Slashdot Mirror


Pancake Physics to Cut Batter Splatter

Anonymous Coward writes "The headline just about says it all on this one. A physics grad student in the UK has come up with the mathematical formula for how to flip a pancake and have it land correctly back in the pan. The BBC has the details."

298 comments

  1. Ah-hah! by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 4, Funny

    His secret is revealed: The angular velocity of the object equals the square root of Pi, times the gravity divided by the distance the pancake is from the elbow times four - that is how to get the pancake back in the pan.

    Seriously, mimicing real life movement in mathematical forumla is a tough one (that's why we don't see any battlemechs walking around, or tons of popular robots in every house hold.

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:Ah-hah! by Zenjive · · Score: 2, Funny

      The angular velocity of the object equals the square root of Pi, times the gravity divided by the distance the pancake is from the elbow times four - that is how to get the pancake back in the pan.

      Would that be an African or European swallow?

      --


      A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with. - Tennessee Williams
    2. Re:Ah-hah! by TopShelf · · Score: 1
      For something this (relatively) simply, it works pretty well. It's not like you have to worry about wind drag or something.

      Since I have year-old twins that are just starting to eat pancakes, this will come in handy!

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    3. Re:Ah-hah! by ThatMadeNoSense · · Score: 1

      For something this (relatively) simply, it works pretty well.

      That made no sense.

    4. Re:Ah-hah! by king_penguin_05 · · Score: 1

      It was probably assumed that all pancakes are of equal size and spherical.

      --
      "I can't drive 55. It only goes 38."
    5. Re:Ah-hah! by darqchild · · Score: 1

      ahh... if only i had mod points!
      Mod the parent up! ( or give him a grail)

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
  2. Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by marnanel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Americans should bear in mind that what are called "pancakes" in England are called "crepes" in America. What are called "pancakes" in America are called "Scotch pancakes" in the south of England, and "drop scones" in Scotland and the north of England. Meanwhile, "flapjacks" are a kind of oaty biscuit. Confused yet?

    --
    GROGGS: alive and well and living in
    1. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by Xxanmorph · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too much information about other countries! My american brain can't take it!

    2. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, "flapjacks" are a kind of oaty biscuit. Confused yet?

      They weren't always the oaty biscuit (cookie for you 'merkins). Check out the "Schizoid Man" episode of the Prisoner if you want to see how language has evolved :)

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    3. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      Having been in London recently, and yearning for American pancakes, I had no problem finding many restaurants offering American pancakes and calling them... guess what... "pancakes". Looks like we're rewriting English once again.

    4. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by jesus_watkins · · Score: 1
      Americans should bear in mind that what are called "pancakes" in England are called "crepes" in America. What are called "pancakes" in America are called "Scotch pancakes" in the south of England, and "drop scones" in Scotland and the north of England. Meanwhile, "flapjacks" are a kind of oaty biscuit. Confused yet?

      That all seems straightforward. But in England I saw a shop that sold "crepes" as well as pancakes. So what would Americans call an English crepe?

    5. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by marnanel · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. To me, it would suggest that they had unusual fillings like fruit and cream and so on, rather than the traditional English way of serving them with lemon and sugar.

      --
      GROGGS: alive and well and living in
    6. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      And to add to the confusion, crepes really are french, originally ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    7. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by mccalli · · Score: 1
      But in England I saw a shop that sold "crepes" as well as pancakes.

      Crepes are thinner and often smaller than pancakes. They're French originally (as I'm sure you knew already...).

      Cheers,
      Ian

    8. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by teaserX · · Score: 1

      Americans should bear in mind that in Canada they're called "Back cakes" also...
      "... equals the square root of Pi, times the gravity divided by the distance the pancake is from the elbow times four ...
      You'll have to double that and add 30.

      --
      We really need your help
      http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
    9. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      Confused yet?

      Actually, what I found more "confusing" was the bit at the end of the article about more Britons preferring lemon and sugar on their pancakes... Bleh. :)

      Incidentally, I'm from New England, where a milkshake is only a milkshake if it has no ice cream in it, otherwise it's a frappe (unless you're in Rhode Island, where it's a cabinet), unless the ice cream is not blended, in which case it's a float.

      -T

    10. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by Dexx · · Score: 1

      They are? Never heard that term before, and I'm Canadian...

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
    11. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by reidbold · · Score: 1

      In my Canada we call them... pancakes.

      --
      -Reid
    12. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      When I was 6 (many many many moons ago), we lived in Boston for a year. I still remember my sister ordering a chocolate milkshake, and getting...

      Chocolate milk shaken up (not stirred :-P)... She then found out she had wanted a "frappe".

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    13. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by rigelstar · · Score: 1

      The real source of the quote:

      "People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them Benjamin Franklin said it first."

      David H Comins

    14. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by Zordak · · Score: 1

      Damn Yankees and your corrupt food terminology with "pop" in your "floats" and no ice cream in your shakes. It must be another liberal conspiracy. Now, where did I put my Big Red and Moon Pie.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    15. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by Xxanmorph · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. I've got the real person, but I'd never heard of him so in the spirit of the quote...

    16. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      I grew up in New York, and ever milkshake I ordered had ice cream in it. I also never saw anything called a "frappe".

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    17. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by bitrott · · Score: 1

      HA HA Some stereotypes NEVER get old!

    18. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      I grew up in New York, and ever milkshake I ordered had ice cream in it. I also never saw anything called a "frappe".

      Arrrgh, you arrogant New Yorkers... New York is not part of New England! ;)

      Here, we're civilized, and have frappes.

      -T

    19. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by beelz · · Score: 2, Funny

      no, no, no... the REAL quote follows:

      "People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them that Benjamin Franklin said it first" - Benjamin Franklin

    20. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by Nexus+Seven · · Score: 1

      London is geared pretty well to the expectations of the visiting American - hence the cheesy souvenir shops and bureau-de-changes everywhere.

      I wouldn't expect American pancakes outside the tourist hotspots though.

    21. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by E-prospero · · Score: 1

      Down here in Australia, US:Crepe = AUS:pancake, and US:pancake = AUS:pikelet. I believe there are parts of England where this is also the case.

      Russ %-)

      --
      ... and never, ever play leapfrog with a unicorn.
    22. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by teaserX · · Score: 1

      It was a joke. Apparently about a 3.5 on the Dennis Miller scale. Don't worry about it. ;-)

      --
      We really need your help
      http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
    23. Re:Pancakes, crepes, flapjack... by Uncle+Flip · · Score: 1

      Heh...reminds me of the Boston geography found on the International Junk Mail Clearinghouse:

      "The geographical center of Boston is in Roxbury. Due north of the center we find the South End. This is not to be confused with South Boston, which lies directly east from the South End. North of the South End is East Boston and southwest of East Boston is the North End. Back Bay was filled in years ago.."

      Be well
      -UF

  3. I'm gonna nit pick. by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It will make sure the pancake will land back in the pan, as long as you understand the formula.

    Understanding something does not equate to being able to do it.

    I understand how a plane flies, but I can't fly one.

    1. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by ender81b · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Heh. I'm a line cook here in the US and there is quite a bit more to flipping American Pancakes (I realize english pancakes are somewhat different).

      Stuff like how long you wait till you flip it, the perfect angle to get the spatula underneath the pancake (directly parallel to both the grill and the pancake), what to do with blueberry/raspberry/banana/etc pancakes, what to do when the cake sticks, and the rest. I'm sure you could come up with an equation to perfectly predict this and it wouldn't mean a damm thing -- like this one.

      I mean you could equally use a formula to try and tell somebody how to flip eggs and it wouldn't meen a damm thing. To train line cooks to flip the proper, and perfect, Over Easy egg requires about 100-200 wasted eggs until you get it down to about 95% of the time -- and that extra 5% is a pain since each egg varies in how much force will require before it breaks, etc and usually requires thousands of eggs before you can go nearly an entire 8 hour shift without breaking at least 1 yolk open. By 'flip' an egg I mean using only your wrist, no sissy spatulas involved. It takes alot of work and effort to learn to do these things which is why almost nobody outside cooks can probably cook eggs or omeletes the *right way*, no spatulas/informercial specials involved.

    2. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by arvindn · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You are mistaken.

      http://catb.org/esr/jargon/html/Some-AI-Koans.html :

      A novice was trying to fix a broken Lisp machine by turning the power off and on.

      Knight, seeing what the student was doing, spoke sternly: "You cannot fix a machine by just power-cycling it with no understanding of what is going wrong."

      Knight turned the machine off and on.

      The machine worked.

      In the same way, the pancake will land back in the pan as long as you understand the formula.

      [[Mods, mods: this is supposed to be _funny_. Its not the first time I've posted something hilarious and it got modded "Insightful"]].

    3. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by DrMrLordX · · Score: 0

      Once you have your cyber-arm installed, and you have wired reflexes level 3 and a reflex recorder, you can use the formula to pre-program the perfect pancake flip. And a few other things, too . . .

    4. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by buswolley · · Score: 1

      but why is it important to flip it in the air?

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    5. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by lordsid · · Score: 1

      i too am a line cook for the university in my area, i found the best way to flip real "pancakes" i.e. american ones is wait till the bottom edges of the pancake start to lightly brown, then hold a spatual upside down, go under the pancake and turn it over to the side, by far the fastest, easiest, and safest way to do it.

      ====

      on a side note what the hell is wrong with these limeys?

      The survey also found half of all those questioned north of the border like cheese in their pancakes. In the West country, pancake lovers had a sweeter tooth, with jam and Golden Syrup the favourites, while 60% of the UK's population still enjoy lemon and sugar on their pancakes.

      lemon and sugar?

      --
      IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
    6. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1, Funny
      Once you've got to a couple of hundred digits, consider saying in your .sig how many digits you know

      So far I'm up to three.

