Slashdot Mirror


Doomsday PC-Cooling With Dual-Cascade Coolers

An anonymous reader submits "Four (4) compressors cooling one PC! Yes, it's big, yes it's heavy, yes it's loud and yes it does get your CPU and GPU cold, very cold. Is -100C cold enough for you? Cascade cooling is yet another chapter in a Finnish overclocker's neverending quest for optimal PC performance. Those things go down to -80 to -100C and can maintain the temperature. See here for the whole article with the pictures of the project."

311 comments

  1. In Finland... by inteller · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....wouldn't they just put their computers outside to get this kind of cooling?

    1. Re:In Finland... by msmikkol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But its the damn Gulf stream in the Atlantic that keeps (at least) southern Finland relatively warm, considering the geographic location...

      --
      The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error.
      -Bertolt Brecht
    2. Re:In Finland... by Soporific · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know that's what we do here in Minnesota. Of course we only can overclock for what seems like 11 months out of the year, but you do have to get out every now and then to soak up some vitamin D. ~S

    3. Re:In Finland... by Shut+the+fuck+up! · · Score: 5, Funny

      ....wouldn't they just put their computers outside to get this kind of cooling?

      No, you got it all wrong. He is overclocking to stay warm. All those compressors must generate a lot of heat.

    4. Re:In Finland... by apharov · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry to disappoint you with this, but it really doesn't work that way... While the temperatures would be quite about the same as in this refrigerator the terrible weather would kill any computer in a few seconds ;)

      Seriously though, often in winter when I have had to melt my freezer / refrigerator I've just put the foodstuffs in a box on the windowsill and opened the ventilation window. Everything stays frozen for at least long enough to to get the extra ice out of the freezer. I'm saying this as a Finn of course :)

    5. Re:In Finland... by Pieroxy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While putting the computer outside is a stupid idea, I can think of a very simple system over there. Just drill two 1-inch wide holes in the wall next to your computer, attach two tubes to it and link them at the CPU fan level. This way the fan will get fresh air from outside to the CPU, and then throw it out. After all, that's what the compressor is all about: Getting something cold. The air outside should do it.

      Of course, you need to drill holes in your house...

    6. Re:In Finland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG, the retardsmanship of some people on /. is extraordinary

    7. Re:In Finland... by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's an idea for cheap, effective cooling I've had too. Just add a couple filters so you don't get crap inside your computer, and it would be pretty effective in cold weather.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    8. Re:In Finland... by Zapper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just make the holes a bit bigger and you may have an internal NIC for this guy.

      --
      So much to do, so little bandwidth.
      --
      Try Mozilla
    9. Re:In Finland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just mod a small upright or chest freezer into a computer case? Sure, it wouldn't get as cold, but it would be cheaper, and you could use the extra space to get your beer cold.

    10. Re:In Finland... by Matthaeus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you do this, be sure that you water-harden your motherboard around your processor.

      Nasty airborne water molecules condensing on my hardware...snort.

    11. Re:In Finland... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      I need the heat to heat up my room damnit! I don't have any extra heat to waste.

      -

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    12. Re:In Finland... by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't do this if they're sandblasting your building.
      One PSU & one CD-R drive are now sitting somewhere in a Finnish landfill because of grit.

      YAW.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    13. Re:In Finland... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Here in NY USA I can often put food outside from January through April, and save my electric bill - the freezer becomes redundant. In my room, the SMP machines keep a comfortable temperature (for myself and them) with the windows open all year.

      --
      C|N>K
    14. Re:In Finland... by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sort of like In Soviet Finland, refridgerators heat your house? Very amusing.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    15. Re:In Finland... by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Of course, I didn't go into much details. You would use a couple of filters!

    16. Re:In Finland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not anymore, with this climate warming and all... There's hardly any snow in central Finland and it's already mid-december... :/

    17. Re:In Finland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finland is actually doing OK in that regard. I live in neighbouring Sweden, and our country has already been invaded. Well, not invaded by force, instead our nice socialist government ruling this One Party state has let it happen. Now the country is truly fucked.

    18. Re:In Finland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soviet Finland? There has never been Soviet Finland. I'm pretty sure about this because I live in Finland. :)

    19. Re:In Finland... by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      It was a joke. I know about Finland too, just a little bit, because I've visited Helsinki. I thought that it was a very beautiful city. We planned a week in the city, and wished that we had planned two weeks.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    20. Re:In Finland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this talk of drilling holes bigger and internal NICs almost made me think that was a goatse link.

      Thank god it's just about carrier pigeons.

    21. Re:In Finland... by RLW · · Score: 1

      Instead you could make a closed loop heat exchange.
      You'll need to 1.5" to 2" ID tubes that you can wind together so that the heat from one tube may be exchanged to the other. Thin copper tubing should work well for this purpose. One of the tubes is connected at both ends to the out with a fan to drive air into it. The other is connected accross your heat sink(s) for your computer. you'll still want to use an air filter for the exterior air pipe to help keep it from becoming cloged. By seperating the two lines and restring the outside air, you'll not be adding dirt to your PC.

      Out.........Out
      Side........Side
      Intake.....Ex haust Fan
      I.............I
      I.............I
      I.......... ...I Thermal intercooler
      -_-_-_-_- The plumbining here allows the heat to
      I.............I exchange with out allowing the air to exchange.
      I.............I
      I.............I
      ---CP U---Ciruculating
      Fan

    22. Re:In Finland... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You only have to worry about condensation if you manage to get your hardware cooler than the ambiant outdoor temperature. Clearly, your board and chips will be warmer than the air for outside that you are using to cool, so if any water was going to condence out of said air, it would have done so already, outside.

      For the same reason, you can still operate your system on a hot humid summer day indoors.

    23. Re:In Finland... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      like In Soviet Finland, refridgerators heat your house?

      You are misinformed.

      Refrigerators are actually used to heat houses in the land of Rand McNally, where they wear hats on their feet and hamburgers eat people!

    24. Re:In Finland... by ooby · · Score: 1

      Actually, refridgerators do heat houses, and not just in Soviet Finnland, Rand McNally and Strong Badia even.

      What do you suppose happens to all that energy coming from the refridgerated food? It doesn't just go away. Heat from the fridge heats houses. It's the law!

    25. Re:In Finland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't they????

      1 word. Condensation.

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Not Quite by qewl · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not cold enough unless it can offset global warming. AND refrigerate my beer.

    --

    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
    1. Re:Not Quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any cooling device creates more heat then it removes, due to some law ot theromdynamics.

    2. Re:Not Quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Offset global warming? I think this thing might be a contributing factor.

    3. Re:Not Quite by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
      It's not cold enough unless it can offset global warming.

      No, it's not cold enough unless it can withstand a slashdotting without bursting into flames.

      I think they should have spent more time cooling their webserver, cause that puppy's crisp. Or mysql melted down...ba da dum dum dum, another mysql bites the dust...

    4. Re:Not Quite by viniosity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Impossible due to the first law of thermodynamics which states that energy can be neither created nor destroyed. Here's a good link to brush up on your thermo101:

      http://www.geog.ouc.bc.ca/physgeog/contents/6e.h tm l

    5. Re:Not Quite by rokzy · · Score: 1

      the second.

    6. Re:Not Quite by notyou2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Lisa, in this house... --[fuck it, nevermind]--

    7. Re:Not Quite by ottffssent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not quite, yourself.

      Consider a heatsink. It removes lots of heat from a CPU, but generates no heat at all. That said, any devices which cools something beyond ambient temperature will generate heat of its own, which is nearly what you said.

    8. Re:Not Quite by psoriac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd link you to a site explaining humor, but I think it would be a lost cause.

      --
      I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
    9. Re:Not Quite by psoriac · · Score: 1

      Oh well, I guess one out of two ain't bad.

      Tough luck on the beer.

      --
      I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
    10. Re:Not Quite by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      Again, not quite.

      If the cooling device is active (i.e. requires energy other than the heat it is moving to operate), it generates some waste heat.

      Sorry to be a pedant, but your model leaves out active cooling devices that try valiantly to cool their subject below ambient temperature, but can't quite keep up.

    11. Re:Not Quite by nchrist13 · · Score: 1

      actually all you need is to continually conduct endothermic reactions to produce the liquid N2, therefore the first law of thermo wouldn't be broken.

    12. Re:Not Quite by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I suppose that's why they call it the "first approximation". You see that in electronics, too. Normally, we use the second approximation. (transistor acts like a switch minus .7V, etc.)

    13. Re:Not Quite by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      How does the big bang fit into this? The universe is just matter (or energy, they're equivalent, no?) that came from nowhere. Doesn't this violate what you were taught in thermo101?

    14. Re:Not Quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory Simpsons quote:

      "In this house, young lady, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!"

    15. Re:Not Quite by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Please explain, how it is impossible? Earth is not the entire universe. We do have other places to get energy sources if we can ever reach them. If there was a machine that could cool beer and offset global warming all it would have to do is move all its heat off planet. Duh.

  4. IMAGINE.... by TheDarkener · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Beowulf cluster of compressors on a Beowulf cluster of computers!

    Umm.....

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  5. In alaska... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we just run a power and ethernet cable outside and leave the side of the case off. What is the big deal ? :)

    1. Re:In alaska... by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      Snow == water Doh!

    2. Re:In alaska... by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Only if it melts... We're talking about Alaska here though.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
  6. Billy Bob? by pegr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Billy Bob, don't cha think ya got a little too much time on your hands?

  7. Does this make it a: by cliffy2000 · · Score: 1

    Superconducting supercomputer?

    1. Re:Does this make it a: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      short answer - No
      long answer - not even close... put it down alot closer to 0K and we might get some superconducting, but of course the silicon will be destroyed...

    2. Re:Does this make it a: by Josh+Booth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, but with the right materials and time to develop a Pentium with superconducting transistors, they are only 13 K away from being able to use a "high temperature" superconductor. -100 C is 173 K, and according to my link, one of the highest temperature superconductor they have found works at 160 K. Not that I RTFA; it was /.ed at 50 posts.

    3. Re:Does this make it a: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from your website, "I am very interested in science"
      NERD ALERT! NERD ALERT!

    4. Re:Does this make it a: by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      I don't think we can have superconducting transistors. See a transistor works on the principle of semiconductors, materials that are insulating except under certain conditions... superconductors are always perfect conductors, and therefore can't be used in switching circuitry.

      Now you could use it for bus fabric and the like; The biggest advantage there is that superconductors don't radiate radio waves except in the presence of an external magnetic field (the electromagnetic force symmetry is broken in a superconductor, because the electrons all have spins of 0)... that would make system design much easier. The only other advantage of using superconductors in this kind of application would be in your heat-sink material itself; superconductors are perfect conductors of not only electricity, but of heat as well. A super conductor is measurably the same temperature throughout. Actually, heat spreads through it at the speed of light; unless you're talking about a very big super conductor and a very big heatsource, it makes no difference.

