mom is looking at getting one. by DavidYaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No offense to you or your mom, but wouldn't getting glasses be easier and significantly cheaper?

    2. Re:The reason my mom is looking at getting one. by Minupla · · Score: 2

      Ya, well there is a point where glasses don't cut it, and since it's the presure inside her eyeball that is giving her problems, and not a question of focal points (she's losing her perephial vision, which is key when you're moving a large heavy object down the road at 60 mph, trying to avoid people doing silly things.)

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
  130. Re: Payload by distributed.karma · · Score: 2
    > Geez, there is a significant portion of the population that weighs in excess of 250 lbs. I guess it's just not for us, er them, huh?

    And when people start using Segway instead of walking or cycling, the population capable of using them will diminish exponentially.

    --

    --
    If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  131. Post is wrong? by nochops · · Score: 1

    I may be mistaken, but hasen't Mr. Kamen said in several interviews that Segway is absolutely *not* IT?

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
  132. Not "IT" by blunte · · Score: 1

    There was a recent article (no I don't have link, and I don't feel like finding it... karma be damed) where the author reportedly asked the Segway creator a question, and was told (paraphrased)

    Segway is not "IT".

    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
  133. Another technology that was bah humbugged.... by Minupla · · Score: 2

    I recall when I got my first modem. The concensus was that it was "like having the first telephone, who do you call?"

    Lesson: never think you can see the whole picture from a piece of isolated technology. Modems begot the internet, broadband, and who knows what next?

    Who knows what the Segway will beget 30 yrs in the future, not I. Maybe it will not catch on and maybe it will become as ubiquitious as the internet is now. Who knows? Certianly not I.

    It's always safer to write off any new technology cynically, because odds are that a given technological advance won't catch on. On the other hand, noone ever gained anything writing off a technology before they see what comes of it.

    Try to open your minds a bit folks!

    Minupla

    --
    On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
  134. What the heck? by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

    It doesn't have a parking brake? Seriously. That seems like a very logical thing to have. Forget voice recognition or anything else. I want to be certain each time I park this thing that it stays put. I wonder why they wouldn't have something like this in it? Too obvious?

    Maybe the non-prototype consumer version does have it, who knows.

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  135. All you ppl.. by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

    complaining about trains ...
    Take a look at these and shut the hell up.
    image 1
    image2
    In case you haven't guessed already , These are from my hometown bombay. So there...

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    1. Re:All you ppl.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good for you. Noone cares.

    2. Re:All you ppl.. by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      gah .. you ppl gotta quit screwing so much

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  136. Does it work in snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love one for Christmas but there is a foot of snow that just fell. I wonder if I could attach some skis or at least snow tires with chains.

  137. I've ridden one by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

    I got a chance to ride one at a FIRST competition (FIRST is the robotics competition run by Dean Kamen) for a brief period, I'd like to say that 99% of you are completely wrong. The segway is amazingly easy to drive. It takes advantage of your body's natural balancing ability. I didn't get to take it up to full speed, but it sure seemed fast enough to me. The "ignition" is tied to an encrypted key making it pretty hard to steal. they may not revolutionize the world, but they are the perfect thing for anyone that needs to get around faster then walking, but needs more mobility then a car.

    1. Re:I've ridden one by Tattva · · Score: 2
      I didn't get to take it up to full speed, but it sure seemed fast enough to me

      It seems fast because it moves at the speed of laughable.

      --
      personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
  138. Destined to Fail by fonnix · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's destined to fail because you have to stand.

    --
    "I am a student. Please do not fold, spindle, or mutilate me." -Slogan of the Free Speech Movement, 1964.
  139. I saw a guy on one in Chicago a few days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was cruising on the sidewalk.. wearing a business suit and a bicycle helmet. He wasn't going too fast.. barely faster than the average pace in which a person walks, but I was curious how he would react to a group of people walking in his direction. He ended up plowing through them directly in the middle of their group. Also when he went to cross the street, he seemed to have a bit of difficulty getting up the handicapped-accessible lip for the getting on the sidewalk. Ironically a few weeks ago I saw a man in a wheelchair trying to get up the exact same slope and having a hell of a time so maybe it's a bit of a beast for wheels. Anywho I wanted to give my $0.02.

  140. Legs (As We Know It) Doomed? by lostboy2 · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can't wait for the day when an ASIMO steals a segway and runs over someone's AIBO

    The ASIMO's lawyer was quoted as saying "1001001110001010".
    :p
  141. Slashdotters hate Vettes? (was Re:C5) by smithmc · · Score: 1

    A couple guys play on the obvious (to anyone with a life) pun between the Sinclair C5 and the 5-th generation Corvette (aka C5), and they get modded down to 0. What gives?

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  142. Jesus H Friggin Cow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why all the negativity?! Is this not the crowd that starts drooling over a new case mod, or a Escher replica made of Lego blocks?!?!

    Clearly, few of you have seen this thing in real life. The one poster that claimed to said the rider, after dismounting, watched the thing to make sure it would not roll away. What a load of crap.

    I did manage to see one of these up close a few weeks ago. The rider moved around for more than an hour, completely at ease, hands free most of the time, with astonishing agility, speed, balance, and coordination. He easily went from standstill to running speed (fast running) in about 15 feet, then abruptly stopped about 2 feet from a wall. This was in an enclosed room (about 25 feed wide), and done hands free. He also blended in to a crowd with what seemed like no problem at all -- the thing was hardly noticeable, actually.

    No, I have nothing to do with Mr. Kamen or his companies (although I think his work with the FIRST competition makes him more deserving of my respect than any of you bums). Give it a friggin rest -- just because the guy is obviuosly smarter than any of you (or me) (and more intelligent, creative, motivated, and rich) doesn't mean we need to hold some kind of crazy grudge.

    Yes, the thing got a lot of attention in the press. And it should have, too. It is an impressive bit of engineering, manufacturing, design. Couple that with a compelling story about what it can be used for, how it is better than a car in terms of social interaction, size, space, polution, danger, etc, and put that on the paper rather than yet another story about the latest stupid gadget ("Carry your 'wrist PDA' with you all the time" shouts USAToday).

    </rant>

  143. You mean... "diff�rence" perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Vive la differance and all that, but Segway will be as popular as American tourists in Paris.

