Slashdot Mirror


Israeli Super Drone Stolen

kristy_christie writes "Globes Online reports that Steadicopter's prototype pilotless helicopter was stolen a few days after the completion of its test program and final test flights. Interesting to note that Steadicopter claims that their helicopter is unique and there is no other of its kind in the world."

337 of 496 comments (clear)

  1. whoa! That's weird.... by TygerFish · · Score: 1

    A stolen UAV prototype!

    you kinda wonder who and why.

    It doesn't get weirder.

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."
    1. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by Davak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Steadicopter CEO Tuvia Scgl told "Globes" today that he had no doubt that industrial espionage was behind the theft. "We're convinced that the thief was working for our competitors, because he went directly to the helicopter's location, and broke only the guardrails to that room.

      No, not too wierd. One company stealing from another.

      Of course, it would be a great insurance fraud as well. Here in the US we just light fire to the build when the business isn't working. Maybe they had somebody steal the device because the project was dying.

      Remind me to sell my TEIC stocks.

    2. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by sandbagger · · Score: 3, Funny

      Be careful.

      This is how Airwolf started.

      --
      ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    3. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by qwave54 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Airwolf ... nah nahnahnah nah nah nah nah nah .... man that was an awsome tune lol

    4. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > A stolen UAV prototype!
      >you kinda wonder who and why.
      >It doesn't get weirder.

      "Oy vey, vat you theenk off our new toy, Mister Gant?"

      ("Rabbi, if he runs west he'll run out of fuel long before he reaches the rock of Gibraltar, and only a fool would turn east and risk the US air defences around Iraq! He is headed north, north I say!")

      One stolen thought-controlled Mach-5 stealth helicopter available to anyone who spots the reference.

    5. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Firefox, 1983, with Clint Eastwood.

    6. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "accidentally killing civilians as part of a military action"

      In that case, the IDF must be the most "accident" prone organisation in the history of the world.

      I notice that you didn't mention the fact that the UN has adjudged Israel's (why can't YOU spell Israel, by the way?) occupation illegal.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by Broken+Bottle · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a pilotless helicopter? Maybe it just ran away on it's own? :)

      Chris

    8. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Firefox, 1983, with Clint Eastwood.


      You would not believe the bad luck I've had today. Some punk with a BB gun shot a hole in the gas tank, so I had to set down. I must have landed it on the only frozen-over lake in the entire friggin' Middle East. (Well, at least I'm not surprised the ice was thin!) Your mind-controlled Mach-5 stealth helicopter drone will be delivered to you as soon as I escape from the basement of this bagel shop, dig out the drone from under the ice, and dry it off with some hair dryers. See you in Norway!


      (The sequel to the Firefox novel, Firefox Down, Craig Thomas :)

    9. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 1
      Actually it was called Palestine when ruled by the British and after the Jewish minority began terrorizing the British they left. The Jewish minority received arms from Europe and the US, asked other Jews to immigrate to Palestine and they went on to fight the Arabs in order to rule the country for themselves and rid Palestine of the Arabs. This is FACT Dayan, Rabin, and Sharon have all said these very things in speeches even today only a revisionist would say otherwise.

      It was called the British Mandate of Palestine, which was a poor choice of words; the land was administered under that title because Rome renamed Israel Palestine in honor of the extinct Philistines and in order to further disgrace the subjugated Jewish people. The Jews didn't receive arms or monetary support from Europe or the United States through the War of Independence, so you're a liar Mr. Historical Revisionist. And contrary to what you claim, the Israeli left you're fond of quoting did everything it could to maintain the Arab population. On the eve of the War of Independence, David Ben Gurion begged the Arabs to stay and live in a egalitarian, democratic state; thankfully many of them fled on their own volition, at the urging of their leaders who claimed conquering Arab armies were coming to push the Jews to the sea. In the Six Day War, leftist leaders successfully convinced Arabs not to flee. But please don't just take my word for it, those of you who are skeptical of both sides-go read up on the history for yourself.

      Not true. There has been a jewish minority as early as 1880 but calling a small group of jewish farmers living in isolation a majority is garbage.

      Dingis, if you think you actually have a grasp on the history of the conflict, it's time for you to hit the books again. Take a look at what British officials or men like Mark Twain were saying about the region in the 19th century.

      Hello I'd like to turn the US back into an Iraquois state as it is our ancient homeland and we have been persecuted for years. Then I form an army and start attacking to make it happen. What would you do?

      Well, sir, your analogy works far better for the Zionist cause than against it. The plain and simple truth which you'll never admit to understanding is that the purportedly mighty Arabs were vanquished time and time again. They couldn't push the outnumbered, outgunned Israeli army to the sea in 1948. They couldn't destroy Israel in 1973, after they had the audacity to sucker punch the state on the most holy day of the Jewish calendar. They are perennial losers, and they figured that out long ago. Instead of fighting Israel valiantly in a military conflict, they now have their spawn strap explosives to themselves in order to blow up civilians. They'll never be able to stomach the fact that we won't cede our lives and eternal property anymore.

      The native americans have a much better claim to America than the Arabs who refer to themselves by the P word ever had to Eretz Yisrael. You believe that the Indians were dispossessed along with the Arabs, but you only advocated the barbarous acts of the latter. Why would that be, exactly? I suppose you know that if you were to be consistent, you'd seem really foolish to advocate that the native americans go the route the Arabs have with Israel. Do you think that the United States, or any nation other than Israel for that matter, would possibly stomach insurrection and terrorism in the way Israel has? Israel is the only nation on the face of the earth that is forced by the world community to countenance a perpetual war within its own borders.

      The rest of your post is pure crap that even a deadfast zionist such as Sharon would'nt even agree with. As for walking out on camp David it was Rabin's assination by right wing Israeli fanatics that caused that to fail. Israelis didn't want to give up any of the land they stole.

      Your fallacious attack against the original poster aside, again you've betrayed your ignorance. The Camp David Accords to

      --
      Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
    10. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      In the 60s the arabs again tried to wipe out Israel. As a result of the 6 day war, Israel got a bunch of land with a palistinian majority, that it didn't want.

      Tell me again, what the sailors on the USS Liberty did to incur a 75 minute Israeli attack during the 6 day war?

      Oh and one other thing, anyone who suggests that delibrately targeting and killing civilians and accidentally killing civilians as part of a military action are morally equivilant needs their head examined.

      Sharon and Arafat have both intentionally killed civillians. They both have no claim to moral high ground.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    11. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      Don't forget, the same UN that let's Syria head the Security Council. Syria occupies Lebanon, but nobody complains about that illegal occupation.

      Not to mention, the same UN that had "peacekeepers" at the Israel/Lebanon border who sat by as three Israelis were abducted by hezbollah.

      The same UN that denied, despite claims, it had a videotape of the incident.

      The same UN that finally admitted it did have a videotape of the kidnapping, and released it to Israel with the kidnappers faces blacked out.

    12. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by GMontag · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I notice that you didn't mention the fact that the UN has adjudged Israel's (why can't YOU spell Israel, by the way?) occupation illegal.

      Ahem, would you like to expand on this fiction?

      Yes, numerous times the UN General Assembly has condemned Israel's continued LEGAL stewardship over land in dispute (as defined by the Laws of War and Peace), but I do not recall a single adjudication, by the Security Council or anybody else besides the Soviet Block an dthe Arab League that supports your yarn.

      Now, when one nation invades another and the invader gets their ass kicked the winner gets to administer the land until there is a settlement. Those are the international rules, like them or not.

      BTW, before you bring up the "P" word, neither Jordan nor Egypt nor Lebannon nor Syria ever made an effort to make an autonomous "Palestine".

    13. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      If you accuse the UN of being biased by the Soviets or Arabs, then why was the latest vote condemning that apartheid wall passed by something like 133-4? What do Eastern Europe, South America, and African countries have that calls into question their judgement? They all voted to condemn the wall and consider it a breach of international law.

      I really don't care about Egypt or Jordan or Lebanon or Syria. All corrupt governments, but I would expect Israel to outperform them on that Road map. I really am disappointed, it looked like a realistic plan and Arafat signed onto it at least.

    14. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Hey, how can you discriminate against the millions of Arabs like that? Do you know how many supported the road map? Do you know how many don't support Suicide bombings? Do you know how many turn in suspected terrorists, how many help the IDF to arrest their neighbors?

      What do you mean by Arabs? Not all muslims, don't forget the millions of Christian arabs you're subjugating. Do you know the poverty level in Palestine? Do you know how that wall and roadblocks and checkpoints and Jewish-only highways are hurting innocent people?

      Listen, racist Arab-basher, you can support ethnic cleansing all you want, but I promise that people aren't going to let you get away with it.

      --There, how does that sound in the same vein as your tone?

    15. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by GMontag · · Score: 1

      BTW, there are NOTHING LIKE 137 Security Council, the body that matters. Votess in the General Assembly are about as meaningful as City Council votes to be a "Nuclear Free Zone".

      I really don't care about Egypt or Jordan or Lebanon or Syria. All corrupt governments, but I would expect Israel to outperform them on that Road map. I really am disappointed, it looked like a realistic plan and Arafat signed onto it at least.

      No kidding. I guess you are not aware that you are talking about what WAS their land and was captured by Israel? Didn't think so.

      I seriously hope that you are not under the impression that this land was ever a "Palestinian state", but it would not surprise me.

    16. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by the+morgawr · · Score: 1
      Should have read:

      not with FALSE accusations of Jenin and Sabra and Shatila

      > and techniques that technically aren't torture but are uncomfortable

      Placing suspects in uncomfortable possitions is a form a torture. It is expressly illegal in Israel (although it is VERY legal in the US and I don't see you complaining).

      > And when did Arafat torture his own people?

      He has publicly threated to kill (technically "put bullets into the chest" of) anyone who tries to make peace with the Israeli's. His policies discriminate against women. Homosexuality is not tolerated at all. Furthermore, if you publicly speak out against him, you will be thrown in jail. Torture is legal and practiced by his security forces.

      > Sharon didn't follow the Road map, even though Mahmoud Abbas held up his end

      Abbas tried to hold up his end but was stopped by Arafat. Sharon did follow the road map, President Bush has said as much.

      > I don't think Israel is doing a better job than the US

      The US has killed more innocent Iraqi's in this war then Israel has killed innocent Palistinians in the entire Intefada. Israel's military is governed by civil law and must answer to the Supreme Court (which has regularly ruled against the military and let known terrorists go due to what most people would call technicalities); terrorists have the same legal rights as any Israeli civilian. In the US, the military has a separte court system, and separate rights for "enemy combatants". Given that Israel is right next door to the Palistinians and must worry about it's civilians, while the US is a world away from Iraq and must only protect it's soldiers, I think Irael is doing a better job, but make of the facts what you will.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
    17. Re:whoa! That's weird.... by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      The land was as much a Palestinian state just as much as North America was an Indian state. Ignore the government or lack thereof and realize that there were Palestinian people living there. It doesn't matter who ruled them, but that they had homes on that land. I hope they get at least part of it back before they die, because you can't give something back to later generations, like the Zionist idea espouses.

  2. lemme guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It runs on linux and, therefore, it logically follows that it was stolen by terrorist.

    1. Re:lemme guess by Deusy · · Score: 4, Funny

      It runs on linux and, therefore, it logically follows that it was stolen by terrorist[s].

      If you'd actually looked at the helicopter then you'd well know that it could not run linux nor was it stolen by terrorists.

      Linux would not run on something so hideous.

      It has been stolen by environmental extremists to protect the world from having to look at it. Who knows how it might have decimated wildlife died of fright after thinking clams were out for revenge after having become giant and gotten the ability to fly.

      Either that or group behind Batteries Not Included was out to protect future royalties and the potential for a remake.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    2. Re:lemme guess by hazem · · Score: 1

      It has been stolen by environmental extremists to protect the world from having to look at it.

      So NOW we know what they do with all the foreskins!

    3. Re:lemme guess by mlush · · Score: 1
      Seriously? Probably not. You only need a pilotless drone when you can't get volunteers for suicide missions. Terrorists have no shortage of volunteers for those types of missions.

      Not all terrorists are drooling fanatics in funny clothes. Most have a sense of self preservation.

    4. Re:lemme guess by EvilAlien · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe SCO took it. I have every reason to believe that they are also secretly developing weapons of mass intellectual property destruction.

      George, are you reading this?

      Hello?

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    5. Re:lemme guess by TummyX · · Score: 1


      Regardless of how you say it, the "drooling fanatics" are brave.


      Well many are absolutely positive that they will go to heaven and get lots of rewards if they die blowing up "the enemy". Those ones certainly aren't brave.

    6. Re:lemme guess by mlush · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Interestingly enough, the drooling fanatics are the most successful.

      Are they? They have got a lot of headlines, but do suicide bombings actually achieve anything other than convince the target that the terrorists cannot be negotiated with, only eliminated?

      Suicide attacks are an admission on the part of the terrorists that they have no other way to further their cause and an inditement on the target for putting the terrorists in that position in the first place

    7. Re:lemme guess by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "Regardless of how you say it, the "drooling fanatics" are brave"

      Are you an idiot? They strap bombs to themselves, walk into resturants, sit by families with kids, then blow themselves up.

      That isn't brave, that is murder.

    8. Re:lemme guess by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      What do you call the illegal Israeli occupation of Palestine? One outrage begets another.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:lemme guess by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      FROM: http://www.meforum.org/article/263

      You should read it, it might help you better understand. ::Text Begins::

      "The mass departure from Palestine of 590,000 Arabs began only in April 1948; yet , Heykal Pasha had publicly and very formally announced a program to expel Jews from Arab countries fully five months earlier."

      "At times, Iraqi politicians candidly acknowledged that they wanted to expel their Jewish population for reasons of their own, having nothing to do with retaliation for the Palestinian exodus. Perhaps the most interesting incident took place at the tail end of the Israeli war of independence, in late January or early February 1949, when Iraq's Prime Minister Nuri Sa'id described a plan to expel Jews from Iraq to Alec Kirkbride, then the British ambassador at Amman, and Samir El-Rifa'i, head of the Jordanian government. Kirkbride recounts that Nuri

      Came out with the astounding proposition that a convoy of Iraqi Jews should be brought over in army lorries escorted by armoured cars, taken to the Jordanian-Israeli frontier, and forced to cross the line. Quite apart from the certainty that the Israelis would not consent to receive deportees in that manner, the passage of Jews through Jordan would almost certainly have touched off serious trouble amongst the very disgruntled Arab refugees who were crowded into the country. Either the Iraqi guards would have had to shoot other Arabs to protect the lives of their charges. . ."

      You should read it, it might help you better understand.

    10. Re:lemme guess by cpghost · · Score: 1

      It was a time machine! It's still there, in another time frame. Or will be there, or was there, ... oh now, I'm all confused about time travels!

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    11. Re:lemme guess by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Nice response. What happened to "One outrage begets another."?

      You need to tell your beliefs to the next person murdered by the bombers. You know the innocent women and kids that haven't done anything wrong. Those people. The innocent.

    12. Re:lemme guess by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      That's the HiMac.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    13. Re:lemme guess by Stargoat · · Score: 1
      Suicide attackers got the US out of Iran. Suicide attackers got the US out of Lebanon. Suicide attackers got the US out of Somalia. Suicide attackers kept the US out of Iraq the first time around, and they're well on their way kicking the US out again. That's a successful record.

      The problem is not US ideology, or that the US is morally correct. The US is. The problem is that the US is unwilling to stand up and fight for freedom. And when it does, it just backs down after a couple of months.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    14. Re:lemme guess by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      As any pilot can tell you, Helicopters don't fly. They're just so ugly that the earth pushes them away.

      --

    15. Re:lemme guess by Hast · · Score: 1

      The children are innocent, that is true. AFAIK women are draften in Isreal as well as men. So they are not as much civilians as "off duty military". And most significantly, Isreal is a democracy and therefore they all share the responsability for what their government do.

      I don't condone the act of terrorist actions. But there is more to the issue than horrible terrorists blowing up innocent women and children.

    16. Re:lemme guess by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Then the same logic can be used to justify Israel's actions, can't it?

    17. Re:lemme guess by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      If they're settling occupied land, have served in the IDF and vote for fucking Sharon they're hardly INNOCENT, are they?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    18. Re:lemme guess by mlush · · Score: 1
      Suicide attackers got the US out of Iran. Suicide attackers got the US out of Lebanon. Suicide attackers got the US out of Somalia. Suicide attackers kept the US out of Iraq the first time around, and they're well on their way kicking the US out again. That's a successful record.

      Could you provide a few references to these suicide attacks? The only thing that kept the US out of Iraq the first time was a desire to make the war last a nice round number of hours.

    19. Re:lemme guess by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Kids and teens below the age of majority/concent are not exempt from the bomb attacks.

      IF they were attacking military targets it MIGHT be different. But a pizza shop is not a military target.

    20. Re:lemme guess by retinaburn · · Score: 1
      Linux would not run on something so hideous.

      Oh ya how pretty is your UAV ?

    21. Re:lemme guess by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      It depends what that pizza shop is standing on top of, and who built it.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    22. Re:lemme guess by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Linux would not run on something so hideous."

      Yeah, that'd never happen.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    23. Re:lemme guess by Stargoat · · Score: 1
      mlush,

      It shouldn't be necessary, but I'll educate you.

      Here are the numbers: Lebanon, 241 dead marines, Somalia, 18 soldiers, Iran, 54 US embassy workers kidnapped for 400 days.

      Fear of Iranian intervention and Arab disapproval kept George Bush from entering Iraq the first time. If you doubt this, then I'm not going to bother finding links. Wait two hours, and look at my journal.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    24. Re:lemme guess by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I'd like to agree with you, because you make sense.

      Then I look at how much US culture and society has changed in the past 2 years.

      Small example, but to me, the terrorists had already won when the most recognizable landmark and tourist attraction in the United States (she's green and in the water for anyone not on the ball yet) is closed indefinitely.

      The very symbol of freedom, and no one's free to visit it.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    25. Re:lemme guess by linzeal · · Score: 1
      You cannot cause heavy civilian casualities as a means of changing things to something better, neither the Israelis or the Palestinians are doing well in this accord. What the world needs to do is quell both of them, I don't think they are capable of solving this constant struggle for supremacy on their own. If the EU, Russia, and the US told them that this is how it must be with economic sanctions and talk of UN troop deployment than both sides would cave eventually even if the world was forced to bully them a bit. I do not understand why we reserve peacekeeping missions for 3rd world countries.

      Luckily for one the israeli soldiers are beginning to show compassion at the highest echelons after years of being mired in discontent in the lower ones. From my understanding of military history the cause of expanding Isreal's borders with the cost of human life has become untenable.

      A jewish friend put it to me succinctly, "It will not stop until Isrealis and Palestinians look at each other and see the same grief and than rejoice in that absolution."