      So you can plate the top of all your chips with this super conductive material, and have one tiny thin little wire of superconductor linking them all, and that wire goes to your compressor, where there is a superconductor heatsink that is cooled. The temperature of a superconductor is an average of all the heat deltas over area; the more area inside the compressor, the cooler it'll be...

      The only problem is that you can't turn it off; if you do, the superconductor will stop being superconducting. And you've got to get it back down to temperature before it'll be superconducting again. Actually, there's a lot of research into what happens when a large sample of superconductor is cooled down, and what exactly happens when it becomes superconductor; my best guess in a situation like this is that you'd have superconducting domains, starting in the heatsink of the compressor; they'd cool down, become superconducting, and then warm back up through improved thermal transfer with surrounding regions, so they would not be superconducting any more. This cycle would repeat until the entire sample is superconducting...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  8. Cold feet by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wouldn't your legs and feet get cold sitting next to that thing?

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:Cold feet by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Actually, the compressors produce heat on the outside of the system.

      --
      Martin
  9. Practical application? by Aviancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps they should consider applying this research to their webserver, which appears to be having dififculties keeping up with requests ATM...

  10. Nice. by i_am_syco · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like Intel might license this for their new P4s at 4 GHz. After cooling it down, the chip is almost cool enough to run!

    1. Re:Nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because we all know AMD's never had heat problems...

      Oh wait...never mind.

  11. neverending quest? by toddhunter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Keep playing around with stuff at -100 and the quest is going to end one way or another

  12. big and heavy? by civilengineer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, it's big, yes it's heavy, yes it's loud and yes it does get your CPU and GPU cold, very cold.
    You talking about my wife?

    --

    New year Resolution: Don't change sig this year
    1. Re:big and heavy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is your wife, you're not getting any tonight

    2. Re:big and heavy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lies! There are no women on slashdot, everyone knows that!

    3. Re:big and heavy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It's about Eugenia Loli-Quockbiter or whatever the hell her name is. The OSNews.com cow, you know.

    4. Re:big and heavy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just heard your husband yell "oh thank GOD"...

      moooo...

  13. slashdotted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nope, that cooling doesn't work.... their server is already slashdotted ;)

  14. absolute zero? by psoriac · · Score: 4, Funny

    How close to absolute zero would we have to cool a processor so that we could overclock it enough to handle a good slashdotting?

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
    1. Re:absolute zero? by BugZRevengE · · Score: 1

      well we know -100 is not close enough...

      --
      Why me? Why not!
      BACKUP YOUR PARTITIONS
    2. Re:absolute zero? by Raynach · · Score: 1

      I always find it extremely ironic that the sites that get slashdotted the most are the ones talking about recent news in hardware. Someone's got to make the witty comment that the new hardware can't handle the barrage of slashdotters, but, yet, it's gotta be on the hardware, doesn't it...

      --
      - A
    3. Re:absolute zero? by nadadogg · · Score: 1

      Well, there have been stress tests where people show BSD handling upwards of 2 million concurrent connections, so if they run a good open-source the software is not at fault :)

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    4. Re:absolute zero? by satanicat · · Score: 1

      Wait, I can see the new future of stress/security testing.

      submit to slashdot:

      "You can't get ME Crackers!"
      re: http://www.xxxxxx.com
      btw, linux sucks!

      hmm, you know, you may be on to something. . sounds to me like security holes could be found relatively quickly=)

      --
      How Now Brown Cow
  15. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the point of all this is what exactly???

    For the money he spent on the setup and for the energy costs down the road, he could have bought and powered many normal machines.

    I don't understand paying massive costs to get the last marginal increases in performance.

    1. Re:I don't get it by Excen · · Score: 1

      And the point of all this is what exactly???

      To compensate for small penile shaft size and girth, dude. Duh, seriously. . .

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    2. Re:I don't get it by Lothsahn · · Score: 1

      Because, It's COOL.

      That's what it's all about.

      It's like drag racing. Drag cars can't drive for more than 1 or 2 miles before they need another tank of gas... plus, many drag cars have top speeds less than street cars. Whatever speed they hit at the end of the 1/4 mile is their top speed, their transmission is geared that way.

      Drag racers aren't practical, but they're fun... that's all there is to it.

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    3. Re:I don't get it by leprasmurf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't understand paying massive costs to get the last marginal increases in performance.
      Oh, I don't know, I think its pretty obvious why...because he can. No other reason is needed. Its all about the bragging rights, yeah baby yeah
      --
      "And The Geek Shall Inherit The Earth" --Jeff Darlington
    4. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Most dragsters finish the quarter mile in under 2.5 seconds at over 300mph.

      So, i don't know what kind of cars you drive but there may only be a dozen street legal cars that can hit 300mph.

    5. Re:I don't get it by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Fastest possible single thread SISD performance. Multimachine setups can't do the same thing.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    6. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, bullshit they don't finish in under 2.5 seconds, more like 4.5. Second, I'm impressed you know of ONE street legal car that can hit 500km/h, name it for me.

  16. if you need this much power to cool your machine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doesn't this mean that there is an inherent problem somewhere?!?! Maybe the architecture is flawed?

  17. And in the time he built it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....newer, better processors came out.

  18. Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by MikeCapone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Doesn't it defeat the purpose of overclocking?

    I thought you did that to get more out of your CPU than what you paid for.

    If you are spending more on the cooling than on the computer, then why not get a faster one, or a second one (or dual, or whatever)?

    Heh, I guess there's the whole hobby "I do it because it's fun!" thing that explains it...

    1. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by Kentamanos · · Score: 1

      The really bad part is he's planning to make a homebrewed Tivo out of the machine. ;)

    2. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Extreme overclocking often takes the fastest available processor and then overclocks it as much as possible. The goal is not the most bang for your buck, but purely the most bang.

    3. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by en4ca · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What money? He said he got both cryofreezers for free, because they weren't workign originally. So the only cost is his time.

    4. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by MikeCapone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Extreme overclocking often takes the fastest available processor and then overclocks it as much as possible. The goal is not the most bang for your buck, but purely the most bang.

      Yes, but as I said in my original post, wouldn't the "most bang" come from buying other CPUs, instead of making the one(s) you have run X% faster, with that money?

      I'll bet that cooling rig is worth a bunch of Opterons...

    5. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by bash_jeremy · · Score: 1

      He got the cooling equipment for free.

    6. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      What money? He said he got both cryofreezers for free, because they weren't workign originally. So the only cost is his time.

      Well, my point still stands for the other m4d 0v3k1ll cooling projects out there.

      As for the present case, I couldn't read the article because it was slashdotted, so I didn't know he acquired the material for free.

      Yeah, I know, RTFA...

    7. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      I'll bet that cooling rig is worth a bunch of Opterons
      Well, he got them for free because they were "dead" and didn't appear to have much problem getting them running again (as in not a lot of parts), so I think you're mistaken.

      But you seem to be missing the point that you can't buy a P4 that goes faster than 3.2GHz, yet this rig was reaching speeds of 4.4GHz. Admittedly he was starting with a 3GHz CPU, but the price jump for the extra 200MHz would have been a lot more than this cooling rig cost him -- and it could be used with a faster CPU anyway.

    8. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      Well, he got them for free because they were "dead" and didn't appear to have much problem getting them running again (as in not a lot of parts), so I think you're mistaken.

      I said elsewhere that I didn't know that he got the material for free since (the article was slashdotted not long after I loaded up the page, but I saw pictures of pretty expensive looking equipment).

      I still think my point stands for most people who will sink lots of money into overclocking.

      But you seem to be missing the point that you can't buy a P4 that goes faster than 3.2GHz, yet this rig was reaching speeds of 4.4GHz. Admittedly he was starting with a 3GHz CPU, but the price jump for the extra 200MHz would have been a lot more than this cooling rig cost him -- and it could be used with a faster CPU anyway.

      It makes sense in some case if things can only be done with a single CPU (ie. gaming), but if he's doing TiVO stuff (as I think he's doing) or database or whatever, it'd be more efficient (if he hadn't had the material for free, I mean) to buy more hardware (RAM, dual procs, dedicated DSPs, faster hds, etc) instead of more cooling.

    9. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, he got the equipment for free (give or take fixing it: RTFA). As it stands, not a very practical general solution, but a really cool (pun intended) one off that may spur some new research somewhere.

    10. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      I still think my point stands for most people who will sink lots of money into overclocking.
      I don't. I doubt that typical overclockers would, for example, buy a $100 CPU then add $200 worth of cooling equipment for a system that performed worse than a $300 CPU (or a $200 CPU with $100 worth of cooling equipment). I also fail to see why you're so concerned about how someone chooses to invest in their PC. I've never considered overclocking a PC, but then I've never needed the extra performance above and beyond what I can afford running at factory speeds. If I suddenly felt the need for more power than I could easily afford, I'd certainly consider any overclocking technique I was capable of attempting. It's just an option.
    11. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody worries about overclocking for anything but gaming. Gaming requires you to get the most out of your single processor. He mentions cooling the GPU as well.

    12. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      What makes you think he's doing TiVO stuff on this? From what I can tell he built the box to show that it could be done and to get the highest clock speed on some ongoing contest. He even said near the end of the article how his normal everyday use computer is much much quieter than this one.

      I thought the electricy bill on that computer would make it cost prohibitive to run regularly.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    13. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by Teknon · · Score: 0

      I thinnk that you are still missing the point - He isn't trying to get the most for his money - he is trying to get the most out of that particular processor. Yes it would probably be a better use of the $ to spend it on a whole bunck of Opteron, as you said. And those Opterons would probably give more power than this one processor that is insanely overclocked. That, however, in't what he was trying to accomplish. He had a processor (2, I think from reading the article - an Athlon and a Pentium 4) and he wanted to see how far he could push them. IN which case buying a bunch of Opterons wouldn't produce te same effect.

      Besides, this cooling system would work on Opterons as well - and from reading this guy's site, he probably would try th same thing on a Opteron if he had one.

    14. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Of course, when you destroy your top-of-the-line, bleeding-edge processor chip trying to Extreme Overclock it, you're out several hundred dollars. Unless you can convince Intel that the unit was broken right out of the fabrication plant and get them to replace it under warranty; maybe that strategy works.

      What's the point of overclocking a 3.0GHz chip to 3.5GHz anyway? Unless you're similarly overclocking your peripheral bus, memory, hard drives, the electron gun in your CRT, and the fingers typing on your keyboard, you're going to run into performance bottlenecks long before that extra processing power comes into play, in most every situation.

      Sure, yeah, it's fun to hack for hack's sake, but there's got to be cheaper ways to indulge in the hobby...

    15. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      For some it's more than a hobby!

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  19. Does it help, though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At a given clock speed, is there any benefit to having supercool temperatures?

    e.g. Is 3.5GHz at 10C better than 3.5GHz at 15C?

    What about -10C?

    1. Re:Does it help, though? by jlaxson · · Score: 1

      No, the idea is that at cooler temps you can run at faster speeds (which generate more heat, which is why you need the cooling).

