Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Home Internet Access up to 75%

waytoomuchcoffee writes "Over 200 million U.S. residents now have access to the internet at home, or 3/4 of the U.S. population. This is quite a jump, as only 51% of U.S. homes had access to the internet in August of 2000. Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet access is highest among females 35-54."

345 comments

  1. ...internet access is highest among females 35-54 by Phoenix-kun · · Score: 4, Funny

    So all those email solicitations I've been getting lately from lonely housewives were real?

    --
    Phoenix
  2. Not surprising by YanceyAI · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Interestingly, among age/gender groups, Internet access is highest among females 35-54.

    Surprising to male /.ers perhaps, but not us girls...I spend eight hours a day on a T-3 at work and five nights a week on my cable connection at home. Typical home activities include updating my Web page, trolling forums, email/messaging friends, playing competitive leagues Counter-Strike, and shopping. At work, when I'm not /.ing, I'm a communications coordinator (writer & designer). I use the 'Net for research, purchasing, and communication with my colleagues.

    You guys keep being surprised, but women make up half the work force where we spend a lot of time on computers. We buy more than half of all electronic devices and more than half of all computer games (and no they are not all for our spouses/children).

    Wake up boys. This is no more news than females voting and driving!

    That said, I've noticed the net is slowing down at home and at work. Do we have the infrastructure for all of America to be online (and with blazing connections)?

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:Not surprising by darth_MALL · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wait a minute...Women have the VOTE!?

    2. Re:Not surprising by rjelks · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope there was a scientific poll done for this. If they relied on asking people their sex in AOL chatrooms, they may have to downgrade that number. /jk

    3. Re:Not surprising by Phoenix-kun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is true. One of my good friends is female and does very much of what you have listed, forums, email, web mistress, etc. In fact, she is, by far, the best competitive game-player I have ever had the pleasure to know, male or female.

      --
      Phoenix
    4. Re:Not surprising by moltar77 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's this?
      A girl on slashdot?!?

    5. Re:Not surprising by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 0, Redundant

      lol hehe :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    6. Re:Not surprising by prgrmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That said, I've noticed the net is slowing down at home and at work. Do we have the infrastructure for all of America to be online (and with blazing connections)?

      I don't think it's the infrastructure or lack thereof so much as the viri, spyware, spam, pop-ups, pop-unders, and poor configurations and security. We need to do more to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.

    7. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Surprising to male /.ers perhaps, but not us girls.
      Yes, and something needs to be done about it. Through the 80s, I was a computer scientist at Harvard University, and life was good. It was good because of the absense of women in the department, except for the secretaries. We did not have to put thought into dress codes, we did not have to be politically correct, we did not have to maintain personal hygiene - we were left to our workstations to do our work.

      We must reclaim geekdom for males!

    8. Re:Not surprising by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      this one? No. The last one? Yes.

    9. Re:Not surprising by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We buy more than half of all electronic devices and more than half of all computer games...

      Are you sure about that? I would find it surprising if that were true--especially the games part.

      Anyway, it doesn't surprise me women use the internet more. That is something I always expected would happen. First of all, there are more women than men so women will have slightly more numbers. Second, internet has great potential to replace or complement social relationships. Women seem to be more into "social stuff" than men.

      Having said that, I think most geeks will be men. So tech-oriented websites, for example, will be dominated by men. It remains to be seen if I'm right...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    10. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you need a boyfriend?

    11. Re:Not surprising by SnappleMaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "You guys keep being surprised, but women make up half the work force where we spend a lot of time on computers."

      In some sectors maybe. In "hardcore dev"... I've worked at 3 companies in my adult life (plus 4 more companies as an intern). The male/female ratio has been and remains approximately 10:1. My graduating class (Comp Eng) consisted of 80 or so guys and *zero* females.

      Now don't get me wrong. I sure wish there were more chicks around. OTOH if I go across the street to marketing the ratio is more like 2:1 with the females on top (figuratively).

      Personally, I'm surprised at the results (and wondering if they can be accurate).

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    12. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We, the SO-less masses and male majority DEMAND that you post your Phone # or email.. where have you been all our lives!!!!

    13. Re:Not surprising by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Funny

      lol hehe :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      WTH? At first I couldn't figure out what you were laughing at and thought you were laughing at your own name...

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    14. Re:Not surprising by YanceyAI · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yes. The games stat can be found by downloading the Entertainment Software Assoc. Stats book here:
      http://www.theESA.com/pressroom.html

      FYI: 39% of gamers are women, but they buy most games.

      The electronics stat was posted on Slashdot a few days ago...I'd look for it, but I'm busy working...

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    15. Re:Not surprising by YanceyAI · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It doesn't say most hardcore developers, it says most Internet users...

      Also consider that women do most of the desk work in the US, using computers to do their jobs...

      Get out of your tech-hole and realize most people use the Internet daily for work and daily for entertainment and staying in touch. Women slightly more than half the population.

      And actually, I would guess hardcore developers aren't on the Net when they are at work. Aren't they are coding???

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    16. Re:Not surprising by zsz2k · · Score: 1

      The question is, if people had to actually configure their own /etc/ppp/options file, how would these figures change? Back in the day, there was a barrier to entry - and all was good. Then AOL came along and nowadays, going online is like hitting the on-button on a remote. The result? Look at how the signal to noise ratio of the web has dropped through the roof in the last few years.

    17. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      FYI: 39% of gamers are women, but they buy most games.

      Yes, because the males pirate the rest of them.

    18. Re:Not surprising by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      Why is it assumed that men are suprsied, I'm not.

      Just $0.02

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    19. Re:Not surprising by be-fan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Bill Clinton is a hottie!

      This is going to come back to haunt me sooner or later :)

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    20. Re:Not surprising by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      And why it is assumed that people can spell I can't.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    21. Re:Not surprising by zsz2k · · Score: 1

      In related news, more women than men watch TV.

    22. Re:Not surprising by psichaotic · · Score: 0

      You almost had a point. Though I would have to call your bluff on the computer game thing. Then again, what constitutes a computer game these days.. a disk you buy and install or does a game of Slingo count. You would think if that were true there would be a hell of a lot of Barbie games out there. Not to totally stereotype female players into goodie goodie roles as far as game play, but lets face it, its rare to see a female in any game commercial, unless its a CGI of a female, usually large of breast and light of clothing. Lets see some numbers, being an engineer, thats what I like to use.

    23. Re:Not surprising by metlin · · Score: 1

      I'd look for it, but I'm busy working...

      Whats that?

    24. Re:Not surprising by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      First off, I do live in a tech hole, but I'm happy so it's ok. Anyways I was replying to your post about the ratio of females in tech jobs. My personal experience is just what I said. It's not false but it is personal. Given that I've worked a variety of company types and had meetings with many others in two countries (more if you want to count customer visits) I feel my personal experience is not terribly inaccurate.

      Back to the original article... I still don't see how they figure females in that age bracket are #1. I just can't see that being true, but who knows.

      I suppose it depends on how they count "access". My grandma has "access" in that she lives in a house with an Internet connection but she has never actually been online herself. Would she be counted?

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    25. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way "the VOTE" has always been slung around it sounds like something both men and women should avoid like, "the CLAP" or some other terrible venereal disease.

      Frankly the women are welcome to it, and my "the Receding hair line" and all those other things chauvinistic males have been hording all to themselves, I say, equal misery for everyone.

      While we are sharing, where do I sign up for menopause, and pregnancy.

    26. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Virtual dollhouse, a.k.a. The Sims, sold very well. That game and its addons is probably most of the games sold to women. The puzzle games, like the Popcap ones probably account for just about all the rest. I know there are exceptions, but this should be a good start.

      Looking at the number of vague words I used, I likely have no idea what I am talking about. So take it for what it's worth.

    27. Re:Not surprising by bluprint · · Score: 1

      -- 39% of gamers are women

      -- 57% of people who purchase games are women

      (and no they are not all for our spouses/children).

      I think a good deal of those purchases MUST be attributed to spouses/children. If not, then you would be saying that women who DO play games, play something like 1.5x as many different games as their male counterparts, and I can't think of any reason at all to believe that. It's a lot easier to believe that women do more Christmas/birthday/etc shopping than men.

      Personally, my wife certainly plays as much as I do, but I'm the one who finds new games to play, and then she will start playing our new purchase as well.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    28. Re:Not surprising by rixstep · · Score: 0, Troll

      We buy more than half of all electronic devices

      Uh, I'm not so sure. You buy way more than half the battery operated devices though.

    29. Re:Not surprising by kaden · · Score: 1
      At the risk of sounding misogynistic, I used to play an RPG called Asheron's Call on a full-scale Player Vs. Player server called Darktide. No safe zones, everyone killed newbies and lowbies mercilessly, for the fun of it. Because a single death could ruin your afternoon, and because it took hundreds of hours to level up to the point where you could join a guild or defend yourself, it was an extremely harsh place to try to be.

      The demographics? 1,000+ people were online throughout the day, I'd estimate 20,000 mid or high level players between November 1999 and November 2001. During that time, there were only five openly female players (and two of them were just playing characters their boyfriends leveled up).

      Now that's obviously an extreme, the more hostile the environment the greater the likelihood that it will be all loser teenage males, but it's those sorts of situations that make us oldschool gamers find it hard to believe that all games are 50/50 by gender. Some are like that, but some are still 95/5.

    30. Re:Not surprising by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      It seems no one on Slashdot understood the original joke about AOL chatrooms and guys calling themselves girls... The original post is still modded insightful, when it should be funny...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    31. Re:Not surprising by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Your example can be misleading because I think PK-type (PK=player killer) games would be more appealing to men. You can't base that on women. Similarly, I would think that sports games would be mainly played by men. In contrast, strategy (eg. Sims) or adventure would probably have more women. Anyway, that's my impression.

      All of our experience will be biased. Men will do things that are male-oriented (whatever the hell that means) so they won't meet women, and vice versa.

      Having said that, when I was a gamer until a few years ago, there were only a few women. The type of games I played were RTS, RPG, and strategy and I didn't really run into too many women.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    32. Re:Not surprising by GAVollink · · Score: 1
      An internet connected computer on a desk does NOT a tech job make.

      In most companies everyone outside of the facilities dept. gets an internet connected computer.

    33. Re:Not surprising by Requiem · · Score: 1

      LOL OMG BBQ

    34. Re:Not surprising by jcsehak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, hold on! I thought it was about their suffering, and it was cute that they didn't know how to spell. That whole thing was about voting? Damn, those women can be crafty...

      --

      c-hack.com |
    35. Re:Not surprising by YanceyAI · · Score: 1

      But nobody ever said tech job.....reread please..that was not my argument.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    36. Re:Not surprising by YanceyAI · · Score: 1

      And granted, I don't think I represent the "average" female gamer, but I play Counter-Strike--terrorist vs. counterterrorist fps. I'm on our UGC-Advanced team and am our Cal-o leader. I'm the only girl im my clan, but there must be enough interest, or this wouldn't be starting up: Female Cyber League.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    37. Re:Not surprising by rjelks · · Score: 1

      I'm so misunderstood.

    38. Re:Not surprising by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. In that case I point to my "In some sectors maybe." clause. I suppose I'm talking bananas and you're talking apples. Feel free to ignore the blithering techie... :)

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    39. Re:Not surprising by CrayzyJ · · Score: 1

      >And actually, I would guess hardcore developers >aren't on the Net when they are at work. Aren't >they are coding???