    Okay, I think you just lost your credibility as a Paris expert.
  144. Yeah...medical products... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    He's obviously hoping to release this terror on the urban landscape, and make his profit selling new-fangled wheelchairs to the people injured because of the 'SegWay' :)

    That, or get rich with an at-home stomach stapling kit, since nobody WALKS anymore.

    --
    Blar.
  145. Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    1. The weight of the unit has to come down. The current 65 pound weight is a bit much to carry up and down staircases.

    It does stairs. RTFA.
    2. The unit should be collapsible, so you it makes it much easier to carry on and off means of public transport (trains, trolleys, buses and ferries).

    Again, it has follow mode.
    3. The cost has to be much lower than now.

    Duh, it will be. How much were the first cell phones/DVD players/computers, etc.?
  146. More interested in new Stirling Engine by powerbarr · · Score: 1

    There was an episode of Sixty Minutes II recently where they had Kamen showing a prototype Stirling engine that could also be used to purify water in remote rural villages while providing power to charge cell phones, Segways, etc.

    The show didn't say when the engine would be available for sale. But I see it as a much greater achievement than the Segway and something that will change the world more than the scooter.

  147. Don't buy it... by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    An experience of mine comes to mind when thinking of the effects of an ill-handled Segue-- The rollar rink. Yes, that place you haven't visited in ages. The experience? Being at the bottom of a multi-skater pile up. It hurt.

    The point? Bodies absorb impact. hardened materials don't. It wasn't nessisarily the people falling on top of me that hurt, but the impact of their 5lb (or so) skates. Now don't get me wrong, I don't doubt the Seque can stop on a dime. It's a cool piece of technology. BUT, their operators are human. And I suspect Segues will be like communism-- Both tend to go wrong when humans are involved. People are idiots. On bikes. On powered motorscooters. In cars. And i will be waiting, yes, waiting, for the first idiot on a plastic/aluminum hardened Segue to maul a pedesterian on a sidewalk because he wasn't paying attention. Not only does he stand a good chance of being sued, but so does the state for enacting this idiotic mix of soft, mostly slow pedesterians who have to seriously try to break 5mph and the hard and heavy (skooter + body weight!) segue that effortlessly obtains it's top speed. Mark my words, that day will come and lots of people will find themselves either ass deep in lawsuits or out of court settlments.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  148. Complain much? by craenor · · Score: 1

    For a forum dedicated to recognizing advances in technology, there certainly are a lot of closed minded people here.

    Would it be so hard to give an idea a chance? You know, people said this same crap about the car and the airplane...

  149. A minor detail... by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And I really mean no offense to your Mom when i say this...

    Her eyesight is bad enough driving a car? How about her reaction time? Attention span? One, if not all of these might not bode well for her motorized segue future...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  150. In the snow. by BigumD · · Score: 2

    I have actually got to try one of these in the snow monday ( I also live in ManchVegas ). They handle surprisingly well, although I did lose control going down Central St on a patch of ice. The machine just kinda "slipped", for lack of better term, forward. But it didn't feel like I was going to lose control at all. Very impressive that it only happened once in about a 3 mile jaunt as well.

    --
    --The space between my ears was intentionally left blank--
  151. A better U$S239 alternative... by maitas · · Score: 1

    Well, at least for U$S239 you can get this
    http://www.electric-scooters-electric-scooters.c om /program/fixedPriceMod.cfm?do=detail&productID=66& categoryID=8
    and it even come with a seat!!

  152. Weight limitation by Ripplet · · Score: 1

    >Carrying capacity: 250-pound user

    Well, I guess that cuts out at least half the American population!

    --

    Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal

    1. Re:Weight limitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is only for the personal model, which most people will have. The industrial model will be able to carry almost twice as much.

  153. You know you live in a sad, sad world when... by TitusC3v5 · · Score: 1

    people are too lazy to walk. On a more serious note however, I would never, ever own one of these things, even if they were to become something of a fad. Why? Because of the simple fact that God gave me two legs to move around. I could see certain applications where a Segway might be handy, but on the hold it is just as the article decription states - an overhyped, overprice toy.

    --
    And the masses cried out, "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0!"
  154. Most overpriced toy ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you're confused. This is the most overprice toy ever: http://www.realdoll.com

  155. Showers, not laziness by TamMan2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree with you about the sweaty thing being a nice aspect, but what I whish we would do is, instead of making ways for us to get around without sweating, why don't we make it more convenient to clean up after getting sweaty? I live 12 miles from where I work, in Connecticut, so I know about traffic, and it is this traffic that makes me wish I could ride my bike to work, but being the profuse sweater that I am, I could not got to work once I got to work (did that make sense?) There is a company health club (really big company...) but it is 2.5 miles from my desk. If one of the bathrooms in my building (or even anywhere near my building) had a shower, I would ride my bike to work whenever there is no snow on the ground... but instead I sit in traffic getting pissed off, just like everyone else, and then I spend an hour exercising after I get home. Doesn't make much sense, does it?

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    1. Re:Showers, not laziness by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

      I will probably recommend my employer buy one or two of those. It will be a nice way to get to meetings relatively nearby, rather than dealing with (paying for and waiting for) a taxi.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    2. Re:Showers, not laziness by nzhavok · · Score: 2

      I know where youer coming from!! But luckily my previous job (compaq) Had lots of showers in the buildings so I was biking for the whole year and it was great. Now I'm stuck without showers again so I'm back to public transport. I'm sure that having people bike/run to work makes them healthier, why can't companies see that it's advantagous to supply showers? Cheap bastards.

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    3. Re:Showers, not laziness by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      I agree with you about the sweaty thing being a nice aspect, but what I whish we would do is, instead of making ways for us to get around without sweating, why don't we make it more convenient to clean up after getting sweaty?

      The problem is sociological. Taking a shower necessitates all kinds of other shit, at least in the case of the females of the species; makeup and frequently elaborate dress. I'm talking about offices here, hostile microsocieties in which such things matter. Then again, anything not an office is actually less likely to include showers.

      So you have to change the behavior from "get all gussied up for work" to "make yourself clean and inoffensive". This is I admit less of a problem for men, but as we're part of the problem (in that we are part of maintaining cultural expectations) it applies to all of us.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  156. Aggressive Sedgewaying by ayjay29 · · Score: 2

    We've had "Aggressive Inlines", now all the rich kids are gonna start the next craze, 'Aggressive Sedgewaying'.