      --
      On Apple Input Peripherals: They're okay, I guess, but I was really hoping for a one-key keyboard and a 109-button mouse
  20. Re:minimum temperature by daemon_underscore · · Score: 0

    Liquid helium? Why settle for a noble gas? I think liquid hydrogen is the cooling liquid of choice for people trying to destroy parts of their neighborhood when the heat from their overclocked PC melts the metal on the cooling tubes.

  21. Damaging to the machines? by Alphanos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know much about this kind of cooling, but if the compressors are being used to cool the air going through these machines, wouldn't they be worried about physically damaging the machines by cracking them? Keeping a computer cool is all well and good, but at a certain temperature the physical elements composing the hardware are bound to contract different amounts, causing damage. Maybe this only happens at -250 degrees, and not -100, but presumably there is a reason that hardware manufacturers state a minimum operating temperature for their components.

    --
    Alphanos
    1. Re:Damaging to the machines? by captaink · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the exact same thing..

      Surely this isn't a problem however, otherwise they wouldn't have written this article and claimed success. ..then again, they could make this claim and no-one would really know any different.. I can't imagine anyone else would be willing to try it for quite some time :P

      --
      --- If I were a fish, I'd be wet
    2. Re:Damaging to the machines? by blair1q · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Minimum operating temperature is specified only because they test them to that temperature.

      They have no idea at all how much lower they can go before they fail.

      Same with maxima.

    3. Re:Damaging to the machines? by TSR+Wedge · · Score: 1

      I would expect that point to be closer to -100 than -250, since absolute zero is only 23.15 degrees C lower...

      --
      What if the hokey-pokey really is what it's all about?
    4. Re:Damaging to the machines? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even glass doesn't crack unless you heat (or cool) it unevenly and rapidly. Most if not all of the materials used in a computer will be more tolerant of temperature differentials across them than glass will, except in the cases where they utilize glass (in some laptop hard drives.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Damaging to the machines? by Alphanos · · Score: 1

      Although anecdotal evidence is no proof, I have had a hard drive die after being stored in an unheated garage during winter. This is Canadian winter, so it's pretty cold, but still nowhere near -100 :).

      --
      Alphanos
    6. Re:Damaging to the machines? by CmdrWass · · Score: 1

      That's not exactly true. If a company wishes to be a potential vendor to the U.S. Armed Forces, then it must pass certain guidelines for high and low temperatures, as well as shock, and a few other things. IIRC the standard is -30 degrees, and many hardware vendors fail to meet this guideline. For the longest time, the military used Sun products because they are/were one of the few vendors to meet all of the criteria. This is why I am a little suspect about the original article.

    7. Re:Damaging to the machines? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a load of hooey.

      The traditional temperature ranges are

      -40 to +85C Commercial
      -55 to +125C Military

      You'll sometimes see them munged for marketability:

      +0 to +70 Commercial
      -20 to +75 Extended
      -40 to +85 Industrial
      -55 to +125 Military

      And sometimes there will be "storage" temperatures in the spec.

      There's no reason to believe that a manufacturer bothered to test outside the ranges he lists in his specs.

      And Sun boxen used to dominate military acquisitions for all but clerical purchases (where DEC was favored) because they used to be significantly more powerful than PCs, much more stable (rebooting a Wintel PC twice a day is poor performance), and they were familiar to the software developers, few of whom had learned to program serious code on PCs. Plus Sun used to have a clue, or had made a lucky strategic decision, about marketing computers. None of those things is true any more.

    8. Re:Damaging to the machines? by retinaburn · · Score: 1

      Did you look at the pics. The cold air is being concentrated on the CPU. There was no indication to how cold the surrounding area got, but I wouldn't think much. The tube seems to be insulated, after all he only wants to cool whatever the end of the tube is touching, not his whole house ...its Finland after all.

    9. Re:Damaging to the machines? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Cold causes "stiction", I'm not sure what freezes but it's something in the drive spindle system. If you were to open the hard drive in a clean environment (so you don't get dust in it) and manually turn the spindle, which might require some significant effort, then it would almost certainly fix the drive. Assuming, of course, that the problem is that it won't spin up. Older Seagate drives (older like, in the age of MFM) were particularly prone to this problem, to the point where we called them "Seizegates", and they would develop stiction after temperature variations of only twenty degrees or so. The 5.25" drive platters had enough rotational inertia to where you could commonly fix the problem by putting the drive on a soft surface (like your bed) and whacking it rotationally on one corner with a screwdriver handle. The 3.5" drives, however, commonly had to be opened.

      I have fixed a number of semi-modern drives, which is to say 3.5x1" drives of up to about 500MB in capacity, with the screwdriver trick, but more modern drives generally do not develop stiction.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Damaging to the machines? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      Repeated change in temperatures is also very stressful on electronic components, so heating/cooling/heating/cooling... will cause that expansion and contraction to break some things after a while.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  22. Time = Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you wait and actually put the PC to some practical use, instead of modifying, you can get a faster PC for the price you paid for the original PC plus Time and Modifications.

    1. Re:Time = Money by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Having gone this far, he can put a new state-of-the-art processor in his cool machine.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  23. The finnish ... by KRYnosemg33 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's the finnish word for ... compensating?

    1. Re:The finnish ... by drquizas · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't it Linux?

    2. Re:The finnish ... by phorm · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think that applies in this case. At those temperature anyone sitting near the computer will experience shrinkage in a ratio comparable to the increase in PC performace.

    3. Re:The finnish ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      What's the finnish word for ... compensating?


      "kompensaatioliiketoimi", or a word starting with "korva", depending on what you're compensating.
    4. Re:The finnish ... by Fizzl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't know what meaning of the word are you searching for. So here's few:

      kompensoida = compensate
      hyvittaa = compensate as in reimburse
      korvata = almost, but now quite, a synonym for hyvittaa.
      kumota = compensate as in neutralize

      have fun :)

  24. Obligatory joke by apharov · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...as if having a CPU running at -100C would save them from server meltdown when the full brunt of brutal slashdotting hits them!!

    Muahahahaaa.. <manical laughter echoing in the dungeon>

  25. counterproductive by mkavanagh · · Score: 3, Funny

    looks like someone is ignoring the fact that overcooling your processor will lead to early failure.

    1. Re:counterproductive by randyest · · Score: 1

      really? how does that happen?

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:counterproductive by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Maybe. If the machine goes through a lot of thermal cycles, the cycling could be a problem. Differential expansion can cause fatigue. Continuous operation at low temperature should extend life compared to continuous operation at high temperature.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  26. Why? by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just that - Why?

    Hey, I can appreciate water cooling. Keep the chip at basically room temperature, it increases its life and the OC'ers can push it a bit. But -100? WHY??? What possible use can this serve?

    It doesn't even seem "cool" at this point (beyond the obvious pun). Wasting hundreds of watts, taking up way too much room (extra-large form-factor, anyone?), needing a fork-lift to move it... How does any of that benefit the PC or user?

    Some things have an upper limit to what still constitutes "bigger/better/faster/harder". This definitely crosses that line with regard to chip cooling techniques.

    1. Re:Why? by wackybrit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because the colder you make a processor, the further you can push it.

      If you can keep a chip at 0 celsius (as you can with many PC cooling units out there), you can get at least another 1GHz out of your chip, meaning your 3GHz PC is now a 4GHz power house.

      And so it goes with the lower you go. At -100C you could probably keep your 3GHz PC up at around the 14GHz area, which is way faster than anything on the market. Isn't it worth the money on cooling to experience a slice of tomorrow?

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet porting Linux to your toaster has obvious benefits for all mankind...

    3. Re:Why? by virtualkuz · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure that after -0c you start to get diminishing returns. 14ghz out of a consumer part is completely unrealistic. I know just about a year ago intel was able to get a test lab ALU to go 10ghz. I really don't see a normal p4 going more than 5-5.5 ghz even with extreme cooling, if you go to cold the electrons won't move anymore and you are dead in the water.

    4. Re:Why? by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Informative
      And so it goes with the lower you go. At -100C you could probably keep your 3GHz PC up at around the 14GHz area, which is way faster than anything on the market. Isn't it worth the money on cooling to experience a slice of tomorrow?

      This works to a point...but there are physical limits to how fast a present-day chip can be overclocked. Aside from potential limits on how fast gates can switch inside the chips, you start running into concerns about things like the speed of light.

      At a hypothetical 15 GHz, light will travel 2 centimetres (about 0.8 inches) per clock cycle. The Pentium 4 die is about 1.7 cm on a side, with a 2.1 cm diagonal. If one corner of the chip needs to talk to the other corner of the chip, it will take a minimum of two clock cycles just for the signal to travel there and back--and that neglects the fact that electrons move slower than light. You can bet that Intel's designers didn't anticipate those kinds of timing issues.

      So you might be able to clock a 3 GHz chip to 4 or 4.5 GHz with this setup, and do so much more stably with less wear and tear on the chip--but you're not going to be able to scale the chip's speed to 10 or 15 GHz.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some things have an upper limit to what still constitutes "bigger/better/faster/harder".

      I agree. Your wife told me the same thing last night.

    6. Re:Why? by asit+ler · · Score: 0

      ssh -l bread toaster.myhouse.com
      su -
      cd toast-2.3.0 ./configure --insert-bread
      make toast

      It's all there, It's a RMS plot to control every toaster and toaster oven in the world!

      This space intentionally left filled.

      --
      This is not the sig you're looking for.
    7. Re:Why? by lafiel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The electrons won't move anymore?

      With all due respect (since your actual point is correct), you're certainly wrong in regards to electron 'movement'. Unless you're talking about absolute zero (which I doubt, considering the simpleness of your statement), the stage where extreme cooling creates a problem would be when we reach the superconductive state. At this critical temperature, the electrons exhibit the Cooper-Pair phenomenon and exhibit a total spin number of zero. Since they no longer have the same spin, they are exempt from most principles (Pauli's in particular) and so can all drop down to the 1s orbital.

      In short, the electrons don't stop moving. In fact, they drop to such a state where they can theoretically move with zero resistance (although drift velocity and the randomness of their wave equations would come into play here).

      What you should actually be pointing at is the design of the chip, which may not simply be able to do more, regardless of how much heat is dissipated due to consumption (generating lattice fluctuations and increasing resistance). As well, quantum tunneling becomes a major issue, but this isn't as important as the sheer limit of the architecture.

    8. Re:Why? by RV.eq.VFG · · Score: 1

      Why
      Why Not?

      What possible use can this serve?
      Non

      Wasting hundreds of watts
      True, you do not want everyone to do it.

    9. Re:Why? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Resistivity of the FETs is roughly proportional to absolute temperature, so the RC time constant is proportional absolute temperature. If it weren't for speed-of-light delays, -100c should be about 36% faster than 0c. Lower temperature, by easing heat problems on the chip, may allow higher voltages (limited by breakdown problems) which also allow the chip to go faster.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    10. Re:Why? by Decameron81 · · Score: 1

      And this is the reason why in my opinion the future of computing is not so much in raw CPU speed as it is in the ammount of CPUs one will have.

