Slashdot Mirror


ISS May Have A Leak

Rio writes "The International Space Station is experiencing a slow, steady drop in air pressure, and American and Russian flight controllers are investigating possible causes of the leak. The Local 6 News report says Mission Control notified astronaut Michael Foale and cosmonaut Alexander Kaleri about the leak just before their bedtime late Monday afternoon. Mission Control first noticed the drop in pressure Jan. 1 and said the data showed a daily decline of about 2 millimeters of mercury. As of Monday, the pressure had declined a total of nine millimeters. That is equivalent to about one-quarter of a pound per square inch, said NASA spokesman James Hartsfield."

523 comments

  1. Will this be like by michaelhood · · Score: 0, Insightful

    the movie Airplane?

    FP.

  2. IIS May Have a Leak by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny
    Before I saw that the category was about space, I thought they were talking about the Web Server.

    Damn Slashdot... I was about to come out in my penguin outfit to show my Linux Pride.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oddly enough, this Google search indicates that IIS may have a leak after all.

    2. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Because they have the same letters, LOLOL!

      They don't have the same letters. One is I-I-S, the other is I-S-S.

      You are a fucking moron. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

    3. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by znode · · Score: 2, Informative
      someone made a "funny" remark about Microsoft's ISS. Because they have the same letters
      You mean Microsoft's IIS?
    4. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes you're right, because the webserver has this funny letter 'II', and the space station has the letter 'SS'.

      You fucking moron.

    5. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by iamplasma · · Score: 5, Funny

      Before I saw that the category was about space, I thought they were talking about the Web Server.

      I'd have thought the need to use the word "may" in the topic would be a giveaway that we clearly weren't talking about IIS.

    6. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does someone smell a fart? ewww. -ISS

    7. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I get it. You're saying that "I" is the same letter as "S", just not as curvy. Right?

    8. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are right, the problem actually *is* Microsoft's web server software. They just installed it up there, and as everyone knows, that software just plains sucks. Hence the pressure drop.

    9. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was sarcasm. Read carefully. 'IIS' and 'ISS' have the same letters. Do you get it yet or do you need me to apply a hammer to your face?

    10. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      'The "AND" operator is unnecessary -- we include all search terms by default.'

    11. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by EvanED · · Score: 4, Funny

      While the parent did get the IIS/ISS thing wrong, whether or not they have the same letters is up for interpretation.

      I would tend toward the interpretation that they *do* have the same letters:
      "IIS" has the letters {I, S}
      "ISS" has the letters {I, S}
      The two sets are the same.

      IMO, I think to get at what you're saying you would need to say they have the same letters with the same frequencies.

      But this is just a matter of opinion, and I don't think my way is "right" and your way is "wrong".

    12. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no, no.

      Just as V'ger turned out to be Voyager, it turns out that Mir is Microsoft which isn't a surprise since that space station crashed and burned.

    13. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny?

    14. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check out this pretty detailed article on the ISS leak over on SciScoop.

    15. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      Ok, so clearly this is not about IIS, but about IIS. But if IIS is powered down, does it still leak?

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    16. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by isorox · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'll have to install a microsoft vacuum cleaner, the only thing in the universe guarenteed not to suck.

    17. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by cdyson37 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard that the water-processing pH buffers overflowed.

      Sorry, it had to be said!

    18. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha that made my day, thanks.

    19. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they also "clearly werent talking about IIS" because they said ISS and no one every said IIS in the post. try to pay attention jackarses.

    20. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are "obsessive".

    21. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah--it blows ;)

    22. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by MrEd · · Score: 1
      Mir is Microsoft which isn't a surprise since that space station crashed and burned


      No way!


      Mir had a 13-year uptime, and it only crashed because of a hardware failure. :)

      --

      Wah!

    23. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    24. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have lysdexia and didn't make this tismake.

    25. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by isorox · · Score: 1

      If you all put your heads together maybe you could light a Xmas tree light.

      Perhaps, but it's twelth night, and I've taken my xmas lights down for another year

    26. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overly Critical Guy has yet to put forward a coherent or logical argument for his tired and continually discredited views. He sure hates Slashdot, but he continues to post here!

    27. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by mjuszczak · · Score: 1

      Yep, definitely thought so too! I even forwarded the email to my boss already, with a lovely little attachment about why FreeBSD and Apache is so much better and more reliable. Oops ;=)

    28. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your brain has a leak.

      LOLOL!

    29. Re:IIS May Have a Leak by Eviscero · · Score: 1

      Since this release, NASA stated that the pressure has been stablized yet they have no idea as to why the pressure was dropping in the first place. Dont you think they should figure that shit out soon? If i was up there, I'd be alittle nervous.

      --


      It's not what you know; It's what you can find out.
  3. Toolkit by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Funny

    Two spoons, chalk, washing up bowl, rubber patch, glue.

    1. Re:Toolkit by Damon+Campagna · · Score: 1

      You forgot the bubble gum!

    2. Re:Toolkit by lanswitch · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just ducktape the inside of iis? Quick and dirty, but it works.

    3. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Got any particular part of the station in mind, or do you want them to tape the whole thing up (thus rendering everything unusuable)? It's not like the station is just some big, empty metal tube. It's packed full of equipment.

      Sealing the leak is the easy part. Finding the leak is the hard part.

    4. Re:Toolkit by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot the towel. Remember when you're travelling through space to never forget your towel.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where's macguyver when ya need him?

    6. Re:Toolkit by Penguinshit · · Score: 4, Funny



      Just look around outside for the hissing white spray, like they do in the movies and bad Star Trek episodes...

    7. Re:Toolkit by Penguinshit · · Score: 5, Funny



      Duct tape only worked on Mir (which, incidentally, is the Russian word for "duct tape").

    8. Re:Toolkit by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      The bubble gum is for making bubbles. Turn off the fans and let them drift.

    9. Re:Toolkit by JPriest · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I must be the only person I've met that didn't like that book.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    10. Re:Toolkit by Blackneto · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you meet yourself coming or going?

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
    11. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the world would they use duct tape? There is no biological weapons in space...Duh!

    12. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Uhm, Mir means 'peace' and 'world' in Russian...

    13. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All they have to do is fill the inside with water, and see where the water is squirting from.

    14. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up

    15. Re:Toolkit by jmb-d · · Score: 1

      Two spoons, chalk, washing up bowl, rubber patch, glue.

      Isn't that how the Predator fixed its arm?

      --
      In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
      -- Yun-Men
    16. Re:Toolkit by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Heh! I nearly included washing up liquid in the list. :-)

    17. Re:Toolkit by DickBreath · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why don't they just ducktape the inside of iis? Quick and dirty, but it works.

      I believe that you would find that the inside of IIS is made exclusively of ducktape. That would partially explain why it has had so many security vulnerabilities. Quick and dirty is the name of the game, as long as it has shiny graphics and glossy marketing materials. However, I would debate your point about how well IIS works.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    18. Re:Toolkit by nsushkin · · Score: 1

      or "ointment" as in "mirom pomazannyj"

    19. Re:Toolkit by Dick+Faze · · Score: 3, Informative

      And oddly enough, that's what duct tape was made for.

      Also, Duct Tape is the silvery cloth gear, Duck Tape is what you use to tape up your bird.

    20. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duck Tape is the most readily available brand of duct-tape-like-substance in US convenience stores.

    21. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an obvious reference for those of us that don't sit around and pull our pud all day.
      Smoke a J and watch some South Park...look for Towelie.
      Sick masturbating girl-less fucks..

    22. Re:Toolkit by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Actually mir means world, mip means peace.

    23. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, but you assume they knew that and that is what they meant. Its not, they just don't know any better. Similarly, "anyways" is not a word, its a bastardization of "anyway" and incorrectly used in place of it. People will argue this as well, becuase "that's what I've always heard". Yet another case where everyone is wrong.

    24. Re:Toolkit by darqchild · · Score: 1

      i believe that "Duck Tape" was the term used by the US military before somone realized that it was useful for patching leaks in ventilation systems

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    25. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, or fill the outside with water and look for bubbles :\

    26. Re:Toolkit by tgraupmann · · Score: 1

      They just need to repaint the outside of the station. The paint will freeze and the leak will be fixed.

      I think suffocation is the worst way to die.

    27. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, i'm gonna keep callin it duck tape anyways.

    28. Re:Toolkit by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      American Heritage Dictionary (a dictionary I feel strangely loyal feelings towards) begs to differ, although they also consider "anyways" to be a "non-standard" phrase, so it's probably best avoided, especially because "anyway" works just as well.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    29. Re:Toolkit by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      Actually mir means world, mip means peace.

      Aah, but you see, letter "p" in Cyrillics (which Russians use) is pronounced as Western "r", so your "mip" is actually "mir".

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    30. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but that dictionary was just created to make the likes of George Bush feel better.

    31. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dictionary isn't a definitive way to speak a language, it is a record of the way language was spoken at a set point in time. Languages change, words change, word usage change. Over time languages become whole new languages even.

      It is actually humorous when people like you break out the dictionary to prove "That's not a word!"

      It is equivalent to a new guini tribesman breaking out an anthropologists notebook to prove "That's not a taboo!"

      I'm still laughing!

    32. Re:Toolkit by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      I know that, and I was arguing that it was a word. American Heritage is pretty good at catching up with the evolution of language. And anyway, not all words are in the dictionary, but if something is defined in a relatively recent dictionary, it's a word. Words don't go away very quickly. The worst that could've happened was to become non-standard, which they already claim it is.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    33. Re:Toolkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If, and this is a big If, they can find the
      place where the leak is, then good-old-fashioned
      chewing gum is just the ticket!

      Linux? Sure, I have it on this boxen, but today
      I'm using Win98-DOS/Arachne 1.70!

    34. Re:Toolkit by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      I can take the latin derived languages...Slavick is just a bit too much!!!

      End I think I had it backwards anyway - meant it to be mir means peace, mip means world. Oh well. I'll shutup now

    35. Re:Toolkit by forrestt · · Score: 1

      I can see the universe's largest bubblegum bubble now.

      I guess Guiness will have to expand their records to include outerspace!!!

    36. Re:Toolkit by rifter · · Score: 2, Funny

      i believe that "Duck Tape" was the term used by the US military before somone realized that it was useful for patching leaks in ventilation systems

      Were that true, I shudder to think what they were doing with it before then, or what it meant to the ducks. What else do you believe? :)

    37. Re:Toolkit by tubamaster · · Score: 1

      I too have read that the previous name was "Duck." It was called this because it turned water, like a duck's feathers.

  4. Martian Sabotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is payback from the Martians.

  5. bump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, either they'll find out what went bump last November, or everyone will die and we'll be subjected to another Tom Hanks space movie.

    1. Re:bump by AIX-Hood · · Score: 4, Funny

      'Houston, we've got a wicked seepage up here' In other news, Fixodent stock is up 5 points.

    2. Re:bump by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Houston, we're passing gas."

    3. Re:bump by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was Apollo 16. The potassium enhanced OJ that they gave the crew gave them enhanced flatulence. Not a good thing in a small 3-man capsule.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    4. Re:bump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they die, our leaders decide space is dangerous and make going there illegal (for the children). If they live they get a movie.

  6. duct tape by potpie · · Score: 5, Funny

    they have duct tape, right? If they don't they'll REALLY be in trouble.

    --
    Esoteric reference.
    1. Re:duct tape by EverlastGobstopp · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you can't duct it, f**k it

    2. Re:duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If they don't have any duct tape maybe they could use Perl. After all it is the duct tape of the Inter... oh.

    3. Re:duct tape by notyou2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's absurd... you can't fix a leak in a space station using duct tape.

      Such a job clearly requires silly putty.

    4. Re:duct tape by iabervon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, patching a leak in a space station is somewhat similar to taping a duct. And the only thing that duct tape is bad for is taping ducts.

    5. Re:duct tape by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Why not use those stick pads for inflatable kiddie pools and inflatable beds and chairs?

      Or Silly Puddy, or better yet...Fruit Cake. Nothing can destroy Fruit Cake.

    6. Re:duct tape by dbleoslow · · Score: 3, Funny

      If only they had an inadimate carbon rod.

    7. Re:duct tape by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quick! Somebody call Red Green!

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    8. Re:duct tape by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unfortunately, patching a leak in a space station is somewhat similar to taping a duct. And the only thing that duct tape is bad for is taping ducts.

      Now taping ducks on the other hand, is one of its greatest strengths.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    9. Re:duct tape by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny

      It works. I never tape a duck with anything else.

    10. Re:duct tape by ls+-lR · · Score: 1

      s/inadimate/inanimate/

      as in "not animated"

    11. Re:duct tape by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, patching a leak in a space station is somewhat similar to taping a duct. And the only thing that duct tape is bad for is taping ducts.
      That's mostly because 99% of the tape sold as 'duct tape', isn't.
    12. Re:duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't forget the case of j0 m0mma, in which I did both. kept the screaming down to whisper

    13. Re:duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what?

    14. Re:duct tape by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 2, Funny
      Tell Mr. Bush then that "nuclear" is pronounced "new-clear", not "noo-koo-lar".

      And while we're at it, it's "al-you-min-ee-um", not "al-oo-min-um".

      I feel better now.

    15. Re:duct tape by xA40D · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, patching a leak in a space station is somewhat similar to taping a duct. And the only thing that duct tape is bad for is taping ducts

      Which is why people who know call it by it's correct name "Gaffa Tape". Or simply "gaffa".

      The rest of the world would call it gaffa tape too if only we could stop the persistent bickering on whether gaffa is spelt "gaffa" or "gaffer". Internecine battles asside, gaffa is without a doubt the most useful substance in the universe.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    16. Re:duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please forget images of the semi-human alien in Alien 4 that was sucked into space through a pin hole. Deep vacuum doesn't present a large differential pressure from atmospheric pressure. 100 KPa isn't much.

      You could fix a leak in a space station with duct tape. Never mind a proper structural repair.

      Later,
      AC

    17. Re:duct tape by anotherone · · Score: 1

      Gaffer's tape is completely different from Duct Tape.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    18. Re:duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you building a time machine, too? I dont think Timmy will want to ride one of those again.

    19. Re:duct tape by xA40D · · Score: 1

      Gaffer's tape is completely different from Duct Tape.

      Yes it is isnt it. Which is why I mentioned it not.

      I may have foolishly used a possessive apostrophe where one was not called for ("it's") for which I'll obviously burn in hell. But I never once referred to the tape of the Gaffer. Although, confusingly, a Gaffer is an electrician, and the sparks are are always a good bet for obtaining a roll of gaffa.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    20. Re:duct tape by jafac · · Score: 2, Funny

      remember kiddies. . .
      nothing says "poor workmanship" like wrinkles in the duct tape. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    21. Re:duct tape by pvt_medic · · Score: 1

      ah duct tape isnt that how they kept the MIR is space for so long.

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
    22. Re:duct tape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And what I'm saying is that Duct tape is not the same thing as Gaffer's Tape, Gaffer Tape, Gaffer, Gaffa, or whatever you're talking about.

      Duct tape is silver whereas Gaffer's Tape is Black.

    23. Re:duct tape by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Actually you can get both in various different colors now. The difference is that duct tape has a nasty evil adhesive which smells bad and gets all over anything you put it on, whereas gaff tape has a nice adhesive that doesn't make an enormous mess.

  7. Sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    one small use for toothpaste...

    1. Re:Sounds like by Fryed · · Score: 5, Funny

      one small use for toothpaste...

      One giant leap for MacGuyver fans around the world

  8. So .... what's their plan of action? by NightSpots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They say "There are no immediate concerns for the safety or health of the crew", but what are they doing about it?

    When is it time to take action?
    Do they have a way to leave?

    They have a supply of Oxygen and Nitrogen to repressurize the station, but how long will that last?

    It would be nice to sit in on the decision-making, just to observe...

    1. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Exiler · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think, although I'm not at all sure, that there are Soyuz on the ISS for emergency departure.

      --
      Banaaaana!
    2. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by lone_marauder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They say "There are no immediate concerns for the safety or health of the crew", but what are they doing about it?

      Looking for it.

      When is it time to take action?

      You mean, try to fix it, or abandon the station? Now for the former and when it gets about 1000 times worse and becomes a threat to life support for the latter.

      Do they have a way to leave?

      Yes. A Soyuz spacecraft is always docked to the station in the case of an emergency evacuation.

      My approach would be thus: if the leak cannot be located, start sealing off compartments (this means effectively turning them off, I believe) If it gets that bad, though, I think it means abandoning the affected compartment. This combined with the November event concerns me greatly, but it isn't time to panic yet.

      --
      who are those slashdot people? they swept over like Mongol-Tartars.
    3. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude I heard they're calling you in to take care of the situation.

    4. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by wankledot · · Score: 2, Funny

      1000 times? they don't have to wait that long .25psi is 1/58th of an atmosphere, in 30 days they would be down to .5 atmospheres, which seems like it would be getting pretty dangerous to me.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    5. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by valmont · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bruce Willis?

    6. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps a material science expert could comment but my experience of this sort of leak is that it tends to force a bigger hole as it goes.

      I'd be worried about it hitting a tipping point and really getting nasty fast.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    7. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Depends on the nature of the hole. A leak in a seam may not expand. A leak through material thinned due to corrosion definitely will. I just had first-hand experience with that on a hot water line in the wall of my house.

      But also remember that as the pressure gets lower, there is less force pushing air *out* the hole.

    8. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 5, Informative
      1000 times? they don't have to wait that long .25psi is 1/58th of an atmosphere, in 30 days they would be down to .5 atmospheres, which seems like it would be getting pretty dangerous to me.

      They are losing 2 mmHg daily, which is 0.03867 psi daily. Normal atmospheric pressure is 760 mmHg, and 0.5 atm is 380 mmHg. If this leak is at a constant rate (which might not be true) then it will take 190 days to get down to 0.5 atm, which is about half a year. Also, I suspect that a healthy man could be subjected to well below 0.5 atm, especially if the pressure were reduced so gradually.