    7. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really? I bet you think planes fly "because" the air moves faster on the upper surface, reducing its pressure relative to the slower moving air on the lower surface.

      Like all good high-school physics explanations, that's utter rubbish!. While there is some small effect from the above, planes generate sufficient lift to fly due to downward vortex shedding at their wing trailing edges.

    8. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "pancakes" in England/Ireland means what americans call "crepes". Lemon+sugar goes well with them. You sprinkle sugar on the crepe, give it a dash of lemon, and roll it up. The very fact you can roll them should tell you that they are very different to American pancakes.

      "Scotch pancakes" or "drop scones" are what americans call "pancakes".

    9. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      No sane cook would "flip" a real pancake, that is one that is big enough to serve as a meal. Put a flat object with a handle upside down on the pan, turn the whole thing around, and let the pancake slide from the flat object back into the pan.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    10. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ender81b says
      I'm a line cook here in the US
      Sorry, but you misspelled homo. Hope this helps. Cheers.
    11. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by fyonn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you a geek? Be proud of it. Prove it. Memorize 1000 digits of pi!

      I can remember *all* of the digits to pi

      now the order.. thats a different matter...

      dave

    12. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by troc · · Score: 1

      Lemon and Sugar...........

      don't knock it until you've tried it, it's much nicer than you think ;)

      Then again, here in Holland we eat huge (in diameter, not in thickness) pancakes filled with complete meals. Yum.

      And the Dutch delicacy of Poffertjes is worth trying - small pancakes smothered in butter and icing sugar. Not recommended for those with a cholesterol problem ;)

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    13. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Atrahasis · · Score: 1

      Scotch pancake != drop scone.
      Scotch pancakes are much fluffier, more a sort of cake consistency, while drop scones are smaller, and midway between scotch and common or garden pancakes.

    14. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 0


      I'm a line cook here in the US and there is quite a bit more to flipping American Pancakes

      No offense, sir, but it never ceases to amaze me the wide variety that is the slashdot readership.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    15. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Echnin · · Score: 1
      Like, "crepes" is French, ain't it?

      American pancakes are stupid; sure, they're kinda bigger than the French or British pancakes, but have you ever had DUTCH pancakes? Now THOSE are HUGE!

      --
      Lalala
    16. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Repran · · Score: 1

      I even managed to make the pancacke land in the pan long before ever hearing of - let alone: understanding - this formula. Yet I applyed it just the same.

      --

      -- Contradictions only exist in thought - not in reality.

    17. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Understanding something does not equate to being able to do it.

      I understand how a plane flies, but I can't fly one.


      Firstly your comparison is off - you do not understand how to fly a plane and cannot fly one.

      Secondly I think I'll argue with the whole thing. I'm going to say that there is not a difference between understanding how to do this sort of thing and being able to do it.

      I'll agree that understanding how a plane flies does not mean you can fly but understanding how something is done precisely means being able to do it.

      I'll leave aside arguing that although you may be able to work with these formulas that decribe the pancake tossing method your actual understanding of it is not enhanced by them at all.

      I'll work along the lines that understanding a physical process of this sort in which one is personally involved is something that does not involve the intellect alone but the whole biomechanical feedback system that is your body (or at least the involved parts thereof).

      I'll claim that just as a person blind from birth cannot understand fully the concept of seeing, a person who never has successfully flipped a pancake (or perhaps even a person who cannot reliably flip a pancake) cannot be said to understand pancake flipping.

      I'll put forward the suggestion that someone who claims that they understand the idea but just can't do it is in fact failing to understand some key part - possibly because it cannot be described to them in a way that makes sense to them or possibly because their understanding of their own bodies is limited and in turn limits their understanding of the process.

      I'll do all this after lunch though because I'm now very hungry indeed.

    18. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still can't beat the good old neural net in your brain to learn to do this over time. I think I did pretty back in the old day flipping dinner plate size pan cakes.

    19. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      you were able to afford a computer?

      -50000000000 karma points

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    20. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by ender81b · · Score: 1

      For eggs it is necassary to cook them on both sides obviously. Also, those little gimmicks won't work for line cooks because you can flip them in the air faster than anything with a spatula or other method and also because they don't necassarily work all the time.

      Basically for time saving. When you are cooking 20 eggs/omelettes at a time you have to be able to flip them in about 2-3 seconds, not waste a minute or more gently flipping them over/using some other method.

    21. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by ender81b · · Score: 1

      nah I stole it.

      Heh believe it or not cooking pays fairly well for a college job. 10-12$ dollars an hour.

    22. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by delcielo · · Score: 1

      I understand how a plane flies, but I can't fly one.

      You pull back it goes up. You push forward it goes down. Left is left and right is right. What more do you need to know? Hey! You're a pilot!

      We'll see who catches that movie reference.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    23. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Discordantus · · Score: 1

      It's easy to get a couple thousand of them in order - just start somewhere in the middle...

    24. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by jackbox · · Score: 1

      By 'flip' an egg I mean using only your wrist, no sissy spatulas involved.

      Well, call me a sissy, but if there's an egg frying on a hot griddle, I'm gonna use a spatula, not try to stick my wrist under the egg to flip it. (rimshot)

    25. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really know 52 digits of pi.. now all I have to do is find the one girl out there that thinks that's hot and I'm all set :)

  4. [licking lips] by Nevrar · · Score: 0, Funny

    MmMmm... Pancakes...

    --
    Nevrar
  5. Mine always land in the pan... by Jason1729 · · Score: 0, Funny

    But then I use a spatula

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

  6. Sounds good by trotski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But since most of us geeks are pretty inept when it comes to anything physical, I still think my pancakes gonna land on the floor, no matter what formulas I apply.

    Now if we could only have some kind of a pancake flipping robot.....

    --

    "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    1. Re:Sounds good by revmoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now if we could only have some kind of a pancake flipping robot.....

      Yes, leave it to geeks to spend thousands of dollars, and countless man-hours developing a machine to flip a pancake over.

      --
      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
    2. Re:Sounds good by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 1, Informative
      block quote of the article:

      His theoretical work laid the groundwork for students designing a pancake-tossing machine, which could one day become a feature in every home.

      Someone's already in the process of beating you to the punch.

    3. Re:Sounds good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Down with stereotyping! I know a whole bunch of geeks who amuse themselves by juggling (and not just the standard pattern with a mere 3 balls either).

      Personally I don't juggle. Instead I do martial arts, I bike, and I play the piano. Yeah, all solitary activities - but you wouldn't confuse them with "sitting behind a computer all day" either.

    4. Re:Sounds good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like a spatula?

    5. Re:Sounds good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. It'll sit in my closet next to my George Foreman grill and my Hot Dog Electrocuter.

      I just want to see the late-night TV ad.

    6. Re:Sounds good by Tackhead · · Score: 1

      >> Now if we could only have some kind of a pancake flipping robot.....
      >
      > Yes, leave it to geeks to spend thousands of dollars, and countless man-hours developing a machine to flip a pancake over.
      >
      > [.sig] Too much of a good thing is an awesome thing, but too much of an awesome thing is really really stupid.

      And even more of an awesome thing than that ...is a surefire way to get your web site with a pancake-flipping robot slashdotted!

    7. Re:Sounds good by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      The CMU Robotics club actually has a project to make a pancake flipping robot :)

    8. Re:Sounds good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For everyone who thinks that flipping pancakes is somehow hard, I present this link:

      Ooo, clicky

      That holds true for what WE call pancakes - batter spread thinly across the base of the pan. Trust Usonians to take a perfectly good pre-existing word and use it for something else... and yet they take shots at the French!

  7. In other news by djupedal · · Score: 3, Funny

    "A pancake in the UK has come up with the mathematical formula for how to flip a physics grad student and have him land correctly back in the pan. The BBC has the details."

  8. Pancake day was Tuesday by fruey · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Shrove Tuesday (or pancake day) or "Mardi Gras" was on Tuesday. Why is this not posted until Thursday then? The pancake stories were for pancake day.

    I am British BTW, so that means I think pancakes are pancakes, not those HUGE dripping in syrup (I wonder why Americans are overweight) batter mountains that you in the US eat ;-)

    p.s. I'm joking, taking a rise... I love US based pancakes although I've only ever eaten them in Haiti at the Villa Creole. But it's a statistical fact that the average American is overweight and I'm sure all this oversize stuff you do is the cause of it.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Pancake day was Tuesday by G-funk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The average american isn't the only one overweight. So are the english and us aussies. Americans eat a lot of sweet stuff, and they eat bigger serves than we do, but the english tend to use gallons of lard when cooking at home whereas americans and aussies would use a little margarine. Basically, your average westerner is a fat prick, no matter what country you're in.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:Pancake day was Tuesday by fruey · · Score: 1
      OK but let's just say that the average American is just a bit lardier than your average Brit or Aussie. I've been to the US and am from the UK, so I can reasonably say that the heavier were the US people. Never been to Oz though, can only quote David Boon and Shane Warne as examples of lardy people who qualify as "athletes" almost in Oz.

      British women are on the lardy side though, I'll give you that.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    3. Re:Pancake day was Tuesday by G-funk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You don't follow cricket do you? Warney was fat, but he's a friggen axe now... And booney was a flamin champion! Holy crap can he drink :)

      Of course the night i saw merv drinking in a pub only to find he drinks not XXXX, not VB or melbourne, not even (shudder) fosters, but CORONA... well that shattered my faith in the order of the world.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    4. Re:Pancake day was Tuesday by Narcissus · · Score: 1

      Warney might be a friggen axe, but don't forget that we have his mum to thank a lot for that. I just wish that my old lady was nice enough to feed me as many pills as she did :)

    5. Re:Pancake day was Tuesday by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I am British BTW, so that means I think pancakes are pancakes, not those HUGE dripping in syrup

      I think the word you're looking for, or at least what I call British pancakes is "Flapjacks".