      This is a big short sighted. What about Telnet? X-windows? Without a conn, I go home early.

      In addition, there is MUCH more to development than just heads down coding. R&D on the net as well as code storage on a server. You get the idea...

      --
      Holy s-, it's Jesus!
    40. Re:Not surprising by GAVollink · · Score: 1
      Dpes anybody remember the virtual pet for Windows 3.1? There was a dog and a cat version, maybe others? Those were very popular among women 8 years ago - and they were not sold as "business apps".

      Yet another product replaced with a Microsoft product (clippy in MS Office).

      I've known several women who actually play video games though. They certainly spend more time gaming than I do.

    41. Re:Not surprising by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, how many mothers buy the games for their kids, then?

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    42. Re:Not surprising by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's due to the fact that "The Sims" has about 12 expansion packs, and the purchase of each one counts as one game?

    43. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wake up boys. This is no more news than females voting and driving!

      That said, I've noticed the net is slowing down at home and at work


      Yeah, women drivers.

    44. Re:Not surprising by Pikhq · · Score: 1

      Current version: Petz 4 (owns Petz 1, 2, & 3) There, mod me down as being an idiot now...

      --
      echo "rm -rf ~/* ; echo "echo "Exit" ; exit" > ~/.bashrc ; exit" > ~user/.bashrc
    45. Re:Not surprising by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, I get your parent's post, it's just that the way you wrote your post (potentially unclear content directly followed by your name) made it joke fodder.

      Incidentally... I think a lot of people are using Insightful mods now to mod Funny posts up so that the poster gets Karma. Downmods from a Funny post can hurt your Karma, but upmods to Funny don't help it, so a lot of people seem to be short-circuiting this oddity by using karma-giving upmods on Funny posts and hoping that the reader is smart enough not to rely on the mod result to determine what is and isn't a joke.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    46. Re:Not surprising by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      You've increased the percentage of women on the Internet by 1% just by making so many posts to this article. Good job.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    47. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's talk user numbers junior. I've been contributing awhile.

    48. Re:Not surprising by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      What's your angle? Why are you lying?

      I'm not saying what you're saying is validated as false, but it is certainly not validated as true. That site says nothing about "women buy more games than men". It seems like you're trying to spread some sort of anti-male sentiment? Get with it, such things are foolish.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    49. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The question is, if people had to actually configure their own /etc/ppp/options file, how would these figures change? Back in the day, there was a barrier to entry - and all was good.

      and the GNAA's periodic crapfloods of Slashdot are living proof that techies are so much more mature

    50. Re:Not surprising by plastid · · Score: 1

      If there are so many geeky girls out there, how come my CS courses are such sausage fests?

      I'm not a picky man, but give me SOMETHING to work with here.....

    51. Re:Not surprising by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      That's some interesting reverse psychology theory you are putting forward. Either that, or Slashdot just doesn't have a sense of humour ;)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    52. Re:Not surprising by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      lol you DO look like the devil ;) Very scary looking pose in your pic :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    53. Re:Not surprising by gitana · · Score: 1

      These days useing the internet has very little to do with being tech oriented.

    54. Re:Not surprising by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the modal age-group would be 18-24.

    55. Re:Not surprising by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > LOL OMG BBQ

      All the lame jokes on /. and this made me laugh the loudest... strange.

    56. Re:Not surprising by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > If there are so many geeky girls out there

      There aren't... these statistics are about housewives chatting on IRC or doing regular Web surfing. Just because Joe Redneck can browse the web, it does not mean he's a geek.

    57. Re:Not surprising by Cybrr · · Score: 1

      BBQ? In winter?

      --
      Why did GEAR crush RDP?
  3. computers by bsharitt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't know computer ownership was that high

    1. Re:computers by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the bottom line, Internet-capable computers are getting very close to joining the telephone, running water, and television as being assumed to be in every home in the USA.

    2. Re:computers by ttldkns · · Score: 1

      **obligatory simpsons quote...**

      "They have the internet on computers now?"

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    3. Re:computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That joke is usually attributed to the Simpsons, but it was actually on Family Guy.

    4. Re:computers by maxbang · · Score: 1

      Is there a non-Internet capable computer out there somewhere hiding behind my abacus?

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    5. Re:computers by prostoalex · · Score: 4, Informative


      About 30 million Americans are accessing the Internet from some place other than home or work. School, neighbor's house or friend's house, and libraries.

    6. Re:computers by essaunders · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My father still has and uses an apple IIgs. A useable non-internet capable computer if I've ever seen one.

    7. Re:computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may have been on Family Guy as well, but it was definitely on The Simpsons.

    8. Re:computers by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      [HomerSimpson]

      They have the Internet on computers now?

      [/HomerSimpson]

    9. Re:computers by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      On a related note, trojan'd Windows machines being used as spamming zombies up 25% as well. Do we really want everyone on the internet?

    10. Re:computers by amilham · · Score: 1

      Definitely. If it was on Family Guy, it was ripped off from The Simpsons. Specifically, it was episode 5F11.

    11. Re:computers by Tassach · · Score: 1

      If it can run a terminal emulator and connect to another computer, it's internet capable. I was using my Apple IIc to read newsgroups and mail via UMBC's Unix server in 1988.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    12. Re:computers by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Call me an elitist...but I don't think that computer ownership should be as high as it is.

      In my job, I spend a good portion of my week explaining to 'network administrators' what it means to 'right click.' Hell, some of these people can't even say the word 'computer' (compurtur, puter, thingy, tv)

      I'm suprised that some of these people can breathe, yet they tell me "I'm not computer illiterate, how do I build a website" and "why can't I connect, my machine says 'no dial tone' why did you turn off my phone service!"

      You have no idea how often I rewrite webpages posted on my servers because it's easier than explaining to my customers why their pages don't display properly. They'd rather upload a website that looks like $#!+ than pay somebody to do it right.

      I remember a time when owning a computer indicated that you had some technical ability.....now it just means that you walked too close to the computer department at wal-mart.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    13. Re:computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But him an apple cat modem off ebay or something :P

      I had one of those ages ago. Granted, that was the age of the BBS, but it CAN be put on the internet, one way or another (even if you have to telnet somewhere to use lynx).

    14. Re:computers by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Call me an elitist...but I don't think that computer ownership should be as high as it is.

      I'll go a step forward and call you an ignorant, arrogant elitist, although I doubt there are too many "very nice elitists" out there. Your opinion is why people hate geeks.

      Call me elitist, but unless you can change a head gasket on an engine (hell, if I can do it successfully the first time, it's not that hard), you shouldn't be driving a car. Sound familiar?

    15. Re:computers by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 1

      Ignorant? hardly. Arrogant? maybe. Hated? only by you. I'd venture to say that among the users whom I deal with regularly, I'm universally loved.

      Yes, I can change a head gasket...and transmissions....clutches.....freeze plugs....power steering/fuel/oil/water pumps. There's a big difference between operating a vehicle / knowing its/your limitations and being a mechanic.

      I don't consider myself a mechanic....but I can and very often RTFM, which is a concept that 98.72% of the computer owning public doesn't grasp (slashdotters are with the 1.28% of the rest of us).

      Lets apply a different analogy to my 'elitist' statement. How about operating a firearm? Should there be manditory training prior to using or purchasing a firearm? I believe there should be. Firearms are generally complex machines which are inherently dangerous. If one does not know how to operate that machine, should one be allowed to use or own that machine?

      Besides being difficult to operate, early personal computers were extremely expensive (I recall spending a couple hundred dollars for 4MB of RAM). Those two reasons alone kept most people from owning computers. People simply didn't spend that kind of money on an appliance they didn't know how to operate.

      I'd prefer to see Internet Appliances in place of PC's in most cases. They're functional enough for the average user (the average being not computer literate), and they are difficult to break.

      This will probably get modded down to 'troll,' but I've had it up to my eyeballs with people attempting to compute beyond their ability.

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
    16. Re:computers by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I'd prefer to see Internet Appliances in place of PC's in most cases.

      Oh, well if that is your argument, yes, of course. They would be cheaper, more user-friendly, and much easier to maintain. Unfortunately, I was thinking in the realm of reality instead of what should be (yeah, there are internet appliances, but most suck ass). Yes, almost all PCs are WAAAAAY overpowered to be a web browser/EMail wachine, but what do you care? It keeps us employed, doesn't it?

      (BTW, I don't hate you)

  4. The internet is so common now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to Internet2 so I can keep my l33t status.

    1. Re:The internet is so common now by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      What's happening with Internet II? I haven't heard much about it lately. Is there still progress being made or did people dump that?

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    2. Re:The internet is so common now by MoonBuggy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good idea. What button on AOL connects me to that then?

    3. Re:The internet is so common now by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're not trolling, do some work on your own and try visiting www.internet2.org.

    4. Re:The internet is so common now by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Fool, I2 is just another backbone. It's nice because it makes transfers between many US universities quite fast.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    5. Re:The internet is so common now by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I'm not trolling (although the original poster was a troll)...Man... I'm asking him/her to update me on the status of Internet 2. Obviously if I wanted to, I could have spent time looking that up. Anyway, going to the home page of Internet 2 doesn't really mean much... call me lazy if you want but I find that asking others is a fast way to learn something (will be biased but still...) :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  5. This reminds me... by clean_stoner · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This reminds me of a quote I read in one of my textbooks that said "3 out of every 4 teens have been on-line" like it was a big deal

    --

    Sigs are for the weak.

    1. Re:This reminds me... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      How old was this book? 75% online at home is one thing, but I would think at least 95% of teens have at least used the net at school/a friend's/a library.

    2. Re:This reminds me... by clean_stoner · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing, so I checked the copyright/publishing date... 2003

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

    3. Re:This reminds me... by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      What about the Omish population?

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    4. Re:This reminds me... by monkeyman_67156 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that our class uses the same text. Isn't this some kind of speech class? That book is possibly the worst example of college text book extortion. The ladder of learning? WTF?

    5. Re:This reminds me... by clean_stoner · · Score: 1

      Yep, same class. Complete BS. Oh well, easy credit.

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

  6. OSDN Personals? by StrandedOrg · · Score: 5, Funny

    "internet access is highest among females 35-54" So thats why there are 3 girls registered on the OSDN Personals instead of the one that had her pic put in the banner. That would account for the huge jump =)

    1. Re:OSDN Personals? by JPriest · · Score: 1
      I never see them in bars or at many parties. Everone I see at work is male and people spend less time in shopping malls. All the people I know that own an Xbox or PS2 are guys. I guess woman have to be somewhere doing something, why not the internet.

      That does not really explain the 1/4 girl/guy ratio on personals sites though.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:OSDN Personals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some places to meet women

      • church services

      • bookstores, usually in the self-help section (stay away from the Sci-Fi and the computer section, as much as you don't want to!)

      • jazz nightclubs.
  7. Finally an explanation.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ..for all those worm (etc) infested machines! ;)

  8. Woo! by grub · · Score: 1, Funny


    Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet access is highest among females 35-54.

    Hey! I'm 38! get ready for a flurry of "A/S/L" IMs..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  9. In December 2003 by prostoalex · · Score: 4, Informative

    In December 2003 only 126 million Americans were online. Also, interesting to note that 66 mln use the Internet on a daily basis.