    Anyone with $5000 can dye there hair green and look a tit trying to do tripple 360 bone-outs down at the local ramp.

    Plenty of merchandizing oportunity here:

    Tony Dawk Pro Sedgeway for the X-Box anyone?

    I bet you can even nick one in the next GTA.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  157. Just the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I look at the Segway as a prototype. As the technology is tested and refined, it could be used in other forms of vehicles that could be beneficial. The future will tell.

  158. What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody mod the parent as flamebait. Mainly because he's baiting flamers with his penis-talk.

    Weirdo.

  159. Anyone else notice the weight limit? by gregwbrooks · · Score: 2
    With a 250 lb. carrying capacity, I'd think a pretty hefty (no pun intended) percentage of slashdot readers can give up their Segway dreams right now.

    Well, that or start eating celery.

    --


    "It was a summer's tale: Just a boy, his Linux, and a head full of dreams..."
  160. What kind of moon-man language are you speaking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    assumption is the mother of all F@#$-ups

    Fat Hash Dollar-ups? I don't get it...

  161. Yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're able to use all of their bodies; they're not broken.

  162. Segway Nay-Sayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously there are plenty of NIMRODS reading / replying to /. these days.

    If you have actually used one of the Segways then you are qualified to judge it. (I have an until you have you really dont get a feel for how this will change things.)

    For starters the Seway will carry much more cargo then a human can or a mountain bike can.

    It is always refreshing to see such technically astute people bash a marvel of modern technology. Sounds like to me there are lots of folks that a) have never been on one, b) cant afford one (WAH WAH WAH), and c) dont really understand how this will change transport in large factories, cities, and large campuses.

    Anyways always good too see that most people are still NIMRODS!

    1. Re:Segway Nay-Sayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks Dean Kamen... or is this Jeff (Bezos)?

    2. Re:Segway Nay-Sayers by adb · · Score: 2

      250 pounds? My bike can carry me, a loaded backpack, and a few grocery bags (a total in excess of that weight) at twice the speed of a Segway, and I have no reason to believe it could handle another hundred pounds if it had to. Besides, I have no expectation that Segways will be allowed on the train any more than bikes are, so what does it get me? Less exercise, I guess, and less money, definitely. If I want to spend $5000 on something to move cargo, I'll buy a 3/4 ton truck.

    3. Re:Segway Nay-Sayers by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

      Hey Steve!! How about ditching that one-button mouse.

  163. It's the ultimate bachelor mobile... by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

    for those guys too lazy to walk and too single to need to be able to transport more then themselves.

    If you have anything other then an infant ( and a baby backpack) it's useless to carry around your family with. I mean even if they make a version for 5 year olds, you won't be ableto cruise along with it because the children (won't someone please think of them ) won't be able to go as fast.

  164. If it was actually selling.... by Animats · · Score: 2
    If they actually were shipping the thing, by which I mean you place an order and it shows up promptly, it would be more interesting. The "delivery contest" thing means they don't have their act together on manufacturing.

    The price point is still too high. This thing should be manufacturable in volume for around $1000. Basically, there's two good wheel drives, an electronics board, a battery, and a case. The wheel drives are the only hard to make item.

    As a tool for delivery people, this has potential. Maybe.

  165. No Pollution? by LunchLady · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Hmmm...does it have a Mr. Fusion?

    Seems to me you would have to charge the fucker everyday...where does that electricity come from? Oh that's right - the power plant isn't in your backyard - fuckstick.

    I can't wait for the insurance companies to make this thing an insurance nightmare.

  166. Re: Segway Type R by WD · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ask and Ye shall receive

  167. I speak for all Americans when I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, your ugly children, your slut wife, and the horse you rode in on.

    Someone who makes broad statements about the intelligence of the entire population of a country probably fits the statement more themselves.

  168. Couple of points... by andy_aardema · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "It's also the most overhyped and overpriced toy ever..."

    This coming from the owner of an Aibo.

    C'mon Rob, you'd pay $1400 for a stupid plastic dog, but you think a transporter has no use or function? Thanks for your input, but I think I'll trust Jeff Bezos over you. He does know a thing or two about selling things...

    Next, on the price, yes it's high, but we all know it will come down with greater mass production.

    Yes, I have a (very) nice bike that cost less than half this, but bikes have their limitations. A lot of Americans seem to be forgetting that bicycles are not legal on most if not all sidewalks (for good reason). That leaves the street, which for many, is not a safe alternative. In my town, riding to work is a dangerous exercise. I do it occasionally in the warmer months but not without plenty of honks and screams (e.g. "Get the f*ck out of the road") from passing cars. (Even though bikes are legally allowed the far lane of traffic according to my state's laws)

    The segway, on the other hand, IS probably safe for sidewalks, since it maneuver like a human and not like a bike, scooter, etc. This isn't about exercise folks. You CANT ride a bicycle in a busy pedestrian path without running over feet and hitting people. Ditto for rollerblades. Dean and friends probably would have made a human-powered one if they could have, but that wasn't really a design point.

    It pains me to see everyone scoff at it without knowing anything about it or actually having seen/ridden it. There are probably more engineering man-hours into this thing than in the average human lifespan, and by some of the best engineers in the country. Reading the spec sheet is like reading about the space shuttle. C'mon, at worst case, this is the ultimate geek toy, and at best, it might be useful to a lot of people in a lot of places in the world.

    $5000 of course is way too high, but I might pay $500. Maybe by then it'll be stirling powered as well. In the mean time, I'll wait to criticize until I have actual facts. Oh yeah, I guess this is slashdot. Nevermind then...

  169. The sure fire way to get Slashdot excited.... by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

    ... about this thing is to have it include a radio that supports OGG.

    --
    Forget the whales - save the babies.
  170. What's a stirling engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not so smart.

    1. Re:What's a stirling engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  171. These are actually kinda cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the chance to see Dean Kamen riding one of these at graduation in May. They look really cool and he had no problem navigating the crowded gym on it. He didn't hit anyone. And he said look what I can do and I didn't even graduate college.