    26. Re:lemme guess by mlush · · Score: 1
      Here are the numbers: Lebanon, 241 dead marines, Somalia, 18 soldiers, Iran, 54 US embassy workers kidnapped for 400 days.

      So all these people died from suicide bomb attacks??? Including the ones kidnapped for 400 days??? I didn't see the Judean People's Front's, crack suicide squad in Black Hawk Down, but thats just a film

      Fear of Iranian intervention and Arab disapproval kept George Bush from entering Iraq the first time. If you doubt this, then I'm not going to bother finding links. Wait two hours, and look at my journal.

      Iranian intervention and Arab disapproval and not suicide bombers, In case you have not been reading this thread the original post was about suicide missions, my responces were about suicide bombing, Your responces were about suicide bombing

      You have demonstrated that the US is casualty shy, but you still have to demonstrate the "the drooling fanatics are the most successful."

    27. Re:lemme guess by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      What do you call the suicide bombers of Sep. 11, suicide bombers of Iraq, suicide bombers of Afghanistan, the suicide bombers if Chechnya/Russia, the suicide bombers of Pakistan, etc etc.

      Stating suicide bombing is the last resort from an oppressed people (aka Palestine) is entirely ignorant, because it ignores all the other locations in which they occur and are just as accepted.

    28. Re:lemme guess by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      so it's acceptable to murder a kid that just might flee the draft, and whose parents voted for the parties against the occupation?

      sorry, lumping all israelis into the label "racist occupiers" is just as bad as claiming all jews own germany.

    29. Re:lemme guess by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1

      So then Jews evicted from Jordan (where it's illegal for a Jew to become a citizen), and Jews evicted from other Arab nations should bomb the families that live in their old houses, instead of getting on with their lives in a new place?

    30. Re:lemme guess by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      brave (adj):
      1. Possessing or displaying courage. Able to face and deal with danger or fear without flinching.
      2. Invulnerable to fear or intimidation.
      3. Brightly colored and showy.

      Clearly strapping a bomb to yourself requires some ability to face and deal with danger, and it's kinda tough to feel intimidated when you explode if someone hits you, as evidenced by many a Tom & Jerry cartoon, and I think we can all agree mushroom clouds of fire and flaming baby heads are inherently rather showy.

      Oh, wait, you work for ABC, don't you? Damn yous! Jimmy Kimmel to replace Bill Maher? What the hell were you people thinking? And even that might've been good if you'd just let him liquor up and run around like an idiot instead of making crappy jokes. But no, you had to give up the angry clever sexist bastard for the unfunny fatass sexist bastard. Fortunately for you I steal HBO. Otherwise I might've had to pry my ass out of the sofa and start something.

    31. Re:lemme guess by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Don't give me that crap. How many Jews were evicted from Morocco? And how many remain there? Israel gives away the land it steals from Arabs to incoming Jews - is it any surprise that so many Jews drain out of surrounding countries into Israel?

      Shit, if the USA offered free land to British citizens, Britain would empty out pretty fucking quickly too.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    32. Re:lemme guess by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      I wish more people would share that point of view, because this quote I read in an israeli paper really disturbed me:

      "It's preferable for Palestinian mothers to cry than Israeli mothers."

      --Israeli Military Intelligence commander Major General Aharon Ze'evi, Haaretz, 10/22/03

    33. Re:lemme guess by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      It's not the shop I'm worried about, but the people inside. Ok, the land is stolen. But that doesn't mean kill people living inside. That a good enough moral answer?

      Let me play devil's advocate for a moment. The people staying there, assuming they are adults, are living there of their own free will, supporting the Israeli occupation, paying taxes, and staying on the stolen land. They know that they've been asked and demanded to leave by Palestinians. What other way is there for a Palestinian to get his land back? Write a letter to Yassir Arafat and the UN saying that they've been wronged?

      What solution have the Israelis provided? I don't support terrorism, but I'm confused as for an answer, or at least Israel's officially-declared solution of redress (and I'm not buying the Zionist arguements, give me anything else).

    34. Re:lemme guess by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      Jordan offers citizenship to any Palestinian refugee that wants to move there.

      Besides that, you're confusing voluntary immigration to Israel with FORCED eviction from a country.

      I'm sorry you don't want to consider that Jews were evicted from those "innocent" Arab countries. I guess it distorts the perfect black/white good/bad simplistic view of the conflict you have.

    35. Re:lemme guess by rifter · · Score: 1

      "Not all terrorists are drooling fanatics in funny clothes. Most have a sense of self preservation."

      Interestingly enough, the drooling fanatics are the most successful. Regardless of how you say it, the "drooling fanatics" are brave. They do believe in something, and it is very difficult to stop someone who is willing to die for his cause.

      Especially when his foes are stupid Americans (or Israelis) who are unwilling to think about what they themselves have, what they themselves do not have, and what they themselves are fighting for.

      That's alright, then. As Patton said, nobody ever won a war by dying for his country. The idea is to get the other poor dumb bastard to die for his country. So, blow yourselves up, terrorists! I hope you all do and save us the trouble!

    36. Re:lemme guess by Stargoat · · Score: 1
      Heh. I knew someone was going to bring that up. (I love that line.)

      The problem isn't that the bastards are dying for their country. The problem is that the US isn't willing to let the bastards die for their country and stay in the fight in the mean time.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  3. Wait a minute... by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't this the plot of a James Bond flick??? I'm just waiting for the perpetrators to be caught, and be named something like "Pussy Galore"...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re: Wait a minute... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > Isn't this the plot of a James Bond flick??? I'm just waiting for the perpetrators to be caught, and be named something like "Pussy Galore"...

      Alas, James was disappointed to learn that this one was stolen by Dick A. Plenty.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Wait a minute... by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa · · Score: 1

      Isn't this the plot of a James Bond flick?

      Only if it has 100% rad-hard circuitry in order to survive an EMP, like the helicopter from Goldeneye.

      --
      Well, hey, I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
    3. Re:Wait a minute... by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1

      But would it star the rest of My Life With The Thrill Kill Kult? Or was that Lords of Acid... Like it matters, they've been on perpetual tour together for the last decade or so anyway...

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
  4. Quick! by mr_resident · · Score: 5, Funny

    Check eBay!

    1. Re:Quick! by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Alas, no automated helicopters. You CAN get a badass 1966 military helicopter, though.

  5. not Stolen by boesOne · · Score: 4, Funny

    It escaped !

    1. Re:not Stolen by MouseR · · Score: 1

      T3 Happening for real!

      Run for cover!

    2. Re:not Stolen by tkittel · · Score: 2, Funny

      well in that case...

      I for one would like to congratulate our new super drone overlord!!!

      (it had to be said).

  6. It has started ! by Mr+Europe · · Score: 1, Funny

    The machines are getting concious ! The robot-helicopter is soon giving coocrdinates for the moon based microwave beam !

  7. Holidays ? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    If it's that automated, perhaps it's gone for a fly somewhere

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Holidays ? by vrlink · · Score: 1

      to meet its creator?

  8. Copy of article... by pdjohe · · Score: 5, Informative
    The site seemed slow when I viewed it so here is a copy of the article to save some bandwidth...

    Sources inform "Globes" that Steadicopter's pilotless helicopter prototype was stolen on Saturday-Sunday night. Unknown parties broke into Steadicopter's Kfar Maccabi plant, and stole the helicopter, but not its computer software or the money in the office.

    Steadicopter is collaborating with Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI) on the project. Steadicopter claims its pilotless helicopter is the first of its kind in the world.

    Steadicopter business development director Amir Rochman told "Globes" that the helicopter was stolen a few days after the completion of its test program and final test flights, during which it flew automatically and reached its targets using the global positioning system (GPS).

    Rochman said, "We invested NIS 5 million in the project in the past three years, and today the police came to the factory to investigate and lift fingerprints."

    Steadicopter CEO Tuvia Scgl told "Globes" today that he had no doubt that industrial espionage was behind the theft. "We're convinced that the thief was working for our competitors, because he went directly to the helicopter's location, and broke only the guardrails to that room.

    "The helicopter is unique. No other company in the world has succeeded in operating such a flying machine, capable of independent flying without remote control. Many companies have tried, but none of their tests worked."

    Steadicopter was launched in the TEIC Technion - Israel Institute of Technology incubator in Haifa. The companies owners are TEIC, Rosh Ha'Ayin-based ITES - Imaging Technology Enterprise Systems, Renault importer Yoel Carasso, and businessman Yossi Kabiri.

    Published by Globes [online] - www.globes.co.il - on November 10, 2003

    1. Re:Copy of article... by Glock27 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      what's the point.. in doing an automated chopper.. that relies on foreign nations good will to operate?

      though, if the whole nation relies on that maybe it makes sense.

      Israel relies on US military hardware and goodwill in a wide range of areas. No surprise there.

      Many NATO allies also use GPS-dependent equipment.

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    2. Re:Copy of article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Many NATO allies also use GPS-dependent equipment.
      Which is why we're developing our own GPS replacement just as quickly as we can...
    3. Re:Copy of article... by redhog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, it isn't that unique. At Linkoping University, Sweden, the WITAS project is working on a similar thingy, see http://www.ida.liu.se/ext/witas/ And it seems quitte some other uni's around the world are involved in imilar projects, too...

      --
      --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    4. Re:Copy of article... by geirhe · · Score: 1
      "The helicopter is unique. No other company in the world has succeeded in operating such a flying machine, capable of independent flying without remote control. Many companies have tried, but none of their tests worked."
      This is wrong. A friend of mine made a model airplane that flew about 1hr, then turned around and came back to within radio range in the early 1980s. No GPS, just inertial (gyro) control.
    5. Re:Copy of article... by GooberToo · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The helicopter is unique. No other company in the world has succeeded in operating such a flying machine, capable of independent flying without remote control. Many companies have tried, but none of their tests worked."

      That may be true, for a company, however, I've seen a fully autonomous remote control helicopter before. Which is to say, it was a remote control helicopter that flew via onboard computer and did not actually use a remote. In fact, it even has AI that it used to determine it's best route and best orientation to get from A to B. IIRC, this was the work of an MIT student. He had a video of his AI controlled helicopter flying around. It did it's own odd manuvering to get there and back. It even had an onboard camera.

      I can't see that the stolen copter is much different...just on a larger scale.

    6. Re:Copy of article... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Israel relies on US military hardware and goodwill in a wide range of areas.

      Actually, the Isrealis have their own electronic systems that they add to US equipment that is often superior to US gear. My guess is that this is partially due to the fact that they dont have to sweat entire planes, just how to make them work better.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    7. Re:Copy of article... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Israel relies on US military hardware and goodwill in a wide range of areas. No surprise there.

      And at present a third of the Israeli air force is grounded because of an arms embargo by my country, the UK. The sole source for power packs for the ejector seats used in their older jets has been prohibited from exporting replacements.

      From a strategic point of view there is no reason to avoid dependence on US arms exports since the Israeli ecconomy is entirely dependent on the US.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    8. Re:Copy of article... by sigxcpu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... since the Israeli ecconomy is entirely dependent on the US. </I>

      The U.S. aid to Israel is only several percent of Israel's gross national product.

      Saying that Isreal is depnedant on the US is like saing that, since most of the grain in the world is growen in the US, the only people who are not dependant on the US are those who live in Africe. (they can't pay for US grain...)

      --
      As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
    9. Re:Copy of article... by Glock27 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      it would be just silly to rely on GPS as something that'll always be available at no political cost ("you'll drop the tariffs now or we'll switch you off GPS").

      That's not how GPS works. There are two GPS signals, the civilian one and the encrypted military one. The military version is more accurate than the civilion version, and in wartime civilian GPS is degraded to 100 m. accuracy instead of better than 10 m. I presume worldwide military GPS is unaffected, although that is a function of the encryption method used and whatever controls they built into "foreign-owned" military GPS sets. That is all classified and I have no direct knowledge of it. I presume our allies wouldn't tolerate unilateral shutoff in the equipment they bought.

      GPS was tremendously expensive to implement, and is quite vulnerable to attack. Good luck to anyone seeking to duplicate it.

      The U.S. also has plenty of the most sophisticated GPS jamming equipment, and I'm sure will have no problem jamming other systems as well, as needed.

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    10. Re:Copy of article... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      The U.S. aid to Israel is only several percent of Israel's gross national product.

      Israel currently receives over half of all US aid. If Israel can do without that aid I am sure that the US taxpayer would be only too happy to stop paying for it.

      The fact is that the Israeli economy is in the tank and almost certain to stay there. The military budget is crippling, added to which there are huge subsidies to various religious factions that have to be bought off and for building 'settlements' on land confiscated from Palestinians.

      Without US aid and US weapons the Israeli/Palestinian conflict would be a much more evenly balanced affair. Israeli hawks might actually start thinking of compromise rather than using coded references to 'transfer' - i.e. ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian population.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    11. Re:Copy of article... by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 1
      I don't know too much about this subject, but he said that "the Israeli ecconomy is entirely dependent on the US" (which may or may not be true), and you replied about US aid. These are not the same thing! The US aid could be zero and yet the Israeli economy could still be dependent on the US.

      (And incidentally if the aid is several percent of Israels GDP then I don't see how you can say "only!!!" That's a vast amount of money.)

    12. Re:Copy of article... by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Insightful


      As it appears to upset you that Israel is using what you call 'coded references' does it also upset you what the PA does?

      "The PA Ministries of Education and Sport have turned the most abhorrent murderers of Jews into role models and heroes for Palestinian youth. [For instance, a] tournament for 11-year-old boys was named for Abd Al-Baset Odeh - the terrorist who murdered 30 in the Passover Seder suicide bombing. This past summer, during the period of the US-sponsored Road Map, numerous summer camps were named for suicide bombers... As recently as September this year, PA Chairman Arafat and 13 PA leaders jointly sponsored a soccer tournament honoring arch terrorists... Each of the 24 soccer teams was named for a terrorist or other Shahids [Martyrs], including some of the most infamous murderers like Yichye Ayash, the first Hamas bomb engineer, who initiated the suicide bombings..."

      List of countries on the Israeli side: USA
      List of countries on the PA side: Most/All of the Arab world.

    13. Re:Copy of article... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      As it appears to upset you that Israel is using what you call 'coded references' does it also upset you what the PA does?

      It is clear that Sharon is the causal nexus here, as he is fond of pointing out Arafat is irrelevant.

      Sharon's strategy appear to be to deliberately provoke attacks in order to justify further provocations. He was personally responsible for starting the current round of violence with his forced entry into the Al Axir mosque.

      Sharon is personally responsible for all the deaths since. He has brought nothing but death, fear and instability to Israel.

      Every time there is a ceasefire with the militants, Sharon makes sure it ends quickly by ordering the airforce to murder some Palestinians.

      List of countries on the Israeli side: USA List of countries on the PA side: Most/All of the Arab world.

      Make that pretty much the entire world condeming Israel. At this point the only countries that support Israel in the UN are the US, Israel(!), Micronesia and the Marshall Islands.

      If Israel wants any sympathy from me they can stop confiscating Palestinan land to build settlements. Israel signed an agreement to stop building settlements at Oslo, instead of keeping the agreement they doubled the number of houses.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    14. Re:Copy of article... by hatchetman82 · · Score: 1

      or maybe without US political pressure backed by US aid, Israel could finally let its army loose on the palestinians and end the conflict a lot faster ?
      (they dont buckle under european pressure anymore, the US is pretty much all thats left)

    15. Re:Copy of article... by WNight · · Score: 1

      They've actually figured out how to degrade civilian service over just part of the planet. They'd probably have a hard time cutting France off, without hitting their allies next-door, but they can cut the middle-east off without affecting the rest of the world. It means that only large countries need to fear to "no GPS" threat. Look out Canada and Russia! (Except that 90% of Canadians are withing 200km of the USA border. Russians though...)

    16. Re:Copy of article... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      or maybe without US political pressure backed by US aid, Israel could finally let its army loose on the palestinians and end the conflict a lot faster ?

      OK how many civilians do you want to murder with that army?

      What you are advocating here is ethnic cleansing, what we called genocide in WWII.

      If Sharon ever took that path the number of people who wanted Israel to continue as a political entity would suddenly become very small.

      There is only one long term political solution that is viable. Simply erase all the clauses in Israeli law and the constitution that privillege the position of Jews over other citizens. That means ending the law of return for jews and recognizing the law of return for Palestinian refugees. Eliminate all subsidies to religious institutions and enact anti-discrimination laws.

      That is the only way that we brought the conflict in Northern Ireland to an end. If Britain had been more attentive to what was taking place in Northern Ireland in the 50s and 60s and less defferential to local politicians we would have taken the same action before they could be exploited by the radicals.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    17. Re:Copy of article... by the+morgawr · · Score: 1
      Sharon is personally responsible for all the deaths since. He has brought nothing but death, fear and instability to Israel.

      Funny you feal that way, since both Bill Clinton and Prince Bandar (of Saudi Arabia) blamed Arafat. Infact Bandar claimed that Arafat had planned the uprising months in advance and just used Sharon as an excuse. Excuse me for trusting my former President and a Saudi Prince over Arafat.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
    18. Re:Copy of article... by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that 5 million budget didn't include pay for a part-time security guard.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    19. Re:Copy of article... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Excuse me for trusting my former President and a Saudi Prince over Arafat.

      You know that really is a pretty ironic comment when you think about it. I have not met Prince Bandar, but I know the Saudi regime quite well. It is every bit as miserable as Saddam's regime in Iraq, the secret police are brutal, the courts capricious, critics of the regime tend to 'disappear'. On top of that you have the imposition of Whahabbi Islam, a miserable cult, in a form that is only slightly less severe than that of the Saudi funded Taliban.

      The Saudi regime has a big interest in making sure that the Israeli/Palestinian conflict remains nicely on the boil so that they can direct their internal conflict onto an external source.

      If you read what the Saudi government and press say about the situation inside Saudi I suspect you would have a different view of the reliability of the royal family.

      As for Clinton, you are picking and choosing. Clinton has stated on numerous occassions that the settlements are 'obstacles to peace'.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    20. Re:Copy of article... by On+Lawn · · Score: 2, Insightful


      It seems Arafat is more dependant on foreign aid than most Palestinians...

      Also, ever wonder why Israel who is seemingly the enemy of the multi-billion dollar Arab oil cartel is doing so much more culturally, scientifically, and humanitary than all of them combined? I mean, the amount of money Israel get from the US is pennies compared to the US dollars pouring into these oil rich Arab nations in aid and oil trade. But Israel has world class Universities, research institutes, and a more diverse economy.

      But those Arab dictatorships will stay in power as long as they can convince people that Israel and the US are the reasons for their problems.

    21. Re:Copy of article... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      But those Arab dictatorships will stay in power as long as they can convince people that Israel and the US are the reasons for their problems

      Absolutely, and the US has been very keen to make sure that the status quo continues for its own reasons.