    9. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by jigyasubalak · · Score: 1

      You would think that they'd have an action plan when they embark on such a gigantic, life-critical project.

      Coloring the air inside and lookingout for the colored air coming out, comes to my dumb mind, though ;)

      --
      The best planning can be done after the project completes.
    10. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      unless they keep repressurising?

      In any event they really need to find it fast.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    11. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could perhaps show up on the out side as a frosty spot since it would also be leaking humidity?

    12. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by wankledot · · Score: 1

      I guess their mmHg/psi conversion was incorrect. your numbers look better.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    13. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Naffer · · Score: 1

      It's only dropped 9mm of mercury. They should have 720 of those. They'll be fine.

    14. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Wavicle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Also, I suspect that a healthy man could be subjected to well below 0.5 atm, especially if the pressure were reduced so gradually.

      When I was taking physics in college, one of the professors there was an ex-SR-71 pilot (it was a community college) and gave a talk about air pressure, air mix and breathing. (It was some years ago, so hopefully I remember the pertinent facts)

      At the altitude the SR-71 flew, the air pressure was something like 1 or 2 millibars (I forget exactly, but it was really close to zero) and for entirely practical reasons the cockpit could not be pressurized, so the pilots sat in a "space suit" (it wasn't an actual space suit, but pretty close). However the space suit couldn't be pressurized to 1 atm or it would be too stiff for the pilot to move.

      The obvious solution was to drop the pressure in the suit, but as it turns out if you drop the pressure too low, the partial pressure of CO2 in your lungs doesn't get high enough for it to send a signal to your autonomic nervous system to take a breath. It turns out that when the CO2 in your lungs reaches a partial pressure of about 5% of 1atm, your brain decides its time to take a breath.

      What this all boils down to is, as the pressure drops, the relative concentration of oxygen has to increase to keep the balance of the partial pressure of oxygen and CO2 in your lungs, or you will start suffering symptoms of oxygen deprivation.

      I believe in the case the prof was lecturing on, a pure oxygen mix at 3.5 psi was enough to keep you lucid while being low enough you could actually move around.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    15. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by wrmrxxx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ugh... three different units of measurement for the same thing in one sentence. Does anyone know the SI units for confusion?

    16. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      I'll say they have no concern for the health of the crew. They told them about a leak just before bedtime.

    17. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Check what pressure is being maintained on the ISS before you start your calculator.

    18. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by MemoryAid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Here's a couple of thoughts:

      1. Typical leaks are faster at higher pressure, so as pressure decreases, the leak rate decreases. I don't remember off the top of my head any equations for flow through an orifice, but the leak will taper off and approach zero psi (mbar, mmHg, whatever, zero is zero) asymptotically.

      2. A rough rule of thumb that I have heard is that at 18000 feet, half of the atmosphere (by mass) is below you. I think that corresponds to 0.5 atmospheres, but I don't know that equation, either. And it's only a rule of thumb.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    19. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? In your dreams he only takes care of asteroids in uranus.

    20. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 4, Informative
      Ugh... three different units of measurement for the same thing in one sentence. Does anyone know the SI units for confusion?

      The S.I. unit for pressure would be kg/(m sec**2), normally referred to as Pascal, or Pa for short. 1 mmHg ~= 133.32 Pa. 1 psi ~= 6894.8 Pa. 1 atm = 101325 Pa. 1 bar = 1e5 Pa, therefore 1 mbar = 100 Pa. Would you also like to know torr, inHg, and inH2O?

      How can you tell a mathematician from an engineer? A mathematician won't use units anywhere in an equation, whereas the engineer will use 6 different units for the same thing in the same equation, just to make things interesting.

    21. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out this pretty detailed article on the ISS leak over on SciScoop.

    22. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does anyone know the SI units for confusion?

      You mean information entropy? Bits?

    23. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Alioth · · Score: 2, Informative

      It wouldn't be good to subject someone to 0.5atm on regular air (20% O2) as their brain won't be functioning right even if they are still alive.

      At 10,000 feet MSL, atmospheric pressure is around 19in Hg (IIRC). At sea level, standard pressure is 29.92in Hg. Most people are starting to be affected in some way by hypoxia when in an unpressurized plane at 10,000 feet MSL - they may feel perfectly alright, but they are mentally nowhere near as sharp as they would be at sea level. Not really a good thing in the ISS.

      0.5atm is the equivalent of being at around 15,000 ft MSL without supplimental oxygen. The FAA requires pilots be using oxygen at this altitude in unpressurized aircraft. Most people are showing quite obvious hypoxia at this altitude without supplimental oxygen.

    24. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by cluckshot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good report on the facts. I do believe they have space suits on the station...

      Regards to this problem, the loss of this much air should impart a significant rate to the space station. This would make it tend to make the station spin or move a bit. As a result the location of the leak should be pretty easy to determine.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    25. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by nilsjuergens · · Score: 1
      The S.I. unit for pressure would be kg/(m sec**2), normally referred to as Pascal, or Pa for short.
      One Pascal is one Newton per square meter, or Pa = N/m^2
      I wanted to mention it because it is easier to remember.
      --
      -- Having problems sending big files over the net? Try out Efisto (http://efisto.org)
    26. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by jokerghost · · Score: 1

      >How can you tell a mathematician from an engineer?

      A mathematician drives my taxi, but can tell me exactly it will take to get to my destination.

    27. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by cdyson37 · · Score: 1

      If this leak is at a constant rate (which might not be true)

      I suspect that the rate of pressure loss is proportional to the difference in pressue (since the other pressure is a vacuum, we can say that it's proportional to the pressure in the compartment). Assuming the hole isn't getting any wider.
      I suspect they've got external cameras on that thing, presumably - why not release some brightly coloured gas (from a cansiter:) and see if it's visible? (Obviously one closed compartment at a time so they can still see inside).

    28. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm... is there a GPS on board?
      It would show the orbit change due to this accidental rocket engine. At least you would know what surface orientations to check.

    29. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by jelle · · Score: 1

      But the engineer gets you within a block of your destination two weeks earlier.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    30. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Phattypants · · Score: 1
      My approach would be thus: if the leak cannot be located, start sealing off compartments

      Not sure if this is what you were saying, but wouldn't this be an effective way to isolate the leak? Start sealing off comparments and watch for when the pressure stops dropping?

      I am sure that I am over simplifying here since nothing in space is simple. Does anyone know if such an approach is feasible?
    31. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      2 mmHg is about 2-3 thousandths of an atmosphere. I think they have a while before they need to worry.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    32. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Suidae · · Score: 1

      In addition to the CO2 partial pressure issue, I've read that below around 3psi its starts getting difficult to generate enough of a pressure difference to draw air into the lungs quickly enough.

    33. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Suidae · · Score: 1

      I used to fly occasionally in an unpressuried private plane at a max altitude of 19,000 feet. It was interesting for us passengers to turn off our oxygen for long periods and attempt to play various games. If you just sit still and don't do anything you're ok, but as soon as you try to sustain any kind of mental or physical effort it quickly becomes obvious that you are having issues. Lots of fun :)

    34. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It gets a little more complicated than that... I think even with the hypercapnic respiratory drive suppressed you've still got the hypoxic drive. At least, normal healthy people should. See this document for more than you ever wanted to know about respiratory drive. But yeah, pure oxygen in the 3.5 to 4 psi neighborhood has long been used for spacecraft and pressure suits. Of course, you've got to either reduce the pressure very slowly or prebreathe pure O2 for a while first or risk getting the bends due to pressure change.

    35. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by dolphi0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would be longer than 190 days. The rate of the leak changes logarithmically, not linearly. The driving force for the leak (the pressure pushing the air out) is decreasing, and as it does, so will the rate of the leak. It's the same principle as punching a hole in the bottom of a bucket filled with water, and watching the water stream get slower and shorter.

      Working it out, it should be a little over 260 days.

      Just FYI :)

    36. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by matfud · · Score: 1

      Its not quite that simple. Although the compartments can be sealed, doing so is quite complex. There are many electrical and other connections between the compartments that are routed through the access hatches. These have to be dismantled and assessments made of how this will effect the functionality of the station. (note they can just yank the cables in an emergency but doing to can cuase problems that they probably wish to avoid)

    37. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you misinterpreted the statement. "There are no immediate concerns for the safety or health of the crew." i.e. - "we don't give a shit, sweet dreams"

    38. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by shams42 · · Score: 1

      Even if they could function at .5 atm without serious mental lapses, they certainly would not be able to undertake the strenuous exercise that keeps their muscles and bones from breaking down.

    39. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      whereas the engineer will use 6 different units for the same thing in the same equation

      Engineers use equations? I thought they used calculators.
    40. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Of course, you've got to either reduce the pressure very slowly or prebreathe pure O2 for a while first or risk getting the bends due to pressure change.

      You think 190 days is long enough? :-)

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    41. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      You would think that they'd have an action plan when they embark on such a gigantic, life-critical project.

      Coloring the air inside and lookingout for the colored air coming out, comes to my dumb mind, though ;)


      Color it with what? The ISS is a closed environment, so anything you release into the atmosphere will stay there for years. Once you find and fix the leak, you've now got a colored gas in the station's air system. It need to be completely non-toxic, since the astronauts will be breathing it for long periods of time. It can't be too vivid a color, or it will obscure vision. It can't react with other materials, or it will interfere with experiments.

      Basically, the only gasses that meet these requirements are the noble gasses, and those are colorless.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    42. Re:So .... what's their plan of action? by mjuszczak · · Score: 1

      I'm reading the book Lost Moon By Jim Lovell. In the first few pages he talks about how NASA never makes a big deal out of things until they absolutely have to. Maybe there is a danger and they just don't want to admit it yet.

  9. What!? by dominion · · Score: 5, Funny

    just before their bedtime late Monday afternoon

    Astronauts have a bedtime?!? Screw that, there's goes my plans for the future.

    1. Re:What!? by Dark_Nova · · Score: 5, Funny

      I imagine that they they didn't sleep well that night...

      MISSION CONTROL: "Hey guys, have a good night's sleep, and by the way, the Space Station is slowly depressurizing, and we can't work out why. Oh well, see you in the morning.".

    2. Re:What!? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      "Louie, Louie, oh no - we gotta go!" == Motorhead

      http://www.geocities.com/ironwallcoleman/songs/l ou ie.htm

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    3. Re:What!? by mantera · · Score: 1



      i really don't know about sleep, but i wonder if farting in bed would help the situation...

      a somewhat unsexy habit on earth may prove lifesaving in space... just gotta wonder if chicken paste and freezedried strawberries they had for dinner will give them enough gas to repressurize the cabin...

    4. Re:What!? by sbma44 · · Score: 1
      "Hey guys, have a good night's sleep, and by the way, the Space Station is slowly depressurizing, and we can't work out why. Oh well, see you in the morning.
      ...probably."
    5. Re:What!? by MenTaLguY · · Score: 1

      Seriously almost.

      I believe the actual message was something like "...don't let the space bugs bite. And don't worry about the pressure thing; we'll have some procedures for you to try in the morning."

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
  10. Visible? by irokitt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Would a leak this size be visible from outside of the station? I.E. would you see a small stream of gas? And since the ISS is broken into compartments, they should be able to seal each compartment and iron the leak down to a single compartment. Then its a matter of finding the leak itself.

    --
    If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    1. Re:Visible? by NightSpots · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's even a cargo ship that's docked to the station ... they've been testing valves all night, I'm guessing they'll wait til that Russian ship leaves, and if the leak doesn't disappear, then they'll start to get concerned.

      If you assume that the more complex a seal is, the better chance it has of leaking, then the docking hardware might be a good place to start looking.

    2. Re:Visible? by TwinBeam · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the humidity is high enough that a bit of ice might accumulate outside around the hole?

    3. Re:Visible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      a bit of ice might accumulate outside around the hole

      You mean like my ex-wife?

    4. Re:Visible? by ls+-lR · · Score: 1

      If it's a slow leak then I wouldn't expect to be able to see anything just by looking. After all, we're talking about air here, it's not really going to stand out against the stark blackness of space. And even if you could see something, the amount of surface area on the outside of the ship is enormous and there are a limited number of windows. It could be coming from any little joit or crack, so you'd have to really have an eagle eye to detect it.

      I'm sure they have ways of detecting these things (such as looking for small differences in pressure, or currents) but I would doubt that any of them involve looking for visible streams on the outside.

    5. Re:Visible? by rew · · Score: 4, Funny

      I.E. would you see a small stream of gas? As far as I remember from my physics classes, the gas they use in the ISS for life support (commonly referred to as "air") is transparent.

    6. Re:Visible? by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      Would a leak this size be visible from outside of the station? I.E. would you see a small stream of gas? And since the ISS is broken into compartments, they should be able to seal each compartment and iron the leak down to a single compartment. Then its a matter of finding the leak itself.

      I believe the proper procedure is to coat the entire station with soapy water and look for bubbles.

    7. Re:Visible? by Kombat · · Score: 1

      I take it you've never exhaled on a cold winter's day?

      There is water vapour in air. As the warm air from inside the ISS leaks to the cold vacuum of space, the moisture in the air would instantly condense.

      In short, yes, a significant leak would be visible. It would look like the gas from a boiling kettle.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    8. Re:Visible? by Xzisted · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the condensation in it crystalizes at freezing. So you would see a vapor as it leaked.

      --

      Honesty may be the best policy, but apparently by elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    9. Re:Visible? by jelle · · Score: 1

      What if the leak is behind a panel, and the condensed air is just building up behind the panel, slowly leaking out instead of being blown out?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    10. Re:Visible? by rew · · Score: 1

      The pressure outside the ISS is quite close to zero. Water boils at quite a low temperature at that pressure. So, the water won't condensate to water droplets as in the cold in the winter.

      The reason your breath makes a plume is that the warm air touches/mixes with the cold air outside, and therefore cools down. Outside the ISS there is no air to touch and cool down the escaping air.

      The gas will cool while expanding. As in a CO2 fire extinguiser, this may lower the temperature of the gas below boiling/freezing point. However, the question then is: what's the boiling point of air in vacuum? I expect WAY lower than the obtained temperature through expansion.

      Look at it this way: As there is no counter-pressure outside the ISS, an escaping molecule of air/water will simply continue going in the direction and speed that it was going when it passed the smallest point in the leak. It will most likely be km's away before it will hit another molecule, and then it will bounce off, instead of clumping together (i.e. forming something in the liquid or solid state).

    11. Re:Visible? by Rxke · · Score: 1

      but it contains water (vapour), and *that* would be visible, because it would cristallize....

    12. Re:Visible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehehe, thanks for the laugh

  11. ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just submerge it in water and look for the bubbles.

    Or in this case space and look for the air.

    1. Re:ok by Exiler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They could probally make some lather and cover the station in soap while spacewalking, that would help...

      --
      Banaaaana!
    2. Re:ok by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Or just release a little bit of water watch where it goes. Of course, when the electrical outage occurs, they will have more interesting issues to deal with.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:ok by virtual_mps · · Score: 1

      > They could probally make some lather and cover
      > the station in soap while spacewalking

      You've been watching Enterprise again, haven't you?

    4. Re:ok by DV · · Score: 1

      Actually, look in which direction the station
      starts rotating around its gravity center.
      If you emit gaz, well you act as a space motor
      the conservation of quantity of movement means
      thhe damn thing will start rotate in the opposite
      direction.
      When you can hear the whistle that mean the
      pressure cooking is done, I think it will be
      mostly the same there if nothing is done ...

      Daniel

  12. No Luck... by natelr · · Score: 1

    They just cant catch a break. After every success, some problem always seems to follow. Loose a shuttel, probe lands on Mars, ISS springs a leak, what next?

    1. Re:No Luck... by irokitt · · Score: 1

      With this pattern, it's going to be a good thing.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:No Luck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next we'll find that every alien resembles Michael Jackson.

    3. Re:No Luck... by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 2, Funny


      SETI finds something?

    4. Re:No Luck... by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would it be bad news if instead something finds SETI?

    5. Re:No Luck... by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      There will be a resemblance, after Michael learns what the aliens look like.

    6. Re:No Luck... by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 2, Funny

      That depends on whether that something has developed ray guns.

    7. Re:No Luck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 funny

    8. Re:No Luck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with distributed SETI, aiming is less of a problem.

  13. At this rate by dtfinch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They'll run out of air within the next couple hundred days. But that's only if they have no reserve tanks and fail to patch the leak.

    1. Re:At this rate by Dalroth · · Score: 1

      And that's only if the problem doesn't get worse. It could be like that cartoon character next to the damn... one hole appears, he sticks his finger in it. Another hole appears, he sticks another finger in it.

      Unfortunately, he's only got 10 fingers...

      Bryan

    2. Re:At this rate by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
      It's easier than that, of course, because you're the other side of the dam. If it's a simple pinhole (and not a structural failing), chewing gum would probably be sufficient.

      Of course, it could be much more difficult to fix, mostly because it might be difficult to access the actual pressure-bearing skin. Or it might be a seal, in which case you'd need a lot of chewing gum.

    3. Re:At this rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No sir.. You are wrong.

      Unforunately he's only got 10 fingers and 1 penis.

    4. Re:At this rate by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, he's only got 10 fingers...

      That's funny, I have 1010 fingers.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  14. Obligatory Simpson's Reference by NightSpots · · Score: 3, Funny

    Buzz: Homer, you broke the handle.

    Race: With that hatch open, we'll burn up on re-entry! That's it: if I go, I'm taking you to hell with me.

    Homer: Wait a minute, Race. Wait a minute...wait!
    [breaks off a support rod]
    Aha! Now I'll bust that pretty face of yours!
    [tries to swing it, but it catches in the door]
    Aw, stupid bar.

    Buzz: Wait, Homer. If that bar holds, we just might make it back to earth.

    Homer: Oh. [voice rising] I'll bash you good!