    1. Re:These are actually kinda cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you go to WPI in Worcester, MA?

    2. Re:These are actually kinda cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was actually planning on going to WPI but switched at the last minute. I spent a lot of time up there though. I know a bunch of people that graduated this past year including my sister. Another friend works for Dean Kamen and I am super jealous...she has been in his house and everything. I so need a job like that.

  172. I already own a human transporter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    It's called a bicycle. It's proven technology, costs about one tenth of a Segway, is much more comfortable (you don't stand on it, you sit), doesn't need to be charged, can be locked outside, etc., etc...

  173. Re:Slashdotters hate Vettes? (was Re:C5) by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    No, he started at 0. Bad karma and all. Like the +1 Bonus.

    Incidentally, I lost all my respect for Corvettes after I saw one with a type-R sticker. I'm sticking to lusting after classic Mustangs. At least you can trust them not to cruise around with an automatic transmission trying to spin their tires.

  174. Re:I agree completely - not me. by fenix+down · · Score: 1

    The guy did make wheelchairs before this thing. That kind of thing might have been what he was thinking about when he first came up with it.

  175. People have Segways? by lanky_boy_2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    and here I am using my legs like a sucker!

    --
    What's not to be worried about? Everything!
  176. Re:For that price.. 100lb deliveries? by zipwow · · Score: 2

    I'm missing something... How is it more efficient to use a bike trailer and your own power to tote around 100lbs of gear than to use the segway?

    Is there some weight limit on the segway I'm not aware of, or are you unaware of the trailer option for the segway?

    I live in Seattle, and the bike-couriers here are SOLID from runs in and around the hilly downtown. I'm in reasonable shape, but I couldn't haul anything up six blocks of hills.

    -Zipwow

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
  177. Observations (no conclusions) of Segway in Atlanta by netsphinx · · Score: 1

    The APD are using these things. They look more intimidating on them than does a bicycle cop (though still not as impressive as the mounted police, which we no longer have here) or a cop on foot. It raises them over the heads of most pedestrians, which is probably useful. It also allows them to carry large amounts of gear more comfortably than on their belts, into smaller spaces than with a car. You could probably get a bicycle into most of those spaces, with a full kit in your panniers and wide tires for rough surfaces, but -really- tight corners, less than the turning radius of the bike, would be trouble. Our downtown isn't huge, nor particularly rundown, but we have (junior) skyscrapers within a few blocks of condemned, weedy areas with cracked-up pavement. One cop's beat could include both types of terrain. As for the chase--a good cyclist could outpace a segway and escape, but he or she could equally well outpace a cop on foot. I imagine the police coordinate these things by radio. Weather: Atlanta doesn't have to cope with snow more than two or three times a year; even my 'touring' bike tires can cope with our usual cover. We get whopping great ice storms, sometimes, which put half-an-inch of black ice on the road and scare even northern drivers into getting off the streets. I don't think the segway could cope with that. I'm not sure what could. It looked to me as though one could be happier in the rain on this gadget than on a bike--less spray-up from the road when you travel, body more vertical when standing still. That's just a guess, though.

  178. re: bicycle by Anitra · · Score: 1

    ... is near useless in hilly areas, cannot be operated in business clothing, is disregarded by motorists but should not be used on sidewalks, cannot be operated comfortably for more than a mile or two, etc.

    --

    Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
  179. Re:For that price.. 100lb deliveries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a segway wont make it up one hill.

    they are inefficient litle turd mobiles. very little power, no range.. he said 8 hours .. the seg cant do anything NEAR that. it's very limited range and time makes it a toy.

  180. Older people rarely get it by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

    Sadly, the elderly don't get it. The Segway could be a liberator for a lot of them. The relative slowness would allow them to continue moving about independently after their reactions and vision has detoriated so far that they have their license revoked. I for one would much prefer to have grandpa on the sidewalk on a Segway going 9mph, rather than in his car putting everyone at a much greater risk.

    Hopefully, the availability of the Segway might lead to medical doctors being less reluctant to revoke the driver's license from elderly people they have known most of their adult lives. They can now give them a good alternative that will suffice for most uses (visiting their family, going to the grocery store, visiting their friends). If you need to go far, you can drive a lot of taxi for the price of having a car.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  181. I have waited two years for this! by sed_awk2 · · Score: 1

    I have heard a lot of people speak of what a disappointment this product is. For me, it is a savior. I've been waiting two years for this product to come to market. Why, my wife has a serious heart condition and cannot walk long distances. Going to the mall, an event that most people don't think anything of wipes her out for a minimum of one day. Our usual trip is going to one side, and then driving to the other side. Anything that is left in between is often left out. Many people think that people with disabilities have visible issues like a gimpy leg, etc. I've had people threaten to beat me up because we used a handicap-parking place even though we have a legitimate disability tag. Most people don't even stop to think, "Gee, this person may have had their chest pried open at 14 and currently has damaged valves, no pericardium, or a slow leek of blood to the liver." I thank the people that have developed this product. Maybe, I'll be able to take my wife to the Park, or Quincy Market without it being a near trip to the hospital afterwards. These people have just liberated my wife and opened a whole new world onto her. Thank you

  182. Re:Stirling Engine & Segway by fnurb · · Score: 2, Informative

    On the November 13 edition of 60 minutes, Kamen showed a working stirling engine, and talked about how the three initial uses Deka was focusing on were water purification and cheap power source for third world countries, and an engine for the Segway.

    --


    Flout 'em and scout 'em,
    and scout 'em and flout 'em;
    Thought is free. - Shakespeare [The Tempest]
  183. Re:Don't reply saying, "That's a car" It's a joke! by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    What's a joke? That's a car? Is that funny? Why am I not laughing? Why can't I reply? Who's in charge here?

  184. *nods head* by BiOFH · · Score: 2

    Yeah, until they start making [as a co-worker calls it] "Admin Sized" versions.

    Maybe they'll be like Jeep and have a special edition kinda like the Eddie Bauer Cherokee; but it would be the R.M. Stallman Edition Segway.

    "Supports up to 400 lbs. Comes complete with cup holder and Palm cradle."

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  185. Gosh, so many anonymous cowards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so many of them just happen to have first-hand info about the Segway. Or--are these all different anonymous coward posts just one or two people posting the same "Buy Segway" hype again and again and again?

  186. IDNTTWMWYTIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will take your balance queues

    s/queues/cues/g

  187. Re: Segway by TamMan2000 · · Score: 2

    ...is disregarded by motorists but should not be used on sidewalks...