      Pancakes is reserved by Americans. They trademarked it first! Dibs!

      [ That's what I miss from the US. IHOPs and Waffle Houses all over. ]

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    6. Re:Pancake day was Tuesday by shepd · · Score: 1

      I'll add a little steam to the debate:

      Whether Americans are fatter than the British or not, the net effect of the difference is negligible as far as life expectancy goes.

      So, live in whichever country that has the food you like. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:Pancake day was Tuesday by G-funk · · Score: 0

      After all, it's speaking english that kills you.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    8. Re:Pancake day was Tuesday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, your average westerner is a fat prick, no matter what country you're in.

      True. Americans are pretty much the fattest people in the world, with roughly 2/3 being overweight. But it is also true that more than half of the English are overweight.

      The primary problem is the modern sedentary lifestyle. Diet is also a huge problem. In my view, proper exercise is what we most need to encourage.

      --A not-overweight American (5' 9", 150 lb. == 175 cm, 68 kg)

    9. Re:Pancake day was Tuesday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black Caps to win the world cup. Aussies go home!

  9. Butter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you butter both sides, will it land on its edge?

    A better question, what if you butter the edge as well?

    1. Re:Butter! by $$$exy+Gwen+Araujo · · Score: 2, Funny

      A better question, what if you butter the edge as well? It spins indefinately? Seriously, butter some bread and attach it to a cat, then throw it up in the air. Cats always land on their feet, but bread always lands butter side down, so the cat/bread combination will spin round and round indefinately. Have you ever been inside a power plant?

      --

      I'm a girl too! See naked chicks in my journal!
    2. Re:Butter! by Ashtead · · Score: 5, Funny
      Actually, the study of bread falling off table was taking into account the starting position which is on the table and with the buttered side up. Seems the height of the table and the inertial torque of the bread conspire to make it roll somewhere between 1/4 and 3/4 turns, and therefore fall face down more often than not. With subsequent need for cleanup. If the table had been about twice as tall as a standard table (60 in instead of 30 in) the pieces of bread would have time to tumble one full turn and thus fall face up.

      Falling cats are famously able to turn around and land on their feet. Unless the height of the fall is too large, the cat has no problems with that. I forgot the exact conditions of falling cats, but they are able to turn around in a fall in a lot less than the 30 inches down from a table.

      If the two were to be combined and the cat has a piece of bread strapped to it, it is the cat that prevails, being more active, heavier, and having a larger moment of inertia.

      I'd imagine that the same would apply to pancakes, and I have disregarded the risk of the cat eating the food.

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
    3. Re:Butter! by theperplepigg · · Score: 0
      where's the +1 Geeky moderation when you need it? That was awesome.

      --paul

      --
      -- Every time you kill a kitten, God masturbates.
    4. Re:Butter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think the answer will depend on if this is a classical cat or a schroedinger cat.
      The results are really interesting if they are two mad schroedinger cats since they will become entangled. Of course there may be problems with tufts of fur getting in the butter or pancakes.

    5. Re:Butter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AH Hhahahahahaha!!!!!

      YES! :)

  10. Shrove Tuesday (why the BBC ran the story then) by WebfishUK · · Score: 5, Informative



    Not sure about other countries but last Tuesday (4th) was Shrove Tuesday in the UK when we all make pancakes. For the religious amongst you the word 'Shrove' refers to the practice of confessing of sins, then afterwards the fast of Lent could be considered a penance of faults committed. Thats why the BBC ran the story on Tuesday. However, most of us just love eating the pancakes!

    --
    -- "Can't sleep, clowns will eat me!"
    1. Re:Shrove Tuesday (why the BBC ran the story then) by HumanXX · · Score: 3, Informative
      Shrove Tuesday is the day before Ash Wednesday, the start of Lent, the period of 40 days leading upto Easter where people would originally go without eating various dairy products for that period. History was that people would use up all the eggs, and milk in the house, so someone came upon the idea of making pancakes.

      I made some cracking pancakes on Tuesday, my special recipe involves grating bits of lemon and lime rind into the batter, mmmmm, that citrus flavour flows all through the pancakes, nice.

      I am not religious but it is always useful to know about as many different religions as possible as this gives you many excuses to feast, well that and setting off lots of fireworks.

    2. Re:Shrove Tuesday (why the BBC ran the story then) by Surak · · Score: 1

      Not sure about other countries but last Tuesday (4th) was Shrove Tuesday in the UK when we all make pancakes. For the religious amongst you the word 'Shrove' refers to the practice of confessing of sins, then afterwards the fast of Lent could be considered a penance of faults committed. Thats why the BBC ran the story on Tuesday. However, most of us just love eating the pancakes!

      Here in America, we call it "Fat Tuesday" (fitting considering the extra weight most Americans carry isn't it? ;) )

      I'm from Detroit, and we have a large Polish population here (according to one statistic, Hamtramck has the largest population density of Polish people outside of Warsaw) and so here we have the old tradition of eating paczkis, which are pastries of Polish origin not entirely unlike a jelly donut (but don't *them* that, it's SACRILEGE to compare a paczki to a jelly donut). The paczki is one of my greatest personal weaknesses. :)

    3. Re:Shrove Tuesday (why the BBC ran the story then) by CharlieG · · Score: 0

      Or in French speaking parts Mardi Gras - "Fat Tuesday"

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    4. Re:Shrove Tuesday (why the BBC ran the story then) by mj01nir · · Score: 1

      Not sure about other countries but last Tuesday (4th) was Shrove Tuesday in the UK when we all make pancakes.

      Heh. In a large chunk of Catholic-dominated societies last Tuesday was Fat Tuesday / Mardi Gras / Carnival, celebrated by:

      Drinking copious amounts of alcohol
      Watching nubile young women disrobe
      Dancing in the streets
      Throwing / catching small trinkets (such as strings of beads) for good luck

      You Brits need to get with it!

      I've had the good fun of being on a float in one of St. Louis' Mardi Gras parades for several years now. This year my wife was queen of the float (yes, she found the baby in the king cake). So guess who got to ride up front with her? I'm still hoarse! :^)

      --
      the no .sig .sig
    5. Re:Shrove Tuesday (why the BBC ran the story then) by Unbeliever · · Score: 1
      Lent, the period of 40 days leading upto Easter
      46 days, or 6 1/2 weeks, actually. The 6 Sundays (including Easter) don't count in the 40 days thing.
      --
      --Carlos V.
  11. Tiddlywinks by arvindn · · Score: 1

    There is a serious game (with tournaments and all) which is somewhat similar to this. It's called tiddlywinks

    1. Re:Tiddlywinks by mink · · Score: 1

      I remember that as a kid here in america. dunno if we still have it, kids these days...

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  12. Apparently it's all in the wrist action... by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 4, Funny

    So no problem for most geeks then...

    1. Re:Apparently it's all in the wrist action... by sc00p18 · · Score: 1

      Dude, who taught you how to type? You're really not supposed to move your wrists.

    2. Re:Apparently it's all in the wrist action... by Moofie · · Score: 0

      Hey, um, skippy, I don't think he was talking about typing.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  13. Is that.... by Highwayman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is that Hans Blix in the article's photo? I long have expected the UK to be in possession of a proscribed pancake making machine able of launching a pancake in excess of 150km. In other news, Rumsfeld demands accounting for 1.5 tons of missing pancake batter.

    1. Re:Is that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually is a MP. The British parliament has a pancake race every year for charity.

  14. Hah! What about the wrist? by the+bluebrain · · Score: 0, Funny

    ... is what I want to know.
    These guys wouldn't know their elbows from their asses, the way it sounds. "It's all in the wrist" is a rule well-known to tennis players, golfers, and come to think of it, other, uh ... sportsmen. Um.

    I'll stop my rant there, I think.

    --
    yes, we have no bananas
  15. BBC doesn't understand it by panurge · · Score: 4, Informative
    The BBC quotes a garbled version of the equation (haven't they got an equation setter? cheapskates) but clearly don't understand what it means.

    AFAIUI it simply means that the pancake needs to spin at such a rate that it will flip 180 degrees between leaving the pan and returning. Given that it will not fall back flat unless the flip is 180n degrees, n integral, this is pretty blindingly obvious.

    Unfortunately, the equation is just that and doesn't tell you how to achieve flip rate nirvana. So here is my guide:

    • First, use a nonstick pan with a gently sloping edge.
    • Second, use just enough oil to ensure the crepe can slide around smoothly.
    • Third, in order to flip, start by lowering the far edge of the pan so the crepe starts to slide towards the edge.
    • Then, as the crepe reaches the edge, rotate the elbow upwards so that the crepe slides off the edge in an upward direction. This provides the spin. The speed doesn't need to be too high. As the crepe flips over, catch it with the pan horizontal.
    • Start with small crepes and build up.
    • When I was first shown this technique in a creperie in Normandy, by the end of the evening I could flip them up to ceiling height and still recover them.
    Creperies that use precooked crepes made on industrial conveyor belts are of course beyond the pale.
    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:BBC doesn't understand it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Given that it will not fall back flat unless the flip is 180n degrees, n integral, this is pretty blindingly obvious.

      ... I would further suggest that n is odd, or your guests will probably not be asking for a second round.

    2. Re:BBC doesn't understand it by panurge · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the correction. It's nice to know there is intelligent life out there.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    3. Re:BBC doesn't understand it by Fembot · · Score: 1

      probably best to keep it at 1 unless you happen to be some sort of expert juggler.....oo that gives me an idea i wonder if it would be possible to toss 2 pancakes simultaniously AND swap which pan they were in. BRB :P

    4. Re:BBC doesn't understand it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was first shown this technique in a creperie in Normandy, by the end of the evening I could flip them up to ceiling height and still recover them. :confused: Crepes are not flipped like this though. They are cooked on a fixed plate and turned with a palette knife type device.