  15. What a lullaby by jvarsoke · · Score: 2, Funny
    Mission Control notified astronaut Michael Foale and cosmonaut Alexander Kaleri about the leak just before their bedtime

    Oh, and before you go to sleep, one last thing. You're running out of air. Pleasant dreams.

  16. nice timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mission Control notified astronaut Michael Foale and cosmonaut Alexander Kaleri about the leak just before their bedtime

    How are they supposed to get a good night's sleep after they've just been told that their home is leaking oxygen?

    1. Re:nice timing by zurab · · Score: 1
      How are they supposed to get a good night's sleep after they've just been told that their home is leaking oxygen?


      Michael Foale to Alexander Kaleri: I don't know about you, Alexei, but I'm taking that pull-out couch on Soyuz tonight.
    2. Re:nice timing by ExtraT · · Score: 1

      "Michael Foale to Alexander Kaleri: I don't know about you, Alexei, but I'm..."

      Alexander and Alexei are two different names. The proper way would be "I don't know about you, Sasha, but I'm...."

  17. So technically... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 5, Funny

    The leak... does that suck or does that blow...?

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:So technically... by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 5, Funny


      It depends which side of the wall you're on. Sucks for the astronauts, blows for mission control.

    2. Re:So technically... by Exiler · · Score: 1

      As the pressure is higher inside the ISS than out it blows.

      --
      Banaaaana!
    3. Re:So technically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that would depend which side of the leak you're on.

    4. Re:So technically... by ResQuad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Admitedly that was hilarious. Maybe a /. comment was truly funny for once...or maybe I am just derlious. After all its after my bed time and I suffereing from a lack of oxygen (high altitudes and all)

    5. Re:So technically... by tonydiesel · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter... if they have the schwartz, they can just use it to flip the switch to the desired setting...

    6. Re:So technically... by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      After all its after my bed time and I suffereing from a lack of oxygen
      Are you on the ISS?
    7. Re:So technically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad they don't have any female astronauts on board who could suck (or is that blow)?

    8. Re:So technically... by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      It depends which side of the wall you're on. Sucks for the astronauts, blows for mission control.

      This statement is simply true (as opposed to funny). Sucking and blowing are descriptions of the same event but looked from 2 different reference points. Physics comes to mind, you know, push-pull, boat moving away from the land - or land moving away from the boat...

      But yes, in this context there is definitely something funny about this statement, can't define what though...

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  18. Could be just another dumb thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if the ISS is losing pressure wouldn't it gain a higher volume of mercury rather than lose it?

  19. Re:The problem is that the ISS is 'international' by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    And the Martians who destroyed their crafts... You don't think the probes failed all by themselves do you? ;)

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  20. Right man for the job? by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Mission Control notified astronaut Michael Foale "

    They have a leak and they bring in Mike Foale? Why do they need a motivational speaker? Or are things that bad. Further more what kind of rockets have we developed to get Cris Farley up there? Or did he go up by himself in a soyuz?

    1. Re:Right man for the job? by irokitt · · Score: 1

      It's obviously important, they brought him back from the dead!

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Right man for the job? by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      Them pulling that off might be more impressive then getting is ass into space.

    3. Re:Right man for the job? by Photar · · Score: 1

      Chris Farley is dead you incensitive clod.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    4. Re:Right man for the job? by Penguinshit · · Score: 1



      ...and make it less urgent to find the leak...

    5. Re:Right man for the job? by mgahs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Matt Foley.

      Chris Farley.

      Google is your friend. Stay in school and don't do drugs.

    6. Re:Right man for the job? by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      Foale , Foley crap! my bad

      Matt , Mike double crap! Matt's parents bad

    7. Re:Right man for the job? by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      Mike's parents bad! fuck me! I'm so stupid! I get my own corrections wrong. My life is a waste and will be spent in a van down by the river.

    8. Re:Right man for the job? by jkitchel · · Score: 1


      As long as the astronauts make it back to live in a van down by the river, he'll have done his job.

    9. Re:Right man for the job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can we please moderate you "+1 Insightful" for this?

    10. Re:Right man for the job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends whether he replied to their notification.

    11. Re:Right man for the job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Farley wouldn't be of much help, since he is dead

  21. This could put ISS on ice by fname · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, if they can't seal the leak, they'll need to send the astronauts home until Shuttle is back in service, which could be 2 years plus. Hopefully, they'll find the leak and fix it.

    One possible cause of the leak is from a meteorite impact. I have a tiny bit of experience with this from my grad school days. During the design stage of the American module, there was some concern about what would happen if there was an impact from debris. Tests showed that if the impact object was the right size, the entire damaged section could "unzip" and the and essentially blow up, likely killing the astronauts and disabling ISS. The design was tweaked, and it was showed that the section would not unzip, instead it would leak (probably not as slow as what is described, though-- think hours to reach vacuum, not months or seconds).

    I have no idea if that's what happened-- it might be a completely unrelated issue. But just wanted to point out that a tremendous variety of possible events are considered, and NASA really wants to assure that none of these could result in a catastrophic event.

    1. Re:This could put ISS on ice by fname · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hmm... shoulda Googles before making that post. Anyways, here's the #1 hit for "ISS Leak" on Google. Fairly on-topic stuff.

    2. Re:This could put ISS on ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think they've been altering the meteor (is it a meteorite if it hits something from Earth?) sensitivity by installing shields.

      Nothing fancy, just clever. Sheets of thin material installed a short distance above the outside of the station. Any high-speed object hitting the sheet will convert most of itself into hot plasma, so the station surface gets hit with a softer ball of hot gas which has already lost much kinetic energy.

      Not many shields have been installed yet. I don't know if your design included those.

    3. Re:This could put ISS on ice by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      One possible cause of the leak is from a meteorite impact. I have a tiny bit of experience with this from my grad school days.

      Bummer, dude.

      I mean, grad school's been rough for me, too, but I never get hit by meteorites.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:This could put ISS on ice by dewhite · · Score: 1

      I have a couple of friends and family that work for NASA down here in Houston. All of them say that shuttle launches should be starting back up by September 2004, barring any new organizational shift in purpose or philosophy. I think they wanna get back in the air before the election...

      --
      -dewhite
  22. Think about it... by Ummite · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pool on the roof must have a leak! ;-)

  23. Blow up some balloons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading several SciFi books in my youth which talked about releasing balloons and the like to find leaks. Extra credit if the balloon has sealant on the inside so that when it bursts trying to squeeze through the hole it takes care of the problem. Of course, you gotta hope that you have something to disolve the sealant in case it gums something up that you really need to open (think airlocks here).

  24. Slow leak, still way above Denver pressure by Fencepost · · Score: 1
    Two quotes from the article:
    "There's no action for you at this time and no immediate concerns," Mission Control assured the two men. "We'll continue to investigate this on the next shift and we may have some actions for you tomorrow."
    and
    Normal pressure inside the space station is 14.7 pounds per square inch, the same as at sea level.
    So basically they have a slow leak but they have a fair amount of time to find it.
    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
    1. Re:Slow leak, still way above Denver pressure by Fencepost · · Score: 4, Informative

      A little more detail - Denver is the "mile-high city," so figure it's at around that height. Figure sea-level air pressure at 100 kPa (14.5 psi); air pressure at 1 mile is somewhere in the area of 50 kPa (7.25 psi). At a rate of 2 mm of mercury a day they only have about a year before they reach Denver pressure, though I assume they'd want to do something about it well before that....

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
    2. Re:Slow leak, still way above Denver pressure by Dr_Banzai · · Score: 1, Informative

      Denver isn't at 50 kPa. Check a denver weather site. When i checked it was 102.5 kPa

      50 kPa is more like the top of mauna kea

    3. Re:Slow leak, still way above Denver pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully with our thin air, the returning Denver Broncos can't spread their stink as much!

    4. Re:Slow leak, still way above Denver pressure by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
      Weather sites give the pressure adjusted to sea level. That is, all weather pressures are compared with a standard day by reporting equivalent sea level pressure based on the local absolute pressure.

      For instance, when pilots set the local altimeter setting, they use sea level values given by the weather observations so the altimeter reads relative to sea level. Then the altimeter reading can be compared with the elevation on the chart in a meaningful way.

      I don't think I can say that any more clearly. (Which is too bad, because it seems pretty badly written.)

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    5. Re:Slow leak, still way above Denver pressure by isorox · · Score: 1

      Add to that the fact the leak will slow down as the pressure reduces

    6. Re:Slow leak, still way above Denver pressure by krlynch · · Score: 1

      In absolute terms, the air pressure in Denver at one mile altitude is about 83% of the air pressure at sea level (google is your friend), giving about 12.2psi, or 84kPa, or .8atm (that last one was easy :-)

    7. Re:Slow leak, still way above Denver pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 atmosphere = 760 mm of mercury = 14.7 PSI
      9 mm of mercury / 760 mm * 14.7 = 0.174 PSI...

      761 mm is low pressure... But it still gives them ample time to find the problem, on that aspect only: if the leak is caused by a nice round hole, no problem... But if it caused by a crack, then it is the symptom of a much larger (and possibly devastating) problem.

    8. Re:Slow leak, still way above Denver pressure by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Well, I live in Denver, and I think I've heard that we are roughly at .7-.8 atm, while your estimate suggests that we are closer to .5. Either way, remember that while Denver's official altitude is indeed 5,280 ft, Denver sit *next to* the mountains. 14,000 foot mountains are nearby, and they will slow you down a bit if you try and do anything athletic at that altitude without giving yourself time to adapt, but they certainly won't kill you. The guys on ISS, assuming a pretty constant rate of leak, have got plenty of time before it becomes a major concern.

  25. Uh.. light a match? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would it be too much trouble to just light a match and see where the smoke goes? It worked on Stargate: SG1!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:Uh.. light a match? by irokitt · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be a smart idea. Remember Apollo 1? Oxygen-rich environment? BOOM?

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Uh.. light a match? by Mateorabi · · Score: 1
      Uh, except now you have match smoke in the same air you are trying to breath. Also, why would anyone on the ISS have a match?

      Better use something that is light, but harder to inhale, like smallish bits of paper. Or tissue.

      Oh, and better remember to turn off any air circulating equipment. With a leak that slow, normal air scrubbers are probably going to have more effect on air currents than the leak.

      --
      "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

    3. Re:Uh.. light a match? by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      Good point, man. I remember once when I lit a match in a small room, inhaled the smoke, and died! Glad you were here to remind me!

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    4. Re:Uh.. light a match? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      A) Apollo 1 was pure O2, ISS is standard air mixture (~21% O2).

      B) Part of the reason the fire on Apollo 1 was so bad was strong convection currents. In space, there's no convection. This is why NASA didn't have a problem running flights in pure O2 once they were out of the atmosphere. (The O2 N2 mixtures in the Apollo missions were replaced with pure O2 at ~5psi as the N2 leaked away.)

    5. Re:Uh.. light a match? by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With a leak that goes at a quarter PSI/month, probably would be too much trouble. You'd probably need to turn off equipment, seal off the compartment, let the air settle for a hour or two, light the match, then watch. Oh, and you can't actually go in, or you'll create air currents that will completely mask the leak's. Even breathing would probably be plenty. So you need to do the last two stoeoesAremotely.

    6. Re:Uh.. light a match? by stor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes indeed. They need to behave in a way closer to how they do it in Sci-Fi, like Star Trek:

      1. Problem is discovered
      2. Noone on earth can possibly come up with any helpful ideas to rectify the situation
      3. A senior officer, remembering lessons learnt from camping trips with his/her/it's dad, pulls some totally unrealistic and inappropriate solution out of their arse
      4. The captain agrees with the plan, it is set in motion and by ignoring numerous breaches in the laws of physics, the damn plan works.

      Problem solved, plus as an added bonus you become a "ISS Hacker" and can put a glider on the bottom of your homepage.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    7. Re:Uh.. light a match? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Apollo 1 was pure 02 at 14psi (sea level pressure). Nobody realized that the test would have that level for quite that long a time period. In flight, the pressure in Apollo CM was 5psi pure 02.

      Note: I have just finished reading "Angle of Attack", "Failure is not an Option", and "A Man on the Moon". That's why I can spout that factoid off the top of my head.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    8. Re:Uh.. light a match? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, you know the problem is caused by Wesley's science experiment having gone awry. Just get over to his cabin and beam the damn thing out at maximum dispersion. And tell him to stick to the baking soda volcano next time.

  26. How bad is this? by Smitedogg · · Score: 1
    While the the pressure falling 9mm Hg isn't too dramatic, and wouldn't be noticable without sensors, I could see that this would be bad. But how bad exactly? If they can't find the leak soon, I'm sure they could bring more O2 up quick enough, but what if they don't find it even after that? Could the ISS be shutdown because of the added cost of O2 shipments?

    Dogg

  27. That's so stupid it isn't even wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? There's nothing to suggest that a lack of communication between international teams led to the problem, nor that the British and Japanese (and Canadian and Russian) teams aren't helping out to fix it. Problems like this happen all the time in spaceflight, even when only one nation is participating! Moreover, how the hell does this count as a debacle? Watergate was a debacle; this is a technical problem.

  28. Use the B-rate sci-fi movie trick: by Kymermosst · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just light a cigarette, and follow where the smoke goes to figure out where the leak is.

    Then, patch it with chewing gum, and have a beer (or shot of vodka) to celebrate the success.

    They do allow cigarettes, gum, and alcohol on the ISS, don't they? Of course! All of the movie space stations do!

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Use the B-rate sci-fi movie trick: by K8Fan · · Score: 1

      ...or even stupider, they could do like the characters in "Mission to Mars" and just pop open a brand name soft drink (taking care of course to hold the container in such a way to to avoid obscuring the product label). The carbonated beverage (how logical is that in zero-g anyway?) will flow towards the leak...thus assuring the sponsor gets to see their suger-water actual save the hero's life (rather than just rotting their teeth).

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    2. Re:Use the B-rate sci-fi movie trick: by Schmucky+The+Cat · · Score: 1
      No, NASA doesn't send them any alcohol.

      That's why the astronauts have long e-mail conversations with Fed prisoners - exchanging recipes for hooch.

    3. Re:Use the B-rate sci-fi movie trick: by dublin · · Score: 1

      They do allow cigarettes, gum, and alcohol on the ISS, don't they? Of course! All of the movie space stations do!

      I don't know about the other two, but I know for a fact that the Russians occasionally smoked on Mir, so the other two wouldnt surprise me at all.

      Really nasty when you realize the difficulty of airing out such a situation - it's not like you can open a window... This was one of the reasons that the only time NASA astronauts tried to avoid a flight was as the American crew member on Mir. It was apparently quite rank, and although"you got used to it", it was never pleasant - kinda like hanging around in a stinky bar for months on end.

      My source for this is not hearsay, but one of the astronauts himself that I was working with when I worked for Sun at JSC. (Well, not indirect hearsay, anyway - that particular astronaut had not flown on Mir, but was attempting to avoid such an assignment for this very reason. I left Sun shortly afterwards (mid-1997) and don't know if he was "drafted" for Mir service or not...)

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    4. Re:Use the B-rate sci-fi movie trick: by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      "They do allow cigarettes, gum, and alcohol on the ISS, don't they?"

      Actually, the cosmonauts have gotten away with pissing on the wheels of the bus that takes them to the launch pad before sneaking bottles of alcohol onto Mir. Here's a link

      -Lucas

    5. Re:Use the B-rate sci-fi movie trick: by thompson42 · · Score: 1

      Yuri Gagarin urinated on the bus tires in this fashion, and all crews launched from Baikonur since then have repeated this tradition for luck. That includes the first ISS crew, commanded by NASA astronaut Bill Shepard.

  29. Re:The problem is that the ISS is 'international' by be-fan · · Score: 1
    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  30. Need for concern??? by OneFix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can't they shut off sections of the space station...I mean, don't they have independant life support systems in multiple modules???

    It sounds kinda easy to me...find some way of sealing off a section and put the equipment in that room (if it's portable)...come back in a day...if the pressure hasn't dropped in 24 hours, you know it's not THAT module...even moreso, if it happens in more than 1 section, it might be shared systems...

    I know they probably have a better way to deal with this, but isn't there multiple backups? Wouldn't this be a good use of those backups? I just don't see the concern...they have a russian capsule that can be used as an escape pod...in the worse case, they'll just leave the station for a while...

    I've always been under the impression that they don't NEED anyone aboard the station to dock, but it helps...

    1. Re:Need for concern??? by slashdoter · · Score: 1
      I dont' think so, everything that is needed to live is stored in one module I belive, so there is only on bathroom, one fridge....some things can be ignored for 24 hours but I don't think the station is capable of just closing a part of it for a day and peeing in a cup. :)

      --
      Does anyone actually have a Java program designed to control air traffic, or for the operation of a nuclear facility?
    2. Re:Need for concern??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...and after the pressure drops and you find that you can't open the door again because of the difference in air pressure?

      Well, tape thin sheets of plastic across sections of the station and see if the air pressure change has been trapped.

  31. I can see the conversation now... by Phleg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mission Control first noticed the drop in pressure Jan. 1 and said the data showed a daily decline of about 2 millimeters of mercury.

    Mission Control: "Well guys, we have some good news and some bad news. The good news is, you're having to deal with two fewer millimeters of mercury per day."

    Astronauts: "That's good. Mercury's bad...right?" Mission Control: "Did we say mercury? We meant mercury as in 'air pressure'. G'nite!"

    --
    No comment.
    1. Re:I can see the conversation now... by Phleg · · Score: 1

      Confounded HTML...it's been around for decades and I *still* can't use it correctly.

      --
      No comment.
    2. Re:I can see the conversation now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, they've only got a couple hundred days until they're at half pressure.

  32. I think I know the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first sampling of the air preasure was taken when the astronauts inhaled -- and the second, when they exhaled.

    Its not that big of a station ya'know?

  33. soapy water.. by Suppafly · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now they just need to figure out who is going to take the soapy water outside and apply it all of the seams to find the leak.