      A 1 Ghz CPU is nearly 5 million times faster than the clock speed of a neuron, but the human brain has nearly 100 billion brain cells, which makes it "faster" overall. What faster means is debatable but keep in mind that the brain is what let's you move your body, see, hear, listen, feel, think, identify, remember.

      So imagine what we could do with incredibly big arrays of modern CPUs on our home PCs. And it will only become easier to achieve this goal as CPUs get smaller with new technologies. Take the nano-processors as an example.

      I certainly look forward to the day when having several (maybe thousands) CPUs in our desktop computers will be quite normal.

      Diego Rey

      --
      diegoT
    11. Re:Why? by pdp11e · · Score: 1

      ..and that neglects the fact that electrons move slower than light.

      A little nitpick: Drift velocity of electrons is slower then light by several orders of magnitude. In fact, even if the processor were clocked at say 100 kHz, electrons starting from one opening gate never reach adjacent gate during one cycle. On the other hand, voltage propagates at the speed that corresponds to the group velocity of light for given medium.

      This is just what it says: a nitpick. Your original analysis is dead on center.

    12. Re:Why? by DougMackensie · · Score: 1

      At -100C you could probably keep your 3GHz PC up at around the 14GHz area
      I take it you didn't read the article. The finns got a 2 ghz thunderbird to 3 ghz, and their 3.2 ghz p4 up to 4.4 ghz.

      no where NEAR 14 ghz.

    13. Re:Why? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      One can just buy a dual Athlon MP, dual Xeon or even Opteron and have it work stably and without trouble. It is amusing to play with all this but I'd say there is a diminishing return where things are pointlessly overkill.

      I'm not sure what the point of going so frigid as most life, power and frequency derating curves start at 25 degrees C. Temperatures below that usually get little benefit of going higher because of limits other than temperature.

    14. Re:Why? by barawn · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can bet that Intel's designers didn't anticipate those kinds of timing issues.

      Actually, just to nitpick: they did.

      There are two (maybe three? I can't remember off the top of my head) pipeline stages in the P4 which are "drive" stages - stages where the pipeline does nothing except wait for data to travel from one side of the chip to another.

      It was part of Intel's design to allow the clockspeed of the chips to reach ~ 10 GHz.

      Now, that being said, that's the fundamental design, not the current design. Almost definitely a modern chip can't run even twice as fast as its rated clock speed. The chance of the margins being that large are just zero.

    15. Re:Why? by ivern76 · · Score: 1

      Because it's a cool hack, and that's really all it takes for someone to do it.

    16. Re:Why? by questamor · · Score: 1

      It doesn't even seem "cool" at this point (beyond the obvious pun). Wasting hundreds of watts, taking up way too much room (extra-large form-factor, anyone?), needing a fork-lift to move it... How does any of that benefit the PC or user?

      Some things have an upper limit to what still constitutes "bigger/better/faster/harder". This definitely crosses that line with regard to chip cooling techniques.


      It's the fun of it - not just because anyone can go grab a refrigerator, pay for the price of running it, and get something like this done. But if you have a good grasp of engineering cooling systems, and a clue about how a PC works, hey why not combine the two. Two hobbies in one, twice the geekness.

      I guess it's a bit like when the first D&D guy also became a computer guy and made the first RPG.

    17. Re:Why? by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And this limitation is why in the future, all computers will have multiple processors. Think about it- your computer ALREADY DOES! It has a CPU, several controllers and a Graphics processor. Your sound card has a microprocessor, and your various port controllers all do some work as well. Some of the work in the future will have to be subdivided. We'll have speech synthesis on our audio boards, and full raytracing on the video card. Maybe one processor will handle user input such as speech recognition. I don't think one single processor is going to get much faster than 8GHz anytime soon. They're already having serious trouble getting incremental speed increases to make a serious difference in useable processing.

    18. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The really sad thing is that programmers don't seem to like threads, but they're going to have to learn to like them if we're all using SMP machines. Presumably SMP will take off sometime around 4GHz, because then you approach the frequencies used in Microwave ovens. Yes, it is possible to use shielding, but the shielding will heat up, and heat is already a major problem. Of course, if we came up with some method to decrease the power consumption of CPUs significantly that would also solve this problem, but since power consumption has gone down only slightly recently, and typically goes up, I don't see this happening.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:Why? by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1

      As well, quantum tunneling becomes a major issue, but this isn't as important as the sheer limit of the architecture. How so? I thought that since they were operating above the quantum level, that its efefct on them would be so minimal it wouldnt matter much at all? Or would absolute zero even change they way the strings (see Herefor more information on String Theory) behave?

    20. Re:Why? by Ion+Berkley · · Score: 1

      Its not an issue of Intel having not "designed" for 10GHz operation, this idea that clock speeds can be dramticaly increased at drasticly reduced temeratures fails on two simple counts:
      1) Material science. The transistor operating speed and signal propagations just don't scale so dramaticly due to temperature. If I run an analysis of a chip at say a temperature of 0C and again at 70C (typical operating temperature range for a commercial use chip) then I will see something like a difference of 20% in the max clock speed.
      2) Non-Linearity of operation. Different signal paths will change there propagation delays differently for a given change in temperature. Eventually the circuit will just not work correctly, typically for low temperature due to a so called race or short path error. If the (die) junction temperature was sucessfully reduced to the kind of temperatures that spawned this discussion then the chances of correct operation would frankly be very slim. I would guess that even in this case there is still a very steep temperature gradient within the package and that the die is operating at a far higher temperature than people understand.

      Its hard in such limited space to explain just to what lengths (we) chip designers go to model the operation of our designs, but suffice to say ultimately we model the propagation of signal transitions across a device to a degree of detail that would utterly amaze (and baffle) most people who consider them selves very tech savy. Hand on heart, I can honnestly admit that even though I have designed more chips than I have fingers and toes, that I would be fairly clueless at this point to explain the physics that the software tools that I use model. The crux of chip design has always been management of overwhelming complexity, and computation and design tools never get any closer to overtaking the designs we work on as ever year we hit the next set of atomic physical effects with a chip 4x more complex than last years. Put simply we don't set out to design chips that work under conditions we don't care about, we do every thing we can to simplfy our job and that includes(In Intels case) deciding a very precise operating voltage and temperature range for the correct operation of there microprocessors otherwise the design task would become intractably complex.
      As some other posters have noted the true panacea of such low temperatures is the possibilty of the use of super conducting materials, however at least for IC's that still belongs in the realm of esoteric research.

    21. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm.

      Microwaves only run ~2.4 Ghz. Thats the resonant frequency of water.

    22. Re:Why? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's an excellent point. As a physicist, I should have been more precise. It's a nitpick, but it's a good nitpick. :)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    23. Re:Why? by volpe · · Score: 1


      and that neglects the fact that electrons move slower than light.

      It's not the speed of the electrons that matters. Electron drift speed within a typical electric circuit is actually pretty slow (on the order of inches per second, though I don't know what it calculates out to be for cpu-scale circuits). What matters is the rate at which changes in the electric field propagate within the wire, which, as you correctly point out, is a little slower than c.

    24. Re:Why? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      ...fails on two simple counts:

      1) Material science....

      2) Non-Linearity of operation....

      Spot on! In my post I just wanted to address the issue of absurd overclocking from the standpoint of an inability to propagate information across the chip that quickly. (Not to say that this renders those clock speeds impossible; it just wouldn't work if the chip isn't designed for it.) It seemed the simplest way to explain why it wasn't possible to have a 15 GHz P4.

      I'm glad you brought up the materials science issues, which (I agree with you) are the limits you smack into first in this problem. My undergrad solid state physics courses have receded into merciful oblivion--and it's nice to hear from someone who does this for a living.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    25. Re:Why? by Technician · · Score: 1

      I thought temprature was related to atom and molecular movement, not electron spin. Somehow I get the idea if in fact electron spin quit, the material would collapse in on itself and you would start to generate a black hole. I've not seen any evidence atoms loose their spin, or the ability to carry electrons from one atom to another in a conductor. I think there is strong evidence the electrons are still very mobile near absolute zero. The fact most superconductors operate near this temprature and they don't collapse into super dense material tends to support the idea atoms keep their electron shells near regular orbits while cooled to near absolute zero.

      Did I miss anything, or am I on the right thought.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    26. Re:Why? by syukton · · Score: 1

      Which is the precise reason why we need to abandon two-dimensional chip design and move up to three-dimensional design. Instead of a signal having to go across the entire chip 2.1cm, it can just go directly up (or directly down) .01mm, and the signal is where it needs to be. I've often wondered why this isn't done already, and I'm pretty sure it's because of the cooling factor; layering CPU dies together is one hell of a way to create a heat trap. But when you're running at -100C .....

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    27. Re:Why? by troon · · Score: 1

      Wait a couple of weeks, and you'll be able to buy the CPU that does the same job without the rack of noisy fridge.

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    28. Re:Why? by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Ladies and gentlemen, give this man a prize.

      I think he just discovered how we as a species will extend Moore's Law to continue to be accurate once we start running up against insurmountable barriers in the "smaller, faster, better" arena...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    29. Re:Why? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of the Atari Transputer box that didn't really make it, about 20 years ago. Apparently they had one at Comdex, or some similar show, and it was running a flight simulator. Multiple transputers in one box, running displays and joysticks. The way it was reported, up to four people could dogfight in real time, with no discernible lag in image updating.

      Of course, these days a single CPU box has more power than that Atari, but in its day it looked like the Next Big Thing(tm). Probably what killed it was not adopting MS-DOS - it ran Helios, an honest-to-god SMP OS in a desktop box, when the world was just discovering the joys of running Windows2.x on the 80386...

    30. Re:Why? by lafiel · · Score: 1

      Electron spin being 0 is theoretically impossible. However, superconductivity allows for this because pairs of electrons with opposite spins act as the same particle (The Cooper-Pair). This means the pair seems to have the same wave function et al, but the differing spins cancel so from the casual viewer, and in fact to anything the pair affects, it's zero spin.

    31. Re:Why? by lafiel · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I'm not too up to date with String Theory, but I'll expand on what I meant... and perhaps you can detail why my thinking would be wrong. At near light speed, the wave function of the electrons would begin to detail just probabilities with very little control over actual positioning (we know its near exact speed, so positioning is near impossible to tell). Because of this, the so-called "tunnelling effect" would allow for electron flow where there should be none. This would massively screw up the chip design if electrons start flowing where they shouldn't. Superconductivity allows for hundreds (actually, far more than that...) of the same wave function, if 'one' Cooper-pair's probability of tunneling reaches 1, then every pair will tunnel that way as well. And now you have new paths through the CPU.

