Slashdot Mirror


Google Social Network: Orkut

shelleymonster writes "According to CNET, Google has quietly released its own version of Friendster, called Orkut. About 3 months ago, Google entered into talks to acquire Friendster, but was turned down. Named after one of its engineers, Orkut Buyukkokten, the new social network looks even tougher to get into than Friendster. An initial 12,000 invitations were sent out, and new users can only join through an existing user. Someone want to invite me?"

623 comments

  1. Get Invited... by inertia187 · · Score: 2, Funny

    To get invited, just go to a Dave Matthews concert...duh!

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Get Invited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave Matthews Band

    2. Re:Get Invited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave Matthews Band is so boring

    3. Re:Get Invited... by shailu · · Score: 1

      Let me become it's member I'll open invitation for all with a small fee.. :-)

    4. Re:Get Invited... by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just call it clic.com?

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    5. Re:Get Invited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even better - clique.com.

    6. Re:Get Invited... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      The wave of shitty music made in GarageBand begins :)
      Nice sig :)

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    7. Re:Get Invited... by mirko · · Score: 2, Informative
      Nice one : in French (slang), a "clique" means
      • a group of people
      • or "some stuff"

      I guess the first applies to such a closed server (NB: it's not an offense, just some familiar word :)
      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    8. Re:Get Invited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why dip into French? That first definition applies in English as well, although it is derived from the French.

      The OP knew this, he was just too dumb to look up (or already know) the accurate spelling of the word.

    9. Re:Get Invited... by 2muchcoffeeman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's kind of like joining a country club. If you're not important enough to already know a member, you can't be a member.

      Which bring to mind one question: How'd these idiots find their first member?

      --
      Prevent Windows piracy. Use Linux instead.
    10. Re:Get Invited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To get invited, just go to a Dave Matthews concert...duh!

      And when you're done with the Dave Matthews concert (don't forget your t-shirts and your autographed bong!!!) you can just bop on down to the Hootie and the Blowfish concert. Those bands are todays equivalent of Barbara Streisand and Liza Minelli!

    11. Re:Get Invited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a little out of touch. The reason the OP made that comment is because Dave Matthews Band actually promotes distribution of their music via file sharing. So it's funny. Laugh.

    12. Re:Get Invited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much hype for something that's not even open to anyone except the google employees and the so called friends they've invited! Maybe its a marketing ploy to hype up something so much that when it does hit the road, people already assume its the leader in the field For a dating/networking site that is live now, visit http://www.friendsync.com - no need to wait for Orkut

    13. Re:Get Invited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which bring to mind one question: How'd these idiots find their first member?

      Presumably it was Orkut :)

    14. Re:Get Invited... by Quirk · · Score: 1

      This supposedly uber kewl network and no one from /. made it on the list. Tsk,tsk what does that say of Goggle's opinion of /. ?

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
    15. Re:Get Invited... by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      They probably say, "Get bent!"

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    16. Re:Get Invited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you for the definition, I never heard of a 'clique' before. You are a great educator. You should explain jokes for a living. seriously.

  2. Cliques rock! by cliffy2000 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I miss the old exclusive LiveJournal. Perhaps this can assuage my lost status?

    1. Re:Cliques rock! by fatalist23 · · Score: 1

      Aww, this is offtopic how? It's very interesting to note how some services start off as invite only; livejournal is an example which has recently migrated to a more open system where anyone can sign up for a journal. I wonder how long it will be before Orkut switches?

    2. Re:Cliques rock! by Hooded+One · · Score: 1

      LJ didn't start out as invite-only, and the invitation system wasn't ever intended to make it "exclusive" in any way. It was simply a way of throttling the load a little. Now that their capacity has expanded, they've removed the invite system.

      It's not like it was ever that hard to get yourself a code, anyway.

  3. Friendster? by cspenn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Friendster was hard to get into because of all those JSP errors. Orkut is by invitation only. Slight difference.

    1. Re:Friendster? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      How hard was it to get one of the original invitations? What criteria did they use to pick the initial 12000?

    2. Re:Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I received an invitation. From what I can tell, to have gotten one you have to be one of the beautiful, wealthy people.

      And I'm only allowed 1 invite every 3 months, so it is going to stay pretty exclusive.

    3. Re:Friendster? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you HAVE to ask, your not on the list...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet they just found all those cyber-shitheads that used to hang out in the private clubs on the WELL.

    5. Re:Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, but do some looking on this site...

      It is written in ASP! The webserver is running IIS! Google's solution to Friendster's bad JSPs is to launch a Microsoft ASP-driven website!?!?

      I can't believe that google would put their name on some IIS P.O.S. like this. The respect I had for google just got taken down a notch...

      Is this an early April Fool's post?

    6. Re:Friendster? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      My guess: The 12,000 initial members are the 12000 people who work for google.

    7. Re:Friendster? by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      .aspx files are .NET pages. The site may be written in VB.NET, C#, or a host of other languages.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    8. Re:Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, so how is it not running IIS? ASP.NET is just a new version of ASP. Great.

      So I should be MORE impressed that a Google engineer wrote a site in VB.NET and is deploying it on IIS?

      This is a dark, dark day for google and people that like google.

    9. Re:Friendster? by rwiedower · · Score: 1

      Maybe they just used the Amex Black Centurion list...that's probably about 12K right there. That plus Orkut himself, of course.

    10. Re:Friendster? by Trepalium · · Score: 1

      According to Netcraft: The site www.orkut.com is running Orkut's Palace of Love on Linux. Maybe they're using the Mono ASP.NET component.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    11. Re:Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to any invalid URL and you will see an IIS error page. Mono is deployed on apache or XSP, both of which have recognizable error pages.

      This is site is 100% windows.

    12. Re:Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You couldn't be more right.

    13. Re:Friendster? by ooby · · Score: 1

      Who is to say Orkut has any friends?

    14. Re:Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I didn't get invited either.

    15. Re:Friendster? by xRizen · · Score: 1

      ASP.NET is a version of ASP for dot-NET. There are more ways than one to use dot-NET.

    16. Re:Friendster? by xRizen · · Score: 1

      This is an IIS 404 page? Could have fooled me.

    17. Re:Friendster? by sl0wp0is0n · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Bill Gates got an invitation! :)

      --
      My other dog is a Wienerschnitzel.
    18. Re:Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's orkut.net you fucking retard. Go to orkut.com

    19. Re:Friendster? by Texas_Refugee · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

    20. Re:Friendster? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      He doesn't.

      What do you think he wrote this thing for?

    21. Re:Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay. I fail to see what's so IIS-like about it.

    22. Re:Friendster? by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      They might be using a load balancer running Linux (Apache?) in front of the IIS servers.

    23. Re:Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GENERATOR: Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.1
      CODE LANGUAGE: C#

    24. Re:Friendster? by haYs+for+hroses · · Score: 1

      not only was friendster also invite-only at the start, you also had to know the "beta code" to login.

  4. It won't be too hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    12 000 people, each invites three people, who invite three people, and so on... Hey, if it's good, everyone will be in it in no time.

    1. Re:It won't be too hard by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


      slashdotters don't know 3 people each if you discount both parents and Mittens the cat. :(

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:It won't be too hard by evilninja · · Score: 1

      Just be absolutely sure that none of your invitees are members of the RIAA/MPAA/etc.

    3. Re:It won't be too hard by airrage · · Score: 1

      Okay, now THAT was funny!

      --
      "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    4. Re:It won't be too hard by Lifewolf · · Score: 1
      slashdotters don't know 3 people each if you discount both parents and Mittens the cat.

      Mittens is already in there. Toonces the wardriving cat gets early access to all these things.

      --
      "Be Happy or Die." -- AoN
    5. Re:It won't be too hard by eclectro · · Score: 1

      slashdotters don't know 3 people each if you discount both parents and Mittens the cat. :(

      Excuse me, I have two cats, and their names are not Mittens.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    6. Re:It won't be too hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat's breath smells like cat food!

  5. Friends? Who needs friends! by Steamhead · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought those went out of fashion years ago...

    1. Re:Friends? Who needs friends! by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. We call them "buddies" now.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  6. Friendless by DaHat · · Score: 4, Funny

    So those of us who no one likes will never be let to join? And I thought my life was bad now! First I'm kept out of all of the real world social places... not the online ones too? Could it get any worse?

    Yes, the above is sarcasm!

    1. Re:Friendless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know how they picked the initial 12,000 invitees? Is this a who's who of the world?

    2. Re:Friendless by Otter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And how did I not make the initial list? Are there really 12,000 people better known to Google than me? In conversation, I now ask questions by prefacing them with gg: .

    3. Re:Friendless by grahamkg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, they could let you in and you realize you've got nothing in common with them - just like in the real world.

      --
      Graham
      Linux - Fast Pane Relief
    4. Re:Friendless by JuJue · · Score: 2, Funny

      Forget Orkut...I'm joining the Stonecutters

    5. Re:Friendless by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Yeah you don't even have to be invited to join the Stonecutters (they're prohibited from doing so). Just be a male of at least 18 (20 or 21 in some Grand Lodges) and petition your local lodge for the degrees.

      ;o)

  7. Orkut? by konichiwa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Named after one of its engineers, Orkut Buyukkokten

    They should have named it Buyukkokten! :(

    --
    Never argue with an idiot, he'll just lower you to his level and beat you with experience.
    1. Re:Orkut? by pio!pio! · · Score: 0

      bukkakeokten

    2. Re:Orkut? by tommck · · Score: 5, Funny

      or Bukkake for short....

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    3. Re:Orkut? by ellem · · Score: 5, Funny

      Didn't you get the memo from Tom Chiusano that we can't say Bukkake anymore?

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    4. Re:Orkut? by Java+Pimp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Buyukkokten!

      Looks like something one might hear while playing Street Fighter.

      --
      Ascalante: Your bride is over 3,000 years old.
      Kull: She told me she was 19!
    5. Re:Orkut? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...the killer whale

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Orkut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes for this thing just smacks of a big online circle jerk. My guess is the people who want to get invited, but have not, are the bitch in the middle...

    7. Re:Orkut? by Iorek · · Score: 1

      Absolutely!

      Buyuk-kokten!
      Hoy-ruhken!

    8. Re:Orkut? by tuffy · · Score: 5, Funny
      They should have named it Buyukkokten!

      Sorry, but Ogg already took that name for another codec. Expect Ogg Buyukkokten to arrive soon and deliver amazing, patent-free chocolate cake compression over TCP/IP.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    9. Re:Orkut? by anactofgod · · Score: 1

      Yukko?

      ---anactofgod---

      --

      ---anactofgod---

      "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
    10. Re:Orkut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When's the next Buyukkoktail party?

    11. Re:Orkut? by tommck · · Score: 1

      hehe... nice Howard reference. Tom's such an idiot

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    12. Re:Orkut? by agurkan · · Score: 3, Informative

      actually this sounds like a turkish name and turkish people usually go by their first name rather than last. politicians are the exception but even they sometimes go by their full names rather than only last. common example is the football players, few people know their last name even though they usually are very famous if they are good (or in good teams).

      --
      ato
    13. Re:Orkut? by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Tatsumakibuyukkokten

      --
      -no broken link
    14. Re:Orkut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a matter of fact Orkut is slang for orgasm in Finnish :)

    15. Re:Orkut? by LearnToSpell · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hate to tell you, but that's not chocolate cake dripping down your face...

    16. Re:Orkut? by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      I read that as "Buy You Cock Ten"

    17. Re:Orkut? by aytekin · · Score: 1

      He is Turkish. I knew it for sure when I saw this photo in his web page. I went to high school in Turkey too. So I know how it is... :)

    18. Re:Orkut? by squidfood · · Score: 2, Funny
      I read that as "Buy You Cock Ten"

      Since the first part (Buyuk) is "big" in Turkish you could be righter than you know.

    19. Re:Orkut? by jargoone · · Score: 3, Funny

      Didn't you get the memo that Howard Stern is washed up, and has an unfunny, scripted show that hasn't been good in years?

    20. Re:Orkut? by cubic6 · · Score: 1

      Chocolate cake compression sounds suspiciously like a bunch of overweight football fans in a warehouse, sitting on each cake one by one.

      --
      Karma: Contrapositive
    21. Re:Orkut? by austad · · Score: 1

      Bukkake means "Crude Hair" :)

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    22. Re:Orkut? by geekplus · · Score: 1
      I believe the name is of Turkish origin.

      At least, "Buyuk" (with umlautted u's) means "big" in Turkish, and Orkut is consistent with Turkish first names (but I haven't actually met an Orkut myself before).

      But I'd bet there's an umlaut over the "o" in the last name too, to match Turkish vowel harmony rules.

      Orkut -- lutfen bize anlatiniz!

    23. Re:Orkut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two words

      Artie Lang

      two more words

      you're gay

    24. Re:Orkut? by msmikkol · · Score: 1
      Named after one of its engineers, Orkut Buyukkokten

      They should have named it Buyukkokten! :(

      Why on earth? "Orkut" is hilarious enough. It's the plural of "orgasm" in Finnish!

      --
      The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error.
      -Bertolt Brecht
    25. Re:Orkut? by Op7imus_Prim3 · · Score: 1
      Looks like something one might hear while playing Street Fighter.

      I don't know about you, I but when I look at something I see it.

      Sound, on the other hand, I can hear.

    26. Re:Orkut? by Deslack · · Score: 0
      From his website, there are more:
      I have been told that I have a colorful personality and perhaps that is why my friends have given me more nicknames than I can remember. O-Man, Big-O, Orc, Yogi, Ivy's Bitch (if you were not there, never mind), Party Animal, OrCute, Orkuttino, Kooter, O, Dostum, and Smooth are some of the ones that I recall at the first hand. As you can probably guess, each nickname has its own saga to go with it. However, for those who are not familiar with the stories, "Orkut" works fine.
      Pick one.
      --
      .sigs are useless; it doesn't protect you from imposters.
    27. Re:Orkut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but when you look at a word, you hear the sound of it in your head. stop being difficult.

    28. Re:Orkut? by Daimaou · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. It means to drench someone or something with a lot of liquid.

    29. Re:Orkut? by Lobsang · · Score: 1

      Buyukkokten!

      Even worse... The name sounds like "Buy You a Cock or Ten", or something similar... So, never complain about your name again...

  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Don't Forget Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd appreciate an invite too...

    umm... mind if I bring along a couple thousand buddies?

    Thanks,
    A.C.

  10. WOO HOO! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Alright! Now thru the golden graces of Google, they've amassed all the collective might of the PhD's they employ to re-create the negative social effects of high school cliques and elitism!

    YAY!

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:WOO HOO! by goldspider · · Score: 1
      There's more to it than just that!

      Now the Ph.D's (who were assuredly excluded from all social circles in their high school years) now have their own cliques from which to exclude their grade-school nemeses!

      The geeks have finally gotten their ultimate revenge!!

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:WOO HOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A-FUCKING-MEN.

      I couldn't have said it better. The few times I've dropped in on sites like Friendster, I've been astonished at what a "high school" atmosphere it has. And in all the bad ways. A bunch of attention-starved girls looking for any dork on the internet to pay them a little attention and lots of losers and their regional "cliques" trying to make as many friends as possible.

      I can only imagine what kind of STDs are floating around in Friendster-like circles. These are the most vaccuous, inane, brain-dead, MTV-esque dregs you can find. Stay FAR away.

    3. Re:WOO HOO! by jrexilius · · Score: 1

      LOL!.. thats a great post.

      yeah, the provincial mindset and the desire to create cliques and hierarchies is what becomes popular on the net as the net becomes popular with the public. interesting how the net is ushering in an age of enlightenment and broader horizons freeing the masses from their normal social constraints..

    4. Re:WOO HOO! by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is a good thing. Have a popular site to allow people to continue their vacuous clique discrimination, and then stay away from them. The more they're circle jerking, the less they're bugging you.

    5. Re:WOO HOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're 100% right. I'm posting anonymously because of my Stanford ties, but this is precisely what (and who) Orkut is. There was a demo version built while he was at Stanford, and it was just a clique competition... you even got ranked (similar to PageRank) by the number of "important friends" you had. It's truly repugnant.

    6. Re:WOO HOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't describe Slashdot any better. Seriously.

    7. Re:WOO HOO! by mrogers · · Score: 1

      But the former nemeses will never know or care about the geeks' online cliques, so they've just succeeded in re-creating the chess club.

    8. Re:WOO HOO! by torpor · · Score: 1

      Imagine what this sort of tool would do in wrong hands ... oops, wait ... never mind.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  11. /. Fan by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Orkut? They'll have to do quite a bit of work to give their members the prestige that's associated with having a Slashdot fan.

  12. Invitation only society by PFactor · · Score: 5, Funny

    An invitation-only society will always become cannabalistic and/or inbred.

    I don't want to be invited into that!

    --
    Don't believe anything I say. I crash test crack pipes for a living.
    1. Re:Invitation only society by Sivar · · Score: 1

      So you predict Google users will start eating each other?

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    2. Re:Invitation only society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I invite you into the world community

    3. Re:Invitation only society by corbettw · · Score: 3, Funny

      An invitation-only society will always become cannabalistic and/or inbred.

      So, what, we should expect to hear banjos when loading the home page? How will this effect the search results for "squeal + pig"?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:Invitation only society by Halthar · · Score: 1

      If they start eating one another, does that mean that soon there will be Google Porn?

    5. Re:Invitation only society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      An invitation-only society will always become cannabalistic and/or inbred.

      So that implies breeding, right? Sounds better than my real life!

      <sigh>

    6. Re:Invitation only society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just stupid, and poor reasoning. Following your thinking, an inbred society does not imply its invitation-only. Also, it's not a very apt metaphor of the south -- Park Avenue is more "invitation-only" than the Deliverance. You are thinking "something-else-only."

