Slashdot Mirror


New Gamepad Designed To Build Muscles?

Robmonster writes "The BBC are reporting a story about a product designed to address both exercise and videogaming in one fell swoop. According to the piece: 'A new type of gamepad from a US fitness equipment company aims to turn the couch potato gamer stereotype on its head. The Kilowatt controller by Powergrid Fitness is designed to build up muscle while playing a PlayStation 2, Xbox or PC game." The article explains: "In a racing game like Gran Turismo, the harder you push on the joystick, the faster a car goes, while pulling back slows down the vehicle."

441 comments

  1. White House Approved Lifestyle by Eyah....TIMMY · · Score: 4, Funny

    We might need it as the White House recommends we eat junk food (usually the preffered gaming food) as long as we excercise.

    The World Health Organization recommends eating better but they have probably never played video games.

    --

    It is not enough to have a good mind. The main thing is to use it well. - Rene Descartes (1637)
    1. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Mr+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nice FUD. The argument is over whether it is possible to be healthy and still eat foods high in sugar or fat. The US position is that diet is dependent on lifestyle and thus occasional splurging is fine for a healthy person if they exercise to burn it off. This is perfectly rational.

      The WHO basically ignored factoring in lifestyle, saying instead that certain diets were optimal for everyone. The WHO isn't wrong, they are just being overly stringent with their guidlines. The US prefers to emphasize that a healthy lifestyle can also be an enjoyable lifestyle.

      I don't see anything wrong with that. Calories are Calories, the only difference is quantity.

    2. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or the WHO recognises people do not get enough exercise, so recommend a diet better suited to this lifestyle, and the White House is looking after the interests of massive US corporations, rather than the general population.

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
    3. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It must be tiresome, having to live with all that paranoia and not being able to form free thoughts of your own.

    4. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be tiresome to tell people their argument stinks without saying why, simply calling them names (paranoid). Actually it's probably pretty easy since it takes no thought whatsoever. Next time you make a post, please remember to make a point, thanks!

    5. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Pinchy · · Score: 1

      Given the percentages of Americans who actually exercise or are overweight, I'd say that the WHO recommendations are right on target for the US.

      Calories are Calories, the only difference is quantity

      Not trying to be too critical, but this shows your lack of understanding about nutrition.

    6. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by micromoog · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      The US prefers to emphasize that a healthy lifestyle can also be an enjoyable lifestyle.

      More specifically, the administration prefers the position that a healthy lifestyle needn't exclude the delicious products of the Coca-Cola(R) Company and McDonald's(R) Corporation.

    7. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or the WHO believes that people cannot be trusted to make personal choices about food and lifestyle and that they must be told what to eat.

    8. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Calories are Calories, the only difference is quantity.

      You are stupid.

    9. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1
      Totally agree that the 'calories are calories' statement is pretty silly.

      But I think the point that the FDA is trying to make is that limiting advertising of unhealthy food, providing subsidies to healthier food providers, and taxing unhealthy ones is waaayy too stringent. Are they acting as an advocate for the junk food industry? Absolutely! And rightly so.

      The US tends to be very careful about when and how it limits the market -- one of the reasons capitalism has worked there is because the gov't keeps its nose out as much as possible. Take smoking -- it look a long time for the government to rev up policies to limit the marketing of cigarettes, but when they did, it was justified. Smoking is physically addictive and it kills. Eating sweets/junk/other empty calories, on the other hand, can be done in moderation. Is it Dolly Madison's or McDonald's fault that people overeat their products? No. There are plenty -- I among them -- who enjoy these kinds of food in moderation and can still fit into a rollercoaster seat. Until it can be proven that overeating is caused by the food itself, and not just pure western pigginess, it's only safe to say that the WHO's dietary guidelines were right, *not* their legal recommendations.

      (As a side note, I also think that the reason that so much of the US is overweight, despite the obsession with a trim appearance, is because the people care about it for the wrong reason. We want to be thin, but don't care about being healthy. Fat and cholesterol be damned, I'm going to stay on phase one of the Atkins diet until I look like Jennifer Aniston. Who cares about cardio health and liver disease. Until the population at large begins to care about the holistic picture, the scales will continue to climb)

    10. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I also think that the reason that so much of the US is overweight, despite the obsession with a trim appearance, is because the people care about it for the wrong reason.

      I totally agree with the above statement. I watch people around me go on diet after diet trying to get that trim appearance, but never exercise. I wish people would look at being trim as a side effect of being healthy and not as a goal in of itself.

    11. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WHO is not restricting you, there are giving guidelines in their best opinion. You can continue with a high sigar, high fat diet, you are free to eat what you like, they are giving their opinion (and a lot less biased by corporations paying 'lobbying' fees).

    12. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative
      Look, if you want to talk about what the government is doing wrong, you have to look at the Food Pyramid, which codifies a government-sponsored lie in a convenient, triangular symbol. From the page:

      The small tip of the Pyramid shows fats, oils, and sweets. These are foods such as salad dressings and oils, cream, butter, margarine, sugars, soft drinks, candies, and sweet desserts. These foods provide calories and little else nutritionally. Most people should use them sparingly.

      (...)

      At the base of the Food Guide Pyramid are breads, cereals, rice, and pasta - all foods from grains. You need the servings of these foods each day.

      What they neglect to mention is that sugar and white flour might as well be the same thing. It doesn't matter if you consume 50g of carbs from sugar, or from flour, they rapidly become the exact same thing in your body.

      The biggest problem with food in america is that we have a tendency to eat preprocessed food, and preprocessed food tends to have huge amounts of sugar added to it for flavor. Personally, I have always hated overly sweet food, such as the pizza sauce at Domino's... But the fact is, all this extra sugar is making us fat. Any carbohydrates you take in become fat if you don't burn (use) them.

      What you need to read on this topic is a fine article in the NYT by one Gary Taubes entitled "What if it's all been a big fat lie?" Unfortunately, NYT moved that to an archive article and you have to pay $2.95 to read it now, because they are bastards. I mean seriously, I can see a dollar or something, but three bucks? In any case I condensed the article (sharply, I'm afraid) in an article I wrote for Everything2 entitled "How the Government Fattened America". Please be gentle to E2, though it has moved to a new host it is still pretty fragile in terms of overuse.

      One of the important paragraphs from my article runs like so:

      The run up on fat began in earnest in 1977, as a Senate committee led by George McGovern declared that Americans should reduce their fat intake to curb disease, in the report "Dietary Goals for the United States". The National Institutes for Health summarily spent several hundred million dollars trying to prove a link between being fat and contracting heart disease -- which failed. On their sixth try, though, they found something they could use to prove that the previous money had not gone to waste; a study showing reducing cholesterol via drug therapy reduced the risk of some kinds of heart disease.

      The bottom line is that the government tells us to choke down the carbs. A bag of sugar (from C&H) says that "Sugar Contains No Fat" but eating fat doesn't even raise your cholesterol, eating fat mixed with a bunch of carbohydrates does. The emphasis on low-fat diets (which do not work for most people) causes many people to consume more carbohydrates. Problem is, the more carbs you eat, the more glucose ends up in your body at once. Glucose regulates hunger. Your brain will eventually build up a tolerance to it, meaning you have to eat more carbs to feel full. So, then you eat more carbs, which means you become more resistant to glucose - a classic vicious cycle.

      On top of all this, when you consume carbohydrates your pancreas produces insulin as part of the conversion process. The more carbs you take in, the more insulin is produced. The more insulin you produce, the harder your pancreas has to work, and eventually it will give up and you will become a diabetic. How's that for your carb-heavy payoff?

      So, in summation; The government says sugar is bad and other carbs are good, when in fact all carbohydrates (except fiber, which is indigestible, and cleans out your colon) have the same effect on your system. (The less processed they are, however, the slower they are

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Uber+Banker · · Score: 0

      A shame this has been modded 'flamebait' when it is a concise summary of the positions of the WHO and the White House (FDA). Which one gets bribes (ahem, donations) and lobbies from these private companies???

    14. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your summation, both the one you posted here and the one at E2. Given that it was a series of government studies, from a range of government organizations, that led Americans down the path to obesity, I think it's safe to say we can blame the government for all of us being fat today.

      Once more the truth is proven: one of the great lies of all time is, "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help you." If these people would just leave us alone to live our lives in peace, we'd all be happier (and I say this as a government employee).

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    15. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      It's called the yo-yo diet, and its long term health risks are severe.

      When you crash diet, you lose fat and muscles. When you fall off your diet and start pigging out again, you only gain mostly fat back.

      Then when you crash diet again, you lose fat and muscles. ETc. etc. In the end, you end up fatter and less strong than when you started.

      If you weighed 300 pounds, and want to weight 190 pounds.. you have to start acting like a 190 pound person. That means what their level of eating AND exercising. Even if you were lucky to diet down to 190, you won't stay there unless you turn into a 190-pound person on the inside too. That is why they call it a lifestyle change instead of a diet. It's tough to do, but it is possible if you really want it badly enough.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    16. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "I think it's safe to say we can blame the government for all of us being fat today."

      wait... does that mean we can all sue the goverment instead of the fast food industry? We have the food pyramid to prove it and I've heard the gov't has some pretty deep pockets.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    17. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (The less processed they are, however, the slower they are converted, which is why wheat bread is better for you than white.)

      I agree with everything you said, but white bread is a type of wheat bread. If you see bread labeled "wheat bread", check the ingredients. If the first one is "enriched wheat flour", it is just white bread, I don't care what color the bread is. Only if it says "100% whole wheat" will it be actual whole grain bread. Even Branola brand bread is tricky saying something like "made with whole grains", sure like 2% is whole grain. Check the ingredients, its just white bread. So look for that 100% and look out for enriched. Bookmark this or even print it out if you care about this, because it can be tricky!

    18. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I meant to say whole wheat. Lately Albertsons has started to carry Atkins brand and Orowheat brand low-carb breads, so it's a non-issue for me. Of course, that increases one's soy intake, and there was that study done at the U of HI that indicates that there might be some correlation between high soy intake and alzheimer's, possibly due to hormones of the soy plant, so I guess you're screwed no matter which way you turn :) That study has yet to be confirmed by secondary sources however, so I guess until further notice, I'll stick with the soy flour breads.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by beguyld · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Until it can be proven that overeating is caused by the food itself, and not just pure western pigginess, it's only safe to say that the WHO's dietary guidelines were right, *not* their legal recommendations.

      The food itself certainly can cause overeating. The food that does that is carbohydrate foods which over-stimulate insulin production. Most sugars for sure, and for many people, fruit, potatoes and grain products. Insulin causes fat storage and also tends to create more appetite. This is an evolutionary development that allows the rapid storage of fat during times when a lot of food is available, such as during the short season of fruit, honey, etc. Excess insulin causes blood sugar yo-yo effect, and cravings for more sugar.

      Some of us are quite sensitive to this, thus the popularity of the Atkins Diet. It may be extreme, but the low-carb approach in general (hopefully one a little more moderate) does in fact work for many people.

      But it does not work for everyone! We have genetic differences. Eskimos do not eat the same as Iranians, and each probably would not do well on each other's diets. But on their own traditional diets they do very well indeed. That is a major problem with most diet recommendations: They want to recommend One Diet to Rule Them ALL. No can do. Does not fit the real world of different genetics.

      However, guzzling Big Gulps is not good for anyone, regardless of genetic makeup. Natural, healthy, fat is just fine, and some of us need a large amount of it in our diets to stay healthy. To insist that everyone must eat little fat is crazy, as I have found for myself. There is only fat or carbs as a reasonable fuel source, and I can't handle many carbs, thus fat is where I get most of my fuel calories.

      The Low-Fat mantra has been accepted by nearly everyone as THE TRUTH, when in fact it is mostly used to promote Low-Fat commercial trash foods. Some fats, such as vegetable oils that have been bleached, over-refined, and over-heated until they resemble plastic more than any actual food are dangerous in any amount. But fat as it exists in nature is necessary for good health. That's why they call them Essential Fatty Acids.

      If humans are not designed to use fat for fuel, why we do store our excess fuel as fat?

    20. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and ketchup is a vegetable.

      I guess once you vote republican you can believe anything.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    21. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Zack+Evergreen · · Score: 0
      Repeat after me, "It is not the government's fault I am fat, It is not the government's fault I am fat. It is not the fast food industry's fault I am fat, it is not the fast food industry's fault I am fat. My body is my own responsibility, My body is my own responibility. "

      That said I disagree with all government driven scientific efforts, not only because of their terrible ineffeciency and failures in the past, but because I'm a libretarean. I would go into a long winded speach about the glories of small government and how we'll get there anyway, but I'd just be getting off topic.

      --
      "Am I a butterfly dreaming I am a man? Or a bowling ball dreaming I am a plate of sashimi?" &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp
    22. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Zack+Evergreen · · Score: 0

      Woohooo! I misspelled the name of my own party. It's libertarian, sorry for the spam! Anyway I still stand by what I said. It is not the goverments fault if you are unhealthy, obese, poor or otherwise suffering from life's suckages. 9 times out of 10, it is your own sorry self's fault... And that ends your daily dose of double post spam. Sorry!

      Oh BTW Libertarian not libretarean, need to slow down on the caffiene.

      --
      "Am I a butterfly dreaming I am a man? Or a bowling ball dreaming I am a plate of sashimi?" &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp
    23. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by instarx · · Score: 1

      The US food industry is largely based on producing and selling high fat, high sugar, high profit foods. If the government supported the WHO report (that BTW reaches conclusions most people would call common sense - such as more fruit and vegetables, less fat and sugar) the Bush administration would actually be suggesting (gasp) profit-reducing changes in the food industry. That those changes would benefit all Americans makes no difference since it would not benefit the U.S. food industry executives.

      The Bush administration's calling of the WHO report "bad science" is just another example of using spin and obsfucation to support their "profit at all costs" agenda.

      That's not paranoia - its simply the truth.

    24. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      As an individual, it is my responsibility to not be a big fatass. As a nation, the blame rests with the government. I in fact kicked my doritos habit, went on the atkins diet, and lost 130 lbs (though I've probably put 30 of it back, since I haven't been working out. I plan to join a gym realsoonnow, soon as I have some money.)

      Your little repeat after me mantra sounds like the average knee-jerk talk radio conservative. You're just being a jackass. It's not necessary to condescend, because I am not below your level. Obviously.

      The fact is that people look to the government for guidance. That is what it is there for. In this case, the government misled the American people in order to protect their phony-baloney jobs. The fact is that the vast majority of people are sheep, and the government knows this and uses it to divide us and keep us suppressed. Given this, they should feel some responsibility when they tell us things they know not to be true, and bad things happen to us as a result.

      As an offtopic aside, it's amazing how the two-party system screws us. If you vote for the Dems, then you increase social services spending, and for laws which mandate good behavior. If you vote for the Reps, then you cast your vote for the removal of all possible freedoms (abortion debate anyone?) and they won't really cut your taxes; they'll spend it on the military-industrial complex, which in the end is just another social services program - for rich people. So there really is no lesser of evils. And a vote for the Libertarians, who I too would dearly like to see in office, might as well be a vote for Mickey Mouse. This of course holds true for any party which isn't one of the two.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Nice FUD [...] Calories are Calories, the only difference is quantity.

      Nice FUD indeed. You gorge yourself with cholesterol and hydrogenated oils and fats, I'll go cook with olive oil and eat some fish.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    26. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The referenced article is available here: What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie?

    27. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1
      Very well said -- I didn't stress enough that there isn't 'one diet to rule them all.' We're all different, and our dietary requirements certainly are too.

      I for one, tend to put on belly fat if I'm not careful about my carbs, so I totally agree with your healthy fat statements. It's the people that think they can continually eat whatever fat they want, and just avoid the carbs, that worry me. I think 20/20 or some such show followed a bunch of people trying different weight-loss programs around, and the Atkins guy's typical dinner was 6 McD's quarter pounders, sans the bread. Not what I'd call healthy fat, compared to some nice omega-3 fats like you'd get with salmon or tuna. Hell, even trim strip steak would beat the clown's pseudo-meat. And don't even get me started on trans-fatty acids from partially hydrogenized veggy oil, the 'plastic' oils as you so rightly described.

      Anyway, you're totally right. Different strokes for different folks. Thanks for the good points.

    28. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by beguyld · · Score: 1

      What was that? Someone agreed with me about food? Thanks for listening. Really. Quite a lot I get the same response as trying to warn those who bought Amazon stock at 200+ and were sure it was going up forever.

      BTW, grass-fed beef, if you can find it, has an excellent omega-3 to omega-6 ratio, just like wild game. But if they are fed grain before butchering they very rapidly lose their omega-3 content ratio. The trick then is to find a rancher who skips the "fattening up" step. I'm lucky to live where I can get such beef year-around. But you can find sources here: http://www.eatwild.com Lamb is also a good choice if you like it, as it is almost always raised on pasture.

      I agree that just eating meat, especially the rather poor quality hamburger of the fast food world, is not a good diet. The excessive carbs are so unhealthy for many people though, it still might be better. Also, when I switched I found I loved fatty meat for a few weeks until my body stabilized. Now I find my biggest challenge is getting enough vegetables to balance out my diet properly or I tend to let the starches creep back up, and neither too much starch or too much meat is not good. We have some balance point it's best to keep each meal.

    29. Re:White House Approved Lifestyle by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't the lost muscle - you can gain that back. The problem is, as you say in a roundabout way, by crash dieting you never learn to eat like a healthy person. Living on 600 calories a day for a few weeks or months doesn't teach you anything useful about keeping the fat off once you lost it.

  2. not new. by bludstone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its called a dance dance revolution pad, and those have been around for years.

    (I obviously havnt read the article)

    --

    no .sig
    1. Re:not new. by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Damn skippy. I started at the beginning of the year, and I'm up to 600 calories/day. I'm thinking about putting my journal on-line.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    2. Re:not new. by MoonFog · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember the "Summer olympics" games back in the days, where the runner ran faster the faster you moved the joystick back and forth. We (me and some friends) picked up an old amiga some months ago, and tried it again.. My arm hurt for weeks after that....

    3. Re:not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You moron, RTF..... oh nevermind.

    4. Re:not new. by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 5, Funny

      [whispering] Tommy, I wouldn't mess with him ... he plays video games!

    5. Re:not new. by micromoog · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's way older than that . . . the NES Power Pad showed up in the 80s. It may have encouraged a bit of exercise at first, but kids quickly discovered that if you pushed the pads with your fingers instead of your feet, you could easily make the character run at instant-heart-attack speeds.

    6. Re:not new. by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heck, we used to play Olympic Decathlon on my old TRS-80, in which you ran as fast as you could tap two alternating keys. Talk about an instant case of Repetitive Stress injuries...

      It was fun, though!

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    7. Re:not new. by oskillator · · Score: 1
      I always thought the calorie counter in DDR was a great idea, but wondered about its accuracy; every other piece of exercise equipment tells me I'm burning about 3 calories per hour.