    32. Re:Why? by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      If one corner of the chip needs to talk to the other corner of the chip, it will take a minimum of two clock cycles just for the signal to travel there and back--and that neglects the fact that electrons move slower than light.
      The electrons in a circuit typically only drift at speeds of centimeters per second. The signal propagates at a speed that is much greater than the drift speed of the electrons, and on the same order of magnitude as the speed of light. The signal is in the electromagnetic fields, not the electrons.

    33. Re:Why? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      "I've often wondered why this isn't done already, and I'm pretty sure it's because of the cooling factor;"

      I work at a semiconductor company, and the main reason is complexity/cost. It already takes a long time and a lot of processing to do one layer of transistors with all their interconnects, routing, etc. If we were to try to make another set of transistors above that and the vertical connections to it, the cost of the chips would go up quite a bit--probably a lot more than the smaller chip size could offset. Simplicity is our friend, and we would rather try to shrink our process technology than add complexity.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  27. Practical Use by fmlug.org · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So is this just for fun or is there some sort of practical use for super cooling your proc. I mean its cool and all but really who could actually afford to use a system like this in real life. I mean you cant be telling me that the amount of cycles gained by super cooling the proc can offset the amount spent to keep the proc cool. I didn't get to finish the article cuz it took about 2.3 seconds to /. the site, good work on that by the way. All I am asking is can someone explain the practical use for all this is there is one.

    1. Re:Practical Use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean its cool and all but...

      Actually, I believe the technical term is "really fucking cold".

  28. What about cracking? by atrader42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems all well and good while the machine is running. What happens when you boot it up or shut it down, though? In the summer, you could be dropping or increasing 130 degrees C. Even if the cooler can normally regulate this, what happens if the machine loses power? (no, I couldn't rtfa, it's slashdotted)

    1. Re:What about cracking? by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      Simple, use a large heatsink. You wouldn't want to make the heatsink radiate heat well without the coolant flowing through it, so the temp should go up to room temperature nice and slow when it's turned off. As for turning it on, I doubt it would be very hard to regulate the rate at which it cools down.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    2. Re:What about cracking? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I think they were asking what happens when the machine goes off and the cooler is still on...

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  29. Re:minimum temperature by frdmfghtr · · Score: 5, Informative

    when you have an accident with liquid nitrogen you lose a finger. when you have an accident with liquid helium, you lose parts of the neighborhood.

    You're thinking of liquid hydrogen, not helium. Liquid helium is damn cold, yes, but it won't explode.

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  30. Re:minimum temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when you have an accident with liquid helium, you lose parts of the neighborhood.

    Why?

  31. something y'all don't think about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All processors that come off the production line needs to be _tested_ before shipped off to the customers - this includes die probing (no way in hell you'll find a heatsink there), and then final test after packaging.

    ever wonder how they cool them chips during the final test phase, WITHOUT a heatsink?

    fyi, major semiconductor manufactures do license some exotic cooling techniques for this phase of their process, because designing handlers that will slap on heatsinks (applying thermal compound and all that silliness) is simply not economical - besides you don't get to test your processor at different temperatures, which in a necessary requirement that the processor don't fail after sitting in a case that has all its airways blocked by dust for two years.

    Posted anon for obvious reasons.

    1. Re:something y'all don't think about by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Obvious reasons? Because you don't have anything to cite to support your comment? I have an Athlon XP 1700+ overclocked to 1.66GHz (PR2000+) using a heat sink with one of those thermal transfer stickers on it, no paste whatsoever. By adding a thermistor and a peltier junction one can vary temperature. Problem solved.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:something y'all don't think about by tho+1234 · · Score: 1

      There's a huge difference between installing a heatsink once and doing it millions of times on an industrial scale. As an owner of an athlon with no heatspeader, i'm sure you understand how delicate the die on the chip is, and designing a robotic system to gently install heatsinks, clip them down, run the test, and remove the heatsink thousands of times a second will probably cost more than a fancy cooling system.

      What range of temperatures can you obtain with a peltier junction crudely connected to a heatsink? Most chips are rated for operation from 0c to 100c, and certainly need to be tested far beyond this range to predict reliability or to speed bin/grade the parts.

      And even if the temperature range could be achieved, waiting for the temperature change at the peltier end of the heat sink to conduct through the heatsink and affect the core temperature means waiting for an extremely long period of time. IF this slows down the testing process, that loss in productivity would cost far more than the cost of an advanced cooling system.

      The parent's post makes a lot of sense, and i don't see any reason for your attack....

    3. Re:something y'all don't think about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And even if the temperature range could be achieved, waiting for the temperature change at the peltier end of the heat sink to conduct through the heatsink ..."

      Ermm.. you're sticking the peltier on the wrong side of the heatsink, apparently.

    4. Re:something y'all don't think about by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Peltier junctions don't go on the outside of the heat sink. They go in between the heat sink and the CPU. The heat sink is just there to improve the efficiency of the peltier cooler; Without the heat sink, there's nowhere to pump the heat TO, as the hot side of the peltier cooler will just stay hot.

      As for crudely attached, I don't think they would attach it crudely. That's goofy.

      You wouldn't clip anything down, either. Robots (as in, just one arm, but complete and ready for computer control) are readily available with pressure sensors in them for industrial applications, so you know how hard you are pressing on the chip. The heat sink gets picked up by the arm using "soft jaws" - I'm not sure what they're called in robotics/industrial automation but in machining, when you want to hold a part to be machined, you can take some aluminum bars and put them in a vise, then machine them to hold your parts. So the jaws will be custom-designed to hold the part, a perfect fit every time. It is, if not trivial, at least readily solvable to make it make electrical connections at the same time, for operation of the peltier junction, and reading data back for sensing temperature. Personally I would design a small circuit to handle the latter, using some sort of microcontroller, and have it communicate back via a serial interface (RS-232 or -422 depending on electrical conditions in the lab, not necessarily at 12 volts) to avoid drift due to connector oxidization. This is only going to add a dollar or so to your parts cost.

      Eventually the thermal transfer sticker on the bottom of your cooling/measurement unit (the junction itself will be held to a lapped heat sink surface using thermal grease, and a "shim" of material will be on the bottom of it to sandwich it down) will wear out, which is what makes it necessary to support rapid replacement of the heat sink units. Just as a CNC mill can detect torque and automatically change cooling when it is worn past the point of usefulness, a reference heat source can be used to calibrate your CMU (my new abbreviation for cooling/measurement unit - like it?) and determine when the sticker is done. A new unit can be swapped in, and the old one can be rotated out for replacement of the sticker, possibly with re-lapping of the old surface. If a "shim" is used to hold in the peltier junction, then that shim is the only disposable part, and a little sliver of some aluminum alloyed specifically for heat transfer will be an extremely inexpensive part. If it is designed with replacement in mind, the labor will also be inexpensive.

      The most expensive part of this, including R&D, is going to be the robotic arms. However they are commodity items at this point. Now, I am not including the cost of administrative overhead, all the meetings which will be held on the subject and so on; That will probably cost, in turn, more than the robots, and be a much more painful process for all involved, except the managers, who seem to love 'em.

      If you use a stacked array of peltier junctions, you can achieve fairly extreme temperatures. Just three or four stacked junctions will drop well below freezing, and frost will form rapidly on the coldest surface in an environment of average humidity. Peltier junctions have high current requirements but do not involve intense load, so stacking them is by far the most efficient way to go, and will let you achieve more rapid changes in temperature as well as greater extremes of temperature.

      The only thing I'm not sure about is how well they generate heat, I only know that they can be used to do so. I suspect you would end up with two jigs; One with peltier a junction(s) to accelerate heat transfer, and a heating element; and the other as I have described above.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:something y'all don't think about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blah blah blah.

      You speak like a true armchair engineer.

      "post anon for obvious reasons" is that I am telling you how some large semiconductor companies - generally ones that produced chips with a high power density - test their chips: no, they don't use robotic heatsink attachers / removers; those would be terribly prone to failure with so many mechanical parts, slow, and extremely expensive - without precise control of temperature experienced on the chips.

      The things you are looking for are called "handlers," and maybe you should consider doing a search on them sometimes before theorizing how the industry can save money by silly ideas (or, by all means, patent your idea and see how far it goes!).

      Overclocking a few chips does not make you any more insightful about industrial applications; it only makes you sound naive about what you are talking about. (Call this Ad Hominem all you want, it does not change the fact that your idea is impractical for an industrial process)

    6. Re:something y'all don't think about by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Certainly the system I describe would not work for dramatic numbers of chips. You will need something simpler for high reliability, more like the machines used to punch steel than a robotic arm. You don't need that kind of range of motion. You're right that I didn't think my post through all that well though. I was caught up in the moment :) However, anything which is able to respond to a changing environment by altering its own physical motions is robotic, so while my particular design might be less than ideal, the concepts are, for the most part, reasonable.

      I don't think I shared anything worth patenting; Every bit of that idea is obvious. Of course, that doesn't stop plenty of companies, but the very fact that it's obvious is enough to indicate that it could be done better. After all, lots of people smarter than me have been working on this very problem, I am sure.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  32. Cool by 9mm+Censor · · Score: 1

    Thats so cool (pun intended).

    1. Re:Cool by MooCows · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I could've spent days looking for the pun.

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
  33. Guess 'optimal' isn't as absolute as it seems by MattGWU · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In my book, 'optimal PC performance' involves consistant operation over a long period of time. This ignores the fact that the processor may be capable of more speed because of the nature of MHz ratings, but in the long run, this is 'optimal'.

    This is interesting, and impressive, and admirable as an engineering exercise, but not exactly in persuit of mainstream 'optimal' performance characteristics. (Unless I RTFA and find that the processor does indeed last a good long time, and not burn bright and die out as I imagine it to under these conditions).

    Maybe I'm just old fashioned.

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  34. Re:Someday by Excen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think you could do that. Liquid nitrogen is diamagnetic, meaning it is slightly affected by magnetic fields. In other words, the coolant could possibly conduct enough electricity to cause damage the hardware.

    --
    "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
  35. and to think what that money would have bought... by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Cascade cooling is yet another chapter in a Finnish overclocker's neverending quest for optimal PC performance

    I don't suppose he considered, oh, say, a dual/quad xeon/amd-64?

    AMD 64 bit dual rackmount boxes are about $2.5k these days with low-end disk, and they'd probably kick the crap out of whatever he's got.

    Or he could go for some really big iron.

    I personally can't wait until he gets his electric bill- refrigeration units are VERY power hungry.

  36. it's good to know by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    someone will be able to play doom 3 on doomsday

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  37. Why Not? by SkArcher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets face it, there are far more destructive ways to waste money than by attempting to make the fastest Home PC on the Planet.

    Why climb the mountain? Because it is there.

    Doing it just for the sake of having done it is enough, if that is what you want to do.

    --

    An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
  38. Forget cold feet... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Informative

    Summary: Four (4) compressors cooling one PC! Yes its big, yes its heavy, yes its loud and YES IT DOES GET YOUR CPU AND GPU COLD - VERY COLD - EVEN DAMN COLD! Is -100C cold enough for you?