      As far as pancakes go BTW the time to flip is when the bubbles that form in the batter start to open (burst would be too strong a term) on the uncooked side. The flipping should either be so well rehearsed that it appears instantaneous or amateurish (but successful) so it looks like natural skill - being clumsy with a standard technique will just make it look like you have read up on how to flip pancakes on the interweb but are still such a spanner that you can't quite get it right.

    5. Re:BBC doesn't understand it by Tomster · · Score: 1
      When I was first shown this technique in a creperie in Normandy, by the end of the evening I could flip them up to ceiling height and still recover them occasionally.

      Minor correction. :)

      -Thomas

    6. Re:BBC doesn't understand it by the_hose · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, you can use a specialty cooking surface and that thin spatula-knife-widget-thing, but that would have to be a more recent invetion. You don't need to spend 300 bux at williams-sonoma on some special "crepe pan" device, just learn how to flip them. It's not hard.

      FWIW, Jacques Peppin's "La Technique" gives a recipie that contains enough butter to obviate the need for greasing the pan and also suggests banging the pan on the counter (w/ potholder to buffer!) thus loosening the pancake prior to The Flip.

  16. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think you meant:

    In Heaven, the police are British, the lovers are Italian, the cooks are French, the engineers are German, and it's all organized by the Swiss.

    In Hell, the police are German, the lovers are Swiss, the cooks are British, the engineers are French, and it's all organized by the Italians.

    1. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In america, the police are Irish, the lovers are hispanic, the cooks are italian, the engineers are japanese and it's all organized by the devil.

    2. Re:Actually... by shemsvoice · · Score: 1

      Well, since the devil is a figment of your imagination, I would say "In America, the police are irish, the lovers are hispanic, the cooks are italian, the engineers are engineers are japanese and it's all organized by no one." I kinda like that better.

    3. Re:Actually... by krugg234 · · Score: 1

      Actually, you forgot part of it: In Heaven, the bankers are Belgian and the lovers are Spanish. In Hell, the bankers are Spanish and the lovers are Belgian.

  17. Amazing Brits... by jkrise · · Score: 1, Troll

    They do research on pancakes, moon mining, curry (chicken tikka masala is the national dish) and other inane "foreign" things. But when it comes to making an Operating System or even choosing one for their schools, they simply turn to America and say, "Give us Microsoft". Amazing.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Amazing Brits... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ever heard of RISC OS It's been around for about ten years now. It was used widely in schools (until Blair started getting chummy with a certain Mr Gates) on British designed hardware by Acorn. Now-a-days the Brits contribute a lot to the open source community. Alan Cox and Russell King are two notable personalities.

      I for one definitely don't say give me microsoft and probably use more european software than american software. My hardware is mainly Taiwanese, Korean or Japanese except for the SGIs. The US is definitely not the fount of all knowledge and technology.

    2. Re:Amazing Brits... by JimPooley · · Score: 2, Informative

      But when it comes to making an Operating System or even choosing one for their schools, they simply turn to America and say, "Give us Microsoft". Amazing.

      It was not always the way. After all, business computing began here with the Lyons Electronic Office, and in the 80's schools used the BBC Micro, developed by Acorn in Cambridge.

      The rot didn't set in until the 90s, and a once thriving British computer industry went down the pan. For shame.

      I blame the government. It doesn't help when we have a PM keen to lick arse, whether that arse be Bill Gates' or Dubya Bush's.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    3. Re:Amazing Brits... by freddled · · Score: 5, Funny

      We are having a rest after inventing democracy (o/s for civilisation), the English language (o/s for culture and arguably thinking), Football (conflict resolution and war emulation) and Cricket (cultural add-on for massively-scalar beer drinking in the park).

    4. Re:Amazing Brits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except democracy was invented in Greece, football virtually everywhere but Fifa was what - codified the rules first in Belgium.

      and cricket? shock horror, cricket was invented by the French.

    5. Re:Amazing Brits... by zoydoid · · Score: 0

      but the brits did invent baseball

    6. Re:Amazing Brits... by Atrahasis · · Score: 1

      10 years? By 10 years ago, RISCOS 3 was out. The RISCPC has been around for 8(?) years (first riscpc600's had RISCOS3.5). RISCOS started out on the A3xx series (as far as I can remember, we're going back to waaaaay back in the dim and distant past). I used Acorns for 15 years and never had one crash (well, sometimes, but that was due to flaky 3rd party software rather than OS stability issues). There's something to be said for a firmware OS.

    7. Re:Amazing Brits... by khakipuce · · Score: 1
      Why were the Brits never any good at building computer hardware?

      They couldn't figure out how to make it leak oil.

      --
      Art is the mathematics of emotion
    8. Re:Amazing Brits... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      You're completely right of course. I must be getting old because I had a RISC OS 2.1 machine back in 1989. As for Acorn machines, I got my first one in 1983. My venerable Beeb is 20 years old this year.

    9. Re:Amazing Brits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democracy was invented in Greece. I'm sure you know this, but you hope noone else does.

    10. Re:Amazing Brits... by Fembot · · Score: 0

      Actualy if my (sketchy) knowledge of history serves me correctly democracy took of in Britan folliwng the victory of oliver cromwell's ROundheads over Charles's caviliers in the english civil war, long before Columbus had gone off looking for a shortcut to india

    11. Re:Amazing Brits... by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 2, Informative

      And parlimentary democracy was instituted in the 13th Century with the signing of the Magna Carta. By the 17th Century we'd had a civil war during which the King was removed from power and only parliment ruled the country. So Britain was a democracy at least a century before the American Revolution

    12. Re:Amazing Brits... by wagemonkey · · Score: 0

      America isn't a democracy, it's a republic - ask Gore.

    13. Re:Amazing Brits... by rjw57 · · Score: 1

      Actually the English civil war (Charlie and Oliver, etc) was 200 years _after_ Columbus.

      --
      Rich
    14. Re:Amazing Brits... by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      And parlimentary democracy was instituted in the 13th Century with the signing of the Magna Carta.

      Ha! I think not. The Magna Carta established that the King's power was not supreme, but he was still a hell of a lot more powerful than the parliament. The House of Lords was the only one that mattered, and members of parliament were not elected democratically anyway. The idea of the Magna Carta as the beginning of British democracy was a piece of propaganda spread centuries later (I believe it was done by the Whigs, though I can't remember for certain).

      By the 17th Century we'd had a civil war during which the King was removed from power and only parliment ruled the country.

      Again, untrue. Lord Oliver Cromwell set himself up as military dictator. He did TRY to make England into a democracy, of sorts, but he never liked the people who were elected, so he'd just send them all home and call for new elections. In reality, Cromwell had more power than the monarchs he'd replaced. The one useful thing that did come out of the whole situation was that the House of Commons started to equal or even dominate the House of Lords in power for the first time.

      The evolution of democracy in Britain was a slow process, and I'm not sure one could really peg down a date and say "this was the effective end of the monachy's power." If I were to choose a period though, it certainly would not be before 1800.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    15. Re:Amazing Brits... by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Informative
      inventing democracy

      I think the Athenians have prior art. You can have credit for the court system, with seperate judge, jury, and executioner, though. That, in my opinion, is as or more important.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    16. Re:Amazing Brits... by Malc · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Oliver Cromwell partly failed because he was basically a replacement monarch under a different name, which was what the country had just had a bitter war over. We also have Oliver Cromwell to thank for the continuing resentment of many Irish people, [no] thanks to his brutal repression which resulted in 40% of them being butchered. It's no consolation to the Irish, but he was brutal to the English too.

      The evolution of democracy in Britain has gone hand in hand with the rise of the "supremacy of Parliament", one of the key points of the British constitution. I personally think that the civil war and beheading of King Charles were critical to this, even if it just planted seeds of ideas that took a long to germinate. I don't think the end of great power of the monarchy came until the start of Queen Victoria's reign - if she'd ruled like her predecessor, Britian might be a republic today rather than constitutional monarchy.

      Aside: I've always liked the music and stage shows of the Levellers and New Model Army. It's only in recent years that I've come to realise the significance of their names and the relationship to their social attitudes. Just learning about these "pop" bands is like a great civil war era history lesson that the education system failed to give me.

    17. Re:Amazing Brits... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "rounders", you insensitive clod!

    18. Re:Amazing Brits... by Greedo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Only on Slashdot can a post on linguistic differences about the term "pancakes" result in an anti-Microsoft reply within two posts.

      There should be a Six Degrees of Slashdot test: how many posts does it take to turn a discussion into one about operating systems, beowulf clusters, or the RIAA.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    19. Re:Amazing Brits... by mythr · · Score: 1

      One... Two... Three. *crunch*. Three!
      (The world may never know.)

  18. now that we know the formula.... by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    A physics grad student in the UK has come up with the mathematical formula ...... The BBC has the details."

    Sure, knowing the formula is exactly the same things as being able to do is, but didn't anyone else notice that they didn't actually give this "formula" that they claim is so important?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:now that we know the formula.... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      umm yes they did. just wasn't written in matheamatical notation...

      "The angular velocity of the object equals the square root of Pi, times the gravity divided by the distance the pancake is from the elbow times four - that is how to get the pancake back in the pan. " and...
      "The 21-year-old explained the formula: "'W' is the angular velocity of the pancake, 'g' represents gravity and 'r' is the distance from the pivot - the elbow - to the centre of the pancake"

      so w=sqrt(pi)g/4r

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    2. Re:now that we know the formula.... by slimak · · Score: 1

      As i'm sure many others noticed, this amazing formula neglects any movement of the wrist and shoulder.

    3. Re:now that we know the formula.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, to maintain correct dimensions:

      w=sqrt(pi*g/4r)
      since g is in m/s^2, and r is in m...thus the new formula gives the answer in 1/s which is the angular velocity in Hz.

