Slashdot Mirror


Earthstation 5 Claimed to be Malware

Rob from RPI writes "You may remember the announcement about a company, or program, or both called Earthstation 5 who recently 'Declared War' on the MPAA. Well guess what? Turns out that it's got code in it that allows anyone to delete any file on your computer. I suggest that you un-install as soon as possible!"

548 comments

  1. Geocites eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative


    Because the link is on geocities it's sure to be /.'d in 23 milliseconds. Here is a mirror I put up with the bin and src.
    Don't trust code from sources you don't know. I only provide these for the inevitable geocities /.ing

    1. Re:Geocites eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Whoops, I should clarify this. The link to geocities is in the posting at lists.netsys.com which is linked to from the submission. Sorry about the ambiguity.

  2. Too bad by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 1, Funny

    Too bad slashdotting them doesn't delete their files!

    In Soviet Russia, the files delete you!

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:Too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In /., YOU delete MALWARE.

  3. Not surprising by aacool · · Score: 3, Funny
    This isnt surprising - the slashdot rage/paranoia/humor when Earthstation 5 was announced was palpable.


    Just goes to show you can't trust anyone but the RIAA for f'air and balanced info-warfare:)

    1. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One man's +1 Funny is another man's -1 Troll. Which moderator's glass was half full? Look on the bright side, ./ is for optimists silly moderator!..ooh no. nope nope nope, not risking my precious "karma" on this comment...! Gotta remember to check that box this time!

    2. Re:Not surprising by chemmathguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      New tv show,

      Queer Eye for the Straight GUI

    3. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, most of the linux hippies here wouldn't even notice the quality of the GUI

    4. Re:Not surprising by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      When this was mentioned on /. originally I took a look at it. Their bold claims about what they have just seemed suspicious to me so I avoided it. They seemed to overstate what you could get on the service, and their claim of being at war seemed overblown and melodramatic so I thought something was amiss.

      Guess I was right.

    5. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god ... I thought I was the only one who thought this was an awfull piece of crap.

      I guess I am not alone.

      the bigger the bloat the more the security flaws ... just ask Microsoft .. they are after-all the king of bloat ;-)

      This proves that theory correct.

    6. Re:Not surprising by avgjoe62 · · Score: 1
      What about the terrible GUI? That's the real crime here!

      You talking about Earthstation 5 or the computers it runs on?

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

  4. Stupid stupid people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Whats worse the RIAA/MPAA or people trying to get on our good sides then backstabbing us?

    1. Re:Stupid stupid people. by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      People trying to get on your good side, then backstabbing you. By far.

      It's much better to know your enemies. I wonder if we could call this network terrorism? Someone call ASScroft!

    2. Re:Stupid stupid people. by hobbespatch · · Score: 2, Funny

      From their website... (quote) Our group is made up of many people, Jordanians, Palestinians, Indians, Americans, Russians and Israelis. Some of us are Jewish, some Christians, some Hindus and other of us are Muslim. Believe it or not, we all love and respect each other. (/quote) Yesh, now we know that was too good to be true.

      --
      Still Mud? Try www.phoenixmud.org!
    3. Re:Stupid stupid people. by dcphoenix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you know what Sun-Tsu said about knowing yourself and your enemies ( he who knows both is assured a victory ).

      In a computer's case, it's knowing as much about the program you're about to install as you can and monitoring your computer to see what's going on with it. That way, malware stands a smaller chance of screwing with your system.

    4. Re:Stupid stupid people. by yiantsbro · · Score: 1

      Why can't we just blame the whole thing on the RIAA/MPAA? It was just a nasty friend/foe tactic they employed...

    5. Re:Stupid stupid people. by hpavc · · Score: 1

      and with our new longer sentencing policy, perhaps they will be detered in the future from zapping people's computers

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    6. Re:Stupid stupid people. by smhguy · · Score: 1

      You know that quote was one of the reasons I didn't try the software (as I was curious about how well it worked). I got as far as downloading the setup file to my computer and then said "nah" and quickly dumped it...errr "recycled" it into Bill G's bin.

    7. Re:Stupid stupid people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you know what Sun-Tsu said about knowing yourself and your enemies ( he who knows both is assured a victory ).

      Actually, it goes more like:
      if you know yourself and your adversary, then you need not fear a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, then for every battle one, expect to suffer at least one loss.

      Its kind of funny because everything he said was pretty intuitive. Like: "He who spend time on slashdot get no work done, while he who spend time programming will more likely meet deadline."

    8. Re:Stupid stupid people. by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      Isn't this the bunch that is based out of a refugee camp in Palestine? Their site is located elsewhere, but the principle people are Palestinian...

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    9. Re:Stupid stupid people. by CaptainTux · · Score: 1
      Our group is made up of many people, Jordanians, Palestinians, Indians, Americans, Russians and Israelis. Some of us are Jewish, some Christians, some Hindus and other of us are Muslim. Believe it or not, we all love and respect each other.

      Kinda makes you wanna hold hands and sing "This land is my Land" huh?

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    10. Re:Stupid stupid people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is hosted in afganistan on a Commodore 64, running Linux.

  5. This is absolutely shocking. by Ygorl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Really, I mean it. From looking at their web site one would have thought they were totally legitimate!

    1. Re:This is absolutely shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more than you could expect from the home country of the RIAA and MPAA.

    2. Re:This is absolutely shocking. by DrunkenFingers · · Score: 1
      I love this part. From http://www.earthstation5.com/company.html ...

      Our group is made up of many people, Jordanians, Palestinians, Indians, Americans, Russians and Israelis. Some of us are Jewish, some Christians, some Hindus and other of us are Muslim. Believe it or not, we all love and respect each other. We all work and play together. Our families on many occasions eat at the same dinner table. We trust each other and are very close friends with each other. As a group, the most important thing in our life is our children, our families and love ones and of course our friends.

      I'd love to see it, but 1) highly unlikely (you pick the paragaph), 2) What professional company would put something like on their website.

    3. Re:This is absolutely shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What professional company would put something like on their website.

      one that is run from a Palestinian refugee camp as they point out in their declaration of war.

    4. Re:This is absolutely shocking. by djblair · · Score: 1

      "For Suggestions on ways we can improve our software, please contact us at: suggestions@earthstationv.com" Perhaps someone should drop them a line.

    5. Re:This is absolutely shocking. by shachart · · Score: 1

      Yeah, absolutely shocking. Especially since they operate out of a refuge camp near Jenin, Israel.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
  6. Just what the MPAA wants... by Kedisar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now they can delete all those movies from your hard disk!

    1. Re:Just what the MPAA wants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Now they can delete all those movies from your hard disk!

      Not if I delete them first! Lousy formulaic pieces of shit each and every one of them!

    2. Re:Just what the MPAA wants... by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or maybe this is just a ploy by the RIAA/MPAA to get people to uninstall the software. I realize that code is provided and this is probably legit, but if they see that a "scare" of this type succeeds in getting people to stop using ES5, maybe they'll try something similar with Kazaa, but fake.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    3. Re:Just what the MPAA wants... by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      RTFA. the exploit code is included with the article; you may feel free to try it yourself to either affirm or diminish your skepticism.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
  7. I don't have to uninstall... by BlackBolt · · Score: 3, Funny

    It deleted itself.

  8. Well yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A P2P service that ACTIVELY PROMOTES piracy? It sounded too good to be true, and it was. All of this wonderful information from some schmoe with an email @yahoo.com? This whole deal is shady, no matter how you look at it.

    1. Re:Well yeah.. by maxbang · · Score: 1
      But he has a WEBSITE! Maybe if he posted this on his "blog" you would believe him? ;-)

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    2. Re:Well yeah.. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, fuck, they had(may still have) naked news for free.

      they can delete any file i care :)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Well yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The person who posted this advisory is definitely not a Joe Schmoe.

      This is Random Nut. THE Random Nut. You may have heard of him? No? Does KaZaA Lite K++ ring any bells at all? That's him. He knows what he's talking about. If you don't, try the exploit for yourself. Works as he says it does. Or decompile ES5 on a sacrificial machine.

      Warning: ES5 is very obviously a crock of shit and I've been saying so since release; alarm bells were ringing for me, frankly, as soon as I saw the website, especially the amusing comments (I'd link, but it's Flash) about Freenet, which is anonymous - ES5's "anonymity"? Well, you can download using overloaded, possibly monitored public web proxies. Streaming movies? From a Dutch web server via mms. Free porn? Thumbnail pages. Notice, though, no special features regarding music. Odd, that. Odd, isn't it?

      The alarm bells rang loudly enough for me that when I tried it out, I tried it out on a sacrificial machine. About thirty minutes later I dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda'd the machine from a LiveCD - I'd seen enough.

      I'll say again now what I said then, only with the hunches of the K++ creator backing it up as well as my own hunches: EarthStation5 is probably an RIAA-linked sting operation.

      Plus, it doesn't even fucking work. :)

    4. Re:Well yeah.. by SlashSnot · · Score: 1

      You need to take a look around the net before you slam someone... Random Nut is legit.

  9. Now who couldn't see this coming? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That's what you get for installing binaries from an untrusted/unknown source.
    How long have the RIAA been making noises about hacking people's computers to delete illegal mp3s? And after this, people are still happy to trust that a binary program from a very mysterious organization isn't just a piece of RIAA spy/malware? Quick, break out the cluebats...

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
    1. Re:Now who couldn't see this coming? by grub · · Score: 1


      That's what you get for installing binaries from an untrusted/unknown source.

      Yup. I compile my own eMule client from source (with a few custom things that help my bandwidth ;)) Of course it would be foolish to assume that I've gone through every line of source looking for exploits but there are a lot of contributors to the project and the source is there for all to see.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Now who couldn't see this coming? by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      notice especially how many different languages it's in. now who could possibly have the funding and interest to make all those translations? hmmmmmm...

    3. Re:Now who couldn't see this coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody's grumpy and needs a nappy.

  10. Earth Station 5 - legalese by Stalyx · · Score: 5, Funny

    And in other news when Reuter's contacted Earth Station 5's lead programmer, he had apparently mumbled under his breath.. "its not a bug damnit!, it's a feature"

    1. Re:Earth Station 5 - legalese by sunryder · · Score: 1

      Read the article; the Full Disclosure Post indicates that this malicious code (and some other malicious code that allows DoS) was intentionaly added into the program, and is most likely a Feature and not a Bug.

    2. Re:Earth Station 5 - legalese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in other news when Reuter's contacted Earth Station 5's lead programmer, he had apparently mumbled under his breath.. "its not a bug damnit!, it's a feature" ... And was promptly hired by Microsoft.

    3. Re:Earth Station 5 - legalese by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would tend to agree. The odds of a programmer 'accidently' adding working code capable of deleting an end user's files or participating in a DDoS is about as likely as a programmer 'accidently' having sex with a pretty woman. It can happen, but it takes a LOT of work and planning on the part of the programmer (and wasn't an accident.)

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    4. Re:Earth Station 5 - legalese by MegaFur · · Score: 2, Funny
      The odds of a programmer 'accidently' adding working code capable of deleting an end user's files or participating in a DDoS is about as likely as a programmer 'accidently' having sex with a pretty woman.

      Well gee, darn, there goes that fantasy...

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    5. Re:Earth Station 5 - legalese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not much experience with software development, ay? That would be the quintessential "oldest joke in the book". When confronted with a bug where the programmer is too lazy or doesn't think it is worthy of his time to fix, the response to marketing (or management): "It's a feature, not a bug". Also can be used for a good laugh if the unintended "feature" happens to do something really cool.

    6. Re:Earth Station 5 - legalese by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      Whereas in this instance I'm sure you are correct, I have seen programs that have features that.... do a bit more than inteded. We had at one point a need to, under a particular circumstance, erase the contents of a laptop which had been stolen (when it next tried to log-in, which it would automatically do, after having been marked stolen). The programmer, not knowing much about PCMCIA drives and flashcards, went a bit overboard. All we wanted was to erase the data. Our first trial and it took us a couple of days to recover the hardware(!) into a working state once again (he *really* did an number on it). So it is possible to have code exceed your expectations, especially if it is in a partially-understood aspect or area. But I'm sure that the case in point is no accident! Damn! If you can't trust piracy advocates, who can you trust? All my illusions are shattered.... All your systems are belong to us!

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    7. Re:Earth Station 5 - legalese by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Jesus, now that is funny. I can only envision the machine after a BIOS tweak stops the CPU fan and the entire thing comes back as a smoking piece of molten plastic and twisted metal and everybody is looking at the programmer with heads full of 'dude - we said wipe, not nuke'

      Reminds me of one of the first small peer to peer networks I ever set up years ago ... engineering department. The junior IS guy was in the building doing (??) maintenance and he saw that one guy's G: drive had a bunch of stuff in the root directory that didn't need to be there (looked like the root directory of a boot drive, which obviously didn't need to be on this engineer's G: drive) so he just started blowing away files. What the hell is this engineer doing, looks like he has a \DOS and a \Windows directory on his G: drive too - poof. And this was that junior IS guy's introduction to peer to peer networking, and his invitation never to visit the engineering department ever again. Those engineering guys sure can hold a grudge - remotely blow away one senior engineer's workstation while he is in the middle of a project and all of a sudden nobody likes you - grin.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  11. Tinfoil alarm! by sebi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wouldn't that be just the cleverest act of terrorism you can think of? Bait the "foreign devils" with all you hate about them and then, BAM!, nuke millions of computers in an instant. Takes more preparation to get off the ground than your garden variety virus or worm but the pay-off is much greater, isn't it? And if I was living in Palestine threat of legal action by some American interest group would be the least of my worries.

    1. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, you must be a smart college educated type.


      Fuckwad. (please check it yourself - that's what you are)

    2. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Defending your own country against and invader (please check it for yourself - that's what Israel is) is not "terrorism".
      It's not the cause that deinfes terrorism it's the tactics. Blowing up busses with civilian children on them is terrorism.

    3. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh, perhaps you should re-read history. I believe it was the ARAB states which attacked Israel first on three separate occasions. (Once on a Jewish high holy day -- that kinda reveals the basic hypocrisy of Islam: Scream if it affects you, Do it if it helps you)

      Yes, yes, I know that Palistine was taken away from the the Palistinians, but it was the BRITS who partitioned the country. Not the Israelis. The Israelis are just trying to protect themselves against idiots who think targeting children is legitimate warfare.

    4. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by adam613 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Defending your own country against and invader (please check it for yourself - that's what Israel is) is not "terrorism".

      Please check your history before you post. The Palestinians did not come into existence until 16 years after the British handed over 1/3 of what the UN resolution required to form present-day Israel. The creation of the Palestinians was a response to Egypt and Syria realizing that they couldn't destroy Israel by military force. Since the Palestinians didn't exist when Israel invaded, Israel is not an invader.

      Furthermore, purposely attacking civilians is a war crime, and therefore is terrorism even if you are being invaded.

      For the US citizens: If Mexico invades Texas, you're allowed to defen yourselves without Mexico calling you terrorists.

      This is also incorrect. Since George Bush was elected governor of Texas, and he is a terrorist, the Mexicans can call Texans terrorists whether or not they are defending themselves from invasions.

    5. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by sebi · · Score: 1
      Defending your own country against and invader (please check it for yourself - that's what Israel is) is not "terrorism".

      While I might be tempted to agree with that statement under certain circumstances it does not apply here. Should my assumption be correct (and there are some huge "ifs" involved) then this attack would, or could, be targeted at every nation with a high percentage of personal computers. Israel is not the only country that qualifies for that. As such it would not be defence against an aggressor but offence against multiple bystanders. I would not go as far as calling them innocent, but they might not be actively involved in the conflict.

    6. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I realize that perhaps, to many of you, computers and the Internet is Life Itself. However, a massive computer mixup is NOT a disaster on the scale of WTC or some other event causing major casualties.

      I just get annoyed when I hear a computer attack referred to as an effective terrorist strategy. I certainly could survive if my computer didn't turn on today; no terror here, just kind of disappointment. Perhaps something like this could be called a "bummer. oh well" attack.

      --
      ...
    7. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      If Mexico invades Texas and I defend it by attacking soliders, that's war (maybe guerilla war). If Mexico invades Texas and I defend it by walking up to Mexican civilians and blowing myself and them up, I'm a terrorist and that isn't justified even given the fact that Mexico invaded Texas.

    8. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blowing up bus loads of civilians or driving a car bomb into a cafe, however, makes you a terrorist. I don't care who invaded whom.

    9. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid dumbfuck stop watching CNN...

    10. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Paulo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Interesting. Since you are so versed in history, you might want to explain too: if the state of Israel is an invader, why did the people who form it felt the need to "invade" the Middle East? Where did they come from in the first place?

      (Yes, yes, offtopic, I know).

    11. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if I was living in Palestine threat of legal action by some American interest group would be the least of my worries.

      Interesting, because the CIA or the Mosad would be part of my biggest worries. I would know I would either die or be shipped in a box to some remote Island on which neither American nor Israely law exists.

      But maybe you don't regard these two as American interest groups when millions of Americans are nuked by a 'virus' ;-)

    12. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does bulldozing buildings filled with homes of innocent civilians terrorism? Oh no wait it`s not since it`s done by the "army". Get it through your head this is all the Palestinians got to fight against the high tech US powered israeli army. Are they suppose to sit back and wait for the whole country to be invaded and all their homes destroyed?

    13. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by skarmor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      realize that perhaps, to many of you, computers and the Internet is Life Itself. However, a massive computer mixup is NOT a disaster on the scale of WTC or some other event causing major casualties. I just get annoyed when I hear a computer attack referred to as an effective terrorist strategy. I certainly could survive if my computer didn't turn on today; no terror here, just kind of disappointment. Perhaps something like this could be called a "bummer. oh well" attack.

      Nobody really cares if you can turn your computer on. However, a carefully planned attack on financial institutions/networks, military networks and other government systems could be quite effective. This is why said institutions are fanatical about security (or at least they should be).

    14. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by LizardKing · · Score: 4, Informative

      Please check your history before you post. The Palestinians did not come into existence until 16 years after the British handed over 1/3 of what the UN resolution required to form present-day Israel.

      That's either amazing ignorance you've got there, or just the most blatant bit of lying I've seen on Slashdot for days. The "protectorate" of Palestine existed between the two world wars, and was effectively a colony of the British Empire. Jewish immigration increased dramatically during this period, a result of increased interest in Zionism, itself largely a result of anti-Jewish activity in Europe.

      Palestine may not have been an independent nation state, but the Palestinian people had existed as a distinct race since biblical times when the Semitic tribes split along religious grounds. Remember that Jews and Palestinians are both Semitic races.

      Israel was created following the even bigger influx of Jewsih refugees after the Second World War. Many of these refugees brought bitter memories of the concenration camps with them, and a willingness to use force to gain a nation state. The British were unable to control the situation, having been effectively bankrupted by the war, and eventually pulled out after increased bombings of their official buildings, etc. The result was bloodshed, as the Jewish militias ehnically cleansed large parts of Palestine. Pretty ironic considering the background to the Jewish desire for a nation state.

      Chris

    15. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Troed · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I know my history - now - do you know anything about that region? Do you know that Israel currently occupies twice the area they were given by the previous incarnation of the UN? Do you know that they're building a wall around "their" country - which just happens to be including a lot of that illegally occupied territory?

      I'm also interested in hearing if anyone who replied to me claiming Palestinians are terrorists because they're targetting civilians/children know that Israel are targetting civilians/children themselves? What does that make the state of Israel?

      Really.

    16. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said.

    17. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is and never has been a Palestine.
      The "Palestinians" are refugees from Jordan.

    18. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell does CNN have to do with it?

    19. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Paulo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Do you know that they're building a wall around "their" country - which just happens to be including a lot of that illegally occupied territory?

      And how did they come in posession of that "ilegally occupied" territory? Through the wars in 1967 and 1973, right? And who started those wars? Oops...

    20. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don`t know then your a dumbfuck too..
      Get out of ur shell

    21. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Troed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      For an explanation to why the state of Israel has expanded its borders you need to look no longer than their religion. They truly believe they have a God-given right to the _whole_ country - not just the area they got for free from the former UN - but current Palestine too.

    22. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Innocent civilians my ass. They're bulldozing the safe houses used by terrorists. They can't go inside because they're all booby trapped.

      Looks, it's pretty easy to figure out the good guys and the bad guys here.

      The Israelis have a powerful, modern army, and the Arabs do not. Notice how the Jews do not just wipe out the entire population of Arabs in "Palestine." Now consider if the situation were reversed, and the Palestinians had the tanks, and the Jews had the rocks. Do you honestly believe that the Palestinians wouldn't kill every single Jew in Jerusalem?

      Good guys: Israel
      Bad guys: Palestinians

    23. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrorism doesn't have to be about death and destruction. Mayhem is often the real target. If a few people can't use their systems, no big deal. But if a large portion of the net and/or computers suddenly became paperweights the impact would be significant. I know that at least 35% of the people in my company would immediately become unproductive.