    Forget the cold feet, it's going deaf from the noise all that cooling generates that is your real problem. What's the point of having a PC that's so loud that you need to wear ear mufflers to be able to use it or else risk losing your hearing?

    Being able to hear yourself think while you work or hear the in-game audio while you play is a good thing.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Forget cold feet... by FosterKanig · · Score: 1

      Couldn't he just buy another computer?

    2. Re:Forget cold feet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, since the compressors would be pumping out heat, it would more likely cook your feet to a nice crisp state...

    3. Re:Forget cold feet... by MentholMoose · · Score: 1

      Because he finds it fun? You know, like a hobby? macci is a bencher and this dual cascade is a benching system, so having audio at all is irrelevant.

  39. Re:minimum temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    helium is a noble gas. that means is is inert fool.

  40. Re:minimum temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Parts of the neighborhood will absorb the helium and float away into the sky.

  41. Re:minimum temperature by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    no, no, liquid plutonium is far deadlier

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  42. Re:minimum temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can pour liquid nitrogen on someone and it will do them no harm. It evaporates that fast.

    don't try this with Liquid Oxygen however...

  43. To put it another way: by MrEd · · Score: 2, Funny
    You keep using that word... optimal. I do not think it means what you think it means.


    (with apologies to Inigo Montoya)

    --

    Wah!

    1. Re:To put it another way: by MikeCapone · · Score: 2, Funny

      you keep using that word... optimal. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      (with apologies to Inigo Montoya)


      -Have you ever heard of Aristotle, Socrates, Plato?

      -Yes.

      -Morons!

    2. Re:To put it another way: by thebig_j · · Score: 1

      -I do not mean to pry, but you don't by any chance happen to have six fingers on your right hand?

      -Do you always begin conversations this way?

    3. Re:To put it another way: by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      -You killed my love!

      -It's possible. I kill lots of people.

      [...]

      -Life is pain, highness. Anybody who says different is selling something.

  44. okay, so how fast is it? by imaginate · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's cold, fast, and heavy, and I'm sure there were pretty pictures, but could someone who actually got to the article mention how fast he got the thing going?

    Thanks.

    1. Re:okay, so how fast is it? by SteakandcheeseUm · · Score: 1

      He doesnt want to break it before he can show it off! blargh

    2. Re:okay, so how fast is it? by Wingnut64 · · Score: 1

      I belive he also got an extra 2 Ghz on an XP3200+ (just going by memory tho, the site is dead now)

      --
      echo 'Header append X-HD-DVD "0x09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0"' >> /etc/apache2/httpd.conf
  45. Re:minimum temperature by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful
    with these loonys getting their temps down so low, i wonder what the limit is. i believe at around -200 the silicon seperates from the housing, destroying the chip.

    I can't remember how low we went with the Transputers but they ran damn fast dunked in liquid helium. The processors did not reach the level of the helium because it was constantly evaporating.

    The limit to overclocking is highly processor dependent. Some designs will simply end up in a race condition because some parts of the chip will work much faster than others and you end up missing the right edge of a pulse. Basically you give yourself a whole new region to discover timing errors in the design.

    I don't think that the physical process is going to be a fixed limit, clearly this will be very dependent on the physical packaging. Chips are sent into space to face some pretty unpleasant temperature ranges.

    Depending on your material there is a point when your band gap goes all wonky and things start breaking down. Most times what you are worried about is the effect in the high temperature region, but there are equally wierd things in the low temperature region.

    This is definitely not something that is recommended for most applications. There are a couple of oddball ones, like cryptanalysis where it is really hard to get a result but once you get one it is trivial to check. I would not be surprised if GCHQ has a swimingpool sized machine for brute force key cracking dunked in some type of cooling liquid. The NSA would just chuck money at the problem.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  46. Re:minimum temperature by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
    You can pour liquid nitrogen on someone's bare skin and not hurt them.


    I dare you to try pouring some of it on your jeans (while wearing them ;).

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  47. Money making side usage... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    And when you're done overclocking for the day, you can line up the old women in the neighborhood and freeze off their old warts for a modest sum. And they said military gear had dual-uses!

    1. Re:Money making side usage... by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
      I was in an experimental physics lab at RPI one afternoon. My friend had a wart on his hand. We had a styrofoam cup of liqiud Nitrogen...


      The wart came off. My friend was not hurt.


      His mother was NOT amused.

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  48. Re:minimum temperature by nchrist13 · · Score: 1

    liquid nitrogen is extremely cold, but you can stick your finger in it, or pour it on yourself, etc. i have done this in various physics labs. the idea is that it boils at such a low temp that it wont be able to freeze to your body, or let alone touch it, because your body heat is warm enough to boil it quick enough that there will always be a layer of N2 gas around your skin. so your finger will feel a bit cold, (actually warmer than it would if you put it on a block of ice) but you will definately not lose any part of it. i also had a physics prof who would swallow a piece of dry ice and burp up the smoke-looking gas.

  49. Stage 1 is -40C by karlandtanya · · Score: 2, Funny

    But what is that in F?

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    1. Re:Stage 1 is -40C by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      -40C = -40F

      Its where the two scales meet.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    2. Re:Stage 1 is -40C by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

      YHBT YHL HAND

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  50. PC - Outside by molafson · · Score: 1

    The temperature around here will go down to -30 centigrade during the winter. This being the case, can I achieve significant performance gains by putting my PC outside? I can access it over my 802.11b network. How fast do you think I can overclock my 1.0 GHz Celeron at these temperatures?

    1. Re:PC - Outside by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      You may have trouble with mechanical things like hard drives and fans.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:PC - Outside by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I would be concerned about things like the hard drives not wanting to spin up. Resistance goes down with temperature, so it could affect your power supply's voltages too. I don't know if it would be such a great idea. Not to mention it would be a bitch to have to go outside to burn a CD.

      I have always wanted to put an old Pentium outside in a Minnesota winter for a while just to see what would happen, but never got around to it. I suspect that if you left the computer on all the time, many components like the disk drives would be okay as they would stay warm enough, but I could be wrong.

  51. Enthusiast Market by JackpotMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Simple, they are enthusiasts and love what they do. Sure they could go buy a faster cpu for the money they spent on doing it, but the idea when you goto such extreme cooling isnt enlarging your "e-peen" it's pushing the envelope to the next level.

    Example: A rig with a barton 2500 (pre the multiplier locking bs AMD pulled) comes stock at 1.83 ghz.. with a good hsf you could probably get 2.5ghz but not much more than that becuase the power you need to pump into it, if you can get that processor running at -c you can push it way beyond 2.5ghz maybe even 4-5ghz range (barton 2500 was a very nice stepping core, almost as good as the tbred B 1700 JUIHB) now sure, I spend 89 on a new 2500 + the money I spent on a new watercooling and peltier I could have gotten a much better proc and went air cooling, but the joy of overclocking, pushing the envelope is what drove my decision. Someone who buys a high-end retail processor and uses that stock POS hsf would never know the acomplishment I would feel seeing that 3.5ghz mark outa a $90 Processor. Also realize that the cheap processor and the cooling rig is a one time fee, if another sweet processor (high scalability) comes out cheap I can just grab that new one and stick it in my rig and boom, another huge OC for me and the satisfaction of it aswell.

    --
    ______ Eagles may fly but monkeys don't get sucked into jet engines.
    1. Re:Enthusiast Market by bonehead · · Score: 1

      "the joy of overclocking"? That's what makes this all worthwhile?

      Now, I could understand spending 50 grand to build a kit car that replicates the appearance (and perhaps even exceeds the performance) of a Lamborghini Countach. Hell, even if the project cost a hundred grand, you'd save money in the deal, and have the pride of accomplishment to go along with it.

      What you describe sounds more to me like spending $50 grand to build a kit car that replicates the appearance and performance of a '71 Pinto.

  52. idle in WinXP desktop it would drop down to -92C. by CmdrTostado · · Score: 1

    Prefect testing conditions, for a Windows(*) box !!

    (*) windows may or may not be a registered trademark of a certain software company, depending on the results of current litigation.

  53. must be cold where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even your letters are shivering

  54. 4.4 ghz by filtersweep · · Score: 1

    for a 3 ghz processor... It would have sounded so much better back in the day if he pulled 350 mhz out of a 200 mhz processor? The photos weren't THAT pretty...

    --


    Those that suggest you "dance like no one is watching" really want to see you make a complete fool of yourself.
  55. Lifes Good by highwaytohell · · Score: 1

    maybe when this can be used to replace my LG internet fridge i'll get some cold beer

  56. 4.4 ghz by cmacmanus · · Score: 2, Informative

    So, he was able to obtain somewhere around 4.4 GHZ on a 3GHZ Pentium setup, with XP to boot [blegh]. Not bad, but give me a year and I'll have the same thing at not such an inane temp. and size. Admirable project, nonetheless.

  57. He's dead Jim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Slashdot effect strikes again! Dang, and I wanted to see the article too :(

  58. Re:minimum temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer liquid antimatter.

  59. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative


    Summary: Four (4) compressors cooling one PC! Yes its big, yes its heavy, yes its loud and YES IT DOES GET YOUR CPU AND GPU COLD - VERY COLD - EVEN DAMN COLD! Is -100C cold enough for you?

    Intro

    If you are an overclocker you know that keeping things cool is the key for big clockspeeds. The cooler that comes with the CPU ain't going to get you very far. It must be replaced with better cooling if you want to get really high clocks out of your hardware. But what is good enough? Even the biggest and baddest heatsinks won't get your temps much colder - in other words they wont give you much extra in terms of MHz. Watercooling is a nice option cos it has huge cooling capacity but does it really give you a big gain in CPU speed? Usually no because it can't get colder than the air cooling the water. So what can you do if you really need to get more speed out of your system??

    Vaporphase cooling is the answer here. Vaporphase cooling is what keeps your freezer and ice cream cold. Vaporphase cooling is what 'all the xtreme-overclockers' are using nowadays. Several people have noticed that going from +40C to -40C makes quite a difference in CPU overclocking potential (talking about 200-600MHz here). There are even commercial solutions that go all the way down to -40C and even a bit colder. If you feel that you must get one of these just go to nVentiv website, check who is your local reseller and get one

    But what if you are a real speedfreak and -40C ain't cold enough for you?? Well there is always dryice (-79C) or Liquid Nitrogen (-196C) or even liquid Helium (-268.6 C) for you but the problem is that its not really possible to get constant CPU cooling with these. LN2 and helium are actually too cold for your little CPU - it just wont operate properly at such low temps.