    4. Re:now that we know the formula.... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Its to do with angular moemntum - i/.e rotation - so that you can (theoretically) flip the pancake so it rotates exactly through an odd multiple of 180 degrees when it hits the pan. The angular momentum isnt related to the flipping force - but yes, you do also need to know how hard to flip.

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  19. Hmmm. by nurightshu · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't that be, "A pancake IN SOVIET RUSSIA..."? :)

    --
    They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    1. Re:Hmmm. by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

      No, Soviet Russia was INSIDE the pancake.

      WE ATE THEM.

      *I'm from US

    2. Re:Hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... NO! You have it all wrong.

      That was only a peice of banana.

  20. Never ending pancakes by ufoman · · Score: 0

    Will IHOP use this new technology?

    --
    The following statement is false.
    The previous statement is true.
    Welcome to my world.
  21. Taking as someone who can't flip by rf0 · · Score: 1

    On shorve Tuesday I did try my best to flip pancakes the traditional way I found that I can't flip. What I really needed was something like the JML all american pancake maker. Bascially a frying pan with a lid that you can turn over. Now that would be cool

    Rus
    - Who really needs his first cup of coffee -

    1. Re:Taking as someone who can't flip by satterth · · Score: 1

      It has already been done... perfect_pancake

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  22. MIT did it first ... by droopycom · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...although less spectacular

    http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/1995/40409.html

    1. Re:MIT did it first ... by radiotalent · · Score: 1

      Whew! We've got prior art on this. Can you imagine trying to proving to the BSA (Breakfast Systems Alliance) that you've got a license to flip pancakes perfectly.

      At least there's always Lucky Charms.

    2. Re:MIT did it first ... by mink · · Score: 1

      The BSA is always after me Lucky Charms.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  23. Are Americans fat? by fantomas · · Score: 1

    ok this is geekland! Somebody provide a reference rather than "your nation stinks more than my nation!" (oh ok it is /. I spose).


    Come on then, somebody dig up stats, are the good people of the US the fattest in the world? or at least how do they compare with UK, and Oz, and say the French and Italians, and err, I dunno, some other non Western country, Japan? Egypt?


    I'd love to know where the USA is on an international scale, say of % of inhabitants overweight...

    1. Re:Are Americans fat? by Jus+ad+Bellum · · Score: 1

      Well last when I was in Vegas for a Bach. Party the line up for the Champagne (wonder if they still promote this right now with the anti-French attitude?) Buffet wasn't quite a shining example of Americain Physical Education class. Not that all Americain people are overweight. But I think that being one of the most affluent contries in the world lends itself to overindulgence.

      Here are some stats.

      http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats /obese/obse99.htm

    2. Re:Are Americans fat? by mumkin · · Score: 1
      Well, to support Elvis' assertion that the Brits aren't exactly starving themselves, Auntie Beeb had this to say a few days ago:

      In the UK, the number of men considered obese has more than doubled from 8% in the 1980s to 17% now, while the rate for women has soared from 9% to 21%.

      The situation is mirrored among children with nearly one in five youngsters in England overweight.
  24. Once by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I tried flipping a pancake, Once.

    The ensuing mess encouraged me not to try it again. (Nothing ruins the meal more than cleaning up a half-cooked pancake off the floor)

    If these guys can come up with some sort of mess free "practice pancake" kit with detailed instructions that can be read without a degree in math. I would be very interested.

    1. Re:Once by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > If these guys can come up with some sort of mess free "practice pancake" kit with detailed instructions that can be read without a degree in math. I would be very interested.

      1) Try it over the sink.
      2) Flip it with a spatula, and once both sides of the pancake are cooked, you can get 4-5 practice flips out of it before you screw up badly enough to break the pancake.
      3) Repeat with next pancake.
      4) Apply butter, syrup, whatever you like to the big heaping plate of pancake frags, nuke in microwave for 30 seconds. Chow time!

    2. Re:Once by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      Thank you, That was the kindest reply I have found yet on /. I really hope there are more people that are willing to be as positive as you on this forum. I have constantly run into a wall of hate and mod the motherfu*kers down because they don't know any better.

      You a are a breath of fresh air. You are willing to teach rather than drag somebody down into a slime pool of "getting even with the people that don't know"

      I really appreciate this.

      I will try your suggestion at the first chance I get.

      Scott

      PS. You are also my first "Friend" on /.

      I hope I am worthy.

    3. Re:Once by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > I will try your suggestion at the first chance I get.
      >
      > PS.
      >You are also my first "Friend" on /.

      Glad I could help, and I appreciate the kind sentiment.

      But if you think that's gonna encourage me to confirm or deny whether my method of learning pancake-flipping was borne out of "learning it the hard way, repeatedly, and in messy fashion, and almost starting a fire once or twice", you're nuts :)

      Happy pancaking!

  25. re: story by prell · · Score: 2, Funny

    if I ever get another story rejected by slashdot, I'll shoot myself

  26. Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 'right' way?

    Like everything else, the right way isn't defined by some sort of educational institution.

    Does your method produce edible and tasty omlettes and pancakes?

    Then it's the right way, and damned the line cooks.

  27. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's not the oversized portions.

    It's the fact that we're lazy pigs, waddling in our own mess. (Yeah, I'm an American, I'm allowed to say that.)

    We sit at desk jobs from nine to five, then drive three blocks home from work in an SUV, and sit on the couch, or in front of the computer. Finally, we go directly to bed. Do not pass Exercise Bike. Do not burn 200 calories.

  28. ob micro$oft connection by limbop · · Score: 1, Funny

    Apparently this guy isn't the only one interested in pancake flipping. Take a look at this paper entitled "Bounds for sorting by prefix reversal" (AKA Pancake flipping problem) co-published by one William H. Gates...

  29. Mod up parent by MegaFur · · Score: 1
    I think it's funny and insightful--in a Discordian kind of way.

    fnord

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  30. Re:Amazing Brits... BCPL by Burb · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh yes, and if you look in your history books you'll find that C owes a lot to a certain language called BCPL developed by Martin Richards at Cambridge University in the 60's ...

    --

  31. Practical Physics 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How to help people to kill other people. Nothing personal, you understand. This is just for the money.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,9084 26 ,00.html

  32. err by Geaty · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The angular velocity of the object equals the square root of Pi, times the gravity divided by the distance the pancake is from the elbow times four

    hmm . . . I notice that this formula does not factor in mass of the pancake. this makes me wonder, being not-so-smart in physics, would this formula apply for any size pancake?? and how about objects other than pancakes? could I flip say, a thanksgiving turkey and still have it land perfectly in the pan, using this formula??

    and why do Scots like cheese in their pancakes?? don't they know the proper way to do anything is the American way, i.e. sugar and syrup??

    Bored and tired minds want to know!!

    --
    All I ever wanted was an honest week's pay for an honest day's work.
    1. Re:err by theperplepigg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Odd, I thought the american way was butter and syrup? Regardless, I'm american, and while I once loved syrup on my pancakes, I now prefer just plain butter/margarine (syrup occasionally, of course). Don't think I ever used sugar and syrup, though. Just seems like overkill to me.

      --paul

      --
      -- Every time you kill a kitten, God masturbates.
    2. Re:err by gilroy · · Score: 3, Informative
      Blockquoth the poster:

      hmm . . . I notice that this formula does not factor in mass of the pancake. this makes me wonder, being not-so-smart in physics, would this formula apply for any size pancake??

      In problems driven solely by gravity, the mass typically drops out. Thank you, Equivalence Principle.

      and how about objects other than pancakes? could I flip say, a thanksgiving turkey and still have it land perfectly in the pan, using this formula?

      A pancake is a nicely simple and symmetric object. Indeed, the symmetry means that whenever you flip it, you're doing so about a stable axis. Other shapes, not so nice... your turkey might tumble wildly. Also, while the mass drops out of the angular velocity, it does not drop out of the formula for the needed force -- and a turkey tends to be quite a bit more massive than a crepe.
    3. Re:err by scrawny · · Score: 1

      the mass doesn't matter, since the vertical motion is directly dependent on your speed (calculated angular velocity) and simple gravity. horizontal velocity is negligible and would be constant for the duration of the flip anyway.

      The Real Problems:

      1. with a pancake larger than the pan, the area outside the pan does not accelerate with the pan and can adversely affect the angular velocity at time of release.

      2. with the calculation of angular velocity in this example, the change in location of the elbow (and thus the upper arm from shoulder) is neglected. try even tossing a pen with your elbow still, as on a desk. not bloody likely.

      3. much like the elbow, but more importantly, the wrist is not locked and creates much greater angular momentum than the measure and calculation they use here.

      we have theory and practice. pancakes don't need a theory.

    4. Re:err by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      american way?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!

      Try Canadien! sirop de MAPLE!!! (yes... western Canadian, BAD FRENCH) Syrop and butter is Canadian (yes! Quebec is part of Canada... silly french canadiEn types) not american.

      to quote a certain MP: "damn americans! I hate the bastards!"

    5. Re:err by mink · · Score: 1

      Yah, that whole American Maple Tree Act of 1846 really screwed up breakfast down here. Had we not dug up and sent all maple type trees north of the border, we would not be so dependant on imported syrups.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    6. Re:err by Phronesis · · Score: 1
      the mass drops out of the angular velocity

      Mass only drops out in a vacuum. In air, while the pancake is aloft, you have

      angular acceleration = torque / moment of inertia
      Torque comes from air resistance and can be quite significant for a pancake weighing a few grams with a surface area of about 300 square centimeters.
  33. Waddayamean, Troll!?!?! by Omni-Cognate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is one of the least trollish comments I've read on this thread (though that isn't saying much). This guy just described my life spot on. I'm neither American nor fat, but in both cases I can only thank my parents. There but for the grace of god go I.