  10. Age Distribution by myownkidney · · Score: 4, Funny
    M / F 2 - 17 49,078 63,270 77.60%

    Going by all the trolls on ./, I think the distribution must be close to the 2-year old end.

    1. Re:Age Distribution by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

      My son was playing games on NickJR.com at age 2. While at the low end of the age group, the percent will be lower, at the high end, I expect it to be higher. Neilson is in the business of tracking people with $$, so 2-15 get lumped together.

    2. Re:Age Distribution by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1


      Hyper-intelligent 2-year-olds posting their ASCII-art goatse.cx trolls to Slashdot is pretty darn scary. Before we know it, they'll run to their parents and say "look at me!" and pour a bowl of grits down their pants.

      Is Slashdot really a good thing?

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  11. ...internet access is highest among females 35- by medscaper · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, Internet access is actually highest among middle aged men who call themselves "Debra".

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    1. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by HungWeiLo · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and children are FBI agents.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    2. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri are also men (apologies to DNA).

    3. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by JPriest · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Maybe females between 35-54 are most likely to have kids that use the net for school?

      I dunno, my mom seems to use a computer often for her digital camera, printing greeting cards, emailing Joe cartoon attatchments etc. So it could be possible.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    4. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by TheApocalypse · · Score: 1

      What about the Shemale population?

    5. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by lysium · · Score: 3, Interesting
      and children are FBI agents.

      More precisely, they are bots that report to law enforcement.

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    6. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Two things that may possibly affect this figure...
      1. Most registration forms have a dropdown with female as the first entry(alphabetical order).
      2. What does a null date default to? 12/31/1969, just about 35 years ago.

      How many fake/minimally filled in registrations have you filled out lately?

    7. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by DoctorCool · · Score: 0

      Females are not nesessarly using it, they are simply paying for it. I know that my mom funded my internet use.

    8. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, the reason is probably because the men are smart enough to share their home internet connections between all of their roommates (or even neighbors) with NAT and home networking or WiFi. So they only get counted as one person. But the girls are the ones that buy the multiple IP addresses and all that from the cable company. I'm not trying to be insulting. In my college town, it is only the girls' houses that pay to have more than one computer connected.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    9. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I submitted that as a story yesterday but it was rejected.

    10. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by GAVollink · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh my - absolutely true. I hadn't thought of that... but my wife was the one who signed up for Cable, and my internet access is a rider on that. So my wife runs the 5 internet connected machines in my household (and logs on to check Email once a week or so).

    11. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by boaworm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hehe.. Well statistics suck!

      For instance, one of the swedish insurance companies made a large study on car insurances and accidents. They came up with the conclusion that there was a huge peak in accidens with women aged 45-55, even higher than men 18-24 etc.

      Of course this does not mean that women suddenly starts to drive like lunatics, just that by that age, most have kids.. boys... aged 18-24 :-)

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    12. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and children are FBI agents

      Yes, it's true. SURVEY: MAJORITY OF WEB USERS ARE FBI AGENTS POSING AS TEENAGE GIRLS

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    13. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by Jotaigna · · Score: 1

      quote from "American Pie 2"
      milf milf milf milf milf milf.....
      In Chile(in developement country) things are picking up as well. in a survey published in Spectrum they rated world internet access and Chile was rated 43(number of computers, broadband acces to the home, education amongst population to acctually use it etc) in the world and the closest i could remember was like 66.
      We can get very cheap brodaband from cable, adsl and Wireless, from many companies. Sweeden was number 1 in the world and the US was like 11 or 12.

      --
      "The quality of life is inversely proportional to the number of keys on your keyring."
    14. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Two things that may possibly affect this figure...
      1. Most registration forms have a dropdown with female as the first entry(alphabetical order).
      2. What does a null date default to? 12/31/1969, just about 35 years ago.


      I didn't catch in the article (yes, I read it) how they got these #s, i'm thinking that if this were an online form (which would account for the issues you mention) I think there'd be another issue, I doubt the # would be as low as 75%, after all, it's online.. I'd just like to know how they got these #s.

    15. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that you have my attention, plese continue to explain.....

    16. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by elasticwings · · Score: 0

      Hmm, is it also the 35-54 age range women that *want you to add 3-4 more inches*?

    17. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 4, Funny

      I actually go to the trouble of putting in funky information to throw off thier aggregate numbers. I like a 99 year old female with a grade school education and a 100k+/year salary. When they ask country of residence, the top two options are usually US then Afghanistan. It's just asking for Afghanistan.

      -B

    18. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      Funny about that; my last girlfriend has two computers hooked up to the net (one for her, and the other for me) and she did all the set up -other than buying the router, which I fucked up (by buying one that is too slow)...

      On my own, I just have the one computer and connection (however, I am smart enough to not have roommates ;-)).

    19. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by Elminst · · Score: 1

      As soon as "B" used the word "pedant", I knew it was a bot. Hardly anyone uses pedant in regular conversation, much less a teenager.

      --
      No unauthorized use. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
    20. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hehe.. Well statistics suck!

      In high school, I did a report for Driver's Ed class that showed the stats for various safety restraint systems (seat belts, air bags, etc) vs seat location (driver, passenger, back seat).

      According to the statistics, the safest way to travel was to drive a car while sitting in a baby carriage... nobody had ever died that way!

    21. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by ocie · · Score: 1

      No it's because we got accounts for our cats too. Didn't we poopsie? Yes we did, yes we did.

      --
      JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    22. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Two things that may possibly affect this figure...
      1. Most registration forms have a dropdown with female as the first entry(alphabetical order).
      2. What does a null date default to? 12/31/1969, just about 35 years ago.


      Very insightful (as opposed to "informative"), AC. Dropdowns are easily mis-selected due to focus issues, a concept which many web users don't understand. Sometimes I've modded comments incorrectly due to inattention.

      So now you know where those "moderators on crack" comments come from.

    23. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by fantastic · · Score: 1

      I happened to pass an ebay event at a hotel. most of the people there were in that age group and female.

      considering ebay has about 100 million registered users and nearly 1 billion listings ebay is one of the killer apps for the internet and is drawing new users every day

    24. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by gxv · · Score: 1

      Originally it was "Welcome to DALNet! Where the men are men, the women are men, and the teenage girls are undercover FBI Agents!". Old MOTD message on one of DALNet irc servers. Before it was DDoSed to death.

    25. Re:...internet access is highest among females 35- by bob65 · · Score: 1

      So, you think they used an online form to ask you if you have internet access?

  12. Oh yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These new comers with their DSL will never have the joy of crawling around at 2400 baud. Nothing but FTP or gopher.

    These kids today!

    1. Re:Oh yeah by lscotte · · Score: 1

      2400bps? ftp? gopher? That's all new stuff! I remember hanging out at BBS's with an acoustically-coupled 300baud modem. In those days we had no MNP or V.XX for error correction and compression, either.

      2400bps modems were a huge step forward. IIRC, they technically were not 2400baud though; they signalled at 600baud using quadrature encoding (QAM?). I don't remember all the details, and I'm too lazy to google for it. I'm sure somebody will google the answer and post it (and pretend like they knew it all along! :-) )

      --
      This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
  13. This isn't nice but... by Parsa · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's probably single woman trying to find a single man...

    --
    Abiit, excessit, evasit, erupit.
    1. Re:This isn't nice but... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Yes, but still after all this time, they haven't found me. Guess I'm going to make it a bit more easy:

      HEY! I'M OVER HERE!
      Now, if they still can't find me now, it's hopeless.

    2. Re:This isn't nice but... by globalar · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, look at the rise in personals on popular websites (/. included), dating services, and things like shopping on eBay (39,000 hits for "shoes"! - wonder whose wife is buying all those).

  14. Hope! by activesynapsis · · Score: 3, Funny
    Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet access is highest among females 35-54

    There's hope for the male geeks yet! (Assuming you don't still live in your parents' basement. You don't, do you?)

    1. Re:Hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attic :-(

    2. Re:Hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      euh... what's wrong with my parents basement?
      I like it here:)

    3. Re:Hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, they're 35-54. They can't really be picky at this point, can they...

    4. Re:Hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, they're 35-54.

      Some things that drives those broads crazy:

      • eat her pussy regularly

      • go out at least once a week

      • listen to their gripes about the bitches at her job
      Of course, those tips translate for younger chicks too.
  15. useless report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I ceased to take this seriously as soon as I realized that whoever wrote this POS didn't seem to understand that "internet" != "web".

    1. Re:useless report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, all five gopher users were left out of this report.

  16. If 75% of homes have access by spidergoat2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why am I still getting these freakin AOL disks?

    1. Re:If 75% of homes have access by manduwok · · Score: 1

      It's the great AOL coaster giveaway!

    2. Re:If 75% of homes have access by pdbaby · · Score: 1

      I have a vision of tomorrow: a world without costers. A world where our tabs will be labelled "Hot", "Cold" and "Coffee". You know, if we had tubes running from the coffee tap to our mouths, we wouldn't have to waste so many coasters (or clean so many cups)

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
  17. I'm not a statistic (unfortunately) by ziondreams · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I've recently dropped my phone line at home therefore dropping my home Internet access as well. Our household has 2 cell phones, I get plenty of Internet at work/college, and I can't quite afford broadband. I wonder how many others are in similar situations?

    --
    01000001 01011001 01000010 01000001 01000010 01010100 01010101
    1. Re:I'm not a statistic (unfortunately) by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      I don't have internet access at home... but that's mostly because of the $[2|6]00 startup cost associate with either Microwave High-speed or Satalite high speed internet access... that being what is available in my area

      We have a phone line, but dialup over our phone lines only gets us 28.8 on a *very* good day... usually it's around 14.4

      can't quite afford the setup cost

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    2. Re:I'm not a statistic (unfortunately) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They caught Saddamn, so this must be Osama!

      or Junis. (JonKatz I'm still waiting for my royalty check!)

    3. Re:I'm not a statistic (unfortunately) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How in the world can you afford 2 cell phones and not a land line? In my area, the cell phones would cost a LOT more than having a land line and be more hassle with randomly dropped calls.

    4. Re:I'm not a statistic (unfortunately) by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      I've recently dropped my phone line at home therefore dropping my home Internet access as well. ....I wonder how many others are in similar situations?

      I'd tell you but I don't have a connection anymore to the Internet...oh wait...

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  18. 2cd tech bubble coming? by DR+SoB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So it's 25% from the "great tech bubble", I wonder if that means that now would be a good time to start buying YHOO shares again? Although the tech bubble burst, it could almost be considered underrated, the issue was all the money thrown into the internet at one time caused the over-value, now it may be near corrected or even undervalued, so as the internet grows, so will tech stock.

    --
    Mod +5 Drunk
    1. Re:2cd tech bubble coming? by emc · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that means that now would be a good time to start buying YHOO shares again?

      Only if YHOO starts selling services related to Cats or Scrapbooking.

    2. Re:2cd tech bubble coming? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      That's true... but the other thing is... there was a lot of infrastructure laid during the "dot com" era so it may still take a while for the tech companies to recover. In other words, there may be overcapacity... When I say this, I'm not necessarily talking about telecom, networking, or related companies. The same applies to other areas of the internet. For example, there are probably "too many" web design companies and too many ISPs (that were all started during the boom). Will these companies be attractive in the near future? Probably not until there is more demand than supply.