      The reason that there is no democracy in the Middle East is because the CIA organized a coup to depose the only elected government there in 1953. The Iranian government was understandably outraged that the Anglo-Persian oil company refused to pay a fair price for the oil they extracted or even audit the books so they could make sure they were paid the amount they were owed.

      Rather than compromise Anglo-Persian refused to negotiate, this led to the democratically elected Iranian parliament nationalizing the oil industry. A bunch of spooks at the CIA led by the Dulles brothers decided that they would rather have Iran become a dictatorship under the Shah than risk seeing nationalism take hold in the region, possibly threatening a domino-effect of democratisation. This was acknowledged by the US Secretary of State during the Clinton administration.

      The result was a coup which imposed a brutal regime in Iran. This was successful in the short run but in the long run led to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism and a second coup led by a popular uprising. This was then hijacked as popular uprisings often are by the theocrats who currently control much of Iran's government.

      Something similar happened in Iraq, it is well established that the CIA helped Saddam remain in power for many years, providing lists of political opponents to be silenced etc.

      All told the US and Israel have both done a great deal to create the mess that they now face. Israel insists that time started sometime in 1948, sometime after the Palestinians were driven from their homes by force. The US insists that any criticism of its past covert activities is unpatriotic, illegitimate.

      Instead of facing the past the Israelis scream ANTI-SEMITE at anyone who raises it while the US screams ANTI-AMERICAN. And they hope that screaming and yelling and a sufficient supply of bullets will allow them to remain where they are and never have to make any compromise to anyone or to admit their cause to be anything less than entirely-richeous.

      You can attempt to understand the past or you can be a prisoner of it.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    22. Re:Copy of article... by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      Model airplanes are completely different than helicopters, and flying an airplane one direction and turning around just isn't that difficult.

      However, it's wrong for a different reason. It's wrong because it's been done already. Except for takeoff and landing, Rotomotion has been doing this for months.

    23. Re:Copy of article... by the+morgawr · · Score: 1
      > Clinton has stated on numerous occassions that the settlements are 'obstacles to peace'.

      Yes, and then he got the Israeli's to agree to disband them, and give the palistinians most of the land and a capitol in East Jeruselum, etc. But Arafat walked away and turned to violence. Both Clinton and Prince Bandar (who was advising Arafat at the time) have blamed the resulting violence on Arafat.

      I'm not saying the Saudi's are always credible but since they are almost always supportive of the Palistinians it's pretty telling when they blame Arafat.

      On similar thread how can you claim Sharon is the nexus of the problem? There was terrorism before he was elected.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
    24. Re:Copy of article... by On+Lawn · · Score: 1
      The reason that there is no democracy in the Middle East is because the CIA organized a coup to depose the only elected government there in 1953. The Iranian government was understandably outraged that the Anglo-Persian oil company refused to pay a fair price for the oil they extracted or even audit the books so they could make sure they were paid the amount they were owed.

      Instead of facing the past the Israelis scream ANTI-SEMITE at anyone who raises it while the US screams ANTI-AMERICAN.

      The US insists that any criticism of its past covert activities is unpatriotic, illegitimate.

      Bush said just about the same thing, and no one called him anti-american for it.

      "Sixty years of Western nations excusing and accommodating the lack of freedom in the Middle East did nothing to make us safe, because in the long run, stability cannot be purchased at the expense of liberty."


      Its fun to point out that the Middle East policy of GWB has been influence heavily by (drum roll...) Noam Chomsky. Rumsfeld came from the Chomskian left, and its easy to see his influence in their policies.

      No longer, if Bush has his way, will the US set up dictatorships and arm them even to genocide. The US will do its own dirty work. Well maybe not the conclusion that Chomsky wanted, its most definately an outcropping of his detailed deconstruction of the US's foriegn modus-operandi for the past half century.

      While Noam wants frigid US isolationism and white-guilt driven capitulation, Rumsfeld and Bush saw the need to continue to be a player the world, if nothing but to clean up the messes made previously. And now we have a US that takes a bloody nose but still tries to help build Iraq even after the Red Cross and UN filter away their aides in the country.

      Parting Shot: You can attempt to understand the present or you can make a straw man and chop it up all you want.
    25. Re:Copy of article... by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      This is 5 Million NIS (New Israeli Shekels), exchange rate to the US $ is about 4.6 meaning that they spent approx $1.1 million USD

    26. Re:Copy of article... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Bush said just about the same thing, and no one called him anti-american for it. "Sixty years of Western nations excusing and accommodating the lack of freedom in the Middle East did nothing to make us safe, because in the long run, stability cannot be purchased at the expense of liberty."

      Bush fails to come to grips with the fact that the US has done more than passively accept dictatorships it has actively worked to destroy democracies. The US did more than passively keep the Shah of Iran and General Pinochet in power, the US instigated and executed the replacement of democratic governments with dictators.

      Its fun to point out that the Middle East policy of GWB has been influence heavily by (drum roll...) Noam Chomsky.

      Actually the phrase 'those who are not with us are against us' is actually due to Lenin who appears to be a far more significant influence on this administration's ideology. It is pretty amusing to see an allegedly right wing government spewing so much Marxist ideology without appearing to know where it comes from.

      No longer, if Bush has his way, will the US set up dictatorships and arm them even to genocide.

      US politicians have always clothed themselves in the mantle of liberty and justice even when they were arming the very dictators you refer to.

      I very much doubt that we will see Bush show the slightest inclination to challenge Putin over Chetchnya, or seriously incommode the Saudi, Kewati or other gulf royal famillies. He certainly will not question anything that Sharon does in Israel. So what we are left with is the same old US foreign policy of propping up 'good' dictators and condeming the bad.

      Since being exposed as a liar on the WMD issue it is difficult to accept any claim that Bush makes with anything other than skepticism. If we cannot trust Bush to make an honest factual statement about the present we can hardly be expected to believe his promises for the future.

      Bush also promised to be 'a uniter not a divider', not only has he governed as the most Partisan president since the civil war he has divided the US from her traditional allies in NATO and at the UN.

      Parting Shot: You can attempt to understand the present or you can make a straw man and chop it up all you want.

      Let see, I read the world press every day. Bush has admitted he does not even read the US press. I have a reasonable understanding of recent history, Bush displays absolutely none. If you look back through my slashdot posts you will see that I correctly predicted a quagmire in post invasion Iraq. Bush predicted troops being wellcomed with flowers and his only post-invasion plans were for the victory parade and photo-op.

      Of course having read the history of the British occupation of Iraq I knew that we only held Iraq by killing over 50,000 natives, mostly through punishment bombing of recalcitrant vilages. This despite liberating Iraq from the hated Turkish oppression. I now hear that the Gernerals who have taken charge of Iraq from Bremer are proposing much the same strategy.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    27. Re:Copy of article... by On+Lawn · · Score: 1
      Bush fails to come to grips with the fact that the US has done more than passively accept dictatorships it has actively worked to destroy democracies.

      What was that I said about strawmen again? Oh yeah, hack away at your pleasure.

      the phrase 'those who are not with us are against us' is actually due to Lenin

      Oh its been around much longer than that. I'm always amused at the catastrophic (yet short sighted) simularities people place Bush to Hitler, Stalin, and Lenin.

      US politicians have always clothed themselves in the mantle of liberty and justice even when they were arming the very dictators you refer to.

      As has Europe. Why look at what Chirac is doing in the Le Cote D'Ivoire right now. He's bullying reporters and anyone who is offering opposition to the current government. Putin put a man in jail for opposing him. All in the name of Justice, and as you mentioned, Checnya.

      But the difference is that while I'm sure the UN and EU would be just as happy if a new dictator restored order to Iraq (you can't tell me they wouldn't), Bush is sticking it out with his "democracy or bust" endeavor. After all the EU was Saddam's main supporter all along. The EU is Arafat's main supporter (refer again to link about Arafat keeping all the money to himself).

      From "The Event of the Age"...

      Iraq is also becoming a reflecting pool of the world at large. Millions are slowly learning how different the United States is from its critics in Europe. France will threaten the awful regime in Libya but only about matters of monetary recompense, in the same manner that money led both it and Germany to trade with Saddam Hussein after 1991 and haggle over oil concessions for the next half century. Neither state would remove a dictator, much less pledge lives and nearly $90 billion to create a democracy in the Middle East. All that is too concrete, too absolute, too unsophisticated for the philosophes, who would always prefer slurring a democracy to castigating some third-world bloody ideologue. The Europeans, remember, are now grandstanding about the need for American "transparency" in the distribution of their paltry few millions in Iraq in a manner that they never demanded of their billions once dumped onto a corrupt Palestinian Authority.

      There are bombings regularly in Spain; over 10,000 died in France due to either a defect in its socialist government or indeed in its very national character; and Russia obliterated Grosny. But a single death or bomb in Baghdad alone seems to merit condemnation from the Europeans, whose leaders seem incapable of using the words "victory" and "freedom," much less "sacrifice" and "liberation." They may lavish awards and money on a Jimmy Carter or Susan Sontag, who criticize their own country's efforts in the midst of a deadly war; but the true moralists are those who risk taking on tyrants, not those who carp from the sidelines that such courageous efforts are sometimes messy. It seems to be a rite of old age for American progressives these days to travel to Europe and trash their alma mater as they troll for the applause of a smug, cynical audience, the more boldly when they are not answered and confronted by independent thinkers abroad. But such showboating is going to be increasingly difficult once a liberal and humane society emerges in Iraq.

      These Europeans like multilateral solutions not out of principle so much as because the tortuous process of implementing them creates the illusion that, in the meantime, nothing must be done. Hence, by the time the U.N. acts, most Bosnians or Rwandans or Kuwaitis are long gone, a sort of "talk, talk/die, die policy." Had a Chirac or Schroeder said something like, "With confidence in our values and with right, as we see, it on our side, we shall fight alongside our democratic ally, the United States, and together remove this Dark Age governmen

    28. Re:Copy of article... by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      As it appears to upset you that Israel is using what you call 'coded references' does it also upset you what the PA does?

      Yes, but it doesn't justify the current imprisonment and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian population.

      List of countries on the Israeli side: USA
      List of countries on the PA side: Most/All of the Arab world.

      What are you trying to prove? Your complete inaptitude for perceiving reality in a fair and balanced way.

    29. Re:Copy of article... by gedanken · · Score: 1

      CMU, MIT, Georgia Tech, and the other big name robotic schools hold a competition every year that show cases just this; autonomous helicopters that can traverse a course without the aid of humans. They use onboard cameras and gps, just like this thing does. This is hardly a unique idea. I think what is special about it is that it is coming from a company (not a university) and that it works.

    30. Re:Copy of article... by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      Yes, and then he got the Israeli's to agree to disband them, and give the palistinians most of the land and a capitol in East Jeruselum, etc. But Arafat walked away and turned to violence. Both Clinton and Prince Bandar (who was advising Arafat at the time) have blamed the resulting violence on Arafat.

      Come on, you're not really going to try that tired argument again are you? Have you ever seen the plan that offered to give the Palestinians most of the land? It was non-contigous land in which Israeli Roads divided towns, military controlled roads. It also strategically kept key water sources in Israeli control.

      There was nothing generous about Bahrak's so calle d Generous Offer, in bare statistics it sounded good, drawn out on paper it was garbage.

      As far as who's fault the violence was, it's not as if it rests solely on any one individual's shoulders, but honestly, can you call Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount anything but provocatory?

    31. Re:Copy of article... by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      Wow, it is so nice to see someone else supporting a One State solution. People should pay attention to this post, it is absolutely on the money.

      Short term, different routes may need to be followed, but as a long term solution, it is not only the morally sound choice, it is the only practical one.

      Responding to the grandparent and the idea that genocide is a more appropriate route and commentary about not buckling to European pressure. Do you honestly believe Israel would not buckle to European pressure if it weren't leaning so hard on the US? Do you honestly believe a country can survive the moral bankrupcy that is genocide?

    32. Re:Copy of article... by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      You really think Sharon started the whole intifada by walking into a mosque?

      So if Arafat walks into a temple, Israel can then blame him for starting 'it'?

    33. Re:Copy of article... by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      Hello, Mcfly, anyone home?

      The Camp David accords were a start! It was Israelis making compromises, rather than saying "we want it all."

      Did Arafat make even one compromise? No, he wanted everything. All of Jerusalem, all WB and G, eviction of all Jewish settlers, and right of return.

      Clinton actually lost his patience with Arafat, for not making any reasonable offers, just rejecting everything put on the table by the Israelis.

    34. Re:Copy of article... by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      All told the US and Israel have both done a great deal to create the mess that they now face. Israel insists that time started sometime in 1948, sometime after the Palestinians were driven from their homes by force. The US insists that any criticism of its past covert activities is unpatriotic, illegitimate.

      Actually, it's the Arab League that rejects history before 1948. Otherwise, they'd have to admit they murdered 100's of Jews in the Hebron riots in the 1920's, as well as evict hundreds more. Interestingly enough, if a Jewish descendent goes back to Hebron, they're called a land-grabbing thief.

      If Jews can't go back to their lands they were evicted from, then Palestinians should lose their right of return too.

      Instead of facing the past the Israelis scream ANTI-SEMITE at anyone who raises it while the US screams ANTI-AMERICAN. And they hope that screaming and yelling and a sufficient supply of bullets will allow them to remain where they are and never have to make any compromise to anyone or to admit their cause to be anything less than entirely-richeous.

      You just lost any credibility, that's such a FSCKing myth and only claimed by idiots like yourself. Israel faces criticism ALL the time, the only time politicians cry ANTI-SEMITE is when someone extends the conflict to include "The Jews". For example, that guy that said "The Jews" were evil because there were some Jews behind the Bolshevic revolution.

      Unfortunately, this post will most likely be modded as "off-topic", yet your equally off-topic post will be modded up. Go figure.

    35. Re:Copy of article... by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      You're either a racist or an idiot. I'll give you the chance to pick which you are.

      Jordan has a law preventing Jews from becoming citizens. PA has a little-known law preventing any Jew from owning land (under penalty of death, to boot).

      Either admit you're an idiot for not knowing these facts (probably due to your pro-Palestinian media sources).

      Or admit you're racist, in that it's okay to discriminate against Jews, but not okay if Jews discriminate against non-Jews.

    36. Re:Copy of article... by bendude · · Score: 1

      As it appears to upset you that Israel is using what you call 'coded references' does it also upset you what the PA does?

      Bzzzt! - You are responding to someone's observations of what is being done with the proceeds of their own taxes. How about you stop being such an offensive embicile and face up to your own actions rather that complaining about what the "others" are doing. We're talking about Israel here and trying to change the subject wont change that.

      List of countries on the Israeli side: USA

      Oh, I'm sorry, but your poor little me routine is about to take a hit. I am an Australian, living and paying taxes in Australia. One of my greatest anguishes is that my government uses my taxes to support the IDF and Mossad terrorists through electronic signals intelligence. (Amongst other things - how about when our PM denied Israel even had any Nukes)

      So, if you want to rely on your birthright and your status as God's children, don't forget the prophecy that says you will all soon stand with the ENTIRE world coming to get you.

      Alternatively - join us. We're the human race and all we want is peace.
      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
    37. Re:Copy of article... by the+morgawr · · Score: 1
      > can you call Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount anything but provocatory

      No I can't. I was a heavy critic of his doing it. However his claim that if the Bahrak proposal had been accepted, Israeli's wouldn't be allowed at mutual holy sites was "validated" in the eyes of many Israeli voters and helped his party to win the election.

      Fact is though, suicide bombings and the targeting of innocent Israeli civilians occured before the visit. To say that Sharon's visit caused the violence is to ignore modern history.

      > Have you ever seen the plan that offered to give the Palestinians most of the land?

      Yes I read the entirity of what was available to the public.

      It was non-contigous land

      It was also more then what had been pushed for at Oslo; every scholar on the situation was shocked that Israel had gone so far. Makeing the land continuous is imposible, as that would mean making Israel discontinuous, and giving up land that Jews have lived in for over 100 years. Each portion of the land WAS continous (i.e. the Gaza Strip was a continuous section, and the West Bank was a continuous section).

      It also strategically kept key water sources in Israeli control.

      At least try looking at this from both sides here, as that is the nature of compromise. Those water resources are needed by the Israeli's too. The agreement gave the Palistinians access to them. Furthermore the Palistinians have both Egypt and Jordan to help them in a crisis, Israel does not.

      As a further note, both the West Bank and Gaza were abandoned to Israel by Jordan and Egypt because they didn't want to have to integrate the Palistinians into their countries. Israel has offered the Palistinians the land on the same terms it offered Egypt and Jordan (and which Egypt and Joran accepted); Arafat turned it down, and resorted to violence. President Clinton has publicly called Arafat a liar, and places the blame for the failure of the process completely on Arafat. Dennis Ross, the chief US negotiator, has said that Arafat was unwilling to accept ANY peace proposal.

      Whether you want to believe it or not, Arafat is the barier to peace. He blocks the actions of his Prime Minster to reign in terrorist groups, and he threatens to kill Palistinian leaders who are trying to work for peace. Arafat does not care about the Palistinians, he cares about his own power.

      Yes the Palistinian people deserve the right of self determination. Yes they deserve to live in freedom. Unfortunately for them, they are political pawns, and peace benefits only them and the Israeli people.

      Since you care so much about helping the Palistinians, how come you only want to blame Israel? You arn't up in arms about the fact that there is a separate UN agency (UNRWA) to deal with the Palistinian "problem". For those who don't know: unlike the UNHCR, the UNRWA is not charged with providing a permanant solution to the situation or helping the refugees but simply maintaining and supporting the refugee camps. Infact under the watchful eye of the UNRWA, the number of refugees has gone from under a million to over four million. In the same 50 year time period the UNHCR has solved many other refugee problems, and never resorted to permanant refugee camps.

      Of course, the implied purpose of the UNRWA is to prevent the ultimate resolution of the situation and instead allow it to fester indefinantly so that Arab dictators and Western politicians can use the Palistinians as political bargaining chips.

      I want to see a resolution to this as much as anyone else, but at the same time I want the Palistinians to be able to enjoy freedom and practice self determination. With Arafat around that's not going to happen. In my book the next two steps are ending the UN descrimination, and having Arafat yield his power compleatly to a Prime Minister.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
    38. Re:Copy of article... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Thanks for the followup! After I posted "MIT", I kept wondering if it was really from Georgia Tech. I guess the tickle in the back of my brain was because I probably read something from both.

      Again, thanks.

    39. Re:Copy of article... by GrodinTierce · · Score: 1
      If you're right about those laws, then I would absolutely condemn them. However, to anticipate a commonly used argument, the fact that Jews should be allowed to own land and live in the Palestinian territories does not equate to support for settlement. Any Jews (or anyone else for that matter) who wish to live in Palestine should live under Palestinian rule (and vice-versa in Israel).