    24. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raining rockets down into civilian areas filled with children is what Israel does daily.

      Not to mantion commiting war crimes by building settlements on occupied land.

    25. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Troed · · Score: 1

      ... and that somehow justifies Israel breaking every single UN resolution ever written - and the only reason for them not being mor harshly dealt with is because the US blocks all resolutions Israel doesn't like? Does it justify Israel not following the rules laid out in the peace agreements? Does that give Israel the right to kill civilians, children and peace workers at will?

      Israeli "Berlin Wall"

      Israeli military killing members of the press

    26. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by cybermace5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh come on, nobody worries about that! Everyone here's just scared they won't be able to check email, post on Slashdot, run a game of Counterstrike. They would have to stumble out of doors, mixing with the rest of the population...uh...ok I see why this would be a terrorist attack now.

      --
      ...
    27. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      then by all accounts Hiroshima was an act of terror. this whole terrorist movement was started by the US.

    28. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya the Arabs started those wars just like Saddam started that last Iraq war right? please...

    29. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Paulo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, that's not the question I am asking. What I'm asking is: why did all those jews who live in Israel felt the need to move to the Middle East and "steal the land" of the palestinians, when they could have stayed peacefully in their homes in Dusseldorf, Munich or Berlin?

      I am asking this because there are many (the own palestinians among them) who complain not only about Israel expanding "beyond their borders", but about its mere existence at all. According to them, Israel and those who live in it simply have no business staying in the Middle East. Which begs the question, of course, of what to do then with all the jews who live there...

    30. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by sebi · · Score: 1

      The problem is that such an attack would not only reach private machines, but quite a few computers that have no business running such a software in the first place. Since almost everything is running Windows these days the few crucial computers you could take out in addition to the "meaningless" ones might have a very large impact. Their fifteen million user-base might or might not be a fact. Just claiming it might make a lot of people think that they are trustworthy and cool, and get es5 one step closer to the claimed number. I don't know if you might manage to produce another power-failure this way, or if you could keep planes and trains from staying on schedule. I do know, however, that not being able to access my favourite web-site would not be all that I had to worry about.

    31. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It`s amazing how good solid propaganda can totally fuck over any comon sense people would have. Such a simple situation turned into such propaganda bullshit and it actually works.

      There are the simple facts that no one can deny :
      - Palestinians living in Palestine in their homes and the homes of their fathers (some jews lived with them too, a minority)
      - Jews run away from Europe and go to Palestine (remember Hitler?)
      - Jews start to take over Palestine
      - Arabs try to resist they fail miserably

      It has been turned into some crap like this :
      - Palestians kill innocent Israeli Civilians (that are probably living in the home of the father of the suicide bomber, but thats beside the point...).

      Either your a Jew, or you are not stupid enough to be lied to and beleive it.

    32. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the most ignorant racist thing I have scene on slashdot since that "Nigger Ownership HOWTO" a couple weeks ago.

      You sir a big fascist.

      But that's natural since you're probably American.

    33. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent should not be modded up, as some of the other replies explain, it's a very bad explanation of actual history. Israel has never been a real state, Jewisch and Palestinian people (mostly farmers) lived together for quite a long period of time until Israel 'had to' become a state filled up by Jewisch people all over the world who had never even seen Israel before.

      Yes, WW II was awful, but that does not mean something else awful should be put in place.

      Israel is there, it should not be removed since that would also be a cruel action. But please people, let's make sure we point Israel to its international obligations with respect to human rights. They're also just people, and as a state, they're currently showing the dark-side of what mankind is capable of (both out of fear but also out of utter cruelty).

      My prediction: this violence will end in some decades when everyone is finnally COMPLETELY convinced the 'current way' is not the way to solve any issues. Until then, fear and selfishness rules the area.

      But hey, one keeps hoping every good word said will make the time until this matter is solved shorter ;-)

    34. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then by all accounts Hiroshima was an act of terror. this whole terrorist movement was started by the US.
      Yes it was an act of Terror. As GWB said "Yhe only reason for a country to possess weapons of mass destruction is for terrorism." I don't think he realized that included the USA but still doesn't make him wrong.

    35. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by sbeitzel · · Score: 1

      The result was bloodshed, as the Jewish militias ehnically cleansed large parts of Palestine. Pretty ironic considering the background to the Jewish desire for a nation state.

      Well, sort of. I mean, yeah, I appreciate the irony in the short time context of, say, a couple hundred years. On the other hand, I look at all the books in the Old Testament that documented the wanderings of the tribes of Israel and their S.O.P. when they came into an area (Exodus, Joshua, Judges,...) which pretty much involved killing off or driving out everyone who wasn't in the club. "Ethnic cleansing" is just the modern term for "the way you take territory" in the old, old school.

      This is not to say that I think it's a good idea. I just appreciate the irony of the karmic rebound. That is to say, yup, you're absolutely right about the whole fucked-up situation, and it's even funnier in a grim sort of way than you'd originally pointed out. Because there's nothing funny about dead civilians spread in chunks all over the street, but there's poetic injustice enough to go around.

      --
      Oh, go on, check out my job.
    36. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Paulo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Does it justify it? Well, we'll never know, will we? If those who started the wars of 1967 and 1973 hadn't done so, maybe Israel would never have had the chance to commit those atrocities you talk about. Maybe they wouldn't have the chance to build that wall (which, BTW, is opposed by many in the religious right in Israel), because they wouldn't be in possesion of the land in question. But gosh, we'll never know now, will we? After all, why bother researching who were the first ones to attack, when you can easily blame it all on the jews?

    37. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the question of what do you do with all the Palestinian refugees kicked out of their ancestral homes and put into filthy camps all because the Europeans can't stop waging wars on each other?

      Why is it the Palestinians fault that the Europeans allowed a genocidal maniac in power.

      REally, what does some events in Germany have to do with the Palestinians? Nothing.

      I know it's a typical European thought that if some rich white guys from Europe want some more land they can just find a nicespot, kill off the local population and build a European colony that suits their fancy. (America, Australia, Israel)

      However, to the rest of the world that is barbarism.

    38. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what's your point. Fighting against terrorism with terrorism is still terrorism. Once again it is not the cause but the tactics. Both sides are terrorists. Hell GWB is a terrorist.

    39. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Please provide a reference to the seperate existence of a group known as the 'Palestinians' from before 1960 or so. Otherwise, readers might think you were just making it up and repeating Palestinian propaganda wholesale.

    40. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If you main method of "defending" your "country" is killing women and childern then, yes, what you are doing is terrorism.

    41. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You fail to realize something. . . *YOU* might only use your computer for stuff that isn't that critical. . . But others do (granted someone would have to be a complete *idiot* to put something like ESV on a computer that is used for critical stuff, but anyhow. . .). As an example, I (currently - temp job) work at a hospital. If somehow, a terrorist group managed to majorly disrupt the hospital computer systems, it would cause a lot of havoc. Probably no one would die. . . but someone could possibly.

      Consider this scenario - the computers go out. Someone gets rushed into the emergency room. Doctors aren't able to get medical history for the patient, and inadvertantly administer a drug to which the patient has a fatal alergic reaction. That type of thing. Computers are a lot more important in modern life than a lot of people realize. That was just one example of computer systems serving in critical roles. There are many many others. . .

      Of course, since the hospital uses a variety of different types of computer systems, not just MS servers and workstations, the hospital becomes much less suseptible to a truly crippling attack. . . because an exploit/virus/worm that attacks MS software isn't gonna bother the mainframes or other servers running non-MS software.

    42. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by sebi · · Score: 1
      Interesting, because the CIA or the Mosad would be part of my biggest worries. I would know I would either die or be shipped in a box to some remote Island on which neither American nor Israely law exists.

      But maybe you don't regard these two as American interest groups when millions of Americans are nuked by a 'virus' ;-)

      No, I don't consider the secret services of two nations to be interest groups. They are governmental in nature as opposed to the commercial nature of the two "* Associations of America."

    43. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But gosh, we'll never know now, will we? After all, why bother researching who were the first ones to attack,

      Really, it's not so easy to determine who's the first one that 'attacked'. As mentioned in other replies, the people living in that area included largely Israely and Palestinian people. But suddenly, due to an event somewhere out of their sight (Europe) an enormous amount of Israelisch migrate to the place and start to build their own country with support of some other nations that first committed enormous cruelties to these people.

      So c'mon, it should not be too difficult to see that palestinians had a reason to become angry.

      when you can easily blame it all on the jews?
      I'm sorry, but in my entire history that I live on this planet, I've never heard anyone blame anything on the jews. So I kinda wonder why you say it's easy to blaim it all on the jews. As a matter of fact, I think your comment is highly inappropriate since blaiming anything on Jews is like blaming anything on blacks. It just does not make sense and sounds highly raisist.

      Blaiming anything on a state (like Israel) does make sense. And I believe the posters you're replying to are doing exactly this.

    44. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I just get annoyed when I hear a computer attack referred to as an effective terrorist strategy. I certainly could survive if my computer didn't turn on today;

      Hey tough guy, could you eat if the trucks supplying your local grocery stores suddenly stopped coming? How about your garbage pickup? I live in Memphis, where we know a thing or two about what happens when the city doesn't collect trash for a couple weeks.

      If you could sever a major metropolitan area's communication, and/or screw it up to the point where major city services weren't getting done, you could make the WTC look like a bad day at the office.

    45. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Palestine may not have been an independent nation state, but the Palestinian people had existed as a distinct race since biblical times when the Semitic tribes split along religious grounds. Remember that Jews and Palestinians are both Semitic races.
      What a fucking load of UTTER BOLLOCKS. Religion DOES NOT make a race. Now, crawl back under that rock you came from, slimy sionist.
    46. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you know that they're building a wall around "their" country "

      Oh, so if the Chinese do it we call it a world wonder...but when the evil Jews do the same its a bad thing? Hypocritical world...damn it to hell (Christian hell that is)

    47. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by ReTay · · Score: 1

      Not to mantion commiting war crimes by building settlements on occupied land.

      Got a site? Na didn't think so....
      Don't make shit up you look stupid
      gak nevermind That would be like painting ugly on a mud fence.

    48. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now where have I heard that before.... OH RIGHT!!! "Manifest Destiny"

      Well then, I guess it's alright as long as God said so.

    49. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be a huge surprise for you but in Judaism the ethnicity is very much related to religion.

      All people who practice Judaism are considered jews.

    50. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by schtum · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, I know that Palistine was taken away from the the Palistinians, but it was the BRITS who partitioned the country. Not the Israelis. The Israelis are just trying to protect themselves against idiots who think targeting children is legitimate warfare.

      Yes, the Brits, after a long, hard lobbying from the Zionists, aka the settlers of Israel, aka Israelis. The way you tell it, you'd think Israel was a giant concentration camp and the Israelis were forced to live there at gunpoint. The irony is that it's starting to look like a concentration camp, what with the shiny new fence and all the security. Face it, Israel was a stupid idea, no matter who's idea it was.

      That said, I don't believe the solution is to dissolve the state of Israel, nor do I think we can work with terrorists, but it's clear that more regard should be given to the wishes of the Palestinian people, most of whom want peace and stability. They're just not willing to pay for it with their dignity.

    51. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Terrorist acts" are usually carried out by people who have so little left that the only viable option is to make themselves part of the weapon.

    52. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Mexico has been invading the southern US for what, over 100 years now. What else is new?

      The grass really is greener on the other side of the US/Mexico border. Just read an interesting factoid the other day that more money per capita is sent home from illegal immigrants than is officially invested in Mexico, to the tune of 6 billion a year. That's some pretty green grass if you ask me. Yet, Mexico still suffers. WTF over?

    53. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by VT_hawkeye · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, if by "ethnically cleansed" you meant "watched the Palestinians get out of the way, then defended their homes as the armies of every surrounding Arab state rushed in to kill off the Jews."

      The Arabs living in the former British protectorate of Palestine basically decided in '48 that they'd just head out for a little bit, let their cousins next door clear the Jews out, and create an Arab state. They didn't bet on the Israelis (a) being able to leave behind their self-destructive infighting and (b) kicking the Jordanians', Egyptians' and Syrians' collective asses.

      That's what makes the "refugee camps" such a joke, albeit a sad one. These people were voluntary refugees. The Israeli Jews didn't run away, they defended their homes. The Palestinians could have done the same, but they didn't. Case closed. When it became clear Israel wasn't going away, the rest of the Arab world should have accepted the Palestinians into their societies rather than keeping them in camps for 55 years. Their failure to do the same, and subsequent usage of the Palestinians for political purposes is an indictment on them.

    54. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there's nothing funny about dead civilians spread in chunks all over the street,

      What if they're chunks of clown? That would be at least a little bit funny.

    55. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by schtum · · Score: 1

      No, if he were college educated he would know that the United States invaded Mexico 150 years ago so, by his logic, Mexicans have the right to blow Texans up. Californians too. Come to think of it, that's not such a bad idea, maybe he knew what he was talking about afterall!

    56. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by kubrick · · Score: 1

      The Israelis are just trying to protect themselves against idiots who think targeting children is legitimate warfare.

      Shame about the Palestinian children who get shot as "collateral damage", then. Sort of ruins their point, doesn't it?

      Get a clue; both sides have their share of homicidal maniacs, and they're the ones in charge.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    57. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Israeli Jews didn't run away, they defended their homes. The Palestinians could have done the same, but they didn't.

      So the Palestinian refugees (and their descendants) are being punished because they didn't stick around (with their children, elderly, and cripples) to protect Jews in what was about to become a war zone?

      That's insane. The Palestinian refugees are just being kept out of Israel to maintain the artificial Jewish majority (hint: many of the Russian Jews who immigrated after the USSR collapsed would have preferred to move to the USA). Suicide bombers get all the press, but the real "threat" to Israel is the massive Palestinian birth rate (especially now that the current intifada has decimated immigration to Israel).

    58. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      both sides have contributed greatly to this cockup.

      say what you will about israeli military operations - but they don't start first.

      when the current round of suicide bomb/missile strike blood feud is over and the dust settles - it is a palestinian extremist who blows up a bus and starts the ball rolling again.

      i wouldn't blame 'palestine' directly for the attacks, but since they allow such organizations to find refuge in their land - it's hard to feel sympathy for their government.

      likewise its hard to feel sympathy for the israeli government when they continue to build settlements well across the green line, and attempt to pseudo-officially annex that land into their control with this new fence.

      you'd think two peoples with such a similar history of being hated and oppressed would be more tolerant.

    59. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are an idiot.

      Hiroshima was not the first incident of civilians being bombed during a war. I believe the Germans were the first to do this.

    60. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not going to agree or disagree, but I have always thought this was funny :

      Cruise missle = the rich man's car bomb.

    61. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by paganizer · · Score: 0

      Moderators, the parent was unfairly marked as a troll, when actually it should be +3 insiteful.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    62. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Grunschev · · Score: 1

      And how did they come in posession of that "ilegally occupied" territory? Through the wars in 1967 and 1973, right? And who started those wars? Oops...

      Your recollection is a bit off. The Israelis took possession of West Bank, the Gaza Strip and the Sanai peninsula in the Six Day War of 1967. None of it was obtained in 1973. And the Israelis started the Six Day War. Is that why you said "Oops?"

      Igor

    63. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word is 'seen'.

      And damn, I missed the HOWTO from a few weeks ago - anybody got a link?

    64. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Paulo · · Score: 1

      The way you tell it, you'd think Israel was a giant concentration camp and the Israelis were forced to live there at gunpoint.

      Yeah, because of course, they could have stayed instead in their peaceful homes in Berlin, Bremen, Munich or Hamburg, where nobody would have threatened them and nobody would have tried to kill them.

    65. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      About time someone pointed that out!


      Notice that none of the other Arab states want anything to do with them either.

    66. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      First they came for the Death, but I do not like Death so I sat back and said nothing.

      Then they came for the Destruction and I thought 'well we can do without the Destruction' and I said nothing.

      Then they came to remove Mayhem from terrorism and as I was not a beliver in Mayhem - so I let them take away the Mayhem.

      When they came for me and my Shenanigans there was nobody left to speak out.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    67. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by arkanes · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Christ, are you a fucking moron or do you just like arguing? There aren't any fucking good guys here. Israels war crimes are well known and well documented. That the illegally occupy territory is a provable fact. Their human rights abuses are numerous. The arab nations surrounding them aren't neccesarily any better, either, but they don't have a fucking fan club like Israel does either. Israel should be wiped off the planet, and replaced with an actual democracy and not the fanatical, religiously prejudiced, terrorism sponsoring country thats there now.

      And sure, any other nation that meets that criteria should be too.

    68. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by GarfBond · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not to you, but imagine big corporations and what would happen if all their computers were suddenly unavailable.

      Imagine if the NYSE and the NASDAQ suddenly couldn't work because all their computers won't turn on. Granted, they might (we hope) have better security than terrorists could easily exploit, but the potential still lies there.

      If all the personal computers in the world suddenly wouldn't turn on, I wouldn't really lose any sleep (aside from the fact that I use it to watch some TV before I go to sleep :) )

    69. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey ding ding

      That is what you get when you put military assets in civilian areas.......

      But you knew that didn't you?

    70. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by CausticWindow · · Score: 0, Troll

      You twat.

      Haven't you learned that you can't argue rationally with Americans when it comes to issues like religion, history, politics, etc.? In short, anything worth discussing at all.

      They are brainwashed by their schools and their "media".

      Pledging allegiance to the flag in schools? The war on some drugs? Mixing religion (Jesus) and politics? Think of the children? It all makes some kind of twisted sense to them.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    71. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Brad+Mace · · Score: 1
      I just get annoyed when I hear a computer attack referred to as an effective terrorist strategy. I certainly could survive if my computer didn't turn on today; no terror here, just kind of disappointment. Perhaps something like this could be called a "bummer. oh well" attack.

      It is an effective terrorist strategy as long as it gets them attention. Terrorists want people to pay attention to them and their problems. While killing people certainly works, causing widespread incovenience also gets them attention, without nearly as much threat of retaliation.

      It would also make a nice front for the MPAA to extract some vigilante justice.

    72. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that!

    73. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by ephraim · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You said:
      Palestine may not have been an independent nation state, but the Palestinian people had existed as a distinct race since biblical times when the Semitic tribes split along religious grounds.

      Care to provide some proof for this? Linguistically, the Palestinians speak almost the same dialect of Arabic which Jordanians, Lebanese, and Syrians do. See http://www.lmp.ucla.edu/profiles/profl02.htm for more information.

      Until the late 1980s, Jordan still claimed ownership of the West Bank. It was only in 1989 that Jordan finally relinquished all claims to the land and its people. See http://www.kinghussein.gov.jo/his_periods9.html for more information.

      You said:
      Israel was created following the even bigger influx of Jewsih refugees after the Second World War. Many of these refugees brought bitter memories of the concenration camps with them, and a willingness to use force to gain a nation state. The British were unable to control the situation, having been effectively bankrupted by the war, and eventually pulled out after increased bombings of their official buildings, etc. The result was bloodshed, as the Jewish militias ehnically cleansed large parts of Palestine. Pretty ironic considering the background to the Jewish desire for a nation state.

      I'm not even going to bother refuting your comments about "ethnic cleansing" since they're so ridiculous.

      What I will do is try to put a nail in the coffin of the completely erroneous belief that Israel exists only due to European imperialism, and that its population is a reflection of that "fact."

      The reality is that Israeli Jews are incredibly multi-ethnic, and a very large percentage of the society has no roots in Europe! For some reason, in this whole discussion of refugees, nobody ever mentions how the high number of Jewish citizens from Arab countries who were forced to flee to Israel as refugees:

      From http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-litt man120302.asp :

      In 1945 there were about 140,000 Jews in Iraq; 60,000 in Yemen and Aden; 35,000 in Syria; 5,000 in Lebanon; 90,000 in Egypt; 60,000 in Libya; 150,000 in Algeria; 120,000 in Tunisia; and 300,000 in Morocco, including Tangiers. That comes to a total of about 960,000 -- and more than 200,000 in Iran and Turkey.

      The vast majority of these people were forced to flee their own lands into Israel. And, more recently, almost 15,000 Jews from Ethiopia -- yes, there are actually black Jews in the world! -- fled their own country and arrived in Israel.

      Pretty ironic that none of these groups have any desire to go back to the "homes" they lived in for hundreds or even thousands of years. And, unlike Palestinians who have relocated to Jordan, most of these people's children no longer consider themselves "refugees."

      Just some food for thought.

    74. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by mr_sas · · Score: 1

      or insightful even ;), personally i'd say it was funny. oh wait yeah i get it, good one

    75. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by holt · · Score: 1
      Doctors aren't able to get medical history for the patient, and inadvertantly administer a drug to which the patient has a fatal alergic reaction.