    Considering this is an article about one of the many traditional annual face-stuffing days westerners celebrate, it's hardly trolling to point out how many people have, or think they have, no time to get any excercise.

    Stressed-out, over-fed, under-excercised = early death. The solution is not to diet (=less food, but more stress and still no excercise), but to get plenty of excercise (helps with stress, and you can eat all you like because your body turns it into muscle or motion rather than fat).

    In my final year at university, I quit smoking and started swimming just under a mile four times a week. It was the best six months of my life - I was relaxed, I had plenty of energy, muscles even started appearing! Then the exams came along, followed by life as a code-monkey, and here I am smoking, lazy, stressed and eating like a vacuum cleaner. Time to resurrect that lapsed gym membership, I think.

    --

    "The Milliard Gargantubrain? A mere abacus - mention it not."

  34. Re: In England we're real tossers by Amroarer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, where I come from, we don't use no spatulas to toss pancakes... (Although some more cautious people do slip them out of the pan onto a plate, then drop them back in upside down.) English pancakes are so wide and thin that a spatula's likely to just tear them. Instead you have to use the showing-off-method.

    First you make a circular movement with the pan to ensure that the pancake hasn't stuck and overcome static friction.

    Then you tilt the end of the pan down slightly and make a short, sharp inward movement, to get the pancake sliding outwards.

    Then you sharply flick the pan up, so that the pancake goes between one and two feet in the air (more if you're feeling cocky) and also spins enough that it lands in the pan the other way up.

    I'll be very impressed if they invent a machine which can repeatably toss pancakes. There are an awful lot of variables, which he seems to ignore. But then he is a physicist, not an engineer. ;-)

  35. This is what Brits have to say about it by Nemosoft+Unv. · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I asked a (native) British collegue about it, and this was his reply:

    Ahh the wonders of pancacke day or as the French call it Mardi Gras Fat tuesday. This is the day before the start of Lent (crazy Christian starvation festival, preparing mind and body for the Easter celebrations etc). Typically people used to use up all their fatty things on this day such as butter, eggs and lard etc, coz it was not the done thing to be eating lard cakes when everybody else was eating celery.

    Thus the pancake tradition started. Of course, all the religous nonsense has largely disappeared but the pancakes remain in British Culture.

    As far as the tossing equation goes, thats just the work of a whacked out English ale swilling academics, and is an essential part of British inventiveness and ingenuity. (You can't make great discoveries all of the time)

    Hope that helps and thank you for your interest in Britain.

    :-)

    --
    "Fix it? It has been disintegrated, by definition it cannot be fixed!" - Gru in Despicable Me.
    1. Re:This is what Brits have to say about it by babbage · · Score: 2, Funny
      So let me get this straight -- while the US Gulf Coast from Mobile through New Orleans and west is celebrating the drunken debauchery of Mardi Gras, and while Rio de Janerio is celebrating the even more wild debauchery of Carnival ...the English are observing "let's eat pancakes day"? How dreadfully boring.

      No wonder our ancestors emigrated :-)

    2. Re:This is what Brits have to say about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pancake Day is still observed in Canada today, and presumably some other Commonwealth countries as well. I've always understood it to be a French-Canadian custom, as its typically more of a 'crepe day' here than anything else. (and French Catholics are probably some of the last people left on earth who still observe Lent in any meaningful way). Didn't realize there were Brit roots there too.

  36. Okaaaaaay, by DongleFondle · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do believe it is time that someone introduced Europe to the concept of the 'spatula'. We sort a solved this whole pancakes on the floor dilehma a looooooooong time ago . . .
    You know what? While we're at it, let's give China forks and spoons.

    1. Re:Okaaaaaay, by sonatinas · · Score: 1, Insightful

      HEY! I buy a bag of cheetos and eat them with chopsticks (living in China). It is the best way to eat a bag without getting your laptop keyboard , or anything, dirty with deadly cheeto residue.

    2. Re:Okaaaaaay, by panurge · · Score: 1

      You need to understand the difference between the US pancake ( CD-rom size only thicker) and the European crepe-type pancake (up to LP size, 30cm diameter, and beyond.) Even if you had a spatula large enough, you would struggle to get it under the crepe without tearing out the middle. Strange as it may seem, there is actually often reason and logic behind what foreigners do.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    3. Re:Okaaaaaay, by kurosawdust · · Score: 1, Funny

      You know what? While we're at it, let's give China forks and spoons. Perhaps we can work out an international trade agreement where they give us the metric system in return...

    4. Re:Okaaaaaay, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people say Americans like everything bigger. Would Europe be interested in our pancake miniaturization technology then? This reminds me of the story (urban legend?) of Sony reps proposing that a CD be the size of an LP and being stunned when showed them their prototype, the size we know today.

    5. Re:Okaaaaaay, by Zerakith · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Pancakes tend to be larger over here then id assume, as normally they're too big and would just torn by a spatula!

    6. Re:Okaaaaaay, by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      canada has been sneaking that south for the last decade, however americans have only replied thats theres two quarts in a hogs hind and eleventeen paces in a stride...

      They cant seem to get the system where everything is a factor of 10 of everything else...

      why remember 1m=10decimeters=100centimeters=1000millimeters when you can remember 1 yard = 1239243 paces = 13212 inches = 12314329324230320932093093 wierd-named-things.

      silly americans! math is for foreigners! *trix commercial with +,=,-,% signs going across the screen*

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    7. Re:Okaaaaaay, by Nameles · · Score: 1

      It's because we grew up with knowing what an inch was and a foot was in relation to everything else. We knew how much a cup was, and how hot 80F was. Now when we grow up, saying that i'm 200cm tall is vastly different than saying I'm 6ft tall (not going for an equal amount), and saying "Holy shit! It's 27C out! It's fucking hot!" is different than saying "Damn, I'm gonna die in the 100F heat!"

    8. Re:Okaaaaaay, by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      Of course I am just teasing. I live in Canada, grew up with the metric system, but I know im 5'9" and not how many centimeters...I know I weigh 165 or so pounds but no idea of kg's...and my dad measures everything with the imperial system because his supplies and reference books both come from the US. However, I talk about weather in 'C, and use the metric system for most things. Occasionally I drive the number of miles per hour the speed limit is listed in kilometers per hour, but just when I am in a hurry...

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    9. Re:Okaaaaaay, by DuSTman31 · · Score: 1

      We have spatulas. But what americans seem to call spatulas we call a "fish slice".

  37. This needs more salt errr...variables by Aropax20 · · Score: 1, Funny
    Did these guys code up a VirtualFrypan (better trademark that before Apple can) and screw around with a few simple variables or something?

    I mean, don't you have to factor in the surface of the frypan? What about teflon versus some tatty old iron pan? Did they butter or oil it first and if so, how much?

    What about the consistency of the batter and the right moment at which to flip it? I'm no Pancake Scientist but I bet a realllllly runny pancake is more likely to splatter the ceiling than one with the fluid dynamics of week-old oatmeal

    A "conundrum that has taxed pancake flippers since the dawn" (dawn of time, or yesterday morning?) needs a rigid set of controls in place!

    Maybe they need to determine the perfect recipe before firing up that stove?

    oh well, back to the chopping board...

  38. Off topic but... by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know this is really off topic, but it is on, if the topic is "reasonibly absurd science". In Nature last December, they decided to publish a short note about an Austrailian matehmatician's work on The Best Way To Lace Your Shoelaces

    No joke.

    1. Re:Off topic but... by Etosoerc · · Score: 1

      It was already posted here

      --

      "What's in the public interest, isn't what the public is interested in" - Terry Pratchett
  39. What details? by upper · · Score: 1

    BBC has something -- color commentary might be the best description. But to say that the linked BBC article has the details is just plain wrong.

  40. What my parents said is true... by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...You really do need to use math every day.

    Mmmmmm......

    --
    Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
  41. One problem by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 0

    He didn't calculate exactly how much butter and Canadian Maple Syrup to put on these pancakes when they have been flipped so exactingly. :D

    *Hmm it's 5am here where I type this, maybe I should go make some 'cakes for breakfast!*

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
  42. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Lift and its misconceptions were discussed in an AvWeb article (I was unable to locate the original article; the link is a Google cache).

    And, as a pilot, I suggest that most people don't have a clue how a plane flies until they learn how to fly one -- even if they're familiar with the underlying physics. I spent several months reading about aircraft operation and theory before starting flying lessons. I could recite entire sections of the Aircraft Flying Handbook from memory, but my first hour of actual flight proved how little I knew.

  43. Amazing Americans... by pytheron · · Score: 2

    Every day they sit and worship a device invented by John Logie Baird, a Brit.

    --
    "I am not bound to please thee with my answers" [William Shakespeare]
    1. Re:Amazing Americans... by Fembot · · Score: 1

      and dont forget the telephone the telephone. (Alexander Graham Bell was a brit)

    2. Re:Amazing Americans... by Pastor+Fluff · · Score: 2, Funny

      So we have the brits to blame for "Can you hear me now?"

      --
      Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble... can't we just go to Starbuck's for coffee?
    3. Re:Amazing Americans... by deal · · Score: 1

      We actually have old stock papers for Baird Telivision Company. Maybe one day we'll check to see if they're worth the paper they're written on. In the meantime, they're nice to have around for historic nostalgia, anyway.

  44. Flipping the pan by PimpNinjaWannaBee · · Score: 0

    It's actually easier (unless you have a very heavy pan, or geeky small /.-muscels) to flip the entire pan _with_ the pancake still innit.

  45. Spatula? by Inda · · Score: 1

    Of course we have spatulas. How else do you think we scrape the ice off our cars on cold winter mornings?

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:Spatula? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was what credit cards were for...

  46. Wierd Al already told us by pacc · · Score: 1

    But I'm not sure that we are convinced enough to make Spatula City successfull in Europe.

    If you still think we should use spatulas, why don't you send a Virtual Spatula to prove your case.