      I couldn't find much hard information online about its accuracy, but I did find this FAQ, which includes cheat codes to effortlessly max out the calorie counter.

    8. Re:not new. by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Because creating and joining support groups/communities are a proven effective technique to stick with an exercise program.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    9. Re:not new. by Trevin · · Score: 1
      every other piece of exercise equipment tells me I'm burning about 3 calories per hour.

      You must not be using your excercise equipment. The treadmills I use at 24-Hour Fitness tell me I'm burning over 200 Cal/hr just by walking, and I typically exceed 1000 Cal/hr when running.

    10. Re:not new. by Anonymous+Struct · · Score: 1

      Hey, I remember those (Epix?) games... Summer Games, Winter Games, and Summer Games II! Yeah, my dad taught me how to solder when we used to have to put those joysticks back together.

    11. Re:not new. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      But, I'd venture a guess that your wrist was fine.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    12. Re:not new. by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      While we're on the subject, I recommend the RedOctane Ignition Pad 2.0. 2 inches of foam = not nearly as much slippage as flimsy soft pads, which you can wear out within a couple months.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
    13. Re:not new. by ooby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well the Kilowatt will end up in the closet on top of the Power Pad, the Power Glove, the Sega Activator, and that arm wrestling coin-op.

    14. Re:not new. by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      I think there's some kind of scale issue here... Maybe yours is counting in thousands? If a soda is 140 calories, and you're burning 3 calories an hour... That means it'd take about 2 days of constant use to burn off one soda, and I know that can't be right.

      Meanwhile, if you're doing some fairly heavy exercise I could see where one could possibly hit 3,000/hour... Though that number seems high, because an estimated daily intake is a 2,000 calorie diet. (Scratches head)

      I have wondered about accuracy, though. Still, it's enough to get me moving, sweating, meeting goals and loosing weight. It's working, so I guess that's "close enough" for my needs. ;)

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    15. Re:not new. by syle · · Score: 1

      It's extraordinarily inaccurate. You think hitting a 'perfect' burns more calories than hitting a 'great?' It's just another scoring system.

      --

      /syle

    16. Re:not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a scale problem when referring to calories. Calories as reported on food labels are actually kilocalories, or 1000 calories. IIRC 1 calorie is the amount of energy required to raise 1 g (or 1 ml) of water 1 degree celsius at standard temperature and pressure. This probably isn't the problem with the op, but an interesting point. I do know that some machines report the total number of calories burnt so far, rather than calories per hour. In that case, 3 Calories is pretty good for a 5 minute jog or something like that. I haven't ever gotten much higher than 1,000 Calories per hour working out on an erg machine, and from the energy I was expending there, I doubt many people could withstand exerting 3,000 Calories an hour for very long.

    17. Re:not new. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be Epyx..

    18. Re:not new. by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      This also explains why DDR M2 measures the amount of exercise achieved in kCals. Thanks for the clarification. :)

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    19. Re:not new. by prockcore · · Score: 2, Funny

      I remember the "Summer olympics" games back in the days, where the runner ran faster the faster you moved the joystick back and forth.

      That game was the quickest way to break an Apple][e joystick.

      I remember Nintendo put out the Power Pad for that game.. great leg workout, although most people just knelt down and hit the pad with their hands.

    20. Re:not new. by stuph · · Score: 1

      here's a good basic chart for calories burned/hour, approximately.. then again, you have to realize you burn between 1200-2600 or so calories per day just by living (depends on fitness level, weight, etc).. without doing anything else.. just sitting on your ass..

      --
      --Less Thinkin', More Drinkin'...
    21. Re:not new. by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      or howzabout...

      "The Insult That Made a 1337 d00d Out Of Mac"

    22. Re:not new. by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      You must be female, guys never have trouble with that sort of thing...

    23. Re:not new. by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      It only does that if you don't set the option to score all steps. When that option is enabled, even when there are no arrows at all, it'll increment the "calories burned" total.

      Of course, it can't take skill into account. Some songs, I could sleep through, and others turn me into a shuddering heap on the floor - yet I've burned the same amount of calories. The complexity of the routines and distance of leg movement can't really be gauged. But one thing is universal: if you want to see high calorie totals, play MaxX Unlimited in heavy mode.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    24. Re:not new. by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      I think that all new TVs need to be attachable to a treadmill, and exercise bike, a stair climber, etc. that wil shut the device down if a certain cadence or time limit is not met.

      I know I'd be in WAY better shape, and so would my wife.

      Perhaps a quota system: 1 hour of low treadmill activity will give you 15 minutes of TV viewing. 1 hour of high treadmill activity will give you 1 hour of viewing.

      Just my $0.02.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    25. Re:not new. by Katharine · · Score: 1

      Buck_Wild wrote:
      I think that all new TVs need to be attachable to a treadmill, and exercise bike, a stair climber, etc. that wil shut the device down if a certain cadence or time limit is not met.

      Perhaps this bicycle-powered generator will help you:

      http://www.gaiam.com/retail/product.asp?product_id =17330

      And here's a guy who built his own:

      http://users.erols.com/mshaver/bikegen.htm

    26. Re:not new. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I remember the "Summer olympics" games back in the days, where the runner ran faster the faster you moved the joystick back and forth. We (me and some friends) picked up an old amiga some months ago, and tried it again.. My arm hurt for weeks after that....

      "Back in the day" you were probably 13 and your arm had a bit more... uh, practice.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    27. Re:not new. by inkhorn · · Score: 1
      True, but if you read the description of the kiloWatt on their website, you'll notice :
      " kiloWatt is an intensely immersive game controller that transforms video game play into muscle burning sport."

      I think I'll stick with DDR until they sort that problem out....
    28. Re:not new. by binarytoaster · · Score: 1

      The Metal pad by the same company is a lot better, but you may not be willing to spend the extra $100(or 200 if you're getting two for doubles)...

      Still, I plan on buying one or two in order to lose the 30 pounds again :)

    29. Re:not new. by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Simply amazing. Many thanks!

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  3. This would be more helpful by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This would be more helpful if worked with my everyday system taskes ( build, check logs, ect.. ).

    The faster I ran on this thing, the faster my compile would go. I'd buy it.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:This would be more helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll tell you what you can do with your systeme taskes, you fucking nimrode.

    2. Re:This would be more helpful by Nutt · · Score: 4, Funny

      If that existed I'd give it about a day (max) for someone to post on here a way to hook up a v8 engine to turn/power/whatever the device and be able to compile gentoo with every package in ONLY 15 MINUTES!

    3. Re:This would be more helpful by MoonFog · · Score: 1

      To get Gentoo fully installed, you'd have to run the New York Marathon.. twice.

    4. Re:This would be more helpful by ChinaJoe · · Score: 1

      There are desk exercisers out there. One powers your monitor while you pedal.

      Hell, someone even made a pedal powered Wi-Fi network for Laos.

    5. Re:This would be more helpful by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Depends on the force required to turn the measurement device. If it's very little, you can use your V8 to compile in 15 minutes, and I'll use my plunge router and be done in about 3. =]

    6. Re:This would be more helpful by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      To get Gentoo fully installed, you'd have to run the New York Marathon.. twice.

      I was thinking more along the lines of running in the Paris to Dakar rally.

    7. Re:This would be more helpful by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      This would be more helpful if worked with my everyday system taskes ( build, check logs, ect.. ).

      The faster I ran on this thing, the faster my compile would go. I'd buy it.

      Come on people! It wasn't that long ago that most computing devices were hand cranked. Take this example from the 1920s. Possibly the world's finest mechanical calculator, the Curta, was sold from 1947 to 1973.

      About thirty years ago my father worked a summer job as a cashier in a liquor store. The cash register was electromechanical--under normal circumstances, it ran off ordinary wall current. This was a rural community and power outages were not uncommon. When the electricity was off, cashiers could crank a handle for each addition operation. My dad asserts that the mechanism was rather stiff, and a few hours of cranking through purchases was quite a workout.

      Of course, if you really want a hand-cranked computer, you should talk to this guy.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    8. Re:This would be more helpful by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      Hey, why not power your computer via a generator from a stationary bike or something?

      O'course, at 11 kCals/min if you're biking at a moderate pace and weigh 200 lbs... odds are you couldn't bike fast enough to power it.
      But if you had a cluster of these exercisers...

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    9. Re:This would be more helpful by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      Ahhh.....the smell of burning CPUs :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    10. Re:This would be more helpful by DanV · · Score: 1

      I dont get it.
      Why would you slow yourself down from getting a security patch in production?
      There are some things you need to do ASAP.

  4. I can see it now... by tinrobot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Geeky gamers with Popeye arms...

    1. Re:I can see it now... by tommck · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought most of them already had Popeye arms from ... well... you know...

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    2. Re:I can see it now... by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 4, Funny

      from pressing CTR-ALT-DEL ?

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    3. Re:I can see it now... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      That's ONE Popeye arm.
      Er, we're talking about bowling, right?

    4. Re:I can see it now... by tommck · · Score: 3, Funny

      well, actually I alternate occasionally... it feels like someone else is doing it... :)

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    5. Re:I can see it now... by IPFreely · · Score: 1

      So how many of us would have made it all the way through the boss levels if we actually had to be able to lift the BFG9000?

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    6. Re:I can see it now... by MAPA3M · · Score: 0

      There are already quite a few lonely geeks with at least ONE Popye arm... unless, of course, they're ambidexterous

      Karma go down the hole.......

    7. Re:I can see it now... by mothrathegreat · · Score: 1

      Lol thats exactly what the old xbox controller did, I had to put the bloody thing down after half an hour

      --
      Extended Warranty? How can I lose!
  5. Now all we have to do.... by CHaN_316 · · Score: 1

    Is create muscle building keyboards and mice, and this will hail a new era of buff geeks with super upper body strength. It's a dream come true!

    --
    "There is no spoon." - The Matrix
    1. Re:Now all we have to do.... by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but these muscle building keyboards and mice would then reduce our on-the-job productivity since we'd end up being too tired to do any work.

  6. What the hell is this? by AntiOrganic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do these people really think that this is going to have a substantial impact upon the overall fitness level of gamers everywhere? It's not. You want to lose some weight? You stop eating like a fatass and you go outside. We're not even talking Atkins diet here, just "stop eating when you're not hungry, not when you're full." This combined with half an hour of exercise a day is all you need. Mild muscular tension is not an appropriate method of weight loss.

    Why all the gimmickry?

    1. Re:What the hell is this? by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      Getting half an hour excercise per day can be hard.
      I mean, I have dogs, but you guys all sit inside all day and are pale.
      So instead of killing your boss (Virtually, in your mind, so you wont in rl) with your fingertips, youd have to work for it. Perhaps even for thirty minutes.

      THEN eat less, and sure nuff, youd loose weight.

      "/Dread"

    2. Re:What the hell is this? by OriginalSpaceMan · · Score: 1

      I agree. I didn't even start eating less, I just stopped drinking Mountain Dew all day. Then I joined a martial arts class for 2 hours per week. I went from 260lbs to 180lbs and ripped in about 10 months. I will never trust any diet other than good old fasion "eat less, excerise more".

      --

      You talk better than you fool!
    3. Re:What the hell is this? by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah...not only is this bs made to make people feel better about not getting any exercise, it's probably BAD for you. I mean, playing video games can give you RSI and so on. Making the joysticks stiffer will just amplify it...instead of repeatedly pushing lightly, you are repeatedly pushing heavily. This will cause a LOT more wrist damage, I would expect.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    4. Re:What the hell is this? by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. I can see this working your muscles somewhat, as you say, and possibly resulting in some minor weight loss. But (and I am speculating here, so correct me if I'm wrong) it seems to me it misses a fairly important component of general health, and that is cardiovascular fitness. I doubt it'd cause much of an elevation in heart rate or get you puffing.

    5. Re:What the hell is this? by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      don't forget the third step:
      Amputate unnecessary appendages!

    6. Re:What the hell is this? by OriginalSpaceMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL, Like sending a foot to Mars?

      --

      You talk better than you fool!
    7. Re:What the hell is this? by markfive · · Score: 1

      If you were to read the article, you would have noticed that the "joystick" is not operated by the wrist, but by the entire torso.

    8. Re:What the hell is this? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      I doubt it'd cause much of an elevation in heart rate or get you puffing.

      You've obviously never played System Shock 2 in the dark, at night, while suffering from a caffeine OD.

    9. Re:What the hell is this? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      "stop eating when you're not hungry, not when you're full."

      a very un-insightful statement there.

      many people that are overweight do stop eating when they are not hungry. their insulin-intolerance causes a insulin spike to last too long making them hungry too long.

      Maybe if you knew much about the human diet and medical conditions that are common to cause obesiety you would have not made such a stupid remark.

      want to lose weight? go to a doctor and have him/her tell you what YOU need for weightloss and lifestyle changes. only a fool believes the line of yours I quoted.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:What the hell is this? by daddymac · · Score: 2, Funny

      So instead of carpal-tunnel everyone will get torsal-tunnel, is that better? :)

      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
    11. Re:What the hell is this? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Great now all gamers will have RSI in their backs.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    12. Re:What the hell is this? by Golias · · Score: 1
      Do these people really think that this is going to have a substantial impact upon the overall fitness level of gamers everywhere? It's not. You want to lose some weight? You stop eating like a fatass and you go outside.

      Hey, dumbass! This isn't being sold as a weight loss product. It's an alternative to the boredom of doing bicep curls to build arm strength.

      Weight training != aerobic workout.

      (However, the more muscle mass you have, the more you benefit from your aerobic exercise, so something like this doesn't hurt if you are doing it in addition to your usual workout.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    13. Re:What the hell is this? by Jack+Zombie · · Score: 1

      You want to lose some weight? You stop eating like a fatass and you go outside.

      I disagree. You assume that people have an iron will; they don't. By your logic, anyone would just do anything that they wanted to: common people would come together and make sacrifices for the greater good, weak people would join a Shaolin temple, shy people would host big social parties, depressed people would walk about happily tapdancing on the streets, violent people would make love, not war, etc -- but obviously, it doesn't happen that way, since, well, they don't want to, because they lack a good reason to do so. The bigger problem that overweight people have is lack of motivation: what happens frequently is they gather enough courage to try and moderate their food comsuption and do some regular exercise for 1 or 2 weeks, don't get immediate noticeable results and quit frustratred at themselves. What this machine offers is a way for fat gamers (and non-fat gamers too!) to do some exercise, without changing too much their daily routine, and having some fun while they're at it -- like hiding the pill in the dog's food so that he doesn't make noise about it, -- which, if you actually experiment it and not just theorize about it, can be vital to help induce the person to live a healthier lifestyle. Afterall, it's no secret that most self-built sucessful people have high levels of confidence and motivation.

      That's why all the gimmickry.

      --
      "You should never doubt what nobody is sure about." -- Willy Wonka
    14. Re:What the hell is this? by haystor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A very small minority of people that are obese actually have medical problems that caused them to gain weight. Some do have problems which make it very difficult to stay slim, but there are certain laws of the universe that govern the conservation of mass which imply that if they eat less, they weigh less.

      Most people will just finish the portions they are served.

      Stop being an apologist for all those poor fat people that have everything stacked against them. If they are 5'3" and 270lbs from eating at McDonald's every day, it's not the fault of McDonald's, it's the fault of the person that didn't figure it out when they were 200lbs, then 210, 230, 250, etc...

      Hell, I'm overweight because I sit on my ass all day and eat too much. I finish all my fries even after I'm no longer hungry.

      I read a study once that fat people don't remember what they've eaten as well as thin people.

      --
      t
    15. Re:What the hell is this? by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Ride a bike home to/from work?

      Take the stairs intead of the escalator?

      Get off a few stations before your usual stop and walk a few blocks.

    16. Re:What the hell is this? by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Getting half an hour excercise per day can be hard.

      So from the time you get up in the morning to the time you go to bed at night you don't have a spare 30 minutes to an hour 3 days a week? Not having the time to and not having the motivation to are to vastly different things.

    17. Re:What the hell is this? by FreeTheFurniture! · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's going to be a hell of a lot more work for me launch this thing across the room in frustration after the 50th failed attempt at Peak 3's (SSX3) Slopestyle run.

      Oh man, now video games are too strenuous as well. Time for the old stand by: cross-stitching.

    18. Re:What the hell is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn stars don't remember their sex partners as well as priggish schoolmarms, news at 11...

    19. Re:What the hell is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, there is a substantial and growing body of evidence (http://www.omen.com/adipos.html) that indicates the basic "eat less and lose weight" concept is drastically oversimplified. In a macro sense it is true, but the myriad other factors change the equation. Reducing calorie intake by X amount/time period doesn't directly correlate to Y amount of weight loss.


      The false notion that fat people are just gluttons is even more overused than the excuse by fat people that "I just have a slow metabolism".

      A lot of the blame fat people get really belongs to the diet/nutrition industry. The offer a one size fits all approach that more and more evidence shows is wrong.

    20. Re:What the hell is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no way in hell I'm cutting off 10% of my body mass. Besides that, my penis is precious to me!

    21. Re:What the hell is this? by haystor · · Score: 1

      I would agree with your placement of the blame if people actually followed the advice of nutritionists.

      It's my observation that they behave like smokers. They know what they are doing is self-destructive but they do it anyway.

      People like eating, smoking, drinking, driving fast, gambling, spending money, dating two women at once, etc...

      --
      t
    22. Re:What the hell is this? by wondafucka · · Score: 1

      They'll get RSI in their backs and their wrists.

    23. Re:What the hell is this? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      If that comment doesn't qualify for a goatse link, I don't know what does.

      Rich

    24. Re:What the hell is this? by TheMysteriousFuture · · Score: 1
      Just wanted to say thanks for the laugh...Your sig* is hysterical

      *parrents sig is
      -- Proud Captor of several Mensa Members, and they taste like chicken!


      (get the backstory)
      --
      .sig
    25. Re:What the hell is this? by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1
      Lumpy: Thank you. I'm sick and tired of the "eat less, exercise more" response. It may work for most people, but not everyone.


      I can walk 1+ hour twice a day, everyday (up and down hills), eat less then 2000 cals (none of it junk food), and I will still gain weight.


      If eat less, exercise more works for you, be happy because it doesn't work for everyone. If you are like me, see a doctor and be ready to do some real work (diet, exercise, pills, and more).

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    26. Re:What the hell is this? by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 1
      I would agree with your placement of the blame if people actually followed the advice of nutritionists.

      Your statement would have more merit if anyone actually followed the advice of nutritionists. Even -- and in some cases especially -- thin people don't follow their advice.

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    27. Re:What the hell is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way weightlifting is not an aerobic exercise is if you're doing it wrong. But then you're probably one of those pussies that use less than 300 lbs for bench and deadlift reps.

    28. Re:What the hell is this? by VVrath · · Score: 1

      "stop eating when you're not hungry, not when you're full."