    But you know those low-temp freezers they use in labs? Those that go down to like -80..-100C and can maintain the temperature. Good temps for CPU cooling eh?
    These are cascade vaporphase coolers. They are called cascades because of multiple cooling stages (normally two). First stage uses 'normal' refrigerant like R404 or R507 and cools down to around -40C. The second stage uses a special low temp refrigerant like R23 or SUVA95 or R1150 and can get the temperature down to -100C level. The first stage evaporator is cooling down the condenser of the 2nd stage - this makes it possible to use a refrigerant with very low boiling point in the 2nd stage. Normal cascade design uses two compressors - one per stage. This also means that it is not a very compact cooler.

    Here is a picture of such a freezer (the door has been ripped off):

    Cascade cooling is yet another chapter in my neverending quest for optimal PC performance. I've tried quite a few cooling solutions already (waterchillers, peltiers, R404 vaporphase, dryice, ln2 etc.) but cascade vaporphase was something new to me.
    This time I was lucky enough to locate not only one but TWO cryofreezers - both were supposed to be broken - so I got them for free.
    The first one (the one in the picture on page 1) had problems with the system fan and because of that the owners decided to send it to the junkyard. True, there really was a problem with the fan. It didn't blow any air at all - but then again no power was coming to the fan powerconnector. I made external power input for the fan and it started to work nicely. With the freezer door closed it would get the inside temp down to -91C.
    Obviously it would do nothing for PC cooling in its original form so I had to convert it to a CPU cooler.

    Testing cascade stage 1 - its charged with R404 refrigerant and it went down to -40C.

    2nd stage parts installed - CPU cooler is ready for a test run.

    Its working! First test run got it down to almost -100C with no heatload. Pretty good with R23 refrigerant (boiling point @1bar = -82C).

    Here is a picture of the evaporator installed on P4 motherboard. I was using a 3GHz P4 CPU here and it would clock to around 3.6-3.7GHz with good heatsink. W

  60. -0c smaller than +0c? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the difference between -0c, +0c, and 0c? Is it "d"?

  61. they need to put those coolers on their webserver by shaark78 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    those servers are getting hot by that slashdotting. time for those dual-cascade coolers!

  62. Space/time/money by stienman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For all those wailing "Like, WTF?" and "This isn't worth it!" I'll say this once:

    Well duh. Do you think we don't understand the value of time, space, and money and can't do an investment/return calculation?

    This is cool because they can do it. It's on Slashdot because lots of us think it's nifty to turn a 2.2GHz processor into a 4+GHz processor.

    Yes, it does cost more, take more space, and more time to set up than two 3GHz machines, or even a dual processor 3GHz.

    But it's like my high school instructor telling me 10 years ago that making a microcontroller controlled light dimmer is non-trivial. I did it then, and it requires fewer than 25 lines of assembly code on a simple microcontoller. Was I geeked when I finished? You bet.

    People are constantly trying to break records, and this is no exception. The higher the record is set, the more effort and resources must be put in to beat it.

    -Adam

    Why is it becoming harder to post on slashdot? 4/5 of the time I get an incomplete page when I press submit or preview.

    1. Re:Space/time/money by highwaytohell · · Score: 1

      thats the whole point behind R&D isnt it? push the boundaries to see how far you can go. If everyone thought the way of "who cares, no one needs this", we'd all still be scribbling gibberish on paper.

    2. Re:Space/time/money by BOFHelsinki · · Score: 0

      we'd all still be scribbling gibberish on paper

      Yes, now the content e.g. on /. is vastly better!

  63. Re:minimum temperature by MikeXpop · · Score: 1
    "when you have an accident with liquid nitrogen you lose a finger."
    Or it leaks, and one CC of N2 displaces 8 litres of air, and you die.
    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  64. Re:minimum temperature by McAddress · · Score: 4, Funny

    how about liquid mercury. oh never mind.

  65. Re:they need to put those coolers on their webserv by potpie · · Score: 1

    darn! I was going to make the obvious relation of the slashdot effect to the performance boosting.... but you beat me to it. You're right though- they may get optimal CPU performance, but not even that can withstand the

    SlashDotEffect!
    *cue the cool music!*

    --
    Esoteric reference.
  66. Already been done (sort of) by G27+Radio · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm not sure it will ever end...

    Check out this this Slashdot story about a motherboard submerged in liquid nitrogen cooled flourinert.

    1. Re:Already been done (sort of) by G27+Radio · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own post, but the link in that Slashdot story is outdated. Click here for a link to pictures and video.

  67. But what about the other components? by lurker412 · · Score: 1

    The manufacturer specs on my machine clearly indicate a minimum operating temperature of 0 degrees C. IAMNAHG (I am not a hardware guy), but the CPU is only one part of a computer system, and it won't do much good to overclock the CPU if another vital system component freezes to death.

    1. Re:But what about the other components? by Teknon · · Score: 0

      That is why he didn't jus put the computer in ther frezer - Instead, he set up the system to just cool the CPU and the GPU. Granted, anything that cold will affect the ambient temperature in the computer, but then didn't have it in a case, so the cool will disapate faster.

  68. Mirror by evn · · Score: 5, Informative
    The site is a little slow so I've mirrored the low resolution (~640x480) images and text right here

    Go easy on her, it's on my ISPs web space. Wait a minute, I'm still upset about not have truely unlimited access so on second thought: bag on it! ;)

    1. Re:Mirror by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      We really should have a (Score 10, Functioning Mirror) moderation for posts as informative | mirrored as yours is here.

    2. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the real site just went down while i was browsing, but your mirror is blazing fast. thanks :)

  69. U r so stupids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, 3y3 managed to get my 286 working @ 52.491GHz thanks 2 supercooling. WTF r u on ab0ut? Ch1p5 don't run on l1te!!

  70. All that cooling by PeterHammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    and they still can't wring out enough power to avoid being slashdotted...

  71. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's up with all the bad moderation tonight?

  72. Re:Someday by T9D · · Score: 2, Informative

    > Liquid nitrogen is diamagnetic, meaning it is slightly affected by magnetic fields. In other words, the coolant could possibly conduct enough electricity to cause damage the hardware. This is not true. That it is diamagnetic means it slightly repels magnetic fields. This has no impact on its electrical conductivity.

  73. Reminds me.. by skebe · · Score: 0

    I can't find the link but I recall something about two Russian guys placing a 386 mobo in their icebox/freezer, next to the vodka*, in order to overclock it to play Quake 3.

    Or something like that.

    * pronounced "wood-ka"

    1. Re:Reminds me.. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Nope, it was a bunch of Brits with a 486SX-25, a Voodoo, and tons of alcohol (including vodka). They got it up to 247MHz, before it Athloned (non-XP, and this isn't from the project site, it's THG's thermal test of the P3-1.0, the Ath-1.4, the AthMP-1.2, and a P4 (I forgot the clock)).

      Anyway, http://totl.net/Eunuch/index.html is the project.

    2. Re:Reminds me.. by skebe · · Score: 0

      Heh I hadn't seen that one! But the one I am remembering actually showed the freezer, with the vodka in it, with about one to two inches of ice/frost sitting just above the mobo.
      They had their monitor in the fridge I believe also.

      But this was great to read. Thanks!

  74. Well, it worked. Kinda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their server is cold now.

    Dead cold.

  75. /. effect by lastberserker · · Score: 1

    Alas, mates, looks like we burned it :-(((

    --
    My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
  76. Freezer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't use my freezer a whole lot except for ice, So, I made a partition in it and fit a miniitx into approximately half of the freezer box (the network cable comes out of a hole in the freezer lid). Nothing fancy there, I did it just so the whole thing can run fanless. And also because it's something neat to show off to classmates (the dean said I was nuts, but that's the same thing he said about when I said I wanted to build a solar powered boat)

  77. too complicated by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first thing I thought is this is too complicated. A single LN2 compressor, some insulating tubes running into the box, and a heat exchange instead of a heat sink, you could easily chill that baby to 150K. The compressor would not even have to be in the same room. You would even have to charge it often if you kept the N2 clean.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  78. Jeez... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    With all that was spent on the cooling he could have bought a new processor instead of overclocking his 386 to 4Ghz.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  79. Absolutely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely. I mean, you'd get a lot more performance if you just ran Gentoo and optimised everything specifically for your machine!

  80. Re:minimum temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, no, liquid plutonium is far deadlier

    ...but not very cold.

  81. ...which... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    ... probably still worked with the same cooler.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  82. oh, you mean like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  83. Re:Someday by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 2, Informative
    don't think you could do that. Liquid nitrogen is diamagnetic, meaning it is slightly affected by magnetic fields. In other words, the coolant could possibly conduct enough electricity to cause damage the hardware.

    (Affected by magnetism) != conductivity

  84. worse than that, even. by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    Of course theres few direct paths like that across the die. Because of design considerations, signals take a somewhat circuitous route (pun completely intended). Because of this, they build flip-flops in wire to buffer the signals between clock ticks.

    If your clock is running high enough that the longest distance between buffer flip-flops is too far for the signal to reach, you'll have unreliable stability, obviously.

    And since intel, amd et al. never intended this particular class of chips to reach 15 ghz, or even half that, you can bet they didn't bother putting extra transistors and complexity in to create the necessary flip-flops to handle 10, 8 etc ghz speeds reliably.

    In fact, theres a fair bit of research a professor of mine has published about diminishing performance when you start putting too many buffers in-line. Its one of the many current design issues processor manufacturers face.

    --

    -

  85. Re:minimum temperature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pour liquid nitrogen on your hand and it will just evaporate from your skin without doing damage. To lose a finger you need to put your hand into the nitrogen container and keep it there.

  86. it's gonna get hot anyhow... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    ...some studies [which I am too lazy to look up right now, but including recent data from Mars, which, last time I looked, didn't have SUVs or coal fired power plants] show that things are heating up. Probably on a natural Sun cycle.

    So, turn on all the computers you want, it won't matter one whit, in the cosmic scheme of things.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  87. Useful! by grmb1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they can make PC case big and put a door in it, it can be used for long-term food storage. 'Internet connected refrigirator' anyone? :) On the other side, with freezing turned off, you can cook food on CPU, which qualifies it for 'Internet connected owen'. Useful thingie. And a computer too!

    --
    -- grmbl woz heer
  88. Re:and to think what that money would have bought. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    which would be 2.5k$ more(the refrigators seem to have been free for him) and much less fun(it's quite obvious that macci isn't doing this for profit, if you don't count advertising - he seems to be affiliated with a finnish pc shop).

    depending on what he heats his house with the bill might be ridiculous though, though i'm guessing the use for this rig will mainly be for short oc record runs(and as such might save a bundle as he doesn't need to get dry ice or liquid nitrogen for those attempts anymore).

    such records as "I've been able to push the AMD Athlon64 3200+ 2GHz chip thru the SuperPi 1M test at 3049MHz! As far as I know this is one of the highest if not the highest A64 2GHz clock on the planet.
    FYI - using the max. voltage the motherboard allowed (1.6V) this particular A64 chip would run at 2270MHz with high quality heatsink. With voltage of 1.7V it would just hit 2400MHz and that is about the limit with aircooled solutions. So the cascade gave a nice 600MHz boost here. Link to screenshot.