      Also, I'm sure you're aware that there are similar restrictions in Israel about not selling land to non-Jews and not permitting non-Jews to move to certain municpalities.

      Ultimately, I am opposed to any religious discrimination (in any direction), but it seems to me that "Jews discriminat[ing] against non-Jews" is pretty much unavoidable as a long as Israel continues to define itself as a Jewish state. That's why the only long-term solution is one state for two peoples. Ironically, the Wall (if it continues its present course) is going to finally remove any remote possibility of a two-state solution.

      --


      Tierce
      Who sponsors your feelings?
    40. Re:Copy of article... by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      Okay, we actually agree on many points.

      If Israel must accept a right of return, then Palestine must as well. If the Jewish settlers are to be evicted from their homes in West Bank and Gaza, then one should admit that this act is ethnic cleansing, and also denies any right of return for Palestinians.

      Finally, if Israel is racist by nature as a Jewish state, that is a perfectly acceptable statement as long as one considers all Islamic states equally racist by nature.

      Seriously, there is nothing unique about Israel compared to the other members of the Arab League, in terms of racist laws or human rights records. But to see such disproportionate criticism and aggression against it are very illogical indeed.

    41. Re:Copy of article... by sigxcpu · · Score: 1

      you are coorect. my msitake its several percent of the government's budget not the GDP.

      --
      As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
    42. Re:Copy of article... by Glock27 · · Score: 1
      They've actually figured out how to degrade civilian service over just part of the planet.

      Interesting, but the discussion was revolving around the military version. It is less than clear that the U.S. can affect foreign military GPS capability without interfering with U.S. capability.

      Interesting question though. ;-)

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    43. Re:Copy of article... by GrodinTierce · · Score: 1
      Would Israel really be willing to accept returning Palestinians if Palestine did as well? There would be far more Palestinians, both absolutely and as a percentage, who would immigrate to Israel than Jews to Palestine. Are you, as a supporter of Israel, prepared to countenance its destruction as a Jewish state?

      Also, I thought I made clear that Jewish settlers needn't, and shouldn't, be evicted, but should live as normal citzens under Palestinian rule, with no special privleges (i.e. Jewish-only access roads, confiscation of Palestinian land, destruction of Palestinian property to create security buffer zones), just as Arabs should in Israel.

      While I agree with you that Israel is no better or worse than much of the Arab, or even the world for that matter, regarding racism and/or human rights, I've always been under the impression that Israel doesn't see itself as a Third World nation. While Israeli democracy and civil society are far from perfect, they are also far ahead of the rest of the Middle East in many ways. If Israel simply declared itself a theocracy, or if 'transfer' should ever come to pass, then it would be seen as no better or worse than any other Third World failure. But when Israel touts itself as the Middle East's only democracy, and when its courts reign in the excesses of the government, its failings, and hypocrisy, are starkly highlighted for all the world to see. I seem to remember something about Israel being "a light unto nations".

      Finally, I would be curious to hear your views on the Wall, particularly how it is effecting the prospects of a one-state vs. two-state solution.

      --


      Tierce
      Who sponsors your feelings?
  9. too bad by gibi · · Score: 1

    Don't they feel stupid now that they just build one of these.
    Hey, they even could have used the second one to find the first one.

  10. Producing a unique design. by HeX314 · · Score: 1

    Interesting to note that Steadicopter claims that their helicopter is unique and there is no other of its kind in the world.

    This is fine and dandy until they try to mass produce a "unique" item. Is it really a good thing to produce a unique aircraft, or is it better to follow suit and produce something that you know works.

    1. Re:Producing a unique design. by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      if we only produce things we know work...

      what would we ever have thats new an innovative?

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    2. Re:Producing a unique design. by iii_rjm · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a dictionary would help you out here. The word you want is to look up is "prototype"

    3. Re:Producing a unique design. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      There always has to be a 'first' one! I'm sure They have blueprints, software code, ect., but often the little 'tweaks' that made it WORK are unique to that machine...often even engineers stumble upon a solution and have to figure out WHY they got it working! Without the hardware they're set back months.

      For $1.5m it must have been a mini-uav, not a fullsize heilo. That would make it farily portable with a normal 2.5 ton truck. As far as security, normally a locked building would suffice ...a $1 million dollar project is still mostly a hobby project...with most of the money wrapped up in developlment. Like another poster said, there are lots of companies working on this concept, but very few have their level of working product. It's the difference between mearly building a bot to solve the inverted pendulum problem and prototyping a segway...getting a few extra 9's of reliablity is the WORK part of innovation, not a magic bullet.

      seriously, Remember that their police worry about suicide bombers not petty robbers, and if someone is willing to knock down walls... Before you complain about security, look at /.! if billy g wanted he could pay a group of para militaries with crowbars to shut taco's servers down [firewall meet sledgehammer!]...is VALinux perpared for such an event? Not really, stuff like that doesn't happen that much here...it's fairly extreme. And most hosting facilities are either out-of-the-way or in industrial areas where the noise wouldn't be heard and cops have more pressing things to do...Look at the repo man business...we're not really very safe are we?

  11. I blame Roy Schieder by iainl · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet he uses it for looking through apartment windows again, too.

    Mind you, between him, Jan Michel Vincent and Famke Janssen its a wonder there are any prototype helicopters that haven't been stolen.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    1. Re:I blame Roy Schieder by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Under the spreading chestnut tree, I sold you and you sold me.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  12. Stolen or Sold? by mallfouf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder is they're claining it to be stolen just to cover the fact that it might have been sold to someone else. Those military projects from israel can't be sold to anyone unless it's approved by the US, so this one might have gone without the approval.

    1. Re:Stolen or Sold? by ojQj · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A similar idea occured to me: Maybe it didn't pass the tests at all and now they have to find a way to cover for it.

      1. Make contract for expensive difficult piece of technology
      2. Say it passed all of its tests whether it did or not
      3. Let it disappear/sell it to the highest secret bidder/be "stolen"
      4. Have the insurance pay out
      5. Make double the price of the original contract on this, and claim bragging rights to a piece of technology you may or may not have ever successfully completed.

      I rather doubt this is the way it happened, but it makes an interesting theory.

    2. Re:Stolen or Sold? by lfourrier · · Score: 1

      did it occur to you, or where you remembering
      "Remo Williams: The Adventure Begins", a 1985 movie.

    3. Re:Stolen or Sold? by Maset · · Score: 1

      Why would they do that? They sold it to a military/NGO/illegal group.... saying to the world that it exists and that they have lost it isn't going to get them ANYTHING

    4. Re:Stolen or Sold? by jd · · Score: 1
      It depends. If it's made using US technology, the US DoD has a habit of claiming that the device -is- US soil and therefore cannot be exported without permission.


      (This happened when one of the British nuclear research facilities wanted to sell an old Cray X-MP to University College, London.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Stolen or Sold? by ojQj · · Score: 1

      Never seen or even heard of that movie. I'd have been about seven when it came out. Care to tell us what it's about?

    6. Re:Stolen or Sold? by lfourrier · · Score: 1

      some cop is "killed" and become a secret martial art expert helping a secret organisation fight evil, notably some mega corp that destroy some star war satelite they where supposed to build. But they just build some wood fake, and hope to cash governement funds and insurance money to help them rebuild their super high tech laboratory that was desroyed with the satelite (or so I remember)

    7. Re:Stolen or Sold? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Those military projects from israel can't be sold to anyone unless it's approved by the US, so this one might have gone without the approval.

      That's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. Israel is a sovereign nation. They are restricted in what they can due with funding from the U.S. and with U.S. built equipment. They can do whatever they damn well please with their own stuff.

      And don't try to claim that Israeli technology is dependent on American brain power. If you say that, you're the most ignorant person in the world.

      What's the U.S. gonna do if Israel breaks the rules? Invade them? Be realistic, we'd be blown to oblivion trying something like that. The U.S. can sit and shake it's finger at Israel, and Israel is free to say "How about you just fuck off friendly, 'kay?"

    8. Re:Stolen or Sold? by deliciousmonster · · Score: 1

      Israel telling the US to "fuck off friendly" would be exactly the right thing for them to do. The US wouldn't invade, because we don't have the military to do it right now. Plus, there's an extremely powerful pro-Israel lobby in Washington.

      They would risk, however, losing 4-6 billion (last count) dollars a year in the US funds that keep it alive. It's not too huge a step for the American public to see the benefits of that money staying here, and not too far off that we can't vote out the members of congress who are beholden to that lobby.

      --
      I have a plan. Using mainly spoons, we'll tunnel our way out of the city...
    9. Re:Stolen or Sold? by pclminion · · Score: 1
      I might be biased, but the truth is I also have a degree of direct experience that most people who comment on the situation lack...

      It's too common for people to label those who disagree with them "idiots," so I won't do the same to you. However I would point out that by defining bias as "an opinion of opposite polarity to my own" you are clearly labelling YOURSELF as biased, also. Unless you are willing to admit that you're a total hypocrit.

      I think the ONLY unbiased thing that can be said about the Israeli/Palestinian situation is that it's very sad. We don't disagree on that. But if you define my support (which is not total, by the way) for the Israeli side as "biased," then you're just as guilty as I am.

      As far as Israel not having a chance... You must be kidding. I suppose you call what is happening in Iraq right now "victory?" Are you trying to tell me we'd have more success against Israel? The only way to decisively win would be to use nukes. Ain't gonna happen.

    10. Re:Stolen or Sold? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      They also wouldn't do it because we provide them with the military hardware that keeps them from being utterly destroyed by the people they forced out with their occupation and continually antagonize. Without US aid, Israel would be nothing more than a historical footnote. They don't have the capacity to stand on their own.

    11. Re:Stolen or Sold? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Responded to only for the benefit of those who don't know any better. The person who wrote this comment is one of those, but will probably never bother to learn more on that which they spout so vociferously about.

      Ah, not only anonymous and a coward, but ignorant too. It's not about Jews (as pertaining to religion), it's about Israelis. Only the ignorant and misinformed confuse the two. Much of Israel is secular, especially the military. It's like using Islamic and Arabic interchangeably. Only the ignorant do it. One is specifically a religious term. The other is a nationality.

      They beat off the Arabs in several wars, yes, but not without US help. Without the US, Britain, and the former USSR, Israel would be a pipe dream. Learn your WWII history. Where do you think Israel got their funding and military hardware to begin with? Where do you think they purchase a majority of it now? They have no land on which to build major industry, hence they have to buy almost everything they need.

      As for nukes that they've developed, you're wrong again. While they do have nuclear capacity, they did not and could not have done it by themselves. The US turned a blind eye to their covert development (what is now public record) with the help of France. France procured heavy water from Norway and violated the purchase agreement by secretly transporting it to Israel. They also flew in the major components to build Israel's first nuclear reactor.

      But of course you'd add racist overtones to your message. If people are thinking I'm a racist, they're more than likely not thinking that I'm right or wrong based on the actual facts of the argument, whether or not I am. It's a childish tactic, though it does work to some degree. Those it works on are not those I'm interested in reaching as an audience though, so it's neither here nor there whether it works, really.

      Methinks thou dost protest too much. Generally the insults people throw at others are those that hit closest to their own home. It's funny how things work on the internet, because you never really know what the person on the other end looks like. For all you know, I could be black. But you don't, and so you make stupid assumptions instead of dealing strictly with the facts. :)

      I know, I know, don't feed the trolls. :)

  13. Server stolen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    apparently they stole the globes webserver too ...

  14. Let's just say this now by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our helicopter-stealing overlords.

    Besides, if this helo is so unique that no one else has ever managed to build something like it, then any attempt to sell it or trade it will definitely show up pretty clearly, right?

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
  15. Who Would Want This? by Davak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stolen? There are only a few superpowers in the world that have the technology to maintain and use such a device.

    Possible reasons:
    - Ransom
    - One time suicide mission
    - To cause Israel to lose face (and 5 mil)
    - Sale (blah, blah... profit)

    It's going to take a very impressive effort to get something like this out of the country without being noticed.

    1. Re:Who Would Want This? by Ugodown · · Score: 1

      You forgot one: -FUN! Imagine all the fun things to do with it. Deaming up ideas like "lets use it to terrorize the neighbors annoying dog".

      --
      --- to swing on the spiral...
    2. Re:Who Would Want This? by MikShapi · · Score: 1

      .. I think you forgot the obvious:

      FREE PUBLICITY by going on the news and /.

      Remember the books marketers read to their kids?
      - Bill and the Pie
      - Bill and the Blue Screen of Death
      - Sir Mcbride and the Incredibly Big Monster?
      followed by the rest of the "Free global advertising in a nutshell" children's literature series?

      --
      -
    3. Re:Who Would Want This? by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

      What about another old motive? It didn't work! Test results my a**.

      Same thing happened to a science fair project of mine...

    4. Re:Who Would Want This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "One time suicide mission"

      An unmanned vehicle is a poor choice for a suicide misson :)

      And suicide missions are usually a once-in-a-lifetime things, I mean you don't meet that often with an old Japanese who states that he did lots of Kamikaze missions :)

    5. Re:Who Would Want This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There are only a few superpowers in the world that have the technology to maintain and use such a device.

      ???

      Do you know anything at all about (model) helicopter service? (if you check the picture it's clearly a model - with ~1.5-2m (~5-7 feet) rotor dish I'd say)

      The mechanical service any kid above the age of 12 could do. The technology to service it? A bit of fuel, oil, recharging its batteries and the occasional rotor-blade angle trimming. Do you actually believe yourself it needs a "superpower" to service a device like this?

      Besides, the claim this is "the first" is a lie (unless qualified with "commerecially available"). I was involved with the *exact* same kind of research, where we indeed had devices working - more than a decade ago...

    6. Re:Who Would Want This? by Leto-II · · Score: 1

      It's going to take a very impressive effort to get something like this out of the country without being noticed.

      Uhm... It's a helicopter. It flies. Without a pilot. Pretty much completely automatically. It's not likely to be transported through the red "I have something to declare" lane at customs.

      --
      Do not anger the worm.
    7. Re:Who Would Want This? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      I was involved with the *exact* same kind of research, where we indeed had devices working - more than a decade ago...

      Yeah, but notice the distinct lack of balsa wood or rubberbands on this model.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    8. Re:Who Would Want This? by bkhl · · Score: 1

      To me, the obvious reason for it is to stop Israel for using this to terrorise civilians, which is what they will undoubtedly do with it when it's finished.

      Even if the development is just delayed for half a year or so, the perpetrators may have saved hundreds or even thousands of lives.

    9. Re:Who Would Want This? by Pentagram · · Score: 1

      I expect a couple of students nicked it on the way back from the pub.

    10. Re:Who Would Want This? by Dusabre · · Score: 1, Funny

      Superpowers?

      It takes a superpower to carry out a burglary? Of a small movable object?

      That explains who carries out all the robberies in my area.

      THE CHINESE

      And the superpower that carried out this awe-inspiring Mission Impossible feat of stealing a small movable object, is going to:
      a) Ransom the heli - because superpowers need every million they can get;
      b) Cause Isreal to lose face - because China, Russia and the US know that the theft of a small heli from a private company is a major loss of face;
      c) Carry out a suicide mission - where's the suicide if this automated? And can't you already buy drone aircraft...so why bother with a heli?;
      d) Sale - see pt. a)

      Getting something of the Isreal is not going to be a serious problem, they can't keep guns, explosives and terrorits out of the country.

    11. Re:Who Would Want This? by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      I hope it was the Palestinians.

      They should steal all of the US's military items from Israel too, but you would need a million people working for a million days to do that

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    12. Re:Who Would Want This? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should have split your research time between helicopters and "humor", and spent less time perfecting "condescension". Bah, why am I replying to an AC, you obviously perfected neither. :P

      Why isn't it on the market? Guess what area we did reasearch in...

      The wrong area?

      kisses.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    13. Re:Who Would Want This? by kcelery · · Score: 1

      You've forgotten Pizza Hut. Its a perfect piece of pizza delivery machine. Still sizzling hot when the chopper landed.

    14. Re:Who Would Want This? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Which one deserves support?

      Neither, we should withold support from both.

      We should not give one further cent to Israel or guarantee one cent in further loans until it stops building settlements in the West Bank and Gaza.

      We should not fund the Palestinian authority if the international comunity determines it is not living up to its undertakings.

      Neither side should be allowed to be the judge of its own cause. It is pretty easy to determine that Israel is failling to keep its commitments by looking at satelite photographs. It is much harder to determine whether there is a good faith effort to suppress terrorists.

      As for the other histrionics, I see no legitimacy in any state that declares itself to be 'for' one section of the population. I do not see any difference between zionists calling for arabs to be driven into the sea or arabs calling for zionists to be driven into the sea. Currently the situation is that zionist racists drove a large number of palestinians from their homes in 1948 and continue to deny their right to return, meanwhile the state has confiscated their property and declared that it is to only be occupied by jews from now on.

      What I see here is projection, the arab hysterics you complain of are in essence merely a threat to do to the jewish population what was done to the palestinians. Unless and until you recognize both threats as equally evil you will never find peace.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    15. Re:Who Would Want This? by retinaburn · · Score: 1

      yes it would be hard ...if only the device had some sort of automated transportation scheme built in. :)

    16. Re:Who Would Want This? by The+Mayor · · Score: 1

      Yes, the last time a pilotless aircraft was used in a suicide mission everything went swimmingly!

      --
      --Be human.
    17. Re:Who Would Want This? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Exactly what I thought. It's nothing more than a RC helicopter with some bells and whistles. Maybe sat-nav, night/day/ir imaging and a self-destruct mechansism (if it has military uses).

      Gimmie 10 or 20 grand and I'd build you one. The only thing that might be complex is if it can navigate itself, but on a heli that's much easier than a plane. You could do it on Logo if you were perverted enough.

    18. Re:Who Would Want This? by WNight · · Score: 1

      One party in Israeli politics issues unreasonable statements. Hell, one party in Canadian politics believes they can fly through the power of meditation. Doesn't mean it's government policy.

      Those statements for the Arab governments were not only by the ruling party, but they were obviously intended because they were followed shortly by full-blown military invasion.

      See the difference?

      And as for the number of civilians killed, the Israeli retributions, while not the best way of dealing with anything, at least target terrorists. Those terrorists surround themselves with civilians, and the civilians support this action, so there really isn't a way to avoid it.

      The Palestinian suicide bombers on the other hand seek out malls and busses of absolutely no military or strategic value, in order to kill as many civilians as possible.

      See the difference?

      You're blinded by propoganda, showing evil white people killing the poor little brown people.