      Pantywaist city folks when they meet rurual folks tend to question their own masculinity and usually get teased about being fags -- and they feel like fags next to "real people." I expect that the hollywood writers of Deliverance probably felt like fags when they met some "real rednecks" or bikers and tried, probably subconsciously, to get revenge by portrarying rednecks as fags.

      Betcha a dollar its true.

    7. Re:Invitation only society by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Aw, fuck it, i'll post as me. Mod me all you want.

      This is just stupid, and poor reasoning. Following your thinking, an inbred society does not imply its invitation-only. Also, it's not a very apt metaphor of the south -- Park Avenue is more "invitation-only" than the Deliverance. You are thinking "something-else-only."

      Pantywaist city folks when they meet rurual folks tend to question their own masculinity and usually get teased about being fags -- and they feel like fags next to "real people." I expect that the hollywood writers of Deliverance probably felt like fags when they met some "real rednecks" or bikers and tried, probably subconsciously, to get revenge by portrarying rednecks as fags.

      Betcha a dollar its true.

    8. Re:Invitation only society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know... inbreeding involves sex! Something most slashdotters are looking forward to having one day when they move out of the parents basement.

    9. Re:Invitation only society by corbettw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dude, lighten up. I wasn't saying Deliverance was an invitation only society, but it was inbred and cannabalistic. Whether it's an accurate depiction of the South or not is pretty much moot. It *is* a depiction, and one most people laugh at (even some Southerners).

      As for whether Southerners are real men or not, there is a reason the North won the war, ya know.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    10. Re:Invitation only society by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, you need to check yourself. How dare you ridicule southerners for exhibiting any type of stereotyping when you yourself are the A#1 example of stereotyping.

      "Do under others"

      Yes, I can lighten up -- but I can also see when people are *not* laughing with you, or laughing at life, but are being cruel -- because I grew up with racists. Your joke was in the same spirit as their jokes. Southerners get reamed whenever they make any comments like that -- rightly so, and they should work hard. You need to do it too.

      What I object to is the automatic injection of a negative stereotype of a people in a situtation that is utterly not related to that stereotype -- in the context, had their been *some* relation, it would have been funny. This is not.

    11. Re:Invitation only society by micromoog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Fact: 76% of people who use the word "fag" are closeted homosexuals. When "fag" is used more than once in the same sentence, it goes up to 93%.

    12. Re:Invitation only society by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      Context, context, context, context.

      Get it?

    13. Re:Invitation only society by djeaux · · Score: 1
      As for whether Southerners are real men or not, there is a reason the North won the war, ya know.

      In the end, sheer numbers (money & men) won out.

      There is a reason that the South held off the Northern invasion forces for five years, y'know?

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    14. Re:Invitation only society by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      'Pantywaist city folks when they meet rurual folks tend to question their own masculinity and usually get teased about being fags -- and they feel like fags next to "real people."'

      talk about yr negative stereotypes.

    15. Re:Invitation only society by spezz · · Score: 1
      I think you'd lose that dollar. James Dickey, the author of the novel and the screenplay was, by all accounts, a two fisted, two war (WWII and Korea) veteran from the south. So I don't think the point of the inbred rednecks was to get revenge on them for making him feel like less of a real man.

      I also don't think the rednecks are portrayed as "fags" but as scary, violent rapists. Having just seen it for the first time, it's more of a horror movie than anything else.

      I agree entirely that a reoccurring theme in the film is the softness of modern life vs. the rugged individualism of the past.

    16. Re:Invitation only society by micromoog · · Score: 1
      No.

      I also won't mention the fact that Deliverance wasn't written by a bunch of homosexual Hollywood screenwriters, but rather by the venerable James Dickey. Oops, I just did.

    17. Re:Invitation only society by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      They're both inbred and they're both invitation-only. At least, check out "high society" Philadelphia. Everyone is cousins.

      And you're not allowed in either one if you're a woman that refuses to be treated like an object.

      Deliverance was fiction. I don't know what the hell your problem is with his original comment. His followup is braindead, but...

      Pantywaist city folks when they meet rurual folks tend to question their own masculinity and usually get teased about being fags -- and they feel like fags next to "real people."

      Where the fuck is that coming from? In my city, the 240 lbs musclebound queer will win every contest of masculinity. I don't need to hang out with rednecks to question that. And if you pay a visit to my neighborhood, we'll see who's "real people."

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    18. Re:Invitation only society by lairdb · · Score: 1

      >> As for whether Southerners are real men or not, there is a reason the North won the war, ya know.
      > In the end, sheer numbers (money & men) won out.

      Industrialization.

      > There is a reason that the South held off the Northern invasion forces for five years, y'know?

      Marksmanship. (See Industrialization, lack of.)

      --
      "...and to everyone else out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together, guys."
    19. Re:Invitation only society by corbettw · · Score: 1

      In the end, sheer numbers (money & men) won out.

      Yeah, I know, I was just trying to get the other guy's goat. Ya gotta respect the determination the South showed, in keeping the North on the run for much of the time while not having anywhere near the same level of resources.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    20. Re:Invitation only society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So, what, we should expect to hear banjos when loading the home page?"

      Well, only if it's based in Saskatchewan.

    21. Re:Invitation only society by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      Relevant Simpsons quote:

      Kent Brockman : "Professor, without knowing precisely what the danger is, would you say it's time for our viewers to crack each other's heads open and feast on the goo inside?"

      Professor : "Yes I would, Kent."

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    22. Re:Invitation only society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they had more panty-waist city-boys to throw to the front?

    23. Re:Invitation only society by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Ooooh! You proved that Micromoog called himself a fag ! Damn! That's cold!

      What if he is queer, jackass?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    24. Re:Invitation only society by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Recall that most rape is not sexual, but rather about violence and power-struggles. Statistically, the majority of rapes are performed by men who are not sexually attracted to their victions, such as in prison or towards children (male/female) or towards the elderly, etc.

      The southerners in Deliverance are intended to be understood as being bitter and angry towards the northerners who are invading their land. In other words, it is an expression of the cultural ideology of resentment towards the north, amongst southerners.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    25. Re:Invitation only society by Patik · · Score: 1
      An invitation-only society will always become cannabalistic and/or inbred.
      Or inebriated, in the case of fraternaties.
    26. Re:Invitation only society by djeaux · · Score: 1
      Marksmanship. (See Industrialization, lack of.)

      Make that "marksMANship". Case rests. Now, if y'all will excuse me, I gotta go tend the still. It's over in the woods behind the trailer.

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    27. Re:Invitation only society by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      Okay, so the grandparent is +5 Funny, but a comment about the same topic is -1 offtopic?

      Riiiiiiiiiiiiighhhhhhhhhht.

    28. Re:Invitation only society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, come on down to North Florida, bitch.

    29. Re:Invitation only society by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

      Having just seen it for the first time, it's more of a horror movie than anything else.

      It's not a horror movie to me, it's just something utterly unrelated to the truth.

      Not to say you won't find scary experiences, but *that* set of scary experiences is utterly unrelated to the truth -- it's just a homoerotic fantasy. Burt Reynolds and Clint Eastwood did a bunch of subtly "gay" themed movies (Dirty Harry, Alcatraz, &c.) in the 1970s.

    30. Re:Invitation only society by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Why? I can have my masculinity challenged right here in San Francisco.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    31. Re:Invitation only society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > An invitation-only society will always become cannabalistic and/or inbred.
      And that's why you get in on the ground floor...

    32. Re:Invitation only society by JeremyALogan · · Score: 0

      imbreeding still involves sex... don't know many /.ers who'd turn THAT down

  13. Branching by Microlith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It'd be interesting to see how the contacts branch from the original 12,000 people.

    You could see how they branch, what countries they cross into, and how people relate to each other (interests, age, etc.)

    I wonder if this'd be something sociologists would like to watch...?

    1. Re:Branching by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      JESUS! Are you with Mensa also?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:Branching by Lew+Pitcher · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Given the "Kevin Baker" effect, it seems that anyone is at most 6 relationships away from anyone else. Potentially, the entire world could wind up being invited into this social network.

      Alternatly, current members could "target" high profile potential members by carefully selecting who they invite as members.

      So, who would you invite in order to get George Bush or Mike Fair into the network?

      --

      "values of beta will give rise to dom!"

    3. Re:Branching by Warped1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's Kevin Bacon.

    4. Re:Branching by Ba3r · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe its a secret plot to analyze internet communities and relationships, from which to extract information on quelching those upstart query ruining bloggers!

    5. Re:Branching by Lew+Pitcher · · Score: 1

      OK, my goof. I misrememberd the name.

      Now, how about we advocate that Kevin Baker be invited to join the community? Along with Kevin Bacon.

      <grin>

      --

      "values of beta will give rise to dom!"

    6. Re:Branching by camusflage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if this'd be something sociologists would like to watch...?

      Or the Department of Homeland Security...

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    7. Re:Branching by telstar · · Score: 5, Funny

      All they really had to do was invite Kevin Bacon, and we'd be all set....

    8. Re:Branching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      see contacts branching in huminity . Their new site allows you to search an see a zoom out of social maps. huminity's site layout is much more google like then this un-accepting-new members-site :) ... whats the use of the PR when you cant get in?

    9. Re:Branching by rmarll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if this'd be something sociologists would like to watch...?

      Though, you are seeing only those people entering the network who are
      A. Thought of as at least potentially interested in joining.
      B. Wouldn't think less of you for asking.

      I would like to know what sociologists think of these kinds of groups, and what purpose they serve.

    10. Re:Branching by jrexilius · · Score: 1

      can you mod a comment as both interesting and funny?..

    11. Re:Branching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would like to know what sociologists think of these kinds of groups, and what purpose they serve.

      I would like to know what purpose you serve, besides being the sex toy of countless anonymous men.

    12. Re:Branching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I wonder if this'd be something sociologists would like to watch...?"

      Maybe... but they're probably busy looking at /. kiddies who speculate about what sociologists might like to look at.

    13. Re:Branching by stevey · · Score: 1

      Yes I agree, I've not used friendster because I didn't really think it was too useful.

      But then I discovered Lighter Thief - a simple site designed to track cigarette lighters around the world.

      You sign up and create an ID for your lighter then tape it to the side. Give it to a friend and the URL can be used by them to input it's current location and how they got it.

      I have seen lighters that I "liberated" in Edinburgh end up in Paris, Amsterdam (I wonder why ;) and Sweden.

      Fun stuff .. I wish that had been my idea!

    14. Re:Branching by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it will be so badly skewed by the people allready offering invites all over chat networks everywhere.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    15. Re:Branching by bataras · · Score: 1

      Someone please post an invite to the mysql user mailing list

    16. Re:Branching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the laugh.

    17. Re:Branching by joebeone · · Score: 1

      sociologists watch this stuff and research it... NY Times recently ran a piece on danah boyd at UC Berkeley who studies friendster... she's got millions of connections.

    18. Re:Branching by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      "I don't think this issue merits any socilogical analysis" That's what they think.

  14. googoogaga by jimmi_bob · · Score: 4, Funny

    google continue their world domination attempts, next thing you know we'll have google linux, google word pro, and google tunes (gTunes?) ... they'll release it all in a single package and call it googogogol

    --
    Take away the right to say "fuck" and you take away the right to say "fuck the government." - Lenny Bruce
    1. Re:googoogaga by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      they'll release it all in a single package and call it googogogol

      Or "Googleplex", maybe...

    2. Re:googoogaga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goilent Green, anyone?

    3. Re:googoogaga by Lugor · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... Google Strings..(gStrings?)... umm.. nerds in gStrings.. ugh..

      yuck!

      Cranium soap please!

    4. Re:googoogaga by argStyopa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...and then /. will hate him like a holy Jihad, with every other story a lefthanded rant about how Google sucks, and how the world of mindless sheep computer users just don't properly appreciate the open-source alternatives (which are JUST AS GOOD even though they're:
      a) not as stable
      b) hell to install)

      Can I be modded +1, Prophetic?

      --
      -Styopa
    5. Re:googoogaga by sloptaco · · Score: 1

      ummm... we already have google linux:
      http://www.google.com/linux

      --sloppy

    6. Re:googoogaga by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      >> and google tunes (gTunes?)

      Heck, they've also got that elusive GSpot... I guess that one is invitation only too, and most /.ers haven't been invited. :)

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    7. Re:googoogaga by Niles_Stonne · · Score: 1

      Visit Google's new web portal...

      The "g" Spot

      --
      Sticks and Stones may break my bones, but copyright will always protect me.
    8. Re:googoogaga by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

      or googliprogtu.. sounds like a friggin amazonian muppet.

      --
      boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    9. Re:googoogaga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Right on the mizzoney!

    10. Re:googoogaga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod up!

    11. Re:googoogaga by dmayle · · Score: 1

      google tunes (gTunes)

      Personally, I'm waiting for Google Money, Google String, and my personal favorite, Google Spot!

    12. Re:googoogaga by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      ...and then /. will hate him like a holy Jihad, with every other story a lefthanded rant about how Google sucks, and how the world of mindless sheep computer users just don't properly appreciate the open-source alternatives


      But only after an extended period of time where searches through Google (or any attempt to access a Google service) would randomly lead to a green error screen with cryptic debug data - unofficially known as the "Green Screen of Goo".
    13. Re:googoogaga by Deslack · · Score: 0

      Since gspot.com, g-spot.com and googlespot.com are taken, they'd have no choice but to use google-spot.com instead.

      or spot.google.com

      --
      .sigs are useless; it doesn't protect you from imposters.
    14. Re:googoogaga by Clay_Culver · · Score: 1

      We do have a google for linux. http://www.google.com/linux It basically just adds "linux" to whatever your search term is. =)

  15. Google Company Directive by pcraven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...created Orkut.com in the past several months by working on it about one day a week--an amount that Google asks all of its engineers to devote to personal projects

    Ok, that is a cool company. I wish I was working at Google. But they haven't opened a software development office in Iowa yet.

    1. Re:Google Company Directive by DigitalBubblebath · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...by working on it about one day a week--an amount that Google asks all of its engineers to devote to personal projects

      Is it the Sunday?

    2. Re:Google Company Directive by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Yeah, about that Orkut project? I'm going to need you to work on it on Saturday. We lost a few people and we need to play catch up. Oh and while you're at it, why don't you come in on Sunday as well. Great.

      --
      -no broken link
    3. Re:Google Company Directive by openSoar · · Score: 1

      there is a company "80%/20%" policy that allows you to spend one day a week -i.e. 20% - on "your own" projects - reaching the next level in gta III counts but if you can demonstrate that it's something that might one day benefit google then you're set - it's a very forward thinking approach.

    4. Re:Google Company Directive by jannesha · · Score: 1

      That isn't such a rare practice (at least outside of the IT industry).
      I've known PhD chemists working for Big Pharma (TM) that are encouraged to spend 10% of their time (plus lab resouces) on 'pet projects'.

    5. Re:Google Company Directive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, now I know where Chia pets came from.

    6. Re:Google Company Directive by Afty0r · · Score: 1
      ...created Orkut.com in the past several months by working on it about one day a week--an amount that Google asks all of its engineers to devote to personal projects
      Ok, that is a cool company. I wish I was working at Google. But they haven't opened a software development office in Iowa yet.

      Indeed, because when you work on projects on your OWN time you own whatever comes of it... if you work on projects every wednesday while your company is paying you to do so, then THEY own whatever you come up with. Nice touch, huh?
  16. A New York State of Mind by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
    Someone want to invite me?

    Sounds like living in the Hamptons.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  17. Is it meant to compete with Friendster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Cause if it is, I don't see how it will. Friendster makes it far easier for people to join - and create their own social networks with their friends, because you don't need an invitation to join in the first place. That allows them to create a much larger userbase - even if it means isolated communities within the larger group.

    This on the other hand seems to want to create one large community, but it's based on the 12,000 people that got emails in the first place, which makes it much more restrictive and makes it much harder for new users to join and thus expand the userbase.

  18. Quite obnoxious by lysium · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What a nice, elitist piece of software. Please, how can I become part of this exclusive tribe? I would check the site, except it seems to completely lack details, other than the fact that no one is allowed to join.

    Why, exactly, is this on Slashdot?

    ===========

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:Quite obnoxious by Iaughter · · Score: 1
      This is on Slashdot because Google is cool, even though Google's accelerating proliferation of software/services is challenging their motto ('Don't be evil').

      Admittedly, we'd all like to see some duplication of the Window's toolbar for Gnome and the IE taskbar for Opera, but google is still a street creditable company with cool projects.

    2. Re:Quite obnoxious by kfg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Because shellymonster and michael share an inferiority complex?

      I'm still trying to figure out why it even exists.

      KFG

    3. Re:Quite obnoxious by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Why, exactly, is this on Slashdot?

      Because for the zillions of geeks here who couldn't care less about a "No Outsiders Allowed" club, it will be a pleasure watching their servers melt down under a good /.ing...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:Quite obnoxious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I would check the site, except it seems to completely lack details, other than the fact that no one is allowed to join.

      Sounds like Cartmanland.

    5. Re:Quite obnoxious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Otherwise known as "where chubby chicks can find sleazy losers and get a hookup".

      I've seen this shit in operation. It really IS pathetic.

    6. Re:Quite obnoxious by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 1

      Right... well I actually think the same is true about Linux.

    7. Re:Quite obnoxious by joshmccormack · · Score: 1

      Like a club in NYC. You can't find it, and if you can, they don't want you there, or at least they act that way.

    8. Re:Quite obnoxious by rmarll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Especially in that "exclusive" here just doesn't mean much.
      Certainly this isn't about keeping people out, more a mechanism to get people to want to be in. There isn't any meaningful criteria to be met in order to get in.

      The phrase "I belong to Orkut." is about the same as... I'm a nerdy computer geek in search of validation.

      While exclusivity does have it's place for certain things (rock climbing afficinados for instance) exclusivity for the sake of exclusivity serves as more of a warning for the rest of us about their members.