    1. Re:soapy water.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just send them snorkeling equipment and fill the station with water.

    2. Re:soapy water.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has to be the best idea I have heard yet!

  34. There is indeed a Soyuz for emergency by znode · · Score: 5, Informative

    You remember correctly.

    "A Soyuz capsule will always be docked at the ISS, capable of carrying two people in a medical emergency, or three people in other emergencies. A crew will take a fresh Soyuz capsule to the station every six months."
    http://science.howstuffworks.com/space-station11.h tm

    1. Re:There is indeed a Soyuz for emergency by Eric+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So if they had a crew of three, in a medical emergency, they would send two back to earth in the Soyuz, leaving one crewmember on the ISS? Seems like a strange plan. As I recall, NASA was very much opposed to trying to run ISS with only a two-person crew rather than the usual three, so having only one crewmember on board would *really* seem to be pushing it.

      Of course, in an emergency, you do what you have to do.

    2. Re:There is indeed a Soyuz for emergency by TehHustler · · Score: 0

      The Soyuz capsules can seat three crewmembers, so no-one would be left behind.

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    3. Re:There is indeed a Soyuz for emergency by TehHustler · · Score: 0

      Wait, i just realised, you said a medical emergency. I had no idea such a plan existed, why would only 2 people be able to come back in a medical emergency> And what constitutes a medical emergency? obviously, anyone in a REALLY bad shape is in no way fit to come through a 4G reentry to the russian deserts...

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    4. Re:There is indeed a Soyuz for emergency by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      I believe (sorry no link) it's against flight rules to have someone on board with no escape vehicle, so if one leaves, they all leave. This is why the max potential crew size was hacked from 7 to 3 when the Crew Return Vehicle (capable of carrying 7) was scrapped.

    5. Re:There is indeed a Soyuz for emergency by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
      The Soyuz capsules can seat three crewmembers, so no-one would be left behind.
      If you didn't bother to read my posting (or the one I was replying to), why'd you bother replying?

      The original post quoted from howstuffworks.com:

      A Soyuz capsule will always be docked at the ISS, capable of carrying two people in a medical emergency, or three people in other emergencies.
      So are you suggesting that howstuffworks.com is wrong? That's obviously possible, though I would expect they would have gotten this information from a NASA publication.

      Or are you suggesting that when there is a three-person crew on ISS, there will never be a medical emergency?

    6. Re:There is indeed a Soyuz for emergency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Soyuz capsule will always be docked at the ISS, capable of carrying two people in a medical emergency, or three people in other emergencies.

      Well if "Medical Emergency" means someone died, then there's only 2 people to bring back...

    7. Re:There is indeed a Soyuz for emergency by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      As I recall, NASA was very much opposed to trying to run ISS with only a two-person crew rather than the usual three, so having only one crewmember on board would *really* seem to be pushing it.

      The funny thing with ISS is that it takes 2.5 people just to operate it (obviously that means two full-time crewmembers and one part-time). That is just to keep the station running as it should, perform regular maintenance and checks, etc. The original plan was for the ISS to have 8 aboard - 2 full time crew, 5 full time scientists and one dividing his/her time between the two. But due to cost overruns (which is why NASA should never have been allowed to work on this without adult supervision) this was cut to 3. So, we have a space station with a crew that does almost nothing but maintain the space station, they don't have the manpower for anything else!

      That is why many scientists say that the ISS is a complete waste of money.

    8. Re:There is indeed a Soyuz for emergency by TehHustler · · Score: 0

      Neither. I read the post, commented on it, then realised after re-reading that I had missed out the vital part of information in your post, hence I was correcting myself. Down boy :P

      --

      TheHustler
      http://www.elmarko.org/ - Useless bilge
      http://www.asylum-games.co.uk/ - Co-Founder
    9. Re:There is indeed a Soyuz for emergency by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

      If someone died, it could well be an emergency, but it wouldn't be a medical emergency. (It could easily be the result of a medical emergency, though.)

  35. Dammit Bruce! I told you... by djupedal · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I am highly trained Russian Astronaut! This is a very sophisticated piece of scientific equipment. Don't touch nothing!"

    1. Re:Dammit Bruce! I told you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cosmonaut

  36. Re:Manned spaceflight: Why risk it? (not for scien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1800's -- move west, why go through the trouble? (not for science)

  37. darned if they do, and darned if they don't by jdkane · · Score: 1
    Spare parts are at a premium because of the nearly yearlong [U.S.] grounding of the space shuttle fleet, the result of the Columbia tragedy.

    When the U.S. goes into space the astronauts seem to get into trouble. So the U.S. grounds the fleet. Now it seems probable that if the U.S. doesn't go into space, then the astronauts might be in trouble. Seems ironic. However I hope other nations, maybe the Russians will send help if need be.
    This might be a good reason for Pres. Bush to start up the astronaut space program again. Those politicians are always looking for a reason.

    1. Re:darned if they do, and darned if they don't by SWPadnos · · Score: 1

      This might be a good reason for Pres. Bush to start up the astronaut space program again. Those politicians are always looking for a reason.

      Bush would never do that - there's no oil in space, so there's no need to go there.

      --
      - The Sigless Wonder
  38. Re:Manned spaceflight: Why risk it? (not for scien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think what happens is this kind of space effort MUST be commercialised. With the massive resources a commercial enterprise could put behind something like ISS, it has to be better than space agencies with no clear goals (hello cold war) to proceed forward.

    At the moment, NASA is pretty aimless. There's no direction. Put a commercial group behind the ISS and there's market competition right there

  39. I guess I know where it is! by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Obviously: at ".." (parent directory) handling!

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  40. Ways to find the leak by digitaltraveller · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Noise detection equipment.
    2) Take up smoking - use a modified bong to prevent excessive discharge of ash.

    1. Re:Ways to find the leak by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      2) Take up smoking - use a modified bong to prevent excessive discharge of ash.
      3) Use weed to prevent nicotine organism poisoning.
      4) Run live video from the station on TV, get paid for commercials time
      5) PROFIT!

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:Ways to find the leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w00t guess all that time in college making bongs will pay off after all

    3. Re:Ways to find the leak by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't count on it.
      NASA will commission a $1bln bong project from an expert company just to get one that gets nose going up your nose.

      BTW, a very interesting project: a bong that works without gravity!

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:Ways to find the leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err, water up your nose.

    5. Re:Ways to find the leak by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      NASA will commission a $1bln bong project from an expert company just to get one that gets nose going up your nose.

      Yeah, but if this was the movies, one of the astronauts would be a MacGuyver Smoker and it would go something like this:

      MacGyver Smoker: "Alright, then get me an avacado, an ice pick, and my snorkel. Trust me bro, I've made bongs with less. Hurry up."

    6. Re:Ways to find the leak by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Noise detection might be interesting. I didn't think of that.

      The leak is awfully slow, though. I really doubt that they're going to be able to pick it up with smoke.

  41. boat commercial by magical22 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am not sure if this will work, but when I think of a leak I think of that boat commercial where he has a big leak and his female companion uses a tampon to plug the hole, although there aren't any female's currently on board maybe one of them left some behind.

  42. Insane american units by Dion · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Argh, I hate these insane units that you guys keep using, mmHg? psi? let's have it in SI units like
    pascal

    --
    -- To dream a dream is grand, but to live it is divine. -- Leto ][
    1. Re:Insane american units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and by american, you of course mean english imperial, right?

    2. Re:Insane american units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by Americans the poster is refearing to the gods that pwn this world.

  43. I'm an astro-nut by Dalroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm an astro-nut. If I could control where most of my taxed income went, I'd almost certainly have it tunnelled off to Air Force black projects, NASA and science education.

    That being said, the ISS has long since become a turkey. It's time to cut that thing loose and build us something usefull. In particular, real telescopes that will let real science be done. This space station is nothing more than a big money black hole.

    I'd much rather have a space based inferometer placed at one of the Earth's lagrange points. We could learn a lot from something like that! What are we learning from ISS? Russia has no money... nobody else will cooperate with us... people can't stay up in space for a long time (hello mir?) and our space program is woefully inadequate. Great. Billions of dollars for this? I could've told you this years ago...

    Bryan

    1. Re:I'm an astro-nut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd much rather have a space based inferometer placed at one of the Earth's lagrange points.

      There's already a multi-satellite microwave interferometer orbiting the planet. What research did you have in mind?

    2. Re:I'm an astro-nut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . nobody else will cooperate with us..

      I think you mean, The other nations aren't doing what we tell them so we're going to take our ball and going to play somewhere else.

    3. Re:I'm an astro-nut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're efficient.

    4. Re:I'm an astro-nut by Scorchio · · Score: 1

      You've just reminded me of a book I read recently.. The Light of Other Days by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter.

      Set in the near future, part of the scene-setting describes a speck streaking across the sky as remains of the ISS, a project abandoned some time after a catastrophic space shuttle accident hindered progress. A little spooky, for a book published in January 2001.

      The book goes on to describe how the UK was forced to withdraw from the EU due to the economic constraints imposed preventing the government from doing anything to help a severe recession. Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland go their separate ways, the royal family head off to Australia and England becomes the newest state in the USA. Curiously, none of this seems too far-fetched, either!

      The story follows the development - and the people behind the development - of cameras that use wormhole technology ("WormCams") to allow people to see anywhere and eventually at any time. It's quite a good book, although it gets a bit weird towards the end!

    5. Re:I'm an astro-nut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, for a space-based interferometer, you'd probably want to put it at least 2 Lagrange points. Just putting it at one doesn't give you much over an orbital platform, except for the usual advantages of putting any type of telescope at a Lagrange point. However, taking advantage of the relative stability of the Lagrange points, you could place two telescopes at two points, which would then maintain a relatively fixed relationship with each other, and work as a really big interferometer. The light gathering ability would be a PITA, though. Also, you'd still need to compensate for motion around the Lagrange points.

  44. Place your bets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anyone know the over/under of how long it'll be before MoveOn.org has a commercial blaming Bush for this?

    1. Re:Place your bets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I'm done fisting your mother. FAG.

    2. Re:Place your bets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    3. Re:Place your bets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      MoveOn.org

      Hey, Thanks for the link!.
      Interesting stuff on that site :)
    4. Re:Place your bets... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 1
      The article will start out something like:
      First, there was leak-gate where a CIA operative was outed by a staffer in the Bush White House.

      Now we have Leak-gate 2.0. Leaks in outer space. Why coudn't Bush have just left well enough alone? Nasa doesn't need any more problems, Dubya! Especially after you pushed the top secret self destruct button thats under your desk in the Oval Office, just so your home state could get some press coverage when peices of Columbia came raining down almost a year ago. You shoulda left that button connected the way Clinton had it, to call in the interns.

      Where is Bin Laden?

      The capture of Saddam Hussein DOES NOT make the world any safer...

      And on, and on, and on....

      --
      Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  45. Not the only problem on the station right now.. by ironwill96 · · Score: 1

    I was watching NASA TV earlier today before the news conference at 12:00 P.M. EST and they were discussing a problem with the ISS. Apparently, the main oxygen generating component is not functioning correctly right now either, and the astronauts are relying on oxygen generating canisters. They are said to have enough backup canisters to last for months, not counting the ones on the Progress supply ship currently docked. The person on Nasa TV said that more canisters and hopefully replacement parts would be shipped up on the next Progress supply ship.

    It amazes me how calm NASA sounds when talking about problems like these. Perhaps they have just been hiring lots of really good media spinsters from Russia lately: "Pieces of Mir disintegrating in the atmosphere will not be a problem at all. In fact, if one falls on your house, its a great souvenir we'll let you keep for free!"

    --
    "To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield." - Tennyson
  46. TERRORISTS DID IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously this was clearly the work of Osama Bin Laden and his band of thieves. Osama used Sadam's old rockets to launch a rock at the ISS and now it's sprung a leak. Thank god we liberated those terrorists.

  47. Watch out for that hand... by Stonent1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mission Control notified astronaut Michael Foale and cosmonaut Alexander Kaleri about the leak just before their bedtime

    You know, Alexander, this may be our last night alive together..
    Uh huh.
    Well... There's been something I've been meaning to ask you...
    Uhm... Ok?
    I've noticed... When you're alone in the shower... Uh... You look so lonely...as the water slowly rolls down your back...cheeks glistening in the glow of the fluorescent light.
    Get off me freak!

    1. Re:Watch out for that hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hello, Sir! My name is Abdullah Kumr, I am a terrorist.Please HELP ME KILL ALL AMERICANS!!! My father was on the first plane that crashed in the WTC.
      I get a boner every time CNN plays that tape.

      If you wish to help me in my quest for WORLD SLAVERY, please purchase a kalashnikov at your nearest kalashnikov store and HELP ME KILL ALL AMERICANS!!!

    2. Re:Watch out for that hand... by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      I cannot believe this has not already happened at least a few times. Over 400 hundred people have been sent into space with a large portion of them being sent up for extended stays. I think the odds speak for themselves.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    3. Re:Watch out for that hand... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      The ISS doesn't have a shower.

    4. Re:Watch out for that hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, please do help.

    5. Re:Watch out for that hand... by hmallett · · Score: 1
      as the water slowly rolls down your back

      Not in zero-gravity...
    6. Re:Watch out for that hand... by JackCroww · · Score: 1

      We've been sending dismembered people into space?

      --
      "Ayn Rand is a bloody socialist compared to me." - Robert A. Heinlein
    7. Re:Watch out for that hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      but of course the water wouldnt run down his back, there is no gravity
      </pedant>

    8. Re:Watch out for that hand... by Suidae · · Score: 1

      There is gravity, they are just in free-fall at terminal velocity.

    9. Re:Watch out for that hand... by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      So close, but so stupid. ^_^

      Terminal Velocity is the speed at which air resistance is equal to the gravitational force, so the velocity is constant. In space, there's basically no air resistance, so Terminal Velocity would be obscenely fast. What they've got is an orbit, which is different. Gravity is changing their velocity at such a rate so that its location over time is more-or-less periodic.

      But yes, you've got an important point there. Gravity is there, but everything's accelerating at the same rate, so you don't feel it.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  48. Funny Guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We're going to call it a night and make sure we don't misplace the leak equipment," Foale said with a chuckle.

    Anyone remember that Tool song?

  49. I knew it.. by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Commander: What's That hissing Noise

    Crew: We hear nothing sir!

    Commander: You're all deaf I tell ya!

    Crew: Puzzled

    Crew: Sir we just got a message from mission control seems were deaf.. were leaking air.

    Commander: Got any copies of spaceballs? I need to find out where they purchase those cans from.

    1. Re:I knew it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are very stupid.

  50. Another overlooked problem? by Wister285 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I remember there was a Slashdot story a few days/weeks ago where the ISS crew heard a loud thud. They said there was nothing to worry about, but I think it is possible that this could turn into another Columbia style foam incident. Luckily though, this crew should be able to escape in time if there ever were a problem.

    1. Re:Another overlooked problem? by Macrobat · · Score: 1

      Yep, they should be able to get these guys off the ISS before it burns up on re-entry.

      --
      "Hardly used" will not fetch you a better price for your brain.
    2. Re:Another overlooked problem? by Photar · · Score: 1

      Fortunatly for them they don't have to try and land the space station.

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
  51. Units? by Aardpig · · Score: 1

    As of Monday, the pressure had declined a total of nine millimeters. That is equivalent to about one-quarter of a pound per square inch, said NASA spokesman James Hartsfield.

    Hasn't NASA yet learned that mixing units can lead to very bad things

    Silly fact: 1.7446551e-40 is Planck's constant in British Thermal Unit-hours.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  52. your anus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    <rim job>

  53. No its just Christmass Cookies by goombah99 · · Score: 0
    I figure they each put on five or ten pounds over the christmass holiday---no doubt thatdocked cargo ship had a gallon of eggnog in it.

    To create that fat, they would have to consume oxygen from the air which might look like a leak.

    or maybe I'm full of crap.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  54. It blows, which sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It blows, which sucks... at the gives location.

  55. Re:Manned spaceflight: Why risk it? (not for scien by Quirk · · Score: 1

    Think the pyramids, think Stonehenge... we as a species and as respective cultures have always had inklings to write our name large, to create works the scale of which rivals the heavens. Sure it's science but it's also the beginning of a hopefully universal effort on the part of all the peoples of the world to come together...sounds mary poppinish but still...we could of course feed the hungry

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  56. Don't joke by hayden · · Score: 1
    Apparently there's a Martian cell these days.

    Either that or NASA wants in on some anti-terrorism funding.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    1. Re:Don't joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is, quite honestly the worst joke new site I have ever seen.

    2. Re:Don't joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you expect humor from the UK?

      the only time they make anyone laugh is when they put on military uniforms.

  57. ITYM half a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your numbers are off. Normal sea-level pressure is 760mm Hg. If they lose 2mm/day, after a year they'll only have 30mm Hg left, which, according to the Google calculator, is 0.58 PSI.

    1. Re:ITYM half a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent use of goggle calc!

  58. Re:Manned spaceflight: Why risk it? (not for scien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay! and we could get all the wonderful results we've seen worldwide when medical care, public transport, telephone systems and garbage disposal were commercialised.

    Boy I can't wait until the ISS gets THOSE benefits.

  59. Simple non-wastefull solution by ehiris · · Score: 2, Funny

    Take a leak in the room where the air pressure is at the lowest, follow stream, apply duct tape at the spot where the fluids have left the room.
    After that resume hanging out in weightlessness until the next problem.

    1. Re:Simple non-wastefull solution by krray · · Score: 1

      As I've said many times to my wife before, "see duct tape _can_ fix everything".

      Ripped chair floor mat? Duct tape!
      Broken tail light? Duct tape!
      Mail box door hanging off? Duct tape!
      Ripped a whole in that cushion? Duct tape!
      Wife nagging a bit too much and can't close her mouth? Duct tape!
      I did try it for a leaky tire, but @ 90mph it kept flying off...