  47. You're wasting eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    100-200 wasted eggs

    You shouldn't use eggs for 95% of the training. Put a piece of toast in the pan and flip it until it lands gently. Also with good technique for eggs (over and omlettes), the first part out of the pan is coming back into about the middle of the pan before last part has left the pan. This avoids the impact onto the pan that can cause yolks to break and splatter of butter/margarine/etc.

    A former line cook and now a software engineer.

    1. Re:You're wasting eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you really want to get good at flipping things using only the pan, use uncooked rice. if you can cleanly flip uncooked rice without getting it all over, you can flip anything.

    2. Re:You're wasting eggs by mink · · Score: 1

      Rice... Thats easy.
      Try live cats (do not aply cat to heat) for the ultimate challange.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  48. Missing formula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think this is a case of some one with lots of scientific knowledge, but absolutely no practical knowledge. What happens if I like my pancakes dense and oaty, or light and fluffy. The amount of water/milk/buttermilk will vary depending on a person's taste. As as others have mentioned, a pancake is different depending on who you ask. Latke's are potatoe pancakes, but they behave very differently than crepes.


    Maybe these scientists would have been better off taking a couple classes in cooking and spending time with their families having dinner parties.

  49. Anonymous coward has an email address? by ghamerly · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ah hah! Now we know who has been posting as AC for all these years!

  50. Lemon And Sugar? Jam? Stupid Britons by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows the best, and really the only way to eat a pancake is with maple syrup. And I'm talkin' pure 100% straight from a little indie sugar shack in Quebec kind of maple syrup. None of that store bought junk that's only 15%(sometimes 0%) maple syrup. What do they think we are? 15% kids? We want 100% syrup for 100% kids

    And That's My 2 Cents, Eh!

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  51. Something going wrong.... by isa-kuruption · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is something seriously wrong with the education system when a grad student gets a masters in physics for writing a thesis on flipping a pancake.

    What's next? Maybe, for his doctoral thesis, he should write a formula for the proper amount of syrup to be used based on it's rate of obsorbtion by the pancake.

    1. Re:Something going wrong.... by DenOfEarth · · Score: 1
      What's next? Maybe, for his doctoral thesis, he should write a formula for the proper amount of syrup to be used based on it's rate of obsorbtion by the pancake.

      As long as he includes the effects of the butter on the pancake, I'd support that doctorate

    2. Re:Something going wrong.... by mink · · Score: 1

      A suficiently buttered american pancake is impervious to syrup.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  52. The only 'practical' physics I need by jhawkins · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The only thing that's really important to know (if you don't already) is- The angle of the dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of the meat.

    huh huh.... yeah that was cool.

  53. Lard! Eat this Shit and DIE! by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...but the english tend to use gallons of lard when cooking at home...

    I'm English and (unsurprisingly, as I live in England) so are most of the people that I know. There isn't any lard in my house. Or, from what I've seen when eating at friends' houses, anywhere else.

    The supermarket aisles devote about 50 times more space to butters and margarines than they do to lard, so that suggests that demand for lard isn't exactly huge.

    Perhaps, like all Frenchmen having smelly breath or all Australians being called Bruce, this is one of another one of those urban myths that you Americans have bought into?

    (BTW, "Lard! Eat this Shit and DIE!" is a reference to the late, great, Bill Hicks. Great comedian. Great loss.)

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Lard! Eat this Shit and DIE! by mink · · Score: 1

      I thought the Bruce thing was British.
      I will have to write a letter to one MR. G. Chapman about this sillyness;-)

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  54. If only we knew about this two days ago! by scoco · · Score: 1

    We just missed International Pancake day! This would have been great for the race!

  55. The Future We Were Promised by wossName · · Score: 1

    His theoretical work laid the groundwork for students designing a pancake-tossing machine, which could one day become a feature in every home.

    Or it makes it into the next edition of this.

    --
    Someone is wrong on the Internet!
  56. Finally!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am happy to see that someone has finally put mathematics to good use! This is a helluvalot better than perfecting atomic bomb efficiency.

  57. Re: In England we're real tossers by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'll be very impressed if they invent a machine which can repeatably toss pancakes. There are an awful lot of variables, which he seems to ignore. But then he is a physicist, not an engineer. ;-)

    Yeah, but that means he will be more accurate by roughly 5% because he won't be assuming that pi is 'nearly' 3 ;-)

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  58. had to say it... by Rcknight · · Score: 1

    thats some flippin impressive maths!
    [DUCKS] :p

  59. HGG by tomzyk · · Score: 0
    If you butter both sides, will it land on its edge? A better question, what if you butter the edge as well?
    or
    butter some bread and attach it to a cat, then throw it up in the air. Cats always land on their feet, but bread always lands butter side down, so the cat/bread combination will spin round and round indefinately...
    Isn't that almost the secret to flight? (Throw yourself at the ground... and miss.)
    --
    Karma: NaN
    1. Re:HGG by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > If you butter both sides, will it land on its edge? A better question, what if you butter the edge as well?
      > or
      > butter some bread and attach it to a cat, then throw it up in the air. Cats always land on their feet, but bread always lands butter side down, so the cat/bread combination will spin round and round indefinately...
      >
      >Isn't that almost the secret to flight? (Throw yourself at the ground... and miss.)

      "After about 200 feet, it doesn't matter which side of the bread the cat is stapled to."

  60. Nope, the article is wrong! by vogon+jeltz · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but the dimension of "the square root of Pi, times the gravity divided by the distance the pancake is from the elbow times four" equals the angular_acceleration_and not the angular_velocity_! Do the math ;-)

  61. Re:I'm gonna nit pick. (OT) by ThaReetLad · · Score: 0

    I've read this before and discarded it. Try this as a simple proof that this guy has missed the point. Take a sheet of normal paper, hold one edge just below your lips and blow. You will see the far end of the sheet rise up. This is without any pressure on the underside of the sheet. Now blow equally hard on the underside on the paper. You should see the paper rise but by a smaller amount. What the author of the article you quote missed was that the "sucking" force he explained as simply a difference in pressure between the upper and lower surface, is in fact the result of a partial vacuum on the upper surface caused by the innability of the air to expand fast enough. Clearly you have just proved this to be the case, as when you blew over the upper surface there was no additional pressure on the lower surface. OK technically there is no such thing as suction, just as is there is no such thing as centrigual force, but the upward force we call lift is greater than the change in momentum of the air beneath the wing. The author is correct that there is no such thing as suction, however he is wrong to suggest that the upward pressure comes from the motion of air under the wing. It comes from the expansive tendancy of air and the fact that air is a gas under pressure. Relieved of the weight of the atmosphere pressing down it will press outwards in all directions including back up under the wing, thus lifting the aircraft. It is worth noting that this effect is due to the compressibility of air, which is why aerofoils work differently to hydrofoils, as water is not compressible. One more thing, try explaining aerodynamic stall without assuming that the majority of lift is due to the shape of the upper surface.

    --
    You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  62. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't exactly say the buffet line at a vegas casino is typical america ... think about it if your in really good physical shape are you going to be pigging out at a vegas buffet?

  63. Next thing you know by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

    we'll be reading a PhD* dissertation on the physics of flipping hamburgers.

    *piled higher and deeper

    ObJoke! "I'll bet you guys are excited" said the cabbie as he drove the students to their graduation ceremony. "I know I was when I got my PhD".

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  64. Now by HotSIag · · Score: 1, Funny

    I must patent this, as I've been doing it like that for years. Though my method also involves a webcam, a bowtie and some body lotion.

  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. And they say ART is dead by MisterMook · · Score: 1

    And they say art is dead, they obviously haven't seen what concerns physics grads are having to delve into to find something that hasn't be rehashed a million times.

  67. Pancake Algebra, it actually exists... by lonedfx · · Score: 3, Informative

    Pancake Algebra

    not quite the same, but thoroughly enjoyable !

    Francis.

  68. FAT is a bad attitude & lack of respect by adzoox · · Score: 1
    I'm in good shape and go to buffets all the time. It's not what you eat and how much you eat, it's attitude and respect.

    Attitude by working it off(labor/exercise) or using dietary supplements

    Respect by this means: you show me you care for me by looking physically attractive to me; so as a bonus to our friendship, other people want to hang with us and are attracted to us in public.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  69. Think Galileo by Phronesis · · Score: 1
    Do you remember learning about something a bloke called Galileo did at the tower of Pisa? He didn't really do it, but if he did it would have been relevant to your question.

    Try dropping a pancake (crpe to Yanks) and and a melon at the same time. Which one hit the floor first? Oops. try it in a vacuum next time.

    So if you are cooking in a vacuum, the formula applies equally well to pancakes, melons, and thanksgiving turkeys.

    If you are cooking at atmospheric pressure, you will have to correct for air resistance (quite significant for a pancake).

  70. WHy???? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

    I for one LOVE splattered pancakes. They cook up so much crisper on the lower edge. In fact, I've been flipping early for years just to get this effect.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  71. Re:Lemon and sugar by Malc · · Score: 1

    What is "confectionary sugar"? Please translate in to en_GB for me. Thanks.

  72. Does anyone else see a flaw in this formula? by mark-t · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The angular velocity is, according to the formula:

    (sqrt(pi)*1g)/(d*4)

    Where g is the accelleration due to gravity and d is the distance from the elbow to the pancake.

    In addition to the rather obvious (or at least intuitive) flaw of not considering the size/mass of the pancake, this formula cannot possibly produce the value claimed. Dimensional analysis shows that it results in an answer measured in terms of radians per second squared, and angular velocity is always measured in just radians per second.

    Of course, if they *meant* to say angular accelleration, they should have said so.