      I'll be generous, and suppose that the purpose here is to provide a mechanism to meet people that your "friends" know but you don't, or are perhaps more "safe".

      Fact is though, the world is filled with all kinds of people and in my experience, ranom and agressive friendlyness is still generally more effective (and fun) than trying to cull from a list of people who you really still know nothing about.

    9. Re:Quite obnoxious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose everything you do is open to the public? Birthday parties? Weddings? Do you advertise these things and allow anybody to show up?

    10. Re:Quite obnoxious by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      To give Slashdot visitors, more exactly the hacker crowd, an opportunity to hack into the restricted Okkorkokutt area.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    11. Re:Quite obnoxious by Phenylene · · Score: 0

      Or, perhaps it's a BETA test limited to a small number of people so that they can test and scale the system out intelligently and avoid the friendster mess? Nah, that couldn't be it... then you'd have no reason to be all self righteous on slashdot.

    12. Re:Quite obnoxious by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Not all "invitation-only" schemes are elitist. Check out my own dumb idea, if you believe otherwise.

      Hmm, I must admit this one seems to strive for the "exclusive for exclusivity's sake" element.

      PS I've still got slots open for 6 networking-savvy people outside the USA. ;)

    13. Re:Quite obnoxious by kajoob · · Score: 1

      so you're saying you didn't get an invite?

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    14. Re:Quite obnoxious by Kylow · · Score: 1

      Google has street cred now? WTF?

    15. Re:Quite obnoxious by n3k5 · · Score: 1

      Yay, right, let's /. the Google servers!

      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
  19. Re:Hey, Linux professionals by angryelephant · · Score: 0

    you can buy MatLab for Linux. I think there is even a RedHat specific version.

  20. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by panic911 · · Score: 1

    Good question. all my friends were on it so i joined, and it's so frusturating. During the day it will take 20 to 30 seconds to login and load up a page, and it really isn't that cool...

  21. To quote Groucho Marx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wouldn't join any club that would have me as a member. =)

    1. Re:To quote Groucho Marx by dane23 · · Score: 1

      Actually I think Marx stole that from Clemens.

      --


      Warning! Keep Out of Eyes! Wash Out with Water! Don't Drink Soap! Dilute! Dilute!
    2. Re:To quote Groucho Marx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No..Groucho didnt steal that from anyone. He acutally said.

      "I wouldnt want to be a member of any club that would want me as a member"

    3. Re:To quote Groucho Marx by sloptaco · · Score: 1

      No Groucho was drinking with Cantor and stole it from him!!

      --sloppy

    4. Re:To quote Groucho Marx by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but that's what Woody Allen says in Annie Hall. ``To quote Groucho Marx, I'd never want to be a part of any club that would have me as a member. That's how I am with women.'' Of course, he also ways, ``don't know masturbation. At least it's sex with someone I love.''

    5. Re:To quote Groucho Marx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't want you either.

    6. Re:To quote Groucho Marx by JM+Apocalypse · · Score: 1

      You missed half the joke!

      The other half is at Lore Brand Comics.

      Yay!

      --

      - - - - - - -
      Orppf urp mf y.ppcxn. yflcbi otcnnov C am yflcbi yr n.apb Ekrpatv (Dvorak -> Qwerty)
    7. Re:To quote Groucho Marx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALERT! goatse link!

    8. Re:To quote Groucho Marx by JM+Apocalypse · · Score: 1

      That's not even funny anymore! From now on, you're #4 on my hit list, right after Elvis but before Hitler's Alien Baby.

      --

      - - - - - - -
      Orppf urp mf y.ppcxn. yflcbi otcnnov C am yflcbi yr n.apb Ekrpatv (Dvorak -> Qwerty)
  22. Re:Sad News Captain Kangaroo, dead at 76 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sucks, Captain Kangaroo was the man. I watched him every Saturday back when I was five or six years old.

  23. What a way to attract users.... by TiMac · · Score: 3, Interesting
    By rejecting those that click the "Join" button. Why even have a Join button then?

    Frankly, I think they can go screw themselves....I won't hunt down a way to get into "the clique" and may not even if a friend invites me.

    --

    1. Re:What a way to attract users.... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      and may not even if a friend invites me

      If somebody would invite me, I would join, provided that it's free (cheap bastard that I am).

      Chances are, I don't know anybody who got invited. I might someday, six degrees of separation and everything.

      If nobody invites me... I ain't gonna lose sleep over it.

      --
      No sig
    2. Re:What a way to attract users.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, I'm building an invitation-only website myself. the reason it is invitation only is because unlike other sites which are aimed at areas of interest (film for instance), mine will be aimed at a group of friends whose perspectives i know and opinions i trust. that way when i ask for an opinion on a certain movie, and "bob" says he thought it sucked... i know bob and know that usually when he hates a movie, i'll love it! i'm wary of professional critics and get more useful info from my friends. there's other benefits to an online forum that is restricted... like not having to set your filter to mod threshold of 4 or 5!

    3. Re:What a way to attract users.... by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

      > ejecting those that click the "Join" button.

      It's like a reverse of

      "I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member." -- Groucho Marx

      in that they only have members who don't want to join....

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    4. Re:What a way to attract users.... by veneficus · · Score: 1

      You know, this is a good point. However, I am a flagrant Friendster addict and as such, will find any way possible to get into the Orkut community...

      Not because I need to, but because it's very, very amusing and hey, I like sociology. Maybe it's one big ploy to see what people on the internet will do if they're faced with a bunch of people being big jerks...

      "YOU CANT BE IN OUR CLUB, IT'S UBERGEEKS ONLY!"

      heh.

      --
      -- Hey, what the hell, it's only slashdot..
  24. Sup-paar website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think their layout could use some work, and the color scheme. Really sub-par for Google work.

  25. nice try... by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    but it still won't keep out the riff-raff

  26. Kinda creepy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like some cheesy, sub-Match.com/Yahoo Personals on-line dating agency. Hmm. Let me see. Hook up the biggest search provider and web archive in the world with my personal information and friends. And cookies.

    No thank you :-)

  27. MOD PARENT DOWN!! IMPERSONATION!! by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

    MOD PARENT DOWN!! IMPERSONATION!

    Look closely at his name! RAY_R_NOND? looks like raymond but spelled rayrnond. See it?

    See the FAQ

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!! IMPERSONATION!! by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
      BWAHAHA!

      Over the last few years, numerous restrictions have been placed on accounts to make this difficult (for example the system won't let you create an account named 'CmdrTaco' because there already is one listed)

      So they don't allow you to create a new account... if the name is already used! holy shit! quick, get a patent!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!! IMPERSONATION!! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. I doubt Eric Raymond would post that ;^)

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    3. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!! IMPERSONATION!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jeez, have you been watching Inspector Gadget again?

      grow up..

  28. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by kfg · · Score: 0

    Can anyone explain why it is so popular?

    No.

    KFG

  29. baaaa by happyfrogcow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    yet another way for people to make themselves feel popular and socially accepted while being a commodity for someone else.

    get over yourselves and do something useful.

    1. Re:baaaa by Incognitius · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, "yet another way"? What are some of the other ways that people have been commodities for others?

    2. Re:baaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they did that already.

    3. Re:baaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was actually thinking "this reminds me of those jackasses on The Sims Online" and the SIMS "web of friendship" and all of that crap. Only on a more pathetic scale.

      Honestly, the trite assholes who use these "social networking" sites can have it to themselves for all I care. I have seen the kind of people that frequent then and they're a really senseless and selfish crowd. Think "modified valley girl".

      I've found they're typically the kind that would put someone down because they're not wearing brand name sneakers and think that "geeks" are the lowest form of life and watch "Dawson's Creek" and listen to that stupid Kelis "milkshake song" while hanging with their over-maked-up'd wigger friends. And putting out to every guy they find online that makes them feel "special".

    4. Re:baaaa by glinden · · Score: 1

      This whole social networking fad -- Friendster, Tribe, LinkedIn, etc. -- does seem to play off people's egos. I'm still wondering if there's any real value to being in one of these social networks other than the minimal ego boost you get from admiring your mighty network. Is there anything that these tools offer that a mailing list doesn't?

      For example, LinkedIn seems to have a big focus on finding business contacts for jobs, consulting, or whatever that might be a couple hops away in your social network. But it's time consuming to use Linked In in this way and the contacts I've gotten through the network aren't particularly useful or interesting.

      Is there something more here? Has anyone else find any real value from social networking sites?

    5. Re:baaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with your overall sentiment, knocking the Creek is just not cool man.

    6. Re:baaaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh, it's for finding relatively 'safe' people to sleep with. I wouldn't expect you to understand.

    7. Re:baaaa by lamp540 · · Score: 0
      Is there something more here? Has anyone else find any real value from social networking sites?

      Isn't there a value in meeting new people that you can trust? That's what it's all about: establishing trust with minimal overhead.

  30. Invite yourself? by Speare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems to me, that once you've been invited, you can "invite" your web-driven robot, which can offer a backdoor for many other random people you don't know.

    It's like saying you can't get into a brick-and-mortar "gated community." Unless you're a pizza delivery guy. Or any of his friends.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Invite yourself? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      I did repo work with a friend of mine in the Bay Area because repoing cars is pretty damned fun. Ah, the dot com bombing was a great and profitable time.

      Gated communities aren't a problem to get in. Very rarely are gated communities hard to drive in. And when they wouldn't let us in with the repo truck, like when we were after a couple of MC Hammer's Land Rovers, we would just walk in.

      As an aside, I was rated +5 insightful talking about gay monkey pr0n. I love slashdot.

    2. Re:Invite yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's like saying you can't get into a brick-and-mortar "gated community." Unless you're a pizza delivery guy.
      Funny but true story. A friend of mine is a driver for Papa John's. Yes, it's true that gated communities, apartment complexes with keypad entry, etc. have a "pizza guy code" that you can punch in to open the gate without having to buzz the person you're visiting.

      My friend was dating a girl who lived in a gated apartment complex. Because it was easier to punch in the "pizza guy code" he legitimately knew, than to scroll through the electronic directory, find her name, and punch in her specific code, he always used the "pizza guy code" to visit her when he wasn't working. Well one day he drives in, the two of them are in their apartment, and there's a knock at the door... It was the cops.

      The property managers had repeatedly seen his car (minus the Papa John's roof sign) entering the premises with the "pizza guy code," and had called the cops to report it. My Slashdot ethos has a hard time figuring out whether this was bad (1984! Cameras everywhere!) or good (responsible property management), but it sure gave our circle of friends a laugh.

      But your point stands, the human is always the weakest link in any security or social chain.
    3. Re:Invite yourself? by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      Any intelligent developer would tie the invitee to the account that sent the invite.

      If they notice a whole bunch of crap going on all they have to do it shut off that account and everyone who was invited by that account (and so on... if you think of the invitation chain as a tree). Damage control would be simple eh?

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    4. Re:Invite yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that may in fact be a true story, but you assertion that it is funny is patently false. I failed to even smile during any portion of it. I kept waiting for the funny party, but it just never came.

    5. Re:Invite yourself? by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

      Ah, but what if people can be invited by more than one person? Now you need reference counts.

      And what if people can retroactively invite someone already there? Now you need friend garbage collection. "OK, everybody, line up for the old mark-and-sweep."

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
    6. Re:Invite yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how is that different than flesh-space?

      (omg it took me less than 20 seconds to type that...)

    7. Re:Invite yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but what if people can be invited by more than one person? Now you need reference counts.

      And this would be a problem... why? It's just software and using simple techniques at that. Nothing special here.

      And what if people can retroactively invite someone already there?

      Same thing. This is a trival problem, move along.

  31. oo, shiny web site by AEton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1) Wow, it's even more cliquey than C2! Well, almost.
    2) The Orkut website is really pretty.
    This is typical for Google. How do they get the text to fade in on page load? It's really neat. Look at the TOS page for an example - you see the pink/purple orkut.com's for a while, and then the rest of the text fades in. Is this just a simple CSS thing I should know but don't because I'm stupid?
    3) Check out the "golden key" icon (at their privacy policy). It's amazing! lol

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:oo, shiny web site by CaptainBaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's just javascript and css - the javascript darkens the rgb values of the text progressively in a setTimeout(), until it hits the maximum. not very Accessible, but looks pretty...

    2. Re:oo, shiny web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2.) Javascript. Nothing new. Pretty lame.

    3. Re:oo, shiny web site by zellyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Javascript changing text color of the CSS attribute assigned to most text. Look for the sa() function.

    4. Re:oo, shiny web site by SymphonicMan · · Score: 1

      re: fade in. They use javascript, slowly decreasing the rgb values from 255 to 0 (white to grey to black). Look at the source.

    5. Re:oo, shiny web site by Feztaa · · Score: 3, Funny

      I especially like the "join orkut" page... I was expecting it to say "haha, loser! go away!"

    6. Re:oo, shiny web site by mansemat · · Score: 5, Informative
      Right Click > View Source

      This is only art of it, but it's the color changing part...
      <script>
      col=255;
      function sa() { document.getElementById("ws").style.color="rgb(" + col + "," + col + "," + col + ")"; col-=5; if(col<0) col=0; if(col>0) setTimeout('sa()', 10); }
      </script>
      --
      --
    7. Re:oo, shiny web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      View source. Look for the script tag. Enjoy.

    8. Re:oo, shiny web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fade in...check the source code. For those to lazy:

      col=255;
      function sa() { document.getElementById("ws").style.color="rgb(" + col + "," + col + "," + col + ")"; col-=5; if(col>0) setTimeout('sa()', 10); }

    9. Re:oo, shiny web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That fades not a css thing:

      function sa() { document.getElementById("ws").style.color="rgb(" + col + "," + col + "," + col + ")"; col-=5; if(col0) setTimeout('sa()', 10); } onLoad="sa()"

    10. Re:oo, shiny web site by Morgon · · Score: 1

      Looking at the source of the page, it's javascript.
      All text in the span id "ws" is white, then JS identifies it and incriments its RGB color.

      --
      [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
    11. Re:oo, shiny web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The other key part is the "onload" event.
      <body onLoad="sa()">Yadda yadda yadda</body>
    12. Re:oo, shiny web site by Ark42 · · Score: 1


      Why do I only see white text on a white background?

    13. Re:oo, shiny web site by iamsure · · Score: 1

      How is that not accessible?

      Without javascript, the text colors dont change, and with javascript, they end with black on background color..

      What isnt accessible about it?

    14. Re:oo, shiny web site by greguly · · Score: 1

      Because it starts white.

      If your browser doesn't groks/has javascript ( none at all or not turned on ), then unless you can see white letters on a white background there will be no text for you to read !

    15. Re:oo, shiny web site by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
      Because it starts white.

      The first thing that the JS does is turn the text white. The text is black before the JS runs.

    16. Re:oo, shiny web site by jakupovic · · Score: 1

      Please stay in your room until we are able to locate you ....


      From the Orkut TOS page Other examples of illegal or unauthorized uses include, but are not limited to: modifying, adapting, translating, or reverse engineering any portion of the orkut.com service; removing any copyright, trademark or other proprietary rights notices contained in or on the orkut.com service;

      --
      You always point your finger at the bad guy, but what if the bad guy points his finger at you?
    17. Re:oo, shiny web site by greguly · · Score: 1

      Sorry but it starts white.

      Do a simple test: turn off javascript

      If it started black ( as you 'sugested' ),
      this accessability issue would be eliminated.

    18. Re:oo, shiny web site by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      Wow, it's even more cliquey than C2!

      Ha ha :) C2 is cliquey because it's still in beta. Neither the hardware nor the software is ready for the number of users that being open to the internet weould bring.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    19. Re:oo, shiny web site by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
      Do a simple test: turn off javascript

      I did that simple test before I posted. Works for me -- the text starts black and stays black. The only text that's white is the tiny About/Privacy/etc. stuff at the bottom.

      And yes, I poked throught the HTML and the CSS to confirm that. I'm running Mozilla 1.4b on Linux, here. You?

    20. Re:oo, shiny web site by badzilla · · Score: 1

      Me too... I think it's because I run Proxomitron to filter out popups and crap. Just use "select all" highlighting off your browser's menu to bring it all into sharp relief.

      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    21. Re:oo, shiny web site by Lumpy · · Score: 1


      col=255;
      function sa() { document.getElementById("ws").style.color="rgb(" + col + "," + col + "," + col + ")"; col-=5; if(col0) setTimeout('sa()', 10); }



      that is how they do that.... not terreibly difficult or origional.... but it is a cool effect anyways.
      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    22. Re:oo, shiny web site by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Moz 1.6, Linux.

      Starts white, and CSS confirms _that_.

      All text is in span class W, and css sayeth: .W { color: #FFFFFF }

    23. Re:oo, shiny web site by ispeters · · Score: 1

      The default colour scheme is black-on-white. The body element's onload event initiates the JavaScript, which converts it to white-on-white, and then fades the text back to black. If you have JavaScript turned off, you'll get black-on-white with no fade-in, so I'd say the accessibility problem is finding someone to invite you in.

      Ian

  32. Too bad Friendster didn't make a deal by TokyoBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They (friendster) really could _really_ use the horse power google has. It can be _very slow_ sometimes and I constanly get messages that my network cannot be traced from me to someone in my network. Hmmmm. I really like Friendster but Orkut may have the backend power to make social networking a more friendly experience.

  33. I saw this and got really excited! by Cytlid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does the fact that I don't need this service mean I have a life?

    --
    FLR
    1. Re:I saw this and got really excited! by doublem · · Score: 1

      Not quite.

      It means that:
      a. You have a real life with real friends
      b. You're a hermit who can't even keep together an online relationship.

      Since I'm a nice guy who tries to think the best, I'll assume "a"

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    2. Re:I saw this and got really excited! by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      No, it means you're in denial.

      --
      hey!
    3. Re:I saw this and got really excited! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I saw this and got really excited!

      And now you need a hand towel?

