Slashdot Mirror


Video Projector for Home Theater?

ZeLonewolf writes "I'm thinking about setting up a movie-style home theater system. I've already got the room set up and I've obtained a nice sound system. The last step is to acquire a video projector. I'm considering a few options: Projectors on eBay run from $300 to the tens of thousands. On the other hand, being an electrical engineer, there are plans online to build your own (Google cache), that are potentially as cheap as $200. What are Slashdotters' experiences? Will a $300 projector do the job? How about a home brew?"

350 comments

  1. Wrong place. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 5, Informative

    Get thee over to http://www.avsforum.com and you'll find your answers.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    1. Re:Wrong place. by a_ghostwheel · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Very true. AVSForum is the best place for all home theater / HTPC questions.

    2. Re:Wrong place. by steve · · Score: 5, Informative

      By far the best place is indeed avsforum. just one warning, everyone raves about the infocus X1 over there. That being said if you are going for a true home theatre system make sure you keep in mind your requirements like: - image format (4:3, 16:9) - room type (controlled light, living room etc..) - What will you watch the most? (tv, dvd, pc etc..) - What will you use to feed the projector? (tuner card, PC, video switch etc..) - Will you need true HD ? (requires true HD components like HDTV tuner cards etc..) and don't fall into the fallacies of buying a PC projector if that's not what you want (I have seen many people do this). just my 2cp as a proud owner of a Epson Home lite 10 using myhtpc.

      --
      "there is a marmot in the bucket ? I'll go fix that." (don't ask)
    3. Re:Wrong place. by scottm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, AVSForum will answer all your questions.

      Last fall I bought an Infocus X1 and love it. I built a 16x9 "screen" using blackout cloth (again, AVS Forum for plans) and rarely go to the movies any more. I have a ~100" diagonal screen and things look phenomenal.

      Some people will warn of rainbows with a lower end DLP projector; no one who has seen mine has had a problem, but it'd be worth checking out first. There are also sub-$1000 LCD projectors to be had.

      Anways, for the 3rd time go to avsforum (:

    4. Re:Wrong place. by MadGrizzle · · Score: 5, Informative

      X1 is best bang for the buck, but be aware that you may notice "rainbows" from the unit (search the avsforum for description of the phenomenon). I noticed them and knew I couldn't tolerate them. After 6 months of research, I settled on a Sony HS20 ($3k). It was 3x the price of an X1, but with its HD capabilities, HDCP/DVI/HDMI support and amazing picture quality, it was well worth the money.

    5. Re:Wrong place. by beatbox · · Score: 5, Informative

      In particular, check out their "Digital Projectors - Under $3500 USD MSRP" forum.
      This site is really good. I used to have an old Microtek MVP 700s. It was not so good. The contrast was bad. The color was off, and it had loud fans. I went to the under 3500 forum and read up on the posts. Tons of people were raving about how great the InFocus X1 was. I researched it, and ended up buying one for about $800. It's fantastic! Looks great, nice and bright, quite quiet...

    6. Re:Wrong place. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Informative
      Good advice. Also consider the noise level: some projectors are rather quiet where others sound like a 747 taking off. Finally inquire about bulb life and cost: as a rule the bulbs are expensive.
      By far the best place is indeed avsforum. just one warning, everyone raves about the infocus X1
      Oh, and try to find a shop where you can see two projectors in action side-by-side, for comparison. I was sure I was going to buy the Infocus X1 (partly going by the advice on AVSForum. But after comparing a few units, I settled on the NEC VT46, with a much brighter image and significantly less fan noise. The moral of the story is: go see the unit of your choice first before spending your money.

      As for buying on Ebay... if you happen to buy a secondhand unit with a bulb nearing its end, that $300 projector may need a $400 bulb replacement soon.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    7. Re:Wrong place. by RoyalBlood · · Score: 1

      I'm looking to upgrade but have a resonably priced Sony LCD projector for sale here :

      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&it em =3092538537&ssPageName=ADME:L:DS:US:8

      Check it out.

    8. Re:Wrong place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've also had good luck with the (small) forums over at DIY Builder Group.

      Some guy there (who,btw, can't spell. SPELLING NAZI GO GET HIM!) built a HD capable projector using an SGI 1600SW monitor for the video source.

      *shrug* Don't know what his room is like though.

      (Yeah, most of those things are damn ugly. But if the quality is good, does it matter as much?)

    9. Re:Wrong place. by Dorsai42 · · Score: 1

      Very right, AVSForum is the right place to do the research. Be prepared, however, for information overload, the site is very heavily visited and has a HUGE history. Reseach aside, if you buy a $300 projector, you can expect to get a $300 image.

      --
      If you forget about the future, the future will forget about you.
    10. Re:Wrong place. by Saiai+Hakutyoutani · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I believe the rainbows are present on all DLP projectors, but for some reason they don't seem to be noticeable to most people.

      I'd go for a cheaper LCD projector with a blurrier picture, but without the nuisance of having to se RGB flashes every time I move my eyes.

    11. Re:Wrong place. by Omega1045 · · Score: 0
      I found a number of places that had this in the $2800 range (with shipping) at Yahoo Shopping:

      HS20

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    12. Re:Wrong place. by Dastardly · · Score: 2, Informative

      But after comparing a few units, I settled on the NEC VT46, with a much brighter image and significantly less fan noise. The moral of the story is: go see the unit of your choice first before spending your money.

      Brighter is not necessarily better, especially in a light controlled room like a dedicated home theater room. The Panasonic L500 is getting good reviews from avsforum and other reviewers, but is rated as 800 lumens. One reviewer set it up and after adjusting the aperture for the best picture measured the actual light output as 450 lumens. The reason for this is that a lower light output will result in better blacks. As the screen gets larger more light will be needed, but resolution issues will start to occur at the same time.

      But, you are correct audition a projector before buying it. Hpefully under lighting condtions similar to your room.

    13. Re:Wrong place. by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      The Optoma H30 is also a good bet. Slightly more expensive than the X1 (about $1300 I think) and arguably better. At the very least it is much less likely to show you rainbows (faster color wheel). There's a huge H30 thread at avsforum that's worth checking out.

      My feeling is that by the time I'm ready for HDTV I'll just buy another cheapie projector (maybe 2 years from now) and ebay my H30

      Anyways, I didn't RTFA. It's dead. Making your own projector? Doubtful at best.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    14. Re:Wrong place. by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1
      HOLY CRAP!

      Did everyone see this thread?. Thats the most replies I have seen (and in 3 months too) of any forum I have ever visited. That Optoma H30 must be hot shit..

    15. Re:Wrong place. by jll · · Score: 1
    16. Re:Wrong place. by Valtor · · Score: 1

      Well the new king now is the BENQ 6100 in the 800 US$ range. Which for DVD viewing is better than the X1 especially if you are using an HTPC.

      --
      "Sockets are the standard networking API, also useful for stopping your eyes from falling onto your cheeks" zeromq.org
    17. Re:Wrong place. by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also purchased an X1 after reading the reviews on AVS forums. There's a reason that it's so highly thought-of on that site - it is very good value for the money with an excellent picture.

      I did notice rainbows for the first couple of weeks when I used it, however I've had it for 2 months now and I very, very rarely notice them anymore. I suppose given enough exposure, I "tuned them out" subconciously like traffic noise, air conditioner hum, etc.

      I'm very happy with mine! There's nothing like watching a movie on a really big screen with a good sound system cranked. I couldn't see myself going with a huge, heavy rear-projection set. Front Projectors (FP) are easily portable, easy to install, and provide a good picture for the price.

      Do not skimp on the screen however - the projector is only half of the equation. You can make your own screen quite easily (also instructions on AVSF).

      The other consideration with FPs is that you need a fairly dark room to get the best picture. If you have a lot of light entering the room that you can't control, there's no way of getting true blacks, and you'd probably be better-off going with a rear projector.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    18. Re:Wrong place. by madpuppy · · Score: 1

      10-4, AVSforum is the best place to go, also, GO to
      www.projectorcentral.com, there are ALOT to consider when purchasing a projector, I can assure you that you will have bad results if you try to build one yourself, depending the size of your room and the the type of media you will be watching you have a few hard choices to make, For myself, I have a room that is 11'x17' and I only expect to watch Movies, so I chose the SANYO LCD PLV-Z2 it is a 16:9 widescreen but if that is too much for you, Infocus sells the X-1 it retails for about 900.00 it is a DLP 800x600 resolution projector, one thing about DLP, there is a thing called the "rainbow effect" not everyone can see it, me and my wife can and it is annoying, if you decide to buy one try to get a viewing first to see if it will bother you. and google "dlp,rainbow effect" and "lcd screen door effect" also, those big, clunky 3 gun crt projectors are really not the way to go, the new ones (if they still make them) are way too expensive and the old ones are becoming difficult to find parts for. not a cool thing to find out when you need to fix it.

      I hope this helps you (if you even get a chance to read it)

      and remember www.avsforum.com and www.projectorcentral.com

      chow...

      format projector but it is 1975.00, of you

    19. Re:Wrong place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'd buy either the Benq 6100
      http://www.benq.com/projectors/projector_pb6 100.ht ml

      or 6200
      http://www.benq.com/projectors/projector_pb6 200.ht ml

      A friend just bought the 6100 for about $950 after tax and shipping. It looks great. I have seen LCD projectors before, this one is better. If I am not mistaken, the Benq prijectors have a faster color wheel, therefore less rainbow, than the X1. The picture is just amazing,

      If you are going to be using it as a sometimes computer monitor or in a small room, go with the 6200 it has better resolution, brightness and throw size. It costs around $1500 with tax and shipping.

    20. Re:Wrong place. by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      X1 is best bang for the buck, but be aware that you may notice "rainbows" from the unit (search the avsforum for description of the phenomenon). I noticed them and knew I couldn't tolerate them.

      I bought one (Infocus X1) and didn't think I'd tolerate it either but I soon began to ignore it. I never notice it anymore unless it's a really dark scene with a lot of motion. Otherwise it's fantastic to have a projector at home. I never go to the movie theater anymore and just rent/buy DVDs instead. Hell, I didn't even buy a screen since it looks great on my blank white basement wall (drywall w/white paint). If you've got the money to spend I'd definitely suggest going this route and picking up a projector. It's very cool.

    21. Re:Wrong place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>That Optoma H30 must be hot shit..

      unless it has natalie portman covered in hot grits, it's not that hot..

    22. Re:Wrong place. by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      Oh, and try to find a shop where you can see two projectors in action side-by-side, for comparison.

      ...and if you do, buy it there! Don't be an asshole and waste the time and resources of a dealership that cares enough to have several competitive models, properly set up, and enough floor space to do a side-by-side demo. I've seen so many people who will use up hours of a dealer's time, then buy it on-line.

      The six store local chain I used to work for just went bankrupt and closed...so I'm a little bitter. I'm sure this post will be followed-up by posters rationalizing doing this, citing bad experiences with dealers. I'm not talking about bad dealers. If the dealer wasn't competent, these people wouldn't be wasting their time in the first place.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    23. Re:Wrong place. by PrintError · · Score: 1

      I'm using a $6k Hitachi as my daily TV and home entertainment. Been doing so for years now. My house is the party pad having a 120" screen and full surround sound.

      Beware, it's hard to get people to leave your house once they see your TV.

      Mine is aptly named "Mr. Wall"

    24. Re:Wrong place. by syukton · · Score: 1

      2cp? you play everquest, don't you?

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    25. Re:Wrong place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way partner. You are out of your mind. That's not the way it works. Only a sucker makes a deal out of guilt in a competitve market. That might make you sad and bitter, but welcome to America.
      When the government subsidizes my big screen TV then I will be glad as hell to play the loyal friend. But if it's dog eat dog, then it's the customers duty to treat salespeople as the enemy. That's the way it is.
      I think it sucks too and we should all work for change. But you can't have it both ways and asking consumers to buy things out of guilt in a winner-take-all economy is ridiculous.

    26. Re:Wrong place. by PokeBlor · · Score: 1

      I have the X1 at my home and I absolutely love it. It really is a great projector for the price. If you are looking to keep your projector under 1.5k or so, definitely consider the X1. Some people do notice rambows. Luckily, I am not one of those people so I fully enjoy it.

    27. Re:Wrong place. by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      A Mr. A Coward wrote:
      No way partner. You are out of your mind. That's not the way it works. Only a sucker makes a deal out of guilt in a competitve market. That might make you sad and bitter, but welcome to America.
      When the government subsidizes my big screen TV then I will be glad as hell to play the loyal friend. But if it's dog eat dog, then it's the customers duty to treat salespeople as the enemy. That's the way it is.
      I think it sucks too and we should all work for change. But you can't have it both ways and asking consumers to buy things out of guilt in a winner-take-all economy is ridiculous.

      Not "guilt". The simple fact is that the average consumer does not, and shouldn't have to, know the entire market for consumer electronics in order to make a purchase. There are hundreds of models out there, and someone who deals with them on a daily basis stands a far better chance of being able to offer worthwhile advice. Aquiring that knowledge and offering it to the public costs money. That cost is passed on the consumer with a slightly higher price (usually 1% to 5% above the "warehouse club" price).

      Go buy a plasma TV at CostCo if you want. But ask the useless drones there all your questions, and enjoy the experience of their responses ranging from "That's not my department" to cow-like expressions to (the "helpful" ones) reading the outside of the box to you. Do NOT waste the time and resources of a quality retailer because you wanted to save a few bucks and wound up buying something that will not fit your needs. All they sell is "SKU"s (Stock Keeping Units). Plasma TVs or gallon jars of mayonnaise, it's all the same to them.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    28. Re:Wrong place. by parksie · · Score: 1

      You ain't seen nuthin' yet

      Helps when our ex-board admin develops vBulletin.

      Mmmmm...stress testing :D

    29. Re:Wrong place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BEATBOX
      If you purchased a BRAND NEW InFocus X1 with the original 2 year warranty starting from the date you purchased it, for under $900 (without rebate of course) I would be amazed!!! If you purchased for under $800 (without rebate) GEEZ, please let EVERYONE know where you pick it up at, PLEASE! I am an InFocus dealer and my cost for a NEW unit is around $850 and I don't get a rebate, just a whole $10 spiff for selling it.

      People, PLEASE quit trying to be "I know it all, and being over "Cool" on what you know. The vast majority of all of you don't know Jack. People who have been selling this product would know ALOT, TONS, more than the Joe who state "I have done the research and...." he know nothing. If you want certain specs ask a true Audio Visual DEALER! Not Best Buy, Office Depot or a DOT COM company. Ask someone who has been there from the start, when LCD panels started out, with only 8 shades of grey. Those people will know what is good, better and best.

      Also remember this...
      DLP is only made by Texas Insturments and no one else. Every single projector out there that use DLP technology as it display engine, has 80 to 90% the same parts as brand the next brand that uses the DLP type engine (there are several different types of DLP engines with different resolutions)

      LCD projection panels (the original display engine) ...there are only 4 TRUE makers of LCD panels, that I know of, EPSON, Sanyo, Hitachi and either Sharp or Sony. And quality of their panels, well lets say this..I have been selling this equipment since 1988 and I do not own a projector and truly never will, but if I did I would put my money done on an EPSON home theater unit. But that is only if I wanted something big to show off. A television picture tube will alway beat a projector, front, rear, ceiling or table mounted. I personally would rather watch a my old 45" Mitsubishi television picture tube than a projector.

      Oh so getting back to Mr BeatS HIS MEAT Box, so is your X1 used? Did it "fall of the deliver truck"? Or are you just plain BS-ing about what you paid for it?

      BTW you should have waited for the X2, it is brighter! 1,500 lumens vs. 1,100 lumens.

  2. Ask elsewhere for better info... by jargoone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Link to a Yahoo group, and their bandwidth is exceeded even before the story is posted. Niiiice...

    The "homebrew" ones are a joke if you want something with a decent picture. And the contraption itself looks riduculous. Forget it.

    There is a good deal on a refurbed DLP projector for about $3500 -- check gotapex.com (great site for deals). Read around for more info on what DLP is, but that and LCD are preferable to CRT projectors these days.

    Anyway, you're more likely to get better information from someplace that deals directly with home theater equipment. The forum at Home Theater Spot has great information, despite their gestapo posting rules.

    1. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by infinite9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      gotapex.com

      You scared the crap out of me. I first read that as goatsex.com.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    2. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by binaryDigit · · Score: 1

      There is a good deal on a refurbed DLP projector for about $3500

      egads! A $600 DLP projector on ebay will give you a very reasonable picture. If you don't want or need the ultimate, check out any of the
      Read around for more info on what DLP is, but that and LCD are preferable to CRT projectors these days.

      Well, DLP and LCD are "preferable" if space and convenience is more of an issue than absolute picture quality. If you want the best picture for your money, then CRT is the ONLY way to go. Even though higher end DLP projectors are near or at CRT brightness levels (but for a pretty hefty premium), but they still can't even play in the same park when it comes to black levels and contrast ratios (not to mention other DLP artifacts like honeycombing). CRT's suck because they're huge and they have to be tweaked regularly to get the best picture, but if you have the space and patience, they provide the best picture by far.

    3. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2, Informative

      LCD and DLP have "native" resolutions, which is a straightjacket. Feed them video outside their native resolution and even with good pixel compression, it will not look good as CRT.

      Of course, CRT projectors are huge, expensive, and require lots of calibration to keep them in shape. But if cost and space are no object, CRT is certainly preferable.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    4. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll
      "check gotapex.com"

      That has a G, O, A, T, E, C, X

      Only missing one letter.

    5. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on a 100" screen. Noooooooo.

    6. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by jargoone · · Score: 1

      A $600 DLP projector on ebay will give you a very reasonable picture.

      You're correct of course, but the reason I mentioned that one is because it's like 1/3 off the new retail price. I don't know what the target price is, but in the $5k range, that one is a steal.

      Even though higher end DLP projectors are near or at CRT brightness levels (but for a pretty hefty premium)

      The one mentioned above is 1000 ANSI lumens, 1400:1 contrast.

      CRT's suck because they're huge and they have to be tweaked regularly to get the best picture

      Amen to that. I have a rear-projection HDTV, and it's hell to maintain the picture. I can't imagine further multiplying the distance between the CRT and the screen.

    7. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by imthatguy · · Score: 1

      well scaring the crap out of goatse isnt that difficult.....

      --
      Did you know you can be apathetic to apathy? Not that I give a shit...
    8. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by alphakappa · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There is a good deal on a refurbed DLP projector for about $3500 -- check gotapex.com [gotapex.com]

      Pheww! for a moment I thought it was another goatse link.

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    9. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by yellena · · Score: 1

      CRT's have "native" vertical resolutions called lines.

    10. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by gessel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Be aware though, as an owner of an LCD projector, that watching TV runs about $0.40/hr in bulbs (actual life for me runs about 1000 hrs to failure, about 700 until the picture is so obviously muddy that failure is pending). Of course ebay helps reduce the bulb cost to a more managable $0.10/hr.

      CRT projectors run 7500-10,000 hrs on a set of guns, which at retail isn't that different for the nice ones, but used they're a much better bargain over a long period of time. Plus a good CRT projector has an infinitely better picture than an LCD/DMD, though all a capable of far exceeding the data avialable in a NTSC image.

      Some details though:
      DMD/LCD projectors generally have square pixels, so you get 640x480, or more likely you scale by a non-integer and get a blurry picture (it's probably still far better than a regular TV, so the blurring may be irrelevant). CRTs don't quantify the scan lines into pixels and are therefore "better" with analog TV. Digital TV is another beast, but typically also uses non-square pixels (eg D1 720x480) which inexpensive DMD/LCD projectors still can't deal with except by scaling.

      I find DMD projectors "harsh". Others might call it "crisp." It doesn't look good to me. LCDs look better, but are a bit muddy. A good CRT projector looks great. But they're HUGE, and expensive, so... LCD or DMD projectors are probably the way to go in practice, just be aware of the operating cost. Figure out which models meet your requirements, figure out the purchase price, and add pro-rated bulb cost and see if it's still a good deal. Bulb prices vary a lot by projectors, but in general don't buy something brighter than you need, or you'll be paying for it as long as you own it.

    11. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the new website (he is back) is goat.cx. Resume smashing yourself in the head just thinking about what drove him to that.

    12. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by rowanxmas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, what about playing console games? That is the main reason I want one of these... can anyone offer some experiences getting Halo to work well?

    13. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Step #1: plug xbox into projector.

      Step #2: put xbox into widescreen mode if your screen in 16x9.

      That's pretty much it. I play Halo in widescreen mode on my H30 and it looks freaking awesome.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    14. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by dfghjk · · Score: 3, Informative

      While I would agree that CRT projectors can be great and I use one in my theater, I wouldn't agree that the have an "infinitely better picture" (how's that?) or that they "don't quantify the scan lines". They most certainly do. With CRT projectors you will need to match a video processor to the projector and to the screen size and you will need to plan on frequent calibration. With CRT's you get fantastic blacks and tremendous color but it takes a commitment to live with them.

    15. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by cft_128 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget the burn in associated with CRT projection. If any games are going to be played or letter boxed or pillar boxed content is going to be played careful attention is needed. LCDs and DLPs really don't have long term burn in (some LCDs exhibit short time image retention but it goes away pretty quickly. I've never seen it in my LCD rear projector)

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    16. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by scottp · · Score: 2, Informative

      My good friend owns and installs home theaters for a living, we recently attended the home theater show in Orlando. The Infocus SP4800 ($1199.00 MSRP) is a great projector for 8foot or smaller screens in a controlled light situation. That is the bottom one I'd use, in fact I'm fixing to install one in my basement/home theater, unless I win the lottery then I'm going with the Infocus SP7200 (~$5k) which is an incredible projector. We play xbox/ps2 on the SP4800 and it rocks, it does HDTV well, only draw back in my book (for the price) is it is 800x600, I'd rather have at least 1024, but maybe one day. Buy new and go with at least the Infocus SP4800, you should be pleased. Good luck, hope this helps.