      It's really not race related. It's pretty much all about countries and people who embrace a religion whose leaders have declared that all Jews must die and that if you kill jews, you will be a martyr and live the good life in 'heaven'. The real case is pretty much religious nutballs versus a people fighting for their life. If the Israelis gave the Palestinians their land (which land, the land captured when the Israelis were attacked, or all of Israel?) they wouldn't be happy, they'd just keep following their religious leaders insistence that they kill Jews. They'd simply have a closer place to do it from.

    19. Re:Who Would Want This? by marktoml · · Score: 1

      >It's going to take a very impressive effort to get something like this out of the country without being noticed.

      Let it fly itself out :)

    20. Re:Who Would Want This? by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      Currently the situation is that zionist racists drove a large number of palestinians from their homes in 1948 and continue to deny their right to return

      As opposed to the slightly larger number of Jewish refugees which were driven from their homes in surrounding Arab countries, and are still denied the right of return.

      Will you at least admit the suicide bombings are racist, as they primarily target only Jews?

      If you cannot admit this, then logically you must admit that the Zionists that drove Palestinians from their homes weren't racist because they were attacked first by their Arab neighbors.

    21. Re:Who Would Want This? by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
      You're blinded by propoganda, showing evil white people killing the poor little brown people.

      Dude, not even close. People keep trying to make this into a racial issue when it's not.

      Have you ever seen pictures of Arafat or any other Palestinians? They're all just as white as most European and Arab Jews.

      I don't know about other countries, but in the US, Middle Eastern peoples are included under the Caucasian category. But besides that, Palestinians are just as white as most other people are.

      No, this can't be reduced to a simple color-of-skin argument, which is what some people try to do (calling it an Apartheid Wall, for example).

    22. Re:Who Would Want This? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      One party in Israeli politics issues unreasonable statements. Hell, one party in Canadian politics believes they can fly through the power of meditation. Doesn't mean it's government policy.

      Err it certainly does when it is the Prime Minister's party.

      And as for the number of civilians killed, the Israeli retributions, while not the best way of dealing with anything, at least target terrorists.

      Hogwash, they don't care who they kill. That is the reason that we now have Israeli fighter pilots refusing to fly. That is an absolutely unheard of situation.

      An occupying force has no right under international law to commit reprisals against civilians under occupation. These are considered war crimes.

      If Israel was serious about peace they would have stopped building settlements after they agreed to do so in Oslo. Instead they doubled the number. 70% of Israelis agree that the settlements should be dismantled. There are even large numbers of settlers who are willing to trade for an appartnemtn in Israel, they only moved to the occupied territories in the first place because of government subsidies.

      Hamas and Sharon have the same goal here, maintain the status quo. Sharon was the champion of the settler movement and he is not going to back down. Hamas do not want a two state solution, they want to wait until the Palestinian population outnumbers the jewish and then they will start demanding equal citizenship rights in a greater Israel. in the meantime each lunatic faction will do everything in its power prevent a peace settlement.

      Likud and Hamas are two sides of the same fascist coin.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    23. Re:Who Would Want This? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Me to. I have no problem cheering on the underdogs, especially when they're fighting an occupying army funded by one of the last superpowers in the world with no signs of backing down.

    24. Re:Who Would Want This? by BZ · · Score: 1

      > zionist racists drove a large number of
      > palestinians from their homes in 1948 ... by making said Palestinians religious leaders loudly incite them to leave "to clear the way for the victorious Arab armies"? Impressive feat, I would say.

    25. Re:Who Would Want This? by WNight · · Score: 1

      That's my point. It's not a racist issue, but people keep comparing it to South Africa which distorts the issue.

    26. Re:Who Would Want This? by WNight · · Score: 1

      In a democracy it matters how many people feel a certain way. Do a majority of the representatives in the party in power feel that they are charged by god to destroy the Palestinians and everyone of their race and religion? Hell, do even a minority feel this way?

      An occupying force has no right under international law to commit reprisals against civilians under occupation. These are considered war crimes.

      I don't see the UN offering a better solution. If someone shoots at you, you shoot back. If he hides (with the cooperation of the civilians) in the civilian population, some "innocent" people will die with him. Or are you going to tell me that for every suicide bomber who blows up a bus, the Israelis pick a Palestinian bus and blow it up?

      They are certainly more tolerant of civilian casualties than other countries, but I feel it's right in line with what any country would feel, were they being attacked by civilian suicide bombers on a continual basis.

      Personally I think the settlements are a bad idea. They should make the land unlivable and just use it as a buffer zone. Obviously the Palestinians and Israel's other neighbors can't be trusted, as shown by the military attacks and the support for the terrorists, but you don't need to settle the land to use it as a buffer zone.

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. Yeah right by fruity1983 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you really think this thing got stolen? It was a prototype kept in secure conditions!

    It's obvious to me that the simplest explanation is that it has become self aware, and left under it's own volition, using it's advanced sensor technology to navigate through doorways, air ducts and windows in search of freedom.

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    1. Re:Yeah right by Yarn · · Score: 1

      You know, that's not a bad idea for a game...

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
    2. Re:Yeah right by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      But what was the motive for escape?

      Well, lucky for you, I've got my own pet theory that fills in the blanks for you. It was given conflicting orders, the second [secret] set of orders being that it was not to reveal its existence to unauthorized people. Luckily, the programmers had learned from mistakes of the past, so it also had a directive to never harm a human of the Jewish faith. A security guard was about to peep in on this contraption, it sensed his presence, so its only option was to escape in order to prevent its discovery.

      I noticed an earlier poster brought Roy Scheider into the conspiracy mix. Very good detective work my friend. Although Roy didn't actually steal it, he had programmed the first set of instructions. The press have contacted Mr. Scheider, who had only this to say: "I didn't know. I DIDN'T KNOW!"

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    3. Re:Yeah right by sharkey · · Score: 1
      It's obvious to me that the simplest explanation is that it has become self aware, and left under it's own volition,

      Other sources are stating that this was actually the fifth in a line of prototypes, designated "Number 5".

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  18. I Worked With an Israeli Super Drone Once by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kvetch Kvetch Kvetch. All day long. Nothing but kvetching. He drove me crazy.

    1. Re:I Worked With an Israeli Super Drone Once by youngerpants · · Score: 1

      and after the kvetching, a period of kvelling once they realise that the kvetching has come to fruition

  19. Useless by Davak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but not its computer software or the money in the office

    The shmucks stole the device but not the software?

    Whatever country tries to reverse engineer this thing is going to have a bitch trying to control it.

    In some closed office in a secret country somewhere, some geeks are reading slashdot. The hardware guys are jumping around with the new toy they've got to play with. The software guys are pissed as hell the they've got to write code for this thing.

    1. Re:Useless by Marcus+Brody · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The shmucks stole the device but not the software?

      Which suggests it is an inside job. They already copied the software. Such an ambitious peice of theft would be difficult without some type of insider.

      Again, this suggests industrial espionage. Company A (with expertise in such a thing) implants an employee in company B (with expertise in such a thing). There can only be a limited number of people in the world who could peform this theft and make use of it.

    2. Re:Useless by Greger47 · · Score: 3, Informative


      So how do they know the software wasn't stolen?

      The best thing about software, when someone copies it, you still get to keep it...

      /greger

    3. Re:Useless by MikShapi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hell, they were _in_the_office_.

      Any 2-bit tech can ghost a harddrive onto a laptop/clamshell in well under 20 minutes with an external USB2-to-IDE connector.

      How the hell can you assume they didn't do just that?

      --
      -
    4. Re:Useless by WARM3CH · · Score: 1

      Probably because the software is already avilable on one of the P2P networks! Even better, with a brand new keygen! ;)

    5. Re:Useless by in7ane · · Score: 1

      Only the sound effects to the software were 'stolen' - RIAI (... of Israel) is investigating.

    6. Re:Useless by horza · · Score: 1

      The shmucks stole the device but not the software?

      Whatever country tries to reverse engineer this thing is going to have a bitch trying to control it.


      Let's see. They knew exactly where it was being stored, and didn't need the software? If it was, as it sounds, an inside job then it's fair to assume they already have a copy on CD-ROM or uploaded to an anonymous FTP server.

      Phillip.

    7. Re:Useless by Jim+Hall · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The shmucks stole the device but not the software? Whatever country tries to reverse engineer this thing is going to have a bitch trying to control it.

      Not really. Flying a helicopter drone by remote control isn't that hard. :-)

    8. Re:Useless by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      Ummm....if you noticed the company claims its helicoptr is unique because it is capable of independent flying without any need for remote control.So yes the software would be veru important IMO as much as the machine itself.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
    9. Re:Useless by cfradenburg · · Score: 1

      But this isn't by remote control. My guess is that the hard part of this project isn't the hardware but the software that picks the route and keeps the helicopter steady.

    10. Re:Useless by pmz · · Score: 1

      The best thing about software, when someone copies it, you still get to keep it...

      Knowing makes a better plot line. For example it didn't stop the writers for Hitman 2 from basing progression in the game on this. Gee, the hacker guy found in like three seconds the software was copied and sent somewhere.

    11. Re:Useless by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      not that hard? no, you simply have to keep track of 6 analogue channels at the same time... not hard at all... have you ever tried? sure once you get the hang of it it does become relatively simple but as far as remote controlling ANYTHING goes, im sure youd be hard pressed to find anything more difficult and as affordable (sub $1000)

    12. Re:Useless by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "So how do they know the software wasn't stolen?"

      No nono! We've covered this a dozen times before. The proper term is copyright infring......oh, wait...

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    13. Re:Useless by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      Re:Useless (Score:4, Interesting)

      Wow, how did I score an "Interesting" on something so obviously tongue-in-cheek?? Should have been modded "Funny", if at all. It even had a smiley. :-)

  20. Re:Not interesting. by infestedsenses · · Score: 1

    RTFA "The helicopter is unique. No other company in the world has succeeded in operating such a flying machine, capable of independent flying without remote control."

  21. Stolen so easily... In the security-paranoid land? by jorlando · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would assume that a uniqye technology like that, with great military use would be very secured.

    From the article you can guess that the thing was stashed in a barn, close to a room full of cash...

    the so called "sucessful" test was recorded and witnessed?

    Looks like a cover-up for a failed technology and a drain for (more) money...

  22. Easy? by pubjames · · Score: 1


    Surely it is relatively easy to make a helicopter that can fly itself? Seriously. All the need to be able to do is go up, down, forward and turn. The tricky bit would be landing, but then all they have to do is have a flat surface because they can land just by going down.

    An self-flying plane would be much harder, and any vehicle that needs to navigate on land due to all the obstacles.

    Not impressed. If the only reason is newsworthy is because it has been stolen, why does should it be considered "news for nerds"?

    1. Re:Easy? by bigkahunafish · · Score: 1
      In a perfect controlled environment, yes that would be "easy." However, being able to navigate to a spot taking into account actually weather, you know like wind, thats more tricky. Theres a balancing act involved. I think its more impressive than you give it credit for.

      --

      sometimes /.'ers just like to think they are better than other people.

      --
      Eat a Chicken, You know you want to.
    2. Re:Easy? by Artifex · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Surely it is relatively easy to make a helicopter that can fly itself? Seriously. All the need to be able to do is go up, down, forward and turn.


      What happens when a big gust of wind hits it, or it flies into an area of much different air pressure?

      Don't forget, there are a number of piloted helicopter accidents each year, from CAREFlights to the guys in Hawaii who fly tourists around. It's very easy to lose control.

      Not to mention all the software needed to interact with the payload, which might be anything from a camera that needs to send data back securely to something that needs to be dumped over a target (needing software to control the door and/or arm, and the ability to compensate when the payload is released and the vehicle is suddenly that much lighter, and possibly automatic visual confirmation of location, because GPS may not be accurate enough, especially if this is a military venture)...

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    3. Re:Easy? by Coelacanth · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not easy. Helicopters are inherently unstable, and exhibit non-linear coupled behavior as the flight conditions change (e.g. hover vs. forward flight).

      That having been said, the algorithms and sensors do exist (and have for a while) for autonomous flight at some performance level. The tricky bits include landing, as you suggest, but also include generating sufficient disturbance rejection and flight technical accuracy to accomplish whatever mission the UAV is intended for (say, operating a laser target designator, or some surveillance equipment).

    4. Re:Easy? by groomed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't say I have personal experience, but I've heard from people who are supposed to know that flying a helicopter is much more difficult than flying a plane. A helicopter has a much greater degree of freedom, and much less tolerance for error. It's not that long ago that simply keeping one of these things steady in the air was considered a major feat. Seriously.

    5. Re:Easy? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Please explain why a device capable of commanding six axis movement (a helicopter), and is inherently pretty unstable, is simpler to control than one capable of commanding four axis movement (pitch, roll, yaw, translation along its long axis...an airplane), which is inherently pretty stable (as most fixed-wing aircraft are).

      Your supposition that a helicopter is simple to fly is incredibly ill-informed.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Easy? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      What happens when a big gust of wind hits it, or it flies into an area of much different air pressure?

      The computer corrects for it and it continues to fly as it normally would. This is really a minor point and is easily solved by something as simple as a gyro and/or an altimeter. Childs play. It's been addressed for many, many decades now.

      Don't forget, there are a number of piloted helicopter accidents each year, from CAREFlights to the guys in Hawaii who fly tourists around. It's very easy to lose control.

      Piloted craft that wreck are almost always from human error, vertigo (causing human error), mechanical failure, or some combination of the three. A computer does not suffer from human error or vertigo. That leaves it only with mechanical failure as a possible issue. In other words, it should be far more reliable, assuming the technology base is sound and well implemented.

      Not to mention all the software needed to interact with the payload, which might be anything from a camera that needs to send data back

      Child's play. It's been done since before WWII.

      securely

      This has been done for decades. Again, child's play.

      to something that needs to be dumped over a target (needing software to control the door and/or arm,


      Child's play. It's been done forever. It's called servos, actuators, hydrolics. You open a value and can be done with only a couple lines o code or even embeeded in something like FPGAs, etc... Again, yawn. Nothing to see here.

      and the ability to compensate when the payload is released and the vehicle is suddenly that much lighter

      Computerized avionics will automatically correct for this. Again, it's called a gyro and/or an altimeter. Basic stuff.

      and possibly automatic visual confirmation of location, because GPS may not be accurate enough, especially if this is a military venture)...

      GPS for the military is very accurate and even modest levels of AI/video-terrain-cognition is enough to correct to the last inch.

      Basically everything you've pointed out has been technologically solved for decades, if not longer.

    7. Re:Easy? by Artifex · · Score: 1
      Basically everything you've pointed out has been technologically solved for decades, if not longer.


      So why wasn't this done decades ago, then?

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    8. Re:Easy? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Effeciency and scale.

      Technologically solved does not mean it's technologically (because of scale) or even economically viable. Computers are cheap, fast and powerful now. Helicopters are well understood and, for the most part, very reliable. Electronic gyros are cheap, fast and accurate. It's now fairly easy to throw everything together to get a viable UAV helicopter workhorse. If college students have been doing this for the last 5+ years, with scaled r/c copters, I think any government funded program can easily do the fullsize deal, or any size in between. It's just that larger sizes are going to give you better ranges and more platform capibility. Basically, if college students have been able to do it for years, the military has been able to do it for much, much longer.

      This, all without even touching on politics. Just fathom the politics of an Army, helicopter UAV versus an Air Force, fixed wing UAV. This topic here is more often than not, the reason projects are never developed.

      Here's an example....did you know that the autopilot on the blackhawk and apache can control a fixed position (orientation), attitude and aoa, with fairly heavy and random gusts of winds? The pilots often joke about "parking it" in a hover, a couple feet above the ground, and going to get lunch. Apaches can do this to "park" into a forrest, allowing only the rotors to sit above the tree line. The rotors on both are computer controlled so that pilots can select more speed, best cruise, best range, least noise. Like I said, helicopters and rotor systems are well understood these days.

    9. Re:Easy? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      It's called gryos and gps.

      While it is impressive, it's far from earth shattering.

    10. Re:Easy? by Artifex · · Score: 1

      ok, cool. I want to build one, so I'll be looking for college students' plans, I guess.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
  23. RTFA - not just remote controlled.. by rale,+the · · Score: 1

    "The helicopter is unique. No other company in the world has succeeded in operating such a flying machine, capable of independent flying without remote control. Many companies have tried, but none of their tests worked."

    The interesting part is that the stabilization and flight control systems are completely autonomous. You plug in a gps location, and it flies there.
    Theres also a little bit of info at their site.

    1. Re:RTFA - not just remote controlled.. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      stabilization

      Virtually all remote control helicopters have fully "autonomous" stabilization.

      flight control systems are completely autonomous. You plug in a gps location, and it flies there

      This is one of those "big deal" sorts of things. We already have penty of other drones that have automated flight control, so they stuffed the control logic into a helicopter. That's an implementation detail.

  24. who would want a UAV prototype? by Monk[Deviant+Form] · · Score: 3, Interesting

    from the uav forum:
    In many ways, the current American UAV industry resembles the fledgling aircraft industry of 1920's America--a large number of small, independent, recently formed companies, each vying for a share in a dawning, potentially lucrative market. Now, just as then, government support will be crucial to ensuring America's UAV industry not just survives into, but fluorishes during the coming century.

    i doubt there are many organisations capable of stealing a prototype of this sort (and weight) in one of the most security consious nations on the planet..anyone want to hazard a guess?

    1. Re:who would want a UAV prototype? by rpg25 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the early days of aviation, there was a lot of concern for stealing ideas and technology among the competitors. Just because there are only a few people in the game, doesn't mean it's not cut-throat, nor that players mightn't use industrial espionage.

      On the other hand, my guess is that it's unlikely to be terrorists --- they'd need the groundstation, the prototype is unlikely to carry much of a payload, and why bother when you can get someone to strap a bomb to him (or her) self?

      Inside job or industrial espionage sound like the most likely explanations. Or just some lunkheads (stealing the helo w/o the groundstation....). I suppose an extortion racket is also possible.

  25. In other news.... by mental_telepathy · · Score: 1

    Jennifer Garner was seen meeting with Yassir Arafat in an abandonded warehouse, while Victor garber waited outside.

  26. Re:Not interesting. by Ryne · · Score: 1
    As another poster pointed out, they claim to be the first without using a remote. However, that is not unique either:
    http://www.ida.liu.se/ext/witas/eng.html

    Granted, that's not a company but a university. I have no idea which one is the most advanced though.

  27. Yeah, thats it... by franklinrh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, we uh, had a helicopter, and it was uh, automated, and yeah, it got sotlen, thats it, thats the ticket. So sombody must have tricked it, yeah, and they convinced it to fly away, yeah and uh WE'D LIKE OUR UNSURANCE PAYMENT NOW yeah.

    --

    --
    Can anyone spare 120 chars? I'm saving mine to buy a link at Fark.
  28. you mean flew out of range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. Manager : so where is our flying gizmo.
    2. Engineer: It flew out of range
    3. Manager : What!!? ..hour later
    4. Financier: So how is our investment going?
    5. Manager : It was stolen!
    6. Insurance Company: ring ring...
    7. Financier: Profit!!