      It's that simple, but it ain't that easy. The Hacker's Diet talks a lot about how that piece of common sense doesn't work for most 'fatasses'.

    29. Re:What the hell is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good god.. considering the tone of your reply, I think it's safe to ask when YOU are going to stop making excuses for yourself?

      you are overweight because you consume too much energy, you consume too much energy because it's consumption has an initial positive effect on you emotionally, you abuse this chemical effect like a smoker, an alcoholic, a heroin addict..in 99% of the cases it is a purely psychological problem, and in the cases where there is an insulin issue, those problems are sure to manifest themselves in serious health problems outside of just excess weight/obesity..

      feel free to read and ignore this like you do the others, but remember who is to blame when you die in your 40s

    30. Re:What the hell is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      real work? pills are real work? I think eat less, exercise is real work.. and anything other than that is called riding an excuse save having SERIOUS medical problems which would manifest themselves in many many other more serious ways than simply being overweight. I find it amazing that a site like slashdot, which is supposed to be a testament to all things science and logic, could have so many people who have built up the same ridiculous straw house in their head that can be shattered with just one and any piece of logical analysis.

    31. Re:What the hell is this? by Karadryel · · Score: 1
      want to lose weight? go to a doctor and have him/her tell you what YOU need for weightloss and lifestyle changes.

      ... Proud Captor of several Mensa Members, and they taste like chicken!

      And the doctor says: Stop eating the f'ing Mensa members, fat-ass!

    32. Re:What the hell is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, ~2000 calorie diet with walking ~5 miles every day is very much within the range of retaining stable weight. you can't lose weight taking in 2000 calories a day unless you played several hours of high-intensity sports every day.

      i'm speaking from experience here. i've tried many different weight loss approaches, but it wasn't until i cut my calorie intake to ~1200 daily that i started losing weight. i managed to stay on it for a year, losing a total of 60 pounds. it was difficult like all hell for the first two weeks, but then you get used to it. and necessity forces you to come up with some very clever cooking techniques make the most out of the calorie limit. :) (the hacker's diet was most inspiring, btw...)

    33. Re:What the hell is this? by Lumpy · · Score: 1


      Stop being an apologist for all those poor fat people that have everything stacked against them.


      maybe if you actually read my post instead of repsonding after you read the first two lines you would have understood this.

      only a complete and utter moron believes that to lose weight you simply stop eating as much. No, you haveto get your butt to a doctor s othat that doctor can give you a solid plant to lose weight safely and the most effectively for you. if you eat only at ANY resturant you are going to gain weight like a madman. Because the fat content AND the carbohydrate content is insanely high in prepared foods. The whole thing I was saying is that YOU have to make the decision and YOU have to go see a professional to get the insight on the lifestyle change that is required. A large amount of people in the USA do have an insulin resistance, some are just plain lazy tubs that dont care.

      I'm not being an "apologist" I;m just saying that I'm tired of know-nothings touting that "dont eat as much" is the answer, because it is not for over 50% of the people out there.

      the answer is change your lifestyle, change your diet, and have a professional that can run the tests needed to determine exactly what is needed.

      I personally had to change to a diabetic diet. I ride my bike 3-12 miles a day and during the summer will on occasion ride >50 miles towing over 100 lbs of camping and film gear. I still gained weight until I stopped eating carbohydrates.

      I eat as much as I did then, I'm losing almost 3 pounds a week and I am exercising less (winter makes it a bitch to ride)

      oh one more thing....

      Most people will just finish the portions they are served.

      this is usually based on a very stupid tradition forced on people as children... mom or daddy saying "finish everything on your plate!" is the stupidest and worst thing you can do to a human. it trains them to eat more than they need.

      I encourage my children to waste food and not eat everything. they dont have a weight problem as they dont see that food MUST be eaten and to throw away food is perfectly fine.

      It royally pisses off my parents and relatives but who cares. my kids are fit and have a correct attitude towards food, something that "tradition" screwed me over on when I was a child. I luckily discovered that it was wrong when I was 18 and stopped the habit then.

      Yes you are in control of your weight, you can make the decision to go get the help you need to lose weight. so I agree with you on that one and single point.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    34. Re:What the hell is this? by Golias · · Score: 1
      he only way weightlifting is not an aerobic exercise is if you're doing it wrong. But then you're probably one of those pussies that use less than 300 lbs for bench and deadlift reps.

      Um... You do know that "aerobic" means a low-impact cardiovascular workout with light weights or no weights to raise your heart and breath rates, right?

      What you are thinking of is "anaerobic."

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  7. This is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I can give up my total reliance on masterbating for exercise!

    1. Re:This is great by SirLantos · · Score: 1

      Sure you can give it up, but would you really want to???

      --
      The flying hamster of DOOM rains coconuts on your pitiful city.
    2. Re:This is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Masturbation, what's that all about? Is it good, or is it whack-off?

    3. Re:This is great by TheGrayArea · · Score: 1

      Of course the problem you end up with is that one are is really well developed in comparison to the other.

      --

      This space for rent.
    4. Re:This is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're trading high cycle low strain fatigue on a joystick capable of repairing itself for low cycle high strain fatigue on a joystick that isn't.

      As with all people who give up a primary reliance on self-manipulation, the major casualty will be your pocketbook.

    5. Re:This is great by DreadSpoon · · Score: 1

      It's my sword arm, I swear!

    6. Re:This is great by greygent · · Score: 4, Funny

      Still, it's always good to include masturbation as a part of your fitness regime, for a couple reasons:

      1.) It builds strong forearm muscles (Make sure to swap hands, occasionally for equal development of both forearms. Hey, it's "like a new lover!").

      2.) Good for the prostrate and related muscles.

    7. Re:This is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) It helps your grip too. Much needed for deadlifts. Now, if I could only exercise my left hand now.

    8. Re:This is great by greygent · · Score: 1

      That would explain the recent massive gains in my deadlift weights... damned georgyforgov.com photo gallery...

    9. Re:This is great by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Still, it's always good to include masturbation as a part of your fitness regime, for a couple reasons:

      I assume this is directed towards the male population. Any advice regarding circumcized vs. non-circumcized? Before I start I'd like to have some expert opinion.

  8. typical fitness mistake by selderrr · · Score: 1

    what we need is not more muscle power, but better condition. Having a large bisceps can be trained in far more satisfying games than pumping a gamepad.

    1. Re:typical fitness mistake by flynt · · Score: 1

      Having a large bisceps can be trained in far more satisfying games than pumping a gamepad.

      What you say???!!!

  9. Poo by 0x00000dcc · · Score: 1
    Bah - find me a machine that involved exercise, video games, a love life, advice on stocks, and beer and I'm interested.

    --

    -- (Score:i, Imaginary)

  10. DDR for aerobics, this for strength training? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need $695 to get exercise while gaming. Dance Dance Revolution is pretty good, if you've got a decent pad.
    As long as we're heading toward the exotic, how about a martial arts game that combined a floor pad with location-sensing gloves and a kick/punch bag?

  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being fat is better than working out

  13. Change of tact? by KingDaveRa · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, we're constanly being told to go careful with mice, keyboards and controllers, to avoid RSI and Carpal Tunnel, yet this company is selling something which makes you do the opposite? Apparantly we'll all have massive arms and bodies, but not actually be able to move them.

  14. Pr0n version? by Orion442 · · Score: 1

    Can't wait

  15. Bad news by JoScherl · · Score: 1

    I'm too lazy for making sport so I'd play even less if it would ne sme muscles.

  16. So they're saying... by tuxette · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...that I can get fit and strong by playing computer games the same way I can get a six pack while watching TV by wearing one of those electro-shock belts?

    Woohoo! Bring it on!

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:So they're saying... by Coward+the+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      Now imagine if you play computer games with this joystick AND wear the elctro-shock belt.

      Mr. Universe Contest, here I come.

      --
      -- Jason
    2. Re:So they're saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hat I can get fit and strong by playing computer games the same way I can get a six pack while watching TV by wearing one of those electro-shock belts?
      put the beer on it, then pull it over?

    3. Re:So they're saying... by jabberjaw · · Score: 1

      Of course, because the controller is really coated with a film of Methyl 1-Test. The very notion of exercising with playing a video game is laughable at best. One will not become a fitness model by playing video games, heck one will not even become "tone" by playing video games. Play video games for entertainment lift/run/whatever for fitness, the concept is not that difficult to grasp.

  17. After the first 5 minutes.. by draco+ni · · Score: 1

    After just a couple of minutes of playing Gran Turismo with the joystick, you can feel the strain in your upper arms and shoulder muscles.
    And then you go back and grab your conventional controller, because who only wants to play their game for 5 minutes?! :)

  18. Cool by Timesprout · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now I dont need all those celeb babe fitness videos to get a right arm like Arnie Schwartzenegger

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  19. Please... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is just a gimmick to sell stuff. If you're serious about getting (and staying) fit, put down the controller for half an hour a day (or every other day) and do a physical activity.

    You don't have to go to the gym and work out - you could do a sports activity or even just jog down to the shops and back to get some milk - but it'll be ten times better for you than twiddling your already overdeveloped thumbs.

    Oh, and while you're at it, replace every other can of Coke/Mountain Dew/whatever with a glass of water. Your body will thank you for it.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Please... by WinterSolstice · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, when I am on my cycling trainer, I am playing a game on my PS2 :)
      Check it out:
      The ultimate training accessory
      This way, I get my needed cycling in during the rain, and I can play too.
      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    2. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how many calories it takes to replace the floatsom and jetsum lost in an orgasm? Combining a gamepad like this with DOA, or DOA Beach Volleyball could, single handedly, win the war against flab!

    3. Re:Please... by *weasel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You'd think gyms would pick up on this sort of thing. Network all those exercise bikes into something like a crazy taxi-styled competition.
      Or stairclimbers into some sort of bizarre-o Mega-Man game.

      I feel the patent office calling my name...
      [j/k]

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    4. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Network all those exercise bikes into something like a crazy taxi-styled competition.

      Great. Just what we need. Another reason for jocks to pick on nerds. Nerds are supposed to be GOOD at games, not be beaten on it by some musclebound airhead.

    5. Re:Please... by greygent · · Score: 1

      Even walking a half hour a day has significant health benefits, so you don't even have to jog.

    6. Re:Please... by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      just jog down to the shops and back to get some milk

      Ofcourse, the thing is, if you actually DID do the smart thing and jog down to the shops to buy milk, people would laugh at you. They would say "haha. look at that guy running and buying milk. he's so healthy. hahahaha."

      There's something deeply wrong with a society that works like that.

      The good news is that you don't need to leave your home to get exercise, nor do you have to buy expensive machinery. Start doing daily bicycle crunches, back extensions (if you do stomach exercises you've got to do back exercises too) and push-ups. Do the maximum you can without hurting yourself, do some other exercise or take a break for 5 minutes, then do as much as you can again. Don't forget to breathe while you do these exercises (they call it aerobic exercise for a reason). Add some cycling for the legs and some free-weight weightlifting for the arms (um, so, ok, there's some expense there) and you've pretty much cornered the concept of exercising. After a while of doing this you WILL see the difference, and you'll be happy with it. Doesn't take more than 15 minutes a day. Everyone has 15 minutes. If you're lazy, you can even do it only once every two or three days. You'll still get results, only slower. Works for me anyway. But then IANAFT (I am not a fitness trainer).

    7. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you could do a sports activity or even just jog down to the shops and back to get some milk

      If I ran to the store, I'm not sure what would kill me first, the cars on the road, or running in the 9 deg F air.
    8. Re:Please... by Chillum · · Score: 1

      This has in fact been done - Exertris make an exercise bike where "The energy you put into your pedalling is used in a virtual sense in the games you play. Imagine having to power a spaceship's weapon systems by pedalling, or having to pedal to move your cards around in a game of Solitaire."

    9. Re:Please... by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Not likely it would be a seller. For three months out of the year it's not worth it, and they count on the fact that 99% of the people don't show up after the first month.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    10. Re:Please... by adolf · · Score: 1

      This is just a gimmick to sell stuff.

      Pray tell: What product can I buy today that is not just a gimmick to sell stuff?

  20. good god by searleb · · Score: 0

    now we'll have a bunch of video game nerds with massive bowling-style forearms...

  21. As a computer user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What I'd like is some small device that I can put under my desk and pedal, with my pedaling going into a battery which can then be used by my electronics. I'll save money and build muscle!

  22. This is silly by Schlemphfer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    You buy a game controller for one reason: to have maximum control in a videogame. Anything that interferes with that, including having to exert unnecessary muscle power, makes for a sucky controller.

    As Butt Head once put it so well, "If I wanted to read, I'd go to school."

    And if I wanted to exercise, I'd go outdoors.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    1. Re:This is silly by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      You buy a game controller for one reason: to have maximum control in a videogame. Anything that interferes with that, including having to exert unnecessary muscle power, makes for a sucky controller.

      Damn straight. I owned this controller about ten years ago, or rather the prescience-through-shoddy-quality precursor. That bastard took a ton of force to move, and while I may have gained some arm strength from using it all that happened was I got frustrated with the piece of crap making me die all the time in Double Dragon and went to go play Nintendo instead.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  23. We need a total body workout by tepples · · Score: 1

    DDR builds only the lower body. It's too bad nobody makes a home version of Para Para Paradise, an arm game, or EZ2Dancer, which works both the upper and lower body.

    1. Re:We need a total body workout by Slayk · · Score: 1

      There is a home version of Para Para, though finding it is EXTREMELY hard.

    2. Re:We need a total body workout by ryanwright · · Score: 2, Informative

      DDR builds only the lower body.

      Not if you hang on to a couple of heavy weights and try to keep your balance while playing on heavy...

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    3. Re:We need a total body workout by jx100 · · Score: 2, Funny

      well, Nintendo's going to release Donkey Konga...

    4. Re:We need a total body workout by Beek · · Score: 1

      DDR is aerobic. It does not build any muscle. In fact, it burns it.

    5. Re:We need a total body workout by tepples · · Score: 1

      All strenuous exercise burns muscle; it's the recovery period afterward that builds it back up. Lifting builds strength and size; aerobic exercise builds endurance. In addition, I dispute the notion that DDR is always aerobic: try beating a 10-footer without going lactic.

    6. Re:We need a total body workout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      There's an open-source clone of DDR called stepmania that also supports EZ2Dancer. I don't know for sure if it supports Para Para Paradise in the latest version, but I think they're trying to work most of the other music-game formats into it.

    7. Re:We need a total body workout by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      That would at best only strengthen your forearms, and at worst, put unnecessary and damaging stress on your elbow and shoulder joints.

    8. Re:We need a total body workout by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Aerobic exercise burns fat and muscule. Resistance training rips muscule which gets bigger as your body repairs it by growing additional muscule.

    9. Re:We need a total body workout by GTRacer · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It does not build any muscle.

      Tell that to my legs...my calves and thighs are incredibly toned and solid after many moons of DDR and not much else exercise. I used to have the typical pasty flabby geek legs - now they're pasty beefcake geek legs!

      GTRacer
      - Also uses hand weights to balance out the toning

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    10. Re:We need a total body workout by GTRacer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Or even better, set up a nonstop course of low-difficulty songs with alternating footsteps, and then "box" while holding hand weights. As long as the steps are fairly alternated, you can get a pretty smooth workout top and bottom.

      Trying to mix in uppercuts however, tends to cause misses because of the vertical weight shift.

      GTRacer
      - Hey Yo Captain Jack!

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    11. Re:We need a total body workout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI it's spelled "muscle".

    12. Re:We need a total body workout by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Personally, my legs were never flabby. Carrying around the rest of my body everywhere has made sure that that's one of the few parts of my body that is actually solid.

      Most people try to get a 'six-pack'; I'm quite happy with my keg.

    13. Re:We need a total body workout by flewp · · Score: 1

      What about if you switch off between doing it with your legs and then doing handstands?

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    14. Re:We need a total body workout by sanchny · · Score: 1

      Yup, same here. Playing Heavy is not only insane fun, but also a great leg workout.
      Also, I've found that it's a decent ab/stomach workout. You're obviously not going to get a 6 pack from it, but I've found that the motions from quickly lifting your legs works out the stomach area some. Back when I started I used to get the tingly/pain post-workout feeling after playing.

    15. Re:We need a total body workout by tepples · · Score: 1

      Playing Heavy is not only insane fun

      Do I have to be able to pass "Max 300" on heavy in order to be considered a competent DDR player?

    16. Re:We need a total body workout by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unless you're one of those mythical female geeks, I do not want to hear about what your legs look like.

    17. Re:We need a total body workout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but I've found that the motions from quickly lifting your legs works out the stomach area some. Back when I started I used to get the tingly/pain post-workout feeling after playing.

      That's just you becoming a woman.

      congradulations :)

    18. Re:We need a total body workout by sanchny · · Score: 1
      That's just you becoming a woman.

      Does that explain the blood...?

    19. Re:We need a total body workout by sanchny · · Score: 1
      Do I have to be able to pass "Max 300" on heavy in order to be considered a competent DDR player?

      Does it really matter? Personally, I don't care. I'll just play to have fun. I'll play the Maxes once in a while to burn out at the end, but I play mostly 8 and 7 footers.

      The competition is the one thing I hate about DDR. "I AAAed LOM WITH A HUGE DUMP IN MY PANTS!" Good for you. If you consider spazzing out to PSM Oni "fun," then more power to ya.
      But what other people think of your abilities shouldn't interfere with your fun.

    20. Re:We need a total body workout by zaffir · · Score: 1

      DDR is still a mostly aerobic workout. All cardiovascular. 30 minutes in the gym 3 times a week for a month will do more for your muscle mass than a year of DDR.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    21. Re:We need a total body workout by Krellan · · Score: 1

      As somebody else said, Konami does make a home version of Para Para Paradise.

      http://www.konamijpn.com/products/parapara/index.h tml

      Unfortunately, the Para Para fad died out in Japan around the same time the home game came out, so only one home game was made. Because of the extremely low difficulty level, and the inability to edit your own "steps", it gets boring quickly.

      The game uses a very unique controller! It is a set of 5 infrared sensors that are placed in a semicicle on the ground, and they detect your hand movements by noticing when your hands pass over them. In this way, the game notices when you extend your arms in various directions.

      Because only one home game was released, there was little demand for the controllers. Konami actually overproduced the controllers! They can be found for as little as 500 yen (roughly $5)!

      http://search.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/search?sb=desc& desc=%a5%d1%a5%e9%a5%d1%a5%e9+%a5%d1%a5%e9%a5%c0%a 5%a4%a5%b9&acc=jp&&f=0x12&at=true&alocale= 0jp
      (Good luck with this URL, Slashdot may mangle it)

      Unfortunately, shipping to the US is a killer, as you must go through third-party services since Japanese typically pay through internal bank transfers (an option unavailable to those outside Japan). A very good service that I would recommend is Rinkya.

      http://www.rinkya.com/

      I have PPP and two controllers. Despite its problems, PPP is still a very good game. The background graphics are incredible and hypnotic, and all of the songs are good (if you like Eurobeat and J-Pop). The actual game disc itself is harder to find than the controllers. If you can find it, get it!