    17. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by jargoone · · Score: 1

      unless I win the lottery then I'm going with the Infocus SP7200 (~$5k)

      Heh, thanks for backing me up, maybe without realizing it. The projector I mentioned for $3500 is the Infocus SP7200, rebadged as Toshiba.

    18. Re:Ask elsewhere for better info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did the math as compared to a Gateway plasma

      5 years plasma = $3000

      5 years X 1projector = $2000
      1 unit = $1000
      2 bulbs = $600
      80 inch screen= $400

      That 2 bulbs might be a worst case for 5 years. In the last 8 months, I've used 800 hours of my 4000.

      Do this comparison with a TV of your choice for "real" cost.

  3. You get what you pay for. by ECXStar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did this same research and with projectors, you do get what you paid for. Rear projection will be brighter and more suiteable for home situations due to lighting. Just my 2c...

    1. Re:You get what you pay for. by bcboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rear projection units, frankly, don't hold a candle to the latest generation of projectors in the same price range. I spent less than a rear projector would have cost me and got a much nicer product.

      Of course image quality is subjective, and there are endless other factors to consider like room lighting, room size, and so-forth.

      I never watch videos in daylight hours and I never watch broadcast TV at all, so the decision was easier. But depending on the room it can be quite cheap to control the light with some blackout cloth.

      I also didn't want an enormous box in the room. The projector is very discrete and not in the way of anything. With young children it's almost impossible to make it to a theater any more, but with a beautiful projection on a 100" screen I don't feel the need to.

  4. McFly? by Superliminal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not to be curmudgeonly, but why the hell even *bother* posting a link to geocities on slashdot? Hello? Anybody?

    1. Re:McFly? by BlueCup · · Score: 1

      Heh, thats something that wouldn't even survive SlashNot

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    2. Re:McFly? by snooo53 · · Score: 1

      While I appreciate the attempt at expanding the vocabulary here on slashdot, next time kindly include a dictionary.com link for the rest of us inarticulate folks. Thank you!

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    3. Re:McFly? by Superliminal · · Score: 0
    4. Re:McFly? by getagrip · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that Geocities and Yahoo survive on advertising revenue. Having a site on Geocities linked by Slashdot ought to bring in huge numbers of page hits and thus more revenue. You would think Yahoo would also have the bandwith and server capacity to handle being Slashdotted. So why would they cut off access to the page?

  5. The $300 model is more than good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Plus I have a 5-star rating and ship super fast so go right ahead a click in that bid.

  6. No brainer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A projector for home theater is a no brainer IMHO. A relative of mine has an Infocus X1 projector with 100" screen.. Blows away any TV several times the price..

    DIY though?? I don't see that happening for some reason?

    1. Re:No brainer by Skraut · · Score: 1
      I've got one too. With a nice 7.1 surround sound. The only problem is fighting off all the friends who want to bring their DVD's over and watch em on my system

      Besides Lay-Z-Boys beat theater seats any day.

      --
      Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    2. Re:No brainer by bobsled · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree - we use InFocus projectors here at work (X1's can be had for around $925 online including shipping - check Pricewatch under "Presentation"... On those "movie nights" at work we run them off a laptop with audio piped into audio equipment we all bring in from home. Awesome picture - and a much better use of the equipment than it gets from the Marketing guys ;-)

      --
      Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code...
    3. Re:No brainer by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      DIY though?? I don't see that happening for some reason?

      I made one for less than $5.00 (fresnel lens, cardboard, duct tape) plus an old composite monitor. It was very dim, needed the room pitch black, but was amazingly cool all the same. $5.00 for a 6-foot wide novelty screen. It was at least worth the effort of assembly (less than an hour, real simple) to see it actually working to a reasonable degree.

      I like cool stuff that sucks.

  7. Hmm, e-bay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Getting them from E-bay might not be a good idea, remember that the lightbulb has a limited number of hours before the light strenght is reduced and it finally breaks.

    1. Re:Hmm, e-bay by lukehan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I work at a college and we had a bulb blow and completely ruin the internals of the projector (lcd, circuit board, pwr supply blew at the same time) These things can be expensive (we had to get a new one, $4K)

    2. Re:Hmm, e-bay by laddhebert · · Score: 1
      I agree, buy from a reputable source. I bought mine from Circuit City and the first one had a faulty bulb. It was just a matter of driving 1 mile back to the store and exchanging it for another one. Btw, mine was the Infocus X1.

      -L

      --
      Don't Panic.
    3. Re:Hmm, e-bay by donaldberry · · Score: 1

      curt pulma or pulmer i think is his name. i know a few people that have bought projectors from him, he is honest and he knows his stuff. he'll tell you how much wear on is on the tubes, how many hours you should be able to get out of them, ect. ect. you can find his stuff on ebay or get on his email list - he sends out lists of all the projectors he has or has recently aquired every now and then. if you talk to him directly you can have him totally rebuild a projector for you, great value on the dollar when you buy his stuff.

      as a side note he gets most of his stuff from big companies or colleges that are sell these things really cheap. if you are little more abitious check out your local universtiy.

      -daddy

    4. Re:Hmm, e-bay by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      The $13,000 JVC projectors that I've used automatically warn before the light needs to be changed and then shut off when you go past the usage limit. You can reset them but it is dangerous because the lights can explode. These lights were encased in a metal module, but I wouldn't have risked it. It was pretty obvious when lights were getting old, they would get a yellow tint. The bulbs were about $700 each but the projectors were sure nice!

  8. Durn... alternate site? by ferralis · · Score: 3, Informative
    Apparently the geocities account wasn't big enough for even the preliminary /. effect.

    Anybody have an alternate site? I found this one on google.

    --
    Any generalization is a stupid one.
    1. Re:Durn... alternate site? by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      That's nice-- it basically links back to the slashdotted geocities website (and has a few pictures of it). It also has a lot more pictures of another design... but it looks pretty scary.

      First off, the fans blow air downward instead of up and out. Second, the LCD monitor is supposedly lit from the front by two bulbs and that is supposed to work. Whenever I take my color lcd phone out in bright sunlight, the result is a dark screen, not a brighter one. Maybe they replaced the screen's backlight with a reflector, but then the light will be going through the LCD twice, and from two different angles (since there are two bulbs) - I'd think you'd get some awful ghosts if you ever got a picture.

      Thanks for the link, though, but like all things on the internet, things need to be taken with a grain of salt.

    2. Re:Durn... alternate site? by ferralis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, looks pretty bogus, but later on they have different links and some possibly workable images... plus a handy link to a site selling surplus projector lenses. :)

      --
      Any generalization is a stupid one.
  9. Tough by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a $300 projector will more likely than not have poor quality and have faults within a year, there is a reason that good quality projecters are priced so highly. I have only expierenced bad quality when i have used cheap projectors on my projects, so i would recommend buying new from a top retailer such as Sony, and see how it suits you. And if you don't like it / it has faults you can return it with warranty

    1. Re:Tough by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I kind of like the idea of a self-built projector. The reason most projectors are so expensive is portability. A self-built device, in order to get the resolution desired, uses a full-size computer LCD panel, maybe 13-17" corner-to-corner. LCD projectors use an LCD panel with the same number of pixels that are roughly 1.5" corner-to-corner. For that reason, most of the panels aren't good enough to make it into a projector. High waste = high cost.

      A homebrew design should be able to get much higher resolution (given a higher resolution panel) than any pre-built projector that I've been able to find. However, you have to do it: A. without fresnels (i.e. with high quality glass optics), B. with a high quality bulb, and C. with an appropriate way of diffusing the light from the bulb to avoid hot spots. An ideal design would also do it D. without any mirrors.

      Start with two lenses in a cardboard tube. One lens should be fixed. The other should rotate in two directions. This gives you the ability to adjust the relative height and width. You'll also need to write software to simulate keystoning adjustment.

      Now mount this assembly at one end of a long box. Take a concave mirror and place it at the other end of the box at roughly 45 degrees. Now make a hole in the top of that box just above the concave mirror. Place another long box vertically above it. Mount your LCD panel in that. Illuminate the inside of the box temporarily and look through the lens. If you cannot see the entire LCD panel, adjust the distance between the panel and the mirror until you can.

      Now, mount two or three thicknesses of diffusion paper above the LCD panel. Place a high intensity bulb above that. Finally, leave the top open. Add pieces of cardboard, painted black, to form a series of light baffles that prefent light from escaping, but allow hot air from the bulb to spiral upwards to the top. Add some air vents near the bottom.

      Such a design will be quite large, but should be self-cooling by convection. If your bulbs start burn out too quickly, add a fan.

      Admittedly, the custom optics could be a little hard to get right.... :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  10. Bulbs by Ickster · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was looking into projectors as well, but discovered a big drawback: the bulbs are good for about 2000 hours and then run about $350 (on average) for a new one. That's a lot of money every couple of years...

    --
    --- Usually, those that believe in absolutes are ignorant, fools, or both.
    1. Re:Bulbs by Velcroman98 · · Score: 2, Informative
      The bulbs vary in price, and are basically proportional as to how bright (I think the term is lumens?) the bulb is. The really expensive systems, that still show a good picture when the lights are on are more expensive and so are the bulbs.

      The projectors I've used had bulbs that varied between $500 and $1,000 When I check a local high-end hi-def projector store in Phoenix last year, the top system's bulbs were about $3,000 to replace (Though a better deal could be found on the Internet).

      Arm yourself with as much knowledge as you can before you go out and blow those big dollars!

    2. Re:Bulbs by happynut · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not only do the bulbs have a 2000 hour "rated" life, but that life is defined as the bulb having at least 50% of the original brightness.

      Most bulbs slowly decline in brightness over the span of its lifetime, so your 1200 lumen projector (or whatever its starting spec was) will slowly get dimmer and dimmer before the bulb fails completely.

    3. Re:Bulbs by atamar · · Score: 1

      > I was looking into projectors as well, but
      > discovered a big drawback: the bulbs are good for
      > about 2000 hours and then run about $350 (on
      > average) for a new one. That's a lot of money
      > every couple of years...

      Um... the way I look at it, I could've paid about 3000e for a puny 30-40" wide screen TV, or 2-3 times as much for a plasma display (and that's still pretty nasty to lug around), or about 2000e plus 350e every two years for a small, light unit that gives me a wallful of eye candy. By the time the price gets even, i'll be changing equipment anyway.

      Your prices in the US will vary, but the proportions shouldn't be too far off.

      (And why isn't this bloody thing accepting ISO-8859-15 euro chars?)

    4. Re:Bulbs by Maniakes · · Score: 4, Informative

      $350 / 2000 hours = 17.5 cents/hour.
      Movie from blockbuster = $3 / 2 hours = $1.50/hour

      Bulb costs are swamped by content costs.

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    5. Re:Bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But using 200W for a projector vs. about 1000W for a plasma... Not sure about you, but it seems like the plasma would be just as expensive over time, have burn in problems, and be not as large.

    6. Re:Bulbs by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1, Informative

      >Movie from blockbuster = $3 / 2 hours = $1.50/hour

      How is this insightful? A movie doesn't play itself.

      A television tube has a useable lifespan of almost a decade.

      There is serious downside to owning projection equipment, ignoring bulb lifespan and prices is setting up yourself up for a fall. The same way its much more economical to own a personal laser printer than an inkjet printer.

      2000 hours is ONE YEAR at 6 hours a day, which is about the average time a television is left on, especially in the homes of videophiles or homes with kids. If you treat your projector the same way you treat your TV you will be replacing the bulb annually.

    7. Re:Bulbs by lewiz · · Score: 1

      Content costs? Obviously you must be new around here ;)

    8. Re:Bulbs by Grimster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er one 2 hour movie a night = 730 hours a YEAR so using "real math" that's 2-3 years per bulb.

      The other math - Infocus X1 $999 at Best Buy, $250 for a bulb - to equal the cost of my 57" HDTV means even at even 1 bulb per year I'll get 5 years out of the Infocus to equal the $2400 for my TV. I figure before 5 years is up something on that big screen is likely to need service anyway. Besides by the time my bulb wears out I'll likely be able to upgrade my projector at least 2 steps for another $1000 and put the current one up on Ebay or let someone inherit it.

      And even if you watched movies 10 hours per day that's 200 days per bulb or $400 per year for bulbs roughly.

      Also my 57" Hitachi 16:9 aspect TV cannot even begin to compare to the 72inch WIDE (not diagonal) picture I get downstairs in my theater on my X1 there's no competition between the two at all, my TV is nice, no doubt, but that 72" display I get on the projector just kicks the ass of my TV up and down the block.

      If you're pinching pennies hit Wal-Mart and snag a 27" stereo TV, they're getting real cheap, if you're about getting some real enjoyment out of your DVD's (or your DVD's ripped to a terabyte harddrive array and played on a PC hooked to the projector) then once you see that projection image you'll know why you got it.

      link for some pics of my theater project, my digital camera ruins the pics of the screens I took but you can get an idea).

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
    9. Re:Bulbs by Deanasc · · Score: 1
      Well you are right that one movie is 3 bucks but if you get HBO for $16 a month (rough average from the last couple towns I got it in) content only costs 2 cents an hour.

      So if you put aside a dollar every time you watch a movie you'll have a good chunk of the money saved to buy a new bulb when it burns out.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    10. Re:Bulbs by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      "So figuring only one 2 hour movie a night you won't even get a year out of one bulb."

      Huh? 2000 hours / 2 hours per movie = 1000 movies = 1000 nights ~= 3 years per bulb... What math class were you in? :)

    11. Re:Bulbs by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
      Well, I guess the solution to this problem is to cool the unit as much as possible.

      From what I know in Biology/Chemistry, for every 10 degree celsius drop in temperature, the life of things tends to double or even triple, and I'd bet cooling these bulbs would have a similar effect.

      So how about replacing the fans with ultra-powerful ones (though keeping them quiet may be a problem). Or, cut more cooling holes and add fans there so more cool air is blown directly at the bulbs.

      Or... somehow put a heatsink on the bulb's socket so it gets better cooled internally.

      Or... put it in a refrigerator :)

    12. Re:Bulbs by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      This is a good point. I did this analysis as well and came up with something like this:

      I bought a $1300 projector. Freaking amazing picture (IMHO), 94 inches (WIDE, not diagonal). Screen cost me $60 to make. Very cheap solution. I love it. It's rated at only 800 lumens but at night I put the brightness at -6 to get what I consider a normal image. If I crank the brightness up closer to max I can watch the image (crappy contrast but ok for news and stuff) on a cloudy day with regular blinds. And that's in economy mode, which is reduced brightness.

      Anyways, the bulb is rated for 3000 hours. I believe it costs $400 for a replacement. That's 13 cents per hour, not bad. Assuming I watch 3 hours a day (high estimate) the bulb could last me as much as 3+ years.

      But in a couple of years I will be ready to ebay my H30 and buy upgrade to whatever is entry-level at that time. Honestly, unless I am unlucky with this bulb I doubt I will every replace it.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    13. Re:Bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (And why isn't this bloody thing accepting ISO-8859-15 euro chars?)

      You must be new here...

    14. Re:Bulbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A word to the wise: look at his user ID.

    15. Re:Bulbs by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is why it's not a great idea to make your home theatre your "leave the TV on while you do other stuff" room.

      I have my X1 for watching movies and playing (big) games on, however when I just want to watch the news, or regular TV, I have a small 27" screen that I switch the input to.

      Works great and saves the bulb!

      Of course, the X1 bulb is rated at 4,000 hours, and only costs around $250-300 as I recall, so it's not too terrible. It should last me around 6 or 7 years with the amount that I use it, by which point I'll definately have something newer anyway :)

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    16. Re:Bulbs by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Bulb life is rated as the amount of time it takes for the bulb to reach 50% of original brightness. But, brightness vs time is not a linear function, there is a dramatic decrease in the first couple of hundred hours and then it asymptocially approachs zero lumens. So, unless you are watching with a brand new bulb, you are probably already down to 75% or less of originally brightness.

      So, this leads to another option - buy a really bright screen. On the low end, Dalite has a model that will easily come in under $300 - the down side is that the audience must sit relatively close to center to get the full brightness, and you can't ceiling mount the projector because the material in this particular Dalite model is retro-reflective, i.e. the light is reflected back towards the source. You need angular-reflective material if you want to ceiling mount, which leads to the more expensive option--

      Vutec came out with a new material about a year ago that they are selling in their high-end screens - model name Silverstar. This material almost defies the laws of physics in that viewing angle is much wider than it "should be" (just like a bumble bee "can't" fly). The silverstar is also angular-reflective instead of retro-reflective. The top end Silverstar will run you around $2K depending on how much margin the dealer gets from you.

      Both the silverstar and this unnamed model from Dalite look incredible, if you sit in the right place. Being so bright, the image just pops out, especially outdoor daylight scenes. Just for the silverstar the "right place" to sit is much more of the room than with the Dalite.

      The bulbs for my projector are rated for 1000 hours and cost about $500 each, maybe more if you don't want to shop around. So far, I have been able to run my current bulb to about 2500 hours with my silverstar screen. I fully expect to get past 3000 hours, maybe even close to 4000 before the bulb is really too dim to keep using. Meanwhile I'm using the extra time between bulb changes to watch ebay and other sources for people selling the necessary bulbs for really cheap.($200 and under).

      So, in some ways, the expensive screen pays for itself by significantly increasing usuable bulb life. And, in the meantime, it produces one of the best looking images available and will continue to do so even when I upgrade to a new projector.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    17. Re:Bulbs by MisterMoney · · Score: 1

      i know circuit city had a deal awhile ago where with the purchase of an infocus projector, for an extra $400 or so they would give you free replacement bulbs for 4 years. not sure if they are still offering it now though.

  11. I have a friend who did this. by Pi_0's+don't+shower · · Score: 2, Informative

    He has a projector that's actually near the bottom of the line (~$1500), and he's really happy with it. Projects a nice 100" image or so, and though it's not as good quality (I'm sure) as a $30,000 projector, it does save him $28,500...

    I've seen it, BTW, and I think it's not worth it to spend more. But check it out for yourself at various AV stores.

  12. DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by revscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My father in law works at Texas Instruments and got ahold of one of those DLP projectors. Holy moly, that thing looks GREAT. We watched Two Towers on it, and he had put up a simple white sheet on the wall to watch the movie on. It looked very nice, like a smaller movie projection. Colors are extremely bright; I'd been so used to projectors losing brightness proportional to their distance that the brightness of this thing took me by surprise.

    Plus those DLP chips are just so freakin' cool.

    1. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by isaac · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'd been so used to projectors losing brightness proportional to their distance that the brightness of this thing took me by surprise.

      I'd be pretty surprised if any projector, DLP or otherwise, did not decrease in intensity as the inverse square of the distance.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    2. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      two words: laser projecters

    3. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by Cylix · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I got one better...

      I watched two towers at my universities planetarium. It already had a great projector, we simply hooked up a DVD player to the unit.

      Yeah, I think they spent well over 2 mil on the setup, but what's the point in having something if you can't abuse it?

      Labtech's are handy creatures to keep around.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    4. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      I'd been so used to projectors losing brightness proportional to their distance that the brightness of this thing took me by surprise.
      I have compared a few DLP and LCD units, and while the contrast and color of the DLPs beat the LCDs, the image of the LCDs was brighter than the DLPs with similarly powerful bulbs (no, I don't know here the DLPs leave the 'extra' light :-). To achieve the same brightness, a DLP will require a brighter bulb, which means extra $$$ and fan noise. But... if you do fork over the cash for that brighter bulb, the picture of a DLP does look a lot better.

      I've compared a few units, like the much-vaunted Infocus X1 and the similarly-priced Nec VT46. Compared to the NEC, the X1's picture was rather dark... too dark for a not-quite-dark room. Since I didn't have the cash for a brighter DLP, I settled on the NEC, and so far I am very pleased with its performance.

      Oh and please spend another few dollars on a proper projection screen. It's money well spent.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about them? Their beams magically pick up extra photons on the way to the screen?

    6. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by Daath · · Score: 1
      ... the image of the LCDs was brighter than the DLPs with similarly powerful bulbs (no, I don't know here the DLPs leave the 'extra' light :-). To achieve the same brightness, a DLP will require a brighter bulb ...

      That's how DMD/DLP works :) It uses mirrors, and not all light goes out of the projector.
      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    7. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by Deanasc · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is why I wish I could embed a picture on slashdot. If you adjust the focal point so that it is outside and in front of the projector you can project a brighter although smaller then otherwise image. The ray traycing would increase the brightness at the expense of image size over the same distance. This would require some fairly complex optics. It would probably be cheaper to get a better projector if brightness was a serious issue.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    8. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      That's the problem I'm wondering about with me getting one. My room I have my HT in, is quite bright during daylight hours. 3 windows.

      If I put up some simple pull down blinds, would this get sufficiently dark to watch tv on during day? Or, do you pretty much need to have a totally 'blacked out' room....?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by Bastard+Operator+Fro · · Score: 1

      well, they don't. :)

      Mainly because they are focused light, and not an unfocused point source... after all, lasers don't follow the inverse square law.

      --
      Shaun Nelson - Bastard Operator (From Hell / For Hire)
    10. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      brightness IS a serious issue. they get seriously greater amounts of money for projectors which project a brighter image.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by Zarquon · · Score: 1

      Heh. We were at the last ALS, and got bored in the evening.. so we hooked the laptop up to the big projector and watched B5 episodes. We had attracted a dozen people by the time they kicked us out for Linus' panel.

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    12. Re:DLP: Bright, clear, and did I mention bright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't know about that, but if you do have to black out the windows, at the same time you can start growing dope or making meth in there; that will help you lower the infrastructure cost!