      If it's good enough to NASA ... then it's good enough for me.

    2. Re:Simple non-wastefull solution by core+plexus · · Score: 2, Funny
      "I did try it for a leaky tire, but @ 90mph it kept flying off..."

      Then you need what we used in the Army: '100 mile an hour tape.' Just be careful what you stick it to.

      -cp-

      Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets

    3. Re:Simple non-wastefull solution by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Then you need what we used in the Army: '100 mile an hour tape.' Just be careful what you stick it to.

      Yeah... it's great stuff. My dad was a bush pilot, water bomber, and aircraft maintenance engineer in the Arctic and northern Canada, which meant that he'd fly and fix things like Twin Otters, Single Otters, Beavers, Bell Jet Rangers, etc.

      He's got some hilarious pics and stories about how he'd be flown in to recover a damaged aircraft in the middle of nowhere (like between an airfield and an oil rig in the Northwest Territories), with the original pilot thinking "we're screwed". In a number of cases, as with skin punctures, etc., he would use 100MPH tape to patch the damage and fly it back to the shop for proper repairs.

      They really do call it 100MPH tape for a reason... it comes off at 100MPH!

      In some cases, the temporary fix would be scary enough that the original pilot would refuse to fly back in the damaged aircraft.

      Ahhh... the Good Old Days....

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    4. Re:Simple non-wastefull solution by Oswald · · Score: 1
      This is totally inappropriate, but I can't hear about 100-mile-an-hour tape without thinking of a story a friend once told me. While she was in the Air Force, a guy she was dating invited her to participate in "100-mile-an-hour fuck". Having no idea what she was saying yes to (but probably thinking it would involve a moving vehicle), she went ahead anyway, and this is what he did: After they shucked their clothes, he put a strip of the tape on her back, then he laid on his back and had her get on top. Things proceeded as usual for while, with the expected rise in intensity until, finally--just as she was climaxing--he reached around to her back and yanked off the tape.

      She described it as "intense" and "unique", but I don't think she ever asked for a repeat. I'm sorry to say I've never had the nerve to try it with anybody myself, but feel free to borrow this and let us all know how it works out.

    5. Re: Simple non-wastefull solution by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > ake a leak in the room where the air pressure is at the lowest, follow stream, apply duct tape at the spot where the fluids have left the room.

      Or just leave the leak and redesignate the module as "the fart room".

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:Simple non-wastefull solution by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I did try it for a leaky tire, but @ 90mph it kept flying off...

      It also helps to pull over to the side of the road before attempting to patch the tire.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  60. air is invisible, my hat is crinkly and shiny by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Air is invisible, even when it is surrounded by (practically) nothing, like in space - TO HUMANS. Well, now we've caught you investigating the hole the Martian uwave laser made in the ISS passing over Florida, blocking the beam busy reprogramming the voting machines. Just you wait until Spirit smokes you critters out of your Martian spiderholes and tries you for crimes against humanity, you illegal aliens!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  61. I see the problem: No Engineers by Shut+the+fuck+up! · · Score: 2, Informative

    Reporter: It's a lovely day for a launch, here, live at Cape Canaveral, at the lower end of the Florida Peninsula, and the purpose of today's mission is truly, really electrifying.

    Other reporter: That's correct, Tom. The lion's share of this flight will be devoted to the study of the effects of weightlessness on tiny screws.

    Reporter: Unbelievable, and just imagine the logistics of weightlessness. And of course, this could have literally millions of applications here on Earth -- everything from watchmaking to watch repair.

    Reporter: Now let's look at the crew a little.

    Other reporter: They're a colorful bunch. They've been dubbed, "The Three Musketeers". Heh heh heh.

    Reporter: And we laugh legitimately. There's a mathematician, a different kind of mathematician, and a statistician.

    1. Re:I see the problem: No Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't know if you're quoting, but that's really, really good reporterese!

    2. Re:I see the problem: No Engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's quoting a Simpsons episode. The same one its parent was quoting.

    3. Re:I see the problem: No Engineers by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      If we're going to be mindlessly quoting that episode dare I say that I have a quote from it that is the best and most mindless of them all?

      Kent: We're just about to get our first pictures from inside the spacecraft with "average-naut" Homer Simpson, and we'd like to-- Aah!

      [Camera shows a close-up of an ant floating in front of the three astronauts]

      Kent: Ladies and gentlemen, er, we've just lost the picture, but, uh, what we've seen speaks for itself. The Corvair spacecraft has been taken over -- "conquered", if you will -- by a master race of giant space ants. It's difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive earth men or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain, there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here.

      Kent: (Turns to camera, puts on a happier face) And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  62. It certainly blows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Riker: "They were just sucked into space!" Data: "Blown, sir" Riker: "Sorry, Data." Data: "Common mistake, sir."

  63. Pushed off course? by state*less · · Score: 1

    Could this leak be pushing the iss off course? Maybe it won't throw it completely out of the solar system, but it'll be close!

    Me

  64. I'm no rocket scientist, by cyberworm · · Score: 1

    but has anyone considered that maybe the pressure indiactor is faulty? How many are there, and if multiple, are they independantly controlled? How is the system calibrated, and is it possible to re-calibrate it? I'm just curious, since no one has brought it up in anything I've read so far.

    1. Re:I'm no rocket scientist, by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Or have they looked at the amount of gas in the storage tanks? Seriously, if there were a leak, you'd think they'd notice the extra gas usage. With all the sensors and remote monitoring I'd think this would be an automated alert.

      NASA's monitoring, saftey and planning people may need to be sat down and slapped really soon. There's just WAY too many "simple" things they keep missing. Or perhaps this is another issue that's been lost in a PowerPoint presentaion?

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  65. Re:Manned spaceflight: Why risk it? (not for scien by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It just wouldn't be the same with darn rats and monkeys...

  66. Grow a brain you troll... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Informative

    God, your post is so ignorant that I have to wonder why you bothered composing it.

    1. No "international" = no "space station".

    If there hadn't been international cooperation, we wouldn't have a space station in orbit right now. Compared to the Russians, what NASA knew about space stations could be written on a postage stamp.

    Lest you forget, Skylab wasn't exactly a screaming success (heck, one of its solar panels failed to deploy: you could hardly call that an auspicious start). Its longest period of occupancy was 84 days and it was deployed as one unit and nothing like as modular as the ISS.

    On the other hand, Mir far outlived its operational life (and would have done so by an even greater margin if the bean counters hadn't tried to cut so many corners), and was occupied almost constantly for 15 years. During that time, docked with 31 spacecraft, 64 cargo vessels, 9 shuttle missions visited it and it was home to 125 cosmonauts/astronauts from 12 different countries. It was, of course, modular, like the ISS. Oh, and before Mir, the Russians also had the Salyut series of space stations up and running throughout the 1970s and 1980s.

    When Russia came on board, the ISS gained a lot of expertise; the sort of expertise that money just can't buy. If you think you can find one person at NASA who thinks that putting up a space station as complex and as expensive as the ISS could have been done by the US alone then you're deluding yourself.

    2. NASAs main partners in the ISS are Canada, ESA, Russia and Japan, but most of their modules have yet to be deployed.

    There is no "British" space agency involvement in the ISS. However, there is ESA (European Space Agency, of which Britain plays a very small role) involvement in the ISS. This involvement includes the Columbus Laboratory, the Automated Transfer Vehicle, Nodes 2 and 3, the European Robotic Arm, and the Data Management System for the Russian Service Module. However, most (if not all) of these elements have yet to be deployed, so I fail to see how they can be responsible for a pressure leak when they're sitting on the ground.

    The same is true for the Japanese involvement, the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM) also known as Kibo, which is currently undergoing testing at the Kennedy Space Centre prior to launch. Sorry to break it to you, but if their module isn't up there, I can't see how you can hope to "share the blame for this latest debacle" with the Japanese either.

    By the way, the single biggest contractor on the ISS is Boeing. Last time I checked, Boeing was an American company.

    3. A "sole space agency" is in charge. It's name is NASA.

    The ISS may be international, but NASA is its lead partner. All others play second fiddle to it and that's never been in doubt. If there's someone "in charge of making sure everything [runs] right" that someone is NASA.

    So that's D'oh!, D'oh! and thrice D'oh!

    Seriously, if you could get off your xenophobic high horse for a second (and get some basic facts right too) then perhaps you might have a point (ie, that someone screwed up, again) albeit a rather weak one. But trying to turn this story into a "USA rules, rest of you just suck" gloat is pathetic, particularly when you're so off-base.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "If there hadn't been international cooperation, we wouldn't have a space station in orbit right now"

      The only way that "international cooperation" helped get ISS in orbit was that turning it into a welfare program for Russian space engineers rather than a space station stopped it being cancelled a few years back. In terms of building and operating a useful space station, "international cooperation" has been a huge problem, by forcing it into a stupid orbit just so the Russians can launch to it... if it had been designed as a real space station rather than a welfare program it would have been put into an orbit to optimise launches from KSC and the ESA site, not Russia.

      "Lest you forget, Skylab wasn't exactly a screaming success"

      Skylab achieved everything it was designed to do: I call that a success. From what I hear the astronauts on ISS spend so much time fixing things they rarely get around to doing anything useful (if there is actually anything useful to do other than keeping the Russian space engineers in vodka and cabbage).

      "it was deployed as one unit and nothing like as modular as the ISS"

      And it was probably cheaper to launch an entire new Skylab than to launch a single ISS module. AFAIR follow-on Skylab missions were one of the things that NASA sacrificed to help justify spending more money on the shuttle.

    2. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the moment the **only** method the Americans have of getting people into space is to hitch a ride with the Russians. So much for America going it alone.

    3. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Hardly a problem given that NASA couldn't justify ISS on its own merits, only as a way to funnel money to Russia.

    4. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by balbord · · Score: 1

      "to optimise launches from KSC"...

      And how, exactly, would USA reach ISS? With this? Maybe this instead?

      --
      "If I have been able to see so far, It is because I went out and bought a damn binoculars" - Ze da Esquina
    5. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      NASA can't justify the existance of the space shuttle without the ISS (the space shuttle just plain sucks for launching sattelites, and all science experiments worth doing on it have already been done). So, without the ISS there would probably be no manned space flight for NASA. Some might argue though that this would be a good thing, since it's becoming painfully obvious that until we have a destination to send humans to (the main purpose of the ISS as it stands), we shouldn't be sending them up.

    6. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by gorilla · · Score: 1
      "Lest you forget, Skylab wasn't exactly a screaming success"

      Skylab achieved everything it was designed to do: I call that a success.

      Also, the only reason that it deorbited at the time it did, instead of lasting as long as Mir did was because of NASA not being able to get the shuttle launched on time. If they'd keep with BDB then they'd have had the capacity to reboost it's orbit instead of letting it reenter.

    7. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Well, if they'd kept the Saturns it would almost certainly have been easier to launch a new one: Skylab had a limited lifespan because it couldn't readily be resupplied and waste was stored onboard and couldn't be dumped out... things you couldn't really fix in orbit. The only reason they planned on rescuing it with the shuttle was because they no longer had the capability to launch a new one.

    8. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by ExtraT · · Score: 1

      "And it was probably cheaper to launch an entire new Skylab than to launch a single ISS module."

      The only reason why Skylab existed at all is that there was some leftover hardware from the moon program, most notably a Saturn V rocket. US had, and still has no other rocket capable of launching anything like Skylab - the ISS modules are considerably smaller. So, this talk of launching more Skylabs is noncense.

    9. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except if the ISS had been in a better orbit, Columbia would have been able to reach it, and we might not have lost 7 astronauts last year. Something to think about.

    10. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by gorilla · · Score: 1
      The consumables were resupplied, the first manned mission (Skylab 2) only brought replacement medical supplies, as there was concerns over the onboard supplies spoiling in the high temperatures. The second manned mission (Skylab 3) brought 3 extras days of food, and various supplies to replace those found to have spoiled, eg the hygiene packs. However the last manned mission (Skylab 4) brough along "thousands of items needed for their lengthy manned period", including replacement coolant.

      I think it's better to say Skylab wasn't resupplied, rather than it couldn't be.

      Trash was definatly a problem, because there wasn't really a way to empty the trash containers. However, that doesn't mean that they couldn't have shifted to the Mir/ISS technique of using uncrewed cargo modules which are filled with trash before being released.

    11. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When Russia came on board, the ISS gained a lot of expertise; the sort of expertise that money just can't buy. If you think you can find one person at NASA who thinks that putting up a space station as complex and as expensive as the ISS could have been done by the US alone then you're deluding yourself."

      Um, no. Plenty of folks at NASA disagreed VEHEMENTLY with putting the Russians in the critical path for the construction of ISS.

    12. Re:Grow a brain you troll... by thompson42 · · Score: 1

      You're blaming the loss of Columbia on the orbit chosen for the ISS???

      1) The reason Columbia could not rendezvous with the ISS is not because the ISS is in some kind of undesirable orbit. The reason is that the shuttle was launched into an orbit from which it could not reach the ISS. The shuttle has a limited capability to change its orbit, and it wasn't enough to move into the same orbit as the ISS. You may have noticed some discussion since the tragedy about launching shuttles only to the ISS, save for Hubble repair missions.

      2) The whole question of orbits presupposes that Mission Control would have chosen to have Columbia rendezvous with the ISS, if possible. This is obviously not true. The flight director Linda Hamm (shades of Larry Mulloy - "prove to me it isn't safe") made it clear that she saw no issue with the foam impact. There was never a chance that Houston would have ordered that rendezvous. Any such discussion is only Monday-morning quarterbacking (or hindsight, for our non-American readers).

  67. Chinese Space Program.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Too bad the Chinese space progam isn't farther along. If the docking connectors could mate, perhaps they could have sent up oxygen and tools.

    It is, after all, the International space station, why should America and Russia be the only two to deploy supplies. The political relationship between China and the USA could always use a little bolstering.

  68. Balloons, JB Weld and Duct tape by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

    Deploy a few inflated balloons to find the leak then seal it with some JB Weld and duct tape. :)

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  69. BALLOONS...! by jxliv7 · · Score: 1
    .

    the way I remember they found leaks in old sci-fi stories was to inflate balloons with air and a gob of leak sealant and set them adrift.

    sooner or later the airflow would pull the balloon right to the leak, pop! problem solved.

    ain't physics wonderful...

    1. Re:BALLOONS...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on how much noise there is up there they should be able to hear it. Gases dropping pressure emit ultrasonic energy. Just listen with the right equipment.
      A friend set up ultrasonic mikes to snag the kids putting graffiti on his shop's wall.

  70. Netcraft Confirms:ISS is Dying by FannyMinstrel · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is official; Netcraft confirms: ISS is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered ISS community when NASA confirmed that ISS atmosphere has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 95% percent of all atmospheres. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that ISS has lost more atmosphere , this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. ISS is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by falling dead last in the recent "Space Stations: What's hot and what's not".

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict ISS's future. The hand writing is on the wall: ISS faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for ISS because ISS is dying. Things are looking very bad for ISS. As many of us are already aware, ISS continues to lose atmosphere.

    All major surveys show that ISS has steadily declined in cool factor. ISS is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If ISS is to survive at all it will be among russian dilettante dabblers. ISS continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, ISS is dead.

    Fact: ISS is dying

  71. This is easy to fix by deadgoon42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just cut the air vents for a couple of hours, chuck some M&M's in the air and see where they go. Then just slap some silicon adhesive in there.. it'll hold

    --

    Smeghead every day of the week.
  72. You're absolutely right by Fencepost · · Score: 3, Informative

    I did screw up the numbers, and it is around half a year. I was working in kPa and did the conversion from 1mm Hg to kPa but forgot to double the result.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
    1. Re:You're absolutely right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You work for NASA, right?

    2. Re:You're absolutely right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darn - I was *soooo* going to say that!

    3. Re:You're absolutely right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice that these units (mm Hg, Pa) are all metric. Everyone likes to rag on the English-to-metric conversion, but it's just as easy to screw up while staying all metric, thanks to the plethora of arbitrary units named after random scientists.

  73. To help clarify the situation... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Informative

    One atmosphere at sea level equates to 760mm of mercury. So a 2mm drop is a 0.26 percent drop in atmospheric pressure, assuming the atmospheric pressure of the ISS is set to that of sea level.

    (I have no data on the standard operating atmospheric pressure of the ISS. Perhaps someone else can supply that so we can make a more direct measurement of the percentage fall.)

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:To help clarify the situation... by monstermagnet · · Score: 1

      From the AP:
      As of Monday, the pressure had declined a total of nine millimeters over five days. That is equivalent to about one-fifth of a pound per square inch, Hartsfield said. Normal pressure inside the space station is 14.7 pounds per square inch, the same as at sea level.

  74. Did anyone see Armageddon? by graveyardduckx · · Score: 0

    Was this because of that crazy Russian beating on something with a wrench? "American components, Russian components. ALL MADE IN TAIWAN!" Go ahead, mod me down, but I still thought it was appropriate. :-)

    1. Re:Did anyone see Armageddon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats even more amazing about this, is that about 10 other people already posted the same thing.

      So, please, mod parent done to "Retarded +5"

  75. Gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch ... in about 3 days, they will say the problem was resolved. What they will fail to mention, is that the air preasure returned to its proper level when the silly Russian farted.

  76. They shouldn't be worried by wingnut2600 · · Score: 1

    Eventually the pressure will regulate itself. Unfortunately the astronauts will then find their insides now on the outside.

    It seems to me that if I were in an enclosed vessel orbiting the Earth I would want to find that leak as quickly as possible. The nonchalance of NASA and the astronauts given in the article seems a little questionable. I wonder if the trapped people are capable of sleeping before finding the leak. I think that this sort of vague fear would creep up on even the hardened astronauts.