      BTW, the controller is a standard USB device, and it will show up properly. However, the sensors will not register, as evidently it has some kind of lockout! If I had access to a USB bus sniffer, I would try to see what it is that prevents the controllers from working. If somebody were to reverse-engineer it, it would be great, because there would be all kinds of fun applications for these controllers!

  24. If you want a workout by ilsie · · Score: 4, Funny

    try playing Soul Calibur II with a Dance Dance Revolution pad.

    1. Re:If you want a workout by big_groo · · Score: 1
      Funny as this may be, has anyone actually tried one of those arcade boxing games, where you have to duck and weave and you hold onto 'gloves' and actually punch? What a workout.

      Where can I buy one of those?

    2. Re:If you want a workout by Teppy · · Score: 1

      Yes. The best blend of fun/exercise I've experienced in a game. Much of the increased difficulty of the later opponents is due to your own exhaustion.

      I see a future version of a gym which is based entirely on physically controlled video games. Does this exist yet?

    3. Re:If you want a workout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why have videogames to workout with if you've got friends?

      the best workouts and fun I've ever had was with a game me and some friends came up with to play in one of them's parents' unfinished basement:

      Mini Hockey.

      We armored ourselves the best we could with whatever equipment we had, and played "hockey" in teams of two, using a tennis ball and collectible miniature hockey sticks that are a little over a foot long.

      Wearing a helmet was especially important, as one time I was checked *through* the closed door to the room in which we played. Thankfully, all I got was a few scratches and some wood splinters to remove with tweezers.

    4. Re:If you want a workout by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a friend who is a professional fighter try that. He punched so fast that it registered it as a slow one. I think it needs to be upgraded to 128bit so it can record punches faster the 90miles per hour.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:If you want a workout by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      No, but I've been thinking about starting one...

      The trick is convincing the mass populous it would work. The general public isn't ready yet. They equate games with fat, and so turning that concept on it's head is pretty hard.

      There's also the rafting game (Try one player, see if you don't work up a sweat!).

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    6. Re:If you want a workout by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Funny as this may be, has anyone actually tried one of those arcade boxing games, where you have to duck and weave and you hold onto 'gloves' and actually punch? What a workout.

      Yeah, that game is great, although it doesn't record your movement fast enough all the time.. and you kinda gotta slow down a bit and match the pace of the game. On that note, though, Ever seen the Eye Toy for PS2? My girlfriend's Aunt showed us that thing, it's effin' great, it's got it's own disc o' games that comes with it, nothing special, boxing, a soccer 'bounce the ball on your head' game, a game where you wash windows, a couple dancing games.. but damn it's fun, and you'll catch a good workout from it after playing a few games. I got one for my parents for Xmas this year and they absolutely love it. That thing will actually give you a little bit of a workout by the time you're done as well.

      -matt

    7. Re:If you want a workout by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      I had the most fun with this when I lived in Erie. The machine wasn't always there-- but it was the last time I was in town (about a week before Christmas). It's by Konami, and I don't remember the exact name of it, unfortunately. I think something like "MoCap Boxing" or something similar. Anyway, there's also a similar game called "Police 911"-- it combines the duck-and-cover style of play with a Virtua Cop shooting element. Come to think of it... that could easily be done on the PS2 now, with the Eyetoy and a Guncon. Anyway, yeah, thanks for reminding me of this game.

      Speaking of Konami games, a lot of people have mentioned DDR, but Para Para Paradise and Dance Freaks offer full-body dance challenges. Unfortunately, those games haven't caught on so much in the US-- certainly not to the extent that DDR has-- but I imagine it would be a hell of a lot more efficient than screwing around with a broken controller.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  25. Nothing New by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Atari already had this back around 1980. It was calls the 2600. Remember my young wrists nearly sprained after an all night Pac Man marathon. Never had a srained wrist after that even though I experienced a number of nasty falls skate boarding.

  26. In other news... by jonDear · · Score: 1

    Thousands and thousands of Xbox and PS2 controllers are rendered useless. Broken joysticks caused from "trying to go faster."

    1. Re: In other news... by fafaforza · · Score: 2, Funny

      The progress of technology crawled to a halt after the performance of software compilers and other critical system functionalities were tied directly to the physical performance of software engineers.

      Experts in the field were quoted as saying that the majority of software development is now done on the equivalent of 486/MHz machines.

  27. Soon.. by vjmurphy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The nerds and geeks, with their low carb diets and new, isometric gamepads, will become a force to recon with!

    At the beach, no longer will we have to feel the humilation of the muscle-headed jerks kicking sand into our faces when we are chatting up the bikini -clad hotties! We'll be doing the kicking.

    Rather, we would be, but we have to get past the next track in Project Gotham Racing 2, back up our clan in Socom II, and hit level 65 in Everquest.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  28. building muscle? by qbproger · · Score: 1

    Well my DDR pad works well enough for me. Besides that if I gain too much muscles I'll look odd with my friends.

    --

    - Joe
  29. Aha! by AgentOJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now we know how the characters from Final Fantasy VII got their physiques! To gain their popeye-esque arm structure they used this gaming pad!

  30. Hmm, gimmick input device? by podoboo · · Score: 1

    This can't go wrong!

  31. I feel a mastercard commercial coming on. by numbski · · Score: 1

    Average age of people who buy excercise equipment: 31 years

    Average age of a video game buyer:
    29 years

    Number of years of wasted education trying to come up with a good excuse to play games all day long instead of work:

    Kernal Panic!
    We're hanging here....

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:I feel a mastercard commercial coming on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang your head in shame man; that was terrible.

  32. going to try something like this by Raleel · · Score: 1

    me and a friend are gonna workout using Dance Dance Revolution and a good diet (the second we already do pretty good).

    We have yet to see a fat DDR player :)

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:going to try something like this by flewp · · Score: 1

      You haven't been to Wisconsin, have you?

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  33. Didn't Work on My Atari Controllers by Filmwatcher888 · · Score: 0

    How many did I sacrafice to Track and Field? Still didn't count as a workout.

  34. Sweat by verloren · · Score: 2, Funny

    So now you get to be the sweaty fat kid in gym class, but in the comfort of your own home.

  35. Clever, but... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

    A lot of games require several moves of the joystick per second (fighting combos, etc). How many folks, even in great shape, can make gross (as opposed to fine) motions that fast?

    I'm a tall guy. Even if I was skinny, I'd be 200 lbs. That's a LOT of weight to move quickly, without hurting myself...

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    1. Re:Clever, but... by tepples · · Score: 1

      A lot of games require several moves of the joystick per second (fighting combos, etc). How many folks, even in great shape, can make gross (as opposed to fine) motions that fast?

      You think the button commands in 2D fighters are tough? Try this game. One of the levels, called "Max 300", makes the player do a 33-button combo in 3.3 seconds... with his feet.

    2. Re:Clever, but... by snarkh · · Score: 1
      I'm a tall guy. Even if I was skinny, I'd be 200 lbs. That's a LOT of weight to move quickly, without hurting myself...

      Hm... I've heard Michael Jordan was pretty tall too.

    3. Re:Clever, but... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      yup. About an inch taller than me, as a matter of fact. I'd guess that he was about 220.

      And professional ATHLETES aren't exactly the target for this thing, you know?

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    4. Re:Clever, but... by snarkh · · Score: 1

      Right, my point is that being tall does not necessarily imply that you cannot move fast.
      I am not saying that you have to be as fast as MJ, of course.

    5. Re:Clever, but... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      ah. Yeah. I was just thinking that someone (such as myself) who wasn't in great shape is likely to hurt themselves using that many 'fast twitch' muscles...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  36. The Kilowatt controller? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    Ouch, that's gotta hurt. At least it isn't the Megawatt controller, or the Gigawatt controller. "Guaranteed to turn you into a smoking crisp!"

    1. Re:The Kilowatt controller? by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      or even the dreaded....Jigawatt controller!!

  37. Two problems I can see... by hiryuu · · Score: 1

    Problem the first: the tensile strength of any joystick/analog stick required is going to be much higher than in the regular el-cheapo controllers.

    Problem the second: overdeveloped thumbs and puny everything-else. :P

    --
    Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
  38. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by greenskyx · · Score: 1

    Dance Dance Revolution! ... I'm not sure their product can match DDR's popularity though...

  39. Hardcore gamers who use this pad.. by Jerdie · · Score: 1

    will have certain muscles in the arms and back bulging out while others(like the legs, and heart) are left weak. At least they could have there be bike pedals, then the gamer would get a good full body workout(or some semblance.)

    --
    Programming is simply the application of logic to creativity
  40. hmmm by rogabean · · Score: 1

    The article fails to mention what iIconsider to be a major selling point, if in fact this device even takes off. Will it be supported by all games?
    They only mention Grand Turismo, being a racing game.

    Though honestly I can't see the average gamer having even a remote interest in this device as even the average gamers play games for extended periods of time. Who would want to be working out that whole time?

    I smell another "interesting idea not going anywhere" device. Reminds me of the Power Glove.

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
  41. Aerobics by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Most people (the fat guy in the picture in the BBC article, for example) need aerobic exercise a lot more than isometrics or weight training.

    As a poster above said, DDR will work a lot better at getting us all in shape.

  42. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by ilsie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    RTFA. The article is about an isometric controller. The Powerpad just had a bunch of buttons. Dont get me wrong, I still think it will be a flop, especially at $700 a pop.

  43. We'll know who is using it... by mcasson · · Score: 0

    Due to the performance limitations that this controller will impose, only the sucky individuals will use this...I guess it will give more weight to their statement when they say, "at least I can kick your ass!"

    --
    I've already said all that I have to say.
  44. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by flynt · · Score: 1

    While perhaps a flop, it was still fun doing the long jump in track and field by grabbing onto the rafters after you jumped and hanging there for a few seconds. The game would know if you waited too long to jump back on that you were cheating.

  45. Wish I'd had one as a youth by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    If I had that when I was little, I'd be an ironman triathlete right now! I hope they can get the price to come down, I know a lot of overweight kids that play games all the time. If they could get one, they'd totally do it. Or, perhaps the DDR pad could be made compatible with other games.

    --
    stuff |
  46. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by dustinbarbour · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had a PowerPad! I'd play World Class Track Meet on it with my friends. My parents hated it since my room was upstairs and you could hear our pounding and running from the other side of the house. It was great!

  47. Old Idea by banda · · Score: 1

    The Yugo I drove in college worked on the same principle: The harder I pushed, the faster I could make it go.

  48. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

    It flopped, but it does look like todays market has changed
    Time for some DDR!

    --
    "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
  49. Woo Hoo by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome our freakishly strong forearmed child overlords.

    Seriously -- rememeber the Chris Farley Skit: "My God, these Hideously Oversized and Freakishly Strong Children Will Surely Rise Up And Destroy Us?"

  50. DDR is for you by tepples · · Score: 1

    find me a machine that involved exercise, video games, a love life, advice on stocks, and beer

    Exercise and video games: Dance Dance Revolution by Konami.

    A love life: The gathering of players of both sexes at arcades that have a DDR machine may lead to the beginning of a relationship.

    Advice on stocks: Buy Konami.

    Beer: Unfortunately, this is the only hard part. Most arcades I've visited do not serve alcoholic beverages, and I don't know how many bars have DDR machines next to their video slot machines. However, you can still buy the home version, get your friends, and play during the Super Bowl, between commercials. (Who watches it for the football anymore?)

    Learn more about DDR

    1. Re:DDR is for you by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      There's an arcade in downtown calgary, alberta is also a lounge that serves alcohol. Separate areas though. BUt you can enjoy a cold one and walk 20 feet and enjoy some DDR...

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:DDR is for you by Infinite93 · · Score: 1

      That's what Dave and Buster's is for. Sports bar full of all the team/racing games.

    3. Re:DDR is for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they have DDR? That'd be interesting to see people playing it there.

    4. Re:DDR is for you by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      DB rocks. I went to one while on vacation once. At the time they had many of the sit in video games(driving, flying, meching) and after having a few drinks it was great watching others try to play :)

  51. Guy in the BBC article by joey+shabadu · · Score: 0

    could sure use this thing, bad.

  52. Possibly, if the thing didn't cost so much... by joshamania · · Score: 1

    Lessee here...this thing costs just shy of my PS2, XBox *and* GameCube. *AND* all the games I own for them.

  53. Mudcycle by Godeke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Best encouragment I made for myself to exercise was attaching a low power (386) computer with a terminal program to a stationary bike. Strap the keyboard in an accessable place and play muds for a while... amazing what motivation to not die in a dungeon will do for you.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
  54. better games available by mabu · · Score: 1

    I've always been enthralled by the idea of integrating technology into exercise so that people were more motivated to engage in cardiovascular activities. One of the best examples of this is the Dance Dance video game. One can't deny that getting good at the game is directly proportional to how in shape you are. In a market dominated by games where people hone skills such as shooting people, it's a refreshing change. Disney Quest also has some interesting video games that involve lots of physical effort and something like their giant human pinball simulation is an all-around exercise.

    Now what we need is some kind of game plug-in that exposes players to sunlight and gets their Seratonin levels up to norm.

    1. Re:better games available by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      That would be the original GBA. You can't play that goddamned thing using normal lights indoors...

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:better games available by lysander · · Score: 1
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.

      your insurance covers robots?

      seriously, a quality skit. :)

      --
      GET YOUR WEAPONS READY! --DR.LIGHT
  55. Counterstrike Pad by supersmike · · Score: 1

    If they had the Counterstrike pad, I'd buy it. Something that forced you do do all the running, jumping and crouching (in-place I'd assume, but still taxing) that you would do in a game of CS, and somehow fed it back to the game- that would be cool.

    1. Re:Counterstrike Pad by servognome · · Score: 1

      They have something like this... its called paintball :)

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:Counterstrike Pad by supersmike · · Score: 1

      Heh, heh. You are so right. The last (and only) time I did paintball, I thought I was going to have a heart attack.

  56. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 1

    Nintendo had this, it was called the power pad [defunctgames.com]. It was a flop. What has changed in today's world that will make it successful?

    The industry has changed, as well as the target demographic (30 year old males). Perhaps if you RTFA.

    Sig Feil!

  57. Lost cause. by arty3 · · Score: 1

    This is like trying to get fit by skipping the cheese on you double whopper combo. It's already too late so just give it up.

  58. What's the point? by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's $700. Case closed. Put down the joypad for 1/2 hr and walk around in circles if you must.

    Seriously, I know this chick that disconnected the power steering cable from her car so she can work out her arms while she's driving. It works - her arm muscles are spectacular, but I guess safety issues be damned.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    1. Re:What's the point? by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
      It's $700. Case closed. Put down the joypad for 1/2 hr and walk around in circles if you must.

      I've been reading through the comments so far and it just dawned on me after seeing your comment.. I had a membership at a boxing gym that was 300/yr, I could get a MUCH better workout going to a boxing class 5 days a week for 2 years than I can playing these video games... now I mean, it's kinda hard to find an hour of free time to go these days, but even if you can find the time twice a week it makes an amazing difference.. now all I need is to find 300 in expendable funds that I can use to get back into it ;) Those bastards will MAKE you get in shape.

      -matt

  59. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by nojomofo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought that the best part was having the "full-contact 100-meter dash", where in the running races it was fair game to push the guy next to you off of the pad.

  60. Comic book ads by anachattak · · Score: 1
    I can see it now: the classic comic book ad, with the buff guy kicking sand in the face of the puny weakling.

    The weakling complains that the stupid gaming-jock gets all the girls, while the outdoor athlete just gets bullied.

    Soon, they all turn nerd, thanks to PowerPad!!!

    ...or something like that...

  61. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by Ondo · · Score: 1

    Nintendo had this, it was called the power pad. It was a flop. What has changed in today's world that will make it successful?

    The power pad is nearly identical to the Dance Dance Revolution pads, which are quite succesful. The difference is not the hardware, it's the software.

    This product will almost certainly flop, because it doesn't have any games designed for it, so there almost certaintly won't be any games that are more fun using it. As well as being much too expensive.

  62. Okay, well then, you try. :P by numbski · · Score: 1

    So mine wasn't funny. You KNOW this is begging for one.

    Go ahead, fix my pathetic joke.

    Make my day...punk.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  63. won-eyed girl/online dating design to billed on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the desperate lonliness of introverted hobbyists?

    how cruel.

  64. bad trademarks by squarefish · · Score: 1

    looks like they got one on kiloWatt

    I hope they don't try to sue my friends

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  65. Doesn't that defeat the purpose? by chickenwing · · Score: 1

    If we wanted physical exertion, we would go outside and play with the rest of the kids.

  66. Not bad by caswelmo · · Score: 1

    I kind of like the idea, just not the implementation. When I was rehabilitating an ACL reconstruction they had this stupid little game on the console of the exercise bike. It was just an LCD light moving around a circle according to how fast I pedalled. I was racing another LCD light that was controlled by the speed setting. It was incredibly simple but somehow darn entertaining as well. It would seem to me that some sort of simple yet well done game hooked up to a bike could be mildly entertaining. Perhaps a specialized wheel speed reader that sends data through the standard Xbox controller port? Anyway, I'm obviously easily entertained.

  67. isometric training != fitness/strength by teneighty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This controller does not involve a significant range of motion - essentially the controller involves isometric holds. This is just a $10 word word meaning that you push against a static object as hard as you can (e.g pushing against a wall - it doesn't move, but it still requires effort on your part). Isometric training is sometimes incorporated as part of a controversial training style known as "super slow" (I can't say if it works or not - I get the impression that the evidence is that at best, it's not an efficient way to train). In short - sure, it's better than nothing, but it's a LONG way from being a device that seriously combines gaming and fitness. For years, I have dreamed of combining fitness and gaming (particuly for FPS games and side-scrolling arcade games). I believe it can be done, and have some strong ideas to make it work. PS: Does anyone know who might be hiring in this field? (I'm a software guy - I need to work with mechanical engineers and EE guys - building these devices is very much a multi-discplinary team effort)

    1. Re:isometric training != fitness/strength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some isometric strength training exercises as part of my routine, and it has its uses.

      I wouldn't recommend doing *only* that form of exercise, but it does enable one to develop *some* muscles which cannot be developped through weight lifting or other forms of exercise. It is certainly a valid form of complementary exercise.

      One obvious example I can think of is some breathing exercises practised in Yoga, tai chi and other chinese martial arts, to get a stronger diaphragm, which, for those who dont know, a bell-shaped muscle.

      There are multiple ways to be fit. That's why there are so many types of different professional / olympic-level sports. I cant imagine an olympic weight lifter being very good at sprinting. or gymnastics.