      Having said this, some claim the stock market (and hence valuation of all companies in a capitalist society) is a ponzi-scheme and based on hype and speculation more than anything. If that is indeed true, then you can make money under any scenario. All you need is a ton of people investing (which will autmoatically increase the value).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  19. And yet... by ParadoxicalPostulate · · Score: 3, Interesting

    3 out of 4 people will not be able to tell you what bandwidth is.

    I'm wondering about this "easy to use" business. It's true that it will get us more users in the short run...but if the system was such that you would be forced to acquire at least some understanding of what you were doing, eventually you would get similar number of users, only they would be a little bit more aware of what is going on.

    It astonishes me that people don't care to learn about something they use every day, for perhaps hours on end.

    1. Re:And yet... by evilad · · Score: 1

      Come off it.

      9 out of 10 slashdotters can't give you a proper definition for bandwidth. Why would joe-sixpack end user even care?

    2. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most of us don't know much about a nuclear reactor but we still use one for hours on end, sometimes days on end

    3. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It astonishes me that people don't care to learn about something they use every day, for perhaps hours on end.

      Agreed... Especially when their ignorance could result in them being raided by the FBI because they apparently cracked into some major corporate network, etc.

    4. Re:And yet... by glpierce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      " 3 out of 4 people will not be able to tell you what bandwidth is."

      3 out of 4 people will not be able to tell you what frequency their phone uses.

      3 out of 4 people will not be able to tell you what DVD region they are in.

      3 out of 4 people will not be able to tell you what the RIAA is...or the MPAA...or the FCC...

      ...I think you get my drift.

      --
      G
    5. Re:And yet... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      But this so depends on what you mean by 'learn'. They learn to do what they want to / need to use the net for. They think they have sufficient understanding of this. Do they need more in-depth understanding? Do you take the time to learn about exactly how your computer's CPU is architectured?

    6. Re:And yet... by rm007 · · Score: 1

      It astonishes me that people don't care to learn about something they use every day, for perhaps hours on end.

      For better or worse, the only way that a technology can really take off to this extent is for it to become "easy to use". In the long run you get near ubiquitous diffusion not by having to be aware of something, but by it becoming invisible. How many drivers can repair their cars? How many people really undestand how the elecricity in their house works? When people can use something without caring about how it works, it takes off. Unfortunately, with computer technology, that leaves them open to ID theft, viruses etc. I suspect that the answer will not be educated users but more idiot proof systems to hand over to them.

      --


      I've finally got around to changing my sig
    7. Re:And yet... by leifm · · Score: 1

      Because they don't care, and computers are very dynamic. Once someone figures out how their DVD player and TV work they always know, it's a static UI. PCs on the other hand can change continually, and for those that use it for one specific thing, or just as a tool it remains confusing. I've spent a great deal of time over the last 8 years on a computer, and most of that time on the web. With that much time under my belt, and that fact that I care about computers/programming/internet I can adjust when things change a bit, be it the OS or a website redesign, whatever. Some guy/girl who works in a PC free environment just want to come home, check e-mail, read sports scores. They don't know or care about OS revisions and new website layouts and such, and PCs being a fairly new device with a dynamic interface confuse them. This will change I think as more and more people grow up with PCs, but for the time being we the 'elite' need to try to accomodate these people.

      And a lot of people who use a PC all day at work really only use one application, so as soon as they step out of that app they're lost.

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    8. Re:And yet... by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 5, Insightful


      What about driving? I put about 15,000 miles per year on my car, but I have no idea how an automatic transmission works. I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one.

      Because of this, I try not to get too riled up when I talk to people who get pop-ups and viruses, or don't know their CPU/System specs, or want to buy a P4 3.2GHz to play games with, but still use the onboard video. I wouldn't want my mechanic to constantly belittle me because I don't know how to adjust my own timing belt or the optimum gap on my spark plugs.

      We can't all be experts at *everything.* There's just too much technology we interact with on a daily basis. That's why it *is* the manufacturer's responsibility to produce "easy to use" systems. Otherwise, we'd all be sitting around 24-hours a day, reading the owner's manuals to our new DVD player's remote.

    9. Re:And yet... by SecGreen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> It astonishes me that people don't care to learn about something they use every day, for perhaps hours on end.

      Quick, answer these questions:

      How many tumblers are in the lock on your house/apartment door. How about in your car door? Your ignition?

      What voltage is on your home phone line? What's the ring voltage? What's the max ring current?

      What frequency is your favorite TV channel transmitted on? What is the bandwidth? Modulation scheme? How about the encoding for the IR your remote control sends to your TV to turn it on?

      If we required users of all these devices to understand them the way us "geeks" understand computers, no-one would use cars or telephones, watch TV, or lock their doors.

      People who understand things like computers often have a mistaken perception that understanding them is easy, and that everyone should. It's generally a position taken by people who want to belittle others (the "lusers") and make themselves feel better.

      --
      Dupe posts are /.'s tacit protest on the rights of users to time-shift content...
    10. Re:And yet... by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      > Do you take the time to learn about exactly how your computer's CPU is architectured?

      yes

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    11. Re:And yet... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Geeks dont realize that 3 out of 4 people dont care.

      I wouldnt ask a non-geek what their "upstream bandwidth" was, I'd ask them how they connect - over the telephone or cable, etc.. They know that..

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    12. Re:And yet... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I choose to view people who get viruses and pop-ups as equivalent to people who can't figure out how to check their oil and refill their washer fluid.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    13. Re:And yet... by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 2, Insightful


      >We can't all be experts at *everything.*

      I'm sorry, but not knowing what bandwidth is is like a driver not knowing what his speedometer measures. And heck, most people figure out how to set the time on their microwave or alarm clock.

      Why should it be any different with computers?

      Sure, we can't all be experts, but can we all not be drooling idiots at least?

    14. Re:And yet... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And yet, half the "geeks" out there can't tell me how CMOS works.

      They can write Perl and PHP, but ask them what a transistor is and their faces go blank.

      Then you ask the EE who designs low-level CMOS VLSI designs how the electrons move inside the transistors, and he probably gives a decent explanation, but if you ask him why, blank look.

      So you go talk to the physicist. Who can probably explain why the electrons move around the way they do.

      But I bet he can't write perl scripts.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    15. Re:And yet... by maximilln · · Score: 1

      I think what the original author was trying to emphasize was this:

      If you don't know the tumblers in the lock, the ring voltage of the phone, or the TV transmission frequency it doesn't really matter.

      If, however, you don't know about the workings of your computer operating system and you're any sort of intelligent nerd, you become an immediate and probable target for the rich script-kiddie down the street who has nothing better to do than sniff his local network packets and dream up new schemes to harass you.

      As people spend more time online and integrate the internet more closely into their lives the opportunity for practical jokes (ie. criminal harassment) increases as well. Unline practical jokes of decades past which faded with the passage of time and memory, the internet is very good at preserving a practical joke for years at a time thanks to Google and Yahoo!.

      Say it never happens. You don't have to believe me.

      --
      +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    16. Re:And yet... by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Yea, I'm in the same boat with my car, but I don't go around installing new mods to my engine each week. I also take my car into the shop 3-6 times a year for oil and other maintenance. The analogy just doesn't work beacuse normal users don't respect the machine or maintain it.

    17. Re:And yet... by GNUguy · · Score: 1

      "It astonishes me that people don't care to learn about something they use every day, for perhaps hours on end."

      Why is this so astonishing? If you look at this way, how many people can tell you how thier TV works, or how a radio works, or their car.. or even how the city pipes water into your home.

      Alot of people are not savy on technology of any kinda. People in our industry (tech industry) need to know these things to survice, and I also believe that if you are in this industry at all, its because you like to know how everything works =)

      -G

      --
      A man, a plan, a canal, panama
    18. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet I have to know the difference between various keys for any particular lock, so I can open said lock.

      I may not have to know how a spark plug works, but I have to know there is a difference between diesel and "standard" fuel when filling up my gas tank.

      So why is it too much to expect non-geek internet users to understand what bandwidth means (but not necessarily what it is), or why viruses and spyware are so rampent (not necessarily how they function)?

    19. Re:And yet... by Brad+Mace · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The difference is that you can use any of those things just as well without know how they work.

      People who *don't* understand computers also seem to have some misconceptions about their simplicity. They treat computers like a fancy TV, ignorant of the complexity and the risks. Not surprisingly, these people do nothing to maintain or protect their computer.

    20. Re:And yet... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does not knowing the voltage on my home phone line allow telemarketers to use my line to make more calls to other people?

      Does not knowing the frequency and bandwidth of my favorite TV channel mean that script kiddies can use my TV to knock TV stations off the air?

      Noone cares if you don't know these things because your lack of knowledge does not negatively affect other people.

      But when someone gets their brand new Dell on the internet and doesn't know not to hit 'no' when IE asks them if they want to install that cute plugin, or doesn't know not to open that cool new screensaver some nice person in argentina just sent them, or not to buy that discount v1aGr4 they just received a SPECIAL OFFER for means that everyone else has that much more spam in their inboxes every day, and that much more bandwidth is abused by script kiddies DDOSing each other...

      It is the same situation for driving cars. It is illegal to drive a car on public roads if you are completely ignorant about how a car works because your ignorance can clearly cause harm to other people. You don't have to know how an automatic transmission works, but you do need to know which pedal slows you down and which speeds you up.

      It would be fine if these people could be brought onto the internet in such a way that their lack of knowledge cannot bring any harm to other people's systems.

    21. Re:And yet... by landoltjp · · Score: 1
      if the system was such that you would be forced to acquire at least some understanding of what you were doing, eventually you would get similar number of users, only they would be a little bit more aware of what is going on.

      While I've always found the 'technocracy' argument to a double-edged sword (as overworked as that phrase may be), there are some frightening repurcussions behind the idea that people can just step up to a computer and have it do all these whizbang things.

      A friend of mine has a quote regarding this situation: "Accessibility is the yellow-brick road to mediocrity". While many of us nerds may have started the quest for Nerdvanna at a bright and early age, many more dove into the fray when technology became the "technology bandwagon".
      • How many people do you know are constant targets (and suppliers) of viruses to your (hopefully protected) systems?
      • How many of these people never adjusted that braindead Microslop convenience option to hide the extensions of known files?
      • How many people think that, because they can send email that they know how to use a computer?
      • How many people think that, because they can create a spreadsheet that they know how to program a computer?
      However unlikely, it is the hope that some of these new users may generate an honest and constructive curiosity about how the machines work, and they will be the ones to join the rest of the enlightened technical folk, following (and banging their heads against) the shining light of technological advance.

      If this is indeed the case, then let us also hope that the really dangerous/annoying ones get nailed by the technological "Bug Zappers" before they can do too much damage.
    22. Re:And yet... by rixstep · · Score: 1

      That's cool, and it's easy, but it's not quite correct. You do have to be somewhat technical to pass a drivers licence test, and you have to get your vehicle inspected too.

      None of that currently applies to the Internet - and look where it got us.

    23. Re:And yet... by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      3 out of 4 people come up with statistics off the top of their heads :)

    24. Re:And yet... by rixstep · · Score: 1

      It astonishes me that people don't care to learn about something they use every day, for perhaps hours on end.