    (click for better view)

    You can find some more results from the 'Current Records' section. Currently The highest 3DMark03 score in the World (9529Marks) can be found from there too "

    so, with just 2500$ he couldn't have done those things with store parts, pure long run number crunching is a different issue though(but that's not the system was/is for).
    -

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  89. Why so low temperature? by grmb1 · · Score: 1

    What's the reason to -80C cooling, anyway? It's really far from superconducting temperatures (which probably will make things fater) and not very comfort for home use.

    I suppose +20C will make absolutely same effect and is much easier to achieve.

    --
    -- grmbl woz heer
  90. They may have a cool computer by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    But slashdot just fried their server.

  91. Re:Not Quite --- wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Q: what does the fact that the total amount of energy in the universe is a constant have to do with the theoretical possibility of offsetting global warming?

    A: nothing. Parent is not Informative.

  92. WARNING USELESS MODERATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go mod ~up~ some real comments, dumbass moderator.

  93. Why Not?-Because she's there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Doing it just for the sake of having done it is enough, if that is what you want to do."

    Have a kid.

  94. Re:minimum temperature by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

    Liquid paper and accidents are often found near each other, I find.

    YAW.

    --
    Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
  95. And the UPS... by trasgu · · Score: 1

    What UPS? (Bzzzt....)

  96. This is what people do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ..when it's dark for 20 hours a day for 5 months..

  97. Parent post: my favorite non-sanctioned mod by Durindana · · Score: 1

    -1, Pedantic

    (no, I don't claim to have made it up)

    1. Re:Parent post: my favorite non-sanctioned mod by Kissing+Crimson · · Score: 1

      Good idea, except for one thing: often someone's reply to the pedant sparks an interesting line of discussion.

      --
      What's that smell? Ah, that's my karma burning...
  98. Condensation? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, I know I'm a late post to the story, but I did RTFA, and he didn't say a word about condensation.
    When he temp-tested the main die, it was covered in frost. Now obviously, this setup was only done to set records, so he's not running it for more than a few minutes.
    What do other sub-freezing cooling systems do about the frost?

    --

  99. safety gear by nounderscores · · Score: 2, Funny

    hmm. so to be absolutely safe, you either wear a parka while working with liquid N2 or go buck naked. That sounds like a reality tv show right there.

  100. depends on where you put the heat. by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    I propose connecting your cpu and beer to a huge cooling tower that radiates to space from the dark side of the planet... wherever that may be at the moment.

    1. Re:depends on where you put the heat. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest radiating from the poles...you get months of darkness at a time down there. Your apparatus would be limited in height, though.

  101. Stop this! I mean it! by chadjg · · Score: 1

    Anybody want a peanut?

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
    1. Re:Stop this! I mean it! by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      -I fear you'll never come back!

      -Hear this now: I will always come back for you...

      -But how can you be so sure?

      -This is true love. You think this happens everyday?

    2. Re:Stop this! I mean it! by Teknon · · Score: 0

      As you wish

  102. My god, what have I done... by MrEd · · Score: 1

    I never meant for it to be this way - I was only trying to make a funny, honest!

    --

    Wah!

  103. I've never understood muscle cars of muscle chips by shpoffo · · Score: 1

    Yea it's a humorous use of one's time - but is there anything coming of this work? Is the only benefit to making your processor run faster at home the bragging rights?

    -shpoffo

  104. More Wronger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although liquid helium is the coldest known substance, it has a very low, ah, what, 'heat of vaporisation'. Meaning it takes a very small amount of heat to raise a given amount of liquid helium to its boiling point. So that, even though it's very very cold, it makes a rather inefficient refrigerant.

    I'm going back 35+ years for this, back to the days I was a kid interested in cryogenics and spilled a whole thermos bottle of dry ice and alcohol slush on my hand. Screw that, I took up model rocketry (launched parallel to the ground.)

    1. Re:More Wronger by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      When you say "liquid (whatever)", you're usually referring to it at the temperature just below its boiling point, which means it'll quickly boil anyway.

      I suppose the biggest disadvantage to liquid helium is it's difficult to cool it much farther, anyway. liquid N2 can at least be cooled to far below its boiling point.

  105. Says the www.akiba-pc.com server.... by chadjg · · Score: 2, Funny

    "You fell victim to one of the classic blunders. The most famous is 'Never get involved in a land war in Asia.' But only slightly less well known is this: "Never go in against Slashdot when bandwidth is on the line. Ha ha ha ha..." PFFT.... host not found...

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  106. Re:In Finland......the Gulf Stream... by Soulfarmer · · Score: 1

    Didn't warm me when biking to work at 12 minus Celsius "warmth". Nor did my comp stay cool enough. So much for the ambient temperature.

    (damn hackers btw...)

    --
    -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
  107. Two words, Sterling Engine. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    They get cold as hell, are much cheaper, more effecient, much quieter, much safer, less moving thingys to go boink.

    http://www.stirlingengine.com/

  108. Re:minimum temperature by ToW85 · · Score: 1
    when you have an accident with liquid nitrogen you lose a finger.

    You lose a finger only in the case you actually soak it in the liquid. If you just dip it in, nothing happens. I've tried...

    --
    99 bottles of beer on the wall... take one down, chug it a-down 98 bottles of beer on the wall... 98 bottles of beer on
  109. Not cold enough by xYoni69x · · Score: 1

    -100C? Ha, that's NOTHING. I'm waiting for when they get to -300C.

    --
    void*x=(*((void*(*)())&(x=(void*)0xfdeb58)))();
  110. Re:minimum temperature by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    Anyone found any Liquid of Mass Destruction (LMD) yet?!

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  111. Let's put the Drama back in PC Cooling... by mesach · · Score: 1

    We need to cool this PC or we're DOOMED...

    --
    moo.
  112. Whats the point when he can just wait a year... by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and AMD/Intel will bring out a processor with that clock speed anyway! And he'll look a bit stupid when his friends have their 4 Ghz desktops and
    he's got his 4Ghz , err , industrial freezer!

    1. Re:Whats the point when he can just wait a year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what kind of speeds do you think he'll be running at with that in a year when you are doing a lowly 4ghz?

  113. Re:minimum temperature by hankwang · · Score: 1
    > when you have an accident with liquid nitrogen you lose a finger.

    Actually, it is not a problem to bring your skin into contact with liquid nitrogen for 1 or 2 seconds. Between the skin and the LN2, a thin layer of gaseous nitrogen will form which will act as a thermal insulator. I've done that many times (I won't take responsibility in case anyone else tries this at home). After a few seconds, the skin will have cooled down sufficiently for the gas layer to disappear and only then you will get frostbite.

    The gas layer also prevents the LN2 from sticking to surfaces. It will just roll of the surface, similar to water droplets that float on a very hot surface (e.g. a hot plate in the kitchen). Hence, if you spill LN2 over your body, you will probably not suffer any damage, unless you are wearing shoes/clothes that can act as a reservoir.

    Liquid helium is not very dangerous either: because of its low temperature (4 K), nitrogen and oxygen in the air will immediately start condensing, thereby increasing the helium temperature and forming gaseous helium and liquid air, to which the same comments as above apply. LHe can only be used in closed circuits for this reason.

  114. Reading this... by -noefordeg- · · Score: 1

    I can't help stop thinking that this is pure madness :p

    From a geeky point of view I think it's quite cool but damn... Trying to think like an ordinary person I constantly think: -Madness!

  115. To much fuss... by Sindri · · Score: 1
    Why didn't they just put the whole box into the big freezer they had to begin with?

    "But you know those low-temp freezers they use in labs? Those that go down to like -80..-100C and can maintain the temperature."


    I assume it can also maintain the temperature with a running PC inside.
  116. Re:I've never understood muscle cars of muscle chi by bhima · · Score: 1
    Having moved from Muscle cars to rare bikes, I would say that the primary motivator is the mod (not really the result) and the knowledge how to do it.

    At least for me it is.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  117. Correction by TA · · Score: 1

    Ahem, you obviously did not read the article. You're saying that you could run a 3GHz chip at 4GHz at 0 celsius, the article on the other hand said that in fact he had to go all the way down to -100 celsius to go that one gigahertz. 3 -> 4 and 2 -> 3, for a couple of chip types he tried. He also implied that at around zero you would only be able to go a few hundred megahertz at the most.

  118. Re:minimum temperature by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    The advantage is that all you need to do is put the plutonium in a compact position...it'll melt itself. :)

  119. Probably won't work by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    with standard case fans. Pulling air through a long tube is harder than pulling it out of the surrounding ambient air in the case...

  120. Re:minimum temperature by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 1

    You need a lot of liquid nitrogen for it to have any kind of effect. The temperature difference between the liquid nitrogen and your finger results in the liquid which comes even close to your finger to evaporize. you get a layer of gas around your finger which keeps the liquid of - for a while. and even afterwards once the actual liquid touches you the effect is that of a medium severe frostbite. To actually deepfreeze your finger it takes a damn lot. trust me, ew played around with that stuff in the lab all the time freezing backpacks to the ground, splashing that over others labcoats and whatnot. It really isn't as dangerous as bad scifi movies want you to believe.

  121. Wrong way to go... by confused+one · · Score: 1

    For the cost of all this, they could have easily put the cpu in liquid nitrogen and paid for enough nitrogen to last for years...

  122. Stopgap measure by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
    Is -100C cold enough for you?

    That will be cold enough for this and the next generation of AMDs, but what about after that? :) Or will computers double as space heaters?

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  123. Re:minimum temperature by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    That's because the stuff immediately vaporizes around your finger, creating a nice insulating layer of gas.

  124. ...and if it didn't by pdbaby · · Score: 1

    then Intel could apply for a trademark on "Intel outside"

    --
    Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
  125. what about condensation? by putch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    there is almost always a little ambient moisture in the air. wouldn't condensation form on the heatsink and thus threaten the stability of the whole system.

    it's awfully cool--pun intended--but are below freezing cooling systems necessary.

    granted, haven't gotten my hands on doom3 yet.

    --
    just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!
  126. Starcraft Quote by Dareth · · Score: 1

    "Thank God for cold fusion!"

    Love that game!!

    Sorry for the spoiler *wink*

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  127. There is such a thing as too cold by b-baggins · · Score: 1

    OK, guys, getting your CPU too cold is just as bad for it. In my college days I worked in the Military Test unit for a fab. One of the things we had to do was cold soak test the chips. We used LN2 to bring the test machines down to anywhere from -80 to -170. We had a significant failure rate once we got much below -100.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  128. OT: Posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why is it becoming harder to post on slashdot? 4/5 of the time I get an incomplete page when I press submit or preview.
    I've only noticed this on Moz firebird on Win32 when posting from work, anybody else?
    1. Re:OT: Posting by menscher · · Score: 1

      I had the problem when trying to post the "article text" of the 6,000,000-digit prime number a few weeks ago. I think it's something to do with the size of the post. ;) I was using Mozilla under RH9 at the time. IE under Win2k just hung.