  13. Epson S1 gets the job done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Picked up an Epson S1 ($800-$999) after looking into making my own and adding up the hours it might take (way too much). So far I have been very pleased with it. I have it plugged into a old pc/tv tuner and it works great for daily usage and the bulbs are cheap ($150 Street). I was too lazy to make or purchase a screen so the wall with the white lead paint will do for now.... ;-)

    1. Re:Epson S1 gets the job done by misterpies · · Score: 1


      I agree - the S1 is a great machine for the price. Picture quality is excellent, it's bright enough to throw a decent picture on a white wall (remember, a projector screen will set you back a few hundred bucks more), no rainbow effect (since it's LCD). It's a bit bigger than I expected but since I use it for home theatre, not as a corporate road warrior, that doesn't matter much.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  14. Slashdotted by TheJavaGuy · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here is a link to a cached version of the Geocities page that has been slashdotted.

    --
    Opera Watch - An Opera browser blog.
    1. Re:Slashdotted by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, and here is a link to the eBay search. Oh, and this is the submitter's website. Oh, and why not this here, it's a link to this very story!

      C'mon, if the parent deserves +3 informative, so do I!

      --
      ~ Aero
    2. Re:Slashdotted by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      You forgot a link to the parent poster like this. Now I'll reap the +5 Informative. Or the -1 Overrated...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  15. well, on the bright side... by neye_eve · · Score: 1

    Even slashdot won't look so dreary and washed out after spending some time in front of a makeshift projector-based home theater :p

  16. This might help by BagOBones · · Score: 5, Informative

    I found this site to be very helpfull when picking out a projector.

    http://www.projectorcentral.com

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    1. Re:This might help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod up, that link goes hand-in-hand w/avsforum.

  17. Projector for Home Theatre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just recently set up my home theatre system with an InFocus X1 projector for about $1k and a $350 portable pull down screen. The color/sharpness is great day or night. I looked online and still wound up buying at Best Buy when it went on sale.

  18. "Movie-like?" by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why not go with the real thing? Super 8 all the way!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  19. ProjectorCentral has reviews, FAQs, etc. by Heffe+Llama · · Score: 4, Informative

    Great stuff available here:

    ProjectorCentral

    I've thought about this, and I wouldn't build my own for the same reason I won't put a DVR computer near my TV -- the fan noise and the esthetics.

    1. Re:ProjectorCentral has reviews, FAQs, etc. by radish · · Score: 1

      You know you can build a HTPC which is silent and looks better than most hifi components, if you're willing to spend the $$$. I just bought an Ahanix case (look them up - they are specifically designed to look like high end hifi/home theater units), coupled with a fanless mobo & gfx card, a near silent zalman cpu fan, seagate barracude disk it should be basically silent. I have similar gear in my main desktop pc and I have to look at the power light to tell if it's on or not.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:ProjectorCentral has reviews, FAQs, etc. by J+Isaksson · · Score: 1

      And what power supply did you use? I've still never been able to find an even decently quiet one, and the Ahanix cases mostly seem to come without one.

    3. Re:ProjectorCentral has reviews, FAQs, etc. by radish · · Score: 1

      Ahanix sell PSU's to go with their cases. I have the Dvine6SQ case, which has a matching "media pack" containing a VFD display, IR sensor, remote & PSU. The PSU is rated at about 400W I think, and is labelled as 14dBA (!). According to reviews it's the quietest PSU available, but in exchange you have to be careful with heat. In my main desktop I use a Nexus NX3000 which really is quiet. 18dbA at idle, 19 under load. I really can't hear it running unless my ear's up against the fan.

      Check out these guys to buy and these guys for reviews.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  20. Similar question...how to get longer bulb life? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have several customers who desire big display screens (like how they always do in movies and TV) so they can monitor the status of certain things.

    Currently, we use a lot of old NEC 29" monitors which haven't been made in 10 years and are going away for good. I've talked about replacing them with rear-projection systems, by putting a cloth or plastic across the opening for the CRT and parking a projector behind it to display.

    There's just one problem...virtually every projector under the sun measures bulb life in "hundreds of hours". At $300/ea this is not going to work as a monitoring display. Plus, we can't really turn them off because if someone needs to look at it, you apparently can't just turn them back on until the cooldown cycle has finished.

    What's the solution here? Is there any way possible to use standard (read low cost) lighting in a projection system? I think these bulbs must be so costly and delicate because they have to fit in a tiny projection unit. If size/portability isn't an issue...what other options are there?

    Could I get a couple of 150watt incandenscent bulbs, throw them through a polarizing filter and shine them through, say a gutted laptop display? I seem to remember that back in the beginning of time (the early 90s) the only way to do LCD projection was to lay some kind of LCD panel over an existing off-the-shelf overhead projector. Do they still make these things? Can they be modified to work with other light sources (given that overhead projector bulbs are no bargain either)

    This also has to do with the home theater question, because if you watch a lot of movies or TV shows, you're going to find youself using a bulb or two each year and that's not cheap.

    - JoeShmoe
    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    1. Re:Similar question...how to get longer bulb life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEC currently manufactures 30" and 40" LCD displays. It would seem like the 30" one is potentially a drop in replacement. See the 30" one here.

    2. Re:Similar question...how to get longer bulb life? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

      LCD is simply too costly right now. Granted, these 29" monitors are no bargain, but they are still under $1000. To get a comparable LCD display is more like $3000-4000. So they aren't really an option for replacements.

      You can get LCD projectors for less than $1000 (800x600, which is good enough) ...Dell 2100MP, the Epson H1something...whatever's on sale on pricewatch.

      Once you go beyond 20" in the LCD realm, the price/size ratio seems to jump sharply and every extra inch throws several hundreds of dollars onto the price. A 20" Dell is $900...a 21" NEC is $1600...A Samsung 24" is $2600...etc.

      We've even tried using big off-the-shelf CRT TV sets like Sony VEGA plus a scan convertor. However, these look terrible even at the lowest 640x480 resolution and TV's seem especially susceptible to "Burn-in". We had an NEC monitor show the same picture for months on end with no problem, yet three weeks in, the expensive Sony was ruined by bright white lettering.

      - JoeShmoe
      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    3. Re:Similar question...how to get longer bulb life? by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1

      What resolution do you need? You can buy buy large monitors that do low res reasonably cheap - eg. Wells Gardner do 27 and 33 inch display monitors for the arcade game market.

    4. Re:Similar question...how to get longer bulb life? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

      This is a good idea, however, don't these kind of monitors require some kind of funky non-standard video interface? I vaguely remember people building MAME cabinets out of old arcade games having to do something to get a computer signal on the arcade monitor.

      Resolution-wise, people need to be able to read it from across the room so we actually try to avoid large resolution with corresponding tiny font sizes. 800x600 at the most and 640x480 would be perfectly acceptible.

      However, I wonder if these arcade monitors would be interlaced like a TV set? That's what causes us a problem using regular TV sets. Scan convertors don't work so well we find. Even the slightest jitter makes reading text onscreen too difficult and headache-inducing. "Monitors" even though they can be interlaces, are almost always non-interlaced in at least the lowest standard resolution of 640x480.

      Nevertheless, I will look into this, thanks!

      - JoeShmoe
      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    5. Re:Similar question...how to get longer bulb life? by Bad_Feeling · · Score: 1

      You raise a good point on bulb life. I think if i were to ever build/buy a projector, i would put in some sort of a secondary cooling system. Maybe replace the stock fan with a more powerful one. Or add a metal heat sink to the bulb. Either one will increase life, I think. I'm sure there is some nut case out there already that has installed water cooling.

      Also buying a very powerful bulb and then running it at a lower power level (somehow) will yield a big boost in its rated lifestand.

      --
      Disclaimer: On the other hand, I am kind of a psycho...
    6. Re:Similar question...how to get longer bulb life? by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1

      They have a 15 pin dsub connector and do "VGA" resolutions with refresh rates up to 90hz. So it sounds like they wont look interlaced... full specs here

    7. Re:Similar question...how to get longer bulb life? by system_trader · · Score: 1

      Why must projector bulbs be small, bright and expensive?

      In short because the condenser lens (between the light source and LCD/DLP) is not big enough to handle a larger, less expensive light source.

      Given size (cost) constraints on the LCD or DLP imaging element and projection and condensing lenses, a proportionately compact and bright source is required. This allows efficient coupling of the light source to the imaging element, achieving full filling of the focal plane (lens aperture) and maximum optical resolution at the projection screen. A larger light source with the same sized imaging element will require a bigger, more expensive condenser lens and mirror, possibly several additional large lenses. A spatial filter can also be used (like a pinhole camera) to boost resolution at the expense of wasted light and heat.

      With size, weight and initial cost being the primary concerns, it isn't surprising that projectors ended up with highly consumable light sources.

      If you replace the expensive bulbs with a cheaper bulb of the same size the picture will simply be dimmer, and at the same resolution.

    8. Re:Similar question...how to get longer bulb life? by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      See my other post in this thread. I'm using $30 bulbs with good results.

      The situation you discuss is even easier; you can use a fresnel lens itself as the projection lens... just shine the light straight through the LCD (the overhead projector LCDs are still being made and work great), then use a fresnel to blow up the virtual image to the correct size...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    9. Re:Similar question...how to get longer bulb life? by sysadmn · · Score: 1

      There are many 27 inch CRT televisions out there that will display 800x600; they're typically around a grand. Look for a dealer that sells to schools. If you're willing to spend more, CRT HDTV monitors run ~$1200. Some take SVGA input. Both are cheaper than most projectors, especially if you factor in bulb life. If you don't need to read it from across the room, you don't need a projector.

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
  21. Ebay can be expensive.... by rjelks · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think if you know what you are looking for, Ebay can be a good source....but, remember that those bulbs can cost a few hundred to replace. Homebrew could give you decent results. I'm not sure if you set up a nice room you'd want a homebrew in the theatre room. Computer projectors are getting cheaper ($1500.00 range these days) and might be a good solution, especially if you are thinking about a HTPC. If you are even close to the $3,000.00 mark, I'd start looking into some plasma or LCD displays. With flat panel displays getting cheaper, the prospect of a projection screen becomes less and less desireable to me. To be honest, if I were looking at over $1,000, I'd rather get a HDTV. I think most a/v geeks would be disappointed with the homebrew approach to projectors. If you like DIY projects though, it could be fun.

    1. Re:Ebay can be expensive.... by bcboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ebay can be expensive but perhaps even more importantly, digital video projector prices are dropping *very* quickly. A quote from projectorcentral:

      To put it in perspective, it might be helpful to compare the Z2 to the Sharp XV-Z9000. That DLP unit came out two years ago at a price of $11,000 and was heralded as an outstanding achievement. Like the Z2 it had 1280x720 resolution and an 800 ANSI lumen rating. And at the time people were blown away by the Z9000's dazzling contrast--rated at 1100:1. The fact is you would not be far off to think of the Z2 as better-performing Sharp Z9000 for one-fifth the price.

      ... with the technology changing this fast it doesn't make a lot of sense to buy on ebay. You'll save a bit on the retail cost and lose a wad on performance.

  22. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Talk about cognitive dissonance in a troll!
    What's it gonna be $699 or $1399?!!!

    "A man never stands to tall as when he stoops to trollbaiting..."

  23. HDTV is key by kajoob · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're going to be projecting you're going to lose a little clarity, so make sure you get an HDTV projector like a refurbed Piano HE-3100 HDTV projector for about a grand. Also, don't skimp on the screen you get, I recommend the Luxus Deluxe Screenwall - it has great reflective properties and microperf so you can put your center channel directly behind the center of the screen for the ultimate movie effect! Hope that helps.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    1. Re:HDTV is key by ev1lcanuck · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree, HDTV in a projector really matters. We have a Runco three gun HDTV projector and it's great. My only compaint is that sometimes you see some distortion when there are white images or red images such as text that are on black or dark backgrounds. I believe this is fairly common with most projectors though. Shop around, take some DVD of animated shows to test - something like Futurama or Family Guy that has really good sharp colour. Live action doesn't show off any flaws in a projector.

    2. Re:HDTV is key by Chris+Siegler · · Score: 1

      Also, don't skimp on the screen you get
      Glidden makes a paint color called "Misty Evening" that somebody at avsforum (where else?) found was the ideal color for LCD projection. The stuff really works and many people report their projections looking "3d" ish especially for animated movies. Best part is that it only costs $20 to find out!

  24. experiences? EXPERIENCES ?????? Whaaa by Retep+Vosnul · · Score: 0

    "What are Slashdotters' experiences? ."

    Well, Everytime a /.er or anybody else willing to share knowledge with just about anybody that can USE GOOGLE tries and sets up a nice site with the info on this some guy comes along and lets it get posted on the /. main page completely burning up the freakin data limit in 0.4 seconds.

    So frankly, we can't tell.
    come on , links to geosuburb ?

    ----------------
    beer is nice.

    --
    -- forget /. It's gone.
  25. google cache by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a link to the google cache of the geocities site. You'd think an EE would have more sense than this.

    Doesn't appear the site has anything useful anyway. I'd say go with a $500 - ~1k$ unit, if you can afford it. They seem to be of high enough quality for my liking, and should be able to get a good enough picture at a sufficient resolution for anyone but the most anal.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  26. my $2000 basement home theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative



    wanted an ht in my basement, where i can control the ambient light well.

    so I bought myself the sanyo plv-z1. vga/s-video/component inputs. decent brightness, contrast and resolution (yes, it supports hd). $1200 plus it came with a free 92" diag 16:9 screen.

    put another $800 into some very decent mid-range speakers and a/v receiver. now I've got the coolest home theater setup that most of my friends and neighbors have ever seen.

    everyone thinks i spent close to $10k, and their already dropped jaws hit the floor when i tell them it was 1/5th of that.

    also, a great resource for projector info can be found at http://www.projectorcentral.com.

  27. Depends on your tastes by boarder · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, the $300 will not work. Sure, they'll be able to play TV on the wall fine, but they'll look like ass. For normal res TV, you need at least 800x600 to look good. If you plan on playing DVDs or HDTV stuff, though, you need at least 1024x768. For true HD, though, 1280 is needed. All of the projectors will scale down a higher res image to their native res, but you don't want that. Also, most higher res stuff like DVD and HD are widescreen, but most lower end projectors are 4:3. Using those for widescreen wastes resolution and, from some things I've read, isn't good for the projector.

    You also need to worry about lumens depending on how dark your room is, lamp lifetime and cost, use for main TV or just a movie projector, fan noise, etc.

    I would suggest a high lumen, 1024x768 projector with a widescreen native lens. If you need HD and are concerned about image quality, go for the 1280 res ones. The jump in price is enormous, but you don't have to worry about scaling, and less worry about widescreen native lens.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
    1. Re:Depends on your tastes by bkakes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Keep in mind that full HD res is 1920x1080i, so you'll need more than 1280x768, if you want it.

      1280x768 will cover 720p (1280x720), but not 1080i. Just something to keep aware of.

    2. Re:Depends on your tastes by athorshak · · Score: 1

      Well there aren't any native 1920x1080 projectors out there right now for under $20k, so 720p is the only option (other than used CRT) right now.

    3. Re:Depends on your tastes by bkakes · · Score: 1

      Certainly a good point. I wasn't trying to be a dick; just pointing it out (it's also important to know the difference in case you have equipment that can't do 720p, and so forth...kind of a pain right now).

    4. Re:Depends on your tastes by Mateito · · Score: 1

      > Sure, they'll be able to play TV on the wall fine,
      > but they'll look like ass

      So, fine for porn then.

  28. Get an entry-level projector... by JMZero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Like a Epson Powerlite S1 or an Infocus X1. The picture will be infinitely better than what you'd get from a homebrew. Don't even consider the homebrew thing. Really. I've seen a few (based on CRT's or overhead projectors and LCD panels) and they are really poor.

    Despite what videophile reviewers or salespeople will say, these entry-level projectors create a very impressive picture under any reasonable lighting conditions. And if you can't make your room reasonably dark (ie. reading should be uncomfortable) then you shouldn't be getting a projector.

    I have an Epson Powerlite S1 ($900 US) in my basement theatre. Nobody that has seen it has been anything other than extremely impressed with the picture - even my brother who has a $12000 projector. Admittedly the picture isn't perfect in a videophile sense (and there's no optical zoom, so you'll want to measure things out) - but it is really very good (and as big as my wall would allow - about 11' diagonal). I'm projecting onto matte white paint. Again, it works just fine. I use my computer in there, play GameCube, watch movies - it's just really great.

    Unless you're looking to spend a fair bit more than $900, you won't get something nearly as good as one of these two. You could try used, but I doubt you'll find as good a deal.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    1. Re:Get an entry-level projector... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Moreover, whatever you get, in five years the tech will be vastly better. So spend $1000 now, and $1000 in five years for the equivalent of $5-10K now. Unless you try to run the thing full-time, the bulb cost shouldn't be more than ~1/2 the initial price.

      Is there any possibility of improved bulb technology, say LEDs or the like, or is the lumen output needed hard to achieve with anything other than traditional style bulbs?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  29. A homemade projector will NOT do the job by dlleigh · · Score: 4, Informative

    In fact, you probably won't even like a commercial projector unless it's very dark in the room or the projector is very bright (read "very expensive").

    Front projection has a big gotcha. Notice how white your screen is? That's as black as the projected image can ever be. Any stray light really messes up the contrast.

    Rear projection can provide much better contrast, but the systems are much larger and heavier.

    1. Re:A homemade projector will NOT do the job by neurocutie · · Score: 1

      what you say don't make sense... like saying, see this TV screen when it is OFF, that is how black (or white) it can ever be... a white wall with NO light illuminating it will be just as black as a black wall... rear projection can have just as much problem with stray light as front projection. in addition, it inherently MUST absorb light and re-scatter it in order to create an image plane, which means that there is a substantial light loss (otherwise just use a piece of clear glass as the screen ? whoops, no image). therefore rear projection tends to always appear darker, which you are spinning as "darker blacks", but really means, low "gain". furthermore, yeah everyone loves more contrast, but actually the problem with many projectors is often too much contrast, at least for movies. for computer display, one tends to like a lot of contrast to read text, etc. but to view images, too much contrast wrecks the images (and movies).

    2. Re:A homemade projector will NOT do the job by Analysis+Paralysis · · Score: 1
      The parent's post is technically incorrect but does make a very valid point - for front projection you have to reduce the ambient light levels to the extent that the projector screen does appear perfectly black (or as close to it as possible). Ideally, this would mean having a separate room (or basement or garage) solely for home cinema. While rear projectors can be affected by background light also, it has to fall on the screen itself to be a real problem (like direct sunlight does with CRTs).

      As for efficiency, both should be about equal - you have light going through a screen, being reflected and being dispersed in both cases. Rear projection's edge is that everything occurs within its enclosure, front projectors rely on an outside screen for reflection and dispersion.

      The choice between the two should come down to whether or not the room is to be dedicated to home cinema with tight control on ambient light (curtains closed, lights off). If so then front projection's greater size rules. For a multi-purpose living room where closing the curtains just to watch the Simpsons is impractical, rear projection or plasma should be considered.

      Some people get both types for this reason, a front projector for films and a standard CRT/plasma for "normal" TV viewing.

  30. Ghetto projector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just made me a crt projector costing about $60 and it's quite good for what I use it for. YMMV.

    Pawn shop 13" tv, fresnel lens from barnes and noble, and cardboard black box.

  31. Homebrew sounds great by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2

    I think a homebrew would do well in this situation. My personal favorites are stouts and Belgian dubbel ales, though you may find another style that -- oh, we're talking about projectors!

  32. GET AN X1 by gearwhore · · Score: 1

    Infocus X1 is a really cheap and nice DLP Projector, can be had under $1000. easy to set up, easy to use. no fuss.

  33. DLP's start at $1500ish.. by adamgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    $1500 is about the entry price for DLP HD projectors (retail), iirc. a $300 projector.. is not going to look any better than a $300 tv.. and might look worse.

    I would suggest demo'ing whatever you go with, /before/ you buy it. any of the DLP projectors should yield very nice results.

  34. Ongoing costs and daytime viewing by elitman · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're likely going to see many opinions in this thread, but here are - from my perspective - the most salient points from my experience.

    The first is the ongoing cost of maintenance. With any projection device, you'll need to occasionally replace the bulb - in many cases, this works out to a new bulb every 500-1000 hours. For my InFocus LP330, new bulbs cost me $150-200 each.

    The second point is daytime viewing. Light output of projectors is measured in lumens, with the higher the number representing higher light output. For daytime viewing, anything under 1000 lumens is essentially useless in all but the darkest of rooms. A good, reflective screen will help a bit, but if you're planning to put the projector in a room that gets a lot of sunlight, you'll want to either invest in a brighter projector or some black-out drapes for the room. The latter option may be less expensive.

    1. Re:Ongoing costs and daytime viewing by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Two points:

      Not all projectors are rates for 500-100 hours! The H30 in economy mode, for example, is rated at 3000 hours. In economy mode in a dark room I turn the brightness DOWN to get a normal picture.

      Home theatre via front projection is all about a darkened room. If you don't have good light control front projection is probably not a good option. Even an expensive projector will look pretty lousy in the full light of day.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
    2. Re:Ongoing costs and daytime viewing by Hangman+Jim+99 · · Score: 1

      I too have an Infocus DLP projector - and haven't had to replace the blub yet. Where do you get yours?

      --
      --- I hate my sig
  35. just buy the ebay projector... by neurocutie · · Score: 1

    An Infocus LP 330 runs about $400, an LP335 about $500 and an LP350 about $700. If you time is worth anything at all, just get one of those. I personally use a LP350 and there is just no way I would attempt to build one of these myself (includes lots of fancy video processing chips, line doubler, etc). Just the high-pressure lamp to get 1000-2000 lumen output itself costs a couple hundred. While you're at it, if you see a spare bulb on ebay for the projector you get, it is well worth it to pick it up. The LP350 bulb is good for 2000 hours. The kids love the thing and it is something that I trust them to operate, unlike any probable homemade projector.