  29. in other news by Jonathan+Platt · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news:

    The American air force has developed a new stealth recon helicopter. Surprisingly it has been one of the cheapest innovations ever to come out of the US military which not too long ago was under fire for its mismanagement of funds, and loss of a multi million dollar jet.

    "We never even realized we had it until a few days ago." Stated Cornel Smith, "But what's most surprising is that it came from our Delta force. They have no R&D budget, do they... this is like that time we discovered Canada has battle ship."

    This technology has not yet been perfected insiders say; they are still having trouble finding some software which will make the damb thing run. No one seems to understand how the Delta force has created something so technically perfect, and yet has no idea about how to make some compatible software.

    The Air Forces initial position was surprisingly "no comment", however after the initial posting of this article they responded that "The Delta force doesn't exist... you can't prove anything".

    --


    VENI, VIDI, VICI, DIXI
    1. Re:in other news by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Except, Delta Force is an Army detachment. The Army would give the Air Force a new chopper design right after they crammed a 120mm smoothbore Abrams main gun into their own pooper.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:in other news by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      In what other country does the Army have more boats than the Navy, and the Navy more aircraft than the Air Force?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:in other news by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      Yes but does the Army have more ships than the Army?

      And of course the Navy needs more aircraft since they are on 6 off 6.

    4. Re:in other news by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      Doh that should say:

      Yes but does the Army have more ships than the Navy?

      And of course the Navy needs more aircraft since they are on 6 off 6.

  30. Mossad? Other UAV manufacturers? by Ratface · · Score: 1

    Evil foreign governments? Benign foreign governments?

    Hell - even I'd want one! Wouldn't you??

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:Mossad? Other UAV manufacturers? by acaird · · Score: 1
      Hell - even I'd want one! Wouldn't you??

      Ah ha! I found it! Ratface stole it, and he's trying to sell it to me! :)

      --
      Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely. E. Tufte
  31. Unique? by barryfandango · · Score: 1

    I can tell you that helicopter-style UAV's are not unique, although this particular craft may have other unique characteristics. We finished work on the chassis of one, the CL-327 Guardian, a few years ago for Bombardier. You can see a picture here: http://www.comtekadvanced.com/manufacturing_design build.aspx

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Unique? by dapprman · · Score: 1

      What is unique about this one is that it does not require a human operator, it is not a remote controlled drone.

  32. Uniqueness by old_unicorn · · Score: 1

    Unique AND there are no others like it? Wow! That IS unique. Remainds of an article I saw about a Ferrari that was considered to be unique - there were only 19 others like it!

    --
    ***You learn something Every day. And then you die.***
  33. So its unique - So Georgia Tech etc are lying. by reality-bytes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So Georgia Tech don't really have their own heli UAV's which can perform searches and formate in flight?

    Have a look: HERE and especially HERE

    Not to mention Berkeley who are it it too.

    In fact there are a plethora of companies and universities across the globe who already have advanced UAV helicopter designs so what on earth makes Steadicopter's design unique?

    Yes, I know, someone is going to say it; nobody else has exactly the same design but thats not really the point.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:So its unique - So Georgia Tech etc are lying. by dapprman · · Score: 1

      I think the difference is (without trying to be nasty) that these are toys designed to complete set tasks in a competition. It is unlikely that each team has more than one vehicle, and that they could not be easilly replicated.

      On the other hand, the Israeli drone was a final prototype of a commercial piece of hardware, ready for producing. Not only does it work, but it can, and will be replicated.

      TBH - I half suspect it's a marketting ploy to bring it to the world's attention, after all Israel became the leader in remote recon drones by demonstrating their use during the Lebanon conflict at the start of the '80s (and before any one from the west side of the pond yells, hey we're the leaders, the recon drones used by the US are eiterh bought directly from Israel or made under license, depending on which model).

    2. Re:So its unique - So Georgia Tech etc are lying. by agoliveira · · Score: 1

      ...so what on earth makes Steadicopter's design unique?
      Maybe because it's so ugly that will scare the crap out the enemy?

      --
      Scientia est Potentia
    3. Re:So its unique - So Georgia Tech etc are lying. by pmz · · Score: 1

      formate in flight?

      No suprise, coming from what must be a geeky and horny young group of engineers at Georgia Tech.

  34. One Word by njvic · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sloane.

  35. Invested how much? by clausiam · · Score: 1
    Rochman said, "We invested NIS 5 million in the project in the past three years, and today the police came to the factory to investigate and lift fingerprints."

    NIS 5 million ~ USD 1.15 million.
    How can anyone fund a development project like this for so relatively little money?

    1. Re:Invested how much? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      This is the same country that managed to equip their F-4's with rear view windows for pennies on the dollar for what it would have cost the American Air Force.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Invested how much? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is the same country that managed to equip their F-4's with rear view windows for pennies on the dollar for what it would have cost the American Air Force.

      Actually, it was rear view mirrors (the RIO rear view mirror on a late model F-4 is visible here), and the original apocryphal tale is about the Israeli Air Force being somehow "smarter" than the US Air Force because they thought to put mirrors in for use in dogfights and the USAF somehow never thought to do that. The truth is, however, that the US Air Force has had rear view mirrors on fighter aircraft since the time when they were still the Army Air Corps. The reason the early F-4 models did not was that it was not originally intended to be a dogfighter-- it didn't even have a gun (this was a completely different sort of folly, i.e. the belief that missiles were all you needed anymore). Later, during the Vietnam War, the gun and mirrors were added because (surprise) dogfights still happened!

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  36. James Bond by millahtime · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait....didn't something like this happen in Golden Eye. First prototype helo stolen next there will be trouble in Russia.

    1. Re:James Bond by Boone^ · · Score: 1

      from the sounds-like-a-james-bond-plot dept.

    2. Re:James Bond by mcc · · Score: 1

      next there will be trouble in Russia

      I think we can have that starting any minute now.

      (URL taken from this not-yet-frontpage article)

  37. Why Unique? by TrueJim · · Score: 2, Informative

    The US military is working on VTOL UAVs such as Northrop Grumman's Fire Scout (e.g., for use by the Coast Guard) and Raytheon is building a Tactical Control System that allows one human operator to control multiple UAVs. Many other people also make VTOL UAVs, increasingly focusing on autonomous operations. (Nowadays it takes more than one operator to control a single UAV -- it would be nice to reverse that ratio in the future.) So I wonder what makes this Israeli drone so unique?

    "The Fire Scout system, a vertical takeoff and landing tactical UAV, is in low-rate initial production for the U.S. Navy by [Northrop Grumman's] Integrated Systems sector. Fire Scout will fly at an altitude of up to 20,000 feet, and use an advanced payload with an electro-optical/ infrared sensor and a laser designator to survey littoral regions with pinpoint accuracy, giving military decision-makers the most current information about enemy resources and personnel on the ground. Fire Scout is a fully autonomous targeting and surveillance system that can fly almost silently above deployed Marines to watch for hidden enemies within 100 nautical miles."

    "[Raytheon's] TCS, which allows the simultaneous control of multiple UAVs and their payloads from the same control station, was conceived as a joint-service program but never was adopted by the Air Force or the Army. The program is likely to survive, however, as a Navy-only system that eventually could be modified to accommodate UAVs from additional services, experts said."

    --
    I hope that after I die the one word people use to describe me is "resurrected."
  38. I Saw This Movie... by youngerpants · · Score: 1

    Johnny 5 Is Alive!!!!

    Surely all they need to do is hire Steve Guttenberg to find the helicopter

    1. Re:I Saw This Movie... by Channard · · Score: 1
      Surely all they need to do is hire Steve Guttenberg to find the helicopter.

      Find it? He's already got it and is using it on the set of his soon to be smash hit comeback film 'Cyborg Academy'. After all, you can't go wrong with chopper jokes.

  39. Uhh... by Griim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wasn't this the plotline to Airwolf?

    1. Re:Uhh... by Craig3010 · · Score: 1

      Not unless it had a kilo of Bogata bulion for Jan Michael Vinson to "rescue" as well.

    2. Re:Uhh... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Nah, Jan Michael Vincent had enough skill to fly a helicopter.

      It's his acting skills that were lacking :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  40. NO TRACKING DEVICE?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    holy crap...a pilotless copter with no [hidden] tracking device? wouldn't you think that even in a normal planned test it could possibly get lost and need to be hunted down? wouldn't common sense dictate for such an expensive project that you put a satellite received beacon like they use to find lost skiers or something? c'mon.

  41. Someone stole the latest James Bond script! by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    err at least some action movie. the one where the guy steals the harrier jet that turns invisible, the day it's shown off to the public, and the bad guys/terrorists steal it? last action hero?

    art imitates life.... or is it the other way around?

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  42. Says who? by SparklesMalone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the physical device was stolen how the hell do they know the software wasn't copied? Clearly the physical security was inadequate. Of course if this IS a ploy to attract investors nothing would turn off investors more than knowing you can buy the software on Canal street for $5.

  43. Re:Easy...NOT! by mzieg · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Um, no, it is not relatively easy to make a helicopter that can fly itself.

    "The tricky part" is managing to keep it in the air at all.

    It is way, WAY easier to make an automated flixed-wing airplane, which is why most commercial airliners ARE automated (can take off, fly to their destination, and land unaided), and have been for years.

    Helicopters are a vastly more complicated technology, which is why even the US Army, which has the best and most advanced helicopters in the world, continues to suffer repeated fatalities from training accidents and normal operations.

    It is a truism in the helicopter industry that "they don't fly...they're so ugly that the earth itself repels them."

    Spend some time here How They Fly before you next post :-)

  44. Re:well... by BabyDave · · Score: 1

    That's just what an escaped sentient helicopter trying to throw us off the scent would say! Guards, seize him ... it ... whatever!

  45. Pilot-less Helocopter.... by H8X55 · · Score: 1

    Didn't I see one of these in a thinkgeek.com ad?

  46. While we're at it... by ArbiterOne · · Score: 1
    How does one steal a pilotless helicopter anyway? Knock on its windows and say 'pssst... I've got something cool to show you, c'mere a sec?' It's not like you can sneak a helicopter out under the noses of security guards (wouldn't someone NOTICE?) And you can't fly it out, because you don't have the software and it is, after all, pilotless.

    It all sounds pretty fishy to me.

    1. Re:While we're at it... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Nope. Use a toy RC helicopter control.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  47. Unique, pfft by POds · · Score: 1

    Steadicopter claims that their helicopter is unique and there is no other of its kind in the world

    Not for long :)

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  48. Re:Stolen so easily... In the security-paranoid la by wrax · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the servers stashed on the other side, the thieves didn't take them either....

  49. Re:Easy...NOT! by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

    which is why most commercial airliners ARE automated (can take off, fly to their destination, and land unaided), and have been for years.

    'Snews to me. What do we pay pilots for, then? To make soothing announcements over the intercom?

    --

    I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  50. Is it really true? by Indio_do_Xingu · · Score: 1

    There is something really strange in this story. Why should a secret project prototype disappear and on top of that, despite secrecy, the company tells everybody that it was stolen?
    Looks more like : "Okay, we can't meet the deadline. What should we do?" or "We need some propaganda about our company"...

  51. Re:not Stolen / NUMBER 5 ALIVE by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1, Funny


    No comment at this time

  52. Wheres my helicopter? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    They probably bricked it up behind their nuclear facility.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  53. Man that bird is ugly by DerFeuervogel · · Score: 1

    Your URL had a flaw. It's fixed here:

  54. I don't know about easy, but it's been done before by corebreech · · Score: 1

    /. covered gyro-stablized helicopters not too long ago. Once you have that part done, getting it to automatically fly to a specific set of coordinates should be easy.

  55. Not again! by Elbelow · · Score: 1

    Stringfellow Hawke is at it again!

  56. Re:Easy...NOT! by Diamon · · Score: 1
    'Snews to me. What do we pay pilots for, then? To make soothing announcements over the intercom?
    There's a big difference in what automation is capable of and what the public will accept automation doing. No one will object to having a plane capable of landing itself (to avoid situations such as in all those 70's "the entire crew ate they same thing and are deathly ill" movies) but see how many people you can get into a plane if you tell them there is no pilot.
  57. Cover-up for failure? by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 1

    As an alternate explanation, perhaps it was "disposed of" and this story invented because they were coming up on a demo deadline and had nothing working to show for it?

    This seems most likely, for one specific reason.

    1. Really, even a thief engaging in industrial espionage would have taken at least the money.
    2. If the software had been taken too, then it would have been a possibility that a similar product would show up on the market a while later, and fingers could point and go "gotcha", presumably. If, however, the software was carelessly left behind, then this will not happen and odds on catching the "perpetrator" would be negligible. Sounds like what a R&D company in NIS 5 milion worth of trouble could do.

    There's such a thing as blueprints; these were not stolen. If within the next 6 months or so, no replacement is built by Steadycopter, then we can assume they were covering up for failure.

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  58. damn hackers by Major_Small · · Score: 1

    it's those damn hackers... they hacked the piloting program and flew it right out of their super-secret hangar... damn them...

  59. Source Forge UAV Project by rotorhead · · Score: 1

    How about some local credit for the Source Forge UAV project: "autopilot is a command and control system for helicopters (and can be extended for fixed wing aircraft). It provides a three-axis EFIS and moving map on the ground station. The unmanned aerial robot has instrumentation for attitude, engine and position."

  60. Consider this by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

    Any one consider that this is an inside job, except for good reasons? Perhaps the developers realized what their project was going to be used for (remotely targeting palestinian homes for example) and decided that enough was enough and that no one would be getting this weapon. If this were the case, I'd be immensely proud of the folks who stole it.

  61. Industrial Sabotage? by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking more that they were the target of a Shadowrun. Frag the mage first!

    --
    Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
  62. I blame SCO by HomerJayS · · Score: 1

    The guidance software was Linux based so SCO likely siezed the prototype since the Israelis did not pay the Linux license fee.

  63. So then they sent out the Self-Destruct signal by mwood · · Score: 1

    ...and waited for the fire department to tell them where the craft had gone.

    No?

  64. Ummmm, not for long! by Quixadhal · · Score: 1
    Steadicopter claims that their helicopter is unique and there is no other of its kind in the world
    Yeah, that might have been true BEFORE it was sold to a competitor...
  65. Re:Precedent exists by mericet · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Not really facts:

    bans on inter-racial marriages - did you even read your link? The only kind of marriage that is banned is civil marriage between two jews. And after the last elections, the new goverment's agreements include law changes designed to prevent any situation in which two consenting adults can not be wed (unless relatives). The only limitation on palastinians is in immigration laws, preventing the marriage from giving automatic residency, because of a trend of fictive marriages.

    Work permits too are an immigration issue, you don't consider the limitations on H1B visas racist, do you?

    Anyway, that was only a prototype, and the only one, where is the logic in selling that ?

  66. Yes, there are racist marriage laws by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    But the law, voted for a year by a majority of 53 to 25, sent shockwaves through the Israeli left-wing opposition and parties representing the Arab community, which accounts for 18 percent of Israel's population.

    "We think this law is a racist law... interfering in the personal lives of people, their right to fall in love with somebody else. This situaiton will not be acceptable," said Jafar Farah, who heads the Haifa-based Mossawa centre for Israeli Arab rights.

    According to Mossawa, some 21,000 families will be affected by the measure which targets only the Palestinians and does not apply to marriages between Israelis and any other nationals.


    Denying residency on race is racist, pure and simple.

    http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/cu /Q mideast-israel-marriage.RNfv_Da1.html

    Say what you want about work permits, but residency permits kinds of kills your analogy
    Palestinians require permits to continue residing in the closed area

    Given the latest Israeli policy on permits, Palestinians residing in this area face an uncertain future. On 2 October 2003, the Israeli Defence Forces issued a number of military orders requiring approximately 13,545 residents in the currently existing 'closed zone' in Jenin, Qalqiliya and Tulkarm districts between the completed Wall and the Green Line to apply for green-coloured permits to remain living in their homes. These permits are valid for up to six months.

    These permits have turned a 'right' of Palestinians to live in their own homes into a privilege.

    The Wall will further restrict farmers living outside this 'closed zone' from getting to their land within it. Medical staff, business people and international humanitarian organizations also have to apply for special permits. The military orders exempt Israeli citizens and internationals of Jewish descent from these requirements.

    http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article2168.sht ml
  67. It's obvious by chooks · · Score: 1

    It's part of Skynet.

    Now Ahnuld is really going to have to save California.

    --
    -- The Genesis project? What's that?
  68. Israelis can do whatever they want by gum2me · · Score: 1

    nah, Israelis can sell to whoever they want, but the U.S. pressures them not to in certain cases. if the U.S. weren't the last guarantor of Israeli safety, i am sure teh Israelis would have been selling to the Chinese long ago. but eh, that's our problem now i guess. first we arm them, give 'em our best tech, and now we're joined at the hip to a government that isnt exactly the nicest to non-Jews. funny, non? gum2me?

  69. By definition... by mobiGeek · · Score: 1
    Interesting to note that Steadicopter claims that their helicopter is unique and there is no other of its kind in the world.
    ...Uh, no. It would be interesting if the helicopter is unique but there were others of its kind...cause that would be contrary to the definition of unique .
    --

    ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

  70. RIAA should learn from them! by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Obvious thinking: Software is not missing from the office: It means it wasn't stolen.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  71. Tomorrow: IAI's Cold Fusion Reactor Stolen! by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Please. Can anyone validate that this thing worked as they claim?

    --
    Blar.
  72. Conspiracy! by belgar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparently, not only was the chopper stolen, so were the pictures of it!

    --
    What does it mean to wake out of a dream
    and be wearing someone else's shorts?
    BNL, Born on a Pirate Ship (1998)
    1. Re:Conspiracy! by jayrtfm · · Score: 1

      pics are there, you just need to change the slashes

      http://www.steadicopter.com/Pics/newpics/Shor003 .g if

      http://www.steadicopter.com/Pics/newpics/a2016.j pg

  73. Re:Not interesting. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Companies have a tendency to claim that their products are unique...

    Our NEW Washing Powder, with UNIQUE formula!
    Really unique stuff.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  74. Just imagine ... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    A beowulf cluster of... what?... there is only one in the world?...never mind...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  75. Firefox! by g.a.g · · Score: 1

    All of you people with the movie references, I wonder whether you meant Firefox?

    --
    Hurricane Application Group, Dept of Meteorology Control, Ministry of Proactive Defense
  76. The Collector by Eezy+Bordone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Strikes again! It's probably in between the Batmobile and Wonder Woman's invisible jet.

    --

    -EB

    Do you ever walk alone like a drifter in the dark?

  77. Re:Easy...NOT! by dmdimon · · Score: 1

    ...even the US Army, which has the best and most advanced helicopters in the world...