  34. Re:Just to let you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hummmm. Just another way to turn a friend into a f**k friend.

  35. Call me pessimistic... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... but while "invitation only" to begin with, doesn't necessarily ensure the quality of the network in the future. All of us have some "good" friends, as well as "bad" friends. The people with more questionable ethics could even go as far as auctioning an invitiation on ebay or something similar.

    All forms of socialization over the internet seem to start out with loads of potential, but in the end, they all suffer from the scum that tends to surface.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Call me pessimistic... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Invite Only allows them to more easily police the network and allows for a mechanism to prevent spamming. Find a spammer? Remove him...then remove any users that joined due to his invitation. Oh, and remove the guy who INVITED him.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Call me pessimistic... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny

      And remove upstream until all associations are removed, to the root invitee. Then Remove all the association down from that same invitee.

      Call it "Pruning the tree".

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Call me pessimistic... by sben · · Score: 1
      TheRealMindChild:
      while "invitation only" to begin with, doesn't necessarily ensure the quality of the network in the future.

      If I were doing this service, I'd start with it invitation-only, to help shake out bugs and performance and usability issues, and then, when it's ready to go live, open it to the public without invitation. Google/Orkut might be doing this. Friendster might have benefitted from this process (or, if they did that, from an extended form of the process).

      (Of course, at a certain point, "invitation only" becomes equivalent to "open to the public", more or less, as TheRealMindChild implies. That might be a nice way to do a "soft launch" -- let it "naturally" ramp up, rather than opening the floodgates.)

    4. Re:Call me pessimistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All forms of socialization over the internet seem to start out with loads of potential, but in the end, they all suffer from the scum that tends to surface.

      Ah, so that explains Slashdot....


      Or so says a lowly Anonymous Coward.

    5. Re:Call me pessimistic... by npsimons · · Score: 1
      All forms of socialization over the internet seem to start out with loads of potential, but in the end, they all suffer from the scum that tends to surface.


      Just like real life! Hmm, perhaps this isn't a problem with the technology, but a problem with the society? Or perhaps it's a problem with humanity itself?

    6. Re:Call me pessimistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give them an option:
      1) removal
      2) use a baseball bat

    7. Re:Call me pessimistic... by revery · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they manage this by making it a pyramid like scheme.

      User A1 through A10 were brought in under user A. If user B suddenly has 50 or more friends under him (or whatever metric they deem significant), you might just prune him and all of his friends. Or they may have a limit on the number of friends you can bring in.

      Interesting concept though.

      --

      Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
      or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.

  36. Join Orkut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't you think it's a bit stupid that they have 2 buttons on the home page that say "Join Orkut" that redirect people to a page that say they can't really join...

  37. Re:Been done by tepples · · Score: 1

    But at least in Advogato, you can see a list of existing members in order to contact them through external channels to get certified, unlike in what I saw during 30 seconds of browsing orkut.com.

  38. so when will they open googleporn.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check the whois, they own it.

    whois google.com
    whois googleporn.com

    that is the social search i'm waiting for!

    1. Re:so when will they open googleporn.com by theguru · · Score: 1

      You seem to be looking for
      http://www.booble.com/
      I'm sure Google owns googleporn.com just so no one else would buy it and use it, not because they have any attention of using it themselves.

    2. Re:so when will they open googleporn.com by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google has in recent months taken up a strategy of buying up every website with "google" in their domain name in a brand-image protection spree. They recently got computer parts storeGoogleGear.com to change its name to ZipZoomFly.com... which was a very interesting case because Google had no legal leg to stand on... the computer gear store had named its mascot a "Google" before the search engine existed, the sites looked completely different, and the computer gear store didn't do web searching and the web searching company didn't sell computer gear.

      The deal was apparently struck quietly, but clearly some cash was paid. There never was any media coverage of the event, and I'm pretty sure the terms of the deal reqires the computer gear store to not disclose how much they got.

    3. Re:so when will they open googleporn.com by Anonymous+Shepard · · Score: 1

      They already have their "safe search" for images. Maybe they could just reverse that...

      --
      I have a life. I really do. I've just chosen to ignore it.
    4. Re:so when will they open googleporn.com by ruvreve · · Score: 1

      The surface appearance to the common person would be that www.googlegear.com is directly related to www.google.com because Google has become a well-known name among even the non-tech savvy. Google knows this and probably paid a small amount of money now instead of paying lawyers a proportionally large sum of money later when www.googlegear.com decided to not 'just sell computer parts'.

    5. Re:so when will they open googleporn.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Booble.com. Try it.

  39. Diversification before IPO? by netwiz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems to me that Google could very well be sitting on a large pool of cash that might make it worth some corporate raiders' time to finance a huge takeover and pay for it out of that pool of money. If Google purposely diversifies their operation to initiatives that might not ever turn a profit, they can reduce that pool prior to IPO. Might not be the brightest choice right out of the box, but given that their price is sure to reduce over two-three quarters post-IPO, it'll reduce their attractiveness to a takeover attempt.

    Of course, being private at this time, none of this has any basis in fact. Although, the fact that Google's probably going to spend $25mil on this suggests that they really do have stupid piles of cash, and can afford to potentially toss big chunks of it away on potential failures.

    1. Re:Diversification before IPO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your arguments are without merit and baseless. I was so upset with your lack of knowledge in this subject that I had to post. In your argument, you assume that companies diversify to get rid of cash before IPOs so that someone else won't buy them. Companies release maybe 5-10% of the outstanding shares during an IPO. Unless a corporate raider can find a way to get access to the other 90+% that's not in the float, the company would be safe as secure. Plus, if someone tried to buy all the stock, the price would increase. Not all investors automatically jump at a tender offer above market price. We've seen that in other areas of tech.

      Secondly, you state that "Google's probably going to spend $25mil on this." Apparently, you haven't read any of the articles. This is a one-man project run by an employee. Google allows their employees 20% free time to work on whatever they want. A similar policy helped 3M go from mining to masking tape to post-it notes. It's a great way to innovate. Anyway, Google is not putting its resources behind this in the way you state. They do not need $25mil to complete this. It's not a distinct entity that requires all the overhead of a regular business, which would necessitate all that VC-like funding. You do not know what you're talking about. Please stop wasting our and your time with meaningless dribble. Go take a class or two in finance and get back to us when you understand what you're talking about.

    2. Re:Diversification before IPO? by wildwood · · Score: 1

      Okay, sounds good so far...

      My question is, if they're sitting on stupid piles of cash, why go public at all? Can't they think of non-stock-option ways of perking employees? Like profit-sharing bonuses, and such.

      I still don't understand why they would go through with an IPO, unless early investors are looking to cash out...

      --
      normal(adj)- people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots [DECS]
    3. Re:Diversification before IPO? by netwiz · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the heads up.

      too bad you posted anonymously. you could have scored some real karma with an analysis like this. Heck, if I could mod in a thread in which I'd posted, I'd bump this as much as possible.

      Slashdot needs more people w/ real experience to bring facts to the table like this.

    4. Re:Diversification before IPO? by netwiz · · Score: 1

      Most early investors would be looking to cash out. That's what most VC guys do, AFAICT.

      IPOs aren't about perking employees. They're about ROI for venture capitalists, and huge bonuses for the executive management. Other reasons include raising cash for business expansion, but that seems to be kind of a side benefit these days.

      oooh! I can hear another AC rant on how wrong I am coming!

    5. Re:Diversification before IPO? by theMerovingian · · Score: 1

      So they can do it like Dell:

      Issue enormous stock options to company insiders, and do "stock repurchases", regardless of share price, using company funds. This results in no net dilution of the shares' value - it is essentially using the investors' money to make a profit, which the execs are paying to themselves.

      See this for more details.

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    6. Re:Diversification before IPO? by intuition · · Score: 1
      worth some corporate raiders' time to finance a huge takeover and pay for it out of that pool of money

      Do you think the owners of Google are stupid?

      If Google has a large pile of cash, the negotiation floor for buying Google or taking it public is its cash on hand. (assuming they don't have any huge liabilities)

    7. Re:Diversification before IPO? by SumoRoach · · Score: 1

      Another reason not mentioned might be acquisitions. The piles of cash they're sitting on is nothing compared to the piles of company equity they could be sitting on.

  40. A Guaranteed Hit in Finland... by BPFH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...where the word "orkut" is the colloquial plural of "orgasm".

    The potential is huge. Eventually both Finns currently reading slashdot will join, and will be largely disappointed.

    -bpfh

    --
    -BPFH
    1. Re:A Guaranteed Hit in Finland... by BPFH · · Score: 1

      ohh, there's an echo here.
      OHH, THERE'S AN ECHO HERE.

      -bpfh

      --
      -BPFH
    2. Re:A Guaranteed Hit in Finland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "both Finns" ????
      Linus and who else?

    3. Re:A Guaranteed Hit in Finland... by Morgon · · Score: 1

      I guess that explains the creator's name and how he, himself, was created...

      Silly parents.

      --
      [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
  41. I don't know why everyone make so many jokes.. by msimm · · Score: 4, Funny

    about these things. I met my best friend, my wife and my rabbi on friendster. I'm not even jewish!

    ;-) Sorry.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:I don't know why everyone make so many jokes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [ I met my best friend, my wife and my rabbi on friendster. I'm not even jewish!]

      Er, if you're not practicing the jewish faith how can you say you met your rabbi?

      Unless you were trying being witty.

      Which you failed.

    2. Re:I don't know why everyone make so many jokes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know they had female rabbis.

      Or was there a typo and really meant 'my "wife" and my rabbi'.

    3. Re:I don't know why everyone make so many jokes.. by NihilSmurf · · Score: 1

      > I didn't know they had female rabbis.

      It's not such a simple question, since there is no centralized authority on Jewish law. Here in the US, the reform, reconstructionist, and conservative movements of Judaism allow female rabbis. Reform female rabbis are actually relatively common.

    4. Re:I don't know why everyone make so many jokes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know they had female rabbis.

      Hey, you just gave away the punchline to a joke nobody got. +1, Smarter Than Everyone Else. :)

    5. Re:I don't know why everyone make so many jokes.. by wass · · Score: 1
      totally offtopic, but my synagogue (ie, the one that I went to w/ my family when I was growing up) just hired a new rabbi, who is female. It's a reform synagogue, if anyone's curious.

      Also, the old rabbi who just retired has a wife who's also a rabbi.

      --

      make world, not war

    6. Re:I don't know why everyone make so many jokes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a guy and I met my boyfriend and now husband on friendster. And I'm not even gay!

    7. Re:I don't know why everyone make so many jokes.. by femibots-r-us · · Score: 1

      There have been female ordained Rabbis since 1972. Rabbi Sally Priesand was the first Jewish woman to be ordained as a Rabbi, by the Reform Movement. Since then, all sects of Judaism, except the Orthodox, have supported within the pattern of Jewish law, ordaining women as Rabbis and Cantors. In an estimated 10 years there will be women ordained "Rabbis" by the Orthodox branch of Judaism. However, they will most likely be referred to as something other than Rabbi. "If statistics are right, the Jews constitute but one percent of the human race. It suggests a nebulous dim puff of stardust lost in the blaze of the Milky way. properly, the Jew ought hardly to be heard of, but he is heard of, has always been heard of. He is as prominent on the planet as any other people, and his commercial importance is extravagantly out of proportion to the smallness of his bulk. His contributions to the world's list of great names in literature, science, art, music, finance, medicine, and abstruse learning are also away out of proportion to the weakness of his numbers. He has made a marvelous fight in this world, in all the ages; and had done it with his hands tied behind him. He could be vain of himself, and be excused for it. The Egyptian, the Babylonian, and the Roman followed, and made a vast noise, and they are gone. Other peoples have sprung up and held their torch high for a time, but it burned out, and they sit in twilight now, or have vanished. The Jew saw them all, beat them all, and is now what he always was, exhibiting no decadence, no infirmities of age, no weakening of his parts, no slowing of his energies, no dulling of his alert and aggressive mind. All things are mortal but the Jew; all other forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his immortality?" By: Mark Twain "Concerning The Jews," Harper's Magazine, 1898

    8. Re:I don't know why everyone make so many jokes.. by conway · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thats all very nice.
      I just wonder why you were referrning to "the jew" as "he" all the time? ... Hmmm ...
      (And female rabbis in the orthodox jewish movement!? In 10 years?!? That'd be something.)

    9. Re:I don't know why everyone make so many jokes.. by femibots-r-us · · Score: 1

      I just wonder why you were referrning to "the jew" as "he" all the time? ... Hmmm ... I wasn't, Mark Twain was. And female rabbis in the orthodox jewish movement!? In 10 years?!? That'd be something. Again, they will most likely be referred to by something other than Rabbi. Did you consult google before responded to my comments? "According to Rabbi Saul Berman of New York, one of Orthodox feminism's leading rabbinic advisers, most of the women seeking counsel from these female interpreters of Jewish law, known as yoatzot halachah, are haredi (fervently Orthodox) - the most anti-feminist Orthodox community." "Two New York City synagogues have created congregational internships, where scholarly women work as teachers of both men and women, speak from the pulpit and fulfill other duties similar to those of male seminary students who work as rabbinic interns." "Change has also been felt in Israel, where learned young women are now serving as interpreters of Jewish law in certain areas of halachic expertise." "Advances in women's participation in Orthodox life were also reflected in the four booklets put out by the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance, known as JOFA." You might be able to get more info from JOFA if you are interested in this subject.

  42. Obnoxious no, selective yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Shut the fuck up prole.

    You can join us when you're elite enough.

  43. What is this, the Masons? by weav · · Score: 1

    Once invited, do I get a cool little apron, learn the secret handshake (thumb on index finger's knuckle), and the pass-words?

    If not, I think I'll skip it...

    1. Re:What is this, the Masons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gg ignorant wanker.

      and you get a +2 for not knowing what the hell you're talking about.

    2. Re:What is this, the Masons? by op00to · · Score: 1

      Er, from what I understand, the Masons don't come to you for membership, you have to go to a Mason...

    3. Re:What is this, the Masons? by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      The FreeMasons are not allowed to invite people, it's against the rules. People have to ask to join, and be sponsored by members.

  44. Beta by funny-jack · · Score: 1

    It's probably by invitation only because it's still in beta. If you look at their homepage, next to the purpleish Orkut logo at the upper-right, it says "beta" in white letters.

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
  45. Catch 22 by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I actually had any friends, I wouldn't need a "social networking service".

    1. Re:Catch 22 by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not true.

      I had one friend on Friendster...he's a real kind of savvy guy who's totally well adjusted. Joining via him added a bunch of new contacts, some of whom I got on very well with.

      So, I join friendster with one friend, and suddenly I have ten more. I introduced a few others to my wife, who used to complain about not being able to meet people.

      Friendster is just another way to meet people you might like. It's like a digital party, only you don't have to clean vomit off your couch.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Catch 22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what? now you leave the vomit on your couch?

    3. Re:Catch 22 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital parties don't involve vomit either.

    4. Re:Catch 22 by Eminence · · Score: 1

      Well, I've just registered at Friendster and it looks like it is very hard to meet someone new unless you know anyone who is already a member. Since I don't know any such person my options are quite limited.

    5. Re:Catch 22 by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      http://www.friendster.com/join.jsp?invite=4899861

      Hey, any friend of slashdot's is a friend of mine, right?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    6. Re:Catch 22 by Eminence · · Score: 1

      Thanks! But there is another problem - since I've already joined Friendster I can't use your invitation. Seems like you can't invite someone who's already on. Let's try to find one another inside.

  46. Re:Just to let you know by reuben04 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they will complain about diseases in chat rooms regarding orkut??

  47. i want in by jimmi_bob · · Score: 1

    I mailed them and said I had no friends and will they please let me in. join me.

    --
    Take away the right to say "fuck" and you take away the right to say "fuck the government." - Lenny Bruce
    1. Re:i want in by doublem · · Score: 1

      "From : Orkut

      Dear sir,

      After looking into the data google.com has on you, we've decided that you aren't good enough for us.

      Kindly slog off."

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    2. Re:i want in by fatalist23 · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, if you want in... e-mail me with subject "orkut" and body your name. I wonder how many people will take me seriously? For what it's worth, this is me.

    3. Re:i want in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't see your profile unless also a member!

    4. Re:i want in by fatalist23 · · Score: 1

      offer closed as of now.

  48. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by ehiris · · Score: 1

    It's free

  49. MOD PARENT DOWN, GRANDPARENT UP, STORY DOWN by SirJaxalot · · Score: 0
  50. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by phutureboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Friendster has such momentum even though it is so buggy and slow. Can anyone explain why it is so popular?

    Because it has a clean, simple and intuitive user interface. It is very well designed, except for the database part :)

    All the other social networking sites are a PITA to navigate, and have really cluttered, obnoxious UIs.

  51. Not Interested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would never join a club that would have me as a member.

  52. Re:Been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0




    Who needs a "friends" website when you have glory holes?


  53. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  54. "In affiliation with Google" by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This doesn't seem as big news as it could be. It's not a major project of Google, but something one of the engineers built during company time when instructed to work on a personal project. It's not branded "Google Friends" afterall.

    1. Re:"In affiliation with Google" by FoogyFoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      yes, but it's a good thing it's not called "Google Friends".

      Can you imagine the confusion, if it were name something that would be shortened to "GFriends"?

    2. Re:"In affiliation with Google" by fastdecade · · Score: 1

      Than again, being instructed to work on a personal project seems to be the default role for googlers.

  55. Orkut membership for sale on Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just kidding! :-P

  56. bukkake? by Grimlock88 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next time someone questions the educational ability of the internet, simply respond with that one word. It is proof that we've all learned something new, which we probably never would have.