  36. .........pssssst by rjelks · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hey, come here. If you want "homebrew", I'll sell you plans to make a 100 inch projector for $10 worth of parts.

    Seriously, has anyone ever bought one of those "fresnel lens kits" off ebay? You can post anonymously to tell us about it.

  37. Ok quality from homebrew by my2commoncents · · Score: 2, Informative

    I picked up a overhead projector and one of those LCD screens, and I got watchable results for a meager $150. You can make it brighter by using a metal halide as a light source and a lens instead of the overhead projector, though that will run another $50-70. As good as homebrews are, they can never beat commercial ones in terms of color and quality. The best images I've heard of come from DLP's. The problem with any commercial projectors is that bulbs are really expensive ($300-400 a pop). This forum has a lot of good information, as well as homebrew results.

  38. Buy, don't build by jrj102 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You'll be a lot happier with a bottom of the line projector than anything home-brew... especially if you're talking about a modern DLP projector. Much has been done in the last couple years to improve the quality of projectors-- take advantage of it.

    I recommend scouring ebay-- take your time-- for a good deal on a projector manufactured in the last year or two. They retail at about a grand to start, so $300-500 on ebay should be possible.

  39. Results of my search by Teppy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I did the same thing recently. After much research, I concluded that the $1000 InFocus X1 was an especially good value: It uses DLP technology which doesn't burn-in if you play lots of games, and is quite bright (1100 Lumens). I just took a trip to their site, and see that they now have an X2 which ups the brightness a bit for the same price. They also don't rape you quite as bad as other companies for new bulbs. The only downside to this projector is the 800x600 resolution.

    BTW, on the subject of games - playing on one of these is videogame ecstasy. Definitely plan to invest in wireless controllers for each of your consoles.

    1. Re:Results of my search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Note that the X2 is not IMO suitable for a HT environemnt since it doesn't have the faroudja deinterlacer chip. Bascially Infocus found out that the cheap X1 was eating their profits, which they were hoping to gain from the more expensive HT 4800 HT projector. So, the X2 is not a good HT projector, it is strictly for computer/powerpoint presentations and the 4805 is marketed as the new home-theather option.

  40. What I use by Qumefox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm doing this at my house, and my living room isn't that big. I bought a Benq pb6100 new for this. It's only 800x600 but it's 1500 lumen and DLP. It looks nice in my opinion, and they only run $1000-1200 new. It also has an economy mode that lets you squeeze 3000 hours out of the lamp. I use a light grey 73" pulldown window shade from lowes for a screen though, and i've never had a problem with room lights, and the grey offers great contrast. Just my two cents

  41. Re:How about a home brew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh, the American way!

    Bush: I bomb whoever the fuck I feel like bombing.

  42. Just bought mine... by barfy · · Score: 1

    NEC has one of the best home theater projectors in the sub 10's of thousand dollar range the HT1000. It has been replaced by the HT1100.

    This projector has been on the top of most folks most recommended list for the past year or so. You can look it up on the avs forums.

    They listed for 4995 originally (and that was a blow out price for the performance of the projector). But it is currently being phased out, and can be purchased at really good prices but they are extremely limited. Many home theater providers are out of them, but they can still be had... You can get one for 2625 at triocomputers.com, which was a good enough deal I just bought one.

    But... The 1100 is out, and can be purchased in the 3800 dollar range and has a few nice features, but also has a 200 dollar upgrade for an anamorphic lens (which goes for 1100-1800 bucks ordinarally). This allows you to show a wide screen display, but still use all of the pixels in the projector. This results in about a 20% improvment in brightness, better sharpness, and much less visibility of individual pixels.

    But the HT1000, is a more than satisfactory projector, indeed it is one of the best home theater projectors available in the below 10k price range, and at 2625 is a steal.

  43. X1 is Rocktastic by sjf · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine that a homebrew would offer the variety of inputs that any commercial projector would: NTSC/PAL/VGA/XVGA s-video, composite, component, etc..

    Also, setting up even a commercial projector is a complete PITA: keystone, focus, etc... this would be doubly so: consider, commercial projectors typically have remote controls and electronic adjustments. Unlikely to be true for any home made system.

    Having said that. The X1 is a magnificent beast. Accepts any signal you might want to throw at it. The image quality is awesome. In, my opinion well worth the $999. Take a look at a dealer. You'll buy one.

    -Simon

  44. I did it by Mudcathi · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I purchased a nice used Boxlight XP-55m for only $600 on eBay. It has native XGA resolution. Purchased a 10 foot diagonal glass bead screen for $125 plus shipping from DaLite. Had to build my own mahogany entertainment center, because they just don't sell 'em with projection screens in mind. $75 worth of black flannel cloth from Walmart, $2 worth of shower curtain rings, and a couple of 1" oak dowels turned into theater curtains with upper/lower masks. Total cost of entertainment center materials was under $600, so the whole project has come in under $2000 - but looks like a lot, lot more. Also, I'm not sure why but DVD's look best when played back from a computer. I'm comparing our DVD's svideo connection to our computer's DVI-out port (with a DVI-to-SVGA adaptor), but the clarity is nonetheless superior.

    Plus, it looks way cool to play Age of Mythology on such a big screen :)

    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

  45. Careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a used projector for $300 ish awhile ago.
    It was great! I loved it!! There were a few dust spots tho.. Found a place in town that said they'd clean it for $80.

    I said great!

    They cleaned it, and ruined one of my LCD panels. Then they said it looked like that when I brought it in.

    I couldn't prove otherwise. After all, it was used and I hadn't shown anyone else the picture before I took it in..

    Used is used..

    The X1 is getting good reviews. So is Dell's 2200 model at around $900. I'm leaning towards one of those, probably the Dell..

    p.s. I gave the "ruined" projector ot a friend at work, he said Unreal looks great on the wall with the wrong colors from the broken LCD panel.. :)

  46. fun for mame? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1, Funny

    This might be fun for a 50 foot space invaders romp!

    =)

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  47. Projector by greenhell9 · · Score: 1

    I tried to build the projector from those very same plans, and I have nearly completed it. The last element to get is the 5" LCD, which is harder to find than you might think (and hard to find CHEAP)... anyway, the idea seems sound, I even tested it by ripping the LCD out of a $2 calculator and shining a flash light through it. However, never finishing the projector I cant say as to how well it actually works... sorry.

  48. Incorrect... by JMZero · · Score: 3, Informative

    virtually every projector under the sun measures bulb life in "hundreds of hours"

    Most new consumer projectors will have bulb lives of around 3000 hours. Many also feature low pressure bulbs that can be replaced for around $200. Are you sure you've researched this at all?

    This also has to do with the home theater question, because if you watch a lot of movies or TV shows, you're going to find youself using a bulb or two each year and that's not cheap.

    Again, this is overstated. If you used your projector for 4 hours a day (and I don't know anyone who would do this), one bulb would last about two years in most new consumer projectors.

    If you're the kind of person who watches more than 4 hours of TV a day, I indeed wouldn't recommend a projector. I'd recommend surgery.

    Can they be modified to work with other light sources (given that overhead projector bulbs are no bargain either)

    There's a reason projectors (overhead or video) use fancy bulbs. They need lots of brightness and even lighting. There's probably lots of options available if you're willing to have a horrible picture - but I think I'd prefer to spend $100 a year on bulbs (assuming 4hr/day use).

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    1. Re:Incorrect... by JoeShmoe · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most new consumer projectors will have bulb lives of around 3000 hours. Many also feature low pressure bulbs that can be replaced for around $200

      Dell 2100MP = 2000 hours = $379.98/bulb. That's an example of a consumer ranged projector. Maybe Dell is doing the "cheap razor, expensive blades" thing, but they certainly aren't alone. I'd love to hear an example of a projector with replacement bulbs that cost less than $200, although if the projector itself costs $6000 that may explain something.

      If you used your projector for 4 hours a day (and I don't know anyone who would do this), one bulb would last about two years

      Okay, so 20 hundred hours is technically two thousand, but...compare that to the 20000 hours you'll get from a fluorescent light source. Halogens (which I think is what these projectors use) run hot, and can be very delicate. I think they even have long-life incandesents that last 5000 or so.

      I doubt, serious doubt, that most people are going to get full life expectancy from their projection bulbs. Why else would they only be waranteed for 90 days when the projector itself is waranteed for a year or more? Maybe turning them on and off is stressful on the bulbs...in which case, are you going to get full life in any real world scenario?

      I'd like for someone to point out some real world data on bulb life before they make the blanket statement that someone trying to save a couple hundred dollars on a projection system for his home shouldn't worry about blowing the money saved the first year for a new bulb.

      There's a reason projectors (overhead or video) use fancy bulbs. They need lots of brightness and even lighting.

      My living room needs a lot of brightness and lighting. My car needs a lot of brightness and lighting. But I don't pay $200/bulb to keep either supplied. As I said, I think a significant portion of the cost is that they need a small package. I can buy a 500Watt halogen for my floor standing torch lamp for what...$20? That's got to be just about as bright as whatever's in your average consumer projector. So why does it cost $20 in a lamp and $200 in a projector. The bulb isn't doing anything technological! It's a light source, period.

      So, explain why I can't use a cheaper light source that is just as bright if I don't need it necessarily to fit into a itty bitty plastic case?

      - JoeShmoe
      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    2. Re:Incorrect... by athorshak · · Score: 4, Informative

      My living room needs a lot of brightness and lighting. My car needs a lot of brightness and lighting. But I don't pay $200/bulb to keep either supplied. As I said, I think a significant portion of the cost is that they need a small package. I can buy a 500Watt halogen for my floor standing torch lamp for what...$20? That's got to be just about as bright as whatever's in your average consumer projector. So why does it cost $20 in a lamp and $200 in a projector. The bulb isn't doing anything technological! It's a light source, period.

      This is so completely uninformed it is reduculous. Its clear you have not actually researched the issue. There is a HUGE difference between your $20 floor lamp bulb and a projector bulb. There is quite a bit of engineering that goes into making projector bulbs because thay need a very specific spectra of output. Your floor lamp does not put out anything close to 6500k light (video standard). Put your lamp bulb in a projector and you will have a projector that will be impossible to calibrate to any sort of decent color balance.

    3. Re:Incorrect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read fucker, he said "EVEN"

      Say it with me, EVEN LIGHTING. Checked the light on the pavement in front of ur car? Not even. Your living room doesn't need projector type brightness and lighting.

      Go home!!!

    4. Re:Incorrect... by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

      So, you're telling me that no one has considered making a projection bulb that costs 10x less even though it doesnn't have the same color temperature? That nothing could be done to the video image (add more blue, whatever) to compensate for a warmer color source? Didn't the world have this problem with fluorscent lighting being too cool to provide a natural color balance? Yet, we apparently have figured that one out since they use fluorscents for even bathrooms lighting nowadays.

      Hell, my LCD monitor gives me a choice of three color temperatures (aside from of course, choose your own RGB mix style) so, I don't think the world is as married to 6500K light as you suggest. Maybe no one's gonna be use it for PANTONE color matching but to put Cheaper By the Dozen on your living room wall, is it really that important? Speaking of which, unless you are using a specially coated project screen, you are probably throwing picture quality out the window anyway.

      Regardless, I'm still seeking information about cheaper lighting options for LCD projection...since all I have to display is 16 colors at most, I really wouldn't care if they were all shades of puce if it cost what my floor lamp cost me.

      - JoeShmoe
      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    5. Re:Incorrect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's impossible to get even lighting from a single (point) light source anyway. I should know, Im a director of photography (you americans say "cinematographer")

      Who's the fucker now?

    6. Re:Incorrect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever used a photo enlarger? They also use special lightbulbs that produce even light from a point source. I guess it can do this because it only has to illuminate a small rectangle, rather than a whole room. If you use a normal incandescent bulb in an enlarger, be prepared for unevenly exposed prints that look like crap.

    7. Re:Incorrect... by athorshak · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not saying that projector bulb prices aren't inflated, but they are certainly a LONG way from your floor lamp analogy.

      So you only need to project 16 colors, do you really thing there is ANY market for a projector like that? Generally speaking a projector is going to cost at least $1000 or so, why would you spend that kind of money and put a cheap ass bulb in it that can't produce a good image?

      I never said the world was "married" to 6500k, only that is the video standard and most projectors at least try to offer something reasonably close to that.

      I've heard a GE engineer say that their projector bulbs cost about 10 times as much to produce than a regular lamp of the same wattage. Add this to the fact they they are shipped in a MUCH lower volume and walla, high price.

      If you want a crappy bulb for your projector, fine, but most of us want to get the best image possible. I'd be ecstatic if bulb prices came down significantly, but I won't pretend that its a simple issue where the manufacturer is simply ripping us off.

    8. Re:Incorrect... by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      There's a reason projectors (overhead or video) use fancy bulbs. They need lots of brightness and even lighting.

      My living room needs a lot of brightness and lighting. My car needs a lot of brightness and lighting.


      Even lighting. Point your car headlights at a wall or garage door and observe the pattern. It's not even pretending to be an even light distribution. Your living room lights are somewhat similar, but more importantly they don't have the proper spectrum to accurately, consistently represent colors.

      Projector bulbs are high-precision instruments. Car headlights and living room lamp bulbs simply aren't.

    9. Re:Incorrect... by boinger · · Score: 0, Troll
      You think fluorescent lighting is 'okay' (to paraphrase)?

      God help you.

      And, if you're dressing yourself under that lighting, God help anyone who has to be seen with you and your heinously mis-matched clothing.

      --
      Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
    10. Re:Incorrect... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that those tiny bulbs that projectors use are probably engineered to run cooler than a standard halogen (even though they do still run hot).

      I imagine that using a standard halogen would melt the LCD in a short amount of time.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    11. Re:Incorrect... by jyoull · · Score: 1

      My supa-cheap photo enlarger used a fairly ordinary incandescent bulb and a diffuser (or was it a condenser, now i forget) and I won plenty of awards with those prints. I'm looking at one of them now.

      Granted it takes a lot less light to expose a photographic print than to project Terminator on a bedsheet hanging from the wall, but there are ways to massage the light into something even enough to not gross anyone out.

      While you're on the subject and all authoritative-like, why are similar bulbs for, say, Kodak slide projectors, only priced at around $15 now (and maybe $50 when they were actually in demand)? Seems to me a slide projection light source would have characteristics similar to that of a video projector, no? (yes, including color temperature which is a function of the gassy stuff in the bulb)

    12. Re:Incorrect... by system_trader · · Score: 1

      You wrote: "Your floor lamp does not put out anything close to 6500k light... Put your lamp bulb in a projector and you will have a projector that will be impossible to calibrate to any sort of decent color balance." That isn't the issue either. Flat panel fluorescent backlights and other technologies put out uniform light with great color balance. Furthermore, filters can be used to shape the source and adjust color balance. The issue is the compactness (light source density) being high enough yet proportionately sized with respect to the projecting and condensing lenses and the LCD/DLP imaging element. A big projector can use a bigger, cheaper light bulb given the same desired screen size.

    13. Re:Incorrect... by system_trader · · Score: 5, Informative

      You wrote: "Your floor lamp does not put out anything close to 6500k light... Put your lamp bulb in a projector and you will have a projector that will be impossible to calibrate to any sort of decent color balance."

      That isn't the issue either.

      Flat panel fluorescent backlights and other technologies put out uniform light with great color balance. Furthermore, filters can be used to shape the source and adjust color balance.

      The issue is the compactness (light source density) being high enough yet proportionately sized with respect to the projecting and condensing lenses and the LCD/DLP imaging element. A big projector can use a bigger, cheaper light bulb given the same desired screen size.

    14. Re:Incorrect... by sylvandb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not saying that projector bulb prices aren't inflated, but they are certainly a LONG way from your floor lamp analogy.

      Really? OK, maybe his analogy ($20 for a 500w floor lamp bulb) which makes the projector bulb only 10x to 20x as expensive. But if he really pays anywhere near $20 for a simple 500w halogen bulb, he is getting taken.

      In reality, I buy 500w halogen bulbs for less than $1/ea, and they put out visually the same color of light as the $5-$10 GE bulbs and seem to last about the same hours (usually physical shock takes them out before the wear out). So you are telling me that something justifies 200x to 400x the price, which seems to be the typical range for the mid-grade LCD and DLP projectors? Or do you think 20x to 40x is justified, and the other 10x is just an "inflated" price?

      Given the science of light color in a halogen bulb, I find it nearly impossible to imagine any justification for a 200x to 400x price delta even if 10x or 100x of it was inflation. A halogen light isn't rocket science, is it? It wasn't when I was taking my stage lighting classes 20+ years ago...

      The bulb envelope must be quartz to withstand the heat, and the color of that quartz filters the color of light from the filament. The temperature of the filament determines the color it produces, and that temperature is primarily determined by the available current at the applied voltage. The halogen in the envelope helps the evaporating tungsten from the filament deposit back onto the filament instead of onto the envelope, but it isn't 100% effective so the envelope gradually darkens, and the filament develops a thin spot, and that leads to the death of the bulb.

      I wonder how much it would add to the cost of the projector to use a little sensor to detect the color of the light, and a bit of active control to adjust the current thru the filament to change the temperature?

      Of course it couldn't compensate 100% for flaws in a cheap bulb or the effects of bulb wear, but surely with $200 to $400 to play with, it could do a lot.

      sdb

    15. Re:Incorrect... by b0bby · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that part of the extra cost of projector bulbs was that there's a precisely aligned reflector built on, so no alignment has to be done by the end user. How much extra that adds, I don't know...

    16. Re:Incorrect... by Bigman · · Score: 1

      Weeel I guess thats one good thing about being a goth... You can get dressed in a disco and not worry about colour match!!

      But the thing that I don't understand, is that provided the colour of the lighiting in the room is not too strongly tinted, after a few minutes, all the colours look normal. Even flourescent light, which has a fairly strong green tint. It's because your eyes do an automatic white balance for you. So why is it so important to get exactly the right 'colour temperature' - especially for watching films?

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    17. Re:Incorrect... by Sarkoon · · Score: 1

      So ok, i don't care about color balance. How do i get one of these $20 bulbs to fit in my projector?

    18. Re:Incorrect... by Bigman · · Score: 1

      Car headlights are deliberately trying to not have an even light distribution - that's what all those pretty patterns in the headlamp cover are for.

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    19. Re:Incorrect... by beesquee · · Score: 1

      I really think that the prices are a little excessive here, is the production cost of projector bulbs that much greater? or in this another inkjet scenario? I wish someone could come up with a projector mod the allows the use cheaper (but capable) bulbs refocused into the projector

      --
      Things are not as they appear, nor are they otherwise
    20. Re:Incorrect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halogens (which I think is what these projectors use) run hot, and can be very delicate. I think they even have long-life incandesents that last 5000 or so.


      No, most of the projectors actually use true HID's, HPS in fact (I used to do AV work a few years ago, and our projectors (infocus) all used 250W HPS lamps). This is also why the projectors require the "warm-up" phase, as HPS lights take a little while to get to maximum brightness. As to why HPS and not halogen, I am not sure. However, if I had to guess, I would throw a shot at overall efficiency, and colour spectrum. On the plus side, if you got sick of watching movies, you could always grow some weed!!

    21. Re:Incorrect... by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Car headlights are deliberately trying to not have an even light distribution - that's what all those pretty patterns in the headlamp cover are for.

      The "pretty patterns" aren't so much to not get an even light distribution as to shape and focus the beam. I'm pretty sure the designers don't care very much about small irregularities in the headlight beam, so long as the beam is directed in the proper direction and maintains good overall brightness.

  49. A quick breakdown by athorshak · · Score: 5, Informative

    As another poster mentioned, the best place to go is the AVSForum. However, here is a quick breakdown of your options.

    I would not suggest rolling a DIY projector, you will get much higher quality image from a basic manufactured unit. Entry level is around $1000 at the moment, a couple thousand for a native HD unit. (You can find cheaper stuff in the used market).

    There are four primary technologies being used in frong projecttion right now:

    LCD - Cheap, but generally considered a good value. Lower contrast and more screendoor than other technologies, but can still look pretty good. You can get a nice 1280x720 (720p) LCD projector for about $2000. Check out the Panasonic AE500 or the Sanyo Z2. Sony's HS20 is also nice for a little more money. Lesser expensive LCDs are available but generally throw relatively poor images (IMHO).

    DLP - Very popular right now. Generally provides a better picture than LCD. Limited to 720p for now. A true 16x9 HD DLP projector will run you more than an LCD. Probably looking at at around $4000 minimum to over $10000. The BenQ 8700 is a GREAT value at the moment. Lower priced DLPs are also available, all the way to $999 for the InFocus X1. These lower priced DLPs are generally not high-def and most 4x3, instead of 16x9. Use of an anamorphic lense can turn them into native 16x9 projectors, but adds cost and complexity.

    DLPs have the best contrast of current consumer projectors by a good margin. One thing to be carful of is that a some of people see rainbows or get headaches when watching DLPs. This is less of an issue on newer models with a faster color wheel, but may be an issue on less expensive models. Check out brands like BenQ, InFocus, NEC, Marantz, Dwin, Sim2 for good DLP projectors.

    LCOS - This is the technology of choice for JVC. It has lower contrast than DLP but throws a smoother image due to its higher fill-factor. Its often described as very "film-like". Can support higher resolutions than DLP for now. A lot of the current LCOS projectors are large and not very user friendly. There are some more players entering the LCOS market, including Sony, with a native 1080p device, but it quite expensive. I'm not quite as up-to-date on LCOS projectors as DLP and LCD, but its worth a look.