    I feel really sorry for the first guy who runs into me ridding one of these things because he was riding it on the sidewalk at 10+MPH and stopped paying attention because he saw some hottie. I will beat the s#!7 out of him!

    On the plus side, your comment made me realize possible positive side effects of this toys popularity... Maybe they will Segway lanes and the cyclists can use them...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  188. This was sed_awk2's first post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Anybody want to guess if this brand-new /. account was just opened exactly for the purpose of boosting Segway?

    Think about it. There is an extremely narrow range of "handicap" that leaves you still able to stand upright, balance, drag a 95 lb scooter around, etc. I don't think anyone would object if this tiny number of people used Segways.

    1. Re:This was sed_awk2's first post. by sed_awk2 · · Score: 1

      No, this is not a new account opened by Segway. My old account sed_awk is locked and the email account is an old account that no longer exists. I guess you might be one of those people that give us the dirty eye when we park in handicap parking spaces too. For your reading pleasure, I'm including a letter that I have drafted to send to Segway. If you don't know, there are really people out there with disabilities that are not always visible. Believe what you want, this is a real and legit posting. Dear Sir or Madam; Do you anticipate the possibility of persons with disabilities being able to submit a portion of the cost of the transporter to their insurance company, or do you know of any Federal grants that might be provided so that a person with a disability can obtain this? My wife, Caroline, was one of the youngest and is currently may be the longest living person with a condition called "Restricted Calcified Pericarditious." At 14, she had open-heart surgery where the pericardium, or the protective sack around her heart, was removed. As a result of this condition, she has serious valve damage and some leakage of blood to her liver. Preceding her surgery she suffered lung damage due to excess body fluid cause by the constriction of the calcified pericardium was placing on her heart. Caroline is very much a survivor. All of her doctors are amazed that she has made it past 30 without another surgery. Many were expecting her to at least have a pacemaker installed and are expecting an eventual heart transplant. Unlike many people with heart conditions, doctors have advised Caroline not to overexert herself to avoid any further damage to her heart valves and other components. I've heard many people criticize the Segway, touting it as a disappointment. For me, it is liberation. I dream of the day when she will be able to go to the mall and not have to leave a third of the way through because she is so wiped out from the physical exertion. Our last trip to Quincy Market almost landed her in the hospital. I was terrified that that was going to be the one. At 33, Caroline is an incredible person who does not want to believe that she has a disability. She wants to be able to do all of the things that anyone else can do. Unfortunately, she is currently confined to walking only short distances. I would love to have her work at my company, but the distance that she would have to travel, even from the handicap parking spaces. We will definitely be purchasing your product. Right now I working out the finances. In closing, I want to thank your company for all of the work you have done to develop this device. I also want to thank your company for your vision. Your product will eventually increase the quality of life for my wife and so many others in similar positions. The Segway, in my eyes, is a blessing. With Deep Respect and Warmest Thanks,

    2. Re:This was sed_awk2's first post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't think anyone doubts the sincerity of your feeling or the reality of your wife's problem. What struck me as odd was that you opened a brand-new account (or reopened a long dead one) just for the purpose of posting to this thread.

      No, this is not a new account opened by Segway.

      What I actually thought was that someone with ties to Segway had contacted you and asked you to post comments here. Was I wrong on that guess?

      I guess you might be one of those people that give us the dirty eye when we park in handicap parking spaces too.
      I often do feel like giving the dirty eye to apparently non-handicapped people taking up handicap parking places, but my fear of meeting a nut with an Uzi restrains me. Besides, if you have a handicap sticker, nobody should give you evil looks, and I wouldn't.

  189. Remember the iPod? by Drakonian · · Score: 1
    Agreed. Remember what Taco thought of the iPod when it was first announced? "Lame.", IIRC. Overpriced, blah blah blah. Same with the majority of highly moderated posts in the first iPod story. A year later, geeks are all over it like a fat kid on a Smartie. (Note: I'm not slamming it, I bought one too.)

    Let's not overreact here people. It might make us look stupid later.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  190. Snow tires video: B-) by oxytocin · · Score: 1

    Snow tires video:

    http://www.segway.com/video/snow.html

    super cool!

    I await mine with 'bated breath.

    p.s. people don't seem to realize that this is the first version of a new technology ... the first version is always very expensive, and evolves (usually) pretty quickly. I find it so ingenuine of people to discount the future of this based on its present (as if computers haven't "improved"!).

    Yay.

    --
    Oliver's Law: Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
  191. That's because you're not logged in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fat Hash Dollar-ups are what the modz smoke! Get an account,post a couple of posts, and wait for that 'Congratulations!..' message, and then it's Fat Hash Dollar-ups all the way, baby!

  192. Old people in Florida use electric motorbikes by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 2
    The vehicle looks like an old Vespa, with a nice big seat, places to rest your feet as you cruise along slowly, even room for a passenger in back, plus a basket for groceries. They have wide tires like motorcycles, not skinny ones like bicycles.

    IMO these would be much more helpful to old people than a Segway. And if you need one, your medical insurance pays for it, according to a TV commercial I saw there.

    Yes, they ride them on the sidewalks--slowly. And they all seem to be bright red. It looks very cheerful!

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
  193. please take the time to LEARN before you post! by marhar · · Score: 5, Informative
    OK, burning some karma here... there have been a lot of posts by people criticizing these things without apparently knowing anything about them.

    Before you jump to any conclusions, please read Dan Bricklin's commentary based on his real life experience in riding a segway:

    Thoughts before riding one
    Impressions after riding a Segway HT: part 1
    Impressions after riding a Segway HT: part 2 Especially note the sections "Isn't it just like a bicycle or a scooter?" and "How does a Segway fit in among regular walking and standing people?"

    1. Re:please take the time to LEARN before you post! by rtechie · · Score: 1

      You posted what can only be considered an ADVERTISEMENT for the Segway. Bricklin is downright fawning. The only criticism AT ALL of the vehicle is in a very short scetion called "Did you find any limits or problems?" in which he goes to great lengths to downplay the problems.

      He fails to mention the battery life at any point during the two articles. He fails to mention that it requires many hours of charging. He fails to mention the price ($5000). He compares it to bicycles, but only in the most unfavorable light. He does not really compare it to any sort of motorized scooters like this one, which is 1/3 of the price of a Segway.