    My suggestion for the astronauts is similar to finding a puncture in a rubber raft; one of the them should go on a spacewalk and spray soapy water on the outside of the ISS and look for bubbles

  77. Re:ISS DOES HAVE A LEAK... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ISS. What is it all about... is it good, or is it whack?

  78. Low tech solution. by Photar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Spray the inside of it with fix-a-flat and spin it around.

    --
    He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
  79. Pretty simple... by shachart · · Score: 4, Funny

    Until the leak is found and resolved, all the astronauts need to keep the air pressure up is eat some beans...

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
    1. Re:Pretty simple... by mbstone · · Score: 1

      Then, go outside and sniff for the leak....

  80. A lot like a flat tire, huh? by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 2, Funny

    This looks like a job for:

    Bicycle Repairman!

    1. Re:A lot like a flat tire, huh? by tengwar · · Score: 1

      Either that, or we look for a convicted Scout on the loose.

  81. AYB Oh come on.. you had to expect it! by inertialmatrix · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yeah, it's an obligatory AYB reference... you know you like it.


    In A.D. 2004
    Trouble Was Brewing Right Before Bedtime

    Operator: Main screen turn on.
    Captain: It's You!!
    Cats: How are you gentlemen!!
    Cats: All your AIR are belong to us.
    Cats: You are on the way to destruction.
    Captain: What you say!!
    Cats: You have no chance to survive make your time.
    Cats: Ha Ha Ha Ha ....




    Awww, you know you love me.
    Insight.matrixFlux.com

  82. What's wrong in this picture? by niker · · Score: 1

    * NASA, milimeters, pounds, inches. *

    All from the news article posted.

    I know what's wrong :)

    --
    Moderators: Don't agree? pray tell why.
  83. space.com is also reporting it by treebeard77 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mission Control Alerts Station Crew to Slow Air Leak By Marcia Dunn AP Aerospace Writer posted: 08:00 pm ET 05 January 2004

  84. Another units fiasco by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    As of Monday, the pressure had declined a total of nine millimeters. That is equivalent to about one-quarter of a pound per square inch, said NASA spokesman James Hartsfield."

    1 atmosphere = 14.7 psi = 760 mmHg
    => 9 mmHg = 9/760*14.7 psi = .174 psi

    If NASA is rounding .174 to .25. no wonder they keep crashing.

    Remember the Mars Climate Orbiter where one team used English units and the other used metric? Or is this one of those "Volkswagens per Library of Congress" things that journalists use because they think the public is innumerate?

  85. Pepsi to the rescue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spill (rather hard since it's 0 Gs) some Pepsi around the ship, see where it gets sucked out at and patch it.

  86. Lack of privacy... by Goonie · · Score: 1

    I dunno, but I gather that in all spacecraft up to the ISS there simply wasn't room to get any privacy, and in the spacecraft with two-person crews there simply isn't room, period.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Lack of privacy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where there's a will, there's an orgy.

  87. You know they are in trouble when... by kilocomp · · Score: 1

    The next Ask Slashdot is "How do you find a leak in an international space station"

    Of course we all know what the answers will be:
    - Use google you lazy bastards
    - Linux already does this
    - Forget about it, leaks are not important
    - See, I told you Microsoft sucks

  88. On Slashdot In Space, no one is laughing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I know the sure fire way to send me off to sweet dreams is to sing me a lulliby about how when I wake up in the morning, I might not because all the air is gone.

    "Sleep tight guys. Remember, breathe shallow. I'll have my kids say an extra Lord's Prayer for ya. Hey, maybe Tom Hanks and Sean Connery will play you guys in the movie."

  89. Re:Manned spaceflight: Why risk it? (not for scien by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    The major reason to have humans in space is to eventually get some of our eggs out of this basket.

    The solution to taxpayer expense is simple: Remove the government monopoly on space launches.

  90. I.S. for I.S.S. :o) by davFr · · Score: 1

    "[...]one-quarter of a pound per square inch[...]"

    Can't smart people from NASA use standart units, like kilogram, meters and weird stuff like that??

    It's called I.S. too: International System of units!

    --
    RIP Slashdot. I used to love you. dead account - but slashdot wont let me delete it.
  91. In Other news by draxredd · · Score: 0

    American Space Station may have a leak.

    --
    --- Back to the trees, back to the trees !
  92. mind bending! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOW.. this is really mind bending dude. So when I blow a fart, I suck poop.. Cool.

  93. Equivalent? by 26199 · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to Google, 9mm of mercury is 1200 Pascals, whereas 0.25psi is 1700 Pascals.

    1. Re:Equivalent? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      That is what you get for expressing pressure in millimeters mercury... of course that should have been sixteenths of an inch of mercury, to be NASA unit-compatible.

    2. Re: Equivalent? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > According to Google, 9mm of mercury is 1200 Pascals, whereas 0.25psi is 1700 Pascals.

      How many Cobols does that work out to?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  94. Leaks by Look+Sir,+Droids! · · Score: 1

    I hope they find the astronaut that was responsible for this leak, because I would love to see him frog-marched out of the ISS.

  95. Dr Pepper! by chendo · · Score: 1, Informative

    There's a movie I saw on AXN recently called "Mission to Mars" or something like that. There was a huge leak on their ship, and one of the guys squeezed some Dr Pepper out of it's packet and watched it go towards the hole.

    The only problem is it was a large leak, whereas the one on the station is a slow one, and this idea may not work.

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
  96. No by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    They just need to demodulate the primary power coupling so they can use it to create an inverse antitachyon pulse.

    Christ, don't you know anything?

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    1. Re:No by jejagua · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking more along the lines of an atmospheric containment field. Where's Geordi?

      --
      http://www.techyrants.com
    2. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. If you reverse the polarity, it. just. might. work.

    3. Re:No by stor · · Score: 1

      > They just need to demodulate the primary power coupling so they can use it to create an inverse antitachyon pulse.

      demodulate the primary power coupling? I thought you had to "remodulate" it, which happens to have an 85% chance of disrupting the Warp reactor's containment field. You'll need to get permission from the Captain but that shouldn't be too much of a problem: he'll ask you how long it will take, get a nod from "This Season's Vulcan(tm)" and authorise it.

      No?

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  97. PSI, mmHg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That is equivalent to about one-quarter of a pound per square inch, said NASA spokesman James Hartsfield."

    They're not measuring it in Pascals. What's wrong with this picture? Its a little strong to suggest they deserve to die, but I'll settle for this being a portent of DOOM!

  98. Some guys have all the luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Michael Foale involved in a space station depress again? Remember he was aboard MIR when the supply craft hit it and they had to retreat into a safe pod then do a repair.

  99. Re:The problem is that the ISS is 'international' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, leave it to NASA to let their people burn up on re-entry.

  100. Perfectly Feasible by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


    Hi!

    I'm the dean of Space University here at NASA, where we train all the astronauts how to do the important stuff like gathering a tear in the corner of one eye while the anthem's being played - that sorta stuff.

    My role is largely administrative, so I don't do much hands on teaching, although I still run "Duct Tape 101" and "Swallowing Floating Globules Of Water (Advanced)". I like to keep my hand in: But I digress...

    I just wanted to assure the parent poster that Mission To Mars is indeed one of our required course materials. We also use Apollo 13 (obviously!), The Right Stuff (which is the core of "Practical Heroics"), and many, many others. We steer our students away from Capricorn One, and prefer it if they don't view 2001 too many times.

    Best Wishes,

    Rex Uranus.

    --
    Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
  101. Water Vapor (Was Re:Visible?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Air also contains water vapor. As temperature drops, water will condense from vapor to liquid or directly to a solid state.

    I suspect it still will not be visible as it will probably disperse too quickly.

  102. Don't worry... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

    ...the ISS is just passing gas. ;)

    Thanks to the vastness of space, us earthlings will not have to deal with any noxious smells. :)

  103. WTF?? by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

    Millimeters of mercury? Pounds per square inch, for heaven's sake?

    I thought NASA had gotten over this units thing and started measuring things in comprehensible units.

    What is the pressure drop measured in Libraries of Congress?

    1. Re:WTF?? by BattleTroll · · Score: 1
      We need a useful unit, something like:

      millitorrs / meter * inch

      Now that's a unit!

  104. Link to news item from December on "crunch" by labradort · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Link to news item from December on "crunch" by Wister285 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that no one else has brought this up.

  105. NASA by Raven42rac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is the last thing that NASA needs right about now. No matter what the root cause of the leak is, it will still cast a negative shadow on the space agency. The public can be a fickle bunch.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  106. Dr. Pepper by brian728s · · Score: 0

    Just let some dr pepper float around until it squirts out the hole.

  107. ISS Leak by Tubal+Kane · · Score: 1

    To find the leak, they should place the ISS into a soapy bath, and see where the bubbles form.

  108. a few points(are we geeks or not) by phrostie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1. who remembers a few months back when they thought they heard something "hit" the station?

    i would start looking in that direction.

    2. there are a number of posts about watching objects(insert with balloons, pepsi, dr peper,,,) float thru the station and use that for an indicator of air flow.

    as with other manned space programs the ISS has CO2 scrubbers(remember apollo 13) that keep the air clean. i was under the impression that the air is circulated thru these and that a flow already exists because of this. i also recall reading that with skylab this flow effect caused lose items to commonly be found at one end of the station.

    3. newtons laws of motion and inertial navagation.
    even though the ISS is in a fixed orbit, it still makes use of an inertial navagation system. it is required to keep the station from tossing and tumbling out of control when the astro/cosmo-nauts move around. each of their movements create a reaction which causes an equal and opposite reaction on the station. a computer is constatly making corrections to maintain pitch and attitude of the station. a log these corrections will show these reactions to be somewhat random with an almost noise quality.

    with a contiuous leak of a known size in the iss, a constant known vector(except for location) is created. once the noise is removed the location should be able to be calculted from the log information.

    in short, break out the slide rules!

  109. Fixing leaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fixing leaks is not that difficult. They should just run it through a debugger to find the leak. Then after that, apply a tarball directly to the leak using patch. Unfortunately, these types of leaks are all too common with multiple architects milling around.

    Another thing they can try is to remove the "memory hole" in the BIOS. This can cause lots of problems with streaming software.

    To me it smacks of some sort of date manipulation error. Started Jan 1, 2004? That's quite coincidental.

    Oh, you didn't say *IIS*?

  110. Units, SI, weightless by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

    mm of mercury, I thought inches of mercury was a more commonly used unit.

    Anyway, does anybody see the irony of measuring air pressure in a weightless environment in how high (in mm) the pressure would push mercury into a tube that has the top sealed off from the air.

    I really hate it when a single article uses 4 units (mercury, mm, pounds, inch) to express pressure (force per area).
    - Mercury has the same mass everywhere, but it doesn't weigh the same everywhere, especially on the ISS where it weights practically nothing.
    - mm, wow a standard unit, I'm impressed, but it was used in combination with mercury, while normally inches are used in combination with mercury.
    - Pounds, what pounds, deprecated unit, and again it's a measure of weight.
    - Inch, again a deprecated unit, but at least it's used to measure an area, not the height of mercury.

    1 atm (standardized sea level pressure)
    = 1.01325 Bar
    = 1013.25 mBar
    = 1013.25 hPa
    = 101325 Pa
    = 101325 N/m2
    = (approx) 29.92 inches of mercury
    = 759.968 mm of mercury
    = (approx) 14.7 pounds per square inch

  111. Prepare for the headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will likely lead to a catastropic disaster, esp if they can't find it fast.

  112. Leaks seem to follow Michael Foale around by lquam · · Score: 1

    Poor Michael is 2 for 2 on pressure leaks in space stations he's been on. Time to start calling that fella a bad luck charm.

  113. It's Deja Vu all over again... by richardneish · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly, Michael Foale was onboard Mir when it sprung a leak due to a collision with an unmanned Progress supply rocket. They were testing a new automated docking system and it malfunctioned, causing the unmanned rocket to collide with Mir causing a significant leak. [wanders off to actual _read_ the article]

    Yup, my memory is correct. The current situation is massively different from the previous one in which they had something like 30 minutes of breathable air left in the station and Michael Foale was already sitting in the escape capsule preparing it for launch / release, IIRC. Dragonfly: An Adventure of Survival in Outer Space is a well written book that describes the Mir program, including this incident.

    You know, sailors have supersitions about "unlucky" crew and someone who is involved in too many incidents find that they are no longer welcome on board. Michael may ind himself in this situation after this. :-)

  114. That sound? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one to recall that sound heard on ISS a while ago? Maybe whatever caused that noise is causing the leak?

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:That sound? by Cnik70 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the exact same thing when they first mentioned this on CNN. You would think that they would have some sort of way figured out to find where the leak is occuring. I wonder if the leak is big enough to 'smoke it out' with some sort of hazing gas material.

      --
      -Cnik
  115. Yay modern media by Kernel+Panic · · Score: 2, Funny

    If there's one thing my hollywood education has taught me its that Dr. Pepper is the best way to find a leak in a space station/vehicle.

    Somebody crack open a can and be ready for some slow motion.

    Thank you Red Planet...or Mission to Mars...or whatever the hell that movie was.

    --
    No datacenter is secure if it has windows.
  116. My Dad always taught me by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    Dip it in soapy water and look for the bubbles.. oh, is that an innertube? wonder if you could use a spectrometer to hunt for the O2 coming out.

    --
    meh
  117. Ubiquitous Movie Reference. by neBelcnU · · Score: 1

    "'Good Night Wesley, sleep well. I'll most likely kill you in the morning.' Went on like that for three years..." --Wesley, as the Dread Pirate Roberts, "The Princess Bride" (1987)

  118. someone send them pink smoke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they just flood the station with pink smoke, then look for the trails on the outside

    1. Re:someone send them pink smoke... by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

      Now THIS doesn't seem like a bad idea. In fact, it would be a BRILLIANT idea!

      Someone reading this??!!

  119. NASA Should know better..... by B5_geek · · Score: 1

    "...That is equivalent to about one-quarter of a pound per square inch, said NASA spokesman James Hartsfield..."

    But aren't this near-weightless in space?
    How can it be 1/4 of a pound? ;-) Sorry I couldn't resist.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  120. ISS Security Leak? by zetes · · Score: 1

    This may be redundant, but I was thinking the ISS (Internet Security Scanner) had a leak. That would be equally bad, I presume.

    --
    2+2=5 for extremely large values of 2
  121. This is good! by Ztream · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's the point of an experimental space station if not to learn about things that can happen to a space station and its inhabitants, and what to do about it? I think we can learn something from this.

    Of course, provided they actually solve it :P.

  122. Millimeters of mercury? Pounds per square inch? by metamatic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Didn't NASA learn anything from losing the Mars Climate Orbiter?

    "Houston, pressure is down again, we've lost three hogsheads of air in the last lunar month."

    "Sorry, ISS, can you translate that into firkins per square thread?"

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  123. Shuttles are Grounded... by Papatoast · · Score: 0

    and ISS is leaking. Thank god that the Spirit Rover mission has gone well thus far, lest I have to start cheering for the Chinese program.

    --
    We were somewhere around Barstow on the edge of the desert when the drugs began to take hold. - HST
  124. It's not the air pressure, folks... by kulakovich · · Score: 1

    It's the amount of O2 - if pressure drops, you can increase O2 to compensate to a certain point.

    And the ISS ain't dead - we just need to give NASA the funds to complete the crew module in the original spec. It takes 2.5 people to run the station, and .5 people doing science every month is an afterthought. We need to get the station back to its original 7-10 person design in order to see the returns we deserve.

    Then the moon and L5.

    kulakovich

  125. No one is ever left aboard without a lifeboat by ikluft · · Score: 5, Informative
    You could say that this procedure is the Titanic's contribution to space travel. No one is ever left aboard without a lifeboat, not even for a few minutes.

    They plan around the lifeboat capacity. Even when they used to move the Soyuz between docking ports on Mir (i.e. to free up the only port that a shuttle orbiter could use) everyone had to go aboard the Soyuz for the maneuver, just in case they couldn't re-dock. If they couldn't, they'd abandon the station until another crew could be launched to re-man it.

    Of course, they've always able to re-dock so far. There hasn't yet been an unscheduled abandonment of a space station.

    The Soyuz-TMA spacecraft serving as the current lifeboat is the one that Foale and Kaleri were launched in. But a Soyuz has a finite shelf-life. Occasionally Russia launches a short-duration crew to bring up a new Soyuz (with fresh batteries and other supplies) and take back the old one. That's just part of sustaining the long-duration mission and its crew.

    ISS has more docking ports so they don't have to juggle them like they did on Mir. (And there are no scheduled shuttle orbiter arrivals before late this year anyway.) But if they had to move the Soyuz for any reason, it would still be the same thing - all aboard and leave no one behind.

    This is a procedure NASA learned from the Russians, among many things they learned from each other. Remember, when they started working together on the Shuttle-Mir dockings in the mid- to late 90's, NASA had the experience with big shuttle orbiters, but no long-duration platforms. Russia had the experience with space stations, but wasn't able to bring as much cargo up, and almost nothing (in comparison) back down. Each had what the other needed so that worked pretty well, besides all the symbolism it made for the end of the Cold War.

    So, what are they going to do now? My guess is the first thing will be to close all the hatches to try to isolate and identify the module (or docking port between modules) with the leak. They have a finite supply of gas with which to repressurize the station - so this can't go forever without becoming a danger of shutting off a module. In a worst case scenario (which can't be ruled out yet but also isn't likely yet either), they'd have to abandon the station and take the Soyuz on re-entry back to Earth. So they have to look for it and try to fix it ASAP.

    At any given time, if Foale is forced to make a life-and-death decision as commander, even he could initiate abandonment of the station. He was aboard Mir when the Progress collision occurred in June 1997. They had to close the hatch to the Spektr module (where all of Foale's on-orbit personal belongings were), losing that module and the power from its solar panels. He's seen worse than this. But I wouldn't be surprised if he didn't sleep well tonight.