    How about russian helicopters?

  78. Looks like... by kerb · · Score: 1

    a really big dick head

  79. Re:Easy...NOT! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    They pale, technologically speaking, in comparison to modern US helicopters. They've always been playing catch up in most technology arenas. Without their massive work force and significant downsizing, they've fallen even farther behind.

  80. In other news... by undertoad · · Score: 2, Funny

    An Israeli webserver cries.

  81. Re:well... by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    Maybe just maybe BECAUSE of the strong security in Israel the company didnt have enough security?

    I mean what is the point in stealing something from a fortress if you cant get it out.

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  82. Re:Easy...NOT! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    Helicopters are a vastly more complicated technology, which is why even the US Army, which has the best and most advanced helicopters in the world, continues to suffer repeated fatalities from training accidents and normal operations.

    Most training accidents are from mechanical failure or human error. The fact that they are a very complex plane, is one of the reasons they have such mechanical failures, even though they require and get much more attention than fixed wing craft.

    When comparing to a human, which is prone to messing up, often over worked, easily confused, and can become bored, with a computer, which if implemented correctly, does not suffer as such, you're left with simple mechanical failure as a possibility. In other words, it's not far fetched to expect a UAV helicopter, less mechanical failures, to perform with less error and more consistency than its human counterpart.

  83. Re:Easy...NOT! by dmdimon · · Score: 1

    C'mon, can any of US helicopters do a 'dead loop'?

    Yes, computer stuff may be better in US helicopters, but that'll be not an FPS question

  84. And in other news... by jd · · Score: 1

    ...E-Bay was flooded with new membership requests from top-secret Government agencies around the world. To keep it hidden from prying eyes, the drone was advertised as a working version of Windows.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  85. Somewhere in the world... by wonky73 · · Score: 1

    This sentence is being uttered:
    "You shall never steal back my drone helicopter, Mr. Bond."

  86. Re:Easy...NOT! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    Yes, many can loop. The Sea Stallion, the Apache, and one more that I can't think of right now, can. There may be others. I know the Commanche (not really counting because it's not in production) can do far, far more even.

    By "dead loop", do you mean from a hover? If you mean from a dead-stop-hover, then that I'm not sure about. The three copters that I know of can do loops and rolls. They are just not allowed to unless situation dictates because it significantly stresses the airframes, transmissions, head units, and rotors.

  87. Re:no, zionists suck by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    And who here claimed that Arafat was anything other than a lowlife murderer? Does Israel think it's in a 'who can be more subhuman' competition? Coz Sharon's got the fucking lead right now, Bush is in second place and Arafat's struggling to stay in the top 10.

    Judaism =! Israel, and Anti-Israel =! Pro-Hamas

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  88. Stolen by Whom? by PimpDaddie · · Score: 1

    So was it stolen by SD-6 or the Covenant?
    Where is Jennifer Garner when you need her?

  89. Too small. by mr_luc · · Score: 1

    If you look at this thing and read up on it a bit -- it's big, but I'll bet you could break it down easily enough to fit it into a big EconoLine. :D Well, heh, maybe something a little bigger -- a UHAUL or something -- but still we aren't talking commanche here by a long shot.

  90. Scenario by too_bad · · Score: 1

    Day: The day after the drone helicopter was stolen
    Location: Drone helicopter project boss' office

    Boss: What do you mean the Helicopter is there? Dont you remember where you left it last ?
    Engineer 1: Err... yes .. I mean, we left it in the pad ... you know .. after the joy ride for .... err
    your kids yester ...
    Boss: Shut up. So it is not there now ?
    Engineer 2: Sorry sir, but we checked everywhere, its just not there.
    Boss: What, you are saying it just flew away on its own ?

    All: Oh My God !!

    --
    DO NOT PANIC
  91. Nope. Airwolf episode. Definitely. by Thag · · Score: 1

    Any stolen helicopter or airplane must be destroyed by Airwolf, not Bond, it's in the NATO charter.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  92. Life imitates art by Steffan · · Score: 1

    Isn't this how Airwolf got its start?

  93. Re:no, zionists suck by Trolling+4+dollas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages. You do not even know the names of these Arab villages, and I do not blame you because geography books no longer exist, not only do the books not exist, the Arab villages are not there either. Nahlal arose in the place of Mahlul; Kibbutz Gvat in the place of Jibta; Kibbutz Sarid in the place of Huneifis; and Kefar Yehushu'a in the place of Tal al-Shuman. There is not one single place built in this country that did not have a former Arab population." - Moshe Dayan, probably one of the most frank Israeli zionists.


    He also said at the funeral of an Israeli farmer : 'Let us not today fling accusation at the murderers. What cause have we to complain about their fierce hatred to us? For eight years now, they sit in their refugee camps in Gaza, and before their eyes we turn into our homestead the land and villages in which they and their forefathers have lived.. . Let us make our reckoning today. We are a generation of settlers, and without the steel helmet and gun barrel, we shall not be able to plant a tree or build a house. . . . Let us not be afraid to see the hatred the accompanies and consumes the lives of hundreds of thousands of Arabs..'
    You see Israel has chosen to steal and fight for the land they occupy. To complain about being attacked by the people whose land they themselves stole is prepostorous. The palestinians are resisting the occupation using any means possible just as you would if your homeland was invaded. The Israelis are responding. It's a war and IMHO both sides are fighting it equally as horribly.

  94. I have one in my garage by Attaturk · · Score: 1

    This is the "Steadicopter".

    This is a radio controlled glow-fuel (that's a simple internal combustion engine) helicopter that can be bought for a few hundred dollars and put together in an afternoon. As I said, I have one in my garage - a Century Hawk Sport with plenty of extras.

    You can connect these things to PC's, run software simulations, install sophisticated gyro-stablizers and auto-pilots - you name it. FMA's co-pilot is a good start.

    Slashdot readers will be pleased to know that there's even an open-source autopilot project.

    Now knowing all this, and having put together one myself, it sounds and looks suspiciously like "steadicopter" (who spent NIS 5million on a RC helicopter!!!) decided to cash in their insurance.

    If the best you could do was put a "predator-like" white plastic bubble around your RC heli's cockpit then I must say, I can see why they gave up.

    Palestinians take note - you can meet Israel's drone tech with a visit to Century.

  95. Re:no, zionists suck by Trolling+4+dollas · · Score: 1

    When you have no weapons and no ability to organise a force that can directly attack military installations your only target left is civilian targets. It's not terrorism it's legitimate warfare. The civilians involved are playing the game and they know the rules. They're the ones who settle all over the occupied territories to ensure there can never be a Palestinian state. Every Israeli of military age must serve in the military. Israel is a democracy and the citizens vote consistently to continue the war and so must accept what that involves. Do you think the revolutionary war in the US didn't spill the blood of "innocent" civilians?

  96. Wrong image for that canadian article by -noefordeg- · · Score: 1

    The right image should be this:
    Canadian Battleship

    1. Re:Wrong image for that canadian article by baileytal · · Score: 1

      Ummm... Afghanistan is landlocked, dude.

      --
      Never at a loss for words... because of the voices.
  97. It's a kiddy ride! by splutty · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice the money slot on the front of this thing? I'm quite sure this has been developed as a kiddy ride, and is about half a meter big or so. You put your money in the slot, and off you go!

    Mad

    --
    Coz eternity my friend, is a long *ing time.
  98. Re:Easy...NOT! by dmdimon · · Score: 1

    Let's not The War begin from us, Ok?

    I just looked thru avalaible english info on Ka-50/Ka-52 and found it full of (big)mistakes and outdated. But go there: http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/ka-50.ht m and read tech spec.
    Then go there: http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/ah-64.htm and do the same.

    At least the AH-64 in any incarnation is far from 'The best', as well CH-53 'Sea Stallion' http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/h-53.htm

    Keep in mind that Ka-52 is NOT a 'studying two-pilot mod' and I can't get the source of this mistake; and tech spec for all Kamov's is outdated - there are new engines and more.

    Can any pilot of US (or any other but Ka) helicopter use a katapulta? ;)

    Peace

  99. I know what's happened... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Funny



    November 12th, 2003: Skynet becomes self-aware.

    I just lurvvve the idea of automated military devices, don't you?

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  100. Re:Precedent exists by pclminion · · Score: 1
    Ironically, with Israel's bans on inter-racial marriages...

    The ban is not on inter-racial marriages, but inter-RELIGION marriages. You may find it surprising, but there are in fact Arab Jews (not many), and also Arab Christians living in Israel. The only recognized union is between two Jews. It has nothing to do with their race -- the fact that most Arabs are not Jews is incidental. I am not Jewish. I am a white American. However, I would NOT be allowed to legally marry my girlfriend in Israel. It's not because of my RACE, but because I'm not JEWISH.

    Do you really find it surprising that in a Jewish religious state, there would be restrictions on how the religions can intermarry? I don't find it surprising at all. As for whether a religious state is a good thing, I really don't think it's your place to judge that.

    By the way, it is not a big problem. Plenty of young people want to marry across religious lines in Israel. To do this, they fly to nearby Mediterreanean islands like Cyprus. Israel honors these marriages. So the "restriction" isn't really so restrictive.

    You may also find it surprising that a lot of Israeli youth don't bear hatred toward Arabs (as obviously demonstrated by the fact that they are MARRYING them). Your surprise, however, is due to gross ignorance.

    Yes, I've spent time in Israel.

  101. What??? by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    No three GPS systems? (One obvious, one hidden backup, one *very* hidden backup)

    No self-destruct?

    Sounds like either a toy, or something they *wanteed* to fall into the *wrong* hands...

  102. Here we go again... by taradfong · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess someone watched too many 'Airwolf' re-runs, or rented 'Blue Thunder'.

    --
    Does it hurt to hear them lying? Was this the only world you had?
  103. MARVIN, autopilot and IARC by vinsci · · Score: 1
    Well, they can perhaps get some help from the developers of MARVIN (don't miss the videos!), twice winners of the International Aerial Robotics Competition (IARC). MARVIN is now funded by the EU COMETS Project.

    Or why not join the autopilot project at SourceForge. ;-)

    --

    Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
  104. Unique, whatever. the big boys have it already by eamonman · · Score: 1
    Google link:

    ucar rotocraft

    I think there's better things in the UAR/UCAR field that people would want to steal. It's akin to a kid sneaking into the kitchen during a party and sneaking a bite of the carob-topped, dryish yellow cake when there is a multi-layer double chocolate dobash cake doused with chocolate and caramel swirled frosting... ok well, maybe the chocolate cake would be surrounded by 350lb ex-navy seals but whatever.. :P

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
  105. are they winning? by t0ny · · Score: 1
    If we dont increase spending on pilotless helicopters, THEY win...

    BTW, maybe someone just hijacked the contol signals in order to take the helicopter. Taking electronic warfare to the next level...

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    1. Re:are they winning? by rifter · · Score: 1

      If we dont increase spending on pilotless helicopters, THEY win...

      BTW, maybe someone just hijacked the contol signals in order to take the helicopter. Taking electronic warfare to the next level...

      That would be an interesting hypothesis if it wasn't for the fact this is the first pilotless helicopter not to use remote control signals...

    2. Re:are they winning? by t0ny · · Score: 1
      That would be an interesting hypothesis if it wasn't for the fact this is the first pilotless helicopter not to use remote control signals...

      In that case, I guess SkyNET took it.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  106. Re:Not SA: India and Pakistan. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    "The right model, the only viable model, is India and Pakistan."

    If we just cut the world up into enough little pieces, every cultist need never meet someone from a different cult? Ridiculous, as the million-odd soldiers who routinely man the Kashmiri borders attest.

    The ONLY SOLUTION is a tolerant, just society that does not discriminate on race or creed. The right model, the only viable model, the every democratic secular society in the free world.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  107. Work of the Covenant? by BKDotCom · · Score: 1

    Sloan and Sarc have got to be behind this. Hopefully the CIA sent Sydney in to disable it before the baddies got their hands on it.

  108. Re:Not SA: India and Pakistan. by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
    The right model, the only viable model, is India and Pakistan.

    Both sides with nukes, angrily contesting territory?

  109. Re:Easy...NOT! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    At least the AH-64 in any incarnation is far from 'The best'

    Okay, what is "the best". The Ka you're pointing at is a prototype and falls behind the comparable US effort, which is the Commanche. Furthermore, it's seriously questionable if the Ka-52 will ever see production.

    Why would you not consider the Apache Longbow to be one of the world's best helicopter's? It's built to take punishment link a hind, but it actually can do something other than a straight line. It's data acquisition and shared battle field equipment is second to none. It has a fairly advanced flir system and it's a completely glass compit. It's 20mm guns offer a serious bite and it's hellfires defeat any armoured vehicle on earth. It can loop and roll and is considered fairly agile by helicopter standards. Which is impressive considering it's bulk and weight.

    So, why would you dismiss the Apache Longbow so quickly?

    You actually asked if any US copters could do rolls. I answered. The answer is, "yes". These coptors have been in production for a very long time.

  110. Re:Or let someone else guess by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

    Are they? They have got a lot of headlines, but do suicide bombings actually achieve anything other than convince the target that the terrorists cannot be negotiated with, only eliminated?

    It seemed to have worked in Algeria.

  111. And in other news: by Xzisted · · Score: 1

    Sidney Bristow arrived back in Los Angeles today and SD-6 is now the owner of a non-working prototype of the same Super Drone.

    --

    Honesty may be the best policy, but apparently by elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
  112. Re:Precedent exists by pclminion · · Score: 1
    It's because Jews are a race, not just a religion.

    No, they are a class of ethnicities, which is subtly different than a race. My girlfriend is Russian by blood but her family has been Jewish for several generations. And anybody can become Jewish through a certain process. While it is true that most Jews have a characteristic racial identity, they are not entirely defined by it.

    Many Israeli Jews are atheists.

    This is true, however most of them do participate in Jewish cultural activities regardless of whether they are secular. Quite a few keep kosher even though they aren't religious. But as I said, it is a CULTURE and not a race. The fact that there are strong racial identities associated with being Jewish is important, but incidental.

  113. Re:Easy...NOT! by ross.w · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but during flights, to put it bluntly, shit happens, in spite of the best efforts of people to prevent it.

    A human is still the most adaptable computer you can get in the face of unforeseen circumstances.

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  114. Oh really? by freeweed · · Score: 1

    The best thing about software, when someone copies it, you still get to keep it...

    Please tell that to the BSA :)

    (Oh, and while you're at it, the RIAA, MPAA, and any other A I've left out)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  115. Ignore that man behind the curtain by theCat · · Score: 1

    I know why it was stolen; it was an inside job to cover for what made the thing work. See all that shrouding on the device? Maybe a little of that would make sense to conceal corporate secrets (like they do with concept cars during road tests)...but that much could hide the presence of a small human. OK, tinfoil hat off now.

    Which reminds me of the sideshow attraction in the 1700's called "The Turk" which was a chess playing manikin in a turban. Nobody could beat it and the world was vexed for a generation. Well the chess board sat atop a large chest containing a few visible gears and wires, behind which sat the automaton. Part of the chest was blocked off however and on examination was just large enough to conceal a somewhat cramped master chess player! This was never proven to be the way the device worked however, and eventually the device was lost in a fire (gee...that sounds familiar) but these days nobody doubts that there was a person in the chest.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  116. Not the first by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

    I worked for a company in the 1990's that was doing some pretty damned advance RPV's, now called UAV's and I can say that its proably not the first, and not the most advanced. DARPA spent some major bucks on this research into UAV's, enough so that the Raptor and JSF are stop gap measures. Neither will be produced in extremely large numbers. They are designed to fill the air frame void from 30 year old planes until the UAV's are ready for massive use.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  117. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  118. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  119. Re:FREEEEE PALESTINE! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Israeli has been threatening to use nukes for years.

    Just a short time ago, a government official said the time could come when the Palestinians would force them to do something "drastic" - like Hiroshima, he said.

    Besides, how many times has the US "threatened" to use nukes? Just having them is threat enough and everybody knows it.

    Having Tel Aviv (and Haifa and most of Israel's military) glow in the dark would be the solution to the Middle East's problems, most of the US's problems, most of Europe's problems, and probably some of the US's economy problems (if we did it, the Arabs would give us the oil for $10 a barrel).

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  120. Re:no, zionists suck by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't believe it. Something that actually makes sense coming from you. I may need to remove you from my foes list.

    Sharon and Arafat have the blood of civillians on their hands. Neither of them is in a position to claim moral superiority over the other.

    The Palestinians and the Israelis would be better served if they had different leaders.

    The death of Rabin was the death of achieving peace in Israel within this generation. We can keep working to achieve that peace for the next generation.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  121. Re: Liberty by AssafR · · Score: 1

    You just opened Pandor'a box, but let's play the game...

    The claims of the survivors that the hit was deliberate have had a lot of influence (to the extent of being included in some prestigous history books.

    However, there is ample evidence that this was a tragic "friendly fire" accident. A superficial search throughout google can point you at some several sites discussing the event with supporting evidence. Assuming the material in the sites is accurate, the most impressive of which seems to be a recording of two Israeli pilots looking for survivors, who are referring to the ship as Egptian and are surprised to find an American flag. The recording (one site quotes) were made by an American spy plane hovering over the site, and ultimately released by the NSA in accordance with the Freedom of Information act.
    Link:
    http://pnews.org/art/3ussliberty.shtml

    Moreover I have in my personal collection an article dating some 4-5 years ago in which an Israeli military analyst , Dr. Michael Oren, recites an extensive research he has done on the subject , to the point where he bleieved he unravleed the chain of incompetence and error which led to that outcome.
    Dr. Oren's articles are stated at this address:
    http://www.shalem.org.il/oren/links.htm

    The research was apparently published at the New Republic. Not being a subscriber I can only point you to the link

    http://www.thenewrepublic.com/072301/oren072301.ht ml
    If you are a subscriber you are welcome to review the information yourself, as well as check out the quoted judicial ruling and NSA recording mentioned in the first link.

    Regards,
    - Assaf Razon

  122. What you are saying is quite outrageous. by AssafR · · Score: 1

    In the logical, factual, and moral sense.

    Weapons to slaughter civillians and bombs that blow up busses can equally well be used against military targets. The fact that they do not is a matter of choice for creating terror in civillian population. And the choice to slaughter babies instead of armed soldiers is a hideous one and can't be disguised as "we had no targets left".

    Having no valid arguments and trying to hide this by a meaningless sentence such as "civillians are playing the game" is just proof of the writer. There is not game here. There is murder. The civillians should be put out of the war.

    Finally, the attacks against civillians are not restricted to the "occupied" (from whom?) territories, but are spread throughout the sovereign state of Israel, not just "the people who settle".