      Be astonished - and fear meeting them on a real highway.

    25. Re:And yet... by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      On a tack different from the other posters in this thread...

      Almost anyone I know and consider a minimally competent computer user, can find out all of the information you just asked for in a matter of minutes if they find that they need it, as well as almost anything that would be considered "basic" knowledge on almost any subject they need information on. Conversely most of the non-competent computer users I have to deal with daily can't even be bothered to read the Message/Error/Ad box that pops up in the middle of thier screen, before clicking the OK button, and then calling me to "fix it" because they don't know what they did.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    26. Re:And yet... by pclminion · · Score: 1
      We can't all be experts at *everything.*

      But here on Slashdot, we certainly pretend to be.

    27. Re:And yet... by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Big Differences:
      -Your car can do ONE thing plus some comforts, your computer can do many many things. Therefore it behooves a user to learn how to apply the computer to many different tasks. The car.. you just drive it.

      -People don't expect to be able to call somebody on the phone and get walked through an oil filter change - a simple thing. But they do expect a help desk to be able to "just fix" their computer over the phone, automagically. Their ignorance causes their frustration as much as anything.. so that ignorance should be the first thing to fix.

      -You can't pull your computer into jiffy lube and have all the routine maintenance done for you while you read People Magazine. Therefore you need to learn how to do it yourself, or pay for a service that comes to you, like lawn care. Those are the 2 choices. Ignoring routine maintainence through ignorance is in no way excusable. Your worm ridden machine effects everybody! Same as an unsafe car.

      -If you're so ignorant you don't know the difference between the steering wheel and the other 4 wheels, you can't get a car, but if you think your monitor is your computer and your computer is your pentium hard drive you can still get a computer, yet you have no business owning one. I can forsee a day when people have to pass a netizens test just like a drivers test. Ignorance is EXPENSIVE. And there's no damn excuse for that level of ignorance.

      AFAIK, only in the USA is it cool to boast ignorance. I.e. - "Antivirus stuff, firewalls, I don't have time for that techie crap, can't you just make it work?" -- that's acceptable to most, but "Oil change, radiator fluid? Tread wear on my tires, I don't have time for that mechanic crap? Just fix it" Everybody knows THAT's unacceptable. WTF???
      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    28. Re:And yet... by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      Driving automatic is the equivalent of using Windows and AOL, n00b. /kidding!

    29. Re:And yet... by wfberg · · Score: 0

      Quick, answer these questions:

      How many tumblers are in the lock on your house/apartment door. How about in your car door? Your ignition?

      Care to tell me the number of pins on a PCI card? An AGP card? A slot-A cpu?

      What voltage is on your home phone line? What's the ring voltage? What's the max ring current?
      IIRC 60V, but tell me, what's the voltage on your VGA cable? And on your ps/2 keyboard? What's the maximum amount of current your mouse draws from USB?
      (Ring voltage is about 60V, I belief. Enough to be felt. Otherwise, low voltage.)

      What frequency is your favorite TV channel transmitted on? What is the bandwidth? Modulation scheme? How about the encoding for the IR your remote control sends to your TV to turn it on?
      Respectively channel 11, 8Mhz, Phase-alternating-line, and philips RC5 (off the top of my head). Note that the exact frequency of channel 11 doesn't matter, and that I only know the other stuff coz I'm a bit of a geek.

      Pray tell what the modulation on the PCI bus is though. How about the modulation on fast ethernet? And the bandwidth (in Hz) of firewire?

      If we required users of all these devices to understand them the way us "geeks" understand computers, no-one would use cars or telephones, watch TV, or lock their doors.
      We know what we need.

      You talk about not understanding cars; I distintcly remember having to take a test. It's not all that trivial. And if I had a quarter for every time even a family member of mine fudged something up w.r.t. their TV or (cell)telephone, I'd be a rich man. Or even for every time I tried to insert my key the wrong way up.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    30. Re:And yet... by hawkeesk8 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the original "And yet..." post was trying to belittle people who don't understand the Internet. I believe his point was to say that many people may have responded to the survey saying that they have Internet when in fact they don't because they really don't understand what the Internet *is* Maybe someone thinks that if they get CNN on TV then that is considered the Internet or the mere fact that they have a telephone means that they are on the Internet ... who knows ... never underestimate the ignorance of the masses.

    31. Re:And yet... by globalar · · Score: 1

      "We can't all be experts at *everything.*"

      Funny that some of the people who design said "easy to use systems" sometimes become victims of engineer's disease (Just because you know a lot about one or more things does not mean you know a lot about everything).

      It is good to be able to fiddle with (some)things, but it is better to be able to ignore details and get something else done.

    32. Re:And yet... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I agree, but I've got one comment:

      Microwaves are *hard*! We got a new microwave, which I didn't have an occasion to use until the other day. Took me like 10 minutes to figure out how to enter the time. I was really hungry at the time, too...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    33. Re:And yet... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I've come up with a pretty good counter-argument for the car analogy:

      Computers are different from cars. Understanding computers gives you a huge boost in productivity. For example, someone who doesn't know about popup-blockers and virus scanners are wasting a lot of time dealing with popups and viruses. Understanding how to adjust the timing belt on your car doesn't decrease the amount of time it takes to get from point A to point B. Thus, even if you just "want to get work done" it makes sense to learn about and understand your computer.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    34. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>-Your car can do ONE thing plus some comforts, your computer can do many many things. Therefore it behooves a user to learn how to apply the computer to many different tasks. The car.. you just drive it.

      Uhh, a computer computes. That's all it does.

    35. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably more like 99% of people. Most people incorrectly think that bandwidth is a measurement of data transfer rate.

    36. Re:And yet... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Your worm ridden machine effects everybody! Same as an unsafe car.

      So you equate crashing a workstation with the traumatic disintegration of a family of three in a high-speed collision?

      An unmaintained car can kill other people. A PC without virus protection can... what?

      However, beyond the terrifically different magnitude of potential damage, there is a more important reason computer-users shouldn't be licensed like drivers: jurisdiction.

      Nobody can get into a car accident with your without first being in the same nation and district. Therefore she must first come under control of the same government authorities as you.

      But networked computers don't respect national boundaries or even physical distance. An email worm can be spread about as effectively from Vienna or Bejing as Chicago. No law restricting who can use the internet can be effective unless it's globally enforced. And that won't happen.

    37. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..I think you get my drift. ...that 3 out of 4 people aren't worth the acids they are coded out of??

      hint: go look up DNA

    38. Re:And yet... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      3 out of 4 people won't even know what percentage 3 out of 4 is.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    39. Re:And yet... by toomuchPerl · · Score: 1
      Our last senior developer majored in physics.

      God, all I've got is some web development experience. I'm on the bottom of the totem pole.


      Where's that leave me? :P

      --toomuchPerl, with a battered ego

    40. Re:And yet... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      That's a given because you are getting into technical details at that point when asking about CPU/system specs. However, I highly doubt when asked what kind of car you have that you respond with "blue". I would think you respond with the model or the manufacturer. Ask a person what kind of computer they have and you will get "beige". I find it sad and annoying that people can spend $2k to $3k on a computer and not know what brand they bought. You just don't go out and buy a car and not even know if Ford or GM made it. A little bit of knowledge is expected since people fork out a lot of money for computers. I dont' think it's too much to ask for.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    41. Re:And yet... by Y0tsuya · · Score: 1

      I know you're saying that everyone has their own field of expertise. However the physicist can probably pick up perl by reading a "learn perl in 24 hours" book. But where are you going to find a "learn quantum mechanics in 24 hours" book? Truth is, learning how computers work and operating it is much easier than writing perl scripts, let alone VLSI design or solving quantum mechanics equations.

    42. Re:And yet... by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it have been easier to nuke your dinner first, THEN figure out setting the time? :)

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    43. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > So you equate crashing a workstation with the traumatic disintegration of a family of three in a high-speed collision?

      Analogies don't equate, they compare. The point was that most people don't realize that their PC can have any effect on others at all.

    44. Re:And yet... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I can learn perl in 24 hours, sure, but I won't be all that good at it.

      You can't learn the math of control systems in 24 hours (this is what I do for a living), but you can get as good at it as I am in roughly the same amount of time it takes to become a competent programmer (not in perl, just a competent programmer).

      Getting to the physicists level in quantum mechanics probably takes a bit longer, but then again, he probably has a PhD, so if you took that kind of time to study it, odds are you could get to it.

      The point is that none of these are intrinsically hard to do - learning the qualitative theories of quantum mechanics is very easy, learning how to hack out perl is very easy, learning basic gate-level design is very easy; you just have to spend some time at each, and I don't like to blame people for choosing to spend their time elsewhere.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    45. Re:And yet... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Analogies don't equate, they compare.

      Analogies are made with "like", equations are made with "same". Guess which he used?

  20. no big surprise by bl8n8r · · Score: 3, Funny

    ever been to shoes.com?

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  21. Hopes in other corners of the world by cda · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since I'm from Romania here we see this like:

    go to US plug your cable in the wall and the broadbad flows.

    Now this is something I envy you for. Low rate decent speed access. Since here a 64/128 kbit goes around $100-$150 and the minimum wage is around $75 monthly ... you do the math.

    But at least we cand get some online clients from US. The more ... the best

    1. Re:Hopes in other corners of the world by jlechem · · Score: 1

      My broadband comes at a price. A lot of people can't afford it and are still stuck on dialup. While not a toy of the rich, not everyone can afford broadband here quite yet.

      --
      Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
    2. Re:Hopes in other corners of the world by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I'd avoid Japan then. They have some really fast Internet connections and at a fractin of what we in the US pay.

  22. Re:TWO WORDS! by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm, posting about wanting online soap operas, on Slashdot. You're being ironic, aren't you?

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  23. Inevitable by Mr.+Certainly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can we not be "connected"? Its become narly manditory (if not already so) for secondary schools to teach internet skills. It's only a natural thing to have the students ask their parents for an internet connection: "We need to do our projects" is often the case. Granted, teens do use it for many other things, but that's not the point. How many state websites have money saving online forms for Car Registration, etc? If you do it via hardcopy, you often have to pay X number of dollars to process it. But it's less online more than not. Want more information about a product or service? Check out the company's website! Want to play the latest game or get a new pc part? You better have the internet, since the company may not have bothered to send the correct drivers with the product, check their online driver download section! You might be lucky if they have an option for you to buy the update CD and pay for shipping for a 6-8 week later delivery. It's becoming more and more difficult to use the "I don't have internet" excuse. It's not a merely sending email and for up and coming companies to use the web. It's invaded our everyday lives. For better or worse, we need to conform or perish.

    1. Re:Inevitable by autophile · · Score: 1
      How can we not be "connected"? Its become narly manditory (if not already so) for secondary schools to teach internet skills.

      ...but apparently not to teach English skills. :P

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    2. Re:Inevitable by rixstep · · Score: 1

      narly manditory (if not already so) for secondary schools to teach internet skills

      Yeah, I hear they're cracking down on casual dyslexia too.

  24. Hi ASL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Got any naked pics to share?

    KTHXBYE

  25. As if teens didn't have enough to worry about... by MooseByte · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet access is highest among females 35-54."

    And you thought mom was busy balancing the checkbook online....

    Now all you teenagers now get to face the fact that 'HotChick69' you've been eagerly getting busy with in the chat rooms may in fact be just down the hall.