      This is pure advertising and PR.

  194. Wow! Modded down and heavily criticized... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    Wow! Modded down and heavily criticized for saying something is funny!

    1. Re:Wow! Modded down and heavily criticized... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is expressing the irony of getting a negative response for his observation that the original post is a joke, and that he understands the joke. Rather than viewing his post as a helpful analysis of the joke, the Slashdot audience reacts with hostility, which puzzles Futurepower(R).

  195. There were lots of photos like that! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    Exactly!!! And, before the C5 was introduced, there were lots of photos like that! What could they have been thinking? My pick for the world's worst marketing.

  196. Are the specs too optimistic ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I looked at the specs on the company's website. It says that under 'ideal' conditions, i.e. billiard-flat perfect asphalt or concrete, no wind, no hills, constant speed, the thing can go 15 miles without recharging. The problem is, these 'ideal' conditions are rarely met in real life. Also, it doesn't say anything about the weight of the passenger. It only says that the maximum weight is 250 pounds. Now that's about my weight naked plus clothes plus shoes plus briefcase. How's that going to affect the range ? Are the specs valid only for, say 150 pounds people ???

  197. "Because death is a part of travel." by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2

    Good trademark. "Because death is a part of travel."

  198. Strange. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    They make it sound like people will be busting down doors for one. I don't know about you, but the price seems a bit steep to me.

  199. Re: And about collisions... by Tom+in+Boston · · Score: 1

    I also had the opportunity to use one for a few minutes. It was a blast.

    One of the points stressed by the Segway engineers who were demonstrating it was that collisions are not a big deal. To demonstrate, he drove toward a volunteer and hit him. The first thing that hits is the the handlebars, which are light. This causes the Segway to tip slightly backwards, which is a signal to the Segway that it should stop moving forwards and start moving backwards, which it did right away.

    Another important point is that the Segway doesn't automatically go 12 mph. It goes exactly as slowly as you want it to go.

    It has a small kickstand to hold it upright when you power it off, and seems to lean easily up against a wall, too.

    It was pretty simple and quiet and fun. It doesn't seem to me that it will cause chaos on sidewalks, but it'll be interesting to see what happens.

    Oh, BTW, a machine takes me to and from work each day (my Jeep,) but I haven't put on excessive weight as a result.

  200. Actually, this will be used on the new Segway by Nindalf · · Score: 2

    Body heat will be extracted via thermal probes at the conventional points used by thermometers. See South Park episode 511 "The Entity" for details.

    1. Re:Actually, this will be used on the new Segway by dildatron · · Score: 2

      That was probably the, if not one of, stupidest attempts at commedy I have ever seen.

      First, the southpark episode is not #511, it was afirst or second season episode, #24 if I remember correctly.

      Second, it wasn't called The Entity.

      I just wonder how people like you get out of bed and actually live without killing yourself. Luckily, evolution will take care of you in the long run.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    2. Re:Actually, this will be used on the new Segway by tomcode · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, but it still beats dealing with the airlines."

      --
      f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng
    3. Re:Actually, this will be used on the new Segway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell were you thinking when you wrote this? You obviously DIDN'T remember correctly - surely the fuzziness of your own memory must have alerted you? "Gee, I don't really know what they're talking about, they must be wrong"??

      First or second season? Holy shit, did you even SEE the first or second season? Do you think the show started when you first saw it?

      It's episode 511 - the 5 is for season 5, episode 11.

      And what the hell is up with your first comment? Are you aware that you don't make sense? Let me write your first sentence correctly for you (although only correct in expressing the opinion of a confirmed idiot)

      That was one of, if not THE, stupidest attempts at comedy I have ever seen. Your word order defies all logical interpretation.

  201. Have you ridden the Segway Twice? i didnt think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like so many of you had doubts about this product, but they were quickly wiped away as soon as I rode the segway.
    Yes, I have ridden the Segway TWICE! on seperate occasions. and once was in the development lab! (yes, i did see all the cool prototypes and such)
    I live in New Hampshire and just happened to be in the right place at the right time, so dont ask how it happened.
    I will undoubtably buy one as soon as I have the money (currently starving college student, so that may not be for a while :( .

    To answer some of your questions:
    1. Speed is not an issue. In fact I doubt many user will use it at top speed. Think about it. If you are riding a bike in a city you will probably never go faster than 15 miles an hour anyway.
    2. You cant really put a seat on it. Your body is crucial in controling it. which leads me to...
    3. It is increadiably easy to learn. When I was talking to one of the guys who worked on it the only problem with new users, is overconfindance.
    4. Yes, it is pricy. That is what I thought before i got a chance to try it. Now money is no object. When i have the money I will buy it, no questions asked. Yes I think it is that cool.
    5. I dont know if anybody asked this but the keys are incrediably cool. Each key is made specifically for the user and you can have custom settings, such as sensitivity, top speed, accerleration and such.

  202. Re:The English C4 was a plastic explosive car. by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    The English C4 was a plastic explosive car. It was quirky in the English tradition. It died immediately after introduction.

  203. Engine by dachshund · · Score: 2
    The word is that Kamen has a stirling engine-based generator that purifies water and generates electricity (here's one recent article. More on the stirling engine can be found here.

    I'm not convinced that this is an earth-shaking development, either. And it doesn't sound anything like what was hyped as Ginger, that is, if Ginger isn't the Segway... But who cares. This guy really shot his wad on the Segway-- if he comes up with something truly amazing, I'll be impressed when I see it running.

  204. How to look cool. by karate_mime · · Score: 1

    I think we need to consider an axiom of personal transportation: The skill required to operate a vehicle is proportional to how cool you look operating it.

    Thus by making the Segway really easy to operate they gaurantee you look like a retard on it.

  205. Might sell to the golf market by billstewart · · Score: 2

    That's an interesting idea. One of the big problems with Segway is that it costs a lot of money for something that doesn't offer a huge value. However, when you're talking about golf, a certain fraction of the market is about conspicuous consumption and doing things for fun, among people who have disposable income. So they might sell to either the golfers or to the courses, and for golfing, they really are superior to $300 electric scooters. How much does a basic golf cart cost, though?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Might sell to the golf market by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2

      It doesn't look good...