  68. Still pumped from using the mouse by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

    To quote Dilbert. I wonder if they'll make these things PC Compatible? The Xbox I got free for signing up with Speakeasy goes unused except when I have a LAN party, and one person has to swap out of a game (or doesn't want to play it).

    --

    That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

  69. oh look, another lying sack of shit US-hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh bullshit. This is not 'recommending we eat junk food':

    "Steiger said in his letter that the WHO report did not adequately address an individual's responsibility to balance one's diet with one's physical activities, and objected to singling out specific types of foods, such as those high in fat and sugar.

    "The (U.S. government) favors dietary guidance that focuses on the total diet, promotes the view that all foods can be part of a healthy and balanced diet, and supports personal responsibility to choose a diet conducive to individual energy balance, weight control and health," wrote Steiger, special assistant for international affairs at Health and Human Services. "

    1. Re:oh look, another lying sack of shit US-hater by Eyah....TIMMY · · Score: 1

      Dude, relax a little

      --

      It is not enough to have a good mind. The main thing is to use it well. - Rene Descartes (1637)
    2. Re:oh look, another lying sack of shit US-hater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, stop lying a little

      What's that? Uncomfortable being called a LIAR? Don't like it very much? Well isn't that just too bad... considering that you actually are a LIAR.

  70. Ok, how much of you.. by SlashDread · · Score: 1

    had as first thought, -ooh- GT3, must... have...

    "/Dread"

  71. Not really by tuxette · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While aerobic exercise is good for aiding in fat loss, muscle-building exercise is better in the long run, as muscle increases metabolism and fat burning, even when you're not exercising.

    The traditional way of doing aerobics (low impact long duration) only burns fat for the duration of the session but it doesn't do anything for after you have exercised. It has been shown in lots of peer-reviewed studies that high-intensity interval training (mix of sprints and lower intensity running/cycling etc) is superior for fat burning because after a workout session, your body continues to burn fat, whereas you do not achieve this during a low impact low intensity workout.

    One thing to think about - look at sprinters and look at marathon runners. Sprinters are lean and mean. They train for explosive power. Marathon runners on the other hand, while skinny, are rather flabby...

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:Not really by Trevin · · Score: 1

      That's precisely why I prefer Billy Blanks' Tae-Bo over other aerobics, say, Richard Simmons' "Dance Your Pants Off".

    2. Re:Not really by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 1

      That is the typical wisdom... more muscles, more weight loss. However, most people don't look at this solution for the long run. More muscle also means more maintenance. If you can bench press 300, you'd better be at the gym 5 days a week to maintain that muscle. If you don't, you'll lose the muscle and it'll just turn into... fat. On the other hand, if you are relatively slim with good cardiovascular health and few muscles, running/jogging/biking can help you lose some fat and not gain muscle that has to be maintained. You can do what I do, and start running when you want to drop 10 or so pounds, and then stop and not have to worry about it all coming back. Of course, both of those situations assume no significant change in diet. You can always lose/gain weight by changing diet!

      --

      Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    3. Re:Not really by djeaux · · Score: 2, Interesting
      One thing to think about - look at sprinters and look at marathon runners. Sprinters are lean and mean. They train for explosive power. Marathon runners on the other hand, while skinny, are rather flabby...

      Actually, there's a genetic difference between sprinters & distance runners, which is why very, very few people successfully crossover between the two sports. And the difference in appearance betweens sprinters & marathoners is the difference between someone who can focus on "bulking up" muscles for a short-duration activity and someone who focusses on oxygen transport & nutrient loading for a long haul. (I might also point out that those "flabby" distance runners can't afford to haul a lot of extra mass.)

      Sprinters have a higher proportion of fast-twitch muscle fibers, while distance runners have a higher proportion of slow-twitch fibers. Muscle tissue of an "average male" is about 55% fast-twitch. Sprinters are about 63% fast twitch, and marathon runners are about 18% fast twitch. The distance runner doesn't need to "bulk up," because his/her slow twitch ratio is already so high. A sprinter bulks up to increase the fast twitch mass.

      The difference is hereditary. Elite athletes are "freaks" compared with average people. I might also add that anabolic steroids are popular with sprinters, while they are actually detrimental to distance runners because they increase the runner's weight.

      Fast twitch fibers supply their energy anaerobically (mainly through glycolysis), because during very fast exercise, there's little time for complete aerobic cellular respiration. After exercise, they have to pay off oxygen debt. Slow twitch fibers have a rich blood supply & rely on aerobic respiration for their energy.

      Depending on the game, a presssure-sensitive game controller might require fast action, but I rather doubt that there would be enough sustained "exercise" involved to do much to build up either fast or slow twitch fibers.

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    4. Re:Not really by Karadryel · · Score: 1
      While aerobic exercise is good for aiding in fat loss, muscle-building exercise is better in the long run, as muscle increases metabolism and fat burning, even when you're not exercising.

      Yes, although ideally you'd also like to exercise your heart, lungs, etc.

      As with everything, you need a balance. If people would take the time they spend looking for a silver bullet and just follow the same basic advice that's worked forever, they'd be a lot better off. Mix your workouts, keep it interesting, and stop trying to hack your body.

    5. Re:Not really by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Note that I said nothing about weight loss. I was only indicating which one people are in more dire need of.

  72. PS2 owners get in shape for $100 by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you already have a PlayStation 2 console, that's a different story. Just buy a BNS DX-Xtreme pad and DDRMAX2 for about $100 incl. shipping. That'll get your lower body in shape.

  73. sorry bad link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    friends

    I should use preview more often...

  74. The fundamental problem with this by Illissius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is that your average gamer doesn't neglect exercise because he can't exercise, but rather because he doesn't *want* to exercise. If he does, then in that case he'll use equipment specially designed for such, but no one will want to use an almost certainly inferior gamepad just because it happens to also be almost certainly inferior exercise equipment as well. (The traditional "do one thing, but do it well", argument... whose applicability is debatable in the case of closely related and easily combined electronics stuff, but not in the gamepad + exercise equipment case. What's next, an all-in-one flat panel LCD + screwdriver? :/)

    --
    Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
  75. Excuse the exercise, or a way to participate? by dexterpexter · · Score: 2, Informative

    The system works on the principle of isometric exercise, which contracts the muscles without moving any joints. After just a couple of minutes of playing Gran Turismo with the joystick, you can feel the strain in your upper arms and shoulder muscles.

    This sounds to me like another item to add to the hundreds we use that cause carpal tunnel syndrome and other repetitive stress disorders. Now, instead of just mildly turning the joystick over and over again, there is resistance that will add to the strain. This doesn't see like its at healthy as it first appears. Exercise indeed, but what I believe these sports medicine professionals are missing is the fact that unlike lifting weights or other people who exercise for health reasons, gamers do not typically stop playing after a short one-hour workout. (Good, healthy workouts are usually about that long) Gamers sometimes sit in front of those games for hours and hours; having repetitive moments with muscular tension could actually harm the muscles instead of build them up. It would seem that this is a great idea for the health nut looking for an interesting way to lose weight as these people would play for an hour and stop, but this is not a particularly great excuse for gamers to exercise. The company should stick with the idea of putting these in gyms, but perhaps skip the idea of a marketing this to a hardcore, overweight RPGer.


    However, I think that if used in moderation, I suppose this is an excuse (note: I said excuse, and its not a particularly great one) to exercise. But perhaps they should look at marketing this, instead of as a piece of exercise equipment, as a way to physically enjoy the games. Anyone remember when Nintendo made the the large floor pad so that you could really run and control the track game? It was great not because of the exercise but because one got to really participate in the game. Maybe applying this to VR, anyone?

    .
    In the end, however, one thing holds true:
    This device makes a perfect symbolic comment on our culture.

    --

    *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
    "We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms."
    1. Re:Excuse the exercise, or a way to participate? by teneighty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In a society that strives to remove effort from anything that might seem like - the horror - work, we need every excuse to exercise that we can get (most people don't even get out their car to open the garage door, after the quick run down to McDonald's drive-thru two blocks down the street).

      Let's face it - if we don't carefully diguise the exercise as fun, few people will do it. This is why obesity is a growing problem (pun intended). So game controllers that involve genuine exercise are definitely something we ant to see.

      That said, the device in the article isn't going to help, and yes, I agree it has potential to cause injury.

    2. Re:Excuse the exercise, or a way to participate? by dexterpexter · · Score: 1

      I sort of agree and sort of do not. I think that alot of the obesity problems (at least, the ones caused by overeating and no exercise) are the result of a lack of self-control. That said, giving people video games as a crutch or excuse isn't treating the cause, its treating the symptoms. Perhaps the surface goal of getting people thinner will be met, but without the tools to maintain that, the people will eventually return to their previous states. People need to learn to take responsibility for themselves and make excellent decisions for themselves, even when those decisions are not convenient.

      A poor analogy, but if a child insists on making phonecalls after you have grounded them from the phone, simply taking the phone away from them does nothing but prevent them from talking on the phone. It does not address the fact that something is causing said child to disobey and talk on the phone in the first place. They will simply replace that phone with another manifestation of not listening and will not have learned a lesson. The parents treated the symptoms (by taking away the phone, the child cannot talk on the phone), but not the cause (the child purposely disobeyed). An admittedly poor anaology, but let me reconcile this with the situation at hand. The parents buying their children devices such as the one mentioned in the article (and the adults buying them as well) have learned nothing about the mental aspect of losing weight. They are not following through on an act to make themselves skinnier and would not if it meant that they had to eat less and walk more. The only reason that they are exercising is because it is linked to their game. However, ten years down the road when they have moved on to the Playstation 6, and like the Nintendo game pad of the late 80's this devices loses its fad appeal, you will have a bunch of fat videogamers who have no self control and no real skills in losing weight. The doctors treated the symptoms (the fat), but not the cause (lack of self control).

      If a person's only excuse to exercise is because they can play a video game while doing so, they I do not see them ultimately having the willpower to lose weight, and probably won't.

      But sadly, as someone who knows a 13 year old gamer who weighs in the 200's, a part of me wants to agree because getting that self control in him won't happen overnight, and I would do anything to get him to lose weight before he becomes morbidly obese. And that breaks my heart.

      --

      *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
      "We are Linux. Resistance is measured in Ohms."
    3. Re:Excuse the exercise, or a way to participate? by davew2040 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It's only symbolic if it becomes popular. Say what you will about their motivations coming from the world they observe around them.

      As it stands, it's only a stupid idea that symbolizes how overall stupid this particular company is.

  76. While everyone is saying "go outside" by Dracolytch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, I'm reading a lot of reponses that are angry people saying "WTF is this? Go outside if you want exercise". Well... I guess it's time to relate what's going on with me.

    I don't like gyms. They're expensive, and between going there, getting my exercise, and coming back, they take up too much of my time. Oh yeah, they're REALLY boring, which means I won't go.

    I hate jogging. It sucks, especially in the winter. It's boring, and it's not safe in my area (thugz & moron drivers).

    I ~love~ swimming, but I can only do that during the summer. Swim at a gym? See gyms above.

    I'm a dedicated gamer, and I'm a bit overweight. I've been wanting to change that, and I have.

    Every day, after work, I come home, and I put in Dance Dance Revolution Max 2. I'm getting up to "normal" difficulty, and am now burning 600 calories a DAY. As I get better, I may increase that, or I just may do my 600/day in less time.

    I've already 6 pounds lighter since the first of the year. The only change I've made in my diet is a reduction to 1 soda a day (instead of 2-3).

    So, while I read a lot of people sitting back and yelling "Go outside fatass", this fatass is giving y'all the finger, staying home, playing videogames, and getting fit.

    ~D
    http://www.dracosoftware.com

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  77. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    We've had 20 years of the fattening of America's youth, and people are finally starting to take notice.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  78. Kill your Playstation? by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The phrase often used about 10 years ago was "Kill your TV" as response to the mindlessness of people who watch TV like drones for several hours a day.

    The fact that they are developing this for, what would be my guess, a substitute to "real exercise" makes me wonder: Have we gone too far?

    Will people 10 years from now be saying:

    Kill your Playstation!
    Kill your Computer! Kill your Internet Connection!

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  79. Yes, but then again no... by Otto · · Score: 1

    While I agree that adding large amounts of resistance to a controller is a dumb idea, a controller can be used for more than simple control. Look at force feedback for example. While it's not implemented very well in a lot of systems, it provides good information that can help with gameplay.

    In a driving game, to pick the simplest example, the looseness of the wheel could be correlated to the slipperiness of the road surface, much as it is in the Real Life (tm) system.

    Controllers with no resistance at all (a lot of early joysticks) don't provide the correct feel for a game. It should be hard to pull back on the stick, to some extent, in a flight sim game. That sort of thing.

    What would be really nice is a controller with variable resistance that could be controlled by the game itself, to provide feedback on whatever makes the most sense. This has been done, but in only the most rudimentary fashion, really.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Yes, but then again no... by haystor · · Score: 1

      This controller might have one good use:

      Getting people to stop playing so many video games. Then maybe they'll exercise...

      --
      t
    2. Re:Yes, but then again no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we can be better people like you, right smartass?

    3. Re:Yes, but then again no... by haystor · · Score: 1

      Truly, I was mocking the controller and not the people playing video games. I certainly play enough computer games to qualify as someone that needs to play fewer games. Then again, it's a clean healthy hobby compared to that meth lab I had going a while back.

      I can see where maybe you thought I was one of those holier-than-though "I don't watch TV" guys. Trust me, that's not it. I think the controller is the right idea wrong implementation and the only good it will do is if a mother wants their son playing fewer games, she installs it and throws out the regular controllers.

      I suppose I could have just said, "it looks like it sucks."

      --
      t
  80. This is Great News.... by I+Hate+Spam+Alot · · Score: 1

    Now I wont have to tell my kid to go out side and play... exposing her to the sun... she can stay inside and become a pale /. reading geek like me! :)

  81. Niggawatts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It takes 1.21 Niggawatts to send your white-boy ass back to the fucha'.

    -- GNAA

  82. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they might market to fitness centers. The thought of drawing in previously unavailable markets might make it a big sell. Some competitive racing at a fitness centre might just draw in the people that find fitness centre boring.

  83. I tried this thing at CES by ChristopherD · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some friends of mine and I took turns trying this device out at CES running Gran Turismo. It looked like all games should work on it, because it has a full complement of PS controls and buttons on it, including dual shoulder buttons. The consensus among the group after using it for a few minutes each? BLECH! I found it unintuitive as to how to move the device to control the car in a specific direction. It sort of made sense, but required hitting one of the gamepad buttons to put the car into reverse or to perform any of the other actions that games require during play. So, that meants that during your "strenuous" workout driving the car around, you would have to jump out of the workout abruptly to get the car back onto the road if you got turned around, then start back up again. I suppose if a game were built specifically for the device, then a continuous workout could be achieved, otherwise I thought it required too much switching between working out and playing the game. Having used this thing and DDR dance pads I can say with certainty that DDR integrates working out with fun gameplay FAR better than this device. If I may quote the horse from classic Ren and Stimpy, "No sir, I don't like it!"

  84. Completely Useless by Zakabog · · Score: 1

    This is completely useless. After doing the same excersize over and over it looses it's muscle developing affect because your body becomes used to doing the task and becomes more efficient at it (and becomes more prone to cheating, doing the excersize the wrong way that's much easier, like swinging an arm to lift a heavy weight).

    Maybe if their was some sort of all in one excersize machine controller, like a bowflex or something like that, that can connect to a PC or another game console. That would be a nice way to work out although without a mobile screen you wouldn't be able to see the games without straining yourself, maybe you can use some VR goggles. It'd probably cost a fortune but it'd be a nice excersize machine for geeks (unless they use it too much and damage their muscles.)

    Ok you know what forget it, just go to a gym and get a trainer, it'll be much better than working out yourself and much more effective. You won't damage your body and you won't have the same excersize over and over again doing nothing for your muscle development.

  85. Must Move! by DumbSwede · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Call me a snob, but I work out often, and I don't believe this isometric system will do much for overall health.

    I do three types of exercise:
    Free Weights
    Machine (Nautilus)
    Aerobic

    Now I'm not saying isometric is bad for you, just that I've never seen anyone build muscle with or or get good cardio vascular from it. It can provide toning when used in conjunction with other exercise types.

    I personally think people will be bored with isometric exercise, because you don't feel any movement (granted here you have game feedback). But motion is what really gets you the next immersion level. I used to do computerized rowing machine, and I really enjoyed chasing my computer opponent in the other boat.

    Isometric won't condition you for real athletic performance in the real world. The same reason I use a mix of machine and free weights. The free weights train your body for how to lift against real mass in the real world, and though you may not realize it, you will be be adapted to say helping your significant other move the couch around the room a dozen times until its "Fung Shui"

    I suppose its possible to get the heart rate up for cardio with isometric, but it seems unlikely for most. Again, motion is the key to health. Get moving until you work up a moderate sweat and maintain for anywhere from 15 minutes to an hour to really get cardio benefits.

    I like the idea of linking computer games and workouts, I have a friend that is hooked on Dance-Dance-Revolution and it works well for him. I just don't think this cheap-o scheme of isometric will catch on, or more importantly really give the advertised benefits.

  86. that is nothing compared to other gamepads: by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    these have been around for a while...

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  87. Chick magnet? by FVK · · Score: 1


    "My, what well developed forearms you have..."

    ...Dude pats game controller...

    "Yup, been pumping iron all day, baby"

  88. Why is it all or none? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all the whiney bastards going on and on about 'just put the joystick down, go outside, exercise, eat less' well, no kidding. But why not add a bit more activity in your life on TOP of that? Is that such a horrible thing?

    Every little bit helps. A half hour walk, one less can of soda a day, walking up a flight of stairs, what's wrong with adding this into the mix?

    Are those that read Slashdot only capable of seeing things in black and white? How do they function in the real world, having to deal with normal people?

  89. BULLSHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The US government doesn't care about obecity, and it is apparent to anyone who pays attention. Recently on C-SPAN there were lots of experts discussing it intelligently, while the FDA was absent. Actually, they sent someone there to share "his own" opinions, which translate to "obecity is a result of progress, therefore good". At one point he actually said something like "my argument sounds right because it is" and everybody laughed (including me) because it seemed like he was joking. He wasn't. The FDA represents lots of people with deep pockets, making tons of money off food that is little more than flavored wheat starch and sugar. They will continue to do so as long as possible.

    1. Re:BULLSHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      food that is little more than flavored wheat starch and sugar

      And there is the problem right there. People who eat nutritionally empty foods can't be healthy no matter how much they excersise. You can be thin, but if you aren't getting the nutrition your body needs, you ain't gonna be healthy. It is that simple. Keep in mind that junkfood is not only nutritionally empty, it tends to be eaten in the place of healthy food - a double whammy. No, a multivitamin won't make it all better either. It will stave off the worst of the nutritional deficiency diseases, but real nutrition and health comes from whole foods. Eat your veggies, kids!