      It's pretty stupid that they have no backups for the computer systems. What happens if the patient is some random guy without any ID, and unconscious? Obviously they can't look him up in the system, right? And besides, aren't people with known allergies like that supposed to wear medi-bracelets or something, in case that happens?

      I'm not saying that the loss of computers wouldn't be a major loss to a hospital, but there really should be some sort of basic backup system to fall back on, just in case.

    76. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by holt · · Score: 1
      Hey tough guy, could you eat if the trucks supplying your local grocery stores suddenly stopped coming?

      I could, but then, I live on a farm.*

      *ok, not technically ON a farm, but my dad does farm, our house just happens to be five miles away, in town. But we could eat our food, yes.
    77. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEY Try this one THAT IS WHAT YOU GET FOR PUTTING MILITARY TARGETS IN A CIVILIAN AREA.

      Want to stop it over night? Separate the military from the civilians. But I notice in all your bleating about that you just happen to gloss over that little fact. Come on just try to deny it. I can get headlines form many different newspapers Like the NY times The BBC you name it

    78. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Palestinians into their societies rather than keeping them in camps for 55 years"

      You do of course know that under UN mandates there are supposed to be 2 countries. Palestine and Israel.

      Not just Israel. May I suggest you get your facts 100% right instead of posting this kind of stupid rant in the future.

    79. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because of course, [Jews] could have stayed instead in their peaceful homes in Berlin, Bremen, Munich or Hamburg, where nobody would have threatened them and nobody would have tried to kill them.
      You've got a point. If any people was to be dispossessed to right the wrong done by the Nazis to the Jews, it should have been the Germans. But I think the vision of the Germans as a wandering tribe was too scary, and besides we wanted them to help fight the Commies, so we ripped land off from some third-world farmers instead.

    80. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by geekee · · Score: 1

      That conspiracy theory is more plausable than the one put forth by the article. Who really believes the MPAA would promote p2p so they can delete your movie files. Without the p2p, you won't have any illegal movie files.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    81. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by ReTay · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Get it through your head this is all the Palestinians got to fight against the high tech US powered Israeli army

      (Sniff) (Sniff)
      I smell an agenda...

    82. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by M00TP01NT · · Score: 1
      I know that at least 35% of the people in my company would immediately become unproductive.

      And the productivity of the other 65% would immediately surge!
    83. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps something like this could be called a "bummer. oh well" attack.

      Yeah Yeah - Let's start the "WAR ON BUMMER". Let's capture all bummerists. Sign me up. bummernator@homelandsecurity.gov

    84. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whether or not someone watches CNN does not alter the definition of terrorism. Military targets are war. Civilian targets are terrorism. Whether or not that agrees with what CNN calls terrorism is not important.

    85. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Israel is proactively defending themselves, and they don't target civillians specifically.

      They go after the Hammas guys, bombers and so fourth, and they've probably got a 10:1 ratio militant kills:civillian kills.

      The Palastinians go after mostly civilians. Have you ever seen a news report claiming attacks on the Israeli military? Yeah, maybe. But it's certianly not every day, such as are the civilian bombings. Not only that, the dumb fuckers catch their own Muslim kind in the blasts more often than not.

      They easily have a 100:1 civilian:military casualty record. That's why they're called terrorists. They employ terrorist tactics, and target non-combatants almost exclusively.

      If they were fighting a war, we would call them guerrillas. But, they're not, so they're fucking terrorists.

    86. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Believe it or not, things have changed just a little in half a century.

      In WWII bombing entire cities was part of war. The Germans started it and the Allies did the same with their air raids over Germany--in large part because industrial power was mixed among residential and we didn't have smart or accurate bombs--so you just bombed everything. Hiroshima was just more of the same during WWII. It also ended the war--terrorism tends to provoke it.

      Anyway, the point is that what was standard practice nearly 60 years ago in WWII is no longer acceptable today. And at least Hiroshima had a military purpose even then. What military purpose is there in blowing up a busfull of civilians and children?

      I'd go so far as to say that terrorism may simply be acts of war with a complete lack of *military* objective.

    87. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      Since almost everything is running Windows these days
      Nope. *nix is still the most used *server* OS out there. So a world wide attack on MS's OSes, would not disrupt the *important* functionalities of most nations. The real work will continue to get done : )
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    88. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Madcapjack · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      You've got a point. If any people was to be dispossessed to right the wrong done by the Nazis to the Jews, it should have been the Germans.

      well actually, it perhaps it would have been better to just give Rome and its surrounding territories to the Jews, since the Romans were the ones who kicked them out of Israel in the first place.

    89. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you but I would say if someone parks a tank on a hill side and beats the hell out of the town I am living in we would be at war.

    90. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean:
      Cruise missle == the rich man's car bomb.

    91. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm WTF?????
      The germans? No I don't think so that would be all the way back to the days of the city states.

      Read up on seige equipment. Just what do you think it was for after all?

    92. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was in pascal.

    93. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Obviously, you've never experienced the terror inherent in a Windows reinstallation (where you can spend an hour watching it copy files and reboot 6 times, only to find that it's exactly in the same corrupted state at which you started).

    94. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Troed · · Score: 1

      Sorry? Are you saying Israel isn't building settlements on occupied land? Even Israel admits that ... (Google is source enough - every major news outlet will have some articles on it)

    95. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Something like that could cripple any number of companies, resulting in decreased productivity,lost jobs, reduced quality of life, and awareness of the organization that takes credit for it. That is a blow against the corporate space and, while not causing death, could conceivably have a greater impact on society in general than WTC did (more people die of the flu in the US in two years than died in WTC - just a blip on the greater scale).

      The only thing that WTC did directly to me is expose yet again how pathetic humanity can be, how unaware the world in general is to security (both physical and cyber), and how much politics and media can spin anything.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    96. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It`s amazing how good solid propaganda can totally fuck over any comon sense people would have."

      Yep you are a pretty good example of that all right.

      "Either your a Jew, or you are not stupid enough to be lied to and beleive it."

      That is a pretty narrow view point there but that is not surpriseing. Most bigots love to try and make the world that way.

    97. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by ReTay · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      But that's natural since you're probably American.

      Trendy Americian bashing like that give you any credibility. **YAWN**

    98. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Troed · · Score: 1

      Oh I know all that - I just find it funny when they make fools out of themselves in public. I have no hope of ever convincing a US citizen (or an Israeli citizen) that they need to change their view of the world for the rest of us to stop laughing/despising them.

    99. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Not to be arbitrary, but I don't think that "Earthstation 5" will have the oppurtunity to be installed on these mission critical systems. I imagine that the military or any financial institution would be very concerned about finding p2p file-sharing packets mixed in with the rest of their bandwidth.

      I think that only home/private users would/could be affected by this thing.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    100. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      I live in Memphis, where we know a thing or two about what happens when the city doesn't collect trash for a couple weeks.

      Yeah, it's called Graceland, isn't it?

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    101. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interpretations such as this is bread from ignorance. You take history and some bias to present an interpretation that has little or nothing to do with hisory.

    102. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Palestine" and "Palestinian" are names that were given to a particular group of arabs by the Romans between 100BC - 200AD. This name came from the latin-ization of "philestine," which was one of the tribes. The only problem is that the people that were labelled such were not members of this tribe! The Romans just didn't know what to call these people, and so called them Palestinians. Palestine never existed before the Romans, although Israel definitely did.

      I can't stand it when people insist that there is a Palestine. It doesn't exist on the map, and the members of this "nation" are really just arabs with their head-wiring done wrong.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    103. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      "Israeli military killing members of the press"

      I dare you to find a single war that hasn't had reporters killed in it.

      In a combat zone, with on-edge, stressed troops, a camera looks remarkably like a weapon - a rocket launcher, say.

      Reporters going into a war zone know it's dangerous, they know the risks.

    104. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Bish.dk · · Score: 1

      ...itself largely a result of anti-Jewish activity in Europe.

      Yeah, I guess you can call the holocaust that.

    105. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh. Rather ironic that people still feel the need to defend Israel's *incontrovertible* right to exist by pushing around baloney of the kind of "the Palestinians don't exist".

      The Palestinians are there. They exist. They might be a race, a nation, a ragtag bunch of refugees or an exclusive golf club, but they are there and they have as much right to their land as the Israelis do.Period.

      The *bullshit* of "they should just move to another arab country" is as acceptable as someone telling a Jew that they have as much claim to the land of Israel as the roman/ottoman/british/etc empires that have occupied it in more recent times. Care to see Rome claim England as a possession ?

      One side lies, the other replies with lies. Lovely. but that is the mess we call the Middle East, mind you.

    106. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was before the Romans. Everyone took their turn picking on the Jews. Egyptians did it before the Romans, the Assyrians before them.

      Makes you wonder what exactly they did wrong.

    107. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ??? When exactly did the US invade Mexico? I seem to remember somthing about a Mexican war, where Mexico declared war because of the US annexation of Texas. And yes I am college educated.

    108. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by thales · · Score: 2, Informative

      Palestine may not have been an independent nation state, but the Palestinian people had existed as a distinct race since biblical times when the Semitic tribes split along religious grounds. Remember that Jews and Palestinians are both Semitic races.

      ROFLMAO,

      The Palestinian "race" started as a mixture of ancestral Jews who converted to Christanity, Hellenistic Greeks who converted to Christanity, and smaller ammounts of assorted semites who converted to Christanity during the later stages of the Roman Empire. The Arabic Conquest added the Arab language and Arab Genes to the mix, and in most cases a conversion to Islam, though there remains a fairly large percentage of Palestinians who are Christians. Palestinians are an ethnic subgroup of the arab culture, NOT a race.

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    109. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's called Graceland, isn't it?

      Yay for geek education. I think I'm going to shoot myself now.

    110. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and if your computer was running a power station?

    111. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your system is rooted you might not care... and neither does law enforcement.. However if through your stupidity and carelessness you become a node in a massive DDOS attack against ebay, then you are negligent and you ARE partially responsible.

      A DDOS attack against the US government would bring them to your door. Assuming they even KNOCK, you can tell them how carefree you are about security... you were providing passive assistance to terrorists in order to get cooped-up Counterstrike players some sunlight...

      Please sterilize yourself. The only thing worse than an idiot is a belligerant idiot.

    112. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Troed · · Score: 1

      War? Combat zone? Geez - do you really think that's how life is in that area?

      The real question is: Do you WANT to be this uninformed?

    113. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by hesiod · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > Yay for geek education. I think I'm going to shoot myself now.

      Yay for the humour impaired. Oh, and for shooting yourself, too, that's a big help. Thanks.

    114. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by atallah · · Score: 1

      Who are you to say they are not fighting a war. They are fighting a war against an oppressive tyrannical occupation.

      While i am not in the least condoning terrorist actions, the "Israel is proactively defending themselves" is bullshit. "Preemptive defense" is better known as "offense".

    115. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was when the US decided it would annex Texas. A college education doesn't mean much anymore I guess.

    116. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by atallah · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      not to mention... the jews took the land from whoever had it before them (Caananites if you choose to use the Bible / Torah).

      The whole "we had it first" is a circular argument - of course there is no such thing as a "pure jew" anymore in the same way that there is no person who is completely any race.

    117. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by ezraekman · · Score: 1

      The Palestinians living in camps are not there simply because they're being "ordered" to be by the surrounding Arab nations; many of them have nowhere else to go. Other attrocities aside, Israel is currently displacing Palestinians by the hundreds, bulldozing their homes and land (including olive groves, an act expressly forbidden by the Torah) to build the "security fence", another farce that I won't discuss here. Israel does this under the guise of eminent domain... but then refuses to pay the Palestinians for the land that they destroyed/took over, and also refused to provide them with land of equitable value. Bear in mind, these are people with deeds to this land, who's families have been living there for decades, if not longer. It's not eminent domain when you don't pay for it; it's theft. Go look it up.

      Their lives thus destroyed, the Palestinians have nowhere else to go but the camps. And while I abhor terrorism, and do not condone it in *any* form, I can at least understand how this could create more suicide bombers of those who feel they have no options left, and feel that they must strike back in any way possible. Empathy is the begining of understanding, and the first step to peace, in my ever-so-humble opinion.

      Oh, and before you call me an anti-semitic, I'm Jewish. And before you tell me I have no idea, I just got back from Israel two days ago. And before you tell me I'm wrong, deluded, lying, or anything else, I asked speakers from the IDF and representatives from the Israeli Spokesman Department at several conferences if these rumors were accurate. In front of the audience, there words were "Well, plans are being discussed to compensate the Palestinians, but nothing has been agreed upon so far." This from the government that claims that Palestinians will be held to the same laws and standards of Israelis.

      I identify with my Jewish background and support my extended "family" in any way that I can. But that doesn't mean I'll stand for it when my "family" abuses it's neighbors. My eyes are open to the truth, no matter how unpleasant it may be to me. Israelis (and non-Israeli Jews) are happy to admit that they're abusing (and sometimes killing) Palestinians indiscriminately on many occasions. Their answer to my questions of legality and morality? "The rest of the world lies and violates the Geneva Convention whenever they want. Why shouldn't we?"

      My eyes are still open. How about yours?

    118. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm - how naive do you have to be to think that deliveries would not be made due to a computer outage?

      Oh, I see...

    119. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by atallah · · Score: 1

      what about the "Settlers" that are put into the occupied territories... if they are not asking to become targets, i don't know how else to classify them.

    120. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many people do you think would die as a result of an internet attack? Two or three?

      The world got along perfectly well without computers and businesses already have had company-wide outages and dealt with them.

      But when the only real job you've had is in IT, I guess the forest gets lost from the trees.

      And BTW, the vast majority of mission critical servers are not going to be effected by the sort of attack a script kiddie could create. They would require an uber-hacker working on that system specifically. Only systems designed and run by idiots need worry about the sort of threat mentioned in the article...

    121. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, you mean like the Palestinian resident of Silwan? The one who left his house for one night to attend a wedding celebration and returned to find it taken over by Israelis? Apparently, the Israeli settlers considered his one night of absence as an "abandonment" of his home.

      There are countless similar stories.

      Posting AC so that this topic doesn't follow me for the rest of my Slashdotting days.

    122. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

      I just get annoyed when I hear a computer attack referred to as an effective terrorist strategy. I certainly could survive if my computer didn't turn on today; no terror here, just kind of disappointment. Perhaps something like this could be called a "bummer. oh well" attack.

      Maybe that's true for your computer and mine, but what about the computers that manage electrical grids, or air traffic control, or nuclear power plants? Don't be so naive.

    123. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Catskul · · Score: 1

      Way to group 360 000 000 people into one group, and assume that they all argue the same way and believe the same thing. You've obviously either never been to the USA, or you have and talked to 1 person in the time you were visiting.

      What ever your evidence is to support your claims, (which, based on your awesome sterotyping powers, Im going to guess, is both limited and severly flawed), you have provided evidence that you, yourself, are irrational.

      --

      Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    124. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by ephraim · · Score: 1
      The above post is a (rather awful) reference to the following poem, written by Pastor Martin Niemoller about resistance during the Nazi era.

      No offense to the author of the post above, but you've really mangled the meaning and intent of his poem.

      You can find the original poem(s) at http://scott.hayes.org/thoughts/niemoller.html.

      /EJS

    125. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by CausticWindow · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, the brainwashing must be really effective. I have no other explanation for it.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    126. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by cybermace5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe Homer Simpson would run Earthstation 5 on the nuclear control system, I don't know. But my point remains that while all of the above are inconvenient, they are not the same as sitting in your office with your morning coffee, and looking up to see an airliner bearing down on your stapler. Or getting your throat slit with a razor. See the difference? Attaching terrorism to computers is only another way to raise up fear and hype in this community too, and welcome more control of it. I realize that we who work with computers would like to think it is so important as to classify an attack as terrorism, but it just does not have that whole aspect of terror. Terror is looking out the window and seeing all your kids killed by a rocket-propelled grenade on your front lawn. Do you care about the fridge not working at that point?

      --
      ...
    127. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel targeting civilians? hardly. There HAS GOT to be a distinction made between the two. on one hand, you have you have the Palestinian terror organizations who go on a civilian bus and blow them selves up, with the object of killing as many innocent people as possible, and on the other, you have the Israelis who fire a bomb at a legitimate military or political target that may or may not have civilians nearby. The Israelis do *not* set out to specifically kill innocent Palestinians.... do you think they send apache's out into gaza or the west bank with the target of a 5 year old girl? no, of course not. although it's a sad inevitability of warfare when such an event does happen. But in contrast, the Palestinian terror groups do set out to kill innocent men, women, and children as their main objective.

    128. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      igor,

      the entire arab region had massed troops at their borders and the israelis had every I&W (indication and warning) to believe another war against israel was on the way. The Israeli military strategy is - and has always been - a defensive one. Compared to the hundreds of milions of Arabs in the region, the whole israeli population has about 9 million people. They would never have started the six day war with those odds stacked against them, unless they had to.

    129. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to take something into account, Troed, and that is the 3 year intifidah. certainly that has raised the stakes for the actions israel must take to defend itself. Besides, the UN largely is an anti-semetic organization. the Israelis arent even allowed a rotating seat on the security council, are they?

    130. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Wose than the NYSE stops working, is it continues working, but some peoples records get lost, and some transactions deleted, and its hours or days before people really notice the stock values are drifting farther and farther from what people thought they did. Party A says they got notice a transaction got through, and sues Party B for losing the records. Party C sold stock to Party A, and the prices and numbers shown don't agree. There's five million cases of A-B-C, and five million more where someone didn't have a problem, but they lost money that day so they're claiming they did now. No one's sure just when the problem started, and everyone is sueing to get an official finding for that time that supports their making money, or at least not losing so much. How many businesses fold in the next six months? Does a 25% unemployment rate count as more damage than the WTC? Maybe congress is about to vote on funding the 2nd Iraq war and suddenly that 87 billion is half of next year's projected government revenues.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    131. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by plumby · · Score: 1
      Imagine if the NYSE and the NASDAQ suddenly couldn't work because all their computers won't turn on.

      Oh no. What a disaster that would be. People wouldn't be able to spend imaginary money playing with the artificial values of companies.

      I doubt many people would be particularly harmed if the NASDAQ wasn't available for a few days. Wouldn't air traffic control or hospital medical records be a better example of something worth worrying about?

    132. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by plumby · · Score: 1

      I doubt the truck to my local grocery store would stop running if the computers stopped working. I think the owner knows where the farm is and can probably remember to get the stock on a regular basis without needing his PC to prompt him.

    133. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Eh?

      Presuming that one already knows the poem, I think the grandparent post is kind of funny -- it's at least interesting to see a different spin.

      (Yes, it [the post] makes light of a gravely important concept... but what good's humor if it can only make light of things that aren't all that heavy to begin with?)

    134. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by ephraim · · Score: 1
      I'm sure that the poster of that comment intended it to be funny. I just did not find it humorous in the least.

      It *is* possible to be funny about serious subjects. It's just a bit harder to do so. And while the guy may get a star for effort, I thought he fell flat in the implementation.

      On the bright side, at least he was familiar with the poem. Most people probably won't get the reference.

      /EJS

    135. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      That's what the words _effective_ terrorist strategy mean. It's not a matter of just crashing a system or two, its a matter of taking control of a system, and making it do whatever appears likelyest to give the terrorists what they want. I.e. if there's an active war on, and you can screw with global positioning, either at the space end or somewhere in the chain of reports, you can shut it down, and a bunch of tank commanders will still fight pretty well in manual mode. Get it to give false info instead of just no info, and those same tanks just may generate a thousand "friendly fire" or "5 year old collateral damage" deaths. If you get into air traffic control, maybe a blanket shut down causes a crash or two, but with skillful misdirection, the system may appear to be working normally, until there are so many planes in a few selected small spaces that a dozen major collisions are inevitable. Assume that a cyber-terrorist has at least two things, a better than average exploit to get into the system, and a better than average idea of what he wants that system to do once he's there. It's just as much of a mistake to expect the terrorist to take over a system without a major goal in mind as it would be to assume he's going to successfully hijack four airliners, then aim them all at wallmarts.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    136. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Madcapjack · · Score: 1
      The whole "we had it first" is a circular argument - of course there is no such thing as a "pure jew" anymore in the same way that there is no person who is completely any race.

      Race has almost zero biological reality. It has social and cultural reality. What the hell is a pure Jew anyway? Analogously, who is a pure Christian?

    137. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Troed · · Score: 1

      Besides, the UN largely is an anti-semetic organization

      Uhh. Yeah. Whatever ... you know "anti-semitic" is getting old - it doesn't work anymore. The world isn't against jews (that's what you meant, right? Arabs are Semites too though .. ) and calling people anti-semitic when they're clearly not only makes Israel look even more pathetic.

      Israel might get that seat when they withdraw from the occupied territories, tear down the walls, tear down the illegal settlements and reimburse Palestinian families who's houses they've bulldozed down.

    138. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are such a twat

    139. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by X-rated+Ouroboros · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because you just know that a well organized technologically sophisticated terrorist cell would target the average user's access to pr0n. Hit us where it hurts, right? Infidel western devils just gotta have that pr0n.