      This site has a 2002 Club Car for $5990 (I assume in C$, which would be about $4000 US). It even includes a canopy and sweater basket. Can't tell if it's new or not...but the bottom of the page says "All our golf cars are reconditioned, and carry a one year warranty". Also doesn't say if it includes a charger, etc.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  206. Too bad stupidity can't... by Nindalf · · Score: 1
  207. Not a seatbelt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not a seatbelt - it's a relective strip that you wear to improve visibity.

  208. Segways in Bike Lanes? by billstewart · · Score: 2
    Here in San Francisco, we have lots of bike lanes. Would a Segway survive in a bike lane, or would they get run over by cars and also get run over by bicycles?

    Cyclists older than first grade who ride on the sidewalk aren't safe - curb cuts, driveways, pedestrians, etc. are pretty dangerous, and cyclists are dangers to pedestrians. It's much safer for them to ride on the street, aggressively taking the middle of their lane, unless there's a bike lane available. Occasionally they'll get assaulted by cars (it's happened to me a few times), but then it cuts down on how often little old ladies stick umbrellas in their spokes.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  209. Re:To make this truly useful they need to do 2 thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3) Pr... err... sorry, couldn't resist.

  210. The French can't stop the segway... by deft · · Score: 2

    the segways are coming in, and they will accept them, even welcome them.

    just get a few germans to drive them in, no prob. they will probably even have a parade.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  211. meeting the demand... by f64 · · Score: 1

    "...Segway believes it has enough manufacturing capacity to meet demand..."

    considering that they'll only get oh, 16-17 of these sold, i'm not surprized.

    f64 : dada m'dah dada

  212. And you can land on your face from a bump by complexmath · · Score: 1

    in the road.

    Really, now. It may be an innivative design, but there are practical reasons why existing designs have their weels inline rather than parallel. Why would I pay thousands of dollars for an electric scooter that's got inherent design flaws the $400 ones don't? Sure hitting a big bump may be considered user error, but MS could claim its GPFs were the result of user error as well. How about someone release a $4000 scooter whose innovations relate to the power supply? That's where the real problem lies.

  213. New toy of ye olde Admin??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have these things at U of Toledo all the time. The people that use them are a bunch of overweight, palid, bearded 40 yr. olds (our Unix admins??) They are pretty cool gadgets though..

  214. They are safe by Ianworld · · Score: 0

    As a member of the US FIRST robotics competition i'm a big fan of kamen. He really is taking the technology that has been developed in the past 20 years of the computer and technology revolution and put it into usefull machines. The segway is just another amazing step. Many of my friends on our robotics team got a chance to try it.(i was too busy fixing our robot) Everyone said it was amazing. The leaning people talk about is almost non existent. Its more like leaning to take a step. Oh and proof that i can be used everywhere. Dean Kamen was spotted going into the bathroom on the segway. We didn't check to see if he got off ;)

  215. Just rode it at comdex by Maxwell · · Score: 1

    extremly cool. a razor scooter for adults. I see them on yachts (good bye 50cc moped headaches!) big motorhomes, campgrounds, large malls...

    Replace car? no. replace soooters/mopeds/3 wheeled bikes? in lots of cases, yeah? If a company can cut a min wage mail delivery boy by putting someone on a segway, they'll do it...

    Yes, comdex is really small it does NOT even fill the LV convention center. ouch.

    JON

  216. you're != your by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "you're" is a contraction of "you" and "are".

    "your" is posessive.

  217. Rent it by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure we'll see companies trying to lease or rent segways to the end consumers similar to cars.

  218. In praise of technology--and caution too. by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Kamen has done lots of cool stuff, and the Segway is a gorgeous piece of technology. I think all of us, even the most negative, would enjoy trying one out. Nevertheless!

    The news story we are commenting on is not "Segway invented." It is "Segway for sale." If someone is thinking about buying a Segway, that person should consider the speculation about reliability, insurance, state laws, public acceptance (whether or not the thing is *perceived* as safe). Because you could end up with a $5000 vehicle you use everywhere, or you could end up with a $5000 doorstop.

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
  219. I've been hit and run over by a segway by Dai_Quat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was by my own request. I actually had one run into me (at a low speed), and had it run over my foot (at a low speed).

    This was to test the claims of safety that 1: the automatic braking stops the vehicle before momentum is transferred and 2, the wheels are large and soft enough to absorb most of the weight of the device.

    I am pleased to announce that I still have full use of my foot, and it did not knock me down (I am a 6'1 man who weighs 150 lbs.) A wheel rolling over my foot hurt a heck of a lot less than if that same person stepped on my foot. And again, this thing is so agile and can be operated so slowly and carefully that it would be very hard to run over a foot by accident.

    So people, conjecture all you like, and draw comparisons to bicycles and skateboards, but learn HOW this device works before you argue to ban it.

    I've actually had it hit me. Can anyone else here say that? It has a rubber-padded handlebars that contacted my shoulder first. Contact with my shoulders forced it upright, whereupon it stopped immediately and broke no traction with the ground. These aren't skid-brakes, they are anti-lock regenerative brakes. Had it been going faster, it would have hit me with LESS force than a man travelling at the same speed.

    People picture these things whizzing up and down a sidewalk at full speed, or picture bicycle speeds. A segway in crowded situations reqiures slower speeds than bicycles. But unlike bicycles that become uncontrolable at low speeds, the Segway retains control. I saw one operating in literally shoulder-to-shoulder pedestrian traffic at Disneyland. Children in front of it, and old folks to the sides of it, in a sea of people, and it was perfectly safe. Try that with a bike or skateboard. Anywhere it is safe to use a wheelchair, it is safe to use a segway.

    The only things to worry about with these things is people who use them unsafely. But that's a personal responsibility issue, and a personal liability issue, and that exists already with bikes, skateboards, roller-skates, walking, etc. I'd expect the Libertarian Slashdot Brigade would at least accept THAT argument!

  220. This might do very well in Holland... by weiyuent · · Score: 1

    ...and other countries with ubiquitous lanes for low-speed (scooters and bikes) traffic. In fact, city-dwelling Western Europeans in general would likely welcome the Segway much more willingly than Americans. No knee-jerk bias towards cars.

  221. Colorado Segway Wannabe by Moki_man · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if I can get these with snow tires?