    2. Re:BULLSHIT by 3terrabyte · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yep, the American Heart Association (AHA) has their stamp of approval on every Sugar-Flakes cereal in the aisle!! How can you trust anything from them?

      Just because you fortify it, doesn't mean it's healthy!

      The main problem with today's health is the myth that "fat is bad". So they make all this fat-free foods that people gobble up. Their blood sugar spikes from all the carbs and they're hungry again too soon.

      Enriched flour is a terrible misnomer. It means that for the food companies to save money, they've taken wheat, ground it down to a powder, losing all the vitamins. Then fortify it with vitamins, and make cereal, bread, cakes, cookies, and pastas. The bad thing is, it's only 1 step above sugar.

      Complex Carbohydrates, protein, and fat all satiate your hunger for much longer than sugar and simple carbs.

      I'm no Atkins fan, but I did learn a lot from it. I only cut out simple carbs and counted calories when I lost my 150 pounds.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    3. Re:BULLSHIT by Disco+Stu · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on losing 150 pounds; that's really impressive.

  90. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by ender-iii · · Score: 1

    Wow, rafters? Is that thinking outside the box? Or missing the box altogether? I just jumped off the pad.

    --
    ender-iii
  91. my homemade kilowatt controller by kertong · · Score: 1

    I took my x-box controller and tied a 15lbs barbell to it. Now I'm fit and healthy, thanks to my healthy 8 hour/day dosage of xbox gaming. Who needs a kilowatt controller?

  92. York has a new fitness game for geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...called 'Gravity Warrior.' Instead of a joystick, it uses a metallic bar as the gaming device. You load a series of 'mass regulators' onto each end of the game controller. It creates a very dramatic simulation of gravity that is much more realistic than some force feedback joystick. I've played Gravity Warrior until my arms could no longer move! Its most safely played with two players. The post-game ritual includes a series of high-fives and mutual butt slapping irregardless of who actually won the game as show of good sportsmanship. Gravity Warrior gamers greet each other with the secret code words 'whatcha bench?' in sign of community brotherhood.

    1. Re:York has a new fitness game for geeks... by SamSim · · Score: 1

      Have you heard about this new thing called the GameSphere? Wireless as standard, up to 22 players teamplay, exercises the whole body...

  93. I get Plenty of Exercise While Gaming by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    Aerobic even! All of the numerous trips to the fridge to get a beer, while playing Madden, geez that's like a couple of miles at least.

    mmmm beer

    Can't figure out why I'm not losing any pounds though

  94. Popeye!! by pantycrickets · · Score: 1

    Gamers are all going to look like Popeye!

  95. To work the legs and heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    To work the legs and heart, the player could play DDR, as many others in this thread have pointed out.

  96. No patents! by LilMikey · · Score: 1

    Prior art: Dance Dance Revolution

    --
    LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  97. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by dmatlock · · Score: 1

    Flop, maybe, but have you ever played Outdoor Games on it? That was a complete workout. In fact I got my old power pad out a couple of years ago, and I wasn't able to even finish the game. Then again, I am not in the same shape I was when I was younger.

  98. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by Beek · · Score: 1

    I always just jumped off the pad, used my hands to land. Despite all the cheating, I gotta say that the powerpad was quite gully.

  99. isn't there already a solution? by madbeaner · · Score: 1

    i thought masturbation was the weapon of choice for the athletically minded gamer.

  100. I want Prop Cycle! by kisrael · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Prop Cycle was a cool looking game that had a built in exercise bike...you're onscreen character was a flying bicycle glider thingy and you had to burst balloons. I was always surprised there wasn't a home console game that had hardware to connect to an exercise bike, seems like a decently written game could be pretty engaging, like Pilot Wings on the N64... ...better for people than the Donkey Konga hardware...

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    1. Re:I want Prop Cycle! by kvigor · · Score: 1

      You mean like Cateye's GameBike?

    2. Re:I want Prop Cycle! by teneighty · · Score: 1

      I played Prop Cycle once - the gameplay was pretty reasonable. The main problem was that the peddling required very little effort and there was no real sense of actually pedalling the aircraft. Something like Prop Cycle, but with more effort feeback to make it really feel like you're cycling with out be pretty neat.

      I've always thought it would be really cool to have a game like that the involved trying to outrun bad things all the while, frantically flying through canyons, under bridges, between buildings, etc in a panicked attempt to escape.

    3. Re:I want Prop Cycle! by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Something like that...but w/ a custom game that didn't make pedaling a substitute for a gas "button"...since in most racers you keep the button mashed, it seems like an unfair disadvantage...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  101. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dang. Screw that - $700 is two years at Gold's Gym.

  102. Where is the home version of prop cycle? by jalbro · · Score: 1


    Dagnabbit!

    This looks dumb, and a good way to hurt your back.

    I want a home version of prop cycle!

    -Jeff

  103. How do you store it. by Kaishaku255 · · Score: 1

    Eventually, one has to put the game controller down to move on with life (hey what's this in my hand?).

    And where are the other three going to go for multiplayer games?

    --

    Seppuku: Your solution to my problems!

  104. In Other News by TCaptain · · Score: 1

    ...600 geeks with too much money drop dead of heart attacks over the weekend. Film at 11.

    --
    "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
  105. Idiocy by d3m057h3n35 · · Score: 1

    "We take the guilt out of gaming and put the fun back into exercise"

    This makes no sense! A gamer suffers guilt from not gaming, and exercise will never be fun, or we wouldn't call it exercise. $700...what nonsense. Noone would use this unless they were paid to.

    Quite the genius came up with this concept, eh?

  106. Using the whole controller to steer... by OriginalSpaceMan · · Score: 1

    What about those of us that understand that not moving your entire body or controller when steering or jumping, speeding up or slowing down creates the same result in the game? I just sit, press buttons, and watch the screen. This would then cost me hundreds of dollars to just stand and press buttons...

    --

    You talk better than you fool!
  107. What about cardio? by Chibi · · Score: 1

    If the controller actually works, then this could help some people be in better physical condition than they currently are, but we really shouldn't ignore cardiovascular fitness. In some ways, this could be a bad thing, because people will think they are in better physical condition than they really are (which is already a problem). Everyone should unplug for a while and go outdoors. You'll live a longer and higher-quality life (for the most part).

    --
    If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
  108. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by kiwimate · · Score: 1

    This product will almost certainly flop, because it doesn't have any games designed for it, so there almost certaintly won't be any games that are more fun using it.

    Does that matter? As far as I can tell from the article, it's a replacement for the corresponding features on your controller. So I'd assume it acts like a standard PS2 (or whatever) controller, just bigger and funnier looking, and as such doesn't need specially designed games.

  109. Who Would buy it? by Zevets · · Score: 1
    I think is a stupid gimmick. The racing wheel they described would be notoriously expensive at $700. For $150 I can get myself a nice (real) leather covered steering wheel, from a German(Italian?) luxury car maker, the Logitech Momo Steering Wheel. Fitness is great, but $700 when I can have an uberwheel for $150? Even if it runs higher, which it may, it is definitely cheaper than $700. (A real steering wheel costs $225 from them)

    My next point is gameplay. From the prolouge edition, GT4 is supposed to be extremely hard. It will be difficult to floor the accelerator, at the perfect time coming out of the turn. If I am going to be straining to accelerate, then I will lose the race, get frustrated with the game and stop. If its not fun and I will not play and I will not exercise.

    If you are obese, and need something to lose weight, then maybe. But there are better cheaper alternatives. Second of all, it will butcher the gameplay. The whole point of videogames is fun. I doubt that this will make video games more fun. If it does though, then it may be worth it's hefty $700 price.

    --

    Mod Wisely.

  110. Not for legs, dummy! by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Its called a dance dance revolution pad, and those have been around for years.

    It's for hand control, so you could, after a few years of playing games, have arms like Popeye and legs like Olive Oyl.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  111. Good Idea by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

    People will probably make fun of this device, but I'd consider buying one.

    Hopefully a second generation model would address some of it's limitations. As far as I can tell this machine must only work one or two muscle groups in the arm (maybe some in the shoulder). That may be neat, but it's never going to be able to replace a real workout. Also the price was a bit steep.

    If this machine worked out most of your body, and cost less than $300, I'd definitely purchase one, between $300-$500 I'd consider it.

    --
    Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  112. Is it really $700? by The+I+Shing · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh, man, for $700 you can go to a place like Sears and get a nice little corner workout center, or, even better, you can join a friggin' gym.

    Your whole body needs a whole-body workout. Working out your upper arms and your wrists just exercises your upper arms and your wrists. Don't count on that to reduce your pants size anytime soon.

    If this idea is going to succeed, what they need to do is build the videogame into the exercise machine, not the other way around.

    I'm picturing it... like a wall-sized screen that has orcs coming at you and you have to defeat them by lifting a 120-lb weight in three 12-rep sets. After the first wave is complete, you have to win a Nascar race by running on a treadmill for twenty minutes, followed by destroying the One Ring by enduring two gruelling sets of inverted crunches.

    The gym that installs that system will have a loyal membership of fit and healthy nerds as its reward.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  113. Oh yea? by tacokill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Puffing? I get plenty of that already. That's the reason I smoke when I play video games...

    1. Re:Oh yea? by tepples · · Score: 1

      If you want to get in shape, you're supposed to play StepMania, not Tetanus On Drugs.

  114. Why buy? by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just go into the local bar and insult the biggest guy in there.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:Why buy? by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Because I want exercise, not a trip to the hospital. Besides, the medical care probably costs just as much.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    2. Re:Why buy? by Alpha_Geek · · Score: 1

      To first big biker: Aren't you Richard Simmons?

      To second big biker: Aren't you Richard Simmons' best friend.... Richard Simmons?

    3. Re:Why buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just go into the local bar and insult the biggest guy in there.

      I'm only 19, you insensitive clod!

  115. oh look, another idiot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who can't see doublespeak for what it is. I bet you think we need more research on global warming before we do anything about it.

    1. Re:oh look, another idiot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Considering how fucking cold it is here, I would say a little research is a good idea.

      I find it funny that just because some scientists say that there is this global warming going on, all the sheep believe them. "They are scientists, scientists are smart, they must be right." Scientists don't know shit, in the grand scheme of things. They watch, guess, watch some more, guess again, repeat as neccessary.

      You just keep believing what they tell you, leave the thinking to those of us that are qualified to do so.

    2. Re:oh look, another idiot ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You just keep believing what they tell you, leave the thinking to those of us that are qualified to do so.

      So who might you be? What makes you so qualified?

  116. Why? by aliens · · Score: 1

    We all know gamers have the strongest wrists in the world....

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  117. The reason this will flop by Dracolytch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DDR, the boxing game at some arcades (name escapes me), and a couple others have shown that it is possible to have a commercial success when blending games with exercise.

    But this thing is still gonna flop. Why? Very simply... It gets in the way of the game.

    Unlike DDR, or the boxing game, the controller hinders the users' ability to play the game effectively. The controller gets in the way of the game, instead of enhancing it. It is for this reason that people will ditch it... Not because it's a bad idea, but because it's a bad gaming device.

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  118. Muscular hands? by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
    How lame. I figure if I don't break a sweat, I'm not really gaining from a physical activity. DDR MAX gets a decent aerobic workout, but imagine the conversation:

    Wow, you've go some muscular hands.
    Yea, I developed them by playing with my stiff joystick...

  119. "Ex" -- "Err" -- "Sighs"? by Atario · · Score: 1

    Wha?

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  120. This is not a good idea by brundlefly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Practically speaking, repetitively working a muscle is NOT the same thing as exercise. Not only is this "exercise" anaerobic, but it also opens up a huge potential for injuries resulting from RSI. Imagine a mouse with a button which required a 1/2-pound of force to click instead of 1/20-ounce. Or a keyboard with such 1/2-pound buttons. We would all be crippled by now if we had been using these instead of our current devices.

  121. lemme tell ya by *weasel · · Score: 1

    this is simply someone trying to get some of the ridiculous quantities of money people spend on exercise equipment out of gamers.

    seriously, people spend -thousands- on a Bowflex thinking they'll use it - and then they collect dust.

    this company is simply trying to make $700 a shot off well-intentioned gamers and concerned parents who believe that the only thing preventing a change in lifestyle is the availability of exercise equipment.

    That's why it sounds like a commercial for the Ab Abber 2000. Because it is. It doesn't have to make sense - it doesn't have to be practical. It just has to look like it can help you live better without intruding into your life style that much.

    It's clever marketing, not science.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
  122. Feedback at max "throttle"? by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    My question is, how will you know if you're pushing hard enough to equal full forward on a joystick? The only way I can think of to know for sure would be some sort of on-screen display... which would be distracting at the very least. Not to mention that it doesn't appear they've addressed this issue at all.

  123. Fit'n'Frag'n by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    Now if this can be hooked up to Quake or Doom3 coming out I'd be all for this!

    Great excersize, great frag'n, and best of all I'd impress the ladies with a great shape. Imagine the look on her face when she asks you how much you pump to keep that form and you answer "With my railgun or rocket launcher?"

    You know each weapon would be a different workout.Railguns are light excersize (Camping) while rocket launchers are heavy excersize (Running and rocket jumping).

    To bad reality isn't like that, ahh well. :)

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  124. Can you say. . . by jafac · · Score: 1

    RSI?
    I knew you could. . .

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  125. Affordability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen similar stuff at arcades, but if they really want people to use it and/or if they want any widespread effect from people using it, they need to make it affordable!

  126. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

    # Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
    # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
    # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

  127. It's all about alleviating guilt by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

    "We take the guilt out of gaming and put the fun back into exercise," said company spokesman Chuck Martinez.

    AntiOrganic asks "Why all the gimmickry?" I think the above quote from the article answers that nicely. No one who has given more than a few moments thought to this would ever dream of suggesting that pushing hard on a joystick is some form of exercise. But if you are looking for an excuse to do something you enjoy doing, it's fairly easy to say "Well, I'm going to play videogames anyhow so might as well play one that it kinda good for me." Of course, the amount that this is "good for you" is so insignficant that it doesn't mean anything but that's thinking rationally about it.

    So much of what goes on these days is simply marketing trying to help us alleviate our guilt about what we choose to do. There are fat-free cookies and fat-free potato chips. Subway is advertising some new wrap sandwhich that is chock full of bacon and ranch dressing with the name "Atkins' friendly" plastered all over it as if to suggest that a sandwhich filled with hydrogenated and saturated fats is some kind of health food. Hell, even KFC was recently advertising their extra-super-deep-fried chicken as healthy until public outcry finally got too much.

    One of my big pet peeves is when people think they are accomplishing something when in fact they are not. Some of the blame has to go to the marketers who try ever so desperately to claim any kind of benefit to using or consuming their products. But a lot of the blame has to go towards the buying public who are so desperate to alleviate their guilt for not doing "what they're supposed to be doing" that they are willing to eat up this blatantly bullshit advertising. Like Yoda says: do or do not do. Don't try to fool yourself by pretending that some joystick is going to solve your athletic or health goals.

    GMD

    1. Re:It's all about alleviating guilt by calethix · · Score: 1

      You forgot about the all new 'low carb' thickburger from Hardee's. Mmm, nothing healthier than a big greasy cheese burger.

      That one made me laugh even more than KFC's 'healthy chicken'

    2. Re:It's all about alleviating guilt by swat_r2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sounds funny until you realize Atkins actually works. Don't knock it till' you've tried it.

    3. Re:It's all about alleviating guilt by stuph · · Score: 1

      it makes you lose weight.. perhaps it's true.. it's a healthy diet to maintain for the rest of your life (which you have to do, unless you want to gain that weight back plus more).. it's not.. not healthy at all..

      --
      --Less Thinkin', More Drinkin'...
    4. Re:It's all about alleviating guilt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you read the Journal of the American Medical Association, you might recall that a number of recent studies published there have had a slew of positive results. Including: more improvement in triglycerides, cholesterol and other symptoms associated with heart disease than low fat diets; Better weight loss; better weight loss with significantly more calories per day (either 300 or 500, I forget) than the low fat control group.

      Also, there is a misperception that after being on Atkins you will gain back weight faster than losing weight some other way. This is probably due to the fact that going from a strict low carb regimen (e.g. Atkins induction level) to uncontrolled eating there is a quick weight gain of several pounds of water when the body starts to store normal levels of glycogen and the associated water.

      Finally, if you're doing Atkins properly, you're eating plenty of green vegetables and adding more carbs back to your diet as you go through the phases. Plus, there is no general requirement to eat lots of high fat foods on Atkins.

    5. Re:It's all about alleviating guilt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anorexia makes you lose weight too but it's not healthy.

  128. Wrong. by Aniquel · · Score: 1

    I can tell you from personal experience that isometric exercises are some of the most strenuous that you can do.
    Don't believe me? Try an easy one: Tense your thigh muscles as much as you can for 2 minutes. Here's a harder one: Start to do a push-up, but stop halfway down. And hold it for 2 minutes.

    1. Re:Wrong. by calethix · · Score: 1

      What's that have to do with cardiovascular fitness? Just because your arms get tired doesn't mean your heart gets any more of a work out.
      I think the parent's point was that while this may make your arms stronger, it's not going to have much impact on your health. Probably won't burn up a whole lot of calories either if the goal is to lose weight.

    2. Re:Wrong. by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Back in highschool we found that some of best lifts for cranking your max were incremental lifts, stop 10 times up and down, you could only do about 1/2 as many reps as you would normally do with that weight. You'd only want to do this on your last rep. Incidentally Fran Dresser (the Nanny gal) claims that her secret to looking good (say what you will about her voice, she has a nice bod) is isometric excercises anytime she sits.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  129. This is a step from the wrong direction. by Hoplite3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bah, home fitness videogame gizmos indeed. What they REALLY need is to hook up the old Paperboy game to a stationary bike. You'd have a screen to see a first-person view of the neighborhood, a "mirror" region to see the dogs chasing you, and a button to throw papers. You could have fun while riding the damned bike. How hard is that?

    I'm serious. They already as gizmos about calories burned, heart rate, miles traveled, and other crap to these bikes for infotainment. Why not take the next step? Hell, you could make people pay for rides with quarters and turn every fitness club in the country into an arcade.

    --
    Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
    1. Re:This is a step from the wrong direction. by mschoyen · · Score: 1

      I notice this got modded as Funny, but I'd dig this kind of thing too. You could do it with a simple flight simulator too, like that flying bicycle action mentioned earlier.

      I have this great image of a guy in workout clothes going to the arcade, throwing a towel over the seat and plunking in quarters while he sweats away between SanFrancisco Rush and Area 51.

      At the very least it'd make a pretty amusing commercial.

  130. don't gamer's already have that motion down? by dh003i · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean, don't most people who sit around and game all day basically have the motions dealing with lower arm strength all pat and down? After so many repetitive...strokes...they must have pretty strong brachioradials.