      Perhaps it hasn't occurred to you, but computers run: air traffic control, banking, train switching, power production and distribution, water treatment purification and distribution, and pretty much all communication technology at this point.

      Having your computer not turn on might be an "aw bummer" moment, but when you realize it's because your power isn't on... unfortunately when you try to report the outage you realize your phone can't get tone. Cellphone doesn't get service either. "Ah, well." you grumble, and get in your car to go get something to eat. Traffic is a bitch, though, all the lights are either out (due to lack of power) or behaving erratically. You stop at the ATM to get some cash for some food, but it doesn't seem to be working. You figure you could just use debit or credit card, but when you finally find a restaurant that's open they explain that they can't seem to process the cards that day. You sigh and content yourself to what you can afford with the few dollars on you: a small bowl of soup and a big glass of water. The glass of water was a bad idea, though, since a valve mix-up at the threatment plant (after they lost computer control and coordination) has contaminated half the water in the city. Your last thought a few days later as the dehydration from the sickness finally steals your conciousness for the last time? It's not about missed e-mail.

      --
      Simple Machines in Higher Dimensions
    140. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if it were just limited to your computer.

      Some PCs within the public utility, energy, and military infrastructures have human operators on them that are dumb enough to run insecure or untrustworthy software on them. Some of those PCs are in far more important positions than yours in terms of physical processes that they control.

      Your point that having all the files deleted on a computer won't cause instant death is well taken, but I hope you're not trying to contend that there's no way that a chain reaction could occur as a result of a bunch of computers being taken down at once that would result in mayhem. Blackouts can certainly cause looting and shooting, for example.

      Better to argue that a malware-infested P2P program targetted at people who think the MPAA sUx0rs is unlikely to ever make it into enough machines of importance to cause real mayhem.

    141. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Israeli incursions into Palestinian camps are combat zones. What, do you think they're going in there with squirt guns and getting flowers from the Palestinians? No, they're getting shot at, bombs stuck to their tanks, so they're gonna have itchy trigger fingers.

    142. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RORFLMAO

    143. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by lee7guy · · Score: 1

      Uhm, the holocaust didn't occur between the two world wars. Read the post before replying.

      --
      Ceterum censeo Microsoftem esse delendam
    144. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when the current round of suicide bomb/missile strike blood feud is over and the dust settles - it is a palestinian extremist who blows up a bus and starts the ball rolling again.

      What do you know about what triggered the suicide bomber that supposedly starts the whole thing? maybe it was an incident that didn't make it to the headlines? Someone's house occupied? Someones's brother beeing "collateral damage"?

      You know, people don't blow themselves up for the fun of it.

    145. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
      What we need is an ultimate final plan that would round up all the bloody Muslims. Put them to work in some camps, and then slowly kill them off until systematic death factories can be produced.

      Wait . . . I'm starting to sound like Arnold, I mean Adolf.

    146. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by adam613 · · Score: 1

      Anti-Semites are the only ones who consider Jews to be a single ethnic group.

      Did you know there are European Jews? Middle Eastern Jews? Indian Jews? African Jews?

      Did you know that some people converted to Judaism? You can't convert to an ethnicity (unless you're Michael Jackson).

    147. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by adam613 · · Score: 1
      The *bullshit* of "they should just move to another arab country" is as acceptable as someone telling a Jew that they have as much claim to the land of Israel as the roman/ottoman/british/etc empires that have occupied it in more recent times

      The claim that "they should just move to another Arab country" IS bullshit. But the claim Israel is making is that they should move back to the Arab countries they were living in before they decided to try to ethnically clense the Middle East.

    148. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by TummyX · · Score: 1

      The palestinian children aren't being purposely targetted. The islamic terrorists are purposely targetting children.

      There's a big, big difference.

    149. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by bojan · · Score: 0

      you could survive if some computer monitoring some nuclear power plant didn't turn on?

    150. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Troed · · Score: 1

      ... why don't you look up in which situations members of the press, civil liberties workers etc have been shot at by the Israel military _before_ you try to claim it's being done in combat zones?

      I promise you - sitting in a tank shooting a guy with a camera where the nearest threat MIGHT be someone throwing a stone is not called "combat".

    151. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the children on both sides... since they're dead, it doesn't make much difference to them.

      Fucking evil bastards, Sharon and Arafat both, and anyone who fights alongside them.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    152. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why exactly would some of these network be exposed to the internet anyway. Isn't that what private networks are there for. Networking does not mean connetcing to the internet in all its forms. If my bank connected its main servers and mainframes keeping all the accoutns to the internet, I would be one worried person.

    153. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      And is there an explanation for your arrogance? Your awesome stereotyping abilities? You're full of shit.

    154. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by cduffy · · Score: 1

      On the bright side, at least he was familiar with the poem. Most people probably won't get the reference.

      I think it's better known than you think. I've run into in multiple times, the first of them (if my memory serves) in a US public school.

    155. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by godders · · Score: 1

      like what? storing everyone's medical records at every hospital and doctor's surgery? mm, yeah, clever.

    156. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by TummyX · · Score: 1

      So according to you there isn't a difference between an accident and a diliberate act?

      Sure, kids on both sides are dying. But I thought you wanted to judge the moral stance of either side?

    157. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it's very comfortable for you to label me as full of shit, but deep down you still have that nagging feeling that I'm right.

      Fifty million people can't be "wrong".

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    158. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by kubrick · · Score: 1

      If you're wading in guns blazing, it's a bit cute to then claim it's an "accident" when innocent children die. If they were more honest, they'd admit they didn't really care who they killed as long as they were Palestinian, which strangely enough would seem to be the mirror of the Palestinian terrorist attitude.

      If this weren't the case then there would be inquiries, court martials, etc. whenever atrocities like Jenin happened. You can't allow yourself to sink to the same level when fighting terrorism, in the way that the Israelis and the Americans have -- otherwise the things you're supposedly fighting for are thrown away in the process.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    159. Re:Tinfoil alarm! by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      I wasn't looking to rattle anybody's cage - actually it just sort of happened upon me and I felt compelled to share it. It wasn't a political statement.

      That said, I encourage any man who can make better use of the word 'Shenanigans' in a coherent poem be the one to cast the first stone.

      Because hey, poem'in ain't as easy as people might think.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  12. Good thing it wasn't email by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I had received this in my Inbox, I probably would have ignored it. It's interesting that I'm conditioned (brainwashed?) to ignore this stuff when it's in an email, but when I read it on /. I take it seriously.

    1. Re:Good thing it wasn't email by supergiovane · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Slashdot!
      It's always a pleasure to meet new friends. 'Cause ... mmh ... are you new to this place, ain't you?

      --
      Signatures are for stupids.
    2. Re:Good thing it wasn't email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you noticed his UID is *lower than yours*?!

    3. Re:Good thing it wasn't email by chicoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      If I had received this in my Inbox, I probably would have ignored it. It's interesting that I'm conditioned (brainwashed?) to ignore this stuff when it's in an email, but when I read it on /. I take it seriously.

      you must be new here.

      --
      ~the keyboard is mightier than the pen.
    4. Re:Good thing it wasn't email by zarniwhoop · · Score: 1

      damned fool - unsubscribe from /. immediately, we dont want your type here!

    5. Re:Good thing it wasn't email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's my trolling account. My real account is in the 150k's

  13. Not surprising by skryche · · Score: 4, Funny

    What about the terrible GUI? That's the real crime here!

  14. Nice try, MPAA! by niceandsunny · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nuff said.

    1. Re:Nice try, MPAA! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Who said it was the MPAA?
      This came from the gaza strip.
      It could easily be a true spyware. I am guessing that not only did they have code to delete, but I would be willing to bet that they had code to grab files other than what was in the exchange directory.
      Amazing how useful closed source can be in the wrong hands.
      This is more likely a terrorist outfit than MPAA.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Nice try, MPAA! by valdis · · Score: 1

      That's what the MPAA wants you to think.

      Sure, it *says* it came from the Gaza Strip. Did you actually *verify* that? Or did you read the page, look at the WHOIS, and quit there, without doing a traceroute or anything like that?

      And even if it really DID come from there, it isn't like Palestine is so removed from civilization that there's no way to get laundered money there from southern California....

    3. Re:Nice try, MPAA! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did when it first came out and yes, it was not from USA (I think it was israel). Did not bother with whois, but somebody should have noticed by now if not from there.
      As to the owners real background, that remains a mystery. Assuming that it was MPAA or RIAA is a mistake. I would think that they would do it here in the USA or europe before going to the west bank/strip, so I highly doubt it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Nice try, MPAA! by reverius · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought the MPAA -was- a terrorist outfit.

  15. Now tell the bastards what you think! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    We'll be more than glad to hear your comments or questions at:
    Ras Kabir 121 Gaza Gaza, Palestine
    phone: +972 673 51065
    fax-no: +972 673 51065
    e-mail: ras@earthstationv.com

    For General Sales and related questions,
    contact: sales@earthstationv.com

    If you are a member of the Press,
    please contac us at: press@earthstationv.com

    For Suggestions on ways we can improve our software, please contact us at: suggestions@earthstationv.com

  16. they'll be more than glad... by fred+ugly · · Score: 5, Interesting
  17. Methods known by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, even if these guys are backstabbers (which apparently they are) they've disclosed their methods. And that should allow for a somewhat speedy recoding of a similar program that doesn't include screw_up_my_file(char* filename).

    Seriously, it was good theory, but they didn't have anything earthshattering that couldn't be replicated.

    I'll be watching for anything more that is discovered about motives. This seems to be the most curious and intriguing part of the story.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  18. Battlestations... by finalnight · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This mofos were the ones behind the summer DoS attacks on all the big BT sites, and now this. Gentlemen, start your cracking...

    1. Re:Battlestations... by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      I will leave my BT on if its attacking THEIR sites now. I love BT!

      It doesnt delete my pron.avi's.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
  19. Unconfirmed, as of yet. by caferace · · Score: 5, Informative
    This came across the FD list yesterday afternoon. Typically, an announcement of this type would elicit a fair amount of discussion. Usually at leat *one* other person would have confirmed it, or at least rebutted the claim.

    As of this writing, I haven't seen a single follow-up post.

    Is it true? I don't know, Is it a hoax? I don't know that either. It has more than a few caveats about using the exploit, that's for sure.

    What I do know is that that Geocities site with the exploit code will disappear bandwidth constrained faster than snot. :)

    1. Re:Unconfirmed, as of yet. by relyter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you may be right; this whole thing does seem a little fishy here. I myself used earthstation5 for a couple of days but deleted it after I got feed up with the slow transfer speeds and terrible interface. I have serious doubts that there are 15 million people (where do they get their numbers? - this is supposed to be completely decentralized program, with no severs)) that are simultaneously willing to put up with all the BS associated with this particular pile of stinking crap. I have since moved over to eMule and haven't been happier.
      In the event that this is legit, it would be used as fodder for the anti-P2P suits at the RIAA and MPAA to use to try and scare people from using P2P software. P2P software is far to integrated into our society (at least with the /.ers) to be shut down. The harder they work to shut them down, the more innovative the software will become to bypass their "blocks" (fake files, DoS on servers, etc.)

      The premise for E5 is cool, but the execution is flawed, perhaps some developer would like to put together a program based on the same principals that does suck or hack your box.

      Just a thought...

    2. Re:Unconfirmed, as of yet. by mkoop73 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I downloaded es5us.exe from their download page just a few minutes ago and got a completely different build number. I tried the exploit code and all of the test cases failed. I'm not even sure where that beta URL came from. I've never used E5 before, so I can't test it on an older copy -- or even validate those versions exist.

  20. just goes to show... by greendoggg · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If it looks too good to be true, then it probably is :(

  21. Based in Palestine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it common to have a software company based in palestine, or is this just some sort of untracable front that the Riaa is umploying?

    1. Re:Based in Palestine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Declaring war on the MPAA. They should have just declared it a jihad. Given their rabid sensibilities i wonder why in the hell would anyone trust software shipped out of the West Bank?

  22. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How the HELL is this redundant!?! There isn't a comment that says this so far!

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 1

      It's redundant because it is the freaking central point of the article. Thank you, Mr Obvious.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Delirium Tremens sucks my feces. Seriously, how can you drink that nasty, fruity-ass garbage?

      Perhaps you've never been introduced to good beer. Hoegaarden, Newcastle, Fat Tire, Paulaner, anything but that fucking elephant piss Tremens.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's redundant because it is the freaking central point of the article. Thank you, Mr Obvious.

      That's CAPTAIN obvious to you! (dons cape) And don't listen to mr beer snob. what kind of beer snob likes paualner? He's probably never even had a glass of chimay or maudite in his sad pathetic little life!

    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      ... or Hoegaarden, God save his poor benighted soul.

      --

      +++ATH0
  23. A complicated world by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wait a minute, I thought these guys were anti-MPAA and anti-RIAA, meaning they can only be powerful forces for good!

    Arggggghhhhh

    Binary world-view is breaking down as we speak...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:A complicated world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, the binary world isn't just 'on' and 'off', its shades of ... oh, whats that. it is just on/off... nevermind, my bad.

    2. Re:A complicated world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we just need more bits. Now I know what I can do with those new 64-bit registers!

    3. Re:A complicated world by smg_mrBlonde · · Score: 0

      these guys were anti-MPAA and anti-RIAA, meaning they can only be powerful forces for good!

      Corrupted by hatred, they were.
      To the dark side, hate leads.
      That is why they fail.

    4. Re:A complicated world by ddimas · · Score: 1
      Wait a minute, I thought these guys were anti-MPAA and anti-RIAA, meaning they can only be powerful forces for good!


      No, these guys are Anti-West.

  24. Earthstation 5 sounds like... by vudufixit · · Score: 4, Funny

    A bad UPN science fiction series.

    1. Re:Earthstation 5 sounds like... by fallingdown · · Score: 1

      No, that's Enterprise.

    2. Re:Earthstation 5 sounds like... by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

      "A bad UPN science fiction series."

      I think that's redundant. Has there ever been a GOOD UPN science fiction series?

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
    3. Re:Earthstation 5 sounds like... by The+Spie · · Score: 1

      >>Has there ever been a GOOD UPN science fiction series?

      Voyager, but only after Jeri Ryan came on the show. Isn't that Slashdot Holy Writ?

      --
      If using Linux is about choice, how come people complain when I choose to use Windows?
    4. Re:Earthstation 5 sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeri Ryan is butt-fugly. Have you ever been with a woman? Every one of my girlfriends (and even most of my one nighters) would put that dog to shame.

    5. Re:Earthstation 5 sounds like... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't.

      Many /.ers hate every trek show since Next Gen.

      I feel like DS9 was kindof ok for a little while in the middle.

      Jeri Ryan may be purdy, but you still have to listen to that patronizing constipated captain. Oooh, do you raise your eyebrows at that, Captain? How titilating!

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:Earthstation 5 sounds like... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      No, that's Enterprise.

      Which, IMHO is a heck of a lot better than "Star Trek: Voyager" ever was.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    7. Re:Earthstation 5 sounds like... by fallingdown · · Score: 1

      Which is also like saying that poop tastes better than...oh say, rancid meat.

  25. Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil alert by Badgerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tinfoil hat on . . .

    Let's say ES5 is an MPAA/RIAA front to discredit file sharing and harm filesharers.

    Now, apparently, ES5 is in Palestine.

    What better way to do "double damage" than to not only have a way to attack filesharers, but also to connect it to a location people associate with terrorism?

    OK, tinfoil hat off now.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
  26. If you use a computer by ruiner13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure everyone has at least seen one article where they tell you to NEVER install software from a company you've either never heard of, or don't trust. At this point, the internet has been around long enough that most people realize this, especially if you have data on your machine that is so important that you can't risk getting a virus or a trojan (such as this, apparently) on it. Live by the internet, die by the internet. Just because someone claims to be against the RIAA doesn't make them your friend. Just because someone is against SCO, doesn't make them about free software rights. There are such things as self-serving deeds, even if they appear to be good gestures to all.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

    1. Re:If you use a computer by fleener · · Score: 1

      >the internet has been around long enough
      > that most people realize this

      What people are you speaking of? The 50% of America that lives its life offline?

    2. Re:If you use a computer by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      NEVER install software from a company you've either never heard...

      Screws me over WRT most open source software. ...or don't trust

      And that wipes out closed source software.

    3. Re:If you use a computer by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      What do you mean with "never heard of"? Sometime is always the first...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:If you use a computer by ddimas · · Score: 1
      Live by the internet, die by the internet. Just because someone claims to be against the RIAA doesn't make them your friend. Just because someone is against SCO, doesn't make them about free software rights.

      True. They can be against those organizations for the simple reason that they want all Americans dead.

    5. Re:If you use a computer by Koatdus · · Score: 1
      I'm sure everyone has at least seen one article where they tell you to NEVER install software from a company you've either never heard of, or don't trust. At this point, the internet has been around long enough that most people realize this


      I don't know about this. Have you ever seen the windows desktop of the typical clueless user?

      In the past month I have wiped and reinstalled windows for 3 different people and their desktops were full of all kinds of things like free search bars and comet cursor, and bonzo buddies, and wall paper changers, and music downloaders, and free pop-up add blockers, and browser skinners and desktop addons and God knows what else. All of these programs are busy popping up ads and sending reports back on browsing habits and installing backdoors.

      All of these programs were installed by the user (or the users kid) who got an email or im from a friend saying.."cool program ... click here."

      The thing that gets me is the two of these computers were owned by mid level executives should know better. Home machines that were connecting into the networks of companies whose name you would recognize. (!)

      I would submit to you that your typical windows user still hasn't figured out not to install any old program that sounds neat.
      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    6. Re:If you use a computer by Snowmit · · Score: 1

      At this point, the internet has been around long enough that most people realize this, especially if you have data on your machine that is so important that you can't risk getting a virus or a trojan (such as this, apparently) on it.

      Gabe Newell being a notable exception.

      --
      I have a lot of opinions about Cyborgs and Architects
    7. Re:If you use a computer by calethix · · Score: 1

      "NEVER install software from a company you've either never heard of"

      But they were mentioned on slashdot.. I thought that meant they had a geek stamp of approval. :)

    8. Re:If you use a computer by Umrick · · Score: 1

      Nice in theory, wrong in practice. Most end users:

      1) Have never met a dialog box they didn't like well enough to hit cancel/no
      2) Have never updated their OS in their life, even though Windows Update is fairly easy to use
      3) Have no idea they should be updating AV definitions... I have AV on my computer, isn't that enough?

      If a program sounds vaguely interesting, joe schmo will download and install it to try, wether it's by MS, or jane's website on Angelfire.

    9. Re:If you use a computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I wouldn't go so far as to shout 'never' ... I have a windows box, but I don't trust Microsoft a bit ...

    10. Re:If you use a computer by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

      I'm sure everyone has at least seen one article where they tell you to NEVER install software from a company you've either never heard of, or don't trust.

      Who could possibly live by such a rule? I've got at least a hundred applications installed on my computer. They were written by almost as many companies and organizations, by thousands and thousands of developers. AND I DON'T PERSONALLY KNOW A SINGLE ONE OF THEM.

      Here's a situation from my recent experience: say you want a utility to do some graphical traceroutes for a presentation. Can you find one written by a company you "trust"? Will it be nearly as good as the one on some guys homepage? The answers are maybe and no.

      Go ahead and limit yourself, but you're really missing out.

    11. Re:If you use a computer by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

      Something tells me those people were largely unaffected by Earthstation 5.

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    12. Re:If you use a computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      years of using microsoft software has taught me to always have good backups of my data. this thing could wipe out my entire hard drive and i wouldn't care. dd if=./windows-partition.img of=/dev/hda3

  27. Dateline "Jenin, West Bank?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rest assured, brothers, your files have not been deleted; they have been martyred and are currently being serviced by 72 virgins.

    1. Re:Dateline "Jenin, West Bank?" by LittleGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Rest assured, brothers, your files have not been deleted; they have been martyred and are currently being serviced by 72 virgins.

      So, the standard Tech Support staff?

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    2. Re:Dateline "Jenin, West Bank?" by donutz · · Score: 1

      Rest assured, brothers, your files have not been deleted; they have been martyred and are currently being serviced by 72 virgins.

      Does this take inflation into account? I don't know about you, but I just don't think seventy-two virgins is quite as much as it used to be in the old days....

    3. Re:Dateline "Jenin, West Bank?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's more. After the "sexual revolution" nobody claims to be a virgin anymore. I'm surprised they can find 72.

    4. Re:Dateline "Jenin, West Bank?" by aelfwyne · · Score: 1

      Yeah.... 72 virgins.... well thats enough for a few days maybe, but after that you're virgin-less... is that part of this program's scheme?

      --
      -- If it ain't broke - overclock it more.
    5. Re:Dateline "Jenin, West Bank?" by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Oh no... it's a trick, it's really hell.