  222. This thing fascinates me by AbRASiON · · Score: 0

    It defies logic (as I previously knew it)

    I'd love to ride one, however considering how limited interest is in the US, I dare say we'd be lucky to get more than 5 in Australia over the next few years, plus I doubt any of the owners of these will be willing to let all the curious ones have a go..

    bugger!

  223. been out by snyrt · · Score: 1

    i don't know how long they've been out, at least in prototype, but where i live (alexandria, VA a couple miles outside Washington D.C.) there was a guy riding one on halloween night. i didn't get the chance to talk to him, but i was quite amazed by the sight. right now i'm in the process of tracking him down to ask for a ride. i'm savin' up for one myself.

    --
    -"Hey, Baby. It's not a rash, it's textured love."
  224. Most overhyped and overpriced toy ever? by kawaii · · Score: 1
    I don't think so. What about the tablet PC?

    -nh

  225. Origin of this joke by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

    This is, of course, just the text version of a this fabulous cartoon.

  226. Re:Slashdotters hate Vettes? (was Re:C5) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vettes are dumb cars anyway...

    When will americans realise that sports and racing cars come from Japan and Europe and that they have no clue how to build a decent one...

  227. Mock if you like, it might be practical for me. by superdude72 · · Score: 1

    Mock if you like, I think the Segway would be practicle transportation for me if it works as advertised. I live in San Francisco, which is very compact but which also has very steep hills and the worst traffic this side of Manhattan. The ability to travel up to 12mph, without regard for hills, would enable me to reach virtually anywhere in the city in a reasonable amount of time. Yeah, I could also ride a bike, but I'd get all sweaty going uphill, and who wants to get all sweaty in your nice clothes biking to work? Also, I'd be biking in traffic with cars whose drivers hate my guts for asserting my legal right to mess up the flow of traffic. Moreover, the bike may not be an option when I'm no longer young and fit.

    Granted, most people in the US don't live in compact, densely populated, hilly cities. I just wanted to speak up for the people who do. The Segway might have a better chance in Europe and Japan.

  228. Overhyped? by Bartmoss · · Score: 2

    Not in my book. I find this thing really great, the only problem being the seemingly low power supply. Here in Germany, Mercedes started to sell a card called a "smart" which is basically a tiny, light, cheap, two seat car. (Probably avilable internationally too, I am not an expert on cars.) First, everybody made jokes about them, but guess what - they sell! Why? They get people around, they are cheaper than normal cars, they need relatively little gas, and above all they are small and can park where normal cars do not have space.

    Enter the segway. Yes, it's not for long distance travel and yet it's not for people who want to lug around a lot of stuff. But for those short-distance trips, it's perfect. Especially in the US - When I was in southern Maine, we would drive everywhere, even if it was just 5 minutes away, simply because there were no real sidewalks (and way too much car traffic for my poor safety-loving European mind). ;-)

    Also don't forget that a lot of people (especially the elderly) cannot walk well anymore, and while they still do not need a wheelchair, they are really not very mobile. Maybe a segway would be the perfect solution for them.

    I do not see it replacing the car, mostly because you cannot transport anything with them that doesn't fit a backpack; but it might well take some load off of the roads and reduce some parking problems.

  229. Technology returns.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be interested in buying a segway, ripping out the gyro control system and use it to finally get my battle mech to stop stumbling forward every three steps. :D

    (no, really, jokes aside i think that artificial legs are the next step for the segway guy, and when that happens who's to make it so they don't also make an XL model with miniguns and a katana?)

  230. Re:Observations (no conclusions) of Segway in Atla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about getting back horses?

  231. Honda Cabina by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    You see these things ALL OVER Tokyo...Cool!

    --
    **>>BELCH
  232. Good news for disabled by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 2
    If you know someone who has trouble walking, what about an electric scooter? There are a bunch of models for sale at Invacare , and probably other manufacturers also.

    I looked at the spec sheet for their Zoom 3 model, here's how it stacks up against a Segway's specs on Amazon.

    Weight: Segway: 83 lbs Zoom: 96 lbs
    Width: Segway: 25" . Zoom: 22"
    Seat: Segway: no. Zoom: yes
    Range on full battery: both claim 10-15 mi.
    Warranty: Segway: 12 mo. Zoom: 18 mo.
    Available: Segway: March. Zoom: now. Top speed: Segway: 12 mph Zoom: 3.5 mph
    Price: Segway: $4950. Zoom: $1695.

    These scooters, like Segways, are meant to be used on a sidewalk.

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
  233. Exsisting electric scooters by Felinoid · · Score: 2

    I noticed the electric scooter sales started going up shortly after the announcement of this wonderful device.
    Only the scooters are better designed for the avrage consummer. In otherwords they are cheap.

    I've thought buy a new video card or buy a scooter. I ended up updating my PDA but I could do it on a whim.

    The street legal scooters are bulky enough but I could pack it up and take it with me on the plane. Asumming they don't lose it in luggage I don't need to rent a car or take a taxi.

    Eah but who am I kidding I don't like driving.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  234. That's not very original... by tomcode · · Score: 1

    It's been done.

    http://www.futurehorizons.net/jetpacks.htm

    --
    f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng
  235. Totally offtopic by wurp · · Score: 1
    I just wanted to apologize for a reply that I made to you on an old message. You had made a comment about someone verbing a noun, and I replied correcting you. In that reply, I was an ass. You replied most graciously to my asinine comment.


    Anyway, FWIW, I'm sorry that I was an ass.

    1. Re:Totally offtopic by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      Anyway, FWIW, I'm sorry that I was an ass

      S'ok. We all act like an ass occasionally. I only decide someone's a real ass if they do it consistently.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  236. Cool, didn't realize we were special! by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2

    Damn my lucky mailman/woman!!!!

  237. Oh I know how we did it! by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2

    We have the nations Postal Training Center in Norman (it's off Hwy 9).

    My wife was doing some temp work there in college and got to meet the postmaster general. Everyone there thought it was cool. She was unenthusiastic to say the least. Kind of like meeting Nimoy when you're not a Sci Fi fan!!!

  238. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    The net is like a vast sea of lutefisk with tiny dinosaur brains embedded
    in it here and there. Any given spoonful will likely have an IQ of 1, but
    occasional spoonfuls may have an IQ more than six times that!
    -- James 'Kibo' Parry

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...