    1. Re:bukkake? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...or wanted to.

  57. Invite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone a member already? The invite-only feature is really annoying. If you are a member, please invite me.

    invite_my_lame_ass_to_orkut.10.odd1@spamgourmet. co m

    Thanks,

    NotCoolEnoughToBeInvitedByGoogle

  58. Nothing on eBay... by jea6 · · Score: 1

    So far, there's nothing on eBay. There's bound to be a sycophant out there willing to pay to join this thing.

    --

    sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
  59. Not the most fortunate name by joonasl · · Score: 5, Informative

    In finnish, the word "orkut" is the plural form of the slang word for orgasm. Gives a completely new meaning for the idea of "Orkut is an online community that connects people through a network of trusted friends."

    --
    "There is a terrorist behind every bush"
    1. Re:Not the most fortunate name by verch · · Score: 2

      Wow. Now I really want to be invited.

    2. Re:Not the most fortunate name by bgarcia · · Score: 5, Funny
      In finnish, the word "orkut" is the plural form of the slang word for orgasm. Gives a completely new meaning for the idea of "Orkut is an online community that connects people through a network of trusted friends."
      That explains the huge percentage of Finnish signing up!

      Thanks!

      - Google Orkut Development Team

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    3. Re:Not the most fortunate name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Holland everybody sees the word KUT in Otkut, it means 'vagina' in dutch

    4. Re:Not the most fortunate name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The huge percentage of Finnish signups or Fins signing up, choose either.

    5. Re:Not the most fortunate name by xxdinkxx · · Score: 1

      Actually, you are not far from the truth.
      this from netcraft :

      http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=www.or ku t.com

      OS Server Last changed IP address Netblock Owner
      Linux Orkut's Palace of Love 19-Dec-2003 66.28.250.19 Cogent Communications

    6. Re:Not the most fortunate name by kelzer · · Score: 1

      Dang it. You beat me to it. I need to spend less time working and more time on Slashdot. I could have had all that Karma!

      I was going to post this blog entry by the author of JSPWiki software.

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    7. Re:Not the most fortunate name by kelzer · · Score: 1

      I was going to post this blog entry by the author of JSPWiki software.

      OK, I guess I still posted it, didn't I? My brain's fried. THANK GOD IT'S FRIIIDAAAAYYYYEEEEEEAAAAHHHHH!!!! (Howard Dean primal scream)

      --

      ---------------------------------------------
      SERENITY NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    8. Re:Not the most fortunate name by entrager · · Score: 1

      How is an orgasm unfortunate?

    9. Re:Not the most fortunate name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good question. I think he just meant it's unfortunate for the site; think of "unsatisfied" customers who hoped they'd get some big Os logging in... :-)

    10. Re:Not the most fortunate name by bazarodin · · Score: 1

      Haha, that's really funny. Orkut Buyukokten is a Turkish name, and it should have umlaunts and what not.

      Reminds me of a story I heard--a brand of cars named "Nova" were released in Southe American--meaning "no go," they didn't sell too well!

    11. Re:Not the most fortunate name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I want to go to Finnland and try out that new word I have just learned ;))

    12. Re:Not the most fortunate name by ta_relax · · Score: 1

      Finnish and turkish belong to the same language family, so it is not a big surprise that the same word somehow exists in finnish albeit with a different meaning. Maybe the prehistoric "Orkut" was known for having a lot of fun ;)

    13. Re:Not the most fortunate name by joonasl · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I think the word actually comes from the common latin root with the english word "orgasm". The proper word is "orgasmi" and "orkku" (of which "orkut" is the plural form) is just a short slang for of that..

      (..like anyone is really intereted in the linguistic finesse of finnish slang :)

      --
      "There is a terrorist behind every bush"
    14. Re:Not the most fortunate name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finnish and Turkish do not belong to the same language family though some similarities suggest that they might have the same parent language or source language. Finnish belongs to Finno-Ugrian where as Turkish belongs to Turkish-Tataric language family.

    15. Re:Not the most fortunate name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when you hit her in the eye and she kicks your ass and takes your wallet.

    16. Re:Not the most fortunate name by iantri · · Score: 1
      Urban Legend -- snopes page.

      But honestly.. suggesting that people wouldn't buy a car named Nova because it meant "no go" is like suggesting Americans wouldn't buy an Electrolux vacuum because their slogan is/was "Nothing sucks with like an Electrolux".. kind of silly, really.

    17. Re:Not the most fortunate name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But honestly.. suggesting that people wouldn't buy a car named Nova because it meant "no go" is like suggesting Americans wouldn't buy an Electrolux vacuum because their slogan is/was "Nothing sucks with like an Electrolux".. kind of silly, really.

      No, "Nothing sucks like an Electrolux" is an intentional pun by native speakers. This is "clever."

      "No va" is supposed to be an unintentional error by foreigners. This is apathetic incompetence.

    18. Re:Not the most fortunate name by bazarodin · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks for destroying one of the pillars of my childhood!

      But I don't know--would a rose by any other name smell as sweet? would you really buy a stinkweed?

  60. Harumph! by anactofgod · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't want to be member of any network that would have me, anyway.

    ---anactofgod---

    --

    ---anactofgod---

    "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
    1. Re:Harumph! by tservo24 · · Score: 1

      Nice Woody Allen quote. I actually knew of Orkut when I was at Stanford. He's been working pretty much by himself on the software for about 3 years or so. (I joined because I know all the people at google who were the first ones to join.) (And yes, Google sounds like a great place to work.)

      But let's, be clear, at the current moment it is not Google sponsored. All the attention is pretty well overblown and based on speculation. But Orkut is still a great CS engineer and the software does have inherent value...but still I am sure he would agree he did not expect all this press attention.

    2. Re:Harumph! by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Actually, Groucho Marx said that.

    3. Re:Harumph! by shiffman · · Score: 1

      Groucho also said, when told that he couldn't use a club's swimming pool because the club was restricted, that his daughter was only half Jewish, so could she go in up to her knees?

  61. Ahhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, now I'll have to listen to even more perverse geek-speak about Google

    Geek_1: Hey man, have you googled her yet?
    Geek_2: I tell you, I googled her BIG time...
    Geek_1: Sweeeeet!

  62. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    irony ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-n, r-)
    n. pl. ironies

    1.
    1. The use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning.
    2. An expression or utterance marked by a deliberate contrast between apparent and intended meaning.
    3. A literary style employing such contrasts for humorous or rhetorical effect. See Synonyms at wit1.
    2.
    1. Incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs: "Hyde noted the irony of Ireland's copying the nation she most hated" (Richard Kain).
    2. An occurrence, result, or circumstance notable for such incongruity. See Usage Note at ironic.
    3. Dramatic irony.
    4. Socratic irony.

  63. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Can anyone explain why it is so popular?

    Cuz Friendster gets you chicks. (and that's not a joke)

  64. myspace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    myspace.com is the best. good night.

  65. Delayed /. by savagedome · · Score: 1

    Orkut.com will have a delayed /. effect. Why? 'Coz not a lot of people will try to join/access it from within their workplace (Site is blocked as in my case, not a good thing to do at workplace and all the other reasons).

  66. Join Orkut by Finuvir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love the numerous links imploring me to 'Join Orkut', only to bring up a page saying " Membership to orkut is by invitation only." It's like yelling from your doorway to 'come on in', only to ask for a ticket at the door.

    --
    Why is anything anything?
    1. Re:Join Orkut by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's classic "Come in! Now fuck off!", like all the sites that put up a splash page inviting you in and then tell you you're using the wrong web browser. I expect better from Google, frankly.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    2. Re:Join Orkut by ElliotLee · · Score: 1
      You know how they say you only love someone more when that someone remains mysterious, or even rejects you?

      It's a scheme used to make people envy membership more. It magnifies elitism and and makes you feel left out.

      And/or perhaps Google is planning to introduce open registration soon, and they want to make sure billions of people are banging on the doors when they do. So they'll get lots of credit for being nice enough to let them in.

    3. Re:Join Orkut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So they'll get lots of credit for being nice enough to let them in."

      Possibly. There are contact email addresses. One could write and say "Please invite me to join" and see what happens. Of course, if they said 'yes, you are invited' I wouldn't want to join, unless perhaps there was an option to join as an anonymous coward.

  67. Riiiight... by anactofgod · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google put up a network to compete w/ Friendster.
    Riiiiight

    Twelve thousand initial invitations went out to join.
    Riiiight

    Only members can invite new members.
    Riiiight

    This is the BEST vaporware campaign EVER!

    ---anactofgod---

    --

    ---anactofgod---

    "Equal opportunity swindling - *that* is the true test of a sustainable democracy."
    1. Re:Riiiight... by DaoudaW · · Score: 1

      This is the BEST vaporware campaign EVER!

      Google doesn't do vaporware! Their betas are better than most company's releases.

      Besides, twelve thousand is a really large number to start with when you're expecting (for a few generations anyway) exponential growth. I wish we knew more about how they selected the twelve thousand. Probably a few turkeys in the lot already...

    2. Re:Riiiight... by jred · · Score: 1

      Hey, your "i" key is sticking...

      Sorry, I couldn't resist :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  68. Invite only? by clckwrkMalChick · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel like the fat kid who always got picked last for dodgeball. Wait, I am the fat kid that always got picked last for dodgeball. Somehow this hurts slightly more.

    --

    -=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-
    What would Yossarian do?
    1. Re:Invite only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clockwork Boy? Is that you?

    2. Re:Invite only? by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      Hey, long time no see Fat Kid Who Always Got Picked Last For Dodgeball!!! It's me, Skinny Kid Who Always Got Picked Right Before The Fat Kid Who Always Got Picked Last For Dodgeball!! Thanks to you I got to be on the good team.

    3. Re:Invite only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo tubs how's it hanging?

    4. Re:Invite only? by imr · · Score: 1

      Hi, i'm the guy who always got beaten up trying to protect the fat kid from being beaten up.
      If I was a member, I would invite you. Of course, I'm not.
      It hurts too.

    5. Re:Invite only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the one who always picked on you fat, skinny, ugly kids, or whatever you felt you were. How about like me, getting over the fact of being so fucking superficial and gaining some confidence in yourself.

      It's as if you LIKE to play victims, and always WANT to be one step behind. It's your own choice.

      I'llKickYourTeethIn, one step ahead AGAIN, BEAT ME, PLEASE, I'm so fucking tired of being ahead all the time. And just so that you get the point that I'm ahead, let me explain that I am contradicting myself, its on purpose, its SARCASM!

      Fucking loosers.

  69. Sounds like the Stonecutters ... by gubachwa · · Score: 2, Funny
    First thing this reminded me of was the Simpsons' episode where Homer became a member of the Stonecutters ...

    Who controls the British crown?
    Who keeps the metric system down?
    We do! We do!
    Who leaves Atlantis off the maps?
    Who keeps the martians under wraps?
    We do! We do!
    Who holds back the electric car?
    Who makes Steve Guttenberg a star?
    We do! We do!
    Who robs the cave fish of their sight?
    Who rigs every Oscars night?
    We do! We do!

    Yeah. I really want to be part of Orkut. Please, someone invite me. Not.

  70. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    The answer lies in its alternate name, which they should have just gone ahead and used: "Fuckster". Like hotornot, it's where you go to get laid if you don't have sufficient social skills to do so through face to face interaction.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  71. You broke rule 1. by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

    The first rule of Orkut club is you don't talk about Orkut club.

  72. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Tassach · · Score: 1
    It is very well designed, except for the database part
    That's what happens when you let UI weenies design a system. Good systems architects design go back-to-front, not font-to-back. The UI should be the last thing you design.
    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  73. Don't knock it... by gumpish · · Score: 1

    An invitation-only society will always become cannabalistic and/or inbred.

    Inbreeding beats the hell out of no breeding...

  74. Google DOES NOT own the domain... by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Registrant:
    BUYUKKOKTEN, ORKUT (UHGFNCTSOD)
    2400 W El Camino Real, Apt 419
    MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040-1680
    US

    Domain Name: ORKUT.COM

    Administrative Contact:
    BUYUKKOKTEN, ORKUT (OBD36) orkut@cs.stanford.edu
    2400 W El Camino Real, Apt 419
    MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94040-1680
    US
    650 888 5822 fax: 123 123 1234

    Technical Contact:
    Network Solutions, Inc. (HOST-ORG) customerservice@networksolutions.com
    13200 Woodland Park Drive
    Herndon, VA 20171-3025
    US
    1-888-642-9675 fax: 571-434-4620

    Record expires on 08-Dec-2006.
    Record created on 08-Dec-2002.
    Database last updated on 23-Jan-2004 15:09:01 EST.

    Domain servers in listed order:

    NS11.WORLDNIC.COM 216.168.225.141
    NS12.WORLDNIC.COM 216.168.225.142
    1. Re:Google DOES NOT own the domain... by Greg+Lindahl · · Score: 1


      Bad taste in apartments -- that building is WAAAAY overpriced.

  75. Scalability vs. exclusivity by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A social network's attempts at exclusivity would seem to be at odds with scalability. Once the network exceeds some threshold then it is bound to contain mutually distrusted people connected by chain of trust. The problem is that trust is not fully transitive -- it is not true that if A trusts B and B trusts C, then A trusts C.

    A more scalable approach would allow open enrollment and self-organizing clusters. Each joiner would become trusted within one or more loosely defined clusters of BOFs, while remaining untrusted or disliked by other BOFs. At a higher level, BOFs could even assign trust to other BOFs, with members partially inheriting the relative trust levels of the BOF(s) they belong to.

    Membership-by-invitation creates an unfortunate hurdle to creating truely globe-spanning networks because it means you have to know someone to be permitted to know someone. Although intended to weed out the riff-raff, invitation-only policies probably do more to create obstacles for legitimate, but previously socially unconnected, potential members. A better post-joining filtration/sortation/cluster would let everyone find their respective community(s).

    A truely scalable social network would admit and support gun-toting republicans, and enviro-liberal democrats, and Microsoft apologists, and Apple fanboys. A set of trust distance functions would ensure that each member stays within their respective BOF clusters.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Scalability vs. exclusivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, we should just stick to real life.

    2. Re:Scalability vs. exclusivity by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      One thing that was slightly big for some inexplicable reason a few years ago was fuzzy logic. Basically instead of true or false you'd have a real number between 0 and 1 (or -1 and 1). This sounds like an excellent application.

      To model reality, I think you'd need two weights: trustworthiness and naivete (sp?). You need to be able to say "I trust X about 80%, but I trust their opinion of others only about 60%." Then to get the trustworthiness of someone once removed, you multiply the two corresponding values. (and maybe take the maximum of conflicting values)

      So if you trust X's opinions by 90% and X trusts Y to 90%, you would be assumed to trust Y to 81%.

      Say you have a friend B who's very trustworthy, but way too trusting of other people, so you only trust their opinion to 20%. If they trust C to 90%, the system would only assume that you trust C to 18% (failing any other indications).

    3. Re:Scalability vs. exclusivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it that is the point though. By having it invitation only the network has the information who trusts whomn and therefore can incorporate a sort of locality, and cluster dervelopment.

      Another comment, I am part of some sheltered (as in obscure and not subject to "beyond critical mass for idiots to appear" exposure) and other hyped/open/obvious online communities, and I find the notion expressed almost automatically here, that all online social networks are just for people who "have no life" irritating.
      Most of the people on those kind of communities do have a life, and the internet is just a healthy part of it.

  76. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Echnin · · Score: 1

    The use of irony in this context conforms to 2:1. You wouldn't expect MSN to start advertising for Mandrake, would you?

    --
    Lalala
  77. SocNets we'd like to see by theCat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mobster: you must be a member of a gang or Mafia. To get in, you need to have a rap sheet with at least 20 entries. First 12,000 invites went to email addresses in Federal prisons.

    Witchster: you must be an initiate into witchcraft. To get in you need to have posted at least one spell of your own creation, with details on the underlying operation principles. First 12,000 invites went to the High Priest/Priestesses of covens registered as nonprofits.

    Govster: you must be a politician who is, or recently was, running for any public office in the United States of America. To get in you must have a public web site that contains the slogan "Vote for America! Vote for me!". First 12,000 invites went to the list of people who ran for Governor of California in the latest state election.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    1. Re:SocNets we'd like to see by phluxoahu · · Score: 1

      Id rather see a fuckSter where you are only connected to people with whom you've had sex with. That'd be the most useful least likely to have the real data site ever..

      --
      Only take advice from somebody who is where you want to be.
    2. Re:SocNets we'd like to see by tobes · · Score: 1

      I thought about calling my site mobster but decided against it. Even as a name for a client app, it's just a bit too much.

    3. Re:SocNets we'd like to see by Deslack · · Score: 0
      Id rather see a fuckSter where you are only connected to people with whom you've had sex with. That'd be the most useful least likely to have the real data site ever..
      Yeah, wait till they bug you with "I'm pregnant with your baby" messages several times a day.
      --
      .sigs are useless; it doesn't protect you from imposters.
    4. Re:SocNets we'd like to see by paulgrant · · Score: 1

      1 more to go.
      AHHAHAHAHAHA
      sorry.

  78. I'm not invited!? by SpongeMatt · · Score: 1

    I'm not invited!? Well, I just start my own social network and it'll be REALLY cool and it'll be better than yours! And you can't join. So there!

    OH Goody- holographic meatloaf again.

  79. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by doublem · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because most the people on Friendster are polly or sexually lose?

    Because once on there are women who troll for "friends of friends" to bang?

    Because most those women are computer Geeks who like "Geek pillow talk?"

    Because most the female pics are very pretty???

    Any of that explain it???

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  80. Don't you get it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With so many other networks available people won't join yet another one. However, if you make it real hard to get in, people will do anything you say to become a member. Forbidden fruit is always the most attractive of all. It's human nature and they're trying to use it to their advantage.

    1. Re:Don't you get it? by PsionicMan · · Score: 1

      It's like that one Mission Hill where they start a club that doesn't exist and let nobody in and it becomes insanely popular.