    CRT - The grandaddy of projection. CRT can throw a wonderful image, altough digitals are catching up quickly. Manufacturers aren't really making them anymore so most are found in the used market. They are big, HEAVY, and require lot s of maintenence. They are also generally dimmer than digitals.

  50. My Experiences by bobej1977 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I bought an Optoma EzPro 732 from BestBuy for $900 (after $180 rebate) for the same purpose. I've been quite happy with it overall with only a few gripes:
    • At 800x600 resolution you can visibly see the pixels. There are visible gridlines with on a 120' screen if you stand about 3 feet away. People who visit mainly don't notice it though.
    • You'll need an absolutely dark room to watch it during the day with good quality. Plan to buy heavy drapes for any offending windows.
    • Not enough inputs. My projector uses the VGA connector and a dongle to connect Component video. This sucks if you want to hook your computer up along with your AV equipment. Map out your input needs before shopping, or you'll end up buying an expensive receiver to manage it all.
    And a couple words of caution on projectors in general:
    • The fans can be rather loud. If you plan to have it sitting right next to you, plan on having the stereo up. The DB level is somewhat higher than your average computer.
    • Plan to buy new lamps on a yearly basis. My projector lamp is rated at 2000 hours, and it will actually visibly start to dim at about 75% that. Lamps usually cost several hundred dollars. This would be a big concern with eBay stuff.
    • If you have a nice clean wall with a slightly irregular surface, don't bother with a screen. I spent $300 and my wall still looks better (although it does brighten up the picture in the daytime).
    All in all, I will never ever buy a TV again. My $900 projector has a bigger/better picture than any $1000 TV. Next time I buy though, I'll go for more lumens, higher resolution, and seperate component and VGA inputs.
    --
    The meek shall inherit the earth, in 3 by 6 plots. - Lazerus Long
    1. Re:My Experiences by SnappleMaster · · Score: 1

      Being able to see the gridlines is called "screen door effect". SDE is a problem with DLP/LCD projectors. The general rule of thumb is to view the image from at least 1.5 (1.8-2.0 is better) times the screen size. If you get closer, you will see SDE.

      You can also de-focus the lense just a tiny bit to blur out SDE a little bit, but personally I prefer to have the image sharp and sit further way.

      --
      Be happy. Nothing else matters.
  51. Some tips... by dafz1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recently got an Infocus 4800, and here are some bits of advice.

    1. Get as much native resolution as you can, at least 1024 x 768.

    2. Don't get too crazy with lumens. The people who do installs say most projectors need between 600 and 800 lumens. The lower the lumens, the longer the bulb lasts.

    3. Make sure you buy one for the appropriate use. Some projectors are designed for conference rooms, so they are designed to make an image that doesn't change, much, look good. Some projectors are designed for home theaters, so their video processors are designed for constantly changing images.

    4. Inputs, Inputs, Inputs! Get one that has Component video-in plugs(not goofy adapters), S-Video, VGA, and DVI(it's becoming the standard video output). Also, make sure it supports progressive scan and 16:9 aspect ratio(almost all do).

    5. Get the best screen you can afford(see #8). I recommend either Da-Lite or Stewart.

    6. Cover any/all windows/light sources. The more ambient light, the more washed out the picture.

    7. Once you have it, buy a color calibration CD. It's a lot cheaper than having a professional come in and calibrate it, and you get great results.

    8. Make sure your room is big enough. The first row of seating(e.g. couch) should be no closer than 1.6 times the diagonal measurement of the screen. Any closer and you see every pixel(commonly called the "screen door effect").

    Also, someone mentioned rear projection. Don't go that way. Rear projection screens are almost 10x more expensive, and, since they are glass, are known to "prism" the image(the image changes as you get to more extreme viewing angles...with the light actualy being like from a prism).

    1. Re:Some tips... by nostriluu · · Score: 1

      I think this is incorrect:

      2. Don't get too crazy with lumens. The people who do installs say most projectors need between 600 and 800 lumens. The lower the lumens, the longer the bulb lasts.

      I haven't seen any correlation between bulb life and lumen output. You do want to pay attention to contrast, though.

    2. Re:Some tips... by Malor · · Score: 1
      Carada, at www.carada.com, is a small outfit that makes very nice, inexpensive screens. They are robustly built, with 2" square hollow aluminum tubing covered in a very, very black fabric that absorbs light. The screen snaps onto the frame, and pulls perfectly smooth. It's a clever design that's fairly easy to disassemble for transit. I did struggle a bit on assembly: it just takes a screwdriver, but you need one that lets you apply a lot of torque. (read: big handle). I ended up using an electric. I cursed and swore a bit while building it, but now that it's done, I'm really, really happy with it.

      I paid about $600, plus shipping ($50??) for my 100" screen. The website offers many, many sizes, and I think you can get custom sizes done reasonably. They offer three materials: normal white, bright white (1.4 gain), and light gray (0.95 gain). The bright white and gray materials cost more. On the 100" screen, they'd have cost me about $50 extra. I just went for the straight white, as I will probably keep the screen through several projectors, and I didn't want to tune it too closely to my present LCD. (a Studio Experience 2HD, which is a rebadged Sanyo PLV-Z2... incredibly good $2K projector.)

      Most of the other screens I priced in that size range started at $1K and went up FAST. A Stewart Firehawk, which is specially designed for LCD-type projectors, would have cost me around $1700, plus shipping, and I'd have been forced to wait six weeks. (I got my Carada in two days!) Since the bloody projector ITSELF only cost about $2200, I just wasn't willing to spend that much on the screen.

      What I ended up with doesn't have fancy material, but it does a very nice job, is very well-built, and cost me far less than most other options I've seen. If you're looking for a reasonably-priced quality screen, Carada is worth checking out.

    3. Re:Some tips... by Analysis+Paralysis · · Score: 1
      Also, someone mentioned rear projection. Don't go that way. Rear projection screens are almost 10x more expensive, and, since they are glass, are known to "prism" the image(the image changes as you get to more extreme viewing angles...with the light actualy being like from a prism).
      Don't know where you are getting your prices from but the most expensive rear-projection sets should be in the US$4-6,000 region (probably a lot less). The viewing angle is limited in the vertical plane (i.e. you get best results when you are sitting in front of one rather than standing) but most offer a wide angle horizontally (you can be 50-60 degrees off-centre and still get a good image).

      Rear-projection is not affected by ambient light to the extent that front projection is - so if you cannot/do not keep your home cinema in permanent blackout then it should be worth considering (as long as you consider the reduced image size an appropriate compromise). Plasma may also be suitable but can suffer from noisy cooling fans and visible pixels when viewed up close.

      The choice ultimately is going to be whether you have a room dedicated to home-cinema viewing or not - if it has to be multi-purpose (family living room, etc) then any front projection setup is going to be sub-optimal. Some do get around this by having both a front projection (for films) and a CRT television (for news and general viewing).

  52. Don't listen to anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    else.....Runco projectors are the way to go....

    Being a high-end Audio/video technician, I think I'd know. Get a CRT projector with a rear-projection kit onto a 110 inch screen, and your good to go.

    -zuka

  53. I have a projector by Mithrandur · · Score: 4, Informative

    I like it. I'm projecting on a white wall (no screen yet) from about 10 feet with a Dell 3300MP. It's ceiling-mounted. The image is 83 inches (4:3, diagonal, wide-angle limit). The color reproduction (even without a screen) is beautiful, and the image is very clean. You will need a progressive scan DVD player with a component video output. Images that large suffer greatly from the poor signal quality of composite video (I tried that first, it was bad enough that I couldn't even fully focus the player because the signal was blurry - still watchable though). I haven't tried S-video yet.

    I paid $1750 to Dell for the projector. It's a DLP rated at 1200 lumens, and with a native resolution of 1024x768, which is enough to play widescreen DVDs at 576p (which is better than DVDs put out) without "compression".

    Be careful with eBay projectors. The lamps cost a pretty penny (Like 1/4 to 1/2 the cost of the projector), and the used ones may not have much lamp life left.

    Also: be sure that your lifestyle fits a projector. The room needs to be dark (with my setup at least). You can't watch a movie and do something with your hands, like my wife sometimes does, without a desk lamp, and that affects the projector's image quality.

    I imagine that a screen will help a lot, but I'm not there yet. I'll probably buy something inexpensive from Draper in the next few months.

    --
    vi is my shepard, I shall not font.
    1. Re:I have a projector by damiam · · Score: 1
      You can't watch a movie and do something with your hands, like my wife sometimes does, without a desk lamp

      The things I can imagine doing with one's hands during a movie don't require a desk lamp.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:I have a projector by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      You can't watch a movie and do something with your hands

      Well, with the kinds of movies I watch, what's the point?

  54. Check out projector central by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out projector central (http://www.projectorcentral.com/home.cfm) for reviews and reccomendations. I myself have an InFocus X1, which seems to be recommended by several folks around here. I'm really pleased with my X1, the !/$ ratio is off the charts IMHO, but it might not be for everyone-- it's vital to try before you buy.

    Proper light control is also essential with front projection, if you don't have an appropriate room, consider other display devices, such as rear projection, direct view CRT, LCD, Plasma, etc.

    If you have an appropriate room, front projection is the most film like, and is more like going to the movies than watching TV.

  55. things to consider by bigmo · · Score: 3, Informative

    You should be able to get a decent projector for $1500 - $3000 depending on what your tastes are. The most important thing is to actually look at lots of projectors in stores that are showing what you want to watch, whether it be broadcast sports, widescreen DVD movies, or computer games. Don't get a used one, save up for another few months and buy a new one. New bulbs cost $300-$600 and the brightness drops drastically after about half the bulbs rated life (the rated life varies a lot, but a bulb should last a couple years unless you never leave your house ...

    If you're only interested in regular video, not computer projection or HDTV, the resolution of the projector is a red herring. If not, get a 1024x768 res unit.

    Most people seem to think DLP style projectors have a better video image and LCD style projectors have a better computer image. LCD styles have a very high black level (a black image is dark gray on the screen) whereas DLP have a nice black. Again, this is more important for video than computer images. Just remember a good LCD projector is going to look better than a fair DLP projector no matter what, so use your eyes when shopping.

    Don't get anything with less than 1000 lumens brightness. Around 1500 is probably OK for up to a 5' wide screen if you don't keep the lights up too high. Much more than 2000 is probably wasted unless you have a very big screen or want to use it somewhere in addition to your living room.

    HDTV is hard to figure out. Many projectors say they handle it, but it's usually scan converted down inside the projector since 1080i is a bit over 1900 pixels wide and even 720p is 1280 pixels wide, so unless you have at least a 1280x1024 projector, the whole HDTV thing is a little bit of a sales con. If HD is important to you, you should look at the higher resolution units. As I said, look at it in the store. If it looks good to you, that's all that matters.

    Good luck, I wish I could afford one ...

    1. Re:things to consider by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      Don't get anything with less than 1000 lumens brightness. Around 1500 is probably OK for up to a 5' wide screen if you don't keep the lights up too high. Much more than 2000 is probably wasted unless you have a very big screen or want to use it somewhere in addition to your living room.

      This is not entirely true. For a dedicated home theater room where the light level can be controlled you will end up calibrating the projector aperture to output around 500 lumens or less for maximum contrast. Your advice on lumens though is probably correct for a family room with windows and drapes. The Sharp Z2 and Panasonic AE500/L500 get great reviews but are onyl rated at about 800 lumens, you just shoudl not try to use them somewhere where you cannot control the light sufficiently.

  56. I bought a SHARP PG-A10x by oscarm · · Score: 2, Informative

    After a lot of research. I came to the conclusion that a projector makes sense if you want a huge image but don't have the room for a massive TV.
    This is what I was looking for when I started shopping:
    1) multiple inputs ( s-video, rca video, vga ) I did component input via a component to vga cable (bought 75' online whereas the official sharp cable was $50 for 15' of cable.
    2) Small ( not enough room in our family room for a big LCD TV, plus the room is on the 2nd floor. )
    3) Support for HDTV resolutions ( i just use 480p for DVD movies now )
    4) under $1500 - i didn't want to spend more because of the cost of bulbs. Still, factoring in that I'll replace the bulb in a couple of years I've still spent less than a decent LCD tv. Also, I had to budget for buying a home theatre receiver and speakers.

    We don't use the projector for everyday tv watching, but its AWESOME to throw up a huge image across the wall for movies and video games (mario kart & rogue squadron ).

    Product Info ( i don't work for sharp, own their stock, I just bought the projector):
    http://www.sharpusa.com/products/Mode lLanding/0,10 58,1055,00.html

    1. Re:I bought a SHARP PG-A10x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in the AV business - I'm actually evaluating the Sharp A-10xu right now. I'd say on the scale of projectors I test, write software for and support this is the BARE MINUMUM you'd want in a projector. This is very similar to the Espon Powerlite S1. Mitsubishi makes some small cheap ones, so do Luxeon. BenQ basically OEM's everything so you might as well buy from the original unless BenQ has some great deal.

      good luck.

      Oh... hint for you 4:3 vs 16:9 folks:
      determine which you would use more of. Then you can use a curtain like the movie theatres use to close in on the picture/image and it will look a lot classier, and well thought out.

  57. Insurance Chasing by decipher_saint · · Score: 3, Informative

    If a bar in your area gets shut down see if they have an auction or find out what liquidation place they use to sell off the old equipment. I know more than one guy who's gotten a good (but old) projector (that's not the expensive part) and a half-decent screen (that can be the expensive part).

    Of course, you have to keep your ear to the ground...

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Insurance Chasing by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      If a bar in your area gets shut down see if they have an auction or find out what liquidation place they use to sell off the old equipment.

      Bad idea. Monumentally bad idea.

      Used equipment is a good idea, but anything that has been mounted on the ceiling of a smoky, greasy bar will have it's useful life significantly shortened. Digital projectors have to move a lot of air through them, and Marlboro and fry grease flavored air is harsh on electronics and optics.

      I know this well, as I install and maintain video projectors in bars. When these places are done with something, the only correct place for it to go is a dumpster. The screens have it even worse than the projectors!

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    2. Re:Insurance Chasing by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but you won't find a projector and/or screen for cheaper anywhere else though.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    3. Re:Insurance Chasing by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      Fair enough, but you won't find a projector and/or screen for cheaper anywhere else though.

      You could try the places where I have bought every projector I've ever owned - rental houses. I purchased a HD Sony industrial CRT projector for $1000 that originally cost $28,000. It had only 600 hours on the unit. They dumped it so cheap because they had moved entirely over to LCD and DLP units, and no suit wanted to rent a big, heavy (165 lbs!) CRT. The longer a unit sits on the shelf, not renting, the more it costs them on their taxes. It's worth it for them to dump it.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  58. SPELLING NAZI by op00to · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Discreet. The word you wanted is discreet. There is a difference.

    1. Re:SPELLING NAZI by Dun+Malg · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Discreet. The word you wanted is discreet. There is a difference.

      Heh. Maybe he meant that the projector had absolutely no tendency to intermingle its parts with other objects in the room.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:SPELLING NAZI by bcboy · · Score: 1

      ;)

      thanks

    3. Re:SPELLING NAZI by op00to · · Score: 1

      No problem. What else can I do during work besides correct people's spelling?

  59. My home theater recommendation by lazyowl · · Score: 1

    I took the home theater plunge about a year ago. And AVSforums is the place for all your questions. Spend many hours on their boards and it will save you problems down the line. As for projector, I picked up a used CRT projector with 8" lenses off of ebay. I paid $579 for it. The picture quality on CRT's can't be touched by DLPs and LCDs. All the serious videophile's aggree on that. THe only reason I can see for going with a DLP or LCD would be if you cannot keep your theater dark enough. It's a very fun hobby. And with my Athlon XP2600+ powering it, I can watch hdtv material that I download off of alt.binaries.hdtv too! Even better quality than DVD's. The picture I get from my el-cheapo home theater is as good as film in the theater. And I can get true blacks with no screen door effect, unlike the LCD and DLP projectors. I did it on the cheap and you can too with a bit of research.

  60. I second that motion by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

    yep, those "homebrews" are pretty hurting... very very faint, because they generally use the existing light from your monitor, blow it up using a Fresnel lens, and project it on the wall. Not only does that cut down on the light so dramatically that you'll have to seal your windows and doorframes with black tape, but the Fresnel lens (because it's just a sheet of plastic) doesn't give you the best picture... you get thousands of concentric circles, just like on an old overhead projector.

    --
    Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
    1. Re:I second that motion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like those kits you could buy out of the back of popular mechanics years ago.

    2. Re:I second that motion by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Unless something has changed (in the laws of physics), you also have to turn the monitor/TV upside down to use a fresnel lens. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:I second that motion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chairs go on the ceiling.

    4. Re:I second that motion by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

      beautiful, man. If only I had mod points. I haven't laughed that hard all day.

      --
      Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
  61. I did this in my bedroom... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proxima DP6850 (about eBay$ 1300 for 1500 lumens, nice picture, etc) on a shelf i built above the headboard of the bed, projects 78" image onto the opposite wall a few feet past the foot of the bed. After I sanded the screen (white sheetrock wall) down a bit, I was pretty happy with the image quality, which itself I suspect to be typical of projectors in this price range.

    I love laying back on a custom-manufactured king-sized bed, and watching 78-inch movies with Dolby Digital sound though. And some people settle for movie seats.

  62. CRT Projectors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally have gotten 5 older CRT projectors from various locations that have upgraded to LCD. With a little work I was able to cobble together 2 perfectly good projectors. They work great for movies, just don't expect to be able to read size 12 fonts on them. Newer CRT projectors can handle it, but for free its a awesome deal.

  63. Multiple monitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This can look awesome if you do it right. Of course you have to get used to the spaces between the screens and the power consumption sucks. But hey, you can experiment with this for almost nothing. Buy monitors used and if you don't like the results you can sell them for just about what you payed for them.

    http://freedesktop.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gstre am er/www.old/htdocs/docs/video-wall-howto.html?rev=1 .5

  64. On the subject of light... by Tree131 · · Score: 1
    Whenever I take my color lcd phone out in bright sunlight, the result is a dark screen, not a brighter one

    you can't compare the LCD screen on the phone and a projector.

    Phone: light passes through LCD and hits your retina

    Projector: light passes through LCD, reflects from screen/wall, and hits your retina.

    My 2c

    1. Re:On the subject of light... by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Projectors are pretty bright... what I'm saying is that my phone, when lit the same way they are trying light their panel in the illustration, is pretty dark and I don't think it'll be nearly bright enough to project on the wall with any visibility.

  65. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A man never stands to tall as when he stoops to trollbaiting..."

    "A man never stands TOO tall as when he stoops to trollbaiting..." GET A BRAIN! MORAN!

  66. I'd go for a Panasonic PT-L500U or Sanyo PLV-Z2 by abischof · · Score: 1

    I would go for either the Panasonic PT-L500U or the Sanyo PLV-Z2. Both use the same Epson LCD, so they're fairly similar. They run at at 1280x720, which gives you HD resolution (full 720p widescreen or resized 1080i).

    And, they both include DVI HDCP which means that you can have a full end-to-end digital connection from your DVD player to your projector (just make sure you get a DVD player that suports DVI (such as the Bravo D1).

    They have differing list prices but both sell for around $2000 each (plus you'll need to buy a screen as well). And before you buy one, I'd recommend checking out HomeTheaterForum.com and AVSForum.com (not linked to prevent Slashdotting). Both of those forums are great resources and anyone there will be happy to answer your questions.

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

  67. Re:I have a projector (screen types) by kyoorius · · Score: 1

    I have read, on avsforum, about people who are using a specific sheet plastic (bathroom shower) material bought from the Home Depot for HT screens. They rave about how much better it is than commercial Draper or Dalite screens.

    You might want to try that before dropping some dough on a commercial roll-up screen that is either too reflective/not enough or rolls down unevenly.

    I went the homebrew route with my motorized drop-down screen ( http://techfreakz.org/~rolan/ht ) because it had to be wife-friendly.

    If I could leave the screen down all the time, or find a way to hide when not in use, I'd probably go with the plastic shower material.

    At $20 for a 4x8 sheet, it's worth a try.

  68. Don't forget the screen by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

    Projecting onto the bare wall or (heaven forbid) a white sheet will kill you---and the picture. Get yourself a nice Da-Lite screen. The size of the room (i.e., the distance from the screen and your projector will determine the max size of your screen). In my 12x12 room with a ceiling mounted projector, I maxed out at 109". Nothing like having a larger-than-life superbowl, especially the 1/2-time show (tee hee).

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Don't forget the screen by nerdb0t · · Score: 0

      fyi - bare wall looks awesome. i use a HE3100 by Plus for an 8' wide screen, and it looks great.

      Da-Lite is neat and all, but in my opinion, it really doesn't make all that much of a difference.

      $.02

    2. Re:Don't forget the screen by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      No one has mentioned this so I will... On avsforum many people have had success with pulling black out cloth over a wood frame in order to create a fixed screen at a much lower cost than Da-Lite.

  69. Older projectors by Revvy · · Score: 1

    I've got a Sony VPH 1270, something you can still find on eBay for under $1000. Yeah, it's big, but no LCD is ever going to compare to a 3-gun CRT. Add a line doubler and hang the projector from the ceiling, pointed at a nice screen, and you've got a beautiful view of any video game, movie, or computer screen you dare to hook up to it. Lifespan of the guns is 10,000 hours if they're taken care of. Line doublers are less than $500 and a good screen should be less than $300. Ceiling mounts are usually about $200. So, for less than $2000 you can have a complete setup. Hell, I'll sell you mine for $1500.

  70. Obligatory penny-arcade ripoff by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    "This $30,000 projector has better picture quality than yours."

    "Oh yeah? My picture is awesome, since it's framed by $28,000 dollars in cash."

    --
    It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    1. Re:Obligatory penny-arcade ripoff by gooberguy · · Score: 1

      Wow, $28,500 would buy like 10GB of cache.