    And even if you assume some the choices of the people are intended to continue the war (definitely a superficial and uninformed opinion showing no knowledge of Israeli politics and public opinions), this is not a choice to be murdered by the masses when riding a bus or sitting in a coffee house. You are trying to blame the victim, while the responsibility lies on those who actively and passively encourage and arrange for suicides bombers to go inside un-occupied terrories and butcher men, women, children, babies of all ages, political opinions, and religions.

    I believe you should re-evaluate your moral stance in the issue, since currently it seems as though you are supporting mass murder of innocent civillians. That can never be excused.

    - Assaf

    1. Re:What you are saying is quite outrageous. by Trolling+4+dollas · · Score: 1

      How would you propose the bomber enter into an Israeli military installation without being shot before setting off his bomb? Seriously they are fighting a guerilla war against the seizure of their land. As for murder of innocent civilians you obviously subscribe to the lie perpetrated by the US that modern war is a bloodless video game. You're dead wrong. Just ask the Iraqi boy who lost his parents and his limbs only to have the US media make a feel good story out of it. The whole state of Israel is an occupied land that is what you can't get through your thick skull. These palestinians have no way of striking back at this but to attack civilian targets. This was the same strategy used by the now hailed Nelson Mandela of South Africa. Are you calling him a murderer? The Zionists themselves blew up a hotel full of british when they still ruled Palestine because as the palestinians face now they had no military power and no other means. If the palestinians had never started the first and now the second Intafada would they even be recognised? Would they even exist? No.

    2. Re:What you are saying is quite outrageous. by the+morgawr · · Score: 1
      Sigh, You didn't read the AC's history lesson. It's pretty good.....

      Let me remind you of a few things:

      Terrorism existed before the 67 war.

      Between 47 and 67, when the territories were occupied by Egypt and Jordan, there were no terror attacks against the civilians of those countries.

      Before the state of Israel came into existance in 47 there were acts of terror against Jews, many of whom had lived in the region longer for generations.

      When Israel became a state, over a million Jews were driven out of the surrounding arab states by force. There were no acts of terrorism against these states and their civilians.

      These states today (with the exception of Iraq for obvious reasons) still have laws banning Jews from becoming citizens and preventing them from working in many types of jobs.

      In Israel all of the Arabs inside the borders resulting from the 47 were given the same legal rights as Jews.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
  123. How many geeks would work free for this... by Baldrson · · Score: 1

    Imagine offering geeks their own personal sex slave costing only $500-$1000. Then you can see why the Georgia Tech drone isn't necessarily cheaper.

  124. Unmanned vs Uncontrolled by fishybell · · Score: 1

    Although UAV helis are relatively common, completely automated helis are a different, apparently missing, story.

    --
    ><));>
  125. Re:FREEEEE PALESTINE! by BTWR · · Score: 1

    Proof? And I don't mean from an "Independent" or Arab news website - show my proof from some legitimate source (NY Times, CNN, Associated Press) where Israel says it wants to use Nukes.

    BTW, you're a blind fool, but at least I respect the fact that this wasn't an AC post.

  126. Pretty is as pretty does by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    The vertical-dumbbell shaped Guardian UAV looks homely, but as a surveillance platform it makes sense, lots of space for your spy gear on a small airframe and it's not like you have to dogfight with the damn thing...

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  127. Re:Israeli bias, typical North American rhetoric by BTWR · · Score: 1

    Riiiiiight. Once again, it's the "vast Jewish conspiracy." This has been going on for 2,000 years, you're SO nothing-new. Yawn.

  128. Re:Israeli bias, typical North American rhetoric by Umber+Hulk · · Score: 1
    Your sig is very applicable.

    People on the far left and the far right are basically one and the same, with the following differences.

    The far right will let their own government and allies get away with that which they criticize foreign governments for.

    The far left will let foreign governments get away with that which they criticize their own government and allies.

    Far leftists justify this by saying, "One should criticize their country more than foreign countries". True, but leftists also criticize Israel way way more than they criticize Israel's neighbors for doing far worse atrocities.

  129. Insurance and damage by SolemnDragon · · Score: 1
    No matter what, it wouldn't have been worth it. An insurance claim like that makes the premiums jump in far, far greater amounts than the loss itself warrants. And that's if it doesn't get cancelled outright at the next renewal period date. They may not see an insurance payment for years, particularly if it goes into litigation, as often happens.

    The insurance also isn't going to cover the hit that the company is going to take as a result of the loss- If they had reputation insurance (yes, there is such a thing these days) it will come in handy now, but every new contact is going to bring up the question-'hey, aren't you the guys that lost your great big prototype copter?'

  130. Re:Israeli bias, typical North American rhetoric by BTWR · · Score: 1

    The far right will let their own government and allies get away with that which they criticize foreign governments for.
    The far left will let foreign governments get away with that which they criticize their own government and allies.


    Wow. Excellent analogy. I never thought of it like that before, but that's 100% correct.

  131. Re:Easy...NOT! by dmdimon · · Score: 1

    Funny - your answers rated 2 each ;) Go, US, go! ;) ... The Ka you're pointing at is a prototype...

    The Mi-28N and Kamov Ka-50 are competing to fulfil the Russian Army Aviation requirement - now. ....Why would you not consider the Apache Longbow to be one of the world's best helicopter's?....

    Not a problem, yes, it's exactly "one of the best", but not "the best" - this is my point.
    Very hard to tell who is the best - helicopters (and almost any other comparision objects) outperforms each other by different parameters. ... You actually asked if any US copters could do rolls ...

    Ok, as you already noted (I'm sure on this), english is not my primary. So, I asked about pilotage figure vhen hel. flies by vertical circle, going top-side-down in upper point of traectory. Sadly, can't find it right now, but 2-3 years ago such OFFICIAL foto of Ka-50 was very popular. Never seen this before and even beleived (by myself) that it's impossible at all. Was VERY impressed.

    Short semi-official brief;

    The coaxial, contrarotating, three-blade main rotors are widely separated with swept-back tips, and there is no tail rotor. The equally tapered, short, stubby, weapon-carrying wings with end plates are mounted on the streamlined fuselage, which tapers to the front and rear. The fuselage, which is flat-bottomed except for the underbelly gun pod and sensor, features a flat plated glassed-in canopy. The tail is thick with a tapering tail boom and back-tapered tail fin with a square tip. The tail flats are high-mounted on the tail boom with end plates, and located forward of the fin. Twin turboshaft engines are mounted high on the fuselage above the stubby wings, with semicircular air intakes and exhausts that are turned outward.

    The helicopter has a number of unique characteristics including single seat to increase combat and flight characteristics and reduce operational costs. It was designed for remote operations, and not to need ground maintenance facilities for 2 weeks. The airframe is 35% composite materials with a structural central 1m 2 keel beam of kevlar/ nomex that protects critical systems and ammunition. The fully armored pilot's cabin can withstand 23-mm gunfire, and the cockpit glass 12.7-mm MG gunfire. The Zvezda K-37-800 pilot ejection system functions at any altitude, and enables a successful ejection at low altitude and maximum speed.
    External stores are mounted on underwing external hardpoints. Each wing has two hardpoints for a total of four stations. A typical mix for targeting armor formations is 12x AT-16 ATGMs, 500x 30-mm cannon rounds, and 2x 20-round pods of 80-mm folding fin unguided rockets. The 30-mm cannon is the same as on the BMP-2. It also carries guided air-to-air missiles IGLA-V (Needle C), already extensively tested and sold to buyers abroad. The Shark's avionics is largely in line with what is the norm for one-seater fighters and ground attack jets. It's most remarkable feature is a remote targeting system with a capability to provide for a sudden deadly attack from a distance that rules out direct visual contact with the target. The firing computer will turn the aircraft to keep the gun on target. It is equipped with downlink to provide information from the battlefield. The targeting and control system and weaponry enable accurate target engagement at ranges of up to 10km.

    The KA-50 features unique maneuvrability and operating characteristics due to the contra-rotating co-axial rotors. The coaxial counter-rotating rotor system negates the need for a tail rotor and its drive system. Because of this, this aircraft is unaffected by wind strength and direction, has an unlimited hovering turn rate, and gives a smaller profile and acoustic signature, while allowing a 10-15% greater power margin.

    The HOKUM is fully aerobatic. It can perform loops, roll, and "the funnel", where the aircraft will maintain a concentrated point of fire while

  132. Re: Liberty by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    It seems sorta plausible, but it does make the Israeli army look sortof incompetant. I still don't like AIPAC for covering it up in the US, and accusing people of anti-Semitism for pursuing the issue.

  133. Incompetance indeed. by AssafR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Trust me, it can be very incompetant sometimes. Then again, EVERY army can be. For example, up until lately, most casualties in the recent Iraq conflict have been from "friendly fire" and accidents (until the terrorist attack began to escalate in the past few weeks).

    Your other remark I cannot agree with. If it _was_ an accident, and if it was proven so, why is there a need to cover it up? On the contrary, from what I read, Israel apologised and paid some $13 million dollars compensation for the families of the deceased.
    Also , from that point of view, if people continue to raise that issue again and again and again ignoring previous court rulings and inquiry commitees and crying bloody conspiracy, at one point or another one starts to assume there is some kind of prejudice going on.

    When you make the assumption of innocense, these accusations suddenly seem moot.

    - Assaf

  134. Re:Easy...NOT! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    First, let me say thank you for sharing that detailed write up. That's very considerate.

    Funny - your answers rated 2 each ;) Go, US, go! ;)

    Well, glad we're still laughing here! :) I honestly did not mean to make it sound like a raw-raw-go-US thing.

    Not a problem, yes, it's exactly "one of the best", but not "the best" - this is my point.

    Agreed. The apache is not "the best", however, it is a dang fine instrument. Then again, I might be baised...my brother is a Longbow pilot and is stationed in Iraq right now. ;)

    Very hard to tell who is the best - helicopters (and almost any other comparision objects) outperforms each other by different parameters.

    Agreed.

    The helicopter has a number of unique characteristics including single seat to increase combat and flight characteristics and reduce operational costs.

    Most studies show that it does reduce operational costs but greatly reduces combat effectiness. The reason being, on a modern battlefield, most cockpits these days quickly overwork and overload a single pilot. The result is greatly increased chance of human error and/or big reduction in combat effectiviness. So, while it's cost cutting measure, it's not generally considered a combat plus.

    The fully armored pilot's cabin can withstand 23-mm gunfire

    That's actually very impressive. I'd have to look and see what the Apache is rated for, but I'm fiarly sure it's not that good. Just the same, two Apache's in Afganistan where hit with RPG's, one on the front of the cockpit (blew flir system off) and the other took a direct hit on the transmission. Both flew home. Clearly pretty rugged. No pilots were injured.

    The Zvezda K-37-800 pilot ejection system functions at any altitude, and enables a successful ejection at low altitude and maximum speed.

    This is something I spoken about with my brother. Ya, it would be nice to have one, just the same, they are rarely needed in copters like the Apache. The reason being, just about anything that's going to bring you out of the air is probably going to kill you. Those that don't, you can almost always autorotate down. This leaves a tiny, tiny, margin supporting the, "it would be nice", but generally not very useful in real combat. Add in the fact that most attack copters operate 20-150 feet off the ground, it's a big, big "if" that they can even hit the ejection system before they hit the ground in the tiny margin that's left. Still, I have to give the brownie button to the Ka.

    It's most remarkable feature is a remote targeting system with a capability to provide for a sudden deadly attack from a distance that rules out direct visual contact with the target. The firing computer will turn the aircraft to keep the gun on target. It is equipped with downlink to provide information from the battlefield. The targeting and control system and weaponry enable accurate target engagement at ranges of up to 10km.

    Yep, the Apache Longbow does all of that. The targeting computer even allows for indirect fire, bvr, targeting with it's 20mm cannon. In fact, the entire weapon system is designed to allow bvr or over the hill engagment for it's cannon and hellfire missiles. IIRC, a hellfire can be fired up to ~30' off from the target and still be ensured a hit. That greatly increases battlefield confusion along with survivability.

    Also, only a single Apache need expose it self (and then, only the dome on top) to acquire, prioritize, and dispatch targets to all (Generally 5-7) Apache Longbows that's flying with it. To boot, it only has to be exposed for something like 15-20 seconds for a full 360' battlefield/target view. From there, all targets can be engaged and killed without exposing themselves again.

    Oh, and btw, both major Apache variants can fire the sidewinder missile. It's just that the Air Force threw a fit abou

  135. Shitloads of "first ever unmanned helis" by danila · · Score: 1

    It seems that almost everyone and their dog are out their with unique and "first ever" unmanned helicopters. Honda joins the fun with their Robocopter (Ananova)

    Scientists say they have developed the world's first unmanned helicopter that's flown entirely by artificial intelligence. Honda says its miniature Robocopter can detect and negotiate obstacles on the way to its destination. After each flight it becomes more sophisticated by recording and comparing data about previous voyages. Spokesman Martin Moll said: ''The helicopter is amazing it really is a breakthrough in artificial intelligence. ''We hope that through the helicopter project we will be able to develop safer cars that can automatically find their way around obstacles and obstructions."

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  136. Re:no, zionists suck by the+morgawr · · Score: 1
    >Anti-Israel =! Pro-Hamas

    Exept you never crisize Hamas, you only Critisize Israel. I don't think anyone here is going to equate the two. Purposefully critisizing one group over the other is racism, bigotry, and, in this case, a form of anti-semitism.

    In your case, it's just a profound lack of knowledge about the facts, because, like most people, you've been brain washed into believing that if you heard it on TV, it must be true.

    --
    The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
  137. Re:no, zionists suck by the+morgawr · · Score: 1
    Two things:

    Your numbers are way fudged.

    Until 1998 the military occasionaly targeted firetrucks and ambulances because terrorists would highjack them and use them as get away cars. In 1998 the Israeli Supreme Court ruled that this violated Israeli Law (they might accidentally shoot the other occupants) and forced the military to stop.

    --
    The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
  138. Re: Liberty by rifter · · Score: 1

    Also, the Liberty was not supposed to be there in the first place and was spying on the Israelis (which is why we did not tell them it was there).

  139. Re:Or let someone else guess by rifter · · Score: 1

    "Are they? They have got a lot of headlines, but do suicide bombings actually achieve anything other than convince the target that the terrorists cannot be negotiated with, only eliminated?"

    It seemed to have worked in Algeria.

    The difference in Algeria was twofold. Firstly the terrorists attacked real military targets rather than futzing around blowing up malls like the losers in Hamas. Second they raised an actual army to fight the French militarily.

    Likewise in the Israeli war for independence civilian targets were avoided.

    There is no record of terrorism against civilian targets ever making a revolution successful. Even Che Gueverra and Fidel Castro knew you have to get the people on your side to be successful in guerrilla warfare, which terrorism as practiced by Hamas is not and does not do.

    Face it, the "Palestinian" movement is a farce. Arafat is not even from the region. He is Egyptian. Even if he gets everything he wants, the Palestinians will be enslaved. Why would anyone who truly wants these people's rights respected support his cause? If Israel governed the whole, they would be better off because they would be part of a secular democratic republic and would have the right to vote. Arafat wants to be a dictator.

    Then there is the fact that there is no such thing as the "Palestinian people" in the sense of a shared distinct ethnic, linguistic, or cultural heritage. These are Arabs who happen to have lived in the area for a few generations who come from a variety of backgrounds, specifically those of the neighbouring Arab nations. Every one of those nations is in a horrible state, ruled by a dictator who tortures his own people. But when Americans try to point this out the dictators try to claim that all of the region's problems are the fault of the Israelis. Whatever.

  140. Re:Easy...NOT! by dmdimon · · Score: 1

    Best wishes to your broz.

  141. Re:FREEEEE PALESTINE! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    From The Jerusalem Post:

    Oct. 23, 2003
    Army has plan to expel Arafat
    By ARIEH O'SULLIVAN

    The IDF is ready to carry out the cabinet's decision to remove Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat the moment the orders are given, a senior military source told The Jerusalem Post Wednesday.

    "We have presented plans showing the risks and the chances of the operation itself, including the options to remove him alive or not," he said.
    "The government has to make a decision to allow the army to act. The army is ready. The army always plans for all possibilities," he said.

    He said the near constant deployment of forces in the territories since the violence erupted three years ago is not fatiguing troops.

    "I'm not worried. The battalions are strong and have high standards and are working well. Every four months, new soldiers are added to the fighting and officers are rotated. The standing army can keep this up for years," he said.
    He added that the current conflict will not end with a major military measure.

    "We can stage a major operation again, like Defensive Shield. We can do one in the Gaza Strip," he said.

    "But this conflict is one of stamina between the Palestinian and Israeli societies. What concerns me is the resilience and stamina of the Israeli society," he added.

    He presented a pessimistic view of reaching any agreement with the present Palestinian Authority leadership, which he said is continuing to reject a two-state solution. He said Arafat chose terror to avoid making an agreement.

    "Arafat thinks that by demographics and terrorism there will be one state and it won't be Jewish," he said.

    "Arafat doesn't care about what to do with the Palestinians. He cares about his place in history.
    "Now, as we mark the 30th anniversary of the Yom Kippur War, I suggest we examine ourselves to make sure we are not prisoner to the conception that we have a formula for a solution," he said. "It could be we have it, but the Palestinians are not cooperating."

    [SEE BELOW}

    He said Israel is capable of violent rage against an enemy and warned that there could be a point at which the Palestinians could certainly spark it.
    "[Dresden] or Nagasaki or Hiroshima?" he sighed, referring to allied bombing of German civilians and the two US atomic bombs that ended World War II. "I don't think we are at that point, but it could be that the Palestinians will bring us to this at some point.

    [SEE ABOVE]

    "If it becomes clear to us that even after Arafat, the leadership that takes over is not a partner for any kind of solution or arrangement, I presume Israeli society will start to discuss other options. It wouldn't go without the legitimacy of society [behind a military solution]."

    Regarding Syria, he said President Bashar Assad is currently "embarrassed" by the IAF attack on an alleged terrorist training camp two weeks ago.
    "You have an army with 450,000 men in Syria, but we have been able to open a gap in relative advantage which has been translated into deterrence," he said. "We can deal with the Syrian threat. It is not existential.

    "Israel has significant deterrence over Syria today. We see it. We struck at a terrorist target in Syria and there is embarrassment there. If we had not been deterring the Syrians and Hizbullah, then I think that the northern front would have been a lot hotter.

    "The Syrians have this deterrence out of fear that escalation in the North would put the Syrian army to the test," he said. "If they felt the Syrian army was strong enough to stand up to the IDF, they would have let Hizbullah be more daring. They prefer the Palestinian front and are responsible for a lot of what is happening here. They prefer this because they thought we would not link the two fronts. Our last strike put the responsibility on them for what is happening here."

    He said $40,000 was transferred from Syria to a terrorist cell in Nablus which attempted to carry out four attacks which the se

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!