      --

  81. Spam filter..... by master_xemu · · Score: 1

    Course when you realize that 11,900 of the invitations were filtered as spam or junkmail and the only about 1 percent of the people who received will actually join........hope you are friends with Steve Goobie ;-)

  82. I left... by eurleif · · Score: 1

    The second I saw the annoying fade-in text effect. Google is nice because it's simple. No animations, no JS, and no fade-in text. This site doesn't seem to be much in the spirit of Google, no matter who runs it.

  83. How to join by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

    So I send an email to the feedback and help address. The feedback autoresponse basically says we might read your email but we won't respond. Still waiting for an answer from help. I will post here when I get it.

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    1. Re:How to join by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      Don't know if anybody cares but I just got this today.

      Thanks for your interest in orkut.com. The orkut user base began with its creator Orkut Buyukkokten, who invited his friends to join. They in turn invited their friends, and soon the network was born.

      In order to keep orkut a trusted community, you must be invited by a current member. Over the next few weeks, we hope that this community grows to a point where everyone who wants to join has the opportunity.

      Keep checking with your friends. There may be an orkut member lurking among you.

      Stay connected,
      orkut.com

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  84. EBay auctions by Scottm87 · · Score: 1

    I cant wait to see the insane auctions for "an invitation". "Trust" in the community will be going to the highest bidder...

  85. Free invitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll invite you if you can say Orkut Buyukkokten, 10 times, fast

    1. Re:Free invitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Orkut Buyukkokten, ten times, fast"



      Pronouncing the italics was the hard part

  86. Let them have their stupid club by dfn5 · · Score: 1

    Won't invite me, will they? Well, screw them. I'll just start my own club. And I'll invite nobody. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:Let them have their stupid club by micq · · Score: 1

      I'll just start my own club. And I'll invite nobody. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      And yet another club that I'll never get to be a member of...

      woe is me.

  87. GHEY TO THE MAX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fucking geek social clubs... LOL
    more like pretentions bloggers who like to think they're "in" with the google-set, who btw are becoming more and more irrelevant nowadays.
    I for one can't wait until a new capable search engine comes along and takes google down a notch.

  88. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by BitchAss · · Score: 1

    So, I'm running a site for free - Indecent Blogging and I'd love it to get to the size of Friendster. It's completely free and even ad free for now, but it seems to have hit a wall, so that doesn't really explain it. IB is about sex...and sex sells - so, what am I missing?

    I've noticed a few things that need to be added - a better profile page, a way for users to communicate (email?) - I want to grow the community. Any suggestions? (your site sucks now withstanding)

    --
    Like sex? Read and write about it! Indecent Blogging
  89. Internet hookups through friends!? by efflux · · Score: 1
    personally, if I were to try to hookup with someone, I wouldn't want my *friends* to know about it. It very well may be something I would be hearing about for quite some time. This is the advantage of *actual physical* proximity. You can test out someone's reaction to you *without seeming to*. This, I believe, will be the primary barrier in the widespread adoption of these services.

    That said, that doesn't mean that unexpected uses of these services won't develop. I just don't see it as a dating tool (which seems to be the slant on this).

    --
    Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
  90. Any group that won't have me as a memeber... by MagikSlinger · · Score: 1

    is a group I want to join!!! :-)

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  91. Go home, Sam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're dead.

  92. The Eric Cartman business model by The+I+Shing · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's the Eric Cartman business model... we've built this really great thing and YOU CAN'T USE IT!

    People will be clamoring to try and get access to this thing only because they're being told they can't have it.

    What a great country!

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  93. Orkutian Recursion??? by oddwick11 · · Score: 1

    Orkut helped make it, it was named after him, and now he is a member (presumably). Kinda smacks of recursion, or incest.

    Oh, and someone invite me.

    2Lame2BeInvitedByGoogle.20.odd1@spamgourmet.com

    Thanks kids

  94. tribes by lavaface · · Score: 1

    I've found tribe.net to be a smoother alternative to Friendster. Hell they even have a "tribe" devoted to friendster-hating! Oh, and they also do ads by google.

    1. Re:tribes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's still just a bunch of sycophant poly-oriented sluts and assholes. STDs galore. Just under a different domain.

  95. Interesting by roomisigloomis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People tend to form groups with those who are like them in some way. If they sent random invitations and these receivers invite their friends to join, we might have a very interesting simulation. For example, we can surmise that everyone who joins is computer literate. Other than that, it's all up in the air. Therefore, as people invite other who are probably like themselves (friends tend to be that way), we may end up with a very large and fairly good sample of Netizens. This, in turn, would be very useful for market research which, as we all know, can fetch a pretty hefty price on the open market. Therefore: no fees to join, no fees to maintain membership...just fill out a survey for us every once in a while. We don't even really need your e-mail address...just fill out the survey. Call me strange but I think I could have been sitting on a pile of money if I would have implemented this first. I mean, people always want to join what you don't want them to join.

    --
    "We are accountable for not only what we do, but also that which we don't do." -- Moliere
  96. Quit Now And Show Them Snobs Whatfor by geomon · · Score: 1

    The terms and conditions (aka, terms of service) state that you can quit orkut at any time, for any reason just by emailing admin@orkut.com.

    Show 'em who's boss: Quit before you're invited!

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
  97. Cartman's Amusment Park by Ugmo · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the South Park episode where Cartman buys a failed amusement park and doesn't let anyone else in.

    Soon everyone wants in, mostly because Cartman keeps telling everyone they can't get in.

    He slowly has to let people in to get money to maintain it. Once all the people get in Cartman hates the place and sells it.

  98. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by elohim · · Score: 1

    what you might be missing is a way to search for people based on zipcode, and a way to message people internally. friendster is like match.com, except free. that's why it's so popular.

  99. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you missing?...
    People who have sex?
    Pick-up guidelines for people who don't get any? Maybe that'll snag you some more users.

  100. sex is an activity, isn't it? by British · · Score: 1

    Friendster was cool for about a month, then it was realized their webservers are now 10 times slower than Slashdot.

    Myspace, being almost the same as friendster sudenly became popular, while their downtime was significantly less than Friendster's.

    My question is once you setup your cliques of friends, then what? Their journaling feature seems to be widely unused, and, uh, all the attractive women on there are "in a relationship"

    1. Re:sex is an activity, isn't it? by Deslack · · Score: 0
      all the attractive women on there are "in a relationship"

      Yeah, so that they could keep themselves off buggers like you.
      --
      .sigs are useless; it doesn't protect you from imposters.
  101. Orkut invites selling on ebay? by Ravioli · · Score: 1

    How much longer will it be before orkut invites go up on ebay?

    --
    I am too lame to make a .signature!
  102. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by BitchAss · · Score: 1

    That's a good idea. I was already thinking of a dating service or more appropriatly something similar to Adult Friend Finder.

    --
    Like sex? Read and write about it! Indecent Blogging
  103. They should call this WHOogle by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm surprised that Google doesn't create more plays on its own name for various functions. Besides the Froogle shopping site that could have:

    Whoogle -- social networks
    Oogle -- porn
    Doogle -- jobs
    Zoogle -- info on animals
    Choogle -- food, recipes, and restaurants

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:They should call this WHOogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oogle-Zoogle beastiality

    2. Re:They should call this WHOogle by iamsure · · Score: 1

      Wow! Another 2NU fan! Nice SIG!

      I'm calling Clive Dinkey's..

    3. Re:They should call this WHOogle by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Google -- for goatse.cx

      No wait...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:They should call this WHOogle by radish · · Score: 1

      Well, one of them is almost a reality. Check out booble.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:They should call this WHOogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard somebody has made booble.com for searching porn

    6. Re:They should call this WHOogle by A+Masquerade · · Score: 1

      And you can't forget Booble .

    7. Re:They should call this WHOogle by Spectre · · Score: 1

      Have you checked out Booble?

      --
      "Flame away, I wear asbestos underwear"
    8. Re:They should call this WHOogle by punxking · · Score: 0

      Google -- for goatse.cx

      Actually I believe that would be "eeew-gle".

      --
      You can have my cynical agnosticism when you pry it from my cold, dead logic.
    9. Re:They should call this WHOogle by dysjunct · · Score: 1

      Well, there is the complete H.P. Lovecraft search engine:

      http://www.cthuugle.com :)

    10. Re:They should call this WHOogle by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      OK, then, why not:

      Koogle -- obscure peanut butter spreads
      (Barney) Google -- search for obscure cartoon characters
      Bloogle -- Google Blogs
      Farfagnoogle -- german words used in American Advertising to "emote" good engineering viv-a-vis aautomobiles

    11. Re:They should call this WHOogle by paulgrant · · Score: 1

      Acctually, someones done a search-enginer for porn, called "Booble" :)

    12. Re:They should call this WHOogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget,

      kgoogle - google reimplemented using KDE
      cuckoogle - helps you find the right mental institution to check into
      suegle - helps you find a good lawyer
      loogle - Search for Microsoft products and other toiletries
      moogle - search for that perfect mad cow
      cluegle - for people who don't have a clue, here's where you find one

    13. Re:They should call this WHOogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Careful with the "I'm feeling cheap" option, it seemed to have a ton of gay sites listed. Maybe it should be called "Dongle" instead.

  104. Club Nexis by darksmurf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Orkut Buyukkokten has done this before.

  105. ALSO, BUY ME A PONY. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    As long as we're making arbitrary demands...

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:ALSO, BUY ME A PONY. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ponies. What are they all about?

      Are they good, or are they whack?

  106. where'd they get 12,000 e-mail addresses? by jdunlevy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seems like a lot of addresses. How were they gathered?

    Doesn't look like orkut.com had a sign-up period or anything...

    Doesn't look like it was sent to Google-Friends Newsletter (not in the archive; plus RTFA, in which says "Google spokeswoman Eileen Rodriquez said that despite Orkut's affiliation, the service is not part of Google's product portfolio at this time.")

  107. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by elohim · · Score: 1

    if you charge for it, it's doa. other pay services have taken off, there isn't room for any more. friendster is a bait and switch. they plan on charging for the service in the future.

  108. The first rule about Orkut... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is we don't talk about stupid the name sounds.

  109. So if I don't get one... by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

    If I don't get an invitation, does this disprove the Six Degrees theory or just prove that I need to get out more?

  110. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Rufus211 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think you are confusing balding 40-year old men who pretend to be teenage girls online with actual women.

    Or maybe I'm confusing AOL chat rooms with friendster.

  111. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  112. Google? by superfast-scooter · · Score: 1

    do we need a Ph.D to get in? :P

  113. How to Win Friends... by al!ethel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only question I have is, how are you supposed to "meet new people" or "expand your social structure" if all you are doing is inviting all the people you already know. From what I have seen, most people have a fairly static social circle, and there is not much movement between them.

    --
    If I could get a firm grip on reality, I'd choke it...
  114. Hatester! by General+Alcazar · · Score: 1

    Fcuk all that - join Hatester. You know that is why you join - so you can flame - so why not just admit it? Hatester is inevitable. Hatester is the future!

  115. very slow? by kaan · · Score: 1

    It can be _very slow_ sometimes...

    I can't even log in to Friendster, let alone get to a point where I can get a warning that my network can't be accessed, etc.. I just tried again yesterday, and got the usual 60 second browser timeout after hitting the "login" button.

    I totally agree that it's too bad for Friendster, because they sure as shit could have used a boost in performance.

    1. Re:very slow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the problems with Friendster is that it got too popular for the architecture. if any social networking site went from 1 to 5 million registered users in 1 year, they'd have the same issues.

  116. Who sends the invitations? by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

    Everybody here seems to assume that any Orkut member has the ability to create other Orkut members (by invitation), but neither the CNN story nor the Orkut website itself supports that assumption.

    Many here have issued blanket condemnations of this scheme, based on the idea that a few members could ruin the system by inviting undesirables into the elite club.

    If somebody here knows authoritatively what system Orkut is using, would they please speak up?

    On the other hand, what system WOULD work the best?

    • Approval voting?
    • Let each member sell their membership to the highest bidder?
    • Something else?
    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
    1. Re:Who sends the invitations? by fatalist23 · · Score: 1

      As a member (heh) I can say that all you need to generate Orkut invites is a first and last name, and the e-mail address of another individual. Orkut of course doesn't really check first or last name, so all you really need is the e-mail address. There doesn't seem to be a limit on the number of invites one can generate, either, although I myself have only generated 17 invites.

      If you're interested in an invite yourself, mail me. Subject "orkut", and give me some sort of first and last name. The invite will be to whatever address you mail me from.

    2. Re:Who sends the invitations? by fatalist23 · · Score: 1

      offer closed as now.

  117. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

    Nah, Friendster has real chicks on it. That's the whole value of the friend-of-a-friend concept - you can be pretty sure that unless your friends are some real sick fucks, the 20 year old women they vouch for aren't actually balding 40 year old men.

  118. Re:Okrut, whites only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Minorities already can join the GNAA.

  119. Online social engineering by geekwench · · Score: 1
    Okay, I'm of a divided mind on this one.
    I'm a user of the meetup.com service, and I'm fairly happy with it. Find an interest, go to your local area's page for said interest, sign up, vote on a place to get together; and once a month, you have the opportunity to have coffee (or whatever) with like-minded folks.
    It's pretty simple, but the key factor is that there's an expectation that you'll be meeting people in a group, and in a fairly public place. Safety issues are thusly taken into consideration, and you get to meet people whom you might otherwise never run into.

    Friendster, and all of the others, provide a service: facilitating introductions between people who might not be the most socially graceful. The cliche of the pasty-faced computer geek who has every IM service known to man, and several dozen contacts on each, but can't make eye contact with someone of the opposite gender to save their life, has become a cliche because there's at least a grain of truth to it. Online introduction services take some of the anxiety out of the process. However, as you might expect, people who are socially awkward don't always take safety concerns into consideration, which is why I would prefer to see more emphasis on group activities.

    Now, having said that, I have people who I consider to be good friends on my ICQ contact list, who I have never met (much as I might like to.) But, for every person who makes the grade, there are at least 50 who I would have been perfectly happy had they never stumbled across my profile. At least the "ignore" button takes care of them.

    --
    Doing my level best to piss off the religious right wing...
  120. Re:Sad News Captain Kangaroo, dead at 76 by airrage · · Score: 1

    * Hopefully he was on God's buddy list.
    * Did he get the Heavenster invite?
    * Was he 6 degrees from StPeter@PearlyGates.com?
    * Was he listed in the master directory?
    * He's taken the big ping-pong ball drop in the sky!
    * He's put on the red sweater of eternity!
    * His next gig will be at WGod and paid in part by the corporation for public broadcasting!
    * He got his bowl-cut for the last time!

    Oh what am I talking about?

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
  121. The TOS by b.thompson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Take a look at their TOS before posting anything of any importance to you.

    orkut.com's proprietary rights
    By submitting, posting or displaying any Materials on or through the orkut.com service, you automatically grant to us a worldwide, non-exclusive, sublicenseable, transferable, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right to copy, distribute, create derivative works of, publicly perform and display such Materials


    Emphasis added by me.

    1. Re:The TOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your point is? They need that to legally display what you've posted!

    2. Re:The TOS by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      yeah, only orkut and about a million other companies have that standard boilerplate legal text. Jeez, even googling for the exact phrase "worldwide, non-exclusive, sublicenseable" gives you about 100 results.

      If you're keeping some big trade secret, don't post it there - otherwise honestly, who's going to give a fuck about your chatter?

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  122. Why on earth would you need an invitation by Alien+Conspiracy · · Score: 1

    I don't see the need for invitation-only sites

    What is the benefit of this?

  123. tribe by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    I'm going to start a "I Hate Orkut" tribe at tribe.net

    1. Re:tribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that is the best reason I have heard yet to join tribe

    2. Re:tribe by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      there s already a friendster-hater tribe :P

      friendstersucks.tribe.net

  124. Six Degrees all over again? by dethface · · Score: 1

    Six Degrees did this stuff years ago and went belly up. What's the big deal?

  125. MY LITTLE PONY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TDK

  126. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by ichimunki · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never thought I'd say this on Slashdot, but it's "loose" not "lose"!

    --
    I do not have a signature
  127. Unfortunetly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most of them got deleted as SPAM.

  128. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe you are confusing yourself with a heterosexual?

  129. Screw orkut, join Enemyster! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.enemyster.com

  130. I'll start my own ... by FSK · · Score: 1

    If I can't get in I'll start my own friends network, but with gambling and hookers!!!

    --
    When punk rock is outlawed, only outlaws will have punk rock.
  131. WRONG... by Dave21212 · · Score: 1


    The are only selling 1/3 of the interest in the company... a hostile takeover is not possible !

    See Also (Jan 6): "About a third of Mountain View, Calif.-based Google may be sold in the IPO, giving the company a market value of about $12 billion, the bankers said. The company will probably register the shares for sale with the Securities and Exchange Commission this month and sell them by April, the bankers said. "

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  132. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by doublem · · Score: 1

    You're confusing AOL cat rooms with Friendster. It's a common mistake.

    Mind you, I wouldn't want to venture too far from my existing list of friends if I was cruising Friendster for some action. Two or Three degrees away and you can be pretty sure of the accuracy of the person's profile. Finding someone randomly on the other hand...

    I don't use it for that purpose myself, as I'm happily engaged, but I am acquaintances with some very, ehrm, active and proud of it women on the site.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  133. Maybe you don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    ...what a circle jerk really is.

    There is no "bitch" in the middle. It's just a circle of men, each of them reaching into the lap of the guy to their right, stoking his neighbor's meat.

    Try to learn the terminology before attempting to use it in a sentence.

  134. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

    since when can you get laid on hotornot?