      You see, you get 72 virgins... and they stay that way.

      "Hey, these bottles of beer have no holes in them!" "Yep, neither do the women."

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    6. Re:Dateline "Jenin, West Bank?" by SlashSnot · · Score: 1

      dude! Do you have pictures? I will gladly sacrifice a few readme.txt's for some virgins... Grabbing another glass of the gatorade, or whatever, waiting for your response.

  28. Also look out for these P2P programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Deep Space 9
    Babylon 5
    The Dagobah System

    1. Re:Also look out for these P2P programs... by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

      Nah, they won't get away with that again. Better off tracking the company directors instead - Zaphod Beebelbrox is quite a rare name.

    2. Re:Also look out for these P2P programs... by scottcha+4 · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the Jupiter 2.

      --
      Sanity is overrated...Being CRAZY is much more fun!!!
    3. Re:Also look out for these P2P programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      id agree, but unless someone wishes to voyage to the resturant at the end of the universe, i dont think were gonna meet up with him again any time soon...

    4. Re:Also look out for these P2P programs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, relax. They're mostly harmless.

      So long.

  29. Can you say ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'll be watching for anything more that is discovered about motives. This seems to be the most curious and intriguing part of the story.
    honeypot?
  30. now I know why my computer has been complaining by dnotj · · Score: 2, Funny

    About a missing file: /home/dnotj/.wine/fake_windows/boot.ini

    --
    No more Micro$oft bashing from me. Its like bashing at the special olympics.
  31. They aren't fighting the RIAA... by SwansonMarpalum · · Score: 1

    They're in cohoots! In exchange for providing a backdoor for the RIAA to delete illegal MP3s off your computer, they each got a new copy of 's CD!

    --
    "Give away the stone, let the oceans take and transmutate this cold and faded anchor." - Maynard James Keenan
    1. Re:They aren't fighting the RIAA... by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 1
      They're in cohoots! In exchange for providing a backdoor for the RIAA to delete illegal MP3s off your computer, they each got a new copy of 's CD!

      Unfortunately, the CDs were copy protected, and won't work in their computers, car stereos, or portable cd players...

  32. Not a buffer overflow? by Durzel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm curious - how can it be determined without the benefit of source code for ES5 that the exploit isn't just a horrendous oversight instead of a malicious pre-meditated function of the software?

    If it is malicious it seems odd that they would make it possible for ANYONE to delete someone elses files through crafted search strings, thus significantly increasing the chance of their nefarious plans being uncovered.

    If it were me, and I was secretly working for the RIAA, I'd just code in a simple client/server protocol that the RIAA could use to delete people's files, entirely seperate from the normal operation of the program itself. This would be much harder to identify as malicious code.

    Sorry, but this just looks to me like a bad "failure to chroot()" bug and not the big conspiracy theory its purported to be...

    1. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by godzillion · · Score: 1

      Yes. Looks more like a terrible security oversight than a deliberate backdoor. I am not convinced by:

      "IMPORTANT: This is not a bug! They intentionally added this code to ES5."

      as much as the author would have me be.

    2. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Do you even understand the concept of buffer overflows? A one packet delete command to a service that regularly handle multi-packet search requests is not a buffer overflow - it is intentional.

    3. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by scambaiter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, the conclusion simply says that they dont know what the use for some special "delete file" command could be and add the MPAA/RIAA story as a theory.

      I dont think that its simply something like a missing chroot() bug, i cant think of any good reason why you would have "delete file" command implemented in a P2P client... Fellow slashdotters, anyone got an idea why one would implement this?

      --
      sick of sigs... *sigh*
    4. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I'm curious - how can it be determined without the benefit of source code for ES5 that the exploit isn't just a horrendous oversight instead of a malicious pre-meditated function of the software?"

      Even in assembler its not too hard to see when an operation is a bug resulting from jumping to a bit
      of code when some unexpected events coincide and jumping to the same bit of code when a SPECIFIC packet arrives.

    5. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, so users can delete a file from inside the P2P program?

      Duh.

    6. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by krumms · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm curious - how can it be determined without the benefit of source code for ES5 that the exploit isn't just a horrendous oversight instead of a malicious pre-meditated function of the software?

      Well, I'm curious - what more proof do you want?

      The FD post made it clear that a particular function of the ES5 software ("0Ch, sub-function 07h") caused the behaviour. That's a completely separate function that seems to have the sole purpose of deleting files remotely. The likelyhood of such code ever getting near the network/command interpreter accidentally is rather slim.

      Maybe if it occurred as part of another function I could believe it was accidental, but not when it's on its own. If that makes any sense ;)

      While I too disagree with the 'conspiracy theory' story behind all this, it seems to me from the information given that they've got blood on their hands.

    7. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by dtrent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having worked at a small software company, I'll speculate.

      This could have been added as an "internal" feature and forgotten about it. It could have been added by one un-professional programmer, unbeknownst to the rest of the group. It could be in there on purpose, and the team is naive enough to believe it'll never get abused. It could be in there on purpose because they want it there and they don't care about the ramifications. And finally, it could be there because they have plans to use it some day to cause havoc.

      My bet is the on one of the first two, but I wouldn't rule out any of them.

    8. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by Cecil · · Score: 1

      If it were me, and I was secretly working for the RIAA, I'd just code in a simple client/server protocol that the RIAA could use to delete people's files, entirely seperate from the normal operation of the program itself. This would be much harder to identify as malicious code.

      Yeah, that's a good idea you have there. Obviously these guys are amateurs. No security expert ever notices when a program opens a second connection completely unrelated to the operation of the program. If they had done that they would be golden. That sort of thing is so rare that they don't even have a name for it, like they do for things like trojans. ... Oh, wait.

    9. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Um, so users can delete a file from inside the P2P program?

      If you're writing a routine to let the user delete files, you don't hook it up to the network command-parsing routines.

      Duh.

    10. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so users can delete a file from inside the P2P program on other peoples boxen? aaah... you mean if you want to delete a local file you send that command to the whole p2p network and when it comes back to you the file gets deleted by your client? clever;)

    11. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by cduffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're obviously not a coder.

      A buffer overflow involves, guess it, overflowing a buffer. Putting a different byte in the command field of a packet -- without any changes in length -- is absolutely not a buffer overflow.

      Jumping to a delete routine based on what's in that byte is not a "deliberate mistake".

      As nice as it would be to do a bit of wishful thinking -- as a professional coder, I can state this behaviour was clearly intentionally added.

    12. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by godzillion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Including a remote file deletion in the protocol is only part of the problem, though, and that's obviously intentional. The really dangerous part is that you can tell a remote computer to delete a file on a relative path including "../../../", wiping out (unshared) files from the arbitrary directories on the machine.

      Sounds to me more like somebody forgot to check for "." at the beginning of the deletion path. If you can delete arbitrary files in this way, it would seem likely that you can retrieve arbitrary (not intentionally shared) files, too.

    13. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by scambaiter · · Score: 1

      well... its not about a general delete function, but a delete function that gets executed when it receives a message from the network. You would expect streaming to work more like telling the client that it finally got the whole file and then have the client handle the clean-up instead of telling the client to delete some file.

      --
      sick of sigs... *sigh*
    14. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by Tom7 · · Score: 1

      how can it be determined

      You could look at the (assembly) code, watching it parse your packet. Suppose there's some switch on the 'message type' field (or whatever), and one of the branches calls a function that calls unlink on the packet's payload. How could that be a bug? ... entirely seperate from the normal operation of the program itself. This would be much harder to identify as malicious code.

      What? Another port open? A totally different, (typically) unused branch in the protocol's parser? I'd say those are pretty hard to identify as malicious.

      I agree, though: it seems strange to make the deletion method so straightforward.

    15. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds to me more like somebody forgot to check for "." at the beginning of the deletion path.

      Not good enough; if there is a subdirectory "shares" then you could always delete from shares/../../../windows/explorer.exe, etc.

    16. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'll agree that that part is almost certainly a bug.

    17. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Perhaps an os.path.realpath() call combined with a strncmp?

      (Yes, I know the C standard library doesn't have realpath; it's from Python, but the base implementation is C. Apache, IIRC, also has similar code. The advantage of this over simply outlawing "." or ".." altogether is that it also prevents escape from the shared tree via symlinks).

    18. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's a specific symbol in the protocol that indicates "delete this file," I sincerely doubt it was an accident. It's certainly possible that it was intended for more benign things, as the authors don't seem to be the world's foremost experts on security. Regardless, I'd stay the hell away from it.

    19. Re:Not a buffer overflow? by godzillion · · Score: 1

      Not good enough; if there is a subdirectory "shares" then you could always delete from shares/../../../windows/explorer.exe, etc.

      That's okay. With my mad coding skillz, I'm sure to pass the EarthStation's developer prescreening anyway! Just watch me code Pascal's triangle! Ooh, and reverse the words in a sentence! Let me at 'em!

  33. malware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have this problem, I use Linux.

    1. Re:malware? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the real question is would you have, had the realised it on Linux?
      It would have been closed source, but a "secured" program. Would you have downloaded this program? Quite possibly. Would you have chrooted it to make it secure? probably not?
      WOuld you have cared that it came from an enemies (al qaeda) stronghold and noticed that this is more likely to be a spying tool and not mpaa/riaa tool? not likely.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:malware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the obligatory ", you insensitive clod!"

      Hope that helps!

    3. Re:malware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your media has seriously clouded your brain. Hamas = Palestinian, not Al Qaeda.
      Al Qaeda is the 'enemy' of the USA apparently, Hamas just wants it's stolen land back. I don't think they're an enemy stronghold. How could they be when they go up against tanks and apache helicopters by blowing themselves up and throwing rocks. I think you need to watch less TV.

      On the other hand the website appears to be hosted in Israel, so it's likely a bunch of bored Israeli kids trying to discredit Palestinians and get some DDoS platforms.

    4. Re:malware? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Hamas = Palestinian, not Al Qaeda ...
      Al Qaeda is the 'enemy' of the USA apparently, Hamas just wants it's stolen land back.

      Al Qaeda is working in that area as well. To be honest, it is mostly Hamas.
      But if it was hamas, then they would have released many different languages and would include hebrew and arabic from the git-go.
      Instead, the mostly hit European languages; Russian, English, Spanish, Turkey, German, Chinese, Japanese, Chezk, and French.
      And yes, it could just be a bunch of kids, but with a web site like that requires a lot of money.
      So no, the media has not clouded the mind, nor the logic.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  34. Quick to criticise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why so quick to criticise? The posting referred to in the article says "This is not a bug" and that the feature was deliberately added? How could they possibly know this? Nobody but the coders of ES5 could know what their true intentions were. I don't see any mention of their coders coming clean in the posting.

    Personally, I'll uninstall as it's a bug not worth risking time with, but I'll certainly be waiting for the response from ES5.

  35. Re:BAH! THIS IS JUST FUD by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um.... $2.00 doesn't cover the hardware costs of producing a professional cd. If your requests are unresonable, don't be surprised when they're not met.

    On the other side of that, $16-20 is unreasonable. $10 would be fair, I think. Considering the hours spent in the studio recording, AFM scale per musician per song being $50 (and that's for low grade musicians), the cost of a decent engineer, cost of using a decent studio (that's not cheap), mastering costs... Then you've got to either spend $$ on an expensive fast cd dup'er, or pay someone to burn 10,000 cd's in a week, artwork for the j-page, printing of the j-page, cd cases, shringwrapping, a UPC, distribution, etc....

    Do you honestly think all of that can be done for $2.00 per? Get real.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  36. IT'S A TRAP! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It sounds interesting - any /.ers try the exploit out yet?

    The first place I heard about E5 was on Slashdot, in a sig - I thought about trying it out, but something didn't seem quite right.

    Too much flash and cash on the website, and sweeping claims that hadn't made it elsewhere turned me off.

    I'm thinking it's the same 'spidey sense' that goes off when I get an email with an evil attachment.

  37. MY WINDOWS HAS THIS CODE IMPLEMENTED IN IT'S CORE by cies · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    MY WINDOWS HAS THIS CODE IMPLEMENTED IN IT'S CORE!

    since the program only runs on windows, this "feature" is not as original as it seems...

    cheers,
    cies.

  38. Verify the presence of malware by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny
    $ grep "rm" ~/W4R3Z/es5
    Binary file ~/W4R3Z/es5 matches
    $
    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    1. Re:Verify the presence of malware by asquared256 · · Score: 1


      $ grep "rm" /bin/cat
      Binary file /bin/cat matches
      $


      Does that make /bin/cat malware too?

    2. Re:Verify the presence of malware by Eucaryont · · Score: 1
      [OT] Nice sig, love the explanation on the architecture page:
      'Numbers that big are hard to get your head around, but you could compare 32-bit processing to a glass of water, and 64-bit processing to the Niagara falls.'

      What the flaming f*** is that supposed to mean?

  39. Do people think before they download? by Damon+C.+Richardson · · Score: 1

    To think someone downloaded software from a company in Palestine..... Hmmm... Has anyone told bush and ashcroft about this? This could be a terrorist plot!

    --

    Last one in jail is a fascist.
    1. Re:Do people think before they download? by smhguy · · Score: 1

      ICQ was an Israeli company before AOL bought 'em...

  40. Re:BAH! THIS IS JUST FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm.... bad english, "death to the RIAA/MPAA" elitism, swearing, encouragement of piracy, and unsubstantiated claims that ES5 is safe. You don't happen to work for ES5, do you?

  41. Re:Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil ale by adam613 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Now, apparently, ES5 is in Palestine.

    They're probably going to claim the code was inserted by the Israeli army or something.

  42. Anagram conspiracy theory by mblase · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did you know that you can rearrange the letters of "EARTHSTATION FIVE" to spell "RIAA VOTES IN THEFT"?

    They're behind the whole thing, I'm telling you.

    1. Re:Anagram conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? All I can get is "SETECH ASTRONOMY"

    2. Re:Anagram conspiracy theory by ryan76 · · Score: 1

      You can also rearrange the letters and get "YOU ALL ARE FREAKING CRAZY". Seriously, if Earthstation 5 has three times as many users how come everyone has not heard of it?

      --
      http://threetechguys.info Come, discuss Technology. Got a technology question? Come ask!
    3. Re:Anagram conspiracy theory by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      COOTYS RAT SEMEN

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    4. Re:Anagram conspiracy theory by Dogun · · Score: 1

      No, you fools! Clearly the correct arrangement of letters is: "RIAA STONES VI THEFT!"

    5. Re:Anagram conspiracy theory by bpd1069 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did you know that you can rearrange the letters of "EARTHSTATION FIVE" to spell "RIAA VOTES IN THEFT"?


      I also found "SEVENTH TIT OF RIAA"

      We all know the RIAA is a bitch, but this just proves it...

      --
      --
    6. Re:Anagram conspiracy theory by linzeal · · Score: 1
      He knows too much!

      He knows too much!

      All praise the poisoned tit of hillary !!

  43. Heres the trojan code by ghost1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Link to Zeropaid discussion with the actual code http://www.zeropaid.com/news/articles/auto/1002200 3i.php

  44. Re:MY WINDOWS HAS THIS CODE IMPLEMENTED IN IT'S CO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    idiot.

  45. ...or a brilliant MPAA/RIAA tactic by LilJC · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Release excellent mother-of-them-all P2P software under guise of legitimate software
    2. Once everyone has it, delete all pirated files
    3. Profit!

    I half wish they'd actually do that - maybe it would incite a full boycott. Though I am happy with the understanding that their sales are declining already.

    --

    The only thing more dangerous than a file named -rf is renaming it -rf\ /
    1. Re:...or a brilliant MPAA/RIAA tactic by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't put it past them. They could even "seed" the network with tons of good copyrighted music/movies to lure people in. I wonder if they did that would that make those copyrighted materials now public domain?

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    2. Re:...or a brilliant MPAA/RIAA tactic by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see, RIAA/MPAA been lobbying (unsuccessfully) to get laws passed to permit them to do exactly this. Probably they think they have some kind of legal loophole because the user installs it themselves.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
  46. Parent is a TROLL by jbottero · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Read the parent post closely. It's a troll.

    1. Re:Parent is a TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, you're right. I'm glad to see the rise in subtle trolling around this place, even if we do have to do it as AC's.

  47. Re:BAH! THIS IS JUST FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Please welcome the lead programmer for ES5!!

    Thanks for stopping by!

    Let me summarize you're argument,

    "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, keep using the app, there is no bad code, keep leeching!"

    right... nice try.

  48. Mod Parent Jackass Down by goldspider · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "BUt as long as they try and gouge us for their crap, we'll gouge right back and take what's ours.

    I cordially invite you to shut your pie-hole. It's crap like that that makes the rest of us look like irrational frothing anti-capitalist lunatics, and invites the likes of the RIAA/MPAA to treat us as such.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Mod Parent Jackass Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      irrational frothing anti-capitalist lunatics

      I can see from your ID that you are relatively new here.

    2. Re:Mod Parent Jackass Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I am a frothing anti-capitalist "lunatic". Although I take issue with your sentiment that I am irrational. Capitalism just doesn't work. Right now every citizen in capitalist countries is a slave. If they want to live the life that's being sold to them, they have to buy it. Every bit. There is no system in place to provide people with even a basic subsistence level of existence if they don't want to be part of the capitalist system. Your easy reply is usually "then leave and go to some commie/socialist country and see how much your life sucks" response will not help. If capitalism is so good, then does that mean that it's proponents have no problem with the idea that people who are not capable or have no desire to participate in the system should be forced to live in poverty and eventually die? As a human being, I take great offense to that and state that capitalism is nice, but it's no better than communism. And with the way capitalism has been destroyed by the United State, it's really approaching the levels of hypocrisy that communism had only in a worse way. At least under communist rule, the citizens were aware they were being lied to. Under American capitalist rule, you are all deluded into thinking you have it good because you have a computer a nice house an SUV, etc... But one little piece falls out of your house of cards and it's all gone with no support system under you. So yes, I am anti-capitalist as well I should be. And so should every true American. Capitalism has failed the citizenry.

  49. You actually bought into ES5? by winkydink · · Score: 0, Troll

    Please tell me you are joking. Are you that naive?

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  50. Whois by Xerxes2695 · · Score: 2, Funny

    www.es5.com is regestered to (get this)

    Earthstationv Ltd., A Palestinian Corporation
    Jenin refugee camp #23
    Jenin (PS)

    Rfugee camp? Palestine? Unless they lied on the registration I doubt this is RIAA.

    1. Re:Whois by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

      Someone lied in their registration? My GOSH, what is the world coming to!!!?!?!?!

    2. Re:Whois by valdis · · Score: 1

      an upstanding organization like the RIAA *LIE* to us? Never.. No.. Say it ain't so.....

    3. Re:Whois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah ? then how come it traceroutes to forward.net.il ? Anyone can fill in garbage domain details.

    4. Re:Whois by Xerxes2695 · · Score: 1

      A traceroute using VisualRoute 7.3b produces a destination somewhere near Isreal after a stopover in london. Is VisualRoute reliable? Did they fool it with malformed packets?

    5. Re:Whois by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Unless they lied on the registration I doubt this is RIAA.

      Yeah, boy, wow. It's really, really tough to fake WHOIS info. You'd have to be a genius to do that (note sarcasm).

  51. Blimey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, I was foolish enough to have installed ES5, and now that I try to uninstall it, it won't all go away. All of the DLLs can't be deleted, I'm guessing because they're currently in use. Curses!

    1. Re:Blimey! by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Sure you can.

      Boot into safe mode, attrib the files with -a -s -r and delete at will.

      You might also look at using System Restore, assuming you're using XP.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  52. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, that IS an interesting point... A little overreacting IMO. I feel if they had any shred of intelligence, they wouldn't nuke the computers at first; first they'd steal all the info on the targets computers, then try to distribute their "program" further, as a worm would, and maybe after a certain amount of time nuke the machine, if at all. It's more valuable to have the computer owned, as is shown to anyone with a shred of intelligence by worms like Slammer, MSBlaster, et. al.

    If they do that, they must REALLY hate us. Well, I suppose that's what we get when we support the bullies... The victims tend to get angry at the man hiding in the shadows. It's really quite depressing. If we continue supporting Israel, looks like there will eventually be genocide. The hate will grow to such a level, that both sides will never rest until the other side is completely destroyed. Nobody wants that, but it looks like our options are pretty limited. At this point, I don't see how these two ancient peoples can live side-by-side in peace. It would literally take a miracle.

    1. Re:Hmm by Geckoone · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually, I wouldn't mind seeing the eradication of all muslims from the planet. World peace would be right around the corner from that.

      --
      stupid people suck
    2. Re:Hmm by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > the eradication of all muslims from the planet. World peace would be right around the corner

      Maybe if you included all the Christians too. And the Satanists of course. Oh, and the atheists. And I guess there are some violent agnostics also. I don't think the Buddhists need eradicating, in general, but there might be some Hindi.