    1. Re:No one is ever left aboard without a lifeboat by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
      No one is ever left aboard without a lifeboat, not even for a few minutes.
      So that still doesn't explain how the Soyuz can be used for "two people in a medical emergency, or three people in other emergencies". If there's a crew of three, and two leave in the Soyuz due to a medical emergency, where's the lifeboat for the third?
    2. Re:No one is ever left aboard without a lifeboat by Urkki · · Score: 1

      I guess the emergeny overrules the rule abou tno lifeboat. Reasoning would be that if it's a choice between leaving one of the crew behind alone, waiting for next launch without a lifeboat, or bringing all 3 down but one of them dying on landing, then there's not much choice, is there...

  126. Oh bugger... by xA40D · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it's not a major problem. And I'm sure it will be fixed soon. So "oh Bugger..." has nothing to do with the facts of the story.

    The major problem with this story is that the British press will once again resort to rabid jingoism. Not once have I heard the name Michael Foale without the prefix "British-born". See what I mean on the BBC. I mean at no point do they mention that Alexander Kaleri was born in Latvia. Do they?

    FFS he left the UK 1983... and I really don't care where he was born. It's not important, has no relevance, and is bloody annoying.

    --
    Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    1. Re:Oh bugger... by Stween · · Score: 1

      In the very same article you link to, they state "US mission commander Michael Foale" and "Russian colleague Alexander Kaleri".

      They're quite clear about what they mean, it's just that it's nice to know (as a Brit) that Michael was born somewhere in Britain. After all, it's the British Broadcasting Corporation you linked to, there.

    2. Re:Oh bugger... by xA40D · · Score: 1

      In the very same article you link to, they state "US mission commander Michael Foale" and "Russian colleague Alexander Kaleri".

      Ooooh! I knew it! Just you... oooooh! I will you know, I WILL! I just knew somebody would mention that. I did. Just you wait. Ooooh!

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  127. Re:Trollkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moderators, these days!

  128. you're a f***ing moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah...lets invest all of this money into this giant project that unifies the nuclear capable nations of the world and then forget how much we spent and everything we've learned and start spending money on even more projects!

    f*** that. You don't throw away existing infrastructure. Its just stupid.

    1. Re:you're a f***ing moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't throw away something that has a potential use. The main use of the ISS was always to be destination for the space shuttle. Barely any useful science can be done there (there's almost always a cheaper alternative way of doing an experiment). This especially holds true ever since the staffing was cut to a skeleton crew (meaning no science can be done because the crew spends all their time maintaining the station). So, the ISS is essentially useless and using up lots of money that could be used for something like designing a successor to the shuttle (one that has actual use, because from day one the shuttle was a more expensive way of doing what could already be done as well). NASA hasn't done anything innovative with manned spaceflight since the Apollo program.

      Ofcourse, admittedly, this is mostly due to the screwed up budget system congress has used with NASA, which motivates NASA to maintain the status quo.

    2. Re:you're a f***ing moron by Dalroth · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and you ALSO have to know when to quit. It doesn't matter how much money you throw into something, if quacks like a duck it's still a duck.

      I am seeing NO practical benefit whatsoever from my money that is being put into the ISS. I am hardly seeing any that is going into the Space Shuttle program either (only those missions that carry something too big to fly abourd a Saturn V or similar rocket).

      Why do we have to spend BILLIONS of dollars for science which can be done with MILLIONS?? A few ummaned capsules, satellites and additional (larger) telescopes would give us a lot more science and cost billions less.

      Tell me, why do we need to send men up there? What can we possibly learn that we hadn't already learned with SkyLab and MIR? We're not finding new sources of energy! We're not finding new materials! We're not mining materials from asteroids or the moon! We're not finding ways to get more people into space safer! Everything we learned on the ground, we could've learned building smaller more efficient ships.

      So where is the benefit? Internation respect? That went out the window soon as Bush stepped into office, so we know how far that gets us.

      Insurance companies don't fix every totalled car for a reason: Some times you have to cut your losses and move on. It's long since been time to move on.

      Bryan

    3. Re:you're a f***ing moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, have you happened to contact all the various research teams to tell them that they aren't getting results? It will save them a lot of paperwork I imagine, if you in your brilliance have decided the ISS is useless. To think, all this work was being done when instead we could just follow your plan and abandon the investment and opportunity!

    4. Re:you're a f***ing moron by Dalroth · · Score: 1

      Welcome to America buddy. Everybody's opinion matters. If somebody doesn't voice their disgust with how these major programs are run, then we might as well live in Communist Russia. No thanks.

      I'm not against the ISS per-say. But if I don't at least argue against it on occasion and try to understand both sides of the issue, then I'm a fool and I'm doing myself and my money a disservice.

      What about you? Are are you one those people who buys into the Democrat or Republican party hook line and sinker, never questioning your beliefs? Content to let the worst travesties of both parties slide by with hardly a raised eyebrow? Or are you somebody truly interested in bettering yourself AND bettering this country?

      Demanding results for my investment isn't a bad thing. It's the American way and it's what keeps this country better than all the rest.

      Bryan

    5. Re:you're a f***ing moron by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "I am hardly seeing any that is going into the Space Shuttle program either (only those missions that carry something too big to fly abourd a Saturn V or similar rocket)."

      Um, the Saturn V could put over a hundred tons in orbit, the Shuttle can put about thirty tons in orbit. So anything "too big to fly on a Saturn V" is much, much too big to fly on the shuttle.

      Dumping the Saturns for the Shuttle was a huge mistake on NASA's part. By now the Saturn-derivatives would be much cheaper to fly than the shuttle.

    6. Re:you're a f***ing moron by Dalroth · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly, yes the Saturn V's can carry more weight, but the shuttle can carry bulkier (i.e. bigger) loads. The Hubble couldn't have been carried up in a Saturn V because it just wouldn't fit!

      That is, of course from memory. I do not claim my memory is perfect.

      Bryan

  129. It's all in (over?) your hands, moderators! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up as funny!

  130. Re: A Man on the Moon by jea6 · · Score: 1

    I read my paperback copy of "A Man on the Moon" so many times, it fell apart at the binding!

    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  131. What would happen if they had to evacuate by slinted · · Score: 4, Informative

    a couple articles from 2002 when NASA figured contingency plans in the case of an emergency or budget shortfall.
    here here and here

  132. It is Just a Dumb Thought by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    > But if the ISS is losing pressure wouldn't it gain a higher volume of mercury rather than lose it?

    No, it would lose it. A barometer measures pressure by the atmosphere's ability to push a column of mercury up a vacuum tube by pressing on the reservoir in the bowl at the bottom. As the air pressure drops, the pressing force that drives the mercury in the bowl drops, which means more of the tube mercury settles back down into the bowl.

    Virg

  133. leak by Alcoholist · · Score: 1
    Maybe they should hold a candle up to the doors and windows and look for some movement. Worked at my house :)

    --
    Bibo Ergo Sum.
  134. 200 rovers for one space station by peter303 · · Score: 1

    At $400 million a planetery robot, you could launch 200 for a $80 billion space station. You could have them crawling over every major body in the solar system.

  135. Re:duct tape OSQ by outcast36 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In Rod we Trust

  136. Just One Change by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    Just to note, the Dr. Pepper in Mission to Mars was in a drink bag, which is not a pressure vessel. It's reasonable to assume that it was non-carbonated, flavored-with-Dr. Pepper-syrup drink, not really a carbonated beverage.

    But other than that, yeah, I'm with you. It was a really dumb way to look for a leak.

    Virg

    1. Re:Just One Change by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      It's reasonable to assume that it was non-carbonated, flavored-with-Dr. Pepper-syrup drink, not really a carbonated beverage.

      Flat Dr Pepper? Bleagh!

      Man, product placement people are really the lowest form of life on the planet.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    2. Re:Just One Change by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      But other than that, yeah, I'm with you. It was a really dumb way to look for a leak.

      So out of curiosity: how do you look for a leak on a space station? If following smoke (which is nothing else but colored gas), or drink is considered stupid, how do you do it? Are there sensors around the hull spread in a matrix (not the movie, math) type of way that looks for any irregularities in material?

      I would think that after they narrowed down to which module is leaking, spraying some kind of colored gas from the inside wouldn't be that bad idea. See if the gas is "sticking" anywhere as opposed to randomly floating around.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    3. Re:Just One Change by lommer · · Score: 1

      The problem with the smoke/drink solution is that there are air purifiers and stuff on the station which will suck in the smoke much more strongly than this tiny leak.

      The way they are currently going about locating the leak is by using stethoscopes (or a similar instrument) to listen at various places on the hull for the hissing of air. Unfortunatly, they haven't found anything yet, which is why they are so confused.

  137. I Knew Rocket Scientist, and You're No... by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    > With all the sensors and remote monitoring I'd think this would be an automated alert.

    Um, I'd think it was an automated alert because Mission Control was alerted automatically when the pressure fell beyond specification. So yeah, it was an automated alert.

    Virg

    1. Re:I Knew Rocket Scientist, and You're No... by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      What I meant is that the actual problem should be alerted. They've got a reported lowering of pressure. If its a leak, they should automatically know that, not have to guess and cross-check to see if it really is, or its a sensore error.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  138. Blow soap bubbles by chiph · · Score: 1

    How about:

    Turn off the air blowers (temporarily) in each module, and blow some soap bubbles. Follow them to the leak. Might be even better if the soap had some food dye in it.

    Chip H.

  139. No fix-a-flat in their earthside emergency kit? by Roadside+Couch · · Score: 0

    I guess they forgot to bring a can of fix-a-flat in their earthside emergency kit. Do they have AAA coverage?

  140. Re:founds fo fare finch by falsified · · Score: 1

    An interesting point, but you sound like a 13-year old cigarette smoker at a skate park in how you speak. But seriously, this is Slashdot, and obviously a science-oriented story, so what's with using anything but SI? At the very least, we could stick to torr/mmHg as it's metric-based, but I think the SI pressure unit is the Pascal.

    --
    HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
  141. Re: Truth in Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sad but true. If you're kid's want to be astronauts, its time for them to learn Russian, Chinese and Hindi.

    There is always some disparity between actual events and reported history, depending upon ones position in the scheme of things.

    The lack of a common language, (the majority of the earths population do not speak English as their native tongue, if at all), makes it easier for diverse beliefs to promulgate.

    Thomas Edison did not invent electric lighting - he just reinvented it and was successful in getting the first patent.

    There is and there always has been a lack of unbiased and accurate reporting by the media, historians and religious institutions.

    Godard and Braun both pursued liquid fueled rocket propulsion. A lesser known fact is that the concept was also proposed, (earlier?), by Konstantin Tsiolovsky.

    More info from a really neat site I found:

    http://www.geocities.com/duppim/Spaceintro.html

    Alas the document appears to be missing a page or two at the end. Nonetheless it is worth the visit.

    "I live in hope that one day science will prove for once and for all that the universe was created by a penguin"

  142. Eyyyrrriiippp by Quantum-Sci · · Score: 1

    A couple weeks ago there was a CRUNCH somewhere, that they could not pinpoint.

    The hull of ISS is almost as thin as tinfoil. So now a leak?

    In two weeks we'll wake up to read that the whole end of ISS tore off, and the project will be forked.

    --
    Campaign finance reform is national security.
  143. related to the "bang"? by novakane007 · · Score: 1

    Some of you may remember the astronauts heard a loud bang a couple of months ago and they never found a source for it. There was speculation that they got hit by something, maybe it's been such a gradual bleed that they didn't start to notice up until now.

    --

    WURD!!
  144. Okay... by kitzilla · · Score: 1
    ...I'm a huge fan of the space program, but will someone please remind me what they are really doing up there in ISS? Other than watching the station slowly rot, I mean.

    The ISS budget would fund a lot of real science missions. Deorbiting the psace station would also allow us to kill the shuttle program before we blow up the ships we have left.

    This looks like more of a troll than I intend. But, seriously, are we going to wait for ISS to become a deathtrap like Mir? We can't support a fully staffed crew or properly supply it anymore.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  145. Like a toilet? by q-the-impaler · · Score: 1

    Why not use a dye like you do when checking for a leaky toilet?

    --
    Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  146. a $3 solution by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

    i sure hope they brought one of these little gems along: fix leak

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
  147. JB Weld by macdaddy · · Score: 1

    Get it right. They'll use JB Weld. That stuff is the best. :-)

  148. The 71 cockpit was pressurized to 26K' equivalent. by caveat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or at least so says this page on "Cockpit Pressurization Schedules" from the flight manual...gotta love FOIA.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  149. Bubble gum and gasoline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like this needs to be standard issue on space craft... stick it on and apply a little gas... works like a champion.

  150. what do they need all that mercury for anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    surely it just weighs it down and causes a risk of blindness.

  151. Mercury? PSI? by mi · · Score: 1

    What happened to good old Pascals? -mi

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  152. Just like MIR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an old joke I swiped off the internet (hence the AC) I love the "alient puppet" reference.

    Mir Scientists Study Effects of Weightlessness on Mortal Terror

    KOROLYOV, RUSSIA--U.S. and Russian scientists are increasingly excited
    about the Mir space station project, which promises to reveal more than
    has ever been known about the scientific relationship between
    weightlessness and mortal terror.

    "By stranding our scientists on a dilapidated space station with
    faulty wiring, loose hardware, and malfunctioning air systems," NASA
    head Daniel Goldin said, "we have created extremely favorable conditions
    for learning about spaceborne panic."

    The two Russians and one American on board the station are
    reportedly terrified beyond lucidity.

    Among the groundbreaking experiments conducted on board Mir: a
    June 25 collision with a cargo craft that depressurized the Spektr
    module; last week's emergency power shortage, caused by a disconnected
    cable; and the periodic release of "dry ice" steam that simulates
    a shipboard fire. All have been deemed a huge success by agency heads.

    "They are in a constant state of what aerospace scientists
    term 'mind-shattering terror,' frightened for their very lives,"
    Russian mission director Vladimir Solovyov said. "And we have not even
    used the hull-mounted Alien puppet that taps on the window yet."

    "We have also taken huge leaps in our understanding of the patterns
    created when one wets his pants in the weightlessness of space,"
    Solovyov said. "The urine spreads out in an expanding sphere, something
    we did not expect."

    Taking a break from his busy schedule, astronaut Michael Foale told ABC
    News reporters: "Where's my mommy?"

    "Please tell me the access code to the Soyuz capsule," Russian
    cosmonaut Aleksandr Lazutkin said. "I would like to return to the
    chaotic government and widespread hunger of my homeland."

    Scientists expect to gain even more useful data during an experiment
    at 3 a.m. tomorrow. As the astronauts sleep, whirling red siren
    lights will flood the cabin while an ear-splitting klaxon alarm jolts
    them awake.

    Detailed scientific data will then be collected on such variables as
    open weeping, uncontrollable spontaneous defecation and unusual hair loss.

  153. Allow smoking on the ISS by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Back in the goodle days, the tar from cigarette smoke would plug up minor leaks in aircraft cabins. Or is this an urban legend?

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  154. .5 atm info here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .5 atm is generally accepted to be 500 hPa (or 500 millibars for most operational meteorologists) As a rule of thumb, this is 18,000' MSL or FL180 depending on how you want to say it, but the actual level of 500mb (and thus .5 atm) changes from location to location and of course over time.

    For example...a quick glance at the upper air data sampled around 1200 GMT on 6 Jan 04 tells us that the height of 500mb is as follows below for different places around the globe...lower heights tend to signify a denser (ie colder) column of air beneath it.

    Barrow, AK (PBRW) 5380m or 17650ft
    Pickle Lake, ON (CYPL) 4875m or 15990ft
    Guam Mariana, MY (PGAC) 5916m or 19410ft
    Key West, FL (KEYW) 5884m or 19300ft
    Essen, Germany (EDZE) 5230m or 17160ft
    Amundsen-Scott (89009) 5110m or 16760ft (s. pole)
    Brasilia, Brazil (SBBR) 5890m or 19320ft
    Mt Pleasant (EGYP) 5560m or 18240ft (falkland islands)
    Churchill, MB (CYYQ) 4850m or 15910ft
    Tucson, AZ (KTUS) 5772m or 18940ft
    Omaha/Valley, NE (KOAX) 5332m or 17490ft
    Topeka, KS (KTOP) 5429m or 17810ft
    Little Rock, AR (KLZK) 5639m or 18500ft

  155. It's not the brain. by devphil · · Score: 1
    If you drop the pressure too low, the partial pressure of CO2 in your lungs doesn't get high enough for it to send a signal to your autonomic nervous system to take a breath. It turns out that when the CO2 in your lungs reaches a partial pressure of about 5% of 1atm, your brain decides its time to take a breath.

    IIRC, the brain never gets involved. It's as you wrote in the first sentence; it's entirely the autonomic nervous system.

    What's more, I read somewhere that it's due to a small ganglion of nerves located near -- of all places -- the left armpit. (Maybe for proximity to the heart?) That's what makes the decision, so to speak.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  156. Thanks by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

    Mission Control, you can rock me to sleep any time.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  157. mm mercury... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pity the people up there is NASA is really calculating this in mm Hg, what happened to the SI unit Pascals? Did they already forget that playing with units crashes spaceships?
    Does a mercury barometer even work in a 0 gravity environment?

  158. Nothing a well aimed missle would'nt fix by firstkillallthelawye · · Score: 0

    Yep...punch one up and put an end to this money flushing toilet circumnavigating the planet. 10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1...bye now!

    --
    "The first thing we must do is kill all the lawyers" - Henry VI, Wm. Shakespeare
  159. Re: The problem with international cooperation.. by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    Yeah, without international cooperation, we wouldn't have a space station in orbit at all. And that would be a good thing.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  160. Iron Man story by falsification · · Score: 1
    This reminds me of an old Iron Man comic.