    AFAICT, the best way to get laid is to hang out on everything2.com

  135. Hacked Links by GlobalCombatDotCom · · Score: 1

    There is tonz more info at http://help.orkut.com/ Here are some links from when you are logged in. They redirect to the home page if your not. http://www.orkut.com/Friends.aspx http://www.orkut.com/Communities.aspx http://www.orkut.com/Search.aspx http://help.orkut.com/ http://www.orkut.com/Logout.aspx

    --
    Bryan

    CT

  136. A far simpler way to get friends online by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

    1: Open ICQ.
    2: Either use Random Chat, put some fun criteria into Find User or add 251696825 (me).

    Let the good times roll.

    Quite why we need all of this bullshit about having to be asked to join is lost in the mists of time.

  137. Invite Me, please! by killmeplease · · Score: 1

    I want to join, please invite me.

    My name is
    Dusty

    My email is:
    dustylloyd@cox.net

    --
    - Kill Yourself, spare us all! -
    1. Re:Invite Me, please! by rtconner · · Score: 1

      such shameful begging

      i hope the bots find your email address and you get spammed for the rest of all eternity.

      --
      023AD01("Child", "Evil");
  138. How bout the Netherlands ? by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 0
    in dutch, Orkut pronounces as 'ear-cunt'...

    Hmmmm...

  139. Re:Hey, Linux professionals by Sir+Haxa1ot · · Score: 0

    Buy? The open source guy who cleans floors around here said it would be free.

  140. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Alien+Conspiracy · · Score: 1
    Not all of them. sudonames.com has a very clean UI.

    OTOH it is even more exclusive than Orkut: although you can open an account, there is _no_ inbuilt invitation system for establishing friend links, nor any 'search' function to find other users etc...

  141. Not for Finnish people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orkut means in Finnish language multiple orgasm.

  142. deja vu by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think there is only a finite number of people interested in social networking sites like Orkut, Friendster, Tribe, etc.

    Given the proven theory of 6 degrees of separation, it shouldnt take very long for all possible connections to be made before the growth reaches a plateau.

    Eventually, everyone on each social network will want to have the most connections and will also get an account at all the other social networks.

    I've seen this happen in online dating websites that offer "free" accounts.

    I've browsed all the online websites that have a sizeable number of people in my city, and 90% of all the women with a free account are the same women across all those sites.

  143. Google Buddies by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    I dunno, "Buyukkokten" sounds too much like "buy you out then" if I phonetically word it out and assume a few mispellings. Is Piping Design Central still #1 at Google? I shudder to think if I've innocently offended the Google overlords with this post.

  144. The point by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You could see how they branch, what countries they cross into, and how people relate to each other (interests, age, etc.)

    I would go so far as to say that's the whole point. They're probably doing this to analyze statistically how such networking takes place. This would be useful as a model for many things, and I'm sure marketers would be interested if no one else.

    Information transfer theory is cool, and no one has the possibility to study it like Google does.

  145. Someone want to invite me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. We don't want any left wing nuts over here.
    Sorry, nothing personal.

  146. Re: privacy and spam by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    There's a contradiction between what their help page says about email addresses:
    What is your spam policy?

    We do not collect, track, nor distribute email addresses, IP addresses, or other personally identifying information. We request your email address in the registration process so that we can validate your identity and can contact you regarding your account.

    ... and what their privacy page says:
    information we collect

    When you register to become a member of orkut.com, we collect your name, email address and other personal identifying information that you submit to the site.

    how we use your information

    We use your name and email address to notify you of new members, messages or other information, such as an invitation to join a friend's network; a new testimonial or "fan" rating; crush notices, etc. In addition, we will send you messages when there are substantive changes to the service or our policies. All of these messages can be sent to your primary email address or to your orkut.com inbox by setting your preferences on the "my settings" page.

    We may share information that you submit and any non-personally identifiable information we collect with Google, Inc. and agents of orkut in accordance to the terms and conditions of this Privacy Policy.

    So on the one hand, they don't collect email addresses. On the other hand, they do. So, which is it?

  147. I AM TOO HARD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did you know my cat's name?

  148. Slashster by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay everyone, shameless plug time.

    I am currently creating a PHP version of friendster which I call Slashster. (Yes, this is inspired from Slashdot and Friendster).

    I figured that a PHP/mysql implementation would be interesting, and I'm rather curious to see how this thing can end up scaling, and if it can do it well.

    I was thinking of launching this on Monday, but this slashdot story was too relevant for me to wait on it, and get some of the press on it.

    Right now, its layout is nearly identical to friendster, but will change once I actually get someone with design skill to help me redo it.

    There are a couple primary differences between slashster and friendster so far:

    • Slashster has a messageboard. You can only see threads / post from people two degrees of separation or less from you (You, your friends, their friends). Friendster kind of had a "post-it" system on their site, which didn't have any sort of interaction on it. This aims to be a little better.
    • News feeds. I'm still working on getting the XML parser working better, but I have a couple news feeds on the "main page" which are pretty much customizable.
    • Moderation: Right now, people who submit new threads to the messageboard have control on moderating people up / down on those posts. The way I figure, people who want to talk about one thing will have their own corner. People who want to be irrelevant and stupid will have another corner.
    • Karma. Your karma is (roughly) the sum of your moderations (slashdot style) divided by the number of days you've been on the site. This way, it'll encourage people to be there on a daily basis and contribute. Also, the amount of space you get for uploading pictures depends on your karma.
    • Referrals: You end up getting more picture space for the Karma of your friends. Hopefully this will encourage people to invite others who participate, and not those who do nothing.

    I'm very interested in getting input on the place. I'm still doing bugfixes on the site, as I said before, so people visiting might get the occasional parse error or two while I'm updating things.

    Still, I'm looking forward to any feedback (positive and negative) on this place. I'm really hoping this post gets modded up, simply so that more people will check it out.

    You can email me at the address listed with this user account. Thanks everyone.

    --Mark

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Slashster by Eminence · · Score: 1

      Great, but I tried to register at your site. However, the system insist that I should enter my dating preferences ("Error: Please enter your dating / relationship gender interest") - but I don't want to date anyone. I thought this is about friends, not a dating site - is this an error or you did that on purpose?

    2. Re:Slashster by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1

      Whoops.

      I got that from my friends as a comment. "We don't want to date anyone, why would it ask my preference?

      The thing is that if you don't want to date anyone, or have a relationship, it won't show up on any of the pages as you wanting to date someone.

      In any case, I'll fix that so that it doesn't require it of you. Try again in about an hour.

      Thanks for showing interest, though!

      --Mark

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    3. Re:Slashster by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      Okay, disregard my other comment. I fixed it so that it won't ask for gender preference on dating / relationship / netbuddy / friends if you don't have them checked.

      If there's anything else, feel free to email me.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    4. Re:Slashster by argent · · Score: 1

      What a mainstream set of options. Where's the options for "creating stuff with... (men, women)" and other slashworthy activities? :)

    5. Re:Slashster by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, but looking at goatse pictures and trolling on about BSD being dead doesn't count as slashworthy :)

      *laughs*

      Seriously, there'll be more options in the future. First things first I wanted most of the implementation out of the way. Hehe.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    6. Re:Slashster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, that avatar of you flicking people off as sure is going to impress the masses!

    7. Re:Slashster by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      Haha... Good point.

      Well, that's changed now. Thanks.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    8. Re:Slashster by argent · · Score: 1

      OK, make that "men / women / afraid to speculate which".

    9. Re:Slashster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you realize that signing up for Yet Another Website is a pain in the ass enough without also not being able to peek inside as a guest or take a tour.

    10. Re:Slashster by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      Actually that's a good idea. When most of the site is implemented the way I'd like it to be, I think I'll make a tour page.

      Thank you Anonymous Coward.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  149. Orkut Research Paper by davebrot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Looks like Orkut has been thinking about this for a while. Here's a paper he published with two HP Labs folks on the subject. Funny excerpt: "They (english majors) were also twice as likely to describe themselves as sexy (18 percent), while on the other hand, only 3 of the 136 Electrical Engineering majors chose to describe themselves in that way."

  150. "join now" by snellgrove2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    and the point of the join button is...to take you to a "no, you cant join actually.." page weird

  151. Google's going to go rotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being greedy and going public will do to google what it does to everyone else: it will turn them rotten. They will have to continually 'innovate' ways to reassure investors that their share values are justified. Mathematically impossible year-over-year growth rate predictions will be made by pin-striped TV boy. The profit motive will trump ethics, and google will turn gross.

    I'm going to start playing with the alternatives immediately.

  152. They seem to ban sad people by etwist · · Score: 1
    ...judging by the pictures you have to apply with a spectacular grin on your face. As to the "invitation only" access, I think it's not different from giving a party and saying "bring some people along", except at the same time you make a campaign telling other people how much they are missing.

    So I'm not against "invitation only" but I think the website somehow defeats the purpose (or the purpose escapes me).

    BTW I made a telling typo. Surfed to www.orkus.com, "Orkus" being the old Roman land of the dead (German spelling).

  153. What is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I missing something? I followed the link to this new site, and all it sais is "invitation only" and "social network experiment". This means nothing to me. Why was this posted? are all the other slashdotters invitied already? Did I miss a link? Is this software? is it an email account? what in the world is this thing? The concept of social networks sounds intersting, but how is this one implemented? how is it used? In short: this looks more like buzzword for nerds instead of news...

  154. Invitation only? by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Can someone invite me to the party?

    I think the mailman lost my invitation.

  155. Dear Orkut by Letter · · Score: 0, Funny
    Dear Orkut,

    I saw on your web page the offer to "expand the circumference of your social circle." That's great and all, but can you help expand the circumference of my little Urkel?

    thanks!
    Jaleel White

  156. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CUworld.com lets you search for people by location, etc.

    It has the ability to message people.

    It has various levels of membership, one of which is free.

    And you can actually SEE the video and HEAR the people that you are hanging out with.

  157. Not really google. by Urthpaw · · Score: 1

    Orkut doesn't really appear to be run by Google. Apart from the un-Googlesque design, and lack of interlinkage between the two sites, Orkut appears to be hosted (run a traceroute) by downloadtech.net , whereas google is self-hosted.

    Also, the domain is registered to Orkut Buyukkokten, rather than Google Inc. (where both Google and its spinoff sites (froogle) are registereD), with an administrative e-mail contact at Stanford, and a mailing address in an apartment complex in Mountain View.

  158. The first rule of Orkut is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you do not talk about Orkut.

  159. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by eples · · Score: 1

    active and proud of it women

    Can I ask a dumb question? Why are they proud of it? What makes doing a bunch of guys at 3 degrees any different than just doing a bunch of random guys?

    What is the rationale here? "If I bang 12 guys at 3 degrees I am proud, but if I bang 12 guys at 5 degrees I'd be a slut!"
    I'm not a bible thumper or anything, but let's be honest here. This tool is only helping them increase the quality/quantity of their slutty encounters.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  160. Ahh Google, the one place we cant /. by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

    Ahh, google. The one place we cant slashdot

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  161. Interesting by Sharkus · · Score: 1

    A very interesting concept, is it just me or is it kinda six degrees of serparation like? I'm now trying to find out who I know whose a member, somehow I don't think my peers are :D So, who wants to start up a Tau-Delta-Kai to go up against the Omegas.... sorry, the Orkuts ;-) :D :D

  162. Search for search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the google search result for 'search engine'.

  163. You guys don't get it.. by Seeka · · Score: 1

    The whole reason Friendster/Orkut is invite-only is because if somebody else invited you into the system, then you must, at some level, be socially acceptable.

    Girls don't want to go out with anybody. Moreover, they need a way to justify to themselves and to their friends later on WHY they went out with you/did things with you.

    Since you met over the system, then it's "ok" to feel attracted because other girls are feeling attracted too.

    1. Re:You guys don't get it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Girls don't want to go out with anybody.
      You dont know too many girls do you?
  164. I got in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey guys, they let me in!
    Gimme some time to scope it out & make sure nobody's suspicious. If it's all good I'll meet you at the back window in fifteen minutes.
    OK wish me luck! ... That's how I got into a frat party once, where we proceeded to steal all their beer from the kitchen and run away. :-)

  165. .net??? by pbreit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone else surprised that it's .net?

  166. into the arms of corporations by r5t8i6y3 · · Score: 1

    who don't have your interests at heart.

    please just go and submit all your personal information directly to Upromise.com to expedite your complete enslavement to your corporate masters.

    nothing is free.

    if the above statement rings true for you then the next obvious question to ask of a "free" service being offered to you by a bottom-line for-profit corporation is, "how does the corporation profit?"

    i'm annoyed at how quickly my fellow geeks are rushing our society headlong into a dystopian fantasy novel.

    skip Friendster, Orkut, Upromise, and other data profiling entities and go sign-up for an Anonymizer account (yes, i know they are not perfect). do something to further the vision you have for the type of society you want to live in.

    hoping to not meet you all in more repressive and restrictive society a few years down the road. please choose something different.

    peace

  167. Re: "UI weenies" by SkiingOnMars · · Score: 1

    I agree that good system architects don't start with fonts, but otherwise I halfheartedly disagree. Code designed from one reference point is difficult to use from another, in my experience.

    It's possible to have both good UI design AND good back-end design, and have them work together. It usually requires several people working together synergistically. And calling them "UI weenies" isn't going to make systems software any better.

    Back to the topic, I do concur that for people to *ever* pay for Friendster, whatever the back end is needs to work WAY better.

  168. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by doublem · · Score: 1

    What makes doing a bunch of guys at 3 degrees any different than just doing a bunch of random guys?
    I didn't express what I meant as clearly as I would have liked.

    They're proud of being VERY sexually active.

    Friendster is just one venue for meeting guys.

    The benefit is that they know guys they meet through other friends are less likely to be psychos who'll tie them up and leave them in the basement for three days, beat them or otherwise do things they do not want done.

    Guys their friends have already done are an extra bonus.

    That, and these communities tend to be rather closed, in that once inside, there's a lot of action, but people outside it have to get blood tests to get in. (No pun intended)

    It's not something to be more proud of, it's just safer than picking up people in bars.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  169. if anyone cares... by shelleymonster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    email me and i'll send you an invite.
    shelley{at}shelleymonster{dot}com

    --

    got biv?
  170. That would be fine: by lysium · · Score: 1
    Simply say you are in beta and remove the 'join' button from the pretty, pretty web page. If they have time to code color-shifting pages, they should have time to explain that they are in Testing, Development, Beta, whatever.

    ==============

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  171. This is an expansion... by ghostis · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...of smaller social experiment done at Standford with a network called Club Nexus. Orkut was an architect of that experiment. Now he operates on the grand scale of the entire internet. Orkut.com will be able to read clustering, small world effect, and weak tie strength in the global internet society.

    http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue8_6/adamic /

    --


    Computer Science is all about trying to find the right wrench to bang in the right screw. -T.Cumbo?
  172. I got an invitation by arcadia · · Score: 1

    Yea, I got the invitation to join and joined, it's interesting. It's an interesting idea and they have forums and chats now, and some simple games such as chess and backgammon. Hopefully it get bigger.

    Hopefully it remains uninfected for a while.

    1. Re:I got an invitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      send me an invitation please!!! Thank u so much!!!
      steve
      Warnb4kickmeoff@cs.com

    2. Re:I got an invitation by rgbum · · Score: 1

      send me an invitation too..please!!!!!!!!

    3. Re:I got an invitation by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested in getting an invitation if you could. Please? ;)

      adam[at]darkfire[dot]net

      Thanks

    4. Re:I got an invitation by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1
      What a bunch of joiners....

      I hereby propose that slashsters only rule of membersip is that you can't have been invited to join Orkut...

      "Sir, we'd like to join your fraternity?"

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
  173. Re:Sad News Captain Kangaroo, dead at 76 by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

    Additional information at WashingtonPost.com - Captain Kangaroo.

  174. Here's what you do... by Quixote · · Score: 2, Funny
    To see if someone you know has an Orkut account, head on over to their "forgot password" page here, enter their email address, and hit submit.

    If it responds with "invalid e-mail address", then you struck out; if not, score!

    Now, next thing to do is to automate this with your mailbox, and then see which of your "friends" didn't invite you!

  175. SEnd me an invite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if u or anyone u know is on this please send me an invite. I'm dying to see this dumb site.
    thanx
    Steve
    Warnb4kickmeoff@cs.com

  176. The man himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's a picture of Orkut. I understand why everyone's clammering to be his friend:

    http://www.stanford.edu/~orkut/bwphotos/p105.jpg

  177. country club of the web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the first time i've seen this sort of thing and it seems like the virtual online equivilent of a country club. or shriners

  178. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

    Dude you do realize your friendster profile is being slashdotted right now?

  179. Orkut running Windows/ASP.NET ... HMM by x31forest · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well well, and I thought google is all for linux. It seems their orkut site is running on a Windows ASP.NET platform. That can be checked easily with http://www.orkut.com/inc which is an invalid page but shows you their menu structure.

    1. Re:Orkut running Windows/ASP.NET ... HMM by anno1602 · · Score: 1

      Apache can serve asp-pages. And according to Netcraft, Orkut is running Linux.

  180. Re:Join Orkut may have to be rephrased by Ahaldra · · Score: 1

    .. to "how to join orkut".
    I agree the wording now is a little to equal to the vocabulary of these shady figures standing in front of questionable etablissements everybody surely heard friends of one's friends friends talk about ;-)

    --
    Code is Speech. No to Censorship.
  181. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by ehiris · · Score: 1

    If dating is your main intention I'd recommend you use hotornot. It's cheaper then match.com and has so far worked for me. Match.com has never worked for me.

  182. REALLY, REALLY old news by nsample · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I had to put on my tinfoil hat for this one, but "Orkut" is really, REALLY old news. The funny thing was, all mention of it has been virtually stripped from Google. "Orkut" is the revival of "Club Nexus", something Orkut built while at Stanford University. You can see a more complete description of Orkut/Club Nexus here.

    Also, Stanford mentions it here. It's also been live for quite sometime as Stanford's inCircle. The oldest mentions I can find in Google are from 1991, but then again, Google's been pretty well stripped of information on the subject.