  131. Shouldn't it be: by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    "In a racing game like Gran Turismo, the harder you push on the joystick, the faster the semi-delicate irreplacable touch sensors wear out, while pulling back slows down joystick wear."

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  132. Even older... by phorm · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's called pr0n. It's been around for a very long time, and geeks have been exercising their arms with it since near the beginning. Modern versions included usage of such tools as "edonkey" or "newgroups"

  133. Medical conditions are not the norm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "stop eating when you're not hungry, not when you're full."

    a very un-insightful statement there.

    many people that are overweight do stop eating when they are not hungry. their insulin-intolerance causes a insulin spike to last too long making them hungry too long.

    Maybe if you knew much about the human diet and medical conditions that are common to cause obesiety you would have not made such a stupid remark.

    Lumpy, while it is true that the parent's post is a bit simplistic you are erring on the other extreme. While there certain medical conditions that cause people difficulty in losing weight, to insinuate that this means AntiOrganic's advice of "everything in moderation" is a 'stupid remark' is just not right. We all know what we have to do to eat healthy and lose weight. Eat less saturated fat. Eat more vegetables. Get some regular exercise. Don't eat so fuckin' much. Really, this is sound advice and it's something we all know. You can probably find people who have certain medical conditions that cause them to have more difficulty than the 'average' person in losing weight. But that doesn't mean that reducing caloric intake wouldn't help these people tremendously.

  134. Mod parent down by Durindana · · Score: 0

    Same stupid claim as the DDR guy above without the funny admission part - the PowerPad was a Twister-pad looking thing, this is a torsion bar for upper-body tension.

    CTFL (click the fucking link), mods.

  135. Yeah by savagedome · · Score: 1

    Exactly what I wanted. More excercise for my right hand. Hooray!

  136. Who needs this product? by starvingcodeartist · · Score: 1

    Gamers already have at least one strong arm! Thanx p0rn!

  137. Making it interesting by phorm · · Score: 1

    Well, if many other geeks are like me, it's not that I don't exercise ever, just not often as I'd like. Why? Because it's not interesting or stimulating. Weights go up, weights go down. Push-up, go-down. It's boring and not in any way stimulating.

    In the summer, there's a lot more to do outdoors. Roller blading, biking, swimming etc are all good forms of exercise that can be relaxing and stimulating.

    Walks work at most times of the year but I find are more interesting if done with somebody else (so you have somebody to talk to).

    All the above work even better with music (except group walks).

    One of the main problems in this season (N. America climate) is that there's not as much to do in winter on a budget. I would absolutely love to go skiing all weekend, but a season's pass is like $300-400.

    Making exercise into a game is not just about making it cute, it's about making it interesting.

  138. What, what, whaaaat? by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

    An articles about a joystick, which promotes exercising various muscles, and does NOT involve pr0n??? Somebody dropped the ball somewhere here...

  139. vim interface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see something like this for vim. Mode change would require a squat, moving around would require a combination of arm movements and running on the spot. Of course there would still be a keyboard for inputing text in edit mode, but command mode would represent a real workout.

  140. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    I got the powerpad one Christmas before the Summer Olympics, it was pretty fun to step up to the fast dots and try to beat the gold medalist's time or distance.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  141. Good point by tyroney · · Score: 1

    And people used to think "nintendo thumb" was bad...

  142. What would your mom do with this? by demo9orgon · · Score: 1

    A game controller is not supposed to fight you. It's supposed to extend your skills into a game/sim environment. Force-feedback is useful and allows the environment to affect your efficiency, and controllers that "rumble" aren't too bad either, but when they market this kind of controller as a replacement for general purpose controllers I feel like spitting and running up the black flag.

    What this controller needs to do is support a physical game, like dance-mats support DDR. If there's some kind of Arm-Wrestling game it would make sense, but when I'm flying down the slope with Kaori (SSXTricky) and the controller causes me problems I start channeling Nordic Stormgod rage. That controller dies to make room for the next one. Any gamer who values their time will not waste their time deluding themselves that a controller that exhausts them is a good idea. It's a recipie for frustration.

    I'm certain that if the people who came up with device surveyed DDR gamers they would find that less than 10% actually use the mats because by the time you've even made an attempt to memorize the moves for one simple song all you want to do is just sit down and do something less strenuous in less than twenty minutes. The less time you can effectively spend with a game, the less you want to play it. DDR and other "physically" challenging video games require a "Buddy" system, much like going out and jogging.

    Knowing our luck, some markettroid took a "pie-in-the-sky" number of purchased Playstation2/Xbox consoles and came up with a "$100(N * .1)= $PROFIT" battle cry which was further taken up by some venture capitalists and decided to spring for it. Who knows, maybe version 2 will have a grip-pressure sensor and be able model other stimulating friction-based activites...imagine what Vice-City (n) "Bad Girls Go Everywhere" could do with something like that, featuring Christy Trysty in situations featuring Arm-Wresting, the odd dominitrix job, and the occasional "under the table" money-maker manuver before applying a killer-grip and demanding the entire wallet while trying to put the grip on some king-pin figure who framed her because she wouldn't put out for him. Sell it as a bundle for a bundle, $$$$. It would be serious wicked to hear the wife/girlfriend say,
    "Yeah, I gave him one of these," makes an OK gesture," and lead him outside where I killed his petrified naked ass with a pipe-wrench," and with a devious grin says, "now it's your turn, gimme that!" ...and much shrieking ensued.

    --
    Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento
  143. I think they have the concept backwards by Trevin · · Score: 1

    For one thing, people who want to play games are not as interested in getting exercise. So if it's too expensive, they won't buy it in the first place; if it is too difficult or tiring to play, they will either lose interest or find ways to cheat the system.

    IMO, what is needed is a motivation for people who are exercising to keep with it -- in other words, integrate games into exercise equipment, not the other way around. Another poster already mentioned a cycle that had a simple game of chasing the pace setter. Years ago I also saw articles on exercise bikes with video displays that would take you through a virtual bike route. Someone should make a game or other type of feedback for weight machines where you could score points by the amount of weight and/or reps you could do. That sort of thing.

    1. Re:I think they have the concept backwards by EllF · · Score: 1
      For one thing, people who want to play games are not as interested in getting exercise.

      Mrr? Are the two demographics truly contradictory? I, and most of my "geek" friends, are serious video gamers and computer programmers, but a number of us are avid martial artists, hikers, LARPers, and runners, as well.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
  144. Testicontroller by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to build more muscle playing street fighter games with my balls.

  145. Seen the Seanbaby MTV special? by davidhan · · Score: 1

    They showed some girl who lost a bunch of weight after she started playing DDR. Not only that she found new friends, got a new boyfriend etc. People will exercise if they think its fun.

  146. Close... by wikthemighty · · Score: 1


    Try playing Mortal Kombat 2 with the Sega Activator

    which is a giant octagon that you stand in the middle of and stick your arms/legs out for various buttons/directions. (8 directions, two hights make for a 16 button controller)

    The instructional tape that came with this was very funny, showing the kid playing with the Activator kicking the ass of the kid with the regular controller...

    The only neat thing about it was that the games that supported it (couple of fighting games) would map "forward" for the character to "forward" for you as well, which was interesting, but still less efficient.

    --
    "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
  147. A stationary bike attachment. by Twillerror · · Score: 1

    I always felt that this would be super simple to pull off with a stationary bike attachment.

    If you have a bike you can go out and get an speedometer for it for almost nothing. Mind you a nice one will cost about 50 to 100 bucks or more depending on how fancy you want to be.

    The point is this works by simpling install a magnet on the wheel, and a sensor on the frame. Then you can sense the velocity.

    Now connect this to an Xbox controller and you got a work out. The controller would have to have a kind of min/max setting. Say you stop the bike completely, the game hits the pause, or start button. Once you hit a certain min range, basically just a few rpms a second you just stand there. the faster you go over this range the joystick is slowly pushed up on the controller, obviously not physically, but since the joystick is analog you could get good range.

    Obviously turning is still going to be a button, but a good stationary bike will burn calories, and I think has been proven to help loose weight in combination with a good diet.

    This was actually used in an arcade game, I forget the name. You where on a hang glider type of bike thing. The faster you pedalled the faster your propeller went. I'm really suprised that Bally's didn't pick up on this. The arcade wasn't successfull because no one wants to go to an arcade an sweat!!

    I'm a biker to, so I'd love to get my daily workout, and get some project gotham 2 in at the same time.

    et

  148. It'll do for gamers what Pr0n did for perverts by Cumstien · · Score: 1

    This will have a similar effect to that of the pr0n industry - geeks with asymmetrical musculature. That is, a bulging dominate hand and arm. The non-dominate arm will still be the emaciated or flabby geek arm.

    Man I wish I hadn't thought of that....

    1. Re:It'll do for gamers what Pr0n did for perverts by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      killer app prediction:
      an online multiplayer first person spoojer

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  149. Easier way to work out whilst playing games. by Second_Derivative · · Score: 1

    1) Chip/Fliplid your PS2
    2) Buy a copy of Dance Dance Revolution Extreme JP for PS2
    3) Buy a Cobalt Flux (rather expensive but worth it)
    4) Profit.

    DDR is great fun, exercise factor or not. Anyone who thinks this game is easy or for girls has prolly never seen someone playing some of the level 9 or 10 rated tracks. And believe me, ten minutes of treadmill at 10mph doesn't make me sweat half as much as 90 seconds of Max300 (On the highest difficulty setting, you've got to hit 555 steps in those 90 seconds. Work it out). The fact that this game is seriously bloody addictive despite all this is quite an achievement on Konami's part.

    Unfortunately I'm in halls so a home setup isn't really practical, instead I blow a lot of money on the arcade version. But yes I think it makes a bit more sense than wrestling with some strange joysticks...

  150. A PC version would be better... by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I don't see this working out for a gamer that wants to perform well. Obviously you can twitch your thumbs a lot faster than you can push whatever weighted system they have implemented.

    Now on the other hand... I've always been surprised that no one had implemented a stationary-bike kind of setup for a PC workstation (that I've seen anyways - feel free to add links). It wouldn't even been that hard; off the top of my head, you could hook the mouse wheel to a sensor on the bike wheel, so you had to pedal to scroll while browsing. Backwards and forwards. Imagine you'd burn a few calories that way...

    Anyways, the invention is a compelling idea, but they should have bundled specific games with it... a MechWarrior kind of thing would be neat...

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  151. Dr. Nanny, Ph.D? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Back in highschool we found that some of best lifts for cranking your max were incremental lifts, stop 10 times up and down, you could only do about 1/2 as many reps as you would normally do with that weight. You'd only want to do this on your last rep. Incidentally Fran Dresser (the Nanny gal) claims that her secret to looking good (say what you will about her voice, she has a nice bod) is isometric excercises anytime she sits.

    Thanks for letting us know Dr. Fran Dresser's latest research on the subject of physiology. This, coupled with the detailed studies you conducted in high school has given me the confidence to give up my doctor-approved workout regimine and adopt something that takes less time and effort.

    Buddy, I hate to tell you but celebs are not a wonderful source of fitness knowledge. Most of them are genetically very lucky and would look pretty damn good regardless of what they do.

  152. Brains over Brawn by addaon · · Score: 1

    A few pulleys and levers, some screws... yeah, I'd be good at these games.

    --

    I've had this sig for three days.
  153. Re:I BUILD MUSCLES BY MASTURBATING FURIOUSLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Masturbation ... What's that all about? Is it good, or is it Whack?

  154. Another method - no console required by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    1. Use PC.

    2. Get a flight sim.

    3. Get a Thrustmaster HOTAS Cougar joystick...

    4. ???

    5. Strong muscles!

    Seriously, the springs on said joystick are ridiculously hard. If any other gaming will build up muscles, this will! (Personally I can't stand to use one for more than 10 minutes)

  155. These games already exist by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 1

    There are already plenty of games out there that help you get exercise. Basketball, baseball, soccer ... no expensive electronics required, either!

    Cheers,
    IT

    --

    Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

  156. Re: Bad score by toyotaboy · · Score: 1

    Imagine the other kids mocking you because your gran turismo track times suck "haha! you only got around 3 laps in 10 minutes. We're all in shape so we use our controller, so we do it in 6 minutes!"

  157. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by pavon · · Score: 1

    I could see something like this selling for use in a niche of games - not because you get exercise, but because your strength determines if you win. Kind of like those big "ring the bell by hitting the mallet" games at carnival, or arm wrestling, or all the games in Mario Party that depend soley on hitting a button really fast.

  158. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  159. My idea of a good time by SlamboS · · Score: 1

    ...is having a LAN party/strength training session with all my friends.
    ...is having santa bring me an eliptical with a nintendo logo on it
    ...sweating while playing video games when my roommate's friends walk in
    I mean seriously this thing has some wide ranging implications... Especially the modified USB version to make porn a more active activity!

    --
    Today is the closing of a parenthesis opened before this sig, before this story, before this existence that is me (as if
  160. I thought the SNES controller had this... by kabocox · · Score: 1

    Back in the days of NES & SNES, I could eat anything and not worry about my weight. Then came the N64 controller and I suddenly started to gain weight. I switched to computer games and played games mostly with the keyboard and mouse. My weight has increased through college and since. I have a PS2 now. I'm not noticing the effects of the SNES controller where I'd keep the same weight. I don't think the vibration controllers have helped. I think the jumping around the room and yelling at the screen because the character didn't move when I pressed the button helped. I'm calmer now. I just lay down on the couch and play FFX2. Hell I just hold down the damn X button and beat just about all the enemies except for bosses.

    We need a return to classic gaming where we had to press that jump and shot button like 5 million times and jump around the room and off the couch alot. I think a sensor in the controller that wouldn't let your onscreen guy jum unless you did would work wonders. Jumping would help everything.

  161. two words by chazman00 · · Score: 1

    pipe dream

  162. It could be better than treadmills, too... by zipwow · · Score: 1

    You've got a great point here. Some of the things that treadmills with a heart monitor do is make sure that your heart rate stays in the correct range. Varying the terrain and chasing dogs could help you get to the correct heart rate. Paper throwing and navigation complexity could increase for each level, rather than physical difficulty.

    Prop-cycle was a pretty reasonable game, too.

    I'm all for it, sign me up!

    -Zipwow

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
  163. Re:This is not flamebait by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Come on. This isn't flamebait. From Cheney meeting secretly to determine national energy policy to Rumsfeld visiting Iraq to facilitate oil pipiline construction that's exactly what this administration is about. Even a Republican would heartily agree that the admnistration agenda is to promote the interests of the monied and the corporations and to eventually privatize everything. That's what supply side economics is all about (otherwise know as starving the beast).

    The above comment is merely an observation.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  164. If you want to build your muscles playing games... by suso · · Score: 1

    .. go play Epyx Summer Games for C64 with a Joystick.

  165. Muscle - fat? by zipwow · · Score: 1

    Does muscle really "turn into" fat? I know we all say that, but I don't think the cells really change from being muscle cells to fat cells. It seems that way, probably, because when you burn less calories (less muscle) but still eat the same, you gain fat (new cells).

    From that description, I don't see how losing muscle or stopping running is different...

    -Zipwow

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
  166. But with what controller? by tepples · · Score: 1

    There's an open-source clone of DDR called stepmania that also supports EZ2Dancer.

    I know. I play StepMania, partly because I can't afford a PS2, and Konami isn't releasing any more DDR games on PS1 or any on GameCube at all. Yes, there exist Para and EZ2 modules for StepMania, but what affordable USB or PSX controller should I use for them?

    1. Re:But with what controller? by Chaset · · Score: 1

      It may not necessarily be "affordable", but you can use any PS/PS2 controller with one of the many PS->USB converters on the market. The one I have, I believe, is called something like "Kiki Joy" (poing! poing!)

      --
      -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
    2. Re:But with what controller? by tepples · · Score: 1

      The Kiki adapter sucks. I use the EMS USB2 adapter. Now my original question: What PS/PS2 controller accepts arm position input for Para Para Paradise without costing $100 plus shipping?

  167. Sure... just what a gamer wants... by jorlando · · Score: 1

    when playing videogames you really want do phisical effort... that's why you play video games... the problem were the flimsy controls that couldn't stand... I can see the sales soaring...

  168. Redundant! by Laconian · · Score: 1

    Existing gamepads already build up my muscles. My THUMB muscles!

  169. NES powerpad by gotem · · Score: 1

    for those who still have a powerpad around, try this

  170. Muscle does not "turn into" fat by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

    That is the typical wisdom... more muscles, more weight loss. However, most people don't look at this solution for the long run.

    One thing that is helpful to note is that tuxette is a dedicated weight trainer (she's mentioned that she powerlifts in previous posts) so she is looking at it in the long run.

    More muscle also means more maintenance. If you can bench press 300, you'd better be at the gym 5 days a week to maintain that muscle. If you don't, you'll lose the muscle and it'll just turn into... fat.

    I didn't realize this myth was still around! Seriously, all you'd have to do is take 30 seconds to do a google search and you'd see this has been debunked a long time ago. Regarding your assertion that advanced bodybuilders need to go to the gym more often than novices, that is also false but for different reasons. Once you get to the point where you are benching 300, most of your "easy gaining" years are behind you. You need to be much more careful about maintaing a balance between actually lifting weights (which causes microscoping damage to the muscles) and rest (which will allow you body to rebuild the muscles so they are stronger than they were before). You need to spend less time in the gym as you get more advanced, not more. Of course, the time you spend in the gym has to be damn intense. But building muscle on a body that already thinks it has enough is more about quality of effort than quantity.

    All that having been said, if your motivation for lifting weights is solely to lose fat then you probably are wasting your time. You do have to work to maintain any muscle you build. Not because it will turn into fat but because your body will tear down the protein stores and burn that for energy. However, the effort you have to put into maintaining is not all that much and certainly doesn't require you to go to the gym 5 days a week. That's just crazy.

    GMD

    1. Re:Muscle does not "turn into" fat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is very accurate, someone please mod this up.

  171. Re:Nintendo had this in the 80's, it was a flop. by Ondo · · Score: 1

    Does that matter? As far as I can tell from the article, it's a replacement for the corresponding features on your controller. So I'd assume it acts like a standard PS2 (or whatever) controller, just bigger and funnier looking, and as such doesn't need specially designed games.

    It doesn't *need* them, it just doesn't have a chance of actually being fun without them, IMO.

    Dance Dance Revolution is designed around the exercise - you can't just add it to any old game and expect it to be as fun as it was with the controller it was designed for.

  172. huh by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

    So THATS the reason that my right arm is stronger than my left ;-)

    --

  173. this was cool the first time i saw it by sexninja · · Score: 0

    when it was called 'force feedback'

  174. whatever... by supabeast! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How do the guys who sell this junk even manage to get the product to market without dying from laughter as they bilk stupid investors out of millions of dollars? And why is it that investors still haven't caught on that specialty video game controllers without mainstream game support-lightgun games, ddr, steering wheels-don't make money?