    The horror... the horror...

  26. Issues by torinth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    #1) This is a press release. It is in the interest of the Nielsen group to exaggerate these figures. The more people who they show as on the internet, the more advertisers who will buy their data.

    #2) The data was collected using random-digit dialing. Obviously, the people who don't have phones are more likely to not have internet access too. I wouldn't discount this factor.

    #3) It's very vague what question they actually asked people. Does it include "is there a library within 50 miles of you that has internet access?" Given their natural bias towards inflating the numbers, you can't discount them incorporating those results into their totals.

    It's great if more people are online, but these figures and percentages need to be taken with a grain of salt.

    1. Re:Issues by Nakito · · Score: 4, Informative

      #2) The data was collected using random-digit dialing. Obviously, the people who don't have phones are more likely to not have internet access too. I wouldn't discount this factor.

      Good point, but it's already accounted for in the survey. If you look at the definition of the base "population" (i.e., the denominator in the ratio), Nielsen defines it as "Total persons in the U.S. aged 2 and above, living in households equipped with a landline phone." So they are saying, in effect, that three-quarters of telephone-equipped households have online access.

      Also remember that the national Do Not Call registry has an exception for telephone surveys, so Nielsen can still call just about anybody to conduct these surveys. The more interesting question is whether the very small subset of people who actually agree to participate are typical of the population as a whole.

    2. Re:Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to say "/me dons tinfoil hat"

    3. Re:Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What tin foil hat. It would be plain out shitty business if they didn't inflate their numbers. That's what people do. You probably do it on your resume. It's not lying, it's just making the numbers look pretty.

    4. Re:Issues by Cthefuture · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The more interesting question is whether the very small subset of people who actually agree to participate are typical of the population as a whole.

      From personal experience I'd say no. I'm willing to bet it's 35-54 year old females.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    5. Re:Issues by elb · · Score: 1

      #2) The data was collected using random-digit dialing. Obviously, the people who don't have phones are more likely to not have internet access too. I wouldn't discount this factor.

      True. However, random-digit telephone surveys are one of the most widely-used and accurate survey / sampling methodologies available. The proportion of american households with telephones is around 95%. Not perfect, but it is known, and thus is accounted for. There are huge bodies of statistical theory built up around correcting for the deficiencies and biases that are implicit in this sort of survey. For example, here's a detailed description of the methodology used for the Pew Internet & American Life survey, which was also a random-digit dial survey. That doesn't ensure that N/N used similar methodological rigor, but just provides an example that people are aware of these problems, and some of them try to correct for them.

      Finally: yes, according to these stats, women ages 35 - 54 have the highest rate of penetration (spare me any forthcoming penis jokes, thank you) at 81.7%. But the penetration rate for men of the same age group is only SLIGHTLY less -- 80.2%. I can't find the margin of error, but unless N/N is insanely rigorous and sampled 5,000+ people, the difference between men and women is probably within the margin of error (generally 2 - 4%).

  27. Come on, people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Work harder! Wire those houses! You wanna get beaten by a bunch of middle-aged women? Huh? I CAN'T HEAR YOU!

    You! Why aren't you on IRC?

    You! BitTorrent seed NOW.

    Christ, and you call yourselves nerds...

  28. More statistical bull by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Their method of counting internet access is flawed. Their method would count me four times, and my wife three.

    And then you count my mother-in-law and while she has "access", she has never been online. Her access is just to get e-mail.

    So there you have it. 6 accounts out of 8 counted that are not valid. How many more of them are not valid as well?

    1. Re:More statistical bull by kacp · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that 75% of your accounts AREN'T valid...

      --
      To write a haiku - all you need is the correct - number of syli...
    2. Re:More statistical bull by crumley · · Score: 1

      How is getting (non-local) email not "online"? What internet related activities would you consider use to define being "online"?

      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    3. Re:More statistical bull by zx75 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just an aside to your statement (which is indeed valid), your grandmother is in fact 'connected' even though you do not regard her as such. Email does require internet access, and though she may not 'surf the web' she is indeed connected to it. Limited usage is still validly classified as usage.

      For example, if I own a radio, but only turn it on to check the weather for 30 seconds each morning, I would still be classified as someone who 'listens to the radio' though the time spent is negligable (sp?).

      --
      This is not a sig.
    4. Re:More statistical bull by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

      They are valid, but multiple accounts with the same person are not that many more people connected to the internet.

      I have primary and secondary and tertiary access methods.

      I also have a total of 5 e-mail accounts right now. does that make me 5 people? But that is how they are counting me.

    5. Re:More statistical bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't counting accounts. It's a telephone survay. If you really thing Neilsen is that stupid and you're so much smarter, I've got bad news for you.

    6. Re:More statistical bull by hng_rval · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clearly, you did not RTFA.

      They call people and ask them if they have internet access. They would only call you once, hence you would only be counted once.

      True, these statistics do not count how long someone is online. If your mother-in-law checks her email and is online for 5 minutes a day to do so, she is counted the same as someone who is on for 8 hours a day surfing the web. However, your mother-in-law still has internet access at home, so I believe it is valid that she is counted.

      These statistics are VERY accurate. They really tell us that 75% of the people with phones have Internet access. There are some people who can't afford phones who probably don't have Internet access, and there are people like me who don't have a home phone but do have Internet access that wouldn't be included in the survey (assuming they don't call cell phones).

      However, these numbers probably cancel each other out to the point of being a statistical nusiance. 75% is most likely very accurate.

      --
      Thank you Mario! But our princess is in another castle!
    7. Re:More statistical bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their method of counting internet access is flawed. ... 6 accounts out of 8 counted that are not valid. How many more of them are not valid as well?

      Did you read the article? They didn't call ISP's or mail providers to ask how many accounts they have, they telephoned a sample population of random #s from the telephone book and asked the households whether or not they have Internet access.

      Honestly-- did you really think they asked the major e-mail providers how many different users they had? RTFA. Mod parent -1, clueless.

    8. Re:More statistical bull by rixstep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      she has never been online. Her access is just to get e-mail

      Uh - hello? Flawed: what's the all-time killer app?

      Otherwise I agree. 'There's lies, goddamned lies, and statistics', said your author Mr Clemens I believe.

    9. Re:More statistical bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. of which.... by Omega1045 · · Score: 1
    "Over 200 million U.S. residents now have access to the internet at home"

    Of which 199 million got online just so they could sell and/or buy lawn trolls on eBay.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  30. Your Mom Jokes? by Sylink · · Score: 4, Funny

    Your mom is so fat she takes up the largest age/gender group of internet users in the United States!

    1. Re:Your Mom Jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Mom is so fat that a single beaver shot jpeg floods a binaries newsgroup...

  31. interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...internet access is highest among females 35-54.

    Arent they also the ones still using dialup though?

  32. US isn't the most inexpensive by ParadoxicalPostulate · · Score: 1


    If you search past Slashdot archives, you will see discussions where /. users are pining over the low low rates in Sweden and some areas of Japan.

    Here's an interesting report (Adobe Reader required).

    1. Re:US isn't the most inexpensive by cda · · Score: 1

      Agree with the fact that US is not the most inexpensive but considering that almost any provider gives you a 2 hop away from the major backbones is something to appreciate.

  33. Quite a Jump by jbrader · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps the real story isn't that the percentage of Americans online at home has grown about 25% in the last 4 years. I think the fact that we've gone from almost nobody being online in the early nineties to having 3/4 of the population on the net in only a decade is the really impressive figure.

    --
    You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    1. Re:Quite a Jump by rixstep · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and in thirty years we've come from MITS Altairs to home computers with keyboards - but they work about as well.

    2. Re:Quite a Jump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you try playing UT2K4 on an Altair . . . better practice your switch flipping, cuz it must take a lot of flipping just to calculate the splash screen, let alone load a map.

    3. Re:Quite a Jump by spun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm, it is a big thing. I googled 'history of the telephone' and read a bit from some sites. Bell invented the telephone in 1875 and patented it in early 1876. Telephone usage didn't begin to get big until the late 1890s, and by 1910, there were over a million telephone users hooked into the Bell system. Bell had a clear cut patent, but he had to spend a lot of time and resources defending it in court. The Internet was developed by the US Defense Agency, then built up by Acedemia, then adopted by Business and developed in a very competetive, free market style. I have absolutely no idea the point I am trying to make.

      Oh, yeah. These things always go in S curves. Curve starts out flat, as initial research is done and infrastructure is built up. Curve starts to vear up as early adopters jump on board. Once everyone knows it's a good thing, the curve goes nearly verticle for a while, then it tapers off once it hits 80-90 percent adoption. So don't forget all the initial ARPANET stuff in your timeline, which started in 1969. And it means the Internet has almost reached maturity here in America. Anyone have usage numbers for other countries?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  34. Access does not mean they use it .. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have access to my my neighbours Porsche ( and keys ), still I won't use it.. Having access and using it is something completely different.

    BS Research Inc.

    1. Re:Access does not mean they use it .. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a fucking retarded analogy. Unless you have his keys and his permission to drive the thing, you don't have access to it any more than I have access to the contents of the DOI's indian trust treasury--it's probably (at least remotely) possible to take it, but if you tried, you'd go to jail for a long, long time, or at least get a good ass-kicking, depending on the race and build of your neighbor.

      Generally, something is not considered to be "accessible" if you can't acquire it without getting imprisoned or getting the shit kicked out of you.

      Not that that has any relevance to the article. I'm just saying.

    2. Re:Access does not mean they use it .. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...

      That's great and all. But, using your neighbor's $50,000+ automobile without permission (whether you have access or not), and using a $20-60 a month Internet access point, are vastly different.

      Even using your neighbor's $20-60/month Internet access is vastly different.

      If you insist on making analogies, at least try to keep them somewhat relevant...

  35. You just got modded up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    +592 vagina.

  36. Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet by Le+Marteau · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet access is highest among females 35-54.

    Why is that interesting? We all know that females like to yak it up, and the net is a natural for them. It's not like its all that difficult to get on the net. You don't exactly have to know how to operate a slide rule, or be into anime, in order to slap an AOL coaster into your machine and give them your credit card number.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
  37. Hello desktop toys by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From what I've seen through my work, it's exactly that 35-54 group that are keeping me in business. I have seen more junk running on these older ladies computers than I even knew was out there. A cat the falls down the screen, walks out a little cat door has been the highest offender. But other things such as "cute" screensavers (likely spyware), comet cursor's "cute" pointers and the like are just as popular.

    1. Re:Hello desktop toys by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      "A cat the falls down the screen, walks out a little cat door has been the highest offender."

      Hey now, I loved that one (or a close relative) when I was 25. First encountered it on SuSE 7.0. Oh, the things you'll try when you're depressed. (The cat, not Linux.)

      No, I don't have a point. Sorry!

  38. Re:Top 10 advertisers... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    I see a ton of ads for Classmates but I wonder how they make their money... by getting people's e-mail and then spamming them perhaps?

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  39. Isn't it funny? Stats from my bum by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's strange that only 70% of homes in the USA have an Internet capable computer, yet 75% of homes have the Internet?

    Maybe WebTV is an explanation, but it could be something more sinister. Perhaps these figures are wrong?

    I'd bet the figures are wrong, as I've just made up the "70%" stat. Sorry if I had alarmed you there for a moment...