      A better solution is for you to kill yourself so you don't have to worry about it any more. If everyone like you followed that example, sure, peace would be right around the corner. Might be a pretty long block, though.

  53. where... by Spetiam · · Score: 1

    did he get the source from? that's what i want to know.

    1. Re:where... by Silverfuel · · Score: 1, Funny

      he downloaded the source from the SCO website.

    2. Re:where... by fstanchina · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but what source? The exploit's (which he presumably wrote himself) or EartStation 5's (which he doesn't have, or at least he doesn't say he does)?

      Maybe you're under the mistaken impression that someone needs source code to find bugs and/or backdoors in an application. Never heard of reverse engineering? 8-)

  54. Re:Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil ale by Zocalo · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'd go for the same thing, but this seems a little bit beyond the RIAA/MPAA's usual demonstated technical level. The registrant data on the domains and the IP block data submitted by their upstream ISP (SpeedNet) tallies, and the IPs *are* in Israel. It might be bonafide in that I doubt very much that the RIAA/MPAA are going to have much legal sway in Palestine, but the thing just smacks of blatant scam to sucker in the terminally dense to me; *far* too good to be true.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  55. Re:Now tell the bastards what you think! by nucal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This WHOIS just looks incredibly fake to me ...

    earthstation5.com Back-order this name

    Domain EARTHSTATION5.COM

    Date Registered: 2/26/2002
    Date Modified: 6/13/2002
    Expiry Date: 2005-2-26
    DNS1: ns1.earthstationv.com
    DNS2: ns2.earthstationv.com
    Registrant

    Earthstationv Ltd, A Palestinian Corporation
    Jenin refugee camp #23
    Jenin (PS)
    NONE

    Administrative Contact

    EarthstationV Ltd., A Palestinian Corporation
    Mr Domain Administrator
    Jenin refugee camp #23
    Jenin (PS)
    NONE
    067351065
    67351065
    ras@earthstationv.com
    Technical Contact
    EarthstationV Ltd., A Palestinian Corporation
    Mr Domain Administrator
    Jenin refugee camp #23
    Jenin (PS)
    NONE
    067351065
    67351065
    ras@earthstationv.com
    Registrar: NameScout.com

  56. Re:BAH! THIS IS JUST FUD by RevMike · · Score: 1
    On the other side of that, $16-20 is unreasonable. $10 would be fair, I think.

    I'd maybe even go a little lower, perhaps to $8.00. I doubt that any cost in the cycle is more than that for producing a cassette tape.

    What really gets my goat is that the price of a new release CD has never dropped. I remember in 1985 or so when the format was just getting traction the prices would be high. All the equipment was new and had to be paid for, people weren't sure it would be accepted, etc. So it cost about $16 for a new cd. AND IT NEVER CHANGED even after all the new cd pressing equipment was paid for. Even as the manufacturing cost per unit dropped through the floor. It never even dropped to the $12 price of a new LP.

  57. Amazement... by acousticiris · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed at how many *truly technically savvy people* I work with just randomly install p2p apps and then are surprised that they have holes, bugs and even Malware.
    I mean, really, if networked applications that are *supposed* to be bullet proof like OpenSSH encounter vulnerabilities--in an open source environment--with so many people reviewing the actual code, can we be too surprised that some silly P2P application with authors who make no bones about the fact that they are violating (albiet bad) American laws might slip something like this in intentionally?
    Even if there was no intention to slip this code in there (which I find hard to believe in this case), the idea that there would be Buffer Overflow vulnerabilities and the like doesn't surprise me one bit.
    Most people don't take security seriously...even those who you would expect to.

    --
    "God is dead!" - Nietzsche
    "Nietzsche is dead!" - God
  58. What's the big deal? by Giant+Ape+Skeleton · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's not a bug, it's a *feature* !

    ;-)

    --
    The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.
  59. where's the money? by heh2k · · Score: 1

    can someone tell me how they planned to make money? let's see: give away sw, give away movies. i must be missing something.

    1. Re:where's the money? by maharg · · Score: 1

      Streaming Sex Channels for Adults
      from http://www.earthstation5.com/homeweb.html

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    2. Re:where's the money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Create new P2P app
      2. Hide Devious back door in P2P app
      3. Sell secret to MPAA and RIAA
      4. Deny all claims this ever happend
      5. ???
      6. Profit!

  60. Re:Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil ale by abb3w · · Score: 1

    Re-donning the tinfoil...

    Well, thinking about it-- it wouldn't be a bad terrorist plan. Create a popular application with a popular primary function (such as P2P file sharing). Build in a set of secret secondary functions, that allow things like DDOS, file deletion, server crashing, and other fun things. Let it get popular enough that it becomes common -- say, 10% of Windows users. The unleash your slave army on your targets in an attempt to destroy modern western society. It would be inconvenient trying to run our present society if Windows machines all went kablooey at once...

    Possible, but unlikely.

    Tinfoil back off...

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  61. It could happen with any closed source software.. by pirhana · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a good example which shows again and again that any closed source is inherently not trustable. When you are installing a proprietory software, you are basically trusting them not to screw you up or put any back door. Nobody has any guaranty that windows or any other closed source software is free of this issue. Safe bet is to stick with open source software exclusively.

  62. Earthstation 5 Lite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can somone make an "Earthstation 5 Lite" version of this, similar to Kazaa Lite (err. K++)?

  63. Finally, something I know about... by wingnut2600 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I heard about this yesterday from a posting by Random Nut (the individual that discovered this exploit as well as earlier security holes in Kazaa) on Zeropaid.com (forum link: http://www.zeropaid.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=15259 ).

    The security exploit is being tested by members of the p2p community and has been shown to be a viable exploit (forum link: http://www.p2pforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=20323#203 23)

    The operators of ESV have been slow to directly answer questions regarding this exploit:(http://forums2.es5.com/index.php?act=ST&f =40&t=5645&s=1ec6bf29bb73061ed185cbc3018f04b8) . Registration required to view forums, but it is worth it! The ESV forums are interesting since they make allegations of other site's involvement with the RIAA, MPAA, etc. yet have included a questionable exploit in their own software. These forums are rife with rhetoric and double-talk of Orwellian proportions.

  64. Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Funny

    People need to stop trashing Earthstation 5. It's a fantastic program, and does exactly as advertised. Plus, it seems to have built-in compression software -- my free disk space has been steadily increasing ever since I installed it!

    1. Re:Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by Broodje · · Score: 0

      Bah a cheapo $9/mo 50gb usenet feed does as advertised and you don't have to install any proprietary software on any specific OS.

    2. Re:Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And where can you get such a feed for such a low cost?

    3. Re:Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by Broodje · · Score: 2, Informative

      clicky for instance. ok ok, $9.95/mo :)

    4. Re:Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    5. Re:Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, may be your free disk space is increasing because someone was deleting stuff...

    6. Re:Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by loosewing · · Score: 0

      I think that people who trash this program need to get a grip. What a bunch of Wussies...

      I mean how bad can su...[[No Carrier]]

      [disk error]

      [disk error]

      [disk error]

    7. Re:Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you go to the Alanis Morrisette school of irony?

    8. Re:Earthstation 5 is a GODSEND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you think so, Einstein? Hey, maybe in a year or two you'll also figure out that HE WAS JOKING? What's your IQ, 105?

  65. where did the source come from? by Spetiam · · Score: 1

    was it reverse engineered, or what?

    1. Re:where did the source come from? by saddino · · Score: 1

      The source code is for a program to test/prove the vulnerability in ES5...it is not the source code to ES5.

    2. Re:where did the source come from? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      Typical procedure in a case like this is to disassemble the program you're analyzing (and so get assembly code source) and then to write an exploit in whatever language you're comfortable in (in this case C++, bah).

      So... the source here was written by the guy who found the exploit, presumably based on a disassembled copy of the program. Does that explain things adequately?

  66. Failsafe hypothesis [and a another foil hat :)] by DingoBueno · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scenario 1:
    Maybe this is not malicious. Possibly a way to protect people in the event that something bad happens, like all this hyped anonymity and encryption turns out to be trivial to crack. ES5 may have already developed a worm that spreads and exploits this function to delete all shared files on the network, which may be in the users' best interests.

    Scenario 2 (aka Conspiracy theory 1):
    Orrin Hatch is making good on his promise to destroy the PCs of filesharers around the world, while placing the blame on Palestine.

    I like the #2 better, but you decide for yourself :)

    Later...

    --
    ascii art
    1. Re:Failsafe hypothesis [and a another foil hat :)] by JayBlalock · · Score: 1

      (snicker) While I actually think a "Failsafe" option wouldn't be a bad idea at all, for some reason your post made me imagine Dr. Strangelove as interpreted by a group of l33t d00dz.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
  67. Well.. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ..since I never could get it to work, I'd uninstalled it a LONG time ago.

    I *did* notice one thing about KaZaA Lite however (not bullshitting):

    I've got four systems on my network at home. One of the two on my desk is running KaZaA Lite. All the boxes have software firewalls installed in addition to my LinkSys NAT firewall/switch.

    The other day, my primary machine's firewall displays a warning regarding an out-bound connection attempt from that box.

    This box wasn't running KaZaA Lite. Nor is it installed on this system. Anyone else see anything like this?

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:Well.. by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      I *did* notice one thing about KaZaA Lite however (not bullshitting)....The other day, my primary machine's firewall displays a warning regarding an out-bound connection attempt from that box. This box wasn't running KaZaA Lite. Nor is it installed on this system

      Well, if Kazaalite isn't on that machine, then Kazaalite must be the culprit trying to initiate an outgoing connection right??? There can't be anything else on that machine trying to make outbound connections right??? Nooooooo, of course not....

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    2. Re:Well.. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Well, if Kazaalite isn't on that machine, then Kazaalite must be the culprit trying to initiate an outgoing connection right??? There can't be anything else on that machine trying to make outbound connections right??? Nooooooo, of course not....

      Precisely. There are NO P2P apps on the box where the pop-up appeared.

      Not a single one. That's what the other box is for.

      Which is why it struck me as odd. There'd be no reason for the pop-up to appear on that system.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    3. Re:Well.. by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      thats my point!!!!!

      it's not Kazaa that did it...something else did

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    4. Re:Well.. by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it was labeled as Kazaa's executible and on kazaa's out-bound port.

      Yes, I know both of these don't undoubtedly equal Kazaa, but not of the spyware catchers I've used have otherwise reported anything as being amiss.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  68. Re:SHUT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ACs don't get karma hits, you dumb fuck. Neither to +x Funny mods

  69. I for one... by halo1982 · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new porn deleting overlords!

    1. Re:I for one... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      Those are MP3 and DivX deleting overlords, you insensitive clod!

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  70. Re:BAH! THIS IS JUST FUD by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're too right about the price staying where it is. And having been a recording artist, I can say that a run of a brick of CD's (1000) costs about $4 per when you want it to be nice and professional. That's just the material costs. Also, there's a $0.015 (unfairly low.. they haven't had a raise since the 50's) per song fee to songwriters, the artist generally get's close to $1 per cd sold (that's fair I think). The rest goes to the label for all their "hard work."

    For expected gold-platinum cd's, $8 is probably fair, but for those that are only selling 1k-10k, that might be a stretch. Of course, you could argue that they should be selling for that, maybe breaking even, just to get their music into the hands of the public, who will pay to see them live.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  71. Re:Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil ale by IckySplat · · Score: 1

    Ummmm I though that going kablooey all at once
    was something that windows did all the time.

    --
    Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
  72. Re:Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil ale by angle_mark · · Score: 1

    It would be inconvenient trying to run our present society if Windows machines all went kablooey at once...

    Well if that's their motivation then they're behind the times. We all know windows already has that functionality built in.

  73. nice try MPAA bitches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I new there was something HIGHLY suspicous about a company launched in the fucking WEST BANK.

    As someone who watches the middle east closely I can tell you the last thing the Palestinians give a fuck about is the MPAA and pirating movies.

    I knew there was something seriously phoney about that from the start.

    Trying to discredit P2P and the Palestinians at the same time, pretty cute.

    Fuckers.

  74. Who benefits by phorm · · Score: 1

    Who benefits from deleting the hard-drives of music swappers? I hate to go all conspiracy theory, but I really can't think of anyone other than the RIAA/MPAA who would find use in baiting mp3 traders with a new "safe" trading system, only to have it begin nuking their computers...

    1. Re:Who benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how much of a threat is this really? Who's going to figure out that I keep my most important non-backed up files in c:\resource\luscious\important\files\nobackup\?

    2. Re:Who benefits by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 0, Redundant
      "I really can't think of anyone other than the RIAA/MPAA who would find use in baiting mp3 traders with a new "safe" trading system, only to have it begin nuking their computers..."

      How many destructive viruses, worms, and trojans have been written prior to the RIAA and MPAA getting upset at online copyright infringement? There're lots of people who'll be destructive just for the sake of being destructive, and a "safe" file trading system is a pretty obvious way for someone who wants to be destructive to sucker lots of people into running their code.

    3. Re:Who benefits by phorm · · Score: 1

      Worms, trojans, etc don't often come as software that is toted out on major geek websites with file-deleting functionality built in. I would expect to find them in my inbox, but not on a popular geeksite or an oft-visited website - at least not without some form of profiteering in them (and file deletion functionality hardly seems profitable).

  75. Let's be logical about it by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 1

    If Intellectual Property theft isn't really theft because IP isn't really property, then Intellectual Property damage isn't really damage because IP isn't really property.

    If you really feel that IP ownership is bogus then this malware isn't really a problem because at worst it only destroys your Intellectual Property and not anything of real value. So, anybody who takes this off their computer doesn't really believe that IP doesn't have actual value and thus admits that IP theft really is theft.

    1. Re:Let's be logical about it by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stealing a book from a library == theft.

      Photocopying the same book ==copyright infringement != theft.

      Burning the book == damage.

      See how simple logic is when you're not trolling

    2. Re:Let's be logical about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Destroying your photocopy of the book is a more apt analogy.

      See how simple logic is when you actually try? (Dumbshit.)

    3. Re:Let's be logical about it by (void*) · · Score: 1
      If copyright violation isn't really theft, then IP isn't really property ...

      That's a complete non-sequitor. And there goes your argument. Meanwhile, for those of us who notice that copyright violation isn't theft, that property remains property, that intellectual property is misnamed, we are not confused, and can get on with arguing about real issues like: how much and how shall we enforce intellectual property rights?

      Grow up and stop trolling.

    4. Re:Let's be logical about it by TheAncientHacker · · Score: 1

      If, as your argument requires, the IP has no inherent value then erasing the book (or, say, replacing a looseleaf version's pages with blank paper) would not be damage since nothing of value was changed and the same would apply to the hard drive.

    5. Re:Let's be logical about it by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 1

      Newsflash! Books and computer files do not contain intellectual property they contain information. Intelectual property is a legal fiction and refers to the rights to use and or distribute information or knowledge. It is the copyright itself which is intelectual property not the material to which the copyright refers. As for inherent value, here is a piece of information you are talking crap, you might find that piece of information valuable, and it will not lose its value just because others also know you are talking crap. However if you lose sight of the fact that you are talking crap you will have lost something of value, although you will not of lost any intellectual property.

    6. Re:Let's be logical about it by Alsee · · Score: 1

      If Intellectual Property theft isn't really theft because IP isn't really property, then Intellectual Property damage isn't really damage because IP isn't really property.
      So, anybody who takes this off their computer doesn't really believe that IP doesn't have actual value and thus admits that IP theft really is theft.


      Bogus argument. If someone wipes my hard drive is certainly is NOT theft as you are suggesting, it is vandalism. My data is stored on my property, and not only do I have a legal right to possess my property, I have a legally protected right not to have anyone disrupt the state or arrangement of my property. If I have an angel and bunny rabbits painted on my front door it is illegal vandalism for you to rearrange the paint into a stripper and demons without my permission. And if I painted a stripper and demons on my front door it would be illegal vandalism for you to rearrange the paint into an angel and bunny rabbits.

      Copyright infringment is not theft. If you insist on claiming it is I suggest you go argue with the US supreme court about it:

      Dowling v. United States, 473 U.S. 207 (1985)

      the rights of a copyright holder are `different' from the rights of owners of other kinds of property

      the copyright holder owns only a bundle of intangible rights which can be infringed, but not stolen or converted

      It follows that interference with copyright does not easily equate with theft, conversion or fraud. The Copyright Act even employs a separate term of art to define one who misappropriates a copyright: 'Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner,' that is, anyone who trespasses into his exclusive domain by using or authorizing the use of the copyrighted work in one of the five ways set forth in the statute, 'is an infringer of the copyright.'


      Proper copyright law is a good thing, but current copyright law has grown like a cancer into areas it was never intended to apply. Our current copyright law is an abomination.

      I repeat, proper copyright law is a good thing. We used to have good copyright law. Unfortunately the copyright lobby has spent 200-odd years constanyly lobbing to expand copyright, and congress forgot the original intent of copyright, and no one ever lobbied for the public interest.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    7. Re:Let's be logical about it by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1

      "I repeat, proper copyright law is a good thing. We used to have good copyright law. Unfortunately the copyright lobby has spent 200-odd years constanyly lobbing to expand copyright, and congress forgot the original intent of copyright, and no one ever lobbied for the public interest."

      I'd consider the 1790 Copyright Act fair, not good. The major failing in the law was that it did not make Copyright inalienable. We wouldn't be having the problems we are having now if a person's creation was considered a part of the person; which could not be sold or given away. The notion of copyright as something vaguely like property is just plain stupid.

      The two other differences from the 1790 law which I would advocate are outlawing works for hire, and limiting copyright related contracts to a maximum of three years.

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
    8. Re:Let's be logical about it by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Chuckle, when I said new vs old copyright law, I wasn't quite going back as far as 1790 :)

      I think the big issue today (aside from DMCA anti-circumvention, which isn't actually copyright law even if it is stuffed under the copyright title), is that the (proper) purpose copyright was created for was to ensure that the profits derived from a work went to the copyright holder. It did this through lawsuits to seize those profits and give them to the copyright holder.

      The important thing there is what isn't there. Copyright was never intended to apply to ordinary individuals who weren't making commercial use. "Fair Use" didn't even exist in copyright law untill 1976, because there was absolutely no need for the term. If you weren't collecting a profit on the work then there were no profits to seize in a lawsuit. Infringment simply did not exist without an attempt to unfairly profit.

      People go bezerk claiming at the notion that P2P could/should be perfectly legal, claiming that's the equivalent of repealing copyright entirely.

      I'm probably preaching to the choir here, but the music lables could have made a good profit selling MP3 downloads had they chosen to, even in the face of free and legal P2P.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    9. Re:Let's be logical about it by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1

      "I'm probably preaching to the choir here, but the music lables could have made a good profit selling MP3 downloads had they chosen to, even in the face of free and legal P2P."

      You are preaching to the choir here.

      They could have for awhile, but if they don't shut down P2P then the artists have a way to reach the fans without going through the labels. The RIAA has to shut down P2P in order to prevent their slaves from escaping.

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
  76. hmmmm by rwven · · Score: 1

    Well, what do you expect to get when you download something that straight out says it's illegal? You're obiosly going to get more illegal stuff. I thought there was probably an alterior motive as soon as i heard about ES5. I guess not downloading it would have been the best strategy in the first place....

  77. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by Malicious · · Score: 1
    The following students have all won Bicycles!
    Please report to the broom closet to collect your prize!

    Sounds just like that. All the movies you want, but once you've signed in, and proven you're simply stealing, they delete all your files, THEN sue you. It's a clever plan, too bad they got caught.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons Quote by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's an old and standard law-enforcement method of catching felons at large: offer 'em something free that's just barely too good to be true, and stand by with the handcuffs.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  78. your not a geek by smg_mrBlonde · · Score: 0

    "to many of you, computers and the Internet is Life Itself"

    Yes it is, you insensitive clod.

    I'm sorry, i have to go hang myself. A random feature just occurred to my windows ME, and i lost half a day's work on Autocad.

    1. Re:your not a geek by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      -I'm sorry, i have to go hang myself. A random feature just occurred to my windows ME, and i lost half a day's work on Autocad.

      Dude you need document management. Reply here if you want details.

      Oh yea, and maybe it is time to upgrade your workstation to Win2000Pro.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  79. My ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Developed at one of the numerous software development shops in Palestine. Uh-huh. Highly plausible.

    1. Re:My ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen it? No development shop required, no million monkeys. ES5? Visual Basic. One week. One monkey.

      It makes Kazaa Media Desktop look fucking polished.

      Hell, it makes Freenet look fucking usable.

      Film at 11. Can't say anyone's surprised.

  80. punish them... by Doobian+Coedifier · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...with their next bandwidth bill:

    $ wget -O /dev/null http://download.es5.com/es5us.exe

  81. Re:where... (read: reverse engineering) by jon3k · · Score: 1

    ...Never heard of the DMCA? ;)

  82. Ahem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming that it was MPAA or RIAA is a mistake. I would think that they would do it here in the USA or europe before going to the west bank/strip, so I highly doubt it.