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    2. Re:Obligatory penny-arcade ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit? I mean, the Grandparent even wrote 'Obligatory penny-arcade ripoff' in the title.... look, there it is in the title of your post too.


      Rolls eyes.

      Nick, posting anon because I've moderated.

  71. Yep, by far, the X1 is the best entry level by laddhebert · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I agree. By far the Infocus X1 and all of the relabled versions are the best sub $1000 projectors out there.

    What a lot of people don't realize is that it is also better than a lot of the more expensive projectors out there also. It has great contrast and the colors look superb. What this long throw projector lacks in some people's eyes is its resolution: 800x600 . But guess what, unless you're watching HD signals (720p/1080i/p) , you won't notice a thing. Sure you might not get a great picture when you hook your PC up to it, but the reader asked for a home theater projector and the last I checked there were just a few HD DVD players, and even fewer movies that supported HD quality resolutions.

    Also, it will take the higher resolution signals (which only work through its vga port - grab the component break out cable from the Infocus website) and scale them the approriate resolution. The projector has a built in Faroudja deinterlacer (see http://www.dcdi-video.com/technology/articles/sage -dcdi-overview.html for more explanation) also, which happens to be one of the best DCDi chips out there.

    The best place to get started with an X1 is to check out the very, very informative X1 FAQ by technet at http://members.shaw.ca/technut/x1faq/

    Based on research, I was able to build my own home theater using the X1 for cheaper than the big screen rear projector TV I bought and returned because of a crummy picture and scratch on the screen. For around 2k I built the home theater which included: the X1, the sound system (onkyo) , the dvd player, the paint for the walls, and the material to build the screen. Send me a private message for pics.

    -L

    --
    Don't Panic.
    1. Re:Yep, by far, the X1 is the best entry level by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      The main reason people dislike 800x600 is because it is lower than the native resolution of a DVD.

      DVDs are 720x576 (PAL DVDs at least) and if you have a 16:9 title (most of them), the picture will be enlarged to 800 in width and black bars will be created to reform the original aspect ration. Hence the DVD will be squeezed in 450 pixels height. That's even less than an NTSC title!

    2. Re:Yep, by far, the X1 is the best entry level by laddhebert · · Score: 1
      That is true, but, a lot of movies are shot in 1.85:1. In most cases, the X1 does not squeeze anything, it crops. A lot of what gets cropped too is the black bars, which aren't being used anyway. Directly from technut's X1 faq:

      So if I figure correctly, a native 1.85 image would be 848x459 active. Not losing much there on top and bottom. we will be seeing 800x450 of those. 1.85:1 cropped to 1.78:1 a native 2:35 image would be 848x361 active. Loose nothing there. we will see 800x361. 2.35:1 cropped to 2.22:1.

      The X1 in 16:9 mode will crop a dvd from 848 x 480 pixels to 800 x 450 pixels. But, it delivers very good pq quality because it is doing 1 to 1 pixel mapping, so there are no scaling errors or artifacts.

      For a 1:78 movie, it will crop 30 pixels from the vertical picture, and 48 pixels from the horizontal picture, or about 3% on all sides.

      For 2:35 to 1 and 1:85 to 1, it will do the same cropping, but because these movies are "shorter" vertically, the X1 is actually only cropping the black bars above and below. It will still crop the 48 pixels (24 from each side) from the horizontal picture. All in all, it's barely noticeable.

      Usually the purists can't stand any kind of cropping or scaling. I came from a 5 year old 27 inch TV set , so this is pure heaven for me ;) I watch all satellite and TV broadcasts in 4:3 mode, and all DVDs (well, most of them unless they are not widescreen) in 16:9 mode. 16:9 mode on the X1 isn't native, but that doesn't seem to matter much.

      -L

      --
      Don't Panic.
    3. Re:Yep, by far, the X1 is the best entry level by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe you should re-read my post. While it is pretty close for NTSC titles, it is a hell of a lot worse with PAL titles, which doesn't have a 480 px height but a 576px height. If the X1 crops your picture, you end up seeing 50% of your movie. I certainly hope that's not the case...

    4. Re:Yep, by far, the X1 is the best entry level by laddhebert · · Score: 1
      Woops, my apologies. The keyword here was PAL. The X1 doesn't crop PAL (it would be around a 22% loss vertically if it did), it scales it to 800x450. You'll get better quality from an NTSC source, than a PAL. Sucks for PAL users. I'm in the US, the only thing PAL for me is a handful of XBOX games, and that's about it.

      -Ladd

      --
      Don't Panic.
  72. get the the first HDTV projector - Sony Qualia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony introduces the ultimate home theater projector for the A/V specialty and custom installation market with 1920 x 1080 resolution.

    http://www.projectorcentral.com/part_opinions.cf m? part_id=2266

  73. Some Warnings About DLP by BRock97 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Some things to know about DLP:
    • Bulb life is always and issue. Most are rated up to around 8000 hours (if you watched six hours a day, it would wash out to about 3.5 years). When you need to replace that bulb, it will set you back another $400-$500.
    • They don't offer true HD resolutions. 1386 x 788 is about as high as they go which will resolve 720p just fine. But, that means 1080i would need to be down converted to fit the screen, a process that I have personally seen introduce jaggies to an otherwise beautiful picture.
    • The dreaded screen door effect. If you blow up your DLP projector too big, you will see what is called the screen door effect where you can make out each pixel of the DLP chip. Not too pretty. Go to your local AV shop and get real close to the screen to actually see them. If you are not careful, you can make those big enough to be seen from all over the room.
    My beef is the lack of true 1080i support. Supposedly, the LCOS chips coming will be able to support 1080i, but I haven't actually seen these projectors yet.

    As someone mentioned above, you need to determine the needs of the projector and if true HD resolution is one of them, hold off for now.
    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    1. Re:Some Warnings About DLP by Dastardly · · Score: 1

      My beef is the lack of true 1080i support. Supposedly, the LCOS chips coming will be able to support 1080i, but I haven't actually seen these projectors yet.

      Actually it is not likely you will ever see any DLP, LCD, LCOS, or Plasma display have true 1080i support as they are inherently progressive scan (as currently designed). Best case 1080p which is easier to convert to than 720p. And, that still screws things up because 720p is considered true HDTV, and is broadcast by ABC. Therefore, no non CRT TV will be able to display all HDTV resolutions natively until 3840x2160 displays come along.

    2. Re:Some Warnings About DLP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony should be able to pull off 3840x2160 using the Laser GLV technology. (They claim the GLVs have enough bandwidth to scan at least a 4K wide picture.) Commercially available projectors based on this technology seem to be held up by the need for a high output blue laser diode. (The red and green laser diodes are already available.)

    3. Re:Some Warnings About DLP by ottawanker · · Score: 1

      The new Sony Qualia 004 does 1080p and 1080i support and apparantly a native resolution of 1920x1080 Pixels. It is going to cost $25-30k though.

  74. Try older models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A number of older models (up to 800x600 res) can
    be found on ebay for ~200. If you pick the right
    ones they use very cheap ($6) FXL bulbs (same as
    used in overhead projectors). These typically
    last 30-50 hours. If you find you want to spend
    more and get highly quality, these projectors
    will always be easy to sell on due to the very low
    bulb replacement burden.

  75. The Guys to Call. by tallen702 · · Score: 1

    http://www.audioadvice.com They have everything you need to know about home-theater and will work with you to fit your budget no matter how large or small it is.

  76. need to check out this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This site has some really nice plans and a really good support community. http://www.lumenlab.com

  77. Answers: by JMZero · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd love to hear an example of a projector with replacement bulbs that cost less than $200

    The lamp for my Epson S1 (which cost $900) is $199 at FocusedTechnology. This lamp is rated for 2000 hours, but reports I've heard suggest this is conservative - and that the bulb will last longer if well ventilated. I wouldn't buy a Dell, although I haven't looked a bunch at their offerings.

    So, explain why I can't use a cheaper light source that is just as bright if I don't need it necessarily to fit into a itty bitty plastic case?

    It's not just about brightness, it's about even-ness, temperature, and - as you suggest - size. Some projectors do use halogen bulbs, but they typically have very short lifetimes (~100 hours, I think). Most consumer projectors use metal halide bulbs.

    With correct ventilation, and with no size restriction, you may well be able to use a different kind of lamp. Again, I think what you'll be unable to find is a lamp that can light evenly enough to create a quality picture.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    1. Re:Answers: by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

      Er, S1...that's the one I meant. I looked at that when I was shopping for a sub-$1000 projector to test the feasibility of this project, but the bulbs at the store were closer to $300. I probably should have froogled them, but since they all seemed close to the same price, I figured it was normal.

      Does anyone know who makes the bulbs/projectors for Dell? I'm trying to froogle the bulbs but I'm not having much luck with Dell's part number.

      If these bulb really lasts longer than 2000 hours...well great but I wish consumer reports or someone would actually do a conclusive test and not just rely on ancedote or vague impressions.

      And if the halogens have shorter lifetimes, that would explain why a lot of projectors were giving three digit bulb life projections.

      - JoeShmoe
      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  78. Re:..pssssst by djdanlib · · Score: 1

    Yeah. It works great for $10, no kidding. Key word is works. You get what you pay for, and not a bit more or less. I made the housing for the lens with about $5 of black foam board and some black duct tape I already had.

    I looked up the cost of a comparable Fresnel lens and it was the same price either way. The two ways being thus... Buying the plans and lens from Ebay, or buying the lens without a plan from an online lens shop. Go with the plans. You'll get a cheapo lens that you may or may not be happy with but you're getting it for about the right price.

    You can get a high quality rigid lens for about thirty bucks and make a better projector or upgrade the one you already built, but you really need a good SOURCE before you upgrade the lens. A bubble-shaped fourteen inch monitor from ten years ago is not a good source. You need a truly flat screen or you'll only be able to get one part of the screen in focus at a time. It'll make you crazy. That's just simple optical physics, though. My Diamondtron works just fine as a source, and LCD monitors are great.

    Also, a bright video source is pretty much required because the light projected onto a point decreases exponentially with increasing distance. More simple physics there. So you're going to need a bright screen, bright target screen for projection, and a dark room. Let's face it. Your CRT just can't compete with a projector bulb in terms of brightness. You can't make a fresnel based projector that works well in a well lit room.

    In case you were wondering: The lens you get is a flimsy letter paper sized plastic sheet, but it's most definitely a lense. You can use it for a large rectangular magnifying glass. In fact I think Staples has a lighted reading magnifier that uses one of these.

    I don't sell stuff on Ebay or otherwise, nor am I promoting these kits. I just want to provide some info for anyone who's considering purchasing one of these, so you can make an educated choice about whether it is the right thing for you to do.

    The moral of this post is to make sure what you've already got will be adequate before you buy a DIY kit.

  79. For the DIYer, check out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    DIY Audio

    I found a $300 1024x768 panel on ebay and coupled it with a bright overhead projector I got for $100 on ebay. Sure it's no DLP, but I can watch movies on a 120" diagonal now. It's fun to measure your screen in feet rather than inches. Also, I can now call my 40" widescreen my "small tv."

  80. LOLOMG! YUO BEN METATROLED&!@*[NO CARIAR] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  81. Bulb life shouldn't be a problem for most people by slobber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love how everyone seems to be bitchin' and moanin' about projector's limited bulb life. I was worried about it too when I was choosing my projector but then did some math and calmed down.

    The bulb life on my Sony VPL-HS20 is 3000 hours in "cinema mode". I figure that with my schedule I won't be able to watch more than 1 hour per day (aside from an occasional LOR marathon). So that gives me a whooping 3,000 days before bulb goes caput. That's over 8 friggin' years! I figure that in eight years technology will advance so far that instead of spending $$$ on a new bulb I'll get a new projector or whatever the imaging device de la creme will be. (300dpi wall-to-wall imaging nanopaper, anyone?)

    As for people saying that projectors are expesnive, I have to disagree. I get an eyepopping 120" diag. image for under $3K. Even if plasma screen of this size existed, it would probably cost over $100K. Of course, a nice Home Theater PC that is hooked up to the projector through DVI and an excellent 120" sceeen from Carada.com cost me an extra 1.5K, it is still a bargain. The only drawback is that the room has to be relatively dark, but this is not a problem in my case because it is in the basement.

    --
    "You mortals are so obtuse." -Q
  82. Not gonna bother with reading the comments by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

    but I had a 5.6" LCD, and the backlight went out on me. The panel itself was fine, but the light wouldn't turn on, so I disassembled the device and laid the panel on a over head projector I bought for $30 on eBay, and each lamp cost about $15 (two lamp set up, you flip a lever and it slides the spare lamp over in case of a burn out). The LCD has a 12V power source, which I hooked up to a SFF computer I bought, and the other inputs are audio/video RCA. Obviously the speaker on the thing is shit, so I leave the audio open. I got a VGA to NTSC converter from eBay for $14. You can probably make your own, the circuit looks simple enough. I don't have any capability to make circuit boards though, so $14 sounded good to me. Run the computer into the LCD and presto.

    The projector is about 2400 lumens. In PITCH DARK it works great. Any ambient light and forget it. You'll need more like 4000 lumens if you can't eliminate all the light. Obviously you have to fashion some sort of light blocker for the rest of the projector or the light will over come the image. Being cheap and poor, I used a piece of foam board and cut out a rectangle to match the LCD screen. It works pretty well, but foam board is a mother fucker to cut straight. Next iteration of this I'm gonna use fiberglass.

    My parents also had a slide projector screen. I "borrowed" that and it works a thousand times better than a sheet or a blank wall. The material is the best for reflecting the image. I highly recommend getting an actual projection screen.

    As a full fleged EE, this will prove to be simple unless you have trouble fabricating your own things. Good luck. You can easily do this for under $200 if you shop around.

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  83. Old CRT Projectors - a great deal by WNight · · Score: 1

    If you're a tinkerer at all, consider buying an old CRT projector. They aren't as bright (not that you need all the lumens the business projectors throw) and you need to focus the three guns seperately, but once you do you get a very nice picture without the flaws of the current generation.

    I see rainbows in DLP projectors, as do most people I know, though some don't seem bothered by it. LCDs aren't offensive, but the screen-door look isn't very impressive. CRTs don't have either problem.

    This is the route I went. A friend of mine bought me an Electrohome ECP-4101 projector off of EBay for USD 1200 after reconditioning. (Funny how the price has fallen, this one was $50k USD in the mid-90s when new.)

    It's 30kg and big, but cheaper than the decent modern projectors and without the artifacts I mentioned.

    It'll do 1280x1024 and movies look great when played by the computer, much better than out of even high-end DVD players. Easily accomplished with a wireless keyboard and mouse. It's also a great screen for games, or computing when sick.

    They have a ten thousand hour lifespan, but if you leave them on a static screen they can suffer burn-in a bit (like old monitors).

    I just didn't think the current generation of LCD or DLP projectors were ready. They're small, but expensive and not that great of quality. In five or ten years I'm sure I'll get one, but I didn't want to be on the bleeding edge.

  84. ... obnoxious by maggard · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    snotty reply snipped

    The fella asks a perfectly legitimate question: What about projection displays in 24/7 environments like network centers? He then points out that perfection isn't required for this, it's a "good-enough" non-videophile situation.

    You then get all supercilious about his even having the temerity to ask such a question, and downright rude about folks who might watch lots of TV. You cap it off with an obvious comment on bulb quality, again, after the poster pointed out quality wasn't an issue and a bit of accommodation was acceptable (rear-projecting onto a 30 inch screen doesn't require a bright bulb anyway.)

    Way to drive down the quality of real signal to noise here, Bub. Can't thank you enough for working out your social insecurities on a legitimate poster asking a useful and /.-audience relevant question. Hope you feel all big and proud of yourself now for cutting him down to (your) size.

    Finally, on a personal note, while it may be unheard of in your snide little world there are folks who do watch lots of TV: My Mom is one. She's retired and has fought bouts of depression for 50 years. Yes, there are days she's doing well to get out of bed to watch the big TV thankyouverymuch.

    Frankly the one who needs surgery is you: Attitude and social skill upgrade, stat.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  85. A family example by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 5, Informative

    My uncle is a movie-techno-geek from a long way back, and recently set up just such a system. He found two things that needed adjusting.

    The first was that these projectors are designed for computer presentations in large rooms, so the light was ridiculously bright for DVDs and such in a home theater. Solution: a neutral density filter between the optics and the screen.

    The second was that the colour temperature was much too high (too blue). Solution: a warming filter. It's a very pale rose pink colour. People don't look like aliens anymore.

    The results are striking. I'm tempted myself.

    ...laura

  86. Obligatory HOTWPO Tie-In by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    The word you wanted is discreet.
    "Announcing the Cretins from Sparta!"

    -whisper, whisper-

    "Make that, the Spartans from Crete!"

    --
    Yeah, right.
  87. save up and spend the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't go with a projector if you don't have the budget. A sub $1k projector is just plain painful if you ever do see a $5k+ one in action.

    My primary TV is a 60" Plasma, and I am adding a Vidikron Projector ($10k) with a drop down 10' screen . I have used cheap projectors, and after the novelty wears off, I hated watching anything on it.

  88. The facts in a few paragraphs by telemonster · · Score: 3, Informative

    First off, I own a Sony VPH-1278Q. Paid $1350 for it from eBay seller BPAI in Maryland, went and picked it up in person.

    LCD and DLP projectors are compact, lightweight, and portable. Bright images from a small unit. Bulb costs are high, and the color intensity changes with the bulb life. Fixed resolution for the panels, there are widescreen units availible. Screen cannot do true black, there is always illumination even when the screen is "black"

    CRT projectors are bulky, a pain in the ass to setup (you have to converge all 3 guns together). The 1278Q can do 1280x1024 I believe, but I run it from a HTPC @ 1024x768. Mine generates some noise, I could take efforts to silence it but it doesn't bother me.

    CRT life can hit 8000 hours, the blue is the first to go. Static images burn in on CRT projectors, DLP/LCD don't suffer from this issue. CRT can do true black, all power to guns is cut and the screen is dark. CRT's are also known to have a hotness in the color when there is just a tiny bit, that is if there is just a little bit of red then it will be over-emphasised a bit because it takes a certain amount of power to fire the CRT (I haven't noticed this, this is from what I've read).

    The CRT projector prices are falling, BUT ****BEWARE**** because many of the units on the surplus market are from corporate use, where they have been abused. Windows NT login splash burned into the display, etc. Be careful about this!!! There are hour counters on CRT projectors, mine had about 2200 hours on it when I bought it. I noticed some 4:3 browning but it didn't have any effect as it was outside of my projection area.

    There is a bit more info on my web page above.

    People balk at the size of my projector and start to talk about something they saw at SAMS club for xyz. There is much more to it than just point and shoot.

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  89. I have an Infocus X1.... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    I love it. It's by far the coolest thing I've ever used for watching DivX's. I don't have a lot of experience to compare it with though. I like it a lot more than the projecor we use at work for Powerpoint stuff.

    Unfortunately, with the X1 I am having a problem with visible noise on the S-Video input. I see gray lines that track from the bottom of the screen to the top. This is almost certainly a power problem and may be solved by getting a better S-Video cable or moving the projector power plug to a different circuit.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:I have an Infocus X1.... by S.Lemmon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, you probably have a ground loop causing interference. It can happen anytime you connect two devices where the grounding isn't 100% equal. The problem is some small current flows between them causing noise from the 50/60hz AC power cycle.

      Solutions include making sure both devices are plugged into the same line, using a shorter cable to connect them, or if nothing else works, using a ground loop isolation transformer.

  90. Re:Get an entry-level projector. / Forget homebrew by Ogerman · · Score: 1

    Like a Epson Powerlite S1 or an Infocus X1. The picture will be infinitely better than what you'd get from a homebrew. Don't even consider the homebrew thing. Really. I've seen a few (based on CRT's or overhead projectors and LCD panels) and they are really poor.

    I second this opinion. The homebrew thing is not worthwhile today given the cost of the latest round of commercial projectors. Two years ago, when I started tinkering, it was feasible to attempt. Low-end projectors then cost 50% more for significantly worse performance. Today, you will have to spend $600-700 to almost match the performance of a $800-900 entry-level commercial DLP projector like the X1 or S1 mentioned. Don't be fooled by sites that claim it only costs $300-400. That is only for the specialized bulb/ballast, lenses, and cabinetry required. You're looking at another $250+ for a halfway decent LCD screen that you can remove the backlight from and project through. Those old projection panels you can find on eBay are crap. (Proxima, iView, etc.)

    Trust me. I'm a hard core DIYer and I've tried the homebrew LCD projector thing. It's not that it doesn't work at all, but this is a case of inadequate technology available to the home experimenter to match commercial products. It's simply not worth your time and efforts. If you want a good project, build a "Sonotube" subwoofer. That will save you lots of money *and* give you outstanding results. Once you get a projector, you can make your own custom screen that fits nicely with your HT room. That's another worthwhile money-saver.

  91. be extremely careful about lighting by johne417 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A note to the author or anyone else considering a front projector for home theater: be very very wary of lighting conditions. If you have, say, a dedicated home theater in a basement room with no windows, or any other type of situation where you can completely control your environment, front projectors may very well be the best option (man, that adjustable screen is cool!). But any sort of ambient light at all is going to make you extremely unhappy with the picture. Home theater projectors are far different from computer-based video projectors in this sense. DLP is as bright as front projectors come, and it's still not good at all in a room with ambient light. And I'm not just a videophile being picky. Go to an Ultimate Electronics or if you're lucky enough to have a Magnolia around, go there, and demo one out, asking the sales rep for a small amount of light in the room. Decide for yourself. These things aren't for living rooms, or any room with a window, or somewhere where the next room over will frequently have a light on, etc... But that being said, in a completely controlled environment, front projectors rock. And the engineer in original post should build his own, to satisfy his own curiosity and because that's just damn cool.