    The oddest part, of course, is that http://www.clubnexus.com/ is gone, and purged from the Google cache. Same thing is true of http://clubnexus.stanford.edu/. *sigh*

    Anyway, here's Club Nexus/Orkut in a nutshell: "Some people were upset because they're not sexy," says Buyokkokten.

    Cheers.

  183. I'd add you to my 'friends' list for that post... by janbjurstrom · · Score: 1

    ..but the irony would be unbearable. Oh well..

    Very well put, nevertheless, I'll be reading more from you.

    --
    668.5
  184. No. No. No. by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    I would never join any club that would have me as a member -- to paraphrase Groucho.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  185. Are the 12,000 people all white too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice how representative the people in the photo on the site are of the global community? Not....

  186. Wait a Finno-Ugric second.... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    Orkut.

    That's the plural. You are assuming the Finns are a promiscuous people, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Wait a Finno-Ugric second.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are assuming the Finns are a promiscuous people
      Well, if they are not, I am...

  187. Orkut Zeitgeist? by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 1
    What would be extremely interesting would be, in a years time, a "zeitgeist" of Orkut, in graphical (maybe even Flash) form, that shows the spread of the network from the initial 12,000.


    A similar concept has already been done for the corporate pigopolists at They Rule - Flash required, but it's worth it.


    My prediction - that ALL of the branches of the social Orkut network bend back on themselves to focus on a single individual being that is the source and underpinning of all human thought , culture and society on this planet - Kevin Bacon

  188. Urban Legend.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a really old one, at that.

    http://spanish.about.com/library/weekly/aa072301 a. htm

  189. Re: News flash to the muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A troll! Why, it is so true! If muslims are so good at grasping Western ideas, why did a muslim just bring up that Turks usually go by their first name, as if it is a novel convention used in Turkey and not elsewhere?

  190. google search by sinucus · · Score: 1

    Doing a google search for orkut invitationreturns 19 results. We all suck...

  191. Hm... by Eminence · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many of those invitations went outside the US. Probably few or none.

    Anyway... mod me up! I want to get invited!!!! :-)

  192. Buddyzoo does this by Patik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Buddyzoo already does something like this. You upload your AIM buddy list and it draws connections between people by seeing who has who on their list. It rates your popularity based on how many people have you on their list and makes note of cliques (when a group of people all have each other on their list). It even generates a nice SVG diagram to show how the people on your list are linked with each other.

  193. Trade ya by virid · · Score: 1

    I'll trade a friendster invite for a Okrut invite. Any takers??

    --
    "The world only exists in your eyes. You can make it as big or as small as you want." - F Scott Fitzgerald
  194. Starts out white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, and you can modify the CSS just like I did:

    in style.css at www.orkut.com/ find the line .W { color: #FFFFFF } and then change the F's to zeroes or use your favorite color as a whole.

    Just remember that you'll need to make sure the HTML code reflects this by using <span class="W"> and also that the SCRIPT tag added a special "ws" name to this piece of code, so in its current condition the entire line reads
    <span id="ws" class="W"> unless you know how to modify the code

  195. Initial seeding could determine the end result? by dspyder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's interesting... assume you're trying to colonize a planet... or pick a sperm donor for your baby. Do you want to pick 12,000 computer geeks? 12,000 socialites? 12,000 loose slutty women? 12,000 smart people? 12,000 funny people? 12,000 people with "a great personality" (aka: ugly)? A mixture of both/all? Will the intermingle? Will their procreations become boringly average people?

    6degrees or whatever it was called was fascinating to me. Not so much for the seperation angle or the giant cloud, but rather for the cliques that showed up and/or developed.

    I wonder how Googles newly populated universe will end up. And I wonder how cool it would be to have a UID
    --D

  196. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1
    I could depost a mammoth stool sample in your glovebox for free, too. Would you like to sign up for that because it's at no charge?

    Free stool... last chance.

    --

    -
    Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  197. How Exclusive Can It Be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to commit suicide if I find out that their membership rolls already include Cowboy Neal.

  198. I smell a discrimination lawsuit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If Google's invite list looks like the photos on the webpage, they may be asking for a discrimination lawsuit. (Everyone's young and white). Their imminent IPO raises the question can a public company run a social network whose admittance policy discriminates based on who you know? I think they can probably get away with only offering the service to citizens of the US or EU, but can they get away with offering a service that is only available to the cool friends of the chosen 1200 and their cool friends? Professional clubs in most US states and cities aren't allowed to discriminate by race or sex; will this be treated any differently?

    Personally, I dislike laws that enforce who you can associate with, but given that they exist, it seems like this service may easily run afoul of them.

  199. Google == Good People by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Google is definitely a group of nice folks. They are one of the few entities (perhaps *the* only who could actually get away with it) that could simply get GoogleGear to change their name by just eliminating any references to "googlegear" from their database. Instead, they went for a peaceful solution.

  200. Oh, great.. by Sir+Pallas · · Score: 1

    Now even the nerds won't let me into their circle of friends.. although, I'm sure there is hope. Someone will start selling invitations on Amazon, and I'll just have to buy my friends again.

  201. Who cares? by vanyel · · Score: 1

    A friend invited me into Friendster and I got on to see what it was like, but being that restrictive, there was no one to link to or find anything about, and all the friends I already have, I talk to with email or voice just fine and Friendster really offers nothing to even give me a reason to invite them, so what's the point? Something like that is for finding *new* friends, so I haven't been back. Don't see any reason to even be interested in Google's version...

  202. Can Anyone Say "Beta"? by gbulmash · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you look in the upper right corner near the "Orkut" logo/name, you'll see "Beta" in light letters.

    I'd guess the reason it's invite only is to keep things manageable. If you had a community in beta, would you want it slashdotted with new users (many of whom would bitch and moan about every glitch) while you were still trying to smooth out the rough edges?

    I'm sure that once Google feels this is ready for unfettered public consumption, the invitation only rule will die.

    Greg

    1. Re:Can Anyone Say "Beta"? by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 1

      >> I'd guess the reason it's invite only is to keep things manageable. If you had a community in beta, would you want it slashdotted with new users...

      Google News is also in "Beta", as is Froogle. For some reason, they're not using exclusionary practices to limit traffic to these sites...

      I'll be surprised if Google keeps it closed like this, as it seems so, well, anti-Google.

      For what it's worth, even Friendster is still labled "Beta".

  203. Re: News flash to the muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just an FYI, an informative bit of trivia. Actually, people go by their first names ourside North America far more often. And in Poland actually, people don't really celebrate their birthdays. The nameday is the big occassion... each name gets a day on a calendar (several per day obviously), and if you don't have a 'regular' name it's just mapped to something else. Although I've been living in Canada the last, oh, 15 years almost, so kinda under Soviet rule still when I was there last, and things are probably 'westernizing' over there.

  204. yes! by Myopic · · Score: 1

    i got an invite. pfffft! ;-)

  205. Re:SocNets we'd like to see, alt.hackers approach by erice · · Score: 1

    Mobster: you must be a member of a gang or Mafia. To get in, you need to have a rap sheet with at least 20 entries. First 12,000 invites went to email addresses in Federal prisons.

    Officially, no on else can join. Unofficially, you just need to make us an offer we can't refuse.

    Witchster: you must be an initiate into witchcraft. To get in you need to have posted at least one spell of your own creation, with details on the underlying operation principles. First 12,000 invites went to the High Priest/Priestesses of covens registered as nonprofits.

    The master list is kept sealed in vault and never updated. It is, hower, checked periodically. If your name magically shows up on the list, you're in.

  206. Profit! by ichandarin · · Score: 1

    1. Set up invitation-only clique service
    2. Give invitations to google execs
    3. Give away a few to celebrities
    4. Google execs sell the rest to the masses of wannabe-popular nerds
    5. Profit!!!

    --
    Denn wir sind wie Baumstaemme im Schnee. Scheinbar liegen sei glatt auf, mit kleinem anstoss sollte man sie wegschieben
  207. Re: News flash to the muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are so smart. Even smarter than G. W. Bush. Why don't you go shoot some more muslims to teach the great Western ideas.

  208. STD's by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Aren't we Linux users pretty-much immune to the internet-sex STD's?

  209. Re: News flash to the muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought most of Poland was Catholic? I know most Orthodox Christian peoples celebrate namesdays of the parton saint for their name. People named Nicholas, celebrate on the day for Saint Nick, etc.

    No, this was not interesting trivia, as it is not really common to go by last names. That is why in Seinfield it was so amusing when the owner of the Yankees Steinbreiner, instead of saying George, called him Co-stan-zaa!

  210. Re: News flash to the muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Muslim leaders make Jeb Bush look like a Saint. If muslim countries where not so weak economically and militarily, they would still be waging jihad to annex the entire non-muslim world, just like they were doing before they became a military joke compared to the West. Just remember, the Turks and their Siege of Vienna or the Battle of Lepanto(Nafpaktos).

  211. As soon as the first few slashdotters are picked.. by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    ...suddenly all those "friend & foe" options will become a whole lot more important.

    Oh, Oh, Pick me, Pick me, I'm your slash dot friend, don't you remember!

  212. Orkut won't let you in? by cocobongo · · Score: 2, Funny

    So let's see, this great site that noone can even see is the next big wave?

  213. Geek Masons? by argent · · Score: 1

    Is this supposed to be a kind of Masonic Lodge for geeks?

    Well, um, I can neither confirm nor deny the presence of other places, but what good is a secret club everyone knows about?

  214. FOAF by martinpaljak · · Score: 1

    Hey, we should be over of this 'i run this service' mania. FOAF project is way more interesting and it's open - everybody can specify their friends. without invitations. viva la open web!

  215. You shouldn't have said that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... now you're never going to get in.

  216. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I am on both friendster and e2, so take this with the proper emphasis if you can; e2 is a place to get laid if you have a beautiful mind, and hotornot is the place to get laid if you have a beautiful body. Or at least, a decent one.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  217. Re:only for white people ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get back on the boat buddy. No one wants you here.

  218. i'll screw the system by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    if i ever get invited to join orkut (not likely), i'll invite all of you slashdotters, and everyone else i can convince to join as well.

    we'll show em.

  219. Re:I'd add you to my 'friends' list for that post. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    LOL Thanks that was classic. I'm going to have to cut and paste this entire thread I've started to my blog to save it for posterity.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  220. The Yak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm part of another exclusive social-circles site called The Yak which only allows people to join if they know current members. Seems like a number of these have been popping up lately.

    http://www.theyak.com

  221. Re:I'd add you to my 'friends' list for that post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many affirmative replies to the original post. Seems like you guys had it tough in high school.

  222. Popular with who? by fm6 · · Score: 1

    I doubt if Friendster is all that popular, in the sense of having lots of enthusiastic members. Given the quality of their software, popularity would destroy them! But they are good at generating buzz. Which makes them popular where they want to be popular -- in the media and on Wall Street.

    1. Re:Popular with who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are they popular on Wall Street ? What are you talking about ? Their stock ?

      The site has over 5 MILLION registered users

  223. We are Orkut's Science Project! by Kylow · · Score: 1

    http://216.239.53.104/search?q=cache:DvnGUlUZgusJ: www.hpl.hp.com/shl/papers/social/social.pdf+orkut+ invite&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

  224. Name issue by ahmetaa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Orkut Buyukkokten is a Turkish name-surname. Orkut is actually an ancient name probably thousand year ago it was used. Buyukkokten literally means "Coming from big root" or "Has big roots" Please do not make fun of names.

  225. No, its not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have no sence of hummor. Eat potatoes and die.

  226. Re:Hey, Linux professionals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, have discovered one of the great faults in Linux. There is indeed no high-quality commercial numeric mathematics package. All programming under Linux is done either with 'C' or 'Perl'. Both of these tools are unsuitable for the demands of scientific computing. 'C' is too low-level and does not support secure code. That leaves you with 'Perl', but it is poorly designed and produces very inefficient code.

    Your best choice is to report your manager from the Navy to the Department of Homeland Security. If they know that a member of America's armed forces, entrusted with defending the USA against terrorism, is undermining national security by promoting the use of communistic and insecure software designed by foreign hackers, they will surely remove them from their position and replace them with someone patriotic, the end result being that they will switch back to Windows and you will be able to fully utilize your programming skills.

  227. Number of Google employees by solprovider · · Score: 1

    Google just passed 1,000 employees, with around 650 full-timers having stock options. (We had a recent discussion about this when it was announced they were going public.)

    So maybe 12,000 includes all Google's employees, their families and closest friends? Or maybe it includes their suppliers and customers?

    Free bonus! Buy an ad on Google and get invitied to join Orkut!

    (You have my apologies for nitpicking a funny post.)

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
  228. exactly as it should be by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
    Actually, this is exactly as it should be. If it ever comes to that with Google, I wouldn't want to live in a place where the powerful monopoly is worshipped like a moustached leader.

    Bottom line: I'm all for cheering for the little guys, and booing the big boys. It's the sanest thing to do.

  229. ORGYT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Matchmaking for an elitist society... that's what it will be used for.

    Could as well have been called ORGYT

  230. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention "poly" not "polly".

  231. Ryze? by aalaap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I prefer Ryze.com. It's basically a social networking site but its got more of a Business Networking angle to it. You're free to sign up, but you have to "make" friends by requesting people to be added to your friends' list, and that doesn't happen till they click "OK". So that way, though its open unlike Orkut, there's still the element of closed clusters or whatever it is that you call them. I just won't add to my list the people I don't trust. Unless of course she's hot.. eh eh..ahem.

    www.ryze.com

    - Aalaap

  232. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

    The only use I could see for this is for file trading? Do either services let you do this, and if not then what does it do?
    Regards,
    Steve

  233. Can social and business networking co-exist? by ThatAdamGuy · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've been playing with orkut.com for the last day or so, and it's definitely a pleasurable step up from Friendster (though admittedly, Friendster sucks pretty hard).

    One thing that I'm curious and/or concerned about, however, is whether orkut can really be -- as it seemingly intends -- all things to all networkers. In this early version, there seems to be enough goofy/mushy/flirty stuff in it to deter serious business networkers (who'll likely prefer spoke.com), but not enough of the romance/love/sex component to effectively compete with Yafro, Match.com, and Evite.

    Currently orkut's (obviously) got the Google cache plus the processor speed that comes along with that. Additionally, the founding members of orkut.com are largely Googlers who -- from my cursory observation and knowledge -- happen to be largely intelligent and interesting people.

    I've actually written a more detailed review of my initial orkut experiences, and I'd certainly welcome feedback :)

    --
    Only the truly shameless shill their blog in a Slashdot sig
  234. money by Popageorgio · · Score: 1

    All that money and they used milk carton faces for their splash page?

  235. Though clearly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you're not l33t enough to have a Slashdot account.

    Man, that's pretty weak. If I were you, I'd seriously consider a tailpipe blowjob.

  236. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's where the chicks are.

  237. Better center by Daath · · Score: 1

    Actually a better suggestion would be Rod Steiger, but then again, people would have no clue what you were talking about, would they :)

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:Better center by Daath · · Score: 1

      Oh and for the uninitiated, we're talking about the Oracle of Bacon, which is pretty cool! :)

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    2. Re:Better center by Patrick · · Score: 1
      Canonical link: oracleofbacon.org. Just FYI.

      --The Oracle

  238. i tried to register on Friendster by kaykay_2k1 · · Score: 1
    This is what i got-->>

    "Error: Cannot access database. java.lang.NullPointerException "

    Somebody invite me to Orkut !!!!

  239. why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is this news if it's by invitation
    only?

    are there so many lonely nerds around?

  240. A wise man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...learns from the mistakes of Friendster. Here's a bunch of MIT students analyses of usability of Friendster plus suggestions for fixes.

    http://philip.greenspun.com/teaching/6171/2003-f al l/friendster

    Cheers,
    Mike

  241. because it's spelled 'clique'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that just might be the tick!

    1. Re:because it's spelled 'clique'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a proud American and I won't let some pansy European dictate me how to spell things. The UN is irrelevant and can't tell me how to spell, either.

  242. YOU ARE NOW BEING... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...MODDED as Troll so quickly, why not just give up and fuck off? You're not funny and you're not clever. bye.

  243. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Unless you're having sex with parrots.

  244. Re:Friendster is so 2003 by autocracy · · Score: 1

    *coughs* what? you've got explain that that... I dig around e2 when I want to look up something with better-than-encyclopia explanation. How getting laid fits into this makes my head spin. I went to check it out now too, totally puzzled. Still don't get it.

    --
    SIG: HUP
  245. Can't buy this stuff. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    As a testament to the power of word-of-mouth advertising, I now have a Friendster account.

    I feel kinda skeevy.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  246. Yet Another Online Social Network Thingie by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    Has anyone else find any real value from social networking sites?
    As a person who recently got sucked into one of these things (MySpace), here's my take..

    It does not offer any significantly new functionality. What it does offer, is just a different style and look'n'feel. There are lots of different ways for people to communicate with one another, but for mysterious reasons that we'll never understand, some ways "click" with some people, and some don't. You meet different people on Usenet than you do on Slashdot, who are also different than you do on one of these types of services, who are also different than the people on another one of these types of services.

    The thing is, the more options you have, the more likely that you'll just happen to like one of them and (here's the important part) use it. And when people use this stuff (whatever their reason is) then it's a good thing, because they get people talking to one another.

    Don't worry if it plays off people's egos. That doesn't matter. What matters is that you start talking. As soon as you get one "date" (whether it's actually a romantic interlude with a member of the opposite sex, or whether you meet someone who has a common interest) then it instantly pays off. It'll be someone that, yeah, you could have emailed them, or visited their website, or instant messaged them, or replied to their blog, or whatever --- but you didn't, did you? You didn't meet them until you used this cheezy website. And it did the job.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.