    Funk dat!

    And people wonder why I refuse to invest in stocks...

    1. Re:whatever... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "And why is it that investors still haven't caught on that specialty video game controllers without mainstream game support-lightgun games, ddr, steering wheels-don't make money?"

      Because the weightloss industry is a billion dollar industry. And anything that offers the chance to lose weight while sitting on your fat ass playing video games has a good chance of selling in America. Remember, the vast majority of people aren't as intelligent about these things as your average slashdotter.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  175. Not told what to eat. by khasim · · Score: 1

    But people do respond to advertising. So why not limit the advertising of the stuff we know will make you fat and expand the advertising of stuff that is more healthy for you?

  176. How does this differ from going to the gym? by budGibson · · Score: 1

    So, most gym equipment is actually computerized, providing different courses for challenges, etc. How is this any different from going to the gym? If people are not going to the gym, why would they go here?

  177. For cardiovascular exercise... by metalion · · Score: 1
    Personally, the best exercise game peripheral I have seen (other than the DDR dance pad) is the Cateye Game Bike. It apparently works with most speed related games.

    Talk about some motivation to exercise (I have to win the race!). Plus with the variety of maps/tracks available, this seems like it would make exercise quite fun. Now only if I could get exercise like that when playing Quake...

  178. Re:I BUILD MUSCLES BY MASTURBATING FURIOUSLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    both actually

  179. SimCycle by Zardoz44 · · Score: 1
    You mean something like this.

    I definitely agree that having computer games and exercise equipment linked is the way to go. I would rather play a sport than work out at the gym. I'd rather play computer games than do pushups at home. They still have room for a lot of improvement, but it's a step in the right direction.

    Isometric exercise and/or cardio. Every little bit helps. And building muscle is a great way to reduce fat ( though not necessarily lose weight).

  180. Damn! I thought of this. by AlecC · · Score: 2, Funny

    I though of this years ago. Except I was going to take it at a lower level. And it was the bad old days of dial up with a 14.4K modem. Stop pedalling and your screen goes dark. Pedal gently to keep the screen alive. Pedal faster for net access - the faster you pedal, the greater your baud rate. Trouble is, I was frightened of a heart attack as you try to load pages from a slow site, not realising that it is their fault, not yours, that the download is slow. And the danger of downloading prOn is frighting ("just a bit fastaer and I'll see....").

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  181. Indeed by JMZero · · Score: 1

    Right now I'm building myself a game controller out of my exercise bike. It should yield a reasonable workout, will actually make for a playable game (turn with handlebars, pedal to go faster), and will certainly cost less that $700.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    1. Re:Indeed by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      You should play Paperboy with it on MAME!

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  182. Another right handed exercise.. by phelix_da_kat · · Score: 3, Funny
    "In a racing game like Gran Turismo, the harder you push on the joystick, the faster a car goes, while pulling back slows down the vehicle."

    Ok, you get a strong right hand, right arm, right everyting..

    There are other exercises you can do to achieve the same result :-D

    We should stick to Dance Revolution, at least the side effect is that you can pretend to have a fit.

  183. a better proposal by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 1

    You want good exercise while gaming? well, if merely lifting an x-box controller isn't enough for you, why not hook the tv and game system up to a treadmill, so that you generate the power you use (i would recommend a ups in case you have to use the bathroom before reaching a save point.)

    --
    Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
  184. The logo related to hacker emblem ... by stubaggs · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice this ?, whats up with the relationship between the powergrid logo and the hacker logo, conspiricy ?

  185. Here's a game for the upper body.... by Arcanix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Every other day lift pieces of metal (sometimes called weights) with your biceps, triceps, shoulders, neck, etc., keep increasing the number of repetitions until it becomes incredibly easy then increase the weights and do it again!

    Note that this game is my invention and I do charge a royalty to use it.

    1. Re:Here's a game for the upper body.... by tepples · · Score: 1

      <playing-along>
      Do you mean that your company makes video games involving gym-style resistance training controllers? Which platform? Which store?
      </playing-along>

  186. I have my concerns by amplt1337 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Uhh. The picture of the guy in the article doesn't encourage my hopes for this thing's prospects...

    ...Oh wait. I'm the only one who actually read the article.

    --
    Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  187. So... by khrustalicious · · Score: 1

    What muscles will my "Celebrity Strip Poker" enbiggen?

  188. Hand muscles already toned by other 'fun' exercise by SA3Steve · · Score: 1

    I think we already have (daily?) exercises that build up the ever-important wrist muscles...and gamers are already performing this exercise at a very high frequency!

    I'm talking about typing of course! What were you thinking?

  189. Don't grumble -- adapt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can walk 1+ hour twice a day, everyday (up and down hills), eat less then 2000 cals (none of it junk food), and I will still gain weight.

    Losing weight is not about absolute measures of what you do, it's about relative ones. You need to do MORE than what you're doing now -- it doesn't matter how much you are ALREADY doing. It sounds like your metabolism (or something else) is really fucked up. Okay, then deal with it. You'll have to do MORE than walk 1+ hour a day. Eat LESS than 2000 calories. Who gives a crap if this is way, way more than most people have to do? It sucks to be you. Just deal with it! This approach WILL work because in the limit of tons of exercise and almost no food, you'll be emaciated.

    If you are like me, see a doctor and be ready to do some real work (diet, exercise, pills, and more).

    Well, you already claimed that diet and exercise don't work for you. So what is this 'work' of which you speak? Pills? 'And more'?

    If eat less, exercise more works for you, be happy because it doesn't work for everyone.

    It DOES work for everyone. You just haven't gone far enough yet for your particular situation.

  190. You know whats ironic? by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 1

    Whats ironic is that the makers of this "so called controller" never bothered to make one for the Gamecube. Ah well no big loss, it'll just end up in the heap like all the other 50 billion fitness gimmicks over the last few decades that are designed, not to work, but to steal your money.

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
    1. Re:You know whats ironic? by sharph · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. I don't get the irony.

      My guess is that PS2 and xbox are just thought of as the more popular systems, and I'm not saying thats good, and I'm not saying its bad, but the general idea is that GC is a "kid frendly, non killographic" system. Which is partly true.

  191. Hmmph! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kids these days.

    Back when I was a kid, if we wanted to build up our arms, we jacked off - AND WE LIKED IT!

  192. as any true gamer would attest by mushroom+blue · · Score: 1

    playing videogames for extended periods of time certainly builds muscle.

    why, after my first 10 hour marathon of Street Fighter II on the SNES, I found that the little muscle between my index finger and thumb on my left hand was weak and unable to move well. three days later (and a few more marathons), the damn thing was rock hard.

    also, playing games like Tekken Tag Tournament (especially when playing someone like King, Nina, or Armor King) will build up the muscles in your right forearm, from all the repetitions of complex button presses. after a good 2 hour stint of "king of the hill" on a Tekken Tag arcade machine, one's forearms will be screaming for mercy.

    oh, they meant cardiovascular fitness? pfft. who needs to jog for miles when I can crush concrete with my bare hands. :)

  193. Ergonomics? by shpoffo · · Score: 1

    This seems like it could spur a whole new surge of Repetitives Stress Injuries. My hands used to hurt enough just from using a regular control pad.....

    -shpoffo

  194. Okay by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    Don't know who the AC was, but i can't resist a challenge: Sony PS2: $180 Copy of Gran Turismo 4: $50 Kilowatt gaming system: $695 Having an excuse for your overdeveloped forearm muscles other than pr0n: pricless

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  195. Sounds Like... by jfmiller · · Score: 1

    There was an arcade game at on point where you flew a stationary bike through varoius landscapes. I've often thought that ifI had one of those on my home pc, I might be in much better shape, esp. if the attached game could hold my attention.

    JFMILLER

    --
    Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
  196. DDR by tepples · · Score: 1

    Jumping would help everything.

    Go to an arcade, drop some tokens into Konami's Dance Dance Revolution Extreme, choose heavy mode, and pick any of the songs "Dynamite Rave", "Drop Out", or "Maxx Unlimited", all of which feature rapid-fire jumps (a "jump" in DDR involves pressing two arrows at once). Then see if you still want a jumping game.

  197. I See One Major Problem by miyako · · Score: 1

    The article states that the controller will be compatible with XBox, PS2 and GCN. I'm assuming the way this works is that they include a controller>ps2 cable, a controller>xbox cable and a controller>gcn cable, so that one merely has to connect the correct cable. The major problem I see with this is extended support for newer consoles. While I do not personally own any home exersice equipment, I know people that do, and from that, I do know that the usefull life of exercise equipment is generally much longer than the life of a typical console.
    So what happens to all the people who buy this, then can't get appropriate connectors for the PS3, or XBOX2 or the Nintendo Game SuperQuadratic Ellipsoid or something. I know I would be upset to spend $700 on this thing, then not have it be supported in 3 years when the new consoles come out.
    Another problem I see is that if they do indeed use the same unit with different connectors (which would seem the most logical way of doing it by far), the consoles each have rather unique control schemes, and a common button interface may not adapt well to any of them trying to support all of them.
    That said, I could see the unit popular amongst XBox Players, as the unit as described seems to be quite a bit smaller than the standard xbox controller, and only slightly larger than the new smaller controller </really old humor>

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  198. not new... by mantera · · Score: 1

    reebok cyberrider has been on sale for over a year now http://www.reebokfitness.co.uk/upload/Products/Ful lsize/cyberriderlarge.jpg

  199. 2 Stationary Bike games and more... by realdddave · · Score: 1

    I know of at least two more exercise bike/entertainment combinations, but sadly I don't know any product names:

    The first is a combination that I recall seeing at EPCOT at Walt Disney World in Florida several years ago. The user picks a city and a video of a "ride-thru" of the city is shown on a TV monitor. The speed of the rider's pedaling determines the speed of the video. It was fun to try and match the speed as perfectly as possible to the speed the video was shot at...but it was also fun to pedal as fast as possible just to see things fly by. I believe you sat in a reclined seat, more like the bicycles built for speed records

    The other is more exciting. I also saw it at EPCOT on the same trip, but I've also seen it featured in Nintendo Power magazine. The unit was a fairly normal exercise bike with a TV and Super Nintendo in front of it and one half of a Super Nintendo controller on each handlebar. The only game that I know of that really took advantage of the set up was a bicycle racing game in which your pedaling determined the speed of your character in the bicycle race. The game itself was seen on the TV from behind your racer, and when other racers were next to you, you could hit a button on the controller to reach out and push/grab them. The digital pad was used to steer.

    The last one especially was always an exciting idea to me, and it's a shame the idea didn't truly take off. I'd love to have something like that now with 5~ different games I could play for 30 minutes once a week each.

    As a side note, I've also been interested in the Pocket Pikachu, Nintendo's Pokemon-themed digital pet. Not only was it IMO one of the superior digital pets, not only did it link via infrared to a Game Boy Color running Pokemon Yellow, it also included a pedometer that I'm sure encouraged a lot of people to take the long way to and from where they were going.

  200. Bad logic... by xintegerx · · Score: 1

    Thin doesn't imply healthy. When we discuss people with no muscles who weigh 300 pounds, we are talking about fat and that is unhealthy. On the same hand, a thin person with no muscle and a poor diet, but little fat, is still unhealthy. Fat people don't understand that their problem isn't that they're fat, it's that they're eating unhealthy foods and making themselves unhealthy. The solution isn't to "become thin", it's to become healthy, which for some body types might mean having a bit of love handles and stuff like that, but still regular work outs and avoiding sugar and carb fluffs (which are also the SOLE REASON for tooth decay and cavities, and the reason why they don't satisfy the body.)

    Basically, you'll have to end up not listening to a bird on TV telling you to eat a colorful cereal just because they fortified vitamins into the nothingness that it is. Marketing and Business is the study of lying to trick people into using stuff they don't need. Here are the only things your body needs, for those who are brainwashed and completely forgot:

    1) Water. Water water water. NOT LIQUIDS. NOT FLUIDS. I'm talking about water!

    2) Food. Not sugar, not carbs. Do you guys even know that sugar and carbs are just cheap placebos that don't do anything positive for the body, just triggering an insulin spike to eat more of them? Except they're worse than placebos because they actually hurt you. Sugar is the reason we have cavities, we did not have cavities until coca cola and other sugary foods entered mainstream. Why did they enter the mainstream? TO MAKE THOSE PEOPLE MONEY. And the companies still lie and market that shit as healthy when none of it is. Eat manly stuff like red meat, all sorts of meat, half of your diet meat! That will fill you up. The carbs should be stuff like vegetables and fruits (and their sugars are good because they fibers of the fruits wipe the sugar off the teeth!), etc. Basically, you do need to eat carbs, but THE MAIN THING THAT SHOULD BE THE DIET IS MEAT. Unlike this crap that the FDA says, that it should be 11 servings of bread. LOL. The diet should be meat and fruits and some milk. Eat cereal once in a while (Cheerios, Special K, Korn Flakes) of course. The whole point is to switch from eating cheap dime a dozen carbs to meat. WHY DO YOU THINK SUBWAY HAS SO MUCH BREAD AND SO LITTLE MEAT? Do you think it is because they want to follow the FDA guidelines? It's because THE LITTLE MEAT YOU GET IS is expensive compared to the TONS of bread that's worthless. That just makes you feel like not hungry for 10 seconds. You do need carbs with meat, but not as much as we are used to seeing. They should give half the bread and 3 times as much meat. Except this would cost like 3 times more!!! Why? BECAUSE MEAT IS WORTH MORE AND BREAD IS WORTHLESS! It spikes your insulin and makes you want to eat more stupid shit like that which just stores as fat.

  201. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    videogames can promote health!!!

    honestly dont go buy some glorified force feedback joystick. how about going out and doing something. or if you must play videogames, choose one that provides a strong aerobic workout like DDR.

  202. Nice try, but ... by Presence1 · · Score: 1

    ...this is not going to be any serious exercise. Maybe I'm missing something, but the demo showed no significant range of motion being used in ANY muscle. Of course, exercising through the full range of motion is critical to any serious fitness regimen.

    It is also possible that the thing is a real hazard. If that back/hip rest is placed a bit too high, and the user suddenly applies a lot of force with one or two legs, the stronger leg muscles could overwhelm the back muscles and cause an injury.

    As a lifelong serious competitor currently in training, I would ordinarily be 100% behind this type of development. But, it MUST be done right, and I don't think these guys have it, unless I'm missing something.

    One of the most promising things that I saw wasn't even designed as an exercise. It was a large screen video game where the player rode a stationary bike. The scenario was that you had bicycle-powered ornithopter-like aircraft and were involved in a race both around a course and picking off various bonus items. Wonderfully whimsical and well done. To control the craft you pressed the handlebars to turn and pedaled faster or slower to go up or down. Hours of laughs the first time we found it, and fun later.

    I can't criticize them because they weren't trying to create an exercise device, but I do bemoan the missed opportunity. This engaging scenario could have helped users exercise HARD for genuinely useful periods. In fact, the one distraction was that the pedals had no resistance, so were a bit harder to control. Ah, but for a generator and a resistive loop controlled by the software...

  203. hmm... by Cynikal · · Score: 1

    and they dont realize that the market they're targeting don't already have an overly developed arm as compared to the other?

  204. Re: bull this - bull that. by Eivind · · Score: 1
    I don't really disagree with you that "fortified" flour should be pointless. Varied eating will contain everything your body needs. It's not like the human body is evolved to needing a mixture of vitamine-pills and "fortified" foods to do well afterall.

    But I take issue with your other claims. They are, to put it bluntly also bullshit. There are very few, if any, vitamins, minerals or substances needed by the body that would in any way be lost by being powderized. What do you imagine vitamins are ? Small glass-pearls that get crushed in a mill ? Heat harms many vitamins. As does prolonged storage. As does, in some cases, exposure over a long time to uv-ligth. There's no nutrient that I'm aware of that takes any damage from being ground to a dust.

    You're rigth though that cutting calories help with loosing weigth. That's fairly obvious to anyone who doesn't live in la-la-land. And you're also rigth that many of the high-carb foods we eat today contain few useful nutrients beyond the raw carbs. (aka "empty calories")

  205. You're quick to call BS by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
    Sorry, my attempt to keep my rant down from 10 pages long, I did skimp on details. I didn't mean to imply that grinding wheat down would cause the loss of nutrients. Enriched Flour simply doesn't use the whole kernel:

    "Enriched/fortified bread is made from enriched white flour, which is milled from only the endosperm of the wheat kernel. "

    Not all complex carbohydrates carry the same nutritional benefits. "Refined" starchy foods like white rice, white pasta, white bread, and cereals made from "enriched wheat flour," lack the fiber and several of the nutrients that "whole grain" foods provide. In a sense, refined, starchy foods act more like simple sugars in the body and provide mostly empty calories.

    What is a "Whole Grain?"
    A whole grain has four parts: the germ (the nutrient-rich inner part), the endosperm (th soft white, starchy inside portion), the bran (the fibrous coating around the grain), and the husk (the outer inedible shell).

    What Is "Refinement?"
    Refinement is the process that removes all but the endosperm portion of the grain, leaving a white, nutrient-poor refined flour.

    What Is "Enrichment?"
    Enrichment is the process that adds back five nutrients to white, refined flour: iron, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and folic acid. All the other nutrients from the whole grain are still lost (magnesium, zinc, vitamin B6, cromium, vitamin E, and fiber).

    What's Considered "Whole Grain" and What Isn't?
    Use the following guidelines to make sure you are really getting whole grain products:

    *Cracked wheat, stoned wheat, wheatberry, 100% wheat, seven-grain, and multi-grain are all made from mostly refined grains, not whole grains.

    *Look for the word "whole" before "grain" or "wheat" on product labels. It also should be the first ingredient listed.

    Complexity of Carbs Link

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    1. Re:You're quick to call BS by Eivind · · Score: 1
      What you write here is all painfully obvious to anyone who has gone trough primary school. It's also got no relevance whatsoever to what I was writing.

      Everyone is aware that whole grain contains more minerals, more vitamins, more basically anything that's good for you than white flour.

      The problem still has nothing to do with the grinding though, as it is perfectly possible, and indeed common, to buy whole grain flour which is nevertheless *also* ground into a dust. (yes, if you like you can also buy it coarser-milled but that's still got no influence on nutritional value.)

    2. Re:You're quick to call BS by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      And that's why I wrote this:

      I didn't mean to imply that grinding wheat down would cause the loss of nutrients.

      Primary school doesn't teach any of this. And marketing in the name of the almighty dollar has definately made this NOT painfully obvious. Lucky Charms should not be AHA Healthy-approved. You're being a dickhead because I accidentally said grinding, which I've already admitted and corrected.

      The point of what *I* was saying, is that enriched flour is in almost all foods at the supermarkets these days: All famous brand cereals, pastas, crackers, breads, cookies, pastries. What other aisles are left in the supermarket? We live in a high carb world. Because it's cheap to make.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?