    1. Re:be extremely careful about lighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just staple bed sheets over your windows like i did to my room.. Although I dont have a projector, i just hate sunlight.. man if it wasn't for my PC/router/modem/printer LEDs, my room would be PITCH BLACK whenever i turn off my monitor

    2. Re:be extremely careful about lighting by Analysis+Paralysis · · Score: 1
      i just hate sunlight.. man if it wasn't for my PC/router/modem/printer LEDs, my room would be PITCH BLACK
      Yes, isn't it just dreadful the way the sun makes your skin burn and fangs ache...
  92. Bulbs by Deanasc · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that the bulb life on the average "PowerPoint Projector" is around 2000 hours. The cheapest retail projector ($1000) range could take a new bulb that cost in the neighborhood of $250. So figuring only one 2 hour movie a night you won't even get a year out of one bulb. Figure you'll end up spending around $1000 on a projector and in 3 years a $1000 in bulbs. In the long run, you're better off spending the $2 grand that a good large screen TV will cost.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  93. Screen door?? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I thought you could only get the "screen door" effect with an LCD - where you could see lines in-between the pixels (thus the term "screen door"). I think the effect you mention is just the case of having only so many pixels, but is not "screen door".

    The bulb cost is not that much anymore - I think the X1 is now rated for 3000-4000 hours of bulb life, and if you look at the infocus store the bulbs are only $250 or so!

    I agree about the HD resolution, I would like real 1080i... though I have to say that 1080i even downsampled still looks really really good on the X1! And DVD's I think look at good as they can on anything that supports 720p or lower. Basically I'll probably wait for my X1 to die before I get some kind of next-get DLP projector that supports true 1080i (that or if too many thing need DHCP support, which the X1 does not have).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Screen door?? by BRock97 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought you could only get the "screen door" effect with an LCD - where you could see lines in-between the pixels (thus the term "screen door"). I think the effect you mention is just the case of having only so many pixels, but is not "screen door".

      Actually, it will affect both. Since both systems are pixel based, you can see the little squares that make up the image. DLP is less affected by it, as seen at this link.

      --

      Bryan R.
      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
  94. BENQ PB6100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people over at projector central seem to love this projector. I'm going to be buying one myself. Check it out.

  95. Worth Checking Out by value_added · · Score: 1

    Doesn't address your questions directly, but I stumbled across a site some time ago that shows in detail the building of a home studio. You can find the picture gallery here.

  96. Color Calibration CD? by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Once you have it, buy a color calibration CD

    How exactly does that work? :-)

    1. Re:Color Calibration CD? by iantri · · Score: 1
      I assume he meant DVD. They have a series of tests on them that help you calibrate your TV. I assume there is a matching card to get the colour right.

      Some video stores rent them, actually.

  97. Electrical Engineer BUILD something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you serious? The only thing I've ever seen an engineer build right was a ham sandwitch.

  98. Build your own DIY LCD Projector by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    DIY Projector

    Articles and a store for you to build one for about $200-$300.

    Unlike the link given in the original article this one isn't a slashdotted geocities page with a weak google cache link.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  99. Wrong on cost... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    From what I can see, X1 bulbs are really more like $350. So I was a bit off on cost there.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  100. Things I've seen, things I've done... by cr0sh · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A friend of mine has set up in his "living room" an old Infocus LP720. Running under optimal conditions, the thing throws a very nice picture, but its resolution isn't the best. For regular television and the occasional game, though - it is pretty nice. The big beef with it, though, is the bulb costs. Life on the bulbs has been pretty good (according to him he doesn't really change the bulb much), but the bulbs themselves run about $300 (or so he says). He would probably have a better picture if he used a real screen - right now, he projects on a wall he painted with "pearlescent" white paint (to simulate a beaded screen, I guess?) - its better than a plain white wall, but not as good as a screen (plus the wall looks wrong when viewed regularly - but that isn't a problem for him).

    Myself, I picked up Fujix P401 Mini Projector a long while back. I had to get it fixed, but it works great now. No bigger than a couple of stacked VHS tapes. Unfortunately, the bulbs are very hard to obtain (6 volt), and the resolution is very poor (320 x 200 or something). But it looks OK if you keep the screen size down (below 50" diagonal), and games play OK on it. I found that a shower curtain works OK for a screen, if you can get all of the wrinkles out. But what works fabulous for a screen, comes in a variety of sizes, rolls up, and is very cheap - is a blackout blind! I bought mine from Home Depot, I think I spent $15.00 or so on it. I think it was 60 inches wide or so. Mounted it to the ceiling, and it can pull down, lock, then pull and retract away. Very smooth surface, white and reflective. Not as good as a Da Lite, but much cheaper!

    For a screen, look into getting a Da Lite. One thing to do is go to garage sales (tag sales), and see if you can find a foldable slide projector screen. If you can get a good silver one, with little or no damage (an old Da Lite, for instance) - don't pay more than $20.00 (I have seen them for much, much less) - and you will have a great screen.

    As far as homebrew projectors are concerned: ask yourself what is more important, a good viewing experience, or the quest to build your own projector? I have no doubt that a homebrew projector could be built, that works great and is cheap. Maybe not as good output as a real projector (though a gutted 15-17" LCD monitor laid on an overhead projector would look nice), but acceptable. If you are looking to give a good movie-like experience, crisp and bright - stick to a bought projector. Your eyes and your guests will thank you.

    Oh - one more thing. Those 100 inch TV plans you see - while not a scam (it is possible to get an OK picture), I wouldn't bother with them other than to play or as a "party trick" (ie, an "Acid Warp" display - for those old schoolers who know what I mean)...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  101. Infocus X1 vs. BenQ 6100? by JonToycrafter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can anyone tell me why I should get an Infocus versus the BenQ 6100? The BenQ seems to sell better, is about the same price, and lighter. The light lasts longer, and is warranteed for an extra year.

    I would be using it for weekly film nights (VHS/DVD), and occasionally for video art installations. I'm not concerned with HDTV, PC resolution, etc. I'm really wondering if there's some problem I'm not considering (fan noise? Lens quality?). Price is my main concern - I wouldn't even by considering one if they weren't in the $800-850 range.

    Any advice would be helpful!

    1. Re:Infocus X1 vs. BenQ 6100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Projectorcentral reccomends the BenQ 6100 over the X1 due to its 3X color wheel.

  102. 16:9 or 4:3? (and some advice) by Faeton · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ask a lot of people have been saying already, the InFocus X1 is pretty good. I would have got it, except that it's only native 4:3.

    The biggest decision you should make about getting a projector is not the technology behind it (because honestly, at the consumer level, it's all about the same). What you do want to ask yourself is do you want a 16:9 (widescreen) or a 4:3 native.

    Of course, you can display either one on any projector, but only one natively. If you pretty much only watch TV, 4:3 would be OK. But I would still ask you to consider 16:9 due to HDTV formats. If you only watch movies, or a mixture of the 2 (plus video games!), 16:9 is the way to go (so that leaves the X1 out of the picture).

    16:9 also has some other benefits. You can get a larger maximum picture with a cheaper screen, since most screens are limited by the height (since cloth is width limited, which = height when put up on the wall). You also loose less resolution when watching normal 4:3 TV (which is somewhat a moot point since normal TV looks pretty crappy when it's 100" diagonal).

    I myself have the Panasonic LT-300U. DVD's actually start looking crappy compared to HDTV on my projector. And XBox is pretty sweet when you play in HDTV mode.

    One last word of advice: Make your own mount (if you're mounting from the ceiling). Don't bother to pay $200+ for a hunk of steel when you can make a better one for only $40. Just get a nylon cutting board, some ABS pipe, screws, springs and some nice black matte paint. Save yourself a bunch of cash for that HDTV convertor, and it'll be far more adjustable than the OEM one.

    It's *really* amazing to see how things have gotten cheaper in the last 5 years. My home theater only cost $2000, and I don't bother going to the theaters anymore.

  103. Meh... by JMZero · · Score: 1

    My reply wasn't meant to be caustic. And really I don't think it was. I think he had some facts wrong, so I thought he should do some more research - and not rule out off-the-shelf solutions based on the misconception that bulbs lasted hundreds of hours. Imagine reading that sentence in a quizzical sort of voice, not an insulting one.

    Sometimes it's easy to read emotion into typing that wasn't intended to be there.

    Also, I'm not going to work all my arguments around not wanting to offend those who may have good reason to do X random thing. For 99% of people, watching more than 4 hours of TV a day is a really bad idea and constitutes more TV than needs to be budgeted for.

    As to the signal ratio, I provided on-topic information in my post (though I think I over-stated the standard industry bulb-life, 3000hr is still pretty rare it seems).

    As to the question of using some other kind of bulb, I figured it was doable but would result in a horrible picture. While this might be acceptable in his application, he had also suggested that this might be an applicable solution for a home theatre - and I just wanted to suggest why it wouldn't work well (uneven lighting) and stress that I think this will lead to a very bad picture.

    I'm sorry I offended you with the post - I certainly didn't intend it to be the flame you read it as.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  104. PJ Central by RoboRay · · Score: 2, Informative

    The first place I'd look if you're thinking about buying a projector is the "Highly Recommended" list at Projector Central: http://www.projectorcentral.com/recommended-home-t heater-projectors.htm

    I'm using a Sanyo Z2, and couldn't be happier.

  105. DIY Labs has step by step guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just go there (http://www.diylabs.org/projector") ) and get the plans for their three generation pf projectors. They also have links to the materials.

  106. For a REAL projector, you need an eidophor by mikeselectricstuff · · Score: 1

    The Eidophor an amazingly ingenious bit of vintage technology, used from the 50s to the 80s for REALLY BIG projections.... I want one!

  107. Hmmm.. by JMZero · · Score: 1

    If these bulb really lasts longer than 2000 hours...well great but I wish consumer reports or someone would actually do a conclusive test and not just rely on ancedote or vague impressions.

    Looking back at your original problem, you probably aren't going to get even the rated bulb hours - as you'll be running the things for long periods (getting them too hot).

    I sort of over-freaked at the idea of using a homebrewed lighting setup in a home theatre (where I still think it would be a bad idea) - but it might be worth a try here.

    It used to be the LCD overhead panels were really cheap on EBay (and would have worked great here) - but that was a few years ago when they were being replaced with small projectors. I don't think they're going to be cheap now unless you know someone at a school or some such.

    Too bad huge LCD's are so expensive..

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  108. Webmaster must be pissed...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That his site was slashdotted *and* that his
    data transfer quota was exceeded for the month.
    Slashdot, please consider mirroring the contents,
    especialy if it's a Geocities site.

  109. Projector Fuhrers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need some projector nazies on this board

  110. From one EE to another by NoseBag · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a (retired) EE at age 51, I've built a lot of projects. I learned a long time ago to ask myself the following question before any home project starts:

    Do I want to HAVE it, or do I want to BUILD it.

    Saved myself a lot of work that way.

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
    1. Re:From one EE to another by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      [golf clap]

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  111. lamp costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for an AV company, and want to let you know to beware of lamp costs. Depending on brand and model they can run anywhere from $300-$500, and last from 500-1000 hours. Don't use the thing to watch re-runs of the West Wing on Bravo, or that lamp will die out before you know it.

  112. Better Plans by randomErr · · Score: 1

    Here a better place for a Ghetto Video Projector:

    http://www.audiovisualizers.com/madlab/lcd_proj.ht m

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  113. Re:Wrong place. X1 IS a good buy, not perfect by bobalu · · Score: 1

    I've had good experience with the InFocus X1 at about 12 ft from a plaster wall, no rainbow stuff but I do get some lines once in awhile with DirectTV. It looks much better with a DVD in the PS/2. I'd probably spend the extra to go full HD if I were to do it again, but it's cheap enough. I put a 9x12 ft dropcloth on the back of the house and have it about 20 ft out, looks GREAT.

    It really does require low light though. If you want to watch much during the day you'll want something at least twice as bright. I haven't tried it yet with an HD source, anyone else?

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  114. Ok, so you want a movie theatre by Raunch · · Score: 1

    Have you looked into a TV? I know that you can get a larger picture with a projector, but you have to ask yourself:
    "How big of a picture do I need for a private movie viewing room?"
    My brother just bought a 55" HDTV for 1500. That was through a buddy though. I'm not sure what you could get it for if you shopped around. It looks at about 1900 online.
    Here is one link

    --
    George II -- Spreading Freedom and American values, one bomb at a time.
  115. Defining "distance" by clem.dickey · · Score: 1

    In other words, the distance we should be concerned with is "focal point to screen", not "projector to screen." True, but not significant unless we get some really wild lens designs. Even then they just achieve a small, bright picture. May as well use a regular LCD display if that's what you want. :-)

  116. Re:Similar question...OHP + LCD panel = ghetto by plotz · · Score: 1

    I know since I've been using this setup for a few months. Parts purchased from ebay

    dukane 4000 lumen projector - $90
    nview z350 svga lcd panel - $260

    $10 420w FXL halogen bulbs claim to be good for 50 hours, but I've been getting 80+ hours at the lower brightness setting on the ohp. I project onto a textured white wall at about 140" diagonally; dvds look almost good in a dark room. ;) It's bulky and ugly, but hey it's cheap. And deep-down, everyone wants a ghetto projector...

  117. the Kloss Novabeam by PsychoSkorp · · Score: 1

    Just in case you come across one... I lucked (?) out and a friend sold me an old Kloss Novabeam CRT projector that spent many years in storage for $100... They usually give you a 9' wide picture. If you can find one, they are worth picking up as a toy if nothing else. They were designed in the 80's (mine's a model 1-A from 1986) so the resolution is great for, say, VHS. Elite Video still carries replacement CRT's at about $300 each. The CRT's seem to last for quite a long time, I've been using mine for years with no noticeable loss in brightness. You can occassionally find them on e-bay for dirt cheap, but good luck trying to get them shipped as they are heavy beasts. They were originally sold with curved 9' wide screens, which I hear were quite delicate and a nightmare to ship.

  118. I'm building one by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

    Using the plans for the MkI at diylabs.org

    First the downside, expect a LOT of tweaking to get it right. I've spent maybe 16 hours (over the course of a couple months) trying to get it just right. It all comes down to illumination; the light going through the LCD must be perfectly parallel, and then must be focused on the projection lens. If you don't get it just right, you get a bright in focus spot in the middle, falling off towards the edge.

    I still don't have it quite right. I know what the problem is and I know how to fix it; if you're curious, "fresnel splitting" is what you should look for.

    The biggest advantage of the plans at diylabs.org is that it uses metal halide bulbs, plenty bright enough for the job, but the bulbs only cost $30 or so each, instead of a couple hundred. You have to pay more up front, but over the life of the unit it'll more than make up for it.

    You don't have to use an LCD for overhead projection. I used a typical car mount LCD, split it in half, removed the rear light array. If you go this route, two things to keep in mind; 1. the ribbon cables are fragile. I laid the whole assembly flat and coated liberally with epoxy to protect. 2. There might be a diffuser lens behind your screen. It'll look shiny and reflective, and you might assume it's a polarizer. If you can't get your projector to work try carefully removing it.

    Overall I'm pretty satisfied; or at least I will be once I get the final fresnel lens I need :) I spent $100 on the LCD, $175 on the light, $40 on miscellaneous electronics (switch, fans, 12V power converter, wiring) I splurged the $60 for a projection screen; I highly recommend seeing what it's like without one, as I can't tell the difference between it and the bright white wall I was using at first...

    --
    I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  119. CRT all the way... by kobotronic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You want good picture, theater-like quality, at a budget. Yes? Does your home theater feature a light controlled environment? Then you should buy a cheap antique 3-tube CRT projector on the used market. These babies can be had for the price you mention. (Ten years ago when they were new, they cost $50K easy.)

    CRTs provide beautiful picture, some even do true HD resolutions. All razor sharp image without pixels.

    Thing is, the picture is not as bright as that provided by modern DLP or LCD projectors, which is why you need the light controlled environment.

    Also, CRT projectors weigh a ton ... 140 lbs and above is not unheard of, and setting them up correctly is a bit of a science project. They're certainly not the kind of theater-in-a-briefcase things you just casually take with you to parties.

    But the reward is amazing picture quality for your home theater with an amazing viewing experience for not a whole lot of money. Also, there's a healthy online community of CRT enthusiasts as nerdy and helpful as HAMs and vinyl freaks.

    I have a 12 year old projector which paints a lovely 140" 720p 16x9 image on the screen which has the surface area of about nine 42" plasma TVs. I paid about $500 for it including all parts and peripherals. It weighs 135 lbs and I'm going to ceiling mount it directly above my viewing position in my home theater. :}

  120. Someone's experiences by zoiblot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a posting here that describes someone's experiences. An infocus X1 is the projector.

  121. Notes on the VPL-HS20 by sydlexic · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few points about the HS20 from personal experience. It *does* have amazing image quality and resolution.

    But...

    I went through three brand new HS20's (all sent back to Sony) before giving up on it. They all suffered from the same problem which was an inconsistent color temperature. For example, with a white screen, the lower left corner was pinkish and the top right was bluish. All three exhibited this behavior. I could get the same effect on a black screen with no inputs, so it was not my input. It seemed like a manufacturing defect with one or more of the panels being "pinched".

    Second, the color registration on the three panels was never spot on and it's not adjustable. So the crosshair in the middle of the screen was white, but all the others had blue or red fringes.

    Third, I wanted an all digital system. This projector has DVI input which is sweet. Unfortunately, at the native resolution of the panels (16x9 at 1388x768), it only accepts a refresh of 56.6Hz. That means movies show a slight jerkiness since the frame refresh does not sync up with output of the computer. Using a lower resolution results in blurring and scaling of the image inside of the projector which totally negates the point of a pure digital picture (and letting the computer handle scaling, etc). It also makes for a crappy desktop.

    Sony also refuses to divulge any info about supported display modes. One support idiot claimed that connecting a PC to the projector via DVI was not supported and could damage the projector or PC. Sometimes Sony's proprietary ways are a little too much to bear.

    I owned the previous generation of VPL Sony home theater projectors and they did not exhibit these problems (color and alignemnt). I'm hoping these flaws are fixed because it's an otherwise amazing piece of hardware.

  122. Ebay got me a projector for $103.00 USD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    heres what *I* did.

    Browsed ebay for a few months till I found a good deal on a projector that I liked. I made sure it was a large unit with a large reflector. Bought it for $103.00 USD

    Upon receiving the unit and testing it to find the metal halide bulb was indeed gone, I replaced it with my OWN bulb holder, etc, that uses a standard 11,000 lumen 500 watt tungsten lamp. Replacements now cost me 3 bucks at home depot(instead of a 600-1000). It's one of the lower voltage 500 watters so it's not a yellow light and it's rather bright.

    Now when I want to pack up my 10 foot screen tv and move it, I just tuck it under my arm and out the door I go.

    Note that you may have problems with macrovision on some projectors. If you find that it goes bright and dark all the time, you can thank macrovision for thier crippleware.

    -Plappy

  123. Sanyo Z2 Pics here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently bought a Sanyo Z2 for $2000. It looks great and was worth every penny. I just point it on my big flat white wall, no screen needed. It's connected to my HTPC via DVI for 720Progressive. The picture is huge, over 100 inches. I use it for anything and everything, movies, gaming, web browsing, etc. My friends and are jealous.

    Check out some screenshots..

    http://www.lifeunderrocks.com/proj/1.JPG
    http:/ /www.lifeunderrocks.com/proj/2.JPG
    http://www.lif eunderrocks.com/proj/3.JPG
    http://www.lifeunderro cks.com/proj/4.JPG
    http://www.lifeunderrocks.com/ proj/5.JPG
    http://www.lifeunderrocks.com/proj/6.J PG
    http://www.lifeunderrocks.com/proj/7.JPG

  124. Toshiba TLP S30 by Tedium+Unleased · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cost me about $1200, bought offline. Looks like you may be able to get it cheaper now. I've had mine for almost a year. 100+ operating hours. Playing XBox, Dreamcast and DVDs. Hooked up my laptop a few times and for some reason, it worked above 800x600 resolution. I believe my laptop is set to 1024x768. Why it still worked I have no idea, but it looked great.

    I may have spent too much - maybe I could have gone with one of these $300 projectors. I didn't know there were $300 projectors at the time.

    I keep my projector about 8-10 feet from a wall, used paper from an artstore to line the wall. You could guess I'm not an A/V nut. I used an old pair of powered computer speakers w/ subwoof that is plenty good enough for me. I have no idea what the ratings are, and the speakers are placed behind me when I watch movies - which one person found a little strange. I have the speakers facing at the back wall, and it doesn't bother me one bit that the sound doesn't come from the wall - either I don't notice it, or it does end up coming from the screen-wall enough that I don't care. My cats consantly knock over the speakers and I don't even bother to pick them up.. so my advice on audio should be taken with a grain of salt; though I am a musician, if that means anything.

    At 8-10 feet the image is about 8' diagonally. Wide screen, full screen, computer screen, whatever - doesn't matter it looks good. I would work off of it as a desktop to work with apps - but I loaded Warcraft 3 on the laptop and it looked great. Actually - I think Soul Calibur on the Dreamcast looks better than Soul Calibur 2 on XBox, on the projector.

    Maybe the novelty hasn't worn off yet - but I think this is one of the best purchases I've made. It turns every crappy game and crappy movie into something decent - because hey - it's freakin huge!

  125. uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit being a fag and drop the cash on a good DLP projector. Bah!!! "Homebrew" projector... Have fun with your movies looking like dump.