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Isn't it funny? Stats from my bum by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I know a handful of folks with no PCs, yet have Xboxes or PS2s that are online.

      Besides, the question read "access" to internet, be it through a local cafe, library, school, friend, grandparent, etc..

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  40. Why now? by CosmicDreams · · Score: 1

    If I were to guess, I'd say it is due to competition between market forces. Here in the midwest (specifically St. Louis), Juno/Netzero is a popular option for cost savers. While gamers either decide to pay the Charter titan, or the SBC titan for high speed access.

    For me, my college life was redefined by high speed internet access. When we moved down here it was hard to adjust to not haveing interent access. Nearly all of my communication with family memebers is done by cell phones or IM now.

    --
    Go Gusties
  41. But the cable modem DSL crowd is low by superpulpsicle · · Score: 0

    There could be a cazillion more users, but they need to be on broadband otherwise they are slowing everybody down.

    I don't want to be kazaaing off someone on a 56k modem.

    I don't want to be playing network games and can't kill someone in a FPS cause their ping is so bad they skip around.

    1. Re:But the cable modem DSL crowd is low by craXORjack · · Score: 1
      There could be a cazillion more users, but...

      What the hell is a cazillion? Is it higher than a gazillion or lower than a kajillion?

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  42. 200 millions has access? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow - I must be the other millions that want to have broadband that couldn't. Because the city that I'm in - Pacbell is too cheap to put a remote terminal for DSL.

    Sometimes I wonder where they get these "200 millions" number from

  43. Online vs not online by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    Having access is not the same as using it. She knows how to get e-mail because I set it up. I tried to walk her through going online one, just to get a e-card I sent her. I had to do it for her, because it made no sense to her.

    It raises the question, what level of usage equates to "online"?

    1. Re:Online vs not online by crumley · · Score: 1

      Yes, it raises the question of what it means to be "online". Personally, I think that sending and receiving email should count as being online. Sending email across the internet is using the internet. Obviously there's quite a bit more out there that you can do online past email. I think that any use of internet-related services should count, otherwise it is too hard to decide where to draw the line.

      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
  44. Re:computers at library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's where I see most of the people getting on the computer.

    kids= games
    girls=email
    homeless=place to hangout
    richpeople=to cheap or poor(stocks) to buy a computer
    poorpeople=looking for jobs.
    unemployed=see poor people
    me= all of the above

  45. Re:Top 10 advertisers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, actually, they had a decent business plan from the start. They get you to sign up (free), and you can see everyone else who has signed up. BUT, if you want to talk to them (ie send them email), you've got to subscribe! They've been doing quite well, and the more free people they get to sign up, the more their service is worth.

  46. Your are probably right in counting by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    My mother-in-law, though it is a fine line.

    That still leaves 5 accounts counted that are duplicates. Oh, and 4 of those didn't exist last year, so there is your growth.

  47. Sex and the City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that show is the main contributor.
    Women like to dream and they see themselves as Carrie Bradshaw with an Apple laptop.

  48. EverQuest by WyerByter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wasn't there a story here a couple weeks ago, that stated the largest group playing MMORPG was that same group.

    --

    This signiture copied from somewhere.
  49. Re:computers at library by prostoalex · · Score: 1

    homeless=place to hangout

    Where do they hangout? realtor.com?

  50. And in related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Statistical analasis is showing that despite the rise in internet usage in the United States, the actual number of people who know how to use the internet has declined steadily.

  51. Bad analogies. by metalhed77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a fundamental difference between computers and these things. Computers are interacted with on a low level. I've used locks my whole life and will never have to open one up. A computer is so complex that even the simplest tasks can cause problems. For instance, few people have a decent grasp of the directory structure. Yes, the simple directory structure. This is a constant problem when they want to open a file with something other than the program that saved it and that program has a different default open folder.

    Your examples would make sense if say, the ring voltage on your phone had to be randomly calibrated to fluctuating levels manually (silly isn't it?), but it doesn't. The problem isn't with users , but with computers themselves. Computers NEED to be learned or need to be simpler.

    --
    Photos.
    1. Re:Bad analogies. by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      There's a fundamental difference between computers and these things. Computers are interacted with on a low level. I've used locks my whole life and will never have to open one up. A computer is so complex that even the simplest tasks can cause problems.

      And should it be like that? No.

    2. Re:Bad analogies. by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Computers NEED to be learned or need to be simpler.

      You know, I just realized that even though it looks like there's not much progress on this front, that what you explained is happening, albeit slowly. Take a look at Mac OS X or WinXP. The new versions have Documents folders for everyone, music folders, shared folders, website folders to host your own site from, Applications folders, pictures and movies folders.. If you're completely brainless and just want your computer to allow you to do what most people use them for these days, mail, web, taking the pictures off of your digital camera, i'd say WinXP and OS X have got it pretty much nailed. Separate users, separate home directories, separate everything, and no real access to the base system. I guess all we need to do away with is hardware conflicts and crashes and make sure peripherals install easily and even the biggest idiot you know will be able to use a computer. Now all we've got to do is clean up the internet... Man, I could really go on with this post, but i'll save the rest of this rant for a more appropriate time.

      -matt

    3. Re:Bad analogies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up you asshole, those people are the reason we exist. If you dont like it then find another occupation. I for one got in this business because I like helping people. (and of course by addiction to logic problems but that is for another thread).

  52. Women Can't Vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was just some show on HBO. You know, like Carnivale, and the Suprano's.

  53. These figures are impressive by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    These figures are impressive but they seem fishy to me. If I'm not mistaken this overtakes cable/satellite/etc television (anyone have the tv figures handy?) I find that hard to believe. I can't think of a single person who has internet but no cable television (not counting students and people moving/transiting/etc)

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    1. Re:These figures are impressive by Animats · · Score: 1

      I have DSL but no cable, but then I'm not into TV.

    2. Re:These figures are impressive by Samhaine · · Score: 1

      I didn't for about six months. If it weren't for the wife, I probably still wouldn't, considering all I watch are a couple of things on Adult Swim.

    3. Re:These figures are impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Shield, man. Quality show.

    4. Re:These figures are impressive by genner · · Score: 1

      I had cable modem several years without cable TV. :)

    5. Re:These figures are impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have several friends who have no TV, but who have broadband Internet. They generally just download anything they want to watch and arrange their couches around their 19" computer monitors.

    6. Re:These figures are impressive by sakyamuni · · Score: 1

      I have a cable modem, but not cable TV service.

      I'm neither a student nor in any other temporary or only semi-permanent housing situation. I just don't watch TV.

    7. Re:These figures are impressive by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 1

      The only reason IMO to have cable/pay TV is live sports, Series can be bought on DVD with no adds and the ability to watch them when you please or even d/led from the net (shhhhh you didn't hear that from me). I recently started d/ling SG-1 from the net as channel 4 here in the UK schedules it at something like 15:00 on Sunday, I would rather be out hiking or spending time with friends then watching TV at this time.

    8. Re:These figures are impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wife and I had cable modem access with digital cable. We realized we were more likely to spend quality time with each other, family, and friends if we ditched the cable TV. We now only use our TV for a twice a month movie night. We kept the broadband access because it is neccessary for me to continue to learn skills for my job, and it is very good for her as a student.

  54. Those analogies arent very good by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Better analogies:

    How many digits are in a phone number?
    How much gas does your tank hold?
    What's your car's top speed?
    How many minutes are on your cell phones calling plan?
    How much milk comes in a typical jug?

    1. Re:Those analogies arent very good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      7

      13 gallons

      120 mph

      500

      1/2 gallon

      Did I win?

    2. Re:Those analogies arent very good by gargan · · Score: 1

      i think some of the replies to this post are missing the point. these are actually the better questions for the analogy, imho. people dont know exactly how their telephones or cars work, but they learn what they need to know to use them the way they want to.

      however i think the point should be made that these things had to be TAUGHT to people, and it wasnt that hard to learn. some people just arent inclined towards electronics, while they may be brilliant in other areas. i think technology has too much of a bad name. people just hear the word 'technology' and go into luser mode.

      computers are really too distinct a field to be put into such categories at this point. wait a generation and people will know as much about their computers as they do their cars and cell phones; they still wont know how they work, but they'll know enough to use them without major trouble.

      with cars, if you know what you're doing there's no reason to take it to a mechanic except for major overhauls. same with a computer. i think cars and computers are a good analogy. you know how to drive, you know how to change a tire and change your oil, but most people dont know much more than that, except for the people that like cars and drive them and fix them as a hobby. same with computers.

      --
      Emory: Uh..we're still..beta testing that.
      Oglethorpe: What you're testing is me and my patience!
  55. Re:At their prime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Women have their best orgasms when getting head. Are you prepared to go down on her? Didn't think so.

  56. Cupid Dot Com Etc... by Jubii · · Score: 1

    I can't help but wonder if the increase of internet users, with most being in the female 35 and up range, has anything to do with the rise of match making web sites like cupid.com in the last few years. Seems like I've read somewhere that the US population has 5 million more females than males, which could lead to more women looking for Mr. Right on the PC.

    --

    I planned on inserting something witty here but never got around to it.
  57. Re:At their prime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Sir,

    You're a fucking idiot. Please prevent yourself from propogating your flawed genes to subsequent generations. While suicide is the preferred method, it is expected that you, at the very least, refrain from engaging in the act of copulation.

    Even over the Internet.

    Even for ten seconds.

    Regards,

    Humanity

  58. Re: Interestingly, among age/gender groups, intern by thelexx · · Score: 1

    Guess I'll throw my karma in with yours since that's EXACTLY what I immediately thought. Another way to communicate. Women like it. Shocker.

    --
    "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  59. Re:Top 10 advertisers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they actually have a TV show. No, I'm not kidding.

  60. Re:TWO WORDS! by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1


    It isn't ironic, because it is a known fact women don't care about love triangles between Natalie Portman, a Beowulf cluster, and Yoda.

    --
    Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  61. internet penetration by trick-knee · · Score: 1

    Table 2: Nielsen//NetRatings Internet Access Penetration (U.S., Home)

    well, duh. no wonder it's highest among women.

    1. Re:internet penetration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by the high amount of homphobic trolls (GNAA et al.) on Slashdot, I would've thought the penetration rate was highest among males.

  62. ...internet access is highest among females 35-54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based upon some live XXX cam sites I've been too (pop up windows of course) I believe it.

  63. Good definition of "Technology" by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

    Anything which has a user's manual which we try not to have to read.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  64. In rekated news... by pjt48108 · · Score: 1

    How does this relate to any increase in compromised Windows machines out there? ;-)

    --
    Mmmmmm... Bold, yet refreshing!
  65. I agreed with you, you should read my post. by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    That's why I say that either people need to learn more or computers need to be simpler.

    Would you mind reading my words in their entirity next time? I'd caution you to be more careful before you go about using such derisive language.

    --
    Photos.
  66. That's cos by rixstep · · Score: 1

    internet access is highest among females 35-54

    That's cos females 35-54 have finally figured out you can have a 'verbal chat electronically' without getting pregnant.

  67. terrible, terrible analogies by boarder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does your lack of knowledge about the number of tumblers in your door lock make it easier for a thief to crack? No. Will I ever, EVER need to know how many tumblers or even that there are tumblers in order for me to use a lock? No. The exact same questions can be asked about your other stupid analogies.