    Obfuscation is a good reason.

    There are two angles here. Assuming that the RIAA/MPAA never did this, whoever did it gets to avoid being prosecuted by them (what with that part of the world not having to follow US laws...). If they did, they have plausible deniability, and would probably thus be immune from any lawsuits resulting from this, as the criminal activity occurred in a place beyond US jurisdiction.

    Then again, I'm not an (American) lawyer, and maybe I'm talking out of my tinfoil-hatted ass.

  83. Sacrificial goat... by erykjj · · Score: 1

    Don't use your main computer for the internet... use a sacrificial goat that you can rebuild from a HD image. Donwload your (il)legal files, burn them on a CD, and then put them on your main computer. Problem solved. Let them delete any files they want. (Problem might be with your personal info related to your internet provider getting stolen...)

    1. Re:Sacrificial goat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh no! My ISP info!

      iface_eth0="dhcp"

      My Life is Over!

    2. Re:Sacrificial goat... by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 1

      > (Problem might be with your personal info related to your internet provider getting stolen...)

      Simple solution, use a wireless card with a decent antenna and piggy back off of a neighbor. Let them get busted instead.

      --
      TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
  84. Re:This WHOIS just looks incredibly fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Pick your propaganda:

    Israeli or Palestinian.

  85. What if... by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

    Hmm, let's see, so now they have a nice delete function. Plus they have these wonderful supernodes which know the locations of all of the shared files on your computer (if not more, because you're already sending file info, why not just backpack on a few more?)

    So they have the supernodes which everybody connects to to search. So what would happen if all they had to do was to send a different malformed packet to any one supernode, which would distribute it to any other known supernodes, etc. Then the supernodes just begin to send all of these malformed delete packets to the clients and delete their files.

    Or they could just have some command to download a list of all of the files you've pirated to their servers, which I'm sure would make a nice little christmas gift for the RIAA.

    And because this is all done outside US jurisdiction, there's no real way to enforce any constitutional procections or laws.

  86. I was suspicious by techsoldaten · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was suspicious of this project from the beginning. The way they market their product, promising immediate access to copyrighted items, was just too rosy and would leave any company wide open for litigation. This passage in the announcement pretty much sums up my take on the whole affair:

    "The question then is 'why did they do it?' I'm sure they won't tell us, but here's a theory: They could be working for the RIAA, MPAA, or a similar organization. Once they have enough users on their ES5 network, they would start deleting all copyrighted files they own which their users are sharing. The users wouldn't know what hit them."

    Can anyone come up with a plausible scenario where a P2P company would release software that destroys a computer, if it is not connected somehow to these groups?

    1. Re:I was suspicious by Physics+Dude · · Score: 1

      No, no no. It's not being done by the RIAA/MPAA. It's being done by Senator Orin Hatch! His outspoken plans to automatically destroy infringing users' computers was well on it's way.

  87. yup by ed.han · · Score: 1

    precisely the point. it isn't about your desktop client.

    it's about the servers that enable trade at NYSE/AMEX/NASDAQ/whatever exchange; the boxes that process air traffic control; the processors running the power/traffic grids.

    no offense, but there's rarely been a better opportunity for a wrath of khan reference: "captain, his tactics suggest two-dimensional thinking".

    ed

    1. Re:yup by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Well, Earthstation 5 isn't exactly an application you would find running on stock exchange servers or air traffic control systems. It is an application you would find only running on individuals' desktop systems. And the original poster stated that the attack would "nuke millions of computers in an instant" meaning that he is referring to deleting all the files on those computers. A DDOS attack would only use those millions of computers to nuke a few servers, if they could. Therefore I was correct in ignoring the critical computer systems, because they could not be affected on a massive scale using this method.

      So there! ;-)

      --
      ...
    2. Re:yup by skarmor · · Score: 1

      Well, just to clarify, you said:

      "...a massive computer mixup is NOT a disaster on the scale of WTC or some other event causing major casualties."

      Others, myself included, noted that a "massive computer mixup" could in fact be disastrous (Air trafic control systems, stock market etc)

      You also said, "I just get annoyed when I hear a computer attack referred to as an effective terrorist strategy."

      We were simply pointing out that attacking computer networks could be an effective strategy, not necessarily in this case, but in general. In conclusion then, you are wrong and we are right. Let's move on...

    3. re: yup by ed.han · · Score: 1

      o, sure: i'm sure none of those guys ever would ever install unauthorized software on their desktops... :D

      and as the other reply inferred: i was responding more to your comparison to the WTC attacks, etc, than the rest to be honest.

      still: you're clearly clue-ful, so i regret using the wrath of khan line on you.

      ed

    4. Re:yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people really have no idea how servers are set up in the real world, do you? There is about as much chance of hacking a server on the NYSE with a little trojan, worm or manual hack as you do of jumping over the moon.

      Do you really think anyone is going to install any of this crap on real servers? What tech world do you people live in? Is there a decent sys-admin in the house?

  88. Standing Up for ES5! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon it was a GREAT program. I installed it the day after it was mentioned on Slashdot, and promptly found absolutely nothing of interest to download (or see at the local theatre).

    Granted I did use a sacrificial WinXP system, but hey, that's the way to sandbox untrusted stuff so you can try it (on the orange network segment).

    Of course, it also had to get moved outside the firewall, since it doesn't work unless it can verify an inbound connection from the ES5 master servers. But there's nothing questionable about that, is there?

    But it's no big deal since I'm sure the sacrifical PC was probably totally owned after about 10 minutes anyway (being naked on the net in a broadband user segment without being fully patched running WindowsXP).

    But hey, reimaging sacrifical PC's and toying with questionable apps is more fun than reading the subversive messages inside the Code Red bottle caps... (or watching some of the those "FIRST RUN FILMS!".)

  89. 'race' by metamatic · · Score: 1

    And what exactly is a "distinct race"? It sure as hell isn't a genetic difference.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  90. My mom always told me... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    "Backup early, backup often"...

    1. Re:My mom always told me... by coloclone · · Score: 1

      Dammit! I wish my mom would have told me that.

      /had to learn the hard way... the really hard way.

  91. Called it. by 72beetle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Told ya.

    -72

    --
    -Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music.
    1. Re:Called it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How did you call it? Looks to me like you just replied to someone who sort of called it.

    2. Re:Called it. by 72beetle · · Score: 1

      hey, I never said I called it without inspiration.

      -72

      --
      -Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music.
    3. Re:Called it. by Reziac · · Score: 1
      Me too!</AOL>

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  92. Re:where... (read: reverse engineering) by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    No, because I live in a civilised country, where you can't be sent to jail for describing ROT13.

  93. Re:Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil ale by dedalus2000 · · Score: 1

    It would be inconvenient trying to run our present society if Windows machines all went kablooey at once

    yeah not nearly as convenient as things are now when they go kablooey at random times.

    --
    My keyboads not woking popely.
  94. Re:where... (read: reverse engineering) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously this person is not afraid of breaking the law.

  95. Could the MPAA / RIAA be behind this? by DickBreath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Forgive me for even thinking the unthinkable. But please indulge me for a moment. Consider the hypothetical possibility that one of the *AA evil twins might create, build a website for, and promote some "anti-*AA" software. Imagine that it is a trojan horse. You let it into the city gates. It seems to be what you think it is. But at night, out comes the invading army through a secret door.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    1. Re:Could the MPAA / RIAA be behind this? by dbretton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I only wish it were, and I only wish the RIAA were to actually delete a file on my computer.
      That would place them in such an actionable position that I would probably have to beat back lawyers from my door with a broomstick.

      I am not a lawyer, but I would venture to guess that an act such as the RIAA using an application to delete files from my computer to violate several laws, at least in my state:
      unauthorized electronic trespass into a computer system
      criminal destruction of private electronic data
      et. al.

      I'm sure that there are a few federal laws violated as well.

      I would love to see it happen. I wouldn't mind retiring early, living off a fat MPAA/RIAA paycheck.

  96. No, It's DRM by tds67 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's obviously just Digital Rights Management code!

  97. Re:BAH! THIS IS JUST FUD by arth1 · · Score: 1
    Um.... $2.00 doesn't cover the hardware costs of producing a professional cd. If your requests are unresonable, don't be surprised when they're not met.
    [...]
    Do you honestly think all of that can be done for $2.00 per? Get real.

    You need to ask AOL that question. They seem to do it for less.

    Regards,
    --
    *Art
  98. A bit tired of this argument... by quacking+duck · · Score: 2, Insightful
    While I agree with the principle behind this argument, this is like saying you'll never get behind the wheel of a car unless you bought all the parts yourself and built it yourself based on freely available plans.

    After all, there's probably a GPS tracking system, data recorders that records the times when you're over the speed limit, and other potentially privacy-compromising system hidden in any car you buy.

    Do you trust the drinking water coming through your pipes? What, you filter it first? OK, have you bothered to take the filter apart yourself to verify its components work as advertised or do you accept that government regulations will keep them from selling a defective product?

    Consider Joe Average. Give him an open source program--he has to trust that you personally went through the code and verified it's clean, or that a bunch of unknowns on the net verified it. He sure as hell isn't going to go through all the code and compile it himself. And do you yourself trust that C compiler? There's that theory about how the original C compiler could have a backdoor put in, and every subsequent C compiler or program compiled could have a backdoor built into it during compile time.

    In truth you can't trust ANYTHING you don't make yourself. But it's not practical to make everything yourself because of time constraints or inexperience, so at some point everyone has to put their trust in some system they didn't make themselves. And yes, sometimes that trust is violated, like tires that blow apart for no reason or the water is tainted with e-coli. But in the real world most people can't afford to distrust absolutely everything and still live a real life. Neither can most people who have a computer.

    Like I said, I agree with the principle. But this is the real world, and many personal, idealized principles just don't play into it.

    1. Re:A bit tired of this argument... by pirhana · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let me clarify my point. Have you ever heard of any back doors in any open source software ? very less(if at all any). Now, have you heard of any back doors in commercial softwares ? Many. Just compare the P2P applications itself. Many of the closed source ones were alleged to have spywayre, backdoors etc(Kazaa and now this one for example). Was there a single case of such incident in open source alternatives ? I dont think so. So my point is that, the chance to find a back door in an open source software is close to zero. But thats not the case in closed source ones. Untill and unless proven otherwise by incidents, this argument will remain valid. I will not say that open source software is panacea or anything like that . But they are inherently more OPEN and transparant. In closed source software , you are trusting a SINGLE company which is not a good idea IMHO.

    2. Re:A bit tired of this argument... by Laplace · · Score: 1

      There are differences between software and the examples you give. If my car bursts into flames because of poor design, the auto maker becomes respobsible. If my water is poisoned, there will be an investigation.

      The writers and distributors of software aren't held liable for the damage that whey they created cause. Not closed source (you have read your EULAs, right?) or open source (GNU used to say "with anything free there is no guarantee"). At least with open source someone has the chance to audit the software and fix problems with it.

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
    3. Re:A bit tired of this argument... by wildchild07770 · · Score: 1

      I think people should be smart enough to look at this program and it's "company" and at FIRST glance realize something doesn't seem kosher. Even new unestablished P2P networks contain a degree of validity on their web pages, this place just LOOKS thrown together and reading their press statement makes it look like a sham. A degree of trust is implicit when you use a program or buy and use a product BUT this trust should be formed based on an understanding of the company and product you're choosing to get involved in.

  99. Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC it was the USians that settled in north-east Mexico (promising to be good subjects) and then called themselves Texas and conquered it/broke away. Since Texans got away with it, Israelis must figure they can do the same thing with Palestine, i.e. settle in the land and then use force to take control.

  100. Re: Palestinians are NOT a race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I do not advocate for either side of this conflict, but the Palestinians WERE NOT a race descended from biblical times. The modern Palestinian "race" was a hodge podge combination of immigrants from various African and Middle-Eastern countries during the 1800's and 1900's. The are virtually no Palestinians who can claim any more historical right to that land than the Israelis.

    Once again, I think they are both wrong, but you cannot make the claim that you have. The historical record is incontrovertible in this respect.

  101. a remote island? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    c'mon now - cuba isn't -that- remote... ;p

  102. And you're surprised? by Splat · · Score: 1

    Personally I uninstalled this program about 1 minute after installation when I realized it looked like an eager tenth-graders quest to make a Star Trek Skin for Kazaa.

    Terrible, TERRIBLE UI.

  103. Fuck you, Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See the fucking topic, then go screw someone out of some cash.

    A priest and a Rabbi were sitting in the park. A guy walks by them both. The Priest says to the Rabbi, "hey, that's one of my altar boys. Let's go fuck him!"
    The Rabbi says, "Fuck him out of what?"

    F-U-Jew!

    1. Re:Fuck you, Jew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a perfect example of someone who won't let the facts get in the way of their opinons.

  104. IP infringement = theft? Sweet!! by jarran · · Score: 1

    Piracy is the same as theft!? Why did no-one tell me before. I've spent ages trying to set up all this P2P crap when I could have been just nicking the CDs from HMV.

  105. Patch or Plunder by serutan · · Score: 1

    The author does make a convincing case that this feature is there. But if I had ES5, I would want to do one of two things: either try to come up with a patch that disables the delete feature, or use it to delete es5.exe from as many other computers as I could before removing it from my own.

  106. funny by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    on the download page, they show the texas state flag along with the other countries, and it links to a spanish version. hm.

  107. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  108. Re:Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil ale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Palestine."

    Try using a map from the last 50 years moron. There is no 'Palestine'.

  109. Who would mod this as informative? by mckyj57 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are the people here history-challenged, or what? A bigger bunch of baloney has never been posted.

    There may have been a territory called "Palestine" for years, but there were no "Palestinians". There are Arabs happening to live in that territory.

    WRT the "ethnic cleansing", I note that no evidence is provided. That would indeed be hard, since there cannot be any as none occurred.

    1. Re:Who would mod this as informative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah well there's no such thing as an "American" either, so we best not decline and have some superpower underwrite the Indians reclamation of our country in 2000 years.

    2. Re:Who would mod this as informative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, makes me wonder too. But still, some crackhead modded your post informative anyway.

      M.O.C.

  110. 1967 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC the sequence was: Egypt blockades red sea. Israel bombs Egypt. Egypt responds. Israel invades Egypt including Gaza and Sinai. (much later) Israel withdraws from Sinai but keeps Gaza (they need someone to do the low-paid jobs after all).

  111. Re:Now tell the bastards what you think! by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't get it, how can you fake the WHOIS registry? I thought there was some follow up needed?

    Man! All this time I've been putting my real name and address on like a sucker. Which is a pisser, b/c it really bothers me that people can look me up if they find something offensive on my website.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  112. OK, here's a reference. Happy now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    From the Glasgow Herald of 12 July 1920 The higher ranks of the Civil Service..would consist mainly of British officials until an increasing number of Palestinians were fully qualified

    But normally, during the mandate, the British tended to refer to them as 'Arabs'.

  113. ES5 is too shitty for this plan to succeed by heironymouscoward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I tried ES5 some time ago to see whether it worked or not.

    It was such junk that I uninstalled it without even managing to find a single thing, illegal, legal, whatever.

    If the application was designed to get a community and then hurt them, it is a real failure.

    What I suspect is that the people behind ES5 really are a bunch of half-mad Russian programmers paid by oil-quaffing Saudis, who actually believe that their application rocks. And they planned to get 15m users, then approach the highest bidder, advertisers or *AA, selling the captured market. The "encryption" stuff is just to make it impossible to reverse-engineer ES5 clients, and the backdoor is just there to up the ante for selling their shit to the *AA.

    A poor plan, horribly implemented.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:ES5 is too shitty for this plan to succeed by ViolentGreen · · Score: 0

      I didn't read the article but If I remember correctly, it was created by Palestineans in a refugee tent, thus being beyond the reach of the US copyright laws.

      As for the software, I went to the home page once. It was extremely unprofessional. I got no farther from there.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  114. Re:Now tell the bastards what you think! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The *maintainer* of Earthstation V's domain record is fom Israel. I do not know what this signifies.

    To see this, go here and click on the mnt-by ("maintained by") link.

    person: Moshe Maimone
    address: 63 Saudia Gaon
    Hertzlya, Israel
    phone: +39247585
    nic-hdl: MM9905-RIPE
    mnt-by: SPEEDNET-MNT
    changed: Speednet@email.com 20030508
    source: RIPE

    person: Motti Oran
    address: 25 Hasivin Street
    Petach Tikva, Israel 49170
    phone: +039247585
    fax-no: +039247736
    mnt-by: SPEEDNET-MNT
    notify: speednet@email.com
    e-mail: motti@speed-net.com
    nic-hdl: MO2551-RIPE
    changed: speednet@email.com 20030105
    source: RIPE
  115. A bit off the topic but very interesting by freakyfreak2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did anyone notice on the delete any file link that the next topic on that board was about the Half Life 2 source code and how it was actually leaked. http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/ 2003-October/011338.html Looks like microsoft's flaws are to blame

    1. Re:A bit off the topic but very interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A LITTLE offtopic? What the fuck is wrong with you mods?

  116. Business model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see... according to there site, no ads, no spyware, no popus. No support from the media industry (at least according to them).

    Where does the cash come from?

  117. Re: Palestinians are NOT a race by W32.Klez.A · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The historical record is incontrovertible

    There's no need for the jury to retire.

  118. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  119. Oh God not again... by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can someone please please PLEASE write a filter that excludes threads that mention the words "Israel" or "Palestine" more than once each?

    Here, guys, stop arguing. I'll make all of your arguments for you:

    Pro-Palestinian guy: Israel is guilty of $ATROCITY1, $ATROCITY2, and $ATROCITY3

    Pro-Israel guy: Surely you're not comparing things like $ATROCITY2 to $ATROCITY4, $ATROCITY5, and $ATROCITY6, which were committed by Palestinians

    Pro-Palestinian guy: Oh come on! $ATROCITY6 wasn't nearly as bad as $ATROCITY3! Besides, they only did it because of $ATROCITY3! If Israel had never committed $ATROCITY3 then the Palestinians wouldn't have had to have committed $ATROCITY6!

    Pro-Israel guy: but the Israels only committed $ATROCITY3 as a defensive measure because the Palestinians committed $ATROCITY7!

    This will continue for about 20 or so posts as both sides try to justify violence because of things that happened 30, 60, 100, or 5000 years ago; apparently in the middle east the moral high ground of a situation is inherited from your parents. I've really never understood that.

    Anyways, I've now said EVERY SINGLE THING every partisan in this argument has ever said and will ever say, so you can all just STFU.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:Oh God not again... by salesgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyways, I've now said EVERY SINGLE THING every partisan in this argument has ever said and will ever say, so you can all just STFU.

      Because of what the implecations of the actions 5000 years ago that let to the current state of injustice, future attrocities 9 and 11 will be committed in anticipation of attrocity 8. And the other side will preemptivly perform attrocity 13 to prevent numbers 9 and 10, but in doing so will actually guarantee that numbers 9 and 10 occur.

      Seriously: these people would do well to accept reality as it is, and start building their lives. Get rid of the leaders on both sides that are so hell bent on holding thier breath the longest. Exhale and get on with your lives. You only have so many years on earth, so why spend the rest of it fighting over things you have NO CONTROL OVER, DID NOT START AND REALISTICALLY CANNOT FINISH WITHOUT IT ENDING IN YET ANOTHER POMGROM? Neither side has the will or ability to kill off the other, and the world will not let that happen right now.

      --
      -- $G
    2. Re:Oh God not again... by Penguinoflight · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      just shut up man. Everyone is on one side of this, and everyone else is on the other side. It's mostly the not clear things in this that are important. Like the whole muslim race wants all the Jews, and Christians killed, or converted.

      It's not some secret plot, or a small cult of people who have this goal, but almost the entirety of followers of Islam. Even Saudi princes discuss with other Saudi princes (idiots in white turbans) about how to get rid of Israel. For the most part people of the Arab palestine do not want to live there, but no Muslim country will accept them.

      Why not? because they hate them too, but less than they hate "infidels".

      Ok, here you go, I didn't even mention any atrocitys, do any one sided comparison, and I've blown away your whole argument.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    3. Re:Oh God not again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is no such thing as a muslim race.

      stfu, you ignorant twat.

    4. Re:Oh God not again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you really ought to just declare an array of atrocities. It will make things much easier.

    5. Re:Oh God not again... by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      ok, jerk, what are muslims then? just try to twat your way out of that one!

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    6. Re:Oh God not again... by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      Wow, the grandparent comment really should include the following addendum:

      Right-wind Christian nut: Just shut up man. $RACIST_GENERALIZATION1. $UNINFORMED_EXTREMIST_STATEMENT1. $CLUELESS_POLITICAL_COMMENTARY1. $RACIST_GENERALIZATION2. $CLUELESS_POLITICAL_COMMENTARY2. $MORE_EXTREMIST_BABBLING1. $ABSOLUTELY_RETARDED_CONCLUSION1.