    1. Re:Does anyone else see a flaw in this formula? by Redwing · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem seems to be in the interpretation of the english representation of the equation:

      The angular velocity of the object equals the square root of Pi, times the gravity divided by the distance the pancake is from the elbow times four

      You took this to be :

      (sqrt(pi)*1g)/(d*4)

      when it should be interpreted as:

      sqrt( pi*g / (d*4) )

      then you get the right units.

      --
      Raisinettes are my raison d'etre
  73. force? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, I've got my robotic arm with elbow-joint, I've got my frying pan, and I've got my crepe sitting inside. I want to know how much force I should tell the arm to use to flip the thing, but I don't see that in the equation anywhere. Is it implicit somehow in the angular velocity term? Help me build my robotic pancake-flipper!

  74. Re: In England we're real tossers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I'll be very impressed if they invent a machine which can repeatably toss pancakes. There are an awful lot of variables, which he seems to ignore. But then he is a physicist, not an engineer. ;-)


    The formula as reported by the BBC cannot possibly be correct, since it claims that angular velocity is equal to a quantity that has dimensions of time^{-2}.

  75. Re:Lemon and sugar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    icing sugar?

  76. Re:Lemon and sugar by Malc · · Score: 1

    Don't they call that "powdered sugar"?

  77. I can beat that by jefu · · Score: 1


    I know all the digits to pi in binary. But I do admit the same problem - I do get the order mixed up a bit.

  78. Re:Lemon and sugar by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    Icing sugar.

    We used to just put TONS and TONS of regular granualted sugar on the pankace and roll it up.

    No wonder I had so many cavities....

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  79. And you wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how you'ld ever use math in everyday life. Oh those crazy Brittish...

  80. Re:Lemon and sugar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not in the uk we don't. ;)

  81. Re:Lemon and sugar by Malc · · Score: 1

    I know that, I'm a Briton. I'm referring to the Americans ;)

  82. Re: In England we're real tossers by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    Heck, England is where Professor Branestawm (sorry, Amazon doesn't list any of the original books) invented the pancake making machine. As I recall, it went awry and tossed 24-inch pancakes about 30 feet away.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  83. Oh come on... by AgentTim3 · · Score: 1
    Isn't that the same as saying:

    In Soviet Russia, pancake flips YOU!

    1. Re:Oh come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In your country, AgentTim3 steals satellite TV!

      In my country, satellite TV steals AgentTim3!

  84. Done it, seen it, been there before ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    ... but please do not look at my ceiling will you?

    thanks ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  85. Stupid Fucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the cool people are still using miles, at least! Even the British are still using miles per hour! Get a clue, you dumb fucking Canadians!

    -ts

    1. Re:Stupid Fucks by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      ahh like so how many miles your mother has on her

      i guess the number is too large in kilometers.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
  86. Re: In England we're real tossers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But then he is a physicist, not an engineer. ;-)

    Assume a cylindrical pancake of uniform density...

  87. Thank you. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    - First you make a circular movement [...]
    - Then you tilt the end of the pan down slightly
    - and make a short, sharp inward movement [...]
    - Then you sharply flick the pan up
    - so that the pancake goes between one and two feet in the air [...]


    Thank you, both for the pointers and an approximation of what they formula should be rearranged to give.

    The formula expressed in the article purports to give you the angular velocity of the pancake. Perhaps useful as one step in the process of computing how to build a flipping machine, but NOT the whole story even for a machine design, and definitely not what you need for training a human.

    And the formula is clearly wrong, since g shouldn't be in it if you're going for angular velocity - unless you're solving for the angular velocity needed at launch to get the pancake back into the pan (in which case r shouldn't be there). So something in the article's description is wrong (though perhaps the original research was correct).

    What I'd like to see is a function giving the target height for the top of the pancake's arc in terms of the radius from pivot point (probably elbow) to the center of the pancake (and possibly also parameters for the mass and diameter of the pancake if air resistance is significant.

    It's a lot easier to target a particular height-of-toss than some other control parameter (such as speed), and the height will vary with the individual flipper's arm-plus-pan length.

    Since the pancake has to land back in the pan the toss has to be close to straight up, which puts the pan about horizontal at launch. There will be some small inward motion from the air resistance, because the up and down trip have the 'cake at opposite angles to the wind, which might be compensated for by outward motion from sliding on the pan during the angular swing of the launch.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  88. Oops. I take that back. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    And the formula is clearly wrong, since g shouldn't be in it if you're going for angular velocity - unless you're solving for the angular velocity needed at launch to get the pancake back into the pan (in which case r shouldn't be there).

    Oops. I take that back.

    g, r and omega should all be there to let you solve for time-of-flight from angular velocity. So rearranging should let us solve first for circumferential velocity, then for flight time, and finally for height-of-throw, giving the formulation I was after.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  89. Re: In England we're real tossers by mdalal97 · · Score: 1

    Please, that has already been done. http://www.uwstout.edu/ur/np/2000/feaauto.html

    Now getting a robot to play ping-pong (table tennis) is a real challenge. That feat, however, has already been done. See http://www.ifr.mavt.ethz.ch/photo/indrobotics/ as an example. I don't think that's the robot I remember seeing, but it is an example. Combines computer vision and robots. Also, because it is such a huge factor, the algorithms have to take the ball's spin into account.

  90. Re:Lemon and sugar by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    What is "confectionary sugar"?
    Powdered sugar as opposed to granulaged sugar.
    About the consistency of flour as opposed to table salt.
    Used to make icings and such.

  91. Re:Lemon and sugar by mink · · Score: 1

    In the US it's called powdered or confectioners sugar.
    I guess it depends on your ancestory and region of upbringing.

    For instance I eat my grits salty with cheese. A more Southern style then others from the north would eat, they enjoy them with syrup or sugar.

    Yet I take my iced tea unsweetened like most northeners, meanwhile southerners like Iced tea to be sweetened to the point of pain.
    Southern iced tea is like Thai iced tea but without the milk.

    I blame my mother for this.

    Is it the English or the French who put milk in hot tea? I ask because I have ancestors from both countrys and I enjoy it from time to time.
    Does that make Chai a India thing or was it a British creation using Indian tea?

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  92. Re:Dearest $$$$$exyGal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Don't you know?! trollburger always gets first post when he wants it.

    He hasn't missed a single one that he attempted to get. *seriously*. and there's a secret to it too. TB's told me, personally.

  93. Re:Lemon and sugar by Malc · · Score: 1

    What are grits?

    The English drink their tea with milk. I think tea with cream is revolting, and many agree ;) An Indian fella once told me they drink their tea hot with milk in India too, even in the middle of their steaming summer - it's supposed to be one of the most refreshing drinks. No sugar is added as that isn't so refreshing, and besides many of us find that revolting too!

    I don't know much about the history of tea, but a summary can be found here. The only thing I know about Chai is that it's the fancy spiced stuff in Indian restaraunts. Oh, and some friends from northern England call ordinary tea "char", which I think is related to the Indian name.

  94. The secret formula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Have no life
    2. ???
    3. First post.

  95. Re:Lemon and sugar by mink · · Score: 1

    Grits are a corn product.
    This link should explain them better then I can. However, it is from the view of southern US cooking.
    India and other countries along the more uncomfortable tempriture regions of the world tend to serve more spicy and phisicaly hot foods. They make you sweat, and when you sweat in that climate your body can ditch some heat from the evaporation of the water.
    I usually take my hot tea with honey, but I don't usually drink black teas, I drink a lot of herbal mixtures and green teas.
    Char is Chinese for tea.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  96. Derivation of the equation by Redwing · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have just had a bit of fun trying to derive the given equation. I came up with a result that is very very close.

    1) Hang-time of the pancake:
    • t=-2V/g

    2)Time for a 180 degree flip:
    • t=pi* pancakeRadius / (farEdgeVelocity-centerVelocity)

    3)Starting spin condition:
    • (farEdgeVelocity-centerVelocity)=angularVelocityAr m*pancakeRadius


    4) I can substitute equation 3 into 2 to get:
    • timeToFlip=pi* pancakeRadius/(angularVelocityArm*pancakeRadius)


    5) The pancake radius cancels out!
    • timeToFlip=pi/angularVelocityArm


    6)Then, I set the two times equal to eachother, because we are looking for the time to flip to be exactly the hang-time:
    • pi/angularVelocityArm=-2V/g


    7) Solve for angular velocity...
    • angularVelocityArm=pi*g/(-2V)


    8) The condition at Launch is :
    • angularVelocityArm=V / armRadius


    9) So, by 7 and 8, (substituting V)..
    • angularVelocityArm=pi*g/(-2* armRadius* angularVelocityArm)


    10) which is the same as ..
    • angularVelocityArm = sqrt ( pi*g/ (-2* armRadius) )


    This result is just a clean factor of two off from the article. I'm very suprised that I can put together enough physics to derive something that is apparently so newsworthy!

    now someone help me find the mistake!

    --
    Raisinettes are my raison d'etre
    1. Re:Derivation of the equation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm giving this one to physics students tomorrow...I'll let them find the error. BTW I like the way you think!

  97. Yet another to add to my file... by guero · · Score: 1

    of British Culinary Physics. In addition to this article, learn:
    why a dunked biscuit falls apart in a cup of tea
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/462987.st m
    (Univ. of Bristol)

    why tea dribbles down a teapot's spout
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/227572. stm
    (Univ of East Anglia)

    and why bubbles rise in a pint of Guiness
    http://www.findarticles.com/m1200/19_157/ 62724340/ p1/article.jhtml
    (o.k. the researchers are Aussies, and Guiness is Irish.... both were or are part of the British Commonwealth anyways).

    Karma? mostly affected by posting to articles that are almost a day old. Danged time-zones

  98. Its about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, its about time that damn cook learned to do the math right.

  99. Well, if learned your math in school... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if learned your math in school, you wouldnt have to waste 100-200 eggs practicing how to flip eggs now, would you? All you'd have to do is learn that formula and filp it perfect everytime.