    In the past couple weeks I've had to act as phone support for friends trying to configure their IP address to use their network. To even USE a computer for what it is designed you need training. I can't tell you how many times my friends who use computers everyday have tried to email me an mp3 and have only sent their winamp playlists... or told me all of their files were deleted when Word or Excel couldn't find a file that was in the recent docs list.

    These are basic tasks that can't be performed without knowledge of how the computer works. BASIC tasks. Do you need a manual to use your phone, TV, or remote? No. Do you need a manual to program phone numbers in memory, add new devices to a remote, hook up 20 cables for a home theatre system? Yes (for non-geeks). Advanced tasks are the only times when you need training. Basic tasks for a computer require training. If you don't know the modulation scheme for your TV or the ring voltage of your phone, can a hacker come in and destroy it? No. Just using a computer opens it up for malicious activity.

    Even worse is the analogy people use with car engines. Sure, I don't know what the tension is supposed to be on my old cable clutch, or how much pressure is in the hydraulic clutch... but does that hinder my ability to use it how it was designed? No. Can you just put a 12 year old in the driver seat and expect that kid to a) know how to operate the vehicle, and b) not kill people when they do? No. You have to be trained to use a car for its basic function to be usable. Same with a computer. Its basic function is complex and requires knowledge to use correctly and responsibly.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
    1. Re:terrible, terrible analogies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like your friends are presenting you with an opportunity. Charge them and stop griping.

  68. 95% countrywide ADSL coverage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  69. Why female is more? by sunheshan2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember that many prior surveys said men use Internet than women do. Women are more "computer anxious" than men. But this survey has a different results. Why?

  70. Bzzt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. You lose.

    How many digits are in a phone number?
    Your answer: 7
    Correct answer: 11

    How much milk comes in a typical jug?
    Your answer: 1/2 gallon
    Correct answer: 1 gallon

    Answers given apply to USA only.

  71. It's all about eBay by realmolo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work for a cable ISP in a town populated with mostly older people (retirement age and up). And I swear, they ALL buy/sell stuff on eBay. They all bought digital cameras to take pictures of the stuff they are selling on eBay. They all upgraded from dial-up so they could bid faster on eBay. In fact, retired people dig eBay so much, I'd bet that many of them would trade their Social Security and Medicare for high buyer/seller ratings. We could cut the federal deficit by billions! So, that's my platform. Vote realmolo in 2004. Contributions accepted via PayPal.

  72. Can anyone say... by PHanT0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Cougar?

  73. I live in my parents basement you insensitive clod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh the pain.. it hurts where my heart should be.

  74. Re:As if teens didn't have enough to worry about.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incest is not good, not good. Do your best to keep it in the family.

  75. Re:As if teens didn't have enough to worry about.. by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1

    Duh. The '69 is the year she was born. WTF were *you* thinking?

  76. i wonder... by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

    if most of those users are on dial-up.
    If 3/4 of the US population had broadband, the prices would most likely drop. I'm tired of paying $40/mo for cable modem service. DSL is not much cheaper and a lot slower than cable modem.

    1. Re:i wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll get broadband when I don't have to sign a contract. Fuck contracts and fuck subscriptions.

  77. Cell Phones by ziondreams · · Score: 1

    It's not that I cannot afford a land line...I can't yet afford broadband. I live in a very urban area and very rarely travel to rural areas, so cell phone coverage isn't a concern for me. I dropped my land line recently simply because it made no sense for me to have 2 cell phone lines as well as a land line, especially when most of my friends/family called me on the cells.

    --
    01000001 01011001 01000010 01000001 01000010 01010100 01010101
  78. To the Pinhead who Moderated me as a Troll by Le+Marteau · · Score: 0, Troll

    That was flamebait, not a troll.

    This is a troll:

    You are an idiot.

    Thank you.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
  79. What else do the old bags have to do? by robtT · · Score: 1

    Could there be a correlation between the statement that single women in that age group have a tough time finding a husband and women of that age group are proportionally more connected to the Internet? I think maybe not.

  80. 4-year old census data? Figure should be 72.2% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder why they're comparing current access to 4-year old Census data. Using current Census Bureau population estimates 72.2% of Americans are on-line. Not a big difference, but let's be accurate here.

    On the other hand, if they're not smart enough to get the Census data right, how much can we trust their research?

  81. That's because the girls are running servers... by pr0ntab · · Score: 4, Funny

    and not just browsing for pr0n.

    it's called PARTICIPATION man. There's only so much portforwarding you can do.

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  82. But you are by bluGill · · Score: 1

    You are a statistic. In the case of americans with internet access you are either in the 75% group, or the 25% group if you are an american. Of course if you live in some other country you aren't part of that statistic, but you are still part of the world internet useage ones.

    In the case of your phone, you are part of the growing segment that has dropped the land line phone for cell phone only. I'm part of that group too, but a case of skewed statistics, I have a land line connected to nothing because I'm required to have it to get DSL.

  83. Re:And yet...Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speak for yourself...I know everything!

    GeeK GoD!

    Well almost..still don't know what sex is like?

    Darn... gonna have'ta fix that.

    Any babes want to work on a new science project with me?

  84. Welcome by Gorffy · · Score: 1

    "Welcome to the real world. here's your computer, your xDSL/cable modem and a coffee maker. Have fun"

  85. More importantly: by jcsehak · · Score: 1

    Where does your tap water come from?

    Where does your electricity come from? Okay the power company. But how do they get it?

    Where do they get or how do they grow/raise your food, and how long is it in trucks and/or warehouses before it gets to the grocery store?

    Where does your poop go after you flush it?

    Funny how the things that were most important not too long ago (where we get our food, heat in winter, what to do about waste) have become givens.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:More importantly: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My poop goes to the poopy fairy!

  86. Re:WTF R U GOING ON ABOUT?!!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK!!!!!

  87. Re:Ladies & Gentleman, We Got HIM!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SLURP SLURP SLURP!

  88. Re:Geeze Louise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if I had noted the temporal relationship without implying a causal one, that post would have been factually correct and not flamebait?!!!

  89. They say statistics are like bikinis: by Kiyooka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What they reveal are suggestive.

    What they hide are critical.

  90. yr mama's so fat: by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    - the telephone company gave her her own area code! - she has little fat women orbiting around her! - her blood types Ragu! - etc.

  91. Doubtful by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I find these numbers a bit hard to believe. I'd much rather see how many people have personal e-mail accounts than "access to the internet". If I regularly visit the library or the mall and have once or twice browsed the web on one of those public kiosks - does this mean I have access to the Internet? I think according them it's a yes.

    There are 4 people living in my house. I definitely have access to the internet, my wife doesn't care about computers and my kids are too young to understand it. So in our house it is 1 out of 4 people, and I know people who do not have any kind of Internet access in their home because they don't even own a computer.

    So I'm a bit skeptical about these numbers. I'm guessing there is probably about 200 million actually capable of using the internet in this country (of the whole population, some are too young, some too old, some are unable for other reasons - ill (mentally or otherwise), in jail, etc.).

  92. It's taking a while by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    because they're developing Internet2 and Internet3 at the same time. They'll release one per Christmas.

  93. Females 35-54 by z00z · · Score: 2, Funny
    Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet access is highest among females 35-54.

    This should be expected since this is precisely the age group that is willing to go out with the average 20-year old slashdot geek.

  94. Nor are yours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many digits are in a phone number? What country? What area code (where applicable)?

    How much gas does your tank hold? Gallons, litres, or imperial litres? And does it matter?

    What's your car's top speed? How often you like to see cherries in the rearview?

    How many minutes are on your cell phones calling plan? The representatives don't even know this with some companies.

    How much milk comes in a typical jug? What's a jug? Who buys milk in a jug? And again what country? Pint, Litre, Half-Gallon, Gallon, 2 Gallon.

    Assinine at best, try again.

    1. Re:Nor are yours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asinine. One s. Remember it. Although maybe you were likening him to someone's buttocks...

  95. 35-54-35 by kendoka · · Score: 1

    "Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet access is highest among females 35-54."

    So all our moms are downloading porn?

  96. It's odd [was Re:Top 10 advertisers...] by tcopeland · · Score: 1

    that this was modded off-topic - it's a direct quote from the article. Ah well.

  97. A Jump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is quite a jump.

    The 51% figure was from an actual government census, whereas the 75% figure was from an independent company. I don't know which to exactly trust, but it is certainly a separate type of survey.

  98. Oh be a little bit more fair by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    The filesystem is simple and crucial. People do not know it. I never made a value judgement. You made the inference regarding my values.

    --
    Photos.
  99. SWMBO by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

    My geekgirl wife read this thread, smiled and said:

    We're taking over the world, dear.

  100. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was able too tell 'b' was the bot right away(in the first four lines). The various * - * repeated regular expressions were a dead give away. Turning test failed. They should make shure to include mistakes, extra letters accidentally pushed the corrected later, and other junk IRC is full of. But its ggood to see thst this tech is going to good use.

  101. Not free online in Alabama by amyandjake · · Score: 1

    In Alabama you can renew your car tags online, but you have to pay a processing fee to cover the cost of the credit card processing. Plus they don't give you good confirmation and will sometimes just lose your re-registration request. Doing it online for cheaper means that somebody's cousin will be out of a cushy government job doing registrations rudely in person, so they want to make it hard to do it online...

  102. Is this significant? by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1
    After reading a dozen "well, women like to " posts, some probably too trollish to get all worked up over...

    Not everything women do is "female" in nature, you know? Does using instant messengers and e-mail make men feel more feminine now?

    What these statistics seem (to me) to confirm is that "The PC" is no longer the domain of businesses, scientists, gamers and geeks but is becoming just another household appliance, and internet access is considered part of that. Most of the things PCs are commonly used for aren't really "computer-only" the way programming would be. Typewriter, phone, post office... things many/most people use. Women are hardly some sort of weird minority among that group.

    Having internet access at home doesn't automatically mean you're a techie, no matter what sex or gender or combination thereof you are, were, will be, refuse to be, want to be, or identify as. Nor does it mean you're a non-techie. It's probably going to mean about as much as having a telephone or radio at home.

    Even people who don't really care about it or have the slightest idea what it actually is seem to feel some sort of pressure to "get on the net" so they "won't stay behind". Sometimes the pressure is very real, as with universities providing material online only (don't know how common that is).

    Okay... this was probably incredibly obvious and redundant (again). Guess I'm just getting tired of ...something.

  103. pr0n! by Licensed2Hack · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, among age/gender groups, internet access is highest among females 35-54."

    Women need their pr0n, too!

    Wasn't their an article about women being big online gamers not too long ago? Damn, the're taking over the 'net!

  104. It will as soon as all the ISPs UNCAP THE UPSTREAM by waspleg · · Score: 1

    i mean all the cable modems are rated at 10 mb.. how much do you get? mine is about isdn...

  105. Ahem... by Phoenixhunter · · Score: 1

    And who exactly wears the pants in this family?

  106. The problem of non-participation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right. Now we just need to know if lack of internet access correlates, to any measure, with unwillingness to take part in a poll designed to measure internet access and use (and yes, the pollsters do tell you the poll subject before you're asked to participate).

    The problem of non-participation remains significant in this country for any polling enterprises, as socioeconomic inequality continues to increase rather than decrease.