      Seriously, Christian extremists are just as insane as any other extremist group. It's people like the commenter above -- whether they're Muslim, Jewish, Christian or any other brand of extremist -- that are the cause of half the conflicts and brutality in the world. I mean, really, it's embarrassing to even be from the same species as these nuts.

  120. rm -Rf /dos by ghost-hacked · · Score: 1

    #/bin/sh mount /dev/hdb1 /dos #windows drive rm -Rf /dos #problem solved

    --
    --The Titanic was built by proffesionals. --The Ark was built by Amatures.
  121. Use only Open Source! by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative

    This just goes to show that you can not trust closed proprietary code. It is pretty weird that these ES5 guys would come out the way they did with big mouths. Either they work for the RIAA/MPAA or they *wanted* to be a target. I think it is the first one. If you are going to share files, make sure that you

    1. Use open source applications only.
    2. Share files that you have the legal right to share.
    3. If you do share some illegal file, see 1.

    There are 1,000's of songs out there that can be legally shared, and there are tens of thousands of files/applications out there that can be legally shared. Share those and dump the RIAA/MPAA all together. There is a good Open Source P2P app out there called giFT. It can connect to OpenFT, Gnutella and Kazza (FastTrack). giFT

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  122. Nice one ;) by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    Trousers down, bend over.......ready........thwack!

    Is this corporate terrorism perhaps?

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  123. Re:Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil ale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though not all Jews have Supreme Loyalty to Zion (see Jews for Justice in the Middle East and NotInMyName.org)it does seem likely since all of the major entertainment companies are run by Jews. It's a fact, look up the names of the execs.

  124. I don't like to get political but.... by reality-bytes · · Score: 1



    I'd like to get hold of both parties and knock their flamin' heads together. >:(

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  125. Bullshit. by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    If it sucks, I'd rather have NO gui, then one that makes me want to punch puppies.

    So is there a tui_earthstation5? COME ON!

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
    1. Re:Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, man, what I would give for a GUI that does make me want to punch puppies. That would be hella rad.

  126. Update from the releases Author by caferace · · Score: 1

    "FYI, they have now uploaded a new ES5 installer. I haven't installed it but you can be pretty sure that they have removed their malicious code and will soon claim I lied all along. See my original post for the MD5 sums of the tested programs (builds 1266 and build 2180)."

  127. the internet state in palestine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    hey there,

    im an israeli.
    and to tell you the truth, i was a bit afraid to post any comments last time since i didnt want to get into the heat of the argument.

    i just wanted to reveal some details regarding the state of the internet in palestine in an objective manner since i belive the cassual slashdotter might have percieved it wrongfully.

    palestine is currently in a semi anarchistic state. which means that most of its people do not have an internet connection at their disposal.

    a few years back israel started to provide palestinians with internet services.
    we thought that it would do good to open their minds to other world perspectives and international media. we still have no clue regarding the outcome :)

    afaik isps are very limited in palestine and most internet infrastructure is used for academic and government purposes. all internet traffic from palestine passed through israel, im uncertain whether this is true to this day, you can easilly check it.
    so yes its our fault such things happen and so im terribly sorry that it is being put into bad use.

    i would highly doubt that internet is available at jenin. jenin is a refugee camp in which people are forced to live in sub conditions which means,
    its probably one of the last places to have internet in palestine. therefore, i would presume the whois is fake.

    if a palestinian indeed wrote that software he would either be:
    a. a student in one of the universities.
    b. an arab israeli (the 20% of israeli population that live within us in peace which the media never mentions a thing about).

    also, ras kabir is a fake name. it means
    "big head" which means, the man in charge or someone who likes to take care of business.

    and just to ensure you we were not the ones to write it :)

    the israeli p2p app is a hacked version of kazaa lite ;)
    (which is a hacked version of kazaa located at
    http://www.kazaa.co.il)
    although only a low percentage of israeli p2p users actually use it. and it doesnt encourage piracy like es5.

    thats pretty much it, im sorry if i hurt anyone
    if you have any questions feel free to ask,
    just take into mind that im not into starting any flame wars in the proccess.

  128. Offtopic, like rest of thread. No karma bonus. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    There is a *lot* more to it than that.

    Pick up some histories of 1947 and 1948, read the memoirs of the founders of Israel, and research the laws that affect any refugee who tried to move back home.

    Draw your own conclusions, and be skeptical of anyone who assigns good and evil based on political boundaries. Arabs and Jews are both human, so you know that both sides have included noble, evil, self-interested, and just plain clueless people.

  129. Sure... by Illbay · · Score: 1
    Slash-dotters are going to run right out and install code from "rebellious types" who seek to "declare war" through nefarious means on "the establishment."

    Like there's no possible reason that such "rebels" would stick a thumb in ANY unwary eye that happens to be available, right?

    Slash-dotters are MUCH more savvy than that, right?

    I mean, RIGHT?

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  130. Saddam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yah, well most USians now believe that Saddam was behind 2001-09-11... after all the hijackers must have been Iraqis since that's who we're bombing!

  131. Re:Indulging in paranoid speculation - tinfoil ale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmmm.... tinfoil ale....

  132. Re:BAH! THIS IS JUST FUD by panxerox · · Score: 1

    Ha ! the ships sitting off Malaysia can do professional dvd9s for a buck ! I think the cost of professional cds is well under that.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  133. "EARTHSTATION FIVE" = "A SAFE REV HIT IT NOT" by deadlinegrunt · · Score: 1

    I think that means patches aren't going to help much on this one either...

    --
    BSD is designed. Linux is grown. C++ libs
  134. Re:BAH! THIS IS JUST FUD by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

    I think the cost of professional cds is well under that.

    That wasn't assumptions, that was a former touring and recording professional talking. I have been involved in cd production at both the indie and major label level.

    There might be a difference, however, in where the cd's are actually made. Malaysian labor isn't expensive at all, nor are products there. Here in the US, a blank cd costs money, so does the printing, so does the actual paper for the j-page, so does the jewel case, so does the label printing, etc... All of that, with shipping, adds up to about $4. If you find another artist getting a better deal, PLEASE let me know.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  135. They have their origin in Vanuatu, it seems. by jmajb · · Score: 1

    I googled for earthstationv and found some old WHOIS entries:

    NAMESCOUT CORP
    Domain earthstation5.com

    Date Registered: 2002-2-26
    Date Modified: 2002-6-13
    Expiry Date: 2005-2-26
    DNS1: ns1.earthstationv.com
    DNS2: ns2.earthstationv.com

    Registrant

    Earthstationv Ltd, A Vanuatu Corporation
    Jenin refugee camp #23
    Jenin
    PS
    NONE

    It seems they have moved sometime in the past...

    Jac

    1. Re:They have their origin in Vanuatu, it seems. by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily; Vanuatu is basically just a tax haven.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  136. Dont forget K7... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    damn tribbles...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  137. HIGHLY doubtful by Tuckdogg · · Score: 1

    That might be a nice possibility if all ES5 had was a P2P network, but they have one other thing on the table that makes the possibility of them being in league with either the RIAA or MPAA unlikely: they offer streaming copies of movies. If you have ES5 installed, you can go to an area that allows you to click on links to movies (many of which are in theaters right now) and watch them over the net for free. I have trouble believing that either cartel would allow millions to watch movies for free like that. Remember, free movies and music online like that costs all of them $60 billion-gazillion dollars a second!

    --
    Tuck
    Tuck's Journal.
  138. Re:Now tell the bastards what you think! by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is quite significant me thinks. It would not be unlike some Israeli fanatic to try to cause harm to ppl all the while blaming it on those "filthy" Palestinians. I think it actually fits quite well their mode of thinking. Besides, did anyone bother to check if the poverty ravished, infrastructure depleted Jenine even has an Internet Service Provider?

  139. Leave it installed - you deserve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I suggest that if you were stupid enough to install that software, then you are a detriment to the computing community and will probably leave it installed or install something even worse soon. So unless you're feeling especially kind to your fellow man, just leave it installed.

    On the other hand, if you *are* feeling socially responsible, then go ahead and smash your computer with a sledge hammer. Once that's done, go get a tatoo on your face that says "Do NOT sell a computer to me - I'm too stupid to use one."

  140. RIAA/MPAA "honeypot" by raresilk · · Score: 4, Informative
    When Slashdot initially ran the Earthstation V article, I posted a warning that this looked an awful lot like an RIAA/MPAA "honeypot" to me. Everybody ignored me, because they were too busy giving high-fives to Earthstation for bravely taking on the RIAA, etc. Now we learn that Earthstation has exactly the "feature" the Content Mafia would put in a honeypot - the ability to delete content off of your machine. I guess all of us (or at least some of us) are as gullible as the Content Mafia think we are.

    --
    No, no, no. This is not a sig.
    1. Re:RIAA/MPAA "honeypot" by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not me... I looked at their site back then, and decided it looked altogether too much like Bait.

      And I do recall that at the time, someone ran some checks on the program's behaviour, and pronounced it a trojan. Oooh, big surprise!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  141. Bummer!! by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ack, what could happen worse than a disaster like the WTC towers crashes terrorism?!? (intentionally bad grammar.) Computers control the world today, after all, if we had better computers, the terrorist never would have been able to sneak weapons on the airlines in the first place.

    While I'm aware than ES5 doesn't concern government or big business, it could have devistating effects IF it did. Think instead of a business instant messenger. That would be just peachy, so you're running the missle control program and just chillin' with your buds, and someone just deletes the trajectory file! If you were running a sane OS (defined as anything BUT Microjunk), the file would be in system memory, no problem. Of course you can understand the problems this would create on a microjunk platform!

    Missile386.exe has caused an illegal function and will be terminated, yeah, fun, real fun.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  142. Software freedom is a great redeemer. by jbn-o · · Score: 1
    I'm sure everyone has at least seen one article where they tell you to NEVER install software from a company you've either never heard of, or don't trust.

    Which is silly advice that completely misses an important point. The key is software freedom. It doesn't matter who made the software, what matters are the freedoms to inspect, run, modify, and share the software so these kinds of problems can be minimized and trust can be earned.

    Taken logically, if everyone behaved as those articles suggest, nobody would ever run software from organizations that start up tomorrow (and they might run proprietary software from older organizations even though proprietary software is inherently untrustworthy). We need the ability to leverage the freedoms of free software to make software trustworthy and useful. Shunning software because it comes from an unknown company isn't going to help us do that. Companies that used to be untrustworthy and try to become trustworthy by shipping Free Software should be supported.

  143. No... it's Senator Orrin Hatch! by Physics+Dude · · Score: 1

    His diabolical plans to automatically destroy the computers of alleged copyright infringers was well on it's way to fruition. And he would have gotten away with it too if it weren't for those meddling haxorz! ;)

  144. I'll go one further by serutan · · Score: 1

    I agree with you that equating "a massive computer mixup" with terrorism is stretching it, but I'm also getting tired of seeing the WTC be a benchmark of disaster. More than 3000 people got killed in the WTC, but in the 2 years since then drunk drivers have killed more than 10 times that many people. We've been tolerating that source of carnage for decades, so it's hard for me to see a single, Spielberg-scale event as the icon of death and national trauma (let alone a reason to jump up and spend 100 Billion dollars and burn down two countries).

  145. Re:Not-Palestinian, just a slander. -Marco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot trolls?

  146. ..but you NEED an enemy! by KingReuben · · Score: 1

    Classic PsyOps -- make the people believe there is an unseen enemy lurking around every corner, or hiding in every computer.. It really rankles me when I hear the term "cyber-terrorism" A worm trashing your system has nothing at all in common with a bomber killing your wife and child on a bus or a military bulldozer razing your house. (or a plane crashing into an office building murdering thousands or bombs falling from unseen bombers etc etc) That being said, this software in question SUCKED anyway! Talk about a piece of poorly programmed crapola. Is this the best that these "mad evil genius" ubervillains are capable of churning out?

    --


    --
    om Shanti
    1. Re:..but you NEED an enemy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being sensible!

      You have to understand that most of the people in this forum spend 10x more time on porn sites than with living women. For them, a computer outage means no sex as well as no job - so they get rather emotional.

    2. Re:..but you NEED an enemy! by plumby · · Score: 1

      When ever I hear the term cyber terrorism, I just assume that the Cybermen are about to invade, but then I am rather sad like that.

    3. Re:..but you NEED an enemy! by KingReuben · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, when I HAD a woman I was LUCKY if I was able to spend as little as 10x of my time on porn sites!!

      --


      --
      om Shanti
  147. Just one thing by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Is this Atro city in Isreal or Palestine?

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  148. Six months to spot an exploit? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    The software has been out for six months and nobody spotted an exploit? How come? Don't you people inspect the source code of every piece of software you ever install? That is the only way to avoid being bitten by malicious code. Either read the source code or show it to someone who understands it. {This includes your OS distributor. Anything you downloaded from their site should be fairly safe}.

    Oh, wait, it was a closed-source Windows application. Well, as far as I can see, if you play with something and you don't really know what it does, you get what you deserve.

    Wise up, people! Insist on seeing the full source code. If they won't show it to you, ask yourself what they're so keen to hide. And if you're so keen to share your files, just use Apache, for crying out loud.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  149. My dealings with ES5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a little email exchange with the ES5 crew a little while back. IMO, they are a group of inexperienced programmers who bit off MUCH more then they could chew. The backdoor sounds like one of those, "no one will ever figure this out..." things. I'd see how they respond to fixing the issue, if they do it.

  150. Oh no! by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

    My pr0n my pr0n my precious pr0n!

  151. Proof... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Zeropaid seems to have some proof... take a look and see... http://media.fastclick.net/w/get.media?t=n&sid=229 6&m=3&f=b&v=1.4&c=7193&r=http%3A//www.zeropaid.com /&d=f ...sorry about not bothering with html...

  152. Earthstation 5 Claimed to be Malware by h4rryc4ry · · Score: 1

    While this may or may not be true(I am not a programmer), I find it curious that the same company/website offers free streaming movies(incl Matrix, T3, etc). These streaming movies can easily be "recorded" onto your hardrive for viewing later. They used to have a site to view these movies but now you must use the software to gain access to them. So, if this is an RIAA/MPAA conspiracy, then why are they blatantly violating copyright laws?

  153. Islam, My Islam by Elroy+Jetson · · Score: 1
    Excerpt from "Islam, My Islam", an essay by Dave Sim:

    My Thesis is that, once you get down to the base level of people who seriously believe that babies are soldiers and that blowing yourself up next to women and children is a legitimate form of warfare, you are no longer dealing with human beings, you are dealing with homicidal nutcases. Armed homicidal nutcases. Armed homicidal nutcases who constitute a minority within a minority within a minority. That is to say, a "handful" of armed homicidal nutcases. The only sensible reaction to a "handful" of armed homicidal nutcases is the one the Israeli forces have been using: targeted killings. "Early retirement," coupled with surgical incursions into the homicidal nutcase breeding grounds, incarceration and interrogation to seperate the 1,450 terrorist participants from the 4,500 (relatively) harmless civilians. Contrary to conventional wisdom, I don't think homicidal nutcases are able to breed that fast. When you are dealing with 10% of 10% of 10% of 10%, it's basically a "grooming" operation: the way that apes comb through each other's fur to get the lice and ticks out. Do they get all of the lice and ticks out? No. Do the lice and ticks come back? Certainly. Then what's the point? The point is to keep the population of lice and ticks in your fur to a minimum.


    Let's see... Israel targets known terrorists/murderers and tries to take them out before they can kill again with a minimum of collateral damage. Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Aqsa, etc. consider infants and toddlers (as long as they're Jewish) to be "enemy combatants."

    I guess I can see that a sane, reasoning mind could find some Jewish guy building a house next to yours reason enough to strap a bomb to your chest and blow yourself up in a cafe. Eye for an eye, and all that.
  154. The front page lays it all out... by LunarFox · · Score: 1

    A large graphic at the bottom of the home page is quite clear:

    "The next revolution in P2P file sharing is here.
    Resistance is futile."

    Indeed.

    On a completely unrelated yet interesting note, the company's address is listed as 'Palestine'.

    --
    on.
  155. Ummm.... by caffeineHacker · · Score: 1

    YHBT. HAND!

  156. On topic by edxwelch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the origional Earthstation slashdot story came out, it ws claimed that this software had more movies and software than any other p2p system and was more secure.
    I posted what was one of the few on topic posts, and asked if anyone had actually used this program and if it was any good.
    Some kind slashdotter responded that it was very buggy and already installed many viruses on his PC and on that note I gave it a wide berth.
    Meanwhile everyone else in the discussion was totally engrossed in the Isreali - Palestinian flamewar and seemingly forgot what the origonal story was about.
    The moral of this all is:
    Well, stay on topic and you might learn something, but then again, fuck it, a good flamewar is always fun too!

  157. pathetic by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

    has slashdot sunken so low that it will parrot the words of any random nut without any kind of verification? Apparently, by all the crackpot science etc that slashdot posts every day.

  158. PRNewswire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just shows that those cunts will take anything. Bastards.

  159. Old News by Reziac · · Score: 1

    This is the 2nd time around for this story. First time, there was a link to a fairly in-depth analysis someone did of ESV's traffic habits (maybe someone here remembers where to find it). At that point it was already pretty clear that ESV is malware, *and* that it may be **AA baitware to boot.

    So this isn't news, just confirmation.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  160. ES5's Response by chrome · · Score: 1
    I haven't seen this (account needed) posted anywhere in this story:

    Random Nut, AKA Shaun Garriok, (http://www.zeropaid.com/news/articles/auto...o/04 282002c.php) the Author of Kazaalite, has been a vocal critic of Eathstation5 because of a continual online insult war between himself and some roudy Earthstation5 fans. This has motivated him to be extremely critical of Earthstation5.

    We at Earthstation5 desire and request criticism at any time in fact we demand it as we believe that is the only way to make software truly superior.

    We at Earthstation5 are not perfect, but we acknowledge that Shaun Garriok might be and thank him for helping us root out bugs.

    The problem with the Earthstation5 software that Shaun Garriok found truly exists, however the sordid motives he attributes to Earthstation5 are incorrect. The following functions were put into Earthtation5 to allow automatic, remote upgrade of the Earthstation5 software.

    These functions are:

    1) Reload Earthstation5
    2) Shutdown Earthstation5
    3) Delete a File

    All of these functions are necessary to perform when upgrading software.

    We have long been admirers of Shaun Garriok's ability to superbly investigate even a fully compiled program. We believe that he is capable of finding ANY sort of trojan, worm, or bug inside a compiled program. We are relieved that all he could find was these remote upgrade functions. He didn't find any bugs that send user data anywhere, no spyware, no adware, nothing in fact that gives away any personal information about the user using Earthstation5.

    It is also a fortunate fact that since Earthstation5 protects you from the RIAA lawsuits and hackers by hiding your ip address, the exploit program he wrote can only be used against your own computer which he states in his exploit. If you want to delete files from your own computer, we feel you have the right to do that.

    We are glad he found this bug and pointed it out. We completely removed the automatic software upgrade code because as it turns out automatic upgrade is no longer popular as it once was because it gives people an uneasy feeling and rightly so.

    Since Shaun Garriok seems to be concerned about everyone's security, and is not on a personal quest for revenge, we would be grateful if he would download the latest Earthstation5, version 1.1.31 (http://download.es5.com/es5setup.exe) and verify that we have truly removed the remote update function which his exploit program accessed. We think his dedication to the good of all concerned would motivate him to do this. Anyone else who is concerned can do the same, download the latest Earthstation5 and test the exploit code against it.

    Filehoover, Lead Programmer of ES5


    Not sure if I believe it, but its a plausible explanation, I guess.
  161. Did they not digitally sign the remote commands?! by no_mayl · · Score: 1

    Any software that can receive remote commands should have a built-in public-key, and only the writers of the software would have the matching private key.
    The software should check the digital signature of any incomming command, and only execute the authenticated ones.
    That way, no-body could exploit the remote-command feature.

    Check the phoenixnet backdoor at http://slashdot.org/yro/01/06/19/2039216.shtml
    it makes ES5's remote command scheme look sooo laaaame...
    PhoenixNet used to have remote controled sw that would only execute digitally signed commands.
    Over 200000 PC (UUID'd) would phone home every day requesting the latest set of digitally signed commands. Even if somebody DNS-forged the master server's name, they still could not send authenticated commands to those PCs.
    Other searches for "phoenixnet download" show that the scheme has been shutdown since some time.

    --
    jpa

  162. Re:Now tell the bastards what you think! by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 0

    Oh goodey some genius thinks this is a troll as in me trying to put messages up to get people annoyed so they flame me. Really. The fact that noone bothered checking the facts is not important apparently. I do hold some of the loudest bemoaners of Israeli "victimization" who at the same time cheer new settlements going up in rather low regard. Apparently that qualifies me as a troll. I venture to guess whoever moderated this is sympathetic to their view.