    American space station had mysteriously stopped communicating. Iron Man was called to investigate why. He donned his space armor, entered orbit, and paid a visit. Holes had been ripped in the hull. He found a few dead astronauts. He was attacked by a monster. Out of nowhere its shark-like toothful maw nearly sawed his head off. Firing his repulsors, Iron Man defended himself. It was ten feet tall, green, moved like lightning, and strong enough to rip apart steel beams. It could live for days in a vacuum. A terrifically intense battle involving wits and guts. Iron Man figured out that the monster was created by the government. The government wanted to create an invincible super soldier. Shell Head was running out of air, fell to the ground, and was about to die. With his last breath, he tried to restore air pressure in the station. The monster was about to smack him with its gnarly claw, but then it was surrounded by air. It started choking to death. To the monster, oxygen was poison. It landed with a thud. Iron Man took off his mask to breathe the frigid air. Through his misty exhales, the unhelmeted superhero muttered, "What I don't understand was 'Why? Why?'" An eerie, wavering voice said, "I was just doing my job." With that, the monster expired.

  161. Black Hole by solitarian · · Score: 1

    they should be searching for tiny black holes in the space station that could be sucking out the air.

  162. Bullet hole? by Shazow · · Score: 1

    Damn, all those Iraqis shooting at the sky in celebration of Saddam's capture have finally hit something.

    - shazow

  163. How Exactly by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    > What I meant is that the actual problem should be alerted. They've got a reported lowering of pressure. If its a leak, they should automatically know that, not have to guess and cross-check to see if it really is, or its a sensore error.

    Maybe you'll want to reread that and go through the steps, because it seems that you're answering your own request. The report on lowering pressure came from pressure sensors in the station that moved out of safe range. How exactly do you propose they tell whether it's a leak or a sensor malfunction without a cross-check of the sensors? In a different way, how do you propose they detect a leak unless it's with pressure sensors?

    The system threw an alert because a sensor moved out of safe range. There's nothing wrong with setting up a system that way, and simply having one of the station astronauts verify the sensor alarm to ensure it's not a false alarm.

    Virg

    1. Re:How Exactly by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      From what I read to date they suspect a leak, they haven't isolate the problem to a leak yet.

      The report so far is, as you stated, that an alarm was raised because the sensors have shown a steady decrease in cabin pressure over a few days.
      Apparently the sensors that regulate the pressure don't see the pressure decrease, or the pressure would not be decreasing. (ie: if the regulators detected low pressure, they would compensate with more gas and the pressure would remain stable).
      If the monitoring sensors see a decrease and the regulating sensors don't, then there's a malfunction. Whether that malfunction is in the regulator or monitoring sensors must be determined. Either way ISS is not working well and someone needs to figure out what is wrong and why.

      Of course, a pressure leak is quite plausible given the hodge-podge nature of assembly and the relatively thin skin of the ISS. I personally don't consider tying a few tin cans together to be a space station. When they get around to welding girders and fastening skins like a standard building, then we'll talk about having a space station (IMO).

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:How Exactly by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      > The report so far is, as you stated, that an alarm was raised because the sensors have shown a steady decrease in cabin pressure over a few days. Apparently the sensors that regulate the pressure don't see the pressure decrease, or the pressure would not be decreasing. (ie: if the regulators detected low pressure, they would compensate with more gas and the pressure would remain stable). If the monitoring sensors see a decrease and the regulating sensors don't, then there's a malfunction. Whether that malfunction is in the regulator or monitoring sensors must be determined. Either way ISS is not working well and someone needs to figure out what is wrong and why.

      This is an incorrect understanding of the pressure system. When the monitoring sensors go out of safe range, they respond by reporting the fault to Mission Control, so that a human being can begin assessment. The pressure regulators run out reserves by a measured formula. The systems aren't tied together, and that's by design. Any pressure hull "sweats" a certain small amount of gas by its nature, and that decrease can be calculated and compensated by the regulation system. Any more than that rate is considered a leak, and the regulators are not supposed to compensate. There are two main reasons for this. Firstly, is there is a leak, Mission Control must be alerted to the leak. If the regulation system simply geared up to maintain pressure, they'd run through their carefully rationed reserves faster than usual, with no way of realizing that they're bleeding air. In the extreme, they'd realize there's a problem only when the low reserve alarm signaled, and by then their options are very limited. Secondly, if a pressure sensor malfunctions, it throws a false alarm, and the station personnel can verify this and fix the sensor. If it was tied to the regulator, the regulator would gear up erroneously, hyperpressurizing the station.

      The systems are funtioning completely as designed. The only failure is a pressure leak, and the system provided proper alert to that situation. As designed, the sensor system is meant to alert Mission Control of a potential problem, and then it's up to the humans to take over and assess.

      > Of course, a pressure leak is quite plausible given the hodge-podge nature of assembly and the relatively thin skin of the ISS. I personally don't consider tying a few tin cans together to be a space station. When they get around to welding girders and fastening skins like a standard building, then we'll talk about having a space station (IMO).

      Then you should be aware that you have a very extreme view of design durability. Would you be willing to pay the extra money to have the walls of your house made from three feet of structural concrete, with perfect valve seals for every window and door? It's very fun to think about having a gargantuan, heavy duty station in orbit, but that's unreasonably expensive. Remember that the biggest material cost for building a space station is transport to the site, so girders are not the best design by a long shot (for those wondering, pipe frames built into trusses are, which is what they use, mostly).

      Virg

    3. Re:How Exactly by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      ...Then you should be aware that you have a very extreme view of design durability. Would you be willing to pay the extra money to have the walls of your house made from three feet of structural concrete, with perfect valve seals for every window and door?
      If my house were going to be orbiting 300+ miles above the planet in negligible atmosphere, with millions of pieces of debris around it (some tracked, some not), each piece travelling at thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of miles per hour, with no way or instantly isolating broken compartments, no way ot instant escape, and no way for rescue/re-supply on anything shorter than a one week timetable, then yes; I would opt for a much smaller, much sturdier, much more monitorable contruction scheme with girder frames, thick walls, etc.
      While plate on frame contruction could be slower and more expensive to build, I think it is more reliable and stronger than the docked aluminum can approach they are using now.

      As for the whole pressurization dezign... simply flow rate sensors would keep track of the amount og gas stored in reserves, you could in fact use a system of three independent and monitorable sensors as I stated and it would be just as functional and problems would be more quickly and reliably isolated.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    4. Re:How Exactly by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      > If my house were going to be orbiting 300+ miles above the planet in negligible atmosphere, with millions of pieces of debris around it (some tracked, some not), each piece travelling at thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of miles per hour, with no way or instantly isolating broken compartments, no way ot instant escape, and no way for rescue/re-supply on anything shorter than a one week timetable, then yes; I would opt for a much smaller, much sturdier, much more monitorable contruction scheme with girder frames, thick walls, etc. While plate on frame contruction could be slower and more expensive to build, I think it is more reliable and stronger than the docked aluminum can approach they are using now.

      Plate on frame isn't a very useful design for pressure vessels, but I'll assume you mean housing pressure vessels in a girder frame and shielding it with the plates. In that case, my comparison to your house applies. To make a shield capable of stopping a piece of debris large enough to disable the current station, you'd need to make it from steel and make it at least an inch thick. That would require the weight of the current station to increase by a factor of about twenty (and that's just for the skin; girder frames would add even more weight). Again, considering the change in cost would mostly be determined by the cost of transport, you've just made the station twenty times more expensive, in a political climate where it's getting tough to find funding for it as it is. Your design specification makes it very, very safe, but too expensive to do. A big, heavy duty station that never gets built isn't much use, just like making a house with three foot concrete walls that would cost over a million dollars wouldn't sell. As for risk, if you're not willing to accept more risk in a space station than in your house, then you're probably not cut out to be an astronaut.

      > As for the whole pressurization dezign... simply flow rate sensors would keep track of the amount og gas stored in reserves, you could in fact use a system of three independent and monitorable sensors as I stated and it would be just as functional and problems would be more quickly and reliably isolated.

      The system they use uses redundant pressure monitors, and is designed to throw different triggers if one sensor trips as opposed to multiple sensors. However, as I stated before, the pressure sensing units and pressure maintenance units are not tied together, because there are no situations where you'd want the pressure maintenance unit to change its behavior autonomously and not notify an operator or Mission Control. Since every change in that unit represents some sort of problem, it's designed to require human intervention to change it. In other words, it's always better to have the pressure fall off a few millibars than have the pressure maintenance unit change without a human's direct intervention, because only a problem of some kind will necessitate that change, and you want to be sure the humans know about the presence of a problem. This isn't like a fire suppression unit, where fast reaction time is essential. Any failure severe enough to prevent the occupants from triggering changes to the pressure maintenance unit (like a major hull breach) is going to be too severe for the system to handle anyway.

      Virg

    5. Re:How Exactly by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      We obvioulsy see the world much differenly. Your thinking seems to go along with NASA's and has led to the public's non-understanding, disinterest, and near contempt for the amounts of money spent by NASA on projects that fail or don't perform as planned.

      You state that my proposed construction method would be much more expensive than the current ISS method. I would argue that the costs would me much more predictable and managable. Go look up the numbers for the ISS initial projected cost and the final cost. Compare where the project was supposed to be now (11 people living on board) and the surrent state of things (3 people on board, usually). Compared to the stated goals, ISS is a failure and a waste of money.

      As for the sensors, I don't understand why you keep saying things like "...sensing units and pressure maintenance units are not tied together...". I never stated that these units are or should be tied together. I've stated several times that there should be multiple independent sensors and controllers for cabin pressure. The redundant monitoring sensors should be separate and isolated from the control sensors, which should in turn be separate and isolated from the gas flow sensors and the tank pressure sensors. This scheme gives four points of fault isolaiton, and automated control over faults that you don't seem able to predict. Your wriring seems to indicate you can only forsee two failure scenareos: slow insignificant leak, and catastrophic breach causing instant death. There are more scenareos between those two that the system you define can not handle in a manner that would preserve life and the mission.
      In my layout, the problems are taken care of in an automated fasion, AND humans are alerted to the issue at the same time. There is nothing about this setup that is lesser than the current one you define.

      As for plate on frame not being very good for pressure vessels: that's essentially what the space station is right now. It's just more of a foil than a plate. The "plates" in a more standardized construction would not have to be solid metal. We have these wonderful composite materials like carbon fiber, fiberglass, kevlar, etc. Used in layers youl could build a larger uninterrupted volume that would be safer and easier to temperature control.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  164. Dr. Pepper to the rescrue! by cpopin · · Score: 1

    You had to see "Mission to Mars".

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
  165. inferometer? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Do we really have to go to space to measure inferences? There are plenty of good logicians on the ground.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  166. What are meteors? by Cyno · · Score: 1

    Are they rocks? Cuz I thought they were rocks, flying really fast through space.

    I wonder what would happen if one of them hit the ISS? Is the ISS's hull durable enough to withstand a meteor impact?

  167. Detecting the leak could be very easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IR.

    Think about it. Space is cold - very cold. The air inside the ISS is relatively very warm in comparison. This means that escaping air would initially be much much warmer than the surrounding environment. It would cool quite fast, but at least in the immediate vicinity of the ISS's shell it would be warmer.

    So... see where I am going with this yet?

    Use an infared heat signature. Can their camera only shoot video? If there isn't something up there that can aim at the ISS and look for it (hmm, what about these IR space telescopes?), send something up. We have IR cameras on helicopters for the cops, there is no reason one could not be retrofitted for space and used as such.

    The heat signature should look like a tiny plume coming out of wherever the leak is occurring from, dissipating quickly, but enough to detect the location.

    I fail to see why this would not work. Of course implementing a $5,000 IR camera in space would cost about half a billion dollars more or less, but I believe it *would* work.

  168. Freezing air? by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't the leaking air freeze as it comes out? Space is definietly cold enough. And as the leeking are freezes (as I think it does), why doesn't it plug the hole?

    Anyone care to enlighten me on why that is?

    --
    #include "sig.h"
    1. Re:Freezing air? by hcg50a · · Score: 2, Informative

      PV = nRT

      Pressure goes to 0.
      Volume becomes essentially infinite.
      Temperature probably remains about constant.

      So the gas doesn't freeze, or liquify, but just disperses.

      For a slow expansion of a fixed quantity of air in a confined volume (which is not at all like what is happening on the ISS), the gas would probably liquify on the walls of the container, but I doubt it would freeze: It's not cold enough, even in space. I think it would have to be within a few micro-Kelvins of absolute zero, and even then might not freeze, due to quantum uncertainty.

      Space (far from the sun) is about 3 degrees Kelvin, due to the cosmic background radiation.

      --
      HCG 50a = 2MASX J11170638+5455016
      11h17m06.4s +54d55m02s
  169. Leak Found by pvt_medic · · Score: 1

    Leak found, but the problem is that it will talk a while to fix (like a couple weeks). Lets hope if it doesnt fix quickly they are good at holding thier breath.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  170. MODERATOR? by notyou2 · · Score: 1

    Oh come on... somebody with moderator points give this guy his deserved "one more"!

  171. Oxygen Candles? by lommer · · Score: 1

    The article mentions that the astronauts are burning oxygen producing candles to make up some of the deficit of lost air. Oxygen-producing candles seems kind of oxymoronic to me, does anyone have any info or insight into how they work or what they are made of?

  172. Re:The 71 cockpit was pressurized to 26K' equivale by Wavicle · · Score: 1

    I really can't offer up much defense of my statement since it is admittedly hearsay from a lecture some years ago.

    This is the suit he brought to the lecture and put on one of the short female physics profs during the talk. He also answered the great question of "How do you do a 12 hour mission without a lavatory?!"

    I'm not an SR-71 expert so I can't say why the cockpit was pressurized and the pilots still sat in a full pressure suit. An interesting question to consider for someone with plenty of time on their hands I guess.

    --
    Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
    Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
  173. That would be russian cosmonaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or chinese Taikonaut :-)

  174. IIS Does have many leaks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it is the space station, they may have a leak. If it was the web server, we all know it has many leaks!

  175. Reasoning Reasonably by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    > So out of curiosity: how do you look for a leak on a space station? If following smoke (which is nothing else but colored gas), or drink is considered stupid, how do you do it?

    Well, just for completeness, the reason why you don't use smoke or liquid is really the same: settling. Smoke is particulate, and the particles (in zero-G) float until they stick to something, and that's bad in a system not hardened against that sort of pollution. The same is true of loose liquid, which can easily drift into circuitry and cause grief. Using Dr. Pepper is tremendously dumb, because it's sugary and therefore will cause a horrendous mess in a zero-G environment. The concept in the movie was that the leak was so fast that it was urgent to find it and it was strong enough to suction liquids, which the current ISS leak is not. The current method for finding slow leaks in spacecraft is with sound-sensing equipment that listens for the escaping air. If I recall correctly, they don't have high sensitivity equipment on ISS, so they're using stethoscopes.

    Virg

  176. Pressure suits were for bailout by caveat · · Score: 1

    The pilots wore full pressure suits in case the cockpit lost pressure or they had to bail out at 100K+...man, that would be some freefall. I'm pretty sure the suits were kept at sea-level pressure or something close to it, I suspect the cabin pressure was there to keep the suits from getting overly rigid.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  177. Space Station Functionality by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    > You state that my proposed construction method would be much more expensive than the current ISS method. I would argue that the costs would me much more predictable and managable. Go look up the numbers for the ISS initial projected cost and the final cost. Compare where the project was supposed to be now (11 people living on board) and the surrent state of things (3 people on board, usually). Compared to the stated goals, ISS is a failure and a waste of money.

    I am aware you argue that costs for a different design would be more predictable and manageable. The part that confuses me is why you think that. What difference would a change in vessel design have on unexpected costs? Are you to imply that all of the unexpected costs spring solely from inadequate design, and that your design will somehow be free of any inadequacies? Most of the problems with the ISS reaching stated goals have been political. I'm not sure how you come to the conclusion that a different blueprint would have fixed that.

    > As for the sensors, I don't understand why you keep saying things like "...sensing units and pressure maintenance units are not tied together...". I never stated that these units are or should be tied together.

    Um, then reconcile this to your statemnt in the same paragraph that "In my layout, the problems are taken care of in an automated fasion..." please. If they shouldn't be tied together, how does one automate the response of the pressure maintenance units to what happens in the sensor units?

    > The redundant monitoring sensors should be separate and isolated from the control sensors, which should in turn be separate and isolated from the gas flow sensors and the tank pressure sensors.

    All of these systems are separate and isolated at the present time.

    > Your wriring seems to indicate you can only forsee two failure scenareos: slow insignificant leak, and catastrophic breach causing instant death. There are more scenareos between those two that the system you define can not handle in a manner that would preserve life and the mission.

    Actually, there isn't much room for scenarios between the extremes here. There are two general conditions in a pressure hull: failure that's fast enough that humans can't realistically react to it, and failure that's slow enough that they can. The current system assumes that any failure that's severe enough that a human can't fix it in real time is going to be too fast for the pressure maintenance system to compensate for. If the vessel is leaking so fast that the crew can't move themselves to a safe spot and seal off, dumping the reserve tanks at full open won't be sufficient to save them. Therefore, automating the system introduces complexity that doesn't add any real degree of safety, and it was therefore left out. Also, remember that Mission Control on the ground handles much of this stuff, so in a dire emergency they could react to the breach as well.

    > As for plate on frame not being very good for pressure vessels: that's essentially what the space station is right now. It's just more of a foil than a plate.

    Incorrect. It's a pressure vessel, held to other pressure vessels by trusses and the joiner seals. Your design as you describe it is used in buildings on Earth, where there's very little pressure differential from the inside to the outside. A pressure vessel with skin is more like a submarine, where an inside "tank" is mounted inside a body frame, and panels are attached to the outside. The panels don't take pressure, just protect from impact. The fact that it's made from thin aluminum is because it's not efficient weight-wise to make it from anything heavier. A heavier pressure vessel skin doesn't add a significant amount of structural integrity over other designs.

    > The "plates" in a more standardized construction would not have to be solid metal. We have these wonderful composite materials like carbon fiber, fiberglass