  126. Projectors are the way of the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who are buying plasmas and LCDs dont know what they're missing. Projectors give you better bang for your buck. I know, I have one. I could get

    1. Protable!
    2. Adjustable picture size
    3. Doesnt take any room up
    4. Movie theater feel
    5. Pay less and get a bigger picture

    Projectors are the way of the future

  127. your car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you may not pay $200/bulb for your car, but apparently some jokers pay $1500-2000/headlight for their cars. E.g., the Xenon headlights in Nissan Maximas

  128. what about 3d projection by drfrog · · Score: 1

    i too have been looking but i want 3d projection too

    anyone?

    --
    back in the day we didnt have no old school
  129. Re:Bulb life shouldn't be a problem for most peopl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just check the warranty clock on my 32" TV. It was first used on 1/3/99 and it has been on for 10095 hours. That includes all the time i left it on overnight when I was sleeping. That is 2k hours per year.

  130. Those overpriced replacement parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, on the other hand, if the bulb lasts a somewhat reasonable length of time, then when it dies you shouldn't buy a replacement bulb--you should just buy another new projector.

    I've seen the same phenomenon with printers and print cartridges. A friend of mine recently decided that instead of spending $35 to $40 on a replacement print cartridge, he simply bought a brand new printer/scanner/fax machine for $40. Granted, this technique fills up our landfills with not-so-obsolete printers, but if the ink cartridge manufacturers insist on such high margins....

  131. Running Cost and other Worries by vonkas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Biggest drawback is running cost - the bulb alone costs $0.5-1 per hour. Hard to say what else wears out. I found pictures from LCD based projectors to hazy to enjoy. DLP pictures are better but if you have a powerful soumd system it can upset the little mirrors on the DLP and you see 'waves' as the sub booms. All this is not ideal yet. I'd like to see laser scanning projectors before I make my move.

  132. Cheap DIY screen by horvathcom · · Score: 1
    If you want a decent cheap do it yourself screen, go with Parkland Plastics building material. I forget the exact name of the material. Check avsforum.com for details.

    It is a white buiding material that happens to have a matte side that is very good for a projection screen. A 4x8 sheet cost me about $13 at Menards. You can order 5x10 sheets direct from them in Indiana.

    The beauty of it is that it is cheap, and much more resilient to things like little fingers and crayons than something like a Stewart or DaLite screen. And if it does get destroyed, buy another one!

  133. Build your own screen by moronline · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd think twice about investing beaucoup bucks on a screen if you're going for a low-end projector. I paid just under $1,100 for my Sanyo PLV-Z1 (very happy with it, outstanding picture), but I couldn't justify blowing potentially *way* more on a pro screen. As others have mentioned, AVS Forum is THE site, and its Screens forum is full of cheap (as in inexpensive) do-it-yourself ideas. I created an essentially pro-quality screen by spending about $60 on a 4-by-8 sheet of Formica, some Kilz primer, and a pint of Behr Ultra White paint (all available at your local Home Depot). I used my old Wagner power painter to get nice, even coverage (it's tough to get rollers to cooperate), and finished the job with some cheap wood molding spray-painted black for a screen frame (a key; it really makes the colors jump out). I got some Velcro strips to secure the whole shebang to the wall, and presto -- great screen for a fraction of what the pros cost. I'm the anti-Norm Abram as a handyman, so if I can do it, anyone can.

  134. Best picture quality... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use your retinas, peep outside.

    $3000 will take you from NY to China (and back) or on the roadtrip of your lifetime.

  135. Bulbs can last a long time if you treat them right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using a video projector as my main TV for about 9 years now. It is a Sharp LCD home theatre projetor. It was a great projector in it's day but, somewhat lacking by modern standards.

    Here is what stands out though: I have used this projetor nearly every day for 9 years and am still on the original bulb! The bulb is only rated for 3000 hours, but I easily have double that amount on it.

    The secret to long bulb life is to minimize power cycles and provide a large amount of air flow through the unit. When I turn the projector on in the evening, I leave it turned on continuously, even if I'm going to leave for a few hours and come back later to watch TV.

    The other important thing to look for in a projector is good air flow. There are so many projectors out there today with tiny or non-extistant fans. The manufactures design them like this in order to make them quiet. But my experiecne has been it's the quiet low-flow units that have bulbs that fail frequently, while the noisy high air flow units seem to last forever.

    At my workplace we have a large number of InFocus units that are fairly quiet with nearly non-existant air flow thru them. These things can't seem to last more than 1000 hours without blowing out a bulb.

    However, we also have a Mitsubishi LCD projector that runs continuously and has several very large fans in it producing an insane amount of air flow. It has been running for over a year without a power cycle on the same bulb! That's over 8000 hours, yet the thing is only rated for 1500 hours.

  136. NEC LT240K by LodCrappo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought the nec lt240k after reading the review at projector central http://www.projectorcentral.com/nec_lt240k.htm I am very pleased with this unit. It costs ~$2000, about twice the price of the entry level HT projectors that have been mentioned alot in this discussion.. but it's twice the projector in many ways. It has 2000 lumens, which makes a big difference compared to the ~1000 lumen projectors. I project onto a flat white wall and the 12ft wide by 9ft tall image is decent during daylight and outstanding at night. I'm sure a real screen would improve daylight viewing. People are very impressed by both the size of the image and the quality of the picture. You will need about 17 feet of distance from the screen to achieve a screen this size, but thanks to the many keystone and aspect correcting options you can put the projector very far off center. I actually have it mounted in the ceiling of a hallway thats almost 5 feet off center of my screen and it works great. Its pretty quiet in normal mode, but it also has an econo mode which at night is still great viewing and VERY quiet. I'm assuming that it also saves on bulb life. If you want a larger and brighter screen than the $1000 units, consider this one. You do get alot more for the extra cash, and at $2k its still cheaper than a decent "little" 50 something inch rear projection tv. You don't mind the fact that it only weighs about 7 lbs when you have to move either!

    --
    -Lod
  137. Inverse square law by neonleonb · · Score: 1

    Radiant energy from a point source (like, say, a light bulb) decreases as the square of the distance because the same amount of energy radiates equally in all directions, so the energy is spread over a shell of radius 4*pi*r^2.

    On the other hand, the energy of a projector is spread out over the size of the projection area, so the energy is inversely proportional to the edge size squared. So you could project onto a sheet one foot in front of the projector, but if you projected an enormous rectangle, the intensity would necessarily be very low.

    However, if the projector emits light over a fixed range of angles (the aperture is fixed), then the edge distance is proportional to the radius, so you are right: E is proportional to 1/r^2.

  138. What out for eBay projectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always go to www.avsforum.com for projector information. You'll find that a lot of eBay crts for real cheap are parts pj's (the tubes are shot and you'll spend $1500 on "rebuilt" ones).
    You should first research what will suit your needs more, crt or digital. You will also want to look at your pricepoint.
    I have an infocus x1 (digital - dlp - svga) and I love it. I got it for $875 and it's my first pj. There are lots that are better and there are lots that are more expensive.
    If you're looking digital, then you'll want to decide on lcd vs dlp. Dlp yields deeper blacks, but usually at an expense of resolution or lumens. Lcd yields higher resolution and brightness, but usually at an expense of black levels.
    Crt is probably the king of picture quality, but they are large, heavy, and as any old analog components, require maintenance (usually some solder here and some resistors there). They can be a great investment, if you're handy in that area, want the deepest blacks, and the longest use.
    Crt's are meant to run for decades, which is why many bought will be 10+ years old. Their tubes average like 10000 hours (red can usually run 20000), but they are like $500 each to replace. Digitals are basically disposable. They are meant to be used and replaced in a couple of years. I think you will normally replace the unit before the second bulb (which normally only rate for 3000 hours). On the other hand, digital is great for people that don't know about electronics or don't care. They are plug and play and very easy to set up. My x1 is moved around weekly, so it's definately a plus.
    JJ

  139. Re:Hmm, e-bay could still be a good deal. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    It could still be a good idea though, if you factor in the cost of the new bulb and the price is still significantly less then what it would be new.

    This varies upon unit and blah blah, but that's what I would do.

    You can't really rely on the word of an ebay seller, so you gotta take some precautions is all. Go look at R/C nitro engines. Every single one on ebay has "Less then one gallon" through them. Ya, right.. so you gotta factor in the price for a new piston/sleeve.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  140. Beware: Cable TV coax shields are grounded by SegFault · · Score: 1

    Yeah, could be ground loop.

    I diagnosed a friend's system that was experiencing similar issues. It turns out that it was a ground loop between the coax on the cable TV line and his computer that was causing it. He had the CATV box and computer both hooked into a AV receiver. It took a while to isolate the problem since it at first appeared that only the computer was grounded (via a 3-prong outlet). Experimentation revealed the CATV coax as the other ground source, which of course was grounded in a distant location. A home-made 75ohm unun was made to decouple the line. After that, things worked as expected. Another option would be to isolate the computer from ground by cutting the 3rd prong off the power connector, but that's not the best approach.

  141. Source for setup by thetorpedodog · · Score: 1

    Buy the most recent issue of Popular Science. They've got a great guide in their How 2.0 section on building your own home theatre system with a projector-type system this month. Try there for some inspiration. :)

    --
    This sig is certified free of self-referential humour!
  142. French DIY site by c_ollier · · Score: 1

    Lots of DIY projects here, with many pics, and french text.

  143. Re: Some Warnings About DLP / full 1080 HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just returned home from the NAB show in Vegas. Sanyo was showing the "HD10" This is a full 1920x1080 resolution projector using 3 panels for the color primaries and 4 lamps for like 5000 ANSI lumen light output! This thing is a beast weighing 85 lbs at a cost of about $1000/lb! They suggested it will be available for purchase in about 60 days. (Eiki had the same projector on display but branded with their name and claimed immediate availability.) They were projecting a huge image and it looked absolutely unbelievable! Obviously I want one but I'm going to have to wait until they get a little more affordable ;)

    Sanyo had a number of other projectors on display including the rather affordable Z2, a 1280x720 projector for about $2000.

  144. Who said anything about halogen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slide projector lamps may be tungsten halogen, but a decent video projector is going to have a metal halide lamp. There's no way you're going to get that many lumens out of such a small space otherwise.

    aQazaQa

  145. But that's what I was saying... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That link is saying what I was trying to - that "Screen Door" is about seeing the space between the pixels, not the pixels themselves... not the same as seeing the squares that make up the image.

    DLP has pretty much eliminated that as a problem, whereas with LCD you can make it out quite a bit easier and sometimes from normal viewing distances.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  146. Macrovision is a non-issue... by kobotronic · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... just get a momitsu or kiss player or anything else with a Sigma EM85xx chip driving it. There are usually firmwares floating around, unlocking and removing the macrovision shit. This also enables the pre-scaled high-res HD and SVGA output resolutions for DVD content on those players.

    Fuck hollywood. Fuck macrovision. Fuck region codes.

  147. lightgun on overhead projector by alephnull42 · · Score: 1

    Prolly too many comments out there for this to be read/modded:

    Doeas anyone know of a hack to get lightguns to work with an overhead projector?

    I had an idea but I suck at analog electronics:
    Point an analog camera at the screen, have it sync off the actual video signal (50/60 HZ x 525 lines or whatever the video standard is in your country).
    Equip guns with a laser pointer, the dot on the screen would be way bright compared to the projected image, pipe the signal back into the lightgun input...

    Anyone know if this could/could not work??

    --
    Not confused enough? http://translate.google.com/translate?u=www.slashdot.jp&hl=en&ie=UTF8&sl=ja&tl=en
  148. $300 projector + XBox = Home Theater (video) by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

    I found a NEC MT1200 projector (800x600 native, 800 lumens) that was in "good physical condition, powers on, no lamp" -- so couldn't be tested further. $150 on eBay from some asset liquidator..

    I took the risk, and luckily found a bulb for $150 a week later. The lens was smudged a bit--easily cleaned. When I tested the unit there were a few dead pixels, not really noticable with motion on the screen.

    All in all, I think I did pretty well. Have it hooked up to my XBox (HDTV@480p->VGA converter) running XBox Media Center, streaming from a file server in a different room. $500 and the video portion of my home theater is taken care of (sans big HDDs that I store my DVDs on)..

    I had a $6000 3000 lumens Mitsubishi XU300 a few years ago--this isn't *that* much worse. Lower native res and the curtains need to be drawn, but who watches movies in broad daylight anyway? And 800x600 is plenty for a standard DVD (720x480)..

    Now just to get that second XBox up and backfed through the coax running in the walls already, and I'll have access to my library from every TV in the house.. :)

  149. sx21 by la3541 · · Score: 1

    jvc sx21 is the best projector. its all about the resoluton 1400x1050 for the price cant be beat. colors are awesome too.

  150. Lifetime by shaffei · · Score: 1

    For how long can I keep the projector powered on and working?

    AFAIK, its lamp will be affected.

    --
    Best regards, HimaTech
  151. Optoma ThemeScene H30 is the new kid on the block by bmfs · · Score: 1

    The X1 has been usurped by the new Optoma ThemeScene H30. Less rainbows, quieter, greater contrast ratio and produces a very film-like image. Cost is around 1000 (GB Pounds) - projector central lists a price of $1400 (US).
    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?thre adid=351894
    http://www.avforums.com/forums/showthread.php?thre adid=127171&perpage=15&pagenumber=1
    http://www.projectorcentral.com/part_opinions.cfm? part_id=2235
    http://www.themescene.tv/Newsite/H30-Main.htm

    From MikeD on avforums.com:

    Having completed the fabrication of a steel mount the H30 was duly screwed to the ceiling and a good quality composite and a SCART/VGA cable were connected. Incidentally while on the subject of ceiling mounting, the 3mm mounting holes in the base of the H30 look pretty inadequate for supporting 1100 of projector from the ceiling. I took the precaution of drilling a hole in the ceiling mount base plate to accommodate an additional 6mm bolt; this was then screwed into the tripod-mounting hole for additional security.

    Anyway having lined it all up some friends came around to help set it up and see how it performed. One is the proud owner of an AE300 and the other a high end Sony CRT projector that he has installed in a dedicated room with matt black walls to reduce light reflection.

    Having quickly tweaked the basic settings on the H30 we darkened the room and put on The Scorpion King, we sat there in utter amazement; the picture quality was truly awesome.

    We then put on Armageddon, as we tend to use it, as a reference disc as it contains a good variety of differing scenes, again the picture quality was amazing.

    The H30 uses the Pixelworks deinterlacing and scaling chip as opposed to the popular and unquestionably competent Faroudja DCDI, this was my only reservation about the projector prior to purchasing.

    Not anymore, the picture was very sharp and had an extremely pleasing film like quality with few artefacts even in fast moving scenes and panned shots.

    The black level was incredible far better than anything I have ever seen before south of CRT. I had the masking lens attached which I think I read somewhere increases the contrast ratio to around 2500:1 by reducing unwanted light. Projectors cant project black, correct me if Im wrong but my belief is that to get true black the pixels in the chip are in effect switched off and black is in fact displayed as absence of light. This is one of the reasons why you tend to get a more pleasing picture the darker the room. Most projectors are unable to switch the pixels off completely but it is considered that DLP technology is slightly better at it than LCD particularly on budget home theatre projectors such as the H30. We also found that detail in dark scenes was outstanding, certainly better than we had expected.

    Screen door was good and fan noise acceptable, light spill was also not too bad with just a small amount on the ceiling about a foot or so in front of the projector. None of us noticed significant rainbow even though we did try very hard to see them particularly on high contrast fast moving scenes.

    We only used eco-mode, as the brightness was more than adequate for a light controlled room and less light tends to give better blacks and contrast anyway, eco mode also has the added benefit of bumping the expected lamp life up from 2000 to 3000 hours. I was actually quite surprised by the projectors brightness, we eventually put this down to the H30s six segment (RGBRGB) colour wheel and the fact

  152. BenQ PB 6100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Check http://www.projectorcentral.com/ for all your project needs. The BenQ PB 6100 is an amazing projector, I have both in my home the X1 and PB6100 and PB6100 beats it hands down in terms of picture quality and color depth. At 120 inches, DVD's look beautiful at 480P. Absolutely amazing buy. They use a 4 way color wheel as opposed to the usual DLP 3 way wheel (BenQ's own patented tech). It's good stuff... cheers...

  153. NEC LT240K by sofakingon · · Score: 1, Informative

    I got an NEC LT240K projector for my living room about 8 months ago. 100" diagonal, DLP chip so there's no "screen door" effect, 2 VGA inputs and 1 svideo input (the vga inputs double as composite DVD/HDTV with a VGA>Composite adapter)

    I couldn't be happier. this projector has a crisp picture, contrast ratio of 2000:1, and I always use the economy mode, which provides 3000 hours usage at 1600 lumens and it runs at a whisper. It is still a great picture during the day if I close the curtains.

    Its great for throwing parties (visualization plugins on the screen are awesome) I have a 6.1 home theater hooked up to it, as well as digital satellite, dvd with composite out, and my entertainment system computer (actually I'm typing on it right now).

    Anyways for the $2600 I spent on it ($2300 for the projector from mwave, $200 for the cieling mount and $100 for the screen [I live in Seoul so screens run quite a bit cheaper here])

    I did a LOT of research before I bought it and it is one of the best purchases I've ever made. Screw PDP's. Projectors ROCK!

    If I haven't convinced you yet, here is a review at Projector Central.

  154. My attempts at DIY Projection by vinyljunky · · Score: 1
    I've had alot of experience with DIY projectors and spent around a year actively pursuing the dream of big screen at low price.

    During the project I was active in the video forum of http://www.diyaudio.com/ , where alot of good thoughts were emerging on the subject of custom projectors - not purely OHP+LCD panel type setups. The five vital factors required to build a decent projector were found to be:

    - Good heat dissipation

    - A long life, decent color temperature lighting setup

    - A well designed reflector

    - Decent optics, aligned according to the basic rules of projection (using such items as fresnel lenses, PCX lenses, doublets etc.)

    - The highest res. transparent LCD you can afford.

    My setup was a custom built upstanding unit, using an OHP Data panel (see-through LCD) and a rather large PCX lense which I am very proud of - it came out of an American tank targeting system and weighs a couple of kilos - it can throw the light from one blue LED about 20 meters!!. I used a 400W Metal Halide bulb with suitable ballast - very bright white light! and fashioned an ellipsoid reflector out of mirrored alu sheeting.

    The results? See them at the following link which includes pictures from the very beginning of my tinkering:

    http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4291451499

    The projected image was huge and bright, but the optics system required alot of tweaking. Heat was also a major problem and I melted a few fresnel lenses in the testing stages. Due to university starting up again, I copped out and bought an OHP for some instant gratification. Results of that system can also be seen at the above link.

    There's lots of theory behind building a projector, but at the end of the day, you can build one easily if you do your research and can handle very basic geometry. There are many other types of custom build units, including ones using stripped down LCD monitors, fluorescent lighting, very small LCDs etc etc. DIYAudio is a great resource with lots of enthusiastic people posting their thoughts and results.

    1. Re:My attempts at DIY Projection by hobbsbutcher · · Score: 1

      My attempts have mostly included a flashlight and hand shadows. I can make a cool gorilla.

      --
      Jonathan B.
  155. My research by Innova · · Score: 2, Informative

    Like others have said AVS Forum is the best place to research. We recently finished our basement and I decided on the InFocus 5700. It's not true HD resolution, but HD does look awesome on it. I also looked at the Infocus 4800 (similar to the X1), but I saw rainbows with it's slower color wheel.

    The most important thing is to see each of the major technologies (DLP, LCD, LCOS, CRT) to decide if the tradeoffs of each will be a problem for you.

  156. Think "Total Cost of Ownership"... by Kingstrum · · Score: 1

    As a recently laid-off A/V repair tech/installer/programmer ("why yes, I used to work for Mighty Colossal Shitheads, Inc."), my advice: stay the hell away from all of them! Projectors are great until they break or you experience a lamp failure. Unless you really have a space that needs filled, simply avoid them.

    If you absolutely must have one, of all the brands we used to service Sharp's seemed to have the best record of least repair. {Note: I have no relationship to Sharp whatsoever.} All of the ones that get big press -- InFocus/Proxima, Epson, Sony, etc. -- were in for repairs on a very steady basis. Make sure the unit will cover all of the signals (and the ranges) you might want to throw at it. Find out the details on service, should you ever need it (you will). Over all, your best bet may be to find a local dealer of several different brands and take a few of your own test DVDs/tapes and ask to see a demo.

    Also if you get one, find out how old the model is (gives you a rough idea how soon it will go out of production &/or whether the firmware has been tested) and for "BOB"s sake!, find out how much a replacement lamp is *BEFORE* you buy anything. In the course of less than 6 months the entire industry went from a range of lamp replacement times to a flat "90 days from purchase"...no matter how long it was sitting on your shelf. Nothing gets people more pissed off than to discover their brand new projector has a 3-year repair warranty, but the lamp is only covered for the first 3 months...and on day 91 when it goes out, they've got to pony up anywhere from $300 to ~$2k (very high end, true theater units) for a new light bulb.

    If you opt to avoid a projector, *DO NOT* get some piece of crap plasma as a substitute. The dirty little secret the industry doesn't point out is that you're buying the TV version of a fluorescent bulb...and once the noble gas inside begins to lose cohesion, you've got yourself one nice big picture frame. The fact that most are rated for less than 20,000 hours (with a greater than 50% failure rate after 2 years) doesn't really make me feel any better.

    I've had the same 32" CRT TV for nearly 8 years now...perfect picture, perfect sound, a bitch to lug around when you move.

    Kingstrum

  157. 16:9 is not an obvious choice by pemerson · · Score: 2, Informative

    For a different opinion on this, see http://www.projectorcentral.com/formats.htm, and in particular the section called "Why get a 4:3 projector with a 4:3 screen?". What I find particularly interesting is this quote:

    Personally, I prefer a big 4:3 screen. Here's why. I want to watch widescreen movies in their widescreen glory, no doubt about it. So I have a 4:3 screen that is wide enough to give me the 16:9 display I want, which in my theater is 8 feet wide.